UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 40-F

 

☒ Registration statement pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

or

 


☐ Annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended _______________

Commission File Number ______________

 

  

ORLA MINING LTD.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Canada     1040     N/A
(Province or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
    (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

 

Suite 202, 595 Howe Street
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2T5, Canada

(604) 564-1852

(Address and telephone number of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

C T Corporation System

28 Liberty Street

New York, New York 10005

(212) 894-8940

(Name, address (including zip code) and telephone number (including area code) of agent for service in the United States)

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class   Trading Symbol(s)   Name of each exchange
on which registered
Common Shares, no par value   ORLA   NYSE American

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

 

For annual reports, indicate by check mark the information filed with this Form:

 

¨ Annual information form        ¨ Audited annual financial statements

 

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: N/A

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ¨ YES    x NO

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).   ¨ YES      ¨ NO

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 

Emerging growth company  x

 

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report ¨

 

†The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

 

Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Company”) is a Canadian public company whose common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The Company is eligible to file its registration statement pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), on Form 40-F pursuant to the multi-jurisdictional disclosure system of the Exchange Act. The Company is a “foreign private issuer” as defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act. Equity securities of the Company are accordingly exempt from Sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c), 14(f) and 16 of the Exchange Act pursuant to Rule 3a12-3.

 

References to the “Registrant” or “Company” in this Registration Statement mean Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries, unless the context suggests otherwise.

 

PRINCIPAL DOCUMENTS

 

Each of the documents that is filed as an exhibit to this Registration Statement, as set forth in the Exhibit Index attached hereto, is incorporated by reference herein.

 

In accordance with General Instruction B.(1) of Form 40-F, the Registrant hereby incorporates by reference Exhibits 99.1 through 99.107, inclusive, as set forth in the Exhibit Index attached hereto.

 

In accordance with General Instruction D.(9) of Form 40-F, the Registrant has filed written consents of certain experts named in the foregoing Exhibits as Exhibit 99.89 to Exhibit 99.106, inclusive, as set forth in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and as required by General Instruction D.(9) of Form 40-F.

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This document contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), Section 21E of the Exchange Act, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 or in rules and releases made by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), all as may be amended from time to time, as well as Canadian securities legislation and all other applicable securities legislation (referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements are included to provide information about management’s current expectations and plans that allows investors and others to get a better understanding of the Company’s operating environment, business operations and financial performance and condition.

 

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the future price of gold, anticipated costs and the Company’s ability to fund its programs, the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities, the Company’s ability to meet obligations under property agreements, the timing and results of drilling programs, the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Company’s mineral properties, the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects, the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner and the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

 

 

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others: (i) access to additional capital; (ii) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (iii) health, safety and environmental risks; (iv) success of exploration, development and operations activities; (v) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (vi) delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (vii) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (viii) uncertainty in estimates in production, capital and operation costs and potential of production and cost overruns; (ix) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (x) the fluctuating price of gold; (xi) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xii) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; (xiii) the Company’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions; (xiv) global health emergencies, and (xv) volatility in the market price of the Company’s securities.

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the Company's most recently filed Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) filed as Exhibit 99.36 to this Registration Statement and its management's discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 filed as Exhibit 99.03 to this Registration Statement.

 

Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date hereof and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. Investors are urged to read the Company’s subsequent filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which can be viewed online under the Company’s profile on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) at www.sedar.com.

 

DIFFERENCES IN UNITED STATES AND CANADIAN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

 

The Company is permitted, under a multijurisdictional disclosure system adopted by the United States, to prepare this Registration Statement in accordance with Canadian disclosure requirements, which are different from those of the United States. The Company prepares its financial statements, which are filed with this Form 40-F in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and the audit is subject to Canadian auditing and auditor independence standards, and may not be comparable to those prepared by companies in the United States. In addition, the Company is not required to prepare a reconciliation of its financial statements between IFRS and U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and has not quantified such differences, which may be significant.

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING MINERAL RESOURCE AND RESERVE ESTIMATES

 

The Company prepares its information concerning resources and mineral deposits in accordance with the requirements of Canadian securities laws, which differ significantly from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. Canadian reporting requirements for disclosure of mineral properties are governed by Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). The definitions used in NI 43-101 are incorporated by reference from the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) – Definition Standards adopted by CIM Council on May 10, 2014. U.S. reporting requirements are currently governed by the SEC Industry Guide 7 (“Industry Guide 7”) under the Securities Act. These reporting standards have similar goals in terms of conveying an appropriate level of confidence in the disclosures being reported, but embody different approaches and definitions. For example, the terms “mineral reserve”, “proven mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” are Canadian mining terms as defined in NI 43-101, and these definitions differ from the definitions in Industry Guide 7. Under Industry Guide 7 standards, a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study is required to report reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority. Further, under Industry Guide 7, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. If applicable, mineral reserve estimates contained in this Registration Statement and the documents incorporated by reference herein may not qualify as “reserves” under Industry Guide 7. Further, the SEC has not recognized the reporting of mineral deposits which do not meet the Industry Guide 7 definition of “reserve” prior to the adoption of the Modernization of Property Disclosures for Mining Registrants, which rules will be required to be complied with by certain issuers in the first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2021.

 

 

 

 

While the terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101, these terms are not defined terms under Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. U.S. readers are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. In addition, “inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and their economic and legal feasibility. A significant amount of exploration must be completed in order to determine whether an inferred mineral resource may be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian securities regulations, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian securities regulations if such disclosure includes the grade or quality and the quantity for each category of mineral resource and mineral reserve; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.

 

Accordingly, information contained in this Registration Statement and the documents incorporated by reference herein containing descriptions of the Company’s mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

 

TAX MATTERS

 

Purchasing, holding, or disposing of securities of the Registrant may have tax consequences under the laws of the United States and Canada that are not described in this Registration Statement on Form 40-F.

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMON SHARES

 

The required disclosure is included under the heading “Description of Capital Structure” in the Registrant's AIF for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, filed as Exhibit 99.30 to this Registration Statement.

 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

The Registrant does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Registrant's financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

 

CURRENCY

 

Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts in this Registration Statement on Form 40-F are in United States dollars. The exchange rate of Canadian dollars into United States dollars, based upon the daily exchange rate as quoted by the Bank of Canada, was US$1.00 = CDN$1.2988 on December 31, 2019 and US$1.00 = CDN$1.2880 on December 3, 2020.

 

 

 

 

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

 

The following table summarizes the Registrant's contractual obligations, including payments due for each of the next five years and thereafter as at December 31, 2019. This table is presented in Canadian dollars.

 

    Payments due by period  
Contractual Obligations   Total
($)
    Less than
1 year
($)
    1 – 3
years
($)
    3 – 5
years
($)
    More than
5 years
($)
 
Routine accounts payable   $ 639,000     $ 639,000                    
Lease obligations     99,000       41,000       58,000              
Camino Rojo Project Loan (note 1)     32,470,000                   32,470,000        
Newmont Loan (note 2)     15,104,000             15,104,000              
Total   $ 48,312,000     $ 680,000     $ 15,162,000     $ 32,470,000        

 

Notes:

 

1. The Camino Rojo Project Loan is denominated in United States dollars, and at December 31, 2019, the principal outstanding was US$ 25 million.

 

2. The Newmont Loan is denominated in Mexican pesos, and at December 31, 2019, the principal outstanding was 219 million Mexican pesos.

  

UNDERTAKING AND CONSENT TO SERVICE OF PROCESS

 

A. Undertaking

The Registrant undertakes to make available, in person or by telephone, representatives to respond to inquiries made by the Commission staff, and to furnish promptly, when requested to do so by the Commission staff, information relating to: the securities registered pursuant to Form 40-F; the securities in relation to which the obligation to file an annual report on Form 40-F arises; or transactions in said securities.

 

B. Consent to Service of Process

Concurrently with the filing of this Registration Statement on Form 40-F, the Registrant will file with the Commission an Appointment of Agent for Service of Process and Undertaking on Form F-X in connection with the class of securities to which this Registration Statement relates.

 

Any change to the name or address of the Registrant's agent for service shall be communicated promptly to the Commission by amendment to Form F-X referencing the file number of the Registrant.

 

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 40-F and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.

 

Date: December 4, 2020 Orla Mining Ltd.
   
  /s/ Jason Simpson
  Jason Simpson
  President and Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit
Number
 
99.01 News release, filed on November 26, 2020
99.02 Condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, filed on November 13, 2020
99.03 Management’s discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, filed on November 13, 2020
99.04 Certification of interim filings - CEO, filed on November 13, 2020
99.05 Certification of interim filings - CFO, filed on November 13, 2020
99.06 News release, filed on November 2, 2020
99.07 News release, filed on August 24, 2020
99.08 News release, filed on August 13, 2020
99.09 Condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, filed on August 10, 2020
99.10 Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, filed on August 10, 2020
99.11 Certification of interim filings – CEO, filed on August 10, 2020
99.12 Certification of interim filings – CFO, filed on August 10, 2020
99.13 News release, filed on July 2, 2020
99.14 Orla Mining Ltd. 2020 Restricted Share Unit Plan effective April 2, 2020, filed on June 11, 2020
99.15 Report on voting results, filed on May 13, 2020
99.16 Condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, filed on May 12, 2020
99.17 Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020, filed on May 12, 2020
99.18 Certification of interim filings – CEO, filed on May 12, 2020
99.19 Certification of interim filings – CFO, filed on May 12, 2020
99.20 Notice of annual and special meeting and Management Information Circular, filed on April 14, 2020
99.21 Form of proxy - Annual general and special meeting to be held on Wednesday, May 13, 2020, filed on April 14, 2020
99.22 News release, filed on April 9, 2020
99.23 Notice of predecessor auditor pursuant to NI 51 – 102 of change of auditor, filed on April 8, 2020
99.24 Notice of successor auditor pursuant to NI 51 – 102 of change of auditor, filed on April 8, 2020
99.25 Notice of change of auditor, filed on April 8, 2020
99.26 Material change report, filed on April 6, 2020
99.27 News release, filed on April 3, 2020

 

 

 

 

99.28 Notice of the meeting and record date (Amended), filed on April 3, 2020
99.29 Prospectus Supplement to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019, filed on March 30, 2020
99.30 Underwriting Agreement, filed on March 30, 2020
99.31 Marketing materials, filed on March 27, 2020
99.32 News release, filed on March 26, 2020
99.33 Material change report, filed on March 25, 2020
99.34 Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed on March 23, 2020
99.35 Certification of annual filings – CFO, filed on March 23, 2020
99.36 Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed on March 23, 2020
99.37 Certification of annual filings – CEO, filed on March 23, 2020
99.38 Class 1 Reporting Issuers and Class 3B Reporting Issuers Participation Fee, filed on March 23, 2020
99.39 Consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, filed on March 23, 2020
99.40 Notice of the meeting and record date, filed on March 6, 2020
99.41 Early warning report, filed on January 7, 2020
99.42 Report of exempt distribution, filed on December 30, 2019
99.43 Amended material change report, filed on December 30,2019
99.44 Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, filed on December 23, 2019
99.45 Loan Agreement, filed on December 23, 2019
99.46 News release, filed on December 18, 2019
99.47 Condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, filed on November 12, 2019
99.48 Management's discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, filed on November 12, 2019
99.49 Certification of interim filings – CEO, filed on November 12, 2019
99.50 Certification of interim filings – CFO, filed on November 12, 2019
99.51 Material change report, filed on October 29, 2019

 

 

 

 

99.52 Investor Rights Agreement, filed on October 29, 2019
99.53 Loan commitment letter of Trinity Capital Partners Corporation, filed on October 29, 2019
99.54 Early warning report, filed on October 23, 2019
99.55 News release, filed on October 21, 2019
99.56 News release, filed on September 9, 2019
99.57 Condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, filed on August 9, 2019
99.58 Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, filed on August 9, 2019
99.59 Certification of interim filings – CEO, filed on August 9, 2019
99.60 Certification of interim filings – CFO, filed on August 9, 2019
99.61 News release, filed on August 7, 2019
99.62 NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico, filed on August 6, 2019
99.63 Report of exempt distribution, filed on July 25, 2019
99.64 Orla Mining Ltd. Stock Option Plan Effective December 16, 2016, and amended May 24, 2018 and June 12, 2019, filed on July 24, 2019
99.65 Orla Mining Restricted Share Unit Plan Effective June 27, 2018, and amended June 12, 2019, filed on July 24, 2019
99.66 Orla Mining Deferred Share Plan Effective June 27, 2018, amended June 12, 2019, filed on July 24, 2019
99.67 News release, filed on July 15, 2019
99.68 News release, filed on June 25, 2019
99.69 News release, filed on June 12, 2019
99.70 Report on voting results, filed on June 12, 2019
99.71 Notice of annual and special meeting and Management Information Circular, filed on May 14, 2019
99.72 Certificate relating to Communication with Beneficial Owners, filed on May 14, 2019
99.73 Form of proxy - Annual general and special meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2019, filed on May 14, 2019

 

 

 

 

99.74 News release, filed on May 14, 2019
99.75 Condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, filed on May 9, 2019
99.76 Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019, filed on May 9, 2019
99.77 Certification of interim filings – CEO, filed on May 9, 2019
99.78 Certification of interim filings – CFO, filed on May 9, 2019
99.79 Notice of the meeting and record date, filed on April 3, 2019
99.80 Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed on March 29, 2019
99.81 Form 52-109F1 – IPO/RTO Certification of Annual Filings Following an Initial Public Offering, Reverse Takeover or Becoming A Non-Venture Issuer – CEO, filed on March 29, 2019
99.82 Form 52-109F1 – IPO/RTO Certification of Annual Filings Following an Initial Public Offering, Reverse Takeover or Becoming A Non-Venture Issuer – CFO, filed on March 29, 2019
99.83 Class 1 Reporting Issuers and Class 3B Reporting Issuers Participation Fee, filed on March 18, 2019
99.84 Consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, filed on March 18, 2019
99.85 Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed on March 18, 2019
99.86 News release, filed on March 11, 2019
99.87 Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus, filed on March 11, 2019
99.88 Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico, filed on March 11, 2019
99.89 Consent of David Brown
99.90 Consent of George Lightwood
99.91 Consent of Gene Tortelli
99.92 Consent of Carl E. Defilippi
99.93 Consent of David B. Hawkins
99.94 Consent of Dr. Matthew Gray
99.95 Consent of Michael G. Hester
99.96 Consent of Hans Smit

 

 

 

 

99.97 Consent of P&E Mining Consultants Inc.
99.98 Consent of Auditors – Davidson & Company LLP
99.99 Consent of Eugene Puritch
99.100 Consent of Richard H. Sutcliffe
99.101 Consent of Tracy Armstrong
99.102 Consent of Antoine Yassa
99.103 Consent of Kenneth Kuchling
99.104 Consent of David Burga
99.105 Consent of Fred Brown
99.106 Consent of Mark Gorman
99.107 News release, filed on December 4, 2020

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.1

 

NEWS RELEASE   

 

ORLA MINING PROVIDES CONSTRUCTION UPDATE FOR CAMINO ROJO OXIDE GOLD PROJECT

 

VANCOUVER, BC – November 26, 2020 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the "Company") is pleased to announce the start of earth moving activities at its Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (“Camino Rojo”) located in Zacatecas State, Mexico.

 

“The start of earth moving on site marks another important milestone in the development of Camino Rojo made possible through the collective efforts of our team and stakeholders,” stated Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Orla. “Project advancement continues in a controlled manner as we focus on maintaining the health and safety of our personnel.”

 

All permit conditions have been satisfied, including placing of an environmental bond, for site activities to begin. Major contracts for earth moving and civil works have been awarded and detailed engineering is 90% complete. Current activities include mobilization of the earthworks contractor, installation of the construction camp and offices, flora and fauna rescue, as well as site fence erection. Construction of the power line to site continues ahead of schedule thereby reducing some of the diesel generation required during the first year of production. Process plant equipment has started to arrive on site, including crusher and conveyor equipment.

 

Under Mexico’s current COVID-19 legislation, mining and construction are permitted economic activities and the Camino Rojo site has been ramping up in strict compliance with the Mexican Health Authority and Company requirements. Orla has implemented a strict COVID-19 protocol, including rigorous screening and testing programs as it began controlled mobilization to site for construction. Orla continues to maintain robust organization-wide COVID-19 prevention protocols to support the health of employees and local communities. The Company is closely monitoring the potential impacts from the pandemic on areas including equipment delivery and logistics, construction costs and schedule, as well as community and government relations.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is constructing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, a gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 160,000 hectares. The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

1

 

 

NEWS RELEASE   

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the timing of meeting certain conditions with respect to the approval of the MIA, the timing of commencement of construction activities, the results of exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources and the Company’s objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, the Company’s activities will be in accordance with the Company’s public statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required approvals will be obtained and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources; and risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson
President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Andrew Bradbury

Director, Investor Relations

 

www.orlamining.com

info@orlamining.com

 

2

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.02

 

 

Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

 

Presented in United States dollars

 

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Condensed Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars)

 

    September 30     December 31     January 1  
As at   2020     2019     2019  
          (restated,
notes 3 and 22)
    (restated,
notes 3 and 22)
 
ASSETS                        
Current assets                        
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 41,743     $ 23,106     $ 12,234  
Accounts receivable     171       94       282  
Prepaid expenses     679       53       151  
      42,593       23,253       12,667  
Restricted funds     533       509       150  
VAT recoverable (note 7)     3,349       1,340       622  
Deposits on long term assets (notes 5(a)(i) and 20(a))     18,069              
Construction in progress (note 5(a)(i))     2,593              
Equipment (note 6)     255       284       252  
Exploration and evaluation assets (note 5(d))     118,923       125,643       124,099  
TOTAL ASSETS   $ 186,315     $ 151,029     $ 137,790  
                         
LIABILITIES                        
Current liabilities                        
Trade and other payables (note 8)   $ 1,222     $ 802     $ 1,278  
Accrued liabilities     3,452       1,578       1,405  
      4,674       2,380       2,683  
Lease obligations     22       44        
Camino Rojo project loan (note 9)     13,445       12,961        
Newmont loan (note 10)     8,093       9,647       4,475  
Accrued liabilities – long term     395       261        
Site closure provisions (note 11)     558       575       626  
TOTAL LIABILITIES     27,187       25,868       7,784  
                         
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                        
Share capital (note 13)     219,169       159,230       153,852  
Reserves     29,570       30,061       19,931  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     (6,459 )     (1,027 )     (3,393 )
Accumulated deficit     (83,152 )     (63,103 )     (40,384 )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY     159,128       125,161       130,006  
                         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 186,315     $ 151,029     $ 137,790  

 

Authorized by the Board of Directors on November 12, 2020, for issuance.

 

/s/ Elizabeth McGregor   /s/ Jason Simpson
Elizabeth McGregor, Director   Jason Simpson, Director

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars, except per-share amounts)

 

    Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
    2020     2019
(restated
note 3)
    2020     2019
(restated
note 3)
 
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENSES (note 5)                                
Assays and analysis   $ 59     $ 38     $ 88     $ 160  
Drilling     258       292       258       1,021  
Geological     379       289       799       1,260  
Engineering     222       198       752       1,500  
Environmental     123       213       214       530  
Community and government     827       1,003       3,348       1,353  
Land and water use, claims and concessions     695       974       3,855       3,286  
Project management           38             131  
Project review           27       6       115  
Site activities     357       379       1,183       1,265  
Site administration     670       177       1,841       1,264  
Recognition of site closure provisions                 15        
      3,590       3,628       12,359       11,885  
                                 
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES                                
Office and administrative     162       97       541       381  
Professional fees     425       170       831       374  
Regulatory     11       30       159       95  
Salaries and benefits     563       423       1,354       1,256  
      1,161       720       2,885       2,106  
                                 
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)                                
Depreciation (note 6)     23       25       70       72  
Share based payments (note 14)     705       580       2,089       2,195  
Interest and finance costs (note 12)     1,503       467       2,718       723  
Foreign exchange loss (gain)     1,688       (1 )     947       19  
Other (gains) and losses (note 10)     (1,019 )           (1,019 )      
      2,900       1,071       4,805       3,009  
                                 
LOSS FOR THE PERIOD   $ 7,651     $ 5,419     $ 20,049     $ 17,000  
                                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME)                                
Items that may in future periods be reclassified to profit or loss:                                
Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations     (2,934 )     833       5,432       (305 )
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS   $ 4,717     $ 6,252     $ 25,481     $ 16,695  
                                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions)     227.5       185.1       213.1       181.4  
                                 
Loss per share - basic and diluted   $ 0.03     $ 0.03     $ 0.09     $ 0.09  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars)

 

    Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
        2019         2019  
Cash flows provided by (used in):   2020     (restated
note 3)
    2020     (restated
note 3)
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES                                
Loss for the period   $ (7,651 )   $ (5,419 )   $ (20,049 )   $ (17,000 )
Adjustments for items not affecting cash:                                
Depreciation     23       25       70       72  
Share based compensation     705       580       2,089       2,195  
Changes in site closure provisions charged to exploration expense                 15        
Newmont loan proceeds received in excess of fair value (note 10)           (572 )           (1,283 )
Accretion of the project loan (note 9)     646             1,950        
Interest paid on the project loan (note 9)     (550 )           (1,667 )      
Accretion of the Newmont loan (note 10)     917       481       974       805  
Interest expense on leases     3             4        
Other gains and losses     (1,019 )           (1,019 )      
Exploration expenses paid via issuance of common shares                       48  
Changes in non-cash working capital:                                
Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses     (668 )     100       (733 )     415  
Trade and other payables     455       (665 )     485       (1,254 )
Accrued liabilities     299       82       2,187       (416 )
Cash used in operating activities     (6,840 )     (5,388 )     (15,694 )     (16,418 )
                                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES                                
Proceeds from issuance of common shares                 54,959        
Proceeds from exercise of warrants     1,259       2,616       2,806       2,877  
Proceeds from exercise of stock options     1,470       349       1,689       349  
Share issuance costs           (84 )     (2,095 )     (96 )
Payment of principal portion of lease liabilities     (8 )     (5 )     (23 )     (15 )
Cash transaction costs of the Camino Rojo project loan     (35 )           (35 )      
Advances received on the Newmont loan           2,396             5,070  
Cash provided by financing activities     2,686       5,272       57,301       8,185  
                                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES                                
Purchase of equipment     (58 )     (5 )     (66 )     (9 )
Construction in progress     (1,134 )           (2,685 )      
Deposits on long term assets     (8,242 )           (18,709 )      
Restricted cash funded     (4 )     (51 )     (25 )     (354 )
Value added taxes paid, not immediately recoverable     (1,454 )     (131 )     (2,297 )     (424 )
Cash used in investing activities     (10,892 )     (187 )     (23,782 )     (787 )
                                 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash     2,124       338       812       662  
                                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash     (12,922 )     35       18,637       (8,358 )
Cash, beginning of period     54,665       3,841       23,106       12,234  
CASH, END OF PERIOD   $ 41,743     $ 3,876     $ 41,743     $ 3,876  

 

Supplemental cash flow information (note 16)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars)

 

    Common shares     Reserves     Accumulated              
    Number of
shares
(thousands)
    Amount     Share based
payments reserve
    Warrants
reserve
    Total     Other
Comprehensive
Income
    Retained
earnings
(deficit)
    Total  
Balance at January 1, 2019 (restated, note 3)     179,315     $ 153,852     $ 6,867     $ 13,064     $ 19,931     $ (3,393 )   $ (40,384 )   $ 130,006  
Shares issued for property payments     59       48                                     48  
Warrants exercised     6,167       4,433             (1,535 )     (1,535 )                 2,898  
Warrants issued           (1,459 )           1,459       1,459                    
Options exercised     338       675       (329 )           (329 )                 346  
Share issuance costs           (96 )                                   (96 )
RSUs redeemed     202       167       (167 )           (167 )                  
Share based payments                 2,195             2,195                   2,195  
Loss for the period                                         (17,000 )     (17,000 )
Other comprehensive loss                                   305             305  
Balance at September 30, 2019     186,081     $ 157,620     $ 8,566     $ 12,988     $ 21,554     $ (3,088 )   $ (57,384 )   $ 118,702  
                                                                 
Balance at January 1, 2020     187,102     $ 159,230     $ 8,159     $ 21,902     $ 30,061     $ (1,027 )   $ (63,103 )   $ 125,161  
Shares issued pursuant to a financing     36,600       54,959                                     54,959  
Share issuance costs           (2,095 )                                   (2,095 )
Warrants exercised     2,013       3,305             (499 )     (499 )                 2,806  
Options exercised     1,837       3,041       (1,352 )           (1,352 )                 1,689  
RSUs redeemed     414       335       (335 )           (335 )                  
Bonus shares issued (note 14(d))     1,000       394       (394 )           (394 )                  
Share based payments                 2,089             2,089                   2,089  
Loss for the period                                         (20,049 )     (20,049 )
Other comprehensive loss                                   (5,432 )           (5,432 )
Balance at September 30, 2020     228,966     $ 219,169     $ 8,167     $ 21,403     $ 29,570     $ (6,459 )   $ (83,152 )   $ 159,128  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

 

Orla Mining Ltd. was incorporated in Alberta in 2007 and was continued into British Columbia in 2010 and subsequently into Ontario under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) in 2014. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. The registered office of the Company is located at Suite 202, 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada.

 

The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties, and holds the Camino Rojo gold and silver project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama.

 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. Different bases of measurement may be appropriate if the Company is not expected to continue operations for the foreseeable future. As at September 30, 2020, the Company had not advanced any of its properties to commercial production and was not able to fund day-to-day activities through operating activities. During the second quarter of 2020, the Company completed a C$75 million ($55 million) equity financing. To the end of the reporting period, the Company had received $25 million of a $125 million project loan facility in respect of the Camino Rojo project, and subsequent to the reporting period received a further $50 million.

 

The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon successful results from our mineral exploration and development activities and our ability to attain profitable operations and generate cash or raise sufficient capital to meet current and future obligations. We expect to fund operating costs of the Company over the next twelve months with cash on hand and with further loan and/or equity advances.

 

Since the beginning of the fiscal year, there was a global outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”), which has had an impact on businesses through the restrictions put in place by the governments in the various jurisdictions where the Company conducts its activities. In common with all businesses in the jurisdictions in which we operate, our activities are restricted by government orders related to, among others, travel, business operations, and stay-at-home orders. As of the date of these financial statements, it is not possible to determine the extent of the impact that this global health emergency will have on the Company’s activities in the future as the Company cannot predict the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, and possible government, societal, and individual responses to the situation. We continue to monitor our activities, in particular with regard to the safety of our personnel and the communities where we conduct our activities.

 

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION

 

These condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 «Interim Financial Reporting» and do not include all the information required for full annual financial statements.

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

These condensed interim consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.

 

On November 12, 2020, the Board of Directors approved these consolidated financial statements for issuance.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

3. CHANGE OF PRESENTATION CURRENCY

 

As a result of the continued advancement of the Camino Rojo Project, the Company changed its presentation currency from Canadian dollars to United States dollars effective January 1, 2020. The change in the financial statement presentation currency is an accounting policy change and has been accounted for retrospectively. The balance sheets for each period presented have been translated from the related subsidiary’s functional currency to the new US dollar presentation currency at the rate of exchange prevailing at the respective balance sheet date except for equity items, which have been translated at accumulated historical rates from the related subsidiary’s date of incorporation. The statements of loss and comprehensive loss were translated at the average exchange rates for the reporting period, or at the exchange rate prevailing at the date of transactions. Exchange differences arising in 2018 on translation from the related subsidiary’s functional currency to the United States dollar presentation currency have been recognized in other comprehensive income and accumulated as a separate component of equity.

 

In prior reporting periods, the translation of the Company’s subsidiaries that had a United States dollar or Mexican peso functional currency into the Company’s presentation currency of the Canadian dollar gave rise to a translation adjustment which was recorded as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), a separate component of shareholders’ equity. With the retrospective application of the change in presentation currency from the Canadian dollar to the US dollar, the AOCI related to the translation of US dollar functional currency subsidiaries was eliminated. However, with the retrospective application of the change in presentation currency to the US dollar, the Company’s corporate office, which has a Canadian dollar functional currency, resulted in an AOCI balance. The AOCI balance generated by the Mexican peso entities has been adjusted since it now reflects the translation into the new US dollar presentation currency.

 

(a) Adjustment to previously reported financial information due to change in presentation currency

 

For comparative purposes, the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2019 include adjustments to reflect the change in the presentation currency to the US dollar, which is a change in accounting policy. The exchange rates used to translate the amounts previously reported into US dollars at December 31, 2019 were 1.2988 CAD/USD and 18.87 MXN/USD, and at January 1, 2019 were 1.3642 CAD/USD and 19.65 MXN/USD. Refer to note 22(a) for the effects of the translation.

 

For comparative purposes, the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 includes adjustments to reflect the change in the presentation currency to the US dollar, which is a change in accounting policy. The exchange rates used to translate the amounts previously reported into US dollars for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 were 1.3292 CAD/USD and 19.2511 MXN/USD, which were the average exchange rates for the period. Refer to note 22(b) for the effects of the translation.

 

(b) Functional currency

 

The functional currencies of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned, remained unchanged and were as follows for periods presented.

 

Orla Mining Ltd. Canadian dollars
  Minerometalúrgica San Miguel S de RL de CV Mexican pesos
  Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV Mexican pesos
  Minera Cerro Quema SA United States dollars
  Monitor Gold Corporation United States dollars

 

4. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

We applied the same accounting policies in these condensed interim consolidated financial statements as those applied in the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

In preparing these condensed interim consolidated financial statements, the significant judgements we made in applying the Company’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those that applied to the annual consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

These condensed interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

5. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION

 

(a) Camino Rojo Project

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine. In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project, a gold and silver oxide heap leach project located in Zacatecas State, Mexico, from Goldcorp Inc. (now called Newmont Corporation). A 2% net smelter return royalty (the “Royalty”) on the sale of all metal production from the oxide material at Camino Rojo was granted to Newmont as part of the acquisition.

 

The Company and Newmont also entered into an option agreement regarding the potential development of sulphide operations at Camino Rojo. Pursuant to the option agreement, Newmont will, subject to the applicable sulphide project meeting certain thresholds, have an option to acquire a 60% or 70% interest in the applicable sulphide project (“Sulphide Option”). The Royalty excludes revenue on the sale of metals produced from a sulphide project where Newmont has exercised its Sulphide Option. We maintain a right of first refusal on the Royalty. On September 21, 2020, Newmont announced that it had entered into an agreement to sell the Royalty. Our right of first refusal expires on December 20, 2020.

 

As of the issuance date of these financial statements, we have received all permits for the construction of a mine at Camino Rojo. The permits were issued with a series of customary conditions, all of which have been met or have been submitted for final approval. In anticipation of such approvals, we have already commenced activities such as construction engineering and design work which are not necessarily of an exploration and evaluation nature. Consequently, we are presenting these costs as construction in progress.

 

(i) Construction in progress

 

    Total  
Construction in progress at historical rates        
At December 31, 2019   $  
Additions     2,685  
At September 30, 2020   $ 2,685  
         
Accumulated foreign exchange on translation        
At December 31, 2019      
Due to changes in exchange rates     (92 )
At September 30, 2020   $ (92 )
         
Construction in progress        
At December 31, 2019   $  
At September 30, 2020   $ 2,593  

 

The figures in the above totals do not include deposits which have been made on key components and construction items related to the Camino Rojo project, which at September 30, 2020, totaled approximately $18.1 million (December 31, 2019 – $nil).

 

(b) Cerro Quema Project

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, Panama. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open pit mine with process by heap leaching.

 

In December 2016, we acquired 100% of the Cerro Quema Project by acquiring Pershimco Resources Inc. through the issuance of a combination of Orla common shares and warrants, and the assumption of Pershimco’s long term debt, which we subsequently paid off. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the current mineral resource areas, proposed mine development areas, and priority drill target areas.

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

The original 20-year terms for these concessions expired in February and March of 2017. The Company has applied for the prescribed ten year extension to these concessions as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. In March 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications had been received and that exploration work could continue while the Company awaits renewal of the concessions. As of the date of these financial statements, final concession renewals have not been received; however, we continue to receive ongoing drilling, water use, environmental and other permits, and have paid concession taxes, in the normal course.

 

(c) Monitor Gold Project

 

The Monitor Gold Project consists of three separate option agreements consisting of 422 claims covering 3,416 hectares in Nye County, Nevada, USA.

 

In 2019, the payments required under the option agreements consisted of $50,000 in share issuances, a $20,000 in advance royalty payments, and $30,000 in work commitments, all of which requirements were met by the Company. For 2020, these consist of $40,000 in advance royalty payments, and $75,000 in work commitments, both of which requirements for 2020 have been met. To maintain the option agreements in good standing, minimum payments and work commitments are required each year until 2038.

 

(d) Exploration and evaluation assets

 

    Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Total  
Acquisition costs at historical rates                                
At December 31, 2019   $ 42,615     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 125,358  
Additions                        
At September 30, 2020   $ 42,615     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 125,358  
                                 
Accumulated foreign exchange on translation                                
At December 31, 2019     285                   285  
Due to changes in exchange rates     (6,720 )                 (6,720 )
At September 30, 2020   $ (6,435 )   $     $     $ (6,435 )
                                 
Acquisition costs                                
At December 31, 2019   $ 42,900     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 125,643  
At September 30, 2020   $ 36,180     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 118,923  

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(e) Exploration and evaluation expense

 

Three months ended September 30, 2020   Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 59     $     $     $     $ 59  
Drilling     181       77                   258  
Geological     212       163       4             379  
Engineering     159       63                   222  
Environmental     52       71                   123  
Community and government     734       93                   827  
Land, water use, and claims     614             81             695  
Site activities     237       120                   357  
Site administration     208       461       1             670  
    $ 2,456     $ 1,048     $ 86     $     $ 3,590  

 

Nine months ended September 30, 2020   Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 87     $     $ 1     $     $ 88  
Drilling     181       77                   258  
Geological     564       231       4             799  
Engineering     633       119                   752  
Environmental     106       108                   214  
Community and government     3,075       273                   3,348  
Land, water use, and claims     3,734             121             3,855  
Project review                       6       6  
Site activities     769       414                   1,183  
Site administration     1,016       824       1             1,841  
Recognition of site closure provisions     15                         15  
    $ 10,180     $ 2,046     $ 127     $ 6     $ 12,359  

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Three months ended September 30, 2019   Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 24     $ 14     $     $     $ 38  
Drilling     287       5                   292  
Geological     252       31       6             289  
Engineering     194       4                   198  
Environmental     132       81                   213  
Community and government     892       111                   1,003  
Land, water use, and claims     774       119       81             974  
Project management     38                         38  
Project review                       27       27  
Site activities     370       9                   379  
Site administration     46       131                   177  
    $ 3,009     $ 505     $ 87     $ 27     $ 3,628  

 

Nine months ended September 30, 2019   Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 123     $ 37     $     $     $ 160  
Drilling     1,016       5                   1,021  
Geological     756       472       32             1,260  
Engineering     1,496       4                   1,500  
Environmental     449       81                   530  
Community and government     1,101       252                   1,353  
Land, water use, and claims     3,008       121       157             3,286  
Project management     131                         131  
Project review                       115       115  
Site activities     800       465                   1,265  
Site administration     353       909       2             1,264  
    $ 9,233     $ 2,346     $ 191     $ 115     $ 11,885  

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

6. EQUIPMENT

  

    Cost     Accumulated depreciation     Net book value  
    Begin of
year
    Changes
during
the
period
    Effect of
FX
    End of
period
    Begin of
year
    Changes
during
the
period
    Effect of
FX
    End of
period
    Begin
of year
    End of period  
Machinery and equipment   $ 324     $ 14     $ (18 )   $ 320     $ 205     $ 22     $ (4 )   $ 223     $ 119     $ 97  
Office equipment     36             (4 )     32       15       1       (1 )     15       21       17  
Computers and software     150       15       (8 )     157       96       21       (3 )     114       54       43  
Other equipment           2             2                                     2  
Vehicles     21       35       (1 )     55       2       6             8       19       47  
Buildings – leases     89             (2 )     87       18       20             38       71       49  
Total   $ 620     $ 66     $ (33 )   $ 653     $ 336     $ 70     $ (8 )   $ 398     $ 284     $ 255  

 

7. VALUE ADDED TAXES (“VAT”) RECOVERABLE

 

Our Mexican entities pay value-added taxes (called “IVA” in Mexico) on certain goods and services we purchase.

 

We also paid approximately 72 million Mexican pesos (approximately $3,860,000) of IVA on the initial acquisition of the Camino Rojo project, which is classified within exploration and evaluation assets as part of acquisition cost (note 5(a) and 5(d)).

 

IVA paid in Mexico is fully recoverable. However, IVA recovery returns in Mexico are subject to complex filing requirements and detailed audit or review by the fiscal authorities. Consequently, the timing of receipt of refunds is uncertain. Accordingly, we have classified Mexican IVA recoverable as long term.

 

8. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

 

    September 30,
2020
    December 31,
2019
 
Trade payables   $ 964     $ 492  
Payroll related liabilities     233       208  
Lease obligations – current     25       23  
Interest payable on Camino Rojo project loan           79  
    $ 1,222     $ 802  

 

9. CAMINO ROJO PROJECT LOAN

 

In December 2019, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) and certain other lenders with respect to a credit debt facility of US$125 million for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (the “Credit Facility”).

 

The Credit Facility provides a total of US$125 million to the Company, available in three tranches. The first tranche of US$25 million was drawn down by the Company on December 18, 2019 upon execution of the definitive loan documentation. The second and third tranches provide US$50 million each, available for drawdown after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of certain key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo project.

  

Subsequent to the reporting period, the Company drew upon the second tranche of this Credit Facility.

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

The Credit Facility is denominated in United States dollars, and bears interest at 8.80% per annum, payable quarterly commencing March 31, 2020, and is secured by all the assets of the Camino Rojo Project and the fixed assets of the Cerro Quema Project. The principal amount is due upon maturity at December 18, 2024, with no scheduled principal re-payments prior to maturity. The Company may prepay the loan, in full or in part, at any time during the term without penalty, by using cash flow from operations. The Credit Facility does not impose on the Company any mandatory requirements of hedging, production payments, offtake, streams, or royalties.

  

On December 18, 2019, the Company issued 32.5 million common share purchase warrants (with an exercise price of C$3.00 per warrant and expiry date of December 18, 2026) to the lenders in connection with the closing of the Credit Facility.

  

    Nine months
ended
September 30, 2020
    Year
ended
December 31, 2019
 
Balance, beginning of year   $ 12,961     $  
Amounts drawn down during the period           25,000  
Cash transaction costs     (35 )     (3,158 )
Warrants issued to the lenders           (8,968 )
Amortization of the transaction costs     283       86  
Foreign exchange     236       1  
Balance, end of period   $ 13,445     $ 12,961  

 

10. NEWMONT LOAN

 

As part of the Company’s acquisition of the Camino Rojo project from Newmont, Newmont agreed to provide interest-free loans to the Company for all the annual landholding costs on the Camino Rojo project from November 7, 2017 until December 31, 2019. The loans are to be repaid upon declaration of commencement of commercial production of a heap leach operation at the Camino Rojo Project. To the date of these financial statements, 219,446,000 pesos had been advanced by Newmont under this agreement. No further advances in respect of this loan are expected.

 

The original agreement provided that the Company may, at its option, repay any amounts owing to Newmont, prior to maturity, in the form of (a) a lump sum cash payment, (b) the issuance of additional common shares of the Company, or (c) a combination of cash and shares (subject to certain maximum ownership limits). During the reporting period, the Company agreed with Newmont that the repayment would be made in cash.

 

Because the loan is non-interest bearing, for accounting purposes at the date of each advance, we discount the expected payments using a risk-adjusted discount rate and an estimated repayment date. Amounts received in excess of fair value on the date of the advances were credited to exploration expense.

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

    Mexican pesos
 (thousands)
    Mexican pesos
(thousands)
    US dollars
(thousands)
 
    Undiscounted     Discounted        
At January 1, 2019     121,865       87,917     $ 4,475  
Advances received     97,601       72,897       3,676  
Accretion during the year           21,886       1,104  
Foreign exchange                 392  
At December 31, 2019     219,466       182,700     $ 9,647  
Accretion year to date           21,134       974  
Modification gains arising from changes in estimates           (22,093 )     (1,019 )
Foreign exchange                 (1,509 )
At September 30, 2020     219,466       181,741     $ 8,093  

 

11. SITE CLOSURE PROVISIONS

 

    Camino Rojo
Project
    Cerro Quema
Project
    Total  
At December 31, 2019   $ 232     $ 343     $ 575  
At September 30, 2020   $ 215     $ 343     $ 558  

 

12. INTEREST AND FINANCE COSTS

 

    Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
    2020     2019     2020     2019  
Accretion on Camino Rojo project loan (note 9)   $ 646     $     $ 1,950     $  
Accretion on Newmont loan (note 10)     917       481       974       805  
Interest expense on leases     1       2       4       3  
Interest income     (61 )     (16 )     (210 )     (85 )
    $ 1,503     $ 467     $ 2,718     $ 723  

 

13. SHARE CAPITAL

 

(a) Issued share capital

 

On April 3, 2020, the Company closed an equity financing of 36,600,000 common shares at a price of C$2.05 per common share for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of C$75,030,000 ($54,959,000).

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company issued:

 

· 2,013,050 common shares pursuant to the exercise of warrants for proceeds of $2,806,000 (note 13(b)).

· 1,837,103 common shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options for proceeds of $1,689,000 (note 14(a)).

· 414,060 common shares pursuant to the vesting of RSUs (note 14(b)).

· 1,000,000 common shares pursuant to the vesting of bonus shares (note 14(d)).

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Warrants

 

The following summarizes information about the number of warrants outstanding during the period.

 

Expiry date   Exercise
price
    December 31
2019
    Issued     Exercised     September 30
2020
 
February 15, 2021   C$ 2.35       8,790,600             (963,050 )     7,827,550  
July 8, 2021   C$ 0.62       570,000             (200,000 )     370,000  
June 12, 2022   C$ 1.65       5,842,500             (850,000 )     4,992,500  
November 7, 2022   C$ 1.40       3,000,000                   3,000,000  
December 18, 2026   C$ 3.00       32,500,000                   32,500,000  
Total number of warrants             50,703,100             (2,013,050 )     48,690,050  
                                         
Weighted average exercise price           C$ 2.61           C$ 1.88     C$ 2.64  

 

14. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

 

The Company has four different forms of share-based payments for eligible recipients – stock options, restricted share units (“RSUs”), deferred share units (“DSUs”), and bonus shares.

 

Share based payments expense   Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
    2020     2019     2020     2019  
Stock options   $ 554     $ 246     $ 1,330     $ 1,251  
Restricted share units     151       122       410       296  
Deferred share units           85       218       275  
Bonus shares           127       131       373  
Share based payments expense   $ 705     $ 580     $ 2,089     $ 2,195  

 

Page 15

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

  

(a) Stock options

 

Stock options outstanding

 

  Number     Weighted
average
exercise price
 
As at January 1, 2019     9,124,005     C$ 1.23  
Granted     2,199,322       1.08  
Exercised     (1,358,491 )     1.16  
Expired or cancelled     (47,500 )     1.48  
As at December 31, 2019     9,917,336       1.20  
Granted     2,233,438       2.91  
Exercised     (1,837,103 )     1.23  
Expired, forfeited or cancelled     (78,744 )     1.17  
As at September 30, 2020     10,234,927     C$ 1.57  
                 
Vested, December 31, 2019     7,229,622     C$ 1.22  
Vested, September 30, 2020     7,715,687     C$ 1.37  

 

The options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 had an aggregate grant date fair value of $2,015,000 (C$2,729,000) which was determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

 

· Expected volatility 48%, expected life 5 years, Canadian dollar risk free interest rate 0.5%, dividends nil.

 

The options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 had an aggregate grant date fair value of $737,000 (C$932,000) which was determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

· expected volatility 50%, expected life 5 years, Canadian dollar risk free interest rate 1.5%, dividends nil.

  

Subsequent to the reporting period, 175,000 stock options were exercised, for gross proceeds to the Company of $19,980.

 

(b) Restricted Share Units

 

Number of RSUs outstanding:   Total     Number vesting in the year  
    number     2020     2021     2022     2023  
Outstanding, December 31, 2019     1,014,972       365,882       365,880       283,210        
Awarded during the period     320,447             106,818       106,815       106,814  
Settled or cancelled during the period     (414,063 )     (365,882 )     (24,091 )     (24,090 )      
Outstanding, September 30, 2020     921,356             448,607       365,935       106,814  

 

RSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares immediately prior to award.

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(c) Deferred Share Units

 

DSUs outstanding:      
    Number  
Outstanding, December 31, 2019     508,780  
Awarded     135,745  
Outstanding, September 30, 2020     644,525  

 

DSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares immediately prior to award.

 

(d) Bonus shares

 

Bonus shares outstanding:      
    Number  
Outstanding, December 31, 2019     1,500,000  
Vested and issued during the period     (1,000,000 )
Outstanding, September 30, 2020     500,000  
Vested, September 30, 2020     500,000  

 

During 2017, the Board of Directors awarded 500,000 common shares to the non-executive Chairman of the Company as bonus shares. The bonus shares are subject to a vesting period from June 19, 2017 to June 18, 2020 (the “Eligibility Period”). If the non-executive Chairman ceases to be the director of the Company before the Eligibility Period ends, the bonus shares will be forfeited. The bonus shares will become issuable (1) after the Eligibility Period on the date that the non-executive Chairman ceases to act as a director of the Company, or (2) upon a change of control of the Company.

 

We estimated the fair value of the bonus shares ($1.31 each) based on the market price of the common shares at the date of the grant. The amount of $655,000 was recognized on a straight line basis over the Eligibility Period.

 

On November 13, 2018, the Board of Directors awarded 1,000,000 bonus shares to an officer of the Company. The bonus shares were structured in four tranches of 250,000 bonus shares each, vesting and issuable upon the achievement of certain share price thresholds particular to each tranche. Upon initial recognition we estimated the dates that each of these market condition tranches would vest, such dates ranging from December 2019 to March 2022. The award date fair value ($537,000, or $0.537 per bonus share) is recognized on a straight line basis over the estimated vesting periods. During the three months ended June 30, 2020, two of these tranches vested and the bonus shares were issued. The third and fourth tranches of 250,000 each vested during the three months ended September 30, 2020 and the bonus shares were issued. Consequently, the total fair value has been recognized as at September 30, 2020.

 

15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company’s related parties include:

 

Related party   Nature of the relationship
Key management personnel   Key management personnel are the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and members of the Board of Directors of the Company.

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(a) Key Management Personnel

 

Compensation to key management personnel was as follows:

 

    Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
    2020     2019     2020     2019  
Short term incentive plans                                
Salaries   $ 197     $ 314     $ 929     $ 945  
Directors’ fees     43       45       127       114  
      240       359       1,056       1,059  
Share based payments     271       531       1,390       1,801  
Total   $ 511     $ 890     $ 2,446     $ 2,860  

 

(b) Transactions

 

The Company had no other material transactions with related parties, other than with key management personnel as described above, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, or during the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

(c) Outstanding balances at the Reporting Date

 

At September 30, 2020, estimated accrued short term incentive compensation to key management personnel totaled $403,000 and was included in accrued liabilities (December 31, 2019 – $540,000).

 

16. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

(a) Non-cash activities

 

The non-cash investing and financing activities of the Company include the following:

 

    Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
    2020     2019     2020     2019  
Financing activities                                
Stock options exercised, credited to share capital with an offset to reserves     1,174       329       1,352       329  
Warrants exercised, credited to share capital with an offset to reserves     228       1,402       499       1,535  
Shares issued on maturity of RSUs, credited to share capital with offset to reserves     46       5       335       167  
Shares issued on vesting of bonus shares, credited to share capital with offset to reserves     36             394        

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Cash and cash equivalents

 

Cash consists of the following:

 

    September 30,
2020
    September 30,
2019
 
Bank current accounts and cash on hand   $ 41,743     $ 3,876  

 

17. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

(a) Reportable segments

 

The operating segments of the Company are based on the reports which are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in making strategic resource allocation decisions. These operating segments are the Panamanian projects, the Mexican projects, and the corporate office. The projects are each managed by a dedicated General Manager and management team. Additionally, the corporate office oversees the plans and activities of early stage exploration projects, such as the Monitor Gold project.

 

None of these segments yet generate revenue from external customers, and each of the projects are focused on the exploration and evaluation of mineral properties.

 

(b) Geographic segments

 

We conduct our activities in four geographic areas: Mexico, Panama, the United States, and Canada.

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At September 30, 2020                                        
Equipment   $ 159     $ 32     $     $ 64     $ 255  
Exploration and evaluation assets     36,180       82,429       314             118,923  

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At December 31, 2019                                        
Equipment   $ 140     $ 48     $     $ 96     $ 284  
Exploration and evaluation assets     42,900       82,429       314             125,643  

 

18. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

 

Our objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the exploration, evaluation, and development of our mineral properties and to maintain a flexible capital structure. In the management of capital, we include long term loans and share capital.

 

There was no change to our policy for capital management during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020.

 

We manage our capital structure and adjust it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the Company’s capital structure, we may issue new shares, take on additional debt, acquire or dispose of assets, or adjust the amount of cash and short-term investments. To maximize ongoing development efforts, we do not currently pay dividends.

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

At the end of 2019, we entered into a Credit Facility (note 9) in respect of the Camino Rojo project pursuant to which we have drawn $25 million of a total available $125 million. The Credit Facility requires us to maintain a minimum working capital of $5 million.

 

Our investment policy is to invest the Company’s excess cash in low risk financial instruments such as term deposits and higher yield savings accounts with major Canadian banks. By using this strategy, the Company preserves its cash resources and is able to marginally increase these resources through the yields on these investments. Our financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks, which include currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk.

 

Our ability to carry out our long-range strategic objectives in future years depends on our ability to generate positive cash flows from our mining operations and to raise financing from lenders, shareholders, and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing exploration and development activities.

 

19. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

(a) Fair value hierarchy

 

To provide an indication of the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, we classify our financial instruments into the three levels prescribed by the accounting standards.

 

  Level 1 The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded equity securities) is based on quoted (unadjusted) market prices as at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Company is the closing trading price on the reporting date. Such instruments are included in Level 1.
     
  Level 2 The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, we include that instrument in Level 2.
     
  Level 3 If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3. We have no financial assets or liabilities included in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

At September 30, 2020, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying
value
    Quoted
prices in
active
market for
identical
assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Approximate
fair value
due to short
term nature
of the
instrument
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                                    
Cash and cash equivalents   FVTPL   $ 41,743     $ 41,743     $     $           —     $          —     $ 41,743  
Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     64                         64       64  
Restricted funds   Amortized cost     383             383                   383  
        $ 42,190       41,743     $ 383     $     $ 64     $ 42,190  
                                                     
Financial liabilities                                                    
Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 964     $     $     $     $ 964     $ 964  
Lease obligation   Amortized cost     47             47                   47  
Camino Rojo project loan   Amortized cost     13,445             13,445                   25,000  
Newmont loan   Amortized cost     8,093             8,093                   8,538  
        $ 22,549     $     $ 21,585     $     $ 964     $ 34,549  

 

The fair value of the Newmont loan at September 30, 2020 was estimated at $8.5 million using an exchange rate of 22.4573 MXN/USD and a discount rate of 10.6%.

 

At December 31, 2019, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying
value
    Quoted
prices in
active
market for
identical
assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Approximate
fair value
due to short
term nature
of the
instrument
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                                    
Cash and cash equivalents   FVTPL   $ 23,106     $ 23,106     $     $         —     $          —     $ 23,106  
Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     18                         18       18  
Restricted funds   Amortized cost     509             509                   509  
        $ 23,633       23,106     $ 509     $     $ 18     $ 23,633  
                                                     
Financial liabilities                                                    
Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 802     $     $     $     $ 802     $ 802  
Lease obligation   Amortized cost     67                         67       67  
Camino Rojo project loan   Amortized cost     12,961             12,961                   12,961  
Newmont loan   Amortized cost     9,647             9,647                   9,647  
        $ 23,477     $     $ 22,608     $     $ 869     $ 23,477  

 

Our policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the reporting period.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

(a) Commitments

 

During the period ended September 30, 2020, the Company issued purchase orders for long lead equipment necessary for the construction of the Camino Rojo mine. At September 30, 2020, these outstanding purchase orders and contracts totaled approximately $47,300,000 (December 31, 2019 – $2,483,000), which we expect will be filled within the next 12 months.

 

In the event of a change in control, the Company is committed to severance payments amounting to approximately $2,860,000 (December 31, 2019 – $2,020,000) to certain officers and management. No amounts have been recorded in these consolidated financial statements to reflect such severance payments.

 

(b) Litigation

 

We may, from time to time, be a party to legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that, if resolved against us, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

21. EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

 

(a) Share Issuances

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, the Company drew on the second tranche of the Camino Rojo project loan (note 9) and issued common shares from the exercise of stock options (note 14(a)).

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

22. EFFECT OF THE CHANGE IN PRESENTATION CURRENCY

 

The effects of the change in presentation currency discussed in note 3 above were as follows.

 

(a) Effect on the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2019

 

    December 31, 2019     January 1, 2019  
    USD     CAD     USD     CAD  
ASSETS                                
Current assets                                
Cash and cash equivalents   US$ 23,106     C$ 30,009     US$ 12,234     C$ 16,686  
Accounts receivable     94       122       282       385  
Prepaid expenses     53       64       151       206  
      23,253       30,195       12,667       17,277  
Restricted funds     509       662       150       205  
Value added taxes recoverable     1,340       1,747       622       849  
Equipment     284       370       252       344  
Exploration and evaluation assets     125,643       163,383       124,099       169,282  
TOTAL ASSETS   US$ 151,029     C$ 196,357     US$ 137,790     C$ 187,957  
                                 
LIABILITIES                                
Current liabilities                                
Trade and other payables   US$ 802     C$ 1,042     US$ 1,278     C$ 1,743  
Accrued liabilities     1,578       2,049       1,405       1,916  
      2,380       3,091       2,683       3,659  
Lease obligations     44       57              
Camino Rojo project loan     12,961       16,833              
Newmont loan     9,647       12,573       4,475       6,103  
Accrued liabilities – long term     261       338              
Site closure provisions     575       748       626       745  
TOTAL LIABILITIES     25,868       33,640       7,784       10,507  
                                 
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                                
Share capital     159,230       208,186       153,852       201,077  
Reserves     30,061       39,348       19,931       25,960  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     (1,027 )     (1,036 )     (3,393 )     4,797  
Accumulated deficit     (63,103 )     (83,781 )     (40,384 )     (54,384 )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY     125,161       162,717       130,006       177,450  
                                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   US$ 151,029     C$ 196,357     US$ 137,790     C$ 187,957  

 

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Effect on the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2019

 

    Nine months ended
September 30, 2019
 
    USD     CAD  
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENSES                
Assays and analysis   US$ 160     C$ 213  
Drilling     1,021       1,358  
Geological     1,260       1,675  
Engineering     1,500       1,993  
Environmental     530       706  
Community and government     1,353       1,867  
Land and water use, claims and concessions     3,286       4,302  
Project management     131       174  
Project review     115       153  
Site activities     1,265       1,682  
Site administration     1,264       1,679  
      11,885       15,802  
                 
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES                
Office and administrative     381       506  
Professional fees     374       496  
Regulatory and transfer agent     95       126  
Salaries and benefits     1,256       1,670  
      2,106       2,798  
                 
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)                
Depreciation     72       96  
Share based payments     2,195       2,918  
Interest and finance costs     723       961  
Foreign exchange loss (gain)     19       27  
      3,009       4,002  
                 
LOSS FOR THE YEAR   US$ 17,000     C$ 22,602  
                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME)                
Items that may in future periods be reclassified to profit or loss:                
Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations     (305 )     4,805  
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS   US$ 16,695     C$ 27,407  
                 
                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions)     181.4       181.4  
                 
Loss per share - basic and diluted   US$ 0.09     C$ 0.12  

 

Page 24

 

 

Exhibit 99.03

 

 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

 

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020

 

 

Amounts in United States dollars

 

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020   United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

I.            Overview

 

Orla Mining Ltd. is a mineral exploration and development company which trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol OLA. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries.

 

Our corporate strategy is to acquire, develop and operate mineral properties where our expertise can substantially increase shareholder value. We have two material gold projects with near-term production potential based on open pit mining and heap leaching – the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project located in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema Gold Project located in Los Santos Province, Panama.

 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the quarter end September 30, 2020. You can find additional information regarding the Company, including our Annual Information Form, on SEDAR1 under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com.

 

All monetary amounts herein are expressed in United States dollars ($ or US$) unless otherwise stated. C$ refers to Canadian dollars.

 

This MD&A is current as of November 12, 2020.

 

Hans Smit, P.Geo, is the Qualified Person, as the term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). He has reviewed and approved the technical information disclosed in this MD&A.

 

II.            HIGHLIGHTS

 

During the quarter ended September 30, 2020, and to the date of this MD&A:

 

A. CAMINO ROJO OXIDE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

 

· During the quarter, the Company’s Environmental Impact Statement (“Manifestos de Impacto Ambiental” or “MIA”) was granted approval from the Mexican Federal Environmental Department ("SEMARNAT") for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (“Camino Rojo”) located in Zacatecas State, Mexico.

 

· Current construction activities include mobilization of the earthworks contractor, installation of the construction camp and offices, drilling water wells and site fence erection. The power line to site has been approved by the federal electricity commission and construction is currently underway ahead of schedule.

 

· The next phase of construction will be the earthworks. As a condition of the MIA, Orla submitted a Technical Economic Study to SEMARNAT on August 27, 2020. SEMARNAT is reviewing this Technical Economic Study, and upon acceptance, they will determine the amount of the environmental bond required to be placed. Earthworks can commence once we place the required environmental bond.

 

· At September 30, 2020, detailed engineering was 87% complete and amounts committed for equipment and contracts totaled $77 million to date.

 

· Major contracts for earth moving and civil works have been awarded. Earthworks can start once the required environmental bond is in place.

 

· Process plant equipment, including crusher and conveyors, is expected to start arriving on site in November 2020.

 

 

1 SEDAR is the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval, a filing system operated by the Canadian Securities Administrators, accessible at: www.sedar.com

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020   United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

B. Financing and Corporate

 

· The receipt of the MIA satisfied one of the key conditions precedent to the drawdown of the remaining $100 million available on the previously announced $125 million project finance facility (“Credit Facility”).

 

· Cash and cash equivalents balance on September 30, 2020 of $42 million.

 

· Drawdown of $50 million for the second tranche of the Credit Facility occurred on October 30, 2020.

 

· Appointed Sean Spraggett as the General Manager, Panama, in July 2020.

 

· Appointed Sylvain Guerard as the Senior Vice President, Exploration, in August 2020.

 

C. Exploration and Other Project Development

 

· A trenching program was completed in Mexico during the third quarter while a 6,000-meter reverse circulation (“RC”) drill program is 50% complete. Drilling will continue in the fourth quarter. A geophysics program consisting of 238 kilometres (“km”) of induced polarization (“IP”) lines was started and will continue in the fourth quarter.

 

· In Panama, the Company continued work on the Cerro Quema Pre-Feasibility Study update. Specific ongoing workflows include resource modelling, process and metallurgy design, geotechnical drilling, hydrology testing, and environmental study and review. The geotechnical drilling to support the study began during the third quarter.

 

· A regional exploration drilling program in Panama is planned for the fourth quarter and will focus on the areas of La Pelona, Sombrero, Idaida and Caballito. Resource work continues on the Caballito copper-gold discovery.

 

COVID-19 Global health emergency

 

The global outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) in 2020 has had a significant impact on businesses through restrictions put in place by governments around the world, including the jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. Our activities have been restricted by government orders related to, among others, travel, business operations, and stay-at-home orders. As of the date of this MD&A, it is not possible to determine the extent of the impact that this global health emergency will have on our activities as the impacts will depend on future developments which themselves are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence. These uncertainties arise from the inability to predict the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, its extent and intensity, the duration of the outbreak, and possible government, societal, and individual responses to the situation.

 

On March 20, 2020, Orla suspended all activities at the Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema projects due to government mandated stay-at-home orders issued in response to the COVID-19 Global Health Emergency. Both operations have established COVID-19 committees that meet regularly to discuss operational protocols and safety measures and update as necessary.

 

Authorization to resume activities at Camino Rojo was received from the Mexican health authorities on May 23, 2020 after a plan was presented and all requirements had been met for a safe return to work. Government offices have resumed reviewing permit applications, although at a reduced capacity. Procurement and detailed engineering work continue on a remote basis. However, should there be changes to the current situation, our construction schedule and consequently our timing to production may be affected.

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

On June 1, 2020, the Panamanian government announced Block 2 of re-opening, which includes the mining industry. We submitted COVID-19 protocols for the re-opening of site operations and on July 8, 2020 we received approval from the Ministry of Health of Panama for a gradual re-opening of activities. In September 2020 the government moved to Block 4 of its reopening plan, lifting in-country travel restrictions, allowing hotels to open and domestic air travel. On October 12, 2020 international travel resumed. Exploration activities restarted in September 2020 and drilling started in October.

 

Return-to-work plans and protocols have been implemented at Cerro Quema, Panama, and Camino Rojo, Mexico, and approved by the health authorities. The Company has implemented strict COVID-19 protocols, including rigorous screening and testing programs at the site operations.

 

We continue to maintain robust organization-wide COVID-19 prevention protocols to support the health of our employees and local communities. Orla is closely monitoring the potential impacts from the pandemic on areas including equipment delivery and logistics, construction costs and schedule, as well as community and government relations.

 

III.            OUTLOOK AND UPCOMING MILESTONES

 

We remain focused on advancing the Company’s strategic objectives and near-term milestones, which include the following:

 

· Continue to maintain robust organization-wide COVID-19 prevention protocols to support the health of our employees and local communities.

 

· Continue safe and controlled mobilization at Camino Rojo as part of project construction.

 

· Complete Layback Agreement with Fresnillo for the Camino Rojo Oxide Project.

 

· Advance exploration programs at Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema.

 

· Progress Camino Rojo Sulphide Project studies.

 

· Update the Pre-Feasibility Study at Cerro Quema Oxide Project.

 

· Release a maiden mineral resource estimate for the Caballito discovery at Cerro Quema in Panama.

 

IV.            DISCUSSION OF OPERATIONS

 

A. Camino Rojo, Mexico

 

Project Description and History

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine and consists of seven concessions covering in aggregate 163,127 hectares. Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with untested exploration potential.

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Canplats Resources Corporation (“Canplats”) initially discovered gold-silver mineralization at Camino Rojo in 2007, and subsequently completed 39,725 metres of drilling, largely delineating the shallow oxide mineralization. Canplats also carried out metallurgical studies prior to being acquired by Newmont in 2010. Newmont then completed more than 250,000 metres of drilling, conducted airborne and ground geophysical surveys, did extensive geological and mineralogical investigations, and conducted numerous metallurgical studies, which included detailed mineralogical studies, column leach tests on oxide material, size fraction analysis, variability test work and sulphide flotation studies.

 

The Ejido San Tiburcio holds the surface rights over the main area of known mineralization. Exploration has been carried out under the authority of agreements between the project operators and the Ejido San Tiburcio. There is a 30-year temporary occupation agreement in place with the Ejido San Tiburcio, with the right to expropriate, covering all the area of the mineral resource and area of potential development described in the “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated effective June 25, 2019 (the “Camino Rojo Report”). Other temporary occupation agreements allow surface access for exploration activities in various other parts of the concession package. The Company has water rights in the area of the proposed development.

 

In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc.1 (now, “Newmont”). A 2% net smelter return royalty on the sale of all metal production from the oxide material at Camino Rojo (the “Oxide Royalty”) was granted to Newmont as part of the acquisition.

 

The Company and Newmont also entered into an option agreement regarding the potential development of sulphide operations at Camino Rojo. Pursuant to the option agreement, Newmont will, subject to the applicable sulphide project meeting certain thresholds, have an option to acquire a 60% or 70% interest in the applicable sulphide project (“Sulphide Option”). Where Newmont decides not to exercise its Sulphide Option, a 2% net smelter return royalty will be granted on metal production from sulphide material (the “Sulphide Royalty”). On September 21, 2020, Newmont announced that it had entered into an agreement to sell the Oxide Royalty. Orla maintains a right of first refusal on the Oxide Royalty which expires on December 20, 2020.

 

The Company has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. However, if sulphide projects are defined through one or more positive pre-feasibility studies with development scenarios either (i) exceeding 500 million tonnes of proven and probable reserves developed as a standalone operation, or (ii) using the existing infrastructure at the Peñasquito mine, Newmont would have an option to enter into a joint venture with Orla at a 60% or 70% level, respectively, for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of such a sulphide project. Upon meeting one of the development scenario criteria, if Newmont then chooses to exercise its option, Orla’s share of the costs to develop a sulphide project would be, at Orla’s option, carried to production by Newmont. If Newmont acquires a portion of a sulphide project in the future through the exercise of its option, Orla will retain a right of first refusal on the future sale by Newmont of any portion of that sulphide project. The Camino Rojo Asset Purchase Agreement was filed on SEDAR on June 28, 2017. Details of the joint venture are available in our news release dated November 7, 2017, which is available here.

 

On June 24, 2019, we issued the results of a positive Feasibility Study along with a mineral reserve estimate on the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project. The Feasibility Study supports a technically simple open-pit mine and heap-leach operation with low capital and operating costs providing rapid payback and a strong financial return. An independent technical report prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 is available at www.sedar.com under Orla's profile and on our website at www.orlamining.com.

 

 

1 Goldcorp Inc. is a predecessor company to Newmont, prior to April 18, 2019. Newmont is a publicly traded company resulting from the combination of Newmont Mining Corporation and Goldcorp Inc., effective April 18, 2019.

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

The Camino Rojo Feasibility Study considers near-surface open pit mining of 44.0 million tonnes of oxide and transitional ore at a throughput rate of 18,000 tonnes per day for an average life of mine gold production of 97,000 ounces annually. Ore from the pit will be crushed to 80% passing 28 mm, conveyor stacked onto a heap leach pad and leached using a low concentration sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant where gold and silver will be precipitated and doré will be produced. The site's proximity to infrastructure, low stripping ratio, compact footprint and flat pad location all contribute to project simplicity, low initial capital of $123 million and low estimated all-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) of $576 per ounce of gold.

 

The Feasibility Study was prepared by a team of independent industry experts led by Kappes Cassiday and Associates ("KCA") and supported by Independent Mining Consultants ("IMC"), Resource Geosciences Incorporated ("RGI"), Barranca Group LLC, Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., and HydroGeoLogica Inc. (“HGL”).

 

The Feasibility Study incorporates geological, assay, engineering, metallurgical, geotechnical, environmental, and hydrogeological information collected by Orla and previous owners since 2007, including 370,566 metres of drilling in 911 holes. Predicted average gold recoveries of 64% are based on results from 85 column tests.

 

Operating costs are based on contract mining with all other mine components being owned and operated by Orla. Capital costs were estimated using budgetary supplier quotes for all major and most minor equipment as well as contractor quotes for major construction contracts.

 

The proposed mine is located 3 kilometres from a paved four lane highway and approximately 190 kilometres from the city of Zacatecas. The area is flat and there are no known social or environmental impediments to mining. Orla has all surface, mineral and water rights required to develop the project as presented in the Feasibility Study and existing wells produce in excess of the average 24 litres per second of water required for the project.

 

There are no residents within the area of proposed development. The town of San Tiburcio is located 4 kilometres to the east of the proposed development. Orla has a Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement with the Ejido San Tiburcio and a 30-year temporary occupation agreement with an expropriation right over the 2,497 hectares covering the proposed pit and infrastructure area. Orla has an active community and social program in San Tiburcio and other nearby communities of El Berrendo and San Francisco de los Quijano.

 

Government review of the documents required to obtain an operating permit was delayed by COVID-19 closures and the final permit was received in August 2020. The approval of the MIA is conditional upon Orla meeting certain customary conditions and standard requirements, which the Company has completed and submitted to SEMARNAT and is awaiting confirmation. Orla now has the two principal permits necessary and construction activities that do not involve significant ground disturbance have been initiated. Current construction activities include mobilization of the earthworks contractor, installation of the construction camp and offices, drilling water wells and site fence erection. The power line to site has been approved by the federal electricity commission and construction is currently underway. Detailed engineering is nearly complete. Procurement remains on track and we expect first gold production in the fourth quarter of 2021.

 

Mineral Reserves

 

Camino Rojo comprises intrusive related, sedimentary strata hosted, polymetallic gold, silver, arsenic, zinc, and lead mineralization. The mineralized zones correspond to zones of sheeted sulphidic veins and veinlet networks, creating a bulk-mineable style of gold mineralization. Mineralization is almost completely oxidized to a depth of approximately 120 metres and then variably oxidized below (transitional to sulphide). The mineral resource estimate was divided into oxide, high and low transitional, and sulphide material. Only the oxide and transitional material were considered in the Feasibility Study for heap leach extraction.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The mineral reserve estimate for Camino Rojo is based on an open pit mine plan and mine production schedule developed by IMC. All mineral reserves are located on, and are accessible from, Orla's concessions and support the 6.8-year mine life.

 

The mineral reserve estimate at Camino Rojo includes proven and probable mineral reserves of 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne ("g/t") and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. All mineral reserves are contained and accessible from within Orla's mineral concessions.

 

Mineral Resources

 

As part of the Feasibility Study efforts, IMC updated the mineral resource estimate from the previous estimate prepared as of April 27, 2018 and previously reported in Orla's May 29, 2018 news release. Mineral resources were divided between oxide and transitional material that could possibly be extracted by open pit mine and processed in a heap leach operation ("Leach Resource") and sulphide material that could possibly be extracted by open pit and processed in a mill ("Mill Resource"). For the Mill Resource, estimates were made for contained gold, silver, lead, and zinc. As lead and zinc would not be recovered in a heap leach operation, only gold and silver were estimated for the Leach Resource.

 

Updated measured and indicated mineral resources, inclusive of mineral reserves, amount to 353.4 million tonnes at 0.83 g/t gold and 8.8 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 9.46 million ounces of gold and 100.4 million ounces of silver. Inferred mineral resources are 60.9 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold and 7.4 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 1.70 million ounces of gold and 14.5 million ounces of silver.

 

The mineral reserve and resource estimate for Camino Rojo is available in the Company’s Annual Information Form which was filed on SEDAR on March 23, 2020, and is also accessible on the Company’s website at www.orlamining.com. All the mineralization comprised in Orla’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by Fresnillo and that waste would be mined on Fresnillo’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on executing the Layback Agreement with Fresnillo, which addresses the oxide and transition portion of the mineral resources that are amendable to heap leaching, and a subsequent agreement addressing the sulphide mineral resources that are not amendable to heap leaching. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on the proposed Layback Agreement and a subsequent agreement being obtained with Fresnillo.

 

The Feasibility Study in the Camino Rojo Report was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on Fresnillo’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, the Layback Agreement with Fresnillo to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

Additional details on mineral reserve and resource assumptions, risks and data verification can be found in the independent technical report dated June 25, 2019 prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 and available at www.sedar.com under Orla's profile and on the Company’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Layback Agreement

 

On March 23, 2020, Orla announced that it had entered into a non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo as to the commercial terms on which the Corporation would obtain the right to expand the oxide pit at the Camino Rojo Project onto part of Fresnillo’s mineral concession located immediately to the north of Orla’s property under a proposed Layback Agreement. The proposed Layback Agreement will allow access to oxide and transitional heap leachable mineral resources on Orla’s property below the open pit outlined in the Camino Rojo Report. In addition, the Layback Agreement will provide Orla with the right to mine from Fresnillo’s mineral concession, and recover, for Orla’s account, all oxide and transitional material amenable to heap leaching that are within an expanded open pit.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Under the terms of the proposed Layback Agreement, Orla would pay Fresnillo a total cash consideration of $62.8 million based on the following schedule: (i) $10 million due upon the execution of the Layback Agreement; (ii) $15 million due upon Orla having received all funding and permits required for construction and development; or July 1, 2020, whichever is sooner (as both of these events have occurred, this term was subsequently revised to the date the Layback Agreement is entered into); (iii) $15 million due no later than (a) 12 months following the commencement of commercial production at the Camino Rojo Project or (b) December 1, 2022, whichever is earlier; and (iv) $22.8 million due no later than (a) 24 months following the commencement of commercial production at the Camino Rojo Project or (b) December 1, 2023, whichever is earlier. The amounts for the third and fourth payments shall bear an interest rate of 5% per annum from the date the Layback Agreement is entered into until the date of payment.

 

The non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo has a term of 12 months and remains subject to execution of the Layback Agreement between the parties, which is currently underway and expected during the fourth quarter of 2020. The proposed Layback Agreement will not preclude or restrict Fresnillo from participating in any future development of the sulphide mineral resource at the Camino Rojo Project.

 

There can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate the proposed Layback Agreement on terms that are satisfactory to us or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Delays in, or failure to obtain, the proposed Layback Agreement with Fresnillo to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a portion of the oxide and transitional mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to mineralized material at depth. We will require a different agreement with Fresnillo to develop the sulphide portion of the mineral resources. Should a subsequent agreement to access the sulphide mineral resource with Fresnillo not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

An update to the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project Feasibility Study is being prepared to include the layback area resulting in a larger oxide pit.

 

Permitting

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by SEMARNAT, the federal government department which has authority over the two principal permits: (1) the Environmental Impact Statement (“Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental” or “MIA”, accompanied by a Risk Study), and (2) a Change of Land Use permit (“CUS”) accompanied by a Technical Justification Study (“ETJ”).

 

In early 2018, Orla resumed environmental assessment activities on the project and surrounding area under the guidance of independent environmental permitting consultant Patricia Aguayo. Data from this work was used in conjunction with information collected by previous operators and project information collected from Orla's consulting engineers to prepare the documents needed to apply for the MIA and CUS permits. The project is not located in an area with any special federal environmental protection designation and no factors were identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required environmental permits.

 

We submitted permitting documents to SEMARNAT during the third quarter of 2019. We were notified that the CUS was accepted on December 12, 2019 and we paid the required fees on January 17, 2020. On August 13, 2020, the Company received approval of its MIA. The Company has received the two principal permits necessary for commencement of construction activities at Camino Rojo.

 

The approval of the MIA was conditional upon Orla meeting certain customary conditions and standard requirements. One of the conditions was the completion of a Technical Economic Study which was submitted to SEMARNAT on August 27, 2020. SEMARNAT is reviewing this Technical Economic Study, and upon acceptance, they will determine the amount of the environmental bond required to be placed. Earthworks can commence once we place the required environmental bond. All other conditions of the MIA have been met or submitted and we are awaiting confirmation from SEMARNAT.

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

We plan to build and operate the project in accordance with International Finance Corporation Performance Standards, as well as International Council on Mining and Metals principles. We have contracted ERM, a global consulting company, to review the environmental assessment and proposed mitigation measures for the project.

 

Development activities

 

Since submitting our permit applications in August 2019, we have focused our work on the detailed engineering and planning required to start construction in 2020. In September 2019, we awarded the engineering, procurement, and construction management (“EPCM”) contract for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project to M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation (“M3”), a full service EPCM firm headquartered in Tucson, Arizona.

 

As of September 30, 2020, approximately 87% of the detailed engineering had been completed. We have placed purchase orders for major equipment and materials and have made cash down payments totaling approximately $18 million for these items.

 

Additional activities completed during the quarter include:

 

· COVID-19 Emergency Committee continued to meet as part of monitoring the latest information on the pandemic, and to develop plans and protocols for the safe return to work.

· Continued detailed engineering.

 

Approximately 50% of the project has been committed for purchase orders and contracts. Total cash payments to date on the overall project amount to approximately $27 million.

 

Camino Rojo Project Loan

 

In December 2019, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) and certain other lenders with respect to a credit debt facility of $125 million for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility was arranged by Trinity Capital and includes a syndicate of lenders led by Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”), Pierre Lassonde, and Trinity Capital.

 

The Credit Facility provides a total of $125 million to the Company, available in three tranches. The first tranche of $25 million was drawn down by the Company on December 18, 2019 upon execution of the definitive loan documentation. The second tranche of $50 million was drawn down on October 30, 2020. The third and final tranche provides $50 million and must be drawn within six months of the second tranche. There is no guarantee that all conditions precedent and covenants will be met in a timely manner and failure to do so could delay or prevent further draws from the Credit Facility in the future.

 

Regional exploration

 

As well as development-related activities, we continue to conduct a regional exploration program. Work completed during the quarter included mechanical trenching, geophysical IP survey and RC drilling.

 

A mechanical trenching program (5 trenches) was completed at the Las Miserias target where previous prospecting work identified silicified breccias along a major fault named Cerros del Aire. This trenching work provided us with valuable geological and geochemical information to orient follow-up work including planned geophysical IP survey.

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Geophysical IP surveying was initiated on September 2, 2020 to cover prospective target areas supported by favourable geology, deformation, alteration, and anomalous geochemistry. A total of 72 km of IP lines were executed in September 2020 at the Las Miserias, Majoma and Hacheros targets.

 

A 6,400 metre RC drill program started on July 29, 2020, with 2,800 metres completed at the end of September 2020. The RC drilling has been performed at the Las Miserias target area to test a large IP chargeability anomaly lying under soil cover. A total of seven RC holes have been completed but no significant assay results have been reported. The IP anomaly appears to be generated by weak pyrite mineralization combined with high amount of water in some structures.

 

Community and social

 

We maintain an active community, social relations, and environmental management program. During the quarter, there were no environmental incidents. Community activities during the third quarter of 2020 were primarily focused on supporting our local communities and the challenges faced as result of COVID-19 impacts:

 

· Provided support to the local communities during the COVID-19 pandemic including the donation of food, medical and protective equipment;

· Provided training and educational materials regarding the coronavirus to local communities;

· Continued to provide support to the community in efforts to maintain a doctor assigned to the community.

 

At Camino Rojo, the Company is working in collaboration with various local service providers like truck drivers to ensure they have an opportunity to participate in construction activities. An updated database of local services and people available for work has been provided to our contractors as the Company seeks to encourage opportunities for local procurement and employment.

 

Orla’s community relations team continues to maintain communications with our local communities to understand how the Company can best support them. However, because of COVID-19 protocols which include necessary physical distancing, Orla has reduced direct contact with the local communities as a precautionary measure.

 

B. Cerro Quema Project, Panama

 

Project Description and History

 

Our 100%-owned Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open pit mine with process by heap leaching. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the areas of the current mineral resources and mineral reserves, proposed mine development, and the priority drill targets.

 

The Company owns the surface rights for land required to mine the Cerro Quema mineral reserves and to construct and operate a heap leach facility.

 

A predecessor company to Orla issued a mineral resource estimate and a Pre-Feasibility Study for Cerro Quema, and an independent technical report entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”1).

 

 

1 The “Cerro Quema Report” is an independent technical report for the Cerro Quema Project entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 prepared by Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA.

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Cerro Quema Report envisions a standard open pit mine with two pits, one at La Pava and one at Quemita, coupled with a 10,000 tonne per day heap leach facility to extract the gold. The project estimates average head grade of 0.77 g/t Au, crush size of 80% passing minus 50 mm, and an average gold recovery of 86%. This would result in 418,000 ounces of gold production over a 5.3-year mine life.

 

The Cerro Quema Report, which contains the 2014 mineral resource and mineral reserve estimate and Pre-Feasibility Study, was filed on SEDAR by Pershimco Resources Inc. on August 22, 2014. You can download it from SEDAR at www.sedar.com or from the Company’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Environmental and permitting

 

We have an ongoing environmental management plan that includes maintaining sediment dams, reforestation of previously disturbed areas and active sediment control activities. Baseline surface water quality sampling and groundwater level measurements are also ongoing.

 

Mineral concessions are comprised of three contracts between the Republic of Panama and Minera Cerro Quema SA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Orla. The original 20-year term for these concessions expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). The Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. As of the date of this MD&A, formal approval of the extension of these concessions has not yet been received. Since the expiry of the concessions, we have continued to receive ongoing exploration permits and the Ministry of Commerce has continued to accept our annual concession fees.

 

On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that it had received the extension applications, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal. We have received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. In October and November 2017, we received a permit for copper exploration, and two permits allowing temporary use of water for exploration drilling.

 

On May 8, 2018, we received a permit to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018, we received two permits to use water for drilling. In May 2018, an existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current mineral resources was extended for two years. In October 2018, the government accepted the payment our 2018 annual concession fees.

 

In February 2019, we paid the 2019 concession fees. On February 11, 2019, we received a new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions. All drill permits are currently active.

 

We received two additional temporary water permits on January 13, 2020. On February 3, 2020, we paid the annual concession fees, which were accepted.

 

Corporate Social Responsibility

 

We have an active community relations program that includes providing hot lunches to 5 to 15-year-old children studying in the 12 schools located within a 15-km radius of the Cerro Quema project. We also provide support for various local amateur sports teams, a youth orchestra, local fairs, and cultural events.

 

Exploration

 

On June 1, 2020, the Panamanian government announced Block 2 of re-opening, which includes the mining industry. We submitted COVID-19 protocols for the re-opening of site operations and on July 8, 2020 we received approval from the Ministry of Health of Panama for a gradual re-opening of activities. In September 2020, the government moved to Block 4, lifting in-country travel restrictions, allowing hotels to open and domestic air travel. On October 12, 2020, international travel resumed.

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Exploration drilling restarted on October 24, 2020. Current exploration activities are focused on advancing the Caballito copper-gold sulphide discovery and exploring for additional zones with similar mineralization. This style of mineralization, identified in 2018, presents potential value to the project in addition to the current heap-leach oxide gold project. The trend that hosts the Caballito mineralized zone, the Quemita deposit area and the Pelona target in the eastern part of the project provides prospective target areas for additional Caballito-style copper-gold (low-arsenic) mineralization.

 

Pre-Feasibility Study

 

We are in the process of updating the Cerro Quema Pre-Feasibility Study (“PFS”) on the oxide heap leach gold project initially completed in 2014. This will include updated mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates, mining plans, process plans, cost estimates, and additional geotechnical, environmental, and metallurgical investigations. Geotechnical drilling started in mid-September 2020.

 

C. Non-GAAP Measures

 

We have included herein certain performance measures (“non-GAAP measures”) which are not specified, defined, or determined under generally accepted accounting principles (in our case, International Financial Reporting Standards, or “IFRS”).

 

These are common performance measures in the gold mining industry, but because they do not have any mandated standardized definitions, they may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. Accordingly, we use such measures to provide additional information and you should not consider them in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

 

All-In Sustaining Costs ("AISC")

 

We have provided an AISC performance measure that reflects all the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, our definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. We believe that this measure is useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow from current operations. Subsequent amendments to the guidance have not materially affected the figures presented.

 

V.            SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

 

The figures in the following table are based on the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements which were prepared in accordance with IAS 34 of International Financial Reporting Standards.

 

Effective January 1, 2020, we changed our presentation currency to United States dollars. Internally, we budget in US dollars, report internally in US dollars, our project debt is denominated in US dollars, and our engineering and EPCM reports are presented in US dollars. We believe that presenting our financial information in US dollars is more useful to us internally to manage the business, and more useful to readers because of greater comparability and greater congruence with the underlying currencies of significant transactions.

 

Page 12

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

This change in the financial statement presentation currency is an accounting policy change and we have accounted for it retrospectively. The functional currencies of all our entities remained unchanged. We translated the income statements at the average exchange rates for each reporting period. We recognized exchange differences arising from translating our subsidiaries’ financial results to United States dollars in other comprehensive income.

 

$ thousands   2020-Q3     2020-Q2     2020-Q1     2019-Q4     2019-Q3     2019-Q2     2019-Q1     2018-Q4  
Exploration expense   $ 3,590     $ 1,166     $ 7,603       3,069       3,630       2,612       5,642       5,046  
General and administrative     162       194       185       150       97       83       201       140  
Professional fees     425       230       176       165       170       110       94       134  
Regulatory and transfer agent     11       66       82       111       30       34       31       158  
Salaries and wages     563       527       264       730       423       450       383       640  
Depreciation     23       25       22       6       25       25       22       40  
Share based payments     705       612       772       374       580       673       942       807  
Interest and finance costs     1,503       609       606       446       467       34       221       63  
Foreign exchange     1,688       (1,220 )     479       139             8       13       (88 )
Other gains and losses     (1,019 )                                          
Net loss     7,651       2,209       10,189       5,190       5,422       4,029       7,549       6,940  
Loss per share (basic and diluted)   $ 0.03     $ 0.01     $ 0.05     $ 0.03     $ 0.03     $ 0.02     $ 0.04     $ 0.04  

 

In 2020, we began detailed engineering for the mine at Camino Rojo, and during the third quarter we received the necessary permits to commence construction.

 

In 2019, we worked on, completed, and publicly filed the feasibility study for Camino Rojo. We commenced detailed engineering and planning for construction of Camino Rojo. Quarterly variations are due to seasonality and timing of mining concession fees, drilling activities and awaiting results from previous quarters’ exploration activities.

 

Administrative costs and professional fees have trended with the level of activity of the Company, and with major regulatory events such as financings and public listings. In 2018-Q4 we commenced trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange, and in 2019-Q4 we closed a $125 million project credit facility – both events caused one-time increases in regulatory fees and legal fees.

 

Salaries have generally increased in 2019 and into 2020 as we have grown our team in preparation for the construction phase at Camino Rojo. In 2018-Q4, we accrued for payments related to the departure of the former CEO. In 2019-Q4 we incurred payments related to the departure of the former COO.

 

Share based payments expense is generally related to the number of stock options and RSUs vesting during the quarter. The grants occurred during 2018-Q2, 2019-Q1, and 2020-Q1; consequently, those quarters tend to be greater than the others.

 

Interest income is directly related to cash on hand and prevailing interest rates.

 

The Company received $25 million in 2019-Q4 as a first draw on the Camino Rojo project loan, which caused an increase in interest expense, and we can expect larger swings in foreign exchange gains and losses, starting in that quarter. We incurred loan initiation costs and those are being amortized over the next five years.

 

Foreign exchange gains and losses vary based on fluctuation of the Canadian dollar and the Mexican peso versus the US dollar. Near the end of 2020-Q1, there were unusually large swings in the Canadian dollar to US dollar and the Mexican peso to US dollar exchange rates related to economic uncertainty arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

VI.            THIRD QUARTER OF 2020

 

The following table is based on accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Figures are expressed in thousands of United States dollars.

 

$ 000’s         Comparison to
last quarter
    Comparison to
same quarter last year
 
    2020-Q3     2020-Q2     Difference     2019-Q3     Difference  
Exploration expense   $ 3,590     $ 1,166     $ 2,424     $ 3,627     $ (37 )
General and administrative     162       194       (32 )     97       65  
Professional fees     425       230       195       170       255  
Regulatory and transfer agent     11       66       (55 )     30       (19 )
Salaries and wages     563       527       36       423       140  
Depreciation     23       25       (2 )     25       (2 )
Share based payments     705       612       93       580       125  
Interest and finance costs     1,503       609       894       466       1,037  
Foreign exchange     1,688       (1,220 )     2,908       1       1,687  
Other gains and losses     (1,019 )           (1,019 )           (1,019 )
Loss for the quarter   $ 7,651     $ 2,209     $ 5,442     $ 5,419     $ 2,232  

 

Exploration and evaluation expenses during the current quarter are higher than both the previous quarter and the same quarter of 2019. During 2020-Q2, many of our exploration and evaluation activities had been curtailed by COVID-related work slowdowns and stay-at-home orders. In 2020-Q3 we paid semi-annual land and water use fees, which costs did not occur in 2020-Q2.

 

During 2020-Q3 we increased our activities at Cerro Quema compared to last year as we prepare to conduct further exploration and work on the Cerro Quema pre-feasibility study update.

 

The increase in salaries and wages from previous quarters is due to the hiring of corporate personnel.

 

During the current quarter we segregated modification gains on the Newmont loan, which had in past been grouped with and included as part of accretion expense.

 

VII.            LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

The Company had working capital of approximately $38 million as at September 30, 2020, compared with $21 million at December 31, 2019. During the year to date, the Company has raised C$75 million in an equity financing, and approximately $2.8 million pursuant to the exercise of warrants, and a further $1.7 million pursuant to the exercise of stock options.

 

Historically the Company's primary source of funding has been the issuance of equity securities for cash, typically through private placements to sophisticated investors and institutions. We have issued common share capital in many of the past few years, pursuant to private placement financings and the exercise of warrants and options. Our access to exploration and construction financing is always uncertain, and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant equity or debt funding.

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

In December 2019, we entered into an agreement for a credit facility for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project. This agreement provides a total of $125 million to the Company, available in three tranches. We drew down the first tranche of $25 million in December 2019, and we drew down the second tranche of $50 million subsequent to the reporting period. Under the terms of the credit facility, the third tranche must be drawn within six months of the second tranche, being April 30, 2021. There remain certain conditions precedent which Orla must satisfy prior to drawing the third tranche.

 

Our ability to carry out our long-range strategic objectives in future periods depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders, and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing activities. We expect to fund the operating costs and the operating and strategic objectives of the Company over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand, and with further equity financings and draws from the Camino Rojo project loan.

 

The Company had material commitments for capital expenditures as of September 30, 2020. At September 30, 2020, outstanding commitments arising from unfilled purchase orders and contracts totalled approximately $47 million.

 

VIII.            OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements requiring disclosure under this section.

 

IX.            RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

We had no significant or unusual transactions with related parties. Refer to note 15 of the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements as and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020.

 

X.            CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

 

In preparing the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements, we have made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income, and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

We review estimates and their underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.

 

Judgements, estimates, and assumptions that we have made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements include:

 

Exploration and evaluation expenditures

 

The application of the Company’s accounting policy for E&E expenditure requires judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely from either future exploitation or sale (prior to which we expense all E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we capitalize the acquisition costs). It also requires us to make judgements on whether activities have reached a stage that permits development of the mineral resource (prior to which they are treated as E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we treat such costs as projects under development and construction).

 

Page 15

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

We apply a number of estimates and assumptions, such as the determination of the quantities and types of mineral resources, which itself involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on resource classification (measured, indicated, or inferred). These estimates directly impact accounting decisions related to our E&E expenditures.

 

We make certain estimates and assumptions about future events and circumstances; particularly, whether economic mineral exploitation is viable. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, we assess indicators of impairment and may conclude to write off such amounts to the statement of profit or loss.

 

Assessment of impairment indicators

 

We apply judgement in assessing whether indicators of impairment or reverse impairment exist for our E&E assets which could result in a test for impairment. We consider internal and external factors, such as our rights to explore, planned expenditures on E&E activities, the technical results of our E&E activities, and the potential for viable operations, to determine whether there are any indicators of impairment or reversal of a previous impairment.

 

Title to mineral properties

 

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. Further, we make judgements for properties where concessions terms have expired, and a renewal application has been made and is awaiting approval. We use judgement as to whether the concession renewal application is probable to be received, but ultimately this is beyond our control. If a renewal application is not approved, we could lose rights to those concession.

 

Functional currency

 

The functional currency for the parent entity and each of its subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of functional currency involves judgements to identify the primary economic environment. We reconsider the functional currency of each entity if there is a change in the underlying transactions, events, and conditions which we used to determine the primary economic environment of that entity.

 

XI.            FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is inherently exposed to certain financial risks, including market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk, through the use of financial instruments. The timeframe and the way we manage these risks varies based upon our assessment of these risks and available alternatives for mitigation. We do not acquire or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All transactions undertaken are to support our operations.

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

XII.            OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

 

As of the date of this MD&A, the Company had the following equity securities outstanding:

 

· 229,141,384 common shares

 

· 48,690,050 warrants

 

· 10,059,927 stock options

 

· 500,000 bonus shares (all of which had vested but had not yet been settled into common shares)

 

· 921,356 restricted share units

 

· 644,525 deferred share units

 

You can find further details about these potentially issuable securities in the notes to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020.

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

XIII.            RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

 

As the Company has not commenced principal operations, historical revenue and expenditure trends are not indicative of future activity. The Company has committed to certain work expenditures and may enter into future agreements. The ability of the Company to fund its future operations and commitments is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing. Risks of the Company’s business include the following:

 

Permits and Licenses

 

The exploitation and development of mineral properties may require the Company to obtain regulatory or other permits and licenses from various governmental licensing bodies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain all necessary permits and licenses that may be required to carry out exploration, development, and mining operations on its properties.

 

The Company is awaiting mineral concession renewals at its Cerro Quema Project. There is no assurance that we will receive necessary approvals or extensions, or receive them within a reasonable period of time. Failure to receive the permits or extensions would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations. Additional details are provided in the Cerro Quema Project section of this document.

 

The timing of our ability to construct a mine at Camino Rojo is subject to, and may be affected by, timely review and approval by the Mexican environmental and permitting authorities.

 

Foreign Country and Political Risk

 

The Company’s principal mineral properties are located in Mexico and Panama. The Company is subject to certain risks, including currency fluctuations, possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mineral titles or other mineral rights, opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations, and mineral exploration and mining activities may be affected in varying degrees by political stability and government regulations relating to the mining industry. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its business. Exploration and development may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on future exploitation and production, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange controls, income taxes, royalties on production, expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine and/or site safety.

 

Operating in developing economies such as Mexico and Panama has certain risks, including changes to, or invalidation of, government mining regulations; expropriation or revocation of land or property rights; changes in foreign ownership rights; changes in foreign taxation rates; security issues; corruption; uncertain political climate; narco-terrorist actions or activities; and lack of a stable economic climate.

 

We do not carry political risk insurance.

 

Dependence on Exploration-Stage Properties

 

The Company’s current efforts are focused primarily on exploration stage properties. The Camino Rojo and the Cerro Quema Projects may not develop into commercially viable ore bodies, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s potential mineral resource production, profitability, financial performance, and results of operations.

 

Estimates of Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves and Production Risks

 

The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates included in this MD&A are estimates based on a number of assumptions, including those stated herein, and any adverse change to those assumptions could require the Company to lower its mineral resource estimate. Until a deposit is actually mined and processed, the quantity and grades of mineral resources must be considered as estimates only. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. In addition, the quantity and/or economic viability of mineral resources may vary depending on, among other things, metal prices, grades, production costs, stripping ratios, recovery rates, permit regulations and other legal requirements, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions. Any material change in the quantity of mineral resources or grade may affect the economic viability of the Company’s properties. No assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of minerals will in fact be realized or that an identified mineral resource will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) deposit that can be legally and economically exploited. There can also be no assurance that any discoveries of new mineral reserves will be made. Any material reductions in estimates of mineral resources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Camino Rojo Gold Project mineral resource estimate assumes that the Company can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Company

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by another mining company (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study dated June 25, 2019, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The Feasibility Study was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the Feasibility Study.

 

Mineral resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions

 

The estimation of mineral resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

In particular, the estimation of mineral resources for the Camino Rojo Gold Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the mineral resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached.

 

Although all mineralization included in the Company’s mineral resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the mineral resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in mineral resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Mining Industry

 

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the current exploration programs planned by the Company will result in a profitable commercial mining operation.

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on many factors, some of which are the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as metal prices which are highly cyclical and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

 

Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk. The Company’s operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration and development of ore, including unusual and unexpected geology formations, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. The Company’s mineral exploration activities are directed towards the search, evaluation, and development of mineral deposits. There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Company as described herein will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of ore. There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the discovery and acquisition of properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company will compete with other interests, many of which with greater financial resources, for the opportunity to participate in promising projects. Significant capital investment is required to achieve commercial production from successful exploration efforts.

 

Government Regulation

 

The exploration activities of the Company are subject to various federal, provincial, and local laws governing prospecting, development, taxes, labour standards, toxic substances, and other matters. Exploration activities are also subject to various federal, provincial, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, and land reclamation. These laws also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage, and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Although the Company’s exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations governing operations and exploration activities, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations, amendments to current laws and regulations or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Company’s activities.

 

Title Matters

 

Although the Company has diligently investigated title to all mineral concessions (either granted or under re-application) and, to the best of its knowledge (except as otherwise disclosed herein), titles to all its properties are in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to any of the Company’s mineral properties and any of the Company’s properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected encumbrances or defects or governmental actions.

 

Land Title

 

The Company has investigated ownership of all surface rights in which it has an interest, and, to the best of its knowledge, its ownership rights are in good standing. However, all surface rights may be subject to prior claims or agreement transfers, and rights of ownership may be affected by undetected defects. While to the best of the Company's knowledge, titles to all surface rights are in good standing; however, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to the surface rights in which the Company has an interest. The properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and titles may be affected by undetected defects.

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Environmental Risks and Hazards

 

All phases of the Company’s mineral exploration operations are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors, and employees. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulations, laws and permits, if any, will not adversely affect the Company’s operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which the Company holds interests which are unknown to the Company at present, which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties. The Company may become liable for such environmental hazards caused by previous owners and operators of the properties even where it has attempted to contractually limit its liability.

 

Government approvals and permits are currently, and may in the future be, required in connection with the Company’s operations. To the extent such approvals are required and not obtained; the Company may be curtailed or prohibited from proceeding with planned exploration or development of mineral properties.

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

 

Commodity Prices

 

The profitability of mining operations is significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold and other minerals. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of these minerals and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in metal prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The price of gold and other minerals has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future serious price declines could cause commercial production to be impracticable.

 

Uninsured Risks

 

The Company carries insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers adequate. Risks not insured against include environmental pollution or other hazards against which such corporations cannot insure or against which they may elect not to insure.

 

Compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws

 

Orla is subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (1999). In general, these laws prohibit a company and its employees and intermediaries from bribing or making other prohibited payments to foreign officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. The Company’s primary operations are located in jurisdictions which have been perceived as having fairly high levels of corruption. Orla cannot predict the nature, scope, or effect of future anti- corruption regulatory requirements to which the Company’s operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

 

Failure to comply with the applicable legislation and other similar foreign laws could expose the Company and/or its senior management to civil and/or criminal penalties, other sanctions and remedial measures, legal expenses and reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the applicable anti-corruption legislation by Canadian or foreign authorities could also have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

As a consequence of these legal and regulatory requirements, the Company has instituted policies regarding business ethics, which have been designed to ensure that Orla and its employees comply with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that such efforts have been and will be completely effective in ensuring the Company’s compliance, and the compliance of its employees, consultants, contractors and other agents, with all applicable anticorruption laws and regulations.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

Certain directors of the Company also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in natural resource exploration and development. Consequently, there exists the possibility for such directors to be in a position of conflict. Any decision made by such directors involving the Company will be made in accordance with their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with the Company and such other companies. In addition, such directors will declare, and refrain from voting on, any matter in which such directors may have a conflict of interest.

 

Threat of Infectious Diseases or Outbreaks of Viruses

 

Global markets have been adversely impacted by emerging infectious diseases and/or the threat of outbreaks of viruses, other contagions, or epidemic diseases, including the novel coronavirus COVID-19, and many industries, including the mining industry have been impacted. This outbreak has led to a widespread crisis that is adversely affecting the economies and financial markets of many countries. If increased levels of volatility continue or in the event of a rapid destabilization of global economic conditions, there may be an adverse effect on commodity prices, demand for metals, availability of equity or credit, investor confidence, and general financial market liquidity, all of which may adversely affect the Company’s business and the market price of the Company’s securities.

 

In addition, there may not be an adequate response to emerging infectious diseases. There are potentially significant economic and social impacts, including labour shortages and shutdowns, delays and disruption in supply chains, social unrest, government or regulatory actions or inactions, including permanent changes in taxation or policies, decreased demand or the inability to sell and deliver concentrates and resulting commodities, declines in the price of commodities, delays in permitting or approvals, governmental disruptions or other unknown but potentially significant impacts.

 

At this time, we cannot accurately predict what impacts there will be or what effects these conditions will have on its business, including due to uncertainties relating to the ultimate geographic spread, the duration of the outbreak, and the length of restrictions or responses that have been or may be imposed by the governments. Any outbreak or threat of an outbreak of a contagious or epidemic disease could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its ability to finance, its business and financial results and the market price of its securities.

 

XIV.            FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This MD&A contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding (i) planned exploration and development programs and expenditures; (ii) the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (iii) expectations on the potential renewal of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema project; (iv) proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema project and the Camino Rojo project; (v) the potential for the discovery of additional mineral resources; (vi) Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licenses, mine permits, required agreements with third parties and regulatory approvals, including but not limited to, the receipt of the Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (“ESIA”) permit related to the Cerro Quema project and other necessary permitting required to implement expected future exploration plans; (vii) community and ejido relations; (viii) requirements for additional land; (ix) availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; (x) results of feasibility studies, including but not limited to mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plans and operations, internal rates of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present values, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; (xi) upside opportunities such as pit wall angles, land agreements, and the development of the sulphide mineral resource, and exploration potential; (xii) the timing and costs for production decisions; (xiii) financing timelines and requirements, including the timing and the amount to be secured relating to the Camino Rojo project loan; (xiv) the Camino Rojo project loan, including meeting all the conditions precedent relating to tranches 2 and 3 of the project loan; (xv) timing for start of engineering work, construction, and receipt of permits; (xvi) changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; (xvii) currency and interest rate fluctuations; (xviii) timing for first gold production; and (xix) the Company's objectives and strategies.

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, (i) the future price of gold; (ii) anticipated costs and the Company’s ability to fund its programs; (iii) the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities; (iv) the Company’s ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements; (v) the timing and results of drilling programs; (vi) the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Company’s mineral properties; (vii) the obtaining of an agreement with the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein) to develop the entire Camino Rojo Gold Project mineral resource estimate; (viii) the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects; (ix) the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, (x) assumptions regarding the ability to meet the conditions precedent regarding drawdown on the Camino Rojo project loan; (xi) the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; (xii) that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; (xiii) that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; (xiv) that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; (xv) that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties; (xvi) the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner; and (xvii) the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements include, among others: (i) failing to meet certain conditions precedent to draw the remaining portion of the Camino Rojo project loan; (ii) risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, including changes in economic parameters; (iii) risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; (iv) failure to obtain required regulatory and stock exchange approvals with respect to any Offering; (v) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (vi) delays in or failure to obtain an agreement with the Adjacent Owner with respect to the Camino Rojo Gold Project; (vii) health, safety and environmental risks; (viii) success of exploration, development and operations activities; (ix) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (x) delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (xi) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (xii) uncertainty in estimates of production, capital and operation costs and potential for production and cost overruns; (xiii) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (xiv) the fluctuating price of gold; (xv) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xvi) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; (xvii) competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of mineral reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; and (xviii) the Company’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions.

 

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020        United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risks and Uncertainties” in this MD&A for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this MD&A and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. You are urged to read the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which you can view online under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com

 

Page 24

 

Exhibit 99.04

 

FORM 52-109F2 

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS 

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Jason Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended September 30, 2020.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on July 1, 2020 and ended on September 30, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date: November 13, 2020

 

/s/ Jason Simpson  

Jason Simpson

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.05

 

FORM 52-109F2 

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS 

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended September 30, 2020.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on July 1, 2020 and ended on September 30, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date: November 13, 2020

 

/s/ Etienne Morin  

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.06

  

NEWS RELEASE  

 

ORLA MINING COMPLETES SECOND TRANCHE DRAWDOWN OF US$50 MILLION ON PROJECT FINANCE FACILITY

 

VANCOUVER, BC – November 2, 2020 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the "Company") is pleased to announce that the Company has completed the second tranche drawdown of US$50 million on its previously announced Project Finance Facility (“Credit Facility”). The funds will be used towards the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (“Camino Rojo”) located in Zacatecas State, Mexico.

 

All conditions precedent for the second drawdown have been satisfied, including the receipt of key mine permits at Camino Rojo. To date, US$75 million of the US$125 million Credit Facility has been drawn. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the third and final tranche of US$50 million must be drawn within six months of the second tranche and remains subject to meeting certain conditions precedent. The term of the Credit Facility is five years and bears interest at 8.8% per annum. For additional details on the Credit Facility, please refer to the Company’s News Releases dated October 21, 2019 and December 18, 2019.

 

Orla has the two principal permits necessary and construction activities at Camino Rojo are underway. At the end of the third quarter of 2020, detailed engineering was 87% complete and commitments for equipment and contracts totalled US$67 million. Current construction activities include mobilization of the earthworks contractor, installation of the construction camp and offices, and site fence erection. A power line to site has been approved by the federal electricity commission (“CFE”) and construction is currently underway ahead of schedule, which is anticipated to result in cost savings during the first year of operation. Process plant equipment, including crusher and conveyors, is expected to start arriving on site in November 2020.

 

The next phase of construction will be the earthworks, which can commence upon the placement of a required environmental bond. As a condition of the Company’s Environmental Impact Statement (“Manifestos de Impacto Ambiental” or “MIA”), Orla submitted a Technical Economic Study on August 27, 2020 to the Mexican Federal Environmental Department ("SEMARNAT"). Upon acceptance of the study by SEMARNAT, the environmental bond will be placed.

 

Orla continues to maintain robust organization-wide COVID-19 prevention protocols to support the health of employees and local communities. To date, the Company has reported zero cases of COVID-19. Orla is closely monitoring the potential impacts from the pandemic on areas including equipment delivery and logistics, construction costs and schedule, as well as community and government relations.

 

1

 

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 160,000 hectares. The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

  

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the use of funds, the timing of meeting certain conditions with respect to the Credit Facility and the approval of the MIA, the timing of commencement of construction activities and equipment delivery, the results of exploration and planned exploration programs, anticipated cost savings, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources and the Company’s objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions that all conditions of the Credit Facility and the MIA will be met, the Company’s activities will be in accordance with the Company’s public statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required approvals will be obtained and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources; and risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses, as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company's most recently filed management's discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 23, 2020, available on www.sedar.com. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson 

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Andrew Bradbury 

Director, Investor Relations

 

www.orlamining.com
info@orlamining.com

 

2

 

 

Exhibit 99.07

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

ORLA MINING APPOINTS SYLVAIN GUERARD AS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, EXPLORATION

 

VANCOUVER, BC – August 24, 2020 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the "Company") is pleased to announce that Sylvain Guerard has been appointed as Senior Vice President, Exploration, effective August 24, 2020.

 

“We are excited to welcome Sylvain to the Orla team. The addition of this capable individual reinforces our commitment to focus on exploration within our 178,000 hectares of concessions. These concessions are situated along the prolific San Tiburcio fault system in Zacatecas, Mexico, and within a geologically prospective area for copper and gold in southwestern Panama. We expect to continue to make more discoveries, expand our resource base, and advance our project pipeline to create value”, stated Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Orla.

 

Mr. Guerard brings to Orla 30 years of global mining industry experience having worked in various roles at companies including Barrick Gold, Kinross Gold, and Inmet Mining. He has led teams in the successful discovery of mineral deposits and resource expansions. Mr. Guerard was recently Senior Vice-President, Exploration at McEwen Mining where he oversaw exploration activities across the Americas. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.), Geology, from the University of Montreal.

 

Orla continues to advance its project pipeline in Mexico and Panama through various exploration programs on its prospective land packages.

 

In Mexico, where Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, the Company has commenced a 6,000-metre regional reverse circulation (RC) drilling program to test geophysical induced polarization (IP) anomalies in three areas. Orla plans an additional 3,000 metres of diamond drilling to follow-up on any significant mineralization encountered. Mechanical trenching is being undertaken in an area where hydrothermal alteration was found in rock outcrops, with nine of ten trenches completed. A 5,000-metre diamond drilling program is also planned in the fourth quarter of 2020 to support the next stage of metallurgical testing on the 7.3 million ounces of gold in sulphide material (Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource of 258.8 Mt at 0.88 g/t Au)i occurring below the planned oxide open pit.

 

In Panama, Orla expects to resume exploration drilling in the coming weeks. The program is intended to test targets for additional gold oxide mineralization proximal to the existing mineral reserves, which could potentially add to the projected mine life at Cerro Quema. The program also plans to test targets for copper-gold sulphide material similar to the Caballito discovery made in 2017. Results of this program will be included in the maiden copper-gold mineral resource estimate for Caballito. Work is underway to update the 2014 pre-feasibility study for the Cerro Quema Oxide Project to enable a construction decision in 2021.

 

1

 

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 160,000 hectares. The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the timing of meeting certain conditions with respect to the approval of the MIA, the timing of commencement of construction activities, the results of exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources and the Company’s objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions that all conditions of the MIA will be met, the Company’s activities will be in accordance with the Company’s public statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required approvals will be obtained and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources; and risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson
President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Andrew Bradbury

Director, Investor Relations

 

www.orlamining.com
info@orlamining.com

 

 

i . Please refer to “Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report”, dated effective June 25, 2019.

 

2

 

 

Exhibit 99.08

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

ORLA MINING RECEIVES ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE CAMINO ROJO OXIDE GOLD PROJECT

 

VANCOUVER, BC – August 13, 2020 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the "Company") is pleased to announce that the Mexican Federal Environmental Department ("SEMARNAT") has granted approval of the Company’s Environmental Impact Statement (“Manifestos de Impacto Ambiental” or “MIA”) required for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (“Camino Rojo”) located in Zacatecas State, Mexico. The approval of the MIA is conditional upon Orla meeting certain customary conditions and standard requirements which the Company intends to complete in the coming weeks. Orla now has the two principal permits necessary for commencement of construction activities at Camino Rojo. The receipt of the MIA also satisfies one of the key conditions precedent to the drawdown of the remaining US$100 million available on the previously announced US$125 million project finance facility (“Credit Facility”).

 

“The approved MIA is the next step to develop the Camino Rojo Oxide Project. We can now begin construction and maintain our schedule to produce our first gold in 2021”, stated Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Orla. “We would like to thank and recognize everyone who has worked on the permitting process and supported us to get to this point. We look forward to continuing to work closely with our various stakeholders, including the local communities around the Camino Rojo Project”.

 

Detailed engineering is now over 73% complete and in anticipation of the receipt of the final permit, Orla has pre-ordered and committed to over US$50 million for long-lead time items. Major contracts for earth moving and civil work are well advanced and are expected to be finalized in the coming weeks. Under Mexico’s current COVID-19 legislation, mining and construction are now permitted economic activities and the Camino Rojo site has been ramping up in strict compliance with the Mexican Health Authority and Company requirements. Orla has implemented a strict COVID-19 protocol, including rigorous testing programs as it begins a controlled mobilization to site for construction. Exploration work programs have already begun and are testing regional targets in the large area of prospective geology that surrounds the known deposit.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 160,000 hectares. The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

1

 

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the timing of meeting certain conditions with respect to the approval of the MIA, the timing of commencement of construction activities, the results of exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources and the Company’s objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions that all conditions of the MIA will be met, the Company’s activities will be in accordance with the Company’s public statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required approvals will be obtained and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources; and risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson
President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Andrew Bradbury

Director, Investor Relations

 

www.orlamining.com
info@orlamining.com

 

2

 

 

Exhibit 99.09

 

 

Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

  

Presented in United States dollars

 

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Condensed Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars)

 

    June 30     December 31     January 1  
As at   2020     2019     2019  
          (restated,
notes 3 and 22)
    (restated,
notes 3 and 22)
 
ASSETS                  
Current assets                  
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 54,665     $ 23,106     $ 12,234  
Accounts receivable     71       94       282  
Prepaid expenses     128       53       151  
      54,864       23,253       12,667  
Restricted funds     528       509       150  
VAT recoverable (note 7)     1,895       1,340       622  
Deposits on long term assets (note 5(a)(i))     9,801              
Construction in progress (note 5(a)(i))     1,453              
Equipment (note 6)     343       284       252  
Exploration and evaluation assets (note 5(d))     118,113       125,643       124,099  
TOTAL ASSETS   $ 186,997     $ 151,029     $ 137,790  
                         
LIABILITIES                        
Current liabilities                        
Trade and other payables (note 8)   $ 843     $ 802     $ 1,278  
Accrued liabilities     3,060       1,578       1,405  
      3,903       2,380       2,683  
Lease obligations     100       44        
Camino Rojo project loan (note 9)     13,630       12,961        
Newmont loan (note 10)     8,007       9,647       4,475  
Accrued liabilities – long term     386       261        
Site closure provisions (note 11)     558       575       626  
TOTAL LIABILITIES     26,584       25,868       7,784  
                         
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                        
Share capital (note 13)     214,958       159,230       153,852  
Reserves     30,349       30,061       19,931  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     (9,393 )     (1,027 )     (3,393 )
Accumulated deficit     (75,501 )     (63,103 )     (40,384 )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY     160,413       125,161       130,006  
                         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 186,997     $ 151,029     $ 137,790  

 

Events after the reporting period (notes 13(b), 14(a), 14(d), and 21)

 

Authorized by the Board of Directors on August 10, 2020, for issuance.

 

/s/ Elizabeth McGregor   /s/ Jason Simpson
Elizabeth McGregor, Director   Jason Simpson, Director

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars, except per-share amounts)

 

    Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
    2020     2019
(restated note 3)
    2020     2019
(restated note 3)
 
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENSES (note 5)                                
Assays and analysis   $ 14     $ 39     $ 29     $ 122  
Drilling           215             729  
Geological     205       334       420       971  
Engineering     252       618       530       1,302  
Environmental     16       173       91       317  
Community and government     71       165       2,521       350  
Land and water use, claims and concessions     (68 )     6       3,160       2,312  
Project management           60             93  
Project review           46       6       88  
Site activities     113       302       461       886  
Site administration     167       657       913       1,087  
Recognition of site closure provisions                 15        
      770       2,615       8,146       8,257  
                                 
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES                                
Office and administrative     194       83       379       284  
Professional fees     230       110       406       204  
Regulatory     66       34       148       65  
Salaries and benefits     527       450       791       833  
      1,017       677       1,724       1,386  
                                 
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)                                
Depreciation (note 6)     382       25       625       47  
Share based payments (note 14)     612       673       1,384       1,615  
Interest income and finance costs (note 12)     648       35       1,260       256  
Foreign exchange loss (gain)     (1,220 )     7       (741 )     20  
      422       740       2,528       1,938  
                                 
LOSS FOR THE PERIOD   $ 2,209     $ 4,032     $ 12,398     $ 11,581  
                                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME)                                
Items that may in future periods be reclassified to profit or loss:                                
Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations     1,205       (338 )     8,366       (1,138 )
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS   $ 3,414     $ 3,694     $ 20,764     $ 10,443  
                                 
                                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions)     224.4       179.5       205.9       179.5  
                                 
Loss per share - basic and diluted   $ 0.01     $ 0.02     $ 0.06     $ 0.06  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars)

 

    Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
    2020     2019     2020     2019  
Cash flows provided by (used in):         (restated note 3)           (restated note 3)  
OPERATING ACTIVITIES                                
Loss for the period   $ (2,209 )   $ (4,032 )   $ (12,398 )   $ (11,581 )
Adjustments for items not affecting cash:                                
Depreciation     202       25       445       47  
Share based compensation     612       673       1,384       1,615  
Changes in site closure provisions charged to exploration expense                 15        
Newmont loan proceeds received in excess of fair value (note 10)                       (715 )
Amortization of project loan transaction costs (note 9)     167             187        
Accretion of the Newmont loan (note 10)     (8 )     56       57       324  
Interest expense on leases     45             45        
Lease payments     (456 )           (456 )      
Exploration expenses paid via issuance of common shares           48             48  
Changes in non-cash working capital:                                
Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses     (91 )     168       (65 )     315  
Trade and other payables     26       199       30       (589 )
Accrued liabilities     57       (498 )     1,888       (498 )
Cash used in operating activities     (1,655 )     (3,361 )     (8,868 )     (11,034 )
                                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES                                
Proceeds on issuance of common shares     54,959             54,959        
Proceeds – warrants exercised     1,547       261       1,547       261  
Proceeds – stock options exercised     128             219        
Share issuance costs     (2,095 )     (12 )     (2,095 )     (12 )
Payment of principal portion of lease liabilities           (10 )           (10 )
Advances received on the Newmont loan                       2,674  
Cash provided by financing activities     54,539       239       54,630       2,913  
                                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES                                
Purchase of equipment     39       (3 )     (8 )     (3 )
Construction in progress     (1,014 )     (1 )     (1,551 )     (1 )
Deposits on long term assets     (10,467 )           (10,467 )      
Restricted cash funded     (17 )     (57 )     (21 )     (303 )
Value added taxes paid, not immediately recoverable     (674 )     (138 )     (843 )     (293 )
Cash used in investing activities     (12,133 )     (199 )     (12,890 )     (600 )
                                 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash     (1,508 )     (71 )     (1,313 )     328  
                                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash     39,243       (3,392 )     31,559       (8,393 )
Cash, beginning of period     15,422       7,233       23,106       12,234  
CASH, END OF PERIOD   $ 54,665     $ 3,841     $ 54,665     $ 3,841  
                                 
Cash consist of:                                
Bank current accounts and cash on hand   $ 54,665     $ 3,841     $ 54,665     $ 3,841  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars)

 

    Common shares     Reserves                    
    Number of
shares
(thousands)
    Amount    

Share based
payments

reserve

   

Warrants

reserve

    Total     Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income
   

Retained

earnings

(deficit)

    Total  
Balance at January 1, 2019 (restated, note 3)     179,315     $ 153,852     $ 6,867     $ 13,064     $ 19,931     $ (3,393 )   $ (40,384 )   $ 130,006  
Shares issued for property payments     59       48                                     48  
Warrants exercised     563       400             (134 )     (134 )                 266  
Share issuance costs           (12 )                                   (12 )
RSUs redeemed     196       162       (162 )           (162 )                  
Share based payments                 1,615             1,615                   1,615  
Loss for the period                                         (11,581 )     (11,581 )
Other comprehensive loss                                   1,138             1,138  
Balance at June 30, 2019     180,133     $ 154,450     $ 8,320     $ 12,930     $ 21,250     $ (2,255 )   $ (51,965 )   $ 121,480  
                                                                 
Balance at January 1, 2020     187,102     $ 159,230     $ 8,159     $ 21,902     $ 30,061     $ (1,027 )   $ (63,103 )   $ 125,161  
Shares issued pursuant to a financing     36,600       54,959                                     54,959  
Share issuance costs           (2,095 )                                   (2,095 )
Warrants exercised     1,108       1,818             (271 )     (271 )                 1,547  
Options exercised     360       399       (178 )           (178 )                 221  
RSUs redeemed     359       289       (289 )           (289 )                  
Bonus shares issued (note 14(d))     500       358       (358 )           (358 )                  
Share based payments                 1,384             1,384                   1,384  
Loss for the period                                         (12,398 )     (12,398 )
Other comprehensive loss                                   (8,366 )           (8,366 )
Balance at June 30, 2020     226,029     $ 214,958     $ 8,718     $ 21,631     $ 30,349     $ (9,393 )   $ (75,501 )   $ 160,413  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

 

Orla Mining Ltd. was incorporated in Alberta in 2007 and was continued into British Columbia in 2010 and subsequently into Ontario under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) in 2014. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. The registered office of the Company is located at Suite 202, 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada.

 

The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties, and holds the Camino Rojo gold and silver project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama.

 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. Different bases of measurement may be appropriate if the Company is not expected to continue operations for the foreseeable future. As at June 30, 2020, the Company had not advanced any of its properties to commercial production and was not able to fund day-to-day activities through operating activities. During the reporting period, the Company completed a C$75 million ($55 million) equity financing. The Company has received $25 million of a $125 million project loan facility in respect of the Camino Rojo project.

 

The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon successful results from our mineral exploration and development activities and our ability to attain profitable operations and generate cash or raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations and strategic objectives. We expect to fund operating costs of the Company over the next twelve months with cash on hand and with further loan advances.

 

During the reporting period, there was a global outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”), which has had an impact on businesses through the restrictions put in place by the governments in the various jurisdictions where the Company conducts its activities. In common with all businesses in the jurisdictions in which we operate, our activities are restricted by government orders related to, among others, travel, business operations, and stay-at-home orders. As of the date of these financial statements, it is not possible to determine the extent of the impact that this global health emergency will have on the Company’s activities in the future as the Company cannot predict the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, and possible government, societal, and individual responses to the situation. We continue to monitor our activities, in particular with regard to the safety of our personnel and the communities where we conduct our activities.

 

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION

 

These condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 «Interim Financial Reporting» and do not include all the information required for full annual financial statements.

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

These condensed interim consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.

 

On August 10, 2020, the Board of Directors approved these consolidated financial statements for issuance.

 

3. CHANGE OF PRESENTATION CURRENCY

 

As a result of the continued advancement of the Camino Rojo Project, the Company changed its presentation currency from Canadian dollars to United States dollars effective January 1, 2020. The change in the financial statement presentation currency is an accounting policy change and has been accounted for retrospectively. The balance sheets for each period presented have been translated from the related subsidiary’s functional currency to the new US dollar presentation currency at the rate of exchange prevailing at the respective balance sheet date except for equity items, which have been translated at accumulated historical rates from the related subsidiary’s date of incorporation. The statements of income and comprehensive income were translated at the average exchange rates for the reporting period, or at the exchange rate prevailing at the date of transactions. Exchange differences arising in 2018 on translation from the related subsidiary’s functional currency to the United States dollar presentation currency have been recognized in other comprehensive income and accumulated as a separate component of equity.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

In prior reporting periods, the translation of the Company’s subsidiaries that had a United States dollar or Mexican peso functional currency into the Company’s presentation currency of the Canadian dollar gave rise to a translation adjustment which was recorded as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), a separate component of shareholders’ equity. With the retrospective application of the change in presentation currency from the Canadian dollar to the US dollar, the AOCI related to the translation of US dollar functional currency subsidiaries was eliminated. However, with the retrospective application of the change in presentation currency to the US dollar, the Company’s corporate office, which has a Canadian dollar functional currency, resulted in an AOCI balance. The AOCI balance generated by the Mexican peso entities has been adjusted since it now reflects the translation into the new US dollar presentation currency.

 

(a) Adjustment to previously reported financial information due to change in presentation currency

 

For comparative purposes, the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2019 include adjustments to reflect the change in the presentation currency to the US dollar, which is a change in accounting policy. The exchange rates used to translate the amounts previously reported into US dollars at December 31, 2019 were 1.2988 CAD/USD and 18.87 MXN/USD, and at January 1, 2019 were 1.3642 CAD/USD and 19.65 MXN/USD. Refer to note 22(a) for the effects of the translation.

 

For comparative purposes, the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 includes adjustments to reflect the change in the presentation currency to the US dollar, which is a change in accounting policy. The exchange rates used to translate the amounts previously reported into US dollars for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 were 1.3338 CAD/USD and 19.16 MXN/USD, which were the average exchange rates for the period. Refer to note 22(b) for the effects of the translation.

 

(b) Functional currency

 

The functional currencies of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned, remained unchanged and were as follows for periods presented.

 

Orla Mining Ltd. Canadian dollars
Minerometalúrgica San Miguel S de RL de CV Mexican pesos
Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV Mexican pesos
Minera Cerro Quema SA United States dollars
Monitor Gold Corporation United States dollars

 

4. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

We applied the same accounting policies in these condensed interim consolidated financial statements as those applied in the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

In preparing these condensed interim consolidated financial statements, the significant judgements we made in applying the Company’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those that applied to the annual consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

You should read these condensed interim consolidated financial statements in conjunction with the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

5. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION

 

(a) Camino Rojo Project

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine. In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project, a gold and silver oxide heap leach project located in Zacatecas State, Mexico, from Goldcorp Inc. (now called Newmont Corporation).

 

The Company and Newmont also entered into an option agreement regarding the potential development of sulphide operations at Camino Rojo. Pursuant to the option agreement, Newmont will, subject to the applicable sulphide project meeting certain thresholds, have an option to acquire a 60% or 70% interest in the applicable sulphide project. The Royalty excludes revenue on the sale of metals produced from a sulphide project where Newmont has exercised its Sulphide Option. We maintain a right of first refusal on the sale if Newmont elects to sell the Royalty, in whole or in part.

 

We have applied for and expect to receive permits for the construction of a mine at Camino Rojo. In anticipation of such approvals, we have already commenced activities such as construction engineering and design work which are not necessarily of an exploration and evaluation nature. Consequently we are presenting these costs as construction in progress.

 

(i) Construction in progress

 

    Total  
Construction in progress at historical rates        
At December 31, 2019   $  
Additions     1,551  
At June 30, 2020   $ 1,551  
         
Accumulated foreign exchange on translation        
At December 31, 2019      
Due to changes in exchange rates     (98 )
At June 30, 2020   $ (98 )
         
Construction in progress        
At December 31, 2019   $  
At June 30, 2020   $ 1,453  
         

The figures in the above totals do not include down payments which we have made on key components and construction items related to the Camino Rojo project. At June 30, 2020, down payments and advances totaled $9,801,000 (December 31, 2019 – $nil).

 

(b) Cerro Quema Project

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, Panama. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open pit mine with process by heap leaching.

 

In December 2016, we acquired 100% of the Cerro Quema Project by acquiring Pershimco Resources Inc. through the issuance of a combination of Orla common shares and warrants, and the assumption of Pershimco’s long term debt, which we subsequently paid off. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the current mineral resource areas, proposed mine development areas, and priority drill target areas.

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

The original 20-year terms for these concessions expired in February and March of 2017. The Company has applied for the prescribed ten year extension to these concessions as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. In March 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications had been received and that exploration work could continue while the Company awaits renewal of the concessions. As of the date of these financial statements, final concession renewals have not been received; however, we continue to receive ongoing drilling, water use, environmental and other permits, and have paid concession taxes, in the normal course.

 

(c) Monitor Gold Project

 

The Monitor Gold Project consists of three separate option agreements consisting of 422 claims covering 3,416 hectares in Nye County, Nevada, USA.

 

In 2019, these consisted of $50,000 in share issuances, a $20,000 in advance royalty payments, and $30,000 in work commitments, all of which requirements were met by the Company. For 2020, these consist of $40,000 in advance royalty payments, and $75,000 in work commitments, both of which requirements for 2020 have been met. To maintain the options, minimum payments and work commitments are required for each year to 2038.

 

(d) Exploration and evaluation assets

 

    Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Total  
Acquisition costs at historical rates                                
At December 31, 2019   $ 42,615     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 125,358  
Additions                        
At June 30, 2020   $ 42,615     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 125,358  
                                 
Accumulated foreign exchange on translation                                
At December 31, 2019     285                   285  
Due to changes in exchange rates     (7,530 )                 (7,530 )
At June 30, 2020   $ (7,245 )   $     $     $ (7,245 )
                                 
Acquisition costs                                
At December 31, 2019   $ 42,900     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 125,643  
At June 30, 2020   $ 35,370     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 118,113  

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

(e) Exploration and evaluation expense

 

Three months ended June 30, 2020   Camino Rojo     Cerro Quema     Monitor Gold     Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 14     $     $     $     $ 14  
Geological     168       37                   205  
Engineering     230       22                   252  
Environmental     (4 )     20                   16  
Community and government     (29 )     100                   71  
Land, water use, and claims     (68 )                       (68 )
Site activities     19       94                   113  
Site administration     76       91                   167  
    $ 406     $ 364     $     $     $ 770  

 

Six months ended June 30, 2020   Camino Rojo     Cerro Quema     Monitor Gold     Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 28     $     $ 1     $     $ 29  
Geological     352       68                   420  
Engineering     474       56                   530  
Environmental     54       37                   91  
Community and government     2,341       180                   2,521  
Land, water use, and claims     3,120             40             3,160  
Project review                       6       6  
Site activities     167       294                   461  
Site administration     550       363                   913  
Recognition of site closure provisions     15                         15  
    $ 7,101     $ 998     $ 41     $ 6     $ 8,146  

 

Three months ended June 30, 2019   Camino Rojo     Cerro Quema     Monitor Gold     Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 39     $     $     $     $ 39  
Drilling     215                         215  
Geological     226       163       22       (77 )     334  
Engineering     618                         618  
Environmental     173                         173  
Community and government     120       45                   165  
Land, water use, and claims     6       1       (1 )           6  
Project management     60                         60  
Project review                       46       46  
Site activities     198       104                   302  
Site administration     144       512       1             657  
    $ 1,799     $ 825     $ 22     $ (31 )   $ 2,615  

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Six months ended June 30, 2019   Camino Rojo     Cerro Quema     Monitor Gold     Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 99     $ 23     $     $     $ 122  
Drilling     729                         729  
Geological     504       441       26             971  
Engineering     1,302                         1,302  
Environmental     317                         317  
Community and government     209       141                   350  
Land, water use, and claims     2,234       2       76             2,312  
Project management     93                         93  
Project review                       88       88  
Site activities     430       456                   886  
Site administration     307       778       2             1,087  
    $ 6,224     $ 1,841     $ 104     $ 88     $ 8,257  

 

6. EQUIPMENT

 

    Cost     Accumulated depreciation     Net book value  
   

Begin of

year

   

Changes

during

the

period

    Effect of FX    

End of

period

   

Begin of

year

   

Changes

during

the

period

   

Effect of

FX

   

End of

period

   

Begin of

year

   

End of

period

 
Machinery and equipment   $ 324     $ 4     $ (19 )   $ 309     $ 205     $ 16     $ (3 )   $ 218     $ 119     $ 91  
Office equipment     36             (4 )     32       15       1       (2 )     14       21       18  
Computers and software     150       4       (10 )     144       96       13       (4 )     105       54       39  
Vehicles     21                   21       2                   2       19       19  
Land – leases           3             3             2             2             1  
Buildings – leases     89       229       (19 )     299       18       115       (2 )     131       71       168  
Office equipment – leases           31       (2 )     29             24       (2 )     22       71       7  
Road vehicles – leases           274       (17 )     257             274       (17 )     257       71        
Total   $ 620     $ 545     $ (71 )   $ 1,094     $ 336     $ 445     $ (30 )   $ 751     $ 284     $ 343  
                                                                                 
7. VALUE ADDED TAXES (“VAT”) RECOVERABLE

 

Our Mexican entities pay value-added taxes (called “IVA” in Mexico) on certain goods and services we purchase.

 

We also paid approximately 74 million Mexican pesos (approximately $3,860,000) of IVA on the initial acquisition of the Camino Rojo project, which is classified within exploration and evaluation assets as part of acquisition cost (note 5(a) and 5(d)).

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

8. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

 

    June 30,
2020
    December 31,
2019
 
Trade payables   $ 386     $ 492  
Payroll related liabilities     372       208  
Lease obligations – current     85       23  
Interest payable on Camino Rojo project loan           79  
    $ 843     $ 802  

 

9. CAMINO ROJO PROJECT LOAN

 

In December 2019, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) and certain other lenders with respect to a credit debt facility of US$125 million for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (the “Credit Facility”).

 

The Credit Facility provides a total of US$125 million to the Company, available in three tranches. The first tranche of US$25 million was drawn down by the Company on December 18, 2019 upon execution of the definitive loan documentation. Tranches 2 and 3 provide US$50 million each, available for drawdown after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of certain key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo project.

 

The Credit Facility is denominated in United States dollars, and bears interest at 8.80% per annum, payable quarterly commencing March 31, 2020, and is secured by all the assets of the Camino Rojo Project and the fixed assets of the Cerro Quema Project. The principal amount is due upon maturity at December 18, 2024, with no scheduled principal payments prior to maturity. The Company may prepay the loan, in full or in part, at any time during the term without penalty, by using cash flow from operations. The Credit Facility does not impose on the Company any mandatory requirements of hedging, production payments, offtake, streams, or royalties.

 

On December 18, 2019, the Company issued 32.5 million common share purchase warrants, with an exercise price of C$3.00 per warrant and an expiry date of December 18, 2026, to the lenders.

 

    Six months
ended
June 30, 2020
    Year
ended
December 31,
2019
 
Balance, beginning of year   $ 12,961     $  
Amounts drawn down during the period           25,000  
Cash transaction costs           (3,158 )
Warrants issued to the lenders           (8,968 )
Amortization of the transaction costs     187       86  
Foreign exchange     482       1  
Balance, end of period   $ 13,630     $ 12,961  

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

10. NEWMONT LOAN

 

As part of the Company’s acquisition of the Camino Rojo project from Newmont (then, Goldcorp Inc.), Newmont agreed to provide interest-free loans to the Company for all the annual landholding costs on the Camino Rojo project from November 7, 2017 until December 31, 2019. The loans are to be repaid upon declaration of commencement of commercial production of a heap leach operation at the Camino Rojo Project. To the date of these financial statements, 219,446,000 pesos had been advanced by Newmont under this agreement. No further advances in respect of this loan are expected.

 

The original agreement provided that the Company may, at its option, repay any amounts owing to Newmont, prior to maturity, in the form of (a) a lump sum cash payment, (b) the issuance of additional common shares of the Company, or (c) a combination of cash and shares (subject to certain maximum ownership limits). During the quarter ended June 30, 2020, the Company agreed with Newmont that the repayment would be made in cash.

 

Because the loan is non-interest bearing, for accounting purposes at date of each advance, we discount the expected payments using a risk-adjusted discount rate and an estimated repayment date. Amounts received in excess of fair value on the date of the advances were credited to exploration expense.

 

    Mexican pesos
 (thousands)
    Mexican pesos
(thousands)
    US dollars
(thousands)
 
    Undiscounted     Discounted        
At January 1, 2019     121,865       87,917     $ 4,475  
Advances received     97,601       72,897       3,676  
Accretion during the year           21,886       1,104  
Foreign exchange                 392  
At December 31, 2019     219,466       182,700     $ 9,647  
Accretion year to date           1,231       57  
Foreign exchange                 (1,697 )
At June 30, 2020     219,466       183,931     $ 8,007  

 

11. SITE CLOSURE PROVISIONS

 

      Camino Rojo
Project
    Cerro Quema
Project
    Total  
At December 31, 2019     $ 232     $ 343     $ 575  
At June 30, 2020     $ 215     $ 343     $ 558  

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

12. INTEREST INCOME AND FINANCE COSTS

 

    Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
    2020     2019     2020     2019  
Interest on Camino Rojo project loan (note 9)   $ 536     $     $ 1,117     $  
Amortization of Camino Rojo project loan costs (note 9)     167             187        
Accretion on Newmont loan (note 10)     (8 )     56       57       324  
Interest expense on leases     40       1       48       1  
Interest income     (87 )     (22 )     (149 )     (69 )
    $ 648     $ 35     $ 1,260     $ 256  

 

13. SHARE CAPITAL

 

(a) Issued share capital

 

On April 3, 2020, the Company closed an equity financing of 36,600,000 common shares at a price of C$2.05 per common share for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of C$75,030,000 ($54,959,000). After share issuance costs of $2,095,000 net proceeds were $52,864,000.

 

In the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued:

 

· 1,107,500 common shares pursuant to the exercise of warrants (note 13(b)) for proceeds of $1,547,000.

 

· 360,000 common shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options (note 14(a)) for proceeds of $221,000.

 

· 359,000 common shares pursuant to the vesting of RSUs (note 14(b)).

 

· 500,000 common shares pursuant to the vesting of bonus shares (note 14(d)).

 

(b) Warrants

 

The following summarizes information about the number of warrants outstanding during the period.

 

Expiry date   Exercise price     December 31
2019
    Issued     Exercised     June 30
2020
 
February 15, 2021   C$ 2.35       8,790,600             (407,500 )     8,383,100  
July 8, 2021   C$ 0.62       570,000                   570,000  
June 12, 2022   C$ 1.65       5,842,500             (700,000 )     5,142,500  
November 7, 2022   C$ 1.40       3,000,000                   3,000,000  
December 18, 2026   C$ 3.00       32,500,000                   32,500,000  
Total number of warrants             50,703,100             (1,107,500 )     49,595,600  
                                         
Weighted average exercise price           C$ 2.61           C$ 1.91     C$ 2.63  

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, 320,000 warrants were exercised, for gross proceeds to the Company of $239,000.

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

14. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

 

The Company has four different forms of share-based payments for eligible recipients – stock options, restricted share units (“RSUs”), deferred share units (“DSUs”), and bonus shares.

 

Share based payments expense   Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
    2020     2019     2020     2019  
Stock options   $ 398     $ 415     $ 776     $ 1,005  
Restricted share units     138       136       260       174  
Deferred share units                 217       190  
Bonus shares     76       122       131       246  
Share based payments expense   $ 612     $ 673     $ 1,384     $ 1,615  

 

(a) Stock options

 

Stock options outstanding   Number     Weighted average
exercise price
 
As at January 1, 2019     9,124,005     C$ 1.23  
Granted     2,199,322       1.08  
Exercised     (1,358,491 )     1.16  
Expired or cancelled     (47,500 )     1.48  
As at December 31, 2019     9,917,336       1.20  
Granted     1,683,438       2.29  
Exercised     (360,000 )     0.83  
As at June 30, 2020     11,240,774     C$ 1.38  
                 
Vested, December 31, 2019     7,229,622     C$ 1.22  
Vested, June 30, 2020     8,967,638     C$ 1.29  

 

The options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2020 had an aggregate grant date fair value of $1,153,600 (C$1,575,000) which was determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

 

· Expected volatility 47%, expected life 5 years, Canadian dollar risk free interest rate 0.6%, dividends nil.

 

The options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2019 had an aggregate grant date fair value of $737,000 (C$932,000) which was determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

· expected volatility 50%, expected life 5 years, Canadian dollar risk free interest rate 1.5%, dividends nil.

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, 755,789 stock options were exercised, for gross proceeds to the Company of $716,000 and 300,000 stock options were granted, with an aggregate grant date fair value of $359,700.

 

Page 15

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Restricted Share Units

 

    Total     Number vesting in the year  
Number of RSUs outstanding:   number     2020     2021     2022     2023  
Outstanding, December 31, 2019     1,014,972       365,882       365,880       283,210        
Awarded during the period     320,450             106,819       106,816       106,815  
Vested and settled during the period     (359,215 )     (359,215 )                  
Outstanding, June 30, 2020     976,207       6,667       472,699       390,026       106,815  

 

RSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares immediately prior to award.

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, 48,181 RSUs vested and were settled by the issuance of 48,181 common shares.

 

(c) Deferred Share Units

 

DSUs outstanding:   Number  
Outstanding, December 31, 2019     508,780  
Awarded     135,745  
Outstanding, June 30, 2020     644,525  

 

DSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares immediately prior to award.

 

(d) Bonus shares

 

Bonus shares outstanding:   Number  
Outstanding, December 31, 2019     1,500,000  
Vested and issued during the period     500,000  
Outstanding, June 30, 2020     1,000,000  

 

During 2017, the Board of Directors awarded 500,000 common shares to the non-executive Chairman of the Company as bonus shares. The bonus shares are subject to a vesting period from June 19, 2017 to June 18, 2020 (the “Eligibility Period”). If the non-executive Chairman ceases to be the director of the Company before the Eligibility Period ends, the bonus shares will be forfeited. The bonus shares will become issuable (1) after the Eligibility Period on the date that the non-executive Chairman ceases to act as a director of the Company, or (2) upon a change of control of the Company.

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

We estimated the fair value of the bonus shares ($1.31 each) based on the market price of the common shares at the date of the grant. Accordingly, the amount of $655,000 is being recognized on a straight line basis over the Eligibility Period.

 

On November 13, 2018, the Board of Directors awarded 1,000,000 bonus shares to an officer of the Company. The bonus shares vest in four tranches of 250,000 bonus shares each, issuable upon the achievement of certain share price thresholds particular to each tranche. Upon initial recognition we estimated the dates that each of these market condition tranches would vest, such dates ranging from December 2019 to March 2022. Consequently, the award date fair value ($537,000, or $0.537 per bonus share) is being recognized over these four periods.

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2020, two of these tranches vested and the bonus shares were issued.

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, the third and fourth tranches of 250,000 each vested, but no common shares had yet been issued as of the issuance date of these financial statements.

 

15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company’s related parties include:

 

Related party   Nature of the relationship
Key management personnel   Key management personnel are the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and members of the Board of Directors of the Company.

 

(a) Key Management Personnel

 

Compensation to key management personnel was as follows:

 

    Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
    2020     2019     2020     2019  
Short term incentive plans                                
Salaries   $ 596     $ 457     $ 732     $ 631  
Directors’ fees     41       38       84       69  
      637       495       816       700  
Share based payments     489       511       1,119       1,270  
Total   $ 1,126     $ 1,006     $ 1,935     $ 1,970  

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Transactions

 

The Company had no other material transactions with related parties, other than with key management personnel as described above, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, or during the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

(c) Outstanding balances at the Reporting Date

 

At June 30, 2020, estimated accrued short term incentive compensation to key management personnel totaled $253,000 and was included in accrued liabilities (December 31, 2019 – $540,000).

 

16. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

The non-cash investing and financing activities of the Company include the following:

 

    Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
    2020     2019     2020     2019  
Financing activities                                
Stock options exercised, credited to share capital with an offset to reserves     94             179        
Warrants exercised, credited to share capital with an offset to reserves                 271        
Shares issued on maturity of RSUs, credited to share capital with offset to reserves     66       112       289       112  
Shares issued on vesting of bonus shares, credited to share capital with offset to reserves                 357        
                                 
Investing activities                                
Initial recognition of right of use assets with an offset to lease obligation     (80 )           537        

 

Page 18

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

17. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

(a) Reportable segments

 

The operating segments of the Company are based on the reports which are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in making strategic resource allocation decisions. These operating segments are the Panamanian projects, the Mexican projects, and the corporate office. The projects are each managed by a dedicated General Manager and management team. Additionally, the corporate office oversees the plans and activities of early stage exploration projects, such as the Monitor Gold project.

 

None of these segments yet generate revenue from external customers, and each of the projects are focused on the exploration and evaluation of mineral properties.

 

(b) Geographic segments

 

We conduct our activities in four geographic areas: Mexico, Panama, the United States, and Canada.

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At June 30, 2020                                        
Equipment   $ 235     $ 36     $     $ 72     $ 343  
Exploration and evaluation assets     35,370       82,429       314             118,113  

 

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At December 31, 2019                                        
Equipment   $ 140     $ 48     $     $ 96     $ 284  
Exploration and evaluation assets     42,900       82,429       314             125,643  

 

18. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

 

Our objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the exploration, evaluation, and development of our mineral properties and to maintain a flexible capital structure. In the management of capital, we include long term loans and share capital.

 

There were no changes to our policy for capital management during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020.

 

We manage our capital structure and adjust it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the Company’s capital structure, we may issue new shares, take on additional debt, acquire or dispose of assets, or adjust the amount of cash and short-term investments. To maximize ongoing development efforts, we do not currently pay dividends.

 

At the end of 2019, we entered into a Project Finance Facility (note 9) pursuant to which we have drawn $25 million of a total available $125 million. The Project Finance Facility requires us to maintain a minimum working capital of $5 million.

 

Our investment policy is to invest the Company’s excess cash in low risk financial instruments such as term deposits and higher yield savings accounts with major Canadian banks. By using this strategy, the Company preserves its cash resources and is able to marginally increase these resources through the yields on these investments. Our financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks, which include currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk.

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Our ability to carry out our long-range strategic objectives in future years depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders, and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing exploration and development activities.

 

19. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

(a) Fair value hierarchy

 

To provide an indication of the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, we classify our financial instruments into the three levels prescribed by the accounting standards.

 

Level 1 The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded equity securities) is based on quoted (unadjusted) market prices as at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Company is the closing trading price on the reporting date. Such instruments are included in Level 1.

 

Level 2 The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, we include that instrument in Level 2.

 

Level 3 If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3. We have no financial assets or liabilities included in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

 

At June 30, 2020, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying
value
    Quoted
prices in
active market
for identical
assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Approximate
fair value
due to short
term nature
of the
instrument
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                                    
   Cash and cash equivalents   FVTPL   $ 54,665     $ 54,665     $     $         —     $       —     $ 54,665  
   Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     10                         10       10  
   Restricted funds   Amortized cost     378             378                   378  
        $ 55,053       54,665     $ 378     $     $ 10     $ 55,053  
                                                     
Financial liabilities                                                    
   Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 386     $     $     $     $ 386     $ 386  
   Lease obligation   Amortized cost     539                         539       539  
   Camino Rojo project loan   Amortized cost     13,630             13,630                   13,630  
   Newmont loan   Amortized cost     8,007             8,007                   8,007  
        $ 22,562     $     $ 21,637     $     $ 925     $ 22,562  

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

At December 31, 2019, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying
value
    Quoted
prices in
active market
for identical
assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Approximate
fair value
due to short
term nature
of the
instrument
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                                    
   Cash and cash equivalents   FVTPL   $ 23,106     $ 23,106     $     $        —     $        —     $ 23,106  
   Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     18                         18       18  
   Restricted funds   Amortized cost     509             509                   509  
        $ 23,633       23,106     $ 509     $     $ 18     $ 23,633  
                                                     
Financial liabilities                                                    
   Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 802     $     $     $     $ 802     $ 802  
   Lease obligation   Amortized cost     67                         67       67  
   Camino Rojo project loan   Amortized cost     12,961             12,961                   12,961  
   Newmont loan   Amortized cost     9,647             9,647                   9,647  
        $ 23,477     $     $ 22,608     $     $ 869     $ 23,477  

 

Our policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the reporting period.

 

20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

(a) Commitments

 

During the period ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued purchase orders for long lead equipment necessary for the construction of the Camino Rojo mine. At June 30, 2020, these outstanding purchase orders totaled $12,981,000 (December 31, 2019 – $2,483,000), which we expect will be filled in the next 12 months.

 

In the event of a change in control, the Company is committed to severance payments amounting to approximately $2,550,000 (December 31, 2019 – $2,020,000) to certain officers and management. No amounts have been recorded in these consolidated financial statements to reflect such severance payments.

 

(b) Litigation

 

We may, from time to time, be a party to legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that, if resolved against us, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

21. EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

 

(a) Share Issuances

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, the Company issued common shares from the exercise of stock options (note 14(a)) and warrants (note 13(b)), and the vesting of RSU’s (note 14(b)). Certain bonus shares had vested but had not yet been settled.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

22. EFFECT OF THE CHANGE IN PRESENTATION CURRENCY

 

The effects of the change in presentation currency discussed in note 3 above were as follows.

 

(a) Effect on the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2019

 

    December 31, 2019     January 1, 2019  
    USD     CAD     USD     CAD  
ASSETS                        
Current assets                                
Cash and cash equivalents   US$ 23,106     C$ 30,009     US$ 12,234     C$ 16,686  
Accounts receivable     94       122       282       385  
Prepaid expenses     53       64       151       206  
      23,253       30,195       12,667       17,277  
Restricted funds     509       662       150       205  
Value added taxes recoverable     1,340       1,747       622       849  
Equipment     284       370       252       344  
Exploration and evaluation assets     125,643       163,383       124,099       169,282  
TOTAL ASSETS   US$ 151,029     C$ 196,357     US$ 137,790     C$ 187,957  
                                 
LIABILITIES                                
Current liabilities                                
Trade and other payables   US$ 802     C$ 1,042     US$ 1,278     C$ 1,743  
Accrued liabilities     1,578       2,049       1,405       1,916  
      2,380       3,091       2,683       3,659  
Lease obligations     44       57              
Camino Rojo project loan     12,961       16,833              
Newmont loan     9,647       12,573       4,475       6,103  
Accrued liabilities – long term     261       338              
Site closure provisions     575       748       626       745  
TOTAL LIABILITIES     25,868       33,640       7,784       10,507  
                                 
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                                
Share capital     159,230       208,186       153,852       201,077  
Reserves     30,061       39,348       19,931       25,960  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     (1,027 )     (1,036 )     (3,393 )     4,797  
Accumulated deficit     (63,103 )     (83,781 )     (40,384 )     (54,384 )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY     125,161       162,717       130,006       177,450  
                                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   US$ 151,029     C$ 196,357     US$ 137,790     C$ 187,957  

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Effect on the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the six months ended June 30, 2019

 

    Six months ended
June 30, 2019
 
    USD     CAD  
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENSES                
Assays and analysis   US$ 122     C$ 159  
Drilling     729       972  
Geological     971       1,297  
Engineering     1,302       1,742  
Environmental     317       423  
Community and government     350       467  
Land and water use, claims and concessions     2,312       3,085  
Project management     93       124  
Project review     88       118  
Site activities     886       1,181  
Site administration     1,087       1,450  
      8,257       11,018  
                 
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES                
Office and administrative     284       379  
Professional fees     204       273  
Regulatory and transfer agent     65       87  
Salaries and benefits     833       1,114  
      1,386       1,853  
                 
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)                
Depreciation     47       62  
Share based payments     1,615       2,160  
Interest and finance costs     256       346  
Foreign exchange loss (gain)     20       24  
      1,938       2,592  
                 
LOSS FOR THE YEAR   US$ 11,581     C$ 15,463  
                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME)                
Items that may in future periods be reclassified to profit or loss:                
Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations     (1,138 )     5,443  
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS   US$ 10,443     C$ 20,906  
                 
                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions)     179.5       179.5  
                 
Loss per share - basic and diluted   US$ 0.06     C$ 0.09  

 

Page 23

 

 

Exhibit 99.10

 

 

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

 

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020

  

Amounts in United States dollars

 

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

  

1. Overview

 

Orla Mining Ltd. is a mineral exploration and development company which trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol OLA. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. Refer to page 24 of this document for a list of abbreviations used.

 

Our corporate strategy is to acquire, develop and operate mineral properties where our expertise can substantially increase shareholder value. We have two material gold projects with near-term production potential based on open pit mining and heap leaching – the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project located in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema Gold Project located in Los Santos Province, Panama.

 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the quarter end June 30, 2020. You can find additional information regarding the Company, including our Annual Information Form, on SEDAR under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com.

 

All monetary amounts herein are expressed in United States dollars ($ or US$) unless otherwise stated. C$ refers to Canadian dollars.

 

This MD&A is current as of August 10, 2020.

 

Hans Smit, P.Geo, is the Qualified Person, as the term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). He has reviewed and approved the technical information disclosed in this MD&A. 

 

2. HIGHLIGHTS

 

During the quarter ended June 30, 2020, and to the date of this MD&A:

 

A. Projects

 

· We have anticipated receipt of the required permits to allow us to commence construction of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project in mid-2020. However, review by the Mexican Federal Environment Department (“SEMARNAT”) of the documents required to obtain an operating permit has been delayed by government office closures resulting from the COVID-19 Global Health Emergency. The Mexican Federal Environment Department (“SEMARNAT”) has resumed conducting reviews on Environmental Impact Statements (“Manifestos de Impacto Ambiental” or “MIA”) as of June 1, 2020.

 

· Approximately 58% of the Detailed Engineering at Camino Rojo has been completed and purchase orders have been placed for long lead equipment.

 

· An update to the Camino Rojo Feasibility Study is being prepared to include the layback area resulting in a larger oxide pit from the previously announced agreement with Fresnillo Plc (“Fresnillo”).

 

· Return-to-Work plans and protocols have been implemented at Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema and subsequently approved by the health authorities in each country.

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

B. Financing and Corporate

 

· Cash and cash equivalents balance at June 30, 2020 of $55 million.

 

· Appointed Andrew Cormier as the Chief Operating Officer in April 2020.

 

· Appointed Sean Spraggett as the General Manager, Panama, in July 2020.

  

C. Exploration and Other Project Development

 

· We advanced the Camino Rojo Sulphide Project during the quarter which included additional studies on the resource model and metallurgical testing. Based on the results of these programs, a 5,000-metre diamond drilling program will be undertaken this year to test the geological model and collect samples for additional metallurgical testing.

 

· Regional exploration in Mexico has begun at Las Miserias with 5 of 10 trenches completed to date. Reverse circulation (“RC”) drilling commenced in July with a total of 6,000 metres (“m’) planned. An additional 3,000 m of diamond drilling is planned by the end of the year based on the results from the RC program.

 

· In Panama, the Company continued work to update the Cerro Quema Pre-Feasibility Study. The required field work to support the study has been planned and is expected to begin in the third quarter.

  

COVID-19 Global health emergency

 

The global outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) in 2020 has had a significant impact on businesses through restrictions put in place by governments around the world, including the jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. Our activities have been restricted by government orders related to, among others, travel, business operations, and stay-at-home orders. As of the date of this MD&A, it is not possible to determine the extent of the impact that this global health emergency will have on our activities as the impacts will depend on future developments which themselves are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence. These uncertainties arise from the inability to predict the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, its extent and intensity, the duration of the outbreak, and possible government, societal, and individual responses to the situation.

 

On March 20, 2020, Orla suspended all activities at the Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema projects due to government mandated stay-at-home orders issued in response to the COVID-19 Global Health Emergency.

 

In the second half of May 2020, health officials in Mexico allowed certain industries to restart activites provided they were following all preventive measures. Government offices have resumed reviewing permit applications at a reduced capacity. Procurement and detailed engineering work continues on a remote basis. However, if the current situation results in a delay in obtaining the required environmental permit, it may impact the timing of our contruction schedule, and consequently our timing to production. Authorization to resume activities at Camino Rojo was received from the Mexican health authorities on May 23, 2020 after a plan was presented and all requirements met for a safe return to work.

 

On June 1, 2020, the Panamanian government announced Phase 2 of re-opening, which includes the mining industry. We submitted COVID-19 protocols for the re-opening of site operations and on July 8, 2020 we received approval from the Ministry of Health of Panama for a gradual re-opening of activities. We are planning the restart of exploration activities for September 2020.

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

We continue to monitor our activities, in particular with regard to the safety of our personnel and the communities where we conduct our activities.

 

3. OUTLOOK AND UPCOMING MILESTONES

 

We remain focused on advancing the Company’s strategic objectives and near-term milestones, which include the following:

 

· Continue safe restart of operations in Mexico and Panama and support the continued health of our employees and local communities.

 

· Receive approval for the Environmental Impact Statement (“MIA”) for the Camino Rojo Oxide Project and commence project construction.

 

· Complete Layback Agreement with Fresnillo for the Camino Rojo Oxide Project.

 

· Advance both oxide and sulphide exploration programs at Camino Rojo and at Cerro Quema.

 

· Progress Camino Rojo Sulphide Project studies.

 

· Update the Pre-Feasibility Study at Cerro Quema Oxide Project.

 

· Release a maiden mineral resource estimate for the Caballito discovery at Cerro Quema in Panama.

  

4. DISCUSSION OF OPERATIONS

 

A. Camino Rojo, Mexico

 

Project Description and History

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine and consists of seven concessions covering in aggregate 163,127 hectares. In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc. (now, “Newmont”). Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with untested exploration potential.

 

Canplats Resources Corporation (“Canplats”) initially discovered gold-silver mineralization at Camino Rojo in 2007, and subsequently completed 39,725 metres of drilling, largely delineating the shallow oxide mineralization. Canplats also carried out metallurgical studies prior to being acquired by Newmont in 2010. Newmont then completed more than 250,000 metres of drilling, conducted airborne and ground geophysical surveys, did extensive geological and mineralogical investigations, and conducted numerous metallurgical studies, which included detailed mineralogical studies, column leach tests on oxide material, size fraction analysis, variability test work and sulphide flotation studies.

 

The Ejido San Tiburcio holds the surface rights over the main area of known mineralization. Exploration has been carried out under the authority of agreements between the project operators and the Ejido San Tiburcio. There is a 30-year temporary occupation agreement in place with the Ejido San Tiburcio, with the right to expropriate, covering all the area of the mineral resource and area of potential development described in the “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated effective June 25, 2019 (the “Camino Rojo Report”). Other temporary occupation agreements allow surface access for exploration activities in various other parts of the concession package. The Company has water rights in the area of the proposed development.

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Company has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. However, if sulphide projects are defined through one or more positive pre-feasibility studies with development scenarios either (i) exceeding 500 million tonnes of proven and probable reserves developed as a stand alone operation, or (ii) using the existing infrastructure at the Peñasquito mine, Newmont would have an option to enter into a joint venture with Orla at a 60% or 70% level respectively, for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of such a sulphide project. Upon meeting one of the development scenario criteria, if Newmont then chooses to exercise its option, Orla’s share of the costs to develop a sulphide project would be, at Orla’s option, carried to production by Newmont. If Newmont acquires a portion of a sulphide project in the future through the exercise of its option, Orla would retain a right of first refusal on the future sale by Newmont of any portion of that sulphide project. The Camino Rojo Asset Purchase Agreement was filed on SEDAR on June 28, 2017. Details of the joint venture are available in our news release dated November 7, 2017, which is available here.

 

On June 24, 2019, we issued the results of a positive Feasibility Study along with a mineral reserve estimate on the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project. The Feasibility Study supports a technically simple open-pit mine and heap-leach operation with low capital and operating costs providing rapid payback and a strong financial return. An independent technical report prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 is available at www.sedar.com under Orla's profile and on our website at www.orlamining.com.

  

Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

The Camino Rojo Feasibility Study considers near-surface open pit mining of 44.0 million tonnes of oxide and transitional ore at a throughput rate of 18,000 tonnes per day for an average life of mine gold production of 97,000 ounces annually. Ore from the pit will be crushed to 80% passing 28 mm, conveyor stacked onto a heap leach pad and leached using a low concentration sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant where gold and silver will be precipitated and doré will be produced. The site's proximity to infrastructure, low stripping ratio, compact footprint and flat pad location all contribute to project simplicity, low initial capital of $123 million and low estimated all-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) of $576 per ounce of gold.

 

The Feasibility Study was prepared by a team of independent industry experts led by Kappes Cassiday and Associates ("KCA") and supported by Independent Mining Consultants ("IMC"), Resource Geosciences Incorporated ("RGI"), Barranca Group LLC, Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., and HydroGeoLogica Inc. (“HGL”).

 

The Feasibility Study incorporates geological, assay, engineering, metallurgical, geotechnical, environmental and hydrogeological information collected by Orla and previous owners since 2007, including 370,566 metres of drilling in 911 holes. Predicted average gold recoveries of 64% are based on results from 85 column tests.

 

Operating costs are based on contract mining with all other mine components being owned and operated by Orla. Capital costs were estimated using budgetary supplier quotes for all major and most minor equipment as well as contractor quotes for major construction contracts.

 

The proposed mine is located 3 kilometres from a paved four lane highway and approximately 190 kilometres from the city of Zacatecas. The area is flat and there are no known social or environmental impediments to mining. Orla has all surface, mineral and water rights required to develop the project as presented in the Feasibility Study and existing wells produce in excess of the average 24 litres per second of water required for the project.

 

There are no residents within the area of proposed development. The town of San Tiburcio is located 4 kilometres to the east of the proposed development. Orla has a Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement with the Ejido San Tiburcio and a 30-year temporary occupation agreement with an expropriation right over the 2,497 hectares covering the proposed pit and infrastructure area. Orla has an active community and social program in San Tiburcio and other nearby communities of El Berrendo and San Francisco de los Quijano.

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

We had anticipated commencing construction of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project in mid-2020 upon receipt of all required permits. Government review of the documents required to obtain an operating permit has been delayed by COVID-19 closures and the final permit is now expected during the second half of 2020. Provided the permit is granted in the next few months, we expect first gold production in the second half of 2021.

 

Mineral Reserves

 

Camino Rojo comprises intrusive related, sedimentary strata hosted, polymetallic gold, silver, arsenic, zinc, and lead mineralization. The mineralized zones correspond to zones of sheeted sulphidic veins and veinlet networks, creating a bulk-mineable style of gold mineralization. Mineralization is almost completely oxidized to a depth of approximately 120 metres and then variably oxidized below (transitional to sulphide). The mineral resource estimate was divided into oxide, high and low transitional, and sulphide material. Only the oxide and transitional material were considered in the Feasibility Study for heap leach extraction.

 

The mineral reserve estimate for Camino Rojo is based on an open pit mine plan and mine production schedule developed by IMC. All mineral reserves are located on, and are accessible from, Orla's concessions and support the 6.8-year mine life.

 

The new mineral reserve estimate at Camino Rojo includes proven and probable mineral reserves of 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne ("g/t") and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. All mineral reserves are contained and accessible from within Orla's mineral concessions.

 

Mineral Resources

 

As part of the Feasibility Study efforts, IMC updated the mineral resource estimate from the previous estimate prepared as of April 27, 2018 and previously reported in Orla's May 29, 2018 news release. Mineral resources were divided between oxide and transitional material that could possibly be extracted by open pit mine and processed in a heap leach operation ("Leach Resource") and sulphide material that could possibly be extracted by open pit and processed in a mill ("Mill Resource"). For the Mill Resource, estimates were made for contained gold, silver, lead and zinc. As lead and zinc would not be recovered in a heap leach operation, only gold and silver were estimated for the Leach Resource.

 

Updated measured and indicated mineral resources, inclusive of mineral reserves, amount to 353.4 million tonnes at 0.83 g/t gold and 8.8 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 9.46 million ounces of gold and 100.4 million ounces of silver. Inferred mineral resources are 60.9 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold and 7.4 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 1.70 million ounces of gold and 14.5 million ounces of silver.

 

The mineral reserve and resource estimate for Camino Rojo is available in the Company’s Annual Information Form which was filed on SEDAR on March 23, 2020, and is also accessible on the Company’s website at www.orlamining.com. All of the mineralization comprised in Orla’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by Fresnillo and that waste would be mined on Fresnillo’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on executing the Layback Agreement with Fresnillo, which addresses the oxide and transition portion of the mineral resources that are amendable to heap leaching, and a subsequent agreement addressing the sulphide mineral resources that are not amendable to heap leaching. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on the proposed Layback Agreement and a subsequent agreement being obtained with Fresnillo.

 

The Feasibility Study in the Camino Rojo Report was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on Fresnillo’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, the Layback Agreement with Fresnillo to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Additional details on mineral reserve and resource assumptions, risks and data verification can be found in the independent technical report dated June 25, 2019 prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 and available at www.sedar.com under Orla's profile and on the Company’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Layback Agreement

 

On March 23, 2020, Orla announced that it had entered into a non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo as to the commercial terms on which the Corporation would obtain the right to expand the oxide pit at the Camino Rojo Project onto part of Fresnillo’s mineral concession located immediately to the north of Orla’s property under a proposed Layback Agreement. The proposed Layback Agreement will allow access to oxide and transitional heap leachable mineral resources on Orla’s property below the open pit outlined in the Camino Rojo Report. In addition, the Layback Agreement will provide Orla with the right to mine from Fresnillo’s mineral concession, and recover, for Orla’s account, all oxide and transitional material amenable to heap leaching that are within an expanded open pit.

 

Under the terms of the proposed Layback Agreement, Orla would pay Fresnillo a total cash consideration of $62.8 million based on the following schedule: (i) $10 million due upon the execution of the Layback Agreement; (ii) $15 million due upon Orla having received all funding and permits required for construction and development; or July 1, 2020, whichever is sooner (subsequently revised to the date the Layback Agreement is entered into); (iii) $15 million due no later than (a) 12 months following the commencement of commercial production at the Camino Rojo Project or (b) December 1, 2022, whichever is earlier; and (iv) $22.8 million due no later than (a) 24 months following the commencement of commercial production at the Camino Rojo Project or (b) December 1, 2023, whichever is earlier. The amounts for the third and fourth payments shall bear an interest rate of 5% per annum from the date the Layback Agreement is entered into until the date of payment.

 

The non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo has a term of 12 months and remains subject to execution of the Layback Agreement between the parties, which is currently underway and expected during the third quarter of 2020. The proposed Layback Agreement will not preclude or restrict Fresnillo from participating in any future development of the sulphide mineral resource at the Camino Rojo Project.

 

There can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate the proposed Layback Agreement on terms that are satisfactory to us or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Delays in, or failure to obtain, the proposed Layback Agreement with Fresnillo to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a portion of the oxide and transitional mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to mineralized material at depth. We will require a different agreement with Fresnillo to develop the sulphide portion of the mineral resources. Should a subsequent agreement to access the sulphide mineral resource with Fresnillo not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

Permitting

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by SEMARNAT, the federal government department which has authority over the two principal permits: (1) the Environmental Impact Statement (“Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental” or “MIA”, accompanied by a Risk Study), and (2) a Change of Land Use permit (“CUS”) accompanied by a Technical Justification Study (“ETJ”).

 

In early 2018, Orla resumed environmental assessment activities on the project and surrounding area under the guidance of independent environmental permitting consultant Patricia Aguayo. Data from this work was used in conjunction with information collected by previous operators and project information collected from Orla's consulting engineers to prepare the documents needed to apply for the MIA and CUS permits. The project is not located in an area with any special federal environmental protection designation and no factors were identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required environmental permits.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Permitting documents were submitted to SEMARNAT during the third quarter of 2019. The Company was notified that the CUS was accepted on December 12, 2019 and paid the required fees on January 17, 2020. The Company received a series of questions and requests for additional information on the MIA on November 12, 2019. This is a normal part of the process. A reply was submitted to this on December 20, 2019. On January 13, 2020, SEMARNAT notified the Company of a one-time 60 working-day extension to the MIA review. This would have resulted in the review being completed during the first half of 2020. However, the SEMARNAT offices were closed on March 19, 2020 due to the COVID-19 Global Health Emergency. On June 1, 2020 SEMARNAT resumed reviewing permits at a reduced capacity.

 

We plan to build and operate the project in accordance with International Finance Corporation Performance Standards, as well as the International Council on Mining and Metals principles. We have contracted ERM, a global consulting company, to review the environmental assessment and proposed mitigation measures for the project.

 

Development activities

 

Subsequent to submitting our permit applications in August 2019, we have focussed our work on the detailed engineering and planning required to start construction in 2020. In September 2019, we awarded the engineering, procurement, and construction management (“EPCM”) contract for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project to M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation (“M3”), a full service EPCM firm headquartered in Tucson, Arizona.

 

As of June 30, 2020, approximately 58% of the detailed engineering had been completed. We have placed purchase orders for the crushing package and the heap leach stacking system and have made cash down payments of approximately $11 million for these items.

 

Additional activities completed during the quarter include:

 

· Convened a COVID-19 Emergency Committee to monitor the latest information on the pandemic, and developed plans and protocols for the safe return to work;

 

· Continued detailed engineering;

 

· Approximately 36% of the project budget has been committed for purchase orders and contracts.

 

Camino Rojo Project Loan

 

In December 2019, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) and certain other lenders with respect to a credit debt facility of $125 million for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility was arranged by Trinity Capital and includes a syndicate of lenders led by Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”), Pierre Lassonde, and Trinity Capital.

 

The Credit Facility provides a total of $125 million to the Company, available in three tranches. The first tranche of $25 million was drawn down by the Company on December 18, 2019 upon execution of the definitive loan documentation. Tranches 2 and 3 provide $50 million each, available for drawdown after meeting certain covenants and after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of certain key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo project. There is no guarantee that all conditions precedent and covenants will be met in a timely manner and failure to do so could delay or prevent further draws from the Credit Facility in the future.

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Regional exploration

 

As well as development-related activities, we continue to conduct a regional exploration program. Work completed during the quarter included geological mapping and rock sampling.

 

Work on the project will continue to focus on development-related activities. Regional exploration will continue to involve geology and sampling followed by geophysics in areas where potentially favourable indicators are found. A well-defined chargeability anomaly that is roughly 1,000 by 400 metres in size in the southwest part of the property will be drilled tested, as will a coincident IP and magnetic anomaly northeast of the resource area. Regional exploration has started at Las Miserias with 5 of 10 trenches completed. RC drilling will commence in July with a total of 6,000 metres (“m”) planned. An additional 3,000 m of diamond drilling are planned by the end of the year based on results of the first phase.

 

Community and social

 

We maintain an active community, social relations and environmental management program. During the quarter, there were no environmental incidents. Community activities during the second quarter of 2020 were primarily focused on supporting our local communities and the challenges faced as result of COVID-19 impacts:

 

· Provided support to the local health center during the COVID-19 pandemic including the donation of food, medical and protective equipment;
· Provided training and educational materials regarding the coronavirus to local communities;
· Continued to provide support to the community in efforts to maintain a doctor assigned to the community.

  

B. Cerro Quema Project, Panama

 

Project Description and History

 

Our 100%-owned Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open pit mine with process by heap leaching. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the areas of the current mineral resources and mineral reserves, proposed mine development, and the priority drill targets.

 

The Company owns the surface rights for land required to mine the Cerro Quema mineral reserves and to construct and operate a heap leach facility.

 

A predecessor company to Orla issued a mineral resource estimate and a Pre-Feasibility Study for Cerro Quema, and an independent technical report entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”).

 

The Cerro Quema Report envisions a standard open pit mine with two pits, one at La Pava and one at Quemita, coupled with a 10,000 tonne per day heap leach facility to extract the gold. The project estimates average head grade of 0.77 g/t Au, crush size of 80% passing minus 50 mm, and an average gold recovery of 86%. This would result in 418,000 ounces of gold production over a 5.3-year mine life.

 

The Cerro Quema Report, which contains the 2014 mineral resource and mineral reserve estimate and Pre-Feasibility Study, was filed on SEDAR by Pershimco Resources Inc. on August 22, 2014. You can download it from SEDAR at www.sedar.com or from the Company’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Environmental and permitting

 

We have an ongoing environmental management plan that includes maintaining sediment dams, reforestation of previously disturbed areas and active sediment control activities. Baseline surface water quality sampling and groundwater level measurements are also ongoing.

 

Mineral concessions are comprised of three contracts between the Republic of Panama and Minera Cerro Quema SA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Orla. The original 20-year term for these concessions expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). The Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications were received, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal. We have received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. A permit was received on May 8, 2018 to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018, we received two permits to use water for drilling. An existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current mineral resources was extended for two years in May 2018. In October 2018, the government accepted our 2018 concession tax payments, and in February 2019, we paid the 2019 concession tax payments. A new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions was received on February 11, 2019. All drill permits are currently active. General elections were held in Panama in May 2019, which resulted in a change in federal government effective July 1, 2019.

 

We received a permit for copper exploration on October 17, 2019, two permits allowing temporary use of water for exploration drilling on November 12, 2019, and an additional two temporary water permits on January 13, 2020.

 

On February 3, 2020, the annual concession payments were made and accepted.

 

Corporate Social Responsibility

 

We have an active community relations program that includes providing hot lunches to 5 to 15-year-old children studying in the 12 schools located within a 15-kilometre radius of the Cerro Quema project. We also provide support for various local amateur sports teams, a youth orchestra, local fairs, and cultural events.

 

Exploration

 

There were no notable exploration activities at Cerro Quema in the second quarter of 2020. Our exploration programs are expected to begin during the third quarter of 2020.

 

On June 1, 2020, the Panamanian government announced Phase 2 of re-opening, which includes the mining industry. The Company submitted COVID-19 protocols for the re-opening of site operations and on July 8, 2020 we received approval from the Ministry of Health of Panama for a gradual re-opening of activities. We are planning the restart of exploration activities for September 2020.

 

Pre-Feasibility Study

 

In 2020, we plan to update the Cerro Quema Pre-Feasibility Study (“PFS”) on the oxide heap leach gold project initially completed in 2014. This will include updated mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates. In addition to the work on oxide mineralization, we will continue to advance exploration of the Caballito copper-gold sulphide discovery. This style of mineralization, identified in 2018, presents potential value to the project in addition to the current heap-leach oxide gold project. In addition to the 1.2 km long trend north of Caballito through to Quemita, the Pelona area in the eastern part of the project provides extensive target areas for additional Caballito-style mineralization. 

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

C. Non-GAAP Measures

 

We have included certain non-GAAP performance measures as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers and the non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to the Company.

 

All-In Sustaining Costs ("AISC")

 

We have provided an AISC performance measure that reflects all the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, our definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. We believe that this measure is useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow from current operations. Subsequent amendments to the guidance have not materially affected the figures presented.

  

5. SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

 

The figures in the following table are based on the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements which were prepared in accordance with IAS 34 of International Financial Reporting Standards.

 

Effective January 1, 2020, we changed our presentation currency to United States dollars. Internally, we budget in US dollars, report internally in US dollars, our project debt is denominated in US dollars, and our engineering and EPCM reports are presented in US dollars. We believe that presenting our financial information in US dollars is more useful to us internally to manage the business, and more useful to readers because of greater comparability and greater congruence with the underlying currencies of significant transactions.

 

This change in the financial statement presentation currency is an accounting policy change and we have accounted for it retrospectively. The functional currencies of all our entities remained unchanged. We translated the income statements at the average exchange rates for each reporting period. We recognized exchange differences arising from translating our subsidiaries’ financial results to United States dollars in other comprehensive income.

  

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

$ thousands   2020-Q2     2020-Q1     2019-Q4     2019-Q3     2019-Q2     2019-Q1     2018-Q4     2018-Q3  
Exploration expense   $ 770     $ 7,376       3,069       3,630       2,612       5,642       5,046       5,352  
General and administrative     194       185       150       97       83       201       140       111  
Professional fees     230       176       165       170       110       94       134       63  
Regulatory and transfer agent     66       82       111       30       34       31       158       14  
Salaries and wages     527       264       730       423       450       383       640       323  
Depreciation     382       243       6       25       25       22       40       27  
Share based payments     612       772       374       580       673       942       807       450  
Interest income and finance costs     648       612       446       467       34       221       63       15  
Foreign exchange     (1,220 )     479       139             8       13       (88 )     43  
Net loss     2,209       10,189       5,190       5,422       4,029       7,549       6,940       6,398  
Loss per share (basic and diluted)   $ 0.01     $ 0.05     $ 0.03     $ 0.03     $ 0.02     $ 0.04     $ 0.04     $ 0.03  

 

In 2019, we continued work on, completed, and publicly filed the feasibility study for Camino Rojo. We commenced detailed engineering and planning for construction of Camino Rojo. Quarterly variations are due to seasonality and timing of mining concession fees, drilling activities and awaiting results from previous quarters’ exploration activities. In 2020, we commenced detailed engineering for the mine at Camino Rojo, which is now 58% complete.

 

The increased activity at Camino Rojo has led to the acquisition of leased equipment at the project, which has driven a corresponding increase in depreciation expense.

 

Administrative costs and professional fees have trended with the level of activity of the Company, and with major regulatory events such as financings and public listings. In 2018-Q4 we commenced trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange, and in 2019-Q4 we closed a $125 million project credit facility – both events caused one-time increases in regulatory fees and legal fees.

 

Salaries have generally increased in 2019 and into 2020 as we have grown our team in preparation for the construction phase at Camino Rojo. In 2018-Q4, we accrued for payments related to the departure of the former CEO. In 2019-Q4 we incurred payments related to the departure of the former COO.

 

Share based payments expense is generally related to the number of stock options and RSUs vesting during the quarter. The grants occurred during 2018-Q2, 2019-Q1, and 2020-Q1; consequently, those quarters tend to be greater than the others. The increase in share-based payments in 2018-Q4 was related to a one-time option and bonus share grant to the incoming CEO.

 

Interest income is directly related to cash on hand and prevailing interest rates.

 

The Company received $25 million in 2019-Q4 as a first draw on the Camino Rojo project loan, which caused an increase in interest expense, and we can expect larger swings in foreign exchange gains and losses, starting in that quarter. We incurred loan initiation costs and those are being amortized over the next five years.

 

Foreign exchange gains and losses vary based on fluctuation of the Canadian dollar and the Mexican peso versus the US dollar. Near the end of 2020-Q1, there were unusually large swings in the CAD/USD and MXN/USD exchange rates related to economic uncertainty arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

6.             SECOND QUARTER OF 2020

 

The following table is based on accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Figures are expressed in thousands of United States dollars.

 

        Comparison to
last quarter
    Comparison to
same quarter last year
 
$ 000’s   2020-Q2     2020-Q1     Difference     2019-Q2     Difference  
Exploration expense   $ 770     $ 7,376     $ (6,606 )   $ 2,612     $ (1,842 )
General and administrative     194       185       9       83       111  
Professional fees     230       176       54       110       120  
Regulatory and transfer agent     66       82       (16 )     34       32  
Salaries and wages     527       264       263       450       77  
Depreciation     382       243       139       25       357  
Share based payments     612       772       (160 )     673       (61 )
Interest income and finance costs     648       612       36       34       614  
Foreign exchange     (1,220 )     479       (1,699 )     8       (1,228 )
Loss for the quarter   $ 2,209     $ 10,189     $ (7,980 )   $ 4,029     $ (1,820 )

 

Exploration and evaluation expenses during the current quarter are lower than both the previous quarter and the same quarter of 2019. During 2020-Q1, we paid $2.4 million for a Change in Land Use permit, and $3.2 million for land and water use fees, which costs did not occur in the current quarter. In 2019-Q2, we were completing drilling, geology, geophysics and engineering work for the Feasibility Study which was issued later that summer.

 

The increase in salaries and wages from 2020-Q1 is due to the hiring of administration personnel and a new COO, as well as an accrual for severance.

 

During 2020-Q1, the US dollar strengthened against the Mexican peso (the functional currency of our Mexican operations) and the Canadian dollar (the functional currency of the Canadian parent corporation). During 2020-Q2 that trend reversed, and the the US dollar weakened against both currencies, We had net US$ liabilities in our Canadian company during 2020-Q2 which drove much of the FX gain in this quarter.

 

$25 million of the $125 million project loan was drawn down in December 2019; consequently there was no interest expense in 2019-Q2 as the loan had not yet been drawn down.

 

7.             LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES 

 

The Company had working capital of approximately $51 million as at June 30, 2020, compared with $21 million at December 31, 2019. During the current quarter, the Company raised C$75 million ($52.9 million, net of costs) in an equity financing and a further $1.7 milion pursuant to the exercise of options and warrants.

 

Historically the Company's primary source of funding has been the issuance of equity securities for cash, typically through private placements to sophisticated investors and institutions. We have issued common share capital in many of the past few years, pursuant to private placement financings and the exercise of warrants and options. Our access to exploration and construction financing is always uncertain, and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant equity or debt funding.

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

In December 2019, we entered into an agreement for a credit facility for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project. This agreement provides a total of $125 million to the Company, available in three tranches. We drew down the first tranche of $25 million on December 18, 2019 upon execution of the definitive loan documentation. Tranches 2 and 3 provide $50 million each, available for drawdown after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of certain key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo project.

 

As part of the acquisition of the Camino Rojo Gold Project in November 2017, Newmont agreed to provide interest free loans to the Company for all annual land holding costs as incurred at Camino Rojo until December 31, 2019, which loans are to be repaid in cash upon reaching commercial production at Camino Rojo. To the date of these financial statements, a total of MXN 219 million had been advanced pursuant to this agreement. No further advances are expected.

 

Our ability to carry out our long range strategic objectives in future periods depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing activities. We expect to fund the operating costs and the operating and strategic objectives of the Company over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand, and with further equity financings and draws from the Camino Rojo project loan.

 

The Company had material commitments for capital expenditures as of June 30, 2020. Since the beginning of this year, we have made payments totalling approximately $11 million as down payments for long-lead equipment for the Camino Rojo mine.

 

As of the date of this MD&A, the Company had open purchase orders in the amount of $25 million and commited contracts totalling $33 million.

 

8.             OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements requiring disclosure under this section.

 

9.             RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

We had no significant or unusual transactions with related parties. Refer to note 15 of the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements as and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020.

 

10.          CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

 

In preparing the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements, we have made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

We review estimates and their underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.

 

Judgements, estimates, and assumptions that we have made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements include:

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Exploration and evaluation expenditures

 

The application of the Company’s accounting policy for E&E expenditure requires judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely from either future exploitation or sale (prior to which we expense all E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we capitalize the acquisition costs). It also requires us to make judgements on whether activities have reached a stage that permits development of the mineral resource (prior to which they are treated as E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we treat such costs as projects under development and construction).

 

We apply a number of estimates and assumptions, such as the determination of the quantities and types of mineral resources, which itself involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on resource classification (measured, indicated or inferred). These estimates directly impact accounting decisions related to our E&E expenditures.

 

We make certain estimates and assumptions about future events and circumstances; particularly, whether economic mineral exploitation is viable. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, we assess indicators of impairment and may conclude to write off such amounts to the statement of profit or loss.

 

Assessment of impairment indicators

 

We apply judgement in assessing whether indicators of impairment or reverse impairment exist for our E&E assets which could result in a test for impairment. We consider internal and external factors, such as our rights to explore, planned expenditures on E&E activities, the technical results of our E&E activities, and the potential for viable operations, to determine whether there are any indicators of impairment or reversal of a previous impairment.

 

Title to mineral properties

 

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. Further, we make judgements for properties where concessions terms have expired, and a renewal application has been made and is awaiting approval. We use judgement as to whether the concession renewal application is probable to be received, but ultimately this is beyond our control. If a renewal application is not approved, we could lose rights to those concession.

 

Functional currency

 

The functional currency for the parent entity and each of its subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of functional currency involves judgements to identify the primary economic environment. We reconsider the functional currency of each entity if there is a change in the underlying transactions, events and conditions which we used to determine the primary economic environment of that entity.

 

11.          FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is inherently exposed to certain financial risks, including market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk, through the use of financial instruments. The timeframe and the manner in which we manage these risks varies based upon our assessment of these risks and available alternatives for mitigation. We do not acquire or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All transactions undertaken are to support our operations.

 

Page 15

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2020
United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

12.          OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

 

As of the date of this MD&A, the Company had the following equity securities outstanding:

 

· 227,152,853 common shares

 

· 49,275,600 warrants

 

· 10,784,985 stock options

 

· 500,000 bonus shares (all of which had vested but had not yet been settled into common shares)

 

· 928,026 restricted share units

 

· 644,525 deferred share units

 

You can find further details about these potentially issuable securities in the notes to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020.

 

Page 16

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

13. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

 

As the Company has not commenced principal operations, historical revenue and expenditure trends are not indicative of future activity. The Company has committed to certain work expenditures and may enter into future agreements. The ability of the Company to fund its future operations and commitments is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing. Risks of the Company’s business include the following:

 

Permits and Licenses

 

The exploitation and development of mineral properties may require the Company to obtain regulatory or other permits and licenses from various governmental licensing bodies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain all necessary permits and licenses that may be required to carry out exploration, development and mining operations on its properties.

 

The Company is awaiting mineral concession renewals at its Cerro Quema Project. There is no assurance that we will receive necessary approvals or extensions, or receive them within a reasonable period of time. Failure to receive the permits or extensions would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations. Additional details are provided in the Cerro Quema Project section of this document.

 

The timing of our ability to construct a mine at Camino Rojo is subject to, and may be affected by, timely review and approval by the Mexican environmental and permitting authorities.

 

Foreign Country and Political Risk

 

The Company’s principal mineral properties are located in Mexico and Panama. The Company is subject to certain risks, including currency fluctuations, possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mineral titles or other mineral rights, opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations, and mineral exploration and mining activities may be affected in varying degrees by political stability and government regulations relating to the mining industry. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its business. Exploration and development may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on future exploitation and production, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange controls, income taxes, royalties on production, expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine and/or site safety.

 

Operating in developing economies such as Mexico and Panama has certain risks, including changes to, or invalidation of, government mining regulations; expropriation or revocation of land or property rights; changes in foreign ownership rights; changes in foreign taxation rates; security issues; corruption; uncertain political climate; narco-terrorist actions or activities; and lack of a stable economic climate.

 

We do not carry political risk insurance.

 

Dependence on Exploration-Stage Properties

 

The Company’s current efforts are focused primarily on exploration stage properties. The Camino Rojo and the Cerro Quema Projects may not develop into commercially viable ore bodies, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s potential mineral resource production, profitability, financial performance and results of operations.

 

Estimates of Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves and Production Risks

 

The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates included in this MD&A are estimates based on a number of assumptions, including those stated herein, and any adverse change to those assumptions could require the Company to lower its mineral resource estimate. Until a deposit is actually mined and processed, the quantity and grades of mineral resources must be considered as estimates only. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. In addition, the quantity and/or economic viability of mineral resources may vary depending on, among other things, metal prices, grades, production costs, stripping ratios, recovery rates, permit regulations and other legal requirements, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions. Any material change in the quantity of mineral resources or grade may affect the economic viability of the Company’s properties. No assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of minerals will in fact be realized or that an identified mineral resource will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) deposit that can be legally and economically exploited. There can also be no assurance that any discoveries of new mineral reserves will be made. Any material reductions in estimates of mineral resources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Camino Rojo Gold Project mineral resource estimate assumes that the Company can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Company

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by another mining company (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study dated June 25, 2019, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The Feasibility Study was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the Feasibility Study.

 

Mineral resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions

 

The estimation of mineral resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

In particular, the estimation of mineral resources for the Camino Rojo Gold Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the mineral resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached.

 

Although all mineralization included in the Company’s mineral resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the mineral resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in mineral resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Mining Industry

 

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the current exploration programs planned by the Company will result in a profitable commercial mining operation.

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on many factors, some of which are the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as metal prices which are highly cyclical and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

 

Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk. The Company’s operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration and development of ore, including unusual and unexpected geology formations, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. The Company’s mineral exploration activities are directed towards the search, evaluation and development of mineral deposits. There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Company as described herein will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of ore. There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the discovery and acquisition of properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company will compete with other interests, many of which with greater financial resources, for the opportunity to participate in promising projects. Significant capital investment is required to achieve commercial production from successful exploration efforts.

 

Government Regulation

 

The exploration activities of the Company are subject to various federal, provincial and local laws governing prospecting, development, taxes, labour standards, toxic substances and other matters. Exploration activities are also subject to various federal, provincial and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, and land reclamation. These laws also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Although the Company’s exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations governing operations and exploration activities, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations, amendments to current laws and regulations or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Company’s activities.

 

Title Matters

 

Although the Company has diligently investigated title to all mineral concessions (either granted or under re-application) and, to the best of its knowledge (except as otherwise disclosed herein), titles to all its properties are in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to any of the Company’s mineral properties and any of the Company’s properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected encumbrances or defects or governmental actions.

 

Land Title

 

The Company has investigated ownership of all surface rights in which it has an interest, and, to the best of its knowledge, its ownership rights are in good standing. However, all surface rights may be subject to prior claims or agreement transfers, and rights of ownership may be affected by undetected defects. While to the best of the Company's knowledge, titles to all surface rights are in good standing; however, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to the surface rights in which the Company has an interest. The properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and titles may be affected by undetected defects.

 

Environmental Risks and Hazards

 

All phases of the Company’s mineral exploration operations are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulations, laws and permits, if any, will not adversely affect the Company’s operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which the Company holds interests which are unknown to the Company at present, which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties. The Company may become liable for such environmental hazards caused by previous owners and operators of the properties even where it has attempted to contractually limit its liability.

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Government approvals and permits are currently, and may in the future be, required in connection with the Company’s operations. To the extent such approvals are required and not obtained; the Company may be curtailed or prohibited from proceeding with planned exploration or development of mineral properties.

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

 

Commodity Prices

 

The profitability of mining operations is significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold and other minerals. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of these minerals and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in metal prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The price of gold and other minerals has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future serious price declines could cause commercial production to be impracticable.

 

Uninsured Risks

 

The Company carries insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers adequate. Risks not insured against include environmental pollution or other hazards against which such corporations cannot insure or against which they may elect not to insure.

 

Compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws

 

Orla is subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (1999). In general, these laws prohibit a company and its employees and intermediaries from bribing or making other prohibited payments to foreign officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. The Company’s primary operations are located in jurisdictions which have been perceived as having fairly high levels of corruption. Orla cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future anti- corruption regulatory requirements to which the Company’s operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

 

Failure to comply with the applicable legislation and other similar foreign laws could expose the Company and/or its senior management to civil and/or criminal penalties, other sanctions and remedial measures, legal expenses and reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the applicable anti-corruption legislation by Canadian or foreign authorities could also have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

As a consequence of these legal and regulatory requirements, the Company has instituted policies with regard to business ethics, which have been designed to ensure that Orla and its employees comply with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that such efforts have been and will be completely effective in ensuring the Company’s compliance, and the compliance of its employees, consultants, contractors and other agents, with all applicable anticorruption laws and regulations.

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

Certain directors of the Company also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in natural resource exploration and development. Consequently, there exists the possibility for such directors to be in a position of conflict. Any decision made by such directors involving the Company will be made in accordance with their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with the Company and such other companies. In addition, such directors will declare, and refrain from voting on, any matter in which such directors may have a conflict of interest.

 

Threat of Infectious Diseases or Outbreaks of Viruses

 

Global markets have been adversely impacted by emerging infectious diseases and/or the threat of outbreaks of viruses, other contagions or epidemic diseases, including the novel coronavirus COVID-19, and many industries, including the mining industry have been impacted. This outbreak has led to a widespread crisis that is adversely affecting the economies and financial markets of many countries. If increased levels of volatility continue or in the event of a rapid destabilization of global economic conditions, there may be an adverse effect on commodity prices, demand for metals, availability of equity or credit, investor confidence, and general financial market liquidity, all of which may adversely affect the Company’s business and the market price of the Company’s securities.

 

In addition, there may not be an adequate response to emerging infectious diseases. There are potentially significant economic and social impacts, including labour shortages and shutdowns, delays and disruption in supply chains, social unrest, government or regulatory actions or inactions, including permanent changes in taxation or policies, decreased demand or the inability to sell and deliver concentrates and resulting commodities, declines in the price of commodities, delays in permitting or approvals, governmental disruptions or other unknown but potentially significant impacts.

 

At this time, we cannot accurately predict what impacts there will be or what effects these conditions will have on its business, including due to uncertainties relating to the ultimate geographic spread, the duration of the outbreak, and the length of restrictions or responses that have been or may be imposed by the governments. Any outbreak or threat of an outbreak of a contagious or epidemic disease could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its ability to finance, its business and financial results and the market price of its securities.

 

14. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This MD&A contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding (i) planned exploration and development programs and expenditures; (ii) the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (iii) expectations on the potential renewal of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema project; (iv) proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema project and the Camino Rojo project; (v) the potential for the discovery of additional mineral resources; (vi) Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits, required agreements with third parties and regulatory approvals, including but not limited to, the receipt of the Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (“ESIA”) permit related to the Cerro Quema project and other necessary permitting required to implement expected future exploration plans; (vii) community and ejido relations; (viii) requirements for additional land; (ix) availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; (x) results of feasibility studies, including but not limited to mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plans and operations, internal rates of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present values, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; (xi) upside opportunities such as pit wall angles, land agreements, and the development of the sulphide mineral resource, and exploration potential; (xii) the timing and costs for production decisions; (xiii) financing timelines and requirements, including the timing and the amount to be secured relating to the Camino Rojo project loan; (xiv) the Camino Rojo project loan, including meeting all the conditions precendent relating to tranches 2 and 3 of the project loan; (xv) timing for start of engineering work, construction, and receipt of permits; (xvi) changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; (xvii) currency and interest rate fluctuations; (xviii) timing for first gold production; and (xix) the Company's objectives and strategies.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, (i) the future price of gold; (ii) anticipated costs and the Company’s ability to fund its programs; (iii) the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities; (iv) the Company’s ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements; (v) the timing and results of drilling programs; (vi) the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Company’s mineral properties; (vii) the obtaining of an agreement with the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein) to develop the entire Camino Rojo Gold Project mineral resource estimate; (viii) the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects; (ix) the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, (x) assumptions regarding the ability to meet the conditions precedent regarding drawdown on the the Camino Rojo project loan; (xi) the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; (xii) that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; (xiii) that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; (xiv) that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; (xv) that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties; (xvi) the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner; and (xvii) the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements include, among others: (i) failing to meet certain conditions precedent to draw the reamining portion of the Camino Rojo project loan; (ii) risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, including changes in economic parameters; (iii) risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; (iv) failure to obtain required regulatory and stock exchange approvals with respect to any Offering; (v) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (vi) delays in or failure to obtain an agreement with the Adjacent Owner with respect to the Camino Rojo Gold Project; (vii) health, safety and environmental risks; (viii) success of exploration, development and operations activities; (ix) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (x) delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (xi) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (xii) uncertainty in estimates of production, capital and operation costs and potential for production and cost overruns; (xiii) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (xiv) the fluctuating price of gold; (xv) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xvi) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; (xvii) competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of mineral reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; and (xviii) the Company’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions.

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risks and Uncertainties” in this MD&A for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this MD&A and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. You are urged to read the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which you can view online under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com

 

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

15. ABBREVIATIONS USED

 

C$ Canadian dollars
   
AIF Annual Information Form
   
AISC All in Sustaining Cost
   
Ag Silver
   
Au Gold
   
Canplats Canplats Resources Corporation
   
Cerro Quema Report
or
2014 PFS
An independent technical report for the Cerro Quema Project entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”) prepared by Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA.  
   
CIM Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
   
Company Orla Mining Ltd.
   
CSR Community and Social Responsibility
   
EPCM Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management
   
ESIA Estudio de Impacto Ambiental, a Panamanian environmental impact study
   
g/t Grams per metric tonne
   
G&A General and administrative costs
   
GAAP Generally accepted accounting principles, which for the Company are IFRS
   
Goldcorp Goldcorp Inc., a predecessor company to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, prior to April 18, 2019.
   
MXN Mexican pesos
   
Newmont Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, a publicly traded company resulting from the combination of Newmont Mining Corporation and Goldcorp Inc., effective April 18, 2019.
   
ha hectares
   
HGL HydroGeoLogica Inc.
   
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
   
IMC Independent Mining Consultants Inc.
   
IP Induced polarization
   
IRR Internal rate of return
   
K tonnes Thousands of metric tonnes
   
Koz Thousands of troy ounces
   
KCA Kappes Cassiday and Associates
   
LOM Life of mine
   
m metres
   
M&I Measured and indicated
   
MD&A Management's Discussion and Analysis
   
MIA Manifiesto de Impacto Ambiental.  In English, an Environmental Impact Statement

 

Page 24

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

NI 43-101 Canadian National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects”

 

NPV Net present value
   
Pb Lead
   
PFS Pre-Feasibility Study
   
RC Reverse circulation
   
RGI Resource Geosciences Incorporated
   
SEDAR The System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval, a filing system operated by the Canadian Securities Administrators, accessible at: www.sedar.com
   
SEMARNAT

Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.

In English, the Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (Mexico)

   
t Metric tonne, equal to 1,000 kilograms (approximately 2,205 pounds)
   
TSX Toronto Stock Exchange
   
$ United States dollars
   
Zn Zinc

 

Page 25

 

Exhibit 99.11

 

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Jason Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended June 30, 2020.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on April 1, 2020 and ended on June 30, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date:      August 10, 2020

 

/s/ Jason Simpson  

Jason Simpson

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.12

 

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended June 30, 2020.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on April 1, 2020 and ended on June 30, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date:       August 10, 2020

 

/s/ Etienne Morin  

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.13 

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

 

ORLA MINING APPOINTS SEAN SPRAGGETT AS GENERAL MANAGER, PANAMA

 

VANCOUVER, BC – July 2, 2020 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the "Company") is pleased to announce that Sean Spraggett has been appointed as General Manager, Panama, effective July 1, 2020.

 

“We are excited to have Sean join the Orla team. His extensive experience in-country and across broader Latin America will serve the Company well as we advance our Cerro Quema project in Panama”, stated Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Orla.

 

Mr. Spraggett has over 25 years of experience in the mining industry and was previously the Country Manager for Stracon mining contractors and supported the development of the Cobre Panama mine. He also led the development and operations of the Constancia mine in Peru for Norsemont Mining prior to its acquisition by Hudbay Minerals. Mr. Spraggett brings mine design, construction, and operations expertise to Orla. He has managed projects and studies at Yanacocha, Cerro Corona, Rio Blanco, Marcobre, La Granja, Cerro Verde, and Toquepala, among others. He holds a B.Sc. degree in Geological Engineering from the University of New Brunswick.

 

Orla remains focused on advancing its Cerro Quema project this year. Key work programs include updating the Pre-Feasibility Study on the Cerro Quema Oxide Project, continuing exploration on both oxide and sulphide target areas with 4,000 metres of drilling planned in 2020, and completing a maiden mineral resource estimate on the Caballito copper-gold sulphide discovery. The Government of Panama has begun the process of reopening the economy, and Phase 2 of a 6-Phase plan commenced on June 1. Cerro Quema is permitted to gradually ramp up operations after presenting its COVID-19 return-to-work protocols to the Ministries of Health, Commerce, and Work on June 8. The Company continues to pay its workforce and support local communities. The Company is awaiting approval from the Government of Panama for the previously submitted environmental permit and mining concession renewal applications.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 160,000 hectares. The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

1

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the timing of meeting certain conditions with respect to the receipt of required permits and licenses, the timing of commencement of construction and exploration activities, the results of exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources and the Company’s objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, the Company’s activities will be in accordance with the Company’s public statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required approvals will be obtained and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources; and risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson
President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Andrew Bradbury

Director, Investor Relations

 

www.orlamining.com
info@orlamining.com

 

2

 

 

Exhibit 99.14

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

2020 RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT PLAN

 

EFFECTIVE APRIL 2, 2020

 

ARTICLE ONE

 

DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

 

Section 1.01 Definitions: For the purposes of this Plan, unless such word or term is otherwise defined herein or the context in which such word or term is used herein otherwise requires, the following words and terms with the initial letter or letters thereof capitalized shall have the following meanings:

 

A. Act” means the Canada Business Corporations Act, or its successor, as amended, from time to time;
     
B. Affiliate” means any corporation that is an affiliate of the Corporation as defined in National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus and Registration Exemptions, as may be amended from time to time;
     
C. Board” means the Board of Directors of the Corporation;
     
D. Cause” with respect to a Participant has the meaning set forth in the Participant’s employment agreement with the Corporation or one of its Affiliates;
     
E. Change of Control” means, in respect of the Corporation: (i) if, as a result of or in connection with the election of directors, the people who were directors (or who were entitled under a contractual arrangement to be directors) of the Corporation before the election cease to constitute a majority of the Board, unless the directors have been nominated by management or approved by a majority of the previously serving directors; (ii) any transaction at any time and by whatever means pursuant to which any person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert as a single control group or any affiliate (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation or in connection with a reorganization of the Corporation) or any one or more directors thereof hereafter “beneficially owns” (as defined in the Act) directly or indirectly, or acquires the right to exercise control or direction over, voting securities of the Corporation representing 50% or more of the then issued and outstanding voting securities of the Corporation, as the case may be, in any manner whatsoever; (iii) the sale, assignment, lease or other transfer or disposition of more than 50% of the assets of the Corporation to a person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation or in connection with a reorganization of the Corporation); (iv) the occurrence of a transaction requiring approval of the Corporation’s shareholders whereby the Corporation is acquired through consolidation, merger, exchange of securities involving all of the Corporation’s voting securities, purchase of assets, amalgamation, statutory arrangement or otherwise by any person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert (other than a short-form amalgamation of the Corporation or an exchange of securities with a wholly- owned subsidiary of the Corporation or a reorganization of the Corporation); or (v) any sale, lease, exchange, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation other than in the ordinary course of business;

 

- 2 -

 

F. Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;
     
G. Committee” means the Board or, if the Board so determines in accordance with Section 2.03 of the Plan, the committee of the Board authorized to administer the Plan which includes any compensation committee of the Board;
     
H. Corporation” means Orla Mining Ltd., a corporation existing under the Act, and includes any successor corporation thereof;

 

I. Deferred Payment Date” means the date, for a Participant under the Plan, after the Restricted Period to which the Participant has elected to defer receipt of the Shares;

 

J. Director” means a member of the Board, or a member of the board of directors of an Affiliate, from time to time;

 

K. Disability” with respect to a Participant, has the meaning set forth in such Participant’s employment or consulting agreement with the Corporation or one of its Affiliates;

 

L. Eligible Consultant” has the meaning of “Consultant” set out in Section 2.22 of National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus and Registration Exemptions, as may be amended or replaced from time to time;

 

M. Eligible Employees” means (a) an individual who is considered an employee of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries under the Income Tax Act (Canada) (and for whom income tax, employment insurance and CPP deductions must be made at source); (b) an individual who works full-time for the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries providing services normally provided by an employee and who is subject to the same control and direction by the Corporation over the details and methods of work as an employee of the Corporation, but for whom income tax deductions are not made at source; or (c) an individual who works for the Corporation or its subsidiary on a continuing and regular basis for a minimum amount of time per week (the number of hours should be disclosed in the submission) providing services normally provided by an employee and who is subject to the same control and direction by the Corporation over the details and methods of work as an employee of the Corporation but for whom income tax deductions are not made at source;

 

N. Fair Market Value” means, at any date, the higher of: (i) weighted average price per share at which the Shares have traded on the TSX during the last five (5) trading days prior to that date; and (ii) the closing price of the Shares on the TSX on the date prior to the relevant date or, if the Shares are not then listed and posted for trading on the TSX, then on such stock exchange on which the Shares are then listed and posted for trading as may be selected for such purpose by the Board, or, if the Shares are not then listed and posted for trading on any stock exchange, then it shall be the fair market value per Share as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion; and for such purposes, the weighted average price per share at which the Shares have traded on the TSX or on any other stock exchange shall be calculated by dividing: (i) the aggregate sale price for all of the Shares traded on such stock exchange during the relevant five (5) trading days by (ii) the aggregate number of Shares traded on such stock exchange during the relevant five (5) trading days;

 

- 3 -

 

O. Good Reason” with respect to a Participant has the meaning set forth in the Participant’s employment agreement with the Corporation or one of its Affiliates;

 

P. Grant Date” means the date that the Restricted Share Unit is granted to a Participant under the Plan, as evidenced by the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter as agreed to by the Participant;

 

Q. Insider” means an insider as defined in the TSX Company Manual;

 

R. Market Value” means the closing trading price of the Shares on the Grant Date or other applicable date, as reported by the TSX. If the Shares are not trading on the TSX, then the Market Value shall be determined based on the trading price on such stock exchange or over-the-counter market on which the Shares are listed and posted for trading as may be selected for such purpose by the Committee. In the event that the Shares are not listed and posted for trading on any stock exchange or over-the-counter market, the Market Value shall be the Fair Market Value of such Shares as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion;

 

S. Participant” means each Eligible Employee, Director or Eligible Consultant to whom Restricted Share Units are granted hereunder;

 

T. Plan” means this Restricted Share Unit Plan, as same may be amended from time to time;

 

U. Restricted Period” means any period of time that a Restricted Share Unit is not exercisable and the Participant holding such Restricted Share Unit remains ineligible to receive Shares, determined by the Committee in its absolute discretion, however, such period of time may be reduced or eliminated from time to time and at any time and for any reason as determined by the Committee, including but not limited to circumstances involving death or disability of a Participant;

 

V. Restricted Share Unit” means a unit credited by means of an entry on the books of the Corporation to a Participant, representing the right to receive, on the expiry of the Restricted Period or, if applicable at a later Deferred Payment Date, fully paid Shares as set out in the Participant’s Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter;

 

W. Restricted Share Unit Award” means an award of Restricted Share Units under the Plan to a Participant;

 

X. Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter” means the letter to the Participant from the Corporation and agreed to by the Participant evidencing the grant of Restricted Share Units;

 

Y. Resignation” means the cessation of employment of the Participant with the Corporation or an Affiliate as a result of resignation;

 

- 4 -

 

Z. Security Based Compensation Arrangement” includes, without limitation: (i) stock option plans for the benefit of employees, Insiders, service providers or any one of such groups; (ii) individual stock options granted to employees, service providers or Insiders if not granted pursuant to a plan previously approved by the Corporation’s security holders; (iii) stock purchase plans where the Corporation provides financial assistance or where the Corporation matches the whole or a portion of the securities being purchased; (iv) stock appreciation rights involving issuances of securities from treasury; (v) any other compensation or incentive mechanism involving the issuance or potential issuances of securities of the Corporation; and (vi) security purchases from treasury by an employee, Insider or service provider which is financially assisted by the Corporation by any means whatsoever, but shall not include the 500,000 Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”;

 

AA. Shares” means the common shares in the capital of the Corporation, as adjusted in accordance with the provisions of Article Five of this Plan;

 

BB. subsidiary” means, in respect of a person, a body corporate or other entity which is directly or indirectly controlled by such person. For such purposes, a person shall be deemed to control another person if such person possesses, directly or indirectly, the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such other person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise;

 

CC. Termination” means (i) in the case of an Eligible Employee, the later of the last day of work and the statutory notice period (if any) following notification of termination of the employment of the Eligible Employee with or without Cause by the Corporation or an Affiliate or notification of termination of the employment of the Eligible Employee for Resignation with or without Good Reason and, for certainty, does not include any period of contractual or common law notice or severance; (ii) in the case of an Eligible Consultant, the termination of the services of the Eligible Consultant by the Corporation or any Affiliate or the Eligible Consultant; and (iii) in the case of a Director, the removal of or failure to re-elect or re-appoint the Director as a director of the Corporation or any Affiliate; for greater certainty, in all cases, other than for death or disability of a Participant;

 

DD. TSX” means the Toronto Stock Exchange;

 

EE. TSX Company Manual” means the TSX Company Manual setting forth the rules and policies of the TSX, as the same may be amended from time to time; and

 

FF. US Participant” means a Participant who would be subject to taxation under the Code in respect of income derived from the Restricted Share Units.

 

- 5 -

 

Section 1.02 Headings: The headings of all articles, Sections, and paragraphs in the Plan are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of the Plan.

 

Section 1.03 Context, Construction: Whenever the singular or masculine are used in the Plan, the same shall be construed as being the plural or feminine or neuter or vice versa where the context so requires.

 

Section 1.04 References to this Restricted Share Unit Plan: The words “herein”, “hereby”, “hereunder”, “hereof” and similar expressions mean or refer to the Plan as a whole and not to any particular article, Section, paragraph or other part hereof.

 

Section 1.05 Canadian Funds: Unless otherwise specifically provided, all references to dollar amounts in the Plan are references to lawful money of Canada.

 

ARTICLE TWO

 

PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT PLAN

 

Section 2.01 Purpose of the Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan provides for the payment of remuneration to Participants to be satisfied by the issuance of Shares for the purpose of advancing the interests of the Corporation and its Affiliates through the motivation, attraction and retention of Eligible Employees, Directors and Eligible Consultants and to secure for the Corporation and the shareholders of the Corporation the benefits inherent in the ownership of Shares or Share equivalent by such persons, it being generally recognized that restricted share plans aid in attracting, retaining and encouraging employees due to the opportunity offered to them to benefit from a proprietary interest in the Corporation.

 

Section 2.02 Administration of the Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan shall be administered by the Committee and the Committee shall have full authority to administer the Plan and to adopt, amend and rescind such rules and regulations for administering the Plan as the Committee may deem necessary in order to comply with the requirements of the Plan. No member of the Committee shall be personally liable for any action taken or determination or interpretation made in good faith in connection with the Plan and all members of the Committee shall, in addition to their rights as Directors, be fully protected, indemnified and held harmless by the Corporation with respect to any such action taken or determination or interpretation made in good faith. The appropriate officers of the Corporation are hereby authorized and empowered to do all things and execute and deliver all instruments, undertakings and applications and writings as they, in their absolute discretion, consider necessary for the implementation of the Plan and of the rules and regulations established for administering the Plan. All costs incurred in connection with the Plan shall be for the account of the Corporation.

 

Section 2.03 Delegation to Committee: All of the powers exercisable hereunder by the Directors may, to the extent permitted by applicable law and as determined by resolution of the Directors, be exercised by a committee of the Board comprised of not less than three Directors, including any compensation committee of the Board.

 

- 6 -

 

Section 2.04 Record Keeping: The Corporation shall maintain a register in which shall be recorded:

 

(a) the name and address of each Participant;
     
(b) the number of Restricted Share Units granted to each Participant; and
     
(c) the number of Shares (if any) issued to each Participant in settlement of fully vested Restricted Share Units.

 

Section 2.05 Determination of Participants and Participation: The Committee shall from time to time determine the Participants who may participate in the Plan. The Committee shall from time to time determine the Participants to whom Restricted Share Units shall be granted and the provisions and restrictions with respect to such grant(s), all such determinations to be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan, and the Committee may take into consideration the present and potential contributions of and the services rendered by the particular Participant to the success of the Corporation and any other factors which the Committee deems appropriate and relevant.

 

Section 2.06 Maximum Number of Shares:

 

(a) The aggregate maximum number of Shares available for issuance from treasury under this Plan, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 5.06, shall not exceed 2,514,118. Under no circumstances may the number of Shares issuable pursuant to Restricted Share Units, together with Shares issuable under all Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, exceed 10% of the total number of Shares then outstanding. For purposes of this Section 2.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non- diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Restricted Share Unit.
     
(b) The maximum number of Restricted Share Units available for grant to any one Person, in a 12 month period pursuant to this Plan and any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, is 5% of the total number of Shares then outstanding. For purposes of this Section 2.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non- diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Restricted Share Unit.
     
(c) The maximum number of Shares which may be issuable at any time to Insiders (as a group) pursuant to this Plan, or together with any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall be 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares at the time of grant. The maximum number of Shares which may be issued within any one year period to Insiders (as a group), pursuant to this Plan, or together with any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall be 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares. For purposes of this Section 2.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non-diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Restricted Share Unit.

 

- 7 -

 

(d) The maximum equity value of Restricted Share Units which may be granted to each Director who is not also an Eligible Employee, together with all Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall not exceed $150,000 (based on the Market Value of the Restricted Share Units) in any fiscal year.

 

(e) For purposes of determining the number of Shares that remain available for issuance under the Plan, the number of Shares underlying any grants of Restricted Share Units that are surrendered, forfeited, waived, repurchased by the Corporation and/or cancelled without the applicable Restricted Period(s) having expired shall be added back to the Plan and again be available for future grant, whereas the number of Shares underlying any grants of Restricted Share Units that are issued shall not be available for future grant.

 

ARTICLE THREE

 

RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS

 

Section 3.01 Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan is hereby established for Eligible Employees, Directors and Eligible Consultants.

 

Section 3.02 Grant of Restricted Share Units: The number of Restricted Share Units awarded will be credited to the Participant’s account, effective as of the Grant Date.

 

Section 3.03 Vesting: A Restricted Share Unit Award granted to a Participant will entitle the Participant, subject to the Participant’s satisfaction of any conditions, restrictions or limitations imposed under the Plan or Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter, to receive one previously unissued Share for each Restricted Share Unit at the end of the Restricted Period or, if applicable, at a later Deferred Payment Date, without any further action on the part of the holder of the Restricted Share Unit in accordance with this Article Three; provided, that for a US Participant, the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the end of the Restricted Period and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance. Concurrent with the determination to grant Restricted Share Units to a Participant, the Committee shall determine the vesting schedule (if any) applicable to such Restricted Share Units. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may settle its obligations with respect to any Restricted Share Units by issuing the applicable Shares to the Participant before the expiration of the Restricted Period or Deferred Payment Date.

 

Section 3.04 Restricted Period: Upon the grant of Restricted Share Units to a Participant, the Committee shall determine the Restricted Period applicable to such Restricted Share Units.

 

Section 3.05 Deferred Payment Date: Participants other than US Participants may elect to defer the receipt of all or any part of their entitlement to Restricted Share Units until a Deferred Payment Date.

 

Section 3.06 Prior Notice of Deferred Payment Date: Participants who elect to set a Deferred Payment Date must give the Corporation written notice of one or more Deferred Payment Dates not later than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period. Participants may change a Deferred Payment Date by providing written notice to the Corporation not later than thirty (30) days prior to the Deferred Payment Date.

 

- 8 -

 

Section 3.07 Termination of Employment:

 

(a) Termination with Cause or Resignation without Good Reason during Restricted Period: Except as provided for in the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter or as determined by the Committee in its discretion, upon the Termination of the employment or services of the Participant, for any reason other than death, disability, Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason, then, all Restricted Share Units will be forfeited by the Participant (other than any vested Restricted Share Units that have been deferred prior to such Termination or Resignation, which Restricted Share Units shall be subject to Section 3.07(c)), and be of no further force and effect, as of the date of Termination;
     
(b) Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason during Restricted Period: Except as provided for in the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter or as determined by the Committee in its discretion, provided that the Participant has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation since the Grant Date, in the event of the Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason of a Participant during the Restricted Period, the Corporation shall issue forthwith Shares in accordance with the Restricted Share Units held by the Participant on the date of the Participant’s Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason, notwithstanding any applicable Deferred Payment Date, provided, that for a US Participant, the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the Participant’s Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance;
     
(c) Termination or Resignation after Restricted Period: Except as provided for in the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter or as determined by the Committee in its discretion, provided that the Participant has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation since the Grant Date, in the event of the Termination or Resignation of a Participant following the Restricted Period and prior to the Deferred Payment Date, the Corporation shall issue forthwith Shares in accordance with the Restricted Share Units held by the Participant;

 

(d) Death: Provided that the Participant has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation since the Grant Date, any Shares represented by Restricted Share Units held by the Participant on the date of the Participant’s death shall be immediately issuable by the Corporation, notwithstanding any Deferred Payment Date, provided, that for a US Participant, the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the Participant’s death and provided further, that such Participant’s estate does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance;

 

(e) Disability: Provided that the Participant has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation since the Grant Date, any Shares represented by Restricted Share Units held by the Participant on the date on which the Participant is determined to be totally disabled shall be immediately issuable by the Corporation within 90 days following the date on which the Participant is determined to be totally disabled, notwithstanding any applicable Deferred Payment Date(s), provided, that for a US Participant the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the date on which the Participant is determined to be totally disabled and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance; and

 

- 9 -

 

(f) Change of Control: In the event of (i) a Change of Control, and (ii) within 12 months of such Change of Control the Corporation terminates the employment of the Participant for any reason other than just cause, then all Restricted Share Units outstanding shall immediately vest on the date of such termination and the Corporation shall forthwith issue the Shares to the Participant, notwithstanding any stated vesting period or any applicable Deferred Payment Date(s); provided, that for a US Participant, except as described below in this paragraph, the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the Participant’s termination and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance. In any event, upon a Change of Control, Participants shall not be treated any more favourably than shareholders of the Corporation with respect to the consideration that the Participants would be entitled to receive for their Shares, provided, however, that for a US Participant any issuance must occur in full within five years of the date of the Change of Control.

 

Section 3.08 Redemption - Fully Paid Shares to the Participant: Subject to Section 4.01, the Corporation will satisfy its payment obligation, net of any applicable taxes and other source deductions required to be withheld by the Corporation, at the end of the Restricted Period or, if applicable, on the later Deferred Payment Date, with the issue of fully paid Shares from treasury in accordance with Section 3.03.

 

Section 3.09 Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter: Each grant of a Restricted Share Unit under the Plan shall be evidenced by a Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter issued by the Corporation and agreed to by the Participant. Such Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter shall be subject to all applicable terms and conditions of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms and conditions which are not inconsistent with the Plan and which the Committee deems appropriate for inclusion in a Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter. The provisions of the various Restricted Share Unit Grant Letters issued under the Plan need not be identical. To the extent that there is any inconsistency between the Plan and the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter or any other communications, the Plan shall prevail.

 

Section 3.10 Payment of Dividends: Subject to the absolute discretion of the Committee, in the event that a dividend (other than a stock dividend) is declared and paid by the Corporation on Shares, the Committee may elect to credit each Participant with additional Restricted Share Units. In such case, the number of additional Restricted Share Units will be equal to the aggregate amount of dividends that would have been paid to the Participant if the Restricted Share Units in the Participant’s account had been Shares, divided by the Market Value of a Share on the date on which dividends were paid by the Corporation. The additional Restricted Share Units awarded to a Participant under this Section 3.10 of this Plan will vest upon the expiry of the Restricted Period or, if applicable, on the later Deferred Payment Date, in respect of the particular Restricted Share Unit Award to which the additional Restricted Share Units relate.

 

Section 3.11 Blackout: Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, in the event that any Restricted Period expires or, if applicable, any Deferred Payment Date occurs during, or within 48 hours after, a self-imposed blackout period on the trading of securities of the Corporation, such Restricted Period or Deferred Payment Date shall be automatically extended until 48 hours after such blackout period has expired.

 

- 10 -

 

Section 3.12 Necessary Approvals: The Plan shall be subject to the approval of the shareholders of the Corporation to be given by a resolution passed at a meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation and acceptance by the TSX or any regulatory authority having jurisdiction over the securities of the Corporation.

 

ARTICLE FOUR

 

TAX MATTERS

 

Section 4.01 Withholding Taxes: The Corporation or its Affiliates may take such steps as are considered necessary or appropriate for the withholding of any taxes which the Corporation or its Affiliate is required by any law or regulation of any governmental authority whatsoever to withhold in connection with any delivery of Shares made under this Plan including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the withholding of all or any portion of any payment or the withholding of the issue of Shares to be issued under the Plan, until such time as the Participant has paid the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation for any amount which the Corporation and its Affiliates are required to withhold with respect to such taxes. For greater certainty, immediately upon delivery of any Shares, the Corporation shall have the right to require that a Participant sell a given number of Shares sufficient to cover any applicable withholding taxes and any other source deductions to be withheld by the Corporation in connection with payments made in satisfaction of the Participant’s vested Restricted Share Units.

 

ARTICLE FIVE

 

GENERAL

 

Section 5.01 Effective Time of Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan shall be effective on April 2, 2020.

 

Section 5.02 Amendment of Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Board or the Committee, as the case may be, may terminate, discontinue or amend the Plan at any time, provided that, without the consent of a Participant, such termination, discontinuance or amendment may not in any manner adversely affect such Participant’s rights under any Restricted Share Unit granted to such Participant under the Plan.

 

The Board or the Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory and shareholder approval, make the following amendments to the Plan or Restricted Share Units under the Plan:

 

(a) amendments to increase the number of Shares, other than by virtue of Section 5.06, which may be issued pursuant to the Plan;
     
(b) amendments to the definition of “Participant” under the Plan which would have the potential of narrowing, broadening or increasing Insider participation;
     
(c) amendments to cancel and reissue Restricted Share Units;
     
(d) amendments to this Section 5.02 of the Plan;
     
(e) amendments that extend the term of a Restricted Share Units;
     
(f) amendments to the participation limits in Section 2.06; or

 

- 11 -

 

(g) amendments to Section 5.03 of the Plan that would permit Restricted Share Units, or any other right or interest of a Participant under the Plan, to be assigned or transferred, other than for normal estate settlement purposes.

 

The Board or the Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory approval (where required), but not subject to shareholder approval, in its sole discretion make all other amendments to the Plan or Restricted Share Units under the Plan that are not of the type contemplated above, including, without limitation:

 

(a) amendments of a housekeeping nature;
     
(b) amendments to the vesting provisions of a Restricted Share Unit or the Plan;
     
(c) amendments to the definitions, other than such definitions noted above;
     
(d) amendments to reflect changes to applicable securities laws; and
     
(e) amendments to ensure that the Restricted Share Units granted under the Plan will comply with any provisions respecting income tax and other laws in force in any country or jurisdiction of which a Participant to whom a Restricted Share Unit has been granted may from time to time be a resident, citizen or otherwise subject to tax therein.

 

Section 5.03 Non-Assignable: Except as otherwise may be expressly provided for under this Plan or pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution, no Restricted Share Unit and no other right or interest of a Participant is assignable or transferable, and any such assignment or transfer in violation of this Plan shall be null and void.

 

Section 5.04 Rights as a Shareholder: No holder of any Restricted Share Units shall have any rights as a shareholder of the Corporation prior to the actual receipt of Shares pursuant to Section 3.03. Subject to Section 5.06, no holder of any Restricted Share Units shall be entitled to receive, and no adjustment shall be made for, any dividends, distributions or any other rights declared for shareholders of the Corporation for which the record date is prior to the date on which the Participant becomes the record owner of such Shares pursuant to Section 3.03.

 

Section 5.05 No Contract of Employment: Nothing contained in the Plan shall confer or be deemed to confer upon any Participant the right to continue in the employment of, or to provide services to, the Corporation or its Affiliates nor interfere or be deemed to interfere in any way with any right of the Corporation or its Affiliates to discharge any Participant at any time for any reason whatsoever, with or without just cause. Participation in the Plan by a Participant shall be voluntary.

 

Section 5.06 Adjustment in Number of Shares Subject to the Restricted Share Unit Plan: In the event there is any change in the Shares, whether by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification, an appropriate adjustment shall be made by the Committee in:

 

(a) the number of Shares available under the Plan; and
     
(b) the number of Shares subject to any Restricted Share Units.

 

If the foregoing adjustment shall result in a fractional Share, the fraction shall be disregarded. All such adjustments shall be conclusive, final and binding for all purposes of the Plan.

 

- 12 -

 

However, if there is an increase in the number of Shares outstanding for any reason other than by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification as described above (for example, as a result of a private placement of Shares or the issuance of Shares in connection with the acquisition of an asset) there will be no adjustment to the number of Shares that a Participant will receive under his or her Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter award and no adjustment to the number of Shares available under the Plan.

 

Section 5.07 Unfunded Plan. The Plan shall be unfunded. The Corporation’s obligations hereunder shall (unless otherwise determined by the Committee) constitute a general, unsecured obligation, payable solely out of its general assets, and no holder of any Restricted Share Units or other person shall have any right to any specific assets of the Corporation. Neither the Corporation nor the Committee shall be required to segregate any assets that may at any time be represented by the amounts credited with respect to Restricted Share Units hereunder. Neither the Corporation nor the Committee shall be deemed to be a trustee of any amounts to be distributed or paid pursuant to the Plan. No liability or obligation of the Corporation pursuant to the Plan shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge of, or encumbrance on, any property of the Corporation or any Affiliate.

 

Section 5.08 No Representation or Warranty: The Corporation makes no representation or warranty as to the future Market Value of any Shares issued in accordance with the provisions of the Plan. No amount will be paid to, or in respect of, a Participant under this Plan or pursuant to any other arrangement, and no additional Restricted Share Units will be granted to such Participant to compensate for a downward fluctuation in the price of the Shares, nor will any other form of benefit be conferred upon, or in respect of, a Participant for such purpose.

 

Section 5.09 Compliance with Applicable Law: If any provision of the Plan or any Restricted Share Unit contravenes any law or any order, policy, by-law or regulation of any regulatory body having jurisdiction, then such provision shall be deemed to be amended to the extent necessary to bring such provision into compliance therewith.

 

Section 5.10 Interpretation: This Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia.

 

 

Exhibit 99.15 

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

ORLA MINING ANNOUNCES ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING VOTING RESULTS

 

VANCOUVER, BC – May 13, 2020 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the "Company") is pleased to announce the voting results for the election of its Board of Directors, which took place at the Company’s Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders (“AGM”) held today. All nominees as set forth in the Company’s management information circular dated April 2, 2020 (“Circular”) were elected as directors of Orla at the AGM. Detailed results of the votes are set out below:

 

Nominee   Votes For     %     Votes Withheld     %  
Charles Jeannes     136,511,550       98.82 %     1,625,927       1.18 %
Richard Hall     138,114,081       99.98 %     23,396       0.02 %
Jason Simpson     136,584,999       98.88 %     1,552,478       1.12 %
Jean Robitaille     136,511,550       98.82 %     1,625,927       1.18 %
George Albino     138,116,681       99.98 %     20,796       0.02 %
Tim Haldane     138,117,281       99.99 %     20,196       0.01 %
David Stephens     136,508,750       98.82 %     1,628,727       1.18 %
Elizabeth McGregor     136,536,682       98.84 %     1,600,795       1.16 %

 

The shareholders also approved: (1) to appoint Ernst & Young LLP as auditor of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorize the board of directors to fix the remuneration of the auditor; (2) adoption of a new Restricted Share Unit (“RSU”) Plan. Results of the shareholder votes on these items are set forth below:

 

    Outcome of
Vote
    Votes For     %     Withheld/
Against
    %  
Appointment of Auditors     Carried       143,448,816       99.99 %     12,000       0.01 %
Adoption of RSU Plan     Carried       130,171,677       94.23 %     7,965,800       5.77 %

 

1

 

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 160,000 hectares. The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson
President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Andrew Bradbury

Director, Investor Relations

 

www.orlamining.com
info@orlamining.com

 

2

 

 

Exhibit 99.16

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

 

Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019

 

Presented in United States dollars

 

     

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars)

 

 

    March 31     December 31     January 1  
As at   2020     2019     2019  
          (restated,
notes 3 and 22)
    (restated,
notes 3 and 22)
 
ASSETS                        
Current assets                        
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 15,422     $ 23,106     $ 12,234  
Accounts receivable     66       94       282  
Prepaid expenses     37       53       151  
      15,525       23,253       12,667  
Restricted funds     509       509       150  
VAT recoverable (note 7)     1,217       1,340       622  
Equipment (note 6)     602       284       252  
Exploration and evaluation assets (note 5(d))     117,573       125,643       124,099  
TOTAL ASSETS   $ 135,426     $ 151,029     $ 137,790  
                         
LIABILITIES                        
Current liabilities                        
Trade and other payables (note 8)   $ 895     $ 802     $ 1,278  
Accrued liabilities     2,805       1,578       1,405  
      3,700       2,380       2,683  
Lease obligations     339       44        
Camino Rojo project loan (note 9)     13,996       12,961        
Newmont loan (note 10)     7,785       9,647       4,475  
Accrued liabilities – long term     375       261        
Site closure provisions (note 11)     558       575       626  
TOTAL LIABILITIES     26,753       25,868       7,784  
                         
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                        
Share capital (note 13)     159,629       159,230       153,852  
Reserves     30,524       30,061       19,931  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     (8,188 )     (1,027 )     (3,393 )
Accumulated deficit     (73,292 )     (63,103 )     (40,384 )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY     108,673       125,161       130,006  
                         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 135,426     $ 151,029     $ 137,790  

 

Events after the reporting period (note 21)

 

Authorized by the Board of Directors on May 12, 2020, for issuance.

 

/s/ Elizabeth McGregor   /s/ Jason Simpson
Elizabeth McGregor, Director   Jason Simpson, Director

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars, except per-share amounts)

 

 

    Three months ended March 31  
    2020     2019
(restated note 3)
 
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENSES (note 5)                
Assays and analysis   $ 15     $ 83  
Drilling           514  
Geological     215       637  
Engineering     278       684  
Environmental     75       144  
Community and government     2,450       185  
Land and water use, claims and concessions     3,228       2,306  
Project management           33  
Project review     6       42  
Site activities     348       584  
Site administration     746       430  
Recognition of site closure provisions     15        
      7,376       5,642  
                 
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES                
Office and administrative     185       201  
Professional fees     176       94  
Regulatory and transfer agent     82       31  
Salaries and benefits     264       383  
      707       709  
                 
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)                
Depreciation (note 6)     243       22  
Share based payments (note 14)     772       942  
Interest income and finance costs (note 12)     612       221  
Foreign exchange loss (gain)     479       13  
      2,106       1,198  
                 
LOSS FOR THE PERIOD   $ 10,189     $ 7,549  
                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME)                
Items that may in future periods be reclassified to profit or loss:                
Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations     7,161       (800 )
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS   $ 17,350     $ 6,749  
                 
                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions)     187.2       179.5  
                 
Loss per share - basic and diluted   $ 0.05     $ 0.04  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars

 

 

    Three months ended March 31  
Cash flows provided by (used in):   2020     2019
(restated note 3)
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES                
Loss for the period   $ (10,189 )   $ (7,549 )
Adjustments for items not affecting cash:                
Depreciation     243       22  
Share based compensation     772       942  
Changes in site closure provisions charged to exploration expense     15        
Newmont loan proceeds received in excess of fair value (note 10)           (715 )
Accretion of the Newmont loan (note 10)     65       268  
Amortization of project loan transaction costs (note 9)     20        
Changes in non-cash working capital:                
Accounts receivable     17       115  
Prepaid expenses     9       32  
Trade and other payables     4       (521 )
Accrued liabilities     1,831       (267 )
Cash used in operating activities     (7,213 )     (7,673 )
                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES                
Proceeds – stock options exercised     91        
Advances received on the Newmont loan           2,674  
Cash provided by financing activities     91       2,674  
                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES                
Purchase of equipment     (47 )      
Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets     (537 )      
Restricted cash funded     (4 )     (246 )
Value added taxes paid, not immediately recoverable     (169 )     (155 )
Cash used in investing activities     (757 )     (401 )
                 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash     195       449  
                 
Net decrease in cash     (7,684 )     (4,951 )
Cash, beginning of period     23,106       12,184  
CASH, END OF PERIOD   $ 15,422     $ 7,233  
                 
Cash consist of:                
Bank current accounts and cash on hand   $ 15,422     $ 7,233  

 

Supplemental cash flow information (note 16)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 4

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited – Thousands of United States dollars)

 

    Common shares     Reserves                    
    Number of
shares (thousands)
    Amount     Share based
payments
reserve
    Warrants
reserve
    Total     Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
    Retained
earnings
(deficit)
    Total  
Balance at January 1, 2019 (restated, note 3)     179,315     $ 153,852     $ 6,867     $ 13,064     $ 19,931     $ (3,393 )   $ (40,384 )   $ 130,006  
Shares issued for property payments     59       48                                     48  
RSUs redeemed     120       113       (113 )           (113 )                  
Share based payments                 942             942                   942  
Loss for the period                                         (7,549 )     (7,549 )
Other comprehensive loss                                   800             800  
Balance at March 31, 2019     179,494     $ 154,013     $ 7,696     $ 13,064     $ 20,760     $ (2,593 )   $ (47,933 )   $ 124,247  
                                                                 
Balance at January 1, 2020     187,102     $ 159,230     $ 8,159     $ 21,902     $ 30,061     $ (1,027 )   $ (63,103 )   $ 125,161  
Options exercised     90       176       (86 )           (86 )                 90  
RSUs redeemed     283       223       (223 )           (223 )                  
Share based payments                 772             772                   772  
Loss for the period                                         (10,189 )     (10,189 )
Other comprehensive loss                                   (7,161 )           (7,161 )
Balance at March 31, 2020     187,475     $ 159,629     $ 8,622     $ 21,902     $ 30,524     $ (8,181 )   $ (73,292 )   $ 108,673  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated). All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

 

Orla Mining Ltd. was incorporated in Alberta in 2007 and was continued into British Columbia in 2010 and subsequently into Ontario under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) in 2014. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. The registered office of the Company is located at Suite 202, 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada.

 

The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties, and holds the Camino Rojo gold and silver project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama.

 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. Different bases of measurement may be appropriate if the Company is not expected to continue operations for the foreseeable future. As at March 31, 2020, the Company had not advanced any of its properties to commercial production and was not able to fund day-to-day activities through operating activities. The Company has received $25 million of a $125 million project loan facility in respect of the Camino Rojo project. Subsequent to the reporting date, the Company completed a C$75 million ($53 million) equity financing.

 

The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon successful results from our mineral exploration and development activities and our ability to attain profitable operations and generate cash or raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations and strategic objectives. We expect to fund operating costs of the Company over the next twelve months with cash on hand and with further loan advances.

 

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION

 

These condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 «Interim Financial Reporting» and do not include all the information required for full annual financial statements.

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

These condensed interim consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.

 

On May 12, 2020, the Board of Directors approved these consolidated financial statements for issuance.

 

3. CHANGE OF PRESENTATION CURRENCY

 

As a result of the continued advancement of the Camino Rojo Project, the Company decided to change its presentation currency from Canadian dollars to United States dollars. The change in the financial statement presentation currency is considered an accounting policy change and has been accounted for retrospectively. The balance sheets for each period presented have been translated from the related subsidiary’s functional currency to the new US dollar presentation currency at the rate of exchange prevailing at the respective balance sheet date except for equity items, which have been translated at accumulated historical rates from the related subsidiary’s date of incorporation. The statements of income and comprehensive income were translated at the average exchange rates for the reporting period, or at the exchange rate prevailing at the date of transactions. Exchange differences arising in 2018 on translation from the related subsidiary’s functional currency to the United States dollar presentation currency have been recognized in other comprehensive income and accumulated as a separate component of equity.

 

In prior reporting periods, the translation of the Company’s subsidiaries that had a United States dollar or Mexican peso functional currency into the Company’s presentation currency of the Canadian dollar gave rise to a translation adjustment which was recorded as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), a separate component of shareholders’ equity. With the retrospective application of the change in presentation currency from the Canadian dollar to the US dollar, the AOCI related to the translation of US dollar functional currency subsidiaries was eliminated. However, with the retrospective application of the change in presentation currency to the US dollar, the Company’s corporate office, which has a Canadian dollar functional currency, resulted in an AOCI balance. The AOCI balance generated by the Mexican peso entities has been adjusted since it now reflects the translation into the new US dollar presentation currency.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(a) Adjustment to previously reported financial information due to change in presentation currency

 

For comparative purposes, the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2019 include adjustments to reflect the change in the presentation currency to the US dollar, which is a change in accounting policy. The exchange rates used to translate the amounts previously reported into US dollars at December 31, 2019 were 1.2988 CAD/USD and 18.87 MXN/USD, and at January 1, 2019 were 1.3642 CAD/USD and 19.65 MXN/USD. Refer to note 22(a) for the effects of the translation.

 

For comparative purposes, the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2019 includes adjustments to reflect the change in the presentation currency to the US dollar, which is a change in accounting policy. The exchange rates used to translate the amounts previously reported into US dollars for the three months ended March 31, 2019 were 1.3296 CAD/USD and 19.21 MXN/USD, which were the average exchange rates for the period. Refer to note 22(b) for the effects of the translation.

 

(b) Functional currency

 

The functional currencies of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned, remained unchanged and were as follows for periods presented.

 

Orla Mining Ltd. Canadian dollars
Minerometalúrgica San Miguel S de RL de CV Mexican pesos
Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV Mexican pesos
Minera Cerro Quema SA United States dollars
Monitor Gold Corporation United States dollars

 

4. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

We applied the same accounting policies in these condensed interim consolidated financial statements as those applied in the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

In preparing these condensed interim consolidated financial statements, the significant judgements we made in applying the Company’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those that applied to the annual consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

You should read these condensed interim consolidated financial statements in conjunction with the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019

(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

5. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION

 

The Company’s exploration and evaluation projects consist of the Camino Rojo Project, the Cerro Quema Project, and the Monitor Gold Project.

 

(a) Camino Rojo Project

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine. In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project, a gold and silver oxide heap leach project located in Zacatecas State, Mexico, from Goldcorp Inc. (now called Newmont Corporation). Consideration consisted of:

 

· 31,860,141 common shares of Orla,
· a 2% net smelter royalty (the “Royalty”) in favor of Newmont on the sale of all metal production from Camino Rojo, and
· Mexican value-added taxes, of approximately 74 million pesos.

 

In addition, the Company and Newmont entered into an option agreement regarding the potential development of sulphide operations at Camino Rojo. Pursuant to the option agreement, Newmont will, subject to the applicable sulphide project meeting certain thresholds, have an option to acquire a 60% or 70% interest in the applicable sulphide project. The Royalty excludes revenue on the sale of metals produced from a sulphide project where Newmont has exercised its Sulphide Option.

 

We maintain a right of first refusal on the sale if Newmont elects to sell the Royalty, in whole or in part.

 

(b) Cerro Quema Project

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, Panama. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open pit mine with process by heap leaching.

 

In December 2016, we acquired 100% of the Cerro Quema Project by acquiring Pershimco Resources Inc. through the issuance of a combination of Orla common shares and warrants, and the assumption of Pershimco’s long term debt, which we subsequently paid off. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the current mineral resource areas, proposed mine development areas, and priority drill target areas.

 

The original 20-year terms for these concessions expired in February and March of 2017. The Company has applied for the prescribed ten year extension to these concessions as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. In March 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications had been received and that exploration work could continue while the Company awaits renewal of the concessions. As of the date of these financial statements, final concession renewals have not been received; however, we continue to receive ongoing drilling, water use, environmental and other permits, and have paid concession taxes, in the normal course.

 

(c) Monitor Gold Project

 

The Monitor Gold Project consists of three separate option agreements consisting of 422 claims covering 3,416 hectares in Nye County, Nevada, USA.

 

To maintain the options, minimum payments and work commitments are required for each year to 2038. In 2019, these consisted of $50,000 in share issuances, a $20,000 in advance royalty payments, and $30,000 in work commitments, all of which requirements were met by the Company. For 2020, these consist of $40,000 in advance royalty payments, and $75,000 in work commitments.

 

Page 8

 

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(d) Exploration and evaluation assets

 

    Camino Rojo     Cerro Quema     Monitor Gold     Total  
Acquisition costs at historical rates                                
At December 31, 2019   $ 42,615     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 125,358  
Additions     537                   537  
At December March 31, 2020   $ 43,152     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 125,895  
                                 
Accumulated foreign exchange on translation                                
At December 31, 2019     285                   285  
Due to changes in exchange rates     (8,607 )                 (8,607 )
At March 31, 2020   $ (8,322 )   $     $     $ (8,322 )
                                 
Acquisition costs                                
At December 31, 2019   $ 42,900     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 125,643  
At March 31, 2020   $ 34,830     $ 82,429     $ 314     $ 117,573  

 

(e) Exploration and evaluation expense

 

Three months ended March 31, 2020   Camino Rojo     Cerro Quema     Monitor Gold     Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 14     $     $ 1     $     $ 15  
Drilling                              
Geological     184       31                   215  
Engineering     244       34                   278  
Environmental     58       17                   75  
Community and government     2,370       80                   2,450  
Land, water use, and claims     3,188             40             3,228  
Project management                              
Project review                       6        
Site activities     148       200                   348  
Site administration     474       272                   746  
Recognition of reclamation obligation     15                         15  
    $ 6,695     $ 634     $ 41     $ 6     $ 7,376  

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Three months ended March 31, 2019   Camino Rojo     Cerro Quema     Monitor Gold     Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 60     $ 23     $     $     $ 83  
Drilling     514                         514  
Geological     278       278       4       77       637  
Engineering     684                         684  
Environmental     144                         144  
Community and government     89       96                   185  
Land, water use, and claims     2,228       1       77             2,306  
Project management     33                         33  
Project review                       42       42  
Site activities     232       352                   584  
Site administration     163       266       1             430  
    $ 4,425     $ 1,016     $ 82     $ 119     $ 5,642  

 

6. EQUIPMENT

 

    Cost     Accumulated depreciation     Net book value  
    Begin of
year
    Changes
during
the
period
    Effect of FX     End of
period
    Begin of
year
    Changes
during
the
period
    Effect of
FX
   

End of

period

    Begin of
year
    End of
period
 
Machinery and equipment   $ 324     $ 4     $ (22 )   $ 306     $ 205     $ 8     $ (3 )   $ 210     $ 119     $ 96  
Office equipment     36             (4 )     32       15       1       (1 )     15       21       17  
Computer eqpt and software     150       5       (13 )     142       96       6       (5 )     97       54       45  
Vehicles     21                   21       2                   2       19       19  
Land – leases           11       (2 )     9             1             1             8  
Buildings – leases     89       303       (55 )     337       18       176       (29 )     165       71       172  
Road vehicles – leases           341       (53 )     288             51       (8 )     43             245  
Total   $ 620     $ 664     $ (149 )   $ 1,135     $ 336     $ 243     $ (46 )   $ 533     $ 284     $ 602  

 

7. VALUE ADDED TAXES (“VAT”) RECOVERABLE

 

Our Mexican entities pay value-added taxes (called “IVA” in Mexico) on certain goods and services we purchase.

 

We also paid 74 million Mexican pesos (approximately $3,860,000) of IVA on the initial acquisition of the Camino Rojo project, which is classified within exploration and evaluation assets as part of acquisition cost (note 5(a) and 5(d)).

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

8. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

 

    March 31,
2020
    December 31,
2019
 
Trade payables   $ 458     $ 492  
Payroll related liabilities     241       208  
Lease obligations – current     196       23  
Interest payable on Camino Rojo project loan           79  
    $ 895     $ 802  

 

9. CAMINO ROJO PROJECT LOAN

 

    Three months
ended
March 31, 2020
    Year
ended
December 31, 2019
 
Balance, beginning of period   $ 12,961     $  
Amounts drawn down during the period           25,000  
Cash transaction costs           (3,158 )
Warrants issued to the lenders           (8,968 )
Amortization of the transaction costs     20       86  
Foreign exchange     1,015       1  
 Balance, end of period   $ 13,996     $ 12,961  

 

10. NEWMONT LOAN

 

As part of the Company’s acquisition of the Camino Rojo project from Newmont (then, Goldcorp Inc.), Newmont agreed to provide interest-free loans to the Company for all the annual landholding costs on the Camino Rojo project from November 7, 2017 until December 31, 2019. The loans are to be repaid upon declaration of commencement of commercial production of a heap leach operation at the Camino Rojo Project. To the date of these financial statements, 219,446,000 pesos had been advanced by Newmont under this agreement. No further advances in respect of this loan are expected.

 

The original agreement provided that the Company may, at its option, repay any amounts owing to Newmont, prior to maturity, in the form of (a) a lump sum cash payment, (b) the issuance of additional common shares of the Company, or (c) a combination of cash and shares (subject to certain maximum ownership limits). Subsequent to the reporting period, the Company agreed with Newmont that the repayment would be in cash.

 

Because the loan is non-interest bearing, for accounting purposes at date of each advance, we discount the expected payments using a risk-adjusted discount rate and estimated repayment date. Amounts received in excess of fair value on the date of the advances were credited to exploration expense.

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

    Mexican pesos
(thousands)
    Mexican pesos
(thousands)
    US dollars  
    Undiscounted     Discounted     (thousands)  
At January 1, 2019     121,865       87,917     $ 4,475  
Advances received     97,601       72,897       3,676  
Accretion during the period           21,886       1,104  
Foreign exchange                 392  
At December 31, 2019     219,466       182,700     $ 9,647  
Accretion during the period           6,542       65  
Foreign exchange                 (1,927 )
At March 31, 2020     219,466       189,242     $ 7,785  

 

11. SITE CLOSURE PROVISIONS

 

    Camino Rojo
Project
    Cerro Quema
Project
    Total  
At December 31, 2019   $ 232     $ 343     $ 575  
At March 31, 2020   $ 215     $ 343     $ 558  

 

12. INTEREST INCOME AND FINANCE COSTS

 

    Three months ended
March 31
 
    2020     2019  
Interest on Camino Rojo project loan (note 9)   $ 581     $  
Amortization of Camino Rojo project loan costs (note 9)     20        
Accretion on Newmont loan (note 10)     65       264  
Interest expense on leases     7        
Interest income     (61 )     (43 )
    $ 612     $ 221  

 

13. SHARE CAPITAL

 

(a) Issued share capital

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we issued 90,000 common shares (year ended December 31, 2019 – 1,358,491) upon the exercise of stock options, for gross proceeds of $90,000 (year ended December 31, 2019 – $1,191,000).

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we issued 283,000 common shares (year ended December 31, 2019 – 202,667) upon the vesting of RSUs (note 14(b)).

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Warrants

 

The following summarizes information about the number of warrants outstanding during the period.

 

Expiry date   Exercise
price
    December 31
2019
    Issued     Exercised     March 31
2020
 
February 15, 2021   $ 2.35       8,790,600                   8,790,600  
July 8, 2021   $ 0.62       570,000                   570,000  
June 12, 2022   $ 1.65       5,842,500                   5,842,500  
November 7, 2022   $ 1.40       3,000,000                   3,000,000  
December 18, 2026   $ 3.00       32,500,000                   32,500,000  
Total number of warrants             50,703,000                   50,703,000  
Weighted average exercise price           $ 2.61     $     $     $ 2.61  

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, 700,000 warrants were exercised, for gross proceeds to the Company of $822,000.

 

14. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

 

The Company has four different forms of share-based payments for eligible recipients – stock options, restricted share units (“RSUs”), deferred share units (“DSUs”), and bonus shares.

 

    Three months ended
March 31
 
Share based payments expense   2020     2019  
Stock options   $ 374     $ 589  
Restricted share units     122       38  
Deferred share units     221       191  
Bonus shares     55       124  
Share based payments expense   $ 772     $ 942  

 

(a) Stock options

 

Stock options outstanding   Number     Weighted
average
exercise price
 
As at January 1, 2019     9,124,005     C$ 1.23  
Granted     2,199,322       1.08  
Exercised     (1,358,491 )     1.16  
Expired or cancelled     (47,500 )     1.48  
As at December 31, 2019     9,917,336       1.20  
Granted     1,033,438       2.21  
Exercised     (90,000 )     1.35  
As at March 31, 2020     10,860,774     C$ 1.30  
Vested, December 31, 2019     7,229,622     C$ 1.22  
Vested, March 31, 2020     8,143,655     C$ 1.24  

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

The options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2020 had an aggregate grant date fair value of $672,000 (C$903,000) which was determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

· expected volatility 45%, expected life 5 years, Canadian dollar risk free interest rate 0.7%, dividends nil.

 

The options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2019 had an aggregate grant date fair value of $737,000 (C$932,000) which was determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

· expected volatility 50%, expected life 5 years, Canadian dollar risk free interest rate 1.5%, dividends nil.

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, 140,000 stock options were exercised, for gross proceeds to the Company of $67,000.

 

(b) Restricted Share Units

 

          Number vesting in the year  
Number of RSUs outstanding:   Total     2020     2021     2022     2023  
Outstanding, December 31, 2019     1,014,972       365,882       365,880       283,210        
Awarded during the period     320,450             106,819       106,816       106,815  
Vested and settled during the period     (283,215 )     (283,215 )                  
Outstanding, March 31, 2020     1,052,207       82,667       472,699       390,026       106,815  

 

RSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares immediately prior to award.

 

(c) Deferred Share Units

 

DSUs outstanding:   Number  
Outstanding, December 31, 2019     508,780  
Awarded     135,745  
Outstanding, March 31, 2020     644,525  

 

DSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares immediately prior to award.

 

(d) Bonus shares

 

During 2017, the Board of Directors awarded 500,000 common shares to the non-executive Chairman of the Company as bonus shares. The bonus shares are subject to a vesting period from June 19, 2017 to June 18, 2020 (the “Eligibility Period”). If the non-executive Chairman ceases to be the director of the Company before the Eligibility Period ends, the bonus shares will be forfeited. The bonus shares will become issuable (1) after the Eligibility Period on the date that the non-executive Chairman ceases to act as a director of the Company, or (2) upon a change of control of the Company.

 

We estimated the fair value of the bonus shares ($1.31 each) based on the market price of the common shares at the date of the grant. Accordingly, the amount of $655,000 is being recognized on a straight line basis over the Eligibility Period.

 

On November 13, 2018, the Board of Directors awarded 1,000,000 bonus shares to an officer of the Company. The bonus shares vest in four tranches of 250,000 bonus shares each, issuable upon the achievement of certain share price thresholds particular to each tranche. Upon initial recognition we estimated the dates that each of these market condition tranches would vest, such dates ranging from December 2019 to March 2022. Consequently, the award date fair value ($537,000, or $0.537 per bonus share) is being recognized over these four periods. Subsequent to the reporting period, the first tranche of these bonus shares, consisting of 250,000 common shares, was issued.

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

   

15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company’s related parties include:

 

Related party   Nature of the relationship
Key management personnel   Key management personnel are the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and members of the Board of Directors of the Company.

 

(a) Key Management Personnel

 

Compensation to key management personnel was as follows:

 

    Three months ended
March 31
 
    2020     2019  
Short term incentive plans                
Salaries   $ 136     $ 173  
Directors’ fees     43       31  
      179       204  
Share based payments     630       755  
Total   $ 809     $ 959  

 

(b) Transactions

 

The Company had no other material transactions with related parties, other than with key management personnel as described above, during the three months ended March 31, 2020, or during the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

(c) Outstanding balances at the Reporting Date

 

At March 31, 2020, estimated accrued short term incentive compensation to key management personnel totaled $480,000 and was included in accrued liabilities (December 31, 2019 – $540,000).

  

Page 15

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

16. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

The non-cash investing and financing activities of the Company include the following:

 

    Three months ended
March 31
 
    2020     2019  
Financing activities                
Stock options exercised, credited to share capital with an offset to reserves     85        
Common shares issued on maturity of RSUs, credited to share capital with an offset to reserves     223       112  
                 
Investing activities                
Initial recognition of right of use assets with an offset to lease obligation     617        

 

17. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

(a) Reportable segments

 

The operating segments of the Company are based on the reports which are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in making strategic resource allocation decisions. These operating segments are the Panamanian projects, the Mexican projects, and the corporate office. The projects are each managed by a dedicated General Manager and management team. Additionally, the corporate office oversees the plans and activities of early stage exploration projects, such as the Monitor Gold project.

 

None of these segments yet generate revenue from external customers, and each of the projects are focused on the exploration and evaluation of mineral properties.

 

(b) Geographic segments

 

We conduct our activities in four geographic areas: Mexico, Panama, the United States, and Canada.

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At March 31, 2020                                        
   Equipment   $ 482     $ 41     $     $ 79     $ 602  
   Exploration and evaluation assets     34,830       82,429       314             117,573  

 

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At December 31, 2019                                        
   Equipment   $ 140     $ 48     $     $ 96     $ 284  
   Exploration and evaluation assets     42,900       82,429       314             125,643  

 

18. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

 

Our objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the exploration, evaluation, and development of our mineral properties and to maintain a flexible capital structure. In the management of capital, we include long term loans and share capital.

 

There were no changes to our policy for capital management during the year.

 

We manage our capital structure and adjust it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the Company’s capital structure, we may issue new shares, take on additional debt, acquire or dispose of assets, or adjust the amount of cash and short-term investments. To maximize ongoing development efforts, we do not currently pay dividends.

 

At the end of 2019, we entered into a Project Finance Facility (note 9) pursuant to which we have drawn $25 million of a total available $125 million. The Project Finance Facility requires us to maintain a minimum working capital of $5 million.

 

Our investment policy is to invest the Company’s excess cash in low risk financial instruments such as term deposits and higher yield savings accounts with major Canadian banks. By using this strategy, the Company preserves its cash resources and is able to marginally increase these resources through the yields on these investments. Our financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks, which include currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk.

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Our ability to carry out our long-range strategic objectives in future years depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders, and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing exploration and development activities.

 

19. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

(a) Fair value hierarchy

 

To provide an indication of the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, we classify our financial instruments into the three levels prescribed by the accounting standards.

 

Level 1 The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded equity securities) is based on quoted (unadjusted) market prices as at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Company is the closing trading price on the reporting date. Such instruments are included in Level 1.

 

Level 2 The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, we include that instrument in Level 2.

 

Level 3 If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3. We have no financial assets or liabilities included in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

 

At March 31, 2020, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying value     Quoted prices
in active
market for
identical assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Approximate fair
value due to
short term
nature of the
instrument
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                                    
   Cash and cash equivalents   FVTPL   $ 15,422     $ 15,422     $     $     $     $ 15,422  
   Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     34                         34       34  
   Restricted funds   Amortized cost     509             509                   509  
        $ 15,965       15,422     $ 509     $     $ 34     $ 15,965  
                                                     
Financial liabilities                                                    
   Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 458     $     $     $     $ 458     $ 458  
   Lease obligation   Amortized cost     535                         535       535  
   Camino Rojo project loan   Amortized cost     13,996             13,996                   13,996  
   Newmont loan   Amortized cost     7,785             7,785                   7,785  
        $ 22,774     $     $ 21,781     $     $ 993     $ 22,774  

 

At December 31, 2019, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying value     Quoted prices
in active
market for
identical assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Approximate fair
value due to
short term
nature of the
instrument
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                                    
   Cash and cash equivalents   FVTPL   $ 23,106     $ 23,106     $     $     $     $ 23,106  
   Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     18                         18       18  
   Restricted funds   Amortized cost     509             509                   509  
        $ 23,633       23,106     $ 509     $     $ 18     $ 23,633  
                                                     
Financial liabilities                                                    
   Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 802     $     $     $     $ 802     $ 802  
   Lease obligation   Amortized cost     67                         67       67  
   Camino Rojo project loan   Amortized cost     12,961             12,961                   12,961  
   Newmont loan   Amortized cost     9,647             9,647                   9,647  
        $ 23,477     $     $ 22,608     $     $ 869     $ 23,477  

 

Our policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the reporting period.

 

20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

(a) Commitments

 

During the period ended March 31, 2020, the Company issued purchase orders for long lead equipment necessary for the construction of the Camino Rojo mine. At March 31, 2020, these outstanding purchase orders totaled $20,878,000 (December 31, 2019 – $2,483,000), which we expect will be filled in the next 12 months. Of this amount, $5,663,000 was paid in April 2020.

 

In the event of a change in control, the Company is committed to severance payments amounting to approximately $2,550,000 (December 31, 2019 – $2,020,000) to certain officers and management. No amounts have been recorded in these consolidated financial statements to reflect such severance payments.

 

(b) Litigation

 

We may, from time to time, be a party to legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that, if resolved against us, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

21. EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

 

(a) Equity financing

 

On April 3, 2020, subsequent to the reporting period, the Company closed an equity financing of 36,600,000 common shares at a price of C$2.05 per common share for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of C$75,030,000 ($52,916,000).

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Global health emergency

 

Near the end of the reporting period, there was a global outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”), which has had a significant impact on businesses through the restrictions put in place by the governments in the various jurisdictions where the Company conducts its activities. Our activities are restricted by government orders related to, among others, travel, business operations, and stay-at-home orders. As of the date of these financial statements, it is not possible to determine the extent of the impact that this global health emergency will have on the Company’s activities, because the impacts will depend on future developments which themselves are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence. These uncertainties arise from the inability to predict the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, and possible government, societal, and individual responses to the situation. We continue to monitor our activities, in particular with regard to the safety of our personnel and the communities where we conduct our activities.

 

(c) Other share issuances

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, there were exercises of warrants (see note 13(b)), stock options (see note 14(a)), and the issuance of bonus shares (see note 14(d)).

 

22. EFFECT OF THE CHANGE IN PRESENTATION CURRENCY

 

The effects of the change in presentation currency discussed in note 3 above were as follows.

 

(a) Effect on the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2019

 

    December 31, 2019     January 1, 2019  
    USD     CAD     USD     CAD  
ASSETS                        
Current assets                        
  Cash and cash equivalents   US$ 23,106     C$ 30,009     US$ 12,234     C$ 16,686  
  Accounts receivable   94     122     282     385  
  Prepaid expenses   53     64     151     206  
    23,253     30,195     12,667     17,277  
Restricted funds   509     662     150     205  
Value added taxes recoverable   1,340     1,747     622     849  
Equipment   284     370     252     344  
Exploration and evaluation assets   125,643     163,383     124,099     169,282  
TOTAL ASSETS   US$ 151,029     C$ 196,357     US$ 137,790     C$ 187,957  
                         
LIABILITIES                        
Current liabilities                        
  Trade and other payables   US$ 802     C$ 1,042     US$ 1,278     C$ 1,743  
  Accrued liabilities   1,578     2,049     1,405     1,916  
    2,380     3,091     2,683     3,659  
Lease obligations   44     57          
Camino Rojo project loan   12,961     16,833          
Newmont loan   9,647     12,573     4,475     6,103  
Accrued liabilities – long term   261     338          
Site closure provisions   575     748     626     745  
TOTAL LIABILITIES   25,868     33,640     7,784     10,507  
                         
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                        
  Share capital   159,230     208,186     153,852     201,077  
  Reserves   30,061     39,348     19,931     25,960  
  Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   (1,027 )   (1,036 )   (3,393 )   4,797  
  Accumulated deficit   (63,103 )   (83,781 )   (40,384 )   (54,384 )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY   125,161     162,717     130,006     177,450  
                         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   US$ 151,029     C$ 196,357     US$ 137,790     C$ 187,957  

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Unaudited – United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Effect on the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2019

 

    Three months ended
March 31, 2019
 
    USD     CAD  
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENSES            
Assays and analysis   US$ 83     C$ 111  
Drilling   514     683  
Geological   637     847  
Engineering   684     909  
Environmental   144     192  
Community and government   185     245  
Land and water use, claims and concessions   2,306     3,067  
Project management   33     44  
Project review   42     56  
Site activities   584     777  
Site administration   430     572  
    5,642     7,503  
             
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES            
Office and administrative   201     217  
Professional fees   94     125  
Regulatory and transfer agent   31     41  
Salaries and benefits   383     550  
    709     933  
             
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)            
Depreciation   22     39  
Share based payments   942     1,253  
Interest and finance costs   221     295  
Foreign exchange loss (gain)   13     17  
    1,198     1,604  
             
LOSS FOR THE YEAR   US$ 7,549     C$ 10,040  
             
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME)            
Items that may in future periods be reclassified to profit or loss:            
Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations   (800 )   2,511  
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS   US$ 6,749     C$ 12,551  
             
             
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions)   179.5     179.5  
             
Loss per share - basic and diluted   US$ 0.04     C$ 0.06  

 

Page 20

 

Exhibit 99.17

 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

 

Three months ended March 31, 2020

 

Amounts in United States dollars

 

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

1.            Overview

 

Orla Mining Ltd. is a mineral exploration and development company which trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol OLA. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. Refer to page 28 of this document for a list of abbreviations used.

 

Our corporate strategy is to acquire, develop and operate mineral properties where our expertise can substantially increase shareholder value. We have two material gold projects with near-term production potential based on open pit mining and heap leaching – the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema Gold Project in Panama.

 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the quarter end March 31, 2020. You can find additional information regarding the Company, including our Annual Information Form, on SEDAR under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com.

 

All monetary amounts herein are expressed in United States dollars ($ or US$) unless otherwise stated. C$ refers to Canadian dollars.

 

This MD&A is current as of May 12, 2020.

 

Hans Smit, P.Geo, is the Qualified Person, as the term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). He has reviewed and approved the technical information disclosed in this MD&A.

 

2.            Highlights

 

During the quarter end March 31, 2020, and to the date of this MD&A, the Company:

 

· completed the required payments to the Mexican federal environment department ("SEMARNAT") granting the Change of Land Use permit ("Cambio de Uso de Suelo" or "CUS/ETJ"), one of the two key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project.

 

· entered into a non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo Plc (“Fresnillo”) as to the commercial terms on which Orla would obtain the right to expand the Camino Rojo oxide pit onto part of Fresnillo’s mineral concession located immediately to the north of Orla’s property.

 

· closed a bought deal financing by issuing 36,600,000 common shares at a price of C$2.05 per common share for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of C$75 million.

 

· appointed Andrew Cormier as the new Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Global health emergency

 

Near the end of the reporting period and to the date of this MD&A, there was a global outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”), which has had a significant impact on businesses through the restrictions put in place by the governments in the various jurisdictions where we conduct our activities. Our activities are restricted by government orders related to, among others, travel, business operations, and stay-at-home orders. As of the date of this MD&A, it is not possible to determine the extent of the impact that this global health emergency will have on the Company’s activities, because the impacts will depend on future developments which themselves are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence. These uncertainties arise from the inability to predict the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, and possible government, societal, and individual responses to the situation.

 

Effective March 20, 2020, we suspended all activities at Camino Rojo and at Cerro Quema due to government mandated Stay-at-Home orders issued in response to the COVID-19 Global Health Emergency.

 

At this time, the order in Mexico is in effect until May 30, 2020 and is not expected to delay first production at Camino Rojo in 2021. Procurement and detailed engineering work continues remotely. However, if the current situation results in a delay in obtaining the required approval for the environmental permit, it may impact the timing of our contruction schedule, and consequently our timing to production.

 

We continue to monitor our activities, in particular with regard to the safety of our personnel and the communities where we conduct our activities.

 

 

3.            Discussion of Operations

 

A. Camino Rojo, Mexico

 

Project Description and History

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine and consists of seven concessions covering in aggregate approximately 163,127 hectares. In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc. (now, “Newmont”). Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with untested exploration potential.

 

Canplats Resources Corporation (“Canplats”) initially discovered gold-silver mineralization at Camino Rojo in 2007, and subsequently completed 39,725 metres of drilling, largely delineating the shallow oxide mineralization. Canplats also carried out metallurgical studies prior to being acquired by Newmont in 2010. Newmont then completed more than 250,000 metres of drilling, conducted airborne and ground geophysical surveys, did extensive geological and mineralogical investigations, and conducted numerous metallurgical studies, which included detailed mineralogical studies, column leach tests on oxide material, size fraction analysis, variability test work and sulphide flotation studies.

 

The Ejido San Tiburcio holds the surface rights over the main area of known mineralization. Exploration has been carried out under the authority of agreements between the project operators and the Ejido San Tiburcio. There is a 30-year temporary occupation agreement in place with the Ejido San Tiburcio, with the right to expropriate, covering all the area of the mineral resource and area of potential development described in the “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated effective June 25, 2019 (the “Camino Rojo Report”). Other temporary occupation agreements allow surface access for exploration activities in various other parts of the concession package. The Company has water rights in the area of the proposed development.

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Company has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. However, if sulphide projects are defined through one or more positive pre-feasibility studies with certain development scenarios meeting certain criteria, Newmont has an option to enter into a joint venture with Orla for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of such a sulphide project. If Newmont exercises its option, Orla’s share of the costs to develop the project can be, at Orla’s option, carried to production by Newmont. Orla has a right of first refusal on a sale if Newmont elects to sell its portion of the sulphide project, in whole or in part. The Camino Rojo Asset Purchase Agreement was filed on SEDAR on June 28, 2017. Details of the joint venture are available in our news release dated November 7, 2017, which is available here.

 

On June 24, 2019, we issued the results of a positive Feasibility Study along with a mineral reserve estimate on the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project. The Feasibility Study supports a technically simple open-pit mine and heap-leach operation with low capital and operating costs providing rapid payback and a strong financial return. An independent technical report prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 is available at www.sedar.com under Orla's profile. The new mineral reserve estimate at Camino Rojo includes proven and probable mineral reserves of 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne ("g/t") and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. All mineral reserves are contained and accessible from within Orla's mineral concessions.

 

Updated measured and indicated mineral resources, inclusive of mineral reserves, amount to 353.4 million tonnes at 0.83 g/t gold and 8.83 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 9.46 million ounces of gold and 100.4 million ounces of silver. Inferred mineral resources are 60.9 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold and 7.41 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 1.70 million ounces of gold and 14.5 million ounces of silver. Further details on the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates are provided below and can be found in the technical report dated June 25, 2019.

 

Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

The Camino Rojo Feasibility Study considers near-surface open pit mining of 44.0 million tonnes of oxide and transitional ore at a throughput rate of 18,000 tonnes per day. Ore from the pit will be crushed to 80% passing 28 mm, conveyor stacked onto a heap leach pad and leached using a low concentration sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant where gold and silver will be precipitated and doré will be produced. The site's proximity to infrastructure, low stripping ratio, compact footprint and flat pad location all contribute to project simplicity and relatively low estimated all-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) of $576 per ounce of gold.

 

The Feasibility Study was prepared by a team of independent industry experts led by Kappes Cassiday and Associates ("KCA") and supported by Independent Mining Consultants ("IMC"), Resource Geosciences Incorporated ("RGI"), Barranca Group LLC, Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., and HydroGeoLogica Inc. (“HGL”).

 

Economic Results

 

The Feasibility Study incorporates geological, assay, engineering, metallurgical, geotechnical, environmental and hydrogeological information collected by Orla and previous owners since 2007, including 370,566 metres of drilling in 911 holes. Predicted average gold recoveries of 64% are based on results from 85 column tests.

 

Operating costs are based on contract mining with all other mine components being owned and operated by Orla. Capital costs were estimated primarily using budgetary supplier quotes for all major and most minor equipment as well as contractor quotes for major construction contracts.

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The following tables presents the key assumptions and detailed results of the Feasibility Study:

 

Table 1: Summary of Key Assumptions and Economic Results of the Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

Production Data   Values     Units  
Life of Mine     6.8       years  
Mine Throughput     18,000       tonnes/day  
Mine Throughput     6,570,000       tonnes/year  
Total Tonnes to Crusher     44,020,000       tonnes  
Grade Au (Average)     0.73       g/t  
Grade Ag (Average)     14.2       g/t  
Contained Gold oz     1,031,000       ounces  
Contained Silver oz     20,093,000       ounces  
Metallurgical Recovery Gold (Overall)     64       %  
Metallurgical Recovery Silver (Overall)     17       %  
Average Annual Gold Production     97,000       ounces  
Average Annual Silver Production     511,000       ounces  
Total Gold Produced     662,000       ounces  
Total Silver Produced     3,479,000       ounces  
LOM Strip Ratio     0.54        waste:ore  

 

Operating Costs (Average LOM)              
Mining (mined)   $ 2.14       /tonne mined  
Mining (processed)   $ 3.30       /tonne processed  
Processing & Support   $ 3.38       /tonne processed  
G&A   $ 1.75       /tonne processed  
Total Operating Cost   $ 8.43       /tonne processed  
By-Product Cash Cost   $ 515       /ounce Au  
All-in Sustaining Cost   $ 576       /ounce Au  

 

Capital Costs (excluding value added tax)            
Initial Capital   $ 123       million  
LOM Sustaining Capital   $ 20       million  
LOM Capital   $ 144       million  
Working Capital and Initial Fills   $ 10       million  
Closure Costs   $ 20       million  

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Financial Analysis            
Gold Price Assumption   $ 1,250       /ounce  
Silver Price Assumption   $ 17       /ounce  
Average Annual Cashflow (Pre-Tax)   $ 72       million  
Average Annual Cashflow (After-Tax)   $ 56       million  
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pre-Tax     38.6       %  
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax     28.7       %  
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax)   $ 227       million  
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax)   $ 142       million  
Pay-Back Period (After-Tax)     3.0       years  

 

Note: See reference below regarding non-GAAP metrics. Feasibility Study economics include a 2% royalty and use a USD:MXN exchange rate of 19.3

 

The proposed mine is located 3 kilometres from a paved four lane highway and approximately 190 kilometres from the city of Zacatecas. The area is flat and there are no known social or environmental impediments to mining. Orla has all surface, mineral and water rights required to develop the project as presented in the Feasibility Study and existing wells produce in excess of the average 24 litres per second of water required for the project.

 

There are no residents within the area of proposed development. The town of San Tiburcio is located 4 kilometres to the east of the proposed development. Orla has a Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement with the Ejido San Tiburcio and a 30-year temporary occupation agreement with an expropriation right over the 2,497 hectares covering the proposed pit and infrastructure area. Orla has an active community and social program in San Tiburcio and other nearby communities of El Berrendo and San Francisco de los Quijano.

 

We expect to commence construction of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project in the first half of 2020 upon receipt of all required permits and completion of project financing. First gold production is planned for mid-2021.

 

Sensitivity to Gold Price

 

Table 2: Project Economics Sensitivities to Gold Price

 

Gold Price (US$/oz)   $ 1,150     $ 1,250     $ 1,350     $ 1,450     $ 1,550     $ 1,650     $ 1,750  
After-tax NPV 5% ($ millions)   $ 109     $ 142     $ 174     $ 206     $ 239     $ 271     $ 303  
After-tax IRR (%)     24.0 %     28.7 %     33.2 %     37.6 %     41.8 %     45.8 %     49.6 %
Payback (years)     3.2       3.0       2.7       2.5       2.3       2.1       2.0  

 

Layback Agreement

 

On March 23, 2020, Orla announced that it had entered into a non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo as to the commercial terms on which the Corporation would obtain the right to expand the oxide pit at the Camino Rojo Project onto part of Fresnillo’s mineral concession located immediately to the north of Orla’s property under the proposed Layback Agreement. The proposed Layback Agreement will allow access to oxide and transitional heap leachable mineral resources on Orla’s property below the open pit outlined in the Camino Rojo Report. In addition, the Layback Agreement will provide Orla with the right to mine from Fresnillo’s mineral concession, and recover, for Orla’s account, all oxide and transitional material amenable to heap leaching that are within an expanded open pit.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Under the terms of the proposed Layback Agreement, Orla would pay Fresnillo a total cash consideration of $62.8 million based on the following schedule: (i) $10 million due upon the execution of the Layback Agreement; (ii) $15 million due upon Orla having received all funding and permits required for construction and development; or July 1, 2020, whichever is sooner; (iii) $15 million due no later than (a) 12 months following the commencement of commercial production at the Camino Rojo Project or (b) December 1, 2022, whichever is earlier; and (iv) $22.8 million due no later than (a) 24 months following the commencement of commercial production at the Camino Rojo Project or (b) December 1, 2023, whichever is earlier. The amounts for the third and fourth payments shall bear an interest of 5% per annum from July 1, 2020 until the date of payment.

 

The non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo has a term of 12 months and remains subject to execution of the Layback Agreement between the parties which is currently underway and expected during the first half of 2020. The proposed Layback Agreement will not preclude or restrict Fresnillo from participating in any future development of the sulphide mineral resource at the Camino Rojo Project.

 

There can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate the proposed Layback Agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Delays in, or failure to obtain, the proposed Layback Agreement with Fresnillo to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a portion of the oxide and transitional mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to mineralized material at depth. Orla will require a different agreement with Fresnillo to develop the sulphide portion of the mineral resources. Should a subsequent agreement to access the sulphide mineral resource with Fresnillo not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

Other Opportunities

 

The Feasibility Study only considers oxide and transitional material as testing shows gold cannot be economically recovered by the heap leach method from sulphide material. Orla is actively working on studies to investigate economic opportunities that may exist within the 7.3 million ounces of gold contained within the sulphide measured and indicated mineral resources.

 

Orla has title to mineral concessions covering a very large area around the Camino Rojo deposit. Overburden makes exploration challenging, but the discovery in 2007 of mineralization that is incorporated into this Feasibility Study and mineral resource estimate shows that shallow cover can hide very large near-surface deposits. Orla has been trying various exploration techniques and Induced Polarization ("IP") geophysics appears to be the most useful tool for identifying drill targets. Additional oxide material in the vicinity of the planned development area would leverage the infrastructure being proposed in the Feasibility Study. Any additional sulphide material could add to the long-term potential of the property.

 

Mineral Reserves

 

Camino Rojo comprises intrusive related, sedimentary strata hosted, polymetallic gold, silver, arsenic, zinc, and lead mineralization. The mineralized zones correspond to zones of sheeted sulphidic veins and veinlet networks, creating a bulk-mineable style of gold mineralization. Mineralization is almost completely oxidized to a depth of approximately 120 metres and then variably oxidized below (transitional to sulphide). The mineral resource estimate was divided into oxide, high and low transitional, and sulphide material. Only the oxide and transitional material were considered in the Feasibility Study for heap leach extraction.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The mineral reserve estimate for Camino Rojo is based on an open pit mine plan and mine production schedule developed by IMC. All mineral reserves are located on, and are accessible from, Orla's concessions and support the 6.8-year mine life.

 

The following table presents the initial mineral reserve estimation for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project. Proven and probable mineral reserves amount to 44.0 million tonnes at 0.73 g/t gold and 14.2 g/t silver for 1.03 million contained gold ounces and 20.1 million contained silver ounces. The mineral reserve was estimated based on a gold price of $1,250 per ounce and a silver price of $17.00 per ounce. Measured mineral resource in the mine production schedule was converted to proven mineral reserve and indicated mineral resource in the schedule was converted to probable mineral reserve.

 

Table 3: Camino Rojo Mineral Reserve Estimate

 

Reserve Class   000's tonnes     Gold (g/t)     Silver (g/t)     Gold (koz)     Silver (koz)  
Proven Mineral Reserve     14,595       0.79       15.1       369.7       7,104  
Probable Mineral Reserve     29,424       0.70       13.7       661.1       12,991  
Total Proven & Probable Reserve     44,019       0.73       14.2       1,031.0       20,095  
     
Notes:
1. The mineral reserve estimate has an effective date of June 24, 2019. Mineral reserves are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council (as amended) in accordance with the disclosure requirement of NI 43-101
2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding
3. Mineral reserves are based on prices of $1,250/oz gold, $17/oz silver, USD/MXN exchange rate of 19.3
4. Mineral reserves are based on net smelter return cut-off that vary by time period to balance mine and plant production capacities. They range from a low of $4.73/t to a high of $9.00/t
5. Operating costs — mining $1.94/t mined; process $3.41/t processed; G&A $1.32/t processed, includes a 2% royalty
6. Recoveries for gold — Kp 70%, Ki 56%, Transition Hi 60%; Transition Lo 40%;
Recoveries for silver — Kp 11%, Ki 15%, TrHi 27%, TrLo 34%7.
7. Gold and silver 100% payable; Refining cost per ounce — Au $5.00; Ag $0.50/oz

 

Mineral Resources

 

As part of the Feasibility Study efforts, IMC updated the mineral resource estimate from the previous estimate prepared as of April 27, 2018 and previously reported in Orla's May 29, 2018 news release. Mineral resources were divided between oxide and transitional material that could possibly be extracted by open pit mine and processed in a heap leach operation ("Leach Resource") and sulphide material that could possibly be extracted by open pit and processed in a mill ("Mill Resource"). For the Mill Resource, estimates were made for contained gold, silver, lead and zinc. As lead and zinc would not be recovered in a heap leach operation, only gold and silver were estimated for the Leach Resource.

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Table 4: Camino Rojo Mineral Resource Estimate — Gold & Silver

 

Resource Type   000's
tonnes
    Gold
(g/t)
    Silver
(g/t)
    Gold
(koz)
    Silver
(koz)
 
Leach Resource   Measured Mineral Resource     19,391       0.77       14.9       482.3       9,305  
    Indicated Mineral Resource     75,249       0.70       12.2       1,680.7       29,471  
    Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     94,640       0.71       12.7       2,163.0       38,776  
    Inferred Mineral Resource     4,355       0.86       5.6       119.8       805  
                                             
Mill Resource   Measured Mineral Resource     3,358       0.69       9.2       74.2       997  
    Indicated Mineral Resource     255,445       0.88       7.4       7,221.4       60,606  
    Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     258,803       0.88       7.4       7,295.6       61,603  
    Inferred Mineral Resource     56,564       0.87       7.5       1,576.9       13,713  
                                             
Total Mineral Resource   Measured Mineral Resource     22,749       0.76       14.1       556.5       10,302  
    Indicated Mineral Resource     330,694       0.84       8.5       8,902.1       90,078  
    Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     353,443       0.83       8.8       9,458.6       100,379  
    Inferred Mineral Resource     60,919       0.87       7.4       1,696.7       14,518  

 

Table 5: Camino Rojo Mineral Resource Estimate — Zinc & Lead

 

Resource Type   000's
tonnes
    Lead
(%)
    Zinc
(%)
    Lead
(M lbs)
    Zinc
(M lbs)
 
Mill Resource   Measured Mineral Resource     3,358       0.13       0.38       9.3       28.2  
    Indicated Mineral Resource     255,445       0.07       0.26       404.3       1,468.7  
    Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     258,803       0.07       0.26       413.6       1,496.8  
    Inferred Mineral Resource     56,564       0.05       0.23       63.1       290.4  

 

Notes:
1. The mineral resource has an effective date of June 7, 2019. The mineral resources are classified in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards in accordance with the disclosure requirement of NI 43-101
2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding
3. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability
4. Mineral resources for leach material are based on prices of $1,400/oz gold and $20/oz silver
5. Mineral resources for mill material are based on prices of $1,400/oz gold, $20/oz silver, $1.05/lb lead, and $1.20/lb zinc
6. Mineral resources are based on net smelter return cut-off of $4.73/t for leach material and $13.71/t for mill material
7. Includes 2% royalty and an USD:MXN exchange rate of 19.3
8. Operating costs for Leach resource — mining $1.65/t mined; process $3.41/t processed; G&A $1.32/t processed; Operating costs for Mill resource — mining $1.65/t mined; process $12.50/t processed; G&A $1.20/t processed
9. Leach resource payable — Au 100%; Ag 100%;
Mill resource payable — Au 95%, Ag 95%, Pb 95%, Zn 85%
10. Leach resource refining costs — Au $5.00/oz; Ag $0.50/oz; Mill resource refining costs — Au $1.00/oz; Ag $1.50/oz; Pb $0.194/lb; Zn $0.219/lb
11. The mineral resource estimate assumes that the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto land held by the adjacent owner. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the adjacent owner
12. Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves
13. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an indicated mineral resource and must not be converted to a mineral reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated mineral resources with continued exploration.

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

All of the mineralization comprised in Orla’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by Fresnillo and that waste would be mined on Fresnillo’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on executing the Layback Agreement with Fresnillo, which addresses the oxide and transition portion of the mineral resources that are amendable to heap leaching, and a subsequent agreement addressing the sulphide mineral resources that are not amendable to heap leaching. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on the proposed Layback Agreement and a subsequent agreement being obtained with Fresnillo.

 

The Feasibility Study in the Camino Rojo Report was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on Fresnillo’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, the Layback Agreement with Fresnillo to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

Additional details on mineral reserve and resource assumptions, risks and data verification can be found in the independent technical report dated June 25, 2019 prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 available at www.sedar.com under Orla's profile.

 

Permitting

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by SEMARNAT, the federal government department which has authority over the two principal permits: (1) the Environmental Impact Statement (“Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental” or “MIA”, accompanied by a Risk Study), and (2) a Change of Land Use permit (“CUS”) accompanied by a Technical Justification Study (“ETJ”).

 

In early 2018, Orla resumed environmental assessment activities on the project and surrounding area under the guidance of independent environmental permitting consultant Patricia Aguayo. Data from this work was used in conjunction with information collected by previous operators and project information collected from Orla's consulting engineers to prepare the documents needed to apply for the MIA and CUS permits. The project is not located in an area with any special federal environmental protection designation and no factors were identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required environmental permits.

 

Permitting documents were submitted to SEMARNAT during the third quarter of 2019. The Company was notified that the CUS was accepted on December 12, 2019 and paid the required fees on January 17, 2020. The Company received a series of questions and requests for additional information on the MIA on November 12, 2019. This is a normal part of the process. A reply was submitted to this on December 20, 2019. On January 13, 2020, SEMARNAT notified the Company of a one-time 60 working-day extension to the MIA review. This would have resulted in the review being completed during the first half of 2020. However, the SEMARNAT offices were closed on March 19, 2020 due to the COVID-19 Global Health Emergency. As of the date of this MD&A, government offices remain generally closed.

 

We plan to build and operate the project in accordance with International Finance Corporation Performance Standards, as well as the International Council on Mining and Metals principles. We have contracted ERM, a global consulting company, to review the environmental assessment and proposed mitigation measures for the project.

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Development activities

 

Subsequent to submitting our permit applications in August 2019, we have focussed our work on the detailed engineering and planning required to start construction in 2020. In September 2019, we awarded the engineering, procurement, and construction management (“EPCM”) contract for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project to M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation (“M3”), a full service EPCM firm headquartered in Tucson, Arizona.

 

As of the date of this document, approximately 42% of the detailed engineering has been completed. We have placed purchase orders for the crushing package and the heap leach stacking system, and have made cash down payments for these items.

 

Additional activities completed during the quarter include:

 

· Detailed surveying and additional geotechnical studies for construction,

 

· Identifying and lab testing of clay sources,

 

· Installing of fiber optic to the camp and offices,

 

· Expanding and improving the current camp and offices to house additional personnel for engineering and construction management, and

 

· Hiring a medical doctor and acquiring medical equipment, including an ambulance. Hiring of key personnel at site is substantially complete.

 

Camino Rojo Project Loan

 

In December 2019, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) and certain other lenders with respect to a credit debt facility of $125 million for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility was arranged by Trinity Capital and includes a syndicate of lenders led by Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”), Pierre Lassonde, and Trinity Capital.

 

The Credit Facility provides a total of $125 million to the Company, available in three tranches. The first tranche of $25 million was drawn down by the Company on December 18, 2019 upon execution of the definitive loan documentation. Tranches 2 and 3 provide $50 million each, available for drawdown after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of certain key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo project.

 

The Credit Facility is denominated in United States dollars, and bears interest at 8.80% per annum, payable quarterly commencing March 31, 2020. The principal amount is due upon maturity at December 18, 2024, with no scheduled principal payments prior to maturity. The Company may prepay the loan, in full or in part, at any time during the term without penalty, by using cash flow from operations. The Credit Facility does not impose on the Company any mandatory requirements of hedging, production payments, offtake, streams, or royalties.

 

On December 18, 2019, the Company issued 32.5 million common share purchase warrants to the lenders as part of the project loan. The warrants have an exercise price of C$3.00 per warrant and an expiry date of December 18, 2026, to the lenders.

 

Regional exploration

 

As well as development-related activities, we continue to conduct a limited regional exploration program. Work completed during the quarter included geological mapping and rock sampling.

 

Work on the project will continue to focus on development-related activities. Regional exploration will continue to involve geology and sampling followed by geophysics in areas where potentially favourable indicators are found. A well-defined chargeability anomaly that is roughly 1,000 by 400 metres in size in the southwest part of the property will be drilled tested, as will a coincident IP and magnetic anomaly northeast of the resource area. From mid-March 2020 to the date of this MD&A, we have suspended our field activities due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Activities will resume once we deem it safe, appropriate and when regulations allow.

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Community and social

 

The Company maintains an active community and social relations (“CSR”) program. Significant CSR activities during the first quarter of 2020 we:

 

· Continued reconstruction of a historic building which will be converted into a civic center for the community of San Tiburcio,
· Continued a program started in 2019 of improvements to the local communities’ water wells.
· Supported a number of community events,
· Continued to support Adult Education Programs,
· Conducted an Introduction to Mining course for members of the local communities,
· Provided support to the local health center during the COVID-19 pandemic,
· Provided training and educational materials regarding the coronavirus to local communities,
· Continued to provide support to the community in efforts to maintain a doctor assigned to the community.

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

B. Cerro Quema Project, Panama

 

Project Description and History

 

Our 100%-owned Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open pit mine with process by heap leaching. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the areas of the current mineral resources and mineral reserves, proposed mine development, and the priority drill targets.

 

Mineral concessions are comprised of three contracts between the Republic of Panama and Minera Cerro Quema SA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Orla. The original 20-year term for these concessions expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). The Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications were received, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal. We have received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. A permit was received on May 8, 2018 to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018, we received two permits to use water for drilling. An existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current mineral resources was extended for two years in May 2018. In October 2018, the government accepted our 2018 concession tax payments, and in February 2019, we paid the 2019 concession tax payments. A new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions was received on February 11, 2019. All drill permits are currently active. General elections were held in Panama in May 2019, which resulted in a change in federal government effective July 1, 2019.

 

We received a permit for copper exploration on October 17, 2019, two permits allowing temporary use of water for exploration drilling on November 12, 2019, and an additional two temporary water permits on January 13, 2020.

 

On February 3, 2020, the annual concession payments were made and accepted.

 

The Company owns the surface rights for land required to mine the Cerro Quema mineral reserves and to construct and operate a heap leach facility.

 

A predecessor company to Orla issued a mineral resource estimate and a Pre-Feasibility Study for Cerro Quema, and an independent technical report entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”).

 

The Cerro Quema Report envisions a standard open pit mine with two pits, one at La Pava and one at Quemita, coupled with a 10,000 tonne per day heap leach facility to extract the gold. The project estimates average head grade of 0.77 g/t Au, crush size of 80% passing minus 50 mm, and an average gold recovery of 86%. This would result in 418,000 ounces of gold production over a 5.3-year mine life.

 

The Cerro Quema Report, which contains the 2014 mineral resource and mineral reserve estimate and Pre-Feasibility Study, was filed on SEDAR by Pershimco Resources Inc. on August 22, 2014. You can download it from SEDAR here.

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Table 6: Cerro Quema Mineral Reserves

 

Zone   Category   Cut-Off
(Au g/t)
    Tonnes
(millions)
    Au
(g/t)
    Au
(koz)
 
    Proven     0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
La Pava   Probable     0.21       7.40       0.67       159  
    Sub-Total     0.21       14.22       0.73       335  
    Proven     0.21                    
Quema   Probable     0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
    Sub-Total     0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
    Proven     0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
Total   Probable     0.21       12.89       0.75       312  
    Total     0.21       19.71       0.77       488  

 

Notes:

(1) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
(2) A cut-off grade of 0.21 g/t of gold is used for reporting mineral reserves.
(3) Mineral reserves are estimated at a gold price of $1,300 per ounce.
(4) Effective as of June 30, 2014.
(5) See NI 43-101 Technical Report “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” published on August 15, 2014 for additional information. A copy of the report is available on the Company’s website and under the SEDAR profile of Pershimco Resources Inc. at www.sedar.com.

 

Environmental and permitting

 

The Company has an ongoing environmental management plan that includes maintaining sediment dams, reforestation of previously disturbed areas and active sediment control activities. Baseline surface water quality sampling and groundwater level measurements are also ongoing.

 

CSR

 

The Company has an active community relations program that includes providing hot lunches to 5 to 15-year-old children studying in the 12 schools located within a 15-kilometre radius of the Cerro Quema project. We also provide support for various local amateur sports teams, a youth orchestra, local fairs, and cultural events.

 

Exploration

 

There were no notable exploration activities at Cerro Quema in the first quarter of 2020.

 

Pre-Feasibility Study

 

In 2020, we plan to update the Cerro Quema Pre-Feasibility Study (“PFS”) on the oxide heap leach gold project initially completed in 2014. This will include updated mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates. In addition to the work on oxide mineralization, we will continue to advance exploration of the Caballito copper-gold sulphide discovery. This style of mineralization, identified in 2018, presents potential value to the project in addition to the current heap-leach oxide gold project. In addition to the 1.2 km long trend north of Caballito through to Quemita, the Pelona area in the eastern part of the project provides extensive target areas for additional Caballito-style mineralization. Exploration activities are on hold during the national Stay-at-Home order.

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

C. Non-GAAP Measures

 

We have included certain non-GAAP performance measures as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers and the non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to the Company.

 

Cash Costs per Ounce —

 

We calculated cash costs per ounce by dividing the sum of operating costs, royalty costs, production taxes, refining and shipping costs, net of by-product silver credits, by payable gold ounces. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, we believe that this measure is useful to external users in assessing operating performance.

 

All-In Sustaining Costs ("AISC") —

 

We have provided an AISC performance measure that reflects all the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, our definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. We believe that this measure is useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow from current operations. Subsequent amendments to the guidance have not materially affected the figures presented.

Page 15

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

4. SUMMARY OF RESULTS

 

The figures in the following table are based on the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements which were prepared in accordance with IAS 34 of International Financial Reporting Standards.

 

Effective January 1, 2020, we changed our presentation currency to United States dollars. Internally, we budget in US dollars, report internally in US dollars, our project debt is denominated in US dollars, and our engineering and EPCM reports are presented in US dollars. We believe that presenting our financial information in US dollars is more useful to us internally to manage the business, and more useful to readers because of greater comparability and greater congruence with the underlying currencies of significant transactions.

 

This change in the financial statement presentation currency is an accounting policy change and we have accounted for it retrospectively. Functional currencies of all our entities remained unchanged. We translated the income statements at the average exchange rates for each reporting period. We recognized exchange differences arising from our subsidiaries’ functional currencies to United States dollars in other comprehensive income.

 

$ thousands   2020-Q1     2019-Q4     2019-Q3     2019-Q2     2019-Q1     2018-Q4     2018-Q3     2018-Q2  
Exploration expense   $ 7,376       3,069       3,630       2,612       5,642       5,046       5,352       3,289  
General and administrative     185       150       97       83       201       140       111       98  
Professional fees     176       165       170       110       94       134       63       153  
Regulatory and transfer agent     82       111       30       34       31       158       14       11  
Salaries and wages     264       730       423       450       383       640       323       179  
Depreciation     243       6       25       25       22       40       27       25  
Share based payments     772       374       580       673       942       807       450       1,190  
Interest expense     588       78       2                         2       3  
Amortization of loan costs     20       85                                      
Accretion in value of Newmont loan     65       305       481       56       268       152       115       123  
Interest income     (61 )     (22 )     (16 )     (22 )     (47 )     (89 )     (102 )     (91 )
Foreign exchange     479       139             8       13       (88 )     43       (99 )
Net loss     10,189       5,190       5,422       4,029       7,549       6,940       6,398       4,881  
Loss per share (basic and diluted)   $ 0.05     $ 0.03     $ 0.03     $ 0.02     $ 0.04     $ 0.04     $ 0.03     $ 0.03  

 

In 2019, we continued work on, completed, and publicly filed the feasibility study for Camino Rojo. We commenced detailed engineering and planning for construction of Camino Rojo. Quarterly variations are due to seasonality and timing of mining concession fees, drilling activities and awaiting results from previous quarters’ exploration activities. In 2020, we commenced detailed engineering for the mine at Camino Rojo.

 

The increased activity at Camino Rojo has led to the acquisition of leased equipment at the project, which has driven a corresponding increase in depreciation expense.

 

Administrative costs and professional fees have trended with the level of activity of the Company, and with major regulatory events such as financings and public listings. In 2018-Q4 we commenced trading on the TSX Exchange, and in 2019-Q4 we closed a $125 million project credit facility – both events caused one-time increases in regulatory fees and legal fees.

 

The increase in salaries and wages in 2018-Q3 was related to an accrual of short-term incentive (bonus) payments. In 2018-Q4, we accrued for payments related to the departure of the former CEO. In 2019-Q4 we incurred payments related to the departure of the former COO. Salaries have generally increased in 2019 and into 2020 as we have grown our team in preparation for the construction phase at Camino Rojo.

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Share based payments expense is generally related to the number of stock options and RSUs outstanding vesting during the quarter. The grants occurred during 2018-Q2, 2019-Q1, and 2020-Q1; consequently, those quarters tend to be greater than the others. The increase in share-based payments in 2018-Q4 was related to a one-time options and bonus shares grant to the incoming CEO.

 

Interest income is directly related to cash on hand and prevailing interest rates.

 

The Company received $25 million in 2019-Q4 as a first draw on the Camino Rojo project loan, which caused an increase in interest expense, and we can expect larger swings in foreign exchange gains and losses, starting in that quarter. We incurred loan initiation costs and those are being amortized over the next five years.

 

Foreign exchange gains and losses vary based on fluctuation of the Canadian dollar and the Mexican peso versus the US dollar. Near the end of 2020-Q1, there were unusually large swings in the CAD/USD and MXN/USD exchange rates.

 

4. FIRST QUARTER OF 2020

 

The following table is based on accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Figures are expressed in thousands of United States dollars.

 

A. COMPARISON TO THE PREVIOUS QUARTER

 

$ 000’s    2020-Q1     2019-Q4     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense     7,376       3,069       4,307     Land and water use and mineral concessions fees are paid every six months, in first and third quarter each year.
General and administrative     185       150       35      
Professional fees     176       165       11      
Regulatory and transfer agent     82       111       (29 )    
Salaries and wages     264       730       (466 )   Severance obligations paid in 2019-Q4
Depreciation     243       6       237     Increased activity starting 2020-Q1 at Camino Rojo has led to increases in leases, which are now capitalized and depreciated.
Share based payments     772       374       398     Annual option grant occurred in 2020-Q1
Interest income     (61 )     (22 )     (39 )    
Interest expense     588       78       510     Project loan $25 million commenced Dec 2019
Amortization of loan costs     20       85       (65 )    
Foreign exchange     479       139       340      
Accretion of Newmont loan     65       305       (240 )    
Loss for the quarter   $ 10,189     $ 5,190     $ 4,999      

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

B. COMPARISON TO THE SAME QUARTER LAST YEAR

 

    2020-Q1     2019-Q1     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense     7,376       5,642       1,734     In 2020-Q1 detailed engineering and procurement were the focus which resulted in increased site activities vs 2019-Q1.  In 2019-Q1 we were also active with the Camino Rojo feasibility study.
Office and administrative     185       201       (16 )    
Professional fees     176       94       82      
Regulatory and transfer agent     82       31       51      
Salaries and wages     264       383       (119 )   Severance payments in 2019-Q1
Depreciation     243       22       221     Increase in leases at Camino Rojo
Share based payments     772       942       (170 )   Larger bonus shares expense in 2019-Q1 due to initial grant the previous quarter.
Interest income     (61 )     (47 )     (14 )    
Interest expense     588             588     No project loan in 2019-Q1
Amortization of loan costs     20             20      
Foreign exchange     479       13       466     No project loan in 2019-Q1
Accretion of Newmont loan     65       268       (203 )    
Loss for the quarter   $ 10,189     $ 7,549     $ 4,137      

 

6. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

The Company had working capital of approximately $11.8 million as at March 31, 2020, compared with $20.9 million at December 31, 2019. Subsequent to the quarter end, the Company raised C$75 million ($53 million) in an equity financing.

 

Historically the Company's primary source of funding has been the issuance of equity securities for cash, typically through private placements to sophisticated investors and institutions. We have issued common share capital in many of the past few years, pursuant to private placement financings and the exercise of warrants and options. Our access to exploration and construction financing is always uncertain, and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant equity or debt funding.

 

In December 2019, we entered into an agreement for a credit debt facility for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project. This agreement provides a total of $125 million to the Company, available in three tranches. The first tranche of $25 million was drawn down by the Company on December 18, 2019 upon execution of the definitive loan documentation. Tranches 2 and 3 provide $50 million each, available for drawdown after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of certain key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo project.

 

As part of the acquisition of the Camino Rojo Gold Project in November 2017, Newmont agreed to provide interest free loans to the Company for all annual land holding costs as they are incurred at Camino Rojo until December 31, 2019, which loans are to be repaid in cash or shares (at Orla’s option subject to certain restrictions) upon reaching commercial production at Camino Rojo. To December 31, 2019, a total of MXN 219 million had been advanced pursuant to this agreement.

 

Our ability to carry out our long range strategic objectives in future periods depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing activities. We expect to fund the operating costs and the operating and strategic objectives of the Company over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand, and with further equity financings and draws from the Camino Rojo project loan.

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Company had material commitments for capital expenditures as of March 31, 2020. In April 2020, we issued a payments totalling approximately $5.7 million as down payments for long-lead equipment for the Camino Rojo mine.

 

As of the date of this MD&A, the Company had open purchase orders for long-lead equipment in the amount of $15.2 million.

 

7. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements requiring disclosure under this section.

 

8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

We had no significant or unusual transactions with related parties. Refer to note 15 of the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements as and for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

 

9. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

 

In preparing the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements, we have made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

We review estimates and their underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.

 

Judgements, estimates, and assumptions that we have made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements include:

 

Exploration and evaluation expenditures

 

The application of the Company’s accounting policy for E&E expenditure requires judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely from either future exploitation or sale (prior to which we expense all E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we capitalize the acquisition costs). It also requires us to make judgements on whether activities have reached a stage that permits development of the mineral resource (prior to which they are treated as E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we treat such costs as projects under development and construction).

 

We must also apply a number of estimates and assumptions, such as the determination of the quantities and types of mineral resources, which itself involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on resource classification (measured, indicated or inferred). These estimates directly impact accounting decisions related to our E&E expenditures.

 

We must make certain estimates and assumptions about future events and circumstances, particularly, whether economic mineral exploitation is viable. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available.

 

If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, we assess indicators of impairment and may conclude to write off such amounts to the statement of profit or loss.

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Assessment of impairment indicators

 

We apply judgement in assessing whether indicators of impairment or reverse impairment exist for our E&E assets which could result in a test for impairment. We consider internal and external factors, such as our rights to explore, planned expenditures on E&E activities, the technical results of our E&E activities, and the potential for viable operations, to determine whether there are any indicators of impairment or reversal of a previous impairment.

 

Title to mineral properties

 

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. Further, we make judgements for properties where concessions terms have expired, and a renewal application has been made and is awaiting approval. We use judgement as to whether the concession renewal application is probable to be received, but ultimately this is beyond our control. If a renewal application is not approved, we could lose rights to those concession.

 

Functional currency

 

The functional currency for the parent entity and each of its subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of functional currency involves judgements to identify the primary economic environment. We reconsider the functional currency of each entity if there is a change in the underlying transactions, events and conditions which we used to determine the primary economic environment of that entity.

 

Share based payments

 

We issue, grant or award different types of share based payments. These include warrants, options, restricted share units, deferred share units, and bonus shares.

 

We make judgments of expected forfeiture rates, the expected lives of these instrument, expected volatilities, and risk free interest rates. In a unit offering, we prorate the proceeds between common shares and warrants using the relative fair value method, the allocation of which requires significant judgement. In the case of bonus shares we use our judgement to estimate expected vesting periods and vesting probabilities.

 

10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is inherently exposed to certain financial risks, including market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk, through the use of financial instruments. The timeframe and the manner in which we manage these risks varies based upon our assessment of these risks and available alternatives for mitigation. We do not acquire or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All transactions undertaken are to support our operations.

 

A discussion of these financial risks and our exposure to them is provided in the notes to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

11. OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

 

As of the date of this MD&A, the Company had the following equity securities outstanding:

 

· 225,200,383 common shares

 

· 49,968,100 warrants

 

· 11,370,774 stock options

 

· 1,250,000 bonus shares

 

· 1,052,207 restricted share units

 

· 644,525 deferred share units

 

You can find further details about these potentially issuable securities in the notes to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

 

12. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

 

As the Company has not commenced principal operations, historical revenue and expenditure trends are not indicative of future activity. The Company has committed to certain work expenditures and may enter into future agreements. The ability of the Company to fund its future operations and commitments is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing. Risks of the Company’s business include the following:

 

Permits and Licenses

 

The exploitation and development of mineral properties may require the Company to obtain regulatory or other permits and licenses from various governmental licensing bodies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain all necessary permits and licenses that may be required to carry out exploration, development and mining operations on its properties.

 

The Company is awaiting mineral concession renewals at its Cerro Quema Project. There is no assurance that we will receive necessary approvals or extensions, or receive them within a reasonable period of time. Failure to receive the permits or extensions would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations. Additional details are provided in the Cerro Quema Project section of this document.

 

The timing of our ability to construct a mine at Camino Rojo is subject to, and may be affected by, timely review and approval by the Mexican environmental and permitting authorities.

 

Foreign Country and Political Risk

 

The Company’s principal mineral properties are located in Mexico and Panama. The Company is subject to certain risks, including currency fluctuations, possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mineral titles or other mineral rights, opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations, and mineral exploration and mining activities may be affected in varying degrees by political stability and government regulations relating to the mining industry. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its business. Exploration and development may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on future exploitation and production, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange controls, income taxes, royalties on production, expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine and/or site safety.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Operating in developing economies such as Mexico and Panama has certain risks, including changes to, or invalidation of, government mining regulations; expropriation or revocation of land or property rights; changes in foreign ownership rights; changes in foreign taxation rates; security issues; corruption; uncertain political climate; narco-terrorist actions or activities; and lack of a stable economic climate.

 

We do not carry political risk insurance.

 

Dependence on Exploration-Stage Properties

 

The Company’s current efforts are focused primarily on exploration stage properties. The Camino Rojo and the Cerro Quema Projects may not develop into commercially viable ore bodies, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s potential mineral resource production, profitability, financial performance and results of operations.

 

Estimates of Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves and Production Risks

 

The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates included in this MD&A are estimates based on a number of assumptions, including those stated herein, and any adverse change to those assumptions could require the Company to lower its mineral resource estimate. Until a deposit is actually mined and processed, the quantity and grades of mineral resources must be considered as estimates only. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. In addition, the quantity and/or economic viability of mineral resources may vary depending on, among other things, metal prices, grades, production costs, stripping ratios, recovery rates, permit regulations and other legal requirements, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions. Any material change in the quantity of mineral resources or grade may affect the economic viability of the Company’s properties. No assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of minerals will in fact be realized or that an identified mineral resource will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) deposit that can be legally and economically exploited. There can also be no assurance that any discoveries of new mineral reserves will be made. Any material reductions in estimates of mineral resources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

The Camino Rojo Gold Project mineral resource estimate assumes that the Company can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Company

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by another mining company (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study dated June 25, 2019, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The Feasibility Study was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the Feasibility Study.

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Mineral resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions

 

The estimation of mineral resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

In particular, the estimation of mineral resources for the Camino Rojo Gold Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the mineral resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached.

 

Although all mineralization included in the Company’s mineral resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the mineral resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in mineral resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Mining Industry

 

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the current exploration programs planned by the Company will result in a profitable commercial mining operation.

 

Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on many factors, some of which are the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as metal prices which are highly cyclical and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

 

Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk. The Company’s operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration and development of ore, including unusual and unexpected geology formations, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. The Company’s mineral exploration activities are directed towards the search, evaluation and development of mineral deposits. There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Company as described herein will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of ore. There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the discovery and acquisition of properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company will compete with other interests, many of which with greater financial resources, for the opportunity to participate in promising projects. Significant capital investment is required to achieve commercial production from successful exploration efforts.

 

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Government Regulation

 

The exploration activities of the Company are subject to various federal, provincial and local laws governing prospecting, development, taxes, labour standards, toxic substances and other matters. Exploration activities are also subject to various federal, provincial and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, and land reclamation. These laws also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Although the Company’s exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations governing operations and exploration activities, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations, amendments to current laws and regulations or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Company’s activities.

 

Title Matters

 

Although the Company has diligently investigated title to all mineral concessions (either granted or under re-application) and, to the best of its knowledge (except as otherwise disclosed herein), titles to all its properties are in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to any of the Company’s mineral properties and any of the Company’s properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected encumbrances or defects or governmental actions.

 

Land Title

 

The Company has investigated ownership of all surface rights in which it has an interest, and, to the best of its knowledge, its ownership rights are in good standing. However, all surface rights may be subject to prior claims or agreement transfers, and rights of ownership may be affected by undetected defects. While to the best of the Company's knowledge, titles to all surface rights are in good standing; however, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to the surface rights in which the Company has an interest. The properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and titles may be affected by undetected defects.

 

Environmental Risks and Hazards

 

All phases of the Company’s mineral exploration operations are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulations, laws and permits, if any, will not adversely affect the Company’s operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which the Company holds interests which are unknown to the Company at present, which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties. The Company may become liable for such environmental hazards caused by previous owners and operators of the properties even where it has attempted to contractually limit its liability.

 

Government approvals and permits are currently, and may in the future be, required in connection with the Company’s operations. To the extent such approvals are required and not obtained; the Company may be curtailed or prohibited from proceeding with planned exploration or development of mineral properties.

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

 

Page 24

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Commodity Prices

 

The profitability of mining operations is significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold and other minerals. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of these minerals and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in metal prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The price of gold and other minerals has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future serious price declines could cause commercial production to be impracticable.

 

Uninsured Risks

 

The Company carries insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers adequate. Risks not insured against include environmental pollution or other hazards against which such corporations cannot insure or against which they may elect not to insure.

 

Compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws

 

Orla is subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (1999). In general, these laws prohibit a company and its employees and intermediaries from bribing or making other prohibited payments to foreign officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. The Company’s primary operations are located in jurisdictions which have been perceived as having fairly high levels of corruption. Orla cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future anti- corruption regulatory requirements to which the Company’s operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

 

Failure to comply with the applicable legislation and other similar foreign laws could expose the Company and/or its senior management to civil and/or criminal penalties, other sanctions and remedial measures, legal expenses and reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the applicable anti-corruption legislation by Canadian or foreign authorities could also have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

As a consequence of these legal and regulatory requirements, the Company has instituted policies with regard to business ethics, which have been designed to ensure that Orla and its employees comply with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that such efforts have been and will be completely effective in ensuring the Company’s compliance, and the compliance of its employees, consultants, contractors and other agents, with all applicable anticorruption laws and regulations.

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

Certain directors of the Company also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in natural resource exploration and development. Consequently, there exists the possibility for such directors to be in a position of conflict. Any decision made by such directors involving the Company will be made in accordance with their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with the Company and such other companies. In addition, such directors will declare, and refrain from voting on, any matter in which such directors may have a conflict of interest.

 

Page 25

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Threat of Infectious Diseases or Outbreaks of Viruses

 

Global markets have been adversely impacted by emerging infectious diseases and/or the threat of outbreaks of viruses, other contagions or epidemic diseases, including the novel coronavirus COVID-19, and many industries, including the mining industry have been impacted. This outbreak has led to a widespread crisis that is adversely affecting the economies and financial markets of many countries. If increased levels of volatility continue or in the event of a rapid destabilization of global economic conditions, there may be an adverse effect on commodity prices, demand for metals, availability of equity or credit, investor confidence, and general financial market liquidity, all of which may adversely affect the Company’s business and the market price of the Company’s securities.

 

In addition, there may not be an adequate response to emerging infectious diseases. There are potentially significant economic and social impacts, including labour shortages and shutdowns, delays and disruption in supply chains, social unrest, government or regulatory actions or inactions, including permanent changes in taxation or policies, decreased demand or the inability to sell and deliver concentrates and resulting commodities, declines in the price of commodities, delays in permitting or approvals, governmental disruptions or other unknown but potentially significant impacts.

 

At this time, we cannot accurately predict what impacts there will be or what effects these conditions will have on its business, including due to uncertainties relating to the ultimate geographic spread, the duration of the outbreak, and the length of restrictions or responses that have been or may be imposed by the governments. Any outbreak or threat of an outbreak of a contagious or epidemic disease could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its ability to finance, its business and financial results and the market price of its securities.

 

13. Forward Looking Statements

 

This MD&A contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding (i) planned exploration and development programs and expenditures; (ii) the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (iii) expectations on the potential renewal of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema project; (iv) proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema project and the Camino Rojo project; (v) the potential for the discovery of additional mineral resources; (vi) Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits, required agreements with third parties and regulatory approvals, including but not limited to, the receipt of the Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (“ESIA”) permit related to the Cerro Quema project and other necessary permitting required to implement expected future exploration plans; (vii) community and ejido relations; (viii) requirements for additional land; (ix) availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; (x) results of feasibility studies, including but not limited to mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plans and operations, internal rates of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present values, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; (xi) upside opportunities such as pit wall angles, land agreements, and the development of the sulphide mineral resource, and exploration potential; (xii) the timing and costs for production decisions; (xiii) financing timelines and requirements, including the timing and the amount to be secured relating to the Camino Rojo project loan; (xiv) the Camino Rojo project loan, including meeting all the conditions precendent relating to tranches 2 and 3 of the project loan; (xv) timing for start of engineering work, construction, and receipt of permits; (xvi) changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; (xvii) currency and interest rate fluctuations; (xviii) timing for first gold production; and (xix) the Company's objectives and strategies.

 

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

Page 26

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, (i) the future price of gold; (ii) anticipated costs and the Company’s ability to fund its programs; (iii) the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities; (iv) the Company’s ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements; (v) the timing and results of drilling programs; (vi) the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Company’s mineral properties; (vii) the obtaining of an agreement with the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein) to develop the entire Camino Rojo Gold Project mineral resource estimate; (viii) the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects; (ix) the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, (x) assumptions regarding the ability to meet the conditions precedent regarding drawdown on the the Camino Rojo project loan; (xi) the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; (xii) that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; (xiii) that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; (xiv) that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; (xv) that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties; (xvi) the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner; and (xvii) the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements include, among others: (i) failing to meet certain conditions precedent to draw the reamining portion of the Camino Rojo project loan; (ii) risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, including changes in economic parameters; (iii) risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; (iv) failure to obtain required regulatory and stock exchange approvals with respect to any Offering; (v) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (vi) delays in or failure to obtain an agreement with the Adjacent Owner with respect to the Camino Rojo Gold Project; (vii) health, safety and environmental risks; (viii) success of exploration, development and operations activities; (ix) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (x) delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (xi) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (xii) uncertainty in estimates of production, capital and operation costs and potential for production and cost overruns; (xiii) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (xiv) the fluctuating price of gold; (xv) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xvi) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; (xvii) competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of mineral reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; and (xviii) the Company’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions.

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risks and Uncertainties” in this MD&A for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this MD&A and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. You are urged to read the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which you can view online under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com

 

Page 27

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three months ended March 31, 2020 United States dollars unless otherwise stated

 

14. Abbreviations Used

 

C$ Canadian dollars
AIF Annual Information Form
AISC All in Sustaining Cost
Ag Silver
Au Gold
Canplats Canplats Resources Corporation
Cerro Quema Report
or
2014 PFS
An independent technical report for the Cerro Quema Project entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”) prepared by Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA.  
CIM Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Company Orla Mining Ltd.
CSR Community and Social Responsibility
EPCM Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management
ESIA Estudio de Impacto Ambiental, a Panamanian environmental impact study
g/t Grams per metric tonne
G&A General and administrative costs
GAAP Generally accepted accounting principles, which for the Company are IFRS
Goldcorp Goldcorp Inc., a predecessor company to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, prior to April 18, 2019.
MXN Mexican pesos
Newmont Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, a publicly traded company resulting from the combination of Newmont Mining Corporation and Goldcorp Inc., effective April 18, 2019.
ha Hectares
HGL HydroGeoLogica Inc.
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
IMC Independent Mining Consultants Inc.
IP Induced polarization
IRR Internal rate of return
K tonnes Thousands of metric tonnes
Koz Thousands of troy ounces
KCA Kappes Cassiday and Associates
LOM Life of mine
M&I Measured and indicated
MD&A Management's Discussion and Analysis
MIA Manifiesto de Impacto Ambiental.  In English, an Environmental Impact Statement
NI 43-101 Canadian National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects”
NPV Net present value
Pb Lead
PFS Pre-Feasibility Study
RC Reverse circulation
RGI Resource Geosciences Incorporated
SEDAR The System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval, a filing system operated by the Canadian Securities Administrators, accessible at: www.sedar.com
SEMARNAT

Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.

In English, the Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (Mexico)

t Metric tonne, equal to 1,000 kilograms (approximately 2,205 pounds)
TSX Toronto Stock Exchange
$ United States dollars
Zn Zinc

 

Page 28

 

 

Exhibit 99.18

 

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Jason Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended March 31, 2020.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on January 1, 2020 and ended on March 31, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date:       May 12, 2020

 

/s/ Jason Simpson  

Jason Simpson

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.19

 

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended March 31, 2020.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on January 1, 2020 and ended on March 31, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date:      May 12, 2020

 

/s/ Etienne Morin  

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.20

 

 

 

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING

 

AND

 

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

 

 

WITH RESPECT TO THE

 

ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

TO BE HELD ON MAY 13, 2020

 

Dated as of April 2, 2020

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

NOTICE is hereby given that the annual and special meeting (the “Meeting”) of the holders of common shares (“Shareholders”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”) will be held via live webcast at https://78449.themediaframe.com/dataconf/productusers/ola/mediaframe/37060/indexl.html on the 13th day of May, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. (Vancouver time) for the following purposes:

 

(a) to receive the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation as at and for the financial year ended December 31, 2019, together with the report of the auditor thereon;

 

(b) to elect directors of the Corporation for the ensuing year;

 

(c) to appoint Ernst & Young LLP as auditor of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorize the board of directors to fix the remuneration of the auditor;

 

(d) to consider, and if deemed advisable, to pass an ordinary resolution to approve the adoption of a new restricted share unit plan of the Corporation, as more particularly described in the accompanying management information circular; and

 

(e) to transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

With the rapidly evolving public health crisis resulting from the global spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), to mitigate risks to the health and safety of our communities, Shareholders, employees and other stakeholders, we will hold our annual meeting this year in a virtual only format, which will be conducted via live webcast at the following link:

 

https://78449.themediaframe.com/dataconf/productusers/ola/mediaframe/37060/indexl.html

 

or by calling 1-877-407-6184 (toll free), and instructions will be provided as to how Shareholders entitled to vote at the Meeting may participate and vote at the Meeting.

 

Registered shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders will be able to attend, ask questions and vote at the Meeting online. Non-registered shareholders (being shareholders who beneficially own shares that are registered in the name of an intermediary such as a bank, trust company, securities broker or other nominee, or in the name of a depository of which the intermediary is a participant) who have not duly appointed themselves as proxyholder will be able to attend the Meeting online as guests, but guests will not be able to vote or ask questions at the Meeting.

 

The specific details of the foregoing matters to be put before the Meeting, as well as further information with respect to voting by proxy and detailed instructions about how to participate at the virtual Meeting are set forth in the management information circular which accompanies, and is deemed to form a part of, this Notice of Meeting.

 

Registered shareholders are requested to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed form of proxy either in the addressed envelope enclosed to Computershare Trust Company of Canada, Attn: Proxy Department, 8th Floor, 100 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2Y1, or via fax to 1-866-249-7775 (toll free North America) or 1-416-263-9524 (International). Alternatively, registered shareholders may vote by telephone by calling 1-866-732-8683 (toll free) or by using the internet at www.investorvote.com. In each case, proxies must be received not later than 9:00 a.m. (Vancouver time) on May 11, 2020, or at least 48 hours (excluding Saturdays and holidays), before the time for holding the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

Non-registered shareholders who receive these materials through their broker or other intermediary are requested to follow the instructions for voting provided by their broker or intermediary, which may include the completion and delivery of a voting instruction form. If you are a non-registered shareholder and do not complete and return the materials in accordance with such instructions, you may not be entitled to vote at the Meeting.

 

 

 

A Shareholder who wishes to appoint a person other than the proxyholders identified on the form of proxy or voting instruction form (including a non-registered shareholder who wishes to appoint themselves as proxyholder in order to attend and vote at the Meeting online) must carefully follow the instructions in the management information circular and on their form of proxy or voting instruction form accompanying this Notice of Meeting. These instructions include the additional step of registering such proxyholder with the transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company of Canada, after submitting a form of proxy or voting instruction form. Failure to register will result in the proxyholder not receiving a passcode, which is used for online sign-in, and is required to vote at the Meeting. Without a passcode, such proxyholder will only be able to attend the Meeting online as a guest. Non-registered shareholders located in the United States must also provide Computershare Trust Company of Canada with a duly completed legal proxy if they wish to vote at the meeting or appoint a third party as their proxyholder.

 

The Corporation reserves the right to take any additional precautionary measures in relation to the Meeting in response to further developments in respect of the COVID-19 outbreak that the Corporation considers necessary or advisable including changing the time, date or location of the Meeting. Changes to the Meeting time, date or location and/or means of holding the Meeting may be announced by way of press release. Please monitor the Corporation’s press releases as well as its website at www.orlamining.com for updated information. The Corporation advises you to check its website one week prior to the Meeting date for the most current information. The Corporation does not intend to prepare or mail an amended management information circular in the event of changes to the Meeting format.

 

Please review the accompanying management information circular before voting as it contains important information about the Meeting. If you have any questions about the procedures required to qualify to vote at the Meeting or about obtaining and depositing the required form of proxy, you should contact Computershare Trust Company of Canada by telephone (toll free) at 1-800-564-6253, by fax at 1-866-249-7775 or by e-mail at service@computershare.com.

 

Dated April 2, 2020.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

  “Jason Simpson”
  JASON SIMPSON
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

General 2
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES AND VOTING INSTRUCTIONS 2
Solicitation of Proxies 2
Appointment and Revocation of Proxies 2
Voting of Proxies 3
Non-Registered Holders 3
Voting at the Virtual Meeting 5
Appointment of a Third Party as Proxy 6
Record Date 6
Voting Shares 7
Quorum 7
Principal Shareholders 7
Interest of Certain Persons or Companies in Matters to be Acted Upon 7
Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting 8
Financial Statements 8
Election of Directors 8
Appointment of Auditors 18
Adoption of the 2020 Restricted Share Unit Plan 18
Statement of Corporate Governance 19
Corporate Governance 19
Corporate Policies 26
Statement of Executive Compensation 30
Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis 30
Termination and Change of Control Benefits 43
Director Compensation 44
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under the Equity Compensation Plans 48
Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers 48
Interest of Informed Persons in Material Transactions 49
Other Business 49
Additional Information 49
Approval of Directors 50
Schedule “A” BOARD MANDATE A-1
Schedule “B” EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN SUMMARIES B-1
Schedule “C” 2020 RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT PLAN SUMMARY C-1
Schedule “D” AUDITOR CHANGE REPORTING PACKAGE D-1

 

 

 

 

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

 

General

 

This management information circular (the “Circular”) is furnished in connection with the solicitation by management (“Management”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation” or “Orla”) of proxies to be used at the Corporation’s annual and special meeting of the holders (“Shareholders”) of common shares of the Corporation (the “Common Shares”) to be held on May 13, 2020 (the “Meeting”) or at any adjournment or postponement thereof at the time and place and for the purposes set forth in the accompanying notice of annual and special meeting (“Notice of Meeting”).

 

This year, the Meeting will be held in a virtual only format, which will be conducted via live webcast. Shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders can attend the Meeting online by going to:

 

https://78449.themediaframe.com/dataconf/productusers/ola/mediaframe/37060/indexl.html

 

or by calling 1-877-407-6184 (toll free), and instructions will be provided. Shareholders will not be able to physically attend the Meeting. For a summary of how Shareholders may to attend the Meeting online, see “Voting at the Virtual Meeting” below.

 

The Corporation reserves the right to take any additional precautionary measures in relation to the Meeting in response to further developments in respect of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak that the Corporation considers necessary or advisable including changing the time, date or location of the Meeting. The Corporation will notify Shareholders of any change without sending additional soliciting materials or updating proxy-related materials by:

 

· issuing a news release announcing the change in the date, time or location;

 

· filing the news release on SEDAR; and

 

· informing all the parties involved in the proxy voting infrastructure (such as intermediaries, transfer agents, and proxy service providers) of the change.

 

The Corporation continues to closely monitor developments around the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus and is taking every precaution to ensure the safety of its people and communities and is committed to keeping its Shareholders informed.

 

Except as otherwise indicated, the information contained in this Circular is stated as at April 2, 2020. All dollar amounts referenced herein, unless otherwise indicated, are expressed in Canadian dollars.

 

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES AND VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

 

Solicitation of Proxies

 

It is anticipated that the solicitations will be made primarily by mail in relation to the delivery of the Circular. Proxies may also be solicited personally or by telephone by directors, officers or employees of the Corporation at nominal cost. The cost of the solicitation will be borne by the Corporation. The Corporation has arranged for Intermediaries (as defined below) to forward the meeting materials to Non-Registered Shareholders (as defined below) and the Corporation may reimburse the Intermediaries for their reasonable fees and disbursements in that regard.

 

Appointment and Revocation of Proxies

 

The person(s) designated by Management in the enclosed form of proxy are directors and/or officers of the Corporation (the “Management Proxyholders”). Each Shareholder has the right to appoint as proxyholder a person (who need not be a Shareholder) other than Management Proxyholders to represent the Shareholder at the virtual Meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Such right may be exercised by striking out the names of the person(s) printed in the accompanying form of proxy and inserting the name of the person in the blank space provided in the enclosed form of proxy or by completing another suitable form of proxy and, in either case, delivering the completed and executed form of proxy as provided below.

 

2

 

If you are a Non-Registered Shareholder (as defined below) and wish to vote at the virtual Meeting, you have to insert your own name in the blank space provided on the voting instruction form or form of proxy sent to you by your Intermediary (as defined below), follow the applicable instructions provided by your Intermediary, AND register yourself as your proxyholder, as described below under the heading “Appointment of a Third Party as Proxy”.

 

Registered Shareholders

 

In the case of registered Shareholders (“Registered Shareholders”), the completed, signed and dated form of proxy should be sent in the addressed envelope enclosed to Computershare Trust Company of Canada Attn: Proxy Department, 100 University Avenue, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Yl, or via fax to 1-866-249-7775 (toll free North America) or 1-416-263-9524 (International). Alternatively, Registered Shareholders may vote by telephone by calling 1-866-732-8683 (toll free) or by using the internet at www.investorvote.com. To be effective, a proxy must be received not later than 9:00 a.m. (Vancouver time) on May 11, 2020, or at least 48 hours (excluding Saturdays and holidays), before the time for holding the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

A Registered Shareholder who has given a proxy may revoke it by depositing an instrument in writing, including another proxy bearing a later date, signed by the Shareholder or by the Shareholder’s attorney, who is authorized in writing, or by transmitting, by telephonic or electronic means, a revocation signed by electronic signature by the Shareholder or by the Shareholder’s attorney, who is authorized in writing, to the head office of the Corporation at any time up to and including the last business day preceding the day of the Meeting, or in the case of any adjournment or postponement of the Meeting, the last business day preceding the day of the adjournment or postponement, or with the Chair of the Meeting on the day of, and prior to the start of, the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. A Registered Shareholder may also revoke a proxy in any other manner permitted by law. Only Registered Shareholders have the right to revoke a proxy. A Non-Registered Shareholder who wishes to change its vote must arrange for its Intermediary to revoke its proxy on its behalf.

 

Voting of Proxies

 

On any ballot that may be called for, the Common Shares represented by a properly executed proxy given in favour of the Management Proxyholders will be voted or withheld from voting in accordance with the instructions given on the ballot. If the Shareholder specifies a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, the Common Shares will be voted accordingly.

 

In the absence of any direction in the instrument of proxy, such Common Shares will be voted in favour of the matters set forth in the accompanying Notice of Meeting. The enclosed form of proxy confers discretionary authority upon the persons named therein with respect to amendments or variations to matters identified in the accompanying Notice of Meeting, and with respect to other matters which may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. At the date of this Circular, Management is not aware of any such amendment, variation or other matter to come before the Meeting. However, if any amendments or variations to matters identified in the accompanying Notice of Meeting or any other matters which are not now known to Management should properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the Common Shares represented by properly executed proxies given in favour of the Management Proxyholders will be voted on such matters pursuant to such discretionary authority.

 

3

 

Non-Registered Holders

 

Only Registered Shareholders (or duly appointed proxyholders) are permitted to vote at the Meeting. However, in many cases, Shareholders are “non-registered” Shareholders because the Common Shares they own are not registered in their names, but are instead registered in the name of the brokerage firm, bank or trust company through which they purchased the Common Shares. More particularly, a person is not a Registered Shareholder in respect of Common Shares which are held on behalf of that person (a “Non-Registered Shareholder”), but which are registered either: (a) in the name of an intermediary (an “Intermediary”) that the Non-Registered Shareholder deals with in respect of the Common Shares (Intermediaries include, among others, banks, trust companies, securities dealers or brokers and trustees or administrators of self-administered RRSPs, RRIFs, RESPs and similar plans); or (b) in the name of a clearing agency (such as The Canadian Depository for Securities Limited) of which the Intermediary is a participant. Non-Registered Shareholders do not appear on the list of Shareholders maintained by the transfer agent.

 

Non-Registered Shareholders who have not objected to their Intermediary disclosing certain ownership information about themselves to the Corporation are referred to as Non-Objecting Beneficial Owners (“NOBOs”). Those Non-Registered Shareholders who have objected to their Intermediary disclosing ownership information about themselves to the Corporation are referred to as Objecting Beneficial Owners (“OBOs”).

 

In accordance with the requirements as set out in National Instrument 54-101 – Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer, the Corporation has distributed copies of the Notice of Meeting, this Circular and the form proxy (collectively, the “Meeting Materials”) to Intermediaries for onward distribution to NOBOs and OBOs. The Corporation does not intend to pay for Intermediaries to deliver the Meeting Materials to OBOs. An OBO will therefore not receive the Meeting Materials unless such OBO’s Intermediary assumes the cost of delivery.

 

Intermediaries are required to forward the Meeting Materials to Non-Registered Shareholders unless a Non-Registered Shareholder has waived the right to receive them. Very often, Intermediaries will use service companies to forward the Meeting Materials to Non-Registered Shareholders. Generally, Non-Registered Shareholders who have not waived the right to receive the Meeting Materials will either:

 

(a) be given a form of proxy which has already been signed by the Intermediary (typically by a facsimile, stamped signature), which is restricted as to the number of Common Shares beneficially owned by the Non-Registered Shareholder but which is otherwise not completed. Because the Intermediary has already signed the form of proxy, this form of proxy is not required to be signed by the Non-Registered Shareholder when submitting the proxy. If the Non-Registered Shareholder does not wish to attend and vote at the virtual Meeting in person (or have another person attend and vote on the holder’s behalf), the Non-Registered Shareholder must complete the form of proxy and deposit it with the Corporation’s registrar and transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as provided above; or

 

(b) be given a voting instruction form which is not signed by the Intermediary, and which, when properly completed and signed by the Non-Registered Shareholder and returned to the Intermediary or its service company, will constitute voting instructions (often called a “proxy authorization form”) which the Intermediary must follow. Typically, the proxy authorization form will consist of a one page pre-printed form. Sometimes, instead of the one page pre-printed form, the proxy authorization form will consist of a regular printed proxy form accompanied by a page of instructions, which contains a removable label containing a barcode and other information. In order for the form of proxy to validly constitute a proxy authorization form, the Non-Registered Shareholder must remove the label from the instructions and affix it to the form of proxy, properly complete and sign the form of proxy and return it to the Intermediary or its service company in accordance with the instructions of the Intermediary or its service company. If the Non-Registered Shareholder does not wish to attend and vote at the virtual Meeting in person (or have another person attend and vote on the holder’s behalf), the voting instruction form must be completed, signed and returned in accordance with the directions on the form.

 

4

 

In either case, the purpose of this procedure is to permit a Non-Registered Shareholder to direct the voting of the Common Shares which they beneficially own. Non-Registered Shareholders should carefully follow the instructions of their Intermediary, including those regarding when and where the proxy or proxy authorization form is to be delivered. Only Registered Shareholders have the right to revoke a proxy. A Non-Registered Shareholder who wishes to change its vote must arrange for its Intermediary to revoke its proxy on its behalf.

 

Non-Registered Shareholders who wish to vote at the virtual Meeting must insert their own name in the blank space provided on the voting instruction form or form of proxy, follow the applicable instructions provided by the Intermediary AND register as your proxyholder, as described below under the heading “Appointment of a Third Party as Proxy”.

 

Voting at the Virtual Meeting

 

To proactively deal with the unprecedented public health impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus), the Corporation will hold its Meeting in a virtual only format, which will be conducted via live audio webcast as well as by conference call. The Corporation believes that hosting a virtual meeting will increase participation by its Shareholders, as it will enable Shareholders to more easily attend the Meeting regardless of their geographic location. This year, Shareholders will not be able to physically attend the Meeting.

 

Only Registered Shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders may attend and vote at the virtual Meeting. Registered Shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders who participate at the Meeting online will be able to listen to the Meeting, ask questions and vote, all in real time, provided they are connected to the internet and comply with all of the requirements set out in this Circular. A Registered Shareholder or a Non-Registered Shareholder who has appointed themselves or a third party proxyholder to represent them at the Meeting, will appear on a list of Shareholders prepared by Computershare Trust Company of Canada, the transfer agent and registrar for the Meeting. To have their Common Shares voted at the meeting, each Registered Shareholder or proxyholder will be required to enter their control number or other passcode prior to the start of the Meeting.

 

Non-Registered Shareholders who have not duly appointed themselves as proxyholders may attend the Meeting as guests. Guests will be able to listen to the Meeting online, but will not be able to vote or ask questions at the Meeting. This is because the transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company of Canada, does not have a record of the Non-Registered Shareholders of and, as a result, will have no knowledge of shareholdings or entitlement to vote, unless the Non-Registered Shareholder appoints itself as proxyholder.

 

If you are a Non-Registered Shareholders and wish to vote at the Meeting, you must (i) appoint yourself as proxyholder by inserting your own name in the space provided for appointing a proxyholder on the voting instruction form sent to you and follow all of the applicable instructions, including the deadline, provided by the Intermediary; and (ii) register with Computershare Trust Company of Canada. See “Appointment of a Third Party as Proxy” below for additional information on how Non-Registered Shareholders can appoint themselves as proxyholder.

 

In order to streamline the virtual Meeting process, the Corporation encourages Shareholders to vote in advance of the Meeting using the voting instruction form or the form of proxy mailed to them with the Meeting Materials. Shareholders wishing to attend the virtual Meeting may continue to do so by logging into the webcast at:

 

https://78449.themediaframe.com/dataconf/productusers/ola/mediaframe/37060/indexl.html

 

or by calling 1-877-407-6184 (toll free), and instructions will be provided. If you attend the Meeting online, it is important that you remain connected to the internet for the duration of the Meeting in order to vote when balloting commences. It is your responsibility to ensure that you remain connected. The Meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. (Vancouver time) on May 13, 2020, unless otherwise adjourned or postponed. You should allow ample time for the online check-in procedures prior to the start of the Meeting.

 

5

 

A summary of the information Shareholders will need to attend the online meeting is provided below.

 

· Registered Shareholders must log in prior to the start of the Meeting, and enter the control number located on the form of proxy.

 

· Duly appointed proxyholders will obtain from Computershare Trust Company of Canada a passcode after the proxy voting deadline has passed and the proxyholder has been duly appointed AND registered as described in “Appointment of a Third Party as Proxy” below.

 

· Guests, including Non-Registered Shareholders who have not duly appointed themselves as proxyholder can listen to the Meeting, but will not able to vote or ask questions. Log in online or by conference call, and then complete the registration.

 

If you are using a control number or passcode to login to the online Meeting and you accept the terms and conditions, you will be revoking any and all previously submitted proxies. However, in such a case, you will be provided the opportunity to vote by ballot on the matters put forth at the meeting. If you DO NOT wish to revoke all previously submitted proxies, do not accept the terms and conditions, in which case you can only enter the Meeting as a guest.

 

Appointment of a Third Party as Proxy

 

The following applies to Non-Registered Shareholders who wish to appoint themselves as proxyholder to attend, ask questions and vote at the Meeting.

 

Shareholders who wish to appoint a third party proxyholder to represent them at the Meeting must submit their proxy or voting instruction form (if applicable) prior to registering the proxyholder. Registering the proxyholder is an additional step once the holder has submitted its proxy or voting instruction form. Failure to register the proxyholder will result in the proxyholder not receiving a Username to participate in the meeting. To register a proxyholder, Shareholders MUST visit https://www.computershare.com/OrlaMining by 9:00 a.m. (Vancouver time) on May 11, 2020 and provide Computershare Trust Company of Canada with the proxyholder’s contact information, so that Computershare Trust Company of Canada may provide the proxyholder with a passcode via email. Without a passcode, proxyholders will not be able to vote at the Meeting.

 

United States Non-Registered Shareholders: To attend and vote at the virtual Meeting, holders must first obtain a valid legal proxy from its broker, bank or other agent and then register in advance to attend the Meeting. Follow the instructions from the broker or bank included with Meeting Materials, or contact the broker or bank to request a legal proxy form. After first obtaining a valid legal proxy from the broker, bank or other agent, to then register to attend the Meeting, holders must submit a copy of its legal proxy to Computershare Trust Company of Canada. Requests for registration should be directed to: Computershare, 100 University Avenue 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2Y1 OR Email at uslegalproxy@computershare.com. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 9:00 a.m. (Vancouver time) on May 11, 2020. Holders will receive a confirmation of registration by email. You may attend the Meeting and vote during the virtual Meeting. Please note that such holders are required to register the appointment at www.computershare.com/OrlaMining.

 

Record Date

 

The board of directors of the Corporation (the “Board”) has fixed April 2, 2020 (the “Record Date”) as the record date for the purpose of determining holders of Common Shares entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Meeting. In accordance with the provisions of the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “CBCA”), the Corporation or its transfer agent will prepare a list of holders of Common Shares on the Record Date. Each Shareholder named in the list or such Shareholder’s proxy will be entitled to vote the Common Shares shown opposite such Shareholder’s name on the list at the Meeting.

 

6

 

Voting Shares

 

The authorized voting securities of the Corporation consist of an unlimited number of Common Shares. As at Record Date, the Corporation had 187,725,383 Common Shares outstanding, each carrying the right to one vote. Except as otherwise noted in this Circular, a simple majority of the votes cast at the Meeting, whether in person, by proxy or otherwise, will constitute approval of any matter submitted to a vote.

 

Quorum

 

A quorum will be present at the Meeting if there are at least two persons present in person, each being a Shareholder entitled to vote thereat or a duly appointed proxy or proxyholder for an absent Shareholder so entitled, holding or representing in the aggregate not less than 25% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.

 

Principal Shareholders

 

To the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the Corporation, as at the Record Date, no person beneficially owned, controlled or directed, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the voting rights attached to the outstanding Common Shares except the following:

 

Shareholder   Number of
Common Shares
    % of Outstanding
Common Shares
 
Newmont Corporation     34,410,141 (1)     18.3 %
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited     17,613,835 (2)     9.4 %
Pierre Lassonde     23,013,500 (3)     12.3 %

 

Notes:

 

(1) Held by Goldcorp Inc. (“Goldcorp”), which was acquired by Newmont Corporation (“Newmont”) on April 18, 2019. Newmont also holds warrants to purchase 1,275,000 Common Shares, which upon exercise and together with its Common Shares represents approximately 18.9% of the Common Shares on a partially-diluted basis.
(2) Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”) also holds warrants to purchase 11,270,250 Common Shares, which upon exercise and together with its Common Shares represents approximately 14.5% of the Common Shares on a partially-diluted basis.
(3) Mr. Lassonde also holds warrants to purchase 7,640,000 Common Shares, which upon exercise and together with his Common Shares represents approximately 15.7% of the Common Shares on a partially-diluted basis.

 

Interest of Certain Persons or Companies in
Matters to be Acted Upon

 

Other than as disclosed in this Circular, no: (i) director or executive officer of the Corporation at any time since the beginning of the last completed financial year; (ii) proposed nominee for election as a director; or (iii) any associate of a person in (i) or (ii) has any material interest, direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, in any matter to be acted upon at the Meeting. Directors and executive officers may, however, be interested in the adoption of the Replacement RSU Plan (as defined below) as detailed in “Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Adoption of Replacement Restricted Share Unit Plan”, as such persons are entitled to participate in the Replacement RSU Plan.

 

 

7

 

Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting

 

Financial Statements

 

The audited consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended December 31, 2019 and the report of the auditor thereon will be placed before the shareholders at the Meeting, but no vote thereon is required. These documents are available upon request or they can be found under the Corporation’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or on its website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Election of Directors

 

The Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles”) provide that the Board consist of a minimum of three and a maximum of ten directors. The Board currently consists of eight directors and the term of office of each of the present directors expires at the close of the Meeting. The Board has fixed the size of the Board for election at the Meeting at eight directors. At the Meeting, the eight persons set out below will be proposed for election as directors of the Corporation (the “Nominees”). Each of the Nominees is currently a director. Each director elected will hold office until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders or until such person’s successor is elected or appointed. Management does not contemplate that any of the Nominees will be unable to serve as a director, but if that should occur for any reason prior to the Meeting, it is intended that discretionary authority will be exercised by the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote the proxy for the election of any other person or persons in place of any Nominee or Nominees unable to serve. All Nominees have established their eligibility and willingness to serve as directors.

 

The Board recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the election of each of the Nominees. Unless authority is withheld, the Management Proxyholders intend to vote FOR the election of each of the Nominees.

 

The Corporation has adopted a Majority Voting Policy prepared in accordance with Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) majority voting requirements with respect to the annual election of directors. Pursuant to the Majority Voting Policy, each director must be individually elected by a majority (50%+1) of the votes cast with respect to his/her election, other than at contested meetings. If the votes in favour of the election of a Director at a Shareholder meeting represent less than a majority (i.e. 50% + 1) of the votes cast with respect to his or her election, that Director will immediately tender his or her resignation (“Resignation”) to the Board after the Shareholder meeting. Within ninety days following the applicable meeting, the Board shall conclude its deliberations and make a determination as to whether or not to accept the resignation; however, as mandated in the TSX guidelines, the Board shall accept the resignation absent exceptional circumstances. Following the Board’s determination, the Board will publicly disclose their decision, including, if applicable, the reasons for not accepting the resignation. A director who tenders a resignation pursuant to the Majority Voting Policy shall not be permitted to participate in any meetings of the Board or any sub-committee of the Board at which his/her election as a director is being considered.

 

The following tables set forth information with respect to each Nominee and is based upon information furnished by the respective proposed Nominee. Except as indicated below, each of the proposed Nominees has held the principal occupation shown beside the Nominee’s name in the table below or another executive office with the same or a related company, for the last five years.

 

8

 

CHARLES JEANNES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nevada, USA

Age, 61

Director since June 2017

Independent

 

Principal Occupation

 

Corporate Director

 

Board and Board Committees   2019 Meeting Attendance  
Board of Directors (Chair)     100 %
Compensation Committee     100 %
Audit Committee     100 %
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at April 2, 2020
 
Common Shares     Options     Warrants     DSUs     Ownership
Requirement
 
2,231,100 (1)       977,791       820,000       164,692     Satisfied  

 

Other Board Memberships

 

Pan American Silver Corp. (Director)

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (Director)

 

 

Mr. Jeannes joined the Board in June 2017. Mr. Jeannes served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Goldcorp from 2009 until April 2016, and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development from 2006 until 2008. From 1999 until the acquisition of Glamis Gold Ltd. (“Glamis”) by Goldcorp, he was Executive Vice President, Administration, General Counsel and Secretary of Glamis. Prior to joining Glamis, Mr. Jeannes worked for Placer Dome Inc., most recently as Vice President of Placer Dome North America. From January 2017 to February 2019, Mr. Jeannes served as Director of Tahoe Resources Inc. Following the acquisition of Tahoe Resources Inc. by Pan American Silver Corp., Mr. Jeannes was appointed as a Director of Pan American Silver Corp. He is also a Director of Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (formerly Silver Wheaton Corp.) and serves as a University of Nevada, Reno (“UNR”) Foundation Trustee (a non-profit Board). He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from UNR and graduated from the University of Arizona School of Law with honours in 1983. He practiced law from 1983 until 1994 and has broad experience in capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, public and private financing and international operations.

 

 

Historical Voting Results
Year   For     Withheld  
2019     99.73 %     0.27 %
2018     95.12 %     4.88 %
2017     99.96 %     0.04 %

 

 

 

Note:

(1) In addition, Mr. Jeannes is entitled to 500,000 Bonus Shares (as defined herein). The Bonus Shares will become issuable on the date Mr. Jeannes ceases to act as a director following June 18, 2020. See “Statement of Executive Compensation – Director Compensation”.

 

9

 

 

RICHARD HALL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colorado, USA

Age, 70

Director since June 2015

Independent  

 

Principal Occupation

 

Corporate Director, Geologist and Mineral Industry Consultant

 

Board and Board Committees   2019 Meeting Attendance  
Board of Directors     80 %
Compensation Committee (Chair)     100 %
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee     75 %

 

Securities Holdings as at April 2, 2020

 

Common Shares     Options     Warrants     DSUs     Ownership
Requirement
 
2,257,000       695,743       100,000       94,496       Satisfied  

 

Other Board Memberships

 

IAMGold Corporation (Director)

 

 

Mr. Hall joined the Board in June 2015. Mr. Hall was appointed a director of IAMGOLD Corporation in 2012. Mr. Hall brings over 40 years of exploration, development, mining and corporate experience to the Corporation. Mr. Hall is a former Director of Kaminak Gold Corporation from February 2013 to July 2016. Mr. Hall served as Chairman of Klondex Mines Ltd. from September 2014 until July 2018 when it was acquired by Hecla Mining Company. From 1999 to 2008 he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Metallica Resources Inc., where he was involved in all aspects of the corporation’s development including the financing, construction and commissioning of the Cerro San Pedro gold-silver mine in Mexico. While at Metallica, the El Morro deposit was discovered in Chile and was brought through to a final feasibility study in conjunction with Metallica’s operating partner on the project, Xstrata Copper. In August 2008, Metallica was part of a $1.6 billion merger with Peak Gold Ltd. and New Gold Inc. to form what is now New Gold Inc. Mr. Hall also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Northgate Minerals from July 2011 until October 2011 when Northgate was acquired by AuRico Gold Inc. From 2008 until 2011 he held the position of Chairman of Grayd Resource Corporation, which was acquired by Agnico Eagle in November 2011. Mr. Hall holds a Bachelor and a Masters Degree in Geology and an MBA from Eastern Washington University. He has also completed an Executive Development Program at the University of Minnesota.

 

 

Historical Voting Results
Year     For       Withheld  
2019     99.73 %     0.27 %
2018     95.12 %     4.88 %
2017     99.96 %     0.04 %

 

 

 

10

 

 

JASON SIMPSON

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ontario, Canada

Age, 46

Director since

November 2018

Not independent

 

Principal Occupation

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Corporation

 

Board and Board Committees   2019 Meeting Attendance  
Board of Directors     100 %
Environmental, Sustainability, Heath and Safety Committee     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at April 2, 2020
 
Common Shares   Options     RSUs     Ownership
Requirement
427,359 (1)     1,891,440 (1)     443,473     N/A

 

Other Board Memberships

 

None

 

Mr. Simpson was appointed the Corporation’s President and Chief Executive Officer effective November 12, 2018. In addition to the role of President and CEO, Mr. Simpson also serves as a Director of the Corporation. Mr. Simpson is a mining executive with over 23 years of experience in operations leadership, mining engineering and project construction. Most recently, he was Chief Operating Officer of Torex Gold Resources (“Torex”) where, over his nearly 6-year tenure, he oversaw the successful construction and operation of the ELG Mine in Mexico. Prior to Torex, Mr. Simpson spent 11 years at Vale in various roles of increasing responsibility ending his tenure as General Manager of the Labrador Operations (Voisey’s Bay) in 2013. Mr. Simpson also worked at McIntosh Redpath Engineering on mining studies for companies including Barrick, Freeport McMoran, CVRD, Rio Tinto and Falconbridge, among others, where he gained global multi-commodity experience and perspective. Mr. Simpson holds dual degrees in Mining Engineering from the Technical University of Nova Scotia and in Physics from Dalhousie University.

 

Historical Voting Results
Year   For     Withheld  
2019     99.73 %     0.27 %
2018     N/A       N/A  
2017     N/A       N/A  

 

 

 

Note:

 

(1) In addition, Mr. Simpson is entitled to 1,000,000 CEO Bonus Shares (as defined herein) in four tranches of 250,000 Bonus Shares each. See “Statement of Executive Compensation – Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis”. As of the date of this Circular, the vesting conditions in connection with the first tranche of these Bonus Shares had been achieved; however, the associated Common Shares had not yet been issued.

 

11

 

 

JEAN ROBITAILLE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ontario, Canada

Age, 58

Director since December 2016

Independent

 

Principal Occupation

 

Senior Vice-President of Agnico Eagle since June 2008.

 

Board and Board Committees   2019 Meeting Attendance  
Board of Directors     100 %
Compensation Committee     100 %
Environmental, Sustainability, Heath and Safety Committee     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at April 2, 2020

 

Common Shares     Options     Warrants     DSUs     Ownership
Requirement
1,796,450       536,396       88,000       82,345     Satisfied

 

Other Board Memberships

 

Canada Mining Innovation Council (Director)

 

Mr. Robitaille joined the Board in December 2016, upon closing of the Corporation’s acquisition of Pershimco Resources Inc. Mr. Robitaille is Senior Vice-President, Corporate Development, Business Strategy and Technical Services of Agnico Eagle. Prior to this nomination and since 1988, he served Agnico Eagle in various senior executive roles for Business Strategy, Technical Services, Project Development and Operations. He has also worked at LaRonde as Project Manager, Mill Superintendent and Metallurgist. Prior to joining Agnico Eagle, Mr. Robitaille worked as a metallurgist with Teck Mining Group. Mr. Robitaille currently serves as Director on the board of the Canada Mining Innovation Council (CMIC) a national non-profit organization. Mr. Robitaille is a mining graduate of the College de l’Abitibi Témiscamingue with a specialty in mineral processing.

 

Historical Voting Results  
Year     For     Withheld  
2019     99.99 %     0.01 %
2018     95.12 %     4.88 %
2017     99.96 %     0.04 %

 

 

 

12

 

 

GEORGE ALBINO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colorado, USA

Age, 61

Director since June 2017

Independent

 

Principal Occupation

 

Corporate Director

 

Board and Board Committees   2019 Meeting Attendance  
Board of Directors     100 %
Audit Committee     100 %
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (Chair)     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at April 2, 2020
 
Common Shares     Options     Warrants     DSUs     Ownership
Requirement
401,000       504,819       121,500       89,421     Satisfied

 

Other Board Memberships

 

Eldorado Gold Corporation (Chairman)

 

Dr. Albino joined the Board in June 2017. Dr. Albino, Ph.D., is a geologist and was a Managing Director and Mining Analyst at GMP Securities, L.P., Research Division from 2010 until 2016. Prior to this, he was an Analyst at Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd., Research Division from June 2002 until 2010, focusing on North American precious metal producers and exploration companies as well as base metal, uranium and diamond companies. Dr. Albino has over 35 years of experience in mining and finance, having been a geologist for 18 years and as a highly-ranked sell side analyst covering mining (principally gold) stocks for 19 years. Before joining the financial services side of the business, he worked for 18 years in the mining industry, academia and government as an Exploration and Research Geologist exploring for precious metals, base 17 metals and diamonds. He is also currently the Chairman of the board of directors of Eldorado Gold Corporation (since October 2016). Dr. Albino has a Ph.D. from The University of Western Ontario, an M.S. from the Colorado State University and a B.A.Sc. from Queen’s University.

 

Historical Voting Results  
Year     For     Withheld  
2019     99.73 %     0.27 %
2018     99.96 %     0.04 %
2017     99.94 %     0.06 %

 

 

 

13

 

 

TIM HALDANE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arizona, USA

Age, 63

Director since June 2017

Independent

 

Principal Occupation

 

Mining professional/Corporate Director

 

Board and Board Committees   2019 Meeting Attendance  
Board of Directors     100 %
Environmental, Sustainability, Heath and Safety Committee (Chair)     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at April 2, 2020
 
Common Shares     Options     Warrants     DSUs     Ownership
Requirement
103,500       504,819       14,250       89,421     Satisfied

 

Other Board Memberships
 
None

 

 

Mr. Haldane joined the Board in June 2017. Mr. Haldane is a mining professional with 40 years of operating and project development experience including 15 years in Mexico. Mr. Haldane most recently held the position of Senior Vice President of Operations - USA & Latin America at Agnico Eagle from 2014 until February 2017. Mr. Haldane holds a B.S. in Metallurgical Engineering from Montana Tech and is a Registered Professional Engineer.

 

Historical Voting Results  
Year     For     Withheld  
2019     99.73 %     0.27 %
2018     99.98 %     0.02 %
2017     99.89 %     0.11 %

 

 

 

14

 

 

DAVID STEPHENS (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alberta, Canada

Age, 38

Director since March 2018

Independent

 

Principal Occupation

 

Partner at Agentis Capital Mining Partners, Consultant in mining and technology industries

 

Board and Board Committees   2019 Meeting Attendance  
Board of Directors     100 %
Audit Committee     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at April 2, 2020

 

Common Shares   Options   Warrants   DSUs   Ownership
Requirement
Nil   160,356   65,000   69,468   N/A

 

Other Board Memberships

 

None

 

 

Mr. Stephens is a partner at Agentis Capital Mining Partners which provides capital markets advisory services and is a consultant in the mining and technology industries through his private consulting company. He was the Vice President, Corporate Development and Marketing at Goldcorp until its acquisition by Newmont on April 18, 2019, having previously served as Vice President and Treasurer. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Mr. Stephens spent ten years working in investment banking and equity research at various organizations including Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd. and Orion Securities. Mr. Stephens holds a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Harvard University.

 

Historical Voting Results
Year   For     Withheld  
2019     99.73 %     0.27 %
2018     96.81 %     3.19 %
2017     N/A       N/A  

 

 

 

Note:

(1) Mr. Stephens was formerly the director nominee of Newmont following its acquisition of Goldcorp. See “Investor Rights Agreement” below.

 

15

 

 

ELIZABETH McGREGOR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

British Columbia, Canada

Age, 43

Director since June 2019

Independent

 

Principal Occupation

 

Finance professional, Corporate Director

 

Board and Board Committees   2019 Meeting Attendance (1)  
Board of Directors     100 %
Audit Committee (Chair)     100 %
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at April 2, 2020

 

Common Shares   Options   Warrants   DSUs   Ownership
Requirement
Nil   146,118   65,000   52,682   N/A

 

Other Board Memberships

 

Kinross Gold Corporation (Director)

 

 

Ms. McGregor served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tahoe Resources Inc. from August 9, 2016 until the acquisition by Pan American Silver Corp. on February 22, 2019. Ms. McGregor is a Canadian Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CA) and, prior to her role as Chief Financial Officer, served as Tahoe Resources Inc.’s VP Treasurer. She directed financial planning, corporate liquidity, financial reporting and risk management. Prior to joining Tahoe Resources Inc., she worked at Goldcorp from 2007 to 2013 where she held various financial roles including Director of Project Finance and Cost Control; Administration Manager at the Peñasquito mine; and Director of Risk. Ms. McGregor has also served as a director of Kinross Gold Corporation since November 6, 2019. Ms. McGregor began her career at KPMG as Audit Manager. She holds a B.A. (Hons) from Queen’s University in Kingston.

 

Historical Voting Results
Year   For     Withheld  
2019     99.99 %     0.01 %
2018     N/A       N/A  
2017     N/A       N/A  

 

 

 

Note:

 

(1)       Meeting attendance during 2019 subsequent to appointment.

 

16

 

 

Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanction

 

No director or proposed director of the Corporation is, as at the date of this Circular, or has been, within the 10 years preceding the date of this Circular, a director, chief executive officer and chief financial officer of any company (including the Corporation) that:

 

(a) while that person was acting in that capacity, was the subject of a cease trade, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, in each case that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days (each, an “Order”);

 

(b) was subject to an Order that was issued after the proposed director ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in the capacity as a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer; or

 

(c) while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets.

 

No director or proposed director of the Corporation has, within the 10 years before the date of this Circular, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of such director or proposed director.

 

To the knowledge of the Corporation, as of the date hereof, no proposed director has been subject to: (a) any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority; or (b) any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable security holder in deciding whether to vote for a proposed director.

 

Investor Rights Agreement

 

In accordance with the terms of the investor rights agreement dated November 7, 2017 between Goldcorp (now “Newmont”) and Orla (the “Newmont Agreement”), Newmont has, among other rights, the right to nominate an individual for election to the Board. In the event the number of directors on the Board is increased to more than ten directors, Newmont shall be entitled to designate an additional nominee, provided that at the time of such increase in the size of the Board it holds at least 10% of the Common Shares. Newmont has indicated its intention to exercise its right to nominate a director to the Board but has not done so as of the record date.

 

Under the terms of the Newmont Agreement, Newmont has agreed to vote its Common Shares in accordance with the recommendations of the Board or Management on all matters to be submitted to Shareholders, including for the Management nominee’s for directors, except in the case of voting in respect of: (i) any issuer bid, insider bid, related party transaction or business combination; (ii) any amendment to the constating documents of the Corporation, other immaterial or administrative changes; (iii) any matter in relation to which a recognized proxy advisor is recommending against Management or the Board on any resolution for Shareholders; (iv) any disposition of assets for consideration equal or greater than 50% of the market capitalization immediately prior to the entering into of such transaction; (v) any proposed distribution of securities where the number of Common Shares issued or issuable thereunder is greater than 25% of the Common Shares which are outstanding prior to closing; and (vi) in any circumstances where the Corporation or its directors or officers are not in compliance with the agreement or applicable laws, in which case Newmont is entitled to vote its Common Shares in its discretion (the “Exceptions”). Any nominee of Newmont on the Board will not be required to vote in accordance with the recommendations but will exercise his or her fiduciary responsibilities as a director by voting as he or she sees fit.

 

  17  

 

 

Pursuant to the Newmont Agreement, Newmont has been granted certain participation rights to maintain its pro rata interest in future offerings.

 

Similarly, in accordance with an amended and restated investor rights agreement dated December 17, 2019 between Agnico Eagle (the “Agnico Agreement”) and the Corporation, Agnico Eagle has, among other rights, the right to nominate an individual for election to the Board, provided it holds at least 5% of the Common Shares. Under the terms of the Agnico Agreement, Agnico Eagle has agreed, for a period of 18 months from October 18, 2019, to vote its Common Shares in accordance with the recommendations of the Board or Management on all matters to be submitted to Shareholders, including for the Management nominee’s for directors, except in the case of voting in respect of the Exceptions. Any nominee of Agnico Eagle on the Board will not be required to vote in accordance with the recommendations but will exercise his or her fiduciary responsibilities as a director by voting as he or she sees fit.

 

Pursuant to the Agnico Agreement, Agnico Eagle has been granted certain participation rights to maintain its pro rata interest in future offerings. Agnico Eagle has not exercised its right to nominate a director as of the date of this Circular.

 

Appointment of Auditors

 

On March 25, 2020, Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) was appointed as the auditor of Orla, to replace Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants. Management is recommending the re-appointment of Ernst & Young as auditor for the Corporation, to hold office until the next annual general meeting of the Shareholders at a remuneration to be fixed by the Board. A notice of change of auditor, and confirmation letters from each of the former and successor auditors of the Corporation are attached to this Circular as Schedule “D”, pursuant to the requirements of National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations.

 

To be effective, the resolution to re-appoint Ernst & Young must be approved by not less than a majority of the votes cast by the Shareholders present in person, or represented by proxy, at the Meeting.

 

The Board recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the re-appointment of Ernst & Young. Unless authority is withheld, the Management Proxyholders intend to vote FOR the appointment of Ernst & Young as the auditor of the Corporation to hold office until the next annual general meeting of Shareholders or until a successor is appointed and the Board is authorized to fix their remuneration.

 

Adoption of the 2020 Restricted Share Unit Plan

 

At the Meeting, Shareholders will be asked to consider and, if deemed appropriate, to pass, with or without variation, a resolution in the form set out below (the “RSU Plan Resolution”), subject to such amendments, variation or additions as may be approved at the Meeting, approving the adoption of a new restricted share unit plan (the “Replacement RSU Plan”) as set out below.

 

On April 2, 2020, the Board approved the Replacement RSU Plan, which is intended to replace the existing restricted share unit plan (the “RSU Plan”) as the only restricted share unit plan of the Corporation, subject to Shareholder and stock exchange approvals. All prior grants made under the existing RSU Plan remain subject to the terms of such plan, however, no further grants will be permitted to be made under the existing RSU Plan and such plan will be terminated once the existing grants have vested or been forfeited.

 

For a description of the material terms of the Replacement RSU Plan see Schedule “C”. A copy of the proposed Replacement RSU Plan is attached to this Circular as Exhibit “A” to Schedule “C”.

 

  18  

 

 

The more substantive differences between the Replacement RSU Plan and the existing RSU Plan are as follows:

 

1. the Replacement RSU Plan includes the definition “Deferred Payment Date” which shall mean the date, for a Participant (as defined in the Replacement RSU Plan) under the Replacement RSU Plan, after the Restricted Period (as defined in the Replacement RSU Plan) to which the Participant has elected to defer receipt of the Common Shares;

 

2. the Replacement RSU Plan includes the definition “US Participant” which shall mean a Participant who would be subject to taxation under the Code (as defined in the Replacement RSU Plan) in respect of income derived from the RSUs; and

 

3. Article 3 of the Replacement RSU Plan permits Participants, other than US Participants, to elect to defer the receipt of all or any part of their entitlement to RSUs until a Deferred Payment Date, subject to the terms of the Replacement RSU Plan, upon giving the Corporation written notice of such Deferred Payment Date not later than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period. Participants may change a Deferred Payment Date by providing written notice to the Corporation not later than thirty (30) days prior to the Deferred Payment Date.

 

In order to accommodate the addition of a Deferred Payment Date, the Replacement RSU Plan also contains certain related housekeeping updates, including, among others, the removal of the ability of the Corporation to settle Restricted Share Units in cash. Otherwise, the terms of the Replacement RSU Plan are the same as the terms of the existing RSU Plan.

 

The Board and management recommend the adoption of the RSU Plan Resolution. To be effective, the RSU Plan Resolution must be approved by not less than a majority of the votes cast by Shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting.

 

The text of the RSU Plan Resolution to be submitted to Shareholders at the Meeting is set forth below:

 

“NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

 

1. the restricted share unit plan (the “Replacement RSU Plan”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”), as adopted by the board of directors (the “Board”) and substantially in the form presented to the shareholders (the “Shareholders”) of the Corporation is hereby approved;

 

2. the Board be authorized on behalf of the Corporation to make any further amendments to the Replacement RSU Plan as may be required by regulatory authorities, without further approval of the Shareholders, in order to ensure adoption of the Replacement RSU Plan; and

 

3. the approval of the Replacement RSU Plan by the Board is hereby ratified and confirmed and any one director or officer of the Corporation is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Corporation to execute all documents and to do all such other acts and things as such director or officer may determine to be necessary or advisable to give effect to the foregoing provisions of this resolution.”

 

If, at the Meeting, the Shareholders do not approve the RSU Plan Resolution, the Replacement RSU Plan will not be implemented and the existing RSU Plan will remain in force as the restricted share unit plan of the Corporation. The Board recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the RSU Plan Resolution to approve the adoption of the Replacement RSU Plan. Unless authority is withheld, the Management Proxyholders intend to vote FOR the RSU Plan Resolution.

 

Statement of Corporate Governance

 

Corporate Governance

 

The Corporation and the Board recognize the importance of corporate governance to the effective management of the Corporation and to the protection of its employees and Shareholders. The Corporation’s approach to significant issues of corporate governance is designed with a view to ensuring that the business and affairs of the Corporation are effectively managed so as to enhance Shareholder value.

 

  19  

 

 

In June 2005, National Policy 58-201 – Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) and National Instrument 58-101 – Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (the “Governance Disclosure Rule”) were adopted by the securities regulatory authorities in Canada. The Governance Guidelines deal with matters such as the constitution and independence of corporate boards, their functions, the effectiveness and education of Board members and other items dealing with sound corporate governance practices. The Governance Disclosure Rule requires that, if management of an issuer solicits proxies from its security holders for the purpose of electing directors, specified disclosure of its corporate governance practices must be included in its management information circular. As required by the Governance Disclosure Rule and other applicable regulatory instruments, the following disclosure describes the Corporation’s corporate governance policies and initiatives.

 

The Corporation continually reviews and monitors developments in Canada with a view to further revising its governance policies and practices, as appropriate. Subsequent to the completion of the acquisition of Pershimco Resources Inc. in December 2016 (the “Pershimco Acquisition”), the Camino Rojo gold project in November 2017 and the graduation to the TSX on November 1, 2018, the Corporation’s corporate governance practices and policies were reviewed in order to ensure the Corporation was well situated with best practices in light of its stage of development. This review culminated with the Board adopting various revised and new corporate governance documents and policies. The Board will continue to monitor such practices on an ongoing basis and when necessary implement such additional practices as it deems appropriate.

 

The Board of Directors

 

The Board discharges its responsibility for overseeing the management of the Corporation’s business by delegating to the Corporation’s senior officers the responsibility for day-to-day management of the Corporation. The Board discharges its responsibilities both directly and through its standing committees; namely, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Environmental, Sustainability, Heath and Safety Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. In addition to these regular committees, the Board may appoint ad hoc committees periodically to address issues of a more short-term nature. The Board’s primary roles are overseeing corporate performance and providing quality, depth and continuity of management to meet Orla’s strategic objectives. A copy of the mandate of the Board is attached hereto as Schedule “A”.

 

The Board is responsible for, among other things:

 

· developing, reviewing and approving the business objectives and goals of the Corporation and reviewing the business, financial and strategic plans by which it is proposed that Orla may reach those goals;

 

· approving and monitoring compliance with all significant policies and procedures;

 

· providing input to Management on emerging trends and issues and on strategic plans, objectives and goals that Management develops and monitoring the Corporation’s progress toward its strategic and operational goals, and to revise its direction to Management in light of changing circumstances affecting the Corporation;

 

· reviewing and approving the annual consolidated audited financial statements, the interim consolidated financial statements, and the notes and management’s discussion and analysis accompanying such financial statements, as well as Orla’s management information circular and overseeing the accurate reporting of the financial performance of the Corporation to shareholders, other security holders and regulators on a timely and regular basis;

 

  20  

 

 

· ensuring the implementation of appropriate environmental stewardship and health and safety management systems, which are sufficient within the terms and practices of the mining industry, to ensure compliance with applicable laws; and

 

· identifying the principal risks of the Corporation’s business and ensuring the implementation of appropriate systems to effectively monitor and manage those risks with a view to the long-term viability of the Corporation and achieving a proper balance between the risks incurred and the potential return to Orla’s shareholders.

 

Meetings of the Board

 

The Board fulfills its mandate at regularly scheduled meetings or as required. The directors are kept informed of the Corporation’s operations at these meetings as well as through reports and discussions with Management throughout the year. The frequency of the meetings and the nature of the meeting agendas are dependent upon the nature of the business and affairs which the Corporation faces from time to time. The Board’s practice is that, at the end of each meeting of the Board, independent directors meet in the absence of Management and non-independent directors to hold an open and candid discussion. For the financial year ended December 31, 2019, all Board and committee meetings were accompanied by in-camera sessions where Management was not in attendance.

 

The majority of directors in office constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business and a quorum of directors may exercise all the powers of directors at a meeting. Directors are expected to attend all meetings of the Board and the committees upon which they serve, to come to such meetings fully prepared (including full review of all documentation sent prior to the meeting), and to remain in attendance for the duration of the meeting.

 

In certain circumstances, non-directors will be permitted to attend Board and committee meetings to provide information and opinions to assist the directors in their deliberations. The Board, through the Chair will determine non-director attendees for a meeting, and no non-directors will be permitted to table material at the Board meeting without the prior approval of the Chair (in the case of the Board) or committee chair (in the case of committee of the board).

 

Independence of the Board

 

The Governance Disclosure Rule defines an “independent” director as a director who has no direct or indirect material relationship with the Corporation. A “material relationship” is in turn defined as a relationship which could, in the view of the Board, be reasonably expected to interfere with such member’s independent judgment.

 

The Board is currently comprised of eight directors. The Board has determined that seven out of the eight current members are “independent” directors within the meaning of the Governance Disclosure Rule. Mr. Jason Simpson is not considered “independent” as a result of his role as an executive officer. Messrs. Charles Jeannes, Richard Hall, Jean Robitaille, Tim Haldane, George Albino and David Stephens and Ms. Elizabeth McGregor are each considered to be “independent” directors of the Corporation.

 

If the proposed Nominees put forth by Management are elected at the Meeting, the Board will be comprised of eight directors, seven of whom (Messrs. Jeannes, Hall, Robitaille, Haldane, Albino, Stephens and Ms. McGregor) will be considered “independent” directors and one of whom (Mr. Simpson) will not be considered “independent” for the reasons stated above. To enhance its ability to act independent of Management, the members of the Board may meet in the absence of members of Management and the non-independent directors or may excuse such persons from all or a portion of any meeting where a potential conflict of interest arises or where otherwise appropriate.

 

  21  

 

 

Chair of the Board

 

The current Chair of the Board is Mr. Charles Jeannes. Mr. Jeannes is considered independent. The Chair’s role and responsibilities include providing leadership to the Board, assisting the Board in satisfying its oversight responsibilities, managing Board meetings, promoting the delivery of information to the directors of the Corporation on a timely basis such that directors are fully apprised of all matters which are material to directors, presiding over Shareholder meetings and such other functions as may be ancillary to the duties and responsibilities and as may be delegated to the Chair by the Board from time to time. The Role Statement for Non-Executive Chair is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

The Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation is responsible for managing the business and affairs of the Corporation within the corporate policies and mandates and authority limitations established by the Board from time to time. The Role Statement for the Chief Executive Officer is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Other Reporting Issuer Directorships

 

The following table sets forth the directors of the Corporation who currently hold directorships in other reporting issuers:

 

Name Name of Reporting Issuer Exchange Term
George Albino Eldorado Gold Corp. TSX, NYSE 2016 to Present
Richard Hall IAMGold Corporation TSX, NYSE 2012 to Present
Charles Jeannes Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. TSX, NYSE 2016 to Present
  Pan American Silver Corp. TSX, NASDAQ 2019 to Present
Elizabeth McGregor Kinross Gold Corporation TSX, NYSE 2019 to Present

 

Orientation and Continuing Education

 

Given the size and stage of the Corporation, the Board as a whole is responsible for ensuring that new directors are provided with an orientation program, which includes written information about the business, documents from recent Board meetings and governance policies.

 

In addition, directors are encouraged to visit and meet with Management on a regular basis and are provided the opportunity to independently consult with legal counsel to the Corporation to understand their legal obligations as directors.

 

The Corporation also encourages continuing education of its directors and officers where appropriate in order to ensure that they have the necessary skills and knowledge to meet their respective obligations to the Corporation. To facilitate ongoing education, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will: (a) periodically canvass the directors to determine their training and education needs and interests; (b) arrange for directors to visit the Corporation’s development sites; (c) encourage directors to attend seminars, industry conferences such as the Denver Gold Forum and the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) conference, and other professional development events; (d) encourage and facilitate presentations by outside experts to the Board of committees on matters of particular importance or emerging significance.

 

At each quarterly Board meeting, the Chief Financial Officer makes a presentation to the Board to provide a comprehensive overview of the Corporation’s financial performance, anticipated future financial results and market trends. In addition, together with legal counsel to the Corporation, the Chair of the Board continually reviews the latest securities rules and policies and best practices in corporate governance. Any changes or new requirements will then be brought to the attention of the Corporation’s directors. Board members are encouraged to communicate with Management, auditors, legal counsel and technical consultants; to keep themselves current with industry trends and developments and changes in legislation with Management’s assistance; and to attend related industry seminars and visit the Corporation’s projects. Board members have full access to the Corporation’s records.

 

  22  

 

 

Ethical Business Conduct

 

The Board expects Management to operate the business of the Corporation in a manner that enhances shareholder value and is consistent with the highest level of integrity. Management is expected to execute the Corporation’s business plan and to meet performance goals and objectives according to the highest ethical standards. To this end, the Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) for its directors, officers and employees.

 

Employees are required to report any violations under the Code or the Corporation’s corporate governance policies in accordance with the Corporation’s Whistleblower Policy, which provides that an individual may report any concerns or complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, audit-related matters or fraud to the Chair of the Audit Committee. Such concerns and/or complaints will be kept confidential and may be communicated anonymously if desired. Following the receipt of any complaints, the Chair of the Audit Committee shall promptly investigate each matter so reported.

 

A copy of the Code and the Whistleblower Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com and has also been filed on SEDAR and may be accessed under the Corporation’s profile at www.sedar.com.

 

The Board monitors compliance with the Code and Management provides an annual report to the Board regarding issues, if any, arising under the Code and the Corporation’s corporate governance policies.

 

In addition, as some of the directors of the Corporation also serve as directors and officers of other companies engaged in similar activities, the Board must comply with the conflict of interest provisions of the CBCA, as well as the relevant securities regulatory instruments, in order to ensure that directors exercise independent judgment in considering transactions and agreements in respect of which a director or officer has a material interest. Each director is required to declare the nature and extent of his interest and is not entitled to vote at meetings which involve such conflict.

 

Compensation Committee

 

The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of three independent directors, being Messrs. Hall (Chair), Robitaille and Jeannes. The Compensation Committee has adopted a written mandate and is responsible for the review and approval of the philosophy and design of the Corporation’s compensation programs and the compensation of the Corporation’s executives and members of the Board and for submitting recommendations to the Board in this regard. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board, as appropriate, in connection with the Corporation’s succession planning with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executive officers and ensuring that the structure, design and application of the Corporation’s material compensation programs meet the Corporation’s principles, objectives and risk profile and do not encourage excessive risk taking.

 

See “Statement of Executive Compensation – Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below for details regarding the Corporation’s objectives and philosophy regarding executive compensation and the application of this philosophy to the Corporation’s executive compensation arrangements. During the financial year ended December 31, 2019, the Compensation Committee met three times.

 

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

 

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is currently comprised of four independent directors, being Messrs. Albino (Chair), Jeannes and Hall and Ms. McGregor.

 

  23  

 

 

The Corporation’s Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee is in place to provide a focus on governance that will enhance the Corporation’s performance, to assess and make recommendations regarding the Board’s effectiveness and to establish and lead the process for identifying, recruiting, appointing, re-appointing, evaluating and providing ongoing development for directors. The full text of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s charter is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com. During the financial year ended December 31, 2019, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met four times.

 

Audit Committee

 

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of four independent directors, being Ms. McGregor (Chair) and Messrs. Stephens, Jeannes and Albino, each of whom is considered to be (i) independent; and (ii) financially literate. The Audit Committee is responsible for the Corporation’s financial reporting process and the quality of its financial reporting.

 

The Audit Committee is charged with the mandate of providing independent review and oversight of the Corporation’s financial reporting process, the system of internal control and management of financial risks, and the audit process, including the selection, oversight and compensation of the Corporation’s external auditors. The Audit Committee also assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities in reviewing the Corporation’s process for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and its own code of business conduct. In performing its duties, the Audit Committee maintains effective working relationships with the Board, Management, and the external auditors and monitors the independence of those auditors. The full text of the Audit Committee’s charter is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com. During the financial year ended December 31, 2019, the Audit Committee met four times.

 

The following table describes the education and experience of each current Audit Committee member that is relevant to the performance of his responsibilities as an Audit Committee member:

 

Elizabeth McGregor:

 

Ms. McGregor served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tahoe Resources Inc. from August 9, 2016 until the acquisition by Pan American Silver Corp. on February 22, 2019. Ms. McGregor is a Canadian Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CA) and, prior to her role as Chief Financial Officer, served as Tahoe Resources Inc.’s VP Treasurer. She directed financial planning, corporate liquidity, financial reporting and risk management. Prior to joining Tahoe Resources Inc., she worked at Goldcorp from 2007 to 2013 where she held various financial roles including Director of Project Finance and Cost Control; Administration Manager at the Peñasquito mine; and Director of Risk. Ms. McGregor has also served as a director of Kinross Gold Corporation since November 6, 2019. Ms. McGregor began her career at KPMG as Audit Manager. She holds a B.A. (Hons) from Queen’s University in Kingston.

 

David Stephens:

 

Mr. Stephens is a partner at Agentis Capital Mining Partners which provides capital markets advisory services and is a consultant in the mining and technology industries through his private consulting company. He was the Vice President, Corporate Development and Marketing at Goldcorp until its acquisition by Newmont on April 18, 2019, having previously served as Vice President and Treasurer. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Mr. Stephens spent ten years working in investment banking and equity research at various organizations including Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd. and Orion Securities. Mr. Stephens holds a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Harvard University.

 

  24  

 

 

Charles Jeannes:

 

Mr. Jeannes served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Goldcorp from 2009 until April 2016, and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development from 2006 until 2008. From 1999 until the acquisition of Glamis by Goldcorp, he was Executive Vice President, Administration, General Counsel and Secretary of Glamis. Prior to joining Glamis, Mr. Jeannes worked for Placer Dome Inc., most recently as Vice President of Placer Dome North America. From January 2017 to February 2019, Mr. Jeannes served as Director of Tahoe Resources Inc. He is currently a Director of Pan American Silver Corp. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (formerly Silver Wheaton Corp.) and serves as a UNR Foundation Trustee (a non-profit Board). He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from UNR and graduated from the University of Arizona School of Law with honours in 1983. He practiced law from 1983 until 1994 and has broad experience in capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, public and private financing and international operations.

 

George Albino:

 

Dr. Albino, Ph.D. is a geologist and was a Managing Director and Mining Analyst at GMP Securities, L.P., Research Division from 2010 until 2016. Prior to this, he was an Analyst at Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd., Research Division from June 2002 until 2010, focusing on North American precious metal producers and exploration companies as well as base metal, uranium and diamond companies. Dr. Albino has over 35 years of experience in mining and finance, having been a geologist for 18 years and as a highly-ranked sell side analyst covering mining (principally gold) stocks for 19 years. Before joining the financial services side of the business, he worked for 18 years in the mining industry, academia and government as an Exploration and Research Geologist exploring for precious metals, base metals and diamonds. He is also currently a Director of Eldorado Gold Corporation. Dr. Albino has a Ph.D. from The University of Western Ontario, an M.S. from the Colorado State University and a B.A.Sc. from Queen’s University.

 

The following table sets out the external auditor service fees paid in the 2019 and 2018 financial years:

 

    2019     2018  
Audit Fees(1)   $ 90,000     $ 92,500  
Audit-Related Fees(2)   $ 20,500     $ 31,000  
Tax Fees(3)   $ 22,350     $ 12,500  
All Other Fees(4)     Nil       Nil  
Total:   $ 132,850     $ 136,000  

 

Notes:

 

(1) Fees billed by the Corporation’s auditor for audit services.

(2) Fees billed by the Corporation’s external auditor for assurance-related services that are not included in “audit fees”. Such fees consist primarily of quarterly reviews and work related to providing consents pursuant to financings.

(3) Fees for professional services rendered by the Corporation’s external auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

(4) Fees for products and services provided by the Corporation’s external auditor, other than services reported under the table headings “Audit Fees”, “Audit-Related Fees” or “Tax Fees”.

 

As part of its duties, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all non-audit services performed by the independent auditors in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditors’ independence. In considering the appointment of the auditor for non-audit services, the Audit Committee will consider the compatibility of the service with the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee does not delegate to Management its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditors.

 

Environmental, Sustainability, Health and Safety Committee

 

The Environmental, Sustainability, Heath and Safety Committee is currently comprised of three directors, being Messrs. Haldane (Chair) and Robitaille, each of whom is considered to be independent, and Mr. Simpson, who is not considered to be independent. The purpose of the Environmental, Sustainability, Heath and Safety Committee is to monitor and review the health, safety, environmental and sustainable development policies, principles, practices and processes of the Corporation and monitor and review the regulatory issues related to health, safety, the environment and sustainable development. The Environmental, Sustainability, Heath and Safety Committee has the authority to engage independent counsel or other experts and conduct any investigation that it considers appropriate. It is responsible for amongst other things, reviewing and approving annual disclosure relating to the Corporation’s sustainability, health, safety and environment policies and activities, reviewing sustainability, environmental and health and safety reports and identifying the principal health, safety and environmental risks and impacts of the Corporation.

 

  25  

 

 

During the financial year ended December 31, 2019, the Environmental, Sustainability, Heath and Safety Committee met four times.

 

Assessment of Board Performance

 

Led by the independent Chair, the Board as a whole is expected to evaluate the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and individual directors on an annual basis. The Board has adopted a questionnaire that asks the directors to assess the effectiveness of the Board and its committees in respect of: structure and composition; roles and responsibilities; operations; effectiveness; committee meetings’ operations and effectiveness; and individual director performance. The Board evaluation process was designed to provide directors with an opportunity each year to examine how the Board is operating and to make suggestions for improvement. The Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for ensuring the questionnaire covers all necessary topics of discussion and for gathering the feedback from other directors or the Corporation.

 

Director Term Limits and Other Mechanisms of Board Renewal

 

The Corporation has not adopted term limits for the directors on the Board or other mechanisms of Board renewal at this time. Term limits are not considered necessary, as the Board believes it has adopted sufficient practices and mechanisms for renewal. In particular, the Board has appointed a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee comprised solely of independent directors to provide a focus on governance that will enhance the Corporation’s performance; to assess and make recommendations regarding the Board’s effectiveness; and to establish and lead the process for identifying, recruiting, appointing, re-appointing and providing ongoing development for directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will complete annual reviews of the Board’s relationship with Management to ensure the Board is able to, and in fact does, function independently of Management. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will also develop, and annually update and recommend to the Board for approval, a long term plan for Board composition that takes into consideration, among other matters, the current strengths, skills and experience represented by each director, as they affect Board dynamics as well as retirement dates. The Board believes that the perspective of longer service directors with industry experience is of benefit to the Board. In addition, Management believes that the experience and diversity of the current Board would be very difficult to replicate and that regular evaluation of Board skills and experience, rather than arbitrary term limits, will result in better Board performance.

 

Corporate Policies

 

Environmental & Sustainability, Health & Safety Policy

 

The Corporation is committed to meeting or surpassing regulatory requirements in all of its exploration and development activities while working to protect the environment both within and beyond the Corporation’s operational boundaries. In keeping with this commitment, Orla has adopted an Environmental, Sustainability and Health & Safety Policy. The Corporation will conduct all of its operations in a manner that ensures full compliance with its Environmental, Sustainability and Health & Safety Policy, applicable legislation and government requirements. The aim of this policy is to protect the surroundings in which the Corporation operates, to minimize and manage environmental risk and to enhance sustainable environmental practices. Orla will ensure that all of its activities are conducted in an environmentally safe and responsible manner and will ensure that its contractors adhere to the same high environmental standards. The full text of the Environment & Sustainability, Health & Safety Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

  26  

 

 

Corporate Social Responsibility Policy

 

The Corporation is committed to conducting its business in a responsible manner at all times. In keeping with this commitment, Orla has implemented a Corporate Social Responsibility Policy which sets out the guidelines by which the Corporation will (i) endeavour to respect the health and safety of its employees, (ii) protect the environment, (iii) respect the human rights of its employees and the residents in the communities in which the Corporation operates and (iv) contribute to the sustainable development of those communities.

 

Share Ownership Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted a Share Ownership Policy in order to align the interests of the officers and directors of the Corporation with those of the Corporation’s Shareholders by requiring such persons to own a significant number of Common Shares. Each of the non-executive directors is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least three times the value of the annual base retainer. Each of the executive officers is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least two times his or her base salary. The ownership guidelines will be deemed to be satisfied following the date on which the price paid by the director or officer for Common Shares or the fair market value of the Common Shares equals or exceeds the ownership threshold. Individuals are required to comply with this policy by the fifth anniversary of the date of the individual’s date of hire or appointment. The full text of the Share Ownership Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Name   Number of
Common Shares
    Market Value of
Common
Shares(1)
    Share Ownership
Requirement(2)
    Requirement
Met?
 
Officers
Jason Simpson
President and Chief Executive Officer
    427,359     $ 906,001     $ 900,000       Yes  
Etienne Morin
Chief Financial Officer
    133,170     $ 282,320     $ 500,000       N/A (3)
Non-Executive Directors                                
George Albino
Director
    401,000     $ 850,120     $ 75,000       Yes  
Tim Haldane
Director
    103,500     $ 219,420     $ 75,000       Yes  
Richard Hall
Director
    2,257,000     $ 4,784,840     $ 75,000       Yes  
Charles Jeannes
Director
    2,231,100     $ 4,729,932     $ 150,000       Yes  
Elizabeth McGregor
Director
    Nil       Nil     $ 75,000       N/A (3)
Jean Robitaille
Director
    1,796,450     $ 3,808,474     $ 75,000       Yes  
David Stephens
Director
    Nil (4)     Nil     $ 75,000 (4)     N/A (3)

 

Notes:

 

(1) Calculated using $2.12, being the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on April 2, 2020.

 

  27  

 

 

(2) Each of the non-executive directors is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least three times the value of the annual base retainer. Each of the executive officers is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least two times his or her base salary.
(3) Mr. Simpson, Mr. Morin and Mr. Stephens joined the Corporation in 2018 and Ms. McGregor was appointed as a director of the Corporation in 2019 and accordingly each have five years from their respective dates of hire/appointment to satisfy the requirement.

 

Majority Voting Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted a Majority Voting Policy prepared in accordance with TSX majority voting requirements with respect to the annual election of directors. The full text of the Majority Voting Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com. See “Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon – Election of Directors” for a summary of the Majority Voting Policy.

 

Corporate Disclosure Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted a Corporate Disclosure Policy to outline the required process for the timely disclosure of all material information relating to the Corporation’s business, including both written and verbal disclosure, and to provide guidance and assistance to the Board, officers and employees in complying with their obligations under the provisions of securities laws and stock exchange rules to preserve the confidentiality of the Corporation’s non-public material information. The full text of the Corporate Disclosure Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Insider Trading Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted an Insider Trading Policy. Canadian securities laws and regulations prohibit “insider trading” and impose restrictions on trading securities while in possession of material undisclosed information. The rules and procedures detailed in the Corporation’s Insider Trading Policy have been implemented in order to prevent improper trading of the Corporation’s securities or of companies with which the Corporation may have a business relationship. The full text of the Insider Trading Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

For a summary of the Corporation’s Whistleblower Policy see “Corporate Governance – Ethical Business Conduct” above.

 

Clawback Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted a Clawback Policy in order to maintain a culture of focused, diligent and responsible management which discourages conduct detrimental to the growth of the Corporation and to ensure that incentive-based compensation paid by the Corporation is based upon accurate financial data. The Clawback Policy applies in the event of a material restatement of the Corporation’s financial results as a result of material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements. The full text of the Clawback Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Anti-Hedging Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted a formal Anti-Hedging Policy, the objective of which is to prohibit those subject to it from directly or indirectly engaging in hedging against future declines in the market value of any securities of the Corporation through the purchase of financial instruments designed to offset such risk. The Board believes that it is inappropriate for directors, officers or employees of the Corporation or its respective subsidiary entities or, to the extent practicable, any other person (or their associates) in a special relationship with the Corporation, to hedge or monetize transactions to lock in the value of holdings in the securities of the Corporation. Such transactions, while allowing the holder to own the Corporation’s securities without the full risks and rewards of ownership, potentially separate the holder’s interests from those of other stakeholders and, particularly in the case of equity securities, from the public shareholders of the Corporation. The full text of the Anti-Hedging Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

  28  

 

 

Diversity Policy

 

The Corporation is committed to creating and maintaining a culture of workplace diversity. In keeping with this commitment, the Corporation has established a Diversity Policy. “Diversity” is any dimension which can be used to differentiate groups and people from one another and it means the respect for and appreciation of the differences in gender, age, ethnic origin, religion, education, sexual orientation, political belief or disability, amongst other things. The Corporation recognizes the benefits arising from employee and Board diversity, including a broader pool of high quality employees, improving employee retention, accessing different perspectives and ideas and benefiting from all available talent. The Corporation respects and values the perspectives, experiences, cultures and differences that employees possess. The full text of the Diversity Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

In accordance with the Diversity Policy, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will strive for inclusion of diverse groups, knowledge and viewpoints on the Board and in executive officer positions. In conjunction with its consideration of the qualifications and experience of potential directors and executive officers, as well as the skills, expertise, experience and independence which the Board requires to be effective, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the level of diversity (including the representation of (i) women, (ii) Indigenous peoples, (iii) persons with disabilities or (iv) members of visible minorities (collectively, “members of designated groups”)) on the Board when identifying and nominating candidates for election or re-election to the Board, and will consider the level of diversity (including the representation of members of designated groups) in executive officer positions when the Board makes executive officer appointments. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will be responsible for recommending qualified persons for Board nominations and in doing so, it will consider the benefits of all aspects of diversity on the Board and develop recruitment protocols that seek to include diverse candidates, including proactively searching for diverse candidates in the recruitment process.

 

Policies Regarding the Representation of Members of Designated Groups on the Board

 

As noted above, the Corporation has established a Diversity Policy, which sets out guidelines by which the Corporation will endeavour to promote, foster and support diversity, such as gender diversity, throughout the Corporation, including at the Board level, and applies to executive and non-executive directors, full-time, part-time and casual employees, contractors, consultants and advisors of Orla. Along with the adoption of the Diversity Policy, the Board also adopted guidelines by which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is to consider the diversity of the Board in its recommendations to the Board of nominees for election to the Board and long term plan for Board composition. The Board will proactively monitor Company performance in meeting the standards outlined in the Diversity Policy. This will include an annual review of any diversity initiatives established by Management and the Board, and progress in achieving them. All directors and senior executive officers are required to acknowledge that they have read the Diversity Policy annually.

 

Consideration of the Representation of Members of Designated Groups in the Director Identification and Selection Process

 

Pursuant to the Diversity Policy, the Board will consider diversity, such as members of designated groups, in the selection criteria of new Board members. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will follow its charter and consider the diversity of the Board in its recommendations to the Board of nominees for election to the Board and long term plan for Board composition. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will also consider the following with respect to recommending nominees for election to the Board:

 

· competencies and skills each nominee will bring to the Board;

 

· past business experience;

 

  29  

 

 

· integrity;

 

· industry knowledge;

 

· ability to contribute to the success of the Corporation;

 

· past experience of directors or Management with potential candidates;

 

· expected contribution to achieving an overall Board which can function as a high performance team with sound judgment and proven leadership;

 

· whether the nominee can devote sufficient time and resources to his or her duties as a Board member; and

 

· any other factors as may be considered appropriate.

 

Consideration Given to the Representation of Members of Designated Groups in Executive Officer Appointments

 

Pursuant to the Diversity Policy, the Board will consider diversity, such as members of designated groups, in the selection criteria of new senior executive officer appointments. Management is responsible for recruiting and fostering a diverse and inclusive culture. Management will promote a work environment that values and utilizes the contributions of women and men and of members of designated groups equally, with a variety of backgrounds, experiences and perspectives through awareness of the benefits of workforce diversity and successful management of diversity.

 

Targets and Number of Members of Designated Groups on the Board and in Executive Officer Positions

 

The Corporation has not established targets regarding the representation of members of designated groups on the Board or executive officer positions at this time. The Corporation believes that specific targets would be arbitrary and continues to favour recruitment and promotion based on abilities and contributions in accordance with the Diversity Policy.

 

There is currently one woman on the Board (13%) and no women in executive officer positions at the Corporation. There is one director on the Board (13%) who is a member of the Indigenous peoples.

 

Statement of Executive Compensation

 

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

In accordance with the requirements of applicable securities legislation in Canada, the following executive compensation disclosure is provided in respect of each person who served as the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer during the financial year ended December 31, 2019 and each of the three other most highly compensated executive officers of the Corporation for the financial year ended December 31, 2019, whose annual aggregate compensation exceeded $150,000 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

 

The Named Executive Officers for the financial year ended December 31, 2019 were:

 

·     Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer;

 

·     Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer; and

 

·     Hans Smit, Former Chief Operating Officer.

 

During the financial year ended December 31, 2019, there were no other executive officers or individuals acting in a similar capacity for the Corporation whose compensation was, individually, more than $150,000.

 

  30  

 

 

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Circular sets out the Corporation’s objectives and philosophy regarding executive compensation and the application of this philosophy to the Corporation’s executive compensation arrangements. It also provides an analysis of the Corporation’s compensation design, and the decisions the Compensation Committee made in the financial year ended December 31, 2019, with respect to the Named Executive Officers.

 

Compensation Governance

 

When determining the compensation arrangements for the Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee considers the following objectives:

 

· retaining an executive critical to the success of the Corporation and the enhancement of Shareholder value;

 

· providing fair and competitive compensation;

 

· balancing the interests of Management and Shareholders;

 

· rewarding performance, both on an individual basis and with respect to the business in general; and

 

· ensuring recognition of the fact that the Corporation carries on business with a small number of executive officers relative to other public companies of similar size.

 

For the financial year ended December 31, 2019, the Board and the Compensation Committee considered many factors when considering, reviewing and making recommendations for compensation arrangements for the Named Executive Officers. In determining the compensation level for each executive, the Compensation Committee looked at a variety of factors such as certain corporate and individual objectives, the relative complexity of the executive’s role within the organization, the executive’s performance and potential for future advancement, as well as the compensation paid by a group of comparable companies, as further discussed under “Benchmarking” below.

 

The Compensation Committee

 

The Compensation Committee is comprised of three independent directors, being Messrs. Hall (Chair), Jeannes and Robitaille. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Compensation Committee held three committee meetings on an as needed basis. The primary goal of these meetings as they related to compensation matters was to ensure that the compensation provided to the Named Executive Officers was determined with regard to the Corporation’s business strategies and objectives, such that the financial interest of the executive officers were aligned with the financial interest of Shareholders, and to ensure that their compensation was fair and reasonable and sufficient to attract and retain qualified and experienced executives. The Compensation Committee has adopted a written mandate that governs its practices. See “Role of the Compensation Committee and the Board” below and “Statement of Corporate Governance – Corporate Governance – Compensation Committee”.

 

The Board looks to the past experience of each director in determining the composition of the Compensation Committee and strives to include a range of skills and experiences when making appointments to ensure the Compensation Committee is comprised of directors that act independently and think analytically about the Corporation’s compensation practices. As a whole, each of the members of the Compensation Committee have direct experience and skills relevant to their responsibilities in executive compensation, including with respect to enabling such directors in making informed decisions on the suitability of the Corporation’s compensation policies and practices. Each of these directors have experience on the board of directors and related committees of other public companies, as described under “Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Election of Directors.”

 

  31  

 

 

Recommendations of Management

 

For the financial year ended December 31, 2019, the Compensation Committee consulted with the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Former Chief Operating Officer regarding the Corporation’s annual business goals, objectives and achievements. In addition, the Compensation Committee consulted with the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Former Chief Operating Officer regarding executive officer target short-term incentive awards and actual payouts, and long-term incentive grants, which the Compensation Committee then considered and recommended to the Board, as appropriate. Neither the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer nor the Former Chief Operating Officer made any recommendations with respect to his own compensation package, which was determined by the Compensation Committee directly for recommendation to the Board.

 

The Compensation Committee can exercise its discretion in modifying any of the consultations with or recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer prior to making its recommendations to the Board.

 

Role of the Compensation Committee and the Board

 

The Compensation Committee assists the Board in monitoring the Corporation’s guidelines and practices with respect to compensation and benefits and ensures that the Corporation’s compensation program is competitive and fair. With respect to compensation, the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

 

· reviewing and submitting to the Board recommendations concerning executive compensation and compensation plan matters;

 

· providing periodic reports to the Board on compensation matters that review and assess the design and competitiveness of the Corporation’s compensation and benefits programs generally, while considering the implications of any risks associated with the Corporation’s compensation policies and practices; and

 

· reviewing and making recommendations, in consultation with the Chair of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer, to the Board with respect to implementing or varying share option, share purchase, compensation and other incentive plans.

 

In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews and recommends compensation policies and processes, and any new incentive compensation and equity compensation plans or changes to such plans. The Board makes final decisions on overall executive compensation after receiving advice and recommendations from the Compensation Committee.

 

For the financial year ended December 31, 2019, the Compensation Committee considered consultations with the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and considered and made recommendations to the Board for all executive compensation matters for 2019. The Board considered and granted final approval for executive compensation decisions, with decisions regarding the Chief Executive Officer being made by the non-executive directors of the Board (being all Board members other than the Chief Executive Officer).

 

Independent Compensation Consultant

 

In the financial years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, neither the Board nor the Compensation Committee retained a compensation consultant or advisor to assist the Board, the Compensation Committee in determining the compensation for any of the Corporation’s executive officers’ or directors’ compensation.

 

  32  

 

 

Benchmarking

 

For compensation relating to the financial year ended December 31, 2019, the Compensation Committee has selected a peer group for assessing compensation practices, which group has been approved by the Board. The selection of companies that make up the comparable group are intended to reflect a group of companies with which the Corporation competes for executive officers. The group was selected by identifying entities (i) with market capitalization ranging between $125 million and $1.1 billion, (ii) that are listed on the TSX or the TSX Venture Exchange, and (iii) with projects at a similar stage of development as the Corporation and in similar geographies. The 2019 comparator group includes:

 

Continental Gold Inc. Pure Gold Mining Inc.
Atlantic Gold Corporation Sabina Gold & Silver Corp.
Victoria Gold Corp. Nevada Copper Corp.
Premier Gold Mines Ltd. Corvus Gold Inc.
Harte Gold Corp.  


The Compensation Committee reviewed market data for the peer group to determine to confirm the appropriate level of base salaries, bonuses, long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) and total compensation for the Named Executive Officers. However, the Corporation did not engage in formal benchmarking and the Corporation did not position executive pay to reflect a single percentile within the peer group for each executive. While these general market comparisons represent useful guidelines, discretion may be used in setting individual executive pay so that it appropriately reflects the value and contributions of each executive, as well as the executive’s leadership, commitment to the Corporation’s values and potential for advancement.

 

Risks Associated with the Corporation’s Compensation Policies and Practices

 

The Compensation Committee and the Board have not formally assessed the implications of the risks associated with the Corporation’s compensation policies and practices. However, the Corporation does not believe that its compensation program for the financial year ended December 31, 2019 encouraged excessive or inappropriate risk taking as the Corporation’s employees received both fixed (salary) and variable compensation (discretionary bonus, RSUs and options) designed to balance the level of risk-taking while focusing on generating long-term value.

 

Policy on Purchase of Financial Instruments

 

The Board has adopted a policy that prohibits the purchase by Named Executive Officers or directors of financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of equity securities granted as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by the Named Executive Officer or director. See “Statement of Corporate Governance – Corporate Policies – Anti-Hedging Policy”.

 

  33  

 

 

 

 

Elements of Named Executive Officer Compensation

 

The compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers in any year may consist of three primary components:

 

Element of Compensation Purpose of Element
Base Salary Base salaries are fixed and therefore provide a level of certainty for Named Executive Officers. They are also used to ensure the Corporation’s compensation programs remain competitive in the industry and to determine other compensation elements and benefits.
Short-term Incentive The objective of the short-term incentive plan is to reward Named Executive Officers for the achievement of annual corporate and individual goals.
Long-term Incentive The purpose of the Corporation’s LTIP is to attract, retain and award Named Executive Officers who are expected to significantly contribute to the success of the Corporation, incentivize them to perform at a high level and reward the achievement of creating long-term shareholder value.

 

The Corporation believes that making a significant portion of the Named Executive Officers’ compensation both variable and long-term supports the Corporation’s executive compensation philosophy, as these forms of compensation primarily depend on performance. At the same time, the Corporation emphasizes equity-based compensation to allow those most accountable for the Corporation’s long-term success to acquire and hold Common Shares. The key features of the three primary components of compensation are described below.

 

Base Salary

 

Base salary recognizes the value of an individual to the Corporation based on his or her role, skill, performance, contributions, leadership and potential. It is critical in attracting and retaining executive talent in the markets in which the Corporation competes for talent. Base salaries for the Named Executive Officers are reviewed annually. Any change in base salary of a Named Executive Officer will generally be determined by an assessment of such executive’s performance, a consideration of competitive compensation levels in companies similar to the Corporation (in particular, the peer group members described above) and a review of the performance of the Corporation as a whole and the role the executive officer played in such corporate performance.

 

Base salaries for the financial year ended December 31, 2019 were as follows:

 

Name and Position   Annual Base
Salary
 
Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer   $ 450,000  
Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer   $ 250,000  
Hans Smit, Former Chief Operating Officer   $     250,000 (1)

 

Notes:
   
(1) Hans Smit served as Chief Operating Officer until December 31, 2019.

 

On March 19, 2020, the Board approved an increase in the annual base salary of both the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer to $463,500 and $270,000 respectively for the financial year ending December 31, 2020.

 

34

 

 

Short-term Incentive Plan

 

Pursuant to the respective executive employment agreements, each of Mr. Simpson and Mr. Morin is entitled to a target short-term incentive as a percentage of base salary as set out in the table below. Mr. Smit was similarly entitled to a target short-term incentive as a percentage of base salary during his term of employment.

 

For the financial year ended December 31, 2019, short-term incentive awards were determined and awarded based on an assessment by the Compensation Committee of certain corporate and personal achievements. Each component may then have one or more objective and subjective goals with different weighting and measures.

 

The following is the short-term incentive award target as a percentage of base salary and the split between the corporate and personal components:

 

Position   Targeted
Short-Term
Incentive
(% of Base
Salary)
    Corporate
Objectives
    Individual
Performance
 
Chief Executive Officer     100 %     60 %     40 %
Chief Operating Officer     50 %     50 %     50 %
Chief Financial Officer     50 %     60 %     40 %

 

For the financial year ended December 31, 2019, the following corporate objectives were developed by the Chair of the Compensation Committee based on discussions with each of the executive officers. These corporate objectives were adopted and recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board:

2019 Corporate Objectives   Weight     Score  
Relative Share Price Performance vs Peer Group     10 %     10 %
Completion of the Feasibility Study on Camino Rojo by mid-year     20 %     20 %
Secure lay-back agreement on neighboring property     20 %     16 %
Complete financing for Construction of Camino Rojo by year end     20 %     20 %
Obtain Concession renewals at Cerro Quema by year end     20 %     16 %
Health & Safety; Environment; Community Affairs     10 %     10 %
 Lost Time Injury Rate <2.0 per 1,000,000 hours worked; no fatality                
 No category 3, 4 or 5 (serious through catastrophic) incidents as defined by EPA                
 Develop an effective and sustainable community program                
Total     100 %     92 %

 

Performance against the corporate objectives was assessed by the Compensation Committee at the end of the 2019 financial year based on its review of the achievement of the objective and subjective criteria noted above. It was determined that management had either executed on or substantially advanced successfully each of the corporate objectives during the course of the year. Some of the objectives relied on certain components that were out of management control and it was determined that management had successfully taken the necessary steps to achieve these objectives.

 

35

 

 

Together with the Chair of the Compensation Committee, each executive also developed personal component objectives for 2019 that reflected strategic annual operational advancements, financial system implementation and improvements, development of internal teams and overall focus of leadership and communication of the executive team. For each executive, share price performance relative to the peer group was also assessed. The personal objectives were adopted and recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board.

 

Achievement of the personal objectives was based on an assessment by the Compensation Committee at the end of the 2019 financial year, including through consultations with Management on an as-needed basis. It was determined that most, but not all, of the personal objectives had been met and the Board weighted each objective according to its rate of success to determine the awards.

 

On the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, as approved by the Board, short-term incentives awarded for the financial year ended December 31, 2019 were determined and awarded as follows:

 

Name and Position  

Targeted Award

(% of Base
Salary)

    Overall
Weighted Score
    Award     Actual Award
(% of Base
Salary)
 
Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer     100 %     85 %   $ 401,400       89.2 %
Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer     50 %     100 %   $ 119,000       47.6 %
Hans Smit, Former Chief Operating Officer     50 %     96 %   $ 117,500       47.0 %

 

Long-term Incentive Plan

 

The Corporation’s LTIP is an element of compensation that allows the Corporation to incentivize and retain its Named Executive Officers for their sustained contributions to the Corporation. These awards reward performance and continued employment by a Named Executive Officer, with associated benefits to Orla of attracting, motivating and retaining employees. The Corporation believes that a LTIP provides Named Executive Officers with a strong link to long-term corporate performance and the creation of shareholder value and the LTIP bonus payment is at the discretion of the Board. The LTIP aligns the interests of the Named Executive Officers with those of Shareholders by linking a significant portion of the executive’s total pay opportunity to share price performance, therefore providing long-term accountability.

 

The Compensation Committee adopted a target LTIP grant based on a percentage of base salary for each executive, and allocated among stock options and RSUs (as defined below) as follows:

 

36

 

 

 

Position   Targeted LTIP
(% of Base
Salary)
    Stock Options     RSUs  
Chief Executive Officer     150 %     40 %     60 %
Chief Operating Officer     100 %     40 %     60 %
Chief Financial Officer     100 %     40 %     60 %

 

On the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, as approved by the Board, stock option and RSU grants for the financial year ended December 31, 2019 were determined and awarded as follows:

 

Name and Position   Stock Options
Awarded
    Value of Stock
Options
Awarded (1)
    RSUs
Awarded (2)
    Value of RSUs
Awarded
(2)
 
Jason Simpson
President and Chief Executive Officer
    573,248     $ 270,000       382,075     $ 405,000  
Etienne Morin
Chief Financial Officer
    212,314     $ 100,000       141,509     $ 150,000  
Hans Smit
Former Chief Operating Officer
    212,314     $ 100,000       141,509     $ 150,000  

 

Notes:

 

(1) The grant date fair value of stock options is calculated using the Black-Scholes methodology. These options are exercisable at a price of $1.06 until March 29, 2024. The key assumptions used under the Black-Scholes model that were used for the share option awards in the table above were: risk-free interest rate – 1.45%; expected life – 5 years; expected annualized volatility – 50%; expected dividend rate – nil. The Corporation chose to use the Black-Scholes model as the basis for calculating fair value of the options granted as this methodology is commonly accepted by issuers. The values presented are consistent with the accounting values used in the Corporation’s audited financial statements.
(2) The RSU’s awarded reflect the annual grant in 2019. The values were calculated using the market value at grant date being $1.06, consistent with the approach used in the Corporation’s audited financial statements.

 

10% Rolling Stock Option Plan

 

The Corporation’s existing 10% rolling stock option plan (the “Stock Option Plan”) was implemented to provide effective incentives to senior officers, directors, employees (including management company employees) or consultants of the Corporation or its subsidiaries (the “Eligible Persons”) and to enable the Corporation to attract, retain and motivate experienced and qualified individuals in those positions by providing such individuals with the opportunity to acquire, through Common Share options, an increased proprietary interest in the Corporation. As at April 2, 2020, there were 10,860,774 options outstanding under the Stock Option Plan, representing 5.8% of the outstanding Common Shares and 5,729,150 options remain available for grant (after taking into account the outstanding RSUs and DSUs (as defined below)), representing 3.1% of the outstanding Common Shares.

 

The total number of options which may be granted to any one person under the Stock Option Plan within any 12 month period, together with all other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation (which, for the purposes of this section excludes the 500,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”), shall not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares. In addition, the maximum number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance under options granted to insiders (as a group) under the Stock Option Plan, together with any other of the Corporation’s previously established and outstanding stock option plans or grants, shall be 10% of the Common Shares. Accordingly, a maximum of 5,729,150 options remain available for grant to insiders (representing 3.1% of the outstanding Common Shares).

 

37

 

 

The following table sets out the burn rate of stock options for the three most recently completed financial years:

 

Year   Stock Options
Granted
    Weighted
Average Number
of Common
Shares
Outstanding
    Burn Rate(1)  
2019     2,199,322       182,619,000       1.2 %
2018     3,841,505       176,748,000       2.2 %
2017     4,365,000       131,550,000       3.3 %

 

Notes:

 

(1) The “burn rate” is defined as the number of stock options granted in a fiscal year divided by the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding in that year. The weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding is the number of Common Shares outstanding at the beginning of the period, adjusted by the number of Common Shares bought back or issued during the period multiplied by a time-weighting factor. Time-weighting factor is the number of days that the Common Shares are outstanding as a proportion of the total number of days in the period.

 

For a description of the material terms of the Stock Option Plan, see Schedule “B”.

 

Restricted Share Unit Plan

 

The Corporation’s existing RSU Plan was implemented to provide for a wide range of incentive plans to attract, retain and encourage eligible employees, directors and consultants of the Corporation due to the opportunity offered to them to acquire a proprietary interest in the Corporation and to secure for the Corporation and Shareholders the benefits inherent in the ownership of Common Shares by such persons. The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares available for issuance under the RSU Plan shall not exceed 3,000,000 Common Shares (being 1.6% of the outstanding Common Shares). As at April 2, 2020, there are 1,052,205 RSUs outstanding under the RSU Plan, representing 0.6% of the outstanding Common Shares, and 1,461,914 RSUs remain available for grant, representing 0.8% of the outstanding Common Shares.

 

The maximum number of RSUs available for grant to any one person, in a 12 month period, pursuant to the RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation (which, for the purposes of this section excludes the 500,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”), is 5% of the total number of Common Shares. In addition, the maximum number of Common Shares which may be issuable at any time to insiders (as a group) pursuant to the RSU Plan, or together with any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum value of RSUs which may be granted to each director who is not also an eligible employee, together with all other security based compensation arrangements, shall not exceed $150,000 (based on the closing trading price of the Common Shares on the grant date of an RSU in any financial year). Accordingly, a maximum of 1,461,914 RSUs remain available for grant to insiders (representing 0.8% of the outstanding Common Shares). The following table sets out the burn rate of RSUs since adoption of the RSU Plan:

 

Year   RSUs Granted     Weighted
Average Number
of Common
Shares
Outstanding
    Burn Rate  
2019     849,639       182,619,000       0.5 %
2018     368,000       176,748,000       0.2 %
2017     N/A       N/A       N/A  

 

For a description of the material terms of the RSU Plan, see Schedule “B”.

 

38

 

 

Benefit Plans

 

As of January 1, 2019, the Corporation provides a group benefit plan to the employees of the Corporation in which the Named Executive Officers participate. The terms of the group benefit plan are customary. The Corporation does not provide any post-retirement benefits to any of the Named Executive Officers or employees of the Corporation.

 

Pension Plans

 

The Named Executive Officers do not participate in any defined benefit pension plan, defined contribution plan or deferred compensation plan.

 

Performance Graph

 

The following table and graph compares the cumulative total Shareholder return for $100 invested in Common Shares of the Corporation from June 30, 2015, the date of the Corporation’s name change and new Board, to December 31, 2019 against the cumulative shareholder return of each of the S&P/TSX Composite Index and the S&P/TSX Composite Gold Index for the same period.

 

    June 2015     December 2015     December 2016     December 2017     December 2018     December 2019  
Orla Mining Ltd.     100.00       87.50       781.25       1,112.50       656.25       1,250.00  
S&P/TSX Composite Index     100.00       90.86       110.01       120.02       109.35       132.06  
S&P/TSX Global Gold Index     100.00       87.01       128.55       125.98       117.94       170.70  

 

 

 

On June 10, 2015, at the annual and special shareholders meeting, the shareholders of the Corporation approved the name change from Red Mile Minerals Corp. to “Orla Mining Ltd.” and unanimously voted in favor of the proposed Director nominees. This name change and election of the Board of Directors marked the start of the Corporation as it exists today. Since that time, the Corporation has undergone two significant acquisitions, being (i) the acquisition of Pershimco Resources Inc. and the Cerro Quema project Los Santos Province, Panama in December 2016, and (ii) the acquisition of the Camino Rojo project in Zacatecas State, Mexico in November 2017. During 2018, the Corporation achieved a number of additional milestones, including entering into agreements to acquire certain interests in Nevada, completion of a $30 million bought deal offering, the appointments of Jason Simpson as Chief Executive Officer and Etienne Morin as Chief Financial Officer, and the results of a position preliminary economic assessment on the Camino Rojo project. In addition, on November 1, 2018, the Common Shares commenced trading on the TSX and were delisted from trading on the TSX Venture Exchange. In June 2019, Orla released the results of a feasibility study on its Camino Rojo gold project. In December 2019, Orla entered into a project finance facility with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation and a syndicate of lenders for US$125 million. Concurrent to the announcement of the facility, Orla received the Change of Land Use permit, one of the two key permits for the construction of the Camino Rojo project.

 

39

 

 

During the periods indicated, the total return to shareholders has generally outperformed both the S&P/TSX Composite Index and the S&P/TSX Global Gold Index. Over the same period, Orla saw a significant increase in the scope and complexity of its operations as it completed the various acquisitions and transitioned to a more advanced development company. Consequently, aggregate total compensation awarded to the current Named Executive Officers has increased significantly since 2015. The Compensation Committee considers that the increase in compensation over the period is appropriate given the increase in scope and complexity of the Corporation’s operations and the achievements made during this time.

 

The Compensation Committee remains committed to ensuring that its executive compensation program is aligned with Shareholder values and rewards performance. Equity-based compensation represents a significant portion of each Named Executive Officer’s total compensation, and is considered to be performance-based, at-risk compensation. Accordingly, its value will naturally fluctuate along with any fluctuations in the market performance of the Common Shares.

 

The Compensation Committee believes that the Corporation’s short- and long-term programs continue to align executive pay with the performance objectives required to create and maintain Shareholder value.

 

40

 

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table summarizes the compensation paid to or earned by the Named Executive Officers during the financial years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.

 

                                      Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (4)
               
Name and Principal Position of
Named Executive Officer
    Year (1)       Salary
($)
      Share-based
awards (2)
($)
      Option-based
awards (3)

($)
      Annual Incentive
Plans ($)
    Long-Term
Incentive Plans
($)
  Pension Value
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
    Total
Compensation
($)
 
Jason Simpson     2019     $ 450,000     $ 405,000     $ 270,000     $ 401,400     Nil   Nil   Nil   $ 1,526,400  
President and Chief Executive Officer (5)     2018     $ 61,250     $  537,000 (6)    $ 595,300     $ 56,250     Nil   Nil   Nil   $ 1,249,800  
      2017       Nil       Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil   Nil   Nil     Nil  
Etienne Morin     2019     $ 250,000     $ 150,000     $ 100,000     $ 119,000     Nil   Nil   Nil   $ 619,000  
Chief Financial Officer (7)     2018     $ 150,000     $ 135,000     $ 429,937     $ 110,700     Nil   Nil   Nil   $ 825,637  
      2017       Nil       Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil   Nil   Nil     Nil  
Hans Smit     2019     $ 250,000     $ 150,000     $ 100,000     $ 117,500     Nil   Nil   375,000 (9) $ 617,500  
Former Chief Operating Officer (8)     2018     $ 250,000     $ 150,000     $ 99,841     $ 125,000     Nil   Nil   Nil   $ 624,841  
      2017     $ 250,000       Nil     $ 366,327     $ 125,000     Nil   Nil   Nil   $ 741,327  

 

Notes:

 

(1) Financial years ended December 31.
(2) Reflects value of RSUs granted and in the case of Mr. Simpson for 2018 compensation, also includes the value of the CEO Bonus Shares, as detailed in footnote 6 below.
(3) The fair value of stock options was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The assumptions used for the grants in 2019 are presented on page 42.
(4) The figures presented are for amounts earned in respect of the year, paid in the subsequent year.
(5) Mr. Simpson was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation on November 12, 2018. Mr. Simpson is also a director of the Corporation and does not receive any additional compensation for that role.
(6) The Board approved a one-time award of 1,000,000 Common Shares (the “CEO Bonus Shares”) on November 12, 2018 to Mr. Simpson in consideration for Mr. Simpson acting as President and Chief Executive Officer and director of the Corporation. The CEO Bonus Shares have staged vesting restrictions based upon the Corporation’s achievement of certain 30-day volume weighted average trading price levels on the TSX, at which times a specified portion of the CEO Bonus Shares will become issuable to Mr. Simpson, unless the CEO Bonus Shares sooner vest upon a change of control as defined in the award agreement. These CEO Bonus shares have a grant date fair value estimated at $537,000 which value is consistent with the approach used in the Corporation’s audited financial statements.
(7) Mr. Morin was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation on April 30, 2018.
(8) Mr. Smit served as Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation from June 10, 2015 to December 31, 2019. Mr. Smit was also a director of the Corporation and did not receive any additional compensation for that role.
(9) Amounts paid to Mr. Smit pursuant to his separation agreement.

 

41

 

 

 

Named Executive Officers – Outstanding Option-Based Awards

 

The table below reflects the incentive plan awards outstanding as at December 31, 2019.

 

      Option-Based Awards     Share-Based Awards  
Name and Principal
Occupation
    Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
 (1)
  (#)
      Option
Exercise Price

($)
    Option Expiry
Date
    Value of
Unexercised
In- the-Money
Options
 (2)
  ($)
    Number of Shares
or Units That Have
Not Vested
 
(#)  
  Market or Payout
Value of Share-
Based Awards
That Have Not
Vested

  ($)  
  Market or Payout
Value of Vested
Share-Based
Awards not Paid
Out or Distributed

  ($)  
    Number of
Unvested
RSUs
(3)  
(#)  
      Market Value
of Unvested
RSUs
(5)
  ($)  
 
Jason Simpson     1,000,000      $ 1.30     Nov 13, 2023   $ 700,000      1,000,000 (4) 2,000,000 (5) Nil     382,075        764,150   
President and Chief Executive Officer     573,248      $ 1.06     Mar 29, 2024   $ 538,853                               
Etienne Morin     600,000      $ 1.25     May 31, 2023   $ 450,000      Nil   N/A   N/A     213,509        427,018   
Chief Financial Officer     159,292      $ 1.25     Jun 27, 2023   $ 119,469                               
      212,314      $ 1.06     Mar 29, 2024   $ 199,575                               
Hans Smit     225,000      $ 0.15     Nov 27, 2020   $ 416,250      Nil   N/A   N/A     221,509        443,018   
Former Chief Operating Officer     600,000      $ 1.39     Jun 23, 2022   $ 366,000                               
      176,991      $ 1.25     Jun 27, 2023   $ 132,743                               
      212,314      $ 1.06     Mar 29, 2024   $ 199,575                               

 

Notes:

 

(1) Each option entitles the holder to purchase one Common Share.
(2) Calculated using the closing market price of the Common Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2019 of $2.00 and subtracting the exercise price of in-the-money stock options. These stock options have not been, and may never be, exercised and actual gains, if any, on exercise will depend on the value of the Common Shares on the date of exercise.
(3) These RSUs vest as to one third each on the first, second, and third anniversary dates of award.
(4) The Board approved a one-time award of 1,000,000 CEO Bonus Shares on November 12, 2018 to Mr. Simpson in consideration for Mr. Simpson acting as President and Chief Executive Officer and director of the Corporation. The CEO Bonus Shares have staged vesting restrictions in four traches of 250,000 each based upon the Corporation’s achievement of certain 30-day volume weighted average trading price levels on the TSX, at which times a specified portion of the CEO Bonus Shares will become issuable to Mr. Simpson, unless the CEO Bonus Shares sooner vest upon a change of control as defined in the award agreement.
(5) Calculated using the closing market price of the Common Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2019 of $2.00.

 

42

 

 

Named Executive Officers – Incentive Award Plan – Value Vested or Earned During the Year

 

The following table provides information concerning the value vested or earned under incentive award plans of the Corporation with respect to each Named Executive Officer during the financial year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Name and Principal Position of Named Executive Officer  

Option-Based
Awards – Value
Vested During
the Year
(1)

($)

   

Share-Based
Awards – Value
Vested During
the Year (2)

($)

   

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation -
Value Earned
During the
Year (3)

($)

 
Jason Simpson
President and Chief Executive Officer
  $ 50,000       Nil     $ 401,400  
Etienne Morin
Chief Financial Officer
    Nil     $ 38,520     $ 119,000  
Hans Smit
Former Chief Operating Officer
    Nil     $ 42,800     $ 117,500  

 

Notes:

 

(1) “Value vested during the year” means the aggregate dollar value that would have been realized if the options under the option-based award had been exercised on the vesting date. This amount is calculated using the closing market prices of the Common Shares on the TSX on the dates on which stock options vested during the year, and subtracting the exercise price of in-the-money stock options.
(2) “Value vested during the year” means the aggregate dollar value of the Common Shares that are issued on the vesting of the RSUs. This amount is calculated using the closing market price of the Common Shares on the dates on which the restricted periods of the RSUs expired during the year ended December 31, 2019.
(3) Reflects the annual bonus paid to each Named Executive Officer. These amounts were paid in 2020 in respect of 2019 performance.

 

Termination and Change of Control Benefits

 

Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

The employment agreement dated October 14, 2018, between the Corporation and Mr. Simpson provides that if the Corporation terminates Mr. Simpson’s employment without cause or in the event Mr. Simpson terminates for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Simpson will be entitled to an amount equal to 12 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned through that 12 month period based on the average annual bonus in the three years immediately preceding termination. In addition, any unvested stock options shall immediately vest upon notification of termination. If there is a change of control (as defined in the employment agreement), and within 12 months of such change of control, there is a termination by the Corporation without cause or termination by Mr. Simpson for good reason, Mr. Simpson will be entitled to an amount equal to 24 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned though that 24 month period.

 

43

 

 

 

Mr. Simpson’s agreement contains non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions.

 

Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer

 

The employment agreement dated March 13, 2018, between the Corporation and Mr. Morin provides that if the Corporation terminates Mr. Morin’s employment without cause or in the event Mr. Morin terminates for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Morin will be entitled to an amount equal to 12 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned through that 12 month period based on the average annual bonus in the three years immediately preceding termination. If there is a change of control (as defined in the employment agreement), and within 12 months of such change of control, there is a termination by the Corporation without cause or termination by Mr. Morin for good reason, Mr. Morin will be entitled to an amount equal to 24 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned though that 24 month period.

 

Mr. Morin’s agreement contains non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions.

 

Hans Smit, former Chief Operating Officer

 

The employment agreement dated December 1, 2016, as amended March 23, 2018, between the Corporation and Mr. Smit was terminated in accordance with a separation agreement on December 31, 2019. The agreement provided that if the Corporation terminated Mr. Smit’s employment without cause or in the event Mr. Smit was terminated for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Smit would be entitled to an amount equal to 12 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned through that 12 month period based on the average annual bonus in the three years immediately preceding termination. Severance of $375,000 was paid to Mr. Smit pursuant to the terms of a separation agreement. Stock options and RSUs held by Mr. Smit at December 31, 2019, continue to vest according to their original schedules.

 

Mr. Smit’s agreement contained non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions, which continued under the terms of such agreement following his separation.

 

Estimated Incremental Payments on Termination or Change of Control

 

Pursuant to the applicable employment agreements, if a severance payment triggering event had occurred on December 31, 2019, the severance payments that would be payable to each of Messrs. Simpson and Morin would have been as follows:

 

Name and Position   Termination without Cause
or Resignation
for Good
Reason
($)
    Termination
without Cause
or Resignation
for Good Reason +
Change of Control
($)
 
Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer   $ 900,000     $ 1,800,000  
Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer   $ 375,000     $ 750,000  
Total:   $ 1,275,000     $ 2,550,000  

 

Mr. Smit ceased to act as the Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation during 2019. The amount paid in connection with his severance is reflected in the summary compensation table.

 

Director Compensation

 

The objective of the Corporation’s compensation program for directors is to attract and retain members of the Board of a quality and nature that will enhance the sustainable profitability and growth of the Corporation. Director compensation is intended to provide an appropriate level of remuneration considering the experience, responsibilities, time requirements and accountability of their roles.

 

In addition, in order to appropriately align the interests of members of the Board with those of Shareholders, the Board has implemented a director share ownership policy. See “Statement of Corporate Governance – Corporate Governance Policies – Share Ownership Policy.”

 

Upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board has approved a compensation package for directors as follows:

 

(i) an annual retainer for each non-executive director (other than the Chair) of $25,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $6,250) for acting as directors of the Corporation;

 

44

 

 

(ii) an annual retainer for the Chair of $50,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $12,500) for acting as Chair of the Board;

 

(iii) an additional annual retainer for the Chair of the Audit Committee of $10,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $2,500) for acting as the Chair of such committee;

 

(iv) an additional annual retainer for the Chair of the Compensation Committee of $10,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $2,500) for acting as the Chair of such committee;

 

(v) an additional annual retainer for the Chair of the Environmental, Sustainability, Health and Safety Committee of $5,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $1,250) for acting as the Chair of such committee; and

 

(vi) an additional annual retainer for the Chair of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee of $5,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $1,250) for acting as the Chair of such committee.

 

Share-based awards and option-based awards are determined based on a factor representing 300% of the Director’s fees earned during the year and are allocated equally between stock options and DSUs.

 

The following table sets out certain information respecting the compensation paid to directors of the Corporation who were not Named Executive Officers during the financial year ended December 31, 2019:

 

Director’s Name   Fees
earned ($)
    Share-based
awards ($)(1)
    Option-based
awards ($)(1) (2)
    Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation ($)
  Pension
value ($)
    All other
compensation
($)
  Total ($)  
George Albino   $ 30,000     $ 45,000     $ 45,000     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 120,000  
Tim Haldane   $ 30,000     $ 45,000     $ 45,000     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 120,000  
Richard Hall   $ 33,750     $ 52,000     $ 52,500     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 138,250  
Charles Jeannes   $ 50,000     $ 75,000     $ 75,000     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 200,000  
Elizabeth McGregor (3)   $ 16,250     $ 59,000     $ 69,276     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 144,526  
Jean Robitaille   $ 25,000     $ 37,000     $ 37,500     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 99,500  
David Stephens   $ 26,250     $ 53,000     $ 48,143     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 127,393  

 

Notes:

 

(1) Share-based awards and option-based awards are determined based on a factor representing 300% of the Director’s fees earned during the year and are allocated equally between stock options and DSUs.
(2) The fair value of stock options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculation: risk-free interest rate – 1.45%; expected life – 5 years; expected annualized volatility – 50%; expected dividend rate – nil. The Corporation selected the Black-Scholes model given its prevalence of use within North America. This is consistent with the methodology used by the Corporation in its audited financial statements.
(3) Ms. Elizabeth McGregor was appointed to the Board in June 2019, and the above table reflects amounts paid or awarded subsequent to her appointment.

 

45

 

 

Directors – Option-Based and Share-Based Awards

 

The table below reflects the incentive plan awards outstanding as at December 31, 2019.

 

Name   Option-Based Awards   Share-Based Awards
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

  (#)  
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiry
Date
  Value of
Unexercised
In- the-
Money
Options (1)
  ($)  
  Number of
Shares or
Units That
Have Not
Vested
  (#) 
    Market or
Payout
Value of
Share-
Based
Awards
That Have
Not Vested(2)
  ($)  
  Market or
Payout
Value of
Vested Share-Based
Awards not
Paid Out or
Distributed
  ($)  
  Number of
DSUs(3)
  (#)  
  Market
Value of
Unvested
DSUs
  ($)  
George Albino  

300,000

66,372
95,541

  $
$
$
1.39
1.25
1.06
  Jun 23, 2022
Jun 27, 2023
Mar 29, 2024
  $
$
$
183,000
49,779
89,809
  Nil       Nil   Nil   72,453   $ 144,906
Tim Haldane   300,000
66,372
95,541
  $
$
$
1.39
1.25
1.06
  Jun 23, 2022
Jun 27, 2023
Mar 29, 2024
  $
$
$
183,000
49,779
89,809
  Nil       Nil   Nil   72,453   $ 144,906
Richard Hall   175,000
300,000
66,372
111,465
  $
$
$
$
0.15
1.39
1.25
1.06
  Nov 27, 2020
Jun 23, 2022
Jun 27, 2023
Mar 29, 2024
  $
$
$
$
323,750
183,000
49,779
104,777
  Nil       Nil   Nil   79,528   $ 159,056
Charles Jeannes   600,000
132,743
159,236
  $
$
$
1.39
1.25
1.06
  Jun 23, 2022
Jun 27, 2023
Mar 29, 2024
  $
$
$
366,000
99,557
149,682
  500,000 (4)   $ 525,000   Nil   130,755   $ 261,510
Elizabeth McGregor   103,212   $ 1.65   Aug 13, 2024   $ 36,124   Nil       Nil   Nil   35,714   $ 71,428
Jean Robitaille   28,500
300,000
66,372
79,618
  $
$
$
$
0.81
1.39
1.25
1.06
  Dec 3, 2020
Jun 23, 2022
Jun 27, 2023
Mar 29, 2024
  $
$
$
$
33,915
183,000
49,779
74,841
  Nil       Nil   Nil   65,377   $ 130,754
David Stephens   117,450   $ 1.00   May 15, 2024   $ 117,450   Nil       Nil   Nil   52,500   $ 105,000

 

Notes:

 

(1) Calculated using the closing market price of the Common Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2019 of $2.00 and subtracting the exercise price of in-the-money stock options. These stock options have not been, and may never be, exercised and actual gains, if any, on exercise will depend on the value of the Common Shares on the date of exercise.
(2) Calculated using market price at December 31, 2019 of $2.00.
(3) DSU awards vest immediately upon award. However, DSUs can only be redeemed when the DSU holder ceases to be a director of the Corporation. For more meaningful disclosure, information is provided on unredeemed DSUs rather than unvested DSUs (there are no unvested DSUs). The unredeemed value of DSUs is calculated using the closing market price of the Common Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2019 of $2.00.
(4) Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board approved a one-time award of 500,000 Common Shares (the “Bonus Shares”) to Mr. Jeannes at a deemed issue price of $1.39 per Bonus Share (the “Issue Price”) in consideration for Mr. Jeannes acting as Chairman of the Board, which Bonus Shares have certain trading restrictions. The Issue Price is equal to the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSXV on June 23, 2017. The Bonus Shares will become issuable on the date Mr. Jeannes ceases to act as a director following June 18, 2020. If at any time prior Mr. Jeannes ceases to act as a director there is a change of control, the Bonus Shares will immediately vest and Mr. Jeannes will be entitled to receive any securities, property or cash to which he would have been entitled to receive upon such change of control if the Bonus Shares had vested immediately prior to the applicable record date or event, as the case may be.

 

46

 

 

Directors – Incentive Plan Awards – Value Vested or Earned During the Year

 

The following table provides information concerning the value vested or earned under incentive award plans of the Corporation with respect to each non-executive director of the Corporation during the financial year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Name of Director  

Option-Based Awards - Value
Vested During the
Year
(1)

($)

   

Share-Based Awards –
Value Vested During the
Year
(2)

($)

    Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation - Value Earned
During the Year
($)
George Albino   $ 107,529     $ 45,000     Nil
Tim Haldane   $ 107,529     $ 45,000     Nil
Richard Hall   $ 112,519     $ 52,000     Nil
Charles Jeannes   $ 205,080     $ 75,000     Nil
Elizabeth McGregor   $ 12,041     $ 37,000     Nil
Jean Robitaille   $ 102,540     $ 53,000     Nil
David Stephens   $ 39,150     $ 59,000     Nil

 

Notes:

 

(1) “Value vested during the year” means the aggregate dollar value that would have been realized if the options under the option-based award had been exercised on the vesting date. This amount is calculated using the closing market prices of the Common Shares on the TSX on the dates on which stock options vested during the year, and subtracting the exercise price of in-the-money stock options.

 

(2) “Value vested during the year” for share based awards means the aggregate dollar value of the Common Shares that would be issued on the vesting of the DSUs. This amount is calculated using the closing market price of the Common Shares on the TSX on the dates on which the DSUs were awarded.

 

Deferred Share Unit Plan

 

The Corporation’s existing deferred share unit plan (the “DSU Plan”) which, among other things, provides for the award of Deferred Share Units (“DSUs”) to directors who, at the relevant time, are not otherwise employees or consultants of the Corporation or of any of its affiliates, as further described below. The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares that may be issued under the DSU Plan shall not exceed 2,000,000 Common Shares (representing 1.1% of the outstanding Common Shares). As at April 2, 2020, there are 644,525 DSUs outstanding under the DSU Plan, representing 0.3% of the outstanding Common Shares, and 1,355,475 DSUs remain available for grant, representing 0.7% of the outstanding Common Shares.

 

The maximum number of Common Shares issuable to any one person, in a 12 month period, pursuant to the DSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation (which, for the purposes of this section excludes the 500,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”), is 5% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of Common Shares which may be issuable at any time to insiders (as a group) pursuant to the DSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. Accordingly, a maximum of 1,355,475 DSUs remain available for grant to insiders (representing 0.7% of the outstanding Common Shares).

 

47

 

 

The following table sets out the burn rate of DSUs since adoption of the DSU Plan:

 

Year     DSUs Granted     Weighted Average Securities
Outstanding
    Burn Rate  
2019       328,780       182,619,000       0.2 %
2018       180,000       176,748,000       0.1 %
2017       N/A       N/A       N/A  

 

For a description of the material terms of the DSU Plan, see Schedule “B”.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under the
Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table sets forth aggregated information as at December 31, 2019, with respect to the compensation plan of the Corporation under which equity securities of the Corporation are authorized for issuance.

 

Plan Category   Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
(a)
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights (b)
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
under Equity
Compensation Plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders   Stock options     9,860,138   $              1.21     2,292,880 (1)
    RSUs     1,014,972     N/A     1,985,028 (2)
    DSUs     508,780     N/A     1,491,220 (3)
    Total     11,383,890           5,769,128  
Equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders   Stock options (4)     57,198   $ 0.81     Nil  
    Bonus shares     1,500,000     N/A     Nil  
Total:         12,941,088           5,769,128  

 

Notes:

 

(1) The aggregate number of Common Shares reserved for issuance in respect of all outstanding Options granted under the Stock Option Plan and all other security-based compensation arrangements of the Corporation cannot exceed 10% of the number of issued and outstanding Common Shares (on a non-diluted basis).
(2) The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares available for issuance under the RSU Plan shall not exceed 3,000,000 Common Shares.
(3) The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares that may be issued under the DSU Plan shall not exceed 2,000,000 Common Shares.
(4) Reflects options previously issued by Pershimco Resources Inc. and each such option issued became exercisable for one Common Share in connection with the Pershimco Acquisition.

 

Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers

 

None of the directors and executive officers, or former directors or executive officers, nor any associate of such individuals, of the Corporation is as at the date hereof, or has been, during the financial year ended December 31, 2019, indebted to the Corporation or its subsidiaries in connection with a purchase of securities or otherwise. In addition, no indebtedness of these individuals to another entity has been the subject of a guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or similar arrangement or understanding with Orla or any of its subsidiaries.

 

48

 

 

Interest of Informed Persons in Material Transactions

 

Other than as described herein, Management is not aware of any material interest, direct or indirect, of any informed person of the Corporation, any proposed director or any associate or affiliate of any informed person or proposed director in any transaction since the commencement of our most recently completed financial year, or in any proposed transaction, that has materially affected or would materially affect Orla or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries.

 

On October 20, 2019, the Corporation entered into a commitment letter(the “Commitment Letter”) with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) with respect to a secured project finance facility of up to US$125 million (“Facility”) for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project located in Zacatecas, Mexico (the “Camino Rojo Project”). On December 18, 2019, the Corporation entered into a loan agreement with Trinity Capital and certain other lenders with respect to the Facility. The Facility was arranged by Trinity Capital and includes a syndicate of lenders led by Agnico Eagle, Pierre Lassonde and Trinity Capital.

 

Mr. Jeannes, Ms. McGregor and Mr. Stephens are directors of the Corporation and Mr. Lassonde has beneficial ownership of, control or direction over, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Corporation and each are lenders under the Facility. In consideration for their participation, Messrs. Jeannes, Stephens and Lassonde and Ms. McGregor each received 520,000, 65,000, 5,200,000 and 65,000 warrants, respectively, exercisable at a price of $3.00 per Common Share at any time prior to December 18, 2026. The warrants issued to such insiders did not result in a material change to their respective shareholdings. The Facility, including the participation of the insiders and issuance of warrants in connection therewith, was considered, and ultimately approved by the Board. The directors who participated as lenders declared and disclosed their interest and did not vote on the matter.

 

Other Business

 

Management knows of no amendment, variation or other matter to come before the Meeting other than those set forth in the Notice of Meeting. However, if any other matter properly comes before the Meeting, the Common Shares represented by the accompanying proxy will be voted on such matter in accordance with the best judgment of the person or persons voting the proxy.

 

Additional Information

 

Additional information relating to the Corporation can be found under the Corporation’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Additional financial information is provided in the Corporation’s comparative financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and related and management’s discussion and analysis which can be found under the Corporation’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com Shareholders may also obtain these documents, without charge, upon request to the President at Orla Mining Ltd., Suite 202 - 595 Howe St, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2T5.

 

49

 

 

Approval of Directors

 

The contents and the sending of this Circular have been approved by the directors of the Corporation.

 

DATED as of the 2nd day of April 2020.

 

    “Jason Simpson”
    JASON SIMPSON
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

50

 

 

Schedule “A”

BOARD MANDATE

 

 

See attached.

 

A-1

 

 

Schedule “B”

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN SUMMARIES

 

10% Rolling Stock Option Plan

 

The following provides a summary of the Stock Option Plan. The Stock Option Plan shall be administered by the Board or a committee established by the Board for that purpose. Subject to approval of the granting of options by the Board, the Corporation shall grant options under the Stock Option Plan.

 

The Stock Option Plan provides that the aggregate number of Common Shares of the Corporation which may be available for issuance under the Stock Option Plan, together with Common Shares issuable under all security based compensation arrangements, will not exceed 10% of the total number of Common Shares of the Corporation issued and outstanding from time to time.

 

(a) The total number of options which may be granted to any one person under the Stock Option Plan, together with Common Shares issuable under all security based compensation arrangements, shall not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Corporation, calculated on the date an option is granted to such individual.

 

(b) The maximum number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance under options granted to insiders (as a group) under the Stock Option Plan, together with Common Shares issuable under all security based compensation arrangements, shall be 10% of the Common Shares issued and outstanding at the time of the grant (on a non-diluted basis).

 

(c) The maximum number of options which may be granted to insiders (as a group) under the Stock Option Plan, together with any other of the Corporation’s previously established and outstanding stock option plans or grants, within any 12 month period, together with Common Shares issuable under all security based compensation arrangements, shall be 10% of the issued Common Shares, calculated on the date an option is granted to any insider.

 

(d) The maximum equity value that may be granted to each non-employee director under the Stock Option Plan, together with all security-based compensation arrangements of the Corporation, shall not exceed $150,000 in any fiscal year, of which not more than $100,000 may be in the form of stock options granted under the Stock Option Plan.

 

The exercise price for the Common Shares of the Corporation under each option shall be determined by the Board on the basis of the “market price” (as set out in the Stock Option Plan). The exercise of options issued may not be less than the market price of the Common Shares at the time the option is granted, less any discounts allowed by the TSX (subject to the minimum exercise price allowed by the TSX). Subject to the provisions of the Stock Option Plan and the particular option, an option may be exercised by delivering a written notice of exercise to the Corporation along with payment in cash or certified cheque for the full amount of the purchase price of the Common Shares then being purchased.

 

The period within which options may be exercised and the number of options which may be exercised in any such period are determined by the Board at the time of granting the options provided, however, that the maximum term of any options awarded under the Stock Option Plan is 10 years. On the expiry date of an option it will expire and terminate, subject to any extension of such expiry date permitted in accordance with the Stock Option Plan.

 

An optionee who ceases to be an Eligible Person (as defined in the Stock Option Plan) for any reason other than as a result of having been dismissed for cause or as a result of the optionee’s death, may exercise any vested and unexpired options held by such optionee for a period of 90 days from the date of cessation (unless such period is extended by the Board). In the event of death of an optionee, the optionee’s representative may exercise any vested and unexpired options held by the optionee for a period of 12 months from the optionee’s death. If an optionee ceases to be either an Eligible Person as a result of having been dismissed from any such position for cause, all unexercised option rights of that optionee under the Stock Option Plan shall immediately become terminated and shall lapse, notwithstanding the original term of the option granted to such optionee under the Stock Option Plan.

 

B-1

 

 

In the event that the expiry date of an option expires during, or within 48 hours of a trading blackout period imposed by the Corporation, and neither the Corporation nor the individual in possession of the options is subject to a cease trade order in respect of the Corporation’s securities, then the expiry date of such option shall be automatically extended to the 10th business day following the end of the blackout period.

 

Options granted under the Stock Option Plan will be non-assignable and non-transferable by an optionee other than pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and such option will be exercisable, during an optionee’s lifetime, only by the optionee.

 

The Stock Option Plan contains provisions for the treatment and appropriate adjustment of options in relation to capital changes and with regard to a reorganization, recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares, merger, consolidation, rights offering or any other change in the corporate structure or shares of the Corporation. The options granted under the Stock Option Plan may contain such provisions as the Board may determine with respect to adjustments to be made in the number and kind of shares covered by such options and in the option price in the event of any such change. If a bona fide offer ( an “Offer”) for Common Shares is made to shareholders of the Corporation generally or to a class of shareholders which includes the optionee, which Offer, if accepted in whole or in part, would result in the offeror becoming a control person of the Corporation, within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws, all optioned shares subject to such stock option will become vested and the stock option may be exercised in whole or in part so as to permit the optionee to tender the optioned shares received upon such exercise, pursuant to the Offer.

 

In the event of (i) a Change of Control (as defined in the Stock Option Plan), and (ii) within 12 months of such Change of Control the Corporation terminates the employment of the Eligible Person for any reason other than just cause, or the Eligible Person resigns for “Good Reason” as defined in the employment agreement then all of a that person’s stock options will immediately vest on the date of such termination. In such event, all vested stock options will be exercisable, conditionally or otherwise, from such date until their respective expiry dates, subject to the terms of any employment agreement or other contractual arrangement between the person and the Corporation. If the person elects to exercise its stock options following a Change of Control, the holder of stock options shall be entitled to receive, and shall accept, in lieu of the number of Common Shares which the holder was entitled upon such exercise, the kind and amount of shares and other securities, property or cash which such holder could have been entitled to receive as a result of such Change of Control, on the effective date thereof, had the holder been the registered holder of the number of Common Shares to which it was entitled to purchase upon exercise of such stock options.

 

Subject to any requisite shareholder and regulatory approvals, the Board may at any time amend or terminate the Stock Option Plan.

 

The Stock Option Plan was last approved by Shareholders at the annual and special meeting of the Corporation held on June 12, 2019.

 

B-2

 

 

Restricted Share Unit Plan

 

The following provides a summary of the RSU Plan currently in existence, which plan governs the RSU grants forming part of the 2019 compensation. At the Meeting, shareholders will be asked to vote on the adoption of the Replacement RSU Plan. See “Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon Adoption of Replacement Restricted Share Unit Plan” in this Circular for additional details and Schedule “C” for a summary description of the Replacement RSU Plan.

 

The following provides a summary of the RSU Plan. The RSU Plan provides that RSUs may be granted by the Board, or, if the Board so delegates, by the Compensation Committee which administers the RSU Plan to eligible employees, directors, officers and consultants of the Corporation or an affiliate in a calendar year as a bonus for services rendered to the Corporation or an affiliate in the fiscal year ending in such year, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee. The number of RSUs awarded will be credited to the participant’s account effective as of the grant date. The Compensation Committee shall from time to time determine the participants to whom RSUs shall be granted and the provisions and restrictions with respect to such grant and the Compensation Committee may take into consideration the present and potential contributions of and the services rendered by the particular participant to the success of the Corporation and any other factors which the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and relevant.

 

The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares available for issuance under the RSU Plan shall not exceed 3,000,000. The maximum number of RSUs available for grant to any one person, in a 12 month period, pursuant to the RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation (which, for the purposes of this summary excludes the 500,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”), is 5% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of Common Shares which may be issuable at any time to insiders (as a group) pursuant to the RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of RSUs which may be granted to insiders (as a group), within any one year period, pursuant to the RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum value of RSUs which may be granted to each director who is not also an eligible employee, together with all other security based compensation arrangements, shall not exceed $150,000 (based on the closing trading price of the Common Shares on the grant date of an RSU or DSU (as defined below), as the case may be (the “Market Value”) in any financial year).

 

For purposes of determining the number of Common Shares that remain available for issuance under the RSU Plan, the number of Common Shares underlying any grants of RSUs that are surrendered, forfeited, waived, repurchased by the Corporation and/or cancelled shall be added back to the RSU Plan and again be available for future grant, whereas the number of Common Shares underlying any grants of RSUs that are issued shall not be available for future grant.

 

Each RSU granted to a participant for services rendered entitles the holder, subject to the terms of the RSU Plan, to receive: (i) one Common Share for each RSU; or (ii) a cash payment equal to the number of RSUs multiplied by the fair market value (as defined in the RSU Plan) of one Common Share on the vesting date; or (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii), as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, on the date when the RSU award is fully vested (the “Participant’s Entitlement Date”). The Compensation Committee will have the absolute discretion to credit a participant with additional RSUs equal to the aggregate amount of any dividends that would have been paid to the participant if the RSUs had been Common Shares, divided by the Market Value of the Common Shares on the date on which dividends were paid by the Corporation.

 

Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, in the event that any Participant’s Entitlement Date expires during, or within 48 hours after a self-imposed blackout period on the trading of securities of the Corporation, such expiry will occur on the business day immediately following the end of the blackout period, or such 48 hour period, as applicable, provided that under no circumstances shall the Participant’s Entitlement Date be later than December 15th of the third calendar year following the calendar year in which the RSUs were granted.

 

B-3

 

 

If the employment or services of the participant that has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an affiliate since the date the RSUs were granted are terminated prior to the Participant’s Entitlement Date, for any reason other than death, disability, termination without cause or resignation for good reason, then, except as provided for in the RSU grant letter or as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, all unvested RSUs will be forfeited by the participant, and be of no further force and effect, as of the date of termination. In the event of termination without cause or resignation for good reason, the participant’s unvested RSUs will vest in full on the date of termination and the Common Shares and/or cash underlying the RSUs credited to the participant’s account shall be issued and/or paid to the participant as soon as practicable thereafter, provided, that for a participant who is a United States taxpayer, the date of issuance or payment shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the Participant’s termination without cause or for good reason and provided further, that such participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of payment. In the event of death, all unvested RSUs credited to the participant will vest on the date of the participant’s death and the Common Shares and/or cash underlying the RSUs credited to the participant’s account shall be issued and/or paid to the participant’s estate as soon as practicable thereafter, provided, that for a participant who is a United States taxpayer, the date of issuance or payment shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the participant’s death and provided further, that such Participant’s estate does not have a choice as to the taxable year of payment. In the event of the total disability of a participant, all unvested RSUs credited to the participant will vest in full within 90 days following the date on which the participant is determined to be totally disabled, and the Common Shares and/or cash underlying such RSUs credited to the participant’s account shall be issued and/or paid to the participant as soon as practicable thereafter, provided, that for a participant who is a United States taxpayer, s the date of issuance or payment shall not be more than 90 days after the date on which the participant is determined to be totally disabled and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of payment. In the event of (i) a Change of Control (as defined in the RSU Plan), and (ii) within 12 months of such Change of Control the Corporation terminates the employment of the participant for any reason other than just cause, then all unvested RSUs outstanding shall immediately vest on the date of such termination notwithstanding any stated vesting period. In any event, upon a Change of Control, participants shall not be treated any more favourably than Shareholders with respect to the consideration that the participants would be entitled to receive for their Common Shares, provided, however, that for a participant who is a United States taxpayer, the Change of Control must also constitute a “change in control event” as set forth in Treas. Reg. §1.409A-3(i)(5)(i) and provided further, that any issuance or payment must occur in full within five years of the date of the Change of Control.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the RSU Plan, the Board or the Compensation Committee, as the case may be, may discontinue or amend the RSU Plan at any time, provided that, without the consent of a participant, such discontinuance or amendment may not in any manner adversely affect the participant’s rights under any RSU granted under the RSU Plan.

 

The Board or the Compensation Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory and Shareholder approval, make the following amendments to the RSU Plan or RSUs under the RSU Plan:

 

(a) amendments to increase the number of Common Shares, subject to the RSU Plan, which may be issued pursuant to the RSU Plan;

 

(b) amendments to the definition of “Participant” under the RSU Plan which would have the potential of narrowing, broadening or increasing insider participation;

 

(c) amendments to cancel and reissue Restricted Share Units;

 

(d) amendments to the amendment provisions of the RSU Plan;

 

(e) amendments that extend the term of an RSU;

 

(f) amendments to the participation limits as set out in the RSU Plan; or

 

(g) amendments that would permit RSUs, or any other right or interest of a participant under the RSU Plan, to be assigned or transferred, other than for normal estate settlement purposes.

 

B-4

 

 

The Board or the Compensation Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory approval, where required, but not subject to Shareholder approval, in its sole discretion make all other amendments to the RSU Plan or RSUs under the RSU Plan that are not of the type contemplated above, including, without limitation:

 

(a) amendments of a housekeeping nature;

 

(b) amendments to the vesting provisions of an RSU or the RSU Plan;

 

(c) amendments to the definitions, other than such definitions noted above;

 

(d) amendments to reflect changes to applicable securities laws; and

 

(e) amendments to ensure that the RSUs granted under the Plan will comply with any provisions respecting income tax and other laws in force in any country or jurisdiction of which a participant to whom an RSU has been granted may from time to time be a resident, citizen or otherwise subject to tax therein.

 

Except as otherwise may be expressly provided for under the RSU Plan or pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution, no RSU and no other right or interest of a participant is assignable or transferable, and any such assignment or transfer in violation of the RSU Plan shall be null and void.

 

In the event there is any change to the Common Shares, whether by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification, an appropriate adjustment shall be made by the Compensation Committee in the number of Common Shares available under the RSU Plan and the number of Common Shares subject to any RSUs. If there is an increase in the number of Common Shares outstanding for any reason, other than by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification as described above (for example, as a result of a private placement of Common Shares or the issuance of Common Shares in connection with the acquisition of an asset), there will be no adjustment to the number of Common Shares that a participant will receive under his or her RSU grant letter award and no adjustment to the number of Common Shares available under the RSU Plan.

 

If the foregoing adjustment shall result in a fractional Common Share, the fraction shall be disregarded. All such adjustments shall be conclusive, final and binding for all purposes of the RSU Plan.

 

The RSU Plan was last approved by Shareholders at the annual and special meeting of the Corporation held on June 12, 2019.

 

Deferred Share Unit Plan

 

The following provides a summary of the DSU Plan. The purpose of the DSU Plan is to strengthen the alignment of interests between the eligible directors and Shareholders by linking a portion of annual director compensation, as determined by the Compensation Committee from time to time, to the future value of the Common Shares. In addition, the DSU Plan advances the interests of the Corporation by motivating, attracting and retaining the directors of the Corporation and its affiliates and encouraging their commitment and performance due to the opportunity offered to them to receive compensation in line with the value of the Common Shares. The DSU Plan is administered by the Board, or, if the Board so delegates, by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has full discretionary authority to administer the DSU Plan, including the authority to interpret and construe any provision of the DSU Plan and to adopt, amend and rescind such rules and regulations for administering the DSU Plan as the Compensation Committee deems necessary to comply with the provisions of the DSU Plan.

 

B-5

 

 

Subject to certain adjustments, the aggregate maximum number of Common Shares that may be issued under the DSU Plan shall not exceed 2,000,000. The maximum number of Common Shares issuable to any one person, in a 12 month period, pursuant to the DSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation (which, for the purposes of this summary excludes the 500,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”), is 5% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of Common Shares which may be issuable to insiders (as a group) pursuant to the DSU Plan, or together with any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of DSUs which may be granted to insiders (as a group), within any one year period, pursuant to the DSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum value of DSUs which may be granted to each eligible director who is not also an employee or consultant of the Corporation or any affiliate, together with all security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation, shall not exceed $150,000 (based on the Market Value of the DSUs) in any financial year.

 

For purposes of determining the number of Common Shares that remain available for issuance under the DSU Plan, the number of Common Shares underlying any grants of DSUs that are surrendered, forfeited, waived, repurchased by the Corporation and/or cancelled shall be added back to the DSU Plan and again be available for future grant, whereas the number of Common Shares underlying any grants of DSUs that are issued shall not be available for future grant.

 

Under the DSU Plan, non-executive directors may receive a grant of DSUs, as determined by the Compensation Committee from time to time. Each DSU entitles the participant to payment in fully-paid Common Shares, issued from the treasury of the Corporation, a cash payment, in an amount equal to the number of DSUs held by the participant on the date the participant ceases to be an eligible director for any reason whatsoever (the “Separation Date”) multiplied by the fair market value of one Common Share on the date the DSU is redeemed, in lieu thereof, or any combination thereof, at the Compensation Committee’s discretion (the “DSU Payment”). DSUs must be retained until the eligible director leaves the Board, at which time the DSUs will be paid out. In the event dividends are declared and paid, additional DSUs may be credited to reflect dividends paid on the Common Shares, at the absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee. In such case, the number of additional DSUs will be equal to the aggregate amount of dividends that would have been paid to the participant if the DSUs in the participant’s account had been Common Shares divided by the Market Value of a Common Share on the date on which dividends were paid by the Corporation.

 

Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, in the event that any Separation Date occurs during, or within 48 hours after a self-imposed blackout period on the trading of securities of the Corporation, settlement of the applicable DSUs will occur on the applicable Redemption Date (as defined in the DSU Plan).

 

Each outstanding DSU held by a participant shall be redeemed by the Corporation on the participant’s Separation Date, less applicable taxes and other source deductions required to be held by the Corporation. Fractional DSUs will be cancelled.

 

The Corporation or its affiliates may take such steps as are considered necessary or appropriate for the withholding of any taxes required to be paid by any law or regulation of any governmental authority whatsoever to withhold in connection with any payment or delivery of Common Shares or cash made under the DSU Plan including, without limitation, the withholding of all or any portion of any payment or the withholding of the issue of Common Shares to be issued under the DSU Plan, until such time as the participant has paid any amount which the Corporation and its affiliates are required to withhold with respect to such taxes. For greater certainty, immediately upon delivery of any Common Shares, the Corporation shall have the right to require that a participant sell a given number of Common Shares to the Corporation or an affiliate of the Corporation sufficient to cover any applicable withholding taxes and any other source deductions to be withheld by the Corporation in connection with payments made in satisfaction of the participant’s vested DSUs.

 

B-6

 

 

The Board or the Compensation Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory and Shareholder approval, make the following amendments to the DSU Plan or to DSUs under the DSU Plan:

 

(a) amendments to increase the number of Common Shares which may be issued pursuant to the DSU Plan;

 

(b) amendments to the amendment provisions of the DSU Plan;

 

(c) amendments to cancel and reissue DSUs;

 

(d) amendments that extend the term of a DSU;

 

(e) amendments to the participation limits in the DSU Plan;

 

(f) amendments that would permit DSUs to be transferred other than for normal estate settlement purposes; or

 

(g) materially modify the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan.

 

The Board or the Compensation Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory approval, where required, in its sole discretion, without Shareholder approval, make all other amendments to the DSU Plan or to DSUs under the DSU Plan that are not of the type contemplated above, including, without limitation:

 

(a) amendments of a housekeeping nature;

 

(b) amendments to the definitions;

 

(c) amendments to reflect changes to applicable securities laws; and

 

(d) amendments to ensure that the DSUs granted under the DSU Plan will comply with any provisions respecting income tax and other laws in force in any country or jurisdiction of which a participant to whom a DSU has been granted may from time to time be a resident or otherwise subject to tax therein.

 

Except as otherwise may be expressly provided for under the DSU Plan or pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution, no DSU and no other right or interest of a participant is assignable or transferable, and any such assignment or transfer in violation of the DSU Plan shall be null and void.

 

In the event there is any change to the Common Shares, whether by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification, an appropriate adjustment shall be made by the Compensation Committee with respect to the number of Common Shares available under the DSU Plan and the number of Common Shares subject to or underlying any DSU as the Compensation Committee may determine. However, if there is an increase in the number of Common Shares outstanding for any reason other than by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification as described above (for example, as a result of a private placement of Common Shares or the issuance of Common Shares in connection with the acquisition of an asset) there will be no adjustment to the number of Common Shares that a participant will receive under his or her DSU grant letter award and no adjustment to the number of Common Shares available under the DSU Plan.

 

If the foregoing adjustment shall result in a fractional Share, the fraction shall be disregarded. All such adjustments shall be conclusive, final and binding for all purposes of the DSU Plan.

 

The DSU Plan was last approved by Shareholders at the annual and special meeting of the Corporation held on June 12, 2019.

 

B-7

 

 

Schedule “C”

2020 RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT PLAN SUMMARY

 

2020 Restricted Share Unit Plan

 

The following provides a summary of the Replacement RSU Plan. At the Meeting, shareholders will be asked to vote on the adoption of the Replacement RSU Plan. See “Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon Adoption of Replacement Restricted Share Unit Plan” in this Circular for additional details.

The Replacement RSU Plan provides that RSUs may be granted by the Board, or, if the Board so delegates, by the Compensation Committee which administers the Replacement RSU Plan to eligible employees, directors, officers and consultants of the Corporation or an affiliate as remuneration to such participant, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee. The number of RSUs awarded will be credited to the participant’s account effective as of the grant date. The Compensation Committee shall from time to time determine the participants to whom RSUs shall be granted and the provisions and restrictions with respect to such grant and the Compensation Committee may take into consideration the present and potential contributions of and the services rendered by the particular participant to the success of the Corporation and any other factors which the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and relevant.

 

The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares available for issuance under the Replacement RSU Plan shall not exceed 3,000,000 (being 1.6% of the outstanding Common Shares). The maximum number of RSUs available for grant to any one person, in a 12 month period, pursuant to the Replacement RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation (which, for the purposes of this summary excludes the 500,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”), is 5% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of Common Shares which may be issuable at any time to insiders (as a group) pursuant to the Replacement RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of RSUs which may be granted to insiders (as a group), within any one year period, pursuant to the Replacement RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum value of RSUs which may be granted to each director who is not also an eligible employee, together with all other security based compensation arrangements, shall not exceed $150,000 (based on the closing trading price of the Common Shares on the grant date of an RSU or DSU (as defined below), as the case may be (the “Market Value”) in any financial year).

 

For purposes of determining the number of Common Shares that remain available for issuance under the Replacement RSU Plan, the number of Common Shares underlying any grants of RSUs that are surrendered, forfeited, waived, repurchased by the Corporation and/or cancelled without the Restricted Period (as defined below) having expired shall be added back to the Replacement RSU Plan and again be available for future grant, whereas the number of Common Shares underlying any grants of RSUs that are issued shall not be available for future grant.

 

Each RSU granted to a participant, subject to the terms of the Replacement RSU Plan, entitles such participant to receive one Common Share for each RSU on the date following the period of time that such RSU is not exercisable and the participant holding such RSU is ineligible to receive Common Shares (the “Restricted Period”) or such date after the after the Restricted Period to which the participant, other than a US Participant (as defined below), has elected to defer receipt of the Common Shares (the “Deferred Payment Date”) provided, that for a US Participant, the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the end of the Restricted Period and provided further, that such participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance. Participants who elect to set a Deferred Payment Date must give the Corporation written notice of one or more Deferred Payment Dates not later than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period. Participants may change a Deferred Payment Date by providing written notice to the Corporation not later than thirty (30) days prior to the Deferred Payment Date.

 

The Compensation Committee will have the absolute discretion to credit a participant with additional RSUs equal to the aggregate amount of any dividends that would have been paid to the participant if the RSUs had been Common Shares, divided by the Market Value of the Common Shares on the date on which dividends were paid by the Corporation.

 

C-1

 

 

Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, in the event that any Restricted Period expires or, if applicable, any Deferred Payment Date occurs during, or within 48 hours after, a self-imposed blackout period on the trading of securities of the Corporation, such Restricted Period or Deferred Payment Date shall be automatically extended until 48 hours after such blackout period has expired.

 

If the employment or services of the participant that has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an affiliate since the date the RSUs were granted are terminated during the Restricted Period, for any reason other than death, disability, termination without cause or resignation for good reason, then, except as provided for in the RSU grant letter or as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, all RSUs will be forfeited by the participant (other than any vested RSUs that have been deferred prior to such termination or resignation), and be of no further force and effect, as of the date of termination or resignation. In the event of termination without cause or resignation for good reason during the Restricted Period, the Corporation shall issue forthwith Common Shares in accordance with the RSUs held by the participant on the date of termination, notwithstanding any applicable Deferred Payment Date, provided, that for a participant who would be subject to taxation under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (a “US Participant”), the date of issuance or payment shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the participant’s termination or resignation and provided further, that such US Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of payment. In the event of termination without cause or resignation for good reason following the Restricted Period and prior to the Deferred Payment Date, the Corporation shall issue forthwith Common Shares in accordance with the RSUs held by the participant. In the event of death, any Common Shares represented by RSUs held by the participant on the date of the participant’s death shall be immediately issuable by the Corporation notwithstanding any Deferred Payment Date, provided, that for a US Participant, the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the participant’s death and provided further, that such participant’s estate does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance. In the event of the total disability of a participant, any Common Shares represented by RSUs held by the participant on the date on which the participant is determined to be totally disabled, shall be immediately issuable by the Corporation notwithstanding any applicable Deferred Payment Date(s), provided, that for a US Participant the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the date on which the participant is determined to be totally disabled and provided further, that such participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance. In the event of (i) a Change of Control (as defined in the Replacement RSU Plan), and (ii) within 12 months of such Change of Control the Corporation terminates the employment of the participant for any reason other than just cause, then all unvested RSUs outstanding shall immediately vest on the date of such termination, and the Corporation shall forthwith issue the Common Shares to the participant, notwithstanding any stated vesting period or any applicable Deferred Payment Date; provided, that for a US Participant, except as described below in this paragraph, the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the participant’s termination and provided further, that such participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance. In any event, upon a Change of Control, participants shall not be treated any more favourably than Shareholders with respect to the consideration that the participants would be entitled to receive for their Common Shares, provided, however, that for a US Participant, any issuance must occur in full within five years of the date of the Change of Control.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the Replacement RSU Plan, the Board or the Compensation Committee, as the case may be, may discontinue or amend the Replacement RSU Plan at any time, provided that, without the consent of a participant, such discontinuance or amendment may not in any manner adversely affect the participant’s rights under any RSU granted under the Replacement RSU Plan.

 

The Board or the Compensation Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory and Shareholder approval, make the following amendments to the Replacement RSU Plan or RSUs under the Replacement RSU Plan:

 

(a) amendments to increase the number of Common Shares, subject to the Replacement RSU Plan, which may be issued pursuant to the Replacement RSU Plan;

 

(b) amendments to the definition of “Participant” under the Replacement RSU Plan which would have the potential of narrowing, broadening or increasing insider participation;

 

(c) amendments to cancel and reissue Restricted Share Units;

 

C-2

 

 

(d) amendments to the amendment provisions of the Replacement RSU Plan;

 

(e) amendments that extend the term of an RSU;

 

(f) amendments to the participation limits as set out in the Replacement RSU Plan; or

 

(g) amendments that would permit RSUs, or any other right or interest of a participant under the Replacement RSU Plan, to be assigned or transferred, other than for normal estate settlement purposes.

 

The Board or the Compensation Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory approval, where required, but not subject to Shareholder approval, in its sole discretion make all other amendments to the Replacement RSU Plan or RSUs under the Replacement RSU Plan that are not of the type contemplated above, including, without limitation:

 

(a) amendments of a housekeeping nature;

 

(b) amendments to the vesting provisions of an RSU or the Replacement RSU Plan;

 

(c) amendments to the definitions, other than such definitions noted above;

 

(d) amendments to reflect changes to applicable securities laws; and

 

(e) amendments to ensure that the RSUs granted under the Plan will comply with any provisions respecting income tax and other laws in force in any country or jurisdiction of which a participant to whom an RSU has been granted may from time to time be a resident, citizen or otherwise subject to tax therein.

 

Except as otherwise may be expressly provided for under the Replacement RSU Plan or pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution, no RSU and no other right or interest of a participant is assignable or transferable, and any such assignment or transfer in violation of the Replacement RSU Plan shall be null and void.

 

In the event there is any change to the Common Shares, whether by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification, an appropriate adjustment shall be made by the Compensation Committee in the number of Common Shares available under the Replacement RSU Plan and the number of Common Shares subject to any RSUs. If there is an increase in the number of Common Shares outstanding for any reason, other than by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification as described above (for example, as a result of a private placement of Common Shares or the issuance of Common Shares in connection with the acquisition of an asset), there will be no adjustment to the number of Common Shares that a participant will receive under his or her RSU grant letter award and no adjustment to the number of Common Shares available under the Replacement RSU Plan.

 

If the foregoing adjustment shall result in a fractional Common Share, the fraction shall be disregarded. All such adjustments shall be conclusive, final and binding for all purposes of the Replacement RSU Plan.

 

C-3

 

 

 

EXHIBIT “A”

 

Copy of the proposed 2020 Restricted Share Unit Plan

 

See attached.

 

C-4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

2020 RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT PLAN

 

EFFECTIVE APRIL 2, 2020

 

Article One

DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

 

Section 1.01        Definitions: For the purposes of this Plan, unless such word or term is otherwise defined herein or the context in which such word or term is used herein otherwise requires, the following words and terms with the initial letter or letters thereof capitalized shall have the following meanings:

 

A. Act” means the Canada Business Corporations Act, or its successor, as amended, from time to time;

 

B. Affiliate” means any corporation that is an affiliate of the Corporation as defined in National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus and Registration Exemptions, as may be amended from time to time;

 

C. Board” means the Board of Directors of the Corporation;

 

D. Cause” with respect to a Participant has the meaning set forth in the Participant’s employment agreement with the Corporation or one of its Affiliates;

 

E. Change of Control” means, in respect of the Corporation: (i) if, as a result of or in connection with the election of directors, the people who were directors (or who were entitled under a contractual arrangement to be directors) of the Corporation before the election cease to constitute a majority of the Board, unless the directors have been nominated by management or approved by a majority of the previously serving directors; (ii) any transaction at any time and by whatever means pursuant to which any person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert as a single control group or any affiliate (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation or in connection with a reorganization of the Corporation) or any one or more directors thereof hereafter “beneficially owns” (as defined in the Act) directly or indirectly, or acquires the right to exercise control or direction over, voting securities of the Corporation representing 50% or more of the then issued and outstanding voting securities of the Corporation, as the case may be, in any manner whatsoever; (iii) the sale, assignment, lease or other transfer or disposition of more than 50% of the assets of the Corporation to a person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation or in connection with a reorganization of the Corporation); (iv) the occurrence of a transaction requiring approval of the Corporation’s shareholders whereby the Corporation is acquired through consolidation, merger, exchange of securities involving all of the Corporation’s voting securities, purchase of assets, amalgamation, statutory arrangement or otherwise by any person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert (other than a short-form amalgamation of the Corporation or an exchange of securities with a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation or a reorganization of the Corporation); or (v) any sale, lease, exchange, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation other than in the ordinary course of business;

 

F. Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;

 

C-5

 

 

G. Committee” means the Board or, if the Board so determines in accordance with Section 2.03 of the Plan, the committee of the Board authorized to administer the Plan which includes any compensation committee of the Board;

 

H. Corporation” means Orla Mining Ltd., a corporation existing under the Act, and includes any successor corporation thereof;

 

I. Deferred Payment Date” means the date, for a Participant under the Plan, after the Restricted Period to which the Participant has elected to defer receipt of the Shares;

 

J. Director” means a member of the Board, or a member of the board of directors of an Affiliate, from time to time;

 

K. Disability” with respect to a Participant, has the meaning set forth in such Participant’s employment or consulting agreement with the Corporation or one of its Affiliates;

 

L. Eligible Consultant” has the meaning of “Consultant” set out in Section 2.22 of National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus and Registration Exemptions, as may be amended or replaced from time to time;

 

M. Eligible Employees” means (a) an individual who is considered an employee of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries under the Income Tax Act (Canada) (and for whom income tax, employment insurance and CPP deductions must be made at source); (b) an individual who works full-time for the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries providing services normally provided by an employee and who is subject to the same control and direction by the Corporation over the details and methods of work as an employee of the Corporation, but for whom income tax deductions are not made at source; or (c) an individual who works for the Corporation or its subsidiary on a continuing and regular basis for a minimum amount of time per week (the number of hours should be disclosed in the submission) providing services normally provided by an employee and who is subject to the same control and direction by the Corporation over the details and methods of work as an employee of the Corporation but for whom income tax deductions are not made at source;

 

N. Fair Market Value” means, at any date, the higher of: (i) weighted average price per share at which the Shares have traded on the TSX during the last five (5) trading days prior to that date; and (ii) the closing price of the Shares on the TSX on the date prior to the relevant date or, if the Shares are not then listed and posted for trading on the TSX, then on such stock exchange on which the Shares are then listed and posted for trading as may be selected for such purpose by the Board, or, if the Shares are not then listed and posted for trading on any stock exchange, then it shall be the fair market value per Share as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion; and for such purposes, the weighted average price per share at which the Shares have traded on the TSX or on any other stock exchange shall be calculated by dividing: (i) the aggregate sale price for all of the Shares traded on such stock exchange during the relevant five (5) trading days by (ii) the aggregate number of Shares traded on such stock exchange during the relevant five (5) trading days;

 

O. Good Reason” with respect to a Participant has the meaning set forth in the Participant’s employment agreement with the Corporation or one of its Affiliates;

 

C-6

 

 

P. Grant Date” means the date that the Restricted Share Unit is granted to a Participant under the Plan, as evidenced by the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter as agreed to by the Participant;

 

Q. Insider” means an insider as defined in the TSX Company Manual;

 

R. Market Value” means the closing trading price of the Shares on the Grant Date or other applicable date, as reported by the TSX. If the Shares are not trading on the TSX, then the Market Value shall be determined based on the trading price on such stock exchange or over-the-counter market on which the Shares are listed and posted for trading as may be selected for such purpose by the Committee. In the event that the Shares are not listed and posted for trading on any stock exchange or over-the-counter market, the Market Value shall be the Fair Market Value of such Shares as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion;

 

S. Participant” means each Eligible Employee, Director or Eligible Consultant to whom Restricted Share Units are granted hereunder;

 

T. Plan” means this Restricted Share Unit Plan, as same may be amended from time to time;

 

U. Restricted Period” means any period of time that a Restricted Share Unit is not exercisable and the Participant holding such Restricted Share Unit remains ineligible to receive Shares, determined by the Committee in its absolute discretion, however, such period of time may be reduced or eliminated from time to time and at any time and for any reason as determined by the Committee, including but not limited to circumstances involving death or disability of a Participant;

 

V. Restricted Share Unit” means a unit credited by means of an entry on the books of the Corporation to a Participant, representing the right to receive, on the expiry of the Restricted Period or, if applicable at a later Deferred Payment Date, fully paid Shares as set out in the Participant’s Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter;

 

W. Restricted Share Unit Award” means an award of Restricted Share Units under the Plan to a Participant;

 

X. Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter” means the letter to the Participant from the Corporation and agreed to by the Participant evidencing the grant of Restricted Share Units;

 

Y. Resignation” means the cessation of employment of the Participant with the Corporation or an Affiliate as a result of resignation;

 

Z. Security Based Compensation Arrangement” includes, without limitation: (i) stock option plans for the benefit of employees, Insiders, service providers or any one of such groups; (ii) individual stock options granted to employees, service providers or Insiders if not granted pursuant to a plan previously approved by the Corporation’s security holders; (iii) stock purchase plans where the Corporation provides financial assistance or where the Corporation matches the whole or a portion of the securities being purchased; (iv) stock appreciation rights involving issuances of securities from treasury; (v) any other compensation or incentive mechanism involving the issuance or potential issuances of securities of the Corporation; and (vi) security purchases from treasury by an employee, Insider or service provider which is financially assisted by the Corporation by any means whatsoever, but shall not include the 500,000 Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”;

 

C-7

 

 

AA. Shares” means the common shares in the capital of the Corporation, as adjusted in accordance with the provisions of Article Five of this Plan;

 

BB. subsidiary” means, in respect of a person, a body corporate or other entity which is directly or indirectly controlled by such person. For such purposes, a person shall be deemed to control another person if such person possesses, directly or indirectly, the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such other person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise;

 

CC. Termination” means (i) in the case of an Eligible Employee, the later of the last day of work and the statutory notice period (if any) following notification of termination of the employment of the Eligible Employee with or without Cause by the Corporation or an Affiliate or notification of termination of the employment of the Eligible Employee for Resignation with or without Good Reason and, for certainty, does not include any period of contractual or common law notice or severance; (ii) in the case of an Eligible Consultant, the termination of the services of the Eligible Consultant by the Company or any Affiliate or the Eligible Consultant; and (iii) in the case of a Director, the removal of or failure to re-elect or re-appoint the Director as a director of the Company or any Affiliate; for greater certainty, in all cases, other than for death or disability of a Participant;

 

DD. TSX” means the Toronto Stock Exchange;

 

EE. TSX Company Manual” means the TSX Company Manual setting forth the rules and policies of the TSX, as the same may be amended from time to time; and

 

FF. US Participant” means a Participant who would be subject to taxation under the Code in respect of income derived from the Restricted Share Units.

 

Section 1.02        Headings: The headings of all articles, Sections, and paragraphs in the Plan are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of the Plan.

 

Section 1.03        Context, Construction: Whenever the singular or masculine are used in the Plan, the same shall be construed as being the plural or feminine or neuter or vice versa where the context so requires.

 

Section 1.04        References to this Restricted Share Unit Plan: The words “herein”, “hereby”, “hereunder”, “hereof” and similar expressions mean or refer to the Plan as a whole and not to any particular article, Section, paragraph or other part hereof.

 

Section 1.05        Canadian Funds: Unless otherwise specifically provided, all references to dollar amounts in the Plan are references to lawful money of Canada.

 

Article Two

PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT PLAN

 

Section 2.01        Purpose of the Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan provides for the payment of remuneration to Participants to be satisfied by the issuance of Shares for the purpose of advancing the interests of the Corporation and its Affiliates through the motivation, attraction and retention of Eligible Employees, Directors and Eligible Consultants and to secure for the Corporation and the shareholders of the Corporation the benefits inherent in the ownership of Shares or Share equivalent by such persons, it being generally recognized that restricted share plans aid in attracting, retaining and encouraging employees due to the opportunity offered to them to benefit from a proprietary interest in the Corporation.

 

C-8

 

 

Section 2.02           Administration of the Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan shall be administered by the Committee and the Committee shall have full authority to administer the Plan and to adopt, amend and rescind such rules and regulations for administering the Plan as the Committee may deem necessary in order to comply with the requirements of the Plan. No member of the Committee shall be personally liable for any action taken or determination or interpretation made in good faith in connection with the Plan and all members of the Committee shall, in addition to their rights as Directors, be fully protected, indemnified and held harmless by the Corporation with respect to any such action taken or determination or interpretation made in good faith. The appropriate officers of the Corporation are hereby authorized and empowered to do all things and execute and deliver all instruments, undertakings and applications and writings as they, in their absolute discretion, consider necessary for the implementation of the Plan and of the rules and regulations established for administering the Plan. All costs incurred in connection with the Plan shall be for the account of the Corporation.

 

Section 2.03           Delegation to Committee: All of the powers exercisable hereunder by the Directors may, to the extent permitted by applicable law and as determined by resolution of the Directors, be exercised by a committee of the Board comprised of not less than three Directors, including any compensation committee of the Board.

 

Section 2.04           Record Keeping: The Corporation shall maintain a register in which shall be recorded:

 

(a) the name and address of each Participant;

 

(b) the number of Restricted Share Units granted to each Participant; and

 

(c) the number of Shares (if any) issued to each Participant in settlement of fully vested Restricted Share Units.

 

Section 2.05           Determination of Participants and Participation: The Committee shall from time to time determine the Participants who may participate in the Plan. The Committee shall from time to time determine the Participants to whom Restricted Share Units shall be granted and the provisions and restrictions with respect to such grant(s), all such determinations to be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan, and the Committee may take into consideration the present and potential contributions of and the services rendered by the particular Participant to the success of the Corporation and any other factors which the Committee deems appropriate and relevant.

 

Section 2.06           Maximum Number of Shares:

 

(a) The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares available for issuance from treasury under this Plan, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 5.06, shall not exceed 3,000,000. Under no circumstances may the number of Shares issuable pursuant to Restricted Share Units, together with Shares issuable under all Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, exceed 10% of the total number of Shares then outstanding. For purposes of this Section 2.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non-diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Restricted Share Unit.

 

(b) The maximum number of Restricted Share Units available for grant to any one Person, in a 12 month period pursuant to this Plan and any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, is 5% of the total number of Shares then outstanding. For purposes of this Section 2.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non-diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Restricted Share Unit.

 

C-9

 

 

(c)           The maximum number of Shares which may be issuable at any time to Insiders (as a group) pursuant to this Plan, or together with any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall be 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares at the time of grant. The maximum number of Shares which may be issued within any one year period to Insiders (as a group), pursuant to this Plan, or together with any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall be 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares. For purposes of this Section 2.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non-diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Restricted Share Unit.

 

(d)          The maximum equity value of Restricted Share Units which may be granted to each Director who is not also an Eligible Employee, together with all Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall not exceed $150,000 (based on the Market Value of the Restricted Share Units) in any fiscal year.

 

(e)           For purposes of determining the number of Shares that remain available for issuance under the Plan, the number of Shares underlying any grants of Restricted Share Units that are surrendered, forfeited, waived, repurchased by the Corporation and/or cancelled without the applicable Restricted Period(s) having expired shall be added back to the Plan and again be available for future grant, whereas the number of Shares underlying any grants of Restricted Share Units that are issued shall not be available for future grant.

 

Article Three

RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS

 

Section 3.01         Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan is hereby established for Eligible Employees, Directors and Eligible Consultants.

 

Section 3.02        Grant of Restricted Share Units: The number of Restricted Share Units awarded will be credited to the Participant’s account, effective as of the Grant Date.

 

Section 3.03           Vesting: A Restricted Share Unit Award granted to a Participant will entitle the Participant, subject to the Participant’s satisfaction of any conditions, restrictions or limitations imposed under the Plan or Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter, to receive one previously unissued Share for each Restricted Share Unit at the end of the Restricted Period or, if applicable, at a later Deferred Payment Date, without any further action on the part of the holder of the Restricted Share Unit in accordance with this Article Three; provided, that for a US Participant, the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the end of the Restricted Period and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance. Concurrent with the determination to grant Restricted Share Units to a Participant, the Committee shall determine the vesting schedule (if any) applicable to such Restricted Share Units. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may settle its obligations with respect to any Restricted Share Units by issuing the applicable Shares to the Participant before the expiration of the Restricted Period or Deferred Payment Date.

 

Section 3.04         Restricted Period: Upon the grant of Restricted Share Units to a Participant, the Committee shall determine the Restricted Period applicable to such Restricted Share Units.

 

Section 3.05        Deferred Payment Date: Participants other than US Participants may elect to defer the receipt of all or any part of their entitlement to Restricted Share Units until a Deferred Payment Date.

 

C-10

 

 

Section 3.06        Prior Notice of Deferred Payment Date: Participants who elect to set a Deferred Payment Date must give the Corporation written notice of one or more Deferred Payment Dates not later than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period. Participants may change a Deferred Payment Date by providing written notice to the Corporation not later than thirty (30) days prior to the Deferred Payment Date.

 

Section 3.07        Termination of Employment:

 

(a) Termination with Cause or Resignation without Good Reason during Restricted Period: Except as provided for in the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter or as determined by the Committee in its discretion, upon the Termination of the employment or services of the Participant, for any reason other than death, disability, Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason, then, all Restricted Share Units will be forfeited by the Participant (other than any vested Restricted Share Units that have been deferred prior to such Termination or Resignation, which Restricted Share Units shall be subject to Section 3.07(c)), and be of no further force and effect, as of the date of Termination;

 

(b) Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason during Restricted Period: Except as provided for in the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter or as determined by the Committee in its discretion, provided that the Participant has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation since the Grant Date, in the event of the Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason of a Participant during the Restricted Period, the Corporation shall issue forthwith Shares in accordance with the Restricted Share Units held by the Participant on the date of the Participant’s Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason, notwithstanding any applicable Deferred Payment Date, provided, that for a US Participant, the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the Participant’s Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance;

 

(c) Termination or Resignation after Restricted Period: Except as provided for in the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter or as determined by the Committee in its discretion, provided that the Participant has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation since the Grant Date, in the event of the Termination or Resignation of a Participant following the Restricted Period and prior to the Deferred Payment Date, the Corporation shall issue forthwith Shares in accordance with the Restricted Share Units held by the Participant;

 

(d) Death: Provided that the Participant has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation since the Grant Date, any Shares represented by Restricted Share Units held by the Participant on the date of the Participant’s death shall be immediately issuable by the Corporation, notwithstanding any Deferred Payment Date, provided, that for a US Participant, the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the Participant’s death and provided further, that such Participant’s estate does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance;

 

(e) Disability: Provided that the Participant has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation since the Grant Date, any Shares represented by Restricted Share Units held by the Participant on the date on which the Participant is determined to be totally disabled shall be immediately issuable by the Corporation within 90 days following the date on which the Participant is determined to be totally disabled, notwithstanding any applicable Deferred Payment Date(s), provided, that for a US Participant the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the date on which the Participant is determined to be totally disabled and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance; and

 

C-11

 

 

(f) Change of Control: In the event of (i) a Change of Control, and (ii) within 12 months of such Change of Control the Corporation terminates the employment of the Participant for any reason other than just cause, then all Restricted Share Units outstanding shall immediately vest on the date of such termination and the Corporation shall forthwith issue the Shares to the Participant, notwithstanding any stated vesting period or any applicable Deferred Payment Date(s); provided, that for a US Participant, except as described below in this paragraph, the date of issuance shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the Participant’s termination and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of issuance. In any event, upon a Change of Control, Participants shall not be treated any more favourably than shareholders of the Corporation with respect to the consideration that the Participants would be entitled to receive for their Shares, provided, however, that for a US Participant any issuance must occur in full within five years of the date of the Change of Control.

 

Section 3.08        Redemption - Fully Paid Shares to the Participant: Subject to Section 4.01, the Corporation will satisfy its payment obligation, net of any applicable taxes and other source deductions required to be withheld by the Corporation, at the end of the Restricted Period or, if applicable, on the later Deferred Payment Date, with the issue of fully paid Shares from treasury in accordance with Section 3.03.

 

Section 3.09        Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter: Each grant of a Restricted Share Unit under the Plan shall be evidenced by a Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter issued by the Corporation and agreed to by the Participant. Such Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter shall be subject to all applicable terms and conditions of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms and conditions which are not inconsistent with the Plan and which the Committee deems appropriate for inclusion in a Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter. The provisions of the various Restricted Share Unit Grant Letters issued under the Plan need not be identical. To the extent that there is any inconsistency between the Plan and the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter or any other communications, the Plan shall prevail.

 

Section 3.10       Payment of Dividends: Subject to the absolute discretion of the Committee, in the event that a dividend (other than a stock dividend) is declared and paid by the Corporation on Shares, the Committee may elect to credit each Participant with additional Restricted Share Units. In such case, the number of additional Restricted Share Units will be equal to the aggregate amount of dividends that would have been paid to the Participant if the Restricted Share Units in the Participant’s account had been Shares, divided by the Market Value of a Share on the date on which dividends were paid by the Corporation. The additional Restricted Share Units awarded to a Participant under this Section 3.10 of this Plan will vest upon the expiry of the Restricted Period or, if applicable, on the later Deferred Payment Date, in respect of the particular Restricted Share Unit Award to which the additional Restricted Share Units relate.

 

Section 3.11       Blackout: Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, in the event that any Restricted Period expires or, if applicable, any Deferred Payment Date occurs during, or within 48 hours after, a self-imposed blackout period on the trading of securities of the Corporation, such Restricted Period or Deferred Payment Date shall be automatically extended until 48 hours after such blackout period has expired.

 

Section 3.12           Necessary Approvals: The Plan shall be subject to the approval of the shareholders of the Corporation to be given by a resolution passed at a meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation and acceptance by the TSX or any regulatory authority having jurisdiction over the securities of the Corporation.

 

C-12

 

 

Article Four

TAX MATTERS

 

Section 4.01           Withholding Taxes: The Corporation or its Affiliates may take such steps as are considered necessary or appropriate for the withholding of any taxes which the Corporation or its Affiliate is required by any law or regulation of any governmental authority whatsoever to withhold in connection with any delivery of Shares made under this Plan including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the withholding of all or any portion of any payment or the withholding of the issue of Shares to be issued under the Plan, until such time as the Participant has paid the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation for any amount which the Corporation and its Affiliates are required to withhold with respect to such taxes. For greater certainty, immediately upon delivery of any Shares, the Corporation shall have the right to require that a Participant sell a given number of Shares sufficient to cover any applicable withholding taxes and any other source deductions to be withheld by the Corporation in connection with payments made in satisfaction of the Participant’s vested Restricted Share Units.

 

Article Five

GENERAL

 

Section 5.01           Effective Time of Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan shall be effective on April 2, 2020.

 

Section 5.02           Amendment of Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Board or the Committee, as the case may be, may terminate, discontinue or amend the Plan at any time, provided that, without the consent of a Participant, such termination, discontinuance or amendment may not in any manner adversely affect such Participant’s rights under any Restricted Share Unit granted to such Participant under the Plan.

 

The Board or the Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory and shareholder approval, make the following amendments to the Plan or Restricted Share Units under the Plan:

 

(a) amendments to increase the number of Shares, other than by virtue of Section 5.06, which may be issued pursuant to the Plan;

 

(b) amendments to the definition of “Participant” under the Plan which would have the potential of narrowing, broadening or increasing Insider participation;’

 

(c) amendments to cancel and reissue Restricted Share Units;

 

(d) amendments to this Section 5.02 of the Plan;

 

(e) amendments that extend the term of a Restricted Share Units;

 

(f) amendments to the participation limits in Section 2.06; or

 

(g) amendments to Section 5.03 of the Plan that would permit Restricted Share Units, or any other right or interest of a Participant under the Plan, to be assigned or transferred, other than for normal estate settlement purposes.

 

C-13

 

 

The Board or the Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory approval (where required), but not subject to shareholder approval, in its sole discretion make all other amendments to the Plan or Restricted Share Units under the Plan that are not of the type contemplated above, including, without limitation:

 

(a) amendments of a housekeeping nature;

 

(b) amendments to the vesting provisions of a Restricted Share Unit or the Plan;

 

(c) amendments to the definitions, other than such definitions noted above;

 

(d) amendments to reflect changes to applicable securities laws; and

 

(e) amendments to ensure that the Restricted Share Units granted under the Plan will comply with any provisions respecting income tax and other laws in force in any country or jurisdiction of which a Participant to whom a Restricted Share Unit has been granted may from time to time be a resident, citizen or otherwise subject to tax therein.

 

Section 5.03       Non-Assignable: Except as otherwise may be expressly provided for under this Plan or pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution, no Restricted Share Unit and no other right or interest of a Participant is assignable or transferable, and any such assignment or transfer in violation of this Plan shall be null and void.

 

Section 5.04        Rights as a Shareholder: No holder of any Restricted Share Units shall have any rights as a shareholder of the Corporation prior to the actual receipt of Shares pursuant to Section 3.03. Subject to Section 5.06, no holder of any Restricted Share Units shall be entitled to receive, and no adjustment shall be made for, any dividends, distributions or any other rights declared for shareholders of the Corporation for which the record date is prior to the date on which the Participant becomes the record owner of such Shares pursuant to Section 3.03.

 

Section 5.05        No Contract of Employment: Nothing contained in the Plan shall confer or be deemed to confer upon any Participant the right to continue in the employment of, or to provide services to, the Corporation or its Affiliates nor interfere or be deemed to interfere in any way with any right of the Corporation or its Affiliates to discharge any Participant at any time for any reason whatsoever, with or without just cause. Participation in the Plan by a Participant shall be voluntary.

 

Section 5.06        Adjustment in Number of Shares Subject to the Restricted Share Unit Plan: In the event there is any change in the Shares, whether by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification, an appropriate adjustment shall be made by the Committee in:

 

(a) the number of Shares available under the Plan; and

 

(b) the number of Shares subject to any Restricted Share Units.

 

If the foregoing adjustment shall result in a fractional Share, the fraction shall be disregarded. All such adjustments shall be conclusive, final and binding for all purposes of the Plan.

 

However, if there is an increase in the number of Shares outstanding for any reason other than by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification as described above (for example, as a result of a private placement of Shares or the issuance of Shares in connection with the acquisition of an asset) there will be no adjustment to the number of Shares that a Participant will receive under his or her Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter award and no adjustment to the number of Shares available under the Plan.

 

Section 5.07        Unfunded Plan. The Plan shall be unfunded. The Corporation’s obligations hereunder shall (unless otherwise determined by the Committee) constitute a general, unsecured obligation, payable solely out of its general assets, and no holder of any Restricted Share Units or other person shall have any right to any specific assets of the Corporation. Neither the Corporation nor the Committee shall be required to segregate any assets that may at any time be represented by the amounts credited with respect to Restricted Share Units hereunder. Neither the Corporation nor the Committee shall be deemed to be a trustee of any amounts to be distributed or paid pursuant to the Plan. No liability or obligation of the Corporation pursuant to the Plan shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge of, or encumbrance on, any property of the Corporation or any Affiliate.

 

C-14

 

 

Section 5.08        No Representation or Warranty: The Corporation makes no representation or warranty as to the future Market Value of any Shares issued in accordance with the provisions of the Plan. No amount will be paid to, or in respect of, a Participant under this Plan or pursuant to any other arrangement, and no additional Restricted Share Units will be granted to such Participant to compensate for a downward fluctuation in the price of the Shares, nor will any other form of benefit be conferred upon, or in respect of, a Participant for such purpose.

 

Section 5.09        Compliance with Applicable Law: If any provision of the Plan or any Restricted Share Unit contravenes any law or any order, policy, by-law or regulation of any regulatory body having jurisdiction, then such provision shall be deemed to be amended to the extent necessary to bring such provision into compliance therewith.

 

Section 5.10        Interpretation: This Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia.

 

C-15

 

 

 

Form of Grant Letter

 

[ORLA MINING LTD. LETTERHEAD]

  

[Date]

 

PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL

 

[Name]

 

[Address]

 

Dear [Name]:

 

The Corporation’s Restricted Share Unit Plan (the “Plan”) permits the Board, or a committee of the Board which administers the Plan, to grant restricted share unit awards to directors, consultants and full-time employees and officers of the Corporation or an affiliate in a calendar year as a bonus for services rendered to the Corporation or an affiliate in the fiscal year ending in such calendar year, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Board or such committee. The number of restricted share units (“RSUs”) awarded will be credited to your account effective on the grant date of the RSUs.

 

In recognition of your contribution to the Corporation, the Board is pleased to grant to you the RSUs on the terms set forth below and subject to the Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Schedule “A”.

 

This letter and the Plan are referred to collectively below as the “Restricted Share Unit Documents”. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning attributed to them in the Plan.

 

The total number of RSUs granted to you is:  

[Note: insert number]

 

     

Notwithstanding the foregoing and subject to Sections 3.03 of the Plan, provided that your employment (if applicable) with the Corporation has not been terminated, the RSUs granted to you shall fully vest on the following schedule l.

 

[NTD: Consider any other conditions in addition to time-based vesting.]

 

In the event of vesting pursuant to the schedule above, subject to the Plan, you shall receive in respect of each RSU held by you one fully-paid common share in the capital of the Corporation without payment of additional consideration and without any further action on your part.

 

C-16

 

 

Nothing in the Restricted Share Unit Documents will affect our right to terminate your services, responsibilities, duties and authority at any time for any reason whatsoever. The treatment of your RSUs upon termination or other events is detailed herein and in the Plan.

 

No RSU and no other right or interest of a Participant hereunder is assignable or transferable.

 

Please acknowledge acceptance of your RSUs and agreement to these terms by signing where indicated below on the enclosed copy of this letter and returning the signed copy to the Corporation to the attention of l. By signing and delivering this copy, you are acknowledging receipt of a copy of the Plan and are agreeing to be bound by all of the terms of the Restricted Share Unit Documents.

 

  Yours truly,
   
  ORLA MINING LTD.
    
  By:         

 

I have read and agree to be bound by this letter and the Plan.

 

   
Signature of Witness  
  [Name]
Name of Witness (please print)  
   
     
     
    Address

   

C-17

 

 

Schedule “D”

 

AUDITOR CHANGE REPORTING PACKAGE

 

 

D-1

 

 

 

 

March 27, 2020

 

British Columbia Securities Commission

Alberta Securities Commission

Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan

The Manitoba Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

Autorite des Marches Financiers

Financial and Consumer Services Commission

Nova Scotia Securities Commission

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Prince Edward Island

Registrar of Securities, Government of the Northwest Territories

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Nunavut

 

Dear Sirs / Mesdames

 

Re:     Orla Mining Ltd. (the "Company")

            Notice Pursuant to NI 51 – 102 of Change of Auditor

 

In accordance with National Instrument 51-102, we have read the Company’s Change of Auditor Notice dated March 25, 2020 and agree with the information contained therein, based upon our knowledge of the information at this date.

 

Should you require clarification or further information, please do not hesitate to contact the writer.

 

Yours very truly,

 

 

 

DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants

 

cc: Toronto Stock Exchange

 

 

 

D-2

 

 

 

British Columbia Securities Commission (Principal Regulator) March 30, 2020

Alberta Securities Commission

Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan

The Manitoba Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

Autorité des Marchés Financiers

Financial and Consumer Services Commission, New Brunswick

Nova Scotia Securities Commission

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Prince Edward Island

Registrar of Securities, Government of Yukon

Superintendent of Securities, Government of the Northwest Territories

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Nunavut

 

Orla Mining Ltd. Change of Auditor Notice dated March 30, 2020

 

 

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

 

D-3

 

 

 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF AUDITOR

 

TO:                      DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP

 

AND TO:            ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

CC:                       British Columbia Securities Commission (Principal Regulator)

Alberta Securities Commission

Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan

The Manitoba Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

Autorité des Marchés Financiers

Financial and Consumer Services Commission, New Brunswick

Nova Scotia Securities Commission

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Prince Edward Island

Registrar of Securities, Government of Yukon

Superintendent of Securities, Government of the Northwest Territories

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Nunavut

 

TAKE NOTICE THAT Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”) hereby provides notice pursuant to National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations (“NI 51-102”) of a change of auditors from Davidson & Company LLP (“Davidson”) to Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) effective March 25, 2020.

 

TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT:

 

1. At the request of the Corporation, Davidson, resigned as auditor of the Corporation effective March 25, 2020 and E&Y has been appointed as auditor of the Corporation effective March 25, 2020.

 

2. The resignation of Davidson and the appointment of E&Y in its place have been recommended by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board”) and approved by the Board.

 

3. Davidson did not express a modified opinion in any of its reports for: (a) the audits of the two most recently completed financial years of the Corporation; or (b) any period subsequent to the two most recently completed financial years of the Corporation and ending on March 25, 2020.

 

4. There are no reportable events (as defined under Section 4.11(1) of NI 51-102).

 

5. The Corporation has requested E&Y and Davidson to each furnish a letter addressed to the securities administrators in each province in which the Corporation is a reporting issuer stating whether or not they agree with the information contained in this notice. A copy of each such letter to the securities administrators will be filed with this notice.

 

DATED as of this 27th day of March 2020.

 

  ORLA MINING LTD.
   
  (signed) “Etienne Morin”
  Name: Etienne Morin
  Title: Chief Financial Officer

 

D-4

 

 

Exhibit 99.21

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

8th Floor, 100 University Avenue

Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Y1

www.computershare.com

 

Security Class

 

Holder Account Number

 

Fold

 

 

 

This Form of Proxy is solicited by and on behalf of Management.

 

Notes to proxy

 

1. Every holder has the right to appoint some other person or company of their choice, who need not be a holder, to attend and act on their behalf at the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. If you wish to appoint a person or company other than the persons whose names are printed herein, please insert the name of your chosen proxyholder in the space provided (see reverse).

 

2  If the securities are registered in the name of more than one owner (for example, joint ownership, trustees, executors, etc.), then all those registered should sign this proxy. If you are voting on behalf of a corporation or another individual you must sign this proxy with signing capacity stated, and you may be required to provide documentation evidencing your power to sign this proxy.

 

3. This proxy should be signed in the exact manner as the name(s) appear(s) on the proxy.

 

4. If this proxy is not dated, it will be deemed to bear the date on which it is mailed by Management to the holder.

 

5. The securities represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the holder, however, if such a direction is not made in respect of any matter, this proxy will be voted as recommended by Management.

 

6. The securities represented by this proxy will be voted in favour or withheld from voting or voted against each of the matters described herein, as applicable, in accordance with the instructions of the holder, on any ballot that may be called for and, if the holder has specified a choice with respect to any matter to be acted on, the securities will be voted accordingly.

 

7. This proxy confers discretionary authority in respect of amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting or other matters that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Fold

 

8. This proxy should be read in conjunction with the accompanying documentation provided by Management.

 

Proxies submitted must be received by 9:00 am, Vancouver Time, on Monday, May 11, 2020

 

VOTE USING THE TELEPHONE OR INTERNET 24 HOURS A DAY 7 DAYS A WEEK!

 

         

Call the number listed BELOW from a touch tone telephone.

1-866-732-VOTE (8683) Toll Free

 

 

Go to the following web site:

www.investorvote.com

Smartphone?

Scan the QR code to vote now.

 

  You can attend the meeting virtually by visiting the URL provided on the back of this proxy.

 

If you vote by telephone or the Internet, DO NOT mail back this proxy.

 

Voting by mail may be the only method for securities held in the name of a corporation or securities being voted on behalf of another individual.

Voting by mail or by Internet are the only methods by which a holder may appoint a person as proxyholder other than the Management nominees named on the reverse of this proxy. Instead of mailing this proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined above to vote this proxy.

 

To vote by telephone or the Internet, you will need to provide your CONTROL NUMBER listed below.

 

CONTROL NUMBER 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appointment of Proxyholder
I/We being holder(s) of Orla Mining Ltd. hereby appoint(s):
Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, or failing him, Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation              
OR Print the name of the person you are
appointing if this person is someone
other than the Chairman of the Meeting.
   

 

as my/our proxyholder with full power of substitution and to attend, act and to vote for and on behalf of the shareholder in accordance with the following direction (or if no directions have been given, as the proxyholder sees fit) and all other matters that may properly come before the Annual General and Special Meeting of shareholders of the Corporation to be held via live webcast at https://78449.themediaframe.com/dataconf/productusers/ola/mediaframe/37060/indexl.html on Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 9:00 am (Vancouver time) and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS ARE INDICATED BY HIGHLIGHTED TEXT OVER THE BOXES.

 

1. Election of Directors

 

                   
For Withhold   For Withhold   For Withhold  
                   
01. Charles Jeannes 02. Richard Hall 03. Jason Simpson  
                  Fold
04. Jean Robitaille 05. George Albino 06. Tim Haldane  
                   
07. David Stephens 08. Elizabeth McGregor        

 

For Withhold  
2. Appointment of Auditors      
Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Auditor of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorizing the Directors to fix their remuneration.  

 

  For Against  
3. Adoption of Replacement Restricted Share Unit Plan      
To consider, and if deemed advisable, to pass an ordinary resolution to approve the adoption of a new restricted share unit plan of the Corporation, as more particularly described in the accompanying management information circular.   

 

Fold

 

 

  Signature(s) Date
Authorized Signature(s) – This section must be completed for your
instructions to be executed.

I/We authorize you to act in accordance with my/our instructions set out above. I/We hereby
revoke any proxy previously given with respect to the Meeting. If no voting instructions are
indicated above, this Proxy will be voted as recommended by Management.
   

 

 

Annual Financial Statements – Mark this box if
you would NOT like to receive the Annual Financial
Statements and accompanying Management’s Discussion
and Analysis by mail.

 

If you are not mailing back your proxy, you may register online to receive the above financial report(s) by mail at www.computershare.com/mailinglist.

 

R D M Q 295202 A R 5

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.22

 

   
NEWS RELEASE

 

ORLA MINING APPOINTS ANDREW CORMIER AS CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

 

VANCOUVER, BC – April 9, 2020 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the "Company") is pleased to announce that Andrew Cormier has been appointed as Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) and will be joining the Orla executive team effective April 16, 2020. Mr. Cormier succeeds Mr. Hans Smit who retired in December 2019 as COO of the company, while remaining with the Company as a consultant.

 

“We are excited that Andrew has decided to join Orla as we enter our next phase of growth. Andrew’s extensive construction and operating experience will be a great asset as we build our first gold mine in Mexico. We continue to emphasize a culture based on care and capability, and Andrew’s style and experience will be a great complement to the team”, commented Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive of Orla.

 

Mr. Cormier has over 27 years of experience in the mining industry and was previously the Vice President of Development and Construction at Alamos Gold Inc. for the past seven years. Prior to that, he served as Project Manager at AuRico Gold, where he advanced development of the Young-Davidson mine. During his career, Mr. Cormier has worked for Noranda Inc, Barrick Gold Corporation, SNC-Lavalin and Cambior Limited. He graduated with a B.Eng. degree in Extractive Metallurgical Engineering from Laurentian University and received a Diploma in Technology, Management and Entrepreneurship from the University of New Brunswick. He is a licensed professional engineer in Ontario.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 160,000 hectares. The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

1

 

 

   
NEWS RELEASE

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the use of proceeds from the Offering, the results of exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources and the Company’s objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions that all approvals of the Offering will be obtained, the Company’s activities will be in accordance with the Company’s public statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required approvals will be obtained and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of preliminary economic assessments, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources; and risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson
President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

www.orlamining.com
info@orlamining.com

 

2

 

 

Exhibit 99.23 

 

 

 

March 27, 2020

 

British Columbia Securities Commission

Alberta Securities Commission

Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan

The Manitoba Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

Autorite des Marches Financiers

Financial and Consumer Services Commission

Nova Scotia Securities Commission

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Prince Edward Island

Registrar of Securities, Government of the Northwest Territories

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Nunavut

 

Dear Sirs / Mesdames

 

Re:     Orla Mining Ltd. (the "Company")

            Notice Pursuant to NI 51 – 102 of Change of Auditor

 

In accordance with National Instrument 51-102, we have read the Company’s Change of Auditor Notice dated March 25, 2020 and agree with the information contained therein, based upon our knowledge of the information at this date.

 

Should you require clarification or further information, please do not hesitate to contact the writer.

 

Yours very truly,

 

 

 

DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants

 

cc: Toronto Stock Exchange

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.24

 

 

British Columbia Securities Commission (Principal Regulator) March 30, 2020

Alberta Securities Commission

Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan

The Manitoba Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

Autorité des Marchés Financiers

Financial and Consumer Services Commission, New Brunswick

Nova Scotia Securities Commission

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Prince Edward Island

Registrar of Securities, Government of Yukon

Superintendent of Securities, Government of the Northwest Territories

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Nunavut

 

Orla Mining Ltd. Change of Auditor Notice dated March 30, 2020

 

 

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.25

 

 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF AUDITOR

 

TO:                      DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP

 

AND TO:            ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

CC:                       British Columbia Securities Commission (Principal Regulator)

Alberta Securities Commission

Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan

The Manitoba Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

Autorité des Marchés Financiers

Financial and Consumer Services Commission, New Brunswick

Nova Scotia Securities Commission

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Prince Edward Island

Registrar of Securities, Government of Yukon

Superintendent of Securities, Government of the Northwest Territories

Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of Nunavut

 

TAKE NOTICE THAT Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”) hereby provides notice pursuant to National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations (“NI 51-102”) of a change of auditors from Davidson & Company LLP (“Davidson”) to Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) effective March 25, 2020.

 

TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT:

 

1. At the request of the Corporation, Davidson, resigned as auditor of the Corporation effective March 25, 2020 and E&Y has been appointed as auditor of the Corporation effective March 25, 2020.

 

2. The resignation of Davidson and the appointment of E&Y in its place have been recommended by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board”) and approved by the Board.

 

3. Davidson did not express a modified opinion in any of its reports for: (a) the audits of the two most recently completed financial years of the Corporation; or (b) any period subsequent to the two most recently completed financial years of the Corporation and ending on March 25, 2020.

 

4. There are no reportable events (as defined under Section 4.11(1) of NI 51-102).

 

5. The Corporation has requested E&Y and Davidson to each furnish a letter addressed to the securities administrators in each province in which the Corporation is a reporting issuer stating whether or not they agree with the information contained in this notice. A copy of each such letter to the securities administrators will be filed with this notice.

 

DATED as of this 27th day of March 2020.

 

  ORLA MINING LTD.
   
  (signed) “Etienne Morin”
  Name: Etienne Morin
  Title: Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.26

 

MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT
UNDER NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 51-102

 

Item 1 Name and Address of Company

 

Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Company”)
Suite 202 - 595 Howe Street
Vancouver, British Columbia

V6C 2T5

 

Item 2 Date of Material Change

 

March 26, 2020

 

Item 3 News Release

 

A news release with respect to the material change referred to in this report was disseminated by the Company on March 26, 2020 through Newswire and was subsequently filed on SEDAR.

 

Item 4 Summary of Material Change

 

On March 26, 2020, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement with a syndicate of underwriters led by Stifel Nicolaus Canada Inc. (“Stifel GMP”), pursuant to which the Underwriters (as defined below) agreed to buy, on a bought deal basis, 36,600,000 common shares of the Company (the “Common Shares”) at a price of C$2.05 (the “Offering Price”) per Common Share for gross proceeds to the Company of C$75,030,000 (the “Offering”). On March 30, 2020, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Stifel GMP, Desjardins Securities Inc., Paradigm Capital Inc. and Cormark Securities Inc. (together with Stifel GMP, the “Underwriters”) with respect to the Offering.

 

On April 3, 2020, the Company announced that it had closed the Offering and that the Underwriters had provided notice that the Over-Allotment Option would not be exercised.

 

Item 5 Full Description of Material Change

 

On March 26, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement with a syndicate of underwriters led by Stifel GMP, and on March 30, 2020, the Company entered into the Underwriting Agreement with respect to the Offering. Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the Company granted the Underwriters an option, exercisable in whole or in part, at the Offering Price for a period of 30 days following the closing of the Offering, to purchase up to an additional 5,490,000 Common Shares sold under the Offering (the “Over-Allotment Option”) to cover over-allotments, if any, and for market stabilization purposes.

 

On April 3, 2020, the Company closed the Offering. A total of 36,600,000 Common Shares were sold at a price of C$2.05 per Common Share, for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of C$75,030,000 and the Underwriters notified the Company that the Over-Allotment Option would not be exercised.

 

The net proceeds from the Offering will be used for the development and construction activities at the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, projected payments related to the proposed layback agreement with Fresnillo plc, and for general corporate purposes (as more fully described in the prospectus supplement (the “Prospectus Supplement”) dated March 30, 2020).

 

The Common Shares were qualified for distribution pursuant to the Prospectus Supplement and a short form base shelf prospectus dated March 11, 2019, filed in each of the provinces and territories of Canada, except Québec, and offered and sold elsewhere outside of Canada on a private placement basis.

 

- 2 -

 

This material change report shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in the United States, nor shall there be any sale of the securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful. The securities offered have not been, nor will they be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) or any U.S. state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act, as amended, and applicable state securities laws.

 

Multilateral Instrument 61-101

 

Newmont Corporation (“Newmont”) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”) each subscribed for such number of Common Shares under the Offering so as to maintain their current ownership positions of approximately 18.4% and 9.4%, respectively.

 

Messrs. Jason Simpson, Jean Robitaille, George Albino, Chuck Jeannes and David Stephens and Ms. Elizabeth McGregor are directors or officers of the Company, and Newmont, Agnico Eagle and Mr. Pierre Lassonde are insiders of the Company, and subscribed for an aggregate of 16,600,900 Common Shares. Such participation in the Offering constitutes a related party transaction for the purposes of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (“MI 61-101”). The Common Shares issued to such insiders did not result in a material change to their respective shareholdings. The Offering, including the participation of the insiders and issuance of Common Shares in connection therewith, was considered, and ultimately approved by the board of directors of the Company on March 30, 2020. The directors who participated in the Offering declared and disclosed their interest and did not vote on the matter. The Company is relying on the exemption from the formal valuation and minority approval requirements set out in sections 5.5(a) and 5.7(a) of MI 61-101 as the fair market value insofar as it relates to interested parties is not more than 25% of Orla’s market capitalization.

 

Item 6 Reliance on subsection 7.1(2) of National Instrument 51-102

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 7 Omitted Information

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 8 Executive Officer

 

For further information contact Etienne Morin at (604) 564-1852.

 

Item 9 Date of Report

 

DATED as of this 6th day of April, 2020.

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This material change report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the use of proceeds from the Offering, the results of exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources and the Company’s objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this material change report, including without limitation, assumptions that all approvals of the Offering will be obtained, the Company’s activities will be in accordance with the Company’s public statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required approvals will be obtained and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of preliminary economic assessments, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources; and risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.27

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES

 

ORLA MINING ANNOUNCES CLOSING OF C$75,030,000 BOUGHT DEAL FINANCING

 

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, April 3, 2020 -- Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX:OLA) (the “Company” or “Orla”) is pleased to announce that it has closed its previously announced bought deal financing with a syndicate of underwriters led by Stifel GMP and including Desjardins Capital Markets, Paradigm Capital and Cormark Securities Inc. (the “Underwriters”). A total of 36,600,000 common shares (the “Common Shares”) of Orla were fully subscribed and sold at a price of C$2.05 per Common Share (the “Offering Price”), for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of C$75,030,000 (the “Offering”).

 

The net proceeds from the Offering will be used for the development and construction activities at the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, projected payments related to the proposed layback agreement with Fresnillo Plc, and for general corporate purposes (as more fully described in the prospectus supplement (the “Prospectus Supplement”) dated March 30, 2020).

 

The Common Shares were qualified for distribution pursuant to the Prospectus Supplement and a short form base shelf prospectus (the “Base Shelf Prospectus”) dated March 11, 2019, filed in each of the provinces and territories of Canada, except Québec, and offered and sold elsewhere outside of Canada on a private placement basis.

 

In conjunction with the closing of the Offering, the Underwriters have given notice to the Company that the over-allotment option will not be exercised.

 

Multilateral Instrument 61-101

 

Newmont Corporation (“Newmont”) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”) each subscribed for such number of Common Shares under the Offering so as to maintain their current ownership positions of approximately 18.4% and 9.4%, respectively.

 

Messrs. Jason Simpson, Jean Robitaille, George Albino, Chuck Jeannes and David Stephens and Ms. Elizabeth McGregor are directors or officers of the Company, and Newmont, Agnico Eagle and Mr. Pierre Lassonde are insiders of the Company, and subscribed for an aggregate of 16,600,900 Common Shares. Such participation in the Offering constitutes a related party transaction for the purposes of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (“MI 61-101”). The Company is relying on the exemption from the formal valuation and minority approval requirements set out in sections 5.5(a) and 5.7(a) of MI 61-101 as the fair market value insofar as it relates to interested parties is not more than 25% of Orla’s market capitalization. The Company did not file a material change report 21 days prior to closing of the Offering as the participation of insiders of the Company in the Offering had not been confirmed at that time.

 

1

 

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in the United States, nor shall there be any sale of the securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful. The securities offered have not been, nor will they be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) or any U.S. state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act, as amended, and applicable state securities laws.

 

The Prospectus Supplement, Base Shelf Prospectus, and the documents incorporated by reference therein, are available on the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

Update on COVID-19 Pandemic

 

The Government of Mexico has followed the pattern of other nations and on April 1, 2020 implemented a 30-day suspension of all non-essential services until April 30, 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

Prior to this suspension, Orla had not yet started construction mobilization activities and site personnel were already reduced as a precaution. Nearly all activities are continuing remotely, as planned, including detailed engineering, procurement, and other functions that can continue to operate safely with distancing. Site activities are expected to resume when approved and safe to do so, including the start of construction as planned early in the second half of 2020. As a result of this 30-day suspension, Orla expects a delay relating to the receipt of its final environmental permit as government agencies also comply with the suspension.  Orla had built contingency in the construction schedule for “unknown factors” and at this point does not expect any material impacts to the business.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 160,000 hectares. The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

2

 

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the use of proceeds from the Offering, the results of exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources and the Company’s objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions that all approvals of the Offering will be obtained, the Company’s activities will be in accordance with the Company’s public statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required approvals will be obtained and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of preliminary economic assessments, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources; and risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson
President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

www.orlamining.com
info@orlamining.com

 

3

 

Exhibit 99.28

 

Date: April 03, 2020 510 Burrard St,
3rd Floor Vancouver BC, V6C 3B9
www.computershare.com

 

To: All Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities

 

Subject: ORLA MINING LTD.

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

We advise of the following with respect to the upcoming Meeting of Security Holders for the subject Issuer:

 

Meeting Type : Annual General and Special Meeting
Record Date for Notice of Meeting : April 02, 2020
Record Date for Voting (if applicable) : April 02, 2020
Beneficial Ownership Determination Date : April 02, 2020
Meeting Date : May 13, 2020
Meeting Location (if available) : Virtual Meeting (AMENDED)
Issuer sending proxy related materials directly to NOBO: No
Issuer paying for delivery to OBO: No
   
Notice and Access (NAA) Requirements:
NAA for Beneficial Holders No
NAA for Registered Holders No

 

Voting Security Details:

 

Description CUSIP Number ISIN
COMMON SHARES 68634K106 CA68634K1066

 

Sincerely,

 

Computershare

Agent for ORLA MINING LTD.

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.29 

 

No securities regulatory authority has expressed an opinion about these securities and it is an offence to claim otherwise. This prospectus supplement together with the short form base shelf prospectus dated March 11, 2019 to which it relates, as amended or supplemented and each document incorporated by reference into the base shelf prospectus for purposes of the distribution of the securities to which this prospectus supplement pertains constitutes a public offering of these securities only in those jurisdictions where they may be lawfully offered for sale and therein only by persons permitted to sell such securities.

 

Information has been incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and in the accompanying short form base shelf prospectus dated March 11, 2019 to which it relates, from documents filed with securities commissions or similar authorities in Canada. Copies of the documents incorporated herein by reference may be obtained on request without charge from the Corporate Secretary of Orla Mining Ltd. at Suite 202 - 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2T5, telephone (604) 564-1852, and are also available electronically at www.sedar.com or on Orla Mining Ltd.’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

The securities offered hereby have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”), or any state securities laws. The securities may not be offered or sold in or to, or for the account or benefit of, persons in the United States of America, its territories and possessions, any state of the United States or the District of Columbia (collectively, the “United States” or “U.S.”) or U.S. persons (as such term is defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act (“U.S. Persons”)) unless exemptions from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws are available and to the extent permitted by the Underwriting Agreement (as defined herein). This prospectus supplement does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of the securities offered hereby within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of persons within the United States or U.S. Persons. See “Plan of Distribution”.

 

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019)

 

New Issue March 30, 2020

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

C$75,030,000
36,600,000 Common Shares

 

This prospectus supplement (the “Prospectus Supplement”), together with the accompanying short form base shelf prospectus dated March 11, 2019 (the “Base Shelf Prospectus” and together with the Prospectus Supplement, the “Prospectus”) qualifies the distribution (the “Offering”) of 36,600,000 common shares (the “Offered Shares”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (“Orla” or the “Corporation”) at a price of C$2.05 per Offered Share (the “Offering Price”). The Offering is being made pursuant to an underwriting agreement dated March 30, 2020 (the “Underwriting Agreement”) among the Corporation and Stifel Nicolaus Canada Inc. as lead underwriter (the “Lead Underwriter”), together with Desjardins Securities Inc., Paradigm Capital Inc. and Cormark Securities Inc. (together with the Lead Underwriter, the “Underwriters”), pursuant to which the Offered Shares will be offered for sale in all provinces and territories in Canada (other than Québec) through the Underwriters in accordance with the terms of the Underwriting Agreement. The Offering Price has been determined by arm’s length negotiation between the Corporation and the Underwriters, with reference to the prevailing market price of the common shares of the Corporation (the “Common Shares”).

 

The outstanding Common Shares are listed and posted for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the symbol “OLA”. The Corporation has applied to the TSX for approval of the listing of the Offered Shares. Listing will be subject to the Corporation fulfilling all of the listing requirements of the TSX. On March 26, 2020, the last trading day prior to the announcement of the Offering, the closing price per Common Share on the TSX was C$2.20.

 

 

 

  Price: C$2.05 per Offered Share  

 

    Price to Public     Underwriters’ Commission (1)(4)     Proceeds to the Corporation (2)(4)  
Per Offered Share   C$ 2.05     C$ 0.10     C$ 1.95  
Total Offering (3)(4)   C$ 75,030,000     C$ 2,390,226     C$ 72,289,774  

 

Notes:
(1) In consideration for the services rendered by the Underwriters in connection with the Offering, the Corporation has agreed to pay the Underwriters a cash fee (the “Underwriters’ Commission”) equal to 5.0% of the gross proceeds of the Offering (including in respect of any exercise of the Over-Allotment Option (as defined herein)), other than in respect of sales to Newmont Corporation, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited, Pierre Lassonde, Trinity Capital Partners Corporation and certain directors and officers of the Corporation (collectively, the “Key Shareholders”), on which a cash fee equal to 1.0% will be paid. See “Plan of Distribution”.
(2) After deducting the Underwriters’ Commission but before deducting the expenses of the Offering (estimated to be C$350,000), which will be paid by the Corporation from the proceeds of the Offering. The Underwriters’ Commission for the Offering will be deducted from the proceeds from the Offering.
(3) The Corporation has granted to the Underwriters an option (the “Over-Allotment Option”), exercisable in whole or in part in the sole discretion of the Underwriter for a period of 30 days from and including the Closing Date (as defined herein), to purchase up to an additional 5,490,000 Common Shares (the “Over-Allotment Shares”) on the same terms as set forth above solely to cover over-allocations, if any, and for market stabilization purposes. If the Over-Allotment Option is exercised in full, the total “Price to the Public”, “Underwriters’ Commission” and “Net Proceeds to the Corporation” will be C$86,284,500, C$2,827,836 and C$83,106,664 respectively. The Prospectus also qualifies the grant of the Over-Allotment Option and the distribution of Over-Allotment Shares. A purchaser who acquires Over-Allotment Shares forming part of the Underwriters’ over-allocation position acquires those Over-Allotment Shares under this Prospectus, regardless of whether the over-allocation position is ultimately filled through the exercise of the Over-Allotment Option or secondary market purchases. See “Plan of Distribution”.
(4) Assumes a total of 16,600,900 Offered Shares are being purchased by the Key Shareholders (assuming no exercise of the Over-Allotment Option). In the event the Over-Allotment Option is exercised in full and Newmont Corporation and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited decide to participate in the Over-Allotment Option on a pro rata basis, it is expected that the Key Shareholders would purchase an aggregate of approximately 18,126,700 Common Shares.

 

The following table sets out the maximum number of Over-Allotment Shares that may be issued by the Corporation to the Underwriter pursuant to the Over-Allotment Option granted to the Underwriters:

 

Underwriters’ Position   Maximum Size   Exercise Period   Exercise Price
Over-Allotment Option   Option to purchase up to 5,490,000 Common Shares   Up to 30 days from and including the Closing Date   C$2.05 per Over-Allotment Share

 

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to the “Offering” and “Offered Shares” herein includes all Over-Allotment Shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of the Over-Allotment Option.

 

The Underwriters, as principals, conditionally offer the Offered Shares, subject to prior sale, if, as and when issued by the Corporation and accepted by the Underwriters in accordance with the conditions contained in the Underwriting Agreement referred to under “Plan of Distribution” and subject to the approval of certain legal matters on behalf of the Corporation by Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP and on behalf of the Underwriters by Bennett Jones LLP.

 

In connection with this Offering and subject to applicable laws, the Underwriters may over-allocate or effect transactions to stabilize or maintain the market price of the Common Shares. Such transactions, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time. The Underwriters propose to offer the Offered Shares initially at the Offering Price. After the Underwriters have made a reasonable effort to sell all of the Offered Shares at the Offering Price, the price at which the Offered Shares are distributed pursuant to the Prospectus may be decreased and may be further changed from time to time to an amount not greater than the Offering Price, and the compensation realized by the Underwriters will be decreased by the amount that the aggregate price paid by purchasers for the Offered Shares distributed pursuant to the Prospectus is less than the Offering Price. Notwithstanding any reduction by the Underwriters on the Offering Price, the Corporation will still receive the net proceeds stated above. See “Plan of Distribution”.

 

Subscriptions for the Offered Shares will be received subject to rejection or allotment in whole or in part and the right is reserved to close the subscription books at any time without notice. The closing is expected to take place on or about April 3, 2020 or such other date as the Corporation and the Underwriters may agree (the “Closing Date”), but in any event not later than 42 days after the date of this Prospectus Supplement. Other than Offered Shares issued in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. Persons that are “accredited investors” as defined under Regulation D under the U.S. Securities Act (“U.S. Accredited Investors”), which must be in the form of definitive certificates issued to such holders with applicable restrictive legends attached, it is anticipated that the Offered Shares will be issued through the book-entry system, registered in the name of CDS Clearing and Depositary Services Inc. (“CDS”) or its nominee and will be deposited with CDS. Beneficial holders (other than U.S. Accredited Investors) of the Offered Shares will receive only a customer confirmation from the Underwriters, or another registered dealer who is a CDS participant, and from or through whom a beneficial interest in the Offered Shares are acquired. If any Offered Shares are not able to be issued in the book-entry system through CDS in advance of the Closing Date for any reason, then those investors or their designated holders will receive definitive certificates representing their interests in such Offered Shares with restrictive legends, if applicable. For certain restrictions on United States qualified institutional buyers, if any, and further information with respect to issuance of the Offered Shares, discussed above, please see “Plan of Distribution”.

 

S-2

 

 

An investment in the Offered Shares is subject to a number of risks. Investors should review this Prospectus Supplement, together with the Base Shelf Prospectus, in their entirety and carefully consider the risk factors described under “Risk Factors” and the risks identified in the documents incorporated by reference herein before purchasing the Offered Shares.

 

No Canadian securities regulator has approved or disapproved of the securities offered hereby, passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this Prospectus Supplement and the accompanying Base Shelf Prospectus or determined if this Prospectus Supplement and the accompanying Base Shelf Prospectus are truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offence.

 

The registered and head office of the Corporation is located Suite 202 - 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2T5.

 

Mr. Charles Jeannes, Mr. Richard Hall, Mr. George Albino and Mr. Tim Haldane, each a director of the Corporation, and Mr. Carl E. Defilippi, Mr. Matthew D. Gray, Mr. Michael G. Hester, Mr. Fred Brown, Mr. Gene Tortelli, Mr. George Lightwood and Mr. Mark Gorman each a qualified person, reside outside of Canada. Each of Mr. Jeannes, Mr. Hall, Mr. Albino and Mr. Haldane have each appointed Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Suite 2200, 885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3E8 as agent for service of process in Canada. Purchasers are advised that it may not be possible for investors to enforce judgments obtained in Canada against any person that resides outside of Canada, even if the party has appointed an agent for service of process.

 

S-3

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS S-5
CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS S-5
SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION S-7
CURRENCY AND EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION S-7
ELIGIBILITY FOR INVESTMENT S-7
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE S-8
MARKETING MATERIALS S-8
THE CORPORATION S-9
USE OF PROCEEDS S-10
CONSOLIDATED CAPITALIZATION OF THE CORPORATION S-11
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION S-11
PRIOR SALES S-14
TRADING PRICE AND VOLUME S-15
RISK FACTORS S-15
LEGAL MATTERS S-18
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR S-18
INTEREST OF EXPERTS S-19
CERTIFICATE OF THE CORPORATION C-1
CERTIFICATE OF THE UNDERWRITERS C-2

 

BASE SHELF PROSPECTUS

 

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS 2
FINANCIAL INFORMATION 2
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION 2
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 4
THE CORPORATION 5
RISK FACTORS 6
CONSOLIDATED CAPITALIZATION 7
USE OF PROCEEDS 7
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION 8
EARNINGS COVERAGE RATIOS 9
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES 9
PRIOR SALES 14
PRICE RANGE AND TRADING VOLUMES 14
CERTAIN CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES 14
LEGAL MATTERS 14
INTEREST OF EXPERTS 14
STATUTORY RIGHTS OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESCISSION 15
CERTIFICATE OF THE CORPORATION 17

 

S-4

 

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS

 

This document is in two parts. The first part is this Prospectus Supplement, which describes the terms of the Offered Shares being offered and also adds to and updates information contained in the accompanying Base Shelf Prospectus and the documents incorporated herein and therein. The second part, the accompanying Base Shelf Prospectus, gives more general information, some of which may not apply to the Offered Shares being offered under this Prospectus Supplement. This Prospectus Supplement is deemed to be incorporated by reference into the accompanying Base Shelf Prospectus solely for the purposes of the Offering constituted by this Prospectus Supplement. To the extent there is a conflict between information contained in this Prospectus Supplement and information contained in the accompanying Base Shelf Prospectus or any document incorporated by reference herein or therein, the information in this Prospectus Supplement shall control and you should rely on the information contained in this Prospectus Supplement. However, if any statement in one of these documents is inconsistent with a statement in another document having a later date—for example, a document incorporated by reference into this Prospectus Supplement or the accompanying Base Shelf Prospectus—the statement in the document having the later date modifies or supersedes the earlier statement.

 

Investors should rely only on current information contained in or incorporated by reference into this Prospectus Supplement and the accompanying Base Shelf Prospectus as such information is accurate only as of the date of the applicable document. Orla has not authorized anyone to provide investors with different information. Information contained on Orla’s website shall not be deemed to be a part of this Prospectus Supplement or incorporated by reference and should not be relied upon by prospective investors for the purpose of determining whether to invest in the securities offered hereby.

 

The Corporation will not make an offer of these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. Investors should not assume that the information contained in this Prospectus Supplement is accurate as of any date other than the date on the face page of this Prospectus Supplement or the date of any documents incorporated by reference herein.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, the disclosure in this Prospectus Supplement assumes that the Over-Allotment Option will not be exercised.

 

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Prospectus Supplement to the “Corporation” refer to the Corporation and its subsidiary entities on a consolidated basis.

 

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Prospectus Supplement contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively referred to herein as “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements are included to provide information about management’s current expectations and plans that allows investors and others to get a better understanding of the Corporation’s operating environment, the business operations and financial performance and condition. Forward-looking information is provided as of the date of this Prospectus Supplement and the Corporation does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update this forward-looking information, except as required by law.

 

Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding: the anticipated use of proceeds of the Offering; the timing for completion, settlement and closing of the Offering; the satisfaction of the conditions to closing of the Offering, including receipt in a timely manner of regulatory and other required approvals and clearances, including the approval of the TSX; the plan of distribution for the Offering; terms of and timeline for entering into the proposed Layback Agreement (as defined herein); the expected additional material to be included in a future mine plan as a result of the Layback Agreement; results of a feasibility study unconstrained by the property boundary; terms of and ability to reach a subsequent agreement with Fresnillo (as defined herein) to access the sulphide mineral resource at the Camino Rojo Project (as defined herein); the planned exploration and development programs and expenditures; the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; expectations on the potential extension of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema Project (as defined herein); proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema Project and the Camino Rojo Project; Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits, required agreements with third parties and regulatory approvals required in connection with mining and mineral processing operations, including but not limited to, necessary permitting required to implement expected future exploration plans; community and Ejido relations; availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; competition for, among other things, acquisitions of mineral reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; currency and interest rate fluctuations and the ability to secure the required capital to conduct planned exploration programs, studies and construction. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions)) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

S-5

 

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Corporation at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Corporation’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the future price of gold, anticipated costs and the Corporation’s ability to fund its programs, the Corporation’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities, the Corporation’s ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements, the timing and results of drilling programs, the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Corporation’s mineral properties, the obtaining of an agreement with Fresnillo to develop the entire Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate, the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects, the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, the Corporation’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner and the Corporation’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others: (i) failure to obtain required regulatory and stock exchange approvals with respect to the Offering; (ii) access to additional capital; (iii) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (iv) delays in or failure to enter into a definitive agreement with Fresnillo with respect to the Camino Rojo Project; (v) health, safety and environmental risks; (vi) success of exploration, development and operation activities; (vii) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (viii) delays in obtaining or the failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (ix) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (x) uncertainty in estimates of production, capital and operating costs and potential production and cost overruns; (xi) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (xii) the fluctuating price of gold and silver; (xiii) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xiv) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; (xv) the Corporation’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions; (xvi) volatility in the market price of the Corporation’s securities; (xvii) and risks relating to the effects of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) on the Corporation.

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Corporation’s forward-looking statements. Although the Corporation believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this Prospectus Supplement and in the accompanying Base Shelf Prospectus, and in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the Corporation’s annual information form dated as of March 23, 2020 for the financial year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Annual Information Form”), for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this Prospectus Supplement and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. The Corporation disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. Investors are urged to read the Corporation’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which can be viewed online under the Corporation’s profile on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) at www.sedar.com.

 

S-6

 

 

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION

 

Unless otherwise indicated, scientific and technical information in this Prospectus Supplement relating to the Corporation’s mineral properties has been reviewed and approved by Hans Smit, P.Geo. Mr. Smit is a “Qualified Person” as defined under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”).

 

CURRENCY AND EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION

 

In this Prospectus Supplement, Canadian dollars are referred to as “Canadian dollars” or “C$” and United States dollars are referred to as “United States dollars” or “US$”.

 

The high, low and closing rates for Canadian dollars in terms of the United States dollar for each of the periods indicated, as quoted by the Bank of Canada, were as follows:

 

      Year Ended
December 31
 
      2019       2018  
High   C$ 1.3600     C$ 1.3642  
Low   C$ 1.2988     C$ 1.2288  
Rate at end of period   C$ 1.2988     C$ 1.3642  

 

 

On March 27, 2020, the daily exchange rate as quoted by the Bank of Canada was US$1.00=C$1.4056 or C$1.00=US$0.7114.

 

ELIGIBILITY FOR INVESTMENT

 

In the opinion of Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, counsel to the Corporation, and Bennett Jones LLP, counsel to the Underwriters, based on the current provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Tax Act”) and the regulations thereunder, in force as of the date hereof, the Common Shares, if issued on the date hereof, would be qualified investments for trusts governed by a registered retirement savings plan, registered retirement income fund, registered education savings plan, registered disability savings plan, tax-free savings account (collectively referred to as “Registered Plans”) or deferred profit sharing plan, provided that the Offered Shares are listed on a designated stock exchange for the purposes of the Tax Act (which currently includes the TSX) or the Corporation qualifies as a “public corporation” (as defined in the Tax Act).

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the holder, subscriber or annuitant of, or under, a Registered Plan (the “Controlling Individual”) will be subject to a penalty tax in respect of Offered Shares acquired by a Registered Plan if such securities are a prohibited investment for the particular Registered Plan. An Offered Share generally will be a “prohibited investment” for a Registered Plan if the Controlling Individual does not deal at arm’s length with the Corporation for the purposes of the Tax Act or the Controlling Individual has a “significant interest” (as defined in subsection 207.01(4) the Tax Act) in the Corporation, unless the Offered Shares are “excluded property”, as defined in subsection 207.01(1) of the Tax Act, for the Registered Plan. Controlling Individuals should consult their own tax advisors as to whether the Offered Shares would be a prohibited investment in their particular circumstances.

 

S-7

 

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

This Prospectus Supplement is deemed to be incorporated by reference into the Base Shelf Prospectus solely for the purpose of the Offering.

 

As of the date hereof, the following documents, filed with the various securities commissions or similar authorities in each of the provinces and territories of Canada, are specifically incorporated by reference into the Base Shelf Prospectus for purposes of the Offering, and form an integral part of the Prospectus:

 

1. the Annual Information Form;

 

2. the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (the “Annual Financial Statements”), the notes thereto and the independent auditors’ report thereon, together with the related management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations;

 

3. the management information circular of the Corporation dated May 9, 2019, prepared in connection with the annual and special meeting of shareholders held on June 12, 2019;

 

4. the material change report dated March 25, 2020 relating to the non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo Plc (“Fresnillo”) as to the commercial terms upon which the Corporation would obtain the right to expand the Camino Rojo Project oxide pit onto part of Fresnillo’s mineral concession located immediately to the north of the Camino Rojo Project under a definitive layback agreement (the “Layback Agreement”); and

 

5. the term sheet dated March 26, 2020.

 

All material change reports (excluding confidential material change reports), annual information forms, annual financial statements and the auditors’ report thereon and related MD&A, interim financial statements and related MD&A, information circulars, business acquisition reports, any news release issued by the Corporation that specifically states it is to be incorporated by reference and any other documents as may be required to be incorporated by reference into the Base Shelf Prospectus for purposes of the Offering under applicable Canadian securities laws which are filed by the Corporation with a securities commission or any similar authority in Canada after the date of this Prospectus Supplement and prior to termination of the distribution of the Offered Shares pursuant to the Prospectus, shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into the Base Shelf Prospectus for purposes of the Offering.

 

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any statement contained in this Prospectus Supplement or in a document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference in the Base Shelf Prospectus shall be deemed to be modified or superseded, for purposes of the Offering, to the extent that a statement contained herein or in any other currently or subsequently filed document that is later dated and incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference in the Base Shelf Prospectus modifies or supersedes such prior statement. The modifying or superseding statement need not state that it has modified or superseded a prior statement or include any other information set forth in the document that it modifies or supersedes. The making of a modifying or superseding statement shall not be deemed an admission for any purposes that the modified or superseded statement, when made, constituted a misrepresentation, an untrue statement of a material fact or an omission to state a material fact that is required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances in which it was made. Any statement so modified or superseded shall thereafter neither constitute, nor be deemed to constitute, a part of the Prospectus, except as so modified or superseded.

 

MARKETING MATERIALS

 

Any “marketing materials” (as defined in National Instrument 41-101 — General Prospectus Requirements (“NI 41-101”)) are not part of this Prospectus Supplement or the Base Shelf Prospectus to the extent that the contents thereof have been modified or superseded by a statement contained in this Prospectus Supplement or any amendment. Any “template version” (as defined in NI 41-101) filed with the securities commission or similar authority in each of the provinces and territories of Canada, except Québec in connection with the Offering after the date hereof but prior to the termination of the distribution of the Offered Shares under this Prospectus Supplement (including any amendments to, or an amended version of, any template version of marketing materials) is deemed to be incorporated by reference into this Prospectus Supplement and in the Base Shelf Prospectus.

 

S-8

 

 

THE CORPORATION

 

Orla is a Canadian company listed on the TSX. The Corporation’s focus is on the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral exploration and exploitation opportunities in which the Corporation’s exploration, development and operating expertise could substantially enhance shareholder value. Orla currently has two core projects – the Camino Rojo project in Zacatecas State, Mexico (the “Camino Rojo Project”) and the Cerro Quema project in Los Santos Province, Panama (the “Cerro Quema Project”).

 

The Camino Rojo Project is an advanced gold oxide heap leach project in a low risk jurisdiction, which leverages management’s and the Corporation’s board of directors’ extensive exploration, development, and operating experience in Mexico. The Camino Rojo Project covers over 163,000 hectares (“ha”). Access and infrastructure are excellent with a paved highway and power line nearby. A feasibility study on the Camino Rojo Project (the “Feasibility Study”) is included in the technical report prepared in accordance with the disclosure standards of NI 43-101 on the Camino Rojo Project titled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated effective June 25, 2019 (the “Camino Rojo Report”) containing current mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations for the Camino Rojo Project and operating plan has been filed under the Corporation’s profile on SEDAR.

 

The Cerro Quema Project includes mineralized zones with the potential to support a near-term oxide gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project concession covers 14,800 ha and has paved road access, supportive local communities, and private land ownership. The Cerro Quema Project is currently in the last stage of the permitting process for a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the technical report prepared in accordance with the disclosure standards of NI 43-101 on the Cerro Quema Project titled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”), which is available under the Corporation’s profile on SEDAR.

 

Recent Developments

 

Layback Agreement

 

On March 23, 2020, Orla announced it had entered into a non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo as to the commercial terms on which the Corporation would obtain the right to expand the oxide pit at the Camino Rojo Project onto part of Fresnillo’s mineral concession located immediately to the north of Orla’s property under the proposed Layback Agreement. The proposed Layback Agreement will allow access to oxide and transitional heap leachable mineral resources on Orla’s property below the open pit outlined in the Camino Rojo Report. In addition, the Layback Agreement will provide Orla with the right to mine from Fresnillo’s mineral concession, and recover, for Orla’s account, all oxide and transitional material amenable to heap leaching that are within an expanded open pit.

 

Under the terms of the proposed Layback Agreement, Orla would pay Fresnillo a total cash consideration of US$62.8 million based on the following schedule: (i) US$10 million due upon the execution of the Layback Agreement; (ii) US$15 million due upon Orla having received all funding and permits required for construction and development; or July 1, 2020, whichever is sooner; (iii) US$15 million due no later than (a) 12 months following the commencement of commercial production at the Camino Rojo Project or (b) December 1, 2022, whichever is earlier; and (iv) US$22.8 million due no later than (a) 24 months following the commencement of commercial production at the Camino Rojo Project or (b) December 1, 2023, whichever is earlier. The amounts for the third and fourth payments shall bear an interest of 5% per annum from July 1, 2020 until the date of payment.

 

The non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo has a term of 12 months and remains subject to execution of the Layback Agreement between the parties which is currently underway and expected during the first half of 2020. The proposed Layback Agreement will not preclude or restrict Fresnillo from participating in any future development of the sulphide mineral resource at the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Change in Auditor

 

The Corporation delivered a change of auditor notice dated March 25, 2020 in connection with the change in auditor from Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants to Ernst & Young LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants. Ernst & Young LLP has confirmed that they are independent with respect to the Corporation within the meaning of the CPA Code of Professional Conduct of the Chartered Professional Accountants of British Columbia.

 

S-9

 

 

More detailed information regarding the business of the Corporation as well as its operations, assets, and properties can be found in the Annual Information Form and other documents incorporated by reference herein available at www.sedar.com under the Corporation’s profile, and as supplemented by the disclosure herein. See “Documents Incorporated by Reference”.

 

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

The net proceeds to the Corporation from the Offering will be approximately C$72,289,774 or C$83,106,664 if the Over-Allotment Option is exercised in full, after deducting the Underwriters’ Commission and the expenses of the Offering (estimated to be C$350,000), which will be paid out of the proceeds of the Offering. The foregoing calculation assumes that approximately 16,600,900 Offered Shares are being purchased by the Key Shareholders (or approximately 18,126,700 Common Shares if the Over-Allotment Option is exercised in full).

 

The net proceeds of the Offering (assuming no exercise of the Over-Allotment Option) are anticipated to be applied as follows:

 

Use of Proceeds  
Camino Rojo Project construction expenditures C$ 31.9 million
Projected payments related to the Layback Agreement C$ 33.8 million
Working capital and general corporate purposes C$ 6.5 million
Total C$ 72. 2 million

 

The Corporation intends to spend the available funds as set forth above based on a budget which has been approved by the Corporation’s board of directors consistent with established internal control guidelines. The anticipated use of net proceeds from the Offering, as detailed above, is based on the best estimates prepared by management of the Corporation.

 

In order to advance the Camino Rojo Project, the Corporation expects the majority of the net proceeds from the Offering will be used for (1) the development and construction of the Camino Rojo Project, (2) to fund the projected payments to Fresnillo related to the Layback Agreement, and (3) for working capital and general corporate and administrative purposes.

 

Orla’s focus over the next 18 months is the construction of the Camino Rojo Project, which initial capital amounts to US$123 million. Together with the initial working capital requirements of approximately US$10 million as the project ramps up in mid-2020, and value-added taxes payable of approximately US$18 million (which is refundable over time), the total cash requirement to production for the Camino Rojo Project is expected to be approximately US$151 million. Proceeds from the secured project finance facility of up to US$125 million (the “Facility”), available pursuant to the loan agreement between Orla, Trinity Capital Partners Corporation and certain other lenders, will be used to fund the majority of the initial capital requirements for the construction of the Camino Rojo Project. The Corporation currently has US$25 million outstanding under the Facility. Two additional tranches of US$50 million each are available to Orla upon meeting certain conditions precedent. Orla intends to draw on the balance of the Facility during the second half of 2020. Funds from the Facility are required to be used to fund the development and construction of the Camino Rojo Project. The balance of the construction capital will come from the proceeds of this Offering, being C$31.9 million.

 

An amount of approximately C$33.8 million (US$25 million) from this Offering has been allocated for the first two payments related to the proposed Layback Agreement with Fresnillo. This Layback Agreement will allow Orla to access additional oxide and transitional material at depth below the current pit as set out in the Camino Rojo Report, as well as allow Orla to mine and recover, for its own account, oxide and transitional material from the Fresnillo concession. The Layback Agreement is expected to be entered into in the first half of 2020. In the event the Layback Agreement with Fresnillo is not entered into, these proceeds will be used toward the development and construction of the Camino Rojo Project and for exploration and studies at both the Camino Rojo Project and the Cerro Quema Project.

 

An amount of approximately C$6.5 million from this Offering has been allocated for planned for working capital and corporate general and administrative purposes including, but are not limited to, corporate head office personnel costs, public company costs, interest expense, and other general and administrative costs.

 

Pursuant to the Offering, if the Over-Allotment Option is exercised in full, the Corporation will receive additional net proceeds of C$10,816,891 after deducting the Underwriters’ Commission and expenses of the Offering. The net proceeds from the exercise of the Over-Allotment Option, if any, will be applied towards discretionary work programs at the Camino Rojo Project unrelated to construction and development, and at the Cerro Quema Project, as well as corporate overhead and strengthening of the Corporation’s working capital position. There is no assurance that the Over-Allotment Option will be exercised, in part or in full.

 

S-10

 

 

The above noted allocation represents the Corporation’s intentions with respect to its use of proceeds based on current knowledge, planning and expectations of management of the Corporation. Actual expenditures may differ from the estimates set forth above. There may be circumstances where, for sound business reasons, a reallocation of the net proceeds may be deemed prudent or necessary. The actual amount that the Corporation spends in connection with each of the intended uses of proceeds may vary significantly from the amounts specified above and will depend on a number of factors, including those referred to under “Risk Factors – Use of Proceeds”.

 

Based on the amount of funding raised, the Corporation’s planned exploration or other work programs may be postponed, or otherwise revised, as necessary, at its discretion. See “Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Resources”. As at December 31, 2019, the Corporation had cash of C$30 million, part of which has been deployed to advance the Camino Rojo Project, the Cerro Quema Project and for corporate overhead, such as salaries and general and administrative costs during the first quarter of 2020. The Corporation generates no operating revenue from the exploration and development activities on its properties and has negative cash flow from operating activities. The Corporation anticipates that it will continue to have negative cash flow until commercial production is achieved at the Camino Rojo Project. Some of the net proceeds of the Offering may be used to fund negative operating cash flows. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Corporation – Negative Operating Cash Flow.”

 

Until used for the above purposes, the Corporation may invest the net proceeds that it does not immediately require in short-term marketable debt securities, cash balances, certificates of deposit, and other instruments issued by banks or guaranteed by the government of Canada or add them to the working capital.

 

Hans Smit, P.Geo., is the “Qualified Person”, within the meaning of NI 43-101, who has reviewed and confirmed the above-noted use of net proceeds allocations as reasonable.

 

CONSOLIDATED CAPITALIZATION OF THE CORPORATION

 

There have been no material changes in the consolidated capitalization or indebtedness of the Corporation since the Annual Financial Statements (which are incorporated by reference herein).

 

As at December 31, 2019, after giving effect to the Offering, there will be a total of 223,702,168 Common Shares issued and outstanding (229,192,168 Common Shares if the Over-Allotment Option is exercised in full).

 

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

 

Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the Corporation has agreed to sell and the Underwriters have severally agreed to purchase on the Closing Date, an aggregate of 36,600,000 Offered Shares at a price of C$2.05 per Offered Share, payable in cash to the Corporation against delivery of such Offered Shares.

 

The closing of the Offering is expected to take place on April 3, 2020, or such other date as the Corporation and the Underwriters may agree, but in any event not later than 42 days after the date of this Prospectus Supplement. The obligations of the Underwriters under the Underwriting Agreement are several and not joint, nor joint and several, and may be terminated at their discretion upon the occurrence of certain stated events. For greater certainty, the COVID-19 outbreak and any related interruption to the business, affairs or financial condition of the Corporation, or any event, action, state or condition or financial occurrence related directly or indirectly to the COVID-19 outbreak (whether now known or unknown or whether foreseeable or unforeseeable in the future), including any adverse effect on the financial markets generally, shall not constitute an event or occurrence which will enable any Underwriter to terminate their obligations pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, unless such termination is agreed to in writing with the Corporation. The Underwriters are, however, severally obligated to take up and pay for all of the Offered Shares that they have agreed to purchase if any of the Offered Shares are purchased under the Underwriting Agreement. The terms of the Offering and the Offering Price have been determined by negotiation among the Corporation and the Underwriters with reference to the market price of the Common Shares and other factors.

 

Subject to certain qualifications and limitations, the Corporation has agreed to indemnify the Underwriters and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents against certain liabilities, including, without restriction, civil liabilities under Canadian securities legislation, and to contribute to any payments the Underwriters may be required to make in respect thereof.

 

S-11

 

 

Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the Corporation has agreed to pay the Underwriters a fee of C$0.10 per Offered Share (including, for certainty, the Over-Allotment Shares pursuant to the exercise of the Over-Allotment Option), other than in respect of sales to the Key Shareholders, on which a cash fee equal to C$0.02 per Offered Share will be paid, for aggregate fees payable by the Corporation of C$2,390,226, payable at the close of the Offering in consideration for their services in connection with this Offering. It is expected that the Key Shareholders will purchase approximately 16,600,900 Offered Shares.

 

The Corporation has granted to the Underwriters the Over-Allotment Option, exercisable in whole or in part in the sole discretion of the Underwriter for a period of 30 days from and including the Closing Date, to purchase up to an additional 5,490,000 Over-Allotment Shares on the same terms as set forth above solely to cover over-allocations, if any, and for market stabilization purposes. The Prospectus also qualifies the grant of the Over-Allotment Option and the Over-Allotment Shares issuable upon the exercise of the Over-Allotment Option. A purchaser who acquires Over-Allotment Shares forming part of the Underwriters’ over-allocation position acquires such Over-Allotment Shares under the Prospectus, regardless of whether the over-allocation position is ultimately filled through the exercise of the Over-Allotment Option or secondary market purchases. If the Over-Allotment Option is exercised in full, the aggregate Underwriters’ Commission payable by the Corporation will be C$2,827,836.

 

The Underwriters propose to offer the Offered Shares initially at the Offering Price. After the Underwriters have made a reasonable effort to sell all of the Offered Shares and Additional Shares (if applicable) at the Offering Price, the price at which the Offered Shares and Additional Shares (if applicable) are distributed pursuant to the Prospectus may be decreased and may be further changed from time to time to an amount not greater than the Offering Price, and the compensation realized by the Underwriters will be decreased by the amount that the aggregate price paid by purchasers for the Offered Shares and Additional Shares (if applicable) distributed pursuant to the Prospectus is less than the Offering Price.

 

In connection with the Offering, the Underwriters may over-allocate or effect transactions which stabilize or maintain the market price of the Common Shares at levels other than those which otherwise might prevail on the open market, including: stabilizing transactions; short sales (i.e., the sale by the Underwriters of a greater number of Offered Shares than they are required to purchase in the Offering); and purchases to cover positions created by short sales; and syndicate covering transactions. Such transactions, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time. Stabilizing transactions consist of bids or purchases made for the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the Common Shares while the Offering is in progress. The Underwriters must close out any short position by purchasing Common Shares in the open market. A short position is more likely to be created if the Underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the Common Shares in the open market that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the Offering.

 

In addition, in accordance with rules and policy statements of certain Canadian securities regulators, the Underwriters may not, at any time during the period of distribution, bid for or purchase Common Shares. The foregoing restriction is, however, subject to exceptions where the bid or purchase is not made for the purpose of creating actual or apparent active trading in, or raising the price of, the Common Shares. These exceptions include a bid or purchase permitted under the by-laws and rules of applicable regulatory authorities and the TSX, including the Universal Market Integrity Rules for Canadian Marketplaces, relating to market stabilization and passive market making activities and a bid or purchase made for and on behalf of a customer where the order was not solicited during the period of distribution.

 

As a result of these activities, the price of the Offered Shares may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the open market. If these activities are commenced, they may be discontinued by the Underwriters at any time. The Underwriters may carry out these transactions on any stock exchange on which the Common Shares are listed, in the over-the-counter market, or otherwise.

 

It is anticipated that the Offered Shares will be issued through the book-entry system, registered in the name of CDS or its nominee and will be deposited with CDS. Beneficial holders of the Offered Shares will receive only a customer confirmation from the Underwriters, or another registered dealer who is a CDS participant, and from or through whom a beneficial interest in the Offered Shares are acquired. If any Offered Shares are not able to be issued in the book-entry system through CDS in advance of the Closing Date for any reason, then those investors or their designated holders will receive definitive certificates representing their interests in such Offered Shares.

 

The Offering is being made in all of the provinces and territories of Canada, other than Québec. In addition, the Underwriters may offer the Offered Shares outside of Canada in compliance with local securities laws. The Corporation is not making an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the Offered Shares in any jurisdiction where such offer is not permitted.

 

The Corporation has agreed in the Underwriting Agreement that, subject to certain exceptions, for a period of 90 days after the Closing Date, it shall not (without the Lead Underwriter’s prior written consent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld), directly or indirectly, issue, sell, offer, grant an option or right in respect of, or otherwise dispose of, or agree to or announce any intention to issue, sell, offer, grant an option or right in respect of, or otherwise dispose of any additional Common Shares or securities or other financial instruments convertible into or having the right to acquire Common Shares (other than pursuant to (i) the Offering; (ii) the grant or exercise of stock options and other similar issuances pursuant to any stock option plan or similar share compensation arrangements in place (provided that in the case of new grants, the exercise price of such stock options or compensation arrangement will be no less than the Offering Price); (iii) the grant of restricted share units; and (iv) the issuance of Common Shares upon the exercise of convertible securities, warrants, options, or any other commitment or agreement outstanding).

 

S-12

 

 

The Corporation has also agreed pursuant to the terms of the Underwriting Agreement to, subject to certain exceptions, cause its directors and officers to enter into undertakings in favour of the Underwriters on or before the Closing Date, agreeing not to sell, transfer, assign, pledge or otherwise dispose of any securities of the Corporation for a period of 90 days from the Closing Date without the Lead Underwriter’s prior written consent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld.

 

The Corporation has applied to the TSX for approval of the listing of the Offered Shares to be distributed pursuant to the Prospectus. Listing will be subject to the Corporation fulfilling all of the listing requirements of the TSX.

 

The Offered Shares have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act or any state securities laws, and accordingly may not be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. Persons, except in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. Each Underwriter and each of its United States registered broker-dealer affiliates (“U.S. Affiliates”) has agreed that, except as permitted by the Underwriting Agreement (subject to all the agreements, covenants and restrictions set forth therein and exhibits and schedules thereto) and as expressly permitted by applicable United States federal and state securities laws, it will not offer or sell the Offered Shares, as part of its distribution at any time, within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. Persons and that all offers and sales of the Offered Shares will otherwise be made outside of the United States in accordance with Rule 903 of Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act. Terms used in this and the next paragraph have the meanings given to them in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act. The Underwriting Agreement (and the exhibits and schedules thereto) enables the Underwriters to (i) offer the Offered Shares for sale by the Corporation in the United States to a limited number of substituted purchasers who are U.S. Accredited Investors or to, or for the account or benefit of, such U.S. Persons, and (ii) offer and resell the Offered Shares that they have acquired pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement to certain “qualified institutional buyers”, as such term is defined in Rule 144A, in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, such U.S. Persons, provided such offers and sales are made in accordance with Rule 144A under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws, if available. Moreover, the Underwriting Agreement provides that the Underwriters will offer and sell the Offered Shares outside the United States in accordance with Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act.

 

The Offered Shares offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. Persons, if any, will be or considered “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144(a)(3) under the U.S. Securities Act and may only be offered, sold, pledged or otherwise transferred to the Corporation, outside the United States in compliance with Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act, or pursuant to an effective registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act, and, in each case, in compliance with applicable local laws or regulations. With respect to qualified institutional buyers in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. Persons who are acquiring Offered Shares pursuant to Rule 144A under the U.S. Securities Act, no certificate evidencing the Offered Shares will be issued to purchasers under this Prospectus, and registration will be made in the depository service of CDS. Qualified institutional buyers in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. Persons who are acquiring Offered Shares pursuant to Rule 144A under the U.S. Securities Act, will receive only a customer confirmation from the Underwriters or other registered dealer who is a CDS participant and from or through whom a beneficial interest in the Offered Shares is purchased. Offered Shares, if any, acquired by such qualified institutional buyers in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. Persons may not be deposited into the facilities of the Depositary Trust Company, or a successor depository within the United States, or be registered or arranged to be registered, with Cede & Co. or any successor thereto and are subject to contractual restrictions on transfer agreed to by or on behalf of such qualified institutional buyers in the United States or U.S. Persons.

 

In addition, until 40 days after the commencement of the Offering, an offer or sale of Common Shares within the United States or to U.S. Persons by any dealer (whether or not participating in the Offering) may violate the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act if such offer or sale is made otherwise than in accordance with Rule 144A under the U.S. Securities Act.

 

S-13

 

 

 

PRIOR SALES

 

During the 12-month period before the date of this Prospectus Supplement, the Corporation issued the following Common Shares:

 

Month of Issue   Type of Security   Number Issued   Issue/Exercise Price (C$)   Reason for Issuance
June 2019   Common Shares   212,500   0.62   Warrant exercise
June 2019   Common Shares   76,000   1.07   Vesting of Restricted Share Units
July 2019   Common Shares   5,630,000   0.62   Warrant exercise
August 2019   Common Shares   325,000   0.62   Warrant exercise
August 2019   Common Shares   300,000   1.39   Exercise of stock options
September 2019   Common Shares   6,667   1.54   Vesting of Restricted Share Units
September 2019   Common Shares   37,500   1.25   Exercise of stock options
October 2019   Common Shares   19,000   1.48   Exercise of stock options
December 2019   Common Shares   225,000   0.15   Exercise of stock options
December 2019   Common Shares   176,991   1.25   Exercise of stock options
December 2019   Common Shares   600,000   1.39   Exercise of stock options
January 2020   Common Shares   60,000   1.39   Exercise of stock options
January 2020   Common Shares   20,000   1.25   Exercise of stock options
February 2020   Common Shares   10,000   1.06   Exercise of stock options
Total:       7,698,658        

 

During the 12-month period before the date of this Prospectus Supplement, the Corporation has issued the following securities convertible into Common Shares:

 

Month of Issue   Type of Security   Number Issued   Issue/Exercise Price (C$)  
May 2019   Options   117,450   1.00  
May 2019   Deferred Share Units(1)   52,500   1.00  
July 2019   Warrants   5,842,500   1.65  
August 2019   Options   103,212   1.65  
August 2019   Deferred Share Units(1)   35,714   1.65  
December 2019   Warrants(2)   32,500,000   3.00  
March 2020   Options   1,033,439   2.21  
March 2020   Restricted Share Units(1)   320,447   2.21  
March 2020   Deferred Share Units(1)   135,747   2.21  
Total:       40,141,009      

 

Notes:

(1) Represents the deemed value of the restricted share units or the deferred share units on the date of award by the Corporation, although no money has been, or will be, paid to the Corporation in connection with the issuance of Common Shares pursuant to such rights.

(2) Issued to lenders in connection with the Facility.

 

S-14

 

 

TRADING PRICE AND VOLUME

 

The Common Shares are listed on the TSX under the symbol “OLA”. The following table sets forth the market price ranges and trading volumes of the Common Shares on the TSX over the 12-month period prior to the date of this Prospectus Supplement, as reported by the TSX:

 

Period

 
 

High

(C$)

 
   

Low

(C$)

 
   

Volume

 
 
March 1-27, 2020     2.48       1.48       5,302,440  
February 2020     2.70       1.99       3,410,455  
January 2020     2.58       1.78       5,479,729  
December 2019     2.05       1.60       14,818,571  
November 2019     1.72       1.45       2,133,402  
October 2019     1.74       1.42       3,126,895  
September 2019     1.78       1.49       3,665,894  
August 2019     1.80       1.45       6,244,258  
July 2019     1.54       1.10       10,442,066  
June 2019     1.12       0.96       1,461,761  
May 2019     1.08       0.96       1,326,871  
April 2019     1.10       0.85       2,613,332  
March 2019     1.20       1.00       1,725,766  
February 2019     1.40       1.10       2,942,904  
January 2019     1.28       0.94       1,032,688  

 

RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in the Offered Shares is subject to certain risks. Investors should carefully consider the risks described below, in the Annual Information Form, the MD&A, the Base Shelf Prospectus and other information elsewhere in the Prospectus Supplement, including the documents incorporated by reference into the Base Shelf Prospectus for purposes of the Offering, prior to making an investment in the Offered Shares. If any of such or other risks occur, the Corporation’s prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely impacted. In that case, the trading price of the Offered Shares could decline and investors could lose all or part of their investment. Additional risks and uncertainties of which the Corporation is currently unaware or that are unknown or that it currently deems to be immaterial could also have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. The Corporation cannot assure prospective purchasers that it will successfully address any or all of these risks. There is no assurance that any risk management steps taken will avoid future loss due to the occurrence of any of the risks described in this Prospectus Supplement and the accompanying Base Shelf Prospectus and in the documents incorporated by reference herein and therein, or other unforeseen risks.

 

Risks Related to the Corporation

 

COVID-19 Public Health Crisis

 

The Corporation’s business, operations and financial condition, and the market price of the Common Shares, could be materially and adversely affected by the outbreak of epidemics or pandemics or other health crises, including the recent outbreak of COVID-19. To date, there have been a large number of temporary business closures, quarantines and a general reduction in consumer activity in a number of countries including Canada, the United States, Europe and China. The outbreak has caused companies and various international jurisdictions to impose travel, gathering and other public health restrictions. While these effects are expected to be temporary, the duration of the various disruptions to businesses locally and internationally and the related financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Similarly, the Corporation cannot estimate whether or to what extent this outbreak and the potential financial impact may extend to countries outside of those currently impacted. Such public health crises can result in volatility and disruptions in the supply and demand for gold and other metals and minerals, global supply chains and financial markets, as well as declining trade and market sentiment and reduced mobility of people, all of which could affect commodity prices, interest rates, credit ratings, credit risk, share prices and inflation. The risks to the Corporation of such public health crises also include risks to employee health and safety, a slowdown or temporary suspension of operations in geographic locations impacted by an outbreak, increased labor and fuel costs, regulatory changes, political or economic instabilities or civil unrest. At this point, the extent to which COVID-19 will or may impact the Corporation is uncertain and these factors are beyond the Corporation’s control; however, it is possible that COVID-19 may have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, results of operations and financial condition and the market price of the Common Shares.

 

S-15

 

 

Negative Operating Cash Flow

 

The Corporation is an exploration stage company and has not generated cash flow from operations. The Corporation is devoting significant resources to the development of the Camino Rojo Project, the Cerro Quema Project and to actively pursue exploration and development opportunities, however, there can be no assurance that it will generate positive cash flow from operations in the future. The Corporation expects to continue to incur negative consolidated operating cash flow and losses until such time as it achieves commercial production at a particular project. The Corporation currently has negative cash flow from operating activities.

 

The Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate assumes that the Corporation can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Corporation

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Corporation’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Corporation. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by Fresnillo and that waste would be mined on Fresnillo’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on executing the Layback Agreement with Fresnillo which addresses the oxide and transition portion of the mineral resources that are amendable to heap leaching and a subsequent agreement addressing the sulphide mineral resources that are not amendable to heap leaching. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on the proposed Layback Agreement and a subsequent agreement being obtained with Fresnillo.

 

On March 23, 2020, Orla entered into a non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo as to the commercial terms on which Orla would obtain the right to expand the oxide pit at the Camino Rojo Project onto part of Fresnillo’s mineral concession located immediately to the north of Orla’s property under a proposed Layback Agreement. On completion, the Layback Agreement will allow access to oxide and transitional heap leachable mineral resources on Orla’s property below the open pit outlined in the Camino Rojo Report. In addition, the Layback Agreement will provide Orla with the right to mine from Fresnillo’s mineral concession, and recover for Orla’s account, all oxide and transitional material amenable to heap leaching that are within an expanded open pit. There can be no assurance that the Corporation will be able to negotiate the proposed Layback Agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Corporation or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Delays in, or failure to obtain, the proposed Layback Agreement with Fresnillo to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a portion of the oxide and transitional mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to mineralized material at depth. The Corporation will require a different agreement with Fresnillo to develop the sulphide portion of the mineral resources. Should a subsequent agreement to access the sulphide mineral resource with Fresnillo not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The Feasibility Study in the Camino Rojo Report was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on Fresnillo’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, the Layback Agreement with Fresnillo to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

Mineral resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions

 

The estimation of mineral resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

In particular, the estimation of mineral resources for the Camino Rojo Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching agreements with Fresnillo to allow mining to the north of the Corporation’s concessions. While the Corporation believes that the mineral resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that agreements with Fresnillo will be reached.

 

S-16

 

 

Although all mineralization included in the Corporation’s mineral resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Corporation, failure to reach agreements with Fresnillo would result in a significant reduction of the mineral resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in mineral resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Corporation.

 

Use of Proceeds

 

The Corporation currently intends to allocate the net proceeds received from the Offering as described under the heading “Use of Proceeds”; however, management will have broad discretion in the actual application of the net proceeds designated, including to fund capital expenditures on existing mineral properties, acquire additional acreage leaseholds, acquire additional properties and associated leaseholds, or for general corporate purposes, which are subject to change in the future. Management may elect to allocate net proceeds differently from that described herein, including in the event that the proposed Layback Agreement is not entered into, if they believe it would be in the Corporation’s best interests. Shareholders of the Corporation will have to rely upon the judgment of management with respect to the use of proceeds. Management may spend a portion or all of the net proceeds from the Offering in ways that shareholders of the Corporation may not desire or that may not yield a significant return or any return at all. Shareholders of the Corporation may not agree with the manner in which management chooses to allocate and spend the net proceeds. The failure by management to apply the net proceeds effectively could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business. Pending their use, the Corporation may also invest the net proceeds from the Offering in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value. See “Use of Proceeds”.

 

Risks Related to the Securities

 

Equity securities are subject to trading and volatility risks

 

The securities of publicly traded companies, particularly mineral exploration and development companies, can experience a high level of price and volume volatility and the value of the Corporation’s securities can be expected to fluctuate depending on various factors, not all of which are directly related to the success of the Corporation and its operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects. These include the risks described elsewhere in this Prospectus. Factors which may influence the price of the Corporation’s securities, including the Offered Shares, include, but are not limited to: worldwide economic conditions; changes in government policies; investor perceptions; movements in global interest rates and global stock markets; variations in operating costs; the cost of capital that the Corporation may require in the future; metals prices; the price of commodities necessary for the Corporation’s operations; recommendations by securities research analysts; issuances of Common Shares or debt securities by the Corporation; operating performance and, if applicable, the share price performance of the Corporation’s competitors; the addition or departure of key management and other personnel; the expiration of lock-up or other transfer restrictions on outstanding Common Shares; significant acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by or involving the Corporation or its competitors; news reports relating to trends, concerns, technological or competitive developments, regulatory changes and other related industry and market issues affecting the mining sector; publicity about the Corporation, the Corporation’s personnel or others operating in the industry; loss of a major funding source; and all market conditions that are specific to the mining industry.

 

There can be no assurance that such fluctuations will not affect the price of the Corporation’s securities, and consequently purchasers of Offered Shares may not be able to sell Offered Shares at prices equal to or greater than the price or value at which they purchased the Offered Shares or acquired them by way of the secondary market.

 

Investors may lose their entire investment

 

An investment in the Offered Shares is speculative and may result in the loss of an investor’s entire investment. Only potential investors who are experienced in high risk investments and who can afford to lose their entire investment should consider an investment in the Corporation.

 

Dilution from equity financing could negatively impact holders of Common Shares

 

The Corporation may from time to time raise funds through the issuance of Common Shares or the issuance of debt instruments or other securities convertible into Common Shares. The Corporation cannot predict the size or price of future issuances of Common Shares or the size or terms of future issuances of debt instruments or other securities convertible into Common Shares, or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of the Corporation’s securities will have on the market price of the Common Shares. Sales or issuances of substantial numbers of Common Shares, or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices of the Common Shares. With any additional sale or issuance of Common Shares, or securities convertible into Common Shares, investors will suffer dilution to their voting power and the Corporation may experience dilution in its earnings per share.

 

S-17

 

 

The Corporation does not pay dividends

 

No dividends on the Common Shares have been declared or paid to date. The Corporation anticipates that, for the foreseeable future, it will retain its cash resources for the operation and development of its business. Payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of the board of directors of the Corporation after taking into account many factors, including earnings, operating results, financial condition, current and anticipated cash needs and any restrictions in financing agreements, such as agreements with respect to the Facility, and the Corporation may never pay dividends.

 

LEGAL MATTERS

 

Certain legal matters relating to this Offering will be passed upon by Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP on behalf of the Corporation, and Bennett Jones LLP on behalf of the Underwriters.

 

As at March 27, 2020, the partners and associates of each of Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP and Bennett Jones LLP beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, less than 1% of the issued and outstanding securities of each class of the Corporation or of any associate or affiliate of the Corporation.

 

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

 

The transfer agent and registrar for the Common Shares is Computershare Trust Company of Canada at the principal offices in Vancouver and Toronto.

 

S-18

 

 

INTEREST OF EXPERTS

 

The following persons have been named as having prepared or certified a report, valuation, statement or opinion described or included in a filing, or referred to in a filing, made under National Instrument 51 – 102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations during, or relating to, the Corporation’s financial year ended December 31, 2019:

 

· Camino Rojo Report – Carl E. Defilippi, RM, SME of Kappes, Cassiday and Associates, Michael Hester, Independent Mining Consultants, Inc., FAusIMM, Dr. Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. of Resource Geosciences Incorporated and David Hawkins, Barranca Group, LLC, CPG, prepared the Camino Rojo Report.

 

· Cerro Quema Report – Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA prepared the Cerro Quema Report.

 

None of the foregoing persons, or any director, officer, employee or partner thereof, as applicable, received or has received a direct or indirect interest in the Corporation’s property or the property of any of the Corporation’s associates or affiliates. The foregoing persons held an interest in either less than 1% or none of the Corporation’s securities or the securities of any associate or affiliate of the Corporation at the time of preparation of the respective reports and after the preparation of such reports and estimates, and they did not receive any direct or indirect interest in any of the Corporation’s securities or the securities of any associate or affiliate of the Corporation in connection with the preparation of the above mentioned reports. None of the aforementioned persons nor any director, officer, employee or partner, as applicable, of the aforementioned companies or partnerships is currently expected to be elected, appointed or employed as a director, officer or employee of the Corporation or of any associate or affiliate of the Corporation.

 

All scientific and technical information in this Prospectus Supplement has been reviewed and approved by Hans Smit, P.Geo., who is a “Qualified Person” under NI 43-101. As of the date hereof, Mr. Smit holds 3,130,070 Common Shares, 100,000 warrants, 1,214,305 stock options and 174,339 restricted share units of the Corporation.

 

Davidson & Company LLP of 1200-609 Granville Street, Vancouver, BC V7Y 1G6, delivered the audit report to shareholders of Orla on March 20, 2020 with respect to the Annual Financial Statements, and has advised they are independent of the Corporation within the meaning of the relevant rules and related interpretations prescribed by the relevant professional bodies in Canada and any applicable legislation or regulations.

 

S-19

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF THE CORPORATION

 

Dated: March 30, 2020

 

This short form prospectus, together with the documents incorporated by reference, as supplemented by the foregoing, constitutes full, true and plain disclosure of all material facts relating to the securities offered by the short form prospectus and this supplement as required by the securities legislation of each of the provinces and territories of Canada, except Québec.

 

     
(“Signed”) JASON SIMPSON   (“Signed”) ETIENNE MORIN
Chief Executive Officer   Chief Financial Officer
   
On behalf of the Board of Directors
   
(“Signed”) CHARLES JEANNES   (“Signed”) GEORGE ALBINO
Director   Director
       

 

C-1

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF THE UNDERWRITERS

 

Dated: March 30, 2020

 

To the best of our knowledge, information and belief, the short form prospectus, together with the documents incorporated by reference, as supplemented by the foregoing, constitutes full, true and plain disclosure of all material facts relating to the securities offered by the short form prospectus and this supplement as required by the securities legislation of each of the provinces and territories of Canada, except Québec.

 

STIFEL NICOLAUS CANADA INC.

 

(“Signed”) PIERRE LALIBERTE

Director, Investment Banking

 

DESJARDINS SECURITIES INC.

 

(“Signed”) BRUNO KAISER

Managing Director, Head of Metals & Mining, Investment Banking

 

PARADIGM CAPITAL INC.

 

(“Signed”) JOHN BOOTH

Head of Investment Banking

 

CORMARK SECURITES INC.

 

(“Signed”) KEVIN CARTER

Managing Director, Investment Banking

 

C-2

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.30

 

UNDERWRITING AGREEMENT

March 30, 2020

 

Orla Mining Ltd.

595 Howe Street, Suite 202

Vancouver, BC V6C 2T5

 

Attention: Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer, Director

 

Dear Sir:

 

The undersigned, Stifel Nicolaus Canada Inc. (the "Lead Underwriter"), Desjardins Securities Inc., Paradigm Capital Inc. and Cormark Securities Inc. (each, including the Lead Underwriter, an "Underwriter" and, collectively, the "Underwriters") understand that Orla Mining Ltd. (the "Corporation") intends to issue and sell an aggregate of 36,600,000 common shares ("Common Shares") in the capital of the Corporation (collectively, the "Purchased Shares") at a price of $2.05 per Purchased Share (the "Purchase Price"), for aggregate gross proceeds of $75,030,000.

 

The Corporation hereby grants to the Underwriters an option (the "Over-Allotment Option"), entitling the Underwriters to purchase severally and not jointly, nor jointly and severally, up to an additional 5,490,000 Common Shares (collectively, the "Additional Shares") at the Purchase Price per Additional Share to cover over-allotments, if any, and for market stabilization purposes. The Over-Allotment Option shall be exercisable in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time on or prior to the date that is 30 days following the Closing Date (as hereinafter defined). The offering and sale of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares by the Corporation described in this Agreement (as hereinafter defined) is hereinafter referred to as the "Offering".

 

The net proceeds of the Offering shall be used by the Corporation substantially in accordance with the disclosure set out under the heading "Use of Proceeds" (and subject to the qualifications stated therein) in the Prospectus Supplement (as hereinafter defined).

 

The Corporation has prepared and filed a preliminary short form base shelf prospectus dated December 17, 2018 (the "Preliminary Base Shelf Prospectus") and a final short form base shelf prospectus dated March 11, 2019 (the "Final Base Shelf Prospectus") in respect of the offering of common shares, warrants, subscription receipts, units and debt securities for an aggregate offering price of up to $300,000,000.

 

The Offering shall take place in the Qualifying Jurisdictions (as hereinafter defined) and in the United States, provided, however, that offers and sales of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares in the United States shall be made only (i) to Qualified Institutional Buyers (as hereinafter defined) on a private placement basis pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act (as hereinafter defined) provided by Rule 144A (as hereinafter defined) and (ii) by the Corporation in the United States to a limited number of substituted purchasers who are U.S. Accredited Investors (as hereinafter defined) on a private placement basis pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act (as hereinafter defined) provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D (as hereinafter defined) and, in each case, pursuant to exemptions from the securities laws of the states of the United States, as applicable, and in all cases, in accordance with United States securities laws and the provisions of Schedule "A" to this Agreement. The Underwriters, on their own behalf and on behalf of their U.S. Affiliates (as hereinafter defined), and the Corporation acknowledge that Schedule "A" (and exhibits thereto) forms part of this Agreement and is incorporated by reference herein.

 

 

- 2 -

 

Based upon and subject to the terms and conditions set out below, the Underwriters hereby severally and not jointly, nor jointly and severally, agree to purchase from the Corporation on the Closing Date (as hereinafter defined), in the respective percentages set out in Section 6 of this Agreement, and the Corporation hereby agrees to sell to the Underwriters, all, but not less than all, of the Purchased Shares at the Purchase Price per Purchased Share, and, in the event and to the extent the Over-Allotment Option granted to the Underwriters pursuant to Section 11 of this Agreement is exercised by the Underwriters, the Corporation agrees to sell to each of the Underwriters, and each of the Underwriters agrees severally and not jointly, nor jointly and severally, to purchase from the Corporation, the respective percentage of the Additional Shares set forth opposite the name of such Underwriter in Section 6 of this Agreement at the Purchase Price per Additional Share.

 

The Underwriters propose to offer the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares at the Purchase Price specified above. After a reasonable effort has been made to sell all of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares at the Purchase Price, the Underwriters may subsequently reduce the selling prices to investors from time to time in order to sell any of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares remaining unsold, provided that any such reduction in the Purchase Price shall not affect the gross proceeds paid to the Corporation.

 

In consideration of the Underwriters' agreement to purchase the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares (if applicable) and the other services to be rendered in connection with the Offering, including assisting in preparing documentation relating to the sale of the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares including the Prospectus Supplement (and any Supplementary Material (as hereinafter defined)) and distributing the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares, directly and through other investment dealers and brokers, the Corporation agrees to pay the Underwriters' Fee (as hereinafter defined) to the Underwriters at the Time of Closing (as hereinafter defined).

 

The additional terms and conditions of this underwriting agreement (the "Agreement") are set forth below.

 

1.                   DEFINITIONS

 

1.1 In this Agreement, including any schedules forming a part of this Agreement:

 

(a) "Acts" means the Securities Acts or equivalent securities regulatory legislation of the Qualifying Jurisdictions and "Act" means the Securities Act or equivalent securities regulatory legislation of a specified Qualifying Jurisdiction;
     
(b) "Additional Shares" means the up to 5,490,000 Common Shares issuable if the Over-Allotment Option is exercised;
     
(c) "Agnico Pre-emptive Right" means the contractual pre-emptive right granted to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited pursuant to the amended and restated investor rights agreement dated December 17, 2019 between the Corporation and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited, pursuant to which Agnico Eagle Mines Limited has the pro rata right to participate in any future issuances of securities of the Corporation, including the Offering, to maintain its percentage shareholding, for as long as Agnico Eagle Mines Limited maintains at least 5.0% equity interest in the Corporation;

 

 

- 3 -

 

(d) "AIF" means the Corporation's annual information form dated March 23, 2020 in respect of the year ended December 31, 2019;
     
(e) "Ancillary Documents" means all agreements, certificates and documents executed and delivered, or to be executed and delivered, by the Corporation in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
     
(f) "Anti-Money Laundering Laws" has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 3.1(mmm) hereto;
     
(g) "Applicable Securities Laws" means, in respect of the Offering, collectively the Acts and Regulations having application and the rules, policies, instruments, notices and orders issued by the applicable Regulatory Authorities having application;
     
(h) "Audited Financial Statements" means the audited statement of financial position as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, statement of profit or loss, statement of changes in shareholders' equity and statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, in each case including the notes thereto and the auditor's reports thereon, all as incorporated by reference in the Prospectuses;
     
(i) "Board of Directors" means the board of directors of the Corporation;
     
(j) "Bring-Down Letter" has the meaning given to that term in Section 4.1(n)(ix) hereto;
     
(k) "Business Day" means a day, other than a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which chartered banks are not open for business in the City of Vancouver or the City of Toronto;
     
(l) "Camino APA" means the asset purchase agreement dated June 20, 2017, as amended September 29, 2017, between Minera Camino Rojo, S.A. De C.V., the Corporation, Minera Peñasquito, S.A. De C.V. and Goldcorp Inc.;
     
(m) "Camino Rojo Project" means the Camino Rojo project located in the Municipality of Mazapil, State of Zacatecas, near the village of San Tiburcio, in Mexico, as described in the Camino Rojo Technical Report;
     
(n) "Camino Rojo Project Title Opinions" has the meaning given to that term in Section 4.1(n)(iv) hereto;
     
(o) "Camino Rojo Technical Report" means the report entitled "Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico" dated effective June 25, 2019, prepared by Carl Defilippi, RM, SME, of Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, Michael Hester, FAusIMM, of Independent Mining Consultants, Inc., Dr. Matthew Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G., of Resource Geosciences Incorporated, and David Hawkins, CPG, of Barranca Group, LLC;
     
(p) "Cassels" has the meaning given to that term in Section 4.1(n)(ii) hereto;
     
(q) "CDS" has the meaning given to that term in Section 8.3 hereto;

 

 

- 4 -

 

(r) "Cerro Quema Project" means the Cerro Quema project located in Los Santos Province, Panama, as described in the Cerro Quema Technical Report;
     
(s) "Cerro Quema Technical Report" means the report entitled "Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits" dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014, prepared by Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, CPG, of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE, of Kappes Cassidy and Associates;
     
(t) "CFPOA" has the meaning given to that term in Section 3.1(ddd) hereto;
     
(u) "Closing" means the closing of the Offering pursuant to the terms of this Agreement;
     
(v) "Closing Date" means April 3, 2020, or such other date as may be mutually agreed in writing by the Corporation and the Underwriters;
     
(w) "Closing Materials" has the meaning given to that term in Section 4.1(n)(xi) hereto;
     
(x) "Closing Time" means 8:00 a.m. (Toronto time) or such other time as may be agreed to by the Corporation and the Underwriters on the Closing Date, or in the case of the Over-Allotment Closing, 8:00 a.m. (Toronto time) or such other time as may be agreed to by the Corporation and the Underwriters on the Over-Allotment Closing Date;
     
(y) "Comfort Letter" has the meaning given to that term in Section 4.1(n)(i) hereto;
     
(z) "Commissions" means the applicable securities commission or securities regulatory authority (other than stock exchanges) in the Qualifying Jurisdictions and "Commission" means any one of them;
     
(aa) "Common Shares" means the common shares in the capital of the Corporation;
     
(bb) "Contaminant" means and includes, without limitation, any pollutants, dangerous substances, liquid wastes, hazardous wastes, hazardous materials, hazardous substances or contaminants or any other matter including any of the foregoing, as defined or described as such pursuant to any Environmental Law;
     
(cc) "Corporation" means Orla Mining Ltd., a corporation incorporated under the federal laws of Canada;
     
(dd) "Corporation Financial Statements" mean the Audited Financial Statements;
     
(ee) "Corporation Subsidiaries" means Orla Mining (Canada) Ltd., CR Acquisitions Ltd., Minerometalurgica San Miguel S. de R.L. de C.V., Minera Cerro Quema S.A., Aurum Exploration Inc., Monitor Gold Corporation and Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV;
     
(ff) "COVID-19 Outbreak" has the meaning given to that term in Section 3.1(ii) hereto;
     
(gg) "distribution" (or "distribute" as derived therefrom) has the meaning given to that term in the Securities Act (British Columbia);

 

 

- 5 -

 

(hh) "Environmental Activity" means and includes, without limitation, any present activity, event or circumstance in respect of a Contaminant, including, without limitation, the storage, use, holding, collection, purchase, accumulation, assessment, generation, manufacture, construction, processing, treatment, stabilization, disposition, handling or transportation thereof, or the release, escape, leaching, dispersal or migration thereof into the natural environment, including the movement through or in the air, soil, surface water or groundwater;
     
(ii) "Environmental Laws" mean and include, without limitation, any and all applicable international, federal, provincial, state, territorial, municipal or local laws, statutes, regulations, treaties, orders, judgments, decrees, ordinances, official directives and all authorizations relating to the environment, occupational health and safety, or any Environmental Activity;
     
(jj) "Final Base Shelf Prospectus" means the final short form base shelf prospectus of the Corporation dated March 11, 2019, including all documents incorporated therein by reference;
     
(kk) "Final Receipt" means the receipt issued by the British Columbia Securities Commission, as principal regulator under NP 11-202, evidencing that a receipt has been, or has been deemed to be, issued for the Final Base Shelf Prospectus in each of the Qualifying Jurisdictions;
     
(ll) "Former Auditors" means Davidson & Company LLP, the former auditors of the Corporation;
     
(mm) "Governmental Authority" means governments, regulatory authorities, governmental departments, agencies, commissions (including the Commissions), stock exchanges, bureaus, officials, ministers, Crown corporations, courts, bodies, boards, tribunals or dispute settlement panels or other law, rule or regulation-making organizations or entities:
     
(a) having or purporting to have jurisdiction on behalf of any nation, province, territory or state or any other geographic or political subdivision of any of them; or

 

(b) exercising, or entitled or purporting to exercise any administrative, executive, judicial, legislative, policy, regulatory or taxing authority or power;

 

(nn) "IFRS" means International Financial Reporting Standards formulated by the International Accounting Standards Board;
     
(oo) "Information" means all information regarding the Corporation since December 31, 2017, or becomes up to the Closing Date, publicly available through filing on SEDAR and includes, but is not limited to, all material change reports, press releases, financial statements and management's discussion and analysis of the Corporation;
     
(pp) "Layback Agreement" means the definitive agreement to be entered into between the Corporation and Fresnillo Plc pursuant to which the Corporation would acquire the right to expand the Camino Rojo oxide pit onto part of Fresnillo Plc's mineral concession located immediately to the north of the Corporation's property for total cash consideration of US$62.8 million, such agreement to be on substantially the same terms and conditions as set out in the Layback LOI;

 

 

- 6 -

 

(qq) "Layback LOI" means the non-binding letter of intent dated March 18, 2020 between the Corporation and Fresnillo Plc with respect to the acquisition by the Corporation of the right to expand the Camino Rojo oxide pit onto part of Fresnillo Plc's mineral concession located immediately to the north of the Corporation's property for total cash consideration of US$62.8 million;
     
(rr) "Lead Underwriter" means Stifel Nicolaus Canada Inc.;
     
(ss) "Legal Opinions" has the meaning given to that term in Section 4.1(n)(ii) hereto;
     
(tt) "Licenses" has the meaning given to that term in Section 3.1(z) hereto;
     
(uu) "Loan Agreement" means the loan agreement dated December 18, 2019 among the Corporation, Trinity Capital Partners Corporation and a syndicate of other lenders;
     
(vv) "Material Adverse Effect" when used in connection with an entity means any change (including a decision to implement such a change made by the board of directors or by senior management who believe that confirmation of the decision by the board of directors is probable), fact, event, violation, inaccuracy, circumstance or effect that is materially adverse to the business, assets (including intangible assets), properties, capitalization, affairs, condition (financial or otherwise) or results of operations of such entity and its parent or subsidiaries (if applicable), taken as a whole whether or not arising in the ordinary course of business of such entity;
     
(ww) "material change" has the meaning given to that term in the Securities Act (British Columbia);
     
(xx) "Material Corporation Subsidiaries" means Minera Cerro Quema S.A. and Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV;
     
(yy) "Material Contracts" has the meaning given to that term in Section 3.1(aaa) hereto;
     
(zz) "material fact" has the meaning given to that term in the Securities Act (British Columbia);

 

(aaa) "misrepresentation" has the meaning given to that term in the Securities Act (British Columbia);
     
(bbb) "Mountain Gold Lease" means the lease agreement dated January 25, 2018 between the vendor, Mountain Gold Claims LLC, the Corporation and Monitor Gold Corporation, pursuant to which the Corporation may acquire up to a 100% interest in the Monitor Gold Corporation exploration project;
     
(ccc) "Named Executive Officers" means each Chief Executive Officer, each Chief Financial Officer and each of the three most highly compensated executive officers, other than each Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, who were serving as executive officers at the end of the most recently completed financial year and whose total salary and bonus exceeds $150,000 as well as any additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided except that the individual was not serving as an officer of the Corporation at the end of the most recently completed financial year end;

 

 

- 7 -

 

(ddd) "Newmont Pre-emptive Right" means the contractual pre-emptive right granted to Newmont Corporation pursuant to the investor rights agreement dated November 7, 2017 between the Corporation and Goldcorp Inc. (a subsidiary of Newmont Corporation), pursuant to which Newmont Corporation has the pro rata right to participate in any future issuances of securities of the Corporation, including the Offering, to maintain its percentage shareholding, for as long as Newmont Corporation maintains at least 10.0% equity interest in the Corporation.
     
(eee) "NI 43-101" means National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators;
     
(fff) "NI 41-101" means National Instrument 41-101 – General Prospectus Requirements adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators;
     
(ggg) "NI 44-101" means National Instrument 44-101 – Short Form Prospectus Distributions adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators;
     
(hhh) "NI 44-102" means National Instrument 44-102 – Shelf Distributions adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators;
     
(iii) "NI 51-102" means National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators;
     
(jjj) "NP 11-202" means National Policy 11-202 – Process for Prospectus Reviews in Multiple Jurisdictions adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators;
     
(kkk) "Offering" means the offering and sale of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement;
     
(lll) "Offering Documents" means, collectively, the Prospectuses, any Supplementary Material and the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum;
     
(mmm) "Officers' Certificate" has the meaning given to that term in Section 4.1(n)(vii) hereto;
     
(nnn) "Over-Allotment Closing Date" means the third Business Day after each notice of exercise of the Over-Allotment Option is delivered to the Corporation, or any earlier or later date as may be agreed to in writing by the Corporation and the Underwriters, each acting reasonably;
     
(ooo) "Over-Allotment Option" means the option to purchase the Additional Shares granted to the Underwriters as set out on page 1 hereof;
     
(ppp) "Over-Allotment Closing" means the purchase of Additional Shares contemplated upon the exercise of the Over-Allotment Option;
     
(qqq) "Person" has the meaning given to that term in the Securities Act (British Columbia);

 

 

- 8 -

 

(rrr) "Preliminary Base Shelf Prospectus" means the preliminary short form base shelf prospectus of the Corporation dated December 17, 2018, including all documents incorporated therein by reference;
     
(sss) "Preliminary Receipt" means the receipt issued by the British Columbia Securities Commission, as principal regulator under NP 11-202, evidencing that a receipt has been, or has deemed to be, issued for the Preliminary Base Shelf Prospectus in each of the Qualifying Jurisdictions;
     
(ttt) "Pre-emptive Rights" means, collectively, the Agnico Pre-emptive Right and the Newmont Pre-emptive Right.
     
(uuu) "Properties" means the properties comprising the Camino Rojo Project and the Cerro Quema Project;
     
(vvv) "Property Rights" has the meaning given to that term in Section 3.1(bb) hereto;
     
(www) "Prospectuses" means collectively the Preliminary Base Shelf Prospectus, the Final Base Shelf Prospectus and the Prospectus Supplement;
     
(xxx) "Prospectus Supplement" means the shelf prospectus supplement of the Corporation dated March 30, 2020 to the Final Base Shelf Prospectus relating to the distribution of the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares, including all documents incorporated therein by reference;
     
(yyy) "Purchase Price" has the meaning given to that term on page 1 of this Agreement;
     
(zzz) "Purchased Shares" has the meaning given to that term on page 1 of this Agreement:
     
(aaaa) "Qualified Institutional Buyer" means a "qualified institutional buyer" as that term is defined in Rule 144A;
     
(bbbb) "Qualifying Jurisdictions" means each of the provinces and territories of Canada, excluding Quebec, and "Qualifying Jurisdiction" means any one of them;
     
(cccc) "Regulation D" means Regulation D under the U.S. Securities Act;
     
(dddd) "Regulation S" means Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act;
     
(eeee) "Regulations" means the securities rules or regulations proclaimed under the Acts and "Regulation" means the securities rules or regulations proclaimed under a specified Act;
     
(ffff) "Regulatory Authorities" means collectively the Commissions and the TSX;
     
(gggg) "Rule 144A" mean Rule 144A adopted by the SEC under the U.S. Securities Act;
     
(hhhh) "SEC" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission;
     
(iiii) "SEDAR" means the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval;

 

 

- 9 -

 

(jjjj) "Selling Jurisdictions" means collectively, each of the Qualifying Jurisdictions and any other jurisdictions outside of Canada as mutually agreed to by the Corporation and the Underwriters;
     
(kkkk) "Supplementary Material" means, collectively, any documents supplemental to the Prospectuses including any amending or supplemental prospectus or other supplemental documents (including documents incorporated by reference after the date of the Prospectuses) or similar documents;
     
(llll) "Tax Act" means the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the regulations thereunder as amended from time to time;
     
(mmmm) "Taxes" has the meaning given to that term in Section 3.1(bbb) hereto;
     
(nnnn) "Technical Reports" means, collectively, the Camino Rojo Technical Report and the Cerro Quema Technical Report;
     
(oooo) "template version" has the meaning ascribed thereto under NI 41-101 and includes any revised template version of marketing materials as contemplated by NI 41-101;
     
(pppp) "trade" has the meaning given to that term in the Securities Act (British Columbia);
     
(qqqq) "Transfer Agent" means Computershare Investor Services Inc., the registrar and transfer agent for the Common Shares;
     
(rrrr) "TSX" means the Toronto Stock Exchange;
     
(ssss) "Underwriter" or "Underwriters" has the meaning given to that term on page 1 of this Agreement;
     
(tttt) "Underwriters' Expenses" has the meaning given to that term in Section 5.2 hereto;
     
(uuuu) "Underwriters' Fee" means the cash fee to be paid to the Underwriters at the Closing Time in an amount equal to 5.0% of the gross proceeds received by the Corporation from the issue and sale of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, provided that such cash commission shall be equal to 1.0% of the gross proceeds received by the Corporation from the issue and sale of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares to Newmont Corporation, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited, Pierre Lassonde, Trinity Capital Partners Corporation and directors/management of the Corporation. For greater certainty, the "Underwriters' Fee" shall include any proceeds received in respect of the Over-Allotment Option;
     
(vvvv) "United States" or "U.S." means the United States of America, its territories and possessions, any state of the United States and the District of Columbia;
     
(wwww) "U.S. Accredited Investor" means an "accredited investor" as such term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the U.S. Securities Act;
     
(xxxx) "U.S. Affiliate" means a duly registered United States broker-dealer affiliate of an Underwriter;

 

 

- 10 -

 

(yyyy) "U.S. Exchange Act" means the United States Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations made thereunder;
     
(zzzz) "U.S. Person" means a "U.S. person" as such term is defined in Rule 902(k) of Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act;
     
(aaaaa) "U.S. Private Placement Memorandum" means the U.S. private placement memorandum, in a form satisfactory to the Underwriters and the Corporation, acting reasonably, to which will be attached the Prospectus Supplement, to be delivered to any offerees and purchasers of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares, if any, in the United States in accordance with Schedule "A" hereto, and any exhibits, schedules or attachments thereto;
     
(bbbbb) "U.S. Purchasers" means Qualified Institutional Buyers or U.S. Accredited Investors, as applicable, purchasing Purchased Shares in the United States in accordance with Schedule "A" hereto;
     
(ccccc) "U.S. Securities Act" means the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations made thereunder; and
     
(ddddd) "U.S. Securities Laws" means all applicable securities legislation in the United States, including, without limitation, the U.S. Securities Act, the U.S. Exchange Act and any applicable state securities laws.

 

1.2 All references to dollar figures in this Agreement are to Canadian dollars.
   
1.3 In this Agreement, a reference to "the knowledge of the Corporation" means to the knowledge, information and belief of the directors and senior officers of the Corporation after due enquiry.

 

2.                   FILING, DELIVERY AND DISTRIBUTION

 

2.1 The Corporation represents and warrants to the Underwriters that the Corporation has prepared and filed the Preliminary Base Shelf Prospectus with the Commissions and has obtained a Preliminary Receipt for the Preliminary Base Shelf Prospectus, which receipt also evidences that the Ontario Securities Commission has issued a receipt for the Preliminary Base Shelf Prospectus.
   
2.2 The Corporation represents and warrants to the Underwriters that the Corporation has prepared and filed the Final Base Shelf Prospectus with the Commissions and has obtained a Final Receipt for the Final Base Shelf Prospectus, which receipt also evidences that the Ontario Securities Commission has issued a receipt for the Final Base Shelf Prospectus.

 

 

- 11 -

 

2.3 The Corporation covenants with the Underwriters that it shall have, by no later than 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on March 30, 2020, prepared and filed the Prospectus Supplement with the Commissions, in form and substance satisfactory to the Underwriters, and will promptly fulfil and comply with, to the satisfaction of the Lead Underwriter, acting reasonably, Applicable Securities Laws required to be fulfilled or complied with by the Corporation to enable the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares to be lawfully distributed to the public in the Qualifying Jurisdictions through the Underwriters or any other investment dealers or brokers registered as such in the Qualifying Jurisdictions.
   
2.4 The Corporation shall permit the Underwriters, acting reasonably, to participate in the preparation of, approve the form of, and review all documents incorporated by reference in, any such Prospectus Supplement (including marketing materials), and any other Ancillary Documents used in connection with the Offering including the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum and shall have allowed the Underwriters to conduct all due diligence investigations that they reasonably require in order to fulfil their obligations as Underwriters under the Applicable Securities Laws. The Corporation shall furnish to the Underwriters all the information relating to the Corporation and its business and affairs as is reasonably requested in connection with the Offering.
   
2.5 During the distribution of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares:
   
(a) the Corporation shall prepare, in consultation with the Lead Underwriter, and approve in writing, prior to such time any marketing materials are provided to potential investors of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, a template version of any marketing materials reasonably requested to be provided by the Underwriters to any such potential investor, such marketing materials to comply with Applicable Securities Laws and to be acceptable in form and substance to the Underwriters and their counsel, acting reasonably;
     
(b) the Lead Underwriter shall, on behalf of the Underwriters, approve a template version of any such marketing materials in writing prior to such time such marketing materials are provided to potential investors in the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares;
     
(c) the Corporation shall file a template version of the English version of any such marketing materials on SEDAR as soon as reasonably practicable after such marketing materials are so approved in writing by the Corporation and the Lead Underwriter, on behalf of the Underwriters, and in any event on or before the day the marketing materials are first provided to any potential investor in the Purchased Shares or any Additional Shares, and any comparables shall be removed from the template version in accordance with NI 44-102 prior to filing such on SEDAR (provided that if any such comparables are removed, the Corporation shall deliver a complete template version of any such marketing materials to the Commissions), and the Corporation shall provide a copy of such filed template version to the Underwriters, as soon as practicable following such filing; and
     
(d) following the approvals set forth in Sections 2.5(a) to (c), the Underwriters may provide a limited-use version of such marketing materials to potential investors in the Purchased Shares or any Additional Shares in accordance with the Applicable Securities Laws.
     
2.6 The Corporation and each of the Underwriters, on a several basis, covenants and agrees not to provide any potential investor of the Purchased Shares or any Additional Shares with any marketing materials except for marketing materials which have been approved as contemplated in Section 2.5 and then only to potential investors in the Qualifying Jurisdictions.

 

 

- 12 -

 

2.7 Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Underwriters offer to purchase the Purchased Shares, and by acceptance of this Agreement the Corporation agrees to sell to the Underwriters, and the Underwriters agree to purchase at the Closing Time on the Closing Date, all, but not less than all, of the Purchased Shares.
   
2.8 The distribution of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares shall be qualified by the Prospectuses under Applicable Securities Laws in the Qualifying Jurisdictions. The Purchased Shares and/or Additional Shares may also be offered and sold:
   
(a) on a private placement basis in the United States to Qualified Institutional Buyers or U.S. Accredited Investors in accordance with the terms, conditions, representations, warranties and covenants of the parties contained in Schedule "A" hereto, the provisions of which are agreed to by the Corporation, the Underwriters and the U.S. Affiliates, and which Schedule "A" forms part of this Agreement and is incorporated by reference herein; and
     
(b) on a private placement basis in such other jurisdictions as the Corporation and the Underwriters (and selling group members appointed by the Underwriters) may agree, provided the distribution of Purchased Shares and/or Additional Shares in such other jurisdictions are completed in accordance with the applicable laws of such other jurisdictions.
     
2.9 Until the date on which the distribution of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares is completed or this Agreement is terminated, the Corporation will promptly take, or cause to be taken, all additional steps and proceedings that may from time to time be required under Applicable Securities Laws to continue to qualify the distribution of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares, or in the event that the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares have, for any reason ceased to so qualify, to so qualify again such securities, as applicable, for distribution in the Qualifying Jurisdictions.
   
2.10 The Corporation agrees that the Underwriters will be permitted to appoint other registered dealers (or other dealers duly licensed in their respective jurisdictions) as their agents to assist in the Offering and that the Underwriters may determine the remuneration payable to such other dealers appointed by them. Such remuneration shall be payable by the Underwriters. The Underwriters shall use their commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that such other dealers, if any, comply with Applicable Securities Laws and the securities laws of all other Selling Jurisdictions and the terms of this Agreement as applicable to the Underwriters.
   
2.11 Each Underwriter covenants, represents and warrants to the Corporation that it will comply (and will cause selling group members appointed by it to comply), to the extent applicable to the Underwriters, with the rules and policies of the TSX and with all Applicable Securities Laws and the securities laws of all other Selling Jurisdictions.
   
2.12 The Corporation shall, as soon as practicable after the Prospectus Supplement and any Supplementary Material are prepared, prepare the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum and, forthwith after preparation, any amendment to the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum. The U.S. Private Placement Memorandum shall contain a letter to be completed by Qualified Institutional Buyers or a separate letter to be completed by U.S. Accredited Investors, as applicable, that sets forth the terms and conditions of their potential purchase and the restrictions on transfer, exercise, offer or sale of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, if any.

 

 

- 13 -

 

3.                   REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

 

3.1 The Corporation represents and warrants to the Underwriters, and acknowledges that the Underwriters are relying upon such representations and warranties in entering into this Agreement, that:
   
(a) the Corporation has been duly incorporated and is validly existing under the laws of Canada, has all requisite corporate power and authority and is duly qualified to carry on its business as now conducted and to own, lease or operate its properties and assets and no steps or proceedings have been taken by the Corporation or, to the knowledge of the Corporation, by any Person, voluntary or otherwise, requiring or authorizing the dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Corporation;
     
(b) the Corporation has all requisite corporate power and authority to: (i) issue and sell the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares, and (ii) enter into and carry out its obligations under this Agreement and the Ancillary Documents;
     
(c) the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries are duly registered and licensed to carry on business in the jurisdictions in which they carry on business or own property where required under the laws of that jurisdiction;
     
(d) the only subsidiaries of the Corporation are the Corporation Subsidiaries and the only Corporation Subsidiaries that are material to the Corporation are the Material Corporation Subsidiaries;
     
(e) each Corporation Subsidiary is duly organized and validly existing under the laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation and each has the corporate power to own or lease its property and assets and to carry on the business now being conducted by it or proposed to be conducted;
     
(f) except as disclosed in the Offering Documents, the Corporation is, directly or indirectly, the beneficial owner of all of the issued and outstanding shares in the capital of each Corporation Subsidiary, and holds such shares free and clear of any encumbrances;
     
(g) except as disclosed in the Offering Documents, no Person has any written or oral agreement or option or any right or privilege (whether by law, pre-emptive or contractual) capable of becoming (i) an agreement or option for the purchase or acquisition of any of the shares of the Corporation Subsidiaries or (ii) any agreement for the purchase, subscription, allotment or issuance of any unissued shares or other securities of any of the Corporation Subsidiaries;
     
(h) no proposed acquisition by the Corporation has progressed to a state where a reasonable person would believe that the likelihood of the Corporation completing the acquisition is high and that, if completed by the Corporation at the date of the Prospectus Supplement, would be a "significant acquisition" for the purposes of Applicable Securities Laws in Canada, in each case, that would require the prescribed disclosure in the Prospectus Supplement pursuant to such laws;
     
(i) each of the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries is carrying on its business in material compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations of their respective jurisdiction;

 

 

- 14 -

 

(j) the Corporation is in compliance with its timely and continuous disclosure obligations under the Applicable Securities Laws and the rules, policies and regulations of the TSX and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, there has not occurred any material adverse change, financial or otherwise, in the assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise), business, financial condition or capital of the Corporation or the ability of the Corporation to perform its obligations under this Agreement or the Ancillary Documents which has not been publicly disclosed on a non-confidential basis and all the statements set forth in the Information are true, correct, and complete in all material respects and do not contain any misrepresentation as of the date of such statements and the Corporation has not filed any confidential material change reports since the date of such statements;
     
(k) to the knowledge of the Corporation, none of its directors or officers are currently, or have been in the past, subject to any order or ruling of any securities regulatory authority or stock exchange that currently prohibits, or has prohibited, such individual from acting as a director or officer of a public company or any company listed on a stock exchange;
     
(l) the AIF is in all material respects in the form required by Form 51-102F2 as prescribed by NI 51-102;
     
(m) the Corporation is eligible to file with each of the Qualifying Jurisdictions a prospectus in the form of a short form prospectus under NI 44-101 and a short form prospectus in the form of a base shelf prospectus under NI 44-102, and to otherwise avail itself of the Final Base Shelf Procedures with respect to the distribution of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, and on the date of and upon filing of the Prospectus Supplement there will be no documents required to be filed under the Applicable Securities Laws of the Qualifying Jurisdictions in connection with the Offering that will not have been filed as required;
     
(n) the Final Base Shelf Prospectus complies with, and the Prospectus Supplement and Supplementary Material will, as of their respective dates, comply with, all applicable requirements of Applicable Securities Laws, including NI 44-101 and NI 44-102;
     
(o) the Final Base Shelf Prospectus and, prior thereto, a Preliminary Base Shelf Prospectus (in the English language) regarding the issue and sale of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, have been filed with each of the Commissions, and receipts therefor have been issued by or on behalf of each of the Commissions, which receipts continue to be effective;
     
(p) the representations, warranties and covenants of the Corporation set out in Schedule "A" to this Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference;
     
(q) the Corporation is a reporting issuer under the securities laws of each of the provinces and territories of Canada and is not in default of any requirement of the Applicable Securities Laws and the Corporation is not included on a list of defaulting reporting issuers maintained by the securities regulatory authorities of any of the provinces or territories of Canada;
     
(r) the Common Shares are listed for trading on the TSX and the Corporation has not been noted in default by the TSX of any of the listing requirements of the TSX applicable to the Corporation as of the date hereof, and prior to the Closing Time, the Common Shares issuable pursuant to the Offering will have been conditionally approved for listing on the TSX, subject to fulfillment by the Corporation of the standard listing conditions of the TSX;

 

 

- 15 -

 

(s)
     
(i) (A) the Camino Rojo Technical Report complied in all material respects with the requirements of NI 43-101 at the time of filing thereof and the Camino Rojo Technical Report reasonably presented the quantity of mineral resources and mineral reserves, as applicable, attributable to the properties evaluated therein as at the date stated therein based upon information available at the time the Camino Rojo Technical Report was prepared; and (B) the Corporation made available to the authors of the Camino Rojo Technical Report, prior to the issuance thereof, for the purpose of preparing such reports, all information requested by them, and none of such information contained any misrepresentation at the time such information was so provided;
     
(ii) all of the material assumptions underlying the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates, as applicable, in the Camino Rojo Technical Report are, to the knowledge of the Corporation, reasonable and appropriate and the estimates of mineral resources and mineral reserves as described in the Offering Documents comply in all material respects with Applicable Securities Laws in Canada, subject to current technical reports superseding prior reports;
     
(iii) the information set forth in the Offering Documents relating to mineral resources and mineral reserves required to be disclosed therein pursuant to Applicable Securities Laws in Canada has been prepared by the Corporation and its consultants in accordance with methods generally applied in the mining industry and conforms, in all material respects, to the requirements of Applicable Securities Laws in Canada; and
     
(iv) the Corporation is in compliance in all material respects with the provisions of NI 43-101 and has filed all technical reports required thereby and there has been no change in respect thereof that would require the filing by the Corporation of a new technical report under NI 43-101.
     
(t) the authorized capital of the Corporation consists of an unlimited number of Common Shares, of which 187,192,168 Common Shares are issued and outstanding as of the date of this Agreement, and such outstanding Common Shares are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable, and none of the outstanding shares of the Corporation have been issued in violation of any of the pre-emptive or similar rights of any securityholder of the Corporation or of any other person;
     
(u) except for the Pre-emptive Rights or as disclosed in the Offering Documents or annual equity compensation grants made in the ordinary course, no Person has any agreement, option, warrant, right or privilege (whether pre-emptive, contractual or otherwise) capable of becoming an agreement, option, warrant, right or privilege for the purchase, acquisition, subscription for or issue of any of the unissued shares or other securities of the Corporation or the Corporation Subsidiaries;

 

 

- 16 -

 

(v) upon their issuance against payment of the Purchase Price therefor, the Common Shares comprising the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares will be validly issued and outstanding as fully paid and non-assessable Common Shares of the Corporation;
     
(w) the Transfer Agent, at its principal office in the City of Vancouver, British Columbia, has been duly appointed as registrar and transfer agent in respect of the Common Shares;
     
(x) the minute books of the Corporation made available to counsel for the Underwriters in connection with its due diligence investigation of the Corporation for the periods from January 1, 2018 to the date of examination thereof are all of the minute books of the Corporation and contain the articles of incorporation and by-laws of the Corporation from the date of incorporation and copies of all proceedings (or certified copies thereof) of the shareholders, the boards of directors and all committees of the boards of directors of the Corporation other than those in draft form and there have been no other meetings, resolutions or proceedings of the shareholders, board of directors or any committees of the boards of directors of the Corporation not reflected in such minute books and other records, other than those which are not material in the context of the Corporation as of the date hereof;
     
(y) none of the offering and sale of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the Prospectuses or the Ancillary Documents, the compliance by the Corporation with the provisions of this Agreement, the Prospectuses and the Ancillary Documents or the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein, do or will (i) require the consent, approval, or authorization, order or agreement of, or registration or qualification with, any governmental agency, body or authority, court, stock exchange, securities regulatory authority or other Person, except as have been obtained, or will be obtained on or before the Closing Date, or (ii) conflict with or result in any breach or violation of any of the provisions of, or constitute a default under, any indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, lease or other agreement or instrument to which the Corporation is a party or by which it is bound, or the articles of incorporation or by-laws of the Corporation or any resolution passed by the directors (or any committee thereof) or shareholders of the Corporation, or any judgment, decree or order binding the Corporation or the Properties or assets of the Corporation, or any statute, rule or regulation applicable to the Corporation and in effect as of the date hereof which could have a Material Adverse Effect on the Corporation;
     
(z) except as disclosed in the Offering Documents, the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries hold all requisite licences, registrations, qualifications, permits, consents, applications and other approvals, as applicable, in respect of any Property Rights (collectively, the "Licenses") necessary for carrying on its business as currently carried on, and, except as disclosed in the Offering Documents, all such Licenses are valid and subsisting and in good standing in all material respects except where the failure to hold such Licenses would not have a Material Adverse Effect on the Corporation, and neither the Corporation nor any Material Corporation Subsidiary has received any notice of proceedings relating to the revocation, adverse modification or cancellation of or any intention to revoke, adversely modify or cancel any of the Licenses or any notice of closure in respect of any of the Licenses;
     
(aa) other than pursuant to the Loan Agreement or as disclosed in the Offering Documents, the Corporation or a Corporation Subsidiary is the holder in good standing of all the Licenses free and clear of any encumbrances which would have a Material Adverse Effect on the Corporation, and the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries have no knowledge of any claim of adverse ownership in respect thereof;

 

 

- 17 -

 

 

(bb) the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries are the absolute legal and beneficial owner of, and have good and marketable title to, the Camino Rojo Project, free of all mortgages, liens, charges, pledges, security interests, encumbrances, claims or demands whatsoever, other than those contained in the Loan Agreement or as described in the Offering Documents or the Information, and hold either freehold title, mining leases, mining concessions, mining claims, mining applications or participating interests or other conventional property or proprietary interests or rights (collectively, the "Property Rights"), recognized in Mexico, in respect of the ore bodies and minerals located in the Camino Rojo Project as described in all material respects in the Prospectuses, under valid, subsisting and enforceable documents or recognized and enforceable agreements or instruments, sufficient to permit the Corporation to explore the minerals relating thereto, and the Property Rights for the Camino Rojo Project in which the Corporation has an interest or right have been validly located and recorded in accordance with all applicable laws and are valid and subsisting. Except as disclosed in the Offering Documents, the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries have the necessary surface rights, access rights, authorizations and other necessary rights and interests relating to its Properties granting the Corporation or a Material Corporation Subsidiary, as applicable, the right and ability to explore for minerals, ore and metals for development purposes as are appropriate in view of the rights and interest therein of the Corporation, with only such exceptions as do not materially interfere with the use made by the Corporation and the Material Corporation Subsidiaries of the rights or interest so held, and each of the proprietary interests or rights and each of the documents, agreements and instruments and obligations relating thereto referred to above is currently in good standing in the name of the Corporation or a Material Corporation Subsidiary. The Property Rights in respect of the Properties as disclosed in the Prospectuses constitute a description of all material Property Rights held by the Corporation and the Material Corporation Subsidiaries;
     
(cc) the Properties and Property Rights of the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries in the Cerro Quema Project as disclosed in the Corporation's public record constitute an accurate description of the Properties and all material Property Rights held by the Corporation and the Material Corporation Subsidiaries in the Cerro Quema Project;
     
(dd) except for relinquishment of Property Rights made in the ordinary course, the Properties and Property Rights of the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries, as disclosed in the Prospectuses and the Information, constitute an accurate description of the Properties and all material Property Rights held by the Corporation and the Material Corporation Subsidiaries, and, except as disclosed in the Offering Documents, no other property or assets are necessary for the conduct of the business of the Corporation as currently conducted, except as disclosed in the Offering Documents and the Information, the Corporation does not know of any claim or the basis for any claim that could reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect the right of the Corporation to use, transfer or otherwise explore for mineral deposits on such Properties and, except as disclosed in the Offering Documents and the Information, none of the Corporation nor any of the Material Corporation Subsidiaries has any responsibility or obligation to pay any commission, royalty, licence fee or similar payment to any Person with respect to the Property Rights;

 

 

- 18 -

 

(ee) any and all of the agreements and other documents and instruments pursuant to which the Corporation or the Material Corporation Subsidiaries hold its Properties (including any interest in, or right to earn an interest in, any Properties) are valid and subsisting agreements, documents or instruments in full force and effect, enforceable in accordance with the terms thereof, the Corporation and the Material Corporation Subsidiaries are not in default of any of the material provisions of any such agreements, documents or instruments nor has any such default been alleged, and such Properties are in good standing in all material respects under the applicable statutes and regulations of the jurisdictions in which they are situated, all leases, licences and claims pursuant to which the Corporation derives the interests thereof in such Properties are in good standing in all material respects and there has been no material default under any such lease, licence or claim and all taxes required to be paid with respect to such Properties to the date hereof have been paid. None of the Properties (or any interest in, or right to earn an interest in, any Properties) of the Corporation and the Material Corporation Subsidiaries is subject to any right of first refusal or purchase or acquisition right;
     
(ff) the Corporation and each Material Corporation Subsidiary is in material compliance with all laws and regulations respecting employment and employment practices, terms and conditions of employment, pay equity and wages and the Corporation has not and is not engaged in any unfair labour practice, there is no labour strike, dispute, slowdown, stoppage, complaint or grievance pending or, to the knowledge of the Corporation, threatened against the Corporation or any Material Corporation Subsidiary, no union representation question exists respecting the employees of the Corporation or any Material Corporation Subsidiary and no collective bargaining agreement is in place or currently being negotiated by the Corporation or any Material Corporation Subsidiary and there are no outstanding orders under employment or human rights legislation in any jurisdiction in which the Corporation or the Corporation Subsidiaries carry on business or have employees, and all benefit and pension plans of the Corporation and any Material Corporation Subsidiary, as applicable, are funded in accordance with applicable laws;
     
(gg) all material accruals for unpaid vacation pay, premiums for unemployment insurance, health premiums, federal or provincial pension plan premiums, accrued wages, salaries and commissions and payments for any plan for any officer, director, employee or consultant of the Corporation or any Material Corporation Subsidiary have been accurately reflected in the books and records of the Corporation;
     
(hh) there has not been in the last three years and there is not currently any labour disruption or conflict which could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Corporation as a whole;
     
(ii) except as mandated by the government, which government mandates have not materially affected the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries, as at the date of this Agreement, there has been no closure, suspension or disruption to, the operations or workforce productivity of the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries as a result of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak (the "COVID-19 Outbreak"). The Corporation has been monitoring the COVID-19 Outbreak and the potential impact at all of its operations and has put appropriate control measures in place to ensure the wellness of all of its employees and surrounding communities where the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries operate while continuing to operate;

 

 

- 19 -

 

(jj) neither the Corporation nor any Material Corporation Subsidiary has any responsibility or obligation to pay or have paid on its behalf any material commission, royalty or similar payment to any person with respect to its Property Rights as of the date hereof, other than a 4% net smelter royalty payable to the Government of Panama with respect to the Cerro Quema Project, a 2% net smelter royalty pursuant to the Camino APA and a 3% net smelter royalty pursuant to the Mountain Gold Lease or otherwise as disclosed in the Technical Reports;
     
(kk) the Corporation and the Material Corporation Subsidiaries are in compliance in all respects with all material terms and provisions of all Material Contracts, and all such Material Contracts are valid and binding against the Corporation or the Material Corporation Subsidiaries in accordance with their terms and are in full force and effect, and no breach or default by the Corporation or the Material Corporation Subsidiaries or event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, could constitute a material breach or material default by the Corporation, exists with respect thereto;
     
(ll) all necessary corporate action has been taken or will have been taken prior to the Closing Time by the Corporation so as to validly issue the Common Shares (including upon exercise of the Over-Allotment Option) as fully paid and non-assessable common shares of the Corporation;
     
(mm) the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance of the transactions contemplated hereby, including the execution and delivery of any Ancillary Documents related thereto, have been authorized by all necessary corporate action of the Corporation and upon the execution and delivery thereof shall constitute valid and legally binding obligations of the Corporation enforceable against the Corporation, in accordance with their terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally and except as limited by the application of equitable remedies which may be granted in the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction and that the enforcement of the rights to indemnity, contribution and waiver of contribution set out in this Agreement may be limited by applicable law;
     
(nn) at the Closing Time, all consents, approvals, permits, authorizations, exemptions or filings as may be required under Applicable Securities Laws necessary for the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the issuance and sale of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby have been made or obtained, as applicable, other than filings required to be submitted within the applicable time frame pursuant to Applicable Securities Laws;
     
(oo) the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance by the Corporation of its obligations hereunder, the issue and sale of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby do not and will not conflict with or result in a breach or violation of any of the terms of or provisions of, or constitute a default under, whether after notice or lapse of time or both, (i) any statute, rule or regulation applicable to the Corporation and, if applicable, the Corporation Subsidiaries, including Applicable Securities Laws; (ii) the constating documents, articles or resolutions of the Corporation and, if applicable, the Corporation Subsidiaries, which are in effect at the date hereof; (iii) any material contract, mortgage or indenture to which the Corporation and, if applicable, the Corporation Subsidiaries, are party or by which they are bound; or (iv) any judgment, decree or order binding the Corporation and, if applicable, the Corporation Subsidiaries, or the property or assets of the Corporation and, if applicable, its Corporation Subsidiaries;

 

 

- 20 -

 

(pp) the assets of the Corporation and each Corporation Subsidiary and the business and operations thereof are insured against loss or damage with responsible third-party insurers on a basis consistent with insurance obtained by reasonably prudent participants in comparable businesses, and such coverage is in full force and effect, and the Corporation and each Corporation Subsidiary has not failed to promptly give any notice of any claim thereunder;
     
(qq) the Corporation Financial Statements, which are incorporated by reference in the Prospectus Supplement, have been prepared in conformity with IFRS applied on a consistent basis throughout the periods involved and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Corporation at the dates thereof, the financial performance and cash flows of the Corporation for the periods then ended, in accordance with IFRS;
     
(rr) at all relevant times the Corporation's auditors who audited the Corporation Financial Statements are and have been independent public accountants as required under Applicable Securities Laws in Canada and there has never been a reportable event (within the meaning of NI 51-102) between the Corporation and any of the Corporation's current or former auditors nor has there been any event which has led any of the Corporation's current or former auditors to threaten to resign as auditors;
     
(ss) no order preventing, ceasing or suspending trading in any securities of the Corporation or prohibiting the issue of securities by the Corporation has been issued by any regulatory authorities and remains outstanding and no proceedings for either of such purposes have been instituted or threatened, or to the best of the knowledge of the Corporation, are pending or contemplated by any regulatory authorities;
     
(tt) the Corporation maintains a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that: (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management's general or specific authorizations; (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS and to maintain asset accountability; (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management's general or specific authorization; and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences;
     
(uu) there are no material liabilities of the Corporation, whether direct, indirect, absolute, contingent or otherwise which are not disclosed or reflected in the Corporation Financial Statements or the related management's discussion and analysis except those incurred in the ordinary course of business since December 31, 2019;
     
(vv) since December 31, 2019, and excluding expenditures in the ordinary course of business, there has not been any adverse material change of any kind whatsoever in the financial position or condition of the Corporation or any damage, loss or other change of any kind whatsoever in circumstances materially affecting its business or assets, taken as a whole, or the right or capacity of it to carry on its business, such business having been carried on in the ordinary course;

 

 

- 21 -

 

(ww) neither the Corporation nor any of the Corporation Subsidiaries has committed an act of bankruptcy or sought protection from the creditors thereof before any court or pursuant to any legislation, proposed a compromise or arrangement to the creditors thereof generally, taken any proceeding with respect to a compromise or arrangement, taken any proceeding to be declared bankrupt or wound up, taken any proceeding to have a receiver appointed of any of the assets thereof, had any Person holding any encumbrance, lien, charge, hypothec, pledge, mortgage, title retention agreement or other security interest or receiver take possession of any of the property thereof, had an execution or distress become enforceable or levied upon any portion of the property thereof or had any petition for a receiving order in bankruptcy filed against it;
     
(xx) except as disclosed to the Underwriters or as disclosed in the Offering Documents, none of the Corporation or any Corporation Subsidiary has approved, is contemplating, has entered into any agreement in respect of, or has knowledge of, as applicable:

 

(i) the purchase of any material property or assets or any interest therein or the sale, transfer or other disposition of any material property or assets or any interest therein currently owned, directly or indirectly, by the Corporation or any Corporation Subsidiary whether by asset sale, transfer of shares or otherwise;
     
(ii) the change of control (by sale or transfer of shares or sale of all or substantially all of the property and assets of the Corporation or any Corporation Subsidiary or otherwise) of the Corporation or any Corporation Subsidiary; or
     
(iii) a proposed or planned disposition of shares by any shareholder who owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the outstanding shares of the Corporation;

 

(yy) the Layback LOI is in good standing in accordance with its terms and the Corporation is not aware of any facts or circumstances that would cause it to believe that (i) the Layback LOI will be terminated; (ii) the Corporation will not be able to enter into the Layback Agreement; (iii) the transactions contemplated by the Layback LOI will not be completed pursuant to the Layback Agreement on substantially the same terms and conditions as set out in the Layback LOI; or (iv) the benefits to the Corporation of the transactions contemplated by the Layback LOI will not be realized;
     
(zz) the directors, officers and key employees of the Corporation and the compensation arrangements with respect to the Named Executive Officers are as disclosed in all material respects in the Prospectuses and, except as disclosed therein, there are no pensions, profit sharing, group insurance or similar plans or other deferred compensation plans of any kind whatsoever materially affecting the Corporation;

 

(aaa) all contracts and agreements material to the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries other than those entered into in the ordinary course of business and its business as presently conducted and taken as a whole (collectively the "Material Contracts") have been disclosed in the Prospectuses or the Information;
     
(bbb) all taxes (including income tax, capital tax, payroll taxes, employer health tax, workers' compensation payments, property taxes, customs and land transfer taxes), duties, royalties, levies, imposts, assessments, deductions, charges or withholdings and all liabilities with respect thereto including any penalty and interest payable with respect thereto (collectively, "Taxes") due and payable by the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries have been paid. All tax returns, declarations, remittances and filings required to be filed by the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries have been filed with all appropriate governmental authorities and all such returns, declarations, remittances and filings are complete and accurate and no material fact or facts have been omitted therefrom which would make any of them misleading. To the knowledge of the Corporation, no examination of any tax return of the Corporation or the Corporation Subsidiaries is currently in progress and there are no material issues or disputes outstanding with any governmental authority respecting any taxes that have been paid, or may be payable, by the Corporation or the Corporation Subsidiaries;

 

 

- 22 -

 

(ccc) the Corporation has established on its books and records reserves that are adequate for the payment of all Taxes not yet due and payable and there are no liens for Taxes on the assets of the Corporation and, to the knowledge of the Corporation, there are no audits pending of the tax returns of the Corporation (whether federal, state, provincial, local or foreign) and there are no claims which have been or may be asserted relating to any such tax returns, which audits and claims, if determined adversely, would result in the assertion by any governmental agency of any deficiency that would result in a Material Adverse Effect on the Corporation;
     
(ddd) none of the Corporation nor any of the Corporation Subsidiaries, nor, to the knowledge of the Corporation, any other Person associated with or acting on behalf of the Corporation or any Corporation Subsidiary, including, without limitation, any director, officer, agent or employee of the Corporation or the Corporation Subsidiaries (i) used any corporate funds for unlawful contributions, gifts, entertainment or other unlawful expenses relating to political activity; (ii) made any unlawful payment to foreign or domestic government officials or employees or to foreign or domestic political parties or campaigns from corporate funds; (iii) violated any provision of the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (Canada) (the "CFPOA"); or (iv) made any other unlawful payment; and the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries will monitor their respective businesses to ensure compliance with the CFPOA and, if violations of the CFPOA are found, will take remedial action to remedy such violations;
     
(eee) there are no actions, suits, proceedings or inquiries pending or, to the knowledge of the Corporation, threatened against or affecting the Corporation at law or in equity or before or by any Governmental Authority, domestic or foreign, which in any way has or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, nor are there any matters under discussion with any Governmental Authority relating to taxes, governmental charges, orders or assessments asserted by any such authority, and, to the Corporation's knowledge, there are no facts or circumstances which would reasonably be expected to form the basis for any such litigation, governmental or other proceeding or investigation, which, in each case, if determined adversely to the Corporation, would individually or in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect, or which adversely affects or may adversely affect the distribution of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares or which would impair the ability of the Corporation to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby or to duly observe and perform any of its covenants or obligations contained herein;
     
(fff) except as disclosed in the Prospectuses, none of the directors, officers or employees of the Corporation, any person who owns, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of any class of Common Shares of the Corporation or securities of any person exchangeable for more than 10% of any class of securities of the Corporation, or any associate or affiliate of any of the foregoing, had or has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction or any proposed transaction (including any loan made to or by any such person) with the Corporation which, as the case may be, materially affects, is material to or will materially affect the Corporation;

 

 

- 23 -

 

(ggg) except to the extent that any violation or other matter referred to in this subsection does not have a Material Adverse Effect on the Corporation, taken as a whole:

 

(i) the Corporation and the Material Corporation Subsidiaries are not currently in violation of any Environmental Laws;
     
(ii) to the knowledge of the Corporation, the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries have operated its business at all times and has received, handled, used, stored, treated, shipped and disposed of all Contaminants without violation of Environmental Laws;
     
(iii) there have been no material spills, releases, deposits or discharges of hazardous or toxic substances, Contaminants or wastes into the earth, air or into any body of water or any municipal or other sewer or drain water systems by the Corporation or any of the Material Corporation Subsidiaries that have not been remedied;
     
(iv) as a result of its operations, no orders, rulings, directions or notices have been issued and remain outstanding or to the knowledge of the Corporation are pending or threatened against the Corporation or any Material Corporation Subsidiary under or pursuant to any Environmental Laws;
     
(v) neither the Corporation nor any Material Corporation Subsidiary has knowledge of, and has not received any notice of, any claim, judicial or administrative proceeding, pending or threatened against it which may materially adversely affect the Corporation or the Material Corporation Subsidiaries relating to or alleging any material violation of Environmental Laws by the Corporation or the Material Corporation Subsidiaries and the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries are not aware of any facts which could give rise to any such claim or judicial or administrative proceeding and the Corporation or the Material Corporation Subsidiaries, to the knowledge of the Corporation, is not the subject of any investigation, evaluation, audit or review by any Governmental Authority to determine whether any material violation of Environmental Laws by it has occurred or is occurring or whether any remedial action is needed;
     
(vi) to the knowledge of the Corporation, the Corporation and the Material Corporation Subsidiaries have not failed to report to the proper Governmental Authority the occurrence of any event which is required to be so reported by any Environmental Law;
     
(vii) the Corporation has not failed to report to the proper federal, provincial, municipal or other political subdivision, government, department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, the occurrence of any event which is required to be so reported by any Environmental Laws; and
     
(viii) the Corporation and the Material Corporation Subsidiaries hold all licences, permits and approvals required under any Environmental Laws in connection with the operation of its business as currently conducted and the ownership and use of its assets, all such licences, permits and approvals are in full force and effect, and the Corporation and the Material Corporation Subsidiaries have not received any notification pursuant to any Environmental Laws that any material work, repairs, constructions or capital expenditures are required to be made by it as a condition of continued compliance with any Environmental Laws, or any licence, permit or approval issued pursuant thereto, or that any license, permit or approval referred to above is about to be reviewed, made subject to material limitations or conditions, revoked, withdrawn or terminated;

 

 

- 24 -

 

(hhh) none of the Properties are subject to any claim by any indigenous group and neither the Corporation nor the Material Corporation Subsidiaries is a party to any material disputes with any indigenous groups, nor has the Corporation or any Material Corporation Subsidiary received notice of any legal proceedings with respect to any indigenous land claims in respect of the Properties;
     
(iii) the Corporation and each Material Corporation Subsidiary has conducted and is conducting its business in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations of each jurisdiction in which it carries on business (including, without limitation, all applicable federal, provincial, municipal and local environmental anti-pollution and licensing laws, regulations and other lawful requirements of any governmental or regulatory body) and has not received a notice of non-compliance, or knows of, or has reasonable grounds to know of, any facts that could give rise to a notice of non-compliance with any such laws or regulations which would have a Material Adverse Effect on the Corporation;
     
(jjj) other than with respect to a proposed environmental tax in Zacatecas, Mexico, neither the Corporation nor the Corporation Subsidiaries are aware of any pending change or contemplated change to any applicable law or regulation or governmental position that would have a Material Adverse Effect on business of the Corporation or the business or legal environment under which the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries operate;
     
(kkk) other than the Underwriters pursuant to this Agreement and their respective representatives, including selling group members, there is no person acting or purporting to act at the request of the Corporation who is entitled to any brokerage, agency or other fiscal advisory or similar fee in connection with the transactions contemplated herein;
     
(lll) all information which has been prepared by the Corporation relating to the Corporation, the Corporation Subsidiaries and their respective businesses, properties and liabilities and made available to the Underwriters, including all financial and operational information provided to the Underwriters was, as of the date of such information and is as of the date hereof, true and correct in all material respects, taken as a whole, and no fact or facts have been omitted therefrom which would make such information materially misleading;
     
(mmm) the operations of the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries are, and have been conducted at all times, in compliance with the financial recordkeeping and reporting requirements of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (Canada), the anti-money laundering statutes of all jurisdictions to which they are subject, the rules and regulations thereunder and any related or similar rules, regulations or guidelines, issued, administered or enforced by any governmental agency (collectively, the "Anti-Money Laundering Laws") and no action, suit or proceeding by or before any Governmental Authority or any arbitrator involving the Corporation or the Corporation Subsidiaries with respect to the Anti-Money Laundering Laws is pending or, to the knowledge of the Corporation, threatened;

 

 

- 25 -

 

(nnn) the form and the terms of the certificates for or electronic forms of, as applicable, the Common Shares have been approved by the Board of Directors, comply with all legal and stock exchange requirements and do not conflict with the Corporation's articles or by-laws;
     
(ooo) the provisions of the Common Shares conform, in all material respects, with the description thereof contained in the Final Base Shelf Prospectus under the heading "Description of Securities";
     
(ppp) on the date of issue, the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares will be qualified investments under the Tax Act and the regulations thereunder as in effect on the date hereof, for a trust governed by a registered retirement savings plan, a registered retirement income fund, a deferred profit sharing plan, a registered education savings plan, a registered disability savings plan and a tax-free savings account each as defined in the Tax Act, subject to the specific provisions of any such plan, but would be a prohibited investment for a trust governed by a tax-free savings account if the holder has a significant interest in the Corporation within the meaning of the Tax Act; and
     
(qqq) the Prospectuses, including any and all Supplementary Material, contain, or will contain, as applicable, no misrepresentation and, together with all of the information incorporated by reference in the Prospectuses, constitute, or will constitute, as applicable, full, true and plain disclosure of all material facts relating to the Corporation, the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares (excluding information and statements relating solely to the Underwriters and/or provided in writing by the Underwriters) and comply, or will comply, as applicable, in all material respects with Applicable Securities Laws.

 

3.2 The representations and warranties of the Corporation contained in this Agreement shall be true at the Closing Time as though they were made at the Closing Time and they shall survive the completion of the transactions contemplated under this Agreement and remain in full force and effect thereafter for the benefit of the Underwriters for the longer of the period of two years following the Closing Date and the date on which any applicable statutory prospectus liability could apply.
   
3.3 Each Underwriter severally, and not jointly, nor jointly and severally, represents and warrants to the Corporation, and acknowledges that the Corporation is relying upon such representations and warranties in entering into this Agreement, that:

 

(a) it is, and will remain so until the completion of the Offering, appropriately registered under Applicable Securities Laws so as to permit it to lawfully fulfil its obligations hereunder and it is, and will remain so until the completion of the Offering, a member in good standing of the TSX;
     
(b) it will sell (and cause selling group members to sell) the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares in accordance with Applicable Securities Laws and this Agreement and applicable securities laws in Selling Jurisdictions other than the Qualifying Jurisdictions; and
     
(c) it has good and sufficient right and authority to enter into this Agreement and complete the transactions contemplated under this Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein.

 

 

- 26 -

 

3.4 The representations and warranties of the Underwriters contained in this Agreement shall be true at the Closing Time as though they were made at the Closing Time and shall survive the completion of the transactions contemplated under this Agreement.

 

4. ADDITIONAL COVENANTS

 

4.1 The Corporation covenants and agrees with the Underwriters that it shall:

 

(a) file or cause to be filed with the TSX all required documents and pay all required filing fees, and do or cause to be done all things required by the rules and policies of the TSX, in order to obtain prior to the Closing Date the requisite acceptance or approval of the TSX for: (i) the Offering; and (ii) the conditional listing of the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares subject only to satisfaction by the Corporation of the standard listing conditions of the TSX, and the Corporation shall thereafter fulfill such listing conditions, if any, within the time period prescribed by the TSX;
     
(b) with respect to the filing of the Prospectus Supplement as contemplated herein, fulfil all legal and regulatory requirements required to be fulfilled by the Corporation in connection therewith, in each case in form and substance satisfactory to the Underwriters as evidenced by the Underwriters' execution of the certificate attached thereto;
     
(c) prior to the completion of the Offering, the Underwriters, their legal counsel and technical consultants will be provided with timely access to all information required to permit them to conduct a full due diligence investigation of the Corporation and its business operations, properties, assets, affairs, prospects and financial condition. In particular, the Underwriters shall be permitted to conduct all due diligence that they may, in their sole discretion, require in order to fulfil their obligations under Applicable Securities Laws, and in that regard, the Corporation will make available to the Underwriters, their legal counsel and technical consultants, on a timely basis, all corporate and operating records, contracts, resource and reserve reports, technical reports, feasibility studies, financial information, transaction record books, current budgets, current forecasts, reports, key officers, as applicable, and other relevant documentation or information necessary in order to complete the due diligence investigation of the Corporation, and its business operations, properties, assets, affairs, prospects and financial condition for this purpose, and without limiting the scope of the due diligence inquiries the Underwriters may conduct, to participate in one or more due diligence sessions to be held prior to the Closing Time at which management of the Corporation, the Former Auditors, the legal counsel of the Corporation and representatives of the authors of the Camino Rojo Technical Reports, shall participate. It shall be a condition to (i) the Underwriters' execution of any certificate in any Offering Document that the Underwriters be satisfied as to the form and substance of the document, and (ii) the delivery of each U.S. Private Placement Memorandum to any purchaser or prospective purchaser that the Underwriters and their U.S. Affiliates be satisfied as to the form and substance of such document;
     
(d) during the period prior to the completion of the Offering, promptly notify the Underwriters in writing of any material change (actual, contemplated or threatened) in the business, affairs, operations, assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise), financial position or capital of the Corporation, taken as a whole, or of any change which is of such a nature as to result in a misrepresentation in either of the Prospectuses or any Supplementary Material and the Corporation shall, within any applicable time limitation, comply with all filing and other requirements under the Applicable Securities Laws, as a result of any such change; provided, however, notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation shall not file any Supplementary Material without first obtaining the approval of the Underwriters as to the form and content thereof, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld and shall be provided on a timely basis; and, in addition to the foregoing, the Corporation shall, in good faith, discuss with the Underwriters any change in circumstances (actual or proposed) which is of such a nature that there is or ought to be consideration given by the Corporation as to whether notice in writing of such change need be given to the Underwriters pursuant to this subparagraph;

 

 

- 27 -

 

(e) During the period from the date of this Agreement to the date of completion of the Offering, the Corporation will promptly provide to the Underwriters, for review by the Underwriters and their counsel, prior to filing with the Commissions:

 

(i) any financial statements of the Corporation;
     
(ii) any proposed document (including without limitation any amendment to, or any new, annual information form, financial statement, management's discussion and analysis, business acquisition report, material change report, news release or information circular) which may be incorporated, or deemed to be incorporated, by reference in the Prospectus Supplement; and
     
(iii) any press release of the Corporation.

 

(f) deliver to the Underwriters duly executed copies of any Supplementary Material required to be filed by the Corporation in accordance with subparagraph (d) above and, if any financial or accounting information is contained in any of the Supplementary Material, an additional Comfort Letter to that required by Section 4.1(n)(i) below;
     
(g) cause commercial copies of the Prospectus Supplement (including the Final Base Shelf Prospectus), the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum and Supplementary Material to be delivered to the Underwriters without charge, in such quantities and in such cities as the Underwriters may reasonably request, as soon as possible after the filing of the Prospectus Supplement, but in any event on or before 12:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on the day after such filing, as applicable, and such delivery will constitute the Corporation's consent to the Underwriters' use of such documents in connection with the Offering;
     
(h) by the act of having delivered each of the Prospectus Supplement (including the Final Base Shelf Prospectus), the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum and any Supplementary Material to the Underwriters, have represented and warranted to the Underwriters that all material information and statements (except information and statements relating solely to the Underwriters and provided by the Underwriters to the Corporation in writing expressly for inclusion in the Prospectuses) contained in such documents, at the respective dates of initial delivery thereof, comply with the Applicable Securities Laws and are true and correct in all material respects and in light of the circumstances in which they were made, and that such documents, at such dates, contain no misrepresentation and together constitute full, true and plain disclosure of all material facts relating to the Corporation, the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares as required by the Applicable Securities Laws and in light of the circumstances in which they were made;

 

 

- 28 -

 

(i) prior to the Closing Time, fulfil to the satisfaction of the Underwriters, acting reasonably, all legal requirements (including, without limitation, compliance with Applicable Securities Laws) to be fulfilled by the Corporation to enable the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares to be distributed free of trade restrictions in the Qualifying Jurisdictions, subject only to the requirements of Applicable Securities Laws;
     
(j) except to the extent the Corporation participates in a merger, amalgamation or other form of business combination or going private transaction which results in the Corporation ceasing to be a "reporting issuer", use its commercially reasonable efforts to maintain its status as a "reporting issuer" not in default in each of the Qualifying Jurisdictions for a period of two years from the Closing Date;
     
(k) except to the extent the Corporation participates in a merger, amalgamation or other form of business combination or going private transaction which results in the Corporation ceasing to be listed on the TSX, use its commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the listing of its Common Shares on the TSX or such other recognized stock exchange for a period of two years from the Closing Date;
     
(l) the net proceeds of the Offering shall be used by the Corporation substantially in accordance with the disclosure set out under "Use of Proceeds" (and subject to the qualifications stated therein) in the Prospectus Supplement;
     
(m) perform all of the obligations to be performed by it under this Agreement;
     
(n) deliver or cause to be delivered to the Underwriters and their legal counsel, as applicable:

 

(i) at the time of execution of the Prospectus Supplement by the Underwriters, a long-form comfort letter (the "Comfort Letter") from the Former Auditors, addressed to the Underwriters and to the directors of the Corporation and dated as of the date of the Prospectus Supplement, in form and content acceptable to the Underwriters, acting reasonably, to the effect that they have carried out certain procedures performed for the purposes of comparing certain specified financial information and percentages appearing in the Prospectus Supplement and the documents incorporated therein by reference with indicated amounts in the financial statements or accounting records of the Corporation and have found such information and percentages to be in agreement, which comfort letter shall be based on the Former Auditors' reviews having a cut off date of not more than two Business Days prior to the date of the Prospectus Supplement;

 

 

- 29 -

 

(ii) at the Closing Time, favourable legal opinions addressed to the Underwriters from Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP ("Cassels"), Canadian counsel to the Corporation, who may rely on, or, alternatively, provide directly to the Underwriters, the opinions of local counsel as to matters in jurisdictions other than in which Cassels is qualified to practice (the "Legal Opinions"), dated and delivered on the Closing Date, in form and substance satisfactory to the Underwriters, acting reasonably, and subject to and containing necessary assumptions, qualifications and reliances, with respect to the following matters:

 

(A) the Corporation is a "reporting issuer", or its equivalent, in each of the Qualifying Jurisdictions and it is not listed as in default of any requirement of the Applicable Securities laws in any of the Qualifying Jurisdictions;
     
(B) the Corporation meets the criteria and has complied with the requirements of NI 44-101 and NI 44-102 so as to allow it to offer the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares using a short form prospectus in the form of a base shelf prospectus;
     
(C) the Corporation is a corporation duly incorporated and validly existing and is in good standing under the federal laws of Canada and has all requisite corporate power and capacity to carry on its business as now conducted as described in the Final Base Shelf Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement and to own, lease and operate its property and assets;
     
(D) the authorized and issued and outstanding share capital of the Corporation;
     
(E) the Corporation has the necessary corporate power and capacity to execute and deliver the Final Base Shelf Prospectus and the Prospectus Supplement and all necessary corporate action has been taken by or on behalf of the Corporation to authorize the execution and delivery by it of each of the Final Base Shelf Prospectus and the Prospectus Supplement and the filing thereof, as the case may be, in each of the Qualifying Jurisdictions under the Applicable Securities Laws;
     
(F) the Corporation has the requisite corporate power and capacity to execute and deliver this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder;
     
(G) (i) the Purchased Shares have been validly issued by the Corporation as fully paid and non-assessable common shares in the capital of the Corporation, and (ii) the Additional Shares issuable on exercise of the Over-Allotment Option will, upon exercise of the Over-Allotment Option and payment of the Purchase Price therefor, be validly issued by the Corporation as fully paid and non-assessable common shares in the capital of the Corporation;
     
(H) the Additional Shares have been duly allotted and reserved for issuance by the Corporation;
     
(I) all necessary corporate action has been taken by the Corporation to authorize the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance by the Corporation of its obligations hereunder and to authorize the issuance, sale and delivery of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares and the grant of the Over-Allotment Option;
     
(J) this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Corporation and constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Corporation enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and subject to such other standard assumptions and qualifications including the qualifications that equitable remedies may be granted in the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction and that enforcement of rights to indemnity, contribution and waiver of contribution may be limited by applicable law;

 

 

- 30 -

 

(K) the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares are accurately summarized in all material respects in the Final Base Shelf Prospectus;
     
(L) all necessary documents have been filed, all requisite proceedings have been taken and all approvals, permits and consents of the appropriate regulatory authority in each of the Qualifying Jurisdictions where purchasers reside have been obtained by the Corporation to qualify the distribution to the public of the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares in each of the Qualifying Jurisdictions through persons who are registered under Applicable Securities Laws and who have complied with the relevant provisions of Applicable Securities Laws;
     
(M) the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares have been conditionally approved, or approved, for listing on the TSX, subject only to the standard listing conditions of the TSX;
     
(N) the form and terms of the definitive certificates representing the Common Shares have been approved by the board of directors of the Corporation and comply in all material respects with the Canada Business Corporations Act, the by-laws of the Corporation and the rules, by-laws and policies of the TSX;
     
(O) the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the fulfilment of the terms hereof by the Corporation and the offering, issuance, sale and delivery of the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares and the grant of the Over-Allotment Option do not and will not result in a breach of or default under, and do not and will note create a state of facts which, after notice or lapse of time or both, will result in a breach of or default under, and do not and will not conflict with any of: (A) any statute, rule or regulation applicable to the Corporation; or (B) the constating documents of the Corporation or any resolutions of the directors (or any committee thereof) or shareholders of the Corporation;
     
(P) Computershare Investor Services Inc. has been duly appointed as the transfer agent and registrar for the Common Shares; and
     
(Q) the statements in the Prospectus Supplement under the heading "Eligibility for Investment" in so far as they purport to describe the provisions of the laws referred to therein, are fair and accurate summaries of the matters described therein;

 

(iii) at the Closing Time, a favourable legal opinion from local counsel to each of the Material Corporation Subsidiaries, as to (i) the incorporation and existence of each of the Material Corporation Subsidiaries; (ii) the ability of each of the Material Corporation Subsidiaries to carry on its business as presently carried on and to own, lease and operate its properties and assets; (iii) the authorized capital and issued and outstanding share capital of each of the Material Corporation Subsidiaries; and (iv) the ownership of the issued and outstanding securities of each of the Material Corporation Subsidiaries, in form and substance acceptable to the Underwriters, acting reasonably;

 

 

- 31 -

 

(iv) at the Closing Time, favourable legal opinions addressed to the Underwriters, in form and substance satisfactory to the Underwriters, acting reasonably, dated as of the Closing Date, from local counsel to the Corporation with respect to title matters in respect of the Camino Rojo Project (the "Camino Rojo Project Title Opinions");
     
(v) at the Closing Time, pursuant to the Corporation's commercially reasonable efforts, favourable legal opinions addressed to the Underwriters, in form and substance satisfactory to the Underwriters, acting reasonably, dated as of the Closing Date, from local counsel to the Corporation with respect to title matters in respect of the Cerro Quema Project or, failing that, a written assurance from local counsel to the Corporation confirming that the mineral concessions in respect of the Cerro Quema Project remain in good standing.
     
(vi) at the Closing Time, a certificate of compliance (or equivalent) for the Corporation dated within two (2) days of the Closing Date;
     
(vii) at the Closing Time, a certificate (the "Officers' Certificate") of the Corporation signed by its President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, on behalf of the Corporation, addressed to the Underwriters and their legal counsel and dated as of the Closing Date in form and content acceptable to the Underwriters, acting reasonably, relating to the representations and warranties contained in this Agreement and such other items considered reasonable for a transaction of this nature, including with respect to the following matters;

 

(A) no order, ruling or determination having the effect of ceasing the trading or suspending the sale of the Common Shares or any other securities of the Corporation has been issued by any regulatory authority and is continuing in effect and no proceedings for such purpose have been instituted or are pending or, to the knowledge of such officers, contemplated or threatened under any Applicable Securities Laws or by any regulatory authority;
     
(B) since the date of the Prospectus Supplement (a) there has been no material adverse change (actual, anticipated, contemplated or, to the knowledge of the Corporation, threatened, whether financial or otherwise) in the business, affairs, operations, assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise) or capital of the Corporation on a consolidated basis, and (b) no transaction has been entered into by the Corporation which is material to the Corporation, other than in the ordinary course of business;

 

 

- 32 -

 

(C) the representations and warranties of the Corporation in this Agreement are true and correct in all material respects as if made at and as of the Closing Time, except for such representations and warranties which are in respect of a specific date in which case such representations and warranties shall be true and correct in all material respects as of such date, after giving effect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
     
(D) the Corporation has complied with all the covenants and satisfied all the terms and conditions of this Agreement on its part to be complied with and satisfied at or prior to the Closing Time;
     
(E) since the date of the Prospectus Supplement, there has been no change in any material fact (which includes the disclosure of any previously undisclosed material fact) contained in the Final Base Shelf Prospectus or Prospectus Supplement which fact or change is of such a nature as to render any statement in the Final Base Shelf Prospectus or Prospectus Supplement misleading or untrue in any material respect or which would result in a misrepresentation in the Final Base Shelf Prospectus or Prospectus Supplement or which would result in the Final Base Shelf Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement not complying in all material respects with Applicable Securities Laws;

 

(viii) at the Closing Time, a certificate dated the Closing Date signed by the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation or another officer acceptable to the Underwriters, in form and substance acceptable to the Underwriters, with respect to:

 

(A) the constating documents of the Corporation;
     
(B) the resolutions of the directors of the Corporation relevant to the Offering, including the allotment, issue (or reservation for issue) and sale of the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares, the grant of the Over-Allotment Option, the authorization of this Agreement, the listing of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares on the TSX and the other agreements and transactions contemplated by this Agreement; and
     
(C) the incumbency and signatures of signing officers of the Corporation;

 

(ix) at the Closing Time, if any Purchased Shares and/or Additional Shares are sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. Persons, the Corporation shall cause a customary and favourable legal opinion to be delivered by Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP, United States counsel to the Corporation, such opinion(s) to be subject to such customary qualifications and assumptions as the Underwriters may agree, acting reasonably, to the effect that no registration of the Purchased Shares and/or any Additional Shares, as applicable, will be required under the U.S. Securities Act in connection with the offer and sale of the Purchased Shares and/or the Additional Shares that actually take place in the United States, provided that the offer and sale of the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares in the United States is made in accordance with and reliance upon Schedule "A" hereto and the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum (and any executed exhibits, schedules or attachments thereto), it being understood that such counsel may rely, to the extent appropriate in the circumstances, as to matters of fact on certificates of officers of the Corporation and others, and it being further understood that such counsel shall not be required to provide any legal opinion with regard to the subsequent transfer, resale, pledge, exchange, or other disposition of any of the Purchased Shares or the Additional Shares;

 

 

- 33 -

 

(x) at the Closing Time, a "bring down" of the Comfort Letter (the "Bring-Down Letter") required by Section 4.1(n)(i), dated the Closing Date, in form and substance satisfactory to the Underwriters, acting reasonably, confirming the continued accuracy of the Comfort Letter with such changes as may be necessary to bring the information in such letter forward to at least two (2) Business Days prior to the Closing Date, which changes shall be acceptable to the Underwriters, acting reasonably; and
     
(xi) at the Closing Time, such other materials (the "Closing Materials") as the Underwriters may reasonably require and as are customary in a transaction of this nature, and the Closing Materials will be addressed to the Underwriters and to such parties as may be reasonably directed by the Underwriters and will be dated as of the Closing Date or such other date as the Underwriters may reasonably require;

 

(o) from and including the date of this Agreement through to and including the Closing Time, use commercially reasonable efforts to do all such acts and things necessary to ensure that all of the representations and warranties of the Corporation contained in this Agreement or any certificates or documents delivered by it pursuant to this Agreement remain materially true and correct and not do any such act or thing that would render any representation or warranty of the Corporation contained in this Agreement or any certificates or documents delivered by it pursuant to this Agreement materially untrue or incorrect;
     
(p) subject to compliance with Applicable Securities Law, any press release of the Corporation relating to the Offering will be provided in advance to the Lead Underwriter on behalf of the Underwriters, and the Corporation will agree to the form and substance thereof with the Lead Underwriter on behalf of the Underwriters, each acting reasonably, prior to the release thereof;
     
(q) commencing on March 26, 2020 and ending on the date which is 90 days following the Closing Date not to, directly or indirectly, issue, sell, offer, grant an option or right in respect of, or otherwise dispose of, or agree to or announce any intention to issue, sell, offer, grant an option or right in respect of, or otherwise dispose of, any additional Common Shares or any securities exercisable for or convertible into or exchangeable for Common Shares, without the prior written consent of the Lead Underwriter, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, other than pursuant to:

 

(i) the Offering;
     
(ii) the grant or exercise of stock options and other similar issuances pursuant to any stock option plan of the Corporation or similar share compensation arrangements in place prior to the date of this Agreement (provided that in the case of new grants, the exercise price of such stock options or compensation arrangement will be no less than the Purchase Price);

 

 

- 34 -

 

(iii) the grant of restricted share units;
     
(iv) the issuance of Common Shares upon the exercise of convertible securities, warrants, stock options, or any other commitment or agreement outstanding prior to the date hereof; and

 

(r) to cause all executive officers and directors to agree not to sell, transfer, assign, pledge or otherwise dispose of any Common Shares or other securities of the Corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by such executive officers or directors, in whole or in part, or enter into any agreement or arrangement under which the economic consequences of the ownership of the securities of the Corporation is transferred, for a period commencing on March 26, 2020 and ending on the date which is 90 days after the Closing Date, subject to certain exceptions to be set out in such lock up agreement, without prior written consent of the Lead Underwriter, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

 

4.2 The Corporation will immediately inform the Underwriters at first orally, and then in writing, during the period prior to the completion of the Offering of the full particulars of:

 

(a) any material change (whether actual, anticipated, threatened, contemplated or proposed) in respect of the Corporation;
     
(b) any material fact (whether actual, anticipated, threatened, contemplated or proposed) that would have been required to have been stated in any of the Offering Documents had that fact arisen or been discovered on, or prior to, the date of the Offering Documents, as the case may be; and
     
(c) any change (whether actual, anticipated, threatened, contemplated or proposed by, to or against) in any material fact or any misstatement of any material fact contained in any of the Offering Documents, or the coming into existence of any new material fact,
     
  in all cases which change or new material fact is, or could reasonably be expected to be, of such a nature as:
     
(d) to render any of the Offering Documents, as they exist taken together in their entirety immediately prior to such change or new material fact, misleading or untrue in any material respect or could result in any of such documents, as they exist taken together in their entirety immediately prior to such change or material fact, containing a misrepresentation;
     
(e) could result in any of the Offering Documents, as they exist taken together in their entirety immediately prior to such change or material fact, not complying with any Applicable Securities Laws; or
     
(f) to constitute a Material Adverse Effect as it relates to the Corporation.

 

In addition to the provisions of Section 4.2, the Corporation will, in good faith, discuss with the Underwriters, any change, event, development or fact, contemplated, anticipated, threatened or proposed, in Section 4.2 that is of such a nature that there may be reasonable doubt as to whether written notice should be given to the Underwriters under Section 4.2 of this Agreement and will consult with the Underwriters with respect to the form and substance of any Supplementary Material proposed to be filed or delivered by the Corporation, it being understood and agreed that no such Supplementary Material will be filed by the Corporation with any Commission or delivered to any purchaser or prospective purchaser until the Underwriters and their legal counsel (i) have been given a reasonable opportunity to review, and (ii) approve such material, acting reasonably.

 

 

- 35 -

 

4.3 Each Underwriter severally covenants and agrees with the Corporation that it shall:
   
(a) fulfil and cause any other selling group members to fulfil all legal requirements (including, without limitation, compliance with Applicable Securities Laws) to be fulfilled by it in connection with the Offering in the Qualifying Jurisdictions and other jurisdictions where Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares are distributed (and the Underwriters will provide, upon reasonable request, all available documentation evidencing compliance with such legal requirements of such other jurisdictions) upon the terms of the Underwriting Agreement, and ensure that no prospectus, registration statement or offering memorandum is required to be filed and/or delivered by the Corporation in any other jurisdictions;
     
(b) promptly notify the Corporation when the Underwriter has ceased distribution of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares and shall promptly provide a written breakdown of the number of Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares distributed in each of the Qualifying Jurisdictions;
     
(c) upon being satisfied, acting reasonably, that the Prospectus Supplement and any amendments thereto is in a form satisfactory for filing with the Commissions, execute each of the Prospectus Supplement and any amendments thereto, as the case may be, presented to the Underwriter for execution, and the Underwriter will use its reasonable best efforts to assist the Corporation in obtaining the requisite approvals of the Regulatory Authorities in connection with the preparation and filing of such documents;
     
(d) the Underwriters will comply with the obligations set out in Schedule "A" to this Agreement; and
     
(e) execute all such other documents and materials as may reasonably be required and as are customary in a transaction of this nature.
     

 

5. UNDERWRITERS' FEES AND EXPENSES

 

5.1 In consideration of the services to be rendered by the Underwriters to the Corporation under this Agreement, the Corporation agrees to pay to the Underwriters, at the time and in the manner specified in this Agreement, the Underwriters' Fee.
   
5.2 The Corporation will pay, whether or not the Offering is completed, all of its costs and the reasonable costs of the Underwriters (the "Underwriters' Expenses") in connection with such Offering, including the reasonable fees and disbursements of its counsel and of counsel to the Underwriters (which fees shall not exceed $135,000 exclusive of disbursements and taxes in respect of Canadian counsel to the Underwriters) plus all applicable taxes, fees of outside consultants (if any, subject to the Corporation and the Lead Underwriter agreeing on the use of such consultants in advance), filing fees, TSX listing fees, the costs and expenses of any securities or other filings required to be made in connection with the Offering, printing costs, the preparation and holding of information meetings, the out-of-pocket expenses including all of the Underwriters' travel expenses in connection with due diligence and marketing meetings. At the option of the Underwriters, such fees and expenses may be deducted from the gross proceeds otherwise payable to the Corporation at Closing.

 

 

- 36 -

 

6. THE UNDERWRITERS

 

6.1 The subscription by the Underwriters for the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares shall be as to the following percentages:

 

Stifel Nicolaus Canada Inc. 60.0 %
Desjardins Securities Inc. 20.0 %
Paradigm Capital Inc. 14.0 %
Cormark Securities Inc. 6.0 %

 

6.2 The rights and obligations of the Underwriters under this Agreement, including but not limited to the right and obligation to subscribe for the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares and the entitlement to the Underwriters' Fee, will be several (as distinguished from joint) rights and obligations for each Underwriter. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement, the rights and obligations of the Underwriters will be divided in the proportions in which the Underwriters participate in the Offering. If an Underwriter (a "Refusing Underwriter") fails to subscribe for its applicable percentage of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares (the "Defaulted Securities") which that Underwriter has agreed to subscribe for under this Agreement, the remaining Underwriters (the "Continuing Underwriters") shall have the right, but shall not be obligated, to subscribe for all but not less than all, of the Defaulted Securities pro rata according to the number of Purchased Shares or Additional Shares to have been acquired by the Continuing Underwriters under this Agreement or in the proportion agreed upon, in writing, by the Continuing Underwriters. If no such arrangement has been made and the number of Defaulted Securities to be subscribed for by the Refusing Underwriter does not exceed 15% of the aggregate number of Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, the Continuing Underwriters will be obligated to subscribe for the Defaulted Securities on the terms set out in this Agreement in proportion to their obligations under this Agreement. In all other cases, if the Continuing Underwriters do not elect to subscribe for the Defaulted Securities the Corporation shall be entitled to terminate its obligation under this Agreement in which event there shall be no further liability on the part of the Corporation or the Continuing Underwriters except under Section 9.
   
6.3 The Corporation shall be entitled to and shall act on any notice, waiver, extension or other communication given by or on behalf of the Underwriters by the Lead Underwriter and, except to the extent that an Underwriter notifies the Corporation in writing to the contrary, the Underwriters agree that the Lead Underwriter has the authority to bind the Underwriters with respect of all matters covered by this Agreement insofar as such matters relate to the Underwriters, except that the Lead Underwriter shall not have the authority to bind the Underwriters with respect to obligations arising from Sections 6 and 9 hereof, and the Lead Underwriter shall consult with the Underwriters regarding any circumstance or matter which is of such a nature that it would reasonably require consideration by the Underwriters.

 

 

- 37 -

 

7. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

 

7.1 The following are conditions to the obligations of the Underwriters to complete the transactions contemplated in this Agreement, which conditions may be waived in writing in whole or in part by the Underwriters in their sole discretion:
   
(a) all actions required to be taken by or on behalf of the Corporation, including, without limitation, the passing of all requisite resolutions of directors of the Corporation approving the transaction contemplated hereunder, will have been taken so as to approve the Prospectuses and the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum, to obtain the conditional approval of the TSX to the Offering and to validly offer, sell and distribute the Purchased Shares, grant the Over-Allotment Option and sell and distribute the Additional Shares;
     
(b) there shall be no requirement under applicable law and no requirement imposed on the Corporation by the Regulatory Authorities to obtain, nor shall the Corporation voluntarily seek, shareholder approval of the Offering or of the issuance of the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares;
     
(c) the Corporation will have made all necessary filings with and obtained all necessary approvals, consents and acceptances of the Regulatory Authorities for the Offering and the Prospectuses to permit the Corporation to complete its obligations hereunder;
     
(d) the Corporation will have, within the required time set out hereunder, delivered or caused to be delivered the required Comfort Letter, Legal Opinions, Camino Rojo Project Title Opinions, Officers' Certificate, U.S. legal opinions, Bring-Down Letter and any other Closing Materials as the Underwriters may reasonably request no less than 48 hours prior to the Closing Time in form and substance satisfactory to the Underwriters and their counsel, acting reasonably, provided that, in the event the Camino Rojo Project Title Opinion is not available or the content is not acceptable to the Underwriters as a result of any government closure in light of COVID-19, the Camino Rojo Project Title Opinion shall not be a condition to the obligations of the Underwriters to complete the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
     
(e) no order ceasing or suspending trading in any securities of the Corporation, or ceasing or suspending trading by the directors, executive officers or promoters of the Corporation, or any one of them, or prohibiting the trade or distribution of any of the securities referred to herein will have been issued and no proceedings for such purpose, to the knowledge of the Corporation, will be pending or threatened;
     
(f) as of the Closing Time, there shall be no reports or information that in accordance with the requirements of Regulatory Authorities, must be made publicly available by the Corporation as at the Closing Time in connection with the issue of the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares that have not been made publicly available by the Corporation as required, no contracts, documents or other materials required to be filed with Regulatory Authorities by the Corporation in connection with the Prospectuses that have not been filed by the Corporation as required and delivered to the Underwriters, and no contracts, documents or other materials required to be described or referred to in the Prospectuses or the U.S. Memorandum that are not described or referred to as required and delivered to the Underwriters;

 

 

- 38 -

 

(g) the Underwriters shall have received at the Closing Time a letter from the Transfer Agent of the Corporation dated the Closing Date and signed by an authorized officer of such transfer agent confirming the issued and outstanding capital of the Corporation;
     
(h) the Underwriters not having exercised any rights of termination set forth in this Agreement;
     
(i) there shall not have occurred prior to the Closing Time, any adverse material change (actual, anticipated, contemplated or, to the knowledge of the Corporation, threatened, whether financial or otherwise) in the business, affairs, operations, assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise), financial position or capital of the Corporation on a consolidated basis;
     
(j) the Corporation will have, as of the Closing Time, complied with all of its material covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, including, without limitation, all requirements for approval of the Offering and the listing and posting for trading of the Purchased Shares and the Additional Shares on the TSX as required to be provided prior to the Closing Time; and
     
(k) the representations and warranties of the Corporation contained in this Agreement will be materially true and correct as of the Closing Time as if such representations and warranties had been made as of the Closing Time.

 

8. CLOSING

 

8.1 The Corporation and the Underwriters shall cause the Closing to occur on or about April 3, 2020 or such other date as may be mutually agreed in writing by the Corporation and the Underwriters.
     
8.2 The Closing shall be completed at the offices of Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, counsel to the Corporation, at the Closing Time on the Closing Date, or as may be agreed to by the Corporation and the Underwriters.
     
8.3 If the Underwriters have satisfied all of their obligations under this Agreement, on the Closing, the Corporation shall provide evidence of issuance of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares to the Underwriters in electronic form using the non-certificated inventory system of CDS Clearing and Depository Services Inc. ("CDS"), provided, however, that with respect to the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares sold in the United States to (or to U.S. Persons) that (i) are Qualified Institutional Buyers, the Corporation shall use the non-certificated inventory system of CDS, to be held by CDS as a non-certificated security in accordance with the rules and procedures of CDS and in the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum and exhibits thereto, and (ii) are U.S. Accredited Investors, the Corporation shall deliver definitive certificates to such holders with applicable restrictive legends attached and as set forth in the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum, and exhibits thereto.
     
8.4 If the Corporation has satisfied all of its obligations under this Agreement, on the Closing, the Underwriters shall pay to the Corporation the gross proceeds of the issue of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares at the Purchase Price, less the Underwriters' Fee and Underwriters' Expenses.

 

 

- 39 -

 

9. INDEMNITY AND CONTRIBUTION

 

9.1 The Corporation agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Underwriters, their affiliates and their respective directors, officers, employees, affiliates, shareholders, agents and partners and each Person, if any, who controls any Underwriter or its affiliates (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties" and individually, an "Indemnified Party") from and against any and all losses, claims, actions, suits, proceedings, damages, liabilities or expenses of whatsoever nature or kind (excluding loss of profits), including the aggregate amount paid in reasonable settlement of any actions, suits, proceedings, investigations or claims and the reasonable fees, disbursements and taxes of their counsel in connection with any action, suit, proceeding, investigation or claim that may be made or threatened against any Indemnified Party by a third party or in enforcing this indemnity (each a "Claim" and, collectively, the "Claims") to which an Indemnified Party may become subject or otherwise involved in any capacity insofar as the Claims relate to, are caused by, result from, arise out of or are based upon, directly or indirectly, the engagement of the Underwriters pursuant to this Agreement whether performed before or after the Corporation's execution of the Agreement and to reimburse each Indemnified Party forthwith, upon demand, for any legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by such Indemnified Party in connection with any Claim, unless a Claim was caused by or resulted from an Indemnified Party's breach of the Agreement, negligence, fraudulent act or illegal act or wilful misconduct, in which case this indemnity shall cease to apply to such Indemnified Party in respect of such Claim and such Indemnified Party shall reimburse any funds advanced by the Corporation to the Indemnified Party pursuant to this indemnity in respect of such Claim. The Corporation agrees to waive any right the Corporation might have of first requiring the Indemnified Party to proceed against or enforce any other right, power, remedy or security or claim payment from any other person before claiming under this indemnity. The indemnity provided for in this section shall not apply to an Indemnified Party if and to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction in a final judgement that has become non-appealable shall determine that such Indemnified Party has been negligent or has committed any fraudulent act, wilful misconduct or illegal act or breach of agreement in the course of its performance under this Agreement.
   
9.2 If any Claim is brought against an Indemnified Party or an Indemnified Party has received notice of the commencement of any investigation in respect of which indemnity may be sought against the Corporation, the Indemnified Party will give the Corporation prompt written notice of any such Claim of which the Indemnified Party has knowledge and the Corporation will undertake the investigation and defence thereof on behalf of the Indemnified Party, including the prompt employment of counsel acceptable to the Indemnified Parties affected and the payment of all expenses. Failure by the Indemnified Party to so notify shall not relieve the Corporation of its obligation of indemnification hereunder unless (and only to the extent that) such failure results in forfeiture by the Corporation of substantive rights or defences.
   
9.3 No admission of liability and no settlement, compromise or termination of any Claim, or investigation shall be made without the Corporation's consent and the consent of the Indemnified Parties affected, such consents not to be unreasonably withheld. Notwithstanding that the Corporation will undertake the investigation and defence of any Claim, an Indemnified Party will have the right to employ separate counsel with respect to such Claim and participate in the defence thereof if:
   
(a) employment of such counsel has been authorized in writing by the Corporation;
     
(b) the Corporation has not assumed the defence of the action within a reasonable period of time after receiving notice of the Claim;
     
(c) the named parties to any such claim include both the Corporation and the Indemnified Party and the Indemnified Party shall have been advised by counsel in writing to the Indemnified Party that there may be a conflict of interest between the Corporation and the Indemnified Party; or
     
(d) there are one or more defences available to the Indemnified Party which are different from or in addition to those available to the Corporation;

 

in which case such reasonable fees and expenses of such counsel to the Indemnified Party will be for the Corporation's account; provided that the Corporation shall not be responsible for more than one counsel for all Indemnified Parties The rights accorded to the Indemnified Parties hereunder shall be in addition to any rights an Indemnified Party may have at common law or otherwise.

 

 

- 40 -

 

9.4 If for any reason the foregoing indemnification is unavailable (other than in accordance with the terms hereof) to the Indemnified Parties (or any of them) or insufficient to hold them harmless, the Corporation will contribute to the amount paid or payable by the Indemnified Parties as a result of such Claims in such proportion as is appropriate to reflect not only the relative benefits received by the Corporation or the Corporation's shareholders on the one hand and the Indemnified Parties on the other, but also the relative fault of the parties and other equitable considerations which may be relevant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation will in any event contribute to the amount paid or payable by the Indemnified Parties as a result of such Claim any amount in excess of the fees actually received by the Indemnified Parties hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a party guilty of fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, or negligence shall not be entitled to contribution from the other party. Each Underwriter will only be responsible for that portion represented by the percentage that the portion of the Underwriters' Fee payable by the Corporation to Underwriters has to the gross proceeds realized from the sale of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, and the Corporation will be responsible for the balance, provided that in no event, will the Underwriters be responsible for any amount in excess of the amount of the Underwriters' Fees actually received by them. The right to contribution provided herein shall be in addition and not in derogation of any other right to contribution which the Underwriters may have by statute or otherwise by law.
   
9.5 The Corporation hereby constitutes the Lead Underwriter as trustee for each of their respective other Indemnified Parties of the Corporation's covenants under this indemnity with respect to such persons and the Lead Underwriter agrees to accept such trust and to hold and enforce such covenants on behalf of such persons.

 

10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT

 

10.1 In addition to any other remedies which may be available to the Underwriters, each of the Underwriters shall have the right to terminate its obligations under this Agreement, including its obligation to purchase Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, upon delivery of written notice to the Corporation at any time up to the Closing of the Offering in any of the following events:
   
(a) there is a material change or a change in any material fact or a new material fact shall arise, or there should be discovered any previously undisclosed material fact which would reasonably be expected to have a significant adverse effect on the business, affairs or financial condition of the Corporation, the Corporation Subsidiaries or their material properties or on the market price or value of the securities of the Corporation;

 

 

- 41 -

 

(b) (i) any inquiry, action, suit, proceeding or investigation (whether formal or informal) (including matters of regulatory transgression or unlawful conduct) is commenced, announced or threatened in relation to the Corporation or any one of the officers or directors of the Corporation where wrong-doing is alleged or any order made by any federal, provincial, state, municipal or other governmental department, Commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality including, without limitation, the TSX or any securities regulatory authority which involves a finding of wrong doing (except for any inquiry, action, suit, proceeding, investigation or order based upon activities of the Underwriters and not upon activities of the Corporation) which in the reasonable opinion of the Underwriters (or any of them) seriously adversely affects, or involves, or will seriously adversely affect, or involve, the business, operations or affairs of the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries taken as a whole; or (ii) any order, action, proceeding, law or regulation is made, enacted or changed which ceases trading in the Corporation's securities or, in the opinion of the Underwriters (or any of them), acting reasonably, operates to prevent or restrict the trading of the Common Shares; or (iii) if there should develop, occur or come into effect or existence any event, action, state, condition or major financial occurrence of national or international consequence (including without limitation terrorism or accident) or any new or any change in law or regulation which in the reasonable opinion of the Underwriters (or any of them) seriously adversely affects, or involves, or will seriously adversely affect, or involve, the financial markets or the business, operations or affairs of the Corporation and the Corporation Subsidiaries taken as a whole;
     
(c) the Corporation is in breach of a material term, condition or covenant of this Agreement that cannot be cured prior to the Closing Date, or any representation or warranty given by the Corporation in this Agreement becomes false (and cannot be cured prior to the Closing Date); or
     
(d) both the Lead Underwriter and the Corporation agree in writing to terminate this Agreement.

 

For greater certainty, the COVID-19 Outbreak and any related interruption to the business, affairs or financial condition of the Corporation, or any event, action, state or condition or financial occurrence related directly or indirectly to the COVID-19 Outbreak (whether now known or unknown or whether foreseeable or unforeseeable in the future), including any adverse effect on the financial markets generally, shall not constitute an event or occurrence which will enable any Underwriter to rely on Section 10.1(a), (b) or (c). The right of the Underwriters to terminate this Agreement is in addition to such other remedies any of the purchasers may have in respect of any default, misrepresentation, act or failure to act of the Corporation in respect of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

 

10.2 Any such termination shall be effected by notice in writing to the Corporation at any time prior to the Closing Time.
   
10.3 The Corporation shall pay the Underwriters' Expenses in the event of termination as set out in this Agreement.

 

 

- 42 -

 

11. OVER-ALLOTMENT OPTION

 

11.1 The Corporation hereby grants to the Underwriters, in the respective percentages set out in Section 6 of this Agreement, the Over-Allotment Option to purchase the Additional Shares at the Purchase Price.
     
11.2 The Over-Allotment Option may be exercised in whole or in part at any time and from time to time prior to its expiry in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement by the Lead Underwriter, on behalf of the Underwriters, by delivering to the Corporation written notice of exercise, setting out the number of Additional Shares to be purchased by the Underwriters, which notice must be received by the Corporation not later than 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on the date that is thirty (30) days after the Closing Date. Upon furnishing of the notice, the Underwriters will severally (and not jointly nor jointly and severally) be committed to purchase the Additional Shares in the respective percentages set out in Section 6 of this Agreement and the Corporation will be committed to issue and sell in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this Agreement, the number of Additional Shares indicated in the notice. Additional Shares may be purchased by the Underwriters only for the purpose of satisfying over-allotments made in connection with the distribution of the Purchased Shares and for market stabilization purposes permitted pursuant to Applicable Securities Laws.
     
11.3 In the event that the Over-Allotment Option is exercised by the Underwriters and any of the Additional Shares are purchased by the Underwriters, the closing shall take place at the offices mentioned in Section 8 above, or at such other place as shall be agreed upon by the Underwriters and the Corporation, on each Over-Allotment Closing Date.
     
11.4 At the Closing Time on an Over-Allotment Closing Date, if any, for the exercise of the Over-Allotment Option, subject to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, the Corporation shall deliver to the Underwriters a certificate or certificates representing Additional Shares against payment of the aggregate Purchase Price by wire transfer on such Over-Allotment Closing Date payable to the Corporation or, if requested, utilize the NCI System. The Corporation will, at the Closing Time on such Over-Allotment Closing Date, and upon such payment of the aggregate Purchase Price for the Additional Shares to the Corporation, make payment in full of the Underwriters' Fee and the Underwriters' Expenses relating to the Additional Shares purchased, which shall be made by the Corporation directing the Underwriters to withhold the Underwriters' Fee and the Underwriters' Expenses relating to the Additional Shares purchased from the payment of the aggregate Purchase Price for the Additional Shares. Certificates representing the Additional Shares shall be registered in such names as the Underwriters may request provided such request is made two (2) Business Days prior to an Over-Allotment Closing Date.
     
11.5 The closing of the Over-Allotment Option shall be conditional upon the conditions of closing set forth in Section 7 being satisfied at the Closing Time on the Over-Allotment Closing Date.
     
11.6 In the event that the Corporation shall subdivide, consolidate, reclassify or otherwise change its Common Shares during the period in which the Over-Allotment Option is exercisable, appropriate adjustments will be made to the Purchase Price and to the number of Additional Shares issuable on exercise thereof such that the Underwriters are entitled to arrange for the sale of the same number and type of securities that the Underwriters would have otherwise arranged for had they exercised such Over-Allotment Option immediately prior to such subdivision, consolidation, reclassification or change.

 

 

- 43 -

 

12. GENERAL

 

12.1 Any notice to be given hereunder shall be in writing and may be given by fax, e-mail, courier or by hand delivery and shall, in the case of notice to the Corporation, be addressed, delivered or transmitted to:
   
(a) in the case of the Corporation:
     

Orla Mining Ltd.

595 Howe Street, Suite 202

Vancouver, BC V6E 2T5

 

Attention: Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer

E-mail: jason.simpson@orlamining.com

 

with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):

 

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

885 West Georgia Street, Suite 2200

Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8

 

Attention: Jen Hansen, Partner

E-mail: jhansen@cassels.com

 

with an additional copy to (which shall not constitute notice):

 

Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP

2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700

Chicago, IL 60202

 

Attention: John Koenigsknecht, Partner

E-mail: jkoenigsknecht@nge.com

 

(b) in the case of the Underwriters:

 

Stifel Nicolaus Canada Inc.

145 King Street West, Suite 300

Toronto, ON M5H 1J8

 

Attention: Pierre Laliberte, Director, Investment Banking

E-mail: plaliberte@stifel.com

 

and

 

Desjardins Securities Inc.

25 York Street, Suite 1000

Toronto, ON M5J 2V5

 

Attention: Bruno Kaiser, Managing Director, Head of Metals & Mining, Investment Banking

E-mail: bruno.kaiser@desjardins.com

 

 

- 44 -

 

and

 

Paradigm Capital Inc.

95 Wellington Street West, Suite 2101

Toronto, ON M5J 2N7

 

Attention: John Booth, Partner, Head of Investment Banking

E-mail: john.booth@paradigmcap.com

 

and

 

Cormark Securities Inc.

Royal Bank Plaza, North Tower

200 Bay Street, Suite 1800

Toronto, ON M5J 2J2

 

Attention: Kevin Carter, Managing Director, Investment Banking

E-mail: kcarter@cormark.com

 

with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):

 

Bennett Jones LLP

3400 One First Canadian Place

100 King Street West

Toronto, ON M5X 1A4

 

Attention: Norman Findlay, Partner

E-mail: findlayn@bennettjones.com

 

The Corporation and the Underwriters may change their respective addresses for notice by notice given in the manner referred to above.

 

12.2 Time and each of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be of the essence of this Agreement and any waiver by the parties of this Section 12.2 or any failure by them to exercise any of their rights under this Agreement shall be limited to the particular instance and shall not extend to any other instance or matter in this Agreement or otherwise affect any of their rights or remedies under this Agreement.
     
12.3 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto in respect of the matters referred to herein and there are no representations, warranties, covenants or agreements, expressed or implied, collateral hereto other than as expressly set forth or referred to herein and this Agreement supersedes any previous agreements, arrangements or understandings among the parties including, without limitation, the engagement letter between the Corporation and the Lead Underwriter dated March 26, 2020.
     
12.4 The headings in this Agreement are for reference only and do not constitute terms of the Agreement.

 

 

- 45 -

 

12.5 The provisions contained in this Agreement which, by their terms, require performance by a party to this Agreement subsequent to the Closing Date of this Agreement, shall survive the Closing Date of this Agreement.
   
12.6 No alteration, amendment, modification or interpretation of this Agreement or any provision of this Agreement shall be valid and binding upon the parties hereto unless such alteration, amendment, modification or interpretation is in written form executed by the parties directly affected by such alteration, amendment, modification or interpretation.
   
12.7 The parties hereto shall execute and deliver all such further documents and instruments and do all such acts and things as any party may, either before or after the Closing Date, reasonably require in order to carry out the full intent and meaning of this Agreement.
   
12.8 This Agreement may not be assigned by any party hereto without the prior written consent of all of the parties hereto.
   
12.9 This Agreement shall be subject to, governed by, and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein.
   
12.10 The invalidity or unenforceability of any particular provision of this Agreement shall not affect or limit the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.
   
12.11 The Corporation hereby acknowledges that the Underwriters are acting solely as underwriters in connection with the subscription for and issue of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares. The Corporation further acknowledges that the Underwriters are acting pursuant to a contractual relationship created solely by this Agreement entered into on an arm's length basis, and in no event do the parties intend that the Underwriters act or be responsible as a fiduciary to the Corporation, its management, shareholders or creditors or any other person in connection with any activity that the Underwriters may undertake or have undertaken in furtherance of such subscription for and issue of the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, either before or after the date hereof. The Underwriters hereby expressly disclaim any fiduciary or similar obligations to the Corporation, either in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any matters leading up to such transactions, and the Corporation hereby confirms its understanding and agreement to that effect. The Corporation and the Underwriters agree that they are each responsible for making their own independent judgments with respect to any such transactions and that any opinions or views expressed by the Underwriters to the Corporation regarding such transactions, including, but not limited to, any opinions or views with respect to the price or market for the Purchased Shares and any Additional Shares, do not constitute advice or recommendations to the Corporation. The Corporation and the Underwriters agree that the Underwriters are acting as principal and not the agent or fiduciary of the Corporation and no Underwriter has assumed, and no Underwriter will assume, any advisory responsibility in favour of the Corporation with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby or the process leading thereto (irrespective of whether any Underwriter has advised or is currently advising the Corporation on other matters). The Corporation hereby waives and releases, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any claims that the Corporation may have against the Underwriters with respect to any breach or alleged breach of any fiduciary, advisory or similar duty to the Corporation in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any matters leading up to such transactions.

 

12.12 This Agreement may be signed by the parties in as many counterparts as may be deemed necessary (including counterparts by facsimile or other means of electronic transmission), each of which so signed shall be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
   

 

[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 

 

 

 

If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding and agreed to by you, please signify your acceptance on the accompanying counterparts of this letter and return same to the Underwriters whereupon this letter as so accepted shall constitute an agreement between the Corporation and the Underwriters enforceable in accordance with its terms.

 

  STIFEL NICOLAUS CANADA INC.
   
  Per: (signed) "Pierre Laliberte"
    Name: Pierre Laliberte
    Title: Director, Investment Banking

 

  DESJARDINS SECURITIES INC.
   
  Per: (signed) "Bruno Kaiser"
    Name: Bruno Kaiser
    Title: Managing Director, Investment Banking

 

  PARADIGM CAPITAL INC.
   
  Per: (signed) "John Booth"
    Name: John Booth
    Title: Head of Investment Banking

 

  CORMARK SECURITIES INC.
   
  Per: (signed) "Kevin Carter"
    Name: Kevin Carter
    Title: Managing Director, Investment Banking

 

The foregoing is accepted and agreed to on the 30th day of March 2020, effective as of the date appearing on the first page of this Agreement.

 

  ORLA MINING LTD.
   

  Per: (signed) "Jason Simpson"
    Name: Jason Simpson
    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

SCHEDULE "A"

 

UNITED STATES OFFERS AND SALES

 

As used in this and related appendices, capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Underwriting Agreement to which this Schedule "A" is annexed and to which it forms a part, and the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:

 

(a) "Directed Selling Efforts" means directed selling efforts as that term is defined in Regulation S. Without limiting the foregoing, but for greater clarity in this Schedule "A", it means, subject to the exclusions from the definition of directed selling efforts contained in Regulation S, any activity undertaken for the purpose of, or that could reasonably be expected to have the effect of, conditioning the market in the United States for any of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares and includes the placement of an advertisement in a publication with a general circulation in the United States that refers to the Offering of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares;

 

(b) "Disqualification Event" means any of the "Bad Actor" disqualifications described in Rule 506(d)(1)(i) to (viii) of Regulation D;

 

(c) "Foreign Issuer" shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in Regulation S. Without limiting the foregoing, but for greater clarity in this Schedule "A", it includes any issuer which is a corporation or other organization incorporated or organized under the laws of any country other than the United States, except an issuer meeting the following conditions as of the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter: (1) more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer are owned of record either directly or indirectly by residents of the United States; and (2) any of the following: (i) the majority of the executive officers or directors are United States citizens or residents, (ii) more than 50 percent of the assets of the issuer are located in the United States, or (iii) the business of the issuer is administered principally in the United States;

 

(d) "General Solicitation" and "General Advertising" mean "general solicitation" and "general advertising", respectively, as used in Rule 502(c) under the U.S. Securities Act, including, without limitation, advertisements, articles, notices or other communications published in any newspaper, magazine or similar media or the Internet, or broadcast over radio, or television or the internet or any seminar or meeting whose attendees had been invited by general solicitation or general advertising or in any other manner involving a public offering within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the U.S. Securities Act;

 

(e) "Qualified Institutional Buyer" means a "qualified institutional buyer" as defined in Rule 144A;

 

(f) "Regulation D" means Regulation D adopted by the SEC under the U. S. Securities Act;

 

(g) "Regulation S" means Regulation S adopted by the SEC under the U.S. Securities Act;

 

(h) "Rule 144A" means Rule 144A under the U.S. Securities Act;

 

(i) "SEC" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission;

 

 

- A-2 -

 

(j) "Substantial U.S. Market Interest" means "substantial U.S. market interest" as that term is defined in Regulation S;

 

(k) "U.S. Accredited Investors" means "accredited investors" as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D;

 

(l) "U.S. Exchange Act" means the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(m) "U.S. Securities Act" means the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Underwriters

 

Each of the Underwriters and its U.S. Affiliates, as applicable, acknowledges that the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares, in each case as used herein (and not noted separately), as applicable, have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act and may be offered and sold only in transactions exempt from, or not subject to, the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. Accordingly, each of the Underwriters and the U.S. Affiliates represents, warrants and covenants to the Corporation that:

 

1. It has not offered or sold, and will not offer or sell, any Purchased Shares or Additional Shares except (a) in accordance with Rule 903 of Regulation S or (b) in the United States (or to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person) (i) to Qualified Institutional Buyers pursuant to Rule 144A or (ii) to a limited number of U.S. Accredited Investors pursuant to Regulation D. Accordingly, (a) except with respect to offers and sales to Qualified Institutional Buyers in reliance upon Rule 144A or (b) except to a limited number of U.S. Accredited Investors, neither the Underwriter nor its U.S. Affiliate nor any persons acting on its or their behalf has engaged or will engage in (i) any offer to sell or any solicitation of an offer to buy, any Purchased Shares or Additional Shares to any person in the United States (or to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person), or (ii) any sale of Purchased Shares or Additional Shares to any purchaser unless, at the time the buy order was or will have been originated, the purchaser was outside the United States (and not to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person), or such Underwriter, affiliate or person acting on behalf of either reasonably believed that such purchaser was outside the United States (and not to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person). It has not engaged in (i) any Directed Selling Efforts with respect to the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares, or (ii) any action in violation of Regulation M under the U.S. Exchange Act in connection with the offer and sale of the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares.

 

2. All offers and sales of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares in the United States, or to or for the benefit of a U.S. Person, will be effected by or through the U.S. Affiliate of the Underwriter, duly registered under the 1934 Act and applicable state securities laws in each state in which such offer or sale is made and as members in good standing with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., and will be effected in accordance with all applicable U.S. federal and state broker-dealer requirements. Each such U.S. Affiliate of the Underwriter in the United States is a Qualified Institutional Buyer.

 

3. It has not entered and will not enter into any contractual arrangement with respect to the distribution of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares, except with its affiliates, any selling group members or with the prior written consent of the Corporation. The Underwriters, as applicable, shall each require its U.S. Affiliate and each selling group member through which it effects offers and sales to agree, for the benefit of the Corporation, to comply with, and shall use its best efforts to ensure that each U.S. Affiliate and selling group member complies with, the provisions of this Schedule "A" applicable to such Underwriter as if such provisions applied to such U.S. Affiliate and selling group member.

 

 

- A-3 -

 

4. Offers and sales of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares in the United States by the Underwriters or their U.S. Affiliates have not been and will not be made (i) by any form of General Solicitation or General Advertising, or (ii) in any manner involving a public offering within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the U.S. Securities Act.

 

5. Any offer or sale of, or solicitation of an offer to buy, the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares that has been made or will be made in the United States (or to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person) was or will be made only to Qualified Institutional Buyers in accordance with Rule 144A or to a limited number of U.S. Accredited Investors in accordance with Regulation D in transactions that are exempt from registration under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws.

 

6. Each offeree in the United States (or to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person) has been or shall be provided with a copy of the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum and any exhibits or attachments thereto in connection with such offer. Prior to any sale of the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares to a person in the United States (or to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person) or to a person who was offered the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares in the United States, each such purchaser shall be provided with a copy of the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum (and exhibits thereto), including the Prospectus Supplement and Final Base Shelf Prospectus, and no written material other than the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum (and exhibits thereto) was used in connection with the offer and sale of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares in the United States.

 

7. Each Qualified Institutional Buyer solicited by the Underwriters or its U.S. Affiliate will be informed that the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares are "restricted securities" as defined in Rule 144(a)(3) under the U.S. Securities Act that will not be represented by certificates that bear a U.S. restricted legend or identified by a restricted CUSIP number, are subject to restrictions if in the future it decides to offer, sell, pledge, or otherwise transfer, directly or indirectly, any of such Purchased Shares or Additional Shares as set forth in the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum (and Exhibit I thereto), and that it must implement appropriate internal controls and procedures to ensure that such Purchased Shares or Additional Shares shall be properly identified in its records as restricted securities that are subject to the transfer restrictions set forth therein notwithstanding the absence of a U.S. restricted legend or restricted CUSIP number.

 

8. It has offered and will offer the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares in the United States only to offerees with respect to which it has reasonable grounds to believe was at the time of such offer and will be on the Closing Date or any Over-Allotment Closing Date, a Qualified Institutional Buyer.

 

9. All U.S. Accredited Investors of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares that are in the United States (or to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person) shall be informed that the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act and are being offered and sold to such purchasers in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and pursuant to the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum (and Exhibit II thereto), and shall be in certificated form and have applicable restrictive legends.

 

10. Prior to the completion of any sale of the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares (i) to a Qualified Institutional Buyer, each such Qualified Institutional Buyer will be required to properly complete, execute and deliver a Qualified Institutional Buyer's Letter in the form attached to the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum as Exhibit I; or (ii) to a U.S. Accredited Investor, each such U.S. Accredited Investor will be required to complete, execute, and deliver a U.S. Purchaser's Letter in the form attached to the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum as Exhibit II.

 

 

- A-4 -

 

11. At least two business days prior to any Closing Date and/or Over-Allotment Closing Date, as applicable, the Corporation will be provided prior to any such Closing or Over-Allotment Closing with a list of all offerees and purchasers of the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares, as applicable, in the United States (or to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person) and copies of all executed Qualified Institutional Buyer Letters and U.S. Purchaser Letters, as applicable.

 

12. As of the Closing Date, each of the Underwriters and U.S. Affiliates represents that none of (i) the Underwriter or its U.S. Affiliate, (ii) the Underwriter's or its U.S. Affiliate's general partners or managing members, (iii) any of the Underwriter's or its U.S. Affiliate's directors, executive officers or other officers participating in the Offering, (iv) any of the Underwriter's or its U.S. Affiliate's general partners' or managing members' directors, executive officers or other officers participating in the Offering or (v) any other person associated with any of the above persons that has been or will be paid (directly or indirectly) remuneration for solicitation of purchasers in connection with the sale of the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares (each, a "Dealer Covered Person"), is subject to a Disqualification Event except for a Disqualification Event (i) covered by Rule 506(d)(2) of Regulation D and (ii) a description of which has been furnished in writing to the Corporation prior to the date hereof or, in the case of a Disqualification Event occurring after the date hereof, prior to the Closing Date.

 

13. At or prior to the Closing Date or Over-Allotment Closing Date, if applicable, each Underwriter together with its U.S. Affiliate that offered or sold the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares in the United States, will provide to the Corporation a certificate in the form of Exhibit I to this Schedule "A" relating to the manner of the offer and sale of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares in the United States or will be deemed to have represented and warranted, with the same force and effect, that neither it nor its U.S. Affiliate offered or sold securities in the United States.

 

Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Corporation

 

The Corporation represents, warrants, covenants and agrees that:

 

1. The Corporation is and on the Closing Date will be a Foreign Issuer with no Substantial U.S. Market Interest in its common shares and is not required to be registered as an "investment company" under the United States Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended; and neither the Corporation nor any of its predecessors or affiliates has been subject to any order, judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction temporarily, preliminarily or permanently enjoining such person for failure to comply with Rule 503 of Regulation D.

 

2. Except with respect to sales to Qualified Institutional Buyers in reliance upon Rule 144A or to a limited number of U.S. Accredited Investors, neither the Corporation nor any of its affiliates, nor any person acting on its or their behalf (other than the Underwriters, their affiliates and any person acting on their behalf, as to whom no representation is made), has made or will make: (A) any offer to sell, or any solicitation of an offer to buy, any Purchased Shares or Additional Shares to a person in the United States (or to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person); or (B) any sale of the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares unless, at the time the buy order was or will have been originated, the purchaser is (i) outside the United States (and not acting for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person), or (ii) the Corporation and any person acting on its behalf reasonably believe that the purchaser is outside the United States (and not acting for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person).

 

 

- A-5 -

 

3. Neither it nor any of its affiliates, nor any person acting on its or their behalf (other than the Underwriters, their affiliates and any person acting on their behalf, as to whom no representation is made), has made or will make any Directed Selling Efforts with respect to the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares, or has taken or will take any action that would cause the exclusion afforded by Regulation S to be unavailable for offers and sales of the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares pursuant to this Agreement.

 

4. None of the Corporation, any of its affiliates or any person acting on its or their behalf (other than the Underwriters, their affiliates and any person acting on their behalf, as to whom no representation is made) have (i) engaged or will engage in any form of General Solicitation or General Advertising with respect to offers or sales of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares in the United States, or (ii) undertaken any activity in a manner involving a public offering within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the U.S. Securities Act.

 

5. None of the Corporation, any of its affiliates or any person acting on any of their behalf (other than the Underwriters, their respective affiliates, or any person acting on any of their behalf, in respect of which no representation is made) has taken or will take, directly or indirectly, any action in violation of Regulation M under the U.S. Exchange Act in connection with the offer and sale of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares.

 

6. So long as any of the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares are outstanding and are "restricted securities" within the meaning of Rule 144(a)(3) under the U.S. Securities Act and cannot be sold pursuant to Rule 144(b)(1) under the U.S. Securities Act, the Corporation will, if it is neither subject to and in compliance with the reporting requirements of Section 13 or Subsection 15(d) of the U.S. Exchange Act nor exempt from such requirements pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) thereunder, provide to any holder of those restricted securities, or to any prospective purchaser of those restricted securities designated by a holder, upon the request of that holder or prospective purchaser, at or prior to the time of sale, the information required to be provided by Rule 144A(d)(4) under the U.S. Securities Act (so long as that requirement is necessary in order to permit holders of the restricted securities to effect resales under Rule 144A).

 

7. The Purchased Shares and Additional Shares are not, and as of the Closing Date the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares will not be, and no securities of the same class as the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares are or will be, listed on a national securities exchange in the United States registered under Section 6 of the U.S. Exchange Act or quoted in a "U.S. automated inter-dealer quotation system," as such term is used in Rule 144A.

 

8. As of the Closing Date, none of the Corporation, any of its predecessors, any "affiliated" (as such term is defined in Rule 501(b) of Regulation D) issuer, or to its knowledge, after exercising reasonable care, any director, executive officer or other officer of the Corporation participating in the offering of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares, any beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Corporation's outstanding voting equity securities, calculated on the basis of voting power, or any promoter (as that term is defined in Rule 405 under the U.S. Securities Act) connected with the Corporation in any capacity at the time of sale of the Purchased Shares or Additional Shares (other than any Dealer Covered Person (as defined herein), as to whom no representation is made) is subject to any of the "Bad Actor" disqualifications described in Rule 506(d)(1) under Regulation D (a "Disqualification Event").

 

9. The Corporation shall cooperate with the reasonable requests of the Underwriters and counsel for the Underwriters to use its reasonable efforts to satisfy exemptions from the application of any applicable "blue sky" or state securities laws of those jurisdictions designated by the Underwriters, shall comply with any such applicable state securities law requirements and shall continue to be in compliance with such state securities laws in effect so long as required for the initial offer and sale of the Purchased Shares and Additional Shares contemplated herein.

 

 

- A-6 -

 

EXHIBIT "I" TO SCHEDULE "A"

 

UNDERWRITERS' CERTIFICATE

 

In connection with the private placement in the United States of Common Shares (the "Securities") of Orla Mining Ltd. (the "Corporation") pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement dated as of March 30, 2020 among the Corporation and the underwriters named therein (the "Underwriters"), each of the undersigned does hereby certify as follows:

 

(a) each undersigned Underwriter or U.S. affiliate of the undersigned Underwriter (the "U.S. Affiliate") that offered or sold the Securities in the United States is duly registered as a broker or dealer under the U.S. Exchange Act and the securities laws of each state in which such offer or sale is made (unless exempted from the respective state's broker-dealer registration requirements) and a member of and in good standing with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. on the date hereof and on the date of each offer and sale made in the United States;

 

(b) all offers and sales of the Securities in the United States were made only through the U.S. Affiliate and have been effected in accordance with all applicable U.S. broker-dealer requirements and the terms and conditions set forth in the Underwriting Agreement (including any exhibits thereto) and the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum;

 

(c) each offeree in the United States or a U.S. Person that was a Qualified Institutional Buyer to which we offered Securities, prior to the time of such offeree's purchase of Securities, was provided with a copy of the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum (and exhibits thereto), including the Prospectuses, and we did not use any other written material in connection with the offer or sale of Securities in the United States to Qualified Institutional Buyers pursuant to Rule 144A;

 

(d) each offeree in the United States or a U.S. Person that was a U.S. Accredited Investor to which we offered Securities, prior to the time of such offeree's purchase of Securities, was provided with a copy of the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum (and exhibits thereto), including the Prospectuses, and we did not use any other written material in connection with the offer or sale of Securities in the United States (or to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person) to U.S. Accredited Investors pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D;

 

(e) immediately prior to our transmitting the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum (and any exhibits thereto) to such offerees, we had reasonable grounds to believe and did believe that each such offeree was, and continue to believe that each such offeree is, either a U.S. Accredited Investor or Qualified Institutional Buyer, as applicable, and, on the date of this certificate, we continue to believe that each such person purchasing Securities is a U.S. Accredited Investor or Qualified Institutional Buyer, as applicable;

 

(f) no form of "general solicitation" or "general advertising" (as those terms are used in Regulation D under the U.S. Securities Act) was used by us, including without limitation advertisements, articles, notices or other communications published in any newspaper, magazine or similar media or broadcast over radio or television or the internet, or any seminar or meeting whose attendees had been invited by general solicitation or general advertising, in connection with the offer or sale of the Securities in the United States;

 

 

- A-7 -

 

(g) no Directed Selling Efforts were engaged in with respect to the offer or sale of the Securities;

 

(h) prior to any sale in the United States (or to or for the account or benefit of, a U.S. Person) (i) of Securities to a Qualified Institutional Buyer we obtained an executed Qualified Institutional Buyer Letter in the form set forth as Exhibit I to the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum or (ii) of Securities to a U.S. Accredited Investor we obtained an executed U.S. Purchaser's Letter in the form set forth as Exhibit II to the U.S. Private Placement Memorandum, and a copy of each such Exhibit, as applicable, has been delivered to the Corporation; and

 

(i) none of the undersigned nor any affiliates of the undersigned has taken or will take any action that would constitute a violation of Regulation M under the U.S. Exchange Act.

 

Terms used in this certificate have the meanings given to them in the Underwriting Agreement unless otherwise defined herein. This Underwriters' Certificate may be relied upon by counsel to the Corporation as if originally issued to such counsel. A newly executed copy of this Underwriters' Certificate shall be provided in connection with any subsequent closing date, including, but not limited to, any Over-Allotment Closing Date, as applicable.

 

Dated this _____ day of _______________, 2020.

 

[UNDERWRITER]   [NAME OF U.S. AFFILIATE]
         
         
By:     By:  
 

Name:

   

Name:

  Title:     Title:

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.31

 

March 26, 2020
Orla Mining Ltd.

 

C$75,030,000 Bought Deal Financing of Common Shares

 

A final base shelf prospectus containing important information relating to the securities described in this document has been filed with the securities regulatory authorities in all the provinces and territories of Canada, except Québec. A copy of the final base shelf prospectus, any amendment to the final base shelf prospectus and any applicable shelf prospectus supplement that has been filed, is required to be delivered with this document.

 

 

This document does not provide full disclosure of all material facts relating to the securities offered. Investors should read the final base shelf prospectus, any amendment and any applicable shelf prospectus supplement for disclosure of those facts, especially risk factors relating to the securities offered, before making an investment decision.

 

 

This communication shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction.

 

 

 

 

 

Issuer: Orla Mining Ltd. (“Orla” or the “Company”).
Offering:   “Bought-deal” offering of 36,600,000 common shares (the “Common Shares”) of the Company.  
Offering Size: C$75,030,000.
Offering Price: C$2.05 per Common Share.
Over-Allotment Option: The Company will grant the Underwriters an option (the “Over-Allotment Option”) to purchase up to an additional 5,490,000 Common Shares at the Offering Price, exercisable in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time on or prior to the date that is 30 days following the closing of the Offering. The Underwriters shall be entitled to the same Commission (as hereinafter defined) provided for below in respect of any Common Shares issued and sold upon exercise of the Over Allotment Option.
Use of Proceeds: The net proceeds from the Offering will be used for exploration and development activities at Camino Rojo projects and for general corporate purposes.
Form of Offering: Bought deal by way of a prospectus supplement, subject to a formal underwriting agreement, including standard industry "regulatory proceedings out", “disaster out”, “material adverse change out” and "non-compliance out" clauses running up to the Closing Date.
Jurisdictions: The qualifying jurisdictions for this offering will be all provinces and territories of Canada, other than Quebec. The Common Shares will also be sold to U.S. buyers on a private placement basis pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements in Rule 144A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and other jurisdictions outside of Canada provided that no prospectus filing or comparable obligation arises.
1
 
 

 

 

Participation Rights: The Underwriters understand that Newmont Corporation and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited have participation rights to own a pre-determined ownership in the Company. The Underwriters agree to sell such number of Common Shares to Newmont Corporation and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited for them pursuant to their participation rights.
Standstill and LockUp: The Company will be, subject to certain exceptions, subject to a standstill with respect to the issuance of common shares or any securities convertible or exchangeable into common shares of the Company for 90 days after Closing of the Offering. The Company's directors and officers will also be, subject to certain exceptions, restricted from trading in the Company's securities from the date hereof until the date that is 90 days after Closing of the Offering.
Listing: The Company shall obtain the necessary approvals to list the Common Shares, which listing shall be conditionally approved prior to closing.   The Common Shares are currently listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “OLA”.
Eligibility: Eligible under the usual statutes and for RRSPs, RRIFs, RESPs, RDSPs, and TFSAs.
Bookrunner: Stifel GMP
Commission:   A cash commission of 5.0% (1.0% in the case of Common Shares purchased by Newmont Corporation and Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited in connection with the exercise of their participation rights, and on any orders from Pierre Lassonde and Trinity Partners) of the aggregate gross proceeds from the Offering (including the Over-Allotment Option).  
Closing Date: On or about April 3, 2020 or such other date as the Company and Underwriters may agree (the “Closing Date”).

 

 

 

 

 

 

“The information contained herein is believed to be accurate; however it is to change without notice.”

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.32

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES

 

ORLA MINING ANNOUNCES C$75,030,000 BOUGHT DEAL FINANCING

 

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, March, 26 2020 -- Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX:OLA) (the “Company” or “Orla”) announced today that it has entered into an agreement with a syndicate of underwriters led by Stifel GMP (the “Underwriters”), pursuant to which the Underwriters will purchase, on a bought deal basis, 36,600,000 common shares (the “Common Shares”) of the Company at a price of C$2.05 per Common Share (the “Offering Price”) for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of C$75,030,000 (the “Offering”).

 

Newmont Corporation and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited each have indicated that they intend to subscribe for such number of Common Shares from the Offering pursuant to their participation rights in order to maintain their respective ownership positions, and along with a commitment from Pierre Lassonde.

 

The Company has agreed to grant the Underwriters an over-allotment option to purchase up to an additional 5,490,000 Common Shares at the Offering Price, exercisable, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time on or prior to the date that is 30 days following the closing of the Offering to cover over-allotments, if any, and for market stabilization purposes. If this option is exercised in full, an additional C$11,254,500 in gross proceeds will be raised pursuant to the Offering and the aggregate gross proceeds of the Offering will be C$86,284,500.

 

The net proceeds from the Offering will be used for exploration and development activities at Camino Rojo and for general corporate purposes.

 

The Common Shares will be offered by way of a prospectus supplement to be filed in all provinces and territories of Canada, except Québec. The Common Shares will also be sold to U.S. buyers on a private placement basis pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements in Rule 144A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and other jurisdictions outside of Canada provided that no prospectus filing or comparable obligation arises.

 

The Offering is scheduled to close on or about April 3, 2020 and is subject to certain conditions including, but not limited to, the receipt of all necessary approvals including the approval of the Toronto Stock Exchange and the securities regulatory authorities.

 

This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in the United States, nor shall there be any sale of the securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful. The securities being offered have not been, nor will they be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) or any U.S. state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act, as amended, and applicable state securities laws.

 

1

 

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 200,000 hectares. Estimated Mineral Reserves as of June 24, 2019 are 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne (“g/t”) and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. (Comprised of Proven Mineral Reserves of 14,595,000 tonnes at 0.79 g/t gold and 15.1 g/t silver and Probable Mineral Reserves of 29,424,000 tonnes at 0.70 g/t gold and 13.7 g/t silver). The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the timing of closing the Offering, the use of proceeds from the Offering, the results of exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources and the Company’s objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions that all approvals of the Offering will be obtained, the Company’s activities will be in accordance with the Company’s public statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required approvals will be obtained and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of preliminary economic assessments, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources; and risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson
President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Etienne Morin

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

www.orlamining.com
info@orlamining.com

 

2

 

 

Exhibit 99.33

 

FORM 51-102F3

 

MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT

 

Item 1. Name and Address of Company

 

Orla Mining Ltd. (“Orla” or the “Company”)

202 – 595 Howe Street

Vancouver, BC

V6C 2T5

 

Item 2. Date of Material Change

 

March 23, 2020

 

Item 3. News Release

 

A news release announcing the material change was issued on March 23, 2020 via Canada Newswire and a copy was subsequently filed on SEDAR.

 

Item 4. Summary of Material Change

 

On March 23, 2020, the Company announced it had entered into a non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo Plc (“Fresnillo”) as to the commercial terms upon which Orla would obtain the right to expand its Camino Rojo project (“Camino Rojo”) oxide pit onto part of Fresnillo’s mineral concession located immediately to the north of Orla’s property under a definitive layback agreement (the “Layback Agreement”).

 

Item 5. Full Description of Material Change

 

On March 23, 2020, the Company announced that it had entered into a Layback Agreement with Fresnillo. On completion, the Layback Agreement will allow access to oxide and transitional heap leachable mineral resources (“Mineral Resources”) on Orla’s property below the open pit outlined in their June 2019 feasibility study. In addition, the Layback Agreement will provide the Company with the right to mine from Fresnillo’s mineral concession, and recover for Orla’s account, all oxide and transitional material amenable to heap leaching that are within an expanded open pit. The completion of the Layback Agreement is expected to result in a material increase in mineral reserves (“Mineral Reserves”) at Camino Rojo and the Company expects to publish an updated Mineral Reserve estimate for material on Orla’s concession following the completion of the Layback Agreement.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the Layback Agreement, the Company would pay Fresnillo total cash consideration of US$62.8 million, based on the following schedule:

 

·  US$10 million upon the execution of the definitive Layback Agreement;

 

·  US$15 million upon the Company having received all funding and permits required for construction and development; or July 1, 2020, whichever is sooner;

 

·  US$15 million not later than (i) twelve (12) months following the commencement of commercial production at Camino Rojo or (ii) December 1, 2022, whichever is earlier; and

 

·  US$22.8 million not later than (i) twenty-four (24) months following the commencement of commercial production at Camino Rojo or (ii) December 1, 2023, whichever is earlier.

 

The amounts for the third and fourth payments will bear an interest of 5% per annum from July 1, 2020, until the date of payment.

 

The letter agreement with Fresnillo is non-binding, has a term of 12 months and remains subject to completion of the definitive Layback Agreement between the parties which is currently underway and expected during the first half of 2020. The definitive Layback Agreement will not preclude or restrict Fresnillo from participating in any future development of the sulphide Mineral Resource at Camino Rojo.

 

- 2 -

 

The feasibility study on Camino Rojo dated June 25, 2019 titled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” (“Feasibility Study”) is constrained by the north boundary of Orla’s mineral concessions with Fresnillo’s mineral concession. The Feasibility Study supports a Mineral Reserve estimate of 44.0 million tonnes grading 0.73 grams per tonne gold and 14.2 grams per tonne silver out of a total Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource of 94.6 million tonnes grading 0.71 grams per tonne gold and 12.7 grams per tonne silver that is amenable to heap leaching. A portion of the Mineral Resources amenable to heap leaching that are not in the current Mineral Reserves are located just below the bottom of the pit outlined in the Feasibility Study and at relatively shallow depths on the north side of the pit. The Layback Agreement is expected to allow much of this material to be included in a revised mine plan using the same metallurgical recoveries for each rock type and similar operating costs as the Feasibility Study. Not all of the Mineral Resources amenable to heap leaching below the Feasibility Study pit are expected to be included in an updated mining study due to their depth and would likely only be included in future mine plans that consider mining and processing the surrounding sulphides.

 

As part of the Layback Agreement, the Company would also obtain the right to mine and recover all heap leachable material located on the Fresnillo concession in a pit mined for oxide and transitional material that is covered by the Layback Agreement. This material would result in additional gold and silver production to Orla’s account. Fresnillo drilled approximately 63 core holes totaling 33,253 metres targeting both near surface oxide mineralization and deep sulphide mineralization in the area covered by the Layback Agreement. The Company has received the drill data from Fresnillo but has not yet independently verified the results or undertaken any QA/QC analysis. However, results from Fresnillo holes drilled in close proximity to the most northern holes on the Orla property appear to be consistent with projections of the geological and oxidation models created from the Company’s data and assay results appear to be consistent with projections of Orla’s Mineral Resource model. Additional work, including an estimated 2,500 metres of drilling and detailed QA/QC on the Fresnillo data, and integration of Orla’s geological and resource models with Fresnillo’s drill data will be required to bring material on the Fresnillo concession to the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource category.

 

A revised feasibility study on a project unconstrained by Orla’s current property boundary is underway to determine the economic impact of the additional Mineral Resources from Orla’s concession available for processing as a result of the Layback Agreement. Importantly, an expanded operation would not require moving any of the infrastructure in the current design for the project and timelines for the permitting process, engineering, procurement and construction for the development of Camino Rojo will remain unchanged.

 

Camino Rojo continues to advance as planned with over 35% of the detailed engineering completed to date. The Company has begun purchasing long-lead items and construction is expected to start during the first half of 2020, upon receipt of all required permits. Orla is regularly assessing any potential impact or delays to the development schedule which could arise from the COVID-19 situation.

 

Orla believes that this agreement with Fresnillo will benefit both parties and the Company’s stakeholders, such as the local communities, through an expanded resource and an enhanced mine profile at Camino Rojo. Through collaboration with Fresnillo, the Company will be in a position to optimize the oxide deposit to its full potential by including the mineralization that would not otherwise be accessible without laying back Orla’s open pit onto Fresnillo’s concession, as well as mineralization located on the Fresnillo property. Orla is pleased to have reached this important value creating milestone in the development of Camino Rojo.

 

Item 6. Reliance on subsection 7.1(2) of National Instrument 51-102

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 7. Omitted Information

 

Not applicable.

 

- 3 -

 

Item 8. Executive Officer

 

Contact: Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer
Telephone: (604) 564-1852

 

Item 9. Date of Report

 

DATED as of this 25th day of March, 2020.

 

  ORLA MINING LTD.
   
  By: “Etienne Morin”
    Etienne Morin
    Chief Financial Officer

 

Forward-looking and Cautionary Statements

 

This material change report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the terms of the agreement in principle and the Layback Agreement, the expected additional material to be included in a future mine plan; timeline for completing a definitive Layback Agreement; results of a feasibility study, including but not limited to the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plan and operations, potential economic impact, internal rate of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present value, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; the timing and costs for production decisions; financing timelines and requirements; permitting timelines and requirements; requirements for additional land; exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources; upside opportunities including land agreements, the development of the sulphide mineral resource and exploration potential; timing for start of engineering work, construction, and receipt of permits; timing for first gold production; and the Company's objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward dlooking statements are discussed in this material change report, including without limitation, assumptions regarding price of gold and silver; the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: failing to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management and with respect to the Layback Agreement with Fresnillo; failing to receive the balance of the credit facility; risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, including changes in the economic parameters; risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses, as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company’s most recently filed management’s discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 28, 2019, available on www.sedar.com. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.34

 

 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

 

Year ended December 31, 2019

 

Canadian dollars

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

1. Overview

 

Orla Mining Ltd. is a mineral exploration and development company which trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol OLA. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. Refer to page 27 of this document for a list of abbreviations used.

 

Our corporate strategy is to acquire, develop and operate mineral properties where our expertise can substantially increase shareholder value. We have two material gold projects with near-term production potential based on open pit mining and heap leaching – the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema Gold Project in Panama.

 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019. You can find additional information regarding the Company, including our Annual Information Form, on SEDAR under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com.

 

All monetary amounts herein are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.

 

This MD&A is current as of March 23, 2020.

 

Hans Smit, P. Geo, is the Qualified Person, as the term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). He has reviewed and approved the technical information disclosed in this MD&A.

 

2. Highlights

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company:

 

· filed a final short form base shelf prospectus for offerings of up to $300 million,

 

· continued its exploration and evaluation activities at Camino Rojo,

 

· announced positive Feasibility Study results for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, and subsequently filed a NI 43-101 Technical Report,

 

· raised $3.6 million through its Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program,

 

· submitted applications and associated documentation for permits required to start construction and operation of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project,

 

· awarded the engineering, procurement, and construction management (“EPCM”) contract for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project.

 

· entered into a loan agreement for US$125 million for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project and received the first drawdown of US$25 million pursuant to this agreement,

 

· received approval from the Company's Board of Directors to commence project spending for immediate needs such as detailed engineering and the ordering of long lead items, and to commence project construction subject to the receipt of all required permits, and

 

· received approval from the Mexican federal environment department ("SEMARNAT") granting the Change of Land Use permit ("Cambio de Uso de Suelo" or "CUS/ETJ"), one of the two key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project.

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

3. Discussion of Operations

 

A. Camino Rojo, Mexico

 

Project Description and History

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine and consists of eight concessions covering in aggregate approximately 163,127 hectares. In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc. (now, “Newmont”). Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with untested exploration potential.

 

Canplats Resources Corporation (“Canplats”) initially discovered gold-silver mineralization at Camino Rojo in 2007, and subsequently completed 39,725 metres of drilling, largely delineating the shallow oxide mineralization. Canplats also carried out metallurgical studies prior to being acquired by Newmont in 2010. Newmont then completed more than 250,000 metres of drilling, conducted airborne and ground geophysical surveys, did extensive geological and mineralogical investigations, and conducted numerous metallurgical studies, which included detailed mineralogical studies, column leach tests on oxide material, size fraction analysis, variability test work and sulphide flotation studies.

 

The Ejido San Tiburcio holds the surface rights over the main area of known mineralization. Exploration has been carried out under the authority of agreements between the project operators and the Ejido San Tiburcio. There is a 30-year temporary occupation agreement in place with the Ejido San Tiburcio, with the right to expropriate, covering all the area of the mineral resource and area of potential development described in the Camino Rojo Report. Other temporary occupation agreements allow surface access for exploration activities in various other parts of the concession package. The Company has water rights in the area of the proposed development.

 

The Company has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. However, if sulphide projects are defined through one or more positive pre-feasibility studies with certain development scenarios meeting certain criteria, Newmont has an option to enter into a joint venture with Orla for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of such a sulphide project. If Newmont exercises its option, Orla’s share of the costs to develop the project can be, at Orla’s option, carried to production by Newmont. Orla has a right of first refusal on a sale if Newmont elects to sell its portion of the sulphide project, in whole or in part. The Camino Rojo Asset Purchase Agreement was filed on SEDAR on June 28, 2017. Details of the joint venture are available in our news release dated November 7, 2017, which is available here.

 

On June 24, 2019, we issued the results of a positive Feasibility Study along with a mineral reserve estimate on the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project. The Feasibility Study supports a technically simple open-pit mine and heap-leach operation with low capital and operating costs providing rapid payback and a strong financial return. An independent technical report prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 is available at www.sedar.com under Orla's profile. The new mineral reserve estimate at Camino Rojo includes proven and probable mineral reserves of 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne ("g/t") and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. All mineral reserves are contained and accessible from within Orla's mineral concessions.

 

Updated measured and indicated mineral resources, inclusive of mineral reserves, amount to 353.4 million tonnes at 0.83 g/t gold and 8.83 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 9.46 million ounces of gold and 100.4 million ounces of silver. Inferred mineral resources are 60.9 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold and 7.41 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 1.70 million ounces of gold and 14.5 million ounces of silver. Further details on the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates are provided below and can be found in the technical report dated June 25, 2019.

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

The Camino Rojo Feasibility Study considers near-surface open pit mining of 44.0 million tonnes of oxide and transitional ore at a throughput rate of 18,000 tonnes per day. Ore from the pit will be crushed to 80% passing 28 mm, conveyor stacked onto a heap leach pad and leached using a low concentration sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant where gold and silver will be precipitated and doré will be produced. The site's proximity to infrastructure, low stripping ratio, compact footprint and flat pad location all contribute to project simplicity and relatively low estimated all-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) of US$576 per ounce of gold.

 

The Feasibility Study was prepared by a team of independent industry experts led by Kappes Cassiday and Associates ("KCA") and supported by Independent Mining Consultants ("IMC"), Resource Geosciences Incorporated ("RGI"), Barranca Group LLC, Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., and HydroGeoLogica Inc. (“HGL”).

 

Economic Results

 

The Feasibility Study incorporates geological, assay, engineering, metallurgical, geotechnical, environmental and hydrogeological information collected by Orla and previous owners since 2007, including 370,566 metres of drilling in 911 holes. Predicted average gold recoveries of 64% are based on results from 85 column tests.

 

Operating costs are based on contract mining with all other mine components being owned and operated by Orla. Capital costs were estimated primarily using budgetary supplier quotes for all major and most minor equipment as well as contractor quotes for major construction contracts.

 

The following tables presents the key assumptions and detailed results of the Feasibility Study:

 

Table 1: Summary of Key Assumptions and Economic Results of the Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

Production Data Values Units
Life of Mine 6.8 years
Mine Throughput 18,000 tonnes/day
Mine Throughput 6,570,000 tonnes/year
Total Tonnes to Crusher 44,020,000 tonnes
Grade Au (Average) 0.73 g/t
Grade Ag (Average) 14.2 g/t
Contained Gold oz 1,031,000 ounces
Contained Silver oz 20,093,000 ounces
Metallurgical Recovery Gold (Overall) 64 %
Metallurgical Recovery Silver (Overall) 17 %
Average Annual Gold Production 97,000 ounces
Average Annual Silver Production 511,000 ounces
Total Gold Produced 662,000 ounces
Total Silver Produced 3,479,000 ounces
LOM Strip Ratio 0.54 waste:ore

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Operating Costs (Average LOM)    
Mining (mined) US$2.14 /tonne mined
Mining (processed) US$3.30 /tonne processed
Processing & Support US$3.38 /tonne processed
G&A US$1.75 /tonne processed
Total Operating Cost US$8.43 /tonne processed
By-Product Cash Cost US$515 /ounce Au
All-in Sustaining Cost US$576 /ounce Au

 

Capital Costs (excluding value added tax)    
Initial Capital US$123 million
LOM Sustaining Capital US$20 million
LOM Capital US$144 million
Working Capital and Initial Fills US$10 million
Closure Costs US$20 million

 

Financial Analysis    
Gold Price Assumption US$1,250 /ounce
Silver Price Assumption US$17 /ounce
Average Annual Cashflow (Pre-Tax) US$72 million
Average Annual Cashflow (After-Tax) US$56 million
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pre-Tax 38.6 %
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax 28.7 %
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax) US$227 million
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax) US$142 million
Pay-Back Period (After-Tax) 3.0 years

 

Note: See reference below regarding non-GAAP metrics. Feasibility Study economics include a 2% royalty and use a USD:MXN exchange rate of 19.3

 

The proposed mine is located 3 kilometres from a paved four lane highway and approximately 190 kilometres from the city of Zacatecas. The area is flat and there are no known social or environmental impediments to mining. Orla has all surface, mineral and water rights required to develop the project as presented in the Feasibility Study and existing wells produce in excess of the average 24 litres per second of water required for the project.

 

There are no residents within the area of proposed development. The town of San Tiburcio is located 4 kilometres to the east of the proposed development. Orla has a Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement with the Ejido San Tiburcio and a 30-year temporary occupation agreement with an expropriation right over the 2,497 hectares covering the proposed pit and infrastructure area. Orla has an active community and social program in San Tiburcio and other nearby communities of El Berrendo and San Francisco de los Quijano.

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

We expect to commence construction of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project in the first half of 2020 upon receipt of all required permits and completion of project financing. First gold production is planned for mid-2021.

 

Sensitivity to Gold Price

 

Table 2: Project Economics Sensitivities to Gold Price

 

Gold Price (US$/oz) US$ 1,150 US$ 1,200 US$ 1,250 US$ 1,300 US$ 1,350 US$ 1,400
After-tax NPV 5% (US$ millions) US$ 109 US$ 125 US$ 142 US$ 158 US$ 174 US$ 190
After-tax IRR (%) 24.0% 26.4% 28.7% 31.0% 33.2% 35.4%
Payback (years) 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.6

 

Opportunities

 

The mine plan in the Feasibility Study was developed entirely on Orla's mineral concessions and constrained by the property boundary with no impact to land outside Orla’s mineral concessions. An agreement with the owner of the concession bordering Orla's to the north would allow for the open pit to extend onto the adjacent concession. Such agreement would result in an expanded pit with access to additional oxide and transitional material below the feasibility study pit, which would add to the mine life and/or annual throughput with only modest equipment and infrastructure additions. Orla is optimistic that an agreement can be reached with the owner of the adjacent concession.

 

The Feasibility Study only considers oxide and transitional material as testing shows gold cannot be economically recovered by the heap leach method from sulphide material. Orla is actively working on studies to investigate economic opportunities that may exist within the 7.3 million ounces of gold contained within the sulphide measured and indicated mineral resources.

 

Orla has title to mineral concessions covering a very large area around the Camino Rojo deposit. Overburden makes exploration challenging, but the discovery in 2007 of mineralization that is incorporated into this Feasibility Study and mineral resource estimate shows that shallow cover can hide very large near-surface deposits. Orla has been trying various exploration techniques and Induced Polarization ("IP") geophysics appears to be the most useful tool for identifying drill targets. Additional oxide material in the vicinity of the planned development area would leverage the infrastructure being proposed in the Feasibility Study. Any additional sulphide material could add to the long-term potential of the property.

 

Mineral Reserves

 

Camino Rojo comprises intrusive related, sedimentary strata hosted, polymetallic gold, silver, arsenic, zinc, and lead mineralization. The mineralized zones correspond to zones of sheeted sulphidic veins and veinlet networks, creating a bulk-mineable style of gold mineralization. Mineralization is almost completely oxidized to a depth of approximately 120 metres and then variably oxidized below (transitional to sulphide). The mineral resource estimate was divided into oxide, high and low transitional, and sulphide material. Only the oxide and transitional material were considered in the Feasibility Study for heap leach extraction.

 

The mineral reserve estimate for Camino Rojo is based on an open pit mine plan and mine production schedule developed by IMC. All mineral reserves are located on, and are accessible from, Orla's concessions and support the 6.8-year mine life.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The following table presents the initial mineral reserve estimation for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project. Proven and probable mineral reserves amount to 44.0 million tonnes at 0.73 g/t gold and 14.2 g/t silver for 1.03 million contained gold ounces and 20.1 million contained silver ounces. The mineral reserve was estimated based on a gold price of US$1,250 per ounce and a silver price of US$17.00 per ounce. Measured mineral resource in the mine production schedule was converted to proven mineral reserve and indicated mineral resource in the schedule was converted to probable mineral reserve.

 

Table 3: Camino Rojo Mineral Reserve Estimate

 

Reserve Class   000's tonnes Gold (g/t) Silver (g/t) Gold (koz) Silver (koz)
Proven Mineral Reserve 14,595 0.79 15.1 369.7 7,104
Probable Mineral Reserve 29,424 0.70 13.7 661.1 12,991
Total Proven & Probable Reserve 44,019 0.73 14.2 1,031.0 20,095
Notes:
1. The mineral reserve estimate has an effective date of June 24, 2019. Mineral reserves are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council (as amended) in accordance with the disclosure requirement of NI 43-101
2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding
3. Mineral reserves are based on prices of US$1,250/oz gold, US$17/oz silver, USD/MXN exchange rate of 19.3
4. Mineral reserves are based on net smelter return cut-off that vary by time period to balance mine and plant production capacities. They range from a low of US$4.73/t to a high of US$9.00/t
5. Operating costs — mining US$1.94/t mined; process US$3.41/t processed; G&A US$1.32/t processed, includes a 2% royalty
6. Recoveries for gold — Kp 70%, Ki 56%, Transition Hi 60%; Transition Lo 40%;
Recoveries for silver — Kp 11%, Ki 15%, TrHi 27%, TrLo 34%7.
7. Gold and silver 100% payable; Refining cost per ounce — Au US$5.00; Ag US$0.50/oz

 

Mineral Resources

 

As part of the Feasibility Study efforts, IMC updated the mineral resource estimate from the previous estimate prepared as of April 27, 2018 and previously reported in Orla's May 29, 2018 news release. Mineral resources were divided between oxide and transitional material that could possibly be extracted by open pit mine and processed in a heap leach operation ("Leach Resource") and sulphide material that could possibly be extracted by open pit and processed in a mill ("Mill Resource"). For the Mill Resource, estimates were made for contained gold, silver, lead and zinc. As lead and zinc would not be recovered in a heap leach operation, only gold and silver were estimated for the Leach Resource.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Table 4: Camino Rojo Mineral Resource Estimate — Gold & Silver

 

Resource Type 000's tonnes Gold
(g/t)
Silver
(g/t)
Gold
(koz)
Silver
(koz)
Leach Resource   Measured Mineral Resource 19,391 0.77 14.9 482.3 9,305
Indicated Mineral Resource 75,249 0.70 12.2 1,680.7 29,471
Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource 94,640 0.71 12.7 2,163.0 38,776
Inferred Mineral Resource 4,355 0.86 5.6 119.8 805
     

Mill Resource

Measured Mineral Resource 3,358 0.69 9.2 74.2 997
Indicated Mineral Resource 255,445 0.88 7.4 7,221.4 60,606
Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource 258,803 0.88 7.4 7,295.6 61,603
Inferred Mineral Resource 56,564 0.87 7.5 1,576.9 13,713
       
Total Mineral Resource Measured Mineral Resource 22,749 0.76 14.1 556.5 10,302
Indicated Mineral Resource 330,694 0.84 8.5 8,902.1 90,078
Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource 353,443 0.83 8.8 9,458.6 100,379
Inferred Mineral Resource 60,919 0.87 7.4 1,696.7 14,518

 

Table 5: Camino Rojo Mineral Resource Estimate — Zinc & Lead

 

Resource Type   000's tonnes Lead
(%)
Zinc
(%)
Lead
(M lbs)
Zinc
(M lbs)
Mill Resource Measured Mineral Resource 3,358 0.13 0.38 9.3 28.2
Indicated Mineral Resource 255,445 0.07 0.26 404.3 1,468.7
Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource 258,803 0.07 0.26 413.6 1,496.8
Inferred Mineral Resource 56,564 0.05 0.23 63.1 290.4
Notes:
1. The mineral resource has an effective date of June 7, 2019. The mineral resources are classified in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards in accordance with the disclosure requirement of NI 43-101
2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding
3. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability
4. Mineral resources for leach material are based on prices of US$1,400/oz gold and US$20/oz silver
5. Mineral resources for mill material are based on prices of US$1,400/oz gold, US$20/oz silver, US$1.05/lb lead, and US$1.20/lb zinc
6. Mineral resources are based on net smelter return cut-off of US$4.73/t for leach material and US$13.71/t for mill material
7. Includes 2% royalty and an USD:MXN exchange rate of 19.3
8. Operating costs for Leach resource — mining US$1.65/t mined; process US$3.41/t processed; G&A US$1.32/t processed; Operating costs for Mill resource — mining US$1.65/t mined; process US$12.50/t processed; G&A US$1.20/t processed
9. Leach resource payable — Au 100%; Ag 100%;
Mill resource payable — Au 95%, Ag 95%, Pb 95%, Zn 85%
10. Leach resource refining costs — Au US$5.00/oz; Ag US$0.50/oz; Mill resource refining costs — Au US$1.00/oz; Ag US$1.50/oz; Pb US$0.194/lb; Zn US$0.219/lb
11. The mineral resource estimate assumes that the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto land held by the adjacent owner. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the adjacent owner

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

12. Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves
13. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an indicated mineral resource and must not be converted to a mineral reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated mineral resources with continued exploration.

 

All the mineralization comprised in the mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate "reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction" extends onto lands where mineral title is held by an adjacent owner and that waste would be mined on the adjacent owner's mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that would include an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate (oxide and sulphide material) would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with that property owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the adjacent property owner. Delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Orla intends to seek an agreement with the adjacent owner, to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. We cannot give any assurance that we will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. The development scenario presented in the Feasibility Study, including the mineral reserve estimate, does not require a layback agreement with the adjacent owner.

 

Additional details on mineral reserve and resource assumptions, risks and data verification can be found in the independent technical report dated June 25, 2019 prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 available at www.sedar.com under Orla's profile.

 

Qualified Persons

 

The Feasibility Study was overseen by KCA of Reno, Nevada. IMC of Tucson, Arizona conducted the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates under the direction of Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM. Mr. Hester was also responsible for the mining components of the Feasibility Study. KCA, under the direction of Carl Defilippi, RM SME, was responsible for the metallurgy, process, general and administration and economic components of the Feasibility Study. Matthew Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. (AIPG), of Resource Geosciences Incorporated of Rio Rico, Arizona was responsible for the property, geology and environmental components of the Feasibility Study. David Hawkins, C.P.G. (AIPG), was responsible for the hydrogeology model. Each of Messrs. Hester, Defilippi, Gray and Hawkins is a Qualified Person for their respective sections of the Feasibility Study and each of whom is independent of Orla under the definitions of NI 43-101.

 

Permitting

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by SEMARNAT, the federal government department which has authority over the two principal permits: (1) the Environmental Impact Statement (“Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental” or “MIA”, accompanied by a Risk Study), and (2) a Change of Land Use permit (“CUS”) accompanied by a Technical Justification Study (“ETJ”).

 

In early 2018, Orla resumed environmental assessment activities on the project and surrounding area under the guidance of independent environmental permitting consultant Patricia Aguayo. Data from this work was used in conjunction with information collected by previous operators and project information collected from Orla's consulting engineers to prepare the documents needed to apply for the MIA and CUS permits. The project is not located in an area with any special federal environmental protection designation and no factors were identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required environmental permits.

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Permitting documents were submitted to SEMARNAT during the third quarter of 2019. The Company was notified that the CUS was accepted on December 12, 2019 and paid the required fees on January 17, 2020. The Company received a series of questions and requests for additional information on the MIA on November 12, 2019. This is a normal part of the process. A reply was submitted to this on December 20, 2019. On January 13, 2020, SEMARNAT notified the Company of a one-time 60 working-day extension to the MIA review. This would result in the review being completed in mid April 2020.

 

Orla has contracted ERM, a global consulting company, to review the environmental assessment and proposed mitigation measures for the project. We plan to complete this work in accordance with International Finance Corporation Performance Standards, as well as the International Council on Mining and Metals principles.

 

Development activities

 

Subsequent to the permit applications being submitted, we have focussed our work on the detailed engineering and planning required to start construction in 2020. In September 2019, we awarded the engineering, procurement, and construction management (“EPCM”) contract for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project to M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation (“M3”), a full service EPCM firm headquartered in Tucson, Arizona.

 

As of the date of this document, approximately 35% of the detailed engineering has been completed. We have placed purchase orders for the crushing package and the heap leach stacking system. Hiring of key personnel at site is substantially complete.

 

Other development related activities in 2019 included drilling 2 water exploration holes, and drilling and establishing 11 groundwater monitoring wells and 2 production wells, for a total of 2,413 metres of drilling. Other work included detailed surveying and additional geotechnical investigations and improvements to the existing camp to accommodate more people.

 

Camino Rojo Project Loan

 

In December 2019, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) and certain other lenders with respect to a credit debt facility of US$125 million for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility was arranged by Trinity Capital and includes a syndicate of lenders led by Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”), Pierre Lassonde, and Trinity Capital.

 

The Credit Facility provides a total of US$125 million to the Company, available in three tranches. The first tranche of US$25 million was drawn down by the Company on December 18, 2019 upon execution of the definitive loan documentation. Tranches 2 and 3 provide US$50 million each, available for drawdown after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of certain key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo project.

 

The Credit Facility is denominated in United States dollars, and bears interest at 8.80% per annum, payable quarterly commencing March 31, 2020. The principal amount is due upon maturity at December 18, 2024, with no scheduled principal payments prior to maturity. The Company may prepay the loan, in full or in part, at any time during the term without penalty, by using cash flow from operations. The Credit Facility does not impose on the Company any mandatory requirements of hedging, production payments, offtake, streams, or royalties.

 

On December 18, 2019, the Company issued 32.5 million common share purchase warrants to the lenders as part of the project loan. The warrants have an exercise price of C$3.00 per warrant and an expiry date of December 18, 2026, to the lenders.

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Regional exploration

 

As well as development related activities, we continue to conduct a limited regional exploration program. Work completed in 2019 included geological mapping, rock sampling, geophysics and 8 RC drill holes. A total of 271 line-km of Induced Potential (“IP”) were conducted, including 157 line-km in a survey to the southeast of the resource and proposed development area that tested the projection of the San Tiburcio fault, a structure considered important to the emplacement of the known mineralization. The other 112 line-km were completed in the southwest part of the property in a number of small grids centered on overburden covered areas with potential structural intercepts and indications of alteration in the general vicinity. One of the grids showed a well-defined chargeability anomaly that is roughly 1,000 by 400 metres in size. It is in an area with large structures and rock outcrops to the southeast have zones with strong silicification and weakly anomalous trace-element geochemistry. The area of the anomaly is covered by overburden. We have received permits to allow drill testing of the anomaly.

 

Low amplitude chargeability anomalies southeast and west of the resource area outlined in the IP survey were tested with 8 RC holes totalling 2,536 metres. No significant alteration was encountered. The anomalies are assumed to be related to groundwater with elevated total dissolved solids concentration encountered in the holes.

 

Work on the project will continue to focus on development related activities with production estimated to start in mid 2021. Regional exploration will continue to involve geology and sampling followed by geophysics in areas where potentially favourable indicators are found. The IP anomaly in the southwest part of the property will be drilled tested, as will a coincident IP and magnetic anomaly northeast of the resource area.

 

Community and social

 

The Company maintains an active community and social relations (“CSR”) program. Significant CSR activities in 2019 included:

 

· completed construction of a preschool in El Berrendo,
· continued to support Adult Education programs,
· held Introduction to Mining courses for local residents,
· supported a number of community events,
· held a cervical cancer detection clinic in coordination with the Zacatecas health authorities,
· supported San Tiburcio to reactivate the construction of a local health center and in efforts to have a doctor assigned to the community,
· completed a cooperation agreement to support police officers stationed in San Tiburcio. To date, we’ve provided furniture and kitchen supplies,
· assisted local communities to improve water wells.

 

B. Cerro Quema Project, Panama

 

Project Description and History

 

Our 100%-owned Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open pit mine with process by heap leaching. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the areas of the current mineral resources and mineral reserves, proposed mine development, and the priority drill targets.

 

Mineral concessions are comprised of three contracts between the Republic of Panama and Minera Cerro Quema SA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Orla. The original 20-year term for these concessions expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). The Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications were received, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal. We have received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. A permit was received on May 8, 2018 to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018, we received two permits to use water for drilling. An existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current mineral resources was extended for two years in May 2018. In October 2018, the government accepted our 2018 concession tax payments, and in February 2019, we paid the 2019 concession tax payments. A new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions was received on February 11, 2019. All drill permits are currently active. General elections were held in Panama in May 2019, which resulted in a change in federal government effective July 1, 2019. Subsequent to this, two permits allowing temporary use of water for exploration drilling were received on November 12, 2019 and an additional two temporary water permits were received on January 13, 2020.

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

On February 3, 2020, the annual concession payments were made and accepted.

 

The Company owns the surface rights for land required to mine the Cerro Quema mineral reserves and to construct and operate a heap leach facility.

 

A predecessor company to Orla issued a mineral resource estimate and a Pre-Feasibility Study for Cerro Quema, and an independent technical report entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”).

 

The Cerro Quema Report envisions a standard open pit mine with two pits, one at La Pava and one at Quemita, coupled with a 10,000 tonne per day heap leach facility to extract the gold. The project estimates average head grade of 0.77 g/t Au, crush size of 80% passing minus 50 mm, and an average gold recovery of 86%. This would result in 418,000 ounces of gold production over a 5.3-year mine life.

 

The Cerro Quema Report, which contains the 2014 mineral resource and mineral reserve estimate and Pre-Feasibility Study, was filed on SEDAR by Pershimco Resources Inc. on August 22, 2014. You can download it from SEDAR here.

 

Table 6: Cerro Quema Mineral Reserves

 

Zone   Category   Cut-Off
(Au g/t)
    Tonnes (millions)     Au
(g/t)
    Au
(koz)
 
La Pava   Proven     0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
    Probable     0.21       7.40       0.67       159  
    Sub-Total     0.21       14.22       0.73       335  
Quema   Proven     0.21                    
    Probable     0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
    Sub-Total     0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
Total   Proven     0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
    Probable     0.21       12.89       0.75       312  
    Total     0.21       19.71       0.77       488  

 

Notes:
(1) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
(2) A cut-off grade of 0.21 g/t of gold is used for reporting mineral reserves.
(3) Mineral reserves are estimated at a gold price of US$1,300 per ounce.
(4) Effective as of June 30, 2014.
(5) See NI 43-101 Technical Report “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” published on August 15, 2014 for additional information. A copy of the report is available on the Company’s website and under the SEDAR profile of Pershimco Resources Inc. at www.sedar.com.

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Environmental and permitting

 

The Company has an ongoing environmental management plan that includes maintaining sediment dams, reforestation of previously disturbed areas and active sediment control activities. Baseline surface water quality sampling and groundwater level measurements are also ongoing.

 

CSR

 

The Company has an active community relations program that includes providing hot lunches to 5 to 15-year-old children studying in the 12 schools located within a 15-kilometre radius of the Cerro Quema project. We also provide support for various local amateur sports teams, a youth orchestra, local fairs, and cultural events.

 

Exploration

 

There were no notable exploration activities at Cerro Quema in 2019.

 

Pre-Feasibility Study

 

In 2020, we plan to update the Cerro Quema Pre-Feasibility Study (“PFS”) on the oxide heap leach gold project initially completed in 2014. This will include updated mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates. In addition to the work on oxide mineralization, we will continue to advance exploration of the Caballito copper-gold sulphide discovery. This style of mineralization, identified in 2018, presents potential value to the project in addition to the current heap-leach oxide gold project. In addition to the 1.2 km long trend north of Caballito through to Quemita, the Pelona area in the eastern part of the project provides extensive target areas for additional Caballito-style mineralization.

 

C. Non-GAAP Measures

 

We have included certain non-GAAP performance measures as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers and the non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to the Company.

 

Cash Costs per Ounce —

 

We calculated cash costs per ounce by dividing the sum of operating costs, royalty costs, production taxes, refining and shipping costs, net of by-product silver credits, by payable gold ounces. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, we believe that this measure is useful to external users in assessing operating performance.

 

All-In Sustaining Costs ("AISC") —

 

We have provided an AISC performance measure that reflects all the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, our definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. We believe that this measure is useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow from current operations. Subsequent amendments to the guidance have not materially affected the figures presented.

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

4. Summary of Annual Results

 

The figures in the following table are based on the financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.

 

    2019-Q4     2019-Q3     2019-Q2     2019-Q1     2018-Q4     2018-Q3     2018-Q2     2018-Q1  
Exploration expense   $ 4,037     $ 4,784     $ 3,515     $ 7,503     $ 6,066     $ 7,056     $ 4,438     $ 5,273  
General and administrative     194       127       162       217       183       144       126       108  
Professional fees     215       223       148       125       176       79       202       136  
Regulatory and transfer agent     146       39       46       41       205       19       14       40  
Salaries and wages     951       556       564       550       836       422       230       234  
Depreciation     7       34       23       39       40       40       37       36  
Share based payments     473       758       907       1,253       1,065       601       1,523       796  
Interest income     (29 )     (21 )     (30 )     (62 )     (105 )     (134 )     (117 )     (86 )
Interest expense     104       2       1                                
Amortization of loan costs     112                                            
Foreign exchange     183       (1 )     11       13       (133 )     10       (146 )     (6 )
Accretion in value of Newmont loan     402       638       76       357       187       153       100       65  
Net loss   $ 6,795     $ 7,139     $ 5,423     $ 10,040     $ 8,520     $ 8,390     $ 6,407     $ 6,596  
Loss per share (basic and diluted)   $ 0.03     $ 0.04     $ 0.03     $ 0.06     $ 0.05     $ 0.05     $ 0.04     $ 0.04  

 

We acquired the Cerro Quema project at the end of 2016, and the Camino Rojo project at the end of 2017. In 2018, we conducted work on both Cerro Quema and Camino Rojo.

 

In 2019, we continued work on, completed, and publicly filed the feasibility study for Camino Rojo. We commenced detailed engineering and planning for construction of Camino Rojo. Quarterly variations are due to seasonality and timing of mining concession fees, drilling activities and awaiting results from previous quarters’ exploration activities.

 

Administrative costs and professional fees have trended with the level of activity of the Company, and with major regulatory events such as financings and public listings. In 2018-Q4 we commenced trading on the TSX Exchange, and in 2019-Q4 we closed a US$125 million project credit facility – both events caused one-time increases in regulatory fees and legal fees.

 

The increase in salaries and wages in 2017-Q4 was related to an accrual of short-term incentive (bonus) payments, as was the increase in 2018-Q3. In 2018-Q4, we accrued for payments related to the departure of the former CEO. Salaries have generally increased in 2019 as we have grown our team in preparation for the construction phase at Camino Rojo.

 

Share based payments expense is generally related to the number of stock options and RSUs outstanding vesting during the quarter. The grants occurred during 2017-Q2, 2018-Q2, and 2019-Q1; consequently, those quarters tend to be greater than the others as much of the vesting occurs on the date of the grant. The increase in share-based payments in 2018-Q4 was related to options and bonus shares granted to the incoming CEO.

 

Interest income is directly related to cash on hand and prevailing interest rates.

 

The Company received US$25 million in 2019-Q4 as a first draw on the Camino Rojo project loan, which caused an increase in interest expense, and we can expect swings in foreign exchange gains and losses, starting in that quarter.

 

Foreign exchange gains and losses vary based on fluctuation of the Canadian dollar versus US dollar and Mexican peso amounts on hand.

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

5. Fourth Quarter of 2019

 

The following table is based on financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Figures are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars.

 

A. Comparison to the previous quarter

 

    2019-Q4     2019-Q3     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense   $ 4,037     $ 4,784     $ (747 )   Planned decreased activity in drilling, geophysics, and environmental as necessary reports and data collection related to the feasibility study at Camino Rojo had been completed.  Partly offset by increases in engineering, project management, and site activities as we prepare for construction.
General and administrative     194       127       67      
Professional fees     215       223       (8 )    
Regulatory and transfer agent     146       39       107     TSX fees related to the warrants issued as part of the Credit Facility
Salaries and wages     951       556       395     Severance payments
Depreciation     7       34       (27 )    
Share based payments     473       758       (285 )   Issuance and vesting of equity compensation.
Interest income     (29 )     (21 )     (8 )    
Interest expense     104       2       102     Drawdown on the project loan during Q4
Amortization of loan costs     112             112     Drawdown on the project loan during Q4
Foreign exchange     183       (1 )     (184 )   The Credit Facility is denominated in US$, which causes greater swings in FX.  The C$ weakened during the latter half of December, giving rise to this FX loss.
Changes in value of Newmont loan     402       638       236     Due to time value accretion
Loss for the quarter   $ 6,795     $ 7,139     $ (344 )    

 

Page 15

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

B. Comparison to the same quarter last year

 

    2019-Q4     2018-Q4     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense   $ 4,037     $ 6,053     $ (2,016 )   Planned decrease in activities at Cerro Quema in 2019.  Decreased spending at Camino Rojo in Q4-2019 compared to same quarter last year as a result of having completed the feasibility study during 2019.
Office and administrative     194       183       11      
Professional fees     215       176       39     Increased legal and advisory work related to the Camino Rojo project loan.
Regulatory and transfer agent     146       205       (59 )   Cost related to graduation from TSX-V to TSX in Q4-2018.
Salaries and wages     951       836       115     Increased staffing as we prepare for construction activities.
Depreciation     7       53       (46 )    
Share based payments     473       1,065       (592 )   Bonus shares issued to incoming CEO in 2018-Q4.
Interest income     (29 )     (105 )     76     Lower cash balances on hand.
Interest expense     104             104     No debt last year.
Amortization of loan costs     112             112     No debt last year.
Foreign exchange     183       (133 )     316      
Change in value of Newmont loan     402       187       215     Larger loan balance, closer to maturity.
Loss for the quarter   $ 6,795     $ 8,520     $ (1,725 )    

 

6. Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

The Company had working capital of approximately $27.1 million as at December 31, 2019, compared with $13.6 million at December 31, 2018.

 

Historically the Company's primary source of funding has been the issuance of equity securities for cash, typically through private placements to sophisticated investors and institutions. We have issued common share capital in many of the past few years, pursuant to private placement financings and the exercise of warrants and options. Our access to exploration and construction financing is always uncertain, and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant equity or debt funding.

 

During Q2 and Q3 of 2019, the early warrant exercise program, as well as other warrant and option exercises, provided $4.0 million in cash. During Q4, we received US$25 million ($32.8 million) as part of the US$125 million Credit Facility.

 

As part of the acquisition of the Camino Rojo Gold Project in November 2017, Newmont agreed to provide interest free loans to the Company for all annual land holding costs as they are incurred at Camino Rojo until December 31, 2019, which loans are to be repaid in cash or shares (at Orla’s option subject to certain restrictions) upon reaching commercial production at Camino Rojo. To December 31, 2019, a total of MXN 219 million ($15.1 million) had been advanced pursuant to this agreement.

 

Our ability to carry out our long range strategic objectives in future periods depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing activities. We expect to fund the operating costs and the operating and strategic objectives of the Company over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand, and with further equity financings and draws from the Camino Rojo project loan.

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Company had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2019. As of the date of this MD&A, the Company had issued purchase orders for long-lead equipment in the amount of US$20,877,000.

 

7. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements requiring disclosure under this section.

 

8. Related Party Transactions

 

This information is provided in note 14 of the accompanying financial statements.

 

9. Critical Accounting Estimates

 

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

We review estimates and their underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.

 

Judgements, estimates, and assumptions that we have made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in these consolidated financial statements include:

 

Functional currency

 

The functional currency for the parent entity and each of its subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of functional currency involves judgements to identify the primary economic environment. We reconsider the functional currency of each entity if there is a change in the underlying transactions, events and conditions which we used to determine the primary economic environment of that entity.

 

Business combinations

 

Determining whether a set of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute the acquisition of a business or the acquisition of an asset requires us to make certain judgements as to whether or not the assets acquired and liabilities assumed include the inputs, processes and outputs necessary to constitute a business as defined in IFRS 3 «Business Combinations». If an acquired set of assets and liabilities includes goodwill, the set is presumed to be a business. Based on an assessment of relevant facts and circumstances, management of the Company concluded that the acquisitions of Cerro Quema in 2016 and of Camino Rojo in 2017 were acquisitions of assets. The values assigned to common shares, stock options and warrants issued and the allocation of the purchase price to the net assets in the acquisition were based on estimates and judgements including discount rates, volatility, expected duration of option and warrant and the relative fair values of the net assets.

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Exploration and evaluation expenditures

 

The application of the Company’s accounting policy for E&E expenditure requires judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely from either future exploitation or sale (prior to which we expense all E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we capitalize the acquisition costs). It also requires us to make judgements on whether activities have reached a stage that permits development of the mineral resource (prior to which they are treated as E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we treat such costs as projects under development and construction).

 

We must also apply a number of estimates and assumptions, such as the determination of the quantities and types of mineral resources, which itself involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on resource classification (measured, indicated or inferred). These estimates directly impact accounting decisions related to our E&E expenditures.

 

We must make certain estimates and assumptions about future events and circumstances, particularly, whether economic mineral exploitation is viable. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, we assess indicators of impairment and may conclude to write off such amounts to the statement of profit or loss.

 

Title to mineral properties

 

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. Further, we make judgements for properties where concessions terms have expired, and a renewal application has been made and is awaiting approval. We use judgement as to whether the concession renewal application is probable to be received, but ultimately this is beyond our control. If a renewal application is not approved, we could lose rights to those concession.

 

Assessment of impairment indicators

 

We apply judgement in assessing whether indicators of impairment or reverse impairment exist for our E&E assets which could result in a test for impairment. We consider internal and external factors, such as our rights to explore, planned expenditures on E&E activities, the technical results of our E&E activities, and the potential for viable operations, to determine whether there are any indicators of impairment or reversal of a previous impairment.

 

Share based payments

 

We issue, grant or award different types of share based payments. These include warrants, options, restricted share units, deferred share units, and bonus shares.

 

We make judgments of expected forfeiture rates, the expected lives of these instrument, expected volatilities, and risk free interest rates. In a unit offering, we prorate the proceeds between common shares and warrants using the relative fair value method, the allocation of which requires significant judgement. In the case of bonus shares we use our judgement to estimate expected vesting periods and vesting probabilities.

 

Site closure provisions

 

We make estimates and assumptions in determining the provisions for asset retirement and site closure. The ultimate rehabilitation costs are uncertain, and cost estimates can vary in response to many factors, including judgements of the extent of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, and regulatory changes. We make estimates of rehabilitation costs and of cost increases, inflation rates, and discount rates. These uncertainties will result in actual future expenditures differing from the amounts currently provided. Consequently, there could be significant adjustments to the provisions established, which would affect future financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position.

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

10. Financial Instruments

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is inherently exposed to certain financial risks, including market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk, through the use of financial instruments. The timeframe and the manner in which we manage these risks varies based upon our assessment of these risks and available alternatives for mitigation. We do not acquire or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All transactions undertaken are to support our operations.

 

A discussion of these financial risks and our exposure to them is provided in the notes to the accompanying interim financial statements, and in the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

11. Outstanding Share Data

 

As of the date of this MD&A, the Company had the following equity securities outstanding:

 

· 187,192,168 common shares

 

· 50,703,100 warrants

 

· 9,827,336 stock options

 

· 1,500,000 bonus shares

 

· 1,014,972 restricted share units

 

· 508,780 deferred share units

 

You can find further details about these potentially issuable securities in the notes to the accompanying audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

12. Subsequent Event

 

On March 23, 2020, the Company announced that it had entered into a non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo Plc (“Fresnillo”) regarding the commercial terms on which Orla would obtain the right to expand the Camino Rojo oxide pit onto part of Fresnillo’s mineral concession located immediately to the north of Orla’s property under a definitive layback agreement. Under the terms of the layback agreement, Orla would pay Fresnillo, total cash consideration of US$62.8 million over a period of approximately 3.5 years. For further information on the transaction, please refer to the news release dated March 23, 2020 which can be found on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

13. Risks and Uncertainties

 

As the Company has not commenced principal operations, historical revenue and expenditure trends are not indicative of future activity. The Company has committed to certain work expenditures and may enter into future agreements. The ability of the Company to fund its future operations and commitments is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing. Risks of the Company’s business include the following:

 

Permits and Licenses

 

The exploitation and development of mineral properties may require the Company to obtain regulatory or other permits and licenses from various governmental licensing bodies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain all necessary permits and licenses that may be required to carry out exploration, development and mining operations on its properties.

 

The Company is awaiting mineral concession renewals at its Cerro Quema Project. There is no assurance that we will receive necessary approvals or extensions, or receive them within a reasonable period of time. Failure to receive the permits or extensions would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations. Additional details are provided in the Cerro Quema Project section of this document.

 

The timing of our ability to construct a mine at Camino Rojo is subject to, and may be affected by, timely review and approval by the Mexican environmental and permitting authorities.

 

Foreign Country and Political Risk

 

The Company’s principal mineral properties are located in Mexico and Panama. The Company is subject to certain risks, including currency fluctuations, possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mineral titles or other mineral rights, opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations, and mineral exploration and mining activities may be affected in varying degrees by political stability and government regulations relating to the mining industry. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its business. Exploration and development may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on future exploitation and production, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange controls, income taxes, royalties on production, expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine and/or site safety.

 

Operating in developing economies such as Mexico and Panama has certain risks, including changes to, or invalidation of, government mining regulations; expropriation or revocation of land or property rights; changes in foreign ownership rights; changes in foreign taxation rates; security issues; corruption; uncertain political climate; narco-terrorist actions or activities; and lack of a stable economic climate.

 

We do not carry political risk insurance.

 

Dependence on Exploration-Stage Properties

 

The Company’s current efforts are focused primarily on exploration stage properties. The Camino Rojo and the Cerro Quema Projects may not develop into commercially viable ore bodies, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s potential mineral resource production, profitability, financial performance and results of operations.

 

Estimates of Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves and Production Risks

 

The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates included in this MD&A are estimates based on a number of assumptions, including those stated herein, and any adverse change to those assumptions could require the Company to lower its mineral resource estimate. Until a deposit is actually mined and processed, the quantity and grades of mineral resources must be considered as estimates only. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. In addition, the quantity and/or economic viability of mineral resources may vary depending on, among other things, metal prices, grades, production costs, stripping ratios, recovery rates, permit regulations and other legal requirements, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions. Any material change in the quantity of mineral resources or grade may affect the economic viability of the Company’s properties. No assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of minerals will in fact be realized or that an identified mineral resource will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) deposit that can be legally and economically exploited. There can also be no assurance that any discoveries of new mineral reserves will be made. Any material reductions in estimates of mineral resources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Camino Rojo Gold Project mineral resource estimate assumes that the Company can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Company

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by another mining company (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study dated June 25, 2019, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The Feasibility Study was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the Feasibility Study.

 

Mineral resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions

 

The estimation of mineral resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

In particular, the estimation of mineral resources for the Camino Rojo Gold Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the mineral resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached.

 

Although all mineralization included in the Company’s mineral resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Gold Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the mineral resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in mineral resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Mining Industry

 

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the current exploration programs planned by the Company will result in a profitable commercial mining operation.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on many factors, some of which are the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as metal prices which are highly cyclical and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

 

Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk. The Company’s operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration and development of ore, including unusual and unexpected geology formations, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. The Company’s mineral exploration activities are directed towards the search, evaluation and development of mineral deposits. There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Company as described herein will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of ore. There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the discovery and acquisition of properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company will compete with other interests, many of which with greater financial resources, for the opportunity to participate in promising projects. Significant capital investment is required to achieve commercial production from successful exploration efforts.

 

Government Regulation

 

The exploration activities of the Company are subject to various federal, provincial and local laws governing prospecting, development, taxes, labour standards, toxic substances and other matters. Exploration activities are also subject to various federal, provincial and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, and land reclamation. These laws also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Although the Company’s exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations governing operations and exploration activities, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations, amendments to current laws and regulations or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Company’s activities.

 

Title Matters

 

Although the Company has diligently investigated title to all mineral concessions (either granted or under re-application) and, to the best of its knowledge (except as otherwise disclosed herein), titles to all its properties are in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to any of the Company’s mineral properties and any of the Company’s properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected encumbrances or defects or governmental actions.

 

Land Title

 

The Company has investigated ownership of all surface rights in which it has an interest, and, to the best of its knowledge, its ownership rights are in good standing. However, all surface rights may be subject to prior claims or agreement transfers, and rights of ownership may be affected by undetected defects. While to the best of the Company's knowledge, titles to all surface rights are in good standing; however, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to the surface rights in which the Company has an interest. The properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and titles may be affected by undetected defects.

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Environmental Risks and Hazards

 

All phases of the Company’s mineral exploration operations are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulations, laws and permits, if any, will not adversely affect the Company’s operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which the Company holds interests which are unknown to the Company at present, which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties. The Company may become liable for such environmental hazards caused by previous owners and operators of the properties even where it has attempted to contractually limit its liability.

 

Government approvals and permits are currently, and may in the future be, required in connection with the Company’s operations. To the extent such approvals are required and not obtained; the Company may be curtailed or prohibited from proceeding with planned exploration or development of mineral properties.

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

 

Commodity Prices

 

The profitability of mining operations is significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold and other minerals. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of these minerals and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in metal prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The price of gold and other minerals has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future serious price declines could cause commercial production to be impracticable.

 

Uninsured Risks

 

The Company carries insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers adequate. Risks not insured against include environmental pollution or other hazards against which such corporations cannot insure or against which they may elect not to insure.

 

Compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws

 

Orla is subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (1999). In general, these laws prohibit a company and its employees and intermediaries from bribing or making other prohibited payments to foreign officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. The Company’s primary operations are located in Panama, a country which is perceived as having fairly high levels of corruption. Orla cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future anti- corruption regulatory requirements to which the Company’s operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

 

Failure to comply with the applicable legislation and other similar foreign laws could expose the Company and/or its senior management to civil and/or criminal penalties, other sanctions and remedial measures, legal expenses and reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the applicable anti-corruption legislation by Canadian or foreign authorities could also have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

As a consequence of these legal and regulatory requirements, the Company has instituted policies with regard to business ethics, which have been designed to ensure that Orla and its employees comply with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that such efforts have been and will be completely effective in ensuring the Company’s compliance, and the compliance of its employees, consultants, contractors and other agents, with all applicable anticorruption laws and regulations.

 

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

Certain directors of the Company also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in natural resource exploration and development. Consequently, there exists the possibility for such directors to be in a position of conflict. Any decision made by such directors involving the Company will be made in accordance with their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with the Company and such other companies. In addition, such directors will declare, and refrain from voting on, any matter in which such directors may have a conflict of interest.

 

Threat of Infectious Diseases or Outbreaks of Viruses

 

Global markets have been adversely impacted by emerging infectious diseases and/or the threat of outbreaks of viruses, other contagions or epidemic diseases, including the novel COVID-19, and many industries, including the mining industry have been impacted. This outbreak has led to a widespread crisis that is adversely affecting the economies and financial markets of many countries. If increased levels of volatility continue or in the event of a rapid destabilization of global economic conditions, there may be an adverse effect on commodity prices, demand for metals, availability of equity or credit, investor confidence, and general financial market liquidity, all of which may adversely affect the Company’s business and the market price of the Company’s securities.

 

In addition, there may not be an adequate response to emerging infectious diseases. There are potentially significant economic and social impacts, including labour shortages and shutdowns, delays and disruption in supply chains, social unrest, government or regulatory actions or inactions, including permanent changes in taxation or policies, decreased demand or the inability to sell and deliver concentrates and resulting commodities, declines in the price of commodities, delays in permitting or approvals, governmental disruptions or other unknown but potentially significant impacts.

 

At this time, the Company cannot accurately predict what impacts there will be or what effects these conditions will have on its business, including due to uncertainties relating to the ultimate geographic spread, the duration of the outbreak, and the length of restrictions or responses that have been or may be imposed by the governments. Any outbreak or threat of an outbreak of a contagions or epidemic disease could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its ability to finance, its business and financial results and the market price of its securities.

 

14. Forward Looking Statements

 

This MD&A contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding (i) planned exploration and development programs and expenditures; (ii) the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (iii) expectations on the potential renewal of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema project; (iv) proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema project and the Camino Rojo project; (v) the potential for the discovery of additional mineral resources; (vi) Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits, required agreements with third parties and regulatory approvals, including but not limited to, the receipt of the Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (“ESIA”) permit related to the Cerro Quema project and other necessary permitting required to implement expected future exploration plans; (vii) community and ejido relations; (viii) requirements for additional land; (ix) availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; (x) results of feasibility studies, including but not limited to mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plans and operations, internal rates of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present values, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; (xi) upside opportunities such as pit wall angles, land agreements, and the development of the sulphide mineral resource, and exploration potential; (xii) the timing and costs for production decisions; (xiii) financing timelines and requirements, including the timing and the amount to be secured relating to the Camino Rojo project loan; (xiv) the Camino Rojo project loan, including meeting all the conditions precendent relating to tranches 2 and 3 of the project loan; (xv) timing for start of engineering work, construction, and receipt of permits; (xvi) changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; (xvii) currency and interest rate fluctuations; (xviii) timing for first gold production; and (xix) the Company's objectives and strategies.

 

Page 24

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, (i) the future price of gold; (ii) anticipated costs and the Company’s ability to fund its programs; (iii) the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities; (iv) the Company’s ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements; (v) the timing and results of drilling programs; (vi) the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Company’s mineral properties; (vii) the obtaining of an agreement with the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein) to develop the entire Camino Rojo Gold Project mineral resource estimate; (viii) the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects; (ix) the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, (x) assumptions regarding the ability to meet the conditions precedent regarding drawdown on the the Camino Rojo project loan; (xi) the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; (xii) that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; (xiii) that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; (xiv) that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; (xv) that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties; (xvi) the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner; and (xvii) the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements include, among others: (i) failing to meet certain conditions precedent to draw the reamining portion of the Camino Rojo project loan; (ii) risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, including changes in economic parameters; (iii) risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; (iv) failure to obtain required regulatory and stock exchange approvals with respect to any Offering; (v) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (vi) delays in or failure to obtain an agreement with the Adjacent Owner with respect to the Camino Rojo Gold Project; (vii) health, safety and environmental risks; (viii) success of exploration, development and operations activities; (ix) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (x) delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (xi) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (xii) uncertainty in estimates of production, capital and operation costs and potential for production and cost overruns; (xiii) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (xiv) the fluctuating price of gold; (xv) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xvi) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; (xvii) competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of mineral reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; and (xviii) the Company’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions.

 

Page 25

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risks and Uncertainties” in this MD&A for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this MD&A and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. You are urged to read the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which you can view online under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com

 

Page 26

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

15. Abbreviations Used

 

$ Canadian dollars
AIF Annual Information Form
AISC All in Sustaining Cost
Ag Silver
Au Gold
Canplats Canplats Resources Corporation
Cerro Quema
Report
or
2014 PFS
An independent technical report for the Cerro Quema Project entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”) prepared by Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA.  
CIM Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Company Orla Mining Ltd.
CSR Community and Social Responsibility
EPCM Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management
ESIA Estudio de Impacto Ambiental, a Panamanian environmental impact study
g/t Grams per metric tonne
G&A General and administrative costs
GAAP Generally accepted accounting principles, which for the Company are IFRS
Goldcorp Goldcorp Inc., a predecessor company to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, prior to April 18, 2019.
MXN Mexican pesos
Newmont Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, a publicly traded company resulting from the combination of Newmont Mining Corporation and Goldcorp Inc., effective April 18, 2019.
ha Hectares
HGL HydroGeoLogica Inc.
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
IMC Independent Mining Consultants Inc.
IP Induced polarization
IRR Internal rate of return
K tonnes Thousands of metric tonnes
Koz Thousands of troy ounces
KCA Kappes Cassiday and Associates
LOM Life of mine
M&I Measured and indicated
MD&A Management's Discussion and Analysis
MIA Manifiesto de Impacto Ambiental.  In English, an Environmental Impact Statement

 

Page 27

 

 

NI 43-101 Canadian National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects”
NPV Net present value
Pb Lead
PFS Pre-Feasibility Study
RC Reverse circulation
RGI Resource Geosciences Incorporated
SEDAR The System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval, a filing system operated by the Canadian Securities Administrators, accessible at: www.sedar.com
SEMARNAT Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.  In English, the Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (Mexico)
t Metric tonne, equal to 1,000 kilograms (approximately 2,205 pounds)
TSX Toronto Stock Exchange
US$ United States dollars
Zn Zinc

 

Page 28

 

 

Exhibit 99.35

 

Form 52-109F1

Certification of Annual Filings
Full Certificate

 

I, Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer of Orla Mining Ltd., certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended December 31, 2019.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

1

 

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: N/A

 

6. Evaluation: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have

 

(a) evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

 

(b) evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A

 

(i) our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

 

(ii) N/A

 

7. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on October 1, 2019 and ended on December 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

8. Reporting to the issuer’s auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer’s auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date: March 23, 2020.

 

“Etienne Morin”  

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

2

 

 

Exhibit 99.36

 

 

Annual Information Form

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

March 23, 2020

 

 
 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

INTRODUCTORY NOTES AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS

3
CORPORATE STRUCTURE 8
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS 9
DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS 14
MINERAL PROJECTS 21
RISK FACTORS 64
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE 75
DIVIDENDS 76
MARKET FOR SECURITIES 77
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 77
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS 80
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS 80
TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS 81
MATERIAL CONTRACTS 81
INTERESTS OF EXPERTS 81
AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION 82
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 84
SCHEDULE “A” 85

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

INTRODUCTORY NOTES AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS

 

GENERAL

 

In this Annual Information Form (“AIF”), Orla Mining Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, as the context requires, is referred to as the “Company” and “Orla”. Unless otherwise stated, all information contained in this AIF is as at December 31, 2019, being the date of the Company’s most recently completed financial year.

 

This AIF should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis for the financial year ended December 31, 2019, which are available under the Company’s profile on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) website at www.sedar.com.

 

CURRENCY PRESENTATION AND EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION

 

This AIF contains references to Canadian (“$” or “C$”) and United States dollars (“US dollars” or “US$”). All dollar amounts referenced, unless otherwise indicated, are expressed in Canadian dollars. Unless otherwise indicated, United States dollar amounts have been converted to Canadian dollars at the indicative exchange rate on December 31, 2019, as quoted by the Bank of Canada, of US$0.7699 = C$1.00.

 

GOLD PRICES

 

The high, low, average, and closing London PM fix gold (“gold” or “Au”) prices in United States dollars per troy ounce for each of the three years preceding the period ended December 31, 2019, as quoted by the London Bullion Market Association, were as follows:

 

      Year Ended December 31  
    2019       2018       2017  
High   US$ 1,546     US$ 1,355     US$ 1,346  
Low   US$ 1,270     US$ 1,178     US$ 1,151  
Average   US$ 1,393     US$ 1,268     US$ 1,257  
Closing   US$ 1,515     US$ 1,282     US$ 1,291  

 

SILVER PRICES

 

The high, low, average, and closing London fix silver (“silver” or “Ag”) prices in United States dollars per troy ounce for each of the three years preceding the period ended December 31, 2019, as quoted by the London Bullion Market Association, were as follows:

 

      Year Ended December 31  
    2019       2018       2017  
High   US$ 19.31     US$ 17.52     US$ 18.56  
Low   US$ 14.38     US$ 13.97     US$ 15.22  
Average   US$ 16.21     US$ 15.71     US$ 17.05  
Closing   US$ 18.05     US$ 15.47     US$ 16.87  

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This AIF contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements are included to provide information about management’s current expectations and plans that allows investors and others to get a better understanding of the Company’s operating environment, the business operations and financial performance and condition.

 

Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding planned exploration and development programs and expenditures, the estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (each as defined herein), expectations on the potential extension of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema Project (as defined herein); proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema Project and the Camino Rojo Project (as defined herein); Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits, required agreements with third parties and regulatory approvals required in connection with mining and mineral processing operations, including but not limited to, necessary permitting required to implement expected future exploration plans; community and ejido relations; availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; competition for, among other things, acquisitions of mineral reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; currency and interest rate fluctuations and the ability to secure the required capital to conduct planned exploration programs, studies and construction. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the future price of gold, anticipated costs and the Company’s ability to fund its programs, the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities, the Company’s ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements, the timing and results of drilling programs, the discovery of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves on the Company’s mineral properties, the obtaining of an agreement with the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein) to develop the entire Camino Rojo Project Mineral Resource estimate, the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects, the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner and the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others: (i) access to additional capital; (ii) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves; (iii) delays in or failures to enter into an agreement with the Adjacent Owner with respect to the Camino Rojo Project; (iv) health, safety and environmental risks; (v) success of exploration, development and operation activities; (vi) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (vii) delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (viii) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (ix) uncertainty in estimates of production, capital and operating costs and potential of production and cost overruns; (x) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (xi) the fluctuating price of gold and silver; (xii) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xiii) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; (xiv) the Company’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions; and (xv) volatility in the market price of Company's securities.

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” below for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this AIF and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. Investors are urged to read the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which can be viewed online under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

Investors are cautioned that all of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s Mineral Resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by another mining company (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the Mineral Resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner. Delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement would affect the development of a significant portion of the Mineral Resources of the Camino Rojo property that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. There can be no assurance that Orla will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to Orla or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. However, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in Orla’s Feasibility Study dated June 25, 2019.

 

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION

 

Unless otherwise indicated, scientific and technical information in this AIF relating to the Company’s mineral properties has been reviewed and approved by Hans Smit, P.Geo., the former Chief Operating Officer and a former director of the Company (“Director”). Mr. Smit is a “Qualified Person” as defined under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”).

 

The disclosure included in this AIF uses Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources classification terms that comply with reporting standards in Canada and the Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimations are made in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards on Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources adopted by the CIM Council on May 10, 2014 and NI 43-101. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators that establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. The following definitions are reproduced from the CIM Standards:

 

A “Mineral Resource” is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated, or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling. Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories.


Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

An “Inferred Mineral Resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated based on limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that most of the Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.

 

An “Indicated Mineral Resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of Modifying Factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from adequately detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to assume geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource and may only be converted to a Probable Mineral Reserve.

 

A “Measured Mineral Resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of Modifying Factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to confirm geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. A Measured Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than that applying to either an Indicated Mineral Resource or an Inferred Mineral Resource. It may be converted to a Proven Mineral Reserve or to a Probable Mineral Reserve.

 

A “Mineral Reserve” is the economically mineable part of a Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when the material is mined or extracted and is defined by studies at Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility level as appropriate that include application of Modifying Factors. Such studies demonstrate that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified. The reference point at which Mineral Reserves are defined, usually the point where the ore is delivered to the processing plant, must be stated. It is important that, in all situations where the reference point is different, such as for a saleable product, a clarifying statement is included to ensure that the reader is fully informed as to what is being reported. Mineral Reserves are sub-divided in order of increasing confidence into Probable Mineral Reserves and Proven Mineral Reserves. The public disclosure of a Mineral Reserve must be demonstrated by a Pre-Feasibility Study or Feasibility Study.

 

A “Probable Mineral Reserve” is the economically mineable part of an Indicated, and in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource. The confidence in the Modifying Factors applying to a Probable Mineral Reserve is lower than that applying to a Proven Mineral Reserve. Probable Mineral Reserve estimates must be demonstrated to be economic, at the time of reporting, by at least a Pre-Feasibility Study.

 

A “Proven Mineral Reserve” is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource. A Proven Mineral Reserve implies a high degree of confidence in the Modifying Factors. Proven Mineral Reserve estimates must be demonstrated to be economic, at the time of reporting, by at least a Pre-Feasibility Study.

 

“Modifying Factors” are considerations used to convert Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves. These include, but are not restricted to, mining, processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social, and governmental factors.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO UNITED STATES INVESTORS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MEASURED, INDICATED, AND INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES

 

This AIF has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of United States securities laws and uses terms that are not recognized by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Canadian reporting requirements for disclosure of mineral properties are governed by the Canadian Securities Administrators’ NI 43-101. The definitions used in NI 43-101 are incorporated by reference from the CIM Standards. United States reporting requirements are currently governed by the SEC Industry Guide 7 (“SEC Industry Guide 7”) under the Securities Act. These reporting standards have similar goals in terms of conveying an appropriate level of confidence in the disclosures being reported but embody different approaches and definitions. For example, the terms “Mineral Reserve,” “Proven Mineral Reserve” and “Probable Mineral Reserve” are Canadian mining terms as defined in NI 43-101, and these definitions differ from the definitions in SEC Industry Guide 7. Under SEC Industry Guide 7 standards, a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study is required to report reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority. Further, under SEC Industry Guide 7, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. Reserve estimates contained in this AIF may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC Industry Guide 7. Further, the SEC has not recognized the reporting of mineral deposits which do not meet the SEC Industry Guide 7 definition of “reserve” prior to the adoption of the Modernization of Property Disclosures for Mining Registrants, which rules will be required to be complied with in the first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2021.

 

While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. In addition, “Inferred Mineral Resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules and regulations, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies or other economic studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. Accordingly, information contained in this AIF containing descriptions of mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CORPORATE STRUCTURE

 

NAME, ADDRESS AND INCORPORATION

 

The Company was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) on May 31, 2007 as a Capital Pool Company (as defined by the TSX Venture Exchange (the “TSXV”)). On June 3, 2010, the Company was continued into British Columbia under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) and on April 21, 2015, the Company was continued into Ontario under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario). On June 12, 2015, the Company changed its name from “Red Mile Minerals Corp.” to “Orla Mining Ltd.” On December 2, 2016, in order to facilitate the acquisition of Pershimco Resources Inc. (“Pershimco”), the Company was continued as a federal company under the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “CBCA”). Following the continuance, on December 6, 2016, the plan of arrangement under the CBCA involving Orla and Pershimco (the “Arrangement”) was affected. Pursuant to the Arrangement, among other things, Orla and Pershimco were amalgamated and continued as one company under the name “Orla Mining Ltd.”

 

The Company’s registered office and its head and principal office is located at Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 2T5.

 

INTERCORPORATE RELATIONSHIPS

 

The following is a diagram of the intercorporate relationships among Orla and its material subsidiaries, including their respective jurisdictions of incorporation.

 

 

 

Inactive subsidiaries and those with both less than 10% of the total assets of the Company and 10% of the total revenues of the Company are excluded. As required under Mexican corporate law, Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV (“Minera Camino Rojo”) has two shareholders – Orla Mining Ltd. holds 98% of the shares and 2% are held by a Canadian subsidiary of the Company, which holds its shares in trust for the Company.

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS

 

OVERVIEW

 

Orla is a Canadian company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”). The Company's focus is on the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral exploration and exploitation opportunities in which the Company's exploration, development and operating expertise could substantially enhance shareholder value. The Company currently has two core projects – the Camino Rojo project in Zacatecas State, Mexico (the “Camino Rojo Project”) and the Cerro Quema project in Los Santos Province, Panama (the “Cerro Quema Project”).

 

The Camino Rojo Project is an advanced gold oxide heap leach project in a low risk jurisdiction, which leverages management’s and the Company’s Board of Directors’ (the “Board” or “Board of Directors”) extensive exploration, development, and operating experience in Mexico. The Camino Rojo Project boasts a large prospective land package covering over 163,000 hectares (“ha”). Access and infrastructure are excellent with a paved highway and powerline nearby. A NI 43-101 technical report dated June 25, 2019 containing current Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimations for the Camino Rojo Project and operating plan has been filed under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. For further details regarding the Camino Rojo Project, see “Mineral Projects – Camino Rojo Project”.

 

The Cerro Quema Project includes mineralized zones with the potential to support a near-term oxide gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project concession covers 14,800 ha and boasts paved road access, supportive local communities, and private land ownership. The Cerro Quema Project is currently in the last stage of the permitting process for a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. For further details regarding the Cerro Quema Project, see “Mineral Projects – Cerro Quema Project”.

 

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS

 

THREE YEAR HISTORY OF ORLA

 

Orla’s history prior to the appointment of management in June 2015 is not material to the current business of the Company.

 

Subsequent to the appointment of management in June 2015 and prior to the acquisition of Pershimco by Orla in December 2016, the principal activities of Orla included:

 

· On June 10, 2015, Orla announced that, at the annual and special shareholders meeting, the shareholders of the Company approved the name change from Red Mile Minerals Corp. to “Orla Mining Ltd.” The name change was effective on June 12, 2015 and at market open on June 12, 2015, the Company’s common shares (the “Old Orla Shares”) commenced trading on the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”) under the name “Orla Mining Ltd.” with the new trading symbol “OLA”.

 

· On July 8, 2016, Orla closed a non-brokered private placement financing for gross proceeds of C$7,000,000. The Company issued 14,000,000 units (each, a “2016 Unit”) at a price of C$0.50 per 2016 Unit. Each 2016 Unit consisted of one Old Orla Share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a “July 2021 Warrant”). Each July 2021 Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one Old Orla Share at an exercise price of C$0.62 until July 8, 2021. These July 2021 Warrants became exercisable for Common Shares (as defined below) in connection with the Arrangement, as discussed below. Insiders of the Company accounted for approximately 46% of the total financing. The Company used the net proceeds to further asset review and evaluation opportunities, and for general working capital purposes.

 

Page 9

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

THREE YEAR HISTORY OF PERSHIMCO

 

Prior to the acquisition of Pershimco by Orla in December 2016, the principal activities of Pershimco included:

 

· On January 28, 2014, Pershimco closed a non-brokered private placement with Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”) and Sentient Executive GP IV Limited (“Sentient”) for aggregate gross proceeds of C$11,198,692.

 

· In July 2014, Pershimco issued its prefeasibility study of the Cerro Quema Project, which was intended to help determine the value of the Mineral Reserves contained in the oxidized gold domain of the La Pava and Quemita deposits. This study considered the work conducted by previous owners, as well as the work completed since Pershimco acquired the property.

 

· On May 14, 2015, Pershimco completed a brokered private placement for aggregate gross proceeds of C$7,071,203. Agnico Eagle and Sentient participated, increasing each of their ownership percentages to 19.9% of the then outstanding common shares of Pershimco (the “Pershimco Shares”).

 

· On May 16, 2015, the Autoridad Nacional del Medio Ambiente (“ANAM”) of Panama successfully completed public hearings on the Cerro Quema Project. During the hearings, ANAM heard the views of local leaders and residents concerning the Cerro Quema Project’s potential environmental and social impact. The ANAM public consultations represented a major milestone for Pershimco in order to initiate the technical review and recommendations on the ESIA.

 

· On August 20, 2015, Pershimco completed a non-brokered private placement with EXP T1 Ltd., an affiliate of RK Mine Finance (“Red Kite”), for aggregate gross proceeds of C$3,266,000. The private placement was completed in connection with the arranging of a senior secured facility with Red Kite for US$15 million.

 

· In November 2015, Pershimco acquired all the issued and outstanding shares of Aurum Exploration Inc. (“Aurum”), a Panamanian company, from Bellhaven Copper and Gold Inc., for cash consideration of US$140,000. The acquisition of Aurum gave Orla rights to certain concession applications along the Azuero mineralized belt.

 

THE PERSHIMCO ACQUISITION

 

On September 14, 2016, Orla and Pershimco entered into a definitive arrangement agreement (the “Arrangement Agreement”) to amalgamate the two companies by way of a court-approved Arrangement under the CBCA. Concurrently with entering into the Arrangement Agreement, Orla subscribed for 12,121,212 Pershimco Shares at a price of C$0.33 per Pershimco Share in a private placement for total gross proceeds to Pershimco of approximately C$4 million, representing approximately 4% of the Pershimco Shares on a pro forma basis. The private placement financing was not conditional on the completion of the Arrangement.

 

Page 10 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

In connection with the proposed Arrangement, Orla entered into an agreement with GMP Securities L.P. on behalf of a syndicate of agents (the “Agents”) to complete a private placement of subscription receipts (the “Subscription Receipts”) for total gross proceeds of approximately C$50 million at a price of C$1.75 per Subscription Receipt. The gross proceeds were held in escrow in order to be released immediately prior to the completion of the Arrangement upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. Each Subscription Receipt entitled the holder thereof to one Old Orla Share on satisfaction of the release conditions, which Old Orla Shares would then participate in the Arrangement, as discussed below. Insiders of Orla participated in the financing and subscribed for an aggregate of 12,604,000 Subscription Receipts representing 44.1% of the outstanding Subscription Receipts sold under the private placement, and minority shareholder approval was obtained for the insider participation.

 

On December 6, 2016, Orla announced the completion of the Arrangement and the release of the proceeds of the private placement of Subscription Receipts from escrow. The proceeds were used to repay any amounts owed to Red Kite, for exploration at the Cerro Quema Project and for general corporate purposes.

 

Under the Arrangement, each Orla shareholder received one common share of the amalgamated Orla entity (the “Common Shares”) in exchange for each Old Orla Share held. Each Pershimco shareholder received (i) 0.19 of a Common Share for each Pershimco Share held; and (ii) 0.04 of a class A common share of Orla. Each whole class A common share entitled its holder to receive, without payment of additional consideration, one Common Share conditional upon the issuance of a ministerial resolution by the Ministry of Environment of Panama, accepting the ESIA for the Cerro Quema Project on or prior to January 31, 2017. All outstanding options and warrants of both Orla and Pershimco were exchanged for equivalent securities of Orla in accordance with the Arrangement, while the outstanding restricted share units of Pershimco were paid out in either cash or Common Shares.

 

Following completion of the Arrangement, Orla had approximately 115.86 million Common Shares issued and outstanding with approximately 53.1% of the Common Shares being held by former shareholders of Orla and 46.9% of the Common Shares being held by former shareholders of Pershimco. Additionally, Orla had approximately 11.44 million class A shares issued and outstanding, which were all held by former shareholders of Pershimco. The 12,121,212 Pershimco Shares held by Orla were cancelled in connection with the Arrangement.

 

On December 7, 2016, the post-arrangement Common Shares commenced trading on the TSXV under the symbol OLA.

 

DEVELOPMENTS SUBSEQUENT TO THE PERSHIMCO ACQUISITION

 

On February 2, 2017 Orla announced that the ESIA was not received prior to January 31, 2017 and, as a result and in accordance with their terms, any right held by the holders of class A common shares to receive Common Shares was terminated

 

On June 21, 2017, Orla announced it had entered into an asset purchase agreement dated June 20, 2017, as amended (the “Camino Agreement”) pursuant to which Orla would acquire the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc. (“Goldcorp”) for consideration to Goldcorp consisting of 31,860,141 Common Shares and a 2.0% net smelter royalty (the “Camino Acquisition”). On November 7, 2017, Orla and Goldcorp Inc. completed the Camino Acquisition. Following the Camino Acquisition, Goldcorp held 31,860,141 Common Shares, representing 19.9% of the then outstanding Common Shares.

 

In addition, Orla and Goldcorp entered into an option agreement dated November 7, 2017 (the “Option Agreement”) regarding the potential future development of a sulphide operation at the Camino Rojo Project whereby Goldcorp will, subject to the sulphide project meeting certain thresholds, have an option to acquire a 60% to 70% interest in such sulphide project at the Camino Rojo Project. Orla will be the operator of the Camino Rojo Project and will have full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. However, in the event sulphide projects are defined through one or more positive pre-feasibility studies outlining a development scenario as outlined below, Goldcorp will have an option to enter into a joint venture with Orla for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of such a sulphide project.

 

In connection with the issuance of the Common Shares by the Company to Goldcorp, the parties entered into an investor rights agreement (the “IRA”). The IRA provides that (i) Goldcorp will not sell any of the Common Shares for a period of two years from the closing date, except in certain circumstances; (ii) for so long as Goldcorp maintains at least a 10.0% equity interest in the Company, it will have the right to participate in future equity offerings used to advance the Cerro Quema or Camino Rojo projects, in order to maintain its pro rata ownership and (iii) Goldcorp will have the right to appoint one nominee to the Board of Directors.

 

DEVELOPMENTS DURING 2018

 

On January 25, 2018, Orla entered into an agreement to acquire up to a 100% interest in the Monitor Gold exploration project (the “Monitor Gold Project”) covering approximately 2,800 ha in central Nevada. The agreement is structured as a lease between the vendor, Mountain Gold Claims LLC (“Mountain Gold”), a privately held Nevada company, Orla, and Monitor Gold Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Orla. The agreement covers an initial 340 claims and is subject to a surrounding area of interest (the “AOI”) in which any additional mineral claims Orla acquires will become part of the lease and a right for Orla to acquire ownership of any claims required to develop a mining operation. Mountain Gold retains a 3% net smelter royalty covering the claims and any new claims in the AOI, with Orla having the right to purchase a portion of this royalty and a right of first refusal on the remaining portion. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Orla is required to make an advanced royalty payment of US$5,000 on execution of the agreement, and advanced royalty payments in the aggregate amount of US$525,000, as allocated per year in the agreement until the 10th anniversary date, and US$100,000 on the 11th anniversary date and each anniversary date thereafter. Orla has annual work commitments in the aggregate of US$155,000 for the first four years of the lease, and US$100,000 for the fifth year and each year thereafter. In addition, Orla will be required to make payments of US$50,000, US$150,000 and US$250,000, on each of the first, third and fifth anniversary dates, respectively, with such payments to be satisfied in cash or through the issuance of Common Shares, which shares will be issued at a price based on the closing price of the Common Shares on the date prior to the applicable anniversary date or such other price as may be required by the applicable stock exchange. On January 28, 2019, the Company issued 58,895 Common Shares at a deemed price of $1.10 per share to Mountain Gold in respect of the annual share consideration to be issued by the Company on the first anniversary. The Monitor Gold Project is not considered to be a material project for the Company.

 

Page 11 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

On February 15, 2018, Orla closed a bought deal financing with a syndicate of underwriters and issued 17,581,200 units (each, a “2018 Unit”) of Orla at a price of C$1.75 per 2018 Unit for gross proceeds of C$30,767,100 (the “2018 Offering”). Each 2018 Unit was comprised of one Common Share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a “February 2021 Warrant”), where each full February 2021 Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one Common Share at a price of C$2.35 until February 15, 2021. The 2018 Units were sold pursuant to an underwriting agreement between the Company and a syndicate of investment dealers led by GMP Securities L.P. The 2018 Units issued under the 2018 Offering were offered by way of short form prospectus in all the Provinces of Canada, other than Québec and sold elsewhere outside of Canada on a private placement basis. Goldcorp and Agnico Eagle each subscribed for such number of 2018 Units from the 2018 Offering as were necessary to maintain their ownership positions in Orla of approximately 19.9% and 9.9%, respectively. Orla utilized the net proceeds of the 2018 Offering for exploration and development activities at its Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema projects and for general corporate purposes.

 

On April 30, 2018, Mr. Etienne Morin was appointed as the new Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

 

On May 29, 2018, Orla announced the results of a positive preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) and a Mineral Resource estimate on the Camino Rojo Project. See “Mineral Projects – Camino Rojo Project”.

 

On November 1, 2018, the Common Shares commenced trading on the TSX and were delisted from trading on the TSXV.

 

On November 12, 2018, Mr. Jason Simpson assumed the role as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer upon the resignation of Mr. Marc Prefontaine. In addition to the role of President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Simpson was also appointed a Director of the Company.

 

DEVELOPMENTS DURING 2019

 

On March 11, 2019, the Company filed a short form base shelf prospectus (the “Base Shelf Prospectus”) with the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces and territories of Canada, except Quebec, which allows the Company to offer for sale and issue from time to time Common Shares, warrants to purchase Common Shares, subscription receipts, units and debt securities, or any combination thereof, having a total aggregate offering price for such securities, of up to $300,000,000 (or the equivalent thereof in other currencies) during the 25-month period that the Base Shelf Prospectus, including any amendments thereto, remains effective.

 

On April 18, 2019, Newmont Mining Corporation acquired all outstanding common shares of Goldcorp and the combined company became known as Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. Effective January 6, 2020, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation changed its name to Newmont Corporation (“Newmont”). By virtue of the takeover of Goldcorp by Newmont, Newmont assumed all rights and obligations of Goldcorp pursuant to all Goldcorp contracts with the Company. Where applicable, all future references in this AIF to Goldcorp have been changed to Newmont.

 

Page 12 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

On May 14, 2019, the Company announced an early warrant exercise incentive program (the “Incentive Program”) for its 6,737,500 outstanding and unlisted July 2021 Warrants having an exercise price of $0.62 and expiring on July 8, 2021. The Incentive Program was designed to encourage the early exercise of the 2021 Warrants during a 30-day early exercise period commencing June 13, 2019 and ending on July 12, 2019 (the “Incentive Period”). Pursuant to the Incentive Program, the holders of the July 2021 Warrants (the “Warrantholders”) were entitled to receive one full new warrant (the “Incentive Warrant”) upon the exercise of each July 2021 Warrant during the Incentive Period. Pursuant to the Incentive Program, 5,842,500 July 2021 Warrants were exercised, resulting in total gross proceeds to the Company of $3,622,350. The Incentive Program resulted in the Company issuing 5,842,500 Common Shares and 5,842,500 Incentive Warrants exercisable into one Common Share at a price of $1.65 for a period of three years expiring on June 12, 2022. Subsequent to the expiry of the Incentive Period, an additional 325,000 of the July 2021 Warrants were exercised by Warrantholders, leaving 570,000 of the July 2021 Warrants outstanding.

 

At the 2019 shareholder meeting, Elizabeth McGregor was elected as a Director of the Company, and Hans Smit ceased as a Director of the Company.

 

On June 25, Orla announced the results of its Positive Feasibility Study on the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project located in Zacatecas state, Mexico. Subsequently on August 6, 2019, an independent technical report titled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 (the “Camino Rojo Report”) was filed under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. See “Mineral Projects – Camino Rojo Project”.

 

The Company announced on September 9, 2019 that the Company has awarded the engineering, procurement and construction management (“EPCM”) contract for the Camino Rojo Project to M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation, a full service EPCM firm headquartered in Tucson, Arizona.

 

On December 18, 2019, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation and a syndicate of other lenders (which include Agnico Eagle, Pierre Lassonde and three Directors of the Company) (collectively, the “Lenders”) with respect to a secured project finance facility of up to US$125 million (the “Facility”) for the development of the Camino Rojo Project. The Facility is for a term of five years (ending December 18, 2024), bears interest at 8.8% per annum and is comprised of three tranches – an initial tranche of US$25 million (drawn down on December 18, 2019) and two subsequent tranches of US$50 million each which are available for drawdown upon satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the receipt of key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo Project. The Company can prepay the Facility, in full or in part, at any time during the term, without penalty, with cash flow from operations. The terms of the Facility require no mandatory hedging, production payments, offtake, streams or royalties. In connection with the closing of the Facility, on December 18, 2019, the Company issued an aggregate of 32.5 million share purchase warrants (the “2026 Warrants”) to the Lenders having an exercise price of $3.00 per Common Share for a period of seven years expiring on December 18, 2026. Concurrent with the closing of the Facility, the Board approved the start of construction spending at Camino Rojo (for immediate needs such as detailed engineering and the ordering of long lead items such as the crushing system) and the commencement of project construction (subject to receipt of all required permits).

 

The Company announced on December 18, 2019 that it has received notification from the Mexican federal government environmental department known as SEMARNAT, granting approval to the Change of Land Use Permit, being one of the two key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Hans Smit ceased as Chief Operating Officer of the Company on December 31, 2019. Mr. Smit remains with the Company as a consultant and continues to act as Qualified Person to the Company.

 

On October 18, 2019, the Company entered into an investor rights agreement with Agnico Eagle (the "Investor Rights Agreement") pursuant to which, among other things, a previous participation right agreement dated January 26, 2019 between Agnico Eagle and the Company was terminated and Agnico Eagle was granted, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the Investor Rights Agreement, certain rights, including the right to participate in certain equity offerings undertaken by the Company and the right to nominate one member to the Company’s Board of Directors (which Agnico Eagle has indicated that it has no present intention of exercising). The Investor Rights Agreement also provides for certain limited restrictions on the transfer of Common Shares held by Agnico Eagle. The Investor Rights Agreement is available for review under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

Page 13 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS

 

SUMMARY

 

As described above under “General Development of the Business”, the Company is a natural resource exploration and development company engaged in the business of acquisition and development of mineral properties whose current efforts are focused on its Camino Rojo Project and Cerro Quema Project. See “Mineral Projects – Camino Rojo Project” and “Mineral Projects – Cerro Quema Project”.

 

SPECIALIZED SKILL AND KNOWLEDGE

 

All aspects of the Company’s business require specialized skills and knowledge. Such skills and knowledge include the areas of geology, mining, metallurgy, environmental permitting, corporate social responsibility, finance, and accounting. Orla faces competition for qualified personnel with these specialized skills and knowledge, which may increase costs of operations or result in delays.

 

COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS

 

The mineral exploration and mining business is competitive. Competition is primarily for: (a) mineral properties that can be developed and operated economically; (b) technical experts that can find, develop and mine such mineral properties; (c) labour to operate the mineral properties; and (d) capital to finance development and operations.

 

The Company competes with other mining companies, some of which have greater financial resources and technical facilities, for the acquisition of mineral concessions, claims, leases, and other interests, to finance its activities and in the recruitment and retention of qualified employees. The ability of the Company to acquire and develop precious metal properties will depend not only on its ability to raise the necessary funding but also on its ability to select and acquire suitable prospects for precious metal development or metal exploration. See “Financing Risks” and “Competition” under “Risk Factors”.

 

HEALTH AND SAFETY

 

The Company is committed to the health and safety of its employees and strives to create and maintain a safe working environment by complying with all applicable health and safety laws, rules, and regulations. Orla acknowledges that there are safety risks associated with its business and, through proactive risk management, continuously aims to minimize and control these risks. The Company now has a Health and Safety department with full time personnel at both Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema Projects and continues to develop Health and Safety policy and procedures. For 2019, there were no lost time injuries reported.

 

In order to ensure consistent oversight and proactive risk management, the Board has established an Environmental, Sustainability, Health & Safety Committee (discussed below in this AIF under the section entitled “Key Policies and Committees”) to assist the Board in its oversight role with respect to environmental, sustainability, health and safety matters concerning the Company. The Environmental, Sustainability, Health & Safety Committee is responsible for, among other things, ensuring that the Company provides training, instruction, and equipment to its personnel so that they may carry out their work in a manner that is safe for them and their colleagues.

 

Page 14 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

EMPLOYEES

 

As at December 31, 2019, the Company had 68 employees, which includes employees located in Canada (5), Panama (30) and Mexico (33). In addition, there were 25 contractors working on the Camino Rojo Project.

 

No management functions of the Company are performed to any substantial degree by a person other than the Directors or executive officers of the Company.

 

BANKRUPTCY AND SIMILAR PROCEDURES

 

There have been no bankruptcy, receivership, or similar proceedings against the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or any voluntary bankruptcy, receivership, or similar proceedings by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, within the three most recently completed financial years or during or proposed for the current financial year.

 

FOREIGN OPERATIONS

 

The locations of the Company’s Camino Rojo Project in Mexico and Cerro Quema Project in Panama expose the Company to certain risks, including currency fluctuations and possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mining titles or other mineral rights and opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations. Mineral exploration and mining activities in foreign jurisdictions may also be affected in varying degrees by political stability and governmental regulations relating to the mining industry; labour unrest; expropriation; renegotiation or termination of existing concessions; ability of governments to unilaterally alter agreements; surface land access; illegal mining; changes in taxation policies or laws; and repatriation of funds. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes in such foreign countries are beyond the Company’s control and may adversely affect the Company’s business.

 

See “Risk Factors – Foreign Country and Political Risk”.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

 

Mining, exploration, and development activities are subject to various levels of federal, provincial, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment at all phases of operation. These regulations govern exploration, development, tenure, production, taxes, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection and remediation of the environment, reclamation, mine safety, toxic substances, and other matters. These regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards and land reclamation. They also set forth limitations on the general handling, transportation, storage, and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors, and employees. To the best knowledge of the Company, it is in compliance with all environmental laws and regulations in effect where its properties are located. Environmental protection requirements did not have a material effect on the capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position of Orla during the 2019 financial year and are not expected to have a material effect during the 2020 financial year.

 

As noted above, the Board has established an Environmental, Sustainability, Health & Safety Committee which is responsible for all technical matters particularly as they apply to environmental, sustainability, health and safety concerns, assessing environmental risks and the Company’s risk management thereof.

 

The Company strives to actively engage and make positive contributions in the communities where it currently operates. In Panama, the Company has an active community relations program that includes provision of hot lunches to 5 to 15 year-old children studying in the 18 schools located within a 15 kilometre (“km”) radius of the Cerro Quema Project site, support for various local amateur sports teams, support for a youth orchestra in the town of Tonosi, Los Santos province, Panama, support for local fairs and cultural events, and support for specific local initiatives including the construction of a seniors’ centre in Tonosi.

 

Page 15 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Through agreements signed with the ejidos of San Tiburcio, El Berrendo and San Francisco de los Quijano, the Company provides social support, scholarships, and food to the local communities. The Company also has a significant community and social relations (“CSR”) program in addition to the requirements under the ejido agreements. The Company has a full-time community relations team for the Camino Rojo Project. The Company has contracted an independent consulting company to evaluate the CSR program and advise on its continued development.

 

KEY POLICIES AND COMMITTEES

 

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

 

The Board expects management to operate the business of the Company in a manner that enhances shareholder value and is consistent with the highest level of integrity. Management is expected to execute the Company’s business plan and to meet performance goals and objectives according to the highest ethical standards. To this end, the Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) for its Directors, officers, and employees. The Code also addresses such important topics as diversity and workplace bullying and harassment and states that the Company is committed to fostering a work environment of mutual respect and tolerance for diversity and will not tolerate and is dedicated to preventing bullying and harassment of any kind. Employees are required to report any violations under the Code or the Company’s corporate governance policies in accordance with the Company’s internal Whistleblower Policy (a copy of which is attached to the Code), which provides that an individual may report any concerns or complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, audit-related matters, or fraud to the Chair of the Audit Committee. Such concerns and/or complaints will be kept confidential and may be communicated anonymously if desired. Following the receipt of any complaints, the Chair of the Audit Committee shall promptly investigate each matter so reported. No complaints were received under the Whistleblower Policy in 2019. A copy of the Code is posted on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE POLICY

 

The Company has adopted a Corporate Disclosure Policy to outline the required process for the timely disclosure of all material information relating to the Company’s business, including both written and verbal disclosure, and to provide guidance and assistance to the Board of Directors, officers and employees in complying with their obligations under the provisions of securities laws and stock exchange rules to preserve the confidentiality of the Company’s non-public material information.

 

INSIDER TRADING POLICY

 

The Company has adopted an Insider Trading Policy. Canadian securities laws and regulations prohibit “insider trading” and impose restrictions on trading securities while in possession of material undisclosed information. The rules and procedures detailed in the Company’s Insider Trading Policy have been implemented in order to prevent improper trading of the Company’s securities or of companies with which the Company may have a business relationship.

 

SHARE OWNERSHIP POLICY

 

The Company has adopted a Share Ownership Policy in order to align the interests of the officers and Directors of the Company with those of the Company’s shareholders by requiring such persons to own a significant number of Common Shares. Each of the non-executive Directors is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least three times the value of the annual base retainer. Each of the executive officers is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least two times his or her base salary. The ownership guidelines will be deemed to be satisfied following the date on which the price paid by the Director or officer for Common Shares or the fair market value of the Common Shares equals or exceeds the ownership threshold. Individuals are required to comply with this policy by the fifth anniversary of the date of the individual’s date of hire or appointment.

 

Page 16 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CLAWBACK POLICY

 

The Company has adopted a Clawback Policy in order to maintain a culture of focused, diligent, and responsible management which discourages conduct detrimental to the growth of the Company and to ensure that incentive-based compensation paid by the Company is based upon accurate financial data. The Clawback Policy applies in the event of a material restatement of the Company’s financial results as a result of material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements.

 

ANTI-HEDGING POLICY

 

The Company has adopted a formal Anti-Hedging Policy, the objective of which is to prohibit those subject to it from directly or indirectly engaging in hedging against future declines in the market value of any securities of the Company through the purchase of financial instruments designed to offset such risk. The Board believes that it is inappropriate for Directors, officers or employees of the Company or its respective subsidiary entities or, to the extent practicable, any other person (or their associates) in a special relationship with the Company, to hedge or monetize transactions to lock in the value of holdings in the securities of the Company. Such transactions, while allowing the holder to own the Company’s securities without the full risks and rewards of ownership, potentially separate the holder’s interests from those of other stakeholders and, particularly in the case of equity securities, from the public shareholders of the Company.

 

MAJORITY VOTING POLICY

 

The Company has adopted a Majority Voting Policy prepared in accordance with TSX majority voting requirements with respect to the annual election of Directors.

 

DIVERSITY POLICY

 

The Company is committed to creating and maintaining a culture of workplace diversity. In keeping with this commitment, the Company has established a Diversity Policy. “Diversity” is any dimension which can be used to differentiate groups and people from one another, and it means the respect for and appreciation of the differences in gender, age, ethnic origin, religion, education, sexual orientation, political belief, or disability, amongst other things. The Company recognizes the benefits arising from employee and Board diversity, including a broader pool of high-quality employees, improving employee retention, accessing different perspectives and ideas, and benefiting from all available talent. The Company respects and values the perspectives, experiences, cultures, and differences that employees possess.

 

In accordance with the Diversity Policy, the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee will strive for inclusion of diverse groups, knowledge and viewpoints on the Board and in executive officer positions. In conjunction with its consideration of the qualifications and experience of potential directors and executive officers, as well as the skills, expertise, experience and independence which the Board requires to be effective, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the level of diversity (including the representation of (i) women, (ii) Indigenous peoples, (iii) persons with disabilities or (iv) members of visible minorities (collectively, “members of designated groups”)) on the Board when identifying and nominating candidates for election or re-election to the Board, and will consider the level of diversity (including the representation of members of designated groups) in executive officer positions when the Board makes executive officer appointments. The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee will be responsible for recommending qualified persons for Board nominations and in doing so, it will consider the benefits of all aspects of diversity on the Board and develop recruitment protocols that seek to include diverse candidates, including proactively searching for diverse candidates in the recruitment process.

 

Page 17 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Policies Regarding the Representation of Members of Designated Groups on the Board

 

As noted above, the Company has established a Diversity Policy, which sets out guidelines by which the Company will endeavour to promote, foster and support diversity, such as gender diversity, throughout the Company, including at the Board level, and applies to executive and non-executive directors, full-time, part-time and casual employees, contractors, consultants and advisors of Orla. Along with the adoption of the Diversity Policy, the Board also adopted guidelines by which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is to consider the diversity of the Board in its recommendations to the Board of nominees for election to the Board and long term plan for Board composition. The Board will proactively monitor Company performance in meeting the standards outlined in the Diversity Policy. This will include an annual review of any diversity initiatives established by Management and the Board, and progress in achieving them. All directors and senior executive officers are required to acknowledge that they have read the Diversity Policy annually.

 

Consideration of the Representation of Members of Designated Groups in the Director Identification and Selection Process

 

Pursuant to the Diversity Policy, the Board will consider diversity, such as members of designated groups, in the selection criteria of new Board members. The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee will also consider the following with respect to recommending nominees for election to the Board:

 

· competencies and skills each nominee will bring to the Board;
· past business experience;
· integrity;
· industry knowledge;
· ability to contribute to the success of the Company;
· past experience as directors or management with potential candidates;
· expected contribution to achieving an overall Board which can function as a high-performance team with sound judgment and proven leadership;
· whether the nominee can devote sufficient time and resources to his or her duties as a Board member; and
· any other factors as may be considered appropriate.

 

Consideration Given to the Representation of Members of Designated Groups in Executive Officer Appointments

 

Pursuant to the Diversity Policy, the Board will consider diversity, such as members of designated groups, in the selection criteria of new senior executive officer appointments. Management is responsible for recruiting and fostering a diverse and inclusive culture. Management will promote a work environment that values and utilizes the contributions of women and men and of members of designated groups equally, with a variety of backgrounds, experiences and perspectives through awareness of the benefits of workforce diversity and successful management of diversity.

 

Targets and Representation of Members of Designated Groups on the Board and in Executive Officer Positions

 

The Company has not established targets regarding the representation of members of designated groups on the Board or executive officer positions at this time. The Company believes that specific targets would be arbitrary and continues to favour recruitment and promotion based on abilities and contributions in accordance with the Diversity Policy.

 

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICY

 

The Company is always committed to conducting its business in a responsible manner. In keeping with this commitment, Orla has implemented a Corporate Social Responsibility Policy which sets out the guidelines by which the Company will (i) endeavour to respect the health and safety of its employees, (ii) protect the environment, (iii) respect the human rights of its employees and the residents in the communities in which the Company operates and (iv) contribute to the sustainable development of those communities.

 

Page 18 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

ENVIRONMENTAL, SUSTAINABILITY, HEALTH & SAFETY POLICY

 

The Company is committed to meeting or surpassing regulatory requirements in all its exploration and development activities while working to protect the environment both within and beyond the Company’s operational boundaries. In keeping with this commitment, Orla has adopted an Environmental, Sustainability, Health & Safety Policy. The Company will conduct all its operations in a manner that ensures full compliance with its Environmental, Sustainability, Health & Safety Policy, applicable legislation, and government requirements. The aim of this policy is to protect the surroundings in which the Company operates, to minimize and manage environmental risks and to enhance sustainable environmental practices. Orla will ensure that all its activities are conducted in an environmentally safe and responsible manner and will ensure that its contractors adhere to the same high environmental standards.

 

MANDATE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The Board discharges its responsibility for overseeing the management of the Company’s business by delegating to the Company’s senior officers the responsibility for day-to-day management of the Company. The Board discharges its responsibilities both directly and through its standing committees; namely, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Environmental, Sustainability, Health & Safety Committee and the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee. In order to clearly define its primary roles and responsibilities, the Board has adopted a Mandate of the Board of Directors.

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

The primary functions of the Company’s Audit Committee are to provide independent review and oversight of the Company’s financial reporting process, the system of internal control and management of financial risks, and the audit process, including the selection, oversight, and compensation of the Company’s external auditors. The Audit Committee also assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities in reviewing the Company’s process for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and its own Code. For further information, please refer to the section below in this AIF entitled “AUDIT COMMITTEE”.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL, SUSTAINABILITY, HEALTH & SAFETY COMMITTEE

 

The purpose of the Environmental, Sustainability, Health & Safety Committee is to monitor and review the health, safety, environmental and sustainable development policies, principles, practices, and processes of the Company and monitor and review the regulatory issues related to health, safety, the environment, and sustainable development. The Environmental, Sustainability, Health & Safety Committee has the authority to engage independent counsel or other experts and conduct any investigation that it considers appropriate. It is responsible for amongst other things, reviewing and approving annual disclosure relating to the Company’s sustainability, health, safety and environment policies and activities, reviewing sustainability, environmental and health and safety reports and identifying the principal health, safety and environmental risks and impacts of the Company.

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

 

The Compensation Committee has adopted a written mandate and is responsible for the review and approval of the philosophy and design of the Company’s compensation programs and the compensation of the Company’s executives and members of the Board and for submitting recommendations to the Board in this regard. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board, as appropriate, in connection with the Company’s succession planning with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executive officers and ensuring that the structure, design and application of the Company’s material compensation programs meet the Company’s principles, objectives and risk profile and do not encourage excessive risk taking.

 

Page 19 

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE

 

The Company’s Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee is in place to provide a focus on governance that will enhance the Company’s performance, to assess and make recommendations regarding the Board of Directors effectiveness and to establish and lead the process for identifying, recruiting, appointing, re-appointing, evaluating, and providing ongoing development for Directors.

 

The mandates/terms of reference for each of the Board, Environmental, Sustainability, Health & Safety Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee as well as the Code and all of the aforementioned policies are available on the Company’s website at www.orlamining.com. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is attached to this AIF as Schedule “A”.

 

REORGANIZATIONS

 

Other than the Arrangement, there have been no material reorganizations of the Company or any of its subsidiaries within the three most recently completed financial years or during or proposed for the current financial year.

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

MINERAL PROJECTS

 

THE CAMINO ROJO PROJECT

 

The following disclosure relating to the Camino Rojo Project has been derived, in part, from the Camino Rojo Report for the Camino Rojo Project, prepared by Carl E. Defilippi, RM, SME of Kappes, Cassiday and Associates (“KCA”), Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. of Resource Geosciences Incorporated (“RGI”), Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM of Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. (“IMC”) and David Hawkins, C.P.G. of Barranca Group, LLC. The Camino Rojo Report is available for review under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

PROJECT DESCRIPTION, LOCATION AND ACCESS

 

The Camino Rojo Project is a gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit located in the Municipality of Mazapil, State of Zacatecas, Mexico near the village of San Tiburcio. The project lies 190 km northeast of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km south-southwest of the town of Concepcion del Oro, Zacatecas, and 54 km south-southeast of Newmont’s Peñasquito Mine. The Camino Rojo Project area is centered at approximately 244150E 2675900N UTM NAD27 Zone 14N.

 

Both Monterrey and Zacatecas have airports with regularly scheduled flights south to Mexico City or north to the USA. There are numerous gravel roads within the property linking the surrounding countryside with the two highways, Highways 54 and 62, which transect the property. In addition, there is a railway approximately 40 km east of San Tiburcio. There are very few locations within the property that are not readily accessible by four-wheel drive vehicles.

 

On the date of the Camino Rojo Report, the Camino Rojo property consisted of seven concessions held by Minera Camino Rojo S.A. de C.V. (“Minera Camino Rojo”), a subsidiary of Orla, covering in aggregate 163,127 ha, with one concession expiring in 2057 and the remaining seven expiring in 2058.

 

Pursuant to the agreement whereby Orla acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc. (“Goldcorp”, which was subsequently acquired and is wholly-owned by Newmont), Newmont has a 2% NSR on all metal production from the Camino Rojo Project, except for metals produced under the sulphide joint venture option stipulated in the Camino Agreement. A 0.5% royalty is also payable to the Mexican government as an Extraordinary Mining Duty, mandated by Federal law. A Special Mining Duty of 7.5% is also payable to the Mexican government on income derived from mineral production.

 

Orla is the operator of the Camino Rojo Project and has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. If a sulphide project is defined through a positive pre-feasibility study outlining one of the development scenarios A or B below, Newmont may, at its option, enter into a joint venture for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of the sulphide project.

 

Scenario A: A sulphide project where material from the Camino Rojo Project is processed using the existing infrastructure of the Peñasquito mine, mill and concentrator facilities. In such circumstances, the sulphide project would be operated by Newmont, who would earn a 70% interest in the sulphide project, with Orla owning 30%.

 

Scenario B: A standalone sulphide project with a mine plan containing at least 500 million tonnes of Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves using standalone facilities not associated with Peñasquito. Under this scenario, the sulphide project would be operated by Newmont, who would earn a 60% interest in the sulphide project, with Orla owning 40%.

 

Following exercise of its option, if Newmont elects to sell its portion of the sulphide project, in whole or in part, then Orla would retain a right of first refusal on the sale of the sulphide project. Orla will retain a right of first refusal on Newmont’s NSR, Newmont’s portion of the sulphide project, following the exercise of its option, and certain claims retained by Newmont.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Surface rights in the project area are owned by several Ejidos, which are Federally defined agrarian communities and private landowners. The land overlying the Mineral Resource at the Camino Rojo Project, is controlled by Orla under an agreement with the San Tiburcio Ejido, comprised of 400 voting members who collectively control 37,154 ha. Exploration work at the Camino Rojo Project has been carried out under the terms of surface access agreements negotiated with the San Tiburcio Ejido and two neighbouring Ejidos.

 

Camino Rojo SA de CV (then, a Goldcorp subsidiary) executed two agreements that are still current with the San Tiburcio Ejido that cover the Camino Rojo deposit. Camino Rojo SA de CV subsequently passed the rights and obligations of these agreements to Minera Peñasquito SA de CV (then, a Goldcorp subsidiary), who subsequently transferred the rights and obligations to Minera Camino Rojo. Another agreement to cover surface access for exploration was signed in 2018.

 

The three agreements currently in effect with Ejido San Tiburcio are:

 

i. Previous to Expropriation Occupation Agreement (“COPE”), executed on 26 February 2013 by and between Camino Rojo SA de CV, in its position of “occupant”, and Ejido San Tiburcio, as the owner, with regards to a surface of 2,497.30 ha. The rights and obligations of this agreement were passed to Minera Camino Rojo and the agreement stipulates that the Ejido expressly and voluntarily accepts the expropriation of Ejido lands by Minera Camino Rojo, in effect converting the Ejido land to fee simple private land titled to Minera Camino Rojo. In the event that the Federal agency responsible for the expropriation process, the Secretario de Desarollo Agrario Territorial y Urbano, denies the petition to cede the Ejido lands to Minera Camino Rojo, the agreement automatically converts to a 30-year temporary occupation agreement. Payment in full was made at the date of signing and no further payments are due. This agreement is valid and expires in 2043 and covers the area of the Mineral Resource discussed in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

ii. Temporary Occupation Agreement (“COT”), executed on October 30, 2018 by and between Minera Camino Rojo, in its position of occupant, and Ejido San Tiburcio, as owner, with regards to a surface of 5,850 ha (the “TOA”). This agreement allows Minera Camino Rojo to explore 5,850 ha of Ejido lands over a 5-year period. Payments of 10,000,000 Pesos on signing, 5,000,000 Pesos on December 15, 2019, 5,000,000 Pesos on December 15, 2020, and 5,000,000 Pesos on December 15, 2021 are required to maintain the agreement in force. The 10,000,000 Peso payment was made at the date of signing as was the payment due December 15, 2019

 

iii. Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement (“CSRA”), executed on February 26, 2013 by and between Camino Rojo SA de CV, in its position of “collaborator”, and Ejido San Tiburcio, as “beneficiary”, with regards to certain social contributions to be provided in favour of this last CSRA. The rights and obligations of this agreement were passed to Minera Camino Rojo and the agreement stipulates that Minera Camino Rojo will contribute 10,000,000 Pesos annually to the Ejido to be used to promote and execute diverse social and economic development programs to benefit the Ejido. Additionally, at its discretion, Minera Camino Rojo will provide support for adult education, career training, business development assistance, and cultural programs, and scholastic scholarships. The agreement expires when exploration or exploitation activities at the Camino Rojo Project end. Annual payments are due on the 29th of June each year. This agreement is valid and remains in effect until mine closure or project cancellation.

 

Minera Camino Rojo signed a COT with Ejido El Berrendo on March 4, 2019 that covers 2,631 ha for a five-year period expiring on February 24, 2024. This COT requires annual payments of 2,284,787 Pesos. None of the Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves discussed in the Camino Rojo Report, nor proposed infrastructure, is located on Ejido El Berrendo land.

 

Camino Rojo SA de CV executed a surface rights agreement dated December 22, 2014 that expired December 21, 2019, with the Ejido San Francisco de los Quijano, the rights and obligations of which were passed to Minera Camino Rojo. This agreement was a COT, allowing exploration activities on 7,666 ha. None of the Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves discussed in the Camino Rojo Report, nor proposed infrastructure is located on Ejido Francisco de los Quijano land. The Company has not initiated negotiations for a new agreement as exploration priorities for the land owned by the Ejido Francisco de los Quijano have not been decided.

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Minera Camino Rojo signed a COT with Ejido El Berrendo on March 4, 2019 that covers 2,631 ha for a five year period expiring on February 24, 2024. This COT requires annual payments of 2,284,787 Pesos, the next payment of which is due in early 2020. None of the Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves discussed in the Camino Rojo Report, nor proposed infrastructure, is located on Ejido El Berrendo land.

 

No environmental liabilities are apparent on the property. The property does not contain active or historic mines or prospects, there are no plant facilities present within the project area, nor are tailings piles present, and all exploration work has been carried out by Minera Camino Rojo and prior operators in accordance with Mexican environmental standards and regulations. Conditional upon continued compliance, permits for normal exploration activities are expected to be readily attainable.

 

Federal environmental authorities approved a Change of Land Use Permit for the Camino Rojo Project in December 2019.  This permit allows use of the land for industrial and mining activities and permits the required surface disturbances needed to construct and operate the proposed mine.  Receipt of the Change of Land Use permit minimizes the risk of a possible Federal designation of a protected biological-ecological reserve that could affect the project.  On June 24, 2014, SEMARNAT published a public notice in the Official Gazette of the Federation requesting public consultation and comments on the possible designation of an area known as “Zacatecas Semiarid Desert” as a Natural Protected Area (“ANP”).  If a designation of this ANP by the government includes the surface of the mining concession areas or immediately adjacent areas, this could limit the growth and continuity of the project.  However, since the time that the proposal to create this ANP was first published in the Official Gazette of the Federation, there has been no formal Federal movement on the proposal and  state and municipal governments affected by the Camino Rojo Project have formally expressed opposition to creation of an ANP in the area of the Camino Rojo Project.  The authors of the Camino Rojo Report believe that the permitting risk for the project is low, similar to that of any mining project of similar scope in North America. 

 

HISTORY

 

The mining concessions comprising the Camino Rojo property were originally staked to the benefit of Canplats de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of Canplats Resources Corporation (“Canplats”), in 2007. In 2010, Goldcorp acquired 100% of the concession rights from Canplats. Orla acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp in 2017 and Goldcorp was acquired by Newmont in 2019.

 

The Camino Rojo gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit was discovered in mid-2007, approximately 45 km southwest of Concepcion del Oro, and was originally entirely concealed beneath post-mineral cover in a broad, low relief alluvial valley adjacent to the western flank of the Sierra Madre Oriental. Mineralized road ballast, placed on a dirt road near San Tiburcio, Zacatecas, was traced to its source by geologists from La Cuesta International, working under contract to Canplats. A shallow pit excavated through a thin veneer of alluvium, located adjacent to a stock pond (“Represa”), was the discovery exposure of the deposit. Following a rapid program of surface pitting and trenching for geochemical samples, Canplats began concurrent programs of surface geophysics (resistivity and induced polarization “IP”) and reverse circulation (“RC”) drilling in late 2007, which continued into 2008.

 

The initial drilling was focused on a 450 metre (“m”) x 600 m gold in rock geochemical anomaly named the Represa zone. Core drilling began in 2008. The geophysical survey defined two principal areas of high chargeability: one centred on the Represa zone and another one km to the west named the Don Julio zone. The elevated chargeability zones were interpreted as large volumes of sulphide mineralized rocks. Drilling by Canplats, and later drilling by Goldcorp, confirmed the presence of extensive sulphide mineralization at depth in the Represa zone, and much lower quantities of sulphide minerals at Don Julio.

 

By August of 2008, Canplats drilled a total of 92 RC, and 30 diamond-core holes, for a total of 23,988 and 16,044 m respectively, mainly focused in the Represa zone. The surface access and permission to continue drilling were cancelled in early August 2008, by the Ejido of San Tiburcio, Zacatecas. Nevertheless, in November 2008, Canplats published a Mineral Resource estimate for the Represa zone, as discussed in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

In October 2009, Canplats publicly released a preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) on the project, which is historical in nature and is no longer current and should not be relied upon.

 

Canplats was acquired by Goldcorp in early 2010. Validation, infill, condemnation, and expansion drilling began in January 2011. By the end of 2015, a total of 279,788 m of new core drilling in 415 drill holes and 20,569 m of new RC drilling in 96 drill holes was completed in the Represa and Don Julio zones and immediate surroundings. An additional 31,286 m of shallow rotary air blast (“RAB”) -style, RC drilling in 306 drill holes was completed, with most of the RAB drilling testing other exploration targets within the concession. Airborne gravity, magnetic and transient electromagnetic (“TEM”) surveys were also carried out, the results of which are in the archives of Minera Camino Rojo. As of the end of 2015, a total of 295,832 m in 445 diamond core holes, 44,557 m in 188 RC drill holes, and 31,286 m of RAB drilling had been completed.

 

Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource tabulations for the Camino Rojo Project were publicly disclosed by Goldcorp as recently as June 2016. The Camino Rojo Report summarizes these tabulations, but as the Camino Rojo Report includes a new Mineral Resource estimate, the Goldcorp numbers are no longer considered relevant.

 

There has been no recorded mineral production from the Camino Rojo Project. Current Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates for the Camino Rojo Project are detailed below.

 

GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION, AND DEPOSIT TYPES

 

Regional, Local and Property Geology

 

The Camino Rojo Project deposit is located beneath a broad pediment of Tertiary and Quaternary alluvium along the boundary between the Mesa Central physiographic province and the Sierra Madre Oriental fold and thrust belt near the pre-Laramide continental-margin. Oldest rocks are Triassic metamorphic continental rocks overlain by Early to Middle Jurassic red beds. Upper Jurassic to Upper Cretaceous marine facies rocks overlie the red beds at a disconformity and comprise a package of shelf carbonate rocks comprising the Zuloaga to Cuesta del Cura Formations and the basin-filling flysch sediments of the Indidura and Caracol Formations. The deposit lies within the southern extent of the northwest striking San Tiburcio fault zone.

 

On the Camino Rojo Project, a gold-silver-zinc-lead deposit lies concealed below shallow (<1 m to 3 m) alluvial cover in a large pediment along the southwest border of the Sierra Madre Oriental. Small water storage pits and trenches expose a portion of the oxide deposit in the discovery area known as Represa zone. The Late Cretaceous Caracol Formation is the primary mineralization host, and at depth, the upper Indidura Formation is a minor mineralization host along the Caracol contact.

 

The gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit is situated above, and extends down into, a zone of feldspathic hornfels developed in the sedimentary strata, and variably mineralized dacitic dikes. The mineralized zones correspond to zones of sheeted sulfidic veins and veinlet networks, creating a bulk-mineable style of gold mineralization. Skarn mineralization has been encountered in the deeper portions of the system. The observed geologic and geochemical characteristics of the gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit at Camino Rojo are consistent with those of a distal oxidized gold skarn deposit. The metal suite and style of mineralization at Camino Rojo are similar to the intrusion-related deposits in the Caracol Formation and underlying carbonate rocks adjacent to the diatremes at the Peñasquito mine.

 

Mineralization styles in the region include polymetallic and copper-gold skarn and limestone manto (replacement) silver-lead-zinc sulphide ores in the Concepcion del Oro District, approximately 50 km north-northeast of the Camino Rojo Project, and gold-silver-lead-zinc mineralized igneous diatreme-breccia, and sulphide-sulosalt-carbonate veinlets and fracture filings in the Caracol Formation at Newmont’s Peñasquito mine.

 

Mineralized Zones

 

The Camino Rojo deposit comprises intrusive related, clastic sedimentary strata hosted polymetallic gold, silver, arsenic, zinc and lead mineralization.

 

Page 24

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Three stages of mineralization have been observed in the Camino Rojo deposit, and two types of high-grade mineralization. At hand specimen scale, mineralization is controlled by bedding and fractures. The sandy and silty beds of the turbidite sequences of the Caracol Formation are preferentially mineralized, with pyrite disseminations and semi-massive stringers hosted within them, presumably due to higher porosity and permeability relative to the enclosing shale beds. Basal layers of the turbiditic sandstone beds are often preferentially mineralized. Bedding discordant open space filling fractures and structurally controlled breccia zones host banded sulphide veins and sulphide matrix breccias. Some higher-grade vein and breccia zones are localized along the margins of dikes of intermediate composition. Mineralization has been observed in drill core over vertical intervals greater than 400 m, with mineralization occurring in a broad NE-SW trending elongate zone as much as 300 m wide and 700 m long.

 

Oxidation was observed to range from complete oxidation in the uppermost portions of the deposit, generally underlain or surrounded by a zone of mixed oxide and sulphide mineralization where oxidation is complete along fracture zones and within permeable strata, but lacking in the remainder of the rock, which then is generally underlain by a sulphide zone in which no oxidation is observed. Oxidation of the deposit is approximately 100%, generally extending from surface to depths of 100 m to 150 m and to depths of as much as 400 m along fracture zones. The underlying transitional zone of mixed oxide/sulphide extends over a vertical interval in excess of 100 m and is characterized by partial oxidation controlled by bedding and structures. The sandy layers of the turbiditic sequence are preferentially oxidized, creating a stratigraphically interlayered sequence of oxide and sulphide material at the centimetre (“cm”) scale, with oxidation along structures affecting all strata. The partial oxidation of the Caracol Formation preferentially oxidizes the mineralized strata thus incomplete oxidation in the transition zone may result in nearly complete oxidation of the gold bearing portion of the rock, thus the metallurgical characteristics of mixed oxide/sulphide may vary greatly, with some material exhibiting characteristics similar to oxide material.

 

Deposit Types

 

The observed geologic and geochemical characteristics of the gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit are consistent with those of a distal oxidized gold skarn deposit. The near surface portion of the Camino Rojo deposit has characteristics consistent with those of the distal skarn zone, transitional to epithermal mineralization, and overlies garnet bearing skarn mineralization encountered in the deeper portions of the system. Skarn deposits often exhibit predictable patterns of mineral zoning and metal zoning. Application of skarn zoning models to exploration allows for inferences about the possible lateral and depth extents of the mineralized system at the Camino Rojo deposit and can be used to guide further exploration drill programs.

 

EXPLORATION

 

The Camino Rojo Report summarizes exploration efforts by Orla through to June 25, 2019. See “Outlook/Future Plans” below for information on exploration activities subsequent to June 25, 2019.

 

Current exploration work at the Camino Rojo Project is being conducted under several permits that allow temporary disturbance of the land.

 

Orla has conducted reconnaissance geological evaluations of portions of its mining concessions. Exploration activities completed included: geologic mapping; rock chip and soil geochemical sampling; and IP geophysical surveys. As of the effective date of the Camino Rojo Report, 291.3 line-km of IP surveys had been completed in four separate grids over the known area of mineralization, over the proposed area of infrastructure development, and to the west and south of the resource area. All grids were designed with 400 m line separation and stations every 100 m. Dipole spacing was selected to search for features at depths greater than 100 to 200 m. Chargeability anomalies with some similarities to the Camino Rojo deposit were identified but had not been tested by the date of the report. A small orientation soil survey was conducted over the resource area and 66 soil samples were collected. Results from the survey indicate the geochemical “halo” over the deposit is tightly restricted to sub/outcrop. Anomalous gold (>0.2 grams per tonne “g/t”) is most closely associated with elevated arsenic (>100 ppm) and zinc (>300 ppm). A total of 944 rock chip samples were collected from throughout the mining concessions comprising the project. No significant rock chip gold anomalies were identified.

 

Page 25

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Regional exploration continues to field check interpreted targets, consisting of coincident historical geochemical, airborne geophysical and satellite imagery anomalies. Eight areas of alteration of sedimentary strata have been identified, and although no significant geochemical results have been returned from them to date, they are considered of interest as possible distal alteration zones to mineralized areas. The eight target areas are: 1) Hacheros, where Indidura Formation limestones and siltstones are bleached and highly fractured with Fe-oxides and carbonate veinlets along fractures; 2) Guanamero, which lies northeast of the Represa Zone, along the trend of mineralization, and hosts recrystallized limestones of the Cuesta del Cura Formation; 3) Chapala, located south of the Represa Zone, where bleached Caracol Formation and recrystallized Indidura Formation is exposed; 4) Pozo de San Juan, which hosts old mining prospects that expose traces of Ag-Pb-Zn mineralization in recrystallized limestones of the Cupido Formation; 5) Majoma, where a polymictic hydrothermal breccia and hematized Caracol Formation are observed; 6) La Lomita, defined by a zone of stockwork fractured and weakly brecciated and hematized Caracol Formation; 7) Puerto de Sigala, where recrystallization and local silicification of Cretaceous limestones is present; and 8) Las Miserias, a zone of structural intersections, cut by intermediate composition dikes, with jasperoid developed in Cretaceous limestones.

 

DRILLING

 

The drillhole database used for the Feasibility Study contains 911 drillholes and 370,566 m of drilling. This is one less Canplats core hole, one less Goldcorp RC hole, and 37 less Goldcorp core holes than the overall reported drilling. This is because some holes were drilled in areas away from the deposit area.

 

During 2007 and 2008 Canplats drilled 121 holes for 39,831m of drilling, about 11% of the drilling by metres. This was 92 RC holes and 29 core holes. Between 2011 and 2015 Goldcorp drilled 779 holes for 328,587 m of drilling. These were 95 RC holes, 306 RAB holes, and 378 core holes. The 2015 holes and some of the late 2014 holes were drilled for geotechnical investigations.

 

Orla drilling included in the resource estimate was conducted during 2018 and consisted of 6 RC holes for 803m of drilling and 5 core holes for 1,345 m of drilling, totalling 11 holes and 2,148 m of drilling.

 

The Camino Rojo Report concludes that the drilling and sampling procedures for the Camino Rojo drill samples are reasonable and adequate and there do not appear to be any drilling, sampling or recovery factors which would materially impact the reliability of the results that are included in the database used for the Mineral Resource Estimation.

 

Analytical work comparing various drilling campaigns and drilling types indicates potential down hole contamination in some of the wet Canplats RC drilling. The suspect sample intervals were not used for the resource modeling for the Camino Rojo Report. This impacted about 2,100 m, or about 5%, of the Canplats drilling.

 

In addition to the 11 holes used in the Mineral Resource model database, through the effective date of the Camino Rojo Report, Orla completed geotechnical, metallurgical, condemnation and water exploration and development drilling totalling 11,331 m, as summarized in the table below.

 

Page 26

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Non-Resource Drilling Completed by Orla, 2018 and 2019

 

Purpose   Drillhole Type   Total Number
of Holes
    Total (m)  
Clay Exploration   DDH     5       56.00  
Condemnation   RC     7       1,767.85  
Geotech Infrastructure Substrate   DDH     19       323.35  
Geotech/Condemnation   DDH     4       642.00  
Metallurgy   DDH     14       2,288.50  
Monitoring Wells   RC     3       197.41  
Water Exploration   RC     16       5,340.51  
Water Production   RC     2       715.60  
    Total     70       11,331.22  

 

SAMPLING, ANALYSIS, AND DATA VERIFICATION

 

Sampling and analysis were supervised by the geological staff of Canplats for 2007 and 2008 drilling and by Goldcorp for 2011 through 2014 drilling and by Orla for 2018 drilling.

 

ALS Chemex was the primary assay laboratory used for the routine assaying of surface and drill samples for both the Canplats, Goldcorp and Orla drilling/sampling programs. All the assays were done at the ALS Chemex laboratory in North Vancouver, British Columbia, certified under ISO 9001: 2000, and 2008, and accredited under ISO 17025:2005.

 

The Canplats samples were prepared for assaying at the ALS Chemex sample preparation laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico. Most of the Goldcorp samples were prepared at the ALS Chemex sample preparation laboratory in Zacatecas, Mexico. However, during 2013 and 2014 samples were also sent to the ALS Chihuahua facility and the ALS Guadalajara preparation lab as well as Zacatecas facility. Orla samples were prepared at the ALS Chemex facility in Zacatecas.

 

Upon receipt at the sample preparation labs the samples were dried, crushed in their entirety to >70% passing a two- millimetre (“mm”) screen. The crushed material was riffle split to extract an approximate 250-gram sub-sample that was pulverized to >85% passing 75 microns in a disc pulverizer. This sample preparation procedure is the standard ALS Chemex “PREP-31” procedure. Each of the 250-gram pulps were riffle split into two sealed paper sample envelopes, with one split air-shipped to the ALS Chemex assay facility in North Vancouver. The second split was returned to the property for storage. The same sample preparation procedure was used for core and RC chips. ALS Chemex is independent of each of Canplats, Goldcorp and Orla.

 

The core and RC samples collected by Canplats, Goldcorp and Orla, as well as the surface pit and trench samples collected by Canplats, were assayed with the same analytical methods and at the same laboratory, the ALS Chemex facility in North Vancouver, British Columbia. For gold, all were assayed using the Au-AA23 30-gram fire assay fusion, with Atomic Absorption finish. A total of 33 other elements were determined four-acid sample digestion followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (“ICP-AES”). This is ALS Chemex method code ME-ICP61. Over-limits for gold were automatically re-assayed with 30-gram fire assay fusion with gravimetric finish (method code Au-GRA21). Over-limits for silver, copper, lead, and zinc were automatically performed by four acid digestion of the sample followed by analysis by ICP-AES. This is ALS Chemex method code ME-OG62 for material grade samples. RAB-style RC samples from 2011 to 2014 were analyzed at ALS Chemex using method code ME-MS61m, which employs the same four-acid digestion, and a combination of Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (“ICP-AES”), mass-spectrometry, and cold-vapour Atomic Absorption to determine 48 elements plus mercury. Most of the RAB holes are peripheral to the main deposit area.

 

Page 27

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Camino Rojo Report concludes that the historical sample preparation, analysis, quality assurance/quality control (“QA/QC”) programs and sample security measures conducted by Canplats, Goldcorp and Orla, all as more fully described in the Camino Rojo Report, were reasonable and adequate to ensure the reliability of the drilling database and that the respective QA/QC programs met or exceeded industry standards.

 

The sampling data used for the Mineral Resource in the Camino Rojo Report was verified by IMC. A substantial portion of the database was compared with original assay certificates. There were no limitations on the verification process and IMC concluded that the database assay values and the drill hole database are acceptable for the purposes of PEA, prefeasibility and feasibility level studies.

 

Rock samples from Orla’s recent exploration program are sent to the ALS Minerals (“ALS”) sample preparation facility in Zacatecas, Mexico. Sample analysis is performed in the ALS laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia. All gold results are obtained by ALS using fire assay fusion and an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish (Au-AA23). All samples are also analyzed for multi-elements, including silver and copper, using an Aqua Regia (ME-ICP41) digestion.

 

MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING

 

Historical metallurgical test work programs on the Camino Rojo property were commissioned by the prior operators of the project between 2010 and 2015. A confirmatory metallurgical test program was commissioned by Orla in 2018 to confirm the results and conclusions from the previous campaigns. In total, 107 column leach tests (85 on representative samples for the material types and pit area) and 164 bottle roll tests have been completed to date the date of the Camino Rojo Report on the Camino Rojo ore body as well as physical characterization and preliminary flotation test work.

 

Based on the metallurgical tests completed on the deposit, key design parameters for the project include:

 

· Crush size of 100% passing 38mm (P80 28mm);
· Estimated gold recoveries (including 2% field deduction) of:
· 70% for Kp Oxide;
· 56% for Ki Oxide;
· 60% for Trans-Hi; and
· 40% for Trans-Lo;
· Estimated silver recoveries (including 3% field deduction) of:
· 11% for Kp Oxide;
· 15% for Ki Oxide;
· 27% for Trans-Hi and
· 34% for Trans-Lo;
· Design leach cycle of 80 days;
· Agglomeration with cement not required for permeability or stability;
· Average cyanide consumption of 0.35 kg/t ore;
· Average lime consumption of 1.25 kg/t ore.

 

The key design parameters are based on a substantial number of metallurgical tests including 85 column leach tests on samples representative of domains in the current deposit model. These 85 representative samples from documented drill holes with good spatial distribution in the proposed pit include 41 columns tests on Kp Oxide material, 7 column tests on Ki Oxide material, 16 column tests on Trans-Hi material and 21 column tests on Trans-Lo material. The 22 non-representative columns were excluded based on the following criteria:

 

· Columns on Trans-S or sulphide material that were not considered in the Mineral Reserve.
· Mix of Tran-S or other material types.
· Samples taken from outside of the proposed pit area.

 

An additional 54 bottle roll leach tests with direct correlations with the column tests have been included as part of the evaluation to support these results and conclusions.

 

Page 28

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

In general, the Camino Rojo deposit shows variability in gold and silver recoveries based on material type and geological domain with preg-robbing organic carbon being the only significant deleterious element identified, which is primarily associated with the transition material at depth along the outer edges of the deposit. Recoveries for the oxide material are good and will yield acceptable results using conventional heap leaching methods with cyanide. Recoveries for the transition material are lower compared with the oxide material for conventional leaching with some areas of transition showing reasonably high recoveries. Reagent consumptions for all material types are reasonably low.

 

Preg robbing, a phenomenon where gold and gold-cyanide complexes are preferentially absorbed by carbonaceous, and to a lesser extent, other material within the orebody, presents a low risk to the overall project. A significant investigation by Orla into the preg robbing material indicates that potentially preg robbing material represents a small percentage of the total material to be processed and will not be encountered until later in the project life and can be mitigated by proper ore control.

 

MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES

 

The Mineral Resource in the Camino Rojo Report includes potential mill resources and the potential heap leach resources, which are oxide dominant and are the emphasis of the Camino Rojo Report. The Mineral Resources are based on a block model developed by IMC during January and February 2019.

 

Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 353.4 million tonnes at 0.83 g/t gold and 8.8 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 9.46 million ounces gold and 100.4 million ounces of silver for the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 60.9 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold and 7.4 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 1.70 million ounces of gold and 14.5 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource.

 

The gold and silver Mineral Resource includes material amenable to heap leach recovery methods (leach material) and material amenable to mill and flotation concentration methods (mill material). For the leach material, Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 94.6 million tonnes at 0.71 g/t gold and 12.7 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 2.16 million ounces gold and 38.8 million ounces of silver for the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 4.4 million tonnes at 0.86 g/t gold and 5.8 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 119,800 ounces of gold and 805,000 ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource amenable to heap leach methods. The resources amenable to heap leach methods are oxide dominant and are the emphasis of the Feasibility Study.

 

For the gold and silver resource in mill material, the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 258.8 million tonnes at 0.88 g/t gold and 7.4 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 7.30 million ounces gold and 61.6 million ounces of silver for the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 56.6 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold and 7.5 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 1.58 million ounces of gold and 13.7 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource in mill material.

 

The lead and zinc Mineral Resources are in sulphide dominant material and are recovered along with the gold and silver in the mill material. Lead and zinc Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 258.8 million tonnes at 0.07% lead and 0.26% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 413.6 million pounds of lead, and 1.50 billion pounds of zinc for the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 56.6 million tonnes at 0.05% lead and 0.23% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 63.1 million pounds of lead and 290.4 million pounds of zinc for the Inferred Mineral Resource category.

 

The Mineral Resources from the leach material are reported inclusive of those Mineral Resources that were converted to Mineral Reserves. The Mineral Resources from the mill material are excluded from the mine design in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

The Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resources reported below are constrained within a floating cone pit shell to demonstrate “reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction” to meet the definition of Mineral Resources in NI 43-101.

 

Page 29

 

 

  

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The below table presents a summary of the Mineral Resource at the Camino Rojo Project:

 

Mineral Resource – Gold and Silver

 

Mineral
Resource Type
  NSR
Cutoff
Grade
(US$/t)
    Kt     NSR
(US$/t)
    Gold
(g/t)
    Silver
(g/t)
    Gold (koz)     Silver (koz)  
Leach Resource:
Measured     4.73       19,391       23.14       0.77       14.9       482.3       9,305  
Indicated     4.73       75,249       18.52       0.70       12.2       1,680.7       29,471  
Total M&I:     4.73       94,640       19.47       0.71       12.7       2,163.0       38,776  
Inferred     4.73       4,355       18.42       0.86       5.8       119.8       805  
Mill Resource:
Measured     13.71       3,358       35.04       0.69       9.2       74.2       997  
Indicated     13.71       255,445       39.33       0.88       7.4       7,221.4       60,606  
Total M&I:     13.71       258,803       39.27       0.88       7.4       7,295.6       61,603  
Inferred     13.71       56,564       38.40       0.87       7.5       1,576.9       13,713  
Total Mineral Resource:
Measured             22,749       24.90       0.76       14.1       556.5       10,302  
Indicated             330,694       34.59       0.84       8.5       8,902.1       90,078  
Total M&I             353,443       33.97       0.83       8.8       9,458.6       100,379  
Inferred             60,919       36.98       0.87       7.4       1,696.7       14,518  

 

 

Mineral Resource – Lead and Zinc

 

Mineral Resource Type   NSR Cutoff Grade (US$/t)     Kt     NSR
(US$/t)
    Lead (%)     Zinc (%)     Lead (mlb)     Zinc (mlb)  
Mill Resource:
Measured     13.71       3,358       35.04       0.13       0.38       9.3       28.2  
Indicated     13.71       255,445       39.33       0.07       0.26       404.3       1,468.7  
Total M&I:     13.71       258,803       39.27       0.07       0.26       413.6       1,496.8  
Inferred     13.71       56,564       38.4       0.05       0.23       63.1       290.4  

 

Notes:

 

(1) The Mineral Resource is effective as of June 7, 2019.
(2) All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and therefore numbers may not appear to add precisely. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding.
(3) Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
(4) Mineral Resources for leach material are based on prices of US$1,400/oz gold and US$20/oz silver.
(5) Mineral Resources for mill material are based on prices of US$1,400/oz gold, US$20/oz silver, US$1.05/lb lead, and US$1.25/lb zinc.
(6) Mineral Resources are based on NSR cut-off grades of US$4.73/t for leach material and US$13.71/t for mill material.
(7) NSR value for leach material is as follows:

Kp Oxide: NSR (US$/t) = 30.77 x gold (g/t) + 0.068 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 70% and silver recovery of 11%

Ki Oxide: NSR (US$/t) = 24.61 x gold (g/t) + 0.092 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 56% and silver recovery of 15%

Tran-Hi: NSR (US$/t) = 26.37 x gold (g/t) + 0.166 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 60% and silver recovery of 27%

Tran-Lo: NSR (US$/t) = 17.58 x gold (g/t) + 0.209 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 40% and silver recovery of 34%.

 

Page 30

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

(8) NSR value for mill material is 36.75 x gold (g/t) + 0.429 x silver (g/t) + 10.75 x lead (%) + 11.77 x zinc (%), based on recoveries of 86% gold, 76% silver, 60% lead, and 64% zinc.
(9) Mineral Resources are constrained within a conceptual pit shell in order to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction, to meet the definition of Mineral Resource in NI 43-101; mineralization lying outside of the pit shell is not reported as a Mineral Resource.
(10) The Mineral Resource estimate requires the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to extend onto land held by the Adjacent Owner. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo property that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner.
(11) An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve.
(12) The leach mineral resource is inclusive of Mineral Reserves for the Camino Rojo Report. Mill resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves
(13) Kt = 1,000 tonnes; koz = 1,000 troy ounces; mlb = million pounds (imperial); t = tonne (1,000 kilograms).

 

There are certain risks associated with the Mineral Resource estimate that investors should be aware of, as follows:

 

The Camino Rojo Project Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the Company can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Company.

 

All the mineralization comprised in the Mineral Resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by the Adjacent Owner and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the Mineral Resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the Mineral Resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Camino Rojo Report, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full Mineral Resource. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full Mineral Resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The Camino Rojo Report is based on only a portion of the total Mineral Resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles.

 

The Mineral Resource estimate was prepared based on the Qualified Person’s reasoned judgment, in accordance with Canadian Institute of Mining, metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Best Practices Guidelines and his professional standards of competence, that there is a reasonable expectation that all necessary permits, agreements and approvals will be obtained and maintained, including an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to allow mining of waste material on its mineral concessions. In particular, when determining the prospects for eventual economic extraction, consideration was given to industry practice, including the past practices of the Adjacent Owner in entering similar agreements on commercially reasonable terms, and a timeframe of 10-15 years.

 

The project described in the Camino Rojo Report is based on only a portion of the total Mineral Resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the proposed mine plan in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

Page 31

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Mineral Resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions.

 

The estimation of Mineral Resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. In particular, the estimation of Mineral Resources for the Camino Rojo Project assumes that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the Mineral Resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached. Although all mineralization included in the Company’s Mineral Resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the Mineral Resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in Mineral Resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES

 

The Mineral Reserve estimate at the Camino Rojo Project includes Proven and Probable Mineral Reserve totalling 44.0 million tonnes at 0.73 g Au/t and 14.2 g Ag/t for 1.03 million contained gold ounces and 20.1 million contained silver ounces. Recoverable gold is estimated as 662,300 ounces based on an average recovery of 64%. Recoverable silver is estimated as 3.48 million ounces based on an average recovery of 17%. Direct feed material in the Mineral Reserve is material that will be processed the same year it is mined. The low-grade stockpile material will be processed after the open pit is completed. The effective date of this Mineral Reserve estimation is 24 June 2019.

 

The Mineral Reserve estimation is based on an open pit mine plan and mine production schedule developed by IMC. Processing is based on crushing and heap leaching to recover gold and silver. The Mineral Reserve is based on a gold price of US$1,250 per ounce and a silver price of US$17.00 per ounce. Measured Mineral Resource in the mine production schedule was converted to proven Mineral Reserve and indicated Mineral Resource in the schedule was converted to probable Mineral Reserve.

 

IMC does not believe that there are significant risks to the Mineral Reserve estimate based on environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, infrastructure, or political factors. There has been a significant amount of metallurgical testing and the infrastructure requirements are relatively straightforward compared to many operations. However, recoveries lower than forecast would result is loss of revenue for the project. There has also been some potential preg-robbing material identified in the deposit, as discussed in the Camino Rojo Report, but this does not appear to represent a significant risk.

 

There is risk to the Mineral Reserve based on mining factors. As discussed in the Camino Rojo Report, the slope angle assumptions are based on careful application of wall control blasting, and the north and west wall slope angles are also based on significant mechanical support. Failure of these systems to perform as expected would result in less ore available for the process plant and potentially a shorter project life. Also, slope stability issues on the north wall of the pit could be difficult to mitigate due to lack of access to the ground north of the pit.

 

Other risks to the Mineral Reserve are related to economic parameters such as prices lower than forecast or costs higher than the current estimates. The impact of these is modeled in the sensitivity study with the economic analysis in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Mineral Reserve estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla as is all the proposed development and mining and processing activities.

 

Page 32

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The below table presents a summary of the Mineral Reserve at Camino Rojo:

 

Mineral Reserve

 

Reserve Class   Ktonnes     NSR
(US$/t)
    Gold
(g/t)
    Silver
(g/t)
    Gold
Recov
(%)
    Silver
Recov (%)
    Cont.
Gold
(koz)
    Cont.
Silver
(koz)
    Recoverable
Gold
(koz)
    Recoverable
Silver
(koz)
 
Proven Mineral Reserve
Direct Feed     13,331       22.87       0.84       15.6       65.6 %     16.5 %     358.8       6,698       235.3       1,107  
Low Grade Stockpile     1,264       7.19       0.27       10.0       61.3 %     13.9 %     10.9       406       6.7       56  
Total Proven Mineral Reserve:     14,595       21.51       0.79       15.1       65.5 %     16.4 %     369.7       7,104       242.1       1,164  
Probable Mineral Reserve
Direct Feed     25,939       20.27       0.76       14.4       63.8 %     18.0 %     629.8       12,029       402.1       2,168  
Low Grade Stockpile     3,485       7.05       0.28       8.6       58.1 %     15.2 %     31.3       962       18.2       147  
Total Probable Mineral Reserve:     29,424       18.70       0.70       13.7       63.6 %     17.8 %     661.1       12,991       420.3       2,315  
Probable/Probable Mineral Reserve
Direct Feed     39,270       21.15       0.78       14.8       64.5 %     17.5 %     988.6       18,726       637.5       3,275  
Low Grade Stockpile     4,749       7.09       0.28       9.0       58.9 %     14.8 %     42.3       1,368       24.9       203  
Total Probable/Probable Reserve:     44,019       19.63       0.73       14.2       64.3 %     17.3 %     1,030.9       20,095       662.4       3,478  

 

Notes:

 

(1) The Mineral Reserve estimate has an effective date of June 24, 2019.
(2) Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding.
(3) Mineral Reserves are based on prices of $1,250/oz gold and $17/oz silver.
(4) Mineral Reserves are based on NSR cut-offs that vary by time period to balance mine and plant production capacities. They range from a low of $4.73/t to a high of $9.00/t.
(5) NSR value for leach material is as follows:

Kp Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 27.46 x gold (g/t) + 0.057 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 70% and silver recovery of 11%

Ki Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 21.97 x gold (g/t) + 0.078 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 56% and silver recovery of 15%

Tran-Hi: NSR ($/t) = 23.54 x gold (g/t) + 0.140 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 60% and silver recovery of 27%

Tran-Lo: NSR ($/t) = 15.69 x gold (g/t) + 0.177 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 40% and silver recovery of 34%

(6) Operating costs – mining US$1.94/t mined; process US$3.41/t processed; G&A US$1.32/t processed; includes a 2% royalty.
(7) Refining cost per ounce – gold US$5.00; silver US$0.50.
(8) Kt = 1,000 tonnes; koz = 1,000 troy ounces; t = tonne (1,000 kilograms).

 

MINING OPERATIONS (MINING METHODS)

 

The Camino Rojo mine will be a conventional open pit mine. Mine operations will consist of drilling medium diameter blast holes (approximately 17 cm), blasting with either explosive slurries or ammonium nitrate/fuel oil (“ANFO”) depending on water conditions, and loading into large off-road trucks with hydraulic shovels and wheel loaders. Ore will be delivered to the primary crusher and waste will be delivered to the waste storage facility southeast of the pit. There will also be a low-grade stockpile facility to store marginal resource for processing at the end of commercial pit operations. There will be a fleet of track dozers, rubber-tired dozers, motor graders and water trucks to maintain the working areas of the pit, waste storage areas, and haul roads. The mine plan was developed to supply ore to a conventional crushing and heap leach facility with the capacity to process 18,000 tpd. The mine is scheduled to operate two 10-hour shifts per day for 365 days per year. Due to space limitations there is only one mining phase, the final pit. The final pit design is based on the results of a floating cone analysis using the parameters discussed in the Camino Rojo Report. Eventually, mining will be conducted below the water table, probably during Year 4 of commercial operation. Estimates of pit dewatering requirements have been prepared for cost estimation purposes, but additional hydrogeological studies may be required to better estimate the requirements. There is a risk that the estimated pit dewatering costs may change as a result of these studies.

 

Page 33

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The mine plan is constrained by the Adjacent Owner’s concession boundary on the north side of the pit. The Camino Rojo Report is based on only a portion of the total Mineral Resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

PROCESSING AND RECOVERY OPERATIONS

 

Test work results developed by KCA and others have indicated that the part of the Camino Rojo Mineral Resource is amenable to heap leaching for the recovery of gold and silver. Based on a Mineral Reserve of 44.0 million tonnes and established processing rate of 18,000 tonnes per day of ore, the project has an estimated mine life of approximately 6.8 years.

 

Ore will be mined using standard open pit mining methods and delivered to the crushing circuit using haul trucks which will direct-dump into a dump hopper; front-end loaders will feed material to the dump hopper as needed from a run of mine (“ROM”) stockpile located near the primary crusher. Ore will be crushed to a final product size of 80% passing 28mm (100% passing 38mm) using a two-stage closed crushing circuit. The crushing circuit will operate 7 days/week, 24 hours/day with an overall estimated availability of 75%.

 

The crushed product will be stockpiled using a fixed stacker, reclaimed by belt feeders to a reclaim conveyor, and conveyed to the heap stacking system by an overland conveyor system. Pebble lime will be added to the reclaim conveyor belt for pH control; agglomeration with cement is not needed.

 

Stacked ore will be leached using a drip irrigation system for solution application; sprinkler irrigation will be used beginning in Year 4 of operations to increase evaporation rates and avoid the need for water treatment from pit dewatering. After percolating through the ore, the gold and silver bearing pregnant leach solution will drain by gravity to a pregnant solution pond where it will be collected and pumped to a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant. Pregnant solution will be pumped through clarification filter presses to remove any suspended solids before being deaerated in a vacuum tower to remove oxygen. Ultra-fine zinc dust will be added to the deaerated pregnant solution to precipitate gold and silver values, which will be collected by precipitate filter presses. Barren leach solution leaving the precipitate filter presses will flow to a barren solution tank and will then be pumped to the heap for further leaching. High strength cyanide solution will be injected into the barren solution to maintain the cyanide concentration in the leach solutions at the desired levels.

 

The precipitate from the Merrill-Crowe recovery plant will be processed in the refinery. Precipitate will be treated by an electric mercury retort with a fume collection system for drying and removal of mercury before being mixed with fluxes and smelted using an induction smelting furnace to produce the final doré product.

 

An event pond is included to collect contact solution from storm events. Solution collected will be returned to the process as soon as practical. Evaporators will be installed in the event pond beginning in Year 3 of operation to remove excess water generated by pit dewatering.

 

INFRASTRUCTURE, PERMITTING AND COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES

 

Existing infrastructure for the Camino Rojo Project includes a 30-person exploration camp and dirt and gravel roads throughout the project site. Internet and limited cellular communications are currently available, though these systems will need to be expanded for operations.

 

Page 34

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Access to the project site is by the paved four lane Mexican Highway 54 and Route 62, a secondary paved highway that passes through San Tiburcio. This is approximately 260 km southwest of Monterrey and 190 km northeast of Zacatecas.

 

A private road will enter the mine property approximately 250 m northeast of the intersection between highway 54 and 62. This road will provide access to the camps, offices, mine, process plant and other project facilities. Site access roads will be constructed during pre-production and will include approximately 24 km of dirt and gravel roads. Access to the project will be limited to one main gate to access process and camp areas, ensuring only authorized employees, contractors and visitors are allowed onto the property or inside the critical facilities. The entrance will be manned 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for identification control, random checks, drug and alcohol monitoring and vehicle check-in/out. A security contractor will be used for general site security and protection of mine assets.

 

The project infrastructure will also include a one-km by 30 m air strip to allow for small passenger planes to land and take off at the project site. The air strip will be constructed by grading and compacting the existing surface and is located south of the heap leach pad. The air strip does not include any infrastructure or provisions for fueling or maintenance of planes or other aircraft. The air strip will be located approximately 700 m south of the event pond.

 

The onsite operations camp will be arranged to lodge up to 408 people and will be under maximum occupancy during the construction phase (multiple bunks in rooms that will be single rooms during operations).

 

Power supply to the Camino Rojo Project will initially be generated on site using two each 2500 ekW diesel generator units operating, with an additional unit on standby, as well as by the existing power line which services the surrounding area. Power will be generated at 4160 V, 3 phase, 60 Hz and stepped up to 13.8 kV by a transformer for site distribution. The generator system has been sized to meet both the average power demand of 4.8 MW as well as the peak estimated demand of 6 MW based on detailed electrical loads with estimated utilization and demand factors. The existing power line has a reported 1 MW of capacity which will be used to supply power to dedicated loads (man camp, site buildings, water supply). The existing power line will be stepped down from 34.5 kV to 13.8 kV.

 

It is assumed that in Year 2 of operations, power supply will be available by connecting to the national grid and power generation at site will no longer be needed. Overhead power lines will connect 34.5 kV, three phase and 60 Hz power system, pending Centro Nacional de Control de Energía (“CENACE”) approval, to a metering and switching substation. This main substation will be located at approximately NAD27 245609E, 2674826N. Power from the main substation will be stepped down to 13.8 kV and connected to the existing switch gear for site distribution. The temporary generators and associated fuel tanks will be removed once line power is available.

 

Total project water supply will be sourced from production wells located within the property boundary. Process make-up water will also be supplied during pit dewatering activities starting in about Year 4. Total water consumption for the project will average 24 liters per second (“L/s”) with a peak water demand of 33 L/s.

 

Project buildings will primarily be prefabricated steel buildings or concrete masonry unit buildings and include an administration building, contract mining office, mine truck shop, warehouse, workshop, laboratory, guard house, medical clinic, refinery and motor control centres (“MCC”).

 

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by the Federal agency of the Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources), known by its acronym “SEMARNAT”, which has authority over the two principal Federal permits:

 

· a Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement), known by its acronym as an “MIA” accompanied by an Estudio de Riesgo (Risk Study); and

 

· Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Used Change) permit, known by its acronym as a “CUS”, supported by an Estudio Tecnico Justificativo (Technical Justification Study).

 

Thus far exploration work at the Camino Rojo Project has been conducted under the auspices of two separate MIA permits and corresponding CUS permits. These permits allow for extensive exploration drilling but are not sufficient for mine construction or operation.

 

Page 35

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Baseline environmental studies required for mine permitting were commissioned by Orla in April 2018 and were completed in May 2019 by independent consultants. The project area includes five flora species with legally protected status and nine fauna species that are listed as threatened or protected. In accordance with Federal laws, 100% of the protected plants will be rescued and transplanted prior to construction and qualified biologists will survey the areas to be disturbed to identify nesting areas, dens and lairs of animals present. Any animals not naturally prone to leave the area that are found will be relocated to suitable habitats elsewhere in the property area. Permitting documents for the MIA and CUS required to build the mine as described in the Camino Rojo Report were submitted to SEMARNAT in August 2019. The Company was notified that the CUS was accepted on December 12, 2019 and subsequently paid the required fees in January 2020. The Company received a series of questions and requests for additional information on the MIA in November 2019. This is a normal part of the process. A reply was submitted to this on December 20, 2019. On January 13, 2020, SEMARNAT notified the Company of a one-time 60 working-day extension to the MIA review. This would result in the review being completed in mid April 2020.

 

The project is not located in an area with any special Federal environmental protection designation and no factors have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required Federal and State environmental permits.

 

In April 2018, Orla commissioned Environmental Resources Management (“ERM”), a global provider of environmental, health, safety, risk, social consulting and sustainability related services group to conduct an independent assessment of social and community impacts of the development of the Camino Rojo Project, and to provide guidance on actions and policies needed to ensure that Orla obtains and maintains social license to operate. The study was completed in May 2019 and salient results are being incorporated into the project development and permitting plans. Key points are summarized as follows:

 

Principal concerns of affected stakeholders in surrounding communities are:

 

i. Employment of community members

 

ii. Community benefits from improved public services and investment in community development

 

iii. Environmental contamination

 

iv. Increased community population and strain on public services

 

v. Water shortages

 

Principal concerns of Ejido members whose land is affected are:

 

i. Just economic compensation

 

ii. Assistance in obtaining title to informally owned parcels

 

Principal concerns of local and State government authorities are:

 

i. Generation of employment

 

ii. Improvement of local infrastructure

 

iii. Service contracts to local businesses

 

iv. Environmental contamination.

 

ERM identified the principal social and community impacts of the project and opined that the project does not put at risk the social environment of the nearby communities because the impacts can be mitigated or made positive with the implementation of a Social Management System (“SMS”). ERM has designed this SMS based on International Association of Impact Assessment best practices.

 

Page 36

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CAPITAL AND OPERATING COST ESTIMATES

 

Capital and operating costs for the process and general administration components of the Camino Rojo Project were estimated by KCA. Costs for the mining components were provided by IMC. All costs are presented in first quarter 2019 US dollars. Where prices were quoted in Mexican Pesos, an exchange rate of 19.3 MXN:1 US$ was used. Estimated costs are considered to have an accuracy of +/-15%.

 

Capital Cost Estimates

 

The total life of mine (“LOM”) capital cost for the Camino Rojo Project is US$153.7 million, including US$10.1 million in working capital and not including reclamation and closure costs which are estimated at US$19.8 million, value added tax (“IVA”) or other taxes. A total contingency of US$18.6 million or 12% of the total LOM capital costs is included. IVA is applied to all capital costs at 16% and is assumed to be fully refundable within one calendar year.

 

The below table presents the capital cost requirements for the Camino Rojo Project:

 

Capital Cost Summary

 

Description   Cost (US$)  
Pre-Production Capital   $ 123,114,000  
Working Capital and Initial Fills   $ 10,187,000  
Sustaining Capital – Mine and Process   $ 20,424,000  
TOTAL (excluding IVA)   $ 153,725,000  

 

The costs presented were primarily estimated by KCA with input from IMC on owner mining and mining contractor mobilization costs. Material take-offs for earthworks, concrete and major piping were estimated by KCA. All equipment and material requirements are based on design information described in detail in the Camino Rojo Report. Capital costs estimates were made primarily using budgetary supplier quotes for all major and most minor equipment as well as contractor quotes for major construction contracts. Multiple quotes were received for all major packages (three or more in most cases). Where project specific quotes were not available a reasonable estimate or allowance was made based on recent quotes in KCA/IMC’s files. In total, more than 90% of the Camino Rojo Project direct costs are based on supplier and contractor quotes. All capital cost estimates were based on the purchase of equipment quoted new from the manufacturer or estimated to be fabricated new.

 

Operating Cost Estimates

 

The average LOM operating cost for the Camino Rojo Project is US$8.43 per tonne of ore processed. IVA is not included in the operating costs. The below table presents the LOM operating cost requirements for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Operating Cost Summary

 

Description   LOM Cost (US$/t)  
Mine   $ 3.30  
Process and Support Services   $ 3.38  
Site G&A   $ 1.75  
TOTAL   $ 8.43  

 

Mining costs were provided by IMC at US$2.14 per tonne mined (LOM US$3.30 per tonne of ore) and are based on quotes for contract mining with estimated owner’s mining costs.

 

Page 37

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Process operating costs have been estimated by KCA from first principles. Labour costs were estimated using project specific staffing, salary and wage and benefit requirements. Unit consumptions of materials, supplies, power, water and delivered supply costs were also estimated. LOM average processing costs are estimated at US$3.38 per tonne ore. General administrative costs (“G&A”) have been estimated by KCA with input from Orla. G&A costs include project specific labour and salary requirements and operating expenses, including social contributions, land access and water rights. G&A costs are estimated at US$1.75 per tonne ore. Operating costs were estimated based on first quarter 2019 US dollars and are presented with no added contingency based upon the design and operating criteria present in the Camino Rojo Report. IVA is not included in the operating cost estimate. The operating costs presented are based upon the ownership of all process production equipment and site facilities, including the onsite laboratory. The owner will employ and direct all process operations, maintenance and support personnel for all site activities.

 

The required capital cost estimates were based on the design outlined in the Camino Rojo Report. The scope of these costs includes all expenditures for process facilities, infrastructure, construction indirect costs, mine contactor mobilization and owner mining capital costs for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

The total pre-production capital cost estimate for the Camino Rojo Project is estimated at US$133.3 million, including all process equipment and infrastructure, construction indirect costs, mine contractor mobilization and working capital.

 

Total mine operating cost during commercial production is estimated at US$145.2 million.

 

All costs are presented in first quarter 2019 US dollars. Where prices were quoted in Mexican Pesos and an exchange rate of 19.3 MXN:1 US$ was used.

 

Detailed costs for each discipline are included in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

 

Based on the estimated production parameters, capital costs, and operating costs, a cash flow model was prepared for the economic analysis of the Camino Rojo Project. The project economics were evaluated using a discounted cash flow method, which measures the net present value (“NPV”) of future cash flow streams. The final economic model was developed by KCA, with input from Orla, using the following assumptions:

 

· The cash flow model is based on the mine production schedule from IMC;

 

· period of analysis of twelve years (includes two years of pre-production and investment, seven years of production and three years for reclamation and closure);

 

· gold price of US$1,250/oz and silver price of US$17/oz;

 

· an exchange rate of 19.3 MXN:US$1;

 

· processing rate of 18,000 tonnes per day material;

 

· gold and silver overall recoveries of 64% for gold and 17% for silver, derived as follows: (i) estimated gold recoveries (including 2% field deduction) of 70% for Kp Oxide, 56% for Ki Oxide, 60% for Transition-hi; and 40% for Transition-lo; and (ii) estimated silver recoveries (including 3% field deduction) of 11% for Kp Oxide, 15% for Ki Oxide, 27% for Transition-hi and 34% for Transition-lo;

 

· capital and operating costs as summarized above (which are set forth in detail in the Camino Rojo Report); and

 

· 2% NSR to Newmont, 0.5% NSR extraordinary mining duty to the Mexican government, 7.5% special mining tax to the Mexican government plus 30% income tax to Mexican government.

 

Page 38

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

A summary of the key economic parameters is shown in the below table:

 

Key Economic Parameters

 

Item   Value     Units
Gold Price     1,250     US$/oz
Silver Price     17     US$/oz
Gold Avg. Recovery     64     %
Silver Avg. Recovery     17     %
Treatment Rate     18,000     t/d
Refining and Transportation Cost, gold     1.40     US$/oz
Refining and Transportation Cost, gold     1.20     US$/oz
Payable Factor, gold     99.9     %
Payable Factor, silver     98.0     %
Annual Produced Au, Avg.     97,000     oz
Annual Produced Ag, Avg.     511,000     oz
Income and Corporate Tax Rate     30     %
Special Mining Tax Rate     7.5     %
Royalties 1     2.50     %
Mine Life     6.8     years
Payback period (Years based on After-Tax)     3.0     years

 

 

1 (comprised of 2% to Newmont and an Extraordinary Mining Duty of 0.05%)

 

Page 39

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Economic Analysis Summary

 

Economic Analysis (US$)    
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pre-Tax   38.6%
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax   28.7%
Average Annual Cashflow (Pre-Tax)   $72 Million
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax)   $227 Million
Average Annual Cashflow (After-Tax)   $56 Million
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax)   $142 Million
Gold Price Assumption   $1,250/ounce
Silver Price Assumption   $17/ounce
Pay-Back Period (Years based on After-Tax)   3.0 years
Capital Costs (Excluding IVA) (US$)
Initial Capital   $123 Million
LOM Sustaining Capital   $20 Million
  Total LOM Capital   $144 million
Working Capital and Initial Fills   $10 Million
Reclamation and Closure Costs   $20 Million
Operating Costs (Average LOM) (US$)
Mining   $2.14/tonne mined
Mining (Processed)   $3.30/tonne processed
Processing and Support   $3.38/tonne processed
G&A   $1.75 /tonne processed
  Total Operating Cost   $8.43/tonne processed
Total By-Product Cash Cost   $515/ounce Au
All-in Sustaining Cost   $576/ounce Au
Production Data
LOM   6.8 years
Total Tonnes to Crusher   44,020,000 tonnes
Grade gold (Avg.)   0.73 g/t
Grade silver (Avg.)   14.2 g/t
Contained gold oz   1,031,000 ounces
Contained silver oz   20,093,000 ounces
Mine Throughput per day   18,000 tonnes/day
Mine Throughput per year   6,570,000 tonnes/year
Metallurgical Recovery Gold (Overall)   64%
Metallurgical Recovery Silver (Overall)   17%
Average Annual Gold Production   97,000 ounces
Average Annual Silver Production   511,000 ounces
Total Gold Produced   662,000 ounces
Total Silver Produced   3,479,000 ounces
LOM Strip Ratio   0.54:1

 

Page 40

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Sensitivity

 

To estimate the relative economic strength of the Camino Rojo Project, base case sensitivity analyses were completed analyzing the economic sensitivity to several parameters including changes in gold price, capital costs, average operating cash cost per tonne of ore processed and exchange rate. The sensitivities are based on +/- 25% of the base case for capital costs, operating costs and exchange rate and select gold prices. Variations in gold price, ore grades and recovery rates have the largest influence on the sensitivity of the Camino Rojo Project. From these sensitivities it can be seen that the Camino Rojo Project is economically robust.

 

The economic indicators chosen for sensitivity evaluation are the internal rate of return (“IRR”) and NPV at 5% and 10% discount rate.

 

After-Tax Sensitivity Analysis Results

 

                NPV  
    Variation     IRR     5%     10%  
Gold Price                                
    $ 1,000       15.9 %   $ 59,068,000     $ 25,895,000  
    $ 1,125       22.8 %   $ 101,241,000     $ 58,528,000  
    $ 1,250       28.7 %   $ 141,580,000     $ 89,534,000  
    $ 1,375       34.3 %   $ 182,146,000     $ 120,710,000  
    $ 1,500       39.7 %   $ 222,711,000     $ 151,886,000  
Capital Costs                                
75%   $ 130,013,659       38.7 %   $ 165,153,000     $ 112,375,000  
90%   $ 150,016,306       32.2 %   $ 151,009,000     $ 98,671,000  
100%   $ 163,351,404       28.7 %   $ 141,580,000     $ 89,534,000  
110%   $ 176,686,502       25.7 %   $ 132,151,000     $ 80,398,000  
125%   $ 196,689,149       21.9 %   $ 118,008,000     $ 66,694,000  
Operating Costs                                
75%   $ 278,366,386       35.5 %   $ 189,191,000     $ 126,195,000  
90%   $ 334,039,663       31.5 %   $ 160,625,000     $ 104,198,000  
100%   $ 371,155,181       28.7 %   $ 141,580,000     $ 89,534,000  
110%   $ 408,270,699       25.9 %   $ 122,536,000     $ 74,870,000  
125%   $ 463,943,977       21.4 %   $ 93,317,000     $ 52,279,000  
Exchange Rate                                
75%     14.475       25.2 %   $ 123,861,000     $ 74,932,000  
90%     17.37       27.5 %   $ 135,673,000     $ 84,666,000  
100%     19.30       28.7 %   $ 141,580,000     $ 89,534,000  
110%     21.23       29.7 %   $ 146,412,000     $ 93,516,000  
125%     24.125       31.0 %   $ 152,208,000     $ 98,292,000  

 

INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CAMINO ROJO REPORT

 

The Camino Rojo Report states that the work which has been completed to date has demonstrated that the Camino Rojo open pit mine and heap leach is a technically and economically viable project, which is conveniently located with access via Mexican highway 54 which connects the major cities of Zacatecas and Saltillo. The project terrain is predominately flat and sufficient water for operations is available from wells located at the project site. Required mineral, surface and water rights have all been secured. The mine plan developed as the base case for the Camino Rojo Report has identified 44.0 million tonnes of ore at an average grade of 0.73 g/t Au and 14.2 g/t Ag. This amounts to 1.03 million contained ounces of gold and 20.1 million contained ounces of silver. The mine life is about 6.8 years and the life of mine strip ratio is 0.54 to 1, a relatively low ratio for a precious metal pit.

 

Page 41

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The project has been designed as an open-pit mine with heap leach for recovery of gold and silver from oxide and transition material. Ore will be crushed to P80 28mm, stockpiled, reclaimed and conveyor stacked onto the heap leach pad at an average rate of 18,000 tonnes/day. Stacked material will be leached using low grade sodium cyanide solution and the resulting pregnant leach solution will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe plant for the recovery of gold and silver by zinc cementation followed by drying and smelting to produce the final doré product.

 

Metallurgical test work completed indicates that the material is amenable to cyanide leaching for the recovery of precious metals with overall recoveries of 64% for gold and 17% for silver with low to moderate reagent consumptions and will produce an estimated 662,000 ounces of gold and 3.5 million ounces of silver. Cement agglomeration is not required for heap heights up to 80 m with only lime being required for pH control.

 

Potentially preg-robbing material has been identified within the Camino Rojo ore body. A significant campaign was carried out to identify the material associated with preg-robbing with results indicating that the potentially preg-rob material is only a minor component of the total material and is found primarily at depth and is associated with the transition material with almost none of the oxide showing preg-robbing tendencies. Deleterious effects from preg-robbing should be able to be mitigated with proper ore control toward the end of the project life.

 

Key opportunities for the Camino Rojo Project include:

 

· A portion of the Mineral Resources amenable to heap leaching that are not in the current Mineral Reserves are located just below the bottom of the pit outlined in the Feasibility Study and at relatively shallow depths on the north side of the pit. Obtaining a layback agreement with the Adjacent Owner would allow much of this material to be included in an expended mine plan.

 

· In addition to the Mineral Resource amenable to heap leaching, the feasibility study contained in the Camino Rojo Report has identified a Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource of sulphide material that is amenable to milling and flotation concentration of 258.8 million tonnes at 0.88 g/t Au and 7.4 g/t Ag. This amounts to 7.3 million contained ounces of gold and 61.6 million contained ounces of silver. Additional metallurgical studies will be required to support the estimated metallurgical recoveries for this material. This deeper sulphide Mineral Resource is contained on Orla property, but an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be required to exploit this by open pit mining methods. The selected heap leach pad and mine waste dump locations have been placed so that they are outside the footprint of any potential open pit developed to mine the sulphide material.

 

· Due to the uniform topography of the Camino Rojo property, earthworks quantities needed for elevating the haul roads to meet the required height of the primary crusher incur large capital costs. Utilizing a decoupled system (a conveyor at lower elevation to feed the crusher) would decrease initial earthworks quantities as well as fuel requirements from truck haulage throughout the life of the project.

 

· Leaching cycles have been designed for 80 days, but laboratory results have shown that silver recoveries benefit from cyanide solution application beyond the 80-day period. With subsequent lifts, draindown from active lifts will result in extended leaching times on previously leached lifts. As a result of this, silver recoveries are expected to increase over the LOM of the project.

 

· The Camino Rojo deposit occurs within a mineralized district that is highly prospective for discovery of additional deposits. New discoveries of Mineral Resources in the vicinity of the proposed mine may be accretive to project value.

 

Risks for the Camino Rojo Project, other than those already discussed in this Annual Information Form, include:

 

· Camino Rojo considers contract mining as part of the base case study. There is a risk that the selected mining contractor may require financial assistance from the owner, either in terms of cash, or loan guarantees, to procure some equipment, which may increase capital costs. Contract mining is common in Mexico and this risk can be minimized by careful evaluation of potential contractors.

 

Page 42

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

· There is geotechnical risk associated with the base case mine plan that is constrained by the property boundary. Mitigation of any slope failures of the north wall could prove difficult due to lack of access to the ground to the north. The design slope angles on the north and west wall are relatively steep and assume aggressive slope reinforcement utilizing closely spaced cemented rebar dowels along the pit wall. The slope angles will be flatter than design if this system fails to work as expected. The slope angle design also assumes much of the wall will be pre-split using lightly loaded, approximate 100mm diameter blast holes, spaced 1 m to 1.2 m along the final pit wall. This is to maintain bench face angles of about 72o and allow safe catch bench widths. If this does not work as anticipated, or it is decided not to utilize this in some areas, the slope angles will be flatter than design. These geotechnical risks could reduce the amount of material mined and the amount of ore available for processing.

 

· Carbonaceous material with preg-robbing characteristics has been identified, which may reduce overall heap performance and metal recovery if processed. In regard to gold and silver recovery the Camino Rojo deposit shows preg-robbing organic carbon as being the only significant deleterious element identified, which is primarily associated with the transition material at depth along the outer edges of the deposit. Preg robbing presents a low risk to the overall Project. A significant investigation by Orla into the preg robbing material which was reviewed by KCA indicates that preg robbing material will most likely not be encountered until later in the project life and can be mitigated by proper ore control.

 

· Evaporators for pit dewatering require a minimum operating depth in the pond for operation, which is assumed to be approximately 1.5 m, or approximately 46,500 m3 of solution. Based on the pond sizing criteria there is sufficient capacity in the event pond to accommodate this additional solution for the planned heap without any changes. However, evaporation rates of water from the pit may not consistently be as estimated which may lead to some periodic loss of pond storage.

 

· There is a risk that Merrill-Crowe efficiencies may be poor, particularly during initial operations due to low pregnant solution concentrations. This may result in increased zinc consumption and delayed metal recoveries.

 

· The project is subject to normal risks regarding access, title, permitting, and security. The project has had a productive relationship with the surface owners and no extraordinary risks to project access were discerned. Conditional upon continued compliance with annual requirements, no risk to validity of title was discerned. Conditional upon compliance with applicable regulations, permits for normal exploration activities, mine construction, and mine operation are expected to be attainable. Drug related violence, propagated by members of criminal cartels and directed against other members of criminal cartels, has occurred in the region and has affected local communities. The aggression is not directed at mining companies operating in the region and has not affected the ability of Orla or previous operators to explore the Camino Rojo property.

 

· The project considers running a powerline from Conception Del Oro, approximately 55km from the project site, to provide power to site early in the project life. The application for the power line requires an investigation by CENACE to determine where the Project is allowed to connect to the grid, followed by approval from the Mexican CFE to construct the powerline. It is assumed that by Year 2 of operations power supply will be available by connecting to the national commercial grid and power generation at site will no longer be needed. There is a possibility that connection to the national grid will occur later than Year 2 and will require an extended time period of diesel power generation. This delay in access to lined power would incur additional operating costs for any duration beyond the expected date of connection to the commercial power grid. The estimated operating costs for generated power is approximately 37% more than line power.

 

· An ecological tax implemented by the state Congress of Zacatecas in 2017 could have a significant impact on the economics of the Project. This tax is applied to cubic metres of material extracted during mining, square metres of material impacted by dangerous substances, tonnes of carbon dioxide produced during mining processes and tonnes of waste stored in landfills. Due to the uncertainty of application of this tax and turbulence between active mining companies and the State of Zacatecas, the long term affects, and implementation of this ecological tax are currently unknown.

 

Page 43

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

· The primary project production well (PW-1) underwent a 10,000-minute pumping test and a sustained flow of 32 L/s was maintained. However, there is a risk that the fracture system in the limestone has limited potential to provide water and that flow to the well could decrease over the life of the project. Development of additional wells will mitigate this risk.

 

· Based on the results of the Camino Rojo Report, the Camino Rojo Report recommends the following additional work in regard to process and infrastructure development:

 

· Application and approval for the power line to the project site should continue to be advanced. Estimated costs for this are approximately US$130,000 and are included in the cost estimates of the Camino Rojo Report.

 

· Engage with the Adjacent Owner to reach an agreement allowing expansion of the proposed mine pit and Mineral Resource.

 

· In addition to continuing the exploration work underway, the Camino Rojo Report recommends a two-phase exploration program, consisting of:

 

Phase 1

 

· 950 line-km of IP geophysical surveys to seek additional mineralized zones concealed by colluvium;
     
· a 5,000 m core drill program to evaluate the sulphide resource underlying and adjacent to the oxide and transition mineralization that is the focus of the Camino Rojo Report , with the goal of defining mineralization that may be economically processed through a mill and flotation plant; and
     
· a 5,000 m RC drill program to test IP anomalies already identified; then

 

Phase 2, which is conditional upon identification of new IP anomalies, comprised of:

 

· a 5,000 m RC drill program to test newly defined IP anomalies; and
     
· a 5,000 m core drilling program to evaluate the mineralized zones thus discovered.

 

The total estimated cost to complete the first phase of the recommended exploration work is US$3.25 million. Conditional upon positive results from the first phase, the second phase of recommended work is estimated to cost US$1.80 million.

 

The Camino Rojo Report also recommends:

 

· additional RC test drilling leading to the construction of one or more back up or reserve production wells which should have a pump-tested sustainable capacity of at least 15 to 20 L/s; and,

 

· drilling and construction of the proposed monitoring wells that have not yet been completed.

 

The estimated cost for the proposed water well drilling and development is approximately US$1.0 million and is included in the capital cost estimate.

 

Page 44

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

OUTLOOK/FUTURE PLANS

 

Since June 25, 2019, the effective date of the Camino Rojo Report, efforts on the Camino Rojo Project have focussed on bringing the mine as outlined in the Feasibility Study to development. Environmental assessment studies required for permitting of the mine were completed and submitted to SEMARNAT in August 2019. On December 12, 2019 the Company received notification from SEMARNAT granting approval of the Change of Land Use permit (“Cambio de Uso de Suelo” or “CUS/ETJ”), one of the two key permits required prior to the start of construction. Questions and a request for additional information on the Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (“MIA”), the other key permit required, were received in November 2019. A reply was submitted in December 2019 and this permit is expected to be in hand in time to allow construction to start in the first half of 2020.

 

On September 9, 2019, Orla announced that a contract for engineering, procurement and construction management (“EPCM”) for the Camino Rojo Oxide Project was awarded to M3 Engineering and Technology Corporation (“M3”). M3 is a full service EPCM firm headquartered in Tucson, Arizona and has provided services to over 10,000 projects for some 1,000 clients in its 33-year history. Work on the Camino Rojo project will be undertaken out of the M3 office in Hermosillo, Mexico with senior review and support from the Tucson, Arizona office. M3 will be responsible for detailed engineering, construction planning and execution, contractor management and cost control for the project under the auspices of Orla management.

 

Detailed engineering started in September and is ongoing. Bid documents for long-lead items such as the crushing plant are being completed and provided to potential suppliers. The Company has hired key senior managers for the project.

 

Other development related activities include drilling and establishing 11 additional groundwater monitoring wells, detailed surveying and additional geotechnical investigations and improvements to the existing camp to facilitate more people.

 

As well as development related activities, we continue to conduct a limited regional exploration program. Work completed since June 25, 2019 includes geological mapping, rock sampling, geophysics and 8 RC drill holes. A total of 113 line-km of IP were conducted in the southwest part of the property in a number of small grids centered on overburden covered areas with potential structural intercepts and indications of alteration in the general vicinity. One of the grids showed a well-defined chargeability anomaly that is roughly 1,000 by 400 m in size. It is in an area with large structures and rock outcrops to the southeast have zones with strong silicification and weakly anomalous trace-element geochemistry. The area of the anomaly is covered by overburden. Permits to allow drill testing of the anomaly have been received.

 

Low amplitude chargeability anomalies southeast and west of the resource area outlined in an IP survey completed in the first half of 2019 were tested with 8 RC holes totalling 2,536 m. No significant alteration was encountered. The anomalies are assumed to be related to groundwater with elevated total dissolved solids concentration encountered in the holes.

 

The Company maintains an active community and social relations (“CSR”) program. Significant CSR activities in the second half of 2019 include the following:

 

· completed construction of a preschool in El Berrendo;

 

· continued to support adult education programs;

 

· held Introduction to Mining courses for local residents;

 

· supported a number of community events;

 

· held a cervical cancer detection clinic in coordination with the Zacatecas health authorities;

 

· supported San Tiburcio to reactivate the construction of a local health center and in efforts to have a doctor assigned to the community; and

 

· assisted local communities to improve water wells.

 

Page 45

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Work on the Camino Rojo Project will continue to focus on development related activities. Regional exploration will continue to involve geology, sampling followed by geophysics in areas where potentially favourable indicators are found. The IP anomaly in the southwest part of the property will be drilled tested, as will a coincident IP and magnetic anomaly northeast of the resource area.

 

SUBSEQUENT EVENT

 

On March 23, 2020, the Company announced that it had entered into a non-binding letter agreement with Fresnillo Plc (“Fresnillo”) regarding the commercial terms on which Orla would obtain the right to expand the Camino Rojo oxide pit onto part of Fresnillo’s mineral concession located immediately to the north of Orla’s property under a definitive layback agreement. Under the terms of the layback agreement, Orla would pay Fresnillo, total cash consideration of US$62.8 million over a period of approximately 3.5 years. For further information on the transaction, please refer to the news release dated March 23, 2020 which can be found on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

THE CERRO QUEMA PROJECT

 

The following disclosure relating to the Cerro Quema Project has been derived, in part, from the independent technical report for the Cerro Quema Project titled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”) prepared by Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA. The Cerro Quema Report is available for review under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

PROJECT DESCRIPTION, LOCATION AND ACCESS

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in the Los Santos Province of south-western Panama. The Cerro Quema Project is located approximately 45 km south-southwest of the city of Chitré which 255 km by road from Panama City on the Panamanian Highway 150 km by air southwest of Panama City. The Project is located at Latitude 7° 33’ 14” N by Longitude 80° 32’ 56” W and at UTM coordinates 17N 549772 mE, 834994 mN (NAD83).

 

The Cerro Quema Project is accessible by road. Container loads of equipment and supplies can be shipped from the Panama Canal to the site by road. Oversized truckloads may require bypass arrangements around bridges and power lines. Chitré is the nearest town with regular air service. A helipad is available at the Project’s camp for emergency services.

 

The Cerro Quema Project comprises three contracts between the Republic of Panama and Minera Cerro Quema SA (“MCQ”) that grant exclusive rights for mineral extraction of class IV metallic minerals (silver and gold) over 14,893 ha dated between February 26, 1997 and March 3, 1997. The original term of the contracts was 20 years. The contracts can be extended for a first ten-year extension and then two additional extensions of five years each. The Government of Panama retains a 4% net smelter royalty.

 

The concession contracts held by Pershimco through its ownership of MCQ include the following provisions:

 

· the state reserves the right to explore and extract under the granted area, by itself or by concessions to third parties, other natural resources including different minerals to those granted under the contract;

 

· a land tax and royalty against production must be paid to the government as per Article 211 of the Mining Resources Code;

 

· the concession holder must submit to the government a detailed work plan each year including approximate cost;

 

Page 46

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

· the concession holder has the right to import equipment, parts, and supplies to be used in any mining operation free of importation taxes and custom fees, except for fuel and vehicles that are not used in the mining operation;

 

· a warranty fund in the amount of 100,000 Panamanian balboas (“PAB”) (equivalent to US$100,000) in the form of an insurance company deposit must be put in place to guarantee the payment of repairs for damage caused by dangerous acts or restoration due to abandonment for each concession. The fund must stay in place for two years after the expiration of the contract to ensure compliance; and

 

· a warranty fund in the amount of 15,000 PAB must be put in place to guarantee compliance with the obligations of each contract.

 

The original 20-year term for the concessions expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). Subsequent to the date of the Cerro Quema Report, the Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. The Company believes it has complied with all legal requirements in relation to the concessions. On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications were received, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal of the concessions. The Company has also received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. A permit was received on May 8, 2018 to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018 two permits to use water for drilling were received. An existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current resources was extended for two years in May 2018.

 

In October 2018, the government accepted our 2018 concession tax payments, and in February 2019, we paid the 2019 concession tax payments. A new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions was received on February 11, 2019. All drill permits are currently active. General elections were held in Panama in May 2019, which resulted in a change in federal government effective July 1, 2019. Subsequent to this, two permits allowing temporary use of water for exploration drilling were received on November 12, 2019 and an additional two temporary water permits were received on January 13, 2020. On February 3, 2020, the 2020 concession payments were made and accepted.

 

As of the date of this AIF, final concession renewals have not been received.

 

The Company owns the surface rights for land required to mine the Cerro Quema Mineral Reserves and to construct and operate a heap leach facility and part of the land required for proposed upgrades to the project access road.

 

Panama is a constitutional democracy and faces no current threats of hostility either domestically or externally.

 

HISTORY

 

Between 1990 and 1994, previous owners completed 4,622.5 metres of core drilling and 17,578.8 metres of RC drilling on the Cerro Quema Project as well as geological mapping and various geochemical surveys. In 1996, a further 1,749.6 metres of core drilling was performed on the La Pava deposit.

 

Resource estimates were completed in 1996 and 2002, and 2011, but such estimates were not prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 and are no longer considered applicable due to subsequent drilling and the current Mineral Resource estimations described below. There has been no production from the Cerro Quema Project.

 

GEOLOGICAL SETTING, MINERALIZATION, AND DEPOSIT TYPES

 

Regional Geology

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula, Panama. The Azuero Peninsula is a major topographic feature on the southwest (Pacific) coastline of Panama. The basement rocks of the Peninsula consist of massive and pillowed tholeiitic basalts that are currently interpreted to represent uplifted rocks from the western margin of the Caribbean plate. Following the onset of subduction at about 70 Ma, an arc magmatic sequence developed on the Azuero basement. The rocks of the Azuero Arc Group consist of volcanic rocks including associated tuffs and volcanoclastic rocks ranging in age from approximately 71 Ma to 40 Ma Late Cretaceous to Mid-Paleogene.

 

Page 47

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Local Geology

 

The Cerro Quema district is located within the Los Santos peninsula region in the central part of the Azuero Peninsula. Volcanic rocks in this part of the Azuero Peninsula consist of andesite, dacite, and basalt. Within and beneath the volcanic sequence are marine volcanoclastic sediments (conglomerate, sandstone, and mudstone), limestone and turbidites.

 

The lower unit of the Rio Quema Formation consists of andesitic lava flow rocks, crystal rich sandstone, and turbidites interbedded with hemipelagic limestone. The upper unit contains rocks erupted from submarine dacite lava domes that are inferred to have created a barrier within the fore-arc basin and restricted the marine and volcanoclastic sedimentation patterns. North of the dacite domes, the units comprise massive volcanic rocks, many dikes, and only minor volcanoclastic and limestone units. The upper unit of the Rio Quema formation is intruded by arc-related quartz diorite and granodiorite dike intrusions. The major geological structure on the Azuero Peninsula is the northwest-southeast striking Azuero-Sona fault. This fault separates two different basement terranes. Rocks on the southwest side of the fault are massive basalt flows and pillow lavas with interbedded volcanoclastic sediments. Basement rocks to the northeast of the fault are island-arc volcanics with basalt, andesite and dacite with interbedded sediments. Flat-lying sediments of the Tonasi Formation in places overly the basement rocks, particularly northeast of the Azuero-Sona fault on the southeast coast of the Azuero Peninsula. The Azuero-Sona fault has a very clear trace within the topography of southwest Azuero Peninsula. The fault has probably been seismically active within the Holocene Epoch as indicated by left-laterally offset streams. The slip rate and seismic potential of this major fault, however, is unknown.

 

Property Geology

 

At Cerro Quema, the silica-pyrite alteration is characterized by a highly fractured, vuggy, locally brecciated rock composed of silica and iron-oxides at the surface. The oxidized rock extends from surface to a depth of up to 150 metres. Beneath the oxidation boundary, pyrite is abundant. With few exceptions, gold mineralization above the cut-off grade is restricted to the silica-rich alteration type within the oxidized and leached cap. On the south side of the La Pava deposit, steeply-dipping chalcopyrite veins appear to be associated with late stage fracturing. In this area, a zone of high grade supergene mineralization (0.5 to 5.0% copper) is present beneath the oxidation surface.

 

Pershimco defined three alteration zones related to the Cerro Quema Project deposits: (i) a silica alteration zone, occurring in the core of the deposit, that contains quartz with very minor alumino-silicate clay minerals; (ii) a silica-clay alteration zone that surrounds the silicic core and is composed of silica with up to 30% fine grained alumino-silicate clay minerals (kaolinite, dickite, pyrophillite). This zone may contain medium to low grade mineralization; (iii) and a clay alteration zone that occurs as a transition between the silica-clay alteration and fresh rock. The clay alteration may contain up to 30% illite/smectite clays that replace original feldspar. This zone is unmineralized.

 

Mineralization

 

In the Cerro Quema Project area, several gold mineralized zones are located along a 15 km long, east-west trend. These zones include the La Pava, Quemita-Quema and La Mesita deposits. The mineralized zones are reported as being hosted in a belt of hornblende-pyrite pyroclastic flows and lavas of dacitic and andesitic composition. The volcanic belt is up to 1.5 km wide and conformably bounded to the north and south by epiclastic submarine sediments. The sequence dips south at 45° to 60° north. The main rock types within the mineralized zones are saprolitic dacitic clay, silicious dacite with various degrees of acid leaching and iron-oxide cemented breccia.

 

The gold and copper mineralization are associated with disseminated pyrite, chalcopyrite, enargite and a stockwork of quartz, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and barite with traces of galena and sphalerite. The presence of vuggy silica, alunite, natro-alunite, and enargite in addition to the hydrothermal alteration pattern is compatible with a high-sulfidation epithermal system.

 

Page 48

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Gold occurs as disseminated submicroscopic grains and as invisible gold within the crystalline structure of pyrite, especially in the advanced silica alteration zone. Strong supergene alteration results in the formation of an oxidation cap or gossan and released the gold contained in the pyrite. The highest grades of gold mineralization are near the surface and decrease toward the lower limit of oxidation.

 

The Cerro Quema deposits are characterized by the presence of widespread hydrothermal alteration that forms concentric halos around mineralization. The presence of vuggy silica, alunite, natro-alunite, and enargite in addition to the hydrothermal alteration pattern are compatible with a high sulphidation epithermal system. The alteration pattern is fault controlled, following E-W trending regional faults.

 

EXPLORATION

 

In 2010 and 2011, Pershimco’s exploration efforts focused on drilling. Lithological and structural mapping, channel sampling and geochemical sampling were also conducted in 2011. In 2012, Geotech Ltd. completed airborne geophysics including radiometric, magnetic and VTEM surveys over the entire property. These surveys identified the mineralized trend and highlighted areas of coincident low magnetic susceptibility with low potassium and low Th/K ratios associated with the La Pava and Quema/Quemita deposits. Additionally, the survey identified two previously unknown corridors to the north of the main trend which highlighted areas of coincident low magnetic susceptibility with low potassium and low Th/K ratios similar to those associated with the La Pava and Quema/Quemita mineralized trend. Following the completion of airborne geophysical studies in early 2012, Pershimco conducted ground IP surveys on various geophysical targets. The first surveys done were over the Quema-Quemita target in late 2012. Surveys were completed over La Pava and a new exploration target, Idaida in 2013. Each survey revealed the presence of large chargeable bodies at depth and show a generally inversed cone geometry. These large chargeable bodies are located over more than 11 km along the Cerro Quema Mineralized Corridor, which has been identified to extend for approximately 15 km within the concessions. A total of 144.6 line km of IP survey work was completed, 66.9 km at Quema/Quemita and Idaida, 57.1 km at La Pelona and 20.6 km at La Pava. The IP geophysics program identified resistivity and chargeability anomalies on all four target areas.

 

In 2014, a regional mapping and surface rock chip sampling program focused on a first-pass reconnaissance investigation over the priority targets identified by the airborne geophysical survey. A total of 12,307 line metres were mapped and a total of 1,204 surface rock chip samples were collected.

 

Pershimco contracted an independent petrology consultant in Australia to conduct petrographic analysis on 70 samples. Samples were selected from various drill holes at La Pava, Quema, Quemita, Idaida and Pelona areas. Samples were selected from the deeper feeder structures at La Pava, the oxide gold zone at La Pava, the supergene enriched copper-gold zones at La Pava, both the oxide and sulphide zones at the Pelona and Idaida projects, as well as the oxide and supergene zones at Quema-Quemita. The aim of the petrographic studies was to gather further information about alteration phases, mineralogy, and mineralization sequence within the various deposits in the concession area. X- ray Diffraction work was conducted was conducted to ascertain clay minerals as well as the composition of ‘sericite’-like white mica and the various sulphates.

 

Drilling

 

Between 1990 and 1994, Cyprus Minerals Company and successor companies completed 4,921.3 metres of core drilling and 9,639 metres of RC drilling on the Cerro Quema Project area. Subsequently, Campbell Resources Inc. drilled a further 1,749.6 metres of core drilling on the La Pava deposit in 1996. Since acquiring the Cerro Quema Project in 2010, to the date of the Cerro Quema Report, Pershimco drilled 16,939 metres of core drilling over 79 holes and 32,728 metres of RC drilling over 330 holes. Drilling extended a mineralized structure along the northern flank of the Quema/Quemita deposit to 750 metres. This structure trends SW-NE and is located 100-200 metres north-northeast of the Quema/Quemita open pit perimeter and southeast of the La Mesita deposit and the El Domo zone. Drilling conducted close to the perimeter of the southwestern and central north sections of the open pit design have intercepted new gold oxide and/or supergene copper mineralization. Supergene copper mineralization was encountered in the western area of the open pit design.

 

Page 49

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Drilling in 2013 focused on Mineral Resource definition at the La Pava and Quema/Quemita deposits as well as investigating geophysical anomalies at new exploration targets Idaida and Pelona. Exploration drilling on the Idaida target has revealed both near surface and deeper mineralized feeder structures analogous to the La Pava and Quema/Quemita deposits.

 

Ten holes drilled on La Pava, located outside or within 10 to 15 metres of the southern and northwestern sides of the open pit design have intercepted significant new gold and copper mineralization.

 

Similar to the drilling at the La Pava deposit, the drilling at the Quema-Quemita deposit increased the overall Mineral Resource as well as identified mineralization outside of the current open pit design. Four drill holes located near the perimeter on the south-western and central north sections of the open pit design have intercepted gold oxide and/or supergene copper mineralization, providing new targets for future resource definition and upgrade drilling.

 

RC drilling was initiated to investigate geophysical anomalies in the new exploration target at Cerro Idaida. Upon completion of the RC drill holes, a diamond drill hole “tail” program was initiated to test for additional copper-gold mineralization within the high sulfidation system at depth. The diamond drill hole ‘tails’ encountered additional high- grade copper (enargite-covellite) mineralization as veinlets, disseminations and breccia matrix fill below the final depth of the RC holes and intercepted a deeper, higher temperature (pyrophyllite-rich) feeder zone containing copper and gold mineralization.

 

Drilling also included: two holes located on the north flank of Cerro Quema, collared to intercept a strong (+40 mV/V) IP chargeability anomaly trending north-northwest; two angle (-80) south directed holes located down slope on the north flank of La Pava about 400 metres north of the summit ridge; and two vertical holes each located to test a strong dual apex high within a large IP chargeability anomaly trending southwest to northeast.

 

Including drilling completed subsequent to the date of the Cerro Quema Report, a total of 98,883 metres have been drilled on the Cerro Quema Project since the first drill hole by Cyprus Minerals in 1990. The majority of the drilling has been focused on the main Mineral Resource areas of La Pava and Quema-Quemita.

 

    RC Drilling     Core Drilling  
Year   Number     Length (metres)     Number     Length (metres)  
Pre-2017     577       50,571       154       31,432  
2017     0       0       91       11,880  
2018     0       0       19       5,000  
Total     577       50,571       264       48,312  

 

 

In 2017, Orla drilled 91 diamond holes for a total of 11,880 metres. Drilling was mainly focused on the Quemita and Cabalito areas with a small number of holes drilled at Chontal and Idaida. To date in 2018, Orla has drilled approximately 5,000 metres in 19 holes in the Caballito and Sombrero areas targeting copper-gold sulphide mineralization.

 

Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification

 

The following outlines the core sampling procedures used by Orla subsequent to the acquisition of the Cerro Quema Project:

 

· Core is delivered from the drill rig to the secure logging area in camp by Orla staff.

 

Page 50

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

· After Geotech, logging the core is photographed and logged by geologists.

 

· Samples are cut where possible at 1.5 metre intervals. In the event there is a loss of core, a change in lithological contact, mineralization or alteration contact, or a change in matrix from oxide to sulphide, the minimum sample size allowed is 0.5 metres and the maximum sample size allowed is 2.0 metres.

 

A rigorous QA/QC program was implemented by Orla. Two QA/QC schedules are used by Orla, for resource definition drilling QA/QC standards and blanks are placed at 1:20 interval, for exploration drilling a 1:40 interval is used. An outline of the QA/QC samples are as follows:

 

· 2% of samples are field duplicates consisting of ¼ core.

 

· 1% of samples are preparation duplicates consisting of a second pulp created from the same coarsely crushed sample.

 

· 1% of samples are assay duplicates, consisting of an analysis of a second split of the same pulp.

 

· 2% of samples are blanks, inserted into the sample stream at the discretion of project geologists, such that they are analyzed sequentially with mineralized material

 

· 2% of the samples are reference standards, 3 different standards ranging from 0.2 to 1.8 g/t Au are currently being used.

 

Samples are prepared in an on-site facility run independently by ALS Minerals. Sample pulps are sent to the ALS Minerals facility in Lima, Peru. All gold results are analysed by ALS Minerals (Au-AA23) using fire assay fusion and an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish. All samples are also analyzed for multi-elements, including silver and copper, using an Aqua Regia (ME-ICP41) method at ALS Laboratories in Peru. Samples with copper values in excess of 1% by ICP analysis are re-run with Cu AA46 aqua regia and atomic absorption analysis.

 

Hole collars are surveyed, and down-hole surveys are taken every hole.

 

Prior to Orla’s acquisition of the Cerro Quema Project, practices with regards to the collection of samples by Pershimco included:

 

(i) Diamond drill core and RC cuttings samples were collected, each approximately one metre. In the event there was a loss of core or cuttings, a change in lithological contact, vein contact or a change in matrix from oxide to sulphide, the minimum sample size allowed was 0.5 metres and the maximum sample size allowed was 1.5 metres.

 

(ii) Lithological contacts, vein contacts and sulphide content were respected with an appropriate sample interval where possible.

 

(iii) A thorough QA/QC program was implemented, which included one field blank and at least one certified reference material, (also referred to as a standard), for every batch of 20 samples sent to the laboratory.

 

The principal lab used was Activation Laboratories (“Actlabs”). Samples were sent to Actlab’s Panama lab for preparation and the resulting pulps were sent to Actlabs in Ancaster, ON, Canada for analysis. Individual samples were entered into the Laboratory Information Management System by Actlabs personnel, dried, and finely crushed. The samples are then returned for a second time to the dryer, and immediately upon their removal from the dryer, were pulverized and riffle-split. Prepared samples were then placed into air-deprived zip lock bags and then into 5-gallon plastic containers, which were sealed and shipped by courier services to Actlabs in Ancaster, Ontario, Canada for assaying. Silver and copper sample tenors were determined using a multi-element ICP method, and gold was determined using fire assay method with atomic absorption finish. Gold values exceeding the 2.5 g/t Au were rerun using fire assay with a gravimetric finish.

 

The Actlabs’ Quality System is accredited to international quality standards through the International Organization for Standardization /International Electrotechnical Commission (“ISO/IEC”) 17025 (ISO/IEC 17025 includes ISO 9001 and ISO 9002 specifications) with CAN-P-1758 (Forensics), CAN-P-1579 (Mineral Analysis) and CAN-P-1585 (Environmental) for specific registered tests by the SCC. The accreditation program includes ongoing audits, which verify the QA system and all applicable registered test methods. Actlabs is also accredited by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference program and Health Canada.

 

Page 51

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

A robust QA/QC program was implemented in 2010, and this program has been maintained throughout the 2011, 2012 and 2013 drill programs since that time. The QA/QC program included the insertion of certified reference materials, field blanks and the preparation of pulp duplicate samples. The results of the 2010-2011 drill programs were previously verified by P&E Mining Consultants Inc. and were found to have passed the strict QA/QC procedures. For the 2012 and 2013 drill programs, a total of six certified reference materials, (also referred to as standards) were used to monitor lab accuracy. Two of the standards were certified for copper-only, and four of them were certified for gold-only. There were 1,725 standards analyzed for gold and 1,155 standards analyzed for copper.

 

DATA VERIFICATION

 

According to the Cerro Quema Report, Mr. Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., a qualified person, visited the Cerro Quema Project most recently on October 2, 2013, (and previously on January 17 and 18, 2012). During the October site visit, Mr. Yassa collected 12 samples from four holes. Samples were collected from taking either a ¼ split of the half core remaining in the core box or taking a split from the RC cuttings. Samples were placed into plastic bags with a unique tag identification and were placed into a larger bag for transport. Mr. Yassa brought the samples to DHL Courier in Chitré, where they were sent to the offices of P&E in Brampton, ON. From there the samples were sent via courier to AGAT Labs in Mississauga, ON for analysis. AGAT has developed and implemented at each of its locations a quality management system designed to ensure the production of consistently reliable data. The system covers all laboratory activities and takes into consideration the requirements of ISO standards. AGAT maintains ISO registrations and accreditations. ISO registration and accreditation provide independent verification that a quality management system is in operation at the location in question. Most AGAT laboratories are registered or are pending registration to ISO 9001:2000.

 

MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING

 

Metallurgical testing of material from the Cerro Quema deposit was completed by the previous owners and Pershimco. The testing included: (i) bottle roll tests that evaluated amenability of the materials to cyanidation; (ii) column leach tests that evaluated the amenability of the materials to conventional heap leaching; and (iii) vat leach tests which evaluated the amenability of the materials to treatment in flooded tanks.

 

Conclusions from metallurgical testing are:

 

· an estimated field gold recovery of 86% for all La Pava material and the low grade Quema/Quemita. Further, it is recommended to discount Quema/Quemita ore recovery at 3% recovery of gold per 1 g/t head grade;

 

· oxide material from La Pava responds very well to cyanide bottle roll and column leaching yielding high gold extractions and low reagent consumptions;

 

· at lower head grades (about 1 g/t of gold and lower), extractions are approximately the same for either La Pava or Quema/Quemita material;

 

· at higher head grades (above 1 g/t of gold), the extractions for La Pava are greater than for Quema/Quemita; and

 

the data show no dependence of gold extraction on crush size for the materials and size ranges tested.

 

Page 52

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

MINERAL RESOURCES

 

For the Cerro Quema Report, Mineral Resource estimation work was carried out by Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., Antoine Yassa P.Geo., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., all independent Qualified Persons in terms of NI 43-101. Mineral Resource modeling and estimation were carried out using the commercially available Gemcom GEMS software program. Open-pit optimization was carried out using the Whittle Four-X Single Element software program. The effective date of the Mineral Resource estimate is June 30, 2014.

 

The Cerro Quema Project Mineral Resource are reported inside an optimized pit shell. The results from the optimized pit shell are used solely for the purpose of reporting Mineral Resources that have reasonable prospects for economic extraction, and the optimization is based on the economic parameters including US$1,500 per ounce gold, 86% oxide Au recovery, 90% sulphide Au recovery, US$2.20 per tonne mining costs, US$6.13 per tonne oxide processing cost, US$12.00 tonne sulphide process cost, US$1.00 per tonne G&A. A cutoff of 0.18 g/t Au was used for oxide mineralization and 0.31 g/t Au for sulphide mineralization. The pit shell was optimized based on Au block grades for oxide zones and gold-equivalent (“AuEq”) block grades for sulphide zones. The gold equivalent block grades were calculated using the formula:

 

Equation 1.0-1

 

AuEq = (Au g/t + (Copper% x 1.6)).

 

Page 53

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Cerro Quema In-Pit Mineral Resources 1, 2,3, 4, 5
La Pava
Zone Category Cutoff
(gold g/t)
Tonnes Gold
(g/t)

Copper

(%)

AuEq
(g/t)
Gold (ounces)
Oxides Measured 0.18 7,052,600 0.82 0.04 NA 184,900
Indicated 0.18 10,896,100 0.57 0.04 NA 201,100
Measured + Indicated 0.18 17,948,700 0.67 0.04 NA 386,000
Inferred 0.18 331,700 0.36 0.03 NA 3,800
  AuEq (ounces)
Sulphides Measured 0.31 802,000 0.44 0.22 0.80 20,600
Indicated 0.31 7,664,900 0.39 0.38 1.00 246,100
Measured + Indicated 0.31 8,466,900 0.39 0.36 0.98 266,700
Inferred 0.31 75,000 0.28 0.2 0.61 1,500
Total             Au and AuEq (oz)
Measured   7,854,600 0.78 0.06 0.81 205,500
Indicated   18,561,000 0.50 0.18 0.75 447,200
Measured + Indicated   26,415,600 0.58 0.14 0.77 652,700
Inferred ---- 406,700 0.35 0.06 0.41 5,300
Quema + Quemita + Mesita
Zone Category Cutoff
(gold g/t)
Tonnes Gold
(g/t)

Copper

(%)

AuEq
(g/t)
Gold (ounces)
Oxides Measured 0.18 0 0 0 NA 0
Indicated 0.18 5,983,700 0.86 0.03 NA 166,400
Measured + Indicated 0.18 5,983,700 0.86 0.03 NA 166,400
Inferred 0.18 335,300 0.38 0.03 NA 4,100
Sulphides             AuEq (ounces)
Measured 0.31 0 0 0 0 0
Indicated 0.31 2,539,000 0.49 0.15 0.73 59,600
Measured + Indicated 0.31 2,539,000 0.49 0.15 0.73 59,600
Inferred 0.31 298,100 0.30 0.17 0.57 5,500
Total             Au and AuEq (oz)
Measured   0 0 0 0.00 0
Indicated   8,522,700 0.75 0.07 0.82 226,000
Measured + Indicated   8,522,700 0.75 0.07 0.82 226,000
Inferred   633,400 0.34 0.10 0.47 9,600

 

Notes:
   
(1) Mineral Resources are reported inside an optimized pit shell. AuEq was calculated using Au + 1.6*copper.
(2) Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
(3) Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
(4) The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Mineral Resources as an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category.
(5) The Mineral Resources were estimated using the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council.

 

Page 54

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

MINERAL RESERVES

 

The Mineral Reserve is that portion of the Mineral Resource that has been identified as mineable within a design pit. The Mineral Reserve estimate incorporates ore mining parameters such as mining recovery and waste rock dilution. The Mineral Reserves form the basis for the Pre-Feasibility Study mine production schedule and mine plans.

 

The Cerro Quema Project mining operation will consist of open-pit mining only with no underground mining component planned, hence, all of the Mineral Reserves are deemed to be open pit reserves. No Inferred Mineral Resources are used in the estimation of the Mineral Reserve. Only oxide resources are used in the estimation of the Mineral Reserve. The Mineral Reserves have been developed in a three-step process: (i) select an optimized open-pit shell to be used as the basis for the pit design; (ii) develop an operational pit design that incorporates benches, detailed pit slope criteria, and truck haulage ramps; and (iii) estimate the in-pit tonnage contained within the operational pit that meets or exceeds the cut-off grade criteria and apply the ore mining parameters (i.e. mining losses and dilution) to that tonnage. The final result is the Mineral Reserve.

 

The Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves are summarized in the table below.

 

Cerro Quema Mineral Reserves 1, 2, 3
La Pava
    Tonnes
(millions)
Gold
(g/t)
Copper
(%)
Gold
(ounces)
  Proven 6.82 0.80 0.04 176,000
Probable 7.40 0.67 0.04 159,000
Proven + Probable 14.22 0.73 0.04 335,000
Quema
    Tonnes
(millions)
Gold
(g/t)
Copper
(%)
Gold
(ounces)
Proven
Probable 5.49 0.86 0.03 153,000
Proven + Probable 5.49 0.86 0.03 153,000
Total
    Tonnes
(millions)
Gold
(g/t)
Copper
(%)
Gold
(ounces)
Proven 6.82 0.80 0.04 176,000
Probable 12.89 0.75 0.03 312,000
Proven + Probable 19.71 0.77 0.04 488,000

 

Notes:
(1) Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
(2) A cut-off grade of 0.21 g/t of gold is used for reporting Mineral Reserves.
(3) Mineral Reserves are estimated at a gold price of US$1,300 per ounce

 

MINING OPERATIONS

 

The mining method proposed for the Cerro Quema Project will be a conventional open-pit mine. A fleet of hydraulic excavators and trucks consisting of 50 tonne rigid frame trucks and 40 tonne articulated trucks will be used to mine the ore and waste materials. The drilling and blasting of both ore and waste rock will be required although some materials will be free-digging. The ore production rate delivered to the heap leach pad area is approximately 3.6 million tonnes per year of silica and fresh rock type ore. Clay type ore will be stockpiled and processed at the end of the mine life since this ore requires a different crushing method and agglomeration. Overall total annual mining rates will range from a high of 7.1 million tonnes of combined ore and waste to a low of 5.5 million tonnes with an average of about 6.4 million tonnes per year. This results in an average total daily mining rate of 18,000 tpd. The total mine life is 5 years in duration, not including one year of pre-production. Ore and waste from the La Pava pit will be hauled to the crusher and Chontal waste dump. At the Quema pit, a trade-off study recommended the use of a conveyor system to transport both ore and waste down the hillside. Waste would be tripped off the conveyor in the Chontal valley and ore would be sent to the primary crushing area.

 

Page 55

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

PROCESSING AND RECOVERY OPERATIONS

 

The Cerro Quema Project will be a 10,000 tpd heap leach facility. Processing at Cerro Quema will be by conventional heap leaching of crushed ore stacked on a single use pad. Gold will be leached from the mineralized material with dilute cyanide solution. Gold will be recovered from solution in a carbon adsorption-desorption-recovery plant to produce doré bars. An apron feeder will deliver the run of mine at a rate of 556 dry tonnes per hour to a vibrating grizzly with 130 mm openings. Grizzly oversize will be crushed by a primary jaw crusher. A secondary screen belt feeder will feed primary crushed rock to a secondary screen. The secondary screen will scalp material at 70 mm. Oversize will be crushed in the secondary cone crusher. Cone crusher product and screen undersize will discharge to the crushed ore stockpile stacker which feeds secondary crushed material to the crushed ore stockpile. The stockpile will be constructed over a subterranean tunnel containing two reclaim belt feeders and the Reclaim Tunnel Conveyor.

 

Pebble lime will be added to the reclaim tunnel conveyor at a nominal rate of 1.6 kg/t material. The crushed material and lime will then be conveyed to the heap for stacking. The ore will be leached using a dilute solution of sodium cyanide applied which will percolate through the material, dissolving gold, and drain by gravity to a pond.

 

Pregnant solution will flow by gravity through the set of five carbon adsorption columns, exiting the last adsorption column as barren solution. The adsorption columns will operate in this fashion until the carbon contained in the lead column achieves the desired precious metal loading and then it will be stripped. Stripping of the gold from the loaded carbon will be accomplished by circulating a heated, dilute caustic and cyanide solution upwards through the carbon bed. The heated solution exits the elution vessel as pregnant eluent. The pregnant eluent flows to the recovery circuit where stripped gold is plated from the pregnant eluent onto mild steel wool cathodes. The mild steel wool cathodes will be removed periodically and treated in the retort furnace which removes all of the water and most of the mercury from the cathodes. The retorted cathodes will then be mixed with fluxes, melted, and poured into doré bars. The doré will then be shipped to an offsite refiner for further processing and sale as fine gold.

 

INFRASTRUCTURE, PERMITTING AND COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES

 

An existing site access road intersects with Via Tonosi approximately 32 km south of Macaracas. The access road runs north approximately 7 km to the location of the platform constructed between Quema and La Pava by Pershimco. Improvements to the existing road will be required and include widening to approximately 9 metres to allow two over-the-road trucks to pass, re-contouring to eliminate grades in excess of 7%, and grading to a ditch on one side for drainage.

 

Raw water is required for dust control, fire water, and process water make-up. Raw water will be supplied by a well located approximately 1.1 km north, north east of the existing platform at an elevation of 190 metres above sea level. Raw water will be stored in a tank located south-southeast of the existing platform near the access road to La Pava at an elevation of 480 metres above sea level.

 

The majority of the diesel fuel used at Cerro Quema Project will be offloaded and stored in a cylindrical horizontal steel tank located on the western end of the existing platform at 423 metres above sea level. The tank will supply fuel for the mine fleet and light vehicles.

 

Page 56

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

During construction, a temporary first aid clinic will be located on the existing platform. A treatment room will be located on the first floor of the Warehouse and Workshop building located near the ADR and process ponds. An emergency vehicle is already available at the existing base camp to transport injured or sick people to the nearest hospital.

 

Electrical power will be supplied from the grid by Distribuidora Electrica de Metro-Oeste (Edemet) at the Substation in Las Tablas, a community about 31 km southeast of Chitré along the Carretera Nacional. Power will be delivered to site using a 34.5 kV power line constructed from Las Tablas to Cerro Quema Project. The mine truck shop and warehouse will be housed in an 895 square metre single-story steel building constructed near the center of the existing platform area. The laboratory will be a 441 square metre single-story steel building constructed adjacent to the mine warehouse and workshop building near the center of the existing platform area. An explosives magazine will be located approximately 700 metres south of the existing pad along the access road. A 760 square metre, single-story concrete block administration building will be constructed near the southern corner of the event pond at the 220 masl elevation level. The building will provide space for employee lockers, treatment room office space, a meeting room and utilities for site managers and their staff. The Refinery will be a 339 square metre block building, adjacent to the adsorption, desorption, and recovery area, housing the electrowinning and smelting equipment and also including an office that will allow security to monitor the electrowinning and smelting processes.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS

 

An ESIA and permits are in place for a previously proposed continuous vat leach operation. However, as the Cerro Quema Project will utilize heap leach processing methods, the Company initiated an update of the ESIA and associated permits based on the new Cerro Quema Project design to meet Panamanian, more specifically the National Authority of the Environment (Autoridad Nacional del Ambiente, known by its acronym ANAM), requirements. Additional studies that were competed to support the ESIA and permits include:

 

· surface water and groundwater flow and quality conditions during dry and wet seasons;

 

· sediment quality samples at selected surface water locations;

 

· aquatic sampling to characterization seasonal and spatial variation; and 

 

· archaeological survey in potentially disturbed areas.

 

To develop a mine at Cerro Quema, a Category 3 ESIA is required from the Ministry of Environment. An application for this permit was submitted in 2016 (subsequent to the date of the Cerro Quema Report). The Ministry has completed the technical evaluation of the ESIA, and the Company believes the Ministry is in the process of preparing the formal resolution to approve it. Timing of approval is presently not known. When drilling commenced in January 2017, it was in an area covered by previously issued permits. Since then, the Ministry of Environment has issued Orla a two year extension to this permit for the purposes of drilling. Additionally, permits to drill have been granted for all new areas applied for. The Company is actively engaged with government officials at various levels in regard to the ESIA and concession renewals.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL MINING FACTORS

 

The acid-base accounting (“ABA”) test results indicate that samples of potential waste rock from the La Pava zone are expected to contain low to very low sulphide by weight percent, however, there is essentially no buffering capacity. The classification of ABA results indicates that most waste rock samples have low potential for acid generation; however, a smaller portion of the waste rock from La Pava is potentially acid generating. The synthetic precipitation leach test results indicate that there is the potential for metal leaching. Geochemical characterization, including kinetic testing, of additional drill core is being completed to confirm the acid generation and metal leaching potential of the waste rock, in particular material associated with the Quemita-Quema ore bodies. The ABA test results suggest that the oxide fraction of the La Pava and Quemita-Quema heap leached ore have some potential for acid generation and all samples of the sulphide fraction of the La Pava heap leached ore are potentially acid generating. Results of the leachate testing indicate that the La Pava leached oxide ore tailings have a low potential for metal leaching. The development of the open pit will be halted within the oxidation zone such that the underling sulphide bearing, and potentially acid generating rock, will not be exposed.

 

Page 57

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

SOCIAL IMPACT

 

In 2013, Pershimco completed a study to describe the socio-economic environment of the communities located within a 12.5 km radius of the Cerro Quema Project and the main urban centres, as well as to identify the local perceptions in regard to Panama’s current state of affairs, the environment, the Cerro Quema Project, and the mining industry in general. Data on demographics, housing and utilities, economics, and health and community well-being were obtained through surveys and secondary sources. The scope of the socio-economic study for the Cerro Quema Project area were expanded during completion of the environmental and social impact assessment. The Company has a Community Relations Department and an active social engagement effort.

 

CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS

 

The required pre-production capital expenditures for the Cerro Quema Project, as summarized below, are considered to have an accuracy of +/-25%. The scope of these costs includes all mining equipment, process facilities, and infrastructure for the Cerro Quema Project. Most costs have been collected in the last quarter of 2013 and the first quarter of 2014 and are considered to be valid for first quarter 2014 US dollars.

 

The planned Cerro Quema Project capital costs are summarized as follows:

 

Mine        
Direct Costs   US$ 10,926,000  
Other Costs   US$ 6,240,000  
Total Pre-Production Mine   US$ 17,166,000  
         
Process        
Direct Costs   US$ 78,010,000  
Indirect Costs   US$ 6,608,000  
Initial Fills, EPCM and Owners Costs   US$ 15,309,0000  
Total Pre-Production Capital Cost   US$ 99,927,000  
         
Total Cerro Quema   US$ 117,093,000  

 

The planned Cerro Quema Project sustaining capital and reclamation costs are summarized as follows:

 

Area        
Leach   US$ 9,906,000  
Mine   US$ 3,527,000  
Closure   US$ 10,381,000  
Total   US$ 23,814,000  

 

Page 58

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The planned Cerro Quema Project average operating costs are summarized as follows:

 

Description        
Mining (owners’ fleet)   US$ 3.30  
Processing (average)   US$ 4.40  
G&A   US$ 0.93  
Total Operating Cost/Tonne Ore   US$ 8.63  
Cash Operating Cost (per ounce of gold)   US$ 402  

 

Based on the estimated production parameters, revenue, capital costs, operating costs, taxes and royalties, a cash flow model was prepared by KCA for the economic analysis of the Cerro Quema Project.

 

The period of analysis of 16 years includes two years of pre-production and investment, six years of production, three years for closure and reclamation and five additional years of monitoring. Other assumptions relied upon in the cash flow model include:

 

· gold price of US$1,275 per ounce; processing rate of 10,000 tonnes per day ore; average gold grade of 0.77 g/t; total average opex of US$8.63 per tonne; total preproduction capex of US$117.1 million; net smelter royalties of 4% (Government); Income Tax Rate of 25%; ITBMS tax of 7%; local and land use taxes of approximately US$81,000 per year; gold recoveries of: 86% for all La Pava material above the cut off head grade and the low grade Quema/Quemita

 

For Quema/Quemita, the following formula should be used to estimate gold recovery at varying head grades greater than 1 g/t Au:

 

% Au = (86% - ((g Au/t -1) x 3%))

 

Page 59

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Cerro Quema Project economics, based on these criteria from the cash flow model, are summarized as follows:

 

Life of Mine Summary – Financial Analysis  
   
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax 33.7%
   
NPV @ 0% (After-Tax) US$152,415,000
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax) US$110,052,200
NPV @ 10% (After-Tax) US$77,997,400
   
Gold Price Assumption (US$/Ounce) US$1,275
Pay Back Period (Years based on After-tax) 2.2
   
Initial Capital Costs  
Pre-Production Initial Capital US$115,929,368
Working Capital US$1,163,664
Total Initial Capital US$117,093,032
   
Future Capital (life of mine) US$23,480,397
   
Operating Costs (Average Life of Mine)  
Mining (Contract and Owner) US$3.30
Processing US$4.40
G&A US$0.93
Total Operating Cost/Tonne Ore US$8.63
Cash Operating Costs (per ounce of gold) US$402
   
Production Data  
Life of Mine 5.3
Mine Throughput (Ore) 10,000
Metallurgical Recovery Au (Avg) 85.8%
Average Annual Gold Production 78,800
Average LOM Strip Ratio (waste: ore) 0.72

 

EXPLORATION UPDATE SUBSEQUENT TO DATE OF CERRO QUEMA REPORT

 

2017 Exploration

 

Exploration at Cerro Quema in 2017 targeted zones of high-sulphidation style alteration that could potentially host additional oxide gold resources. Exploration also tested for sulphide copper-gold mineralization below the level where the rocks are oxidized. There have not been any exploration results subsequent to the Mineral Resource estimate that would materially impact the Mineral Resource estimate used for the pre-feasibility study contained in the Cerro Quema Report.

 

  Page 60  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

A total of 72.7 line km of IP-resistivity and 70.3 line km of magnetic survey were completed by SJ Geophysics of Vancouver, Canada in March through June 2017. Geophysics was completed over five separate exploration targets. In addition, two reconnaissance lines were completed in an area with intrusive-hosted mineralization potential. Resistivity anomalies outlined by the survey were interpreted to be due to silica associated with high sulphidation alteration. Anomalies drilled to date have confirmed this interpretation and drilling to test them continues. One of the reconnaissance lines over the area with potential intrusive hosted mineralization had a strong chargeability anomaly indicating the presence of sulphides. Follow-up work on this anomaly is planned.

 

In early 2017, the Company commenced a drill program to test areas on the property that have potential to host additional Mineral Resources. A contract for diamond drilling was awarded to Energold de Panama S.A., who mobilized 3 man-portable rigs to the site. A total of 11,880 metres in 91 holes were completed in 2017. All results have been provided by the Company in press releases between April 27, 2017 and January 8, 2018.

 

Holes were drilled in the general area of the Quemita Zone (one of two zones that contain the 488,000 ounce Cerro Quema oxide gold Mineral Reserve); areas north of the Quemita zone; the area between the two resource areas (Chontal); and the Idaida and Caballito area to the south of Quemita. Drill targets included resistivity anomalies and areas of alteration that may host undiscovered gold mineralization in oxidized material. Along with testing for new discoveries, the drilling tested potential extensions to the resource zones outlined in the Cerro Quema Report, and possible upgrades to the resources within the pre-feasibility study proposed pits.

 

A new zone at Cabalito comprised of low-arsenic copper-gold mineralization and located 2 km south of Quemita was discovered in 2017.

 

Six holes were drilled in 2017 to obtain material for additional metallurgical testing. (3 at Quemita and 3 at La Pava). Material has been sent to KCA in Reno for column tests at a larger particle size than previous tests conducted on material from the property.

 

2018 Exploration

 

Drilling continued at Cerro Quema in 2018 with one rig currently in operation. A total of 7,536 metres were drilled in 2018 in 27 holes.

 

This work focused on the Caballito copper-gold discovery, and the Sombrero zone which is adjacent to the north of Caballito.

 

The Caballito zone is defined by a 650 to 800-metre-long northwest-southeast trending chargeability anomaly outlined by a 2017 IP survey. It is 350 to 400 metres wide. Highest grade mineralization occurs on the southwest side of the zone and is associated with very low resistivity within the overall chargeability due to very high sulphide content. Widths in excess of 100 metres grading better than 1% copper and associated 0.2 to 0.4 g/t gold have been reported.

 

In 2018, the Company re-examined core from sulphide intercepts below the Quemita oxide gold mineral reserve located 1.2 km to the northwest of Caballito and found indications of Caballito style copper-gold mineralization with low arsenic. Therefore, Orla extended the IP grid northward from the area surveyed in 2017 through this area and completed 25 line-km of new surveying in 2018. Results from the new IP indicated areas with potential for similar mineralization as found at Caballito. Six holes drilled north of Caballito in Sombrero intersected variable zones of alteration, but no high-grade mineralization. Further drilling is planned.

 

The Company completed column testing on material at larger sizes than previously tested. Gold recoveries on material crushed to 150 millimetres were 96% for the La Pava deposit, which contains approximately two thirds of the current mineral reserves, and 91% for the Quemita deposit. Operational recovery estimates are typically de-rated from column test data, but these results compare very favorably to an average operational recovery of 86% in the 2014 Pre-Feasibility Study at a crush size of -70 millimetres. Orla will incorporate the results into an updated process plan and operational recovery estimates that will consider one-stage crushing or run of mine instead of the two-stage crushing modelled in the 2014 PFS.

 

  Page 61  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Cerro Quema

2018 Drill Summary

Dec 31, 2018

 

Hole Area East North Az Dip Depth Intercepts
              From to Width Au g/t Cu %
CQMET-17-154 La Pava 549682 835017 180 -70 147.0 Met Hole (was drilled 40.5 to 147.0 in 2018)
CQDH-18-156 Caballito 554266 834599 90 -60 240.0 46.2 193.8 147.6 0.21 0.33
CQDH-18-157 Caballito 554352 834630 90 -60 247.5 9.0 39.0 30.0 0.73 ox
39.0 52.5 13.5 0.59 sx
75.0 199.5 124.5 0.47 1.54
including 94.5 127.5 33.0 0.49 2.78
CQDH-18-158 Caballito 554157 834600 90 -60 351.0 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-159 Caballito 554320 834475 70 -50 327.0 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-160 Caballito 554472 834626 90 -60 300.0 39.6 125.4 85.8 0.39 1.44
CQDH-18-161 Caballito 554432 834715 90 -60 229.5 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-162 Idaida 554389 834902 90 -60 300.0 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-163 Caballito 554280 834703 90 -60 300.0 4.5 18.0 13.5 0.45 ox
42.5 190.2 147.7 0.28 1.25
including 145.0 187.0 42.0 0.36 3.12
CQDH-18-164 Idaida 554192 834931 90 -60 232.5 0.0 33.0 33.0 0.81 ox
52.5 96.3 43.8 0.36 ox
96.3 122.0 25.7 0.52 1.96
129.5 144.0 14.5 0.35 0.72
CQDH-18-165 Caballito 554642 834604 90 -60 231.0 36.0 45.0 9.0 0.92 0.19
56.7 78.8 22.1 0.27 0.52
CQDH-18-166 Caballito 554650 834850 250 -65 285.0 56.8 71.0 14.2 0.31 0.32
80.8 146.0 65.2 0.30 0.83
including 81.3 93.0 11.7 0.28 2.38
CQDH-18-167 Idaida 554155 835144 90 -50 295.5 134.5 236.2 101.7 0.10 0.27
        including 223.5 234.0 10.5 0.16 0.76
CQDH-18-168 Idaida 554151 835146 225 -50 250.5 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-169 Idaida 554153 835145 60 -50 300.0 128.0 262.0 134.0 0.14 0.62
CQDH-18-170 Idaida 554498 834911 90 -45 232.5 25.5 54.0 28.5 0.30 0.30
CQDH-18-171 Idaida 554498 834911 90 -70 201.0 79.9 84.5 4.6 0.12 0.94
130.5 135.0 4.5 0.13 1.07
CQDH-18-172 Sombrero 553620 835714 90 -65 243.0 No significant intercepts

 

  Page 62  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Hole Area East North Az Dip Depth Intercepts
              From to Width Au g/t Cu %
CQDH-18-173 Sombrero 554051 835691 325 -60 235.5 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-174 Sombrero 553989 835621 270 -60 120.0 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-175 Sombrero 553940 835494 270 -80 360.0 22.0 35.4 13.4 2.11 0.07
CQDH-18-176 Sombrero 553934 835502 90 -65 177.0 24.0 43.5 19.5 0.59 0.06
CQDH-18-177 Sombrero 554223 834801 90 -60 274.5 0.0 14.6 14.6 0.25  
136.6 196.6 60.0 0.09 0.10
CQDH-18-178 Caballito 554283 834706 270 -75 210.0 67.0 119.5 52.5 0.30 0.84
including 68.0 90.3 22.3 0.34 1.48
CQDH-18-179 Idaida 554140 835047 90 -65 454.5 0.0 6.1 6.1 0.30  
68.7 129.8 61.1 0.55 1.34
including 103.5 128.3 24.8 0.89 2.91
CQDH-18-180 Idaida 554385 834900 270 -55 289.5 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-181 Idaida 554370 835164 270 -70 414.0 104.1 114.5 10.4 0.13 0.92
140.5 297.0 156.5 0.15 0.69
including 140.5 151.5 11.0 0.23 1.99
including 162.0 207.7 45.7 0.24 1.30
including 245.9 255.3 9.4 0.20 1.13
CQDH-18-182 Idaida 554174 835299 90 -65 328.5 No significant intercepts
Total 2018 drilling (metres)         7,536.0  

 

Notes:
(1) All gold and copper values are uncut except for hole CQDH-18-160 where a 7.0% and a 36.0% assay were cut to 3.4% (third highest assay).
(2) Widths are shown as intercepted widths.
(3) Drill results were reviewed and approved by Hans Smit, P.Geo., Chief Operating Officer at Orla.
(4) Data as of December 31, 2018.
(5) ox = oxide.

 

OUTLOOK/FUTURE PLANS

 

The Company has an ongoing environmental management plan that includes installing and maintaining sediment dams, reforestation of previously disturbed areas and active sediment control activities. Baseline surface water quality sampling and groundwater level measurements are also ongoing.

 

The Company has an active community relations program that includes providing hot lunches to 5 to 15-year-old children studying in the 12 schools located within a 15 km radius of the Project. We also provide support for various local amateur sports teams, a youth orchestra, local fairs, and cultural events.

 

There were no notable exploration activities at Cerro Quema in 2019. In January 2019, the total workforce at Cerro Quema was reduced from 77 to 36 employees in an effort to reduce the day-to-day expenditures at the project.

 

In 2020, the Company plans to update the Cerro Quema pre-feasibility study on the oxide heap leach gold project initially completed in 2014. This will include updated mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates. In addition to the work on oxide mineralization, the Company will continue to advance exploration of the Caballito copper-gold sulphide discovery. This style of mineralization, identified in 2018, presents potential value to the project in addition to the current heap-leach oxide gold project. In addition to the 1.2 km long trend north of Caballito through to Quemita, the Pelona area in the eastern part of the project provides extensive target areas for additional Caballito-style mineralization.

 

  Page 63  

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

RISK FACTORS

 

In addition to the usual risks associated with an investment in a mineral exploration and development company, the Company believes that, in particular, the risk factors set out below should be considered. It should be noted that this list is not exhaustive and that other risk factors may apply. If any of these risks materialize into actual events or circumstances or other possible additional risks and uncertainties of which the Directors of the Company are currently unaware or which they consider not to be material in relation to the Company’s business, actually occur, the Company’s assets, liabilities, financial condition, results of operations (including future results of operations), business and business prospects could be materially adversely affected. In such circumstances, the price of the Company’s securities could decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment. An investment in the Company may not be suitable for all investors.

 

FINANCING RISKS

 

The Company has limited financial resources, no history of mineral production, operations or source of operating cash flow and continues to experience losses from operations, a trend the Company expects to continue. The exploration and development of the Company’s properties, including continuing exploration, will require additional financing. Historically, the Company has been financed through the issuance of Common Shares and other equity securities. Although Orla has been successful in the past in obtaining financing, the Company has limited financial resources. The Company has no assurance that additional funding will be available to it in the future to fulfill the Company’s existing obligations or further exploration and development and, if obtained, on terms favourable to the Company. The ability of the Company to arrange additional financing in the future will depend, in part, on prevailing capital market conditions as well as the business performance of the Company.

 

The most likely source of future financing presently available to the Company is through the sale of additional Common Shares, which would mean that each existing shareholder would own a smaller percentage of the Common Shares then outstanding. Alternatively, the Company may rely on debt financing and assume debt obligations that require it to make interest and capital payments. Also, the Company may issue or grant warrants or options in the future pursuant to which additional Common Shares may be issued. Exercise of such warrants or options will result in dilution of equity ownership to the Company’s existing shareholders.

 

Failure to obtain required financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of its anticipated activities in the coming years and could cause the Company to forfeit its interests in some or all of the Company’s properties or to reduce or terminate the Company’s operations. Failure to obtain required financing would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

UNCERTAINTY IN THE ESTIMATION OF MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES

 

The figures for Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources contained in this AIF are estimates only and no assurance can be given that the anticipated tonnages and grades will be achieved, that the indicated level of recovery will be realized or that Mineral Reserves or Mineral Resources will be mined or processed profitably. The Company cannot give any assurance that such estimates will be achieved. Failure to achieve such estimates could have an adverse impact on the Company’s future cash flows, profitability, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Until a deposit is actually mined and processed, the quantity of metal and grades must be considered as estimates only. Actual Mineral Reserves or Mineral Resources may not conform to geological, metallurgical, or other expectations, and the volume and grade of ore recovered may differ from estimated levels. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, including many factors beyond the Company’s control. Such estimation is a subjective process, and the accuracy of any Mineral Reserve or Mineral Resource estimate is a function of the quantity and quality of available data and of the assumptions made and judgments used in engineering and geological interpretation. It is inherently impossible to have full knowledge of particular geologic structures, faults, voids, intrusions, natural variations in and within rock types and other occurrences. Failure to identify such occurrences in the Company’s assessment of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Page 64

 

  

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Short-term operating factors relating to the Mineral Reserves, such as the need for orderly development of the ore bodies or the processing of new or different ore grades, may cause the mining operation to be unprofitable in any particular accounting period. In addition, there can be no assurance that gold recoveries in small scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in larger scale tests under on-site conditions or during production. Fluctuations in gold and base or other precious metals prices, results of drilling, metallurgical testing and production and the evaluation of studies, reports and plans subsequent to the date of any estimate may result in a revision of estimates from time to time or may render the estimates uneconomic to exploit. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve data is not indicative of future results of operations. Estimated Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves for the Company’s properties are evaluated from time to time and may require adjustments or downward revisions based upon further exploration or development work, geological interpretation, drilling results, metal prices or actual production experience. Any material reductions in estimates could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

The category of Inferred Mineral Resource is often the least reliable Mineral Resource category and is subject to the most variability. Due to the uncertainty which may attach to Inferred Mineral Resources, there is no assurance that Inferred Mineral Resources will be upgraded to Proven Mineral Reserves and Probable Mineral Reserves as a result of continued exploration. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

 

The activities of the Company are subject to environmental regulations promulgated by government agencies from time to time. Environmental legislation generally provides for restrictions and prohibitions on spills, releases or emissions of various substances produced in association with certain mining industry operations, such as seepage from tailings disposal areas, which would result in environmental pollution. A breach of such legislation may result in imposition of fines and penalties. In addition, certain types of operations require the submission and approval of environmental impact assessments. Environmental legislation is evolving to stricter standards, and enforcement, fines and penalties for noncompliance are more stringent. Environmental assessments of proposed projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and directors, officers, and employees. The cost of compliance with changes in governmental regulations has a potential to reduce the profitability of operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties in which the Company holds its interests or on properties that will be acquired which are unknown to the Company at present and which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of those properties.

 

The Company’s current or future activities, including exploration and development activities and operations of the Company require licenses, permits or other approvals from various governmental authorities and activities are and will be governed by laws and regulations governing exploration, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, safety, mine permitting and other matters. Companies engaged in exploration and development activities generally experience increased costs and delays as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits. There can be no assurance that all permits that the Company may require for exploration and development will be obtainable on reasonable terms or on a timely basis, or that such laws and regulations would not have an adverse effect on any project that the Company may undertake. The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with all material laws and regulations that currently apply to its activities and that it does not currently have any material environmental obligations. However, there may be unforeseen environmental liabilities resulting from exploration, development and/or mining activities and these may be costly to remedy.

 

The Company does not maintain insurance against all environmental risks. As a result, any claims against the Company may result in liabilities that could have a significant adverse effect on the operations and financial condition of the Company.

 

Page 65

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in exploration and development operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the exploration and development activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations and, in particular, environmental laws.

 

Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of exploration companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on the Company and cause increases in expenditures and costs or require abandonment or delays in developing new mining properties.

 

The Company cannot give any assurances that breaches of environmental laws (whether inadvertent or not) or environmental pollution will not materially or adversely affect its financial condition. There is no assurance that future changes to environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely affect the Company.

 

FOREIGN COUNTRY AND POLITICAL RISK

 

The Company’s principal mineral properties are located in Mexico and Panama. The Company is subject to certain risks as a result of conducting foreign operations, including, but not limited to: currency fluctuations; possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mineral titles or other mineral rights; opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations; government regulations relating to the mining industry; renegotiation, cancellation or forced modification of existing contracts; expropriation or nationalization of property; changes in laws or policies or increasing legal and regulatory requirements including those relating to taxation, royalties, imports, exports, duties, currency, or other claims by government entities, including retroactive claims and/or changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices; uncertain political and economic environments; war, terrorism, narco-terrorist actions or activities, sabotage and civil disturbances; delays in obtaining or the inability to obtain or maintain necessary governmental or similar permits or to operate in accordance with such permits or regulatory requirements; currency fluctuations; import and export regulations, including restrictions on the export of gold or other minerals; limitations on the repatriation of earnings; and increased financing costs. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its business.

 

The introduction of new tax laws, regulations or rules, or changes to, or differing interpretation of, or application of, existing tax laws, regulations, or rules in any of the countries in which the Company currently conducts business or in the future may conduct business, could result in an increase in taxes, or other governmental charges, duties, or impositions. No assurance can be given that new tax laws, rules or regulations will not be enacted or that existing tax laws will not be changed, interpreted, or applied in a manner that could result in the Company being subject to additional taxation or that could otherwise have a material adverse effect on us.

 

One of the Company’s principal mineral properties is located in Panama. Panama remains a developing country. If the economy of Panama fails to continue growth or suffers a recession, it may have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations in that country. The Company does not carry political risk insurance.

 

Although the Company believes that its exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations, new rules and regulations may be enacted, and existing rules and regulations may be applied in a manner that could limit or curtail production or development of the Company’s properties. Amendments to current laws and regulations governing the operations and activities of the Company or more stringent implementation thereof could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

CONCESSIONS RISKS

 

The original 20-year term for the concessions at the Cerro Quema Project expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). The Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. The Company believes it has complied with all legal requirements in relation to the concessions. On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications were received, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal of the concessions. The Company has also received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. A permit was received on May 8, 2018 to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018 two permits to use water for drilling were received. An existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current resources was extended for two years in May 2018. On February 11, 2019 a new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions was received. Furthermore, the Panamanian Ministry of Commerce and Industry accepted the most recent annual report for the concessions which includes a work plan for 2019. The 2019 concessions tax payment was accepted in February 2019. All drill permits are currently active. General elections were held in Panama in May 2019, which resulted in a change in federal government effective July 1, 2019. Subsequent to this, two permits allowing temporary use of water for exploration drilling were received on November 12, 2019 and an additional two temporary water permits were received on January 13, 2020. On February 3, 2020, the annual concession payments were made and accepted.

 

Page 66

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

As of the date of this AIF, final concession renewals have not been received. There is no assurance that the Company will receive the extensions or receive them within a reasonable time period. Failure to receive the extensions would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

ESIA PERMIT

 

To develop a mine at Cerro Quema, a Category 3 ESIA is required from the Ministry of Environment. An application for this permit was submitted in 2016. The Company is actively engaged with government officials at various levels in regard to the ESIA and concession renewals. It is reviewing all options including ceasing site activities until such time as approval of the renewals and the permits is finalized. There is no assurance that the Company will receive the various approvals, including the modification to the ESIA, or receive them within a reasonable time period. Failure to receive the ESIA would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

PERMITTING RISKS

 

The Company’s operations in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates are subject to receiving and maintaining permits (including environmental permits) from appropriate governmental authorities. Furthermore, prior to any development on any of its properties, the Company must receive permits from appropriate governmental authorities. The Company can provide no assurance that necessary permits will be obtained, that previously issued permits will not be suspended for a variety of reasons, including through government or court action, or that delays will not occur in connection with obtaining all necessary permits, renewals of permits for existing operations, or additional permits for any possible future changes to operations, or additional permits associated with new legislation. The Company can provide no assurance that it will continue to hold or obtain, if required to, all permits necessary to develop or continue operating at any particular site, which would materially adversely affect its operations.

 

EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT RISKS

 

The business of exploring for minerals and mining involves a high degree of risk. The operations of the Company may be disrupted by a variety of risks and hazards normally encountered in the exploration, development and production of precious metals, including, without limitation, unusual and unexpected geologic formations, seismic activity, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to, or destruction of, mines and other producing facilities, personal injury or loss of life and damage to tailings dams, property, and environmental damage, all of which may result in possible legal liability. The occurrence of any of these events could result in a prolonged interruption of the Company’s activities that would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Further, the Company may be subject to liability or sustain losses in relation to certain risks and hazards against which it cannot insure or for which it may elect not to insure. The occurrence of operational risks and/or a shortfall or lack of insurance coverage could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

Page 67

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Even when mineralization is discovered, it may take several years until production is possible, during which time the economic feasibility of production may change. Major expenses may be required to locate and establish Mineral Reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the exploration or development programs planned by Orla will result in a profitable commercial mining operation. Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, some of which are: the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, metal prices that are highly cyclical, and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital. There is no certainty that the expenditures made towards the search and evaluation of mineral deposits will result in discoveries or development of commercial quantities of ore. Development projects have no operating history upon which to base estimates of future capital and operating costs. For development projects, Mineral Resource estimates and estimates of operating costs are, to a large extent, based upon the interpretation of geologic data obtained from drill holes and other sampling techniques, and feasibility studies, which derive estimates of capital and operating costs based upon anticipated tonnage and grades of ore to be mined and processed, ground conditions, the configuration of the ore body, expected recovery rates of minerals from ore, estimated operating costs, and other factors. As a result, actual production, cash operating costs and economic returns could differ significantly from those estimated. It is not unusual for new mining operations to experience problems during the start-up phase, and delays in the commencement of production can often occur.

 

THE CAMINO ROJO PROJECT MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE ASSUMES THAT THE COMPANY CAN ACCESS MINERAL TITLES AND LANDS THAT ARE NOT CONTROLLED BY THE COMPANY

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s Mineral Resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by the Adjacent Owner and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the Mineral Resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the Mineral Resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Camino Rojo Report, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full Mineral Resource. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full Mineral Resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The Camino Rojo Report is based on only a portion of the total Mineral Resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the proposed mine plan in the Camino Rojo Report.

 

Page 68

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATIONS FOR THE CAMINO ROJO PROJECT ARE ONLY ESTIMATES AND RELY ON CERTAIN ASSUMPTIONS

 

The estimation of Mineral Resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

In particular, the estimation of Mineral Resources for the Camino Rojo Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the Mineral Resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached.

 

Although all mineralization included in the Company’s Mineral Resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the Mineral Resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in Mineral Resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

SURFACE RIGHTS

 

There are three ejido communities in the vicinity of the main area of drilling at the Camino Rojo Project and other ejido lands cover most of the rest of the property. The lands that would be required by the Company for a potential open pit mine and heap leach facility are subject to an expropriation agreement between the Company and the San Tiburcio Ejido. For exploration activities, the Company enters into temporary occupation agreements with the ejido communities, which allow the Company to use the surface of the lands for its mining activities for a set period of time. In Mexico, mining rights that are covered under a concession do not include direct ownership or possession rights over the surface, or surface access, and at any particular time the Company may be involved in negotiations with various ejido communities to enter into new temporary occupation agreements or other surface access agreements or amend existing agreements. Failure to reach new agreements or disputes regarding existing agreements may cause, blockades, suspension of operations, delays to projects, and on occasion, may lead to legal disputes. Any such failure to reach new agreements or disputes regarding existing agreements may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. The Company currently owns all surface rights required for exploration and development of the Cerro Quema project.

 

PRODUCTION ESTIMATES

 

The Company has Mineral Reserve estimations for its existing Cerro Quema and Camino Rojo projects and such estimates are based on a pre-feasibility study. The Company cannot give any assurance that such estimates will be achieved. Failure to achieve such estimates could have an adverse impact on the Company’s future cash flows, profitability, results of operations and financial condition. The realization of estimates is dependent on, among other things, the accuracy of Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates, the accuracy of assumptions regarding grades and recovery rates, ground conditions (including hydrology), the physical characteristics of deposits, the presence or absence of particular metallurgical characteristics, and the accuracy of the estimated rates and costs of mining, haulage, and processing. Actual production may vary from estimates for a variety of reasons, including the actual ore mined varying from estimates of grade or tonnage; dilution and metallurgical and other characteristics (whether based on representative samples of ore or not); short-term operating factors such as the need for sequential development of ore bodies; mine failures or slope failures; industrial accidents; natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions, floods, droughts, rock slides and earthquakes; encountering unusual or unexpected geological conditions; changes in power costs and potential power shortages; shortages of principal supplies needed for mining operations, including explosives, fuels, chemical reagents, water, equipment parts and lubricants; plant and equipment failure; the inability to process certain types of ores; labour shortages or strikes; and restrictions or regulations imposed by government agencies or other changes in the regulatory environment. Such occurrences could also result in damage to mineral properties or mines, interruptions in production, injury or death to persons, damage to property of the Company or others, monetary losses, and legal liabilities in addition to adversely affecting mineral production.

 

Page 69

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

COST ESTIMATES

 

Capital and operating cost estimates discussed herein may not prove accurate. Capital and operating cost estimates are based on the interpretation of geological data, feasibility studies, anticipated climatic conditions, market conditions for required products and services, and other factors and assumptions regarding foreign exchange currency rates. Any of the following events could affect the ultimate accuracy of such estimate: unanticipated changes in grade and tonnage of ore to be mined and processed; incorrect data on which engineering assumptions are made; delay in construction schedules, unanticipated transportation costs; the accuracy of major equipment and construction cost estimates; labour negotiations; changes in government regulation (including regulations regarding prices, cost of consumables, royalties, duties, taxes, permitting and restrictions on production quotas on exportation of minerals); and title claims. Changes in the Company’s anticipated production costs could have a major impact on any future profitability. Changes in costs of the Company’s anticipated mining and processing operations could occur as a result of unforeseen events, including international and local economic and political events, a change in commodity prices, increased costs (including oil, steel, and diesel) and scarcity of labour, and could result in changes in profitability or Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates. Many of these factors may be beyond the Company’s control. There is no assurance that actual costs will not exceed such estimates. Exceeding cost estimates could have an adverse impact on the Company’s future results of operations or financial condition.

 

METAL PRICES

 

The Company’s long-term viability depends, in large part, upon the market price of gold and silver. Market price fluctuations of gold could adversely affect the profitability of the Company’s operations and lead to impairments and write downs of mineral properties. Metal prices have fluctuated widely, particularly in recent years. The marketability of metals is also affected by numerous other factors beyond the control of the Company, including government regulations relating to price, royalties, global consumption patterns, supply of, and demand for, metals, speculative activities, allowable production and importing and exporting of minerals, the effect of which cannot accurately be predicted. There can be no assurance that the price of any commodities will be such that any of the properties in which the Company has an interest may be mined at a profit.

 

Declining metal prices can also impact operations by requiring a reassessment of the feasibility of a particular project. Even if a project is ultimately determined to be economically viable, the need to conduct such a reassessment may cause substantial delays and/or may interrupt operations until the reassessment can be completed, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

 

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CONDITIONS

 

Market events and conditions, including the disruptions in the international credit markets and other financial systems, along with political instability, falling currency prices expressed in United States dollars, the uncertainty surrounding global supply chain and the critical measures implemented by governments globally related to the recent spread of diseases have resulted in commodity prices remaining volatile. These conditions have also caused fear and a loss of confidence in global credit markets, resulting in a climate of greater volatility, tighter regulations, less liquidity, widening credit spreads, increased credit losses and tighter credit conditions. Notwithstanding various actions by governments, concerns about the general condition of the capital markets, financial instruments, banks and investment banks, insurers and other financial institutions have caused the broader credit markets to be volatile and interest rates to remain at historical lows. These events are illustrative of the effect that events beyond the Company’s control may have on commodity prices; demand for metals, including gold and silver; availability of credit; investor confidence; and general financial market liquidity, all of which may adversely affect the Company’s business.

 

These factors may impact the ability of the Company to obtain equity or debt financing in the future and, if obtained, on terms favourable to the Company. Increased levels of volatility and market turmoil can adversely impact the Company’s operations and the value, and the price of the Common Shares could be adversely affected.

 

Page 70

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

THREAT OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES OR OUTBREAKS OF VIRUSES

 

Global markets have been adversely impacted by emerging infectious diseases and/or the threat of outbreaks of viruses, other contagions or epidemic diseases, including the novel COVID-19, and many industries, including the mining industry have been impacted. The outbreak has led to a widespread crisis that is adversely affecting the economies and financial markets of many countries. If increased levels of volatility continue, or in the event of a rapid destabilization of global economic conditions, there may be an adverse effect on commodity prices, demand for metals, availability of equity or credit, investor confidence, and general financial market liquidity, all of which may adversely affect the Company’s business and the market price of the Company’s securities. In addition, there may not be an adequate response to emerging infectious diseases. There are potentially significant economic and social impacts, including labour shortages and shutdowns, delays and disruption in supply chains, social unrest, government or regulatory actions or inactions, including permanent changes in taxation or policies, decreased demand or the inability to sell and deliver concentrates and resulting commodities, declines in the price of commodities, delays in permitting or approvals, governmental disruptions or other unknown but potentially significant impacts. At this time, we cannot accurately predict what impacts there will be or what effects these conditions will have on the business, including those uncertainties relating to the ultimate geographic spread, the duration of the outbreak, and the length of restrictions or responses that have been or may be imposed by the governments. Any outbreak or threat of an outbreak of a contagious or epidemic disease could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its ability to finance, its business and financial results and the market price of its securities.

 

UNINSURED RISKS

 

Exploration, development, and production operations on mineral properties involve numerous risks, including but not limited to unexpected or unusual geological operating conditions, rock bursts, cave-ins, fires, floods, landslides, earthquakes and other environmental occurrences, risks relating to the storage and shipment of precious metal concentrates or doré bars, and political and social instability. Such occurrences could result in damage to mineral properties, damage to underground development, damage to production facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage to the Company’s properties or the properties of others, delays in the ability to undertake exploration, monetary losses, and possible legal liability. Should such liabilities arise, they could reduce or eliminate future profitability and result in increasing costs and a decline in the value of the securities of the Company.

 

Although the Company maintains insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers reasonable, its insurance policies do not cover all the potential risks associated with a mining company’s operations. The Company may also be unable to maintain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance coverage may not continue to be available or may not be adequate to cover any resulting liability. Moreover, insurance against risks such as environmental pollution or other hazards as a result of exploration and production is not always available to the Company or to other companies in the mining industry on acceptable terms. The Company might also become subject to liability for pollution or other hazards which it may not be insured against or which the Company may elect not to insure against because of premium costs or other reasons. The Company does not currently maintain insurance against political risks, underground development risks, production facilities risks, business interruption or loss of profits, theft of doré bars, the economic value to re-create core samples, environmental risks, and other risks. Furthermore, insurance limits currently in place may not be sufficient to cover losses arising from insured events. Losses from any of the above events may cause the Company to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect upon its financial performance and results of operations.

 

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

 

The mineral exploration business is competitive in all of its phases. The Company competes with numerous other companies and individuals, including competitors with greater financial, technical, and other resources than the Company, in the search for and acquisition of exploration and development rights on desirable mineral properties, for capital to finance its activities and in the recruitment and retention of qualified employees. There is no assurance that the Company will continue to be able to compete successfully with its competitors in acquiring exploration and development rights, financing, or recruiting and retaining employees.

 

Page 71

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

TITLE MATTERS

 

The acquisition of title to mineral tenures in Mexico and Panama is a detailed and time-consuming process. Although the Company has diligently investigated title to all mineral tenures and, to the best of its knowledge, title to all of its properties is in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to any of the Company’s mineral properties and any of the Company’s properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected encumbrances or defects or governmental actions. Title to the Company’s properties may also be affected by undisclosed and undetected defects.

 

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

 

The Company’s Directors and officers may serve as directors or officers of other companies or have significant shareholdings in other resource companies and, to the extent that such other companies may participate in ventures in which the Company may participate, the Directors of the Company may have a conflict of interest in negotiating and concluding terms respecting the extent of such participation. In the event that such a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the Company’s Directors, a Director who has such a conflict will abstain from voting for or against the approval of such participation or such terms. In accordance with the laws of British Columbia, the Directors of the Company are required to act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Company.

 

COMPLIANCE WITH ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS

 

The Company is subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of the United States of America, and similar laws in any country in which the Company conducts business. In general, these laws prohibit a company and its employees and intermediaries from bribing or making other prohibited payments to foreign officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. In recent years, there has been a general increase in both the frequency of enforcement and the severity of penalties under such laws, resulting in greater scrutiny and punishment to companies convicted of violating anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. Furthermore, a company may be found liable for violations by not only its employees, but also by its contractors and third-party agents.

 

The Company’s Camino Rojo Project is located in Mexico and the Cerro Quema Project is located in Panama, both of which countries which are perceived as having fairly high levels of corruption. Orla cannot predict the nature, scope, or effect of future anti-corruption regulatory requirements to which the Company’s operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

 

Failure to comply with the applicable legislation and other similar foreign laws could expose the Company and/or its senior management to civil and/or criminal penalties, other sanctions and remedial measures, legal expenses, and reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the applicable anti-corruption legislation by Canadian or foreign authorities could also have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

As a consequence of these legal and regulatory requirements, the Company has instituted policies with regard to business ethics, which have been designed to ensure that Orla and its employees comply with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that such efforts have been and will be completely effective in ensuring the Company’s compliance, and the compliance of its employees, consultants, contractors, and other agents, with all applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations.

 

SHARE PRICE FLUCTUATIONS

 

The Common Shares are listed and posted for trading on the TSX. An investment in the Company’s securities is highly speculative. In recent years, the securities markets have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market price of securities of many companies, particularly those considered exploration, or development-stage companies such as the Company, have experienced wide fluctuations in price which have not necessarily been related to the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. There can be no assurance that continual fluctuations in price will not occur.

 

Page 72

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

TAX MATTERS

 

The Company is subject to income taxes and other taxes in a variety of jurisdictions and the Company’s tax structure is subject to review by both Canadian and foreign taxation authorities. The Company’s taxes are affected by a number of factors, some of which are outside of its control, including the application and interpretation of the relevant tax laws and treaties. If the Company’s filing position were to be challenged for whatever reason, this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS

 

The Company’s operations in Mexico and Panama make it subject to foreign currency fluctuations and such fluctuations may materially affect the Company’s financial position and results. The Company reports its financial results in Canadian dollars with the majority of transactions denominated in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, and Mexican pesos. As the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar and Mexican peso fluctuate against the Canadian dollar, the Company will experience foreign exchange gains or losses. The Company does not use an active hedging strategy to reduce the risk associated with currency fluctuations but may decide to do so in the future.

 

LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY

 

The Company has no history of generating operating revenues or profits. The Company expects to continue to incur losses unless and until such time as it develops its properties and commences operations on its properties. The development of the properties will require the commitment of substantial financial resources. The amount and timing of expenditures will depend on a number of factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, including the progress of ongoing exploration, studies and development, the results of consultant analysis and recommendations, and the execution of any joint venture agreements with strategic parties, if any. There can be no assurance that the Company will generate operating revenues or profits in the future.

 

NEGATIVE OPERATING CASH FLOW

 

The Company is an exploration stage company and has not generated cash flow from operations. The Company is devoting significant resources to the development of the Camino Rojo Project, the Cerro Quema Project and to actively pursue exploration and development opportunities, however, there can be no assurance that it will generate positive cash flow from operations in the future. The Company expects to continue to incur negative consolidated operating cash flow and losses until such time as it achieves commercial production at a particular project. The Company currently has negative cash flow from operating activities.

 

LITIGATION RISK

 

All industries, including the mining industry, are subject to legal claims, with and without merit. Defence and settlement costs of legal claims can be substantial, even with respect to claims that have no merit. Due to the inherent uncertainty of the litigation and dispute resolution process, the litigation process could take away from management time and efforts and the resolution of any particular legal proceeding to which the Company may become subject could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or the Company’s property development.

 

NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION INTERVENTION

 

The Company’s relationship with the communities in which it operates is critical to ensure the future success of its existing operations and the construction and development of its projects. Non-governmental organizations may create or inflame public unrest and anti-mining sentiment among the inhabitants in areas of mineral development. Such organizations can be involved, with financial assistance from various groups, in mobilizing sufficient local anti-mining sentiment to prevent the issuance of required permits for the development of mineral projects of other companies. While the Company is committed to operating in a socially responsible manner, there is no guarantee that the Company’s efforts in this respect will mitigate this potential risk.

 

Page 73

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

OUTSIDE CONTRACTOR RISKS

 

It is common for certain aspects of mining operations, such as drilling, blasting and underground development, to be conducted by outside contractors. As a result, the Company is subject to a number of risks, including: reduced control over the aspects of the tasks that are the responsibility of the contractors; failure of the contractors to perform under their agreements with the Company; inability to replace the contractors if their contracts are terminated; interruption of services in the event that the contractors cease operations due to insolvency or other unforeseen events; failure of the contractors to comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements; and failure of the contractors to properly manage their workforce resulting in labour unrest or other employment issues.

 

UNRELIABLE HISTORICAL DATA

 

The Company has compiled technical data in respect of the Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema projects, some of which was not prepared by the Company. While the data represents a useful resource for the Company, much of it must be verified by the Company before being relied upon in formulating exploration programs.

 

UNKNOWN LIABILITIES IN CONNECTION WITH ACQUISITIONS

 

As part of the Company’s acquisitions, the Company has assumed certain liabilities and risks. While the Company conducted thorough due diligence in connection with such acquisitions, there may be liabilities or risks that the Company failed, or was unable, to discover in the course of performing the due diligence investigations or for which the Company was not indemnified. Any such liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

 

ACQUISITIONS AND INTEGRATION

 

From time to time, the Company examines opportunities to acquire additional mining assets and businesses. Any acquisition that the Company may choose to complete may be of a significant size, may change the scale of the Company’s business and operations, and may expose the Company to new geographic, political, operating, financial and geological risks. The Company’s success in its acquisition activities depends on its ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates, negotiate acceptable terms for any such acquisition, and integrate the acquired operations successfully with those of the Company. Any acquisitions would be accompanied by risks. For example, there may be a significant change in commodity prices after the Company has committed to complete the transaction and established the purchase price or exchange ratio; a material property may prove to be below expectations; the Company may have difficulty integrating and assimilating the operations and personnel of any acquired companies, realizing anticipated synergies and maximizing the financial and strategic position of the combined enterprise, and maintaining uniform standards, policies and controls across the organization; the integration of the acquired business or assets may disrupt the Company’s ongoing business and its relationships with employees, customers, suppliers and contractors; and the acquired business or assets may have unknown liabilities which may be significant. In the event that the Company chooses to raise debt capital to finance any such acquisition, the Company’s leverage will be increased. If the Company chooses to use equity as consideration for such acquisition, existing shareholders may experience dilution. Alternatively, the Company may choose to finance any such acquisition with its existing resources. There can be no assurance that the Company would be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions.

 

NO DIVIDENDS

 

No dividends on the Common Shares have been paid by the Company to date and the Company may not declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any payments of dividends will be dependent upon the financial requirements of the Company to finance future growth, the financial condition of the Company and other factors which the Company’s Board of Directors may consider appropriate in the circumstances.

 

Page 74

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES

 

The Company conducts certain of its operations through foreign subsidiaries and some of its assets are held in such entities. Any limitation on the transfer of cash or other assets between the Company and such entities, or among such entities, could restrict the Company’s ability to fund its operations efficiently. Any such limitations, or the perception that such limitations may exist now or in the future, could have an adverse impact on the Company’s valuation and stock price.

 

ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND INTERNAL CONTROLS

 

The Company prepares its financial reports in accordance with IFRS applicable to publicly accountable enterprises. In preparing financial reports, management may need to rely upon assumptions, make estimates or use their best judgment in determining the financial condition of the Company. Significant accounting policies are described in more detail in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements. In order to have a reasonable level of assurance that financial transactions are properly authorized, assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use, and transactions are properly recorded and reported, the Company has implemented and continues to analyze its internal control systems for financial reporting. Although the Company believes its financial reporting and annual consolidated financial statements are prepared with reasonable safeguards to ensure reliability, the Company cannot provide absolute assurance.

 

ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITIES

 

Substantially all of the assets of the Company are located outside of Canada and certain of the Directors and officers of the Company are resident outside of Canada. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible to enforce judgments granted by a court in Canada against the assets of the Company or the Directors and officers of the Company residing outside of Canada.

 

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE

 

COMMON SHARES

 

The authorized share capital of the Company consists of an unlimited number of Common Shares without par value, of which 187,102,168 Common Shares were issued and outstanding as December 31, 2019, and 187,192,168 Common Shares are issued and outstanding as of March 23, 2020.

 

The holders of Common Shares will be entitled to receive notice of and to attend any meeting of the shareholders of Orla and will be entitled to one vote for each Common Share held (except at meetings at which only the holders of another class of shares are entitled to vote). The holders of Common Shares will be entitled to receive dividends, on a pro rata basis, if, as and when declared by the Board of Directors and, subject to the prior satisfaction of all preferential rights, to participate rateably in the net assets of Orla in the event of any dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of Orla, whether voluntary or involuntary, or other distribution of assets of Orla among shareholders for the purposes of winding up its affairs.

 

WARRANTS

 

None of the Company’s outstanding share purchase warrants are listed and posted for trading on the TSX and none of the Company’s outstanding share purchase warrants, except for the February 2021 Warrants, are governed by the terms of a warrant indenture.

 

Page 75

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The following table summarizes information about the number of warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and as of the date of this AIF:

 

Expiry date   Exercise
price
    December 31,
2019
    Date of this AIF  
February 15, 2021   $ 2.35       8,790,600       8,790,600  
July 8, 2021   $ 0.62       570,000       570,000  
June 12, 2022   $ 1.65       5,842,500       5,842,500  
November 7, 2022   $ 1.40       3,000,000       3,000,000  
December 18, 2026   $ 3.00       32,500,000       32,500,000  
Total number of warrants             50,703,100       50,703,100  
                         
Weighted average exercise price           $ 2.61     $ 2.61  

 

STOCK OPTIONS, RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS, DEFERRED SHARE UNITS AND BONUS SHARES

 

As at March 20, 2020:

 

· 9,827,336 Common Shares are issuable on exercise of outstanding stock options;

 

· 1,014,972 Common Shares are issuable upon vesting of outstanding Restricted Share Units (or cash may be payable in lieu thereof); and

 

· 508,780 Common Shares are issuable upon vesting of outstanding Deferred Share Units (or cash may be payable in lieu thereof).

 

In addition, the Company has granted an entitlement to its Chairman of the Board to receive a one-time award of 500,000 Common Shares (“Chairman Bonus Shares”) at a deemed price of $1.39 per Chairman Bonus Share in consideration for his acting as Chairman of the Board, which Chairman Bonus Shares have certain vesting restrictions. The Chairman Bonus Shares will only become issuable on the date that Mr. Jeannes ceases to act as a director of the Company following June 18, 2020, unless the Chairman Bonus Shares sooner vest upon a change of control of the Company as defined in the award agreement.

 

The Company has also granted an entitlement to its President and Chief Executive Officer to receive a one-time award of 1,000,000 Common Shares (“CEO Bonus Shares”), which CEO Bonus Shares have staged vesting restrictions based upon the Company’s achievement of certain 30-day volume weighted average trading price levels on the TSX, at which times a specified percentage of the CEO Bonus Shares will become issuable to Mr. Simpson, unless the CEO Bonus Shares sooner vest upon a change of control as defined in the award agreement. As of the date of this AIF, the vesting conditions for 250,0000 of these CEO Bonus Shares had been achieved; however, the Common Shares had not yet been issued.

 

DIVIDENDS

 

The Company has no present intention of paying dividends on its Common Shares, as it anticipates that all available funds will be invested to finance the growth of its business. The payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be reviewed periodically by the Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, conditions then existing including earnings, financial condition and capital requirements, restrictions in financing agreements, business opportunities and conditions and other factors. There are no restrictions that could prevent the Company from paying dividends. The Company has not paid any dividends on its Common Shares since its incorporation.

 

Page 76

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

MARKET FOR SECURITIES

 

The Common Shares are currently listed and posted for trading on the TSX under the symbol “OLA”. The following table sets forth information relating to the trading of the Common Shares on the TSX for the most recently completed financial year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Month   High
(C$)
    Low
($)
    Volume  
January 2019   $ 1.28     $ 0.94       1,032,688  
February 2019   $ 1.40     $ 1.10       2,942,904  
March 2019   $ 1.20     $ 1.00       1,725,766  
April 2019   $ 1.10     $ 0.85       2,613,332  
May 2019   $ 1.08     $ 0.96       1,326,871  
June 2019   $ 1.12     $ 0.96       1,461,761  
July 2019   $ 1.54     $ 1.10       10,442,066  
August 2019   $ 1.80     $ 1.45       6,244,258  
September 2019   $ 1.78     $ 1.49       3,665,894  
October 2019   $ 1.74     $ 1.42       3,126,895  
November 2019   $ 1.72     $ 1.45       2,133,402  
December 2019   $ 2.05     $ 1.60       14,818,571  

 

The price of the Common Shares as quoted by the TSX at the close on December 31, 2019 was C$2.00 and on March 20, 2020 was C$1.76.

 

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

 

NAME, OCCUPATION AND SECURITY HOLDING

 

The following table sets out the name, province or state, and country of residence of each current Director and executive officer of the Company, their respective positions held with the Company and their respective principal occupations during the preceding five years.

 

Name, Province and Country of
Residence, and Position
Director/Officer Since Principal Occupation for the Past Five Years

Jason D. Simpson 3

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

Ontario, Canada

November 2018 Director, President and Chief Executive of the Company since November 2018; Chief Operating Officer of Torex Gold Resources Inc. from January 2013 to November 2018.  

 

Page 77

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Name, Province and Country of
Residence, and Position
Director/Officer Since Principal Occupation for the Past Five Years

Charles A. Jeannes 1, 2, 4

 

Director
(Non-Executive Chair of the Board of Directors)

 

Nevada, USA

 

June 2017 Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors; Director of Tahoe Resources Inc. from January 2017 to February 2019; Director of Pan American Silver Corp. since February 2019 and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (formerly Silver Wheaton Corp.) since November 2016 (mining companies); former President and Chief Executive Officer of Goldcorp (mining company) from 2009 until April 2016, and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development from 2006 until 2008; serves as a University of Nevada, Reno (“UNR”) Foundation Trustee (a non-profit Board).

George Albino 1, 4

 

Director

 

Colorado, USA

 

June 2017 Corporate Director and Geologist; Chairman of the Board of Eldorado Gold Corporation (mining company) since December 2017 and director since October 2016; Managing Director and Mining Analyst at GMP Securities, L.P., Research Division from 2010 until 2016.

Tim Haldane 3

 

Director

 

Arizona, USA

 

June 2017 Mining professional with international project development experience; previously Senior Vice-President of Operations - USA and Latin America at Agnico Eagle (mining company) from 2014 until February 2017.

Richard Hall 2, 4

 

Director

 

Colorado, USA

 

June 2015 Corporate Director, Geologist and Mineral Industry Consultant; Director at IAMGold Corporation from March 2012 to present, Kaminak Gold Corporation from February 2013 to July 2016 and Klondex Mines Ltd. (Chairman) from September 2014 to July 2018 (all mining companies).

Jean Robitaille 2, 3

 

Director

 

Ontario, Canada

 

December 2016 Senior Vice-President, Business Strategy and Technical Services at Agnico Eagle (mining company) since 2014; 30 years at Agnico Eagle, including as Senior Vice-President, Technical Services and Project Development (2008 to 2013), Vice-President, Metallurgy and Marketing, General Manager, Metallurgy and Marketing and Mill Superintendent and Project Manager; prior to Agnico Eagle, Mr. Robitaille worked as a metallurgist with Teck Mining Group (mining company); director of Pershimco Resources Inc. (2011 to 2016).

David Stephens 1

 

Director

 

Alberta, Canada

 

March 2018 Partner, Agentis Capital Mining Partners (capital markets advisory) and consultant (mining and technology) from 2019-present; Vice President, Corporate Development and Marketing at Goldcorp (mining company) from 2017-2019; Vice President, Treasurer of Goldcorp (2016-2017); Director, Business Development of Goldcorp (2015-2016);  prior joining Goldcorp, he spent 10 years working in investment banking and equity research at various organizations including Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd. and Orion Securities.

 

Page 78

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Name, Province and Country of
Residence, and Position
Director/Officer Since Principal Occupation for the Past Five Years

Elizabeth McGregor 1, 4

 

Director

 

British Columbia, Canada

 

June 2019 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tahoe Resources Inc. (mining company) from August 9, 2016 until the acquisition by Pan American Silver Corp. on February 22, 2019; prior to her role as Chief Financial Officer, she served as Tahoe Resources Inc.’s VP Treasurer; Goldcorp (mining company) from 2007 to 2013, where she held various financial roles including Director of Project Finance and Cost Control; Administration Manager at the Peñasquito mine; and Director of Risk.  She has served as a director of Kinross Gold Corporation (mining company) since November 6, 2019.

Etienne Morin

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

British Columbia, Canada

 

April 2018 Chief Financial Officer of the Company since May 2018; Director, Investor Relations of Goldcorp (mining company) from June 2017 to May 2018; Director, Business Planning and Financial Evaluations of Goldcorp from March 2014 to September 2016; Director of Corporate Development of Goldcorp from January 2013 to April 2014 and from October 2016 to June 2017.

 

Notes:
(1) Member of the Audit Committee. Ms. McGregor is the Chairperson of the Audit Committee.
(2) Member of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Hall is the Chairman of the Compensation Committee.
(3) Member of the Environmental, Sustainability, Health & Safety Committee. Mr. Haldane is the Chairman of the Environmental, Sustainability, Health & Safety Committee.
(4) Member of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee. Mr. Albino is the Chairman of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee.

 

Each Director’s term of office expires at the next annual meeting of shareholders of the Company or when his/her successor is duly elected or appointed, unless his/her term ends earlier in accordance with the articles or by-laws of the Company, he/she resigns from office or he/she becomes disqualified to act as a Director of the Company.

 

As at March 20, 2020, and based on the disclosure available on the System for Electronic Disclosure by Insiders (“SEDI”), the Directors and executive officers of the Company, as a group, beneficially own, directly or indirectly, or exercise control or direction over 6,925,050 Common Shares, representing approximately 3.7% of the total number of Common Shares outstanding before giving effect to the exercise of stock options, Restricted Share Units, Deferred Share Units or warrants to purchase Common Shares held by such Directors and executive officers.

 

CEASE TRADE ORDERS, BANKRUPTCIES, PENALTIES OR SANCTIONS

 

To the knowledge of the Company and, except as set out below, none of the Directors or executive officers of the Company is, as at the date of this AIF, or was within ten years before the date of this AIF, a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of any company (including the Company), that: (a) was subject to a cease trade order or similar order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, which order was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days (an “Order”) that was issued while the director or executive officer was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer; or (b) was subject to an Order that was issued after the director or executive officer ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer.

 

Page 79

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

None of the Directors or executive officers of the Company or, to the Company’s knowledge, any shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company have been subject to: (a) any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or have entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority, or (a) any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

 

None of the Directors or executive officers of the Company, or, to the Company’s knowledge, any shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company: (a) is, as at the date of this AIF, or has been within ten years before the date of this AIF, a director or executive officer of any company (including the Company) that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or (b) has, within the ten years before the date of this AIF, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of the director, executive officer or shareholder.

 

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

 

To the best of the Company’s knowledge, and other than as disclosed in this AIF, there are no known existing or potential conflicts of interest between the Company and any of the Company’s Directors or officers. However, certain of the Directors and officers of the Company are directors, officers and/or shareholders of other private and publicly listed companies, including companies that engage in mineral exploration and development and therefore it is possible that a conflict may arise between their duties to the Company and their duties to such other companies. All such conflicts will be dealt with pursuant to the provisions of the applicable corporate legislation and the Company’s Code. In the event that such a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the Directors, a Director affected by the conflict must disclose the nature and extent of his interest and abstain from voting for or against matters concerning the matter in respect of which the conflict arises. Directors and executive officers are required to disclose any conflicts or potential conflicts to the Board of Directors as soon as they become aware of them. See the section of this AIF entitled “Risk Factors – Conflicts of Interest”.

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS

 

There are no material legal proceedings or regulatory actions involving Orla or its properties as at the date of this AIF, and Orla is not aware of any such proceedings or actions currently contemplated.

 

INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

 

Other than as disclosed in this AIF, no Director or executive officer of the Company, no person or company that beneficially owns, or controls or directs, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of any class or series of the Company’s outstanding voting securities and no associate or affiliate of any of such persons or companies has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction within the three most recently completed financial years or during the current financial year that has materially affected or is reasonably expected to materially affect the Company.

 

Page 80

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS

 

The transfer agent and registrar for the Common Shares is Computershare Investor Services Inc. at its principal offices in Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario.

 

The Warrant Agent for the February 2021 Warrants is Computershare Trust Company of Canada at its principal offices in Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario.

 

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

 

The only material contracts entered into by the Company within the financial period ended December 31, 2019 or since such time or before such time that are still in effect, other than those in the ordinary course of business, are as follows:

 

1, The Loan Agreement with respect to the Facility. See “General Development of the Business – Developments During 2019” for further details.

 

INTERESTS OF EXPERTS

 

QUALIFIED PERSONS UNDER NI 43-101

 

The following persons have been named as having prepared or certified a report, valuation, statement, or opinion described or included in a filing, or referred to in a filing, made under National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations during, or relating to, the Company’s financial year ended December 31, 2019:

 

Camino Rojo Report – Carl E. Defilippi, RM, SME of KCA, Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. of RGI, Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM of IMC and David Hawkins, C.P.G. of Barranca Group, LLC.

 

Cerro Quema Report – Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA.

 

None of the foregoing persons, or any director, officer, employee, or partner thereof, as applicable, received or has received a direct or indirect interest in the Company’s property or the property of any of the Company’s associates or affiliates. Each of the aforementioned persons are independent of the Company and held an interest in either less than 1% or none of the Company’s securities or the securities of any associate or affiliate of the Company at the time of preparation of the respective reports and after the preparation of such reports and estimates, and they did not receive any direct or indirect interest in any of the Company’s securities or the securities of any associate or affiliate of the Company in connection with the preparation of the Report. None of the aforementioned persons nor any director, officer, employee, or partner, as applicable, of the aforementioned companies or partnerships is currently expected to be elected, appointed, or employed as a Director, officer or employee of the Company or of any associate or affiliate of the Company.

 

All scientific and technical information in this AIF has been reviewed and approved by Hans Smit, P.Geo., who is a “Qualified Person” under NI 43-101. As of the date hereof, Hans Smit held 3,082,900 Common Shares, 100,000 warrants, 1,214,305 stock options, and 221,509 RSUs of the Company.

 

Page 81

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

AUDITORS

 

The Company’s independent auditors are Davidson and Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, who have issued an Independent Auditor’s Report in respect to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019. Davidson and Company LLP has advised the Company that they are independent with respect to the Company within the meaning of the Chartered Professional Accountants of British Columbia Code of Professional Conduct and the rules and standards of the PCAOB.

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION

 

The Audit Committee has the responsibility of, among other things: overseeing financial reporting, internal controls, the audit process and the establishment of “whistleblower” and related policies; recommending the appointment of the independent auditor and reviewing the annual audit plan and auditor compensation; pre-approving audit, audit related and tax services to be provided by the independent auditor; and reviewing and recommending approval to the Board of Directors of annual and quarterly financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis.

 

The Audit Committee’s charter sets out its responsibilities and duties, qualifications for membership, procedures and reporting to the Company’s Board of Directors. A copy of the charter is attached hereto as Schedule “A” to this AIF.

 

COMPOSITION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

The Audit Committee is comprised of four Directors. The following table sets out the name of each current Audit Committee member and whether they are “independent” and “financially literate”. To be considered independent, a member of the Audit Committee must not have any direct or indirect material relationship with the Company. A material relationship is a relationship which could, in the view of the Board, reasonably interfere with the exercise of a member’s independent judgement. To be considered financially literate, a member of the Audit Committee must have the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected by the Company’s financial statements.

 

Name of Member Independent Financially Literate
Elizabeth McGregor Yes Yes
George Albino Yes Yes
Charles A. Jeannes Yes Yes
David Stephens Yes Yes

  

RELEVANT EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE

 

The education and experience of each Audit Committee member that is relevant to the performance of his or her responsibilities as an Audit Committee member and, in particular, any education or experience that would provide the member with: an understanding of the accounting principles used by Orla to prepare its financial statements; the ability to assess the general application of such accounting principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and provisions; experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by Orla’s financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities; and an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting, is set out below.

 

Page 82

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

ELIZABETH MCGREGOR

 

Ms. McGregor served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tahoe Resources Inc. from August 2016 until the acquisition by Pan American Silver Corp. in February 2019. Ms. McGregor is a Canadian Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CA) and, prior to her role as Chief Financial Officer, served as Tahoe Resources Inc.’s VP Treasurer. She directed financial planning, corporate liquidity, financial reporting and risk management. Prior to joining Tahoe Resources Inc., she worked at Goldcorp from 2007 to 2013 where she held various financial roles including Director of Project Finance and Cost Control; Administration Manager at the Peñasquito mine; and Director of Risk. Ms. McGregor has also served as a director of Kinross Gold Corporation since November 6, 2019. Ms. McGregor began her career at KPMG as Audit Manager. She holds a B.A. (Hons) from Queen’s University in Kingston.

 

DAVID STEPHENS

 

Mr. Stephens is a Partner at Agentis Capital Mining Partners which provides capital markets advisory services and is a consultant in the mining and technology industries through his private consulting company. He was the Vice President, Corporate Development and Marketing at Goldcorp until its acquisition by Newmont on April 18, 2019, having previously served as Vice President and Treasurer. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Mr. Stephens spent ten years working in investment banking and equity research at various organizations including Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd. and Orion Securities. Mr. Stephens holds a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Harvard University.

 

GEORGE ALBINO

 

Dr. Albino, Ph.D. is a geologist and was a Managing Director and Mining Analyst at GMP Securities, L.P., Research Division from 2010 until 2016. Prior to this, he was an Analyst at Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd., Research Division from June 2002 until 2010, focusing on North American precious metal producers and exploration companies as well as base metal, uranium, and diamond companies. Dr. Albino has over 35 years of experience in mining and finance, having been a geologist for 18 years and as a highly-ranked sell side analyst covering mining (principally gold) stocks for 19 years. Before joining the financial services side of the business, he worked for 18 years in the mining industry, academia and government as an Exploration and Research Geologist exploring for precious metals, base metals, and diamonds. He is also currently Chairman of the Board of Eldorado Gold Corporation. Dr. Albino has a Ph.D. from the University of Western Ontario, an M.S. from the Colorado State University and a B.A.Sc. from Queen’s University.

 

CHARLES JEANNES

 

Mr. Jeannes served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Goldcorp from 2009 until April 2016, and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development from 2006 until 2008. From 1999 until the acquisition of Glamis Gold Ltd. (“Glamis”) by Goldcorp, he was Executive Vice President, Administration, General Counsel and Secretary of Glamis. Prior to joining Glamis, Mr. Jeannes worked for Placer Dome Inc., most recently as Vice President of Placer Dome North America. He is also currently a Director of Pan American Silver Corp. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (formerly Silver Wheaton Corp.) and serves as a UNR Foundation Trustee (a non-profit Board). He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from UNR and graduated from the University of Arizona School of Law with honours in 1983. He practiced law from 1983 until 1994 and has broad experience in capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, public and private financing, and international operations.

 

Page 83

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT

 

Since the commencement of Orla’s most recently completed financial year, there has not been a recommendation of the Audit Committee to nominate or compensate an external auditor which was not adopted by the Board of Directors.

 

RELIANCE ON CERTAIN EXEMPTIONS

 

At no time since the commencement of the Company’s most recently completed financial year has the Company relied on the exemption in Section 2.4, Section 3.2, Section 3.4, Section 3.5 or Section 3.8 of NI 52-110 or an exemption from NI 52-110, in whole or in part, granted under Part 8 of NI 52-110.

 

PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

 

The Audit Committee has established policies and procedures that are intended to control the services provided by the Company’s auditors and to monitor their continuing independence. Under these policies, no services may be undertaken by the Company’s auditors, unless the engagement is specifically approved by the Audit Committee or the services are included within a category that has been pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The maximum charge for services is established by the Audit Committee when the specific engagement is approved or the category of services pre-approved. Management is required to notify the Audit Committee of the nature and value of pre-approved services undertaken.

 

The Audit Committee will not approve engagements relating to, or pre-approve categories of, non-audit services to be provided by Orla’s auditors (i) if such services are of a type whereby the performance of which would cause the auditors to cease to be independent within the meaning of applicable rules, and (ii) without consideration, among other things, of whether the auditors are best situated to provide the required services and whether the required services are consistent with their role as auditor.

 

EXTERNAL AUDITOR SERVICE FEES

 

The aggregate fees billed by the Company’s external auditors in each of the last two financial years are as follows:

 

Financial Year Ended   Audit Fees 1     Audit-Related
Fees 2
    Tax Fees 3     All Other
Fees 4
 
December 31, 2019   $ 90,000     $ 20,500     $ 22,350     $ NIL  
December 31, 2018   $ 92,500     $ 31,000     $ 12,500     $ NIL  

 

Notes:
(1) Fees billed by the Company’s auditor for audit services.
(2) Fees billed by the Company's external auditor for assurance-related services that are not included in “audit fees”. Such fees consist primarily of quarterly reviews and work related to providing consents pursuant to financings.
(3) Fees for professional services rendered by the Company’s external auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
(4) Fees for products and services provided by the Company’s external auditor, other than services reported under the table headings “Audit Fees”, “Audit-Related Fees” or “Tax Fees”.

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

Additional information relating to the Company may be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the Company’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Additional information, including Directors’ and officers’ remuneration and indebtedness, principal holders of the Company’s securities and securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, is contained in the Management Information Circular of the Company dated May 9, 2019 prepared for its most recent annual meeting of shareholders held on June 12, 2019 and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This information will also be contained in the Management Information Circular of the Company to be prepared in connection with the Company’s 2020 annual meeting of shareholders currently scheduled to be held in May 2020 which will be available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Additional financial information is provided in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and management discussion and analysis for the financial year ended December 31, 2019, which are filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

Page 84

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

SCHEDULE “A”

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The primary responsibility of the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) is to oversee Orla Mining Ltd.’s (the, “Company” or “Orla”) financial reporting process on behalf of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) in order to assist the directors of the Company in meeting their responsibilities with respect to financial reporting by the Company.

 

Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation, and integrity of the Company's financial statements and for the appropriateness of the accounting principles and reporting policies that are used by the Company. The independent auditors are responsible for auditing the Company's annual financial statements.

 

1. RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITY

 

The role, responsibility, authority, and power of the Committee includes, but is not be limited to the following:

 

(a) the Committee shall be directly responsible for the appointment and termination (subject to Board and shareholder ratification), compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditors, including resolution of disagreements between management and the independent auditors regarding financial reporting;

 

(b) the Committee shall ensure that at all times there are direct communication channels between the Committee and the internal auditors, if applicable, and the external auditors of the Company to discuss and review specific issues, as appropriate;

 

(c) the Committee shall discuss with the independent auditors (and internal auditors, if applicable) the overall scope and plans for their audits, including the adequacy of staff. The Committee shall discuss with management and the independent auditors the adequacy and effectiveness of the accounting and financial controls, including the Company's policies and procedures to assess, monitor, and manage business risk and legal risk;

 

(d) the Committee shall, at least annually, obtain and review a report by the independent auditors:

 

(i) describing their internal quality control procedures;

 

(ii) reviewing any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control review, or peer review, or any inquiry or investigation by a government or professional institute or society, within the preceding five years, respecting any independent audit carried out by the independent auditors, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues; and

 

(iii) outlining all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company in order to assess the auditor's independence;

 

(e) the Committee shall meet separately, on a regular basis, with management and the independent auditors to discuss any issues or concerns warranting Committee attention. As part of this process, the Committee shall provide sufficient opportunity for the independent auditors to meet privately with the Committee;

 

(f) the Committee shall receive regular reports from the independent auditors on critical policies and practices of the Company, including all alternative treatment of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles which have been discussed with management. Where alternative treatment exists, the independent auditors shall be invited to express their opinion as to whether the Company is using best practices;

 

Page 85

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

(g) the Committee shall review management's assertion on its assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls as of the end of the most recent fiscal year and the independent auditors' report on management's assertion;

 

(h) the Committee shall review and discuss earnings press releases, as well as information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies;

 

(i) the Committee shall review the interim and annual financial statements and disclosures under management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations with management and the annual audited statements with the independent auditors, prior to recommending them to the Board for approval, release, or inclusion in any reports to shareholders and/or securities commissions;

 

(j) the Committee shall receive reports, if any, from corporate legal representatives of evidence of material violation of securities laws or breaches of fiduciary duty;

 

(k) the Committee shall review and ensure that procedures are in place for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting and auditing matters, as well as the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;

 

(l) the Committee shall meet as often as it deems appropriate to discharge its responsibilities and, in any event, at least four times per year. Additional meetings may be held as deemed necessary by the Chair of the Audit Committee (the “Chair”) or as requested by any Committee member or the external auditors or management;

 

(m) the Committee shall review all issues related to a change of auditor, including the information to be included in the notice of change of auditor and the planned steps for an orderly transition;

 

(n) the Committee shall pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided to the Company by the external auditors;

 

(o) the Committee shall review and approve the Company's policy with regard to the hiring of current and former partners or employees of the present and former external auditors;

 

(p) the Committee shall report on all the foregoing matters to the directors of the Company at the next Board meeting following;

 

(q) at all times, the membership of the Committee shall be such that:

 

(i) it shall be comprised of no fewer than three members;

 

(ii) the majority of the members thereof shall be “unrelated directors” or “independent” directors of the Company, as may be defined by the TSX Venture Exchange, the Ontario Securities Commission, or any other regulator to which the Company reports or may report in the future;

 

(iii) the majority of the members of the Committee shall be financially literate in terms of the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements;

 

(iv) no independent member of the Committee shall have a material business relationship with the Company;

 

(r) no business shall be transacted by the Committee except at a meeting of the members thereof at which;

 

(i) a majority of the members thereof are present;

 

(ii) a majority of the members thereof present are ''unrelated or independent directors” of the Company; or

 

(iii) by a resolution in writing signed by all of the members of the Committee;

 

(s) the minutes of all meetings of the Audit Committee shall be provided to the Board.

 

Page 86

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Annual Information Form
Year ended December 31, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

2. CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

 

With regard to the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) and its Whistleblower Policy (the “Policy”) the Committee shall:

 

(a) review periodically and recommend to the Board any amendments to the Code and/or Policy and monitor the policies and procedures established by management to ensure compliance with the Code;

 

(b) review actions taken by management to ensure compliance with the Code and their response to any violations of the Code; and

 

(c) monitor the adequacy of the Code, any proposed amendments to the Code and any waivers of the Code granted by the Board.

 

3. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR

 

The fundamental responsibility of the Chair is to be responsible for the management and effective performance of the Committee and to provide leadership to the Committee in fulfilling its Charter and any other matters delegated to it by the Board. To that end, the Chair’s responsibilities shall include:

 

(a) working with the Chairman of the Board to establish the frequency of Committee meetings and the agendas for such meetings;

 

(b) providing leadership to the Committee and presiding over Committee meetings;

 

(c) facilitating the flow of information to and from the Committee and fostering and environment in which Committee members may ask questions and express their viewpoints;

 

(d) reporting to the Board with respect to significant activities of the Committee and any recommendations of the Committee;

 

(e) addressing, or causing to be addressed, all concerns communicated to the Chair under the Code and Policy;

 

(f) leading the Committee in annually reviewing and assessing the adequacy of its mandate and evaluating its effectiveness in fulfilling its mandate; and

 

(g) taking such other steps as are reasonably required to ensure that the Committee carries out its mandate.

 

4. ADOPTION

 

The Charter was adopted by the Board on December 6, 2016.

 

Page 87

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.37

 

Form 52-109F1

Certification of Annual Filings
Full Certificate

 

I, Jason Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of Orla Mining Ltd., certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended December 31, 2019.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

 

1

 

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: N/A

 

6. Evaluation: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have

 

(a) evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

 

(b) evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A

 

(i) our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

 

(ii) N/A

 

7. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on October 1, 2019 and ended on December 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

8. Reporting to the issuer’s auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer’s auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date: March 23, 2020.  
   
“Jason Simpson”  
Jason Simpson  
Chief Executive Officer  

 

2

 

 

Exhibit 99.38

 

FORM 13-501F1

CLASS 1 REPORTING ISSUERS AND CLASS 3B REPORTING ISSUERS PARTICIPATION FEE

 

MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

 

I, Etienne Morin, an officer of the reporting issuer noted below have examined this Form 13-501F1 (the Form) being submitted hereunder to the Alberta Securities Commission and certify that to my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the information provided in the Form is complete and accurate.

 

   “Etienne Morin”   March 23, 2020

 

Name: Etienne Morin

Title:   Chief Financial Officer

  Date

 

Reporting Issuer Name: ORLA MINING LTD.
 
End date of previous financial year: December 31, 2019
 
Type of Reporting Issuer: Class 1 reporting issuer
 
Highest Trading Marketplace: TSX

 

Market value of listed or quoted equity securities:

 

Equity Symbol       OLA  
           
1st Specified Trading Period (dd/mm/yy)       01/01/2019 to 31/03/2019  
           
Closing price of the security in the class or series on the last trading day of the specified trading period in which such security was listed or quoted on the highest trading marketplace       $1.06 (i)
           
Number of securities in the class or series of such security outstanding at the end of the last trading day of the specified trading period       179,493,510 (ii)
           
Market value of class or series   (i) x (ii)   $190,263,120.60 (A)
           
2nd Specified Trading Period (dd/mm/yy)       01/04/2019 to 30/06/2019  
           
Closing price of the security in the class or series on the last trading day of the specified trading period in which such security was listed or quoted on the highest trading marketplace       $1.10 (iii)
           
Number of securities in the class or series of such security outstanding at the end of the last trading day of the specified trading period       179,782,010 (iv)
           
Market value of class or series   (iii) x (iv)   $197,760,211.00 (B)

 

 

 

 

3rd Specified Trading Period (dd/mm/yy)       01/07/2019 to 30/09/2019  
           
Closing price of the security in the class or series on the last trading day of the specified trading period in which such security was listed or quoted on the highest trading marketplace       $1.58 (v)
           
Number of securities in the class or series of such security outstanding at the end of the last trading day of the specified trading period       186,081,177 (vi)
           
Market value of class or series   (v) x (vi)   $294,008,259.66 (C)
           
4th Specified Trading Period (dd/mm/yy)       01/10/2019 to 31/12/2019  
           
Closing price of the security in the class or series on the last trading day of the specified trading period in which such security was listed or quoted on the highest trading marketplace       $2.00 (vii)
           
Number of securities in the class or series of such security outstanding at the end of the last trading day of the specified trading period       187,102,168 (viii)
           
Market value of class or series   (vii) x (viii)   $374,204,336.00 (D)
           
5th Specified Trading Period (dd/mm/yy)       to  
           
Closing price of the security in the class or series on the last trading day of the specified trading period in which such security was listed or quoted on the highest trading marketplace       $ (ix)
           
Number of securities in the class or series of such security outstanding at the end of the last trading day of the specified trading period         (x)
           
Market value of class or series   (ix) x (x)   $ (E)
           
           
Average Market Value of Class or Series
(Calculate the simple average of the market value of the class or series of security for each applicable specified trading period (i.e. A through E above))
      $264,058,981.82 (1)
           
(Repeat the above calculation for each other class or series of equity securities of the reporting issuer (and a subsidiary, if applicable) that was listed or quoted on a marketplace at the end of the previous financial year)  
           
Fair value of outstanding debt securities:       $- (2)

 

(Provide details of how value was determined)

 

 

 

 

Capitalization for the previous financial year   (1) + (2)   $264,058,981.82  
           
Participation Fee       $14,000.00  
           
Late Fee, if applicable       $-  
           
Total Fee Payable
(Participation Fee plus Late Fee)
      $14,000.00  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.39

 

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

 

Presented in Canadian dollars

 

     

 

 

  

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

 

To the Shareholders of

Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Opinion

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, cash flows and changes in equity for the years then ended, and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies.

 

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).

 

Basis for Opinion

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial statements in Canada, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

 

Other Information

 

Management is responsible for the other information. The other information obtained at the date of this auditor's report includes Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

 

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

 

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

 

We obtained Management’s Discussion and Analysis prior to the date of this auditor’s report. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

 

Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

 

 

  

     

 

 

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

 

Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Company's financial reporting process.

 

Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.

 

As part of an audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

 

Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control.

Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.

Conclude on the appropriateness of management's use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor's report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor's report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.

Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Company to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.

 

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

 

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

 

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Erez Bahar.

 

“DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP”

 

Vancouver, Canada Chartered Professional Accountants

 

March 20, 2020

 

     

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

 

    December 31     December 31  
As at   2019     2018  
ASSETS                
Current assets                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 30,009     $ 16,686  
Accounts receivable     122       385  
Prepaid expenses     64       206  
      30,195       17,277  
Restricted funds     662       205  
Value added taxes recoverable (note 7)     1,747       849  
Equipment (note 5)     370       344  
Exploration and evaluation assets (note 6(d))     163,383       169,282  
TOTAL ASSETS   $ 196,357     $ 187,957  
                 
LIABILITIES                
Current liabilities                
Trade and other payables (note 8)   $ 1,042     $ 1,743  
Accrued liabilities     2,049       1,916  
      3,091       3,659  
Lease obligations     57        
Camino Rojo project loan (note 9)     16,833        
Newmont loan (note 10)     12,573       6,103  
Accrued liabilities – long term     338        
Site closure provisions (note 11)     748       745  
TOTAL LIABILITIES     33,640       10,507  
                 
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                
Share capital (note 12)     208,186       201,077  
Reserves     39,348       25,960  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     (1,036 )     4,797  
Accumulated deficit     (83,781 )     (54,384 )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY     162,717       177,450  
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 196,357     $ 187,957  

 

Nature of operations (note 1)

Events after the reporting period (notes 13(a) and 20(a))

 

Authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors on March 20, 2020.

 

/s/ Elizabeth McGregor   /s/ Jason Simpson
Elizabeth McGregor, Director   Jason Simpson, Director

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss

(Thousands of Canadian dollars, except per-share amounts)

 

 

    Year ended December 31  
    2019     2018  
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENSES (note 6)                
Assays and analysis   $ 253     $ 1,485  
Drilling     1,564       3,007  
Geological     1,858       3,775  
Engineering     2,471       508  
Environmental     754       287  
Community and government     1,134       902  
Land and water use, claims and concessions     6,000       4,979  
Project management     917       351  
Project review     153       141  
Site activities     2,297       3,478  
Site administration     2,438       3,175  
Recognition of site closure provisions           745  
      19,839       22,833  
                 
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES                
Office and administrative     700       561  
Professional fees     711       593  
Regulatory and transfer agent     272       278  
Salaries and benefits     2,621       1,722  
      4,304       3,154  
                 
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)                
Depreciation (note 5)     103       153  
Share based payments (note 13)     3,391       3,985  
Interest income     (142 )     (442 )
Interest expense     107        
Amortization of project loan transaction costs (note 9)     112        
Accretion – Newmont loan (note 10)     1,473       505  
Foreign exchange loss (gain)     210       (275 )
      5,254       3,926  
                 
LOSS FOR THE YEAR   $ 29,397     $ 29,913  
                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME)                
Items that may in future periods be reclassified to profit or loss:                
Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations     5,833       (13,454 )
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS   $ 35,230     $ 16,459  
                 
                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions)     182.6       176.7  
                 
Loss per share - basic and diluted   $ 0.16     $ 0.17  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

 

    Year ended December 31  
Cash flows provided by (used in):   2019     2018  
OPERATING ACTIVITIES                
Loss for the year   $ (29,397 )   $ (29,913 )
Adjustments for items not affecting cash:                
Depreciation     103       153  
Share based compensation     3,391       3,985  
Exploration expense paid via common shares     65        
Newmont loan proceeds received in excess of fair value, credited to exploration expense (note 10)     (1,707 )     (2,790 )
Accretion of the Newmont loan (note 10)     1,473       505  
Amortization of project loan transaction costs (note 9)     112        
Changes in site closure provisions charged to exploration expense           745  
Interest expense on lease     6        
Lease payments     (34 )      
Changes in non-cash working capital:                
Accounts receivable     253       100  
Prepaid expenses     139       251  
Trade and other payables     (733 )     402  
Accrued liabilities     499       1,118  
Cash used in operating activities     (25,830 )     (25,444 )
                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES                
Proceeds – private placement           30,767  
Proceeds – warrants exercised     3,823       107  
Proceeds – stock options exercised     1,581       136  
Share issuance costs     (128 )     (1,777 )
Advances received on the Camino Rojo project loan (note 9)     32,470        
Cash transaction costs of the Camino Rojo project loan     (4,147 )      
Advances received on the Newmont loan (note 10)     6,742       8,204  
Cash provided by financing activities     40,341       37,437  
                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES                
Purchase of equipment     (20 )     (234 )
Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets           (407 )
Restricted cash funded     (475 )      
Value added taxes paid     (907 )     (807 )
Cash used in investing activities     (1,402 )     (1,448 )
                 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash     214       (1 )
                 
Net increase in cash     13,323       10,544  
Cash, beginning of year     16,686       6,142  
CASH, END OF YEAR   $ 30,009     $ 16,686  
                 
Cash consist of:                
Bank current accounts and cash on hand   $ 30,009     $ 16,617  
Short term highly liquid investments           69  
Cash   $ 30,009     $ 16,686  

 

Supplemental cash flow information (note 15)

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

 

    Common shares     Reserves                    
    Number of
shares
(thousands)
    Amount     Share based
payments
reserve
    Warrants
reserve
    Total     Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income
    Retained
earnings
(deficit)
    Total  
Balance at January 1, 2018     160,441     $ 174,436     $ 5,062     $ 14,114     $ 19,176     $ (8,657 )   $ (24,471 )   $ 160,484  
Private placement     17,581       27,803             2,964       2,964                   30,767  
Share issue costs           (1,777 )                                   (1,777 )
Shares issued for debt settlement     148       207                                     207  
Exercise of stock options     657       249       (113 )           (113 )                 136  
Exercise of warrants     488       159             (52 )     (52 )                 107  
Share based payments                 3,985             3,985                   3,985  
Loss for the year                                         (29,913 )     (29,913 )
Other comprehensive income                                   13,454             13,454  
Balance at December 31, 2018     179,315     $ 201,077     $ 8,934     $ 17,026     $ 25,960     $ 4,797     $ (54,384 )   $ 177,450  
                                                                 
Balance at January 1, 2019     179,315     $ 201,077     $ 8,934     $ 17,026     $ 25,960     $ 4,797     $ (54,384 )   $ 177,450  
Shares issued for property payments     59       65                                     65  
Warrants exercised     6,167       5,865             (2,042 )     (2,042 )                 3,823  
Warrants issued July 2019 (note 12(c))           (1,940 )           1,940       1,940                    
Warrants issued December 2019 (note 9)                       11,765       11,765                   11,765  
Options exercised     1,359       2,994       (1,413 )           (1,413 )                 1,581  
Share issue costs           (128 )                                   (128 )
RSUs redeemed     202       253       (253 )           (253 )                  
Share based payments                 3,391             3,391                   3,391  
Loss for the year                                         (29,397 )     (29,397 )
Other comprehensive loss                                   (5,833 )           (5,833 )
Balance at December 31, 2019     187,102     $ 208,186     $ 10,659     $ 28,689     $ 39,348     $ (1,036 )   $ (83,781 )   $ 162,717  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 7

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

 

Orla Mining 5Ltd. was incorporated in Alberta in 2007 and was continued into British Columbia in 2010 and subsequently into Ontario under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) in 2014. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. The registered office of the Company is located at Suite 202, 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada.

 

The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties, and holds two gold projects – the Camino Rojo gold and silver project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama.

 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. Different bases of measurement may be appropriate if the Company is not expected to continue operations for the foreseeable future. As at December 31, 2019, the Company had not advanced any of its properties to commercial production and was not able to fund day-to-day activities through operating activities. The Company has received US$25 million of a US$125 million project loan facility in respect of the Camino Rojo project.

 

The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon successful results from our mineral exploration and development activities and our ability to attain profitable operations and generate cash or raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations. We expect to fund operating costs of the Company over the next twelve months with cash on hand and with further loan advances and equity financings.

 

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION

 

(a) Statement of compliance and basis of presentation

 

We have prepared these consolidated financial statements of the Company in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”). These consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars. Currency figures in tables are presented in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per-share amounts.

 

On March 20, 2020, the Board of Directors approved these consolidated financial statements for issuance.

 

(b) Basis of consolidation

 

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. Where necessary, we have made adjustments to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring their accounting policies in line with the accounting policies of the consolidated group. All intercompany transactions, balances, revenues, and expenses have been eliminated upon consolidation.

 

Subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial results of the Company from the effective date of acquisition or control and up to the effective date of disposition or loss of control. Control is achieved when the Company has power over the investee, is exposed to or has rights to variable returns from its involvement with an investee, and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee.

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Orla Mining Ltd. is the ultimate parent entity of the group. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the principal subsidiaries of the Company, their geographic locations, and the ownership interests held by the Company, were as follows:

 

        Ownership      
Name   Principal activity   Dec 31, 2019     Dec 31, 2018     Location
CR Acquisitions Ltd.   Holding company     100 %     100 %   Canada
Minerometalúrgica San Miguel S de RL de CV   Exploration     100 %     100 %   Mexico
Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV   Exploration     100 %     100 %   Mexico
Servicios Administrativos Camino Rojo SA de CV   Services provider     100 %     100 %   Mexico
Contrataciones Camino Rojo SA de CV   Services provider     100 %     100 %   Mexico
Minera Cerro Quema SA   Exploration     100 %     100 %   Panama
Aurum Exploration Inc.   Exploration     100 %     100 %   Panama
Monitor Gold Corporation   Exploration     100 %     100 %   USA

 

Subsequent to the reporting date, Servicios Administrativos Camino Rojo SA de CV and Contrataciones Camino Rojo SA de CV were dissolved, and their net assets were transferred to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV.

 

(c) Foreign currencies

 

(i) Functional currency

 

The functional currencies of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned, are as follows:

 

Orla Mining Ltd. Canadian dollars
CR Acquisitions Ltd. Canadian dollars
Minerometalúrgica San Miguel S de RL de CV Mexican pesos
Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV Mexican pesos
Contrataciones Camino Rojo SA de CV Mexican pesos
Servicios Administrativos Camino Rojo SA de CV Mexican pesos
Minera Cerro Quema SA United States dollars
Aurum Exploration Inc. United States dollars
Monitor Gold Corporation United States dollars

 

(ii) Foreign currency transactions

 

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into the respective functional currencies of each company at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the transactions.

 

Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate at the reporting date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate when the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items that are measured at historical cost in a foreign currency are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency differences are generally recognized in profit or loss.

 

(iii) Translation of foreign operations

 

The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into Canadian dollars at the official Bank of Canada exchange rates in effect on the reporting date. The results of operations of foreign operations are translated into Canadian dollars at the average exchange rates in effect during the reporting period. We recognize the foreign currency differences arising from translation in other comprehensive income within the translation reserve.

 

When we dispose of a foreign operation in its entirety, or partially such that we have lost control, we reclassify the cumulative amount in the translation reserve related to that foreign operation to profit or loss as part of the gain or loss on disposal.

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

We have applied the accounting policies set out below consistently to all periods presented in these financial statements.

 

The significant judgements we made in applying the Company’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty arising in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are discussed in note 4.

 

(a) Financial instruments

 

(i) Financial assets

 

We initially recognize financial assets when the Company becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Subsequent to initial recognition, we classify financial assets as measured at amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVOCI”) or fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”) after considering both our business model for managing the financial asset and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset.

 

A financial asset is measured at amortized cost if both of the following conditions are met:

 

a. the asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets in order to collect contractual cash flows, and
b. the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.

 

A financial asset is measured at FVOCI if both of the following conditions are met:

 

a. the financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets, and
b. the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.

 

We may make an irrevocable election at initial recognition to carry at FVOCI particular investments in equity instruments that would otherwise be measured at FVTPL.

 

A financial asset is required to be measured at FVTPL unless it is measured at amortized cost or at FVOCI.

 

As an exception to the rules above, we may, at initial recognition, irrevocably designate a financial asset as measured at FVTPL if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency (“accounting mismatch”) that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognizing the gains and losses on them on different bases.

 

If we change our business model for managing financial assets, we reclassify all affected financial assets on a prospective basis, without restating any previously recognized gains, losses or interest.

 

If the asset is reclassified to fair value, we determine the fair value at the reclassification date, and recognize in profit or loss any gain or loss arising from a difference between the previous carrying amount and fair value.

 

An embedded derivative is a component of a hybrid contract that also includes a non-derivative host, with the effect that some of the cash flows of the combined instrument vary in a way similar to a stand-alone derivative. A derivative that is attached to a financial instrument but is contractually transferable independently of that instrument, or has a different counterparty, is not an embedded derivative, and is treated as a separate financial instrument.

 

Upon initial recognition, we measure a financial asset at its fair value. However, we measure trade receivables that do not have a significant financing component at their transaction price. After initial recognition, we measure financial assets at amortized cost, FVOCI, or FVTPL.

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

Changes in fair value of a financial asset that is carried at FVTPL are recognized in profit or loss, and changes in fair value of a financial asset that is carried at FVOCI are recognized in other comprehensive income, unless it is part of a hedging relationship.

 

Gains or losses on a financial asset that is carried at FVTPL are recognized in profit or loss, and gains or losses on a financial asset that is carried at FVOCI are recognized in other comprehensive income, unless it is part of a hedging relationship. A gain or loss on a financial asset that is measured at amortized cost and is not part of a hedging relationship is recognized in profit or loss when the asset is derecognized, impaired, amortized, or reclassified.

 

(ii) Financial liabilities

 

We initially recognize financial liabilities when the Company becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. At initial recognition, we measure each financial liability at its fair value. In the case of a financial liability not at FVTPL, we deduct transaction costs that are directly attributable to the issuance of the financial liability.

 

Subsequent to initial recognition, we classify and measure all financial liabilities at amortized cost using the effective interest method, except for financial liabilities at FVTPL.

 

We may, at initial recognition, irrevocably designate a financial liability as measured at FVTPL.

 

(iii) Impairment

 

We recognize a loss allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets, based on expected credit losses.

 

(b) Cash and cash equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits, and money market instruments, with maturities from the date of acquisition of 100 days or less, which are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and are subject to insignificant changes in value.

 

(c) Restricted funds

 

Restricted funds consist of amounts lodged with government bodies or their designated banking institutions in support of mandated environmental, permitting, or employee retirement obligations.

 

(d) Exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) expenditures

 

Exploration and evaluation expenditures include the search for mineral resources, the determination of technical feasibility, and assessment of the commercial viability of an identified mineral resource. Activities include acquisition of rights to explore; topographical, geological, geochemical and geophysical studies; exploratory drilling; trenching; sampling; and evaluation of the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource.

 

We capitalize E&E assets acquired in a business combination, and also the initial acquisition costs of an E&E asset which does not represent a business. We expense all other E&E expenditures, including non-refundable advance royalty payments.

 

Capitalized E&E assets are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated impairment.

 

At the end of the reporting period when the technical feasibility and economic viability of a project are demonstrable, funding is in place, and a positive development decision is made, we test E&E assets for impairment and transfer them to “Projects under development and construction”. We capitalize subsequent expenditures on the project.

 

We assess E&E assets for impairment when indicators and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may exceed its recoverable amount. Typical indicators of impairment include:

 

· Substantive expenditure or further exploration and evaluation activities is neither budgeted nor planned;

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

· Title to the asset is compromised, has expired or is expected to expire;
· Adverse changes in the taxation, regulatory or political environment;
· Adverse changes in variables in commodity prices and markets making the project not viable; and
· Adverse changes in the exchange rate for the currency of operation, making the project not viable.

 

If any such indication exists, we estimate the recoverable amount of the asset to determine the extent of the impairment. Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, we estimate the recoverable amount of the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, we discount the estimated future cash flows to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the E&E asset. If we estimate the recoverable amount of an asset to be less than its carrying amount, we recognize an impairment loss in profit or loss for the period.

 

Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but to an amount that does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset (or cash generating unit) in prior years. We recognize reversals of impairment immediately in profit or loss.

 

(e) Projects under development and construction

 

We capitalize costs directly related to development or construction projects to “Projects under development and construction” until the asset is available for use in the manner intended by us. These capitalized amounts are reduced by the proceeds from the sale of metals extracted prior to commercial production. Any costs incurred in testing the assets to determine if they are functioning as intended are also capitalized.

 

When assets are available for us in the manner intended by us, we transfer these assets included in “Projects under development and construction” to “Mineral properties” and “Plant and equipment” as appropriate.

 

Projects under development and construction are not depreciated.

 

(f) Equipment

 

Equipment is initially recognized at cost. Cost includes purchase price, directly attributable costs, and the estimated present value of any future costs of decommissioning and removal. Equipment is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairments. We depreciate equipment to their residual values on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, typically as follows:

 

Equipment and office equipment 5 years  
Vehicles 4 years  
Computer hardware and software 3 years  

 

(g) Borrowing costs

 

Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use (a “qualifying asset”) are capitalized as part of the cost of that asset. Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that we incur in connection with the borrowing of funds.

 

Where funds are borrowed specifically to finance a project, the amount capitalized represents the actual borrowing costs incurred, net of income generated from the temporary investment of such amounts. Where the funds used to finance a project form part of general borrowings, the amount capitalized is calculated using a weighted average of rates applicable to relevant general borrowings during the reporting period.

 

All other borrowing costs are recognized in profit or loss when incurred. Borrowing costs related to exploration and evaluation are expensed as incurred.

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

No borrowing costs were capitalized during any of the periods presented.

 

(h) Leases

 

At the inception of a contract, we assess whether a contract is, or contains, a lease based on whether the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset, we consider whether:

 

· the contract involves the use of an identified asset, either explicitly or implicitly, including consideration of supplier substitution rights;

 

· we have the right to obtain substantially all the economic benefits from the use of the asset throughout the period of use; and

 

· we have the right to direct the use of the asset.

 

We recognize a right-of-use ("ROU") asset which is initially measured based on the initial amount of the lease liability plus any initial direct costs incurred less any lease incentives received. We depreciate the ROU asset to the earlier of the end of the useful life or the lease term using either the straight-line or units-of-production method, depending on which method more accurately reflects the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits. The lease term includes periods covered by an option to extend if we determine the Company is reasonably likely to exercise the option.

 

We initially measure the lease liability at the present value of the lease payments that are not yet paid as of the commencement date, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the Company's incremental borrowing rate. We then measure the lease liability at amortized cost using the effective interest method and remeasure it when there is a change in future lease payments.

 

(i) Asset retirement and site closure obligations

 

We record an asset retirement and site closure obligation when a legal or constructive obligation exists as a result of past events and we can make a reliable estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows required to satisfy the asset retirement and site closure obligation. Such costs include decommissioning or dismantling plant and equipment, and reclamation, closure, and post-closure monitoring of the property.

 

The estimated future cash flows are discounted to a net present value using an applicable risk-free interest rate. We accrete the provision for asset retirement and site closure obligations over time to reflect the unwinding of the discount and charge the accretion expense to profit or loss for the period.

 

We remeasure the asset retirement and site closure obligation at the end of each reporting period for changes in estimates or circumstances, such as changes in legal or regulatory requirements, increased obligations arising from additional disturbance due to mining and exploration activities, changes to cost estimates, and changes to risk-free interest rates.

 

Asset retirement and site closure obligations related to E&E activities and properties are expensed upon initial recognition and subsequently. Asset retirement and site closure obligations relating to Projects under development and construction, and to mineral properties, are initially capitalized with a charge to the related mineral property. Changes to the obligation which arise as a result of changes in estimates and assumptions are also accounted for as changes in the carrying amounts of related mining property.

 

(j) Provisions

 

We recognize provisions when (i) the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, (ii) it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and (iii) we can make a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation. Where we expect some or all of a provision to be reimbursed (for example, under an insurance contract), we recognize the reimbursement as a separate asset, but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. We present the expense relating to each provision in profit or loss net of any reimbursements.

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

If the effect of the time value of money is material, we discount the provision using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the risks specific to the liability. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as accretion expense in profit or loss.

 

(k) Share based payments

 

(i) Stock options, restricted share units (“RSUs”) and deferred share units (“DSUs”)

 

The Company grants stock options, and awards RSUs and DSUs to employees, officers and directors from time to time. At the date of grant or award, we estimate the fair values of the stock options, RSUs and DSUs which will eventually vest. These estimated fair values are recognized as share-based compensation expense over the specific vesting periods, with a corresponding increase to reserves, a component of equity.

 

We determine the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with market-related inputs as of the date of grant. The fair value of RSUs and DSUs is the market value of the underlying shares as of the date of award. Stock option grants and RSU awards with several tranches of vesting are accounted for as separate awards with different vesting periods and fair values. We account for prospectively the changes to the estimated number of awards that will eventually vest.

 

(ii) Bonus shares

 

The Company has issued bonus shares, some of which vest upon the completion of a specified period of service, and others of which vest upon the achievement of specific performance conditions, which performance conditions may or may not be market based. The fair value of the bonus shares is determined on the date of award.

 

For bonus shares which have only a service condition, the fair value is recognized in share- based compensation expense over the service period.

 

For bonus awards which have a performance condition, we estimate at the award date the length of the expected vesting period and recognize the fair value in share-based compensation expense over that expected vesting period. If the performance condition is a market condition, we do not subsequently revise the expected vesting period. However, if the performance condition is not a market condition, we revise our estimate of the length of the vesting period if subsequent information indicates such a revision is necessary.

 

(l) Income taxes

 

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. It is recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination or items recognized directly in equity or OCI.

 

(i) Current tax

 

Current tax expense comprises the expected tax payable on taxable income for the year and any adjustment to income tax payable in respect of previous years. It is measured using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current tax also includes any withholding tax arising from interest and dividends.

 

(ii) Deferred tax

 

Deferred tax is recognized in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognized for:

 

· temporary differences on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination, and at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit (tax loss);

 

· temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements to the extent that we are able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future; and

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

· taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill.

 

We recognize deferred tax assets for unused tax losses, unused tax credits and deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be used. If the amount of taxable temporary differences is insufficient to recognize a deferred tax asset in full, then future taxable profits are considered based on the business plans for the individual taxable entity. We review deferred tax assets at each reporting date and reduce them when we consider it no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized. Unrecognized deferred tax assets are reassessed at each reporting date and recognized to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be used.

 

Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the temporary differences when they reverse, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset only when there are sufficient taxable temporary differences relating to the same taxation authority and the same taxable entity which are expected to reversed in the same period or in the carried back/forward period as the expected reversal of the deductible temporary difference.

 

(m) Earnings (loss) per share

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share is based on profit (loss) attributable to common shareholders, divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period.

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on profit (loss) attributable to common shareholders, divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period after adjusting for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares.

 

(n) New accounting standards

 

(i) IFRS 16 «Leases»

 

IFRS 16 supersedes IAS 17 «Leases», IFRIC 4 «Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease», SIC-15 «Operating Leases– Incentives» and SIC-27 «Evaluating the Substance of Transactions Involving the Legal Form of a Lease».

 

The new standard provides a single lessee accounting model, requiring lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases unless the lease term is 12 months or less or the underlying asset has a very low value. Under the new standard, a lease becomes an on-balance sheet liability that attracts interest, together with a new right-of-use asset. In addition, lessees recognize a front-loaded pattern of expense for most leases, even when cash rental payments are constant.

 

Lessor accounting under IFRS 16 is substantially unchanged from IAS 17. IFRS 16 also requires lessees and lessors to make more extensive disclosures than under IAS 17.

 

The Company adopted IFRS 16 effective January 1, 2019. We did not have any material lease contracts prior to initial adoption. The adoption of IFRS 16 had no material impact on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

 

4. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS AND ESTIMATES

 

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

We review estimates and underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.

 

Page 15

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

Judgements, estimates, and assumptions that we have made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in these consolidated financial statements include:

 

(a) Functional currency

 

The functional currency for the parent entity and each of its subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of functional currency involves judgements to identify the primary economic environment. We reconsider the functional currency of each entity if there is a change in the underlying transactions, events and conditions which we used to determine the primary economic environment of that entity.

 

(b) Exploration and evaluation expenditures

 

The application of the Company’s accounting policy for E&E expenditure requires judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely from either future exploitation or sale (prior to which we expense all E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we capitalize the acquisition costs). It also requires us to make judgements on whether activities have reached a stage that permits development of the mineral resource (prior to which they are treated as E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we treat such costs as projects under development and construction).

 

We must also apply a number of estimates and assumptions, such as the determination of the quantities and types of mineral resources, which itself involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on resource classification (measured, indicated or inferred). These estimates directly impact accounting decisions related to our E&E expenditures.

 

(c) Title to mineral properties

 

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. Further, we make judgements for properties where concessions terms have expired, and a renewal application has been made and is awaiting approval. We use judgement as to whether the concession renewal application is probable to be received, but ultimately this is beyond our control. If a renewal application is not approved, we could lose rights to those concession.

 

(d) Assessment of impairment indicators

 

We apply judgement in assessing whether indicators of impairment exist for our E&E assets which could result in a test for impairment. We consider internal and external factors, such as our rights to explore, planned expenditures on E&E activities, the technical results of our E&E activities, and the potential for viable operations, to determine whether there are any indicators of impairment or reversal of a previous impairment.

 

(e) Income taxes and value added taxes

 

Our operations involve dealing with uncertainties and judgements in the application of complex tax regulations in multiple jurisdictions.

 

We recognize potential tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions and matters identified based on our judgement of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. We adjust these liabilities after considering changing facts and circumstances. However, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate outcome may result in a payment that is materially different from our estimate of the tax liabilities.

 

VAT receivables are generated on the purchase of supplies and services by our companies operating in Canada and Mexico. Timing and collection of VAT receivables is uncertain as VAT refund procedures in certain jurisdictions require a significant amount of documentation and follow-up. We are exposed to liquidity risk, credit risk and currency risk with respect to our VAT recoverable balances if tax authorities are unwilling to make payments in a timely manner pursuant to our refund filings.

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

As we are a new filer, the timing of receipt of Mexican VAT is uncertain. Consequently, we have presented it as non-current.

 

(f) Fair value measurement

 

Management uses valuation techniques in measuring the fair value of share options granted and restricted share units, deferred share units, and bonus shares awarded. Such valuation techniques are also used for estimating the fair value of the Newmont loan, which is interest free.

 

We determine the fair value of share based payments awarded using the Black Scholes option pricing model which requires us to make certain estimates, judgements, and assumptions in relation to the expected life of the share options, expected volatility, expected risk-free rate, and expected forfeiture rate.

 

Changes to these assumptions could have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

(g) Site closure provisions

 

We make estimates and assumptions in determining the provisions for asset retirement and site closure. The ultimate rehabilitation costs are uncertain, and cost estimates can vary in response to many factors, including judgements of the extent of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, and regulatory changes. We make estimates of rehabilitation costs and of cost increases, inflation rates, and discount rates. These uncertainties will result in actual future expenditures differing from the amounts currently provided. Consequently, there could be significant adjustments to the provisions established, which would affect future financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position.

 

(h) Deferred income taxes

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial statement values and tax values of assets, liabilities, loss carry forwards and other temporary differences. We make certain assumptions about such tax values, and about the future performance of the Company. We use judgement to determine the ability of the Company to utilize tax loss carry-forwards and other deferred tax assets.

 

Changes in economic conditions, metal prices and other factors could result in revisions to our estimates of the benefits to be realized, or the timing of those potential economic benefits.

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

5. EQUIPMENT

 

    Right of use
assets –
buildings
    Equipment    

Office

equipment

    Computer
equipment
    Vehicles     Total  
Cost                                                
At January 1, 2018   $     $ 272     $ 13     $ 98     $ 27     $ 410  
Additions           127       29       78             234  
Effect of movements in exchange rates           28       2       9       2       41  
At December 31, 2018           427       44       185       29       685  
Additions     116       4       5       10             135  
Effect of movements in exchange rates           (9 )     (2 )     (1 )     (1 )     (13 )
At December 31, 2019   $ 116     $ 422     $ 47     $ 194     $ 28     $ 807  
                                                 
Accumulated depreciation                                                
At January 1, 2018   $     $ 119     $ 7     $ 46     $ 4     $ 176  
Charged in the year           82       9       51       11       153  
Effect of movements in exchange rates           6       1       4       1       12  
At December 31, 2018           207       17       101       16       341  
Charged in the year     9       65       4       23       2       103  
Effect of movements in exchange rates           (7 )                       (7 )
At December 31, 2019   $ 9     $ 265     $ 21     $ 124     $ 18     $ 437  
                                                 
Net book value                                                
At December 31, 2018   $     $ 220     $ 27     $ 84     $ 13     $ 344  
At December 31, 2019   $ 107     $ 157     $ 26     $ 70     $ 10     $ 370  

 

6. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION

 

The Company’s exploration and evaluation projects consist of the Camino Rojo Project, the Cerro Quema Project, and the Monitor Gold Project.

 

(a) Camino Rojo Project

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine, and consists of eight concessions covering approximately 206,000 hectares. In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project, a gold and silver oxide heap leach project located in Zacatecas State, Mexico, from Goldcorp Inc. (now called Newmont Corporation) by:

 

· issuing 31,860,141 common shares of Orla,
· granting to Newmont a 2% net smelter royalty (the “Royalty”) on the sale of all metal production from Camino Rojo, and
· paying certain obligations, including Mexican value-added taxes, of approximately $4,923,000.

 

In addition, the Company and Newmont entered into an option agreement regarding the potential development of sulphide operations at Camino Rojo. Pursuant to the option agreement, Newmont will, subject to the applicable sulphide project meeting certain thresholds, have an option to acquire a 60% or 70% interest in the applicable sulphide project. The Royalty excludes revenue on the sale of metals produced from a sulphide project where Newmont has exercised its Sulphide Option.

 

We maintain a right of first refusal on the sale if Newmont elects to sell the Royalty, in whole or in part.

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

(b) Cerro Quema Project

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, Panama. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open pit mine with process by heap leaching.

 

In December 2016, we acquired 100% of the Cerro Quema Project by acquiring Pershimco Resources Inc. through the issuance of a combination of Orla common shares and warrants, and the assumption of Pershimco’s long term debt, which we subsequently paid off. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the current mineral resource areas, proposed mine development areas, and priority drill target areas.

 

The original 20-year terms for these concessions expired in February and March of 2017. The Company has applied for the prescribed ten year extension to these concessions as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. In March 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications had been received and that exploration work could continue while the Company awaits renewal of the concessions. As of the date of these financial statements, final concession renewals have not been received; however, we continue to receive ongoing drilling, water use, environmental and other permits, and have paid concession taxes, in the normal course.

 

(c) Monitor Gold Project

 

The Monitor Gold Project consists of three separate option agreements consisting of 422 claims covering 3,416 hectares in Nye County, Nevada, USA.

 

On January 24, 2018, we entered into an option agreement with Mountain Gold Claims LLC to acquire up to a 100% interest in 392 claims covering approximately 3,173 hectares. These claims are subject to a 3% net smelter returns royalty on specified minerals produced from these claims. We have the right to acquire, at any time, the first third of the royalty for US$1,000,000 and a second third for US$4,000,000. The agreement grants a 1% net smelter returns royalty to Mountain Gold Claims LLC on any claims owned by third parties that are acquired by the Company within a defined Area of Interest around the claims acquired under this agreement. We have the right to acquire one half of this royalty for US$4,000,000.

 

On March 21, 2018, we entered into an option agreement with King Solomon Gold LLC to acquire up to a 100% interest in 26 claims covering approximately 210 hectares. These claims are subject to a 2% net smelter returns royalty on specified minerals produced from these claims. We have the right to acquire, at any time, the first half of the royalty for US$1,000,000 and the second half for US$2,000,000.

 

On March 22, 2018, we entered into an option agreement with a subsidiary of Ely Gold Royalties Inc. to acquire up to a 100% interest in four claims covering approximately 32 hectares. These claims are subject to a 2.5% net smelter returns royalty on specified minerals produced from these claims. We have the right to acquire, at any time, 40% of the 2.5% royalty (ie, a 1% royalty, leaving a 1.5% royalty) for US$1,000,000.

 

To maintain the options, minimum payments and work commitments are required for each year to 2038. In 2019, these consisted of US$50,000 in share issuances, a US$20,000 in advance royalty payments, and US$30,000 in work commitments, all of which requirements were met by the Company. For 2020, these consist of US$40,000 in advance royalty payments, and US$75,000 in work commitments.

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

(d) Exploration and evaluation assets

 

    Camino
Rojo
   

Cerro

Quema

    Monitor
Gold
    Total  
Acquisition costs at historical rates                                
At January 1, 2018   $ 54,258     $ 109,474     $     $ 163,732  
Additions                 407       407  
At December 31, 2018 and 2019   $ 54,258     $ 109,474     $ 407     $ 164,139  
                                 
Accumulated foreign exchange on translation                                
At January 1, 2018   $ (2,470 )   $ (6,021 )   $     $ (8,491 )
Due to changes in exchange rates     4,615       8,997       22       13,634  
At December 31, 2018     2,145       2,976       22       5,143  
Due to changes in exchange rates     (487 )     (5,391 )     (21 )     (5,899 )
At December 31, 2019   $ 1,658     $ (2,415 )   $ 1     $ (756 )
                                 
Acquisition costs                                
At December 31, 2018   $ 56,403     $ 112,450     $ 429     $ 169,282  
At December 31, 2019   $ 55,916     $ 107,059     $ 408     $ 163,383  

 

(e) Exploration and evaluation expense

 

Year ended December 31, 2019  

Camino

Rojo

   

Cerro

Quema

   

Monitor

Gold

    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 203     $ 50     $     $     $ 253  
Drilling     1,557       7                   1,564  
Geological     1,157       654       47             1,858  
Engineering     2,451       20                   2,471  
Environmental     628       126                   754  
Community and government     661       473                   1,134  
Land, water use, and claims     5,676       111       213             6,000  
Project management     917                         917  
Project review                       153       153  
Site activities     1,645       652                   2,297  
Site administration     795       1,639       4             2,438  
    $ 15,690     $ 3,732     $ 264     $ 153     $ 19,839  

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2018  

Camino

Rojo

   

Cerro

Quema

   

Monitor

Gold

    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 551     $ 877     $ 57     $     $ 1,485  
Drilling     1,525       1,482                   3,007  
Geological     1,289       2,079       407             3,775  
Engineering     364       144                   508  
Environmental     247       40                   287  
Community and government     192       710                   902  
Land, water use, and claims     4,875       5       99             4,979  
Project management     338       13                   351  
Project review                       141       141  
Site activities     1,472       1,914       92             3,478  
Site administration     741       2,434                   3,175  
Recognition of reclamation obligation     300       445                   745  
    $ 11,894     $ 10,143     $ 655     $ 141     $ 22,833  

 

7. VALUE ADDED TAXES RECOVERABLE

 

Our Mexican entities pay value-added taxes (called “IVA” in Mexico) on certain goods and services we purchase. We also paid IVA in the equivalent of $4,923,000 on the initial acquisition of the Camino Rojo project, which is classified within exploration and evaluation assets as part of acquisition cost (note 6(a) and 6(d)).

 

8. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

 

    December 31,
2019
    December 31,
2018
 
Trade payables   $ 639     $ 1,341  
Payroll related liabilities     270       402  
Lease obligations – current     31        
Interest payable on Camino Rojo project loan     102        
    $ 1,042     $ 1,743  

 

9. CAMINO ROJO PROJECT LOAN

 

In December 2019, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) and certain other lenders with respect to a credit debt facility of US$125 million for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility was arranged by Trinity Capital and includes a syndicate of lenders led by Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”), Pierre Lassonde, and Trinity Capital.

 

The Credit Facility provides a total of US$125 million to the Company, available in three tranches. The first tranche of US$25 million was drawn down by the Company on December 18, 2019 upon execution of the definitive loan documentation. Tranches 2 and 3 provide US$50 million each, available for drawdown after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of certain key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo project.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

The Credit Facility is denominated in United States dollars, and bears interest at 8.80% per annum, payable quarterly commencing March 31, 2020, and is secured by all the assets of the Camino Rojo Project and the fixed assets of the Cerro Quema Project. The principal amount is due upon maturity at December 18, 2024, with no scheduled principal payments prior to maturity. The Company may prepay the loan, in full or in part, at any time during the term without penalty, by using cash flow from operations. The Credit Facility does not impose on the Company any mandatory requirements of hedging, production payments, offtake, streams, or royalties.

 

On December 18, 2019, the Company issued 32.5 million common share purchase warrants, with an exercise price of C$3.00 per warrant and an expiry date of December 18, 2026, to the lenders. At issuance date, we estimated the fair value of these warrants at $11,765,000 using a Black Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions – risk-free interest rate of 1.65%, an expected life of 7 years, an expected volatility of 35%, and an expected dividend yield of nil. We treated this as an initial transaction cost of the Credit Facility, and accordingly, we charged this to the loan obligation, with an offsetting credit to reserves.

 

    2019     2018  
    US dollars
(thousands)
    Canadian
dollars
(thousands)
    US dollars
(thousands)
   

Canadian

dollars
(thousands)

 
Balance, January 1   $     $     $     $  
Amounts drawn down during the year     25,000       32,470              
Cash transaction costs     (3,158 )     (4,147 )            
Warrants issued to the lenders     (8,968 )     (11,765 )            
Amortization of the transaction costs     86       112              
Foreign exchange           163              
 Balance, December 31   $ 12,960     $ 16,833     $     $  

 

10. NEWMONT LOAN

 

Newmont agreed to provide interest-free loans to the Company for all the annual landholding costs on the Camino Rojo project from November 7, 2017 until December 31, 2019. The loans are to be repaid upon declaration of commencement of commercial production of a heap leach operation at the Camino Rojo Project. No further advances in respect of this loan are planned or expected.

 

At our option, we may repay any amounts owing to Newmont, prior to maturity, in the form of (a) a lump sum cash payment, (b) the issuance of additional common shares of the Company, or (c) a combination of cash and shares, all provided that any issuance of common shares does not result in Newmont holding more than 19.99% of the issued and outstanding number of common shares of the Company.

 

Because the loan is non-interest bearing, for accounting purposes at date of each advance, we discount the expected payments using a risk-adjusted discount rate and estimated repayment date. A rate of 14.6% was used for the advance received during 2019 (2018 – 15.4%). Amounts received in excess of fair value on the date of the advances are credited to exploration expense.

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

    2019     2018  
   

Mexican

pesos  

(000’s)

   

Mexican

pesos

(000’s) Discounted

   

Canadian

dollars

(000’s)

   

Mexican

pesos 

 (000’s)

   

Mexican

pesos

(000’s) Discounted

   

Canadian

dollars

(000’s)

 
Balance, beginning of year     121,865       87,917     $ 6,103                 $  
Advances received     97,601       97,601       6,742       121,865       121,865       8,204  
Advances received in excess of fair value           (24,704 )     (1,707 )           (41,445 )     (2,790 )
Accretion during the year           21,886       1,473             7,497       505  
Foreign exchange                 (38 )                 184  
Balance, end of year     219,466       182,700     $ 12,573       121,865       87,917     $ 6,103  

 

11. SITE CLOSURE PROVISIONS

 

    Camino Rojo
Project
    Cerro Quema
Project
    Total  
At December 31, 2018   $ 300     $ 445     $ 745  
At December 31, 2019   $ 303     $ 445     $ 748  

 

Site closure provisions represent the present value of rehabilitation costs of exploration properties, and decommissioning costs of mine sites and related plant and equipment. The closure provisions were estimated in US dollars, and the major estimates and assumptions we used in estimating these provisions include:

 

Years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018   Camino Rojo
Project
    Cerro Quema
Project
 
Estimated settlement dates     2029 to 2033       2030 to 2032  
Undiscounted risk-adjusted cash flows   $ 327     $ 491  
US dollar inflation rate     2.1 %     2.1 %
US dollar discount rate     3.0 %     3.0 %

 

12. SHARE CAPITAL

 

(a) Authorized share capital

 

The Company’s authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares without par value and an unlimited number of preferred shares without par value.

 

(b) Issued share capital

 

In 2019, we issued 58,895 common shares, valued at $65,000, pursuant to the Monitor Gold option agreements (2018 – nil).

 

During 2019, we issued 6,167,500 common shares (2018 – 487,500) upon the exercise of warrants, for gross proceeds of $3,823,000 (2018 – $107,250).

 

During 2019, we issued 1,358,491 common shares (2018 – 657,000) upon the exercise of stock options, for gross proceeds of $1,581,000 (2018 – $136,000).

 

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

During 2019, we issued 202,667 common shares (2018 – nil) upon the vesting of RSUs (note 13(b)).

 

(c) Warrants

 

During 2019, we announced an Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program, the purpose of which was to encourage the early exercise of the Company’s warrants which are scheduled to expire on July 8, 2021 (the “July 2021 warrants”). Under the incentive program, holders of such warrants were entitled to receive one full new warrant (the "Incentive Warrant") if they exercised their July 2021 warrants prior to July 12, 2019. Each Incentive Warrant is exercisable into one common share of the Company at a price of $1.65 expiring June 12, 2022. Pursuant to this program, the Company issued 5,842,500 Incentive Warrants upon the exercise of the same number of July 2021 warrants.

 

The following summarizes information about warrants outstanding during 2019:

 

Expiry date  

Exercise

price

    December 31,
2018
    Issued     Exercised     Expired or
Cancelled
    December 31,
2019
 
February 15, 2021   $ 2.35       8,790,600                         8,790,600  
July 8, 2021   $ 0.62       6,737,500             (6,167,500 )           570,000  
June 12, 2022   $ 1.65             5,842,500                   5,842,500  
November 7, 2022   $ 1.40       3,000,000                         3,000,000  
December 18, 2026   $ 3.00             32,500,000                   32,500,000  
Total number of warrants             18,528,100       38,342,500       (6,167,500 )           50,703,100  
                                                 
Weighted average exercise price           $ 1.57     $ 2.79     $ 0.62     $     $ 2.61  

 

The following summarizes information about warrants outstanding during 2018:

 

Expiry date  

Exercise

price

    December 31,
2017
    Issued     Exercised     Expired or
Cancelled
    December 31,
2018
 
February 15, 2018   $ 0.10       375,000             (375,000 )            
October 13, 2018   $ 1.75       865,668                   (865,668 )      
December 6, 2018   $ 2.00       5,825,160                   (5,825,160 )      
February 15, 2021   $ 2.35             8,790,600                   8,790,600  
July 8, 2021   $ 0.62       6,850,000             (112,500 )           6,737,500  
November 7, 2022   $ 1.40       3,000,000                         3,000,000  
Total number of warrants             16,915,828       8,790,600       (487,500 )     (6,690,828 )     18,528,100  
                                                 
Weighted average exercise price           $ 1.28     $ 2.35     $ 0.22     $ 1.97     $ 1.57  

 

Page 24

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

13. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

 

The Company has four different forms of share-based payments for eligible recipients – stock options, restricted share units (“RSUs”), deferred share units (“DSUs”), and bonus shares.

 

    Year ended December 31  
Share based payments expense   2019     2018  
Stock options (note 13(a))   $ 1,901     $ 3,189  
Restricted share units (note 13(b))     554       243  
Deferred share units (note 0)     366       227  
Bonus shares (note 13(d))     570       326  
Share based payments expense   $ 3,391     $ 3,985  
                 
(a) Stock options

 

The purpose of the Company’s rolling stock option plan is to better align the interests of the officers, directors, employees, and consultants with those of the Company’s shareholders by linking a portion of their compensation to the Company’s performance. It also enables the Company to attract, retain and motivate experienced and qualified individuals in those positions by providing them with the opportunity to acquire common shares of the Company through the exercise of stock options. Specific details of the plan are available in our annual proxy information circular, but in general, the terms of the plan are as follows:

 

· The plan is administered by a committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.
· The number of stock options, RSUs, and DSUs outstanding at any time cannot exceed 10% of the then-outstanding number of common shares.
· Grants with exercise price less than market are not permitted.
· Expiry date may not exceed ten years from the date of grant.

 

Stock options granted by the Company typically have a five-year life, with one third each vesting on grant date, and one year and two years after grant date.

 

    2019     2018  
Stock options outstanding   Number    

Weighted average

exercise price

    Number    

Weighted average

exercise price

 
Beginning of year     9,124,005     $ 1.23       6,276,748     $ 1.13  
Granted     2,199,322       1.08       3,841,505       1.26  
Exercised     (1,358,491 )     1.16       (657,000 )     0.21  
Expired or forfeited     (47,500 )     1.48       (337,248 )     1.77  
End of year     9,917,336     $ 1.20       9,124,005     $ 1.23  
                                 
Vested, end of year     7,229,622     $ 1.22       5,426,005     $ 1.17  

 

Page 25

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

The grant date fair value of options granted during 2019 and 2018 were determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

    2019     2018  
Number granted     2,199,322       3,841,505  
Grant date fair value   $ 1,049     $ 2,202  
Weighted average of assumptions used:                
Expected volatility     49 %     50 %
Expected life     5 years       5 years  
Canadian dollar risk free interest rate     1.5 %     2.1 %
Dividends     nil       nil  

 

The stock options outstanding at December 31, 2019, were as follows:

 

Expiry date  

Exercise price
($)

    Remaining life
(years)
    Number     Number vested  
November 27, 2020     0.15       0.9       550,000       550,000  
December 3, 2020     0.81       0.9       76,000       76,000  
June 23, 2022     1.39       2.5       3,465,000       3,465,000  
May 31, 2023     1.25       3.4       1,050,000       700,000  
June 27, 2023     1.25       3.5       1,427,014       938,848  
September 10, 2023     1.25       3.7       150,000       100,000  
November 13, 2023     1.30       3.9       1,000,000       666,667  
March 29, 2024     1.06       4.2       1,978,660       659,553  
May 15, 2024     1.00       4.4       117,450       39,150  
August 13, 2024     1.65       4.6       103,212       34,404  
Total number of stock options                     9,917,336       7,229,622  
                                 

Subsequent to the reporting period, 110,000 stock options were exercised, for gross proceeds to the Company of $143,000.

 

(b) Restricted Share Units

 

On June 27, 2018, the Board approved a Restricted Share Unit (“RSU”) Plan. RSU’s are awarded to key employees. The purpose of the RSU Plan is to help retain key employees by permitting them to participate in the growth and development of the Company by awarding them common shares of the Company after completion of a specified service period. The acquisition of shares in the Company under the RSU Plan will better align their interests with the long-term interests of the shareholders of the Company. Specific details of the plan are available in our annual proxy information circular, but in general, the terms of the plan are as follows:

 

· The Board of Directors sets the terms of incentive awards under the RSU Plan.
· The maximum number of common shares available for issuance under the RSU Plan is 3,000,000.
· The Company has the sole discretion whether to settle vested RSUs by issuing common shares or cash.

 

RSUs awarded by the Company typically vest one-third each one, two, and three years after award date.

 

Page 26

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

Number of RSUs outstanding:            
             
    2019     2018  
Outstanding, January 1     368,000        
Awarded     849,639       368,000  
Vested and settled     (202,667 )     (120,000 )
Vested but not yet settled at reporting date           120,000  
Outstanding, December 31     1,014,972       368,000  
                 

 

Number of RSUs outstanding:

 

          Number vesting in the year  
    Total     2019     2020     2021     2022  
Outstanding, December 31, 2018     368,000       202,667       82,667       82,666        
Outstanding, December 31, 2019     1,014,972             365,881       365,880       283,211  

 

RSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares immediately prior to award.

 

(c) Deferred Share Units

 

On June 27, 2018, the Board approved a Deferred Share Unit (“DSU”) Plan. DSU’s are awarded to directors of the Company. The purpose of the DSU Plan is to strengthen the alignment of interests between directors and shareholders by linking a portion of annual director compensation to the future value of the Company’s common shares, in lieu of cash compensation.

 

· The Board of Directors sets the terms of incentive awards under the DSU Plan.
· DSU awards vest immediately upon award. However, DSUs can only be redeemed when the DSU holder ceases to be a director of the Company.
· The maximum number of common shares available for issuance under the DSU Plan is 2,000,000.
· The Company has the sole discretion whether to settle vested DSUs by issuing common shares or cash.

 

Number of DSUs outstanding:            
             
    2019     2018  
Outstanding, January 1     180,000        
Awarded and vested immediately     328,780       180,000  
Settled            
Outstanding, December 31     508,780       180,000  
                 
Of which, number of DSUs vested at December 31     508,780       180,000  

 

DSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares immediately prior to award.

 

(d) Bonus shares

 

During 2017, the Board of Directors awarded 500,000 common shares to the non-executive Chairman of the Company as bonus shares. The bonus shares are subject to a vesting period from June 19, 2017 to June 18, 2020 (the “Eligibility Period”). If the non-executive Chairman ceases to be the director of the Company before the Eligibility Period ends, the bonus shares will be forfeited. The bonus shares will become issuable (1) after the Eligibility Period on the date that the non-executive Chairman ceases to act as a director of the Company, or (2) upon a change of control of the Company.

 

We estimated the fair value of the bonus shares ($1.31 each) based on the market price of the common shares at the date of Board approval. Accordingly, the amount of $655,000 is being recognized on a straight line basis over the Eligibility Period.

 

Page 27

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

On November 13, 2018, the Board of Directors awarded 1,000,000 bonus shares to an officer of the Company. The bonus shares vest in four tranches of 250,000 bonus shares each, issuable upon the achievement of certain share price thresholds particular to each tranche. Upon initial recognition we estimated the dates that each of these market condition tranches would vest, such dates ranging from December 2019 to March 2022. Consequently, the award date fair value ($537,000, or $0.537 per bonus share) is being recognized over these four periods.

 

Subsequent to the December 31, 2019, the first tranche of these bonus shares achieved its vesting conditions.

 

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company’s related parties include:

 

Related party   Nature of the relationship
Key management personnel  

Key management personnel are the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and members of the Board of Directors of the Company.

 

Quantum Advisory Partners LLP (“Quantum”)  

Registered limited liability partnership, of which Paul Robertson, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is an incorporated partner.

 

The Company did not employ Mr. Robertson directly, and his services as Chief Financial Officer were provided pursuant to a professional services agreement with Quantum.

 

Besides providing the services of Mr. Robertson, Quantum provided bookkeeping and accounting services to the Company at agreed monthly quantities and rates, with additional charges for excess usage. Pricing was at normal commercial terms, with prices negotiated annually.

 

Quantum ceased to be a related party on April 30, 2018.

 

 

(a) Key Management Personnel

 

Compensation to key management personnel was as follows:

 

    Year ended December 31  
    2019     2018  
Short term incentive plans                
Salaries, management services, and consulting fees   $ 1,242     $ 1,106  
Directors’ fees     211       169  
      1,453       1,275  
Termination benefits     375       550  
Share based payments     2,745       3,132  
Total   $ 4,573     $ 4,957  

 

We did not include in the above totals for 2018 an amount of $75,000 paid to Quantum for short term incentive compensation to Mr. Robertson because this amount was declared and paid subsequent to Quantum ceasing to be a related party; however, this amount is in respect of services rendered while Quantum was a related party.

 

Page 28

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

(b) Transactions

 

The following related party transactions are included in compensation to key management personnel, above.

 

    Year ended December 31  
    2019     2018  
Quantum Advisory Partners LLP – management services   $     $ 71  

 

The Company had no other material transactions with related parties other than key management personnel during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

(c) Outstanding balances at the Reporting Date

 

At December 31, 2019, estimated accrued short term incentive compensation totaled $700,000 and was included in accrued liabilities (December 31, 2018 – $324,000).

 

15. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

The non-cash investing and financing activities of the Company include the following:

 

    2019     2018  
Financing activities                
   Shares issued for debt settlement           207  
   Stock options exercised, credited to share capital with an offset to reserves     1,413       113  
   Common shares issued upon maturity of RSUs, credited to share capital with an offset to reserves     253        
   Warrants exercised, credited to share capital with an offset to reserves     2,042       52  
   Warrants issued for transaction costs, charged to project loan with an offset to reserves     11,765        
                 
Investing activities                
   Initial recognition of right of use asset with an offset to lease obligation     106        
                 

 

16. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

(a) Reportable segments

 

The operating segments of the Company are based on the reports which are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in making strategic resource allocation decisions. These operating segments are the Panamanian projects, the Mexican projects, and the corporate office. The projects are each managed by a dedicated General Manager and management team. Additionally, the corporate office oversees the plans and activities of early stage exploration projects, such as the Monitor Gold project.

 

None of these segments as yet generate revenue from external customers, and each of the projects are focused on the exploration and evaluation of mineral properties.

 

Page 29

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

(b) Geographic segments

 

We conduct our activities in four geographic areas: Mexico, Panama, the United States, and Canada.

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At December 31, 2019                                        
   Equipment   $ 182     $ 62     $     $ 126     $ 370  
   Exploration and evaluation assets     55,916       107,059       408             163,383  

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At December 31, 2018                                        
   Equipment   $ 193     $ 117     $     $ 34     $ 344  
   Exploration and evaluation assets     56,403       112,450       429             169,282  

 

17. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

 

Our objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the exploration, evaluation, and development of our mineral properties and to maintain a flexible capital structure. In the management of capital, we include long term loans and share capital.

 

There were no changes to our policy for capital management during the year.

 

We manage our capital structure and make adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the Company’s capital structure, we may issue new shares, take on additional debt, acquire or dispose of assets, or adjust the amount of cash and short-term investments. In order to maximize ongoing development efforts, we do not currently pay dividends.

 

We have entered into a Project Finance Facility (note 9) pursuant to which we have drawn US$25 million of a total available US$125 million. The Project Finance Facility requires us to maintain a minimum working capital of US$5 million.

 

Our investment policy is to invest the Company’s excess cash in low risk financial instruments such as term deposits and higher yield savings accounts with major Canadian banks. By using this strategy, the Company preserves its cash resources and is able to marginally increase these resources through the yields on these investments. Our financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks, which include currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk.

 

Our ability to carry out our long-range strategic objectives in future years depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders, and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing exploration and development activities.

 

Page 30

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

18. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

(a) Fair value hierarchy

 

To provide an indication of the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, we classify our financial instruments into the three levels prescribed by the accounting standards.

 

Level 1   The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded equity securities) is based on quoted (unadjusted) market prices as at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Company is the closing trading price on the reporting date. Such instruments are included in Level 1.
     
Level 2   The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, we include that instrument in Level 2.
     
Level 3   If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3. We have no financial assets or liabilities included in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

 

At December 31, 2019, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying value     Quoted prices
in active
market for
identical assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Approximate
fair value due to
short term
nature of the
instrument
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                                    
   Cash and cash equivalents   FVTPL   $ 30,009     $ 30,009     $     $     $     $ 30,009  
   Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     24                         24       24  
   Restricted funds   Amortized cost     662             662                   662  
        $ 30,695       30,009     $ 662     $     $ 24     $ 30,695  
                                                     
Financial liabilities                                                    
   Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 639     $     $     $     $ 639     $ 639  
   Lease obligation   Amortized cost     88                         88       88  
   Camino Rojo project loan   Amortized cost     16,833             16,833                   16,833  
   Newmont loan   Amortized cost     12,573             12,573                   12,573  
        $ 30,133     $     $ 29,406     $     $ 727     $ 30,133  

 

Page 31

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

At December 31, 2018, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying value     Quoted prices
in active
market for
identical assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Approximate
fair value due to
short term
nature of the
instrument
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                                    
   Cash and cash equivalents   FVTPL   $ 16,686     $ 16,686     $     $     $     $ 16,686  
   Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     385                         385       385  
   Restricted funds   Amortized cost     205             205                   205  
        $ 17,276       16,686     $ 205     $     $ 385     $ 17,276  
                                                     
Financial liabilities                                                    
   Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 1,341     $     $     $     $ 1,341     $ 1,341  
   Newmont loan   Amortized cost     6,103             6,103                   6,103  
        $ 7,444     $     $ 6,103     $     $ 1,341     $ 7,444  
                                                     

 

Our policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the reporting period. As at December 31, 2019, we had no financial assets or financial liabilities which we measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

 

(b) Financial Risk Management

 

(i) Credit risk

 

Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to financial instruments fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company’s exposure to credit risk is limited to cash and reclamation deposits.

 

Our cash is held at large Canadian financial institutions in interest bearing accounts. Our reclamation deposits are held with large banks in the countries where they have been lodged. We believe that the credit risk related to our cash and reclamation deposits is negligible.

 

The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk is the carrying value of cash and reclamation deposits.

 

(ii) Liquidity risk

 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with its financial liabilities.

 

Page 32

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

At December 31, 2019, our financial liabilities had expected maturity dates as follows:

 

    Less than
3 months
    Between
3 months and
1 year
    Between
1 year and
3 years
    More than
3 years
    Total  
Financial liabilities                                        
Trade payables   $ 639     $     $     $     $ 639  
Lease obligation     10       31       58             99  
Camino Rojo project loan                       32,470       32,470  
Newmont loan                 15,104             15,104  
    $ 649     $ 31     $ 15,162     $ 32,470     $ 48,312  

 

We manage liquidity by anticipating and maintaining adequate cash balances to meet liabilities as they become due. We review cash forecasts on a regular basis to determine whether the Company will have sufficient cash to meet future working capital needs.

 

(iii) Market risk

 

Market risk is the risk that the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments will fluctuate due to changes in market prices. The significant market risks to which the Company’s financial instruments are exposed are currency risk and interest rate risk.

 

(A) Currency risk

 

The Company is exposed to currency risk to the extent that monetary assets and liabilities held by the Company are not denominated in Canadian dollars. We have not entered into any foreign currency contracts or similar arrangements to mitigate this risk.

 

Our financial instruments are held in Canadian dollars (“CAD”), US dollars (“USD”), and Mexican pesos (“MXN”). As such, our US- and Mexican-currency accounts and balances are subject to fluctuation against the Canadian dollar. Our financial instruments were denominated in the following currencies as at December 31, 2019:

 

    Canadian dollars
(thousands)
    US dollars
(thousands)
    Mexican pesos
(thousands)
 
Cash   $ 1,248     $ 22,068     $ 1,426  
Accounts receivable           2       317  
Restricted funds     69       456        
Trade payables     (448 )     (15 )     (2,493 )
Lease obligations     (88 )            
Camino Rojo project loan           (8,646 )      
Newmont loan                 (182,700 )
Total foreign currency     781       13,865       (183,450 )
Exchange rate     1.0000       1.2988       0.0688  
Equivalent Canadian dollars   $ 781     $ 18,008     $ (12,625 )

 

Page 33

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

Based on the above net exposures as at December 31, 2018, and assuming that all other variables remain constant:

 

· a 10% appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would decrease loss by $1,861,000 and
· a 10% appreciation of the Mexican peso against the Canadian dollar would increase loss by $2,958,000.
     
(B) Interest rate risk

 

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. Our cash and our reclamation deposits are held mainly in saving accounts and term deposits and therefore there is currently minimal interest rate risk. Because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments, fluctuations in market rates do not have a significant impact on estimated fair values compared to carrying value.

 

The Company’s interest rate risk arises principally from the changes in interest rates related to term deposits where our cash and reclamation deposits are held, as the Camino Rojo project loan has a fixed interest rate of 8.80% and the Newmont loan bears no interest.

 

A one percent increase in interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $218,000 to the Company’s loss for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

19. INCOME TAXES

 

(a) Tax amounts recognized in profit or loss

 

      2019       2018  
Current tax expense   $     $  
Deferred tax expense            
 Tax expense   $     $  

 

(b) Reconciliation of effective tax rate

 

Income tax expense differs from the amount that would be computed by applying the applicable Canadian statutory income tax rate to income before income taxes. The significant reasons for the differences are as follows:

 

    2019     2018  
Income (loss) before tax   $ (29,397 )   $ (29,913 )
Statutory income tax rate     26.6 %     27.0 %
                 
Expected income tax   $ (7,820 )   $ (8,077 )
Differences between Canadian and foreign tax rates     (499 )     (174 )
Items not deductible for tax purposes     304       226  
Share based compensation     902       1,076  
Change in unrecognized deductible temporary differences     6,651       6,954  
Effect of changes in tax rates from prior years     206        
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates     262        
Other     (6 )     (5 )
Total income taxes            
                 
Effective tax rate     n/a       n/a  

 

In 2019, the statutory income tax rate applicable to the Canadian parent entity decreased to 26.6% (2018 – 27.0%).

 

Page 34

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

(c) Unrecognized deductible temporary differences

 

We recognize tax benefits on losses or other deductible amounts generated in countries where the probable criteria for the recognition of deferred tax assets has been met. The Company’s unrecognized deductible temporary differences for which no deferred tax asset is recognized consist of the following amounts.

 

    December 31  
    2019     2018  
Mineral properties and exploration expenditures   $ 60,333     $ 42,972  
Equipment     2,437       2,339  
Site closure provisions     748       745  
Share issue costs     906       2,921  
Non capital losses     45,656       37,099  
Unrecognized deductible temporary differences   $ 110,080     $ 86,076  

 

(d) Tax loss carryforwards

 

Our tax losses have the following expiry dates.

 

    Tax losses   December 31  
    expire in years   2019     2018  
Canada   2026 to 2039   $ 39,986     $ 33,329  
Mexico   2027 to 2029     565       227  
Panama   2021 to 2024     4,120       2,782  
United States   indefinite     984       761  

 

 

20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

(a) Commitments

 

In December 2019, the Company received approval from the Mexican federal environment department granting the Change of Land Use permit ("Cambio de Uso de Suelo"), one of the two key permits required for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, upon payment of a prescribed fee. At December 31, 2019, the Company had committed to making the prescribed payment of $3,067,000. The payment was made subsequent to the reporting period and the permit was formally granted.

 

The Company is committed to making severance payments amounting to approximately $2,550,000 (December 31, 2018 – $3,225,000) to certain officers and management in the event of a change in control. As the likelihood of these events taking place is not determinable, such amounts are not reflected in these consolidated financial statements.

 

(b) Litigation

 

We may, from time to time, be a party to legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that, if resolved against us, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Page 35

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.40

 

March 06, 2020

 

510 Burrard St, 3rd Floor

Vancouver BC, V6C 3B9

www.computershare.com

 

To: All Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities 

 

Subject: ORLA MINING LTD. 

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

  

We advise of the following with respect to the upcoming Meeting of Security Holders for the subject Issuer:

  

Meeting Type : Annual General and Special Meeting
Record Date for Notice of Meeting : April 02, 2020
Record Date for Voting (if applicable) : April 02, 2020
Beneficial Ownership Determination Date : April 02, 2020
Meeting Date : May 13, 2020
Meeting Location (if available) : Vancouver, BC  
Issuer sending proxy related materials directly to NOBO: No

Issuer paying for delivery to OBO: 

No
   
Notice and Access (NAA) Requirements:  
NAA for Beneficial Holders No

NAA for Registered Holders

No

 

Voting Security Details:  

 

Description CUSIP Number ISIN

COMMON SHARES

68634K106 CA68634K1066
     
Sincerely,      

 

Computershare

Agent for ORLA MINING LTD.

 

 

Exhibit 99.41

 

FORM 62-103F1

 

REQUIRED DISCLOSURE UNDER THE EARLY WARNING REQUIREMENTS

 

State if the report is filed to amend information disclosed in an earlier report. Indicate the date of the report that is being amended.

 

This early warning report is being filed to update information disclosed in an early warning report filed by Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”) dated October 23, 2019.

 

Item 1 – Security and Reporting Issuer

 

1.1          State the designation of securities to which this report relates and the name and address of the head office of the issuer of the securities.

 

This report relates to the common shares (the "Common Shares") of:

 

Orla Mining Ltd. ("Orla")

595 Howe Street, Suite 202

Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 2T5.

 

1.2          State the name of the market in which the transaction or other occurrence that triggered the requirement to file this report took place.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 2 – Identity of the Acquiror

 

2.1 State the name and address of the acquiror.

 

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited

145 King Street East, Suite 400

Toronto, Ontario M5C 2Y7

 

Agnico Eagle is a senior gold mining company organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario.

 

2.2          State the date of the transaction or other occurrence that triggered the requirement to file this report and briefly describe the transaction or other occurrence.

 

On December 18, 2019, Agnico Eagle was issued 10,400,000 common share purchase warrants ("2026 Warrants") of Orla in connection with, and in consideration for the funding commitments provided by Agnico Eagle under, the loan agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) dated December 18, 2019 between, among others, Orla and Agnico Eagle (the "Issuance"). Each 2026 Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one Common Share at a price of C$3.00 at any time prior to 5:00 p.m. (Vancouver time) on December 18, 2026.

 

2.3 State the names of any joint actors.

 

Not applicable.

 

- 2 -

 

Item 3 – Interest in Securities of the Reporting Issuer

 

3.1          State the designation and number or principal amount of securities acquired or disposed of that triggered the requirement to file the report and the change in the acquiror’s security holding percentage in the class of securities.

 

See Item 2.2 above.

 

Prior to the Issuance, Agnico Eagle owned 17,613,835 Common Shares and 870,250 common share purchase warrants of Orla entitling holders thereof to acquire one Common Share at a price of C$2.35 at any time prior to February 15, 2021 (the "2021 Warrants"), representing approximately 9.47% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares on a non-diluted basis and approximately 9.89% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares on a partially-diluted basis assuming exercise of the 2021 Warrants held by Agnico Eagle. Following the Issuance, Agnico Eagle owned 17,613,835 Common Shares, 870,250 2021 Warrants and 10,400,000 2026 Warrants, representing approximately 9.47% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares on a non-diluted basis and approximately 14.64% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares on a partially- diluted basis assuming exercise of the 2021 Warrants and the 2026 Warrants held by Agnico Eagle.

 

3.2          State whether the acquiror acquired or disposed ownership of, or acquired or ceased to have control over, the securities that triggered the requirement to file the report.

 

See Item 2.2 above.

 

3.3 If the transaction involved a securities lending arrangement, state that fact.

 

Not applicable.

 

3.4          State the designation and number or principal amount of securities and the acquiror’s securityholding percentage in the class of securities, immediately before and after the transaction or other occurrence that triggered the requirement to file this report.

 

See Item 3.1 above.

 

3.5          State the designation and number or principal amount of securities and the acquiror’s securityholding percentage in the class of securities referred to in Item 3.4 over which

 

(a)           the acquiror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has ownership and control,

 

See Item 3.1 above.

 

(b)          the acquiror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has ownership but control is held by persons or companies other than the acquiror or any joint actor, and

 

Not applicable.

 

- 3 -

 

(c)           the acquiror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has exclusive or shared control but does not have ownership.

 

Not applicable.

 

3.6          If the acquiror or any of its joint actors has an interest in, or right or obligation associated with, a related financial instrument involving a security of the class of securities in respect of which disclosure is required under this item, describe the material terms of the related financial instrument and its impact on the acquiror’s securityholdings.

 

Not applicable.

 

3.7          If the acquiror or any of its joint actors is a party to a securities lending arrangement involving a security of the class of securities in respect of which disclosure is required under this item, describe the material terms of the arrangement including the duration of the arrangement, the number or principal amount of securities involved and any right to recall the securities or identical securities that have been transferred or lent under the arrangement.

 

Not applicable.

 

State if the securities lending arrangement is subject to the exception provided in section 5.7 of NI 62-104.

 

Not applicable.

 

3.8          If the acquiror or any of its joint actors is a party to an agreement, arrangement or understanding that has the effect of altering, directly or indirectly, the acquiror’s economic exposure to the security of the class of securities to which this report relates, describe the material terms of the agreement, arrangement or understanding.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 4 – Consideration Paid

 

4.1          State the value, in Canadian dollars, of any consideration paid or received per security and in total.

 

See Item 2.2 above.

 

4.2          In the case of a transaction or other occurrence that did not take place on a stock exchange or other market that represents a published market for the securities, including an issuance from treasury, disclose the nature and value, in Canadian dollars, of the consideration paid or received by the acquiror.

 

See Item 2.2 above.

 

- 4 -

 

4.3          If the securities were acquired or disposed of other than by purchase or sale, describe the method of acquisition or disposition.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 5 – Purpose of the Transaction

 

State the purpose or purposes of the acquiror and any joint actors for the acquisition or disposition of securities of the reporting issuer. Describe any plans or future intentions which the acquiror and any joint actors may have which relate to or would result in any of the following:

 

(a) the acquisition of additional securities of the reporting issuer, or the disposition of securities of the reporting issuer;
(b) a corporate transaction, such as a merger, reorganization or liquidation, involving the reporting issuer or any of its subsidiaries;
(c) a sale or transfer of a material amount of the assets of the reporting issuer or any of its subsidiaries;
(d) a change in the board of directors or management of the reporting issuer, including any plans or intentions to change the number or term of directors or to fill any existing vacancy on the board;
(e) a material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of the reporting issuer;
(f) a material change in the reporting issuer’s business or corporate structure;
(g) a change in the reporting issuer’s charter, bylaws or similar instruments or another action which might impede the acquisition of control of the reporting issuer by any person or company;
(h) a class of securities of the reporting issuer being delisted from, or ceasing to be authorized to be quoted on, a marketplace;
(i) the issuer ceasing to be a reporting issuer in any jurisdiction of Canada;
(j) a solicitation of proxies from securityholders;
(k) an action similar to any of those enumerated above.

 

Agnico Eagle acquired the Common Shares, 2021 Warrants and 2026 Warrants for investment purposes. Agnico Eagle may, from time to time, acquire additional Common Shares, common share purchase warrants or other securities of Orla or dispose of some or all of the Common Shares, common share purchase warrants or other securities of Orla that it owns at such time. Agnico Eagle currently has no other plans or intentions that relate to or would result in any of the actions listed in items (a) to (k) above, but depending on market conditions, general economic and industry conditions, trading prices of Orla's securities, Orla's business, financial condition and prospects and/or other relevant factors, Agnico Eagle may develop such plans or intentions in the future.

 

Item 6 – Agreements, Arrangements, Commitments or Understandings With Respect to Securities of the Reporting Issuer

 

Describe the material terms of any agreements, arrangements, commitments or understandings between the acquiror and a joint actor and among those persons and any person with respect to securities of the class of securities to which this report relates, including but not limited to the transfer or the voting of any of the securities, finder’s fees, joint ventures, loan or option arrangements, guarantees of profits, division of profits or loss, or the giving or withholding of proxies. Include such information for any of the securities that are pledged or otherwise subject to a contingency, the occurrence of which would give another person voting power or investment power over such securities, except that disclosure of standard default and similar provisions contained in loan agreements need not be included.

 

- 5 -

 

Agnico Eagle and Orla are party to an Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement dated December 17, 2019 (the “Investor Rights Agreement”) pursuant to which Agnico Eagle was granted, among other things, the following rights: (a) the right to participate in certain equity financings and other equity issuances by Orla in order to acquire or maintain, as applicable, up to a 15% ownership interest in Orla (with such amount being subject to reduction in accordance with the Investor Rights Agreement); and (b) the right (which it has no present intention to exercise) to nominate one person to the board of directors of Orla. In addition, the Investor Rights Agreement: (i) provides Orla with the right, subject to certain conditions and exceptions, to designate a purchaser in the event Agnico Eagle, upon notice to Orla, wishes to sell more than 5% of the Common Shares in a single transaction (or series of related transactions); and (ii) subject to certain exceptions, requires Agnico Eagle, for a period of 18 months from October 18, 2019, to either vote its Common Shares in accordance with the recommendations of Orla’s management or board of directors or abstain from voting on such matters.

 

The Loan Agreement provides for certain restrictions on Agnico Eagle’s ability to transfer the 2026 Warrants until the loan commitments provided by Agnico Eagle thereunder have been satisfied.

 

Item 7 – Change in material fact

 

If applicable, describe any change in a material fact set out in a previous report filed by the acquiror under the early warning requirements or Part 4 in respect of the reporting issuer’s securities.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 8 – Exemption

 

If the acquiror relies on an exemption from requirements in securities legislation applicable to formal bids for the transaction, state the exemption being relied on and describe the facts supporting that reliance.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 9 – Certification

 

I, as the acquiror, certify, or I, as the agent filing the report on behalf of an acquiror, certify to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, that the statements made in this report are true and complete in every respect.

 

Date: January 7, 2020

 

(signed) Chris Vollmershausen  
Name: Chris Vollmershausen  
Title: Vice-President, Legal and Corporate Secretary  

 

Exhibit 99.42

 

EX99-36_EXHPAGE099-PAGE036_PAGE001.JPG Form 45-106F1 Report of Exempt Distribution BCSC EDER Reference Number 9006152 ITEM 1 - REPORT TYPE 2019 12 30 Amended report If amended, provide filing date of report that is being amended (YYYY-MM-DD) ITEM 2 - PARTY CERTIFYING THE REPORT Indicate the party certifying the report (select only one). For guidance regarding whether an issuer is an investment fund, refer to section 1.1 of National Instrument 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure and the companion policy to NI 81-106. Investment fund issuer Issuer (other than an investment fund) Underwriter ITEM 3 - ISSUER NAME AND OTHER IDENTIFIERS Provide the following information about the issuer, or if the issuer is an investment fund, about the fund. Full legal name Orla Mining Ltd. Previous full legal name If the issuer’s name changed in the last 12 months, provide most recent previous legal name. Website http://www.orlamining.com/(if applicable) If the issuer has a legal entity identifier, provide below. Refer to Part B of the Instructions for the definition of “legal entity identifier”. Legal entity identifier If two or more issuers distributed a single security, provide the full legal name(s) of the co-issuer(s) other than the issuer named above.

 

 

 

EX99-36_EXHPAGE099-PAGE036_PAGE002.JPG 2 1 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 2 5 6 1 9

 

 

 

EX99-36_EXHPAGE099-PAGE036_PAGE003.JPG [LOGO]

 

 

 

EX99-36_EXHPAGE099-PAGE036_PAGE004.JPG ITEM 6 - INVESTMENT FUND ISSUER INFORMATION If the issuer is an investment fund, provide the following information. Investment fund manager information Full legal name Firm NRD number(if applicable) If the investment fund manager does not have a firm NRD number, provide the head office contact information of the investment fund manager. Province/State Postal code/Zip code Website (if applicable) Municipality Country Telephone number Type of investment fund Type of investment fund that most accurately identifies the issuer (select only one) . Money marketEquityFixed incomeBalanced Alternative strategies Cryptoasset Other (describe) Indicate whether one or both of the following apply to the investment fund . Invests primarily in other investment fund issuers Is a UCITs Fund¹ ¹ Undertaking for the Collective Investment of Transferable Securities funds (UCITs Funds) are investment funds regulated by the European Union (EU) directives that allow collective investment schemes to operate throughout the EU on a passport basis on authorization from one member state. Date of formation and financial year-end of the investment fund Date of formationFinancial year-end YYYYMMDDMMDD Reporting issuer status of the investment fund Is the investment fund a reporting issuer in any jurisdication of Canada?NoYes If yes, select the jurisdictions of Canada in which the investment fund is a reporting issuer. Public listing status of the investment fund If the investment fund has a CUSIP number, provide below (first 6 digits only) If the investment fund is publicly listed, provide the name of the exchange on which the investment fund's securities primarily trade. Provide only the name of an exchange and not a trading facility such as, for example, an automated trading system. Exchange name Net asset value (NAV) of the investment fund Select the NAV range of the investment fund as of the date of the most recent NAV calculation (Canadian $). $0 to under $5M$5M to under $25M$25M to under $100M YYYYMMDD

 

 

 

EX99-36_EXHPAGE099-PAGE036_PAGE005.JPG 2019 12 18 2019 12 18 Canadian $ Security code CUSIP number (if applicable) Description of security Number of securities Single or lowest price Highest price Total amount W N T Warrants. 32,500,000.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 Convertible / exchangeable security code Underlying security code Exercise price (Canadian $) Expiry date (YYYY-MM-DD) Conversion ratio Describe other items (if applicable) Lowest Highest W N T C M S 3.0000 2026-12-18 1:1 Province or country Exemption relied on Number of unique²ª purchasers Total amount (Canadian $) Alberta NI 45-106 2.3 [Accredited investor] 3 0.00 Barbados NI 45-106 2.3 [Accredited investor] 1 0.00 British Columbia NI 45-106 2.3 [Accredited investor] 4 0.00 Bermuda NI 45-106 2.3 [Accredited investor] 1 0.00 Ontario NI 45-106 2.3 [Accredited investor] 17 0.00 United States Distributions to purchasers outside of local jurisdiction (BC, AB, NB) 3 0.00 Total dollar amount of securities distributed 0.00 Total number of unique purchasers²ᵇ 29

 

 

 

EX99-36_EXHPAGE099-PAGE036_PAGE006.JPG  Province or country Net proceeds (Canadian $) Total net proceeds to the investment fund Description Date of document or other material (YYYY-MM-DD) Previously filed with or delivered to regulator? (Y/N) Date previously filed or delivered (YYYY-MM-DD)

 

 

 

EX99-36_EXHPAGE099-PAGE036_PAGE007.JPG  Province/State Postal code/Zip code Telephone number Security code 1 Security code 2 Security code 3

 

 

 

EX99-36_EXHPAGE099-PAGE036_PAGE008.JPG [LOGO]

 

 

 

EX99-36_EXHPAGE099-PAGE036_PAGE009.JPG  Chief Financial Officer 6045641852 Email address Date etienne.morin@orlamining.com /s/ "Etienne Morin" 2019 12 30 Provide the following business contact information for the individual that the securities regulatory authority or regulator may contact with any questions regarding the contents of this report, if different than the individual certifying the report in Item 10. Same as individual certifying the report Full legal name Orla Mining Ltd. Morin Etienne Family nameFirst given nameSecondary given names Email address Telephone number

 

 

 

EX99-36_EXHPAGE099-PAGE036_PAGE010.JPG Notice - Collection and use of personal information The personal information required under this form is collected on behalf of and used by the securities regulatory authority or regulator under the authority granted in securities legislation for the purposes of the administration and enforcement of the securities legislation. If you have any questions about the collection and use of this information, contact the securities regulatory authority or regulator in the local jurisdiction(s) where the report is filed, at the address(es) listed at the end of this form. The attached Schedules 1 and 2 may contain personal information of individuals and details of the distribution(s). The information in Schedules 1 and 2 will not be placed on the public file of any securities regulatory authority or regulator. However, freedom of information legislation may require the securities regulatory authority or regulator to make this information available if requested. By signing this report, the issuer/underwriter confirms that each individual listed in Schedule 1 or 2 of the report who is resident in a jurisdiction of Canada: has been notified by the issuer/underwriter of the delivery to the securities regulatory authority or regulator of the information pertaining to the individual as set out in Schedules 1 or 2, that this information is being collected by the securities regulatory authority or regulator under the authority granted in securities legislation, that this information is being collected for the purposes of the administration and enforcement of the securities legislation of the local jurisdiction, and of the title, business address and business telephone number of the public official in the local jurisdiction, as set out in this form, who can answer questions about the security regulatory authority’s or regulator’s indirect collection of the information, and has authorized the indirect collection of the information by the securities regulatory authority or regulator.

 

 

Exhibit 99.43

 

AMENDED MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT
UNDER NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 51-102

 

This material change report amends and updates the material change report filed on October 29, 2019.

 

Item 1 Name and Address of Company

 

Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Company”)

Suite 202 - 595 Howe Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6C 2T5

 

Item 2 Date of Material Change

 

October 20, 2019, as updated December 18, 2019.

 

Item 3 News Release

 

News releases with respect to the material change referred to in this report were disseminated by the Company on October 21, 2019 and December 18, 2019 through Newswire and subsequently filed on SEDAR.

 

Item 4 Summary of Material Change

 

On October 20, 2019, the Company entered into a commitment letter (the “Commitment Letter”) with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) with respect to a secured project finance facility of up to US$125 million (“Facility”) for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project located in Zacatecas, Mexico (the “Camino Rojo Project”). On December 18, 2019, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Trinity Capital and certain other lenders with respect to the Facility. The Facility is being arranged by Trinity Capital and includes a syndicate of lenders led by Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”), Pierre Lassonde and Trinity Capital.

 

Concurrent with the closing of the Facility, the Board of Directors of Orla has approved the start of construction spending at Camino Rojo. Commencement of project construction has also been approved, subject to receipt of all required permits.

 

Orla also announced that the Company has received notification from the Mexican federal government environment department known as SEMARNAT, granting approval of the Change of Land Use permit (Cambio de Uso de Suelo or CUS/ETJ), one of the two key permits required for the development of Camino Rojo.

 

Item 5 Full Description of Material Change

 

On October 20, 2019, the Company entered into the Commitment Letter with Trinity Capital with respect to the Facility for the development of the Camino Rojo Project. On December 18, 2019, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Trinity Capital and certain other lenders with respect to the Facility. The Facility is being arranged by Trinity Capital and includes a syndicate of lenders led by Agnico Eagle, Pierre Lassonde and Trinity Capital.

 

Concurrent with the closing of the Facility, the Board of Directors of Orla has approved the start of construction spending at Camino Rojo. Commencement of project construction has also been approved, subject to receipt of all required permits.

 

Orla also announced that the Company has received notification from the Mexican federal government environment department known as SEMARNAT, granting approval of the Change of Land Use permit (Cambio de Uso de Suelo or CUS/ETJ), one of the two key permits required for the development of Camino Rojo.

 

The Facility provides Orla with US$125 million comprised of three tranches; an initial tranche of US$25 million, which Orla has requested to be drawn on closing, and two subsequent tranches of US$50 million each, available for drawdown after satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the receipt of key permits required for the development of Camino Rojo. The term of the Facility is five years and bears interest at 8.8% per annum.

 

 

  - 2 -  

  

In connection with the closing of the Facility, Orla has issued 32.5 million common share purchase warrants to the lenders, with a seven year term and an exercise price of C$3.00 per warrant.

 

Key terms of the Facility include:

 

· Term of 5.0 years.

 

· Principal repayment at maturity with no scheduled amortization: the Company can prepay the loan, in full or in part, at any time during the term, without penalty, with cash flow from operations.

 

· No mandatory hedging, production payments, offtake, streams or royalties are required.

 

Multilateral Instrument 61-101

 

Mr. Chuck Jeannes, Ms. Elizabeth McGregor and Mr. David Stephens are directors of the Company, and Mr. Lassonde has beneficial ownership of, control or direction over, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company, and each are lenders under the Facility. Accordingly, the Facility and the issuance of the warrants insofar as they involve such insiders constitute related party transactions for the purposes of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (“MI 61-101”). The warrants issued to such insiders did not result in a material change to their respective shareholdings. The Facility, including the participation of the insiders and issuance of warrants in connection therewith, was considered, and ultimately approved by the board of directors of the Company on October 15, 2019 and December. The directors who participated as lenders declared and disclosed their interest and did not vote on the matter. The Company is not required to obtain a formal valuation for the Facility by virtue of section 5.4 of MI 61-101. In addition, the Company is relying on the exemption from the formal valuation and minority approval requirements of MI 61-101 set out in section 5.5(a) and section 5.7(a) of MI 61-101 as the fair market value of the Facility and the warrants insofar as it relates to interested parties is not more than 25% of market capitalization.

 

Item 6 Reliance on subsection 7.1(2) of National Instrument 51-102

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 7 Omitted Information

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 8 Executive Officer

 

For further information contact Etienne Morin at (604) 564-1852.

 

Item 9 Date of Report

 

Originally dated as of the 29th day of October, 2019, and updated this 30th day of December, 2019.

 

Hans Smit, P.Geo., Chief Operating Officer of Orla, reviewed and verified all technical and scientific information contained in the news release and is a Qualified Person within the meaning of NI 43-101.

 

 

  - 3 -  

  

Forward-looking Statements

 

This material change report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the Facility, including the expected use of proceeds; timeline for commencing construction; results of the feasibility study, including but not limited to the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plan and operations, internal rate of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present value, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; the timing and costs for production decisions; financing timelines and requirements; permitting timelines and requirements; requirements for additional land; exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources; upside opportunities including pit wall angles, land agreements, the development of the sulphide mineral resource and exploration potential; timing for start of engineering work, construction, and receipt of permits; timing for first gold production; and the Company's objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company's management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this material change report, including without limitation, assumptions regarding price of gold and silver; the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: failing to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management; failing to receive the balance of the Facility; risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, including changes in the economic parameters; risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; risks associated with executing the Company's objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses, as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company's most recently filed management's discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 28, 2019, available on www.sedar.com. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

 

 

 

 Exhibit 99.44

  

Execution Version

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT

 

 

AGNICO EAGLE MINES LIMITED

 

- and -

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

 

 

DECEMBER 17, 2019

  

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Article 1
INTERPRETATION

  

1.1 Defined Terms 2
1.2 Rules of Construction 6
1.3 Entire Agreement 6
1.4 Time of Essence 7
1.5 Governing Law and Submission to Jurisdiction 7
1.6 Severability 7
     
Article 2
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
     
2.1 Nomination Right 7
2.2 Management to Endorse and Vote 8
2.3 Directors’ Liability Insurance 8
2.4 Director Compensation 8
     
Article 3
PARTICIPATION RIGHT
     
3.1 Notice of Issuances 9
3.2 Grant of Participation Right 9
3.3 Top-up Offering 10
3.4 Exercise Notice 11
3.5 Issuance of Offered Securities and Top-up Shares 11
3.6 Reduction of Participating Percentage 12
3.7 Non-Cash Consideration 12
3.8 Issuances Not Subject to Participation Right or Top-up Right 13
     
Article 4
Representations AND Warranties
     
4.1 Representations and Warranties of the Company 13
4.2 Representations and Warranties of the Investor 14
     
Article 5
Covenants of the Company
     
5.1 Reporting Issuer Status and Listing of Common Shares 15
5.2 No Conflict With Shareholders’ Rights Plan 15
5.3 Subsidiary Security Issuances 15
5.4 Grant of Additional Third Party Participation Rights 15
     
Article 6
COVENANTS OF the INVESTOR
     
6.1 Investor Voting 16
6.2 Share Dispositions 17

 

- 2 -

 

Article 7
MISCELLANEOUS
     
7.1 Termination of Existing Agreements 18
7.2 Termination 18
7.3 Right to Information 18
7.4 Technical Assistance 19
7.5 Notices 20
7.6 Amendments and Waivers 21
7.7 Assignment 21
7.8 Successors and Assigns 21
7.9 Expenses 21
7.10 Public Disclosure 22
7.11 Further Assurances 22
7.12 Right to Injunctive Relief 22
7.13 Counterparts 22

  

 

INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT made the 17th day of December, 2019,

 

B E T W E E N:

 

AGNICO EAGLE MINES LIMITED,
a corporation existing under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario),

 

(hereinafter referred to as the “Investor”),

 

- and -

 

ORLA MINING LTD.,
a corporation existing under the Canada Business Corporations Act,

 

(hereinafter referred to as the “Company”).

 

WHEREAS the Company and the Investor are currently party to an Investor Rights Agreement made as of the 18th day of October 2019 (the “Original Agreement”);

 

AND WHEREAS the Investor owns 17,613,835 Common Shares (as defined below) and 870,250 common share purchase warrants entitling the Investor to purchase 870,250 Common Shares, which represent approximately 9.47% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares on a non-diluted basis and 9.89% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares on a partially-diluted basis;

 

AND WHEREAS the Company and the Investor were party to a Participation Right Agreement and a Technical Services Agreement (as such terms are defined below), and the Investor and the Company entered into the Original Agreement in order to, among other things, terminate and replace the Participation Right Agreement and Technical Services Agreement and establish certain additional rights and obligations between the parties set forth in the Original Agreement;

 

AND WHEREAS the Company and the Investor wish to amend and restate the Original Agreement in order to effect certain amendments to the Original Agreement, in each case, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in this Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement;

 

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in consideration of the respective covenants and agreements of the parties herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged by each party), the parties agree as follows:

 

- 2 -

  

Article 1
INTERPRETATION

  

1.1 Defined Terms

 

For the purposes of this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set out below and grammatical variations of such terms shall have corresponding meanings:

 

Act” means the Canada Business Corporations Act;

 

Additional Property Rights” means all rights, other than mining concessions, in respect of a mining project, including exploration permits, exploration rights, surface rights, water rights and other rights relating to minerals or to access minerals, and other forms of mineral title, under Applicable Laws, whether contractual, statutory or otherwise;

 

Affiliate” has the meaning ascribed to such term in the Act, as in effect on the date of this Agreement;

 

Applicable Laws” means with respect to any person, any domestic, foreign, federal, provincial, state, county or municipal or local law, rule or regulation, including any statute, regulation, rule or subordinate legislation or treaty or common law and any rule, decree, policy or enactment of any Governmental Authority that is binding or applicable to such Person;

 

Board” means the board of directors of the Company;

 

Bought Deal” means a fully underwritten offering on a bought deal basis pursuant to which an underwriter has committed to purchase securities of the Company pursuant to a “bought deal” letter prior to the filing of a preliminary prospectus or prospectus supplement or a distribution pursuant to an overnight marketed offering;

 

Business Day” means any day, other than: (a) a Saturday, Sunday or statutory holiday in the Province of Ontario or the Province of British Columbia; or (b) a day on which banks are generally closed in the Province of Ontario or the Province of British Columbia;

 

Camino Rojo Option Agreement” means the option agreement dated November 7, 2017 between the Company and Goldcorp Inc. (now Newmont Goldcorp Corporation);

 

Camino Rojo Project” means the Company’s mineral project located in Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico, including all mining concessions, Additional Property Rights and other rights to develop a mining project relating thereto;

 

Canadian Securities Laws” means the applicable securities legislation of each of the provinces and territories of Canada and all published regulations, policy statements, orders, rules, instruments, rulings and interpretation notes issued thereunder or in relation thereto, as the same may hereafter be amended from time to time or replaced;

 

Cerro Quema Project” means all mineral rights, mining concessions (including, for greater certainty the mineral concessions contracts between the Company or its subsidiaries and the Republic of Panama) and Additional Property Rights, or any rights to acquire any of the foregoing, and any amendments, additions or extensions thereto, relating to the Company’s mineral project on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province of southwestern Panama;

 

- 3 -

 

Common Shares” means the common shares in the capital of the Company issued and outstanding from time to time and includes any common shares that may be issued hereafter;

 

Company” shall have the meaning set out in the preamble hereto;

 

Confidentiality Agreement” means the confidentiality agreement dated as of October 18th, 2019 between the Company and the Investor, as amended varied or supplemented from time to time;

 

Consents” means all consents, approvals, permits, licences, waivers of rights of first refusal or waivers of due on sale clauses or other waivers, as applicable, from: (a) any party to any contract; and (b) any Governmental Authority necessary in connection with the execution of this Agreement or the performance of any terms thereof or any document delivered pursuant thereto or the completion of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;

 

Constating Documents” means, with respect to any Person, its articles or certificate of incorporation, amendment, amalgamation or continuance, memorandum and articles of association, letters patent, supplementary letters patent, by-laws, partnership agreement, limited liability Corporation or social agreement or other similar document, and all unanimous shareholder agreements, other shareholder agreements, voting trusts, pooling and/or syndicated agreements and similar contracts, arrangements and understandings applicable to the Person’s securities, all as amended, supplemented, restated and replaced from time to time;

 

Convertible Securities” means any security convertible, exchangeable or exercisable for or into, with or without consideration, Common Shares or other equity or voting securities of the Company, including any warrants, options or other rights issued by the Company and, for greater certainty, including any securities issued under any equity incentive compensation arrangements;

 

Dilutive Issuance” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(a)(i);

 

Exchange” means the TSX or such other stock exchange where the Common Shares are listed from time to time;

 

Excluded Event” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.8;

 

Exercise Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.4;

 

Existing Convertible Securities” means Convertible Securities issued prior to, and outstanding, as of the date of the Original Agreement;

 

Governmental Authority” means any: (a) multinational, federal, provincial, state, regional, municipal, local or other government, governmental or public department, ministry, central bank, court, tribunal, arbitral body, bureau or agency, domestic or foreign; (b) subdivision, agent, commission, board, or authority of any of the foregoing; or (c) quasi-governmental or private body exercising any regulatory, expropriation or taxing authority under or for the account of any of the foregoing, including any stock exchange or self-regulatory authority and, for greater certainty, the Securities Regulatory Authorities and the TSX or any other Exchange as applicable;

 

- 4 -

 

Indemnified Party” shall have the meaning set out in Section 7.4(f);

 

““Investor” shall have the meaning set out in the preamble hereto;

 

Investor Nominee” shall have the meaning set out in Section 2.1(a);

 

Issuance” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.1;

 

Losses” shall have the meaning set out in Section 7.4(f);

 

Market Price” means the “market price” of the Common Shares as such term is defined in the TSX Company Manual, or if the Common Shares are not traded on the TSX at the relevant time, the closing price of the Common Shares on the trading day immediately prior to the date of public announcement of the offering on such other exchange or marketplace as such shares are then traded (or at the “market price” otherwise determined pursuant to the rules of such other exchange or marketplace, if different);

 

Monitor Gold Option Agreements” means the option agreement dated January 24, 2018 between the Company and Mountain Gold Claims LLC, the option agreement dated March 21, 2018 between the Company and King Solomon Gold LLC and the option agreement dated March 22, 2018 between the Company and Ely Gold Royalties Inc.;

 

Notice Period” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.4;

 

Offered Securities” means any equity or voting securities, or securities convertible into, exercisable or exchangeable for equity or voting securities, of the Company;

 

Offering” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.1;

 

Offering Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.1;

 

Original Agreement” shall have the meaning set out in the recitals to this Agreement;

 

Participating Percentage” means, initially, 15%, subject to adjustment only pursuant to Section 3.6;

 

Participation Right” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.2;

 

Participation Right Agreement” means the participation right agreement dated January 26, 2018 between the Company and the Investor;

 

Person” means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, unincorporated association, unincorporated syndicate, unincorporated organization, trust, company, corporation or other body corporate, union, Governmental Authority and a natural person in his capacity as trustee, executor, administrator, or other legal representative;

 

Private Sale Purchaser” shall have the meaning set out in Section 6.2(a)(ii);

 

Projects” means the Cerro Quema Project and the Camino Rojo Project;

 

- 5 -

 

Proposed Private Sale” shall have the meaning set out in Section 6.2(a);

 

Purchaser Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 6.2(a)(ii);

 

Reporting Jurisdictions” means each of the provinces and territories of Canada;

 

Sale Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 6.2(a)(i);

 

Sale Period” shall have the meaning set out in Section 6.2(a)(ii);

 

Securities Regulatory Authorities” means the securities regulatory authority of each of the Reporting Jurisdictions, and any Exchange;

 

Technical Assistance” shall have the meaning set out in Section 7.3;

 

Technical Services Agreement” means the technical services agreement dated January 26, 2018 between the Company and the Investor;

 

Third Party” means, in relation to any party, a person with whom such party deals at “arm’s length”, as such term is understood for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada);

 

Top-up Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(b);

 

Top-up Offering” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(c);

 

Top-up Right” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(a)(i);

 

Top-up Shares” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(a)(i);

 

Top-up Threshold” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(a)(ii);

 

Transfer” includes any direct or indirect transfer, sale, exchange, assignment, endorsement, gift, bequest, disposition, mortgage, charge, pledge, encumbrance, grant of security interest or any arrangement by which possession, legal title or beneficial ownership passes from one Person to another, or to the same Person in a different capacity, in each case, whether or not voluntary and whether or not for value, and any agreement to effect any of the foregoing; and the words “Transferred” and “Transferring” and similar words have corresponding meanings;

 

TSX” means the Toronto Stock Exchange;

 

Upsize Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.4(b); and

 

Upsize Option” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.4(b).

 

- 6 -

  

1.2 Rules of Construction

  

Except as may be otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement and unless the context otherwise requires, in this Agreement:

 

(a) the terms “Agreement”, “this Agreement”, “hereto”, “hereof”, “herein”, “hereby”, “hereunder” and similar expressions refer to this Agreement in its entirety and not to any particular provision hereof;

 

(b) references to an “Article” or “Section” followed by a number or letter refer to the specified Article or Section to this Agreement;

 

(c) the division of this Agreement into articles and sections and the insertion of headings are for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of this Agreement;

 

(d) words importing the singular number only shall include the plural and vice versa and words importing the use of any gender shall include all genders;

 

(e) the word “including” is deemed to mean “including without limitation”;

 

(f) the terms “party” and “the parties” refer to a party or the parties to this Agreement;

 

(g) any reference to this Agreement means this Agreement as amended, modified, replaced or supplemented from time to time;

 

(h) any reference to a statute, regulation or rule shall be construed to be a reference thereto as the same may from time to time be amended, re-enacted or replaced, and any reference to a statute shall include any regulations or rules made thereunder;

 

(i) all references to a percentage ownership of Common Shares shall be calculated on a non-diluted basis;

 

(j) any time period within which a payment is to be made or any other action is to be taken hereunder shall be calculated excluding the day on which the period commences and including the day on which the period ends; and

 

(k) whenever any action is required to be taken or period of time is to expire on a day other than a Business Day, such action shall be taken or period shall expire on the next following Business Day.

 

1.3 Entire Agreement

 

This Agreement and the Confidentiality Agreement constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersede all prior agreements, understandings, negotiations and discussions, whether written or oral, between the parties. There are no conditions, covenants, agreements, representations, warranties or other provisions, express or implied, collateral, statutory or otherwise, relating to the subject matter hereof except as provided in the aforesaid agreements.

 

 

- 7 -

 

1.4 Time of Essence

  

Time shall be of the essence of this Agreement.

 

1.5 Governing Law and Submission to Jurisdiction

 

(a)            This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with, and the respective rights and obligations of the parties shall be governed by, the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable in that province.

 

(b)            Each of the parties irrevocably and unconditionally: (i) submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario over any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement; (ii) waives any objection that it might otherwise be entitled to assert to the jurisdiction of such courts; and (iii) agrees not to assert that such courts are not a convenient forum for the determination of any such action or proceeding.

 

1.6 Severability

 

If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, all other provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to either party. Upon such determination that any term or other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent of the parties as closely as possible in an acceptable manner to the end that transactions contemplated hereby are fulfilled to the extent possible.

 

Article 2
BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

2.1 Nomination Right

 

(a)            For so long as the Participating Percentage is at least 5%, the Investor shall be entitled to designate one nominee who shall be a Person eligible to serve as a director pursuant to the Act (an “Investor Nominee”) for election or appointment to the Board.

 

(b)            The Company covenants and agrees, within 10 Business Days’ of receiving a written notice from the Investor to the Company, to forthwith take all necessary steps, including increasing the size of the Board or causing the resignation of a director, to cause the appointment of an individual selected by the Investor to serve on the Board as the initial Investor Nominee until the next annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders, and in the event that it is necessary to seek shareholder approval for the election of the initial Investor Nominee, the Company shall call and hold a meeting of its shareholders to consider the election of the Investor Nominee as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event such meeting shall be held within 75 days of the Company receiving such written notice from the Investor.

 

(c)            The Company shall provide the Investor with notice in writing promptly upon determining the date of any meeting of shareholders at which directors of the Company are to be elected and the Investor shall advise the Company of its Investor Nominee promptly and in any event within 15 Business Days of receipt of such notice. If the Investor does not advise the Company of the identity of any Investor Nominee prior to any such deadline, then the Investor will be deemed to have nominated its incumbent nominee.

 

- 8 -

  

(d)            The Investor Nominee must consent in writing to serve as a director of the Company and meet all statutory and stock exchange requirements for membership on the Board.

 

(e)            In the event that any Investor Nominee shall cease to serve as a director of the Company, whether due to such Investor Nominee’s death, disability, resignation or removal, the Company shall cause the Board to promptly appoint a replacement Investor Nominee designated by the Investor to fill the vacancy created by such death, disability, resignation or removal, provided that the Investor remains eligible to designate an Investor Nominee.

 

2.2 Management to Endorse and Vote

 

(a)            The Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that the Investor Nominee is elected to the Board, including soliciting proxies in support of their election and taking the same actions taken by the Company to ensure the election of the other nominees selected by the Board for election to the Board.

 

(b)            The Company agrees that management of the Company shall, in respect of every meeting of the shareholders at which directors of the Company are to be elected, and at every reconvened meeting following an adjournment thereof or postponement thereof, endorse and recommend the Investor Nominee identified in the proxy materials for election to the Board, and shall vote the Common Shares and any other shares of the Company entitled to vote in the election of directors in respect of which management is granted a discretionary proxy in favour of the election of such Investor Nominee to the Board at every such meeting, and the Company shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause management to vote their Common Shares and any other shares of the Company entitled to vote in the election of directors in favour of the election of such Investor Nominee to the Board at every such meeting.

 

(c)            Forthwith following any meeting of shareholders at which an Investor Nominee was nominated to serve as a director but was not validly elected by the shareholders in accordance with the Act, the Company shall take all steps necessary to appoint an Investor Nominee to the Board who is not the same individual who was not elected at the meeting of shareholders, including pursuant to the power of the Board to appoint additional directors between shareholders’ meetings or to fill a vacancy on the Board.

 

2.3 Directors’ Liability Insurance

 

An Investor Nominee shall be entitled to the benefit of any directors’ liability insurance and indemnity to which other directors of the Company are entitled.

 

2.4 Director Compensation

 

If the Investor Nominee is an “independent director” pursuant to applicable securities laws and is not employed by or compensated by the Investor in any manner, the Investor Nominee shall be entitled to receive the same compensation, options, or other equity awards, as such awards may be granted to any other director from time-to-time by the Company on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, pursuant to the Company’s equity compensation plans as compensation for services rendered as a member of the Board. In addition, for the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Section 2.4 or any other provision of this Agreement shall prohibit, constrain or otherwise restrict the Investor Nominee from carrying out its duties as a director of the Company, including voicing the Investor Nominee’s opinion and voting on Board matters as they deem fit in the circumstances. It is further acknowledged and agreed that the Investor Nominee will be required to declare any conflicts of interest and abstain from voting on Board matters where any such conflict arises.

 

- 9 -

  

Article 3
PARTICIPATION RIGHT

 

3.1 Notice of Issuances

 

Subject to Section 3.6, and provided that the Participating Percentage is at least 5%, if the Company proposes to issue (the “Issuance”) any Offered Securities pursuant to a public offering, a private placement or otherwise (but excluding any issuances of Common Shares in respect of which the Top-up Right would be applicable) (each, an “Offering”) at any time after the date hereof, the Company will, as soon as possible after the public announcement of the Offering, but in any event not later than seven Business Days prior to the expected completion date of the Issuance, give written notice of the Issuance (the “Offering Notice”) to the Investor including, to the extent known by the Company, full particulars of the Offering, including the number of Offered Securities, the rights, privileges, restrictions, terms and conditions of the Offered Securities, the price per Offered Security to be issued under the Offering, the expected use of proceeds of the Offering and the expected closing date of the Offering. The Offering Notice shall also include copies of any investor presentation, prospectus or offering memorandum or similar disclosure document, subscription agreement and other materials delivered by or proposed to be delivered by the Company (or by any agent or investment dealer acting on behalf of the Company) to potential subscribers under the Offering.

 

3.2 Grant of Participation Right

 

(a)            The Company agrees that, subject to Section 3.6 and provided that the Participating Percentage is at least 5%, the Investor (directly or through an Affiliate) has the right (the “Participation Right”) to subscribe for and to be issued as part of an Offering at the subscription price per Offered Security pursuant to the Offering and otherwise on substantially the terms and conditions of the Offering (provided that, if the Investor is prohibited by Canadian Securities Laws or other Applicable Laws or the rules of any stock exchange from participating on substantially the terms and conditions of the Offering, the Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to enable the Investor to participate on terms and conditions that are as substantially similar as circumstances permit):

 

(i) in the case of an Offering of Common Shares, up to such number of Common Shares that will allow the Investor (at its election and in its sole discretion) to maintain or acquire up to, as applicable, a percentage ownership interest in the Common Shares equal to the Participating Percentage; and

 

(ii) in the case of an Offering of Offered Securities (other than Common Shares), up to such number of Offered Securities that will (after giving effect to the Offering and assuming, for all purposes of this Section 3.2(a)(ii), the conversion, exercise or exchange of all of the convertible, exercisable or exchangeable Offered Securities issued in connection with the Offering and issuable pursuant to this Section 3.2) allow the Investor (at its election and in its sole discretion) to maintain or acquire up to, as applicable, a percentage ownership interest in the Common Shares equal to the Participating Percentage.

  

- 10 -

 

(b)            If, upon the exercise by the Investor of its Participation Right, the Investor becomes entitled to a fractional interest in an Offered Security, any such fractional Offered Security that is: (i) less than 0.5 of an Offered Security will be rounded down to the nearest whole Offered Security, and (ii) 0.5, or greater, of an Offered Security will be rounded up to the nearest whole Offered Security unless the Investor holds less than 10% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares and such rounding would result, in and of itself, in the Investor holding 10% or more of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.

 

3.3 Top-up Offering

 

(a)            Without limiting Section 3.2, the Company agrees that, subject to the terms of this Section 3.3:

 

(i) the Investor (directly or through an Affiliate) has the right (the “Top-up Right”) to subscribe for and to be issued in connection with the issuance of Common Shares pursuant to the Monitor Gold Option Agreements and on the conversion, exercise or exchange of Convertible Securities (a “Dilutive Issuance”) up to such number of Common Shares that will allow the Investor (at its election and in its sole discretion) to maintain or acquire up to, as applicable, a percentage ownership interest in the Common Shares equal to the Participating Percentage, in each case after giving effect to such Dilutive Issuance (the “Top-up Shares”); and

 

(ii) the Top-up Right shall be exercisable from time to time following Dilutive Issuances that result in the reduction of the Investor’s percentage ownership interest by 1.0%, in the aggregate (the “Top-up Threshold”). The Top-up Threshold shall be calculated by aggregating all Dilutive Issuances that occurred in each case from the later of (A) the date of the Original Agreement, (B) the date of the last Top-up Notice or (C) the date of completion of the last Top-up Offering.

 

(b)            Subject to Section 3.3(d), within 10 Business Days of the end of each of the first and third fiscal quarters, provided that during such fiscal quarter or during the previous fiscal quarter one or more Dilutive Issuances occurred resulting in the Top-up Threshold being achieved, the Company shall deliver a written notice (a “Top-up Notice”) to the Investor containing the number of Existing Convertible Securities converted, exercised or exchanged into Common Shares, and the total number of issued and outstanding Common Shares following such Dilutive Issuances and any other conversions, exercises and exchanges of Convertible Securities, in each case from the later of (A) the date of the Original Agreement, (B) the date of the last Top-up Notice or (C) the date of completion of the last Top-up Offering.

 

(c)            If the Investor delivers an Exercise Notice in accordance with Section 3.4, the Company shall in accordance with the provisions of this Article 3, promptly, and in any event within 30 days of the date on which the relevant Top-up Notice was delivered, complete an offering to the Investor of the number of Top-up Shares the Investor wishes to subscribe for pursuant to the Top-up Right, as specified in the Exercise Notice, at an offering price per Top-up Share equal to the Market Price of the Common Shares on or after the date the Top-up Notice was delivered to the Investor (each, a “Top-up Offering”). For greater certainty, each Top-up Offering will be an offering of Common Shares.

 

- 11 -

  

(d)            Notwithstanding Section 3.3(a), 3.3(b) or 3.3(c), if a Top-up Threshold is achieved in, or is determined by the Company, acting reasonably, to be likely to occur prior to the end of, a fiscal quarter prior to setting the record date for any meeting of shareholders, the Company shall deliver a Top-up Notice to the Investor and, if the Investor delivers an Exercise Notice in accordance with Section 3.4 in response to a Top-up Notice delivered pursuant to this Section 3.3(d), the Company shall in accordance with the provisions of this Article 3, promptly, and in any event prior to declaring the record date for such shareholder meeting, complete a Top-up Offering to the Investor.

 

3.4 Exercise Notice

 

(a)            If the Investor wishes to exercise the Participation Right or the Top-up Right, the Investor shall give written notice to the Company (the “Exercise Notice”) of its intention to exercise such right and of the number of Offered Securities or Top-up Shares the Investor wishes to subscribe for and purchase pursuant to the Participation Right or the Top-up Right, as applicable. The Investor shall deliver an Exercise Notice to subscribe to the Offering, Issuance or issuance of Top-up Shares, within five Business Days after the date of receipt of an Offering Notice, Top-up Notice or Upsize Notice, as applicable, or in the case of a public offering that is a Bought Deal, within two Business Days of receipt of an Offering Notice or Upsize Notice (the “Notice Period”), failing which the Investor will not be entitled to exercise the Participation Right or the Top-up Right in respect of such Offering, Issuance or issuance of Top-up Shares.

 

(b)            If the Company at any time proposes to increase the number of any Offered Securities to be issued in the Offering it shall, by notice in writing delivered to the Investor (the “Upsize Notice”), give the Investor the option to subscribe for its pro rata share of the additional Offered Securities (the “Upsize Option”). The Investor shall be entitled to exercise the Upsize Option by delivering a new Exercise Notice to the Company. If no new Exercise Notice is delivered by the Investor to the Company within one Business Day of receipt by the Investor of the Upsize Notice, the Exercise Notice of the Investor delivered in respect of the original Offering Notice shall continue in full force and effect.

 

3.5 Issuance of Offered Securities and Top-up Shares

 

(a)            If the Company receives an Exercise Notice from the Investor within the Notice Period, then the Company shall, subject to:

 

(i) the receipt and continued effectiveness of all required approvals (including the approval(s) of the TSX and any other stock exchange on which the Common Shares are then listed and/or traded and any required approvals under Canadian Securities Laws and any shareholder approval required under Applicable Laws), which approvals the Company shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to promptly obtain (including by applying for any necessary price protection confirmations, seeking shareholder approval (if required) in the manner described below, and using its commercially reasonable efforts to cause management and each member of the Board to vote their Common Shares and any shares of the Company entitled to vote in the matter and all votes received by proxy in favour of the issuance of the Offered Securities or the Top-up Shares, as applicable, to the Investor); and

 

- 12 -

  

(ii) the completion of the relevant Offering, if applicable,

 

issue to the Investor or its nominee, against payment of the subscription price payable in respect thereof, that number of Offered Securities or Top-Up Shares, as applicable, set out in the Exercise Notice.

 

(b)            The parties agree that the issuance of any Offered Securities to the Investor pursuant to this Section 3.5 shall occur concurrently with the completion of the associated Offering, provided that if shareholder approval is sought pursuant to Section 3.5(c), the issuance of any Offered Securities to the Investor requiring such approval shall occur as soon as reasonably practicable following the meeting of shareholders.

 

(c)            If the Company is required by the Exchange or otherwise under Applicable Laws to seek shareholder approval for the issuance of the Offered Securities or the Top-up Shares, as applicable, to the Investor or its nominee, then the Company shall, in its sole discretion, either: (i) terminate the Offering, or (ii) call and hold a meeting of its shareholders to consider the issuance of the Offered Securities or the Top-up Shares, as applicable, to the Investor as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event such meeting shall be held within 75 days after the date that the Company is first advised by the TSX or other applicable Governmental Authority that it will require shareholder approval, in which case the Company shall recommend approval of the issuance of the Offered Securities or the Top-up Shares, as applicable, to the Investor and solicit proxies in support thereof.

 

3.6 Reduction of Participating Percentage

 

If the Investor elects not to exercise the Participation Right in respect of an Offering of Common Shares (other than an Excluded Event) for which the Company has delivered to the Investor an Offering Notice in accordance with Section 3.2, the Participating Percentage shall be reduced to be the amount equal to the percentage determined by dividing (a) the number of Common Shares then held by the Investor and its Affiliates plus the number of Common Shares issuable upon exercise of securities convertible into or otherwise exchangeable for equity or voting securities of the Company then held by the Investor by (b) the total number of issued and outstanding Common Shares plus the number of Common Shares issuable upon exercise of the securities issued in connection with the Offering that are convertible into or otherwise exchangeable for equity or voting securities of the Company, in each case following completion of such Offering.

 

3.7 Non-Cash Consideration

 

If the Offered Securities being issued under an Offering are to be issued for consideration other than cash consideration, the consideration per Offered Security payable by the Investor upon exercise of its Participation Right shall be the cash equivalent of the fair market value of the non-cash consideration per Offered Security to be paid by the other acquirors under the Offering, as determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, acting reasonably and with the advice of its financial advisors.

 

- 13 -

 

3.8 Issuances Not Subject to Participation Right or Top-up Right

  

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Participation Right shall only apply to an Offering for which the Company anticipates that the majority of the cash or non-cash consideration of the Offering is to be applied or is intended for the purposes of the advancement of one or both of the Projects (any other Offering being, an “Excluded Event”), provided however that should the Company in fact apply a majority of the net proceeds of any Excluded Event to the advancement of one or both of the Projects, the Company shall promptly notify the Investor in writing and the Investor shall have the right to purchase an amount of Offered Securities at the time of the next Offering sufficient to increase its percentage holding of securities to the Participating Percentage in effect immediately prior to the completion of such Excluded Event at a price per security equal to the price under such Excluded Event, and the Company shall, if it is required by the Exchange or otherwise under Applicable Laws to seek shareholder approval for the Offering of the securities to the Investor or its nominee, call and hold a meeting of its shareholders to consider the Offering of the securities to the Investor as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event, such meeting shall be held within 75 days of the date that the Company is first advised that it will require shareholder approval, in which case the Company shall recommend approval of the Offering of the securities and shall solicit proxies in support thereof.

 

Article 4
Representations AND Warranties

 

4.1 Representations and Warranties of the Company

 

The Company represents and warrants to the Investor as follows and acknowledges and agrees that the Investor is relying on such representations and warranties to enter into this Agreement:

 

(a) Organization and Status. The Company is duly incorporated and organized, and is validly subsisting, under the laws of Canada and is up-to-date in the filing of all corporate and similar returns under the laws of that jurisdiction.

 

(b) Corporate Power. The Company has all necessary corporate power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder.

 

(c) Authorization. All necessary corporate action has been taken by the Company to authorize the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance of its obligations hereunder.

 

(d) Enforceability. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Company and (assuming due execution and delivery by the Investor) constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as that enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency and other similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and except that equitable remedies may be granted only in the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction.

 

(e) Absence of Conflict. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company and the performance by the Company of its obligations hereunder will not (whether after the passage of time or notice or both) conflict with, result in a violation or breach of, constitute a default or require any Consent (other than such as has already been obtained) to be obtained under, or give rise to any termination rights or payment obligation under, any provision of:

  

- 14 -

 

  (i) to the knowledge of the Company, (i) any judgment, decree, order or award of any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over it, or (ii) any Applicable Law;

 

 (ii) any provision of its Constating Documents or resolutions of its board of directors (or any committee thereof) or shareholders; or

 

(iii) any license or registration or any agreement, contract or commitment, written or oral which the Company is a party or subject to or bound by.

 

(f) Terms of Participation Right. As at the date hereof, other than as disclosed to the Investor, the Company has not granted to any Person a participation right in respect of any Offering (a “Third Party Participation Right”) on terms that are more favourable to such Person than the terms of the Participation Right under Article 3 are to the Investor.

 

4.2 Representations and Warranties of the Investor

 

The Investor represents and warrants to the Company as follows and acknowledges and agrees that the Company is relying on such representations and warranties to enter into this Agreement:

 

(a) Organization and Status. The Investor is duly incorporated and organized, and is validly subsisting, under the laws of Ontario and is up-to-date in the filing of all corporate and similar returns under the laws of that jurisdiction.

 

(b) Corporate Power. The Investor has all necessary corporate power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder.

 

(c) Authorization. All necessary corporate action has been taken by the Investor to authorize the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance of its obligations hereunder.

 

(d) Enforceability. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Investor and (assuming due execution and delivery by the Company) constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Investor, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as that enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency and other similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and except that equitable remedies may be granted only in the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction.

 

(e) Absence of Conflict. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Investor and the performance by the Investor of its obligations hereunder will not (whether after the passage of time or notice or both) conflict with, result in a violation or breach of, constitute a default or require any Consent (other than such as has already been obtained) to be obtained under, or give rise to any termination rights or payment obligation under, any provision of:

  

- 15 -

  

  (i) to the knowledge of the Investor, any judgment, decree, order or award of any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over it;

 

 (ii) any provision of its Constating Documents or resolutions of its board of directors (or any committee thereof) or shareholders; or

 

(iii) any license or registration or any agreement, contract or commitment, written or oral which the Investor is a party or subject to or bound by.

 

Article 5
Covenants of the Company

 

5.1 Reporting Issuer Status and Listing of Common Shares

 

The Company shall, for a period of two years from the date of the Original Agreement, use commercially reasonable efforts to:

 

(a) maintain the Company’s status as a “reporting issuer” not in default under the Canadian Securities Laws in each of the Reporting Jurisdictions; and

 

(b) maintain the listing of the Common Shares on the TSX or another stock exchange in North America,

 

provided that these covenants shall not restrict or prevent the Company from engaging in or completing any transaction which would result in the Company ceasing to be a “reporting issuer” or the Common Shares ceasing to be listed on any of the foregoing stock exchanges so long as the holders of Common Shares receive cash or securities of an entity which is listed on any of the foregoing stock exchanges or the holders of the Common Shares have approved the transaction.

 

5.2 No Conflict With Shareholders’ Rights Plan

 

The Company covenants and agrees that any shareholder rights plan or similar instrument adopted by the Company shall not restrict, limit, prohibit or conflict with the exercise by the Investor of its Participation Right or Top-up Right.

 

5.3 Subsidiary Security Issuances

 

Other than pursuant to the Camino Rojo Option Agreement, the Company shall not agree to, undertake or cause, or permit to occur, any offering, sale, transfer or issuance of any securities of any subsidiary to any Person other than the Company or an Affiliate of the Company. The Company shall cause its subsidiaries to conduct their business and affairs in a manner consistent with, and so as to give full effect to, all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

 

5.4 Grant of Additional Third Party Participation Rights

 

If the Participating Percentage is at least 5.0% and the Company grants to any Person a Third Party Participation Right on terms that are more favourable to such Person than the terms of the Participation Right under Article 3 are to the Investor, the Company shall promptly, but no later than three Business Days after granting such Third Party Participation Right: (i) notify the Investor in writing of such Third Party Participation Right; and (ii) offer to amend the terms of this Agreement to provide the Investor with a participation right that is substantially equivalent to the Third Party Participation Right.

 

- 16 -

   

Article 6
COVENANTS OF the INVESTOR

 

6.1 Investor Voting

 

The Investor agrees, for a period of 18 months from the date of the Original Agreement, that it shall use commercially reasonable efforts to, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its Affiliates to, in respect of any matter submitted to the shareholders at a meeting of the shareholders or any action by written consent of the shareholders, including in respect of the election of management’s nominees for directors of the Company, either to vote for (or cause to be voted) all of the Common Shares held by it from time to time in accordance with the recommendations of the Board or management of the Company or to abstain from voting such Common Shares on such matter; except that the foregoing shall not apply in the case of voting or actions by written consent in respect of, in connection with or related to:

 

(a) any issuer bid, insider bid, related party transaction or business combination within the meaning of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions or any take-over bid within the meaning of National Instrument 62-104 – Take-Over Bids and Issuer Bids;

 

(b) any amendment to the Constating Documents of the Company, other than immaterial changes that are administrative in nature;

 

(c) any matter in relation to which a recognized proxy advisor is recommending against the recommendation of management of the Company or the Board on any resolution of shareholders;

 

(d) any disposition of: (i) the Company’s direct or indirect interest in either of the Projects; or (ii) assets for consideration equal to or greater than 50% of the market capitalization of the Company immediately prior to the entering into of such transaction;

  

(e) any proposed distribution of Common Shares or Convertible Securities where the number of Common Shares issued or issuable thereunder is greater than 25% of the Common Shares which are outstanding (on a non-diluted basis) immediately prior to the closing thereof; or

 

(f) in any circumstances where:

 

 (i) the Company, its Affiliates or their respective directors and officers are not in compliance with this Agreement; or

 

(ii) the Company, its Affiliates or their respective directors and officers are not in compliance with all Applicable Laws (including, without limitation, applicable Canadian Securities Laws or the rules and policies of the Exchange), except for immaterial non-compliance on an isolated basis that is cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the Investor within 30 days,

 

in which case the Investor shall be entitled to vote its Common Shares at its sole discretion. For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, any Investor Nominee on the Board will not be required to vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board or management of the Company but will exercise his or her fiduciary responsibilities as a director by voting as he or she sees fit (and which discretionary voting will not, for the avoidance of doubt, be considered a breach of this Section 6.1).

 

- 17 -

  

6.2 Share Dispositions

 

(a)            Subject to Sections 6.2(b) and 6.2(c), for so long as the Participating Percentage is at least 5.0%, if the Investor or its Affiliates wish to sell more than 5% of the then issued and outstanding Common Shares in one transaction or a series of related transactions (a “Proposed Private Sale”), then:

 

  (i) the Investor shall give written notice to the Company of the Proposed Private Sale (the “Sale Notice”), which Sale Notice shall contain the total number of Common Shares proposed to be sold pursuant to the Proposed Private Sale and any other terms and conditions of such sale;

 

 (ii) except in circumstances where such designation is not reasonably possible or is not permitted by law, the Company shall have the right to designate, by notice in writing to the Investor (the “Purchaser Notice”) within five Business Days following delivery of the Sale Notice (the “Sale Period”) a single purchaser (a “Private Sale Purchaser”) who shall be acceptable to the Company and the Investor, each acting reasonably, and capable of closing, and willing to close, the Proposed Private Sale on the terms set out in the Sale Notice within eight Business Days of the receipt of the Purchaser Notice by the Investor;

 

(iii) the Investor shall in good faith negotiate with the Private Sale Purchaser a price and the other transaction terms for the Proposed Private Sale within three Business Days following receipt of the Purchaser Notice by the Investor;

 

(iv) in the event that a Purchaser Notice is delivered by the Company and the requirements set out in Sections 6.2(a)(ii) and 6.2(a)(iii) are satisfied, the Investor shall be required to complete the Proposed Private Sale with the Private Sale Purchaser; and

 

 (v) in the event that the Company fails to designate a Private Sale Purchaser within the Sale Period, or the requirements of Sections 6.2(a)(ii) and 6.2(a)(iii) are otherwise not satisfied, then the Investor may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of the Common Shares that were the subject of the applicable Sale Notice without any restriction or limitation, provided that if the Investor does not complete the Proposed Private Sale (or an alternative disposition transaction) within 120 days of the date of the Sale Notice, the provisions of this Section 6.2 shall again apply.

 

(b)            Subject to 6.2(c), the Investor shall not, without the prior consent of the Company, sell Common Shares if, to the knowledge of the Investor (after reasonable inquiry in the case of a private transaction) the purchaser, together with its Affiliates and any Person acting jointly and in concert with the purchaser (within the meaning of applicable Canadian Securities Laws), would as a result of such sale acquire more than 19.99% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares as of the closing of such sale.

 

- 18 -

  

(c)            Sections 6.2(a) and 6.2(b) do not apply to:

 

  (i) sales by the Investor of Common Shares through the facilities of the TSX;

 

 (ii) Transfers by the Investor of Common Shares to an Affiliate of the Investor, provided that such Affiliate agrees in writing to be bound by this Agreement (in which case the Affiliate will also be entitled to the Investor’s rights under this Agreement);

 

(iii) dispositions of Common Shares by the Investor pursuant to: (A) a take-over bid for which a circular has been delivered to shareholders of the Company in accordance with Canadian Securities Laws or other Applicable Laws, or (B) in connection with a statutory arrangement or other business combination involving the Company; or

 

(iv) the grant of any encumbrance in respect of all or part of the Common Shares and any Transfer of any such Common Shares by reason of the exercise of any rights, powers or remedies under or in relation to such encumbrance.

 

Article 7
MISCELLANEOUS

 

7.1 Termination of Existing Agreements

 

The Investor and the Company hereby: (i) confirms that the Participation Right Agreement and the Technical Services Agreement were terminated as of the date of the Original Agreement; and (ii) agree that the Original Agreement is hereby amended and restated as of the date hereof, in each case, without affecting the validity of, or rights and obligations of the parties arising in connection with, any action taken by the Investor or the Company in accordance with such agreements prior to the date hereof.

 

7.2 Termination

 

This Agreement, other than the rights and obligations of the parties under Section 7.4, shall terminate and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall cease immediately at such time as the Investor ceases to hold Common Shares representing at least 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares. The rights and obligations of the parties under Section 7.4 shall terminate on the date the Investor ceases to hold any Common Shares or Convertible Securities.

 

7.3 Right to Information

 

From and after the date hereof, at the request of the Investor, the Company shall provide the Investor with monthly exploration reports updating the status of the Company’s work programs on the Projects including, but not limited, reasonable access to the Company’s scientific and technical data, work plans and programs, permitting information and results of operations. The Company shall not be obligated to provide a monthly exploration report if one has not been prepared for internal use. Following the delivery of each report the Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to respond to reasonable questions and inquiries from the Investor with respect to the report and the contents thereof. The Investor agrees to treat all information provided to it pursuant to this Section 7.3 (whether disclosed in writing, orally, visually, electronically or by any other means) as Evaluation Material (as such term is defined in the Confidentiality Agreement) in accordance with the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement.

 

- 19 -

   

7.4 Technical Assistance

 

The parties acknowledge that the Investor or its Affiliates may be requested, from time to time, to provide technical assistance, advice, information or services (collectively, the “Technical Assistance”) to the Company relating to one or more of the Company’s mineral projects. Subject to any written agreement between the parties to the contrary, in connection with the provision of any such Technical Assistance by the Investor or its Affiliates, the Company hereby acknowledges and agrees as follows:

 

(a) the Investor and its Affiliates are under no obligation to provide any Technical Assistance to the Company and may cease providing Technical Assistance at any time or from time to time;

 

(b) neither the Investor nor its Affiliates will receive any remuneration in consideration for the provision of any Technical Assistance to the Company;

 

(c) without the prior written consent of the Investor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, the Company shall not, in any communication or agreement with a third party or in any public statement or publicly filed or disseminated document of the Company: (i) describe or refer to any Technical Assistance requested from or provided by the Investor or its Affiliates; or (ii) refer to the Investor or any of its Affiliates by name;

 

(d) the Investor and its Affiliates expressly disclaim and make no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or reliability of any Technical Assistance, and the Company will use the Technical Assistance at the Company’s own risk;

 

(e) in no event shall the Investor, any of its Affiliates or any of their respective directors, officers, employees or agents be liable for any indirect, special, consequential, incidental or punitive damages of any sort, loss of profits, failure to realize expected savings, loss of revenues or loss of use of any properties or capital, whether or not any such damages or claims were foreseeable, relating to, in connection with or arising out of the provision by the Investor or any of its Affiliates of Technical Assistance to the Company; and

 

(f) the Company agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Investor and each of its Affiliates, and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents (each, an “Indemnified Party”), to the full extent lawful, from and against any and all expenses, losses, claims (including shareholder actions, derivative or otherwise), actions, suits, proceedings, damages and liabilities, joint or several, including the aggregate amount paid in reasonable settlement of any actions, suits, proceedings, investigations or claims and the reasonable fees and expenses of their counsel that may be incurred in advising with respect to and/or defending any action, suit, proceeding, investigation or claim that may be made or threatened against any Indemnified Party or in enforcing this indemnity or to which any Indemnified Party may become subject or otherwise involved in any capacity under any statute or common law or otherwise (collectively, “Losses”) insofar as such Losses relate to, are caused by, result from, arise out of or are based upon, directly or indirectly, the provision of Technical Assistance by the Investor or its Affiliates. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company is not obligated to indemnify or hold harmless the Indemnified Party for any Losses if such Losses arise out of or result from the Indemnified Party’s negligence, wilful misconduct, fraud or criminal activity.

 

- 20 -

  

7.5 Notices

 

(a)            Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person, transmitted by e-mail or similar means of recorded electronic communication or sent by registered mail, charges prepaid, addressed as follows:

 

 (i) in the case of the Investor:

 

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
145 King Street East, Suite 500
Toronto, ON M5C 2Y7

 

Attention:   Carol Plummer, Vice President Corporate Development
E-mail:          
[personal information redacted] with a copy to [personal information redacted]

 

with a copy to:

 

Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP
155 Wellington Street West
Toronto, ON M5V 3J7

 

Attention:   Patricia Olasker
E-mail:          
[personal information redacted]

 

(ii) in the case of the Company:

 

Orla Mining Ltd.
202-595 Howe Street
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 2T5

 

Attention:   Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer
E-mail:          [personal information redacted]

 

- 21 -

 

 

with a copy to:

 

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Suite 2200, 885 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8

 

Attention:      Jen Hansen
E-mail:          [personal information redacted]

 

(b)            Any such notice or other communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the day on which it was delivered or transmitted (or, if such day is not a Business Day or if delivery or transmission is made on a Business Day after 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) at the place of receipt, then on the next following Business Day) or, if mailed, on the third Business Day following the date of mailing; provided, however, that if at the time of mailing or within three Business Days thereafter there is or occurs a labour dispute or other event which might reasonably be expected to disrupt the delivery of documents by mail, any notice or other communication hereunder shall be delivered or transmitted by means of recorded electronic communication as aforesaid.

 

(c)            Either party may at any time change its address for service from time to time by giving notice to the other party in accordance with this Section 7.5.

 

7.6 Amendments and Waivers

 

No amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be binding on either party unless consented to in writing by such party. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor shall any waiver of any provision of this Agreement constitute a continuing waiver unless otherwise expressly provided.

 

7.7 Assignment

 

No party may assign any of its rights or benefits under this Agreement, or delegate any of its duties or obligations, except with the prior written consent of the other party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Investor may assign and transfer all of its rights, benefits, duties and obligations under this Agreement in their entirety, without the consent of the Company, to an Affiliate of the Investor, provided that any such assignee shall, prior to any such transfer, agree to be bound by all of the covenants of the Investor contained herein and comply with the provisions of this Agreement, and shall deliver to the Company a duly executed undertaking to such effect in form and substance satisfactory to the Company, acting reasonably.

 

7.8 Successors and Assigns

 

This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and shall be binding on and enforceable by and against the parties and their respective successors or heirs, executors, administrators and other legal personal representatives, and permitted assigns.

 

7.9 Expenses

 

Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, each party will pay for its own costs and expenses incurred in connection with the negotiation, preparation, execution and performance of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated herein, including the fees and expenses of legal counsel, financial advisors, accountants, consultants and other professional advisors.

 

- 22 -

   

7.10 Public Disclosure

 

The Company shall not issue any press release or publicly filed or disseminated document referencing, in any way, the Investor, unless: (i) the Company has obtained the Investor’s prior written consent to such disclosure, which consent shall not be unreasonably delayed or withheld; or (ii) the Company determines that such disclosure is required by Applicable Law. In addition, the Company shall provide the Investor with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on each press release or publicly filed or disseminated document of the Company relating or referencing, in any way, the Investor, this Agreement or the transactions contemplated herein prior to the issuance thereof and incorporate any comments provided by the Investor, to the extent commercially reasonable. For greater certainty, the Investor hereby consents to the Company filing a copy of this Agreement on SEDAR, if required.

 

7.11 Further Assurances

 

Each of the parties shall, from time to time hereafter and upon any reasonable request of the other, promptly do, execute, deliver or cause to be done, executed and delivered all further acts, documents and things as may be required or necessary for the purposes of giving effect to this Agreement.

 

7.12 Right to Injunctive Relief

 

The parties agree that any breach of the terms of this Agreement by either party would result in immediate and irreparable injury and damage to the other party which could not be adequately compensated by damages. The parties therefore also agree that in the event of any such breach or any anticipated or threatened breach by the defaulting party, the other party shall be entitled to equitable relief, including by way of temporary or permanent injunction or specific performance, without having to prove damages, in addition to any other remedies (including damages) to which such other party may be entitled at law or in equity.

 

7.13 Counterparts

 

This Agreement and all documents contemplated by or delivered under or in connection with this Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, with the same effect as if each party had signed and delivered the same document, and all counterparts shall be construed together to be an original and will constitute one and the same agreement.

 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows.]

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by the parties on the date first written above.

  

 

  Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
   
   
  by (signed) “Chris Vollmershausen
    Name: Chris Vollmershausen
    Title: Vice-President, Legal
       
       
  ORLA MINING LTD.
   
   
  by (signed) “Etienne Morin
    Name: Etienne Morin
    Title: Chief Financial Officer

  

Signature Page – Investor Rights Agreement

 

 

Exhibit 99.45

 

Execution Copy

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
as Borrower

 

and

 

TRINITY CAPITAL PARTNERS CORPORATION
as Arranging Lender

 

and

 

GLAS USA LLC
as Administrative Agent

 

and

 

GLAS AMERICAS LLC
as Collateral Agent

 

and

 

THE PARTIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO
as Lenders

 

 

 

LOAN AGREEMENT

 

 

 

Dated as of December 18, 2019

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Article 1 INTERPRETATION 1
  1.1 Defined Terms 1
  1.2 Other Usages 20
  1.3 Plural and Singular 21
  1.4 Headings 21
  1.5 Currency 21
  1.6 Applicable Law 21
  1.7 Time of the Essence 21
  1.8 Non Banking Days 21
  1.9 Consents and Approvals 21
  1.10 Schedules 21
  1.11 Rule of Construction 22
  1.12 Accounting Terms – GAAP 22
  1.13 Permitted Encumbrances 22
       
Article 2 CREDIT FACILITY 22
  2.1 Establishment of Credit Facility 22
  2.2 Lenders’ Commitments 23
  2.3 Permanent Reduction of Credit Facility 23
  2.4 Termination of Credit Facility 23
       
Article 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO CREDITS 23
  3.1 Funding of Loans 23
  3.2 Defaulting Lender 24
  3.3 Time and Place of Payments 25
  3.4 Remittance of Payments 25
  3.5 Evidence of Indebtedness 25
  3.6 Notice Periods 25
       
Article 4 DRAWDOWNS 25
  4.1 Drawdown Notice 25
       
Article 5 INTEREST AND FEES 26
  5.1 Interest Rates 26
  5.2 Calculation and Payment of Interest 26
  5.3 General Interest Rules 26
  5.4 Commitment Fee 27
       
Article 6 replacement of Lenders, Indemnity and Tax Provisions 27
  6.1 Conditions of Credit 27
  6.2 Replacement of Lenders 28
  6.3 Indemnity for Transactional Liability 28
  6.4 Gross-Up for Taxes 29
  6.5 Environmental Indemnity 32
  6.6 Benefit of Indemnities 33

 

(i)

 

 

Article 7 REPAYMENTS AND PREPAYMENTS 33
  7.1 Repayment of Credit Facility 33
  7.2 Voluntary Prepayments under Credit Facility 33
  7.3 Prepayment Notice 33
       
Article 8 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 34
  8.1 Representations and Warranties 34
  8.2 Accredited Investor Status 40
  8.3 Survival of Representations and Warranties 40
       
Article 9 COVENANTS 40
  9.1 Affirmative Covenants 40
  9.2 Restrictive Covenants 47
  9.3 Performance of Covenants by Administrative Agent 50
       
Article 10 CONDITIONS PRECEDENT 51
  10.1 Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness of this Agreement 51
  10.2 Conditions Precedent to All Loans 53
  10.3 Conditions Precedent to Tranche Two Loan and Tranche Three Loan 54
  10.4 Waiver 56
       
Article 11 DEFAULT AND REMEDIES 56
  11.1 Events of Default 56
  11.2 Remedies Cumulative 59
  11.3 Set-Off 59
  11.4 Default Interest 60
       
Article 12 THE AGENTs 60
  12.1 Appointment and Authorization of Agents 60
  12.2 Interest Holders 60
  12.3 Consultation with Counsel 61
  12.4 Documents 61
  12.5 Responsibility of the Agents 61
  12.6 Action by the Agents 61
  12.7 Notice of Events of Default 62
  12.8 Responsibility Disclaimed 62
  12.9 Indemnification 64
  12.10 Credit Decision 64
  12.11 Successor Agent 64
  12.12 Delegation by an Agent 65
  12.13 Waivers and Amendments 65
  12.14 Determination by an Agent Conclusive and Binding 66
  12.15 Adjustments among Lenders after Acceleration 66
  12.16 Redistribution of Payment 67
  12.17 Distribution of Notices 67
  12.18 Decision to Enforce Security 67
  12.19 Enforcement 68
  12.20 Determination of Exposures 68

 

(ii)

 

 

  12.21 Application of Cash Proceeds 68
  12.22 Entering into Contracts 69
  12.23 Other Security Not Permitted 69
  12.24 Discharge of Security 69
  12.25 Survival 69
       
Article 13 MISCELLANEOUS 70
  13.1 Notices 70
  13.2 Severability 70
  13.3 Counterparts 70
  13.4 Successors and Assigns 70
  13.5 Assignment 70
  13.6 Entire Agreement 72
  13.7 Further Assurances 72
  13.8 Judgment Currency 72
  13.9 Anti-Money Laundering Legislation 73
  13.10 No Fiduciary Duty 74
  13.11 Treatment of Certain Information: Confidentiality 75

 

SCHEDULES

 

Schedule A - Lenders and Individual Commitments
Schedule B - Compliance Certificate
Schedule C - Form of Assignment
Schedule D - Form of Drawdown Notice
Schedule E - Corporate Structure
Schedule F - Relevant Jurisdictions
Schedule G - Security Documents
Schedule H - Material Agreements and Permits
Schedule I - Litigation
Schedule J - Non-Arm’s Length Transactions
Schedule K - Accredited Investor Status Certificate
Schedule L - U.S. Accredited Investor Status Certification Letter
Schedule M - Encumbrances Consisting of Royalties
Schedule N - Permitted Investments
Schedule O - Permit Exceptions
Schedule P - Permitted Debt

 

(iii)

 

 

LOAN AGREEMENT dated as of December 18, 2019 among Orla Mining Ltd., a corporation amalgamated under the Canadian Business Corporations Act (the “Borrower”), Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (the “Arranging Lender”), GLAS AMERICAS LLC, a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, as collateral agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, together with its successors and assigns in such capacity, the “Collateral Agent”), and GLAS USA LLC, a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, as administrative agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, together with its successors and assigns in such capacity, the “Administrative Agent” and together with the Collateral Agent, each an “Agent” and collectively, the “Agents”), and the parties listed on Schedule A from time to time as lenders (each, a “Lender” and, collectively, the “Lenders”).

 

WHEREAS the Borrower has requested the Lenders provide to it a certain loans for the purposes set forth in Section 9.1(e);

 

AND WHEREAS the Lenders are each willing, on a several basis, to provide such loans to the Borrower for the aforementioned purposes upon the terms and conditions contained herein;

 

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged), the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:

 

Article 1
INTERPRETATION

 

1.1 Defined Terms

 

The following defined terms shall for all purposes of this agreement, or any amendment, substitution, supplement, replacement or addition hereto, have the following respective meanings unless the context otherwise specifies or requires or unless otherwise defined herein:

 

Additional Equity” means net cash proceeds of $45,000,000 of additional capital (after deducting therefrom fees, commissions, costs and expenses and other amounts attributable to the raising of such capital) raised by the Borrower, which may not be redeemed, retracted or repaid in any manner whatsoever, and on which no fixed payments are required to be made while any Secured Obligations remain outstanding.

 

Additional Capital” means the Additional Equity and the Loans.

 

Administrative Agent” means GLAS USA LLC, in its capacity as administrative agent for the Lenders, and any successor thereto pursuant to Section 12.11.

 

Affiliate” means, with respect to a specified Person, another Person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, Controls or is Controlled by, or is under common Control with, the Person specified.

 

- 2 -

 

Agent Account” means the following United States Dollar account of the Administrative Agent:

 

[commercially sensitive information redacted]

 

or such other account as may be notified by the Administrative Agent to the other parties hereto.

 

AML Legislation” has the meaning set out in Section 13.9.

 

Anti-Corruption Laws” means all laws, rules, and regulations having the force of law of any jurisdiction applicable to any of the Obligors from time to time concerning or relating to bribery or corruption, including without limitation the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Acts (Canada).

 

Applicable Laws” means in respect of any Person, property, transaction or event, all applicable laws, standards, requirements, policies, approvals, statutes, ordinances, guidelines, treaties and regulations, and all applicable directives, orders, permits, judgments, injunctions, awards and decrees of any Governing Authority, in each case, having the force of law and binding on or affecting such Person or any of its property.

 

“Applicable Securities Laws” means, collectively, all applicable securities laws of each of the Provinces and Territories of Canada and the respective rules and regulations under such laws together with applicable published instruments, notices and orders of the securities regulatory authorities in such jurisdictions, and the rules and policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange and any other exchange or marketplace on which the Borrower has applied and been accepted for listing or quotation of its securities.

 

Arranging Lender” means Trinity Capital Partners Corporation, in its capacity as arranging lender of the Credit Facility, and its successors and assigns.

 

Arm’s Length” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto for the purposes of the Tax Act, as in effect as of the date hereof.

 

Asset Disposition” has the meaning set out in Section 9.2(h).

 

Assets” means, with respect to any Person, any and all property, assets and undertakings of such Person of every kind, real and personal, and wheresoever situate, whether now owned or hereafter acquired (and, for greater certainty, includes any equity or like interest of such Person in any other Person).

 

Banking Day” means any day, other than Saturday and Sunday, on which banks generally are open for business in Vancouver, British Columbia, Toronto, Ontario and New York, New York.

 

Bankruptcy Law” means the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada), the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada), the Winding-up and Restructuring Act (Canada), Title 11, U.S. Code and any similar federal, provincial, state or foreign law for or in respect of the relief of debtors, conservatorship, bankruptcy, general assignment for the benefit of creditors, moratorium, arrangement, receivership, insolvency, reorganization or similar laws of Canada, the United States or other applicable jurisdictions from time to time in effect and any similar federal, provincial, state or foreign law for the relief of debtors affecting the rights of creditors generally.

 

- 3 -

 

Blocked Person” means a Person which is a department, agency or instrumentality of, or is otherwise controlled by or acting on behalf of, directly or indirectly, (x) any OFAC Listed Person or (y) any Person, entity, organization, foreign country or regime that is subject to any OFAC Sanctions Program.

 

Bonding Obligations” means any reimbursement or indemnity obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business in respect of performance bonds, reclamation bonds and indemnities, surety bonds, appeal bonds, completion guarantees or like instruments (excluding letters of credit or guarantee) issued to secure performance obligations relating to the Camino Rojo Project or the Cerro Quema Project.

 

Borrower Account” means the following United States Dollar account of the Borrower, the wire transfer instructions with respect to which are as set forth below:

 

[commercially sensitive information redacted]

 

or such other account as may be notified by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent.

 

Camino Rojo” means Minera Camino Rojo, S.A. de C.V.

 

Camino Rojo Project” means the Camino Rojo Oxide, heap-leach gold project located in the municipality of Mazapil, state of Zacatecas, Mexico as defined in the June 25, 2019 feasibility study NI 43-101 technical report filed on SEDAR.

 

Canada Blocked Person” means (i) a “terrorist group” as defined for the purposes of Part II.1 of the Criminal Code (Canada), as amended, or (ii) a Person identified in or pursuant to (x) Part II.1 of the Criminal Code (Canada), as amended, or (y) regulations or orders promulgated pursuant to the Special Economic Measures Act (Canada), as amended, the United Nations Act (Canada), as amended, or the Freezing Assets of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Canada), as amended, as a Person in respect of whose property or benefit a Lender would be prohibited from entering into or facilitating a related financial transaction.

 

Canadian Sanctions Law” means the Special Economic Measures Act (Canada), the United Nations Act (Canada), the Freezing Assets of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Canada), the Criminal Code (Canada) and other similar Canadian laws imposing sanctions.

 

Capitalized Lease Obligations” means, with respect to any Person, at any time, all liabilities of such Person as lessee in respect of any lease of real or personal property, which, in accordance with GAAP (as in effect on January 1, 2019), have been or are required to be capitalized.

 

Cash Proceeds” means, at any time, the aggregate of (i) all Proceeds of Realization in the form of cash and (ii) all cash proceeds of the sale or disposition of non-cash Proceeds of Realization, in each case expressed in Dollars at such time.

 

Cerro Quema” means Minera Cerro Quema, S.A.

 

Cerro Quema Project” means the oxide, heap-leach gold project located in the Los Santos province, Republic of Panama.

 

- 4 -

 

Change of Control” means with respect to any Obligor: (y) the consummation of any transaction, including any consolidation, arrangement, amalgamation or merger or any issue, transfer or acquisition of voting shares, the result of which is that any other Person or group of other Persons acting jointly or in concert for purposes of such transaction becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the voting shares of such Obligor; or (z) if, after the Closing Date, in any twelve (12) month consecutive period, the Continuing Directors cease to constitute a majority of the board of directors of the Borrower; provided that it shall not be a Change of Control where the Arranging Lender or any Affiliate thereof, acting jointly or in concert, acquires control of the applicable Obligor.

 

Closing Date” means the date of execution and delivery of this agreement and upon which all conditions precedent in Section 10.1 have been satisfied.

 

Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

 

Collateral Agent” means GLAS Americas LLC, in its capacity as collateral agent for the Lenders, and any successor thereto pursuant to Section 12.11.

 

Commitment Fee” has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 5.4.

 

Continuing Directors” means (a) any member of the board of directors who was a director of the Borrower on the Closing Date, and (b) any individual who becomes a member of the board of directors of the Borrower after the Closing Date if such individual was approved, appointed or nominated for the election to the board of directors of the Borrower by a majority of the Continuing Directors.

 

Control” means the possession, directly or indirectly of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of a Person, whether through the ability to exercise voting power, by contract or otherwise. “Controlling” and “Controlled” have corresponding meanings.

 

Credit Documents” means this agreement, the Guarantees and the Security Documents and “Credit Document” means any of the Credit Documents.

 

Credit Facility” has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 2.1.

 

Debt” means, with respect to a Person, without duplication, the following amounts, each calculated in accordance with GAAP, unless the context otherwise requires:

 

(a) all obligations of such Person that would be considered to be indebtedness for borrowed money (including, without limitation, by way of overdraft and drafts or orders accepted representing extensions of credit), and all obligations of such Person (whether or not with respect to the borrowing of money) that are evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or other similar instruments;

 

(b) reimbursement obligations under bankers’ acceptances and contingent obligations of such Person in respect of any letter of credit, letters of guarantee or similar instruments;

 

(c) Bonding Obligations of such Person;

 

- 5 -

 

(d) any Equity Interests of that Person which Equity Interests, by their terms (or by the terms of any security into which it is convertible or for which it is exchangeable at the option of the holder), or upon the happening of any event, matures or is mandatorily redeemable, pursuant to a sinking fund obligation or otherwise, or is redeemable at the option of the holder thereof, in whole or in part, prior to the Maturity Date, for cash or securities constituting Debt (read without reference to this subsection (d)) unless the issuer of such Equity Interests has by the terms of such Equity Interests the option of repaying such amounts or retiring or exchanging such Equity Interests with Equity Interests not convertible or exchangeable or redeemable for Debt (read without reference to this subsection (d));

 

(e) all obligations of such Person for the deferred purchase price of Assets or services which constitute indebtedness (other than trade accounts payable and accrued expenses arising in the ordinary course of business);

 

(f) all Capitalized Lease Obligations of such Person, obligations under synthetic leases, obligations under sale and leaseback transactions (unless the lease component of the sale and leaseback transaction is an operating lease) and indebtedness under arrangements relating to purchase money liens and other obligations in respect of the deferred purchase price of property and services;

 

(g) all Hedge Exposure of such Person; and

 

(h) the amount of the contingent obligations of such Person under any guarantee (other than by endorsement of negotiable instruments for collection or deposit in the ordinary course), indemnity or other financial assistance or other agreement assuring payment or performance of, any obligation in any manner of any part or all of an obligation of another Person of the type included in subsections (a) through (g) above;

 

but excluding, for greater certainty, trade payables and accrued liabilities that are current liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business for which payment is due within 60 days of the date of any invoice or payment request related thereto; unearned revenue; current and deferred taxes shall not constitute Debt, and, for greater certainty, the stated amount of a letter of credit or any other letter of credit or guarantee shall not be included to the extent that the obligation in respect of which it has been issued is included in one of items (a) to (h) above.

 

Default” means any event, fact or circumstance which is or which, with the passage of time, the giving of notice or both, would be an Event of Default.

 

Defaulting Lender” means any Lender that (a) has failed to fund any portion of the Loans required to be funded by it hereunder within three Banking Days of the date required to be funded by it hereunder unless such failure has been cured, (b) has otherwise failed to pay over to the Administrative Agent or any other Lender any other amount required to be paid by it hereunder within three Banking Days of the date when due, unless the subject of a good faith dispute or unless such failure has been cured, (c) has been determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or regulator to be insolvent or is unable to meet its obligations or admits in writing it is unable to pay its debts as they generally become due, (d) is the subject of a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding, (e) is subject to or is seeking the appointment of an administrator, regulator, conservator, liquidator, receiver, trustee, custodian or other similar official over any portion of its assets or business, or (f) fails to confirm in writing that it will comply with its obligations hereunder after written request from the Administrative Agent or the Borrower, or a Lender who provides notice in writing, or makes a public statement to the effect that (i) it does not intend to comply with its funding obligations hereunder or (ii) it does not intend to generally comply with any of its funding obligations under other agreements (unless such writing or public statement indicates that such position is based on such Lender’s good faith determination that a condition precedent to extending credit hereunder (specifically identified in such writing including, if applicable, by reference to a specific Default) cannot be satisfied).

 

- 6 -

 

“Disclosure Documents” means, collectively, all of the documents which have been filed by or on behalf of the Borrower since January 1, 2017 and prior to the date hereof with the relevant securities commissions pursuant to the Applicable Securities Laws, including all documents filed by the Borrower on www.sedar.com.

 

Distribution” means, with respect to any Person, (i) any dividend or other distribution, direct or indirect, declared or paid on issued Equity Interests of such Person, (ii) any payment (in any form whatsoever) made on account of any redemption, exchange, retirement, purchase or other acquisition for value, and any payment by such Person on account of a sinking fund or similar payment for the redemption, exchange, retirement, purchase or other acquisition for value, direct or indirect, made or paid in respect of the issued Equity Interests of such Person now or hereafter outstanding, (iii) any payment made to retire, or to obtain the surrender of, any outstanding or other rights to acquire issued, Equity Interests of any Obligor now or hereafter outstanding, and (iv) the payment by any Obligor of any royalty, consulting fee, management fee, bonus or similar fee to the shareholders or any Affiliate of such Person, except as otherwise not restricted in accordance with the terms of Section 9.2(r).

 

Dollars” or “$” means the lawful currency of the United States of America.

 

Drawdown Notice” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 4.1.

 

Encumbrance” means, with respect to any property or Asset, any mortgage, encumbrance, deed of trust, defeasance arrangement, trust arrangement, statutory or deemed trust, assignment, royalty, adverse claim, netting arrangement or right of set-off, pledge, charge, security interest, hypothec, usufruct or encumbrance of any kind or other arrangement, in each case, having the effect of security for the payment or performance of any debt, liability or obligation in respect of such property or Asset, whether or not filed, recorded or otherwise perfected under Applicable Law, including any conditional sale or other title retention agreement, any lease in the nature thereof, including title reservations, limitations, provisos or conditions.

 

Enforcement Date” means the date on which the Administrative Agent notifies the Borrower, pursuant to and as then authorized by Section 11.1, that all Secured Obligations owing to the Lenders have become immediately due and payable or on which such Secured Obligations automatically become due and payable pursuant to Section 11.1, whichever occurs first.

 

- 7 -

 

Environmental Claims” means any and all administrative, regulatory or judicial actions, suits, demands, claims, liens, notices of non compliance or violation, investigations, inspections, inquiries or proceedings relating in any way to any Environmental Laws or to any permit issued under any such Environmental Laws including, without limitation:

 

(a) any claim by a Governing Authority for enforcement, clean up, removal, response, remedial or other actions or damages pursuant to any Environmental Laws; and

 

(b) any claim by a person seeking damages, contribution, indemnification, cost recovery, compensation or injunctive or other relief resulting from or relating to Hazardous Materials, including any Release thereof, or arising from alleged injury or threat of injury to human health or safety (arising from environmental matters) or the environment.

 

Environmental Laws” means all Applicable Laws relating to the environment or environmental or occupational health and safety matters.

 

Equity Interests” means, means, with respect to any Person, all shares, interests, units, trust units, partnership, membership or other interests, participations or other equivalent rights in the Person’s equity or capital, however designated, whether voting or non voting, whether now outstanding or issued after the Closing Date, together with warrants, options or other rights to acquire any such equity interests of such Person and securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such equity interests of such Person.

 

Event of Default” means any one of the events set forth in Section 11.1.

 

Excluded Taxes” means any of the following Taxes imposed on or with respect to an Agent or any other Finance Party (each, a “Recipient”) or required to be withheld or deducted from a payment to a Recipient: (a) Taxes imposed on or measured by net income (however denominated), franchise Taxes, Canadian federal or provincial capital Taxes and branch profits Taxes, in each case, (i) imposed as a result of such Recipient being organized under the laws of, or having its principal office or, in the case of any Lender, its applicable lending office located in, the jurisdiction imposing such Tax (or any political subdivision thereof) or (ii) that are Other Connection Taxes, (b) U.S. federal withholding Taxes imposed under FATCA, (c) any Canadian withholding Taxes imposed on a payment by or on account of any obligation of the Borrower hereunder by reason of the Recipient (i) not dealing at arm’s length (for purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada)) with the payer of such amount or (ii) being, or not dealing at arm’s length (for purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada)) with, a specified shareholder (as defined in subsection 18(5) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) of the payer of such amount except, in each case, where the non-arm’s length relationship arises, or where the Recipient is a “specified shareholder” or does not deal at arm’s length with a “specified shareholder”, as a result of the Recipient having executed, delivered, become a party to, performed its obligations under, received payments under, received or perfected a security interest under, or engaged in any other transaction pursuant to or enforced any rights under, a Credit Document, and (d) Taxes attributable to such Recipient’s failure to comply with Sections 6.4(f).

 

Exposure” means, with respect to a particular Finance Party at a particular time and without duplication, the aggregate amount of the Secured Obligations owing to such Finance Party at such time determined by such Finance Party.

 

- 8 -

 

FATCA” means Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code, as of the date of this agreement (or any amended or successor version that is substantively comparable and not materially more onerous to comply with), any current or future regulations or official interpretations thereof, any agreement entered into pursuant to Section 1471(b)(1) of the Code, and any applicable intergovernmental agreements and local implementing laws (including, for greater certainty, Part XVIII of the Tax Act), regulations and official guidance with respect to the foregoing.

 

Finance Parties” means, collectively, the Agents and the Lenders.

 

Financial Statements” means, at any time, the audited consolidated financial statements of the Borrower for the most recent Fiscal Year.

 

Fiscal Quarter” means each three-month period of the Borrower ending on the last day of March, June, September and December during each Fiscal Year.

 

Fiscal Year” means the fiscal year of the Borrower which ends on December 31 of each calendar year.

 

[commercially sensitive information redacted]

 

[commercially sensitive information redacted]

 

[commercially sensitive information redacted]

 

GAAP” or “generally accepted accounting principles” means generally accepted accounting principles accepted in Canada from time to time as recommended in the Handbook of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada and its successors and including, where applicable, IFRS.

 

Governing Authority” means any government, parliament, legislature, commission or agency or board of any government, parliament or legislature, or any political subdivision thereof, or any court or (without limitation to the foregoing) any other law-, regulation- or rule-making entity (including, without limitation, any central bank, fiscal or monetary authority or authority regulating banks) having jurisdiction in the relevant circumstances, or any Person acting under the authority of any of the foregoing (including, without limitation, any arbitrator) or any other authority charged with the administration or enforcement of Applicable Laws.

 

Guarantees” means the guarantees entered into by each of the Guarantors in favour of the Collateral Agent, pursuant to which each Guarantor agreed to guarantee the Secured Obligations of the Borrower, as the same may be amended, modified, supplemented or replaced from time to time.

 

Guarantors” means Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema, and each other Restricted Subsidiary that has entered into a Guarantee on or after the date of this agreement, and “Guarantor” means any one of them.

 

Hazardous Materials” means any substance, product, liquid, waste, pollutant, chemical, contaminant, insecticide, pesticide, gaseous or solid matter, organic or inorganic matter, fuel, micro-organism, ray, odour, radiation, energy, vector, plasma, constituent, material or any combination thereof which (a) is listed, regulated or prohibited under any Environmental Law, or (b) is hazardous waste, toxic, a pollutant, a deleterious substance or a contaminant under any Environmental Law, including petroleum or petroleum distillates, asbestos or asbestos containing materials, polychlorinated biphenyls, radon gas and all other substances or wastes of any nature regulated pursuant to any Environmental Law.

 

- 9 -

 

Hedging Agreements” means any arrangement or transaction which is a rate swap transaction, basis swap, forward rate transaction, commodity swap, interest rate option, spot or forward foreign exchange transaction, cap transaction, floor transaction, collar transaction, currency swap transaction, cross-currency rate swap transaction, currency option, equity hedging or any other similar transaction (including any option with respect to any of such transactions or arrangements) designed to protect or mitigate against risks in interest, currency exchange, metals or commodity price fluctuations.

 

Hedge Exposure” of a Person means all obligations of such Person arising under or in connection with Hedging Agreements; provided that:

 

(a) when calculating the value of a Hedging Agreement only the mark-to-market value (or, if any actual amount is due as a result of the termination or close-out of such Hedging Agreement, that amount) shall be taken into account; and

 

(b) where any such Hedging Agreement allows for cross-transaction netting, the Hedge Exposure with respect to any counterparty shall be calculated on an aggregate net basis after taking into account all amounts owing by such counterparty to such Person under Hedging Agreements.

 

IFRS” means International Financial Reporting Standards adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board from time to time.

 

Indemnified Parties” has the meaning set out in Section 6.3.

 

Indemnified Taxes” means Taxes, other than Excluded Taxes.

 

Individual Commitment” means, with respect to a particular Lender, the amount set forth in Schedule A for the Tranche One Loan, Tranche Two Loan and Tranche Three Loan, as applicable, as the individual commitment of such Lender to provide such Loan; as reduced or amended from time to time pursuant to Sections 2.3, 6.2 and 13.5.

 

“Insolvent Person” has the meaning set out in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada), as of the date of this agreement.

 

Intellectual Property” means the intellectual property in patents, patent applications, trade-marks, trade-mark applications, trade names, service marks, copyrights, copyright registrations and trade secrets including, without limitation, customer lists and information and business opportunities, industrial designs, proprietary software, technology, recipes and formulae and other similar intellectual property rights.

 

Interest Rate” means a rate per annum equal to 8.80%.

 

- 10 -

 

Investment” means, with respect to any Person, all direct or indirect investments by such Person in other Persons or in Assets in the form of:

 

(a) loans, advances or capital contributions (excluding (i) loans or advances to officers and employees made in the ordinary course of business or in connection with the relocation of such officers and employees and (ii) accounts receivable arising from sales or services rendered in the ordinary course of such Person’s business);

 

(b) acquisition of any Equity Interests of another Person or any bond, debenture or other indebtedness or debt securities of another Person;

 

(c) acquisition, by purchase or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business, Assets or stock or other evidence of beneficial ownership of a Person; and

 

(d) acquisition by purchase or otherwise of any real property and related personal property of a Person.

 

Any binding commitment to make an Investment in any Person or property and assets, as well as any option of another Person to require an Investment in such Person or property and assets, shall constitute an Investment.

 

Loans” means the Tranche One Loan, Tranche Two Loan and Tranche Three Loan, made subject to and in accordance with the terms of this agreement, and “Loan” means any one of them.

 

Majority Lenders” means, at any particular time prior to the repayment in full of all Secured Obligations and the termination of all commitments of the Lenders hereunder but subject to the next sentence, such group of Lenders whose Individual Commitments (expressed in Dollars) aggregate at least 75% of the aggregate amount of the Individual Commitments of all of the Lenders at such time. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence and except for the purposes of Section 12.13 of this Agreement, at all times prior to the advance of the Tranche Two Loan, Majority Lenders means the group of Tranche One Lenders whose Individual Commitments (expressed in Dollars) aggregate at least 75% of the aggregate amount of the Individual Commitments of all of the Tranche One Lenders at such time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the unfunded Individual Commitment of, and the outstanding extensions of credit held or deemed to be held by, any Defaulting Lender shall be excluded for purposes of making a determination of Majority Lenders.

 

Material Adverse Change” means any change of circumstances or event reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect.

 

Material Adverse Effect” means a material adverse effect on:

 

(a) the business, operations, property, assets, liabilities (actual or contingent) or condition (financial or otherwise) of the Obligors taken as a whole;

 

(b) metals prices, commodity prices, the economy or financial markets that disproportionately affect the Obligors;

 

- 11 -

 

(c) the ability of the Obligors to perform their obligations under the Credit Documents or the validity or enforceability of the Credit Documents; or

 

(d) the ability of any Finance Party to enforce its rights under any Credit Documents.

 

Material Agreement” means (i) [commercially sensitive information redacted], (ii) the Material Agreements referred to in Schedule H hereto, and (iii) any agreement to which an Obligor is party, the termination of which could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, including the investor rights agreement between the Borrower and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited dated October 18, 2019.

 

Maturity Date” means December 18, 2024.

 

Minera Peñasquito Indebtedness” mean the indebtedness owing by the Obligors to Minera Peñasquito, S.A. de C.V. in a principal amount which does not exceed MXN $220,000,000.

 

MXN $” means Mexican pesos.

 

Net Cash Proceeds” means, with respect to any Permitted Asset Disposition pursuant to Section 9.2(h), the gross cash proceeds (including payments from time to time in respect of instalment obligations, if any) received in respect of such Permitted Asset Disposition, less the sum of:

 

(a) the amount, if any, of all Taxes paid or estimated to be payable by or in connection with such Permitted Asset Disposition;

 

(b) amounts received in cash required to be reserved for indemnification, adjustment of purchase price or similar obligations pursuant to the agreements governing such Permitted Asset Disposition;

 

(c) amounts required to be applied to, and applied to, the repayment of Debt secured by an Encumbrance expressly permitted hereunder on any asset that is the subject of such Permitted Asset Disposition (other than any Encumbrance created pursuant to a Credit Document); and

 

(d) reasonable fees, commissions, expenses and costs paid by or on behalf of the selling Obligor relating to such Permitted Asset Disposition.

 

Non-Consenting Lender” means a Lender that has not provided its consent to a waiver of, or amendment to, any provision of the Credit Documents where requested to do so by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent if such waiver or amendment requires the consent of all the Lenders and Lenders whose Individual Commitment at the relevant time aggregate at least 75% of the Total Commitment Amount at such time have consented to such waiver or amendment.

 

Obligors” means the Borrower and the Guarantors, and “Obligor” means any one of them.

 

OFAC” means the United States Office of Foreign Assets Control.

 

- 12 -

 

OFAC Listed Person” means a Person whose name appears on the list of “Specially Designated Nationals” and “Blocked Persons” published by OFAC.

 

OFAC Sanctions Program” means sanctions programmes administered from time to time by OFAC.

 

Other Connection Taxes” means, with respect to any Recipient, Taxes imposed as a result of a present or former connection between such Recipient and the jurisdiction imposing such Tax (other than any connection arising from such Recipient having executed, delivered, become a party to, performed its obligations under, received payments under, received or perfected a security interest under, engaged in any other transaction pursuant to or enforced any Credit Document, or sold or assigned an interest in any Credit Document or advance thereunder).

 

Other Taxes” means all present or future stamp or documentary taxes or any other excise or property taxes, charges or similar levies arising from any payment made hereunder or under any other Credit Document or from the execution, delivery or enforcement of, or otherwise with respect to, this agreement or any other Credit Document.

 

Permits” means all material permits, consents, orders, authorizations, licences, concessions, approvals, rights and privileges or the like issued or granted by any Governing Authority required for the construction, development or operation of the Camino Rojo Project or Cerro Quema Project.

 

Permitted Asset Disposition” has the meaning set out in Section 9.2(h).

 

Permitted Debt” means any of the following:

 

(a) unsecured cash management obligations of the Borrower in the ordinary course of business;

 

(b) the Secured Obligations;

 

(c) any Debt secured by a Permitted Encumbrance;

 

(d) the Minera Peñasquito Indebtedness;

 

(e) Permitted Foreign Exchange Hedging Indebtedness;

 

(f) a working capital credit facility in a principal amount [commercially sensitive information redacted], and ranking first only on accounts receivable and inventory of the Obligors, provided that such working capital facility is (i) subordinate in all other respects to the Secured Obligations and the Security, and (ii) is in form and substance satisfactory to the Majority Lenders, acting reasonably, and subject to an intercreditor agreement on terms satisfactory to the Majority Lenders, acting reasonably (the “Working Capital Facility”);

 

(g) any Guarantee by an Obligor of Debt of any other Obligor if such Debt is permitted under this agreement, excluding any Guarantee by the Borrower or Camino Rojo of any Debt of Cerro Quema or any Debt of any other Restricted Subsidiary;

 

- 13 -

 

(h) any (i) indebtedness of an Obligor to any other Obligor that is set out in Schedule P, as such amount may be reduced by payment thereof from time to time, or (ii) indebtedness of an Obligor to any other Obligor; provided that such indebtedness is funded by (x) amounts of Permitted Distributions permitted to be used for such purpose, and from such sources, qualifying as Permitted Distributions in compliance with Section 9.2(g), or (y) the proceeds of additional capital raised by the Borrower (in excess of, and excluding, the proceeds of the Additional Equity);

 

(i) unsecured Debt of an Obligor to any Affiliate thereof (other than any other Obligor) that is subject to a subordination and postponement agreement in favour of the Administrative Agent in form acceptable to the Administrative Agent, acting reasonably;

 

(j) obligations of Camino Rojo consisting of Bonding Obligations,

 

(k) obligations of Cerro Quema consisting of Bonding Obligations; provided that such obligations are (i) set out in Schedule P, as such obligations may be reduced by payment thereof from time to time, or (ii) funded by (x) amounts of Permitted Distributions permitted to be used, and from such sources, qualifying as Permitted Distributions in compliance with Section 9.2(g), or (y) the proceeds of additional capital raised by the Borrower (in excess of, and excluding, the proceeds of the Additional Equity); and

 

(l) any extension, renewal or replacement of any of the foregoing,

 

provided that, the aggregate outstanding amount of Debt referred to in subparagraphs (c) (which, for certainty, shall not include the Secured Obligations) and (i) shall not at any time exceed [commercially sensitive information redacted].

 

Permitted Distribution” means any of the following, provided that no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing at the time thereof:

 

(a) capital contributions and loans by the Borrower to Camino Rojo and other Subsidiaries of the Borrower; provided that such capital contributions and loans made to Subsidiaries other than Camino Rojo are not funded from (i) Additional Capital, or (ii) save and except as permitted by paragraph (b) below, proceeds of the business or operations of any Restricted Subsidiary, or the proceeds of the sale of any shares or Assets of any Restricted Subsidiary;

 

(b) subject to compliance with paragraph (d) below, capital contributions and loans in a minimum amount of $1,000,000 and integral multiples of $100,000 thereafter made after such time as the Additional Equity is raised and using (i) proceeds of the business or operations of any Restricted Subsidiary or (ii) proceeds of the sale of any Assets of any Restricted Subsidiary permitted by Section 9.2(h) of this agreement (and not from Additional Capital), in each case to fund the Cerro Quema Project;

 

- 14 -

 

(c) dividends, loans, repayments or other Distributions by Camino Rojo to the Borrower in a minimum amount of $1,000,000 and integral multiples of $100,000 where all of the proceeds of such dividends, loans, repayments or other Distributions are immediately used to repay the Loans, together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon and all other Secured Obligations owing by the Obligors to and including the date of such Distribution; and

 

(d) dividends, loans, repayments or other Distributions by Camino Rojo to the Borrower or any Restricted Subsidiary in a minimum amount of $1,000,000 and integral multiples of $100,000 thereafter for use by the Borrower or such Restricted Subsidiary for general corporate purposes; provided that, 50% of the proceeds of such dividend, loan, repayment or other Distribution are used by the Borrower or such Restricted Subsidiary for general corporate purposes (which general corporate purpose (i) shall include funding the Cerro Quema Project (including, without limitation, the construction, development and operation thereof), provided that the same is not funded with Additional Capital and (ii)  shall not include (x) dividends, loans, share buy-backs, repayments and other Distributions, or (y) the construction, development or operation of, or investment in, or funding of debt service related to, any mine, property or business that is not subject to the Security) and the remaining 50% of such proceeds are immediately distributed to the Borrower to be used to repay the Loans, together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon and all other Secured Obligations owing by the Obligors to and including the date of such Distribution.

 

Absent a Default or an Event of Default, and except for the requirement to repay the Loans under (c) above, in no circumstances will the Obligors be required to use more than 50% of the proceeds of any Distributions or Investments to repay the Loans, accrued and unpaid interest thereon and other Secured Obligations.

 

Permitted Encumbrances” means, as of any particular time, any of the following with respect to the property and assets of any Obligor:

 

(a) the rights reserved to or vested in any municipality or governmental or other public authority by any statutory provision or by the terms of leases, licenses, franchises, grants or permits, which do not materially interfere with the use of or materially detract from the value of the assets subject thereto;

 

(b) servitudes, easements, rights-of-way, restrictions and other similar encumbrances imposed by Applicable Law or incurred in the ordinary course of business and encumbrances consisting of zoning or building restrictions, easements, licenses, restrictions on the use of property or minor imperfections in title thereto which, in the aggregate, are not material, and which do not in any case materially detract from the value of the property subject thereto or interfere with the ordinary conduct of the business of any Obligor;

 

(c) Encumbrances imposed by law for Taxes, assessments or governmental charges or levies not yet due or which are being contested in good faith and by appropriate proceedings diligently conducted if adequate reserves with respect thereto are maintained in accordance with GAAP on the books of the applicable Obligor;

 

- 15 -

 

(d) carrier’s, warehousemen’s, mechanics’, materialmen’s, repairmen’s, construction and other like Encumbrances arising by operation of Applicable Law, arising in the ordinary course of business and securing amounts (i) which are not overdue for a period of more than 30 days, or (ii) which are being contested in good faith and by appropriate proceedings and, during such period during which amounts are being so contested, such Encumbrances shall not be executed on or enforced against any Secured Assets, provided that the applicable Obligor shall have set aside on its books adequate reserves therefor and not resulting in qualification by auditors;

 

(e) undetermined or inchoate Encumbrances and charges arising or potentially arising under statutory provisions which have not at the time been filed or registered in accordance with Applicable Law or of which written notice has not been given in accordance with Applicable Law or which although filed or registered, relate to obligations not due or delinquent, including without limitation statutory Encumbrances incurred, or pledges or deposits made, under worker’s compensation, employment insurance, pension and employment and other social security legislation;

 

(f) deposits or Encumbrances over cash collateral and securing Bonding Obligations which qualify as Permitted Debt, together with any Encumbrance over the contract for which the underlying instrument was issued as security;

 

(g) Encumbrances or covenants restricting or prohibiting access to or from lands abutting on controlled access highways or covenants affecting the use to which lands may be put; provided that such Encumbrances or covenants do not materially and adversely affect the use of the lands by any Obligor;

 

(h) customary securities granted to public utilities or to any municipalities or Governing Authorities or other public authority when required by the utility, municipality or Governing Authorities or other public authority in connection with the supply of services or utilities to the Obligors;

 

(i) unsecured adverse claims resulting from any judgment or award which does not constitute an Event of Default, the time for the appeal or petition for rehearing of which shall not have expired, or in respect of which the applicable Obligor shall be prosecuting an appeal or proceeding for review in good faith and by appropriate proceedings and in respect of which a stay of execution pending such appeal or proceeding for review shall have been granted and remains in effect;

 

(j) customary statutory Encumbrances incurred or pledges or deposits made in favour of a Governmental Authority to secure the performance of obligations of any Obligor under Environmental Laws to which any assets of such Obligor are subject;

 

(k) any and all other statutory liens, charges, adverse claims, prior claims, security interests or encumbrances of any nature whatsoever which are not registered on the title to the property and of which such Obligor does not have notice, claimed or held by any Governing Authority under or pursuant to any Applicable Law, which do not materially interfere with the use of or materially detract from the value of the assets subject thereto;

 

- 16 -

 

(l) Encumbrances consisting of royalties payable with respect to any Assets of the Obligors existing as of the Closing Date described in Schedule M or otherwise permitted by Section 9.2(c).

 

(m) customary rights of set-off or combination of accounts with respect to deposits and/or accounts permitted to be maintained under the terms of this agreement;

 

(n) the interest of a vendor or a lessor under any conditional sale agreement, title retention agreement or consignment agreement (or any financing lease having substantially the same economic effect as any of the foregoing) permitted under the terms of this agreement;

 

(o) Encumbrances on concentrates, minerals or the proceeds of sale of such concentrates or minerals arising or granted pursuant to a processing arrangement entered into in the ordinary course and upon usual market terms, securing the payment of the Borrower’s or any of its Subsidiaries’ portion of the fees, costs and expenses attributable to the processing of such concentrates or minerals under any such processing arrangement, but only insofar as such Encumbrances relate to obligations which are at such time not past due or the validity of which are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and as to which reserves are being maintained in accordance with GAAP;

 

(p) Encumbrances granted pursuant to the Security Documents;

 

(q) Encumbrances on equipment in favour of a Person providing financing for such equipment or securing Capitalized Lease Obligations (and proceeds thereof, including any insurance proceeds related thereto); provided that, such Encumbrance is expressly and strictly limited to the equipment being financed by such Person and its proceeds and the aggregate amount of Debt secured by all such financings [commercially sensitive information redacted];

 

(r) Encumbrances in respect of the Working Capital Facility ranking first only on accounts receivable and inventory but subordinate to the Lenders in all other respects, which are subject to an intercreditor agreement on terms satisfactory to the Majority Lenders, acting reasonably;

 

(s) Encumbrances in respect of Permitted Foreign Exchange Hedging Indebtedness which are subject to an intercreditor agreement on terms satisfactory to the Majority Lenders, acting reasonably; and

 

(t) any extension, renewal or replacement of any of the foregoing.

 

Permitted Foreign Exchange Hedging Indebtedness” means foreign exchange related hedging indebtedness of up to 100% of the peso denominated capital expenditures during the Camino Rojo construction period, and which is subject to an intercreditor agreement on terms satisfactory to the Majority Lenders, acting reasonably. Following completion of the Camino Rojo construction period, Permitted Foreign Exchange Hedging Indebtedness shall be limited to contract term not to exceed 12-month and an amount not to exceed up to 25% of the peso-denominated operating costs at the Camino Rojo Project.

 

- 17 -

 

Permitted Investment” means any of the following Investments:

 

(a) [commercially sensitive information redacted];

 

(b) Investments made by an Obligor using proceeds of a Permitted Distribution that are not required to be used to prepay the Loans, accrued and unpaid interest thereon and other Secured Obligations;

 

(c) Investments made by the Borrower in Camino Rojo using proceeds of the Additional Capital; and

 

(d) Investments existing as at the Closing Date described in Schedule N.

 

Person” means any individual, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, limited or unlimited liability company, joint venture, syndicate, sole proprietorship, company or corporation with or without share capital, unincorporated association, unincorporated syndicate, unincorporated organization, foundation, business entity, trust, trustee, executor, administrator or other legal personal representative or Governing Authority.

 

PPSA” means the Personal Property Security Act (Ontario), as amended.

 

Proceeds of Realization” means all cash and non-cash proceeds derived from any sale, disposition or other realization of the Secured Assets (i) on or after the Enforcement Date, (ii) upon any dissolution, liquidation, winding-up, reorganization, bankruptcy, insolvency or receivership of any Obligor (or any other arrangement or marshalling of the Secured Assets that is similar thereto) or (iii) upon the enforcement of, or any action taken with respect to, any Security Document.

 

Pro Rata Share” means at any particular time with respect to a particular Lender, the ratio of the Individual Commitments of such Lender at such time to the Total Commitment Amount of all of the Lenders at such time.

 

Receiver” means a receiver, receiver and manager or the person having similar powers or authority appointed by the Collateral Agent at the direction of the Majority Lenders, or by a court at the instance of the Collateral Agent, in each case respect of the Secured Assets or any part thereof.

 

Recipient” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the definition of “Excluded Taxes”.

 

Release” means any release, spill, emission, leak, pumping, injection, deposit, disposal, discharge, dispersal, leaching or migration into the environment including, without limitation, the movement of Hazardous Materials through ambient air, soil, surface water, ground water, wetlands, land or sub surface strata.

  

- 18 -

 

Relevant Jurisdiction” means, from time to time, with respect to a Person that is granting Security hereunder, any province or territory of Canada or any other country, political subdivision thereof, in which such Person has its jurisdiction of formation, chief executive office or chief place of business or has tangible real and personal Assets (other than Assets in transit) and, for greater certainty, at the Closing Date includes the locations set forth in Schedule F.

 

Responsible Officer” means, with respect to any Person, the chief executive officer, president, or chief financial officer of such Person (and, in the case of the execution and delivery of the Transaction Documents, any other Person properly authorized by resolutions of the board of directors (or equivalent) of such Person, or a valid power of attorney under Applicable Law) and, with respect to an Agent, includes any senior officer of such Agent with responsibility for the administration of the duties of such Agent under this Agreement and the other Credit Documents. Any document delivered hereunder that is signed by a Responsible Officer of an Obligor shall be conclusively presumed to have been authorized by all necessary corporate and/or other action on the part of such Obligor and such Responsible Officer shall be conclusively presumed to have acted on behalf of such Obligor.

 

Restricted Subsidiary” means each direct or indirect Subsidiary of the Borrower with a direct or indirect interest in: (i) the Camino Rojo Project or (ii) the Cerro Quema Project.

 

[commercially sensitive information redacted]

 

Sanctioned Entity” means (a) a country or a government of a country, (b) an agency of the government of a country, (c) an organization directly or indirectly controlled by a country or its government, (d) a Person resident in or determined to be resident in a country, in each case, that is subject to a country sanctions program administered and enforced by OFAC or similar program administered under Canadian Sanctions Law.

 

Secured Assets” means all of the present and future (a) Assets constituting personal property of the Obligors, (b) Assets constituting real property of the Obligors related to the Camino Rojo Project and (c) any and all proceeds of any of the foregoing.

 

Secured Obligations” means all indebtedness, obligations and liabilities, present or future, absolute or contingent, matured or not, at any time owing by any Obligor to the Finance Parties or any of them or remaining unpaid to the Finance Parties or any of them under or in connection with the Credit Documents. For certainty, “Secured Obligations” shall include interest accruing subsequent to the filing of, or which would have accrued but for the filing of, a petition for bankruptcy, in accordance with and at the rate (including any rate applicable pursuant to this agreement upon the occurrence of any Event of Default that is continuing to the extent lawful) specified herein, whether or not such interest is an allowable claim in such bankruptcy proceeding.

 

Secured Obligations Termination Date” means the date on which all Secured Obligations (other than those provisions which by their terms survive the termination of the Credit Documents) have been indefeasibly paid in full and the Finance Parties have no Individual Commitments.

 

Security” means the Encumbrances created by the Security Documents.

  

- 19 -

 

Security Documents” means the security documents (as the same may be amended, modified, supplemented, restated or replaced from time to time) which, in the reasonable opinion of the Collateral Agent, are required to be entered into from time to time by the Obligors in favour of the Collateral Agent on behalf of the Finance Parties in order to grant to the Collateral Agent an Encumbrance on the Secured Assets as continuing collateral security for the payment and performance of the Secured Obligations of the Obligors, such security documents to be in form and substance satisfactory to the Collateral Agent and to include the security documents described in Schedule G.

 

share” means, at any particular time with respect to a particular Lender and a particular Loan, the ratio of the Individual Commitment of such Lender with respect to such Loan at such time to the aggregate of the Individual Commitments of all Lenders with respect to such Loan at such time.

 

Subsidiary” means, as to any Person, any other Person in which such first Person or one or more of its Subsidiaries or such first Person and one or more of its Subsidiaries owns sufficient voting interests to enable it or them (as a group) ordinarily, in the absence of contingencies, to elect a majority of the directors (or Persons performing similar functions) of such second Person, and any partnership or joint venture if more than a 50% interest in the profits or capital thereof is owned by such first Person or one or more of its Subsidiaries or such first Person and one or more of its Subsidiaries (unless such partnership or joint venture can and does ordinarily take major business actions without the prior approval of such Person or one or more of its Subsidiaries). Unless the context otherwise clearly requires, any reference to a “Subsidiary” is a reference to a Subsidiary of the Borrower.

 

Tax Act” means the Income Tax Act (Canada), as the same may be amended, supplemented or replaced.

 

Taxes” means all taxes, charges, fees, levies, imposts, rates, dues, premiums and assessments, including all income, sales, use, goods and services, harmonized sales, value added, capital, capital gains, alternative, net worth, transfer, profits, branch, gross receipts, windfall profits, withholding, payroll, employer health, excise, environmental, real property and personal property taxes, and any other taxes, customs duties, fees, assessments, or similar charges in the nature of a tax including federal, state and provincial pension plan contributions, employment/unemployment insurance payments, employer health and workers’ compensation premiums, together with any instalments with respect thereto, and any interest, fines and penalties with respect thereto, imposed, levied, collected, withheld or assessed by any Governing Authority (including federal, state, local, territorial, provincial, municipal, supranational and foreign Governing Authority), and whether disputed or not.

 

Total Commitment Amount” means, at any particular time, the aggregate of the Individual Commitments of all of the Lenders at such time.

 

Tranche One Lenders” means the Lenders set forth in Schedule A as Lenders under the heading “Tranche One Loan”, and “Tranche One Lender” means any of them.

 

Tranche One Loan” shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 2.1(a).

 

- 20 -

 

Tranche Two Loan” shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 2.1(b).

 

Tranche Three Loan” shall have the meaning ascribed in Section 2.1(c).

 

Transaction Documents” means the Credit Documents and the Warrants and “Transaction Document” means any of the Transaction Documents.

 

U.S.” and “United States” means the United States of America, its territories and possessions, and any State of the United States and the District of Columbia.

 

U.S. Person” means a (a) U.S. Person as that term is defined in Rule 902 of Regulation S (“Regulation S”) promulgated under the U.S. Securities Act, (b) any person purchasing securities on behalf or the account or benefit of any “U.S. Person” or any person in the United States, (c) any person that receives or received an offer of the securities while in the United States, (d) any person that is in the United States at the time the purchaser’s buy order was made or this subscription was executed or delivered. “U.S. person” includes but is not limited to (i) any natural person resident in the United States; (ii) any partnership or corporation organized or incorporated under the laws of the United States; (iii) any partnership or corporation organized outside the United States by a U.S. person principally for the purpose of investing in securities not registered under the U.S. Securities Act, unless it is organized or incorporated, and owned, by accredited investors who are not natural persons, estates or trusts; (iv) any estate or trust of which any executor or administrator or trustee is a U.S. person.

 

U.S. Securities Act” means the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and all rules, regulations and orders promulgated thereunder, as amended from time to time.

 

Warrants” means, collectively, the 32,500,000 common share purchase warrants in the capital of the Borrower, with an exercise price of Cdn$3.00 per common share and a seven (7) year exercise period from the date of issue, to be issued to each of the Lenders on or before the Closing Date in consideration, inter alia, for such Lender’s commitment to fund the Loans in accordance with the terms of this agreement.

 

Working Capital Facility” has the meaning set out in subparagraph (f) of the definition of “Permitted Debt”.

 

1.2 Other Usages

 

References to “this agreement”, “the agreement”, “hereof”, “herein”, “hereto” and like references refer to this Loan Agreement and not to any particular Article, Section or other subdivision of this agreement. References to an “Article”, “Section” or “Schedule” followed by a number or letter refer to the specified Article or Section of or Schedule to this agreement. Except as otherwise specifically provided, references in this agreement or any other Credit Document to any contract, agreement, license, franchise or any other instrument (including the Credit Documents) shall be deemed to include references to the same as varied, supplemented, waived, amended, restated or replaced from time to time in accordance with the terms hereof and thereof. References to “include” and “including” shall be read and construed as being followed by the phrase “without limitation”.

 

- 21 -

 

1.3 Plural and Singular

 

Where the context so requires, words importing the singular number shall include the plural and vice versa.

 

1.4 Headings

 

The division of this agreement into Articles and Sections and the insertion of headings in this agreement are for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of this agreement.

 

1.5 Currency

 

Unless otherwise specified herein, all statements of or references to dollar amounts in this agreement shall mean lawful money of the United States.

 

1.6 Applicable Law

 

This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein. Any legal action or proceeding with respect to this agreement may be brought in the courts of the Province of Ontario and, by execution and delivery of this agreement, the parties hereby accept for themselves and in respect of their property, generally and unconditionally, the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the aforesaid courts. Nothing herein shall limit the right of any party to serve process in any manner permitted by law or to commence legal proceedings or otherwise proceed against any other party in any other jurisdiction.

 

1.7 Time of the Essence

 

Time shall in all respects be of the essence of this agreement.

 

1.8 Non Banking Days

 

Whenever any payment to be made hereunder shall be stated to be due or any action to be taken hereunder shall be stated to be required to be taken on a day other than a Banking Day, such payment shall be made or such action shall be taken on the next succeeding Banking Day and, in the case of the payment of any amount, the extension of time shall be included for the purposes of computation of interest, if any, thereon.

 

1.9 Consents and Approvals

 

Whenever the consent or approval of a party hereto is required in a particular circumstance, unless otherwise expressly provided for therein, such consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed by such party.

 

1.10 Schedules

 

Each and every one of the schedules which is referred to in this agreement and attached to this agreement shall form a part of this agreement.

 

- 22 -

 

1.11 Rule of Construction

  

The Credit Documents have been negotiated by each party with the benefit of legal representation, and any rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply to the construction or interpretation of the Credit Documents.

 

1.12 Accounting Terms – GAAP

 

All accounting terms not otherwise defined in this agreement shall have those meanings assigned to them by, and all calculations are to be made and all financial data to be submitted are to be prepared in accordance with, GAAP, except as otherwise expressly provided.

 

To the extent that the definitions of accounting terms in this agreement or in any certificate or other document made or delivered pursuant to this agreement are inconsistent with the meanings of such terms under GAAP, the definitions in this agreement or in any such certificate or other document shall prevail.

 

1.13 Permitted Encumbrances

 

For the avoidance of doubt, any reference to a Permitted Encumbrance in any Credit Document shall not subordinate or postpone, and shall not be interpreted as subordinating or postponing, any Encumbrance created by any Security Document to such Permitted Encumbrance.

 

Article 2
CREDIT FACILITY

 

2.1 Establishment of Credit Facility

 

Subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement, the Lenders hereby establish in favour of the Borrower a non-revolving term credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) in the amount of $125,000,000 (as such amount may be reduced pursuant to Section 2.3). The Credit Facility shall be advanced to the Borrower in three tranches as follows, subject to and in accordance with the terms of this agreement:

 

(a) the first tranche in the amount of $25,000,000 (the “Tranche One Loan”) shall be advanced to the Borrower upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Sections 10.1 and 10.2;

 

(b) the second tranche in the amount of $50,000,000 (the “Tranche Two Loan”) shall be advanced to the Borrower upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Section 10.3; and

 

(c) the third tranche in the amount of $50,000,000 (the “Tranche Three Loan”) shall be advanced to the Borrower upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Section 10.3.

 

- 23 -

 

2.2 Lenders’ Commitments

 

Subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement, each Lender severally agrees to advance its share of the Loans to the Borrower based on their respective Individual Commitments provided that the aggregate amount of Loans advanced by each Lender shall not at any time exceed the aggregate Individual Commitments of such Lender. The Tranche One Loan shall be made available to the Borrower contemporaneously by all of the Tranche One Lenders. The Tranche Two Loan and Tranche Three Loan shall be made available to the Borrower contemporaneously by all of the Lenders. No Lender shall be responsible for any default by any other Lender in its obligation to provide its required share of any Loan nor shall the Individual Commitment of any Lender be increased as a result of any such default of another Lender in advancing its required share of such Loan. The failure of any Lender to make available to the Borrower its required share of any Loan shall not relieve any other Lender of its obligation hereunder to make available to the Borrower its required share of such Loans.

 

2.3 Permanent Reduction of Credit Facility

 

The amount of the Credit Facility will be permanently reduced with respect to each repayment or prepayment made in accordance with Sections 7.1 and 7.2, such reduction to be in an amount equal to the amount of the repayment or prepayment and to be at the time of the repayment or prepayment. Upon any repayment or prepayment, Schedule A shall be deemed to be amended to reduce the aggregate amount of the Individual Commitments by the amount of such repayment or prepayment, with the Individual Commitment of each Lender reduced on a pro rata basis.

 

2.4 Termination of Credit Facility

 

The Credit Facility shall terminate upon the earliest to occur of:

 

(a) the termination of the Credit Facility in accordance with Section 11.1;

 

(b) the date, if any, on which the Secured Obligations have been indefeasibly repaid in full pursuant to Sections 7.1(b), 7.1(c) or 7.2; and

 

(c) the Maturity Date.

 

Upon the termination of the Credit Facility, the right of the Borrower to obtain any Loan under the Credit Facility and all of the obligations of the Lenders to advance any Loan under the Credit Facility shall automatically terminate.

 

Article 3
GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO CREDITS

 

3.1 Funding of Loans

 

Each Tranche One Lender agrees, severally and not jointly and severally, to make available to the Administrative Agent its share of the Tranche One Loan prior to 12:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on the date which is at least one Banking Day prior to the date for the extension of such loan. For the Tranche Two Loan and Tranche Three Loan, each Lender agrees, severally and not jointly and severally, to make available to the Administrative Agent its Individual Commitment of the principal amount of the Tranche Two Loan and Tranche Three Loan, as applicable, prior to 12:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on the date which is at least five (5) Banking Days prior to the date for the extension of the applicable Loan. The Administrative Agent shall, upon fulfilment by the Borrower of the applicable terms and conditions set forth in Article 10 and as irrevocably authorized and directed in the Drawdown Notice, make the applicable Loan available to the Borrower on the date of the extension of such Loan by crediting the Borrower Account (or causing such account to be credited) provided that the Administrative Agent has received from each applicable Lender, its respective share of the applicable advance.

 

- 24 -

  

3.2 Defaulting Lender

 

If any Defaulting Lender fails to make available to the Administrative Agent any portion of its share of any Loan, the Administrative Agent shall forthwith give notice of such failure by the Defaulting Lender to the Borrower and the other Lenders and such notice shall state that any Lender may make available to the Administrative Agent all or any portion of the Defaulting Lender’s share of such Loan, as applicable (but in no way shall any other Lender or the Administrative Agent be obliged to do so), in the place and stead of the Defaulting Lender. If more than one Lender gives notice that it is prepared to make funds available in the place and stead of a Defaulting Lender in such circumstances and the aggregate of the funds which such Lenders (herein collectively called the “Contributing Lenders” and individually called the “Contributing Lender”) are prepared to make available exceeds the amount of the advance which the Defaulting Lender failed to make, then each Contributing Lender shall be deemed to have given notice that it is prepared to make available its Pro Rata Share of such advance based on the Contributing Lenders’ relative commitments to advance in such circumstance. If any Contributing Lender makes funds available in the place and stead of a Defaulting Lender in such circumstances, then the Defaulting Lender shall (i) pay to such Contributing Lender, forthwith on demand, (x) any amount advanced to the Borrower on the Defaulting Lender’s behalf together with interest thereon at the same rate payable by the Borrower on the funds advanced for each day from the date of advance to the date of payment, against payment by such Contributing Lender making the funds available of all interest received in respect of the Loan from the Borrower, and (y) such Defaulting Lender’s Pro Rata Share of the Commitment Fee previously received by it in an amount equal to the amount of the Defaulting Lender’s failed commitment for such Loan divided by the Total Commitment Amount (the “Defaulting Percentage”), and (ii) transfer to the Contributing Lender, in consideration for payment to the Defaulting Lender of ten dollars ($10) and no other fee or compensation (and at such Defaulting Lender’s sole cost and expense), its Defaulting Percentage of all Warrants previously issued to such Defaulting Lender. In furtherance of the foregoing, each Lender acknowledges and agrees that, until such time as such Lender has funded its respective commitment for the Tranche Two Loan or Tranche Three Loan, as the case may be, such Lender shall not be entitled to sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of (a “Disposition”) that portion of the Warrants issued to it corresponding to the portion of the Loans not yet funded by such Lender at such time divided by the Total Commitment Amount at such time, and that any such Disposition of such Warrants shall be restricted accordingly. In addition to interest as aforesaid, the Borrower shall pay all amounts which would otherwise have been owing and payable by the Borrower to the Defaulting Lender hereunder (with respect to the amounts advanced by the Contributing Lenders to the Borrower on behalf of the Defaulting Lender) to the Contributing Lenders until such time as the Defaulting Lender pays to the Administrative Agent for the Contributing Lenders all amounts advanced by the Contributing Lenders on behalf of the Defaulting Lender.

 

- 25 -

  

3.3 Time and Place of Payments

 

Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, the Borrower shall make all payments pursuant to this agreement or pursuant to any document, instrument or agreement delivered pursuant hereto by deposit to the Agent Account before 12:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on the day specified for payment and the Administrative Agent shall be entitled to withdraw the amount of any payment due to the Administrative Agent or the Lenders hereunder from such account on the day specified for payment.

 

3.4 Remittance of Payments

 

Forthwith after receipt in the Agent Account by the Administrative Agent of any payment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts for the benefit of the Lenders pursuant to Section 3.3, the Administrative Agent shall, subject to Section 6.2, remit to each Lender, in immediately available funds, such Lender’s Pro Rata Share of such payment (except to the extent such payment results from a Loan with respect to which a Defaulting Lender had failed, pursuant to Section 3.2, to make available to the Administrative Agent any portion of its required share of such Loan and where any other Lender has made funds available in the place and stead of such Defaulting Lender).

 

3.5 Evidence of Indebtedness

 

The Administrative Agent shall maintain accounts wherein the Administrative Agent shall record the amount of credit outstanding, each payment of principal and interest on account of each Loan. The Administrative Agent’s accounts constitute, in the absence of demonstrable error, prima facie evidence of the indebtedness of the Borrower pursuant to this agreement.

 

3.6 Notice Periods

 

Each Drawdown Notice shall be given to the Administrative Agent prior to 3:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on a date not later than the tenth (10th) Banking Day prior to the date of any drawdown (except for the Drawdown Notice for the Tranche One Loan, which may be given one (1) Banking Day prior to the date of that drawdown). Any Prepayment Notice shall be given to the Administrative Agent prior to 3:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on a date no later than the fifth (5th) Banking Day prior to the date of any voluntary prepayment.

 

Article 4
DRAWDOWNS

 

4.1 Drawdown Notice

 

Subject to the provisions of this agreement and provided that all of the applicable conditions precedent set forth in Article 10 have been fulfilled by the Borrower or waived by the Lenders as provided in Section 12.13, the Borrower may, from time to time, obtain any Loan hereunder by giving to the Administrative Agent an irrevocable notice in substantially the form of Schedule D (a “Drawdown Notice”) in accordance with Section 3.6 and specifying:

 

- 26 -

 

(a) the date of the advance of the Loan; and

 

(b) the principal amount of the Loan to be advanced.

 

Article 5
INTEREST AND FEES

 

5.1 Interest Rates

 

The Borrower shall pay to the Lenders, in accordance with Section 3.3, interest on the outstanding principal amount from time to time of each Loan at the Interest Rate.

 

5.2 Calculation and Payment of Interest

 

(a) Interest on the outstanding principal amount from time to time of each Loan shall accrue from day to day from and including the date on which such Loan is advanced to but excluding the date on which such Loan is repaid in full (both before and after maturity and as well after as before judgment) and shall be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months.

 

(b) Accrued interest shall be paid quarterly in arrears on the last Banking Day of December, March, June and September in each year (beginning with March 30, 2020), and on the Maturity Date.

 

(c) Prior to the date that the Borrower has raised the Additional Equity, payment of accrued interest shall be paid by the Borrower from its own resources; provided however, the Borrower shall be entitled to use proceeds of the Loan strictly for the purposes of paying accrued interest required to be paid by the Borrower on the last Banking Day of March, 2020 and June, 2020. After the date that the Borrower has raised the Additional Equity, and strictly conditional upon the Borrower raising the Additional Equity, the Borrower shall be entitled to use proceeds of the Loan for the purposes of paying accrued interest on the Loans.

 

5.3 General Interest Rules

 

(a) For the purposes of this agreement, whenever interest is calculated on the basis of a year other than 365 or 366 days, each rate of interest determined pursuant to such calculation expressed as an annual rate for the purposes of the Interest Act (Canada) is equivalent to such rate as so determined multiplied by the actual number of days in the calendar year in which the same is to be ascertained and divided by 365 or 366 days, respectively.

 

(b) Interest on each Loan and on overdue interest thereon shall be payable in the currency in which such Loan is denominated during the relevant period.

 

(c) If the Borrower fails to pay any fee or other amount of any nature payable by it to the Administrative Agent or the Lenders hereunder or under any Credit Document or other document, instrument or agreement delivered pursuant hereto as and when due in accordance with the terms of this agreement, the Borrower shall (without duplication to payments required under Section 10.4 or 11.4) pay to the Administrative Agent or the Lenders, as the case may be, interest on such overdue amount in the same currency as such overdue amount is payable from and including such due date to but excluding the date of actual payment (as well after as before judgment), at the rate per annum, calculated and, to the extent unpaid, compounded monthly, which is equal to the Interest Rate plus an additional 2% per annum. Such interest on overdue amounts shall become due and be paid on the earlier of (i) the date that demand is made by the Administrative Agent and (ii) the last day of each month.

 

- 27 -

  

(d) If any provision of this agreement would oblige the Borrower to make any payment of interest or other amount payable to any Lender in an amount or calculated at a rate which would be prohibited by Applicable Law or would result in a receipt by that Lender of “interest” at a “criminal rate” (as such terms are construed under the Criminal Code (Canada)), then, notwithstanding such provision, such amount or rate shall be deemed to have been adjusted with retroactive effect to the maximum amount or rate of interest, as the case may be, as would not be so prohibited by Applicable Law or so result in a receipt by that Lender of “interest” at a “criminal rate”, such adjustment to be effected, to the extent necessary (but only to the extent necessary), as follows:
     
    (i) first, by reducing the amount or rate of interest required to be paid to the affected Lender under this Article 5; and
       
    (ii) thereafter, by reducing any fees, commissions, costs, expenses, premiums and other amounts required to be paid to the affected Lender which would constitute interest for purposes of section 347 of the Criminal Code (Canada).

  

5.4 Commitment Fee

 

The Borrower shall pay the Lenders an upfront fee in an aggregate amount equal to 1.00% of the Loans (the “Commitment Fee”) on the Closing Date, which Commitment Fee shall be earned and payable to each of the Lenders on the Closing Date on a pro rata basis in their respective Pro Rata Shares. In satisfaction of the payment of the Commitment Fee by the Borrower, each Lender may deduct its pro rata share of such Commitment Fee from the portion of the Tranche One Loan to be advanced by such Lender to the Borrower.

 

Article 6
replacement of Lenders, Indemnity and Tax Provisions

 

6.1 Conditions of Credit

 

The obtaining or maintaining of Loans hereunder shall be subject to the terms and conditions contained in this Article 6.

 

- 28 -

 

6.2 Replacement of Lenders

  

(a) If any Lender is a Defaulting Lender, or if any Lender is a Non-Consenting Lender, or if the Borrower is required to pay any additional amount to any Lender or any Governing Authority for the account of any Lender pursuant to Section 6.4, then the Borrower may, at its sole expense and effort, upon notice to such Lender and the Administrative Agent, require such Lender to assign and delegate, without recourse (in accordance with and subject to the restrictions contained in Section 13.5), all its interests, rights and obligations under this agreement to an assignee that shall assume such obligations (which assignee may be another Lender, if a Lender accepts such assignment); provided that (a) if such assignee is not otherwise a Lender, Affiliate of any Lender or any fund managed by a Lender, the Borrower shall have received the prior written consent of the Administrative Agent (acting at the written direction of the Majority Lenders), which consent shall not unreasonably be withheld, (b) such Lender shall have received payment of an amount equal to the outstanding principal of its Loans, accrued interest thereon, accrued fees and all other amounts payable to it hereunder from the assignee (to the extent of such outstanding principal and accrued interest and fees) or the Borrower (in the case of all other amounts) and (c) in the case of any such assignment resulting from payments required to be made pursuant to Section 6.4, such assignment will result in a reduction in such compensation or payments. Upon any such assignment, Schedule A shall be deemed to be amended as required to reflect such assignment.

 

(b) If the Borrower is required to pay any additional amount to any Lender or any Governing Authority for the account of any Lender pursuant to Section 6.4, then such Lender shall, following a request from the Borrower use reasonable efforts to designate a different lending office for funding or booking its Loans hereunder or to assign its rights and obligations hereunder to another of its offices, branches or an Affiliate of such Lender, if, in the judgment of such Lender, acting reasonably, such designation or assignment (a) would eliminate or reduce amounts payable pursuant to Section 6.4 in the future, and (b) would not subject such Lender to any unreimbursed cost or expense and would not otherwise be disadvantageous to such Lender. The Borrower shall pay all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by any Lender in connection with any such designation or assignment.

 

6.3 Indemnity for Transactional Liability

 

(a) The Borrower hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the Agents, each other Finance Party and its Affiliates and each of its and their respective shareholders, officers, directors, employees and agents (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”) free and harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, costs, charges, liabilities and damages, and expenses in connection therewith (irrespective of whether such Indemnified Party is a party to the action for which indemnification hereunder is sought), and including, without limitation, reasonable and documented legal fees and out of pocket disbursements and amounts paid in settlement thereof (which settlement, other than any settlement made to avoid criminal sanction to any Finance Party, is approved by the Borrower) (collectively in this Section 6.3(a), the “Indemnified Liabilities”), incurred or suffered by, the Indemnified Parties or any of them as a result of, or arising out of, or relating to (i) the making of the Loans contemplated herein, (ii) any actual or threatened investigation, litigation or other proceeding relating to any Loan extended or proposed to be extended as contemplated herein or (iii) the execution, delivery, performance or enforcement of the Credit Documents and any instrument, document or agreement executed pursuant hereto or thereto, except for any such Indemnified Liabilities claimed by an Indemnified Party that a court of competent jurisdiction determines, by way of final and unappealable judgement, arose on account of such Indemnified Party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct.

 

- 29 -

 

(b) All obligations provided for in this Section 6.3 shall survive indefinitely the permanent repayment of the outstanding credit hereunder and the termination of this agreement. The obligations provided for in this Section 6.3 shall not be reduced or impaired by any investigation made by or on behalf of an Agent or any other Finance Party.

 

(c) The Borrower hereby agrees that, for the purposes of effectively allocating the risk of loss placed on the Borrower by this Section 6.3, each Agent and each other Finance Party shall be deemed to be acting as the agent or trustee on behalf of and for the benefit of their respective Affiliates and each of its and their shareholders, officers, directors, employees and agents.

 

(d) If, for any reason, the obligations of the Borrower pursuant to this Section 6.3, shall be unenforceable, the Borrower agrees to make the maximum contribution to the payment and satisfaction of each obligation that is permissible under Applicable Law.

 

(e) The indemnity under this Section 6.3 shall not apply to any matters specifically dealt with in Sections 6.4, 6.5 or 9.1(f).

 

6.4 Gross-Up for Taxes

 

(a) Any and all payments or credits made by or on behalf of the Obligors under this agreement or under any other Credit Document (any such payment being hereinafter referred to as a “Payment”) to or for the benefit of the Administrative Agent or any other Finance Party shall be made without set-off or counterclaim, and without deduction or withholding for, or on account of, any and all present or future Taxes except to the extent that such deduction or withholding is required by law or the administrative practice of any Governing Authority. If any such Taxes are so required to be deducted or withheld from or in respect of any Payment made to or for the benefit of the Administrative Agent or any other Finance Party, the Borrower shall:

 

 (i) promptly notify the Administrative Agent of such requirement;

 

(ii) if the Tax is an Indemnified Tax, pay to the Administrative Agent or other Finance Party, as the case may be, in addition to the Payment to which the Administrative Agent or other Finance Party is otherwise entitled, such additional amount as is necessary to ensure that the net amount actually received by the Administrative Agent or other Finance Party (net of the full amount of any Indemnified Taxes required to be deducted or withheld from the Payment and any additional amount paid by the Borrower under this Section 6.4(a), whether assessable against the Borrower, the Administrative Agent or such other Finance Party) equals the full amount the Administrative Agent or other Finance Party, as the case may be, would have received had no such deduction or withholding been required;

 

- 30 -

 

(iii) make such deduction or withholding;

 

(iv) pay to the relevant Governing Authority in accordance with Applicable Law the full amount of Taxes required to be deducted or withheld (including the full amount of Taxes required to be deducted or withheld from any additional amount paid by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent or other Finance Party under this Section 6.4(a)) within the time period required by Applicable Law; and

 

(v) as promptly as possible thereafter, forward to the Administrative Agent or other Finance Party, as the case may be, an original official receipt (or a certified copy), or other documentation reasonably acceptable to the Administrative Agent or other Finance Party, evidencing such payment to such Governing Authority.

 

(b) In addition, the Borrower agrees to duly and timely pay any and all present or future Other Taxes to the relevant Governing Authority.

 

(c) The Borrower hereby indemnifies and holds harmless the Administrative Agent and each other Finance Party for the full amount of Indemnified Taxes and Other Taxes (including Indemnified Taxes imposed or asserted on or attributable to amounts payable under this Section 6.4), interest, penalties and other liabilities, levied, imposed or assessed against (and whether or not paid directly by) the Administrative Agent or any other Finance Party, as applicable, and for all expenses arising therefrom or with respect thereto, or resulting from or relating to the Borrower’s failure to:

 

  (i) remit to the Administrative Agent or any other Finance Party the documentation referred to in Section 6.4(a)(v); or

 

 (ii) pay any Taxes or Other Taxes when due to the relevant Governing Authority (including, without limitation, any Taxes imposed by any Governing Authority on amounts payable under this Section 6.4).

 

The provisions of this Section 6.4(c) shall apply whether or not such Taxes were correctly or legally imposed, asserted or assessed. The Administrative Agent or any other Finance Party who pays any Indemnified Taxes or Other Taxes, shall promptly notify the Borrower of such payment, provided, however, that failure to provide such notice shall not detract from, or compromise, the obligations of the Borrower under this Section 6.4. Payment pursuant to this indemnification shall be made within 30 days from the date the Administrative Agent or any other Finance Party, as the case may be, makes written demand therefor accompanied by a certificate as to the amount of such Indemnified Taxes or Other Taxes and the calculation thereof, which calculation shall be conclusive evidence of such amount absent manifest error.

 

- 31 -

  

(d) If the Borrower determines in good faith that a reasonable basis exists for contesting any Taxes for which a payment has been made under this Section 6.4, the relevant Finance Party, as applicable, shall, if so reasonably requested by the Borrower, reasonably cooperate with the Borrower in challenging such Taxes at the Borrower’s expense.

 

(e) If any Finance Party determines in its sole discretion exercised in good faith that it has received a refund of, or credit for, Taxes for which a payment has been made by the Borrower under this Section 6.4, which refund or credit is attributable to the Taxes giving rise to such payment made by the Borrower, then such Finance Party shall reimburse the Borrower for such amount (if any, without interest, but not exceeding the amount of any payment made under this Section 6.4 that gives rise to such refund or credit), net of any out-of-pocket expenses (including Taxes) of such Finance Party which such Finance Party determines in its absolute discretion exercised in good faith will leave it, after such reimbursement, in no worse after-Tax position than it would have been in if such Taxes had not been exigible. The Borrower, upon the request of the Administrative Agent or any other Finance Party, agrees to repay the Administrative Agent or other Finance Party, as the case may be, any portion of any such refund or credit paid over to the Borrower that the Administrative Agent or other Finance Party, as the case may be, is required to pay to the relevant Governing Authority and agrees to pay any interest, penalties or other charges paid by the Administrative Agent or other Finance Party, as the case may be, as a result of or related to such payment to such Governing Authority. Neither the Administrative Agent nor any other Finance Party shall be under any obligation to arrange its tax affairs in any particular manner so as to claim any refund or credit. None of the Finance Parties shall be obliged to disclose any information regarding its tax affairs or computations to the Borrower or any other Person in connection with this Section 6.4(e) or any other provision of this Section 6.4.

 

(f) Any Finance Party that is entitled to an exemption from or reduction of any Indemnified Taxes or Other Taxes with respect to any payments made under this agreement shall, at the sole cost and expense of the Borrower, deliver to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent, at the time or times reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, such properly completed and executed documentation as the Borrower or the Administrative Agent may reasonably request to permit such payments to be made without withholding or at a reduced rate of withholding.  In addition, each Finance Party, if reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent, shall, at the sole cost and expense of the Borrower, deliver such other documentation reasonably requested by the Borrower or the Administrative Agent as will enable the Borrower or the Administrative Agent to determine whether or not such Finance Party is subject to withholding or information reporting requirements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the preceding two sentences, the completion, execution and submission of such documentation shall not be required if, in the Finance Party’s sole discretion, acting reasonably, such completion, execution or submission would subject such Finance Party to any unreimbursed cost or expense or could reasonably be expected to materially prejudice, or be materially burdensome to, the legal or commercial position of such Finance Party.

 

- 32 -

  

(g) The provisions of this Section 6.4 shall survive without limitation the termination of the Credit Facility and this agreement and all other Credit Documents and the permanent repayment of the outstanding credit and all other amounts payable hereunder.

 

6.5 Environmental Indemnity

 

Each Obligor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties forthwith on demand by the Administrative Agent from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, damages, costs, losses, liabilities, penalties, obligations, judgements, charges and expenses (including without limitation, all reasonable and documented legal fees and disbursements on a solicitor and his own client basis) of any nature whatsoever, suffered or incurred by the Indemnified Parties or any of them in connection with the Credit Facility, whether as beneficiaries under the Credit Documents, as successors in interest of the Obligors or any of their Subsidiaries, or voluntary transfer in lieu of foreclosure, or otherwise howsoever, with respect to any Environmental Claims relating to the Assets of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries arising under any Environmental Laws as a result of the past, present or future operations of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries (or any predecessor in interest to the Borrower or its Subsidiaries), or the past, present or future condition of any part of the Assets of the Borrower or its Subsidiaries owned, operated or leased by the Borrower or its Subsidiaries (or any such predecessor in interest), including any liabilities arising as a result of any indemnity covering Environmental Claims given to any Person by the Lenders or an Agent or a Receiver or similar person appointed hereunder or under Applicable Law, in each case, acting reasonably (collectively, the “Indemnified Third Party”); but excluding any Environmental Claims or liabilities relating thereto to the extent that such Environmental Claims or liabilities arise by reason of the gross negligence or wilful misconduct of the Indemnified Party or the Indemnified Third Party claiming indemnity hereunder. In the case of indemnities covering Environmental Claims provided by an Agent or Lender in favour of an Indemnified Third Party, such Agent or Lender shall provide the Borrower with prompt notice of such indemnity; provided that, (i) neither of the Agents nor any Lender shall have any liability whatsoever for any failure to provide notice as aforesaid and (ii) the failure to provide such notice to the Borrower shall not in any manner affect the right of any Agent or any Lender to give notice of any claim under this Section 6.5. In all other cases, the Administrative Agent shall provide the Borrower with prompt notice of any indemnity covering Environmental Claims provided in favour of an Indemnified Third Party upon a Responsible Officer of the Administrative Agent becoming aware of such indemnity. The provisions of this Section shall survive the repayment of the Secured Obligations.

 

- 33 -

 

6.6 Benefit of Indemnities

  

For the purposes of providing the benefit of the indemnities contained in Sections 6.3 and 6.5 in favour of the Indemnified Parties and Indemnified Third Parties which are not a party hereto, the applicable Lender or Agent, as the case may be, shall, in addition to contracting on its own behalf, be deemed to be contracting as agent and trustee for and on behalf of such persons.

 

Article 7
REPAYMENTS AND PREPAYMENTS

 

7.1 Repayment of Credit Facility

 

(a) Mandatory Repayment on Maturity. The Borrower shall repay to the Lenders the outstanding principal amount of the Loans on the Maturity Date, together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon and all other Secured Obligations owing by the Obligors to and including such date.

 

(b) Mandatory Repayment upon a Change of Control. Upon the date of occurrence of a Change of Control, the Borrower shall repay to the Lenders the outstanding principal amount of the Loans together with a premium of two percent (2%) on such principal amount, together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon and all other Secured Obligations owing by the Obligors to and including such date.

 

(c) Mandatory Repayments from the Proceeds of Permitted Distributions. The Borrower shall, upon the occurrence of any Distribution described in paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) of the definition of Permitted Distributions, immediately repay the Loans, together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon and all other Secured Obligations owing by the Obligors to and including the date of such Distribution in the amounts stated in such subparagraphs as required to be used to repay such amounts..

 

7.2 Voluntary Prepayments under Credit Facility

 

The Borrower shall be entitled to prepay all or any portion of any outstanding Loan at any time, without premium or penalty if such prepayment is made solely from cash proceeds from operations of the Borrower or its Subsidiaries. If any prepayment is made with proceeds of (a) third-party debt funding (which funding must be in an amount sufficient to prepay the Secured Obligations in full if such funding does not constitute Permitted Debt), (b) the issuance of Equity Interests by the Borrower or (c) proceeds from the exercise of warrants, the Borrower shall prepay such amounts, together with (i) a premium of 2.0% on the principal amount prepaid and (ii) without duplication, all accrued and unpaid interest thereon and all other Secured Obligations owing by the Obligors to and including the date of such prepayment. Amounts which are prepaid as aforesaid may not be reborrowed.

 

7.3 Prepayment Notice

 

The Borrower shall give written notice to the Administrative Agent of each voluntary prepayment pursuant to Section 7.2. Such notice (a “Prepayment Notice”) shall be irrevocable, shall be given in accordance with Section 3.6 and shall specify:

 

- 34 -

 

(a) the amount of the prepayment to be made;

  

(b) the date on which the prepayment is to take place; and

 

(c) the source of the funds being used for the prepayment.

 

Article 8
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

 

8.1 Representations and Warranties

 

To induce the Lenders and the Agents to enter into this agreement and to induce the Lenders to advance the Loans hereunder, the Borrower hereby represents and warrants to the Lenders and the Agents, as of the date of this agreement and, as of the date of each advance of the Loans hereunder, as follows, and acknowledges and confirms that the Lenders and the Agents are relying upon such representations and warranties in entering into this agreement and in advancing the Loans hereunder and that such reliance by the Lenders and the Agents shall not be construed to be lessened or mitigated by any due diligence investigation that may be conducted by the Lenders or an Agent:

 

(a) Status and Power. Each Obligor is organized, validly existing and is subsisting in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction governing its existence. Each Obligor is qualified, registered or licensed in all Relevant Jurisdictions. Each Obligor has all requisite capacity, power and authority to own, hold under licence or lease its properties, to carry on its business as now conducted where the nature of its business activities require such qualification, registration or licensing, except to the extent that any failure to do so could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Each Obligor has all requisite corporate capacity to enter into, and carry out the transactions contemplated by, each Credit Document to which it is a party.

 

(b) Authorization and Enforcement. All necessary action, corporate or otherwise, has been taken to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of the Credit Documents by each Obligor which is a party thereto. Each Obligor has duly executed and delivered the Credit Documents to which it is a party. The Credit Documents to which each Obligor is a party are legal, valid and binding obligations of such Obligor, enforceable against such Obligor in accordance with their respective terms, except to the extent that the enforceability thereof may be limited by (i) applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium, reorganization and other laws of general application limiting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally, (ii) the fact that the courts may deny the granting or enforcement of equitable remedies and (iii) the fact that, pursuant to the Currency Act (Canada), no court in Canada may make an order expressed in any currency other than lawful money of Canada.

 

(c) Compliance with Other Instruments. The execution, delivery and performance by each Obligor of the Credit Documents to which it is a party, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein, (i) do not and will not conflict with, result in (A) any breach or violation of, or constitute a default under, the terms, conditions or provisions of the articles or constating documents or by laws of, or any shareholder agreement or declaration relating to, such Obligor or of any law, regulation, judgment, decree or order binding on or applicable to such Obligor or to which its property is subject or (B), any material breach or violation of, or constitute a default under, any Material Agreement, Permit or other instrument to which such Obligor is a party or is otherwise bound or by which such Obligor benefits or to which its Assets are subject, (ii) will not create or give rise to any Encumbrances on any Obligor’s Assets, except for any Encumbrance created or arising under the Credit Documents and (iii) do not require the consent or approval of any Governing Authority or any other party, other than such consents as have been obtained and are in effect.

 

- 35 -

 

(d) Financial Statements. The Financial Statements and the unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements for the Borrower were prepared in accordance with GAAP and no Material Adverse Change has occurred in the consolidated financial condition or operations of the Borrower since the date of such Financial Statements. The balance sheet contained in each of the Financial Statements and the unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements for the Borrower fairly presents in all material respects the consolidated financial condition of the Borrower as at the date thereof and the statements of income contained in the Financial Statements or the unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements for the Borrower, as applicable, fairly presents in all material respects the consolidated results of operations of the Borrower during the fiscal period covered thereby. Other than as disclosed in the Financial Statements or the unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements for the Borrower (including the notes thereto), there are no obligations (including contingent obligations) of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries of a material nature.

 

(e) Litigation, etc. Save and except as set out in Schedule I (which is up to date as of the Closing Date), there are no actions, suits, investigations, claims or proceedings which have been commenced or, to the knowledge of the Borrower, have been threatened in writing against or affecting any Obligor as to which there is a reasonable possibility of an adverse determination and that, if adversely determined, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

 

(f) Title to Assets. Each Obligor has good and marketable title to all of its property, assets and undertaking, free from any Encumbrances other than the Permitted Encumbrances.

 

(g) Conduct of Business. No Obligor is in violation of any Applicable Laws (including, without limitation, Environmental Laws) or Permits in a manner which could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Subject to Schedule O, each Obligor has all Permits which are required to own its properties and Assets and to operate its businesses where they are currently being operated, except (i) those Permits the absence of which could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect and (ii) those which are not now necessary and which are expected to be obtained in the ordinary course of business by the time they are necessary.

 

- 36 -

  

(h) No Default. No Default or Event of Default exists or would result from the incurring of any Secured Obligations. No Obligor is in default under any Material Agreement or under or with respect to any contractual obligation in any respect which, individually or together with all such defaults, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, or that would, if such default had occurred after the initial drawdown hereunder, create an Event of Default.

 

(i) Tax Returns and Taxes. Each Obligor has filed all material tax returns and tax reports required by law to have been filed by it and has paid all material taxes and governmental charges owing or payable by it, except any such taxes or charges which are being diligently contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which adequate reserves in accordance with GAAP shall have been set aside on its books.

 

(j) Consents, Approvals, etc. No consents, approvals, acknowledgements, undertakings, non-disturbance agreements, directions or other documents or instruments which have not already been provided to the Administrative Agent are required to be entered into by any Person (i) to implement the transactions at the times and in the manner contemplated by the Credit Documents, (ii) to make effective the Security created or intended to be created by any Obligor in favour of the Collateral Agent at the times and in the manner required pursuant to the Security Documents or (iii) to ensure the perfection and the intended priority of such Security at the times and in the manner required by the Credit Documents, other than financing statements filed in connection with such Security.

 

(k) Encumbrances. The Encumbrances granted to the Collateral Agent pursuant to the Security Documents are fully perfected first priority Encumbrances in and to the Secured Assets, subject only to Permitted Encumbrances.

 

(l) French Form of Corporate Name. As of the Closing Date, there is no French form of the corporate name of any Obligor.

 

(m) Assets Insured. The Obligors maintain insurance policies and coverage over the Secured Assets with insurers, in amounts, for risks and otherwise on terms (subject to the amount of such deductibles as are reasonable and normal in the circumstances) and against loss or damage as are customary for property in the nature of the Secured Assets and in the case of Persons engaged in the same or similar businesses and similarly situated and there is no material continuing default by the applicable Obligors insured under the provisions of such policies of insurance maintained.

 

(n) Corporate Structure. As of the Closing Date, Schedule E accurately sets out a corporate structure chart of the Obligors and their Subsidiaries.

 

- 37 -

 

(o) Employment and Labour Agreements. Each Obligor is in compliance with the terms and conditions of all collective bargaining agreements (if any) and other labour agreements to which it is subject, except where the failure to so comply could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

 

(p) Anti-Money Laundering Laws and Anti-Corruption Laws. Each Obligor is in compliance in all material respects, with the PATRIOT Act, the Bank Secrecy Act and AML Legislation or Anti-Corruption Laws (including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977) to the extent any such Obligor is legally required to comply with such laws. Each Obligor and its Subsidiaries has instituted and maintains in effect policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance by the Obligors, their Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents with applicable AML Legislation and Anti-Corruption Laws.

 

(q) No Material Adverse Effect. Since the date of the most recent Financial Statements of the Borrower furnished to the Administrative Agent, there has been no Material Adverse Change, and no event or circumstance has occurred that could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.

 

(r) Intellectual Property. Each Obligor has rights sufficient for it to use all the Intellectual Property reasonably necessary for the conduct of its business. No Obligor has received any notice of any claim of infringement or similar claim or proceeding relating to any of its Intellectual Property which, if determined against such Obligor, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

 

(s) Material Agreements and Permits.

 

(i) Schedule H accurately sets out all Material Agreements and Permits held (subject to Schedule O) by the Obligors as of the Closing Date.

 

(ii) Each Permit is valid, subsisting and in good standing and the Obligors are not in default or breach of any Permit and, to the knowledge of the Obligor, no proceeding is pending or has been threatened in writing by the applicable Governing Authority to revoke or terminate any Permit, except (A) where breach of the foregoing could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect and (b) those Permits which are not now necessary and which are expected to be obtained in the ordinary course of business by the time they are necessary.

 

(iii) The Obligors are not in default or breach of any Material Agreement and are not aware of any default thereunder by any party to any Material Agreement, in each case, where such breach or default could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

 

(t) Relevant Jurisdictions. Schedule F identifies in respect of each Obligor as of the Closing Date, the Relevant Jurisdictions including the full address of such Obligor’s chief executive office and all places of business and, if different, the address at which the books and records of such Obligor are located.

 

- 38 -

 

(u) Solvency. As at the Closing Date and after giving effect to the making of the Loans hereunder on such date, no Obligor is an Insolvent Person.

 

(v) Non-Arm’s Length Transactions. All agreements, arrangements or transactions between any Obligor, on the one hand, and any Affiliate of or other Person not dealing at Arm’s Length with such Obligor (other than another Obligor and other than ordinary course arrangements with any employee, management or director of an Obligor), on the other hand, in existence as of the Closing Date are set forth on Schedule J.

 

(w) Debt. There exists no Debt of an Obligor that is not Permitted Debt.

 

(x) Sanctions. To the best knowledge of the Borrower after due inquiry, neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries is in violation of any of the country or list based economic and trade sanctions administered and enforced by OFAC or the United States Department of State or under Canadian Sanctions Law (“Sanctions Laws”). No Obligor is a Canada Blocked Person or a Sanctioned Entity. No proceeds of any Loan will be used in any manner that will result in a violation by any Lender of any U.S. sanctions administered by OFAC or the United States Department of State or any Canadian Sanctions Law. Notwithstanding anything in this agreement, nothing in this agreement shall require the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries that are registered or incorporated under the laws of Canada or of a province thereof, or any officers, directors or employees thereof, to commit an act or omission that contravenes the Foreign Extraterritorial Measures (United States) Order, 1992.

 

(y) Environmental.

 

(i) Each Obligor and its Assets taken as a whole comply in all respects and the businesses, activities and operations of same and the use of such Assets and the processes and undertakings performed thereon comply in all respects with all Environmental Laws except to the extent that failure to so comply could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; further, no Obligor knows of any facts which result in or constitute or are likely to give rise to non-compliance with any Environmental Laws, which facts or non-compliance could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

 

(ii) No Obligor has received written notice of non-compliance with any Environmental Laws and, except as previously disclosed to an Agent in writing, has knowledge of any facts which could reasonably be expected to give rise to any notice of non-compliance with any Environmental Laws, which non-compliance has had or could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect and no Obligor has received any notice that any Obligor is a potentially responsible party for a federal, provincial, state, regional, municipal or local clean up or corrective action in connection with their respective properties, assets and undertakings where such clean up or corrective action has had or could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

 

- 39 -

 

(z) Securities Laws and Public Disclosure.

 

(i) The Borrower is in compliance in all material respects with all of its disclosure obligations under the Applicable Securities Laws. Each of the Disclosure Documents filed since January 1, 2017 was, as of the date thereof, in compliance in all material respects with the Applicable Securities Laws and did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. There is no fact or circumstance known to the Borrower which the Borrower has not publicly disclosed which materially adversely affects, or so far as the Borrower can reasonably foresee, could materially adversely affect, the assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise), affairs, business, capital, condition (financial or otherwise), operations or prospects of the Borrower or materially adversely affects, or so far as the Borrower can reasonably foresee, could materially adversely affect, the ability of the Borrower to perform its obligations under the Credit Facility. The Borrower has not filed any confidential material change reports with applicable securities regulators that have not been made public.

 

(ii) Since December 31, 2018, there has not occurred any material change in the assets, liabilities (absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise), affairs, business, capital, condition (financial or otherwise), operations or prospects of the Borrower and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, and no event has occurred or circumstance exists which could reasonably be expected to result in such a material change, which has not been publicly disclosed.

 

(iii) The Borrower has not disclosed to any Lender any “material fact” or “material change” (as such terms are defined under the Securities Act (Ontario)) with respect to the Borrower that has not been generally disclosed (as such term is used under the Securities Act (Ontario)).

 

(iv) No order or ruling preventing, ceasing or suspending trading in any securities of the Borrower or prohibiting the issue and sale of securities by the Borrower has been issued by any Governing Authority and no proceedings or investigations for such purposes have been instituted or, to the best of the knowledge of the Borrower, are pending or threatened by any Governing Authority.

 

(aa) Full Disclosure. All written information provided to an Agent or a Lender by or on behalf of the Obligors in connection with the Credit Facility is true and correct in all material respects and none of the documentation furnished to an Agent or any Lender by or on behalf the Obligors in connection with the Credit Facility omits or will omit when furnished, a material fact necessary in order to make the statements contained therein, taken as a whole, not materially misleading in light of the circumstances under which such statements are made.

 

- 40 -

 

8.2 Accredited Investor Status

 

Each Lender hereby represents and warrants that it is acquiring the Warrants being issued to it pursuant to the exemption provided by Section 2.3 of National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus Exemptions of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI 45-106”) as an “accredited investor” and is either acquiring the Warrants as principal for its own account, or is deemed to be acquiring the Warrants as principal for its own account in accordance with applicable securities laws and has completed, executed and delivered the Accredited Investor Status Certificate attached as Schedule K hereto and the information contained therein is true and correct. No Lender was created, and is being used, solely to acquire and hold the Warrants in reliance on an exemption from prospectus requirements under applicable securities laws. In addition, each Lender that is a U.S. Person hereby represents and warrants that it is an “accredited investor” that meets the criteria set forth in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the U.S. Securities Act and the Warrants are being issued to a limited number of Lenders that are U.S. Persons pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D under the U.S. Securities Act and exemptions from the qualification requirements under applicable state securities laws and has completed, executed and delivered the U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter attached as Schedule L hereto and the information contained therein is true and correct.

 

8.3 Survival of Representations and Warranties

 

All of the representations and warranties of the Borrower contained in Section 8.1 and of the Lenders contained in Section 8.2 shall survive the execution and delivery of this agreement and shall continue until the Secured Obligations Termination Date, notwithstanding any investigation made at any time by or on behalf of the Administrative Agent or any of the Lenders.

 

Article 9
COVENANTS

 

9.1 Affirmative Covenants

 

The Borrower hereby covenants and agrees with the Agents and the Lenders that, until the Secured Obligations Termination Date, or unless waived in writing in accordance with Section 12.13:

 

(a) To Pay Taxes. Each Obligor shall file all material Tax returns required to be filed by it with the relevant Governing Authority and timely and duly pay or cause to be paid all material Taxes due and payable by it to the relevant Governing Authority, save and except when and so long as the validity of any such Taxes that are in good faith being contested by appropriate proceedings and for which the applicable Obligor is maintaining adequate reserves.

 

(b) Existence and Conduct of Business. Each Obligor shall maintain its existence in good standing (subject to Section 9.2(i)) and do or cause to be done all things necessary to keep in full force and effect all necessary Permits, rights, licences and qualifications to carry on business in any jurisdiction in which it carries on business, except where such failure could not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all mineral concessions referred to in Schedule H, as such mineral concessions may be renewed or extended from time to time (and all additional mineral concessions obtained after the date of this agreement, if any, required for the construction, development or operation of the Camino Rojo Project or Cerro Quema Project) shall be maintained in full force and effect; provided that each Obligor may relinquish any mining concession that is not required for the construction, development or operation of the Camino Rojo Project or the Cerro Quema Project upon one Banking Day’s prior written notice to the Administrative Agent of such Obligor’s intention to do so.

 

- 41 -

 

(c) Compliance with Applicable Laws. Each Obligor shall (i) comply with all Applicable Laws (including compliance with all Environmental Laws), except where the failure to do so could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect and (ii) comply with all AML Legislation, Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions Laws.

 

(d) Reporting. The Borrower shall deliver to the Administrative Agent for further distribution to the Lenders:

 

(i) during the construction of the Camino Rojo Project, monthly financial reports prepared for management and the board of directors of the Borrower concurrently with delivery of such reports to the management and board of directors of the Borrower;

 

(ii) following completion of the construction of the Camino Rojo Project:

 

(A) within 45 days after the end of each of the first three Fiscal Quarters of the Borrower in each Fiscal Year, unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements for the Borrower; and

 

(B) within 90 days after the end of each Fiscal Year of the Borrower, annual audited consolidated financial statements for the Borrower, including separated results for the fourth Fiscal Quarter of such Fiscal Year;

 

(iii) concurrently with the delivery of the financial statements described in paragraphs (ii)(A) and (ii)(B), an executed and completed compliance certificate, in the form attached as Schedule B, evidencing compliance with the terms of this agreement;

 

(iv) prompt notice of any Default or Event of Default after the Borrower learns of the occurrence thereof;

 

(v) prompt notice of any (u) Material Adverse Change, (v) material litigation, (w) threatened or pending material environmental investigation or claim, and (x) proceedings or actions related to any Permits; and

 

(vi) prompt notice of (and if requested, a copy of) each Material Agreement (and any amendment thereto) to which any Obligor is a party or becomes a party.

 

- 42 -

 

Information required to be delivered pursuant to Section 9.1(d)(ii) shall be deemed to have been delivered on the date on which such information has been posted on the Borrower’s website on the Internet, at www.sedar.com or at another website identified by the Borrower by notice to the Administrative Agent and accessible by the Lenders without charge.

 

(e) Use of Proceeds. The Borrower shall apply all of the proceeds of the Additional Capital to (i) finance the construction and/or the development of the Camino Rojo Project (including early project works, purchasing long-lead items and working capital needs related to the Camino Rojo Project), (ii) [commercially sensitive information redacted], and (iii) fund the normal course general and administrative expenses of the Obligors consistent with previous practice of such Obligors (provided that no proceeds of the Additional Capital shall be used to fund the exploration, development or construction of the Cerro Quema Project). For greater certainty, the aforementioned proceeds of the Additional Capital may not be used in any manner whatsoever in connection with the acquisition, development, construction or operation of, or investment in, any mine, property or business that will not be subject to the Security and a first ranking Encumbrance (subject to Permitted Encumbrances other than any Encumbrance in respect of (x) Debt described in subparagraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of Debt, and (y) Debt incurred in subparagraphs (g) and (h) of the definition of Debt as credit support for the Debt described in subparagraph (x) immediately above) in favour of the Finance Parties.

 

(f) Reimbursement of Expenses. The Borrower shall (i) reimburse each Agent, on demand, for all reasonable out-of-pocket costs, charges and expenses incurred by or on behalf of such Agent (including, without limitation, the reasonable and documented legal fees, disbursements and other charges of counsel incurred by such Agent) in connection with the negotiation, preparation, execution, delivery, syndication, administration and interpretation of the Credit Documents and the closing documentation ancillary to the completion of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby (for greater certainty, on or before the Closing Date) and any amendments and waivers hereto (whether or not consummated or entered into), and any search fees, (ii) reimburse each Agent within seven (7) days following demand (or if an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, on demand), for all reasonable out-of-pocket costs, charges and expenses incurred by or on behalf of such Agent (including the documented fees, disbursements and other charges of counsel) incurred in connection with the ongoing administration of the Credit Documents and (iii) reimburse the Agents and the Lenders, on demand, for all reasonable out-of-pocket costs, charges and expenses incurred by or on behalf of any of them (including the documented fees, disbursements and other charges of counsel) incurred in connection with the enforcement of the Credit Documents.

 

(g) Prompt Payment. Each Obligor shall duly and punctually pay or cause to be paid to the Lenders and the Agents all amounts payable under this agreement and the other Credit Documents on the due dates and at the places, in the currency and in the manner mentioned herein.

 

- 43 -

 

(h) Operation of Assets. Each Obligor shall operate its businesses and properties and conduct all operations in accordance with prudent industry practice in all material respects, and in accordance with Applicable Law and with the terms and provisions of applicable Permits in all material respects, except, in each case, where such the failure to do so could not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

 

(i) Books and Records. Each Obligor shall at all times maintain proper records and books of account and therein make true and correct entries of all dealings and transactions relating to its business.

 

(j) Inspection. Each Obligor shall, upon reasonable notice, permit representatives of, or consultants to, the Collateral Agent and Lenders (as a group), during regular business hours, subject to compliance with applicable health and safety protocols, to inspect any of its Assets, and conduct environmental site assessments and/or compliance audits, as required by the Collateral Agent (at the direction of the Arranging Lender or the Majority Lenders, acting reasonably), examine and report on all insurance maintained by or on behalf of each Obligor, as required by the Collateral Agent (at the direction of the Arranging Lender or the Majority Lenders, acting reasonably) and to examine and take extracts from its books and records, including but not limited to books and records stored in computer data banks and computer software systems, and to discuss its financial condition with its senior officers and (in the presence of such of its representatives as it may designate) its auditors; provided that, prior to an Event of Default that is continuing, all such visits, inspections and inquiries shall occur not more than once in any Fiscal Year.

 

(k) Other Information. The Borrower shall, with reasonable promptness, provide to the Agents such other books of account, records, reports, and other papers and information relating to any Obligor or relating to the ability of any Obligor to perform its obligations under this agreement or any other Credit Document to which it is a party as, from time to time, may be reasonably requested by an Agent, including information readily available to the Borrower explaining the Borrower’s financial statements if such information has been reasonably requested.

 

(l) Insurance.

 

(i) Each Obligor shall maintain insurance in such types and in such amounts as are customary in the case of Persons engaged in the same or similar business as the Obligors and similarly situated. The Collateral Agent, on behalf of the Finance Parties, shall be designated as a first loss payee on all of the Obligors’ property policies, and all of the Obligors’ liability insurance policies shall designate the Collateral Agent and “the Lenders from time to time under the Loan Agreement” as additional insured parties.

 

(ii) To the extent that the Administrative Agent receives any proceeds of any property or casualty insurance policy maintained by an Obligor hereunder and:

 

- 44 -

 

(A) the aggregate amount of such proceeds (excluding proceeds which have been either (y) previously reinvested in productive Assets of an Obligor, or (z) committed to be reinvested solely in other productive Assets of an Obligor pursuant to a binding contractual commitment, purchase order or similar binding legal instrument and which are segregated in an account of such Obligor containing only such proceeds (and are not comingled with any other Assets of such Obligor)) is less than $5,000,000 in the aggregate for all such proceeds at any time then, provided that no Default has occurred and is continuing, the Administrative Agent shall promptly deliver such proceeds to the Borrower or the other applicable Obligor to be applied in the reinvestment of Assets of the Borrower or other Obligor, as applicable; or

 

(B) the aggregate amount of such proceeds (excluding proceeds which have been either (y) previously reinvested in productive Assets of an Obligor, or (z) committed to be reinvested solely in other productive Assets of an Obligor pursuant to a binding contractual commitment, purchase order or similar binding legal instrument and which are segregated in an account of such Obligor containing only such proceeds (and are not comingled with any other Assets of such Obligor)) is equal to or exceeds $5,000,000 in the aggregate for all such proceeds at any time (“Restricted Insurance Proceeds”) then, provided that (I) no Default has occurred and is continuing, (II) such Obligor, as applicable, undertakes to repair, restore, replace or otherwise remedy any damage or destruction of its Assets giving rise to such proceeds, or reinvest the proceeds in other productive Assets, in a manner satisfactorily described in a written plan delivered to the Agent within thirty (30) days of payment of such proceeds by the applicable insurer (a “Reinvestment Plan”), and (III) such Reinvestment Plan has been approved by the Majority Lenders (acting reasonably), the Administrative Agent shall release the Restricted Insurance Proceeds to the Borrower or other applicable Obligor for application towards such repair, restoration, replacement or reinvestment in accordance with the Reinvestment Plan and reasonable disbursement procedures to be agreed to by the Borrower or other Obligor as applicable, on the one hand, and the Administrative Agent, on the other hand. To the extent that the Majority Lenders do not approve of the Reinvestment Plan as aforesaid, or no Reinvestment Plan is delivered in the manner and time period described above, the Administrative Agent shall apply the Restricted Insurance Proceeds to permanently reduce the Secured Obligations.

 

(iii) For certainty, any insurance proceeds arising from the relevant Secured Assets on or after the occurrence of an Event of Default that is continuing shall be applied in accordance with Section 12.21.

 

- 45 -

 

(m) Change in Scheduled Information. If any of the information contained in Schedule E and/or F shall change, the Borrower shall promptly notify the Administrative Agent in writing of the details of such change within 10 days thereof, and Schedule E and/or Schedule F, as the case may be, shall thereupon be deemed to be amended accordingly.

 

(n) Change of Name or Jurisdiction of Incorporation. If any Obligor changes its corporate name, adopts a French form of name or changes its jurisdiction of organization or the jurisdiction of its location for the purposes of the PPSA or other Applicable Laws applicable to the Security, the Borrower shall promptly notify the Collateral Agent in writing of the details of such change or adoption and Section 8.1(l), as the case may be, shall thereupon be deemed to be amended accordingly.

 

(o) Material Agreements. Each Obligor shall at all times be and remain in compliance in all material respects with all of its covenants, agreements and obligations in and diligently enforce all its material rights under all Material Agreements to which it is a party, except where the failure to do so could not reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.

 

(p) [commercially sensitive information redacted]

 

(q) Working Capital. The Obligors shall, at all times on and after the advance of the Tranche One Loan, maintain (on an unconsolidated basis) an aggregate minimum net working capital of no less than $5,000,000; provided that each calculation of net working capital shall exclude the amount of the Minera Peñasquito Indebtedness after such time that the Minera Peñasquito Indebtedness becomes due and payable in accordance with the terms of the agreement governing such indebtedness (as such terms exist on the Closing Date).

 

(r) Additional Guarantors. With respect to any Person that becomes a Restricted Subsidiary of the Borrower after the Closing Date, the Borrower shall promptly (and in any event within 30 days after such Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary) (i) pledge and deliver to the Collateral Agent the certificates, if any, representing all of the equity interests of such Restricted Subsidiary, together with undated stock powers or other appropriate instruments of transfer duly executed and delivered by an authorized officer of the holder(s) required pursuant to Applicable Laws in order to grant a first priority Encumbrance over such equity interests in favour of the Collateral Agent, and all intercompany notes owing from such Restricted Subsidiary to any Obligor, together with instruments of transfer executed and delivered in blank by a duly authorized officer of such Obligor, (ii) cause such Restricted Subsidiary (i) to execute (A) a guarantee or such comparable documentation to become a Guarantor and (B) Security Documents as required to grant, in favour of the Collateral Agent, an Encumbrance on the Secured Assets of such Restricted Subsidiary, substantially in the form delivered by the Obligors, and (iii) to take all actions necessary in the opinion of the Administrative Agent (acting on the written instructions of the Majority Lenders), acting reasonably, to cause the Encumbrance created by the applicable Security Document to be perfected to the extent required by such Security Document in accordance with all Applicable Law, including the filing of financing statements, filings in applicable land registry offices or such other filings and notices in such jurisdictions as may be reasonably requested by the Collateral Agent (acting at the written direction of the Majority Lenders).

 

- 46 -

 

(s) Environmental Covenants.

 

(i) Each Obligor shall conduct their business and operations so as to comply at all times with all Environmental Laws if the consequence of a failure to comply, either alone or in connection with any other such non-compliances, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

 

(ii) If any Obligor shall:

 

(A) receive or give any notice that a violation of any Environmental Law has or may have been committed or is about to be committed by the same, and if such violation has or could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect;

 

(B) receive any notice that a complaint, proceeding or order has been filed or is about to be filed against the same alleging a violation of any Environmental Law, and if such violation could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; or

 

(C) receive any notice requiring it to take any action in connection with the release of Hazardous Materials into the environment or alleging that it is be liable or responsible for costs associated with a response to or to clean up a Release of Hazardous Materials into the environment,

 

it shall promptly provide each Agent with a copy of such notice and shall furnish to the each Agent from time to time all reasonable information requested by the Administrative Agent relating to the same.

 

(t) Registrations. The Borrower shall record, file or register, at its own expense, applications for registration or financing statements (and continuation or financing change statements when applicable), and make any other registrations or filings, including where required, the registration of each of the Security Documents (collectively, “Registrations”) with respect to the Secured Assets now existing and hereafter created or arising and the creation of Encumbrances therein under and as contemplated by the Security Documents, meeting the requirements of Applicable Law, in such manner and in such jurisdictions as are necessary or desirable to protect, perfect and maintain the protection and perfection of, such Encumbrances, and to deliver a file stamped copy of each such Registration or other evidence of such Registration to the Collateral Agent; provided that, for greater certainty, the initial recordings, filings and registrations in respect of the Security Documents to be executed and delivered as a condition to the advance of the Tranche One Loan, and the Tranche Two Loan and Tranche Three Loan, as applicable, shall only be required to be made at the times required in accordance with the applicable conditions precedent set out in Sections 10.1 and 10.3, as applicable. If any Obligor (i) changes its corporate name, adopts a French form of name or changes its jurisdiction of organization or the jurisdiction of its location for the purposes of the PPSA or other Applicable Laws applicable to the Security, or (ii) takes any other action, which in any such case would, under the Applicable Law, require the amendment of any Registration recorded, registered and filed in accordance with the provisions hereof, the Borrower shall promptly file such Registrations as are necessary or desirable to continue the perfection of the Encumbrances in the Secured Assets intended under the Security Documents. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Borrower shall promptly notify the Collateral Agent of all Registrations made or required to be made, together with all customary and pertinent details relating to each such Registration and the Security covered thereby. The Collateral Agent may, but shall be under no obligation whatsoever to, record, file or register any Registration, or make any other recording, filing or registration in connection herewith or with the Security Documents.

 

- 47 -

 

(u) Further Assurances. Each Obligor shall, at the Borrower’s sole expense, execute any and all further documents, financing statements, agreements and instruments, and take all further action that may be required under Applicable Law, or that the Collateral Agent may reasonably request (acting at the written direction of the Majority Lenders), in order to grant, preserve, protect and perfect the validity and intended priority of the Encumbrances created or intended to be created by the Security Documents in the Secured Assets.

 

9.2 Restrictive Covenants

 

The Borrower hereby covenants and agrees with the Agents and the Lenders that, until the Secured Obligations Termination Date, or unless waived in writing in accordance with Section 12.13:

 

(a) Permitted Debt. No Obligor shall incur, create, assume or suffer to exist any Debt in excess of [commercially sensitive information redacted] in the aggregate for all such Obligors, other than Permitted Debt.

 

(b) Permitted Encumbrances. No Obligor shall incur, create, or suffer to exist any Encumbrance, other than Permitted Encumbrances.

 

(c) Streams and Royalties. No Obligor shall grant a stream, royalty or like interest in or related to the Assets of such Obligor which form part of the Camino Rojo Project or the Cerro Quema Project without the prior written consent of the Majority Lenders; provided that, (i) royalties in existence as of the date of this agreement which, for greater certainty, do not include royalties relating to the Cerro Quema Project other than as disclosed on Schedule M, (ii) royalties required by any Governing Authority in Mexico or Panama in connection with the Camino Rojo Project or Cerro Quema Project, and (iii) [commercially sensitive information redacted].

 

- 48 -

 

(d) Investments. No Obligor shall make any Investment using proceeds of the Additional Capital, other than Permitted Investments. For greater certainty, except for Investments made by the Borrower in Camino Rojo, no Investments may be made by any Obligor in any Subsidiary other than Investments funded using (x) proceeds of a Permitted Distribution that are not required to be used to repay the Loans, accrued and unpaid interest thereon and other Secured Obligations in accordance with the terms of this agreement, or (y) the proceeds of additional capital raised by the Borrower (in excess of, and excluding, the proceeds of the Additional Equity).

 

(e) Comingling. The Additional Capital shall not be comingled or otherwise combined with any of the Assets of any Subsidiary of the Borrower that is not an Obligor.

 

(f) Business Activities. No Obligor shall conduct any business other than (i) the exploration, extraction, processing and sale of base metals, precious metals and by-products derived therefrom, and (ii) such other business that is the same, similar or otherwise related, ancillary or complimentary thereto, in each case which does not detract from the continued construction, development, operation, viability and prospects of the Camino Rojo Project.

 

(g) Distributions. No Obligor shall make, declare or pay any Distributions without obtaining prior written consent from the Majority Lenders, other than Permitted Distributions.

 

(h) Dispositions. No Obligor shall sell, transfer, lease or otherwise convey (each, an “Asset Disposition”) all or any part of its Assets without the prior written consent of the Majority Lenders, except for (i) the sale, transfer or other disposition in the ordinary course of business of inventory, obsolete, scrap and worn-out material, equipment or other assets (ii) transactions between Obligors permitted pursuant to Section 9.2(m), (iii) any sale, transfer or other disposition of Assets relating to, any sulphide project pursuant to the Option Agreement dated November 7, 2017 among the Borrower, CR Acquisitions Ltd., Camino Rojo and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (as successor to Goldcorp Inc.) (“NGC”) (as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time to increase the interest that NGC may acquire in any such sulfide project), (iv) any sale, transfer or other disposition of the Equity Interests of Monitor Gold Corp.; provided that, the consideration received therefor remains subject to the Security, and (v) the sale of other Assets of such Obligor with a fair market value not exceeding $5,000,000 in the aggregate in any Fiscal Year (each sale in this clause (v), an “Other Asset Disposition”) provided that, in the case of such Other Asset Disposition, such Obligor shall (subject to subparagraph (z) below) have the right, within 180 days thereof, to reinvest the proceeds of such Other Asset Disposition in assets useful for the operation of its business provided that (x) no Default has occurred and is continuing, (y) if the proceeds of such Other Asset Disposition arise from the sale of Secured Assets, the assets subject to such reinvestment shall at all times be subject to the Security, and (z) if the proceeds of such Other Asset Disposition are not so reinvested within such 180 day period, the Net Cash Proceeds of such Other Asset Disposition are immediately applied to repayment of the Loans in accordance with Section 7.2; and (vi) the disposition of the Cerro Quema Project to a Person dealing at Arm’s Length with the Obligors (each of (i) through (vi), a “Permitted Asset Disposition”); provided further that the Borrower shall, in the case of any proposed sale of the Cerro Quema Project, provide written notice to the Lenders at least 10 Banking Days prior to (x) launching any sales process for the Cerro Quema Project or, (y) if no such sales process is launched, entering into any agreement for the sale of the Cerro Quema Project; and provided further that the Net Cash Proceeds from any Disposition of the Cerro Quema Project shall be applied as a permanent prepayment of the Loans in accordance with Section 7.2.

 

- 49 -

 

(i) Consolidation, Merger, Amalgamation; Transfer of All Assets. No Obligor shall (a) consolidate with, or merge or amalgamate with or into, any other Person other than with another Obligor and provided that the Administrative Agent is satisfied, acting reasonably, in each case that (x) the Borrower and each other successor remains liable under all applicable Transaction Documents in accordance with all Applicable Laws, and (y) that all Security remains binding and perfected first priority security under all Applicable Laws (subject to Permitted Encumbrances); or (b) sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its Assets in any manner whatsoever.

 

(j) Constating Documents. No Obligor shall enter into any transaction to change or amend its articles, by-laws or any other constating documents to create any new class or classes of shares or equity interests whatsoever.

 

(k) Terrorism Sanctions Regulations. No Obligor shall (a) become a Blocked Person or a Canada Blocked Person, or (b) have any Investments in or engage in any dealings or transactions with any Blocked Person or Canada Blocked Person except in accordance with Applicable Law and in a manner where such investments, transactions or dealings would not cause the purchase, holding or receipt of any payment or exercise of any rights in respect of the Credit Facility by an Agent or a Lender to be in violation of any laws or regulations administered by OFAC or any similar Governing Authority of any jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this agreement shall require any Obligor that is registered or incorporated under the laws of Canada or of a province to commit an act or omission that contravenes the Foreign Extraterritorial Measures (United States) Order, 1992.

 

(l) Hedging. The Obligors shall not enter into any Hedging Agreement for speculative purposes.

 

(m) Transactions with Affiliates. No Obligor shall enter into, directly or indirectly, any transaction or group of related transactions (including without limitation the purchase, lease, sale or exchange of Assets of any kind or the rendering of any service) with any Affiliate of such Obligor on terms materially less favourable to such Obligor than would be obtainable in a comparable Arm’s Length transaction in the ordinary course of business; provided that such restriction will not apply to (i) any transaction where such Obligor is the net beneficiary of such arrangement, (ii) transaction between or among Obligors and not involving any of their Affiliates and (iii) any Permitted Distribution, Permitted Debt or Permitted Investment.

 

- 50 -

 

(n) Change of Control. No Obligor shall enter into, directly or indirectly, any transaction or group of related transactions that results a Change of Control.

 

(o) Subsidiaries. No Obligor shall have any Restricted Subsidiaries other than those set out on Schedule E, except as permitted in accordance and in compliance with Section 9.1(r).

 

(p) Fiscal Year. The Borrower shall not change its Fiscal Year end.

 

(q) Additional Equity. No portion of the Additional Equity shall be redeemed, retracted or repaid, and no payments of any kind shall be made to the holders thereof on account of such Additional Equity, in any amount or in any manner whatsoever while any Secured Obligations are outstanding.

 

(r) Consulting Fees, Etc. No Obligor shall pay any consulting fee, management fee, bonus or similar fee to its shareholders or Affiliates, or any employee, officer or director thereof, save and except for payments made on terms that would be obtainable in a comparable Arm’s Length transaction in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice or prudent industry practice.

 

9.3 Performance of Covenants by Administrative Agent

 

At any time that an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, either Agent may, on the instructions of the Majority Lenders and upon notice by such Agent to the Borrower, perform any covenant of the Borrower under this agreement or any other Credit Document which the Borrower fails to perform or cause to be performed and which such Agent is capable of performing, including any covenants the performance of which requires the payment of money, provided that such Agent shall not be obligated to perform any such covenant on behalf of the Borrower and no such performance by such Agent shall require such Agent to further perform the Borrower’s covenants or shall operate as a derogation of the rights and remedies of such Agent and the Lenders under this agreement or any other Credit Document or as a waiver of such covenant by such Agent. Any amounts paid by such Agent as aforesaid shall be reimbursed by the Lenders in their Pro Rata Shares and shall be repaid by the Borrower to such Agent on behalf of the Lenders on demand.

 

- 51 -

 

Article 10
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

 

10.1 Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness of this Agreement

 

The effectiveness of this agreement on the Closing Date and the obligations of the applicable Lenders to extend the Tranche One Loan to the Borrower by way of drawdown under the Credit Facility is subject to fulfillment of (or waiver pursuant to Section 12.13) of the following conditions precedent:

 

(a) the Administrative Agent’s and counsel to the Arranging Lender’s receipt of the following:

 

(i) original counterparts of this agreement, executed by a Responsible Officer of the Borrower;

 

(ii) each Security Document described as Tranche One Security Documents on Schedule G, executed by each Obligor party thereto;

 

(iii) a certified copy of the articles of incorporation or amalgamation, and by-laws (or analogous organizational documents) of each Obligor and any shareholders’ agreement of each Obligor;

 

(iv) a certificate of status or good standing (or equivalent) for each Obligor issued by the appropriate Governing Authority of the jurisdiction in which each Obligor, as applicable, is incorporated or formed, to the extent available in such jurisdiction;

 

(v) a certified copy of the resolution of the board of directors (or equivalent) of each Obligor executed by a Responsible Officer, authorizing it to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under the Transaction Documents to which it is party or is to be a party on or after the date of this agreement, respectively;

 

(vi) a certificate executed by a Responsible Officer, setting forth specimen signatures of the individuals of each Obligor authorized to sign the Transaction Documents to which it is party or is to be a party on or after the date of this agreement, respectively; and

 

(vii) a certificate of the Borrower, certifying that no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing on the Closing Date or would arise after giving effect to the Transaction Documents executed and delivered on the Closing Date;

 

(b) there shall not have occurred any material adverse effect on (i) the business, operations, property, assets, liabilities (actual or contingent) or condition (financial or otherwise) of the Obligors taken as a whole or (ii) metals prices, commodity prices, the economy or financial markets that disproportionately affect the Obligors, taken as a whole;

 

(c) the Administrative Agent and the Lenders shall have received all requisite information to identify each Obligor under the applicable “know your client” and AML Legislation delivered at least five 5 Banking Days prior to the Closing Date to enable the Administrative Agent and the Tranche One Lenders to complete such identification;

 

- 52 -

 

(d) the Administrative Agent and counsel to the Arranging Lender shall have received evidence that all insurance required to be maintained pursuant to Section 9.1(l) has been obtained and is in effect and that each Obligor is in compliance with the requirements of Section 9.1(l);

 

(e) the Administrative Agent and counsel to the Arranging Lender shall have received copies of a recent Encumbrance and judgment search in each jurisdiction reasonably requested by counsel to the Arranging Lender with respect to the Obligors and the Security Documents described as Tranche One Security Documents on Schedule G;

 

(f) the Arranging Lender shall have completed all business, legal and financial due diligence and be satisfied with the results thereof, in its sole discretion, acting reasonably;

 

(g) the Administrative Agent and counsel to the Arranging Lender shall have received, in form and substance satisfactory to the Agents, their counsel and counsel to the Arranging Lender, acting reasonably, a customary opinion of counsel to each of the Obligors (in each applicable jurisdiction), addressed to the Lenders and the Agents, relating, without limitation, to the status and capacity of the Obligors, the due authorization by the Obligors, execution and delivery by the Obligors and the validity and enforceability of the Transaction Documents (save for the Security Documents described as Tranche Two/Three Security Documents on Schedule G), the validity and perfection of the Encumbrances created by the Security Documents, including perfection by control if applicable under relevant Applicable Laws (save for the Security Documents described as Tranche Two/Three Security Documents on Schedule G), non-contravention or breach of constating documents and Applicable Laws, the completion of all required filings and registrations with the applicable Governing Authority in respect of the Transaction Documents (save for the Security Documents described as Tranche Two/Three Security Documents on Schedule G) and the obtaining of all relevant Governing Authority approvals in respect of the Transaction Documents (save for the Security Documents described as Tranche Two/Three Security Documents on Schedule G) and such other customary matters as the Administrative Agent (on instructions of counsel to the Arranging Lender) may reasonably request;

 

(h) all fees and expenses of the Agents and the Arranging Lender due and payable hereunder on or prior to Closing, including, to the extent invoiced, all reasonable and documented legal fees and expenses required to be reimbursed or paid by the Borrower hereunder or under any other Credit Document, shall have been paid by the Borrower in full;

 

(i) the Borrower shall have provided to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders all other documents provided for herein.

 

(j) the representations and warranties of the Borrower and each other Obligor contained in Article 8 or any other Credit Document shall be true and correct in all respects, in each case as of the Closing Date (unless such representations and warranties specifically refer to an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be true and correct as of such earlier date);

 

- 53 -

 

(k) no Default or Event of Default shall exist or would arise immediately upon the Closing Date;

 

(l) the Administrative Agent and counsel to the Arranging Lender shall have received, to the satisfaction of the Arranging Lender, evidence that the Borrower has complied with all applicable regulatory (including from the Toronto Stock Exchange), corporate and governmental requirements, including any required consents and approvals in respect of the drawdown of the Tranche One Loan and the issuance of the Warrants, separately as applicable;

 

(m) no litigation or similar proceeding enjoining or restricting the Credit Facility shall have occurred and be continuing;

 

(n) each of the Lenders has received its Pro Rata Share of the Warrants;

 

(o) registrations and filings to perfect the Security created or intended to be created by the Tranche One Security Documents specified on Schedule G under the laws of British Columbia and any other applicable Canadian jurisdiction required to perfect such Security shall have been made, in form and substance satisfactory to counsel for the Arranging Lender (excluding, for greater certainty, any requirement for perfection under the local laws of any non-Canadian jurisdiction) and a notation shall have been made on the shareholder register of each of the Restricted Subsidiaries, if applicable, noting the pledge and granting of security to the Collateral Agent, on behalf of the Lenders, over all of the securities of such Restricted Subsidiaries;

 

(p) the physical share certificates representing all of the shares of Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema, duly endorsed in blank, shall have been delivered to the Collateral Agent; and

 

(q) the Administrative Agent and counsel to the Arranging Lender shall have received a certificate signed by a Responsible Officer of the Borrower confirming the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the preceding clauses (j) and (k) as of the Closing Date.

 

10.2 Conditions Precedent to All Loans

 

The obligation of the Lenders to make each Loan hereunder is subject to fulfillment of the following conditions precedent on the date each advance of the Loan is extended:

 

(a) the Borrower shall have complied with the requirements of Article 4 in respect of the relevant Loan;

 

(b) no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing or would arise immediately after giving effect to or as a result of the advance of the relevant Loan;

 

(c) the representations and warranties of the Borrower contained in all Credit Documents and Article 8 shall be true and correct in all respects on the date such advance of the relevant Loan is made as if such representations and warranties were made on such date (unless such representations and warranties specifically refer to an earlier date, in which case such representation and warranties shall be true and correct as of such earlier date); and

 

- 54 -

 

(d) the Administrative Agent and counsel to the Arranging Lender shall have received a certificate signed by the Borrower confirming the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the preceding clauses (b) and  (c) as of the date such advance of the relevant Loan is made.

 

10.3 Conditions Precedent to Tranche Two Loan and Tranche Three Loan

 

The obligations of the Lenders to advance the Tranche Two Loan or Tranche Three Loan to the Borrower is subject to fulfillment of the following conditions precedent on or prior to the date of the applicable advance:

 

(a) the conditions precedent set forth in Section  10.2 shall have been satisfied;

 

(b) the Administrative Agent’s and counsel to the Arranging Lender’s receipt of the following:

 

(i) original counterparts each Credit Document not previously delivered pursuant to Sections 10.1;

 

(ii) if not previously delivered as a condition to the advance of the Tranche Two Loan;

 

(A) to the extent there has been any amendment, change or other modification thereto since the Closing Date, a certified copy of the articles of incorporation or amalgamation, and by-laws (or analogous organizational documents) of each Obligor and any shareholders’ agreement of such Obligor;

 

(B) a certificate of status or good standing (or equivalent) for each Obligor issued by the appropriate Governing Authority of the jurisdiction in which such Obligor, as applicable, is incorporated or formed, to the extent available in such jurisdiction;

 

(C) to the extent there has been any amendment, change or other modification thereto since the Closing Date, a certified copy of the resolution of the board of directors (or equivalent) of each Obligor executed by a Responsible Officer authorizing it to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under each such Credit Document required to be delivered pursuant to Section 10.3(b)(i) to which it is party;

 

(D) a certificate executed by a Responsible Officer of each Obligor delivering any Credit Document required to be delivered pursuant to Section 10.3(b)(i) setting forth specimen signatures of the individuals authorized to sign each such Credit Document to which it is party; and

 

- 55 -

 

(iii) a certificate executed by a Responsible Officer of the Borrower certifying that no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing as of the date of the advance of the Tranche Two Loan or Tranche Three Loan, as applicable, or would arise after giving effect to the advance of such Loan;

 

(c) the Administrative Agent and counsel to the Arranging Lender shall have received, in form and substance satisfactory to the Agents, their counsel and counsel to the Arranging Lender, acting reasonably, a customary opinion of counsel to each Obligor (in each applicable jurisdiction), addressed to the Lenders and the Agents, relating, without limitation, to the status and capacity of such Obligors, the due authorization by such Obligors, execution and delivery by such Obligors and the validity and enforceability of such Credit Documents, the validity and perfection of the Encumbrances created by any Security Document not previously delivered pursuant to Section 10.1, including perfection by control if applicable under relevant Applicable Laws, non-contravention or breach of constating documents and Applicable Laws, the completion of all required filings and registrations with the applicable Governing Authority in respect of such Credit Documents and the obtaining of all relevant Governing Authority approvals in respect of such Credit Documents and such other customary matters as the Administrative Agent (on instructions of counsel to the Arranging Lender) may reasonably request;

 

(d) there shall not have occurred on or as of the date thereof any fact, circumstance, event, change, occurrence or effect that has, or could reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect;

 

(e) the Arranging Lender shall have received evidence that the Additional Equity has been received by the Borrower;

 

(f) if not previously delivered in connection with the advance of the Tranche Two Loan, the Administrative Agent and counsel to the Arranging Lender shall have received evidence that all insurance required to be maintained pursuant to Section 9.1(l) has been obtained and is in effect and that each Obligor is in compliance with the requirements of Section 9.1(l);

 

(g) if not previously delivered in connection with the advance of the Tranche Two Loan, the Administrative Agent and counsel to the Arranging Lender shall have received evidence that the Obligors have, subject to Schedule O, obtained all Permits necessary for the commencement of the construction and development of the Camino Rojo Project, and the Majority Lenders shall be satisfied (acting reasonably) that the Obligors will obtain all necessary Permits for the continued construction, development and operation of the Camino Rojo Project as such Permits are necessary;

 

(h) [commercially sensitive information redacted]

 

- 56 -

 

(i) if not previously delivered in connection with the advance of the Tranche Two Loan, (x) all Security Documents and related documents and instruments shall have been properly registered, recorded and filed in all places and all necessary notations have been made on the applicable shareholder registers (if not previously made and maintained), (y) lien and other necessary searches shall have been completed in all jurisdictions, and (z) deliveries of all consents, approvals, acknowledgements, undertakings, estoppels and subordination agreements contemplated herein, directions, negotiable documents of title, ownership certificates, share certificates (together with endorsements in blank) and other similar documents shall have been made and maintained, in each case, which in the opinion of the Administrative Agent’s counsel, acting at the written direction of counsel to the Arranging Lender (acting reasonably), are required to make effective the Security created or intended to be created by the Security Documents and to ensure the perfection and the intended priority of such Security;

 

(j) all fees and expenses of each Agent and the Arranging Lender due and payable prior to the date of advance of the Tranche Two Loan or Tranche Three Loan, as applicable, including, to the extent invoiced, all reasonable and documented legal fees and expenses required to be reimbursed or paid by the Borrower hereunder or under any other Credit Document, shall have been paid by the Borrower in full (or arrangement for payment thereof satisfactory to the applicable Agent shall have been made); and

 

(k) in the case of the Tranche Three Loan, the date of the advance of the Tranche Three Loan is within 6 months of the date of advance of the Tranche Two Loan.

 

10.4 Waiver

 

The terms and conditions of Sections 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 are inserted for the sole benefit of the Administrative Agent and the Lenders, and the Administrative Agent (based on the written approval and direction of the Majority Lenders) may waive any such term or condition in accordance with Section 12.13, in whole or in part, with or without terms or conditions.

 

Article 11
DEFAULT AND REMEDIES

 

11.1 Events of Default

 

Upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following events, unless expressly waived in writing in accordance with Section 12.13:

 

(a) the breach by the Borrower of Section 7.1;

 

(b) the failure of any Obligor to pay any amount due under the Credit Documents (other than amounts due pursuant to Section 7.1) within three Banking Days after payment of such amount becoming due and payable;

 

- 57 -

 

(c) the Borrower shall fail to perform or observe any covenant or condition contained in Section 9.1(d)(iv), Section 9.1(p) or Section 9.1(q) or in any provision of Section 9.2;

 

(d) if any representation or warranty made by any Obligor in any Transaction Document or in any other document, agreement or instrument delivered pursuant hereto or thereto or referred to herein or therein or any material information furnished in writing to an Agent or any Lender by any Obligor proves to have been incorrect in any material respect if such representation or warranty is not otherwise qualified by materiality and in any respect if such representation or warranty is already qualified in any way by materiality when made or furnished and, if such breach of a representation and warranty is capable of remedy, such breach continues for twenty (20) days from the earlier of (i) the Administrative Agent (acting at the written direction of the Majority Lenders) or any Lender providing written notice thereof to the Borrower, or (ii) the applicable Obligor becoming aware of the incorrect representation or warranty;

 

(e) the breach or failure of due observance or performance by any Obligor of any covenant or provision of any Transaction Document (other than those previously referred to in Section 10.2(a) through (c) inclusive) and such breach or failure continues for twenty (20) days from the earlier of (i) the Administrative Agent (acting at the written direction of the Majority Lenders) or any Lender providing written notice thereof to the Borrower, or (ii) the applicable Obligor becoming aware of such breach or failure;

 

(f) if an event of default under any one or more agreements, indentures or instruments under which (i) any Obligor has outstanding Debt in an amount of at least [commercially sensitive information redacted] in the aggregate or (ii) under which any other Person has outstanding Debt in an amount [commercially sensitive information redacted] in the aggregate which is guaranteed by any Obligor, shall occur (with all applicable grace periods having expired) and be continuing, and, as a result thereof, the repayment of any such Debt is accelerated, or is capable of being accelerated, prior to the stated maturity thereof, or if any such Debt which is payable on demand is not paid on demand;

 

(g) if an event of default occurs under any one or more Material Agreements (a “Defaulted Agreement”) and (i) in the case of the investor rights agreement between the Borrower and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited, continues for more than ten (10) Banking Days, and (ii) in the case of any other Defaulted Agreement, continues for more than thirty (30) days unless such Defaulted Agreement is replaced with an agreement within such time period (which agreement shall be promptly delivered to the Administrative Agent) (x) between the applicable Obligor and an Arm’s Length Person having substantially the same credit quality and ability to perform its obligations as the counter party to the Defaulted Agreement, and (y) providing the applicable Obligor party thereto with substantially the same commercial terms as contained in the Defaulted Agreement;

 

- 58 -

 

(h) one or more final and non-appealable judgments for payment of money in an aggregate amount in excess of [commercially sensitive information redacted] is obtained against any Obligor and such judgment or decree shall not have been and remain released, bonded, discharged, vacated, satisfied, stayed pending appeal or accepted for payment by an insurer within forty-five (45) days from the date of being entered;

 

(i) any Assets of any Obligor having an aggregate fair market value of at least [commercially sensitive information redacted] in the aggregate for all Obligors are seized or expropriated by any Governing Authority or any other Person and such seizure or expropriation continues in effect and is not released or discharged for more than forty-five (45) or such longer period during which entitlement to the use of such property continues with the applicable Obligor, and such Obligor is contesting the same in good faith and by appropriate proceedings, provided that if the property is removed from the use of such Obligor, or is sold, in the interim, such grace period shall cease to apply;

 

(j) any Transaction Document becomes or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid and unenforceable or any Obligor repudiates any Transaction Document, and such determination or repudiation is not remediated within twenty (20) days of such Obligor becoming aware of such determination or making such repudiation;

 

(k) a judgment, decree or order of a court of competent jurisdiction is entered against any Obligor, (i) adjudging it bankrupt or insolvent, or approving a petition seeking its reorganization or winding-up under any Bankruptcy Law; or (ii) appointing a receiver, trustee, liquidator, or other Person with like powers, over all, or substantially all, of the property of it; or (iii) ordering the involuntary winding up or liquidation of the affairs of it, unless, in each case, such Obligor commences forthwith to diligently and in good faith contest such proceeding and such proceeding is dismissed, stayed or discharged within forty-five (45) of the commencement thereof;

 

(l) (i) a resolution is passed for the dissolution, winding-up, reorganization, arrangement or liquidation of any Obligor, pursuant to Applicable Law; (ii) any Obligor institutes proceedings to be adjudicated bankrupt or insolvent, or consents to the institution of bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings against it under any Bankruptcy Law; (iii) any Obligor consents to the filing of any petition under any such law or to the appointment of a receiver, or other person with like powers, over all, or substantially all, of any of its property; (iv) any Obligor makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or becomes unable to pay its debts generally as they become due; or (v) any Obligor takes or consents to any action in furtherance of any of the aforesaid purposes; or

 

(m) [commercially sensitive information redacted],

 

- 59 -

 

the Administrative Agent (with the approval and instructions of the Majority Lenders) may, by notice to the Borrower, terminate the Credit Facility (provided, however, that the Credit Facility shall automatically terminate, without notice of any kind, upon the occurrence of an event described in clause (k) or (l) above) and the Administrative Agent (with the approval and instructions of the Majority Lenders) may, by the same or further notice to the Borrower, declare all indebtedness and Secured Obligations of the Borrower to the Lenders pursuant to this agreement to be immediately due and payable whereupon all such indebtedness shall immediately become and be due and payable and the Security shall become immediately enforceable, without further demand or other notice of any kind and the Collateral Agent may (with the approval and written instructions of the Majority Lenders) enforce or cause to be enforced the Security, all of which are expressly waived by the Borrower (provided, however, that all such indebtedness and Secured Obligations of the Borrower to the Lenders shall automatically become due and payable, without notice of any kind, upon the occurrence of an event described in clause (k) or (l) above).

 

For greater certainty, each of the financial measures in the events described in this Section 11.1 shall be without duplication, and the aggregate amount of any such defaults or judgments outstanding at any point shall [commercially sensitive information redacted].

 

11.2 Remedies Cumulative

 

The Borrower expressly agrees that the rights and remedies of the Agents and the Lenders under this agreement and the other Credit Documents are cumulative and in addition to and not in substitution for any rights or remedies provided by law. Any single or partial exercise by the any Agent or any Lender of any right or remedy for a default or breach of any term, covenant or condition in this agreement and the other Credit Documents does not waive, alter, affect or prejudice any other right or remedy to which such Agent or such Lender may be lawfully entitled for the same default or breach. Any waiver by the Administrative Agent with the approval of the Majority Lenders or all of the Lenders in accordance with Section 12.13 of the strict observance, performance or compliance with any term, covenant or condition of this agreement and the other Credit Documents is not a waiver of any subsequent default and any indulgence by the Lenders with respect to any failure to strictly observe, perform or comply with any term, covenant or condition of this agreement and the other Credit Documents is not a waiver of the entire term, covenant or condition or any subsequent default. No failure or delay by any Agent or any Lender in exercising any right shall operate as a waiver of such right nor shall any single or partial exercise of any power or right preclude its further exercise or the exercise of any other power or right.

 

11.3 Set-Off

 

In addition to any rights now or hereafter granted under Applicable Law, and not by way of limitation of any such rights, each Agent and each Lender is authorized, at any time that an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing without notice to the Borrower or to any other Person, any such notice being expressly waived by the Borrower, to set off, appropriate and apply any and all deposits, matured or unmatured, general or special, and any other indebtedness at any time held by or owing by such Agent or such Lender to or for the credit of or the account of the Borrower (but excluding any indebtedness or other amounts owing by the Administrative Agent or such Lender to or for the credit or of the account of the Borrower in connection with the Warrants) against and on account of the obligations and liabilities of the Borrower which are due and payable to such Agent or such Lender, as the case may be, under the Credit Documents.

 

- 60 -

 

11.4 Default Interest

 

Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any Event of Default, the principal amount of each Loan under the Credit Facility together with all accrued and unpaid interest and other unpaid amounts payable hereunder shall bear interest at the Interest Rate plus an additional 2% per annum, shall be due and paid on the earlier of (i) the date that demand is made by the Administrative Agent and (ii) the last date of each month and, to the extent unpaid, shall be compounded monthly.

 

Article 12
THE AGENTs

 

12.1 Appointment and Authorization of Agents

 

Each Finance Party hereby appoints and authorizes, and hereby agrees that it will require any assignee of any of its interests in the Credit Documents (other than the holder of a participation in its interests herein or therein) to appoint and authorize each the Agent to take such actions as agent on its behalf and to exercise such powers under the Credit Documents as are delegated to such Agent by such Finance Party by the terms hereof, together with such powers as are reasonably incidental thereto (and no individual Lender shall have any rights to take any such actions or exercise such powers so delegated). Each Agent may perform any of its duties hereunder by or through its agents or employees. Neither Agent shall, nor shall any of its directors, officers, employees or agents, be liable to any of the Finance Parties for any action taken or omitted to be taken by it or them hereunder or thereunder or in connection herewith or therewith, except for its own negligence or wilful misconduct and each Finance Party hereby acknowledges that each Agent is entering into the provisions of this Section 12.1 on its own behalf and as agent and trustee for its directors, officers, employees and agents. The provisions of this Article 12 are solely for the benefit of the Agents, and the Borrower shall not have rights as a third party beneficiary of any of such provisions. It is understood and agreed that the use of the term “agent” as used herein or in any other Credit Document (or any similar term) with reference to each Agent is not intended to connote any fiduciary or other implied (or express) obligations arising under agency doctrine of any Applicable Law. Instead, such term is used as a matter of market custom, and is intended to create or reflect only an administrative relationship between independent contracting parties. Neither Agent shall, under any circumstances, be construed to be partner or joint venture of any Lender.

 

12.2 Interest Holders

 

Each Agent may treat each Lender set forth in Schedule A or the Person designated in the last notice delivered to it under Section 13.5 as the holder of all of the interests of such Lender under the Credit Documents. Any request, authority or consent of any Lender (i) who, at the time of making such request or giving such authority or consent, is listed as a Lender in Schedule A or designated in the last notice delivered to it under Section 13.5 as the holder of all of the interests of such Lender, and (ii) relating to any matter or circumstance arising prior to the Effective Date (as defined in Schedule C) of such assignment shall, to the extent of the interests of such Lender under the Credit Documents so assigned, be conclusive and binding on any subsequent holder, assignee or transferee of the corresponding rights and interests of such Lender hereunder.

 

- 61 -

 

12.3 Consultation with Counsel

 

Each Agent may consult with legal counsel selected by it as counsel for such Agent and shall not be liable for any action taken or not taken or suffered by it in good faith and in accordance with the advice and opinion of such counsel.

 

12.4 Documents

 

Neither Agent shall be under any duty to the Finance Parties to examine, enquire into or pass upon the validity, effectiveness or genuineness of the Credit Documents or any instrument, document or communication furnished pursuant to or in connection with the Credit Documents and each Agent shall, as regards the Finance Parties, be entitled to assume that the same are valid, effective and genuine, have been signed or sent by the proper parties and are what they purport to be.

 

12.5 Responsibility of the Agents

 

The duties and obligations of each Agent to the Finance Parties under the Credit Documents are only those expressly set forth herein or as specified in the other Credit Documents. Neither Agent shall have any duty to the Finance Parties to investigate whether a Default or an Event of Default has occurred. Each Agent shall, as regards the Finance Parties, be entitled to assume that no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing unless a Responsible Officer of such Agent has actual knowledge or has been notified by the Borrower of such fact or has been notified by a Finance Party that such Finance Party considers that a Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, such notification to specify in detail the nature thereof. The duties of the Agents shall be mechanical and administrative in nature, and the Agents shall not have, by reason of this Agreement or the other Credit Documents, a fiduciary relationship in respect of any Lender.

 

12.6 Action by the Agents

 

Each Agent shall be entitled to rely, and shall be fully protected in relying, upon any note, writing, resolution, notice, statement, certificate, telex, teletype or facsimile message, electronic mail, cablegram, radiogram, order or other documentary teletransmission, telephone message, Internet or intranet website posting or other distribution believed by it to be genuine and correct and to have been signed, sent or made by the proper Person. Each Agent shall be entitled to request written instructions, or clarification of any instruction, from the Majority Lenders (or, if the relevant Credit Document stipulates the matter is a decision for any other Lender or group of Lenders, from that Lender or group of Lenders) as to whether, and in what manner, it should exercise or refrain from exercising any right, power, authority or discretion and each Agent may refrain from acting unless and until it receives those written instructions or that clarification. In the absence of written instructions, each Agent as applicable, may act (or refrain from acting) as it considers to be in the best interests of the Finance Parties. Each Agent shall be entitled to use its discretion with respect to exercising or refraining from exercising any rights which may be vested in it on behalf of the Finance Parties by and under this agreement; provided, however, that neither Agent shall exercise any rights under Section 11.1 or the Security Documents or expressed to be on behalf of or with the approval of the Majority Lenders without the request, consent or instructions of the Majority Lenders. Furthermore, any rights of an Agent expressed to be on behalf of or with the approval of the Majority Lenders shall be exercised by such Agent upon the written request or instructions of the Majority Lenders. Neither Agent shall incur any liability to the Finance Parties under or in respect of any of the Credit Documents with respect to anything which it may do or refrain from doing in the reasonable exercise of its judgment or which may seem to it to be necessary or desirable in the circumstances, except for its gross negligence or wilful misconduct as finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. Each Agent shall in all cases be fully protected in acting or refraining from acting under any of the Credit Documents in accordance with the instructions of the Majority Lenders and any action taken or failure to act pursuant to such instructions shall be binding on all Finance Parties. In respect of any notice by or action taken by either Agent hereunder, the Borrower shall at no time be obliged to enquire as to the right or authority of such Agent to so notify or act.

 

- 62 -

 

12.7 Notice of Events of Default

 

In the event that the Responsible Officer of an Agent shall acquire actual knowledge or shall have been notified of any Default or Event of Default, such Agent shall promptly notify the other Finance Parties and the Agents shall take such action and assert such rights under Section 11.1 and under the other Credit Documents as the Majority Lenders shall request in writing and the Agents shall not be subject to any liability by reason of acting pursuant to any such request. If the Majority Lenders shall fail for five Banking Days after receipt of the notice of any Default or Event of Default to request the Agents to take such action or to assert such rights under any of the Credit Documents in respect of such Default or Event of Default, each Agent may, but shall not be required to, take such action or assert such rights (other than rights under Section 11.1 or under the other Credit Documents and other than giving an express waiver of any Default or any Event of Default) as it deems in its discretion to be advisable for the protection of the Finance Parties except that, if the Majority Lenders have instructed an Agent not to take such action or assert such rights, in no event shall such Agent act contrary to such instructions unless required by law to do so.

 

12.8 Responsibility Disclaimed

 

No Agent shall be under any liability or responsibility whatsoever as agent hereunder or under any of the Credit Documents:

 

(a) to any Obligor or any other Person as a consequence of any failure or delay in the performance by, or any breach by, any Finance Party or Finance Parties of any of its or their obligations under any of the Credit Documents;

 

(b) to any Lender or Lenders as a consequence of any failure or delay in performance by, or any breach by, any Obligor of any of its obligations under any of the Credit Documents;

 

(c) as agent hereunder to any Lender or Lenders for any statements, representations or warranties in any of the Credit Documents or in any other documents contemplated hereby or thereby or in any other information provided pursuant to any of the Credit Documents or any other documents contemplated hereby or thereby or for the validity, effectiveness, enforceability or sufficiency of any of the Credit Documents or any other document contemplated hereby or thereby;

 

- 63 -

 

(d) for any failure or delay in the performance of its obligations hereunder arising out of or caused by, directly or indirectly, forces beyond its control, including, without limitation, strikes, work stoppages, accidents, acts of war or terrorism, civil or military disturbances, nuclear or natural catastrophes or acts of God, and interruptions, loss or malfunctions of utilities, communications or computer (software and hardware) services;

 

(e) to expend or risk its own funds or otherwise incur any financial liability in the performance of its duties, obligations or responsibilities or the exercise of any right, power, authority or discretion under the Credit Documents. Each Agent may refuse to perform any duty or exercise any right or power unless it receives assurances, indemnity and/or security satisfactory to it against the costs, expenses and liabilities which might be incurred by it in performing such duty or exercising such right or power;

 

(f) for any unsuitability, inadequacy, expiration or unfitness of any security interest created hereunder or pursuant to any other security documents pertaining to this matter nor shall it be obligated to make any investigation into, and shall be entitled to assume, the adequacy and fitness of any security interest created hereunder or pursuant to any other security document pertaining to this matter;

 

(g) for any error of judgment, or for any act done or step taken or omitted by it in good faith or for any mistake in act or law, or for anything which it may, in good faith, do or refrain from doing in connection herewith, in each case except for its own gross negligence or willful misconduct;

 

(h) for any indirect, special, punitive or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever, including, but not limited to, lost profits, even if such loss or damage was foreseeable or it has been advised of the likelihood of such loss or damage and regardless of the form of action;

 

(i) except with respect to its own gross negligence or willful misconduct, to any Finance Party for the due execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of, or the priority of any lien or security interest created or purported to be created under or in connection with, any security document or any other instrument or document furnished pursuant thereto;

 

(j) for any liability with respect to monitoring compliance of any other party to the Credit Documents or any other document related hereto or thereto. Neither Agent has any duty to monitor the value or rating of any collateral on an ongoing basis; or

 

(k) to segregate any money held by such Agent in trust hereunder or under any Credit Document from other funds except to the extent required by Applicable Law. Such Agent shall be under no liability for interest on any money received by it hereunder except as otherwise agreed in writing.

 

- 64 -

 

12.9 Indemnification

 

The Lenders agree to indemnify each Agent (to the extent not reimbursed by the Borrower) on a several basis only and in their respective Pro Rata Shares from and against any and all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements of any nature whatsoever which may be imposed on, incurred by or asserted against such Agent in any way relating to or arising out of any of the Credit Documents or any other document contemplated hereby or thereby or any action taken or omitted by such Agent under any of the Credit Documents or any document contemplated hereby or thereby, except that no Finance Party shall be liable to either Agent for any portion of such liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements resulting from the gross negligence (it being acknowledged that ordinary negligence does not necessarily constitute gross negligence) or wilful misconduct of such Agent as finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.

 

12.10 Credit Decision

 

Each Lender represents and warrants to the Administrative Agent that:

 

(a) in making its decision to enter into this agreement and to make its Pro Rata Share of the Credit Facility available to the Borrower, it is independently taking whatever steps it considers necessary to evaluate the financial condition and affairs of the Obligors and that it has made an independent credit judgment without reliance upon any information furnished by the Administrative Agent; and

 

(b) so long as any portion of the Credit Facility is being utilized by the Borrower, it will continue to make its own independent evaluation of the financial condition and affairs of the Obligors.

 

12.11 Successor Agent

 

Subject to the appointment and acceptance of a successor Agent, as provided below, each Agent may resign at any time by giving 30 days written notice thereof to the Borrower and the Finance Parties. Upon any such resignation, the Majority Lenders, with the prior written consent of the Borrower (which consent shall not be required (x) if the successor Agent is an Affiliate or Subsidiary of the retiring Agent on the date hereof or (y) for so long as an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing), shall have the right to appoint a successor Agent who shall be one of the Lenders unless none of the Lenders wishes to accept such appointment. If no successor Agent shall have been so appointed and shall have accepted such appointment by the time of such resignation, then the retiring Agent may, on behalf of the Finance Parties and with the prior written consent of the Borrower (which consent shall not be required for so long as an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing), petition a court of competent jurisdiction to appoint a successor Agent which shall be a recognized custodian or collateral agent or trustee organized under the laws of Canada or the United States of America which has combined capital and reserves in excess of Cdn. $50,000,000. Upon the acceptance of any appointment as Agent hereunder by a successor Agent, such successor Agent shall thereupon succeed to and become vested with all the rights, powers, privileges, duties and obligations of the retiring Agent (in its capacity as such Agent but not in its capacity as a Finance Party) and the retiring Agent shall be discharged from its duties and obligations hereunder (in its capacity as such Agent but not in its capacity as a Finance Party). After any retiring Agent’s resignation hereunder, provisions of this Article 12 shall continue in effect for its benefit in respect of any actions taken or omitted to be taken by it while it was acting as Agent.

 

- 65 -

 

12.12 Delegation by an Agent

 

Each Agent shall have the right to delegate any of its duties or obligations hereunder or under any of the Credit Documents to any of its Affiliates upon terms and conditions and subject to regulations as such Agent may think to be in the interests of the Finance Parties as a whole, and may, but is not required to, employ any agents or other assistants (including, counsel, accountants, appraisers, other experts, agencies and advisors) as it may reasonably require for the proper determination and discharge of its duties hereunder, so long as, in each case, such Agent shall not thereby be relieved of such duties or obligations and provided that such Agent will not be responsible for any negligence or misconduct on the part of any delegates, agents or other assistants or for any liability incurred by any Person as a result of not appointing such delegates, agents or other assistants if such Agent has acted honestly and in good faith and exercised that degree of care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent administrative or collateral agent would exercise in comparable circumstances.

 

12.13 Waivers and Amendments

 

(a) Subject to Sections 12.13(b) and (c), any term, covenant or condition of any of the Credit Documents may only be amended with the prior consent of the Borrower and the Majority Lenders or compliance therewith may be waived (either generally or in a particular instance and either retroactively or prospectively) by the Majority Lenders and in any such event the failure to observe, perform or discharge any such covenant, condition or obligation, so amended or waived (whether such amendment is executed or such consent or waiver is given before or after such failure), shall not be construed as a breach of such covenant, condition or obligation or as a Default or Event of Default.

 

(b) Notwithstanding Section 12.13(a), without the prior written consent of each Lender, no such amendment or waiver shall directly:

 

(i) increase either the Total Commitment Amount or the Individual Commitment of any Lender under the Credit Facility or extend the Maturity Date;

 

(ii) extend the time for the payment of interest or principal on Loans owing to any Lender, forgive any portion of principal thereof or reduce the stated rate of interest thereon;

 

(iii) amend the requirement of pro rata application of all amounts received by the Administrative Agent in respect of the Credit Facility;

 

(iv) change the percentage of the Lenders’ requirement to constitute the Majority Lenders or otherwise amend the definition of Majority Lenders, Finance Parties, Exposure, Secured Obligations, Secured Obligations Termination Date or any definition forming part thereof;

 

- 66 -

 

(v) reduce the stated amount or postpone the date for payment of any fees or other amount to be paid to any Lender pursuant to Article 5;

 

(vi) permit any subordination of the Secured Obligations;

 

(vii) release or discharge (or amend in a manner which would have that effect) the Security Documents, in whole or in part (other than a release or discharge of Security pursuant to Section 12.24); or

 

(viii) alter the terms of this Section 12.13, Section 12.15 or Section 12.16.

 

(c) No amendment to or waiver of any provision hereof to the extent it affects the rights or obligations of an Agent shall be effective without its prior written consent.

 

(d) Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, no Defaulting Lender shall have any right to approve or disapprove any amendment, waiver or consent hereunder, except that (i) the Individual Commitment of such Defaulting Lender under the Credit Facility may not be increased or extended, (ii) the principal amount of any Loan extended by such Defaulting Lender may not be decreased, (iii) any interest or fees payable to such Defaulting Lender may not be reduced and, (iv) the payment of any principal, interest or fees owing to such Defaulting Lender may not be postponed, in each case without the consent of such Defaulting Lender.

 

12.14 Determination by an Agent Conclusive and Binding

 

Any determination to be made by an Agent on behalf of or with the approval of the Lenders or the Majority Lenders under this agreement or any other Credit Document shall be made by such Agent in good faith and, if so made, shall be binding on all parties, absent manifest error.

 

12.15 Adjustments among Lenders after Acceleration

 

(a) The Lenders agree that, at any time after all indebtedness of the Borrower to the Lenders pursuant hereto has become immediately due and payable pursuant to Section 11.1 or after the cancellation or termination of the Credit Facility, they will at any time or from time to time upon the request of any Lender through the Administrative Agent purchase portions of the availments made available by the other Lenders which remain outstanding, and make any other adjustments which may be necessary or appropriate, in order that the amounts of the availments made available by the respective Lenders which remain outstanding, as adjusted pursuant to this Section 12.15, will be in the same proportions as their respective Pro Rata Shares thereof with respect to the Credit Facility immediately prior to such acceleration, cancellation or termination.

 

- 67 -

 

(b) The Lenders agree that, at any time after all indebtedness of the Borrower to the Lenders pursuant hereto has become immediately due and payable pursuant to Section 11.1 or after the cancellation or termination of the Credit Facility, the amount of any repayment made by the Borrower under this agreement, and the amount of any Proceeds of Realization, which are to be applied against amounts owing hereunder as principal, will be so applied in a manner such that to the extent possible, the availments made available by the respective Lenders which remain outstanding, after giving effect to such application, will be in the same proportions as their respective Pro Rata Shares thereof with respect to the Credit Facility immediately prior to such acceleration, cancellation or termination.

 

(c) For greater certainty, the Lenders acknowledge and agree that without limiting the generality of the provisions of Section 12.15(a) and (b), such provisions will have application if and whenever any Lender shall obtain any payment (whether voluntary, involuntary, through the exercise of any right of set-off, compensation, or otherwise) on account of any monies owing or payable by the Borrower to it under the Credit Documents in excess of its Pro Rata Share of payments on account of monies owing by the Borrower to all the Lenders thereunder.

 

(d) The Borrower agrees to be bound by and to do all things necessary or appropriate to give effect to any and all purchases and other adjustments made by and between the Lenders pursuant to this Section 12.15, provided that Borrower shall have no additional financial obligations in connection therewith.

 

12.16 Redistribution of Payment

 

If a Lender shall receive payment of a portion of the aggregate amount of principal and interest due to it hereunder which is greater than the proportion received by any other Lender in respect of the aggregate amount of principal and interest due in respect of the Credit Facility (having regard to the respective Individual Commitments of the Lenders for the Credit Facility), the Lender receiving such proportionately greater payment shall purchase a participation (which shall be deemed to have been done simultaneously with receipt of such payment) in that portion of the aggregate outstanding credit of the other Lender or Lenders so that the respective receipts shall be pro rata to their respective participation in the credits; provided, however, that if all or part of such proportionately greater payment received by such purchasing Lender shall be recovered from the Borrower, such purchase shall be rescinded and the purchase price paid for such participation shall be returned by such selling Lender or Lenders to the extent of such recovery, but without interest.

 

12.17 Distribution of Notices

 

Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, promptly after receipt by an Agent of any notice or other document which is delivered to the such hereunder on behalf of the Majority Lenders, such Agent shall provide a copy of such notice or other document to each of the Finance Parties.

 

12.18 Decision to Enforce Security

 

Upon the Security becoming enforceable in accordance with its terms, the Collateral Agent shall promptly so notify each of the Finance Parties. Any Lender may thereafter provide the Collateral Agent with a written request to enforce the Security. Forthwith after the receipt of such a request, the Collateral Agent shall seek the instructions of the Majority Lenders as to whether the Security should be enforced and the manner in which the Security should be enforced. In seeking such instructions, the Collateral Agent shall submit a specific proposal to the Finance Parties. The Collateral Agent shall promptly notify the Finance Parties of all instructions and approvals of the Majority Lenders.

 

- 68 -

 

12.19 Enforcement

 

The Collateral Agent reserves the sole right to enforce, or otherwise deal with, the Security and to deal with the Obligors in connection therewith; provided, however, that the Collateral Agent shall so enforce, or otherwise deal with, the Security as the Majority Lenders shall instruct.

 

12.20 Determination of Exposures

 

Concurrent with any request for any approval or instructions of the Majority Lenders and prior to any distribution of Proceeds of Realization to any of the Finance Parties, the Administrative Agent shall request each of the Finance Parties to provide to the Administrative Agent a written calculation of such Finance Party’s Exposure as at the applicable date, each such calculation to be certified true and correct by the Finance Party providing same. Such calculation shall be in such detail as may be reasonably requested by the Administrative Agent. Each of the Finance Parties shall so provide such calculation within two Banking Days following the request of the Administrative Agent. Any such calculation provided by a particular Finance Party shall, absent manifest error, constitute prima facie evidence of such Finance Party’s Exposure at such time. With respect to each determination of the Exposure of the Finance Parties, the Administrative Agent shall promptly notify the Finance Parties. The Exposure of a Lender under any Credit Documents shall be the aggregate amount owing to such Lender thereunder on the applicable date.

 

12.21 Application of Cash Proceeds

 

(a) All Proceeds of Realization which are not Cash Proceeds shall be forthwith delivered to the Administrative Agent and disposed of, or realized upon, by the Administrative Agent in such manner as the Majority Lenders may approve so as to produce Cash Proceeds.

 

(b) Subject to the claims, if any, of secured creditors of the Borrower (except the claims of any Finance Party) whose security ranks in priority to the Security, all Cash Proceeds shall be applied and distributed, and the claims of the Finance Parties shall be deemed to have the relative priorities which would result in the Cash Proceeds being applied and distributed, as follows:

 

(i) first, to the payment of all reasonable and documented costs and expenses incurred by each Agent (including, without limitation, all reasonable and documented legal fees and disbursements) in the exercise of all or any of the powers granted to it hereunder or under the other Credit Documents and in payment of all of the remuneration of any Receiver and all reasonable and documented costs and expenses properly incurred by such Receiver (including, without limitation, all reasonable and documented legal fees and disbursements) in the exercise of all or any powers granted to it under the Security Documents;

 

- 69 -

 

(ii) second, in payment of all amounts of money borrowed or advanced by the Collateral Agent or any Receiver pursuant to the Security Documents and any interest thereon;

 

(iii) third, to the payment of the Secured Obligations of the Borrower to the Finance Parties pro rata in accordance with their relative Exposures; and

 

(iv) finally, the balance, if any, to the Borrower or otherwise in accordance with Applicable Law.

 

12.22 Entering into Contracts

 

Each Agent may enter into any Credit Document other than this agreement and any amendment or waiver of this agreement as agent for and on behalf of the Finance Parties.

 

12.23 Other Security Not Permitted

 

None of the Finance Parties shall be entitled to enjoy any Encumbrance with respect to any of the Secured Assets to secure the Secured Obligations other than the Security.

 

12.24 Discharge of Security

 

(a) To the extent a sale or other disposition of the Secured Assets is permitted pursuant to the provisions hereof, the Lenders hereby authorize the Collateral Agent, at the cost and expense of the Borrower, to execute such discharges and other instruments which are necessary for the purposes of releasing and discharging the Security therein or for the purposes of recording the provisions or effect thereof in any office where any Security Document may be registered or recorded or for the purpose of more fully and effectively carrying out the provisions of this Section 12.24.

 

(b) On the Secured Obligations Termination Date, the Lenders hereby authorize the Collateral Agent (or, in the Collateral Agent’s reasonable discretion, the Borrower or its counsel), at the expense and request of the Borrower, to execute such agreements and other instruments as may be necessary to release and discharge the Security or record the effects of such release or discharge in any office where the Security Documents may be registered or recorded.

 

12.25 Survival

 

The provisions of this Article 12 and all other provisions of this agreement which are necessary to give effect to each of the provisions of this Article 12 shall survive the permanent repayment in full of the Credit Facility and the termination of all of the commitments of the Lenders in connection therewith until the Secured Obligations Termination Date.

 

- 70 -

 

Article 13
MISCELLANEOUS

 

13.1 Notices

 

All notices and other communications provided for herein shall be in writing and shall be (a) personally delivered to an officer or other responsible employee of the addressee; or (b) sent by electronic communication (including email and Internet or intranet websites), at or to the applicable addresses or email addresses, as the case may be, to the extent set out opposite the parties name on the signature page hereof or at or to such address or addresses or email address or addresses as any party hereto may from time to time designate to the Borrower and Administrative Agent.

 

Any notice or other communication which is personally delivered as aforesaid shall be deemed to have been validly and effectively given on the date of such delivery if such date is a Banking Day and such delivery was received before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time); otherwise, it shall be deemed to have been validly and effectively given on the Banking Day next following such date of delivery. Any notice or communication which is sent by electronic communication shall be deemed to have been validly and effectively given on the date of transmission if such date is a Banking Day and such transmission was received before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto Time); otherwise, it shall be deemed to have been validly and effectively given on the Banking Day next following such date of transmission.

 

Any notices or communications posted to an Internet or intranet website shall be deemed received upon the deemed receipt by the intended recipient at its email address as described in the foregoing paragraph of notification that such notice or communication is available and identifying the website address therefor.

 

13.2 Severability

 

Any provision of this agreement which is prohibited or unenforceable shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof.

 

13.3 Counterparts

 

This agreement may be executed and delivered in one or more original or electronic mail transmission in PDF format counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.

 

13.4 Successors and Assigns

 

This agreement shall enure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

 

13.5 Assignment

 

(a) Neither the Credit Documents nor the benefit thereof may, without the consent of each Lender, be assigned by the Borrower.

 

- 71 -

 

(b) Notwithstanding any provision in any Credit Document or in the Warrants, no Lender shall be entitled to sell, transfer, assign, grant a participation in, or otherwise dispose of, all or any portion of its rights and obligations under the Credit Documents or in any Warrants issued or to be issued to such Lender, in each case until such time as such Lender has advanced the full amount of its Individual Commitment.

 

(c) Subject to Section 13.5(b), with the prior written consent of (i) the Borrower (provided that such consent is not required in circumstances where an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing) and (ii) the Administrative Agent, a Lender may at any time sell all or any part of its rights and obligations under the Credit Documents to one or more Persons (“Purchasing Lenders”), provided that such consent of the Borrower is not required if such sale is to one or more other Lenders, to an Affiliate of any Lender or to any fund managed by such Lender, and such assignment would not impose at the time of the assignment on the Borrower any indemnity contained in this agreement. Upon such sale, the Lender shall, to the extent of such sale, be released from its obligations under the Credit Documents arising thereafter and each of the Purchasing Lenders shall become a party to the Credit Documents to the extent of the interest so purchased; provided, however, no Lender that is a Defaulting Lender shall be released from any obligation in respect of damages arising in connection with it being or becoming a Defaulting Lender. Any such assignment by a Lender shall not be effective unless and until such Lender and the Purchasing Lender has executed an instrument substantially in the form of Schedule C whereby the Purchasing Lender has agreed to be bound by the terms of the Credit Documents as a Lender and has agreed to a specific Individual Commitment with respect to the Credit Facility and a specific address and email address for the purpose of notices as provided in Section 13.1, unless and until the requisite consents to such assignment have been obtained and unless and until a copy of a fully executed copy of such instrument has been delivered to the Administrative Agent and the Borrower. Upon any such assignment becoming effective, Schedule A shall be deemed to be amended to include the Purchasing Lender as a Lender with the specific Individual Commitment with respect to the Credit Facility, address and email address as aforesaid and the Individual Commitment of the Lender with respect to the Credit Facility making such assignment shall be deemed to be reduced by the amount of the Individual Commitments of the Purchasing Lender with respect to the Credit Facility.

 

(d) The Borrower authorizes the Administrative Agent and the Lenders to disclose to any Purchasing Lender and any prospective Purchasing Lender and authorizes each of the Lenders to disclose to any other Lender any and all financial information in their possession concerning the Obligors and their Subsidiaries which has been delivered to them by or on behalf of the Borrower pursuant to this agreement or which has been delivered to them by or on behalf of the Borrower in connection with their credit evaluation of the Obligors and their Subsidiaries prior to becoming a party to this agreement, so long as any such Purchasing Lender (other than an Affiliate of the assigning Lender or a fund managed by such assigning Lender), in the case of any assignment by a Lender that is subject to a confidentiality agreement with the Borrower at such time, agrees in writing pursuant to a confidentiality agreement on terms approved by the Borrower not to disclose any confidential, non-public information to any Person other than, on a need to know basis, to its non-brokerage affiliates, employees, accountants or legal counsel on a confidential basis, unless required by Applicable Law.

 

- 72 -

 

(e) In connection with all assignments, payment of a registration and processing fee of $3,500 shall be made by the assigning Lender to the Administrative Agent (which fee may be waived or reduced in the sole discretion of Administrative Agent). No such registration and processing fee shall be payable in the case of an assignee which is already a Lender.

 

13.6 Entire Agreement

 

This agreement and the agreements referred to herein and delivered pursuant hereto constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto and supersede any prior agreements, undertakings, declarations, representations and understandings, both written and verbal, in respect of the subject matter hereof.

 

13.7 Further Assurances

 

The Borrower shall, from time to time and at all times hereafter, upon every reasonable request of an Agent, make, do, execute, and deliver, or cause to be made, done, executed and delivered, all such further acts, deeds, assurances and things as may be necessary in the opinion of such Agent, acting reasonably, for more effectually implementing and carrying out the true intent and meaning of the Credit Documents or any agreement delivered pursuant hereto and thereto.

 

13.8 Judgment Currency

 

(a) If, for the purpose of obtaining or enforcing judgment against the Borrower in any court in any jurisdiction, it becomes necessary to convert into a particular currency (such currency being hereinafter in this Section 13.8 referred to as the “Judgment Currency”) an amount due in another currency (such other currency being hereinafter in this Section 13.8 referred to as the “Indebtedness Currency”) under this agreement, the conversion shall be made at the rate of exchange prevailing on the Banking Day immediately preceding:

 

(i) the date of actual payment of the amount due, in the case of any proceeding in the courts of the Province of Ontario or in the courts of any other jurisdiction that will give effect to such conversion being made on such date; or

 

(ii) the date on which the judgment is given, in the case of any proceeding in the courts of any other jurisdiction (the date as of which such conversion is made pursuant to this Section 13.8(a)(ii) being hereinafter in this Section 13.8 referred to as the “Judgment Conversion Date”).

 

- 73 -

 

(b) If, in the case of any proceeding in the court of any jurisdiction referred to in Section 13.8(a)(ii), there is a change in the rate of exchange prevailing between the Judgment Conversion Date and the date of actual payment of the amount due, the Borrower shall pay to the appropriate judgment creditor or creditors such additional amount (if any, but in any event not a lesser amount) as may be necessary to ensure that the amount paid in the Judgment Currency, when converted at the rate of exchange prevailing on the date of payment, will produce the amount of the Indebtedness Currency which could have been purchased with the amount of Judgment Currency stipulated in the judgment or judicial order at the rate of exchange prevailing on the Judgment Conversion Date.

 

(c) Any amount due from the Borrower under the provisions of Section 13.8(b) shall be due to the appropriate judgment creditor or creditors as a separate debt and shall not be affected by judgment being obtained for any other amounts due under or in respect of this agreement.

 

(d) The term “rate of exchange” in this Section 13.8 means the 4:30 p.m. rate of exchange for Canadian interbank transactions applied in converting the Indebtedness Currency into the Judgment Currency published by the Bank of Canada for the day prior to the day in question.

 

13.9 Anti-Money Laundering Legislation

 

(a) The Borrower acknowledges that, pursuant to the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (Canada) and other applicable anti-money laundering, anti-terrorist financing, government sanction and “know your client” applicable laws, whether within Canada or elsewhere (collectively, including any guidelines or orders thereunder, “AML Legislation”), the Lenders and the Agents may be required to obtain, verify and record information regarding the Borrower and its Subsidiaries and their directors, authorized signing officers, direct or indirect shareholders or unitholders or other Persons in control of the Borrower and/or any such Subsidiary, and the transactions contemplated hereby. The Borrower shall promptly.

 

(i) provide all such information, including supporting documentation and other evidence, as may be reasonably requested by any Lender or an Agent, or any prospective assignee of a Lender or Agent, in order to comply with any applicable AML Legislation, whether now or hereafter in existence; and

 

(ii) if requested from time to time, notify the recipient of any such information of any changes thereto.

 

(b) If, upon the written request of any Lender, the Administrative Agent has ascertained the identity of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or any authorized signatories of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries for the purposes of applicable AML Legislation on such Lender’s behalf, then the Administrative Agent:

 

(i) shall be deemed to have done so as an agent for such Lender, and this agreement shall constitute a “written agreement” in such regard between such Lender and the Administrative Agent within the meaning of applicable AML Legislation; and

 

- 74 -

 

(ii) shall provide to such Lender copies of all information obtained in such regard without any representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, each of the Lenders agrees that the Administrative Agent has no obligation to ascertain the identity of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or any authorized signatories of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, on behalf of any Lender, or to confirm the completeness or accuracy of any information it obtains from the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or any such authorized signatory in doing so.

 

13.10 No Fiduciary Duty

 

Each Lender and its Affiliates (collectively, solely for purposes of this Section 13.10, the “Lending Parties”), may have economic interests that conflict with those of the Borrower, its shareholders and/or their Affiliates. The Borrower acknowledges and agrees that (i) the transactions contemplated by the Credit Documents (including the exercise of rights and remedies hereunder and thereunder) (the “Credit Document Transactions”) are arm’s-length commercial transactions between the Lenders, on the one hand, and the Borrower, on the other, and (ii) in connection with the Credit Document Transactions and with the process leading thereto, (x) no Lending Party has assumed an advisory or fiduciary responsibility in favour of the Borrower, its shareholders or its Affiliates with respect to the Credit Document Transactions or the process leading thereto (irrespective of whether any Lending Party has advised, is currently advising or will advise the Borrower, its shareholders or its Affiliates on other matters) or any other obligation to the Borrower except the obligations expressly set forth in the Credit Documents and (y) each Lender is acting solely as principal and not as the agent or fiduciary of the Borrower, its management, shareholders, creditors or any other Person in respect of the Credit Document Transactions except as otherwise expressly set forth in the Credit Documents. The Borrower acknowledges and agrees that it has consulted its own legal and financial advisors to the extent it deemed appropriate and that it is responsible for making its own independent judgment with respect to the Credit Document Transactions and the process leading thereto. The Borrower agrees that it will not claim that any Lending Party has rendered advisory services of any nature or respect, or owes a fiduciary or similar duty to the Borrower, in connection with the Credit Document Transactions or the process leading thereto except as otherwise expressly set forth in the Credit Documents.

 

- 75 -

 

13.11 Treatment of Certain Information: Confidentiality

 

(a) Each of the Agents and the Lenders agrees to maintain the confidentiality of the Information (as defined below), except that each of the Agents and the Lenders may disclose the Information (i) to its Affiliates and its Affiliates’ respective directors, officers, employees, agents, advisors and representatives in connection with the administration of this agreement and the preservation, exercise, or enforcement of the rights of the Lenders under this agreement (it being understood that the Persons to whom such disclosure is made will be informed of the confidential nature of such Information and instructed to keep such Information confidential), (ii) to the extent requested by any Governing Authority purporting to have jurisdiction over it and legally entitled to compel production of such Information (provided that, unless specifically prohibited by Applicable Laws, court order or similar legal process, each Agent and each Lender shall use reasonable efforts to notify the Borrower of any request by any Governmental Authority or representative thereof (other than any such request in connection with an examination of an Agent or a Lender by such Governmental Authority) for disclosure of any such Information prior to disclosure of such Information), (iii) to the extent required by Applicable Laws or by any court order or similar legal process (provided that, unless specifically prohibited by Applicable Laws, court order or similar legal process, each Agent and each Lender shall use reasonable efforts to notify the Borrower of any request by any Governmental Authority or representative thereof (other than any such request in connection with an examination of an Agent or a Lender by such Governmental Authority) for disclosure of any such Information prior to disclosure of such Information), (iv), in connection with the exercise of any remedies hereunder or under any other Credit Document or any action or proceeding relating to this agreement or any other Credit Document or the enforcement of rights hereunder or thereunder, (v) subject to an agreement containing provisions substantially the same as those of this Section 13.11, to any permitted assignee of, or any prospective permitted assignee of, any of its rights or obligations under this agreement, (vi) with the consent of the Borrower, (vii) to the extent such Information (x) becomes publicly available other than as a result of a breach of this Section 13.11 or (y) becomes available to an Agent or any Lender on a non-confidential basis from a source other than an Obligor. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 13.11(a)(ii) and (iii), neither of the Agents nor any Lenders shall have any liability whatsoever for any failure to provide notice as referred to therein.

 

(b) For purposes of this Section 13.11, “Information” means all information received in connection with this agreement and/or any Obligor or its Subsidiaries or their respective businesses from any Obligor, other than any such information that (i) is available to an Agent or any Lender on a non-confidential basis prior to such receipt or (ii) has become publicly available other than as a result of a breach of this Section 13.11.

 

(c) In addition and for greater certainty, any Lenders named therein shall have the right to approve any press releases or presentations prepared by any Obligor in connection with the Credit Facility.

 

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed and delivered this agreement on the date first written above.

 

 

Address: ORLA MINING LTD. 
     
Orla Mining Ltd.    
Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street Per: (Signed) “Etienne Morin” 
Vancouver, BC   Name: Etienne Morin 
Canada V6C 2T5   Title: Chief Financial Officer
     
     
Attention            Etienne Morin, Chief    
Financial Officer    
Telephone: [personal information redacted]    
Email: [personal information redacted]    
  Per:  
    Name:  
    Title:   

  

 

 

 

           GLAS USA LLC, as Administrative Agent
     
     
   Per: (Signed) “Yana Kislenko”
     Name: Yana Kislenko
      Title: Vice President
   

 

           GLAS AMERICAS LLC, as Collateral Agent
   
   
   Per: (Signed) “Yana Kislenko”
     Name: Yana Kislenko
      Title: Vice President

 

 

 

  

  TRINITY CAPITAL PARTNERS CORPORATION,
as Arranging Lender and Lender
   
   
        Per: (Signed) “John Graham”
    Name: John Graham
    Title: Partner
   
   
  Per:  
    Name:
    Title:

 

[Remaining signature pages of each of the Lenders redacted for confidentiality reasons]

 

 

 

 

Schedule A
Lenders and Individual Commitments

 

[Schedule redacted for confidentiality reasons]

 

 

 

  

Schedule B
Compliance Certificate

 

TO:

GLAS USA LLC, as Administrative Agent

 

Attention:            Administrator – ORLA MINING

Email: [personal information redacted]

 

I, _______________, the ________________ of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Borrower”), in such capacity as _________________, without personal liability, and not in my personal capacity, hereby certify that:

 

1. I am the duly appointed _________________ of the Borrower, the borrower named in the loan agreement made as of December 18, 2019 between, inter alios, the Borrower, the Lenders named therein, and GLAS USA LLC, as administrative agent (as amended, amended and restated, modified, supplemented or replaced from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”) and as such I am providing this certificate for and on behalf of the Borrower pursuant to the Loan Agreement.

 

2. I am familiar with and have examined the provisions of the Loan Agreement including, without limitation, those of Article 8, Article 9 and Article 11 therein.

 

3. To the best of my knowledge, information and belief and after due inquiry, no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing as at the date hereof. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Borrower acknowledges and confirms that it is in compliance with Section 9.1(t) of the Loan Agreement concerning Registrations required to be created, maintained, recorded, registered, filed and perfected with respect to the Security in accordance with the provisions of the Credit Documents.

 

4. All representations and warranties contained in Article 8 are true and correct in all respects on the date hereof as if such representations and warranties were made on such date (other than such representations and warranties which relate to an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties are true and correct as of such earlier date).

 

5. Unless the context otherwise requires, capitalized terms in the Loan Agreement which appear herein without definitions shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Loan Agreement.

 

DATED this ___________ day of __________, 20___.

 

  ORLA MINING LTD.
   
   
  Per:  
    Name:
    Title:

 

 

 

  

Schedule C
Form of Assignment

 

DATED __________, 20___

 

Reference is made to the loan agreement, dated as of December 18, 2019 (as such agreement may be amended, supplemented, amended and restated, novated or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”) between, inter alia, Orla Mining Ltd., as borrower, the Lenders named therein and GLAS USA LLC as administrative agent of the Lenders. Terms defined in the Loan Agreement are used herein as therein defined.

 

_________________ (the “Assignor”) and _________________ (the “Assignee”) agree as follows:

 

(a) The Assignor hereby sells and assigns to the Assignee, and the Assignee hereby purchases and assumes from the Assignor, a ______% interest in and to all of the Assignor’s rights and obligations under the Loan Agreement as of the Effective Date (as defined below) (including, without limitation, such percentage interest in the Assignor’s Individual Commitment as in effect on the Effective Date, the credit extended by the Assignor under the Credit Facility and outstanding on the Effective Date and the corresponding rights and obligations of the Assignor under all of the Credit Documents).

 

(b) The Assignor (i) represents and warrants that as of the date hereof its Individual Commitment is $___________ (without giving effect to assignments thereof which have not yet become effective, including, but not limited to, the assignment contemplated hereby), and the aggregate outstanding amount of credit extended by it under the Credit Facility is $___________ (without giving effect to assignments thereof which have not yet become effective, including, but not limited to, the assignment contemplated hereby); (ii) represents and warrants that it is the legal and beneficial owner of the interest being assigned by it hereunder and that such interest is free and clear of any adverse claim; (iii) makes no representation or warranty and assumes no responsibility with respect to any statements, warranties or representations made in or in connection with the Credit Documents or the execution, legality, validity, enforceability, genuineness, sufficiency or value of the Credit Documents or any other instrument or document furnished pursuant thereto; (iv) makes no representation or warranty and assumes no responsibility with respect to the financial condition of any Obligor and its Subsidiaries or the performance or observance by any Obligor of any of its obligations under the Credit Documents or any other instrument or document furnished pursuant thereto; and (v) gives notice to the Administrative Agent and the Borrower of the assignment to the Assignee hereunder.

 

(c) The effective date of this Assignment (the “Effective Date”) shall be the later of ___________ and the date on which a copy of a fully executed copy of this Assignment has been delivered to the Borrower and the Administrative Agent in accordance with Section 13.5(b) of the Loan Agreement.

 

(d) The Assignee hereby agrees to (i) the specific Individual Commitment of $___________ with respect to the Credit Facility; (ii) be bound by the terms of the Credit Documents as a Lender; and (iii) the address and email address set out after its name on the signature page hereof for the purpose of notices as provided in Section 13.1 of the Loan Agreement.

 

 

 

 

(e) As of the Effective Date (i) the Assignee shall, in addition to any rights and obligations under the Credit Documents held by it immediately prior to the Effective Date, have the rights and obligations under the Credit Documents that have been assigned to it pursuant to this Assignment, and (ii) the Assignor shall, to the extent provided in this Assignment, relinquish its rights and be released from its obligations under the Credit Documents.

 

(f) The Assignor and Assignee shall make all appropriate adjustments in payments under the Credit Documents for periods prior to the Effective Date directly between themselves.

 

(g) This Assignment and Acceptance shall be delivered to the Administrative Agent with a processing and recordation fee of $3,500. [NTD: To be included if fee has not been waived by the Administrative Agent.]

 

(h) If the Assignee is not a Lender, annexed hereto as Exhibit A is a completed administrative questionnaire, providing such information (including, without limitation, credit contact information and wiring instructions) of the Assignee.

 

(i) From and after the Effective Date, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments in respect of the assigned interest (including payments of principal, interest, fees and other amounts) to the Assignor for amounts which have accrued to but excluding the Effective Date, and to the Assignee for amounts which have accrued from and after the Effective Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrative Agent shall make all payments of interest, fees or other amounts paid or payable in kind from and after the Effective Date to the Assignee.

 

This Assignment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein.

 

       [ASSIGNOR]
     
     
  Per:  
    Name:
    Title:

 

       [ASSIGNEE]
     
     
  Per:  
    Name:

 

C-1

 

 

    Title:
     
     
  Address  
   
   
   
  Attention:  
  Email:  
     

 

C-2

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGED and agreed to as of this ___________ day of ___________ , 20______.

 

 

  GLAS USA LLC, as Administrative Agent
   
   
  Per:   
    Name:
    Title:

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGED and agreed to as of this _________ day of _____________, 20_____.1

 

 

  ORLA MINING LTD.
   
   
  Per:   
    Name:
    Title:  Authorized Signatory

 

 

Per:   
    Name:
    Title:  Authorized Signatory

 

 

 

1  Not required if (i) an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, or (ii) (x) if assignment is to a Lender, an Affiliate of a Lender, or to any fund managed by such Lender, and (y) such assignment would not impose at the time of the assignment on the Borrower any indemnity contained in the Loan Agreement.

C-3

 

Exhibit A
ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTIONNAIRE

 

See attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LSTA/LMA Standard Administrative Details Form

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Loan Market Association ("LMA") and Loan Syndications & Trading Association ("LSTA") consent to the use and reproduction of this document for the preparation and documentation of agreements relating to transactions or potential transactions in the loan markets.

 

© Loan Market Association, Loan Syndications & Trading Association. All rights reserved.

 

C-A-1

 

 

LSTA/LMA Standard Administrative Details Form

  

ENTITY DETAILS
Name [Name] MEI Markit Entity ID
GIIN FATCA Global Intermediary Identification Number (Optional) CRN UK Company Registration Number (Optional) LEI Legal Entity ID (Optional)
Entity Type Type of lender. If lender/entity type does not appear in list, you may provide your own value.

Address (of Lending Office):

Registered address of lending office, including country of domicile.

Signature Block:

Signature Block as it would appear on settlement documentation. E.g. (for separately managed account):
ABC Fund
by 123 Asset Management as Advisor

Fund Manager Name of fund/asset manager, as would be referenced in the sig. block. MEI Markit Entity ID
Lender Parent Name of legal parent if different from lender entity. (Optional) MEI Markit Entity ID

  

NOTICE/SERVICING MESSAGE DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS
Firm Name of Company Fax Fax Number Email Email Address Email Pfd.
Firm Name of Company Fax Fax Number Email Email Address Email Pfd.

 

STANDARD SETTLEMENT INSTRUCTIONS / WIRING INSTRUCTIONS
Currency Applicable Currency.
Account With Institution Name of Beneficiary’s Bank (usually custodian/trustee)
SWIFT BIC 8/11-Character BIC of Beneficiary’s Bank ABA # Routing # or UK Sort Code of Beneficiary’s Bank (optional)
Beneficiary Customer Name of Ultimate Beneficiary (Lender)
Beneficiary Account # Account # of Ult. Beneficiary IBAN IBAN of Ultimate Beneficiary (opt)
Payment Reference
(Remittance Info)

Use Standard Wire Reference Format*:

[Borrower Name]
[Facility Name/Abbr.] [Facility/Deal CUSIP/ISIN]
[Payment Purpose(s)] [Transaction Reference ID]

Special Instructions  
Template above can be used for wire instructions where receiving bank is custodian/trustee, and lender has dedicated account. Additional templates provided at Appendix A.

 

SERVICE PROVIDERS & THIRD-PARTY DATA ACCESS
  Doc. Delivery Recon & Inventory
Role Custodian/Trustee Name Name of Company MEI Markit Entity ID
Role Relationship to lender. Name Name of Company MEI Markit entity ID

 

C-A-2

 

  

CREDIT CONTACTS (LEGAL DOCUMENTATION, AMENDMENTS & WAIVERS)
Name Name of group or individual. Select group or Individual Firm Firm with which contact is affiliated.
Address: Registered address of contact’s office (if different than the lender’s office), including country of domicile.
Phone   Fax   Email  
☐ Data Room Access Pfd. Contact Method Preferred contact method for inquiries.
Copy and paste section above to add any additional contacts. It is recommended that at least one of the contacts be a group.
               

 

OPERATIONS CONTACTS (INQUIRIES ONLY)
Name Name of group or individual. Select group or Individual Firm Firm with which contact is affiliated.
Address: Registered address of contact’s office (if different than the lender’s office), including country of domicile.
Phone   Fax   Email  
☐ Settlements ☐ Servicing ☐ SSI Verification ☐ KYC Pfd. Contact Method Preferred contact method for inquiries.
Copy and paste section above to add any additional contacts. It is recommended that at least one of the contacts be a group.
               

 

LETTER OF CREDIT CONTACTS
Name Name of group or individual. Select group or Individual Firm Firm with which contact is affiliated.
Address: Registered address of contact’s office (if different than the lender’s office), including country of domicile.
Phone   Fax   Email  
☐ Settlements ☐ Servicing ☐ SSI Verification ☐ KYC Pfd. Contact Method Preferred contact method for inquiries.
Copy and paste section above to add any additional contacts. It is recommended that at least one of the contacts be a group.
               

 

ADDITIONAL ENTITY DETAILS & KYC/FATCA INFORMATION
Country of Incorporation Country of Incorporation of lender Country of Tax Residence Country of Residence of lender for tax purposes
EIN US Employee ID Number UK Treaty Passport # UK Treaty Passport #
US Tax Form Type of tax form used/attached UK Treaty Passport Export Date UK Treaty Passport Expiry Date
Entity Referenced As Primary Entity

 

C-A-3

 

 

Appendix A: Additional Wire Instruction Templates:

  

Template below can be used for wire instructions where recipient is intermediary bank with nostro account for custodian and the Lender does not have a dedicated account.

 

Currency Applicable Currency.
Correspondent Bank Name of Receiver’s Correspondent Bank (SWIFT 54a)
SWIFT BIC 8/11-Character SWIFT BIC of Correspondent Bank
Intermediary Bank Name of Intermediary Bank (SWIFT 56a)
SWIFT BIC 8/11-Character BIC of Intermediary Bank ABA # ABA/Routing # or UK Sort Code of Intermediary Bank (optional)
Account With Institution Name of Beneficiary’s Bank – usually custodian (SWIFT 57a)
SWIFT BIC 8/11-Character SWIFT BIC of Beneficiary’s Bank IBAN IBAN of Beneficiary’s Bank at Intermediary
Beneficiary Customer Name of Ultimate Beneficiary (Lender) (SWIFT 59a)
Beneficiary Account # Account #/Code of Ult. Beneficiary
Payment Reference
(Remittance Info)

Use Standard Wire Reference Format*:

[Borrower Name]
[Facility Name/Abbr.] [Facility/Deal CUSIP/ISIN]
[Payment Purpose(s)] [Transaction Reference ID]

Special Instructions  

 

C-A-4

 

 

Schedule D
Form of Drawdown Notice

 

TO:

GLAS USA LLC AND GLAS AMERICAS LLC
3 Second Street, Suite 206
Jersey City, NJ 07311
Fax: [personal information redacted],

 

Attention: Administrator – ORLA MINING
Telefax: [personal information redacted],
Email: [personal information redacted],

   
RE: Loan Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2019 (as such agreement may be amended, supplemented, amended and restated, novated or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”) between, inter alia, Orla Mining Ltd., as borrower, the Lenders named therein and GLAS USA LLC, as administrative agent of the Lenders

 

Pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, the undersigned hereby irrevocably notifies you that it wishes to draw down under the Credit Facility on [date of drawdown] the amount of $l.

 

You are hereby irrevocably authorized and directed to pay the proceeds of the drawdown as follows:

 

[To be added]

 

and this shall be your good and sufficient authority for so doing.

 

All capitalized terms defined in the Loan Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Loan Agreement.

 

DATED the ______ day of _______________, 20___.

 

  ORLA MINING LTD.
   
   
  Per:  
    Name:
    Title:      Authorized Signatory
     
     
  Per:  
    Name:
    Title:      Authorized Signatory

 

 

 

 

Schedule E
Corporate Structure

 

 

 

 

 

Schedule F
Relevant Jurisdictions

 

Obligor   Jurisdiction
of
Formation
  Address of
Chief
Executive
Office
  Address(es)
where Books
and Records
are located
  Place(s) of
Business
  Jurisdictions(s)
where
Tangible
Assets are held
Orla Mining Ltd.   Canada   202 – 595  Howe Street
Vancouver, BC
V6C 2T5
  202 – 595  Howe Street
Vancouver, BC
V6C 2T5
  202 – 595  Howe Street
Vancouver, BC
V6C 2T5
  British Columbia
Minera Cerro Quema, S.A.   Panama   El Vigia, Luis Rios y Octava el Vigia, 5438, village of San Juan Bautista, district of Chitré, province of Herrera, Rep. of Panama
  MMG Tower, 23rd Floor Ave. Paseo del Mar
Costa del Este Panama City Rep. of Panama
 
El Vigia, Luis Rios y Octava el Vigia, 5438, village of San Juan Bautista, district of Chitré, province of Herrera, Rep. of Panama
  El Vigia, Luis Rios y Octava el Vigia, 5438, village of  San Juan Bautista, district of Chitré, province of Herrera, Rep. of Panama   Panama
Minera Camino Rojo, S.A de C.V.   Mexico   Avenida Universidad #250 Interior 1-C, Colonia Militar, Zacatecas, Zacatecas. C.P. 98065   Calle Roma No. 1205
Colonia Vista Hermosa
Chihuahua, Chih., C.P. 31205
  Calle 11 de Agosto # 7 Colonia Centro , Mazapil Zacatecas 98230
 
Avenida Universidad #250 Interior 1-C, Colonia Militar, Zacatecas, Zacatecas. C.P. 98065
  Mexico

 

 

 

Schedule G
Security Documents

 

A. Tranche One Security Documents (governed by Ontario law)

 

1. General Security Agreement executed by the Borrower in favour of the Collateral Agent.

 

2. Pledge Agreement granted by Hans Smit, as minority shareholder of Camino Rojo, in respect of 1 Series A share of Camino Rojo (such share being the “CR Minority Share”)

 

3. Guarantee of Camino Rojo in favour of the Collateral Agent.

 

4. Guarantee of Cerro Quema in favour of the Collateral Agent.

 

5. General Security Agreement executed by Camino Rojo in favour of the Collateral Agent.

 

6. General Security Agreement executed by Cerro Quema in favour of the Collateral Agent.

 

7. Subordination agreements granted in favour of the Collateral Agent by each of:

 

(a) the Borrower;

 

(b) Camino Rojo; and

 

(c) Cerro Quema.

 

B. Tranche Two/Three Security Documents

 

1. Guarantee from Camino Rojo in favour of the Collateral Agent. (Mexican law).

 

2. Mexican law security agreement/non-possessory pledge granted by Camino Rojo (including granting security over the mining concessions) in respect of all assets of Camino Rojo not subject to the trust agreement in item 6 below.

 

3. Mortgage over movables (re: personal property) granted by Cerro Quema.

 

4. Mexican law trust agreement granted by the minority shareholder of Camino Rojo in respect of the CR Minority Share.

 

5. Panamanian law pledge agreement granted by the Borrower in respect of the shares of Cerro Quema.

 

6. Mexican law trust agreement granted by the Borrower and Camino Rojo in respect of (a) all shares of Camino Rojo other than the CR Minority Share and (b) equipment and machinery of Camino Rojo.

 

 

 

7. If required under Mexican law, Mexican law subordination agreements granted by each of:

 

(a) the Borrower (if necessary);

 

(b) Camino Rojo; and

 

(c) Cerro Quema.

 

G-2

 

 

Schedule H
Material Agreements and Permits

 

Material Agreements

 

1.            [commercially sensitive information redacted]

 

2. Agreement for Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management Services, between Camino Rojo and M3 MEXICANA S de RL de CV, once the same becomes effective.

 

3. Investor Rights Agreement, dated October 18, 2019, between the Borrower and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited.

 

4. Asset Purchase Agreement re: the Camino Rojo Project, dated June 20, 2017, among the Borrower, Camino Rojo, Minera Peñasquito, S.A. de C.V., and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (as successor to Goldcorp Inc.).

 

5. Assignment Agreement over Mining Concessions, dated June 20, 2017, between Camino Rojo and Minera Peñasquito, S.A. de C.V.

 

6. [commercially sensitive information redacted],

 

7. [commercially sensitive information redacted],

 

8. [commercially sensitive information redacted],

 

Permits

 

Camino Rojo Project

 

1. Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Use Change) issued by the Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources) (“SEMARNAT”), once the same is obtained.

 

2. Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement) issued by SEMARNAT, once the same is obtained.

 

3. The following water concessions granted by the Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA):

 

Title of Concession   Volume of Concession  
07ZAC154052/37IMDL13     3,695,900.00  
07ZAC155063/37fMDL14     6,000,000.00  

 

 

 

4. The following mineral concessions:

 

Table 4-1

Listing of Mining Concessions

 

            Validity   Area
Concession Name   File Number (Expediente)   Title
Number
  Title Issued
Date
  Expiration
Date
  Hectares
Camino Rojo   093/28336   230914   06/11/2007   05/11/2057   8,340.7905
Camino Rojo 1   093/28349   231922   16/05/2008   15/05/2058   88,897.3255
Camino Rojo 1 Frac. A   093/28349   231923   16/05/2008   15/05/2058   96.8888
Camino Rojo 3   093/28425   232014   03/06/2008   02/06/2058   30,050.0000
Camino Rojo 2   093/28417   232076   10/06/2008   09/06/2058   17,847.4398
Camino Rojo 4   093/28465   232644   02/10/2008   01/10/2058   9,701.0000
Camino Rojo 5   093/28534   232647   02/10/2008   01/10/2058   33,018.4718

 

Cerro Quema Project

 

The following three contracts between the Republic of Panama and Cerro Quema, which grant exclusive rights for mineral extraction:

 

· Contract No. 19, dated February 26, 1997, for the exclusive rights for the extraction of Class IV metallic minerals (gold and silver) for 5,000 ha and effective for 20 years, identified in the National Directorate of Mineral Resources with the symbol MCQSA-EXTR (gold and silver) 96-63

 

· Contract No. 20, dated February 26, 1997, for the exclusive rights for the extraction of Class IV metallic minerals (gold and silver) for 5,000 ha and effective for 20 years, identified in the National Directorate of Mineral Resources with the symbol MCQSA-EXTR (gold and silver) 96-62

 

· Contract No. 21, dated March 3, 1997, for the exclusive rights for the extraction of Class IV metallic minerals (gold and silver) for 4,893 ha and effective for 20 years, identified in the National Directorate of Mineral Resources with the symbol MCQSA-EXTR (gold and silver) 96-64.

 

H-2

 

 

Schedule I

 

Litigation

 

[commercially sensitive information redacted]

 

 

 

Schedule J
Non-Arm’s Length Transactions

 

Obligor   Non-Arm’s Length Transaction(s)
Orla Mining Ltd.   Amended and Restated Contractor Agreement, dated December 6, 2016, between the Borrower and Octavio Choy, and the transactions contemplated thereby.
Minera Camino Rojo, S.A. de C.V.  

·      Commercial Services Contract, dated February 6, 2018, between Minera Camino Rojo, S.A. de C.V. and Contrataciones Camino Rojo, S.A. de C.V., and the transactions contemplated thereby.

 

·      Commercial Services Contract, dated November 8, 2018, between Minera Camino Rojo, S.A. de C.V. and Servicios Camino Rojo, S.A. de C.V., and the transactions contemplated thereby.

Minera Cerro Quema, S.A.   Nil.

 

 

 

Schedule K
Accredited Investor Status Certificate

 

See attached.

 

 

 

ACCREDITED INVESTOR STATUS CERTIFICATE

 

TO: ORLA MINING LTD. (THE “ISSUER”)

 

In connection with the issuance of common share purchase warrants (the “Warrants”) in the capital of the Issuer with an exercise price of Cdn$3.00 per common share and a seven (7) year exercise period from the date of issue, to be issued in consideration for the commitment to fund a non-revolving term credit facility in the amount of Usd$125,000,000, in accordance with the terms of a credit agreement dated November [l], 2019, to the undersigned subscriber or, if applicable, the disclosed principal on whose behalf the undersigned is acting as agent (the “Subscriber” for the purposes of this Certificate), the Subscriber hereby represents, warrants, covenants and certifies to the Issuer that:

 

1. the Subscriber is either acquiring the Warrants as principal for the Subscriber’s own account or is deemed under National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI 45-106”) to be acquiring the Warrants as principal;

 

2. the Subscriber is resident in or otherwise subject to the securities laws of one of the Provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Québec, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick or Prince Edward Island;

 

3. the Subscriber is an “accredited investor” within the meaning of NI 45-106 on the basis that the Subscriber fits within one of the categories of an “accredited investor” reproduced below beside which the Subscriber has indicated the undersigned belongs to such category;

 

4. the Subscriber was not created or used solely to purchase or hold securities as an accredited investor as described in paragraph (m) below; and

 

5. the undersigned acknowledges that the foregoing representations, warranties and covenants are made by the undersigned with the intent that they be relied upon in determining the suitability of the Subscriber as an acquirer of the Warrants and the undersigned undertakes to immediately notify the Issuer of any change in any statement or other information relating to the Warrants set forth herein which takes place prior to the closing time (the “Closing Time”) of the issuance of the Warrants.

 

The categories listed herein contain certain specifically defined terms. If you are unsure as to the meanings of those terms, or are unsure as to the applicability of any category below, please contact your broker and/or legal advisor before completing this Certificate.

 

Additional Instruction: If the Subscriber is an individual and qualifies as an accredited investorpursuant to paragraphs (j), (k) or (l) below, it must also complete and sign Schedule A attached hereto entitled “Form 45-106F9: Form for Individual Accredited Investors” and the individual accredited investor questionnaire attached thereto.

 

The Subscriber is [check appropriate box and complete related blanks]:

 

¨ (a) except in Ontario, a Canadian financial institution, or a Schedule III bank, or in Ontario, a bank listed in Schedule I, II or III to the Bank Act (Canada);
     
¨ (b) the Business Development Bank of Canada incorporated under the Business Development Bank of Canada Act (Canada);
     
¨ (c) a subsidiary of any person referred to in paragraphs (a) or (b), if the person owns all of the voting securities of the subsidiary, except the voting securities required by law to be owned by directors of that subsidiary;

 

 

 

 

¨ (d)

a person registered under the securities legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada, as an adviser or dealer;

 

¨ (e) an individual registered under the securities legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada as a representative of a person referred to in paragraph (d);
     
¨ (e.1) an individual formerly registered under the securities legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada, other than an individual formerly registered solely as a representative of a limited market dealer under one or both of the Securities Act (Ontario) or the Securities Act (Newfoundland and Labrador);
     
¨ (f) the Government of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada, or any crown corporation, agency or wholly owned entity of the Government of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada;
     
£ (g) a municipality, public board or commission in Canada and a metropolitan community, school board, the Comité de gestion de la taxe scolaire de l’île de Montréal or an intermunicipal management board in Québec;
     
¨ (h) any national, federal, state, provincial, territorial or municipal government of or in any foreign jurisdiction, or any agency of that government;
     
¨ (i) a pension fund that is regulated by either the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (Canada), a pension commission or similar regulatory authority of a jurisdiction of Canada;

 

¨ (j) 

 an individual who, either alone or with a spouse, beneficially owns financial assets having an aggregate realizable value that before taxes, but net of any related liabilities, exceeds Cdn$1,000,000;

[If qualifying under this paragraph, the Subscriber must also complete and sign Schedule A attached hereto entitled “Form 45-106F9: Form for Individual Accredited Investors”]

     
¨ (j.1) an individual who beneficially owns financial assets having an aggregate realizable value that, before taxes, but net of any related liabilities exceeds $5,000,000;
     
¨ (k)

an individual whose net income before taxes exceeded Cdn$200,000 in each of the two most recent calendar years or whose net income before taxes combined with that of a spouse exceeded Cdn$300,000 in each of the two most recent calendar years and who, in either case, reasonably expects to exceed that net income level in the current calendar year;

[If qualifying under this paragraph, the Subscriber must also complete and sign Schedule A attached hereto entitled “Form 45-106F9: Form for Individual Accredited Investors”]

     
¨ (l)

an individual who, either alone or with a spouse, has net assets of at least Cdn$5,000,000;

[If qualifying under this paragraph, the Subscriber must also complete and sign Schedule A attached hereto entitled “Form 45-106F9: Form for Individual Accredited Investors”]

     
¨ (m) a person, other than an individual or investment fund, that has net assets of at least Cdn$5,000,000 as shown on its most recently prepared financial statements;
     
¨ (n)

an investment fund that distributes or has distributed its securities only to:

 

(i)       a person that is or was an accredited investor at the time of the distribution;

 

(ii)      a person that acquires or acquired securities in the circumstances referred to in sections 2.10 and 2.19 of NI45-106, or

 

(iii)      a person described in paragraph (i) or (ii) that acquires or acquired securities under section 2.18 of NI45-106;

     
¨ (o) an investment fund that distributes or has distributed securities under a prospectus in a jurisdiction of Canada for which the regulator or, in Quebec, the securities regulatory authority, has issued a receipt;
     
¨ (p) a trust company or trust corporation registered or authorized to carry on business under the Trust and Loan Companies Act (Canada) or under comparable legislation in a jurisdiction of Canada or a foreign jurisdiction, acting on behalf of a fully managed account managed by the trust company or trust corporation, as the case may be;
     
¨ (q) a person acting on behalf of a fully managed account managed by that person, if that person is registered or authorized to carry on business as an adviser or the equivalent under the securities legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada or a foreign jurisdiction;

 

K-3

 

¨ (r) a registered charity under the Income Tax Act (Canada) that, in regard to the trade, has obtained advice from an eligibility adviser or an adviser registered under the securities legislation of the jurisdiction of the registered charity to give advice on the securities being traded;
     
¨ (s) an entity organized in a foreign jurisdiction that is analogous to any of the entities referred to in paragraphs (a) to (d) or paragraph (i) in form and function;
     
¨ (t) a person in respect of which all of the owner of interests, direct, indirect or beneficial, except the voting securities required by law to be owned by directors, are persons that are accredited investors;
     
¨ (u) an investment fund that is advised by a person registered as an adviser or a person that is exempt from registration as an adviser;
     
¨ (v) a person that is recognized or designated by the securities regulatory authority or, except in Ontario and Quebec, the regulator as an accredited investor; or
     
¨ (w) a trust established by an accredited investor for the benefit of the accredited investor’s family members of which a majority of the trustees are accredited investors and all of the beneficiaries are the accredited investor’s spouse, a former spouse of the accredited investor or a parent, grandparent, brother, sister, child or grandchild of that accredited investor, of that accredited investor’s spouse or of that accredited investor’s former spouse.

 

Definitions:

 

Canadian financial institution” means

 

(a) an association governed by the Cooperative Credit Associations Act (Canada) or a central cooperative credit society for which an order has been made under section 473(1) of that Act, or

 

(b) a bank, loan corporation, trust company, trust corporation, insurance company, treasury branch, credit union, caisse populaire, financial services cooperative, or league that, in each case, is authorized by an enactment of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada to carry on business in Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada;

 

financial assets” means

 

(a) cash,

 

(b) securities, or

 

(c) a contract of insurance, a deposit or an evidence of a deposit that is not a security for the purposes of securities legislation;

 

fully managed account” means an account of a client for which a person makes the investment decisions if that person has full discretion to trade in securities for the account without requiring the client’s express consent to a transaction;

 

investment fund” has the same meaning as in National Instrument 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure;

 

person” includes

 

(a) an individual,

 

(b) a corporation,

 

(c) a partnership, trust, fund and an association, syndicate, organization or other organized group of persons, whether incorporated or not, and

 

(d) an individual or other person in that person’s capacity as a trustee, executor, administrator or personal or other legal representative;

 

K-4

 

related liabilities” means

 

(a) liabilities incurred or assumed for the purpose of financing the acquisition or ownership of financial assets, or

 

(b) liabilities that are secured by financial assets;

 

Schedule III bank” means an authorized foreign bank named in Schedule III of the Bank Act (Canada);

 

spouse” means, an individual who,

 

(a) is married to another individual and is not living separate and apart within the meaning of the Divorce Act (Canada), from the other individual; or

 

(b) is living with another individual in a marriage-like relationship, including a marriage-like relationship between individuals of the same gender; or

 

(c) in Alberta, is an individual referred to in paragraph (a) or (b), or is an adult interdependent partner within the meaning of the Adult Interdependent Relationships Act (Alberta);

 

subsidiary” means in issuer that is controlled directly or indirectly by another issuer and includes a subsidiary of that subsidiary.

 

* * * * * * *

 

signature page follows

 

K-5

 

 

The representations, warranties, statements and certification made in this Certificate are true and accurate as of the date of this Certificate and will be true and accurate at the Closing Time. If any such representation, warranty, statement or certification becomes untrue or inaccurate prior to the Closing Time, the Subscriber shall give the Issuer immediate written notice thereof.

 

The Subscriber acknowledges and agrees that the Issuer will and can rely on this Certificate in connection with the Subscriber’s acquisition of Warrants.

 

IN WITNESS, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the                day of                                     , 20       .

 

1. SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION

 

If a corporation, partnership or other entity:   If an individual:
     
     
(Print Name of Subscriber)   (Print Name of Subscriber)
     
(Signature of Authorized Signatory)   (Signature)
     
(Name and Position of Authorized Signatory)   (Jurisdiction of Residence of Subscriber)
     
(Jurisdiction of Residence of Subscriber)    

 

2. NUMBER OF WARRANTS

 

The total number of Warrants to be acquired by the Subscriber is as follows:

 

 

 

 

3. REGISTRATION INSTRUCTIONS

 

The Subscriber directs the Issuer to register the Warrants as follows:

 

   
(Registration Name and Account Number)  
   
(Registration Address – Include City, Province and Postal Code)  
   
(Registered Holder: Contact Name, Contact Telephone Number and Contact Email Address)  

 

4. DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

 

If the Warrants are to be delivered other than as set out above, the Subscriber directs the Issuer to deliver the Warrants as follows:

 

 

(Name of Recipient)

 

 

(Address of Recipient – Include City, Province and Postal Code)

 

 

(Recipient: Contact Name, Contact Telephone Number and Contact Email Address)

 

[Signature page to follow]

 

K-6

 

ACCEPTANCE

 

Accepted by this Issuer as of the ____ day of
____________________, 20       .
)
)
)
)
ORLA MINING LTD.
 
 
Per:  
  )   Authorized Signatory

 

 

K-7

 

PERSONAL INFORMATION

 

1. Present Ownership of Securities of the Issuer. The Subscriber owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over, ______________ common shares of the Issuer and securities convertible or exercisable to acquire an additional ______________ common shares of the Issuer.

 

2. Insider Status. The Subscriber either [check appropriate box]:

 

¨ is an “Insider” of the Issuer as defined in the British Columbia Securities Act, determined as follows:

 

(a) a director or officer of the Issuer;

 

(b) a director or officer of a person that is itself an insider or subsidiary of the Issuer; or

 

(c) a person that has direct or indirect:

 

(1) beneficial ownership of or control or direction over; or

 

(2) a combination of beneficial ownership of and control or direction over,

 

securities of the Issuer carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all the Issuer’s outstanding voting securities, excluding, for the purpose of the calculation of the percentage held, any securities held by the person as underwriter in the course of a distribution.

 

¨ is not an Insider of the Issuer.

 

3. Registrant Status. The Subscriber either [check appropriate box]:

 

¨ is a registrant (as defined in applicable securities laws)

 

¨ is not a registrant.

 

K-8

 

SCHEDULE A

 

Form 45-106F9

 

Form for Individual Accredited Investors

 

WARNING!

 

This investment is risky. Don’t invest unless you can afford to lose all the money you pay for this investment.

 

SECTION 1 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ISSUER OR SELLING SECURITY HOLDER
1. About your investment
Type of securities:  Warrants Issuer:  Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Issuer”)
Purchased from:  The Issuer
SECTIONS 2 TO 4 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PURCHASER
2. Risk acknowledgement
This investment is risky. Initial that you understand that: Your initials
Risk of loss – You could lose your entire investment of $ ________. [Instruction: Insert the total dollar amount of the investment.]  
Liquidity risk – You may not be able to sell your investment quickly – or at all.  
Lack of information – You may receive little or no information about your investment.  
Lack of advice – You will not receive advice from the salesperson about whether this investment is suitable for you unless the salesperson is registered. The salesperson is the person who meets with, or provides information to, you about making this investment. To check whether the salesperson is registered, go to  www.aretheyregistered.ca.  
3. Accredited investor status
If you are relying on a prospectus exemption contained in any of sections (j), (k), or (l) of Category 1 “Accredited Investor” in Form 1, you must meet at least one of the following criteria to be able to make this investment. Initial the statement that applies to you. (You may initial more than one statement.) The person identified in section 6 is responsible for ensuring that you meet the definition of accredited investor. That person, or the salesperson identified in section 5, can help you if you have questions about whether you meet these criteria. Your initials
 Your net income before taxes was more than $200,000 in each of the 2 most recent calendar years, and you expect it to be more than $200,000 in the current calendar year. (You can find your net income before taxes on your personal income tax return.)  
•  Your net income before taxes combined with your spouse’s was more than $300,000 in each of the 2 most recent calendar years, and you expect your combined net income before taxes to be more than $300,000 in the current calendar year.  
•   Either alone or with your spouse, you own more than $1 million in cash and securities, after subtracting any debt related to the cash and securities.  
•  Either alone or with your spouse, you have net assets worth more than $5 million. (Your net assets are your total assets (including real estate) minus your total debt.)  

4. Your name and signature

By signing this form, you confirm that you have read this form and you understand the risks of making this investment as identified in this form.
First and last name (please print):
Signature: Date:
SECTION 5 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE SALESPERSON
5. Salesperson information
[Instruction: The salesperson is the person who meets with, or provides information to, the purchaser with respect to making this investment. That could include a representative of the issuer or selling security holder, a registrant or a person who is exempt from the registration requirement.]
First and last name of salesperson (please print):
Telephone: Email:
Name of firm (if registered):
SECTION 6 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ISSUER OR SELLING SECURITY HOLDER
6. For more information about this investment

Orla Mining Ltd.
Suite 202 - 595 Howe Street
Vancouver, BC
V6C 2T5

 

Attention: Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer

 

Telephone: 604 564 1852

 

Email: etienne.morin@orlamining.com

 

For more information about prospectus exemptions, contact your local securities regulator. You can find contact information at www.securities-administrators.ca.

 

 

K-9

 

Form instructions:

 

1. This form does not mandate the use of a specific font size or style but the font must be legible.

 

2. The information in sections 1, 5 and 6 must be completed before the purchaser completes and signs the form.

 

3. The purchaser must sign this form. Each of the purchaser and the issuer or selling security holder must receive a copy of this form signed by the purchaser. The issuer or selling security holder is required to keep a copy of this form for 8 years after the distribution.

 

K-10

 

INDIVIDUAL ACCREDITED INVESTOR QUESTIONNAIRE (CANADIAN)

 

THIS QUESTIONNAIRE IS TO BE COMPLETED BY ACCREDITED INVESTORS WHO ARE INDIVIDUALS

 

Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the subscription agreement accompanying this questionnaire. I understand that in order to be accepted as an “accredited investor” under National Instrument 45-106, I must satisfy certain of the following criteria. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants to the Issuer as follows:

 

1. Financial Circumstances. Please answer the following questions concerning your financial status by marking the appropriate box and filling in the blanks.

 

1.1 Was your net income before taxes more than $200,000 in each of the 2 most recent calendar years?

 

¨      Yes                  ¨      No

 

1.2 If you answered “Yes” to Question 1.1, do you expect your net income before taxes to be more than $200,000 in the current calendar year?

 

¨      Yes                  ¨      No

 

1.3 Was your net income before taxes combined with your spouse’s net income before taxes more than $300,000 in each of the 2 most recent calendar years?

 

¨      Yes                  ¨      No

 

1.4 If you answered “Yes” to Question 1.3, do you expect your net income before taxes combined with your spouse’s net income before taxes to be more than $300,000 in the current calendar year?

 

¨      Yes                  ¨      No

 

1.5 Do you own, either alone or with your spouse, more than $1,000,000 in cash and securities, after subtracting any debt related to the cash and securities?

 

¨      Yes                  ¨      No

 

1.6 Do you own, either alone or with your spouse, have net assets (i.e., your total assets (including real estate) less your total debt) worth more than $5,000,000?

 

¨      Yes                  ¨      No

 

1.7 Please indicate, for each of the two most recent years, what your individual net income before taxes (or joint net income before taxes together with your spouse) was, and for the current year what your individual net income before taxes (or joint net income before taxes together with your spouse) is expected to be:

 

2017 Individual   Joint  
2018 Individual   Joint  
2019 Individual   Joint  

 

2. Financial Background. Please respond to the following questions, supplying as much detail as possible in order to make your answers complete.

 

K-11

 

2.1 Indicate by check mark which of the following categories best describes the extent of your prior experience in the areas of investment listed below:

 

No Experience   Some Experience   Substantial Experience
         
 ¨    ¨    ¨ Marketable Securities
 ¨    ¨    ¨ Securities for which no public market exists

2.2 For those investments for which you indicated “Substantial Experience” or “Some Experience” in question 2.1 above, please answer the following additional question:

 

How often do you make your own investment decisions with respect to such investments?

 

2.3 Do you have adequate means of providing for your current needs and personal contingencies and have no need for liquidity in such investments?

 

¨      Yes                  ¨      No

 

2.4 Please indicate whether you are borrowing the money to be used to purchase securities in the Offering?

 

¨      Yes                  ¨      No

 

I hereby represent and warrant that:

 

(a) my net income before taxes was more than $200,000 in each of the 2 most recent calendar years, and I expect it to be more than $200,000 in the current calendar year;

 

(b) my net income before taxes combined with my spouse’s was more than $300,000 in each of the 2 most recent calendar years, and I expect that our combined net income before taxes to be more than $300,000 in the current calendar year;

 

(c) either alone or with my spouse, I own more than $1,000,000 in cash and securities, after subtracting any debt related to the cash and securities; or

 

(d) either alone or with my spouse, I have net assets worth more than $5,000,000.

 

My commitment to investments which are not readily marketable is reasonable in relation to my net worth. I meet at least one of the criteria for an “accredited investor” under National Instrument 45-106. The foregoing representations and warranties and all other information which I have provided to the Issuer concerning myself and my financial condition are true and accurate as of the date hereof. If in any respect, such representations, warranties, or information shall not be true and accurate, I will give written notice of such fact to the Issuer specifying which representations, warranties or information are not true and accurate, and the reasons therefor. I understand that the information contained herein is being furnished by me in order for the Issuer to determine my suitability as an accredited investor, may be accepted by the Issuer in light of the requirements of NI 45-106 and that the Issuer will rely on the information contained herein for purposes of such determination.

 

K-12

 

Dated:   , 2019   Signed:  
     
     
     
Witness   Print name
     
     
Print Name of Witness    

 

K-13

 

Schedule L
U.S. Accredited Investor Status Certification Letter

 

See attached.

 

 

 

 

The Warrants and the Warrant Shares (collectively, the “Securities”) have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”) or the securities laws of any states of the United States, and may not be offered or sold within the United States except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws.

 

The Securities have not been recommended, approved or disapproved by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), by any state regulatory authority or by any Canadian regulatory authority, nor has the SEC or any state regulatory authority or Canadian regulatory authority passed on the accuracy or adequacy of this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

U.S. ACCREDITED INVESTOR CERTIFICATION LETTER

 

TO:      Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Company”)

 

RE:      Warrants for purchase of Common Shares of Orla Mining Ltd. (“Warrants”)

 

Instructions: Complete and sign this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter. Please be sure to also fully complete the Accredited Investor Affirmation contained in Section (3).

 

Number of Warrants:    
     
Ladies and Gentlemen:    

 

Re:      Warrants for Purchase of Common Shares

 

In connection with its agreement to participate with respect to a secured project finance facility for the development of certain projects of the Company, in part, for Warrants with the right to subscribe for and purchase of fully paid and non-assessable common shares (“Common Shares”) in the capital of the Company at any time prior to 5:00 p.m. (Vancouver Time) (the “Expiry Time”) on the Expiry Date (as defined in the certificate representing the Warrant) at a price (the “Exercise Price”) of C$3.00 per Common Share in accordance with the terms and conditions of such Warrant, undersigned, on its own behalf and on behalf of each person for whom it is acting (collectively referred to herein, as applicable, as “undersigned”), acknowledges, represents, warrants, covenants and agrees with the Company as follows, and certifies (and acknowledges that the Company, the and their respective counsel are relying thereon):

 

(1) undersigned acknowledges and agrees that the Warrants and the shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants (each a “Warrant Share”) have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act or the securities laws of an applicable state of the United States, and that the issuance of the Warrants and the Warrant Shares, as applicable, in the United States is being made in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 506(b) of Regulation D under the U.S. Securities Act and/or Section 4(a)(2) promulgated under the U.S. Securities Act, or such similar exemption from registration;

 

(2) undersigned is (i) a U.S. Person (as defined pursuant to Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act); (ii) a person purchasing Shares for the account or benefit of a person in the United States; (iii) a person that receives or received an offer of the Warrants while in the United States; or (iv) a person that is in the United States at the time their order was originated or this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter was executed;

 

(3) (THIS SECTION IS MUST BE COMPLETED) it (i) is an “accredited investor” within the meaning of Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the U.S. Securities Act (a “U.S. Accredited Investors”) and is acquiring the Warrants and the Warrant Shares, as applicable, for its own account or for the account of one or more U.S. Accredited Investor with respect to which it exercises sole investment discretion (“Beneficial Purchaser”), and not with a view to resale, distribution or other disposition of any of the Warrants and the Warrant Shares, as applicable, in violation of United States federal or state securities laws and (ii) satisfies one or more of the categories indicated below (please place an “X” and initial on the appropriate line or lines and, if there is a Beneficial Purchaser, undersigned must mark “P” beside the category applicable to undersigned and “BP” beside the category applicable to the Beneficial Purchaser), and is (mark all that apply):

 

L-2

 

_______ Category 1.       A bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the U.S. Securities Act, whether acting in its individual or fiduciary capacity; or

 

_______ Category 2.      A savings and loan association or other institution as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the U.S. Securities Act, whether acting in its individual or fiduciary capacity; or;

 

_______ Category 3.       A broker or dealer registered pursuant to Section 15 of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; or;

 

_______ Category 4.       An insurance company as defined in Section 2(13) of the U.S. Securities Act; or

 

_______ Category 5.       An investment company registered under the United States Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended; or

 

_______ Category 6.       A business development company as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the United States Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended; or

 

_______ Category 7.       A small business investment company licensed by the U.S. Small Business Administration under Section 301 (c) or (d) of the United States Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended; or

 

_______ Category 8.       A plan established and maintained by a state, its political subdivisions or any agency or instrumentality of a state or its political subdivisions, for the benefit of its employees, with total assets in excess of U.S. $5,000,000; or

 

_______ Category 9.      An employee benefit plan within the meaning of the United States Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 in which the investment decision is made by a plan fiduciary, as defined in Section 3(21) of such Act, which is either a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company or registered investment adviser, or an employee benefit plan with total assets in excess of U.S. $5,000,000 or, if a self-directed plan, with investment decisions made solely by persons who are accredited investors; or

 

_______ Category 10.     A private business development company as defined in Section 202(a)(22) of the United States Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended; or

 

_______ Category 11.  An organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, a corporation, a Massachusetts or similar business trust, or a partnership, not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities offered, with total assets in excess of U.S. $5,000,000; or

 

_______ Category 12.     Any director or executive officer of the Company; or

 

_______ Category 13.     A natural person that has a net worth (or joint net worth together with his or her spouse) excluding the “net value” of his or her primary residence, in excess of US$1,000,000 and no reason to believe that net worth will not remain in excess of US$1,000,000 for the foreseeable future. “Net value” for such purposes is the fair value of the residence less any mortgage indebtedness or other obligation secured by the residence, provided that any amount of the secured obligation in excess of the value of the residence is considered a liability and must be deducted from the investor’s net worth; or

 

_______ Category 14.    A natural person who had an individual income in excess of U.S. $200,000 in each of the two most recent years or joint income with that person’s spouse in excess of U.S. $300,000 in each of those years and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year; or

 

L-3

 

_______ Category 15.     A trust, with total assets in excess of U.S. $5,000,000, not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities offered, whose purchase is directed by a sophisticated person as described in Rule 506(b)(2)(ii) under the U.S. Securities Act; or

 

_______ Category 16.     Any entity in which all of the equity owners meet the requirements of at least one of the above categories (if this alternative is checked, you must at the request of the Company identify each equity owner and provide statements signed by each demonstrating how each qualifies as a U.S. Accredited Investor).

 

(4) if undersigned is: (a) a corporation, it is duly incorporated and is validly subsisting under the laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation and has all requisite legal and corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter, to acquire the Warrants as contemplated herein and to carry out and perform its obligations under the terms of this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter and the individual signing this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter has been duly authorized to execute and deliver this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter; or (b) an individual, partnership, syndicate or other form of unincorporated organization, it has the necessary legal capacity and authority to execute and deliver this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter and to observe and perform its covenants and obligations hereunder and has obtained all necessary approvals in respect thereof and the individual signing this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter has been duly authorized to execute and deliver this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter;

 

(5) the execution and delivery of this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter and the performance and compliance with the terms hereof will not result in any breach of, or be in conflict with, or constitute a default under, or create a state of facts which after notice or lapse of time or both would constitute a default under, any term or provision of any controlling documents, by-laws or resolutions of undersigned or any indenture, contract, agreement (whether written or oral), instrument or other document to which undersigned is a party or subject, or any judgment, decree, order, statute, rule or regulation applicable to undersigned;

 

(6) this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter has been duly and validly authorized, executed and delivered by, and upon acceptance by the Company constitutes a legal, valid, binding and enforceable obligation of, undersigned; if undersigned is contracting hereunder as trustee, agent, representative or nominee for one or more beneficial purchasers, undersigned has due and proper authority to execute and deliver this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter on behalf of each such beneficial purchaser and to act on behalf of each such beneficial purchaser in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby and acknowledges that the Company may be required by law to disclose to certain regulatory authorities the identity of each beneficial purchaser of Warrants and the Warrant Shares for whom undersigned may be acting;

 

(7) undersigned has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters as to be capable of evaluating the merits and risks of its investment in the Securities and it is able to bear the economic risks of such investment and is able, without impairing its financial condition, to hold the Warrants and the Warrant Shares, as applicable, for an indefinite period of time and to bear the economic risks, and withstand a complete loss of such investment;

 

(8) undersigned understands that the Warrants may not be exercised in the United States or by, or on behalf or for the benefit of, a U.S. Person (as defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act), unless an exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws is available for the issuance of the Warrant Shares, if any, to the U.S. Person and such U.S. Person has furnished an opinion of counsel of recognized standing in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Company to such effect and/or any other certificates or documentation reasonably requested by the Company, the registrar and transfer agent or as required under the Warrant Indenture; following exercise of the Warrants, if such an exercise is available, the Warrant Shares will bear a restrictive legend set forth herein;

 

(9) undersigned understands and acknowledges that each of the Warrants and the Warrant Shares, as applicable, are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144(a)(3) under the U.S. Securities Act, and it agrees that if it decides to offer, sell, pledge or otherwise transfer any of the Warrants and the Warrant Shares, as applicable, directly or indirectly, it will not offer, sell, pledge or otherwise transfer any of such securities, directly or indirectly, other than in compliance with any restrictive legend imprinted thereon, any restrictions or requirements set forth herein, and pursuant to an available exemption from the registration requirements under the U.S. Securities Act and the securities laws of all applicable states of the United States, if any;

 

L-4

 

(10) undersigned understands and acknowledges that certificates representing any Warrants and any Warrant Shares, as applicable, and all certificates issued in exchange for or in substitution of such certificates, will bear the following legend(s), as applicable, upon the original issuance and until the legend is no longer required under applicable requirements of the U.S. Securities Act or applicable state securities laws:

 

THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY [if for Warrants shall also include: AND THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE HEREOF] HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “U.S. SECURITIES ACT”) OR UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES. THE HOLDER HEREOF, BY PURCHASING SUCH SECURITIES, AGREES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE ISSUER OF SUCH SECURITIES AND ITS SUCCESSORS (THE “COMPANY”) THAT SUCH SECURITIES MAY BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED ONLY (A) TO THE COMPANY; (B) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 904 OF REGULATION S UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT, IF AVAILABLE, AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS; (C) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT PROVIDED BY RULE 144 THEREUNDER, IF AVAILABLE, AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS; OR (D) IN A TRANSACTION THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE REGISTRATION UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OR ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS, AND, IN THE CASE OF PARAGRAPH (C) OR (D), THE SELLER HAS PRIOR TO SUCH TRANSFER FURNISHED TO THE COMPANY AN OPINION OF COUNSEL OF RECOGNIZED STANDING IN FORM AND SUBSTANCE SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY TO SUCH EFFECT AND/OR SUCH OTHER CERTIFICATIONS, INFORMATION OR DOCUMENTATION AS REASONABLY REQUESTED BY THE COMPANY. DELIVERY OF THIS CERTIFICATE MAY NOT CONSTITUTE GOOD DELIVERY IN SETTLEMENT OF TRANSACTIONS ON STOCK EXCHANGES IN CANADA.

 

[if a Warrant shall also include: THIS WARRANT MAY NOT BE EXERCISED BY OR ON BEHALF OF, OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OR BENEFIT OF, A PERSON IN THE UNITED STATES OR A U.S. PERSON UNLESS THE COMMON SHARES ISSUABLE UPON EXERCISE OF THIS WARRANT HAVE BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR AN EXEMPTION FROM SUCH REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS IS AVAILABLE.

 

THE WARRANTS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE WILL BE VOID AFTER THE EXPIRY DATE (AS DEFINED IN THIS WARRANT CERTIFICATE).]

 

provided, that if any of the Warrants or Warrant Shares, if any, are being sold in accordance with Rule 904 of Regulation S, this legend may be removed by providing the declarations to the Company and transfer agent in the form attached as Appendix A to this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter (or such other form as the Company may prescribe from time to time), together with any other evidence, which may include an opinion of counsel of recognized standing reasonably satisfactory to the Company and/or transfer agent, to the effect that the legend is no longer required under applicable requirements of the U.S. Securities Act; provided further, that if any of the Warrants or Warrant Shares are being sold pursuant to Rule 144 under the U.S. Securities Act, if available, the legend may be removed by delivery to the Company and the Company’s transfer agent of an opinion of counsel of recognized standing in form and substance satisfactory to the Company and the transfer agent, to the effect that the legend is no longer required under applicable requirements of the U.S. Securities Act or state securities laws;

 

(11) undersigned consents to the Company making a notation on its records or giving instructions to its transfer agent, as applicable, in order to implement the restrictions on transfer set forth and described herein;

 

L-5

 

(12) undersigned has decided to acquire the Warrants and the underlying securities based solely on undersigned’s independent investigation and evaluation of the Company and its assets and undersigned has had access to all materials, books and records and documents relating to the Company as undersigned has desired;

 

(13) undersigned has been provided an opportunity to ask questions of, and receive answers from, authorized representatives of the Company concerning the Company, the Unites and underlying securities, and the terms of the Offering and that any request for such information has been complied with to undersigned’s satisfaction and that it has had the opportunity to consult with its own legal and tax advisors with regards thereto and it is solely responsible for obtaining such legal, tax and other advice, including advice regarding the ability to resell the Warrants or Warrant Shares, if any;

 

(14) undersigned understands and acknowledges that the Company is not obligated to file and have no present intention of filing with the SEC or with any state securities administrator any registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act with respect to any of the Warrants or Warrant Shares;

 

(15) undersigned acknowledges that purchasing, holding and disposing of any of Warrants or Warrant Shares, if any, may have tax consequences under the laws of both Canada and the United States, and that it is solely responsible for determining the tax consequences of investment in such securities and the Company gives no opinion and makes no representation with respect to the tax consequences to undersigned under United States, state, local or foreign tax law of undersigned’s acquisition or disposition of any such securities, or as to any other tax consequences related to any of such securities; and no determination has been made whether the Company will be a “passive foreign investment company” (“PFIC”) within the meaning of Section 1291 of the United States Internal Revenue Code;

 

(16) undersigned understands that financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, which differ from United States generally accepted accounting principles, and thus may not be comparable to financial statements of United States companies;

 

(17) undersigned understands and acknowledges that the Company is not (i) obligated to remain a "foreign issuer" within the meaning of Rule 902 of Regulation S, (ii) may not, at the time the Warrants or Warrant Shares, if any, are resold by it or at any other time, be a foreign issuer, and (iii) may engage in one or more transactions which could cause the Company not to be a foreign issuer;

 

(18) if required by applicable securities legislation, regulatory policy or order or by any securities commission, stock exchange or other regulatory authority, undersigned will execute, deliver and file and otherwise assist the Company in filing reports, questionnaires, undertakings and other documents with respect to the issuance of the securities;

 

(19) undersigned acknowledges and understands that the enforcement by investors of civil liabilities under the United States federal securities laws may be affected adversely by the fact that the Company is incorporated or organized outside the United States, that some or all of its officers and directors and the experts named herein are residents of a foreign country, and that all or a substantial portion of the assets of the Company and said persons are located outside the United States; as a result, it may be difficult or impossible for holders of Warrants or Warrant Shares in the United States to effect service of process within the United States upon the Company, its officers or directors or the experts named herein, or to realize against them upon judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon civil liabilities under the federal securities laws of the United States or “blue sky” laws of any state within the United States; and in addition, holders of Warrants or Warrant Shares in the United States should not assume that the courts of Canada: (a) would enforce judgments of United States courts obtained in actions against such persons predicated upon civil liabilities under the federal securities laws of the United States or “blue sky” laws of any state within the United States; or (b) would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against such persons predicated upon civil liabilities under the federal securities laws of the United States or “blue sky” laws of any state within the United States;

 

(20) it understands that the reserve and resource estimates included in Company materials, filings or information, as applicable, have been prepared in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum classification system, which may differ significantly from the requirements of the SEC and, accordingly, reported information concerning mineral deposits of the Company may not be comparable with information made public by companies that report in accordance with U.S. standards;

 

L-6

 

(21) undersigned is not subject to any of the “Bad Actor” disqualifications described in Rule 506(d)(1)(i) to (viii) under the U.S. Securities Act (each, a “Disqualification Event”), except to the extent an applicable Disqualification Event does not apply to prevent reliance on Rule 506 because of the provisions set forth in Rule 506(d)(2). If undersigned is subject to a Disqualification Event, but the provisions of Rule 506(d)(1) do not apply to prevent reliance on Rule 506 because of the provisions of Rule 506(d)(2), undersigned shall provide the Company with a written description of any matters that would have otherwise triggered disqualification under Rule 506(d)(1) and the reason why the provisions of such paragraph do not apply, including all information which, in the opinion of the Company, may be required to be disclosed by the Company to comply with the provisions of Rule 506(e). The undersigned hereby authorizes the Company to disclose, as contemplated pursuant to Rule 506(e), any and all information with respect to a Disqualification Event relating to undersigned and/or its directors, officers, general partners or managing members, as applicable, that occurred prior to September 23, 2013;

 

(22) undersigned acknowledges that the Corporation may complete additional financings in the future in order to develop the business of the Corporation and to fund its ongoing development; that there is no assurance that such financings will be available and, if available, on reasonable terms; any such future financings may have a dilutive effect on current security holders, including undersigned;

 

(23) undersigned, or others for whom undersigned is contracting hereunder, is solely responsible and the Corporation is not in any way responsible for compliance by undersigned or any beneficial purchaser for whom it is contracting hereunder with all applicable hold periods and resale restrictions to which the Shares are subject;

 

(24) undersigned acknowledges that this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter is subject to rejection or allotment, in whole or in part, by the Corporation; and it is understood and agreed that all consideration tendered herewith shall be returned to undersigned, without interest or deduction, at the address of undersigned set out herein if this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter is not accepted, or if accepted only in part, such portion of the consideration attributable to that portion of the subscription hereunder which is not accepted shall be so returned to undersigned without interest or deduction;

 

(25) undersigned represents and warrants that (i) the consideration or funds representing the applicable purchase price of the Warrants or Warrant Shares, if any, which will be advanced by undersigned for the Warrants or Warrant Shares in the Offering will not represent proceeds of crime for the purposes of the United States Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (the “PATRIOT Act”), and undersigned acknowledges that the Company and/or any of their respective affiliates or representatives in the United States may in the future be required by law to disclose undersigned’s name and other information relating to undersigned’s subscription hereunder, on a confidential basis, pursuant to the PATRIOT Act, and (b) no portion of the funds or consideration representing the applicable purchase price to be provided by undersigned (i) has been or will be derived from or related to any activity that is deemed criminal under the laws of the United States of America, or any other jurisdiction, or (ii) is being tendered on behalf of a person or entity that has not been identified to or by undersigned; and undersigned shall promptly notify the Company and their respective affiliates or representatives in the United States if undersigned discovers that any of such representations ceases to be true and provide the Company and any of their respective affiliates and representatives in the United States with appropriate information in connection therewith;

 

(26) undersigned understands and acknowledges that, absent exceptive relief from the SEC, if a corporation or any predecessor is deemed to have been at any time previously an issuer with no or nominal operations and no or nominal assets other than cash and cash equivalents (including, being deemed a “shell company” defined in Rule 144(i) under the U.S. Securities Act), Rule 144 under the U.S. Securities Act may not be available for resales of restricted securities, and the Company is not obligated to provide Rule 144 information under the U.S. Securities Act for resales of such securities and, as a result, Rule 144 is not available for the public resale of such securities;

 

L-7

 

(27) the Corporation’s counsel, Cassels Brock and Blackwell LLP and Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP, are acting solely for the Corporation in connection with matters set forth herein and undersigned may not rely upon such counsel in any respect; undersigned acknowledges that it has been encouraged to and should obtain independent legal, income tax and investment advice with respect to such matters and accordingly, has been independently advised as to the meanings of all terms contained herein relevant to undersigned for the purposes of giving representations, warranties and covenants under this U.S. Accredited Investor Certification Letter;

 

(28) it represents and warrants that the offer, sale and issuance of the securities is not a transaction, or part of a chain of transactions which, although in technical compliance with an applicable exemption under the U.S. Securities Act, is part of a plan or scheme to evade the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act; and

 

(29) it acknowledges that undersigned (including, any Beneficial Purchaser) has not purchased the Warrants or Warrant Shares as a result of any directed selling efforts (as defined in Rule 902(c) of Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act) or any form of “general solicitation” or “general advertising” (as such terms are defined in Regulation D under the U.S. Securities Act) including advertisements, articles, notices or other communications published in any newspaper, magazine or similar media or broadcast over the Internet, radio, or television, or any seminar or meeting whose attendees have been invited by general solicitation or general advertising or in any other manner involving a public offering within the meaning of Section 4(a)(2) of the U.S. Securities Act.

 

Undersigned acknowledges and agrees that the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein are made by it with the intent that they may be relied upon by the Company and its counsel and representatives, in determining its eligibility to purchase the Warrants and Warrant Shares, as applicable, (or, if applicable, the eligibility of others on whose behalf undersigned purchaser is contracting hereunder to purchase the Warrants and Warrant Shares, as applicable). By this letter undersigned represents and warrants that the foregoing representations and warranties are true and that they shall survive the purchase by it of the Warrants and Warrant Shares, as applicable, and shall continue in full force and effect notwithstanding any subsequent disposition by undersigned of the Warrants and Warrant Shares.

 

The Company is irrevocably authorized to produce this letter or a copy hereof to any interested party in any administrative or legal proceeding or official inquiry with respect to the matters covered hereby.

 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page follows.]

 

L-8

 

Execution by the Potential Warrantholder:

 

EXECUTED by undersigned this _________ day of _________________, 2019.

 

     
Number of Warrants   Consideration

 

     
If an Individual    

 

By:      
  If an Entity, Authorized Signatory   (Undersigned’s Residential or Head Office Address)

 

     
Name (please print)   (Telephone Number)

 

     
Name and Official Capacity or Title of Authorized Signatory (please print)   (Facsimile Number)

 


Registration Instructions (if other than in name of undersigned):
 
Certificate Delivery Instructions (if other than the address above):
     
Name and Address of Residence
(as it should appear on the certificates)
   

 

     
Account reference, if applicable   Account reference, if applicable

 

     
Address of Intermediary   Contact Name

 

    (               )
    Telephone Number

 

L-9

 

IF YOU ARE SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT AS AGENT FOR A BENEFICIAL PURCHASER PLEASE
PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FOR EACH BENEFICIAL PURCHASER
     
Details of Beneficial Purchaser, if applicable    
     
Name of Beneficial Purchaser (please print)   Beneficial Purchaser’s Residential or Head Office Address
     

(Telephone Number)

 

  (Facsimile Number)

 

Acceptance by the Company:

 

        Orla Mining Ltd.
       
Dated:     By:  
        Name:
        Title:

 

L-10

 

APPENDIX A

DECLARATION FOR REMOVAL OF LEGEND (REGULATION S)

 

TO: Orla Mining Ltd.
Suite 202 - 595 Howe St
Vancouver, BC V6C 2T5
CANADA
AND TO: _________________, as registrar and transfer agent for the [warrants] [warrant shares] of Orla Mining Ltd.

 

The undersigned (A) acknowledges that the sale of ___________ [warrants] [warrant shares] of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Company”) to which this declaration relates, is being made in reliance on Rule 904 of Regulation S under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”), and (B) certifies that (1) the undersigned is not (a) an “affiliate” of the Corporation (as that term is defined in Rule 405 under the U.S. Securities Act), (b) a “distributor” as defined in Regulation S or (c) an affiliate of a distributor; (2) the offer of such securities was not made to a person in the United States and either (a) at the time the buy order was originated, the buyer was outside the United States, or the seller and any person acting on its behalf reasonably believed that the buyer was outside the United States, or (b) the transaction was executed on or through the facilities of a designated offshore securities market (such as the TSX Venture Exchange, the Toronto Stock Exchange or the Canadian Securities Exchange) and neither the seller nor any person acting on its behalf knows that the transaction has been prearranged with a buyer in the United States or a U.S. person; (3) neither the seller nor any affiliate of the seller nor any person acting on their behalf has engaged or will engage in any directed selling efforts in the United States in connection with the offer and sale of such securities; (4) the sale is bona fide and not for the purpose of “washing off” the resale restrictions imposed because the securities are “restricted securities” (as that term is defined in Rule 144(a)(3) under the U.S. Securities Act); (5) the seller does not intend to replace securities sold in reliance on Rule 904 of Regulation S with fungible unrestricted securities; and (6) the contemplated sale is not a transaction, or part of a series of transactions, which, although in technical compliance with Regulation S, is part of a plan or scheme to evade the registration provisions of the U.S. Securities Act. Terms used herein have the meanings given to them by Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act.

 

This certification is made by it with the intent that they may be relied upon by the Company and its counsel (as if originally issued to such counsel), and the foregoing representations and warranties are true and shall continue in full force and effect notwithstanding any subsequent disposition by the undersigned of the applicable securities.

 

Dated:      
      Name of Seller

 

    By:  
      Name:  
      Title:  

 

L-11

 

Affirmation By Seller's Broker-Dealer (Regulation S)

 

We have read the foregoing representations of our customer, ________________ (the "Seller") dated _______________, with regard to our sale, for such Seller's account, of __________________ (the "Securities"), of the Company described therein, and on behalf of ourselves we certify and affirm that (A) we have no knowledge that the transaction had been prearranged with a buyer in the United States, (B) at the time the buy order was originated, the buyer was outside the United States, or the Seller and any person acting on its behalf reasonably believed that the buyer was outside of the United States or the transaction was executed on or through the facilities of a "designated offshore securities market", (C) neither we, nor any person acting on our behalf, engaged in any “directed selling efforts” (within the meaning of Rule 902(c) of Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act) in connection with the offer and sale of such securities, and (D) we have complied with the provisions of Rule 904(b) of Regulation S, if applicable, in connection with the sale of the Securities by the seller. Terms used herein have the meanings given to them by Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act. We have executed or will execute, as applicable, sales of the Securities pursuant to and in compliance with Rule 904 of Regulation S (“Regulation S”) under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on behalf of the Seller.

 

Legal counsel to the Company and the Underwriters or U.S. Affiliates shall be entitled to rely upon the representations, warranties and covenants contained in this affirmation to the same extent as if this letter had been addressed to them, it being agreed that such representations, warranties and covenants shall be deemed to be made both as of the date of this affirmation and at the time of the sale of the Securities.

 

Name of Firm:      
     
By (name):      
       
Title:      
       
(an duly authorized officer)    
       
Date:      

 

L-12

 

Schedule M
Encumbrances Consisting of Royalties

 

1. 4.0% net smelter returns royalty payable to the Government of Panama with respect to mineral production at the Cerro Quema Project.

 

2. 2.0% net smelter returns royalty payable to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (as successor to Goldcorp Inc.) with respect to mineral production at the Camino Rojo Project.

 

3. 0.5% royalty payable to the Government of Mexico as an “Extraordinary Mining Duty” with respect to the Camino Rojo Project.

 

 

 

 

Schedule N
Permitted Investments

 

Nil.

 

 

 

 

Schedule O
PERMIT EXCEPTIONS

 

Each of the water concessions relating to the Camino Rojo Project set out in Schedule H were assigned by Minera Peñasquito, S.A. de C.V. to Minera Camino Rojo, S.A. de C.V. pursuant to an Assignment of Water Concession dated November 7, 2017. Application of such assignment has been filed for registration with the National Water Commission and registration is pending.

 

The original 20-year term for each of the mineral concessions relating to the Cerro Quema Project set out in Schedule H expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). Cerro Quema has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law.

 

Mining concessions Camino Rojo 4 and Camino Rojo 5 set out in Schedule H were transferred by Minera Peñasquito, S.A. de C.V. to Minera Camino Rojo, S.A. de C.V. pursuant to an assignment agreement signed between both parties on November 8, 2017; a reduction application has been filed in respect of each of these mining concessions and registration of the transfer of these mining concessions to Camino Rojo is pending until the reduction has been completed.

 

 

 

 

Schedule P
Permitted Debt

 

I. [commercially sensitive information redacted],

 

II. Existing Cerro Quema Bonding Obligations

 

Bonding Obligations totalling US$300,000, of which US$150,000 is cash collateralized and the remainder is insured, all of which are in favour of the Governing Authorities in Panama.

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.46

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

CAMINO ROJO OXIDE GOLD PROJECT ADVANCES TOWARDS PRODUCTION

 

ORLA MINING FINALIZES US$125 MILLION CREDIT AGREEMENT, RECEIVES APPROVAL OF A KEY PERMIT AND THE BOARD APPROVES CONSTRUCTION SPENDING

 

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES

 

VANCOUVER, BC – December 18, 2019 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce that the Company has entered into a loan agreement with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) and certain other lenders with respect to its previously announced US$125 million project finance facility (“Credit Facility”) for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (“Camino Rojo”) located in Zacatecas, Mexico. The Credit Facility was arranged by Trinity Capital and includes a syndicate of lenders led by Agnico Eagle Mines Limited, Pierre Lassonde and Trinity Capital, creating key alignment between debt and equity holders who will support the Company’s development going forward.

 

Concurrent with the closing of the Credit Facility, the Board of Directors of Orla has approved the start of construction spending at Camino Rojo, allowing the continuation of detailed engineering and the ordering of long lead items, such as the crushing system. Commencement of project construction has also been approved, subject to receipt of all required permits.

 

Orla is also pleased to report that the Company has received notification from the Mexican federal government environment department known as SEMARNAT, granting approval of the Change of Land Use permit (Cambio de Uso de Suelo or CUS/ETJ), one of the two key permits required for the development of Camino Rojo.

 

“Securing this US$125 million Credit Facility and one of the key permits marks two more critical milestones in the evolution of Orla, allowing us to maintain our schedule for advancing Camino Rojo toward production in mid-2021. We have accomplished a great deal to get to this point in just two years since the acquisition of the project. With the continued support of local communities, various levels of government, shareholders and now lenders, we can advance toward production by initiating construction in the coming months once the final permit is received,” stated Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer.

 

Credit Facility

 

The Credit Facility provides Orla with US$125 million comprised of three tranches; an initial tranche of US$25 million, which Orla has requested to be drawn on closing, and two subsequent tranches of US$50 million each, available for drawdown after satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the receipt of key permits required for the development of Camino Rojo. The term of the Credit Facility is five years and will bear interest at 8.8% per annum.

 

In connection with the closing of the Credit Facility, Orla has issued 32.5 million common share purchase warrants to the lenders, with a seven year term and an exercise price of C$3.00 per warrant, representing a 97% premium to the closing price of Orla on October 18, 2019, the day prior to announcement of the Credit Facility.

 

1

 

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

The balance of the terms of the Credit Facility are as previously disclosed in the news release dated October 21, 2019 and the commitment letter dated October 20, 2019, which was filed on SEDAR on October 29, 2019.

 

Cutfield Freeman & Co. provided independent advisory services to Orla in connection with the Credit Facility with Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP acting as legal counsel.

 

Permitting Update

 

The other key permit required prior to the start of construction is the Environmental Impact Statement (Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental or MIA). Review of the MIA application by SEMARNAT is ongoing. The construction of Camino Rojo is expected to start during the first half of 2020, upon receipt of all required permits.

 

Qualified Persons

 

Hans Smit, P.Geo., Chief Operating Officer of Orla, has reviewed and verified all technical and scientific information contained in this news release and is a Qualified Person within the meaning of NI 43-101.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 200,000 hectares. Estimated Mineral Reserves as of June 24, 2019 are 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne (“g/t”) and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. (Comprised of Proven Mineral Reserves of 14,595,000 tonnes at 0.79 g/t gold and 15.1 g/t silver and Probable Mineral Reserves of 29,424,000 tonnes at 0.70 g/t gold and 13.7 g/t silver). The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

www.orlamining.com

info@orlamining.com

 

2

 

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

Multilateral Instrument 61-101

 

Mr. Chuck Jeannes, Ms. Elizabeth McGregor and Mr. David Stephens are directors of the Company, and Mr. Lassonde has beneficial ownership of, control or direction over, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company, and each are lenders under the Credit Facility. Accordingly, the Credit Facility and the issuance of the warrants insofar as they involve such insiders constitute related party transactions for the purposes of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (“MI 61-101”). The Company is not required to obtain a formal valuation for the Credit Facility by virtue of section 5.4 of MI 61-101. In addition, the Company is relying on the exemption from the formal valuation and minority approval requirements of MI 61-101 set out in section 5.5(a) and section 5.7(a) of MI 61-101 as the fair market value of the Credit Facility and the warrants insofar as it relates to interested parties is not more than 25% of market capitalization.

 

Disclaimer

 

The securities offered (and any underlying securities) have not been, and will not be, registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "U.S. Securities Act") or any U.S. state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, United States persons absent registration or any applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable U.S. state securities laws. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in the United States, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

 

Forward-looking and Cautionary Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the Credit Facility, including the expected use of proceeds; timeline for commencing construction; results of the feasibility study, including but not limited to the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plan and operations, internal rate of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present value, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; the timing and costs for production decisions; financing timelines and requirements; permitting timelines and requirements; requirements for additional land; exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources; upside opportunities including pit wall angles, land agreements, the development of the sulphide mineral resource and exploration potential; timing for start of engineering work, construction, and receipt of permits; timing for first gold production; and the Company's objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions regarding price of gold and silver; the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: failing to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management; failing to receive the balance of the Credit Facility; risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, including changes in the economic parameters; risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses, as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company’s most recently filed management’s discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 28, 2019, available on www.sedar.com. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

3

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.47

  

  

 

Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

 

Canadian dollars

 

 

   

ORLA MINING LTD.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    September 30     December 31  
    2019     2018  
ASSETS                
Current assets                
Cash and equivalents   $ 5,133     $ 16,686  
Accounts receivable     132       385  
Prepaid expenses     44       206  
      5,309       17,277  
Restricted cash and reclamation deposits     665       205  
Value added taxes recoverable     1,371       849  
Property, plant, and equipment (note 6)     368       344  
Exploration and evaluation assets (note 5)     164,112       169,282  
TOTAL ASSETS   $ 171,825     $ 187,957  
                 
LIABILITIES                
Current liabilities                
Accounts payable (note 7)   $ 489     $ 1,743  
Lease obligation (note 8)     30        
Accrued liabilities     1,500       1,916  
      2,019       3,659  
Lease obligation (note 8)     65        
Newmont loan (note 9)     11,834       6,103  
Site closure provisions     722       745  
TOTAL LIABILITIES     14,640       10,507  
                 
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                
Share capital     206,059       201,077  
Reserves     28,120       25,960  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (gain)     (8 )     4,797  
Accumulated deficit     (76,986 )     (54,384 )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY     157,185       177,450  
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 171,825     $ 187,957  

Nature and continuance of operations (note 1)

Events after the reporting period (note 16)

  

Authorized on November 12, 2019 by the Board of Directors.

  

/s/ David Stephens   /s/ Jason Simpson
David Stephens, Director   Jason Simpson, Director

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 2

 

   

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Loss
(Thousands of Canadian dollars, except per-share amounts) 

 

    Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
    2019     2018     2019     2018  
      restated
note 4
      restated
note 4
 
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENSES (note 5)                                
Assays and analysis   $ 54     $ 381     $ 213     $ 858  
Drilling     386       1,120       1,358       2,265  
Geological     378       989       1,675       3,278  
Engineering     251       172       1,993       373  
Environmental     283       131       706       222  
Community and government     1,400       286       1,867       809  
Land and water use, claims and concessions     1,217       2,154       4,302       4,212  
Project management     50       63       174       170  
Project review     35       48       153       124  
Site activities     501       875       1,682       2,428  
Site administration     229       823       1,679       2,041  
      4,784       7,042       15,802       16,780  
                                 
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES                                
Office and administrative     127       144       506       378  
Professional fees     223       79       496       417  
Regulatory and transfer agent     39       19       126       73  
Salaries and benefits     556       422       1,670       886  
      945       664       2,798       1,754  
                                 
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)                                
Depreciation     34       34       96       100  
Share based payments     758       601       2,918       2,920  
Interest income     (21 )     (134 )     (113 )     (337 )
Interest expense on lease obligations     2             3        
Change in value of Newmont loan (note 9)     638       153       1,071       318  
Foreign exchange loss (gain)     (1 )     10       23       (142 )
Other                 4        
      1,410       664       4,002       2,859  
LOSS FOR THE PERIOD   $ 7,139     $ 8,370     $ 22,602     $ 21,393  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions)     185.1       179.2       181.4       176.0  
Loss per share - basic and diluted   $ 0.04     $ 0.05     $ 0.12     $ 0.12  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 3

 

   

ORLA MINING LTD. 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(Thousands of Canadian dollars, except per-share amounts)

 

    Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
    2019     2018     2019     2018  
      restated
note 4
      restated
note 4
 
LOSS FOR THE PERIOD   $ 7,139     $ 8,370     $ 22,602     $ 21,393  
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME)                                
Items that may in future periods be reclassified to profit or loss                                
Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations     (638 )     (333 )     4,805       (4,456 )
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS   $ 6,501     $ 8,037     $ 27,407     $ 16,937  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
Cash flows provided by (used in):   2019     2018     2019     2018  
          restated
note 4
          restated
note 4
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES                                
Net income (loss) for the period   $ (7,139 )   $ (8,370 )   $ (22,602 )   $ (21,393 )
Adjustments for items not affecting cash:                                
Depreciation     34       34       96       100  
Share based compensation     758       596       2,918       2,920  
Loan proceeds received in excess of fair value credited to exploration expense (note 9)     (757 )     (766 )     (1,707 )     (2,585 )
Change in value of Newmont loan (note 9)     638       149       1,071       306  
Exploration expenses paid via issuance of common shares                 65        
Changes in non-cash working capital:                                
Accounts receivable     (36 )     6       253       97  
Prepaid expenses     30       47       162       182  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     (220 )     (99 )     (1,670 )     (111 )
Cash used in operating activities     (6,692 )     (8,403 )     (21,414 )     (20,484 )
                                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES                                
Proceeds on issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs     3,939             4,288       29,171  
Advances received on the Newmont loan (note 9)     3,186       3,011       6,742       6,928  
Share issuance costs     (111 )           (128 )      
Cash payments against lease obligations     (7 )           (20 )      
Cash provided by financing activities     7,007       3,011       10,882       36,099  
                                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES                                
Purchase of equipment     (7 )     (108 )     (13 )     (173 )
Restricted cash and reclamation deposits funded     (66 )     (4 )     (470 )     (4 )
Value added taxes paid, not immediately recoverable     (173 )     (238 )     (564 )     (508 )
Cash used in investing activities     (246 )     (350 )     (1,047 )     (685 )
                                 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash     33       (61 )     26       55  
                                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents     102       (5,803 )     (11,553 )     14,985  
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period     5,031       26,930       16,686       6,142  
Cash and equivalents, end of period   $ 5,133     $ 21,127     $ 5,133     $ 21,127  
                                 
Cash and equivalents consist of:                                
Bank current accounts and cash on hand                   $ 5,133     $ 21,104  
Short term highly liquid investments                           23  
                    $ 5,133     $ 21,127  

 

Supplemental cash flow information (note 12)

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    Common shares     Reserves                    
    Number
of
shares
(thousands)
    Amount     Warrants     Options     RSUs,
DSUs, and
Bonus
shares
    Total     Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
    Retained
earnings
    Total  
Balances at January 1, 2018, as previously stated     160,441     $ 174,436     $ 14,114     $ 4,944     $ 118     $ 19,176     $ (8,840 )   $ (14,984 )   $ 169,788  
Effect of change in accounting policy                                         183       (9,487 )     (9,304 )
Balances at January 1, 2018, restated     160,441       174,436     $ 14,114     $ 4,944     $ 118     $ 19,176     $ (8,657 )   $ (24,471 )   $ 160,484  
Private placement     17,581       27,803       2,964                   2,964                   30,767  
Shares issued for debt settlement     148       207                                           207  
Share issuance costs           (1,777 )                                         (1,777 )
Warrants exercised     388       64       (18 )                 (18 )                 46  
Stock options exercised     657       333             (197 )           (197 )                 136  
Share based payments expensed                       2,462       457       2,919                   2,919  
Loss for the period                                               (21,393 )     (21,393 )
Other comprehensive income                                         4,456             4,456  
Balance at September 30, 2018     179,215     $ 201,066     $ 17,060     $ 7,209     $ 575     $ 24,844     $ (4,201 )   $ (45,864 )   $ 175,845  
                                                                         
Balance at January 1, 2019     179,315     $ 201,077     $ 17,026     $ 8,020     $ 914     $ 25,960     $ 4,797     $ (54,384 )   $ 177,450  
Shares issued for Monitor agreement     59       65                                           65  
Warrants exercised     6,167       5,866       (2,042 )                 (2,042 )                 3,824  
Warrants issued           (1,940 )     1,940                   1,940                    
Stock options exercised     338       897             (434 )           (434 )                 463  
Share issuance costs           (128 )                                         (128 )
RSUs matured and redeemed     202       222                   (222 )     (222 )                  
Share based payments expensed                       1,662       1,256       2,918                   2,918  
Loss for the period                                               (22,602 )     (22,602 )
Other comprehensive loss                                         (4,805 )           (4,805 )
Balance at September 30, 2019     186,081     $ 206,059     $ 16,924     $ 9,248     $ 1,948     $ 28,120     $ (8 )   $ (76,986 )   $ 157,185  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION AND CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS

 

Orla Mining Ltd. was incorporated in Alberta in 2007 and has been continued as a federal company under the Canada Business Corporations Act since 2016. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. The registered office of the Company is located at Suite 202, 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada.

 

The Company is engaged in the exploration, development, and acquisition of mineral properties, and holds two material gold projects – the Camino Rojo oxide gold and silver project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama.

 

These unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. Different bases of measurement may be appropriate if the Company is not expected to continue operations for the foreseeable future. As at September 30, 2019, the Company had not advanced any of its properties to commercial production and was not able to fund day-to-day activities through operations. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon successful results from our mineral exploration activities and our ability to attain profitable operations and generate cash or raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations. We expect to fund operating costs of the Company over the next twelve months with cash on hand and with further equity or debt financings.

 

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION

 

We have prepared these condensed interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with IAS 34 «Interim Financial Reporting». They do not include all the information required for full annual financial statements.

 

The Board of Directors approved these condensed interim consolidated financial statements for issue, on November 12, 2019.

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

These condensed interim consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

We applied the same accounting policies in these condensed interim consolidated financial statements as those applied in the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

In preparing these condensed interim consolidated financial statements, the significant judgements we made in applying the Company’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those that applied to the annual consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

You should read these condensed interim consolidated financial statements in conjunction with the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

4. CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES DURING THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 WHICH EFFECT THE COMPARATIVE FIGURES

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we changed certain of our accounting policies. Consequently, we restated the figures presented for the comparative period (namely, the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018). A discussion of the quantitative changes respecting the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 are presented in this note below. For a qualitative discussion of these changes in accounting policies we refer you to note 3(a) of our annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

(i) Exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) expenditures

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to capitalize exploration and evaluation expenditures. In preparation for the possible construction and operation of our mineral projects, we updated our policy with respect to such expenditures. The new policy is to expense such expenditures as incurred.

 

(ii) Site-related administrative costs

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to include site-related administrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel within “general and administrative expenses”. The new policy is to present these costs within exploration expenditures.

 

(iii) Site-related VAT recoverable amounts

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to include site-related value-added taxes (“VAT”) recoverable, such as Mexican IVA, within “exploration and evaluation assets”. The new policy is to present these amounts as receivables, with appropriate current and long term classification. The IVA paid upon the initial acquisition of the Camino Rojo Project continues to be carried as part of acquisition costs.

 

(iv) Corporate administrative costs

 

As a result of the reclassifications in note (ii) above, corporate “rent”, “public and community relations”, and “travel” were trivial. Consequently, we grouped them within “office and administrative” expenses.

 

(v) Effects of these changes in accounting policies

 

The effects of the above changes on the results of operations and cash flows are presented here:

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

    Three months ended
September 30, 2018
    Nine months ended
September 30, 2018
 
Effect on income statement of changes in accounting policies                
Exploration and evaluation expenses (“E&E”):                
As originally presented   $ 45     $ 91  
E&E charged to expenses, note (i)     6,997       16,689  
As restated   $ 7,042     $ 16,780  
                 
Office and administration expenses:                
As originally presented   $ 235     $ 667  
Site-related adminstrative costs reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (175 )     (499 )
Corporate public and community relations reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     30       60  
Corporate rent reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     23       50  
Corporate travel reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     31       100  
As restated   $ 144     $ 378  
                 
Professional fees:                
As originally presented   $ 289     $ 778  
Site-related professional fees reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (210 )     (361 )
As restated   $ 79     $ 417  
                 
Public and community relations:                
As originally presented   $ 125     $ 334  
Site-related public and community relations costs reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (95 )     (274 )
Corporate public and community relations reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (30 )     (60 )
As restated   $     $  
                 
Rent:                
As originally presented   $ 38     $ 95  
Site-related rent reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (15 )     (45 )
Corporate rent reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (23 )     (50 )
As restated   $     $  
                 
Salaries and benefits:                
Originally presented as management and directors’ fees   $ 434     $ 878  
Originally presented as salaries and benefits     178       456  
As originally presented, combined     612       1,334  
Site-related salaries and benefits reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (190 )     (448 )
As restated   $ 422     $ 886  
                 
Travel:                
As originally presented   $ 77     $ 226  
Site-related travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (46 )     (126 )
Corporate travel reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (31 )     (100 )
As restated   $     $  
                 
Effect on cash flow statement of changes in accounting policies                
                 
Cash used in operating activities:                
As originally presented   $ (1,370 )   $ (2,962 )
Site-related adminstrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     730       1,752  
E&E charged to expenses, note (i)     (6,997 )     (16,689 )
Portion of loan proceeds credited to exploration expense, note (i)     (766 )     (2,585 )
As restated   $ (8,403 )   $ (20,484 )
                 
Cash used in investing activities:                
As originally presented   $ (7,383 )   $ (18,208 )
Site-related adminstrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (730 )     (1,751 )
E&E (excluding depreciation) charged to expenses, note (i)     6,997       16,689  
Portion of loan proceeds credited to exploration expense, note (i)     766       2,585  
As restated   $ (350 )   $ (685 )

 

There were no changes in cash flows provided by financing activities.

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

5. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION

 

The Company’s exploration and evaluation projects consist of the Camino Rojo Project, the Cerro Quema Project, and the Monitor Gold Project.

 

(a) Camino Rojo Project

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Goldcorp Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine and consists of eight concessions covering in aggregate approximately 206,000 hectares. As currently understood, Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with exploration potential.

 

In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc. (a predecessor company to Newmont) by:

 

· issuing 31,860,141 common shares of Orla,
· granting a 2% net smelter royalty (the “Royalty”) on the sale of all metal production from Camino Rojo, and
· paying certain obligations, including Mexican value-added taxes, of approximately $4,923,000.

 

In addition, the Company and Goldcorp (now, Newmont) entered into an option agreement regarding the potential development of sulphide operations at Camino Rojo. Pursuant to the option agreement, Newmont will, subject to the applicable sulphide project meeting certain thresholds, have an option to acquire a 60% or 70% interest in the applicable sulphide project. The Royalty excludes revenue on the sale of metals produced from a sulphide project where Newmont has exercised its Sulphide Option.

 

We maintain a right of first refusal if Newmont elects to sell the Royalty, in whole or in part.

 

(b) Cerro Quema Project

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open pit mine with process by heap leaching.

 

In December 2016, we acquired 100% of the Cerro Quema Project by acquiring Pershimco Resources Inc. through the issuance of a combination of Orla common shares and warrants, and the assumption of Pershimco’s long term debt, which we subsequently paid off. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the current mineral resource areas, proposed mine development areas, and priority drill target areas.

 

The original 20-year terms for these concessions expired in February and March of 2017. The Company has applied for the prescribed ten-year extension to these concessions as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. In March 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications had been received and that exploration work could continue while the Company awaits renewal of the concessions. As of the date of these financial statements, final concession renewals have not been received. However, we continue to receive ongoing drilling, water use, environmental and other permits, and have paid concession taxes, in the normal course.

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(c) Monitor Gold Project

 

The Monitor Gold Project consists of three separate option agreements consisting of 422 claims covering 3,416 hectares in Nye County, Nevada, USA.

 

To maintain the options, minimum payments and work commitments are required for each year to 2038. In 2019, these consist of US$50,000 in share issuances (completed in January 2019), US$20,000 in advance royalty payments (completed in March 2019), and US$30,000 in work commitments (completed). For 2020, these payments and work commitments consist of US$40,000 in advance royalty payments, and US$75,000 in work commitments. We expense these property options payments and work commitments as they are incurred.

 

(d) Exploration and evaluation assets

 

Capitalized initial acquisition costs of our active mineral properties are as follows:

 

    Camino Rojo
(Mexico)
    Cerro Quema
(Panama)
    Monitor Gold
(USA)
    Other     Total  
Acquisition costs at historical rates                                        
At December 31, 2018   $ 54,258     $ 109,474     $ 407     $     $ 164,139  
Additions                              
At September 30, 2019   $ 54,258     $ 109,474     $ 407     $     $ 164,139  
                                         
Accumulated foreign exchange on translation                                        
At December 31, 2018   $ 2,145     $ 2,976     $ 22     $     $ 5,143  
Due to changes in exchange rates     (1,868 )     (3,289 )     (13 )           (5,170 )
At September 30, 2019   $ 277     $ (313 )   $ 9     $     $ (27 )
                                         
Acquisition costs                                        
At December 31, 2018   $ 56,403     $ 112,450     $ 429     $     $ 169,282  
At September 30, 2019   $ 54,535     $ 109,161     $ 416     $     $ 164,112  

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(e) Exploration and evaluation expense

 

Three months ended
   September 30, 2019
  Camino Rojo
(Mexico)
    Cerro Quema
(Panama)
    Monitor Gold
(USA)
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 36     $ 18     $     $     $ 54  
Drilling     380       6                   386  
Geological and geophysical     332       38       8             378  
Engineering     246       5                   251  
Environmental     175       108                   283  
Community and government     1,204       196                   1,400  
Land, water use, and claims     1,003       108       106             1,217  
Project management     50                         50  
Project review                       35       35  
Site activities     491       10                   501  
Site administration     59       170                   229  
    $ 3,976     $ 659     $ 114     $ 35     $ 4,784  

 

Nine months ended
   September 30, 2019
  Camino Rojo
(Mexico)
    Cerro Quema
(Panama)
    Monitor Gold
(USA)
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 164     $ 49     $     $     $ 213  
Drilling     1,352       6                   1,358  
Geological and geophysical     1,005       627       43             1,675  
Engineering     1,988       5                   1,993  
Environmental     598       108                   706  
Community and government     1,482       385                   1,867  
Land, water use, and claims     3,983       111       208             4,302  
Project management     174                         174  
Project review                       153       153  
Site activities     1,064       618                   1,682  
Site administration     469       1,208       2             1,679  
    $ 12,279     $ 3,117     $ 253     $ 153     $ 15,802  

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Three months ended
   September 30, 2018
(restated)
  Camino Rojo
(Mexico)
    Cerro Quema
(Panama)
    Monitor Gold
(USA)
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 195     $ 186     $     $     $ 381  
Drilling     828       292                   1120  
Geological and geophysical     309       466       214             989  
Engineering     172                         172  
Environmental     131                         131  
Community and government     76       210                   286  
Land, water use, and claims     2,068             86             2,154  
Project management     63                         63  
Project review                       48       48  
Site activities     496       326       53             875  
Site administration     151       672                   823  
    $ 4,489     $ 2,152     $ 353     $ 48     $ 7,042  

 

Nine months ended
   September 30, 2018

(restated)
  Camino Rojo
(Mexico)
    Cerro Quema
(Panama)
    Monitor Gold
(USA)
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 394     $ 464     $     $     $ 858  
Drilling     1,167       1,098                   2,265  
Geological and geophysical     1,224       1,706       348             3,278  
Engineering     373                         373  
Environmental     222                         222  
Community and government     121       688                   809  
Land, water use, and claims     4,086             126             4,212  
Project management     170                         170  
Project review                       124       124  
Site activities     1,198       1,162       68             2,428  
Site administration     312       1,729                   2,041  
    $ 9,267     $ 6,847     $ 542     $ 124     $ 16,780  

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

6. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT

 

    Right-of-use assets: facilities     Equipment     Office equipment     Computer equipment     Vehicles     Total  
Cost                                                
At December 31, 2018   $     $ 427     $ 44     $ 185     $ 29     $ 685  
Additions (disposals)     116       2       4       6             128  
Movements in exchange rates           (7 )     (2 )           (1 )     (10 )
At September 30, 2019   $ 116     $ 422     $ 46     $ 191     $ 28     $ 803  
                                                 
Accumulated depreciation                                                
At December 31, 2018   $     $ 207     $ 17     $ 101     $ 16     $ 341  
Charged in the year     15       51       3       18       9       96  
Movements in exchange rates           (2 )           1       (1 )     (2 )
At September 30, 2019   $ 15     $ 256     $ 20     $ 120     $ 24     $ 435  
                                                 
Net book value                                                
At December 31, 2018   $     $ 220     $ 27     $ 84     $ 13     $ 344  
At September 30, 2019   $ 101     $ 166     $ 26     $ 71     $ 4     $ 368  

 

7. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

 

    September 30,
2019
    December 31,
2018
 
Trade payables   $ 208     $ 1,314  
Value added taxes payable     24       27  
Payroll related liabilities     257       402  
    $ 489     $ 1,743  

 

8. LEASES

 

On May 1, 2019, we entered into a lease of approximately three years in respect of office space. Prior to this agreement, our terms were month-to-month, for which we had elected to expense as incurred.

 

Upon inception of the lease, we recognized a right-of-use asset of $116,000 with an offsetting lease liability of the same amount.

 

The lease obligation was calculated using a discount rate of 10% based on fixed payments required under the lease. We deducted initial non-refundable payments totaling $10,000 paid at inception. We expense annual operating and tax payments as incurred and include them within office and administration.

 

We depreciate the right-of-use asset on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

    September 30,
2019
    December 31,
2018
 
Current portion   $         30     $         —  
Long term portion     65        
    $ 95     $  

 

9. NEWMONT LOAN

 

    Mexican
pesos
(thousands)
    Mexican
pesos
(thousands)
    Canadian
dollars
 
    Undiscounted     Discounted     (thousands)  
At December 31, 2018     121,865       87,917     $ 6,103  
Advances received     97,601       97,601       6,742  
Advances received in excess of fair value, credited to exploration expense           (24,704 )     (1,707 )
Change in value during the period           15,502       1,071  
Foreign exchange                 (375 )
At September 30, 2019     219,466       176,316     $ 11,834  

 

Newmont (previously, Goldcorp) agreed to provide interest-free loans to the Company for all the annual landholding costs on the Camino Rojo project from November 7, 2017 until December 31, 2019. The loans are to be repaid upon declaration of commencement of commercial production of a heap leach operation at the Camino Rojo Project. No further advances in respect of this loan are expected.

 

At our option, we may repay any amounts owing to Newmont, prior to maturity, in the form of (a) a lump sum cash payment, (b) the issuance of additional common shares of the Company, or (c) a combination of cash and shares, all provided that any issuance of common shares does not result in Newmont holding more than 19.99% of the issued and outstanding number of common shares of the Company.

 

Because the loan is non-interest bearing, for accounting purposes at date of each advance, we discount the expected payments using a risk-adjusted discount rate and estimated repayment date. A rate of 14.6% was used for the advance received during the quarter. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, a weighted average discount rate of 14.9% was used for advances received during that period. Amounts received in excess of fair value on the date of the advances are credited to exploration expense.

 

10. SHARE CAPITAL

 

(a) Warrants

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we announced an Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program, the purpose of which was to encourage the early exercise of the Company’s warrants which are scheduled to expire on July 8, 2021 (the “July 2021 warrants”). Under the incentive program, holders of such warrants were entitled to receive one full new warrant (the "Incentive Warrant") if they exercised their July 2021 warrants prior to July 12, 2019. Each Incentive Warrant is exercisable into one common share of the Company at a price of $1.65 expiring June 12, 2022.

 

Page 15

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

We estimated the issuance date fair value of warrants issued at $1,940,000 using the following assumptions:

 

Strike price – $1.65, Share price on date of issuance – $1.35, Expected volatility – 45%, Expected life – 2.9 years, Canadian dollar risk free interest rate – 1.5%, Dividends – nil

 

The following summarizes information about warrants outstanding at September 30, 2019:

 

Expiry date   Exercise
price
    Outstanding,
December 31,
2018
    Issued     Exercised     Outstanding,
September 30,
2019
 
February 15, 2021   $ 2.35       8,790,600                   8,790,600  
July 8, 2021   $ 0.62       6,737,500             (6,167,500 )     570,000  
June 12, 2022   $ 1.65             5,842,500             5,842,500  
November 7, 2022   $ 1.40       3,000,000                   3,000,000  
Total number of warrants             18,528,100       5,842,500       (6,167,500 )     18,203,100  
Weighted average exercise price           $ 1.57     $ 1.65     $ 0.62     $ 1.91  

 

(b) Stock options

 

    2019     2018  
Stock options outstanding   Number     Weighted
average
exercise price
    Number     Weighted
average
exercise price
 
As at January 1     9,124,005     $ 1.23       6,276,748     $ 1.13  
Granted     2,199,322       1.08       2,841,505       1.25  
Exercised     (337,500 )     1.37       (657,000 )     0.21  
Expired or cancelled                 (337,248 )     1.77  
As at September 30     10,985,827     $ 1.19       8,124,005     $ 1.23  
                                 
Vested, September 30     7,964,780     $ 1.20       4,774,677     $ 1.15  

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we estimated the grant date fair value of options granted at $1,060,000 using the following weighted average assumptions:

 

Expected volatility – 49%, Expected life – 5 years, C$ risk free interest rate – 1.5%, Dividends – nil

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we estimated the grant date fair value of options granted at $1,606,000 using the following weighted average assumptions:

 

Expected volatility – 50%, Expected life – 4.8 years, C$ risk free interest rate – 2.0%, Dividends – nil

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

The stock options outstanding at September 30, 2019, were as follows:

 

Expiry date   Exercise price     Remaining
life (years)
    Number     Number
vested
 
August 22, 2019   $ 1.39                    
October 1, 2019     1.48       0.0       66,500       66,500  
December 31, 2019     0.15       0.3       225,000       225,000  
December 31, 2019     1.25       0.3       176,991       176,991  
December 31, 2019     1.39       0.3       600,000       600,000  
November 27, 2020     0.15       1.2       550,000       550,000  
December 3, 2020     0.81       1.2       76,000       76,000  
June 23, 2022     1.39       2.7       3,465,000       3,465,000  
May 31, 2023     1.25       3.7       1,050,000       700,000  
June 27, 2023     1.25       3.7       1,427,014       938,848  
September 10, 2023     1.25       3.9       150,000       100,000  
November 13, 2023     1.30       4.1       1,000,000       333,334  
March 29, 2024     1.06       4.5       1,978,660       659,553  
May 15, 2024     1.00       4.6       117,450       39,150  
August 13, 2024     1.65       4.9       103,212       34,404  
Total number of stock options                     10,985,827       7,964,780  

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, 19,500 of the October 1, 2019 options were exercised. The remaining 47,500 expired unexercised.

 

(c) Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”)

 

          Number vesting or settling in the year  
RSUs outstanding:   Number     2019     2020     2021     2022  
Outstanding, January 1, 2019     368,000       202,667       82,667       82,666        
Settled     (202,667 )     (202,667 )                  
Awarded     849,639             283,214       283,214       283,211  
Outstanding, September 30, 2019     1,014,972             365,881       365,880       283,211  

 

(d) Deferred Share Units (“DSUs”)

 

DSUs outstanding:   Number  
Outstanding, January 1, 2019     180,000  
Awarded     328,780  
Outstanding, September 30, 2019     508,780  

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(e) Bonus shares

 

(i) Non-executive Chairman bonus shares

 

During 2017, the Board of Directors awarded 500,000 common shares to the non-executive Chairman of the Company as bonus shares. The bonus shares are subject to a vesting period from June 19, 2017 to June 18, 2020 (the “Eligibility Period”). If the non-executive Chairman ceases to be the director of the Company before the Eligibility Period ends, the bonus shares will be forfeited. The bonus shares will become issuable (1) after the Eligibility Period on the date that the non-executive Chairman ceases to act as a director of the Company, or (2) upon a change of control of the Company.

 

We estimated the fair value of the bonus shares ($655,000) based on the market price of the common shares at the date of Board approval. Accordingly, we are recognizing this award date fair value in share-based payments expense on a straight-line basis over the Eligibility Period.

 

(ii) Chief Executive Officer bonus shares

 

On November 13, 2018, the Board of Directors awarded 1,000,000 bonus shares to the incoming Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The bonus shares vest in four tranches of 250,000 bonus shares each, issuable upon the achievement of certain share price thresholds particular to each tranche. We estimated that these market condition tranches would vest in various periods from December 2019 to March 2022. Accordingly, we are recognizing the award date fair value ($537,000) in share payments expense over these periods.

 

11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company’s related parties include:

 

Related party   Nature of the relationship
     
Key management personnel (“KMP”)   Key management personnel are the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and members of the Board of Directors of the Company.
     
Quantum Advisory Partners LLP (“Quantum”)  

Registered limited liability partnership, of which Paul Robertson, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is an incorporated partner.

 

The Company did not employ Mr. Robertson directly, and he provided services as Chief Financial Officer pursuant to a professional services agreement with Quantum.

 

Besides providing the services of Mr. Robertson, Quantum provided bookkeeping and accounting services to the Company at agreed monthly quantities and rates, with additional charges for excess usage. Pricing is at normal commercial terms, with prices negotiated annually.

 

Quantum ceased to be a related party on April 30, 2018.

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(a) Key Management Personnel

 

Compensation to key management personnel was as follows:

 

    Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
    2019     2018     2019     2018  
Short term incentive plans                                
      Salaries, management fees, consulting fees   $ 412     $ 392     $ 1,256     $ 750  
      Directors’ fees     59       43       151       128  
      471       435       1,407       878  
Share based payments     695       959       2,394       2,695  
Total   $ 1,166     $ 1,394     $ 3,801     $ 3,573  

 

The Company has agreed to making severance payments amounting to approximately $3,300,000 (December 31, 2018 – $3,225,000) to certain officers and management in the event of a change in control. As the likelihood of these events taking place is not determinable, we have not reflected such amounts in these financial statements.

 

(b) Transactions

 

Compensation to key management personnel, above, includes the following:

 

    Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
    2019     2018     2019     2018  
Quantum – management services   $     $     $     $ 71  

 

The Company had no other material transactions with related parties other than key management personnel during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

 

(c) Outstanding balances at the Reporting Date

 

No related party amounts were receivable or payable at September 30, 2019 (December 31, 2018 – $nil).

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

12. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

The non-cash investing and financing activities of the Company include the following:

 

    Three months ended
September 30
    Nine months ended
September 30
 
    2019     2018     2019     2018  
Shares issued for debt settlement   $          —     $          —     $          —     $          207  
Exercise of stock options, credited to shared capital with an offset to reserves     434       197       434       197  
Exercise of warrants, credited to share capital with an offset to reserves     1,856             2,042       18  
Issuance of warrants, charged to share capital with an offset to reserves     1,940             1,940        
Issuance of common shares upon maturity of RSUs, credited to share capital with an offset to reserves     7             222        
Initial recognition of right of use asset with an offset to lease liability                 106        

 

13. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

(a) Reportable segments

 

The operating segments of the Company are based on the reports which the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) reviews in making strategic resource allocation decisions. These operating segments are the Panamanian projects, the Mexican projects, and the corporate office. The projects are each managed by a dedicated General Manager and management team. Additionally, the corporate office oversees the plans and activities of early stage exploration projects, such as the Monitor Gold project.

 

None of these segments as yet generate revenue from external customers, and each of the projects are focused on the exploration and evaluation of mineral properties.

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Geographic segments

 

We conduct our activities in four geographic areas: Mexico, Panama, the United States, and Canada.

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At September 30, 2019                                        
Restricted cash   $     $ 596     $     $ 69     $ 665  
Property, plant, and equipment     178       55             135       368  
Exploration and evaluation assets     54,535       109,161       416             164,112  
                                         
At December 31, 2018                                        
Restricted cash   $     $ 205     $     $     $ 205  
Property, plant, and equipment     193       117             34       344  
Exploration and evaluation assets     56,403       112,450       429             169,282  

 

Details of exploration and evaluation expenses by geographic segment are presented in note 5(d) above.

 

14. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

 

Our objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the exploration and evaluation of our mineral properties and to maintain a flexible capital structure. In the management of capital, we include long term loans and share capital.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, there were no changes to our policy for capital management during the year.

 

We manage our capital structure and make adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the Company’s capital structure, we may issue new shares, acquire or dispose of assets, issue debt, or adjust the amount of cash and short-term investments. In order to maximize ongoing development efforts, we do not currently pay dividends. The Company and its subsidiaries are not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.

 

Loan advances from Newmont are typically used within a few weeks of receipt to pay land holding costs pursuant to the agreement governing these advances.

 

Our investment policy is to invest the Company’s excess cash in low risk financial instruments such as term deposits and higher yield savings accounts with major Canadian banks. By using this strategy, the Company preserves its cash resources and is able to marginally increase these resources through the yields on these investments. Our financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks, which include currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk.

 

Our ability to carry out our long-range strategic objectives in future years depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing exploration and development activities.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

(a) Fair value hierarchy

 

To provide an indication of the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, we classify our financial instruments into the three levels prescribed by the accounting standards.

 

Level 1 The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded equity securities) is based on quoted (unadjusted) market prices as at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Company is the closing trading price on the reporting date. Such instruments are included in Level 1.

 

Level 2 The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, we include that instrument in Level 2.

 

Level 3 If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3. We have no financial assets or liabilities included in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

 

At September 30, 2019, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying
value
    Quoted
prices in
active market
for identical
assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                            
Cash   FVTPL   $ 5,133     $ 5,133     $     $          —     $ 5,133  
Restricted cash   FVTPL     466       466                   466  
Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     48             48             48  
Reclamation deposits   Amortized cost     199             199             199  
        $ 5,846       5,599     $ 247     $     $ 5,846  
                                             
Financial liabilities                                            
Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 208     $     $ 208     $     $ 208  
Lease obligations   Amortized cost     95             95             95  
Newmont loan   Amortized cost     11,834             11,834             11,834  
        $ 12,137     $     $ 12,137     $     $ 12,137  

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

At December 31, 2018, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying
value
    Quoted
prices in
active market
for identical
assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                            
Cash   FVTPL   $ 16,686     $ 16,686     $     $              —     $ 16,686  
Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     385             385             385  
Reclamation deposits   Amortized cost     205             205             205  
        $ 17,276       16,686     $ 590     $     $ 17,276  
                                             
Financial liabilities                                            
Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 1,341     $     $ 1,341     $     $ 1,341  
Newmont loan   Amortized cost     6,103             6,103             6,103  
        $ 7,444     $     $ 7,444     $     $ 7,444  

 

Our policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the reporting period. As at September 30, 2019, we had no financial assets or financial liabilities which we measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

 

(b) Financial Risk Management

 

(i) Credit risk

 

Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to financial instruments fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company’s exposure to credit risk is limited to cash and reclamation deposits.

 

Our cash is held at large Canadian financial institutions in interest bearing accounts. Our reclamation deposits are held with large banks in the countries where the authorities have required such deposits. We believe that the credit risk related to our cash and reclamation deposits is negligible.

 

Our accounts receivable primarily consist of advances to employees, vendors and suppliers and may be subject to notable credit and performance risk; however, these balances are not material.

 

The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk is the carrying value of cash, accounts receivable, and reclamation deposits.

 

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(ii) Liquidity risk

 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with its financial liabilities.

 

At September 30, 2019, our financial liabilities had expected maturity dates as follows:

 

    Fair value     Total
contractual
cash flows
    Less than
3 months
    Between
3 months and
1 year
    Between
1 year and
3 years
    More than
3 years
 
Trade payables   $ 208     $ 208     $         208     $         —     $     $         —  
Lease obligations     95       109       10       31       68        
Newmont loan     11,834       14,731                   14,731        
    $ 12,137     $ 15,048     $ 218     $ 31     $ 14,799     $  

 

We manage liquidity by anticipating and maintaining adequate cash balances to meet liabilities as they become due. We review cash forecasts on a regular basis to determine whether the Company will have sufficient cash to meet future working capital needs.

 

(iii) Market risk

 

Market risk is the risk that the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments will fluctuate due to changes in market prices. The significant market risks to which the Company’s financial instruments are exposed are currency risk and interest rate risk.

 

(A) Currency risk

 

The Company is exposed to currency risk to the extent that monetary assets and liabilities held by the Company are not denominated in Canadian dollars. We have not entered into any foreign currency contracts or similar arrangements to mitigate this risk; however, we may do so in the future.

 

Our financial instruments are held in Canadian dollars (“C$”), US dollars (“US$”), and Mexican pesos (“MXN”). As such, our US- and Mexican-currency accounts and balances are subject to fluctuation against the Canadian dollar. These foreign currency financial instruments were denominated in the following currencies as at September 30, 2019:

 

Page 24

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

    US dollars
(thousands)
    Mexican pesos
(thousands)
 
Cash   US$ 776     MXN 8,558  
Restricted cash     300        
Accounts receivable     5       612  
Reclamation deposits     150        
Trade payables     (13 )     (852 )
Newmont loan           (176,316 )
Total foreign currency   US$ 1,218     MXN (167,998)  
Exchange rate     1.3243       0.0671  
Equivalent Canadian dollars   C$ 1,613     C$ (11,276)  

 

Based on the above net exposures as at September 30, 2019, and assuming all other variables remain constant:

 

· a 10% appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would decrease loss by $120,000 and
     
· a 10% appreciation of the Mexican peso against the Canadian dollar would increase loss by $2,563,000.

 

(B) Interest rate risk

 

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. Our cash and our reclamation deposits are held mainly in saving accounts and term deposits and therefore there is currently minimal interest rate risk. Because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments, fluctuations in market rates do not have a significant impact on estimated fair values compared to carrying value.

 

The Company’s interest rate risk arises principally from the changes in interest rates related to term deposits where our cash and reclamation deposits are held. A one percent change increase in interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $68,000 in the Company’s loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

 

Page 25

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

16. EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

 

(a) Project Finance Facility

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, on October 21, 2019, we entered into a Commitment Letter with a syndicate of lenders for a secured project finance facility (the “Facility”) of up to US$125 million. In connection with the Commitment Letter, certain members of the syndicate have collectively committed to provide an initial tranche of US$25 million which the Company may draw prior to final syndication, completion of definitive documentation relating to the Facility, and final receipt of required mine permits. This initial advance will allow the Company to order long lead items to maintain an efficient construction schedule.

 

Key terms of the Facility will include:

 

· Term of 5.0 years;
· Up to US$125 million, with an early drawdown option:
o US$25 million is committed and, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, will be available for drawdown prior to Closing at Orla’s option.
o Two subsequent tranches of US$50 million each, available for drawdown upon Closing and after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of key permits required for the development of Camino Rojo;
· Interest rate of 8.8% per annum;
· 32.5 million common share purchase warrants to be issued to the lenders on Closing, with an exercise price of C$3.00 per warrant, and a 7-year term;
· Principal repayment at maturity with no scheduled amortization: Orla can prepay the loan, in full or in part, at any time during the term, without penalty, with cash flow from operations;
· No mandatory hedging, production payments, offtake, streams, or royalties required.

 

Page 26

 

 

Exhibit 99.48

 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

 

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019

 

Canadian dollars

 

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

1.            Overview

 

Orla Mining Ltd. is a mineral exploration and development company which trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol OLA. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. Refer to page 26 of this document for a list of abbreviations used.

 

Our corporate strategy is to acquire and develop mineral exploration properties where our expertise can substantially increase shareholder value. We have two material gold projects with near-term production potential based on open pit mining and heap leaching – the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama.

 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 (the “financial statements”), and the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018. You can find additional information regarding the Company, including our Annual Information Form, on SEDAR under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com.

 

All monetary amounts herein are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.

 

This MD&A is current as of November 12, 2019.

 

Hans Smit, P. Geo, our Chief Operating Officer, is the Qualified Person, as the term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). He has reviewed and approved the technical information disclosed in this MD&A.

 

2.            Highlights

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2019 and to the date of this MD&A, the Company:

 

· raised $3.6 million through its Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program,

 

· filed a NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold project,

 

· submitted applications and associated documentation for permits required to start construction and operation of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project,

 

· awarded the engineering, procurement, and construction management (“EPCM”) contract for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, and

 

· executed a Commitment Letter for up to US$125 million project facility for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project.

 

3.            Discussion of Operations

 

A.           Camino Rojo, Mexico

 

 

Project Description and History

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Goldcorp Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine and consists of eight concessions covering in aggregate approximately 206,000 hectares. In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc. (“Goldcorp”, a predecessor company to Newmont). As currently understood, Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with exploration potential.

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Canplats Resources Corporation (“Canplats”) initially discovered gold-silver mineralization at Camino Rojo in 2007, and they subsequently completed 39,725 metres of drilling, largely delineating the shallow oxide mineralization. Canplats also carried out metallurgical studies prior to being acquired by Goldcorp in 2010. Goldcorp then completed more than 250,000 metres of drilling, conducted airborne and ground geophysical surveys, did extensive geological and mineralogical investigations, and conducted numerous metallurgical studies, which included detailed mineralogical studies, column leach tests on oxide material, size fraction analysis, variability test work and sulphide flotation studies.

 

The Ejido San Tiburcio holds the surface rights over the main area of known mineralization. Exploration has been carried out under the authority of agreements between the project operators and the Ejido San Tiburcio. There is a temporary occupation agreement in place with the Ejido San Tiburcio, with the right to expropriate, covering all the area of the mineral resource and area of potential development described in the Camino Rojo Report. Other temporary occupation agreements allow surface access for exploration activities in various other parts of the large property. The Company has water rights in the area of the proposed development.

 

The Company has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. However, if sulphide projects are defined through one or more positive pre-feasibility studies with certain development scenarios meeting certain criteria, Newmont has an option to enter into a joint venture with Orla for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of such a sulphide project. If Newmont exercises its option, Orla’s share of the costs to develop the project can be, at Orla’s option, carried to production by Newmont. Orla has a right of first refusal on a sale if Newmont elects to sell its portion of the sulphide project, in whole or in part. The Camino Rojo Asset Purchase Agreement was filed on SEDAR on June 28, 2017. Details of the joint venture are available in our news release dated November 7, 2017, which is available here.

 

On June 24, 2019, we issued the results of a positive Feasibility Study along with a Mineral Reserve estimate on the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project. The Feasibility Study supports a technically simple open-pit mine and heap-leach operation with low capital and operating costs providing rapid payback and a strong financial return. An independent technical report prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 is available at www.sedar.com under Orla's profile. The new mineral reserve estimate at Camino Rojo includes proven and probable mineral reserves of 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne ("g/t") and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. All mineral reserves are contained and accessible from within Orla's mineral concessions.

 

Updated measured and indicated mineral resources, inclusive of mineral reserves, amount to 353.4 million tonnes at 0.83 g/t gold and 8.83 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 9.46 million ounces of gold and 100.4 million ounces of silver. Inferred mineral resources are 60.9 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold and 7.41 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 1.70 million ounces of gold and 14.5 million ounces of silver. Further details on the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates are provided below and in the technical report.

 

Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

The Camino Rojo Feasibility Study considers near-surface open pit mining of 44.0 million tonnes of oxide and transitional ore at a throughput rate of 18,000 tonnes per day. Ore from the pit will be crushed to 80% passing 28 mm, conveyor stacked onto a heap leach pad and leached using a low concentration sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant where gold and silver will be precipitated and doré will be produced. The site's proximity to infrastructure, low stripping ratio, compact footprint and flat pad location all contribute to project simplicity and relatively low estimated AISC of US$576 per ounce of gold.

 

The Feasibility Study was prepared by a team of independent industry experts led by Kappes Cassiday and Associates ("KCA") and supported by Independent Mining Consultants ("IMC"), Resource Geosciences Incorporated ("RGI"), Barranca Group LLC, Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., and HydroGeoLogica Inc (“HGL”).

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Feasibility Study incorporates geological, assay, engineering, metallurgical, geotechnical, environmental and hydrogeological information collected by Orla and previous owners since 2007, including 370,566 metres of drilling in 911 holes. Predicted average gold recoveries of 64% are based on results from 85 column tests.

 

Operating costs are based on contract mining with all other mine components being owned and operated by Orla. Capital costs were estimated primarily using budgetary supplier quotes for all major and most minor equipment as well as contractor quotes for major construction contracts.

 

The following tables presents the key assumptions and detailed results of the Feasibility Study:

 

Table 1: Summary of Key Assumptions and Economics of the Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

Production Data   Values     Units  
Life of Mine     6.8       years  
Mine Throughput     18,000       tonnes/day  
Mine Throughput     6,570,000       tonnes/year  
Total Tonnes to Crusher     44,020,000       tonnes  
Grade Au (Average)     0.73       g/t  
Grade Ag (Average)     14.2       g/t  
Contained Gold oz     1,031,000       ounces  
Contained Silver oz     20,093,000       ounces  
Metallurgical Recovery Gold (Overall)     64       %  
Metallurgical Recovery Silver (Overall)     17       %  
Average Annual Gold Production     97,000       ounces  
Average Annual Silver Production     511,000       ounces  
Total Gold Produced     662,000       ounces  
Total Silver Produced     3,479,000       ounces  
LOM Strip Ratio     0.54        waste:ore  

 

Operating Costs (Average LOM)                
Mining (mined)   US$ 2.14       /tonne mined  
Mining (processed)   US$ 3.30       /tonne processed  
Processing & Support   US$ 3.38       /tonne processed  
G&A   US$ 1.75       /tonne processed  
Total Operating Cost   US$ 8.43       /tonne processed  
By-Product Cash Cost   US$ 515       /ounce Au  
All-in Sustaining Cost   US$ 576       /ounce Au  

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Capital Costs (excluding value added tax)                
Initial Capital   US$ 123       million  
LOM Sustaining Capital   US$ 20       million  
LOM Capital   US$ 144       million  
Working Capital and Initial Fills   US$ 10       million  
Closure Costs   US$ 20       million  

 

Financial Analysis              
Gold Price Assumption   US$ 1,250     /ounce  
Silver Price Assumption   US$ 17     /ounce  
Average Annual Cashflow (Pre-Tax)   US$ 72     million  
Average Annual Cashflow (After-Tax)   US$ 56     million  
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pre-Tax   38.6 %     %  
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax   28.7 %     %  
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax)   US$ 227       million  
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax)   US$ 142       million  
Pay-Back Period (After-Tax)     3.0       years  

 

Note: See reference below regarding non-GAAP metrics. Feasibility Study economics include a 2% royalty and use a USD:MXN exchange rate of 19.3

 

The proposed mine is located 3 kilometres from a paved 4-lane highway and approximately 190 kilometres from the city of Zacatecas. The area is flat and there are no known social or environmental impediments to mining. Orla has all surface, mineral and water rights to develop the project as presented in the Feasibility Study and existing wells produce in excess of the average 24 litres per second of water required for the project.

 

There are no residents within the area of proposed development. The town of San Tiburcio is located 4 kilometres to the east of the proposed development. Orla has a Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement with the Ejido San Tiburcio and a 30-year temporary occupation right with an expropriation right over the 2,497 hectares covering the proposed pit and infrastructure area. Orla has an active community and social program in San Tiburcio and other nearby communities of El Berrendo and San Francisco.

 

We expect to commence construction of the Camino Rojo Oxide Project in the first half of 2020 upon receipt of all required permits and project financing. First gold production is planned for mid-2021.

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Sensitivity to Gold Price

 

Table 2: Project Economics Sensitivities to Gold Price

 

Gold Price (US$/oz) US$ 1,150 US$ 1,200 US$ 1,250 US$ 1,300 US$ 1,350 US$ 1,400
After-tax NPV 5% (US$ millions) US$ 109 US$ 125 US$ 142 US$ 158 US$ 174 US$ 190
After-tax IRR (%) 24.0% 26.4% 28.7% 31.0% 33.2% 35.4%
Payback (years) 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.6

 

Opportunities

 

The mine plan in the Feasibility Study was developed entirely on Orla's mineral concessions and constrained by the property boundary with no impact to land outside Orla’s mineral concessions. An agreement with the owner of the concession bordering Orla's to the north would allow for the open pit to extend onto the adjacent concession. Such agreement would result in an expanded pit with access to additional oxide and transitional material below the feasibility study pit, which would add to the mine life and/or annual throughput with only modest equipment and infrastructure additions. Orla remains optimistic that an agreement can be reached with the owner of the adjacent concession.

 

The Feasibility Study only considers oxide and transitional material as testing shows gold cannot be economically recovered by the heap leach method from sulphide material. Orla is actively working on studies to investigate economic opportunities that may exist within the 7.3 million ounces of gold contained within the sulphide measured and indicated mineral resources.

 

Orla has title to mineral concessions covering a very large area around the Camino Rojo deposit. Overburden makes exploration challenging, but the discovery in 2007 of mineralization that is incorporated into this Feasibility Study and mineral resource estimate shows that shallow cover can hide very large near-surface deposits. Orla has been trying various exploration techniques and Induced Polarization ("IP") geophysics appears to be the most useful tool. A large area southeast of the current mineral resource has recently been surveyed and drilling on the anomalies identified is expected to start within the next two months. Additional oxide material in the vicinity of the planned development would leverage the infrastructure being proposed in the Feasibility Study. Any additional sulphide material could add to the long-term potential of the property.

 

Permitting

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by the federal government department known as SEMARNAT, which has authority over the two principal permits: (1) the Environmental Impact Statement (Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental or MIA, accompanied by a Risk Study), and (2) a Change of Land Use permit accompanied by a Technical Justification Study or ETJ.

 

In early 2018, Orla resumed environmental assessment activities on the project and surrounding area under the guidance of independent environmental permitting consultant Patricia Aguayo. Data from this work has been used in conjunction with information collected by previous operators and project information from Orla's consulting engineers to prepare the documents needed to apply for the MIA and Change of Land Use permits. Permitting documents were submitted to SEMARNAT during the third quarter of 2019.

 

The project is not located in an area with any special federal environmental protection designation and no factors have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required environmental permits. The legislated timelines for the review of properly prepared MIA and Change of Land Use applications and mine operating permits for a project that does not affect federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves are 120 working days and 105 working days, respectively, which can be completed concurrently.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Orla has contracted ERM, a global consulting company, to review the environmental assessment and proposed mitigation measures for the project. We plan to complete this work in accordance with International Finance Corporation Performance Standards, as well as the International Council on Mining and Metals principles.

 

Next Steps

 

Now that permit applications have been submitted, we are focused on the detailed engineering and planning required to start construction in 2020. In September 2019, we awarded the engineering, procurement, and construction management (“EPCM”) contract for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project to M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation (“M3”), a full service EPCM firm headquartered in Tucson, Arizona.

 

Project Finance Facility

 

On October 21, 2019, we announced the execution of a Commitment Letter with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) for a project debt facility of up to US$125 million for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project (the “Project Finance Facility”). The Project Finance Facility is being arranged by Trinity Capital and will include a syndicate of lenders led by Pierre Lassonde, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”) and Trinity Capital, creating key alignment between debt and equity holders that will support the Company’s development going forward. In connection with the Commitment Letter, Mr. Lassonde, Agnico Eagle and Trinity Capital have collectively committed to provide an initial tranche of an aggregate of US$25 million, which Orla may draw, at its option, prior to final syndication and completion of definitive documentation relating to the Project Finance Facility and prior to final receipt of required mine permits. This initial advance will provide Orla with the flexibility to order long lead items and maintain an efficient construction schedule. The balance of the Project Finance Facility will be available subject to the completion of definitive documentation, the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent and syndication (“Closing”), which is being arranged by Trinity Capital.

 

Key terms of the Project Finance Facility will include:

 

· Term of 5.0 years.
· Up to US$125 million, with an early drawdown option:
o US$25 million is committed and, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, will be available for drawdown prior to Closing at Orla’s option.
o Two subsequent tranches of US$50 million each, available for drawdown upon Closing and after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of key permits required for the development of Camino Rojo.
· Interest rate of 8.8% per annum.
· 32.5 million common share purchase warrants to be issued to the lenders on Closing, with an exercise price of C$3.00 per warrant, representing a 97% premium to the closing price of Orla on October 18, 2019, and a 7-year term.
· Principal repayment at maturity with no scheduled amortization: Orla can prepay the loan, in full or in part, at any time during the term, without penalty, with cash flow from operations.
· No mandatory hedging, production payments, offtake, streams, or royalties are required.

  

The Project Finance Facility will include standard and customary project finance terms and conditions with respect to fees and conditions precedent to Closing (including satisfaction of remaining customary due diligence and other approvals) and remains subject to the completion and execution of definitive loan documentation. The issuance of securities under the terms of the Project Finance Facility is subject to regulatory approvals. Closing of the transaction is expected during the fourth quarter of 2019.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Mineral Reserves

 

Camino Rojo comprises intrusive related, sedimentary strata hosted, polymetallic gold, silver, arsenic, zinc, and lead mineralization. The mineralized zones correspond to zones of sheeted sulphidic veins and veinlet networks, creating a bulk-mineable style of gold mineralization. Mineralization is almost completely oxidized to a depth of approximately 120 metres and then variably oxidized below (transitional to sulphide). The mineral resource estimate was divided into oxide, high and low transitional, and sulphide material. Only the oxide and transitional material were considered in the Feasibility Study for heap leach extraction.

 

The mineral reserve estimate for Camino Rojo is based on an open pit mine plan and mine production schedule developed by IMC. All mineral reserves are located on, and are accessible from, Orla's concessions and support the 6.8-year mine life.

 

The following table presents the initial mineral reserve estimation for the Camino Rojo Oxide Project. Proven and probable mineral reserves amount to 44.0 million tonnes at 0.73 g/t gold and 14.2 g/t silver for 1.03 million contained gold ounces and 20.1 million contained silver ounces. The mineral reserve was estimated based on a gold price of US$1,250 per ounce and a silver price of US$17.00 per ounce. Measured mineral resource in the mine production schedule was converted to proven mineral reserve and indicated mineral resource in the schedule was converted to probable mineral reserve.

 

Table 3: Camino Rojo Mineral Reserves

 

Reserve Class   000's tonnes     Gold (g/t)     Silver (g/t)     Gold (koz)     Silver (koz)  
Proven Mineral Reserve     14,595       0.79       15.1       369.7       7,104  
Probable Mineral Reserve     29,424       0.70       13.7       661.1       12,991  
Total Proven & Probable Reserve     44,019       0.73       14.2       1,031.0       20,095  
     
Notes:
1. The mineral reserve estimate has an effective date of June 24, 2019. Mineral reserves are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council (as amended) in accordance with the disclosure requirement of NI 43-101
2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding
3. Mineral reserves are based on prices of US$1,250/oz gold, US$17/oz silver, USD/MXN exchange rate of 19.3
4. Mineral reserves are based on net smelter return cut-off that vary by time period to balance mine and plant production capacities. They range from a low of US$4.73/t to a high of US$9.00/t
5. Operating costs — mining US$1.94/t mined; process US$3.41/t processed; G&A US$1.32/t processed, includes a 2% royalty
6. Recoveries for gold — Kp 70%, Ki 56%, Transition Hi 60%; Transition Lo 40%; Recoveries for silver — Kp 11%, Ki 15%, TrHi 27%, TrLo 34%7.
7. Gold and silver 100% payable; Refining cost per ounce — Au US$5.00; Ag US$0.50/oz

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Mineral Resources

 

As part of the Feasibility Study efforts, IMC updated the mineral resource estimate from the previous estimate prepared as of April 27, 2018 and previously reported in Orla's May 29, 2018 news release. Mineral resources were divided between oxide and transitional material that could possibly be extracted by open pit mine and processed in a heap leach operation ("Leach Resource") and sulphide material that could possibly be extracted by open pit and processed in a mill ("Mill Resource"). For the Mill Resource, estimates were made for contained gold, silver, lead and zinc. As lead and zinc would not be recovered in a heap leach operation, only gold and silver were estimated for the Leach Resource.

 

Table 4: Mineral Resource Estimate — Gold & Silver

 

Resource Type   000's tonnes     Gold
(g/t)
    Silver
(g/t)
    Gold
(koz)
    Silver
(koz)
 
Leach Resource   Measured Mineral Resource     19,391       0.77       14.9       482.3       9,305  
  Indicated Mineral Resource     75,249       0.70       12.2       1,680.7       29,471  
  Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     94,640       0.71       12.7       2,163.0       38,776  
  Inferred Mineral Resource     4,355       0.86       5.6       119.8       805  
                                         
Mill Resource   Measured Mineral Resource     3,358       0.69       9.2       74.2       997  
  Indicated Mineral Resource     255,445       0.88       7.4       7,221.4       60,606  
  Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     258,803       0.88       7.4       7,295.6       61,603  
  Inferred Mineral Resource     56,564       0.87       7.5       1,576.9       13,713  
                                           
Total Mineral Resource   Measured Mineral Resource     22,749       0.76       14.1       556.5       10,302  
  Indicated Mineral Resource     330,694       0.84       8.5       8,902.1       90,078  
  Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     353,443       0.83       8.8       9,458.6       100,379  
  Inferred Mineral Resource     60,919       0.87       7.4       1,696.7       14,518  

 

Table 5: Mineral Resource Estimate — Zinc & Lead

 

Resource Type   000's
tonnes
    Lead
(%)
    Zinc
(%)
    Lead
(M lbs)
    Zinc
(M lbs)
 
Mill   Measured Mineral Resource     3,358       0.13       0.38       9.3       28.2  
Resource   Indicated Mineral Resource     255,445       0.07       0.26       404.3       1,468.7  
  Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     258,803       0.07       0.26       413.6       1,496.8  
  Inferred Mineral Resource     56,564       0.05       0.23       63.1       290.4  
     
Notes:
1. The mineral resource has an effective date of June 7, 2019. The mineral resources are classified in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards in accordance with the disclosure requirement of NI 43-101
2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding
3. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability
4. Mineral resources for leach material are based on prices of US$1,400/oz gold and US$20/oz silver
5. Mineral resources for mill material are based on prices of US$1,400/oz gold, US$20/oz silver, US$1.05/lb lead, and US$1.20/lb zinc
6. Mineral resources are based on net smelter return cut-off of US$4.73/t for leach material and US$13.71/t for mill material
7. Includes 2% royalty and an USD:MXN exchange rate of 19.3
8. Operating costs for Leach resource — mining US$1.65/t mined; process US$3.41/t processed; G&A US$1.32/t processed; Operating costs for Mill resource — mining US$1.65/t mined; process US$12.50/t processed; G&A US$1.20/t processed
9. Leach resource payable — Au 100%; Ag 100%;
Mill resource payable — Au 95%, Ag 95%, Pb 95%, Zn 85%
10. Leach resource refining costs — Au US$5.00/oz; Ag US$0.50/oz; Mill resource refining costs — Au US$1.00/oz; Ag US$1.50/oz; Pb US$0.194/lb; Zn US$0.219/lb
11. The mineral resource estimate assumes that the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto land held by the adjacent owner. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the adjacent owner
12. Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves
13. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an indicated mineral resource and must not be converted to a mineral reserve.

 

It is reasonably expected that the majority of inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated mineral resources with continued exploration.

 

All the mineralization comprised in the mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate "reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction" extends onto lands where mineral title is held by an adjacent owner and that waste would be mined on the adjacent owner's mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that would include an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate (oxide and sulphide material) would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with that property owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the adjacent property owner. Delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Orla intends to seek an agreement with the adjacent owner, to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. We cannot give any assurance that we will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. The development scenario presented in the Feasibility Study, including the mineral reserve estimate, does not require a layback agreement with the adjacent owner.

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Additional details on mineral reserve and resource assumptions, risks and data verification can be found in the independent technical report dated June 25, 2019 prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 available at www.sedar.com under Orla's profile.

 

Qualified Persons

 

The Feasibility Study was overseen by KCA of Reno, Nevada. IMC of Tucson, Arizona conducted the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates under the direction of Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM. Mr. Hester was also responsible for the mining components of the Feasibility Study. KCA, under the direction of Carl Defilippi, RM SME, was responsible for the metallurgy, process, general and administration and economic components of the Feasibility Study. Matthew Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. (AIPG), of Resource Geosciences Incorporated of Rio Rico, Arizona was responsible for the property, geology and environmental components of the Feasibility Study. David Hawkins, C.P.G. (AIPG), was responsible for the hydrogeology model. Each of Messrs. Hester, Defilippi, Gray and Hawkins is a Qualified Person for their respective sections of the Feasibility Study and each of whom is independent of Orla under the definitions of NI 43-101.

 

Non-GAAP Measures

 

The Company has included certain non-GAAP performance measures as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers and the non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to the Company.

 

Cash Costs per Ounce — we calculated cash costs per ounce by dividing the sum of operating costs, royalty costs, production taxes, refining and shipping costs, net of by-product silver credits, by payable gold ounces. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, we believe that this measure is useful to external users in assessing operating performance.

 

All-In Sustaining Costs ("AISC") — we have provided an AISC performance measure that reflects all the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, our definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. We believe that this measure is useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow from current operations.

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

June 27, 2013. We believe that this measure is useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow from current operations.

 

Other activities during the three months ended September 30, 2019, and future plans

 

Work related to completion of the feasibility study and permitting documents was the primary focus for the Camino Rojo project in the first two months of Q3 of 2019. In September, detailed engineering commenced.

 

During the quarter ended September 30, 2019, for the Camino Rojo project, we

 

· completed and filed a NI 43-101 technical report in support of the feasibility study;
· selected an EPCM contractor;
· completed environmental permit documents and submitted applications to the environmental authorities;
· commenced hiring key senior managers at site;
· started detailed engineering;
· drilled 6 wells to monitor water depth and quality for a total of 510 metres of drilling.

 

As well as development related activities, we continue to conduct a limited regional exploration program. In Q3 of 2019, 6 reverse circulation (“RC”) holes totaling 1,772 metres were drilled on a low amplitude chargeability anomaly southeast of the resource area outlined in an induced polarization (“IP”) survey completed earlier in the year. No significant alteration was encountered. The anomaly is assumed to be related to abundant groundwater encountered in the holes.

 

In Q3, we conducted a total of 97 line-km of IP in the southwest part of the property in a number of small grids centered on overburden covered areas with potential structural intercepts and indications of alteration in the general vicinity. A further 16 line-km were completed in October for a total of 113 line-km. One of the grids showed a well-defined chargeability anomaly that is roughly 1,000 by 400 metres in size. It is in an area with large structures and rock outcrops to the southeast have zones with strong silicification and weakly anomalous trace-element geochemistry. The area of the anomaly is covered by overburden. Drilling to test this anomaly is planned and permitting has been initiated to allow the work.

 

We continued our CSR activities, and during the quarter, we:

 

· completed construction of a preschool in El Berrendo;
· continued to support Adult Education programs;
· Held the 4th Introduction to Mining Course for local residents;
· supported a number of community events;
· held a cervical cancer detection clinic in coordination with the Zacatecas health authorities;
· supported the community to reactivate the construction of a local health center and in efforts to have a doctor assigned to the community.

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

B. Cerro Quema Project, Panama

 

Project Description and History

 

Our 100%-owned Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open pit mine with process by heap leaching. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the areas of the current mineral resources and mineral reserves, proposed mine development, and the priority drill targets.

 

Mineral concessions are comprised of three contracts between the Republic of Panama and Minera Cerro Quema S.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of Orla. The original 20-year term for these concessions expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). The Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications were received, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal. We have received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. A permit was received on May 8, 2018 to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018, we received two permits to use water for drilling. An existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current mineral resources was extended for two years in May 2018. In October 2018, the government accepted our 2018 concession tax payments, and in February 2019, we paid the 2019 concession tax payments. A new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions was received on February 11, 2019. All drill permits are currently active. General elections were held in Panama in May 2019, which resulted in a change in federal government effective July 1, 2019.

 

The Company owns the surface rights for land required to mine the Cerro Quema mineral reserves and to construct and operate a heap leach facility, and part of the land required for proposed upgrades to the project access road.

 

A predecessor company to Orla issued a mineral resource estimate and a Pre-Feasibility Study for Cerro Quema, and an independent technical report entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”).

 

The Cerro Quema Report envisions a standard open pit mine with two pits, one at La Pava and one at Quemita, coupled with a 10,000 tonne per day heap leach facility to extract the gold. With an average head grade of 0.77 g/t Au and a crush size of 80% passing minus 50 mm, an average gold recovery of 86% was estimated. This would result in 418,000 ounces of gold production over a 5.3-year mine life.

 

The Cerro Quema Report, which contains the 2014 mineral resource and mineral reserve estimate and Pre-Feasibility Study, was filed on SEDAR by Pershimco Resources Inc. on August 22, 2014. You can download it from SEDAR here.

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Table 6: Cerro Quema Mineral Reserves

 

Zone   Category   Cut-Off
(Au g/t)
    Tonnes (millions)     Au
(g/t)
    Au
(koz)
 
    Proven     0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
La Pava   Probable     0.21       7.40       0.67       159  
    Sub-Total     0.21       14.22       0.73       335  
    Proven     0.21                    
Quema   Probable     0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
    Sub-Total     0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
    Proven     0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
Total   Probable     0.21       12.89       0.75       312  
    Total     0.21       19.71       0.77       488  

 

Notes:
(1) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
(2) A cut-off grade of 0.21 g/t of gold is used for reporting mineral reserves.
(3) Mineral reserves are estimated at a gold price of US$1,300 per ounce.
(4) Effective as of June 30, 2014.
(5) See NI 43-101 Technical Report “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” published on August 15, 2014 for additional information. A copy of the report is available on the Company’s website and under the SEDAR profile of Pershimco Resources Inc. at www.sedar.com.

 

Activities during the three months ended September 30, 2019

 

The Company has an ongoing environmental management plan that includes maintaining sediment dams, reforestation of previously disturbed areas and active sediment control activities. Baseline surface water quality sampling and groundwater level measurements are also ongoing.

 

We have an active community relations program which includes providing hot lunches to 5 to 15-year-old children studying in the 12 schools located within a 15 kilometre radius of the Project. We also provide support for various local amateur sports teams, a youth orchestra, local fairs, and cultural events.

 

There have been no exploration activities at Cerro Quema to date in 2019 as the Company has focused its efforts at the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Future Plans

 

Company activities will continue to focus on Camino Rojo for the rest of 2019. In 2020, we plan to update the Cerro Quema Pre-Feasibility Study (“PFS”) on the oxide heap leach gold project initially completed in 2014. This will include updated mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates. In addition to the work on oxide mineralization, we will continue to advance exploration of the Caballito copper-gold sulphide discovery. This style of mineralization, identified in 2018, presents potential value to the project in addition to the current heap-leach oxide gold project. In addition to the 1.2 km long trend north of Caballito through to Quemita, the Pelona area in the eastern part of the project provides extensive target areas for additional Caballito-style mineralization.

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

C. Monitor Gold Project, Nevada

 

Option Agreements

 

The Monitor Gold Project is a grassroots project in an area where work by past operators showed extensive areas with samples anomalous in gold and other metals associated with alteration, including silicification, within carbonate rocks. Stratigraphic assemblages known to host mineral deposits elsewhere in Nevada are found in the area and there are a number of major structures which could provide conduits for mineralizing fluids. We conducted no significant work on the Monitor Gold Project in the quarter ended September 30, 2019.

 

4. Summary of Quarterly Results

 

The figures in the following table are based on the financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. The figures have been restated because of a change in accounting policy (see note 3 of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018) and are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars.

 

    2019-Q3     2019-Q2     2019-Q1     2018-Q4     2018-Q3     2018-Q2     2018-Q1     2017-Q4  
Exploration expense   $ 4,784     $ 3,515     $ 7,503     $ 6,066     $ 7,056     $ 4,438     $ 5,273     $ 3,156  
General and administrative     127       162       217       183       144       126       108       88  
Professional fees     223       148       125       176       79       202       136       46  
Regulatory and transfer agent     39       46       41       205       19       14       40       1  
Salaries and wages     556       564       550       836       422       230       234       813  
Depreciation     34       23       39       40       40       37       36       3  
Share based payments     758       907       1,253       1,065       601       1,523       796       812  
Interest income     (21 )     (30 )     (62 )     (105 )     (134 )     (117 )     (86 )     (35 )
Interest expense     2       1                                      
Foreign exchange     (1 )     11       13       (133 )     10       (146 )     (6 )     (258 )
Changes in value of Newmont loan     638       76       357       187       153       100       65       8  
Impairment of investment                                               27  
Impairment mineral properties                                               261  
Tax expense                 4                                
Net loss   $ 7,139     $ 5,423     $ 10,040     $ 8,520     $ 8,390     $ 6,407     $ 6,596     $ 4,922  
Loss per share (basic and diluted)   $ 0.04     $ 0.03     $ 0.06     $ 0.05     $ 0.05     $ 0.04     $ 0.04     $ 0.03  

 

Prior to 2018, our exploration activity almost entirely focused on Cerro Quema, as we did not acquire the Camino Rojo project until the end of 2017. In 2018, we conducted work on both Cerro Quema and Camino Rojo. To date in 2019, we continued work on, completed, and publicly filed the feasibility study for Camino Rojo. Quarterly variations are due to seasonality and timing of mining concession fees, drilling activities and awaiting results from previous quarters’ exploration activities.

 

Administrative costs have trended with the level of activity of the Company. Professional fees have trended with (a) the general activity level of the Company, and (b) major regulatory events such as financings and public listings. The increase in regulatory fees in 2018-Q4 is due to a one-time initial listing fee as the Company started trading on the TSX Exchange.

 

The increase in salaries and wages in 2017-Q4 was related to an accrual of short-term incentive (bonus) payments, as was the increase in 2018-Q3. In 2018-Q4, we accrued for payments related to the departure of the former CEO. Salaries have generally increased in 2019 as we have increased our team in preparation for the construction phase at Camino Rojo.

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Share based payments expense is generally related to the number of stock options and RSUs outstanding vesting during the quarter. The grants occurred during 2017-Q2, 2018-Q2, and 2019-Q1; consequently, those quarters tend to be greater than others as some of the vesting occurs on the date of the grant. The increase in share-based payments in 2018-Q4 was related to options and bonus shares granted to the incoming CEO.

 

Interest income is directly related to cash on hand and prevailing interest rates. From 2018-Q1, we started receiving loan advances from Goldcorp.

 

Foreign exchange gains and losses vary based on fluctuation of the Canadian dollar versus US dollar and Mexican peso amounts on hand. We tend to hold most of our funds in Canadian dollars until needed.

 

5. Third Quarter of 2019

 

The following table is based on financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Figures are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars.

 

A. Comparison to the previous quarter

 

    2019-Q3     2019-Q2     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense   $ 4,784     $ 3,515     $ 1,269    

During Q3-2019, we incurred approximately $1.8 million in semi-annual water use and concession fees payments which are due in Q1 and Q3 each year.

 

Excluding those payments, exploration expenses decreased as the Camino Rojo feasibility study had been substantially completed during Q2-2019.

General and administrative     127       162       (35 )    
Professional fees     223       148       75     Increased legal and advisory work related to the Project Finance Facility.
Regulatory and transfer agent     39       46       (7 )    
Salaries and wages     556       564       (8 )    
Depreciation     34       23       11      
Share based payments     758       907       (149 )   Higher stock option expense in Q2, partly offset by DSU grant to new director in Q3.
Interest income     (21 )     (30 )     9      
Interest expense     2       1       1      
Foreign exchange     (1 )     11       (12 )    
Changes in value of Newmont loan     638       76       562     Due to time value accretion
Loss for the quarter   $ 7,139     $ 5,423     $ 1,716      

 

Page 15

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

B. Comparison to the same quarter last year

 

    2019-Q3     2018-Q3     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense   $ 4,784     $ 7,042     $ (2,258 )   Planned decrease in activities at Cerro Quema in 2019.  Decreased spending at Camino Rojo in Q3-2019 compared to same quarter last year as a result of having substantially completed the feasibility study during Q2-2019.
Office and administrative     127       144       (17 )    
Professional fees     223       79       144     Increased legal and advisory work related to the Project Finance Facility.
Regulatory and transfer agent     39       19       20      
Salaries and wages     556       422       134     Increased staffing as we prepare for construction activities.
Depreciation     34       34            
Share based payments     758       601       157     DSUs granted to new director in Q3-2019.
Interest income     (21 )     (134 )     113     Lower cash balances on hand.
Interest expense     2             2      
Foreign exchange     (1 )     10       (11 )    
Change in value of Newmont loan     638       153       485     Larger loan balance, closer to maturity
Loss for the quarter     7,139     $ 8,370     $ (1,231 )    

 

6. Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Historically the Company's primary source of funding has been the issuance of equity securities for cash, typically through private placements to sophisticated investors and institutions. We have issued common share capital in many of the past few years, pursuant to private placement financings and the exercise of warrants and options. Our access to exploration and construction financing is always uncertain, and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant equity or debt funding, including the Closing of the Project Finance Facility.

 

The Company had working capital of approximately $3.3 million as at September 30, 2019, compared with $13.6 million at December 31, 2018.

 

During Q2 and Q3 of 2019, the early warrant exercise program, as well as other warrant and option exercises, provided $4.0 million in cash.

 

On October 21, 2019, we announced the signing of a commitment letter for a US$125 million Project Finance Facility, of which US$25 million is available for drawdown by the Company prior to Closing. Refer to “Project Finance Facility” on page 7 above.

 

As part of the acquisition of the Camino Rojo Project in November 2017, Goldcorp (now Newmont) agreed to provide interest free loans to the Company for all annual land holding costs as they are incurred at Camino Rojo until December 31, 2019, which loans are to be repaid in cash or shares (at Orla’s option subject to certain restrictions) upon reaching commercial production at Camino Rojo. To September 30, 2019, a total of MXN 219 million ($15.1 million) had been advanced pursuant to this agreement (to December 31, 2018 – MXN 121 million, or $8.2 million).

 

Our ability to carry out our long range strategic objectives in future periods depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing activities. We expect to fund the operating costs and the operating and strategic objectives of the Company over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand, and with further equity and/or debt financings.

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Company had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of September 30, 2019 nor as of the date of this MD&A.

 

7. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements requiring disclosure under this section.

 

8. Related Party Transactions

 

This information is provided in note 11 of the accompanying quarterly financial statements.

 

9. Critical accounting estimates

 

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

We review estimates and their underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.

 

Judgements, estimates, and assumptions that we have made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in these consolidated financial statements include:

 

A. Functional currency

 

The functional currency for the parent entity and each of its subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of functional currency involves judgements to identify the primary economic environment. We reconsider the functional currency of each entity if there is a change in the underlying transactions, events and conditions which we used to determine the primary economic environment of that entity.

 

B. Business combinations

 

Determining whether a set of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute the acquisition of a business or the acquisition of an asset requires us to make certain judgements as to whether or not the assets acquired and liabilities assumed include the inputs, processes and outputs necessary to constitute a business as defined in IFRS 3 «Business Combinations». If an acquired set of assets and liabilities includes goodwill, the set is presumed to be a business. Based on an assessment of relevant facts and circumstances, management of the Company concluded that the acquisitions of Cerro Quema in 2016 and of Camino Rojo in 2017 were acquisitions of assets. The values assigned to common shares, stock options and warrants issued and the allocation of the purchase price to the net assets in the acquisition were based on estimates and judgements including discount rates, volatility, expected duration of option and warrant and the relative fair values of the net assets.

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

C. Exploration and evaluation expenditures

 

The application of the Company’s accounting policy for E&E expenditure requires judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely from either future exploitation or sale (prior to which we expense all E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we capitalize the acquisition costs). It also requires us to make judgements on whether activities have reached a stage that permits development of the mineral resource (prior to which they are treated as E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we treat such costs as projects under development and construction).

 

We must also apply a number of estimates and assumptions, such as the determination of the quantities and types of mineral resources, which itself involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on resource classification (measured, indicated or inferred). These estimates directly impact accounting decisions related to our E&E expenditures.

 

We must make certain estimates and assumptions about future events and circumstances, particularly, whether economic mineral exploitation is viable. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, we assess indicators of impairment and may conclude to write off such amounts to the statement of profit or loss.

 

D. Title to mineral properties

 

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. Further, we make judgements for properties where concessions terms have expired, and a renewal application has been made and is awaiting approval. We use judgement as to whether the concession renewal application is probable to be received, but ultimately this is beyond our control. If a renewal application is not approved, we could lose rights to those concession.

 

E. Assessment of impairment indicators

 

We apply judgement in assessing whether indicators of impairment or reverse impairment exist for our E&E assets which could result in a test for impairment. We consider internal and external factors, such as our rights to explore, planned expenditures on E&E activities, the technical results of our E&E activities, and the potential for viable operations, to determine whether there are any indicators of impairment or reversal of a previous impairment.

 

F. Share based payments

 

We issue, grant or award different types of share based payments. These include warrants, options, restricted share units, deferred share units, and bonus shares.

 

We make judgments of expected forfeiture rates, the expected lives of these instrument, expected volatilities, and risk free interest rates. In a unit offering, we prorate the proceeds between common shares and warrants using the relative fair value method, the allocation of which requires significant judgement. In the case of bonus shares we use our judgement to estimate expected vesting periods and vesting probabilities.

 

G. Site closure provisions

 

We make estimates and assumptions in determining the provisions for asset retirement and site closure. The ultimate rehabilitation costs are uncertain, and cost estimates can vary in response to many factors, including judgements of the extent of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, and regulatory changes. We make estimates of rehabilitation costs and of cost increases, inflation rates, and discount rates. These uncertainties will result in actual future expenditures differing from the amounts currently provided. Consequently, there could be significant adjustments to the provisions established, which would affect future financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position.

 

10. Financial Instruments

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is inherently exposed to certain financial risks, including market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk, through the use of financial instruments. The timeframe and the manner in which we manage these risks varies based upon our assessment of these risks and available alternatives for mitigation. We do not acquire or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All transactions undertaken are to support our operations.

 

A discussion of these financial risks and our exposure to them is provided in the notes to the accompanying interim financial statements, and in the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

11. Outstanding Share Data

 

As of the date of this MD&A, the Company had the following equity securities outstanding:

 

· 186,100,177 common shares

 

· 18,203,100 warrants

 

· 10,919,327 stock options

 

· 1,500,000 bonus shares

 

· 1,014,972 restricted share units

 

· 508,780 deferred share units

   

You can find further details about these potentially issuable securities in the notes to the accompanying financial statements, and in the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018.

  

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

12. Risks and Uncertainties

 

As the Company has not commenced principal operations, historical revenue and expenditure trends are not indicative of future activity. The Company has committed to certain work expenditures and may enter into future agreements. The ability of the Company to fund its future operations and commitments is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing. Risks of the Company’s business include the following:

 

Permits and Licenses

 

The exploitation and development of mineral properties may require the Company to obtain regulatory or other permits and licenses from various governmental licensing bodies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain all necessary permits and licenses that may be required to carry out exploration, development and mining operations on its properties.

 

The Company is awaiting mineral concession renewals at its Cerro Quema Project. There is no assurance that we will receive necessary approvals or extensions, or receive them within a reasonable period of time. Failure to receive the permits or extensions would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations. Additional details are provided in the Cerro Quema Project section of this document.

 

The timing of our ability to construct a mine at Camino Rojo is subject to, and may be affected by, timely review and approval by the Mexican environmental and permitting authorities.

 

Foreign Country and Political Risk

 

The Company’s principal mineral properties are located in Mexico and Panama. The Company is subject to certain risks, including currency fluctuations, possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mineral titles or other mineral rights, opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations, and mineral exploration and mining activities may be affected in varying degrees by political stability and government regulations relating to the mining industry. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its business. Exploration and development may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on future exploitation and production, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange controls, income taxes, royalties on production, expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine and/or site safety.

 

Operating in developing economies such as Mexico and Panama has certain risks, including changes to, or invalidation of, government mining regulations; expropriation or revocation of land or property rights; changes in foreign ownership rights; changes in foreign taxation rates; security issues; corruption; uncertain political climate; narco-terrorist actions or activities; and lack of a stable economic climate.

 

We do not carry political risk insurance.

 

Dependence on Exploration-Stage Properties

 

The Company’s current efforts are focused primarily on exploration stage properties. The Camino Rojo and the Cerro Quema Projects may not develop into commercially viable ore bodies, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s potential mineral resource production, profitability, financial performance and results of operations.

 

Estimates of Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves and Production Risks

 

The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates included in this MD&A are estimates based on a number of assumptions, including those stated herein, and any adverse change to those assumptions could require the Company to lower its mineral resource estimate. Until a deposit is actually mined and processed, the quantity and grades of mineral resources must be considered as estimates only. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. In addition, the quantity and/or economic viability of mineral resources may vary depending on, among other things, metal prices, grades, production costs, stripping ratios, recovery rates, permit regulations and other legal requirements, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions. Any material change in the quantity of mineral resources, grade or stripping ratio may affect the economic viability of the Company’s properties. No assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of minerals will in fact be realized or that an identified mineral resource will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) deposit that can be legally and economically exploited. There can also be no assurance that any discoveries of new mineral reserves will be made. Any material reductions in estimates of mineral resources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate assumes that the Company can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Company

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by another mining company (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study dated June 25, 2019, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The Feasibility Study was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the Feasibility Study.

 

Mineral resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions

 

The estimation of mineral resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

In particular, the estimation of mineral resources for the Camino Rojo Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the mineral resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached.

 

Although all mineralization included in the Company’s mineral resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the mineral resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in mineral resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Mining Industry

 

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the current exploration programs planned by the Company will result in a profitable commercial mining operation.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on many factors, some of which are the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as metal prices which are highly cyclical and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

 

Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk. The Company’s operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration and development of ore, including unusual and unexpected geology formations, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. The Company’s mineral exploration activities are directed towards the search, evaluation and development of mineral deposits. There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Company as described herein will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of ore. There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the discovery and acquisition of properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company will compete with other interests, many of which with greater financial resources, for the opportunity to participate in promising projects. Significant capital investment is required to achieve commercial production from successful exploration efforts.

 

Government Regulation

 

The exploration activities of the Company are subject to various federal, provincial and local laws governing prospecting, development, taxes, labour standards, toxic substances and other matters. Exploration activities are also subject to various federal, provincial and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, and land reclamation. These laws also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Although the Company’s exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations governing operations and exploration activities, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations, amendments to current laws and regulations or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Company’s activities.

 

Title Matters

 

Although the Company has diligently investigated title to all mineral concessions (either granted or under re-application) and, to the best of its knowledge (except as otherwise disclosed herein), titles to all its properties are in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to any of the Company’s mineral properties and any of the Company’s properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected encumbrances or defects or governmental actions.

 

Land Title

 

The Company has investigated ownership of all surface rights in which it has an interest, and, to the best of its knowledge, its ownership rights are in good standing. However, all surface rights may be subject to prior claims or agreement transfers, and rights of ownership may be affected by undetected defects. While to the best of the Company's knowledge, titles to all surface rights are in good standing; however, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to the surface rights in which the Company has an interest. The properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and titles may be affected by undetected defects.

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Environmental Risks and Hazards

 

All phases of the Company’s mineral exploration operations are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulations, laws and permits, if any, will not adversely affect the Company’s operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which the Company holds interests which are unknown to the Company at present, which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties. The Company may become liable for such environmental hazards caused by previous owners and operators of the properties even where it has attempted to contractually limit its liability.

 

Government approvals and permits are currently, and may in the future be, required in connection with the Company’s operations. To the extent such approvals are required and not obtained; the Company may be curtailed or prohibited from proceeding with planned exploration or development of mineral properties.

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

 

Commodity Prices

 

The profitability of mining operations is significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold and other minerals. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of these minerals and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in metal prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The price of gold and other minerals has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future serious price declines could cause commercial production to be impracticable.

 

Uninsured Risks

 

The Company carries insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers adequate. Risks not insured against include environmental pollution or other hazards against which such corporations cannot insure or against which they may elect not to insure.

 

Compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws

 

Orla is subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (1999). In general, these laws prohibit a company and its employees and intermediaries from bribing or making other prohibited payments to foreign officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. The Company’s primary operations are located in Panama, a country which is perceived as having fairly high levels of corruption. Orla cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future anti- corruption regulatory requirements to which the Company’s operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

 

Failure to comply with the applicable legislation and other similar foreign laws could expose the Company and/or its senior management to civil and/or criminal penalties, other sanctions and remedial measures, legal expenses and reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the applicable anti-corruption legislation by Canadian or foreign authorities could also have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

As a consequence of these legal and regulatory requirements, the Company has instituted policies with regard to business ethics, which have been designed to ensure that Orla and its employees comply with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that such efforts have been and will be completely effective in ensuring the Company’s compliance, and the compliance of its employees, consultants, contractors and other agents, with all applicable anticorruption laws and regulations.

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

Certain directors of the Company also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in natural resource exploration and development. Consequently, there exists the possibility for such directors to be in a position of conflict. Any decision made by such directors involving the Company will be made in accordance with their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with the Company and such other companies. In addition, such directors will declare, and refrain from voting on, any matter in which such directors may have a conflict of interest.

  

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

13. Forward Looking Statements

 

This MD&A contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding (i) planned exploration and development programs and expenditures; (ii) the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (iii) expectations on the potential extension of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema project; (iv) proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema project and the Camino Rojo project; (v) the potential for the discovery of additional mineral resources; (vi) Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits, required agreements with third parties and regulatory approvals, including but not limited to, the receipt of the Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (“ESIA”) permit related to the Cerro Quema project and other necessary permitting required to implement expected future exploration plans; (vii) community and ejido relations; (viii) requirements for additional land; (ix) availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; (x) results of feasibility studies, including but not limited to mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plans and operations, internal rates of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present values, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; (xi) upside opportunities such as pit wall angles, land agreements, and the development of the sulphide mineral resource, and exploration potential; (xii) the timing and costs for production decisions; (xiii) financing timelines and requirements, including the timing and the amount to be secured relating to the Project Finance Facility; (xiv) the Project Finance Facility, including the proposed terms thereof, the timing for Closing of the Project Finance Facility, the receipt of all required approvals for the Project Finance Facility, commitment and syndication of the balance of the Project Finance Facility, and the expected uses of proceeds of the Project Finance Facility; (xv) timing for start of engineering work, construction, and receipt of permits; (xvi) changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; (xvii) currency and interest rate fluctuations; (xviii) timing for first gold production; and (xix) the Company's objectives and strategies.

 

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, (i) the future price of gold; (ii) anticipated costs and the Company’s ability to fund its programs; (iii) the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities; (iv) the Company’s ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements; (v) the timing and results of drilling programs; (vi) the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Company’s mineral properties; (vii) the obtaining of an agreement with the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein) to develop the entire Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate; (viii) the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects; (ix) the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, (x) assumptions regarding the ability to enter into a definitive agreement regarding the Project Finance Facility; (xi) syndication of the Project Finance Facility; (xii) the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; (xiii) the loan amount to be received upon closing of the Project Finance Facility; (xiv) that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; (xv) that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; (xvi) that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; (xvii) that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties; (xviii) the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner; and (xix) the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Page 24

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements include, among others: (i) failing to enter into a definitive agreement with Trinity Capital or failing to receive commitments or syndicate the balance of the Project Finance Facility; (ii) risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, including changes in economic parameters; (iii) risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; (iv) failure to obtain required regulatory and stock exchange approvals with respect to any Offering; (v) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (vi) delays in or failure to obtain an agreement with the Adjacent Owner with respect to the Camino Rojo Project; (vii) health, safety and environmental risks; (viii) success of exploration, development and operations activities; (ix) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (x) delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (xi) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (xii) uncertainty in estimates of production, capital and operation costs and potential for production and cost overruns; (xiii) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (xiv) the fluctuating price of gold; (xv) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xvi) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; (xvii) competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of mineral reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; and (xviii) the Company’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions.

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risks and Uncertainties” in this MD&A for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this MD&A and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. You are urged to read the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which you can view online under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com

 

Page 25

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

14. Abbreviations Used

 

$ Canadian dollars
   
AIF Annual Information Form
   
AISC All in Sustaining Cost
   
Ag Silver
   
Au Gold
   
Camino Rojo PEA Report An independent technical report for the Camino Rojo Project entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 (the “Camino Rojo PEA Report”) prepared by Carl E. Defilippi, RM, SME of Kappes Cassiday & Associates (“KCA”), Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. of Resource Geosciences Incorporated (“RGI”), and Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM of Independent Mining Consultants Inc. (“IMC”).  
   
Canplats Canplats Resources Corporation
   
Cerro Quema Report
or
2014 PFS
An independent technical report for the Cerro Quema Project entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”) prepared by Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA.  
   
CFE Comisión Federal de Electricidad, the state-owned electric utility of Mexico
   
CIM Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
   
Company Orla Mining Ltd.
   
CSR Community and Social Responsibility
   
EPCM Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management
   
ESIA Estudio de Impacto Ambiental, a Panamanian environmental impact study
   
g/t Grams per metric tonne
   
G&A General and administrative costs
   
GAAP Generally accepted accounting principles, which for the Company are IFRS
   
Goldcorp Goldcorp Inc., a predecessor company to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, prior to April 18, 2019.
   
MXN Mexican pesos
   
Newmont Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, a publicly traded company resulting from the combination of Newmont Mining Corporation and Goldcorp Inc., effective April 18, 2019.
   
ha Hectares
   
HGL HydroGeoLogica Inc.
   
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
   
IMC Independent Mining Consultants Inc.
   
IP Induced polarization
   
IRR Internal rate of return
   
K tonnes Thousands of metric tonnes
   
Koz Thousands of troy ounces

 

Page 26

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

KCA Kappes Cassiday and Associates
   
LOM Life of mine
   
M&I Measured and indicated
   
MD&A Management's Discussion and Analysis
   
MIA Manifiesto de Impacto Ambiental.  In English, an Environmental Impact Statement
   
NI 43-101 Canadian National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects”
   
NPV Net present value
   
PEA Preliminary Economic Assessment
   
Pb Lead
   
PFS Pre-Feasibility Study
   
RC Reverse circulation
   
RGI Resource Geosciences Incorporated
   
SEDAR The System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval, a filing system operated by the Canadian Securities Administrators, accessible at: www.sedar.com
   
SEMARNAT Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.  In English, the Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (Mexico)
   
t Metric tonne, equal to 1,000 kilograms (approximately 2,205 pounds)
   
TSX Toronto Stock Exchange
   
US$ United States dollars
   
Zn Zinc

  

Page 27

 

Exhibit 99.49

 

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Jason Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended September 30, 2019.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on July 1, 2019 and ended on September 30, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date: November 12, 2019

 

/s/ Jason Simpson  
Jason Simpson  
Chief Executive Officer  

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.50

 

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended September 30, 2019.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on July 1, 2019 and ended on September 30, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date: November 12, 2019

 

/s/ Etienne Morin  
Etienne Morin  
Chief Financial Officer  

 

 

Exhibit 99.51 

 

MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT
UNDER NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 51-102

 

Item 1 Name and Address of Company

 

Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Company”)

Suite 202 - 595 Howe Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6C 2T5

 

Item 2 Date of Material Change

 

October 20, 2019

 

Item 3 News Release

 

A news release with respect to the material change referred to in this report was disseminated by the Company on October 21, 2019 through Newswire and was subsequently filed on SEDAR.

 

Item 4 Summary of Material Change

 

On October 20, 2019, the Company entered into a commitment letter (the “Commitment Letter”) with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) with respect to a secured project finance facility of up to US$125 million (“Facility”) for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project located in Zacatecas, Mexico (the “Camino Rojo Project”). The Facility is being arranged by Trinity Capital and will include a syndicate of lenders led by Pierre Lassonde, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”) and Trinity Capital.

 

Item 5 Full Description of Material Change

 

On October 20, 2019, the Company entered into the Commitment Letter with Trinity Capital with respect to the Facility for the development of the Camino Rojo Project. The Facility is being arranged by Trinity Capital and will include a syndicate of lenders led by Pierre Lassonde, Agnico Eagle and Trinity Capital.

 

In connection with the Commitment Letter, Mr. Lassonde, Agnico Eagle and Trinity Capital have collectively committed to provide an initial tranche of an aggregate of US$25 million, which the Company may draw, at its option, prior to final syndication and completion of definitive documentation relating to the Facility and prior to final receipt of required mine permits. This initial advance will provide the Company with the flexibility to order long lead items and maintain an efficient construction schedule. The balance of the Facility will be available subject to the completion of definitive documentation, the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent and syndication (“Closing”), which is being arranged by Trinity Capital.

 

Key terms of the Facility will include:

 

· Term of 5.0 years.

 

· Up to US$125 million, with an early drawdown option:

 

o US$25 million is committed and, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, will be available for drawdown prior to Closing at the Company’s option (the “Initial Tranche”).

 

o Two subsequent tranches of US$50 million each, available for drawdown upon Closing and after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of key permits required for the development of Camino Rojo.

 

· Interest rate of 8.8% per annum.

 

 

- 2 -

 

· 32.5 million common share purchase warrants to be issued to the lenders on Closing, with an exercise price of C$3.00 per warrant, representing a 97% premium to the closing price of the Company on October 18, 2019, and a 7-year term.

 

· Principal repayment at maturity with no scheduled amortization: the Company can prepay the loan, in full or in part, at any time during the term, without penalty, with cash flow from operations.

 

· No mandatory hedging, production payments, offtake, streams or royalties are required.

 

The Facility will include standard and customary project finance terms and conditions with respect to fees and conditions precedent to Closing (including satisfaction of remaining customary due diligence and other approvals) and remains subject to the completion and execution of definitive loan documentation. The issuance of securities under the terms of the Facility is subject to regulatory approvals. Closing of the transaction is expected during the fourth quarter of 2019.

 

Multilateral Instrument 61-101

 

Mr. Lassonde has beneficial ownership of, control or direction over, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company and accordingly, the Facility and the issuance of the warrants insofar as they involve Mr. Lassonde would constitute a related party transaction for the purposes of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (“MI 61-101”). The warrants to be issued to Mr. Lassonde in connection with the Initial Tranche of the Facility represent approximately 1.4% of the 186,081,200 common shares issued and outstanding as at the date hereof and are not expected to result in a material change to Mr. Lassonde’s shareholdings. The Facility, including the participation of Mr. Lassonde and issuance of warrants in connection therewith, was considered, and ultimately approved by the board of directors of the Company on October 15, 2019. The Company is not required to obtain a formal valuation for the Facility by virtue of section 5.4 of MI 61-101. In addition, the Company is relying on the exemption from the formal valuation and minority approval requirements of MI 61-101 set out in section 5.5(a) and section 5.7(a) of MI 61-101 as the fair market value of the Facility and the warrants insofar as it relates to interested parties is not more than 25% of market capitalization.

 

Item 6 Reliance on subsection 7.1(2) of National Instrument 51-102

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 7 Omitted Information

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 8 Executive Officer

 

For further information contact Etienne Morin at (604) 564-1852.

 

Item 9 Date of Report

 

DATED as of this 29th day of October, 2019.

 

 

- 3 -

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This material change report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the Facility, including the proposed terms thereof, the timing for Closing of the Facility, the receipt of all required approvals for the Facility, commitment and syndication of the balance of the Facility, expected use of proceeds of the Facility, results of the feasibility study, including but not limited to the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plan and operations, internal rate of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present value, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; the timing and costs for production decisions; financing timelines and requirements, including the timing and the amount to be secured relating to the Facility; permitting timelines and requirements; requirements for additional land; exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources; upside opportunities including pit wall angles, land agreements, the development of the sulphide mineral resource and exploration potential; timing for start of engineering work, construction, and receipt of permits; timing for first gold production; and the Company's objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this material change report, including without limitation, assumptions regarding the ability to enter into a definitive agreement regarding the Facility; syndication of the Facility; price of gold and silver; the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; the loan amount to be received upon closing of the Facility; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: failing to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management; failing to enter into a definitive agreement with Trinity Capital or failing to receive commitments or syndicate the balance of the Facility; risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, including changes in the economic parameters; risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses, as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company’s most recently filed management’s discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 28, 2019, available on www.sedar.com. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.52

 

INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT

 

 

AGNICO EAGLE MINES LIMITED

 

- and -

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

 

 

 

 

October 18, 2019

 

 

  

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ARTICLE 1
INTERPRETATION
 
1.1 Defined Terms 1
1.2 Rules of Construction 5
1.3 Entire Agreement 6
1.4 Time of Essence 6
1.5 Governing Law and Submission to Jurisdiction 6
1.6 Severability 7
 
ARTICLE 2
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
2.1 Nomination Right 7
2.2 Management to Endorse and Vote 7
2.3 Directors’ Liability Insurance 8
2.4 Director Compensation 8
 
ARTICLE 3
PARTICIPATION RIGHT
 
3.1 Notice of Issuances 8
3.2 Grant of Participation Right 9
3.3 Top-up Offering 9
3.4 Exercise Notice 10
3.5 Issuance of Offered Securities and Top-up Shares 11
3.6 Reduction of Participating Percentage 12
3.7 Non-Cash Consideration 12
3.8 Issuances Not Subject to Participation Right or Top-up Right 12
 
ARTICLE 4
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
 
4.1 Representations and Warranties of the Company 13
4.2 Representations and Warranties of the Investor 14
 
ARTICLE 5
COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY
 
5.1 Reporting Issuer Status and Listing of Common Shares 14
5.2 No Conflict With Shareholders’ Rights Plan 15
5.3 Subsidiary Security Issuances 15
5.4 Grant of Additional Third Party Participation Rights 15
 
ARTICLE 6
COVENANTS OF THE INVESTOR
 
6.1 Investor Voting 15
6.2 Share Dispositions 16
 

 

 

- 2 -

 

ARTICLE 7
MISCELLANEOUS
 
7.1 Termination of Existing Agreements 18
7.2 Termination 18
7.3 Right to Information 18
7.4 Technical Assistance 18
7.5 Notices 19
7.6 Amendments and Waivers 21
7.7 Assignment 21
7.8 Successors and Assigns 21
7.9 Expenses 21
7.10 Public Disclosure 21
7.11 Further Assurances 21
7.12 Right to Injunctive Relief 22
7.13 Counterparts 22

 

 

 

INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT

 

THIS AGREEMENT made the 18th day of October, 2019,

 

B E T W E E N:

 

AGNICO EAGLE MINES LIMITED,
a corporation existing under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario),

 

(hereinafter referred to as the “Investor”),

 

- and -                                                                                          

 

ORLA MINING LTD.,
a corporation existing under the Canada Business Corporations Act,

 

(hereinafter referred to as the “Company”).

 

WHEREAS the Investor owns 17,613,835 Common Shares (as defined below) and 870,250 Warrants (as defined below) which represent approximately 9.47% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares on a non-diluted basis and 9.89% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares on a partially-diluted basis;

 

AND WHEREAS the Company and the Investor are currently party to a Participation Right Agreement and a Technical Services Agreement (as such terms are defined below), and the Investor and the Company wish to enter into this Agreement in order to, among other things, terminate and replace the Participation Right Agreement and Technical Services Agreement and establish certain additional rights and obligations between the parties;

 

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in consideration of the respective covenants and agreements of the parties herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged by each party), the parties agree as follows:

 

Article 1
INTERPRETATION

 

1.1 Defined Terms

 

For the purposes of this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set out below and grammatical variations of such terms shall have corresponding meanings:

 

Act” means the Canada Business Corporations Act;

 

Additional Property Rights” means all rights, other than mining concessions, in respect of a mining project, including exploration permits, exploration rights, surface rights, water rights and other rights relating to minerals or to access minerals, and other forms of mineral title, under Applicable Laws, whether contractual, statutory or otherwise;

 

 

- 2 -

 

Affiliate” has the meaning ascribed to such term in the Act, as in effect on the date of this Agreement;

 

Applicable Laws” means with respect to any person, any domestic, foreign, federal, provincial, state, county or municipal or local law, rule or regulation, including any statute, regulation, rule or subordinate legislation or treaty or common law and any rule, decree, policy or enactment of any Governmental Authority that is binding or applicable to such Person;

 

Board” means the board of directors of the Company;

 

Bought Deal” means a fully underwritten offering on a bought deal basis pursuant to which an underwriter has committed to purchase securities of the Company pursuant to a “bought deal” letter prior to the filing of a preliminary prospectus or prospectus supplement or a distribution pursuant to an overnight marketed offering;

 

Business Day” means any day, other than: (a) a Saturday, Sunday or statutory holiday in the Province of Ontario or the Province of British Columbia; or (b) a day on which banks are generally closed in the Province of Ontario or the Province of British Columbia;

 

Camino Rojo Option Agreement” means the option agreement dated November 7, 2017 between the Company and Goldcorp Inc. (now Newmont Goldcorp Corporation);

 

Camino Rojo Project” means the Company’s mineral project located in Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico, including all mining concessions, Additional Property Rights and other rights to develop a mining project relating thereto;

 

Canadian Securities Laws” means the applicable securities legislation of each of the provinces and territories of Canada and all published regulations, policy statements, orders, rules, instruments, rulings and interpretation notes issued thereunder or in relation thereto, as the same may hereafter be amended from time to time or replaced;

 

Cerro Quema Project” means all mineral rights, mining concessions (including, for greater certainty the mineral concessions contracts between the Company or its subsidiaries and the Republic of Panama) and Additional Property Rights, or any rights to acquire any of the foregoing, and any amendments, additions or extensions thereto, relating to the Company’s mineral project on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province of southwestern Panama;

 

Common Shares” means the common shares in the capital of the Company issued and outstanding from time to time and includes any common shares that may be issued hereafter;

 

Company” shall have the meaning set out in the preamble hereto;

 

Confidentiality Agreement” means the confidentiality agreement dated as of October 18th, 2019 between the Company and the Investor, as amended varied or supplemented from time to time;

 

Consents” means all consents, approvals, permits, licences, waivers of rights of first refusal or waivers of due on sale clauses or other waivers, as applicable, from: (a) any party to any contract; and (b) any Governmental Authority necessary in connection with the execution of this Agreement or the performance of any terms thereof or any document delivered pursuant thereto or the completion of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;

 

 

- 3 -

 

Constating Documents” means, with respect to any Person, its articles or certificate of incorporation, amendment, amalgamation or continuance, memorandum and articles of association, letters patent, supplementary letters patent, by-laws, partnership agreement, limited liability Corporation or social agreement or other similar document, and all unanimous shareholder agreements, other shareholder agreements, voting trusts, pooling and/or syndicated agreements and similar contracts, arrangements and understandings applicable to the Person’s securities, all as amended, supplemented, restated and replaced from time to time;

 

Convertible Securities” means any security convertible, exchangeable or exercisable for or into, with or without consideration, Common Shares or other equity or voting securities of the Company, including any warrants, options or other rights issued by the Company and, for greater certainty, including any securities issued under any equity incentive compensation arrangements;

 

Dilutive Issuance” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(a)(i);

 

Exchange” means the TSX or such other stock exchange where the Common Shares are listed from time to time;

 

Excluded Event” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.8;

 

Exercise Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.4;

 

Existing Convertible Securities” means Convertible Securities issued prior to, and outstanding, as of the date hereof;

 

Governmental Authority” means any: (a) multinational, federal, provincial, state, regional, municipal, local or other government, governmental or public department, ministry, central bank, court, tribunal, arbitral body, bureau or agency, domestic or foreign; (b) subdivision, agent, commission, board, or authority of any of the foregoing; or (c) quasi-governmental or private body exercising any regulatory, expropriation or taxing authority under or for the account of any of the foregoing, including any stock exchange or self-regulatory authority and, for greater certainty, the Securities Regulatory Authorities and the TSX or any other Exchange as applicable;

 

Indemnified Party” shall have the meaning set out in Section 7.4(f);

 

““Investor” shall have the meaning set out in the preamble hereto;

 

Investor Nominee” shall have the meaning set out in Section 2.1(a);

 

Issuance” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.1;

 

Losses” shall have the meaning set out in Section 7.4(f);

 

 

- 4 -

 

Market Price” means the “market price” of the Common Shares as such term is defined in the TSX Company Manual, or if the Common Shares are not traded on the TSX at the relevant time, the closing price of the Common Shares on the trading day immediately prior to the date of public announcement of the offering on such other exchange or marketplace as such shares are then traded (or at the “market price” otherwise determined pursuant to the rules of such other exchange or marketplace, if different);

 

Monitor Gold Option Agreements” means the option agreement dated January 24, 2018 between the Company and Mountain Gold Claims LLC, the option agreement dated March 21, 2018 between the Company and King Solomon Gold LLC and the option agreement dated March 22, 2018 between the Company and Ely Gold Royalties Inc.;

 

Notice Period” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.4;

 

Offered Securities” means any equity or voting securities, or securities convertible into, exercisable or exchangeable for equity or voting securities, of the Company;

 

Offering” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.1;

 

Offering Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.1;

 

Participating Percentage” means, initially, 15%, subject to adjustment only pursuant to Section 3.6;

 

Participation Right” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.2;

 

Participation Right Agreement” means the participation right agreement dated January 26, 2018 between the Company and the Investor;

 

Person” means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, unincorporated association, unincorporated syndicate, unincorporated organization, trust, company, corporation or other body corporate, union, Governmental Authority and a natural person in his capacity as trustee, executor, administrator, or other legal representative;

 

Private Sale Purchaser” shall have the meaning set out in Section 6.2(a)(ii);

 

Projects” means the Cerro Quema Project and the Camino Rojo Project;

 

Proposed Private Sale” shall have the meaning set out in Section 6.2(a);

 

Purchaser Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 6.2(a)(ii);

 

Reporting Jurisdictions” means each of the provinces and territories of Canada;

 

Sale Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 6.2(a)(i);

 

Sale Period” shall have the meaning set out in Section 6.2(a)(ii);

 

Securities Regulatory Authorities” means the securities regulatory authority of each of the Reporting Jurisdictions, and any Exchange;

 

Technical Assistance” shall have the meaning set out in Section 7.3;

 

 

- 5 -

 

Technical Services Agreement” means the technical services agreement dated January 26, 2018 between the Company and the Investor;

 

Third Party” means, in relation to any party, a person with whom such party deals at “arm’s length”, as such term is understood for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada);

 

Top-up Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(b);

 

Top-up Offering” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(c);

 

Top-up Right” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(a)(i);

 

Top-up Shares” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(a)(i);

 

Top-up Threshold” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.3(a)(ii);

 

Transfer” includes any direct or indirect transfer, sale, exchange, assignment, endorsement, gift, bequest, disposition, mortgage, charge, pledge, encumbrance, grant of security interest or any arrangement by which possession, legal title or beneficial ownership passes from one Person to another, or to the same Person in a different capacity, in each case, whether or not voluntary and whether or not for value, and any agreement to effect any of the foregoing; and the words “Transferred” and “Transferring” and similar words have corresponding meanings;

 

TSX” means the Toronto Stock Exchange;

 

Warrants” means common share purchase warrants of the Company entitling the holder thereof to purchase one Common Share at a price of C$2.35 at any time prior to February 15, 2021;

 

Upsize Notice” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.4(b); and

 

Upsize Option” shall have the meaning set out in Section 3.4(b).

 

1.2 Rules of Construction

 

Except as may be otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement and unless the context otherwise requires, in this Agreement:

 

(a) the terms “Agreement”, “this Agreement”, “hereto”, “hereof”, “herein”, “hereby”, “hereunder” and similar expressions refer to this Agreement in its entirety and not to any particular provision hereof;

 

(b) references to an “Article” or “Section” followed by a number or letter refer to the specified Article or Section to this Agreement;

 

(c) the division of this Agreement into articles and sections and the insertion of headings are for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of this Agreement;

 

(d) words importing the singular number only shall include the plural and vice versa and words importing the use of any gender shall include all genders;

 

 

- 6 -

 

(e) the word “including” is deemed to mean “including without limitation”;

 

(f) the terms “party” and “the parties” refer to a party or the parties to this Agreement;

 

(g) any reference to this Agreement means this Agreement as amended, modified, replaced or supplemented from time to time;

 

(h) any reference to a statute, regulation or rule shall be construed to be a reference thereto as the same may from time to time be amended, re-enacted or replaced, and any reference to a statute shall include any regulations or rules made thereunder;

 

(i) all references to a percentage ownership of Common Shares shall be calculated on a non-diluted basis;

 

(j) any time period within which a payment is to be made or any other action is to be taken hereunder shall be calculated excluding the day on which the period commences and including the day on which the period ends; and

 

(k) whenever any action is required to be taken or period of time is to expire on a day other than a Business Day, such action shall be taken or period shall expire on the next following Business Day.

 

1.3 Entire Agreement

 

This Agreement and the Confidentiality Agreement constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersede all prior agreements, understandings, negotiations and discussions, whether written or oral, between the parties. There are no conditions, covenants, agreements, representations, warranties or other provisions, express or implied, collateral, statutory or otherwise, relating to the subject matter hereof except as provided in the aforesaid agreements.

 

1.4 Time of Essence

 

Time shall be of the essence of this Agreement.

 

1.5 Governing Law and Submission to Jurisdiction

 

(a)            This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with, and the respective rights and obligations of the parties shall be governed by, the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable in that province.

 

(b)            Each of the parties irrevocably and unconditionally: (i) submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario over any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement; (ii) waives any objection that it might otherwise be entitled to assert to the jurisdiction of such courts; and (iii) agrees not to assert that such courts are not a convenient forum for the determination of any such action or proceeding.

 

 

- 7 -

 

1.6 Severability

 

If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, all other provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to either party. Upon such determination that any term or other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent of the parties as closely as possible in an acceptable manner to the end that transactions contemplated hereby are fulfilled to the extent possible.

 

Article 2
BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

2.1 Nomination Right

 

(a)            For so long as the Participating Percentage is at least 5%, the Investor shall be entitled to designate one nominee who shall be a Person eligible to serve as a director pursuant to the Act (an “Investor Nominee”) for election or appointment to the Board.

 

(b)            The Company covenants and agrees, within 10 Business Days’ of receiving a written notice from the Investor to the Company, to forthwith take all necessary steps, including increasing the size of the Board or causing the resignation of a director, to cause the appointment of an individual selected by the Investor to serve on the Board as the initial Investor Nominee until the next annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders, and in the event that it is necessary to seek shareholder approval for the election of the initial Investor Nominee, the Company shall call and hold a meeting of its shareholders to consider the election of the Investor Nominee as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event such meeting shall be held within 75 days of the Company receiving such written notice from the Investor.

 

(c)            The Company shall provide the Investor with notice in writing promptly upon determining the date of any meeting of shareholders at which directors of the Company are to be elected and the Investor shall advise the Company of its Investor Nominee promptly and in any event within 15 Business Days of receipt of such notice. If the Investor does not advise the Company of the identity of any Investor Nominee prior to any such deadline, then the Investor will be deemed to have nominated its incumbent nominee.

 

(d)            The Investor Nominee must consent in writing to serve as a director of the Company and meet all statutory and stock exchange requirements for membership on the Board.

 

(e)            In the event that any Investor Nominee shall cease to serve as a director of the Company, whether due to such Investor Nominee’s death, disability, resignation or removal, the Company shall cause the Board to promptly appoint a replacement Investor Nominee designated by the Investor to fill the vacancy created by such death, disability, resignation or removal, provided that the Investor remains eligible to designate an Investor Nominee.

 

2.2 Management to Endorse and Vote

 

(a)            The Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that the Investor Nominee is elected to the Board, including soliciting proxies in support of their election and taking the same actions taken by the Company to ensure the election of the other nominees selected by the Board for election to the Board.

 

 

- 8 -

 

(b)            The Company agrees that management of the Company shall, in respect of every meeting of the shareholders at which directors of the Company are to be elected, and at every reconvened meeting following an adjournment thereof or postponement thereof, endorse and recommend the Investor Nominee identified in the proxy materials for election to the Board, and shall vote the Common Shares and any other shares of the Company entitled to vote in the election of directors in respect of which management is granted a discretionary proxy in favour of the election of such Investor Nominee to the Board at every such meeting, and the Company shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause management to vote their Common Shares and any other shares of the Company entitled to vote in the election of directors in favour of the election of such Investor Nominee to the Board at every such meeting.

 

(c)            Forthwith following any meeting of shareholders at which an Investor Nominee was nominated to serve as a director but was not validly elected by the shareholders in accordance with the Act, the Company shall take all steps necessary to appoint an Investor Nominee to the Board who is not the same individual who was not elected at the meeting of shareholders, including pursuant to the power of the Board to appoint additional directors between shareholders’ meetings or to fill a vacancy on the Board.

 

2.3 Directors’ Liability Insurance

 

An Investor Nominee shall be entitled to the benefit of any directors’ liability insurance and indemnity to which other directors of the Company are entitled.

 

2.4 Director Compensation

 

If the Investor Nominee is an “independent director” pursuant to applicable securities laws and is not employed by or compensated by the Investor in any manner, the Investor Nominee shall be entitled to receive the same compensation, options, or other equity awards, as such awards may be granted to any other director from time-to-time by the Company on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, pursuant to the Company’s equity compensation plans as compensation for services rendered as a member of the Board. In addition, for the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Section 2.4 or any other provision of this Agreement shall prohibit, constrain or otherwise restrict the Investor Nominee from carrying out its duties as a director of the Company, including voicing the Investor Nominee’s opinion and voting on Board matters as they deem fit in the circumstances. It is further acknowledged and agreed that the Investor Nominee will be required to declare any conflicts of interest and abstain from voting on Board matters where any such conflict arises.

 

Article 3
PARTICIPATION RIGHT

 

3.1 Notice of Issuances

 

Subject to Section 3.6, and provided that the Participating Percentage is at least 5%, if the Company proposes to issue (the “Issuance”) any Offered Securities pursuant to a public offering, a private placement or otherwise (but excluding any issuances of Common Shares in respect of which the Top-up Right would be applicable) (each, an “Offering”) at any time after the date hereof, the Company will, as soon as possible after the public announcement of the Offering, but in any event not later than seven Business Days prior to the expected completion date of the Issuance, give written notice of the Issuance (the “Offering Notice”) to the Investor including, to the extent known by the Company, full particulars of the Offering, including the number of Offered Securities, the rights, privileges, restrictions, terms and conditions of the Offered Securities, the price per Offered Security to be issued under the Offering, the expected use of proceeds of the Offering and the expected closing date of the Offering. The Offering Notice shall also include copies of any investor presentation, prospectus or offering memorandum or similar disclosure document, subscription agreement and other materials delivered by or proposed to be delivered by the Company (or by any agent or investment dealer acting on behalf of the Company) to potential subscribers under the Offering.

 

 

- 9 -

 

3.2 Grant of Participation Right

 

(a)            The Company agrees that, subject to Section 3.6 and provided that the Participating Percentage is at least 5%, the Investor (directly or through an Affiliate) has the right (the “Participation Right”) to subscribe for and to be issued as part of an Offering at the subscription price per Offered Security pursuant to the Offering and otherwise on substantially the terms and conditions of the Offering (provided that, if the Investor is prohibited by Canadian Securities Laws or other Applicable Laws or the rules of any stock exchange from participating on substantially the terms and conditions of the Offering, the Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to enable the Investor to participate on terms and conditions that are as substantially similar as circumstances permit):

 

(i) in the case of an Offering of Common Shares, up to such number of Common Shares that will allow the Investor (at its election and in its sole discretion) to maintain or acquire up to, as applicable, a percentage ownership interest in the Common Shares equal to the Participating Percentage; and

 

(ii) in the case of an Offering of Offered Securities (other than Common Shares), up to such number of Offered Securities that will (after giving effect to the Offering and assuming, for all purposes of this Section 3.2(a)(ii), the conversion, exercise or exchange of all of the convertible, exercisable or exchangeable Offered Securities issued in connection with the Offering and issuable pursuant to this Section 3.2) allow the Investor (at its election and in its sole discretion) to maintain or acquire up to, as applicable, a percentage ownership interest in the Common Shares equal to the Participating Percentage.

 

(b)            If, upon the exercise by the Investor of its Participation Right, the Investor becomes entitled to a fractional interest in an Offered Security, any such fractional Offered Security that is: (i) less than 0.5 of an Offered Security will be rounded down to the nearest whole Offered Security, and (ii) 0.5, or greater, of an Offered Security will be rounded up to the nearest whole Offered Security unless the Investor holds less than 10% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares and such rounding would result, in and of itself, in the Investor holding 10% or more of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.

 

3.3 Top-up Offering

 

(a)            Without limiting Section 3.2, the Company agrees that, subject to the terms of this Section 3.3:

 

 

- 10 -

 

(i) the Investor (directly or through an Affiliate) has the right (the “Top-up Right”) to subscribe for and to be issued in connection with the issuance of Common Shares pursuant to the Monitor Gold Option Agreements and on the conversion, exercise or exchange of Convertible Securities (a “Dilutive Issuance”) up to such number of Common Shares that will allow the Investor (at its election and in its sole discretion) to maintain or acquire up to, as applicable, a percentage ownership interest in the Common Shares equal to the Participating Percentage, in each case after giving effect to such Dilutive Issuance (the “Top-up Shares”); and

 

(ii) the Top-up Right shall be exercisable from time to time following Dilutive Issuances that result in the reduction of the Investor’s percentage ownership interest by 1.0%, in the aggregate (the “Top-up Threshold”). The Top-up Threshold shall be calculated by aggregating all Dilutive Issuances that occurred in each case from the later of (A) the date of this Agreement, (B) the date of the last Top-up Notice or (C) the date of completion of the last Top-up Offering.

 

(b)            Subject to Section 3.3(d), within 10 Business Days of the end of each of the first and third fiscal quarters, provided that during such fiscal quarter or during the previous fiscal quarter one or more Dilutive Issuances occured resulting in the Top-up Threshold being achieved, the Company shall deliver a written notice (a “Top-up Notice”) to the Investor containing the number of Existing Convertible Securities converted, exercised or exchanged into Common Shares, and the total number of issued and outstanding Common Shares following such Dilutive Issuances and any other conversions, exercises and exchanges of Convertible Securities, in each case from the later of (A) the date of this Agreement, (B) the date of the last Top-up Notice or (C) the date of completion of the last Top-up Offering.

 

(c)            If the Investor delivers an Exercise Notice in accordance with Section 3.4, the Company shall in accordance with the provisions of this Article 3, promptly, and in any event within 30 days of the date on which the relevant Top-up Notice was delivered, complete an offering to the Investor of the number of Top-up Shares the Investor wishes to subscribe for pursuant to the Top-up Right, as specified in the Exercise Notice, at an offering price per Top-up Share equal to the Market Price of the Common Shares on or after the date the Top-up Notice was delivered to the Investor (each, a “Top-up Offering”). For greater certainty, each Top-up Offering will be an offering of Common Shares.

 

(d)            Notwithstanding Section 3.3(a), 3.3(b) or 3.3(c), if a Top-up Threshold is achieved in, or is determined by the Company, acting reasonably, to be likely to occur prior to the end of, a fiscal quarter prior to setting the record date for any meeting of shareholders, the Company shall deliver a Top-up Notice to the Investor and, if the Investor delivers an Exercise Notice in accordance with Section 3.4 in response to a Top-up Notice delivered pursuant to this Section 3.3(d), the Company shall in accordance with the provisions of this Article 3, promptly, and in any event prior to declaring the record date for such shareholder meeting, complete a Top-up Offering to the Investor.

 

3.4 Exercise Notice

 

(a)            If the Investor wishes to exercise the Participation Right or the Top-up Right, the Investor shall give written notice to the Company (the “Exercise Notice”) of its intention to exercise such right and of the number of Offered Securities or Top-up Shares the Investor wishes to subscribe for and purchase pursuant to the Participation Right or the Top-up Right, as applicable. The Investor shall deliver an Exercise Notice to subscribe to the Offering, Issuance or issuance of Top-up Shares, within five Business Days after the date of receipt of an Offering Notice, Top-up Notice or Upsize Notice, as applicable, or in the case of a public offering that is a Bought Deal, within two Business Days of receipt of an Offering Notice or Upsize Notice (the “Notice Period”), failing which the Investor will not be entitled to exercise the Participation Right or the Top-up Right in respect of such Offering, Issuance or issuance of Top-up Shares.

 

 

- 11 -

 

(b)            If the Company at any time proposes to increase the number of any Offered Securities to be issued in the Offering it shall, by notice in writing delivered to the Investor (the “Upsize Notice”), give the Investor the option to subscribe for its pro rata share of the additional Offered Securities (the “Upsize Option”). The Investor shall be entitled to exercise the Upsize Option by delivering a new Exercise Notice to the Company. If no new Exercise Notice is delivered by the Investor to the Company within one Business Day of receipt by the Investor of the Upsize Notice, the Exercise Notice of the Investor delivered in respect of the original Offering Notice shall continue in full force and effect.

 

3.5 Issuance of Offered Securities and Top-up Shares

 

(a)            If the Company receives an Exercise Notice from the Investor within the Notice Period, then the Company shall, subject to:

 

(i) the receipt and continued effectiveness of all required approvals (including the approval(s) of the TSX and any other stock exchange on which the Common Shares are then listed and/or traded and any required approvals under Canadian Securities Laws and any shareholder approval required under Applicable Laws), which approvals the Company shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to promptly obtain (including by applying for any necessary price protection confirmations, seeking shareholder approval (if required) in the manner described below, and using its commercially reasonable efforts to cause management and each member of the Board to vote their Common Shares and any shares of the Company entitled to vote in the matter and all votes received by proxy in favour of the issuance of the Offered Securities or the Top-up Shares, as applicable, to the Investor); and

 

(ii) the completion of the relevant Offering, if applicable,

 

issue to the Investor or its nominee, against payment of the subscription price payable in respect thereof, that number of Offered Securities or Top-Up Shares, as applicable, set out in the Exercise Notice.

 

(b)            The parties agree that the issuance of any Offered Securities to the Investor pursuant to this Section 3.5 shall occur concurrently with the completion of the associated Offering, provided that if shareholder approval is sought pursuant to Section 3.5(c), the issuance of any Offered Securities to the Investor requiring such approval shall occur as soon as reasonably practicable following the meeting of shareholders.

 

(c)            If the Company is required by the Exchange or otherwise under Applicable Laws to seek shareholder approval for the issuance of the Offered Securities or the Top-up Shares, as applicable, to the Investor or its nominee, then the Company shall, in its sole discretion, either: (i) terminate the Offering, or (ii) call and hold a meeting of its shareholders to consider the issuance of the Offered Securities or the Top-up Shares, as applicable, to the Investor as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event such meeting shall be held within 75 days after the date that the Company is first advised by the TSX or other applicable Governmental Authority that it will require shareholder approval, in which case the Company shall recommend approval of the issuance of the Offered Securities or the Top-up Shares, as applicable, to the Investor and solicit proxies in support thereof.

 

 

- 12 -

 

3.6 Reduction of Participating Percentage

 

If the Investor elects not to exercise the Participation Right in respect of an Offering of Common Shares (other than an Excluded Event) for which the Company has delivered to the Investor an Offering Notice in accordance with Section 3.2, the Participating Percentage shall be reduced to be the amount equal to the percentage determined by dividing (a) the number of Common Shares then held by the Investor and its Affiliates plus the number of Common Shares issuable upon exercise of securities convertible into or otherwise exchangeable for equity or voting securities of the Company then held by the Investor by (b) the total number of issued and outstanding Common Shares plus the number of Common Shares issuable upon exercise of the securities issued in connection with the Offering that are convertible into or otherwise exchangeable for equity or voting securities of the Company, in each case following completion of such Offering.

 

3.7 Non-Cash Consideration

 

If the Offered Securities being issued under an Offering are to be issued for consideration other than cash consideration, the consideration per Offered Security payable by the Investor upon exercise of its Participation Right shall be the cash equivalent of the fair market value of the non-cash consideration per Offered Security to be paid by the other acquirors under the Offering, as determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, acting reasonably and with the advice of its financial advisors.

 

3.8 Issuances Not Subject to Participation Right or Top-up Right

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Participation Right shall only apply to an Offering for which the Company anticipates that the majority of the cash or non-cash consideration of the Offering is to be applied or is intended for the purposes of the advancement of one or both of the Projects (any other Offering being, an “Excluded Event”), provided however that should the Company in fact apply a majority of the net proceeds of any Excluded Event to the advancement of one or both of the Projects, the Company shall promptly notify the Investor in writing and the Investor shall have the right to purchase an amount of Offered Securities at the time of the next Offering sufficient to increase its percentage holding of securities to the Participating Percentage in effect immediately prior to the completion of such Excluded Event at a price per security equal to the price under such Excluded Event, and the Company shall, if it is required by the Exchange or otherwise under Applicable Laws to seek shareholder approval for the Offering of the securities to the Investor or its nominee, call and hold a meeting of its shareholders to consider the Offering of the securities to the Investor as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event, such meeting shall be held within 75 days of the date that the Company is first advised that it will require shareholder approval, in which case the Company shall recommend approval of the Offering of the securities and shall solicit proxies in support thereof.

 

 

- 13 -

 

Article 4
Representations AND Warranties

 

4.1 Representations and Warranties of the Company

 

The Company represents and warrants to the Investor as follows and acknowledges and agrees that the Investor is relying on such representations and warranties to enter into this Agreement:

 

(a) Organization and Status. The Company is duly incorporated and organized, and is validly subsisting, under the laws of Canada and is up-to-date in the filing of all corporate and similar returns under the laws of that jurisdiction.

 

(b) Corporate Power. The Company has all necessary corporate power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder.

 

(c) Authorization. All necessary corporate action has been taken by the Company to authorize the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance of its obligations hereunder.

 

(d) Enforceability. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Company and (assuming due execution and delivery by the Investor) constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as that enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency and other similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and except that equitable remedies may be granted only in the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction.

 

(e) Absence of Conflict. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company and the performance by the Company of its obligations hereunder will not (whether after the passage of time or notice or both) conflict with, result in a violation or breach of, constitute a default or require any Consent (other than such as has already been obtained) to be obtained under, or give rise to any termination rights or payment obligation under, any provision of:

 

(i) to the knowledge of the Company, (i) any judgment, decree, order or award of any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over it, or (ii) any Applicable Law;

 

(ii) any provision of its Constating Documents or resolutions of its board of directors (or any committee thereof) or shareholders; or

 

(iii) any license or registration or any agreement, contract or commitment, written or oral which the Company is a party or subject to or bound by.

 

(f) Terms of Participation Right. As at the date hereof, other than as disclosed to the Investor, the Company has not granted to any Person a participation right in respect of any Offering (a “Third Party Participation Right”) on terms that are more favourable to such Person than the terms of the Participation Right under Article 3 are to the Investor.

 

 

- 14 -

 

4.2 Representations and Warranties of the Investor

 

The Investor represents and warrants to the Company as follows and acknowledges and agrees that the Company is relying on such representations and warranties to enter into this Agreement:

 

(a) Organization and Status. The Investor is duly incorporated and organized, and is validly subsisting, under the laws of Ontario and is up-to-date in the filing of all corporate and similar returns under the laws of that jurisdiction.

 

(b) Corporate Power. The Investor has all necessary corporate power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder.

 

(c) Authorization. All necessary corporate action has been taken by the Investor to authorize the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance of its obligations hereunder.

 

(d) Enforceability. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Investor and (assuming due execution and delivery by the Company) constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Investor, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as that enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency and other similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and except that equitable remedies may be granted only in the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction.

 

(e) Absence of Conflict. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Investor and the performance by the Investor of its obligations hereunder will not (whether after the passage of time or notice or both) conflict with, result in a violation or breach of, constitute a default or require any Consent (other than such as has already been obtained) to be obtained under, or give rise to any termination rights or payment obligation under, any provision of:

 

(i) to the knowledge of the Investor, any judgment, decree, order or award of any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over it;

 

(ii) any provision of its Constating Documents or resolutions of its board of directors (or any committee thereof) or shareholders; or

 

(iii) any license or registration or any agreement, contract or commitment, written or oral which the Investor is a party or subject to or bound by.

 

Article 5
Covenants of the Company

 

5.1 Reporting Issuer Status and Listing of Common Shares

 

The Company shall, for a period of two years from the date hereof, use commercially reasonable efforts to:

 

(a) maintain the Company’s status as a “reporting issuer” not in default under the Canadian Securities Laws in each of the Reporting Jurisdictions; and

 

 

- 15 -

 

(b) maintain the listing of the Common Shares on the TSX or another stock exchange in North America,

 

provided that these covenants shall not restrict or prevent the Company from engaging in or completing any transaction which would result in the Company ceasing to be a “reporting issuer” or the Common Shares ceasing to be listed on any of the foregoing stock exchanges so long as the holders of Common Shares receive cash or securities of an entity which is listed on any of the foregoing stock exchanges or the holders of the Common Shares have approved the transaction.

 

5.2 No Conflict With Shareholders’ Rights Plan

  

The Company covenants and agrees that any shareholder rights plan or similar instrument adopted by the Company shall not restrict, limit, prohibit or conflict with the exercise by the Investor of its Participation Right or Top-up Right.

 

5.3 Subsidiary Security Issuances

 

Other than pursuant to the Camino Rojo Option Agreement, the Company shall not agree to, undertake or cause, or permit to occur, any offering, sale, transfer or issuance of any securities of any subsidiary to any Person other than the Company or an Affiliate of the Company. The Company shall cause its subsidiaries to conduct their business and affairs in a manner consistent with, and so as to give full effect to, all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

 

5.4 Grant of Additional Third Party Participation Rights

 

If the Participating Percentage is at least 5.0% and the Company grants to any Person a Third Party Participation Right on terms that are more favourable to such Person than the terms of the Participation Right under Article 3 are to the Investor, the Company shall promptly, but no later than three Business Days after granting such Third Party Participation Right: (i) notify the Investor in writing of such Third Party Participation Right; and (ii) offer to amend the terms of this Agreement to provide the Investor with a participation right that is substantially equivalent to the Third Party Participation Right.

 

Article 6
COVENANTS OF the INVESTOR

 

6.1 Investor Voting

 

The Investor agrees, for a period of 18 months from the date hereof, that it shall use commercially reasonable efforts to, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its Affiliates to, vote (or cause to be voted) all of the Common Shares held by it from time to time at any meeting of the shareholders, and in any action by written consent of the shareholders, in accordance with the recommendations of the Board or management of the Company on all matters to be submitted to the shareholders in connection with such meeting or action including, but not limited to, voting the Common Shares for the election of management’s nominees for directors of the Company, except in the case of voting or actions by written consent in respect of, in connection with or related to:

 

 

- 16 -

 

(a) any issuer bid, insider bid, related party transaction or business combination within the meaning of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions or any take-over bid within the meaning of National Instrument 62-104 – Take-Over Bids and Issuer Bids;

 

(b) any amendment to the Constating Documents of the Company, other than immaterial changes that are administrative in nature;

 

(c) any matter in relation to which a recognized proxy advisor is recommending against the recommendation of management of the Company or the Board on any resolution of shareholders;

 

(d) any disposition of: (i) the Company’s direct or indirect interest in either of the Projects; or (ii) assets for consideration equal to or greater than 50% of the market capitalization of the Company immediately prior to the entering into of such transaction;

 

(e) any proposed distribution of Common Shares or Convertible Securities where the number of Common Shares issued or issuable thereunder is greater than 25% of the Common Shares which are outstanding (on a non-diluted basis) immediately prior to the closing thereof; or

 

(f) in any circumstances where:

 

(i) the Company, its Affiliates or their respective directors and officers are not in compliance with this Agreement; or

 

(ii) the Company, its Affiliates or their respective directors and officers are not in compliance with all Applicable Laws (including, without limitation, applicable Canadian Securities Laws or the rules and policies of the Exchange), except for immaterial non-compliance on an isolated basis that is cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the Investor within 30 days,

 

in which case the Investor shall be entitled to vote its Common Shares at its sole discretion. For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, any Investor Nominee on the Board will not be required to vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board or management of the Company but will exercise his or her fiduciary responsibilities as a director by voting as he or she sees fit (and which discretionary voting will not, for the avoidance of doubt, be considered a breach of this Section 6.1).

 

6.2 Share Dispositions

 

(a)            Subject to Sections 6.2(b) and 6.2(c), for so long as the Participating Percentage is at least 5.0%, if the Investor or its Affiliates wish to sell more than 5% of the then issued and outstanding Common Shares in one transaction or a series of related transactions (a “Proposed Private Sale”), then:

 

(i) the Investor shall give written notice to the Company of the Proposed Private Sale (the “Sale Notice”), which Sale Notice shall contain the total number of Common Shares proposed to be sold pursuant to the Proposed Private Sale and any other terms and conditions of such sale;

 

 

- 17 -

 

(ii) except in circumstances where such designation is not reasonably possible or is not permitted by law, the Company shall have the right to designate, by notice in writing to the Investor (the “Purchaser Notice”) within five Business Days following delivery of the Sale Notice (the “Sale Period”) a single purchaser (a “Private Sale Purchaser”) who shall be acceptable to the Company and the Investor, each acting reasonably, and capable of closing, and willing to close, the Proposed Private Sale on the terms set out in the Sale Notice within eight Business Days of the receipt of the Purchaser Notice by the Investor;

 

(iii) the Investor shall in good faith negotiate with the Private Sale Purchaser a price and the other transaction terms for the Proposed Private Sale within three Business Days following receipt of the Purchaser Notice by the Investor;

 

(iv) in the event that a Purchaser Notice is delivered by the Company and the requirements set out in Sections 6.2(a)(ii) and 6.2(a)(iii) are satisfied, the Investor shall be required to complete the Proposed Private Sale with the Private Sale Purchaser; and

 

(v) in the event that the Company fails to designate a Private Sale Purchaser within the Sale Period, or the requirements of Sections 6.2(a)(ii) and 6.2(a)(iii) are otherwise not satisfied, then the Investor may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of the Common Shares that were the subject of the applicable Sale Notice without any restriction or limitation, provided that if the Investor does not complete the Proposed Private Sale (or an alternative disposition transaction) within 120 days of the date of the Sale Notice, the provisions of this Section 6.2 shall again apply.

 

(b)            Subject to 6.2(c), the Investor shall not, without the prior consent of the Company, sell Common Shares if, to the knowledge of the Investor (after reasonable inquiry in the case of a private transaction) the purchaser, together with its Affiliates and any Person acting jointly and in concert with the purchaser (within the meaning of applicable Canadian Securities Laws), would as a result of such sale acquire more than 19.99% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares as of the closing of such sale.

 

(c)            Sections 6.2(a) and 6.2(b) do not apply to:

 

(i) sales by the Investor of Common Shares through the facilities of the TSX;

 

(ii) Transfers by the Investor of Common Shares to an Affiliate of the Investor, provided that such Affiliate agrees in writing to be bound by this Agreement (in which case the Affiliate will also be entitled to the Investor’s rights under this Agreement);

 

(iii) dispositions of Common Shares by the Investor pursuant to: (A) a take-over bid for which a circular has been delivered to shareholders of the Company in accordance with Canadian Securities Laws or other Applicable Laws, or (B) in connection with a statutory arrangement or other business combination involving the Company; or

 

 

- 18 -

 

(iv) the grant of any encumbrance in respect of all or part of the Common Shares and any Transfer of any such Common Shares by reason of the exercise of any rights, powers or remedies under or in relation to such encumbrance.

 

Article 7
MISCELLANEOUS

 

7.1 Termination of Existing Agreements

 

The Investor and the Company hereby agree that the Participation Right Agreement and the Technical Services Agreement are hereby terminated as of the date hereof, without affecting the validity of, or rights and obligations of the parties arising in connection with, any action taken by the Investor or the Company in accordance with such agreements prior to the date hereof.

 

7.2 Termination

 

This Agreement, other than the rights and obligations of the parties under Section 7.4, shall terminate and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall cease immediately at such time as the Investor ceases to hold Common Shares representing at least 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares. The rights and obligations of the parties under Section 7.4 shall terminate on the date the Investor ceases to hold any Common Shares or Convertible Securities.

 

7.3 Right to Information

 

From and after the date hereof, at the request of the Investor, the Company shall provide the Investor with monthly exploration reports updating the status of the Company’s work programs on the Projects including, but not limited, reasonable access to the Company’s scientific and technical data, work plans and programs, permitting information and results of operations. The Company shall not be obligated to provide a monthly exploration report if one has not been prepared for internal use. Following the delivery of each report the Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to respond to reasonable questions and inquiries from the Investor with respect to the report and the contents thereof. The Investor agrees to treat all information provided to it pursuant to this Section 7.3 (whether disclosed in writing, orally, visually, electronically or by any other means) as Evaluation Material (as such term is defined in the Confidentiality Agreement) in accordance with the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement.

 

7.4 Technical Assistance

 

The parties acknowledge that the Investor or its Affiliates may be requested, from time to time, to provide technical assistance, advice, information or services (collectively, the “Technical Assistance”) to the Company relating to one or more of the Company’s mineral projects. Subject to any written agreement between the parties to the contrary, in connection with the provision of any such Technical Assistance by the Investor or its Affiliates, the Company hereby acknowledges and agrees as follows:

 

(a) the Investor and its Affiliates are under no obligation to provide any Technical Assistance to the Company and may cease providing Technical Assistance at any time or from time to time;

 

 

- 19 -

 

(b) neither the Investor nor its Affiliates will receive any remuneration in consideration for the provision of any Technical Assistance to the Company;

 

(c) without the prior written consent of the Investor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, the Company shall not, in any communication or agreement with a third party or in any public statement or publicly filed or disseminated document of the Company: (i) describe or refer to any Technical Assistance requested from or provided by the Investor or its Affiliates; or (ii) refer to the Investor or any of its Affiliates by name;

 

(d) the Investor and its Affiliates expressly disclaim and make no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or reliability of any Technical Assistance, and the Company will use the Technical Assistance at the Company’s own risk;

 

(e) in no event shall the Investor, any of its Affiliates or any of their respective directors, officers, employees or agents be liable for any indirect, special, consequential, incidental or punitive damages of any sort, loss of profits, failure to realize expected savings, loss of revenues or loss of use of any properties or capital, whether or not any such damages or claims were foreseeable, relating to, in connection with or arising out of the provision by the Investor or any of its Affiliates of Technical Assistance to the Company; and

 

(f) the Company agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Investor and each of its Affiliates, and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents (each, an “Indemnified Party”), to the full extent lawful, from and against any and all expenses, losses, claims (including shareholder actions, derivative or otherwise), actions, suits, proceedings, damages and liabilities, joint or several, including the aggregate amount paid in reasonable settlement of any actions, suits, proceedings, investigations or claims and the reasonable fees and expenses of their counsel that may be incurred in advising with respect to and/or defending any action, suit, proceeding, investigation or claim that may be made or threatened against any Indemnified Party or in enforcing this indemnity or to which any Indemnified Party may become subject or otherwise involved in any capacity under any statute or common law or otherwise (collectively, “Losses”) insofar as such Losses relate to, are caused by, result from, arise out of or are based upon, directly or indirectly, the provision of Technical Assistance by the Investor or its Affiliates. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company is not obligated to indemnify or hold harmless the Indemnified Party for any Losses if such Losses arise out of or result from the Indemnified Party’s negligence, wilful misconduct, fraud or criminal activity.

 

 

- 20 -

 

7.5 Notices

 

(a)            Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person, transmitted by e-mail or similar means of recorded electronic communication or sent by registered mail, charges prepaid, addressed as follows:

 

  (i) in the case of the Investor:
    Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
    145 King Street East, Suite 500
    Toronto, ON M5C 2Y7
     
    Attention: Carol Plummer, Vice President Corporate Development
    E-mail: [personal information redacted] with a copy to
      [personal information redacted]
       
    with a copy to:
     
    Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP
    155 Wellington Street West
    Toronto, ON M5V 3J7
     
    Attention: Patricia Olasker
    E-mail: [personal information redacted]
       
  (ii) in the case of the Company:
     
    Orla Mining Ltd.
    202-595 Howe Street
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 2T5
     
    Attention: Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer
    E-mail: [personal information redacted]
       
    with a copy to:
     
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Suite 2200, 885 West Georgia Street
    Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
     
    Attention: Jen Hansen
    E-mail: [personal information redacted]

 

(b)            Any such notice or other communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the day on which it was delivered or transmitted (or, if such day is not a Business Day or if delivery or transmission is made on a Business Day after 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) at the place of receipt, then on the next following Business Day) or, if mailed, on the third Business Day following the date of mailing; provided, however, that if at the time of mailing or within three Business Days thereafter there is or occurs a labour dispute or other event which might reasonably be expected to disrupt the delivery of documents by mail, any notice or other communication hereunder shall be delivered or transmitted by means of recorded electronic communication as aforesaid.

 

(c)            Either party may at any time change its address for service from time to time by giving notice to the other party in accordance with this Section 7.5.

 

 

- 21 -

 

7.6 Amendments and Waivers

 

No amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be binding on either party unless consented to in writing by such party. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor shall any waiver of any provision of this Agreement constitute a continuing waiver unless otherwise expressly provided.

 

7.7 Assignment

 

No party may assign any of its rights or benefits under this Agreement, or delegate any of its duties or obligations, except with the prior written consent of the other party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Investor may assign and transfer all of its rights, benefits, duties and obligations under this Agreement in their entirety, without the consent of the Company, to an Affiliate of the Investor, provided that any such assignee shall, prior to any such transfer, agree to be bound by all of the covenants of the Investor contained herein and comply with the provisions of this Agreement, and shall deliver to the Company a duly executed undertaking to such effect in form and substance satisfactory to the Company, acting reasonably.

 

7.8 Successors and Assigns

 

This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and shall be binding on and enforceable by and against the parties and their respective successors or heirs, executors, administrators and other legal personal representatives, and permitted assigns.

 

7.9 Expenses

 

Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, each party will pay for its own costs and expenses incurred in connection with the negotiation, preparation, execution and performance of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated herein, including the fees and expenses of legal counsel, financial advisors, accountants, consultants and other professional advisors.

 

7.10 Public Disclosure

 

The Company shall not issue any press release or publicly filed or disseminated document referencing, in any way, the Investor, unless: (i) the Company has obtained the Investor’s prior written consent to such disclosure, which consent shall not be unreasonably delayed or withheld; or (ii) the Company determines that such disclosure is required by Applicable Law. In addition, the Company shall provide the Investor with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on each press release or publicly filed or disseminated document of the Company relating or referencing, in any way, the Investor, this Agreement or the transactions contemplated herein prior to the issuance thereof and incorporate any comments provided by the Investor, to the extent commercially reasonable. For greater certainty, the Investor hereby consents to the Company filing a copy of this Agreement on SEDAR, if required.

 

7.11 Further Assurances

 

Each of the parties shall, from time to time hereafter and upon any reasonable request of the other, promptly do, execute, deliver or cause to be done, executed and delivered all further acts, documents and things as may be required or necessary for the purposes of giving effect to this Agreement.

 

 

- 22 -

 

7.12 Right to Injunctive Relief

 

The parties agree that any breach of the terms of this Agreement by either party would result in immediate and irreparable injury and damage to the other party which could not be adequately compensated by damages. The parties therefore also agree that in the event of any such breach or any anticipated or threatened breach by the defaulting party, the other party shall be entitled to equitable relief, including by way of temporary or permanent injunction or specific performance, without having to prove damages, in addition to any other remedies (including damages) to which such other party may be entitled at law or in equity.

 

7.13 Counterparts

 

This Agreement and all documents contemplated by or delivered under or in connection with this Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, with the same effect as if each party had signed and delivered the same document, and all counterparts shall be construed together to be an original and will constitute one and the same agreement.

 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows.]

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by the parties on the date first written above.

 

 

  Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
   
   
  by (Signed) “Carol Plummer”
    Name: Carol Plummer
    Title: Vice-President, Corporate Development

 

 

  ORLA MINING LTD.
   
   
  by (Signed) “Etienne Morin”
    Name: Etienne Morin
    Title: Chief Financial Officer

 

Signature Page – Investor Rights Agreement

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.53

 

Trinity Capital Partners Corporation
45 Hazelton Street, Suite C
Toronto, Ontario, M5R 2E3

 

 

October 20, 2019

 

Orla Mining Ltd.
202-595 Howe Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 2T5

 

RE: COMMITMENT LETTER

 

Dear Sirs:

 

Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (the “Arranging Lender”) is pleased to confirm to you, Orla Mining Ltd. (“you” or the “Borrower”) its commitment to provide, arrange and syndicate a loan facility in your favour in an aggregate principal amount of U.S.$125,000,000 (the “Loan Facility”) upon and subject to the terms and conditions set forth or referred to in this commitment letter (the “Commitment Letter”) and in the Secured Debt Financing Term Sheet attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Term Sheet”, and together with the Commitment Letter, the “Commitment Papers”). Capitalized terms used herein without express definition shall have the same meanings as are assigned to them in the Term Sheet.

 

In that regard, and without limiting the generality of the preceding paragraph, the Arranging Lender confirms that the Arranging Lender [commercially sensitive information redacted], Pierre Lassonde or an affiliate of Pierre Lassonde [commercially sensitive information redacted], and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited or an affiliate thereof [commercially sensitive information redacted] (together, the “First Tranche Lenders”), are committed to fund the First Tranche upon and subject to the terms and conditions set forth or referred to in the Commitment Papers.

 

The Arranging Lender agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to arrange a syndicate of banks, financial institutions, institutional lenders and investors (the “Lenders”) that will participate in the Loan Facility. The Arranging Lender shall not be permitted to syndicate the Loan Facility if such syndication would require regulatory or shareholder approval under applicable securities laws or the requirements of the Toronto Stock Exchange; provided that, in such event, the Lenders shall not be required to advance any portion of the Second Tranche or Third Tranche. For avoidance of doubt, syndication is not a condition of funding the First Tranche nor a condition of the commitment of the First Tranche Lenders to fund the First Tranche.

 

In consideration for the Arranging Lender’s agreement to perform its obligations as described herein, the Borrower hereby covenants and agrees to comply with the terms and conditions set out below and in the Term Sheet.

 

1. The Borrower acknowledges and confirms that it has been advised that the Arranging Lender intends to promptly syndicate the Loan Facility to a group of lenders, including (without limitation) itself and the other parties listed above (collectively, the “Lenders”).

 

 

- 2 -

 

2. To assist the Arranging Lender in completing its syndication efforts and satisfying the conditions to providing the Loan as set out in the Commitment Papers, the Borrower agrees to promptly upon request prepare and provide to the Arranging Lender all information with respect to the Borrower and its affiliates reasonably requested in connection therewith, including all financial information as the Arranging Lender may reasonably request in connection with the arrangement and syndication of the Loan Facility. For avoidance of doubt, arrangement and syndication is not a condition of funding the First Tranche nor a condition of the commitment of the First Tranche Lenders to fund the First Tranche. The Borrower hereby represents, warrants, and covenants that (a) all written or formally-presented information with respect to the Borrower, its subsidiaries, and their respective assets (the “Information”), other than projections, that has been or will be made available to the Arranging Lender by the Borrower, its affiliates or any of their advisors or representatives, is or will be, when furnished, complete and correct in all material respects and does not or will not, when furnished, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements contained therein not materially misleading in light of the circumstances under which such statements are made and (b) all projections that have been or will be made available to the Arranging Lender by the Borrower, its affiliates or any of their advisors or representatives have been or will be prepared in good faith based upon assumptions that it believes are reasonable at the time made and at the time the related projections are made available to the Arranging Lender (it being understood and agreed that no assurance can be given that the projections will be realized and that actual results may materially differ from such projections). Borrower understands that in arranging and syndicating the Loan Facility, all Lenders will use and rely on the Information without independent verification thereof.

 

3. As consideration for the Arranging Lender’s commitment hereunder and the Arranging Lender’s agreement to perform the services described herein, the Borrower agrees to pay to the Arranging Lender the non-refundable Commitment Fee, for the account of all Lenders on a pro rata basis, at the time and in the amount specified in the Term Sheet.

 

4. The Arranging Lender’s commitment hereunder and its agreement to perform the services described herein are subject to (a) the Arranging Lender’s satisfaction that from the date hereof and during the syndication of the Loan Facility (including, without limitation, any period of time required to complete the initial syndication after Closing) there shall be no competing offering, placement or arrangement of any debt securities or bank financing by or on behalf of the Borrower, or any affiliate thereof (excluding (i) the proposed working capital facility referenced in the Term Sheet [commercially sensitive information redacted] and (ii) the equipment financing referenced in the Term Sheet) without the prior written consent of the Arranging Lender, failing which the Arranging Lender reserves the right to terminate the commitments hereunder (and thereafter, the Arranging Lender shall have no further obligation under the Commitment Papers or in connection with the Loan Facility), (b) the negotiation, execution and delivery of definitive documentation referred to in the Term Sheet on terms satisfactory to the Arranging Lender and its counsel, in each case acting reasonably, within 90 days from the execution of this Commitment Letter, and (c) the other conditions set forth or referred to in the Term Sheet; provided that the Arranging Lender acknowledges and confirms that the First Tranche Lenders shall be required to fund their portion of the First Tranche upon satisfaction of the conditions precedent indicated as conditions for drawing of the First Tranche under paragraph (a) in “Conditions Precedent to Closing” in the Term Sheet, and not the balance of the Definitive Documentation.

 

 

- 3 -

 

5. The Borrower agrees to (a) indemnify and hold harmless the Lenders, each of their respective affiliates and their respective shareholders, officers, directors, employees, advisors, and agents (each, an “indemnified person”) from and against any and all losses, claims, damages and liabilities to which any such indemnified person may become subject arising out of or in connection with this Commitment Papers, the Loan Facility, the use of the proceeds thereof, or any claim, litigation, investigation or proceeding relating to any of the foregoing, regardless of whether such indemnified person is a party thereto, and to reimburse each indemnified person upon demand for any reasonable legal or other expenses incurred in connection with investigating or defending any of the foregoing, provided that the foregoing indemnity will not, as to an indemnified person, apply to (i) losses, claims, damages, liabilities or related expenses to the extent they are found by a final, non-appealable judgement of a court to arise directly from the willful misconduct or gross negligence or fraud of such indemnified person, (ii) loss of profit, income, revenue or business opportunities, (iii) disputes solely between or among indemnified persons and (iv) the failure of an indemnified person to perform its obligations hereunder and (b) upon presentation of a summary statement, to reimburse the Arranging Lender and its affiliates on demand for all reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expenses (including reasonable and documented due diligence expenses, syndication expenses, consultant’s fees and expenses, travel expenses and fees, charges and disbursements of counsel) in each case, incurred in connection with the Loan Facility, and the preparation of any related documentation (including this Commitment Letter, the Term Sheet, and the Definitive Documentation) or the administration, amendment, modification or waiver thereof. No indemnified person shall be liable for any damages arising from the use by unauthorized persons of Information or other materials sent through electronic, telecommunications or other information transmission systems that are intercepted by such unauthorized persons, other than as a result of the gross negligence, criminal act or wilful misconduct of the indemnified person and provided such indemnified person has complied in all material respects with the protection protocols in place for dealing with their own confidential information or for any special, indirect, consequential or punitive damages in connection with the Loan Facility. For the purposes hereof, “person” means any natural person, corporation, firm, partnership, joint venture, joint stock company, incorporated or unincorporated association, government, governmental agency or any other entity, whether acting in an individual, fiduciary or other capacity. The provisions contained in this paragraph shall remain in full force and effect for any of the foregoing losses, claims, damages, liabilities, costs and expenses arising within a period of two years from the date hereof notwithstanding the termination of this Commitment Letter or the commitments hereunder in accordance with Section 5 hereof, but shall be superseded by the applicable provisions of the Definitive Documentation upon the execution thereof, provided that the reimbursement obligation set forth in part (b) above shall apply only to expenses incurred prior to the earlier of (i) the date of the Definitive Documentation and (ii) the date this Commitment Letter is terminated.

 

6. The Borrower acknowledges that the Arranging Lender and its affiliates may be providing debt financing, equity capital or other services (including financial advisory services, which for certainty includes providing such services to the Borrower in respect of the proposed transaction) to other companies in respect of which the Borrower may have conflicting interests regarding the Loan Facility and otherwise. The Arranging Lender will not use confidential information obtained from the Borrower by virtue of the Loan Facility or its other relationships with the Borrower in connection with the performance by the Arranging Lender of services for other companies, and the Arranging Lender will not furnish any such information to other companies. The Borrower also acknowledges that the Arranging Lender has no obligation to use in connection with the Loan Facility, or to furnish to the Borrower, confidential information obtained from other companies.

 

7. This Commitment Letter (a) shall not be assignable by the Borrower without the prior written consent of the Arranging Lender (and any purported assignment without such consent shall be null and void), (b) shall not be assignable by the Arranging Lender without the prior written consent of the Borrower (and any purported assignment without such consent shall be null and void); provided that, in connection with the syndication of the Loan Facility, additional persons may adhere to this Commitment Letter, and (c) is intended to be solely for the benefit of the Borrower and is not intended to confer any benefits upon, or create any rights in favour of, any person other than the parties hereto. This Commitment Letter may not be amended nor waived except by an instrument in writing signed by the parties hereto. This Commitment Letter may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to constitute an original, and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one agreement. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Commitment Letter by facsimile or electronic mail transmission in PDF format shall be as effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart hereof. This Commitment Letter and the Term Sheet herein are the only agreements that have been entered into with respect to the Loan Facility as at the date hereof and set forth the entire understanding of the parties with respect thereto. This Commitment Letter shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein.

 

 

- 4 -

 

8. Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing by the Arranging Lender, the compensation, reimbursement and indemnification provisions contained herein shall remain in full force and effect until the earlier of (a) the date of execution and delivery of the Definitive Documentation and (b) the date that is two years from the date hereof, notwithstanding the termination of this Commitment Letter or the Arranging Lender’s commitment hereunder in accordance with Section 5 hereof.

 

REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

 

 

- 5 -

 

If the foregoing correctly sets forth our agreement, please indicate your acceptance of the terms hereof and of the Term Sheet by returning to the Arranging Lender an executed counterpart hereof not later than 4:00 p.m. Toronto time, on October 20, 2019. The Arranging Lender’s commitment expressed herein will expire at such time in the event the Arranging Lender has not received such executed counterpart in accordance with the immediately preceding sentence.

 

Yours very truly,

 

TRINITY CAPITAL PARTNERS CORPORATION

 

 
By: /s/ “John Graham”  
  Title: Partner  
     
By: /s/ “Ron D'Ambrosio”  
  Title: Partner  

 

Accepted and Agreed to this 20th day of October, 2019

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

 
By: /s/ “Etienne Morin”  
  Title: Chief Financial Officer  
     
By: /s/ “Jason Simpson”  
  Title: Chief Executive Officer  

 

 

 

Exhibit A

 

Orla Mining Limited: Secured Debt Financing Term Sheet

 

Trinity Capital Partners Corporation through one or more of its affiliates is pleased to offer you its commitment to arrange or provide financing to Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Borrower”) in an amount of US$125,000,000 upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth or referred to in this Term Sheet (the “Term Sheet”), including the conditions precedent set out herein, as well as completion of satisfactory due diligence and negotiation of definitive transaction documentation (the “Definitive Documentation”), in form and substance satisfactory to the Borrower and the Lender (as hereinafter defined).

 

Summary of Principal Terms

 

Borrower Orla Mining Ltd., a company incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act.
Agent [Agent/Collateral Agent to be agreed by the Parties].
Lenders Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital” or the “Arranging Lender”) and/or its affiliates or investors, together with other lending parties (collectively, the “Lenders”, and individually, a “Lender”).
Currency United States Dollars.
Loan US$125,000,000 (the “Loan”).
Interest Rate 8.80% per annum interest payable quarterly in cash in arrears and calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months, subject to a 2.00% increase while there exists any default or event of default.
Loan Warrants 32.5 million common share purchase warrants with a C$3.00 per share exercise price and a 7-year exercise period from the time of issue (the “Warrants”).  The Warrants shall be issued and delivered upon Closing, provided that should a Change of Control occur prior to Closing, the Warrants shall be deemed to have been issued immediately prior to such Change of Control.  In the event drawdown of the First Tranche occurs prior to Closing, 20% of the Warrants shall be issued and delivered upon drawdown, with the balance issuable on Closing.  The issuance of the Warrants is subject to regulatory approvals.
Drawdown

The Borrower may draw up to US$25,000,000 of the Loan (the “First Tranche”) at any time from and after the date of the Commitment Letter (to which this Term Sheet is attached) upon satisfaction of the conditions precedent set out under paragraph (a) in “Conditions to Closing” below (including, for greater certainty, the granting of security set out under “Security” as conditions for drawing of the First Tranche, and for greater certainty, the balance of the Definitive Documentation would not be required in connection with the First Tranche). This will facilitate the ordering of long lead items and working capital needs prior to receipt of environmental permits. In the event that the First Tranche is drawn prior to the Closing Date, the First Tranche will be repayable on demand if an Event of Default occurs, be evidenced by a promissory note(s) and be secured by the documents specified below under “Security” as conditions for drawing of the First Tranche.

 

1

 

 

 

 The remaining portion of the Loan (the “Second Tranche” and “Third Tranche”) shall be available under two drawdowns of US$50,000,000 each after the Borrower (i) has provided evidence of net cash proceeds of US$45,000,000 of additional capital, which cannot be redeemed, retracted or repaid, and on which no fixed payments are required to be made, while the Loan remains outstanding (from the date hereof) (the “Additional Equity”, and together with the Loan, the “Additional Capital”), (ii) has received all permits necessary for the commencement of the construction and development of Camino Rojo (as defined below) and the Arranging Lender is satisfied (acting reasonably) that the Borrower will obtain all necessary permits for the continued construction, development and operation of Camino Rojo, (iii) has received all corporate, shareholder and other approvals necessary for, and has determined that it will proceed with, the commencement of the construction of Camino Rojo and (iv) has satisfied all of the Conditions Precedent to Closing and Conditions Precedent to Draws. The Third Tranche must be drawn within 6 months of the Second Tranche.  

 

Each drawdown shall be subject to 10 business days’ written notice to the Agent.

Ranking The Loan will rank senior to all existing and subsequent debt, and the liens securing the Loan will have a first priority, over all assets as described under “Security” below, of the Borrower and the Restricted Subsidiaries (subject to specified prior ranking Permitted Encumbrances to be agreed).
Security

The Loan shall be guaranteed by all subsidiaries of the Borrower that either have, or acquire in the future, a direct or indirect interest in: (i) the Camino Rojo project, which shall include, for greater certainty all present and after acquired real and personal property relating to the Camino Rojo project [commercially sensitive information redacted]; or (ii) the Cerro Quema property in Panama (“Cerro Quema”) (together, the “Restricted Subsidiaries”) and shall be secured by all assets of the Borrower and the Restricted Subsidiaries, provided that mortgage/real property security (including, without limitation, with respect to mining claims) shall only be required in connection with Camino Rojo on Closing, and thereafter will be required on any additional real property owned or leased by the Borrower or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries related to Camino Rojo. For greater certainty (x) mortgage/real property security shall not be required on any actual real property until such time as an interest in such real property has been acquired by the Borrower or its Restricted Subsidiaries, and (y) the Loan will be secured by a pledge of all securities of the Restricted Subsidiaries and any subsidiaries that become Restricted Subsidiaries in the future, and all present and after-acquired property of the Borrower and any Restricted Subsidiaries (other than mortgage/real property security over real property that is not related to Camino Rojo).

 

2

 

 

 

Drawing of the First Tranche shall require delivery of all guarantees, a general security agreement executed by the Borrower and each of the Restricted Subsidiaries, pledges of all securities and accounts, and intercompany subordination agreements, in each case governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario and the Federal laws of Canada applicable therein.   

 

Full foreign and asset security as described above to be in place before drawdown of the Second Tranche.

Permitted Encumbrances

•       Equipment financing secured by the equipment so financed (and proceeds thereof (including applicable insurance proceeds)) [commercially sensitive information redacted].

 

•      Working capital facility [commercially sensitive information redacted] ranking first on accounts receivable and inventory and subordinate to the Lenders in all other respects, in form and substance satisfactory to the Majority Lenders, acting reasonably, and subject to an intercreditor agreement on terms satisfactory to the Majority Lenders, acting reasonably.

 

•      Foreign exchange hedging, subject to an intercreditor arrangement satisfactory to the Majority Lenders, acting reasonably.

 

•      Other additional non-financial ordinary course encumbrances which do not materially affect the use or the value of the asset subject thereto.

[Commercially sensitive information redacted] [Commercially sensitive information redacted].
Closing Date The execution of the Definitive Documentation (the “Closing Date”) is targeted for November 2019.  Dates are to be mutually agreed between the Borrower and the Majority Lenders.
Maturity Date 5 years following the Closing Date (the “Maturity Date”), including in respect of the First Tranche if it is drawn in advance of the satisfaction of all Conditions Precedent to Closing.  All amounts outstanding under the Loan are to be repaid in one payment at the Maturity Date.

 

3

 

 

Use of Proceeds Proceeds from the Additional Capital shall be used to fund the construction and/or development of Camino Rojo (including early project works, purchasing long-lead items, and working capital needs related to Camino Rojo), [commercially sensitive information redacted], and to fund the normal course general and administrative expenses consistent with previous practice of the Borrower and the Restricted Subsidiaries; provided that no such proceeds may be used to fund the exploration, development or construction of Cerro Quema.  For greater certainty, the aforementioned proceeds may not be used in connection with the acquisition, development, construction or operation of or investment in any mine, property or business that will not be subject to the security set out under “Security”.
Definitive Documentation The Definitive Documentation shall be satisfactory to the Borrower and the Majority Lenders, each acting reasonably, and will include a loan agreement containing, inter alia, in addition to the specific terms set out herein, customary representations and warranties, additional customary positive and negative covenants as the Majority Lenders may reasonably require following completion of their due diligence, and such other customary loan agreement provisions (e.g., customary indemnification provisions, tax provisions, etc.) as the Majority Lenders may reasonably require as well as security documents and warrant documents, in each case in substance consistent with this Term Sheet.
Voluntary Prepayment The Borrower shall have the ability to repay the Loan, in full or in part, at any time without cost if the Loan is repaid with cash flow from operations.  Prepayments made with third-party debt funding, public market equity or with proceeds from warrant exercises will be subject to a 2.0% premium on the principal amount prepaid payable at the time of prepayment.

Change of Control

Upon completion of a Change of Control, the outstanding principal amount of the Loan shall be repaid, together with a 2.0% premium and all accrued and unpaid interest.

 

“Change of Control” means, with respect to any person, (y) the consummation of any transaction, including any consolidation, arrangement, amalgamation or merger or any issue, transfer or acquisition of voting shares, the result of which is that any other person or group of other persons acting jointly or in concert for purposes of such transaction becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the voting shares of such person; or (z) if, after the Closing Date, in any twelve (12) month consecutive period, Continuing Directors cease to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors of the Borrower. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it shall not be a Change of Control where Trinity Capital or any affiliate thereof acquires control of the applicable person.

 

“Continuing Directors” means (a) any member of the Board of Directors who was a director of the Borrower on the Closing Date, and (b) any individual who becomes a member of the Board of Directors after the Closing Date if such individual was approved, appointed or nominated for the election to the Board of Directors by a majority of the Continuing Directors.

 

4

 

 

Events of Default

The following shall be the events of default for the Loan (with corresponding and customary remedies):

 

•     Payment defaults (subject to a 3 business day cure period);

 

•     Any representation or warranty in any of the Definitive Documentation shall prove to have been incorrect in any material respect when made or deemed to be made and, if capable of being remedied, shall fail to be remedied within twenty (20) days from the earlier of (i) the Agent or any Lender providing written notice thereof to the Borrower or (ii) the Borrower becoming aware of the incorrect representation and warranty;

 

•     Breach of covenants (subject to a 20 day cure period for covenants other than negative covenants, financial covenants, and any other covenants that contain a time-period in their terms);

 

•     Customary cross-default to other debt [commercially sensitive information redacted];

 

•     Cross-default to any other material agreements [commercially sensitive information redacted];

 

•     Judgments above a threshold of [commercially sensitive information redacted];

 

•     Bankruptcy and insolvency events;

 

•     Seizures of assets [commercially sensitive information redacted];

 

•     Liquidation or winding-up of the Borrower;

 

•     (a) repudiation by the Borrower of Definitive Documentation or Security or (b) illegality or invalidity of Definitive Documentation or Security; provided that, in the case of (b), where such situation is capable of remediation by the Borrower, then an event of default shall occur only where the Borrower fails to remediate the event or circumstance giving rise to such default to the satisfaction of the Agent within 20 days of becoming aware of such circumstance; and

 

•     [commercially sensitive information redacted].

 

For greater certainty, each of the financial measures above shall be without [commercially sensitive information redacted].

 

5

 

 

Covenants

The Definitive Documentation shall include standard negative and affirmative covenants for this type of financing (subject to certain customary and reasonable materiality thresholds, grace periods and exceptions) that will apply prior to all outstanding amounts under the Loan being repaid in full. Such covenants shall include, but are not limited to:

 

•     Restrictions on debt incurrence [commercially sensitive information redacted], except (i) as permitted above under Permitted Encumbrances, (ii) in respect of the Newmont loan not to exceed 220,000,000 Mexican Pesos, and (iii) foreign exchange related hedging indebtedness subject to agreed notional amount(s) and tenor(s) to be agreed in the Definitive Documentation, including intercreditor agreements, subject to the approval of Majority Lenders acting reasonably; provided that, save and except for (x) royalties in existence as of the date hereof, (y) royalties required by a governmental authority in Mexico in connection with Camino Rojo and (z) [commercially sensitive information redacted] no stream, royalty or like interest may be granted on Camino Rojo without the consent of Lenders with commitments comprising 75% of the total commitment at the applicable time (the “Majority Lenders”);

 

•     Restrictions on encumbrances except Permitted Encumbrances;

 

•     Restrictions on affiliate transactions and non-arms length transactions;

 

•     Restrictions on transfers of undertakings, property or assets subject to customary carve-outs for ordinary course dispositions of inventory, obsolete and worn assets (with customary reinvestment rights in equivalent assets within 180 days) and the disposition of Cerro Quema (if on an arm’s length basis and provided that (i) the Lenders are provided with ten (10) business days prior written notice of the Borrower launching any sales process for Cerro Quema; and (ii) the net cash proceeds from the sale of Cerro Quema shall be applied as a prepayment of the Loan);

 

•     Restrictions on investments using proceeds of the Additional Capital;

 

•     Restrictions on (i) mergers or amalgamations, except between the Borrower and its Restricted Subsidiaries, or between Restricted Subsidiaries, provided that the Agent is satisfied, acting reasonably, in each case that the Borrower and each other successor entity, as applicable, remains liable under all applicable Definitive Documentation in accordance with all applicable laws, and that all Security remains binding and perfected first priority security under all applicable laws (subject to Permitted Encumbrances), and (ii) dispositions of all or substantially all assets and similar transactions;

 

•     Payment of principal and interest accrued on the Loan;

 

•     The proceeds of the Additional Capital will not be comingled with any of the assets or property of any subsidiary of the Borrower that is not a Restricted Subsidiary;

 

•     Notice of (i) material adverse change, (ii) material litigation, (iii) threatened or pending material environmental investigations or claims, (iv)  proceedings or actions related to permits, and (v) defaults and events of default under the Definitive Documentation;

 

6

 

  

 

•     Maintenance of corporate existence;

 

•     Maintenance of books and records;

 

•     Maintenance by Borrower and its Restricted Subsidiaries (on an unconsolidated basis) of an aggregate minimum net working capital of US$5,000,000 and no other ongoing maintenance covenants;

 

•     Maintenance of insurance in such types and amounts as are customary in the case of persons engaged in the same or similar businesses and similarly situated;

 

•     Payment of taxes;

 

•     Inspection rights;

 

•     Compliance with laws, including material compliance with environmental laws, and compliance with AML, anti-corruption and sanctions;

 

•     Copies of monthly financial reports prepared for the Orla management and Board during construction of Camino Rojo and quarterly and annual financial reporting thereafter;

 

•     Dividends, share buy-backs, loans or any other distributions by the Borrower or any of the Restricted Subsidiaries shall be restricted at all times, unless consent has been received from the Majority Lenders; provided, however, unless a default or an event of default has occurred and is continuing: (i) the Borrower may, without the consent of the Majority Lenders, make capital contributions and loans to (A) Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV and (B) subsidiaries other than Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, provided that the capital contributions and loans made to subsidiaries other than Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV are not funded from Additional Capital, proceeds of the business or operations of, or the proceeds of the sale of the shares or assets of, any Restricted Subsidiary; provided further that, subject to (iii), proceeds of the business or operations of any Restricted Subsidiary are permitted to fund Cerro Quema; (ii) Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV may make dividends, loans, repayments or distributions to the Borrower without the consent of the Majority Lenders where all of the proceeds of such dividends, loans, repayments or distributions are used to pay/repay the principal and/or interest of the Loan; and (iii)  Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV may make dividends, loans, repayments or distributions to any Restricted Subsidiary or the Borrower for use by any Restricted Subsidiary or the Borrower for general corporate purposes without the consent of the Majority Lenders, provided that in the case of this clause (iii), 50% of the proceeds of such dividend, loan, repayment or distribution are used by such Restricted Subsidiary or the Borrower for general corporate purposes (which general corporate purpose shall not include (x) dividends, loans, share buy-backs, repayments and other distributions and (y) the construction, development or operation of, or investment in, or funding of debt service related to, any mine, property or business that will not be subject to the security set out under “Security”) and the remaining 50% of such proceeds are used to prepay the Loan; 

 

7

 

 

 

•     Restrictions on changes to the constating documents of the Borrower with respect to the creation of new classes of shares or equity rights;  

 

•     No material change in business;  

 

•     Restrictions providing financial assistance; and  

 

•     The Borrower shall, or shall cause, each direct or indirect subsidiary that becomes a Restricted Subsidiary from and after the date hereof to provide the Lenders with a guarantee and security over all of its assets (other than mortgage/real property security over assets that are not related to Camino Rojo as set out under “Security” above).

Commitment Fee The Borrower will pay, to the Arranging Lender, an aggregate commitment fee of 1.0% of the total Loan amount committed herein upon the earlier of Closing and drawdown of the First Tranche.  The Commitment Fee shall be payable by the Arranging Lender to each Lender on a pro rata basis based on such Lender’s loan commitments.
Expenses The Borrower shall be responsible for any and all reasonable and documented legal fees and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Arranging Lender in connection with its due diligence review and the negotiation and preparation of the Term Sheet and all related loan and security documentation.
Information Rights The Borrower shall provide the Lender with such financial or other information as may be reasonably requested by the Lender from time to time, provided that if any such requested information constitutes material non-public information, the Lender shall be required to execute a non-disclosure agreement prior to receipt of such information.
Conditions Precedent to Closing Customary conditions precedent for a financing of this type, including, without limitation:
 

(a) the following conditions precedent shall be satisfied upon the earlier of drawdown of the First Tranche and Closing:

 

•     compliance by the Borrower with all applicable regulatory, TSX, governmental and corporate requirements to the satisfaction of the Majority Lenders, including delivery of any required consents or approvals in respect of drawdown of the First Tranche and Closing, separately as applicable;

 

•     completion of lien and corporate searches and obtaining necessary discharges/estoppels of existing liens in respect of security applicable to drawdown of the First Tranche;

 

8

 

 

•     registration and perfection of security under the laws of the applicable jurisdictions (British Columbia and any other applicable Canadian jurisdiction required to perfect and protect the Lenders’ security) applicable to the drawdown of the First Tranche and Closing, as applicable (for greater certainty, excluding any requirement for perfection under the local laws of any non-Canadian jurisdiction) and a notation shall have been made on the shareholder register of each applicable subsidiary, including Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, noting the pledge and granting of security to the Lenders over all of the securities of such subsidiaries;

 

•     between the date of this Term Sheet and the Closing Date, no material adverse change in the assets, properties, operations, business, liabilities (actual or contingent), condition (financial or otherwise) of the Borrower or commodity prices, the economy or financial markets that disproportionately affect the Borrower;

 

•     satisfactory completion of “know your client” and anti-money laundering diligence;

 

•     no default or event of default shall reasonably be expected to occur at the time of drawdown of the First Tranche;

 

•     delivery of executed documentation evidencing the applicable security documentation set out under “Security” as conditions for drawing of the First Tranche;

 

•     delivery of physical share certificates representing all of the shares of Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, Minera Cerro Quema S.A. and each of the Restricted Subsidiaries, each duly endorsed in blank;

 

•     delivery of an executed copy of a promissory note to each of the First Tranche Lenders; and

 

•     delivery of an executed officer’s certificate, attaching authorizing resolutions, articles, by-laws and incumbency certification from the Borrower and each subsidiary providing Security for the First Tranche, in form and substance satisfactory to the Majority Lenders, acting reasonably.

 

(b)   to the extent not already completed, the following conditions precedent shall be satisfied at Closing

 

•     execution of the Definitive Documentation, corporate resolutions, legal opinions addressed to all Lenders, and closing certificates acceptable to the Lender and the Borrower;

 

•     completion of business, legal and financial due diligence satisfactory to the Lender;

 

•     completion of lien and corporate searches and obtaining necessary discharges/estoppels of existing liens;

 

9

 

 

 

•     evidence of insurance naming the Agent, on behalf of the Lenders, as additional insured and first loss payee in respect of all collateral;

 

•     between the date of this Term Sheet and the Closing Date, no material adverse change in the assets, properties, operations, business, liabilities (actual or contingent), condition (financial or otherwise) of the Borrower or commodity prices, the economy or financial markets that disproportionately affect the Borrower;

 

•     no continuing default or event of default; and 

 

•     payment of the Arranging Lender’s fees (including the Commitment Fee on behalf of all Lenders) and reasonable and documented expenses, including reasonable and documented legal fees and expenses. 

Conditions Precedent to Draws

Customary conditions precedent for draw of the Second Tranche and Third Tranche, including, without limitation:

 

•     repetition of representations and warranties (including, without limitation, representation that no event or circumstance has occurred that would have a material adverse effect on the assets, properties, operations, business, liabilities (actual or contingent) of the Borrower and its subsidiaries taken as a whole or commodity prices, the economy or financial markets that disproportionately affect the Borrower);

 

•     no continuing default or event of default; and

 

•     Borrower and its Restricted Subsidiaries having obtained all permits necessary for the commencement of the construction and development of Camino Rojo and the Agent is satisfied (acting reasonably) that the Borrower will obtain all necessary permits for the continued construction, development and operation of Camino Rojo; provided that this condition shall not apply to the First Tranche.

Taxes Customary tax gross-up provisions will apply in case of any withholding taxes applicable to any payments to each Lender under the terms and conditions of the Loan.
Debt Service Reserve Accounts None.
Cash sweeps/Mandatory Prepayment None, save and except for the mandatory prepayment in connection with dividend/distribution by the Borrower and a Change of Control (see above).
Political Risk Insurance Not required.

 

10

 

 

Cost overrun funding Not required.
Completion Test None.
Assignability The Borrower shall not have the right to assign the Loan or any portion thereof.  The Arranging Lender may, subject to applicable law, (i) syndicate the Loan in consultation with the Borrower (both prior to and after Closing) and (ii) following the initial syndication of the Loan, any Lender may assign all or any portion of the Loan (x) without consent of the Borrower, to any affiliate of such Lender or any fund managed by such Lender or (y) to any other person, with the consent of the Borrower, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, provided that after the occurrence of an Event of Default that is continuing, no such consent of the Borrower shall be required. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Arranging Lender shall not be permitted to syndicate the loan if such syndication would require regulatory or shareholder approval under applicable securities laws or the requirements of the Toronto Stock Exchange. In such event, the Lenders shall not be required to advance any portion of the Loan other than the First Tranche.
Information Dissemination The Arranging Lender, and any Lender named therein, shall have the right to approve any press releases or presentations in relation to the Loan.
Confidentiality Without prejudice to any non-disclosure or confidentiality agreement between the Borrower and any Lender, the Borrower agrees to keep confidential and not to disclose to any person or entity the contents of this Term Sheet and/or the fact that discussions or negotiations are taking place or have taken place between the Borrower and the Lenders in connection with the proposed transactions described herein.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Borrower may issue a press release in respect hereof; provided that if such press release names any Lender, such Lender shall have the right to approve such press release.
Governing Law (Definitive Documentation) The Definitive Documentation will be governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein.
Governing Law and Binding Effect

This Term Sheet shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein.

 

It is understood that this Term Sheet does not contain all matters upon which agreement must be reached in order for the proposed transaction to be consummated and that Definitive Documentation will govern the Loan.

 

11

 

Exhibit 99.54 

 

FORM 62-103F1

 

REQUIRED DISCLOSURE UNDER THE EARLY WARNING REQUIREMENTS

 

State if the report is filed to amend information disclosed in an earlier report. Indicate the date of the report that is being amended.

 

This early warning report is being filed to update information disclosed in an early warning report filed by Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”) dated February 15, 2018.

 

Item 1 – Security and Reporting Issuer

 

1.1 State the designation of securities to which this report relates and the name and address of the head office of the issuer of the securities.

 

This report relates to the common shares (the “Common Shares”) of: Orla Mining Ltd. (“Orla”)

 

Orla Mining Ltd. (“Orla”)
595 Howe Street, Suite 202
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 2T5.

 

1.2 State the name of the market in which the transaction or other occurrence that triggered the requirement to file this report took place.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 2 – Identity of the Acquiror

 

2.1 State the name and address of the acquiror.

 

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
145 King Street East, Suite 400
Toronto, Ontario M5C 2Y7

 

Agnico Eagle is a senior gold mining company organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario.

 

2.2 State the date of the transaction or other occurrence that triggered the requirement to file this report and briefly describe the transaction or other occurrence.

 

On October 18, 2019 Agnico and Orla entered into an investor rights agreement (the “Investor Rights Agreement”). See Item 6 below.

 

2.3 State the names of any joint actors.

 

Not applicable.

 

- 2 -

 

Item 3 – Interest in Securities of the Reporting Issuer

 

3.1          State the designation and number or principal amount of securities acquired or disposed of that triggered the requirement to file the report and the change in the acquiror’s security holding percentage in the class of securities.

 

Not applicable.

 

3.2          State whether the acquiror acquired or disposed ownership of, or acquired or ceased to have control over, the securities that triggered the requirement to file the report.

 

Not applicable.

 

3.3 If the transaction involved a securities lending arrangement, state that fact.

 

Not applicable.

 

3.4         State the designation and number or principal amount of securities and the acquiror’s securityholding percentage in the class of securities, immediately before and after the transaction or other occurrence that triggered the requirement to file this report.

 

Immediately before and after the occurrence that triggered the requirement to file this report, Agnico Eagle owned 17,613,835 Common Shares and 870,250 common share purchase warrants of Orla (a “Warrant”) entitling holders thereof to acquire one Common Share at a price of C$2.35 at any time prior to February 15, 2021, representing approximately 9.47% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares on a non-diluted basis and approximately 9.89% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares on a partially-diluted basis assuming exercise of the Warrants held by Agnico Eagle.

 

3.5         State the designation and number or principal amount of securities and the acquiror’s securityholding percentage in the class of securities referred to in Item 3.4 over which

 

(a) the acquiror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has ownership and control,

 

See Item 3.4 above.

 

(b) the acquiror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has ownership but control is held by persons or companies other than the acquiror or any joint actor, and

 

Not applicable.

 

(c) the acquiror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has exclusive or shared control but does not have ownership.

 

Not applicable.

 

- 3 -

 

3.6          If the acquiror or any of its joint actors has an interest in, or right or obligation associated with, a related financial instrument involving a security of the class of securities in respect of which disclosure is required under this item, describe the material terms of the related financial instrument and its impact on the acquiror’s securityholdings.

 

Not applicable.

 

3.7         If the acquiror or any of its joint actors is a party to a securities lending arrangement involving a security of the class of securities in respect of which disclosure is required under this item, describe the material terms of the arrangement including the duration of the arrangement, the number or principal amount of securities involved and any right to recall the securities or identical securities that have been transferred or lent under the arrangement.

 

Not applicable.

 

State if the securities lending arrangement is subject to the exception provided in section 5.7 of NI 62-104.

 

Not applicable.

 

3.8         If the acquiror or any of its joint actors is a party to an agreement, arrangement or understanding that has the effect of altering, directly or indirectly, the acquiror’s economic exposure to the security of the class of securities to which this report relates, describe the material terms of the agreement, arrangement or understanding.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 4 – Consideration Paid

 

4.1         State the value, in Canadian dollars, of any consideration paid or received per security and in total.

 

Not applicable.

 

4.2         In the case of a transaction or other occurrence that did not take place on a stock exchange or other market that represents a published market for the securities, including an issuance from treasury, disclose the nature and value, in Canadian dollars, of the consideration paid or received by the acquiror.

 

Not applicable.

 

4.3         If the securities were acquired or disposed of other than by purchase or sale, describe the method of acquisition or disposition.

 

Not applicable.

 

- 4 -

 

Item 5 – Purpose of the Transaction

 

State the purpose or purposes of the acquiror and any joint actors for the acquisition or disposition of securities of the reporting issuer. Describe any plans or future intentions which the acquiror and any joint actors may have which relate to or would result in any of the following:

 

(a) the acquisition of additional securities of the reporting issuer, or the disposition of securities of the reporting issuer;

 

(b) a corporate transaction, such as a merger, reorganization or liquidation, involving the reporting issuer or any of its subsidiaries;

 

(c) a sale or transfer of a material amount of the assets of the reporting issuer or any of its subsidiaries;

 

(d)          a change in the board of directors or management of the reporting issuer, including any plans or intentions to change the number or term of directors or to fill any existing vacancy on the board;

 

(e) a material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of the reporting issuer;

 

(f) a material change in the reporting issuer’s business or corporate structure;

 

(g)          a change in the reporting issuer’s charter, bylaws or similar instruments or another action which might impede the acquisition of control of the reporting issuer by any person or company;

 

(h)          a class of securities of the reporting issuer being delisted from, or ceasing to be authorized to be quoted on, a marketplace;

 

(i) the issuer ceasing to be a reporting issuer in any jurisdiction of Canada;

 

(j) a solicitation of proxies from securityholders;

 

(k) an action similar to any of those enumerated above.

 

Agnico Eagle acquired the Common Shares and the Warrants for investment purposes. Agnico Eagle may, from time to time, acquire additional Common Shares, common share purchase warrants or other securities of Orla or dispose of some or all of the Common Shares, common share purchase warrants or other securities of Orla that it owns at such time. Other than agreeing, subject to certain conditions, to participate as a member of a syndicate that will provide a secured project finance facility to Orla, Agnico Eagle currently has no other plans or intentions that relate to or would result in any of the actions listed in items (a) to (k) above, but depending on market conditions, general economic and industry conditions, trading prices of Orla’s securities, Orla’s business, financial condition and prospects and/or other relevant factors, Agnico Eagle may develop such plans or intentions in the future.

 

Item 6 – Agreements, Arrangements, Commitments or Understandings With Respect to Securities of the Reporting Issuer

 

Describe the material terms of any agreements, arrangements, commitments or understandings between the acquiror and a joint actor and among those persons and any person with respect to securities of the class of securities to which this report relates, including but not limited to the transfer or the voting of any of the securities, finder’s fees, joint ventures, loan or option arrangements, guarantees of profits, division of profits or loss, or the giving or withholding of proxies. Include such information for any of the securities that are pledged or otherwise subject to a contingency, the occurrence of which would give another person voting power or investment power over such securities, except that disclosure of standard default and similar provisions contained in loan agreements need not be included.

 

- 5 -

 

Agnico Eagle and Orla entered into the Investor Rights Agreement on October 18, 2019 (the “Investor Rights Agreement”) pursuant to which, among other things, the previously disclosed participation right agreement dated January 26, 2019 between Agnico Eagle and Orla was terminated and Agnico Eagle was granted, subject to maintaining certain ownership thresholds, the following rights: (a) the right to participate in certain equity financings and other equity issuances by Orla in order to acquire or maintain, as applicable, up to a 15% ownership interest in Orla (with such amount being subject to reduction in accordance with the Investor Rights Agreement); and (b) the right (which it has no present intention to exercise) to nominate one person to the board of directors of Orla. In addition, the Investor Rights Agreement: (i) provides Orla with the right, subject to certain conditions and exceptions, to designate a purchaser in the event Agnico Eagle, upon notice to the Issuer, wishes to sell more than 5% of the Common Shares in a single transaction (or series of related transactions); and (ii) subject to certain exceptions, requires Agnico Eagle, for a period of 18 months from the date of the Investor Rights Agreement, to vote its Common Shares in accordance with the recommendations of Orla’s management or board of directors.

 

Item 7 – Change in material fact

 

If applicable, describe any change in a material fact set out in a previous report filed by the acquiror under the early warning requirements or Part 4 in respect of the reporting issuer’s securities.

 

See Item 6 above.

 

Item 8 – Exemption

 

If the acquiror relies on an exemption from requirements in securities legislation applicable to formal bids for the transaction, state the exemption being relied on and describe the facts supporting that reliance.

 

Not applicable.

 

- 6 -

 

Item 9 – Certification

 

I, as the acquiror, certify, or I, as the agent filing the report on behalf of an acquiror, certify to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, that the statements made in this report are true and complete in every respect.

 

Date: October 23, 2019

 

/s/ Christopher Vollmershausen  
Name: Christopher Vollmershausen  
Title:   Vice-President, Legal  

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.55

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

ORLA MINING EXECUTES COMMITMENT LETTER FOR UP TO US$125 MILLION PROJECT FINANCE FACILITY

 

VANCOUVER, BC – October 21, 2019 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce that the Company has entered into a Commitment Letter with Trinity Capital Partners Corporation (“Trinity Capital”) with respect to a secured project finance facility of up to US$125 million (“Facility”) for the development of the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project located in Zacatecas, Mexico. The Facility is being arranged by Trinity Capital and will include a syndicate of lenders led by Pierre Lassonde, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”) and Trinity Capital, creating key alignment between debt and equity holders that will support the Company’s development going forward.

 

“Following a comprehensive selection process, led by our Chief Financial Officer Etienne Morin, and supported by our independent advisors Cutfield Freeman & Co., some of our key shareholders have re-iterated their support by agreeing to provide Orla with a simple and flexible debt facility, the proceeds of which will be used for the development of our first mine. We appreciate the interest of other debt providers, ranging from conventional banks to streaming companies and alternative debt funds, who were willing to support the Orla team and were eager to be part of our company’s growth”, stated Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer.

 

In connection with the Commitment Letter, Mr. Lassonde, Agnico Eagle and Trinity Capital have collectively committed to provide an initial tranche of an aggregate of US$25 million, which Orla may draw, at its option, prior to final syndication and completion of definitive documentation relating to the Facility and prior to final receipt of required mine permits. This initial advance will provide Orla with the flexibility to order long lead items and maintain an efficient construction schedule. The balance of the Facility will be available subject to the completion of definitive documentation, the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent and syndication (“Closing”), which is being arranged by Trinity Capital.

 

The Facility also provides key features sought by Orla through its solicitation process: a simple debt instrument with limited financial covenants, including a flexible structure allowing for early drawdown, pre-payment of principal and competitive pricing. Entering into this Commitment Letter demonstrates strong support from Orla’s current key shareholders. Trinity Capital’s in-depth knowledge of the Camino Rojo project is expected to result in an expedited timeline to Closing.

 

Key terms of the Facility will include:

 

· Term of 5.0 years.

 

· Up to US$125 million, with an early drawdown option:

 

US$25 million is committed and, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, will be available for drawdown prior to Closing at Orla’s option.

 

Two subsequent tranches of US$50 million each, available for drawdown upon Closing and after satisfaction of conditions precedent, including the receipt of key permits required for the development of Camino Rojo.

 

· Interest rate of 8.8% per annum.

 

1

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

· 32.5 million common share purchase warrants to be issued to the lenders on Closing, with an exercise price of C$3.00 per warrant, representing a 97% premium to the closing price of Orla on October 18, 2019, and a 7-year term.

 

· Principal repayment at maturity with no scheduled amortization: Orla can prepay the loan, in full or in part, at any time during the term, without penalty, with cash flow from operations.

 

· No mandatory hedging, production payments, offtake, streams or royalties are required.

 

The Facility will include standard and customary project finance terms and conditions with respect to fees and conditions precedent to Closing (including satisfaction of remaining customary due diligence and other approvals) and remains subject to the completion and execution of definitive loan documentation. The issuance of securities under the terms of the Facility is subject to regulatory approvals. Closing of the transaction is expected during the fourth quarter of 2019.

 

Cutfield Freeman & Co. provided independent advisory services to Orla in connection with the Facility with Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP acting as legal counsel.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 200,000 hectares. Estimated Mineral Reserves as of June 24, 2019 are 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne (“g/t”) and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. (Comprised of Proven Mineral Reserves of 14,595,000 tonnes at 0.79 g/t gold and 15.1 g/t silver and Probable Mineral Reserves of 29,424,000 tonnes at 0.70 g/t gold and 13.7 g/t silver). The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

On behalf of the Board of Directors

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

www.orlamining.com

info@orlamining.com

 

2

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

Multilateral Instrument 61-101

 

Mr. Lassonde has beneficial ownership of, control or direction over, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company and accordingly, the Facility and the issuance of the warrants insofar as they involve Mr. Lassonde constitute a related party transaction for the purposes of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (“MI 61-101”). The Company is not required to obtain a formal valuation for the Facility by virtue of section 5.4 of MI 61-101. In addition, the Company is relying on the exemption from the formal valuation and minority approval requirements of MI 61-101 set out in section 5.5(a) and section 5.7(a) of MI 61-101 as the fair market value of the Facility and the warrants insofar as it relates to interested parties is not more than 25% of market capitalization.

 

Forward-looking and Cautionary Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the Facility, including the proposed terms thereof, the timing for Closing of the Facility, the receipt of all required approvals for the Facility, commitment and syndication of the balance of the Facility, expected use of proceeds of the Facility, results of the feasibility study, including but not limited to the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plan and operations, internal rate of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present value, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; the timing and costs for production decisions; financing timelines and requirements, including the timing and the amount to be secured relating to the Facility; permitting timelines and requirements; requirements for additional land; exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources; upside opportunities including pit wall angles, land agreements, the development of the sulphide mineral resource and exploration potential; timing for start of engineering work, construction, and receipt of permits; timing for first gold production; and the Company's objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions regarding the ability to enter into a definitive agreement regarding the Facility; syndication of the Facility; price of gold and silver; the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; the loan amount to be received upon closing of the Facility; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: failing to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management; failing to enter into a definitive agreement with Trinity Capital or failing to receive commitments or syndicate the balance of the Facility; risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, including changes in the economic parameters; risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses, as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company’s most recently filed management’s discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 28, 2019, available on www.sedar.com. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

3

 

 

Exhibit 99.56

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

ORLA MINING AWARDS EPCM CONTRACT FOR CAMINO ROJO TO

M3 ENGINEERING

 

VANCOUVER, BC – September 9, 2019 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) ("Orla" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that the Company has awarded the engineering, procurement and construction management (“EPCM”) contract for the Camino Rojo oxide gold project located in Zacatecas State, Mexico to M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation (“M3”). M3 is a full service EPCM firm headquartered in Tucson, Arizona and has provided services to over 10,000 projects for some 1,000 clients in its 33-year history. Work on the Camino Rojo project will be undertaken out of the M3 office in Hermosillo, Mexico with senior review and support from the Tucson, Arizona office. M3 will be responsible for detailed engineering, construction planning and execution, contractor management and cost control for the project under the auspices of Orla management. Orla expects to begin engineering work by mid-September. The selection of M3 and commencement of any EPCM work is subject to entering into a definitive agreement with M3.

 

“M3 has a wealth of engineering knowledge and with its extensive experience in Mexico, it is well suited to design and build the Camino Rojo project on time and on budget”, stated Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Orla. “We look forward to commencing detailed engineering work by mid-September as we work with M3 to build a high-quality project that begins to produce gold in mid-2021.”

 

As detailed in the June 25, 2019 news release and subsequently filed technical report, the Camino Rojo oxide project is a robust project with low capital intensity, rapid payback and high margins consisting of an 18,000 tonne per day heap-leach open pit operation. An estimated 44.0 million tonnes grading 0.73 g/t Au and 14.2 g.t Ag is expected to be processed during a 6.8-year mine life. Gold production is expected to average 97,000 oz of gold per year at an estimated all-in sustaining cost of US$576 per ounce of gold.

 

Permitting

 

Orla has submitted the permit applications to SEMARNAT for the Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (“MIA”) and the Change of Land Use (“ETJ”) permits at the end of August. The legislated timelines for the review of properly prepared MIA and ETJ applications and mine operating permits for a project that does not affect federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves are 120 working days and 105 working days, respectively, which can be completed concurrently. 

 

Financing

 

Discussion are well underway with various lenders and financiers and Orla continues to progress according to schedule in developing the optimum structure to finance the development of the Camino Rojo oxide project.

 

1

 

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

Qualified Persons

 

Hans Smit, P.Geo. Chief Operating Officer of Orla, has reviewed and verified all technical and scientific information contained in this news release and is a Qualified Person within the meaning of NI 43-101.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 200,000 hectares. Estimated Mineral Reserves as of June 24, 2019 are 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne (“g/t”) and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. (Comprised of Proven Mineral Reserves of 14,595,000 tonnes at 0.79 g/t gold and 15.1 g/t silver and Probable Mineral Reserves of 29,424,000 tonnes at 0.70 g/t gold and 13.7 g/t silver). The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company's profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the "Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits" dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

On behalf of the Board of Directors

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

www.orlamining.com

info@orlamining.com

 

2

 

 

NEWS RELEASE  

 

Forward-looking and Cautionary Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the results of the Feasibility Study, including but not limited to the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plan and operations, internal rate of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present value, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; the timing and costs for production decisions; financing timelines and requirements; permitting timelines and requirements; requirements for additional land; exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources; upside opportunities including pit wall angles, land agreements, the development of the sulphide mineral resource and exploration potential; timing for start of engineering work, construction, and receipt of permits; timing for first gold production; and the Company's objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions regarding the ability to enter into a definitive agreement with M3; price of gold and silver; the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: failing to enter into a definitive agreement with M3; risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, including changes in the economic parameters; risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses, as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company’s most recently filed management’s discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 28, 2019, available on www.sedar.com. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

Non-IFRS Measures

 

The Company has included certain non-IFRS performance measures as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers and the non-IFRS measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.

 

All-In Sustaining Costs (“AISC”) – the Company has disclosed an AISC performance measure that reflects all of the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, the Company's definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. The Company believes that this measure will be useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the ability to generate free cash flow from current operations.

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.57

 

 

Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

 

Canadian dollars

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    June 30     December 31  
As at   2019     2018  
ASSETS                
Current assets                
Cash and equivalents   $ 5,031     $ 16,686  
Accounts receivable     87       385  
Prepaid expenses     73       206  
      5,191       17,277  
Restricted cash and reclamation deposits     594       205  
Value added taxes recoverable     1,218       849  
Property, plant, and equipment (note 6)     396       344  
Exploration and evaluation assets (note 5)     163,707       169,282  
TOTAL ASSETS   $ 171,106     $ 187,957  
                 
LIABILITIES                
Current liabilities                
Accounts payable (note 7)   $ 970     $ 1,743  
Lease obligation (note 8)     29        
Accrued liabilities     1,222       1,916  
      2,221       3,659  
Lease obligation (note 8)     74        
Newmont loan (note 9)     8,988       6,103  
Site closure provisions     722       745  
TOTAL LIABILITIES     12,005       10,507  
                 
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                
Share capital     201,875       201,077  
Reserves     27,719       25,960  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (gain)     (646 )     4,797  
Accumulated deficit     (69,847 )     (54,384 )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY     159,101       177,450  
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 171,106     $ 187,957  

 

Nature and continuance of operations (note 1)

Events after the reporting period (notes 9, 10(a))

 

Authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors on August 9, 2019.

 

/s/ David Stephens   /s/ Jason Simpson
David Stephens, Director   Jason Simpson, Director

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Loss

(Thousands of Canadian dollars, except per-share amounts)

 

    Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
 June 30
 
    2019     2018     2019     2018  
          restated note 4           restated note 4  
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENSES (note 5)                                
Assays and analysis   $ 48     $ 295     $ 159     $ 477  
Drilling     289       834       972       1,145  
Geological     554       1,172       1,297       2,289  
Engineering     833       144       1,742       201  
Environmental     231       60       423       91  
Community and government     222       211       467       523  
Land and water use, claims and concessions     18       241       3,085       2,058  
Project management     80       64       124       107  
Project review     12       55       118       76  
Site activities     404       750       1,181       1,553  
Site administration     824       636       1,450       1,218  
      3,515       4,462       11,018       9,738  
                                 
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES                                
Office and administrative     162       126       379       234  
Professional fees     148       202       273       338  
Regulatory and transfer agent     46       14       87       54  
Salaries and benefits     564       230       1,114       464  
      920       572       1,853       1,090  
                                 
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)                                
Depreciation     23       33       62       66  
Share based payments     907       1,523       2,160       2,319  
Interest income     (30 )     (182 )     (92 )     (203 )
Interest expense on lease obligations     1             1        
Foreign exchange loss (gain)     11       (138 )     24       (152 )
Change in fair value of Newmont loan (note 9)     76       157       433       157  
Other                 4       8  
      988       1,393       2,592       2,195  
                                 
LOSS FOR THE PERIOD   $ 5,423     $ 6,427     $ 15,463     $ 13,023  
                                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions)     179.5       178.9       179.5       174.3  
                                 
Loss per share - basic and diluted   $ 0.03     $ 0.04     $ 0.09     $ 0.07  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(Thousands of Canadian dollars, except per-share amounts)

 

    Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
    2019     2018     2019     2018  
          restated note 4           restated note 4  
LOSS FOR THE PERIOD   $ 5,423     $ 6,427     $ 15,463     $ 13,023  
                                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME)                                
Items that may in future periods be reclassified to profit or loss                                
Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations     2,932       1,941       5,443       (4,123 )
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS   $ 8,355     $ 8,368     $ 20,906     $ 8,900  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
Cash flows provided by (used in):   2019     2018     2019     2018  
          restated note 4           restated note 4  
OPERATING ACTIVITIES                                
Net income (loss) for the period   $ (5,423 )   $ (6,427 )   $ (15,463 )   $ (13,023 )
Adjustments for items not affecting cash:                                
Depreciation     23       33       62       66  
Share based compensation     907       1,523       2,160       2,319  
Loan proceeds received in excess of fair value credited to exploration expense (note 9)                 (950 )      
Change in fair value of Newmont loan     76       95       433       157  
Exploration expenses paid via issuance of common shares     65             65        
Changes in non-cash working capital:                                
Accounts receivable     137       105       289       90  
Prepaid expenses     91       (44 )     132       140  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     (403 )     (557 )     (1,450 )     (12 )
Cash used in operating activities     (4,527 )     (5,272 )     (14,722 )     (10,263 )
                                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES                                
Proceeds on issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs     349       136       349       29,171  
Advances received on the Newmont loan (note 9)                 3,556       3,917  
Share issuance costs     (17 )           (17 )      
Cash payments against lease obligations     (13 )           (13 )      
Cash provided by financing activities     319       136       3,875       33,088  
                                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES                                
Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets                       (1,819 )
Purchase of equipment     (6 )     (45 )     (6 )     (65 )
Restricted cash and reclamation deposits funded     (76 )           (404 )      
Value added taxes paid, not immediately recoverable     (185 )     (206 )     (391 )     (270 )
Cash used in investing activities     (267 )     (251 )     (801 )     (2,154 )
                                 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash     (150 )     (86 )     (7 )     117  
                                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents     (4,625 )     (5,473 )     (11,655 )     20,788  
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period     9,656       32,403       16,686       6,142  
Cash and equivalents, end of period   $ 5,031     $ 26,930     $ 5,031     $ 26,930  
                                 
Cash and equivalents consist of:                                
Bank current accounts and cash on hand                   $ 5,031     $ 26,907  
Short term highly liquid investments                           23  
                    $ 5,031     $ 26,930  

 

Supplemental cash flow information (note 12)

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    Common shares     Reserves                    
    Number of
shares
(thousands)
    Amount     Warrants     Options     RSUs, DSUs,
and Bonus
shares
    Total     Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income
    Retained
earnings
    Total  
Balances at January 1, 2018, as previously stated     160,441     $ 174,436     $ 14,114     $ 4,944     $ 118     $ 19,176     $ (8,840 )   $ (14,984 )   $ 169,788  
Effect of change in accounting policy                                         183       (9,487 )     (9,304 )
Balances at January 1, 2018, restated     160,441       174,436     $ 14,114     $ 4,944     $ 118     $ 19,176     $ (8,657 )   $ (24,471 )   $ 160,484  
Private placement     17,581       27,803       2,964                   2,964                   30,767  
Shares issued for debt settlement     148       207                                           207  
Share issuance costs           (1,777 )                                         (1,777 )
Warrants exercised     388       64       (18 )                 (18 )                 46  
Stock options exercised     657       333             (197 )           (197 )                 136  
Share based payments                       1,987       336       2,323                   2,323  
Loss for the period                                               (13,023 )     (13,023 )
Other comprehensive income                                         4,123             4,123  
Balance at June 30, 2018     179,215     $ 201,066     $ 17,060     $ 6,734     $ 454     $ 24,248     $ (4,534 )   $ (27,494 )   $ 183,286  
                                                                         
Balance at January 1, 2019     179,315     $ 201,077     $ 17,026     $ 8,020     $ 914     $ 25,960     $ 4,797     $ (54,384 )   $ 177,450  
Shares issued for Monitor agreement     59       65                                           65  
Exercise of warrants     563       535       (186 )                 (186 )                 349  
Share issuance costs           (17 )                                         (17 )
Redemptions of RSUs     196       215                   (215 )     (215 )                  
Share based payments                       1,344       816       2,160                   2,160  
Loss for the year                                               (15,463 )     (15,463 )
Other comprehensive loss                                         (5,443 )           (5,443 )
Balance at June 30, 2019     180,133     $ 201,875     $ 16,840     $ 9,364     $ 1,515     $ 27,719     $ (646 )   $ (69,847 )   $ 159,101  

 

For details of the change in accounting policy during 2018, refer to note 3 of the audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 6

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION AND CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS

 

Orla Mining Ltd. was incorporated in Alberta in 2007 and has been continued as a federal company under the Canada Business Corporations Act since 2016. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. The registered office of the Company is located at Suite 202, 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada.

 

The Company is engaged in the exploration, development, and acquisition of mineral properties, and holds two material gold projects – the Camino Rojo oxide gold and silver project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama.

 

These unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. Different bases of measurement may be appropriate if the Company is not expected to continue operations for the foreseeable future. As at June 30, 2019, the Company had not advanced any of its properties to commercial production and was not able to fund day-to-day activities through operations. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon successful results from our mineral exploration activities and our ability to attain profitable operations and generate cash or raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations. We expect to fund operating costs of the Company over the next twelve months with cash on hand and with further equity or debt financings.

 

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION

 

We have prepared these condensed interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with IAS 34 «Interim Financial Reporting». They do not include all the information required for full annual financial statements.

 

The Board of Directors approved these condensed interim consolidated financial statements for issue, on August 9, 2019.

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

These condensed interim consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

We applied the same accounting policies in these condensed interim consolidated financial statements as those applied in the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

In preparing these condensed interim consolidated financial statements, the significant judgements we made in applying the Company’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those that applied to the annual consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

You should read these condensed interim consolidated financial statements in conjunction with the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

4. CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES DURING THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 WHICH EFFECT THE COMPARATIVE FIGURES

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we changed certain of our accounting policies. Consequently, we restated the figures presented for the comparative period (namely, the three and six months ended June 30, 2018). A discussion of the quantitative changes respecting the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 are presented in this note below. For a qualitative discussion of these changes in accounting policies we refer you to note 3(a) of our annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

(i) Exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) expenditures

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to capitalize exploration and evaluation expenditures. In preparation for the possible construction and operation of our mineral projects, we updated our policy with respect to such expenditures. The new policy is to expense such expenditures as incurred.

 

(ii) Site-related administrative costs

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to include site-related administrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel within “general and administrative expenses”. The new policy is to present these costs within exploration expenditures.

 

(iii) Site-related VAT recoverable amounts

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to include site-related value-added taxes (“VAT”) recoverable, such as Mexican IVA, within “exploration and evaluation assets”. The new policy is to present these amounts as receivables, with appropriate current and long term classification. The IVA paid upon the initial acquisition of the Camino Rojo Project continues to be carried as part of acquisition costs.

 

(iv) Corporate administrative costs

 

As a result of the reclassifications in note (ii) above, corporate “rent”, “public and community relations”, and “travel” were not material. Consequently, we grouped them within “office and administrative” expenses.

 

(v) Effects of these changes in accounting policies

 

The effects of the above changes on the results of operations and cash flows are presented here:

 

    Three months ended
June 30, 2018
    Six months ended
June 30, 2018
 
Effect on income statement of changes in accounting policies                
Exploration and evaluation expenses (“E&E”):                
As originally presented   $ 40     $ 46  
E&E charged to expenses, note (i)     4,422       9,692  
As restated   $ 4,462     $ 9,738  

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

    Three months ended
June 30, 2018
    Six months ended
June 30, 2018
 
Office and administration expenses:                
As originally presented   $ 265     $ 432  
Site-related adminstrative costs reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (210 )     (324 )
Corporate public and community relations reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     6       30  
Corporate rent reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     18       27  
Corporate travel reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     47       69  
As restated   $ 126     $ 234  
                 
Professional fees:                
As originally presented   $ 286     $ 489  
Site-related professional fees reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (84 )     (151 )
As restated   $ 202     $ 338  
                 
Public and community relations:                
As originally presented   $ 84     $ 209  
Site-related public and community relations costs reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (78 )     (179 )
Corporate public and community relations reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (6 )     (30 )
As restated   $     $  
                 
Rent:                
As originally presented   $ 33     $ 57  
Site-related rent reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (15 )     (30 )
Corporate rent reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (18 )     (27 )
As restated   $     $  
                 
Salaries and benefits:                
Originally presented as management and directors’ fees   $ 225     $ 444  
Originally presented as salaries and benefits     97       278  
As originally presented, combined     322       722  
Site-related salaries and benefits reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (92 )     (258 )
As restated   $ 230     $ 464  
                 
Travel:                
As originally presented   $ 88     $ 149  
Site-related travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (41 )     (80 )
Corporate travel reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (47 )     (69 )
As restated   $     $  

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

    Three months ended
June 30, 2018
    Six months ended
June 30, 2018
 
Effect on cash flow statement of changes in accounting policies                
                 
Cash used in operating activities:                
As originally presented   $ (1,367 )   $ (1,592 )
Site-related adminstrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     519       1,021  
E&E charged to expenses, note (i)     (4,457 )     (9,755 )
Depreciation included in E&E     33       63  
As restated   $ (5,272 )   $ (10,263 )
                 
Cash used in investing activities:                
As originally presented   $ (4,155 )   $ (10,825 )
Site-related adminstrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (519 )     (1,021 )
E&E (excluding depreciation) charged to expenses, note (i)     4,423       9,692  
As restated   $ (251 )   $ (2,154 )

 

There were no changes in cash flows provided by financing activities.    

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

5. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION

 

The Company’s exploration and evaluation projects consist of the Camino Rojo Project, the Cerro Quema Project, and the Monitor Gold Project.

 

(a) Camino Rojo Project

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Goldcorp Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine and consists of eight concessions covering in aggregate 205,936 hectares. As currently understood, Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with exploration potential.

 

In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc. (a predecessor company to Newmont) by:

 

· issuing 31,860,141 common shares of Orla,
· granting a 2% net smelter royalty (the “Royalty”) on the sale of all metal production from Camino Rojo, and
· paying certain obligations, including Mexican value-added taxes, of approximately $4,923,000.

 

In addition, the Company and Goldcorp (now, Newmont) entered into an option agreement regarding the potential development of sulphide operations at Camino Rojo. Pursuant to the option agreement, Newmont will, subject to the applicable sulphide project meeting certain thresholds, have an option to acquire a 60% or 70% interest in the applicable sulphide project. The Royalty excludes revenue on the sale of metals produced from a sulphide project where Newmont has exercised its Sulphide Option.

 

We maintain a right of first refusal if Newmont elects to sell the Royalty, in whole or in part.

 

(b) Cerro Quema Project

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open-pit mine with process by heap leaching.

 

In December 2016, we acquired 100% of the Cerro Quema Project by acquiring Pershimco Resources Inc. through the issuance of a combination of Orla common shares and warrants, and the assumption of Pershimco’s long term debt, which we subsequently paid off. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the current mineral resource areas, proposed mine development areas, and priority drill target areas.

 

The original 20-year terms for these concessions expired in February and March of 2017. The Company has applied for the prescribed ten year extension to these concessions as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. In March 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications had been received and that exploration work could continue while the Company awaits renewal of the concessions. As of the date of these financial statements, final concession renewals have not been received. However, we continue to receive ongoing drilling, water use, environmental and other permits, and have paid concession taxes, in the normal course.

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(c) Monitor Gold Project

 

The Monitor Gold Project consists of three separate option agreements consisting of 422 claims covering 3,416 hectares in Nye County, Nevada, USA.

 

To maintain the options, minimum payments and work commitments are required for each year to 2038. In 2019, these consist of US$50,000 in share issuances (completed in January 2019), US$20,000 in advance royalty payments (completed in March 2019)), and US$30,000 in work commitments. For 2020, these payments and work commitments consist of US$40,000 in advance royalty payments, and US$75,000 in work commitments. We expense these property options payments and work commitments as they are incurred.

 

(d) Exploration and evaluation assets

 

Capitalized initial acquisition costs of our active mineral properties are as follows:

 

    Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Other     Total  
Acquisition costs at historical rates                                        
At December 31, 2018   $ 54,258     $ 109,474     $ 407     $     $ 164,139  
Additions                              
At June 30, 2019   $ 54,258     $ 109,474     $ 407     $     $ 164,139  
                                         
Accumulated foreign exchange on translation                                        
At December 31, 2018   $ 2,145     $ 2,976     $ 22     $       —     $ 5,143  
Due to changes in exchange rates     (982 )     (4,575 )     (18 )           (5,575 )
At June 30, 2019   $ 1,163     $ (1,599 )   $ 4     $     $ (432 )
                                         
Acquisition costs                                        
At December 31, 2018   $ 56,403     $ 112,450     $ 429     $     $ 169,282  
At June 30, 2019   $ 55,421     $ 107,875     $ 411     $     $ 163,707  

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(e) Exploration and evaluation expense

 

Three months ended June 30, 2019   Camino Rojo     Cerro Quema     Monitor Gold     Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 48     $     $     $     $ 48  
Drilling     289                         289  
Geological     304       220       30             554  
Engineering     833                         833  
Environmental     231                         231  
Community and government     160       62                   222  
Land, water use, and claims     17       1                   18  
Project management     80                         80  
Project review                       12       12  
Site activities     264       140                   404  
Site administration     193       629       2             824  
    $ 2,419     $ 1,052     $ 32     $ 12     $ 3,515  

 

Six months ended June 30, 2019   Camino Rojo     Cerro Quema     Monitor Gold     Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 128     $ 31     $     $     $ 159  
Drilling     972                         972  
Geological     673       589       35             1,297  
Engineering     1,742                         1,742  
Environmental     423                         423  
Community and government     278       189                   467  
Land, water use, and claims     2,980       3       102             3,085  
Project management     124                         124  
Project review                       118       118  
Site activities     573       608                   1,181  
Site administration     410       1,038       2             1,450  
    $ 8,303     $ 2,458     $ 139     $ 118     $ 11,018  

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Three months ended June 30, 2018 
(restated)
  Camino Rojo     Cerro Quema     Monitor Gold     Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 108     $ 187     $     $     $ 295  
Drilling     339       495                   834  
Geological     705       357       110             1,172  
Engineering     144                         144  
Environmental     60                         60  
Community and government     9       202                   211  
Land, water use, and claims     201             40             241  
Project management     64                         64  
Project review                       55       55  
Site activities     371       364       15             750  
Site administration     102       534                   636  
    $ 2,103     $ 2,139     $ 165     $ 55     $ 4,462  

 

Six months ended June 30, 2018 
(restated)
  Camino Rojo     Cerro Quema     Monitor Gold     Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 199     $ 278     $     $     $ 477  
Drilling     339       806                   1,145  
Geological and geophysical     915       1,240       134             2,289  
Engineering     201                         201  
Environmental     91                         91  
Community and government     45       478                   523  
Land, water use, and claims     2,018             40             2,058  
Project management     107                         107  
Project review                       76       76  
Site activities     702       836       15             1,553  
Site administration     161       1,057                   1,218  
    $ 4,778     $ 4,695     $ 189     $ 76     $ 9,738  

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

6. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT

 

    Right-of-use
assets: facilities
    Equipment     Office
equipment
    Computer
equipment
    Vehicles     Total  
Cost                                                
At December 31, 2018   $     $ 427     $ 44     $ 185     $ 29     $ 685  
Additions (disposals)     116       1       3       2             122  
Movements in exchange rates           (8 )     (2 )     (1 )     (1 )     (12 )
At June 30, 2019   $ 116     $ 420     $ 45     $ 186     $ 28     $ 795  
                                                 
Accumulated depreciation                                                
At December 31, 2018   $     $ 207     $ 17     $ 101     $ 16     $ 341  
Charged in the year     6       36       2       13       6       63  
Movements in exchange rates           (4 )                 (1 )     (5 )
At June 30, 2019   $ 6     $ 239     $ 19     $ 114     $ 21     $ 399  
                                                 
Net book value                                                
At December 31, 2018   $     $ 220     $ 27     $ 84     $ 13     $ 344  
At June 30, 2019   $ 110     $ 181     $ 26     $ 72     $ 7     $ 396  

 

7. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

 

    June 30,
2019
    December 31,
2018
 
Trade payables   $ 707     $ 1,341  
Payroll related liabilities     263       402  
    $ 970     $ 1,743  

 

8. LEASES

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, we entered into a lease of approximately three years in respect of office space. Prior to this agreement, our terms were month-to-month, for which we had elected to expense as incurred.

 

Upon inception of the lease, we recognized a right-of-use asset of $116,000 with an offsetting lease liability of the same amount.

 

The lease obligation was calculated using a discount rate of 10% based on fixed payments required under the lease. We deducted initial non-refundable payments totaling $10,000 paid at inception. We expense annual operating and tax payments as incurred and include them within office and administration.

 

We will depreciate the right-of-use asset on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

 

Page 15

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

    June 30,
2019
    December 31,
2018
 
Current portion   $ 29     $  
Long term portion     74        
    $ 103     $  

 

9. NEWMONT LOAN

 

    Mexican
pesos
 (thousands)
    Mexican
pesos
(thousands)
    Canadian
dollars
(thousands)
 
    Undiscounted     Discounted        
At December 31, 2018     121,865       87,917     $ 6,103  
Advances received     51,357       37,634       3,569  
Advances received in excess of fair value, credited to exploration expense                 (963 )
Change in fair value during the period           5,152       357  
Foreign exchange                 (45 )
At March 31, 2019     173,222       130,703       9,021  
Change in fair value during the period           1,063       76  
Foreign exchange                 (109 )
At June 30, 2019     173,222       131,766     $ 8,988  

 

Newmont (then, Goldcorp) agreed to provide interest-free loans to the Company for all the annual landholding costs on the Camino Rojo project from November 7, 2017 until December 31, 2019. The loans are to be repaid upon declaration of commencement of commercial production of a heap leach operation at the Camino Rojo Project.

 

At our option, we may repay any amounts owing to Newmont, prior to maturity, in the form of (a) a lump sum cash payment, (b) the issuance of additional common shares of the Company, or (c) a combination of cash and shares, all provided that any issuance of common shares does not result in Newmont holding more than 19.99% of the issued and outstanding number of common shares of the Company.

 

Because the loan is non-interest bearing, for accounting purposes at each reporting date we discount the expected payments using a risk-adjusted discount rate. At initial inception, a rate of 14.6% was used. At June 30, 2019, a discount rate of 14.1% was used. Amounts received in excess of fair value are credited to exploration expense upon receipt.

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, the Company received a further advance of MXN 46 million ($3.2 million) from Newmont pursuant to this agreement.

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

10. SHARE CAPITAL

 

(a) Warrants

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, we announced an Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program, the purpose of which was to encourage the early exercise of the Company’s warrants which are scheduled to expire on July 8, 2021 (the “July 2021 warrants”). Under the incentive program, holders of such warrants were entitled to receive one full new warrant (the "Incentive Warrant") if they exercised their July 2021 warrants prior to July 12, 2019. Each Incentive Warrant is exercisable into one common share of the Company at a price of $1.65 expiring June 12, 2022.

 

The following summarizes information about warrants outstanding at June 30, 2019:

 

Expiry date   Exercise price     Outstanding,
December 31,
2018
    Exercised     Issued     Outstanding,
June 30,
2019
 
February 15, 2021   $ 2.35       8,790,600                   8,790,600  
July 8, 2021   $ 0.62       6,737,500       (562,500 )           6,175,000  
June 12, 2022   $ 1.65                     562,500       562,500  
November 7, 2022   $ 1.40       3,000,000                   3,000,000  
Total number of warrants             18,528,100       (562,500 )     562,500       18,528,100  
Weighted average exercise price           $ 1.57     $ 0.62     $ 1.65     $ 1.60  

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, a further 5,230,000 warrants were exercised, for gross proceeds of $3,243,000. Consequently, 5,230,000 new warrants expiring on June 12, 2022 were issued.

 

(b) Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”)

 

RSUs outstanding:

 

          Number vesting or settling in the year  
      Number        2019       2020       2021       2022  
Outstanding, January 1, 2019     368,000       202,666       82,667       82,667        
Settled     (196,000 )     (196,000 )                  
Awarded     849,639             283,214       283,214       283,211  
Outstanding, June 30, 2019     1,021,639       6,666       365,881       365,881       283,211  

 

(c) Deferred Share Units (“DSUs”)

 

DSUs outstanding:      
       
    Number  
Outstanding, December 31, 2018     180,000  
Awarded     240,566  
Outstanding, June 30, 2019     420,566  

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(d) Bonus shares

 

(i) Non-executive Chairman bonus shares

 

During 2017, the Board of Directors awarded 500,000 common shares to the non-executive Chairman of the Company as bonus shares. The bonus shares are subject to a vesting period from June 19, 2017 to June 18, 2020 (the “Eligibility Period”). If the non-executive Chairman ceases to be the director of the Company before the Eligibility Period ends, the bonus shares will be forfeited. The bonus shares will become issuable (1) after the Eligibility Period on the date that the non-executive Chairman ceases to act as a director of the Company, or (2) upon a change of control of the Company.

 

We estimated the fair value of the bonus shares ($655,000) based on the market price of the common shares at the date of Board approval. Accordingly, we are recognizing this award date fair value in share based payments expense on a straight-line basis over the Eligibility Period.

 

(ii) Chief Executive Officer bonus shares

 

On November 13, 2018, the Board of Directors awarded 1,000,000 bonus shares to the incoming Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The bonus shares vest in four tranches of 250,000 bonus shares each, issuable upon the achievement of certain share price thresholds particular to each tranche. We estimated that these market condition tranches would vest in various periods from December 2019 to March 2022. Accordingly, we are recognizing the award date fair value ($537,000) in share payments expense over these periods.

 

11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company’s related parties include:

 

Related party   Nature of the relationship
Key management personnel (“KMP”)   Key management personnel are the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and members of the Board of Directors of the Company.
     
Quantum Advisory Partners LLP (“Quantum”)  

Registered limited liability partnership, of which Paul Robertson, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is an incorporated partner.

 

The Company did not employ Mr. Robertson directly, and he provided services as Chief Financial Officer pursuant to a professional services agreement with Quantum.

 

Besides providing the services of Mr. Robertson, Quantum provided bookkeeping and accounting services to the Company at agreed monthly quantities and rates, with additional charges for excess usage. Pricing is at normal commercial terms, with prices negotiated annually.

 

Quantum ceased to be a related party on April 30, 2018.

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amount 

 

(a) Key Management Personnel

 

Compensation to key management personnel was as follows:

 

    Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
    2019     2018     2019     2018  
Short term incentive plans                                
      Salaries, management fees, consulting fees   $ 613     $ 224     $ 844     $ 443  
      Directors’ fees     51             92        
      664       224       936       443  
Share based payments     690       1,121       1,699       1,736  
Total   $ 1,354     $ 1,345     $ 2,635     $ 2,179  

 

No amounts for estimated short term incentive compensation were accrued at March 31, 2019. At June 30, 2019, we revised our estimate and accrued $351,000 for such costs.

 

The Company has agreed to making severance payments amounting to approximately $3,300,000 (December 31, 2018 – $3,225,000) to certain officers and management in the event of a change in control. As the likelihood of these events taking place is not determinable, we have not reflected such amounts in these financial statements.

 

(b) Transactions

 

The following related party transactions are included in compensation to key management personnel, above.

 

    Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
    2019     2018     2019     2018  
Quantum – management services   $     $ 52     $     $ 71  

 

The Company had no other material transactions with related parties other than key management personnel during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

 

(c) Outstanding balances at the Reporting Date

 

No related party amounts were receivable or payable at June 30, 2019 (December 31, 2018 – $nil).

 

The amounts we have accrued in respect of short-term incentive compensation (note 11(a)) are not legally enforceable liabilities until the Board resolves these amounts to be paid.

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

12. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

The non-cash investing and financing activities of the Company include the following:

 

    Three months ended
June 30
    Six months ended
June 30
 
    2019     2018     2019     2018  
Shares issued for debt settlement   $     $     $     $ 207  
Reclassification from reserves to share capital upon exercise of options           197             197  
Reclassification from reserves to share capital upon exercise of warrants     186             186       18  
Reclassification from reserves to share capital upon maturity of RSUs     215             215        
Initial recognition of right of use asset with offsetting lease liability     106             106        
Reclassification between accounts receivable and restricted cash     329             329        

 

13. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

(a) Reportable segments

 

The operating segments of the Company are based on the reports which are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in making strategic resource allocation decisions. These operating segments are the Panamanian projects, the Mexican projects, and the corporate office. The projects are each managed by a dedicated General Manager and management team. Additionally, the corporate office oversees the plans and activities of early stage exploration projects, such as the Monitor Gold project.

 

None of these segments as yet generate revenue from external customers, and each of the projects are focused on the exploration and evaluation of mineral properties.

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Geographic segments

 

We conduct our activities in four geographic areas: Mexico, Panama, the United States, and Canada.

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At June 30, 2019                                        
   Restricted cash   $     $ 525     $     $ 69     $ 594  
   Property, plant, and equipment     182       70             144       396  
   Exploration and evaluation assets     55,421       107,875       411             163,707  
                                         
At December 31, 2018                                        
   Restricted cash   $     $ 205     $     $     $ 205  
   Property, plant, and equipment     193       117             34       344  
   Exploration and evaluation assets     56,403       112,450       429             169,282  

 

      Mexico       Panama       USA       Canada       Total  
Exploration expense                                        
   Three months ended March 31, 2019   $ 5,884     $ 1,406     $ 107     $ 106     $ 7,503  
   Three months ended June 30, 2019     2,419       1,052       32       12       3,515  
   Six months ended June 30, 2019   $ 8,303     $ 2,458     $ 139     $ 118     $ 11,018  
                                         
   Three months ended March 31, 2018   $ 2,675     $ 2,588     $ 24     $ 21     $ 5,308  
   Three months ended June 30, 2018     2,104       2,169       165       55       4,493  
   Six months ended June 30, 2018   $ 4,779     $ 4,757     $ 189     $ 76     $ 9,801  

 

14. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

 

Our objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the exploration and evaluation of our mineral properties and to maintain a flexible capital structure. In the management of capital, we include long term loans and share capital.

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, there were no changes to our policy for capital management during the year.

 

We manage our capital structure and make adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the Company’s capital structure, we may issue new shares, acquire or dispose of assets, or adjust the amount of cash and short-term investments. In order to maximize ongoing development efforts, we do not currently pay dividends. The Company and its subsidiaries are not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.

 

Loan advances from Newmont are used within a few weeks of receipt to pay land holding costs pursuant to the agreement governing these advances.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Our investment policy is to invest the Company’s excess cash in low risk financial instruments such as term deposits and higher yield savings accounts with major Canadian banks. By using this strategy, the Company preserves its cash resources and is able to marginally increase these resources through the yields on these investments. Our financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks, which include currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk.

 

Our ability to carry out our long range strategic objectives in future years depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing exploration and development activities.

 

15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

(a) Fair value hierarchy

 

To provide an indication of the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, we classify our financial instruments into the three levels prescribed by the accounting standards.

 

Level 1 The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded equity securities) is based on quoted (unadjusted) market prices as at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Company is the closing trading price on the reporting date. Such instruments are included in Level 1.

 

Level 2 The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, we include that instrument in Level 2.

 

Level 3 If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3. We have no financial assets or liabilities included in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

At June 30, 2019, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying
value
    Quoted
prices in
active market
for identical
assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                            
Cash   FVTPL   $ 5,031     $ 5,031     $     $           —     $ 5,031  
Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     37             37             37  
Restricted cash   FVTPL     69       69                   69  
Reclamation deposits   Amortized cost     525             525             525  
        $ 5,662       5,100     $ 562     $     $ 5,662  
                                             
Financial liabilities                                            
Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 707     $     $ 707     $     $ 707  
Lease obligations   Amortized cost     103             103             103  
Newmont loan   FVTPL     8,988             8,988             8,988  
        $ 9,798     $     $ 9,798     $     $ 9,798  

 

At December 31, 2018, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying
value
    Quoted
prices in
active market
for identical
assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                            
Cash   FVTPL   $ 16,686     $ 16,686     $     $       —     $ 16,686  
Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     385             385             385  
Reclamation deposits   Amortized cost     205             205             205  
        $ 17,276       16,686     $ 590     $     $ 17,276  
                                             
Financial liabilities                                            
Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 1,341     $     $ 1,341     $     $ 1,341  
Newmont loan   FVTPL     6,103             6,103             6,103  
        $ 7,444     $     $ 7,444     $     $ 7,444  

 

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Our policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the reporting period. As at June 30, 2019, we had no financial assets or financial liabilities which we measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

 

(b) Financial Risk Management

 

(i) Credit risk

 

Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to financial instruments fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company’s exposure to credit risk is limited to cash and reclamation deposits.

 

Our cash is held at large Canadian financial institutions in interest bearing accounts. Our reclamation deposits are held with large banks in the countries where they have been lodged. We believe that the credit risk related to our cash and reclamation deposits is negligible.

 

The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk is the carrying value of cash and reclamation deposits.

 

(ii) Liquidity risk

 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with its financial liabilities.

 

At June 30, 2019, our financial liabilities had expected maturity dates as follows:

 

    Fair value     Total
contractual
cash flows
    Less than
3 months
    Between
3 months and
1 year
    Between
1 year and
3 years
    More than
3 years
 
Trade payables   $ 707     $ 707     $ 707     $     $     $  
Lease obligations     103       119       10       31       78        
Newmont loan     8,988       11,815                   11,815        
    $ 9,798     $ 12,641     $ 717     $ 31     $ 11,893     $  

 

We manage liquidity by anticipating and maintaining adequate cash balances to meet liabilities as they become due. We review cash forecasts on a regular basis to determine whether the Company will have sufficient cash to meet future working capital needs.

 

(iii) Market risk

 

Market risk is the risk that the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments will fluctuate due to changes in market prices. The significant market risks to which the Company’s financial instruments are exposed are currency risk and interest rate risk.

 

(A) Currency risk

 

The Company is exposed to currency risk to the extent that monetary assets and liabilities held by the Company are not denominated in Canadian dollars. We have not entered into any foreign currency contracts or similar arrangements to mitigate this risk; however, we may do so in the future.

 

Page 24

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

Our financial instruments are held in Canadian dollars (“CAD”), US dollars (“USD”), and Mexican pesos (“MXN”). As such, our US- and Mexican-currency accounts and balances are subject to fluctuation against the Canadian dollar. Our financial instruments were denominated in the following currencies as at June 30, 2019:

 

    Canadian dollars
(thousands)
    US dollars
(thousands)
    Mexican pesos
(thousands)
 
Cash   $ 4,040     $ 567     $ 3,658  
Restricted cash     69       251        
Accounts receivable           14       269  
Reclamation deposits           150        
Trade payables     (530 )     (33 )     (799 )
Newmont loan                 (131,766 )
Total foreign currency     3,476       949       (128,638 )
Exchange rate     1.0000       1.3087       0.0682  
Equivalent Canadian dollars   $ 3,476     $ 1,242     $ (8,774 )

 

Based on the above net exposures as at June 30, 2019, and assuming that all other variables remain constant:

 

· a 10% appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would decrease loss by $89,000 and
· a 10% appreciation of the Mexican peso against the Canadian dollar would increase loss by $1,731,000.
     
(B) Interest rate risk

 

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. Our cash and our reclamation deposits are held mainly in saving accounts and term deposits and therefore there is currently minimal interest rate risk. Because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments, fluctuations in market rates do not have a significant impact on estimated fair values compared to carrying value.

 

The Company’s interest rate risk arises principally from the changes in interest rates related to term deposits where our cash and reclamation deposits are held. A one percent change increase in interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $g50,000 to the Company’s loss for the six months ended June 30, 2019.

 

The fair value of the Newmont loan is subject to interest rate risk as it is marked to market at each reporting date. The fair value would have decreased by $162,000 had interest rates been 1% higher.

 

Page 25

 

 

Exhibit 99.58

 

 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

 

Three and six months ended June 30, 2019

 

Canadian dollars

 

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2019   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

1. Overview

 

Orla Mining Ltd. is a mineral exploration and development company which trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol OLA. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. Refer to page 26 of this document for a list of abbreviations used.

 

Our corporate strategy is to acquire and develop mineral exploration properties where our expertise can substantially increase shareholder value. We have two material gold projects with near-term production potential based on open pit mining and heap leaching – the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama.

 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 (the “financial statements”), and the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 which were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). You can find additional information regarding the Company, including our Annual Information Form, on SEDAR under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com.

 

All monetary amounts herein are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.

 

This MD&A is current as of August 9, 2019.

 

Hans Smit, P. Geo, our Chief Operating Officer, is the Qualified Person, as the term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). He has reviewed and approved the technical information disclosed in this MD&A.

 

2. Highlights

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2019 and to the date of this MD&A,

 

· the Company announced positive Feasibility Study results for the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold project, and subsequently filed a NI 43-101 Technical Report,
· the Company completed an early warrant exercise incentive program, raising $3.6 million (of which $0.4 million was received prior to June 30, and $3.2 million was received subsequent to June 30),
· general elections were held in Panama in May 2019, which resulted in a change in federal government effective July 1, 2019.

 

3. Discussion of Operations

 

A. Camino Rojo, Mexico

 

Project Description and History

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Goldcorp Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine and consists of eight concessions covering in aggregate approximately 206,000 hectares. In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc. (a predecessor company to Newmont). As currently understood, Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with exploration potential.

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2019   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Canplats Resources Corporation (“Canplats”) initially discovered gold-silver mineralization at Camino Rojo in 2007, and they subsequently completed 39,725 metres of drilling, largely delineating the shallow oxide mineralization. Canplats also carried out metallurgical studies prior to being acquired by Goldcorp in 2010. Goldcorp then completed more than 250,000 metres of drilling, conducted airborne and ground geophysical surveys, did extensive geological and mineralogical investigations, and conducted numerous metallurgical studies, which included detailed mineralogical studies, column leach tests on oxide material, size fraction analysis, variability test work and sulphide flotation studies.

 

The Ejido San Tiburcio holds the surface rights over the main area of known mineralization. Exploration has been carried out under the authority of agreements between the project operators and the Ejido San Tiburcio. There is a temporary occupation agreement in place with the Ejido San Tiburcio, with the right to expropriate, covering all the area of the mineral resource and area of potential development described in the Camino Rojo Report. Other temporary occupation agreements allow surface access for exploration activities in various other parts of the large property. The Company has water rights in the area of the proposed development.

 

The Company has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. However, if sulphide projects are defined through one or more positive pre-feasibility studies with certain development scenarios meeting certain criteria, Newmont has an option to enter into a joint venture with Orla for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of such a sulphide project. If Newmont exercises its option, Orla’s share of the costs to develop the project might be carried to production by Newmont. Orla has a right of first refusal on a sale if Newmont elects to sell its portion of the sulphide project, in whole or in part. The Camino Rojo Asset Purchase Agreement was filed on SEDAR on June 28, 2017. Details of the joint venture are available in our news release dated November 7, 2017, which is available here.

 

On June 24, 2019, we issued the results of a positive Feasibility Study along with a Mineral Reserve estimate on the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project. The Feasibility Study supports a technically simple open-pit mine and heap-leach operation with low capital and operating costs providing rapid payback and a strong financial return. An independent technical report prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 is available at www.sedar.com under Orla's profile. The new mineral reserve estimate at Camino Rojo includes proven and probable mineral reserves of 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne ("g/t") and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. All mineral reserves are contained and accessible from within Orla's mineral concessions.

 

Updated measured and indicated mineral resources, inclusive of mineral reserves, amount to 353.4 million tonnes at 0.83 g/t gold and 8.83 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 9.46 million ounces of gold and 100.4 million ounces of silver. Inferred mineral resources are 60.9 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold and 7.41 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 1.70 million ounces of gold and 14.5 million ounces of silver. Further details on the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates are provided below.

 

Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

The Camino Rojo Feasibility Study considers near-surface open pit mining of 44.0 million tonnes of oxide and transitional ore at a throughput rate of 18,000 tonnes per day. Ore from the pit will be crushed to 80% passing 28 mm, conveyor stacked onto a heap leach pad and leached using a low concentration sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant where gold and silver will be precipitated and doré will be produced. The site's proximity to infrastructure, low stripping ratio, compact footprint and flat pad location all contribute to project simplicity and relatively low estimated AISC of US$576 per ounce of gold.

 

The Feasibility Study was prepared by a team of independent industry experts led by Kappes Cassiday and Associates ("KCA") and supported by Independent Mining Consultants ("IMC"), Resource Geosciences Incorporated ("RGI"), Barranca Group LLC, Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., and HydroGeoLogica Inc (“HGL”).

 

The Feasibility Study incorporates geological, assay, engineering, metallurgical, geotechnical, environmental and hydrogeological information collected by Orla and previous owners since 2007, including 370,566 metres of drilling in 911 holes. Predicted average gold recoveries of 64% are based on results from 85 column tests.

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2019   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Operating costs are based on contract mining with all other mine components being owned and operated by Orla. Capital costs were estimated primarily using budgetary supplier quotes for all major and most minor equipment as well as contractor quotes for major construction contracts.

 

The following tables presents the key assumptions and detailed results of the Feasibility Study:

 

Table 1: Summary of Key Assumptions and Economics of the Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

Production Data   Values   Units
Life of Mine     6.8   years
Mine Throughput     18,000   tonnes/day
Mine Throughput     6,570,000   tonnes/year
Total Tonnes to Crusher     44,020,000   tonnes
Grade Au (Average)     0.73   g/t
Grade Ag (Average)     14.2   g/t
Contained Gold oz     1,031,000   ounces
Contained Silver oz     20,093,000   ounces
Metallurgical Recovery Gold (Overall)     64   %
Metallurgical Recovery Silver (Overall)     17   %
Average Annual Gold Production     97,000   ounces
Average Annual Silver Production     511,000   ounces
Total Gold Produced     662,000   ounces
Total Silver Produced     3,479,000   ounces
LOM Strip Ratio     0.54    waste : ore
           
Operating Costs (Average LOM)          
Mining (mined)   US$ 2.14   /tonne mined
Mining (processed)   US$ 3.30   /tonne processed
Processing & Support   US$ 3.38   /tonne processed
G&A   US$ 1.75   /tonne processed
Total Operating Cost   US$ 8.43   /tonne processed
By-Product Cash Cost   US$ 515   /ounce Au
All-in Sustaining Cost   US$ 576   /ounce Au

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2019   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Capital Costs (Excluding value added tax)            
Initial Capital   US$ 123     million
LOM Sustaining Capital   US$ 20     million
LOM Capital   US$ 144     million
Working Capital and Initial Fills   US$ 10     million
Closure Costs   US$ 20     million

 

Financial Analysis            
Gold Price Assumption   US$ 1,250     /ounce
Silver Price Assumption   US$ 17     /ounce
Average Annual Cashflow (Pre-Tax)   US$ 72     million
Average Annual Cashflow (After-Tax)   US$ 56     million
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pre-Tax   38.6%     %
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax   28.7%     %
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax)   US$ 227     million
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax)   US$ 142     million
Pay-Back Period (After-Tax)   3.0     years

 

Note: See reference below regarding non-GAAP metrics. Feasibility Study economics include a 2% royalty and use a USD:MXN exchange rate of 19.3

 

The proposed mine is located 3 kilometres from a paved 4-lane highway and approximately 190 kilometres from the city of Zacatecas. The area is flat and there are no known social or environmental impediments to mining. Orla has all surface, mineral and water rights to develop the project as presented in the Feasibility Study and existing wells produce in excess of the average 24 litres per second of water required for the project.

 

There are no residents within the area of proposed development. The town of San Tiburcio is located 4 kilometres to the east of the proposed development. Orla has a Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement with the Ejido San Tiburcio and a 30-year temporary occupation right with an expropriation right over the 2,497 hectares covering the proposed pit and infrastructure area. Orla has an active community and social program in San Tiburcio and other nearby communities of El Berrendo and San Francisco.

 

We have substantially completed the required permit applications and expect to submit them in the third quarter of 2019. The construction of the Camino Rojo Oxide Project is expected to start in the first half of 2020 upon receipt of all required permits and project financing. First gold production is planned for mid 2021.

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2019   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Sensitivity to Gold Price

 

Table 2: Project Economics Sensitivities to Gold Price

 

Gold Price (US$/oz) US$ 1,150 US$ 1,200 US$ 1,250 US$ 1,300 US$ 1,350 US$ 1,400
After-tax NPV 5% (US$ millions) US$ 109 US$ 125 US$ 142 US$ 158 US$ 174 US$ 190
After-tax IRR (%) 24.0% 26.4% 28.7% 31.0% 33.2% 35.4%
Payback (years) 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.6

 

Comparison to the May 2018 Preliminary Economic Assessment

 

On May 29, 2018, Orla announced the results of a Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") on the Camino Rojo Project. The PEA operational plan was also based on an open pit mine, 2-stage crushing and heap leach recovery of gold and silver. In addition to much more detailed and rigorous cost estimations, engineering and project definition, the Feasibility Study benefited from the results of an additional 18 column leach tests, geotechnical evaluations including test pits and drilling under proposed infrastructure, geotechnical evaluations of pit slopes, ground water evaluations and testing of rock geochemistry to allow closure planning.

 

In addition to the higher level of confidence in key operational and economic parameters, changes from the PEA to the Feasibility Study include:

 

· Increase of the north pit wall angle to 53° for the entire wall below the first few benches versus 45° for all but the bottom-most benches in the PEA. This results in a deeper pit, increased tonnage of material to be processed, and an overall increase in contained gold and silver ounces.

 

· Decrease in projected gold recoveries from 67% in the PEA to 64% in the Feasibility Study as the deeper pit results in a higher proportion of transitional material with lower than average recovery. The recovery model was also updated with the new column leach data.

 

Opportunities

 

The mine plan in the Feasibility Study was developed entirely on Orla's mineral concessions and constrained by the property boundary with no impact to land outside Orla’s mineral concessions. An agreement with the owner of the concession bordering Orla's to the north would allow for the open pit to extend onto the adjacent concession. Such agreement would result in an expanded pit with access to additional oxide and transitional material below the feasibility study pit, which would add to the mine life and/or annual throughput with only modest equipment and infrastructure additions. Orla remains optimistic that an agreement can be reached with the owner of the adjacent concession.

 

The Feasibility Study only considers oxide and transitional material as testing shows gold cannot be economically recovered by the heap leach method from sulphide material. Orla is actively working on studies to investigate economic opportunities that may exist within the 7.3 million ounces of gold contained within the sulphide measured and indicated mineral resources.

 

Orla has title to mineral concessions covering a very large area around the Camino Rojo deposit. Overburden makes exploration challenging, but the discovery in 2007 of mineralization that is incorporated into this Feasibility Study and mineral resource estimate shows that shallow cover can hide very large near-surface deposits. Orla has been trying various exploration techniques and Induced Polarization ("IP") geophysics appears to be the most useful tool. A large area southeast of the current mineral resource has recently been surveyed and drilling on the anomalies identified is expected to start within the next two months. Additional oxide material in the vicinity of the planned development would leverage the infrastructure being proposed in the Feasibility Study. Any additional sulphide material could add to the long-term potential of the property.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2019   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Capital and Operating Costs

 

Initial capital expenditures or pre-production capital for the Camino Rojo project is estimated at US$123 million. Camino Rojo benefits from flat terrain and simple infrastructure limiting the amount of earthwork required during construction. Total capital for the life of the project, including working capital is estimated at US$154 million. The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the capital costs for the project.

 

Table 3: Capital Cost Summary (excl. value added tax)

 

Description   Cost (US$)
Pre-Production Capital   US$ 80,231,000
Indirect Costs   7,645,000
Other Owner's Costs   7,922,000
EPCM   8,544,000
Contingency   15,751,000
Mining Contractor Mobilization and Preproduction   3,022,000
Total Initial Capital   US$ 123,114,000
Working Capital and Initial Fills   10,187,000
Sustaining Capital – Mine and Process   20,424,000
Total LOM Capital (including working capital)   US$ 153,725,000
Closure Costs   US$ 19,813,000

 

The average life of mine operating cost for the Project is US$8.43 per tonne of ore processed. Operating costs were estimated from first principles with project specific staffing, quoted contract mining costs, unit consumptions of materials, supplies, power, water and delivered supply costs being considered.

 

The table below breaks down the different components of the operating costs:

 

Table 4: Life of Mine Operating Cost Summary

 

Description   LOM Cost
(US$/t processed)
 
Mine   US$         3.30  
Process and Support Services     3.38  
Site G & A     1.75  
Total   US$ 8.43  

 

Permitting

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by the federal government department known as SEMARNAT, which has authority over the two principal permits: (1) the Environmental Impact Statement (Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental or MIA, accompanied by a Risk Study), and (2) a Change of Land Use permit accompanied by a Technical Justification Study or ETJ.

 

In early 2018, Orla resumed environmental assessment activities on the project and surrounding area under the guidance of independent environmental permitting consultant Patricia Aguayo. Data from this work has been used in conjunction with information collected by previous operators and project information from Orla's consulting engineers to prepare the documents needed to apply for the MIA and Change of Land Use permits. Submission of permitting documents to SEMARNAT is anticipated during the third quarter of 2019.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2019   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The project is not located in an area with any special federal environmental protection designation and no factors have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required environmental permits. The legislated timelines for the review of properly prepared MIA and Change of Land Use applications and mine operating permits for a project that does not affect federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves are 120 calendar days and 105 working days, respectively, which can be completed concurrently.

 

Orla has contracted ERM, a global consulting company, to review the environmental assessment and proposed mitigation measures for the project. We plan to complete this work in accordance with International Finance Corporation Performance Standards, as well as the International Council on Mining and Metals principles.

 

Next Steps

 

With the Feasibility Study now complete, permit applications can be completed and we expect to submit them in the coming weeks. Orla is acquiring bids for a contract to provide engineering and procurement support ("EPCM") to the project. Construction-level engineering and procurement efforts will be initiated in the third quarter of 2019 to meet the goal of starting construction in the first half of 2020.

 

Finally, we are working with our advisors to develop an optimum financing structure to finance the development of the project. The process is progressing well, and discussions are underway with various lenders and financiers.

 

Mineral Reserves

 

Camino Rojo comprises intrusive related, sedimentary strata hosted, polymetallic gold, silver, arsenic, zinc, and lead mineralization. The mineralized zones correspond to zones of sheeted sulphidic veins and veinlet networks, creating a bulk-mineable style of gold mineralization. Mineralization is almost completely oxidized to a depth of approximately 120 metres and then variably oxidized below (transitional to sulphide). The mineral resource estimate was divided into oxide, high and low transitional, and sulphide material. Only the oxide and transitional material were considered in the Feasibility Study for heap leach extraction.

 

The mineral reserve estimate for Camino Rojo is based on an open pit mine plan and mine production schedule developed by IMC. All mineral reserves are located on, and are accessible from, Orla's concessions and support the 6.8-year mine life.

 

The following table presents the initial mineral reserve estimation for the Camino Rojo Oxide Project. Proven and probable mineral reserves amount to 44.0 million tonnes at 0.73 g/t gold and 14.2 g/t silver for 1.03 million contained gold ounces and 20.1 million contained silver ounces. The mineral reserve was estimated based on a gold price of US$1,250 per ounce and a silver price of US$17.00 per ounce. Measured mineral resource in the mine production schedule was converted to proven mineral reserve and indicated mineral resource in the schedule was converted to probable mineral reserve.

 

Table 5: Camino Rojo Mineral Reserves

 

Reserve Class   000's tonnes     Gold (g/t)     Silver (g/t)     Gold (koz)     Silver (koz)  
Proven Mineral Reserve     14,595       0.79       15.1       369.7       7,104  
Probable Mineral Reserve     29,424       0.70       13.7       661.1       12,991  
Total Proven & Probable Reserve     44,019       0.73       14.2       1,031.0       20,095  

 

Notes:
1. The mineral reserve estimate has an effective date of June 24, 2019. Mineral reserves are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council (as amended) in accordance with the disclosure requirement of NI 43-101
2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding
3. Mineral reserves are based on prices of US$1,250/oz gold, US$17/oz silver, USD/MXN exchange rate of 19.3

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2019   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

4. Mineral reserves are based on net smelter return cut-off that vary by time period to balance mine and plant production capacities. They range from a low of US$4.73/t to a high of US$9.00/t
5. Operating costs — mining US$1.94/t mined; process US$3.41/t processed; G&A US$1.32/t processed, includes a 2% royalty
6. Recoveries for gold — Kp 70%, Ki 56%, Transition Hi 60%; Transition Lo 40%;
Recoveries for silver — Kp 11%, Ki 15%, TrHi 27%, TrLo 34%7.
7. Gold and silver 100% payable; Refining cost per ounce — Au US$5.00; Ag US$0.50/oz

 

Mineral Resources

 

As part of the Feasibility Study efforts, IMC updated the mineral resource estimate from the previous estimate prepared as of April 27, 2018 and previously reported in Orla's May 29, 2018 news release. Mineral resources were divided between oxide and transitional material that could possibly be extracted by open pit mine and processed in a heap leach operation ("Leach Resource") and sulphide material that could possibly be extracted by open pit and processed in a mill ("Mill Resource"). For the Mill Resource, estimates were made for contained gold, silver, lead and zinc. As lead and zinc would not be recovered in a heap leach operation, only gold and silver were estimated for the Leach Resource.

 

Table 6: Mineral Resource Estimate — Gold & Silver

 

Resource Type   000's
tonnes
    Gold
(g/t)
    Silver
(g/t)
    Gold
(koz)
    Silver
(koz)
 
Leach Resource   Measured Mineral Resource     19,391       0.77       14.9       482.3       9,305  
    Indicated Mineral Resource     75,249       0.70       12.2       1,680.7       29,471  
    Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     94,640       0.71       12.7       2,163.0       38,776  
    Inferred Mineral Resource     4,355       0.86       5.6       119.8       805  
                                             
Mill Resource   Measured Mineral Resource     3,358       0.69       9.2       74.2       997  
    Indicated Mineral Resource     255,445       0.88       7.4       7,221.4       60,606  
    Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     258,803       0.88       7.4       7,295.6       61,603  
    Inferred Mineral Resource     56,564       0.87       7.5       1,576.9       13,713  
                                             
Total Mineral Resource   Measured Mineral Resource     22,749       0.76       14.1       556.5       10,302  
    Indicated Mineral Resource     330,694       0.84       8.5       8,902.1       90,078  
    Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     353,443       0.83       8.8       9,458.6       100,379  
    Inferred Mineral Resource     60,919       0.87       7.4       1,696.7       14,518  

 

Table 7: Mineral Resource Estimate — Zinc & Lead

 

Resource Type   000's
tonnes
    Lead
(%)
    Zinc
(%)
    Lead
(M lbs)
    Zinc
(M lbs)
 
Mill Resource Measured Mineral Resource     3,358       0.13       0.38       9.3       28.2  
  Indicated Mineral Resource     255,445       0.07       0.26       404.3       1,468.7  
  Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     258,803       0.07       0.26       413.6       1,496.8  
  Inferred Mineral Resource     56,564       0.05       0.23       63.1       290.4  

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three and six months ended June 30, 2019   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Notes:

1. The mineral resource has an effective date of June 7, 2019. The mineral resources are classified in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards in accordance with the disclosure requirement of NI 43-101
2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding
3. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability
4. Mineral resources for leach material are based on prices of US$1,400/oz gold and US$20/oz silver
5. Mineral resources for mill material are based on prices of US$1,400/oz gold, US$20/oz silver, US$1.05/lb lead, and US$1.20/lb zinc
6. Mineral resources are based on net smelter return cut-off of US$4.73/t for leach material and US$13.71/t for mill material
7. Includes 2% royalty and an USD:MXN exchange rate of 19.3
8. Operating costs for Leach resource — mining US$1.65/t mined; process US$3.41/t processed; G&A US$1.32/t processed; Operating costs for Mill resource — mining US$1.65/t mined; process US$12.50/t processed; G&A US$1.20/t processed
9. Leach resource payable — Au 100%; Ag 100%;
Mill resource payable — Au 95%, Ag 95%, Pb 95%, Zn 85%
10. Leach resource refining costs — Au US$5.00/oz; Ag US$0.50/oz; Mill resource refining costs — Au US$1.00/oz; Ag US$1.50/oz; Pb US$0.194/lb; Zn US$0.219/lb
11. The mineral resource estimate assumes that the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto land held by the adjacent owner. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the adjacent owner
12. Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves
13. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an indicated mineral resource and must not be converted to a mineral reserve.
    It is reasonably expected that the majority of inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated mineral resources with continued exploration.

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate "reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction" extends onto lands where mineral title is held by an adjacent owner and that waste would be mined on the adjacent owner's mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that would include an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate (oxide and sulphide material) would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with that property owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the adjacent property owner. Delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Orla intends to seek an agreement with the adjacent owner, to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. We cannot give any assurance that we will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. The development scenario presented in the Feasibility Study, including the mineral reserve estimate, does not require a layback agreement with the adjacent owner.

 

Project Risks

 

The Company is not aware of any factors which would prevent a project similar to that modelled in the Feasibility Study from being carried out. There is a risk that permitting will take longer than the legislated timeline which could result in project delays. Social issues have caused delays to some projects in Mexico. Orla has an active community and social program and has maintained good relationships with local communities. In addition to being good corporate policy, the Company considers this to be the best way to reduce social risk.

 

Data Verification

 

IMC and RGI verified the sampling data used for the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimate. A substantial portion of the database was compared with original assay certificates. There were no limitations on the verification process. IMC and RGI are of the opinion that the database is acceptable for the purpose of the Feasibility Study, including the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimation. RGI verified the Orla sampling data used for the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimate.

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

KCA checked the metallurgical test procedures and results to ensure they met industry standards. Metallurgical sample locations were reviewed to ensure that there was material from throughout the resource area and that samples were reasonably representative of the material planned to be processed, to support the selected process method and assumptions regarding recoveries and costs. Additional data verification information can be found in the Amended Camino Rojo Technical Report dated March 11, 2019, and has been incorporated in the new Camino Rojo Technical Report that was filed on SEDAR on August 6, 2019.

 

Qualified Persons

 

The Feasibility Study was overseen by KCA of Reno, Nevada. IMC of Tucson, Arizona conducted the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates under the direction of Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM. Mr. Hester was also responsible for the mining components of the Feasibility Study. KCA, under the direction of Carl Defilippi, RM SME, was responsible for the metallurgy, process, general and administration and economic components of the Feasibility Study. Matthew Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. (AIPG), of Resource Geosciences Incorporated of Rio Rico, Arizona was responsible for the property, geology and environmental components of the Feasibility Study. David Hawkins, C.P.G. (AIPG), was responsible for the hydrogeology model. Each of Messrs. Hester, Defilippi, Gray and Hawkins is a Qualified Person for their respective sections of the Feasibility Study and each of whom is independent of Orla under the definitions of NI 43-101.

 

Non-GAAP Measures

 

The Company has included certain non-GAAP performance measures as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers and the non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to the Company.

 

Cash Costs per Ounce — we calculated cash costs per ounce by dividing the sum of operating costs, royalty costs, production taxes, refining and shipping costs, net of by-product silver credits, by payable gold ounces. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, we believe that this measure is useful to external users in assessing operating performance.

 

All-In Sustaining Costs ("AISC") — we have provided an AISC performance measure that reflects all the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, our definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. We believe that this measure is useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the Company’s ability to generate free cash flow from current operations.

 

Other activities during the three months ended June 30, 2019, and Future Plans

 

Work to complete the feasibility study was the primary focus for the Camino Rojo project in Q2 of 2019. Other activities included completing a second production well close to the propose open pit, constructing three monitoring wells around the proposed heap leach pad and pump testing wells as part of groundwater evaluation efforts. We drilled 200 metres in Q2 in 3 holes. All drilling was by RC methods for ground water monitoring wells.

 

We continued periodic sampling of established monitoring wells for groundwater elevations and water quality as part of ongoing environmental monitoring. We are compiling permit application documents for mine development and expect to submit these in Q3 of this year.

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Company received permits to drill test chargeability anomalies outlined by an IP survey completed earlier in the year and drilled the first four holes in July, subsequent to the end of Q2. No wide alteration zones were encountered. Assay results have not been returned to date. Additional targets will be drilled in August.

 

Significant CSR activities in Q2 2019 included:

 

· Initiating construction of a preschool in El Berrendo;
· Organizing support for a resident doctor in San Tiburcio;
· Continuing to support Adult Education programs;
· Supporting a number of community events.

 

B. Cerro Quema Project, Panama

 

Project Description and History

 

Our 100%-owned Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open-pit mine with process by heap leaching. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the areas of the current mineral resources and mineral reserves, proposed mine development and the priority drill targets.

 

Mineral concessions are comprised of three contracts between the Republic of Panama and Minera Cerro Quema S.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of Orla. The original 20-year term for these concessions expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). The Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications were received, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal. We have received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. A permit was received on May 8, 2018 to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018, we received two permits to use water for drilling. An existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current mineral resources was extended for two years in May 2018. In October 2018, the government accepted our 2018 concession tax payments, and in February 2019, we paid the 2019 concession tax payments. A new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions was received on February 11, 2019. General elections were held in Panama in May 2019, which resulted in a change in federal government effective July 1, 2019.

 

The Company owns the surface rights for land required to mine the Cerro Quema mineral reserves and to construct and operate a heap leach facility, and part of the land required for proposed upgrades to the project access road.

 

A predecessor company to Orla issued a mineral resource estimate and a Pre-Feasibility Study for Cerro Quema, and an independent technical report entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”).

 

The Cerro Quema Report envisions a standard open pit mine with two pits, one at La Pava and one at Quemita, coupled with a 10,000 tonne per day heap leach facility to extract the gold. With an average head grade of 0.77 g/t Au and a crush size of 80% passing minus 50 mm, an average gold recovery of 86% was estimated. This would result in 418,000 ounces of gold production over a 5.3-year mine life.

 

The Cerro Quema Report, which contains the 2014 mineral resource and mineral reserve estimate and Pre-Feasibility Study, was filed on SEDAR by Pershimco Resources Inc. on August 22, 2014. You can download it from SEDAR here.

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Cerro Quema Mineral Reserves

 

Zone   Category     Cut-Off
(Au g/t)
    Tonnes
(millions)
    Au
(g/t)
    Au
(koz)
 
      Proven       0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
La Pava     Probable       0.21       7.40       0.67       159  
      Sub-Total       0.21       14.22       0.73       335  
      Proven       0.21                    
Quema     Probable       0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
      Sub-Total       0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
      Proven       0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
Total     Probable       0.21       12.89       0.75       312  
      Total       0.21       19.71       0.77       488  

 

Notes:
(1) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
(2) A cut-off grade of 0.21 g/t of gold is used for reporting mineral reserves.
(3) Mineral reserves are estimated at a gold price of US$1,300 per ounce.
(4) Effective as of June 30, 2014.
(5) See NI 43-101 Technical Report “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” published on August 15, 2014 for additional information. A copy of the report is available on the Company’s website and under the SEDAR profile of Pershimco Resources Inc. at www.sedar.com.

 

Activities during the three months ended June 30, 2019

 

The Company has an ongoing environmental management plan that includes maintaining sediment dams, reforestation of previously disturbed areas and active sediment control activities. Baseline surface water quality sampling and groundwater level measurements are also ongoing.

 

The Company has an active community relations program that includes providing hot lunches to 5 to 15-year-old children studying in the 12 schools located within a 15 kilometre radius of the Project. We also provide support for various local amateur sports teams, a youth orchestra, local fairs, and cultural events.

 

There have been no exploration activities at Cerro Quema to date in 2019 as the Company has focused its efforts at the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Future Plans

 

The metallurgical test work conducted during 2018 is part of the Company's effort to update the 2014 Pre-Feasibility Study (“PFS”). We expect to complete the update of the 2014 PFS, including new mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates, in the first half of 2020. In addition to the work on oxide mineralization, we will continue to advance exploration of the Caballito copper-gold sulphide discovery. This style of mineralization, identified late last year, presents potential value to the project in addition to the current heap-leach oxide gold project. In addition to the 1.2 km long trend north of Caballito through to Quemita, the Pelona area in the eastern part of the project provides extensive target areas for additional Caballito-style mineralization.

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

C. Monitor Gold Project, Nevada

 

Option Agreements

 

The Monitor Gold Project is a grassroots project in an area where work by past operators showed extensive areas with samples anomalous in gold and other metals associated with alteration, including silicification, within carbonate rocks. Stratigraphic assemblages known to host mineral deposits elsewhere in Nevada are found in the area and there are a number of major structures which could provide conduits for mineralizing fluids. We undertook compilation and evaluation of 2018 results during the quarter ended June 30, 2019. No significant field work was carried out.

 

4. Summary of Quarterly Results

 

The figures in the following table are based on the financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. The figures have been restated because of a change in accounting policy (see note 3 of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018) and are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars.

 

    2019-Q2     2019-Q1     2018-Q4     2018-Q3     2018-Q2     2018-Q1     2017-Q4     2017-Q3  
Exploration expense   $ 3,515     $ 7,503     $ 6,066     $ 7,056     $ 4,438     $ 5,273     $ 3,156     $ 2,804  
General and administrative     162       217       183       144       126       108       88       82  
Professional fees     148       125       176       79       202       136       46       43  
Regulatory and transfer agent     46       41       205       19       14       40       1       6  
Salaries and wages     564       550       836       422       230       234       813       210  
Depreciation     23       39       40       40       37       36       3       2  
Share based payments     907       1,253       1,065       601       1,523       796       812       822  
Interest income     (30 )     (62 )     (105 )     (134 )     (117 )     (86 )     (35 )     (50 )
Interest expense     1                                            
Foreign exchange     11       13       (133 )     10       (146 )     (6 )     (258 )     472  
Fair value changes     76       357       187       153       100       65       8       3  
Impairment of investment                                         27        
Impairment mineral properties                                         261        
Tax expense           4                                      
Net loss   $ 5,423     $ 10,040     $ 8,520     $ 8,390     $ 6,407     $ 6,596     $ 4,922     $ 4,394  
Loss per share (basic and diluted)   $ 0.03     $ 0.06     $ 0.05     $ 0.05     $ 0.04     $ 0.04     $ 0.03     $ 0.03  

 

During 2017, our exploration activity almost entirely focused on Cerro Quema, as we did not acquire the Camino Rojo project until the end of 2017. In 2018, we conducted work on both Cerro Quema and Camino Rojo. To date in 2019, we continued work on, completed, and publicly filed the feasibility study for Camino Rojo. Quarterly variations are due to seasonality and timing of mining concession fees, drilling activities and awaiting results from previous quarters’ exploration activities.

 

Administrative costs have trended with the level of activity of the Company. Professional fees have trended with (a) the general activity level of the Company, and (b) major regulatory events such as financings and public listings. The increase in regulatory fees in 2018-Q4 is due to a one-time initial listing fee as the Company started trading on the TSX Exchange.

 

The increase in salaries and wages in 2017-Q4 was related to an accrual of short-term incentive (bonus) payments, as was the increase in 2018-Q3. In 2018-Q4, we accrued for payments related to the departure of the former CEO. Salaries have generally increased in 2019 as we have increased our capabilities in preparation for the construction phase at Camino Rojo.

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Share based payments expense is generally related to the number of stock options and RSUs outstanding vesting during the quarter. The grants happened during 2017-Q2, 2018-Q2, and 2019-Q1; consequently, those quarters tend to be greater than others as some of the vesting occurs on the date of the grant. The increase in share-based payments in 2018-Q4 was related to options and bonus shares granted to the incoming CEO.

 

Interest income is directly related to cash on hand and prevailing interest rates. From 2018-Q1, we started receiving loan advances from Goldcorp, which led to fair value adjustments each quarter, based on changes in (i) prevailing interest rates, (ii) foreign exchange rates, and (iii) estimates of maturity date.

 

Foreign exchange gains and losses vary based on fluctuation of the Canadian dollar versus US dollar and Mexican peso amounts on hand. We tend to hold most of our funds in Canadian dollars until needed.

 

The impairment in mineral properties in 2017-Q4 was the write-off of the Blue Quartz project.

 

5. Second Quarter of 2019

 

The following table is based on financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Figures are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars.

 

A. Comparison to the previous quarter

 

    2019-Q2     2019-Q1     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense   $ 3,515     $ 7,503     $ (3,988 )  

During Q1, we incurred (i) land payments upon conclusion of agreements with local ejidos, and (ii) annual water use and concession fees payments which are paid semi-annually in Q1 and Q3 each year.

The Camino Rojo feasibility study was substantially completed during Q2.

General and administrative     163       217       (54 )   Lower travel, technology consulting costs, and office lease costs in Q2.
Professional fees     148       125       23     Increased legal costs in Q2 due to the early warrant exercise program and preparation for project financing.
Regulatory and transfer agent     46       41       5      
Salaries and wages     564       550       14      
Depreciation     23       39       (16 )    
Share based payments     907       1,253       (346 )   Annual option, RSU, DSU grant occurred in 2019-Q1.
Interest income     (31 )     (62 )     31     Lower cash balances on hand.
Interest expense     1             1     New office lease commencing in Q2.
Foreign exchange     11       13       (2 )    
Fair value changes     76       357       (281 )   Relate primarily to the Newmont loan.
Tax expense           4       (4 )    
Net loss   $ 5,423     $ 10,040     $ (4,617 )    

 

Page 15

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

B. Comparison to the same quarter last year

 

    2019-Q2     2018-Q2     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense   $ 3,515     $ 4,462     $ (947 )   Decreased activity at Cerro Quema in 2019.
Office and administrative     163       126       37     Overall increased activity over last year.
Professional fees     148       202       (54 )   In 2018, we instituted new RSU and DSU plans, which attracted greater professional fees.  Also, in 2019, we decreased our reliance on outside services providers, bringing some of the work in-house.
Regulatory and transfer agent     46       14       32      
Salaries and wages     564       230       334     Increased staffing as we prepare for construction activities.
Depreciation     23       33       (10 )    
Share based payments     907       1,523       (616 )   Annual grant in 2019 was in Q1 vs Q2 in 2018.
Interest income     (31 )     (182 )     151     Lower cash balances on hand.
Interest expense     1             1     New office lease commencing in 2019-Q2
Foreign exchange     11       (138 )     149     Strengthening of the CAD vs USD in 2019-Q2, compared to a weakening of the CAD during 2018-Q2
Fair value changes     76       157       (81 )   Fair value change of the Newmont loan
Net loss   $ 5,423     $ 6,427     $ (1,004 )    

 

6. Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Historically the Company's primary source of funding has been the issuance of equity securities for cash, typically through private placements to sophisticated investors and institutions. We have issued common share capital in many of the past few years, pursuant to private placement financings and the exercise of warrants and options. Our access to exploration and construction financing is always uncertain, and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant equity or debt funding.

 

We had working capital of approximately $3.0 million as at June 30, 2019, compared with $13.6 million at December 31, 2018. Subsequent to June 30, 2019, we raised approximately $3.2 million pursuant to the exercise of warrants.

 

As part of the acquisition of the Camino Rojo Project in November 2017, Goldcorp (now Newmont) agreed to provide interest free loans to the Company for all annual land holding costs as they are incurred at Camino Rojo until December 31, 2019, which loans are to be repaid in cash or shares (at Orla’s option subject to certain restrictions) upon reaching commercial production at Camino Rojo. To June 30, 2019, a total of MXN 173 million ($11.8 million) had been advanced pursuant to this agreement (to December 31, 2018 – MXN 121 million, or $8.2 million). Subsequent to June 30, 2019, we received a further approximately MXN 46 million ($3.2 million) from Newmont pursuant to this agreement. Accordingly, we believe the Company will have sufficient capital resources to maintain its properties in good standing for the next twelve months.

 

We expect to fund the operating costs of the Company over the next twelve months with cash on hand, and with further equity and/or debt financings.

 

The Company had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of June 30, 2019 nor as of the date of this MD&A. We have no other lines of credit or sources of financing which have been arranged but remain unused.

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Our ability to carry out our long range strategic objectives in future periods depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing activities.

 

7. Use of Proceeds

 

On February 15, 2018, the Company completed a brokered financing of 17,581,200 units at a price of $1.75 for gross proceeds of $30,767,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. The Company incurred issuance costs of $1,777,000.

 

As detailed in the table below comparing the approximate use of proceeds from the Company’s offering of units completed in February 2018 and the actual amounts spent as of June 30, 2019, the Company has spent the full amount allocated under the February 2018 prospectus. There are no material variances to the use of proceeds in the February 2018 prospectus that have impacted our ability to achieve our business objectives and milestones as disclosed in the February 2018 prospectus.

 

in thousands of Canadian dollars   Intended use
of proceeds
per Feb 2018
prospectus
    Spent to
June 30
 2019
 
Camino Rojo Project                
   Project management   $ 400     $ 422  
   Drilling (core, metallurgy)     4,300       3,085  
   Engineering, technical studies and geology     3,500       3,794  
   Environment, CSR, permitting, ejido     1,800       1,174  
   Field & site support     1,200       2,630  
   Value-added taxes (IVA)     1,300       1,182  
Cerro Quema project                
   Drilling     1,900       1,989  
   Environment, CSR, permitting, community     2,000       507  
   Engineering, technical studies and geology     2,000       1,500  
   Camp and support, and project management     1,500       1,778  
   Salaries and benefits     2,000       2,342  
Other                
   Exploration and project evaluation     850       1,029  
   Working capital and general corporate     2,335       5,072  
Total:   $ 25,085     $ 26,504  

 

At the Camino Rojo project, our intent was to complete a PEA, which was completed in Q2 of 2018 and then a subsequent Feasibility Study, which was completed at the end of Q2 of 2019. Our intent was also to complete environmental assessments and permitting documents required to develop an open pit mine and heap leach facility. This work is nearly complete and permit applications are expected to be submitted in Q3-2019. We had planned to drill regional exploration targets but our regional work focused mainly on target identification, largely through ground geophysics, rather than drilling. Much of the CSR and land payments were funded via an interest free loan from Newmont.

 

At the Cerro Quema project, our intent was to collect the geological, geophysical, and other data required to support the undertaking of an updated mineral resource estimate and a pre-feasibility study on the project and to continue exploration of the Caballito discovery. We conducted exploration drilling and metallurgical drilling and completed IP surveys in furtherance of these objectives.

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

8. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements requiring disclosure under this section.

 

9. Related Party Transactions

 

This information is provided in note 11 of the accompanying quarterly financial statements.

 

10. Critical Accounting Estimates

 

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

We review estimates and their underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.

 

Judgements, estimates, and assumptions that we have made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in these consolidated financial statements include:

 

A. Functional currency

 

The functional currency for the parent entity and each of its subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of functional currency involves judgements to identify the primary economic environment. We reconsider the functional currency of each entity if there is a change in the underlying transactions, events and conditions which we used to determine the primary economic environment of that entity.

 

B. Business combinations

 

Determining whether a set of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute the acquisition of a business or the acquisition of an asset requires us to make certain judgements as to whether or not the assets acquired and liabilities assumed include the inputs, processes and outputs necessary to constitute a business as defined in IFRS 3 «Business Combinations». If an acquired set of assets and liabilities includes goodwill, the set is presumed to be a business. Based on an assessment of relevant facts and circumstances, management of the Company concluded that the acquisitions of Cerro Quema in 2016 and of Camino Rojo in 2017 were acquisitions of assets. The values assigned to common shares, stock options and warrants issued and the allocation of the purchase price to the net assets in the acquisition were based on estimates and judgements including discount rates, volatility, expected duration of option and warrant and the relative fair values of the net assets.

 

C. Exploration and evaluation expenditures

 

The application of the Company’s accounting policy for E&E expenditure requires judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely from either future exploitation or sale (prior to which we expense all E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we capitalize the acquisition costs). It also requires us to make judgements on whether activities have reached a stage that permits development of the mineral resource (prior to which they are treated as E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we treat such costs as projects under development and construction).

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

We must also apply a number of estimates and assumptions, such as the determination of the quantities and types of mineral resources, which itself involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on resource classification (measured, indicated or inferred). These estimates directly impact accounting decisions related to our E&E expenditures.

 

We must make certain estimates and assumptions about future events and circumstances, particularly, whether economic mineral exploitation is viable. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, we assess indicators of impairment and may conclude to write off such amounts to the statement of profit or loss.

 

D. Title to mineral properties

 

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. Further, we make judgements for properties where concessions terms have expired, and a renewal application has been made and is awaiting approval. We use judgement as to whether the concession renewal application is probable to be received, but ultimately this is beyond our control. If a renewal application is not approved, we could lose rights to those concession.

 

E. Assessment of impairment indicators

 

We apply judgement in assessing whether indicators of impairment or reverse impairment exist for our E&E assets which could result in a test for impairment. We consider internal and external factors, such as our rights to explore, planned expenditures on E&E activities, the technical results of our E&E activities, and the potential for viable operations, to determine whether there are any indicators of impairment or reversal of a previous impairment.

 

F. Share based payments

 

We issue, grant or award different types of share based payments. These include warrants, options, restricted share units, deferred share units, and bonus shares.

 

We make judgments of expected forfeiture rates, the expected lives of these instrument, expected volatilities, and risk free interest rates. In a unit offering, we prorate the proceeds between common shares and warrants using the relative fair value method, the allocation of which requires significant judgement. In the case of bonus shares we use our judgement to estimate expected vesting periods and vesting probabilities.

 

G. Fair value of the Newmont loan

 

We make estimates and assumptions in determining the fair value of the Newmont loan. The loan is repayable at the time of commercial production. Timing and method-of-payment of the ultimate loan repayment are uncertain, and we make estimates of date of repayment, interest rates applicable, and exchange rates. Also uncertain is the exact method of repayment – it may be possible to extinguish this liability by the issuance of common shares, or by the payment of cash in currencies other than the Mexican peso. These uncertainties will result in actual future expenditures differing from the amounts currently provided. Consequently, there could be significant adjustments to the fair value established, which would affect future financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position.

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

H. Site closure provisions

 

We make estimates and assumptions in determining the provisions for asset retirement and site closure. The ultimate rehabilitation costs are uncertain, and cost estimates can vary in response to many factors, including judgements of the extent of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, and regulatory changes. We make estimates of rehabilitation costs and of cost increases, inflation rates, and discount rates. These uncertainties will result in actual future expenditures differing from the amounts currently provided. Consequently, there could be significant adjustments to the provisions established, which would affect future financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position.

 

11. Financial Instruments

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is inherently exposed to certain financial risks, including market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk, through the use of financial instruments. The timeframe and the manner in which we manage these risks varies based upon our assessment of these risks and available alternatives for mitigation. We do not acquire or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All transactions undertaken are to support our operations.

 

A discussion of these financial risks and our exposure to them is provided in the notes to the accompanying interim financial statements, and in the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Page 20

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

12. Outstanding Share Data

 

As of the date of this MD&A, the Company had the following equity securities outstanding:

 

· 185,412,010 common shares

 

· 18,528,000 warrants

 

· 11,220,115 stock options

 

· 1,500,000 bonus shares

 

· 1,021,639 restricted share units

 

· 473,066 deferred share units

 

You can find further details about these potentially issuable securities in the notes to the accompanying financial statements, and in the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

13. Risks and Uncertainties

 

As the Company has not commenced principal operations, historical revenue and expenditure trends are not indicative of future activity. The Company has committed to certain work expenditures and may enter into future agreements. The ability of the Company to fund its future operations and commitments is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing. Risks of the Company’s business include the following:

 

Permits and Licenses

 

The exploitation and development of mineral properties may require the Company to obtain regulatory or other permits and licenses from various governmental licensing bodies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain all necessary permits and licenses that may be required to carry out exploration, development and mining operations on its properties.

 

The Company is awaiting mineral concession renewals at its Cerro Quema Project. There is no assurance that we will receive necessary approvals or extensions, or receive them within a reasonable period of time. Failure to receive the permits or extensions would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations. Additional details are provided in the Cerro Quema Project section of this document.

 

Foreign Country and Political Risk

 

The Company’s principal mineral properties are located in Mexico and Panama. The Company is subject to certain risks, including currency fluctuations, possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mineral titles or other mineral rights, opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations, and mineral exploration and mining activities may be affected in varying degrees by political stability and government regulations relating to the mining industry. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its business. Exploration and development may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on future exploitation and production, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange controls, income taxes, royalties on production, expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine and/or site safety.

 

Operating in developing economies such as Mexico and Panama has certain risks, including changes to, or invalidation of, government mining regulations; expropriation or revocation of land or property rights; changes in foreign ownership rights; changes in foreign taxation rates; security issues; corruption; uncertain political climate; narco-terrorist actions or activities; and lack of a stable economic climate.

 

We do not carry political risk insurance.

 

Dependence on Exploration-Stage Properties

 

The Company’s current efforts are focused primarily on exploration stage properties. The Camino Rojo and the Cerro Quema Projects may not develop into commercially viable ore bodies, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s potential mineral resource production, profitability, financial performance and results of operations.

 

Estimates of Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves and Production Risks

 

The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates included in this MD&A are estimates based on a number of assumptions, including those stated herein, and any adverse change to those assumptions could require the Company to lower its mineral resource estimate. Until a deposit is actually mined and processed, the quantity and grades of mineral resources must be considered as estimates only. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. In addition, the quantity and/or economic viability of mineral resources may vary depending on, among other things, metal prices, grades, production costs, stripping ratios, recovery rates, permit regulations and other legal requirements, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions. Any material change in the quantity of mineral resources, grade or stripping ratio may affect the economic viability of the Company’s properties. No assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of minerals will in fact be realized or that an identified mineral resource will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) deposit that can be legally and economically exploited. There can also be no assurance that any discoveries of new mineral reserves will be made. Any material reductions in estimates of mineral resources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate assumes that the Company can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Company

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by another mining company (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study dated June 25, 2019, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The Feasibility Study was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the Feasibility Study.

 

Mineral resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions

 

The estimation of mineral resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

In particular, the estimation of mineral resources for the Camino Rojo Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the mineral resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached.

 

Although all mineralization included in the Company’s mineral resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the mineral resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in mineral resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Mining Industry

 

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the current exploration programs planned by the Company will result in a profitable commercial mining operation.

 

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on many factors, some of which are the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as metal prices which are highly cyclical and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

 

Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk. The Company’s operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration and development of ore, including unusual and unexpected geology formations, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. The Company’s mineral exploration activities are directed towards the search, evaluation and development of mineral deposits. There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Company as described herein will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of ore. There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the discovery and acquisition of properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company will compete with other interests, many of which with greater financial resources, for the opportunity to participate in promising projects. Significant capital investment is required to achieve commercial production from successful exploration efforts.

 

Government Regulation

 

The exploration activities of the Company are subject to various federal, provincial and local laws governing prospecting, development, taxes, labour standards, toxic substances and other matters. Exploration activities are also subject to various federal, provincial and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, and land reclamation. These laws also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Although the Company’s exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations governing operations and exploration activities, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations, amendments to current laws and regulations or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Company’s activities.

 

Title Matters

 

Although the Company has diligently investigated title to all mineral concessions (either granted or under re-application) and, to the best of its knowledge (except as otherwise disclosed herein), titles to all its properties are in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to any of the Company’s mineral properties and any of the Company’s properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected encumbrances or defects or governmental actions.

 

Land Title

 

The Company has investigated ownership of all surface rights in which it has an interest, and, to the best of its knowledge, its ownership rights are in good standing. However, all surface rights may be subject to prior claims or agreement transfers, and rights of ownership may be affected by undetected defects. While to the best of the Company's knowledge, titles to all surface rights are in good standing; however, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to the surface rights in which the Company has an interest. The properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and titles may be affected by undetected defects.

 

Environmental Risks and Hazards

 

All phases of the Company’s mineral exploration operations are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulations, laws and permits, if any, will not adversely affect the Company’s operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which the Company holds interests which are unknown to the Company at present, which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties. The Company may become liable for such environmental hazards caused by previous owners and operators of the properties even where it has attempted to contractually limit its liability.

 

Page 24

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Government approvals and permits are currently, and may in the future be, required in connection with the Company’s operations. To the extent such approvals are required and not obtained; the Company may be curtailed or prohibited from proceeding with planned exploration or development of mineral properties.

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

 

Commodity Prices

 

The profitability of mining operations is significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold and other minerals. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of these minerals and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in metal prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The price of gold and other minerals has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future serious price declines could cause commercial production to be impracticable.

 

Uninsured Risks

 

The Company carries insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers adequate. Risks not insured against include environmental pollution or other hazards against which such corporations cannot insure or against which they may elect not to insure.

 

Compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws

 

Orla is subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (1999). In general, these laws prohibit a company and its employees and intermediaries from bribing or making other prohibited payments to foreign officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. The Company’s primary operations are located in Panama, a country which is perceived as having fairly high levels of corruption. Orla cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future anti- corruption regulatory requirements to which the Company’s operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

 

Failure to comply with the applicable legislation and other similar foreign laws could expose the Company and/or its senior management to civil and/or criminal penalties, other sanctions and remedial measures, legal expenses and reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the applicable anti-corruption legislation by Canadian or foreign authorities could also have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

As a consequence of these legal and regulatory requirements, the Company has instituted policies with regard to business ethics, which have been designed to ensure that Orla and its employees comply with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that such efforts have been and will be completely effective in ensuring the Company’s compliance, and the compliance of its employees, consultants, contractors and other agents, with all applicable anticorruption laws and regulations.

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

Certain directors of the Company also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in natural resource exploration and development. Consequently, there exists the possibility for such directors to be in a position of conflict. Any decision made by such directors involving the Company will be made in accordance with their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with the Company and such other companies. In addition, such directors will declare, and refrain from voting on, any matter in which such directors may have a conflict of interest.

 

Page 25

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

14. Forward Looking Statements

 

This MD&A contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding planned exploration and development programs and expenditures, the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, expectations on the potential extension of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema project; proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema project and the Camino Rojo project; Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits, required agreements with third parties and regulatory approvals, including but not limited to, the receipt of the Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) permit related to the Cerro Quema project and other necessary permitting required to implement expected future exploration plans; community and ejido relations; availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of mineral reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; currency and interest rate fluctuations. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the future price of gold, anticipated costs and the Company’s ability to fund its programs, the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities, the Company’s ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements, the timing and results of drilling programs, the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Company’s mineral properties, the obtaining of an agreement with the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein) to develop the entire Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate, the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects, the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner and the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements include, among others: (i) failure to obtain required regulatory and stock exchange approvals with respect to any Offering; (ii) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (iii) delays in or failure to obtain an agreement with the Adjacent Owner with respect to the Camino Rojo Project; (iv) health, safety and environmental risks; (v) success of exploration, development and operations activities; (vi) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (vii) delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (viii) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (ix) uncertainty in estimates of production, capital and operation costs and potential for production and cost overruns; (x) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (xi) the fluctuating price of gold; (xii) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xiii) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; and (xiv) the Company’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions.

 

Page 26

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risks and Uncertainties” in this MD&A for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this MD&A and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. You are urged to read the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which you can view online under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com

 

15. Abbreviations Used

 

$ Canadian dollars
AIF Annual Information Form
AISC All in Sustaining Cost
Ag Silver
Au Gold
Camino Rojo PEA Report An independent technical report for the Camino Rojo Project entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 (the “Camino Rojo PEA Report”) prepared by Carl E. Defilippi, RM, SME of Kappes Cassiday & Associates (“KCA”), Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. of Resource Geosciences Incorporated (“RGI”), and Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM of Independent Mining Consultants Inc. (“IMC”).  
Canplats Canplats Resources Corporation
Cerro Quema Report
or
2014 PFS
An independent technical report for the Cerro Quema Project entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”) prepared by Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA.  
CFE Comisión Federal de Electricidad, the state-owned electric utility of Mexico
CIM Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Company Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Page 27

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Three and six months ended June 30, 2019
Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CSR Community and Social Responsibility
EPCM Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management
ESIA Estudio de Impacto Ambiental, a Panamanian environmental impact study
g/t Grams per metric tonne
G&A General and administrative costs
GAAP Generally accepted accounting principles, which for the Company are IFRS
Goldcorp Goldcorp Inc., a predecessor company to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, prior to April 18, 2019.
MXN Mexican pesos
Newmont Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, a publicly traded company resulting from the combination of Newmont Mining Corporation and Goldcorp Inc., effective April 18, 2019.
ha Hectares
HGL HydroGeoLogica Inc.
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
IMC Independent Mining Consultants Inc.
IP Induced polarization
IRR Internal rate of return
K tonnes Thousands of metric tonnes
Koz Thousands of troy ounces
KCA Kappes Cassiday and Associates
LOM Life of mine
M&I Measured and indicated
MD&A Management's Discussion and Analysis
MIA Manifiesto de Impacto Ambiental.  In English, an Environmental Impact Statement
NI 43-101 Canadian National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects”
NPV Net present value
PEA Preliminary Economic Assessment
Pb Lead
PFS Pre-Feasibility Study
RC Reverse circulation
RGI Resource Geosciences Incorporated
SEDAR The System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval, a filing system operated by the Canadian Securities Administrators, accessible at: www.sedar.com
SEMARNAT Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.  In English, the Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (Mexico)
t Metric tonne, equal to 1,000 kilograms (approximately 2,205 pounds)
TSX Toronto Stock Exchange
US$ United States dollars
Zn Zinc

 

Page 28

 

Exhibit 99.59

 

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Jason Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended June 30, 2019.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on April 1, 2019 and ended on June 30, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date:     August 9, 2019

 

/s/ Jason Simpson  

Jason Simpson

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.60

 

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended June 30, 2019.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on April 1, 2019 and ended on June 30, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.
   
Date: August 9, 2019

 

/s/ Etienne Morin  

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

     

 

 

Exhibit 99.61 

 

NEWS RELEASE    

 

Orla mining Files feasibiliTy study Technical Report on Camino Rojo oxide gold Project

 

VANCOUVER, BC – August 7, 2019 – Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) ("Orla" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that the Company has filed a technical report, prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, for its 100% owned Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project located in Zacatecas State, Mexico. Orla previously released the results of the Feasibility Study (see News Release dated June 25, 2019) which demonstrate a robust project with low capital intensity, rapid payback, and high margins. A summary of key assumptions and results contained in the technical report is presented below. The technical report is available on SEDAR under the Company's profile at www.sedar.com and on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Feasibility Study Highlights  
Throughput Rate per Day 18,000 tonnes
Total Ore to Leach Pad 44.0 M tonnes
Average Grade Au / Ag (g/t) 0.73 / 14.2
Contained Gold / Silver Ounces 1,031,000 / 20,093,000
Average Recovery Au / Ag 64% / 17%
Average Annual Gold Production 97,000 ounces
Strip Ratio (waste : ore) 0.54
Initial Capex $123 million
Avg. LOM Operating costs (per tonne of ore processed) $8.43
Total By-Product Cash Cost ($/oz Au) $515
All-In Sustaining Cost (“AISC”) ($/oz Au) $576
Pre -Tax - Net Present Value (5%) $227 million
Pre-Tax Internal Rate of Return 38.6%
After-Tax - Net Present Value (5%) $142 million
After-Tax Internal Rate of Return 28.7%
Payback 3.0 years

 

The Feasibility Study was conducted using $1,250/oz gold and $17/oz silver and is expressed in U.S. dollars.

 

ORLA MINING LTD. #202-595 Howe St., Vancouver BC V6C 2T5 TSX: OLA | www.orlamining.ca 

 

 

 

 

 

Permitting

 

We are finalizing the reports required to submit permit application for the Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (“MIA”) and the Change of Land Use (“ETJ”) permits. Submission of the permit documents to SEMARNAT is expect by the end of August 2019.

 

Qualified Persons

 

The independent technical report was overseen by Kappes Cassiday & Associates and authored by Carl Defilippi, RM SME, Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM, Matthew Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G (AIPG), and David Hawkins, C.P.G. (AIPG), each of whom is an Independent Qualified Person under NI 43-101.

 

Hans Smit, P.Geo. Chief Operating Officer of Orla, has reviewed and verified all technical and scientific information contained in this news release and is a Qualified Person within the meaning of NI 43-101.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 200,000 hectares. Estimated Mineral Reserves as of June 24, 2019 are 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne (“g/t”) and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. (Comprised of Proven Mineral Reserves of 14,595,000 tonnes at 0.79 g/t gold and 15.1 g/t silver and Probable Mineral Reserves of 29,424,000 tonnes at 0.70 g/t gold and 13.7 g/t silver). The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company's profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the "Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits" dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

On behalf of the Board of Directors

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD. #202-595 Howe St., Vancouver BC V6C 2T5 TSX: OLA | www.orlamining.ca  2 

 

 

 

 

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

www.orlamining.com

info@orlamining.com

 

Forward-looking and Cautionary Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the results of the Feasibility Study, including but not limited to the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plan and operations, internal rate of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present value, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; the timing and costs for production decisions; financing timelines and requirements; permitting timelines and requirements; requirements for additional land; exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources; upside opportunities including pit wall angles, land agreements, the development of the sulphide mineral resource and exploration potential; timing for start of construction, receipt of permits; timing for first gold production; and the Company's objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions regarding the price of gold and silver; the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, including changes in the economic parameters; risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses, as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company’s most recently filed management’s discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 28, 2019, available on www.sedar.com. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

Non-IFRS Measures

 

The Company has included certain non-IFRS performance measures as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers and the non-IFRS measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.

 

Cash Costs per Ounce – the Company calculated cash costs per ounce by dividing the sum of operating costs, royalty costs, production taxes, refining and shipping costs, net of by-product silver credits, by payable gold ounces. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, the Company believes that this measure will be useful to external users in assessing operating performance.

 

All-In Sustaining Costs (“AISC”) – the Company has disclosed an AISC performance measure that reflects all of the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, the Company's definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. The Company believes that this measure will be useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the ability to generate free cash flow from current operations.

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD. #202-595 Howe St., Vancouver BC V6C 2T5 TSX: OLA | www.orlamining.ca  3 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.62

 

Feasibility Study

NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project

Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico

 

Prepared for:

 

 

202 – 595 Howe Street

Vancouver, BC, V6C 2T5

Canada

 

 

Prepared by:

 

  Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
7950 Security Circle
Reno, NV 89506

 

Report Effective Date: 25 June 2019

Mineral Reserve Effective Date: 24 June 2019

 

Authors:

Carl Defilippi, Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, RM SME

Michael Hester, Independent Mining Consultants, Inc., FAusIMM

Dr. Matthew Gray, Resource Geosciences Incorporated, CPG

David Hawkins, Barranca Group, LLC, CPG

 

     
     

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Contents

 

1.0   SUMMARY 1-1
   
1.1     Introduction and Overview 1-1
1.2     Property Description and Ownership 1-1
1.3     Geology & Mineralization 1-2
1.4     Exploration and Drilling 1-3
1.5     Metallurgical Test Work 1-4
1.6     Mineral Resource Estimate 1-5
1.7     Mineral Reserve Estimate 1-8
1.8     Mining Methods 1-11
1.9     Recovery Methods 1-11
1.10   Infrastructure 1-12
1.11   Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact 1-13
1.12   Capital and Operating Costs 1-15
1.13   Cautionary Statements 1-17
1.13.1   Forward Looking Information 1-17
1.13.2   Non-IFRS Measures 1-18
1.14   Economic Analysis 1-19
1.15   Interpretations and Conclusions 1-22
1.15.1   Conclusions 1-22
1.15.2   Opportunities 1-22
1.15.3   Risks 1-23
1.15.3.1   Mining 1-23
1.15.3.2   Metallurgy and Process 1-24
1.15.3.3   Access, Title and Permitting 1-24
1.15.3.4   Other Risks 1-25
1.16   Recommendations 1-26
1.16.1   KCA Recommendations 1-26
1.16.2   RGI Recommendations 1-26
1.16.3   Barranca Recommendations 1-26
   
2.0   INTRODUCTION 2-1
   
2.1     Introduction and Overview 2-1
2.2     Project Scope and Terms of Reference 2-1
2.2.1   Scope of Work 2-1
2.2.2   Terms of Reference 2-3
2.3     Sources of Information 2-3
2.4   Qualified Persons and Site Visits 2-4
2.5   Frequently Used Acronyms, Abbreviations, Definitions and Units of Measure 2-6

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

3.0   RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS 3-1
   
4.0   PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 4-1
   
4.1   Area and Location 4-1
4.2   Claims and Title 4-2
4.2.1   Orla Control of Mining Concessions via Acquisition from Minera Peñasquito SA de CV 4-6
4.2.2   Pending Concession Reductions 4-7
4.3   Surface Rights 4-7
4.4   Environmental Liability 4-10
4.5   Permits 4-11
4.6   Access, Title, Permit and Security Risks 4-11
4.6.1   Access Risks 4-11
4.6.2   Title Risks 4-11
4.6.3   Permit Risks 4-12
4.6.4   Security Risks 4-13
4.7   Royalties 4-13
   
5.0   ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY 5-1
   
5.1   Accessibility 5-1
5.2   Physiography, Climate and Vegetation 5-3
5.3   Local Resources and Infrastructure 5-4
   
6.0   HISTORY 6-1
   
6.1   Prior Ownership 6-1
6.2   Prior Exploration 6-1
6.3   Historical Metallurgical Studies 6-4
6.4   Historical Resource Estimates 6-4
6.4.1   Canplats 6-4
6.4.2   Goldcorp 6-4
6.5   Prior Production 6-4
   
7.0   GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION 7-1
   
7.1   Sources of Information 7-1
7.2   Regional Geology 7-1
7.3   Local Geology 7-4
7.3.1   General Deposit Geology 7-4
7.3.2   Structural Setting 7-7
7.3.3   Mineralized Zones 7-7
7.3.4   Alteration 7-11
7.4   Oxidation 7-11
7.5   Conclusions 7-13

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

8.0   DEPOSIT TYPES 8-1
   
9.0   EXPLORATION 9-1
   
10.0   DRILLING 10-1
   
10.1   General 10-1
10.2   Canplats Drilling 10-2
10.3   Goldcorp Drilling 10-3
10.4   Orla Drilling 10-4
10.5   Sampling 10-5
10.5.1   Canplats and Goldcorp Sampling 10-5
10.5.2   Orla Sampling 10-6
10.6   Conclusions 10-6
10.6.1   IMC Conclusion 10-6
10.6.2   RGI Conclusion 10-6
   
11.0   SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY 11-1
   
11.1   Sample Preparation 11-1
11.2   Analyses 11-1
11.3   QA/QC Programs 11-2
11.3.1   Canplats QA/QC Program 11-2
11.3.2   Goldcorp QA/QC Program 11-2
11.3.3   Orla QA/QC Program 11-4
11.4   Sample Security 11-6
11.4.1   Canplats and Goldcorp Sample Security 11-6
11.4.2   Orla Sample Security 11-6
   
12.0   DATA VERIFICATION 12-1
   
12.1   Resource Model Data 12-1
12.1.1   Canplats and Goldcorp Drill Data 12-1
12.1.1.1   Assay Data 12-1
12.1.1.2   Collar Locations 12-1
12.1.1.3   Canplats RC Data 12-2
12.1.2   Orla Drill Data 12-3
12.1.3   Historical Data Reviews 12-3
12.1.3.1   Canplats 12-3
12.1.3.2   Goldcorp 12-3
12.2   Metallurgical Test Data 12-4
12.3   Site Visits by Qualified Persons 12-4

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

13.0   MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING 13-1
   
13.1   Canplats (2009 & 2010) 13-3
13.1.1   SGS Mineral Services (2009) 13-3
13.1.1.1   SGS Mineral Services 2009 – Column Leach Tests 13-3
13.1.1.2   SGS Mineral Services 2009 – Bottle Roll Leach Tests 13-5
13.1.1.3   SGS Mineral Services 2009 – Flotation Tests 13-7
13.1.2   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2010) 13-8
13.1.2.1   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2010) – Head Analyses and Cyanide Shake Tests 13-8
13.1.2.2   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2010) – Column Leach Tests 13-11
13.2   Goldcorp (2012-2015) 13-12
13.2.1   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2012) 13-13
13.2.1.1   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2012) - Head Analyses 13-13
13.2.1.2   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2012) – Bottle Roll Leach Tests 13-15
13.2.1.3   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2012) – Column Leach Test Work 13-19
13.2.2   Blue Coast Research Metallurgy (2012-2013) 13-21
13.2.3   Hazen Research (2014) 13-22
13.2.4   Comminution Testing 13-22
13.2.5   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2014 & 2015) 13-23
13.2.5.1   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2015) – Head Analyses 13-26
13.2.5.2   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2014 & 2015) – Bottle Roll Leach Tests 13-29
13.2.5.3   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2015) – Column Leach Test Work 13-31
13.3   Orla (2019) 13-32
13.3.1   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019) 13-33
13.3.1.1   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019) – Head Analyses & Physical Characterization 13-37
13.3.1.2   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019) – Bottle Roll Leach Tests 13-41
13.3.1.3   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019) – Agglomeration Test Work 13-42
13.3.1.4   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019) – Column Leach Test Work 13-42
13.3.1.5   Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019) – Diagnostic Leach Test Work 13-47
13.4   Conclusions from Metallurgical Programs 13-48
13.4.1   Crush Size and Recovery 13-50
13.4.2   Leach Cycle 13-53
13.4.3   Reagent Consumption Projection 13-53
13.4.3.1   Cyanide 13-53
13.4.3.2   Lime 13-54
13.5   Preg Robbing Discussion 13-54
13.6   Sulphide Mineralization Discussion 13-58

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

14.0   MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES 14-1
   
14.1   Mineral Resource 14-1
14.1.1   Metal Prices for Mineral Resources 14-3
14.1.2   Cost and Recovery Estimates for Mineral Resources 14-3
14.1.3   Parameters for Mill Material 14-6
14.1.4   Additional Information 14-7
14.2   Description of the Block Model 14-10
14.2.1   General 14-10
14.2.2   Geological Controls 14-10
14.2.3   Potentially Contaminated RC Samples 14-20
14.2.4   Cap Grades and Compositing 14-20
14.2.5   Variograms 14-27
14.2.5.1   Northeast Domain 14-27
14.2.5.2   Southwest Domain 14-27
14.2.6   Block Grade Estimation 14-33
14.2.7   Resource Classification 14-38
14.2.8   Bulk Density 14-45
14.2.9   Mineral Resource Reconciliation 14-46
14.2.9.1   Leach Material 14-46
14.2.9.2   Mill Material 14-47
14.2.9.3   Total Leach Plus Mill Material 14-47
   
15.0   MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE 15-1
   
15.1   Mineral Reserve 15-1
15.2   Economic Parameters 15-4
   
16.0   MINING METHODS 16-1
   
16.1   Operating Parameters and Criteria 16-1
16.2   Slope Angles 16-1
16.3   Final Pit Design 16-4
16.4   Mine Production Schedule 16-6
16.5   Waste Storage Area and Stockpile 16-11
16.6   Mining Equipment 16-22
   
17.0   RECOVERY METHODS 17-1
   
17.1   Process Design Basis 17-1
17.2   Process Summary 17-2
17.3   Crushing 17-6
17.4   Reclamation and Conveyor Stacking 17-7
17.5   Leach Pad Design 17-8
17.6   Solution Application & Storage 17-12

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

17.7   Process Water Balance 17-16
17.7.1    Precipitation Data 17-16
17.7.2    Water Balance 17-18
17.8   Merrill-Crowe Recovery Plant 17-22
17.8.1    Refinery 17-25
17.8.2    Process Reagents and Consumables 17-26
17.8.2.1   Lime 17-27
17.8.2.2   Sodium Cyanide 17-27
17.8.2.3   Zinc 17-30
17.8.2.4   Lead Nitrate 17-30
17.8.2.5   Diatomaceous Earth 17-30
17.8.2.6   Antiscalant 17-30
17.8.2.7   Fluxes 17-30
   
18.0   PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE 18-1
   
18.1   Infrastructure 18-1
18.1.1     Existing Installations 18-1
18.1.2     Site Roads 18-1
18.1.3     Mine Haulage Road 18-1
18.1.4     Project Buildings 18-2
18.1.5     Administrative Offices 18-2
18.1.6     Mine Camp Facilities 18-2
18.1.7     Merrill-Crowe Process Facility 18-4
18.1.8     Refinery 18-4
18.1.9     Laboratory 18-5
18.1.10   Process Maintenance Workshop 18-5
18.1.11   Reagent Storage 18-5
18.1.12   Mine Truck Shop 18-5
18.1.13   Light Duty Truck Shop 18-6
18.1.14   Fuel Storage and Dispensing 18-6
18.1.15   Warehouse and Fenced Laydown Yard 18-6
18.1.16   Magazine Site 18-6
18.1.17   Guard Shack and Security 18-7
18.1.18   Medical Clinic 18-7
18.1.19   Fenced Areas 18-7
18.1.20   Airstrip 18-8
18.2   Power Supply, Communication Systems & IT 18-8
18.2.1     Power Supply 18-8
18.2.2     Site Distribution 18-9
18.2.3     Estimated Electric Power Consumption 18-9
18.2.4     Emergency Power 18-10
18.2.5     Communications 18-10

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

18.3   Water 18-10
18.3.1   Water Supply 18-10
18.3.2   Potable and Domestic Water 18-11
18.3.3   Fire Water and Protection 18-11
18.3.4   Surface Water Management 18-12
18.4   Sewage 18-12
   
19.0   MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS 19-1
   
20.0   ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT 20-1
   
20.1   Environmental Studies 20-1
20.1.1   Project Area Description 20-1
20.1.1.1   Climate 20-1
20.1.1.2   Soils 20-1
20.1.1.3   Hydrology 20-1
20.1.1.4   Physiography 20-2
20.1.1.5   Seismicity 20-2
20.1.1.6   Vegetation 20-2
20.1.1.7   Fauna 20-3
20.1.2   Environmental Management Plans 20-3
20.1.2.1   Surface Water Management 20-3
20.1.2.2   Ground Water Management 20-4
20.1.2.3   Air Quality Management 20-5
20.1.2.4   Wildlife Management 20-5
20.1.2.5   Cyanide Management Plan 20-5
20.1.3   Waste Handling 20-5
20.1.3.1   Hazardous Wastes 20-5
20.1.3.2   Non-hazardous Wastes 20-5
20.1.3.3   Putrescible (Domestic) Waste Disposal 20-6
20.1.3.4   Boneyard Storage 20-6
20.1.3.5   On-site BioRemediation Cell 20-6
20.1.3.6   Waste Water (Sewage) Disposal 20-6
20.1.4   Reclamation 20-6
20.1.4.1   Soil Handling 20-8
20.1.4.2   Camp 20-8
20.1.4.3   Central Operating Area 20-8
20.1.4.4   Mine Pits 20-8
20.1.4.5   Waste Rock Storage Facility (Mine Waste Dumps) 20-9
20.1.4.6   Roads 20-11

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.5   Closure Activities – Heap Leach Facilities 20-13
20.1.5.1   Chemistry 20-13
20.1.5.2   Permanent Surface Water Diversion Works 20-14
20.1.5.3   Permanent Slope Stabilization 20-14
20.1.5.4   Final Engineering and Monitoring Plans 20-15
20.1.5.5   Heap Rinsing, Neutralization and Solution Management of   HLP Seepage 20-15
20.1.5.6   Heap Slope Grooming and Slope Stabilization 20-16
20.1.5.7   Cover, Topsoil Placement and Revegetation of Heap and      Surrounding Areas 20-16
20.1.5.8   Ponds and Pump Stations 20-16
20.1.5.9   Physical and Mobile Equipment 20-16
20.1.5.10 Roads, Diversion Works and Erosion Controls 20-17
20.1.5.11 Fencing 20-17
20.1.6   Post Closure Activities 20-17
20.1.6.1   Physical Monitoring and Maintenance 20-17
20.1.6.2   Geochemical Monitoring and Maintenance 20-17
20.1.6.3   Biological Monitoring and Maintenance 20-18
20.1.6.4   Surplus Water Management 20-18
20.1.7   Closure Cost Estimates – Heap Leach Facilities 20-19
20.2   Permitting 20-20
20.3   Social and Community Impact 20-25
20.3.1   Background 20-25
20.3.2   Population and Demographics 20-26
20.3.2.1   Indigenous Communities 20-26
20.3.2.2   Inhabitants, Age and Gender 20-26
20.3.2.3   Education 20-28
20.3.3   Infrastructure and Public Services 20-29
20.3.4   Government and Community 20-31
20.3.5   Economic Activity, Income, Marginalization 20-33
20.3.6   Social Management System and Mitigation of Negative Impacts 20-35
   
21.0   CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS 21-1
   
21.1   Capital Expenditures 21-2
21.1.1   Mining Capital Costs 21-4
21.1.1.1   Mining Contractor Mobilization and Demobilization 21-4
21.1.1.2   Mining Owner Equipment 21-4
21.1.1.3   Mine Development (Preproduction) 21-6

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

21.1.2   Process and Infrastructure Capital Cost Estimate 21-7
21.1.2.1     Process and Infrastructure Capital Cost Basis 21-7
21.1.2.2     Major Earthworks and Liner 21-8
21.1.2.3     Civils 21-9
21.1.2.4     Structural Steel 21-9
21.1.2.5     Platework 21-9
21.1.2.6     Mechanical Equipment 21-9
21.1.2.7     Piping 21-10
21.1.2.8     Electrical 21-10
21.1.2.9     Instrumentation 21-11
21.1.2.10   Infrastructure & Buildings 21-11
21.1.2.11   Supplier Engineering and Installation Supervision / Commissioning 21-12
21.1.2.12   Process Mobile Equipment 21-12
21.1.2.13   Spare Parts 21-12
21.1.2.14   Process & Infrastructure Contingency 21-12
21.1.2.15   Process & Infrastructure Sustaining Capital 21-13
21.1.3   Construction Indirect Costs 21-13
21.1.4   Other Owner’s Construction Costs 21-14
21.1.5   Initial Fills Inventory 21-15
21.1.6   Engineering, Procurement & Construction Management 21-16
21.1.7   Working Capital 21-17
21.1.8   IVA 21-17
21.1.9   Exclusions 21-17
21.2   Operating Costs 21-17
21.2.1   Mining Operating Costs 21-18
21.2.1.1     Contract Mining Cost Basis 21-20
21.2.1.2     Blasting & Mine Technical Services Costs 21-20
21.2.1.3     Pit Wall Support Costs 21-20
21.2.1.4     Presplitting for Wall Control 21-21
21.2.2   Process and G&A Operating Costs 21-25
21.2.2.1     Personnel and Staffing 21-27
21.2.2.2     Power 21-27
21.2.2.3     Consumable Items 21-28
21.2.2.4     Heap Leach Consumables 21-28
21.2.2.5     Recovery Plant Consumables 21-29
21.2.2.6     Laboratory 21-29
21.2.2.7     Fuel 21-29
21.2.2.8     Miscellaneous Operating & Maintenance Supplies 21-29
21.2.2.9     Mobile / Support Equipment 21-30
21.2.2.10   G&A Expenses 21-30
21.3   Reclamation & Closure Costs 21-32

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

22.0   ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 22-1
   
22.1   Summary 22-1
22.2   Methodology 22-4
22.2.1   General Assumptions 22-4
22.3   Capital Expenditures 22-6
22.4   Metal Production 22-8
22.5   Royalties 22-9
22.6   Operating Costs 22-9
22.7   Closure Costs 22-9
22.8   Taxation 22-9
22.8.1   Value Added Tax (IVA) 22-9
22.8.2   Federal Income Tax 22-10
22.8.3   Special Mining Tax 22-10
22.8.4   Zacatecas Environmental “Green Tax” 22-10
22.8.5   Depreciation 22-10
22.8.6   Loss Carry Forward 22-11
22.9   Economic Model & Cash Flow 22-11
22.10   Sensitivity 22-14
   
23.0   ADJACENT PROPERTIES 23-1
   
24.0   OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION 24-1
   
24.1   Project Implementation 24-1
24.1.1   Project Development 24-1
24.1.2   Project Controls 24-1
24.1.3   Procurement and Logistics 24-2
24.1.4   Construction 24-2
24.1.5   Construction Schedule 24-3
24.2   Site Geotechnical Analyses 24-5
24.2.1   Heap Leach Pad Stability 24-5
24.3   Hydrogeology 24-5
24.3.1   Occurrence and Movement of Groundwater 24-6
24.3.2   Groundwater Quality 24-8
24.3.3   Drilling and Aquifer Testing 24-11
24.3.4   Computer Modeling of Effects of Proposed Groundwater Withdrawal 24-12
24.3.4.1   Summary of Computer Modeling 24-12
24.3.5   Model Limitations 24-16
24.4   Sulphides 24-16

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 10

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

25.0   INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 25-1
   
25.1   Conclusions 25-1
25.1.1   Mining 25-1
25.1.2   Metallurgy and Process 25-1
25.1.3   Environmental and Permitting 25-2
25.2   Opportunities 25-3
25.2.1   Mining 25-3
25.2.2   Mineral Resource 25-3
25.2.3   Metallurgy and Process 25-3
25.2.4   New Mineral Zones 25-4
25.3   Risks 25-4
25.3.1   Mining 25-4
25.3.2   Metallurgy and Process 25-5
25.3.3   Access, Title and Permitting 25-5
25.3.4   Other Risks 25-6
   
26.0   RECOMMENDATIONS 26-1
   
26.1   KCA Recommendations 26-1
26.2   RGI Recommendations 26-1
26.3   Barranca Recommendations 26-2
   
27.0   REFERENCES 27-1
   
28.0   DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE 28-1

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

FIGURES

 

Figure 1-1      After-Tax IRR vs. Gold Price, Capital Cost, Operating Cost & Exchange Rate 1-21
Figure 1-2      NPV @ 5% vs. Gold Price, Capital Cost, Operating Cost & Exchange Rate 1-21
Figure 4-1      Location Map, Camino Rojo Project 4-2
Figure 4-2      Mining Concessions, Camino Rojo Property 4-5
Figure 4-3      Surface rights in Project Area 4-8
Figure 5-1      Project Location and Regional Infrastructure 5-2
Figure 5-2      View of Typical Topography and Vegetation at Camino Rojo 5-3
Figure 6-1      Historical Drillhole Locations and Project Claim Boundaries 6-3
Figure 7-1      Regional Geologic Map (Servicio Geológico Mexicano, 2000) 7-3
Figure 7-2      Local Geology, Camino Rojo Deposit (Servicio Geológico Mexicano, 2014) 7-5
Figure 7-3      Drillcore from CR12-345D, 818m 7-6
Figure 7-4      Drillcore from CR12-345D, 254m 7-6
Figure 7-5      Drillcore from CR12-345D, 993m 7-7
Figure 7-6      Drillcore from CR12 345D, 395m 7-9
Figure 7-7      Drillcore from CR12 345D, 727m 7-9
Figure 7-8      Drillcore from CR11 267D, 490m 7-10
Figure 7-9      Drillcore from CR11 267D, 473m 7-10
Figure 7-10    Drillcore from CR11 258D, 256m 7-12
Figure 7-11    Drillcore from CR11 258D, 257m 7-12
Figure 9-1      Chargeability Features, 300m to 400m, from Orla’s 2018 and 2019 IP Survey 9-1
Figure 10-1    Drilling by Type, IMC 2019 10-7
Figure 10-2    Drilling by Company, IMC 2019 10-8
Figure 13-1    Column Leach Test Sample Locations (Orla, 2019) 13-2
Figure 13-2    Preg-Robbing Percentage vs. CIL & Direct Bottle Roll Leach Test Recoveries – KCA 2014 13-29
Figure 13-3    Preg-Robbing Percentage vs. CIL & Direct Bottle Roll Leach Test Recoveries – KCA 2015 13-30
Figure 13-4    CIL-Direct Bottle Roll Au Extraction Difference vs. Organic Carbon Content – KCA 2015 13-31
Figure 13-5    Sample Drill Hole Locations for KCA 2019 Test Program 13-34
Figure 13-6    Water Wash Summary 13-46
Figure 13-7    Detoxification Summary, INCO SO2 13-46
Figure 13-8    Diagnostic Leach Results Summary – KCA 2019 13-48
Figure 13-9    Kp Oxide Recovery vs. Crush Size 13-50
Figure 13-10  Ki Oxide Recovery vs. Crush Size 13-51
Figure 13-11  Trans-Hi Recovery vs. Crush Size 13-51
Figure 13-12  Trans-Lo Recovery vs. Crush Size 13-52
Figure 13-13  Organic Carbon Versus Preg-Robbing 13-56

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 12

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 13-14  Areas with +10% Preg-Robbing Test Results 13-57
Figure 13-15  Recovery Versus Preg-Robbing 13-57
Figure 14-1    Mineral Resource Constraining Cone Shell, IMC 2019 14-9
Figure 14-2    Hole and Cross Section Locations, IMC 2019 14-11
Figure 14-3    Lithology on Section L112, IMC 2019 14-12
Figure 14-4    Alteration on Section L112, IMC 2019 14-15
Figure 14-5    Alteration on Section 18, IMC 2019 14-16
Figure 14-6    Alteration on Section 29, IMC 2019 14-17
Figure 14-7    Oxidation Zones on Section 29, IMC 2019 14-18
Figure 14-8    Estimation Domains on Section L112, IMC 2019 14-19
Figure 14-9    Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – NE Domain 14-24
Figure 14-10  Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – NE Domain 14-24
Figure 14-11  Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – SW Domain 14-25
Figure 14-12  Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – SW Domain 14-25
Figure 14-13  Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – Indidura 14-26
Figure 14-14  Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – Indidura 14-26
Figure 14-15  NE Domain Gold Variogram – Primary Axis 14-28
Figure 14-16  NE Domain Gold Variogram – Secondary Axis 14-29
Figure 14-17  NE Domain Gold Variogram – Tertiary Axis 14-30
Figure 14-18  SW Domain Gold Variogram – Primary Axis 14-31
Figure 14-19  SW Domain Gold Variogram – Down Hole Variogram 14-32
Figure 14-20  Gold Grades on Section 29, IMC 2019 14-35
Figure 14-21  Gold Grades on Section 18, IMC 2019 14-36
Figure 14-22  Gold Grades on Section L112, IMC 2019 14-37
Figure 14-23  Average Distance to Nearest 3 & 4 Holes – NE Kp & Ki Domains 14-40
Figure 14-24  Average Distance to Nearest 3 & 4 Holes – SW Kp & Ki Domains 14-41
Figure 14-25  Average Distance to Nearest 3 & 4 Holes – Indidura Kp & Ki Domains 14-42
Figure 14-26  Resource Categories on Section 18, IMC 2019 14-43
Figure 14-27  Resource Categories on Section 29, IMC 2019 14-44
Figure 16-1    Slope Angle Recommendations, Piteau 2019 16-3
Figure 16-2    Final Pit, IMC 2019 16-5
Figure 16-3    End of Preproduction, IMC 2019 16-13
Figure 16-4    End of Year 1, IMC 2019 16-14
Figure 16-5    End of Year 2, IMC 2019 16-15
Figure 16-6    End of Year 3, IMC 2019 16-16
Figure 16-7    End of Year 4, IMC 2019 16-17
Figure 16-8    End of Year 5, IMC 2019 16-18
Figure 16-9    End of Year 6, IMC 2019 16-19
Figure 16-10  Year 7 – End of Mining, IMC 2019 16-20
Figure 16-11  Year 7 – End of Waste Storage Capping & Low Grade Reclaim, IMC 2019 16-21

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 13

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 17-1  Process Overall Flowsheet 17-4
Figure 17-2  Project General Arrangement 17-5
Figure 17-3  Average Year Water Balance Diagram 17-19
Figure 17-4  Wet Year Water Balance Diagram 17-20
Figure 17-5  Dry Year Water Balance Diagram 17-21
Figure 17-6  Merrill-Crowe Recovery Plant & Refinery Layout 17-23
Figure 17-7  NaCN Mix & Storage Area Layout 17-29
Figure 20-1  Camino Rojo Project Closure Schedule 20-12
Figure 20-2  Permitting Process Flowsheet 20-24
Figure 20-3  Medical Clinic in San Tiburcio – ERM 2018. 20-30
Figure 20-4  Home in El Berrendo – ERM 2018 20-32
Figure 20-5  Unoccupied Home in San Francisco de los Quijano – ERM 2018. 20-32
Figure 20-6  Town Plaza in San Tiburcio – ERM 2018. 20-33
Figure 20-7  Public Plaza in La Fabrica (part of San Tiburcio) – ERM 2018. 20-33
Figure 22-1  Annual Gold Production 22-8
Figure 22-2  Annual Silver Production 22-8
Figure 22-3  After Tax Sensitivity – IRR 22-15
Figure 22-4  After Tax Sensitivity – NPV @ 5% 22-15
Figure 24-1  Project Development & Implementation Schedule 24-4
Figure 24-2  Groundwater Elevation Contours Camino Rojo Project, Zacatecas 24-7
Figure 24-3  Total Dissolved Solids in Groundwater 24-11
Figure 24-4  Simulated Dewatering Rates from Open Pit 24-14
Figure 24-5  Maximum Extent of 1 Metre Drawdown Contour for Nominal Case 24-15
Figure 24-6  Maximum Extent of 1 Metre Drawdown Contour for Low K Case 24-15

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 14

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

TABLES

 

Table 1-1      Mineral Resource (Inclusive of Mineral Reserve) 1-8
Table 1-2      Mineral Resource – Lead and Zinc 1-8
Table 1-3      Mineral Reserve 1-10
Table 1-4      Capital Cost Summary 1-16
Table 1-5      Operating Cost Summary 1-16
Table 1-6      Economic Analysis Summary 1-20
Table 4-1      Listing of Mining Concessions 4-4
Table 10-1    Summary of Camino Rojo Drilling, 2007-2018 10-1
Table 10-2    Drillholes by Orla Included in Mineral Resource Model Database 10-4
Table 10-3    Non-Resource Drilling Completed by Orla, 2018 and 2019 10-5
Table 13-1    Oxide Column Test Results - SGS Mineral Services 2009 13-4
Table 13-2    Transition Column Test Results - SGS Mineral Services 2009 13-5
Table 13-3    Bottle Roll Test Results CRM 06 Composites - SGS Mineral Services 2009 13-5
Table 13-4    Bottle Roll Test Results CRM 14 Composites - SGS Mineral Services 2009 13-6
Table 13-5    Bottle Roll Test Results CRM 20 Composites - SGS Mineral Services 2009 13-6
Table 13-6    Transition & Sulphide Samples for Flotation Tests - SGS Mineral   Services 2009 13-7
Table 13-7    Head Analysis Gold & Silver – KCA 2010 13-9
Table 13-8    Carbon & Sulphur Summary – KCA 2010 13-9
Table 13-9    Mercury & Copper Summary – KCA 2010 13-10
Table 13-10  Composite Cyanide Shake Tests Results Summary – KCA 2010 13-11
Table 13-11  Column Leach Test Results on Composites – KCA 2010 13-12
Table 13-12  Head Analysis Gold & Silver– KCA 2012 13-14
Table 13-13  Head Analysis Carbon & Sulphur– KCA 2012 13-14
Table 13-14  Head Analysis Mercury & Copper– KCA 2012 13-15
Table 13-15  Bottle Roll Leach Tests Summary, Gold– KCA 2012 13-17
Table 13-16  Bottle Roll Leach Tests Summary, Silver– KCA 2012 13-18
Table 13-17  KCA 2012 Summary of Column Leach Test Results by Material Type 13-20
Table 13-18  Summary of Flotation Composite Feed Grades 13-22
Table 13-19  Lead Flotation Concentrate Grades 13-22
Table 13-20  Zinc Flotation Concentrate Grades 13-22
Table 13-21  Comminution Test Results Summary 13-23
Table 13-22  Comminution Test Results by Alteration Type 13-23
Table 13-23  Description of Received Material– KCA 2014 13-25
Table 13-24  Description of Received Material– KCA 2015 13-26
Table 13-25  Head Analyses, Gold & Silver– KCA 2015 13-27
Table 13-26  Head Analyses Carbon & Sulphur– KCA 2015 13-27
Table 13-27  Head Analyses Mercury & Copper– KCA 2015 13-28

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 15

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-28  KCA 2015 Column Leach Test Results by Lithology 13-32
Table 13-29  Description of Received Material – KCA 2019 13-35
Table 13-30  Composite Generation Information – KCA 2019 13-36
Table 13-31  Head Analyses Gold & Silver – KCA 2019 13-37
Table 13-32  Head Analyses Carbon & Sulphur – KCA 2019 13-37
Table 13-33  Head Analyses Mercury & Copper – KCA 2019 13-38
Table 13-34  Head Analyses Lead & Zinc – KCA 2019 13-38
Table 13-35  Head Analyses Multi-Element Analysis – KCA 2019 13-39
Table 13-36  Head Analyses Whole Rock Analysis – KCA 2019 13-40
Table 13-37  Phisical Characterization Test Work Summary – KCA 2019 13-41
Table 13-38  Bottle Roll Leach Test Summary, Gold – KCA 2019 13-41
Table 13-39  Bottle Roll Leach Test Summary, Silver – KCA 2019 13-42
Table 13-40  Column Leach Tests Results Summary, Gold – KCA 2019 13-44
Table 13-41  Column Leach Tests Results Summary, Silver – KCA 2019 13-45
Table 13-42  Diagnostic Leach Test Summary – KCA 2019 13-47
Table 13-43  Estimated Recoveries by Material Type for P80 28mm Crush Size 13-52
Table 13-44  Projected Field Cyanide Consumptions by Material Type 13-53
Table 13-45  Projected Field Lime Consumptions by Material Type 13-54
Table 13-46  Distribution of Metals to Various Sulphide Products 13-58
Table 14-1    Mineral Resource 14-2
Table 14-2    Mineral Resource – Lead and Zinc 14-3
Table 14-3    Economic Parameters for Mineral Resource Estimate 14-5
Table 14-4    Treatment Costs for Lead and Zinc Concentrates 14-6
Table 14-5    Camino Rojo Model Rock Types (lith) 14-10
Table 14-6    Camino Rojo Alteration Types (alt) 14-13
Table 14-7    Camino Rojo Oxide-Sulphide Model (oxide) 14-13
Table 14-8    Camino Rojo Estimation Domains (domain) 14-14
Table 14-9    Cap Grades and Number of Assays Capped 14-21
Table 14-10  Summary Statistics of Assays 14-22
Table 14-11  Summary Statistics of 5m Composites 14-23
Table 14-12  Specific Gravity and Bulk Density 14-45
Table 14-13  Reconciliation of 2018 versus 2019 Mineral Resource - Leach Material 14-48
Table 14-14  Reconciliation of 2018 versus 2019 Mineral Resource - Mill Material 14-48
Table 14-15  Reconciliation of 2018 versus 2019 Mineral Resource - Leach &    Mill Material 14-49
Table 15-1    Mineral Reserve 15-3
Table 15-2    Economic Parameters for Mine Design 15-6
Table 16-1    Mine Production Schedule - 6,570 KTPY 16-8
Table 16-2    Proposed Plant Production Schedule - 6,570 KTPY 16-9
Table 16-3    Proposed Plant Production Schedule by Material Type - 6,570 KTPY 16-10

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 16

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 16-4    Mine Waste by Material Type 16-11
Table 16-5    Mine Major Equipment Fleet Requirement 16-22
Table 17-1    Processing Design Criteria Summary 17-2
Table 17-2    Heap Leach Design Parameters 17-11
Table 17-3    Phase 1 Process Pond Storage Requirements 17-15
Table 17-4    Phase 2 Process Pond Storage Requirements 17-15
Table 17-5    Average Monthly Precipitation – San Tiburcio Weather Station 17-16
Table 17-6    24-h Storm Event Estimations – NewFields 17-17
Table 17-7    Average Monthly Evaporation Data – Conception del Oro Weather Station 17-17
Table 17-8    Average Make-up Water Requirements 17-18
Table 17-9    Projected Annual Reagents and Consumables 17-27
Table 18-1    Camp Capacity 18-4
Table 18-2    Power Demand 18-9
Table 20-1    Summary of Camino Rojo Closure Costs 20-20
Table 20-2    Permits Required for Mine Construction 20-22
Table 20-3    Permits Required for Mine Operation and Closure 20-23
Table 20-4    Populations of Communities in Area of Influence of Project 20-27
Table 20-5    Marginalization by Community 20-34
Table 21-1    Capital Cost Summary 21-1
Table 21-2    LOM Operating Cost Summary 21-1
Table 21-3    Summary of Pre-Production Capital Costs by Area 21-3
Table 21-4    LOM Mining Capital Costs 21-4
Table 21-5    Owner Mining Equipment Capital Costs 21-6
Table 21-6    Mine Development Capital Costs 21-6
Table 21-7    Summary of Process & Infrastructure Pre-Production Capital Costs   by Discipline 21-8
Table 21-8    Process Mobile Equipment 21-12
Table 21-9    Process & Infrastructure Contingency 21-13
Table 21-10  Construction Indirect Costs 21-14
Table 21-11  Other Owner’s Construction Costs 21-15
Table 21-12  Initial Fills 21-16
Table 21-13  Contract Mining Cost Summary 21-19
Table 21-14  Contract Mining Costs Based on Unit Rates 21-22
Table 21-15  Contract Blasting Costs Based on Unit Rates 21-22
Table 21-16  Owner Mine Personnel & Technical Services 21-23
Table 21-17  Pit Wall Support Costs 21-24
Table 21-18  Wall Control Drilling Costs 21-24
Table 21-19  Average Process, Support & G&A Operating Cost 21-25
Table 21-20  Personnel & Staffing Summary 21-27
Table 21-21  Support Equipment Operating Costs 21-30

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 17

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-22  Fixed G&A Expenses 21-31
Table 21-23  G&A Expenses by Year 21-32
Table 21-24  Reclamation and Closure Cost Summary 21-33
Table 22-1    Key Economic Parameters 22-2
Table 22-2    Economic Analysis Summary 22-3
Table 22-3    Capital Expenditures Summary 22-7
Table 22-4    LOM Operating Costs 22-9
Table 22-5    Depreciation and Pre-Production Tax Pools 22-11
Table 22-6    Cashflow Model Summary 22-12
Table 22-7    After-Tax Sensitivity Analysis Results 22-14
Table 24-1    Summary of Groundwater Quality Analyses from On-Site (COPE) Wells 24-9

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

Contents

Page 18

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

1.0 SUMMARY

 

1.1 Introduction and Overview

 

The Camino Rojo property, located in Zacatecas State, Mexico, is 100% owned by Orla Mining Ltd. (Orla) through its Mexican subsidiary Minera Camino Rojo S.A. de C.V. (MCR). At the request of Orla, this Report was prepared by Kappes, Cassiday and Associates (KCA), Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. (IMC), Resource Geosciences Incorporated (RGI) and Barranca Group, LLC (Barranca) with input from other consultant groups.

 

This Technical Report is a summary of a Feasibility Study (FS) on the Camino Rojo Project and has been prepared in accordance with disclosure and reporting requirements set forth in the Canadian Securities Administrators’ current “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” under the provisions of National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101), Companion Policy 43-101 CP and Form 43-101F1 and supersedes a Technical Report prepared by KCA dated 19 June 2018 and amended 11 March 2019, “Preliminary Economic Assessment - Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”.

 

The Camino Rojo Project considers open pit mining of approximately 44 million tonnes of ore with an estimated grade of 0.73 grams per tonne (g/t) gold and 14.2 g/t silver. Ore from the pit will be crushed to 80% passing 28mm, conveyor stacked onto a heap leach pad and leached using a low concentration sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant where gold and silver will be precipitated from deaerated pregnant solution with ultra-fine zinc. The resulting precious metal sludge will be filtered and dried in a mercury retort, and then smelted to produce the final doré product.

 

The average processing throughput for the Camino Rojo Project is 18,000 tonnes of ore per day (tpd). The Project will be developed in two stages with expansion of the leach pad and addition of conveying equipment occurring in Year 2 of operation. Pit dewatering equipment including pumps and evaporators will be required in Year 4 of operation. The scope of the FS includes a mine production schedule, as well as costing for all process components and infrastructure required for the operation. This report is based on the oxide and transitional portion of the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource on the Property.

 

1.2 Property Description and Ownership

 

The Camino Rojo property is located in the Municipality of Mazapil, State of Zacatecas, near the village of San Tiburcio. The property lies 190 kilometres (km) NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, Zacatecas, and 54km S-SE of Newmont Goldcorp Corporation’s (Newmont) Peñasquito Mine. The Project area is centred at approximately 244150E 2675900N UTM NAD27 Zone 14N.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 1.0 Summary
June, 2019 Page 1-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The property mineral rights are held by Orla’s Mexican subsidiary MCR in 8 mining concessions covering approximately 2,059 km2. Currently, ongoing exploration programs are identifying the most prospective areas surrounding the Camino Rojo deposit, and Orla, through its Mexican subsidiary MCR, plans to reduce its mineral concession holdings to 1,631 km2 by relinquishing mineral rights to the least prospective ground. Surface rights are held by the Ejido San Tiburcio, a communal agrarian cooperative. Exploration has been carried out under the authority of agreements between the project operators and the Ejido San Tiburcio. There is a temporary occupation with right to expropriate agreement in place with the Ejido San Tiburcio that covers all the area of the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimate as well as the area of potential development described in this report. MCR has water rights for sufficient volumes of water to develop the Project.

 

1.3 Geology & Mineralization

 

The Camino Rojo deposit comprises intrusive related, clastic sedimentary strata hosted, polymetallic gold, silver, arsenic, zinc and lead mineralization.

 

Mineralization is hosted by Cretaceous submarine sedimentary strata, dominantly clastic. The most important host is the Caracol Formation, a rhythmically interbedded sequence of weakly calcareous turbiditic sandstones, siltstones and shales. The underlying Indidura Formation, comprised of regularly bedded reduced siltstones and shales, and the Cuesta del Cura limestone, now recrystallized to white fine-grained marble, host a minor amount of sulphide mineralization, but are inconsequential hosts of oxide mineralization. The gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit is situated above, and extends down into, a zone of feldspathic hornfels developed in the sedimentary strata, and variably mineralized dacitic dikes. The mineralized zones correspond to zones of sheeted sulphidic veins and veinlet networks, creating a bulk-mineable style of gold mineralization. Skarn mineralization has been encountered in the deeper portions of the system. The observed geologic and geochemical characteristics of the gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit at Camino Rojo are consistent with those of a distal oxidized gold skarn deposit. The metal suite and style of mineralization at Camino Rojo are similar to the intrusion-related deposits in the Caracol Formation and underlying carbonate rocks adjacent to the diatremes at the Peñasquito mine.

 

For purposes of this Report, only the economic potential of the oxide and partially oxidized transitional mineralization amenable to gold and silver recovery via standard cyanide heap leach processing, was evaluated.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 1.0 Summary
June, 2019 Page 1-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

1.4 Exploration and Drilling

 

The Camino Rojo deposit was discovered in mid-2007 and was originally entirely concealed beneath post-mineral cover in a broad, low relief alluvial valley adjacent to the western flank of the Sierra Madre Oriental. Mineralized road ballast placed on a dirt road near San Tiburcio, Zacatecas, was traced to its source by geologists Perry Durning and Bud Hillemeyer from La Cuesta International, working under contract to Canplats Resources Corporation (Canplats). A shallow pit excavated through a thin veneer of alluvium, located adjacent to a stock pond (represa) was the discovery exposure of the deposit. Canplats began concurrent programs of surface geophysics and reverse-circulation (RC) drilling in late 2007, which continued into 2008.

 

The initial drilling was focused on a 450 x 600 metre gold-in-rock geochemical anomaly named the Represa zone. Core drilling began in 2008. The geophysical survey defined two principal areas of high chargeability: one centred on the Represa zone and another 1 km to the west named the Don Julio zone. The elevated chargeability zones were interpreted as large volumes of sulphide mineralized rocks. Drilling by Canplats, and later drilling by Goldcorp Inc. (Goldcorp), confirmed the presence of extensive sulphide mineralization at depth in the Represa zone, and much lower quantities of sulphide minerals at Don Julio, which is an extension of the Represa zone mineralization.

 

By August of 2008, Canplats drilled a total of 92 RC, and 30 diamond-core holes, for a total of 23,988 and 16,044 metres respectively, mainly focused in the Represa zone.

 

Canplats was acquired by Goldcorp in early 2010. Validation, infill, condemnation, and expansion drilling began in January 2011. By the end of 2015, a total of 279,788 metres of new core drilling in 415 drillholes and 20,569 metres of new RC drilling in 96 drillholes was completed in the Represa and Don Julio zones and their immediate surroundings. An additional 31,286 metres of shallow rotary air blast (RAB)-style, RC drilling in 306 drillholes was completed, with most of the RAB drilling testing other exploration targets within the concession. Airborne gravity, magnetic and TEM surveys were also carried out. As of the end of 2015 a total of 295,832 metres in 445 diamond core holes, 44,557 metres in 188 RC drillholes, and 31,286 metres of RAB drilling had been completed.

 

Orla acquired the property from Goldcorp in 2017 and through the effective date of this report, Orla has completed: 2,228.5 metres of additional drilling in 14 diamond core holes for metallurgical sampling; 5,340.5 metres of drilling in 16 reverse circulation holes testing for water; 803.1 metres of RC holes as resource infill drillholes; 1,767.8 metres of drilling in 7 RC holes as condemnation holes; 1,261.0 metres of drilling in 6 deep diamond core holes as condemnation and infrastructure geotechnical holes; 323.4 metres of drilling in 19 shallow diamond core holes as geotechnical tests of the substrate in the areas of proposed mine infrastructure; 726.0 metres of drilling in diamond core holes as pit slope stability geotechnical holes, 56 metres of drilling in 5 diamond core holes evaluating clay sources for pond liner material; and 197.4 metres of RC drilling to construct 3 monitoring wells. Orla has not yet conducted any drilling to explore for new mineralized zones.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 1.0 Summary
June, 2019 Page 1-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

1.5 Metallurgical Test Work

 

Historical metallurgical test work programs on the Camino Rojo property were commissioned by the prior operators of the Project between 2010 and 2015. A confirmatory metallurgical test program was commissioned by Orla in 2018 to confirm the results and conclusions from the previous campaigns. In total, 107 column leach tests (85 on representative samples for the material types and pit area) and 164 bottle roll tests have been completed to date on the Camino Rojo ore body as well as physical characterization and preliminary flotation test work.

 

Based on the metallurgical tests completed on the deposit, key design parameters for the Project include:

 

· Crush size of 100% passing 38mm (P80 28mm).
· Estimated gold recoveries (including 2% field deduction) of:
o 70% for Kp Oxide;
o 56% for Ki Oxide;
o 60% for Trans-Hi; and
o 40% for Trans-Lo.
· Estimated silver recoveries (including 3% field deduction) of:
o 11% for Kp Oxide;
o 15% for Ki Oxide;
o 27% for Trans-Hi and
o 34% for Trans-Lo.
· Design leach cycle of 80 days.
· Agglomeration with cement not required for permeability or stability.
· Average cyanide consumption of 0.35 kilograms per tonne (kg/t) ore.
· Average lime consumption of 1.25 kg/t ore.

 

The key design parameters are based on a substantial number of metallurgical tests including 85 column leach tests on samples representative of domains in the current deposit model. These 85 representative samples from documented drillholes with good spatial distribution in the proposed pit include 41 columns tests on Kp Oxide material, 7 column tests on Ki Oxide material, 16 column tests on Trans-Hi material and 21 column tests on Trans-Lo material. The 22 non-representative columns were excluded based on the following criteria:

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 1.0 Summary
June, 2019 Page 1-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

· Columns on Trans-S or sulphide material that were not considered in the Mineral Reserve.
· Mix of Tran-S or other material types.
· Samples taken from outside of the proposed pit area.

 

An additional 54 bottle roll leach tests with direct correlations with the column tests have been included as part of the evaluation to support these results and conclusions.

 

In general, the Camino Rojo deposit shows variability in gold and silver recoveries based on material type and geological domain with preg-robbing organic carbon being the only significant deleterious element identified, which is primarily associated with the transition material at depth along the outer edges of the deposit. Recoveries for the oxide material are good and will yield acceptable results using conventional heap leaching methods with cyanide. Recoveries for the transition material are lower compared with the oxide material for conventional leaching with some areas of transition showing reasonably high recoveries. Reagent consumptions for all material types are reasonably low.

 

Preg robbing, a phenomenon where gold and gold-cyanide complexes are preferentially absorbed by carbonaceous, and to a lesser extent, other material within the orebody; presents a low risk to the overall Project. A significant investigation by Orla into the preg robbing material indicates that potentially preg robbing material represents a small percentage of the total material to be processed and will not be encountered until later in the Project life and can be mitigated by proper ore control.

 

1.6 Mineral Resource Estimate

 

Table 1-1 presents the gold and silver Mineral Resource estimation for the Camino Rojo property. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 353.4 million tonnes at 0.83 g/t gold and 8.8 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 9.46 million ounces gold and 100.4 million ounces of silver for the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 60.9 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold and 7.4 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 1.70 million ounces of gold and 14.5 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource.

 

The gold and silver Mineral Resource includes material amenable to heap leach recovery methods (leach material) and material amenable to mill and flotation concentration methods (mill material). For the leach material, Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 94.6 million tonnes at 0.71 g/t gold and 12.7 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 2.16 million ounces gold and 38.8 million ounces of silver for the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 4.4 million tonnes at 0.86 g/t gold and 5.8 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 119,800 ounces of gold and 805,000 ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource amenable to heap leach methods. The resources amenable to heap leach methods are oxide dominant and are the emphasis of the Feasibility Study.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 1.0 Summary
June, 2019 Page 1-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

For the gold and silver resource in mill material, the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 258.8 million tonnes at 0.88 g/t gold and 7.4 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 7.30 million ounces gold and 61.6 million ounces of silver for the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 56.6 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold, 7.5 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 1.58 million ounces of gold and 13.7 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource in mill material.

 

Table 1-2 presents the lead and zinc Mineral Resources for the Camino Rojo Project. The lead and zinc Mineral Resources are in sulphide dominant material and are recovered along with the gold and silver in the mill material. Lead and zinc Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 258.8 million tonnes at 0.07% lead and 0.26% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 413.6 million pounds of lead, and 1.50 billion pounds of zinc for the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 56.6 million tonnes at 0.05% lead and 0.23% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 63.1 million pounds of lead and 290.4 million pounds of zinc for the Inferred Mineral Resource category.

 

The Mineral Resources from the leach material are reported inclusive of those Mineral Resources that were converted to Mineral Reserves presented in Section 1.7. The Mineral Resources from the mill material were excluded from the mine design in the Feasibility Study.

 

The Mineral Resources are based on a block model developed by IMC during January and February 2019. This updated model incorporated the 2018 Orla drilling and updated geologic models.

 

The Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resources reported herein are constrained within a floating cone pit shell to demonstrate “reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction” to meet the definition of Mineral Resources in NI 43-101.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 1.0 Summary
June, 2019 Page 1-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Mineral Resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by the owner of the adjacent property (Adjacent Owner), that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles, and an assumption that an agreement will be negotiated to allow a push-back of the pit onto the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles to gain access to the mineral resources on Orla’s mineral properties. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo property that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the Mineral Resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner. The Mineral Resource estimate has been prepared based on the Qualified Person’s reasoned judgment, in accordance with Canadian Institute of Mining, metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Best Practices Guidelines and his professional standards of competence, that there is a reasonable expectation that all necessary permits, agreements and approvals will be obtained and maintained, including an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to allow mining of waste material on its mineral concessions. In particular, when determining the prospects for eventual economic extraction, consideration was given to industry practice, including the past practices of the Adjacent Owner in entering similar agreements on commercially reasonable terms, and a timeframe of 10-15 years.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement would affect the development of a significant portion of the Mineral Resources of the Camino Rojo property that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. There can be no assurance that Orla will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to Orla or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 1.0 Summary
June, 2019 Page 1-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 1-1
Mineral Resource (Inclusive of Mineral Reserve)

      NSR Cut-off   Gold Silver Gold Silver
Resource Type ($/t) Kt (g/t) (g/t) (koz) (koz)
Leach Resource:            
  Measured Mineral Resource 4.73 19,391 0.77 14.9 482.3 9,305
  Indicated Mineral Resource 4.73 75,249 0.70 12.2 1,680.7 29,471
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 4.73 94,640 0.71 12.7 2,163.0 38,776
  Inferred Mineral Resource 4.73 4,355 0.86 5.8 119.8 805
                 
Mill Resource:            
  Measured Mineral Resource 13.71 3,358 0.69 9.2 74.2 997
  Indicated Mineral Resource 13.71 255,445 0.88 7.4 7,221.4 60,606
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 13.71 258,803 0.88 7.4 7,295.6 61,603
  Inferred Mineral Resource 13.71 56,564 0.87 7.5 1,576.9 13,713
                 
Total Mineral Resource            
  Measured Mineral Resource   22,749 0.76 14.1 556.5 10,302
  Indicated Mineral Resource   330,694 0.84 8.5 8,902.1 90,078
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource   353,443 0.83 8.8 9,458.6 100,379
  Inferred Mineral Resource   60,919 0.87 7.4 1,696.7 14,518
                 

 

Table 1-2
Mineral Resource – Lead and Zinc

    NSR Cut off   NSR Lead Zinc Lead Zinc
Resource Type ($/t) Kt ($/t) (%) (%) (Mlb) (Mlb)
Mill Resource:              
  Measured Mineral Resource 13.71 3,358 35.04 0.13 0.38 9.3 28.2
  Indicated Mineral Resource 13.71 255,445 39.33 0.07 0.26 404.3 1,468.7
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 13.71 258,803 39.27 0.07 0.26 413.6 1,496.8
  Inferred Mineral Resource 13.71 56,564 38.4 0.05 0.23 63.1 290.4
                 

 

Notes:

1. The Mineral Resource has an effective date of June 7, 2019 and the estimate was prepared using the CIM Definition Standards (May 10, 2014).

2. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and therefore numbers may not appear to add precisely.

3. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

4. Mineral Resources for leach material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold and $20/oz silver.

5. Mineral Resources for mill material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold, $20/oz silver, $1.05/lb lead, and $1.20/lb zinc.

6. Mineral Resources are based on NSR cut-off of $4.73/t for leach material and $13.71/t for mill material.

7. NSR value for leach material is as follows:

Kp Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 30.77 x gold (g/t) + 0.068 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 70% and silver recovery of 11%

Ki Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 24.61 x gold (g/t) + 0.092 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 56% and silver recovery of 15%

Tran-Hi: NSR ($/t) = 26.37 x gold (g/t) + 0.166 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 60% and silver recovery of 27%

Tran-Lo: NSR ($/t) = 17.58 x gold (g/t) + 0.209 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 40% and silver recovery of 34%

8. NSR value for mill material is 36.75 x gold (g/t) + 0.429 x silver (g/t) + 10.75 x lead (%) + 11.77 x zinc (%), based on recoveries of 86% gold, 76% silver, 60% lead, and 64% zinc.

9. Table 14-3 accompanies this Mineral Resource statement and shows all relevant parameters.

10. Mineral Resources are constrained within a conceptual pit shell in order to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction, to meet the definition of Mineral Resource in NI 43-101; mineralization lying outside of the pit shell is not reported as a Mineral Resource.

11. The Mineral Resource estimate requires the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to extend onto land held by the Adjacent Owner. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo property that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner.

12. The Mineral Resources in the leach material is inclusive of those Mineral Resources that were converted to Mineral Reserves.

 

1.7 Mineral Reserve Estimate

 

Table 1-3 presents the Mineral Reserve estimation for the Camino Rojo Project. The Proven and Probable Mineral Reserve amounts to 44.0 million tonnes at 0.73 g/t Au and 14.2 g/t Ag for 1.03 million contained gold ounces and 20.1 million contained silver ounces. Direct feed material in the Mineral Reserve is material that will be processed the same year it is mined. The low-grade stockpile material will be processed after the open pit is completed. The effective date of this Mineral Reserve estimation is 24 June 2019.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 1.0 Summary
June, 2019 Page 1-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The Mineral Reserve estimation is based on an open pit mine plan and mine production schedule developed by IMC. Processing is based on crushing and heap leaching to recover gold and silver. Table 1-3 shows the parameters used for economic and cut-off calculations. The Mineral Reserve is based on a gold price of US$1250 per ounce and a silver price of US$17.00 per ounce. Measured Mineral Resource in the mine production schedule was converted to proven Mineral Reserve and indicated Mineral Resource in the schedule was converted to probable Mineral Reserve.

 

The Mineral Reserves are classified in accordance with the “CIM Definition Standards – For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” adopted by the CIM Council (as amended, the “CIM Definition Standards”) in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101. Mineral Reserve estimates reflect the reasonable expectation that all necessary permits and approvals will be obtained and maintained.

 

IMC does not believe that there are significant risks to the Mineral Reserve estimate based on metallurgical or infrastructure factors. There has been a significant amount of metallurgical testing and the infrastructure requirements are relatively straightforward compared to many operations. However, recoveries lower than forecast would result is loss of revenue for the project. There has also been some potential preg-robbing material identified in the deposit, as discussed in Section 13.5 and 25.3.2, but this does not appear to represent a significant risk.

 

There is risk to the Mineral Reserve based on mining factors. As discussed in Section 16.2 and 25.3.1, the slope angle assumptions are based on careful application of wall control blasting, and the north and west wall slope angles are also based on significant mechanical support. Failure of these systems to perform as expected would result in less ore available for the process plant and potentially a shorter project life. Also, slope stability issues on the north wall of the pit could be difficult to mitigate due to lack of access to the ground north of the pit.

 

Other risks to the Mineral Reserve are related to economic parameters such as prices lower than forecast or costs higher than the current estimates. The impact of these is modeled in the sensitivity study with the economic analysis in Section 22.10.

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Mineral Reserve estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla as is all the proposed development and mining and processing activities.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 1.0 Summary
June, 2019 Page 1-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 1-3
Mineral Reserve

 

                Cont. Cont.
          NSR Gold Silver Gold Silver
Reserve Class Ktonnes ($/t) (g/t) (g/t) (koz) (koz)
Proven Mineral Reserve              
  Direct Feed   13,331 22.87 0.84 15.6 358.8 6,698
  Low Grade Stockpile   1,264 7.19 0.27 10.0 10.9 406
  Total Proven Mineral Reserve 14,595 21.51 0.79 15.1 369.7 7,104
Probable Mineral Reserve            
  Direct Feed   25,939 20.27 0.76 14.4 629.8 12,029
  Low Grade Stockpile   3,485 7.05 0.28 8.6 31.3 962
  Total Probable Mineral Reserve 29,424 18.70 0.70 13.7 661.1 12,991
Probable/Probable Mineral Reserve            
  Direct Feed   39,270 21.15 0.78 14.8 988.6 18,726
  Low Grade Stockpile   4,749 7.09 0.28 9.0 42.3 1,368
  Total Probable/Probable Reserve 44,019 19.63 0.73 14.2 1,030.9 20,095

 

Notes:

1. The Mineral Reserve estimate has an effective date of June 24, 2019 and was prepared using the CIM Definition Standards (10 May 2014).

2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding.

3. Mineral Reserves are based on prices of $1250/oz gold and $17/oz silver.

4. Mineral Reserves are based on NSR cut-offs that vary by time period to balance mine and plant production capacities (see Section 16). They range from a low of $4.73/t to a high of $9.00/t.

5. NSR value for leach material is as follows:

Kp Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 27.46 x gold (g/t) + 0.057 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 70% and silver recovery of 11%

Ki Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 21.97 x gold (g/t) + 0.078 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 56% and silver recovery of 15%

Tran-Hi: NSR ($/t) = 23.54 x gold (g/t) + 0.140 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 60% and silver recovery of 27%

Tran-Lo: NSR ($/t) = 15.69 x gold (g/t) + 0.177 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 40% and silver recovery of 34%

6. Table 15-2 accompanies this Mineral Reserve estimate and shows all relevant parameters

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 1.0 Summary
June, 2019 Page 1-10

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

1.8 Mining Methods

 

The Camino Rojo Feasibility Study is based on a conventional open pit mine. Mine operations will consist of drilling medium diameter blast holes (approximately 17cm), blasting with explosive emulsions or ANFO (ammonium nitrate/fuel oil) depending on water conditions, and loading into large off-road trucks with hydraulic shovels and wheel loaders. Ore will be delivered to the primary crusher and waste to the waste storage facility southeast of the pit. There will also be a low-grade stockpile facility to store marginal ore for processing at the end of commercial pit operations. There will be a fleet of track dozers, rubber-tired dozers, motor graders and water trucks to maintain the working areas of the pit, waste storage areas, and haul roads.

 

A mine plan was developed to supply ore to a conventional crushing and heap leach facility with the capacity to process 18,000 tpd (6,570 ktpy). The mine is scheduled to operate two 10-hour shifts per day for 365 days per year.

 

The mine plan is constrained by the Adjacent Owner concession boundary on the north side of the pit, i.e. the FS is based on the assumption that no mining activities, including waste stripping, would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in this technical report.

 

Eventually, mining will be conducted below the water table, probably during Year 4 of commercial operation. Estimates of pit dewatering requirements have been prepared for cost estimation purposes, but additional hydrogeological studies will be required to better estimate the requirements.

 

1.9 Recovery Methods

 

Test work results developed by KCA and others have indicated that part of the Camino Rojo Mineral Resource is amenable to heap leaching for the recovery of gold and silver. Based on a Mineral Reserve of 44.0 million tonnes and established processing rate of 18,000 tonnes per day of ore, the Project has an estimated mine life of approximately 6.8 years.

 

Ore will be mined using standard open pit mining methods and delivered to the crushing circuit using haul trucks which will direct-dump into a dump hopper; front-end loaders will feed material to the dump hopper as needed from a run of mine (ROM) stockpile located near the primary crusher. Ore will be crushed to a final product size of 80% passing 28mm (100% passing 38mm) using a two-stage closed crushing circuit. The crushing circuit will operate 7 days/week, 24 hours/day with an overall estimated availability of 75%.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The crushed product will be stockpiled using a fixed stacker, reclaimed by belt feeders to a reclaim conveyor, and conveyed to the heap stacking system by an overland conveyor system. Pebble lime will be added to the reclaim conveyor belt for pH control; agglomeration with cement is not needed.

 

Stacked ore will be leached using a drip irrigation system for solution application; sprinkler irrigation will be used beginning in Year 4 of operations to increase evaporation rates and reduce water treatment requirements from pit dewatering. After percolating through the ore, the gold and silver bearing pregnant leach solution will drain by gravity to a pregnant solution pond where it will be collected and pumped to a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant. Pregnant solution will be pumped through clarification filter presses to remove any suspended solids before being deaerated in a vacuum tower to remove oxygen. Ultra-fine zinc dust will be added to the deaerated pregnant solution to precipitate gold and silver values, which will be collected by precipitate filter presses. Barren leach solution leaving the precipitate filter presses will flow to a barren solution tank and will then be pumped to the heap for further leaching. High strength cyanide solution will be injected into the barren solution to maintain the cyanide concentration in the leach solutions at the desired levels.

 

The precipitate from the Merrill-Crowe recovery plant will be processed in the refinery. Precipitate will be treated by an electric mercury retort with a fume collection system for drying and removal of mercury before being mixed with fluxes and smelted using an induction smelting furnace to produce the final doré product.

 

An event pond is included to collect contact solution from storm events. Solution collected will be returned to the process as soon as practical. Evaporators will be installed in the event pond beginning in Year 3 of operation to remove excess water generated by pit dewatering.

 

1.10 Infrastructure

 

Existing infrastructure for the Camino Rojo Project includes a 20-man exploration camp and dirt and gravel roads throughout the Project site. Internet and limited cellular communications are currently available, though these systems will need to be expanded for operations.

 

Access to the Project site is by the paved four lane Mexican Highway 54 and Route 62, a secondary paved highway that passes through San Tiburcio. This is approximately 260 km southwest of Monterrey and 190 km northeast of Zacatecas. A private road will enter into the mine property approximately 250 metres northeast of the intersection between highway 54 and 62. This road will provide access to the camps, offices, mine, process plant and other Project facilities. Site access roads will be constructed during pre-production and will include approximately 24 km of dirt and gravel roads.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-12

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The onsite operations camp will be arranged to lodge up to 408 people and will be under maximum occupancy during the construction phase (multiple bunks in rooms that will be single rooms during operations).

 

Power supply to the Camino Rojo Project will initially be generated on site using two each 2500 ekW diesel generator units operating, with an additional unit on standby, as well as by the existing power line which services the surrounding area. Power will be generated at 4160 V, 3 phase, 60 Hz and stepped up to 13.8 kV by a transformer for site distribution. The generator system has been sized to meet both the average power demand of 4.8 MW as well as the peak estimated demand of 6 MW based on detailed electrical loads with estimated utilization and demand factors. The existing power line has a reported 1 MW of capacity which will be used to supply power to dedicated loads (man camp, site buildings, water supply). The existing power line will be stepped down from 34.5 kV to 13.8 kV.

 

It is assumed that in Year 2 of operations, power supply will be available by connecting to the national grid and power generation at site will no longer be needed. Overhead power lines will connect 34.5 kV, three phase and 60 Hz power system, pending Centro Nacional de Control de Energía (CENACE) approval, to a metering and switching substation. This main substation will be located at approximately NAD27 245609E, 2674826N. Power from the main substation will be stepped down to 13.8 kV and connected to the existing switch gear for site distribution. The temporary generators and associated fuel tanks will be removed once line power is available.

 

Total Project water supply will be sourced from production wells located within the property boundary. Process make-up water will also be supplied during pit dewatering activities starting in about Year 4. Total water consumption for the Project will average 24 liters per second (L/s) with a peak water demand of 33 L/s.

 

Project buildings will primarily be prefabricated steel buildings or concrete masonry unit buildings and include an administration building, mine truck shop, warehouse, laboratory, guard house, clinic, refinery and motor control centres (MCC).

 

1.11 Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by the Federal agency of the Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources), known by its acronym SEMARNAT, which has authority over the 2 principal Federal permits:

 

i. A Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement), known by its acronym as an MIA accompanied by an Estudio de Riesgo (Risk Study, hereafter referred to as ER); and
     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-13

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

ii. A Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Use Change) permit, known by its acronym as a CUS, supported by an Estudio Tecnico Justificativo (Technical Justification Study, known by its acronym ETJ).

 

Thus far exploration work at Camino Rojo has been conducted under the auspices of two separate MIA permits and corresponding CUS permits. These permits allow for extensive exploration drilling but are not sufficient for mine construction or operation.

 

Baseline environmental studies required for permitting were commissioned by Orla on April 2018 and were completed in May 2019 by independent consultants. The Project area includes five flora species with legally protected status and nine fauna species that are listed as threatened or protected. In accordance with Federal laws, 100% of the protected plants will be rescued and transplanted prior to construction and qualified biologists will survey the areas to be disturbed to identify nesting areas, dens and lairs of animals present. Any animals not naturally prone to leave the area that are found will be relocated to suitable habitats elsewhere in the property area. Current and ongoing environmental investigations are still in progress. Submission of MIA and CUS permitting documents to SEMARNAT is anticipated in the 3rd Quarter 2019.

 

The Project is not located in an area with any special Federal environmental protection designation and no factors have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required Federal and State environmental permits. The legislated timelines for review of properly prepared MIA and Change of Land Use applications and mine operating permits for a project that does not affect Federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves are 120 calendar days and 105 working days, respectively, which can be completed concurrently.

 

The Peñasquito mine, a large scale, open pit mine, presently operated by Newmont, is in the same Municipality and the mine encountered no impediments to receipt of needed permits. Should construction and operation permits be solicited for the Camino Rojo Project, no obstacles to obtaining them are anticipated provided that Orla design and mitigation criteria meet all applicable standards.

 

In April 2018, Orla commissioned Environmental Resources Management (ERM), a global provider of environmental, health, safety, risk, social consulting and sustainability related services group to conduct an independent assessment of social and community impacts of the development of the Camino Rojo Project, and to provide guidance on actions and policies needed to ensure that Orla obtains and maintains social license to operate. The study was completed in May 2019 (ERM, 2019) and salient results are being incorporated into the project development and permitting plans. Key points are summarized as follows:

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-14

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Principal concerns of affected stakeholders in surrounding communities are:

 

i. Employment of community members
ii. Community benefits from improved public services and investment in community development
iii. Environmental contamination
iv. Increased community population and strain on public services
v. Water shortages

 

Principal concerns of Ejido members whose land is affected are:

 

i.     Just economic compensation

ii.    Assistance in obtaining title to informally owned parcels

 

Principal concerns of local and State government authorities are:

 

i.     Generation of employment

ii.    Improvement of local infrastructure

iii.   Service contracts to local businesses

iv.   Environmental contamination

 

ERM identified the principal social and community impacts of the Project and opined that the Project does not put at risk the social environment of the nearby communities because the impacts can be mitigated or made positive with the implementation of a Social Management System (SMS). ERM has designed this SMS based on International Association of Impact Assessment best practices.

 

1.12 Capital and Operating Costs

 

Capital and operating costs for the process and general and administration components of the Camino Rojo Project were estimated by KCA. Costs for the mining components were provided by IMC. The estimated costs are considered to have an accuracy of +/-15%.

 

The total Life of Mine (LOM) capital cost for the Project is US$153.7 million, including US$10.1 million in working capital and not including reclamation and closure costs which have been estimated at US$19.8 million, IVA (value added tax) or other taxes; all IVA is applied to all costs at 16% and is assumed to be fully refundable. Table 1-4 presents the capital requirements for the Camino Rojo Project. A total contingency of US$18.6 million or 12% of the total LOM capital costs is included in this summary.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-15

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 1-4


Capital Cost Summary

 

Description Cost (US$)
Pre-Production Capital $ 123,114,000
Working Capital & Initial Fills $ 10,187,000
Sustaining Capital – Mine & Process $ 20,424,000
Total excluding IVA $ 153,725,000

 

A majority of the costs presented have been estimated primarily by KCA with input from IMC on owner mining and mining contractor mobilization costs. Material take-offs for earthworks, concrete and major piping have been estimated by KCA. All equipment and material requirements are based on design information described in this report. Capital costs have been made primarily using budgetary supplier quotes for all major and most minor equipment as well as contractor quotes for major construction contracts. Multiple quotes were received for all major packages (three or more in most cases). Where project specific quotes were not available a reasonable estimate or allowance was made based on recent quotes in KCA/IMC’s files. In total, more than 90% of the Project direct costs are based on supplier and contractor quotes.

 

The average LOM operating cost for the Project is US$8.43 per tonne of ore processed. Table 1-5 presents the LOM operating cost requirements for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Table 1-5


Operating Cost Summary

 

Description LOM Cost
(US$/t)
Mine $3.30
Process & Support Services $3.38
Site G & A $1.75
Total $8.43

 

Mining costs were provided by IMC at US$2.14 per tonne mined (LOM US$3.30 per tonne of ore) and are based on quotes for contract mining with estimated owner’s mining costs.

 

Process operating costs have been estimated by KCA from first principles. Labour costs were estimated using project specific staffing, salary and wage and benefit requirements. Unit consumptions of materials, supplies, power, water and delivered supply costs were also estimated. LOM average processing costs are estimated at US$3.38 per tonne ore.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-16

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

General administrative costs (G&A) have been estimated by KCA with input from Orla. G&A costs include project specific labour and salary requirements and operating expenses, including social contributions, land access and water rights. G&A costs are estimated at US$1.75 per tonne ore.

 

Operating costs were estimated based on 1st quarter 2019 US dollars and are presented with no added contingency based upon the design and operating criteria present in this report. IVA is not included in the operating cost estimate.

 

The operating costs presented are based upon the ownership of all process production equipment and site facilities, including the onsite laboratory. The owner will employ and direct all process operations, maintenance and support personnel for all site activities.

 

1.13 Cautionary Statements

 

1.13.1 Forward Looking Information

 

This document contains “forward-looking information” as defined in applicable securities laws. Forward looking information includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the FS, including but not limited to future production, costs and expenses of the Project; estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources; commodity prices and exchange rates; mine production plans; projected mining and process recovery rates; mining dilution assumptions; sustaining costs and operating costs; interpretations and assumptions regarding joint venture and potential contract terms; closure costs and requirements; the ability to reach agreement with the Adjacent Owner; government regulations and permitting timelines; requirements for additional capital; environmental, permitting and social risks; and general business and economic conditions. Often, but not always, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “continues”, “forecasts”, “projects”, “predicts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “believes”, or variations of, or the negatives of, such words and phrases, or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-17

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Forward-looking information is based on a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect, including, but not limited to, the availability of financing for production, development and exploration activities; the timelines for exploration and development activities on the Project; the availability of certain consumables and services; assumptions made in mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates, including geological interpretation grade, recovery rates, price assumption, and operational costs; and general business and economic conditions. Forward-looking information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any of the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, the assumptions underlying the production estimates not being realized, changes to the cost of production, variations in quantity of mineralized material, grade or recovery rates, geotechnical or hydrogeological considerations during mining differing from what has been assumed, failure of plant, equipment or processes, changes to availability of power or the power rates used in the cost estimates, changes to salvage values, ability to maintain social license, changes to interest or tax rates, decrease of future gold prices, cost of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment rising, the availability of financing on attractive terms, actual results of current exploration, changes in project parameters, exchange rate fluctuations, delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of local communities, environmental risks, reclamation expenses, title risks, regulatory risks and uncertainties with respect to obtaining necessary permits or delays in obtaining same, and other risks involved in the gold production, development and exploration industry, as well as those risk factors discussed in Orla’s latest Annual Information Form and its other SEDAR filings from time to time.

 

All forward-looking information herein is qualified by this cautionary statement. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Orla and the authors of this Technical Report undertake no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking information whether as a result of new information or future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable law.

 

1.13.2 Non-IFRS Measures

 

Orla has included certain non-International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) performance measures as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers and the non-IFRS measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.

 

Cash Costs per Ounce – Orla calculated cash costs per ounce by dividing the sum of operating costs, royalty costs, production taxes, refining and shipping costs, net of by-product silver credits, by payable gold ounces. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, Orla believes that this measure will be useful to external users in assessing operating performance.

 

All-In Sustaining Costs (“AISC”) – Orla has disclosed an AISC performance measure that reflects all of the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, Orla’s definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated 27 June 2013. Orla believes that this measure will be useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the ability to generate free cash flow from current operations.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-18

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

1.14 Economic Analysis

 

Based on the estimated production schedule, capital costs and operating costs, a cash flow model was prepared by KCA for the economic analysis of the Camino Rojo Project. All of the information used in this economic evaluation has been taken from work completed by KCA and other consultants working on this Project.

 

The project economics were evaluated using a discounted cash flow (DCF) method, which measures the Net Present Value (NPV) of future cash flow streams. The final economic model was based on the following assumptions:

 

· The mine production schedule from IMC.
· Period of analysis of twelve years including two years of investment and pre-production, seven years of production and three years for reclamation and closure.
· Gold price of US$1,250/oz.
· Silver prize of US$17/oz.
· Processing rate of 18,000 tpd.
· Overall recoveries of 64% for gold and 17% for silver.
· An exchange rate of 19.3 MXN$ to US$ 1
· Capital and operating costs as developed in Section 21.0 of this report.

 

The Project economics based on these criteria from the cash flow model are summarized in Table 1-6.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-19

 

 

Table 1-6


Economic Analysis Summary

 

Production Data    
Life of Mine 6.8 Years
Mine Throughput per day 18,000 Tonnes Ore /day
Mine Throughput per year 6,570,000 Tonnes Ore /year
Total Tonnes to Crusher 44,020,000 Tonnes Ore
Grade Au (Avg.) 0.73 g/t
Grade Ag (Avg.) 14.2 g/t
Contained Au oz 1,031,000 Ounces
Contained Ag oz 20,093,000 Ounces
Metallurgical Recovery Au (Overall) 64%  
Metallurgical Recovery Ag (Overall) 17%  
Average Annual Gold Production 97,000 Ounces
Average Annual Silver Production 511,000 Ounces
Total Gold Produced 662,000 Ounces
Total Silver Produced 3,479,000 Ounces
LOM Strip Ratio (W:O) 0.54  
Operating Costs (Average LOM)    
Mining $2.14 /Tonne mined
Mining (processed) $3.30 /Tonne Ore processed
Processing & Support $3.38 /Tonne Ore processed
G&A $1.75 /Tonne Ore processed
          Total Operating Cost $8.43 /Tonne Ore processed
Total By-Product Cash Cost $515 /Ounce Au
All-in Sustaining Cost $576 /Ounce Au
Capital Costs (Excluding IVA and Closure)    
Initial Capital $123 million
LOM Sustaining Capital $20 million
          Total LOM Capital $144 million
Working Capital & Initial Fills $10 million
Reclamation & Closure $20 million
Financial Analysis    
Gold Price Assumption $1,250 /Ounce
Silver Price Assumption $17 /Ounce
Average Annual Cashflow (Pre-Tax) $72 million
Average Annual Cashflow (After-Tax) $56 million
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pre-Tax 38.6%  
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax 28.7%  
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax) $227 million
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax) $142 million
Pay-Back Period (Rears based on After-Tax) 3.0 Years

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-20

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

A sensitivity analysis was performed on the project economics. Figure 1-1 and Figure 1-2 are charts showing the relative sensitivity to a number of parameters.

 

 

Figure 1-1 After-Tax IRR vs. Gold Price, Capital Cost, Operating Cost & Exchange Rate

 

 

Figure 1-2 NPV @ 5% vs. Gold Price, Capital Cost, Operating Cost & Exchange Rate

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-21

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

1.15 Interpretations and Conclusions

 

1.15.1 Conclusions

 

The work that has been completed to date has demonstrated that the Camino Rojo open pit mine and heap leach facility is a technically feasible and economically viable project. The property is conveniently located with access via Mexican highway 54 which connects the major cities of Zacatecas and Saltillo. The project terrain is predominately flat with sufficient water for operations available from wells located at the project site. Required mineral, surface and water rights have been secured.

 

The Project has been designed as an open-pit mine with heap leach for recovery of gold and silver from oxide and transition material with a LOM production of 44.0 million tonnes with an average grade of 0.73 g/t Au and 14.2 g/t Ag which amounts to 1.03 million contained ounces of gold and 20.1 million contained ounces of silver. Metallurgical test work on the material to date shows acceptable recoveries for gold and silver with low to moderate reagent consumptions. Cement agglomeration is not required for stability or permeability for heap heights up to 80 metres.

 

Ore will be crushed to P80 28mm, stockpiled, reclaimed and conveyor stacked onto the heap leach pad at an average rate of 18,000 tpd. Stacked material will be leached using low grade sodium cyanide solution and the resulting pregnant leach solution will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe plant for the recovery of gold and silver by zinc cementation followed by drying and smelting to produce the final doré product. The Project has an estimated mine life of 6.8 years.

 

1.15.2 Opportunities

 

Key opportunities for the Camino Rojo project include:

 

· If an agreement can be made with the Adjacent Owner, additional material amendable to heap leaching could be accessed which represents an opportunity for mine expansion in the future.
· In addition to the leachable oxide Mineral Resource, this report has identified Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources of 258.8 million tonnes at 0.88 g/t gold and 7.4 g/t silver that is sulphide and amenable to mill processing and flotation concentration. This amounts to 7.3 million contained ounces of gold and 61.6 million contained ounces of silver. Additional metallurgical studies will be required to evaluate potential recoveries for this material. This Mineral Resource is contained on Orla property, was not included in the Feasibility Study, and an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be required to exploit this Mineral Resource by open pit methods.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-22

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

· During Year 4 of operation, the pit depth will intersect the local water table. This will require pit dewatering for the remaining LOM of the Project. Preliminary estimates placed maximum required dewatering rates of the Oxide Pit between 49 L/s and up to 99 L/s. Recent investigations suggest that the actual maximum dewatering rate will be closer to the lower estimated value, which would reduce both the capital and operating costs to pump and evaporate excess pit water not utilized in mining and processing activities.

· Leaching cycles have been designed for 80 days, but laboratory results have shown that silver recoveries benefit from cyanide solution application beyond the 80-day period. With subsequent lifts, drain down from active lifts will result in extended leaching times on previously leached lifts. As a result of this, silver recoveries are expected to increase over the LOM of the Project.
· Due to the uniform topography of the Camino Rojo property, earthworks quantities needed for elevating the haul roads to meet the required height of the primary crusher incur large capital costs. Utilizing a decoupled system (a conveyor at lower elevation to feed the crusher) would decrease initial earthworks quantities as well as fuel requirements from truck haulage throughout the life of the Project.
· The Camino Rojo deposit occurs within a mineralized district that is highly prospective for discovery of additional deposits. New discoveries of Mineral Resources in the vicinity of the proposed mine may be accretive to the Project.
     
1.15.3 Risks

 

Risks for the Camino Rojo project include:

 

1.15.3.1 Mining

 

· Camino Rojo considers contract mining. There is a risk that the selected mining contractor may require financial assistance from the owner, which may increase costs. Contract mining is common in Mexico and this risk can be minimized by careful evaluation of potential contractors.
· Mining operations will eventually be conducted below the water table. Estimates of pit dewatering requirements have been prepared for cost purposes, but additional hydrogeological studies need to be conducted. There is a risk that the estimated pit dewatering costs may change as a result of these studies.
· There is geotechnical risk associated with the base case mine plan that is constrained by the property boundary. Mitigation of any slope failures of the north wall could prove difficult due to lack of access to the ground to the north. The design slope angles on the north and west walls are relatively steep and assume aggressive slope reinforcement. The slope angles will be flatter than design if this system fails to work as expected. This could reduce the amount of material mined and the amount of ore available for processing.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-23

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

1.15.3.2 Metallurgy and Process

 

· Carbonaceous material with preg-robbing characteristics has been identified, which may reduce overall heap performance and metal recovery if processed. With regard to gold and silver recovery the Camino Rojo deposit shows preg-robbing organic carbon as being the only significant deleterious element identified, which is primarily associated with the transition material at depth along the outer edges of the deposit. Preg robbing presents a low risk to the overall Project. A significant investigation by Orla into the preg robbing material which was reviewed by KCA indicates that preg robbing material will most likely not be encountered until later in the Project life and can be mitigated by proper ore control.
· There is a risk that Merrill-Crowe efficiencies may be poor, particularly during initial operations due to low pregnant solution concentrations of gold and silver. This may result in increased zinc consumption and delayed metal recoveries.
· Evaporators for pit dewatering require a minimum operating depth in the pond for operation which is assumed to be approximately 1.5 metres, or approximately 46,500 m3 of solution. Based on the pond sizing criteria there is sufficient capacity in the event pond to accommodate this additional solution for the planned heap without any changes. However, evaporation rates of water from the pit may not consistently be as estimated which may lead to some periodic short-term loss of pond storage.
     
1.15.3.3 Access, Title and Permitting

 

· The Project is subject to normal risks regarding access, title, permitting, and security. The Project has had a productive relationship with the surface owners and no extraordinary risks to project access were discerned. Conditional upon continued compliance with annual requirements, no risk to validity of title was discerned. Conditional upon compliance with applicable regulations, permits for normal exploration activities, mine construction, and mine operation are expected to be attainable. Drug related violence, propagated by members of criminal cartels and directed against other members of criminal cartels, has occurred in the region and has affected local communities. The aggression is not directed at mining companies operating in the region and has not affected the ability of Orla or previous operators to explore the Camino Rojo property.
· There is a risk due to a possible Federal designation of a protected biological-ecological reserve known as “Zacatecas Semiarid Desert” as a Natural Protected Area (ANP). If a designation of this ANP by the government includes the surface of the mining concession areas or ancillary work areas such as possible water well fields of Camino Rojo, this could limit the growth and continuity of the Project. Mining activities (including both exploration and exploitation), depending on the corresponding sub-zone may be carried out provided they are authorized by CONANP (National Commission on Protected Natural Areas), without prejudice of other authorizations required for their execution. Goldcorp, the prior operator of the Project, engaged in forums with government and community stakeholders, and submitted an official opinion regarding this ANP declaration to the government, with the objective of ensuring that if an ANP was created, the Camino Rojo Project would not be restricted from development. Since the time that the idea of creating an ANP was first proposed there has been no formal movement on the proposal. Because the State and Municipal governments affected by the Camino Rojo project have formally expressed opposition to creation of the ANP in the area of the Camino Rojo Project, the authors believe the permitting risk is similar to that of any mining project of similar scope in North America.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-24

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

1.15.3.4 Other Risks

 

· The Project considers running a powerline from Conception Del Oro to the Project site, approximately 55 km, early in the Project life. The application for the powerline requires an investigation by CENACE to determine where the Project is allowed to connect to the national grid, followed by approval from the Mexican Federal Electric Commission (CFE) to construct and energize the powerline. It is estimated that in Year 2 of operations power supply will be available by connecting to the national commercial grid and power generation at site will no longer be needed. There is a possibility that connection to the national grid will occur later than Year 2 and will require an extended time period of diesel power generation. This delay in access to line power would incur additional operating costs for any duration beyond the expected date of connection to the commercial power grid. At this time, Orla is well underway with the application process and is currently waiting on results from the CENACE investigation.
· The primary Project production well (PW-1) underwent a 10,000-minute pumping test and a sustained flow of 32 L/s was maintained. However, there is a risk that the fracture system in the limestone has limited potential to provide water and that flow to the well could decrease over the life of the Project. Development of additional wells will mitigate this risk.
· An ecological tax implemented by the state Congress of Zacatecas in 2017 could have a significant impact on the economics of the Project. This tax is applied to cubic metres of material extracted during mining, square metres of material impacted by dangerous substances, tonnes of carbon dioxide produced during mining processes and tonnes of waste stored in landfills. Due to the uncertainty of application of this tax and turbulence between active mining companies and the State of Zacatecas, the long-term effects and implementation of this ecological tax are currently unknown and are not considered in this report.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-25

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

1.16 Recommendations

 

1.16.1 KCA Recommendations

 

This Report presents an economically robust project. Based on these results, the following future work is recommended by KCA:

 

· Application and approval for the power line to the project site should continue to be advanced. Estimated costs for this are approximately US$130,000 and are included in the cost estimates of the Report.
· Engage with Adjacent Property Owner to reach an agreement allowing expansion of the proposed mine pit and Mineral Resource.
     
1.16.2 RGI Recommendations

 

RGI recommends a phased exploration program. Phase 1, at a total cost of US$3.25 million, consists of:

 

· 950 line-km of induced polarization (IP) geophysical surveys to seek additional mineralized zones concealed by colluvium.
· A 5,000m core drill program to evaluate the sulphide resource underlying and adjacent to the oxide and transition mineralization that is the focus of the FS.
· A 5,000m RC drill program to test IP anomalies already identified.

 

Phase 2, at a total cost of US$1.8 million, is conditional upon identification of new IP anomalies, and comprises:

 

· A 5,000m RC drill program to test newly identified IP anomalies.
· A 5,000m core drilling program to evaluate the mineralized zones thus discovered.
     
1.16.3 Barranca Recommendations

 

Barranca recommends the following at a total estimated cost of approximately US$1.1 million which is included in the report cost estimates in this Report:

 

· Additional RC test drilling leading to the construction of one or more back-up reserve production wells which should have a pump-tested sustainable capacity of at least 15 to 20 L/s.
· Drilling and construction of all five proposed monitor wells during the 2019 calendar year or early 2020 in order to define the direction of groundwater movement as well as baseline water quality.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

1.0 Summary

Page 1-26

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

2.0 INTRODUCTION

 

2.1 Introduction and Overview

 

This NI 43-101 Technical Report is a summary of the Feasibility Study on the Camino Rojo Project and is in compliance with disclosure and reporting requirements set forth in the Canadian Securities Administrators’ current “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” under the provisions of NI 43-101, Companion Policy NI 43-101 CP and Form NI 43-101F1 and supersedes a National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report prepared by KCA dated 19 June 2018 and amended 11 March 2019 titled, “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project - Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”.

 

This Technical Report is issued to Orla. Orla is listed on the TSX Exchange (TSX: OLA) and holds a 100% interest in the Camino Rojo deposit through its Mexican subsidiary MCR. This report was prepared by KCA, IMC, RGI and Barranca with input from other consultant groups.

 

The Feasibility Study commenced during July 2018 and was completed during June 2019.

 

2.2 Project Scope and Terms of Reference

 

2.2.1 Scope of Work

 

Orla commissioned KCA to evaluate the Camino Rojo Project to Feasibility Study standards. This Report is led by KCA and incorporates work from other groups including IMC for mine development and costs, RGI for the property descriptions and geology, Barranca for water supply, pit dewatering and ground water modeling, HydroGeoLogica Inc. (HydroGeoLogica) for heap leach pad and waste dump runoff models, Piteau Associates (Piteau) for geotechnical investigations and RGI for the property descriptions and geology. A more detailed scope description for each group is included below.

 

KCA’s scope of work for the project is summarized as follows:

 

· Review of new and historical metallurgical tests and interpretation,
· Process design and recovery methods,
· Infrastructure design,
· Infrastructure and process capital and operating costs,
· General and administrative (G&A) costs with input from Orla mining.
· Economic analysis, and
· Overall report preparation and compilation.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

2.0 Introduction

Page 2-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

IMC’s scope of work for the project is summarized as follows:

 

· Audit the drill hole database for the Camino Rojo deposit,
· Develop the Mineral Resource block model for the deposit,
· Estimate Mineral Resource,
· Estimate Mineral Reserve,
· Develop an operational mine plan for the open pit, and
· Mining capital and operating costs including evaluation of contract mining quotes.

 

RGI’s scope of the work for the project is summarized as follows:

 

· Property description, including reporting on exploration work completed by Orla, geology and mineralization, environmental liabilities, location, access, physiography, infrastructure, claim ownership, and surface rights ownership,
· Assessment of regulatory requirements and description of the steps required to obtain construction and operating permits for the mine plan described in this report,
· Assess risks to project development related to access, title, permits, and security.

 

Barranca’s scope of the work for the project is summarized as follows:

 

· Ground water model, and
· Production well location and development.

 

HydroGeoLogica’s scope of the work for the project is summarized as follows:

 

· Heap rinsing and drain down,
· Acid rock drainage and metal leaching potential,
· Heap and waste rock facility closure plans, and
· Pit lake model.

 

Piteau’s scope of the work for the project is summarized as follows:

 

· Geotechnical investigations and analysis for the mine pit, waste rock dump and heap leach facilities.

 

The scope of this report also includes a study of information obtained from public documents; other literature sources cited; and cost information from public documents and recent estimates from previous studies conducted by KCA.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

2.0 Introduction

Page 2-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

This Technical Report is intended to provide the project’s economics and to give guidance for the implementation of the Camino Rojo project.

 

2.2.2 Terms of Reference

 

The purpose of this Report is to disclose Mineral Reserves for the Camino Rojo property, summarize the Feasibility Study completed on the property and disclose an updated Mineral Resource estimate for the property. This report supports information disclosed in a press release dated 25 June 2019.

 

The units of measure presented in this report, unless noted otherwise, are in the metric system. The currency used for all costs is presented in US Dollars (US$ or $), unless specified otherwise. The costs were estimated based on quotes and cost data as of 1st Quarter 2019. For all major equipment packages, construction contracts and infrastructure items multiple quotes were obtained.

 

The economic evaluation of the Project has been conducted on a constant dollar basis (Q1 2019) with a gold price of US$1,250 per ounce and a silver price of US$17 per ounce for the Base Case. Economic evaluation is done on a Project basis and from the point of view of a private investor, after deductions for royalties, income taxes, and various mining taxes and duties paid to the government of Mexico. An exchange ratio of 19.3 Mexican pesos = US$1 was used for any costs converted from Mexican currency.

 

2.3 Sources of Information

 

KCA has taken all reasonable care in producing the information contained in this report. The information, conclusions and estimates contained in this report are consistent with information available at the time of preparation, the data supplied by outside sources and assumptions, conditions and qualifications set forth in this report. The authors of this report are Carl Defilippi, Michael G. Hester, Dr. Matthew Gray and David Hawkins, each of whom is a Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101.

 

The information in this report is not a substitute for independent professional advice before making any investment decisions. Any information in this report cannot be modified without the express written permission from KCA.

 

The primary sources of information used for this technical report are set out in Section 27, References, and include:

 

· The 24 June 2019 Feasibility Report titled “Project Feasibility Study on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” and accompanying appendices.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

2.0 Introduction

Page 2-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

· The digital drillhole database. This includes work developed during the Canplats, Goldcorp and Orla tenures.
· The original assay certificates for the holes.
· Various geologic solids that were developed (interpreted) by Orla geologists.
· Various reports, including previous reports on sampling methodology, quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC), resource modeling, geotechnical and slope stability, mine planning, and economic evaluations. These were developed by Canplats, Goldcorp, and various consultants.
· Various new reports for water production and supply and site geotechnical evaluations.
· Various reports on metallurgical testing, process recovery, and mineral processing that were developed by Canplats, Goldcorp, Orla and various consultants.
· Published reports on Mexican taxes and duties.

 

KCA, IMC, RGI and Barranca reviewed the data and only used data that were deemed reliable for this Report.

 

2.4 Qualified Persons and Site Visits

 

The processing studies, cost estimations, and financial analysis and review of current and historical metallurgical data were conducted by KCA under the auspices of Carl Defilippi, RM SME, of Reno, NV. Mr. Defilippi is an independent Qualified Person under NI 43-101 and is responsible for Sections 1.1, 1.5, 1.9, 1.10, 1.12, 1.13, 1.14, 1.15.1, 1.15.2, 1.15.3.2, 1.15.3.4, 1.16.1, 2, 3, 12.2, 12.3, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20.1.7, 21.0, 21.1, 21.1.2, 21.1.3 through 21.1.9, 21.2, 21.2.2, 21.3, 22, 24.1, 24.2, 25.1, 25.1.2, 25.2.3, 25.3.2, 25.3.4, 26.1, 27 and 28 of the Report. Mr. Defilippi visited the site on 20 and 21 of February 2018 and on 17 and 18 of January 2019. On these dates, Mr. Defilippi inspected the Project site and proposed locations for the process facilities and site infrastructure, examined drill core, and discussed geology and site conditions with Orla personnel.

 

Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM, Vice President and Principal Mining Engineer for IMC, is an independent Qualified Person under NI 43-101 and is responsible for Sections 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.15.3.1, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.5.1, 10.6.1, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3.1, 11.3.2, 11.4.1, 12.1.1, 12.1.3, 14, 15, 16, 21.1.1, 21.2.1, 24.4, 25.1.1, 25.2.1, 25.2.2 and 25.3.1 of the Report. Mr. Hester is responsible for drilling, sample analysis, security and data verification, Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates, the mine plan used for the FS, and the mine capital and operating cost estimates. Mr. Hester visited the site on 20 and 21 February 2018. The purpose of the site visit was to examine site conditions, examine drill core, discuss project geology with Orla personnel, discuss the drilling database and sample and analytical procedures and to discuss previous work on the Project by Canplats and Goldcorp.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

2.0 Introduction

Page 2-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G, the Qualified Person responsible for Sections 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.11, 1.15.3.3, 1.16.2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.4, 10.5.2, 10.6.2, 11.3.3, 11.4.2, 12.1.2, 20 exclusive of 20.1.7, 23, 25.1.3, 25.2.4, 25.3.3, and 26.2 of this Report, conducted field visits to the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Zacatecas, Mexico, during the period 12 to 13 December 2016 as part of Orla’s due diligence review of the project, which at the time was owned and operated by Goldcorp. During his visit, Dr. Gray reviewed drill core, the geologic and resource model created by Goldcorp, assay and geologic data, and site infrastructure. In 2018, Dr Gray visited again during the periods 19 to 22 February, 18 to 20 July, and 20 to 24 August. Additional site visits were made in 2019 in the periods 17 to 18 January and 8 to 12 April. During the 2018 and 2019 site visits, Dr. Gray: designed and implemented drill program QA QC protocols; reviewed new drill core; verified 2018 and 2019 drill data; checked the new geologic and resource model for consistency with drillhole data; met with, and reviewed the work of consultants preparing environmental baseline studies and permitting documents; met with Orla’s Mexican legal counsel to discuss status of land, mineral, and water rights agreements; and reviewed the results of regional exploration programs. Dr. Gray is an independent Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101.

 

David B. Hawkins, CPG, AIPG of Barranca Group LLC is an independent Qualified Person responsible for Sections 1.16.3, 24.3, and 26.3 of the Report. Mr. Hawkins is responsible for the ground water model. Mr. Hawkins has spent significant portions of time at the Project site for water supply development between 2018 and 2019. During his time at the Project Mr. Hawkins has conducted regional groundwater reconnaissance including visits to local groundwater wells. In addition, he has directly supervised exploration drilling activities, and he has directly supervised the test pumping of wells PW-1, PW-2, and CR-01.

 

There is no affiliation between Mr. Defilippi, Mr. Hester, Dr. Gray and Mr. Hawkins and Orla, except that of an independent consultant / client relationship.

 

The effective date of the Mineral Resource is 7 June 2019. The effective date of the Mineral Reserve is 24 June 2019. The effective date of this Technical Report is 25 June 2019.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

2.0 Introduction

Page 2-5

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

2.5 Frequently Used Acronyms, Abbreviations, Definitions and Units of Measure

 

All costs are presented in United States dollars. Units of measurement are metric. Only common and standard abbreviations were used wherever possible. A list of abbreviations used is as follows:

 

Distances: mm – millimetre
  cm         – centimetre
  m         – metre
  km         – kilometre
  mbgl        – metres below ground level
  masl        – metres above sea level
Areas: m2 or sqm – square metre
  ha         – hectare
  km2 – square kilometre
Weights: oz – troy ounces
  Koz        – 1,000 troy ounces
  Moz        – 1,000,000 troy ounces
  g        – grams
  kg        – kilograms
  T or t – tonne (1000 kg)
  Kt         – 1,000 tonnes
  Mt         – 1,000,000 tonnes
Time: min – minute
  h or hr – hour
  op hr – operating hour
  d         – day
  yr        – year
  Ma        – Mega-annum (one million years)
Volume/Flow: m3 or cu m – cubic metre
  m3/h – cubic metres per hour
  L/s        – litres per second
Assay/Grade: g/t – grams per tonne
  kg/t        – kilograms per tonne
  g/t Au – grams gold per tonne
  g/t Ag – grams silver per tonne
  ppm        – parts per million;
  ppb        – parts per billion

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

2.0 Introduction

Page 2-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Other: TPD or tpd – metric tonnes per day
  ktpy – 1,000 tonnes per year
  kph        – kilometres per hour
  m3/h/m2 – cubic metres per hour per square metre
  Lph/m2 – litres per hour per square metre
  L/s/km2 – litres per second per square kilometres
  g/L        – grams per litre
  Ag        – silver
  As        – arsenic
  Au        – gold
  Ba        – barium
  Hg        – mercury
  Pb        – lead
  Sb        – antimony
  Zn        – zinc
  US$ or $ – United States dollar
  MXN$        – Mexican Peso
  NaCN       – sodium cyanide
  TSS        – total suspended solids
  TDS        – total dissolved solids
  DDH        – diamond drill boreholes
  LOM        – life of mine
  RAB        – rotary air blast
  ROM        – run of mine
  RC        – reverse circulation
  RQD        - rock quality data
  Preg        – pregnant solution
  kWh        – kilowatt-hours
  V        – volts
  kVa        – kilo-volt-ampere
  TEM        – transient electromagnetic
  P80 – 80% passing
  P100 – 100% passing
  KN        – kilonewton
  CMU        – concrete masonry unit
  HLP        – heap leach pad
  TSX        – Toronto Stock Exchange
  Owner        – Orla Mining LTD.
  Adjacent Owner – Fresnillo PLC
  NAD27        – North American Datum of 1927 coordinates
  WGS84       – World Geodetic System (1984) coordinates

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

2.0 Introduction

Page 2-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS

 

All of the work summarized above was prepared under the supervision of a Qualified Person or has been reviewed and approved by a Qualified Person. The authors would like to acknowledge those who assisted in the study as “non-Qualified Persons” and their respective inputs are listed:

 

· James Hogarth and Chris Wattam, Piteau Associates, Vancouver BC (geotechnical investigations for pit slope stability, heap leach facility and waste rock dump stability) (Piteau, 2019).
· Jake Waples and Brent Johnson, HydroGeoLogica, Golden CO (heap and waste rock dump closure, pit lake model geochemistry) (HydroGeoLogica, 2019).

 

The authors are not experts in Mexican legal, civil, environmental or tax matters and accordingly for Items 4.2, 4.3, 4.5, and 4.6 the authors have relied upon:

 

· For legal matters regarding mining concession title, opinion was provided by Lic. Mauricio Heiras, Mexican legal counsel for Orla on 28 June 2017 (Heiras, 2017) and in reports dated 6 January 2018 (Heiras, 2018) and 18 June 2019 (Heiras, 2019).
· For legal matters regarding surface rights, land access agreement summaries were provided by Lic. Mauricio Heiras, Mexican legal counsel for Orla in a report dated 28 June 2017(Heiras, 2017) and reports dated 6 January 2018 (Heiras, 2018) and 18 June 2019 (Heiras, 2019).
· For legal matters on environmental permitting, reports were prepared by Lic. Mauricio Heiras, Mexican legal counsel for Orla, dated 28 June 2017 (Heiras, 2017) and 18 June 2019 (Heiras, 2019).
· For the 24-hour storm event for different periods, the report prepared by NewFields Servicios de Mexico dated 1 February 2019 titled "Diseno Conceptual de Manejo de Aguas Pluviales y Control de Sedimentacion, Proyecto Minero Camino Rojo, San Tiburcio, Zacatecas, Mexico" (NewFields, 2019).
· For an independent assessment of social and community impacts of development of the Camino Rojo project, and to provide guidance on actions and policies needed to insure that Orla obtains and maintains social licence to operate the project, the conclusions and data contained in a report prepared by Environmental Resources Management (ERM), a global provider of environmental, health, safety, risk, social consulting services and sustainability related services, titled “Estudio de Impacto Social para el Proyecto Minero “Camino Rojo”, Marzo 2019 Proyecto No.: 0460594” (ERM, 2019).

 

Except for the purposes legislated under provincial securities laws, any use of this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

3.0 Reliance on Other Experts

Page 3-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

 

4.1 Area and Location

 

The Camino Rojo property is located in the Municipality of Mazapil, State of Zacatecas, Mexico near the village of San Tiburcio. The property lies 190km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54km S-SE of Newmont’s Peñasquito Mine (Figure 4-1). The Project area is centred at approximately 244150E 2675900N UTM NAD27 Zone 14N.

 

All geographic references in this report utilize UTM Zone 14N datum NAD27 unless otherwise stated.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 4-1 Location Map, Camino Rojo Project

 

4.2 Claims and Title

 

The author is not an expert in Mexican mining law. The author has relied upon Orla’s legal counsel in Mexico, Lic. Mauricio Heiras of Chihuahua, Chihuahua for a review of the concession titles and legal framework, as shown in Table 4-1. Lic. Heiras verified that the concessions are in good standing and ownership of all eight concessions has been registered to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, (Heiras, 2017), (Heiras, 2018), (Heiras, 2019).

 

All minerals rights in Mexico are the property of the government of Mexico and may be exploited by private entities under concessions granted by the Mexican federal government. The process was defined under the Mexican Mining Law of 1992 and excludes petroleum and nuclear resources from consideration. The Mexican mining law also requires that non-Mexican entities must either establish a Mexican corporation, or partner with a Mexican entity.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Under current Mexican mining law, amended 29 April 2005, the Direccion General de Minas (‘DGM’) grants concessions for a period of 50 years, provided the concession is maintained in good standing. There is no distinction between mineral exploration and exploitation concessions. As part of the requirements to maintain a concession in good standing, bi-annual fees must be paid based upon a per-hectare escalating fee, work expenditures must be incurred in amounts determined on the basis of concession size and age, and applicable environmental regulations must be respected.

 

The northern edge of the Camino Rojo deposit identified in this technical report extends onto mining concessions controlled by the Adjacent Owner that are not part of the Project holdings. However, all interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report relate exclusively to the mining concessions that comprise the Camino Rojo property.

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Mineral Resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to constrain the Mineral Resource and demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by the Adjacent Owner and that material would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles to access the deeper parts of the Mineral Resource estimate. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner.

 

The Feasibility Study is based on only a portion of the total Mineral Resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the proposed mine plan in the Report. However, delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement would affect the development of a significant portion of the Mineral Resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Orla intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full Mineral Resource. There can be no assurance that Orla will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to Orla or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The Camino Rojo property consists of eight concessions covering in aggregate 205,936.867 hectares. The Los Cardos concession was originally staked and titled to Explominerals SA de CV whereas all other concessions were staked and titled to Canplats de Mexico SA de CV, whose legal name was subsequently changed to Camino Rojo SA de CV. The concession rights of Explominerals were transferred to Camino Rojo SA de CV. Camino Rojo SA de CV subsequently ceded all mining claims to Minera Peñasquito SA de CV, who in turn sold the mining claims to MCR.

 

Concession information is summarized in Table 4-1, and the concessions are shown in Figure 4-2.

 

Table 4-1


Listing of Mining Concessions

 

Concession Name File Number
(Expediente)
Title
Number
Validity Area
Title Issued
Date
Expiration
Date
Hectares
Camino Rojo 093/28336 230914 06/11/2007 05/11/2057 8,340.7905
Camino Rojo 1 093/28349 231922 16/05/2008 15/05/2058 88,897.3255
Camino Rojo 1 Frac. A 093/28349 231923 16/05/2008 15/05/2058 96.8888
Camino Rojo 3 093/28425 232014 03/06/2008 02/06/2058 30,050.0000
Camino Rojo 2 093/28417 232076 10/06/2008 09/06/2058 17,847.4398
Camino Rojo 4 093/28465 232644 02/10/2008 01/10/2058 9,701.0000
Camino Rojo 5 093/28534 232647 02/10/2008 01/10/2058 33,018.4718
Los Cardos 093/28561 232652 02/10/2008 01/10/2058 17,984.9513

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 4-2 Mining Concessions, Camino Rojo Property

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The legal standing of these claims and the ownership of surface rights have been verified by Lic. Mauricio Heiras. Prior to entering into purchase option agreements for the concessions, Orla requested a title opinion for the concessions from Orla’s legal counsel in Mexico, Lic. Mauricio Heiras of Chihuahua, Chihuahua, who investigated the concession status and reported that the claims were valid. Subsequent to Orla’s acquisition of the Project, and as of the effective date of this Report, Lic. Heiras has confirmed that MCR has maintained the concessions in good standing and all concessions are current with respect to payment of mining taxes and filing of assessment reports (Heiras, 2019).

 

4.2.1 Orla Control of Mining Concessions via Acquisition from Minera Peñasquito SA de CV

 

The claims are controlled by Orla by means of its ownership of Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, which acquired the concessions from Newmont’s Mexican subsidiary, Minera Peñasquito SA de CV. A summary of Orla’s and Newmont’s rights and obligations under the terms of the acquisition agreement is as follows:

 

· Goldcorp, a subsidiary company to Newmont, was granted a 2% NSR on all metal production from the Project, except for metals produced under the sulphide joint venture option stipulated in the acquisition agreement.
· Orla is the operator of the Camino Rojo Project and has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property.
· In the event that a sulphide project is defined through a positive Pre-Feasibility Study outlining one of the development scenarios a) or b) contained herein, Newmont may, at its option, enter into a joint venture for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of the sulphide project.
o Scenario a): A sulphide project where material from the Camino Rojo Project is processed using the existing infrastructure of the Peñasquito Mine, Mill and Concentrator facilities. In such circumstances, the sulphide project would be operated by Newmont, who would earn a 70% interest in the sulphide project, with Orla owning 30%.
o Scenario b): A standalone sulphide project with a mine plan containing at least 500 million tonnes of Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves using standalone facilities not associated with Peñasquito. Under this scenario, the sulphide project would be operated by Newmont, who would earn a 60% interest in the sulphide project, with Orla owning 40%.
· Following exercise of its option, if Newmont elects to sell its portion of the sulphide project, in whole or in part, then Orla would retain a right of first refusal on the sale of the sulphide project.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

· For as long as Newmont maintains ownership of at least 10% of Orla common shares, Newmont has the right to nominate one director to the board of Orla and to participate in all future equity offerings to maintain its prorated ownership.
· Orla will retain a right of first refusal on Newmont’s NSR, Newmont’s portion of the sulphide project, following the exercise of its option, and certain claims retained by Newmont.
· Carry forward of assessment work credits will be applied to the Camino Rojo property concessions thus no expenditures are immediately required to meet assessment work requirements.
     
4.2.2 Pending Concession Reductions

 

Currently, ongoing exploration programs are identifying the most prospective areas surrounding the Camino Rojo deposit, and Orla, through its Mexican subsidiary MCR plans to reduce its mineral concession holdings to 1,631 km2 by relinquishing mineral rights to the least prospective ground. Newmont retains the right to re-acquire the mineral rights to any lands released by MCR. If Newmont does not elect to exercise its rights, the released mineral concessions will revert to Federal control.

 

4.3 Surface Rights

 

The author is not an expert in Mexican legal surface rights or contract law. The author has relied upon Orla’s legal counsel in Mexico, Lic. Mauricio Heiras of Chihuahua, Chihuahua for a review of the Project surface rights (Heiras, 2017), (Heiras, 2018), (Heiras,2019) as discussed in Section 3.0 of this report.

 

Surface rights in the Project area are owned by several Ejidos, which are federally defined agrarian communities. The land which includes the Mineral Resource at Camino Rojo is controlled by the San Tiburcio Ejido, comprised of 400 voting members who collectively control 37,154 hectares. The legal ownership of surface rights verification and the information contained herein comes from summary reports prepared by Orla’s legal counsel in Mexico, Lic. Mauricio Heiras.

 

Areas for which MCR controls surface rights include both areas with and without mineral rights, with the latter being maintained for possible infrastructure purposes. Surface rights controlled are shown in Figure 4-3.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 4-3 Surface rights in Project Area

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Exploration work at the Project has been carried out under the terms of surface access agreements negotiated with the Ejido San Tiburcio and executed on 26 February 2013 and 31 October 2018. Camino Rojo SA de CV (a Goldcorp subsidiary) executed agreements with the Ejido that cover the Camino Rojo Mineral Resource. Camino Rojo SA de CV subsequently passed the rights and obligations of these agreements to Minera Peñasquito SA de CV (a Goldcorp subsidiary), who subsequently transferred the rights and obligations to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV. The three agreements currently in effect with Ejido San Tiburcio are:

 

i. Previous to Expropriation Occupation Agreement (COPE), executed on 26 February 2013 by and between Camino Rojo SA de CV, in its position of “occupant”, and Ejido San Tiburcio, as the owner, with regards to a surface of 2,497.30 hectares. The rights and obligations of this agreement were passed to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV and the agreement stipulates that the Ejido expressly and voluntarily accepts the expropriation of Ejido lands by Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, in effect converting the Ejido land to fee simple private land titled to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV. In the event that the Federal agency responsible for the expropriation process, the Secretario de Desarollo Agrario Territorial y Urbano, denies the petition to cede the Ejido lands to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, the agreement automatically converts to a 30-year temporary occupation agreement. Payment in full was made at the date of signing and no further payments are due. This agreement is valid and expires in 2043 and covers the area of the Mineral Resource discussed in this report.

 

ii. Temporary Occupation Agreement (COT), executed on 30 October 2018 by and between Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, in its position of occupant, and Ejido San Tiburcio, as owner, with regards to a surface of 5,850 hectares (the “TOA”). This agreement allows Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV to explore 5,850 hectares of Ejido lands over a 5-year period, while the expropriation process is executed. Payments of 10,000,000 Pesos on signing, 5,000,000 Pesos on 15 December 2019, 5,000,000 Pesos on 15 December 2020, and 5,000,000 Pesos on 15 December 2021 are required to maintain the agreement in force. The 10,000,000 Peso payment was made at the date of signing and no further payments are due until 15 December 2019.

 

iii. Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement (CSRA), executed on 26 February 2013 by and between Camino Rojo SA de CV, in its position of “collaborator”, and Ejido San Tiburcio, as “beneficiary”, with regards to certain social contributions to be provided in favour of this last CSRA. The rights and obligations of this agreement were passed to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV and the agreement stipulates that Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV will contribute 10,000,000 Pesos annually to the Ejido to be used to promote and execute diverse social and economic development programs to benefit the Ejido. Additionally, at its discretion, Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV will provide support for adult education, career training, business development assistance, and cultural programs, and scholastic scholarships. The agreement expires when exploration or exploitation activities at the Camino Rojo Project end. Annual payments are due on the 29th of June each year. This agreement is valid and remains in effect until mine closure or project cancellation.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Camino Rojo SA de CV executed a surface rights agreement with Ejido Francisco de los Quijano. The rights and obligations of this agreement were passed to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV. This agreement, executed on 22 December 2014, is a Temporary Occupation Agreement (COT) that allows Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV to conduct exploration activities on 7,666 Ha, as shown in Figure 4-3. The agreement expires on 21 December 2019. None of the Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves discussed in this report, nor proposed infrastructure is located on Ejido Francisco de los Quijano land. Annual payments of 9,134,749 Pesos are required to keep the agreement in good standing. Simultaneously with the execution of the COT, Camino Rojo SA de CV executed a Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement with the Ejido which obligates Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV to: provide 19,000 Pesos in monthly scholarships to the Ejido; complete electrification of an Ejido water well and rehabilitate/reconstruct the community cistern; assist Ejido members with finding appropriate employment opportunities with Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV and its contractors; and to provide basic food rations to community members in need. The CSRA expires on 21 December 2019.

 

Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV executed a surface rights agreement with Ejido El Berrendo on 4 March 2019. None of the Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves discussed in this report, nor proposed infrastructure, is located on Ejido El Berrendo land. This Temporary Occupation Agreement (COT) allows Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV to conduct exploration activities on 2,631 Ha, as shown in Figure 4-3. The agreement expires on 24 February 2024. A payment on signing and annual payments of $2,284,787 Pesos are required to keep the agreement in good standing. The next payment is due on 24 February 2020.

 

4.4 Environmental Liability

 

No environmental liabilities are apparent. The property does not contain active or historic mines or prospects, there are no plant facilities present within the Project area, nor are tailings piles present, and all exploration work has been carried out by prior operators in accordance with Mexican environmental standards.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-10

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

4.5 Permits

 

The author is not an expert in Mexican environmental law. The author has relied upon Orla’s legal counsel in Mexico, Lic. Mauricio Heiras of Chihuahua, Chihuahua for a summary review of the Project environmental permits (Heiras, Legal opinion letter, 2017), (Heiras, 2019) and a public domain Federal report (CONANP, 2014) for a review of permitting risks discussed in this report.

 

The Ley de Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable (Sustainable Development Forest Law) and the Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y Protección al Ambiente (General Law of Ecologic Equilibrium and Environmental Protection) regulate all direct exploration activities carried out at Camino Rojo (reverse circulation drilling, core drilling, trenching, road construction, etc.). Surface disturbances caused by exploration activities require a Cambio de Uso de Suelo (CUS, Land Use Change) authorization and approval of an Environmental Impact Assessment (MIA).

 

The National Water Law regulates all water use in Mexico under the responsibility of Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA). Applications are submitted to CONAGUA indicating the annual water needs for mining activities and the source of water to be used. CONAGUA grants water concessions according to stipulated water availability in the source area. Minera Camino Rojo is the title holder of subsurface water rights totaling 9,695,900 cubic metres per annum for industrial use (Heiras, 2019).

 

Current exploration work at the Project is being conducted under the approval of two MIA and CUS permits.

 

Construction and operation of a mine at Camino Rojo will require various Federal, State, and Municipal permits as discussed in Section 20.2 of this report.

 

4.6 Access, Title, Permit and Security Risks

 

4.6.1 Access Risks

 

The Project has had a productive relationship with the surface owners and no extraordinary risks to Project access were discerned. A valid surface access agreement allows Orla, through its Mexican subsidiary Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, to explore and develop the Project described for the Feasibility Study base case summarized herein.

 

4.6.2 Title Risks

 

Prior operators and Minera Camino Rojo have met legal requirements to maintain in good standing the mining concession titles. Conditional upon continued compliance with annual requirements, no risk to validity of title was discerned.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

4.6.3 Permit Risks

 

Prior operators and Minera Camino Rojo have been compliant with Mexican environmental regulations and conditional upon continued compliance, permits for normal exploration activities are expected to be readily attainable.

 

The chief Project permitting risk is that of a possible Federal designation of a protected biological-ecological reserve that could affect the Project. On 23 June 2014 SEMARNAT published a public notice in the Official Gazette of the Federation requesting public consultation and comments on the possible designation of an area known as “Zacatecas Semiarid Desert” as a Natural Protected Area (ANP). The proposed area for designation is located in the Municipalities of General Francisco Murguía, Villa de Cos, El Salvador, Melchor Ocampo, Concepción de Oro and Mazapil, in the State of Zacatecas (CONANP, 2014). The proposal for the ANP was created by the Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP). CONANP does not have legal authority to designate the ANP, this power being reserved for the Executive branch of Mexican Federal government. Public reaction to the ANP proposal has been mixed, with the Zacatecas State government, affected Municipalities, and private and public Mexican companies publicly and formally opposing the designation of an ANP in areas of current mining and exploration activity.

 

Goldcorp, the prior operator of the Project, engaged in forums with government and community stakeholders, and submitted an official opinion regarding this ANP declaration to the government, with the objective of ensuring that if an ANP was created, the Camino Rojo Project would not be restricted from development. Since the time that the proposal to create this ANP was first published in the Official Gazette of the Federation, there has been no formal Federal actions regarding the proposal. On 12 June 2018 the Comisión Legislativa de Ecología y Medio Ambiente (Legislative Commission on Ecology and Environment) of the Zacatecas State Legislature voted 15 to 10 against approval of a resolution exhorting the Federal Executive branch to approve the ANP (Gaceta Parlamentaria, 2018; El Sol, 2018). The Zacatecas State Governor and the Municipal Presidents (Mayors) of Mazapil, Francisco R. Murguía, Melchor Ocampo, Concepción del Oro, El Salvador and Villa de Cos formally communicated their opposition to the resolution and creation of the ANP. If a designation of this ANP by the government includes the surface of the mining concession areas or ancillary work areas such as possible water well fields of Camino Rojo, this could limit the growth and continuity of the Project.

 

ANPs are generally divided into sub-zones in which the execution of different activities is allowed or prohibited in accordance with the sub-zone's characteristics. “Core zones” are established with the objective of preserving the present ecosystems in the long term and may be controlled through designation of restricted use or through special protections.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-12

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

“Buffer zones” are intended to regulate exploitation activities under a sustainable development scheme through different uses such as human settlement or sustainable natural resources exploitation (the ANPs may include other sub-zones for different land uses, agricultural, recreational, restoration, among others).

 

Mining activities (including both exploration and exploitation), depending on the corresponding sub-zone may be carried out provided they are authorized by CONANP (National Commission on Protected Natural Areas), without prejudice of other authorizations required for their execution.

 

Creation of the proposed ANP is within the authority of the Federal branch of government, however local government opinions from both State and Municipal levels have political influence on the Federal decision. Because the State and Municipal governments affected by the Camino Rojo Project have formally expressed opposition to creation of the ANP in the area of the Camino Rojo Project, the author believes the permitting risk is similar to that of any mining project of similar scope in North America.

 

4.6.4 Security Risks

 

Drug related violence, propagated by members of criminal cartels and directed against other members of criminal cartels, has occurred in the region and has affected local communities. The aggression is not directed at mining companies operating in the region and has not affected the ability of Orla or previous operators to explore the Camino Rojo Project.

 

4.7 Royalties

 

Newmont has a 2% NSR on all metal production from the Camino Rojo Project, except for metals produced under the sulphide joint venture option stipulated in the acquisition agreement.

 

A 0.5% royalty is payable to the Mexican government as an Extraordinary Mining Duty, mandated by Federal Law.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

4.0 Property Description and Location

Page 4-13

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

 

5.1 Accessibility

 

The Camino Rojo project is located in the Municipality of Mazapil, State of Zacatecas, Mexico, situated along a wide, flat valley near the village of San Tiburcio on Mexican Highway 54, a well-maintained, paved highway providing southbound access to the major city of Zacatecas in Zacatecas State, a distance of 203km, as well as northbound towards Monterrey in Nuevo Leon, a distance of 261km (Figure 5-1). Both of these cities have airports with regularly scheduled flights south to Mexico City or north to the U.S.A. The Project is located 48 km S-SW of the nearest population center with basic services, the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont’s Peñasquito Mine.

 

There are numerous gravel roads within the property linking the surrounding countryside with the two highways, Highways 54 and 62, which transect the property. There are very few locations within the property that are not readily accessible by four-wheel drive vehicle.

 

The project area is centered at approximately 244150E 2675900N UTM NAD27 Zone 14N.

 

All geographic references in this report utilize UTM Zone 14N datum NAD27 unless otherwise stated.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

5.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, and Physiography

Page 5-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 5-1 Project Location and Regional Infrastructure

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

5.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, and Physiography

Page 5-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

5.2 Physiography, Climate and Vegetation

 

The broad valley around San Tiburcio is bounded to the north by the low rolling hills of Sierra La Arracada and Sierra El Barros, to the east by Sierra La Cucaracha, and to the south by the Sierra Los Colgados. The terrain is generally flat. Bedrock exposures are rare, limited to road cuts, borrow pits or creek beds. The elevations within the property range from approximately 1,850 to 2,460 masl and relief is low.

 

The climate is typical of the high-altitude Mesa Central, dry and semi-arid. Annual precipitation for the area is approximately 337mm, mostly during the rainy season in July, August, and September. Temperatures commonly range from +30° to 12°C in the summer and 24° to -6°C in the winter. Exploration and production activities can be conducted year-round.

 

The vegetation is dominated by the scrub bushes creosote bush and tar bush, with lesser cacti, maguey, sage and coarse grasses with rare yucca (Figure 5-2). The natural vegetation is used to locally graze domestic livestock, principally goats. Wild fauna is not abundant but several varieties of birds, rabbits, coyote, lizards, and snakes inhabit the area.

 

 

Figure 5-2 View of Typical Topography and Vegetation at Camino Rojo

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

5.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, and Physiography

Page 5-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

5.3 Local Resources and Infrastructure

 

There is a good network of road and rail services in the region. Road access to most of the property is possible via numerous gravel roads from both Highways 54 and 62. In addition, there is a railway approximately 40 km east of San Tiburcio that crosses both highways (Figure 5-1). There is a high voltage power line transecting the property near San Tiburcio. MCR has requested CENACE to study the availability of power from the national grid and to advise the company as to where a connection to the grid may be permitted.

 

The Project site is generally flat with adequate space for development of mining and processing facilities. Surface rights over the Project area are subject to a Previous to Expropriation Occupation Agreement (COPE), as described in Section 4.0. This agreement provides the surface rights required to develop the Project, including access from the adjoining highway.

 

Prior operators purchased ground water from owners of local wells and trucked the water to site for drilling needs. On 24 February 2015 Camino Rojo SA de CV acquired subsurface water rights totaling 9,695,900 m3 per annum for industrial use. These water rights were subsequently transferred to Minera Peñasquito SA de CV and then assigned to MCR. Registration of the water rights titles in the name of MCR is in process with the Federal water authority (CONAGUA). The water rights acquired by Minera Camino Rojo grant permission to construct and extract water from 26 wells in the Project area. Four water wells were constructed by prior operators of the Project. Pump test results from well CR-01 were indicative that significant water production is feasible from structural zones within the Caracol Formation, but additional test borings in 2018 and 2019 failed to encounter significant water in the Caracol Formation. In 2019 MCR constructed and tested two additional wells, one of which was highly productive, producing water from the Cuesta del Cura Formation. Orla’s hydrogeologic consultants believe that the wells built in 2019 are adequate to meet projected Project water needs of 24 L/s average demand (Barranca Group, 2019).

 

Most exploration and operating supplies may be purchased in the nearby historic mining cities of Zacatecas, Fresnillo and Saltillo. Experienced mining personnel are available locally and from nearby mining towns of Concepciòn del Oro and Mazapil.

 

Potential waste disposal areas, heap leach pad areas, process plant sites and infrastructure facilities are discussed in Sections 16.0, 17.0 and 18.0.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

5.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, and Physiography

Page 5-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

6.0 HISTORY

 

6.1 Prior Ownership

 

The mining concessions comprising the Camino Rojo property were originally staked to the benefit of Canplats de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of Canplats Resources Corporation (Canplats), in 2007. In 2010, Goldcorp acquired 100% of the concession rights from Canplats. Orla acquired the Project from Goldcorp in 2017.

 

6.2 Prior Exploration

 

The Camino Rojo gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit was discovered in mid-2007, approximately 45 km southwest of Concepcion del Oro, and was originally entirely concealed beneath post-mineral cover in a broad, low relief alluvial valley adjacent to the western flank of the Sierra Madre Oriental. Mineralized road ballast, placed on a dirt road near San Tiburcio, Zacatecas, was traced to its source by geologists Perry Durning and Bud Hillemeyer from La Cuesta International, working under contract to Canplats. A shallow pit excavated through a thin veneer of alluvium, located adjacent to a stock pond (Represa), was the discovery exposure of the deposit. Following a rapid program of surface pitting and trenching for geochemical samples, Canplats Resources began concurrent programs of surface geophysics (resistivity and induced polarization) and RC drilling in late 2007, which continued into 2008.

 

The initial drilling was focused on a 450m x 600m gold in rock geochemical anomaly named the Represa zone. Core drilling began in 2008. The geophysical survey defined two principal areas of high chargeability: one centred on the Represa zone and another 1km to the west named the Don Julio zone. The elevated chargeability zones were interpreted as large volumes of sulphide mineralized rocks. Drilling by Canplats, and later drilling by Goldcorp, confirmed the presence of extensive sulphide mineralization at depth in the Represa zone, and much lower quantities of sulphide minerals at Don Julio.

 

By August of 2008, Canplats drilled a total of 92 RC, and 30 diamond-core holes, for a total of 23,988 and 16,044 metres respectively, mainly focused in the Represa zone. The surface access and permission to continue drilling were cancelled in early August 2008, by the ejido of San Tiburcio, Zacatecas. Nevertheless, in November 2008, Canplats published an independent Mineral Resource estimate for the Represa zone, as discussed in Section 6.4 of this report.

 

In October 2009 Canplats publicly released a Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Project (Blanchflower K. K., 2009) which has been superseded by later work and technical studies, and is no longer current and accordingly should not be relied upon.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

5.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, and Physiography

Page 6-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Canplats was acquired by Goldcorp in early 2010. Validation, infill, condemnation, and expansion drilling began in January 2011. By the end of 2015, a total of 279,788 metres of new core drilling in 415 drillholes and 20,569 metres of new RC drilling in 96 drillholes was completed in the Represa and Don Julio zones and their immediate surroundings. An additional 31,286 metres of shallow RAB-style, RC drilling in 306 drillholes was completed, with most of the RAB drilling testing other exploration targets within the concession. Airborne gravity, magnetic and TEM surveys were also carried out, the results of which are in the archives of Minera Camino Rojo.

 

As of the end of 2015 a total of 295,832 metres in 445 diamond core holes, 44,557 metres in 188 RC drillholes, and 31,286 metres of RAB drilling had been completed.

 

Locations of historical drillholes and the Project claim boundaries are summarized in Figure 6-1.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

5.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, and Physiography

Page 6-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 6-1 Historical Drillhole Locations and Project Claim Boundaries

 

Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource tabulations for Camino Rojo were publicly disclosed by Goldcorp as recently as 30 June 2016, as discussed in Section 6.4 of this report. The methodology of Goldcorp’s Mineral Resource estimations has not been disclosed and Dr. Gray has not confirmed the validity of the estimate, thus the Goldcorp estimates are regarded as historical estimates only, as discussed in Section 6.4 of this report and have since been replaced by current Mineral Resource estimates.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

5.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, and Physiography

Page 6-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

6.3 Historical Metallurgical Studies

 

Canplats and Goldcorp conducted metallurgical tests which are discussed in Section 13.0 of this report.

 

6.4 Historical Resource Estimates

 

6.4.1 Canplats

 

Minorex Consulting Ltd. prepared a Mineral Resource estimate for Canplats in 2009 (Blanchflower J., 2009) that was publicly disclosed in a Technical Report prepared in accordance with the disclosure standards of NI 43-101. However, since the effective date of the Mineral Resource estimate, significant additional drillhole data has become available, rendering the 2009 estimate obsolete. The 2009 resource estimate is historical in nature, has not been verified by the authors and should not be relied upon. Orla is not treating the historical estimate as a current estimate.

 

6.4.2 Goldcorp

 

Goldcorp publicly disclosed Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resources on Camino Rojo with an effective date of 30 June 2016 (Goldcorp, 2017) which is no longer current. The key assumptions, parameters, and methods used by Goldcorp to prepare the historical estimate are unknown. The 2016 reserve and resource estimates are historical in nature, have not been verified by the author, and should not be relied upon. Orla is not treating these historical estimates as current estimates.

 

Current Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates are reported in Sections 14 and 15, respectively, in this Technical Report.

 

6.5 Prior Production

 

There has been no recorded mineral production from the property. Surface gravels have been used for road material and a shallow excavation made for gravel extraction created the discovery exposure of the Camino Rojo deposit.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

5.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, and Physiography

Page 6-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

7.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION

 

7.1 Sources of Information

 

The following geological discussion is derived from a variety of peer-reviewed professional papers focused on the regional geology (Mitre-Salazar, 1989) (Centeno-Gracia, 2005) (Aranda-Gomez, 2006) (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007) (Loza-Aguirre I. N., 2008) (Tristán-González, 2009) (Barboza-Gudiño, 2010) (Weiss, 2010) (Ortega-Flores, 2015) (Cruz-Gámez, 2017), a Master’s of Science thesis from the University of Nevada-Reno that details the deposit geology (Sanchez, 2017), geologic maps published by the Servicio Geologico Mexicano, field and diamond drill core observations by Dr. Matthew Gray (Gray M. D., 2016) (Gray M. D., 2018) and Dr. Anthony Longo (Longo, 2017) (Longo, A.A., Edwards, J., 2017), and regional stratigraphy from previously published Technical Reports (Blanchflower K. K., 2009).

 

7.2 Regional Geology

 

The Camino Rojo deposit is located beneath a broad pediment of Tertiary and Quaternary alluvium (Figure 7-1) along the boundary between the Mesa Central physiographic province and the Sierra Madre Oriental fold and thrust belt near the pre-Laramide continental-margin. Oldest rocks are Triassic metamorphic continental rocks overlain by Early to Middle Jurassic red beds. Upper Jurassic to Upper Cretaceous marine facies rocks overlie the red beds at a disconformity and comprise a package of shelf carbonate rocks comprising the Zuloaga to Cuesta del Cura Formations and the basin-filling flysch sediments of the Indidura and Caracol Formations (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007), (Ortega-Flores, 2015). The deposit lies within the southern extent of the northwest striking San Tiburcio fault zone (Weiss, 2010).

 

A Permo-Triassic tectono-volcanic arc in the eastern Sierra Madre Oriental represents the first Pacific-directed subduction and tectonism in Central Mexico (Centeno-Gracia, 2005). Erosion of the eastern Triassic highlands shed siliciclastic material westward and turbidites off the continental shelf into the Triassic basin plains. These marine clastic rocks, the Triassic Zacatecas and El Alamar Formations (Cruz-Gámez, 2017) were subsequently metamorphosed to phyllites and schists (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007) then eroded before continental siliciclastic rocks or red beds were deposited atop an angular unconformity in Early Jurassic (Nazas Formation and later La Joya Formation) (Barboza-Gudiño, 2010). A disconformity atop Lower Jurassic continental rocks preceded deposition of marine carbonate rocks belonging to the Zuloaga and La Caja Formations in Late Jurassic. Following a cessation of volcanism, arc magmatism flared up in the west along the Guerrero arc and continued through Late Cretaceous. Deposition of the shelf carbonate rocks progressed into Early Cretaceous with Taraises, Cupido, La Peña and Cuesta del Cura Formations. Upper Cretaceous flysch sediments derived from the erosion of the western Guerrero arc were deposited in the back-arc basin atop the carbonate rocks. The Mesozoic marine sediments were deformed during the Laramide orogeny from Late Cretaceous to Paleocene forming the Sierra Madre Oriental fold and thrust belt (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007).

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

By late Paleocene, northeast of Mesa Central, a flexural bend in the fold and thrust belt deflected the Mesozoic strata into a series of west- and northwest-trending fold axes and faults (Tristán-González, 2009). South of the westward deflection, the fold belt strikes south to southeast. By early Eocene, the initial pulse of extensional tectonics produced north-northeast to north-northwest normal and strike-slip faults that bound mountain ranges (Matehuala fault zone) and deformed the southeast-trending fold belt along the eastern boundary of Mesa Central (Loza-Aguirre I. N., 2008). By middle Eocene, ranges in the fold and thrust belt were displaced and truncated by northwest-striking high angle faults that translated through the Mesa Central and feature both normal and strike-slip displacement (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007) (Tristán-González, 2009). Subsequent pulses of extension occurred from early Oligocene to Miocene and Pliocene to Quaternary that reactivated existing faults in conjunction with basaltic fissure volcanism and isolated monogenetic basaltic cinder cones (Aranda-Gomez, 2006).

 

The northwest faults include two major fault systems that localized middle Eocene to Oligocene magmatic activity and define the southern and northern boundaries of Mesa Central. The southern fault zone known as the San Luis-Tepehuanes fault system separates the Sierra Madre Occidental from Mesa Central and localizes numerous mineral deposits (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007) (Loza-Aguirre I. N., 2008). The northern fault zone known as the San Tiburcio lineament and fault zone extends for more than 185km and features both left-lateral strike-slip and normal displacement (Mitre-Salazar, 1989). The fault truncates west-trending anticlinal axes in the flexural bend of the Sierra Madre Oriental and may crosscut the NNE-trending Matehuala fault zone that bounds the eastern Mesa Central. Anticlinal fold axes and faults parallel the San Tiburcio fault zone, and granitic intrusive rocks and dacitic to andesitic dikes are localized along portions of its extensive strike length.

 

Mineralization styles in the region include polymetallic and copper-gold skarn and limestone manto (replacement) silver-lead-zinc sulphide ores. The nearest significant producing mines or past producers are Newmont’s Peñasquito mine, located 53km N-NW of Camino Rojo, and various mines of the Concepcion del Oro district, 47km N-NE of Camino Rojo. The Peñasquito mine exploits gold-silver-lead-zinc mineralization hosted in igneous diatreme-breccia and the surrounding Caracol Formation. Peñasquito mineralization gives way at depth to copper-gold sulphide breccias in garnet skarn, within limestone beneath the Caracol Formation (Rocha-Rocha, 2016). Concepcion del Oro mines produced from polymetallic and copper-gold skarn deposits and limestone-hosted manto (replacement) silver-lead-zinc sulphide deposits adjacent to Late Eocene igneous intrusions (Buseck, 1966). Dr. Gray has not verified this information and the mineralization described for the mines and mineral deposits in this section is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization at the Camino Rojo, Zacatecas property.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 7- 1 Regional Geologic Map (Servicio Geológico Mexicano, 2000)

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

7.3 Local Geology

 

7.3.1 General Deposit Geology

 

Camino Rojo is a gold-silver-zinc-lead deposit concealed below shallow (<1 to 3 m) alluvial cover in a large pediment along the southwest border of the Sierra Madre Oriental (Weiss, 2010). Small water storage pits and trenches expose a portion of the oxide deposit in the discovery area known as the Represa zone (i.e., water reservoir). The Late Cretaceous Caracol Formation is the primary host to mineralization, and at depth, the upper Indidura Formation is a minor host near the Caracol contact. The local geology is summarized in Figure 7-2. The deposit stratigraphy, known from current diamond drilling, is discussed below from oldest to youngest.

 

Early Cretaceous Cuesta del Cura Formation features thin- to medium-bedded grey limestone with wavy laminations and locally discontinuous layers of black shale and chert. Polymetallic replacement manto-type occurrences are typically found in Cuesta del Cura elsewhere in the region. No significant mineralization has been found in these limestones at Camino Rojo. Late Cretaceous Indidura Formation features thin-bedded calcareous shale, grey shaley limestone and siltstone with estimated thicknesses that range from 100 to 220 metres (Figure 7-3). Atop the Indidura, the Caracol Formation consists of thinly interlayered carbonaceous and calcareous siltstones, silty mudstones, and fine-grained calcareous sandstone, and thicknesses range from 600 to 800 metres (Figure 7-4). Sandstone layers typically display cross-laminations, and the lowest occurrence of sandstone is considered the Indidura contact (Sanchez, 2017). Camino Rojo vein-style mineralization has not been found to extend below the Indidura into the Cuesta del Cura Formation, although drilling is sparse. The few drill holes that have penetrated below Indidura discovered marbleized limestone and slight calc-silicate hornfels alteration in the Cuesta del Cura Formation (Figure 7-5).

 

Three genetically different types of igneous dikes intruded the Cretaceous marine sediments at Camino Rojo. Type 1 dikes are medium- to coarse-grained porphyritic hornblende-biotite-feldspar porphyry. Type 2 dikes are fine-grained with rare quartz phenocrysts (1-2mm diameter). Type 3 dikes have coarse-grained hornblende with plagioclase (Sanchez, 2017). The dikes consistently display hydrothermal alteration so the actual petrologic and chemical compositions are unknown. They are assumed as intermediate composition igneous dikes (Sanchez, 2017). Drill-supported models created by Orla show dikes are oriented in two parallel subvertical northeast-trending planes spatially associated with the deposit shape. Ore stage IS veins crosscut the dikes and feature bleached halos of sericite alteration.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 7- 2 Local Geology, Camino Rojo Deposit (Servicio Geológico Mexicano, 2014)

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 7-3 shows relatively uniform nature of siltstone and shale beds in Indidura Formation, stratigraphically below Caracol Formation. Indidura is distinguished from Caracol by the absence of rhythmic sandstone-shale beds. Interval from 817.5 to 819.0m assayed 18 ppb Au.

 

 

Figure 7-3 Drillcore from CR12-345D, 818m

 

Figure 7-4 shows typical and diagnostic interbedded centimetre scale sandstone, siltstone, and shale beds, fining upward turbiditic sequence, in unoxidized Caracol Formation. Sample assayed less than 5 ppb Au. Stratigraphic top is to right.

 

 

Figure 7-4 Drillcore from CR12-345D, 254m

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 7-5 shows marbleized Cuesta del Cura limestone, stratigraphically below the Indidura Formation. Interval from 991.5 to 993.0m assayed 44 ppb Au.

 

 

Figure 7-5 Drillcore from CR12-345D, 993m

 

7.3.2 Structural Setting

 

The Camino Rojo deposit is situated within the northwest-striking San Tiburcio fault zone that features both left-lateral strike-slip and normal displacement (Mitre-Salazar, 1989) (Weiss, 2010). Anticlinal fold axes and faults parallel the San Tiburcio fault zone lending credence to a possible 15 km wide zone, encompassing Camino Rojo, which experienced extensional deformation. The deposit has a northeast trend that plunges southwest. Intermediate composition dikes localized within the deposit also strike northeast.

 

7.3.3 Mineralized Zones

 

Three stages of mineralization have been observed in the Camino Rojo deposit, and two types of high-grade mineralization (Longo, 2017) (Longo, A.A., Edwards, J., 2017).

 

Stage 1 K-metasomatism (adularia?)-pyrite - K-metasomatism with disseminated pyrite replaced the mudstone, siltstone and fine-grained sandstones in the Caracol. Mineralization is typically low grade gold with 0.1-0.4 g/t (Figure 7-6, Figure 7-7).

 

Stage 2 Intermediate Sulphidation (IS) veins – IS veins with pyrite-arsenopyrite-sphalerite±galena, calcite and minor quartz. Moderate to high grade gold (0.4 to +4.0 g/t), high zinc grades (0.5 to >2.0% Zn) and high values of As, Pb and Ba, with variable Ag. Sanchez (2017) reports electrum and acanthite in Stage 2.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

IS Type 1 are pyrite-sphalerite-calcite veins with high values of Au-Zn-Ba, and low to moderate values of As, low Sb, and moderate to high Pb (Figure 7-8).

 

IS Type 2 – IS veins with pyrite-arsenopyrite-quartz ±calcite and sphalerite-sulphosalts, high gold (up to 60 g/t), Ag, As, Sb.

 

Stage 3 LS veins – colloform banded quartz veins, drusy-coxcomb quartz veins, and quartz-cemented, polymictic hydrothermal breccia with pyrite-galena-sulphosalts, adularia and electrum. Moderate to high gold grades (2.0 to 15.0 g/t) with high silver (100 to 500 g/t), and high As and Sb values, but variable to low Zn, Pb, and Ba values.

 

At hand specimen scale, mineralization is controlled by bedding and fractures. The sandy and silty beds of the turbidite sequences of the Caracol Formation are preferentially mineralized, with pyrite disseminations and semi-massive stringers hosted within them, presumably due to higher porosity and permeability relative to the enclosing shale beds. Basal layers of the turbiditic sandstone beds are often preferentially mineralized (Figure 7-6, Figure 7-7). Bedding discordant open space filling fractures and structurally controlled breccia zones host banded sulphide veins and sulphide matrix breccias (Figure 7-8, Figure 7-9). Some higher-grade vein and breccia zones are localized along the margins of dikes of intermediate composition.

 

Dr. Gray observed mineralization in drill core over vertical intervals greater than 400 metres, with mineralization occurring in a broad NE-SW trending elongate zone as much as 300m wide and 700m long.

 

Figure 7-6 displays pyrite concentrations developed in basal sandy layer of fining upward sandstone-siltstone-shale/mudstone turbiditic sequence of Caracol Formation. Note textbook turbiditic sequence comprised of cross bedded sandstone above laminar basal sand, and scour marks of basal sand into black pelagic sediments that mark top of lower and base of upper turbidite sequence. Stratigraphic up is to right of photo. Interval from 394.5 to 396.0m assayed 0.211 g/t Au, 8 g/t Ag, 101 ppm Pb, 128 ppm Zn, and 245 ppm As.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-8

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 7-6 Drillcore from CR12 345D, 395m

 

Figure 7-7 shows pyrite concentrations developed in silty and sandy beds of turbiditic sequence of Caracol Formation. Stratigraphic up is to right of photo. Interval from 726.0 to 727.5m assayed 0.109 g/t Au, 1 g/t Ag, 19 ppm Pb, 56 ppm Zn, and 114 ppm As.

 

 

Figure 7-7 Drillcore from CR12 345D, 727m

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 7-8 displays banded pyrite-marmatite (Fe rich sphalerite) carbonate veinlet. Interval from 489.5 to 491m assayed 4.76 g/t Au, 22 g/t Ag, 572 ppm Pb, 16850 ppm Zn, and 7240 ppm As. Surrounding sample intervals without discordant sulphide veinlets assayed only 0.79 and 0.28 g/t Au. Note that sulphide veinlet is nearly parallel to core axis.

 

 

Figure 7-8 Drillcore from CR11 267D, 490m

 

Figure 7-9 illustrates pyrite-marmatite (Fe rich sphalerite) matrix bedding discordant breccia. Interval from 471.5 to 473.0m assayed 1.71 g/t Au, 14 g/t Ag, 411 ppm Pb, 3050 ppm Zn, and 4290 ppm As. Surrounding sample intervals without discordant sulphide veinlets assayed only 0.19 and 0.31 g/t Au.

 

 

Figure 7-9 Drillcore from CR11 267D, 473m

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-10

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

7.3.4 Alteration

 

Distinct alteration styles accompanied each stage of mineralization (Longo, 2017) (Longo, A.A., Edwards, J., 2017):

 

Stage 1 K-metasomatism (adularia? flooding), decarbonization and sulphidation (forming fine-grained pyrite). This alteration assemblage is typically associated with low metal concentrations, except where cut by IS veins, then grades increase. Temperature of this event is unknown and likely not a high temperature (>400 to 700⁰C) event characteristic of K-silicate alteration in porphyry Cu deposits.

 

Stage 2 sericite-calcite ±pyrite-quartz overprints Stage 1 and is associated with pyrite-arsenopyrite and pyrite-sphalerite-galena ore stage veins (Sanchez, 2017). Veins that crosscut the igneous dikes display prominent alteration halos. Sericitic halos to ore stage veins are not visually obvious in the sedimentary rocks with intense K-metasomatism.

 

7.4 Oxidation

 

Oxidation was observed to range from complete oxidation in the uppermost portions of the deposit, generally underlain or surrounded by a zone of mixed oxide and sulphide mineralization where oxidation is complete along fracture zones and within permeable strata, but lacking in the remainder of the rock, which then is generally underlain by a sulphide zone in which no oxidation is observed.

 

Oxidation is ~100%, generally extending from surface to depths of 100m to 150m, and to depths of as much as 400m along fracture zones. The underlying transitional zone of mixed oxide/sulphide extends over a vertical interval in excess of 100m and is characterized by partial oxidation controlled by bedding and structures.

 

The sandy layers of the turbiditic sequence are preferentially oxidized, creating a stratigraphically interlayered sequence of oxide and sulphide material at the centimetre scale (Figure 7-10), with oxidation along structures affecting all strata (Figure 7-11). The partial oxidation of the Caracol Formation preferentially oxidizes the mineralized strata thus incomplete oxidation in the transition zone may result in nearly complete oxidation of the gold bearing portion of the rock, thus the metallurgical characteristics of mixed oxide/sulphide may vary greatly, with some material exhibiting characteristics similar to oxide material.

 

Figure 7-10 displays partially oxidized mineralized Caracol Formation. Note that oxidation is controlled by both bedding and structures. Sandy turbiditic beds are preferentially oxidized in the oxide/sulphide transition zone, whereas interlayered mudstone and shale beds are unoxidized. Oxidation affects all beds adjacent to structures.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 7-10 Drillcore from CR11 258D, 256m 

 

Figure 7-11 shows oxidized Caracol Formation. Interval from 256.5 to 258.0m assayed 3.52 g/t Au, 33 g/t Ag, 6070 ppm Pb, 6060 ppm Zn, and 2590 ppm As. Note the oxidized sulphide veinlet crosscutting bedding, seen below the knife.

 

 

Figure 7-11 Drillcore from CR11 258D, 257m

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-12

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

7.5 Conclusions

 

The distribution of mineralization at Camino Rojo is controlled by both primary bedding and discordant structures. Pervasive, near surface oxidation extends to depths in excess of 100m, and extends to greater depths along structurally controlled zones of fracturing and permeability.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization

Page 7-13

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES

 

The observed geological and geochemical characteristics of the gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit at Camino Rojo are consistent with those of a distal oxidized gold skarn deposit. Characteristics of these deposits (Meinert, L.D., Dipple, G.M., and Nicolescu, S., 2005) are summarized as:

 

· Typically found in lithologies containing some limestone, but deposits not restricted to limestones.
· Formed by regional or contact metamorphic processes by metasomatic fluids, often of magmatic origin.
· Typically zoned deposits with a general pattern of garnet and pyroxene minerals proximal to the mineralizing heat and fluid source, and distal zones of bleaching.
· Low total sulphide content.
· Sulphide mineralogy comprised of pyrite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and galena.
· Highest gold grades are associated with late, relatively lower temperature mineralizing events, often with potassium feldspar and quartz gangue.
· May be transitional to epithermal deposits.

 

The near surface portion of the Camino Rojo deposit has characteristics consistent with those of the distal skarn zone, transitional to epithermal mineralization, and overlies garnet bearing skarn mineralization encountered in the deeper portions of the system.

 

Skarn deposits often exhibit predictable patterns of mineral zoning and metal zoning. Application of skarn zoning models to exploration allows for inferences about the possible lateral and depth extents of the mineralized system at the Camino Rojo deposit and can be used to guide further exploration drill programs.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

8.0 Deposit Types

Page 8-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

9.0 EXPLORATION

 

Orla has conducted reconnaissance geological evaluations of portions of its mining concessions. Exploration activities completed include: geologic mapping; rock chip and soil geochemical sampling; and induced polarization geophysical surveys. As of the effective date of this report, 291.3 line-km of induced polarization geophysical surveys have been completed in 4 separate grids over the known area of mineralization, over the proposed area of infrastructure development, and to the west and south of the resource area. All grids were designed with 400m line separation and stations every 100m. Dipole spacing was selected to search for features at depths greater than 100 to 200m. Chargeability anomalies with some similarities to the Camino Rojo deposit have been identified but not yet drill tested (Figure 9-1).

 

 

Figure 9-1 Chargeability Features, 300m to 400m, from Orla’s 2018 and 2019 IP Survey

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

9.0 Exploration

Page 9-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

A small orientation soil survey has been conducted over the resource area and 66 soil samples were collected. Results from the orientation soil survey over the known deposit area to test for any characteristic signature indicates the geochemical “halo” over the deposit is tightly restricted to sub/outcrop. Anomalous gold (>0.2 g/t) is most closely associated with elevated arsenic (>100 ppm) and zinc (>300ppm). A total of 944 rock chip samples were collected from throughout the mining concessions comprising the Project. Thus far no significant rock chip gold anomalies have been identified.

 

Rock samples collected during the regional exploration are sent to the ALS Minerals (ALS) sample preparation facility in Zacatecas, Mexico. Sample analysis is performed in the ALS laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia. All gold results are obtained by ALS using fire assay fusion and an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish (Au-AA23). All samples are also analysed for multi-elements, including silver, copper, lead, and zinc, using an Aqua Regia (ME-ICP41) digestion.

 

Regional exploration continues to field check interpreted targets, consisting of coincident historical geochemical, airborne geophysical and satellite imagery anomalies. Eight areas of alteration of sedimentary strata have been identified, and although no significant geochemical results have been returned from them to date, they are considered of interest as possible distal alteration zones to mineralized areas. The eight target areas are shown on Figure 9-2 and are: 1) Hacheros, where Indidura Formation limestones and siltstones are bleached and highly fractured with Fe-oxides and carbonate veinlets along fractures; 2) Guanamero, which lies northeast of the Represa Zone, along the trend of mineralization, and hosts recrystallized limestones of the Cuesta del Cura Formation; 3) Chapala, located south of the Represa Zone, where bleached Caracol Formation and recrystallized Indidura Formation is exposed; 4) Pozo de San Juan, which hosts old mining prospects that expose traces of Ag-Pb-Zn mineralization in recrystallized limestones of the Cupido Formation; 5) Majoma, where a polymictic hydrothermal breccia and hematized Caracol Formation are observed; 6) La Lomita, defined by a zone of stockwork fractured and weakly brecciated and hematized Caracol Formation; 7) Puerto de Sigala, where recrystallization and local silicification of Cretaceous limestones is present; and 8) Las Miserias, a zone of structural intersections, cut by intermediate composition dikes, with jasperoid developed in Cretaceous limestones.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

9.0 Exploration

Page 9-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 9-2 Regional Exploration Targets

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

9.0 Exploration

Page 9-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

10.0 DRILLING

 

10.1 General

 

The drillhole database used for the Feasibility Study contains 911 drillholes and 370,566m of drilling. Table 10-1 summarizes the drilling by company, date, and type of drilling. During 2007 and 2008 Canplats drilled 121 holes for 39,831m of drilling, about 11% of the drilling by metres. This was 92 RC holes and 29 core holes. Between 2011 and 2015 Goldcorp drilled 779 holes for 328,587m of drilling. These were 95 RC holes, 306 RAB holes, and 378 core holes. The 2015 holes and some of the late 2014 holes were drilled for geotechnical investigations.

 

Orla drilling included in the resource estimate was conducted during 2018 and consisted of 6 RC holes for 803m of drilling and 5 core holes for 1,345m of drilling, totalling Orla drilling amounted to 11 holes and 2,148m of drilling.

 

Compared with the drilling reported in Section 6.2 of this report, Table 10-1 reports one less Canplats core hole, one less Goldcorp RC hole, and 37 less Goldcorp core holes. It is known that some of the historical drilling in Section 6.2 is well outside the current Project area. The remainder of the historical drilling is included in the current database for the purposes of the Feasibility Study.

 

Table 10-1


Summary of Camino Rojo Drilling, 2007-2018

 

Year Company RC Holes RAB Holes Core Holes Total Holes
Holes Metres Holes Metres Holes Metres Holes Metres
                   
2007 Canplats 12 2,367         12 2,367
2008 Canplats 80 21,621     29 15,843 109 37,464
2007-08 Canplats 92 23,988     29 15,843 121 39,831
2011 Goldcorp 91 18,447 138 10,008 124 54,249 353 82,704
2012 Goldcorp 4 1,116 160 18,514 38 35,606 202 55,236
2013 Goldcorp         134 110,305 134 110,305
2014 Goldcorp     8 2,764 79 75,478 87 78,242
2015 Goldcorp         3 2,100 3 2,100
2011-15 Goldcorp 95 19,563 306 31,286 378 277,738 779 328,587
2018 Orla 6 803     5 1,345 11 2,148
ALL   193 44,354 306 31,286 412 294,926 911 370,566

 

Note: Quantity of drillholes is less than the historical record in Section 6.2. It is known that some of the historical drilling in Section 6.2 is well outside the current Project area. The remainder of the historic drilling is included in the current database.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

10.0 Drilling

Page 10-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 10-1 shows the drillhole locations by drilling type and Figure 10-2 shows the drilling by company. Note that the RAB holes are mostly peripheral to the main mineral deposit area. The denser drilling in the northeast portion of the deposit is the area of interest for the FS. This material is relatively close to the surface and oxidized. To the southwest the mineralization is deeper with higher amounts of sulphide.

 

10.2 Canplats Drilling

 

The Canplats drilling was conducted during 2007 and 2008. It is reported the RC holes were drilled by Tiger Drilling de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and Layne de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Layne). The rigs used drilled holes of either 4.75in or 5.5in (12cm or 14cm) diameter. Most of the core holes are HQ (63.5mm) and drilled by Major Drilling International Inc. Four PQ (85.0mm) holes were drilled to collect metallurgical samples, but only three of them are in the IMC database. Metallurgical holes CRM-006, CRM-014 and CRM-020 included assays for individual sample intervals in the database. CRM-038 was not in the assay database provided to IMC and it is not certain individual assays were available for this hole. Often metallurgical holes are consumed in their entirety for testing purposes.

 

It was reported that Canplats did not do downhole surveys for the RC holes. However, Goldcorp was able to re-enter most of the holes and do the surveys. Most of the Canplats RC holes currently have detailed downhole survey information.

 

Core and RC logging procedures for Canplats drilling were described by Blanchflower (2009). For RC drilling, Canplats sampling personnel extracted spoon size splits from each drill interval at the rig’s cyclone splitter, washed away the fine fraction with a strainer, and placed the washed splits into divided plastic chip trays. Canplats geologists subsequently logged the RC cuttings in the office and storage building, describing each interval on paper log forms with codes for lithology, alteration, mineralization and fracturing. The logged information was later captured into electronic spreadsheet files.

 

Core was logged prior to hydraulic splitting and sampling. Canplats geologists used paper logging forms to record descriptions of colour, lithology, alteration, mineralization, bedding, and fracture and fault angles to the core axis. Descriptions used a combination of alpha-numeric codes and normal text, and included hand-drawn graphic sketches. The logged information was later captured into electronic spreadsheet files for importation in the database.

 

The Canplats drilling discovered and partially delineated the oxide mineral deposit that occurs at the northeast end of the Camino Rojo deposit, in the Represa zone. The drilling also discovered the deeper sulphide deposit to the southwest, in the Don Julio zone. This data was used to develop a Mineral Resource and PEA level study for the Represa zone by Canplats during 2009.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

10.0 Drilling

Page 10-2

 

  

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

10.3 Goldcorp Drilling

 

The Goldcorp drilling was conducted from 2011 to 2015. The RC drilling was conducted by Layne and G4 Drilling. The RC holes were 4.75in to 5.125in in diameter (12cm to 13cm). The core holes were drilled by Layne, BD Drilling, and Boart-Longyear and were generally HQ core. In addition to the core and RC holes, 306 RAB holes were drilled. The average depth of these holes was only about 100m and they were mostly peripheral to the main deposit area. Downhole surveys were conducted for the core and RC drilling, but not for the RAB holes. They were assumed vertical.

 

Most of the holes are orientated north with an approximate 60° north plunge. This is an optimal orientation for the bedding, which dips moderately to the south/southeast. This direction is less optimal for steep north dipping structures and intercepts with narrow veins at low to very low angles to the core axis have been observed in many holes. There are two sections with holes directed to the south drilled by Goldcorp. However, it would be desirable to drill more holes directed south with a 45 to 60° south plunge to intersect structures with a similar attitude as the dike, southwest to northeast trending with a steep north dip. However, these holes require access to ground controlled by the Adjacent Owner.

 

Goldcorp RC chip logging was recorded on paper log forms by Goldcorp geologists at the RC drill sites, concurrent with drilling. Washed fines and chips from each interval were examined and logged, and a spoon-sized split was placed into divided chip trays for future reference. As of the date of this Report, the chip trays are available for inspection. The Goldcorp geologists described and recorded the lithology, alteration, fracture/fault zones, oxidation class, percent oxidation by volume, estimated percent and type of iron oxides, estimated percent sphalerite, galena, pyrite, and other sulphides, calcite, other veins, and colour. Descriptive text and a graphic sketch column were also recorded. These data were later captured into electronic spreadsheet files for importation into the database.

 

Core logging by Goldcorp was carried out on whole core, prior to any core cutting or sampling. All core was brought by Goldcorp personnel to the core logging shelter, rinsed with water, and measured from run blocks to determine core depths contained in each core box. Goldcorp geologists logged lithology, alteration, fracture/fault zones, oxidation class, and percent oxidation by volume. Graphic sketch columns for lithology, bedding, fracture and fault angles to core axes, and mineralization were also recorded. Estimated percentages of sulphide and gangue minerals, as well as their mode of occurrence were recorded as text. Logged information was later captured into electronic spreadsheet files for importation into the database. Core was also photographed prior to splitting. In 2012, the logging was modified to include fields for estimated percentages of various sulphide minerals. During 2010, Goldcorp geologists re-logged the Canplats RC drill cuttings to determine the degree of oxidation of each drill interval in terms of percent oxidation of the rock by volume. The Goldcorp drilling further delineated both the oxide and sulphide Mineral Resources. The oxide portion of the deposit has sufficient drilling to conduct studies at the Feasibility Study level. The sulphide deposit has sufficient drilling to conduct studies at the PEA or Preliminary Feasibility level of study. More drilling would be required for a Feasibility level study.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

10.0 Drilling

Page 10-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

10.4 Orla Drilling

 

BD Drilling of Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico drilled 5 HQ diameter diamond core holes totaling 1,345m. Three holes were drilled for geotechnical investigations and two were drilled to test a possible higher-grade structure proximal to the main resource area. All holes were sampled. Core logging by Orla personnel was conducted on unsplit whole core. Lithology, structure, alteration, oxidation, and mineralization data was recorded on paper drill logs, then transcribed into an electronic database. RQD and core recovery information was similarly captured. Drillcore was photographed prior to sampling.

 

Layne of Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico drilled 6 RC holes totaling 803.1m. A 5 ¼” (13.34 cm) diameter face return bit with shroud was used. RC chips were logged by Orla geologists. Lithology, alteration, oxidation, and mineralization data was recorded on paper drill logs, then transcribed into an electronic database. Drill cuttings were sampled by splitting the sample at the drill rig with a cyclone, or in the case of wet samples, with a rotary splitter. Depending on recovery, a ½ or ¼ split was sent for assay and the remaining sample preserved and stored in warehouses in San Tiburcio.

 

Gyroscopic downhole surveys were completed for both diamond core and reverse circulation drillholes by Silver State Surveys Inc., supported by their Concepcion del Oro, Zacatecas office. The Orla drilling included in the resource model database, as of the effective date of this report, was conducted in 2018 and is summarized in Table 10-2.

 

Table 10-2


Drillholes by Orla Included in Mineral Resource Model Database

 

Drillhole Type Core Size Depth (m) Azimuth Inclination E UTM NAD27 N UTM NAD27 Elevation (m) Start Date Finish Date Drill Contractor
CRDH18-001 DDH HQ 250.00 160 -45 243402.68 2675882.93 1955.37 20180804 20180812 BD Drilling
CRDH18-002 DDH HQ 369.00 155 -50 243695.74 2676093.77 1952.46 20180809 20180812 BD Drilling
CRGT18-001 DDH HQ 250.00 135 -65 244145.55 2676170.38 1946.56 20180705 20181711 BD Drilling
CRGT18-002 DDH HQ 240.00 205 -70 244342.02 2676141.77 1948.36 20180712 20180718 BD Drilling
CRGT18-003 DDH HQ 236.00 50 -80 244534.84 2676143.32 1944.52 20180719 20180726 BD Drilling
CRI18-01 RC   100.58 0 -90 244142.42 2676045.35 1944.57 20180822 20180822 BD Drilling
CRI18-02 RC   100.58 180 -50 244142.24 2676043.36 1944.58 20180822 20180823 Layne
CRI18-03 RC   100.58 180 -70 244081.44 2676021.81 1945.36 20180823 20180824 Layne
CRI18-04 RC   100.58 0 -50 244046.99 2676178.62 1946.97 20180824 20180825 Layne
CRI18-05 RC   100.58 0 -90 244098.29 2676239.08 1947.77 20180825 20180825 Layne
CRI18-06 RC   300.23 180 -70 244203.57 2676197.94 1947.18 20180826 20180827 Layne

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

10.0 Drilling

Page 10-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

In addition to Orla drilling used in the Mineral Resource model database, through the effective date of this report, Orla has completed geotechnical, metallurgical, condemnation and water exploration and development drilling totalling 11,331 metres as summarized in Table 10-3. Orla has not yet conducted any drilling to explore for new mineralized zones.

 

Table 10-3


Non-Resource Drilling Completed by Orla, 2018 and 2019

 

Purpose

Drillhole

Type

Total

Number of

Holes

Total m
Clay Exploration DDH 5 56.00
Condemnation RC 7 1,767.85
Geotech Infrastructure Substrate DDH 19 323.35
Geotech/Condemnation DDH 4 642.00
Metallurgy DDH 14 2,288.50
Monitoring Wells RC/rotary 3 197.41
Water Exploration RC 16 5,340.51
Water Production RC/rotary 2 715.60
  Total 70 11,331.22

 

The clay exploration drilling indicated that clay required for leach pad and pond construction is present in adequate amounts. The condemnation holes verified that the proposed sites for Project infrastructure will not impede development of Mineral Resources. The geotechnical holes provided the information necessary to determine pit slope stabilities and design criteria for the process plant, leach pad, waste dumps, and ponds, and confirmed that the proposed locations for each are suitable. Metallurgical drillholes provided material for testing as described in Section 13.0 of this report. The water exploration, monitoring, and development drilling provided information needed for hydrologic modeling as described in Section 24.3 of this report and indicated that wells at the Project site can provide an adequate water supply to the Project as described in Section 18.3.1 of this report.

 

10.5 Sampling

 

10.5.1 Canplats and Goldcorp Sampling

 

Goldcorp sample intervals were consistently 1.5m for core, RC, and RAB drilling. For Canplats RC drilling about 20% of the sample intervals were 1.0m and 80% 2.0m intervals. Canplats core samples tended to be 2.0m intervals, but about 30% of the intervals were shorter and of random length. According to the Canplats 2009 Technical Report, the geologist could adjust the sample intervals to correspond with geologic contacts.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

10.0 Drilling

Page 10-5

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

For the RC drilling by Canplats and Goldcorp a splitter was used at the drill rig and the sample collected in the field. For drillcore, both Canplats and Goldcorp split the samples at secure facilities and bagged them for shipment to the sample preparation laboratories.

 

There is no recovery information for Canplats drilling or for any of the RC or RAB drilling. The recovery for Goldcorp core was very high, generally above 90% and the overall average was about 96%.

 

10.5.2 Orla Sampling

 

Drillcore was sampled by cutting the core with a diamond disk saw and sending ½ of the core for assay and maintaining ½ of the core in the core box for archive. Sample intervals were generally 1.5m long, except where geologic contacts or lack of recovery required a different sample length. Sampling was conducted in secure facilities at the Project core logging facility in San Tiburcio.

 

For reverse circulation drilling, imperial unit drill rods were used, thus sample intervals were 1.524m long (5 feet). Sampling was conducted at the drill rig, and samples then transported to secure warehouse facilities in San Tiburcio.

 

10.6 Conclusions

 

10.6.1 IMC Conclusion

 

It is the opinion of IMC that the drilling and sampling procedures for Camino Rojo drill samples by Canplats and Goldcorp are reasonable and adequate for the purposes of the FS. IMC does not know of any drilling, sampling, or recovery factors that would materially impact the accuracy and reliability of the results that are included in the database used for Mineral Resource estimation.

 

Analytical work comparing various drilling campaigns and drilling types indicates potential down hole contamination in some of the wet Canplats RC drilling. This is discussed in more detail in Section 12.1.1.3. The suspect sample intervals were not used for the resource modeling for this report. This impacted about 2100m, or about 5%, of the Canplats drilling.

 

10.6.2 RGI Conclusion

 

It is the opinion of RGI that the 2018 drilling and sampling procedures for Camino Rojo drill samples by Orla are reasonable and adequate for the purposes of the FS. RGI does not know of any drilling, sampling, or recovery factors related to 2018 drilling that would materially impact the accuracy and reliability of results that are included in the database used for Mineral Resource estimation.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

10.0 Drilling

Page 10-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 10-1 Drilling by Type, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

10.0 Drilling

Page 10-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 10-2 Drilling by Company, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

10.0 Drilling

Page 10-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY

 

11.1 Sample Preparation

 

The sampling and analysis were supervised by the geological staff of Canplats for 2007 and 2008 drilling, by Goldcorp for 2011 through 2014 drilling, and by Orla for 2018 drilling.

 

ALS Chemex has been the primary assay laboratory used for the routine assaying of surface and drill samples for the Canplats, Goldcorp, and Orla drilling/sampling programs. All of the assays have been done at the ALS Chemex laboratory in North Vancouver, British Columbia, certified under ISO 9001: 2000, and 2008, and accredited under ISO 17025:2005. ALS Chemex is independent of each of Canplats, Goldcorp, and Orla.

 

The Canplats samples were prepared for assaying at the ALS Chemex sample preparation laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico. Most of the Goldcorp samples were prepared at the ALS Chemex sample preparation laboratory in Zacatecas, Mexico. However, during 2013 and 2014 samples were also sent to the ALS Chihuahua facility and the ALS Guadalajara preparation lab as well as the Zacatecas facility. Orla samples were prepared at the ALS Chemex facility in Zacatecas.

 

Upon receipt at the sample preparation labs the samples were dried, crushed in their entirety to >70% passing a 2mm screen. The crushed material was riffle split to extract an approximate 250-gram sub-sample that was pulverized to >85% passing 75 microns in a disc pulveriser. This sample preparation procedure is the standard ALS Chemex “PREP-31” procedure. Each of the 250-gram pulps were riffle split into two sealed paper sample envelopes, with one split air-shipped to the ALS Chemex assay facility in North Vancouver. The second split was returned to the property for storage. The same sample preparation procedure was used for core and RC chips.

 

11.2 Analyses

 

The core and RC samples collected by Canplats and Goldcorp, and Orla, as well as the surface pit and trench samples collected by Canplats, were assayed with the same analytical methods and at the same laboratory, the ALS Chemex facility in North Vancouver, British Columbia. For gold, all were assayed using the Au-AA23 30-gram fire assay fusion, with Atomic Absorption finish. A total of 33 other elements were determined by four-acid sample digestion followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES). This is ALS Chemex method code ME-ICP61. The elements assayed by ICP-AES are Ag, Al, As, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, K, La, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, S, Sb, Sc, Sr, Th, Ti, Tl, U, V, W, and Zn.

 

Over-limits for gold were automatically re-assayed with 30-gram fire assay fusion with gravimetric finish (method code Au-GRA21). Over-limits for silver, copper, lead and zinc were automatically performed by four acid digestion of the sample followed by analysis by ICP-AES. This is ALS Chemex method code ME-OG62 for ore grade samples.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

11.0 Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security

Page 11-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

RAB-style RC samples from 2011 to 2014 were analysed at ALS Chemex using method code ME-MS61m, which employs the same four-acid digestion, and a combination of ICP-AES, mass-spectrometry, and cold-vapour Atomic Absorption to determine 48 elements plus mercury. Most of the RAB holes are peripheral to the main deposit area.

 

11.3 QA/QC Programs

 

11.3.1 Canplats QA/QC Program

 

It is reported that the Canplats Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QA/QC) program was based on the insertion of control samples at a target rate of 5% to the assay laboratory (Blanchflower, 2009). A quality control sample was to be inserted randomly within every 20 consecutive samples, alternating between standard, blank or duplicate samples. The standard and blank samples were inserted into the sample sequence as the sample shipment was being readied. Duplicate samples were inserted into the sample sequence at the time of collection (Blanchflower, 2009). As reported by Blanchflower (2009) the final, compiled database for 2007 and 2008 drilling included 2,165 blanks and standards, and 1,078 field duplicates. However, relatively few of the Canplats QA/QC samples (about three holes) are included in the current database. IMC believes the Canplats drilling is adequately verified by the Goldcorp drilling results. Based on 5m composite there are 673 Canplats composites in 51 different holes that also have Goldcorp composites within 10m. The distributions of the gold values are comparable. This analysis is after the removal of potentially contaminated Canplats RC samples discussed in Section 12.1.1.3.

 

11.3.2 Goldcorp QA/QC Program

 

Goldcorp’s QA/QC program included the use of blanks, standards and field duplicates for all drilling to monitor potential sample numbering issues and contamination during sample preparation, as well as analytical accuracy and precision. The control sample insertion rate was originally targeted at 7%, and Goldcorp personnel inserted all QA/QC samples during sample collection, prior to placing the samples in the storage area for shipment to the laboratory. A blank was inserted every 25 samples and consisted of fragments of unaltered calcareous siltstone and sandstone of the Caracol Formation, from a borrow pit near Tanque Nuevo, Zacatecas, approximately 60km northeast of Camino Rojo. For RC blanks the Caracol material was hand-crushed to coarse gravel size, and for core drilling blanks the material was broken into fragments similar to drill core size. Standards were inserted every 50 samples usually immediately following the blanks. Standards have included the commercial standards CDN-ME-15 and CDN-ME-16, from CDN Resource Laboratories in Vancouver, B.C., and three in-house reference materials, PEN1850OX, PEN1850T and STDCR14-01, all prepared at SGS Minerales in Durango. The first two were prepared from bulk samples of oxide and mixed oxide-sulphide ore from Peñasquito and the latter from Camino Rojo drill core. Field duplicates were inserted every 100th sample, labelled with a “B” suffix to the original sample number. Field duplicates were two ¼’s of the same ½ piece of sawn core. A total of 10,583 control samples were inserted in 2011 through 2013, for a realized control insertion rate of just below 8%.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

11.0 Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security

Page 11-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

A comprehensive compilation and review of Goldcorp’s QA/QC program by Hamilton (2014c) determined that while adequate, the program had several aspects that could be significantly improved through a few simple and easy to implement changes including:

 

· At 8% the overall insertion rate was considered low and that a higher proportion of QA/QC samples, distributed more evenly, were needed.
· Over significant periods of time only a single standard had been used and that several standards should be used on a rotation basis.
· The ¼ core duplicate could not assess variability in the regular samples properly and that the full second half of core should be used instead.

 

Early in 2014 a new QA/QC protocol was adopted where a QA/QC material would be inserted every 10th sample for an improved insertion rate of 10%. Three standards were used in a rotation, alternating with blanks and duplicates such that every 80 samples two blanks, two ½ core duplicates and 4 standards were inserted into the sample sequence.

 

Goldcorp implemented procedures in 2012 for improved follow-up of QA/QC analytical data (Ristorcelli and Ronning, 2012). The project database manager was to review blank and standard assay results as new data was received and loaded into the project master assay table. Standards more than three deviations from the expected values and blanks with gold values greater than 0.020 g/t, or silver values greater than to 1.5 g/t, were reported to the project exploration manager and via email to ALS Chemex for investigation. The exploration manager, database manager and ALS Chemex QA/QC staff communicated to identify the cause of the elevated blank or unexpected standard result. Depending on the cause, the exploration manager ordered appropriate steps as necessary for re-assays, or submission of remaining sample splits for new assays, and instructed the database manager on any changes needed to the assay database.

 

The Goldcorp QA/QC samples were included in the database provided to IMC. IMC has reviewed this data, including developing some independent control charts. It is the opinion of IMC that the Goldcorp QA/QC program met or exceeded industry standards.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

11.0 Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security

Page 11-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

11.3.3 Orla QA/QC Program

 

Throughout the 2018 drilling campaign Orla implemented a quality assurance and quality control program appropriate for an exploration and resource evaluation program. Orla’s QA/QC program included training of project geologists and drillers on proper sampling methods at the drill rig, field visits by the responsible Qualified Person, systematic insertion into the sample stream and assay of blank samples, standards, and duplicate samples.

 

Blank samples were of crushed unmineralized post-mineral volcanic rocks. During the 2018 drill program project geologists inserted blank samples into the sample stream at an interval of one blank sample every 50 samples on regular intervals. A total of 29 blanks were inserted into the sample stream and 19 of the blanks were preceded by a sample containing detectable gold. In 2 of these 19 cases, the blank sample also returned a detectable gold assay. The blank sample that was immediately preceded by the highest-grade drill sample, 5.57 ppm, yielded the highest measured gold concentration of 0.16 ppm. If it is assumed that the blank samples truly are “blank” and do not contain gold above the 0.005 ppm detection limit, then these data are consistent with a slight and immaterial amount of contamination during sample preparation. This possible error is not considered significant.

 

Standards were inserted into the sample stream every 50 samples. Five different standards of different gold grades were used. The standards were prepared and certified by CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Canada and Rocklabs Ltd. of New Zealand. The standards were in the form of pulps and were inserted into the sample stream after the laboratory had completed its sample preparation. Standards ME1401, ME1414, OXC145, OXD127, and OXI121 were used. A comparison of standard assay results from ALS Chemex to the certified assay means for the standards indicates that the assays obtained during the 2018 drilling program are reliable.

 

Field duplicates were inserted into the sample stream at a ratio of one duplicate every 50 samples. Field duplicates consist of a ¼ rig split of the RC drilling chips collected from the same ½ split that yields the sample sent to the lab, or a ¼ sawn split of drill core. Field duplicates were submitted blind to the laboratory, i.e. the lab could not distinguish which samples were field duplicates. Duplicates were submitted as the 5th sample immediately following the original sample. A total of 31 field duplicates were analysed. The field duplicates show high variation compared to originals for both Au and Ag and 10% of rig split duplicates have greater than 60% absolute relative difference in Au assay and 47% absolute relative difference in Ag assay from originals. The variance in gold was further examined by segregating data by drilling method. Both RC and drillcore samples exhibit the same variances of Au.

 

The precision demonstrated by the rig split duplicates is outside of normal ranges observed for disseminated gold deposits. The data indicates the gold and silver distribution is heterogeneous at a local scale. The assay data is adequate for resource estimation purposes, but the estimate of grade at any specific location or particular block within the model will be moderately uncertain, although the global estimate will be reliable.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

11.0 Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security

Page 11-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Preparation duplicates are inserted into the sample stream at a ratio of one duplicate every 100 samples. A total of 15 preparation duplicates were analysed. Preparation duplicates have a low variation compared to originals. 90% of sample preparation duplicates have less than 22% absolute relative difference Au and less than 20% absolute relative difference Ag from originals. The precision demonstrated by the coarse reject duplicates is within normal ranges observed for gold deposits and the data indicates the sampling is reliable and adequate for resource estimation purposes.

 

Assay (lab) duplicates were inserted into the sample stream at a ratio of one duplicate every 100 samples. A total of 12 lab duplicates were analysed. Lab duplicates consist of a repeat analysis of an already prepared and analysed sample pulp. The pulp re-assays show low variance compared to the original assay for both Au and Ag and 90% of laboratory pulp duplicates have less than 13% absolute relative difference Au and less than 10% absolute relative difference Ag from originals. The precision demonstrated by the pulp re-assays is within normal ranges observed for gold deposits and the data indicates the sampling is reliable and adequate for resource estimation purposes.

 

Check assays from an independent lab of the same pulp assayed by ALS have not yet been performed. Bureau Veritas (BV) labs has performed independent assays on a second pulp prepared by ALS and sent out for independent assay for 64 samples. BV gold assays yielded a mean 11.9% higher than the ALS assays. Because the BV assays are of a second pulp, not the same pulp assayed by ALS, no conclusions can be drawn about the repeatability of assays between the labs. It is recommended that 3% of pulps assayed by ALS Chemex are sent to and assayed by another independent laboratory to verify results.

 

It is the opinion of RGI that Orla’s QA/QC program was appropriate for a resource development drill program and the QA/QC program met or exceeded industry standards. Results of analyses of blank, standard, and duplicate samples verify that the analytical results of the 2018 drilling program are reliable and it is the opinion of RGI that the 2018 drillhole assay database is suitable for use for resource estimation.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

11.0 Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security

Page 11-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

11.4 Sample Security

 

11.4.1 Canplats and Goldcorp Sample Security

 

After collection in the field, the Canplats core and RC samples were transported by truck to a secure warehouse in San Tiburcio, a distance of about 5km. After each drill core sample was split in half by sawing and bagged, the sample bags were tied shut with non-slip plastic ties. The sample bags were then moved to a locked storage area in the core logging and storage facility controlled by the company geologists. Prior to shipping, several sample bags were placed into large woven nylon ‘rice’ bags, their contents were marked on each bag, and each bag was securely sealed.

 

The sample bags were delivered directly to the ALS Chemex assay laboratory in Guadalajara, Jalisco State, Mexico by company personnel.

 

During the Goldcorp tenure samples were transported from the field to a secure warehouse and logging area in San Tiburcio, usually twice a day, morning and late afternoon. Sealed individual sample bags of sawn core were loaded into numbered rice sacks which were tied closed and placed in the secure storage building each afternoon. Once or twice a week the sealed sacks were loaded into a delivery truck operated under contract to ALS Chemex and delivered to the preparation labs.

 

Orla took possession of the Goldcorp facility in San Tiburcio. As of this writing the core, many of the assay pulps, and the RC chip trays are stored at this facility. The facility is walled with locked gates.

 

It is the opinion of IMC that the sample preparation, analysis, QA/QC programs and sample security were adequate to ensure the reliability of the drilling database.

 

11.4.2 Orla Sample Security

 

During the 2018 drill campaign, at the end of each drill shift, Orla personnel moved RC cutting samples and drill core to Orla’s secure, locked storage facilities in San Tiburcio. Samples for assay were packaged in shipping sacks and delivered directly to the ALS sample preparation facility in Zacatecas.

 

It is the opinion of RGI that the sample preparation, analysis, QA/QC programs and sample security were adequate to ensure the reliability of the 2018 drilling database.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

11.0 Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security

Page 11-6

 

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

12.0 DATA VERIFICATION

 

12.1 Resource Model Data

 

12.1.1 Canplats and Goldcorp Drill Data

 

12.1.1.1 Assay Data

 

IMC selected 20 holes at random from the Camino Rojo database and compared the database with original assay certificates. The holes were:

 

CR13-459D       CR11-289D       CR12-344D       CR11-332D  
CR13-380D       CR13-428D       CR13-390D       CR13-422D  
BCR-006       BCR-044       BCR-066       CR13-424D  
CR11-266D       BCR-078       CRD-021       CR11-284D  
BCR-011       BCR-019       CR11-305D       CR13-497D  

 

The gold, silver, lead, and zinc assays in the database were compared with the certificates. The checked data amounted to about 7,623 assay intervals.

 

For gold there were minor discrepancies in the certificates versus the database for nine intervals; one in CR11-266D and eight in CR13-380D. The database and certificate values were similar, so the discrepancies are not material. There were also eight discrepancies for silver and zinc and seven discrepancies for lead in hole CR13-380D, generally in the same records as gold. This is an indication that a section of hole CR13-380D might have been re-assayed.

 

There were also 10 discrepancies for silver, lead, and zinc in hole BCR-019. They were the same 10 assay intervals. Again, the certificate and database values were similar, so the discrepancies are not material.

 

Based on the comparisons IMC concluded the database assay values are reliable.

 

12.1.1.2 Collar Locations

 

IMC also compared collar elevations of the drillholes with topography. The elevations were in very good agreement with the exception of 15 holes, mostly on one drill fence, at the south end of the drilling. The holes are not in the resource area and are not material for the present study.

 

Minera Camino Rojo personnel have also re-surveyed many of the drillhole collars to verify the original surveys. IMC believes the collar coordinates of the drillholes are accurate.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

12.0 Data Verification

Page 12-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

12.1.1.3 Canplats RC Data

 

A review of the RC drilling was done. In particular, a report by Mine Development Associates (MDA) dated June 8, 2011 and titled “Camino Rojo – A Comparison of Goldcorp and Canplats Drill Results” indicated potential issues with the Canplats RC drilling. The report concluded that a portion of the RC drilling that was considered wet was probably contaminated and should not be used for Mineral Resource estimates. Contamination in RC drilling occurs when material from higher in the hole falls downward and mixes with samples extracted from lower in the hole.

 

IMC conducted a comparison of the following four population sets based on pairing 5m composites:

 

· Goldcorp core versus all Canplats RC
· Goldcorp core versus dry Canplats RC
· Goldcorp core versus wet Canplats RC
· Canplats dry versus wet RC

 

There was a variable in the database (wet_rc) that classified the RC drilling into dry, humid, and wet. For the Canplats data there were 11,074 assay intervals classified as dry, 375 classified as humid, and 1,638 classified as wet. Humid and wet are lumped for this analysis. Generally, portions of holes are classified as humid or wet, not the entire hole. Also, the wet samples tend to be deeper in the holes for most occurrences. Based on a review of cross sections, most of the wet RC drilling is not in the constrained oxide pit developed for this report.

 

Additional analysis was done with decay analysis and visual review of the assays in the holes. Based on the analysis IMC decided the assay intervals marked as wet or humid for the following 16 holes are potentially contaminated and should not be used for resource modeling:

 

BCR-031       BCR-039       BCR-040       BCR-052  
BCR-069       BCR-080       BCR-010       BCR-028  
BCR-030       BCR-032       BCR-035       BCR-044  
BCR-057       BCR-074       BCR-084       BCR-085  

 

This impacted about 2100m, or about 5%, of the Canplats drilling.

 

It is noted that Goldcorp also drilled several RC holes, but they tend to be outside of the Mineral Resource area of interest for the FS.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

12.0 Data Verification

Page 12-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

IMC is of the opinion that the Camino Rojo drillhole database is acceptable for Preliminary Economic Analysis, Prefeasibility and Feasibility level studies, after the deletion of the potentially contaminated RC samples.

 

12.1.2 Orla Drill Data

 

RGI conducted field reviews during the 2018 drill program to verify drilling and sampling techniques and drillhole collar locations. RGI reviewed: drill methods; drill core; Orla’s drill logs; Orla’s geologic and oxidation database; and Orla’s geological interpretations and model. No discrepancies, inconsistencies, or geologically implausible interpretations were noted. RGI independently evaluated the drill sample assay data, including a comparison of the Project drillhole database against original assay certificates from the 2018 drill program. No unresolved discrepancies were noted and it is the opinion of RGI that the 2018 geologic and drillhole assay database is suitable for use in resource and reserve estimation and for the purpose of the FS.

 

12.1.3 Historical Data Reviews

 

12.1.3.1 Canplats

 

Canplats Resource Corporation issued a Technical Report titled “Preliminary Assessment based on Report Titled ‘Technical Assessment of Camino Rojo Project – Zacatecas Mexico’” with an amended date of November 30, 2009. The report was prepared by Minorex Consulting Ltd., an independent, qualified, consulting group. In Sections 11.0 (Drilling) and 14.0 (Verification) Minorex states that they were responsible for the compilation of the drilling database and that the data included in the database was verified by them.

 

Section 14.0 of the Canplats report also includes detailed description of the QA/QC program for the 2007/8 drilling campaign. In particular, GeoSparks Consulting based in Nanaimo, British Columbia, an independent consulting company, was retained to compile and review all the 2007 and 2008 QA/QC results. This review also included sending 152 samples to another laboratory for check assays. The GeoSparks report concluded that the final assay results for the 2007 and 2008 drilling were of high quality.

 

12.1.3.2 Goldcorp

 

During August 2012, M3 Engineering of Tucson, Arizona (M3) prepared a Pre-Feasibility Study report for the Camino Rojo Project for Goldcorp. The report was titled “Camino Rojo Project – Technical Report – Pre-Feasibility Study – Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated August 17, 2012. This report was prepared in NI 43-101 format but it does not appear it was filed on SEDAR; Camino Rojo was probably not considered a material property for Goldcorp.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

12.0 Data Verification

Page 12-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The resource block model for the M3 study was developed by Mine Development Associates (MDA) of Reno, Nevada. It is reported that MDA did a detailed audit of several aspects of the drilling data including collar locations, downhole deviation surveys, checks of the specific gravity measurements conducted by Goldcorp, and the analytical data. The report notes that MDA checked all the Canplats and Goldcorp assays against original assay certificates for gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc. It is also reported that very few discrepancies were noted in the data.

 

As discussed in Section 12.1.1.3, MDA also did analysis that indicated potential downhole contamination in some of the Canplats wet RC drilling.

 

In addition to IMC’s and RGI’s reviews, there has been considerable review of the Camino Rojo drilling data by companies that were independent of the owners. IMC is of the opinion that the Camino Rojo drillhole database is acceptable for Preliminary Economic Analysis, Prefeasibility and Feasibility level studies.

 

12.2 Metallurgical Test Data

 

KCA checked the metallurgical test procedures and results to ensure they met industry standards. Metallurgical sample locations were reviewed to ensure that there was material from throughout the resource area and that the samples were reasonably representative with regards to material type and grade with the material planned to be processed so as to support the selected process method and assumptions regarding recoveries and costs.

 

12.3 Site Visits by Qualified Persons

 

As detailed in Section 2.4, each of the Qualified Persons for this Report visited the Camino Rojo property and, in regards to data verification, were provided the opportunity to review current and past drill programs, property details and other miscellaneous items in relation to the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

12.0 Data Verification

Page 12-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING

 

Historical metallurgical test work programs on the Camino Rojo Project were commissioned by the prior operators of the Project: Canplats (SGS, 2009; KCA 2010) and Goldcorp (KCA, 2012; KCA 2014, KCA, 2015; Blue Coast 2012, Hazen, 2014; SGS Vancouver, 2015). A confirmatory metallurgical test program was commissioned by Orla (KCA, 2019) to confirm the results and conclusions from the previous campaigns. In total 107 column leach tests (85 on representative samples for the material types and pit area) and 164 bottle roll tests have been completed to date on the Camino Rojo ore body as well as physical characterization and preliminary flotation test work.

 

Selected test work and results from the programs carried out to-date for the Camino Rojo Project are summarized chronologically below and are referenced in this report. Although condensed, for the sake of completeness, as much relevant data as practical are presented here, as a significant amount of metallurgical work has been done. Sample locations for all column test work are presented in Figure 13-1.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 13-1 Column Leach Test Sample Locations (Orla, 2019)

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

13.1 Canplats (2009 & 2010)

 

Canplats commissioned SGS Mineral Services Minerals in Durango, Mexico to conduct bottle roll, column leach, and flotation tests in two programs on Camino Rojo drill core samples and in 2009 publicly disclosed results of 18 column leach tests, 61 bottle roll tests, and 35 flotation tests.

 

In 2010, Mine and Quarry Engineering Services, on behalf of Canplats, commissioned KCA to perform additional metallurgical test work based on material mineralization according to the geological and mineral interpretations at the time. Test work performed included cyanide shake tests on 569 individual samples and 16 composites, 16 column leach tests, as well as percolation and agglomeration tests.

 

13.1.1 SGS Mineral Services (2009)

 

Results for the 2009 SGS test program summarized herein are extracted from the Canplats 2009 technical report (Blanchflower, K.D., Kaye, C., and Steidtmann, H., 2009).

 

Composite samples for the first program by SGS were obtained from diamond drill cores of oxide and transition material. Tests performed during the first program included bottle roll, column leach and flotation. The second program used samples from diamond drill cores of oxide, sulphide and transition materials. Material from the second program was used for bottle roll and flotation tests. No mineralogy, bond work index and crusher abrasion index tests were performed.

 

13.1.1.1 SGS Mineral Services 2009 – Column Leach Tests

 

Column leach tests results are summarized in Table 13-1 and Table 13-2 for oxide and transition composites, respectively, and indicate that variations in crush sizes between 37mm and 9.5mm for oxide material have a negligible effect on gold recovery. Silver recoveries tended to increase as the crush size was reduced to 9.5mm. The effect of crush size on transition material was only evaluated on 2 samples and there were insufficient data to show any meaningful trends. In general, gold recovery was higher for oxide material than transition material. Silver recoveries were consistently higher in transition samples than in oxide samples. Ultimate gold and silver recoveries for oxide material were achieved between 40 and 50 days. Different recovery trends for gold and silver based on material classification (oxide or transition) were evident. At a 19mm crush size, modeling of recovery versus head grades indicated that at a 0.7 g/t Au head grade, a gold recovery of approximately 74% for oxide material and 69% for transition material was predicted. At a 14 g/t Ag head grade, column test results indicated a silver recovery of approximately 23% for oxide material and 28% for transition material.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-1
Oxide Column Test Results - SGS Mineral Services 2009

 

Column Crush
Size
(mm)
Calculated Head Grade Extraction Consumption
Gold
(g/t)
Silver
(g/t)
Gold
(%)
Silver
(%)
NaCN
(kg/T)
CaO
(kg/T)
CRM-06-1 38 0.672 8.27 72.59 12.84 0.66 2.29
  19 0.603 9.36 73.31 14.91 0.87 3.34
  9.5 0.537 9.00 73.65 19.02 0.81 4.28
               
CRM-06-2/3 38 1.952 10.63 83.66 12.05 0.79 2.36
  19 1.794 11.51 86.60 21.23 0.99 2.81
  9.5 1.795 11.58 86.49 25.27 1.23 4.60
               
CRM-14-1 38 0.508 19.24 62.14 30.39 0.78 3.00
  19 0.486 18.01 64.14 32.29 0.62 3.30
  9.5 0.486 18.01 61.81 28.06 0.91 4.30
               
CRM-20-1 38 0.369 14.09 65.15 23.16 0.58 2.63
  19 0.338 17.94 78.08 23.21 0.55 2.31
  9.5 0.359 15.26 74.81 30.88 0.71 3.55

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-2
Transition Column Test Results - SGS Mineral Services 2009

 

Column Crush
Size
(mm)
Calculated Head Grade Extraction Consumption
Gold
(g/t)
Silver
(g/t)
Gold
(%)
Silver
(%)
NaCN
(kg/T)
CaO
(kg/T)
CRM-14-2 38 0.431 15.51 34.74 33.71 0.67 1.59
  19 0.446 13.63 36.35 38.95 0.61 1.44
  9.5 0.387 15.33 33.13 44.15 0.81 2.53
               
CRM-20-2 38 0.593 21.51 55.2 30.54 0.54 1.55
  19 0.585 28.58 62.39 31.74 0.47 1.48
  9.5 0.589 22.35 60.51 50.87 0.84 2.83

 

13.1.1.2 SGS Mineral Services 2009 – Bottle Roll Leach Tests

 

Coarse bottle roll tests at -25mm (1”), -12.5mm (1/2”) and -6.25mm (1/4”) along with finely ground bottle rolls at -70 Mesh and -140 Mesh were conducted on samples from CRM 06 Composites 1, 2 and 3, CRM 14-1 (oxide) and 14-2 (transition) composites and CRM 20-1 (oxide) and 20-2 (transition). Results from the bottle roll tests for CRM 06, CRM 14 and CRM 20 composites are presented in Table 13-3, Table 13-4 and Table 13-5, respectively.

 

Table 13-3
Bottle Roll Test Results CRM 06 Composites - SGS Mineral Services 2009

 

Composite Size Head Assay Residue Extraction
Au g/t Ag g/t Au g/t Ag g/t Au % Ag %
1 25 mm 0.68 9.3 0.21 7.8 74% 14%
12.5 mm" 0.22 8.2 72% 17%
6.25 mm" 0.26 7.2 64% 20%
70 Mesh 0.11 8 84% 44%
140 Mesh 0.06 3 89% 67%
2 25 mm 2.64 20.7 0.39 15.2 77% 16%
12.5 mm" 0.34 15.2 82% 25%
6.25 mm" 0.26 13.3 85% 27%
70 Mesh 0.21 11 87% 43%
140 Mesh 0.18 10 89% 51%
3 25 mm 1.68 8.7 0.39 14.7 79% 5%
12.5 mm" 0.35 10.5 83% 10%
6.25 mm" 0.32 10.1 83% 11%
70 Mesh 0.11 8 91% 44%
140 Mesh 0.06   96%  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-4
Bottle Roll Test Results CRM 14 Composites - SGS Mineral Services 2009

 

Composite Size Head Assay Residue Extraction
Au g/t Ag g/t Au g/t Ag g/t Au % Ag %
1 25 mm 0.48 20 0.17 14.4 65.3% 29.0%
12.5 mm" 0.16 16.1 67.4% 31.6%
6.25 mm" 0.17 12.2 67.7% 41.1%
70 Mesh 0.12 7.0 72.3% 59.5%
140 Mesh 0.17 11.0 70.2% 53.3%
2 25 mm 0.50 14.0 0.26 7.4 32.5% 37.8%
12.5 mm" 0.29 8.6 32.7% 39.2%
6.25 mm" 0.34 4.5 26.1% 59.6%
70 Mesh 0.35 3.0 39.5% 76.8%
140 Mesh 0.28 3.0 50.1% 79.9%

 

Table 13-5
Bottle Roll Test Results CRM 20 Composites - SGS Mineral Services 2009

 

Composite Size Head Assay Residue Extraction
Au g/t Ag g/t Au g/t Ag g/t Au % Ag %
1 25 mm 0.39 19.7 0.16 16.0 62.6% 22.3%
12.5 mm" 0.12 15.0 69.3% 23.4%
6.25 mm" 0.12 13.0 71.2% 32.0%
70 Mesh 0.13 8.0 70.1% 60.7%
140 Mesh 0.09 8.0 81.5% 60.9%
2 25 mm 0.50 14.0 0.28 15.0 57.1% 33.8%
12.5 mm" 0.24 13.0 62.4% 45.1%
6.25 mm" 0.26 11.0 63.1% 55.6%
70 Mesh 0.19 3.0 68.1% 86.7%
140 Mesh 0.15 3.0 74.2% 85.8%

 

 

Bottle roll tests results show slightly increasing recoveries with finer crushing for all material types with silver recoveries being more sensitive to crush size than gold. Additionally, observed gold recoveries were significantly higher for the oxide composites compared to the transition composites and higher silver recoveries were observed in the transition composites compared to the oxide composites. Dissolution of gold and silver for the bottle roll tests was essentially complete after 48 hours.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-6

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

13.1.1.3 SGS Mineral Services 2009 – Flotation Tests

 

Flotation tests were completed on CRM06 composites 1, 2 and 3, CRM14 composites 1 and 2 and CRM20 composites 1 and 2 at grind sizes of 65% -200 Mesh and 75% -200 Mesh as well as additional tests with a sulphidizing reagent Na2S added. Additional Pb/Zn flotation tests were performed on 14 transition and sulphide composites from Camino Rojo drill holes CRD-005, CRD-009, CRD-012, CRD-013, CRD-015, CRD-022 and CRD-023 at grind sizes of 80% - 200 Mesh. A summary of the additional transition and sulphide samples is presented in Table 13-6.

 

Table 13-6
Transition & Sulphide Samples for Flotation Tests - SGS Mineral Services 2009

Hole Number Metres Samples Number Composite
Label
Comments
from to from to
CRD-005 168 198 707003 707022 CRD-005-A Transition
CRD-005 218 248 707036 707062 CRD-005-B Transition
CRD-009 532 560 710714 710733 CRD-009-A Sulphide
CRD-009 674 700 710808 710827 CRD-009-B Sulphide
CRD-012 290 320 712263 712279 CRD-012-A Sulphide
CRD-012 360 390 712306 712323 CRD-012-B Sulphide
CRD-012 522 556 712407 712426 CRD-012-C Sulphide
CRD-013 260 288 711343 711359 CRD-013-A Transition
CRD-013 316 348 711378 711397 CRD-013-B Sulphide
CRD-015 164 194 712819 712838 CRD-015-A Transition
CRD-015 220 250 712859 712876 CRD-015-B Transition
CRD-015 296 326 712906 712925 CRD-015-C Sulphide
CRD-022 180 210 534479 534499 CRD-022-A Transition
CRD-023 312 346 537533 537554 CRD-023-A Sulphide

 

 

Results from the flotation test work indicated that the oxide material is not amenable to treatment by flotation and sulphidization did not improve the metallurgical response of this material. Flotation tests on sulphide samples produced some encouraging results for recoveries of base metals. Three tests recorded recoveries of lead to a lead rougher concentrate in excess of 85% while two others indicated recoveries in excess of 70%. Apart from these tests, however, lead grades were mostly low and considerable upgrading would be required to produce a marketable lead concentrate. Recoveries of zinc to a zinc rougher concentrate were mostly modest although two tests recorded recoveries in excess of 75%. Results indicated considerable upgrading of both lead and zinc rougher concentrates would be required to produce a marketable concentrate. Recoveries of gold and silver to the lead rougher concentrate ranged between 5% and 67% for gold and 7% and 78% for silver.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

13.1.2 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2010)

 

Results for the 2010 KCA test program summarized herein are extracted from the KCA laboratory report titled “Camino Rojo Project Report on Metallurgical Test Work, April 2010” (KCA, 2010).

 

The 2010 metallurgical program was commissioned by Mine and Quarry Engineering Services (MQes) on behalf of Canplats to investigate:

 

· The metallurgical response of the Camino Rojo material based on geological classifications (oxide, transition and sulphide);
· Spatial distribution within the known resource boundary;
· Effect of head grade on metallurgical recoveries; and
· The development of a geo-metallurgical model for the resource.

 

A total of 1,477 kg of sample material consisting of 569 individual ¼ to ½ split core interval samples were submitted for test work. The individual core samples were crushed to a nominal -38mm and then used to prepare 16 composite samples.

 

Metallurgical testing included cyanide shake tests on portions of the 569 individual core samples as well as the 16 composite samples, head analyses on the 16 composite samples including semi-quantitative multi-element and whole rock analysis and assays for carbon, sulphur, mercury, gold and silver, percolation and agglomeration test work and column leach test work.

 

13.1.2.1 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2010) – Head Analyses and Cyanide Shake Tests

 

Composite samples were prepared by combining sample intervals as specified by MQes to generate 16 composite samples. Head analyses were completed for each composite sample and are presented in Table 13-7, Table 13-8 and Table 13-9 for gold and silver, carbon and sulphur and mercury and copper, respectively. Multi-element and whole rock analyses were also performed on each composite sample. Multi-element analysis shows arsenic concentrations ranging from 184 to 1031 ppm as well as elevated concentrations of lead and zinc.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-7
Head Analysis Gold & Silver – KCA 2010

KCA
Sample No.
Composite Average Assay,
g/t Au
Average Assay,
g/t Ag
42433 1 0.31 11.8
42434 2 0.83 18.5
42435 3 0.91 23.5
42436 4 0.37 8.7
42437 5 0.64 15.7
42438 6 0.98 23.8
42439 7 0.73 12.7
42440 9 0.61 18.5
42441 10 0.81 36.0
42442 11 0.55 12.7
42443 12 0.59 19.2
42444 14 0.59 16.2
42445 16 0.59 14.7
42446 17 0.72 27.1
42447 18 0.30 8.9
42448 21 0.24 11.1
Note: Silver analyses by 4-acid digestion with FAAS finish.
Note: Detection limit for silver by 4-acid digestion with FAAS finish is 0.2 g/t Au.

 

Table 13-8
Carbon & Sulphur Summary – KCA 2010

KCA
Sample No.
Composite Total
Carbon,
%
Total
Sulphur,
%
Sulphide
Sulphur,
%
Sulphate
Sulphur,
%
42433 1 0.86 0.13 0.01 0.12
42434 2 0.73 0.32 0.03 0.30
42435 3 0.35 0.32 0.05 0.28
42436 4 1.17 1.88 1.35 0.54
42437 5 1.06 2.42 1.81 0.62
42438 6 0.49 1.65 1.21 0.44
42439 7 1.60 3.61 2.91 0.70
42440 9 0.23 0.14 0.02 0.13
42441 10 0.08 0.24 0.02 0.21
42442 11 0.78 2.56 2.11 0.45
42443 12 0.44 2.01 1.52 0.49
42444 14 2.47 5.07 4.06 1.01
42445 16 0.40 0.16 0.01 0.15
42446 17 0.22 0.26 0.04 0.22
42447 18 1.48 3.22 2.52 0.70
42448 21 1.43 3.99 3.29 0.70
Note: The detection limit for carbon and sulphur by LECO analysis is 0.01%

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-9
Mercury & Copper Summary – KCA 2010

KCA
Sample No.
Composite Total Mercury,
mg/kg
Total Copper, mg/kg Cyanide Soluble Copper, mg/kg Cyanide Soluble Copper,
%
42433 1 <0.05 65 28 43%
42434 2 <0.05 80 20 25%
42435 3 <0.05 114 31 27%
42436 4 <0.05 95 82 86%
42437 5 <0.05 89 68 76%
42438 6 <0.05 98 56 57%
42439 7 <0.05 150 86 57%
42440 9 <0.05 92 10 11%
42441 10 <0.05 118 28 24%
42442 11 <0.05 34 27 79%
42443 12 <0.05 80 62 78%
42444 14 <0.05 53 32 60%
42445 16 <0.05 65 21 32%
42446 17 <0.05 113 36 32%
42447 18 <0.05 72 56 78%
42448 21 <0.05 116 68 59%

Based on the head analysis, material grades ranged from 0.3 to 0.98 g/t Au and 8.7 to 36.0 g/t Ag. The composites did not show significant mercury or cyanide soluble copper.

 

Cyanide shake tests were conducted on portions of the 569 individual samples and the sixteen composite samples generated. Samples were pulverized to 80% passing 0.075mm and agitated with 5 g/L NaCN solution for 24 hours. Results from the cyanide shake tests the composite samples are presented in Table 13-10.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-10

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-10
Composite Cyanide Shake Tests Results Summary – KCA 2010

KCA Sample No. Composite Type Weighted Avg Calculated Head, g/t Au Weighted Avg Calculated Head, g/t Ag Weighted Avg Au Recov, % Weighted Avg Ag Recov, %
42433 1 Oxide 0.35 9.13 61% 61%
42434 2 Oxide 0.86 13.33 77% 64%
42435 3 Oxide 1.25 21.19 75% 71%
42436 4 Transition 0.48 10.17 64% 56%
42437 5 Transition 0.75 17.64 66% 69%
42438 6 Transition 0.94 21.59 73% 80%
42439 7 Sulphide 0.49 16.27 53% 46%
42440 9 Oxide 0.73 16.25 70% 66%
42441 10 Oxide 0.88 24.91 77% 74%
42442 11 Trans / Sulphide 0.38 11.69 48% 67%
42443 12 Transition 0.54 17.60 50% 73%
42444 14 Sulphide 0.40 6.48 24% 38%
42445 16 Oxide 0.62 11.02 78% 60%
42446 17 Oxide 0.82 25.02 77% 67%
42447 18 Trans / Sulphide 0.29 7.06 52% 54%
42448 21 Sulphide 0.23 7.48 54% 41%

 

The cyanide shake tests show there is significant variability in metal recoveries with regards to material type with generally higher recoveries with oxide material.

 

13.1.2.2 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2010) – Column Leach Tests

 

Column leach tests were conducted on material from composites 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17 and 18 at -19mm with additional tests at -9.5mm on material from composites 2, 9 and 16. Results from the column tests are presented in Table 13-11.

 

Gold recoveries ranged from 36% to 80% with higher observed recoveries on oxide material and significantly lower recoveries on the transition/sulphide mix material. Only minor recovery improvements with finer crush size (-9.5mm vs. -19mm) were observed based on test results on the same composite at different crush sizes. Reagent consumptions were low to moderate with NaCN consumption ranging between 0.77 to 1.30 kg/t and lime consumptions around 1.0 kg/t.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-11
Column Leach Test Results on Composites – KCA 2010

Composite Type Crush Size,
mm
Calculated Head,
g/t Au
Extracted,
% Au
Consumption NaCN,
kg/t
Hydrated Lime Addition,
kg/t
1 Oxide 19.0 0.33 63% 1.30 1.01
2 Oxide 19.0 0.77 70% 1.10 1.00
2 Oxide 9.5 0.78 73% 1.07 1.00
3 Oxide 19.0 0.96 75% 0.95 1.01
4 Transition 19.0 0.37 49% 0.95 1.00
5 Transition 19.0 0.64 57% 1.06 1.01
6 Transition 19.0 0.95 67% 1.06 1.01
9 Oxide 19.0 0.59 74% 1.16 1.01
9 Oxide 9.5 0.61 79% 1.34 1.01
10 Oxide 19.0 0.81 78% 1.30 1.01
11 Trans / Sulphide 19.0 0.44 36% 1.01 1.01
12 Transition 19.0 0.57 51% 1.28 1.01
16 Oxide 19.0 0.60 78% 1.08 1.01
16 Oxide 9.5 0.58 79% 0.98 1.01
17 Oxide 19.0 0.83 80% 0.77 1.00
18 Trans / Sulphide 19.0 0.27 41% 0.90 1.00
Average   19 0.63 63% 1.07 1.01
Average   9.5 0.66 77% 1.13 1.01

 

13.2 Goldcorp (2012-2015)

 

Between 2012 and 2015, Goldcorp carried out several metallurgical programs on oxide, sulphide and transition material. This work was performed by several different metallurgical testing groups including KCA, Blue Coast Research Metallurgy in Parksville, B.C., and Hazen Research in Golden, CO.

 

KCA completed three separate test programs for Goldcorp between 2012 and 2015 including column leach tests, agglomeration and percolation tests, bottle roll tests and cyanide shake tests.

 

The column tests were completed on composite samples of split core by material types and lithologies. The 2012 program included 28 column tests on 14 different composites by pit oxidation level and material type. The 2014 program included 68 direct and carbon in leach (CIL) bottle leach tests on cut and broken core intervals. The 2015 program included 26 column tests on 13 different composites by lithology.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-12

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The Blue Coast Research Metallurgy program consisted of a variability study, small scale gravity tests, and a flotation flowsheet development. The variability program subjected 98 samples to small-scale bench flotation, small-scale leach testing, and small-scale gravity recovery tests. Flotation flowsheet development testing was conducted on three bulk sulphide composites: one from the Represa zone and two from the West Extension.

 

The Hazen Research test program included grinding, flotation, and cyanide leaching studies of sulphide and transitional material on some 112 composites.

 

13.2.1 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2012)

 

Results for the 2012 KCA test program summarized herein are extracted from the KCA laboratory report titled “Camino Rojo Project Report on Metallurgical Test Work, May 2012” (KCA, 2012).

 

The 2012 KCA test program was conducted on half split HQ core material which was used to generate 14 composite samples. Core intervals received were sorted according to zone and oxidation class as requested by Goldcorp. Each composite was utilized for head analyses, bottle roll leach testing, agglomeration testing and column leach testing.

 

13.2.1.1 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2012) - Head Analyses

 

Head analyses were completed on each composite sample. Assays for gold and silver are presented in Table 13-12. Quantitative assays for carbon and sulphur and mercury and copper were also completed and are presented in Table 13-13 and Table 13-14, respectively. Semi-quantitative assays by means of ICAP-OES for multi-element and whole rock analyses were performed.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-13

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-12

 

Head Analysis Gold & Silver– KCA 2012

KCA
Sample No.
Description Average
Assay,
g Au/MT
Average
Assay,
g/t Ag
Weighted
Avg. Head Assay1,
g Au/MT
Weighted
Avg. Head
Assay1,
g/t Ag
62401 Composite 1, Central-Oxide 0.350 13.75 0.361 13.38
62402 Composite 6, East-Oxide 0.490 9.29 0.510 9.21
62403 Composite 10, West-Oxide 1.875 11.65 2.551 11.38
62404 Composite 2, Central-Transition 0.468 13.71 0.508 12.05
62405 Composite 3, Central-Transition 0.501 21.00 0.489 18.53
62406 Composite 4, Central-Transition 0.950 25.41 0.991 22.67
62407 Composite 7, East-Transition 0.459 14.30 0.538 13.69
62408 Composite 8, East-Transition 0.799 25.51 0.818 22.59
62409 Composite 9, East-Transition 0.566 9.39 0.582 8.69
62410 Composite 11, West-Transition 0.655 10.01 0.641 8.62
62411 Composite 12, West-Transition 0.345 17.31 0.420 14.77
62412 Composite 13, West-Transition 0.492 12.60 0.517 12.40
62413 Composite 5, Central-Sulphide 0.434 5.90 0.406 5.47
62414 Composite 14, West-Sulphide 0.405 8.14 0.387 6.80

  

Table 13-13

 

Head Analysis Carbon & Sulphur– KCA 2012

KCA
Sample No.
Description Total
Carbon, %
Total
Sulphur,
%
Sulphide
Sulphur,
%
Sulphate
Sulphur, %
62401 Composite 1, Central-Oxide 0.32 0.18 0.01 0.17
62402 Composite 6, East-Oxide 0.76 0.22 0.01 0.21
62403 Composite 10, West-Oxide 0.51 0.25 0.01 0.24
62404 Composite 2, Central-Transition 1.09 1.93 1.42 0.51
62405 Composite 3, Central-Transition 1.03 4.42 3.48 0.93
62406 Composite 4, Central-Transition 0.34 1.77 1.37 0.40
62407 Composite 7, East-Transition 1.44 0.62 0.23 0.39
62408 Composite 8, East-Transition 0.86 1.33 0.90 0.43
62409 Composite 9, East-Transition 2.02 0.88 0.47 0.41
62410 Composite 11, West-Transition 1.05 3.22 2.55 0.67
62411 Composite 12, West-Transition 1.19 2.41 1.83 0.58
62412 Composite 13, West-Transition 1.15 0.52 0.22 0.31
62413 Composite 5, Central-Sulphide 1.69 3.55 2.87 0.69
62414 Composite 14, West-Sulphide 1.55 3.78 2.78 0.99

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-14

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-14

 

Head Analysis Mercury & Copper– KCA 2012

 

KCA
Sample
No.
Description Total
Mercury,
mg/kg
Total
Copper,
mg/kg
Cyanide
Soluble
Copper*,
mg/kg
Cyanide
Soluble
Copper,
%
62401 Composite 1, Central-Oxide <0.05 161 8.13 5%
62402 Composite 6, East-Oxide <0.05 165 3.33 2%
62403 Composite 10, West-Oxide <0.05 99 7.46 8%
62404 Composite 2, Central-Transition <0.05 115 69.05 60%
62405 Composite 3, Central-Transition <0.05 153 82.85 54%
62406 Composite 4, Central-Transition <0.05 102 46.20 45%
62407 Composite 7, East-Transition <0.05 97 47.30 49%
62408 Composite 8, East-Transition <0.05 69 51.70 75%
62409 Composite 9, East-Transition <0.05 78 41.70 53%
62410 Composite 11, West-Transition <0.05 97 58.35 60%
62411 Composite 12, West-Transition <0.05 132 74.75 57%
62412 Composite 13, West-Transition <0.05 103 51.50 50%
62413 Composite 5, Central-Sulphide <0.05 77 32.30 42%
62414 Composite 14, West-Sulphide <0.05 75 30.45 41%
           
*Note: Average of two (2) splits        

 

13.2.1.2 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2012) – Bottle Roll Leach Tests

 

Cyanide bottle roll tests at 80% passing 0.075mm were performed on a portion of each sample and were run for 96 hours. Sodium cyanide was maintained at 1.0 g/L solution and a pH of 11.0 was maintained by adding hydrated lime.

 

Additional bottle roll tests were then completed on each composite which had an initial gold extraction of less than 20% including composites 2, 7, 9 and 12. These additional tests were performed with the same parameters with increased sodium cyanide concentrations of 5.0 g/L solution.

 

Bottle roll leach test results are presented in Table 13-15 for gold and Table 13-16 for silver.

 

Based on the bottle roll test results, oxide sample recoveries ranged between 71% and 91% for gold and 18% and 61% for silver. Transition recoveries ranged between 0% and 77% for gold and 37% to 93% for silver. Sulphide recoveries ranged between 0% and 16% for gold and 28% to 40% for silver.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-15

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

The bottle roll test results indicate that the oxide samples are amenable to cyanide leaching for recovery of gold with lower recoveries for silver. Recoveries for transition material are highly variable for gold with good recoveries for silver. Sulphide samples are not amenable to cyanide leaching for the recovery of gold and leaching of sulphides results in relatively low recoveries for silver. Increased cyanide concentrations resulted in higher cyanide consumptions with minor to no recovery improvements for gold ranging from 0% to 4% and silver recovery improvements ranging from 0% to 11%.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-16

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-15

 

Bottle Roll Leach Tests Summary, Gold– KCA 2012

KCA
Sample No.
Description Target
NaCN,
g/L
Calculated
Head,
g/t Au
Extracted,
g/t Au
Avg.
Tails,
g/t Au
Bottle Roll Au
Extracted,
%
Leach
Time,
hours
Consumption
NaCN,
kg/t
Addition Ca(OH)2,
kg/t
62401 Composite 1, Central-Oxide 1 0.363 0.259 0.104 71% 96 0.33 2.50
62402 Composite 6, East-Oxide 1 0.505 0.387 0.118 77% 96 0.19 2.00
62403 Composite 10, West-Oxide 1 1.851 1.680 0.171 91% 96 0.33 2.00
62404 Composite 2, Central-Transition 1 0.458 0.016 0.442 4% 96 0.66 1.50
62404 Composite 2, Central-Transition 1 0.519 0.047 0.472 9% 96 0.74 1.50
62404 Composite 2, Central-Transition 5 0.535 0.062 0.473 12% 96 1.47 1.50
62405 Composite 3, Central-Transition 1 0.516 0.113 0.403 22% 96 1.21 2.00
62406 Composite 4, Central-Transition 1 0.741 0.503 0.238 68% 96 0.54 2.00
62407 Composite 7, East-Transition 1 0.425 0.000 0.425 0% 96 0.52 2.00
62407 Composite 7, East-Transition 1 0.523 0.016 0.507 3% 96 0.48 2.00
62407 Composite 7, East-Transition 5 0.514 0.031 0.483 6% 96 1.08 2.00
62408 Composite 8, East-Transition 1 0.656 0.047 0.609 7% 96 0.73 2.00
62409 Composite 9, East-Transition 1 0.564 0.000 0.564 0% 96 0.66 2.00
62409 Composite 9, East-Transition 1 0.575 0.032 0.543 6% 96 0.46 2.00
62409 Composite 9, East-Transition 5 0.572 0.032 0.540 6% 96 0.84 2.00
62410 Composite 11, West-Transition 1 0.582 0.130 0.453 22% 96 0.57 1.50
62411 Composite 12, West-Transition 1 0.322 0.000 0.322 0% 96 0.91 2.50
62411 Composite 12, West-Transition 1 0.407 0.016 0.391 4% 96 1.20 2.50
62411 Composite 12, West-Transition 5 0.400 0.016 0.384 4% 96 1.96 2.00
62412 Composite 13, West-Transition 1 0.486 0.373 0.112 77% 96 0.30 1.50
62413 Composite 5, Central-Sulphide 1 0.435 0.047 0.387 11% 96 0.75 2.50
62413 Composite 5, Central-Sulphide 1 0.525 0.062 0.463 12% 96 0.72 2.00
62413 Composite 5, Central-Sulphide 5 0.504 0.079 0.425 16% 96 1.99 2.00
62414 Composite 14, West-Sulphide 1 0.362 0.000 0.362 0% 96 0.98 1.50
62414 Composite 14, West-Sulphide 1 0.381 0.000 0.381 0% 96 0.85 1.50
62414 Composite 14, West-Sulphide 5 0.399 0.000 0.399 0% 96 2.34 1.50

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-17

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-16

 

Bottle Roll Leach Tests Summary, Silver– KCA 2012 

KCA
Sample No.
Description Target
NaCN,
g/L
Calculated
Head,
g/t Ag
Extracted,
g/t Ag
Avg.
Tails,
g/t Ag
Ag
Extracted,
%
Leach
Time,
hours
Consumption
NaCN,
kg/t
Addition
Ca(OH)2,
kg/t
62401 Composite 1, Central-Oxide 1 11.91 7.21 4.70 61% 96 0.33 2.50
62402 Composite 6, East-Oxide 1 10.09 1.8 8.30 18% 96 0.19 2.00
62403 Composite 10, West-Oxide 1 10.06 3.17 6.89 32% 96 0.33 2.00
62404 Composite 2, Central-Transition 1 8.79 7.69 1.10 88% 96 0.66 1.50
62404 Composite 2, Central-Transition 1 12.55 9.00 3.55 72% 96 0.74 1.50
62404 Composite 2, Central-Transition 5 13.92 10.01 3.91 72% 96 1.47 1.50
62405 Composite 3, Central-Transition 1 19.33 14.84 4.49 77% 96 1.21 2.00
62406 Composite 4, Central-Transition 1 26.68 24.78 1.90 93% 96 0.54 2.00
62407 Composite 7, East-Transition 1 12.31 8.20 4.11 67% 96 0.52 2.00
62407 Composite 7, East-Transition 1 14.15 8.35 5.79 59% 96 0.48 2.00
62407 Composite 7, East-Transition 5 13.46 9.27 4.00 70% 96 1.08 2.00
62408 Composite 8, East-Transition 1 17.49 15.29 2.19 87% 96 0.73 2.00
62409 Composite 9, East-Transition 1 6.97 2.57 4.41 37% 96 0.66 2.00
62409 Composite 9, East-Transition 1 6.85 2.76 4.10 40% 96 0.46 2.00
62409 Composite 9, East-Transition 5 7.27 3.57 3.70 49% 96 0.84 2.00
62410 Composite 11, West-Transition 1 8.28 5.98 2.30 72% 96 0.57 1.50
62411 Composite 12, West-Transition 1 13.54 9.32 4.22 69% 96 0.91 2.50
62411 Composite 12, West-Transition 1 16.12 11.40 4.71 71% 96 1.20 2.50
62411 Composite 12, West-Transition 5 17.15 13.03 4.11 76% 96 1.96 2.00
62412 Composite 13, West-Transition 1 11.91 9.93 1.99 83% 96 0.30 1.50
62413 Composite 5, Central-Sulphide 1 4.64 1.44 3.21 31% 96 0.75 2.50
62413 Composite 5, Central-Sulphide 1 5.67 2.07 3.60 37% 96 0.72 2.00
62413 Composite 5, Central-Sulphide 5 6.33 2.44 3.89 39% 96 1.99 2.00
62414 Composite 14, West-Sulphide 1 7.09 1.98 5.11 28% 96 0.98 1.50
62414 Composite 14, West-Sulphide 1 7.49 2.59 4.90 35% 96 0.85 1.50
62414 Composite 14, West-Sulphide 5 8.40 3.40 5.01 40% 96 2.34 1.50

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-18

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

13.2.1.3 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2012) – Column Leach Test Work

 

Column leach tests were conducted on each composite at crush sizes of 100% passing 25mm and 12.5mm. Columns were leached for 113 days using a dilute sodium cyanide solution. Column leach test results are presented in Table 13-17.

 

For the oxide material the column tests showed that an average of 71% of the contained gold could be extracted from the material when crushed to 100% passing 25 millimetres with no additional extraction at 100% passing 12.5mm. The transition material showed an average recovery of 31% of the contained gold at 100% passing 25 millimetres and 30% at 100% passing 12.5 millimetres. Sulphide material recoveries ranged between 6% and 17% of the contained gold with very little recovery difference at 100% passing 25 millimetres and 100% passing 12.5 millimetres. Silver recoveries were generally higher with finer crushing. Reagent consumptions were low to moderate with an overall average NaCN consumption of 0.77 kg/t material and lime consumption of 2.03 kg/t material.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-19

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-17

 

KCA 2012 Summary of Column Leach Test Results by Material Type

Description Crush Size,
mm
Calculated
Head,
g/t Au
Extracted,
% Au
Calculated
Head,
g/t Ag
Extracted,
% Ag
Calculated
Tail P80
Size, mm
Consumption
NaCN,
kg/t
Addition
Hydrated
Lime,
kg/t
Composite 1, Central-Oxide 25.0 0.376 67% 13.07 15% 19.0 1.41 2.04
Composite 1, Central-Oxide 12.5 0.390 68% 15.37 19% 9.19 1.23 2.04
Composite 6, East-Oxide 25.0 0.573 62% 11.20 1% 17.8 1.08 2.01
Composite 6, East-Oxide 12.5 0.527 61% 13.62 2% 9.04 1.05 2.04
Composite 10, West-Oxide 25.0 2.031 83% 10.74 3% 17.8 0.18 2.03
Composite 10, West-Oxide 12.5 2.130 84% 13.24 2% 9.47 0.41 2.02
Composite 2, Central-Transition 25.0 0.484 28% 13.14 36% 18.5 0.44 2.03
Composite 2, Central-Transition 12.5 0.482 23% 15.03 41% 9.75 0.57 2.02
Composite 3, Central-Transition 25.0 0.484 26% 16.98 37% 17.9 0.56 2.03
Composite 3, Central-Transition 12.5 0.479 30% 18.26 45% 9.37 0.54 2.03
Composite 4, Central-Transition 25.0 1.448 40% 26.62 37% 18.5 0.59 2.02
Composite 4, Central-Transition 12.5 1.263 51% 29.05 49% 9.19 0.77 2.03
Composite 7, East-Transition 25.0 0.518 25% 14.63 43% 16.0 0.76 2.04
Composite 7, East-Transition 12.5 0.553 15% 16.97 46% 8.87 0.67 2.04
Composite 8, East-Transition 25.0 0.867 28% 21.07 42% 18.2 0.62 2.03
Composite 8, East-Transition 12.5 0.821 26% 23.74 52% 9.25 0.58 2.04
Composite 9, East-Transition 25.0 0.592 12% 11.36 29% 17.1 0.68 2.03
Composite 9, East-Transition 12.5 0.679 9% 11.07 33% 8.91 1.00 2.03
Composite 11, West-Transition 25.0 0.652 33% 10.02 36% 17.3 0.75 2.03
Composite 11, West-Transition 12.5 0.658 30% 11.17 35% 9.26 0.79 2.04
Composite 12, West-Transition 25.0 0.454 17% 19.37 41% 17.6 0.94 2.04
Composite 12, West-Transition 12.5 0.401 18% 19.70 41% 9.73 1.30 2.04
Composite 13, West-Transition 25.0 0.532 70% 10.21 22% 17.1 0.65 2.04
Composite 13, West-Transition 12.5 0.575 70% 15.46 26% 8.38 0.87 2.03
Composite 5, Central-Sulphide 25.0 0.446 8% 8.25 11% 17.8 0.86 2.02
Composite 5, Central-Sulphide 12.5 0.410 6% 6.42 17% 9.56 0.69 2.03
Composite 14, West-Sulphide 25.0 0.429 17% 5.31 14% 17.6 0.81 2.03
Composite 14, West-Sulphide 12.5 0.421 18% 4.62 18% 9.15 0.64 2.04
Average, Oxide 25.0 0.993 71% 14.50 6% 18.2 0.89 2.03
Average, Oxide 12.5 1.016 71% 11.67 8% 9.2 0.90 2.03
Average, Transition 25.0 0.670 31% 17.58 36% 17.6 0.67 2.03
Average, Transition 12.5 0.657 30% 15.93 41% 9.2 0.79 2.03
Average, Sulphide 25.0 0.438 13% 10.94 17% 17.7 0.84 2.03
Average, Sulphide 12.5 0.416 12% 6.78 18% 9.4 0.67 2.04

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-20

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

13.2.2 Blue Coast Research Metallurgy (2012-2013)

 

Results for the 2014 Blue Coast test program summarized herein are extracted from the Blue Coast Research report titled “Camino Rojo Final Report, March 2014” (Blue Coast, 2014).

 

A test work program was undertaken in 2012/2013 at Blue Coast Research Metallurgy (“Blue Coast Research”) in Parksville, B.C. This program consisted of a variability study, a small gravity program, and a flotation flowsheet development component (Blue Coast Research Ltd., 2014). Tests were completed using four samples selected to obtain information from a high oxidation and low oxidation sample from both the west and east zones of the deposit.

 

The variability program subjected 98 samples to small-scale bench flotation, small-scale leach testing, and small-scale gravity recovery tests. Flotation flowsheet development testing was conducted on three bulk sulphide composites: one from the central part of the deposit and two from the western part.

 

Blue Coast Research performed nine single-pass gravity recoverable gold (“GRG”) tests on different samples from various locations in the Camino Rojo deposit, both in the Represa and in the West Extension areas. A single extended GRG test was performed on a sulphide sample from the western part of the deposit (WE MC1). The results of these tests demonstrated gold recoveries greater than 20% at nominal primary grind feed sizes with mass pulls averaging 2%. These results suggest that concentration of gold by an initial gravity process is a viable option for sulphide material. No subsequent gravity work has been conducted to date.

 

Very little transitional material was tested at Blue Coast Research; the majority of the test work completed was performed on sulphide material from the western part of the deposit. Flowsheet development work conducted at Blue Coast Research formed the basis for understanding the processing options for the Camino Rojo sulphide deposit.

 

A full mineralogical analysis was performed on several samples during the FS. The results of the QEMSCAN sulphide mineralogy indicated that the sphalerite was relatively coarse-grained, being well-liberated (having a 40% release size) well above 100 microns. Galena appeared finer-grained, being well-liberated at 90 microns.

 

Gold mineralogy was undertaken using both optical and D-SIMS techniques. Results indicated that gold was significantly linked to both pyrite and arsenopyrite. Higher gold values were associated with higher arsenic values.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-21

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Results from the Blue Coast Research Tests are presented in Table 13-18, Table 13-19 and Table 13-20.

 

Table 13-18
Summary of Flotation Composite Feed Grades

Composite Au
(g/t)
Ag
(g/t)
Zn% Pb%
WE MC1 1.19 10.8 0.31 0.10
WE MC2 0.89 8.6 0.26 0.08

 

Table 13-19
Lead Flotation Concentrate Grades

Composite Au
(g/t)
Ag
(g/t)
Zn% Pb%
WE MC1 185 2062 0.3 28.00
WE MC2 236 2094 9 36

 

Table 13-20
Zinc Flotation Concentrate Grades

Composite Au
(g/t)
Ag
(g/t)
Zn% Pb%
WE MC1 17 112 41 0.50
WE MC2 9 125 43 0.7

 

13.2.3 Hazen Research (2014)

 

Results for the 2014 Hazen Research test program summarized herein are extracted from the Hazen report titled “Camino Rojo Variability, May 2014” (Hazen, 2014).

 

Hazen Research was commissioned to conduct grinding, flotation, and cyanide leaching studies of sulphide and transitional material. Some 112 composites were tested. Standard flotation methods yielded recoveries of ~90% Au, 74% to 81% Ag, 83% to 90% Zn, and 82% to 91% Pb for sulphide material, and recoveries of 60% to 67% Au, 56% to 63% Ag, 35% Zn, and 48% Pb for transition material (Hazen Research Inc., 2014).

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-22

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

13.2.4 Comminution Testing

 

Comminution testing occurred at SGS Vancouver in 2015 (SGS Canada Inc., 2015). Material for testing was sourced from the Camino Rojo site directly as well as from an existing stockpile of samples being stored at Hazen. From these two sources, a total of 23 half HQ composites and 2 full PQ composites were selected for testing. The HQ samples were selected based on 4 spatial quadrants, alteration, and oxidation. The PQ samples were selected based on their respective oxidation levels which included one near sulphide composite and one highly oxidized composite. JK Drop Weight (Axb), SMC, Abrasion Index (Ai), Crusher Work Index (CWI), Bond Ball Work Index (BWi), Bond Rod Work Index (RWi), SPI, Point Load Index, and Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) tests were performed. It should be noted that only two relevant crusher work indices were obtained from testing data as shown in the summary of results in Table 13-21 below.

 

Table 13-21
Comminution Test Results Summary

  Axb SPI
(min)
Ai
(g)
CWi* (kWh/t) BWi (kWh/t) RWi (kWh/t) UCS* (kN) IS50
(Mpa)
Mean 38.9 99.8 0.123   14.4 15.9   7.48
Min 25.6 34.4 0.017 9.4 8.5 10.8 251.3 3.82
Max 68.2 145.9 0.276 10.5 19.4 19.3 522.3 15.35
RSD% 21.8 29.2 73.7   21.2 15.0   43.9

 

Additionally, comminution results are provided by alteration type in Table 13-22. These alterations are: Pyrite-Carbonate (PC), Incipient Potassic Hornfels (IH), and Potassic Hornfels (HF). As indicated in the table, “S” represents Sulphide and “T” represents Transition.

 

Table 13-22
Comminution Test Results by Alteration Type

  Axb SPI
(min)
Ai
(g)
BWi (kWh/t) RWi (kWh/t) IS50
(Mpa)
PC (S) 41.6 93.0 0.061 12.8 14.4 6.07
PC (T) 50.5 57.2 0.024 9.6 12.1 4.78
IH (S) 29.7 141.2 0.136 16.8 18.6 7.93
IH (T) 40.7 92.0 0.061 13.2 15.3 5.18
HF (S) 32.1 120.1 0.233 17.6 18.2 13.46
HF (T) 39.1 99.4 0.200 16.2 16.7 6.89

 

13.2.5 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2014 & 2015)

 

Results for the 2014 and 2015 KCA test programs summarized herein are extracted from the KCA laboratory reports titled “Camino Rojo Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work, October 2014” (KCA,2014) and “Camino Rojo Project Report on Metallurgical Test Work, August 2015” (KCA, 2015).

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-23

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The 2014 KCA program was conducted on 34 cut and broken core intervals from eight drill holes that were utilized for direct and CIL bottle roll leach tests. The 2015 KCA test program was conducted on cut and broken HQ core material from 469 sample bags, each labelled with a lithology and client sample ID which were used to generate thirteen composite samples. Each composite was utilized for head analyses (including preg-rob test work), direct and carbon in leach (CIL) bottle roll leach tests, and column leach tests.

 

A summary of the material as received is presented in Table 13-23 for the 2014 program and Table 13-24 for the 2015 program.

 

Results from the 2014 test program are discussed in this section where applicable.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 201
9
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-24

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-23
Description of Received Material– KCA 2014

KCA
Sample No.
Drill
Hole
I.D.
Interval, meters %
Ox
Received Weight,
kilograms
 
From To  
 
62949 CR13-379DB 549.5 551 90 6.15  
62950 CR13-380D 749.5 751 90 6.07  
62951 CR13-380D 751 752.5 90 5.85  
62952 CR13-390D 581 582.5 98 5.87  
62953 CR13-390D 582.5 584 98 5.39  
62954 CR13-390D 584 585.5 98 5.73  
62955 CR13-390D 675.5 677 80 4.43  
62956 CR13-390D 677 678.5 80 4.59  
62957 CR13-390D 681.5 683 80 5.29  
62958 CR13-390D 684.5 686 80 4.92  
62959 CR13-390D 687.5 689 70 5.46  
62960 CR13-390D 689 690.5 80 4.42  
62961 CR13-400D 421.5 423 80 6.14  
62962 CR13-400D 423 424.5 80 5.70  
62963 CR13-400D 424.5 426 80 5.99  
62964 CR13-410DB 19.5 21 100 4.71  
62965 CR13-410DB 67.5 69 100 5.30  
62966 CR13-410DB 175.5 177 80 8.59  
62967 CR13-410DB 193.5 195 70 5.62  
62968 CR13-410DB 195 196.5 70 5.46  
62969 CR13-410DB 196.5 198 70 4.70  
62970 CR13-418D 33.5 35 100 4.44  
62971 CR13-418D 63.5 65 100 5.01  
62972 CR13-418D 72.5 74 100 5.15  
62973 CR13-418D 77 78.5 100 4.96  
62974 CR13-418D 98 99.5 100 4.28  
62975 CR13-418D 134 135.5 80 5.34  
62976 CR13-419D 40.5 42 100 5.35  
62977 CR13-419D 84 85.5 100 4.99  
62978 CR13-419D 96 97.5 100 5.23  
62979 CR13-466D 639.5 641 70 5.28  
62980 CR13-466D 647 648.5 90 4.49  
62981 CR13-466D 648.5 650 90 4.68  
62982 CR13-466D 675.5 677 70 5.52  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-25

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-24
Description of Received Material– KCA 2015

KCA
Sample No.
Material
I.D.
Total
Weight, kg
71815 A HF - Ox 11 208.12
71816 A HFT - Hi 2 184.00
71817 A IHT-Hi 4 163.60
71818 A HFT - Hi 8 189.06
71819 A HFT - Lo 1 196.00
71820 A HFT - Lo 7 219.80
71821 A IH - Ox 12 133.04
71822 A IHT - Lo 3 155.90
71823 A OX - Ox 10 163.40
71824 A OX - Ox 9 126.24
71825 A PC - Ox 13 150.84
71826 A PCT - Hi 6 169.88
71827 A PCT - Lo 5 160.36
Total -   2220.24

 

13.2.5.1 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2015) – Head Analyses

 

Head analyses for gold and silver were completed by standard fire assay and wet chemistry methods for each composite and are presented in Table 13-25. Each composite was assayed quantitatively for carbon and sulphur and mercury and copper and are presented in Table 13-26 and Table 13-27. Semi-quantitative analyses for additional elements for whole rock constituents were also completed.

 

The head analyses show gold grades ranging between 0.29 and 1.65 g/t and silver grades ranging between 9.3 and 54.5 g/t. Organic carbon is present at relatively low percentages. Mercury and copper quantities were low and would not be expected to be problematic for cyanide leaching.

 

From the multi element analyses, arsenic (As), lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn) were elevated as is typically seen in association with high silver ores. Barium was elevated but does not generally present a problem in leaching.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-26

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Table 13-25

 

Head Analyses, Gold & Silver– KCA 2015

KCA
Sample
No.
Description Average
Assay,
g/t Au
Average
Assay,
g/t Ag
71815 B HF - Ox 11 1.128 17.95
71816 B HFT - Hi 2 1.378 27.70
71817 B IHT - Hi 4 0.890 26.19
71818 B HFT - Hi 8 1.649 12.41
71819 B HFT - Lo 1 0.979 13.90
71820 B HFT - Lo 7 1.029 9.29
71821 B IH - Ox 12 0.559 23.21
71822 B IHT - Lo 3 0.847 28.06
71823 B OX - Ox 9 0.291 11.61
71824 B OX - Ox 10 0.785 13.30
71825 B PC - Ox 13 0.618 14.81
71826 B PCT - Hi 6 1.165 12.89
71827 B PCT - Lo 5 0.991 54.51
Note - The detection limit for silver with FAAS finish is 0.21 g/t Ag.
Note - For the purpose of calculation a value of 1/2 the detection limit is utilized for assays less than the detection limit.

  

Table 13-26

 

Head Analyses Carbon & Sulphur– KCA 2015

KCA
Sample
No.
Description Total
Carbon,
%
Organic
Carbon,
%
Inorganic
Carbon,
%
Total
Sulphur,
%
Sulphide
Sulphur,
%
Sulphate
Sulphur,
%
71815 B HF - Ox 11 0.67 0.13 0.54 0.32 0.01 0.31
71816 B HFT - Hi 2 0.27 0.10 0.17 0.82 0.46 0.35
71817 B IHT - Hi 4 0.81 0.13 0.68 0.55 0.20 0.34
71818 B HFT - Hi 8 1.17 0.19 0.97 1.80 1.29 0.52
71819 B HFT - Lo 1 0.62 0.18 0.43 1.66 1.19 0.47
71820 B HFT - Lo 7 1.39 0.20 1.19 1.71 1.21 0.50
71821 B IH - Ox 12 0.43 0.11 0.32 0.40 0.11 0.29
71822 B IHT - Lo 3 1.31 0.25 1.06 0.93 0.52 0.42
71823 B OX - Ox 9 0.28 0.05 0.23 0.25 <0.01 0.25
71824 B OX - Ox 10 0.76 0.08 0.69 0.17 <0.01 0.17
71825 B PC - Ox 13 1.54 0.16 1.38 0.34 <0.01 0.34
71826 B PCT - Hi 6 1.69 0.18 1.51 0.10 <0.01 0.10
71827 B PCT - Lo 5 1.82 0.37 1.45 0.84 0.46 0.38

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-27

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Table 13-27

 

Head Analyses Mercury & Copper– KCA 2015

KCA
Sample
No.
Description Total
Mercury,
mg/kg
Total
Copper,
mg/kg
Cyanide1 Soluble
Copper,
mg/kg
Cyanide Soluble
Copper,
%
71815 B HF - Ox 11 <0.02 118 30.4 26%
71816 B HFT - Hi 2 <0.02 125 58.1 46%
71817 B IHT - Hi 4 <0.02 80.2 15.3 19%
71818 B HFT - Hi 8 <0.02 183 87.2 48%
71819 B HFT - Lo 1 <0.02 168 55.8 33%
71820 B HFT - Lo 7 <0.02 145 80.1 55%
71821 B IH - Ox 12 <0.02 91.1 17.8 19%
71822 B IHT - Lo 3 <0.02 102 50.0 49%
71823 B OX - Ox 9 <0.02 74.2 3.51 5%
71824 B OX - Ox 10 <0.02 94.2 3.01 3%
71825 B PC - Ox 13 <0.02 71.4 9.30 13%
71826 B PCT - Hi 6 <0.02 57.5 6.67 12%
71827 B PCT - Lo 5 <0.02 66.1 33.5 51%
Note (1): Average assay from cyanide shake tests.      

  

In addition to the head analyses, direct cyanide shake tests as well as cyanide shake tests with an added gold spike were conducted on each sample to evaluate the material for preg-robbing tendencies.

 

For the preg-rob cyanide shake tests, preg-robbing tendencies are determined by comparing the spiked shake test extraction and the original shake test extraction to determine a % preg-rob. Typically, % preg-robbing greater than 10% indicates preg-robbing tendencies. The cyanide shake test results suggest little or no preg-robbing tendencies with the oxide material and high preg-robbing tendencies with the transition samples, especially with the Trans-Lo material.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-28

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

13.2.5.2 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2014 & 2015) – Bottle Roll Leach Tests

 

Direct and CIL (Carbon-In-Leach) bottle roll leach tests were conducted as part of the 2014 and 2015 test campaigns on portions of each sample or composite sample at 80% passing 0.125mm. Results from the bottle roll leach tests for the 2014 and 2015 programs are presented in Figure 13-2 and Figure 13-3 for gold, respectively. The direct-CIL bottle roll recovery difference vs. organic carbon percent for the 2015 program is presented in Figure 13-4.

 

Figure 13-2 Preg-Robbing Percentage vs. CIL & Direct Bottle Roll Leach Test Recoveries – KCA 2014

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-29

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Figure 13-3 Preg-Robbing Percentage vs. CIL & Direct Bottle Roll Leach Test Recoveries – KCA 2015

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-30

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Figure 13-4 CIL-Direct Bottle Roll Au Extraction Difference vs. Organic Carbon Content – KCA 2015

  

Calculated leach preg robbing values based on the difference between CIL and direct bottle roll test recoveries ranged from 0% to 34% with higher preg-robbing tendencies associated with the transition composites. Based on KCA’s experience, a difference greater than 3% indicates the material could be preg-robbing.

 

Preg-robbing test work performed on the head material did not prove to be an indication of preg-robbing during leaching. Samples that exhibited preg-robbing characteristics during the preg-robbing test work did not necessarily show the same characteristics during direct and CIL bottle roll leach tests. Additionally, no one individual drillhole exhibited any more tendency toward preg-robbing than another. No strong correlations were observed between sulphide sulphur content and preg-rob values, or between organic carbon content and preg-rob values. The bottle roll tests also did not show a strong correlation between percent gold recovery and sulphide content.

 

13.2.5.3 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2015) – Column Leach Test Work

 

Column leach tests were conducted on each sample at crush sizes of 100% passing 25mm and 100% passing 12.5mm and were leached for 90 days. Results from the column leach tests for gold and silver are presented in Table 13-28.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-31

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Column test results on material crushed to 100% passing 25mm and 12.5mm show only minor recovery improvements with finer crushing with the exception of oxide and transitional material logged as hornfels and incipient hornfels, which benefitted from a 3% to 5% recovery increase for oxide material and 4% to 10% increase for transition material with finer crush size.

 

Table 13-28

 

KCA 2015 Column Leach Test Results by Lithology

Description Crush
Size,
mm
Calculated
Head,
g/t Au
Extracted,
% Au
  Calculated
Head,
g/t Ag
Extracted,
% Ag
  Calculated
Tail P80
Size,
mm
Consumption
NaCN,
kg/t
Addition
Hydrated
Lime,
kg/t
HF - Ox 11 25 1.060 78%   14.09 21%   16.52 1.39 1.00
HF - Ox 11 12.5 1.033 81%   13.28 32%   9.27 1.42 1.01
HFT - Hi 2 25 0.834 72%   23.67 31%   17.71 1.49 1.00
HFT - Hi 2 12.5 0.855 75%   22.74 46%   9.93 1.37 1.00
IHT - Hi 4 25 0.812 68%   17.90 25%   18.29 1.35 1.00
IHT - Hi 4 12.5 0.858 73%   17.33 38%   9.92 1.37 1.00
HFT - Hi 8 25 1.095 72%   10.51 44%   18.32 1.44 1.01
HFT - Hi 8 12.5 0.973 74%   10.50 54%   10.16 1.52 1.02
HFT - Lo 1 25 0.817 61%   10.91 35%   18.06 1.51 0.95
HFT - Lo 1 12.5 0.788 63%   10.82 51%   9.51 1.33 0.95
HFT - Lo 7 25 0.880 63%   5.32 41%   17.58 1.30 0.99
HFT - Lo 7 12.5 0.912 70%   4.97 62%   9.84 1.79 0.99
IH - Ox 12 25 0.610 59%   16.22 22%   18.75 1.22 1.01
IH - Ox 12 12.5 0.589 63%   15.98 40%   9.90 1.59 1.01
IHT - Lo 3 25 0.911 57%   23.25 33%   18.26 1.47 1.01
IHT - Lo 3 12.5 0.932 58%   22.04 49%   9.74 1.45 1.01
OX - Ox 9 25 0.269 73%   9.79 12%   18.66 1.41 1.01
OX - Ox 9 12.5 0.281 74%   9.58 22%   9.77 1.54 1.01
OX - Ox 10 25 0.729 78%   11.55 2%   17.66 0.89 1.01
OX - Ox 10 12.5 0.765 79%   10.95 4%   10.01 0.76 1.01
PC - Ox 13 25 0.557 60%   14.35 30%   18.10 1.24 0.93
PC - Ox 13 12.5 0.554 55%   14.56 36%   13.661 1.25 0.93
PCT - Hi 6 25 1.069 72%   11.87 37%   17.64 1.52 1.01
PCT - Hi 6 12.5 1.087 69%   11.33 45%   9.51 1.24 1.04
PCT - Lo 5 25 0.922 37%   43.26 50%   18.19 1.56 1.01
PCT - Lo 5 12.5 0.989 26%   49.68 56%   9.06 1.54 1.01

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-32

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

13.3 Orla (2019)

 

Orla commissioned KCA in 2018 to perform confirmatory test work on the Camino Rojo ore. The Camino Rojo ore body contains three basic material types which include Oxide, Sulphide, and Transition material. The test work included column leach and bottle roll leach tests on each of the primary ore types (Kp Oxide, Ki Oxide, Transition Hi and Transition Lo) as well as physical characterization and cyanide neutralization test work. These material types have been further defined into distinct groups beyond the basic classifications. Oxide material has been classified relative to the material’s K alteration values from ICP testing and include the Kp (pervasive) and Ki (incipient) oxides. Transition material has been classified based on oxidation level via qualitative indicators which include Transition-Hi (60 to 90% oxidized), Transition-Lo (30 to 60% oxidized), and Transition-S (Sulphide, <30% oxidized). Transition-S material is not included in the Mineral Resource for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

13.3.1 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019)

 

Results for the 2019 KCA test program summarized herein are extracted from the KCA laboratory report titled “Camino Rojo Project Kp, Ki, TrSx(H), TrHi and TrLo Composites Report on Metallurgical Test Work, June 2019” (KCA, 2019).

 

The 2019 KCA test program was conducted on PQ core material which was used to generate seven composites based on material types. Figure 13-5 presents the location of the drill holes for the samples and a description of material received is presented in Table 13-29. Details on the composite generation are presented in Table 13-30.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 13-5 Sample Drill Hole Locations for KCA 2019 Test Program

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-34

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-29
Description of Received Material – KCA 2019

KCA
Sample
No.

 

Client I.D.

 

Received
Weight,
kg
 
 
82401 A CRMET18-001, 54 to 135 metres 1,030.0  
82402 A CRMET18-002, 2 to 143 metres 1,472.5  
82403 A CRMET18-003, 2 to 106 metres 1,037.5  
82417 A CRMET18-010, 3 to 84 metres 909.5  
82418 A CRMET18-010, 84 to 108 metres 258.5  
82419 A CRMET18-011, 2 to 75 metres 745.5  
82420 A CRMET18-011, 75 to 126 metres 511.0  
82457 A CRMET18-014, 2 to 160 metres 1,550.5  
82421 A CRMET18-004, 2 to 129.5 metres 1,278.1  
82422 A CRMET18-005, 31 to 122 metres 954.0  
82423 A CRMET18-008, 4 to 126 metres 1,386.5  
82424 A CRMET18-009, 14 to 134 metres 1,449.0  
82425 A CRMET18-005, 4 to 31 metres 293.1  
82426 A CRMET18-006, 2 to 75 metres 886.3  
82427 A CRMET18-007, 26 to 100 metres 897.2  
82428 A CRMET18-012, 3 to 75.5 metres 863.5  
82429 A CRMET18-013, 2 to 70 metres 807.5  
82430 A CRMET18-001, 135 to 212 metres 973.0  
82431 A CRMET18-002, 143 to 162 metres 264.3  
82432 A CRMET18-003, 106 to 117 metres 148.9  
82433 A CRMET18-008, 126 to 142 metres 214.6  
82434 A CRMET18-009, 165 to 170 metres 66.0  
82435 A CRMET18-010, 135 to 149 metres 1,088.4  
82436 A CRMET18-010, 175 to 250 metres  
82437 A CRMET18-001, 212 to 245 metres 459.4  
82438 A CRMET18-002, 162 to 255 metres 1,185.4  
82439 A CRMET18-003, 117 to 127 metres 126.8  
82440 A CRMET18-003, 139 to 160 metres 292.3  
82441 A CRMET18-005, 122 to 162 metres 530.0  
82442 A CRMET18-005, 196 to 227 metres 409.0  
82443 A CRMET18-008, 142 to 180 metres 488.0  
82444 A CRMET18-009, 148 to 165 metres 219.0  
82445 A CRMET18-010, 108 to 120 metres 179.0  
82446 A CRMET18-010, 149 to 175 metres 380.0  
82447 A CRMET18-001, 245 to 279 metres 493.5  
82448 A CRMET18-005, 162 to 196 metres 445.0  
82449 A CRMET18-005, 227 to 237.5 metres 138.4  
82550 A CRMET18-009, 134 to 148 metres 184.5  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-35

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-30
Composite Generation Information – KCA 2019

KCA Composite
No.
KCA Sample
No.
Description Client I.D. Weight to Composite, kg  
 
82404 A 82401 A Kp 4400 Composite CRMET18-001, 54 to 135 metres 300.0  
82402 A CRMET18-002, 2 to 143 metres 300.0  
82403 A CRMET18-003, 2 to 106 metres 600.0  
Total Weight, kg 1,200.0  
           
82451 A 82417 A Kp 4300 Composite CRMET18-010, 3 to 84 metres 139.3  
82418 A CRMET18-010, 84 to 108 metres 158.4  
82419 A CRMET18-011, 2 to 75 metres 114.2  
82420 A CRMET18-011, 75 to 126 metres 313.1  
82457 A CRMET18-014, 2 to 160 metres 475.0  
Total Weight, kg 1,200.0  
           
82452 A 82421 A Kp 4500/4650 Composite CRMET18-004, 2 to 129.5 metres 689.2  
82422 A CRMET18-005, 31 to 122 metres 128.6  
82423 A CRMET18-008, 4 to 126 metres 186.9  
82424 A CRMET18-009, 14 to 134 metres 195.3  
Total Weight, kg 1,200.0  
           
82453 A 82425 A Ki Composite CRMET18-005, 4 to 31 metres 55.7  
82426 A CRMET18-006, 2 to 75 metres 168.4  
82427 A CRMET18-007, 26 to 100 metres 341.0  
82428 A CRMET18-012, 3 to 75.5 metres 328.1  
82429 A CRMET18-013, 2 to 70 metres 306.8  
Total Weight, kg 1,200.0  
           
82454 A 82430 A TrHi Composite CRMET18-001, 135 to 212 metres 423.8  
82431 A CRMET18-002, 143 to 162 metres 115.1  
82432 A CRMET18-003, 106 to 117 metres 64.9  
82433 A CRMET18-008, 126 to 142 metres 93.5  
82434 A CRMET18-009, 165 to 170 metres 28.8  
82435 A CRMET18-010, 135 to 149 metres 474.0  
82436 A CRMET18-010, 175 to 250 metres  
Total Weight, kg 1,200.0  
           
82455 A 82437 A TrLo Composite CRMET18-001, 212 to 245 metres 129.1  
82438 A CRMET18-002, 162 to 255 metres 333.2  
82439 A CRMET18-003, 117 to 127 metres 35.7  
82440 A CRMET18-003, 139 to 160 metres 82.2  
82441 A CRMET18-005, 122 to 162 metres 149.0  
82442 A CRMET18-005, 196 to 227 metres 115.0  
82443 A CRMET18-008, 142 to 180 metres 137.2  
82444 A CRMET18-009, 148 to 165 metres 61.6  
82445 A CRMET18-010, 108 to 120 metres 50.3  
82446 A CRMET18-010, 149 to 175 metres 106.8  
Total Weight, kg 1,200.0  
           
82556 A 82447 A TrSx(H) Composite CRMET18-001, 245 to 279 metres 195.6  
82448 A CRMET18-005, 162 to 196 metres 176.4  
82449 A CRMET18-005, 227 to 237.5 metres 54.9  
82550 A CRMET18-009, 134 to 148 metres 73.1  
Total Weight, kg 500.0  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-36

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

13.3.1.1 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019) – Head Analyses & Physical Characterization

 

Material from each composite was assayed for gold and silver content by standard fire assay and wet chemistry methods and results are presented in Table 13-31 along with the expected / target grade based on previous drill results. Gold grades ranged between 0.26 and 1.5 g/t and were generally slightly lower than the expected grades. Silver grades ranged between 6.8 and 27.9 g/t and were typically close to the expected grades with the exception of the Trans-Lo and Trans-Sx composites which were significantly higher than expected.

 

Composite samples were also assayed by quantitative methods for carbon and sulphur, copper and mercury and lead and zinc which are presented in Table 13-32, Table 13-33 and Table 13-34, respectively. Based on these results, the material does show some organic carbon with higher percentages associated with the transition and sulphide composites. Mercury is present in most of the samples and will require treatment for recovery during operations. Copper concentrations are low and are not expected to present any issues with cyanide leaching. Semi-quantitative multi-element analyses for whole rock constituents were also performed and are presented in Table 13-35 and Table 13-36.

 

Table 13-31
Head Analyses Gold & Silver – KCA 2019

KCA
Sample
No.
Description Client
Expected
Grade,
g/t Au
Average
Assay,
g/t Au
Client
Expected
Grade,
g/t Ag
Average
Assay,
g/t Ag
82404 C Kp 4400 Composite 0.77 0.550 14.4 12.51
82451 C Kp 4300 Composite 1.07 0.820 12.4 11.69
82452 C Kp 4500/4650 Composite 0.63 0.537 14.6 16.54
82453 C Ki Composite 0.35 0.264 7.3 6.79
82454 C TrHi Composite 0.97 0.983 25.3 30.39
82455 C TrLo Composite 0.85 0.749 16.2 37.90
82456 C TrSx(H) Composite 0.98 1.524 15.2 28.90
Note - The detection limit for silver with FAAS finish is 0.21 g/t.
Note - For the purpose of calculation a value of 1/2 the detection limit is utilized for assays less than the detection limit.

 

Table 13-32
Head Analyses Carbon & Sulphur – KCA 2019

KCA
Sample
No.
Description Total
Carbon,
%
Organic
Carbon,
%
Inorganic
Carbon,
%
Total
Sulphur,
%
Sulphide
Sulphur,
%
Sulphate
Sulphur,
%
82404 C Kp 4400 Composite 0.85 0.03 0.81 0.07 0.02 0.05
82451 C Kp 4300 Composite 0.44 0.06 0.37 0.27 0.01 0.26
82452 C Kp 4500/4650 Composite 0.40 0.04 0.36 0.13 <0.01 0.13
82453 C Ki Composite 1.23 0.03 1.20 0.04 <0.01 0.03
82454 C TrHi Composite 0.33 0.13 0.20 0.67 0.35 0.33
82455 C TrLo Composite 0.54 0.18 0.36 1.82 1.34 0.48
82456 C TrSx(H) Composite 0.77 0.22 0.55 5.50 4.60 0.90

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-37

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-33
Head Analyses Mercury & Copper – KCA 2019

KCA
Sample No.
Description Total Mercury,
mg/kg
Total Copper,
mg/kg
Cyanide Soluble Copper,
mg/kg
Cyanide Soluble Copper,
%
82404 C Kp 4400 Composite 0.02 97 6.91 7%
82451 C Kp 4300 Composite <0.02 114 6.41 6%
82452 C Kp 4500/4650 Composite 0.03 88 5.92 7%
82453 C Ki Composite 0.08 45 1.99 4%
82454 C TrHi Composite 0.04 122 67.65 55%
82455 C TrLo Composite 0.05 83 64.55 78%
82456 C TrSx(H) Composite 0.05 85 57.30 67%
Note - The cyanide soluble copper is an average of two cyanide shake analyses.  

 

Table 13-34
Head Analyses Lead & Zinc – KCA 2019

KCA
Sample No.
Description Lead,
mg/kg
Zinc,
mg/kg
82404 C Kp 4400 Composite 2010 2470
82451 C Kp 4300 Composite 4210 3140
82452 C Kp 4500/4650 Composite 3630 4720
82453 C Ki Composite 1460 1980
82454 C TrHi Composite 2480 6250
82455 C TrLo Composite 2100 5950
82456 C TrSx(H) Composite 2060 8030

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-38

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-35
Head Analyses Multi-Element Analysis – KCA 2019

Constituent Unit Kp 4400 Composite
82404 C
Kp 4300 Composite
82451 C
Kp 4500/4650 Composite
82452 C
Ki Composite
82453 C
TrHi Composite
82454 C
TrLo Composite
82455 C
TrSx(H) Composite
82456 C
Al % 7.31 7.16 7.05 6.40 7.09 6.69 6.31
As mg/kg 660 811 547 523 630 503 585
Ba mg/kg 7.81 1040 1060 497 1220 1190 1130
Bi mg/kg 27 11 3 3 8 5 12
C(total) % 0.85 0.44 0.40 1.23 0.33 0.54 0.77
C(organic) % 0.03 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.13 0.18 0.22
C(inorganic) % 0.81 0.37 0.36 1.20 0.20 0.36 0.55
Ca % 2.87 1.44 1.37 3.97 1.14 1.59 1.91
Cd mg/kg 35 36 37 37 75 91 96
Co mg/kg 18 16 14 14 11 11 17
Cr mg/kg 68 76 77 64 79 75 80
Cu(total) mg/kg 97 114 88 45 122 83 85
Cu(cyanide soluble) mg/kg 6.91 6.41 5.92 1.99 67.65 64.55 57.30
Fe % 4.91 5.69 4.96 3.54 5.82 4.70 6.09
Hg mg/kg 0.02 <0.02 0.03 0.08 0.04 0.05 0.05
K % 4.61 6.19 5.88 2.99 7.20 6.75 7.14
Mg % 0.83 0.65 0.63 1.15 0.41 0.37 0.59
Mn mg/kg 1130 775 958 836 223 362 511
Mo mg/kg 2 4 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Na % 0.33 0.44 0.21 0.64 0.20 0.19 0.16
Ni mg/kg 53 47 53 53 40 37 46
Pb mg/kg 2010 4210 3630 1460 2480 2100 2060
S(total) % 0.07 0.27 0.13 0.04 0.67 1.82 5.50
S(sulphide) % 0.02 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.35 1.34 4.60
S(sulphate) % 0.05 0.26 0.13 0.03 0.33 0.48 0.90
Sb mg/kg 30 37 24 13 22 16 11
Se mg/kg 12 13 13 11 48 39 29
Sr mg/kg 184 271 208 151 190 212 197
Te mg/kg 14 18 11 8 17 15 21
Ti % 0.32 0.21 0.20 0.29 0.21 0.21 0.19
V mg/kg 177 173 182 175 150 133 130
W mg/kg 33 39 54 23 69 68 100
Zn mg/kg 2470 3140 4720 1980 6250 5950 8030

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-39

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 13-36
Head Analyses Whole Rock Analysis – KCA 2019

Constituent Unit Kp 4400 Composite
82404 C
Kp 4300 Composite
82451 C
Kp 4500/4650 Composite
82452 C
Ki Composite
82453 C
TrHi Composite
82454 C
SiO2 % 59.5   58.4   61.68   58.35   60.0  
Si %   27.82   27.30   28.84   27.28   28.05
Al2O3 % 14.3   14.7   13.82   13.83   14.4  
Al %   7.57   7.78   7.32   7.32   7.62
Fe2O3 % 6.92   7.65   7.06   5.17   9.20  
Fe %   4.84   5.35   4.94   3.62   6.43
CaO % 3.98   1.95   2.07   6.03   1.73  
Ca %   2.84   1.39   1.48   4.31   1.24
MgO % 1.48   1.12   1.04   2.09   0.91  
Mg %   0.89   0.68   0.63   1.26   0.55
Na2O % 0.39   0.34   0.32   0.97   0.30  
Na %   0.29   0.25   0.24   0.72   0.22
K2O % 5.72   8.08   7.37   4.02   7.85  
K %   4.75   6.71   6.12   3.34   6.51
TiO2 % 0.71   0.76   0.74   0.65   0.73  
Ti %   0.43   0.46   0.44   0.39   0.44
MnO % 0.15   0.11   0.12   0.11   0.03  
Mn %   0.12   0.09   0.09   0.09   0.02
SrO % 0.01   0.02   0.01   0.01   0.01  
Sr %   0.01   0.02   0.01   0.01   0.01
BaO % 0.08   0.12   0.11   0.05   0.14  
Ba %   0.07   0.11   0.10   0.04   0.13
Cr2O3 % 0.01   0.01   0.01   0.01   0.01  
Cr %   0.01   0.01   0.01   0.01   0.01
P2O5 % 0.17   0.21   0.14   0.16   0.19  
P %   0.07   0.09   0.06   0.07   0.08
LOI1090°C % 6.13   5.04   4.69   8.14   4.55  
SUM % 99.55   98.51   99.18   99.59   100.05  

Note: The SUM is the total of the oxide constituents and the loss on ignition.

Note - For the purpose of calculation a value of 1/2 the detection limit is utilized for assays less than the detection limit.

 

Cyanide shakes tests were conducted to evaluate preg-robbing tendencies in the different material composites. Direct and spiked cyanide shake tests were performed with preg-robbing tendencies being determined by comparing the spiked shake test extraction and the direct shake test extractions to determine a % preg-rob.

 

Typically, % preg-robbing greater than 10% indicates preg-robbing tendencies. The results indicate no preg-robbing tendencies for the oxide composites with observed moderate preg-robbing tendencies with all of the transition and sulphide samples. The preg-robbing results show a general trend of increased preg robbing tendencies with increased organic carbon content.

 

A portion of each of the composites were submitted to Hazen Research in Golden, Colorado for comminution testing. Comminution test results are presented in Table 13-37.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-40

 

 

 

  

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

   

Table 13-37

 

Phisical Characterization Test Work Summary – KCA 2019

KCA
Sample No.
Client
I.D.
Crusher Work Index Abrasion Index  
kWh/short ton kWh/metric
tonne
Ai, g  
 
82405 A Kp 4400 10.8 11.9 0.0286  
82458 A Ki 10.4 11.5 0.0262  
82459 A TriHi 10.5 11.6 0.1764  
82460 A TriLo 10.1 11.2 0.2286  
82461 A TrSx(H) 10.6 11.7 0.2164  

  

The results indicate average hardness with low to moderate abrasion.

 

13.3.1.2 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019) – Bottle Roll Leach Tests

 

Bottle roll leach testing was conducted on material from each composite (Kp 4400 Composite, Kp 4300 Composite, Kp 4500/4650 Composite, Ki Composite, TrHi Composite, TrLo Composite and TrSx(H) Composite). A 1,000-gram portion of head material was pulverized to a target of 100% passing 0.15mm. Results from the bottle roll tests are presented in Table 13-38 and Table 13-39 for gold and silver, respectively.

 

Table 13-38

 

Bottle Roll Leach Test Summary, Gold – KCA 2019

KCA
Sample
No.
Description Target
P80
Size,
mm
Calculated
Head,
g/t Au
Extracted,
g/t Au
Avg.
Tails,
g/t
Au
Au
Extracted,
%
Leach
Time,
hours
Consumption
NaCN,
kg/t
Addition
Ca(OH)2,
kg/t
82404 C Kp 4400 Composite 0.075 0.569 0.494 0.075 87% 96 0.09 2.00
82451 C Kp 4300 Composite 0.075 1.020 0.933 0.087 92% 96 0.33 1.75
82452 C Kp 4500/4650 Composite 0.075 0.494 0.409 0.086 83% 96 0.33 1.75
82453 C Ki Composite 0.075 0.170 0.124 0.046 73% 96 0.19 1.75
82454 C TrHi Composite 0.075 0.976 0.751 0.225 77% 96 0.81 1.75
82454 C TrHi Composite 0.075 0.878 0.647 0.231 74% 96 0.64 1.25
  Average:   0.927 0.699 0.228 76%      
82455 C TrLo Composite 0.075 0.683 0.161 0.523 23% 96 0.75 1.50
82456 C TrSx(H) Composite 0.075 2.337 1.138 1.198 49% 96 1.34 1.50
82456 C TrSx(H) Composite 0.075 3.742 2.216 1.526 59% 96 1.99 1.00
  Average:   3.039 1.677 1.362 54%      

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-41

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Table 13-39

 

Bottle Roll Leach Test Summary, Silver – KCA 2019

KCA
Sample
No.
Description Target
P80
Size,
mm
Calculated
Head,
g/t Ag
Extracted,
g/t Ag
Avg.
Tails,
g/t
Ag
Ag
Extracted,
%
Leach
Time,
hours
Consumption
NaCN,
kg/t
Addition
Ca(OH)2,
kg/t
82404 C Kp 4400 Composite 0.075 12.80 6.49 6.31 51% 96 0.09 2.00
82451 C Kp 4300 Composite 0.075 12.21 6.05 6.15 50% 96 0.33 1.75
82452 C Kp 4500/4650 Composite 0.075 17.30 8.09 9.21 47% 96 0.33 1.75
82453 C Ki Composite 0.075 6.67 1.57 5.11 23% 96 0.19 1.75
82454 C TrHi Composite 0.075 29.53 22.02 7.51 75% 96 0.81 1.75
82454 C TrHi Composite 0.075 31.50 23.79 7.71 76% 96 0.64 1.25
  Average:   30.52 22.91 7.61 75%      
82455 C TrLo Composite 0.075 36.34 15.44 20.90 42% 96 0.75 1.50
82456 C TrSx(H) Composite 0.075 29.74 20.78 8.96 70% 96 1.34 1.50
82456 C TrSx(H) Composite 0.075 36.22 32.31 3.91 89% 96 1.99 1.00
  Average:   32.98 26.55 6.43 80%      

  

For the pulverized composite material, gold extractions ranged from 23% to 92% based on calculated heads and silver extractions ranged between 23% and 89%. The results indicate that the oxide composites are amenable to cyanide leaching. Transition material recoveries for gold were lower compared to the oxide.

 

13.3.1.3 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019) – Agglomeration Test Work

 

Preliminary agglomeration test work and compacted permeability test work were conducted on portions of each composite. Agglomeration tests were conducted utilizing portions of the material at a crushed size of 100% passing 12.5 millimetres and agglomerated with 0, 2, 4 and 8 kilograms of cement per tonne of material. Based on KCA’s criteria, all samples passed up to an effective heap height of 90m and cement agglomeration would not be required for material crushed to 12.5mm or coarser.

 

13.3.1.4 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019) – Column Leach Test Work

 

Column leach tests were conducted utilizing material crushed to 100% passing 150, 50 and 12.5mm for each composite (Kp 4400 Composite, Kp 4300 Composite, Kp 4500/4650 Composite, Ki Composite, TrHi Composite and TrLo Composite) and 50mm for the TrSx(H) Composite. During testing, the material was leached for 82, 85, 95 and 114 days with a sodium cyanide solution.

 

The column leach test results are presented in Table 13-40 and Table 13-41 for gold and silver, respectively.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-42

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Results indicate gold recoveries for the Kp oxide material ranging between 44% and 82% with results for the Kp 4500/4650 being generally lower than the other Kp oxide results and silver recoveries being between 3 to 24%. Ki gold recoveries were lower and ranged from 47 to 64% with silver extractions between 1 to 5 %. Metal extractions for TrHi ranged between 44 to 64% gold and 5 to 49 % for silver. TrLo metal recoveries ranged between 30 to 41% for gold and 10 to 58 % for silver. Gold recoveries for the TrSx(H) Composite were low at 33%, indicating that the sulphide material is not amenable to direct leaching and supports the mine modelling treating all Tr(Sx) as waste.

 

In general, recoveries improved with finer crushing with silver recoveries being more sensitive to crush size than gold. Recovery improvements were more significant for 150mm to 50mm than 50mm to 12.5mm. Tests indicate there is not a strong correlation between head grade and metal recovery for gold; however, silver recoveries appear to improve with higher head grades.

 

After completion of leaching, columns were allowed to drain for 168 hours. After draining, select columns at the 50mm crush size were utilized for water rinsing or chemical neutralization using the INCO SO2 method. Results are presented in Figure 13-6 for water rinsing and Figure 13-7 for chemical neutralization.

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-43

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Table 13-40

 

Column Leach Tests Results Summary, Gold – KCA 2019

KCA
Sample
No.
Description Crush
Size,
mm
Calculated
Head,
g Au/MT
Extracted,
g Au/MT
Weighted
Avg. Tail
Screen,
g Au/MT
Extracted,
% Au
Days of
Leach
Days of
Wash/Detox
Consumption
NaCN,
kg/t
Addition
Hydrated
Lime,
kg/t
Addition
Cement,
kg/t
82404 A Kp 4400 Composite 150 0.538 0.357 0.181 66% 114 -- 0.98 1.51 0.00
82404 B Kp 4400 Composite 50 0.583 0.427 0.156 73% 114 31w 0.82 2.00 0.00
82404 C Kp 4400 Composite 12.5 0.619 0.497 0.122 80% 114 -- 0.99 2.37 0.00
Avg.     0.580                
Std. Dev.     0.041                
RSD, %     7%                
                       
82451 A Kp 4300 Composite 150 1.003 0.687 0.316 69% 82 -- 0.38 1.80 0.00
82451 B Kp 4300 Composite 50 0.877 0.711 0.166 81% 95 21d 1.09 1.76 0.00
82451 C Kp 4300 Composite 12.5 0.849 0.694 0.155 82% 85 -- 0.97 1.77 0.00
Avg.     0.910                
Std. Dev.     0.082                
RSD, %     9%                
                       
82452 A Kp 4500/4650 Composite 150 0.547 0.241 0.306 44% 82 -- 0.39 1.68 0.00
82452 B Kp 4500/4650 Composite 50 0.526 0.310 0.216 59% 95 -- 0.79 1.76 0.00
82452 C Kp 4500/4650 Composite 12.5 0.542 0.371 0.171 68% 85 -- 0.97 1.76 0.00
Avg.     0.538                
Std. Dev.     0.011                
RSD, %     2%                
                       
82453 A Ki Composite 150 0.333 0.155 0.178 47% 82 -- 0.50 1.73 0.00
82453 B Ki Composite 50 0.306 0.189 0.117 62% 95 21w 0.77 1.77 0.00
82453 C Ki Composite 12.5 0.279 0.178 0.101 64% 85 -- 0.95 1.77 0.00
Avg.     0.306                
Std. Dev.     0.027                
RSD, %     9%                
                       
82454 A TrHi Composite 150 0.881 0.385 0.496 44% 82 -- 0.32 1.72 0.00
82454 B TrHi Composite 50 1.225 0.565 0.660 46% 95 39d 0.61 1.63 0.00
82454 C TrHi Composite 12.5 1.042 0.662 0.380 64% 85 -- 0.75 1.77 0.00
Avg.     1.049                
Std. Dev.     0.172                
RSD, %     16%                
                       
82455 A TrLo Composite 150 0.843 0.257 0.586 30% 82 -- 0.39 1.72 0.00
82455 B TrLo Composite 50 0.856 0.347 0.509 41% 95 25d 0.88 1.63 0.00
82455 C TrLo Composite 12.5 0.749 0.304 0.445 41% 85 -- 0.95 1.52 0.00
Avg.     0.816                
Std. Dev.     0.058                
RSD, %     7%                
                       
82456 A TrSx(H) Composite 50 1.277 0.423 0.854 33% 95 21w 0.48 1.78 0.00

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-44

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Table 13-41

 

Column Leach Tests Results Summary, Silver – KCA 2019

KCA
Sample
No.
Description Crush
Size,
mm
Calculated
Head,
g/t Ag
Extracted,
g/t Ag
Weighted
Avg. Tail
Screen,
g/t Ag
Extracted,
% Ag
Days of
Leach
Days of
Wash/Deto
x
Consumption
NaCN,
kg/t
Addition
Hydrated
Lime,
kg/t
Addition
Cement,
kg/t
82404 A Kp 4400 Composite 150 9.44 0.47 8.97 5% 114 -- 0.98 1.51 0.00
82404 B Kp 4400 Composite 50 10.75 1.00 9.75 9% 114 31w 0.82 2.00 0.00
82404 C Kp 4400 Composite 12.5 11.58 2.16 9.42 19% 114 -- 0.99 2.37 0.00
Avg.     10.59                
Std. Dev.     1.08                
RSD, %     10%                
                       
82451 A Kp 4300 Composite 150 10.31 0.35 9.96 3% 82 -- 0.38 1.80 0.00
82451 B Kp 4300 Composite 50 11.62 0.67 10.95 6% 95 21d 1.09 1.76 0.00
82451 C Kp 4300 Composite 12.5 9.32 1.24 8.08 13% 85 -- 0.97 1.77 0.00
Avg.     10.42                
Std. Dev.     1.15                
RSD, %     11%                
                       
82452 A Kp 4500/4650 Composite 150 15.32 0.70 14.62 5% 82 -- 0.39 1.68 0.00
82452 B Kp 4500/4650 Composite 50 16.50 1.31 15.19 8% 95 -- 0.79 1.76 0.00
82452 C Kp 4500/4650 Composite 12.5 16.86 4.09 12.77 24% 85 -- 0.97 1.76 0.00
Avg.     16.23                
Std. Dev.     0.81                
RSD, %     5%                
                       
82453 A Ki Composite 150 5.06 0.07 4.99 1% 82 -- 0.50 1.73 0.00
82453 B Ki Composite 50 7.17 0.28 6.89 4% 95 21w 0.77 1.77 0.00
82453 C Ki Composite 12.5 6.52 0.33 6.19 5% 85 -- 0.95 1.77 0.00
Avg.     6.25                
Std. Dev.     1.08                
RSD, %     17%                
                       
82454 A TrHi Composite 150 27.79 1.36 26.31 5% 82 -- 0.32 1.72 0.00
82454 B TrHi Composite 50 29.71 4.69 25.02 16% 95 39d 0.61 1.63 0.00
82454 C TrHi Composite 12.5 23.36 11.35 12.01 49% 85 -- 0.75 1.77 0.00
Avg.     26.95                
Std. Dev.     3.26                
RSD, %     12%                
                       
82455 A TrLo Composite 150 18.92 1.95 16.97 10% 82 -- 0.39 1.72 0.00
82455 B TrLo Composite 50 16.67 4.63 12.04 28% 95 25d 0.88 1.63 0.00
82455 C TrLo Composite 12.5 16.12 9.38 6.74 58% 85 -- 0.95 1.52 0.00
Avg.     17.24                
Std. Dev.     1.48                
RSD, %     9%                
                       
82456 A TrSx(H) Composite 50 20.67 6.43 14.24 31% 95 21w 0.48 1.78 0.00

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-45

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Figure 13-6 Water Wash Summary

  

Figure 13-7 Detoxification Summary, INCO SO2

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-46

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

13.3.1.5 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2019) – Diagnostic Leach Test Work

 

Diagnostic leach testing was utilized to determine the metal association within the column tailings material for composites Kp 4500/4650 and Ki by leaching the material in five (5) sequential stages with various pre-treatments. A 1,000-gram portion of the column tailings material was pulverized to a target size of 80% passing 0.075 millimetres and utilized for the initial agitated leaching stage. For each additional sequential stage, the entire tails residue was utilized.

 

The results of the diagnostic leach testing for gold and silver extraction are summarized in Table 13-42. A chart summarizing the extractions from the individual phases of leaching is presented in Figure 13-8.

 

Table 13-42

 

Diagnostic Leach Test Summary – KCA 2019

Kp 4500/4650 Composite - Column Tail Assay 0.171 g/t Au
KCA
Sample
No.
KCA
Test No.
Metal Association Calculated
Head,
g/t Au
Au
Extracted,
%
Cumulative
Extracted,
%
82483 83183 A Direct Cyanide Soluble Gold 0.179 63% 63%
  83184 A, C Calcite 0.067 4% 66%
  83185 A, C Dolomite and Iron Oxide 0.060 11% 78%
  83186 A, C Pyrites and Sulphides 0.040 2% 80%
  83187 A Carbonaceous 0.036 0% 80%
  -- Encapsulated Gold -- 20% 100%
  Overall -- 0.179 100% --
           
Ki Composite - Column Tail Assay 0.101 g/t Au      
KCA
Sample
No.
KCA
Test No.
Metal Association Calculated
Head,
g/t Au
Au
Extracted,
%
Cumulative
Extracted,
%
82492 83183 B Direct Cyanide Soluble Gold 0.131 54% 54%
  83184 B, D Calcite 0.060 10% 64%
  83185 B, D Dolomite and Iron Oxide 0.047 20% 86%
  83186 B, D Pyrites and Sulphides 0.021 2% 88%
  83187 B Carbonaceous 0.019 0% 88%
  -- Encapsulated Gold -- 15% 100%
  Overall -- 0.131 100% --

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-47

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Figure 13-8 Diagnostic Leach Results Summary – KCA 2019

  

The diagnostic leaching indicates that the majority of the reduced recovery is associated with encapsulation of the metals and none associated with carbonaceous material.

 

13.4 Conclusions from Metallurgical Programs

 

Based on the metallurgical tests completed on the Project, key design parameters for the Project include:

 

· Crush size of 100% passing 38mm (P80 28mm).
· Estimated gold recoveries (including 2% field deduction) of:
o 70% for Kp Oxide;
o 56% for Ki Oxide;
o 60% for Trans-Hi; and
o 40% for Trans-Lo
· Estimated silver recoveries (including 3% field deduction) of:
o 11% for Kp Oxide;
o 15% for Ki Oxide;
o 27% for Trans-Hi; and
o 34% for Trans-Lo.
· Design leach cycle of 80 days.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-48

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

· Agglomeration with cement not required for permeability or stability.
· Average cyanide consumption of 0.35 kg/t ore.
· Average lime consumption of 1.25 kg/t ore.

 

The key design parameters are based on a substantial number of metallurgical tests including 107 column leach tests with 85 of the columns being performed on samples representative of domains in the current deposit model. These 85 representative samples from documented drill holes with good spatial distribution in the proposed pit include 41 columns tests on Kp Oxide material, 7 column tests on Ki Oxide material, 16 column tests on Trans-Hi material and 21 column tests on Trans-Lo material. The 22 non-representative columns were excluded based on the following criteria:

 

· Column on Trans-S or sulphide material which is not considered in the Mineral Reserve.
· Mix of Tran-S or other material types.
· Samples taken from outside of the proposed pit area.

 

An additional 54 bottle roll leach tests with direct correlations with the column tests have been included as part of the evaluation to support these results and conclusions, which are detailed in the following sections.

 

In general, the Camino Rojo deposit shows variability in gold and silver recoveries based on material type and geological domain with preg-robbing organic carbon being the only significant deleterious element identified, which is primarily associated with the transition material at depth along the outer edges of the deposit. Recoveries for the oxide material are good and will yield acceptable results using conventional heap leaching methods with cyanide. Recoveries for the transition material are lower compared with the oxide material for conventional leaching with some areas of transition showing reasonably high recoveries. Reagent consumptions for all material types are reasonably low.

 

Preg robbing presents a low to moderate risk to the overall Project; however, a significant investigation by Orla into the preg robbing material as well as preg-robbing test work completed by KCA indicates that preg robbing material will most likely not be encountered until later in the Project life and can be mitigated by proper ore control.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-49

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

13.4.1 Crush Size and Recovery

 

The column leach recovery by crush size was analysed to determine the effect of crush size on recovery for each material type. Column tests were conducted on crushed product sizes ranging from a P80 of 7mm to a P80 of nearly 118mm (P80 sizes were estimated for the SGS data set). These data were aggregated and plotted against recoveries for both gold and silver for each material classification type. Trend lines were then used to establish projected recoveries. Crushed product size vs. recovery results are presented in Figure 13-9 through Figure 13-12 for Kp Oxide, Ki Oxide, Trans-Hi and Trans-Lo material types, respectively.

 

 

Figure 13-9 Kp Oxide Recovery vs. Crush Size

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-50

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 13-10 Ki Oxide Recovery vs. Crush Size

 

 

Figure 13-11 Trans-Hi Recovery vs. Crush Size

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-51

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

 

Figure 13-12 Trans-Lo Recovery vs. Crush Size

  

Results from the test work generally show improved recoveries with finer crushing with decreasing recovery improvements for gold at crush sizes finer that P80 25mm. Silver recoveries were significantly more sensitive to crush size than gold recoveries.

 

Based on the metallurgical test data, KCA recommends a crushed product size of 100% passing 38mm (P80 ~28mm) in order to minimize crushing requirements and recover most of the recoverable gold and silver. Estimated recoveries by material type at P80 28mm, including a 2% field deduction for gold and 3% field deduction for silver, are presented in Table 13-43.

 

Table 13-43

 

Estimated Recoveries by Material Type for P80 28mm Crush Size

Material Type Au Ag
Kp Oxide 70% 11%
Ki Oxide 56% 15%
Transition-hi 60% 27%
Transition-lo 40% 34%

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing

Page 13-52

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

13.4.2 Leach Cycle

 

The Camino Rojo leach cycle has been estimated based on the column test work completed by evaluating the leach curves for gold and silver. The leach cycle considers tonnes of solution per tonne of material as well as total time required to reach the ultimate recovery in the column leach tests. Based on this data, the estimated leach cycle for the Camino Rojo material is 80 days. The expected tonnes of solutions per tonne of ore after the 80-day leach cycle is approximately 1.32. The recommended leach cycle is primarily based on the time required to leach and recover gold. The column tests indicate that silver leaches slower and increased silver recoveries would be expected with longer leach cycles.

 

13.4.3 Reagent Consumption Projection

 

13.4.3.1 Cyanide

 

The column leach test cyanide consumptions were studied by material type and adjusted to provide a basis for the expected field cyanide consumptions. In KCA’s experience, field cyanide consumptions are typically 25% to 50% of observed lab consumptions and have been estimated at 35% of the lab consumptions for the FS. The projected field consumptions by material type are shown in the Table 13-44.

 

Table 13-44

Projected Field Cyanide Consumptions by Material Type

Material
Type
NaCN Cons.
kg/t
Kp Ox 0.32
Ki Ox 0.38
Trans-Hi 0.37
Trans-Lo 0.37
Wt. Avg., All 0.35

 

For the purposes of the FS, the weighted average NaCN consumption based on total tonnes of ore is estimated 0.35 kg/t ore.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-53

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

13.4.3.2 Lime

 

Lime is required for pH control during leaching. Because hydrated lime was utilized in the lab leach tests, the laboratory lime consumptions are adjusted to accurately predict consumptions of quicklime (pebble lime, CaO) in the field. Estimated quicklime consumptions by material type are presented in Table 13-45.

 

Table 13-45

Projected Field Lime Consumptions by Material Type

Material
Type
Quicklime Cons.
kg/t
Kp Ox 1.26
Ki Ox 1.16
Trans-Hi 1.24
Trans-Lo 1.32
Wt. Avg. All 1.25

 

To ensure that proper pH is maintained throughout the heap, a lime consumption of 1.25 kg/t ore has been selected.

 

13.5 Preg Robbing Discussion

 

Preg robbing is a phenomenon where gold and gold-cyanide complexes are preferentially absorbed by carbonaceous, and to a lesser extent, other material. In addition to the direct vs. CIL bottle roll tests and cyanide shake tests completed by KCA to evaluate the potential for preg-robbing, an extensive campaign was completed by Orla and reviewed by KCA to further understand the preg robbing mechanism and affected material types and areas. The program included 828 tests completed on samples from drillhole intercepts in 2018 and 2019 which were evaluated for Au (CN) recovery, preg-robbing and organic carbon. Another 3,960 composite core samples tested by Goldcorp for organic carbon and preg-robbing were used as reference, though the majority of these were from the sulphide portion of the deposit.

 

Key observations from the preg robbing test work include:

 

· Overall, no strong correlation between organic carbon content and preg-robbing material. The correlation is more pronounced in less oxidized material.

 

· Preg robbing not strongly associated with Oxide material with less than 3% of tests showing preg rob values above 10%. Most of these are on samples taken from areas of waste in the current mine model.

 

· Higher preg rob values generally associated with the Trans-Lo material.

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-54

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

· Preg robbing appears to be primarily at depth in the transition material along the outer margins of the deposit.

 

· Approximately 2% of the recovered gold in the feasibility production model comes from areas with more than 10% preg-robbing test results. Material from these areas will be mined starting in year 4, with the bulk coming in years 6 and 7.

 

· 65% of the material from areas with greater than 10% preg-robbing test results that is planned to go to the heap is Trans-Lo.

 

Interbedded shale and sandstone layers of the Caracol Formation that host the Camino Rojo deposit contain variable amounts of organic carbon derived from the sediments that formed the rocks. During the alteration and mineralizing events that formed the deposit, the carbon was mobilized and depleted in the core of the deposit. Carbonate was similarly depleted, while potassium was increased through metasomatism, resulting in a high potassium, low carbonate and low carbon core to the deposit. In the outer parts of the deposit, and peripheral to it, organic carbon is still present. It typically occurs as grey/black, wispy, flattened, millimetre sized clots, lenses or layers in darker shale horizons. It is locally sub-graphitic and weakly sheared along mm-cm calcite rich bedding planes.

 

Spatial plots of organic carbon (OC) content confirm that higher organic carbon contents occur in the outer part of the deposit with an OC depleted zone in the centre. The Kp domain, which forms the central part of the deposit, is therefore generally lower in organic carbon than the Ki domain that surrounds it.

 

Overall, data shows a weak positive correlation between organic carbon and preg-robbing, but with significant variability (Figure 13-13). When results are divided by oxidation level, it is evident that in oxide material organic carbon most commonly does not cause preg-robbing conditions. This is postulated to be because the carbon has already been neutralized by absorbing other elements during the weathering process. In Trans_ Lo and Trans_sx material, there is a much stronger correlation between organic carbon and preg-robbing. Carbon, when present, is still available to absorb the gold. Correlation in Transition_Hi is between oxide and Transition_Lo as would be expected.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-55

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 13-13 Organic Carbon Versus Preg-Robbing

 

KCA considers preg-robbing values greater than 10% to be potentially problematic. Spatial analysis of the preg-robbing test results was undertaken and areas where most samples have greater than 10% preg-robbing results outlined. This indicates approximately 1.5 million tonnes, or 3.5%, of the 44.0 million tonnes of material going to the heap leach pad in the Feasibility Study mine schedule comes from areas with potential preg-robbing issues. The average grade is 0.59 g/t Au, representing 3% of the total contained gold ounces in the schedule. However, 65% of this material is Trans_Lo which has a lower recovery than other material. Therefore, estimated recovered gold from areas with greater than 10% preg-robbing is 2% of the total. Material that is potentially problematic does not come into the mine plan until year 4. Figure 13-14 shows areas with +10% peg-robbing test results.

 

Not all of the material with greater than 10% preg-robbing test results is expected to actually be preg-robbing. In the 2015 column test program, preg-robbing testing was performed on the composite material and material with 40 to 60% preg-robbing results had 55 to 72% Au recovery. See Figure 13-15. These results show that higher preg-robbing results do not necessarily indicate recovery problems.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-56

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 13-14 Areas with +10% Preg-Robbing Test Results

 

 

Figure 13-15 Recovery Versus Preg-Robbing

 

Because the correlation between preg-robbing tests and actual recovery problems is not certain and tests show that at least some material with high preg-robbing results will still get good recoveries, further testing of the material identified as potentially preg-robbing is recommended before this material is mined. This should include column testing.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-57

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

If there is still uncertainty during mining, potentially preg-robbing material should be stockpiled separately and tested further. If additional test work confirms the material is preg-robbing, it should either be put in the waste pile or on the top of the heap at the end of mine life.

 

13.6 Sulphide Mineralization Discussion

 

Metallurgical testing on the sulphide resource (Trans-S) has indicated that the material is not amenable to direct cyanide leaching with average gold recoveries of less than 25% and silver recoveries around 26%; however, the mineralization has demonstrated that gold, silver, lead and zinc can be recovered into concentrates that are of potentially marketable grade.

 

A possible process flowsheet for a sequential flotation process consists of an initial pre-flotation to remove organic carbon followed by lead flotation, zinc flotation, and pyrite/arsenopyrite flotation to recover additional precious metals. The pyrite/arsenopyrite concentrate would be oxidized to recover additional gold and silver by cyanide leaching. Payable products would be the Lead Concentrate, Zinc Concentrate, and Gold Silver doré recovered from the cyanide leaching of the pyrite/arsenopyrite concentrate. It is assumed that after oxidation 90% of the gold and silver can be recovered from the oxidized pyrite concentrate. Waste products would be the pre-flotation concentrate, the flotation tailings, and the leached residue of the pyrite/arsenopyrite concentrate. Table 13-46 presents the distribution of metals to the various products based on preliminary test work. 

 

Note that the sulphide material is not included as part of the Mineral Reserve for the FS and these numbers are only presented to provide guidance as to whether material could potentially be a Mineral Resource. The process flowsheet described above is based on commonly used metal recovery methods and the metallurgical test work to date is too preliminary to confirm these recoveries can be achieved or to determine the economic viability of the material.

 

Table 13-46
Distribution of Metals to Various Sulphide ProductsBased on Preliminary Test Work

Product Wt % Distribution %
    Pb Zn Au Ag
Flotation Feed 100 100 100 100 100
Lead Concentrate 0.3 60 1 49 44
Zinc Concentrate 0.6 1 64 2 7
Pyrite Concentrate 19.6 (15) (19) (39) (28)
Dore from leaching Pyrite Con NA NA NA 35 25
           
Total Recovery for resource estimate   60% 64% 86% 76%
           
Pre-flotation Concentrate 4.4 14 6 6 16
Pyrite Leach Residue 19.6 15 19 4 3
Flotation Tailings 75.1 10 10 4 5

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  13.0 Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing
Page 13-58

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

14.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES

 

14.1 Mineral Resource

 

Table 14-1 presents the gold and silver Mineral Resource for the Camino Rojo Project. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 353.4 million tonnes at 0.832 g/t gold and 8.83 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 9.46 million ounces gold and 100.4 million ounces of silver for Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 60.9 million tonnes at 0.866 g/t gold and 7.41 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 1.70 million ounces of gold and 14.5 million ounces of silver for the inferred Mineral Resource.

 

The gold and silver Mineral Resource includes material amenable to heap leach recovery methods (leach material) and material amenable mill and flotation concentration methods (mill material). For the leach material, Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 94.6 million tonnes at 0.71 g/t gold and 12.7 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 2.16 million ounces gold and 38.8 million ounces of silver. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 4.4 million tonnes at 0.86 g/t gold and 5.8 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 119,800 ounces of gold and 805,000 ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource in leach material. The leach Mineral Resources are oxide dominant and are the focus of the Feasibility Study.

 

For the gold and silver resource in mill material, Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 258.8 million tonnes at 0.88 g/t gold and 7.4 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 7.30 million ounces gold and 61.6 million ounces of silver. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 56.6 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold and 7.5 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 1.58 million ounces of gold and 13.7 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource in mill material.

 

Table 14-2 presents the lead and zinc Mineral Resources for the Camino Rojo Project. The lead and zinc Mineral Resources are in sulphide dominant material and are recovered along with the gold and silver in the mill material. Lead and zinc Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 258.8 million tonnes at 0.07% lead and 0.26% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 413.6 million pounds of lead, and 1.50 billion pounds of zinc for Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 56.6 million tonnes at 0.05% lead and 0.23% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 63.1 million pounds of lead and 290.4 million pounds of zinc for the Inferred Mineral Resource category.

 

The Mineral Resources from the leach material are reported inclusive of those Mineral Resources that were converted to Mineral Reserves presented in Section 15.0. The Mineral Resources from the mill material were excluded from the mine design in the Feasibility Study.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The Mineral Resources are based on a block model developed by IMC during January and February 2019. This updated model incorporated the 2018 Orla drilling and updated geologic models.

 

The Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resources reported herein are contained within a floating cone pit shell to demonstrate “reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction” to meet the definition of Mineral Resources in NI 43-101.

 

Figure 14-1 shows the constraining pit shell that is based on Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource.

 

Table 14-1
Mineral Resource

    NSR Cut-off   Gold Silver Gold Silver
Resource Type ($/t) Kt (g/t) (g/t) (koz) (koz)
Leach Resource:            
  Measured Mineral Resource 4.73 19,391 0.77 14.9 482.3 9,305
  Indicated Mineral Resource 4.73 75,249 0.70 12.2 1,680.7 29,471
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 4.73 94,640 0.71 12.7 2,163.0 38,776
  Inferred Mineral Resource 4.73 4,355 0.86 5.8 119.8 805
               
Mill Resource:            
  Measured Mineral Resource 13.71 3,358 0.69 9.2 74.2 997
  Indicated Mineral Resource 13.71 255,445 0.88 7.4 7,221.4 60,606
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 13.71 258,803 0.88 7.4 7,295.6 61,603
  Inferred Mineral Resource 13.71 56,564 0.87 7.5 1,576.9 13,713
               
Total Mineral Resource            
  Measured Mineral Resource   22,749 0.76 14.1 556.5 10,302
  Indicated Mineral Resource   330,694 0.84 8.5 8,902.1 90,078
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource   353,443 0.83 8.8 9,458.6 100,379
  Inferred Mineral Resource   60,919 0.87 7.4 1,696.7 14,518
               

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 14-2
Mineral Resource – Lead and Zinc

    NSR Cut-off   Lead Zinc Lead Zinc
Resource Type ($/t) Kt (%) (%) (Mlb) (Mlb)
Mill Resource:            
  Measured Mineral Resource 13.71 3,358 0.13 0.38 9.3 28.2
  Indicated Mineral Resource 13.71 255,445 0.07 0.26 404.3 1,468.7
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 13.71 258,803 0.07 0.26 413.6 1,496.8
  Inferred Mineral Resource 13.71 56,564 0.05 0.23 63.1 290.4
               

Notes:

1. The Mineral Resources have an effective date of 7 June 2019 and the estimate was prepared using the definitions in CIM Definition Standards (10 May 2014).

2. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and therefore numbers may not appear to add precisely.

3. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

4. Mineral Resources for leach material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold and $20/oz silver.

5. Mineral Resources for mill material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold, $20/oz silver, $1.05/lb lead, and $1.20/lb zinc.

6. Mineral Resources are based on NSR cut-off of $4.73/t for leach material and $13.71/t for mill material.

7. NSR value for leach material is as follows:

Kp Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 30.77 x gold (g/t) + 0.068 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 70% and silver recovery of 11%

Ki Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 24.61 x gold (g/t) + 0.092 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 56% and silver recovery of 15%

Tran-Hi: NSR ($/t) = 26.37 x gold (g/t) + 0.166 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 60% and silver recovery of 27%

Tran-Lo: NSR ($/t) = 17.58 x gold (g/t) + 0.209 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 40% and silver recovery of 34%

8. NSR value for mill material is 36.75 x gold (g/t) + 0.429 x silver (g/t) + 10.75 x lead (%) + 11.77 x zinc (%), based on recoveries of 86% gold, 76% silver, 60% lead, and 64% zinc.

9. Table 14-3 accompanies this Mineral Resource statement and shows all relevant parameters.

10. Mineral Resources are reported in relation to a conceptual constraining pit shell in order to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction, as required by the definition of Mineral Resource in NI 43-101; mineralization lying outside of the pit shell is excluded from the Mineral Resource.

11. The Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the floating pit cone used to constrain the estimate extends onto land held by the Adjacent Owner. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner.

12. The Mineral Resources in the leach material are inclusive of those Mineral Resources that were converted to Mineral Reserves.

 

14.1.1 Metal Prices for Mineral Resources

 

Table 14-3 shows the economic and recovery parameters for the Mineral Resource estimate. Metal prices for the Mineral Resource estimate are US$1400 per ounce gold, US$20 per ounce silver, US$1.05 per pound lead, and US$1.20 per pound zinc. IMC believes these prices to be reasonable based on: 1) historical 3-year trailing averages, 2) prices used by other companies for comparable projects, and 3) long range consensus price forecasts prepared by various bank economists.

 

14.1.2 Cost and Recovery Estimates for Mineral Resources

 

The mining cost is estimated at US$1.65 per total tonne. This was estimated by IMC and is based on owner operation of the mining fleet. This includes an allowance of US$0.05 per tonne for pit dewatering.

 

Table 14-3 shows parameters for six material types. Note that costs used for the resource estimation vary somewhat from the costs estimated in the Feasibility Study because the resource was done earlier and the Feasibility Study does not consider the sulphide material. The costs used in the Mineral Resource estimation were only used to demonstrate “reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction”. For the first four materials, Kp Oxide, Ki Oxide, Transitional High Oxide, and Transitional Low Oxide, it is assumed that processing will be by crushing and heap leaching. The processing and G&A costs of US$3.413 and US$1.319 per processed tonne respectively were provided by KCA and are based on a process production rate of 18,000 tonnes per day or about 6.57 million tonnes per year.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

KCA provided the recovery estimates for gold and silver shown in Table 14-3. These estimates consider both the historical and recent metallurgical testing data.

 

IMC assumed 100% refinery payables for this case. The gold and silver refining costs are also IMC estimates. The leach material is also subject to a 2% NSR royalty. Lead and zinc do not contribute to economics for leach material.

 

Due to two products, and also variable recoveries by material type, an NSR value was calculated for each block to tabulate proposed quantities of mineralized material. The gold and silver NSR factors for Kp Oxide are calculated as follows:

 

Gold NSR Factor = ($1400 – $5.00) x 0.70 x 1.00 x 0.98 / 31.103 = $30.768/t

 

Silver NSR Factor = ($20 – $0.50) x 0.11 x 1.00 x 0.98 / 31.103 = $0.0676/t

 

The units are US$ per gram per tonne. The 0.98 constant represents an allowance for the royalty cost.

 

The NSR value for a block is calculated as:

 

NSR = $30.768 x gold grade + $0.0676 x silver grade

 

The breakeven NSR cut-off is US$6.38 per tonne, the mining + process + G&A cost. The internal NSR cut-off is US$4.73 per tonne, the process + G&A cost. Internal cut-off applies to blocks that have to be removed from the pit, so mining is a sunk cost. Note the NSR cut-off does not vary by material type for the heap leach materials, so is convenient for mine planning and scheduling.

 

The parameters and cut-offs for the other material types are also shown in Table 14-3.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-4

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 14-3
Economic Parameters for Mineral Resource Estimate

Material Type Units Kp Oxide Ki Oxide Tran-Hi Tran-Low Tran-S Sulphide Waste
Commodity Prices                  
  Gold Price Per Ounce   (US$) 1400 1400 1400 1400 1400 1400  
  Silver Price Per Ounce   (US$) 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00  
  Lead Price Per Pound   (US$) 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05  
  Zinc Price Per Pound   (US$) 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20  
Plant Production Rate   (ktpy) 6,570 6,570 6,570 6,570 9,125 9,125  
Mining Cost Per Tonne                  
  Owner Mining Cost   (US$) 1.600 1.600 1.600 1.600 1.600 1.600 1.600
  Allowance for Pit Dewatering (US$) 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050
  Total Mining Cost   (US$) 1.650 1.650 1.650 1.650 1.650 1.650 1.650
Process and G&A Cost Per Ore Tonne                
  Processing     (US$) 3.413 3.413 3.413 3.413 12.500 12.500  
  G&A     (US$) 1.319 1.319 1.319 1.319 1.205 1.205  
  Total Process and G&A   (US$) 4.732 4.732 4.732 4.732 13.705 13.705  
Plant Recovery                  
  Gold     (%) 70% 56% 60% 40% 86% 86%  
  Silver     (%) 11% 15% 27% 34% 76% 76%  
  Lead       (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 60% 60%  
  Zinc       (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 64% 64%  
Smelting/Refining Payables and Costs                
  Gold Refinery Payable   (%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 95%  
  Silver Refinery Payable   (%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 95%  
  Lead Smelter Payable   (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 95% 95%  
  Zinc Smelter Payable   (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 85% 85%  
  Gold Refining Per Ounce (US$) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00  
  Silver Refining Per Ounce (US$) 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.50 1.50  
  Lead Treatment Per Pound (US$) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.194 0.194  
  Zinc Treatment Per Pound (US$) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.219 0.219  
Royalties                    
  Royalty     (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0%  
NSR Factors                    
  Gold NSR Factor   ($/g) 30.768 24.614 26.372 17.582 36.748 36.748  
  Silver NSR Factor   ($/g) 0.0676 0.0922 0.1659 0.2089 0.4294 0.4294  
  Lead NSR Factor   ($/%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.753 10.753  
  Zinc NSR Factor   ($/%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.770 11.770  
NSR Cut-offs                  
  Breakeven NSR Cut-off ($/t) 6.38 6.38 6.38 6.38 15.36 15.36  
  Internal NSR Cut-off ($/t) 4.73 4.73 4.73 4.73 13.71 13.71  

Note: Economic parameters used for the Mineral Resource vary slightly from the Feasibility Study economic model as they were done before the final economic analysis.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

14.1.3 Parameters for Mill Material

 

The processing cost for the Transition Sulphide and Sulphide material types is estimated at US$12.50 per tonne based on grinding and differential flotation to produce a lead, zinc, and a pyrite concentrate. The plant production rate is assumed to be 25,000 tpd or 9.12 million tonnes per year. The overall recoveries for gold and silver are based on the oxidation and cyanide leaching of the pyrite concentrate. The cost for this is included in the process cost estimate. It is assumed the lead and zinc will be recovered as concentrates that will be shipped to conventional smelters. Preliminary estimates of plant recoveries for gold, silver, lead, and zinc are shown in Table 14-3.

 

Table 14-4 shows typical treatment terms for lead and zinc concentrates, and is the basis for the payable amounts of lead and zinc and treatment charges shown in Table 14-3. Typical concentrate grades are assumed for the calculation but more testing is required.

 

The NSR factors for each metal are shown in Table 14-3 and are calculated as follows:

 

Gold NSR Factor = ($1400 – $1.00) x 0.86 x 0.95 / 31.103 = $36.748/t

 

Silver NSR Factor = ($20 – $1.50) x 0.76 x 0.95 / 31.103 = $0.4294/t

 

Lead NSR Factor = ($1.05 - $0.194) x 0.60 x 0.95 x 22.046 = $10.753/t

 

Zinc NSR Factor = ($1.20 - $0.219) x 0.64 x 0.85 x 22.046 = $11.770/t

 

Table 14-4
Treatment Costs for Lead and Zinc Concentrates

Parameter   Units Lead Zinc
Concentrate Grade   (%) 60% 53%
Moisture Content   (%) 8.5% 8.5%
Concentrate Loss   (%) 0.0% 0.0%
Payable Percentage   (%) 95% 85%
Payable Lbs/Tonne   (lbs) 1,257 993
Treatment Cost Per DMT (US$) 217.00 190.00
Freight Per WMT   (US$) 25.00 25.00
Treatment Cost Per Pound (US$) 0.173 0.191
Transport Cost Per Pound (US$) 0.022 0.027
Total Cost Per Pound (US$) 0.194 0.219

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Total NSR is calculated by multiplying each factor times the mineral grade; the lead and zinc grades are assumed to be in percent (ppm/10000). The breakeven NSR cut-off is US$15.36 per tonne; internal NSR cut-off is US$13.71 per tonne. The Mineral Resources on Table 14-1 and Table 14-2 are based on internal NSR cut-off for all material types. There are no royalties applied to the mill material.

 

14.1.4 Additional Information

 

The Mineral Resources are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) “CIM Definition Standards – For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” adopted by the CIM Council (as amended, the “CIM Definition Standards”) in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101. Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates reflect the reasonable expectation that all necessary permits and approvals will be obtained and maintained.

 

There is no guarantee that any of the Mineral Resources will be converted to Mineral Reserve. The Inferred Mineral Resources included in this Technical Report meet the current definition of Inferred Mineral Resources. The quantity and grade of Inferred Mineral Resources are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these inferred Mineral Resources as an Indicated Mineral Resource. It is, however, expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resource could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resource with continued exploration.

 

IMC does not believe that there are significant risks to the Mineral Resource estimates based on environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, or political factors. The Project is in a jurisdiction friendly to mining. The most significant risks to the Mineral Resource are related to economic parameters such as prices lower than forecast, recoveries lower than forecast, or costs higher than the current estimates.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Mineral Resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by the Adjacent Owner and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the Mineral Resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner. The Mineral Resource estimate has been prepared based on the Qualified Person’s reasoned judgment, in accordance with CIM Best Practices Guidelines and his professional standards of competence, that there is a reasonable expectation that all necessary permits, agreements and approvals will be obtained and maintained, including an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to allow mining of waste material on its mineral concessions. In particular, in considering the prospects for eventual economic extraction, consideration was given to industry practice, including the past practices of the Adjacent Owner in entering similar agreements on commercially reasonable terms, and a timeframe of 10-15 years.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement would affect the development of a significant portion of the Mineral Resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. There can be no assurance that Orla will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to Orla or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14-1 Mineral Resource Constraining Cone Shell, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

14.2 Description of the Block Model

 

14.2.1 General

 

The Camino Rojo Mineral Resource is based on a block model developed by IMC during January and February 2019. The model is based on 10m by 10m by 10m high blocks. The model is not rotated. The main changes since the April 2018 model are:

 

· The Orla 2018 drilling data is incorporated into the model.
· The alteration and oxidation geological models have been updated.
· Portions of Canplats wet RC drilling has been designated as potentially contaminated and excluded from the model.

 

14.2.2 Geological Controls

 

Orla personnel developed various geological models as follows:

 

· A solid to define the post mineral lithologic unit and a surface to represent the contact between the Caracol and Indidura units.
· Solids to represent higher and lower amounts of potassium alteration in the Caracol and Indidura units; these were termed Potassium Pervasive (Kp) and Potassium Incipient (Ki) alteration zones.
· Solids to represent several levels of oxidation.
· A solid interpretation of a dike that runs through the deposit from southwest to northeast.

 

IMC reviewed these solids and incorporated them in the model. The lithology model, variable “lith”, is defined as follows:

 

Table 14-5
Camino Rojo Model Rock Types (lith)

Rock Code Unit Description
10 PM Post Mineral
20 Car Caracol
30 Ind Indidura

 

The lithology code was assigned to the nearest whole block, i.e. the block was assigned if more than 50% of the block was inside the solid. Figure 14-2 shows the drillhole locations and the location of cross sections referenced in this section. Figure 14-3 shows the lithology on Section L112 along the long axis of the deposit (southwest to northeast). The Caracol unit is the main resource host.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-10

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14-2

Hole and Cross Section Locations, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14-3 Lithology on Section L112, IMC 2019

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-12

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The main control for grade estimation is based on the level of potassium alteration and is based on geological logging and ICP assays of potassium. The alteration model, variable “alt”, is defined as follows:

 

Table 14-6
Camino Rojo Alteration Types (alt)

Alteration Code Alteration Description
10 Kp Potassium Pervasive – Caracol
20 Ki Potassium Incipient – Caracol/Indidura
30 Ind Potassium Pervasive - Indidura

 

The Kp (Potassium Pervasive) alteration tends to be pervasive potassium flooding and potassium content in ICP results are consistently above 3% throughout the zone. It is efficient in defining the area of higher gold assays. The Ki (Potassium Incipient) alteration has potassium flooding localized in bands associated with structures and potassium in ICP results are variable, with the altered portions having greater than 3% and the unaltered <1 to 3% potassium. Figure 14-4 through Figure 14-6 are sections of the alteration. Figure 14-4 is long Section L112. Figure 14-5 and Figure 14-6 are in the southwest and northeast portions of the deposit respectively.

 

The oxide model, variable “oxide” is defined as follows:

 

Table 14-7
Camino Rojo Oxide-Sulphide Model (oxide)

Oxide Code Type Description
10 Ox Oxide
20 TrH Transition 60-90% Oxide
30 TrL Transition 30-60% Oxide
40 TrS Transition 10-30% Oxide
50 Slf Sulphide

 

The solids were developed based on % oxide in the drillhole database as logged by Goldcorp. Orla geologists logged holes on several sections to verify the Goldcorp loggings. Figure 14-7 shows a cross section of the oxide model in the northeast portion of the deposit. The southwest portion of the deposit is mostly sulphide.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-13

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

In addition to the above geologic controls, IMC also included a domain code in the model. This was due to perceived differences in the orientation of the mineralization in the higher elevation northeast portion of the Caracol versus the deeper southwest portion. These are described in Table 14-8. Figure 14-8 shows a long section of the domains.

 

Table 14- 8
Camino Rojo Estimation Domains (domain)

Domain Code Domain Description
10 NEKp Kp in the NE
15 NEKi Ki in the NE
20 SWKp Kp in the SW
25 SWKi Ki in the SW
30 INKp Kp in Indidura
35 INKi Ki in Indidura

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-14

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14-4 Alteration on Section L112, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-15

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14-5 Alteration on Section 18, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-16

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14-6 Alteration on Section 29, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-17

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14- 7 Oxidation Zones on Section 29, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-18

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14- 8 Estimation Domains on Section L112, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-19

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

14.2.3 Potentially Contaminated RC Samples

 

As discussed in Section 12.0, IMC conducted a review of the Canplats RC drilling results, particularly portions of the holes that were deemed wet. Based on the analysis IMC determined that the assay intervals marked as wet or humid for the following 16 holes are potentially contaminated and they were not used for resource modeling:

 

BCR-031 BCR-039 BCR-040 BCR-052
BCR-069 BCR-080 BCR-010 BCR-028
BCR-030 BCR-032 BCR-035 BCR-044
BCR-057 BCR-074 BCR-084 BCR-085

 

14.2.4 Cap Grades and Compositing

 

IMC reviewed the distribution of assays for gold, silver, lead, and zinc, by six different populations and applied cap grades as shown in Figure 14-9. The top part of the table shows the cap grades and the bottom shows the number of assays capped. The cap grades were generally derived by reviewing probability plots and sorted lists of the assays to find breaks in the distributions. The cap grades are at the 99.8 percentile of the distributions for gold and silver and at the 99.9 percentile for lead and zinc; they would not generally be considered very aggressive capping.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-20

 

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 14-9


Cap Grades and Number of Assays Capped

 

    Northeast Southwest Indidura
Metal Units Kp Ki Kp Ki Kp Ki
               
Gold (g/t) 11 5.4 27 6.8 18.5 15
               
Silver (g/t) 108 79 145 263 103 73
               
Lead (%) 1.9 1.4 2.7 2.2 1.0 0.75
               
Zinc (%) 3.1 2.4 4.7 3.2 5.2 7.5
               
Number of Assays Capped          
    Northeast Southwest Indidura
Metal Units Kp Ki Kp Ki Kp Ki
               
Gold (none) 27 18 59 63 4 18
               
Silver (none) 28 18 61 62 4 18
               
Lead (none) 17 10 31 33 2 9
               
Zinc (none) 15 10 31 29 2 9
               

 

Figure 14-9 and Figure 14-10 show probability plots of gold assays and gold composites respectively for the NE domain. The plots show original and capped values for the Kp and Ki alterations types. Figure 14-11 and Figure 14-12 show the probability plots for gold for the SW domain and Figure 14-13 and Figure 14-14 are for Indidura.

 

The lithology and alteration codes were assigned to the drillhole database by back-assignment from the solids. The domain codes were assigned to the database by back-assignment from the model.

 

The drillhole database was composited to regular 5m downhole composites, though the current model is based on 10m blocks. This was to avoid blurring the rock type and alteration contacts. Table 14-10 and Table 14-11 show basic descriptive statistics for the assays and 5m composites respectively. Results are shown for gold, silver, lead, and zinc and are by the various estimation domain populations. The left side of the table shows results for uncapped values and the right side shows capped values.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-21

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 14-10

 

Summary Statistics of Assays

 

    Not Capped         Capped    
  No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min
Metal/Domain Samples (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) Samples (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t)
Gold: 92,564 0.56 2.18 290.0 0.002 92,564 0.54 1.51 27.0 0.002
Northeast Domain: 21,784 0.57 1.12 51.3 0.002 21,784 0.56 0.91 11.0 0.002
Kp Alteration 12,934 0.79 1.31 51.3 0.002 12,934 0.77 1.05 11.0 0.002
Ki Alteration 8,850 0.25 0.61 22.3 0.002 8,850 0.24 0.50 5.4 0.002
Southwest Domain: 60,483 0.58 2.50 290.0 0.002 60,483 0.55 1.71 27.0 0.002
Kp Alteration 29,691 1.01 3.42 290.0 0.002 29,691 0.96 2.30 27.0 0.002
Ki Alteration 30,792 0.17 0.81 48.0 0.002 30,792 0.16 0.56 6.8 0.002
All Caracol 82,267 0.58 2.22 290.0 0.002 82,267 0.56 1.54 27.0 0.002
Kp Alteration 42,625 0.94 2.95 290.0 0.002 42,625 0.90 2.01 27.0 0.002
Ki Alteration 39,642 0.19 0.77 48.0 0.002 39,642 0.18 0.54 6.8 0.002
Indidura 10,297 0.42 1.81 63.8 0.002 10,297 0.38 1.20 18.5 0.002
Kp Alteration 1,652 0.80 1.81 27.1 0.002 1,652 0.79 1.68 18.5 0.002
Ki Alteration 8,645 0.34 1.80 63.8 0.002 8,645 0.31 1.07 15.0 0.002
  No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min
Metal/Domain Samples (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) Samples (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t)
Silver: 92,564 6.8 24.8 4870 0.14 92,564 6.5 14.6 263 0.14
Northeast Domain: 21,784 11.7 35.9 4870 0.25 21,784 11.3 12.7 108 0.25
Kp Alteration 12,934 15.5 45.5 4870 0.25 12,934 15.0 13.9 108 0.25
Ki Alteration 8,850 6.0 9.2 338 0.25 8,850 5.9 8.1 79 0.25
Southwest Domain: 60,483 5.6 21.2 1310 0.14 60,483 5.4 15.7 263 0.14
Kp Alteration 29,691 6.8 15.9 804 0.25 29,691 6.7 13.2 145 0.25
Ki Alteration 30,792 4.4 25.2 1310 0.14 30,792 4.1 17.8 263 0.14
All Caracol 82,267 7.2 26.0 4870 0.14 82,267 6.9 15.2 263 0.14
Kp Alteration 42,625 9.5 28.6 4870 0.25 42,625 9.2 14.0 145 0.25
Ki Alteration 39,642 4.8 22.6 1310 0.14 39,642 4.5 16.1 263 0.14
Indidura 10,297 3.3 10.5 421 0.25 10,297 3.2 7.9 103 0.25
Kp Alteration 1,652 6.4 15.4 421 0.25 1,652 6.2 11.5 103 0.25
Ki Alteration 8,645 2.8 9.1 290 0.25 8,645 2.6 6.8 73 0.25
  No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min
Metal/Domain Samples (%) (%) (%) (%) Samples (%) (%) (%) (%)
Lead: 92,564 0.080 0.213 12.85 0.00 92,564 0.079 0.186 2.70 0.00
Northeast Domain: 21,784 0.195 0.237 8.85 0.00 21,784 0.194 0.226 1.90 0.00
Kp Alteration 12,934 0.265 0.245 3.53 0.00 12,934 0.264 0.242 1.90 0.00
Ki Alteration 8,850 0.092 0.180 8.85 0.00 8,850 0.091 0.149 1.40 0.00
Southwest Domain: 60,483 0.051 0.206 12.85 0.00 60,483 0.049 0.167 2.70 0.00
Kp Alteration 29,691 0.069 0.234 12.85 0.00 29,691 0.067 0.189 2.70 0.00
Ki Alteration 30,792 0.034 0.173 7.90 0.00 30,792 0.032 0.139 2.20 0.00
All Caracol 82,267 0.089 0.224 12.85 0.00 82,267 0.087 0.195 2.70 0.00
Kp Alteration 42,625 0.128 0.254 12.85 0.00 42,625 0.127 0.226 2.70 0.00
Ki Alteration 39,642 0.047 0.176 8.85 0.00 39,642 0.045 0.144 2.20 0.00
Indidura 10,297 0.011 0.061 2.69 0.00 10,297 0.010 0.046 1.00 0.00
Kp Alteration 1,652 0.022 0.091 2.69 0.00 1,652 0.021 0.066 1.00 0.00
Ki Alteration 8,645 0.008 0.054 2.09 0.00 8,645 0.008 0.040 0.75 0.00
  No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min
Metal/Domain Samples (%) (%) (%) (%) Samples (%) (%) (%) (%)
Zinc: 92,562 0.204 0.400 13.00 0.00 92,562 0.202 0.384 7.50 0.00
Northeast Domain: 21,784 0.330 0.319 5.44 0.00 21,784 0.329 0.312 3.10 0.00
Kp Alteration 12,934 0.431 0.341 4.41 0.00 12,934 0.431 0.337 3.10 0.00
Ki Alteration 8,850 0.181 0.209 5.44 0.00 8,850 0.180 0.191 2.40 0.00
Southwest Domain: 60,482 0.161 0.372 13.00 0.00 60,482 0.160 0.353 4.70 0.00
Kp Alteration 29,690 0.254 0.453 13.00 0.00 29,690 0.253 0.432 4.70 0.00
Ki Alteration 30,792 0.071 0.239 7.81 0.00 30,792 0.070 0.219 3.20 0.00
All Caracol 82,266 0.206 0.366 13.00 0.00 82,266 0.205 0.351 4.70 0.00
Kp Alteration 42,624 0.308 0.430 13.00 0.00 42,624 0.307 0.414 4.70 0.00
Ki Alteration 39,642 0.095 0.237 7.81 0.00 39,642 0.094 0.218 3.20 0.00
Indidura 10,296 0.187 0.607 13.00 0.00 10,296 0.185 0.586 7.50 0.00
Kp Alteration 1,652 0.291 0.567 6.21 0.00 1,652 0.290 0.559 5.20 0.00
Ki Alteration 8,644 0.167 0.612 13.00 0.00 8,644 0.165 0.589 7.50 0.00

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-22

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 14-11

 

Summary Statistics of 5m Composites

 

    Not Capped         Capped    
  No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min
Metal/Domain Samples (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) Samples (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t)
Gold: 28,761 0.56 1.37 89.1 0.002 28,761 0.54 1.02 24.2 0.002
Northeast Domain: 7,142 0.57 0.81 22.3 0.002 7,142 0.56 0.69 8.0 0.002
Kp Alteration 4,282 0.79 0.93 22.3 0.002 4,282 0.77 0.77 8.0 0.002
Ki Alteration 2,860 0.26 0.42 7.0 0.002 2,860 0.25 0.38 4.0 0.002
Southwest Domain: 18,524 0.58 1.57 89.1 0.002 18,524 0.55 1.15 24.2 0.002
Kp Alteration 9,138 1.00 2.09 89.1 0.002 9,138 0.95 1.49 24.2 0.002
Ki Alteration 9,386 0.17 0.53 19.7 0.002 9,386 0.16 0.38 6.0 0.002
All Caracol 25,666 0.58 1.40 89.1 0.002 25,666 0.55 1.04 24.2 0.002
Kp Alteration 13,420 0.93 1.80 89.1 0.002 13,420 0.89 1.31 24.2 0.002
Ki Alteration 12,246 0.19 0.51 19.7 0.002 12,246 0.18 0.38 6.0 0.002
Indidura 3,095 0.42 1.09 21.6 0.002 3,095 0.39 0.77 7.9 0.002
Kp Alteration 500 0.80 1.11 9.7 0.004 500 0.79 1.04 7.9 0.004
Ki Alteration 2,595 0.35 1.07 21.6 0.002 2,595 0.31 0.68 7.8 0.002
  No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min
Metal/Domain Samples (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) Samples (g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t)
Silver: 28,761 6.9 17.2 1961 0.25 28,761 6.6 10.4 211 0.25
Northeast Domain: 7,142 11.8 25.5 1961 0.25 7,142 11.4 10.2 89 0.25
Kp Alteration 4,282 15.6 31.9 1961 0.25 4,282 15.0 10.8 89 0.25
Ki Alteration 2,860 6.1 6.5 115 0.25 2,860 6.0 6.1 58 0.25
Southwest Domain: 18,524 5.6 13.7 531 0.25 18,524 5.3 10.5 211 0.25
Kp Alteration 9,138 6.8 10.4 252 0.25 9,138 6.7 9.0 128 0.25
Ki Alteration 9,386 4.4 16.3 531 0.25 9,386 4.1 11.7 211 0.25
All Caracol 25,666 7.3 18.0 1961 0.25 25,666 7.0 10.8 211 0.25
Kp Alteration 13,420 9.6 20.4 1961 0.25 13,420 9.3 10.4 128 0.25
Ki Alteration 12,246 4.8 14.6 531 0.25 12,246 4.5 10.7 211 0.25
Indidura 3,095 3.4 7.3 181 0.25 3,095 3.2 5.6 85 0.25
Kp Alteration 500 6.4 10.3 140 0.25 500 6.2 8.3 85 0.25
Ki Alteration 2,595 2.8 6.4 181 0.25 2,595 2.7 4.8 59 0.25
  No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min
Metal/Domain Samples (%) (%) (%) (%) Samples (%) (%) (%) (%)
Lead: 28,761 0.083 0.159 4.61 0.00 28,761 0.081 0.147 1.92 0.00
Northeast Domain: 7,142 0.196 0.193 2.99 0.00 7,142 0.195 0.189 1.43 0.00
Kp Alteration 4,282 0.263 0.201 1.56 0.00 4,282 0.263 0.199 1.43 0.00
Ki Alteration 2,860 0.094 0.126 2.99 0.00 2,860 0.093 0.112 0.93 0.00
Southwest Domain: 18,524 0.051 0.133 4.61 0.00 18,524 0.049 0.112 1.92 0.00
Kp Alteration 9,138 0.069 0.151 4.61 0.00 9,138 0.067 0.129 1.92 0.00
Ki Alteration 9,386 0.034 0.110 3.62 0.00 9,386 0.032 0.090 1.46 0.00
All Caracol 25,666 0.091 0.166 4.61 0.00 25,666 0.090 0.153 1.92 0.00
Kp Alteration 13,420 0.131 0.192 4.61 0.00 13,420 0.129 0.180 1.92 0.00
Ki Alteration 12,246 0.048 0.117 3.62 0.00 12,246 0.046 0.099 1.46 0.00
Indidura 3,095 0.011 0.041 1.01 0.00 3,095 0.010 0.032 0.63 0.00
Kp Alteration 500 0.023 0.068 1.01 0.00 500 0.021 0.050 0.51 0.00
Ki Alteration 2,595 0.008 0.033 0.77 0.00 2,595 0.008 0.026 0.63 0.00
  No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min No. of Mean Std Dev Max Min
Metal/Domain Samples (%) (%) (%) (%) Samples (%) (%) (%) (%)
Zinc: 28,761 0.207 0.289 5.58 0.00 28,761 0.206 0.281 5.24 0.00
Northeast Domain: 7,142 0.332 0.267 3.23 0.01 7,142 0.331 0.263 2.96 0.01
Kp Alteration 4,282 0.432 0.277 3.23 0.01 4,282 0.431 0.275 2.96 0.01
Ki Alteration 2,860 0.183 0.161 2.95 0.01 2,860 0.182 0.149 1.48 0.01
Southwest Domain: 18,524 0.161 0.258 3.96 0.00 18,524 0.160 0.249 3.25 0.00
Kp Alteration 9,138 0.254 0.305 3.96 0.00 9,138 0.253 0.296 3.25 0.00
Ki Alteration 9,386 0.071 0.155 2.55 0.00 9,386 0.070 0.144 2.14 0.00
All Caracol 25,666 0.209 0.271 3.96 0.00 25,666 0.208 0.264 3.25 0.00
Kp Alteration 13,420 0.311 0.308 3.96 0.00 13,420 0.310 0.301 3.25 0.00
Ki Alteration 12,246 0.097 0.163 2.95 0.00 12,246 0.096 0.153 2.14 0.00
Indidura 3,095 0.188 0.404 5.58 0.00 3,095 0.186 0.389 5.24 0.00
Kp Alteration 500 0.291 0.369 3.62 0.00 500 0.290 0.362 3.20 0.00
Ki Alteration 2,595 0.168 0.407 5.58 0.00 2,595 0.166 0.391 5.24 0.00

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-23

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 14-9 Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – NE Domain

 

 

 

Figure 14-10 Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – NE Domain

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-24

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 14-11 Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – SW Domain

 

 

Figure 14-12 Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – SW Domain

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-25

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 14-13 Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – Indidura

 

 

Figure 14-14 Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – Indidura

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-26

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

14.2.5 Variograms

 

14.2.5.1 Northeast Domain

 

IMC conducted a variogram analysis of gold in the Kp alteration type for the NE domain. The analysis was based on the 5m composites. Figure 14-15 shows the variogram in the N60°E direction with no dip. This is a good variogram in terms of clarity and has a range of about 135m. This direction is assumed as the major axis for the variogram model. Figure 14-16 shows the variogram in the S30°E direction with a dip of 15°. This is also a good variogram in terms of clarity with ranges of 85 and 160m for the two structures fit to it. It is noted that the primary and secondary directions conform to the strike and dip of the bedding.

 

Figure 14-17 shows the variogram in the north direction with a 60° dip. This is approximately, but not exactly, the tertiary direction to the previous variograms. This direction represents the approximate downhole direction for much of the drilling, so is a convenient direction for calculation. The variogram is of good clarity, but relatively short range. The range of the first structure fit to the variogram is about 32m and about 90% of the total variability in this variogram takes place within about this distance.

 

14.2.5.2 Southwest Domain

 

Figure 14-18 shows the variogram in the S60°W direction with a 25° dip for the SW domain. This is assumed to be the primary axis, and it appears evident on cross sections. The variogram has good clarity with a range of about 100m.

 

Figure 14-19 shows the variogram in the north direction with a 60° dip. As previously mentioned, this is the approximate downhole direction for much of the drilling. Orla geological personnel propose that a primary control of mineralization is related to structures trending about N60°E with a steep NNW dip. This variogram is approximately in that direction. It can be seen however that the range of the variogram is quite short, about 8m for the first structure and 31m for the second structure. However, IMC could not find any direction perpendicular to the major axis that produced good variogram results. Based on this, it was determined to assume the secondary and tertiary directions were the same, and about half the range of the primary direction.

 

IMC did not run variograms for Indidura; there is not sufficient drilling. Indidura grade estimations are the same as for the SW domain. IMC also did not run variograms for the lower grade Ki alteration zones. The Ki searches are assumed to be the same as for Kp alteration.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-27

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 14-15 NE Domain Gold Variogram – Primary Axis

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-28

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 14-16 NE Domain Gold Variogram – Secondary Axis

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-29

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 14-17 NE Domain Gold Variogram – Tertiary Axis

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-30

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 14-18 SW Domain Gold Variogram – Primary Axis

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-31

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 14-19 SW Domain Gold Variogram – Down Hole Variogram

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates
June, 2019
  14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate
Page 14-32

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

14.2.6 Block Grade Estimation

 

The Kp versus Ki alteration types were treated as a hard boundary for estimation purposes. Kp blocks were only estimated with Kp composites, etc. The Indidura/Caracol boundary was also a hard boundary. As was depicted on Table 14-7 there are six domains for grade estimation for gold, silver, lead, and zinc:

 

· Kp in the NE domain
· Ki in the NE domain
· Kp in the SW domain
· Ki in the SW domain
· Kp in Indidura, and
  · Ki in Indidura

 

The NE and SW domains were not a hard boundary for estimation, but were used to control search orientation. For the NE Caracol (Kp and Ki), the primary axis of the search ellipse had a dip direction and dip of 60° (N60°E) and 0° respectively and the secondary axis had a dip direction and dip of 150° (S30°E) and 15° (down) respectively. The search radii were 100m along the primary and secondary directions and 30m in the tertiary direction.

 

IMC estimated grades for gold, silver, lead, and zinc using inverse distance with a power weight of 2 (ID2). A maximum of 15 composites, a minimum of three and a maximum of three composites per hole was used. The effect of inverse distance weighting along with a relatively low number of composites should produce relatively unsmoothed estimates of block grades. Also recall that 5m composites were used to estimate the grades of the 10m blocks. Figure 14-20 shows a cross section of the gold grades in the NE domain.

 

For the SW Caracol (again Kp and Ki), and also the Indidura domains, the primary axis of the search ellipse had a dip direction and dip of 240° (S60°W) and 25° (down). The search radii were 100m along the major axis and 50m, circular, perpendicular to the primary axis.

 

A maximum of 24 composites, a minimum of four and a maximum of eight composites per hole was used. This is more composites, and more per hole, than was used for the NE domain, but is necessary since there is not as much clarity on the secondary versus tertiary direction in the SW domain. Figure 14-21 shows a cross section of gold grades in the SW domain. Figure 14-22 shows the gold grades on the long section.

 

Arsenic grades were also estimated and incorporated into the resource model. The estimate was done using the same domains and parameters as gold, silver, lead, and zinc. The estimate was based on the multi-element data in the database. The upper detection limit for the arsenic assays was 10,000 ppm.

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-33

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Sulphur grades were also estimated and incorporated into the model. For sulphur, the oxidation types, oxide, transition high, transition low, transition sulphide, and sulphide, were used as hard boundaries for estimation. The Kp and Ki boundaries were also hard boundaries; there tended to be significant breaks in the sulphur grades across these boundaries. The sulphur estimates were also based on multi-element data in the database. The upper detection limit for sulphur was 10%.

 

Grade estimates for lead, zinc, arsenic and sulphur were also estimated into the waste zones outside of the established resource domains for waste characterization purposes. This also included the post mineral rock type. These estimates were also by Inverse Distance Squared (ID2) with a 100m by 100m by 30m vertical flat search.

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-34

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 14-20 Gold Grades on Section 29, IMC 2019

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-35

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 14-21 Gold Grades on Section 18, IMC 2019

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-36

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

  

Figure 14-22 Gold Grades on Section L112, IMC 2019

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-37

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

14.2.7 Resource Classification

 

For the purpose of classifying the Mineral Resources, two additional block estimates were done. They were based on the same search orientations and search radii as the grade estimates. The first estimate was based on a maximum of four composites, a minimum of four, and a maximum of one composite per hole. The second estimate was based on a maximum of three composites, a minimum of three, and a maximum of one composite per hole. These estimates provide the average distance to the nearest three and four holes to each block and were put into the block model. Note the grade from this estimate was not used. Also, the Kp/Ki contact was not used as a hard boundary for these estimations.

 

Blocks with an average distance to four holes less than or equal to 25m were assigned as Measured Mineral Resource. Blocks with an average distance to the nearest three holes less than 45m, but greater than 25m from the nearest four holes, were assigned as Indicated Mineral Resource. Blocks with an average distance to three holes greater than 45m were assigned to Inferred Mineral Resource. The distribution of drilling at Camino Rojo is quite variable. Generally (not specific to Camino Rojo) an average distance to the nearest four holes of 25m corresponds to an average drill spacing of 30m to 33m. An average distance to the nearest three holes of 45m corresponds to an average drill spacing of about 60m. These estimates are approximate.

 

After setting classification codes as discussed above, there was some minor reclassification between the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource categories to do some smoothing and orphan removal using the following procedure:

 

· First, Indicated blocks with edge contacts with two or more Measured blocks were reclassified as Measured. This is a minor smoothing operation that removed some orphan Indicated blocks and, in some cases, joined up some separate pods of Measured blocks.
· Second, Measured blocks with 0 or 1 edge with other Measured blocks were reclassified as indicated.
· Third, all Measured blocks on the 1640 bench and below were reclassified as Indicated blocks. At depth the Measured blocks are formed into fairly small pods of mostly transition sulphide or sulphide material. It is preferred to not classify this as Measured Mineral Resource.

  

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-38

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Figure 14-23, Figure 14-24 and Figure 14-25 show the probability plots for these average distances for the NE, SW, and Indidura domains respectively. The approximate percent of blocks in each resource category are:

 

  Measured Indicated Inferred
       
Northeast 11.9% 74.9% 13.2%
       
Southwest 1.9% 60.2% 37.9%
       
Indidura 0.8% 34.7% 64.5%

 

 

Figure 14-26 and Figure 14-27 show the resource categories on cross sections.

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-39

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14-23 Average Distance to Nearest 3 & 4 Holes – NE Kp & Ki Domains

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-40

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14-24 Average Distance to Nearest 3 & 4 Holes – SW Kp & Ki Domains

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-41

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14-25 Average Distance to Nearest 3 & 4 Holes – Indidura Kp & Ki Domains

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-42

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14-26 Resource Categories on Section 18, IMC 2019

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-43

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 14-27 Resource Categories on Section 29, IMC 2019

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-44

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

14.2.8 Bulk Density

 

The database included about 10,000 specific gravity and density tests conducted on core. Some were based on the wax immersion method, but most were based on cutting whole core to obtain small cylinders and measuring them to obtain the volume; they were then weighed.

 

IMC examined this data by rock type and oxidation type. Table 14-12 shows the results.

 

Table 14-12
Specific Gravity and Bulk Density

 

    No. of Specific Bulk Bulk Ktonnes/
Lithology Oxidation Samples Gravity Factor Density Block
             
Post Min Ox 183 1.994 0.98 1.954 1.954
             
Caracol Ox, TrH 703 2.458 0.98 2.409 2.409
             
Caracol TrL, TrS 778 2.550 0.98 2.499 2.499
             
Caracol Slf 6450 2.618 0.98 2.566 2.566
             
Indura TrS, Slf 1915 2.664 0.98 2.611 2.611
             

 

 

The post mineral rock types averaged about 2.0. For the Caracol unit there were measurable differences based on the level of oxidation. The oxide and TrH material averaged about 2.46, The TrL and TrS material about 2.55, and the sulphide about 2.62. The Indidura unit averaged about 2.66.

 

The average specific gravity was reduced 2% to obtain an estimate of bulk density. This is to allow for voids in the rock mass at a larger scale than what could be captured in the small core samples.

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-45

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

14.2.9 Mineral Resource Reconciliation

 

14.2.9.1 Leach Material

 

A reconciliation of the current Mineral Resource, dated June 7, 2019, with the April 27, 2018 Mineral Resource, developed for the PEA study, was conducted. The Mineral Resource includes material amenable to heap leach recovery methods (leach material) and material amenable to mill and flotation concentration methods (mill material).

 

Table 14-13 shows the results for leach material. The portion of the April 27, 2018 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource that was potentially leachable amounted to 100.8 million tonnes at 0.734 g/t gold and 12.67 g/t silver for 2.38 million contained gold ounces and 41.1 million contained silver ounces.

 

For the current Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource, the material that is potentially leachable amounts to 94.6 million tonnes at 0.711 g/t gold and 12.74 g/t silver for 2.16 million contained gold ounces and 38.8 million contained silver ounces. This amounts to 6.1% less tonnes at a 3.2% lower gold grade, a 0.5% higher silver grade for 9.2% less contained gold ounces and 5.6% less contained silver ounces for Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource.

 

The difference in Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource tonnes amounts to 6.2 million tonnes and is primarily due to differences in the interpretation of the oxide domains. There was a decrease in oxide and trans-low material and an increase of trans-sulf and sulfide (mill material) in the new resource model, i.e. there is a net transfer of material from leach material to mill material.

 

The main contributor to the 3.2% lower gold grade is the elimination of the potentially contaminated wet RC samples. It does not appear the new Orla drilling or revised geologic interpretations were significant contributors to the gold grade change.

 

There was also a net transfer of Mineral Resource from the Indicated to the Measured category for the leach material. This is due to some revisions in the classification methods described in Section 14.2.7 compared to the April 27, 2018 Mineral Resource. There was not much net change in classification due to drilling; the new Orla drilling and the elimination of potentially contaminated RC samples about balanced each other in terms of drilling density.

 

It is also noted that the differences in Mineral Resources are almost exclusively due to model differences. The cone shell used to define the Mineral Resource was about the same for both cases and the changes due to economic parameters and cutoff grades are not significant.

 

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-46

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

14.2.9.2 Mill Material

 

Table 14-14 shows the reconciliation for mill material. The portion of the April 27, 2018 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource that was potential mill material amounted to 254.1 million tonnes at 0.889 g/t gold and 7.50 g/t silver for 7.26 million ounces of contained gold and 61.3 million contained silver ounces.

 

For the current Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource, the material that is potentially millable amounts to 258.8 million tonnes at 0.877 g/t gold and 7.40 g/t silver for 7.30 million contained gold ounces and 61.6 million contained silver ounces. This amounts to 1.9% more tonnes at a 1.4% lower gold grade, a 1.3% lower silver grade for 0.4% more contained gold ounces and 0.5% more contained silver ounces for Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource.

 

The 4.7 million tonne increase in Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources is due primarily to the difference in the interpretation of the oxide domains, as discussed in the previous section. The gold and silver grade changes are minimal, but are due mostly to exclusion of the potentially contaminated RC samples.

 

The amount of Measured Mineral Resource in the potential mill material is minimal, but there has been a net transfer of material from the Measured to Indicated category for this material. As described in Section 14.2.7, Measured Mineral Resource below the 1640 bench were reclassified as Indicated Mineral Resource for the current Mineral Resource.

 

14.2.9.3 Total Leach Plus Mill Material

 

Table 14-15 shows the reconciliation for the Mineral Resource, including the leach and mill material. For Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource the current Mineral Resource has 0.4% less tonnes at a 1.5% lower gold grade and 1.5% lower silver grade for 1.9% less contained gold ounces and 2.0% less contained silver ounces. There is virtually no change to the overall Mineral Resource estimate.

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-47

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 14-13
Reconciliation of 2018 versus 2019 Mineral Resource - Leach Material

 

      Gold Silver Gold Silver
Resource Model Kt (g/t) (g/t) (koz) (koz)
April 27, 2018 Mineral Resource          
  Measured Mineral Resource 16,147 0.79 15.4 412.1 8,014
  Indicated Mineral Resource 84,692 0.72 12.1 1,969.3 33,076
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 100,839 0.73 12.7 2,381.3 41,091
  Inferred Mineral Resource 4,858 0.77 5.6 120.6 874
             
Current Mineral Resource - June 7, 2019          
  Measured Mineral Resource 19,391 0.77 14.9 482.3 9,305
  Indicated Mineral Resource 75,249 0.69 12.2 1,680.7 29,471
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 94,640 0.71 12.7 2,163.0 38,776
  Inferred Mineral Resource 4,355 0.86 5.8 119.8 805
             
Percent Difference          
  Measured Mineral Resource 20.1% -2.5% -3.3% 17.1% 16.1%
  Indicated Mineral Resource -11.1% -3.9% 0.3% -14.7% -10.9%
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource -6.1% -3.2% 0.5% -9.2% -5.6%
  Inferred Mineral Resource -10.4% 10.9% 2.8% -0.6% -7.9%
             

 

Table 14-14
Reconciliation of 2018 versus 2019 Mineral Resource - Mill Material

 

      Gold Silver Gold Silver
Resource Model Kt (g/t) (g/t) (koz) (koz)
April 27, 2018 Mineral Resource          
  Measured Mineral Resource 9,818 0.86 7.5 272.6 2,352
  Indicated Mineral Resource 244,251 0.89 7.5 6,992.2 58,934
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 254,069 0.89 7.5 7,264.8 61,286
  Inferred Mineral Resource 60,342 0.87 7.9 1,696.9 15,334
             
Current Mineral Resource - June 7, 2019          
  Measured Mineral Resource 3,358 0.69 9.2 74.2 997
  Indicated Mineral Resource 255,445 0.88 7.4 7,221.4 60,606
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 258,803 0.88 7.4 7,295.6 61,603
  Inferred Mineral Resource 56,564 0.87 7.5 1,576.9 13,713
             
Percent Difference          
  Measured Mineral Resource -65.8% -20.5% 23.9% -72.8% -57.6%
  Indicated Mineral Resource 4.6% -1.2% -1.7% 3.3% 2.8%
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 1.9% -1.4% -1.3% 0.4% 0.5%
  Inferred Mineral Resource -6.3% -0.9% -4.6% -7.1% -10.6%
             

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-48

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 14-15

Reconciliation of 2018 versus 2019 Mineral Resource - Leach & Mill Material

 

      Gold Silver Gold Silver
Resource Model Kt (g/t) (g/t) (koz) (koz)
April 27, 2018 Mineral Resource          
  Measured Mineral Resource 25,965 0.82 12.4 684.6 10,367
  Indicated Mineral Resource 328,943 0.85 8.7 8,961.5 92,010
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 354,908 0.85 9.0 9,646.1 102,377
  Inferred Mineral Resource 65,200 0.87 7.7 1,817.5 16,208
             
Current Mineral Resource - June 7, 2019          
  Measured Mineral Resource 22,749 0.76 14.1 556.5 10,302
  Indicated Mineral Resource 330,694 0.84 8.5 8,902.1 90,078
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource 353,443 0.83 8.8 9,458.6 100,379
  Inferred Mineral Resource 60,919 0.87 7.4 1,696.7 14,518
             
Percent Difference          
  Measured Mineral Resource -12.4% -7.2% 13.4% -18.7% -0.6%
  Indicated Mineral Resource 0.5% -1.2% -2.6% -0.7% -2.1%
  Meas/Ind Mineral Resource -0.4% -1.5% -1.5% -1.9% -2.0%
  Inferred Mineral Resource -6.6% -0.1% -4.1% -6.6% -10.4%
             

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate

Page 14-49

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

15.0 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE

 

15.1 Mineral Reserve

 

Table 15-1 presents the Mineral Reserve for the Camino Rojo Project. The Proven and Probable Mineral Reserve amounts to 44.0 million tonnes at 0.73 g/t Au and 14.2 g/t Ag for 1.03 million contained gold ounces and 20.1 million contained silver ounces. Direct feed material in the Mineral Reserve is material that will be processed the same year it is mined. The low- grade stockpile material will be processed after the open pit is depleted. The effective date of this Mineral Reserve is 24 June 2019.

 

The Mineral Reserve is based on an open pit mine plan and mine production schedule developed by IMC. Processing is based on crushing and heap leaching to recover gold and silver. Table 15-2 shows the parameters used for economic and cut-off calculations. The Mineral Reserve is based on a gold price of US$1250 per ounce and a silver price of US$17.00 per ounce. Measured Mineral Resource in the mine production schedule was converted to Proven Mineral Reserve and Indicated Mineral Resource in the schedule was converted to Probable Mineral Reserve.

 

The Mineral Reserves are classified in accordance with the “CIM Definition Standards – For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” adopted by the CIM Council (as amended, the “CIM Definition Standards”) in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101. Mineral Reserve estimates reflect the reasonable expectation that all necessary permits and approvals will be obtained and maintained. The Project is in a jurisdiction friendly to mining.

 

IMC does not believe that there are significant risks to the Mineral Reserve estimate based on metallurgical or infrastructure factors. There has been a significant amount of metallurgical testing and the infrastructure requirements are relatively straightforward compared to many operations. However, recoveries lower than forecast would result is loss of revenue for the project. There has also been some potential preg-robbing material identified in the deposit, as discussed in Section 13.5 and 25.3.2, but this does not appear to represent a significant risk.

 

There is risk to the Mineral Reserve based on mining factors. As discussed in Section 16.2 and 25.3.1, the slope angle assumptions are based on careful application of wall control blasting, and the north and west wall slope angles are also based on significant mechanical support. Failure of these systems to perform as expected would result in less ore available for the process plant and potentially a shorter project life. Also, slope stability issues on the north wall of the pit could be difficult to mitigate due to lack of access to the ground north of the pit.

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

15.0 Mineral Reserve Estimate

Page 15-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Other risks to the Mineral Reserve are related to economic parameters such as prices lower than forecast or costs higher than the current estimates. The impact of these is modeled in the sensitivity study with the economic analysis in Section 22.10.

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Mineral Reserve estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla as is all the proposed development and mining and processing activities.

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

15.0 Mineral Reserve Estimate

Page 15-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 15-1

Mineral Reserve

 

                Cont. Cont.
          NSR Gold Silver Gold Silver
Reserve Class Ktonnes ($/t) (g/t) (g/t) (koz) (koz)
Proven Mineral Reserve              
  Direct Feed   13,331 22.87 0.84 15.6 358.8 6,698
  Low Grade Stockpile   1,264 7.19 0.27 10.0 10.9 406
  Total Proven Mineral Reserve 14,595 21.51 0.79 15.1 369.7 7,104
Probable Mineral Reserve            
  Direct Feed   25,939 20.27 0.76 14.4 629.8 12,029
  Low Grade Stockpile   3,485 7.05 0.28 8.6 31.3 962
  Total Probable Mineral Reserve 29,424 18.70 0.70 13.7 661.1 12,991
Probable/Probable Mineral Reserve            
  Direct Feed   39,270 21.15 0.78 14.8 988.6 18,726
  Low Grade Stockpile   4,749 7.09 0.28 9.0 42.3 1,368
  Total Probable/Probable Reserve 44,019 19.63 0.73 14.2 1,030.9 20,095

Notes:

1. The Mineral Reserve estimate has an effective date of 24 June 2019 and was prepared using the CIM Definition Standards (10 May 2014).

2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding.

3. Mineral Reserves are based on prices of $1250/oz gold and $17/oz silver.

4. Mineral Reserves are based on NSR cut-offs that vary by time period to balance mine and plant production capacities (see Section 16). They range from a low of $4.73/t to a high of $9.00/t.

5. NSR value for leach material is as follows:

    Kp Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 27.46 x gold (g/t) + 0.057 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 70% and silver recovery of 11%

    Ki Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 21.97 x gold (g/t) + 0.078 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 56% and silver recovery of 15%

    Tran-Hi: NSR ($/t) = 23.54 x gold (g/t) + 0.140 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 60% and silver recovery of 27%

    Tran-Lo: NSR ($/t) = 15.69 x gold (g/t) + 0.177 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 40% and silver recovery of 34%

6. Table 15-2 accompanies this Mineral Reserve estimate and shows all relevant parameters

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

15.0 Mineral Reserve Estimate

Page 15-3

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

15.2 Economic Parameters

 

Table 15-2 shows the parameters for pit design. Only gold and silver are produced for this plan and the only material types considered are the Kp Oxide, Ki Oxide, Transitional Hi, and Transitional Low.

 

Gold and silver prices are US$1250/oz and US$17/oz respectively. IMC believes these prices to be reasonable based on: 1) Historical 3-year trailing averages, 2) prices used by other companies for comparable projects, and 3) long range consensus price forecasts prepared by various bank economists.

 

For mine design, the base mining cost was estimated at US$1.85 per total tonne as previously developed for the PEA study on the Project. This was estimated based on a calculated owner mining cost plus an allowance for equipment depreciation and contractor profit. A cost of US$0.03 per total tonne for wall stabilization is based on a cost estimate developed by Piteau. An allowance of US$0.05 per tonne for pit dewatering has also been included to bring the total mining cost, for design purposes, to US$1.941 per total tonne. The unit costs for mining, processing, and G&A shown on Table 15-2 are preliminary estimates used for design. These differ from the final cost estimates developed by this report that were developed using the design mine plan. The final cost estimates used for the economic analysis are presented in Section 21.

 

Processing is by crushing and heap leaching at a rate of 18,000 tonnes per day or about 6.57 million tonnes per year. The gold and silver recoveries presented on the table were provided by KCA in March 2019 and are based on historical metallurgical testing and the new testing conducted during 2018 and 2019.

 

The processing and G&A costs of US$3.413 and US$1.319 respectively per processed tonne were provided by KCA and are based also based on the updated metallurgical testing.

 

IMC assumed 100% refinery payables for this case. The gold and silver refining costs are also IMC estimates. The oxide material is subject to a 2% NSR royalty.

 

Due to two products, and also variable recoveries by material type, an NSR value was used to tabulate proposed quantities of Mineral Reserves. The gold and silver NSR factors for Kp Oxide are calculated as follows:

 

Gold NSR Factor = ($1250 – $5.00) x 0.70 x 1.00 x 0.98 / 31.103 = US$27.459/t

 

Silver NSR Factor = ($17 – $0.50) x 0.11 x 1.00 x 0.98 / 31.103 = US$0.0572/t

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

15.0 Mineral Reserve Estimate

Page 15-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The units are US$ per gram per tonne. The 0.98 constant represents an allowance for the royalty cost.

 

The NSR value for a block is calculated as:

 

NSR = US$27.459 x gold grade + US$0.0572 x silver grade

 

The breakeven NSR cut-off is US$6.67 per tonne, the mining + process + G&A. The internal NSR cut-off is US$4.73 per tonne, the process + G&A cost. Internal cut-off applies to blocks that have to be removed from the pit, so mining is a sunk cost. Note the NSR cut-off does not vary by material type, so is convenient for mine planning and scheduling. The NSR factors and cut-offs for the other material types are also shown in the table

 

The Mineral Reserves are based on NSR cutoffs that vary by time period to balance mine and plant production capacities. They range from a low of US$4.73/t to a high of US$9.00/t.

 

The Mineral Reserves include allowances for mining dilution and ore loss. IMC believes that reasonable amounts of dilution and loss were incorporated into the block model used for the FS. Compositing assays into composites and estimating blocks with multiple composites introduces some smoothing of model grades that are analogous to dilution and ore loss effects.

 

Only Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource are allowed to contribute to the economics for the Feasibility Study and be converted to Mineral Reserves. Inferred Mineral Resource is treated as waste for the FS.

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

15.0 Mineral Reserve Estimate

Page 15-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 15-2

Economic Parameters for Mine Design

 

Parameter/Material Type Units Kp Oxide Ki Oxide Tran-Hi Tran-Low Waste
Commodity Prices                
  Gold Price Per Ounce   (US$) 1250 1250 1250 1250  
  Silver Price Per Ounce   (US$) 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00  
Mining Cost Per Tonne              
  Contract Mining Cost   (US$) 1.859 1.859 1.859 1.859 1.859
  Allowance for Wall Stabilization (US$) 0.032 0.032 0.032 0.032 0.032
  Allowance for Pit Dewatering (US$) 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050
  Total Mining Cost   (US$) 1.941 1.941 1.941 1.941 1.941
Process and G&A Cost Per Ore Tonne            
  Processing     (US$) 3.413 3.413 3.413 3.413  
  G&A       (US$) 1.319 1.319 1.319 1.319  
  Total Process and G&A   (US$) 4.732 4.732 4.732 4.732  
Plant Recovery                
  Gold       (%) 70% 56% 60% 40%  
  Silver       (%) 11% 15% 27% 34%  
Refinery Payables and Costs              
  Gold Refinery Payable   (%) 100% 100% 100% 100%  
  Silver Refinery Payable   (%) 100% 100% 100% 100%  
  Gold Refining Per Ounce   (US$) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00  
  Silver Refining Per Ounce   (US$) 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50  
Royalties                  
  Royalty       (%) 2% 2% 2% 2%  
NSR Factors                
  Gold NSR Factor     ($/g) 27.459 21.968 23.537 15.691  
  Silver NSR Factor   ($/g) 0.0572 0.0780 0.1404 0.1768  
NSR Cut-offs                
  Breakeven NSR Cut-off ($/t) 6.67 6.67 6.67 6.67  
  Internal NSR Cut-off ($/t) 4.73 4.73 4.73 4.73  

 

     

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

15.0 Mineral Reserve Estimate

Page 15-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

16.0 MINING METHODS

 

16.1 Operating Parameters and Criteria

 

The Feasibility Study is based on a conventional open pit mine. Mine operations will consist of drilling medium diameter blast holes (approximately 17 cm), blasting with explosive emulsions or ANFO (ammonium nitrate/fuel oil) depending on water conditions, and loading into large off-road trucks with hydraulic shovels and wheel loaders. Resource will be delivered to the primary crusher and waste to the waste storage facility southeast of the pit. There will also be a low-grade stockpile facility to store marginally economic Mineral Reserves for processing at the end of commercial pit operations. There will be a fleet of track dozers, rubber-tired dozers, motor graders and water trucks to maintain the working areas of the pit, waste storage areas, and haul roads.

 

A mine plan was developed to supply Mineral Reserves to a conventional crushing and heap leach plant with the capacity to process 18,000 tpd (6,570 ktpy). The mine is scheduled to operate two 10-hour shifts per day for 365 days per year.

 

The mine plan is constrained by the Adjacent Owner concession boundary on the north side of the pit, i.e. the report is based on the assumption that no mining activities, including waste stripping, would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in this FS.

 

The geotechnical parameters relevant to the mine plan are discussed in Section 16.2 and are adequate for this FS.

 

Eventually, mining will be conducted below the water table, probably during Year 4 of commercial operation. Estimates of pit dewatering requirements have been prepared for cost estimation purposes. These are based on the median expected water in-flows. Additional hydrogeological studies underway will allow a better estimate of the pit dewatering requirements.

 

16.2 Slope Angles

 

Several evaluations of slope angles have been conducted for Camino Rojo, all by Piteau. The slope angle design for this FS is based on the report “Recommended Geotechnical Slope Designs Incorporating Reinforcement for the Camino Rojo “Constrained” Pit Feasibility Study”. Figure 16-1 shows the inter-ramp (IR) slope angle recommendations from that report.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

16.0 Mining Methods

Page 16-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The recommended slope design is based on a 38° IR angle for the post mineral rocks on the east side of the pit. The south wall is designed at a 53° IR angle based on double benching 10m benches. Lithology is dipping into the wall on the south side so it is expected to be relatively stable. It is assumed the controlled blasting, such as pre-splitting, will be required to maintain the bench face angles and catch benches.

 

The north and west walls are based on single benching (10m) at a 43° IR angle for the upper 50m of the wall and double benching below that at a 53° IR angle. This design is based on significant support for much of the north and west walls, consisting of drilling holes near the pit edge, insertion of rebar, and grouting with cement. The hole diameter is about 100mm and recommended spacing between holes is 1.7m for the 10m single benches and 0.6m for the 20m double benching. Number 10 rebar is assumed for the support. This is the design basis for the final pit for the FS. Pre-splitting is also assumed to maintain the face angles and catch benches.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

16.0 Mining Methods

Page 16-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 16-1 Slope Angle Recommendations, Piteau 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

16.0 Mining Methods

Page 16-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

16.3 Final Pit Design

 

The final pit design is based on the results of a floating cone analysis using the parameters discussed in the previous section. Figure 16-2 shows the final pit design. Due to space limitations there is only one mining phase, the final pit. The design includes the haul road and sufficient working room for the equipment. The road is 21m wide at a maximum grade of 10%. This will accommodate trucks of approximately 53 to 61 tonne capacity such as Caterpillar 773 or 775 class trucks.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

16.0 Mining Methods

Page 16-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 16-2 Final Pit, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

16.0 Mining Methods

Page 16-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

16.4 Mine Production Schedule

 

The schedule is based on processing the resource by crushing and heap leaching at a production rate of 18,000 tpd, or 6,570 ktpy. Table 16-1 shows the schedule. Preproduction and Year 1 are by months, Year 2 by quarters, and the rest of the schedule is by years.

 

The upper section of the table shows direct crusher feed material by time period. This is material that is processed during the same time period it is mined and amounts to 39.3 million tonnes at 0.78 g/t gold and 14.8 g/t silver. This produces about 988,600 ounces of contained gold and 637,400 ounces of recoverable gold for an average recovery of 64.5%. Contained and recoverable silver amounts to 18.7 and 3.28 million ounces respectively for an average recovery of 17.5%. As discussed, due to two products, gold and silver, and different recoveries for the different material types, an NSR cut-off was used to classify Mineral Reserves and waste for scheduling. The internal NSR cut-off is US$4.73, but this is only used for Years 6 and 7. For the other periods the cut-off varies by period to balance the mine and plant production capacities.

 

Low grade is material between an NSR cut-off of US$5.50 per tonne and the operating cut-off for the year. This amounts to 4.75 million tonnes at 0.28 g/t gold and 9.0 g/t silver. The US$5.50 per tonne low grade stockpile cut-off is the internal cut-off of US$4.73 per tonne and an allowance of US$0.77 per tonne for re-handle costs. This material is processed at the end of commercial pit production during Years 6 and 7.

 

The bottom of Table 16-1 shows that preproduction is 600,000 tonnes of total material. The schedule also shows 100kt of Reserve produced during the final month of preproduction. 63kt of the Reserve is designated as leach pad overliner to be crushed and placed during the final month of preproduction. The remaining 37kt will be placed on the pad during the first month of Year 1. Year 1 Q1 mine production is 822kt, about 50% of plant capacity. Total mine production ramps up during the first quarter of Year 1 to a rate of about 1,100 ktonnes per month or 3,300kt per quarter for Years 1 through 3; the peak material movement is 13.2 million tonnes during Year 2. Total material is 67.7 million tonnes. Waste, net of the low grade, is 23.7 million tonnes for an average waste strip ratio of 0.54 to 1.

 

Table 16-2 shows a proposed plant production schedule, including the direct feed material and the low grade stockpile. As previously discussed, the 100kt of preproduction Reserves is distributed between preproduction month 3 pad overliner (63kt), and 37kt added to Year 1 month 1 production. The low grade stockpile material is processed during Years 6 and 7. Total processed Reserve is 44.0 million tonnes at 0.73 g/t gold and 14.2 g/t silver. This amounts to 1.03 million ounces of contained gold and 20.1 million ounces of contained silver respectively. Recoverable gold and silver are 662,300 ounces and 3.48 million ounces respectively for average recoveries of 64% for gold and 17% for silver. The commercial Project life, including the low-grade stockpile, is about 6¾ years.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

16.0 Mining Methods

Page 16-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 16-3 shows the proposed plant schedule by material type.

 

Figure 16-3 though Figure 16-11 show the pit, waste storage, and low-grade stockpile at the end of each mining year. There are two figures for Year 7, one showing end of mining, and the other showing the end of capping the waste storage facility and low-grade stockpile reclaim.

 

The mine production schedule includes allowances for mining dilution and ore loss. IMC believes that reasonable amounts of dilution and loss were incorporated into the block model used for the FS. Compositing assays into composites and estimating blocks with multiple composites introduces some smoothing of model grades that are analogous to dilution and ore loss effects.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

16.0 Mining Methods

Page 16-7

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 16-1
Mine Production Schedule - 6,570 KTPY

 

MINE PRODUCTION SCHEDULE: (Units) TOTAL PP
M1
PP
M2
PP
M3
Yr1
M1
Yr1
M2
Yr1
M3
Yr1
M4
Yr1
M5
Yr1
M6
Yr1
M7
Yr1
M8
Yr1
M9
Yr1
M10
Yr1
M11
Yr1
M12
Yr2
Q1
Yr2
Q2
Yr2
Q3
Yr2
Q4
Year
3
Year
4
Year
5
Year
6
Year
7
LEACH RESERVE:                                                    
NSR Cut-off ($/t)   8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 7.00 7.25 7.50 9.00 9.00 9.00 4.73 4.73
Ktonnes (kt) 39,272 0 0 100 100 212 510 548 549 548 546 548 548 548 547 549 1,643 1,645 1,642 1,642 6,569 6,570 6,570 6,215 923
NSR ($/t) 21.15 0.00 0.00 20.30 30.32 26.88 21.19 16.81 17.28 25.02 18.47 14.43 10.77 12.49 19.37 25.86 16.23 20.46 18.35 22.84 21.27 24.16 23.54 19.74 18.88
Gold (g/t) 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.72 1.08 0.97 0.79 0.59 0.63 0.95 0.68 0.51 0.40 0.46 0.69 0.94 0.60 0.74 0.66 0.82 0.76 0.86 0.87 0.81 0.80
Silver (g/t) 14.8 0.0 0.0 11.7 11.6 10.6 9.8 12.7 10.4 9.2 8.6 9.7 9.6 11.2 11.7 10.3 9.7 12.0 10.6 12.0 12.9 15.5 17.3 20.8 21.2
Lead (%) 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.37 0.35 0.30 0.31 0.29 0.30 0.25 0.33 0.26 0.25 0.31 0.33 0.25 0.28 0.33 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.27 0.19 0.18
Zinc (%) 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.29 0.27 0.29 0.32 0.27 0.25 0.24 0.31 0.28 0.36 0.34 0.28 0.27 0.33 0.31 0.34 0.34 0.33 0.44 0.52 0.49
Arsenic (ppm) 734 0 0 944 1,024 1,029 888 562 665 906 889 910 635 583 657 880 663 667 757 780 814 746 731 636 643
Sulphur (%) 0.494 0.000 0.000 0.587 0.563 0.654 0.407 0.178 0.299 0.381 0.337 0.309 0.192 0.161 0.209 0.347 0.184 0.160 0.268 0.164 0.183 0.236 0.760 1.214 1.124
Recovered Gold (g/t) 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.76 0.67 0.52 0.41 0.42 0.62 0.46 0.35 0.26 0.30 0.48 0.64 0.40 0.50 0.45 0.56 0.52 0.59 0.56 0.43 0.40
Recovered Silver (g/t) 2.6 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.9 3.4 5.8 6.5
Contained Gold (koz) 988.6 0.0 0.0 2.3 3.5 6.6 13.0 10.3 11.2 16.7 12.0 9.1 7.0 8.1 12.2 16.6 31.5 39.2 35.0 43.3 160.0 181.9 184.3 161.3 23.8
Recoverable Gold (koz) 637.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 2.4 4.6 8.6 7.2 7.5 11.0 8.0 6.2 4.5 5.3 8.4 11.3 21.0 26.6 23.9 29.8 110.5 124.8 117.3 85.1 11.7
Contained Silver (koz) 18,725 0 0 38 37 72 161 224 184 163 152 171 170 198 206 182 511 634 559 633 2,716 3,284 3,651 4,150 629
Recoverable Silver (koz) 3,275 0 0 4 4 8 19 25 23 21 18 20 22 24 23 21 62 74 65 73 305 395 716 1,161 192
Gold Recovery (%) 64.5% 0.0% 0.0% 69.9% 69.8% 68.9% 66.0% 69.8% 66.9% 65.7% 66.9% 68.6% 64.9% 65.8% 68.8% 68.2% 66.8% 68.0% 68.2% 68.8% 69.1% 68.6% 63.7% 52.8% 49.3%
Silver Recovery (%) 17.5% 0.0% 0.0% 11.0% 11.1% 11.4% 12.0% 11.1% 12.3% 12.7% 12.1% 11.5% 12.7% 12.0% 11.4% 11.7% 12.1% 11.6% 11.6% 11.5% 11.2% 12.0% 19.6% 28.0% 30.6%
LOW GRADE STOCKPILE:                                                    
NSR Cut-off ($/t)   5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50
Ktonnes (kt) 4,748 0 0 3 1 65 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 142 67 69 129 248 136 1,738 1,266 660 0 0
NSR ($/t) 7.09 0.00 0.00 6.88 8.61 6.63 7.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.39 6.31 6.41 5.74 6.19 6.35 6.50 7.24 7.38 7.24 0.00 0.00
Gold (g/t) 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.30 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.23 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.28 0.28 0.31 0.00 0.00
Silver (g/t) 9.0 0.0 0.0 11.5 5.1 7.2 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 7.0 6.9 6.8 6.4 7.8 7.1 9.2 9.4 10.0 0.0 0.0
Lead (%) 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.05 0.16 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.18 0.09 0.16 0.12 0.14 0.00 0.00
Zinc (%) 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.19 0.19 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.27 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.24 0.22 0.28 0.00 0.00
Arsenic (ppm) 456 0 0 1,299 530 433 530 0 0 0 0 0 0 586 506 523 348 384 452 356 459 441 467 0 0
Sulphur (%) 0.227 0.000 0.000 0.839 0.485 0.469 0.342 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.225 0.101 0.156 0.057 0.047 0.124 0.043 0.080 0.199 0.784 0.000 0.000
Recovered Gold (g/t) 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.21 0.15 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.00 0.00
Recovered Silver (g/t) 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.6 1.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.3 2.2 0.0 0.0
Contained Gold (koz) 42.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.2 0.6 0.5 1.1 2.0 1.2 15.4 11.5 6.5 0.0 0.0
Recoverable Gold (koz) 24.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.2 0.7 9.4 7.0 3.3 0.0 0.0
Contained Silver (koz) 1,368 0 0 1 0 15 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 32 15 15 27 62 31 513 383 211 0 0
Recoverable Silver (koz) 203 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 2 2 4 8 4 67 53 47 0 0
Gold Recovery (%) 58.8% 0.0% 0.0% 70.0% 70.0% 56.2% 61.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 61.6% 56.8% 58.3% 57.1% 56.5% 59.8% 57.9% 61.2% 60.4% 50.8% 0.0% 0.0%
Silver Recovery (%) 14.8% 0.0% 0.0% 11.0% 11.0% 14.9% 13.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.7% 14.5% 14.3% 14.2% 14.6% 13.6% 14.2% 13.1% 13.8% 22.3% 0.0% 0.0%
TOTAL MATERIAL AND WASTE:                                                    
Total Material (kt) 67,748 100 200 300 587 1,000 1,093 1,100 1,101 1,099 1,100 1,099 1,097 1,100 1,100 1,100 3,300 3,301 3,299 3,301 12,778 10,273 9,134 8,198 988
Waste (Net of Low Grade) (kt) 23,728 100 200 197 486 723 462 552 552 551 554 551 549 449 411 484 1,588 1,527 1,409 1,523 4,471 2,437 1,904 1,983 65
Waste Ratio (none) 0.54 0.00 0.00 1.91 4.81 2.61 0.73 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.00 0.69 0.60 0.79 0.93 0.86 0.75 0.86 0.54 0.31 0.26 0.32 0.07

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

16.0 Mining Methods

Page 16-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 16-2
Proposed Plant Production Schedule - 6,570 KTPY

 

PLANT PRODUCTION SCHEDULE: (Units) TOTAL PP
M1
PP
M2
PP
M3
Yr1
M1
Yr1
M2
Yr1 M3 Yr1
M4
Yr1
M5
Yr1
M6
Yr1
M7
Yr1
M8
Yr1
M9
Yr1
M10
Yr1
M11
Yr1
M12
Yr2
Q1
Yr2
Q2
Yr2
Q3
Yr2
Q4
Year
3
Year
4
Year
5
Year
6
Year
7
LEACH RESOURCE:                                                    
NSR Cut-off ($/t)   8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 7.00 7.25 7.50 9.00 9.00 9.00 4.73 4.73
Ktonnes (kt) 44,020 0 0 63 137 212 510 548 549 548 546 548 548 548 547 549 1,643 1,645 1,642 1,642 6,569 6,570 6,570 6,570 5,316
NSR ($/t) 19.63 0.00 0.00 20.30 27.61 26.88 21.19 16.81 17.28 25.02 18.47 14.43 10.77 12.49 19.37 25.86 16.23 20.46 18.35 22.84 21.27 24.16 23.54 19.07 9.12
Gold (g/t) 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.98 0.97 0.79 0.59 0.63 0.95 0.68 0.51 0.40 0.46 0.69 0.94 0.60 0.74 0.66 0.82 0.76 0.86 0.87 0.78 0.36
Silver (g/t) 14.2 0.0 0.0 11.7 11.6 10.6 9.8 12.7 10.4 9.2 8.6 9.7 9.6 11.2 11.7 10.3 9.7 12.0 10.6 12.0 12.9 15.5 17.3 20.1 11.1
Lead (%) 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.38 0.35 0.30 0.31 0.29 0.30 0.25 0.33 0.26 0.25 0.31 0.33 0.25 0.28 0.33 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.27 0.19 0.15
Zinc (%) 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.32 0.27 0.29 0.32 0.27 0.25 0.24 0.31 0.28 0.36 0.34 0.28 0.27 0.33 0.31 0.34 0.34 0.33 0.44 0.51 0.28
Arsenic (ppm) 704 0 0 944 1003 1029 888 562 665 906 889 910 635 583 657 880 663 667 757 780 814 746 731 627 487
Sulphur (%) 0.465 0.000 0.000 0.587 0.569 0.654 0.407 0.178 0.299 0.381 0.337 0.309 0.192 0.161 0.209 0.347 0.184 0.160 0.268 0.164 0.183 0.236 0.760 1.218 0.312
Recovered Gold (g/t) 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.69 0.67 0.52 0.41 0.42 0.62 0.46 0.35 0.26 0.30 0.48 0.64 0.40 0.50 0.45 0.56 0.52 0.59 0.56 0.41 0.20
Recovered Silver (g/t) 2.5 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.9 3.4 5.7 2.1
Contained Gold (koz) 1,030.9 0.0 0.0 1.4 4.3 6.6 13.0 10.3 11.2 16.7 12.0 9.1 7.0 8.1 12.2 16.6 31.5 39.2 35.0 43.3 160.0 181.9 184.3 165.2 62.2
Recoverable Gold (koz) 662.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 4.6 8.6 7.2 7.5 11.0 8.0 6.2 4.5 5.3 8.4 11.3 21.0 26.6 23.9 29.8 110.5 124.8 117.3 86.8 34.9
Contained Silver (koz) 20,093 0 0 24 51 72 161 224 184 163 152 171 170 198 206 182 511 634 559 633 2,716 3,284 3,651 4,250 1,897
Recoverable Silver (koz) 3,478 0 0 3 6 8 19 25 23 21 18 20 22 24 23 21 62 74 65 73 305 395 716 1,193 363
Gold Recovery (%) 64.2% 0.0% 0.0% 69.9% 69.8% 68.9% 66.0% 69.8% 66.9% 65.7% 66.9% 68.6% 64.9% 65.8% 68.8% 68.2% 66.8% 68.0% 68.2% 68.8% 69.1% 68.6% 63.7% 52.6% 56.2%
Silver Recovery (%) 17.3% 0.0% 0.0% 11.0% 11.1% 11.4% 12.0% 11.1% 12.3% 12.7% 12.1% 11.5% 12.7% 12.0% 11.4% 11.7% 12.1% 11.6% 11.6% 11.5% 11.2% 12.0% 19.6% 28.1% 19.1%

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

16.0 Mining Methods

Page 16-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 16-3
Proposed Plant Production Schedule by Material Type - 6,570 KTPY

 

MATERIAL TYPE: (Units) TOTAL PP
M1
PP
M2
PP
M3
Yr1
M1
Yr1
M2
Yr1
M3
Yr1
M4
Yr1
M5
Yr1
M6
Yr1
M7
Yr1
M8
Yr1
M9
Yr1
M10
Yr1
M11
Yr1
M12
Yr2
Q1
Yr2
Q2
Yr2
Q3
Yr2
Q4
Year
3
Year
4
Year
5
Year
6
Year
7
KP Oxide:                                                    
Ktonnes (kt) 27,154 0 0 63 134 182 369 530 319 290 379 470 288 372 452 433 1,127 1,306 1,350 1,376 6,034 5,685 3,769 608 1,618
NSR ($/t) 22.32 0 0 20.3 27.92 29.35 22.2 17.14 24.11 34.65 21.59 15.41 14 13.62 21.75 29.39 19.03 22.57 19.88 25.25 21.77 25.41 25.45 28.44 7.44
Gold (g/t) 0.78 0 0 0.72 0.99 1.05 0.79 0.6 0.85 1.24 0.77 0.54 0.49 0.47 0.77 1.05 0.67 0.8 0.7 0.89 0.77 0.89 0.89 0.99 0.25
Silver (g/t) 13.7 0 0 11.7 11.7 11.1 10.4 12.9 11.9 10.1 9.1 9.9 10.6 12.5 12.6 10.8 10.3 12.9 11.1 12.8 13.2 16.2 15.6 21.9 11.4
Lead (%) 0.31 0 0 0.42 0.39 0.38 0.36 0.31 0.33 0.42 0.31 0.36 0.36 0.31 0.33 0.38 0.3 0.32 0.37 0.35 0.32 0.3 0.27 0.2 0.22
Zinc (%) 0.35 0 0 0.4 0.32 0.28 0.31 0.32 0.29 0.27 0.25 0.33 0.35 0.43 0.35 0.28 0.29 0.36 0.34 0.37 0.35 0.35 0.38 0.43 0.31
Arsenic (ppm) 788 0 0 944 1013 1067 967 559 768 1040 1024 960 868 630 692 948 772 700 842 849 836 780 761 637 581
Sulphur (%) 0.232 0 0 0.587 0.575 0.568 0.428 0.18 0.346 0.617 0.357 0.338 0.325 0.137 0.222 0.418 0.249 0.179 0.32 0.187 0.192 0.21 0.21 0.264 0.187
Recovered Gold (g/t) 0.55 0 0 0.5 0.69 0.73 0.55 0.42 0.6 0.87 0.54 0.38 0.34 0.33 0.54 0.73 0.47 0.56 0.49 0.63 0.54 0.62 0.63 0.69 0.17
Recovered Silver (g/t) 1.5 0 0 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.1 1 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.7 2.4 1.3
KI Oxide:                                                    
Ktonnes (kt) 6,757 0 0 0 3 30 141 18 230 258 167 78 260 176 95 116 516 339 292 266 505 542 48 37 2,640
NSR ($/t) 9.92 0 0 0 14.1 11.91 18.55 7.19 7.81 14.2 11.39 8.51 7.2 10.11 8.03 12.69 10.13 12.31 11.28 10.39 15.8 14.11 12.97 5.45 6.84
Gold (g/t) 0.42 0 0 0 0.61 0.51 0.82 0.3 0.33 0.62 0.49 0.36 0.3 0.43 0.34 0.55 0.43 0.53 0.48 0.45 0.69 0.61 0.56 0.21 0.28
Silver (g/t) 8.1 0 0 0 7.8 7.9 8.3 7.8 8.4 8.3 7.6 8.3 8.5 8.6 7.5 8.6 8.4 8.5 8.3 7.9 8.8 8.1 10 11 7.6
Lead (%) 0.13 0 0 0 0.09 0.19 0.16 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.11 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.21 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.1 0.16 0.1 0.1 0.09 0.1
Zinc (%) 0.21 0 0 0 0.22 0.22 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.2 0.22 0.27 0.26 0.22 0.23 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.17 0.22 0.24 0.2
Arsenic (ppm) 458 0 0 0 547 799 683 653 523 756 582 608 377 484 490 628 425 539 362 423 561 472 497 364 378
Sulphur (%) 0.107 0 0 0 0.29 1.179 0.351 0.109 0.233 0.116 0.291 0.137 0.045 0.213 0.145 0.083 0.041 0.089 0.026 0.048 0.082 0.079 0.072 0.211 0.096
Recovered Gold (g/t) 0.24 0 0 0 0.34 0.29 0.46 0.17 0.18 0.35 0.28 0.2 0.17 0.24 0.19 0.31 0.24 0.3 0.27 0.25 0.39 0.34 0.31 0.12 0.16
Recovered Silver (g/t) 1.2 0 0 0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.1
Transitional High:                                                    
Ktonnes (kt) 5,746 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 318 2,012 2,949 437
NSR ($/t) 21.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.07 19.83 22.58 21.71 22.82
Gold (g/t) 0.81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.46 0.74 0.84 0.79 0.83
Silver (g/t) 21.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.3 17.3 19.5 22.6 23.1
Lead (%) 0.23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.07 0.25 0.29 0.19 0.19
Zinc (%) 0.49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.13 0.36 0.5 0.5 0.43
Arsenic (ppm) 661 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 605 628 698 635 690
Sulphur (%) 0.807 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.014 0.972 1.117 0.615 0.606
Recovered Gold (g/t) 0.48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.28 0.44 0.51 0.47 0.5
Recovered Silver (g/t) 5.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 4.7 5.3 6.1 6.2
Transitional Low:                                                    
Ktonnes (kt) 4,363 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 741 2,976 621
NSR ($/t) 14.94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.77 17.12 14.71 13.56
Gold (g/t) 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0.86 0.74 0.68
Silver (g/t) 17.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 20.3 17.4 16.7
Lead (%) 0.19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.04 0.27 0.19 0.15
Zinc (%) 0.53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.58 0.54 0.46
Arsenic (ppm) 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 367 687 620 562
Sulphur (%) 2.021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.223 2.636 2.022 1.353
Recovered Gold (g/t) 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.28 0.35 0.3 0.27
Recovered Silver (g/t) 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 6.9 5.9 5.7

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

16.0 Mining Methods

Page 16-10

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

16.5 Waste Storage Area and Stockpile

 

A waste rock storage area was designed southeast of the pit to hold the waste rock for the pit. Table 16-4 shows a summary of total mine waste by waste type. Waste for each combination of lithology (post mineral or Caracol), alteration type (Kp, Ki, or none), and oxidation type is shown. The lead, zinc, arsenic, and sulphur grades are also reported by waste type.

 

Table 16-4
Mine Waste by Material Type

 

  Waste Lead Zinc Arsenic Sulphur
Waste Type Ktonnes (%) (%) (ppm) (%)
Post Mineral: 3,485 0.04 0.05 128 0.107
Caracol Kp Oxide: 208 0.23 0.28 625 0.258
Caracol Kp TrH: 2 0.21 0.43 617 0.423
Caracol Kp TrL: 83 0.08 0.25 317 0.734
Caracol Kp TrS: 519 0.16 0.48 599 3.209
Caracol Kp Slf: 396 0.20 0.72 620 4.801
Caracol Ki Oxide: 8,358 0.06 0.15 274 0.145
Caracol Ki TrH: 207 0.04 0.11 236 0.427
Caracol Ki TrL: 696 0.05 0.14 253 1.181
Caracol Ki TrS: 137 0.06 0.28 299 2.185
Caracol Ki Slf: 21 0.06 0.17 248 1.591
Caracol None Oxide: 7,017 0.03 0.07 147 0.060
Caracol None TrH: 58 0.01 0.07 144 0.119
Caracol None TrL: 931 0.01 0.07 123 0.246
Caracol None TrS: 1,396 0.02 0.08 121 0.763
Caracol None Slf: 214 0.01 0.05 86 0.692
TOTAL: 23,728 0.05 0.12 213 0.353

 

Guidance for the design of the waste storage area was provided by HydroGeoLogica in the memo report “Camino Rojo – Waste Rock Management Plan” dated 28 June 2019 as summarized herein. It was recommended that transition and sulphide material be blended with, or encapsulated by, post mineral or oxide materials. It is expected that this will provide excess neutralization potential (NP) for neutralization of localized acidic conditions in the waste storage facility. It was also recommended a minimum of 5m of post mineral or oxide waste be developed as a base layer prior to placement of transition and sulphide waste and also that transition or sulphide waste be encapsulated with a minimum of 3m of post mineral or oxide waste on top or on the side slopes of the facility. The current design exceeds this amount on the top and side slopes.

 

Total waste amounts to 23.7 million tonnes. Of this, about 4.7 million tonnes is transition or sulphide material to be encapsulated. Average in-situ bulk density of the waste is estimated at 2.35 tonnes per cubic metre. The waste storage design assumes 30% swell, so average density of the placed waste is about 1.81 tonnes per cubic metre.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Assocites
June, 2019
  16.0 Mining Methods
Page 16-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Preproduction and Year 1 produce 6.8 million tonnes of waste, and none of the waste is transition or sulphide. This is shown in Figure 16-4. The main part of the facility is raised to the 1940 level, but a hole or sink has been developed in which to place sulphide waste.

 

Year 2 produces about 6 million tonnes of waste, again all oxide. See Figure 16-5. The facility is extended to the southeast for the 1940 lift and a 1960 lift has been started.

 

Year 3 produces about 4.5 million tonnes of waste of which 450 ktonnes are transition or sulphide. The transition/sulphide is placed in the hole and the clean waste raises most of the facility to the 1950 level and extends the 1960 lift to the east. The placement of new transition and sulphide material is shown in red on Figure 16-6.

 

Year 4 produces about 2.4 million tonnes of waste and about 1.1 million tonnes is transition or sulphide waste. Figure 16-7 shows placement of the transition and sulphide material in the hole. Clean waste is used to raise the facility to the 1970 lift in the north and east.

 

Year 5 produces 1.9 million tonnes of waste and 1.2 million is transition or sulphide material. Figure 16-8 shows the sulphide placed in the centre of the facility on the 1950 and 1955 lifts. The oxide waste is stacked around it on those lifts, mostly on the 1955 lift.

 

Year 6 produces about 2.0 million tonnes of waste and 1.8 million tonnes are transition or sulphide. This raises the facility to the 1965 lift in the centre, with oxide waste stacked around it on the 1955 level as shown on Figure 16-9.

 

Year 7 waste is only 64 ktonnes, all transition or sulphide. Its’ placement is shown in Figure 16-10 which shows the pit and waste storage area at the end of mining.

 

At the end of mining about 1.65 million tonnes will be re-handled to cap the transition and sulphide material. Figure 16-11 shows the final facility with the transition and sulphide waste encapsulated.

 

The stability of the waste storage facility was analysed by Piteau. This is documented in the memo report “Waste Rock Facility and Heap Leach Pad – Preliminary Stability Analyses” dated 18 April 2019 as summarized herein. It was concluded that there are no short term or long-term risks of significant instability for the facility.

 

The mine plan also produces about 5 million tonnes of low-grade material that will be stockpiled and processed at the end of commercial pit production. This is also shown on the various maps.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Assocites
June, 2019
  16.0 Mining Methods
Page 16-12

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 16-3 End of Preproduction, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Assocites
June, 2019
  16.0 Mining Methods
Page 16-13

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 16-4 End of Year 1, IMC 2019

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Assocites
June, 2019
  16.0 Mining Methods
Page 16-14

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 16-5 End of Year 2, IMC 2019 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Assocites
June, 2019
  16.0 Mining Methods
Page 16-15

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 16-6 End of Year 3, IMC 2019 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Assocites
June, 2019
  16.0 Mining Methods
Page 16-16

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 16-7 End of Year 4, IMC 2019 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Assocites
June, 2019
  16.0 Mining Methods
Page 16-17

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 16-8 End of Year 5, IMC 2019 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Assocites
June, 2019
  16.0 Mining Methods
Page 16-18

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 16-9 End of Year 6, IMC 2019 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Assocites
June, 2019
  16.0 Mining Methods
Page 16-19

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 16-10 Year 7 – End of Mining, IMC 2019 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Assocites
June, 2019
  16.0 Mining Methods
Page 16-20

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 16-11 Year 7 – End of Waste Storage Capping & Low Grade Reclaim, IMC 2019 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Assocites
June, 2019
  16.0 Mining Methods
Page 16-21

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

16.6 Mining Equipment

 

Mine major equipment requirements were sized and estimated on a first principles basis based on the mine production schedule, the mine work schedule, and estimated equipment productivity rates. The mine equipment estimate is based on contract-miner operation and assumes a well-managed mining operation with a well-trained labour pool.

 

Table 16-5 shows major equipment requirements by year. This table represents the equipment required to perform the following duties:

 

· Developing access roads from the mine to the crusher, waste storage area, and the low-grade stockpile,
· Mining and transporting resource to the crusher or low-grade stockpile,
· Mining and transporting waste to the waste storage facility,
· Maintaining the haul roads and waste storage areas.

 

Table 16-5
Mine Major Equipment Fleet Requirement

 
  Capacity/ Time Period
Equipment Type Power PP Y1Q1 Y1Q2 Y1Q3 Y1Q4 2 3 4 5 6 7
Atlas Copco DM30 II Drill (171 mm) 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 0
Caterpillar 6018FS Hyd Shovel (10 cu m) 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1
Caterpillar 992K Wheel Loader (11.5 cu m) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Caterpillar 773G Truck (53 t) 2 7 9 10 10 10 12 11 12 11 4
Caterpillar D9T Track Dozer (306 kw) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1
Caterpillar 824H Wheel Dozer (264 kw) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1
Caterpillar 14M Motor Grader (193 kw) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1
Water Truck - 14,000 gal (53,000 l) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1
Caterpillar 319DL Excavator (1.13 cu m) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
Sandvik DX680 TH Drill (102 mm) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
TOTAL   16 23 26 27 27 27 29 27 28 23 10
 

Note: Equipment in the table above was used for mine cost estimations. Actual equipment will vary by contractor.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

16.0 Mining Methods

Page 16-22

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

17.0 RECOVERY METHODS

 

17.1 Process Design Basis

 

Test work results developed by KCA and others have indicated that the Camino Rojo Mineral Reserve is amenable to heap leaching for the recovery of gold and silver. Based on the Mineral Reserve of 44.0 million tonnes and established processing rate of 18,000 tpd of ore, the Project has an estimated mine life of approximately 6.8 years.

 

This report models a scenario where ore is mined by standard open pit mining methods. Ore will be crushed at a rate of 18,000 tonnes per day to 80% passing 28mm using a two-stage closed crushing circuit and conveyor stacked on the leach pad in 10-metre lifts. Lime will be added to the material for pH control before being stacked and leached with a dilute cyanide solution. Pregnant solution will flow by gravity to a pregnant solution pond before being pumped to a Merrill-Crowe plant for metal recovery. Gold and silver will be precipitated from the pregnant solution via zinc cementation. The precious metal precipitate will be dewatered using filters, dried in a mercury retort to remove mercury values, and smelted to produce the final doré product.

 

A summary of the processing design criteria is presented in Table 17-1. A detailed process design criteria document is referenced in Section 27 of this report.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 17-1
Processing Design Criteria Summary

 

ITEM DESIGN CRITERIA
Annual Tonnage Processed 6,570,000 tonnes
Crushing Production Rate 18,000 tonnes/day average
Crushing Operation 8 hours/shift, 3 shifts/day, 7 days/week
Crusher Availability 75%
Crushing Product Size 80% -28mm
Conveyor Stacking System Availability 80%
Leaching Cycle, days (Total) 80
Average Sodium Cyanide Consumption, kg/t 0.35
Average Lime Consumption, kg/t 1.25
Average Oxide Gold Recovery, Kp 70%
Average Oxide Gold Recovery, Ki 56%
Average Transition-Hi Gold Recovery 60%
Average Transition-Lo Gold Recovery 40%
Overall Gold Recovery 64%
Average Oxide Silver Recovery, Kp 11%
Average Oxide Silver Recovery, Ki 15%
Average Transition-Hi Silver Recovery 27%
Average Transition-Lo Silver Recovery 34%
Overall Silver Recovery 17%

 

17.2 Process Summary

 

Ore will be mined using standard open pit mining methods and delivered to the crushing circuit using haul trucks which will direct-dump into a dump hopper; front-end loaders will feed material to the dump hopper as needed from a ROM stockpile located near the primary crusher. Ore will be crushed at a rate of 18,000 tonnes per day to a final product size of 80% passing 28mm (100% passing 38mm) using a two-stage closed crushing circuit. The crushing circuit will operate 7 days/week, 24 hours/day with an overall estimated availability of 75%.

 

The crushed product will be stockpiled using a fixed stacker, reclaimed by belt feeders to a reclaim conveyor, and conveyed to the heap stacking system by an overland conveyor system. Pebble lime will be added to the reclaim conveyor belt for pH control; agglomeration with cement is not needed.

 

Stacked ore will be leached using a drip irrigation system for solution application; sprinkler irrigation will be used beginning in Year 4 of operations to increase evaporation rates and reduce water treatment requirements from pit dewatering. After percolating through the ore, the gold and silver bearing pregnant leach solution drains by gravity to a pregnant solution pond where it will be collected and pumped to a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant. Pregnant solution will then be pumped through clarification filter presses to remove any suspended solids before being deaerated in a vacuum tower to remove oxygen. Ultra-fine zinc will be added to the deaerated pregnant solution to precipitate gold and silver values, which will be collected by precipitate filter presses. Barren leach solution leaving the precipitate filter presses will flow to a barren solution tank and will then be pumped to the heap for further leaching. High strength cyanide solution will be injected into the barren solution to maintain the cyanide concentration in the leach solutions at the desired levels.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The precipitate from the Merrill-Crowe recovery plant will be processed in the refinery. Precipitate will be treated by an electric mercury retort with a fume collection system for drying and removal of mercury before being mixed with fluxes and smelted using an induction smelting furnace to produce the final doré product.

 

An event pond is included to collect contact solution from storm events. Solution collected will be returned to the process as soon as practical. Evaporators will be installed in the event pond in Year 3 of operation to treat excess solution generated by pit dewatering.

 

Figure 17-1 shows the overall process flowsheet and Figure 17-2 shows the general arrangement of the mine site.

 

All selected processes and equipment are established technologies used in gold and silver processing plants.

 

The overall plant site has been arranged to allow for possible future expansion.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 17-1 Process Overall Flowsheet

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 17-2 Project General Arrangement

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

17.3 Crushing

 

The following major components are included in the crushing facility:

 

· 200-tonne ROM Dump hopper with static grizzly;
· Hydraulic Rock breaker;
· 2,134mm x 7.32m Apron feeder;
· 1.52m x 3.05m Vibrating grizzly feeder;
· 1500mm x 2000mm Primary jaw crusher;
· Two each 2.4m x 7.3m Double deck vibrating screens;
· Two each 500 HP Standard cone crushers; and
· Associated transfer conveyors, chutes and instruments.

 

ROM ore will be transported from the mine pit in 53-tonne surface haul trucks and will either be directly dumped into the crusher dump hopper or stockpiled in a ROM stockpile; approximately 4.4 million tonnes of low-grade material from the pit will be stockpiled in a low-grade stockpile and processed at the end of the mine life. Stockpiled ore from the ROM stockpile will be reclaimed by a 992 front-end loader and fed to the dump hopper as needed, primarily for the daily four-hour period when mining operations are suspended. Oversized rocks or large lumps will be broken using a rock breaker. The crushing plant will process an average of 18,000 tonnes of ore per day.

 

Ore will be fed from the ROM dump hopper to a vibrating grizzly feeder via an apron feeder. The vibrating grizzly feeder will have parallel bars spaced 175mm apart with grizzly oversize being fed to the primary jaw crusher and the grizzly undersize being recombined with the jaw crusher product on the primary crusher discharge conveyor. The primary jaw crusher will operate with a 175mm discharge setting and has been oversized to allow for increased throughput for potential future expansion. The primary crusher discharge conveyor transfers primary crushed ore to the screen feed conveyor, which feeds the secondary screens. A tramp metal electromagnet and metal detector will be installed on the primary crusher discharge conveyor to protect the secondary crushers.

 

Primary crushed ore will be fed to a splitter chute by the secondary screen feed conveyor which directly feeds the two secondary screens. The secondary screens splitter chute will be equipped with an adjustable gate to allow for control and accurate split of the crushed material between the screens. The secondary screening circuit includes two double-deck vibrating screens with 100mm and 38mm top and bottom deck openings, respectively. Oversize material (+38mm) will be fed to the secondary cone crushers and undersize (-38mm) will be transferred to the crushed product stockpile stacker by the secondary screen undersize conveyor. Oversize material will be crushed by the secondary standard cone crushers which will operate with a 38mm closed side setting and will discharge onto the secondary crushers discharge conveyor. The secondary crushing circuit will be operated in closed circuit with the secondary crusher discharge conveyor feeding a recycle conveyor which recycles the cone product to the secondary screen feed conveyor.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The secondary screen undersize (crushed product) will be 80% passing 28mm (100% passing 38mm). Crushed product will be transferred to the crushed product stockpile stacker by the screen undersize conveyor located beneath the secondary screens. The crushed product will be stockpiled in a conical stockpile which will be reclaimed using belt feeders and conveyed to the leach pad for stacking. The crushed product stockpile is approximately 60m in diameter and has an estimated live capacity of 6,000 tonnes, or about 8 hours of operation.

 

A modular motor control centre will be located in a container near the secondary crushing circuit. A PLC control unit will be located in a central control room which will control and monitor all crushing equipment, as well as monitor the conveyor stacking equipment. All of the conveyors will be interlocked so that if one conveyor trips out, all upstream conveyors and the vibrating grizzly feeder will also trip. This interlocking is designed to prevent large spills and equipment damage. Both of these features are considered necessary to meet the design utilization for the system.

 

Water sprays will be located at all material transfer points to reduce dust generation by the crushing circuit.

 

17.4 Reclamation and Conveyor Stacking

 

The following major components are included in the reclamation and conveyor stacking system:

 

· Two each 1524mm x 6m reclaim belt feeders
· 120-tonne lime silo with associated dust control and feeding equipment
· 1067mm x 348m overland conveyor
· Four each 1067mm x 35m standard grasshopper transfer conveyors
· Three each 1067mm x 205m overland transfer conveyor
· 12 each 1067mm x 35m grasshopper ramp conveyors
· 15 each standard grasshopper conveyors
· 1067mm x 18m index feed conveyor
· 1067mm x 35m horizontal index conveyor
· 1067mm x 41m radial stacker with 5m extendable stinger conveyor

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The crushed product stockpile is sized to accommodate a total capacity of approximately 33,000 tonnes (live capacity of approximately 6,000 tonnes). Crushed ore will be reclaimed from the stockpile by two belt feeders to a reclaim conveyor in a tunnel below the stockpile. Pebble lime (CaO) for pH control will be added to the reclaim tunnel conveyor at an average rate of 1.25 kg per tonne of ore from a 120-tonne silo equipped with a bin activator, variable speed rotary feeder, screw conveyor and dust collector. The reclaim conveyor discharges to an overland conveyor which transfers ore to the heap stacking circuit. The heap is divided into four primary stacking zones which are separated by grasshopper transfer conveyors and short overland conveyors. Transfer grasshoppers and connecting overland conveyors will be moved and operated as required based on the active heap stacking zone.

 

The heap will be constructed in 10-metre-high lifts, in cells 80 metres wide, using a mobile conveyor stacking system. The first lift will be stacked so that the toe of the heap is 10 metres from the inside toe of the perimeter berm. The effective overall slope of the heap will be approximately 2.5H:1V.

 

The heap stacking system consists of three each transfer overland conveyors (1067mm x 205m), four each grasshopper transfer conveyors (1067mm x 35m), 12 each ramp grasshopper conveyors (1067mm x 35m), 15 each standard grasshopper conveyors (1067mm x 35m), an index feed conveyor (1067mm x 18m), horizontal index conveyor (1067mm x 35m) and a radial stacker (1067mm x 41m). The transfer overland conveyors and transfer grasshoppers feed material to the grasshopper conveyors in the active stacking zone, which transfer the material to the conveyor stacking system. The conveyor stacking system includes the index feed conveyor, horizontal index, and radial stacker conveyors. The horizontal index and radial stacker are able to retreat and stack ore onto the heap. The number of grasshopper conveyors required varies depending on the area of the heap being stacked with a maximum of 27 grasshopper conveyors being required, not including the transfer grasshopper conveyors.

 

Once a lift of cells has finished leaching and is sufficiently drained, a new lift can be stacked over the top of the old lift. The old lift will be cross-ripped prior to stacking new material on top of any old heap area or access road/ramp to break up any compacted or cemented sections.

 

Stacked lifts will progress in a stair-step manner. The maximum planned heap height is 60m over the composite leach pad liner system with a design maximum height of 80m. The planned leach pad will have a total of six lifts with the maximum design of eight lifts to allow for potential future expansion.

 

17.5 Leach Pad Design

 

The final location for the leach pad and ponds was selected considering the available area within the Camino Rojo property, suitable pad foundation and the location of other project facilities. The leach pad location also allows for the development of future resources, without moving the pad. The leach pad will be a single-use, multi-lift type leach pad and has been designed with a lining system in accordance with International Cyanide Code requirements and meets or exceeds the North American standards and practices for lining systems, piping systems and process ponds to minimize the environmental risk of the facilities impacting local soils, surface water and ground water in and around the site.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The leach pad area will be constructed by clearing the pad area and stripping vegetation and growth medium. Only minor grading of the leach pad area will be required as the natural slopes are within the required range for solution drainage and stability.

 

The leach pad liner will be composed of the following lining system from top to bottom:

 

· Overliner consisting of 600mm of crushed and screened material (-19mm, + 0.43mm).
· 2mm smooth Linear Low Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) geomembrane.
· 300mm of compacted soil liner with a minimum permeability of 1x10-6 cm/sec.
· Leak detection system under the primary solution collection pipes which route solution to a monitoring sump tank.
· Prepared subgrade

 

Clay borrow sources have been identified around the Project site for use as soil liner. These borrow sources will be amended with bentonite as needed to meet the 1x10-6 cm/sec permeability requirement.

 

The first phase of the heap leach pad will be constructed in Year -1 and includes 440,000 m2 of lined area and will contain approximately two years’ worth of ore production. Phase 2 of the leach pad will be constructed in Year 2 and includes 360,000 m2 of lined area and has been sized to contain the ultimate cumulative ore capacity. A berm will be constructed during Phase 1 separating the Phase 1 area from the Phase 2 Area. The phase separation berm includes temporary sections which will be removed during Phase 2 to allow solution collection pipes for Phase 2 to connect with existing solution collection pipes from Phase 1.

 

Gravity solution collection pipes will be installed on top of the geomembrane liner and covered with overliner material. The pipes are sized to operate at 50% full to contain the design production flows from the upgradient tributary area, allowing additional capacity to accommodate excess solution from storm events.

 

The gravity solution collection pipes will consist of 100mm diameter perforated corrugated polyethylene (PCPE) tertiary pipes spaced on 8-metre centres flowing into larger double walled PCPE secondary pipes of 450mm in diameter. The secondary solution collection pipes will flow into primary solution collection pipes composed of double-walled 600mm PCPE pipe that will run along the toe of the southern and eastern heap perimeter berms. The primary solution collection pipes will exit the heap through a concrete weir to the solution collection channel. The pipes will be solid walled as they enter the solution collection channel that flows into the pregnant pond.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Should solution flows exceed the capacity of the heap outlet pipes, solution head will build at the leach pad discharge area, causing excess solution to overflow the concrete weir into the solution collection channel.

 

The overliner material will act as a protective layer that resides above the LLDPE geomembrane. The main purpose of this material is to protect the composite liner system and solution collection piping from damage during material placement

 

The leak detection system will consist of 50mm perforated Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) pipe which will be installed under the main solution collection pipes. The leak detection pipes will discharge to 200 L monitoring sump tanks outside of the heap perimeter berm. At the perimeter berm the perforated PVC pipe will transition to solid pipe and will pass through a 1000mm bentonite plug to ensure solutions are contained. The monitoring sumps will be checked daily to ensure no leaks are present. A single roll width of Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL) is installed over the leak detection trenches due to the increased solution flows at the primary solution collection piping.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-10

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 17-2 

Heap Leach Design Parameters 

 

ITEM DESIGN CRITERIA
Ore Feed Rate, tpd 18,000
Total Capacity, t  
          Planned Heap 44.0 Million
          Design Provision 75 Million
Lift Height, m 10
Quantity of Lifts  
          Planned Heap 6
          Design Provision 8
Maximum stacking height, m  
          Planned Heap 60
          Design Provision 80
Stacked Ore Density, t/m3 1.45
Front of Heap Slope, H:V 2.5
Side and Back Slopes of Heap, H:V 2.5
Setback Between Lifts, m 11.7
Angle of Repose, º 37
Leaching Cycle, d 80
Number of Leach Cycles 1
Leaching Schedule  
d/a 365
h/d 24
Tonnes Under Leach, t 1.4 Million
Active Leach Area, m2 99,300
Solution Application Method Buried Driplines or Wobbler Sprinklers
Solution Application Rate, Nominal, L/h/m2 10
Heap Irrigation Rate, Nominal, m3/h  
          Planned Heap 1,000
          Design Provision 1,379
Heap Leach Ore Moisture Retention, % of Total Ore Weight 7.8

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

17.6 Solution Application & Storage

 

The Camino Rojo Project will utilize a pregnant solution pond, barren solution tank and event solution pond for solution management. An emergency pond will also be constructed down gradient from the Merrill-Crowe facility to catch any solutions resulting from a catastrophic containment failure, such as a burst pipe.

 

Solution management for the Camino Rojo Project is fairly simple. The pregnant solution pond should be maintained in the mid-to lower range of its working capacity. The event pond should normally be maintained empty or at low levels whenever possible. It is important that the event pond be at minimum levels at the start of the wet season to ensure that it has the required capacity to contain both shorter and longer-term extreme precipitation events during the wet season. During Years 4 through the end of the Project life, water levels in the event pond should be maintained at the minimum allowable level for safe operation of the barge mounted evaporator units. Solution diverted to the event pond should be returned to the system as make-up water as soon as practical with every effort made to avoid storing excess solution over a long period of time.

 

Ore will be leached in a single stage using barren solution consisting of a dilute sodium cyanide solution. Additional residual leaching of ore will occur as leach solution from higher lifts percolates downward. Barren solution will be pumped from the barren solution tank to the active leach site using a dedicated set of vertical turbine pumps (two operating, one standby) and will be applied to the heap by a system of drip emitters. Drip emitters will be used as they generate less evaporation than sprinklers and will minimize the make-up water requirements. Wobbler Sprinklers will be used during Years 4 through the end of the Project life to help eliminate excess water from pit dewatering. Barren solution will be applied to the heap at an average rate of 10 L/h/m2. Based on metallurgical test work results, a leach cycle of 80 days has been estimated. Concentrated cyanide will be added to the barren solution tank by metering pumps to maintain the cyanide in solution at 300-500 ppm NaCN. The barren solution tank is sized for 5 minutes of residence time at the Merrill-Crowe plant design flow rate of 1,200 m3/h. Antiscalant polymer will continuously be added to the leach solutions at an average rate of 10 ppm to reduce the potential for scaling problems within the irrigation system.

 

Pregnant solution containing gold and silver values from the heap drains by gravity to a pregnant solution pond from the heap. PCPE pipes will be placed on the geomembrane liner to facilitate the collection and transport of pregnant leach solution to the pregnant pond. An emergency backup generator is included and has been sized to run the Merrill-Crowe and solution pumping systems in the event of a power outage. The emergency generator is equipped with a day tank sized to supply fuel to the engine for 12 hours at full load.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-12

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

The pregnant pond has a total volume of 94,000 m3 and has been sized based on the following criteria being contained within the pregnant pond:

 

· Working volume for 24 hours at 1379 m3/h of solution, based on potential for additional ore sources
· A 12-hour heap draindown volume of the leach solution (due to an event such as loss of power or pump) also at the solution application rate of 1379 m3/h
· Accumulation of solution resulting from a 24-hour precipitation event of 33mm over the entire lined area
· Dead storage volume assuming 1 metre of slimes at the bottom of the pond
· Freeboard of 1 metre below the top of the containment berm

 

The pregnant pond will be equipped with three submersible high flow pumps (two operating, one standby) and three horizontal centrifugal booster pumps which will pump solution to the Merrill-Crowe recovery circuit. The submersible pumps will be mounted on pump slides on the pond side walls to facilitate the placement and extraction of the pumps in the pond. An additional textured protective liner panel and conveyor belting will be installed on the pond sidewalls in the area the pump slide is located to protect the pond liner.

 

Gold and silver will be precipitated from the pregnant solution by zinc cementation in the Merrill-Crowe facility and the resulting barren solution is returned to the barren solution tank. The pregnant solution pond will be constructed using the following composite liner system from top to bottom:

 

· 2mm smooth High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) primary liner
· geonet or double sided geocomposite
· 1.5mm smooth HDPE secondary liner
· geosynthetic clay liner (GCL)

 

Leak detection pipes will be provided beneath the primary pond liner to allow for monitoring and pumping of solutions from within the leak detection sumps.

 

An event pond is included with a total volume of 313,000 m3 and has been sized based on the following criteria being contained within the event pond:

 

· A 12-hour heap draindown volume of leach solution at the design application rate of 1379 m3/h
· Accumulation of solution resulting from a 100-year, 24-h precipitation event of 130mm (113mm 100-year event plus 15%), less the 33mm of storm capacity accounted for in the pregnant pond

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-13

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

· Accumulation of solution resulting from wettest recorded monthly precipitation of 287mm
· Dead storage volume assuming 0.5m of slimes at the bottom of the pond
· Freeboard of 1m below the top of the containment berm

 

The event pond will be constructed using the following composite liner system from top to bottom:

 

· 2mm smooth HDPE primary liner
· geonet or double sided geocomposite
· 1.5mm smooth HDPE secondary liner
· geosynthetic clay liner (GCL)

 

Leak detection pipes will be provided beneath the primary pond liner to allow for monitoring and pumping of solutions from within the leak detection sumps.

 

The Event Pond will include a submersible pump mounted on a pump slide on the ponds side slope to return solution to the active leach circuit.

 

By incorporating normal working solution and drain down volumes in the Pregnant Solution Pond, it ensures that the Event Solution Pond will be used very infrequently, if at all during the first two years of operation. During typical operations, normal rainfall events can be accommodated in the Pregnant Pond as long as a significant heap drain down event does not occur at the same time. The solution storage system has been designed so that the barren solution tank overflows to the pregnant solution pond, and the pregnant solution pond overflows to the event pond in case of an emergency or significant storm event.

 

In Year 3 of operations, barge mounted evaporators will be installed in the event pond to facilitate the removal of excess solution from pit dewatering. An estimated 50 evaporator units will be installed and will evaporate solution generated from pit dewatering.

 

The emergency pond has been sized based on the following criteria being contained within the emergency pond:

 

· Working volume for 16 hours at the design application rate of 1379 m3/h of solution (in the case of a pipe burst)
· Accumulation of solution resulting from a 100-year 24-hour precipitation event of 113mm from the process facilities catchment area

 

Based on the emergency pond conditions, the capacity of the pond is approximately 36,000 m3. The emergency pond is expected to never contain any process solutions, only minor quantities of surface water from storm events.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-14

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Minimum pond storage requirements for Phases 1 and 2 are detailed Table 17-2 and Table 17-3, respectively.

 

Table 17-3
Phase 1 Process Pond Storage Requirements 

 

  Pregnant Event Total
  Pond (m3) Pond (m3) (m3)
Dead Storage 8,748 16,331 25,079
Working Solution 33,103   33,103
Heap Draindown 16,552 16,552 33,103
Storm Precipitation 15,475 51,479 66,953
Wet Season Accum.   57,939 57,939
Total Work Vol. required 65,130 125,969 191,099
Total Vol. Incl. Dead 73,878 142,300 216,178

 

Pond sizing for phase 1 is based on a 900m x 504m lined heap area with the solution accumulations described above.

 

Table 17-4
Phase 2 Process Pond Storage Requirements 

 

  Pregnant Event Total
  Pond (m3) Pond (m3) (m3)
Dead Storage 8,748 16,331 25,079
Working Solution 33,103   33,103
Heap Draindown 16,552 16,552 33,103
Storm Precipitation 35,031 108,933 143,965
Wet Season Accum.   170,738 170,738
Total Work Vol. required 84,687 296,223 380,909
Total Vol. Incl. Dead 93,435 312,554 405,989

 

Pond sizing for phase 2 is based on a 900m x 1200m lined heap area with the solution accumulations described above. This heap size includes area for potential future expansion. Ponds will be constructed for the phase 2 design requirements at the start of the Project.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-15

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

17.7 Process Water Balance

 

17.7.1 Precipitation Data

 

The Camino Rojo Project area is in a relatively dry region which makes solution management fairly simple. Due to the very limited site rainfall, precipitation event control will be based upon the volume needed to store a sudden major storm event, using the pregnant and event ponds.

 

Precipitation data has been collected from several weather stations around the Project site. Average precipitation is based on the precipitation data from the San Tiburcio weather station which is approximately four kilometres from the Project. Average precipitation by month is presented in Table 17-5.

 

Table 17-5
Average Monthly Precipitation – San Tiburcio Weather Station

 

Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun  

Average

Rainfall (mm)

13.3 10.4 6.4 17.4 37 32.9  

 

Month Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

Average

Rainfall (mm)

54.1 55 60 24.2 11.9 14 336.6

  

The 24-hr storm events based on different periods were estimated by NewFields and are presented in Table 17-6 and have been derived from the NewFields report titled “Diseño Conceptual de Manejo de Aguas Pluviales y Control de Sedimentacion, Proyecto Minero Camino Rojo, San Tiburcio, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated January, 2019 and referenced in Section 27 of this report.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-16

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 17-6
24-h Storm Event Estimations – NewFields

 

Period
(Years)
Max 24 h
(mm)
2 42.71
5 57.99
10 68.04
25 80.68
50 90.07
100 100.47
500 121.54
1000 131.41
5000 154.03
10000 164.89

 

Based on the NewFields report, the estimated 24-h storm event would be approximately 100.5mm. For the water balance analysis and pond sizing, a conservative 24-hr 100-year storm event of 113mm was used plus an additional 15% to account for climate change, making the design storm event of 130mm similar to the estimated 1000-year event.

 

Pan evaporation data for the water model are based on data from the Conception del Oro weather station and are summarized in Table 17-7. Pan evaporation was not monitored at the San Tiburcio weather station.

 

Table 17-7
Average Monthly Evaporation Data – Conception del Oro Weather Station 

 

Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun  

Average

Evap. (mm)

103.2 118.6 182.1 207.2 225.8 212.8  

 

Month Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

Average

Evap. (mm)

203.2 190.0 158.5 140.1 115.0 95.0 1928.7

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-17

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

17.7.2 Water Balance

 

Based on the preceding rainfall and pan evaporation data, active water balances were calculated based on the requirement for the full processing tonnage of 18,000 tpd. Water balance diagrams for an average year, wet year, and dry year and are presented in Figure 17-3, Figure 17-4 and Figure 17-5, respectively. For all scenarios, it was determined that the Camino Rojo Project will be in a water deficit and makeup water will be required. Makeup water requirements vary minimally between average, wet, and dry years due to the minimal overall precipitation at the Project site. Average Make-up water requirements in cubic metres per hour are summarized in Table 17-8. Pit dewatering influences on the water balance are not included.

 

Table 17-8
Average Make-up Water Requirements 

 

Description Value Comments
Crusher Dust Control 11.3 From Water Balance Diagram
Heap Leach Usage 48.2 From Water Balance "Dry Year Diagram"
Road Dust Control 15.0 Allowance
Truck Shop Wash Down 1.0 2.3 m3/h for 45 minutes, 7 times a day = ~0.4 m3/h. Assume 1 m3/h (6400 gal/day) allowance.
Camp Usage 2.6 0.25 m3/day per person, assume 250 permanent design population
Buildings    
   - Admin 0.5 allowance for bathroom / potable water
   - Plant Shop & Warehouse 0.5 allowance for misc. usage / spillage / clean-up
   - Mine Shop & Warehouse 1.0 allowance for misc. usage / spillage / clean-up
   - Laboratory 1.0 allowance for misc. usage / clean-up
   - Merrill-Crowe 5.0 allowance for misc. usage / spillage / clean-up
   - Refinery 0.5 allowance for misc. usage / spillage / clean-up
     
TOTAL Water Required 86.6 m3/h
or 24 L/s

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-18

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 17-3 Average Year Water Balance Diagram

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-19

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 17-4 Wet Year Water Balance Diagram

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-20

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 17-5 Dry Year Water Balance Diagram

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-21

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

17.8 Merrill-Crowe Recovery Plant

 

A Merrill-Crowe recovery plant is designed to recover gold and silver values from pregnant solution by zinc precipitation. The recovery plant will be constructed on a concrete containment slab located outdoors. The zinc addition and filter pre-coat circuits will be fully enclosed inside a steel building. Precipitation filtration and smelting operations will be located in a separate enclosed, secure building. The motor control centre will be housed in a separate room proximal to the recovery plant area.

 

The Merrill-Crowe recovery plant and refinery layouts are presented in Figure 17-6.

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-22

 

  

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 17-6 Merrill-Crowe Recovery Plant & Refinery Layout

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-23

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

The following major plant components are included in the Merrill-Crowe facility:

 

· Three each 280 m2 parallel pressure leaf clarification filters, (2 operating);
· Diatomaceous earth filter pre-coat and body feed systems;
· 4.6m dia. x 10m tall Deaeration tower;
· Zinc addition circuit;
· Four each 231 m2 plate and frame precipitate filter presses (3 operating, 1 standby); and
· Miscellaneous pumps.

 

The Merrill-Crowe plant will be semi-automatic with local Human Machine Interface (HMI) panels displaying unit functions and controlling primary flow streams. Non-primary or batch flow streams, such as precoating, clarifier draining, washing and cleaning, etc. will be controlled manually. All local sensors will provide a signal for monitoring from the master PLC which will control the Merrill-Crowe circuit based on level or solution flow set point for the pregnant solution pumps by controlling pump VFDs.

 

Pregnant solution at the nominal rate of 1,000 m3/h (1,200 m3/h design) will be pumped to two of the three pressure leaf type clarification filters (two operating, one on backwash/clean/precoat cycle) with a design input pressure of 517 kPag (75 psig). The clarification filters are designed to remove suspended solids down to levels of less than 1 mg/L before removal of oxygen in the deaeration tower. Diatomaceous Earth (DE) for the clarification filters will be prepared in a body feed mix tank and transferred to a pre-coat mix tank. DE from the pre-coat mix tank will be used to precoat the clarification filters. A portion of body feed solution will be metered into the pregnant feed solution to the clarification filters during operation. It is assumed that the clarification filters will require pre-coating once each day.

 

The clear pregnant solution from the clarification circuit will be sent to the deaeration tower for removal of oxygen. Clear pregnant solution then flows into the deaeration tower and passes through a bed of high surface area packing material. Liquid seal ring vacuum pumps (two operating, one standby) with a design flow of 1400 m3/h each at 24 kPa absolute provide sufficient degassing capacity to maintain oxygen levels in solution of less than 1 ppm.

 

Deaerated clarified pregnant solution then discharges from the tower and is pumped to three of four precipitate filter presses. Ultra-fine zinc will be added at the press feed pump suction to precipitate gold and silver from the deaerated pregnant solution. Lead Nitrate (PbNO3) may be mixed and metered into the zinc cone as needed to improve Merrill-Crowe efficiencies by forming cathodically charged areas of lead with negatively charged gold cyanide ions being reduced preferentially at these polarized regions. Zinc precipitation is performed at ambient temperatures. Precipitated gold and silver from the ultra-fine zinc will be collected in the precipitate filter presses which have a design operating pressure of 689 kPag (100 psig). A release coat of DE is added to the precipitate filter presses before each filter is brought online for collecting precipitated metals from solution. A portion of body feed solution will be metered into the deaerated pregnant feed solution to the precipitate filters during operation.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-24

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Solution discharging from the filter presses will be stripped of gold and silver and is termed barren solution. The barren solution will be returned to the barren solution tank, which acts as a surge tank and a head tank for miscellaneous uses of barren solution within the facility (gland water, wash down, fresh cyanide solution make-up, etc.) as well as irrigation solution for the heap.

 

17.8.1 Refinery

 

Precipitate from the Merrill-Crowe circuit will be processed in the refinery to produce a doré bar. The refinery circuit includes the following major components:

 

· A 0.28 m3 electric mercury retort;
· A 100 L Induction smelting furnace;
· A smelting furnace hood and off-gas extraction blower;
· A smelting furnace off-gas scrubber system; and
· A slag granulation and handling circuit

 

Periodically, one of the precipitate presses will be taken off-line and the empty pre-coated press will be put on line. The press taken off-line will then be put on a compressed air blow cycle to dry the filtered precipitate. After a four-hour blow dry, the press will be opened and the precipitate, with a moisture content ranging from 15 to 20 percent, drops into pans below the press. The pans will be loaded into an electric mercury retort with a fume collection system for drying and removal of mercury before being mixed with fluxes in preparation for smelting. The mercury retort will operate at temperatures up to 650 °C under vacuum. Condensers cool the retort gas stream, condensing most of the mercury which has been vaporised which is collected while the final gas stream is further cooled by aftercoolers and then pass through sulphonated carbon columns before being discharged to ensure there is no remaining mercury in the emissions stream. Recovered mercury is considered as a hazardous waste and will be transported off site for disposal.

 

The mixed precipitate and fluxes will be fed to the tilting induction furnace by a screw conveyor. The induction furnace is designed to operate at temperatures up to 1260 °C to melt the metal values present. After melting, slag will be poured off into cascading cast iron moulds until the remaining molten furnace charge is mostly molten metal (doré). Doré will be poured off into 40 kg bar moulds, cooled, cleaned, and stored in a vault pending shipment to a third-party refiner. The doré poured from the furnace will represent the final product of the processing circuit.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-25

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Slag will be processed through a granulation circuit, milled, and tabled to remove metal droplets called prills. The classified slag will then be recycled to the heap leach pad via the crushing circuit.

 

A hood will collect the furnace fumes which will pass through a series of scrubbers including a multi-cone baghouse to remove zinc oxide particles, a wet scrubbing system to remove particulates and a sulphonated carbon scrubber to remove any remaining mercury vapour. The system will be designed to remove over 98% of the particulates present in the exhaust fumes.

 

The refinery will require detailed inspections of all persons entering and leaving through the guard shack, including management personnel. Doré will be poured and loaded in an area under constant video surveillance. For added security, the security contractor will be present starting from the point where the doré is removed from the storage facility and thereafter accompany the vehicle to the airstrip or the armored truck to the main gate.

 

17.8.2 Process Reagents and Consumables

 

The reagent handling systems includes all equipment required to mix and or store reagents required for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Average estimated annual reagent and consumable consumption quantities for the process area are shown in Table 17-9.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-26

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 17-9
Projected Annual Reagents and Consumables

 

Item Form Storage Capacity Average Annual
Consumption
Sodium Cyanide SLS Cyanide mix system, ~20 tonne shipments, briquettes in 1000 kg super sacks for emergency use 10 days 2,300 tonnes
Lime (CaO) Bulk Delivery (20 tonne) 5.3 days 8,200 tonnes
Antiscalant Liquid Tote 1 m3 Bins 1 Month 175 m3
Zinc Dry Powder, 50kg canisters 1 Month 50.5 tonnes
Lead Nitrate Dry Powder, 25 kg bags 1 Month 5.1 tonnes
Diatomaceous Earth Dry Powder, 454 kg supersacks 1 Month 530 tonnes
Silica Dry Solid Sacks 1 Month 2.1 tonnes
Borax Dry Solid Sacks 1 Month 11.7 tonnes
Niter Dry Solid Sacks 1 Month 4.4 tonnes
Soda Ash Dry Solid Sacks 1 Month 8.2 tonnes

 

17.8.2.1 Lime

 

Pebble lime (CaO) will be delivered in 20-tonne pneumatic trucks. Storage will be provided in one 120-tonne silo and the estimated consumption is 1.25 kg/tonne material which will be metered onto the crushed product reclaim conveyor using a rotary feeder and screw conveyor.

 

17.8.2.2 Sodium Cyanide

 

Cyanide used for leaching and other process applications will be mixed in 18 to 20-tonne batches onsite using an SLS (Solid to Liquid) Cyanide mix system. Cyanide will be delivered in certified iso-containers in solid form. At site, process solution will be added to a 95 m3 NaCN dissolution tank and circulated through the delivery container back to the dissolution at ambient temperatures and a design pressure of 147 kPa (15m TDH). Once the cyanide is completely dissolved, the connecting hoses and pipes are cleared pneumatically to ensure there is no remaining cyanide solution in the delivery container or piping. The concentrated cyanide solution (25% NaCN by weight) is then transferred to a 95 m3 Cyanide storage tank for delivery to the process by metering pumps.

 

An extra SLS cyanide container is planned to be stored on site in the event of a delay in delivery. In the event of a significant delay in delivery, an emergency cyanide mix system will be available to mix briquettes delivered in 1,000 kg bulk bags. Emergency cyanide in bulk bags will be stored on a concrete slab with drainage controls in a secure, fenced, and completely enclosed area.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-27

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The Cyanide dissolution tank, cyanide storage tank, and emergency cyanide mix tank are all in concrete containment sized to hold 110% of the largest tank volume. The concrete containment will have appropriate water stops to ensure containment of solutions.

 

Cyanide consumption for the process is approximately 0.35 kg/tonne of ore processed.

 

The cyanide mix and storage area layout is presented in Figure 17-7.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-28

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

 

Figure 17-7 NaCN Mix & Storage Area Layout

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-29

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

17.8.2.3 Zinc

 

Ultra-fine zinc will be added to the zinc cone every shift and consumption will be approximately 150 kg/day at an assumed rate of three times the metal precipitated. An inventory of 90 canisters of 50 kg each will be stored onsite (approximately a 30-day supply).

 

17.8.2.4 Lead Nitrate

 

Lead Nitrate will be delivered in 25 kg sacks, mixed at site and metered to the zinc cone at a rate of 10% of the zinc addition rate if needed. Lead nitrate is consumed at an average rate of 15 kg/day. A 30-day supply will be stored at the Merrill-Crowe plant.

 

17.8.2.5 Diatomaceous Earth

 

Diatomaceous earth will be consumed at an average rate of 1.4 tonnes per day for pre-coating the filters in the Merrill Crowe plant. A one-month reserve supply will be kept onsite in case of supply interruptions and will be stored in an enclosed reagent storage building.

 

17.8.2.6 Antiscalant

 

Antiscalant agents will be used to prevent the build-up of scale in the process solution and heap irrigation lines. Antiscalant agent will normally be added to the process pump intakes, or directly into pipelines. Consumption varies depending on the concentration of scale-forming species in the process stream. Delivery will be in liquid form in 1 m3 (1-tonne) bulk containers.

 

Antiscalant will be added directly from the supplier bulk containers into the pregnant and barren pumping systems using variable speed, chemical-metering pumps. On average, antiscalant consumption is expected to be about 10 kilograms per 1,000 m³ (10 ppm) of process solution to be treated (pregnant and barren), or approximately 500 Litres per day.

 

17.8.2.7 Fluxes

 

Various fluxes will be used in the smelting process to remove impurities from the bullion in the form of a glass slag. The normal flux components will be a mix of silica sand, niter, borax, and sodium carbonate (soda ash). The flux mix composition is variable and will be adjusted to meet individual project smelting needs. Dry fluxes will be delivered in 25-kg or 50-kg bags. Average consumption of fluxes has been estimated at 1.75 kilograms per kg of gold and silver produced.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

17.0 Recovery Methods

Page 17-30

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

18.0 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE

 

18.1 Infrastructure

 

18.1.1 Existing Installations

 

Existing infrastructure at the Camino Rojo Project includes an exploration camp in the town of San Tiburcio capable of housing approximately 30 people and dirt and gravel roads throughout the property. Internet and limited cellular communications are currently available, though these systems will need to be expanded for operations.

 

18.1.2 Site Roads

 

Access to the Project site is by the paved four lane Mexican Highway 54 and Route 62, a secondary paved highway that passes through San Tiburcio. The Project is approximately 260 km southwest of Monterrey and 190 km northeast of Zacatecas. A private road will enter into the mine property approximately 250 metres northeast of the intersection of Highway 54 and Route 62. This road will provide access to the camps, offices, mine, process plant and other Project facilities. The entrance to the property will be located at NAD27 246493E, 2673864N, Zone 14. Site access roads will be constructed during pre-production and will include approximately 24 km of dirt and gravel roads.

 

At the existing intersection, an unpaved road and accompanying powerline continue to the town of El Berrendo, approximately 6.5 km northwest of the Project. Both the road and powerline will intersect critical mining facilities, therefore rerouting them will be necessary. The intersection will remain intact, but the road and powerline to El Berrendo will be diverted along the western boundary of the Camino Rojo property until they intersect the existing road and powerline on the north end of the property. This 7.8 km access road will be paved with asphalt and constructed within the Camino Rojo property boundary. Both the existing intersection and the mine entrance will have acceleration and deceleration lanes on both northbound and southbound directions.

 

18.1.3 Mine Haulage Road

 

The main production haul road will be finished during the construction phase to support pre-stripping and pre-production activities. There will be multiple branches off the main haul road from the pit, including access to the mine truck shop, waste rock dump and low-grade stockpile. Approximately 2.6 km of haul roads will be constructed from the top of the pit ramp to all associated haul truck destinations.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

18.1.4 Project Buildings

 

Site buildings for the Camino Rojo Project will primarily be prefabricated steel buildings or concrete masonry unit buildings. Site buildings include:

 

· Administration Building;
· Mine Camp Facilities;
· Merrill-Crowe Process Facility;
· Refinery;
· Laboratory;
· Process Maintenance Workshop;
· Reagent Storage Building;
· Mine Truck Shop;
· Contractor Mine Office Building;
· Light Duty Truck Shop;
· Fuel Stations;
· Warehouse;
· Explosives Magazine;
· Guard House; and
· Medical Clinic

 

18.1.5 Administrative Offices

 

A 600 m2 administration building will be constructed with Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) brick with stucco finish and will include permanent office space for approximately 30 employees and additional offices for temporary use. Two entrances, two emergency exits, men and women’s washrooms, a coffee area, a server room and a meeting room will also be included. This facility will include potable and fire water supply along with septic holding tanks sized for service on a weekly basis. The administration building will also include a 75 m2 room designated for training of personnel.

 

18.1.6 Mine Camp Facilities

 

The Project has an existing camp in San Tiburcio with single and multi-room layouts that can house approximately 30 people. The existing camp will be expanded on a nearby property at the beginning of construction. The expansion will include 12 modular housing units each able to accommodate four workers. Additional modular units will be installed and equipped with toilets, urinals and showers. The associated sewage treatment systems in these modular units will be able to treat the amount of waste generated.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

A significant portion of the work force is planned to be local and will be transported by bus from Conception del Oro and surrounding towns. An onsite operations camp for workers who are not local will be arranged to lodge up to 408 people and will be under maximum occupancy during the construction phase (multiple bunks in rooms that will be single rooms during operations). The camp will be located towards the northeastern portion of the property boundary.

 

There are two different types of camp accommodations: “A” camp and “B” camp units. The “A” camp unit consist of single rooms with accommodation for 6 single beds or double bunks. During construction, double bunks will be used to maximize camp capacity and will be reduced to single beds during operations. Each “A” camp building covers an area of 36 m2 (7.5 metres x 4.8 metres). The “B” camp unit consists of 4 private bedrooms with private entrances and private bathrooms per unit. Each “B” camp building covers an area of 72 m2 (9.6 metres x 7.4 metres). The total camp occupancy is summarized in Table 18-1 for both construction and operations.

 

Men and women’s privy units will be constructed and will include toilets, shower stalls, and hand washing stations sufficient for the maximum camp occupancy. A laundry building is also considered and will contain washer and dryer units for cleaning clothes and linens for the camp operations.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 18-1
Camp Capacity

 

Description Unit Qty Capacity
(Construction)
Occupancy
(Construction)
Capacity
(Operations)
Occupancy
(Operations)
Type A Dorm 32 12 384 6 192
Type B Dorm 12 2 24 2 24
Total     408   216

  

A pre-engineered steel building for cooking and dining facilities will be constructed near the camp to cater for approximately 460 workers and construction personnel. This insulated, steel walled building will include all storage areas for dry and refrigerated food, cooking equipment and serving stations for catering as well as seating and tables for personnel.

 

A pre-engineered recreation building will be constructed and includes areas for a full gym, multiple TV viewing areas, men’s and women’s wash room and areas for game tables. The recreation building is approximately 324 m2.

 

18.1.7 Merrill-Crowe Process Facility

 

Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant where gold and silver will be precipitated from deaerated pregnant solution with ultra-fine zinc. A 1,500 m2 uninsulated steel walled building with an eave height of 10 metres will contain the clarification filters, pre-coat systems and zinc feed systems for the Merrill-Crowe process facility. This building will have a rollup door, two man-doors, washroom, two offices, an atomic adsorption room for solution analysis and all other associated equipment for the Merrill-Crowe process. Liquid samples such as PLS, barren solution and other solutions from the process will be assayed using the atomic adsorption unit in the Merrill-Crowe building for gold and silver. The facility will include all necessary eyewash/safety shower water and firewater provisions.

 

18.1.8 Refinery

 

Precipitate from the Merrill-Crowe circuit will be processed in the refinery to produce doré bars. A secure, barbwire fenced, 8-metre tall CMU brick building adjacent to the Merrill-Crowe facility will house the refinery and have secure access for personnel and armored trucks. This building will house the precipitate filter presses, flux mixing system, mercury retort and smelting furnace and will include secured entry room, washroom, laundry room, mercury retort room, security office and vault. This will be a CMU brick building of approximately 650 m2. Adjacent to the refinery will be a sulphonated carbon column and wet scrubber for Merrill-Crowe and refinery exhausts.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

18.1.9 Laboratory

 

A laboratory facility will be constructed near the Merrill-Crowe plant and will process samples from the mine and process. Chemical and fire assays for full support to the operation will be provided and operated by the owner. This insulated, steel walled facility will include a wet lab, atomic adsorption and fire assay capabilities to have the capacity for 150 assays per day. Doré samples will be assayed at the onsite lab and then later by a third party at an external lab. The laboratory will include all necessary eyewash/safety shower water and firewater distribution.

 

18.1.10 Process Maintenance Workshop

 

Process equipment will be repaired and maintained in a process maintenance workshop. A three-sided, steel walled, uninsulated 330 m2 facility will be located near the Merrill-Crowe building. This will include an open shop area, men and women’s washrooms, a break room and two offices. The work shop will be equipped with air supply and distribution, welding plug sockets, wash water and firewater supply and distribution.

 

18.1.11 Reagent Storage

 

A steel walled reagent storage building will be adjacent to the Merrill-Crowe process facility and will be approximately 100 m2. This will include room for 10 pallets of diatomaceous earth, 10 super sacks of NaCN and 5 bins of antiscalant. Concrete containment will have the capacity for 110% of the largest container within the reagent storage building and includes appropriate water stops to meet the international cyanide code.

 

18.1.12 Mine Truck Shop

 

The major mining equipment consists of approximately 10 Caterpillar 773G 50-tonne trucks, two Caterpillar 6018FS hydraulic shovels, one Caterpillar 319DL excavator, three Caterpillar 992K loaders, two Caterpillar 824H wheel dozers, three D9T dozers, a Caterpillar D6 dozer, two Caterpillar 14M graders and a Caterpillar 416E backhoe. The truck shop is designed with a semi-open arrangement to include repair bays for small trucks, ancillary equipment, light vehicles, wash and welding areas.

 

An uninsulated steel-sided 600 m2 mine truck shop with three bays will be utilized for fleet maintenance. An office, lunch room, men and women’s washrooms, a storage area and firewater supply and distribution will also be included. The height of the mine truck shop will be approximately 16 metres. An attached 200 m2 wash bay will be used for washing mine equipment. Adjacent to the wash bay will be an oil skimmer to collect the oil in the wash water from the wash bay.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Crane work will be conducted within the mine truck shop with a 10-tonne overhead crane. Maintenance fluids will be distributed to each bay by the means of lubrication stations, each with a supply of compressed air, clean water, grease oils and lubricants. Fuel for the mining fleet will be handled and stored at a fuel station adjacent to the mine truck shop which will include two 100 m3 horizontal diesel storage tanks.

 

18.1.13 Light Duty Truck Shop

 

Approximately 45 vehicles and light duty pieces of equipment will require repair and maintenance. An uninsulated, three-sided steel walled shop of approximately 330 m2 will be utilized for light duty vehicles and will include one vehicle service bay, a lunchroom, a washroom and an office. The eave height of the light duty shop will be approximately 6 metres.

 

18.1.14 Fuel Storage and Dispensing

 

The main diesel storage facility will consist of one project owned 100 m3 storage tank. This facility will be complete with fuel dispensing systems and will be located near the mine truck shop. An additional fuel station with a 15 m3 storage tank will be centrally located to supply gasoline for light duty vehicles. Fuel will be delivered to the mine site via tanker trucks. All storage tanks will be placed in a 110% capacity concrete containment to assure no fuel is leaked to the environment.

 

18.1.15 Warehouse and Fenced Laydown Yard

 

A warehouse and laydown yard for storage of miscellaneous equipment, piping and supplies will be located near the entrance to the property. A 330 m2 uninsulated, steel walled warehouse will have two rollup doors and include a washroom, a break room, two offices and all required firewater supply systems. The building has an open storage area for racking shelves and bins. An attached 260 m2 fenced laydown yard will be adjacent to the warehouse. An additional 1-hectare unfenced area behind the warehouse is designated for additional laydown capacity.

 

18.1.16 Magazine Site

 

Within a two-metre high bermed and fenced area for explosives, there will be three ventilated silos and two CMU brick explosive magazines, two silos designated for ANFO storage and one silo for emulsion. The explosive storage silos will have a combined capacity of approximately 200 tonnes of explosives. Two silos of approximately 62 m3 and a third silo of approximately 33.5 m3 will be used to store ammonium nitrate and emulsion, separately. Depending on the seasonal conditions, emulsion and ammonium nitrate storage will vary from silo to silo.

 

A 550 m2 CMU brick powder magazine will be used to store accessories and low explosive products, such as ANFO, emulsion packaging, boosters and detonation cord. A smaller 60 m2 magazine will be used to store the detonators and will have a berm that separates it from the silos and the larger magazine.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Approximate distances from notable infrastructure are as follows:

 

· 800 metres northwest of the heap leach boundary
· 1000 metres west of the nearest occupied facility (primary crusher)
· 1100 metres southwest of the main haulage road
· 1200 metres west of the waste rock dump
· 1300 metres east of the El Berrendo access road

 

All of the above distances exceed the minimum safety distance requirements of the explosive regulations established by Secretaría de la Defensa Nacional (SEDENA) based on the amount of explosives to be stored in the explosives’ facilities.

 

Security of the explosives’ magazine will be conducted by strict authorization and documentation of all personnel entering the storage area for supply or removal of materials within the facility.

 

18.1.17 Guard Shack and Security

 

Access to the Camino Rojo Project will be limited to one main gate to access process and camp areas, ensuring only authorized employees, contractors and visitors are allowed onto the property or inside the critical facilities. The entrance will be manned 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for identification control, random checks, drug and alcohol monitoring and vehicle check-in/out. A security contractor will be used for general site security and protection of mine assets.

 

18.1.18 Medical Clinic

 

A 75 m2 insulated CMU brick and stucco finished medical clinic and ambulance will be present onsite, near the administrative buildings. Emergency medical staff on site include one physician, one paramedic, one nurse and one driver/rescue person. Medical treatment will be limited to the attendance of minor accidents and stabilization of patients that have received minor trauma. In the event high level medical care is needed, the ambulance is equipped and prepared for emergency transport to Saltillo or Zacatecas.

 

18.1.19 Fenced Areas

 

Approximately 6 kilometres of usable fencing around the property is already constructed. An additional 30 kilometres of fencing is required to isolate the Project and ensure safety and security. Chain-link fence and gated entry will be utilized around the explosives’ magazines and process ponds area. Chain link fencing will be constructed around fenced laydown yards, sample storage areas and the camp facilities.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

18.1.20 Airstrip

 

The Project infrastructure includes a one-kilometre by 30 metre air strip to allow for small passenger planes to land and take off at the Project site. The air strip will be constructed by grading and compacting the existing surface and is located south of the heap leach pad. The air strip does not include any infrastructure or provisions for fueling or maintenance of planes or other aircraft. The air strip will be located approximately 700 meters south of the event pond.

 

18.2 Power Supply, Communication Systems & IT

 

18.2.1 Power Supply

 

Power supply to the Camino Rojo Project will initially be generated on site using two each 2500 ekW diesel generator units with one additional generator on standby as well as by the existing power line which services the surrounding area. Power will be generated at 4160 V, 3 phase, 60 Hz and stepped up to 13.8 kV by a transformer for site distribution. The generator system has been sized to meet both the average power demand of 4.8 MW as well as the peak estimated demand of 6 MW based on detailed electrical loads with estimated utilization and demand factors. The existing power line has a reported 1 MW of capacity which will be used to supply power to dedicated loads (man camp, site buildings, water supply). The existing power line will be stepped down from 34.5 kV to 13.8 kV.

 

The general operating philosophy for the temporary site power plant will be that three of the generators will normally be running with one on standby. As loads routinely fluctuate (for example when the stacking conveyors are down for a new stacking arrangement) the generators will automatically switch to fewer generators operating as required to maintain maximum efficiency.

 

Adjacent to the generator machines there will be a central containerized switchgear with all of the synchronization, control panels, disconnects, circuit breakers, instrumentation, data logging, and 1,200 amp bus.

 

Each genset will have a fuel day tank with 15,000 L capacity and horizontal air coolers. Two each 100 m3 horizontal diesel storage tanks are also included to ensure adequate fuel supply is available to operate the generators.

 

An existing 34.5 kV powerline with concrete poles from San Tiburcio to El Berrendo accompanies the existing dirt road access to El Berrendo. This powerline and accompanying poles will be removed once new lined power is completed along the new El Berrendo access road around the Camino Rojo property. The new powerline from San Tiburcio to El Berrendo will be 34.5 kV, three phase and 60 Hz and will be constructed with concrete poles.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

It is estimated that in Year 2 of operations power supply will be available by connecting to the national commercial grid and power generation at site will no longer be needed. Overhead power lines will connect the 34.5 kV, three phase and 60 Hz power system (pending CENACE approval), to a metering and switching substation. This main substation will be located at approximately NAD27 245609E, 2674826N. Power from the main substation will be stepped down to 13.8 kV and connected to the existing switch gear for site distribution. The temporary generators and associated fuel tanks will be removed once line power is available.

 

18.2.2 Site Distribution

 

Power distribution around the process plant and facilities will be by overhead powerlines at 13.8 kV, 3 phase, 60 Hz and will be stepped down to 4,160 V, 460 V, 220 V and 110 V as required. Power will primarily be supplied at 460 V or 220/110 V to motor control centres or distribution panels in their respective areas. Power to the conveying stacking system will be supplied at 4160 V and stepped down to 460 V using on board transformers for each conveyor. All overhead distribution power lines will be connected to the main switchgear.

 

18.2.3 Estimated Electric Power Consumption

 

The estimated electrical power demand for the life of the Project is presented in Table 18-2, not including pit dewatering. Attached power for pit dewatering is estimated at 410 kW with demand varying based on pit dewatering requirements.

 

Table 18-2
Power Demand

 

  Year 1 Year 3
Area / Description Attached Power (kW) Average Demand (kW) Attached Power (kW) Average Demand (kW)
Area 110 - General 410 231 410 231
Area 113 - Crushing 2189 1286 2189 1286
Area 115 - Heap Leach Stacking 2268 1361 2554 1480
Area 120 - Heap Leach Pad & Ponds 1141 810 1141 810
Area 128 - Merrill-Crowe 460 322 460 322
Area 131 - Refining 365 149 365 149
Area 134 - Reagents 42 24 42 24
Area 360 - Power 10 6 10 6
Area 362 - Water Supply & Distribution 399 161.2 641 266
Area 365 - Laboratory 470 264 470 264
Total 7,759 4,617 8,333 4,902

Note: Minor Difference in Totals Due to Rounding

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

18.2.4 Emergency Power

 

In the event of a power failure or power interruption, diesel-fired backup generators will be used to supply emergency power for project safety and security. Backup electric power will be supplied to the following facilities:

 

· Critical process equipment
· Mine Camp
· Raw Water Pumping System

 

In order to maintain critical solution balances in the solution handling systems during power outages, a 2,000 kW generator is required for the Pond/Merrill Crowe area for the critical pumps. This emergency generator will be located next to the Merrill Crowe recovery plant. A fuel tank will be provided for the generator to maintain a 24-hr fuel supply. The fuel storage system will also include a concrete containment area sized for 110% of the capacity of the tank(s).

 

Emergency power for the mine camp and raw water pumping systems will be by small local generators located at the facilities.

 

18.2.5 Communications

 

Communications systems required to support mining, processing and general administration activities will require multiple transmission modes for fail-safe redundancy. Internal communications will be by radio frequency. External communications will be through a mix of landline, cellular and VOIP. Primary communications and any required equipment will be located within the server room in the administration building.

 

18.3 Water

 

18.3.1 Water Supply

 

Camino Rojo will require water for the following uses:

 

· Construction activities
· Dust control for mining and crushing activities
· Makeup water for the heap leach
· Process plant and laboratory activities
· Man camp and administration uses
· Fire water

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-10

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Total project water supply will be sourced from production wells located within the property boundary. Total water consumption for the Project will average 24 L/s with a peak water demand of 33 L/s.

 

A production well designated CRPW-01 has been drilled approximately 2.7 km from the raw water tank. A seven-day pump test of PW-1 concluded that the well could produce at 24 L/s, without significant draw down and potentially up to 32 L/s. This is enough to supply water for operations in a normal year. Work is currently in progress to locate an additional production well to supplement water production at PW-1.

 

Water demand from production wells will decrease once the water table is reached in the pit. Inflow of groundwater to the pit is expected to exceed water demands for process and mine operations. Eventually, excess pit water will need to be evaporated by implementing additional dust suppression as well as installing evaporators in the event pond.

 

The design basis for water supply for the average case are presented in Section 17.

 

18.3.2 Potable and Domestic Water

 

Potable water will be treated by a reverse osmosis water treatment system from the raw water tank and stored in an HDPE or lined storage tank to ensure that the water remains acceptable for domestic uses. Water will then be distributed by pumps to the camp and other facilities.

 

18.3.3 Fire Water and Protection

 

Throughout the property, hydrants and sprinkler systems will be installed at appropriate locations. The fire water supply will be a designated portion of the raw water tank located near the camp facilities. The fire water pumps will be a pair of 100% duty pumps, one electrically driven and the other diesel driven, which automatically comes into operation when the electrical driven pump is either being maintained or there is a power failure. To ensure a constant pressure in the main, an electrically driven jockey pump will also be utilized.

 

The entire system will be automated and provided with signals and alarms to communicate with the main control room. Fire alarm detection systems will be provided for all process areas, camp, warehouses, offices, workshops and electrical/control rooms. The fire detection system will consist of addressable intelligent automatic detectors, manual alarm stations and alarm bells within each facility tied to a central monitoring panel or to a local fire alarm panel with remote reporting to the central monitoring panel in the security office.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

An underground network of HDPE pipe will feed fire hydrants located in proximity to all facilities and processing areas. Fire hose stations will be installed in the mine workshop, process plant workshop and in proximity to all major process areas.

 

18.3.4 Surface Water Management

 

Water runoff from upstream of developed property will be diverted around the mine operations and allowed to return to natural drainage locations on the southern boundary of the property. The details of this water diversion channel are outlined in the NewFields’ report “Diseño Conceptual de Manejo de Aguas Pluviales y Control de Sedimentación”. An emergency pond will collect water runoff from areas near the process facility through a series of diversion ditches. Ditches around ponds, stockpiles, buildings and roads will collect water runoff from developed portions of the property which will be conveyed to the channel detailed in the NewFields’ report which is referenced in Section 27 of this report.

 

18.4 Sewage

 

A sewage treatment plant of 40 m3/day capacity will be constructed early in the construction phase next to the operations camp. This plant will handle the sewage from all camp rooms, kitchens and laundry rooms. Sludge volume generated in the treatment plant will be collected and utilized for compost production to be sent to the growth media stockpiles while the treated water will be utilized for dust suppression.

 

Waste from the septic systems of the process area, administrative buildings and laboratory will be collected in septic holding tanks and removed from the site by sanitary services. Septic tanks designated for the administration and contractor office buildings will be 20 m3 and all other associated tanks will be 10 m3 all of which will be serviced on a weekly basis.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

18.0 Project Infrastructure

Page 18-12

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

19.0 MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS

 

No market studies were completed and no contracts are in place in support of this Technical Report. Gold and silver production can generally be sold to any of a number of financial institutions or refining houses and therefore no market studies are required.

 

It is assumed that the doré produced at Camino Rojo will be of a specification comparable with other gold and silver producers and as such, acceptable to all refineries.

 

Gold and silver produced by the Camino Rojo Project would be sold to refineries or other financial institutions and the settlement price would be based on the then-current spot price for gold and silver on public markets. There would be no direct marketing of the metal. The base case financial model for the Camino Rojo Project utilizes a gold price of US$1,250/oz and a silver price of US$17/oz.

 

The FS assumes that mining operations will be conducted by contractors working under the supervision of the chief mining engineer. The required contracts are:

 

· A general mining contractor,
· A blasting agent/high explosives manufacturer that will also be responsible for delivering the blasting products to the site, loading the blast holes and detonating the blasts,
· A specialty drilling contractor to drill small diameter holes for pre-splitting final pit walls and drilling holes for slope reinforcement if the general mining contractor cannot perform these tasks.

 

Quotations for these services have been received and were used to estimate costs for the Feasibility Study, but no contracts are currently in place.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

19.0 Market Studies and Contracts

Page 19-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT

 

20.1 Environmental Studies

 

Some baseline environmental studies were completed by previous operators of the Project. In April 2018, Orla commissioned independent consultants to conduct more complete baseline environmental studies over the Project area. The studies required to support permitting were completed in May 2019. Periodic sampling of some parameters such as groundwater and air quality is ongoing.

 

20.1.1 Project Area Description

 

The description of the Camino Rojo Environmental System (Sistema Ambiental) presented in this report has been summarized from the Technical Justification Study for Change of Land Use (ETJ, Estudio Tecnico Justificativo para Cambio de Uso de Suelo) prepared for submission to the Federal environmental permitting authority SEMARNAT.

 

20.1.1.1 Climate

 

The climate is typical of the high altitude Mesa Central, dry and semi-arid. Temperatures commonly range from +30° to 12 °C in the summer and 24° to -6° C in the winter. The median annual temperature is 17.1 °C. The average annual precipitation of 337mm falls mostly during the rainy season in July, August, and September. The average annual evaporation is approximately 1,900mm. Wind speeds are variable with maximum wind speeds of 130 to 160 kph during extreme events. Average wind speed is 5 kph.

 

20.1.1.2 Soils

 

Soils are dominantly calcisols (soils with high carbonate component) and leptosols (shallow soil over carbonate rock). These soils are not very suitable for agriculture.

 

20.1.1.3 Hydrology

 

The Project is located in Hydrologic Administrative Region III, North Central Basins, in Hydrologic Region Number 37 El Salado, within the RH37C Sierra de Rodriguez Basin, within sub basin RH37Ca San Tiburico and micro-basin 37-158-04-007 San Tiburcio, characterized by open dendritic drainages.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

 

June, 2019

 

 

20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
Social or Community Impact

Page 20-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.1.4 Physiography

 

The Project is located in the Mesa Central physiographic province, dominated by gently sloping valley floor lowlands in basins separated by low hills and/or moderate relief mountains.

 

20.1.1.5 Seismicity

 

The site is in Seismic Zone A, nil to very low seismic activity: It is characterized by zero reported historic seismic events and expected temblor-caused soil accelerations of no more than 10% of the acceleration of gravity

 

20.1.1.6 Vegetation

 

The vegetation is dominantly creosote bush and tar bush, with cacti, maguey, sage and coarse grasses with rare yucca, and is classified as matorral desértico micrófilo (small leaved and/or thorny desert scrub less than 4m high) which covers >95% of the Project area, and matorral desiertico rosetofilo (desert scrub less than 4m high with rosette shaped leaves) which covers <5% of the Project area).

 

Five flora species with legally protected status are present: biznaga (beehive cactus - Coryphantha delicata); biznaga burra (giant barrel cactus - Echinocactus platyacanthus); biznaga barril de lima (Mexican fire barrel cactus - Ferocactus pilosus); biznaga bola uncinada (Chihuahuan fishhook cactus - Glandulicactus uncinatus ssp. Uncinatus); and amole cenizo (Manfreda potosina).

 

In addition to the protected species, the independent biologists contracted to conduct the flora survey recommended that eleven flora species be considered of biological interest and included in a flora rescue/protection plan.

 

In accordance with Federal laws and permit conditions, 100% of protected plants will be rescued and transplanted prior to construction. The planned program of flora rescue and transplant anticipates the collection and transplantation of 3,801 plants of protected species. Additionally, 10% of the plants of biological interest will be rescued and transplanted prior to construction. The total number of plants of biological interest to be rescued and transplanted is estimated at 8,502. A nursery will be constructed on site to safely store rescued plants prior to their re-planting, and native vegetation seeds will be collected and germinated in the nursery to provide plant stock for post-closure reclamation plantings.

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

 

June, 2019

 

 

20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
Social or Community Impact

Page 20-2

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.1.7 Fauna

 

Seventy-eight vertebrate species were identified in the Project area, 57 bird species, 9 mammals, 8 reptiles, and 4 amphibians. Nine species identified in the Project area are listed as threatened or protected species, and thus require special consideration: sapo verde (North American green toad - Anaxyrus debilis); cascabel de diamantes (Western diamondback rattlesnake - Crotalus atrox); vibora de cascabel gris (rock rattlesnake - Crotalus Lepidus); víbora de cascabel cola negra (black tailed rattlesnake - Crotalus molossus); chirrionerra (coachwhip snake - Masticophis flagellum); culebra sorda Mexicana (Mexican bull snake – Pituophis deppei); lagartija espinosa de mezquite (mesquite lizard - Sceloporus grammicus); zorra norteña (kit fox - Vulpes macrotis); and the aguililla rojinegra (Harris hawk - Parabuteo unicinctus harrisi).

 

In accordance with Federal laws and permit conditions, prior to construction qualified biologists will survey areas to be disturbed to identify nesting areas, dens, and lairs of animals present. Any animals not naturally prone to leave the area that are found will then be relocated to suitable habitats elsewhere in the property area.

 

20.1.2 Environmental Management Plans

 

A key objective is to design and build the Project in such a way that it does not cause significant adverse effects during construction, operation, closure and post-closure. To aid this objective, a number of Environmental Management Plans will be developed. An outline of some of the key plans is given in this section. These plans will need to be developed further before construction begins. They will also need to be reviewed and revised during the life of the Project.

 

Costs for environmental monitoring, management plans and environmental protection measures are included in the FS.

 

20.1.2.1 Surface Water Management

 

Surface waters in the Project area are exclusively ephemeral streams with water flow only during storm events, and small retaining ponds built along the drainages as sources of water for livestock and agriculture. As part of Project environmental baseline studies, water from retention ponds was sampled. Sampling of surface waters draining the Project area will be continued through the life of the mine, including reclamation period and post-closure until it has been determined that reclamation has been successful in preventing long-term effects on surface waters.

 

Water diversion structures will be constructed to keep surface water from flowing into the heap leach pad, mine pits, waste dumps and other operational areas. Surface drainage from disturbed areas which have no potential to produce chemical or metal contamination will be directed into small ponds to allow sediments to settle out before discharging to the environment.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Independent consultants have completed a detailed investigation of Acid Rock Drainage (ARD) and metal leaching potential. Over 80% of the mineralized and unmineralized material that would be moved or processed under the plans described in the Feasibility Study are categorized as Non-Acid Generating, the remaining material is categorized as Potentially Acid Generating. The waste rock storage facility and the heap leach pad are expected to be net neutralizing. A full report of the ARD study by HydroGeoLogica is referenced in Section 27 of this report. A preliminary waste rock management plan has been developed by HydroGeoLogica and includes encapsulating potential acid forming materials in the centre of the waste rock storage facility to limit the possible generation or release of ARD as described in Section 16.6.

 

20.1.2.2 Ground Water Management

 

Groundwater in the area of the proposed pit and waste rock storage facility (WRSF) is present at approximately 110 metres (m) below ground surface (bgs), indicating a significant unsaturated zone is present underneath the WRSF. Groundwater in the vicinity of the WRSF, based on water quality samples collected from long-term pumping test of well CR-01 in January 2019, has a near neutral pH, but high total dissolved solids (TDS) in the range of 5,000 to 6,000 mg/L, as well as elevated concentrations of other constituents. However, there may also be a perched zone of ground water below part of the heap leach pad (HLP) at a depth of approximately 12 to 27m bgs; the extent of this perched zone (vertical and horizontal distribution) is still being evaluated.

 

Groundwater is not currently used as water supply in the vicinity of the Project and the groundwater quality precludes its use for drinking water as concentrations of several constituents are above drinking water standards. Additionally, water from CR-01 had an arsenic concentration of 0.27 mg/L in one of the January 2019 samples, greater than standards applicable to the Project (average monthly discharge standards for agriculture presented in NOM-001-SEMARNAT-1996).

 

Groundwater quality degradation could potentially come from the heap leach pad and associated ponds (if the liners leak) and from the waste rock dump. Therefore, monitoring wells will be constructed down-gradient of the heap leach pad, mine and waste rock dumps. A systematic sampling program will be developed to ensure any effects the operation has on groundwater are detected and appropriate changes to the operation can be made to negate these effects.

 

Hydrologic models of the proposed mine area indicate that post closure, the mined pit would become a pit lake with evaporation exceeding inflows, thus the pit would become a hydrologic sink relative to lateral groundwater flow and groundwater in the vicinity of the pit would flow towards the pit, thus minimizing the potential for affecting groundwater quality outside of the immediate mine area. Depending on vertical head gradients and permeabilities, there is a possibility that groundwater in the pit lake could flow downward into underlying units.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.2.3 Air Quality Management

 

The primary potential effect on air quality will be because of dust. Costs for watering the road and for dust control in the crushing circuit have been included in this Report. The Company has an ongoing air quality monitoring program in local communities. An air quality monitoring program will be initiated to ensure worker health and the environment are not adversely affected by air quality.

 

20.1.2.4 Wildlife Management

 

All protected species of fauna will be rescued and relocated to suitable habitats prior to commencement of operations. All operational areas will be fenced to keep animals out. A no hunting policy will be enforced amongst workers. Waterfowl are not common in the area. However, if required, a system to keep birds from landing in the operational ponds will be devised.

 

20.1.2.5 Cyanide Management Plan

 

Orla will develop a cyanide management plan which will include measures to prevent interaction of wildlife with heap leach solutions. All lining and containment systems will be designed to meet International Cyanide Code requirements and will be constructed according to North American standards.

 

20.1.3 Waste Handling

 

20.1.3.1 Hazardous Wastes

 

Special wastes such as waste oil, glycol coolant, solvent fluids, used oil filters, used batteries, and contaminated fuel, will be handled, stored, transported, and disposed of in accordance with appropriate Hazardous Waste Regulations. A certified transport and disposal company will collect all waste to transport offsite for final disposal.

 

The fenced temporary storage facility for hazardous waste will be approximately 1,375 m2. Approximate 7.5 m2 of steel roofed storage area will be designated for used batteries and 50 m2 of storage for used lubricants, coolant and other miscellaneous fluids. Approximately 730 m2 within the fenced area is designated for used tires. This area is sized for a year of replaced haul truck tire storage stacked one tire high, providing additional storage if tires are stacked in multiples.

 

20.1.3.2 Non-hazardous Wastes

 

A site for temporary storage of recyclable materials will be established at the laydown Area. Such items as scrap metal, tires, glass, recyclable plastics and drink containers will be separated, containerized as appropriate, and temporarily stored in the lay down area until sufficient volumes are available for shipment to a recycling point. Non-recyclable and non-hazardous waste will be buried in an on-site fenced landfill of approximately 12,000 m2. The landfill will have the capacity for approximately 15,000 m3 or 4,500 tonnes worth of waste material based on a compaction of 300 kg/m3, the minimum landfill compaction outlined in NOM 083.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.3.3 Putrescible (Domestic) Waste Disposal

 

Non-hazardous putrescible organic food wastes generated from the camp accommodation facilities will be composted and used as an organic enrichment to stockpiled soil, or if not suitable for composting, will be buried in the landfill site along with other inert non-recyclable materials.

 

20.1.3.4 Boneyard Storage

 

A location on the mine site will be designated as an outdoor storage or ‘boneyard’ area for placement of items that are not yet ready for disposal, but which may still be of use for spare parts. These items are likely to include equipment parts, vehicles, and pieces of equipment, and metal components. As much of this material as possible, will be utilized during the mine life. Materials remaining in the boneyard at the end of mine life will either be shipped off site for salvage value, recycled, or disposed of in the landfill if they meet the criteria for disposal at that location.

 

20.1.3.5 On-site BioRemediation Cell

 

“Land farming” is a commonly used method of soil remediation for hydrocarbon contaminated soil that relies on natural breakdown of hydrocarbons by microbial action. This is done by spreading a shallow layer of contaminated soil onto a lined "bermed" area referred to as a biocell. In the event of a minor hydrocarbon spill on site, the contaminated materials will be treated using a biocell as authorized in the Hazardous Waste Regulation.

 

20.1.3.6 Waste Water (Sewage) Disposal

 

The wastewater disposal systems for the camp and office areas will be engineered, constructed, and maintained under the direction of a qualified professional and will comprise separate septic systems for the office and housing facilities as described in Section 18.0.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.4 Reclamation

 

Reclamation will be undertaken during mining activities where possible, but the majority of work will occur after the completion of mining and final gold recovery. The reclamation land use objective will be to return the land to its traditional use as a grazing area for goats and wildlife habitat. Closure objectives include securing the site to assure physical safety of people, protecting wildlife, protecting surface and groundwater quality and quantity, minimizing erosion and controlling fugitive dust. To accomplish these objectives, the following key elements will be included in the reclamation plan:

 

1. Chemical stabilization, accomplished through rinsing of the heap leach pad solutions, encapsulation of potentially acid generating rock in the waste rock storage facility and development of a pit lake;
2. Physical stabilization, accomplished through slope grooming, and the application of topsoil and revegetation;
3. Control of surface waters; and
4. Monitoring effluent chemistry from the pad and water draining the mine waste and pit areas.

 

Closure will be accomplished in three stages:

 

1. Concurrent: measures implemented during the operating life of the Project;
2. Final: measures implemented after cessation of operations; and,
3. Post-closure: provides for short-term maintenance and long-term monitoring of the closed facilities.

 

An outline of the key components of the closure and reclamation plan is given in this section. Further detailing of these components will be required before construction commences. During operation, the closure and reclamation plan will be revised further.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.4.1 Soil Handling

 

All topsoil harvested during construction will be stockpiled for future use. However, the site is expected to be deficient of organic matter and other soils to support revegetation. Therefore, during operations topsoil will be created. This will be done by combining compostable materials with suitable native soils and natural topsoil. The produced topsoil will be stockpiled for future use; this process must start early since green wastes require time to compost before they are suitable to use as soil amendments.

 

Possible sources for organic matter include:

 

· Chipped wood, bark and brush from site clearing activities (from the entire site including the mine and waste dumps), beginning with the initial site clearing and including subsequent phases of expansion of the heap, waste dumps and open pits;
· Composted organic fractions from solid wastes (especially food wastes) from the camp and canteen; and,
· Composted sewage sludge from the on-site disposal systems (ideally composted with the solid waste organic fraction).

 

20.1.4.2 Camp

 

All camp buildings will be removed upon completion of the operation and the area graded and seeded.

 

20.1.4.3 Central Operating Area

 

Prior to reclamation, all hazardous material will be removed from site. All equipment and building in the central operating area, including the office and warehouse, mine truck shop, Merrill-Crowe plant, generators and fuel handling facility will be dismantled and removed, and the area graded and seeded.

 

20.1.4.4 Mine Pits

 

Closure of the pit will include restricting access to the pit and allowing the pit to naturally fill with groundwater to form a pit lake. In order to prevent the inflow of natural water runoff, the catchment berm preventing upstream flow into the pit will be retained after closure.

 

Hydrogeologic and geochemical modeling to predict pit filling and pit lake water levels and pit lake chemistry during the post-closure period was performed by HydroGeoLogica and is presented in the report titled “Camino Rojo Pit Lake Evaluation”. The pit lake is expected to fill to a steady-state elevation within 30 to 40 years. The steady-state pit lake is predicted to be approximately 100m deep with a lake surface 110m below the rim; discharge to surface water will not occur. The pit lake water balance indicates that the pit will function as a hydraulic sink in the base case scenario and most sensitivity scenarios evaluated. For a high groundwater inflow scenario, the pit lake water balance predicts a downward outflow from the pit lake, though the pit lake seepage flow rate to groundwater is low, limiting potential effects to groundwater. The pit lake chemistry is expected to initially have a near-neutral to alkaline pH and a total dissolved solids concentration (TDS) that is elevated, but similar to that of groundwater (approximately 5000 mg/L). The pit lake is predicted to remain alkaline in the post closure period as potentially acid generating materials in the pit walls will largely be submerged. As the pit lake is expected to function as a hydraulic sink, overconcentration of the pit lake water will occur with time and the TDS concentrations will increase throughout the post closure period. Concentrations of arsenic and cadmium are predicted to eventually be elevated.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Water inflow and quality in the pit and surrounding areas will be monitored for 10 years after the notice to SEMARNAT of restoration compliance.

 

Finally, the pit will be enclosed by a perimeter fence in order to restrict the access of individuals and wildlife in the area.

 

20.1.4.5 Waste Rock Storage Facility (Mine Waste Dumps)

 

The WRSF and associated roads will be reclaimed post mining. Mine roads and waste dumps will be re-sloped, with slopes re-contoured to 2.5:1 horizontal to vertical grade, have topsoil added, and be re-seeded.

 

Short and longer term monitoring of slope stabilities will be provided until deemed stable.

 

Sulphide oxidation is a potential issue for all mineral deposits containing sulphides that are exposed to air and water through the process of mining. Sulphide oxidation produces acidity that can result in acid rock drainage (ARD) if there is an absence of sufficient neutralization potential and if there is sufficient flushing to mobilize this acidity. However, if sufficient neutralizing minerals, specifically carbonate minerals such as calcite, are present and available, then acidic conditions may not occur even in the presence of sulphide oxidation.

 

Geochemical characterization and modeling studies completed by HydroGeoLogica Inc. demonstrate that the Camino Rojo deposit has abundant neutralization potential throughout the deposit, with an average content of approximately 140 tCaCO3/kt for all material types. Additionally, the post-mineral and the oxide zones of the deposit have limited to no sulphide minerals, though the transition and sulphide zones of the deposits have low sulphide mineral contents, primarily as pyrite, with average contents of approximately 1 wt% and 3 wt%, for the transition and sulphide materials, respectively. These average sulphide contents correspond to acid generation potentials (AGPs) of approximately 30 to 100 tCaCO3/kt, respectively, less than the average neutralizing potential.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Based on the overall average ABA characteristics of the waste rock, HydroGeoLogica determined that the waste rock storage facility is expected to be net neutralizing. Using the neutralization potentials and sulphide mineral contents above, and tonnages of the respective materials in the waste rock dump, there is more than five times the required neutralization potential to maintain overall neutral conditions, or an equivalent overall neutralization potential ratio of 5 (NPR, defined as neutralization potential over acid generation potential). Per Mexican regulations, NPR values greater than 3 are classified as non-acid generating.

 

A waste rock characterization and handling plan was developed by HydroGeoLogica, independent consultants to Orla, (reference Hydrogeologic report), key components of which are:

 

· Minimum 5-metre thick base of oxide/post-mineral. This practise will: a) prevent direct infiltration of seepage from transition and sulphide materials to the vadose zone and groundwater, b) prevent surface water and/or groundwater moving along the waste rock-ground surface contact to interact with transition and sulphide materials, and c) provide a layer of material with excess neutralization potential at the base of the WRSF, which will provide attenuation capacity for any acidic seepage generated within the WRSF.
· Final surface of 3-m layer of post-mineral/oxide material. This will prevent long-term exposure of transition and sulphide materials and limit development of potential localized zones of acidic conditions.

 

Given that the current Project mine plan does not include mining appreciable tonnages of post-mineral or oxide materials in the final two years of the mine plan, the WRSF is designed such that post-mineral and oxide materials may be easily pushed or placed over the transition and sulphide materials upon completion of mining.

 

Additional components of the waste rock management in anticipation of closure and reclamation include: a water shedding design, including grading and sloping of lifts, benches and top surfaces, to limit infiltration and prevent ponding, and water management structures to divert non-contact water around the waste rock storage facility. Runoff from the waste rock storage facility will be contained in retention or sediment control basins, as appropriate.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-10

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.4.6 Roads

 

During reclamation, steep slopes on roads will be stabilized and any culverts removed. Drainage bars will be constructed to keep water from flowing down the road bed. Except for the access road, surfaces will be scarified and seeded.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 20-1 Camino Rojo Project Closure Schedule

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-12

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.5 Closure Activities – Heap Leach Facilities

 

The following activities will be completed during the operating life of the Project, beginning in year 3 of operations and continuing until the cessation of operations:

 

20.1.5.1 Chemistry

 

Analysis of results from geochemical and metallurgical laboratory testing to investigate heap neutralization and long-term chemical and physical stability of the heap leach has been completed by KCA and HydroGeoLogica Inc., and the results of these studies are herein summarized.

 

The HLP will contain oxide ore and transitional ore (TrH and TrL); as such, development of acid rock drainage (ARD) in the HLP during operations or the post-closure period is not expected. The environmental geochemical behaviour of the oxide and transitional materials for the deposit has been evaluated by several geochemical characterization programs, as summarized by HGL (2019a). The oxide materials are non-acid forming, with low sulphide content and abundant acid neutralization potential (NP). The transitional materials are also considered overall non-acid forming due to their abundant NP. However, the transitional materials have variable sulphide mineral content due to the variability of oxidation in the deposit, resulting in a potential acid-forming classification for approximately 30% of the transitional samples (HGL 2019a) based on Mexican standards.

 

The sulphide mineral content of the ore is important from a metallurgical standpoint because it affects cyanide leaching, and from an environmental standpoint, because it determines the environmental behaviour with respect to ARD potential (HGL 2019a). The predicted annual average total sulphur content of the ore, based on assay data and the block model, was included in the mine schedule IMC (2019). Given that the majority of the ore is oxide, the overall sulphur content is relatively low at 0.47 wt.%. In contrast, the average neutralization potential for the oxide and transitional ore samples as presented in HGL (2019a) was 72 tonnes of calcium carbonate per kiloton (tCaCO3/kt), ranging from 19 to 163 tCaCO3/kt.

 

The resulting net neutralization potential (NNP, defined as the NP minus the AGP from sulphur content as pyrite), considering respective tonnages of oxide and transitional ores, is positive, with an excess of 2.5 million tCaCO3, due to the relatively elevated ANP of all materials and the abundance of low-sulphur oxide materials.

 

Mexican regulations (NOM-157-SEMARNAT-2009) use the neutralization potential ratio (NPR; ANP/AGP) for classification of waste materials, with NPR values less than 3 designated as potentially acid forming. Weighted annual average NPR values were calculated for the overall ore. The NPR values are greater than 3 except for the final two years of mining when the ore is mostly transitional ore; however, this only represents approximately 15% of the overall ore based on the mine plan. Using the bulk ANP and AGP for the HLP, the overall HLP is classified as non-acid forming with an NPR of 5.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-13

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The metals leaching behaviour of the oxide and transitional leached ore from an environmental standpoint was evaluated by rinsing column tests completed as a part of metallurgical testing and through the synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP). The metallurgical column test rinsing included chemical analysis of rinse leachates over time from free-draining columns containing approximately 200-kilogram (kg) samples. Six of the columns were rinsed by drip irrigation with water or with a detoxified barren solution with the equivalent of 5 to 8 pore volumes of rinse solution.

 

Concentrations of metals and cyanide decreased with rinsing, and by pore volumes 5 to 8, concentrations of all metals and cyanide, with the exception of arsenic, were below standards applicable to the site as presented in NOM-001-SEMARNAT-1996 (metals limits for discharge for agricultural use) and NOM-155-SEMARNAT-2007 (cyanide limits for heap leach mining).

 

Arsenic concentrations were also elevated in the SPLP tests (though not relative to the standard applicable to the tests, NOM-157-SEMARNAT-2009, for determination of hazardous materials), as well as in one of the humidity cell tests on the oxide waste rock (HGL 2019a). The combination of these results imply that the source of the arsenic is not due to cyanide leaching, but rather weathering of the oxide and transitional ore. Given this, the elevated concentrations of arsenic observed in the rinsing are expected to persist long term in the post-closure period. Consistent with this evaluation, arsenic is also elevated in the natural groundwater based on sample testing of well CR-01 in the pit area (Section 20.1.2.2). Designs and procedures developed to ensure the elevated arsenic does not result in environmental degradation are given in the following sections.

 

20.1.5.2 Permanent Surface Water Diversion Works

 

As the leach pad expands the lower portions of the surface water diversion systems will be in their final locations, and then they will be upgraded to meet permanent standards for erosion and storm size appropriate for the post-closure period to limit maintenance. This will also apply to the outlet structures and any associated erosion works.

 

20.1.5.3 Permanent Slope Stabilization

 

Once heap slopes are in their permanent configuration and leaching has ceased, final grooming, capping and revegetation of these slopes, along with associated surface water and erosion controls, will be implemented.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-14

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.5.4 Final Engineering and Monitoring Plans

 

The plans developed during concurrent closure will require final revisions to accommodate both lessons learned and the final configuration of the heap and roads. This will also include final as-built surveys of the facilities.

 

20.1.5.5 Heap Rinsing, Neutralization and Solution Management of HLP Seepage

 

The heap rinsing process consists primarily of recirculating cleaner water through the heap. Initially the recirculated solutions will be process solutions, diluted by normal rainfall, with pH buffered to normal leaching levels to allow complete extraction of gold, silver and other metals. Individual areas of the heap, simulating approximately the normal leach areas, will be rinsed so that the capacity of the drainage system and plant are properly utilized. Once the target levels for the controlled constituents (pH, metals and CN) are reached, the heap will be allowed to sit idle through at least one wet season and the effluent chemistry monitored to ensure the targets are maintained. If any of the constituents exceed the targets, then rinsing will be repeated.

 

Following rinsing, the HLP may be regraded as needed and a cover will be placed on the HLP to reduce infiltration and subsequent seepage that may require management. The HLP will initially have a high moisture content from residual rinsing and leaching solutions. During initial drain down of these solutions, flows will be similar to that of operations, but will decrease rapidly as the coarser zones are drained. Following the bulk of draindown, seepage rates will approach those of a long-term, steady-state seepage. Long-term seepage rates will be governed by precipitation, evaporation and the cover system.

 

Geochemical testing of residual samples from column leach tests indicate that leached material is not prone to acid production and the potential for metal leaching is generally low. Long-term seepage chemistry is expected to be is expected to be similar to that of the final rinses from the metallurgical columns, near-neutral to alkaline with low concentrations of metals with the exception of arsenic. The long-term seepage is expected to be low with the use of a cover, less than 0.1 L/s, but will likely persist in perpetuity and may be sporadic. The long-term seepage can be managed using the operational solution collection system and directed to an evaporation pond constructed by the conversion of the operational ponds, eliminating the need for discharge.

 

In the first years of operation detailed closure and monitoring plans will be developed considering the as-built facilities and the projected as-stacked heap. These plans will be of sufficient detail to allow the start of concurrent closure activities as well as planning for final closure.

 

Laboratory and field data will be collected on an ongoing basis to support geochemical and heap neutralization modeling and to allow accurate prediction of both the neutralization process and effluent chemistry following closure. Laboratory testing may include leach columns and kinetic testing to simulate long-term geochemistry. Field testing may include testing either pilot heaps or cells created inside the commercial heap to verify the laboratory data. Geochemical modeling will allow predictive modeling of effluent quality from the closed heap.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-15

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.5.6 Heap Slope Grooming and Slope Stabilization

 

After the heaps have been rinsed and neutralized, the slopes will be graded to a smoothed contour with 2.5:1 horizontal to vertical grade, with appropriate grading to promote proper drainage and to accommodate the cover. In some cases where slope stability has been an issue during operations, some flattening of the slopes may be required as part of final closure. The required final slopes will be determined based on testing and analysis. Some areas may be graded to allow creation of permanent access roads or other features. The lower portions of the entire perimeter of the heap will be graded so that all exposed liner is covered but such that the liner will still capture draindown and seepage solutions for short term and long-term water management.

 

20.1.5.7 Cover, Topsoil Placement and Revegetation of Heap and Surrounding Areas

 

The heap, as well as any disturbed ground in the vicinity (except roads and diversions to remain) will be covered with an evapotranspiration cover of native soil, growth media (topsoil), supplemental nutrients as needed, and then seeded. The cover will provide for protection of surface water runoff quality, limit infiltration into the HLP, reducing post-closure water management requirements, and promote vegetation growth. For high-erosion prone areas some rapid growing, annual species of exotics may be used but the revegetation plan will emphasize the use of locally harvested native species. Experience has shown that locally harvested seeds have the highest survival rates and are the best suited to local soil and climate factors. Over the heap non-food species will be preferred to avoid accumulation of any metals in the food chain. The cost estimate includes harvesting and purchasing seed and purchasing fertilizer annually for the first three years; afterwards the maturing vegetation will generate sufficient seed and organic mass to support robust growth.

 

20.1.5.8 Ponds and Pump Stations

 

The solution and emergency ponds and pump stations will remain in place and in service for the first few years after operations cease to allow management of heap effluents. Upon determination they are no longer necessary, they will be removed.

 

20.1.5.9 Physical and Mobile Equipment

 

Except for a handful of light mobile equipment (truck, backhoe, bulldozer), no equipment form mining activities will remain on-site. Most of the removed equipment will be in serviceable condition and thus will probably be sold at a profit (i.e., sales proceeds exceed decommissioning costs). Equipment not saleable as functioning equipment will be recycled, sold for scrap, or suitably disposed of.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-16

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.1.5.10 Roads, Diversion Works and Erosion Controls

 

Roads and diversion works that are to remain in service post-closure will be upgraded to meet the closure design. Generally, this will mean that the surfacing will be more robust and that the dimensions of drainage facilities will be enlarged to meet a larger design storm. Culverts will be replaced with surface crossings since culverts are only serviceable for 10-20 years.

 

20.1.5.11 Fencing

 

All fencing around the pad and pond areas will be removed as the land is intended to return to grazing and wildlife habitat. Permanent fences will remain around the pit and the evaporation pond.

 

Fencing will be removed to allow for grazing wildlife habitat. However, fencing will be maintained around the pit to prevent access to the pit and around evaporation ponds near the HLP.

 

20.1.6 Post Closure Activities

 

20.1.6.1 Physical Monitoring and Maintenance

 

After the completion of final closure, the site will require regular maintenance for the first approximately 10 years post-closure or until there is no further signs of changing conditions. During this period, the site will be inspected every calendar quarter (3 months) and maintenance activities will be planned immediately following each wet season and following any unseasonal major storm events. The purpose of this is to ensure the drainage and erosion control measures are working as planned, and to allow the recently revegetated areas to mature and properly take hold. Maintenance work will consist of light manual labour (ditch tending, rubble removal, and so forth), and light equipment (backhoe and bulldozer) work to regrade or groom any areas showing signs of distress or erosion.

 

Once the site stops showing signs of seasonal distress and the functionality of the facilities has been field proofed, and when the geochemical performance matches predictive modeling, periodic inspection and maintenance activities can be reduced in frequency; initially to annually and eventually to only after unusually high rainfall periods.

 

20.1.6.2 Geochemical Monitoring and Maintenance

 

The quality of the water draining from the heap will require monitoring and comparison to the predicted chemistry and discharge standards. If the measured water quality significantly varies from that predicted, in an unfavourable manner, then the geochemical model will be revised and new forecasts prepared. In the extreme case additional rinsing and neutralization of the heap may be required. More likely it will only be required to extend the short-term maintenance period.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-17

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

During the initial, short-term draindown period, the ponds will remain in service for water management. Water collected in the ponds will be tested with each inspection cycle and if the water quality does not meet discharge standards then that water will be recirculated to the heap and/or evaporated. No discharge of solutions are expected. The ponds will likely accumulate sediments and precipitates as water accumulates and evaporates. These sediments will require periodic removal and can be buried within the heap. This will probably continue for at least one-year post-closure and may be needed for up to five years, depending upon the effectiveness of the erosion control measures and re-vegetation efforts.

 

In the long term, the ponds will be used for evaporation of HLP seepage as described in Section 20.1.6.4 for surplus water management. No discharge of solutions are expected. Sediments and evaporative precipitates will accumulate and require periodic removal and disposal on the HLP.

 

20.1.6.3 Biological Monitoring and Maintenance

 

Maintaining a healthy, robust biological system will improve both the physical and geochemical performance of the closed heap. Thus, the periodic inspections will pay special attention to the biological environment, the health of the vegetated areas as well as the health of the down-stream habitats and surrounding vegetative areas. Reseeding will be planned annually for the first approximately 3 years, or as needed. Biological monitoring will continue as long as physical monitoring does, and at least until all habitat and vegetative areas have been stable for multiple years and through extreme wet and dry seasons

 

20.1.6.4 Surplus Water Management

 

During draindown periods when the water cannot be effectively evaporated in an evaporation pond, solutions will be pumped on top of the heap as irrigation water for the revegetated areas and evaporated on top of the HLP. Alternatively, draindown solutions may be pumped to the developing pit lake if water quality is adequate and is not predicted to affect the pit lake water quality. Costs for this program will principally be pump maintenance and provision of electrical power (i.e., diesel fuel) from the generating station.

 

If the geochemistry of the heap effluent supports closing the ponds, then they will be decommissioned and closed at such time. The liners will be perforated and the ponds backfilled with permeable waste rock or rinsed leached material.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-18

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

If the long-term HLP seepage does not meet standards, the seepage will be managed by evaporation ponds, constructed by converting the HLP solution management ponds to evaporation ponds. Initial draindown modeling by HydroGeoLogica indicates, with a cover, the long-term seepage rate is expected to be low enough for effective management by evaporation over the long term.

 

20.1.7 Closure Cost Estimates – Heap Leach Facilities

 

Costs for concurrent reclamation and closure, including G&A, have been estimated at US$0.65 per tonne of ore processed, or approximately US$29.9 million over the life of the Project (including US$8.8 million for G&A costs during closure). These costs are in addition to any reclamation and closure costs considered in the normal operating and sustaining cost estimates.

 

Costs for concurrent reclamation are considered to begin during Year 6 of production and continue throughout the life of the mine, including a three-year closure period.

 

Estimated closure costs by year are presented in Table 20-1 below, not including G&A:

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-19

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 20-1
Summary of Camino Rojo Closure Costs

 

Description Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Total
Closure Plan (Regulatory Approval) $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Topsoil/Revegetation of Preg/Excess Pond (Haulage/Placement) $0 $0 $0 $76,000 $25,000 $101,000
Topsoil/Revegetation of Waste Dump $334,000 $37,000 $0 $0 $0 $371,000
Topsoil/Revegetation of Heap Leach Pad $0 $0 $0 $143,000 $143,000 $287,000
Regrade of Heap Leach Pad $0 $0 $0 $217,000 $217,000 $434,000
Leach Pad Waste Cover $0 $0 $0 $574,000 $574,000 $1,148,000
Water Control Infrastructure $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000
Pregnant Pond Partial Fill $0 $0 $0 $102,000 $0 $102,000
Excess Pond Partial Fill $0 $0 $0 $251,000 $84,000 $335,000
Pond Drainage Revision $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Demolish/Removal Mine Infrastructure and Camp $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Building Slabs (Bury In-Place or to Heap/Ponds) $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $50,000
Crushers / MC plant $0 $352,000 $0 $220,000 $0 $572,000
Remediation of disturbed areas $0 $0 $54,000 $27,000 $9,000 $89,000
Remediation of hydrocarbon affected areas $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $0 $12,000
Hazardous Waste Removal $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
Remediation of Chemical Affected Areas $0 $0 $0 $59,000 $20,000 $79,000
Reclaim Tunnel Closure $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Access Road Closure to Restricted Areas $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,000 $66,000
Removal of Haul Road $0 $0 $0 $0 $508,000 $508,000
Monitoring of Mine for 10 years $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Labor $121,000 $241,000 $1,207,000 $483,000 $362,000 $2,414,000
Heap Rinsing & Neutralization $0 $1,464,000 $4,881,000 $2,441,000 $976,000 $9,763,000
Support Services $0 $98,000 $196,000 $98,000 $98,000 $489,000
Contingency (15%) $83,000 $336,000 $962,000 $711,000 $492,000 $2,584,000
             
Total (Excluding G&A) $638,000 $2,579,000 $7,375,000 $5,448,000 $3,774,000 $19,813,000

 

20.2 Permitting

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by SEMARNAT, which has authority over the two principal Federal permits:

 

i. A MIA, accompanied by an ER; and
ii. A CUS, supported by an ETJ.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-20

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Thus far exploration work at Camino Rojo has been conducted under the auspices of two separate MIA permits and corresponding CUS permits. These permits allow for extensive exploration drilling but are not sufficient for mine construction or operation.

 

In April 2018, Orla hired independent environmental permitting consultants to design and implement baseline environmental studies of the Camino Rojo Project, and to work with Orla’s consultant engineers to collect the data required for obtaining a Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement) and Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Use Change) permit, and to prepare the documents needed to solicit and obtain the MIA and CUS permits necessary for mine construction and operation. Submission of MIA and CUS permitting documents to SEMARNAT is anticipated in the 3rd Quarter 2019.

 

The Project is not located in an area with a special Federal environmental protection designation and no factors have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required Federal and State environmental permits. The legislated timelines for review of properly prepared MIA and Change of Land Use applications and mine operating permits for a project that does not affect Federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves are 120 calendar days and 105 working days, respectively, which can be completed concurrently.

 

The Peñasquito mine, a large scale, open pit mine, presently operated by Newmont, is in the same Municipality and the mine encountered no impediments to receipt of needed permits. Should construction and operation permits be solicited for the Camino Rojo Project, no obstacles to obtaining them are anticipated provided that Orla design and mitigation criteria meet all applicable standards.

 

Table 20-2 summarizes the Federal, State, and Municipal permits required for mine construction, and Table 20-3 for mine operation and closure. Figure 20-2 summarizes the permitting flow chart.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-21

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 20-2
Permits Required for Mine Construction

 

Mining Stage Required formality Agency Response time (Aprox.) Comments

CONSTRUCTION

 

OPTION 1 Environmental Impact Manifest (MIA) SEMARNAT 3-6 months Baseline studies should be conducted to support the MIA.  A comprehensive environmental manifest  shall be prepared and submitted to SEMARNAT for evalutation and authorization.
Land Use Change Study (ETJ) SEMARNAT 2-3 months A detailed forestry inventory and a technical study shall be prepared and submitted to SEMARNAT for evaluation and authorization.
Risk Analysis Study (ER) SEMARNAT 3-6 months A risk analysis shall be prepared and submitted and will be evaluated together with the MIA, when high risk substances such as cyanide is used in the process.
OPTION 2 Documento Técnico Unificado (DTU) SEMARNAT 3-6 months A comprehensive technical document that integrates information of the MIA, ER and ETJ should be prepared and submited to SEMARNAT for evaluation and authorization.
Land Use/construction Licence Municipality 1 month An application letter shall be submitted to the municipal authorities to obtain the authoriztion letter.
Permit for disposal of non-hazardous residues Municipality 1 month An application letter needs to be submitted to the municipal authorities, specifying the expected type and amount of non-hazardous waste from the mine construction and operation.
Explosive handling SEDENA, Municipality  and State Government of Sonora 3 months An application letter shall be submitted to SEDENA.  Also an endorsement letter shall be obtained from the State Government and the Municipality.  
Archeological clearance INAH 1 to 8 months A request letter should be submitted to INAH.  A survey will be done by INAH personnel and if there is some archeological interest a rescue and documenting program will be performed.
Water use concessions CONAGUA 3 months An application should be submitted to CONAGUA requesting a water use concession,  specifying the volume of water to use per year.  If the aquifer has no availabiltiy, water rights need to be purchased.  The volume of water to be used in the mining activities should be measured and paid.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-22

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 20-3
Permits Required for Mine Operation and Closure

 

Mining Stage Required formality Agency Response time (Aprox.) Comments
OPERATION Water discharge permit CONAGUA 3 months An application needs to be filed before CONAGUA with estimated annual volume and the quality of the  discharge.  This may include the sannitary service water discharge or any other water discharge to septic tanks or natural environment.
Operation licence SEMARNAT 2 to 4 months Needs to do an inventory of all air emissions, water discharges and solid wastes.
Accident prevention plan SEMARNAT None Based on the risk analysis, it is necessary to establish a plan and procedures to prevent and respond to emergencies and accidental events.  SEMARNAT will register this plan.
Mining residues managament plan SEMARNAT None Need to prepare this plan according to NOM-157-SEMARNAT-2009.  SEMARNAT will register this plan
Hazardous waste generator registry SEMARNAT None It is required to keep records of any hazardous waste movement at the mine facilities and deliveries to an authorized external company.
ABANDONMENT Closure and reclamation plan SEMARNAT Not specified

Need to submit a comprehensive closure and reclamation plan, as early as possible before the closure of the mine. 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-23

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 20-2 Permitting Process Flowsheet

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-24

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.3 Social and Community Impact

 

20.3.1 Background

 

The Project has a long association with the local communities, including Community and Social Responsibility Agreements as described in Section 4.3 of this report. Minera Camino Rojo has a fulltime community and social relations department working on site in San Tiburcio, and has enjoyed a pacific and mutually beneficial relationship with the local communities.

 

In April 2018, Orla commissioned ERM, a global provider of environmental, health, safety, risk, social consulting services and sustainability related services, to conduct an independent assessment of social and community impacts of development of the Camino Rojo Project, and to provide guidance on actions and policies needed to ensure that Orla obtains and maintains social licence to operate. The study was completed in May 2019 (ERM, 2019) and salient results are being incorporated into the project development and permitting plans. Key points are summarized as follows:

 

Principal concerns of affected stakeholders in surrounding communities are:

i. Employment of community members
ii. Community benefits from improved public services and investment in community development
iii. Environmental contamination
iv. Increased community population and strain on public services
v. Water shortages

 

Principal concerns of Ejido members whose land is affected are:

i. Just economic compensation
ii. Assistance in obtaining title to informally owned parcels

 

Principal concerns of local and State government authorities are:

i. Generation of employment
ii. Improvement of local infrastructure
iii. Service contracts to local businesses
iv. Environmental contamination

 

ERM identified the principal social and community impacts of the Project and concluded that the Project does not put at risk the social environment of the nearby communities because the impacts can be mitigated or made positive with the implementation of a Social Management System (SMS). ERM has designed a SMS based on International Association of Impact Assessment best practices.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-25

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Population, demographic, and local infrastructure information presented in Sections 20.3.1 through 20.3.4 are derived from Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI - National Institute of Statistics and Geography) and a social and community impact report prepared by ERM de Mexico SA de CV (ERM, 2019).

 

20.3.2 Population and Demographics

 

20.3.2.1 Indigenous Communities

 

According to census data from the Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas (CDI – National Commission for the Development of Indigenous Communities) the localities are not categorized as indigenous localities. ERM’s field visit corroborated that there is no indigenous presence in the CAI.

 

20.3.2.2 Inhabitants, Age and Gender

 

ERM defined the Core Area of Influence (CAI) of the Project and a broader Area of Direct Influence (ADI) of the Project according to IAIA and International Finance Commission criteria. The communities nearest to the Project, San Tiburcio, San Francisco de los Quijano, and El Berrendo have a combined population estimated at 1,209 persons. An additional 2,072 persons live in the communities that comprise the broader area of direct influence. Population by community is summarized in Table 20-4.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-26

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 20-4
Populations of Communities in Area of Influence of Project

 

Area of Influence
Category
Locality Population,
INEGI Data,
2010 Census
Population,
2018 Camino
Rojo Census
Core Area of Influence (CAI) El Berrendo 149 152
Core Area of Influence (CAI) San Francisco de los Quijano 45 52
Core Area of Influence (CAI) San Tiburcio 548 1005
       
  Total 742 1209
       
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) Banderita Dos 118 N/A
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) El Calabazal 36 N/A
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) Tanque de los Hacheros (Hacheros) 90 N/A
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) Majoma 334 N/A
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) La Pardita 207 N/A
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) Pozo de San Juan 225 N/A
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) Presa del Junco 245 N/A
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) Cardona (Rancho Nuevo) 294 N/A
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) Salto de San Juan 130 N/A
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) San Benito (El Salitrillo) 21 N/A
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) San Elías da la Cardona 214 N/A
Area of Direct Influence (ADI) Tanquecillos 158 N/A
       
  Total 2072  

 

According to the 2010 INEGI census, in all three localities of the CAI area, the male population presented a slight majority, however the 2018 census by Minera Camino Rojo showed that the communities of El Berrendo and San Tiburcio had slight female majorities.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-27

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The 12 localities that comprise the ADI all have a greater proportion of men than of women in a range of 50% to 57.4%, with the exception of El Calabazal, where 63.9% of its inhabitants are men and 36.1% are women. As a consequence, the proportion of women is below the state average of 51.2%.

 

In El Berrendo and San Tiburcio, the largest age group comprising approximately 60% is the population 15 to 64 years of age, which INEGI defines as the working age population, followed by the population between 0 to 14 years of age (~30%) and the age group 65 years old or older that represents approximately 10% of the population. The only town that presents a different distribution is San Francisco de los Quijano, where the second largest age group is the population over 65 years of age equivalent to 31.1% of the population and 8.9% of the population ranging from 0 to 14 years.

 

The majority age group is the population between 15 and 64 years old, followed by the group between 0 and 14 years and finally, the over 64 years old population. In all communities of the ADI the trend repeats itself.

 

20.3.2.3 Education

 

San Tiburcio has a kindergarten, primary school, secondary school, and preparatory (high) school.

 

The illiteracy rate in the three localities of the CAI is greater than the percentage at the state level (4%) however there are significant differences. In El Berrendo and San Tiburcio between 7% and 6% of the population aged 15 and over is illiterate. In San Francisco de los Quijano, almost a quarter of the population is illiterate (22%).

 

The percentage of the population greater than 15 years old that has completed a primary school education varies significantly depending on the locality. In San Francisco de los Quijano the percentage of the population that has completed primary education is 44%, in San Tiburcio it is 14%, and in El Berrendo it is 11%.

 

In El Berrendo, 21% of the population aged 15 or older has completed high school, a percentage higher than the State average of 16%. In comparison with the locality of El Berrendo, both the localities of San Francisco de los Quijano as San Tiburcio, show lower percentages of completion of secondary education, 11% and 16% respectively.

 

At the state level, the average level of education completed is 7.9 years. In general, the Zacatecasn population finished primary school, but not secondary school. In the case of localities of the CAI, the best average educated level is in San Tiburcio which has an average of 7.05 years of schooling, followed by El Berrendo with 6.33 and San Francisco de los Quijano with 3.51.

 

Similar to the educational data for the CAI, the population of the ADI likewise has relatively low educational level compared to State averages.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-28

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.3.3 Infrastructure and Public Services

 

The locality in the CAI that has the best provision of public services, surpassing even the state average, is San Tiburcio. There, 91% of homes have electricity, in contrast to the state average which is 73%. In addition, 89% of homes have access to piped water, 87.5% have a toilet and 74% have drainage in their homes. In the case of El Berrendo and San Francisco de los Quijano, access to public services is lower. Both locations have similar percentages of houses with sanitary drainage (60% and 59% respectively), homes with a toilet (67% and 77% respectively), and homes with access to the electricity network (72% and 77% respectively). The biggest difference is the percentage of homes with access to piped water. In El Berrendo 72% of the houses have piped water, while in San Francisco de los Quijano only 5% of homes have access to water.

 

El Berrendo has a water purification plant that represents the only significant economic and commercial activity for the community beyond very small-scale agriculture. The water treatment plant attracts people from other nearby localities that obtain their drinking water from this government subsidized plant.

 

The town with greatest access to public services is Salto de San Juan, there at least 80% of the houses have piped water, drainage, toilet and electricity. On the other extreme is El Calabazal, where 100% of its homes lack drinking water and drainage. In addition, in 5 of the 12 localities that make up the ADI no houses with access to drinking water were identified. Except for Salto de San Juan, the percentage of homes with drainage is below the state average.

 

Access to media and communications is dominated by television in the three localities of the CAI. In both El Berrendo and in San Tiburcio, over 90% of homes have television (93.6% and 93.6% respectively) while San Francisco de los Quijano, 76.5% of the housing has television. Radio is available in 58.1% of homes in El Berrendo, 70.6% in San Francisco Los Quijano and 48.8% in San Tiburcio. All three locations are below the state average of 82.2%. San Tiburcio is the locality where more houses have a computer (23.2%), even above the state average of 22.5%. In El Berrendo and San Francisco de los Quijano, the percentage of homes with a computer is minimal. All three communities have minimal access (San Tiburcio) or no internet access (El Berrendo and San Francisco de los Quijano).

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and
  Social or Community Impact
June, 2019 Page 20-29

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

All communities in the ADI have access to television and radio. However, only in San Benito (El Salitrillo) the percentage of dwellings that have television is higher than the state average. In the case of radio, El Calabazal has the highest number of houses with radios. None of the 12 locations have access to the internet while access to computers and cell phones is limited. In 8 of 12 localities the percentage of homes with computers does not exceed 10% and half of the locations do not have cell phones. As in the CAI, television is the main means of communication to which the inhabitants they have access. The internet and the computer are the mediums with the least coverage.

 

Health services are insufficient in the CAI. At the state level, 68% of the population has rights to public health services, 35% is affiliated with Popular Insurance, 25% is entitled to the Mexican Insurance Institute Social Security (IMSS) and 7% to the Institute of Security and Social Services of State Workers (ISSSTE). The community within the CAI with the highest percentage of population with access rights to medical service is San Francisco de los Quijano with 98%, followed by El Berrendo with 74% and San Tiburcio with 49%. Both in San Francisco de los Quijano and in San Tiburcio, the population with access to medical services is affiliated with IMSS, while, in El Berrendo, 48% is affiliated with the Seguro Popula.

 

ERM’s field surveys indicate that the health services in the three communities of the CAI are insufficient. Both the inhabitants of El Berrendo and those of San Francisco de los Quijano, (including those from the La Fábrica neighbourhood) attend the San Tiburcio health centre (Figure 20-3). The current clinic does not cover the needs of the population. There are State and Municipal plans to construct a new medical clinic in San Tiburcio. Local residents communicated that when services are not available in San Tiburcio, patients must travel to Concepción del Oro.

 

 

 

Figure 20-3 Medical Clinic in San Tiburcio – ERM 2018.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

 

June, 2019

20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and

Social or Community Impact

Page 20-30

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

In the ADI, in 8 of the 12 communities the percentage of the population with rights to medical care exceeds the state average (68%). The best served communities are Presa del Junco and Salto de San Juan where 94% of the population has access to public health services. In contrast, the localities with the lowest percentage of population with access to medical services are: San Benito (El Salitrillo), where less than half of its population has access (43%), Majoma, with 26% and La Pardita where 94% of its population is not a beneficiary of either of IMSS, ISSSTE, nor Popular Insurance coverage. The medical service that has the highest percentage of affiliates in the ADI is IMSS, followed by ISSSTE and Popular Insurance.

 

20.3.4 Government and Community

 

All communities in the CAI are part of the Municipality of Mazapil, governed by an elected Mayor (Presidente Municipal). As discussed in Section 4.3 of this report, three Ejidos, self-governing agricultural cooperatives, are part of the CAI and while subject to governance of the Municipality, the Ejidos have rights over the use of Ejidal lands.

 

ERM conducted field surveys of the three localities that comprise the CAI. In all three localities, the predominance of houses were built with concrete block and vault ceilings (Figure 20-4), however, some houses built with sheet or cardboard were also observed. Most houses have a water tank, since the water service is insufficient. Particularly in the town of San Francisco de los Quijano, many dwellings were observed uninhabited and abandoned (Figure 20-5). Many dwellings in the CAI have chicken coops, solar panels, orchards, and other self-sustainable features. The Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food (SAGARPA) implemented both in El Berrendo and in San Francisco de los Quijano and San Tiburcio, a program called "Strategic Project of Food Security" (PESA) with the objective of supporting family food production in rural localities of high and very high marginalization. Based on the information collected through focus groups, it was found that particularly in El Berrendo there is a very positive perception about the PESA program.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

 

June, 2019

20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and

Social or Community Impact

Page 20-31

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 20-4 Home in El Berrendo – ERM 2018

 

 

 

Figure 20-5 Unoccupied Home in San Francisco de los Quijano – ERM 2018.

 

Public space infrastructure is scarce. San Tiburcio is the community with the most significant public spaces, including a town square with a kiosk, public lighting, benches and fencing (Figure 20-5). The neighbourhood of La Fábrica, although it is part of the ejido de San Tiburcio, has less infrastructure in its public spaces (Figure 20-6). All three communities of the CAI have ejidal community buildings, which are commonly used for meetings of the Ejidal Comisariado. The ejido community room of El Berrendo was funded by Goldcorp and is in good condition.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

 

June, 2019

20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and

Social or Community Impact

Page 20-32

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 20-6 Town Plaza in San Tiburcio – ERM 2018.

 

 

 

Figure 20-7 Public Plaza in La Fabrica (part of San Tiburcio) – ERM 2018.

 

20.3.5 Economic Activity, Income, Marginalization

 

The main economic activities in the area are agriculture and livestock, although a large part of the production of these sectors is used for self-consumption. The mining industry in the area, a tortillería, the Mahoma solar energy park 40km south of the Project area, and small businesses and restaurants in San Tiburcio and along Federal Highway 54 are the main sources of employment in the CAI. Minera Camino Rojo and its subcontractors are a significant local employer, with approximately 40 local community members employed.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

 

June, 2019

20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and

Social or Community Impact

Page 20-33

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO - National Population Council) has developed metrics to quantify the marginalization of communities in Mexico. The degree of marginalization is a summary measurement allowing differentiation of communities according to the impact of the deficiencies that the population suffers as a result of the lack of access to education, lack of adequate housing, and lack of goods and services. Marginalization is also expressed in the unequal distribution of progress and exclusion of various social groups. CONAPO has determined that two of the three communities in the CAI, El Berrendo and San Francisco de los Quijano, have a high degree of marginalization, while San Tiburcio has a moderate degree of marginalization. (Table 20-5)

 

Table 20-5
Marginalization by Community

 

Community Marginalization Index
(CONAPO, 2010)
Degree of
Marginalization
El Berrendo -0.789659188 High
San Francisco de los Quijano -0.148593057 High
San Tiburcio -1.047676631 Medium

 

The Consejo Nacional de Evaluacion de la Politica de Desarrollo Social (CONEVAL – National Council for Evaluation of Social Development Policy) for 2010, in the municipality of Mazapil, of which the CAI communities are part of and which has a total population of 18,603, determined that 67.8% of the inhabitants of the municipality lived in poverty (12,247 inhabitants). 5.5% of the population (999 people) was considered economically vulnerable due to low income, while 73.4% (13,246 inhabitants) had income below the level required for basic well-being, of which 6,357 inhabitants (35.2% of total population) had income below the level required for minimum well-being.

 

The Economically Active Population (EAP) in a community is defined as the total population 15 years and older who have a job or who, not having work, are looking for work. At the state level, 35.5% is in the EAP. In San Francisco de los Quijano 42.2% is within that category, followed by the towns of San Tiburcio and El Berrendo with 33.4% and 32.2% respectively. The inactive population refers to pensioners or retired people, students, people dedicated to the home, or people who have some permanent physical or mental limitation that prevents them from working. In the CAI, all communities have percentages of inactive population above the state percentage of 38.6%. The town that has the highest percentage of non-economically active population is San Francisco de los Quijano with 48.9%, followed by the town of El Berrendo with 47.7% and finally, San Tiburcio with a 40.5%. The employed population corresponds to those over 15 years of age who practise some activity in the production of goods and services, which is remunerated. Of the localities of the CAI only one, San Francisco de los Quijano, is above the Zacatecas state average (33.7%) with 42.4%. Both El Berrendo (32.3%) and San Tiburcio (32.5%) are slightly below the state average. The willfully inactive population refers to people over 15 years of age who by choice do not participate in paid productive activities, for example, students, housewives, pensioners, retirees, etc. This category is exceeded by all others in all three communities in the CAI.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

 

June, 2019

20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and

Social or Community Impact

Page 20-34

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

20.3.6 Social Management System and Mitigation of Negative Impacts

 

The social and community impact study completed by ERM identified 19 significant concerns and impacts of the Project to the local communities and stakeholders. Each impact or concern is categorized as potentially positive (P), potentially negative (N), or neutral and are as follows:

 

i. Economic development (P)
ii. Creation of technical capabilities in communities (P)
iii. Economic displacement due to land use and road diversion (N)
iv. Increase in the payment of taxes at Municipal, State and Federal level by the Project (P)
v. Restoration of site after closure (neutral)
vi. Social investment in the communities (P)
vii. Induced migration (N)
viii. Property damage (N)
ix. Increase in the cost of living (N)
x. Construction of new infrastructure that benefits community (P)
xi. Pressure on public services from Project employees (N)
xii. Re-routing of roads (neutral)
xiii. Damage to roads (N)
xiv. Traffic issues due to increased Project related traffic (N)
xv. Landscape changes (N)
xvi. Noise and dust generation (N)
xvii. Environmental contamination and degradation of natural resources (N)
xviii. Accidents and emergencies (N)
xix. Occupational injuries and diseases (N)

 

The impacts incurred during the exploration and development stage are generally positive, and the potentially negative impacts will be mitigated. The concern of economic displacement due to land use and road diversion will be mitigated through implementation of a development plan that ensures the correct compensation (economic or in-kind services, or a mixture) of the persons correctly identified as affected, such a plan includes investments in projects that improve the quality of life of the people of the ADI. Such a strategy is already in place as part of Orla’s Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreements with the local Ejidal communities.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

 

June, 2019

20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and

Social or Community Impact

Page 20-35

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Significant impacts during the construction phase can be reduced through mitigation measures, including community consultations and agreements on the criteria used to on decide on the deviation of traditional roads, and development of strategic alliances with Government entities to mitigate the impact of demand on public infrastructure and services by project workers. Environmental and social monitoring systems will be implemented to monitor noise and dust levels to ensure that they do not exceed the levels established by the Mexican regulations.

 

The environmental impacts during the operation and production stage will be mitigated through implementation of the operation and closure plans described in this report, particularly those designed to minimize the long-term impact to the local environment. During the closure and remediation stage the Project will enact the mitigation measures included in the environmental studies and permitting reports prepared for the Project, and such measures will meet Mexican regulations and meet or exceed industry best practices. The company will communicate these measures in an efficient and transparent manner.

 

ERM concluded that the Project does not put at risk the social environment of the neighbouring communities, given that social impacts and risks can be prevented, mitigated or if positive, expanded, through the implementation of a Social Management System (SGS). The SGS for the Project was designed based on the best practices and guidelines of the International Association for Social Impact Assessment (IAIA) and is supported by Orla’s Corporate Social Responsibility Policy and Environment & Sustainability, Health & Safety Policy. Orla plans to develop the Camino Rojo Project in accordance with International Finance Corporation Performance Standards, as well as the International Council on Mining and Metals principles.

 

When MCR has submitted construction and operation permit applications, SEMARNAT will require a bond, insurance or guarantee, for the estimated cost of reclamation required by law. The amount will be determined based on a technical study of the required reclamation, and bonding is required in stages, proportional to the pending reclamation work created by Project development.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

 

June, 2019

20.0 Environmental Studies, Permitting and

Social or Community Impact

Page 20-36

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

21.0 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS

 

Capital and operating costs for the process and general and administration components of the Camino Rojo Project were estimated by KCA. Costs for the mining components were provided by IMC. The estimated costs are considered to have an accuracy of +/-15% and are discussed in greater detail in this Section.

 

The total Life of Mine (LOM) capital cost for the Project is US$153.7 million, including US$10.1 million in working capital and not including reclamation and closure costs which are estimated at US$19.8 million, IVA (value added tax) or other taxes; all IVA is applied to all capital costs at 16% and is assumed to be fully refundable. Table 21-1 presents the capital requirements for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Table 21-1
Capital Cost Summary

 

Description Cost (US$)
Pre-Production Capital $123,114,000
Working Capital & Initial Fills $10,187,000
Sustaining Capital – Mine & Process $20,424,000
Total excluding IVA $153,725,000

 

The average life of mine operating cost for the Project is US$8.43 per tonne of ore processed. Table 21-2 presents the LOM operating cost requirements for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Table 21-2
LOM Operating Cost Summary

 

Description LOM Cost
(US$/t)
Mine $3.30
Process & Support Services $3.38
Site G & A $1.75
Total $8.43

 

IVA is not included in the operating costs.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

21.1 Capital Expenditures

 

The required capital cost estimates have been based on the design outlined in this report. The scope of these costs includes all expenditures for process facilities, infrastructure, construction indirect costs, mine contactor mobilization and owner mining capital costs for the Project.

 

The costs presented have primarily been estimated by KCA with input from IMC on owner mining and mining contractor mobilization costs. Material take-offs for earthworks, concrete and major piping have been estimated by KCA. All equipment and material requirements are based on design information described in previous sections of this Report. Capital costs estimates have been made primarily using budgetary supplier quotes for all major and most minor equipment as well as contractor quotes for major construction contracts. Multiple quotes were received for all major packages (three or more in most cases). Where Project specific quotes were not available a reasonable estimate or allowance was made based on recent quotes in KCA/IMC’s files. In total, more than 90% of the Project direct costs are based on supplier and contractor quotes.

 

All capital cost estimates are based on the purchase of equipment quoted new from the manufacturer or estimated to be fabricated new.

 

The total pre-production capital cost estimate for the Camino Rojo Project is estimated at US$133.3 million, including all process equipment and infrastructure, construction indirect costs, mine contractor mobilization and working capital. All costs are presented in first quarter 2019 US dollars. Where prices were quoted in Mexican Pesos and an exchange rate of 19.3 MXN:1 US$ was used.

 

Pre-production capital costs required for the Camino Rojo Project by area are presented in Table 21-3.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-3
Summary of Pre-Production Capital Costs by Area

 

Plant Totals Direct Costs Total Supply
Cost
Install Grand Total
  US$ US$ US$
Area 110 - General $12,406,000 $3,059,000 $15,466,000
Area 113 - Crushing $11,202,000 $6,372,000 $17,574,000
Area 115 - Heap Leach Stacking $6,637,000 $747,000 $7,384,000
Area 120 - Heap Leach Pad & Ponds $5,805,000 $8,404,000 $14,209,000
Area 128 - Merrill-Crowe $7,832,000 $3,174,000 $11,006,000
Area 131 - Refining (incl. Area 128) $0 $0 $0
Area 134 - Reagents $285,000 $31,000 $316,000
Area 360 - Power $1,812,000 $268,000 $2,081,000
Area 362 - Water Supply & Distribution $2,846,000 $1,123,000 $3,969,000
Area 365 - Laboratory $1,626,000 $126,000 $1,752,000
Area 367 - Mobile Equipment $4,834,000 $0 $4,834,000
       
Total Direct Costs $55,286,000 $23,305,000 $78,591,000
       
Spare Parts $1,640,000   $1,640,000
       
Sub Total with Spare Parts     $80,231,000
       
Contingency $12,638,000   $12,638,000
       
Total Direct Costs with Contingency     $92,869,000
       
Mining Costs     $3,022,000
       
Indirect Costs     $9,174,000
       
Other Owner's Costs     $9,506,000
       
Initial Fills     $806,000
       
EPCM     $8,544,000
       
Sub Total Costs before Working Capital     $123,921,000
       
Working Capital (60 days)     $9,381,000
       
TOTAL COSTS (excluding IVA)     $133,301,000

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

21.1.1 Mining Capital Costs

 

IMC has developed an estimate of contract mining costs for the Camino Rojo Project. The estimated mining cost is based on 18,000 tpd of ore production.

 

Overall, mining capital costs amount to a total of US$4.02 million, including US$1.13 million for contractor mobilization, US$1.89 million for mine preproduction and owner equipment and US$995,000 for sustaining capital (contractor demobilization). Mine Capital Costs are presented in Table 21-4.

 

Table 21-4
LOM Mining Capital Costs

 

MINE CAPITAL
COSTS
Units PP Yr1
Q1
Yr1
Q2
Yr1
Q3
Yr1
Q4
Year
2
Year
3
Year
4
Year
5
Year
6
Year
7
TOTAL
Contractor Mobilization ($x1000) 1,130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,130
Contractor Demobilization ($x1000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 995 995
Owner Equipment ($x1000) 525 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 525
Mine Development ($x1000) 1,366 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,366
Mine Infrastructure                       0 0
TOTAL MINE CAPITAL COST ($x1000) 3,022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 995 4,017

 

21.1.1.1 Mining Contractor Mobilization and Demobilization

 

Mine contractor mobilization has been quoted at US$1.13 million. Demobilization costs are quoted at US$995,000 and will occur in Year 7 of the Project.

 

21.1.1.2 Mining Owner Equipment

 

Owner mining equipment includes the equipment required for mine engineering, geology, and surveying personnel and has been estimated at US$525,400 by IMC. The estimate includes four pickup trucks at US$52,500 each. This is a list price from a Tucson dealer. Surveying equipment is based on a supplier quote and includes a fixed ground station and two hand held data collection units, and required software.

 

The estimate includes nine computer workstations at US$4,000 per computer. This covers the computer, one or two monitors each and typical operating system and office product licences. This estimate assumes the main G&A budget includes the major file servers, firewall servers, and internet access equipment. Printers and large format plotter cost estimates are based on recent purchases by IMC.

 

The initial subscription cost for two MineSight software licences has been quoted at US$175,000 for one basic and one extended licence. Additional software such as Leapfrog and AutoCAD are licenced as annual subscription fees and are incorporated in the operating costs.

 

Also included in the overall estimate is a 10% allowance/contingency for smaller items that might be needed. Note that IMC has not shown any replacements for the equipment. With a mine life of just over six years, equipment replacement may not be necessary and therefore, not contemplated.

 

Owner mining equipment costs are summarized in Table 21-5.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-4

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-5

Owner Mining Equipment Capital Costs

 

          Units Total
EQUIPMENT PURCHASE SCHEDULE:      
Pickup Trucks       (none) 4
Surveying Equipment       (none) 1
Computer Workstations     (none) 9
Printer/Scanner/Copier     (none) 2
Large Format Plotters     (none) 1
Software Licence Fees     (none) 2
Total Major Equipment Purchases   (none) 19
EQUIPMENT CAPITAL COST:   Unit Price    
        ($x1000)    
Pickup Trucks     52.5 ($x1000) 210.0
Surveying Equipment     30.8 ($x1000) 30.8
Computer Workstations   4.0 ($x1000) 36.0
Printer/Scanner/Copier   7.9 ($x1000) 15.8
Large Format Plotters   10.0 ($x1000) 10.0
Software Licence Fees   87.5 ($x1000) 175.0
OWNER EQUIPMENT CAPITAL COST   ($x1000) 477.6
CONTINGENCY/MISC @ 10.00%   ($x1000) 47.8
TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST     ($x1000) 525.4

 

21.1.1.3 Mine Development (Preproduction)

 

Mine development or preproduction estimated at US$1.37 million is the estimated operating cost to mine 600,000 tonnes of material during the three-month preproduction period based on the contractor mining quote. The mine development cost is presented in Table 21-6.

 

Table 21-6

Mine Development Capital Costs

 

Description          Units Total
Mining Contractor     ($x1000) 1,026
Blasting Contract     ($x1000) 214
Technical Services Personnel   ($x1000) 81
Technical Services Supplies     ($x1000) 45
Waste Storage Cover     ($x1000)  
Allowance for Controlled Blasting   ($x1000)  
TOTAL COST - Development ($x1000) 1,366

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

21.1.2 Process and Infrastructure Capital Cost Estimate

 

21.1.2.1 Process and Infrastructure Capital Cost Basis

 

Process and infrastructure costs have been estimated by KCA. All equipment and material requirements are based on the design information described in previous sections of this Report. Budgetary capital costs have been estimated primarily based on Project specific quotes for all major and most minor equipment as well as contractor quotes for all major construction contracts. Multiple quotes were received for all major packages (three or more in most cases). Supplier and contractor quotes used in the cost estimates were selected based on a combination of factors including price, completeness of proposal and capabilities of the vendor. Where Project specific quotes were not available a reasonable estimate or allowance was made based on recent quotes in KCA’s files. All capital cost estimates are based on the purchase of equipment quoted new from the manufacturer or to be fabricated new.

 

Each area in the process cost build-up has been separated into the following disciplines, as applicable:

 

· Major earthworks & liner;
· Civil (concrete);
· Structural steel;
· Platework;
· Mechanical equipment;
· Piping;
· Electrical;
· Instrumentation;
· Infrastructure & Buildings;
· Supplier Engineering; and
· Commissioning & Supervision.

 

Pre-production process and infrastructure costs by discipline are presented in Table 21-7.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-7

Summary of Process & Infrastructure Pre-Production Capital Costs by Discipline

 

Discipline Totals Cost @ Source Freight Customs Fees & Duties Total Supply Cost Install Grand Total
  US$ US$ US$ US$ US$ US$
Major Earthworks       $3,781,000 $11,823,000 $15,604,000
Civils (Supply & Install) $358,000     $358,000 $1,019,000 $1,377,000
Structural Steelwork (Supply & Install) $850,000     $850,000 $0 $850,000
Platework (Supply & Install) $1,500,000     $1,500,000 $225,000 $1,725,000
Mechanical Equipment $29,181,000 $4,897,000 $34,078,000 $29,181,000 $4,897,000 $34,078,000
Piping $2,955,000 $1,972,000 $4,927,000 $2,955,000 $1,972,000 $4,927,000
Electrical $2,829,000 $500,000 $3,329,000 $2,829,000 $500,000 $3,329,000
Instrumentation $817,000 $119,000 $936,000 $817,000 $119,000 $936,000
Infrastructure & Buildings $13,015,000 $0 $0 $13,015,000 $22,000 $13,036,000
Supplier Engineering         $2,117,000 $2,117,000
Commissioning & Supervision         $612,000 $612,000
Spare Parts       $1,640,000   $1,640,000
Contingency       $12,638,000   $12,638,000
             
Total Direct Costs $51,505,000 $7,488,000 $43,270,000 $69,564,000 $23,306,000 $92,869,000

 

Freight, customs fees and duties, and installation costs are also considered for each discipline. Freight costs are based on loads as bulk freight and have been estimated at 10% of the equipment cost. Where applicable, supplier quoted freight cost estimates for equipment were used in place of estimated freight. Quoted freight accounts for approximately 35% of the total freight costs.

 

Installation costs are based on the contractor quotes based on a detailed equipment list and estimated equipment weights or included in turn-key supplier packages. Quoted contractor costs include all labour, tools and support equipment required for proper placement and installation of equipment.

 

Where not directly quoted, installation is based an hourly installation rate of US$39.11 which is derived from the contractor quote and estimated installation hours based on supply costs.

 

Engineering, procurement, and construction management (EPCM), indirect costs, and initial fills inventory are also considered as part of the capital cost estimate.

 

21.1.2.2 Major Earthworks and Liner

 

Earthworks and liner quantities for the Project have been estimated by KCA for all Project areas. Earthworks and liner supply and installation will be performed by contractors with imported fill being supplied by the mining contractor. Unit rates for site earthworks and liner supply and installation are based on contractor quotes. The earthworks and liner discipline also includes cost for materials to construct the crushing retaining wall.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Total preproduction earthworks costs are estimated at US$15.6 million including an allowance of US$2.8 million for pad cover production and placement, which is based on an estimated cost of US$12.00 per cubic meter of pad cover produced.

 

21.1.2.3 Civils

 

Civils include detailed earthworks and concrete. Concrete quantities have been estimated by KCA based on layouts, similar equipment installations, vibrating equipment, major equipment weights and on slab areas. Unit costs for concrete supply, which include production (supply of aggregates, water and cement, batching and mixing), and delivery of concrete have and concrete installation which include all excavations, formwork, rebar, placement and curing are based on contractor quotes. Total costs for concrete are estimated at US$1.4 million.

 

21.1.2.4 Structural Steel

 

Costs for structural steel, including steel grating, structural steel, and handrails are primarily quoted by suppliers as part of equipment supply packages or included in supplier turnkey proposals.

 

Total costs for structural steel not included in equipment package supply costs are estimated at US$850,000, which is the quoted crushing plant structural steel requirements.

 

21.1.2.5 Platework

 

The platework discipline includes costs for the supply and installation of steel tanks, bins, and chutes. Platework costs have been primarily quoted as part of complete equipment supply packages.

 

Total platework costs not included in the mechanical equipment supply costs are estimated at US$1.7 million including the quoted crushing circuit platework costs and quoted field erected raw water tank.

 

21.1.2.6 Mechanical Equipment

 

Costs for mechanical equipment are based on a detailed equipment list developed of all major equipment for the process. Costs for all major and most minor equipment items are based on budgetary quotes from suppliers. Where Project specific supplier quotes were not available, reasonable allowances were made based on recent quotes from KCA’s files. All costs assume equipment purchased new from the manufacturer or to be fabricated new.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The mechanical equipment costs consider a complete turn-key bid for the Merrill-Crowe, Refinery and Cyanide dissolution system, complete engineering design and supply package for the crushing and reclaim systems and various equipment supply packages by several different suppliers. Installation costs for mechanical equipment are based on contractor quotes or are included as part of turn-key vendor packages.

 

The total installed mechanical equipment cost is estimated at US$34.1 million.

 

21.1.2.7 Piping

 

Major piping, including heap irrigation and gravity solution collection pipes and water distribution pipes (raw water and fire water) are based on material take-offs and supplier quotes. Piping for the Merrill-Crowe and cyanide dissolution systems are included in the turn-key vendor supply package and are included in the mechanical equipment costs. Additional ancillary piping, fittings, and valve costs have been estimated on a percentage basis of the mechanical equipment supply costs by area ranging from 0% to 5%.

 

Installation costs for major piping is based on contractor quotes. Installation of ancillary piping has been estimated based on unit installation rates from the installation contractor and estimated installation hours based on the material supply costs. The total installed piping cost is estimated at US$4.9 million.

 

21.1.2.8 Electrical

 

Major electrical equipment including transformers, substations, site powerlines, motor control centres and VFDs have been considered in the electrical equipment list and have been costed based on supplier / contractor quotes or have been included as part of turn-key or complete vendor supply packages. Also considered in electrical is the cost to relocate the electrical power line which services the town of El Berrendo.

 

Miscellaneous electrical costs have been estimated as percentages of the mechanical equipment supply cost for each process area and range between 0 and 25%. Costs for the power supply line to the Project site are assumed to occur during Year 1 of operations and have been costed based on a contractor quote and assumed connection point and distribution voltage. The distribution power line to site is currently pending CFE review and decision on the final connection point.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-10

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Installation of electrical equipment and ancillary electrical items not included in turn-key vendor packages have been estimated based on unit installation rates from the installation contractor quote and estimated installation hours based on the material supply costs. Supply and installation of the distribution powerline is based on a contractor quote.

 

The total installed electrical cost is estimated at US$3.3 million.

 

21.1.2.9 Instrumentation

 

Instrumentation costs are primarily included as part of turn-key or complete vendor supply packages. Minor miscellaneous instrumentation costs have been estimated as percentages of the mechanical equipment supply cost for each process area and range between 0 and 3%. An allowance of US$350,000 has been included for communication equipment.

 

The total installed instrumentation cost is estimated at US$936,000.

 

21.1.2.10 Infrastructure & Buildings

 

Infrastructure and buildings for the Camino Rojo Project include the construction of a 250-person man camp for operations and construction, an administration building, mine truck shop, mine contractor offices, warehouse, guard house, on-site clinic, powder magazine, and light vehicle workshop. Process buildings including the laboratory, process workshop, reagents storage building, Merrill-Crowe plant and refinery are also included. Costs for the man camp and site buildings have been quoted by contractors or are included as part of the vendor supply package.

 

Water supply to the main water tank will be by production wells. One production well is in place. An additional two production wells will be developed to provide redundancy. The production wells consider 200mm cased wells in 350mm boreholes and have an estimated cost of US$350,000 each, including the cost of the well pump, discharge pipe and cabling. An allowance of US$375,000 is also included for five monitoring wells based on costs of wells drilled on the property.

 

An allowance of US$5.60 per meter of barb wire fencing for the site perimeter has been included as well as US$500,000 for modifications to the existing highway for safer access to the Project site.

 

The total infrastructure and buildings cost is estimated at US$13.0 million.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

21.1.2.11 Supplier Engineering and Installation Supervision / Commissioning

 

Supplier engineering costs have been quoted for the crushing system as well as the recovery plant and include the costs for detailed engineering for the complete or turn-key supply packages. The total cost for supplier engineering is estimated at US$2.1 million.

 

Costs for installation and commissioning supervision has been quoted by suppliers as either a fixed cost or cost per time period and are considered for all major equipment items. Total cost for installation and commissioning supervision are estimated at US$600,000.

 

21.1.2.12 Process Mobile Equipment

 

Mobile equipment included in the capital cost estimate are detailed in Table 21-8.

 

Table 21-8

Process Mobile Equipment

 

Description Quantity
CAT 992 Loader or Equiv. 1
CAT D6 Dozer or Equiv. 1
Mechanical Service Truck 1
Forklift, 2.5 ton 3
Telehandler, 4 ton 1
Pickup Truck, ¾ ton 7
Backhoe w/ Fork Attachment, 1.1 cu. yd. 1
Boom Truck, 10 ton 1
Crane, 50 ton 1
Bobcat 1

 

 

Costs for process mobile equipment are based on cost guides or other published data. Mobile equipment costs are considered in the mechanical equipment cost estimate.

 

21.1.2.13 Spare Parts

 

Spare parts costs are estimated at 6% of the mechanical equipment supply costs. Total spare parts costs are estimated at US$1.6 million.

 

21.1.2.14 Process & Infrastructure Contingency

 

Contingency for the process and infrastructure has been applied to the total direct costs by discipline. Contingency has been applied ranging from 15% to 20% as detailed in Table 21-9. The overall contingency for process and infrastructure is estimated at 16.1% of the direct costs.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-12

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-9

Process & Infrastructure Contingency

 

Direct Costs Contingency % Total (US$)
Major Earthworks 20% $3,121,000
Civils (Supply & Install) 20% $275,000
Structural Steelwork 15% $128,000
Platework 15% $259,000
Mechanical Equipment 15% $5,112,000
Piping 15% $739,000
Electrical 15% $499,000
Instrumentation 15% $140,000
Infrastructure & Buildings 15% $1,955,000
Supplier Engineering 15% $317,000
Commissioning & Supervision 15% $92,000
     
 Total Contingency on Direct Costs 16.1% $12,638,000

 

21.1.2.15 Process & Infrastructure Sustaining Capital

 

Sustaining capital for process and infrastructure includes the costs for constructing a powerline to the Project site in Year 1 of operations, the expansion of the heap leach pad and addition of an overland conveying equipment in Year 2 of operation, the addition of 5 each pit dewatering wells pumps and evaporators for pit dewatering in Year 3 and the replacement of some of the process mobile equipment. Total sustaining capital is estimated at US$20.4 million including contingency.

 

21.1.3 Construction Indirect Costs

 

Indirect field costs include temporary construction facilities, construction services, quality control, survey support, warehouse and fenced yards, support equipment, etc. These costs have been estimated based on 16 months of field construction, contractor quotes, and reasonable allowances based on KCA’s recent experience. Construction indirect costs are summarized in Table 21-10. A 20% contingency has been applied to the estimated construction indirect costs.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-13

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-10

Construction Indirect Costs

 

Indirect Field Costs Basis Total (US$)
Misc. Hotels, etc. $150/night, avg. 3 rooms per month $216,000
QA/QC Earthworks, Liner and Concrete Contractor Quote $607,000
Surveying Contractor Quote $186,000
Temporary Construction Camp Set-Up Allowance $500,000
Camp Operations Contractor Quote $3,437,000
Construction Equipment Rentals & Operating Costs $40k / month Allowance $640,000
Office Equipment (copiers, Printers, Computers, Plotter) Allowance $100,000
Construction Vehicle O&M (6 Pickups + Flatbed) 50 km /day ea. @ $1.48/km $249,000
Construction Tools Allowance $150,000
Construction Phone / Internet $5000/month Allowance $80,000
Construction Power Opex and Rental $8000/month genset rental, 2 generators / ~2,100 L/day diesel consumption $1,051,000
Portable Toilet Service $15k/month Allowance $240,000
Outside Consultants / Vendor Reps Allowance $100,000
Construction Office Trailers / Containers (Purchase & set-up) Allowance (3 ea. @ $30k/trailer) $90,000
     
Sub Total Indirect Costs   $7,645,000
     
Indirect Contingency 20% $1,529,000
     
Total Indirect Costs   $9,174,000

 

21.1.4 Other Owner’s Construction Costs

 

Other Owner’s construction costs are intended to cover the following items:

 

· Owner’s costs for labour, offices, home office support, vehicles, travel and consultants during construction.
· Subscriptions, licence fees, etc.
· Taxes and Permits.
· Work place health and safety costs during construction.

 

Other Owner’s construction costs are estimated based on 16 months of site construction and are summarized in Table 21-11. A 20% contingency has been applied to the estimated Other Owner’s construction costs.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-14

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-11

Other Owner’s Construction Costs

 

Other Owner's Costs Basis Total (US$)
Labor 2/3 G&A labor for 16 months $2,277, 000
Office Supplies/Subscriptions Allowance $250,000
Vehicles 1 ea. 3/4 ton and 11 ea. Light duty pickup trucks $430,000
Vehicle OPEX 12 @ 100 km/day @ $0.63/km, 16 months $367,920
Off-Site Office Allowance $230,000
Public Relations Expense Allowance $500,000
Communications $75k/year allowance, 16 months $100,000
Insurance Allowance $200,000
Safety Supplies Allowance $33,000
Training & Training Supplies Allowance $250,000
Travel Allowance $86,250
Legal Allowance $150,000
IT, Internet, Software, computers Allowance $150,000
Waste Management Allowance $150,000
Medical Supplies Allowance $50,000
Land Use Change 3182.4 Ha equivalents @ MXN 14002.49 / Ha $2,309,000
Cactus Relocation   $259,000
CENACE Study MXN 2,000,000 - CENACE $104,000
CENACE Consultant Contractor Quote $26,000
     
Sub Total Other Owner's Costs   $7,922,000
     
Other Owner's Costs Contingency 20% $1,584,000
     
Total Other Owner's Costs   $9,506,000

 

21.1.5 Initial Fills Inventory

 

The initial fills consist of consumable items stored on site at the outset of operations, which includes sodium cyanide (NaCN), lime, zinc, diatomaceous earth (DE), antiscalant, lead nitrate and fluxes. Initial fills are summarized in Table 21-12.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-15

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-12
Initial Fills

 

Item Basis  Needed
Weight
 Truckloads  Quantity to
Order
 Unit
Price
Total Cost
(Excluding
IVA)
     kg or l    kg or l  US$ US$
             
NaCN 30 Days          262,500                 13.1          260,000           2.50 $650,000
             
Zinc 31 days              4,000                   0.2              4,000           5.26 $21,000
Diatomaceous Earth (D.E.) 30 days            54,810                   2.7            60,000           1.16 $70,000
Antiscalant 4 weeks            11,500                   0.6            11,500           3.19 $37,000
Lime (CaO) full silo          120,000                   6.0          120,000           0.15 $18,000
             
Flux            
        SiO2                2,000                   0.1              2,000           0.50 $1,000
        Borax                2,000                   0.1              2,000           0.98 $2,000
        Niter                2,000                   0.1              2,000           1.75 $3,500
        Soda Ash                2,000                   0.1              2,000           1.70 $3,400
             
TOTAL $806,000

 

21.1.6 Engineering, Procurement & Construction Management

 

The estimated costs for engineering, procurement and construction management (EPCM) for the development, construction, and commissioning are based on a percentage of the direct capital cost. The total EPCM cost is estimated at US$8.5 million, or 9.2% of the process and infrastructure direct costs.

 

The EPCM costs cover services and expenses for the following areas:

 

· Project Management.
· Detailed Engineering.
· Engineering Support.
· Procurement.
· Construction Management.
· Commissioning.
· Vendors Reps.

 

For some major equipment packages, costs associated with detailed engineering, commissioning, and installation supervision have been included in the vendor’s quotes; these costs are reflected in the supplier engineering estimate of the capital costs and have been considered when estimating the EPCM costs and are not included in this estimate.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-16

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

21.1.7 Working Capital

 

Working capital is money that is used to cover operating costs from start-up until a positive cash flow is achieved. Once a positive cash flow is attained, Project expenses will be paid from earnings. Working capital for the Project is estimated to be US$9.4 million based on 60 days of operation and includes all mine, process and G&A operating costs as well as process pre-production costs.

 

21.1.8 IVA

 

IVA is a value added tax which is applied at 16% to all goods and services in Mexico. IVA is not considered in the capital and operating costs; however, is included as part of the economic model. IVA is assumed to be completely refundable within one calendar year.

 

21.1.9 Exclusions

 

The following capital cost considerations have been excluded from the scope of supply and estimate:

 

· Finance charges and interest during construction.
· Escalation costs.
· Currency exchange fluctuations.
     
21.2 Operating Costs

 

Process operating costs for the Camino Rojo Project have been estimated based on information presented in earlier sections of this Report. Mining costs were provided by IMC at US$2.14 per tonne mined (LOM US$3.30 per tonne of ore) and are based on quotes for contract mining with estimated owner’s mining costs.

 

Process operating costs have been estimated by KCA from first principles. Labour costs were estimated using project specific staffing, salary and wage and benefit requirements. Unit consumptions of materials, supplies, power, water and delivered supply costs were also estimated. LOM average processing costs are estimated at US$3.38 per tonne ore

 

General administrative costs (G&A) have been estimated by KCA with input from Orla mining. G&A costs include project specific labour and salary requirements and operating expenses including social contributions and land and water rights. G&A costs are estimated at US$1.75 per tonne ore.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-17

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Operating costs were estimated based on 1st quarter 2019 US dollars and are presented with no added contingency based upon the design and operating criteria present in this report. IVA is not included in the operating cost estimate.

 

The operating costs presented are based upon the ownership of all process production equipment and site facilities, including the onsite laboratory. The owner will employ and direct all operating maintenance and support personnel for all site activities.

 

Operating costs estimates have been based upon information obtained from the following sources:

 

· Contractor mining quotes and owner mining costs from IMC;
· G&A costs estimated by KCA with input from Orla;
· Project metallurgical test work and process engineering;
· Supplier quotes for reagents and fuel
· Recent KCA project file data; and
· Experience of KCA staff with other similar operations.

 

Where specific data do not exist, cost allowances have been based upon consumption and operating requirements from other similar properties for which reliable data exist. Freight costs have been estimated where delivered prices were not available.

 

21.2.1 Mining Operating Costs

 

Mine operating costs are based on contractor quotes, owner mining personnel from first principles and estimated supplies and support services. Costs for pit wall supports have been estimated by Piteau Associates. Costs for pit dewatering have been estimated by KCA based on pumping volumes estimated by Barranca and are included in the process operating cost. Total mine operating cost during commercial production is estimated at US$145.2 million. This amounts to US$2.14 per tonne of material mined and US$3.30 per ore tonne. LOM mining operating costs are presented in Table 21-13.

 

There are some specific risks related to contract mining. There is risk that the contractor may need financial assistance from the owner either in terms of cash, or loan guarantees, to procure some equipment, increasing the capital cost. Contract mining is common in Mexico and risks can be reduced by careful selection of the contractor.

 

At the end of mining about 1.65 million tonnes of clean waste will be re-handled to cover transition and sulphide waste exposed in the centre of the facility. The estimated cost for this is US$1.46 million. This estimate was prepared by IMC and is included in the cost estimate.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-18

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-13
Contract Mining Cost Summary

 

MINE OPERATING COSTS: Units PP Yr1
Q1
Yr1
Q2
Yr1
Q3
Yr1
Q4
Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 TOTAL
Mining Contractor ($x1000) 1,026 4,687 5,633 5,626 5,633 22,534 21,812 17,536 15,592 14,391 6,598 121,068
Blasting Contract ($x1000) 214 563 668 667 668 2,670 2,599 2,179 1,987 1,830 279 14,324
Technical Services Personnel ($x1000) 81 122 128 128 128 513 513 513 513 374 175 3,189
Technical Services Supplies ($x1000) 45 65 68 68 77 308 308 308 308 238 113 1,905
Pit Stabilization ($x1000) 0 60 35 30 34 175 419 450 591 633 250 2,679
Pit Dewatering ($x1000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Waste Storage Cover ($x1000)                     1,462 1,462
Allowance for Controlled Blasting ($x1000)   12 62 17 0 89 414 438 359 485 88 1,965
TOTAL OPERATING COST - Commercial ($x1000)   5,510 6,594 6,536 6,540 26,289 26,065 21,424 19,351 17,951 8,965 145,225
TOTAL OPERATING COST - Development ($x1000) 1,366                     1,366
Total Material (Ex-Pit Only) (kt) 601 2,680 3,300 3,296 3,300 13,201 12,778 10,273 9,134 8,198 988 67,749
Total Ore (kt) 0 922 1,645 1,642 1,644 6,572 6,569 6,570 6,570 6,570 5,316 44,020
Cost Per Total Tonne (US$/t)   2.056 1.998 1.983 1.982 1.991 2.040 2.085 2.119 2.190 9.074 2.144
Cost Per Ore Tonne (US$/t) 0.000 5.976 4.009 3.981 3.978 4.000 3.968 3.261 2.945 2.732 1.686 3.299

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-19

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

21.2.1.1 Contract Mining Cost Basis

 

Contract mining costs are based on contractor quotes and are summarized in Table 21-14. The quoted contract mining rate is US$1.707 per total tonne and was not broken out by material type or destination; however, separate estimates for drilling, loading, hauling, and auxiliary equipment are included. A US$1.118 per tonne rehandle cost was estimated by IMC based on loading, hauling, and 50% of the auxiliary equipment from the contractor quote. The contract mining cost estimate is based on 74.2 million total tonnes moved. This includes 4.85 million tonnes of ore rehandle from stockpiles and 1.65 million tonnes of waste rehandle in Year 7 to cap sulphide and transition waste in the waste storage facility. Waste rehandle is not included in the contractor quote; IMC has prepared a separate estimate for this cost. The contractor quote includes diesel fuel, but does not include blasting. The life of mine estimate for mining contract cost is US$121.1 million or about US$1.67 per total tonne.

 

21.2.1.2 Blasting & Mine Technical Services Costs

 

Costs for blasting are based on contractor quotes and are summarized in Table 21-15. The blasting agents and services contract includes costs to load and detonate the blast holes. The quotation is based on a cost of US$0.168 per tonne for blasting supplies and a fixed cost of 728,102 pesos per month for services. At an exchange rate of 19.3 pesos to the US dollar the services amount to US$37,725 per month. The life of mine estimate for blasting amounts to about US$0.211 per total tonne blasted.

 

Mine technical services and supplies includes the cost for engineering, geology, surveying and grade control personnel, and an allowance for supplies and is summarized in Table 21-16 by time period. It is assumed that the chief engineer will be the primary contact for the mining and blasting contractors. The estimate also includes an allowance of 50% of the personnel costs for supplies and consumables. This is to cover office supplies, fuel and repairs for the pickups, repair and maintenance costs for office equipment, training, conventions, consultant reviews, etc.

 

There is also a separate line item for major software support. MineSight support has been quoted at 20% of the initial purchase price per year. The first-year subscription is included in the purchase price, so this charge does not start until the 4th quarter of Year 1. The subscription cost for one Leapfrog key is US$13,000 per year and two AutoCAD seats are about US$3,000 per year (US$1,500 each). These are US$16,000 per year or US$4,000 per quarter. Personnel plus supplies costs amount to US$5.10 million over the Project life.

 

21.2.1.3 Pit Wall Support Costs

 

Wall support costs are based on information provided by Piteau and are estimated at US$2.68 million over the mine life as detailed in Table 21-17. Linear metres of new final wall for 10m single benches and 20m double benches are shown by year. These are for areas in the north and west wall specified by Piteau for support to steepen the slope angles. Drilling costs for the 10m and 20m holes are based on US$6.81 per meter based on a quotation provided for wall control drilling. Cost estimates for support dowels were provided by Piteau. For single benches 1.7m spacing between dowels was proposed at a cost of US$85.75 per dowel. For double benches 0.6m spacing between dowels was proposed at a cost of US$159.50 per dowel. The cost per dowel includes #10 rebar inserted in the hole, and the hole filled with concrete.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-20

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

21.2.1.4 Presplitting for Wall Control

 

This estimate assumes that all the 20m high, double-benched, walls will require presplitting. These are assumed to be 102mm (4 inch) diameter holes drilled at an angle of 72 degrees with about 0.5m of subgrade drilling so each hole is about 21.5m long. The spacing between holes is estimated at 1.25m. Table 21-18 shows a cost estimate. The top line on the table is meters of double-benched, final wall, developed each year. The estimates of the number of holes per year and meters drilled are derived from this data. The estimated cost for this drilling is US$6.81 per meter, based on a contractor quotation. Powder loading for presplit blasting is relatively low at about 1kg per square meter of wall. Required explosives per hole are one 25kg packaged charge at US$43.48 and a detonator at about US$9.74 for about US$53.22 per hole. It is assumed that hole loading and detonation is included in the fixed monthly cost for the blasting contractor services discussed with blasting agents and services above. Total cost, life of mine, is about US$1.96 million or US$0.027 per total tonne. This comes to about US$200 per hole.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-21

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-14
Contract Mining Costs Based on Unit Rates

 

Material Type Unit Cost Units PP Yr1
Q1
Yr1
Q2
Yr1
Q3
Yr1
Q4
Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 TOTAL
Leach   1.707 ($x1000) 171 1,403 2,808 2,803 2,806 11,218 11,213 11,215 11,215 10,609 1,576 67,037
Low Grade 1.707 ($x1000) 5 319 0 0 533 993 2,967 2,161 1,127 0 0 8,105
Overburden 1.707 ($x1000) 850 2,059 1,425 239 548 777 51 0 0 0 0 5,949
Waste   1.707 ($x1000) 0 794 1,400 2,584 1,746 9,546 7,581 4,160 3,250 3,385 111 34,557
Rehandle   1.118 ($x1000) 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 397 4,911 5,420
Waste Rehandle 0 ($x1000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Cost     ($x1000) 1,026 4,687 5,633 5,626 5,633 22,534 21,812 17,536 15,592 14,391 6,598 121,068
Cost Per Ore Tonne   (US$) 0.000 5.083 3.424 3.426 3.426 3.429 3.320 2.669 2.373 2.190 1.241 2.750
Cost Per Total Tonne   (US$) 1.707 1.686 1.707 1.707 1.707 1.707 1.707 1.707 1.707 1.683 1.226 1.668

 

Table 21-15
Contract Blasting Costs Based on Unit Rates

 

Description     Units PP Yr1
Q1
Yr1
Q2
Yr1
Q3
Yr1
Q4
Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 TOTAL
Ex-Pit Ktonnes     ($x1000) 601 2,680 3,300 3,296 3,300 13,201 12,778 10,273 9,134 8,198 988 67,749
Blasting Supplies @ 0.168 /tonne ($x1000) 101 450 554 554 554 2,218 2,147 1,726 1,535 1,377 166 11,382
Months/Period     ($x1000) 3 3 3 3 3 12 12 12 12 12 3 78
Services @ pesos 728,102 /month (MXNx1000) 2,184 2,184 2,184 2,184 2,184 8,737 8,737 8,737 8,737 8,737 2,184 56,792
Services @ 19.3 Pesos/$ ($x1000) 113 113 113 113 113 453 453 453 453 453 113 2,943
Total Cost       ($x1000) 214 563 668 667 668 2,670 2,599 2,179 1,987 1,830 279 14,324
Cost Per Ex-Pit Tonne   (US$) 0.356 0.210 0.202 0.202 0.202 0.202 0.203 0.212 0.218 0.223 0.283 0.211

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-22

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-16
Owner Mine Personnel & Technical Services

 

    Year  
JOB DESCRIPTION Unit PP Y1Q1 Y1Q2 Y1Q3 Y1Q4 2 3 4 5 6 7 TOTAL
TECHNICAL SERVICES:                          
Chief Mining Engineer persons 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1  
Mining Engineer persons 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1  
Chief Geologist persons 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  
Geologist persons 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1  
Chief Surveyor persons 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1  
Technicians persons 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2  
TOTAL PERSONNEL persons 5.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 6.0  
Mine Technical Services Total ($x1000) 81.4 122.3 128.3 128.3 128.3 513.1 513.1 513.1 513.1 373.6 174.8 3,189
Supplies/Consumables @ 50% 40.7 61.1 64.1 64.1 64.1 256.6 256.6 256.6 256.6 186.8 87.4 1,595
Software Support   4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 12.8 51.2 51.2 51.2 51.2 51.2 25.6 310
TOTAL   126.1 187.4 196.4 196.4 205.2 820.9 820.9 820.9 820.9 611.6 287.8 5,095

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-23

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-17

Pit Wall Support Costs

 

Wall Support Requirements     Units PP Yr1
Q1
Yr1
Q2
Yr1
Q3
Yr1
Q4
Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 TOTAL
10m Benches:                                
  New Final Wall Length     (m)   668 384 329 380 1,932 222         3,915
  Number of Dowels @ 1.7 m spacing (none)   393 226 194 224 1,136 131         2,303
  Meters of Drilling @ 10 m/hole (m)   3,929 2,259 1,935 2,235 11,365 1,306         23,029
  Drilling Cost @ $6.81 / meter ($x1000)   27 15 13 15 77 9         157
  Rebar and Grouting @ $85.75 / dowel ($x1000)   34 19 17 19 97 11         197
  Total Cost       ($x1000)   60 35 30 34 175 20         354
20m Benches:                                
  New Final Wall Length     (m)             810 913 1,200 1,285 508 4,716
  Number of Dowels @ 0.6 m spacing (none)             1,350 1,522 2,000 2,142 847 7,860
  Meters of Drilling @ 20 m/hole (m)             27,000 30,433 40,000 42,833 16,933 157,200
  Drilling Cost @ $6.81 / meter ($x1000)             184 207 272 292 115 1,071
  Rebar and Grouting @ $159.50 / dowel ($x1000)             215 243 319 342 135 1,254
  Total Cost       ($x1000)             399 450 591 633 250 2,324
Total Wall Support Cost     ($x1000)   60 35 30 34 175 419 450 591 633 250 2,679

 

Table 21-18

Wall Control Drilling Costs

 

Wall Presplitting Requirements   Units PP Yr1
Q1
Yr1
Q2
Yr1
Q3
Yr1
Q4
Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 TOTAL
Drilling Requirements:                              
  New Final Wall Length (20m Benches) (m)   74 390 105 0 557 2,590 2,745 2,250 3,040 550 12,301
  Number of Holes @ 1.25 m spacing (none)   59 312 84 0 446 2,072 2,196 1,800 2,432 440 9,841
  Meters Drilled @ 21.5 / hole (m)   1,273 6,708 1,806 0 9,580 44,546 47,212 38,699 52,286 9,460 211,570
Costs:                                
  Drilling @   6.81 / m (US$)   8,667 45,680 12,298 0 65,240 303,361 321,516 263,538 356,069 64,420 1,440,790
  Explosives/Supplies @ 53.22 / hole (US$)   3,151 16,605 4,470 0 23,715 110,272 116,871 95,796 129,431 23,417 523,727
  Loading and Detonating Included   (US$)                        
Total Presplitting Cost     (US$)   11,818 62,284 16,769 0 88,955 413,633 438,387 359,334 485,500 87,837 1,964,517
Total Tonnes - Commercial Production   (kt)   2,780 3,300 3,296 3,300 13,201 12,778 10,273 9,134 8,553 7,031 73,646
Cost Per Total Tonne     (US$)   0.004 0.019 0.005 0.000 0.007 0.032 0.043 0.039 0.057 0.012 0.027

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-24

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

21.2.2 Process and G&A Operating Costs

 

Average annual process and G&A operating costs are presented in Table 21-19.

 

Table 21-19

Average Process, Support & G&A Operating Cost

 

        Unit Annual US$ per
  Units Cost Type Qty Costs, US$ Costs, US$ Tonne Ore
             
Labor            
Process ea Fixed 123   $2,494,543 $0.43
Laboratory ea Fixed 18   $353,642 $0.06
SUBTOTAL         $2,848,184 $0.45
             
Crushing            
Power kWh/year Variable 10805619 $0.125 $1,352,588 $0.22
992 Loader h/mo Fixed 414 $172.37 $856,811 $0.14
Wear   Variable     $1,257,714 $0.20
Overhaul & Maintenance   Variable     $628,857 $0.10
SUBTOTAL         $4,095,970 $0.65
             
Reclaim & Convey/Stacking            
Power kWh/year Variable 12284447 $0.125 $1,537,700 $0.26
D-6 Dozer h/mo Fixed 480 $48.38 $278,644 $0.04
Maintenance Supplies lot Variable     $314,429 $0.05
SUBTOTAL         $2,130,772 $0.34
             
Heap Leach Systems            
Power kWh/year Variable 6796789 $0.125 $850,785 $0.14
Piping lot Variable     $188,657 $0.03
Maintenance Supplies lot Variable     $62,886 $0.01
SUBTOTAL         $1,102,328 $0.18
             
Merrill-Crowe            
Power kWh/year Variable 1962094 $0.125 $245,604 $0.04
DE kg/year Variable 504,944 $1.165 $588,127 $0.09
Zinc kg/yr Variable 55,198 $5.26 $290,233 $0.05
Lead Nitrate kg/yr Variable 5,520 $5.76 $31,783 $0.01
Filter Cloths (Press) sets/year Fixed 12 $8,000.00 $96,000 $0.01
Filter Cloths (Clarifier) sets/year Fixed 4 $8,000.00 $32,000 $0.01
Misc. Operating Supplies lot Variable     $125,771 $0.02
SUBTOTAL         $1,409,519 $0.22
             
Refinery            
Power kWh/year Variable 1032608 $0.125 $129,256 $0.02
Misc. Operating Supplies lot Variable     $125,771 $0.02
Maintenance Supplies lot Variable     $62,886 $0.01
SUBTOTAL         $317,913 $0.05
             
Reagents            
Power kWh/year Variable 147616 $0.125 $18,478 $0.00
Lime kg/t Variable 1.250 $0.153 $1,202,689 $0.19
Cyanide (Ore) kg/t Variable 0.35 $2.50 $5,502,500 $0.88
Antiscalant L/year Variable 167,695 $3.19 $534,411 $0.09
Fluxes kg/oz Variable 0.054 $1.85 $59,092 $0.01
Maintenance Supplies lot Variable     $62,886 $0.01

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-25

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

        Unit Annual US$ per
  Units Cost Type Qty Costs, US$ Costs, US$ Tonne Ore
SUBTOTAL         $7,380,056 $1.174
             
Water Supply & Distribution            
Power kWh/year Variable 1333333 $0.125 $166,899 $0.03
Pit Dewatering Treatment kWh/year Variable 873,399 $0.125 $85,647 $0.01
Maintenance Supplies lot Variable     $125,771 $0.02
SUBTOTAL         $378,318 $0.06
             
Laboratory            
Power kWh/year Variable 2228991 $0.125 $279,013 $0.04
Assays, Solids No/d Fixed 150 $7.00 $383,250 $0.06
Assays, Solutions No/d Fixed 100 $3.00 $109,500 $0.02
Misc. Supplies lot Variable     $125,771 $0.02
SUBTOTAL         $897,534 $0.14
             
Support Services / Facilities            
Power kWh/year Variable 1968151 $0.125 $246,362 $0.04
Fork Lift, 2.5 t h/mo Fixed 180 $6.55 $14,159 $0.00
Telehandler h/mo Fixed 120 $22.95 $33,051 $0.01
Boom Truck 10 t h/mo Fixed 90 $13.90 $15,011 $0.00
Backhoe/loader h/mo Fixed 180 $22.15 $47,846 $0.01
Pickup Trucks (7) km/d Fixed 350 $1.51 $192,512 $0.03
Maintenance Truck km/d Fixed 100 $0.82 $29,878 $0.01
Crane - Rough Terrain h/mo Fixed 24 $36.97 $10,649 $0.00
Bobcat h/mo Fixed 180 $8.00 $17,280 $0.00
Maintenance Supplies lot Variable     $125,771 $0.00
SUBTOTAL         $732,519 $0.12
             
TOTAL COST (w/o contingency)         $21,293,114 $3.38
             
Contingency         $0 $0.000
             
Sub-TOTAL COST (process only excluding IVA)         $21,293,114 $3.38
             
IVA (16% of materials costs)         $1,545,190 $0.25
             
TOTAL COST (process only including IVA)         $22,838,304 $3.63
             
G&A            
G&A Labor ea   126   $2,561,477 $0.41
G&A Expenses         $5,770,746 $0.92
San Tiburcio Social Contribution         $790,440 $0.13
Other Social Commitments         $50,624 $0.01
Land Access Agreements         $0 $0.000
Water Rights         $456,557 $0.07
Concessions         $142,784 $0.02
TOTAL COST G&A*         $9,772,628 $1.55
             
TOTAL COST (excluding IVA)         $31,065,743 $4.94
             

 

       *Note: Average G&A does not include G&A costs during the reclamation and closure period.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-26

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

21.2.2.1 Personnel and Staffing

 

Staffing requirements for process and administration personnel have been estimated by KCA based on experience with similar sized operations with input from Orla on wages and salary information. Staffing will be primarily by Mexican nationals with an emphasis of hiring as many workers from the local community as possible. Total process personnel are estimated at 143 persons including 18 laboratory workers. G&A labour is estimated at 126 persons plus an additional 17 support personnel included in the mine cost estimate. Mining labour will be provided by the mining contractor and is considered in the mining cost estimate.

 

Personnel requirements and costs are estimated at US$5.4 million per year and are summarized in Table 21-20.

 

Table 21-20
Personnel & Staffing Summary

 

Description Number of Workers Cost US$/yr
Process Supervision 13 $822,275
Crushing & Reclaim 17 $236,021
Heap Leach 28 $366,298
Recovery Plant 26 $364,790
Maintenance 41 $727.365
Subtotal Process 125 $2,516,748
Laboratory 18 $361,985
Subtotal Laboratory 18 $361,985
G&A 126 $2,561,477
Subtotal G&A 126 $2,561,477
TOTAL 269 $5,440,211

 

21.2.2.2 Power

 

Power usage for the process and process-related infrastructure was derived from estimated connected loads assigned to powered equipment from the mechanical equipment list. Equipment power demands under normal operation were assigned and coupled with estimated on-stream times to determine the average energy usage and cost. Power requirements for the Project are presented in Table 18-2 in Section 18 of this report excluding pit dewatering power requirements. Attached power for pit dewatering is estimated at 410 kW with demand varying based on pit dewatering requirements.

 

The total attached power for the process and infrastructure is estimated at 7.7 MW, with an average draw of 4.6 MW at start up increasing to 8.0 MW attached with a demand of 4.8 MW in Year 3 of operations (not including pit dewatering). The total consumed power for these areas is approximately 5.95 kWh/t ore processed increasing to 6.15 kWh/t ore processed in Year 3. Power will initially be supplied by temporary leased generators as well as an existing powerline that runs along the highway adjacent to the Project site with capacity to supply as estimated 1MW of power to select project areas. The approximate power cost at start-up is estimated at US$0.29/kWh and is based on 1 MW of line power from the existing power line at US$0.10 per kWh and generated power at US$0.34 per kWh. Generated power costs are based on the following:

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-27

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

· US$340,000 per month lease / maintenance rate based on supplier quote
· Fuel consumption of 0.33 L diesel/kWh
· Diesel price of US$0.88/L not including IVA

 

In Year 2 power is expected to be supplied to the Project site by an overhead power line with an average estimated cost of US$0.10/kWh. Orla is currently working with CFE and CENACE for approval of the power line and final transmission rate costs.

 

21.2.2.3 Consumable Items

 

Operating supplies have been estimated based upon unit costs and consumption rates predicted by metallurgical tests and have been broken down by area. Freight costs are included in all operating supply and reagent estimates. Reagent consumptions have been derived from test work and from design criteria considerations. Other consumable items have been estimated by KCA based on KCA’s experience with other similar operations.

 

Operating costs for consumable items have been distributed based on tonnage and gold/silver production or smelting batches, as appropriate.

 

21.2.2.4 Heap Leach Consumables

 

Pipes, Fittings and Emitters – The heap pipe costs include expenses for broken pipe, fittings and valves, and abandoned tubing. The heap pipe costs are estimated to be US$0.03/t ore, and are based on previous detailed studies conducted by KCA on similar projects.

 

Sodium Cyanide (NaCN) – Delivered sodium cyanide is quoted at US$2.50/kg. Cyanide is primarily consumed in the heap leach at 0.35 kg/t ore.

 

Pebble Lime (CaO) – Pebble lime is consumed at an average rate pf 1.25 kg/t ore for pH control at the heap. A delivered price of US$153/t has been quoted.

 

Antiscale Agent (Scale Inhibitor) – Antiscalant consumption is based on a dosage range of 0 to 20 ppm to the suctions of the barren and pregnant pumps. A delivered price of US$2.48/kg has been used based on recent supplier quotes in KCA’s files.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-28

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

21.2.2.5 Recovery Plant Consumables

 

Filter Cloths – Filter cloths for the clarification and precipitation filter presses must be replaced periodically. It is assumed that filter cloths will be replaced three times per year for the clarification filters and once per year for the precipitation filter presses. An allowance of US$8,000 per set of filter cloths has been used for the FS based on recent information in KCA’s files.

 

Zinc – Ultra-fine zinc dust will be consumed in the recovery plant at an assumed rate of 3 kg zinc per kg of metal in solution which will vary based on recovery plant efficiencies. Merrillite zinc is quoted at US$5.00 per kg. A US$0.258/kg allowance has been added for delivery to the Project site.

 

Lead Nitrate – Lead nitrate is used to improve Merrill-Crowe recovery efficiency and is consumed at approximately 10% of the zinc consumption if required. Lead nitrate has been quoted at US$5.50/ kg. A US$0.258/kg allowance has been added for delivery to the Project site.

 

Diatomaceous Earth – Diatomaceous earth (DE) is used as a filter media in the recovery plant. DE consumption is based on one precoat per day for each of the clarification and precipitation filter presses as well as body feed to each of the filter systems. Diatomaceous earth has been quoted at US$0.91/kg. A US$0.258/kg allowance has been added for delivery to the Project site.

 

Smelting Fluxes - It has been estimated that 0.054 kg of mixed fluxes per troy ounce of precious metal produced will be required. The estimated delivered cost of these fluxes, which includes borax, silica, niter, and soda ash, is US$1.85/kg, which is based on quoted costs and assumed flux composition. A US$0.258/kg allowance has been added for delivery to the Project site.

 

21.2.2.6 Laboratory

 

Fire assaying and solution assaying of samples will be conducted in the on-site laboratory. It is estimated that approximately 150 solids assays and 100 solutions assays at US$7 and US$3 per assay, respectively, will need to be performed each day.

 

21.2.2.7 Fuel

 

Diesel fuel will be required for heavy equipment operation, vehicles and power generation at the start of the Project. Diesel is quoted at US$0.88/L, not including IVA.

 

21.2.2.8 Miscellaneous Operating & Maintenance Supplies

 

Overhaul and maintenance of equipment along with miscellaneous operating supplies for each area have been estimated as allowances based on tonnes of ore processed. The allowances for each area were developed based on published data as well as KCA’s experience with similar operations.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-29

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Maintenance and operating supplies costs are estimated at US$0.480 per tonne ore processed.

 

21.2.2.9 Mobile / Support Equipment

 

Mobile and support equipment are required for the process and include three fork lifts, one 4-t telehandler with boom extension, one 10-t boom truck, one backhoe, seven pickup trucks, one maintenance truck, one 50-t rough terrain crane and an ambulance. The costs to operate and maintain each piece of equipment have been estimated primarily using published information and project specific fuel costs. Where published information was not available, allowances were made based on KCA’s experience from similar operations.

 

Support equipment annual operating costs are estimated at US$360,000 or US$0.055 per tonne of ore. Support equipment operating costs are presented in Table 21-21.

 

Table 21-21
Support Equipment Operating Costs

 

Description Unit Qty. Unit Cost Annual Cost, US$
Fork Lift, 2.5 t h/mo 180 $6.55 $14,200
Telehandler h/mo 120 $22.95 $33,000
Boom Truck 10 t h/mo 90 $13.90 $15,000
Backhoe/loader h/mo 180 $22.15 $47,900
Pickup Trucks (7) km/d 350 $1.48 $192,500
Maintenance Truck km/d 100 $0.82 $29,900
Crane - Rough Terrain h/mo 24 $36.97 $10,600
Bobcat h/mo 180 $8.00 $17,300
TOTAL       $360,400

 

21.2.2.10 G&A Expenses

 

General and administrative expenses are expected to average US$5.8 million per year and include costs for water and land access rights, concessions, offsite offices, insurance, office supplies, communications, environmental and social management, health and safety supplies, security, travel and camp operations. For the cost estimate G&A expenses are represented primarily as fixed costs or have been structured based on existing agreements between Orla and the surrounding communities. Fixed G&A expenses are presented in Table 21-22. Total G&A expenses by year are presented in Table 21-23.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-30

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-22
Fixed G&A Expenses

 

Description Basis Total Annual Cost, US$  
 
Maintenance Supplies 5% of G&A Staff / Labor $128,000  
Office Supplies/Subscriptions 7.5% of G&A Staff / Labor $192,000  
Transportation 12 x $10000/month $120,000  
Vehicles Replace 1 Vehicles/Year $45,000  
Vehicle OPEX 12 @ 100 km/day @ $0.63/km $276,000  
Mancamp CH Lunch Quote, 200 persons $2,905,400  
Crew Rotations Included above    
Off Site Office Allowance $120,000  
Public Relations Expense 12% of G&A Staff / Labor $307,000  
Communications 3% of G&A Staff / Labor $77,000  
Insurance Allowance $150,000  
Safety Supplies Allowance $25,000  
Environmental Monitoring / Reporting, Permits Allowance $200,000  
Training Supplies Allowance $25,000  
Outside Audit (Accounting, Metallurgy, etc.) Allowance $75,000  
Travel 15 Trips @ $3000/Trip $45,000  
Legal Allowance $150,000  
CSR Budget   $385,000  
CSR Annual Report   $75,000  
IT, Internet, Software, computers Allowance $100,000  
Access Road Maintenance Allowance $25,000  
Waste Management Allowance $100,000  
Equipment Rentals Allowance $25,000  
Medical Supplies Allowance $20,000  
Property Tax Allowance    
Miscellaneous Allowance $200,000  
Sub-Total   $5,771, 000  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

21.0 Capital & Operating Costs

Page 21-31

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 21-23
G&A Expenses by Year

 

  Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7
Fixed Expenses $5,771,000 $5,771,000 $5,771,000 $5,771,000 $5,771,000 $5,771,000 $5,771,000
San Tiburcio Social Contribution $680,000 $714,000 $749,000 $787,000 $826,000 $867,000 $911,000
Other Social Commitments $44,000 $46,000 $48,000 $50,000 $53,000 $56,000 $58,000
Water Rights $848,000 $500,000 $848,000 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0
Water Usage $121,000 $121,000 $121,000 $121,000 $121,000 $121,000 $121,000
Concessions $143,000 $143,000 $143,000 $143,000 $143,000 $143,000 $143,000
Total $7,606,000 $7,294,000 $7,680,000 $7,372,000 $6,914,000 $7,458,000 $7,004,000

 

21.3 Reclamation & Closure Costs

 

A cost estimate for reclamation and closure was made by KCA with input from IMC. Costs for reclamation and closure are based on a 3-year closure period (plus on going monitoring) and are summarized in Table 21-24 and includes work to be conducted from the closure of the mine, end of operation activities and concurrent rehabilitation work, excluding G&A costs during closure. G&A costs during closure are estimated at US$8.8 million and are included in the operating costs estimate.

 

The main objectives of the reclamation and closure plan include:

 

· Progressive rehabilitation to allow rapid recovery of the vegetation cover and early recovery of the ecosystem;
· Sustainability of rehabilitation work including water and wind erosion;
· Recovery of land uses; and
· Implementation of a post-closure monitoring program.

 

Activities included as part of reclamation and closure are described in Section 20 of this Report.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 21.0 Capital & Operating Costs
June, 2019 Page 21-32

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Table 21-24
Reclamation and Closure Cost Summary

 

Description Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Total
Closure Plan (Regulatory Approval) $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Topsoil/Revegetation of Preg/Excess Pond (Haulage/Placement) $0 $0 $0 $76,000 $25,000 $101,000
Topsoil/Revegetation of Waste Dump $334,000 $37,000 $0 $0 $0 $371,000
Topsoil/Revegetation of Heap Leach Pad $0 $0 $0 $143,000 $143,000 $287,000
Regrade of Heap Leach Pad $0 $0 $0 $217,000 $217,000 $434,000
Leach Pad Waste Cover $0 $0 $0 $574,000 $574,000 $1,148,000
Water Control Infrastructure $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000
Pregnant Pond Partial Fill $0 $0 $0 $102,000 $0 $102,000
Excess Pond Partial Fill $0 $0 $0 $251,000 $84,000 $335,000
Pond Drainage Revision $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Demolish/Removal Mine Infrastructure and Camp $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Building Slabs (Bury In-Place or to Heap/Ponds) $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $50,000
Crushers / MC plant $0 $352,000 $0 $220,000 $0 $572,000
Remediation of disturbed areas $0 $0 $54,000 $27,000 $9,000 $89,000
Remediation of hydrocarbon affected areas $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $0 $12,000
Hazardous Waste Removal $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
Remediation of Chemical Affected Areas $0 $0 $0 $59,000 $20,000 $79,000
Reclaim Tunnel Closure $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Access Road Closure to Restricted Areas $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,000 $66,000
Removal of Haul Road $0 $0 $0 $0 $508,000 $508,000
Monitoring of Mine for 10 years $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Labor $121,000 $241,000 $1,207,000 $483,000 $362,000 $2,414,000
Heap Rinsing & Neutralization $0 $1,464,000 $4,881,000 $2,441,000 $976,000 $9,763,000
Support Services $0 $98,000 $196,000 $98,000 $98,000 $489,000
Contingency (15%) $83,000 $336,000 $962,000 $711,000 $492,000 $2,584,000
             
Total (excluding G&A) $638,000 $2,579,000 $7,375,000 $5,448,000 $3,774,000 $19,813,000

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 21.0 Capital & Operating Costs
June, 2019 Page 21-33

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

22.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

 

22.1 Summary

 

Based on the estimated production schedule, capital costs and operating costs, a cash flow model was prepared by KCA for the economic analysis of the Project. All of the information used in this economic evaluation has been taken from work completed by KCA and other consultants working on this Project as described in previous sections of this Report.

 

The Project economics were evaluated using a discounted cash flow (DCF) method, which measures the Net Present Value (NPV) of future cash flow streams. The results of the economic analyses represent forward-looking information as defined under Canadian securities law. The results depend on inputs that are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those presented here.

 

The final economic model was developed by KCA based on the following assumptions:

 

· The cash flow model is based on the mine production schedule from IMC.
· The period of analysis is twelve years including two year of investment and pre-production, seven years of production and three years for reclamation and closure.
· Gold price of US$1,250/oz.
· Silver prize of US$17/oz.
· Processing rate of 18,000 tpd.
· Overall recoveries of 64% for gold and 17% for silver.
· Capital and operating costs as developed in Section 21.0 of this Report.

 

The key economic parameters are presented in Table 22-1 and the economic summary is presented in Table 22-2.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 22-1

Key Economic Parameters

 

Item Value unit
Au Price 1,250 US$/oz
Ag Price 17 US$/oz
Au Avg. Recovery 64 %
Ag Avg. Recovery 17 %
Treatment Rate 18,000 tpd
Refining & Transportation Cost, Au 1. 40 US$/oz
Refining & Transportation Cost, Ag 1.20 US$/oz
Payable Factor, Au 99.9 %
Payable Factor, Ag 98.0 %
     
Annual Produced Au, Avg. 97 koz
Annual Produced Ag, Avg. 511 koz
Income & Corporate Tax Rate 30 %
Special Mining Tax Rate 7.5 %
Royalties    
     Mine Claim (Newmont) 2.0  %
     Extraordinary Mining Duty 0.5

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 22-2

Economic Analysis Summary

 

Production Data    
Life of Mine 6.8 Years
Mine Throughput per day 18,000 Tonnes Ore /day
Mine Throughput per year 6,570,000 Tonnes Ore /year
Total Tonnes to Crusher 44,020,000 Tonnes Ore
Grade Au (Avg.) 0.73 g/t
Grade Ag (Avg.) 14.2 g/t
Contained Au oz 1,031,000 Ounces
Contained Ag oz 20,093,000 Ounces
Metallurgical Recovery Au (Overall) 64%  
Metallurgical Recovery Ag (Overall) 17%  
Average Annual Gold Production 97,000 Ounces
Average Annual Silver Production 511,000 Ounces
Total Gold Produced 662,000 Ounces
Total Silver Produced 3,479,000 Ounces
LOM Strip Ratio (W:O) 0.54  
Operating Costs (Average LOM)    
Mining $2.14 /Tonne mined
Mining (processed) $3.30 /Tonne Ore processed
Processing & Support $3.38 /Tonne Ore processed
G&A $1.75 /Tonne Ore processed
          Total Operating Cost $8.43 /Tonne Ore processed
Total By-Product Cash Cost $515 /Ounce Au
All-in Sustaining Cost $576 /Ounce Au
Capital Costs (Excluding IVA and Closure)    
Initial Capital $123 million
LOM Sustaining Capital $20 million
          Total LOM Capital $144 million
Working Capital & Initial Fills $10 million
Closure Costs $20 million
Financial Analysis    
Gold Price Assumption $1,250 /Ounce
Silver Price Assumption $17 /Ounce
Average Annual Cashflow (Pre-Tax) $72 million
Average Annual Cashflow (After-Tax) $56 million
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pre-Tax 38.6%  
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax 28.7%  
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax) $227 million
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax) $142 million
Pay-Back Period (Years based on After-Tax) 3.0 Years

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

22.2 Methodology

 

The Camino Rojo Project economics are evaluated using a discounted cash flow method. The DCF method requires that annual cash inflows and outflows are projected, from which the resulting net annual cash flows are discounted back to the Project evaluation date. Considerations for this analysis include the following:

 

· The cash flow model has been developed by KCA with input from Orla.
· The cash flow model is based on the mine production schedule from IMC.
· Gold and silver production and revenue in the model are delayed from the time ore is stacked based on the mine production schedule and leach curves to account for time required for metal values to be recovered from the heap.
· The period of analysis is twelve years including two years of investment and pre-production, seven years of production and three years for reclamation and closure.
· All cash flow amounts are in US dollars (US$). All costs are considered to be 1st quarter 2019 costs. Inflation is not considered in this model with the exception of inflationary adjustment on depreciation pool balances as permitted under Mexican law.
· The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is calculated as the discount rate that yields a zero Net Present Value (NPV).
· The NPV is calculated by discounting the annual cash back to Year -2 at different discount rates. All annual cash flows are assumed to occur at the end of each respective year.
· The payback period is the amount of time, in years, required to recover the initial construction capital cost.
· Working capital and initial fills are considered in this model and includes mining, processing and general administrative operating costs. The model assumes working capital and initial fills are recovered during the final two years of operation.
· Royalties and government taxes are included in the model.
· The model is built on an unlevered basis.
· Salvage value for process equipment is considered and is applied at the end of the Project.
· Reclamation and closure costs are included.

 

The economic analysis is performed on a before and after-tax basis in constant dollar terms, with the cash flows estimated on a project basis.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

22.2.1 General Assumptions

 

General assumptions for the model, including cost inputs, parameters, royalties and taxes are as follows:

 

· Basic and detailed engineering begins fourth quarter 2019 with site construction beginning 1st quarter 2020.
· First gold pour occurs second quarter 2021.
· Gold price of US$1,250/oz is used as the base case commodity price.
· Silver prize of US$17/oz as the base commodity price.
· Gold and silver production and revenue in the model are delayed from the time material is stacked based on the mine production schedule and material leach curves to account for time required for gold to be recovered from the heap. An additional month of delay is added beginning in Year 5 to reflect additional delays from higher lifts.
· LOM average operating costs of US$8.43/t ore including a mining cost of US$3.30/t ore (US$2.14/ tonne mined), processing cost of US$3.38/t ore and G&A cost of US$1.75/t ore.
· Pre-production capital costs for the Project are spent entirely in Years -2 and -1. Sustaining capital for the site power line is spent in Year 1. Sustaining capital for the heap leach pad expansion is spent in Year 2. Sustaining capital for evaporators for treatment of pit water is spent in Year 3. Sustaining capital for replacement of some process mobile equipment is spent in Year 4. Sustaining costs for the mine is spent in Year 7 for contractor demobilization.
· Working capital equal to 60 days of operating costs during the pre-production and ramp up period is included for mining, process and G&A costs as well as initial fills for process reagents and consumables. The assumption is made that all working capital and initial fills can be recovered in the final years of operation and the effective sum of working capital and initial fills over the life of mine is zero.
· Depreciation allowances for eligible items are included in the model based on straight line depreciation schedules including 3% annual inflation adjustment on depreciation pool balances.
· IVA is applied at 16% to all capital costs as a part of this model and is assumed to be 100% refundable the following year. IVA is not applied to operating costs.
· A 2% NSR is included for royalty agreements with mining claim owners.
· A 0.5% NSR is included and payable to the government as an “extraordinary mining duty”.
· An income tax of 30% is considered.
· A 7.5% mining tax is included and is based on EBITDA less exploration and deductible earthworks costs.
· Possibly forthcoming Zacatecas Environmental “Green Tax” is not considered.
· A refinery and transportation cost of US$1.40/oz for gold and US$1.20/oz for silver is used in the model, including insurance. Gold and silver are assumed to be 99.9% and 98% payable, respectively.
· A loss carry forward of US$252,100 (MXN$4.9 million) which includes expenses for the Project to date, but excludes current assets and inventories is included.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

· Pre-production exploration costs of US$49.1 million are considered, which includes US$24 million for the acquisition of the mining concessions. Pre-production exploration costs are assumed to be depreciable using the straight-line method over a 10-year period.
· By-product cash operating costs per payable ounce represent the mine site operating costs including mining, processing, metal transport, refining, administration costs and royalties with a credit for silver produced. Operating costs are presented in greater detail in Section 21 of this report.
· All in sustaining costs per payable ounce represent the mine site operating costs including mining, processing, metal transport, refining, administration costs and royalties with a credit for silver produced as well as the LOM sustaining capital and reclamation and closure costs.
· The cash flow analysis evaluates the Project on a stand-alone basis. No withholding taxes or dividends are included. No head office or overheads for the parent company are included.
     
22.3 Capital Expenditures

 

Capital expenditures include initial capital (pre-production or construction costs), sustaining capital and working capital. The capital expenditures are presented in detail in Section 21 of this Report.

 

The capital expenditures for the Project are summarized in Table 22-3.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 22-3

Capital Expenditures Summary 

 

Capital Item LOM Cost (US$)
Contractor Mobilization $1,130,000
Contractor Demobilization $995,000
Pre-Production Stripping $1,366,000
Owner Equipment $525,000
   
Major Earthworks $9,943,000
Liner / Materials (Supply & Install) $11,884,000
Civils (Supply & Install) $1,377,000
Structural Steel (Supply & Install) $850,000
Platework (Supply) $1,500,000
Platework (Install) $225,000
Mechanical Equipment (Supply) $33,582,000
Mechanical Equipment (Install) $5,072,000
Piping (Supply & Install) $4,927,000
Electrical (Supply) $8,654,000
Electrical (Install) $500,000
Instrumentation (Supply & Install) $936,000
Infrastructure (Supply & Install) $13,036,000
Spare Parts $1,640,000
Freight & Duties incl
   
Process Contingency $15,442,000
EPCM $8,544,000
Commissioning & Supervision $612,000
Supplier Engineering $2,117,000
Indirect Costs (incl. contingency) $9,174,000
Owner's Costs (incl. contingency) $9,506,000
   
Subtotal $143,538,000
Working Capital (Initial Fills) $806,000
Working Capital (60 days) $9,106,000
Process Preproduction $275,000
   
TOTAL (Excluding IVA) $153,725,000

 

The economic model assumes working capital and initial fills will be recovered at the end of the operation and are applied as credits against the capital cost. Working capital and initial fills are assumed to be recovered during Years 6 and 7. Salvage value for equipment is considered as taxable income and is applied during Years 8 through 10 after equipment items are no longer in service. Costs presented in Table 22-3 do not include the recovery of working capital or salvage income.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-7

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

22.4 Metal Production

 

Total metal production for the Camino Rojo oxide deposit is estimated at 662,000 ounces of recovered gold and 3.5 million ounces of recovered silver. Annual production profiles for gold and silver are presented in Figure 22-1 and Figure 22-2, respectively with 97,000 ounces of gold and 511,000 ounces being recovered annually on average.

 

 

Figure 22-1 Annual Gold Production

 

Figure 22-2 Annual Silver Production

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

22.5 Royalties

 

Royalties payable for the Camino Rojo include a 2% royalty on the mining claims to Newmont (formerly Goldcorp Inc.) and a 0.5% royalty due to the Mexican government as an “Extraordinary Mining Duty. The 2% mining claims royalty represents US$17.6 million over the life of the mine and the 0.5% extraordinary mining duty represents US$4.4 million.

 

22.6 Operating Costs

 

Operating costs were estimated by KCA for all process and support services. G&A operating costs were estimated by KCA with input from Orla. Mining costs were estimated by IMC. LOM operating costs for the Camino Rojo Project are summarized in Table 22-4. A detailed description of the operating cost build-up is included in Section 21.0 of this report.

 

Table 22-4

LOM Operating Costs

 

Description LOM Cost (US$/t Ore)
Mine $3.30
Process & Support Services $3.38
Site G & A $1.75
Total $8.43

 

22.7 Closure Costs

 

Reclamation and closure include costs for works to be conducted for the closure of the mine at the end of operations and have been estimated primarily by KCA with input from IMC for encapsulation of transition and sulphide material in the waste rock dump. The estimated LOM reclamation and closure costs is US$19.8 million, not including G&A, or US$0.45 per tonne ore processed based on a closure period of three years after the completion of operations. Reclamation and closure activities are summarized in Section 20.0 of this report and costs are summarized in Section 21.0.

 

22.8 Taxation

 

22.8.1 Value Added Tax (IVA)

 

The “Impuesto al Valor Agregado” (IVA) is a 16% value added tax applied to all goods and services and is considered to be fully refundable. For the economic model, a 16% IVA is applied to all capital costs in the year in which they occur with the IVA refund or credit being applied in the following year. IVA is not considered in the operating cost estimate as it is assumed that once in operation IVA paid vs. IVA credits will be a net zero value during the period in which they occur.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

22.8.2 Federal Income Tax

 

Federal income tax is applied at 30% of the Project income after deductions of eligible expenses including depreciation of assets, earthworks and indirect construction costs, exploration costs, special mining tax, extraordinary mining duty and any losses carried forward.

 

22.8.3 Special Mining Tax

 

The special mining duty is applied at 7.5% of the Project income after deduction of eligible exploration, earthworks and indirect costs expenses. Income subject to the special mining tax does not allow deductions for depreciation or allow losses carried forward.

 

22.8.4 Zacatecas Environmental “Green Tax”

 

A “Green Tax” was approved for the state of Zacatecas in 2017 which considers taxation of operations in order to increase tax revenue and reduce environmental impact for industrial activities. The tax is, as proposed, to be applied based on four categories:

 

· Environmental Remediation Tax on the Extraction of Materials
· Tax on Gas Emissions to the Atmosphere
· Tax on Emissions of Pollutants to the Soil, Subsoil and Water
· Tax on Disposal of Wastes

 

The environmental tax has been very controversial and is currently subject to several law suits by various existing operating companies. Further, although a proposed tax rate for each item has been proposed, it is unclear in the law how these taxes would be applied.

 

For the purposes of the Camino Rojo economic evaluation the “Green Tax” has not been included at this time as the extent to which this tax applies is unclear.

 

22.8.5 Depreciation

 

Depreciation of assets has been estimated based on a straight-line method with eligible cost items being depreciated at 10% or 12% per year based on the depreciation schedule for the specific item, including pooled costs for exploration and pre-production development of the Project. In addition to the base depreciation value, Mexican tax law allows for adjustments to the remaining depreciation pool balance for inflation. A 3% annual inflation adjustment for these tax pool balances is considered in the economic model.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-10

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

All earthworks and indirect construction costs are assumed to be 100% depreciable in the year in which the expense occurred.

 

Salvage value is not considered for the depreciation value of capital items, as salvage is considered as taxable income in the model

 

A detailed list of items considered for the depreciation and tax pools is presented in Table 22-5.

 

Table 22-5
Depreciation and Pre-Production Tax Pools

 

  MXN USD
 Category Total Total
 Mine Concession acquisition costs 462,834,000 23,981000
 Royalty acquisition cost 207,266,000 10,739,000
 Project exploration costs & expected 2019 spending 484,494,000 25,103,000
 Operating tax loss carry fwd. 4,866,000 252,000
 Subtotal 1,159,460, 000 60,076,000
 VAT 105,850,000 5,484,000
 Total 1,265,310,000 65,560,000

 

22.8.6 Loss Carry Forward

 

The Mexican tax law allows for the carry-forward of operating losses for the development of a property. The loss carry-forward is estimated at US$252,100 (MXN$4.9 million) which is based on the 2018 and estimated 2019 tax return for Minera Camino Rojo and are included in Table 22-5.

 

22.9 Economic Model & Cash Flow

 

The discounted cash flow model for the Camino Rojo Project is presented in Table 22-6 and is based on the inputs and assumptions detailed in this Section.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 22.0 Economic Analysis
June, 2019 Page 22-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 22-6
Cashflow Model Summary

 

          Year 1 Year 2                
ITEM UNITS TOTAL Year -2 Year -1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10
TOTAL MINED                                        
Leachable Tonnes   44,020,000   103,000 1,009,000 1,645,000 1,642,000 1,956,000 1,712,000 1,774,000 1,890,000 1,778,000 8,307,000 7,836,000 7,230,000 6,215,000 923,000      
     Au, g/t   0.73   0.70 0.76 0.72 0.53 0.63 0.58 0.71 0.61 0.78 0.66 0.77 0.82 0.81 0.80      
     Ag, g/t   14.20   11.66 9.81 10.80 9.32 10.56 9.56 11.58 10.22 11.62 12.09 14.55 16.62 20.77 21.19      
Waste Mined   23,728,000   497,000 1,671,000 1,655,000 1,654,000 1,344,000 1,588,000 1,527,000 1,409,000 1,523,000 4,471,000 2,437,000 1,904,000 1,983,000 65,000      
Total Mined   67,748,000   600,000 2,680,000 3,300,000 3,296,000 3,300,000 3,300,000 3,301,000 3,299,000 3,301,000 12,778,000 10,273,000 9,134,000 8,198,000 988,000      
Strip Ratio (W:O)   0.54   4.83 1.66 1.01 1.01 0.69       0.86 0.54 0.31 0.26 0.32 0.07      
Ore Processed to Heap Leach 44,020,000   63,000 859,000 1,645,000 1,642,000 1,644,000 1,643,000 1,645,000 1,642,000 1,642,000 6,569,000 6,570,000 6,570,000 6,570,000 5,316,000      
               Au grade 0.73   0.72 0.87 0.72 0.53 0.70 0.60 0.74 0.66 0.82 0.76 0.86 0.87 0.78 0.36      
               Ag grade 14.20   11.67 10.31 10.80 9.32 11.09 9.67 11.99 10.58 11.99 12.86 15.55 17.28 20.12 11.10      
  cont oz Au 1,031,000   1,400 24,000 38,200 28,000 36,900 31,500 39,200 35,000 43,300 160,000 181,900 184,300 165,200 62,200      
  cont oz Ag 20,092,735   23,600 284,800 571,300 492,100 586,200 510,900 633,900 558,800 633,200 2,715,600 3,284,000 3,651,000 4,250,300 1,896,900      
Total Ore Processed, kt 44,020   63 859 1,645 1,642 1,644 1,643 1,645 1,642 1,642 6,569 6,570 6,570 6,570 5,316      
Au, g/t 0.73   0.72 0.87 0.72 0.53 0.70 0.60 0.74 0.66 0.82 0.76 0.86 0.87 0.78 0.36      
Ag, g/t 14.20   11.67 10.31 10.80 9.32 11.09 9.67 11.99 10.58 11.99 12.86 15.55 17.28 20.12 11.10      
contained Au, kg 32,065   45 746 1,188 872 1,146 980 1,218 1,088 1,347 4,977 5,656 5,731 5,137 1,934      
contained Ag, kg 624,944   735 8,857 17,770 15,307 18,232 15,891 19,716 17,380 19,695 84,462 102,143 113,558 132,198 59,001      
Recoverable Gold, kg 20,598   32 504 798 584 778 655 827 742 926 3,434 3,884 3,647 2,701 1,086      
Total Recoverable Gold, kg 20,598   32 504 798 584 778 655 827 742 926 3,434 3,884 3,647 2,701 1,086      
Total Recoverable Gold, koz 662   1.0 16.2 25.7 18.8 25.0 21.0 26.6 23.8 29.8 110.4 124.9 117.2 86.8 34.9      
Ultimate Recovery, Au   64%   70% 68% 67% 67% 68% 67% 68% 68% 69% 69% 69% 64% 53% 56%      
Recoverable Silver, kg 108,198   81 1,032 2,123 1,849 2,134 1,922 2,285 2,009 2,251 9,508 12,316 22,256 37,143 11,290      
Total Recoverable Silver, kg 108,198   81 1,032 2,123 1,849 2,134 1,922 2,285 2,009 2,251 9,508 12,316 22,256 37,143 11,290      
Total Recoverable Silver, koz 3,479   2.6 33.2 68.3 59.4 68.6 61.8 73.5 64.6 72.4 305.7 396.0 715.6 1,194.2 363.0      
Ultimate Recovery, Ag   17%   11% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 12% 20% 28% 19%      
Recoverable Gold Delayed, oz     1,000 9,800 13,100 6,400 13,400 8,900 11,300 10,200 12,700 11,800 12,300 21,300 15,800   0 0 0
Recoverable Silver Delayed, oz       2,600 24,500 38,900 36,600 39,600 38,100 43,000 37,700 41,600 42,800 52,900 155,100 258,900   0 0 0
Total Gold Produced, oz 662,000   0 7,400 22,400 25,500 18,000 25,600 24,200 25,000 27,200 111,300 124,400 108,200 92,400 50,700 0 0 0
Total Silver Produced, oz 3,479,000   0 11,300 53,800 61,800 65,600 63,300 68,600 69,900 68,500 304,500 385,900 613,300 1,090,400 621,900 0 0 0
Realized Recovery, Au       0% 29% 47% 60% 57% 62% 62% 63% 63% 65% 65% 64% 63% 64% 64% 64% 64%
Realized Recovery, Ag       0% 4% 7% 9% 10% 10% 10% 11% 11% 11% 11% 12% 15% 16% 16% 16% 16%
TOTAL EQUIVALENT Au oz PRODUCED 710,000   0 7,600 23,100 26,300 18,800 26,400 25,100 26,000 28,200 115,500 129,600 116,600 107,200 59,200 0 0 0
Gold payable, oz 662,000   0 7,400 22,400 25,500 17,900 25,500 24,200 25,000 27,200 111,300 124,300 108,100 92,300 50,700 0 0 0
silver payable, oz 3,409,000   0 11,100 52,700 60,500 64,300 62,000 67,200 68,500 67,100 298,400 378,200 601,000 1,068,600 609,500 0 0 0
equivalent Au payable oz 708,000   0 7,600 23,100 26,300 18,800 26,400 25,100 25,900 28,100 115,300 129,400 116,300 106,800 59,000 0 0 0
                                        Refining & Transportation Charge 5,902,146   $0 $24,000 $95,900 $109,800 $103,800 $111,800 $116,100 $118,900 $120,300 $521,300 $637,300 $887,500 $1,437,800 $817,300 $0 $0 $0
NET REVENUE   $880,045,000 $0 $0 $9,426,000 $28,775,000 $32,737,000 $23,410,000 $32,878,000 $31,258,000 $32,283,000 $35,031,000 $143,616,000 $161,139,000 $144,513,000 $132,096,000 $72,883,000 $0 $0 $0
OPERATING COSTS                                        
Mining Cost $3.30 $145,225,000 $0 $0 $5,510,000 $6,594,000 $6,536,000 $6,540,000 $6,572,000 $6,572,000 $6,572,000 $6,572,000 $26,065,000 $21,424,000 $19,351,000 $17,951,000 $8,965,000 $0 $0 $0
Processing Cost $3.38 $148,728,000 $0 $0 $4,272,000 $7,032,000 $7,022,000 $7,029,000 $5,176,000 $5,181,000 $5,174,000 $5,174,000 $20,949,000 $21,097,000 $21,320,000 $21,700,000 $17,604,000 $0 $0 $0
G&A Cost $1.75 $77,202,000 $0 $0 $2,511,000 $2,511,000 $2,511,000 $2,511,000 $2,434,000 $2,434,000 $2,434,000 $2,434,000 $10,120,000 $9,812,000 $9,354,000 $9,898,000 $9,444,000 $3,476,000 $2,659,000 $2,659,000
TOTAL OPERATING COSTS   $371,155,000 $0 $0 $12,293,000 $16,138,000 $16,069,000 $16,080,000 $14,182,000 $14,187,000 $14,180,000 $14,180,000 $57,134,000 $52,333,000 $50,025,000 $49,549,000 $36,013,000 $3,476,000 $2,659,000 $2,659,000
TAXES                                        
Specialty Mining Tax   $37,107,000 $0 $0 -$229,000 $905,000 $1,201,000 $515,000 $1,353,000 $1,233,000 $1,309,000 $1,353,000 $6,271,000 $7,919,000 $6,870,000 $5,945,000 $2,463,000 $0 $0 $0
Income Tax Payable   $78,478,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,149,000 $3,464,000 $16,738,000 $22,609,000 $18,560,000 $14,957,000 $0 $0 $0 $0

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 22.0 Economic Analysis
June, 2019 Page 22-12

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

TOTAL TAXES   $115,584,000 $0 $0 -$229,000 $905,000 $1,201,000 $515,000 $1,353,000 $1,233,000 $3,458,000 $4,818,000 $23,008,000 $30,528,000 $25,430,000 $20,902,000 $2,463,000 $0 $0 $0
CAPITAL COSTS                                        
Mine Costs   $4,017,000 $0 $3,022,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $995,000 $0 $0 $0
Major Earthworks   $9,943,000 $3,093,000 $5,093,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,756,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Liner / Materials (Supply & Install)   $11,884,000 $0 $7,417,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,467,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Civils (Supply & Install)   $1,377,000 $0 $1,377,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Structural Steel (Supply & Install)   $850,000 $0 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Platework (Supply)   $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Platework (Install)   $225,000 $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Mechanical Equipment (Supply)   $33,582,000 $2,144,000 $27,037,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,473,000 $2,635,000 $294,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Mechanical Equipment (Install)   $5,072,000 $0 $4,897,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Piping (Supply & Install)   $4,927,000 $0 $4,927,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Electrical (Supply)   $8,654,000 $0 $2,829,000 $0 $5,825,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Electrical (Install)   $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Instrumentation (Supply & Install)   $936,000 $0 $936,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Infrastructure (Supply & Install)   $13,036,000 $1,760,000 $11,277,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Spare Parts   $1,640,000 $0 $1,640,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Process Contingency   $15,442,000 $0 $12,638,000 $0 $874,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,492,000 $395,000 $44,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
EPCM   $8,544,000 $1,709,000 $6,835,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Commissioning & Supervision   $612,000 $0 $612,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Supplier Engineering   $2,117,000 $0 $2,117,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Indirect Costs (incl. contingency)   $9,174,000 $1,835,000 $7,339,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Owner's Costs (incl. contingency)   $9,506,000 $1,901,000 $7,605,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal   $143,538,000 $12,442,000 $110,673,000 $0 $6,699,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,362,000 $3,030,000 $338,000 $0 $0 $995,000 $0 $0 $0
Working Capital (Initial Fills)   $806,000 $0 $806,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Working Capital (60 days)   $9,106,000 $0 $9,106,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Process Preproduction   $275,000 $0 $275,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Less: Working Capital Recovery   $10,187,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,396,000 $6,791,000 $0 $0 $0
Net Working Capital   $0 $0 $10,187,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$3,396,000 -$6,791,000 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal   $143,538,000 $12,442,000 $120,860,000 $0 $6,699,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,362,000 $3,030,000 $338,000 $0 -$3,396,000 -$5,796,000 $0 $0 $0
IVA 16% $22,966,000 $1,991,000 $17,708,000 $0 $1,072,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,498,000 $485,000 $54,000 $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0 $0
Less: IVA (Rebate)   $22,966,000 $0 $1,991,000 $0 $0 $0 $17,708,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,072,000 $1,498,000 $485,000 $54,000 $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0
Net IVA   $0 $1,991,000 $15,717,000 $0 $1,072,000 $0 -$17,708,000 $0 $0 $0 $426,000 -$1,013,000 -$431,000 -$54,000 $0 $159,000 -$159,000 $0 $0
Subtotal   $143,538,000 $14,432,000 $136,577,000 $0 $7,771,000 $0 -$17,708,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,788,000 $2,017,000 -$93,000 -$54,000 -$3,396,000 -$5,637,000 -$159,000 $0 $0
Reclamation & Closure $0.45 $19,813,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $638,000 $2,579,000 $7,375,000 $5,448,000 $3,774,000
TOTAL CAPITAL   $163,351,000 $14,432,000 $136,577,000 $0 $7,771,000 $0 ($17,708,000) $0 $0 $0 $9,788,000 $2,017,000 ($93,000) ($54,000) ($2,758,000) ($3,058,000) $7,216,000 $5,448,000 $3,774,000
PRE-TAX NET CASH FLOW   Total Year -2 Year -1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10
Pre-tax Net Cash Flow   $345,538,000 -$14,432,000 -$136,577,000 -$2,867,000 $4,866,000 $16,668,000 $25,037,000 $18,696,000 $17,071,000 $18,104,000 $11,063,000 $84,465,000 $108,899,000 $94,542,000 $85,304,000 $39,929,000 -$10,692,000 -$8,106,000 -$6,432,000
Royalty Payable 2.00% $17,601,000 $0 $0 $189,000 $575,000 $655,000 $468,000 $658,000 $625,000 $646,000 $701,000 $2,872,000 $3,223,000 $2,890,000 $2,642,000 $1,458,000 $0 $0 $0
Extraordinary Mining Duty 0.50% $4,400,000 $0 $0 $47,000 $144,000 $164,000 $117,000 $164,000 $156,000 $161,000 $175,000 $718,000 $806,000 $723,000 $660,000 $364,000 $0 $0 $0
Salvage Value   $3,791,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,007,000 $2,015,000 $769,000
IVA Refund (Project Purchase + Pre-Prod. Exploration) $5,484,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,484,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Pre-tax Net Cash Flow   $332,812,000 -$14,432,000 -$136,577,000 -$3,103,000 $4,147,000 $15,850,000 $29,936,000 $17,874,000 $16,290,000 $17,297,000 $10,187,000 $80,875,000 $104,870,000 $90,929,000 $82,002,000 $38,106,000 -$9,684,000 -$6,092,000 -$5,664,000
     $332,812,000 -$14,432,000 -$136,577,000 $46,830,000 $61,648,000 $80,875,000 $104,870,000 $90,929,000 $82,002,000 $38,106,000 -$9,684,000 -$6,092,000 -$5,664,000
Cumulative     -$14,432,000 -$151,009,000 -$154,112,000 -$149,965,000 -$134,116,000 -$104,179,000 -$86,305,000 -$70,015,000 -$52,719,000 -$42,531,000 $38,344,000 $143,214,000 $234,143,000 $316,145,000 $354,252,000 $344,568,000 $338,476,000 $332,812,000
AFTER-TAX NET CASH FLOW                                        
     Income & Other Taxes   $115,584,000 $0 $0 -$229,000 $905,000 $1,201,000 $515,000 $1,353,000 $1,233,000 $3,458,000 $4,818,000 $23,008,000 $30,528,000 $25,430,000 $20,902,000 $2,463,000 $0 $0 $0
After-Tax net annual Cash Flow, $   $217,228,000 -$14,432,000 -$136,577,000 -$2,874,000 $3,242,000 $14,649,000 $29,422,000 $16,521,000 $15,056,000 $13,838,000 $5,370,000 $57,867,000 $74,342,000 $65,500,000 $61,100,000 $35,644,000 -$9,684,000 -$6,092,000 -$5,664,000
    $217,228,000 -$14,432,000 -$136,577,000 $44,439,000 $50,786,000 $57,867,000 $74,342,000 $65,500,000 $61,100,000 $35,644,000 -$9,684,000 -$6,092,000 -$5,664,000
TOTAL CUMULATIVE     -$14,432,000 -$151,009,000 -$153,883,000 -$150,641,000 -$135,992,000 -$106,570,000 -$90,049,000 -$74,993,000 -$61,154,000 -$55,784,000 $2,082,000 $76,424,000 $141,924,000 $203,024,000 $238,668,000 $228,984,000 $222,892,000 $217,228,000

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 22.0 Economic Analysis
June, 2019 Page 22-13

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The Camino Rojo cash flows are net of royalties and taxes. The Project yields an after-tax internal rate of return of 28.7%.

 

22.10 Sensitivity

 

To estimate the relative economic strength of the Project, base case sensitivity analyses have been completed analyzing the economic sensitivity to several parameters including changes in gold price, capital costs, average operating cash cost per tonne of ore processed and exchange rate. The sensitivities are based on +/- 25% of the base case for capital costs, operating costs and exchange rate and select gold prices. The after-tax analysis is presented in Table 22-7. Figure 22-3 and Figure 22-4 present graphical representations of the after-tax sensitivities. Variations in gold price, ore grades and recovery rates have the largest influence on the sensitivity of the Project. From these sensitivities it can be seen that the Project is economically robust.

 

The economic indicators chosen for sensitivity evaluation are the internal rate of return (IRR) and NPV at 5% discount rate.

 

Table 22-7
After-Tax Sensitivity Analysis Results

 

      NPV
  Variation IRR 5% 10%
Gold Price        
  $1,000 15.9% $59,068,000 $25,895,000
  $1,125 22.8% $101,241,000 $58,528,000
  $1,250 28.7% $141,580,000 $89,534,000
  $1,375 34.3% $182,146,000 $120,710,000
  $1,500 39.7% $222,711,000 $151,886,000
         
Capital Costs        
75% $130,013,659 38.7% $165,153,000 $112,375,000
90% $150,016,306 32.2% $151,009,000 $98,671,000
100% $163,351,404 28.7% $141,580,000 $89,534,000
110% $176,686,502 25.7% $132,151,000 $80,398,000
125% $196,689,149 21.9% $118,008,000 $66,694,000
         
Operating Costs        
75% $278,366,386 35.5% $189,191,000 $126,195,000
90% $334,039,663 31.5% $160,625,000 $104,198,000
100% $371,155,181 28.7% $141,580,000 $89,534,000
110% $408,270,699 25.9% $122,536,000 $74,870,000
125% $463,943,977 21.4% $93,317,000 $52,279,000
         
Exchange Rate        
75% 14.475 25.2% $123,861,000 $74,932,000
90% 17.37 27.5% $135,673,000 $84,666,000
100% 19.3 28.7% $141,580,000 $89,534,000
110% 21.23 29.7% $146,412,000 $93,516,000
125% 24.125 31.0% $152,208,000 $98,292,000

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-14

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 22-3 After Tax Sensitivity – IRR

 

 

 

Figure 22-4 After Tax Sensitivity – NPV @ 5%

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

22.0 Economic Analysis

Page 22-15

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

23.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES

 

There are no active exploration properties or producing mines immediately adjacent to the Camino Rojo Project.

 

The Adjacent Owner controls a mining concession adjacent to the Camino Rojo concessions that abuts the northern limit of the Represa Zone. Drillpads and drillroads were observed on this claim during Dr. Gray’s site visit, but the drilling results were unavailable to the author. Notwithstanding, the absence of confirmed information, on this basis, it is reasonable to assume that the Represa mineralized zone extends onto the Adjacent Owner’s claim, however, all interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report relate exclusively to the mining concessions that comprise the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

23.0 Adjacent Properties

Page 23-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

24.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION

 

24.1 Project Implementation

 

24.1.1 Project Development

 

The development philosophy for the Project assumes that Orla will hire an EPCM Project Management Company (PMC) to act on behalf of the owner to complete the detail engineering and project implementation. The PMC will manage and supervise the engineering consultants.

 

The PMC will also execute the following responsibilities:

 

· Procurement tasks for all equipment and supplies
· Logistics tasks
· Project controls
· Process all accounts payable documentation
· Scheduling
· Contracts management
· Project safety
· Client reporting
     
24.1.2 Project Controls

 

Standard project controls will be used during the implementation of the Camino Rojo Project. Multiple software packages are normally used to control various aspects of the following:

 

· Document control
· Tech specifications and manuals
· Project budget
· Contracts
· Purchasing
· Expediting and logistics
· Bidding process and tracking
· Change orders
· Receiving / warehousing and materials management
· Construction job cost system and interface with the accounting system
· Tracking and forecasting costs estimates to completion (“ETC”)
· Scheduling
· Safety statistics

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

A project server will be dedicated to storage and there will be controlled access to all project relevant documents.

 

Weekly progress reports and monthly cost reports of project status will be prepared and distributed.

 

24.1.3 Procurement and Logistics

 

The PMC will purchase all material for the Project on behalf of the Owner. This enables direct control over the procurement budget and schedule. The team performs equipment technical reviews and negotiations, analyses the total delivery cost, issues recommendations and produces the purchase orders or contractual documents upon owner’s approval. The team coordinates logistics and assists suppliers. Freight forwarding is managed dynamically to minimize the freight transit times and avoid transportation issues. A weekly expediting report is also generated showing the status of purchase orders and latest estimate of delivery dates for each purchase with latest status of customs clearances, etc.

 

24.1.4 Construction

 

The PMC will provide the site construction management team and supplement the site staff with resources as required. Personnel that are planned to be kept after the preproduction period and become operations key personnel will be directly hired by the owner. Lump sum contracts will be considered when practical and cost reimbursable contracts will be awarded when preferable. Early in the Project, mobile equipment will be purchased by the owner for use during the construction phase that will be turned over to the operations group shortly after commissioning. This equipment includes:

 

· 50 t all-terrain crane
· 10 t boom truck
· Forklift
· Telehandler
· Backhoe / loader
· 992 loader
· D6 dozer
· Maintenance truck

 

This equipment will be purchased new over the course of the Project as the need for each arises.

 

For the FS, quotations were received that considered all contractors bringing their own cranes. In practise, it is usually more efficient and less expensive if the owner purchases one crane and rents sufficient additional cranes for each phase of the Project. The owner can then globally manage and allocate cranes to each contractor’s activities on an as-needed basis.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The owner will contract one concrete batch plant for the site. All concrete requirements for the Project will be supplied at the owner’s cost and delivered to the various contractors.

 

The owner will provide sanitary services, domestic water and general services supply throughout the Project site at no cost to the contractors.

 

24.1.5 Construction Schedule

 

Assuming permits are awarded on schedule and there are no significant issues or set-backs, it is envisioned for the Project construction to begin in the first quarter of 2020 and commissioning and initial production to start during the first quarter of 2021 with first gold pour in the second quarter of 2021. It is expected to take approximately 17 months from the beginning of site construction to the pouring of the first doré bar. The first six of these months will include:

 

· Conclusion of detailed engineering;
· Detailed execution plan implementation;
· Camp and warehouse construction;
· Final orders for long lead-time equipment items;
· Earthworks contractor mobilization;
· Roads, culverts and building pads; and
· El Berrendo access road and powerline relocation.

 

A proposed project development and implementation schedule is presented in Figure 24-1.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 24-1 Project Development & Implementation Schedule

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

24.2 Site Geotechnical Analyses

 

Piteau conducted a number of geotechnical studies for the Project including slope stability assessments for the heap, waste dumps and pit slopes. The foundation conditions in the vicinity of the heap leach pad and the waste rock dump are based on the results of site investigation programs carried out by Piteau across the Project site in 2014, 2018 and 2019. These investigations included 74 test pits and 19 drillholes. The pit slope design is based on the results of site investigation programs carried out by Piteau in 2014, 2015 and 2018. These investigations included an additional 21 drillholes.

 

24.2.1 Heap Leach Pad Stability

 

The geometry of the heap leach pad is proposed to be developed in six lifts; each superior lift with a height of 10 metres above the underlying lift and with each lift sloping at an angle similar to the foundation. The repose angle slope of each lift of the heap material was assumed to be 39°, the assumed angle of internal friction of the ore. To allow pregnant solution to be collected, an LLDPE liner will be installed at the base of the HLP. To form a foundation for the liner and help minimize seepage into the foundation in the event of a leak in the LLDPE liner, a 30cm layer of low permeability material will be placed and compacted across the entire footprint of the HLP.

 

The details of the heap stability design can be seen in the report “Feasibility Geotechnical Assessment of the Waste Dump, Heap Leach Pad and Site Infrastructure” and is referenced is Section 27 of this report.

 

The results of the heap stability analyses indicate a stable facility at the design heights and slope angles.

 

24.3 Hydrogeology

 

Hydrogeological and groundwater investigations have been carried out at the Project site and are detailed in the following technical documents and reports:

 

· “Technical Memo – Camino Rojo Project Pump Test Summary, Well CR-01, January 2019”
· “Camino Rojo Project Production Well PW-1, April 2019”
· “Camino Rojo Project Heap Leach Area Monitor Wells, June 2019”
· “Camino Rojo Project Well Summary Report PW-2, June 2019”
· “Groundwater Flow Modeling for Projected Camino Rojo Mine Project, San Tiburcio, State of Zacatecas Mexico, June 2019”
· “Estudios Ambientales de Línea Base para el proyecto Camino Rojo”

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

The scope of work for the hydrogeological investigations was primarily focused on locating a viable water source and modeling the water level impacts from mining. Results and conclusions are based on information in the above studies which are referenced in Section 27 of this report.

 

24.3.1 Occurrence and Movement of Groundwater

 

Groundwater in the vicinity of the proposed mine occurs in the Caracol, Indidura and Cuesta del Cura Formations. The rock matrix for all of these formations has very low permeability and groundwater flow is dominated by fracture flow, or possibly flow in solution cavities in limestone units. There is little, if any, surficial evidence for karst formation in the carbonate formations such as the Cuesta del Cura Formation, however, there may be solution features at depth related to faulting.

 

In general, groundwater flow direction is often a subdued expression of topography. However, the groundwater flow pattern(s) in the vicinity of the Project and the village of San Tiburcio is complex.

 

A groundwater elevation contour map based on water levels measured in wells in and near the Project in November 2018 or later is presented in Figure 24-2. Water level elevations represent a “steady state” condition, as there was no pumping going on when water levels were measured. Water level elevations in the immediate vicinity of the proposed mine pit are low relative to wells further to the south. As depicted, groundwater flows from the village of San Tiburcio area north towards the pit area.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

 

Figure 24-2 Groundwater Elevation Contours Camino Rojo Project, Zacatecas

 

Monitor well construction in the vicinity of the proposed heap encountered water at depths as shallow as 20m (Barranca, 2019). Although these shallow depths could be indicative of a “perched zone,” water quality from shallow wells is similar to wells completed deeper in the Caracol Formation (Figure 24-3 and Table 24-1). Additional monitor well construction is planned in the vicinity of the proposed heap which should resolve whether there is a “perched zone” beneath the proposed heap or a steep gradient between this area and the proposed pit area.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-7

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Information from the coring and packer testing program conducted by Piteau indicates that there may be a vertical downward groundwater head gradient in the vicinity of the proposed pit (Piteau, 2014). The water level contours, as currently shown in Figure 24-2, are indicative of groundwater flow toward the proposed pit area from the south. One explanation for this phenomenon could be that vertical fracturing in the pit area, in combination with a downward gradient, is transmitting water downward into the Cuesta del Cura Formation along vertical fractures that could be related to either the mineralizing system or possibly the San Tiburcio Fault.

 

24.3.2 Groundwater Quality

 

Water quality analytical results for samples collected from wells on or near the COPE are summarized in Table 24-1. All chemical analyses were conducted by ALS Indequim SA de CV, of Monterey, N.L. The water quality from samples taken from wells completed in the Caracol Formation in the Project area are poor, with concentrations of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) generally exceeding 4,000 mg/l and sulphate concentrations generally above 1500 mg/l. The constituent concentrations in Table 24-1 that exceed the Mexican Regulatory potable water limit (NOM-127-SSA1-2002) are colored orange. TDS concentrations in samples from well CR-04 have generally exceeded 12,000 mg/l (Figure 24-3).

 

Because groundwater quality is poor in the region, and generally non-potable due to elevated naturally-occurring total dissolved solids, generally exceeding 2,000 mg/l (Estudios Ambientales, 2019), the local residents make extensive use of small impoundments to collect groundwater from precipitation events. These small impoundments are an important source of water for livestock. There is a small surface impoundment within the COPE along the western margin of the proposed open pit area.

 

In the village of Berrendo a relatively shallow well has been constructed at the toe of such an impoundment. Fresh water seeping from the impoundment into the groundwater is collected by the well, and is provided as a municipal supply. There is also a small reverse-osmosis plant in the village of Berrendo to treat water to potable levels. In other nearby villages, people reportedly drink bottled water

 

The water samples collected from PW-1, which derives groundwater from the Cuesta del Cura Formation, had TDS concentrations just over 1000 mg/l and sulphate concentrations between 300 and 350 mg/l. The Mexican Norm for potable water (NOM-127-SSA1-2002) for these constituents is 1000 mg/l and 400 mg/l, respectively. This indicates water quality in the Cuesta del Cura is distinctive from the water quality in the Caracol. The initial water samples from the monitor wells near the proposed heap (MP-1 and MP-2) also had high TDS concentrations.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-8

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Table 24-1

Summary of Groundwater Quality Analyses from On-Site (COPE) Wells

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-9

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Summary of Groundwater Quality Analyses from On-Site (COPE) Wells cont.

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-10

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 24-3 Total Dissolved Solids in Groundwater

 

24.3.3 Drilling and Aquifer Testing

 

A test drilling program was undertaken in order to identify possible location(s) for construction of water supply well(s). The test drilling program included the drilling of 14 test borings in the COPE, using the reverse-circulation air (RC) drilling method. In general, the drilling results from boreholes drilled in the Caracol Formation were not encouraging, excepting for CR-01 drilled by Goldcorp. An aquifer test of this hole (completed in the Caracol Formation within the boundary of the proposed pit) indicated that significant quantities of water could be withdrawn from wells in fractured portions of the Caracol (Barranca, 2019).

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-11

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

A number of holes were drilled in the vicinity of CR-01, in an attempt to intersect the fracture systems that may be supplying water to this hole. Water production from these holes was not encouraging, suggesting that major water bearing structures in the Caracol Formation may be concentrated in the deposit.

 

A test boring in the extreme northeast of the COPE (CRW18-13) encountered the Cuesta del Cura Formation at a relatively shallow depth, and there appeared to be significant water production from this formation. It was decided to drill and construct a test production well at this location (Barranca, 2019). The seven-day pumping test conducted at PW-1 indicated that the well will be capable of delivering the 24 L/s of water needed for the Project. Based on the pumping test results, the maximum long-term production at PW-1 is approximately 32 L/s.

 

Even though PW-1 has been determined to be able to provide a sufficient water supply for the project, additional back up well capacity will need to be developed.

 

24.3.4 Computer Modeling of Effects of Proposed Groundwater Withdrawal

 

John Ward of Tucson Arizona (AIPG Certified Professional Geologist) was engaged to model the effects of proposed groundwater withdrawal (Ward, 2019). Specifically, the computer model was used to simulate:

 

· The water level change due to withdrawal of groundwater to be used by the proposed mining operation for process water, dust control, etc.;
· The effects of withdrawing groundwater from the pit as it advances to greater depth; and,
· The long-term impact of groundwater forming a pit-lake in the bottom of the pit after mining has ceased.

 

24.3.4.1 Summary of Computer Modeling

 

Current mining plans call for excavation of an open pit within the Caracol Formation to a depth of approximately 230 meters over an active mining period of 6.8 years. During the fourth year of pit excavation, groundwater will likely be encountered at a depth of about 110 meters, and mine pit dewatering will be required for the final three years of active mining.

 

The groundwater model was developed encompassing approximately 1,200 square kilometers of the Cretaceous aquifer within portions of the El Cardito and Guadalupe Garzarón administrative basins. The simulation of groundwater flow assumed that the aquifer is currently in equilibrium with respect to recharge and discharge, as groundwater development appears to be minimal.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-12

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Many of the wells in the area are shallow dug or drilled wells. Within the modeled area groundwater normally flows both easterly into a groundwater sink in the Guadalupe Garzarón basin; and northwesterly in the El Cardito basin. At the Project site groundwater has a more northerly component; piezometers installed at various depths at the proposed pit site indicate a downward hydraulic gradient.

 

Model calibration to regional conditions was based on published groundwater levels, aquifer test results, and groundwater flow estimates. Project site test results were used to help define the aquifer properties and constrain the dewatering simulations. The overall calibration is considered reasonable.

 

Two dewatering scenarios were developed that would encompass the known range of measured Project site hydrologic properties. The “nominal” case modeled dewatering based on regionally averaged aquifer conditions. The “low K” case modeled the same dewatering using lower hydraulic conductivity in the vicinity of the mine pit, based on results of additional Project site testing which indicated areas of lower hydraulic conductivity. Both cases simulated 3-½ years of active dewatering and more than 100 years of pit recovery. Simulated maximum mine pit dewatering ranged from 49 to 99 liters/second for the low K and nominal cases, respectively during the final half-year of mining. Simulated dewatering rates over the life of mine are shown for both cases in Figure 24-4.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-13

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 24-4 Simulated Dewatering Rates from Open Pit

 

The impacts to the regional aquifer were evaluated by comparing the extent of the 1-metre decline (drawdown) in water levels due to mine dewatering. For the nominal case, the maximum extent of 1-metre drawdown averaged 8 kilometres from the mine pit, occurring about 20 years after cessation of mining, as shown in Figure 24-5. By year 50 the 1-metre drawdown extent extended only an average of 5 kilometres from the mine pit. For the low K case, the maximum extent averaged 5 kilometres from the mine pit, as shown in Figure 24-6. By year 25, the 1-metre drawdown extent averaged 2 kilometres from the mine pit.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-14

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 24-5 Maximum Extent of 1 Metre Drawdown Contour for Nominal Case

 

 

Figure 24-6 Maximum Extent of 1 Metre Drawdown Contour for Low K Case

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-15

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Recovery of groundwater levels after cessation of dewatering was simulated for both cases. Simulated pit lake water levels stabilized approximately 30 years after dewatering ceased. Regionally, the simulated stabilized water levels showed the pit lake to be a groundwater sink in terms of lateral groundwater flow. However, in some high precipitation scenarios, there is a potential for movement of low volumes of water from the pit lake into underlying units (HGL, 2019).

 

24.3.5 Model Limitations

 

The groundwater model presented herein is based on current data available. The natural variability associated with fractured hydrogeologic media preclude making definitive statements about areas not directly associated with the constructed and tested wells. Actual conditions may vary from model predictions, but are expected to be in the range described. Additional modelling should be undertaken by qualified professional as more groundwater information becomes available.

 

24.4 Sulphides

 

The oxide and transition material that is the subject of the FS is underlain by sulphide material that is amendable to milling and flotation concentration methods. The Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amendable to milling and flotation total 258.8 million tonnes at 0.88 g/t Au, 7.4 g/t Ag, 0.07% lead, and 0.26% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 7.30 million ounces gold, 61.6 million ounces of silver, 409.2 million pounds of lead, and 1.49 billion pounds of zinc. No part of this resource is considered in the Feasibility Study. However, the heap leach pad and mine waste rock dump were placed such that they would not need to be moved should a large open pit be developed to mine the sulphide material.

 

A possible process flowsheet for the sulphide material is a sequential flotation process consisting of an initial pre-flotation to remove organic carbon followed by lead flotation, zinc flotation, and pyrite/arsenopyrite flotation to recover additional precious metals. The pyrite/arsenopyrite concentrate would be oxidized to recover additional gold and silver by cyanide leaching. Payable products would be the lead concentrate, zinc concentrate, and gold/silver doré recovered from the cyanide leaching of the pyrite/arsenopyrite concentrate.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

24.0 Other Relevant Data and Information

Page 24-16

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

25.0 INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

 

25.1 Conclusions

 

The work that has been completed to date has demonstrated that the Camino Rojo open pit mine and heap leach is a technically feasible and economically viable project. The Project is conveniently located with access via Mexican highway 54 which connects the major cities of Zacatecas and Saltillo. The Project terrain is predominately flat and sufficient water for operations is available from wells located at the Project site. Required mineral, surface and water rights have been secured.

 

More specific and detailed conclusions are presented in the Sections below.

 

25.1.1 Mining

 

The Camino Rojo mine will be a conventional open pit mine. The mine plan developed as the base case for the FS has identified 44.0 million tonnes of ore at an average grade of 0.73 g/t Au and 14.2 g/t Ag. This amounts to 1.03 million contained ounces of gold and 20.1 million contained ounces of silver. The mine life is about 6.8 years and the life of mine strip ratio is 0.54 to 1, a relatively low ratio for a precious metal pit.

 

Pit operation should be relatively simple compared to most projects in Mexico. The ground in the deposit area is flat, and the haul distances to the proposed crusher and waste storage areas are only about 500m and a kilometre from the pit rim respectively.

 

25.1.2 Metallurgy and Process

 

The Project has been designed as an open-pit mine with heap leach for recovery of gold and silver from oxide and transition material. Ore will be crushed to P80 28mm, stockpiled, reclaimed and conveyor stacked onto the heap leach pad at an average rate of 18,000 tonnes/day. Stacked material will be leached using low grade sodium cyanide solution and the resulting pregnant leach solution will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe plant for the recovery of gold and silver by zinc cementation followed by drying and smelting to produce the final doré product.

 

Metallurgical test work completed indicates that the material is amenable to cyanide leaching for the recovery of precious metals with overall recoveries of 64% for gold and 17% for silver with low to moderate reagent consumptions and will produce an estimated 662,000 ounces of gold and 3.5 million ounces of silver. Cement agglomeration is not required for heap heights up to 80m with only lime being required for pH control.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

25.0 Interpretations and Conclusions

Page 25-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Potentially preg-robbing material has been identified within the Camino Rojo ore body. A significant campaign was carried out to identify the material associated with preg-robbing with results indicating that the potentially preg-rob material is only a minor component of the total material and is found primarily at depth and is associated with the transition material with almost none of the oxide showing preg-robbing tendencies. Deleterious effects from preg-robbing should be able to be mitigated with proper ore control toward the end of the project life.

 

25.1.3 Environmental and Permitting

 

Site investigations and works completed as part of the FS are intended to support and advance the permitting process for the Camino Rojo mine. Baseline environmental studies required for permitting have been completed with continued and ongoing monitoring in progress. Submission of MIA and CUS permitting documents to SEMARNAT is anticipated in the 3rd Quarter 2019. The Project is not located in an area with any special Federal environmental protection designation and no factors have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required Federal and State environmental permits.

 

The Project area includes five flora species with legally protected status and nine fauna species are listed as threatened or protected. In accordance with Federal laws, 100% of the protected plants will be rescued and transplanted prior to construction and qualified biologists will survey the areas to be disturbed to identify nesting areas, dens and lairs of animals present. Any animals not naturally prone to leave the area that are found will be relocated to suitable habitats elsewhere in the property area.

 

Based on the Mineral Reserves developed for this Project and results from environmental test work, the heap leach Project material has an overall neutralization potential ratio of 5 and is classified as non-acid forming, Tests completed by rinsing leached material with water indicate concentrations of metals and cyanide decreased with rinsing, and were within standards applicable to the site as presented in NOM-001-SEMARNAT-1996 (metals limits for discharge for agricultural use) and NOM-155-SEMARNAT-2007 (cyanide limits for heap leach mining) for all metals with the exception of arsenic. Results from SPLP and humidity cell tests imply that the source of the arsenic is not due to cyanide leaching, but rather weathering of the oxide and transitional ore. Consistent with this evaluation, arsenic is also elevated in the natural groundwater based on sample testing of well CR-01 in the pit area (Section 20.1.2.2). The Project considers designs and procedures to ensure that the elevated arsenic levels do not result in environmental degradation around the Project site.

 

Based on an independent assessment of social and community impacts of development of the Project completed by ERM, the Project does not put at risk the social environment of the nearby communities because the impacts can be mitigated or made positive with the implementation of a Social Management System (SMS). Orla plans to develop the Project in accordance with International Finance Corporation Performance Standards, as well as the International Council on Mining and Metals principles.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

25.0 Interpretations and Conclusions

Page 25-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Baseline environmental studies and social and community impact investigations are ongoing. Based on the information and conclusions available, there are no environmental or social reasons preventing the development of the Project.

 

25.2 Opportunities

 

25.2.1 Mining

 

If an agreement with the Adjacent Owner can be reached there is additional Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource that is amendable to heap leaching that could potentially be exploited by open pit mining and processed in the facilities proposed for this Project.

 

25.2.2 Mineral Resource

 

In addition to the Mineral Resource amenable to heap leaching, the FS has identified a Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource of sulphide material that is amenable to milling and flotation concentration of 258.8 million tonnes at 0.88 g/t Au and 7.4 g/t Ag. This amounts to 7.3 million contained ounces of gold and 61.6 million contained ounces of silver. Additional metallurgical studies will be required to support the estimated metallurgical recoveries for this material. This deeper sulphide Mineral Resource is contained on Orla property, but an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be required to exploit this by open pit mining methods. The selected heap leach pad and mine waste dump location have been situated to allow an open pit to be developed on the sulphides without requiring them to be moved.

 

25.2.3 Metallurgy and Process

 

Due to the uniform topography of the Camino Rojo property, earthworks quantities needed for elevating the haul roads to meet the required height of the primary crusher incur large capital costs. Utilizing a decoupled system (a conveyor at lower elevation to feed the crusher) would decrease initial earthworks quantities as well as fuel requirements from truck haulage throughout the life of the Project.

 

During Year 4 of operation, the pit depth will intersect the local water table. This will require pit dewatering for the remaining LOM of the Project. Recent investigation results suggest that the actual maximum dewatering rate will be lower than the estimated rate considered in this report, which would reduce both the capital and operating costs required for dewatering and for evaporation of excess pit water not utilized in mining and processing activities.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

25.0 Interpretations and Conclusions

Page 25-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Leaching cycles have been designed for 80 days, but laboratory results have shown that silver recoveries benefit from cyanide solution application beyond the 80-day period. With subsequent lifts, draindown from active lifts will result in extended leaching times on previously leached lifts. As a result of this, silver recoveries are expected to increase over the LOM of the Project.

 

25.2.4 New Mineral Zones

 

The Camino Rojo deposit occurs within a mineralized district that is highly prospective for discovery of additional deposits. New discoveries of Mineral Resources in the vicinity of the proposed mine may be accretive to project value.

 

25.3 Risks

 

25.3.1 Mining

 

The Project uses contract mining as part of the base case study. There are some specific risks related to contract mining. There is risk that the contractor may need financial assistance from the owner either in terms of cash, or loan guarantees, to procure some equipment, increasing the capital cost. Contract mining is common in Mexico and this risk can be minimized by careful evaluation of potential contractors.

 

Mining operations will eventually be conducted below the water table, probably during Year 4 of commercial operations. Estimates of pit dewatering requirements have been prepared for cost estimation purposes, but additional hydrogeological studies need to be conducted to evaluate the amount of pit inflow and the potential to keep the water from entering the pit by lowering the water table with external wells. There is a risk that the estimated pit dewatering costs may change as a result of these studies.

 

There is geotechnical risk associated with the base case mine plan that is constrained by the property boundary. Mitigation of any slope failures of the north wall could prove difficult due to lack of access to the ground to the north. The design slope angles on the north and west wall are relatively steep and assume aggressive slope reinforcement utilizing closely spaced cemented rebar dowels along the pit wall. The slope angles will be flatter than design if this system fails to work as expected. The slope angle design also assumes much of the wall will be pre-split using lightly loaded, approximate 100mm diameter blast holes, spaced 1m to 1.2m along the final pit wall. This is to maintain bench face angles of about 72o and allow safe catch bench widths. If this does not work as anticipated, or it is decided not to utilize this in some areas, the slope angles will be flatter than design. These geotechnical risks could reduce the amount of material mined and the amount of ore available for processing.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

25.0 Interpretations and Conclusions

Page 25-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

25.3.2 Metallurgy and Process

 

Carbonaceous material with preg-robbing characteristics has been identified, which may reduce overall heap performance and metal recovery if processed. In regards to gold and silver recovery the Camino Rojo deposit shows preg-robbing organic carbon as being the only significant deleterious element identified, which is primarily associated with the transition material at depth along the outer edges of the deposit. Preg robbing presents a low risk to the overall Project. A significant investigation by Orla into the preg robbing material which was reviewed by KCA indicates that preg robbing material will most likely not be encountered until later in the Project life and can be mitigated by proper ore control.

 

Evaporators for pit dewatering require a minimum operating depth in the pond for operation which is assumed to be approximately 1.5 metres, or approximately 46,500 m3 of solution. Based on the pond sizing criteria there is sufficient capacity in the event pond to accommodate this additional solution for the planned heap without any changes. However, evaporation rates of water from the pit may not consistently be as estimated which may lead to some periodic loss of pond storage.

 

There is a risk that Merrill-Crowe efficiencies may be poor, particularly during initial operations due to low pregnant solution concentrations. This may result in increased zinc consumption and delayed metal recoveries.

 

25.3.3 Access, Title and Permitting

 

The Project is subject to normal risks regarding access, title, permitting, and security. The Project has had a productive relationship with the surface owners and no extraordinary risks to Project access were discerned. Conditional upon continued compliance with annual requirements, no risk to validity of title was discerned. Conditional upon compliance with applicable regulations, permits for normal exploration activities, mine construction, and mine operation are expected to be attainable. Drug related violence, propagated by members of criminal cartels and directed against other members of criminal cartels, has occurred in the region and has affected local communities. The aggression is not directed at mining companies operating in the region and has not affected the ability of Orla or previous operators to explore the Camino Rojo property.

 

There is a risk due to a possible Federal designation of a protected biological-ecological reserve known as “Zacatecas Semiarid Desert” as a Natural Protected Area (ANP). If a designation of this ANP by the government includes the surface of the mining concession areas or ancillary work areas such as possible water well fields of Camino Rojo, this could limit the growth and continuity of the Project. Mining activities (including both exploration and exploitation), depending on the corresponding sub-zone may be carried out provided they are authorized by CONANP (National Commission on Protected Natural Areas), without prejudice of other authorizations required for their execution. Goldcorp, the prior operator of the Project, engaged in forums with government and community stakeholders, and submitted an official opinion regarding this ANP declaration to the government, with the objective of ensuring that if an ANP was created, the Camino Rojo Project would not be restricted from development. Since the time that the idea of creating an ANP was proposed there has been no formal movement on the proposal. Because the State and Municipal governments affected by the Camino Rojo Project have formally expressed opposition to creation of the ANP in the area of the Camino Rojo Project, the author believes the permitting risk is similar to that of any mining project of similar scope in North America.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

25.0 Interpretations and Conclusions

Page 25-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

25.3.4 Other Risks

 

The Project considers running a powerline from Conception Del Oro, approximately 55km from the Project site, to provide power to site early in the Project life. The application for the power line requires an investigation by CENACE to determine where the Project is allowed to connect to the grid, followed by approval from the Mexican CFE to construct the powerline. It is assumed that by Year 2 of operations power supply will be available by connecting to the national commercial grid and power generation at site will no longer be needed. There is a possibility that connection to the national grid will occur later than Year 2 and will require an extended time period of diesel power generation. This delay in access to lined power would incur additional operating costs for any duration beyond the expected date of connection to the commercial power grid. The estimated operating costs for generated power is approximately 37% more than line power.

 

An ecological tax implemented by the state Congress of Zacatecas in 2017 could have a significant impact on the economics of the Project. This tax is applied to cubic metres of material extracted during mining, square metres of material impacted by dangerous substances, tonnes of carbon dioxide produced during mining processes and tonnes of waste stored in landfills. Due to the uncertainty of application of this tax and turbulence between active mining companies and the State of Zacatecas, the long term affects and implementation of this ecological tax are currently unknown.

 

The primary Project production well (PW-1) underwent a 10,000-minute pumping test and a sustained flow of 32 L/s was maintained. However, there is a risk that the fracture system in the limestone has limited potential to provide water and that flow to the well could decrease over the life of the Project. Development of additional wells will mitigate this risk.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

25.0 Interpretations and Conclusions

Page 25-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

26.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

 

26.1 KCA Recommendations

 

This Report presents an economically robust project. Based on these results, KCA recommends the following future work in regards to process and infrastructure development:

 

· Application and approval for the power line to the project site should continue to be advanced. Estimated costs for this are approximately US$130,000 and are included in the cost estimates of the Report.
· Engage with Adjacent Property Owner to reach an agreement allowing expansion of the proposed mine pit and mineral resource.
     
26.2 RGI Recommendations

 

In addition to the continuing the exploration work already underway, RGI recommends a phased exploration program. Phase 1 consists of:

 

· 950 line-km of induced polarization (IP) geophysical surveys to seek additional mineralized zones concealed by colluvium.
· A 5,000m core drill program to evaluate the sulphide resource underlying and adjacent to the oxide and transition mineralization that is the focus of the FS, with the goal of defining mineralization that may be economically processed through a mill and flotation plant.
· A 5,000m RC drill program to test IP anomalies already identified.

 

Phase 2, which is conditional upon identification of new IP anomalies, comprises:

 

· A 5,000m RC drill program to test newly defined IP anomalies.
· A 5,000m core drilling program to evaluate the mineralized zones thus discovered.

 

The total estimated cost to complete the first phase of recommended exploration work is US$3.25 million. Conditional upon positive results from the first phase, the second phase of recommended work is estimated to cost US$1.80 million.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

26.0 Recommendations

Page 26-1

 

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

26.3 Barranca Recommendations

 

Barranca Group LLC recommends the following:

 

· Additional RC test drilling leading to the construction of one or more back up or reserve production wells which should have a pump-tested sustainable capacity of at least 15 to 20 L/s; and,
· Drilling and construction of all 5 proposed monitor wells during calendar 2019 or early 2020 in order to define the direction of groundwater movement as well as baseline water quality.

 

The estimated cost for the proposed water well drilling and development is approximately US$1.1 million and is included in the capital cost estimate of this report.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

26.0 Recommendations

Page 26-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

27.0 REFERENCES

 

Aguayo, P., (2019), Estudios Ambientales de Línea Base para el proyecto Camino Rojo.

 

Aranda-Gomez, J. L.-M.-C., 2006, El volcanismo tipo intraplaca del Cenozoico tardío en el centro y norte de México: Una revision. Boletín De La Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, 187-225.

 

Barboza-Gudiño, J. Z.-M.-R.-N., 2010, Late Triassic stratigraphy and facies from northeastern Mexico: Tectonic setting and provenance. Geosphere, 621-640.

 

Barranca Group, LLC, 2019 (January), Technical Memo – Camino Rojo Project – Pump Test Summary – Well Cr-01 – January 2019.

 

Barranca Group, LLC, 2019 (April), Camino Rojo Project – Production Well Pw-1 – April 2019.

 

Barranca Group, LLC, 2019 (June), Camino Rojo Project – Heap Leach Area Monitor Wells – June 2019.

 

Barranca Group, LLC, 2019 (June), Camino Rojo Project – Well Summary Report Pw-2 – June 2019.

 

Barrett, M., 2019 (January), Laboratory Test Results for Orla Mining Ltd Project – Camino Rojo.

 

Blanchflower, J. (2009, January 15). Technical Report on the Mineral Resources of the Camino Rojo Property. Technical report posted by the Canplats on SEDAR, January 15, 2009, 70 p: Minorex Consulting.

 

Blanchflower, K. K. (2009). Technical Report Preliminary Assessment based on Report Titled "Technical Assessment of Camino Rojo Project, Zacatecas, Mexico", prepared by Minorex Consulting Mine and Quarry Engineering Services Inc. for Canplats Resources Corporation, October 16, 2009.

 

Blue Coast Research, Ltd., 2013 (September), PJ5119 – Goldcorp Camino Rojo Represa Transition Sample Summary, Prepared for Goldcorp.

 

Buseck, P. R., 1966, Contact metamorphism and ore deposition, Concepcion del Oro, Mexico. Economic Geology, 61(1), p 97-136.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

27.0 References

Page 27-1

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Centeno-Garcia, E., 2005, Review of Upper Paleozoic and Lower Mesozoic stratigraphy and depositional environments of central and west Mexico: Constraints on terrane analysis and paleogeography. The Mojave-Sonora megashear hypothesis: Development, assessment, and alternatives: Geological Society of America Special Paper 393, Anderson, T.H., Nourse, J.A., McKee, J.W., and Steiner, M.B., eds., 233-258.

 

CONANP., 2014, Estudio previo justificativo para la declaratoria como Area Natural Protegida Reserva de la Biosfera Desierto Semiarido de Zacatecas. Mexico City, Mexico: Comision Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas.

 

Cruz-Gámez, E. V.-T.-F.-S.-D., 2017, Volcanic sequence in Late Triassic – Jurassic siliciclastic and evaporitic rocks from Galeana, NE Mexico. Geologica Acta: an international earth science journal, 89-106.

 

Ernst & Young, 2017, (May), Metals Tax Summary, Mexico - Mining and Metals Tax Guide.

 

Goldcorp, 2016 (September), Pre-Feasibility Study Report, Camino Rojo Project, San Tiburcio, Zacatecas, Mexico.

 

Goldcorp Inc., 2017, (March), Goldcorp Annual Information Form for the Financial Year Ending 31 December 2016.

 

Gray, M. D., 2016 (December), Site Visit Report, Camino Rojo Gold Project (Goldcorp), Zacatecas, Mexico, Prepared for Orla Mining Ltd. Rio Rico, Arizona, USA: Resource Geosciences Inc.

 

Gray, M. D, 2018, CSA NI43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipio of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico. Rio Rico, AZ: Resource Geosciences Inc.

 

Hawkins, D., 2018, Groundwater Conditions – Camino Rojo Project. Tucson, Arizona: Barranca Group LLC.

 

Hazen Research Inc., 2014, Camino Rojo Project Variability Study. Golden, Colorado: Hazen Research Inc.

 

Heiras, M., 2017 (June), Legal opinion letter. Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico: Heiras y Asociados S.C. Abogados.

 

Heiras, M., 2018 (January), Letter report, Camino Rojo permitting for exploration and Ejido relations. Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico: Heiras y Asociados S.C., Abogados.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

27.0 References

Page 27-2

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Heiras, M., 2019 (July), Legal opinion letter. Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico: Heiras y Asociados S.C. Abogados.

 

Huss, C., M3, 2012 (August), Camino Rojo Project Technical Report Prefeasibility Study, Zacatecas, Mexico, Document No. M3-PN100113, Prepared for Goldcorp.

 

HydroGeoLogica Incorporated, 2019 (January), Final Sampling and Analysis Plan for Supplemental Geochemical Characterization, Camino Rojo Project.

 

HydroGeoLogica Incorporated, 2019 (April), Camino Rojo Supplemental Geochemical Characterization Program – Interim Report.

 

HydroGeoLogica Incorporated, 2019 (June), Preliminary Closure Plan for the Camino Rojo Heap Leach Pad.

 

HydroGeoLogica Incorporated, 2019 (June), Draft – Camino Rojo Pit Lake Evaluation Report.

 

Independent Mining Consultants, Inc., 2018 (December), Core versus RC Drilling Memo.

 

Independent Mining Consultants, Inc., 2018 (April), Camino Rojo Mine Production Schedule – Constrained Case.

 

Independent Mining Consultants, Inc., 2018 (April), Waste Details – 18,000 TPD Constrained Schedule.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2010 (April), Camino Rojo Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work, Prepared for Mine and Quarry Engineering Services, Inc.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2012 (May), Camino Rojo Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work, Prepared for Goldcorp.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2014 (October), Camino Rojo Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work, Prepared for Goldcorp.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2015 (August), Camino Rojo Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work, Prepared for Goldcorp.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2019 (June), Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Capital Cost Details.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

27.0 References

Page 27-3

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2019 (June), Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study Equipment List.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2019 (June), Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study Process Design Criteria.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2019 (June), Camino Rojo Project Kp, Ki, TrSx(H), TrHi and TrLo Composites Report of Metallurgical Test Work.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2019 (June), Project Feasibility Study on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico

 

Longo, A., 2017, Review of the exploration data for Camino Rojo, Orla Mining Ltd., private company report. Reno, NV.

 

Longo, A.A., Edwards, J., 2017, Camino Rojo: Observations leading to a new geologic model, and breccia modelling issues, private company report, Prepared for Orla Mining Ltd. Reno, NV.

 

Loza-Aguirre, I. N., 2008, Relaciones estratigráfico-estructurales en la intersección del sistema de fallas San Luis-Tepehuanes y el graben de Aguascalientes, México central, pp. 533-548.

 

Loza-Aguirre, I. N.-S.-Á.-O., 2012, Cenozoic volcanism and extension in northwestern Mesa Central, Durango, México. Boletín De La Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, 243-263.

 

Meinert, L.D., Dipple, G.M., and Nicolescu, S., 2005, World Skarn Deposits. In J. T. Hedenquist, Economic Geology One Hundredth Anniversary Volume 1905 - 2005. (p. 1136). Littleton, CO: Society of Economic Geologists, Inc.

 

Mine Development Associates, 2011 (June), Camino Rojo - A Comparison of Goldcorp and Canplats Drill Results.

 

Mitre-Salazar, L., 1989, La megafalla Laramídica de San Tiburcio, estado de Zacatecas. Univ. Nacional Autón. México, Inst. Geologia Revista, 47-51.

 

NewFields Servicios de México, 2019 (February), Diseño Conceptual de Manejo de Aguas Pluviales y Control de Sedimentacion Proyecto Minero Camino Rojo San Tiburcio, Zacatecas Mexico.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

27.0 References

Page 27-4

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

NewFields Servicios de México, 2019 (February), Ingeniería Conceptual Para Manejo de Aguas Pluviales y Control de Sedimentación Proyecto Minero Camino Rojo.

 

NewFields Servicios de México, 2019 (February), Revision y Calculo de Precipitacion Pluvial del Proyecto Camino Rojo Proyecto Minero Camino Rojo San Tiburcio, Zacatecas Mexico.

 

Nieto-Samaniego, A. A.-Á., 2007, Mesa Central of México: Stratigraphy, structure, and Cenozoic tectonic evolution. Geology of México: Celebrating the Centenary of the Geological Society of México: Geological Society of America, Special Paper 422, Álvarez, S.A., and Nieto-Samaniego, Á.F., eds., 41-70.

 

Ortega-Flores, B. S.-A., 2015, The Mesozoic successions of western Sierra de Zacatecas, Central Mexico: provenance and tectonic implications. Geology Magazine, 1-22.

 

Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., 2016 (May), Goldcorp Inc. Camino Rojo Project Prefeasibility Pit Slope Design Study, Geotechnical Investigations and Slope Design Recommendations for the Proposed Oxide and Sulphide Open Pits, Prepared for Goldcorp.

 

Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., 2018 (October), Waste Rock Facility and Heap Leach Pad - Preliminary Stability Analyses.

 

Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., 2019 (April), Slope Stability Assessments and Slope Steepening Using Reinforcement for the North and West Walls of the Camino Rojo: Constrained: Mine Plan.

 

Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., 2019 (April), Waste Rock Facility and Heap Leach Pad - Preliminary Stability Analyses.

 

Resource Geosciences Incorporated, 2018 (December), 2018 Drill Program QA QC Report Camino Rojo Project, Municipio of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico.

 

Rocha-Rocha, M., 2016 (May), Metallogenesis of the Peñasquito polymetallic deposit: A contribution to the understanding of the magmatic ore system. Doctoral dissertation. Reno, Nevada, USA: University of Nevada Reno.

 

Sanchez, S., 2017 (May), The Mineralogy, Paragenesis And Alteration Of The Camino Rojo Deposit, Zacatecas, Mexico. Master of Science Thesis. Reno, Nevada, USA: University of Nevada, Reno.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

27.0 References

Page 27-5

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

SEMARNAT, Delegacion en el Estado De Zacatecas, Subdelegación de Gestión para la Protección Ambiental y Recursos Naturales., 2013, Oficio No DFZ152-203/13/1675. Zacatecas, Zacatecas: Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Mexico.

 

Servicio Geológico Mexicano, 2000, Carta Geológico-Minero Concepcion del Oro G14-10. Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico: Servicio Geológico Mexicano.

 

Servicio Geológico Mexicano, 2014, Carta Geológico-Minero San Tiburcio G14C82. Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico: Servicio Geologico Mexicano.

 

SGS Minerals Services, 2009 (August), Progress Report 1, Evaluation of the Amenability of Camino Rojo Drill Hole Samples to Cyanide Leaching and Flotation Processes, Report SGS 54-08, Prepared for Canplats de México, S.A. de C.V.

 

SGS Minerals Services, 2009 (August), An Investigation into the Amenability of 21 Camino Rojo Samples to Leaching and Flotation Processes, Report SGS-09-09, Progress Report 2, Prepared for Canplats de México, S.A. de C.V.

 

Tristán-González, M. A.-D.-H.-H., 2009, Post-Laramide and pre-Basin and Range deformation and implications for Paleogene (55–25 Ma) volcanism in central Mexico: A geological basis for a volcano-tectonic stress model. Tectonophysics, 136-152.

 

Ward, J., 2019 (June), Groundwater Flow Modeling for Projected Camino Rojo Mine Project.

 

Weiss, S. I.-V.-D.-C.,2010, Geologic Setting and Polymetallic Style of Gold Mineralization, Camino Rojo Deposit, Northern Zacatecas, Mexico. Gold and Base Metal Deposits in the Mexican Altiplano, States of Zacatecas and San Luis Potosi, Central Mexico, Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook series, V. 40, 97-102.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

27.0 References

Page 27-6

 

 

 

Camino Rojo Project Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

28.0 DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE

 

This report, entitled Feasibility Study NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico has the following report dates:

 

Report Date is: 25 June 2019
   
Mineral Resource Effective Date is: 7 June 2019
   
Mineral Reserve Effective Date is: 24 June 2019
   

The report was prepared as per the following signed Qualified Persons’ Certificates.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June, 2019

 

28.0 Date & Signature

Page 28-1

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

 

I, Carl Defilippi, RM SME, of Reno, Nevada, USA, Sr. Project Engineer at Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, as an author of this report entitled “Feasibility Study - NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project - Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019, prepared for Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Issuer”) do hereby certify that:

 

1. I am employed as a Sr. Project Engineer at Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, an independent metallurgical consulting firm, whose address is 7950 Security Circle, Reno, Nevada 89506.

 

2. This certificate applies to the technical report “Feasibility Study - NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project - Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated June 25, 2019 (the “Technical Report”).

 

3. I am a registered member with the Society of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (SME) since 2011 and my qualifications include experience applicable to the subject matter of the Technical Report. In particular, I am a graduate of the University of Nevada with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering (1978) and a M.S. in Metallurgical Engineer (1981). I have practiced my profession continuously since 1982. Most of my professional practice has focused on the development of gold-silver leaching projects. I have successfully managed numerous studies at all levels on various cyanidation projects.

 

4. I am familiar with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and by reason of education, experience and professional registration I fulfill the requirements of a “qualified person” as defined in NI 43-101.

 

5. I visited the Camino Rojo property for a total of four days on January 17-18, 2019 and on 20-21 February, 2018.

 

6. I am responsible for Sections 1.1, 1.5, 1.9, 1.10, 1.12, 1.13, 1.14, 1.15.1, 1.15.2, 1.15.3.2, 1.15.3.4, 1.16.1, 2, 3, 12.2, 12.3, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20.1.7, 21.0, 21.1, 21.1.2, 21.1.3 through 21.1.9, 21.2, 21.2.2, 21.3, 22, 24.1, 24.2, 25.1, 25.1.2, 25.2.3, 25.3.2, 25.3.4, 26.1, 27 and 28 of the Technical Report.

 

7. I am independent of the Issuer as described in section 1.5 of NI 43-101.

 

8. I have had no prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report, other than as an author of the previous technical reports entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019 and “CSA NI43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipio of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated 24 January 2018.

 

9. I have read NI 43-101 and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

 

10. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

 

- 2

 

Dated this 6th day of August, 2019

 

   
“Carl E. Defilippi”  

Carl Defilippi, RM SME

 

Sr. Project Engineer at

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

 

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

 

I, Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM, of Tucson, Arizona, USA, Vice President and Principal Mining Engineer at Independent Mining Consultants, Inc., as an author of this report entitled “Feasibility Study - NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project - Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019, prepared for Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Issuer”) do hereby certify that:

 

1. I am employed as a Vice President and Principal Mining Engineer at Independent Mining Consultants, Inc., an independent mining consulting firm, whose address is 3560 East Gas Road, Tucson, Arizona, 85714, USA, phone number (520) 294-9861.

 

2. This certificate applies to the technical report “Feasibility Study - NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project - Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated June 25, 2019 (the “Technical Report”).

 

3. I hold the following academic qualifications:

 

B.S. (Mining Engineering) University of Arizona 1979

 

M.S. (Mining Engineering) University of Arizona 1982

 

4. I am a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (FAusIMM #221108), a professional association as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). As well, I am a member in good standing of the following technical associations and societies:

 

Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. (SME Member # 1423200)

 

Member of Resources and Reserves Committee of the Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration.

 

The Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM Member #100809)

 

5. I have worked in the minerals industry as an engineer continuously since 1979, a period of 40 years. I am a founding partner, Vice President, and Principal Mining Engineer for Independent Mining Consultants, Inc., a position I have held since 1983. I have been employed as an Adjunct Lecturer at the University of Arizona (1997-1998) where I taught classes in open pit mine planning and mine economic analysis. I am also a member of the Resources and Reserves Committee of the Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration since March 2012. I was employed as a staff engineer for Pincock, Allen & Holt, Inc. from 1979 to 1983. During my career I have had extensive experience reviewing and auditing deposit sampling methods, analytical procedures, and QA/QC analysis. I also have many years of experience developing mineral resource models, developing open pit mine plans and production schedules, calculating equipment requirements for open pit mining operations, developing mine capital and operating cost estimates, performing economic analysis of mining operations and managing various preliminary economic assessments, Pre-Feasibility, and Feasibility Studies.

 

6. I am familiar with NI 43-101 and by reason of education, experience and professional registration I fulfill the requirements of a “qualified person” as defined in NI 43-101.

 

7. I visited the Camino Rojo property for two days from February 20-21, 2018.

 

 

- 2

 

8. I am responsible for Sections 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.15.3.1, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.5.1, 10.6.1, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3.1, 11.3.2, 11.4.1, 12.1.1, 12.1.3, 14, 15, 16, 21.1.1, 21.2.1, 24.4, 25.1.1, 25.2.1, 25.2.2, and 25.3.1.

 

9. I am independent of the Issuer as described in section 1.5 of NI 43-101.

 

10. I have had no prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report, other than as an author of the previous technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019.

 

11. I have read NI 43-101 and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

 

12. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Dated this 6th day of August, 2019

 

   
“Michael G. Hester”  

Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM

 

Vice President and Principal Mining Engineer

 

Independent Mining Consultants, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

 

I, Dr. Matthew Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. #10688, of Rio Rico, Arizona, USA, Geologist at Resource Geosciences Incorporated, as an author of this report entitled “Feasibility Study - NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project - Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019, prepared for Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Issuer”) do hereby certify that:

 

1. I am employed as a geologist at Resource Geosciences Incorporated, an independent consulting geosciences firm, whose address is 765A Dorotea Ct, Rio Rico, Arizona, 85648 USA.

 

2. This certificate applies to the technical report “Feasibility Study - NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project - Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated June 25, 2019 (the “Technical Report”).

 

3. I am a Certified Professional Geologist (#10688) with the American Institute of Professional Geologists since 2003, a Member and Fellow of the Society of Economic Geologists since 1987, and my qualifications include experience applicable to the subject matter of the Technical Report. In particular, I am a graduate of the Colorado School of Mines (Ph.D., Geology with Minor in Mineral Economics, 1994; B.Sc., Geological Engineering, 1985) and the University of Arizona (M.Sc., Geosciences, 1988) and I have practiced my profession continuously since 1988. Most of my professional practice has focused on exploration for metallic mineral deposits, the creation of resource models, and the economic development of gold and copper deposits. I successfully managed mine permitting, water rights, and community relocation issues related to development of the Piedras Verdes copper mine, a large scale open pit mine in Sonora, Mexico.

 

4. I am familiar with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and by reason of education, experience and professional registration I fulfill the requirements of a “qualified person” as defined in NI 43-101.

 

5. I visited the Camino Rojo property for a total of 21 days during the periods 12-13 December 2016, 19 to 22 February, 18 to 20 July, and 20 to 24 August 2018, and 17 to 18 January and 8 to 12 April 2019.

 

6. I am responsible for Sections 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.11, 1.15.3.3, 1.16.2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.4, 10.5.2, 10.6.2, 11.3.3, 11.4.2, 12.1.2, 20 exclusive of 20.1.7, 23, 25.1.3, 25.2.4, 25.3.3, and 26.2.

 

7. I am independent of the Issuer as described in section 1.5 of NI 43-101.

 

8. I have had no prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report, other than as an author of the previous technical reports entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019, and “CSA NI43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipio of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated 24 January 2018.

 

9. I have read NI 43-101 and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

 

10. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

 

- 2

 

Dated this 6th day of August, 2019

 

   
“Matthew D. Gray”  

Dr. Matthew Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. #10688

 

Geologist
Resource Geosciences Incorporated

 

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

 

I, David Hawkins, C.P.G., of Tuscon, Arizona, USA, Owner and Principal Hydrogeologist at Barranca Group, LLC, as an author of this report entitled “Feasibility Study - NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project - Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019, prepared for Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Issuer”) do hereby certify that:

 

11. I am Owner and Principal Hydrogeologist at Barranca Group, LLC, and independent groundwater hydrogeology consulting firm whose address is 2954 N. Campbell Ave., No. 149, Tucson, AZ 85719.

 

12. This certificate applies to the technical report “Feasibility Study - NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project - Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated June 25, 2019 (the “Technical Report”).

 

13. I am a Certified Professional Geologist (CPG-11613) with the American Institute of Professional Geologists since May 28, 2013. My qualifications include experience applicable to the subject matter of the Technical Report. In particular, I am a graduate of the University of Arizona, Northern Arizona University, and New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, and I have practiced my profession continuously since 1981. Most of my professional practice has focused on water supply development investigations and groundwater quality investigations.

 

14. I am familiar with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and by reason of education, experience and professional registration I fulfill the requirements of a “qualified person” as defined in NI 43-101.

 

15. I most recently visited the Camino Rojo property May 7 through 11, 2019 to supervise the test pumping of well PW-2.

 

16. I am responsible for Sections 1.16.3, 24.3, and 26.3 of the Technical Report.

 

17. I am independent of the Issuer as described in section 1.5 of NI 43-101.

 

18. Prior to being contracted by Orla Mining Ltd. In 2018 to work on groundwater-related aspects of the project I had no prior involvement with the property. I have read NI 43-101 and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

 

19. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

 

- 2

 

Dated this 6th day of August, 2019

 

   
“David B. Hawkins”  

David Hawkins, CPG

 

[Owner and Principal Hydrogeologist]
Barranca Group, LLC

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.63

 

 

EX99-58_EXHPAGE099-PAGE058_PAGE001.JPG Form 45-106F1 Report of Exempt Distribution (Non-investment fund issuer) ITEM 1 – REPORT TYPE New report Amended reportIf amended, provide Submission ID of report that is being amended:(Example: EDR1234567890-123) ITEM 2 – PARTY CERTIFYING THE REPORT Indicate the party certifying the report (select only one). For guidance regarding whether an issuer is an investment fund, refer to section 1.1 of National Instrument 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure and the companion policy to NI 81-106. Issuer (Other than an investment fund) Underwriter ITEM 3 – ISSUER NAME AND OTHER IDENTIFIERS Provide the following information about the issuer, or if the issuer is an investment fund, about the fund. Full legal name Orla Mining Ltd. Previous full legal name If the issuer's name changed in the last 12 months, provide most recent previous legal name. Website (if applicable) www.orlamining.com If the issuer has a legal entity identifier, provide below. Refer to Part B of the Instructions for the definition of “legal entity identifier”. Legal entity identifier Did two or more co-issuers distribute a single security?NoYes If two or more issuers distributed a single security, provide the full legal name(s) of the co-issuer(s) other than the issuer named above. Full legal name(s) of co-issuer(s) ITEM 4 – UNDERWRITER INFORMATION If an underwriter is completing the report, provide the underwriter’s full legal name and firm NRD number. Full legal name Does the Underwriter's Firm have an NRD Number? NoYes Firm NRD number If the underwriter does not have a firm NRD number, provide the head office contact information of the underwriter. Street addressMunicipalityProvince/StatePostal/ZIP code CountryTelephone numberWebsite (if applicable)

 

 

 

EX99-58_EXHPAGE099-PAGE058_PAGE002.JPG ITEM 5 – ISSUER INFORMATION Primary industry Provide the issuer’s North American Industry Classification Standard (NAICS) code (6 digits only) that in your reasonable judgment most closely corresponds to the issuer’s primary business activity. NAICS industry code 212221 . If the issuer is in the mining industry , indicate the stage of operations. This does not apply to issuers that provide services to issuers operating in the mining industry. Select the category that best describes the issuer’s stage of operations. ExplorationDevelopmentProduction Is the issuer’s primary business to invest all or substantially all of its assets in any of the following? If yes, select all that apply. MortgagesReal estateCommercial/business debtConsumer debtPrivate companiesCryptoassetsN/A Number of employees 0 - 4950 - 99100 - 499500 or more SEDAR profile number Does the issuer have a SEDAR profile ? NoYes If yes, provide SEDAR profile number: 00025619

 

 

 

EX99-58_EXHPAGE099-PAGE058_PAGE003.JPG ITEM 7 – INFORMATION ABOUT THE DISTRIBUTION If an issuer located outside of Canada completes a distribution in a jurisdiction of Canada, include in Item 7 and Schedule 1 information about purchasers resident in that jurisdiction of Canada only. Do not include in Item 7 securities issued as payment of commissions or finder’s fees in connection with the distribution, which must be disclosed in Item 8. The information provided in Item 7 must reconcile with the information provided in Schedule 1 of the report. Currency Select the currency or currencies in which the distribution was made. All dollar amounts provided in the report must be in Canadian dollars. Canadian dollarUS dollarEuroOther (describe): Distribution date(s) State the distribution start and end dates. If the report is being filed for securities distributed on only one distribution date, provide the distribution date as both the start and end dates. If the report is being filed for securities distributed on a continuous basis, include the start and end dates for the distribution period covered by the report. Start Date End Date Detailed purchaser information Complete Schedule 1 of this form for each purchaser and attach the schedule to the completed report. Orla Mining - 45-106F1 Schedule 1.xlsx - 49 KB Types of securities distributed Provide the following information for all distributions reported on a per security basis. Refer to Part A(12) of the Instructions for how to indicate the security code. If providing the CUSIP number, indicate the full 9-digit CUSIP number assigned to the security being distributed. Details of rights and convertible/exchangeable securities If any rights (e.g. warrants, options) were distributed, provide the exercise price and expiry date for each right. If any convertible/exchangeable securities were distributed, provide the conversion ratio and describe any other terms for each convertible/exchangeable security. Not Applicable Summary of the distribution by jurisdiction and exemption State the total dollar amount of securities distributed and the number of purchasers for each jurisdiction of Canada and foreign jurisdiction where a purchaser resides and for each exemption relied on in Canada for that distribution. However, if an issuer located outside of Canada completes a distribution in a jurisdiction of Canada, include distributions to purchasers resident in that jurisdiction of Canada only. This table requires a separate line item for (i) each jurisdiction where a purchaser resides (ii) each exemption relied on in the jurisdiction where a purchaser resides, if a purchaser resides in a jurisdiction of Canada, and (iii) each exemption relied on in Canada, if a purchaser resides in a foreign jurisdiction. For jurisdictions within of Canada, state the province or territory, otherwise state country. 2aIn calculating the number of unique purchasers per row, count each purchaser only once. Joint purchasers may be counted as one purchaser 2bIn calculating the total number of unique purchasers to which the issuer distributed securities, count each purchaser only once, regardless of whether the issuer distributed multiple types of securities to, and relied on multiple exemptions for, that purchaser.

 

 

 

EX99-58_EXHPAGE099-PAGE058_PAGE004.JPG ITEM 7 – INFORMATION ABOUT THE DISTRIBUTION h) Offering materials - This section applies only in Saskatchewan, Ontario, Québec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. If a distribution has occurred in Saskatchewan, Ontario, Québec, New Brunswick or Nova Scotia, complete the table below by listing the offering materials that are required under the prospectus exemption relied on to be filed with or delivered to the securities regulatory authority or regulator in those jurisdictions. In Ontario, if the offering materials listed in the table are required to be filed with or delivered to the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC), attach an electronic version of the offering materials that have not been previously filed with or delivered to the OSC. Not Applicable Description Date of document or other material Previously filed with or delivered to regulator? Previously filed Submission ID Filename 1.YN

 

 

 

EX99-58_EXHPAGE099-PAGE058_PAGE005.JPG ITEM 8 – COMPENSATION INFORMATION Provide information for each person (as defined in NI 45-106) to whom the issuer directly provides, or will provide, any compensation in connection with the distribution. Complete additional copies of this page if more than one person was, or will be, compensated. Indicate whether any compensation was paid, or will be paid, in connection with the distribution. NoYes PERSON 1 Name of person compensated and registration status Indicate whether the person compensated is a registrant. NoYes If the person compensated is an individual, provide the full legal name of the individual. Family nameFirst given nameSecondary given names If the person compensated is not an individual, provide the following information. Full legal name of non-individualFirm NRD number (if applicable) Indicate whether the person compensated facilitated the distribution through a funding portal or an internet-based portal. NoYes Business contact information If a firm NRD number is not provided in Item 8(a), provide the business contact information of the person being compensated. Street addressMunicipalityProvince/StatePostal/ZIP code CountryTelephone numberEmail address Relationship to issuer or investment fund manager Indicate the person’s relationship with the issuer or investment fund manager (select all that apply). Refer to the meaning of “connected” in Part B(2) of the Instructions and the meaning of “control” in section 1.4 of NI 45-106 for the purposes of completing this section. Connected with the issuer or investment fund manager Employee of the issuer or investment fund manager Insider of the issuer (other than an investment fund) None of the above Director or officer of the investment fund or investment fund manager Compensation details Provide details of all compensation paid, or to be paid, to the person identified in Item 8(a) in connection with the distribution. Provide all amounts in Canadian dollars. Include cash commissions, securities-based compensation, gifts, discounts or other compensation. Do not report payments for services incidental to the distribution, such as clerical, printing, legal or accounting services. An issuer is not required to ask for details about, or report on, internal allocation arrangements with the directors, officers or employees of a non-individual compensated by the issuer. Check box if the person will or may receive any deferred compensation (describe the terms below)

 

 

 

EX99-58_EXHPAGE099-PAGE058_PAGE006.JPG Provide the aggregate value of all securities distributed as compensation, excluding options, warrants or other rights exercisable to acquire additional securities of the issuer. Indicate the security codes for all securities distributed as compensation, including options, warrants or other rights exercisable to acquire additional securities of the issuer. Do not include deferred compensation.

 

 

 

EX99-58_EXHPAGE099-PAGE058_PAGE007.JPG ITEM 9 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND PROMOTERS OF THE ISSUER Indicate whether the issuer is any of the following (select the one that applies - if more than one applies, select only one). Reporting issuer in any jurisdiction of Canada Foreign public issuer Wholly owned subsidiary of a reporting issuer in any jurisdiction of Canada 6 Provide name of reporting issuer Wholly owned subsidiary of a foreign public issuer 6 Provide name of foreign public issuer Issuer distributing only eligible foreign securities and the distribution is to permitted clients only 7 If the issuer is at least one of the above, do not complete Item 9(a) – (c). Proceed to Item 10. An issuer is a wholly owned subsidiary of a reporting issuer or a foreign public issuer if all of the issuer’s outstanding voting securities, other than securities that are required by law to be owned by its directors, are beneficially owned by the reporting issuer or the foreign public issuer, respectively. 7 Check this box if it applies to the current distribution even if the issuer made previous distributions of other types of securities to non-permitted clients. Refer to the definitions of “eligible foreign security” and “permitted client” in Part B(1) of the Instructions. If the issuer is none of the above, check this box and complete Item 9(a) – (c). Directors, executive officers and promoters of the issuer Provide the following information for each director, executive officer and promoter of the issuer. For locations within Canada, state the province or territory, otherwise state the country. For “Relationship to issuer”, “D” – Director, “O” – Executive Officer, “P” – Promoter. Promoter information If the promoter listed above is not an individual, provide the following information for each director and executive officer of the promoter. For locations within Canada, state the province or territory, otherwise state the country. For “Relationship to promoter”, “D” – Director, “O” – Executive Officer. Residential address of each individual Complete Schedule 2 of this form providing the full residential address for each individual listed in Item 9(a) and (b) and attach to the completed report. Schedule 2 also requires information to be provided about control persons.

 

 

 

EX99-58_EXHPAGE099-PAGE058_PAGE008.JPG ITEM 10 – CERTIFICATION Provide the following certification and business contact information of an officer, director or agent of the issuer or underwriter. If the issuer or underwriter is not a company, an individual who performs functions similar to that of a director or officer may certify the report. For example, if the issuer is a trust, the report may be certified by the issuer's trustee. If the issuer is an investment fund, a director or officer of the investment fund manager (or, if the investment fund manager is not a company, an individual who performs similar functions) may certify the report if the director or officer has been authorized to do so by the investment fund. The certification may be delegated, but only to an agent that has been authorized by an officer or director of the issuer or underwriter to prepare and certify the report on behalf of the issuer or underwriter. If the report is being certified by an agent on behalf of the issuer or underwriter, provide the applicable information for the agent in the boxes below. If the individual completing and filing the report is different from the individual certifying the report, provide the name and contact details for the individual completing and filing the report in Item 11. The signature on the report must be in typed form rather than handwritten form. The report may include an electronic signature provided the name of the signatory is also in typed form. Securities legislation requires an issuer or underwriter that makes a distribution of securities under certain prospectus exemptions to file a completed report of exempt distribution. By completing the information below, I certify, on behalf of the issuer/underwriter, to the securities regulatory authority or regulator, as applicable, that I have reviewed this report and to my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the information provided in this report is true and, to the extent required, complete. Name of issuer/underwriter/agent Orla Mining Ltd. Full legal name - Family name Morin First given name Etienne Secondary given names Title Telephone number Email address Signature /s/ "Etienne Morin"Date2019-07-25 ITEM 11 – CONTACT PERSON Provide the following business contact information for the individual that the securities regulatory authority or regulator may contact with any questions regarding the contents of this report, if different than the individual certifying the report in Item 10. Same as individual certifying the report Full legal name - Family nameFirst given nameSecondary given namesTitle Name of companyTelephone numberEmail address Notice – Collection and use of personal information The personal information required under this form is collected on behalf of and used by the securities regulatory authority or regulator under the authority granted in securities legislation for the purposes of the administration and enforcement of the securities legislation. If you have any questions about the collection and use of this information, contact the securities regulatory authority or regulator in the local jurisdiction(s) where the report is filed, at the address(es) listed at the end of this form. The attached Schedules 1 and 2 may contain personal information of individuals and details of the distribution(s). The information in Schedules 1 and 2 will not be placed on the public file of any securities regulatory authority or regulator. However, freedom of information legislation may require the securities regulatory authority or regulator to make this information available if requested. By signing this report, the issuer/underwriter confirms that each individual listed in Schedule 1 or 2 of the report who is resident in a jurisdiction of Canada: has been notified by the issuer/underwriter of the delivery to the securities regulatory authority or regulator of the information pertaining to the individual as set out in Schedule 1 or 2, that this information is being collected by the securities regulatory authority or regulator under the authority granted in securities legislation, that this information is being collected for the purposes of the administration and enforcement of the securities legislation of the local jurisdiction, and of the title, business address and business telephone number of the public official in the local jurisdiction, as set out in this form, who can answer questions about the security regulatory authority’s or regulator’s indirect collection of the information, and has authorized the indirect collection of the information by the securities regulatory authority or regulator. EDR1564093746-306 Submission ID 2019-07-25 19:21:07.236 Date

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.64

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

STOCK OPTION PLAN

 

EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 6, 2016, AND AMENDED May 24, 2018 AND JUNE 12, 2019

 

1. PURPOSE

 

The purpose of this stock option plan (the “Plan”) is to authorize the grant to Eligible Persons (as such term is defined below) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”) of options to purchase common shares of the Corporation's capital and thus benefit the Corporation by enabling it to attract, retain and motivate Eligible Persons by providing them with the opportunity, through share options, to acquire an increased proprietary interest in the Corporation.

 

2. DEFINITIONS

 

(a) Act” means the Canada Business Corporations Act, or its successor, as amended, from time to time;

 

(b) Affiliate” means any corporation that is an affiliate of the Corporation as defined in National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus and Registration Exemptions, as may be amended from time to time;

 

(c) Blackout Period” has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 8;

 

(a) Board” means the board of directors of the Corporation, or any committee of the board of directors to which the duties of the board of directors hereunder are delegated;

 

(d) Change of Control” means, in respect of the Corporation: (i) if, as a result of or in connection with the election of directors, the people who were directors (or who were entitled under a contractual arrangement to be directors) of the Corporation before the election cease to constitute a majority of the Board, unless the directors have been nominated by management or approved by a majority of the previously serving directors; (ii) any transaction at any time and by whatever means pursuant to which any person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert as a single control group or any affiliate (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation or in connection with a reorganization of the Corporation) or any one or more directors thereof hereafter “beneficially owns” (as defined in the Act) directly or indirectly, or acquires the right to exercise control or direction over, voting securities of the Corporation representing 50% or more of the then issued and outstanding voting securities of the Corporation, as the case may be, in any manner whatsoever; (iii) the sale, assignment, lease or other transfer or disposition of more than 50% of the assets of the Corporation to a person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation or in connection with a reorganization of the Corporation); (iv) the occurrence of a transaction requiring approval of the Corporation’s shareholders whereby the Corporation is acquired through consolidation, merger, exchange of securities involving all of the Corporation’s voting securities, purchase of assets, amalgamation, statutory arrangement or otherwise by any person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert (other than a short-form amalgamation of the Corporation or an exchange of securities with a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation or a reorganization of the Corporation); or (v) any sale, lease, exchange, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation other than in the ordinary course of business;

 

 

 

 

(b) Company” means a corporation, incorporated association or organization, body corporate, partnership, trust, association or other entity other than an individual;

 

(c) Common Shares” means the common shares in the capital of the Corporation, as adjusted in accordance with the provisions of Article Fifteen of this Plan;

 

(d) Consultant” has the meaning set out in Section 2.22 of National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus and Registration Exemptions, as may be amended or replaced from time to time.

 

(e) Corporation” means Orla Mining Ltd., a company duly incorporated under the federal laws of Canada;

 

(f) Eligible Person” means any senior officer or director, Employee, Management Company Employee, Consultant of the Corporation or its subsidiaries or Affiliates;

 

(g) Employee” means:

 

(i) an individual who is considered an employee of the Corporation under the Income Tax Act (Canada) (and for whom income tax, employment insurance and CPP deductions must be made at source);

 

(ii) an individual who works full-time for the Corporation providing services normally provided by an employee and who is subject to the same control and direction by the Corporation over the details and methods of work as an employee of the Corporation, but for whom income tax deductions are not made at source, or

 

(iii) an individual who works for the Corporation on a continuing and regular basis for a minimum amount of time per week (the number of hours should be disclosed in the submission) providing services normally provided by an employee and who is subject to the same control and direction by the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries over the details and methods of work as an employee of the Corporation, but for whom income tax deductions are not made at source;

 

(h) Exercise Price” has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 7;

 

2

 

 

(i) Insider” means an “Insider” as defined in the TSX Company Manual;

 

(j) Management Company Employee” means an individual employed by a Person providing management services to the Corporation, which are required for the ongoing successful operation of the business enterprise of the Corporation;

 

(k) Person” means a Company or individual;

 

(l) Security Based Compensation Arrangement” includes, without limitation: (i) stock option plans for the benefit of employees, insiders, service providers or any one of such groups; (ii) individual stock options granted to employees, service providers or insiders if not granted pursuant to a plan previously approved by the Corporation’s security holders; (iii) stock purchase plans where the Corporation provides financial assistance or where the Corporation matches the whole or a portion of the securities being purchased; (iv) stock appreciation rights involving issuances of securities from treasury; (v) any other compensation or incentive mechanism involving the issuance or potential issuances of securities of the Corporation; and (vi) security purchases from treasury by an employee, insider or service provider which is financially assisted by the Corporation by any means whatsoever, but shall not include the 500,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”;

 

(m) Securities Laws” means securities legislation, securities regulation and securities rules, as amended, and the policies, notices, instruments and blanket orders in force from time to time that are applicable to the Corporation;

 

(n) TSX” means the Toronto Stock Exchange; and

 

(o) TSX Company Manual” means the TSX Company Manual setting forth the rules and policies of the TSX, as the same may be amended from time to time.

 

3. ADMINISTRATION

 

The Plan shall be administered by the Board or a committee established by the Board for that purpose. Subject to approval of the granting of options by the Board, the Corporation shall grant options under the Plan.

 

Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Board shall have authority to construe and interpret the Plan and all option agreements entered into thereunder, to define the terms used in the Plan and in all option agreements entered into thereunder, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. All determinations and interpretations made by the Board shall be binding and conclusive on all participants in the Plan and on their legal personal representatives and beneficiaries.

 

3

 

 

4. SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN

 

Subject to adjustment under the provisions of Section 15 and the limits in Section 5, the aggregate number of Common Shares which may be available for issuance under the Plan will not exceed 10% of the total number of Common Shares of the Corporation issued and outstanding from time to time. Under no circumstances may the number of Common Shares issuable pursuant to stock options under the Plan, together with Common Shares issuable under all Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, exceed 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding.

 

The Corporation shall not, upon the exercise of any option, be required to issue or deliver any Common Shares prior to (a) the admission of such Common Shares to listing on any stock exchange on which the Common Shares may then be listed, and (b) the completion of such registration or other qualification of such Common Shares under any law, rules or regulation as the Corporation shall determine to be necessary or advisable. If any Common Shares cannot be issued to any optionee for whatever reason, the obligation of the Corporation to issue such Common Shares shall terminate and any option exercise price paid to the Corporation shall be returned to the optionee.

 

5. LIMITS ON SHARES ISSUABLE

 

(a) The maximum aggregate number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one Eligible Person under the Plan, together with all other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares at the time of grant (on a non-diluted basis);

 

(b) The maximum number of Common Shares which may issuable at any time to Insiders (as a group) under the Plan, or together with any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall be 10% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares at the time of the grant (on a non-diluted basis);

 

(c) The maximum number of Common Shares which may be issued within any one year period to Insiders (as a group) under the Plan, or together with any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall be 10% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares; and

 

(d) The maximum equity value which may be granted by the Corporation to each non-Employee director (“Non-Employee Director”) under the Plan, together with all Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall not exceed $150,000 in any fiscal year, of which not more than $100,000 may be in the form of stock options granted under this Plan (the “Non-Employee Director Participation Limits”). The Non-Employee Director Participation Limits do not apply where the Corporation is making an initial grant to a new Non-Employee Director upon that person joining the Board.

 

4

 

 

6. ELIGIBILITY

 

Options shall be granted only to Eligible Persons, any registered savings plan established by an Eligible Person or any Company wholly-owned by an Eligible Person.

 

For stock options to Employees, Consultants or Management Company Employees, the Corporation must represent that the optionee is a bona fide Employee, Consultant or Management Company Employee as the case may be. The terms “controlled” and “subsidiary” shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Securities Act (British Columbia) from time to time. Subject to the foregoing, the Board, shall have full and final authority to determine the persons who are to be granted options under the Plan and the number of Common Shares subject to each option.

 

7. EXERCISE PRICE

 

The exercise price (the “Exercise Price”) for the Common Shares under each option shall be determined by the Board on the basis of the market price, where “market price” shall mean the prior trading day closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX, and where there is no such closing price or trade on the prior trading day, “market price”' shall mean the average of the daily high and low board lot trading prices of the Common Shares on the TSX for the five (5) immediately preceding trading days. In the event the Common Shares are not listed on any exchange and do not trade on any dealing network, the market price will be determined by the Board.

 

8. TERM OF OPTIONS

 

The period within which an option may be exercised and the number of Common Shares which may be issuable upon the exercise of options in any such period shall be determined by the Board at the time of granting the options provided, however, that all options shall not be granted for a term exceeding 10 years from the date of the option grant.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the expiry date of an option expires during, or within 48 hours of a trading blackout period imposed by the Corporation (a “Blackout Period”), and neither the Corporation nor the individual in possession of the options is subject to a cease trade order in respect of the Corporation’s securities, then the expiry date of such option shall be automatically extended to the 10th business day following the end of the Blackout Period.

 

On the expiry date of any option granted under the Plan, and subject to any extension of such expiry date permitted in accordance with the Plan, such option hereby granted shall forthwith expire and terminate and be of no further force or effect whatsoever as to such of the optioned shares (as defined below) in respect of which the option has not been exercised.

 

9. EXERCISE OF OPTIONS

 

Subject to the provisions of the Plan and the particular option, an option may be exercised from time to time following the date of grant and up to 5:00 p.m. local time on the expiry date by delivering to the Corporation at its registered office a written notice of exercise specifying the number of Common Shares with respect to which the option is being exercised (the “optioned shares”) and accompanied by payment in cash or certified cheque for the full amount of the purchase price of the Common Shares then being purchased. Certificates for such optioned shares shall be issued and delivered to the optionee within a reasonable time following the receipt of such notice and payment.

 

5

 

 

10. VESTING RESTRICTIONS

 

Options issued under the Plan may vest and become exercisable at the discretion of the Board.

 

11. EVIDENCE OF OPTIONS

 

Each option granted under the Plan shall be embodied in a written option agreement between the Corporation and the optionee which shall give effect to the provisions of the Plan.

 

12. CESSATION OF PROVISION OF SERVICES

 

Subject to Section 13 below, if any optionee ceases to be an Eligible Person of the Corporation for any reason other than as a result of having been dismissed for cause as provided or as a result of the optionee's death, such optionee shall have the right for a period of 90 days (or until the normal expiry date of the option rights of such optionee if earlier) from the date of ceasing to be an Eligible Person to exercise the option under the Plan with respect to all options of such optionee to the extent they were exercisable on the date of ceasing to be either an Eligible Person, subject to extension by the Board. Upon the expiration of such 90-day (or later) period all unexercised option rights of that optionee shall immediately become terminated and shall lapse notwithstanding the original term of option granted to such optionee under the Plan.

 

If an optionee ceases to be either an Eligible Person as a result of having been dismissed from any such position for cause, all unexercised option rights of that optionee under the Plan shall immediately become terminated and shall lapse, notwithstanding the original term of the option granted to such optionee under the Plan.

 

13. DEATH OF OPTIONEE

 

In the event of the death of an optionee during the currency of the optionee's option, the option theretofore granted to the optionee shall vest and be exercisable within, but only within, the period of one year next succeeding the optionee's death or until the normal expiry date of the option rights of such optionee if earlier.

 

14. NON-ASSIGNABILITY AND NON-TRANSFERABILITY OF OPTION

 

An option granted under the Plan shall be non-assignable and non-transferable by an optionee otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and such option shall be exercisable, during an optionee's lifetime, only by the optionee.

 

6

 

 

15. ADJUSTMENTS IN SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN

 

The aggregate number and kind of Common Shares available under the Plan shall be appropriately adjusted in the event of a reorganization, recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares, merger, consolidation, rights offering or any other change in the corporate structure or shares of the Corporation. The options granted under the Plan may contain such provisions as the Board may determine with respect to adjustments to be made in the number and kind of Common Shares covered by such options and in the option price in the event of any such change.

 

16. EFFECT OF A TAKE-OVER BID

 

If a bona fide offer ( an “Offer”) for Common Shares is made to shareholders of the Corporation generally or to a class of shareholders which includes the optionee, which Offer, if accepted in whole or in part, would result in the offeror becoming a control person of the Corporation, within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws, the Corporation shall, immediately upon receipt of notice of the Offer, notify each holder of stock options of full particulars of the Offer, whereupon (subject to the approval of the TSX) all optioned shares subject to such stock option will become vested and the stock option may be exercised in whole or in part so as to permit the optionee to tender the optioned shares received upon such exercise, pursuant to the Offer. However, if: (a) the Offer is not completed within the time specified therein; or (b) all of the optioned shares tendered pursuant to the Offer are not taken up or paid for by the offeror in respect thereof, then the optioned shares received upon such exercise, or in the case of clause (b) above, the optioned shares that are not taken up and paid for, may be returned by the optionee to the Corporation and reinstated as authorized but unissued Common Shares and with respect to such returned optioned shares, the stock option shall be reinstated as if it had not been exercised and the terms upon which such optioned shares were to become vested pursuant to this paragraph shall be reinstated. If any optioned shares are returned to the Corporation under this paragraph, the Corporation shall immediately refund the exercise price to the optionee for such optioned shares.

 

17. CHANGE OF CONTROL

 

In the event of (i) a Change of Control, and (ii) within 12 months of such Change of Control the Corporation terminates the employment of the Eligible Person for any reason other than just cause, or the Eligible Person resigns for “Good Reason” as defined in the employment agreement then all of a that Person’s stock options will immediately vest on the date of such termination. In such event, all vested stock options will be exercisable, conditionally or otherwise, from such date until their respective expiry dates, subject to the terms of any employment agreement or other contractual arrangement between the Person and the Corporation. For greater certainty, upon a Change of Control, holders of stock options shall not be treated any more favourably than holders of Common Shares with respect to the consideration that such Persons would be entitled to receive.

 

If the Person elects to exercise its stock options following a Change of Control, the holder of stock options shall be entitled to receive, and shall accept, in lieu of the number of Common Shares which he was entitled upon such exercise, the kind and amount of shares and other securities, property or cash which such holder could have been entitled to receive as a result of such Change of Control, on the effective date thereof, had he been the registered holder of the number of Common Shares to which he was entitled to purchase upon exercise of such stock options.

 

7

 

 

18. EMPLOYMENT

 

Nothing contained in the Plan shall confer upon any optionee any right with respect to employment or continuance of employment with the Corporation or any subsidiary, or interfere in any way with the right of the Corporation, or any subsidiary, to terminate the optionee’s employment at any time. Participation in the Plan by an optionee is voluntary.

 

19. NO SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PRIOR TO EXERCISE

 

An optionee shall have no rights whatsoever as a shareholder in respect of any of the optioned shares (including any right to receive dividends or other distributions therefrom or thereon) other than in respect of optioned shares in respect of which the optionee shall have exercised the option to purchase hereunder and which the optionee shall have actually taken up and paid for.

 

20. TAXES

 

The Corporation shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require an optionee to remit to the Corporation, the required amount to satisfy federal, provincial and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of the Plan, including the grant or exercise of any option granted under the Plan. With respect to any required withholding, the Corporation shall have the irrevocable right to, and the optionee consents to, the Corporation setting off any amounts required to be withheld, in whole or in part, against amounts otherwise owing by the Corporation to the optionee (whether arising pursuant to the optionee's relationship as a director, officer, employee or consultant of the Corporation or otherwise), or may make such other arrangements that are satisfactory to the optionee and the Corporation. In addition, the Corporation may elect, in its sole discretion, to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by withholding such number of Common Shares issuable upon exercise of the options as it determines are required to be sold by the Corporation, as trustee, to satisfy any withholding obligations net of selling costs. The optionee consents to such sale and grants to the Corporation an irrevocable power of attorney to effect the sale of such Common Shares issuable upon exercise of the options and acknowledges and agrees that the Corporation does not accept responsibility for the price obtained on the sale of such Common Shares issuable upon exercise of the options

 

8

 

 

21. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF THE PLAN

 

The Board may terminate, discontinue or amend the Plan at any time, provided that, without the consent of an option holder, such termination, discontinuance or amendment may not in any manner adversely affect such optionee’s rights under any stock option granted under the Plan.

 

The Board may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory and shareholder approval, make the following amendments to the Plan or options under the Plan:

 

a) amendments to increase the number of Common Shares which may be issued pursuant to the Plan, other than adjustments by virtue of Section 15;

 

b) amendments to reduce the exercise price, or cancel and reissue stock options;

 

c) amendments that extend the term of a stock option beyond the original expiry;

 

d) amendments to the definition of “Eligible Persons” under the Plan that may permit the introduction or reintroduction of Non-Employee Directors on a discretionary basis or amendments that increase limits previously imposed on Non-Employee Director participation in Section 5;

 

e) amendments to Section 14 that would permit stock options, or any other right or interest of an optionee under the Plan, to be assigned or transferred, other than for normal estate settlement purposes;

 

f) amendments to this Section 21 of the Plan; or

 

g) amendments to the participation limits in Section 5.

 

The Board may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory approval (where required), but not subject to shareholder approval, in its sole discretion make all other amendments to the Plan or options under the Plan that are not of the type contemplated above, including, without limitation:

 

a) amendments of a housekeeping nature;

 

b) amendments to the exercise procedures or vesting provisions of a stock option or the Plan;

 

c) amendments to the definitions, other than such definitions noted in this Section 21 above;

 

9

 

 

d) to the take-over bid provisions provided for in Section 16 or the change of control provisions provided for in Section 17. For greater certainty, any change made to Section 16 or Section 17 shall not allow optionees to be treated any more favourably than other holders of Common Shares with respect to the consideration that the optionees would be entitled to receive for their Common Shares in the event of a take-over bid or upon a Change of Control;

 

e) amendments to reflect changes to applicable securities laws; and

 

f) amendments to ensure that the stock options granted under the Plan will comply with any provisions respecting income tax and other laws in force in any country or jurisdiction of which a Person to whom a stock option has been granted may from time to time be a resident, citizen or otherwise subject to tax therein.

 

22. EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PLAN

 

The Plan becomes effective on the date of its approval by the shareholders of the Corporation.

 

23. GOVERNING LAW

 

This Plan shall be construed in accordance with and be governed by the laws of the Province of British Columbia and shall be deemed to have been made in said Province, and shall be in accordance with all applicable securities laws.

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.65

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT PLAN

 

EFFECTIVE JUNE 27, 2018, AND AMENDED JUNE 12, 2019

 

Article One

DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

 

Section 1.01    Definitions: For the purposes of this Plan, unless such word or term is otherwise defined herein or the context in which such word or term is used herein otherwise requires, the following words and terms with the initial letter or letters thereof capitalized shall have the following meanings:

 

A. Act” means the Canada Business Corporations Act, or its successor, as amended, from time to time;

 

B. Affiliate” means any corporation that is an affiliate of the Corporation as defined in National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus and Registration Exemptions, as may be amended from time to time;

 

C. Board” means the Board of Directors of the Corporation;

 

D. Cause” with respect to a Participant has the meaning set forth in the Participant’s employment agreement with the Corporation or one of its Affiliates.

 

E. Change of Control” means, in respect of the Corporation: (i) if, as a result of or in connection with the election of directors, the people who were directors (or who were entitled under a contractual arrangement to be directors) of the Corporation before the election cease to constitute a majority of the Board, unless the directors have been nominated by management or approved by a majority of the previously serving directors; (ii) any transaction at any time and by whatever means pursuant to which any person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert as a single control group or any affiliate (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation or in connection with a reorganization of the Corporation) or any one or more directors thereof hereafter “beneficially owns” (as defined in the Act) directly or indirectly, or acquires the right to exercise control or direction over, voting securities of the Corporation representing 50% or more of the then issued and outstanding voting securities of the Corporation, as the case may be, in any manner whatsoever; (iii) the sale, assignment, lease or other transfer or disposition of more than 50% of the assets of the Corporation to a person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation or in connection with a reorganization of the Corporation); (iv) the occurrence of a transaction requiring approval of the Corporation’s shareholders whereby the Corporation is acquired through consolidation, merger, exchange of securities involving all of the Corporation’s voting securities, purchase of assets, amalgamation, statutory arrangement or otherwise by any person or any group of two or more persons acting jointly or in concert (other than a short-form amalgamation of the Corporation or an exchange of securities with a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation or a reorganization of the Corporation); or (v) any sale, lease, exchange, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation other than in the ordinary course of business;

 

 

- 2 -

 

F. Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

 

G. Committee” means the Board or, if the Board so determines in accordance with Section 2.03 of the Plan, the committee of the Board authorized to administer the Plan which includes any compensation committee of the Board;

 

H. Corporation” means Orla Mining Ltd., a corporation existing under the Act, and includes any successor corporation thereof;

 

I. Director” means a member of the Board or a member of the board of directors an Affiliate from time to time;

 

J. Disability” with respect to a Participant, has the meaning set forth in such Participant’s employment or consulting agreement with the Corporation or one of its Affiliates;

 

K. Eligible Consultant” has the meaning of “Consultant” set out in Section 2.22 of National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus and Registration Exemptions, as may be amended or replaced from time to time.

 

L. Eligible Employees” means (a) an individual who is considered an employee of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries under the Income Tax Act (Canada) (and for whom income tax, employment insurance and CPP deductions must be made at source); (b) an individual who works full-time for the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries providing services normally provided by an employee and who is subject to the same control and direction by the Corporation over the details and methods of work as an employee of the Corporation, but for whom income tax deductions are not made at source; or (c) an individual who works for the Corporation or its subsidiary on a continuing and regular basis for a minimum amount of time per week (the number of hours should be disclosed in the submission) providing services normally provided by an employee and who is subject to the same control and direction by the Corporation over the details and methods of work as an employee of the Corporation but for whom income tax deductions are not made at source;

 

M. Fair Market Value” means, at any date, the higher of: (i) weighted average price per share at which the Shares have traded on the TSX during the last five (5) trading days prior to that date; and (ii) the closing price of the Shares on the TSX on the date prior to the relevant date or, if the Shares are not then listed and posted for trading on the TSX, then on such stock exchange on which the Shares are then listed and posted for trading as may be selected for such purpose by the Board, or, if the Shares are not then listed and posted for trading on any stock exchange, then it shall be the fair market value per Share as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion; and for such purposes, the weighted average price per share at which the Shares have traded on the TSX or on any other stock exchange shall be calculated by dividing: (i) the aggregate sale price for all of the Shares traded on such stock exchange during the relevant five (5) trading days by (ii) the aggregate number of Shares traded on such stock exchange during the relevant five (5) trading days;

 

 

- 3 -

 

N. Good Reason” with respect to a Participant has the meaning set forth in the Participant’s employment agreement with the Corporation or one of its Affiliates.

 

O. Grant Date” means the date that the Restricted Share Unit is granted to a Participant under the Plan, as evidenced by the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter, and refers also to the date that the Restricted Share Unit is credited to the Participant which must always be in the same calendar year;

 

P. Insider” means an insider as defined in the TSX Company Manual;

 

Q. Market Value” means the the closing trading price of the Shares on the Grant Date or other applicable date, as reported by the TSX. If the Shares are not trading on the TSX, then the Market Value shall be determined based on the trading price on such stock exchange or over-the-counter market on which the Shares are listed and posted for trading as may be selected for such purpose by the Committee. In the event that the Shares are not listed and posted for trading on any stock exchange or over-the-counter market, the Market Value shall be the fair market value of such Shares as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion;

 

R. Participant” means each Eligible Employee, Director or Eligible Consultant to whom Restricted Share Units are granted hereunder;

 

S. Participant’s Entitlement Date” is defined in Section 3.03 and under no circumstances shall be later than December 15th of the third calendar year following the calendar year in which the Grant Date occurred in respect of the Restricted Share Units.

 

T. Plan” means this Restricted Share Unit Plan, as same may be amended from time to time;

 

U. Restricted Share Unit” means a unit credited by means of an entry on the books of the Corporation to a Participant, representing the right to receive on the Participant’s Entitlement Date fully paid Shares or a cash payment in lieu thereof, as set out in the Participant’s Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter;

 

V. Restricted Share Unit Award” means an award of Restricted Share Units under the Plan to a Participant;

 

W. Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter” means the letter to the Participant from the Corporation evidencing the grant of Restricted Share Units;

 

X. Resignation” means the cessation of employment of the Participant with the Corporation or an Affiliate as a result of resignation;

 

Y. Security Based Compensation Arrangement” includes, without limitation: (i) stock option plans for the benefit of employees, Insiders, service providers or any one of such groups; (ii) individual stock options granted to employees, service providers or Insiders if not granted pursuant to a plan previously approved by the Corporation’s security holders; (iii) stock purchase plans where the Corporation provides financial assistance or where the Corporation matches the whole or a portion of the securities being purchased; (iv) stock appreciation rights involving issuances of securities from treasury; (v) any other compensation or incentive mechanism involving the issuance or potential issuances of securities of the Corporation; and (vi) security purchases from treasury by an employee, Insider or service provider which is financially assisted by the Corporation by any means whatsoever, but shall not include the 500,000 Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”;

 

 

- 4 -

 

Z. Shares” means the common shares in the capital of the Corporation, as adjusted in accordance with the provisions of Article Five of this Plan;

 

AA. subsidiary” means, in respect of a person, a body corporate or other entity which is directly or indirectly controlled by such person. For such purposes, a person shall be deemed to control another person if such person possesses, directly or indirectly, the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such other person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise;

 

BB. Termination” means (i) in the case of an Eligible Employee, the later of the last day of work and the statutory notice period (if any) following notification of termination of the employment of the Eligible Employee with or without Cause by the Corporation or an Affiliate or notification of termination of the employment of the Eligible Employee for Resignation with or without Good Reason and, for certainty, does not include any period of contractual or common law notice or severance; (ii) in the case of an Eligible Consultant, the termination of the services of the Eligible Consultant by the Company or any Affiliate or the Eligible Consultant; and (iii) in the case of a Director, the removal of or failure to re-elect or re-appoint the Director as a director of the Company or any Affiliate; for greater certainty, in all cases, other than for death or disability of a Participant;

 

CC. TSX” means the Toronto Stock Exchange; and

 

DD. TSX Company Manual” means the TSX Company Manual setting forth the rules and policies of the TSX, as the same may be amended from time to time.

 

Section 1.02    Headings: The headings of all articles, Sections, and paragraphs in the Plan are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of the Plan.

 

Section 1.03    Context, Construction: Whenever the singular or masculine are used in the Plan, the same shall be construed as being the plural or feminine or neuter or vice versa where the context so requires.

 

Section 1.04    References to this Restricted Share Unit Plan: The words “herein”, “hereby”, “hereunder”, “hereof” and similar expressions mean or refer to the Plan as a whole and not to any particular article, Section, paragraph or other part hereof.

 

Section 1.05    Canadian Funds: Unless otherwise specifically provided, all references to dollar amounts in the Plan are references to lawful money of Canada.

 

 

- 5 -

 

Article Two


PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT PLAN

 

Section 2.01    Purpose of the Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan provides for the payment of bonuses to be satisfied by the issuance of Shares, a payment in cash or a combination thereof for the purpose of advancing the interests of the Corporation and its Affiliates through the motivation, attraction and retention of Eligible Employees, Directors and Eligible Consultants and to secure for the Corporation and the shareholders of the Corporation the benefits inherent in the ownership of Shares or Share equivalent by such persons, it being generally recognized that restricted share plans aid in attracting, retaining and encouraging employees due to the opportunity offered to them to benefit from a proprietary interest in the Corporation. It is intended that the Plan not be treated as a “salary deferral arrangement” as defined by the Income Tax Act (Canada) by reason of paragraph (k) thereof.

 

Section 2.02    Administration of the Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan shall be administered by the Committee and the Committee shall have full authority to administer the Plan and to adopt, amend and rescind such rules and regulations for administering the Plan as the Committee may deem necessary in order to comply with the requirements of the Plan. No member of the Committee shall be personally liable for any action taken or determination or interpretation made in good faith in connection with the Plan and all members of the Committee shall, in addition to their rights as directors of the Corporation, be fully protected, indemnified and held harmless by the Corporation with respect to any such action taken or determination or interpretation made in good faith. The appropriate officers of the Corporation are hereby authorized and empowered to do all things and execute and deliver all instruments, undertakings and applications and writings as they, in their absolute discretion, consider necessary for the implementation of the Plan and of the rules and regulations established for administering the Plan. All costs incurred in connection with the Plan shall be for the account of the Corporation.

 

Section 2.03    Delegation to Committee: All of the powers exercisable hereunder by the directors of the Corporation may, to the extent permitted by applicable law and as determined by resolution of the directors of the Corporation, be exercised by a committee of the Board comprised of not less than three directors of the Corporation.

 

Section 2.04    Record Keeping: The Corporation shall maintain a register in which shall be recorded:

 

(a) the name and address of each Participant;

 

(b) the number of Restricted Share Units granted to each Participant; and

 

(c) the number of Shares (if any) issued to, and/or any cash payment made to, each Participant in settlement of fully vested Restricted Share Units.

 

Section 2.05    Determination of Participants and Participation: The Committee shall from time to time determine the Participants who may participate in the Plan. The Committee shall from time to time determine the Participants to whom Restricted Share Units shall be granted and the provisions and restrictions with respect to such grant, all such determinations to be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan, and the Committee may take into consideration the present and potential contributions of and the services rendered by the particular Participant to the success of the Corporation and any other factors which the Committee deems appropriate and relevant.

 

 

- 6 -

 

Section 2.06    Maximum Number of Shares:

 

(a) The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares available for issuance from treasury under this Plan, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 5.06, shall not exceed 3,000,000. Under no circumstances may the number of Shares issuable pursuant to Restricted Share Units, together with Shares issuable under all Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, exceed 10% of the total number of Shares then outstanding. For purposes of this Section 2.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non-diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Restricted Share Unit.

 

(b) The maximum number of Restricted Share Units available for grant to any one Person, in a 12 month period pursuant to this Plan and any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, is 5% of the total number of Shares then outstanding. For purposes of this Section 2.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non-diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Restricted Share Unit.

 

(c) The maximum number of Shares which may be issuable at any time to Insiders (as a group) pursuant to this Plan, or together with any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall be 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares at the time of grant. The maximum number of Shares which may be issued within any one year period to Insiders (as a group), pursuant to this Plan, or together with any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall be 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares. For purposes of this Section 2.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non-diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Restricted Share Unit.

 

(d) The maximum equity value of Restricted Share Units which may be granted to each Director who is not also an Eligible Employee, together with all Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall not exceed $150,000 (based on the Market Value of the Restricted Share Units) in any fiscal year.

 

(e) For purposes of determining the number of Shares that remain available for issuance under the Plan, the number of Shares underlying any grants of Restricted Share Units that are surrendered, forfeited, waived, repurchased by the Corporation and/or cancelled shall be added back to the Plan and again be available for future grant, whereas the number of Shares underlying any grants of Restricted Share Units that are issued shall not be available for future grant.

 

Article Three

RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS

 

Section 3.01    Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan is hereby established for Eligible Employees, Directors and Eligible Consultants.

 

Section 3.02    Grant of Restricted Share Units: A Restricted Share Unit Award granted to a particular Participant in a calendar year will be a bonus for services rendered by the Participant to the Corporation or an Affiliate, as the case may be, in the Corporation’s or Affiliate’s fiscal year ending in such year, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Committee. The number of Restricted Share Units awarded will be credited to the Participant’s account, effective as of the Grant Date.

 

 

- 7 -

 

Section 3.03    Vesting: A Restricted Share Unit Award granted to a Participant for services rendered will entitle the Participant, subject to the Participant’s satisfaction of any conditions, restrictions or limitations imposed under the Plan or Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter, to receive: (i) one previously unissued Share for each Restricted Share Unit; or (ii) a cash payment equal to the number of Restricted Share Units multiplied by the Fair Market Value of one Share on the vesting date; or (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii), as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, on the date when the Restricted Share Unit Award is fully vested (the “Participant’s Entitlement Date”). Concurrent with the determination to grant Restricted Share Units to a Participant, the Committee shall determine the vesting schedule applicable to such Restricted Share Units, which shall extend no later than December 15th of the third calendar year following the calendar year in which the Grant Date occurred in respect of the Restricted Share Units.

 

Section 3.04    Termination of Employment:

 

(a) Termination with Cause or Resignation without Good Reason: Except as provided for in the Restricted Share Unit grant letter or as determined by the Committee in its discretion, upon the Termination of the employment or services of the Participant, for any reason other than death, disability, Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason, then, all unvested Restricted Share Units will be forfeited by the Participant, and be of no further force and effect, as of the date of Termination;

 

(b) Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason; Except as provided for in the Restricted Share Unit grant letter or as determined by the Committee in its discretion, provided that the Participant has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation since the Grant Date, the Participant’s unvested Restricted Share Units shall vest in full upon the date of the Participant’s Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason. The Shares and/or cash underlying such vested Restricted Share Units credited to the Participant’s account shall be issued and/or paid to the Participant as soon as practicable thereafter, provided, that for a Participant who is a United States taxpayer, subject to Section 4.02(d), the date of issuance or payment shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the Participant’s Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of payment;

 

(c) Death: Provided that the Participant has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation since the Grant Date, the Participant’s unvested Restricted Share Units will vest on the date of the Participant’s death. The Shares and/or cash underlying the Restricted Share Units credited to the Participant’s account shall be issued and/or paid to the Participant’s estate as soon as practicable thereafter, provided, that for a Participant who is a United States taxpayer, the date of issuance or payment shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the Participant’s death and provided further, that such Participant’s estate does not have a choice as to the taxable year of payment;

 

 

- 8 -

 

(d) Disability: Provided that the Participant has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation since the Grant Date, the Participant’s unvested Restricted Share Units shall vest in full within 90 days following the date on which the Participant is determined to be totally disabled, and the Shares and/or cash underlying such Restricted Share Units credited to the Participant’s account shall be issued and/or paid to the Participant as soon as practicable thereafter, provided, that for a Participant who is a United States taxpayer, subject to Section 4.02(d), the date of issuance or payment shall not be more than 90 days after the date on which the Participant is determined to be totally disabled and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of payment; and

 

(e) Change of Control: In the event of (i) a Change of Control, and (ii) within 12 months of such Change of Control the Corporation terminates the employment of the Participant for any reason other than just cause, then all Restricted Share Units outstanding shall immediately vest on the date of such termination notwithstanding any stated vesting period. In any event, upon a Change of Control, Participants shall not be treated any more favourably than shareholders of the Corporation with respect to the consideration that the Participants would be entitled to receive for their Shares, provided, however, that for a Participant who is a United States taxpayer, the Change of Control must also constitute a “change in control event” as set forth in Treas. Reg. §1.409A-3(i)(5)(i) and provided further, that any issuance or payment must occur in full within five years of the date of the Change of Control.

 

Section 3.05    Redemption - Fully Paid Shares to the Participant: Subject to Sections 3.06 and 4.01, the Corporation will satisfy its payment obligation, net of any applicable taxes and other source deductions required to be withheld by the Corporation, on the Participant’s Entitlement Date, with the issue of fully paid Shares from treasury in accordance with Section 3.03.

 

Section 3.06    Redemption – Cash Payment to the Participant: In the event that the Corporation elects to satisfy all or a part of its payment obligation in cash, on the Participant’s Entitlement Date, the Restricted Share Units shall be redeemed and payment made by the Corporation to the Participant subject to Section 4.01. The amount of the cash payment will be determined by multiplying the number of Restricted Share Units being redeemed for cash, by the Fair Market Value of one Share on the vesting date, less any applicable taxes and other source deductions required to be withheld by the Corporation.

 

Section 3.07    Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter: Each grant of a Restricted Share Unit under the Plan shall be evidenced by a Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter to the Participant from the Corporation. Such Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter shall be subject to all applicable terms and conditions of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms and conditions which are not inconsistent with the Plan and which the Committee deems appropriate for inclusion in a Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter. The provisions of the various Restricted Share Unit Grant Letters issued under the Plan need not be identical. To the extent that there is any inconsistency between the Plan and the Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter or any other communications, the Plan shall prevail.

 

Section 3.08    Payment of Dividends: Subject to the absolute discretion of the Committee, in the event that a dividend (other than a stock dividend) is declared and paid by the Corporation on Shares, the Committee may elect to credit each Participant with additional Restricted Share Units. In such case, the number of additional Restricted Share Units will be equal to the aggregate amount of dividends that would have been paid to the Participant if the Restricted Share Units in the Participant’s account had been Shares, divided by the Market Value of a Share on the date on which dividends were paid by the Corporation. The additional Restricted Share Units awarded to a Participant under this Section 3.08 of this Plan will vest on the Participant’s Entitlement Date in respect of the particular Restricted Share Unit Award to which the additional Restricted Share Units relate.

 

 

- 9 -

 

Section 3.09    Blackout: Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, in the event that any Participant’s Entitlement Date expires during, or within 48 hours after a self-imposed blackout period on the trading of securities of the Corporation, such expiry will occur on the business day immediately following the end of the blackout period, or such 48 hour period, as applicable, provided that under no circumstances shall the Participant’s Entitlement Date be later than December 15th of the third calendar year following the calendar year in which the Grant Date occurred in respect of the Restricted Share Units.

 

Section 3.10    Necessary Approvals: The Plan has been approved by the shareholders of the Corporation.

 

Article Four

TAX MATTERS

 

Section 4.01    Withholding Taxes: The Corporation or its Affiliates may take such steps as are considered necessary or appropriate for the withholding of any taxes which the Corporation or its Affiliate is required by any law or regulation of any governmental authority whatsoever to withhold in connection with any payment or delivery of Shares or cash made under this Plan including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the withholding of all or any portion of any payment or the withholding of the issue of Shares to be issued under the Plan, until such time as the Participant has paid the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation for any amount which the Corporation and its Affiliates are required to withhold with respect to such taxes. For greater certainty, immediately upon delivery of any Shares, the Corporation shall have the right to require that a Participant sell a given number of Shares to the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation sufficient to cover any applicable withholding taxes and any other source deductions to be withheld by the Corporation in connection with payments made in satisfaction of the Participant’s vested Restricted Share Units.

 

Section 4.02    Code Section 409A:

 

(a) It is intended that the Restricted Share Units issued to Participants who are United States taxpayers be exempt from or in compliance with the terms and conditions of Section 409A of the Code and the regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder (collectively, “Code Section 409A”), to the extent applicable, and all provisions of this Plan shall be construed in a manner consistent with the requirements for avoiding taxes or penalties under Section 409A. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall the Corporation or any Affiliate have any liability to any Participant for taxes, penalties, or interest that may be due as a result of the application of Code Section 409A to any Restricted Share Units Award granted hereunder.

 

(b) If under this Plan, an amount is to be paid in two or more installments, for purposes of Code Section 409A, each installment shall be treated as a separate payment.

 

 

- 10 -

 

(c) A termination of employment for a Participant who is a United States taxpayer shall not be deemed to have occurred for purposes of any provision of this Plan providing for the payment of amounts or benefits to a Participant upon or following a termination of employment unless such termination is also a “separation from service” within the meaning of Code Section 409A and, for purposes of any such provision of this Plan, references to a “termination,” “termination of employment” or like terms shall mean “separation from service.”

 

(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, if a Participant is a United States taxpayer and deemed to be a “specified employee” within the meaning of that term under Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B), then with regard to any payment that is considered “non-qualified deferred compensation” under Code Section 409A payable on account of a “separation from service,” such payment shall be made on the date which is the earlier of (i) the expiration of the six month period measured from the date of such “separation from service” of the Participant, and (ii) the date of the Participant’s death and (iii) the Participant’s Entitlement Date (the “Delay Period”) to the extent required under Section 409A. Upon the expiration of the Delay Period, all payments delayed pursuant to this Section 4.02(d) shall be paid to the Participant in a lump sum.

 

Article Five

GENERAL

 

Section 5.01    Effective Time of Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Plan shall be effective on June 27, 2018, as amended June 12, 2019.

 

Section 5.02    Amendment of Restricted Share Unit Plan: The Board or the Committee, as the case may be, may terminate, discontinue or amend the Plan at any time, provided that, without the consent of a Participant, such termination, discontinuance or amendment may not in any manner adversely affect such Participant’s rights under any Restricted Share Unit granted to such Participant under the Plan.

 

The Board or the Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory and shareholder approval, make the following amendments to the Plan or Restricted Share Units under the Plan:

 

(a) amendments to increase the number of Shares, other than by virtue of Section 5.06, which may be issued pursuant to the Plan;

 

(b) amendments to the definition of “Participant” under the Plan which would have the potential of narrowing, broadening or increasing Insider participation;’

 

(c) amendments to cancel and reissue Restricted Share Units;

 

(d) amendments to this Section 5.02 of the Plan;

 

(e) amendments that extend the term of a Restricted Share Units;

 

(f) amendments to the participation limits in Section 2.06; or

 

(g) amendments to Section 5.03 of the Plan that would permit Restricted Share Units, or any other right or interest of a Participant under the Plan, to be assigned or transferred, other than for normal estate settlement purposes.

 

 

- 11 -

 

The Board or the Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory approval (where required), but not subject to shareholder approval, in its sole discretion make all other amendments to the Plan or Restricted Share Units under the Plan that are not of the type contemplated above, including, without limitation:

 

(a) amendments of a housekeeping nature;

 

(b) amendments to the vesting provisions of a Restricted Share Unit or the Plan;

 

(c) amendments to the definitions, other than such definitions noted above;

 

(d) amendments to reflect changes to applicable securities laws; and

 

(e) amendments to ensure that the Restricted Share Units granted under the Plan will comply with any provisions respecting income tax and other laws in force in any country or jurisdiction of which a Participant to whom a Restricted Share Unit has been granted may from time to time be a resident, citizen or otherwise subject to tax therein.

 

Any amendment of this Plan shall be such that this Plan will not be considered a “salary deferral arrangement” as defined in subsection 248(1) of Income Tax Act (Canada) or any successor provision thereto, by reason of the Plan continuously meeting the requirements under the exception in paragraph (k) of that definition.

 

Section 5.03    Non-Assignable: Except as otherwise may be expressly provided for under this Plan or pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution, no Restricted Share Unit and no other right or interest of a Participant is assignable or transferable, and any such assignment or transfer in violation of this Plan shall be null and void.

 

Section 5.04    Rights as a Shareholder: No holder of any Restricted Share Units shall have any rights as a shareholder of the Corporation prior to the actual receipt of Shares pursuant to Section 3.03. Subject to Section 5.06, no holder of any Restricted Share Units shall be entitled to receive, and no adjustment shall be made for, any dividends, distributions or any other rights declared for shareholders of the Corporation for which the record date is prior to the date on which the Participant becomes the record owner of such Shares pursuant to Section 3.03.

 

Section 5.05    No Contract of Employment: Nothing contained in the Plan shall confer or be deemed to confer upon any Participant the right to continue in the employment of, or to provide services to, the Corporation or its Affiliates nor interfere or be deemed to interfere in any way with any right of the Corporation or its Affiliates to discharge any Participant at any time for any reason whatsoever, with or without just cause. Participation in the Plan by a Participant shall be voluntary.

 

Section 5.06    Adjustment in Number of Shares Subject to the Restricted Share Unit Plan: In the event there is any change in the Shares, whether by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification, an appropriate adjustment shall be made by the Committee in:

 

(a) the number of Shares available under the Plan; and

 

(b) the number of Shares subject to any Restricted Share Units.

 

If the foregoing adjustment shall result in a fractional Share, the fraction shall be disregarded. All such adjustments shall be conclusive, final and binding for all purposes of the Plan.

 

 

- 12 -

 

However, if there is an increase in the number of Shares outstanding for any reason other than by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification as described above (for example, as a result of a private placement of Shares or the issuance of Shares in connection with the acquisition of an asset) there will be no adjustment to the number of Shares that a Participant will receive under his or her Restricted Share Unit Grant Letter award and no adjustment to the number of Shares available under the Plan.

 

Section 5.07    Unfunded Plan. The Plan shall be unfunded. The Corporation’s obligations hereunder shall (unless otherwise determined by the Committee) constitute a general, unsecured obligation, payable solely out of its general assets, and no holder of any Restricted Share Units or other person shall have any right to any specific assets of the Corporation. Neither the Corporation nor the Committee shall be required to segregate any assets that may at any time be represented by the amounts credited with respect to Restricted Share Units hereunder. Neither the Corporation nor the Committee shall be deemed to be a trustee of any amounts to be distributed or paid pursuant to the Plan. No liability or obligation of the Corporation pursuant to the Plan shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge of, or encumbrance on, any property of the Corporation or any Affiliate.

 

Section 5.08    No Representation or Warranty: The Corporation makes no representation or warranty as to the future market value of any Shares issued in accordance with the provisions of the Plan. No amount will be paid to, or in respect of, a Participant under this Plan or pursuant to any other arrangement, and no additional Restricted Share Units will be granted to such Participant to compensate for a downward fluctuation in the price of the Shares, nor will any other form of benefit be conferred upon, or in respect of, a Participant for such purpose.

 

Section 5.09    Compliance with Applicable Law: If any provision of the Plan or any Restricted Share Unit contravenes any law or any order, policy, by-law or regulation of any regulatory body having jurisdiction, then such provision shall be deemed to be amended to the extent necessary to bring such provision into compliance therewith.

 

Section 5.10    Interpretation: This Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia.

 

 

- 13 -

 

Form of Grant Letter

 

[ORLA MINING LTD. LETTERHEAD]

 

[Date]

 

PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL

 

[Name]

[Address]

 

Dear [Name]:

 

The Corporation’s Restricted Share Unit Plan (the “Plan”) permits the Board, or a committee of the Board which administers the Plan, to grant restricted share unit awards to directors, consultants and full-time employees and officers of the Corporation or an affiliate in a calendar year as a bonus for services rendered to the Corporation or an affiliate in the fiscal year ending in such calendar year, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Board or such committee. The number of restricted share units (“RSUs”) awarded will be credited to your account effective on the grant date of the RSUs.

 

In recognition of your contribution to the Corporation, the Board is pleased to grant to you the RSUs on the terms set forth below and subject to the Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Schedule “A”.

 

This letter and the Plan are referred to collectively below as the “Restricted Share Unit Documents”. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning attributed to them in the Plan.

 

The total number of RSUs granted to you is:  

[Note: insert number]

     
     

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing and subject to Sections 3.03 of the Plan, provided that your employment with the Corporation has not been terminated, the RSUs granted to you shall fully vest on the following schedule l.

 

[NTD: Consider any other conditions in addition to time-based vesting.]

 

In the event of vesting pursuant to the schedule above, subject to the Plan, you shall receive in respect of each RSU held by you, [one fully-paid common share in the capital of the Corporation OR a cash payment equal to the Fair Market Value of one Share at such time, OR a combination thereof,][ntd: Company to determine settlement at time of grant, or make settlement in sole discretion of company.] in each case without payment of additional consideration and without any further action on your part.

 

 

- 14 -

 

Nothing in the Restricted Share Unit Documents will affect our right to terminate your services, responsibilities, duties and authority at any time for any reason whatsoever. The treatment of your RSUs upon termination or other events is detailed herein and in the Plan.

 

No RSU and no other right or interest of a Participant hereunder is assignable or transferable.

 

Please acknowledge acceptance of your RSUs on these terms by signing where indicated below on the enclosed copy of this letter and returning the signed copy to the Corporation to the attention of l. By signing and delivering this copy, you are acknowledging receipt of a copy of the Plan and are agreeing to be bound by all of the terms of the Restricted Share Unit Documents.

 

  Yours truly,
 
  ORLA MINING LTD.
 
  By:  

 

I have read and agree to be bound by this letter and the Plan.

 

     
Signature of Witness  
  [Name]
Name of Witness (please print)  
   
     
     
    Address

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.66

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

DEFERRED SHARE UNIT PLAN

 

EFFECTIVE JUNE 27, 2018, AMENDED JUNE 12, 2019

 

ARTICLE ONE

 

DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

 

Section 1.01 Definitions: For the purposes of the Plan, unless such word or term is otherwise defined herein or the context in which such word or term is used herein otherwise requires, the following words and terms with the initial letter or letters thereof capitalized shall have the following meanings:

 

(a) Affiliate” means any corporation that is an affiliate of the Corporation as defined in National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus and Registration Exemptions, as may be amended from time to time;

 

(b) Board” means the Board of Directors of the Corporation;

 

(c) Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

 

(d) Committee” means the Board or if the Directors so determine in accordance with Section 2.03 of the Plan, the committee of the Directors authorized to administer the Plan which may include any compensation committee of the Board;

 

(e) Corporation” means Orla Mining Ltd., a corporation existing under the Canada Business Corporations Act, and includes any successor corporation thereof;

 

(f) Deferred Share Unit” means the agreement by the Corporation to pay, and the right of the Participant to receive, a DSU Payment for each Deferred Share Unit held, evidenced by way of book-keeping entry in the books of the Corporation and administrated pursuant to this Plan;

 

(g) Director” means a member of the Board or a member of the board of directors of an Affiliate from time to time;

 

(h) DSU Grant Date” means the date of grant of Deferred Share Units by the Committee in accordance with Section 3.02;

 

(i) DSU Grant Letter” has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 3.03;

 

(j) DSU Payment” means, subject to any adjustment in accordance with Section 5.04, as determined by the Board or the Committee, in its sole discretion: (i) the issuance to a Participant of one previously unissued Share for each whole Deferred Share Unit held by the Participant on the Separation Date; (ii) the payment to a Participant of cash in an amount equal to the number of Deferred Share Units held by the Participant on the Separation Date multiplied by the Fair Market Value of one Share on the Redemption Date, or (iii) a combination thereof;

 

1

 

 

(k) Eligible Director” means a person who is a Director or a member of the board of directors of any Affiliate of the Corporation and who, at the relevant time, is not otherwise an employee or a consultant of the Corporation or of any Affiliate, and such person shall continue to be an Eligible Director for so long as such person continues to be a member of such board(s) of directors and is not otherwise an employee or a consultant of the Corporation or of any Affiliate;

 

(l) Fair Market Value” means, at any date, the higher of: (i) weighted average price per share at which the Shares have traded on the TSX during the last five (5) trading days prior to that date; and (ii) the closing price of the Shares on the TSX on the date prior to the relevant date or, if the Shares are not then listed and posted for trading on the TSX, then on such stock exchange on which the Shares are then listed and posted for trading as may be selected for such purpose by the Board, or, if the Shares are not then listed and posted for trading on any stock exchange, then it shall be the fair market value per Share as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion; and for such purposes, the weighted average price per share at which the Shares have traded on the TSX or on any other stock exchange shall be calculated by dividing: (i) the aggregate sale price for all of the Shares traded on such stock exchange during the relevant five (5) trading days by (ii) the aggregate number of Shares traded on such stock exchange during the relevant five (5) trading days;

 

(m) Insider” means an insider as defined in the TSX Company Manual;

 

(n) Market Value” means the closing trading price of the Shares on the DSU Grant Date or other applicable date, as reported by the TSX. If the Shares are not trading on the TSX, then the Market Value shall be determined based on the trading price on such stock exchange or over-the-counter market on which the Shares are listed and posted for trading as may be selected for such purpose by the Committee. In the event that the Shares are not listed and posted for trading on any stock exchange or over-the-counter market, the Market Value shall be the fair market value of such Shares as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion;

 

(o) Participant” means each Eligible Director to whom Deferred Share Units are issued;

 

(p) Plan” means this 2018 Deferred Share Unit Plan;

 

(q) Redemption Date” with respect to a Participant who had a Separation Date, means, subject to Section 3.05, such date as the Corporation determines which shall be no earlier than 30 days but no later than 60 days after the Separation Date (or no earlier than 30 days but no later than 60 days after the expiry of a blackout period if such blackout period was in effect on the Separation Date), provided, that with respect to a Participant who is United States taxpayer, if a blackout period was in effect on the Separation Date, the Redemption Date shall be no later than the later of (i) 60 days after the Separation Date or (ii) the first day following the end of the blackout period in which Shares are traded on the TSX or another stock exchange and provided further in no case may the Redemption Date be prior to the Separation Date or later than the last day of the calendar year commencing immediately after the Participant's Separation Date;

 

2

 

 

(r) Security Based Compensation Arrangement” includes, without limitation: (i) stock option plans for the benefit of employees, insiders, service providers or any one of such groups; (ii) individual stock options granted to employees, service providers or insiders if not granted pursuant to a plan previously approved by the Corporation’s security holders; (iii) stock purchase plans where the Corporation provides financial assistance or where the Corporation matches the whole or a portion of the securities being purchased; (iv) stock appreciation rights involving issuances of securities from treasury; (v) any other compensation or incentive mechanism involving the issuance or potential issuances of securities of the Corporation; and (vi) security purchases from treasury by an employee, insider or service provider which is financially assisted by the Corporation by any means whatsoever, but shall not include the 500,000 Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”;

 

(s) Separation Date” means the date on which the Participant ceases to be an Eligible Director for any reason whatsoever and is not an officer or employee of the Corporation or any Affiliate;

 

(t) Shares” means the shares of the Corporation;

 

(u) TSX” means the Toronto Stock Exchange;

 

(v) TSX Company Manual” means the TSX Company Manual setting forth the rules and policies of the TSX, as the same may be amended from time to time; and

 

(w) year” means a calendar year unless otherwise specified.

 

Section 1.02     Headings: The headings of all articles, Sections, and paragraphs in the Plan are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of this Plan.

 

Section 1.03    Context, Construction: Whenever the singular or masculine are used in the Plan, the same shall be construed as being the plural or feminine or neuter or vice versa where the context so requires.

 

Section 1.04     References to this Deferred Share Unit Plan: The words “hereto”, “herein”, “hereby”, “hereunder”, “hereof” and similar expressions mean or refer to this Plan as a whole and not to any particular article, Section, paragraph or other part hereof.

 

Section 1.05   Canadian Funds: Unless otherwise specifically provided, all references to dollar amounts in the Plan are references to Canadian dollars.

 

3

 

 

ARTICLE TWO

PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEFERRED SHARE PLAN

 

Section 2.01     Purpose of the Deferred Share Unit Plan: The purpose of this Plan is to strengthen the alignment of interests between the Eligible Directors and the shareholders of the Corporation by linking a portion of annual director compensation, as determined by the Committee from time to time, to the future value of the Shares. In addition, the Plan has been adopted for the purpose of advancing the interests of the Corporation through the motivation, attraction and retention of Directors of the Corporation and its Affiliates, it being generally recognized that the Plan aids in attracting, retaining and encouraging Director commitment and performance due to the opportunity offered to them to receive compensation in line with the value of the Shares.

 

Section 2.02     Administration of the Deferred Share Unit Plan: The Plan shall be administered by the Committee and the Committee shall have full discretionary authority to administer the Plan including the authority to interpret and construe any provision of the Plan and to adopt, amend and rescind such rules and regulations for administering the Plan as the Committee may deem necessary in order to comply with the requirements of the Plan. No member of the Committee shall be personally liable for any action taken or determination or interpretation made in good faith in connection with the Plan and all members of the Committee shall, in addition to their rights as Directors of the Corporation, be fully protected, indemnified and held harmless by the Corporation with respect to any such action taken or determination or interpretation made in good faith. All actions taken and all interpretations and determinations made by the Committee in good faith shall be final and conclusive and shall be binding on the Participants and the Corporation. The appropriate officers of the Corporation are hereby authorized and empowered to do all things and execute and deliver all instruments, undertakings and applications and writings as they, in their absolute discretion, consider necessary for the implementation of the Plan and of the rules and regulations established for administering the Plan. All costs incurred in connection with the Plan shall be for the account of the Corporation.

 

Section 2.03     Delegation to Committee: All of the powers exercisable hereunder by the Board may, to the extent permitted by applicable law and as determined by resolution of the Board, be exercised by the Committee.

 

Section 2.04     Record Keeping: The Corporation shall maintain a register in which shall be recorded:

 

(i) the name and address of each Participant in the Plan;

 

(ii) the number of Deferred Share Units granted to each Participant under the Plan;

 

(iii) the number of Deferred Share Units credited to a Participant pursuant to Section 3.04 hereof;

 

(iv) the date on which Deferred Share Units were granted or credited to a Participant;

 

(v) the Redemption Date of Deferred Shares Units; and

 

(vi) the form and amount of each DSU Payment.

 

Section 2.05     Compliance with Income Tax Act (Canada): Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan, all actions of the Board, the Committee and the Corporation shall be such that the Plan continuously meets the conditions in paragraph 6801(d) of the regulations under the Income Tax Act (Canada), or any successor provision, in order for the Plan to qualify as a “prescribed plan or arrangement” for the purposes of the definition of a “salary deferral arrangement” contained in subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada).

 

4

 

 

ARTICLE THREE

DEFERRED SHARE UNIT PLAN

 

Section 3.01     Deferred Share Unit Plan: A Deferred Share Unit Plan is established for Eligible Directors.

 

Section 3.02     Grant of Deferred Share Units: The Committee may grant to each Participant on each DSU Grant Date, that number of DSUs as determined by resolution of the Committee. The DSU Payment in respect of DSUs granted to an Eligible Participant may be satisfied, upon redemption in accordance with section 3.05, in the sole discretion of the Committee, in cash or by way of issuance of Shares from treasury or any combination thereof.

 

Section 3.03     Deferred Share Unit Letter: Each grant of Deferred Share Units under the Plan shall be evidenced by a letter of the Corporation (a “DSU Grant Letter”). Such Deferred Share Units shall be subject to all applicable terms and conditions of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms and conditions which are not inconsistent with the Plan and which the Committee deems appropriate for inclusion in a DSU Grant Letter. The provisions of the various DSU Grant Letters entered into under the Plan need not be identical, and may vary from Participant to Participant. To the extent that there is any inconsistency between the Plan and the Deferred Share Unit grant letter or any other communications, the Plan shall prevail.

 

Section 3.04     Dividends: Subject to the absolute discretion of the Committee, in the event that a dividend (other than a stock dividend) is declared and paid by the Corporation on Shares, the Committee may elect to credit each Participant with additional Deferred Share Units. In such case, the number of additional Deferred Share Units will be equal to the aggregate amount of dividends that would have been paid to the Participant if the Deferred Share Units in the Participant’s account had been Shares divided by the Market Value of a Share on the date on which dividends were paid by the Corporation.

 

Section 3.05     Redemption of Deferred Share Units:

 

(a) Subject to Sections 3.05(b) and 4.01, as soon as practicable following the Separation Date, each Deferred Share Unit held by a Participant who ceases to be an Eligible Director shall be redeemed by the Corporation on the relevant Redemption Date for a DSU Payment to be made to the Participant (or after the Participant’s death, a dependent, relative or legal representative of the Participant) on such Redemption Date on the basis of issue of one fully paid Share from treasury for each Deferred Share Unit held by a Participant, without any further action on the part of the holder of the Deferred Share Unit in accordance with this Article Three, less any applicable taxes and other source deductions required to be withheld by the Corporation.

 

(b) In the event that the Corporation elects to satisfy all or a part of the DSU Payment in cash, the Deferred Share Units shall be redeemed and payment made by the Corporation to the Participant subject to Section 4.01. The amount of the cash payment will be determined by multiplying the number of Deferred Share Units being redeemed for cash, by the Fair Market Value of one Share on the Redemption Date, less any applicable taxes and other source deductions required to be withheld by the Corporation.

 

(c) Fractional Deferred Share Units shall be cancelled for no consideration.

 

(d) For certainty, DSU Payments will be made on the applicable Redemption Date which shall be no later than December 31 of the year following the year of the Participant’s Separation Date.

 

5

 

 

Section 3.06     Maximum Number of Shares:

 

(a) The aggregate maximum number of Shares available for issuance from treasury under this Plan, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 5.04 hereof, shall not exceed 2,000,000. Under no circumstances may the number of Shares issuable pursuant to Deferred Share Units, together with Shares issuable under all Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, exceed 10% of the total number of Shares then outstanding. For purposes of this Section 3.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non-diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Deferred Share Unit.

 

(b) The maximum number of Deferred Share Units available for grant to any one person in a 12-month period pursuant to this Plan, and any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, is 5% of the total number of Shares then outstanding. For purposes of this Section 3.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non-diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Restricted Share Unit.

 

(c) The maximum number of Shares which may be issuable at any time to Insiders (as a group) pursuant to this Plan, or together with any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall be 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares at the time of grant. The maximum number of Shares which may be issued within any one year period to Insiders (as a group) pursuant to this Plan, or together with any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall be 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares. For purposes of this Section 3.06, the number of Shares then outstanding shall mean the number of Shares outstanding on a non-diluted basis immediately prior to the proposed grant of the applicable Deferred Share Unit.

 

(d) The maximum equity value of Deferred Share Units which may be granted to each Eligible Director, together with all Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, shall not exceed $150,000 (based on the Market Value of the Deferred Share Units) in any fiscal year.

 

(e) For purposes of determining the number of Shares that remain available for issuance under the Plan, the number of Shares underlying any grants of Deferred Share Units that are surrendered, forfeited, waived, repurchased by the Corporation and/or cancelled shall be added back to the Plan and again be available for future grant, whereas the number of Shares underlying any grants of Deferred Share Units that are issued shall not be available for future grant.

 

Section 3.07     Term of the Deferred Share Unit Plan: The Plan is effective as of June 27, 2018, as amended June 12, 2019. The Plan shall remain in effect until it is terminated by the Board, subject to the requirements of the stock exchange upon which the Shares of the Corporation are then listed. Upon termination of the Plan, the Corporation shall satisfy all obligations with respect to all remaining Deferred Share Units under Section 3.04 above, as at the applicable Separation Date for each of the remaining Participants.

 

Section 3.08     Blackout. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, in the event that any Separation Date occurs during, or within 48 hours after a self-imposed blackout period on the trading of securities of the Corporation, settlement of the applicable Deferred Share Units will occur on the applicable Redemption Date.

 

6

 

 

ARTICLE FOUR

TAX MATTERS

 

Section 4.01     Withholding Taxes: The Corporation or its Affiliates may take such steps as are considered necessary or appropriate for the withholding of any taxes which the Corporation or its Affiliate is required by any law or regulation of any governmental authority whatsoever to withhold in connection with any payment or delivery of Shares or cash made under this Plan including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the withholding of all or any portion of any payment or the withholding of the issue of Shares to be issued under the Plan, until such time as the Participant has paid the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation for any amount which the Corporation and its Affiliates are required to withhold with respect to such taxes. For greater certainty, immediately upon delivery of any Shares, the Corporation shall have the right to require that a Participant sell a given number of Shares to the Corporation or an Affiliate of the Corporation sufficient to cover any applicable withholding taxes and any other source deductions to be withheld by the Corporation in connection with payments made in satisfaction of the Participant’s vested Deferred Share Units.

 

Section 4.02     Code Section 409A. The Deferred Share Units are intended to be exempt from Code Section 409A as “short-term deferrals” and this Plan and all DSU Grant Letters shall be interpreted and administered accordingly. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall the Corporation or any of its Affiliates have any liability to any Participant for taxes, penalties or interest that may be assessed as a result of the application of Code Section 409A to any Deferred Share Units granted hereunder.

 

ARTICLE FIVE

GENERAL

 

Section 5.01     Amendment of Deferred Share Unit Plan: The Board or the Committee, as the case may be, may terminate, discontinue or amend the Plan at any time, provided that, without the consent of a Participant, such termination, discontinuance or amendment may not in any manner adversely affect such Participant’s rights under any Deferred Share Unit granted to such Participant under the Plan.

 

The Board or the Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory and shareholder approval, make the following amendments to the Plan or Deferred Share Units under the Plan:

 

(a) amendments to increase the number of Shares, other than by virtue of Section 5.04 of the Plan, which may be issued pursuant to the Plan;

 

(b) amendments to this Section 5.01 of the Plan;

 

(c) amendments to cancel and reissue Deferred Share Units;

 

(d) amendments that extend the term of a Deferred Share Unit;

 

(e) amendments to the participation limits in Section 3.06; or

 

(f) amendments that would permit Deferred Share Units to be transferred other than for normal estate settlement purposes; or

 

(g) materially modify the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan.

 

7

 

 

The Board or the Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory approval (where required), but not subject to shareholder approval, in its sole discretion make all other amendments to the Plan or Deferred Share Units under the Plan that are not of the type contemplated above, including, without limitation:

 

(a) amendments of a housekeeping nature;

 

(b) amendments to the definitions;

 

(c) amendments to reflect changes to applicable securities laws; and

 

(d) amendments to ensure that the Deferred Share Units granted under the Plan will comply with any provisions respecting income tax and other laws in force in any country or jurisdiction of which a Participant may from time to time be a resident, or otherwise subject to tax therein.

 

Section 5.02     Non-Assignable: Except as otherwise may be expressly provided for under this Plan or pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution, no Deferred Share Unit and no other right or interest of a Participant is assignable or transferable, and any such assignment or transfer in violation of this Plan shall be null and void.

 

Section 5.03     Rights as a Shareholder and Director: No holder of any Deferred Share Units shall have any rights as a shareholder of the Corporation at any time. Nothing in the Plan shall confer on any Eligible Director the right to continue as a Director of the Corporation or as a Director of any Affiliate of the Corporation or interfere with right to remove such Director.

 

Section 5.04     Adjustment in Number of Payments Subject to the Deferred Share Unit Plan: In the event there is any change in the Shares, whether by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision, reclassification or otherwise, an appropriate adjustment shall be made by the Committee in:

 

(a)       the number of Shares available under the Plan; and

 

(b)       the number of Shares subject to or underlying any Deferred Share Units.

 

If the foregoing adjustment shall result in a fractional Share, the fraction shall be disregarded. All such adjustments shall be conclusive, final and binding for all purposes of the Plan.

 

8

 

 

However, if there is an increase in the number of Shares outstanding for any reason other than by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification as described above (for example, as a result of a private placement of Shares or the issuance of Shares in connection with the acquisition of an asset) there will be no adjustment to the number of Shares that a Participant will receive under his or her Deferred Share Unit Grant Letter award and no adjustment to the number of Shares available under the Plan.

 

Section 5.05     Unfunded Plan. The Plan shall be unfunded. The Corporation’s obligations hereunder shall (unless otherwise determined by the Committee) constitute a general, unsecured obligation, payable solely out of its general assets, and no holder of any Deferred Share Units or other person shall have any right to any specific assets of the Corporation. Neither the Corporation nor the Committee shall be required to segregate any assets that may at any time be represented by the amounts credited with respect to Deferred Share Units hereunder. Neither the Corporation nor the Committee shall be deemed to be a trustee of any amounts to be distributed or paid pursuant to the Plan. No liability or obligation of the Corporation pursuant to the Plan shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge of, or encumbrance on, any property of the Corporation or any Affiliate.

 

Section 5.06     No Representation or Warranty: The Corporation makes no representation or warranty as to the future market value of any Deferred Share Units issued in accordance with the provisions of the Plan. No amount will be paid to, or in respect of, a Participant under this Plan or pursuant to any other arrangement, and no additional Deferred Share Units will be granted to such Participant to compensate for a downward fluctuation in the price of the Shares, nor will any other form of benefit be conferred upon, or in respect of, a Participant for such purpose.

 

Section 5.07     Compliance with Applicable Law: If any provision of the Plan contravenes any law or any order, policy, by-law or regulation of any regulatory body having jurisdiction, then such provision shall be deemed to be amended to the extent necessary to bring such provision into compliance therewith.

 

Section 5.08      Interpretation: This Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia.

 

9

 

 

Exhibit 99.67

 

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

ORLA MINING RAISES $3.6 MILLION THROUGH EARLY WARRANT EXERCISE INCENTIVE PROGRAM

 

THIS NEWS RELEASE IS INTENDED FOR DISTRIBUTION IN CANADA ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES

 

VANCOUVER, BC – July 15, 2019 – Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the “Company”) is pleased to report that its previously announced early warrant exercise incentive program (“Incentive Program”) has resulted in total gross proceeds to Orla of $3,622,350. Approximately 5.8 million of its warrants having an exercise price of $0.62 and expiring on July 8, 2021 (the “2021 Warrants”) have been exercised, representing 87% of the total number of 2021 Warrants that were outstanding at the start of the Incentive Program which began on June13, 2019 and closed on July 12, 2019. The Incentive Program resulted in Orla issuing 5,842,500 common shares and 5,842,500 full new warrants (the “Incentive Warrant”). Each Incentive Warrant is exercisable into one common share at a price of $1.65 for a period of 3 years, expiring June 12, 2022.

 

“We are pleased with the results of the program and thank the warrantholders for their overwhelming support,” stated Jason Simpson, President and CEO. “The funds will be used to continue regional exploration and allow greater flexibility prior to construction of the Camino Rojo Oxide Project.”

 

The remaining 895,000 2021 Warrants that were not exercised under the Incentive Program will remain outstanding and continue to entitle the holder to acquire one common share of Orla at the exercise price of $0.62 until July 8, 2021.

 

GMP Securities L.P. acted as financial advisor to Orla with respect to the transaction.

 

The Incentive Warrants, the underlying securities issuable upon exercise of the Incentive Warrants, the 2021 Warrants and the Common Shares issued upon exercise of the 2021 Warrants have not been, and will not be, registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "U.S. Securities Act") or any U.S. state securities laws, and may not be exercised, as applicable, or offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, United States persons absent registration or any applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable U.S. state securities laws. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in the United States, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 200,000 hectares. The results of the Feasibility Study on the Camino Rojo Oxide Project were released on June 25, 2019 and the NI 43-101 Technical Report will be made available on SEDAR within the applicable timeframe. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the "Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits" dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 1240- 1140 Pender St. W, Vancouver BC V6E 4G1
www.orlamining.com 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Canadian and United States federal and state securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the use of proceeds received as part of the early warrant incentive program, and the timing of a construction decision. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts but which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company's management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

Email: info@orlamining.com

Tel: 604-564-1852

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 1240- 1140 Pender St. W, Vancouver BC V6E 4G1
www.orlamining.com 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.68

  

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

  

ORLA MINING ANNOUNCES POSITIVE FEASIBILITY STUDY RESULTS FOR
THE CAMINO ROJO OXIDE GOLD PROJECT 

 

VANCOUVER, BC - June 25, 2019 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) ("Orla" or the "Company") is pleased to provide the results of a positive Feasibility Study along with Orla’s first mineral reserve estimate on its 100%-owned Camino Rojo Oxide Project located in Zacatecas, Mexico. The Feasibility Study supports a technically simple open-pit mine and heap-leach operation with low capital and operating costs providing rapid payback and a strong financial return.

 

 

Feasibility Study Highlights

 

Table 1: Feasibility Study Highlights

 

Throughput Rate per Day   18,000 tonnes  
Total Ore to Leach Pad   44.0 M tonnes  
Average Grade Au / Ag (g/t)   0.73 / 14.2  
Contained Gold / Silver Ounces   1,031,000 / 20,093,000  
Average Recovery Au / Ag   64% / 17%  
Average Annual Gold Production   97,000 ounces  
Strip Ratio (waste : ore)   0.54  
Initial Capex   $123 million  
Avg. LOM Operating costs (per tonne of ore processed)   $8.43  
Total By-Product Cash Cost1 ($/oz Au)   $515  
All-In Sustaining Cost (“AISC”)1 ($/oz Au)   $576  
Pre -Tax - Net Present Value (5%)   $227 million  
Pre-Tax Internal Rate of Return   38.6%  
After-Tax - Net Present Value (5%)   $142 million  
After-Tax Internal Rate of Return   28.7%  
Payback   3.0 years  

 

1 Includes royalties payable, by-product cash cost and AISC are non-IFRS measures. See below for additional details.

 

The Feasibility Study was conducted using $1,250/oz gold and $17/oz silver and is expressed in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.

 

“The completion of the feasibility study for the Camino Rojo Oxide Project marks an important milestone for Orla and substantial progress toward construction of the Company’s first mine”, stated Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Orla. “The results demonstrate robust project economics with low development capital and a straight-forward path to approximately 100,000 ounces of expected annual gold production. We will be working towards submitting environmental assessment and permitting documents and securing project finance over the upcoming months with the expectation to deliver gold by mid-2021. With the continued support of local communities and stakeholders, we have a fantastic opportunity to develop a quality mine. We are also considering ways to unlock value from a much larger sulphide mineral resource and have initiated exploration on other priority targets on our extensive concession area”, added Mr. Simpson.

 

1

 

 

 

 

The new mineral reserve estimate at Camino Rojo includes proven and probable mineral reserves of 44.0 million tonnes at a gold grade of 0.73 grams per tonne (“g/t”) and a silver grade of 14.2 g/t, for total mineral reserves of 1.03 million ounces of gold and 20.1 million ounces of silver. All mineral reserves are contained and accessible from within Orla’s mineral concessions.

 

Updated measured and indicated mineral resources, inclusive of mineral reserves, amount to 353.4 million tonnes at 0.83 g/t gold and 8.83 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 9.46 million ounces of gold and 100.4 million ounces of silver. Inferred mineral resources are 60.9 million tonnes at 0.87 g/t gold and 7.41 g/t silver, resulting in an estimated 1.70 million ounces of gold and 14.5 million ounces of silver. Further details on the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates are provided below.

 

Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

The Camino Rojo Feasibility Study considers near-surface open pit mining of 44.0 million tonnes of oxide and transitional ore at a throughput rate of 18,000 tonnes per day. Ore from the pit will be crushed to 80% passing 28 mm, conveyor stacked onto a heap leach pad and leached using a low concentration sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant where gold and silver will be precipitated and doré will be produced. The site’s proximity to infrastructure, low stripping ratio, compact footprint and flat pad location all contribute to project simplicity and relatively low estimated AISC of $576 per ounce of gold.

 

The Feasibility Study was prepared by a team of independent industry experts led by Kappes Cassiday and Associates (“KCA”) and supported by Independent Mining Consultants (“IMC”), Resource Geosciences Incorporated (“RGI”), Barranca Group LLC, Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd. and HydroGeoLogica Inc (HGL).

 

The Feasibility Study incorporates geological, assay, engineering, metallurgical, geotechnical, environmental and hydrogeological information collected by Orla and previous owners since 2007, including 370,566 metres of drilling in 911 holes. Predicted average gold recoveries of 64% are based on results from 85 column tests.

 

Operating costs are based on contract mining with all other mine components being owned and operated by Orla. Capital costs were estimated primarily using budgetary supplier quotes for all major and most minor equipment as well as contractor quotes for major construction contracts.

 

2

 

 

 

 

The following table presents the key assumptions and detailed results of the Feasibility Study:

 

Table 2: Summary of Key Assumptions and Economics of the Camino Rojo Feasibility Study

 

Production Data   Values     Units
Life of Mine     6.8     Years
Mine Throughput     18,000     Tonnes/day
Mine Throughput     6,570,000     Tonnes/year
Total Tonnes to Crusher     44,020,000     Tonnes
Grade Au (Average)     0.73     g/t
Grade Ag (Average)     14.2     g/t
Contained Gold oz     1,031,000     Ounces
Contained Silver oz     20,093,000     Ounces
Metallurgical Recovery Gold (Overall)     64     %
Metallurgical Recovery Silver (Overall)     17     %
Average Annual Gold Production     97,000     Ounces
Average Annual Silver Production     511,000     Ounces
Total Gold Produced     662,000     Ounces
Total Silver Produced     3,479,000     Ounces
LOM Strip Ratio     0.54     Waste : Ore

 

Operating Costs (Average LOM)          
Mining (mined)   $ 2.14     /Tonne mined
Mining (processed)   $ 3.30     /Tonne processed
Processing & Support   $ 3.38     /Tonne processed
G&A   $ 1.75     /Tonne processed
Total Operating Cost   $ 8.43     /Tonne processed
By-Product Cash Cost   $ 515     /Ounce Au
All-in Sustaining Cost   $ 576     /Ounce Au

 

Capital Costs (Excluding value added tax)          
Initial Capital   $ 123     million
LOM Sustaining Capital   $ 20     million
LOM Capital   $ 144     million
Working Capital & Initial Fills   $ 10     million
Closure Costs   $ 20     million

 

Financial Analysis          
Gold Price Assumption   $ 1,250     /Ounce
Silver Price Assumption   $ 17     /Ounce
Average Annual Cashflow (Pre-Tax)   $ 72     million
Average Annual Cashflow (After-Tax)   $ 56     million
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pre-Tax     38.6 %   %
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax     28.7 %   %
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax)   $ 227     million
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax)   $ 142     million
Pay-Back Period (After-Tax)     3.0     Years

 

Note: See reference below regarding non-IFRS metrics. Feasibility Study economics include a 2% royalty and use a USD:MXN exchange rate of 19.3.

 

3

 

 

 

  

The proposed mine is located 3 kilometres from a paved 4-lane highway and approximately 190 kilometres from the city of Zacatecas. The area is flat and there are no known social or environmental impediments to mining. Orla has all surface, mineral and water rights to develop the project as presented in the Feasibility Study and existing wells produce in excess of the average 24 liters per second of water required for the project.

 

There are no residents within the area of proposed development. The town of San Tiburcio is located 4 kilometres to the east of the proposed development. Orla has a Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement with the San Tiburcio ejido and a 30-year temporary occupation right with an expropriation right over the 2,497 hectares covering the proposed pit and infrastructure area. Orla has an active community and social program in San Tiburcio and other nearby communities of El Berrendo and San Francisco.

 

Required permit applications are substantially completed and are expected to be submitted in the third quarter of 2019. The construction of the Camino Rojo Oxide Project is expected to start in the first half of 2020 upon receipt of all required permits and project financing. First gold production is planned for mid 2021.

  

Sensitivity to Gold Price

 

Table 3: Project Economics Sensitivities to Gold Price

 

Gold Price ($/oz) $1,150 $1,200 $1,250 $1,300 $1,350 $1,400
After-tax NPV 5% ($M) $109 $125 $142 $158 $174 $190
After-tax IRR (%) 24.0% 26.4% 28.7% 31.0% 33.2% 35.4%
Payback (years) 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.6

 

Comparison to the May 2018 Preliminary Economic Assessment

 

On May 29, 2018, Orla announced the results of a Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) on the Camino Rojo Project. The PEA operational plan was also based on an open pit mine, 2-stage crushing and heap leach recovery of gold and silver. In addition to much more detailed and rigorous cost estimations, engineering and project definition, the Feasibility Study benefited from the results of an additional 18 column leach tests, geotechnical evaluations including test pits and drilling under proposed infrastructure, geotechnical evaluations of pit slopes, ground water evaluations and testing of rock geochemistry to allow closure planning.

 

In addition to the higher level of confidence in key operational and economic parameters, changes from the PEA to the Feasibility Study include:

 

· Increase of the north pit wall angle to 53° for the entire wall below the first few benches versus 45° for all but the bottommost benches in the PEA. This results in a deeper pit, increased tonnage of material to be processed, and an overall increase in contained gold and silver ounces.

 

· Decrease in projected gold recoveries from 67% in the PEA to 64% in the Feasibility Study as the deeper pit results in a higher proportion of transitional material with lower than average recovery. The recovery model was also updated with the new leach column data.

 

4

 

 

 

 

Opportunities

 

The mine plan in the Feasibility Study was developed entirely on Orla’s mineral concessions and constrained by the property boundary. An agreement with the owner of the concession bordering Orla’s to the north would allow for the open pit to extend onto the adjacent concession. Such agreement would result in an expanded pit with access to additional oxide and transitional material deeper into the pit, which would add to the mine life and/or annual throughput with only modest equipment and infrastructure additions. Orla remains optimistic that an agreement can be reached with the owner of the adjacent concession.

 

The Feasibility Study only considers oxide and transitional material as testing shows gold cannot be economically recovered by the heap leach method from sulphide material. Orla is actively working on studies to investigate economic opportunities that may exist within the 7.3 million ounces of gold contained within the sulphide measured and indicated mineral resources.

 

Orla has title to mineral concessions covering a very large area around the Camino Rojo deposit. Overburden makes exploration challenging, but the discovery in 2007 of mineralization that is incorporated into this Feasibility Study and mineral resource estimate shows that shallow cover can hide very large near-surface deposits. Orla has been trying various exploration techniques and Induced Polarization (“IP”) geophysics appears to be the most useful tool. A large area southeast of the current mineral resource has recently been surveyed and drilling on the anomalies identified is expected to start within the next two months. Additional oxide material in the vicinity of the planned development would leverage the infrastructure being proposed in the Feasibility Study. Any additional sulphide material could add to the long-term potential of the property.

  

Capital and Operating Costs

 

Initial capital expenditures or pre-production capital for the Camino Rojo project is estimated at $123 million. Camino Rojo benefits from flat terrain and simple infrastructure limiting the amount of earthwork required during construction. Total capital for the life of the project, including working capital is estimated at $154 million. The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the capital costs for the project.

 

5

 

 

 

  

Table 4: Capital Cost Summary (excl. value added tax)

 

Description   Cost (US$)  
Pre-Production Capital   $ 80,231,000  
Indirect Costs   $ 7,645,000  
Other Owner’s Costs   $ 7,922,000  
EPCM   $ 8,544,000  
Contingency   $ 15,751,000  
Mining Contractor Mobilization & Preproduction   $ 3,022,000  
Total Initial Capital   $ 123,114,000  
Working Capital & Initial Fills   $ 10,187,000  
Sustaining Capital – Mine & Process   $ 20,424,000  
Total LOM Capital (incl. working capital)   $ 153,725,000  
Closure Costs   $ 19,813,000  

 

The average life of mine operating cost for the Project is $8.43 per tonne of ore processed. Operating costs were estimated from first principles with project specific staffing, quoted contract mining costs, unit consumptions of materials, supplies, power, water and delivered supply costs being considered.

 

The table below breaks down the different components of the operating costs:

 

Table 5: Life of Mine Operating Cost Summary

 

Description  

LOM Cost

($/t processed)

 
Mine   $ 3.30  
Process & Support Services   $ 3.38  
Site G & A   $ 1.75  
Total   $ 8.43  

  

Permitting

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by the federal government department known as SEMARNAT, which has authority over the two principal permits: The Environmental Impact Statement (Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental or MIA, accompanied by a Risk Study); and a Change of Land Use permit accompanied by a Technical Justification Study or ETJ.

 

In early 2018, Orla resumed environmental assessment activities on the project and surrounding area under the guidance of independent environmental permitting consultant Patricia Aguayo. Data from this work has been used in conjunction with information collected by previous operators and project information from Orla’s consulting engineers to prepare the documents needed to apply for the MIA and Change of Land Use permits. Submission of permitting documents to SEMARNAT is anticipated during the third quarter of 2019.

 

6

 

 

 

 

The project is not located in an area with any special federal environmental protection designation and no factors have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required environmental permits. The legislated timelines for the review of properly prepared MIA and Change of Land Use applications and mine operating permits for a project that does not affect federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves are 120 calendar days and 105 working days, respectively, which can be completed concurrently. 

 

Orla has contracted ERM, a global consulting company, to review the environmental assessment and proposed mitigation measures for the project. Orla plans to complete this work in accordance with International Finance Corporation Performance Standards, as well as the International Council on Mining and Metals principles. 

 

Next Steps

 

With the Feasibility Study now complete, permit applications can be completed and are expected to be submitted in the coming weeks. Orla is acquiring bids for a contract to provide engineering and procurement support (“EPCM”) to the project. Construction-level engineering and procurement efforts will be initiated in the third quarter of 2019 to meet the goal of starting construction in the first half of 2020.

 

Finally, Orla is working with its advisors to develop an optimum financing structure to finance the development of the project. The process is progressing well, and discussions are underway with various lenders and financiers. 

 

Mineral Reserves

 

Camino Rojo comprises intrusive related, sedimentary strata hosted, polymetallic gold, silver, arsenic, zinc, and lead mineralization. The mineralized zones correspond to zones of sheeted sulphidic veins and veinlet networks, creating a bulk-mineable style of gold mineralization. Mineralization is almost completely oxidized to a depth of approximately 120 metres and then variably oxidized below (transitional to sulphide). The mineral resource estimate was divided into oxide, high and low transitional and sulphide material. Only the oxide and transitional material were considered in the Feasibility Study for heap leach extraction.

 

The mineral reserve estimate for Camino Rojo is based on an open pit mine plan and mine production schedule developed by IMC. All mineral reserves are located on, and are accessible from, Orla’s concessions and support the 6.8-year mine life.

 

The following table presents the initial mineral reserve estimation for the Camino Rojo Oxide Project. Proven and probable mineral reserves amount to 44.0 million tonnes at 0.73 g/t gold and 14.2 g/t silver for 1.03 million contained gold ounces and 20.1 million contained silver ounces. The mineral reserve was estimated based on a gold price of $1,250 per ounce and a silver price of $17.00 per ounce. Measured mineral resource in the mine production schedule was converted to proven mineral reserve and indicated mineral resource in the schedule was converted to probable mineral reserve.

 

7

 

 

 

 

Table 6: Camino Rojo Mineral Reserves

 

Reserve Class  

000's

tonnes

    Gold
(g/t)
    Silver
(g/t)
    Gold
(koz)
    Silver
(koz)
 
Proven Mineral Reserve     14,595       0.79       15.1       369.7       7,104  
Probable Mineral Reserve     29,424       0.70       13.7       661.1       12,991  
Total Proven & Probable Reserve     44,019       0.73       14.2       1,031.0       20,095  

 

Notes: 

1. The mineral reserve estimate has an effective date of June 24, 2019. Mineral reserves are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards – For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council (as amended) in accordance with the disclosure requirement of NI 43-101.

2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding.

3. Mineral reserves are based on prices of $1,250/oz gold, $17/oz silver, USD/MXN exchange rate of 19.3.

4. Mineral reserves are based on net smelter return cut-off that vary by time period to balance mine and plant production capacities. They range from a low of $4.73/t to a high of $9.00/t.

5. Operating costs - mining $1.94/t mined; process $3.41/t processed; G&A $1.32/t processed, includes a 2% royalty.

6. Recoveries for gold – Kp 70%, Ki 56%, Transition Hi 60%; Transition Lo 40%; Recoveries for silver - Kp 11%, Ki 15%, TrHi 27%, TrLo 34%.

7. Gold and silver 100% payable; Refining cost per ounce – Au $5.00; Ag $0.50/oz.

  

Mineral Resources

 

As part of the Feasibility Study efforts, IMC updated the mineral resource estimate from the previous estimate prepared as of April 27, 2018 and previously reported in Orla’s May 29, 2018 news release. Mineral resources were divided between oxide and transitional material that could possibly be extracted by open pit mine and processed in a heap leach operation (“Leach Resource”) and sulphide material that could possibly be extracted by open pit and processed in a mill (“Mill Resource”). For the Mill Resource, estimates were made for contained gold, silver, lead and zinc. As lead and zinc would not be recovered in a heap leach operation, only gold and silver were estimated for the Leach Resource. Tables 7 and 8 below summarize the mineral resource estimate.

  

8

 

 

 

 

Table 7: Mineral Resource Estimate – Gold & Silver

 

Resource Type   000's
tonnes
    Gold
(g/t)
    Silver
(g/t)
    Gold
(koz)
     Silver
(koz)
 
Leach Resource:                                        
Measured Mineral Resource     19,391       0.77       14.9       482.3       9,305  
Indicated Mineral Resource     75,249       0.70       12.2       1,680.7       29,471  
Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     94,640       0.71       12.7       2,163.0       38,776  
Inferred Mineral Resource     4,355       0.86       5.6       119.8       805  
                                         
Mill Resource:                                        
Measured Mineral Resource     3,358       0.69       9.2       74.2       997  
Indicated Mineral Resource     255,445       0.88       7.4       7,221.4       60,606  
Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     258,803       0.88       7.4       7,295.6       61,603  
Inferred Mineral Resource     56,564       0.87       7.5       1,576.9       13,713  
                                         
Total Mineral Resource                                        
Measured Mineral Resource     22,749       0.76       14.1       556.5       10,302  
Indicated Mineral Resource     330,694       0.84       8.5       8,902.1       90,078  
Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     353,443       0.83       8.8       9,458.6       100,379  
Inferred Mineral Resource     60,919       0.87       7.4       1,696.7       14,518  

 

9

 

 

 

 

Table 8: Mineral Resource Estimate – Zinc & Lead

 

Resource Type   000's
tonnes
    Lead
(%)
    Zinc
(%)
    Lead
(M lbs)
    Zinc
(M lbs)
 
Mill Resource:                                        
Measured Mineral Resource     3,358       0.13       0.38       9.3       28.2  
Indicated Mineral Resource     255,445       0.07       0.26       404.3       1,468.7  
Meas./Ind. Mineral Resource     258,803       0.07       0.26       413.6       1,496.8  
Inferred Mineral Resource     56,564       0.05       0.23       63.1       290.4  

 

Notes:

1. The mineral resource has an effective date of June 7, 2019. The mineral resources are classified in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards in accordance with the disclosure requirement of NI 43-101

2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding.

3. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

4. Mineral resources for leach material are based on prices of $1,400/oz gold and $20/oz silver.

5. Mineral resources for mill material are based on prices of $1,400/oz gold, $20/oz silver, $1.05/lb lead, and $1.20/lb zinc.

6. Mineral resources are based on net smelter return cut-off of $4.73/t for leach material and $13.71/t for mill material.

7. Includes 2% royalty and an USD:MXN exchange rate of 19.3.

8. Operating costs for Leach resource - mining $1.65/t mined; process $3.41/t processed; G&A $1.32/t processed; Operating costs for Mill resource - mining $1.65/t mined; process $12.50/t processed; G&A $1.20/t processed

9. Leach resource payable – Au 100%; Ag 100%; Mill resource payable – Au 95%, Ag 95%, Pb 95%, Zn 85%

10.Leach resource refining costs - Au $5.00/oz; Ag $0.50/oz; Mill resource refining costs - Au $1.00/oz; Ag $1.50/oz; Pb $0.194/lb; Zn $0.219/lb

11.The mineral resource estimate assumes that the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto land held by the adjacent owner. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the adjacent owner.

12.Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves.

13. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an indicated mineral resource and must not be converted to a mineral reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated mineral resources with continued exploration.

 

10

 

 

 

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate “reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction” extends onto lands where mineral title is held by an adjacent owner and that waste would be mined on the adjacent owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that would include an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate (oxide and sulphide material) would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with that property owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the adjacent property owner. Delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources that are not included in the Feasibility Study, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Orla intends to seek an agreement with the adjacent owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that Orla will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to Orla or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. The development of the scenario presented in the Feasibility Study, including the mineral reserve estimate, does not require a layback agreement with the adjacent owner. 

 

Project Risks

 

The Company is not aware of any factors which would prevent a project similar to that modelled in the Feasibility Study from being carried out. There is a risk that permitting will take longer than the legislated timeline which could result in project delays. Social issues have caused delays to some projects in Mexico. Orla has an active community and social program and has maintained good relationships with local communities. In addition to being good corporate policy, the Company considers this to be the best way to reduce social risk. 

 

Data Verification

 

The sampling data used for the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimate was verified by IMC and RGI.  A substantial portion of the database was compared with original assay certificates. There were no limitations on the verification process. IMC and RGI are of the opinion that the database is acceptable for the purpose of the Feasibility Study, including the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimation. The Orla sampling data used for the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimate was verified by RGI.

 

KCA checked the metallurgical test procedures and results to ensure they met industry standards. Metallurgical sample locations were reviewed to ensure that there was material from throughout the resource area and that samples were reasonably representative of the material planned to be processed so as to support the selected process method and assumptions regarding recoveries and costs.  Additional data verification information can be found in the Amended Camino Rojo Technical Report dated March 11, 2019 and will be incorporated in the new Camino Rojo Technical Report that will be filed within 45 days of this release. 

 

Qualified Persons

 

The Feasibility Study was overseen by KCA of Reno, NV. The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates were conducted by IMC of Tucson, AZ, under the direction of Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM. Mr. Hester was also responsible for the mining components of the Feasibility Study. KCA, under the direction of Carl Defilippi, RM SME was responsible for the metallurgy, process, general and administration and economic components of the Feasibility Study. Matthew Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. (AIPG), of Resource Geosciences Incorporated of Rio Rico, AZ was responsible for the property, geology and environmental components of the Feasibility Study. David Hawkins, C.P.G. (AIPG), was responsible for the hydrogeology model. Each of Messrs. Hester, Defilippi, Gray and Hawkins is a Qualified Person for their respective sections of the Feasibility Study and each of whom is Independent of Orla under the definitions of NI 43-101. An independent technical report prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 will be available under Orla’s profile on SEDAR within 45 days of this news release.

 

Hans Smit, P.Geo. Chief Operating Officer of Orla, has reviewed and verified all technical and scientific information contained in this news release and is a Qualified Person within the meaning of NI 43-101.

 

The technical information in this news release has also been reviewed and approved by Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM, Carl Defilippi, RM SME, Matthew Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G (AIPG), and David Hawkins, C.P.G. (AIPG), each of whom is an Independent Qualified Person under NI 43-101.

 

11

 

 

 

 

Conference Call

 

Orla will host a conference call on June 25, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. eastern time, to discuss the results of the Feasibility Study:

 

Toll-free dial-in number (Canada/US): 1-800-806-5484
Local dial-in number: 416-406-0743
Passcode: 7505644#

 

Instant replay:

Toll-free dial-in number (Canada/US): 1-800-408-3053
Local dial-in number: 905-694-9451
Passcode: 9353369#
Expiry date: September 25, 2019 

 

About Orla Mining

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned and covers over 200,000 hectares. The Amended Technical Report for Camino Rojo dated March 11, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile. A NI 43-101 updated Technical Report supporting the Feasibility Study presented herein will be available on SEDAR within 45 days of this news release. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

On behalf of the Board of Directors 

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

www.orlamining.com

info@orlamining.com 

 

12

 

 

 

 

Forward-looking and Cautionary Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the results of the Feasibility Study, including but not limited to the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation, mine plan and operations, internal rate of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present value, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, production data and economic potential; the timing and costs for production decisions; financing timelines and requirements; permitting timelines and requirements; requirements for additional land; exploration and planned exploration programs, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources; upside opportunities including pit wall angles, land agreements, the development of the sulphide mineral resource and exploration potential; timing for start of construction, receipt of permits; timing for first gold production; and the Company's objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions regarding the price of gold and silver; the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimations; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required permits and approvals will be obtained; that social or environmental issues might exist, are well understood and will be properly managed; and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, including changes in the economic parameters; risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits; risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses, as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company’s most recently filed management’s discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 28, 2019, available on www.sedar.com. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change. 

 

Non-IFRS Measures

 

The Company has included certain non-IFRS performance measures as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers and the non-IFRS measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.

 

Cash Costs per Ounce – the Company calculated cash costs per ounce by dividing the sum of operating costs, royalty costs, production taxes, refining and shipping costs, net of by-product silver credits, by payable gold ounces. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, the Company believes that this measure will be useful to external users in assessing operating performance.

 

All-In Sustaining Costs (“AISC”) – the Company has disclosed an AISC performance measure that reflects all of the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, the Company's definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. The Company believes that this measure will be useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the ability to generate free cash flow from current operations. 

 

13

 

Exhibit 99.69

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

 

ORLA MINING ANNOUNCES VOTING RESULTS FROM ITS ANNUAL
SHAREHOLDER MEETING AND COMMENCEMENT OF EARLY WARRANT
EXERCISE INCENTIVE PROGRAM

 

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES.

 

VANCOUVER, BC – June 12, 2019 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) ("Orla" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the voting results for the election of its Board of Directors, which took place at the Company’s Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders (“AGM”) held today. All nominees as set forth in the Company’s management proxy circular dated May 9, 2019 (“Circular”) were elected as directors of Orla at the AGM. Detailed results of the votes are set out below:

 

Nominee   Votes For     %     Withheld     %  
Charles Jeannes     129,138,157       99.73 %     354,650       0.27 %
Richard Hall     129,138,157       99.73 %     354,650       0.27 %
Jason Simpson     129,138,157       99.73 %     354,650       0.27 %
Jean Robitaille     129,484,157       99.99 %     8,650       0.01 %
George Albino     129,138,057       99.73 %     354,750       0.27 %
Tim Haldane     129,138,057       99.73 %     354,750       0.27 %
David Stephens     129,138,057       99.73 %     354,750       0.27 %
Elizabeth McGregor     129,484,157       99.99 %     8,650       0.01 %

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver BC www.orlamining.com 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

The shareholders also approved: (1) the appointment of Davidson & Company LLP as auditors and authorized the Board of Directors to fix their remuneration; (2) amendments to the Company’s existing Stock Option Plan; (3) amendments to the Company’s Restricted Share Unit Plan; (4) amendments to the Company’s Deferred Share Unit Plan; (5) implementation of the Company’s Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program. Results of the shareholder votes on these items are set forth below:

 

    Outcome of
Vote
    Votes For     %     Withheld/
Against
    %  
Appointment of Auditors     Carried       131,114,385       100.00 %     4,739       0.00 %
Re-approval of Option Plan     Carried       125,046,680       96.57 %     4,446,127       3.43 %
Re-approval of RSU Plan     Carried       125,011,680       96.54 %     4,481,127       3.46 %
Re-approval of DSU Plan     Carried       128,966,680       99.59 %     526,127       0.41 %
Approval of Early Warrant Exercise program     Carried       83,982,930 *     99.40 %     509,877       0.60 %

* Disinterested Shareholders votes. Excludes 45 million shares held by Shareholders holding warrants.

 

Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program to Commence June 13, 2019

 

As previously announced on May 14, 2019, the Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program (“Incentive Program”) for the 6,737,500 warrants outstanding having an exercise price of $0.62 and expiring on July 8, 2021 (the “2021 Warrants”) will begin on June 13, 2019. The Incentive Program is designed to encourage the early exercise of the unlisted 2021 Warrants during a 30-day early exercise period (the “Incentive Period”) ending on July 12, 2019.

 

Under the Incentive Program, holders of the 2021 Warrants (the “Warrantholders”) will be entitled to receive one full new warrant (the “Incentive Warrant”) upon the exercise of each 2021 Warrant during the Incentive Period. Each Incentive Warrant will be exercisable into one common share of Orla at a price of $1.65 for a period of 3 years, expiring on June 12, 2022.

 

Each Warrantholder of record will be receiving additional information regarding the Incentive Program in the coming days.

 

For further details regarding this program and the use of proceeds, please refer to the news release dated May 14, 2019 and the management information circular dated May 9, 2019.

 

The Incentive Warrants, the underlying securities issuable upon exercise of the Incentive Warrants, the 2021 Warrants and the underlying common shares issued upon exercise of the 2021 Warrants have not been, and will not be, registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "U.S. Securities Act") or any U.S. state securities laws, and may not be exercised, as applicable, or offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, United States persons absent registration or any applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable U.S. state securities laws.

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver BC www.orlamining.com 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in the United States, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

 

Orla has determined that while the Incentive Program may be a related party transaction pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Special Transactions (“MI 61-101”), Orla is not required to obtain a formal valuation under subsection 5.4(1) of MI 61-101 or minority approval under subsection 5.7(1)(a) of MI 61-101 because pursuant to the exemptions set forth in MI 61-101, neither the fair market value nor the fair market value of the consideration paid for the 2021 Warrants exceeds 25% of the Company’s market capitalization.

 

Advisor

 

GMP Securities L.P. is acting as financial advisor to Orla with respect to the Incentive Program.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 200,000 hectares. The Feasibility Study on the Camino Rojo Oxide Project is expected to be completed by mid-year 2019. The Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report for Camino Rojo dated March 11, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company's profile. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the "Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits" dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States federal and state securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the terms, timing and expected amount of proceeds the be received as part of the Incentive Program, the timing of completion of the Camino Rojo Oxide Project Feasibility Study and the timing of a construction decision. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts but which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver BC www.orlamining.com 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson

Chief Executive Officer

 

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

Email: info@orlamining.com

Tel: 604-564-1852

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver BC www.orlamining.com 4

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.70 

 

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

   

ORLA MINING ANNOUNCES VOTING RESULTS FROM ITS ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING AND COMMENCEMENT OF EARLY WARRANT EXERCISE INCENTIVE PROGRAM

 

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES.

 

VANCOUVER, BC – June 12, 2019 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) ("Orla" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the voting results for the election of its Board of Directors, which took place at the Company’s Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders (“AGM”) held today. All nominees as set forth in the Company’s management proxy circular dated May 9, 2019 (“Circular”) were elected as directors of Orla at the AGM. Detailed results of the votes are set out below:

 

Nominee   Votes For     %     Withheld     %  
Charles Jeannes     129,138,157       99.73 %     354,650       0.27 %
Richard Hall     129,138,157       99.73 %     354,650       0.27 %
Jason Simpson     129,138,157       99.73 %     354,650       0.27 %
Jean Robitaille     129,484,157       99.99 %     8,650       0.01 %
George Albino     129,138,057       99.73 %     354,750       0.27 %
Tim Haldane     129,138,057       99.73 %     354,750       0.27 %
David Stephens     129,138,057       99.73 %     354,750       0.27 %
Elizabeth McGregor     129,484,157       99.99 %     8,650       0.01 %

  

The shareholders also approved: (1) the appointment of Davidson & Company LLP as auditors and authorized the Board of Directors to fix their remuneration; (2) amendments to the Company’s existing Stock Option Plan; (3) amendments to the Company’s Restricted Share Unit Plan; (4) amendments to the Company’s Deferred Share Unit Plan; (5) implementation of the Company’s Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program. Results of the shareholder votes on these items are set forth below:

  

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver BC   www.orlamining.com   1

 

 

 

 

 

    Outcome of
Vote
  Votes For     %    

Withheld/

Against

    %  
Appointment of Auditors   Carried     131,114,385       100.00 %     4,739       0.00 %
Re-approval of Option Plan   Carried     125,046,680       96.57 %     4,446,127       3.43 %
Re-approval of RSU Plan   Carried     125,011,680       96.54 %     4,481,127       3.46 %
Re-approval of DSU Plan   Carried     128,966,680       99.59 %     526,127       0.41 %
Approval of Early Warrant Exercise program   Carried     83,982,930 *     99.40 %     509,877       0.60 %

* Disinterested Shareholders votes. Excludes 45 million shares held by Shareholders holding warrants.

 

Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program to Commence June 13, 2019

 

As previously announced on May 14, 2019, the Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program (“Incentive Program”) for the 6,737,500 warrants outstanding having an exercise price of $0.62 and expiring on July 8, 2021 (the “2021 Warrants”) will begin on June 13, 2019. The Incentive Program is designed to encourage the early exercise of the unlisted 2021 Warrants during a 30-day early exercise period (the “Incentive Period”) ending on July 12, 2019.

 

Under the Incentive Program, holders of the 2021 Warrants (the “Warrantholders”) will be entitled to receive one full new warrant (the “Incentive Warrant”) upon the exercise of each 2021 Warrant during the Incentive Period. Each Incentive Warrant will be exercisable into one common share of Orla at a price of $1.65 for a period of 3 years, expiring on June 12, 2022.

 

Each Warrantholder of record will be receiving additional information regarding the Incentive Program in the coming days.

 

For further details regarding this program and the use of proceeds, please refer to the news release dated May 14, 2019 and the management information circular dated May 9, 2019.

 

The Incentive Warrants, the underlying securities issuable upon exercise of the Incentive Warrants, the 2021 Warrants and the underlying common shares issued upon exercise of the 2021 Warrants have not been, and will not be, registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "U.S. Securities Act") or any U.S. state securities laws, and may not be exercised, as applicable, or offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, United States persons absent registration or any applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable U.S. state securities laws.

 

This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in the United States, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver BC   www.orlamining.com   2

 

 

 

 

 

Orla has determined that while the Incentive Program may be a related party transaction pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Special Transactions (“MI 61-101”), Orla is not required to obtain a formal valuation under subsection 5.4(1) of MI 61-101 or minority approval under subsection 5.7(1)(a) of MI 61-101 because pursuant to the exemptions set forth in MI 61-101, neither the fair market value nor the fair market value of the consideration paid for the 2021 Warrants exceeds 25% of the Company’s market capitalization.

 

Advisor

 

GMP Securities L.P. is acting as financial advisor to Orla with respect to the Incentive Program.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 200,000 hectares. The Feasibility Study on the Camino Rojo Oxide Project is expected to be completed by mid-year 2019. The Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report for Camino Rojo dated March 11, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company's profile. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the "Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits" dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States federal and state securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the terms, timing and expected amount of proceeds the be received as part of the Incentive Program, the timing of completion of the Camino Rojo Oxide Project Feasibility Study and the timing of a construction decision. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts but which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

  

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver BC   www.orlamining.com   3

 

 

 

 

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson

Chief Executive Officer

 

Etienne Morin

Chief Financial Officer

 

Email: info@orlamining.com

Tel: 604-564-1852

  

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver BC   www.orlamining.com   4

 

 

Exhibit 99.71

 

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

 

WITH RESPECT TO THE

ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 12, 2019

 

Dated as of May 9, 2019

 

     

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

NOTICE is hereby given that the annual and special meeting (the “Meeting”) of the holders of common shares (“Shareholders”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”) will be held at 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, on the 12th day of June, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. (Vancouver time) for the following purposes:

 

(a) to receive the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation as at and for the financial year ended December 31, 2018, together with the report of the auditor thereon;

 

(b) to elect directors of the Corporation for the ensuing year;

 

(c) to appoint Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, as auditor of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorize the board of directors to fix the remuneration of the auditor;

 

(d) to consider, and if deemed advisable, to pass an ordinary resolution to approve certain amendments to the Corporation’s stock option plan, as more particularly described in the accompanying management information circular;

 

(e) to consider, and if deemed advisable, to pass an ordinary resolution to approve certain amendments to the Corporation’s restricted share unit plan, as more particularly described in the accompanying management information circular;

 

(f) to consider, and if deemed advisable, to pass an ordinary resolution to approve certain amendments to the Corporation’s deferred share unit plan, as more particularly described in the accompanying management information circular;

 

(g) to consider and if deemed advisable, approve with or without variation, a resolution approving the implementation of the Corporation’s early warrant exercise program, as described in the accompanying information circular; and
     
(h) to transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

The specific details of the foregoing matters to be put before the Meeting, as well as further information with respect to voting by proxy, are set forth in the management information circular which accompanies, and is deemed to form a part of, this Notice of Meeting.

 

Registered shareholders who are unable to attend the Meeting in person are requested to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed form of proxy either in the addressed envelope enclosed to Computershare Investor Services Inc., Attn: Proxy Department, 8th Floor, 100 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2Y1, or via fax to 1-866-249-7775 (toll free North America) or 1-416-263-9524 (International). Alternatively, registered shareholders may vote by telephone by calling 1-866-732-8683 (toll free) or by using the internet at www.investorvote.com. In each case, proxies must be received not later than 9:00 a.m. (Vancouver time) on June 10, 2019, or at least 48 hours (excluding Saturdays and holidays), before the time for holding the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

Non-registered shareholders who receive these materials through their broker or other intermediary are requested to follow the instructions for voting provided by their broker or intermediary, which may include the completion and delivery of a voting instruction form. If you are a non-registered shareholder and do not complete and return the materials in accordance with such instructions, you may not be entitled to vote at the Meeting, either in person or by proxy.

 

Please review the accompanying management information circular before voting as it contains important information about the Meeting. If you have any questions about the procedures required to qualify to vote at the Meeting or about obtaining and depositing the required form of proxy, you should contact Computershare Investor Services Inc. by telephone (toll free) at 1-800-564-6253, by fax at 1-866-249-7775 or by e-mail at service@computershare.com.

 

Dated May 9, 2019.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

  “Jason Simpson”
  JASON SIMPSON
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

     

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

General 1
   
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES AND VOTING INSTRUCTIONS 1
   
Solicitation of Proxies 1
   
Appointment and Revocation of Proxies 1
   
Voting of Proxies 2
   
Non-Registered Holders 2
   
Record Date 3
   
Voting Shares 4
   
Quorum 4
   
Principal Shareholders 4
   
Interest of Certain Persons or Companies in Matters to be Acted Upon 4
   
Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting 5
   
Financial Statements 5
   
Election of Directors 5
   
Appointment of Auditors 15
   
Amendments to 10% Rolling Stock Option Plan 15
   
Amendments to Restricted Share Unit Plan 18
   
Amendments to Deferred Share Unit Plan 19
   
Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program 21
   
Statement of Corporate Governance 24
   
Corporate Governance 24
   
Corporate Policies 31
   
Statement of Executive Compensation 35
   
Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis 35
   
Termination and Change of Control Benefits 47
   
Director Compensation 49
   
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under the Equity Compensation Plans 53
   
Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers 53
   
Interest of Informed Persons in Material Transactions 53
   
Other Business 54
   
Additional Information 54
   
Approval of Directors 54
   
Schedule “A” A-1
   
Schedule “B” B-1
   
Schedule “C” C-1
   
Schedule “D” D-1

 

     

 

 

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

 

General

 

This management information circular (the “Circular”) is furnished in connection with the solicitation by management (“Management”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation” or “Orla”) of proxies to be used at the Corporation’s annual and special meeting of the holders (“Shareholders”) of common shares of the Corporation (the “Common Shares”) to be held on June 12, 2019 (the “Meeting”) or at any adjournment or postponement thereof at the time and place and for the purposes set forth in the accompanying notice of annual and special meeting (“Notice of Meeting”).

 

Except as otherwise indicated, the information contained in this Circular is stated as at May 9, 2019. All dollar amounts referenced herein, unless otherwise indicated, are expressed in Canadian dollars.

 

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES AND VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

 

Solicitation of Proxies

 

It is anticipated that the solicitations will be made primarily by mail in relation to the delivery of the Circular. Proxies may also be solicited personally or by telephone by directors, officers or employees of the Corporation at nominal cost. The cost of the solicitation will be borne by the Corporation. The Corporation has arranged for Intermediaries (as defined below) to forward the meeting materials to Non-Registered Shareholders (as defined below) and the Corporation may reimburse the Intermediaries for their reasonable fees and disbursements in that regard.

 

Appointment and Revocation of Proxies

 

The person(s) designated by Management in the enclosed form of proxy are directors and/or officers of the Corporation (the “Management Proxyholders”). Each Shareholder has the right to appoint as proxyholder a person (who need not be a Shareholder) other than Management Proxyholders to attend and act on the Shareholder’s behalf at the Meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Such right may be exercised by striking out the names of the person(s) printed in the accompanying form of proxy and inserting the name of the person in the blank space provided in the enclosed form of proxy or by completing another suitable form of proxy and, in either case, delivering the completed and executed form of proxy as provided below.

 

Registered Shareholders

 

In the case of registered Shareholders (“Registered Shareholders”), the completed, signed and dated form of proxy should be sent in the addressed envelope enclosed to Computershare Investor Services Inc., Attn: Proxy Department, 100 University Avenue, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Yl, or via fax to 1-866-249-7775 (toll free North America) or 1-416-263-9524 (International). Alternatively, Registered Shareholders may vote by telephone by calling 1-866-732-8683 (toll free) or by using the internet at www.investorvote.com. To be effective, a proxy must be received not later than 9:00 a.m. (Vancouver time) on June 10, 2019, or at least 48 hours (excluding Saturdays and holidays), before the time for holding the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

A Registered Shareholder who has given a proxy may revoke it by depositing an instrument in writing, including another proxy bearing a later date, signed by the Shareholder or by the Shareholder’s attorney, who is authorized in writing, or by transmitting, by telephonic or electronic means, a revocation signed by electronic signature by the Shareholder or by the Shareholder’s attorney, who is authorized in writing, to the head office of the Corporation at any time up to and including the last business day preceding the day of the Meeting, or in the case of any adjournment or postponement of the Meeting, the last business day preceding the day of the adjournment or postponement, or with the Chair of the Meeting on the day of, and prior to the start of, the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. A Registered Shareholder may also revoke a proxy in any other manner permitted by law. Only Registered Shareholders have the right to revoke a proxy. A Non-Registered Shareholder who wishes to change its vote must arrange for its Intermediary to revoke its proxy on its behalf.

 

1 

 

 

Voting of Proxies

 

On any ballot that may be called for, the Common Shares represented by a properly executed proxy given in favour of the Management Proxyholders will be voted or withheld from voting in accordance with the instructions given on the ballot. If the Shareholder specifies a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, the Common Shares will be voted accordingly.

 

In the absence of any direction in the instrument of proxy, such Common Shares will be voted in favour of the matters set forth in the accompanying Notice of Meeting. The enclosed form of proxy confers discretionary authority upon the persons named therein with respect to amendments or variations to matters identified in the accompanying Notice of Meeting, and with respect to other matters which may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. At the date of this Circular, Management is not aware of any such amendment, variation or other matter to come before the Meeting. However, if any amendments or variations to matters identified in the accompanying Notice of Meeting or any other matters which are not now known to Management should properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the Common Shares represented by properly executed proxies given in favour of the Management Proxyholders will be voted on such matters pursuant to such discretionary authority.

 

Non-Registered Holders

 

Only Registered Shareholders or duly appointed proxyholders are permitted to vote at the Meeting. However, in many cases, Shareholders are “non-registered” Shareholders because the Common Shares they own are not registered in their names, but are instead registered in the name of the brokerage firm, bank or trust company through which they purchased the Common Shares. More particularly, a person is not a Registered Shareholder in respect of Common Shares which are held on behalf of that person (a “Non-Registered Shareholder”), but which are registered either: (a) in the name of an intermediary (an “Intermediary”) that the Non-Registered Shareholder deals with in respect of the Common Shares (Intermediaries include, among others, banks, trust companies, securities dealers or brokers and trustees or administrators of self-administered RRSPs, RRIFs, RESPs and similar plans); or (b) in the name of a clearing agency (such as The Canadian Depository for Securities Limited) of which the Intermediary is a participant. Non-Registered Shareholders do not appear on the list of Shareholders maintained by the transfer agent.

 

Non-Registered Shareholders who have not objected to their Intermediary disclosing certain ownership information about themselves to the Corporation are referred to as Non-Objecting Beneficial Owners (“NOBOs”). Those Non-Registered Shareholders who have objected to their Intermediary disclosing ownership information about themselves to the Corporation are referred to as Objecting Beneficial Owners (“OBOs”).

 

In accordance with the requirements as set out in National Instrument 54-101 – Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer, the Corporation has distributed copies of the Notice of Meeting, this Circular and the form proxy (collectively, the “Meeting Materials”) to Intermediaries for onward distribution to NOBOs and OBOs. The Corporation does not intend to pay for Intermediaries to deliver the Meeting Materials to OBOs. An OBO will therefore not receive the Meeting Materials unless such OBO’s Intermediary assumes the cost of delivery.

 

  2  

 

 

Intermediaries are required to forward the Meeting Materials to Non-Registered Shareholders unless a Non-Registered Shareholder has waived the right to receive them. Very often, Intermediaries will use service companies to forward the Meeting Materials to Non-Registered Shareholders. Generally, Non-Registered Shareholders who have not waived the right to receive the Meeting Materials will either:

 

(a) be given a form of proxy which has already been signed by the Intermediary (typically by a facsimile, stamped signature), which is restricted as to the number of Common Shares beneficially owned by the Non-Registered Shareholder but which is otherwise not completed. Because the Intermediary has already signed the form of proxy, this form of proxy is not required to be signed by the Non-Registered Shareholder when submitting the proxy. If the Non-Registered Shareholder does not wish to attend and vote at the Meeting in person (or have another person attend and vote on the holder’s behalf), the Non-Registered Shareholder must complete the form of proxy and deposit it with the Corporation’s registrar and transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services Inc., as provided above. If a Non-Registered Shareholder wishes to attend and vote at the Meeting in person (or have another person attend and vote on the holder’s behalf), the Non-Registered Shareholder must strike out the names of the persons named in the form of proxy and insert the Non-Registered Shareholder’s (or such other person’s) name in the blank space provided; or

 

(b) be given a voting instruction form which is not signed by the Intermediary, and which, when properly completed and signed by the Non-Registered Shareholder and returned to the Intermediary or its service company, will constitute voting instructions (often called a “proxy authorization form”) which the Intermediary must follow. Typically, the proxy authorization form will consist of a one page pre-printed form. Sometimes, instead of the one page pre-printed form, the proxy authorization form will consist of a regular printed proxy form accompanied by a page of instructions, which contains a removable label containing a barcode and other information. In order for the form of proxy to validly constitute a proxy authorization form, the Non-Registered Shareholder must remove the label from the instructions and affix it to the form of proxy, properly complete and sign the form of proxy and return it to the Intermediary or its service company in accordance with the instructions of the Intermediary or its service company. If the Non-Registered Shareholder does not wish to attend and vote at the Meeting in person (or have another person attend and vote on the holder’s behalf), the voting instruction form must be completed, signed and returned in accordance with the directions on the form. If Non-Registered Shareholder wishes to attend and vote at the Meeting in person (or have another person attend and vote on the Holder’s behalf), the Non-Registered Shareholder must complete, sign and return the voting instruction form in accordance with the directions provided and a form of proxy giving the right to attend and vote will be forwarded to the Non-Registered Shareholder.

 

In either case, the purpose of this procedure is to permit a Non-Registered Shareholder to direct the voting of the Common Shares which they beneficially own. Should a Non-Registered Shareholder who receives one of the above forms wish to vote at the Meeting in person, the Non-Registered Shareholder should strike out the names of the Management Proxyholders named in the form and insert the Non-Registered Shareholder’s name in the blank space provided. In either case, Non-Registered Shareholders should carefully follow the instructions of their Intermediary, including those regarding when and where the proxy or proxy authorization form is to be delivered.

 

Only Registered Shareholders have the right to revoke a proxy. A Non-Registered Shareholder who wishes to change its vote must arrange for its Intermediary to revoke its proxy on its behalf.

 

Record Date

 

The board of directors of the Corporation (the “Board”) has fixed April 25, 2019 (the “Record Date”) as the record date for the purpose of determining holders of Common Shares entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Meeting. In accordance with the provisions of the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “CBCA”), the Corporation or its transfer agent will prepare a list of holders of Common Shares on the Record Date. Each Shareholder named in the list or such Shareholder’s proxy will be entitled to vote the Common Shares shown opposite such Shareholder’s name on the list at the Meeting.

 

  3  

 

 

Voting Shares

 

The authorized voting securities of the Corporation consist of an unlimited number of Common Shares. As at Record Date, the Corporation had 179,493,510 Common Shares outstanding, each carrying the right to one vote. Except as otherwise noted in this Circular, a simple majority of the votes cast at the Meeting, whether in person, by proxy or otherwise, will constitute approval of any matter submitted to a vote.

 

Quorum

 

A quorum will be present at the Meeting if there are at least two persons present in person, each being a Shareholder entitled to vote thereat or a duly appointed proxy or proxyholder for an absent Shareholder so entitled, holding or representing in the aggregate not less than 25% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.

 

Principal Shareholders

 

To the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the Corporation, as at the Record Date, no person beneficially owned, controlled or directed, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the voting rights attached to the outstanding Common Shares except the following:

 

Shareholder   Number of
Common Shares
    % of
Outstanding
Common Shares
 
Goldcorp Inc.     34,410,141 (1)     19.2 %
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited     17,613,835 (2)     9.8 %
Pierre Lassonde     20,073,500 (3)     11.2 %

 

Notes:

(1) Goldcorp Inc. (“Goldcorp”), which was acquired by Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (“Newmont”) on April 18, 2019, also holds warrants to purchase 1,275,000 Common Shares, which upon exercise and together with its Common Shares represents approximately 19.7% of the Common Shares on a partially-diluted basis.
(2) Agnico Eagle Mines Limited also holds warrants to purchase 870,250 Common Shares, which upon exercise and together with its Common Shares represents approximately 10.2% of the Common Shares on a partially-diluted basis.
(3) Mr. Lassonde also holds warrants to purchase 3,940,000 Common Shares, which upon exercise and together with his Common Shares represents approximately 13.1% of the Common Shares on a partially-diluted basis.

 

Interest of Certain Persons or Companies in Matters to be Acted Upon

 

Other than as disclosed in this Circular, no: (i) director or executive officer of the Corporation at any time since the beginning of the last completed financial year; (ii) proposed nominee for election as a director; or (iii) any associate of a person in (i) or (ii) has any material interest, direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, in any matter to be acted upon at the Meeting. Directors and executive officers may, however, be interested in (a) the approval of the amendments to the Stock Option Plan (as defined below), the RSU Plan (as defined below) and the DSU Plan (as defined below) as detailed in “Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Amendments to 10% Rolling Stock Option Plan”, “Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Amendments to Restricted Share Unit Plan” and “Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Amendments to Deferred Share Unit Plan,” respectively, as such persons are entitled to participate in the Stock Option Plan, RSU Plan and DSU Plan; and (b) the approval of the Warrant Incentive Program (as defined below) as detailed in “Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Early Warrant Exercise Program”, as such persons may hold Warrants (as defined below). Any directors or executive officers of the Corporation who hold Warrants will, in respect of their Common Shares, not be permitted to vote on the Warrant Incentive Program since Disinterested Shareholder (as defined below) approval is being sought at the Meeting.

 

 

  4  

 

 

Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting

 

Financial Statements

 

The audited consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended December 31, 2018 and the report of the auditor thereon will be placed before the shareholders at the Meeting, but no vote thereon is required. These documents are available upon request or they can be found under the Corporation’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or on its website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Election of Directors

 

The Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles”) provide that the Board consist of a minimum of three and a maximum of ten directors. The Board currently consists of eight directors and the term of office of each of the present directors expires at the close of the Meeting. The Board has fixed the size of the Board for election at the Meeting at eight directors. At the Meeting, the eight persons set out below will be proposed for election as directors of the Corporation (the “Nominees”). Each of the Nominees is currently a director with the exception of Ms. Elizabeth McGregor, who is standing for election for the first time at the Meeting. Each director elected will hold office until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders or until such person’s successor is elected or appointed. Management does not contemplate that any of the Nominees will be unable to serve as a director, but if that should occur for any reason prior to the Meeting, it is intended that discretionary authority will be exercised by the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote the proxy for the election of any other person or persons in place of any Nominee or Nominees unable to serve. All Nominees have established their eligibility and willingness to serve as directors.

 

The Board recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the election of each of the Nominees. Unless authority is withheld, the Management Proxyholders intend to vote FOR the election of each of the Nominees.

 

The Corporation has adopted a Majority Voting Policy prepared in accordance with Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) majority voting requirements with respect to the annual election of directors. Pursuant to the Majority Voting Policy, each director must be individually elected by a majority (50%+1) of the votes cast with respect to his/her election, other than at contested meetings. If the votes in favour of the election of a Director at a Shareholder meeting represent less than a majority (i.e. 50% + 1) of the votes cast with respect to his or her election, that Director will immediately tender his or her resignation (“Resignation”) to the Board after the Shareholder meeting. Within ninety days following the applicable meeting, the Board shall conclude its deliberations and make a determination as to whether or not to accept the resignation, however, as mandated in the TSX guidelines, the Board shall accept the resignation absent exceptional circumstances. Following the Board’s determination, the Board will publicly disclose their decision, including, if applicable, the reasons for not accepting the resignation. A director who tenders a resignation pursuant to the Majority Voting Policy shall not be permitted to participate in any meetings of the Board or any sub-committee of the Board at which his/her election as a director is being considered.

 

The following tables set forth information with respect to each Nominee and is based upon information furnished by the respective proposed Nominee. Except as indicated below, each of the proposed Nominees has held the principal occupation shown beside the Nominee’s name in the table below or another executive office with the same or a related company, for the last five years.

 

  5  

 

 

 

 

CHARLES JEANNES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nevada, USA

Age, 60

Director since June 19, 2017

Independent

Principal Occupation
 
Corporate Director

 

Board and Board Committees   Meeting Attendance (1)  
Board of Directors (Chair)     100 %
Compensation Committee     100 %
Audit Committee     100 %
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at May 9, 2019
 
Common Shares   Options   Warrants   DSUs   Ownership
Requirement
2,031,100(2)   891,979   300,000   130,755   Satisfied
                 

 

Other Board Memberships
 
Pan American Silver Corp. (Director)
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (Director)

 

 

 

Mr. Jeannes joined the Board in June 2017. Mr. Jeannes served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Goldcorp from 2009 until April 2016, and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development from 2006 until 2008.  From 1999 until the acquisition of Glamis Gold Ltd. (“Glamis”) by Goldcorp, he was Executive Vice President, Administration, General Counsel and Secretary of Glamis. Prior to joining Glamis, Mr. Jeannes worked for Placer Dome Inc., most recently as Vice President of Placer Dome North America. From January 2017 to February 2019, Mr. Jeannes served as Director of Tahoe Resources Inc.  Following the acquisition of Tahoe Resources Inc. by Pan American Silver Corp., Mr. Jeannes was appointed as a Director of Pan American Silver Corp.  He is also a Director of Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (formerly Silver Wheaton Corp.) and serves as a University of Nevada, Reno (“UNR”) Foundation Trustee (a non-profit Board). He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from UNR and graduated from the University of Arizona School of Law with honours in 1983. He practiced law from 1983 until 1994 and has broad experience in capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, public and private financing and international operations.

 

 

Historical Voting Results
 
Year   For     Withheld  
2018     95.12 %     4.88 %
2017     99.96 %     0.04 %
2016     N/A       N/A  

 

 

 

Notes: 

(1) Meeting attendance during 2018.
(2) In addition, Mr. Jeannes is entitled to 500,000 Bonus Shares (as defined herein). The Bonus Shares will become issuable on the date Mr. Jeannes ceases to act as a director following June 18, 2020. See “Statement of Executive Compensation – Director Compensation”.

 

  6  

 

 

 

RICHARD HALL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colorado, USA

Age, 69

Director since June 10, 2015

Independent

Principal Occupation
 
Corporate Director, Geologist and Mineral Industry Consultant

 

Board and Board Committees   Meeting Attendance (1)  
Board of Directors     100 %
Compensation Committee (Chair)     100 %
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee     100 %
   

 

Securities Holdings as at May 9, 2019
 
Common Shares   Options   Warrants   DSUs   Ownership
Requirement
2,157,000   652,837   100,000   79,528   Satisfied
                 

 

Other Board Memberships
 
IAMGold Corporation (Director)

 

 

 

Mr. Hall joined the Board in June 2015. Mr. Hall was appointed a director of IAMGOLD in 2012.  Mr. Hall brings over 40 years of exploration, development, mining and corporate experience to the Corporation. Mr. Hall is a former Director of Kaminak Gold Corporation. Mr. Hall served as Chairman of Klondex Mines Ltd. from September 2014 until July 2018 when it was acquired by Hecla Mining Company.  From 1999 to 2008 he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Metallica Resources Inc., where he was involved in all aspects of the Corporation’s development including the financing, construction and commissioning of the Cerro San Pedro gold-silver mine in Mexico. While at Metallica, the El Morro deposit was discovered in Chile and was brought through to a final feasibility study in conjunction with Metallica’s operating partner on the project, Xstrata Copper. In August 2008, Metallica was part of a $1.6 billion merger with Peak Gold Ltd. and New Gold Inc. to form what is now New Gold Inc. Mr. Hall also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Northgate Minerals from July 2011 until October 2011 when Northgate was acquired by AuRico Gold Inc. From 2008 until 2011 he held the position of Chairman of Grayd Resource Corporation, which was acquired by Agnico Eagle in November 2011. Mr. Hall holds a Bachelor and a Masters Degree in Geology and an MBA from Eastern Washington University. He has also completed an Executive Development Program at the University of Minnesota.

 

 

Historical Voting Results
 
Year   For     Withheld  
2018     95.12 %     4.88 %
2017     99.96 %     0.04 %
2016     100  %    

0.00

%

 

 

 

Note: 

(1) Meeting attendance during 2018.
   

  7  

 

 

 

JASON SIMPSON

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ontario, Canada

Age, 45

Director since November 12, 2018

Not independent

Principal Occupation
 
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Corporation

 

Board and Board Committees   Meeting Attendance (1)  
Board of Directors     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at May 9, 2019
 
Common Shares   Options   RSUs   Ownership
Requirement
Nil   1,573,258 (2)   382,075   N/A
             

 

Other Board Memberships
 
None

 

 

 

Mr. Simpson was appointed the Corporation’s President and Chief Executive Officer effective November 12, 2018.  In addition to the role of President and CEO, Mr. Simpson also serves as a Director of the Corporation.  Mr. Simpson is a mining executive with over 21 years of experience in operations leadership, mining engineering and project construction. Most recently, he was Chief Operating Officer of Torex Gold Resources (“Torex”) where, over his nearly 6-year tenure, he oversaw the successful construction and operation of the ELG Mine in Mexico. Prior to Torex, Mr. Simpson spent 11 years at Vale in various roles of increasing responsibility ending his tenure as General Manager of the Labrador Operations (Voisey's Bay) in 2013. Mr. Simpson also worked at McIntosh Redpath Engineering on mining studies for companies including Barrick, Freeport McMoran, CVRD, Rio Tinto and Falconbridge, among others, where he gained global multi-commodity experience and perspective. Mr. Simpson holds dual degrees in Mining Engineering from the Technical University of Nova Scotia and in Physics from Dalhousie University.

 

 

Historical Voting Results
 
Year   For     Withheld  
2018     N/A       N/A
2017     N/A     N/A
2016     N/A       N/A  

 

 

 

Notes: 

(1) Meeting attendance during 2018 subsequent to his appointment.
(2) In addition, Mr. Simpson is entitled to 1,000,000 CEO Bonus Shares (as defined herein). See “Statement of Executive Compensation – Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis”.

 

  8  

 

 

 

JEAN ROBITAILLE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ontario, Canada

Age, 57

Director since December 6, 2016

Independent

 

 

Principal Occupation
 
Senior Vice-President of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited since June 2008.

 

Board and Board Committees   Meeting Attendance (1)  
Board of Directors     100 %
Compensation Committee     100 %
Environmental, Health and Safety Committee     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at May 9, 2019
 
Common Shares   Options   Warrants   DSUs   Ownership
Requirement
1,777,450   512,490   88,000   65,377   Satisfied
                 

 

Other Board Memberships
 
Canada Mining Innovation Council

 

 

 

Mr. Robitaille joined the Board in December 2016, upon closing of the Corporation’s acquisition of Pershimco Resources Inc. Mr. Robitaille is the Senior Vice-President, Business Strategy and Technical Services of Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., a position he has held since February 2014. Prior to that, he held various positions with Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. since 1988, most recently as Senior Vice-President, Technical Services and Project Development, Vice-President, Metallurgy & Marketing, General Manager, Metallurgy & Marketing and Mill Superintendent and Project Manager for the expansion of the LaRonde mill. Prior to joining Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., Mr. Robitaille worked as a metallurgist with Teck Mining Group. Since June of 2016, Mr. Robitaille has been Board Chairman of the Canada Mining Innovation Council (CMIC), and an active member of its Board of Directors since May of 2014. Mr. Robitaille is a mining graduate of the College de l’Abitibi Temiscamingue with a specialty in mineral processing.

 

 

Historical Voting Results
 
Year   For     Withheld  
2018     95.12 %     4.88 %
2017     99.96 %     0.04 %
2016     N/A       N/A  

 

 

 

Note: 

(1) Meeting attendance during 2018.

 

  9  

 

 

 

GEORGE ALBINO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colorado, USA

Age, 60

Director since June 19, 2017

Independent

 

 

Principal Occupation
 
Corporate Director

 

Board and Board Committees   Meeting Attendance (1)  
Board of Directors     80 %
Audit Committee     100 %
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (Chair)     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at May 9, 2019
 
Common Shares   Options   Warrants   DSUs   Ownership
Requirement

301,000

  461,913   121,500   72,453   Satisfied

 

Other Board Memberships
 
Eldorado Gold Corporation (Chairman)

 

 

 

Dr. Albino joined the Board in June 2017. Dr. Albino, Ph.D., was a Managing Director and Mining Analyst at GMP Securities, L.P., Research Division from 2010 until 2016. Prior to this, he was an Analyst at Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd., Research Division from June 2002 until 2010, focusing on North American precious metal producers and exploration companies as well as base metal, uranium and diamond companies. Dr. Albino has over 35 years of experience in mining and finance, having been a geologist for 18 years and as a highly-ranked sell side analyst covering mining (principally gold) stocks for 19 years. Before joining the financial services side of the business, he worked for 18 years in the mining industry, academia and government as an Exploration and Research Geologist exploring for precious metals, base 17 metals and diamonds. He is also currently the Chairman of the board of directors of Eldorado Gold Corporation (since October 2016). Dr. Albino has a Ph.D. from The University of Western Ontario, an M.S. from the Colorado State University and a B.A.Sc. from Queen’s University.

 

 

Historical Voting Results
 
Year   For     Withheld  
2018     99.96 %     0.04 %
2017     99.94 %     0.06 %
2016     N/A       N/A  

 

 

 

Note: 

(1) Meeting attendance during 2018.

 

  10  

 

 

 

TIM HALDANE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arizona, USA

Age, 62

Director since June 19, 2017

Independent

 

 

Principal Occupation
 
Mining professional/Corporate Director

 

Board and Board Committees   Meeting Attendance (1)  
Board of Directors     100 %
Environmental, Health and Safety Committee (Chair)     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at May 9, 2019
 
Common Shares   Options   Warrants   DSUs   Ownership
Requirement
103,500   461,913   14,250   72,453   Satisfied
                 

 

Other Board Memberships
 
None

 

 

 

Mr. Haldane joined the Board in June 2017. Mr. Haldane is a mining professional with 40 years of operating and project development experience including 15 years in Mexico. Mr. Haldane most recently held the position of Senior Vice President of Operations - USA & Latin America at Agnico Eagle Mines Limited from 2014 until February 2017. Mr. Haldane holds a B.S. in Metallurgical Engineering from Montana Tech and is a Registered Professional Engineer.

 

 

Historical Voting Results
 
Year   For     Withheld  
2018     99.98 %     0.02 %
2017     99.89 %     0.11 %
2016     N/A       N/A  

 

 

 

Note: 

(1) Meeting attendance during 2018.

 

  11  

 

 

 

DAVID STEPHENS (1)

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alberta, Canada

Age, 37

Director since March 29, 2018

Independent

 

 

Principal Occupation
 
Corporate Director/Corporate Development Consultant
Former Vice President, Corporate Development and Marketing of Goldcorp

 

Board and Board Committees   Meeting Attendance (2)  
Board of Directors     100 %
Audit Committee (Chair)     100 %

 

Securities Holdings as at May 9, 2019
 
Common Shares   Options   Warrants   Ownership
Requirement
Nil   Nil   Nil   N/A
             

 

Other Board Memberships
 
None

 

 

 

Mr. Stephens joined the Board in March 2018. Mr. Stephens most recently held the position of Vice President, Corporate Development & Marketing at Goldcorp from 2017 until Newmont acquired Goldcorp in April 2019.  Mr. Stephens previously served as Vice President & Treasurer at Goldcorp. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Mr. Stephens spent 10 years working in investment banking and equity research at various organizations including Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd. and Orion Securities. Mr. Stephens holds a Bachelors degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Harvard University.

 

 

Historical Voting Results
 
Year   For     Withheld  
2018     96.81 %     3.19 %
2017     N/A       N/A  
2016     N/A       N/A  

 

 

 

Notes:

(1) Mr. Stephens is the director nominee of Newmont following its acquisition of Goldcorp. See “Investor Rights Agreement” below.
(2) Meeting attendance during 2018 subsequent to appointment.

 

12

 

 

ELIZABETH McGREGOR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vancouver, British Columbia

Age, 42

First time nominee

Independent

 

Principal Occupation 
 
Finance professional, Corporate Director

 

Board and Board Committees   Meeting Attendance  
Board of Directors     N/A  
         
         

 

Securities Holdings as at May 9, 2019
 
Common Shares   Options   Warrants   Ownership
Requirement
Nil   Nil   Nil   N/A

 

Other Board Memberships
 
None

 

 

Ms. McGregor served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tahoe Resources Inc. from August 9, 2016 until the acquisition by Pan American Silver Corp. on February 22, 2019. Ms. McGregor is a Canadian Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CA) and, prior to her role as Chief Financial Officer, served as Tahoe Resources Inc.’s VP Treasurer. She directed financial planning, corporate liquidity, financial reporting and risk management. Prior to joining Tahoe Resources Inc., she worked at Goldcorp from 2007 to 2013 where she held various financial roles including Director of Project Finance and Cost Control; Administration Manager at the Peñasquito mine; and Director of Risk. Ms. McGregor began her career at KPMG as Audit Manager. She holds a B.A. (Hons) from Queen’s University in Kingston.

 

Historical Voting Results
 
Year   For   Withheld
2018   N/A   N/A
2017   N/A   N/A
2016   N/A   N/A

 

 

 

Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanction

 

Other than as set out below, no director or proposed director of the Corporation is, as at the date of this Circular, or has been, within the 10 years preceding the date of this Circular, a director, chief executive officer and chief financial officer of any company (including the Corporation) that:

 

(a) while that person was acting in that capacity, was the subject of a cease trade, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, in each case that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days (each, an “Order”);

 

(b) was subject to an Order that was issued after the proposed director ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in the capacity as a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer; or

 

13

 

 

 

(c) while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets.

 

No director or proposed director of the Corporation has, within the 10 years before the date of this Circular, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of such director or proposed director.

 

To the knowledge of the Corporation, as of the date hereof, no proposed director has been subject to: (a) any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority; or (b) any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable security holder in deciding whether to vote for a proposed director.

 

In August 2014, Sonoma Resources Inc. (“Sonoma”), a reporting issuer in British Columbia and Alberta, was subject to a cease trade order imposed by the British Columbia Securities Commission (the “BCSC”) because Sonoma failed to file a comparative financial statement for the financial year ended March 31, 2014. Mr. Smit was a director of Sonoma at the time. Sonoma subsequently filed its financial statements for the periods ended March 31, 2014, June 30, September 30, 2014, and December 31, 2014, along with the related management’s discussion and analysis and certifications. In 2015, BCSC issued Revocation Orders allowing Sonoma to effect certain transactions to complete a reverse take-over with Element Lifestyle Retirement Inc.

 

Investor Rights Agreement

 

In accordance with the terms of the investor rights agreement dated November 7, 2017 between Goldcorp and Orla (the “Investor Rights Agreement”), Goldcorp has, among other rights, the right to nominate an individual for election to the Board. In the event the number of directors on the Board is increased to more than ten directors, Goldcorp shall be entitled to designate an additional nominee, provided that at the time of such increase in the size of the Board it holds at least 10% of the Common Shares. Goldcorp was acquired by Newmont on April 18, 2019 pursuant to a plan of arrangement and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation. Mr. David Stephens, the former Vice President, Corporate Development and Marketing of Goldcorp has served as Goldcorp’s nominee since March 29, 2018. At the Meeting, Mr. Stephens is the nominee of Newmont following its acquisition of Goldcorp.

 

Under the terms of the Investor Rights Agreement, Goldcorp has agreed to vote its Common Shares in accordance with the recommendations of the Board or Management on all matters to be submitted to Shareholders, including for the Management nominee’s for directors, except in the case of voting in respect of: (i) any issuer bid, insider bid, related party transaction or business combination; (ii) any amendment to the constating documents of the Corporation, other immaterial or administrative changes; (iii) any matter in relation to which a recognized proxy advisor is recommending against Management or the Board on any resolution for Shareholders; (iv) any disposition of assets for consideration equal or greater than 50% of the market capitalization immediately prior to the entering into of such transaction; (v) any proposed distribution of securities where the number of Common Shares issued or issuable thereunder is greater than 25% of the Common Shares which are outstanding prior to closing; and (vi) in any circumstances where the Corporation or its directors or officers are not in compliance with the agreement or applicable laws, in which case Goldcorp is entitled to vote its Common Shares in its discretion. Any nominee of Goldcorp on the Board will not be required to vote in accordance with the recommendations but will exercise his or her fiduciary responsibilities as a director by voting as he or she sees fit.

 

14

 

 

Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, Goldcorp has agreed that it will not sell or otherwise dispose of its Common Shares for a period of 24 months from the date of the agreement, subject to certain exceptions. In addition, it has been granted certain participation rights to maintain its pro rata interest in future offerings.

 

Similarly, the Corporation has entered into an investor rights agreement with Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. providing it with certain participation rights to maintain its pro rata interest in future offerings.

 

Appointment of Auditors

 

The Board proposes to re-appoint Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants (“Davidson & Company”), as the auditor of Orla to hold office until the close of the next annual general meeting of shareholders of the Corporation. The resolution to approve the re-appointment of Davidson & Company will also authorize the Board to fix its remuneration. Davidson & Company was first appointed as the auditor of the Corporation on December 28, 2016. Additional information with respect to the Corporation’s auditor can be found in Orla’s annual information form dated March 28, 2019 (the “AIF”) available under the Corporation’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

To be effective, the resolution to re-appoint Davidson & Company must be approved by not less than a majority of the votes cast by the holders of Common Shares present in person, or represented by proxy, at the Meeting.

 

The Board recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the re-appointment of Davidson & Company. Unless authority is withheld, the Management Proxyholders intend to vote FOR the appointment of Davidson & Company as the auditor of the Corporation to hold office until the next annual general meeting of Shareholders or until a successor is appointed and the Board is authorized to fix their remuneration.

 

Amendments to 10% Rolling Stock Option Plan

 

The Corporation’s existing 10% rolling stock option plan (the “Stock Option Plan”) was implemented to provide effective incentives to senior officers, directors, employees (including management company employees), consultants or investor relations persons of the Corporation or its subsidiaries (the “Eligible Persons”) and to enable the Corporation to attract, retain and motivate experienced and qualified individuals in those positions by providing such individuals with the opportunity to acquire, through Common Share options, an increased proprietary interest in the Corporation. As at May 9, 2019, there are 11,102,665 options outstanding under the Stock Option Plan, representing 6.2% of the outstanding Common Shares and 5,328,481 options remain available for grant (after taking into account the outstanding RSUs and DSUs), representing 3.0% of the outstanding Common Shares.

 

The total number of options which may be granted to any one person under the Stock Option Plan within any 12 month period shall not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares. In addition, the maximum number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance under options granted to insiders (as a group) under the Stock Option Plan, together with any other of the Corporation’s previously established and outstanding stock option plans or grants, shall be 10% of the Common Shares. Accordingly, a maximum of 5,328,481 options remain available for grant to insiders (representing 3.0% of the outstanding Common Shares).

 

15

 

The following table sets out the burn rate of stock options for the three most recently completed financial years:

 

Year   Stock Options Granted     Weighted Average Securities
Outstanding
    Burn Rate(1)  
2018     3,841,505       176,748,000       2.2 %
2017     4,365,000       131,550,000       3.3 %
2016     1,068,744       30,900,000       3.5 %

 

Notes:

(1) The “burn rate” is defined as the number of stock options granted in a fiscal year divided by the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding in that year. The weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding is the number of Common Shares outstanding at the beginning of the period, adjusted by the number of Common Shares bought back or issued during the period multiplied by a time-weighting factor. Time-weighting factor is the number of days that the Common Shares are outstanding as a proportion of the total number of days in the period.

 

The Stock Option Plan was last approved by Shareholders at the annual and special meeting of the Corporation held on June 27, 2018. For a description of the material terms of the Stock Option Plan as it exists on the date hereof, see Schedule “A”.

 

In connection with its graduation to the TSX on November 1, 2018, the Corporation provided an undertaking to the TSX to make certain amendments to the Stock Option Plan. Accordingly, at the Meeting, Shareholders will be asked to consider and, if deemed appropriate, to pass, with or without variation, a resolution in the form set out below (the “Option Plan Resolution”), subject to such amendments, variation or additions as may be approved at the Meeting, approving certain amendments to the Stock Option Plan. A blacklined copy of the proposed amendments to the Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan Amendments”) are attached to this Circular as Exhibit “A” to Schedule “A”.

 

The more substantive amendments being proposed are as follows:

 

1. revising the definition of change of control in order to align with the RSU Plan and the DSU Plan, and revising the change of control provision, to provide for a double-trigger, such that stock options will only become immediately vested if (a) there is a change of control; plus (b) a termination of employment without cause or for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement);

 

2. revising the definitions of “insider” to align with the rules set forth in the TSX Company Manual;

 

3. removing the limitations and restrictions relating to consultants and investor relations persons that were only applicable to TSX Venture Exchange issuers;

 

4. revising the limits under the Stock Option Plan to clarify that the 10% limit applies to all security-based compensation arrangements of the Corporation, other than the 500,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”;

 

5. revising the insider participation limits to align with the policies set forth in the TSX Company Manual;

 

6. revising to include a maximum value that may be granted to each non-employee director under the Stock Option Plan, together with all security-based compensation arrangements of the Corporation, of $150,000 in any fiscal year, of which no more than $100,000 may be in the form of stock options; and

 

16

 

 

7. adding a comprehensive provision that provides that the Board may only make the following amendments with the requisite regulatory and shareholder approval: amendments to (i) increase the number of Common Shares which may be issued pursuant to the Stock Option Plan; (ii) reduce the exercise price, or cancel and reissue stock options; (iii) extend the term of a stock option beyond the original expiry; (iv) the definition of “Eligible Persons” under the Stock Option Plan that may permit the introduction or reintroduction of non-employee directors on a discretionary basis or amendments that increase limits previously imposed on non-employee director participation; (v) that would permit stock options, or any other right or interest of an optionee under the Stock Option Plan, to be assigned or transferred, other than for normal estate settlement purposes; (vi) amendments to the amendment provisions of the Stock Option Plan; or (vii) the participation limits of the Stock Option Plan;

 

8. adding a provision that provides that, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory approval (where required), but not subject to shareholder approval, the Board may make all other amendments to the Stock Option Plan or options under the Stock Option Plan that are not of the type contemplated in Item 7, including, without limitation: (i) amendments of a housekeeping nature; (ii) amendments to the exercise procedures or vesting provisions of a stock option or the Stock Option Plan; (iii) amendments to the definitions, other than such definitions noted in Item 7 above; (iv) to the take-over bid provisions or the change of control provisions (provided any such amendments shall not allow optionees to be treated any more favourably than other holders of Common Shares with respect to the consideration that the optionees would be entitled to receive for their Common Shares in the event of a take-over bid or upon a change of control); (v) amendments to reflect changes to applicable securities laws; and (vi) amendments to ensure that the stock options granted will comply with any provisions respecting income tax and other laws; and

 

9. certain housekeeping amendments.

 

The Board has approved the Option Plan Amendments, subject to shareholder and stock exchange approvals.

 

The Board and management recommend the adoption of the resolution approving the Option Plan Amendments. To be effective, the Option Plan Resolution must be approved by not less than a majority of the votes cast by Shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting.

 

The text of the Option Plan Resolution to be submitted to shareholders at the Meeting is set forth below:

 

“NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

 

1. the stock option plan (the “Stock Option Plan”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”), as amended by the board of directors (the “Board”) and substantially in the form presented to the shareholders (the “Shareholders”) of the Corporation (the “Amended Stock Option Plan”) is hereby approved;

 

2. the Board be authorized on behalf of the Corporation to make any further amendments to the Amended Stock Option Plan as may be required by regulatory authorities, without further approval of the Shareholders, in order to ensure adoption of the Amended Stock Option Plan;

 

3. the approval of the Amended Stock Option Plan by the Board is hereby ratified and confirmed and any one director or officer of the Corporation is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Corporation to execute all documents and to do all such other acts and things as such director or officer may determine to be necessary or advisable to give effect to the foregoing provisions of this resolution.”

 

The Board recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the Option Plan Resolution to approve Option Plan Amendments. Unless authority is withheld, the Management Proxyholders intend to vote FOR the Option Plan Amendments.

 

17

 

 

Amendments to Restricted Share Unit Plan

 

The Corporation’s existing restricted share unit plan (the “RSU Plan”) was implemented to provide for a wide range of incentive plans to attract, retain and encourage eligible employees, directors and consultants of the Corporation due to the opportunity offered to them to acquire a proprietary interest in the Corporation and to secure for the Corporation and Shareholders the benefits inherent in the ownership of Common Shares by such persons. The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares available for issuance under the RSU Plan shall not exceed 3,000,000 Common Shares (being 1.7% of the outstanding Common Shares). As at May 9, 2019, there are 1,097,639 restricted share units (“RSUs”) outstanding under the RSU Plan, representing 0.6% of the outstanding Common Shares, and 1,902,361 RSUs remain available for grant, representing 1.1% of the outstanding Common Shares.

 

The maximum number of RSUs available for grant to any one person, in a 12 month period, pursuant to the RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation, is 5% of the total number of Common Shares. In addition, the maximum number of Common Shares reserved for issuance under RSUs granted to insiders (as a group), at any time, pursuant to the RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. Accordingly, a maximum of 1,902,361 RSUs remain available for grant to insiders (representing 1% of the outstanding Common Shares). The following table sets out the burn rate of RSUs since adoption of the RSU Plan:

 

Year   RSUs Granted     Weighted Average Securities
Outstanding
    Burn Rate  
2018     368,000       176,748,000       0.2 %
2017     N/A       N/A       N/A  
2016     N/A       N/A       N/A  

 

The RSU Plan was last approved by Shareholders at the annual and special meeting of the Corporation held on June 27, 2018. For a description of the material terms of the RSU Plan, see Schedule “B”.

 

In connection with its graduation to the TSX on November 1, 2018, the Corporation provided an undertaking to the TSX to make certain amendments to the RSU Plan. Accordingly, at the Meeting, Shareholders will be asked to consider and, if deemed appropriate, to pass, with or without variation, a resolution in the form set out below (the “RSU Plan Resolution”), subject to such amendments, variation or additions as may be approved at the Meeting, approving certain amendments to the RSU Plan as set out below. A blacklined copy of the proposed amendments to the RSU Plan (the “RSU Plan Amendments”) are attached to this Circular as Exhibit “A” to Schedule “B”.

 

The more substantive amendments being proposed are as follows:

 

1. revising the definition of “insider” to align with the rules set forth in the TSX Company Manual;

 

2. removing the limitations and restrictions relating to consultants and investor relations persons that were only applicable to TSX Venture Exchange issuers;

 

3. revising the limits under the RSU Plan to clarify there is a 10% limit on the Common Shares issuable that applies to the RSU Plan together with all security-based compensation arrangements of the Corporation, other than the 500,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”;

 

4. revising the insider participation limits to align with the policies set forth in the TSX Company Manual; and

 

18

 

 

5. revising the change of control provision, to provide for a double-trigger, such that RSUs will only become immediately vested if (a) there is a change of control; plus (b) a termination of employment for cause or for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement).

 

The Board has approved the RSU Plan Amendments, subject to shareholder and stock exchange approvals.

 

The Board and management recommend the adoption of the resolution approving the RSU Plan Amendments. To be effective, the RSU Plan Resolution must be approved by not less than a majority of the votes cast by Shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting.

 

The text of the RSU Plan Resolution to be submitted to shareholders at the Meeting is set forth below:

 

“NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

 

1. the restricted share unit plan (the “RSU Plan”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”), as amended by the board of directors (the “Board”) and substantially in the form presented to the shareholders (the “Shareholders”) of the Corporation (the “Amended RSU Plan”) is hereby approved;

 

2. the Board be authorized on behalf of the Corporation to make any further amendments to the Amended RSU Plan as may be required by regulatory authorities, without further approval of the Shareholders, in order to ensure adoption of the Amended RSU Plan;

 

3. the approval of the Amended RSU Plan by the Board is hereby ratified and confirmed and any one director or officer of the Corporation is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Corporation to execute all documents and to do all such other acts and things as such director or officer may determine to be necessary or advisable to give effect to the foregoing provisions of this resolution.”

 

The Board recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the RSU Plan Resolution to approve the RSU Plan Amendments. Unless authority is withheld, the Management Proxyholders intend to vote FOR the RSU Plan Resolution.

 

Amendments to Deferred Share Unit Plan

 

The Corporation’s existing deferred share unit plan (the “DSU Plan”) which, among other things, provides for the award of Deferred Share Units (“DSUs”) to directors who, at the relevant time, are not otherwise employees or consultants of the Corporation or of any of its affiliates, as further described below. The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares that may be issued under the DSU Plan shall not exceed 2,000,000 Common Shares (representing 1.1% of the outstanding Common Shares). As at May 9, 2019, there are 420,566 DSUs outstanding under the DSU Plan, representing 0.2% of the outstanding Common Shares, and 1,579,434 DSUs remain available for grant, representing 0.9% of the outstanding Common Shares.

 

The maximum number of Common Shares issuable to any one person, in a 12 month period, pursuant to the DSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation, is 5% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of Common Shares reserved for issuance under DSUs granted to insiders (as a group), at any time, pursuant to the DSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. Accordingly, a maximum of 1,579,434 DSUs remain available for grant to insiders (representing 0.9% of the outstanding Common Shares).

 

19

 

 

The following table sets out the burn rate of DSUs since adoption of the DSU Plan:

 

Year   DSUs Granted     Weighted Average Securities
Outstanding
    Burn Rate  
2018     180,000       176,748,000       0.1 %
2017     N/A       N/A       N/A  
2016     N/A       N/A       N/A  

 

The DSU Plan was last approved by Shareholders at the annual and special meeting of the Corporation held on June 27, 2018. For a description of the material terms of the DSU Plan, see Schedule “C”.

 

In connection with its graduation to the TSX on November 1, 2018, the Corporation provided an undertaking to the TSX to make certain amendments to the DSU Plan. Accordingly, at the Meeting, Shareholders will be asked to consider and, if deemed appropriate, to pass, with or without variation, a resolution in the form set out below (the “DSU Plan Resolution”), subject to such amendments, variation or additions as may be approved at the Meeting, approving certain amendments to the DSU Plan as set out below. A blacklined copy of the proposed amendments to the DSU Plan (the “DSU Plan Amendments”) are attached to this Circular as Exhibit “A” to Schedule “C”.

 

The more substantive amendments being proposed are as follows:

 

1. revising the definition of “insider” to align with the rules set forth in the TSX Company Manual;

 

2. revising the limits under the DSU Plan to clarify there is a 10% limit on the Common Shares issuable that applies to the DSU Plan together with all security-based compensation arrangements of the Corporation, other than the 500,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chairperson as “bonus shares” and the 1,000,000 Common Shares issuable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer as “bonus shares”; and

 

3. revising the insider participation limits to align with the policies set forth in the TSX Company Manual.

 

The Board has approved the DSU Plan Amendments, subject to shareholder and stock exchange approvals.

 

The Board and management recommend the adoption of the resolution approving the DSU Plan Amendments. To be effective, the DSU Plan Resolution must be approved by not less than a majority of the votes cast by Shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting.

 

The text of the DSU Plan Resolution to be submitted to shareholders at the Meeting is set forth below:

 

“NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

 

1. the deferred share unit plan (the “DSU Plan”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”), as amended by the board of directors (the “Board”) and substantially in the form presented to the shareholders (the “Shareholders”) of the Corporation (the “Amended DSU Plan”) is hereby approved;

 

2. the Board be authorized on behalf of the Corporation to make any further amendments to the Amended DSU Plan as may be required by regulatory authorities, without further approval of the Shareholders, in order to ensure adoption of the Amended DSU Plan;

 

3. the approval of the Amended DSU Plan by the Board is hereby ratified and confirmed and any one director or officer of the Corporation is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Corporation to execute all documents and to do all such other acts and things as such director or officer may determine to be necessary or advisable to give effect to the foregoing provisions of this resolution.”

 

20

 

 

The Board recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the DSU Plan Resolution to approve DSU Plan Amendments. Unless authority is withheld, the Management Proxyholders intend to vote FOR the DSU Plan Resolution.

 

Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program

 

Unless the context otherwise suggests, references to “Warrants” refer to the Common Share purchase warrants of the Corporation dated July 8, 2016, each of which entitles the holder thereof to acquire one Common Share (an “Underlying Share”) at a price of $0.62 per Underlying Share (the “Exercise Price”) at any time prior to 5:00 p.m. (Vancouver time) on July 8, 2021; and any holder of such a Warrant is referred to as a “Warrantholder”. The Warrants were issued in connection with the private placement of 14,000,000 units (“Units”) of the Corporation, on July 8, 2016. Each Unit consisted of one Common Share and one-half of one Warrant.

 

Background and Reasons for the Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program

 

The Corporation proposes to provide an incentive to the early exercise of the Warrants by offering Warrantholders the distribution of one Common Share purchase warrant (the “Incentive Warrants”) to the Warrantholders in consideration of the early exercise of outstanding Warrants (the “Warrant Incentive Program”). 6,737,500 Warrants remain outstanding as of May 9, 2019. The Underlying Shares represented by the Warrants represents approximately 3.8% of the Corporation’s 179,493,510 issued and outstanding common shares as of the Record Date, April 25, 2019.

 

Under the Warrant Incentive Program, it is proposed that the Corporation will issue Incentive Warrants to holders who exercise Warrants during the early exercise period commencing on June 13, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. ET and terminating on July 12, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. ET (the “Incentive Period”). “Disinterested Shareholder” approval is required and refers to shareholder approval that excludes votes by shareholders holding Warrants. Final approval of the TSX is also required. The Warrants are not listed on the TSX, and the Incentive Warrants will not be listed on the TSX.

 

The Corporation notes that in order for U.S. Warrantholders to exercise their Warrants, U.S. Warrantholders will be required to qualify for an applicable exemption from registration under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

Each Warrantholder who chooses to exercise Warrants will exercise the Warrants in accordance with the exercise form forming part of the certificate for the Warrants. A beneficial Warrantholder of Warrants must give instructions for exercise to the broker through whom the Warrants are held. Any Warrants that are not exercised prior to the expiry of the Incentive Period will remain outstanding and continue to be exercisable for Common Shares of the Corporation on their current terms and will not receive Incentive Warrants.

 

The Corporation has engaged GMP Securities L.P. (“GMP”) to provide services in connection with the Warrant Incentive Program, including financial advice and analysis, as well as solicitation of the Warrantholders to participate in the Warrant Incentive Program.

 

The Corporation believes that the Warrant Incentive Program contemplated would have the following benefits to the Corporation, its shareholders and the Warrantholders:

 

1. the Warrant Incentive Program provides Warrantholders with the opportunity to monetize the “in-the-money” portion of the unlisted Warrants while providing the Warrantholders with an incentive premium (i.e. the Incentive Warrants) to compensate for the foregone optionality of the current Warrants;

 

21

 

 

2. the early exercise of the Warrants would provide cash proceeds to the Corporation, reduce the overhang of a large block of in-the-money share purchase warrants, and increase the Corporation’s financial strength and flexibility;

 

3. the Company expects to receive $4.2 million in cash assuming all warrantholders elect to participate to the Early Warrant Exercise Program. The Company intends to use the proceeds from this program to advance the feasibility study on the Camino Rojo Oxide Project to completion, continue regional exploration works around the Camino Rojo deposit and to allow flexibility in the timing of ordering certain long-lead items once a construction decision has been determined.

 

4. the estimated expenses of the Warrant Incentive Program and the aggregate value of the Warrant Incentive Program provide a cost-effective source of financing for the Corporation; and

 

5. management believes that the dilutive effect of the Warrants has been factored into investors’ valuation of the securities of the Corporation, yet the Corporation currently lacks the benefits of the cash generated by the exercise of the Warrants.

 

Models for Warrant Incentive Program

 

Under a Black-Scholes option valuation method, the value of a Warrant is comprised of its intrinsic value (difference between current share price and exercise price, i.e. the value that Warrantholders can realize today) and time value optionality (represented by the option value of the Warrant until its expiry – if a Warrantholder exercises early, the Warrantholder foregoes this time value option).

 

One Incentive Warrant will be issued for each Warrant exercised during the Incentive Period, will have an exercise price of $1.65 and will expire on June 12, 2022. Accordingly, if all Warrants are exercised during the Incentive Period, an aggregate of 6,737,500 Incentive Warrants will be issued, representing approximately 3.6% of the Corporation’s issued and outstanding common shares as of May 9, 2019, assuming the exercise of all the existing Warrants.

 

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

 

The Board recommends that Disinterested Shareholders vote in favour of the Warrant Incentive Program.

 

The material factors considered by the directors of the Corporation in recommending the Warrant Incentive Program are:

 

1. the Warrant Incentive Program provides Warrantholders with the opportunity to monetize the “in-the-money” portion of the unlisted Warrants while providing the Warrantholders with an incentive premium (ie. the Incentive Warrants) to compensate for the foregone optionality of the current Warrants; if all or a significant number of the Warrants are exercised during the Incentive Period, the proceeds from such early exercise would provide a cost-effective source of funds for the Corporation;

 

2. pursuant to the requirements of the TSX, the Warrant Incentive Program must be approved at a special meeting of shareholders by a majority of the votes cast thereat by Disinterested Shareholders; and

 

3. each Warrant that remains unexercised after the Incentive Period will continue to entitle the holder thereof to acquire one Common Share at the Exercise Price until July 8, 2021;

 

4. the dilutive effect of the “in-the-money” Warrants has been factored into investors’ valuation of the securities of the Corporation; and

 

5. the exercise price of the Incentive Warrants would be at a premium to the current market price of the Common Shares and potentially provide for a future source of capital at an attractive price to the Corporation.

 

22

 

 

On May 9, 2019, the disinterested directors on the Board, being Messrs. Simpson, Robitaille, Stephens, and Haldane, approved the general terms of the Warrant Incentive Program and the submission of the Warrant Incentive Program to Disinterested Shareholders of the Corporation for their approval.

 

Certain directors of the Corporation hold an aggregate of 500,000 Warrants and Mr. Pierre Lassonde holds an aggregate of 1,440,000 Warrants. Accordingly, in the event all such directors and Mr. Lassonde exercise their Warrants, an aggregate of 1,940,000 Incentive Warrants will be issued to such persons (representing 1.1% of the outstanding Common Shares, assuming exercise of the 1,940,000 Warrants held by such directors and Mr. Lassonde).

 

Disinterested Shareholder Approval

 

Pursuant to Section 608 of the TSX Company Manual, the Warrant Incentive Program requires Disinterested Shareholder approval. Accordingly, the Warrant Incentive Program is required to be approved by a majority of the votes cast by Disinterested Shareholders at the Meeting or by a majority of the Disinterested Shareholders by way of written consent. TSX policy requires Disinterested Shareholder approval because it treats the Corporation’s proposed issuance of Incentive Warrants as an effective reduction of the exercise price of in-the-money warrants.

 

As of April 25, 2019, being the record date for voting at the Meeting, the Corporation estimates that Warrantholders also hold approximately 45,000,000 Common Shares, which will be excluded for the purposes of the Disinterested Shareholders’ vote, representing approximately 25% of the outstanding Common Shares. Given certain Warrantholders are beneficial Shareholders registered through CDS it is not possible to determine the exact number of Common Shares held by such persons.

 

The person(s) named in the enclosed form of proxy intend to vote at the Meeting for the approval of the resolution concerning the Warrant Incentive Program unless otherwise directed by the shareholder appointing them.

 

The Board and management recommend the adoption of the resolution approving the Warrant Incentive Program. To be effective, the resolution must be approved by not less than a majority of the votes cast by Disinterested Shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting.

 

The text of the resolution approving the Warrant Incentive Program to be submitted to Disinterested Shareholders at the Meeting is set forth below:

 

“NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

 

1. Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”) implement a warrant incentive program (the “Warrant Incentive Program”) by way of the issuance of common share purchase warrants of the Corporation with an exercise price of $1.65 and expiring June 12, 2022 as an incentive (the “Incentive Warrants”) for the early exercise of up to 6,737,500 common share purchase warrants (the “Warrants”) of the Corporation otherwise exercisable until July 8, 2021 at an exercise price of $0.62, during the early exercise period commencing on June 13, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. ET and terminating on July 12, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. ET, subject to receipt of any necessary regulatory approval including the approval of the TSX, as further described in the management information circular dated May 9, 2019 and delivered to the shareholders (the “Circular”);

 

2. the amendment of the Warrants to provide for the issuance of the Incentive Warrants during the period commencing on June 13, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. ET and terminating on July 12, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. ET or such other time period determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, is hereby authorized and approved;

 

3. upon exercise of the Incentive Warrants in accordance with their terms, including the payment of the respective exercise price thereof, the common shares of the Corporation underlying the Incentive Warrants shall be issued as fully paid and non-assessable common shares of the Corporation;

 

23

 

 

4. any officer or director of the Corporation is authorized and directed to execute and deliver in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation and under its corporate seal or otherwise all such certificates, instruments, agreements, notices and other documents and to do such other acts and things as, in the opinion of such person, may be necessary or desirable in connection with the Warrant Incentive Program, and the performance of the Corporation of its obligations in connection therewith, and to give effect to the foregoing and facilitate the implementation of the foregoing resolution; and

 

5. notwithstanding the passing of this resolution by the shareholders, the directors of the Corporation are authorized and empowered without further notice to or approval of the shareholders not to proceed with the Warrant Incentive Program, as described in the Circular or to revoke this resolution at any time prior to this resolution being effective.”

 

The directors have reviewed and considered all facts respecting the approval of the Warrant Incentive Program, and the Warrant Incentive Program was approved by the Corporation’s disinterested directors.

 

The Board unanimously recommend that Disinterested Shareholders vote in favour of approving the Warrant Incentive Program. Unless authority is withheld, the Management Proxyholders intend to vote FOR the resolution authorizing the approval of the Warrant Incentive Program.

 

The Corporation has determined that while the Warrant Incentive Program may be a related party transaction pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Special Transactions (“MI 61-101”), the Corporation is not required to obtain a formal valuation under subsection 5.4(1) of MI 61-101 for the Warrant Incentive Program because pursuant to the exemption set forth in 5.5(a) of MI 61-101, neither the fair market value of the Warrants nor the fair market value of the consideration paid for the Warrants exceeds 25% of the Corporation’s market capitalization. In addition, the exemption from the minority approval requirement provided for under subsection 5.7(1)(a) of MI 61-101 can be relied on as neither the fair market value of the Warrants nor the fair market value of the consideration paid for such Warrants exceeds 25% of the Corporation’s market capitalization.

 

Statement of Corporate Governance

 

Corporate Governance

 

The Corporation and the Board recognize the importance of corporate governance to the effective management of the Corporation and to the protection of its employees and Shareholders. The Corporation’s approach to significant issues of corporate governance is designed with a view to ensuring that the business and affairs of the Corporation are effectively managed so as to enhance Shareholder value.

 

In June 2005, National Policy 58-201 – Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) and National Instrument 58-101 – Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (the “Governance Disclosure Rule”) were adopted by the securities regulatory authorities in Canada. The Governance Guidelines deal with matters such as the constitution and independence of corporate boards, their functions, the effectiveness and education of Board members and other items dealing with sound corporate governance practices. The Governance Disclosure Rule requires that, if management of an issuer solicits proxies from its security holders for the purpose of electing directors, specified disclosure of its corporate governance practices must be included in its management information circular. As required by the Governance Disclosure Rule and other applicable regulatory instruments, the following disclosure describes the Corporation’s corporate governance policies and initiatives.

 

The Corporation continually reviews and monitors developments in Canada with a view to further revising its governance policies and practices, as appropriate. Subsequent to the completion of the acquisition of Pershimco Resources Inc. in December 2016 (the “Pershimco Acquisition”), the Camino Rojo gold project in November 2017 and the graduation to the TSX on November 1, 2018, the Corporation’s corporate governance practices and policies were reviewed in order to ensure the Corporation was well situated with best practices in light of its stage of development. This review culminated with the Board adopting various revised and new corporate governance documents and policies. The Board will continue to monitor such practices on an ongoing basis and when necessary implement such additional practices as it deems appropriate.

 

24

 

 

 

The Board of Directors

 

The Board discharges its responsibility for overseeing the management of the Corporation’s business by delegating to the Corporation’s senior officers the responsibility for day-to-day management of the Corporation. The Board discharges its responsibilities both directly and through its standing committees; namely, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Environmental, Health and Safety Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. In addition to these regular committees, the Board may appoint ad hoc committees periodically to address issues of a more short-term nature. The Board’s primary roles are overseeing corporate performance and providing quality, depth and continuity of management to meet Orla’s strategic objectives. A copy of the mandate of the Board is attached hereto as Schedule “D”.

 

The Board is responsible for, among other things:

 

· developing, reviewing and approving the business objectives and goals of the Corporation and reviewing the business, financial and strategic plans by which it is proposed that Orla may reach those goals;

 

· approving and monitoring compliance with all significant policies and procedures;

 

· providing input to Management on emerging trends and issues and on strategic plans, objectives and goals that Management develops and monitoring the Corporation’s progress toward its strategic and operational goals, and to revise its direction to Management in light of changing circumstances affecting the Corporation;

 

· reviewing and approving the annual consolidated audited financial statements, the interim consolidated financial statements, and the notes and management’s discussion and analysis accompanying such financial statements, as well as Orla’s management information circular and overseeing the accurate reporting of the financial performance of the Corporation to shareholders, other security holders and regulators on a timely and regular basis;

 

· ensuring the implementation of appropriate environmental stewardship and health and safety management systems, which are sufficient within the terms and practices of the mining industry, to ensure compliance with applicable laws; and

 

· identifying the principal risks of the Corporation’s business and ensuring the implementation of appropriate systems to effectively monitor and manage those risks with a view to the long-term viability of the Corporation and achieving a proper balance between the risks incurred and the potential return to Orla’s shareholders.

 

Meetings of the Board

 

The Board fulfills its mandate at regularly scheduled meetings or as required. The directors are kept informed of the Corporation’s operations at these meetings as well as through reports and discussions with Management throughout the year. The frequency of the meetings and the nature of the meeting agendas are dependent upon the nature of the business and affairs which the Corporation faces from time to time. The Board’s practice is that, at the end of each meeting of the Board, independent directors meet in the absence of Management and non-independent directors to hold an open and candid discussion. For the financial year ended December 31, 2018, all Board and committee meetings were accompanied by in-camera sessions where Management was not in attendance.

 

25

 

 

The majority of directors in office constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business and a quorum of directors may exercise all the powers of directors at a meeting. Directors are expected to attend all meetings of the Board and the committees upon which they serve, to come to such meetings fully prepared (including full review of all documentation sent prior to the meeting), and to remain in attendance for the duration of the meeting.

 

In certain circumstances, non-directors will be permitted to attend Board and committee meetings to provide information and opinions to assist the directors in their deliberations. The Board, through the Chair will determine non-director attendees for a meeting, and no non-directors will be permitted to table material at the Board meeting without the prior approval of the Chair (in the case of the Board) or committee chair (in the case of committee of the board).

 

Independence of the Board

 

The Governance Disclosure Rule defines an “independent” director as a director who has no direct or indirect material relationship with the Corporation. A “material relationship” is in turn defined as a relationship which could, in the view of the Board, be reasonably expected to interfere with such member’s independent judgment.

 

The Board is currently comprised of eight directors. The Board has determined that six out of the eight current members are “independent” directors within the meaning of the Governance Disclosure Rule. Messrs. Jason Simpson and Hans Smit are not considered “independent” as a result of their roles as executive officers. Messrs. Charles Jeannes, Richard Hall, Jean Robitaille, Tim Haldane, George Albino and David Stephens are each considered to be “independent” directors of the Corporation. During 2018, there were certain changes to the Board. Mr. Stephens replaced Mr. Steven Thomas’ as Goldcorp’s representative to the Board in March 2018. Mr. Thomas was considered “independent” while he served as a director. Mr. Marc Prefontaine was not considered “independent” up and until his resignation in November 2018 as a result of his role as an executive officer.

 

If the proposed Nominees put forth by Management are elected at the Meeting, the Board will be comprised of eight directors, seven of whom (Messrs. Jeannes, Hall, Robitaille, Haldane, Albino, Stephens and Ms. McGregor) will be considered “independent” directors and one of whom (Mr. Simpson) will not be considered “independent” for the reasons stated above. To enhance its ability to act independent of Management, the members of the Board may meet in the absence of members of Management and the non-independent directors or may excuse such persons from all or a portion of any meeting where a potential conflict of interest arises or where otherwise appropriate.

 

Chair of the Board

 

The current Chair of the Board is Mr. Charles Jeannes. Mr. Jeannes is considered independent. The Chair’s role and responsibilities include providing leadership to the Board, assisting the Board in satisfying its oversight responsibilities, managing Board meetings, promoting the delivery of information to the directors of the Corporation on a timely basis such that directors are fully apprised of all matters which are material to directors, presiding over Shareholder meetings and such other functions as may be ancillary to the duties and responsibilities and as may be delegated to the Chair by the Board from time to time. The Role Statement for Non-Executive Chair is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

The Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation is responsible for managing the business and affairs of the Corporation within the corporate policies and mandates and authority limitations established by the Board from time to time. The Role Statement for the Chief Executive Officer is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

26

 

 

Other Reporting Issuer Directorships

 

The following table sets forth the directors of the Corporation who currently hold directorships in other reporting issuers:

 

Name Name of Reporting Issuer Exchange Term
Richard Hall IAMGold Corporation TSX, NYSE 2012 to Present
Charles Jeannes Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. TSX, NYSE 2016 to Present
  Pan American Silver Corp. TSX, NASDAQ 2019 to Present
George Albino Eldorado Gold Corp. TSX, NYSE 2016 to Present

 

Orientation and Continuing Education

 

Given the size and stage of the Corporation, the Board as a whole is responsible for ensuring that new directors are provided with an orientation program, which includes written information about the business, documents from recent Board meetings and governance policies.

 

In addition, directors are encouraged to visit and meet with Management on a regular basis and are provided the opportunity to independently consult with legal counsel to the Corporation to understand their legal obligations as directors.

 

The Corporation also encourages continuing education of its directors and officers where appropriate in order to ensure that they have the necessary skills and knowledge to meet their respective obligations to the Corporation.

 

At each quarterly Board meeting, the Chief Financial Officer makes a presentation to the Board to provide a comprehensive overview of the Corporation’s financial performance, anticipated future financial results and market trends. In addition, together with legal counsel to the Corporation, the Chair of the Board continually reviews the latest securities rules and policies and best practices in corporate governance. Any changes or new requirements will then be brought to the attention of the Corporation’s directors. Board members are encouraged to communicate with Management, auditors, legal counsel and technical consultants; to keep themselves current with industry trends and developments and changes in legislation with Management’s assistance; and to attend related industry seminars and visit the Corporation’s projects. Board members have full access to the Corporation’s records.

 

Ethical Business Conduct

 

The Board expects Management to operate the business of the Corporation in a manner that enhances shareholder value and is consistent with the highest level of integrity. Management is expected to execute the Corporation’s business plan and to meet performance goals and objectives according to the highest ethical standards. To this end, the Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) for its directors, officers and employees.

 

Employees are required to report any violations under the Code or the Corporation’s corporate governance policies in accordance with the Corporation’s Whistleblower Policy, which provides that an individual may report any concerns or complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, audit-related matters or fraud to the Chair of the Audit Committee. Such concerns and/or complaints will be kept confidential and may be communicated anonymously if desired. Following the receipt of any complaints, the Chair of the Audit Committee shall promptly investigate each matter so reported.

 

27

 

 

A copy of the Code and the Whistleblower Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com and has also been filed on SEDAR and may be accessed under the Corporation’s profile at www.sedar.com.

 

The Board monitors compliance with the Code and Management provides an annual report to the Board regarding issues, if any, arising under the Code and the Corporation’s corporate governance policies.

 

In addition, as some of the directors of the Corporation also serve as directors and officers of other companies engaged in similar activities, the Board must comply with the conflict of interest provisions of the CBCA, as well as the relevant securities regulatory instruments, in order to ensure that directors exercise independent judgment in considering transactions and agreements in respect of which a director or officer has a material interest. Each director is required to declare the nature and extent of his interest and is not entitled to vote at meetings which involve such conflict.

 

Compensation Committee

 

The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of three independent directors, being Messrs. Hall (Chair), Robitaille and Jeannes. The Compensation Committee has adopted a written mandate and is responsible for the review and approval of the philosophy and design of the Corporation’s compensation programs and the compensation of the Corporation’s executives and members of the Board and for submitting recommendations to the Board in this regard. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board, as appropriate, in connection with the Corporation’s succession planning with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executive officers and ensuring that the structure, design and application of the Corporation’s material compensation programs meet the Corporation’s principles, objectives and risk profile and do not encourage excessive risk taking.

 

See “Statement of Executive Compensation – Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below for details regarding the Corporation’s objectives and philosophy regarding executive compensation and the application of this philosophy to the Corporation’s executive compensation arrangements.

 

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

 

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is currently comprised of three independent directors, being Messrs. Albino (Chair), Jeannes and Hall.

 

The Corporation’s Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee is in place to provide a focus on governance that will enhance the Corporation’s performance, to assess and make recommendations regarding the Board’s effectiveness and to establish and lead the process for identifying, recruiting, appointing, re-appointing, evaluating and providing ongoing development for directors. The full text of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s charter is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Audit Committee

 

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of three independent directors, being Messrs. Stephens (Chair), Jeannes and Albino, each of whom is considered to be (i) independent; and (ii) financially literate. The Audit Committee is responsible for the Corporation’s financial reporting process and the quality of its financial reporting.

 

The Audit Committee is charged with the mandate of providing independent review and oversight of the Corporation’s financial reporting process, the system of internal control and management of financial risks, and the audit process, including the selection, oversight and compensation of the Corporation’s external auditors. The Audit Committee also assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities in reviewing the Corporation’s process for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and its own code of business conduct. In performing its duties, the Audit Committee maintains effective working relationships with the Board, Management, and the external auditors and monitors the independence of those auditors. The full text of the Audit Committee’s charter is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

28

 

 

During the financial year ended December 31, 2018, the Audit Committee met 3 times.

 

The following table describes the education and experience of each current Audit Committee member that is relevant to the performance of his responsibilities as an Audit Committee member:

 

David Stephens: Mr. Stephens was the Vice President, Corporate Development & Marketing at Goldcorp until its acquisition by Newmont on April 18, 2019, having previously served as Vice President & Treasurer. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Mr. Stephens spent 10 years working in investment banking and equity research at various organizations including Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd. and Orion Securities. Mr. Stephens holds a Bachelors degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Harvard University.

 

Charles Jeannes: Mr. Jeannes served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Goldcorp from 2009 until April 2016, and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development from 2006 until 2008. From 1999 until the acquisition of Glamis by Goldcorp, he was Executive Vice President, Administration, General Counsel and Secretary of Glamis. Prior to joining Glamis, Mr. Jeannes worked for Placer Dome Inc., most recently as Vice President of Placer Dome North America. From January 2017 to February 2019, Mr. Jeannes served as Director of Tahoe Resources Inc. He is currently a Director of Pan American Silver Corp. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (formerly Silver Wheaton Corp.) and serves as a UNR Foundation Trustee (a non-profit Board). He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from UNR and graduated from the University of Arizona School of Law with honours in 1983. He practiced law from 1983 until 1994 and has broad experience in capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, public and private financing and international operations.

 

George Albino: Dr. Albino, Ph.D. was a Managing Director and Mining Analyst at GMP Securities, L.P., Research Division from 2010 until 2016. Prior to this, he was an Analyst at Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd., Research Division from June 2002 until 2010, focusing on North American precious metal producers and exploration companies as well as base metal, uranium and diamond companies. Dr. Albino has over 35 years of experience in mining and finance, having been a geologist for 18 years and as a highly-ranked sell side analyst covering mining (principally gold) stocks for 19 years. Before joining the financial services side of the business, he worked for 18 years in the mining industry, academia and government as an Exploration and Research Geologist exploring for precious metals, base metals and diamonds. He is also currently a Director of Eldorado Gold Corporation. Dr. Albino has a Ph.D. from The University of Western Ontario, an M.S. from the Colorado State University and a B.A.Sc. from Queen’s University.

 

29

 

 

The following table sets out the external auditor service fees paid in the 2018 and 2017 financial years:

 

    2018     2017  
Audit Fees(1)   $ 92,500     $ 92,500  
Audit-Related Fees(2)   $ 31,000       Nil  
Tax Fees(3)   $ 12,500     $ 20,939  
All Other Fees(4)     Nil       Nil  
Total:   $ 136,000     $ 113,439  

 

Notes:

(1) Fees billed by the Corporation’s auditor for audit services.

(2) Fees billed by the Corporation's external auditor for assurance-related services that are not included in “audit fees”. Such fees consist primarily of quarterly reviews and work related to providing consents pursuant to financings.

(3) Fees for professional services rendered by the Corporation’s external auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

(4) Fees for products and services provided by the Corporation’s external auditor, other than services reported under the table headings “Audit Fees”, “Audit-Related Fees” or “Tax Fees”.

 

As part of its duties, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all non-audit services performed by the independent auditors in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditors’ independence. In considering the appointment of the auditor for non-audit services, the Audit Committee will consider the compatibility of the service with the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee does not delegate to Management its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditors.

 

Environmental, Health and Safety Committee

 

The Environmental, Health and Safety Committee is currently comprised of three directors, being Messrs. Haldane (Chair) and Robitaille, each of whom is considered to be independent, and Mr. Smit, who is not considered to be independent. The purpose of the Environmental, Health and Safety Committee is to monitor and review the health, safety, environmental and sustainable development policies, principles, practices and processes of the Corporation and monitor and review the regulatory issues related to health, safety, the environment and sustainable development. The Environmental, Health and Safety Committee has the authority to engage independent counsel or other experts and conduct any investigation that it considers appropriate. It is responsible for amongst other things, reviewing and approving annual disclosure relating to the Corporation’s sustainability, health, safety and environment policies and activities, reviewing sustainability, environmental and health and safety reports and identifying the principal health, safety and environmental risks and impacts of the Corporation.

 

Assessment of Board Performance

 

Led by the independent Chair, the Board as a whole is expected to evaluate the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and individual directors on an annual basis. The Board has adopted a questionnaire that asks the directors to assess the effectiveness of the Board and its committees in respect of: structure and composition; roles and responsibilities; operations; effectiveness; committee meetings’ operations and effectiveness; and individual director performance. The Board evaluation process was designed to provide directors with an opportunity each year to examine how the Board is operating and to make suggestions for improvement. The Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for ensuring the questionnaire covers all necessary topics of discussion and for gathering the feedback from other directors or the Corporation.

 

30

 

 

Director Term Limits and Other Mechanisms of Board Renewal

 

The Corporation has not adopted term limits for the directors on the Board or other mechanisms of Board renewal at this time. Term limits are not considered necessary, as the Board believes it has adopted sufficient practices and mechanisms for renewal. In particular, the Board has appointed a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee comprised solely of independent directors to provide a focus on governance that will enhance the Corporation’s performance; to assess and make recommendations regarding the Board’s effectiveness; and to establish and lead the process for identifying, recruiting, appointing, re-appointing and providing ongoing development for directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will complete annual reviews of the Board’s relationship with Management to ensure the Board is able to, and in fact does, function independently of Management. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will also develop, and annually update and recommend to the Board for approval, a long term plan for Board composition that takes into consideration, among other matters, the current strengths, skills and experience represented by each director, as they affect Board dynamics as well as retirement dates. The Board believes that the perspective of longer service directors with industry experience is of benefit to the Board. In addition, Management believes that the experience and diversity of the current Board would be very difficult to replicate and that regular evaluation of Board skills and experience, rather than arbitrary term limits, will result in better Board performance.

 

Corporate Policies

 

Environmental & Sustainability, Health & Safety Policy

 

The Corporation is committed to meeting or surpassing regulatory requirements in all of its exploration and development activities while working to protect the environment both within and beyond the Corporation’s operational boundaries. In keeping with this commitment, Orla has adopted an Environmental, Sustainability and Health & Safety Policy. The Corporation will conduct all of its operations in a manner that ensures full compliance with its Environmental, Sustainability and Health & Safety Policy, applicable legislation and government requirements. The aim of this policy is to protect the surroundings in which the Corporation operates, to minimize and manage environmental risk and to enhance sustainable environmental practices. Orla will ensure that all of its activities are conducted in an environmentally safe and responsible manner and will ensure that its contractors adhere to the same high environmental standards. The full text of the Environment & Sustainability, Health & Safety Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Corporate Social Responsibility Policy

 

The Corporation is committed to conducting its business in a responsible manner at all times. In keeping with this commitment, Orla has implemented a Corporate Social Responsibility Policy which sets out the guidelines by which the Corporation will (i) endeavour to respect the health and safety of its employees, (ii) protect the environment, (iii) respect the human rights of its employees and the residents in the communities in which the Corporation operates and (iv) contribute to the sustainable development of those communities. The full text of the Corporate Social Responsibility Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Share Ownership Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted a Share Ownership Policy in order to align the interests of the officers and directors of the Corporation with those of the Corporation’s Shareholders by requiring such persons to own a significant number of Common Shares. Each of the non-executive directors is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least three times the value of the annual base retainer. Each of the executive officers is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least two times his or her base salary. The ownership guidelines will be deemed to be satisfied following the date on which the price paid by the director or officer for Common Shares or the fair market value of the Common Shares equals or exceeds the ownership threshold. Individuals are required to comply with this policy by the fifth anniversary of the date of the individual’s date of hire or appointment. The full text of the Share Ownership Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

31

 

 

Name   Number of
Common Shares
    Market Value of
Common Shares(1)
    Share Ownership
Requirement(2)
    Requirement
Met?
Officers
Jason Simpson
President and Chief Executive Officer
    Nil       Nil     $ 900,000     N/A(3)
Hans Smit
Chief Operating Officer
    2,942,900     $ 3,031,187     $ 500,000     Yes
Etienne Morin
Chief Financial Officer
    50,000     $ 51,500     $ 500,000     N/A(3)
Non-Executive Directors
George Albino
Director
    301,000     $ 310,030     $ 90,000     Yes
Charles Jeannes
Director
    2,031,100     $ 2,092,033     $ 150,000     Yes
Richard Hall
Director
    2,157,000     $ 2,221,710     $ 105,000     Yes
Tim Haldane
Director
    103,500     $ 106,605     $ 90,000     Yes
Jean Robitaille
Director
    1,777,450     $ 1,830,774     $ 75,000     Yes
David Stephens
Director
    Nil (4)     Nil       Nil (4)   N/A(4)

 

Notes:
(1) Calculated using $1.03, being the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on May 9, 2019.
(2) Each of the non-executive directors is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least three times the value of the annual base retainer. Each of the executive officers is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least two times his or her base salary.
(3) Mr. Simpson and Mr. Morin joined the Corporation in 2018, and accordingly have five years from their respective dates of hire to satisfy the requirement.
(4) Mr. Stephens was an employee of Goldcorp and accordingly, waived his annual base retainer in 2018 and was not subject to the share ownership requirements. Goldcorp holds 34,410,141 Common Shares and also holds warrants to purchase 1,275,000 Common Shares.

 

Majority Voting Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted a Majority Voting Policy prepared in accordance with TSX majority voting requirements with respect to the annual election of directors. The full text of the Majority Voting Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com. See “Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon – Election of Directors” for a summary of the Majority Voting Policy.

 

Corporate Disclosure Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted a Corporate Disclosure Policy to outline the required process for the timely disclosure of all material information relating to the Corporation’s business, including both written and verbal disclosure, and to provide guidance and assistance to the Board, officers and employees in complying with their obligations under the provisions of securities laws and stock exchange rules to preserve the confidentiality of the Corporation’s non-public material information. The full text of the Corporate Disclosure Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

32

 

 

Insider Trading Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted an Insider Trading Policy. Canadian securities laws and regulations prohibit “insider trading” and impose restrictions on trading securities while in possession of material undisclosed information. The rules and procedures detailed in the Corporation’s Insider Trading Policy have been implemented in order to prevent improper trading of the Corporation’s securities or of companies with which the Corporation may have a business relationship. The full text of the Insider Trading Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

For a summary of the Corporation’s Whistleblower Policy see “Corporate Governance – Ethical Business Conduct” above.

 

Clawback Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted a Clawback Policy in order to maintain a culture of focused, diligent and responsible management which discourages conduct detrimental to the growth of the Corporation and to ensure that incentive-based compensation paid by the Corporation is based upon accurate financial data. The Clawback Policy applies in the event of a material restatement of the Corporation’s financial results as a result of material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements. The full text of the Clawback Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Anti-Hedging Policy

 

The Corporation has adopted a formal Anti-Hedging Policy, the objective of which is to prohibit those subject to it from directly or indirectly engaging in hedging against future declines in the market value of any securities of the Corporation through the purchase of financial instruments designed to offset such risk. The Board believes that it is inappropriate for directors, officers or employees of the Corporation or its respective subsidiary entities or, to the extent practicable, any other person (or their associates) in a special relationship with the Corporation, to hedge or monetize transactions to lock in the value of holdings in the securities of the Corporation. Such transactions, while allowing the holder to own the Corporation’s securities without the full risks and rewards of ownership, potentially separate the holder’s interests from those of other stakeholders and, particularly in the case of equity securities, from the public shareholders of the Corporation. The full text of the Anti-Hedging Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Diversity Policy

 

The Corporation is committed to creating and maintaining a culture of workplace diversity. In keeping with this commitment, the Corporation has established a Diversity Policy. “Diversity” is any dimension which can be used to differentiate groups and people from one another and it means the respect for and appreciation of the differences in gender, age, ethnic origin, religion, education, sexual orientation, political belief or disability, amongst other things. The Corporation recognizes the benefits arising from employee and Board diversity, including a broader pool of high quality employees, improving employee retention, accessing different perspectives and ideas and benefiting from all available talent. The Corporation respects and values the perspectives, experiences, cultures and differences that employees possess. The full text of the Diversity Policy is available on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

33

 

 

Policies Regarding the Representation of Women on the Board

 

As noted above, the Corporation has established a Diversity Policy, which sets out guidelines by which the Corporation will endeavour to promote, foster and support diversity, such as gender diversity, throughout the Company, including at the Board level, and applies to executive and non-executive directors, full-time, part-time and casual employees, contractors, consultants and advisors of Orla. Along with the adoption of the Diversity Policy, the Board also adopted guidelines by which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is to consider the diversity of the Board in its recommendations to the Board of nominees for election to the Board and long term plan for Board composition. The Board will proactively monitor Company performance in meeting the standards outlined in the Diversity Policy. This will include an annual review of any diversity initiatives established by Management and the Board, and progress in achieving them. All directors and senior executive officers are required to acknowledge that they have read the Diversity Policy annually.

 

Consideration of the Representation of Women in the Director Identification and Selection Process

 

Pursuant to the Diversity Policy, the Board will consider diversity, such as gender diversity, in the selection criteria of new Board members. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will follow its charter and consider the diversity of the Board in its recommendations to the Board of nominees for election to the Board and long term plan for Board composition. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will also consider the following with respect to recommending nominees for election to the Board:

 

· competencies and skills each nominee will bring to the Board;

 

· past business experience;

 

· integrity;

 

· industry knowledge;

 

· ability to contribute to the success of the Corporation;

 

· past experience of directors or Management with potential candidates;

 

· expected contribution to achieving an overall Board which can function as a high performance team with sound judgment and proven leadership;

 

· whether the nominee can devote sufficient time and resources to his or her duties as a Board member; and

 

· any other factors as may be considered appropriate.

 

Consideration Given to the Representation of Women in Executive Officer Appointments

 

Pursuant to the Diversity Policy, the Board will consider diversity, such as gender diversity, in the selection criteria of new senior executive officer appointments. Management is responsible for recruiting and fostering a diverse and inclusive culture. Management will promote a work environment that values and utilizes the contributions of women and men equally, with a variety of backgrounds, experiences and perspectives through awareness of the benefits of workforce diversity and successful management of diversity.

 

Targets and Number of Women on the Board and in Executive Officer Positions

 

The Corporation has not established targets regarding the representation of women on the Board or executive officer positions. The Company believes that specific targets would be arbitrary and continues to favour recruitment and promotion based on abilities and contributions in accordance with the Diversity Policy.

 

There are currently no women on the Board or in executive officer positions at the Corporation. Ms. McGregor has been proposed for election as director at the Meeting. Should Ms. McGregor and all other directors proposed for election at the Meeting be elected, there would be one woman on the Board (13%).

 

34

 

 

 

Statement of Executive Compensation

 

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

In accordance with the requirements of applicable securities legislation in Canada, the following executive compensation disclosure is provided in respect of each person who served as the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer during the financial year ended December 31, 2018 and each of the three other most highly compensated executive officers of the Corporation for the financial year ended December 31, 2018, whose annual aggregate compensation exceeded $150,000 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

 

The Named Executive Officers for the financial year ended December 31, 2018 were:

 

· Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer;
   
· Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer;
   
· Hans Smit, Chief Operating Officer;
   
· Marc Prefontaine, Former President and Chief Executive Officer; and
   
· Paul Robertson, Former Chief Financial Officer.

 

During the financial year ended December 31, 2018, there were no other executive officers or individuals acting in a similar capacity for the Corporation whose compensation was, individually, more than $150,000.

 

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Circular sets out the Corporation’s objectives and philosophy regarding executive compensation and the application of this philosophy to the Corporation’s executive compensation arrangements. It also provides an analysis of the Corporation’s compensation design, and the decisions the Compensation Committee made in the financial year ended December 31, 2018, with respect to the Named Executive Officers.

 

Compensation Governance

 

When determining the compensation arrangements for the Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee considers the following objectives:

 

· retaining an executive critical to the success of the Corporation and the enhancement of Shareholder value;

 

· providing fair and competitive compensation;

 

· balancing the interests of Management and Shareholders;

 

· rewarding performance, both on an individual basis and with respect to the business in general; and

 

· ensuring recognition of the fact that the Corporation carries on business with a small number of executive officers relative to other public companies of similar size.

 

For the financial year ended December 31, 2018, the Board and the Compensation Committee considered many factors when considering, reviewing and making recommendations for compensation arrangements for the Named Executive Officers. In determining the compensation level for each executive, the Compensation Committee looked at a variety of factors such as certain corporate and individual objectives, the relative complexity of the executive’s role within the organization, the executive’s performance and potential for future advancement, as well as the compensation paid by a group of comparable companies, as further discussed under “Benchmarking” below.

 

35

 

 

The Compensation Committee

 

The Compensation Committee is comprised of three independent directors, being Messrs. Hall (Chair), Jeannes and Robitaille. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Compensation Committee held committee meetings on an as needed basis. The primary goal of these meetings as they related to compensation matters was to ensure that the compensation provided to the Named Executive Officers was determined with regard to the Corporation’s business strategies and objectives, such that the financial interest of the executive officers were aligned with the financial interest of Shareholders, and to ensure that their compensation was fair and reasonable and sufficient to attract and retain qualified and experienced executives. The Compensation Committee has adopted a written mandate that governs its practices. See “Role of the Compensation Committee and the Board” below and “Statement of Corporate Governance – Corporate Governance – Compensation Committee”.

 

The Board looks to the past experience of each director in determining the composition of the Compensation Committee and strives to include a range of skills and experiences when making appointments to ensure the Compensation Committee is comprised of directors that act independently and think analytically about the Corporation’s compensation practices. As a whole, each of the members of the Compensation Committee have direct experience and skills relevant to their responsibilities in executive compensation, including with respect to enabling such directors in making informed decisions on the suitability of the Corporation’s compensation policies and practices. Each of these directors have experience on the board of directors and related committees of other public companies, as described under “Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Meeting – Election of Directors.”

 

Recommendations of Management

 

For the financial year ended December 31, 2018, the Compensation Committee consulted with the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Operating Officer regarding the Corporation’s annual business goals, objectives and achievements. In addition, the Compensation Committee consulted with the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Operating Officer regarding executive officer target short-term incentive awards and actual payouts, and long-term incentive grants, which the Compensation Committee then considered and recommended to the Board, as appropriate. Neither the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer nor the Chief Operating Officer made any recommendations with respect to his own compensation package, which was determined by the Compensation Committee directly for recommendation to the Board.

 

The Compensation Committee can exercise its discretion in modifying any of the consultations with or recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer prior to making its recommendations to the Board.

 

Role of the Compensation Committee and the Board

 

The Compensation Committee assists the Board in monitoring the Corporation’s guidelines and practices with respect to compensation and benefits and ensures that the Corporation’s compensation program is competitive and fair. With respect to compensation, the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

 

· reviewing and submitting to the Board recommendations concerning executive compensation and compensation plan matters;

 

· providing periodic reports to the Board on compensation matters that review and assess the design and competitiveness of the Corporation’s compensation and benefits programs generally, while considering the implications of any risks associated with the Corporation’s compensation policies and practices; and

 

· reviewing and making recommendations, in consultation with the Chair of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer, to the Board with respect to implementing or varying share option, share purchase, compensation and other incentive plans.

 

36

 

 

In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews and recommends compensation policies and processes, and any new incentive compensation and equity compensation plans or changes to such plans. The Board makes final decisions on overall executive compensation after receiving advice and recommendations from the Compensation Committee.

 

For the financial year ended December 31, 2018, the Compensation Committee considered consultations with the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Operating Officer, and considered and made recommendations to the Board all executive compensation matters for 2018. The Board considered and granted final approval for executive compensation decisions, with decisions regarding the Chief Executive Officer being made by the non-executive directors of the Board (being all Board members other than the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer).

 

Independent Compensation Consultant

 

In the financial years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, neither the Board nor the Compensation Committee retained a compensation consultant or advisor to assist the Board, the Compensation Committee in determining the compensation for any of the Corporation’s executive officers’ or directors’ compensation.

 

Benchmarking

 

For compensation relating to the financial year ended December 31, 2018, the Compensation Committee has selected a peer group for assessing compensation practices, which group has been approved by the Board. The selection of companies that make up the comparable group are intended to reflect a group of companies with which the Corporation competes for executive officers. The group was selected by identifying entities (i) with market capitalization ranging between $125 million and $1.1 billion, (ii) that are listed on the TSX or the TSX Venture Exchange, and (iii) with projects at a similar stage of development as the Corporation. The 2018 comparator group includes:

 

Continental Gold Inc.   Pure Gold Mining Inc.
     
Lundin Gold Inc.   Gold Standard Ventures Corp.
     
Osisko Mining Inc.   Sabina Gold & Silver Corp.
     
Victoria Gold Corp.   Equinox Gold Corp.

 

The Compensation Committee reviewed market data for the peer group to determine to confirm the appropriate level of base salaries, bonuses, long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) and total compensation for the Named Executive Officers. However, the Corporation did not engage in formal benchmarking and the Corporation did not position executive pay to reflect a single percentile within the peer group for each executive. While these general market comparisons represent useful guidelines, discretion may be used in setting individual executive pay so that it appropriately reflects the value and contributions of each executive, as well as the executive’s leadership, commitment to the Corporation’s values and potential for advancement.

 

Risks Associated with the Corporation’s Compensation Policies and Practices

 

The Compensation Committee and the Board have not formally assessed the implications of the risks associated with the Corporation’s compensation policies and practices. However, the Corporation does not believe that its compensation program for the financial year ended December 31, 2018 encouraged excessive or inappropriate risk taking as the Corporation’s employees received both fixed (salary) and variable compensation (discretionary bonus and options) designed to balance the level of risk-taking while focusing on generating long-term value.

 

37

 

 

Policy on Purchase of Financial Instruments

 

The Board has adopted a policy that prohibits the purchase by Named Executive Officers or directors of financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of equity securities granted as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by the Named Executive Officer or director. See “Statement of Corporate Governance – Corporate Policies – Anti-Hedging Policy”.

 

Elements of Named Executive Officer Compensation

 

The compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers in any year may consist of three primary components:

 

Element of Compensation Purpose of Element
Base Salary Base salaries are fixed and therefore provide a level of certainty for Named Executive Officers. They are also used to ensure the Corporation’s compensation programs remain competitive in the industry and to determine other compensation elements and benefits.
Short-term Incentive The objective of the short-term incentive plan is to reward Named Executive Officers for the achievement of annual corporate and individual goals.
Long-term Incentive The purpose of the Corporation’s LTIP is to attract, retain and award Named Executive Officers who are expected to significantly contribute to the success of the Corporation, incentivize them to perform at a high level and reward the achievement of creating long-term shareholder value.

 

The Corporation believes that making a significant portion of the Named Executive Officers’ compensation both variable and long-term supports the Corporation’s executive compensation philosophy, as these forms of compensation primarily depend on performance. At the same time, the Corporation emphasizes equity-based compensation to allow those most accountable for the Corporation’s long-term success to acquire and hold Common Shares. The key features of the three primary components of compensation are described below.

 

Base Salary

 

Base salary recognizes the value of an individual to the Corporation based on his or her role, skill, performance, contributions, leadership and potential. It is critical in attracting and retaining executive talent in the markets in which the Corporation competes for talent. Base salaries for the Named Executive Officers are reviewed annually. Any change in base salary of a Named Executive Officer will generally be determined by an assessment of such executive’s performance, a consideration of competitive compensation levels in companies similar to the Corporation (in particular, the peer group members described above) and a review of the performance of the Corporation as a whole and the role the executive officer played in such corporate performance.

 

38

 

 

Base salaries for the financial year ended December 31, 2018 were as follows:

 

Name and Position   Salary  
Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer   $ 450,000  
Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer   $ 225,000  
Hans Smit, Chief Operating Officer   $ 250,000  
Marc Prefontaine, Former President and Chief Executive Officer   $ 250,000 (1)
Paul Robertson, Former Chief Financial Officer   $ 213,750 (2)

 

Notes:

(1) Marc Prefontaine served as President and Chief Executive Officer until November 12, 2018. The amount shown is an annualized amount based on monthly base salary amounts paid until that date.
(2) Paul Robertson served as Chief Financial Officer until April 30, 2018. The amount shown is an annualized amount based on the year-to-date base salary amounts paid until then.

 

Effective January 1, 2019, the base salary of the Chief Financial Officer was increased to $250,000 per annum. There are no other expected increases to the base salaries of the Named Executive Officers for the financial year ending December 31, 2019.

 

Short-term Incentive Plan

 

Pursuant to the respective executive employment agreements, each of Mr. Simpson, Mr. Morin and Mr. Smit is entitled to a target short-term incentive as a percentage of base salary as set out in the table below. Mr. Prefontaine was similarly entitled to a target short-term incentive as a percentage of base salary during his term of employment. Mr. Robertson did not have a contractual target.

 

For the financial year ended December 31, 2018, short-term incentive awards were determined and awarded based on an assessment by the Compensation Committee of certain corporate and personal achievements. Each component may then have one or more objective and subjective goals with different weighting and measures.

 

The following is the short-term incentive award target as a percentage of base salary and the split between the corporate and personal components:

 

Position   Targeted Short-Term
Incentive
(% of Base Salary)
    Corporate
Objectives
    Individual
Performance
 
Chief Executive Officer     100 %     60 %     40 %
Chief Operating Officer     50 %     60 %     40 %
Chief Financial Officer     50 %     60 %     40 %

 

For the financial year ended December 31, 2018, the following corporate objectives were developed by the Chair of the Compensation Committee based on discussions with each of the executive officers. These corporate objectives were adopted and recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board:

 

39

 

 

2018 Corporate Objectives   Weight     Score  
Health & Safety     20 %     20 %
Lost Time Injury Rate of 0.30 per 200,000 hours worked
Result: There were no Lost Time Injuries during the year
               
Environmental     20 %     20 %
No category 3, 4 or 5 (serious through catastrophic) incidents as defined by EPA
Result: There were no incidents during the year
               
Community Affairs     20 %     20 %
Develop an effective and sustainable community program
Result: Programs were developed and maintained for both Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema Projects
               
Project Advancement     40 %     40 %
Advance projects in accordance with approved plans and budgets
Result: Advancement of the projects was according to plan and below budget
               
Total     100 %     100 %

 

Performance against the corporate objectives was assessed by the Compensation Committee at the end of the 2018 financial year based on its review of the achievement of the objective and subjective criteria noted above. It was determined that each corporate objective was met and achieved successfully during the course of the 2018.

 

Together with the Chair of the Compensation Committee, each executive also developed personal component objectives for 2018 that reflected strategic annual operational advancements, financial system implementation and improvements, development of internal teams and overall focus of leadership and communication of the executive team. For each executive, share price performance relative to the peer group was also assessed. The personal objectives were adopted and recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board.

 

Achievement of the personal objectives was based on an assessment by the Compensation Committee at the end of the 2018 financial year, including through consultations with Management on an as-needed basis. As Mr. Simpson was appointed on November 12, 2018, no individual objectives in respect of 2018 were set, and his achievement in 2018 was scored based entirely on corporate objectives.

 

On the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, as approved by the Board, short-term incentives awarded for the financial year ended December 31, 2018 were determined and awarded as follows:

 

40

 

 

Name and Position  

Targeted Award

(% of Base
Salary)
 

    Overall
Weighted Score
    Award     Actual Award
(% of Base
Salary)
 
Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer     100 %     100 %   $ 56,250 (1)     100 %
Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer     50 %     98 %   $ 110,700       49 %
Hans Smit, Chief Operating Officer     50 %     100 %   $ 125,000       50 %
Marc Prefontaine, Former President and Chief Executive Officer     60 %     100 %   $ 150,000       60 %
Paul Robertson, Former Chief Financial Officer     N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A  

 

(1) Mr. Simpson was appointed Chief Executive Officer on November 12, 2018. His award was pro-rated accordingly and the percentage of base salary reflect the percentage of award paid based on salary paid during the year.

 

2019 Corporate Objectives

 

For the financial year ending December 31, 2019, the following corporate objectives were developed by the Chair of the Compensation Committee based on discussions with each of the executive officers. These corporate objectives were adopted and recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board:

 

2019 Corporate Objectives   Weight  
Relative Share Price Performance vs Peer Group     10 %
Completion of the Feasibility Study on Camino Rojo by mid-year     20 %
Secure lay-back agreement on neighboring property     20 %
Complete financing for Construction of Camino Rojo by year end     20 %
Obtain Concession renewals at Cerro Quema by year end     20 %
Health & Safety; Environment; Community Affairs     10 %
   Lost Time Injury Rate <2.0 per 1,000,000 hours worked; no fatality        
   No category 3, 4 or 5 (serious through catastrophic) incidents as defined by EPA        
   Develop an effective and sustainable community program        
Total     100 %

 

Long-term Incentive Plan

 

The Corporation’s LTIP is an element of compensation that allows the Corporation to incentivize and retain its Named Executive Officers for their sustained contributions to the Corporation. These awards reward performance and continued employment by a Named Executive Officer, with associated benefits to Orla of attracting, motivating and retaining employees. The Corporation believes that a LTIP provides Named Executive Officers with a strong link to long-term corporate performance and the creation of shareholder value and the LTIP bonus payment is at the discretion of the Board. The LTIP aligns the interests of the Named Executive Officers with those of Shareholders by linking a significant portion of the executive’s total pay opportunity to share price performance, therefore providing long-term accountability. For a description of the material terms of the Stock Option Plan and RSU Plan, see Schedule “A” and Schedule “B”, respectively.

 

41

 

 

Previously, stock options were determined and granted based on a subjective determination by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, the Compensation Committee adopted a target LTIP grant based on a percentage of base salary for each executive, and allocated among stock options and RSUs as follows:

 

Position   Targeted LTIP
(% of Base Salary)
    Stock Options     RSUs  
Chief Executive Officer     150 %     40 %     60 %
Chief Operating Officer     100 %     40 %     60 %
Chief Financial Officer     100 %     40 %     60 %

 

On the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, as approved by the Board, stock option grants for the financial year ended December 31, 2018 were determined and awarded as follows:

 

Name and Position   Stock Options
Awarded
    Value of Stock
Options
Awarded
(1)
    RSUs
Awarded
(2)
    Value of RSUs
Awarded
(2)
 
Jason Simpson
President and Chief Executive Officer
    1,000,000 (3)   $ 595,300 (3)     NIL       NIL  
Etienne Morin     600,000 (4)   $ 340,080 (4)     108,000     $ 135,000  
Chief Financial Officer     159,292 (5)   $ 89,857 (5)                
Hans Smit
Chief Operating Officer
    176,991 (5)   $ 99,841 (5)     120,000     $ 150,000  
Marc Prefontaine
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
    176,991 (5)   $ 99,841 (5)     120,000     $ 150,000  
Paul Robertson
Former Chief Financial Officer
    NIL       NIL       NIL       NIL  

 

Notes:

 

(1) The grant date fair value of stock options is calculated using the Black-Scholes methodology. The Corporation chose to use the Black-Scholes model as the basis for calculating fair value of the options granted as this methodology is commonly accepted by issuers. The values presented are consistent with the accounting values used in the Corporation’s audited financial statements.
(2) The RSU’s awarded reflect the annual grant for 2018. The values were calculated using the market value at grant date, consistent with the approach used in the Corporation’s audited financial statements.
(3) Reflects a special one-time grant when Mr. Simpson was appointed Chief Executive Officer. These options are exercisable at a price of $1.30 until November 13, 2023. The key assumptions used under the Black-Scholes model that were used for this award were: risk-free interest rate – 2.36%; expected life – 5 years; expected annualized volatility – 50%; expected dividend rate – nil.
(4) Reflects a special one-time grant when Mr. Morin was appointed Chief Financial Officer. These options are exercisable at a price of $1.25 until May 31, 2023. The key assumptions used under the Black-Scholes model that were used for this award were: risk-free interest rate – 2.05%; expected life – 5 years; expected annualized volatility – 50%; expected dividend rate – nil.
(5) Reflects the annual grant for 2018. These options are exercisable at a price of $1.25 until June 27, 2023. The key assumptions used under the Black-Scholes model that were used for the share option awards in the table above were: risk-free interest rate – 1.90%; expected life – 5 years; expected annualized volatility – 50%; expected dividend rate – nil.

 

Benefit Plans

 

As of January 1, 2019, the Corporation provides a group benefit plan to the employees of the Corporation in which the Named Executive Officers participate. The terms of the group benefit plan are customary. The Corporation does not provide any post-retirement benefits to any of the Named Executive Officers or employees of the Corporation.

 

42

 

 

Pension Plans

 

The Named Executive Officers do not participate in any defined benefit pension plan, defined contribution plan or deferred compensation plan.

 

Performance Graph

 

The following table and graph compares the cumulative total Shareholder return for $100 invested in Common Shares of the Corporation from June 30, 2015, the date of the Corporation’s name change and new Board, to December 31, 2018 against the cumulative shareholder return of each of the S&P/TSX Composite Index and the S&P/TSX Composite Gold Index for the same period.

 

    June 2015     December 2015     December 2016     December 2017     December 2018  
Orla Mining Ltd.     100.00       87.50       781.25       1,112.50       656.25  
S&P/TSX Composite Index     100.00       90.86       110.01       120.02       109.35  
S&P/TSX Composite Gold Index     100.00       87.01       128.55       125.98       117.94  

 

 

 

On June 10, 2015, at the annual and special shareholders meeting, the shareholders of the Corporation approved the name change from Red Mile Minerals Corp. to “Orla Mining Ltd.” and unanimously voted in favor of the proposed Director nominees. This name change and election of the Board of Directors marked the start of the Corporation as it exists today. Since that time, the Corporation has undergone two significant acquisitions, being (i) the acquisition of Pershimco Resources Inc. and the Cerro Quema project Los Santos Province, Panama in December 2016, and (ii) the acquisition of the Camino Rojo project in Zacatecas State, Mexico in November 2017. During 2018, the Corporation achieved a number of additional milestones, including entering into agreements to acquire certain interests in Nevada, completion of a $30 million bought deal offering, the appointments of Jason Simpson as Chief Executive Officer and Etienne Morin as Chief Financial Officer, and the results of a position preliminary economic assessment on the Camino Rojo project. In addition, on November 1, 2018, the Common Shares commenced trading on the TSX and were delisted from trading on the TSX Venture Exchange.

 

43

 

 

During the periods indicated, the total return to shareholders has generally outperformed both the S&P/TSX Composite Index and the S&P/TSX Composite Gold Index. Over the same period, Orla saw a significant increase in the scope and complexity of its operations as it completed the various acquisitions and transitioned to a more advanced development company. This included the addition of a Chief Operating Officer to the management team. Consequently, aggregate total compensation awarded to the current Named Executive Officers has increased significantly since 2015. The Compensation Committee considers that the increase in compensation over the period is appropriate given the increase in scope and complexity of the Corporation’s operations and the achievements made during this time.

 

The Compensation Committee remains committed to ensuring that its executive compensation program is aligned with Shareholder values and rewards performance. Equity-based compensation represents a significant portion of each Named Executive Officer’s total compensation, and is considered to be performance-based, at-risk compensation. Accordingly, its value will naturally fluctuate along with any fluctuations in the market performance of the Common Shares.

 

The Compensation Committee believes that the Company's short- and long-term programs continue to align executive pay with the performance objectives required to create and maintain Shareholder value.

 

44

 

 

 

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table summarizes the compensation paid to or earned by the Named Executive Officers during the financial years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.

 

                            Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation (4)
               
Name and
Principal Position
of Named
Executive Officer
  Year (1)     Salary
($)
    Share-based
awards
(2)
($)
    Option-
based
awards
(3)
($)
    Annual
Incentive
Plans ($)
    Long-Term
Incentive
Plans ($)
  Pension
Value
($)
    All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
Compensation
($)
 
Jason Simpson     2018     $ 61,250      $ 537,000 (6)    $ 595,300     $ 56,250     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 1,249,800  
President and Chief Executive Officer (5)     2017       Nil       Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil  
      2016       Nil       Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil  
Etienne Morin     2018     $ 150,000     $ 135,000     $ 429,937     $ 110,700     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 825,637  
Chief Financial Officer (7)     2017       Nil       Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil  
      2016       Nil       Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil  
Hans Smit     2018     $ 250,000     $ 150,000     $ 99,841     $ 125,000     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 624,841  
Chief Operating Officer (8)     2017     $ 250,000       Nil     $ 366,327     $ 125,000     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 741,327  
      2016     $ 20,833       Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil    $  102,500 (9)  $ 123,333  
Marc Prefontaine     2018     $ 250,000     $ 150,000     $ 99,841     $ 150,000     Nil     Nil    $ 400,000 (14)  $ 1,049,841  
Former President and CEO (10)     2017     $ 250,000       Nil     $ 366,327     $ 150,000     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 766,327  
      2016     $ 83,333       Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil    $ 40,000 (11) $ 123,333  
Paul Robertson     2018       Nil       Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil    $ 71,250 (13) $ 71,250  
Former Chief Financial Officer (12)     2017       Nil       Nil     $ 413,280     $ 75,000     Nil     Nil    $ 173,088 (13) $ 661,368  
      2016       Nil       Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil    $ 143,418 (13) $ 143,418  

 

Notes:
(1) Financial years ended December 31.
(2) These include restricted stock units, and in the case of Mr. Simpson also include CEO Bonus Shares.
(3) The fair value of stock options was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The assumptions used for the grants in 2018 are presented on page 42.
(4) The figures presented are for amounts earned in respect of the year, paid in the subsequent year.
(5) Mr. Simpson was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation on November 12, 2018. Mr. Simpson is also a director of the Corporation and does not receive any additional compensation for that role.
(6) The Board approved a one-time award of 1,000,000 Common Shares (the “CEO Bonus Shares”) on November 12, 2018 to Mr. Simpson in consideration for Mr. Simpson acting as President and Chief Executive Officer and director of the Corporation. The CEO Bonus Shares have staged vesting restrictions based upon the Corporation’s achievement of certain 30-day volume weighted average trading price levels on the TSX, at which times a specified portion of the CEO Bonus Shares will become issuable to Mr. Simpson, unless the CEO Bonus Shares sooner vest upon a change of control as defined in the award agreement. These CEO Bonus shares have a grant date fair value estimated at $537,000 which value is consistent with the approach used in the Corporation’s audited financial statements.
(7) Mr. Morin was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation on April 30, 2018.
(8) Mr. Smit was appointed Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation on June 10, 2015. Mr. Smit is also a director of the Corporation and does not receive any additional compensation for that role.
(9) Fees for services as Chief Operating Officer paid to Hans Smit, P.Geo. Inc., a private company controlled by Mr. Smit.
(10) Mr. Prefontaine served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation from June 10, 2015 to November 12, 2018. Mr. Prefontaine served as director of the Corporation and did not receive any additional compensation for that role.
(11) Fees for services as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation paid to Pref-Ex Geological Inc., a private company controlled by Mr. Prefontaine.
(12) Mr. Robertson served as Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation from June 10, 2015 to April 30, 2018.
(13) Fees paid to Quantum Advisory Partners LLP (a registered limited liability partnership of which Mr. Robertson is an incorporated partner), for Chief Financial Officer and accounting, tax compliance, and corporate secretarial services.
(14) Amounts paid to Mr. Prefontaine pursuant to his departure as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

 

45

 

 

Named Executive Officers – Outstanding Option-Based Awards

 

The table below reflects the incentive plan awards outstanding as at December 31, 2018.

 

  Option-Based Awards   Share-Based Awards
Name and
Principal
Occupation
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (1)

(#)  
    Option
Exercise
Price
($)
    Option Expiry
Date
    Value of
Unexercised In-
the-Money
Options (2)
  ($)  
  Number of
Shares or
Units That
Have Not
Vested  
(#)
    Market or
Payout Value
of Share-
Based Awards
That Have
Not Vested
($)
  Market or
Payout Value
of Vested
Share-Based
Awards not
Paid Out or
Distributed
($)
  Number of
Unvested
RSUs
(#)
    Market Value
of Unvested
RSUs
($)
 
Jason Simpson
President and Chief Executive Officer
    1,000,000     $ 1.30     Nov 13, 2023     Nil   1,000,000 (5)    N/A   N/A   Nil       Nil  
Etienne Morin
Chief Financial Officer
    600,000
159,292
    $
$
1.25
1.25
    May 31, 2023
June 27, 2023
    Nil
Nil
  Nil     N/A   N/A   108,000 (3)    $ 113,400  
Hans Smit
Chief Operating Officer
    225,000
600,000
176,991
    $
$
0.15
1.39
1.25
    Nov 27, 2020
June 23, 2022
June 27, 2023
  202,500
Nil
Nil
  Nil     N/A   N/A   120,000 (3)   $ 126,000  
Marc Prefontaine
Former President and CEO
    225,000
600,000
176,991
    $
$
0.15
1.39
1.25
    Dec 31, 2019
Dec 31, 2019
Dec 31, 2019
  $ 202,500
Nil
Nil
  Nil     N/A   N/A   120,000  (4)   $ 126,000  
Paul Robertson
Former CFO
    300,000     $ 1.39     June 23, 2022     Nil   Nil     N/A   N/A   Nil       Nil  

 

Notes:

(1) Each option entitles the holder to purchase one Common Share.
(2) Calculated using the closing market price of the Common Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2018 of $1.05 and subtracting the exercise price of in-the-money stock options. These stock options have not been, and may never be, exercised and actual gains, if any, on exercise will depend on the value of the Common Shares on the date of exercise.
(3) These RSUs vest as to one third each on the first, second, and third anniversary dates of award.
(4) These RSUs vested on December 31, 2018 in connection with Mr. Prefontaine’s resignation.
(5) The Board approved a one-time award of 1,000,000 CEO Bonus Shares on November 12, 2018 to Mr. Simpson in consideration for Mr. Simpson acting as President and Chief Executive Officer and director of the Corporation. The CEO Bonus Shares have staged vesting restrictions based upon the Corporation’s achievement of certain 30-day volume weighted average trading price levels on the TSX, at which times a specified portion of the CEO Bonus Shares will become issuable to Mr. Simpson, unless the CEO Bonus Shares sooner vest upon a change of control as defined in the award agreement.

 

46

 

 

Named Executive Officers – Incentive Award Plan – Value Vested or Earned During the Year

 

The following table provides information concerning the value vested or earned under incentive award plans of the Corporation with respect to each Named Executive Officer during the financial year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Name and Principal Position of
Named Executive Officer
  Option-Based
Awards – Value
Vested During the
Year (1)
($)  
  Share-Based Awards
– Value Vested
During the Year (2)
($)  
    Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation - Value
Earned During the
Year (3)
($)  
 
Jason Simpson
President and Chief Executive Officer
  Nil     Nil     $ 56,250  
Etienne Morin
Chief Financial Officer
  Nil     Nil     $ 110,700  
Hans Smit
Chief Operating Officer
  Nil     Nil     $ 125,000  
Marc Prefontaine
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
  Nil   $ 126,000     $ 150,000  
Paul Robertson
Former Chief Financial Officer
  Nil     Nil       Nil  

 

Note:

(1) “Value vested during the year” means the aggregate dollar value that would have been realized if the options under the option-based award had been exercised on the vesting date. This amount is calculated by determining the difference between the market price of underlying securities at exercise and the exercise or base price of the options under the option-based award on the vesting date.
(2) “Value vested during the year” means the aggregate dollar value of the Common Shares that are issued on the vesting of the RSUs. This amount is calculated using the closing market price of the Common Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2018 of $1.05
(3) Reflects the annual bonus paid to each Named Executive Officer.

 

Termination and Change of Control Benefits

 

Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

The employment agreement dated October 14, 2018, between the Corporation and Mr. Simpson provides that if the Corporation terminates Mr. Simpson’s employment without cause or in the event Mr. Simpson terminates for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Simpson will be entitled to an amount equal to 12 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned through that 12 month period based on the average annual bonus in the three years immediately preceding termination. In addition, any unvested stock options shall immediately vest upon notification of termination. If there is a change of control (as defined in the employment agreement), and within 12 months of such change of control, there is a termination by the Corporation without cause or termination by Mr. Simpson for good reason, Mr. Simpson will be entitled to an amount equal to 24 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned though that 24 month period.

 

Mr. Simpson’s agreement contains non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions.

 

47

 

 

Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer

 

The employment agreement dated March 13, 2018, between the Corporation and Mr. Morin provides that if the Corporation terminates Mr. Morin’s employment without cause or in the event Mr. Morin terminates for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Morin will be entitled to an amount equal to 12 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned through that 12 month period based on the average annual bonus in the three years immediately preceding termination. If there is a change of control (as defined in the employment agreement), and within 12 months of such change of control, there is a termination by the Corporation without cause or termination by Mr. Morin for good reason, Mr. Morin will be entitled to an amount equal to 24 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned though that 24 month period.

 

Mr. Morin’s agreement contains non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions.

 

Hans Smit, Chief Operating Officer

 

The employment agreement dated December 1, 2016, as amended March 23, 2018, between the Corporation and Mr. Smit provides that if the Corporation terminates Mr. Smit’s employment without cause or in the event Mr. Smit terminates for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Smit will be entitled to an amount equal to 12 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned through that 12 month period based on the average annual bonus in the three years immediately preceding termination. If there is a change of control (as defined in the employment agreement), and within 12 months of such change of control, there is a termination by the Corporation without cause or termination by Mr. Smit for good reason, Mr. Smit will be entitled to an amount equal to 24 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned though that 24 month period.

 

Mr. Smit’s agreement contains non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions.

 

Marc Prefontaine, former President and Chief Executive Officer

 

The employment agreement dated December 1, 2016 (amended March 23, 2018) between the Corporation and Mr. Prefontaine was terminated in accordance with a separation agreement on November 12, 2018. The agreement provided that if the Corporation terminated Mr. Prefontaine’s employment without cause or in the event Mr. Prefontaine terminates for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Prefontaine would be entitled to an amount equal to 12 months of his base salary plus a lump sum payment equal to the bonus he would have earned through that 12 month period based on the average annual bonus in the three years immediately preceding termination. Severance of $400,000 was paid to Mr. Prefontaine pursuant to the terms of a severance agreement.

 

Mr. Prefontaine’s agreement contained non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions, which continued under the terms of such agreement following his separation.

 

48

 

 

Estimated Incremental Payments on Termination or Change of Control

 

Pursuant to the applicable employment agreements, if a severance payment triggering event had occurred on December 31, 2018, the severance payments that would be payable to each of Messrs. Simpson, Morin and Smit would have been as follows:

 

Name and Position   Termination without Cause
or Resignation for Good
Reason
($)
    Termination without Cause
or Resignation for Good
Reason
+
Change of Control
($)
 
Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer   $ 900,000     $ 1,800,000  
Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer   $ 337,500     $ 675,000  
Hans Smit, Chief Operating Officer   $ 375,000     $ 750,000  
Total:   $ 1,612,500     $ 3,225,000  

 

Mr. Prefontaine ceased to act as the President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Robertson ceased to act as the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation during 2018. Amounts paid or payable in connection with their severances are reflected in the summary compensation table.

 

Director Compensation

 

The objective of the Corporation’s compensation program for directors is to attract and retain members of the Board of a quality and nature that will enhance the sustainable profitability and growth of the Corporation. Director compensation is intended to provide an appropriate level of remuneration considering the experience, responsibilities, time requirements and accountability of their roles.

 

In addition, in order to appropriately align the interests of members of the Board with those of Shareholders, the Board has implemented a director share ownership policy. See “Statement of Corporate Governance – Corporate Governance Policies – Share Ownership Policy.”

 

Upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board has approved a compensation package for directors as follows:

 

(i) an annual retainer for each non-executive director (other than the Chair) of $25,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $6,250) for acting as directors of the Corporation;

 

(ii) an annual retainer for the Chair of $50,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $12,500) for acting as Chair of the Board;

 

(iii) an additional annual retainer for the Chair of the Audit Committee of $10,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $2,500) for acting as the Chair of such committee;

 

(iv) an additional annual retainer for the Chair of the Compensation Committee of $5,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $1,250) for acting as the Chair of such committee. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, the additional retainer was increased to $10,000 annually;

 

(v) an additional annual retainer for the Chair of the Environmental, Health and Safety Committee of $5,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $1,250) for acting as the Chair of such committee; and

 

(vi) an additional annual retainer for the Chair of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee of $5,000 (payable in quarterly amounts of $1,250) for acting as the Chair of such committee.

 

49

 

 

The following table sets out certain information respecting the compensation paid to directors of the Corporation who were not Named Executive Officers during the financial year ended December 31, 2018:

 

Director’s Name (1)   Fees
earned ($)
    Share-based
awards ($)
    Option-based
awards (1) ($)
    Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation ($)
  Pension
value ($)
    All other
compensation
($)
  Total ($)  
Charles Jeannes   $ 50,000     $ 75,000     $ 77,700     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 202,700  
George Albino   $ 33,750     $ 38,000     $ 37,440     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 109,190  
Tim Haldane   $ 30,000     $ 38,000     $ 37,440     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 105,440  
Richard Hall   $ 30,000     $ 38,000     $ 37,440     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 105,440  
Jean Robitaille   $ 25,000     $ 38,000     $ 37,440     Nil     Nil     Nil   $ 100,440  
David Stephens (2)     Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil  
Steven Thomas (3)     Nil       Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil  

 

Notes:

(1) The fair value of stock options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculation: risk-free interest rate – 1.90%; expected life – 5 years; expected annualized volatility – 50%; expected dividend rate – nil. The Corporation selected the Black-Scholes model given its prevalence of use within North America. This is consistent with the methodology used by the Corporation in its audited financial statements.
(2) Mr. David Stephens was appointed to the Board in March 2018 and is the director nominee of Newmont. As an employee of Goldcorp, he voluntarily waived all compensation entitlements in 2018.
(3) Mr. Steven Thomas ceased to be a director on March 29, 2018, and was previously the director nominee of Goldcorp.

 

50

 

 

Directors – Option-Based and Share-Based Awards

 

The table below reflects the incentive plan awards outstanding as at December 31, 2018.

 

    Option-Based Awards   Share-Based Awards  
Name   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)  
    Option
Exercise
Price
($)
    Option
Expiry Date
    Value of
Unexercised
In- the-
Money
Options (1)

($)  
  Number of
Shares or
Units That
Have Not
Vested

(#)  
      Market or
Payout
Value of
Share-
Based
Awards
That Have
Not Vested(2)
 
($)  
    Market or
Payout
Value of
Vested
Share-Based
Awards not
Paid Out or
Distributed

($)  
    Number of
DSUs(3)

(#)  
      Market
Value of
Unvested
DSUs
  ($)  
 
Charles Jeannes   600,000
132,743
  $
1.39
1.25
    June 23, 2022
June 27, 2023
    Nil
Nil
  500,000  (4)   $ 525,000     N/A     60,000       63,000  
George Albino   300,000
66,372
  $
1.39
1.25
    June 23, 2022
June 27, 2023
    Nil
Nil
  Nil       Nil     Nil     30,000       31,500  
Tim Haldane   300,000
66,372
  $
1.39
1.25
    June 23, 2022
June 27, 2023
    Nil
Nil
  Nil       Nil     Nil     30,000       31,500  
Richard Hall   175,000
300,000
66,372
  $
$
0.15
1.39
1.25
    Nov 27, 2020
June 23, 2022
June 27, 2023
  $

157,500

Nil
Nil

  Nil       Nil     Nil     30,000       31,500  
Jean Robitaille   19,000
28,500
300,000
66,372
  $
$
$
$

1.48
0.81
1.39
1.25

    Oct 1, 2019
Dec 3, 2020
June 23, 2022
June 27, 2023
 

Nil

6,840

Nil
Nil

  Nil       Nil     Nil     30,000       31,500  
David Stephens   Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil   Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil       Nil  
Steven Thomas   Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil   Nil       Nil     Nil     Nil       Nil  

 

Note:

(1) Calculated using the closing market price of the Common Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2018 of $1.05 and subtracting the exercise price of in-the-money stock options. These stock options have not been, and may never be, exercised and actual gains, if any, on exercise will depend on the value of the Common Shares on the date of exercise.
(2) Calculated using market price at December 31, 2018 of $1.05.
(3) DSU awards vest immediately upon award. However, DSUs can only be redeemed when the DSU holder ceases to be a director of the Company. For more meaningful disclosure, information is provided on unredeemed DSUs rather than unvested DSUs (there are no unvested DSUs).
(4) Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board approved a one-time award of 500,000 Common Shares (the “Bonus Shares”) to Mr. Jeannes at a deemed issue price of $1.39 per Bonus Share (the “Issue Price”) in consideration for Mr. Jeannes acting as Chairman of the Board, which Bonus Shares have certain trading restrictions. The Issue Price is equal to the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSXV on June 23, 2017. The Bonus Shares will become issuable on the date Mr. Jeannes ceases to act as a director following June 18, 2020. If at any time prior Mr. Jeannes ceases to act as a director there is a change of control, the Bonus Shares will immediately vest and Mr. Jeannes will be entitled to receive any securities, property or cash to which he would have been entitled to receive upon such change of control if the Bonus Shares had vested immediately prior to the applicable record date or event, as the case may be.

 

51

 

 

Directors – Incentive Plan Awards – Value Vested or Earned During the Year

 

The following table provides information concerning the value vested or earned under incentive award plans of the Corporation with respect to each non-executive director of the Corporation during the financial year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Name of Director   Option-Based Awards -
Value Vested During the
Year
(1)
($)  
  Share-Based Awards –
Value Vested During the
Year
(2)
($)  
    Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation - Value Earned
During the Year
($)
Charles Jeannes   Nil   $ 75,000     Nil
George Albino   Nil   $ 38,000     Nil
Tim Haldane   Nil   $ 38,000     Nil
Richard Hall   Nil   $ 38,000     Nil
Jean Robitaille   Nil   $ 38,000     Nil
David Stephens   Nil     Nil     Nil
Steven Thomas   Nil     Nil     Nil

 

Note:

(1) “Value vested during the year” for option-based awards means the aggregate dollar value that would have been realized if the options under the option-based award had been exercised on the vesting date. This amount is calculated by determining the difference between the market price of underlying securities at exercise and the exercise or base price of the options under the option-based award on the vesting date.
(2) “Value vested during the year” for share-based awards means the aggregate dollar value that would have been realized had the shares had been paid out on the date of vesting.

 

52

 

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under the
Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table sets forth aggregated information as at December 31, 2018, with respect to the compensation plan of the Corporation under which equity securities of the Corporation are authorized for issuance.

 

Plan Category       Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
(a)
    Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights  (b)
    Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
under Equity
Compensation Plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders   Stock options     8,981,505     $ 1.23       12,931,462 (1)
    RSUs     368,000       N/A       2,632,000 (2)
    DSUs     180,000       N/A       1,820,000 (3)
    Total     9,529,505               17,383,462  
Equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders   Stock options (4)     142,500     $ 1.12        
Total:         9,672,005               17,383,462  

 

Note:

(1) The aggregate number of Common Shares reserved for issuance in respect of all outstanding Options granted under the Stock Option Plan and all other security-based compensation arrangements of the Corporation cannot exceed 10% of the number of issued and outstanding Common Shares (on a non-diluted basis).
(2) The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares available for issuance under the RSU Plan shall not exceed 3,000,000 Common Shares.
(3) The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares that may be issued under the DSU Plan shall not exceed 2,000,000 Common Shares.
(4) Reflects options previously issued by Pershimco Resources Inc. and each such option issued became exercisable for one Common Share in connection with the Pershimco Acquisition.

 

Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers

 

None of the directors and executive officers, or former directors or executive officers, nor any associate of such individuals, of the Corporation is as at the date hereof, or has been, during the financial year ended December 31, 2018, indebted to the Corporation or its subsidiaries in connection with a purchase of securities or otherwise. In addition, no indebtedness of these individuals to another entity has been the subject of a guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or similar arrangement or understanding with Orla or any of its subsidiaries.

 

Interest of Informed Persons in Material Transactions

 

Management is not aware of any material interest, direct or indirect, of any informed person of the Corporation, any proposed director or any associate or affiliate of any informed person or proposed director in any transaction since the commencement of our most recently completed financial year, or in any proposed transaction, that has materially affected or would materially affect Orla or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries.

 

53

 

 

Other Business

 

Management knows of no amendment, variation or other matter to come before the Meeting other than those set forth in the Notice of Meeting. However, if any other matter properly comes before the Meeting, the Common Shares represented by the accompanying proxy will be voted on such matter in accordance with the best judgment of the person or persons voting the proxy.

 

Additional Information

 

Additional information relating to the Corporation can be found under the Corporation’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Additional financial information is provided in the Corporation’s comparative financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, and related and management’s discussion and analysis which can be found under the Corporation’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or on the Corporation’s website at www.orlamining.com Shareholders may also obtain these documents, without charge, upon request to the President at Orla Mining Ltd., Suite 202 - 595 Howe St, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2T5.

 

Approval of Directors

 

The contents and the sending of this Circular have been approved by the directors of the Corporation.

 

DATED as of the 9th day of May 2019.

 

  “Jason Simpson”
  JASON SIMPSON
  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

54

 

 

Schedule “A” 

 

STOCK OPTION PLAN SUMMARY

 

At the Meeting, Shareholders are being asked to approve certain amendments to the Stock Option Plan, as detailed in the Circular. The following provides a summary of the Stock Option Plan prior to any such amendments being made.

 

The Stock Option Plan shall be administered by the Board or a committee established by the Board for that purpose. Subject to approval of the granting of options by the Board, the Corporation shall grant options under the Stock Option Plan.

 

The Stock Option Plan provides that the aggregate number of Common Shares of the Corporation which may be available for issuance under the Stock Option Plan will not exceed 10% of the total number of Common Shares of the Corporation issued and outstanding from time to time.

 

(a) The total number of options which may be granted to any one person under the Stock Option Plan within any 12 month period shall not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Corporation, calculated on the date an option is granted to such individual, unless the Corporation has obtained the requisite disinterested Shareholder approval.

 

(b) The maximum number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance under options granted to insiders (as a group) under the Stock Option Plan, together with any other of the Corporation’s previously established and outstanding stock option plans or grants, shall be 10% of the Common Shares issued and outstanding at the time of the grant (on a non-diluted basis).

 

(c) The maximum number of options which may be granted to insiders (as a group) under the Stock Option Plan, together with any other of the Corporation’s previously established and outstanding stock option plans or grants, within any 12 month period shall be 10% of the issued Common Shares, calculated on the date an option is granted to any insider (on a non-diluted basis).

 

(d) The maximum number of options which may be granted to any one consultant under the Stock Option Plan, together with any other of the Corporation’s previously established and outstanding stock option plans or grants, within any 12 month period, must not exceed 2% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares, calculated at the date an option is granted to such consultant (on a non-diluted basis).

 

(e) The maximum number of options which may be granted to all investor relations persons under the Stock Option Plan, together with any other of the Corporation’s previously established and outstanding stock option plans or grants, within any 12 month period, must not exceed, 2% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares, calculated at the date an option is granted to any such Investor Relations Person (on a non-diluted basis).

 

The exercise price for the Common Shares of the Corporation under each option shall be determined by the Board on the basis of the “market price” (as set out in the Stock Option Plan). The exercise of options issued may not be less than the market price of the Common Shares at the time the option is granted, less any discounts allowed by the TSX (subject to the minimum exercise price allowed by the TSX). Subject to the provisions of the Stock Option Plan and the particular option, an option may be exercised by delivering a written notice of exercise to the Corporation along with payment in cash or certified cheque for the full amount of the purchase price of the Common Shares then being purchased.

 

 

 

 

The period within which options may be exercised and the number of options which may be exercised in any such period are determined by the Board at the time of granting the options provided, however, that the maximum term of any options awarded under the Stock Option Plan is 10 years. On the expiry date of an option it will expire and terminate, subject to any extension of such expiry date permitted in accordance with the Stock Option Plan.

 

An optionee who ceases to be an Eligible Person for any reason other than as a result of having been dismissed for cause or as a result of the optionee's death, may exercise any vested and unexpired options held by such optionee for a period of 90 days from the date of cessation (unless such period is extended by the Board to a maximum of 12 months from cessation), or 30 days if the Eligible Person is engaged in investor relations activities. In the event of death of an optionee, the optionee’s representative may exercise any vested and unexpired options held by the optionee for a period of 12 months from the optionee’s death. If an optionee ceases to be either an Eligible Person as a result of having been dismissed from any such position for cause, all unexercised option rights of that optionee under the Stock Option Plan shall immediately become terminated and shall lapse, notwithstanding the original term of the option granted to such optionee under the Stock Option Plan.

 

In the event that the expiry date of an option falls within a trading blackout period imposed by the Corporation, and neither the Corporation nor the individual in possession of the options is subject to a cease trade order in respect of the Corporation’s securities, then the expiry date of such option shall be automatically extended to the 10th business day following the end of the blackout period.

 

Options granted under the Stock Option Plan will be non-assignable and non-transferable by an optionee other than pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and such option will be exercisable, during an optionee’s lifetime, only by the optionee.

 

The Stock Option Plan contains provisions for the treatment and appropriate adjustment of options in relation to capital changes and with regard to a reorganization, recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares, merger, consolidation, rights offering or any other change in the corporate structure or shares of the Corporation. The options granted under the Stock Option Plan may contain such provisions as the Board may determine with respect to adjustments to be made in the number and kind of shares covered by such options and in the option price in the event of any such change. If the Corporation determines that, in the event of a transaction, offer or proposal which would constitute an Acceleration Event (as defined in the Stock Option Plan) or if the Corporation seeks approval from Shareholders for such a transaction, and, provided that the Board has determined that no adjustment shall be made pursuant to the Stock Option Plan,(i) the Board may permit the optionee to exercise all unexercised options (regardless of any vesting restrictions) granted under the Stock Option Plan, so that the optionee may participate in such transaction, offer or proposal; and (ii) the Board may require the acceleration of the time for the exercise of the said option and of the time for the fulfilment of any conditions or restrictions on such exercise.

 

Subject to any requisite shareholder and regulatory approvals, the Board may at any time amend or terminate the Stock Option Plan.

  

 

 

 

EXHIBIT A

  

Blacklined copy of the proposed amendments to the Stock Option Plan
(the “Option Plan Amendments”)

 

See attached.

  

 

 

  

Schedule “B” 

 

RSU PLAN SUMMARY

 

At the Meeting, Shareholders are being asked to approve certain amendments to the RSU Plan, as detailed in the Circular. The following provides a summary of the RSU Plan prior to any such amendments being made.

 

The RSU Plan provides that restricted share unit awards may be granted by the Board, or, if the Board so delegates, by the Compensation Committee which administers the RSU Plan to eligible employees, directors, officers and consultants of the Corporation or an affiliate in a calendar year as a bonus for services rendered to the Corporation or an affiliate in the fiscal year ending in such year, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee. The number of RSUs awarded will be credited to the participant’s account effective as of the grant date. The Compensation Committee shall from time to time determine the participants to whom RSUs shall be granted and the provisions and restrictions with respect to such grant and the Compensation Committee may take into consideration the present and potential contributions of and the services rendered by the particular participant to the success of the Corporation and any other factors which the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and relevant.

 

The aggregate maximum number of Common Shares available for issuance under the RSU Plan shall not exceed 3,000,000. The maximum number of RSUs available for grant to any one person, in a 12 month period, pursuant to the RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation, is 5% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of Common Shares reserved for issuance under RSUs granted to insiders (as a group), at any time, pursuant to the RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of RSUs which may be granted to insiders (as a group), within any one year period, pursuant to the RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of RSUs available for grant to any one eligible consultant, within any 12 month period, pursuant to the RSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the corporation, is 2% of the total number of Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of RSUs available for grant to all investor relations persons, within any 12 month period, pursuant to this Plan and any other Security Based Compensation Arrangements of the Corporation, is 2% of the total number of Shares then outstanding. The maximum value of RSUs which may be granted to each director who is not also an eligible employee shall not exceed $150,000 (based on the closing trading price of the Common Shares on the grant date of an RSU or DSU (as defined below), as the case may be (the “Market Value”) in any financial year.

 

For purposes of determining the number of Common Shares that remain available for issuance under the RSU Plan, the number of Common Shares underlying any grants of RSUs that are surrendered, forfeited, waived, repurchased by the Corporation and/or cancelled shall be added back to the RSU Plan and again be available for future grant, whereas the number of Common Shares underlying any grants of RSUs that are issued shall not be available for future grant.

 

Each RSU granted to a participant for services rendered entitles the holder, subject to the terms of the RSU Plan, to receive: (i) one Common Share for each RSU; or (ii) a cash payment equal to the number of RSUs multiplied by the fair market value (as defined in the RSU Plan) of one Common Share on the vesting date; or (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii), as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, on the date when the RSU award is fully vested (the “Participant’s Entitlement Date”). The Compensation Committee will have the absolute discretion to credit a participant with additional RSUs equal to the aggregate amount of any dividends that would have been paid to the participant if the RSUs had been Common Shares, divided by the Market Value of the Common Shares on the date on which dividends were paid by the Corporation.

 

 

 

 

Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, in the event that any Participant’s Entitlement Date expires during, or within 48 hours after a self-imposed blackout period on the trading of securities of the Corporation, such expiry will occur on the day immediately following the end of the blackout period, or such 48 hour period, as applicable, provided that under no circumstances shall the Participant’s Entitlement Date be later than December 15th of the third calendar year following the calendar year in which the RSUs were granted.

 

If the employment or services of the participant that has been continuously employed by the Corporation or an affiliate since the date the RSUs were granted are terminated prior to the Participant’s Entitlement Date, for any reason other than death, disability, termination without cause or resignation for good reason, then, except as provided for in the RSU grant letter or as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, all unvested RSUs will be forfeited by the participant, and be of no further force and effect, as of the date of termination. In the event of termination without cause or resignation for good reason, the participant’s unvested RSUs will vest in full on the date of termination and the Common Shares and/or cash underlying the RSUs credited to the participant’s account shall be issued and/or paid to the participant as soon as practicable thereafter, provided, that for a participant who is a United States taxpayer, the date of issuance or payment shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the Participant’s termination without cause or for good reason and provided further, that such participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of payment. In the event of death, all unvested RSUs credited to the participant will vest on the date of the participant’s death and the Common Shares and/or cash underlying the RSUs credited to the participant’s account shall be issued and/or paid to the participant’s estate as soon as practicable thereafter, provided, that for a participant who is a United States taxpayer, the date of issuance or payment shall not be more than 90 days after the date of the participant’s death and provided further, that such Participant’s estate does not have a choice as to the taxable year of payment. In the event of the total disability of a participant, all unvested RSUs credited to the participant will vest in full within 90 days following the date on which the participant is determined to be totally disabled, and the Common Shares and/or cash underlying such RSUs credited to the participant’s account shall be issued and/or paid to the participant as soon as practicable thereafter, provided, that for a participant who is a United States taxpayer, s the date of issuance or payment shall not be more than 90 days after the date on which the participant is determined to be totally disabled and provided further, that such Participant does not have a choice as to the taxable year of payment. In any event, upon a Change of Control (as defined in the RSU Plan), all unvested RSUs outstanding shall immediately vest on the date of such Change of Control notwithstanding any stated vesting period. In any event, upon a Change of Control, participants shall not be treated any more favourably than Shareholders with respect to the consideration that the participants would be entitled to receive for the Common Shares underlying the RSUs, provided, however, that for a participant who is a United States taxpayer, the Change of Control must also constitute a “change in control event” as set forth in Treas. Reg. §1.409A-3(i)(5)(i) and provided further, that any issuance or payment must occur in full within five years of the date of the Change of Control.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the RSU Plan, the Board or the Compensation Committee, as the case may be, may discontinue or amend the RSU Plan at any time, provided that, without the consent of a participant, such discontinuance or amendment may not in any manner adversely affect the participant’s rights under any RSU granted under the RSU Plan.

 

The Board or the Compensation Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory and Shareholder approval, make the following amendments to the RSU Plan:

 

(f) amendments to increase the number of Common Shares, subject to the RSU Plan, which may be issued pursuant to the RSU Plan;

 

(g) amendments to the definition of “Participant” under the RSU Plan which would have the potential of narrowing, broadening or increasing insider participation;

 

(h) amendments to cancel and reissue Restricted Share Units;

 

 

 

 

(i) amendments to the amendment provisions of the RSU Plan;

 

(j) amendments that extend the term of an RSU;

 

(k) amendments to the participation limits as set out in the RSU Plan; or

 

(l) amendments that would permit RSUs, or any other right or interest of a participant under the RSU Plan, to be assigned or transferred, other than for normal estate settlement purposes.

 

The Board or the Compensation Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory approval, where required, but not subject to Shareholder approval, in its sole discretion make all other amendments to the RSU Plan that are not of the type contemplated above, including, without limitation:

 

(a) amendments of a housekeeping nature;

 

(b) amendments to the vesting provisions of an RSU or the RSU Plan;

 

(c) amendments to the definitions, other than such definitions noted above;

 

(d) amendments to reflect changes to applicable securities laws; and

 

(e) amendments to ensure that the RSUs granted under the Plan will comply with any provisions respecting income tax and other laws in force in any country or jurisdiction of which a participant to whom an RSU has been granted may from time to time be a resident, citizen or otherwise subject to tax therein.

 

Except as otherwise may be expressly provided for under the RSU Plan or pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution, no RSU and no other right or interest of a participant is assignable or transferable, and any such assignment or transfer in violation of the RSU Plan shall be null and void.

 

In the event there is any change to the Common Shares, whether by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification, an appropriate adjustment shall be made by the Compensation Committee in the number of Common Shares available under the RSU Plan and the number of Common Shares subject to any RSUs. If there is an increase in the number of Common Shares outstanding for any reason, other than by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification as described above (for example, as a result of a private placement of Common Shares or the issuance of Common Shares in connection with the acquisition of an asset), there will be no adjustment to the number of Common Shares that a participant will receive under his or her RSU grant letter award and no adjustment to the number of Common Shares available under the RSU Plan

 

If the foregoing adjustment shall result in a fractional Common Share, the fraction shall be disregarded. All such adjustments shall be conclusive, final and binding for all purposes of the RSU Plan.

  

 

 

  

EXHIBIT A

 

Blacklined copy of the proposed amendments to the RSU Plan
(the “RSU Plan Amendments”)

 

See attached.

 

 

 

  

Schedule “C” 

 

DSU PLAN SUMMARY

 

At the Meeting, Shareholders are being asked to approve certain amendments to the DSU Plan, as detailed in the Circular. The following provides a summary of the DSU Plan prior to any such amendments being made.

 

The purpose of this DSU Plan is to strengthen the alignment of interests between the eligible directors and Shareholders by linking a portion of annual director compensation, as determined by the Compensation Committee from time to time, to the future value of the Common Shares. In addition, the DSU Plan advances the interests of the Corporation by motivating, attracting and retaining the directors of the Corporation and its affiliates and encouraging their commitment and performance due to the opportunity offered to them to receive compensation in line with the value of the Common Shares. The DSU Plan is administered by the Board, or, if the Board so delegates, by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has full discretionary authority to administer the DSU Plan, including the authority to interpret and construe any provision of the DSU Plan and to adopt, amend and rescind such rules and regulations for administering the DSU Plan as the Compensation Committee deems necessary to comply with the provisions of the DSU Plan.

 

Subject to certain adjustments, the aggregate maximum number of Common Shares that may be issued under the DSU Plan shall not exceed 2,000,000. The maximum number of Common Shares issuable to any one person, in a 12 month period, pursuant to the DSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation, is 5% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of Common Shares reserved for issuance under DSUs granted to insiders (as a group), at any time, pursuant to the DSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum number of DSUs which may be granted to insiders (as a group), within any one year period, pursuant to the DSU Plan and any other security based compensation arrangements of the Corporation is 10% of the total number of Common Shares then outstanding. The maximum value of DSUs which may be granted to each eligible director who is not also an employee or consultant of the Corporation or any affiliate shall not exceed $150,000 (based on the Market Value of the DSUs) in any financial year.

 

For purposes of determining the number of Common Shares that remain available for issuance under the DSU Plan, the number of Common Shares underlying any grants of DSUs that are surrendered, forfeited, waived, repurchased by the Corporation and/or cancelled shall be added back to the DSU Plan and again be available for future grant, whereas the number of Common Shares underlying any grants of DSUs that are issued shall not be available for future grant.

 

Under the DSU Plan, non-executive directors may receive a grant of DSUs, as determined by the Compensation Committee from time to time. Each DSU entitles the participant to payment in fully-paid Common Shares, issued from the treasury of the Corporation, a cash payment, in an amount equal to the number of DSUs held by the participant on the date the participant ceases to be an eligible director for any reason whatsoever (the “Separation Date”) multiplied by the fair market value of one Common Share on the date the DSU is redeemed, in lieu thereof, or any combination thereof, at the Compensation Committee’s discretion (the “DSU Payment”). DSUs must be retained until the eligible director leaves the Board, at which time the DSUs will be paid out. In the event dividends are declared and paid, additional DSUs may be credited to reflect dividends paid on the Common Shares, at the absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee. In such case, the number of additional DSUs will be equal to the aggregate amount of dividends that would have been paid to the participant if the DSUs in the participant’s account had been Common Shares divided by the Market Value of a Common Share on the date on which dividends were paid by the Corporation.

 

 

 

 

Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, in the event that any Separation Date occurs during, or within 48 hours after a self-imposed blackout period on the trading of securities of the Corporation, settlement of the applicable DSUs will occur on the applicable Redemption Date (as defined in the DSU Plan).

 

Each outstanding DSU held by a participant shall be redeemed by the Corporation on the participant’s Separation Date, less applicable taxes and other source deductions required to be held by the Corporation. Fractional DSUs will be cancelled.

 

The Corporation or its affiliates may take such steps as are considered necessary or appropriate for the withholding of any taxes required to be paid by any law or regulation of any governmental authority whatsoever to withhold in connection with any payment or delivery of Common Shares or cash made under the DSU Plan including, without limitation, the withholding of all or any portion of any payment or the withholding of the issue of Common Shares to be issued under the DSU Plan, until such time as the participant has paid any amount which the Corporation and its affiliates are required to withhold with respect to such taxes. For greater certainty, immediately upon delivery of any Common Shares, the Corporation shall have the right to require that a participant sell a given number of Common Shares to the Corporation or an affiliate of the Corporation sufficient to cover any applicable withholding taxes and any other source deductions to be withheld by the Corporation in connection with payments made in satisfaction of the participant’s vested DSUs.

 

The Board or the Compensation Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory and Shareholder approval, make the following amendments to the DSU Plan:

 

(f) amendments to increase the number of Common Shares which may be issued pursuant to the DSU Plan;

 

(g) amendments to the amendment provisions of the DSU Plan;

 

(h) amendments to cancel and reissue DSUs;

 

(i) amendments that extend the term of a DSU;

 

(j) amendments to the participation limits in the DSU Plan;

 

(k) amendments that would permit DSUs to be transferred other than for normal estate settlement purposes; or

 

(l) materially modify the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan.

 

The Board or the Compensation Committee may, subject to receipt of requisite regulatory approval, where required, in its sole discretion, without Shareholder approval, make all other amendments to the DSU Plan that are not of the type contemplated above, including, without limitation:

 

(m) amendments of a housekeeping nature;

 

(n) amendments to the definitions, other than such definitions noted above;

 

(o) amendments to reflect changes to applicable securities laws; and

 

(p) amendments to ensure that the DSUs granted under the DSU Plan will comply with any provisions respecting income tax and other laws in force in any country or jurisdiction of which a participant to whom a DSU has been granted may from time to time be a resident or otherwise subject to tax therein.

 

Except as otherwise may be expressly provided for under the DSU Plan or pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution, no DSU and no other right or interest of a participant is assignable or transferable, and any such assignment or transfer in violation of the DSU Plan shall be null and void.

 

 

 

 

In the event there is any change to the Common Shares, whether by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification, an appropriate adjustment shall be made by the Compensation Committee with respect to the number of Common Shares available under the DSU Plan and the number of Common Shares subject to or underlying any DSU as the Compensation Committee may determine. However, if there is an increase in the number of Common Shares outstanding for any reason other than by reason of a stock dividend, consolidation, subdivision or reclassification as described above (for example, as a result of a private placement of Common Shares or the issuance of Common Shares in connection with the acquisition of an asset) there will be no adjustment to the number of Common Shares that a participant will receive under his or her DSU grant letter award and no adjustment to the number of Common Shares available under the DSU Plan.

 

If the foregoing adjustment shall result in a fractional Share, the fraction shall be disregarded. All such adjustments shall be conclusive, final and binding for all purposes of the DSU Plan.

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT A

 

Blacklined copy of the proposed amendments to the DSU Plan
(the “DSU Plan Amendments”)

 

See attached.

 

 

 

 

Schedule “D” 

 

BOARD MANDATE

 

See attached.

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.72

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Certificate

 

In connection with the annual and special meeting of the shareholders of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”) to be held on June 12, 2019 (the “Meeting”), the undersigned, Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, hereby provides notice the Corporation is relying on Section 2.20 of National Instrument 54-101 – Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer (“NI 54-101”), and certifies for and on behalf of the Corporation (and not in his personal capacity) that the Corporation: (a) has arranged to have proxy-related materials for the Meeting sent in compliance with the applicable timing requirements in sections 2.9 and 2.12 of NI 54-101; and (b) has arranged to have carried out all of the requirements of NI 54-101 in addition to those described in paragraph (a) above.

 

Dated as of this 14th day of May, 2019.

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

(signed) “Etienne Morin”  
Etienne Morin  
Chief Financial Officer  

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.73

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.Security ClassHolder Account Number------ FoldForm of Proxy - Annual General and Special Meeting to be held on Wednesday, June 12, 2019This Form of Proxy is solicited by and on behalf of Management. Notes to proxy 1. Every holder has the right to appoint some other person or company of their choice, who need not be a holder, to attend and act on their behalf at the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. If you wish to appoint a person or company other than the persons whose names are printe d herein, please insert the name of your chosen proxyholder in the space provided (see reverse). 2. If the securities are registered in the name of more than one owner (for example, joint ownership, trustees, executors, etc.), then all those registered should sign this proxy. If you are voting on behalf of a corporation or another individual you must sign this proxy with signing capacity stated, and you may be required to provide documentation evidencing your power to sign this proxy. 3. This proxy should be signed in the exact manner as the name(s) appear(s) on the proxy.4. If this proxy is not dated, it will be deemed to bear the date on which it is mailed by Management to the holder.5. The securities represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the holder, however, if such a direction is not made in respect of any matter, this proxy will be voted as recommended by Management. 6. The securities represented by this proxy will be voted in favour or withheld from voting or voted against each of the matters described herein, as applicable, in accordance with the instructions of the holder, on any ballot that may be called for and, if the holder has specified a choice with respect to any matter to be acted on, the securities will be voted accordingly. 7. This proxy confers discretionary authority in respect of amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting or other matters that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. 8. This proxy should be read in conjunction with the accompanying documentation provided by Management.Proxies submitted must be received by 9:00 am, Vancouver Time, on Monday, June 10, 2019VOTE USING THE TELEPHONE OR INTERNET 24 HOURS A DAY 7 DAYS A WEEK!------ FoldTo Vote Using the Telephone To Vote Using the Internet• Call the number listed BE LO W from a touch tone telephone.1-866-732-VOTE (8683) Toll Free• Go to the following web site: www.investorvote.com • Smartphone? Scan the QR code to vote now.If you vote by telephone or the Internet, DO NOT mail back this proxy.Voting by mail may be the only method for securities held in the name of a corporation or securities being voted on behalf of another indivi dual. Voting by mail or by Internet are the only methods by which a holder may appoint a person as proxyholder other than the Management nominees named on the reverse of this proxy. Instead of mailing this proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined above to vote this proxy.To vote by telephone or the Internet, you will need to provide your CONTROL NUMBER listed below.CONTROL NUMBER

 

 

 

 

Appointment of Proxyholder I/We being holder(s) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Corporation”) hereby appoint(s): Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, or failing him, Jason Simpson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, or failing him, Christine Gregory, Corporate Secretary of the Corporation,OR Print the name of the person you are appointing if this person is someone other than the Chairman of the Meeting.as my/our proxyholder with full power of substitution and to attend, act and to vote for and on behalf of the shareholder in accordance with the following direction (or if no directions have been given, as the proxyholder sees fit) and all other matters that may properly come before the A nnual General and S pecial Meeting of shareholders of the Corporation to be held at 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, on Wednesday, June 12, 2019 at 9:00 am (Vancouver time) and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS ARE INDICATED BY HIGHLIGHTED TEXT OVER THE BOXES.1. Election of Directors01. Charles JeannesFor Withhold02. Richard HallFor Withhold03. Jason SimpsonFor Withhold04. Jean Robitaille 05. George Albino 06. Tim Haldane07. David Stephens 08. Elizabeth McGregor2. Appointment of AuditorsAppointment of Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, as auditor of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorize the board of directors to fix the remuneration of the auditor.ForWithhold------ Fold3. Amendments to 10% Rolling Stock Option PlanTo consider, and if deemed advisable, to pass an ordinary resolution to approve certain amendments to the Corporation’s stock option plan, as more particularly described in the accompanying management information circular.ForAgainst4. Amendments to Restricted Share Unit PlanForAgainstTo consider, and if deemed advisable, to pass an ordinary resolution to approve certain amendments to the Corporation’s restricted share unit plan, as more particularly described in the accompanying management information circular.5. Amendments to Deferred Share Unit PlanTo consider, and if deemed advisable, to pass an ordinary resolution to approve certain amendments to the Corporation’s deferred share unit plan, as more particularly described in the accompanying management information circular.6. Approval of Early Warrant Exercise ProgramTo consider and if deemed advisable, approve with or without variation, a resolution approving the implementation of the Corporation’s early warrant exercise program as described in the accompanying information circular.ForForAgainstAgainst------ FoldAuthorized Signature(s) - This section must be completed for your instructions to be executed. I/We authorize you to act in accordance with my/our instructions set out above. I/We hereby revoke any proxy previously given with respect to the Meeting. If no voting instructions are indicated above, this Proxy will be voted as recommended by Management.Signature(s) DateAnnual Financial Statements - Mark this box if you would NOT like to receive the Annual Financial Statements and accompanying Management’s Discussion and Analysis by mail. If you are not mailing back your proxy, you may register online to receive the above financial report(s) by mail at www.computershare.com/mailinglist.R D M Q 2 9 4 5 8 5 A R 5

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.74

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

ORLA MINING ANNOUNCES EARLY WARRANT EXERCISE INCENTIVE PROGRAM TO RAISE UP TO $4.2 MILLION

 

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES.

 

VANCOUVER, BC – May 14, 2019 – Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce an Early Warrant Exercise Incentive Program (“Incentive Program”) for the 6,737,500 warrants outstanding having an exercise price of $0.62 and expiring on July 8, 2021 (the “2021 Warrants”). The Incentive Program is designed to encourage the early exercise of the unlisted 2021 Warrants during a 30-day early exercise period (the “Incentive Period”) expected to commence on June 13, 2019.

 

Under the Incentive Program, holders of the 2021 Warrants (the “Warrantholders”) will be entitled to receive one full new warrant (the “Incentive Warrant”) upon the exercise of each 2021 Warrant during the Incentive Period. Each Incentive Warrant will be exercisable into one common share of Orla at a price of $1.65 for a period of 3 years, expiring on June 12, 2022.

 

In the event all 2021 Warrants are exercised during the Incentive Period:

 

· Orla currently expects to receive gross proceeds of $4.2 million on or before July 12, 2019 (the last day of the Incentive Period);

 

· Orla currently expects it will issue 6,737,500 Incentive Warrants with an exercise price of $1.65, and expiring on June 12, 2022.

 

Orla intends to use the proceeds from this program to complete the feasibility study on the Camino Rojo Oxide Project, continue regional exploration efforts and to allow flexibility on the timing of ordering certain long-lead items once a construction decision has been determined for the Camino Rojo Oxide Project. The Incentive Program is intended to provide a cost-effective source of financing for Orla.

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver BC   www.orlamining.com   1

 

 

 

 

 

Each 2021 Warrant that is not exercised during the Incentive Period will remain outstanding and continue to entitle the holder thereof to acquire one common share of Orla at the exercise price of $0.62 until July 8, 2021.

 

The independent members of the board of directors of Orla, who are not Warrantholders, approved the terms of the Incentive Program and the submission of the Incentive Program to disinterested shareholders of the Company for their approval at the upcoming Annual and Special Meeting of the shareholders of the Company to be held on June 12, 2019. The Incentive Program is subject to the receipt of all required regulatory approvals and consents, including approval by a simple majority of the disinterested shareholders (being those shareholders who do not own 2021 Warrants) and the Toronto Stock Exchange. Orla expects to mail the Management Information Circular and proxy material to its shareholders on May 14, 2019.

 

The Incentive Warrants, the underlying securities issuable upon exercise of the Incentive Warrants, the 2021 Warrants and the underlying common shares issued upon exercise of the 2021 Warrants have not been, and will not be, registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "U.S. Securities Act") or any U.S. state securities laws, and may not be exercised, as applicable, or offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, United States persons absent registration or any applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable U.S. state securities laws. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in the United States, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

 

Orla has determined that while the Incentive Program may be a related party transaction pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Special Transactions (“MI 61-101”), Orla is not required to obtain a formal valuation under subsection 5.4(1) of MI 61-101 or minority approval under subsection 5.7(1)(a) of MI 61-101 because pursuant to the exemptions set forth in MI 61-101, neither the fair market value nor the fair market value of the consideration paid for the 2021 Warrants exceeds 25% of the Company’s market capitalization.

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver BC   www.orlamining.com   2

 

 

 

 

 

Advisor

 

GMP Securities L.P. is acting as financial advisor to Orla with respect to the transaction.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 200,000 hectares. The Feasibility Study on the Camino Rojo Oxide Project is expected to be completed by mid-year 2019. The Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report for Camino Rojo dated March 11, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company's profile. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the "Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits" dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States federal and state securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the terms, timing and expected amount of proceeds the be received as part of the Incentive Program, the timing of completion of the Camino Rojo Oxide Project Feasibility Study and the timing of a construction decision. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts but which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer

Email: info@orlamining.com

Tel: 604-564-1852

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 202 – 595 Howe Street, Vancouver BC   www.orlamining.com   3

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.75

 

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

 

Presented in Canadian dollars

 

 

NOTICE TO READER

 

 

Pursuant to National Instrument 51-102, subsection 4.3(3)(a), we advise that the Company’s auditor has not performed a review of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    March 31     December 31  
As at   2019     2018  
ASSETS                
Current assets                
Cash   $ 9,656     $ 16,686  
Accounts receivable     224       385  
Prepaid expenses     163       206  
      10,043       17,277  
Restricted cash and reclamation deposits     530       205  
Value added taxes recoverable     1,049       849  
Equipment (note 6)     297       344  
Exploration and evaluation assets (note 5)     166,648       169,282  
TOTAL ASSETS   $ 178,567     $ 187,957  
                 
LIABILITIES                
Current liabilities                
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 7)   $ 2,596     $ 3,659  
      2,596       3,659  
Newmont loan (note 8)     9,021       6,103  
Site closure provisions     734       745  
TOTAL LIABILITIES     12,351       10,507  
                 
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                
Share capital     201,291       201,077  
Reserves     27,063       25,960  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss     2,286       4,797  
Accumulated deficit     (64,424 )     (54,384 )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY     166,216       177,450  
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 178,567     $ 187,957  

 

Nature and continuance of operations (note 1)

 

Authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors on May 9, 2019.

 

  /s/ David Stephens     /s/ Jason Simpson
David Stephens, Director   Jason Simpson, Director

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

  Page 3  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Loss

(Thousands of Canadian dollars, except per-share amounts)

 

    Three months ended March 31  
    2019     2018  
          restated note 4  
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENSES (note 5)                
Assays and analysis   $ 111     $ 182  
Drilling     683       311  
Geological     847       1,114  
Engineering     909       57  
Environmental     192       31  
Community and government     245       312  
Land and water use, claims and concessions     3,067       1,817  
Project management     44       43  
Project review     56       21  
Site activities     777       803  
Site administration     572       582  
      7,503       5,273  
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES                
Office and administrative     217       108  
Professional fees     125       136  
Regulatory and transfer agent     41       40  
Salaries and benefits     550       234  
      933       518  
                 
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)                
Depreciation     39       36  
Share based payments (note 10)     1,253       796  
Interest income     (62 )     (86 )
Change in fair value of Newmont loan (note 8)     357        
Foreign exchange loss (gain)     13       (6 )
Other     4       65  
      1,604       805  
                 
LOSS FOR THE PERIOD   $ 10,040     $ 6,596  
                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions)     179.5       169.6  
                 
Loss per share - basic and diluted   $ 0.06     $ 0.04  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

  Page 4  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(Thousands of Canadian dollars, except per-share amounts)

 

    Three months ended March 31  
    2019     2018  
          restated, note 4  
LOSS FOR THE PERIOD   $ 10,040     $ 6,596  
                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME)                
Items that may in future periods be reclassified to profit or loss                
Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations     2,511       (6,064 )
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS   $ 12,551     $ 532  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

  Page 5  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    Three months ended March 31  
Cash flows provided by (used in):   2019     2018  
          restated, note 4  
OPERATING ACTIVITIES                
Net income (loss) for the period   $ (10,040 )   $ (6,596 )
Adjustments for items not affecting cash:                
Depreciation     39       36  
Share based compensation     1,253       796  
Loan proceeds received in excess of fair value, credited to exploration expense (note 8)     (950 )      
Change in fair value of Newmont loan     357       62  
Changes in non-cash working capital:                
Accounts receivable     152       (15 )
Prepaid expenses     41       181  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     (1,047 )     547  
Cash used in operating activities     (10,195 )     (4,991 )
                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES                
Proceeds on issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs           29,035  
Advances received on the Newmont loan (note 8)     3,556       3,917  
Cash provided by financing activities     3,556       32,952  
                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES                
Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets           (1,819 )
Purchase of equipment           (20 )
Restricted cash and reclamation deposits funded     (328 )      
Value added taxes paid, not immediately recoverable     (206 )     (64 )
Cash used in investing activities     (534 )     (1,903 )
                 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash     143       203  
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash     (7,030 )     26,261  
Cash, beginning of year     16,686       6,142  
Cash, end of period   $ 9,656     $ 32,403  
                 
Cash consist of:                
Bank current accounts and cash on hand   $ 9,527     $ 32,380  
Short term highly liquid investments     129       23  
Cash   $ 9,656     $ 32,403  

 

Supplemental cash flow information (note 12)

 

  Page 6  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    Common shares   Reserves              
    Number
of
shares (thousands)
  Amount   Warrants   Options   RSUs, DSUs, and
Bonus
shares
  Total   Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
  Retained earnings   Total  
Balances at January 1, 2018, as previously stated     160,441   $ 174,436   $ 14,114   $ 4,944   $ 118   $ 19,176   $ (8,840 ) $ (14,984 ) $ 169,788  
Effect of change in accounting policy                             183     (9,487 )   (9,304 )
Balances at January 1, 2018, restated     160,441     174,436   $ 14,114   $ 4,944   $ 118   $ 19,176   $ (8,657 ) $ (24,471 ) $ 160,484  
Private placement     17,581     27,803     2,964             2,964             30,767  
Shares issued for debt settlement     148     207                             207  
Share issue costs         (1,777 )                           (1,777 )
Exercise of warrants     388     64     (18 )           (18 )           46  
Share based payments                 741     55     796             796  
Loss for the period                                 (6,596 )   (6,596 )
Other comprehensive income                             6,064         6,064  
Balance at March 31, 2018     178,558   $ 200,733   $ 17,060   $ 5,685   $ 173   $ 22,918   $ (2,593 ) $ (31,067 ) $ 189,991  
                                                         
Balance at January 1, 2019     179,315   $ 201,077   $ 17,026   $ 8,020   $ 914   $ 25,960   $ 4,797   $ (54,384 ) $ 177,450  
Shares issued for Monitor agreement     59     64                             64  
Redemptions of RSUs     120     150             (150 )   (150 )            
Share based payments                 785     468     1,253             1,253  
Loss for the year                                 (10,040 )   (10,040 )
Other comprehensive loss                             (2,511 )       (2,511 )
Balance at March 31, 2019     179,494   $ 201,291   $ 17,026   $ 8,805   $ 1,232   $ 27,063   $ 2,286   $ (64,424 ) $ 166,216  

 

For details of the change in accounting policy during 2018, refer to note 3 of the audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

  Page 7  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION AND CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS

 

Orla Mining Ltd. was incorporated in Alberta in 2007 and has been continued as a federal company under the Canada Business Corporations Act since 2016. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. The registered office of the Company is located at Suite 202, 595 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada.

 

The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties, and holds two material gold projects – the Camino Rojo gold and silver project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama.

 

These unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. Different bases of measurement may be appropriate if the Company is not expected to continue operations for the foreseeable future. As at March 31, 2019, the Company had not advanced any of its properties to commercial production and was not able to fund day-to-day activities through operations. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon successful results from our mineral exploration activities and our ability to attain profitable operations and generate cash or raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations. We expect to fund operating costs of the Company over the next twelve months with cash on hand and with further equity or debt financings.

 

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION

 

These condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 «Interim Financial Reporting» and do not include all the information required for full annual financial statements.

 

The Board of Directors approved these condensed interim consolidated financial statements for issue, on May 9, 2019.

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

These condensed interim consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.

 

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

We applied the same accounting policies in these condensed interim consolidated financial statements as those applied in the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

In preparing these condensed interim consolidated financial statements, the significant judgements we made in applying the Company’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those that applied to the annual consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

You should read these condensed interim consolidated financial statements in conjunction with the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

  Page 8  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

4. CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES DURING THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 WHICH EFFECT THE COMPARATIVE FIGURES

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we changed certain of our accounting policies. Consequently, we restated the figures presented for the comparative period (namely, the three months ended March 31, 2018). A discussion of the quantitative changes respecting the three months ended March 31, 2018 are presented in this note below. For a qualitative discussion of these changes in accounting policies we refer you to note 3(a) of our annual audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

(i) Exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) expenditures

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to capitalize exploration and evaluation expenditures. In preparation for the possible construction and operation of our mineral projects, we updated our policy with respect to such expenditures. The new policy is to expense such expenditures as incurred.

 

(ii) Site-related administrative costs

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to include site-related administrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel within “general and administrative expenses”. The new policy is to present these costs within exploration expenditures.

 

(iii) Site-related VAT recoverable amounts

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to include site-related value-added taxes (“VAT”) recoverable, such as Mexican IVA, within “exploration and evaluation assets”. The new policy is to present these amounts as receivables, with appropriate current and long term classification. The IVA paid upon the initial acquisition of the Camino Rojo Project continues to be carried as part of acquisition costs.

 

(iv) Corporate administrative costs

 

As a result of the reclassifications in note (ii) above, corporate “rent”, “public and community relations”, and “travel” were not material. Consequently, we grouped them within “office and administrative” expenses.

 

  Page 9  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(v) Effects of these changes in accounting policies

 

The effects of the above changes on the results of operations and cash flows are presented here:

 

    Three months
ended
March 31, 2018
 
Effect on income statement of changes in accounting policies        
Exploration and evaluation expenses (“E&E”):        
As originally presented   $ 5  
E&E charged to expenses, note (i)     5,268  
As restated   $ 5,273  
         
Office and administration expenses:        
As originally presented   $ 167  
Site-related adminstrative costs reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (114 )
Corporate public and community relations reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     24  
Corporate rent reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     9  
Corporate travel reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     22  
As restated   $ 108  
         
Professional fees:        
As originally presented   $ 203  
Site-related professional fees reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (67 )
As restated   $ 136  
         
Public and community relations:        
As originally presented   $ 125  
Site-related public and community relations costs reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (101 )
Corporate public and community relations reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (24 )
As restated   $  
         
Rent:        
As originally presented   $ 24  
Site-related rent reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (15 )
Corporate rent reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (9 )
As restated   $  
         
Salaries and benefits:        
Originally presented as management and directors’ fees   $ 219  
Originally presented as salaries and benefits     181  
As originally presented, combined     400  
Site-related salaries and benefits reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (166 )
As restated   $ 234  
         
Travel:        
As originally presented   $ 61  
Site-related travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (39 )
Corporate travel reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (22 )
As restated   $  

 

  Page 10  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

      Three months
ended
March 31, 2018
 
Effect on cash flow statement of changes in accounting policies        
         
Cash used in operating activities:        
As originally presented   $ (225 )
Site-related adminstrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     502  
E&E charged to expenses, note (i)     (5,298 )
Depreciation included in E&E     30  
As restated   $ (4,991 )
         
Cash used in investing activities:        
As originally presented   $ (6,670 )
Site-related adminstrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (502 )
E&E charged to expenses, excluding depreciation of $30, note (i)     5,269  
As restated   $ (1,903 )

 

There were no changes in cash flows provided by financing activities.

 

5. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION

 

The Company’s exploration and evaluation projects consist of the Camino Rojo Project, the Cerro Quema Project, and the Monitor Gold Project.

 

(a) Camino Rojo Project

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Goldcorp Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine and consists of eight concessions covering in aggregate 205,936 hectares. As currently understood, Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with exploration potential.

 

In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project, a gold and silver oxide heap leach project located in Zacatecas State, Mexico, from Goldcorp Inc. (a predecessor company to Newmont) by:

 

· issuing 31,860,141 common shares of Orla,

 

· granting a 2% net smelter royalty (the “Royalty”) on the sale of all metal production from Camino Rojo, and

 

· paying certain obligations, including Mexican value-added taxes, of approximately $4,923,000.

 

In addition, the Company and Goldcorp (now, Newmont) entered into an option agreement regarding the potential development of sulphide operations at Camino Rojo. Pursuant to the option agreement, Newmont will, subject to the applicable sulphide project meeting certain thresholds, have an option to acquire a 60% or 70% interest in the applicable sulphide project. The Royalty excludes revenue on the sale of metals produced from a sulphide project where Newmont has exercised its Sulphide Option.

 

  Page 11  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

We maintain a right of first refusal on the sale if Newmont elects to sell the Royalty, in whole or in part.

 

(b) Cerro Quema Project

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open-pit mine with process by heap leaching.

 

In December 2016, we acquired 100% of the Cerro Quema Project by acquiring Pershimco Resources Inc. through the issuance of a combination of Orla common shares and warrants, and the assumption of Pershimco’s long term debt, which we subsequently paid off. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the current mineral resource areas, proposed mine development areas, and priority drill target areas.

 

The original 20-year terms for these concessions expired in February and March of 2017. The Company has applied for the prescribed ten year extension to these concessions as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. In March 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications had been received and that exploration work could continue while the Company awaits renewal of the concessions. As of the date of these financial statements, final concession renewals have not been received. However, we continue to receive ongoing drilling, water use, environmental and other permits, and have paid concession taxes, in the normal course.

 

(c) Monitor Gold Project

 

The Monitor Gold Project consists of three separate option agreements consisting of 422 claims covering 3,416 hectares in Nye County, Nevada, USA.

 

To maintain the options, minimum payments and work commitments are required for each year to 2038. In 2019, these consist of US$50,000 in share issuances (completed in January 2019), US$20,000 in advance royalty payments (completed in March 2019)), and US$30,000 in work commitments. For 2020, these payments and work commitments consist of US$40,000 in advance royalty payments, and US$75,000 in work commitments.

 

  Page 12  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(d) Exploration and evaluation assets

 

Capitalized initial acquisition costs of our active mineral properties are as follows:

 

    Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Other     Total  
Acquisition costs at historical rates                              
At December 31, 2018   $ 54,258     $ 109,474     $ 407     $     $ 164,139  
Additions                              
At March 31, 2019   $ 54,258     $ 109,474     $ 407     $     $ 164,139  
                                         
Accumulated foreign exchange on translation                                        
At December 31, 2018   $ 2,145     $ 2,976     $ 22     $     $ 5,143  
Due to changes in exchange rates     (325 )     (2,300 )     (9 )           (2,634 )
At March 31, 2019   $ 1,820     $ 676     $ 13     $     $ 2,509  
                                         
Acquisition costs                                        
At December 31, 2018   $ 56,403     $ 112,450     $ 429     $     $ 169,282  
At March 31, 2019   $ 56,078     $ 110,150     $ 420     $     $ 166,648  

 

(e) Exploration and evaluation expense

 

Three months ended March 31, 2019   Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 80     $ 31     $     $     $ 111  
Drilling     683                         683  
Geological     369       369       5             743  
Engineering     909                         909  
Environmental     192                         192  
Community and government     118       127                   245  
Land, water use, and claims     2,963       2       102             3,067  
Project management     44                         44  
Project review                       106       106  
Site activities     309       468                   777  
Site administration     217       409                   626  
    $ 5,884     $ 1,406     $ 107     $ 106     $ 7,503  

 

  Page 13  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Three months ended March 31, 2018 
(restated)
  Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 91     $ 91     $     $     $ 182  
Drilling           311                   311  
Geological and geophysical     210       880       24             1,114  
Engineering     57                         57  
Environmental     31                         31  
Community and government     36       276                   312  
Land, water use, and claims     1,817                         1,817  
Project management     43                         43  
Project review                       21       21  
Site activities     331       472                   803  
Site administration     59       523                   582  
    $ 2,675     $ 2,553     $ 24     $ 21     $ 5,273  

 

6. EQUIPMENT

 

    Equipment     Office
equipment
    Computer
equipment
    Vehicles     Total  
Cost                                        
At December 31, 2018   $ 427     $ 44     $ 185     $ 29     $ 685  
Additions (disposals)     5       2       (11 )           (4 )
Effect of movements in exchange rates     (6 )     (1 )     (2 )     (1 )     (10 )
At March 31, 2019   $ 426     $ 45     $ 172     $ 28     $ 671  
                                         
Accumulated depreciation                                        
At December 31, 2018   $ 207     $ 17     $ 101     $ 16     $ 341  
Charged in the year     23       1       12       3       39  
Effect of movements in exchange rates     (4 )           (2 )           (6 )
At March 31, 2019   $ 226     $ 18     $ 111     $ 19     $ 374  
                                         
Net book value                                        
At December 31, 2018   $ 220     $ 27     $ 84     $ 13     $ 344  
At March 31, 2019   $ 200     $ 27     $ 61     $ 9     $ 297  

 

  Page 14  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

7. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

 

    March 31,
2019
    December 31,
2018
 
Trade payables   $ 755     $ 1,341  
Payroll related liabilities     285       402  
Accrued liabilities     1,556       1,916  
    $ 2,596     $ 3,659  

 

8. NEWMONT LOAN

 

    Three months ended March 31, 2019  
    Mexican
pesos
 (thousands)
    Mexican
pesos
(thousands)
    Canadian
dollars
(thousands)
 
    Undiscounted     Discounted        
At December 31, 2018     121,865       87,917     $ 6,103  
Advances received     51,357       37,634       3,569  
Advances received in excess of fair value, credited to exploration expense                 (963 )
Change in fair value during the period           5,152       357  
Foreign exchange                 (45 )
At March 31, 2019     173,222       130,703     $ 9,021  

 

9. SHARE CAPITAL

 

Issued share capital

 

On January 15, 2019, the Company issued 120,000 common shares of the Company in settlement of restricted share units which had vested.

 

On January 28, 2019, the Company issued 58,895 common shares pursuant to the Monitor agreements (note 5(c)).

 

  Page 15  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

10. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

 

The Company has four different forms of share-based payments for eligible recipients – stock options, restricted share units (“RSUs”), deferred share units (“DSUs”), and bonus shares.

 

Share based payments expense   Three months ended
March 31
 
    2019     2018  
Stock options (note 10(a))   $ 785     $ 741  
Restricted share units (note 10(b))     50        
Deferred share units (note 10(c))     254        
Bonus shares (note 10(d))     164       55  
Share based payments expense   $ 1,253     $ 796  

 

(a) Stock options

 

Stock options outstanding   Number     Weighted
average
exercise price
 
As at January 1, 2018     6,276,748     $ 1.13  
Granted     3,841,505       1.26  
Exercised     (657,000 )     0.21  
Expired or cancelled     (337,248 )     1.77  
As at December 31, 2018     9,124,005       1.23  
Granted     1,978,660       1.06  
As at March 31, 2019     11,102,665     $ 1.20  
                 
Vested, December 31, 2018     5,426,005     $ 1.17  
Vested, March 31, 2019     6,085,558     $ 1.16  

 

The options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2019 had an aggregate grant date fair value of $932,000 which was determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

· expected volatility 50%, expected life 5 years, Canadian dollar risk free interest rate 1.5%, dividends nil.

 

The options granted during the year ended December 31, 2018 had an aggregate grant date fair value of $2,202,000 which was determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

· expected volatility 50%, expected life 5 years, Canadian dollar risk free interest rate 2.1%, dividends nil.

 

  Page 16  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”)

 

RSUs outstanding:         Number vesting or settling in the year  
    Number     2019     2020     2021     2022  
Outstanding, January 1, 2019     368,000       202,666       82,667       82,667        
Settled     (120,000 )     (120,000 )                  
Awarded     849,639             283,214       283,214       283,211  
Outstanding, March 31, 2019     1,097,639       82,666       365,881       365,881       283,211  

 

On January 15, 2019, we issued 120,000 common shares in settlement of 120,000 RSU’s which had vested.

 

(c) Deferred Share Units (“DSUs”)

 

DSUs outstanding:      
    Number  
Outstanding, January 1, 2018      
Awarded     180,000  
Outstanding, December 31, 2018     180,000  
Awarded     240,566  
Outstanding, March 31, 2019     420,566  

 

(d) Bonus shares

 

During 2017, the Board of Directors awarded 500,000 common shares to the non-executive Chairman of the Company as bonus shares. The bonus shares are subject to a vesting period from June 19, 2017 to June 18, 2020 (the “Eligibility Period”). If the non-executive Chairman ceases to be the director of the Company before the Eligibility Period ends, the bonus shares will be forfeited. The bonus shares will become issuable (1) after the Eligibility Period on the date that the non-executive Chairman ceases to act as a director of the Company, or (2) upon a change of control of the Company.

 

We estimated the fair value of the bonus shares ($1.31 each) based on the market price of the common shares at the date of Board approval. Accordingly, the amount of $655,000 is being recognized on a straight-line basis over the Eligibility Period.

 

On November 13, 2018, the Board of Directors awarded 1,000,000 bonus shares to the incoming Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The bonus shares vest in four tranches of 250,000 bonus shares each, issuable upon the achievement of certain share price thresholds particular to each tranche. We estimated that these market condition tranches will vest in various periods from December 2019 to March 2022, and consequently, the award date fair value ($537,000, or $0.537 per bonus share) is being recognized over these periods.

 

  Page 17  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company’s related parties include:

 

Related party Nature of the relationship
Key management personnel (“KMP”) Key management personnel are the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and members of the Board of Directors of the Company.
   
Quantum Advisory Partners LLP (“Quantum”)

Registered limited liability partnership, of which Paul Robertson, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is an incorporated partner.

 

The Company did not employ Mr. Robertson directly, and he provided services as Chief Financial Officer pursuant to a professional services agreement with Quantum.

 

Besides providing the services of Mr. Robertson, Quantum provided bookkeeping and accounting services to the Company at agreed monthly quantities and rates, with additional charges for excess usage. Pricing is at normal commercial terms, with prices negotiated annually.

 

Quantum ceased to be a related party on April 30, 2018.

 

(a) Key Management Personnel

 

Compensation to key management personnel was as follows:

 

    Three months ended March 31  
    2019     2018  
Short term incentive plans                
Salaries, management services, and consulting fees   $ 231     $ 176  
Directors’ fees     41       43  
      272       219  
Share based payments     1,009       615  
Total   $ 1,281     $ 834  

 

The Company is committed to making severance payments amounting to approximately $3,300,000 (December 31, 2018 – $3,225,000) to certain officers and management in the event of a change in control. As the likelihood of these events taking place is not determinable, we have not reflected such amounts in these financial statements.

 

  Page 18  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Transactions

 

The following related party transactions are included in compensation to key management personnel, above.

 

    Three months ended March 31  
    2019     2018  
Quantum Advisory Partners LLP – management services   $     $ 52  

 

The Company had no other material transactions with related parties other than key management personnel during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

(c) Outstanding balances at the Reporting Date

 

At March 31, 2019, estimated accrued short term incentive compensation totaled $500,000 and was included in accrued liabilities (December 31, 2017 – $324,000). Such amounts are not legally enforceable liabilities until actually resolved by the Board to be paid.

 

Subsequent to the reporting period, $292,000 in respect of these amounts was paid to KMPs.

 

12. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

The non-cash investing and financing activities of the Company include the following:

 

    Three months ended March 31  
    2019     2018  
Shares issued for debt settlement   $     $ 207  
Reclassification from reserves to share capital upon exercise of options           18  
                 

 

13. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

(a) Reportable segments

 

The operating segments of the Company are based on the reports which are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in making strategic resource allocation decisions. These operating segments are the Panamanian projects, the Mexican projects, and the corporate office. The projects are each managed by a dedicated General Manager and management team. Additionally, the corporate office oversees the plans and activities of early stage exploration projects, such as the Monitor Gold project.

 

None of these segments as yet generate revenue from external customers, and each of the projects are focused on the exploration and evaluation of mineral properties.

 

  Page 19  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Geographic segments

 

We conduct our activities in four geographic areas: Mexico, Panama, the United States, and Canada.

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At March 31, 2019                                        
Restricted cash   $     $ 530     $     $     $ 530  
Equipment     188       92             17       297  
Exploration and evaluation assets     56,078       110,150       420             166,648  
                                         
At December 31, 2018                                        
Restricted cash   $     $ 205     $     $     $ 205  
Equipment     193       117             34       344  
Exploration and evaluation assets     56,403       112,450       429             169,282  

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
Three months ended March 31, 2019                                        
Exploration expense   $ 5,884     $ 1,406     $ 107     $ 106     $ 7,503  
                                         
Three months ended March 31, 2018                                        
Exploration expense   $ 2,675     $ 2,553     $ 24     $ 21     $ 5,273  

 

14. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

 

Our objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the exploration and evaluation of our mineral properties and to maintain a flexible capital structure. In the management of capital, we include long term loans and share capital.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, we included long term loans in our policy for capital management, as they did not exist in prior years. Other than that inclusion, there were no changes to our policy for capital management during the year.

 

We manage our capital structure and make adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the Company’s capital structure, we may issue new shares, acquire or dispose of assets, or adjust the amount of cash and short-term investments. In order to maximize ongoing development efforts, we do not currently pay dividends. The Company and its subsidiaries are not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.

 

Loan advances from Newmont are used within a few weeks of receipt to pay land holding costs pursuant to the loan agreement governing these advances.

 

Our investment policy is to invest the Company’s excess cash in low risk financial instruments such as term deposits and higher yield savings accounts with major Canadian banks. By using this strategy, the Company preserves its cash resources and is able to marginally increase these resources through the yields on these investments. Our financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks, which include currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk.

 

  Page 20  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Our ability to carry out our long range strategic objectives in future years depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing exploration and development activities.

 

15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

(a) Fair value hierarchy

 

To provide an indication of the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, we classify our financial instruments into the three levels prescribed by the accounting standards.

 

Level 1 The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded equity securities) is based on quoted (unadjusted) market prices as at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Company is the closing trading price on the reporting date. Such instruments are included in Level 1.

 

Level 2 The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, we include that instrument in Level 2.

 

Level 3 If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3. We have no financial assets or liabilities included in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

 

At March 31, 2019, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying
value
    Quoted
prices in
active market
for identical
assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                            
Cash   FVTPL   $ 9,656     $ 9,656     $     $         —     $ 9,656  
Restricted cash   FVTPL     329       329                   329  
Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     153             153             153  
Reclamation deposits   Amortized cost     200             200             200  
        $ 10,338       9,985     $ 353     $     $ 10,338  
                                             
Financial liabilities                                            
Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 734     $     $ 734     $     $ 734  
Newmont loan   FVTPL     9,021             9,021             9,021  
        $ 9,755     $     $ 9,755     $     $ 9,755  

 

  Page 21  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

At December 31, 2018, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying
value
    Quoted
prices in
active market
for identical
assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                            
Cash   FVTPL   $ 16,686     $ 16,686     $     $         —     $ 16,686  
Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     385             385             385  
Reclamation deposits   Amortized cost     205             205             205  
        $ 17,276       16,686     $ 590     $     $ 17,276  
                                             
Financial liabilities                                            
Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 1,341     $     $ 1,341     $     $ 1,341  
Newmont loan   FVTPL     6,103             6,103             6,103  
        $ 7,444     $     $ 7,444     $     $ 7,444  

 

Our policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the reporting period. As at March 31, 2019, we had no financial assets or financial liabilities which we measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

 

(b) Financial Risk Management

 

(i) Credit risk

 

Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to financial instruments fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company’s exposure to credit risk is limited to cash and reclamation deposits.

 

Our cash is held at large Canadian financial institutions in interest bearing accounts. Our reclamation deposits are held with large banks in the countries where they have been lodged. We believe that the credit risk related to our cash and reclamation deposits is negligible.

 

The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk is the carrying value of cash and reclamation deposits.

 

(ii) Liquidity risk

 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with its financial liabilities.

 

  Page 22  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

At March 31, 2019, our financial liabilities had expected maturity dates as follows:

 

    Fair value     Less than
3 months
    Between
3 months and
1 year
    Between
1 year and
3 years
    More than
3 years
 
Financial liabilities                                        
Trade payables   $ 734     $ 734     $     $     $  
Newmont loan     9,021                   9,021        
    $ 9,755     $ 734     $     $ 9,021     $  

 

We manage liquidity by anticipating and maintaining adequate cash balances to meet liabilities as they become due. We review cash forecasts on a regular basis to determine whether the Company will have sufficient cash to meet future working capital needs.

 

(iii) Market risk

 

Market risk is the risk that the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments will fluctuate due to changes in market prices. The significant market risks to which the Company’s financial instruments are exposed are currency risk and interest rate risk.

 

(A) Currency risk

 

The Company is exposed to currency risk to the extent that monetary assets and liabilities held by the Company are not denominated in Canadian dollars. We have not entered into any foreign currency contracts or similar arrangements to mitigate this risk.

 

Our financial instruments are held in Canadian dollars (“CAD”), US dollars (“USD”), and Mexican pesos (“MXN”). As such, our US- and Mexican-currency accounts and balances are subject to fluctuation against the Canadian dollar. Our financial instruments were denominated in the following currencies as at March 31, 2019:

 

    Canadian
dollars
(thousands)
    US dollars
(thousands)
    Mexican pesos
(thousands)
 
Cash   $ 8,148     $ 1,012     $ 2,255  
Restricted cash           246        
Accounts receivable           100       274  
Reclamation deposits           150        
Trade payables     (596 )     (30 )     (1,434 )
Newmont loan                 (130,703 )
Total foreign currency     7,552       1,478       (129,608 )
Exchange rate     1.0000       1.3363       0.0690  
Equivalent Canadian dollars   $ 7,552     $ 1,975     $ (8,946 )

 

Based on the above net exposures as at March 31, 2019, and assuming that all other variables remain constant:

 

· a 10% appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would decrease loss by $54,000 and
· a 10% appreciation of the Mexican peso against the Canadian dollar would increase loss by $1,434,000.

 

  Page 23  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(B) Interest rate risk

 

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. Our cash and our reclamation deposits are held mainly in saving accounts and term deposits and therefore there is currently minimal interest rate risk. Because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments, fluctuations in market rates do not have a significant impact on estimated fair values compared to carrying value.

 

The Company’s interest rate risk arises principally from the changes in interest rates related to term deposits where our cash and reclamation deposits are held. A one percent change increase in interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $32,000 to the Company’s loss for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

 

The fair value of the Newmont loan is subject to interest rate risk as it is marked to market at each reporting date. The fair value would have decreased by $155,000 had interest rates been 1% higher.

 

  Page 24  

 

Exhibit 99.76

 

 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

 

Three months ended March 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

1. Overview

 

Orla Mining Ltd. is a mineral exploration and development company which trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol OLA. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. Refer to page 21 of this document for a list of abbreviations used.

 

Our corporate strategy is to acquire and develop mineral exploration properties where our expertise can substantially increase shareholder value. We have two material gold projects with near-term production potential based on open pit mining and heap leaching – the Camino Rojo gold and silver project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama.

 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2019 (the “financial statements”), and the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 which were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). You can find additional information regarding the Company, including our Annual Information Form, on SEDAR under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com.

 

All monetary amounts herein are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.

 

This MD&A is current as of May 9, 2019.

 

Hans Smit, P. Geo, our Chief Operating Officer, is the Qualified Person, as the term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). He has reviewed and approved the technical information disclosed in this MD&A.

 

With respect to the preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) on the Camino Rojo project, we caution you that PEAs are preliminary in nature and include the use of inferred mineral resources, which are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is no certainty that preliminary economic assessment results will be realized. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

 

2. Highlights

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and to the date of this MD&A, the Company:

 

· filed a final short form base shelf prospectus for offerings of up to $300 million, and

· continued its exploration and evaluation activities at Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema.

 

3. Discussion of Operations

 

A. Camino Rojo, Mexico

 

Project Description and History

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Newmont Goldcorp Corporation’s (“Newmont”) Peñasquito Mine and consists of eight concessions covering in aggregate approximately 206,000 hectares. In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc. (a predecessor company to Newmont). As currently understood, Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with exploration potential.

 

  Page 2  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Canplats Resources Corporation (“Canplats”) initially discovered gold-silver mineralization at Camino Rojo in 2007, and they subsequently completed 39,725 metres of drilling, largely delineating the shallow oxide mineralization. Canplats also carried out metallurgical studies prior to being acquired by Goldcorp in 2010. Goldcorp then completed more than 250,000 metres of drilling, conducted airborne and ground geophysical surveys, did extensive geological and mineralogical investigations, and conducted numerous metallurgical studies, which included detailed mineralogical studies, column leach tests on oxide material, size fraction analysis, variability test work and sulphide flotation studies.

 

The Ejido San Tiburcio holds the surface rights over the main area of known mineralization. Exploration has been carried out under the authority of agreements between the project operators and the Ejido San Tiburcio. There is a temporary occupation agreement in place with the Ejido San Tiburcio, with the right to expropriate, covering all the area of the mineral resource and area of potential development described in the Camino Rojo Report. Other temporary occupation agreements allow surface access for exploration activities in various other parts of the large property. The Company has water rights in the area of the proposed development.

 

The Company has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. However, if sulphide projects are defined through one or more positive pre-feasibility studies with certain development scenarios meeting certain criteria, Newmont has an option to enter into a joint venture with Orla for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of such a sulphide project. If Newmont exercises its option, Orla’s share of the costs to develop the project might be carried to production by Newmont. Orla has a right of first refusal on a sale if Newmont elects to sell its portion of the sulphide project, in whole or in part. The Camino Rojo Asset Purchase Agreement was filed on SEDAR on June 28, 2017. Details of the development scenarios and joint venture structures are available in our news release dated November 7, 2017, which is available here.

 

2018 Activities

 

In May 2018, we announced a Mineral Resource estimate for the Camino Rojo deposit and the results of a PEA for the development of an open pit project with heap leaching process to recover the gold and silver mineralization, both prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

 

Summary of the Mineral Resource at Camino Rojo:

 

M&I Resource   K tonnes     Au (g/t)     Ag (g/t)     Au (Koz)     Ag (Koz)  
Leach – Oxide/Trans     100,839       0.734       12.67       2,381       41,091  
Mill – Sulphide     254,069       0.889       7.50       7,265       61,286  
Total M&I     354,908       0.845       8.97       9,646       102,377  
Total Inferred     65,200       0.867       7.73       1,817       16,208  

 

M&I Resource   K tonnes     Lead (%)     Zinc (%)     Lead (Mlbs)     Zinc (Mlbs)  
Leach – Oxide/Trans     100,389       0.21       0.37       455.8       814.8  
Mill – Sulphide     254,069       0.07       0.26       402       1,458.3  
Total M&I     354,908       0.11       0.29       875.8       2,273.2  
Total Inferred     65,200       0.05       0.23       75.2       336.8  

 

Notes:

 

(1) The mineral resource is effective as of April 27, 2018.

(2) Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding.

(3) Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

(4) Mineral resources for leach material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold and $20/oz silver.

(5) Mineral resources for mill material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold, $20/oz silver, $1.05/lb lead, and $1.25/lb zinc.

(6) Mineral resources are based on NSR cut-off grades of $5.06/t for leach material and $13.72/t for mill material.

(7) The mineral resource estimate assumes that the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto land held by the owner of the adjacent property. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the owner of the adjacent property.

 

  Page 3  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

In July 2018, we filed the PEA on the Camino Rojo Project. The PEA was based on near-surface oxide and partly oxidized (transitional) material within the overall mineral resource that can be processed by heap leaching. All mineral resources and the proposed open pit in the PEA are within our mineral concessions.

 

Highlights of the PEA were as follows:

 

Production rate 18,000 tonnes
Life of mine   6.6 years
Total material to the leach pad 42.5 million tonnes
Average grade – gold and silver 0.71 g/t gold, and 13.56 g/t silver
Contained ounces 966,000 oz gold, and 18,517,000 oz silver
Average recovery 67% gold, and 15% silver
Average annual gold production 97,500 ounces
Strip ratio 0.58
Initial capex US$125 million
Average life of mine production costs US$8.02 per tonne processed
Total By-Product Cash Cost1 US$499/oz Au
All-In Sustaining Cost1 US$555/oz Au
Pre-tax Net Present Value (“NPV”) (using 5% discount rate) US$231 million
Pre-tax Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) 38.1%
After-tax NPV (using 5% discount rate) US$121 million
After-tax IRR 24.5%
Payback period 3.3 years
Metal price assumptions US$1,250/oz gold and US$17/oz silver

 

Further details can be found in the Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report filed on SEDAR on March 11, 2019, which is also available here.

 

Following the completion of the PEA, we commenced feasibility work during the second half of 2018. Work included diamond drilling to obtain material for additional metallurgical testing, for geotechnical evaluations and to test a few near-resource exploration concepts. Reverse Circulation (“RC”) drilling was used to explore for groundwater, to drill a few isolated areas of inferred resource, and to ensure there was no or little exploration potential under proposed infrastructure. Trenches and test pits were excavated in the areas of proposed infrastructure for geotechnical evaluations. No significant geotechnical issues were identified by this work and a prospective groundwater source was identified 5 km north of the proposed heap leach.

 

Eighteen metallurgical column-leach tests were run to add to the information from 88 column-leach tests completed by previous operators to determine optimum crush size and feasibility level predicted gold and silver recoveries.

 

 

1 Includes royalties payable

 

  Page 4  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

2018 drilling by type

 

Purpose   Drill_Type   Total_Holes     Total_m  
Metallurgy   DDH     14       2,288.50  
Exploration   DDH     6       1,261.00  
Geotech   DDH     22       1,049.85  
Clay Monitoring   DDH     5       56.00  
Water Exploration   RC     15       6,297.05  
Infill   RC     6       803.13  
Condemnation   RC     7       1,767.68  
    Total     75       13,523.21  

 

Along with feasibility work, environmental assessment studies required for project permitting continued. The Company has an active Community and Social Responsibility (“CSR”) program and activities continued throughout 2018 and into this year.

 

Exploration work to evaluate areas outside the known resource on our 206,000 ha land position started in early 2018. As mineralization previously discovered on the property demonstrates, shallow cover can mask extensive near-surface mineralization, making exploration challenging. We completed a 131 line-km Induced Polarization (“IP”) survey with 400 metre spaced lines in the spring of 2018 over the known deposit, areas of potential development, and an adjoining area to the west. Results showed a low but distinctive chargeability anomaly at depth over the current deposit. Later this year, we intend to drill test a similar anomaly at depth to the west of the resource.

 

Activities during the three months ended March 31, 2019, and Future Plans

 

Work on the feasibility study continued in 2019. Activities included establishing a water well 5 km north of the proposed heap leach that tested at a constant rate of 32 litres per second. This is sufficient to supply the project water needs. We are establishing a second water well close to the proposed pit to provide supply redundancy and to evaluate pit dewatering requirements. Geotechnical evaluations continued as did metallurgical testing. Feasibility level engineering and cost estimates are underway, and we anticipate completion of the feasibility study at the end of Q2 of this year. Total drilling for Q1-2019 was 1,096 metres in 3 holes. We drilled an additional 500 metres subsequent to Q1 in 2 holes. All drilling was for water-related activities and by RC methods.

 

We completed environmental assessment studies required for permitting, though periodic sampling of a number of parameters will be ongoing throughout the life of the project as part of environmental monitoring. Permit application documents are being compiled and we expect to submit these in early Q3 of this year.

 

During January through March 2019, we executed a new IP survey to the southeast of the resource and proposed development area. This 159 line-km survey tested the projection of the San Tiburcio fault, a structure considered important to the emplacement of the known mineralization. Chargeability anomalies outlined by this survey will be drilled later in 2019, once drill permits are secured.

 

Our CSR activities to date in 2019 include:

 

· Giving a 3rd Introduction to Mining Course;

· Becoming a member of the Women in Mining organization;

· Obtaining authorization from CONAGUA to connect power to the San Francisco water well;

· Negotiating and concluding an agreement with the local municipality to share the costs of electrification of the San Francisco well;

· Completing a cooperation agreement to support police officers stationed in San Tiburcio. To date, we’ve provided furniture and kitchen supplies;

  

  Page 5  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

· Applying 30 exams to high school students participating in the open adult education program;

· Working with Ejido El Berrendo to identify and obtain land for the construction of a kindergarten, and meetings with the State Education Department to obtain guidelines and official specifications for the construction of the kindergarten.

 

B. Cerro Quema Project, Panama

 

Project Description and History

 

Our 100%-owned Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open-pit mine with process by heap leaching. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the areas of the current mineral resources and mineral reserves, proposed mine development and the priority drill targets.

 

Mineral concessions are comprised of three contracts between the Republic of Panama and Minera Cerro Quema S.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of Orla. The original 20-year term for these concessions expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). The Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications were received, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal. We have received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. A permit was received on May 8, 2018 to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018, we received two permits to use water for drilling. An existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current mineral resources was extended for two years in May 2018. In October 2018, the government accepted our 2018 concession tax payments, and in February 2019, we paid the 2019 concession tax payments. A new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions was received on February 11, 2019.

 

The Company owns the surface rights for land required to mine the Cerro Quema mineral reserves and to construct and operate a heap leach facility, and part of the land required for proposed upgrades to the project access road.

 

A predecessor company to Orla issued a mineral resource estimate and a Pre-Feasibility Study for Cerro Quema, and an independent technical report entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”).

 

The Cerro Quema Report envisions a standard open pit mine with two pits, one at La Pava and one at Quemita, coupled with a 10,000 tonne per day heap leach facility to extract the gold. With an average head grade of 0.77 g/t Au and a crush size of 80% passing minus 50mm, an average gold recovery of 86% was estimated. This would result in 418,000 ounces of gold production over a 5.3-year mine life.

 

The Cerro Quema Report, which contains the 2014 mineral resource and mineral reserve estimate and Pre-Feasibility Study, was filed on SEDAR by Pershimco Resources Inc. on August 22, 2014. You can download it from SEDAR here.

 

  Page 6  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Cerro Quema Mineral Reserves

  

Zone   Category   Cut-Off
(Au g/t)
    Tonnes (millions)     Au (g/t)     Au (koz)  
  Proven     0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
La Pava   Probable     0.21       7.40       0.67       159  
    Sub-Total     0.21       14.22       0.73       335  
  Proven     0.21                    
Quema   Probable     0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
    Sub-Total     0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
  Proven     0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
Total   Probable     0.21       12.89       0.75       312  
    Total     0.21       19.71       0.77       488  

 

Notes:

(1) Numbers may not add due to rounding.

(2) A cut-off grade of 0.21 g/t of gold is used for reporting mineral reserves.

(3) Mineral reserves are estimated at a gold price of US$1,300 per ounce.

(4) Effective as of June 30, 2014.

(5) See NI 43-101 Technical Report “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” published on August 15, 2014 for additional information. A copy of the report is available on the Company’s website and under the SEDAR profile of Pershimco Resources Inc. at www.sedar.com.

 

2018 Activities

 

During 2018, we conducted drilling at Cerro Quema with one rig in operation. Our work focused on the Caballito copper-gold discovery, and the Sombrero zone which is adjacent to the north of Caballito. A total of 7,536 metres were drilled in 27 holes.

 

The Caballito zone is defined by a 650 to 800-metre-long northwest-southeast trending chargeability anomaly outlined by a 2017 IP survey. It is 350 to 400 metres wide. Highest grade mineralization occurs on the southwest side of the zone and is associated with very low resistivity within the overall chargeability due to very high sulphide content. Widths in excess of 100 metres grading better than 1% copper and associated 0.2 to 0.4 grams per tonne gold have been reported.

 

In 2018, we re-examined core from sulphide intercepts below the Quemita oxide gold mineral reserve located 1.2 km to the northwest of Caballito and found indications of Caballito style copper-gold mineralization with low arsenic. Therefore, we extended the IP grid northward from the area surveyed in 2017 through this area and completed 25 line-km of new surveying in 2018. Results from the new IP indicated areas with potential for similar mineralization as found at Caballito. Six holes drilled north of Caballito in Sombrero intersected variable zones of alteration, but no high-grade mineralization. Further drilling is planned.

 

Activities during the three months ended March 31, 2019

 

The Company has an ongoing environmental management plan that includes maintaining sediment dams, reforestation of previously disturbed areas and active sediment control activities. Baseline surface water quality sampling and groundwater level measurements are also ongoing.

 

The Company has an active community relations program that includes providing hot lunches to 5 to 15-year-old children studying in the 12 schools located within a 15 kilometre radius of the Project. We also provide support for various local amateur sports teams, a youth orchestra, local fairs, and cultural events.

 

  Page 7  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

There have been no exploration activities at Cerro Quema to date in 2019 as the Company has focused its efforts at the Camino Rojo Project.

  

Future Plans

 

The metallurgical test work conducted during 2018 is part of the Company's effort to update the 2014 PFS. We expect to complete the update of the 2014 PFS, including new mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates, in the first half of 2020. In addition to the work on oxide mineralization, we will continue to advance exploration of the Caballito copper-gold sulphide discovery. This style of mineralization, identified late last year, presents potential value to the project in addition to the current heap-leach oxide gold project. In addition to the 1.2 km long trend north of Caballito through to Quemita, the Pelona area in the eastern part of the project provides extensive target area for additional Caballito-style mineralization.

 

C. Monitor Gold Project, Nevada

 

Option Agreements

 

The Monitor Gold Project is a grassroots project in an area where work by past operators showed extensive areas with samples anomalous in gold and other metals associated with alteration, including silicification, within carbonate rocks. Stratigraphic assemblages known to host mineral deposits elsewhere in Nevada are found in the area and there are a number of major structures which could provide conduits for mineralizing fluids. Compilation and evaluation of 2018 results was undertaken during the quarter ended March 31, 2019. No field work was carried out.

 

  Page 8  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

4. Summary of Quarterly Results

 

The following table is based on financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. The figures have been restated because of a change in accounting policy (see note 3 of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018) and are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars.

 

    2019-Q1     2018-Q4     2018-Q3     2018-Q2     2018-Q1     2017-Q4     2017-Q3     2017-Q2  
Exploration expense   $ 7,503     $ 6,066     $ 7,056     $ 4,438     $ 5,273     $ 3,156     $ 2,804     $ 3,635  
General and administrative     217       182       144       126       108       88       82       70  
Professional fees     125       176       79       202       136       46       43       90  
Regulatory and transfer agent     41       205       19       14       40       1       6       26  
Salaries and wages     550       836       422       230       234       813       210       177  
Depreciation     39       40       40       37       36       3       2       2  
Share based payments     1,253       1,065       601       1,523       796       812       822       2,064  
Interest income     (62 )     (117 )     (134 )     (117 )     (86 )     (35 )     (50 )     (51 )
Fair value changes     357       199       153       100       65       8       3       5  
Foreign exchange     13       (133 )     10       (146 )     (6 )     (258 )     472       248  
Impairment common shares                                   27              
Impairment mineral properties                                   261              
Tax expense     4                                            
Net loss   $ 10,040     $ 8,520     $ 8,390     $ 6,407     $ 6,596     $ 4,922     $ 4,394     $ 6,266  
Loss per share (basic and diluted)   $ 0.06     $ 0.05     $ 0.05     $ 0.04     $ 0.04     $ 0.03     $ 0.03     $ 0.05  

 

During 2017, our exploration activity almost entirely focused on Cerro Quema, as we did not acquire the Camino Rojo project until the end of 2017. In 2018, we conducted work on both Cerro Quema and Camino Rojo. To date in 2019, we have continued work on the feasibility study for Camino Rojo. Quarterly variations are due to seasonality for drilling activities and awaiting results from previous quarters’ exploration activities.

 

Administrative costs have trended with the level of activity of the Company. Professional fees have trended with (a) the general activity level of the Company, and (b) major regulatory events such as financings and public listings. The increase in regulatory fees in 2018-Q4 is due to a one-time initial listing fee as the Company started trading on the TSX Exchange.

 

The increase in salaries and wages in 2017-Q4 was related to an accrual of short-term incentive (bonus) payments, as was the increase in 2018-Q3. In 2018-Q4, we accrued for payments related to the departure of the former CEO, which were paid subsequent to the year end.

 

Share based payments expense is generally related to the number of unvested stock options and RSUs outstanding during the quarter. The grants happened during 2017-Q2, 2018-Q2, and 2019-Q1; consequently, those quarters tend to be greater than others. The increase in share-based payments in 2018-Q4 was related to options and bonus shares granted to the incoming CEO.

 

Interest income is directly related to cash on hand, and prevailing interest rates, as we typically invest in higher quality interest-bearing instruments and term deposits. From 2018-Q1, we started receiving loan advances from Goldcorp, which led to quarterly fair value adjustments each quarter, based on changes in (i) prevailing interest rates, (ii) exchange rates, and (iii) estimates of maturity date.

 

Foreign exchange gains and losses vary based on fluctuation of the Canadian dollar versus foreign currency amounts on hand. We tend to hold most of our funds in Canadian dollars until needed.

 

The impairment in mineral properties in 2017-Q4 was the write-off of the Blue Quartz project.

 

  Page 9  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

5. First Quarter of 2019

 

The following table is based on financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. The figures have been restated because of a change in accounting policy (see note 3 of the financial statements) and are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars.

 

A. Comparison to the previous quarter

 

    2019-Q1     2018-Q4     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense   $ 7,503     $ 6,066     $ 1,437     (i) Increased land payments as we concluded agreements with local ejidos, and (ii) annual water use and concession fees payments paid in 2019-Q1.
General and administrative     217       182       76     Increased activity in preparation for post-feasibility study activities.
Professional fees     125       176       (51 )   Decreased as the short form prospectus work was filed in 2019-Q1.
Regulatory and transfer agent     41       205       (164 )   One-time initial listing fees in 2018-Q4 for TSX Exchange.
Salaries and wages     550       836       (327 )   We recorded an accrual in 2018-Q4 for former CEO severance costs.
Depreciation     39       40       (1 )    
Share based payments     1,253       1,065       188     Option grant and bonus shares to incoming CEO in 2018-Q4.  Annual grant to employees in 2019-Q1.
Interest income     (62 )     (117 )     55     Lower cash balances on hand.
Fair value changes     357       199       158     Another loan advance in 2019-Q1, which led to a larger fair value change in the Newmont loan.
Foreign exchange     (13 )     (133 )     146     Decline in the C$ against the MXN and the US$.
Tax expense     4             4      
Net loss   $ 10,040     $ 8,520     $ 1,520      

 

  Page 10  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

B. Comparison to the same quarter last year

 

    2019-Q1     2018-Q1     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense   $ 7,053     $ 5,273     $ 2,230     Activity at Camino Rojo was just ramping up in 2018.  In 2019-Q1 we concluded agreements with local ejidos and paid the annual water use fee.
General and administrative     258       108       150     Overall increased activity over last year.
Professional fees     125       136       (11 )    
Regulatory and transfer agent     41       40       1      
Salaries and wages     509       234       275     Increased staffing as we prepare for post-feasibility activities.
Depreciation     39       36       3      
Share based payments     1,253       796       457     Annual grant in 2019 was in Q1, in 2018 it was in Q2.
Interest income     (62 )     (21 )     (41 )   Greater cash balances on hand, higher interest rates.
Fair value changes     357             357     Fair value change of the Newmont loan.  None in 2018-Q1 as the loan advances were just beginning.
Foreign exchange     13       (6 )     19      
Tax expense     4             4      
Net loss   $ 10,040     $ 6,596     $ 3,444      

 

6. Liquidity

 

Historically the Company's sole source of funding has been the issuance of equity securities for cash, primarily through private placements to sophisticated investors and institutions. We have issued common share capital in many of the past few years, pursuant to private placement financings and the exercise of warrants and options. Our access to exploration financing is always uncertain, and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant equity funding.

 

We had working capital of approximately $7.8 million as at March 31, 2019, compared with $13.6 million at December 31, 2018. We expect to fund the operating costs of the Company over the next twelve months with cash on hand and with further equity and/or debt financings.

 

7. Capital Resources

 

As part of the acquisition of the Camino Rojo Project in November 2017, Goldcorp agreed to provide interest free loans to the Company for all annual land holding costs as they are incurred at Camino Rojo until December 31, 2019, which loans are to be repaid upon commercial production at Camino Rojo in cash or shares, at the Compnay’s option, subject to certain restrictions. To March 31, 2019, a total of MXN 173 million ($11.8 million) had been advanced pursuant to this agreement (to December 31, 2018 – MXN 121 million, or $8.2 million). We will avail ourselves of these loans during 2019 to make our land payments. Accordingly, we believe the Company has sufficient capital resources to maintain its properties in good standing for the next twelve months.

 

The Company had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of March 31, 2019 nor as of the date of this MD&A. We have no other lines of credit or sources of financing which have been arranged but remain unused.

 

Our ability to carry out our long range strategic objectives in future periods depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing activities.

 

  Page 11  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

Three months ended March 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

8. Use of Proceeds

 

On February 15, 2018, the Company completed a brokered financing of 17,581,200 units at a price of $1.75 for gross proceeds of $30,767,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. The Company incurred issuance costs of $1,777,000.

 

As detailed in the table below comparing the approximate use of proceeds from the Company’s offering of units completed in February 2018 and the actual amounts spent as of March 31, 2019, the Company has yet to spend the full amount allocated under the February 2018 prospectus. It is likely we will spend the full amount allocated to activities in the table below in upcoming financial periods. Further, there have been no material variances to the use of proceeds in the February 2018 prospectus, material or otherwise, that have impacted the Company’s ability to achieve its business objectives and milestones as disclosed in the February 2018 prospectus.

 

in thousands of Canadian dollars   Intended use of proceeds per Feb 2018 prospectus     Spent to March 31
 2019
 
Camino Rojo Project                
Project management   $ 400     $ 342  
Drilling (core, metallurgy)     4,300       2,748  
Engineering, technical studies and geology     3,500       2,657  
Environment, CSR, permitting, ejido     1,800       766  
Field & site support     1,200       2,366  
Value-added taxes (IVA)     1,300       989  
Cerro Quema project                
Drilling     1,900       1,989  
Environment, CSR, permitting, community     2,000       444  
Engineering, technical studies and geology     2,000       1,280  
Camp and support, and project management     1,500       1,638  
Salaries and benefits     2,000       1,713  
Other                
Exploration and project evaluation     850       985  
Working capital and general corporate     2,335       4,152  
Total:   $ 25,085     $ 22,069  

 

At the Camino Rojo project, our intent was to complete a PEA, which was completed in Q2 of 2018 and then a subsequent Feasibility Study, which is planned to be completed at the end of Q2 of 2019. Our intent was also to complete environmental assessments and permitting documents required to develop an open pit mine and heap leach facility. This work will be completed in early Q3 of 2019. We had planned to drill regional exploration targets but the regional work has focused mainly on target identification, largely through ground geophysics, rather than drilling. Much of the CSR and land payments were funded via an interest free loan from Newmont. Work continues on advancing the project toward the completion of a feasibility study expected to be completed by mid-2019.

 

At the Cerro Quema project, our intent was to collect the geological, geophysical, and other data required to support the undertaking of an updated mineral resource estimate and a pre-feasibility study on the project and to continue exploration the Caballito discovery. We conducted exploration drilling and metallurgical drilling and completed IP surveys in furtherance of these objectives. The update of the pre-feasibility study is expected to be completed in the first half of 2020.

 

Page 12 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

Three months ended March 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

9. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements requiring disclosure under this section.

 

10. Related Party Transactions

 

This information is provided in note 11 of the accompanying quarterly financial statements.

 

11. Critical Accounting Estimates

 

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

We review estimates and their underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.

 

Judgements, estimates, and assumptions that we have made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in these consolidated financial statements include:

 

A. Functional currency

 

The functional currency for the parent entity and each of its subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of functional currency involves judgements to identify the primary economic environment. We reconsider the functional currency of each entity if there is a change in the underlying transactions, events and conditions which we used to determine the primary economic environment of that entity.

 

B. Business combinations

 

Determining whether a set of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute the acquisition of a business or the acquisition of an asset requires us to make certain judgements as to whether or not the assets acquired and liabilities assumed include the inputs, processes and outputs necessary to constitute a business as defined in IFRS 3 «Business Combinations». If an acquired set of assets and liabilities includes goodwill, the set is presumed to be a business. Based on an assessment of relevant facts and circumstances, management of the Company concluded that the acquisitions of Cerro Quema in 2016 and of Camino Rojo in 2017 were acquisitions of assets. The values assigned to common shares, stock options and warrants issued and the allocation of the purchase price to the net assets in the acquisition were based on estimates and judgements including discount rates, volatility, expected option and warrant lives and the relative fair values of the net assets.

 

C. Exploration and evaluation expenditures

 

The application of the Company’s accounting policy for E&E expenditure requires judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely from either future exploitation or sale (prior to which we expense all E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we capitalize the acquisition costs). It also requires us to make judgements on whether activities have reached a stage that permits development of the mineral resource (prior to which they are treated as E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we treat such costs as projects under development and construction).

 

Page 13 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

Three months ended March 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

We must also apply a number of estimates and assumptions, such as the determination of the quantities and types of mineral resources, which itself involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on resource classification (measured, indicated or inferred). These estimates directly impact accounting decisions related to our E&E expenditures.

 

We must make certain estimates and assumptions about future events and circumstances, particularly, whether economic mineral exploitation is viable. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, we assess indicators of impairment and may conclude to write off such amounts to the statement of profit or loss.

 

D. Title to mineral properties

 

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. Further, we make judgements for properties where concessions terms have expired, and a renewal application has been made and is awaiting approval. We use judgement as to whether the concession renewal application is probable to be received, but ultimately this is beyond our control. If a renewal application is not approved, we could lose rights to those concession.

 

E. Assessment of impairment indicators

 

We apply judgement in assessing whether indicators of impairment or reverse impairment exist for our E&E assets which could result in a test for impairment. We consider internal and external factors, such as our rights to explore, planned expenditures on E&E activities, the technical results of our E&E activities, and the potential for viable operations, to determine whether there are any indicators of impairment or reversal of a previous impairment.

 

F. Share based payments

 

We issue, grant or award different types of share based payments. These include warrants, options, restricted share units, deferred share units, and bonus shares.

 

We make judgments of expected forfeiture rates, the expected lives of these instrument, expected volatilities, and risk free interest rates. In a unit offering, we prorate the proceeds between common shares and warrants using the relative fair value method, the allocation of which requires significant judgement. In the case of bonus shares we use our judgement to estimate expected vesting periods and vesting probabilities.

 

G. Fair value of the Newmont loan

 

We make estimates and assumptions in determining the fair value of the Newmont loan. The loan is repayable at the time of commercial production. Timing and method-of-payment of the ultimate loan repayment are uncertain, and we make estimates of date of repayment, interest rates applicable, and exchange rates. Also uncertain is the exact method of repayment – it may be possible to extinguish this liability by the issuance of common shares, or by the payment of cash in currencies other than the Mexican peso. These uncertainties will result in actual future expenditures differing from the amounts currently provided. Consequently, there could be significant adjustments to the fair value established, which would affect future financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position.

 

H. Site closure provisions

 

We make estimates and assumptions in determining the provisions for asset retirement and site closure. The ultimate rehabilitation costs are uncertain, and cost estimates can vary in response to many factors, including judgements of the extent of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, and regulatory changes. We make estimates of rehabilitation costs and of cost increases, inflation rates, and discount rates. These uncertainties will result in actual future expenditures differing from the amounts currently provided. Consequently, there could be significant adjustments to the provisions established, which would affect future financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position.

 

Page 14 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

12. Financial Instruments

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is inherently exposed to certain financial risks, including market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk, through the use of financial instruments. The timeframe and the manner in which we manage these risks varies based upon our assessment of these risks and available alternatives for mitigation. We do not acquire or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All transactions undertaken are to support our operations.

 

A discussion of these financial risks and our exposure to them is provided in note 18 of the accompanying financial statements.

 

13. Outstanding Share Data

 

As of the date of this MD&A, the Company had the following equity securities outstanding:

 

· 179,493,510 common shares

 

· 18,528,100 warrants

 

· 11,102,655 stock options

 

· 1,500,000 bonus shares

 

· 1,097,639 restricted share units

 

· 420,566 deferred share units

 

You can find further details about these potentially issuable securities in note 10 of the accompanying financial statements.

 

Page 15 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

Three months ended March 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

 

14. Risks and Uncertainties

 

As the Company has not commenced principal operations, historical revenue and expenditure trends are not indicative of future activity. The Company has committed to certain work expenditures and may enter into future agreements. The ability of the Company to fund its future operations and commitments is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing. Risks of the Company’s business include the following:

 

Permits and Licenses

 

The exploitation and development of mineral properties may require the Company to obtain regulatory or other permits and licenses from various governmental licensing bodies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain all necessary permits and licenses that may be required to carry out exploration, development and mining operations on its properties.

 

The Company is awaiting mineral concession renewals at its Cerro Quema Project. There is no assurance that we will receive necessary approvals or extensions, or receive them within a reasonable period of time. Failure to receive the permits or extensions would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations. Additional details are provided in the Cerro Quema Project section of this document.

 

Foreign Country and Political Risk

 

The Company’s principal mineral properties are located in Mexico and Panama. The Company is subject to certain risks, including currency fluctuations, possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mineral titles or other mineral rights, opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations, and mineral exploration and mining activities may be affected in varying degrees by political stability and government regulations relating to the mining industry. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its business. Exploration and development may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on future exploitation and production, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange controls, income taxes, royalties on production, expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine and/or site safety.

 

 

Operating in developing economies such as Mexico and Panama has certain risks, including changes to, or invalidation of, government mining regulations; expropriation or revocation of land or property rights; changes in foreign ownership rights; changes in foreign taxation rates; security issues; corruption; uncertain political climate; narco-terrorist actions or activities; and lack of a stable economic climate.

 

We do not ordinarily carry political risk insurance.

 

Dependence on Exploration-Stage Properties

 

The Company’s current efforts are focused primarily on exploration stage properties. The Camino Rojo and the Cerro Quema Projects may not develop into commercially viable ore bodies, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s potential mineral resource production, profitability, financial performance and results of operations.

 

Estimates of Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves and Production Risks

 

The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates included in this MD&A are estimates based on a number of assumptions, including those stated herein, and any adverse change to those assumptions could require the Company to lower its mineral resource estimate. Until a deposit is actually mined and processed, the quantity and grades of mineral resources must be considered as estimates only. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. In addition, the quantity and/or economic viability of mineral resources may vary depending on, among other things, metal prices, grades, production costs, stripping ratios, recovery rates, permit regulations and other legal requirements, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions. Any material change in the quantity of mineral resources, grade or stripping ratio may affect the economic viability of the Company’s properties. No assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of minerals will in fact be realized or that an identified mineral resource will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) deposit that can be legally and economically exploited. There can also be no assurance that any discoveries of new mineral reserves will be made. Any material reductions in estimates of mineral resources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

 

 

Page 16 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

Three months ended March 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

 

The Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate assumes that the Company can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Company

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by another mining company (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) dated June 19, 2018, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The PEA was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the PEA.

 

 

Mineral resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions

 

The estimation of mineral resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

In particular, the estimation of mineral resources for the Camino Rojo Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the mineral resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached.

 

Although all mineralization included in the Company’s mineral resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the mineral resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in mineral resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Mining Industry

 

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the current exploration programs planned by the Company will result in a profitable commercial mining operation.

 

 

 

Page 17 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

Three months ended March 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

 

Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on many factors, some of which are the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as metal prices which are highly cyclical and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

 

Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk. The Company’s operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration and development of ore, including unusual and unexpected geology formations, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. The Company’s mineral exploration activities are directed towards the search, evaluation and development of mineral deposits. There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Company as described herein will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of ore. There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the discovery and acquisition of properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company will compete with other interests, many of which with greater financial resources, for the opportunity to participate in promising projects. Significant capital investment is required to achieve commercial production from successful exploration efforts.

 

Government Regulation

 

The exploration activities of the Company are subject to various federal, provincial and local laws governing prospecting, development, taxes, labour standards, toxic substances and other matters. Exploration activities are also subject to various federal, provincial and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, and land reclamation. These laws also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Although the Company’s exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations governing operations and exploration activities, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations, amendments to current laws and regulations or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Company’s activities.

 

 

Title Matters

 

Although the Company has diligently investigated title to all mineral concessions (either granted or under re-application) and, to the best of its knowledge (except as otherwise disclosed herein), titles to all its properties are in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to any of the Company’s mineral properties and any of the Company’s properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected encumbrances or defects or governmental actions.

 

Land Title

 

The Company has investigated ownership of all surface rights in which it has an interest, and, to the best of its knowledge, its ownership rights are in good standing. However, all surface rights may be subject to prior claims or agreement transfers, and rights of ownership may be affected by undetected defects. While to the best of the Company's knowledge, titles to all surface rights are in good standing; however, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to the surface rights in which the Company has an interest. The properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and titles may be affected by undetected defects.

 

Environmental Risks and Hazards

 

All phases of the Company’s mineral exploration operations are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulations, laws and permits, if any, will not adversely affect the Company’s operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which the Company holds interests which are unknown to the Company at present, which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties. The Company may become liable for such environmental hazards caused by previous owners and operators of the properties even where it has attempted to contractually limit its liability.

 

 

 

Page 18 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

Three months ended March 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

 

Government approvals and permits are currently, and may in the future be, required in connection with the Company’s operations. To the extent such approvals are required and not obtained; the Company may be curtailed or prohibited from proceeding with planned exploration or development of mineral properties.

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

 

Commodity Prices

 

The profitability of mining operations is significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold and other minerals. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of these minerals and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in metal prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The price of gold and other minerals has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future serious price declines could cause commercial production to be impracticable.

 

Uninsured Risks

 

The Company carries insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers adequate. Risks not insured against include environmental pollution or other hazards against which such corporations cannot insure or against which they may elect not to insure.

 

 

Compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws

 

Orla is subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (1999). In general, these laws prohibit a company and its employees and intermediaries from bribing or making other prohibited payments to foreign officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. The Company’s primary operations are located in Panama, a country which is perceived as having fairly high levels of corruption. Orla cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future anti- corruption regulatory requirements to which the Company’s operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

 

Failure to comply with the applicable legislation and other similar foreign laws could expose the Company and/or its senior management to civil and/or criminal penalties, other sanctions and remedial measures, legal expenses and reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the applicable anti-corruption legislation by Canadian or foreign authorities could also have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

As a consequence of these legal and regulatory requirements, the Company has instituted policies with regard to business ethics, which have been designed to ensure that Orla and its employees comply with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that such efforts have been and will be completely effective in ensuring the Company’s compliance, and the compliance of its employees, consultants, contractors and other agents, with all applicable anticorruption laws and regulations.

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

Certain directors of the Company also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in natural resource exploration and development. Consequently, there exists the possibility for such directors to be in a position of conflict. Any decision made by such directors involving the Company will be made in accordance with their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with the Company and such other companies. In addition, such directors will declare, and refrain from voting on, any matter in which such directors may have a conflict of interest.

 

 

 

Page 19 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Three months ended March 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

 

15. Forward Looking Statements

 

This MD&A contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding planned exploration and development programs and expenditures, the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, expectations on the potential extension of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema project; proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema project and the Camino Rojo project; Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits, required agreements with third parties and regulatory approvals, including but not limited to, the receipt of the Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) permit related to the Cerro Quema project and other necessary permitting required to implement expected future exploration plans; community and ejido relations; availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of mineral reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; currency and interest rate fluctuations. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the future price of gold, anticipated costs and the Company’s ability to fund its programs, the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities, the Company’s ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements, the timing and results of drilling programs, the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Company’s mineral properties, the obtaining of an agreement with the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein) to develop the entire Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate, the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects, the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner and the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements include, among others: (i) failure to obtain required regulatory and stock exchange approvals with respect to any Offering; (ii) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (iii) delays in or failure to obtain an agreement with the Adjacent Owner with respect to the Camino Rojo Project; (iv) health, safety and environmental risks; (v) success of exploration, development and operations activities; (vi) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (vii) delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (viii) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (ix) uncertainty in estimates of production, capital and operation costs and potential for production and cost overruns; (x) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (xi) the fluctuating price of gold; (xii) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xiii) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; and (xiv) the Company’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions.

 

 

Page 20 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis 

Three months ended March 31, 2019 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risks and Uncertainties” in this MD&A for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

 

You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this MD&A and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. You are urged to read the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which you can view online under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com

 

 

 

 

16. Abbreviations Used

 

$, or C$ Canadian dollars
   
US$ United States dollars
   
AIF Annual Information Form
   
Ag Silver
   
Au Gold
   
Camino Rojo Report An independent technical report for the Camino Rojo Project entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 (the “Camino Rojo Report”) prepared by Carl E. Defilippi, RM, SME of Kappes Cassiday & Associates (“KCA”), Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. of Resource Geosciences Incorporated (“RGI”), and Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM of Independent Mining Consultants Inc. (“IMC”).  
   
Canplats Canplats Resources Corporation
   
Cerro Quema Report
or
2014 PFS
An independent technical report for the Cerro Quema Project entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”) prepared by Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA.  
   
CFE Comisión Federal de Electricidad, the state-owned electric utility of Mexico
   
Company Orla Mining Ltd.
   
CSR Community and Social Responsibility
   
ESIA Estudio de Impacto Ambiental, a Panamanian environmental impact study
   
g/t Grams per metric tonne
   
Goldcorp Goldcorp Inc., a predecessor company to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, prior to April 18, 2019.
   
Newmont Newmont Goldcorp Corporation, a publicly traded company resulting from the combination of Newmont Mining Corporation and Goldcorp Inc., effective April 18, 2019.
   
ha Hectares
   
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
   
IP Induced polarization
   
K tonnes Thousands of metric tonnes
   
Koz Thousands of troy ounces
   
M&I Measured and indicated
   
MD&A Management's Discussion and Analysis
   
NI 43-101 Canadian National Instrument 43-101
   
PEA Preliminary Economic Assessment
   
PFS Pre-Feasibility Study
   
RC Reverse circulation
   
SEDAR

The System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval, a filing system operated by the Canadian Securities Administrators, accessible at:

www.sedar.com

   
tonne 1,000 kilograms (approximately 2,205 pounds)
   
TSX Toronto Stock Exchange

 

Page 21 

 

Exhibit 99.77

 

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Jason Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended March 31, 2019.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on January 1, 2019 and ended on March 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date: May 9, 2019

 

/s/ Jason Simpson  
Jason Simpson
Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.78 

 

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

FULL CERTIFICATE

 

I, Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended March 31, 2019.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

 

4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (“DC&P”) and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

 

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

 

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

 

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

 

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is "Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

 

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: Not applicable

 

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: Not applicable

 

6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on January 1, 2019 and ended on March 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

 

Date: May 9, 2019

 

/s/ Etienne Morin  
Etienne Morin
Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Exhibit 99.79

 

Date: April 3, 2019

 

To: All Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities

 

Subject: ORLA MINING LTD.

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

We advise of the following with respect to the upcoming Meeting of Security Holders for the subject Issuer:

 

Meeting Type : Annual General and Special Meeting
Record Date for Notice of Meeting : April 25, 2019
Record Date for Voting (if applicable) : April 25, 2019
Beneficial Ownership Determination Date : April 25, 2019
Meeting Date : June 12, 2019
Meeting Location (if available) : Vancouver, BC
Issuer sending proxy related materials directly to NOBO: No
Issuer paying for delivery to OBO: No

 

Notice and Access (NAA) Requirements:

 

NAA for Beneficial Holders No
NAA for Registered Holders No

 

Voting Security Details:

 

Description CUSIP Number ISIN
COMMON SHARES 68634K106 CA68634K1066

 

Sincerely,

 

Computershare

Agent for ORLA MINING LTD.

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.80

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Information Form

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

March 28, 2019

 

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
     
INTRODUCTORY NOTES AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS   2
     
CORPORATE STRUCTURE   7
     
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS   8
     
DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS   12
     
MINERAL PROJECTS   18
     
RISK FACTORS   52
     
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE   63
     
DIVIDENDS   64
     
MARKET FOR SECURITIES   64
     
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS   65
     
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS   68
     
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS   68
     
TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS   68
     
MATERIAL CONTRACTS   68
     
INTERESTS OF EXPERTS   68
     
AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION   69
     
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION   72
     
SCHEDULE “A”   73

 

Page 1

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

INTRODUCTORY NOTES AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS

 

GENERAL

 

In this Annual Information Form (“AIF”), Orla Mining Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, as the context requires, is referred to as the “Company” and “Orla”. Unless otherwise stated, all information contained in this AIF is as at December 31, 2018, being the date of the Company’s most recently completed financial year.

 

This AIF should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis for the financial year ended December 31, 2018, which are available under the Company’s profile on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) website at www.sedar.com.

 

CURRENCY PRESENTATION AND EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION

 

This AIF contains references to Canadian (“$” or “C$”) and United States dollars (“US dollars” or “US$”). All dollar amounts referenced, unless otherwise indicated, are expressed in Canadian dollars. Unless otherwise indicated, United States dollar amounts have been converted to Canadian dollars at the noon exchange rate on December 31, 2018, as quoted by the Bank of Canada, of US$0.7330 = C$1.00.

 

GOLD PRICES

 

The high, low, average, and closing PM fix gold (“gold” or “Au”) prices in United States dollars per troy ounce for each of the three years preceding the period ended December 31, 2018, as quoted by the London Bullion Market Association, were as follows:

 

      Year Ended December 31  
    2018       2017       2016  
High     US$ 1,355       US$ 1,346       US$ 1,366  
Low     US$ 1,178       US$ 1,151       US$ 1,077  
Average     US$ 1,268       US$ 1,257       US$ 1,251  
Closing     US$ 1,282       US$ 1,291       US$ 1,146  

 

SILVER PRICES

 

The high, low, average, and closing PM fix silver (“silver” or “Ag”) prices in United States dollars per troy ounce for each of the three years preceding the period ended December 31, 2018, as quoted by the London Bullion Market Association, were as follows:

 

      Year Ended December 31  
    2018       2017       2016  
High     US$ 17.52       US$ 18.56       US$ 20.71  
Low     US$ 13.97       US$ 15.22       US$ 13.58  
Average     US$ 15.71       US$ 17.05       US$ 17.14  
Closing     US$ 15.47       US$ 16.87       US$ 16.24  

 

Page 2

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This AIF contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements are included to provide information about management’s current expectations and plans that allows investors and others to get a better understanding of the Company’s operating environment, the business operations and financial performance and condition.

 

Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding planned exploration and development programs and expenditures, the estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (each as defined herein), expectations on the potential extension of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema Project (as defined herein); proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema Project and the Camino Rojo Project (as defined herein); Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits, required agreements with third parties and regulatory approvals required in connection with mining and mineral processing operations, including but not limited to, the receipt of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (“ESIA”) permit related to the Cerro Quema Project and other necessary permitting required to implement expected future exploration plans; community and ejido relations; availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of mineral reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; currency and interest rate fluctuations. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the future price of gold, anticipated costs and the Company’s ability to fund its programs, the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities, the Company’s ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements, the timing and results of drilling programs, the discovery of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves on the Company’s mineral properties, the obtaining of an agreement with the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein) to develop the entire Camino Rojo Project Mineral Resource estimate, the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects, the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner and the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others: (i) access to additional capital; (ii) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves; (iii) delays in or failures to enter into an agreement with the Adjacent Owner with respect to the Camino Rojo Project; (iv) health, safety and environmental risks; (v) success of exploration, development and operation activities; (vi) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (vii) delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (viii) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (ix) uncertainty in estimates of production, capital and operating costs and potential of production and cost overruns; (x) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (xi) the fluctuating price of gold; (xii) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xiii) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; (xiv) the Company’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions; and (xv) volatility in the market price of Company's securities.

 

Page 3

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” below for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this AIF and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. Investors are urged to read the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which can be viewed online under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

Investors are cautioned that all of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s Mineral Resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by another mining company (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the Mineral Resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION

 

Unless otherwise indicated, scientific and technical information in this AIF relating to the Company’s mineral properties has been reviewed and approved by Hans Smit, P.Geo., the Chief Operating Officer, and a director of the Company (“Director”). Mr. Smit is a “Qualified Person” as defined under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”).

 

The disclosure included in this AIF uses Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources classification terms that comply with reporting standards in Canada and the Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimations are made in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards on Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources adopted by the CIM Council on May 10, 2014 and NI 43-101. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators that establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. The following definitions are reproduced from the CIM Standards:

 

A “Mineral Resource” is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated, or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling. Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories.

 

An “Inferred Mineral Resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated based on limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that most of the Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.

 

Page 4

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

An “Indicated Mineral Resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of Modifying Factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from adequately detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to assume geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource and may only be converted to a Probable Mineral Reserve.

 

A “Measured Mineral Resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of Modifying Factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to confirm geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. A Measured Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than that applying to either an Indicated Mineral Resource or an Inferred Mineral Resource. It may be converted to a Proven Mineral Reserve or to a Probable Mineral Reserve.

 

A “Mineral Reserve” is the economically mineable part of a Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when the material is mined or extracted and is defined by studies at Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility level as appropriate that include application of Modifying Factors. Such studies demonstrate that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified. The reference point at which Mineral Reserves are defined, usually the point where the ore is delivered to the processing plant, must be stated. It is important that, in all situations where the reference point is different, such as for a saleable product, a clarifying statement is included to ensure that the reader is fully informed as to what is being reported. Mineral Reserves are sub-divided in order of increasing confidence into Probable Mineral Reserves and Proven Mineral Reserves. The public disclosure of a Mineral Reserve must be demonstrated by a Pre-Feasibility Study or Feasibility Study.

 

A “Probable Mineral Reserve” is the economically mineable part of an Indicated, and in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource. The confidence in the Modifying Factors applying to a Probable Mineral Reserve is lower than that applying to a Proven Mineral Reserve. Probable Mineral Reserve estimates must be demonstrated to be economic, at the time of reporting, by at least a Pre-Feasibility Study.

 

A “Proven Mineral Reserve” is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource. A Proven Mineral Reserve implies a high degree of confidence in the Modifying Factors. Proven Mineral Reserve estimates must be demonstrated to be economic, at the time of reporting, by at least a Pre-Feasibility Study.

 

“Modifying Factors” are considerations used to convert Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves. These include, but are not restricted to, mining, processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social, and governmental factors.

 

Page 5

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO UNITED STATES INVESTORS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MEASURED, INDICATED, AND INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES

 

This AIF has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of United States securities laws and uses terms that are not recognized by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Canadian reporting requirements for disclosure of mineral properties are governed by the Canadian Securities Administrators’ NI 43-101. The definitions used in NI 43-101 are incorporated by reference from the CIM Standards. United States reporting requirements are currently governed by the SEC Industry Guide 7 (“SEC Industry Guide 7”) under the Securities Act. These reporting standards have similar goals in terms of conveying an appropriate level of confidence in the disclosures being reported but embody different approaches and definitions. For example, the terms “Mineral Reserve,” “Proven Mineral Reserve” and “Probable Mineral Reserve” are Canadian mining terms as defined in NI 43-101, and these definitions differ from the definitions in SEC Industry Guide 7. Under SEC Industry Guide 7 standards, a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study is required to report reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority. Further, under SEC Industry Guide 7, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. Reserve estimates contained in this AIF may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC Industry Guide 7. Further, the SEC has not recognized the reporting of mineral deposits which do not meet the SEC Industry Guide 7 definition of “reserve” prior to the adoption of the Modernization of Property Disclosures for Mining Registrants, which rules will be required to be complied with in the first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2021.

 

While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. In addition, “Inferred Mineral Resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules and regulations, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies or other economic studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. Accordingly, information contained in this AIF containing descriptions of mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

 

Page 6

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CORPORATE STRUCTURE

 

NAME, ADDRESS AND INCORPORATION

 

The Company was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) on May 31, 2007 as a Capital Pool Company (as defined by the TSX Venture Exchange (the “TSXV”)). On June 3, 2010, the Company was continued into British Columbia under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) and on April 21, 2015, the Company was continued into Ontario under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario). On June 12, 2015, the Company changed its name from “Red Mile Minerals Corp.” to “Orla Mining Ltd.” On December 2, 2016, in order to facilitate the acquisition of Pershimco Resources Inc. (“Pershimco”), the Company was continued as a federal company under the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “CBCA”). Following the continuance, on December 6, 2016, the plan of arrangement under the CBCA involving Orla and Pershimco (the “Arrangement”) was affected. Pursuant to the Arrangement, among other things, Orla and Pershimco were amalgamated and continued as one company under the name “Orla Mining Ltd.”

 

The Company’s registered office and its head and principal office is located at Suite 1240 - 1140 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E 4G1.

 

INTERCORPORATE RELATIONSHIPS

 

The following is a diagram of the intercorporate relationships among Orla and its material subsidiaries, including their respective jurisdictions of incorporation.

 

 

 

Inactive subsidiaries and those with both less than 10% of the total assets of the Company and 10% of the total revenues of the Company are excluded. As required under Mexican corporate law, Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV has two shareholders – Orla Mining Ltd. holds 98% of the shares and 2% are held by Hans Smit, the Chief Operating Officer of the Company, who holds his shares in trust for the Company.

 

Page 7

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS

 

OVERVIEW

 

Orla is a Canadian company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”). The Company's focus is on the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral exploration opportunities in which the Company's exploration and development expertise could substantially enhance shareholder value. The Company currently has two core projects, the Camino Rojo project in Zacatecas State, Mexico (the “Camino Rojo Project”) and the Cerro Quema project in Los Santos Province, Panama (the “Cerro Quema Project”).

 

The Camino Rojo Project is an advanced gold oxide heap leach project in a low risk jurisdiction, which leverages management’s and the Company’s Board of Directors’ (the “Board” or “Board of Directors”) extensive exploration, development, and operating experience in Mexico. The Camino Rojo Project boasts a large prospective land package covering over 200,000 hectares (“ha”). Access and infrastructure are excellent with a paved highway and powerline nearby. A NI 43-101 technical report dated June 19, 2018 and amended on March 11, 2019 containing a current Mineral Resource estimation for the Camino Rojo Project has been filed under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. For further details regarding the Camino Rojo Project, see “Mineral Projects – Camino Rojo Project”.

 

The Cerro Quema Project includes mineralized zones with the potential to support a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project concession covers 14,800 ha and boasts paved road access, supportive local communities, and private land ownership. The Cerro Quema Project is currently in the last stage of the permitting process for a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. For further details regarding the Cerro Quema Project, see “Mineral Projects – Cerro Quema Project”.

 

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS

 

THREE YEAR HISTORY OF ORLA

 

Orla’s history prior to appointment of management in June 2015 is not material to the current business of the Company.

 

Subsequent to the appointment of management in June 2015 and prior to the acquisition of Pershimco by Orla in December 2016, the principal activities of Orla included:

 

· On June 10, 2015, Orla announced that, at the annual and special shareholders meeting, the shareholders of the Company approved the name change from Red Mile Minerals Corp. to “Orla Mining Ltd.” The name change was effective on June 12, 2015 and at market open on June 12, 2015, the Company’s common shares (the “Old Orla Shares”) commenced trading on the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”) under the name “Orla Mining Ltd.” with the new trading symbol “OLA”. In addition, shareholders of the Company unanimously voted in favor of the proposed Director nominees, being Messrs.  Troy Fierro, Richard Hall, Marc Prefontaine, Hans Smit, Kerry Sparkes and Aaron Wolfe. Following the meeting, Troy Fierro was appointed Non-Executive Chairman of the Board; Marc Prefontaine was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer; Hans Smit was appointed Chief Operating Officer; and Paul Robertson was appointed Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary.

 

· On July 8, 2016, Orla closed a non-brokered private placement financing for gross proceeds of C$7,000,000. The Company issued 14,000,000 units (each, a “2016 Unit”) at a price of C$0.50 per 2016 Unit. Each 2016 Unit consisted of one Old Orla Share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a “2021 Warrant”). Each 2021 Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one Old Orla Share at an exercise price of C$0.62 until July 8, 2021. These 2021 Warrants became exercisable for Common Shares (as defined below) in connection with the Arrangement, as discussed below. Insiders of the Company accounted for approximately 46% of the total financing. The Company used the net proceeds to further asset review and evaluation opportunities, and for general working capital purposes.

 

Page 8

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

  

THREE YEAR HISTORY OF PERSHIMCO

 

Prior to the acquisition of Pershimco by Orla in December 2016, the principal activities of Pershimco included:

 

· On January 28, 2014, Pershimco closed a non-brokered private placement with Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico Eagle”) and Sentient Executive GP IV Limited (“Sentient”) for aggregate gross proceeds of C$11,198,692.

 

· In July 2014, Pershimco issued its prefeasibility study of the Cerro Quema Project, which was intended to help determine the value of the Mineral Reserves contained in the oxidized gold domain of the La Pava and Quemita deposits. This study considers the work made by previous owners, as well as the work completed since Pershimco acquired the property. It provides a significant internal rate of return of 45.8% pre-tax and pre-royalties (33.7% after tax and royalties).

 

· On May 14, 2015, Pershimco completed a brokered private placement for aggregate gross proceeds of C$7,071,203. Agnico Eagle and Sentient participated, increasing each of their ownership percentages to 19.9% of the then outstanding common shares of Pershimco (the “Pershimco Shares”).

 

· On May 16, 2015, the Autoridad Nacional del Medio Ambiente (“ANAM”) of Panama successfully completed public hearings on the Cerro Quema Project. During the hearings, ANAM heard the views of local leaders and residents concerning the Cerro Quema Project’s potential environmental and social impact. The ANAM public consultations represented a major milestone for Pershimco in order to initiate the technical review and recommendations on the ESIA.

 

· On August 20, 2015, Pershimco completed a non-brokered private placement with EXP T1 Ltd., an affiliate of RK Mine Finance (“Red Kite”), for aggregate gross proceeds of C$3,266,000. The private placement was completed in connection with the arranging of a senior secured facility with Red Kite for US$15 million.

 

· In November 2015, Pershimco acquired all the issued and outstanding shares of Aurum Exploration Inc. (“Aurum”), a Panamanian company, from Bellhaven Copper and Gold Inc., for cash consideration of US$140,000. The acquisition of Aurum increased the Cerro Quema Project to a total of 72,000 ha of concessions and concession application rights along the Azuero mineralized belt.

 

THE PERSHIMCO ACQUISITION

 

On September 14, 2016, Orla and Pershimco entered into a definitive arrangement agreement (the “Arrangement Agreement”) to amalgamate the two companies by way of a court-approved Arrangement under the CBCA. Concurrently with entering into the Arrangement Agreement, Orla subscribed for 12,121,212 Pershimco Shares at a price of C$0.33 per Pershimco Share in a private placement for total gross proceeds to Pershimco of approximately C$4 million, representing approximately 4% of the Pershimco Shares on a pro forma basis. The private placement financing was not conditional on the completion of the Arrangement.

 

In connection with the proposed Arrangement, Orla entered into an agreement with GMP Securities L.P. on behalf of a syndicate of agents (the “Agents”) to complete a private placement of subscription receipts (the “Subscription Receipts”) for total gross proceeds of approximately C$50 million at a price of C$1.75 per Subscription Receipt. The gross proceeds were held in escrow in order to be released immediately prior to the completion of the Arrangement upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. Each Subscription Receipt entitled the holder thereof to one Old Orla Share on satisfaction of the release conditions, which Old Orla Shares would then participate in the Arrangement, as discussed below. Insiders of Orla participated in the financing and subscribed for an aggregate of 12,604,000 Subscription Receipts representing 44.1% of the outstanding Subscription Receipts sold under the private placement, and minority shareholder approval was obtained for the insider participation.

 

On December 6, 2016, Orla announced the completion of the Arrangement and the release of the proceeds of the private placement of Subscription Receipts from escrow. The proceeds were used to repay any amounts owed to Red Kite, for exploration at the Cerro Quema Project and for general corporate purposes. On closing, Messrs.  Jean Robitaille and Alain Bureau were appointed to the Board.

 

Page 9

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

  

Under the Arrangement, each Orla shareholder received one common share of the amalgamated Orla entity (the “Common Shares”) in exchange for each Old Orla Share held. Each Pershimco shareholder received (i) 0.19 of a Common Share for each Pershimco Share held; and (ii) 0.04 of a class A common share of Orla. Each whole class A common share entitled its holder to receive, without payment of additional consideration, one Common Share conditional upon the issuance of a ministerial resolution by the Ministry of Environment of Panama, accepting the ESIA for the Cerro Quema Project on or prior to January 31, 2017. All outstanding options and warrants of both Orla and Pershimco were exchanged for equivalent securities of Orla in accordance with the Arrangement, while the outstanding restricted share units of Pershimco were paid out in either cash or Common Shares.

 

Following completion of the Arrangement, Orla had approximately 115.86 million Common Shares issued and outstanding with approximately 53.1% of the Common Shares being held by former shareholders of Orla and 46.9% of the Common Shares being held by former shareholders of Pershimco. Additionally, Orla had approximately 11.44 million class A shares issued and outstanding, which were all held by former shareholders of Pershimco. The 12,121,212 Pershimco Shares held by Orla were cancelled in connection with the Arrangement.

 

On December 7, 2016, the post-arrangement Common Shares commenced trading on the TSXV under the symbol OLA.

 

Effective as of December 28, 2016, the Company changed its auditors from Manning Elliott LLP to Davidson and Company LLP.

 

DEVELOPMENTS SUBSEQUENT TO THE PERSHIMCO ACQUISITION

 

On February 2, 2017 Orla announced that the ESIA was not received prior to January 31, 2017 and, as a result and in accordance with their terms, any right held by the holders of class A common shares to receive Common Shares was terminated

 

On June 19, 2017, at the annual meeting of shareholders of Orla, Messrs.  Charles Jeannes, George Albino and Tim Haldane were elected to the Board, alongside returning Directors Messrs.  Richard Hall, Marc Prefontaine, Jean Robitaille, and Hans Smit. Following the meeting, Mr. Jeannes was appointed Non-Executive Chairman of the Board. Each of Mr. Troy Fierro, Mr. Alain Bureau and Mr. Aaron Wolfe did not stand for re-election.

 

On June 21, 2017, Orla announced it had entered into an asset purchase agreement dated June 20, 2017, as amended (the “Camino Agreement”) pursuant to which Orla would acquire the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp Inc. (“Goldcorp”) for consideration to Goldcorp consisting of 31,860,141 Common Shares and a 2.0% net smelter royalty (the “Camino Acquisition”). On November 7, 2017, Orla and Goldcorp Inc. completed the Camino Acquisition. Following the Camino Acquisition, Goldcorp held 31,860,141 Common Shares, representing 19.9% of the then outstanding Common Shares.

 

In addition, Orla and Goldcorp entered into an option agreement dated November 7, 2017 (the “Option Agreement”) regarding the potential future development of a sulphide operation at the Camino Rojo Project whereby Goldcorp will, subject to the sulphide project meeting certain thresholds, have an option to acquire a 60% to 70% interest in such sulphide project at the Camino Rojo Project. Orla will be the operator of the Camino Rojo Project and will have full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. However, in the event sulphide projects are defined through one or more positive pre-feasibility studies outlining a development scenario as outlined below, Goldcorp will have an option to enter into a joint venture with Orla for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of such a sulphide project.

 

In connection with the issuance of the Common Shares by the Company to Goldcorp, the parties entered into an investor rights agreement (the “IRA”). The IRA provides that (i) Goldcorp will not sell any of the Common Shares for a period of two years from the closing date, except in certain circumstances; (ii) for so long as Goldcorp maintains at least a 10.0% equity interest in the Company, it will have the right to participate in future equity offerings used to advance the Cerro Quema or Camino Rojo projects, in order to maintain its pro rata ownership and (iii) Goldcorp will have the right to appoint one nominee to the Board of Directors. In connection with the closing of the Camino Acquisition, Mr. Steven Thomas was appointed to the Board as the nominee of GoldCorp. On March 29, 2018, the Company announced that Mr. David Stephens was appointed to the Board, replacing Mr. Thomas as Goldcorp’s nominee.

 

Page 10

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

DEVELOPMENTS DURING 2018

 

On January 25, 2018, Orla entered into an agreement to acquire up to a 100% interest in the Monitor Gold exploration project (the “Monitor Gold Project”) covering approximately 2,800 ha in central Nevada. The agreement is structured as a lease between the vendor, Mountain Gold Claims LLC (“Mountain Gold”), a privately held Nevada company, Orla and Monitor Gold Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Orla. The agreement covers an initial 340 claims and is subject to a surrounding area of interest (the “AOI”) in which any additional mineral claims Orla acquires will become part of the lease and a right for Orla to acquire ownership of any claims required to develop a mining operation. Mountain Gold retains a 3% net smelter royalty covering the claims and any new claims in the AOI, with Orla having the right to purchase a portion of this royalty and a right of first refusal on the remaining portion. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Orla is required to make an advanced royalty payment of US$5,000 on execution of the agreement, and advanced royalty payments in the aggregate amount of US$525,000, as allocated per year in the agreement until the 10th anniversary date, and US$100,000 on the 11th anniversary date and each anniversary date thereafter. Orla has annual work commitments in the aggregate of US$155,000 for the first four years of the lease, and US$100,000 for the fifth year and each year thereafter. In addition, Orla will be required to make payments of US$50,000, US$150,000 and US$250,000, on each of the first, third and fifth anniversary dates, respectively, with such payments to be satisfied in cash or through the issuance of Common Shares, which shares will be issued at a price based on the closing price of the Common Shares on the date prior to the applicable anniversary date or such other price as may be required by the applicable stock exchange. On January 28, 2019, the Company issued 58,895 Common Shares at a deemed price of $1.10 per share to Mountain Gold in respect of the annual share consideration to be issued by the Company on the first anniversary. The Monitor Gold Project is not considered to be a material project for the Company.

 

On February 15, 2018, Orla closed a bought deal financing with a syndicate of underwriters and issued 17,581,200 units (each, a “2018 Unit”) of Orla at a price of C$1.75 per 2018 Unit for gross proceeds of C$30,767,100 (the “2018 Offering”). Each 2018 Unit was comprised of one Common Share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a “2018 Warrant”), where each full 2018 Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one Common Share at a price of C$2.35 until February 15, 2021. The 2018 Units were sold pursuant to an underwriting agreement between the Company and a syndicate of investment dealers led by GMP Securities L.P. The 2018 Units issued under the 2018 Offering were offered by way of short form prospectus in all the Provinces of Canada, other than Québec and sold elsewhere outside of Canada on a private placement basis. Goldcorp and Agnico Eagle each subscribed for such number of 2018 Units from the 2018 Offering as were necessary to maintain their ownership positions in Orla of approximately 19.9% and 9.9%, respectively. Orla is utilizing the net proceeds of the 2018 Offering for exploration and development activities at its Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema projects and for general corporate purposes.

 

On April 30, 2018, Mr. Etienne Morin was appointed as the new Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

 

On May 29, 2018, Orla announced the results of a positive preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) and a Mineral Resource estimate on the Camino Rojo Project. See “Mineral Projects – Camino Rojo Project”.

 

On June 27, 2018, Orla held its annual shareholder meeting at which all of the Company’s incumbent Directors were re-elected and the shareholders: (i) approved the re-appointment of the Auditors (ii) re-approved the Company’s existing stock option plan; (iii) approved the adoption of the Company’s new Restricted Share Unit Plan, and (iv) approved the adoption of the Company’s new Deferred Share Unit Plan.

 

On November 1, 2018, the Common Shares commenced trading on the TSX and were delisted from trading on the TSXV.

 

  Page 11  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

On November 12, 2018, Mr. Jason Simpson assumed the role as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer upon the resignation of Mr. Marc Prefontaine. In addition to the role of President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Simpson was also appointed a Director of the Company.

 

DEVELOPMENTS SUBSEQUENT TO DECEMBER 31, 2018

 

On March 11, 2019, the Company filed a short form base shelf prospectus (the “Base Shelf Prospectus”) with the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces and territories of Canada, except Quebec, which allows the Company to offer for sale and issue from time to time Common Shares, warrants to purchase Common Shares, subscription receipts, units and debt securities, or any combination thereof, having a total aggregate offering price for such securities, of up to $300,000,000 (or the equivalent thereof in other currencies) during the 25-month period that the Base Shelf Prospectus, including any amendments thereto, remains effective.

 

In July of 2018, an independent technical report for the Camino Rojo Project titled “Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 (the “Camino Rojo Report”) was filed under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com to support the previously announced PEA. Subsequently, as a result of a review by the British Columbia Securities Commission (“BCSC”) conducted in connection with the filing of the above-mentioned Base Shelf Prospectus, an amended NI 43-101 technical report titled “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019 (the “Amended Camino Rojo Report”) was filed under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. The Amended Camino Rojo Report includes enhanced disclosure in accordance with NI 43-101 in order to add clarity on certain risks related to the Mineral Resource estimation, including the portion of the Camino Rojo Project Mineral Resource estimate located at depth, that would require an agreement to access the neighbouring property to enable a larger sulphide development option. The Mineral Resource estimate along with the results of the PEA for the Camino Rojo Project have not changed. See “Mineral Projects – Camino Rojo Project”.

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS

 

SUMMARY

 

As described above under “General Development of the Business”, the Company is a natural resource exploration and development company engaged in the business of acquisition and development of mineral properties whose current efforts are focused on its Camino Rojo Project and Cerro Quema Project. See “Mineral Projects – Camino Rojo Project” and “Mineral Projects – Cerro Quema Project”.

 

SPECIALIZED SKILL AND KNOWLEDGE

 

All aspects of the Company’s business require specialized skills and knowledge. Such skills and knowledge include the areas of geology, mining, metallurgy, environmental permitting, corporate social responsibility, and accounting. Orla faces competition for qualified personnel with these specialized skills and knowledge, which may increase costs of operations or result in delays.

 

COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS

 

The mineral exploration and mining business is competitive. Competition is primarily for: (a) mineral properties that can be developed and produced economically; (b) technical experts that can find, develop and mine such mineral properties; (c) labour to operate the mineral properties; and (d) capital to finance development and operations.

 

  Page 12  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Company competes with other mining companies, some of which have greater financial resources and technical facilities, for the acquisition of mineral concessions, claims, leases, and other interests, to finance its activities and in the recruitment and retention of qualified employees. The ability of the Company to acquire and develop precious metal properties will depend not only on its ability to raise the necessary funding but also on its ability to select and acquire suitable prospects for precious metal development or metal exploration. See “Financing Risks” and “Competition” under “Risk Factors”.

 

HEALTH AND SAFETY

 

The Company is committed to the health and safety of its employees and strives to create and maintain a safe working environment by complying with all applicable health and safety laws, rules, and regulations. Orla acknowledges that there are safety risks associated with its business and, through proactive risk management, continuously aims to minimize and control these risks. The Company now has a Health and Safety department with full time personnel at both Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema Projects and continues to develop Health and Safety policy and procedures. For 2018, there were no lost time injuries reported.

 

In order to ensure consistent oversight and proactive risk management, the Board has established an Environmental, Health and Safety Committee (discussed below in this AIF under the section entitled “Key Policies and Committees”) to assist the Board in its oversight role with respect to environmental, health and safety matters concerning the Company. The Environmental, Health and Safety Committee is responsible for, among other things, ensuring that the Company provides training, instruction, and equipment to its personnel so that they may carry out their work in a manner that is safe for them and their colleagues.

 

EMPLOYEES

 

As at December 31, 2018, the Company had 108 employees, which includes employees located in Canada (4), Panama (77) and Mexico (27). In addition, there were 23 contractors working on the Cerro Quema Project and 52 contractors working on the Camino Rojo Project.

 

No management functions of the Company are performed to any substantial degree by a person other than the Directors or executive officers of the Company.

 

BANKRUPTCY AND SIMILAR PROCEDURES

 

There have been no bankruptcy, receivership, or similar proceedings against the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or any voluntary bankruptcy, receivership, or similar proceedings by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, within the three most recently completed financial years or during or proposed for the current financial year.

 

FOREIGN OPERATIONS

 

The locations of the Company’s Camino Rojo Project in Mexico and Cerro Quema Project in Panama expose the Company to certain risks, including currency fluctuations and possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mining titles or other mineral rights. Mineral exploration and mining activities in foreign jurisdictions may also be affected in varying degrees by political stability and governmental regulations relating to the mining industry; labour unrest; expropriation; renegotiation or termination of existing concessions; ability of governments to unilaterally alter agreements; surface land access; illegal mining; changes in taxation policies or laws; and repatriation of funds. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes in such foreign countries are beyond the Company’s control and may adversely affect the Company’s business. See “Risk Factors – Foreign Country and Political Risk”.

 

  Page 13  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

ENVIRONMENTAL AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

  

Mining, exploration, and development activities are subject to various levels of federal, provincial, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment at all phases of operation. These regulations govern exploration, development, tenure, production, taxes, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection and remediation of the environment, reclamation, mine safety, toxic substances, and other matters. These regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards and land reclamation. They also set forth limitations on the general handling, transportation, storage, and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors, and employees. To the best knowledge of the Company, it is in compliance with all environmental laws and regulations in effect where its properties are located. Environmental protection requirements did not have a material effect on the capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position of Orla during the 2018 financial year and are not expected to have a material effect during the 2019 financial year.

 

As noted above, the Board has established an Environmental, Health and Safety Committee which is responsible for all technical matters particularly as they apply to environmental, health and safety concerns, assessing environmental risks and the Company’s risk management thereof.

 

The Company strives to actively engage and make positive contributions in the communities where it currently operates. In Panama, the Company has an active community relations program that includes provision of hot lunches to 5 to 15 year-old children studying in the 18 schools located within a 15 kilometre (“km”) radius of the Cerro Quema Project site, support for various local amateur sports teams, support for a youth orchestra in the town of Tonosi, Los Santos province, Panama, support for local fairs and cultural events, and support for specific local initiatives including the construction of a seniors’ centre in Tonosi.

 

Through agreements signed with the ejidos of San Tiburcio, San Berrendo and San Francisco, the Company provides social support, scholarships, and food to the local communities. The Company has hired a full-time community relations person for the Camino Rojo Project and is developing a community relations and social responsibility program.

 

KEY POLICIES AND COMMITTEES

 

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

 

The Board expects management to operate the business of the Company in a manner that enhances shareholder value and is consistent with the highest level of integrity. Management is expected to execute the Company’s business plan and to meet performance goals and objectives according to the highest ethical standards. To this end, the Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) for its Directors, officers, and employees. The Code also addresses such important topics as diversity and workplace bullying and harassment and states that the Company is committed to fostering a work environment of mutual respect and tolerance for diversity and will not tolerate and is dedicated to preventing bullying and harassment of any kind. Employees are required to report any violations under the Code or the Company’s corporate governance policies in accordance with the Company’s internal Whistleblower Policy (a copy of which is attached to the Code), which provides that an individual may report any concerns or complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, audit-related matters, or fraud to the Chair of the Audit Committee. Such concerns and/or complaints will be kept confidential and may be communicated anonymously if desired. Following the receipt of any complaints, the Chair of the Audit Committee shall promptly investigate each matter so reported. No complaints were received under the Whistleblower Policy in 2018. A copy of the Code is posted on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

  Page 14  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE POLICY

 

The Company has adopted a Corporate Disclosure Policy to outline the required process for the timely disclosure of all material information relating to the Company’s business, including both written and verbal disclosure, and to provide guidance and assistance to the Board of Directors, officers and employees in complying with their obligations under the provisions of securities laws and stock exchange rules to preserve the confidentiality of the Company’s non-public material information.

 

INSIDER TRADING POLICY

 

The Company has adopted an Insider Trading Policy. Canadian securities laws and regulations prohibit “insider trading” and impose restrictions on trading securities while in possession of material undisclosed information. The rules and procedures detailed in the Company’s Insider Trading Policy have been implemented in order to prevent improper trading of the Company’s securities or of companies with which the Company may have a business relationship.

 

SHARE OWNERSHIP POLICY

 

The Company has adopted a Share Ownership Policy in order to align the interests of the officers and Directors of the Company with those of the Company’s shareholders by requiring such persons to own a significant number of Common Shares. Each of the non-executive Directors is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least three times the value of the annual base retainer. Each of the executive officers is required to hold Common Shares having a value of at least two times his or her base salary. The ownership guidelines will be deemed to be satisfied following the date on which the price paid by the Director or officer for Common Shares or the fair market value of the Common Shares equals or exceeds the ownership threshold. Individuals are required to comply with this policy by the fifth anniversary of the date of the individual’s date of hire or appointment.

 

CLAWBACK POLICY

 

The Company has adopted a Clawback Policy in order to maintain a culture of focused, diligent, and responsible management which discourages conduct detrimental to the growth of the Company and to ensure that incentive-based compensation paid by the Company is based upon accurate financial data. The Clawback Policy applies in the event of a material restatement of the Company’s financial results as a result of material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements.

 

ANTI-HEDGING POLICY

 

The Company has adopted a formal Anti-Hedging Policy, the objective of which is to prohibit those subject to it from directly or indirectly engaging in hedging against future declines in the market value of any securities of the Company through the purchase of financial instruments designed to offset such risk. The Board believes that it is inappropriate for Directors, officers or employees of the Company or its respective subsidiary entities or, to the extent practicable, any other person (or their associates) in a special relationship with the Company, to hedge or monetize transactions to lock in the value of holdings in the securities of the Company. Such transactions, while allowing the holder to own the Company’s securities without the full risks and rewards of ownership, potentially separate the holder’s interests from those of other stakeholders and, particularly in the case of equity securities, from the public shareholders of the Company.

 

MAJORITY VOTING POLICY

 

The Company has adopted a Majority Voting Policy prepared in accordance with TSX majority voting requirements with respect to the annual election of Directors.

 

DIVERSITY POLICY

 

The Company is committed to creating and maintaining a culture of workplace diversity. In keeping with this commitment, the Company has established a Diversity Policy. “Diversity” is any dimension which can be used to differentiate groups and people from one another, and it means the respect for and appreciation of the differences in gender, age, ethnic origin, religion, education, sexual orientation, political belief, or disability, amongst other things. The Company recognizes the benefits arising from employee and Board diversity, including a broader pool of high-quality employees, improving employee retention, accessing different perspectives and ideas, and benefiting from all available talent. The Company respects and values the perspectives, experiences, cultures, and differences that employees possess.

 

  Page 15  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICY

 

The Company is always committed to conducting its business in a responsible manner. In keeping with this commitment, Orla has implemented a Corporate Social Responsibility Policy which sets out the guidelines by which the Company will (i) endeavour to respect the health and safety of its employees, (ii) protect the environment, (iii) respect the human rights of its employees and the residents in the communities in which the Company operates and (iv) contribute to the sustainable development of those communities.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL, SUSTAINABILITY AND HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY

 

The Company is committed to meeting or surpassing regulatory requirements in all its exploration and development activities while working to protect the environment both within and beyond the Company’s operational boundaries. In keeping with this commitment, Orla has adopted an Environmental, Sustainability and Health and Safety Policy. The Company will conduct all its operations in a manner that ensures full compliance with its Environmental, Sustainability and Health and Safety Policy, applicable legislation, and government requirements. The aim of this policy is to protect the surroundings in which the Company operates, to minimize and manage environmental risk and to enhance sustainable environmental practices. Orla will ensure that all its activities are conducted in an environmentally safe and responsible manner and will ensure that its contractors adhere to the same high environmental standards.

 

MANDATE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The Board discharges its responsibility for overseeing the management of the Company’s business by delegating to the Company’s senior officers the responsibility for day-to-day management of the Company. The Board discharges its responsibilities both directly and through its standing committees; namely, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Environmental, Health and Safety Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. In order to clearly define its primary roles and responsibilities, the Board has adopted a Mandate of the Board of Directors.

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

The primary functions of the Company’s Audit Committee are to provide independent review and oversight of the Company’s financial reporting process, the system of internal control and management of financial risks, and the audit process, including the selection, oversight, and compensation of the Company’s external auditors. The Audit Committee also assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities in reviewing the Company’s process for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and its own Code. For further information, please refer to the section below in this AIF entitled “AUDIT COMMITTEE”.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEE

 

The purpose of the Environmental, Health and Safety Committee is to monitor and review the health, safety, environmental and sustainable development policies, principles, practices, and processes of the Company and monitor and review the regulatory issues related to health, safety, the environment, and sustainable development. The Environmental, Health and Safety Committee has the authority to engage independent counsel or other experts and conduct any investigation that it considers appropriate. It is responsible for amongst other things, reviewing and approving annual disclosure relating to the Company’s sustainability, health, safety and environment policies and activities, reviewing sustainability, environmental and health and safety reports and identifying the principal health, safety and environmental risks and impacts of the Company.

 

  Page 16  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

 

The Compensation Committee has adopted a written mandate and is responsible for the review and approval of the philosophy and design of the Company’s compensation programs and the compensation of the Company’s executives and members of the Board and for submitting recommendations to the Board in this regard. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board, as appropriate, in connection with the Company’s succession planning with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executive officers and ensuring that the structure, design and application of the Company’s material compensation programs meet the Company’s principles, objectives and risk profile and do not encourage excessive risk taking.

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE

 

The Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is in place to provide a focus on governance that will enhance the Company’s performance, to assess and make recommendations regarding the Board of Directors effectiveness and to establish and lead the process for identifying, recruiting, appointing, re-appointing, evaluating, and providing ongoing development for Directors.

 

The mandates/terms of reference for each of the Board, Environmental, Health and Safety Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee as well as the Code and all of the aforementioned policies are available on the Company’s website at www.orlamining.com. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is attached to this AIF as Schedule “A”.

 

REORGANIZATIONS

 

Other than the Arrangement, there have been no material reorganizations of the Company or any of its subsidiaries within the three most recently completed financial years or during or proposed for the current financial year.

 

  Page 17  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

MINERAL PROJECTS

 

THE CAMINO ROJO PROJECT

 

The following disclosure relating to the Camino Rojo Project has been derived, in part, from the independent technical report for the Camino Rojo Project titled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019 (the PEA or, as previously defined in this AIF, the “Amended Camino Rojo Report”) prepared by Carl E. Defilippi, RM, SME of Kappes, Cassiday and Associates (“KCA”), Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. of Resource Geosciences Incorporated (“RGI”) and Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM of Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. (“IMC”). The Amended Camino Rojo Report is available for review under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

The PEA with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is preliminary in nature and include the use of Inferred Mineral Resources, which are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves and there is no certainty that preliminary economic assessment results will be realized. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

 

Project Description, Location and Access

 

The Camino Rojo Project is a gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit located in the Municipality of Mazapil, State of Zacatecas, near the village of San Tiburcio. The project lies 190 km northeast of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km south-southwest of the town of Concepcion del Oro, Zacatecas, and 54 km south-southeast of Goldcorp’s Peñasquito Mine. The Camino Rojo Project area is centered at approximately 244150E 2675900N UTM NAD27 Zone 14N.

 

Both Monterrey and Zacatecas have airports with regularly scheduled flights south to Mexico City or north to the USA. There are numerous gravel roads within the property linking the surrounding countryside with the two highways, Highways 54 and 62, which transect the property. In addition, there is a railway approximately 40 km east of San Tiburcio which crosses both highways. There are very few locations within the property that are not readily accessible by four-wheel drive vehicles.

 

All minerals rights in Mexico are the property of the government of Mexico and may be exploited by private entities under concessions granted by the Mexican federal government. Under current Mexican mining law, amended 29 April 2005, the Direccion General de Minas (“DGM”) grants concessions for a period of 50 years, provided the concession is maintained in good standing. There is no distinction between mineral exploration and exploitation concessions. As part of the requirements to maintain a concession in good standing, bi-annual fees must be paid based upon a per-hectare escalating fee, work expenditures must be incurred in amounts determined based on concession size and age, and applicable environmental regulations must be respected. The Camino Rojo Project consists of eight concessions held by a subsidiary of Orla (Minera Camino Rojo) covering in aggregate 205,936.867 ha, with one concession expiring in 2057 and the remaining seven expiring in 2058.

 

Pursuant to the acquisition of the Camino Rojo Project by Orla, Goldcorp was granted a 2% NSR on all metal production from the Camino Rojo Project, except for metals produced under the sulphide joint venture option stipulated in the Camino Agreement. Orla is the operator of the Camino Rojo Project and has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. If a sulphide project is defined through a positive pre-feasibility study outlining one of the development scenarios A or B below, Goldcorp may, at its option, enter into a joint venture for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of the sulphide project.

 

· Scenario A: A sulphide project where ore from Camino Rojo is processed using the existing infrastructure of the Peñasquito Mine, Mill and Concentrator facilities. In such circumstances, the sulphide project would be operated by Goldcorp, who would earn a 70% interest in the sulphide project, with Orla owning 30%.

 

  Page 18  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

· Scenario B: A standalone sulphide project with a mine plan containing at least 500 million tonnes of Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves using standalone facilities not associated with Peñasquito. Under this scenario, the sulphide project would be operated by Goldcorp, who would earn a 60% interest in the sulphide project, with Orla owning 40%.

 

Following exercise of its option, if Goldcorp elects to sell its portion of the sulphide project, in whole or in part, then Orla would retain a right of first refusal on the sale of the sulphide project. Orla will retain a right of first refusal on Goldcorp’s NSR, Goldcorp’s portion of the sulphide project, following the exercise of its option, and certain claims retained by Goldcorp. Carry forward of assessment work credits will be applied to the Camino Rojo Project concessions thus no expenditures are immediately required to meet assessment work requirements.

 

Surface rights in the project area are owned by several Ejidos, which are Federally defined agrarian communities and private landowners. The land overlying the Mineral Resource at Camino Rojo, is controlled by the San Tiburcio Ejido, comprised of 400 voting members who collectively control 37,154 ha. Exploration work at the Camino Rojo Project has been carried out under the terms of surface access agreements negotiated with the San Tiburcio Ejido.

 

Camino Rojo SA de CV (a Goldcorp subsidiary) executed three agreements with the San Tiburcio Ejido that cover the Camino Rojo deposit. Camino Rojo SA de CV subsequently passed the rights and obligations of these agreements to Minera Peñasquito SA de CV (a Goldcorp subsidiary), who subsequently transferred the rights and obligations to Minera Camino Rojo.

 

The three agreements were executed with the San Tiburcio Ejido on February 26, 2013. A Temporary Occupation with Right to Expropriate Agreement (“COPE”) covers all the area of the resource and area of development proposed in the Amended Camino Rojo Report. It has a 30-year term with the right to extend at the end of this period. A Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement (“CSRA”) stipulates that Camino Rojo SA de CV will contribute 12,000,000 Pesos annually to the San Tiburcio Ejido to be used to promote and execute diverse social and economic development programs to benefit the San Tiburcio Ejido. Additionally, at its discretion, Camino Rojo SA de CV will provide support for adult education, career training, business development assistance, and cultural programs, and scholastic scholarships. The CSRA agreement expires when exploration or exploitation activities at the Camino Rojo Project end and is valid and remains in effect until mine closure or project cancellation. Annual payments are due on the 29th of July each year. A Temporary Occupation Agreement (“COT”) with respect to exploration over a five year period was executed for some areas of exploration outside the COPE. This agreement expired in February 2018. The Company signed a new COT with the San Tiburcio Ejido on October 21, 2018 covering an area of 5,850 ha for a 5-year period requiring annual payments of 5 million pesos.

 

Camino Rojo SA de CV executed a surface rights agreement dated December 22, 2014, expiring December 21, 2019, with the Ejido San Francisco de los Quijano. This agreement is a COT allowing exploration activities on 7,666 ha. Simultaneously with the execution of this COT, Camino Rojo SA de CV executed a CSRA with the Ejido San Francisco de los Quijano, also expiring December 21, 2019, which obligates Camino Rojo SA de CV to: provide 19,000 Pesos in monthly scholastic scholarships to the Ejido San Francisco de los Quijano; complete electrification of a water well and rehabilitate/reconstruct the community cistern; assist Ejido San Francisco de los Quijano members with finding appropriate employment opportunities with Camino Rojo SA de CV and its contractors; and to provide basic food rations to community members in need.

 

Camino Rojo SA de CV executed a surface rights agreement with the Ejido El Berrendo. This agreement, executed on December 22, 2014, expired on December 21, 2017, was a COT that allowed Camino Rojo SA de CV to conduct exploration activities on 4,201 ha. Minera Camino Rojo signed a new COT with Ejido El Berrendo on March 4, 2019 that covers 2,631 ha for a 5-year period. This COT requires annual payments of 2,284,786 pesos.

 

Simultaneously with the execution of the COT in 2014, Camino Rojo SA de CV executed a CSRA with the Ejido El Berrendo which obligates Camino Rojo SA de CV to: provide 26,000 Pesos in monthly scholastic scholarships to the Ejido El Berrendo; complete electrification of the Ejido El Berrendo community building; rehabilitate Ejido El Berrendo roads; provide materials needed for construction of a community health center; water well and rehabilitate/reconstruct the community cistern; assist Ejido El Berrendo members with finding appropriate employment opportunities with Camino Rojo SA de CV and its contractors; and to provide basic food rations to community members in need. The agreement also expired on December 21, 2017. Minera Camino Rojo has not signed a new CSRA with the Ejido El Berrendo but is abiding by the terms of the previous CSRA.

 

 

  Page 19  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

No environmental liabilities are apparent on the property. Prior operators have been compliant with Mexican environmental regulations and, conditional upon continued compliance, permits for normal exploration activities are expected to be readily attainable.

 

The chief project risk identified by previous operators is that of a possible Federal designation of a protected biological-ecological reserve that could affect the project. SEMARNAT published a public notice in the Official Gazette of the Federation requesting public consultation and comments on the possible designation of an area known as “Zacatecas Semiarid Desert” as a Natural Protected Area (“ANP”). If a designation of this ANP by the government includes the surface of the mining concession areas or ancillary work areas such as possible water well fields of the Camino Rojo Project, this could limit the growth and continuity of the project. ANPs are generally divided into sub-zones in which the execution of different activities are allowed or prohibited in accordance with the sub-zone’s characteristics. Mining activities (including both exploration and exploitation), depending on the corresponding sub-zone may be carried out provided they are authorized by the National Commission on Protected Natural Areas, without prejudice of other authorizations required for their execution. Goldcorp engaged in forums with government and community stakeholders and submitted an official opinion regarding this ANP declaration to the government, with the objective of ensuring that if an ANP was created, the Camino Rojo Project would not be restricted from development. Since the time that the idea of creating an ANP was first proposed, there has been no formal movement on the proposal. The State government has opposed the declaration of an ANP in the region.

 

History

 

The Camino Rojo Project was discovered in mid-2007 by geologists working under contract to Canplats Resource Corporation (“Canplats”). Following a rapid program of surface pitting and trenching for geochemical samples, Canplats began concurrent programs of surface geophysics (resistivity and induced potential) and RC drilling in late 2007, which continued into 2008. Core drilling began in 2008. The geophysical survey defined two principal areas of high chargeability, one centered on the Represa zone and another one km to the west named the Don Julio zone, which were interpreted as large volumes of sulphide mineralized rocks. Drilling by Canplats, and later by Goldcorp, confirmed the presence of extensive sulphide mineralization at depth in the Represa zone, and much lower quantities of sulphide minerals at Don Julio.

 

By August of 2008, Canplats drilled a total of 92 RC, and 30 diamond-core holes, for a total of 23,988 metres and 16,044 metres respectively, mainly focused in the Represa zone.

 

The surface access and permission to continue drilling were cancelled in early August 2008, by the Ejido of San Tiburcio, Zacatecas. Nevertheless, in November 2008, Canplats published an independent Mineral Resource estimate for the Represa zone. In October 2009, Canplats publicly released a PEA on the project, which is historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The conclusions and recommendations of the historical Canplats assessment do not form the basis for the recommendations contained in the Amended Camino Rojo Report.

 

Canplats was acquired by Goldcorp in early 2010. Validation, infill, condemnation, and expansion drilling began in January 2011. By the end of 2015, a total of 279,788 metres of new core drilling in 415 drill holes and 20,569 metres of new RC drilling in 96 drill holes was completed in the Represa and Don Julio zones and immediate surroundings. An additional 31,286 metres of shallow RAB-style, RC drilling in 306 drill holes was completed, with most of the RAB drilling testing other exploration targets within the concession. Airborne gravity, magnetic and TEM surveys were also carried out, the results of which are in the archives of Minera Camino Rojo.

 

As of the end of 2015, a total of 295,832 metres in 445 diamond core holes, 44,557 metres in 188 RC drill holes, and 31,286 metres of RAB drilling had been completed.

 

  Page 20  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource tabulations for the Camino Rojo Project were publicly disclosed by Goldcorp. The Amended Camino Rojo Report summarizes these tabulations, but as the report includes a new Mineral Resource estimate, the Goldcorp numbers are no longer considered relevant.

 

Orla acquired the project from Goldcorp in 2017 and, through the effective date of the original Camino Rojo Report (June 19, 2018), had completed approximately 1,850 metres of additional drilling in ten diamond core holes for metallurgical sampling and 1,900 metres of drilling in six reverse-circulation (“RC”) holes testing for water.

 

There has been no recorded mineral production from the Camino Rojo Project.

 

A current Mineral Resource for the Camino Rojo Project is detailed below under the heading Mineral Resource Estimates.

 

Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit Types

 

Regional, Local and Property Geology

 

The Camino Rojo Project deposit is located beneath a broad pediment of Tertiary and Quaternary alluvium along the boundary between the Mesa Central physiographic province and the Sierra Madre Oriental fold and thrust belt near the pre-Laramide continental-margin. Oldest rocks are Triassic metamorphic continental rocks overlain by Early to Middle Jurassic red beds. Upper Jurassic to Upper Cretaceous marine facies rocks overlie the red beds at a disconformity and comprise a package of shelf carbonate rocks comprising the Zuloaga to Cuesta del Cura Formations and the basin-filling flysch sediments of the Indidura and Caracol Formations. The deposit lies within the southern extent of the northwest striking San Tiburcio fault zone.

 

Camino Rojo is a gold-silver-zinc-lead deposit concealed below shallow (<1 metre to 3 metres) alluvial cover in a large pediment along the southwest border of the Sierra Madre Oriental. Small water storage pits and trenches expose a portion of the oxide deposit in the discovery area known as Represa zone. The Late Cretaceous Caracol Formation is the primary mineralization host, and at depth, the upper Indidura Formation is a minor mineralization host along the Caracol contact.

 

The gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit is situated above, and extends down into, a zone of feldspathic hornfels developed in the sedimentary strata, and variably mineralized dacitic dikes. The mineralized zones correspond to zones of sheeted sulfidic veins and veinlet networks, creating a bulk-mineable style of gold mineralization. Skarn mineralization has been encountered in the deeper portions of the system. The observed geologic and geochemical characteristics of the gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit at Camino Rojo are consistent with those of a distal oxidized gold skarn deposit. The metal suite and style of mineralization at Camino Rojo are similar to the intrusion-related deposits in the Caracol Formation and underlying carbonate rocks adjacent to the diatremes at Peñasquito.

 

Mineralization styles in the region include polymetallic and copper-gold skarn and limestone manto (replacement) silver-lead-zinc sulphide ores in the Concepcion del Oro District, 50 km north of Camino Rojo Project, and gold-silver-lead-zinc mineralized igneous diatreme-breccia, and sulphide-sulfosalt-carbonate veinlets and fracture fillings in the Caracol Formation at the Peñasquito mine.

 

Mineralized Zones

 

The Camino Rojo Project comprises intrusive related, clastic sedimentary strata hosted polymetallic gold, silver, arsenic, zinc, and lead mineralization.

 

Three stages of mineralization have been observed in the Camino Rojo deposit, and two types of high-grade material. At hand specimen scale, mineralization is controlled by bedding and fractures. The sandy and silty beds of the turbidite sequences of the Caracol Formation are preferentially mineralized, with pyrite disseminations and semi-massive stringers hosted within them, presumably due to higher porosity and permeability relative to the enclosing shale beds. Basal layers of the turbiditic sandstone beds are often preferentially mineralized. Bedding discordant open space filling fractures and structurally controlled breccia zones host banded sulphide veins and sulphide matrix breccias. Higher grade vein and breccia zones are localized along the margins of dikes of intermediate composition. Dr.  Gray observed mineralization in drill core over vertical intervals greater than 400 metres, with mineralization occurring in a broad NE-SW trending elongate zone as much as 300 metres wide and 700 metres long.

 

  Page 21  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Oxidation was observed to range from complete oxidation in the uppermost portions of the deposit, generally underlain or surrounded by a zone of mixed oxide and sulphide mineralization where oxidation is complete along fracture zones and within permeable strata, but lacking in the remainder of the rock, which then is generally underlain by a sulphide zone in which no oxidation is observed. Oxidation of the deposit is approximately 100%, extending from surface to depths of 100 metres to 150 metres. The underlying transitional zone of mixed oxide/sulphide extends over a vertical interval in excess of 100 metres and is characterized by partial oxidation controlled by bedding and structures. The sandy layers of the turbiditic sequence are preferentially oxidized, creating a stratigraphically interlayered sequence of oxide and sulphide material at the cm scale, with oxidation along structures affecting all strata. The partial oxidation of the Caracol Formation preferentially oxidizes the mineralized strata thus incomplete oxidation in the transition zone may result in nearly complete oxidation of the gold bearing portion of the rock, thus the metallurgical characteristics of mixed oxide/sulphide may vary greatly, with some material exhibiting characteristics similar to oxide material.

 

The distribution of mineralization at Camino Rojo Project is controlled by both primary bedding and discordant structures. Near surface oxidation extends to depths in excess of 100 metres and extends to greater depths along structurally controlled zones of fracturing and permeability.

 

Deposit Types

 

The observed geologic and geochemical characteristics of the gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit are consistent with those of a distal oxidized gold skarn deposit. The near surface portion of the Camino Rojo deposit has characteristics consistent with those of the distal skarn zone, transitional to epithermal mineralization, and overlies garnet bearing skarn mineralization encountered in the deeper portions of the system. Skarn deposits often exhibit predictable patterns of mineral zoning and metal zoning. Application of skarn zoning models to exploration allows for inferences about the possible lateral and depth extents of the mineralized system at the Camino Rojo deposit and can be used to guide further exploration drill programs.

 

Exploration

 

The Camino Rojo Technical Report summarizes exploration efforts by Orla through the effective date of the original Camino Rojo Report (June 19, 2018). For information on exploration activities subsequent to this date, the reader is referred to the “Outlook and Future Plans” section on page 33 of this AIF.

 

With the PEA of an open pit mine and heap leach extraction facility based on oxide and transitional material now complete, the Company has commenced feasibility work. Completion of this work is anticipated in the first half of 2019.

 

Environmental baseline and assessment activities for permitting have been initiated.

 

A Community and Social Responsibility (“CSR”) program was started in November of 2017 and activities are ongoing.

 

Exploration work to evaluate previously identified targets and develop new targets for gold and silver mineralization on the large land position started in early 2018. Extensive overburden cover hinders exploration. But as the mineralization previously discovered on the property demonstrates, shallow cover can mask extensive near-surface mineralization. Prospective targets will be geologically mapped, sampled and potentially trenched. On targets where initial work is positive, drilling will be planned.

 

As of June 19, 2018, three holes for the pit-wall geotechnical studies had been completed. Two reconnaissance-style Induced Polarization (“IP”) grids with 400 metre spaced lines were completed over the area of the current deposit and to the west.

 

  Page 22  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

A small orientation soil survey had been conducted over the resource area. A 2,200 metre HQ core drill program to obtain samples for additional metallurgical studies was underway, as was a 3,000 metre RC drill program testing for potential water well locations. Orla has not yet conducted any drilling to explore for new mineralized zones. Orla completed approximately 1,850 metres of additional drilling in 10 diamond core holes for metallurgical sampling and 1,900 metres of drilling in six RC holes testing for water. In addition, approximately 100 line-km of IP geophysical survey had been completed and 325 rock and soil samples had been collected.

 

Regional exploration continues to field check interpreted targets, consisting of coincident historic geochemical, airborne geophysical and satellite imagery anomalies. Although several areas of alteration and iron oxide-carbonate veining have been observed, no significant sample results have been returned to date. Results from the orientation soil survey over the known deposit area to test for any characteristic signature indicates the geochemical “halo” over the deposit is tightly restricted to sub/outcrop. Anomalous gold (>0.2 grams per tonne) (“g/t”) is most closely associated with elevated arsenic (>100 ppm) and zinc (>300 ppm).

 

Drilling

 

Prior operators Canplats and Goldcorp conducted extensive drill campaigns at the Camino Rojo Project, totaling 371,675 metres in 939 RC, RAB, and diamond core holes, as discussed above. The Canplats drilling discovered and partially delineated the oxide mineral deposit that occurs at the northeast end of the Camino Rojo deposit in the Represa zone. The drilling also discovered the deeper sulphide deposit to the southwest in the Don Julio zone. The data was used to develop a Mineral Resource and PEA level study for the Represa zone by Canplats during 2009. The Goldcorp drilling further delineated both the oxide and sulphide mineral resources. The oxide portion of the deposit has sufficient drilling to conduct studies at the feasibility study level and the sulphide deposit has sufficient drilling to conduct studies at the PEA or preliminary feasibility level of study. The Amended Camino Rojo Report concludes that the drilling and sampling procedures for the Camino Rojo drill samples are reasonable and adequate and there do not appear to be any drilling, sampling or recovery factors which would materially impact the reliability of the results.

 

As of the effective date of the original Camino Rojo Report (June 19, 2018), Orla had completed approximately 1,850 metres of additional drilling in 10 diamond core holes for metallurgical sampling and 1,900 metres of drilling in six RC holes testing for water. There are no drill results in the Amended Camino Rojo Report with respect to the drilling conducted by Orla.

 

Sampling, Analysis, and Data Verification

 

Sampling and analysis were supervised by the geological staff of Canplats for 2007 and 2008 drilling and by Goldcorp for 2011 through 2014 drilling. ALS Chemex was the primary assay laboratory used for the routine assaying of surface and drill samples for both the Canplats and Goldcorp drilling/sampling programs. All the assays were done at the ALS Chemex laboratory in North Vancouver, British Columbia, certified under ISO 9001: 2000, and 2008, and accredited under ISO 17025:2005. The Canplats samples were prepared for assaying at the ALS Chemex sample preparation laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico. Most of the Goldcorp samples were prepared at the ALS Chemex sample preparation laboratory in Zacatecas, Mexico. However, during 2013 and 2014 samples were also sent to the ALS Chihuahua facility and the ALS Guadalajara preparation lab as well as Zacatecas facility. Upon receipt at the sample preparation labs the samples were dried, crushed in their entirety to >70% passing a 6 millimetre (“mm”) screen. The crushed material was riffle split to extract an approximate 250 gram sub-sample that was pulverized to >85% passing 75 microns in a disc pulverizer. This sample preparation procedure is the standard ALS Chemex “PREP-31” procedure. Each of the 250 gram pulps were riffle split into two sealed paper sample envelopes, with one split air-shipped to the ALS Chemex assay facility in North Vancouver. The second split was returned to the property for storage. The same sample preparation procedure was used for core and RC chips. ALS Chemex is independent of each of Canplats and Goldcorp.

 

  Page 23  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The core and RC samples collected by Canplats and Goldcorp, as well as the surface pit and trench samples collected by Canplats, were assayed with the same analytical methods and at the same laboratory, the ALS Chemex facility in North Vancouver, British Columbia. For gold, all were assayed using the Au-AA23 30 gram fire assay fusion, with Atomic Absorption finish. A total of 33 other elements were determined four-acid sample digestion followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES). This is ALS Chemex method code ME-ICP61. Over-limits for gold were automatically re-assayed with 30-gram fire assay fusion with gravimetric finish (method code Au-GRA21). Over-limits for silver, copper, lead, and zinc were automatically performed by four acid digestion of the sample followed by analysis by ICP-AES. This is ALS Chemex method code ME-OG62 for material grade samples. RAB-style RC samples from 2011 to 2014 were analyzed at ALS Chemex using method code ME-MS61m, which employs the same four-acid digestion, and a combination of Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (“ICP-AES”), mass-spectrometry, and cold-vapor Atomic Absorption to determine 48 elements plus mercury. Most of the RAB holes are peripheral to the main deposit area.

 

The Amended Camino Rojo Report concludes that the historical sample preparation, analysis, quality assurance/quality control (“QA/QC”) programs and sample security measures conducted by Canplats and Goldcorp as more fully described in the Camino Rojo Report were reasonable and adequate to ensure the reliability of the drilling database and that the Goldcorp QA/QC program met or exceeded industry standards.

 

The sampling data used for the Mineral Resource in the Amended Camino Rojo Report was verified by IMC. A substantial portion of the database was compared with original assay certificates. There were no limitations on the verification process and IMC concluded that the database assay values and the drill hole database are reliable and acceptable for the purposes of the PEA, prefeasibility and feasibility level studies.

 

Rock samples from Orla’s recent exploration program are sent to the ALS Minerals (“ALS”) sample preparation facility in Zacatecas, Mexico. Sample analysis is performed in the ALS laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia. All gold results are obtained by ALS using fire assay fusion and an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish (Au-AA23). All samples are also analyzed for multi-elements, including silver and copper, using an Aqua Regia (ME-ICP41).

 

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

 

Metallurgical test work programs on the Camino Rojo Project were commissioned by the prior operators of the project, Canplats and Goldcorp. No metallurgical studies have been conducted by Orla as at the date of the original Camino Rojo Report (June 19, 2018).

 

Based on the metallurgical data available, the Camino Rojo deposit shows significant variability in gold recoveries based on material type and geological domain with preg-robbing organic carbon being the only significant deleterious element identified. In general, recoveries for gold and silver are good and will yield acceptable results using conventional heap leaching methods with cyanide. Key design parameters from the metallurgical test work are summarized below:

 

· Crush size of 80% passing 38 mm.

· Estimated gold recoveries (including 2% field deduction) of 70%, 58%, 60% and 49% for Kp Oxide, Ki Oxide, Transition-hi and Transition-lo materials, respectively.

· Estimated silver recoveries (including 3% field deduction) of 13%, 20%, 17% and 20% for Kp Oxide, Ki Oxide, Transition-hi and Transition-lo materials, respectively.

· Design leach cycle of 80 days.

· Average cyanide consumption of 0.35 kg/t material.

· Average lime consumption of 1.25 kg/t material.

 

Additional column leach tests should be conducted to confirm recoveries at coarser crush sizes, especially for the Ki material type which has very little data available, to mitigate any associated risk.

 

  Page 24  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Mineral Resource Estimates

 

The Mineral Resource in the Amended Camino Rojo Report includes potential mill resources and the potential heap leach resources, which are oxide dominant and are the emphasis of the Amended Camino Rojo Report. The Mineral Resource is based on a block model developed by IMC during March and April 2018.

 

For the leach resource, Measured Mineral Resources and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 100.8 million tonnes at 0.734 g/t gold, 12.67 g/t silver, 0.21% lead, and 0.37% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 2.38 million ounces gold, 41.1 million ounces of silver, 455.8 million pounds of lead, and 814.8 million pounds of zinc. The Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 4.9 million tonnes at 0.772 g/t gold, 5.60 g/t silver, 0.07% lead, and 0.24% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 120,600 ounces of gold, 874,000 ounces of silver, 7.0 million pounds of lead, and 25.9 million pounds of zinc for the Inferred Mineral Resource.

 

For the mill resource, Measured Mineral Resources and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 254.1 million tonnes at 0.889 g/t gold, 7.50 g/t silver, 0.07% lead, and 0.26% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 7.3 million ounces gold, 61.3 million ounces of silver, 402.0 million pounds of lead, and 1.46 billion pounds of zinc. The Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 60.3 million tonnes at 0.875 g/t gold, 7.90 g/t silver, 0.05% lead, and 0.23% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 1.7 million ounces of gold, 15.3 million ounces of silver, 68.1 million pounds of lead, and 310.8 million pounds of zinc for the Inferred Mineral Resource.

 

Total Measured Mineral Resources and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 354.9 million tonnes at 0.845 g/t gold, 8.97 g/t silver, 0.11% lead, and 0.29% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 9.6 million ounces gold, 102.4 million ounces of silver, 857.8 million pounds of lead, and 2.27 billion pounds of zinc. The total Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 65.2 million tonnes at 0.867 g/t gold, 7.73 g/t silver, 0.05% lead, and 0.23% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 1.8 million ounces of gold, 16.2 million ounces of silver, 75.2 million pounds of lead, and 336.8 million pounds of zinc for the total Inferred Mineral Resource.

 

The below table presents a summary of the Mineral Resource at Camino Rojo:

 

Mineral Resource Type   NSR Cutoff Grade (US$/t)     Kt     NSR (US$/t)     Gold
(g/t)
    Silver
(g/t)
    Lead (%)     Zinc (%)     Gold (koz)     Silver (koz)     Lead (mlb)     Zinc (mlb)  
Leach Resource:
Measured     5.06       16,147       23.65       0.794       15.44       0.26       0.39       412.1       8,014       92.1       140.6  
Indicated     5.06       84,692       20.07       0.734       12.15       0.19       0.36       1.969.3       33,076       363.7       674.3  
Total M&I:     5.06       100,839       20.64       0.734       12.67       0.21       0.37       2,381.3       41,091       455.8       814.8  
Inferred     5.06       4,858       18.13       0.772       5.60       0.07       0.24       120.6       874       7.0       25.9  
Mill Resource:
Measured     13.72       9,818       39.27       0.864       7.45       0.08       0.28       272.6       2,352       16.4       60.1  
Indicated     13.72       244,251       39.98       0.890       7.50       0.07       0.26       6,992.2       58,934       385.6       1,398.2  
Total M&I:     13.72       254,069       39.95       0.889       7.50       0.07       0.26       7,264.8       61,286       402.0       1,458.3  
Inferred     13.72       60,342       39.04       0.875       7.90       0.05       0.23       1,696.9       15,334       68.1       310.8  
TOTAL MINERAL RESOURCE:
Measured             25,965       29.55       0.820       12.42       0.19       0.35       684.6       10,367       108.5       200.7  
Indicated             328,943       34.86       0.847       8.70       0.10       0.29       8,961.5       92,010       749.3       2,072.5  
Total M&I             354,908       34.47       0.845       8.97       0.11       0.29       9,646.1       102,377       857.8       2,273.2  
Inferred             65,200       37.49       0.867       7.73       0.05       0.23       1,817.5       16,208       75.2       336.8  

 

Page 25

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Notes:

 

(1) The Mineral Resource is effective as of April 27, 2018.

(2) Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding.

(3) Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

(4) Mineral Resources for leach material are based on prices of US$1,400/oz gold and US$20/oz silver.

(5) Mineral Resources for mill material are based on prices of US$1,400/oz gold, US$20/oz silver, US$1.05/lb lead, and US$1.25/lb zinc.

(6) Mineral Resources are based on NSR cut-off grades of US$5.06/t for leach material and US$13.72/t for mill material.

(7) NSR value for leach material is as follows:

Kp Oxide: NSR (US$/t) = 30.77 x gold (g/t) + 0.080 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 70% and silver recovery of 13%

Ki Oxide: NSR (US$/t) = 25.49 x gold (g/t) + 0.123 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 58% and silver recovery of 20%

Tran-Hi: NSR (US$/t) = 26.37 x gold (g/t) + 0.104 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 60% and silver recovery of 17%

Tran-Lo: NSR (US$/t) = 21.54 x gold (g/t) + 0.123 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 49% and silver recovery of 20%.

(8) NSR value for mill material is 36.75 x gold (g/t) + 0.429 x silver (g/t) + 10.75 x lead (%) + 12.37 x zinc (%), based on recoveries of 86% gold, 76% silver, 60% lead, and 64% zinc.

(9) Kt = 1,000 tonnes; koz = 1,000 troy ounces; mlb = million pounds (imperial); t = tonne (1,000 kilograms).

 

The Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto land held by the Adjacent Owner. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner.

 

There are certain risks associated with the Mineral Resource estimate that investors should be aware of, as follows:

 

The Camino Rojo Project Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the Company can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Company.

 

All the mineralization comprised in the Mineral Resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by the Adjacent Owner and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the Mineral Resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement with the Adjacent Owner would affect the development of a significant portion of the Mineral Resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the PEA, by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full Mineral Resource. There can be no assurance that Orla will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to Orla or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted. The PEA was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the PEA.

 

Page 26

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Mineral Resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions.

 

The estimation of Mineral Resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. In particular, the estimation of Mineral Resources for the Camino Rojo Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the Mineral Resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached. Although all mineralization included in the Company’s Mineral Resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the Mineral Resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in Mineral Resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

See “Risk Factors – The Camino Rojo Project Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the Company can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Company” and “Risk Factors - Mineral Resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions”.

 

The Amended Camino Rojo Report does not report Mineral Reserves. Additional studies at the pre-feasibility or feasibility study level will be required to establish Mineral Reserves at the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Mining Operations (Mining Methods)

 

The Camino Rojo mine will be a conventional open pit mine. Mine operations will consist of drilling medium diameter blast holes (approximately 17 cm), blasting with either explosive slurries or ammonium nitrate/fuel oil (“ANFO”) depending on water conditions, and loading into large off-road trucks with hydraulic shovels and wheel loaders. Resource will be delivered to the primary crusher and waste will be delivered to the waste storage facility southeast of the pit. There will also be a low-grade stockpile facility to store marginal resource for processing at the end of commercial pit operations. There will be a fleet of track dozers, rubber tired dozers, motor graders and water trucks to maintain the working areas of the pit, waste storage areas, and haul roads. The mine is scheduled to operate two 10 hour shifts per day for 365 days per year. Due to space limitations there is only one mining phase, the final pit. The final pit design is based on the results of a floating cone analysis using the parameters discussed in the Mineral Resource estimate.

 

The mine plan is constrained by the Fresnillo concession boundary on the north side of the pit. The PEA is based on only a portion of the total Mineral Resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the PEA.

 

Processing and Recovery Operations

 

Test work results developed by KCA and others have indicated that the Camino Rojo mineral is amenable to heap leaching for the recovery of gold and silver. The material will be mined by standard open pit mining methods and crushed at a rate of 18,000 tonnes per day (“tpd”) to 80% passing 38 mm (100% passing 66 mm) using a two-stage closed crushing circuit and conveyor stacked on the leach pad in 10 metre lifts. Lime will be added to the material for pH control before being stacked and leached with a dilute sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution will flow by gravity to a pregnant solution pond before being pumped to a Merrill-Crowe plant for metal recovery. Gold and silver will be precipitated from the pregnant solution via zinc cementation. The precious metal precipitate is dewatered using filters, dried in a mercury retort to remove mercury values, and smelted to produce the final doré product. The process has been designed to process 6.57 million tonnes per year at an average processing rate of 18,000 tpd. The project has an estimated mine life of 6.6 years. Electric power will be provided by line power to all elements of the process. An event pond is included to collect contact solution from storm events. Solution collected will be returned to the process as soon as practical.

 

Page 27

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Infrastructure, Permitting and Compliance Activities

 

Existing infrastructure for the Camino Rojo Project includes a 20-person exploration camp and dirt and gravel roads throughout the project site. Internet and limited cellular communications are currently available, though these systems will need to be expanded for operations. Primary access to the project site is by the paved four-lane Mexican Highway 54 which runs along the project site. An additional 8.4 km of site roads will be constructed to allow access to all project facilities for maintenance, transportation of personnel, deliveries, and hauling of material. Power will be supplied by a 115 kVA overhead power line and distributed at 4160 V. Power will be stepped down as needed to 460 V or 110/220 V. Emergency power will be provided by two diesel-fired generators, which are sized to supply power to the process solution pumping systems and other critical process equipment. Water for operations will be provided by water wells. Average make-up water required is estimated at 112 cubic metres per hour. Project buildings will primarily be prefabricated steel buildings or concrete masonry unit buildings and include an administration building, mine truck shop, warehouse, laboratory, guard house, clinic, refinery and motor control centers.

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by the Federal agency of the Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources), known by its acronym “SEMARNAT”, which has authority over the two principal Federal permits:

 

· a Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement), known by its acronym as an “MIA” accompanied by an Estudio de Riesgo (Risk Study); and

 

· Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Used Change) permit, known by its acronym as a “CUS”, supported by an Estudio Tecnico Justificativo (Technical Justification Study).

 

Thus far exploration work at the Camino Rojo Project has been conducted under the auspices of two separate MIA permits and corresponding CUS permits. These permits allow for extensive exploration drilling but are not sufficient for mine construction or operation. In April 2018, Orla hired independent environmental permitting consultants to design and implement baseline environmental studies of the Camino Rojo Project and to work with Orla’s consultant engineers to collect the data required for obtaining a Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement) and Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Use Change) permit. The project is not located in an area with any special Federal environmental protection designation and no factors have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required Mexican Federal and State environmental permits. Properly prepared MIA and CUS applications and mine operating permits for a project that does not affect federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves can usually be approved in 12 months.

 

In April 2018, Orla commissioned independent consultants to work with Minera Camino Rojo community relations staff to assess social and community impacts of development of the Camino Rojo Project. The project has a long association with the local communities, including Community and Social Responsibility Agreements as described in the Amended Camino Rojo Report.

 

Capital and Operating Cost Estimates

 

Capital and operating costs for the process and general administration components of the Camino Rojo Project PEA were estimated by KCA. Costs for the mining components were provided by IMC. All costs are presented in first quarter 2018 US dollars. Estimated costs are considered to have an accuracy of +/-25% for capital costs and +/-20% for operating costs. The total capital cost for the Camino Rojo Project is US$153.8 million, including US$13.8 million in working capital and not including reclamation and closure costs, value added tax (“IVA”) or other taxes. All IVA is assumed to be fully refundable.

 

Page 28

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The below table presents the capital cost requirements for the Camino Rojo Project:

 

CAPITAL COST SUMMARY

 

Description   Cost (US$)  
Pre-Production Capital   $ 120,199,000  
Mining Contractor Mobilization and Preproduction   $ 4,926,000  
Total Pre-Production   $ 125,125,000  
Working Capital and Initial Fills   $ 13,789,000  
Sustaining Capital – Mine and Process   $ 14,871,000  
TOTAL (excluding IVA)   $ 153,785,000  

 

All equipment and material requirements are based on the design information described in the Amended Camino Rojo Report. Budgetary capital costs for process related components have been estimated primarily based on recent quotes from similar projects in KCA’s database and cost guide data. Where recent quotes were not available, reasonable cost estimates or allowances were made. All capital cost estimates are based on the purchase of equipment quoted new from the manufacturer or to be fabricated new.

 

The average life of mine (“LOM”) operating cost for the Camino Rojo Project is US$8.02 per tonne of material processed. The below table presents the LOM operating cost requirements for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

OPERATING COST SUMMARY

 

Description   LOM Cost (US$/t)  
Mine   $ 3.05  
Process and Support Services   $ 3.20  
Site G&A   $ 1.77  
TOTAL   $ 8.02  

 

Estimated mining operating costs are based on contract mining at US$1.81 per tonne of material moved. Process operating costs have been estimated from first principles. Labor costs were estimated using project specific staffing, salary and wage and benefit requirements. Unit consumptions of materials, supplies, power, water and delivered supply costs were also estimated. The process operating costs presented are based upon the ownership of all process production equipment and site facilities. The owner will employ and direct all operating maintenance and support personnel for all site activities. IVA is not included in the operating costs.

 

Economic Analysis

 

Based on the estimated production parameters, capital costs, and operating costs, a cash flow model was prepared for the economic analysis of the Camino Rojo Project. The project economics were evaluated using a discounted cash flow method, which measures the net present value (“NPV”) of future cash flow streams. The final economic model was developed, with input from Orla, using the following assumptions:

 

· period of analysis of nine years (includes one year of pre-production and investment, seven years of production and one year for reclamation and closure);

 

Page 29

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

· three year trailing average gold price of US$1,250/oz and silver price of US$17/oz;

 

· processing rate of 18,000 tonnes per day material;

 

· gold and silver recoveries as follows: (i) estimated gold recoveries (including 2% field deduction) of 70% for Kp Oxide, 58% for Ki Oxide, 60% for Transition-hi; and 49% for Transition-lo; and (ii) estimated silver recoveries (including 3% field deduction) of 13% for Kp Oxide, 20% for Ki Oxide, 17% for Transition-hi and 20% for Transition-lo; and

 

· capital and operating costs as summarized above (which are set forth in detail in the Amended Camino Rojo Report);

 

· 2% NSR to Goldcorp, 0.5% NSR extraordinary mining duty to the Mexican government, 7.5% special mining tax to the Mexican government plus 30% income tax to Mexican government.

 

A summary of the key economic parameters is shown in the below table:

 

Key Economic Parameters

 

Item   Value     Units  
Gold Price     1,250       US$/oz  
Silver Price     17       US$/oz  
Gold Avg.  Recovery     67       %  
Silver Avg.  Recovery     15       %  
Treatment Rate     18,000       t/d  
Refining and Transportation Cost, gold     1.40       US$/oz  
Refining and Transportation Cost, gold     1.20       US$/oz  
Payable Factor, gold     99.9       %  
Payable Factor, silver     98.0       %  
Annual Produced AuEq, Avg.     103       koz  
Income and Corporate Tax Rate     30       %  
Royalties     2.50       %  
After-Tax NPV (US$)                
i = 0%   $ 184,353,016          
i = 5%   $ 120,834,790          
i = 8%   $ 91,626,075          
i = 10%   $ 75,039,610          
i = 15%   $ 41,564,553          
IRR     24.5       %  
Mine Life     6.6       years  
Payback     3.3       years  

 

Page 30

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Economic Analysis Summary

 

Economic Analysis (US$)      
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pre-Tax     38.1 %
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax     24.5 %
Average Annual Cashflow (Pre-Tax)   $ 60 M  
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax)   $ 231 M  
Average Annual Cashflow (After-Tax)   $ 43 M  
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax)   $ 121 M  
Gold Price Assumption   $ 1,250 /ounce  
Silver Price Assumption   $ 17 /ounce  
Pay-Back Period (Rears based on After-Tax)     3.3 years  
Capital Costs (Excluding IVA) (US$)        
Initial Capital   $ 125 M  
Working Capital and Initial Fills   $ 14 M  
LOM Sustaining Capital   $ 15 M  
Operating Costs (Average LOM) (US$)        
Mining   $ 3.05 /tonne processed  
Processing and Support   $ 3.20 /tonne processed  
G&A   $ 1.77 /tonne processed  
Total Operating Cost   $ 8.02 /tonne processed  
Total By-Product Cash Cost  1   $ 499 /ounce Au  
All-in Sustaining Cost   $ 555 /ounce Au  
Production Data        
LOM     6.6 years  
Total Tonnes to Crusher     42,477,000 tonnes  
Grade gold (Avg.)     0.71 g/t  
Grade silver (Avg.)     13.56 g/t  
Contained gold oz     966,000 ounces  
Contained silver oz     18,517,000 ounces  
Mine Throughput per day     18,000 tonnes/day  
Mine Throughput per year     6,570,000 tonnes/year  
Metallurgical Recovery Gold (Overall)     67 %
Metallurgical Recovery Silver (Overall)     15 %
Average Annual Gold Production     97,472 ounces  
Average Annual Silver Production     415,981 ounces  
Total Gold Produced     642,382 ounces  
Total Silver Produced     2,741,485 ounces  
LOM Strip Ratio     0.58:1  

 

 

 

1 Includes royalties payable

 

Page 31

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The PEA set out above is based upon a preliminary economic assessment, which is preliminary in nature and includes the use of Inferred Mineral Resources, which are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves and there is no certainty that preliminary economic assessment results will be realized. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

 

Interpretation, Conclusions and Recommendations of the Amended Camino Rojo Report

 

The Amended Camino Rojo Report states that the work which has been completed to date has demonstrated that Camino Rojo is potentially a technically and economically viable project and justifies additional work, including a pre-feasibility or feasibility study.

 

The Camino Rojo Project has been designed as an open-pit mine with heap leach for recovery of gold and silver from oxide and transition material with a LOM production of 42.5 million tonnes with an average grade of 0.71 g/t gold and 13.6 g/t silver. This amounts to 966,000 contained ounces of gold and 18.5 million contained ounces of silver. The mine life is about 6.6 years and the LOM strip ratio is 0.58 to 1.

 

Metallurgical test work on the material to date shows acceptable recoveries for gold and silver with low to moderate reagent consumptions. Cement agglomeration does not appear to be required. Leachable material will be crushed to P80 38 mm, stockpiled, reclaimed and conveyor stacked onto the heap leach pad at an average rate of 18,000 tonnes per day. Stacked material will be leached using low grade sodium cyanide solution and the resulting pregnant leach solution will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe plant for the recovery of gold and silver by zinc cementation.

 

Key opportunities for the Camino Rojo Project include:

 

· Based on test work to date, metal recoveries are relatively insensitive to crush size and the same results may be achievable at coarser material sizes, which would result in lower capital and operating costs.

 

· If an agreement can be achieved with the owner of the adjoining claim, there would be an increase in the amount of material that could potentially be mined and processed with the same general mine and process plan as the Amended Camino Rojo Report is based upon. This would be positive for the project economics.

 

Risks for the Camino Rojo Project, other than those already discussed in this AIF, include:

 

· Camino Rojo considers contract mining as part of the base case study. There is a risk that the selected mining contractor may require financial assistance from the owner, either in terms of cash, or loan guarantees, to procure some equipment, which may increase capital costs.

 

· Metallurgical results for the Camino Rojo Project are based on information and data that have been extrapolated from results from historical test work and are speculative due to lack of direct confirmatory test work. There is a risk that the results may be overstated.

 

· Carbonaceous material with preg-robbing characteristics has been identified, which may reduce overall heap performance and metal recovery if processed.

 

· Additional studies on the proposed power line to site, including approval from the Mexican federal electricity commission, is required to confirm the proposed power line is feasible. Based on the results of these studies, an alternative power supply method may be required which may increase project costs.

 

Based on the results of the Amended Camino Rojo Report, KCA and IMC have recommended the following additional work:

 

· The Camino Rojo Project should proceed to the prefeasibility or feasibility study level;

 

· Additional studies and cost estimates for delivery of line power to the project site should be completed;

 

Page 32

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

· Confirmatory metallurgical test work should be completed on representative samples for each mineral type, specifically column leach tests on coarse crushed material; and

 

· Perform geotechnical and hydrogeological studies at the proposed heap, pit, and processing areas.

 

The Amended Camino Rojo Report recommendations include the following additional work for mining and resource development to advance the Camino Rojo Project to the prefeasibility level:

 

· a limited infill drilling program to potentially convert the inferred mineral resource in the pit to indicated or measured mineral resource;

 

· update the resource block model;

 

· update the mine plan and the mine capital and operating costs

 

· an additional 5,000 metres of drilling to further evaluate the known sulphide resource with the goal of defining mineralization that may be economically processed through a mill and flotation plant; and

 

· in addition to continuing the exploration work already underway, a 7,500 metre drill program to test satellite targets to the Camino Rojo deposit with the goal of discovering one or more mineralized zones which may be of economic interest.

 

The total estimated cost to complete the work recommended in the Amended Camino Rojo Report is US$7.5 million.

 

Outlook/Future Plans

 

With the PEA of an open pit mine and heap leach extraction facility based on oxide and transitional material now complete, the Company has commenced a feasibility study on the project. Completion of this work is anticipated in mid-2019. A 14-hole diamond drill program to acquire material for additional column-leach metallurgical testing at KCA in Reno Nevada was completed. Seven metallurgical composites were made from this material; 3 of Kp, and one each of Ki, Transition_Hi Transition_Lo and Transition_sx. For each of the composites except the Transition_sx, three column tests were run at -12.5, -50 and -150mm size fractions, for a total of 18 new column tests. The Transition_sx was only tested with one column at -50mm to see if it should continue to be considered as waste. Preliminary and some final results have been returned. Once all results are finalized, the new column recovery information will be used to help determine the feasibility study recovery estimates.

 

Three holes were drilled to provide information for a pit slope stability analysis. A series of test pits and shallow drill holes were completed under the proposed heap leach pad and waste rock facilities as part of geotechnical evaluations. No significant negative issues were detected. To date, 14 RC holes have been drilled searching for ground water sources. A well has recently been established by one of these holes that intersected abundant water approximately 5 km north of the proposed development. Pump testing of this well is currently in progress.

 

Exploration work to evaluate previously identified targets and develop new targets for gold and silver mineralization on our 205,936 ha land position started in early 2018. As mineralization previously discovered on the property demonstrates, shallow cover can mask extensive near-surface mineralization. We completed a 100 line-km Induced Polarization (“IP”) survey with 400 metre spaced lines in the spring of 2018 over the known deposit, areas of potential development, and an adjoining area to the west. Results showed a low but distinctive chargeability anomaly at depth in the area of the current deposit. A similar anomaly at depth to the west of the resource will be tested by drilling in 2019.

 

A new IP survey to the southeast of the resource and proposed development area was started in January 2019. This 120 line-km survey is testing the projection of the San Tiburcio fault, a structure considered important to the emplacement of the known mineralization. Surveying is mostly complete, and modelling of the results will occur in late March and April.

 

Page 33

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Environmental baseline and assessment activities for permitting were initiated in 2018 and are planned to be completed in mid 2019. Permit applications will then be submitted. A Community and Social Responsibility (CSR) program was started in November of 2017 and activities are ongoing.

 

The Company expects to complete the feasibility analysis during the first half of 2019. Contingent upon positive feasibility results, commencement of construction is expected to follow the receipt of necessary permits and first gold would be expected during the first half of 2021.

 

THE CERRO QUEMA PROJECT

 

The following disclosure relating to the Cerro Quema Project has been derived, in part, from the independent technical report for the Cerro Quema Project titled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”) prepared by Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA. The Cerro Quema Report is available for review under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

Project Description, Location and Access

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in the Los Santos Province of south-western Panama. The Cerro Quema Project is located approximately 45 km south-southwest of the city of Chitré which 255 km by road from Panama City on the Panamanian Highway 150 km by air southwest of Panama City. The Project is located at Latitude 7° 33’ 14” N by Longitude 80° 32’ 56” W and at UTM coordinates 17N 549772 mE, 834994 mN (NAD83).

 

The Cerro Quema Project is accessible by road. Container loads of equipment and supplies can be shipped from the Panama Canal to the site by road. Oversized truckloads may require bypass arrangements around bridges and power lines. Chitré is the nearest town with regular air service. A helipad is available at the Project’s camp for emergency services.

 

The Cerro Quema Project comprises three contracts between the Republic of Panama and MCQ that grant exclusive rights for mineral extraction of class IV metallic minerals (silver and gold) over 14,893 ha dated between February 26, 1997 and March 3, 1997. The original term of the contracts was 20 years. The contracts can be extended for a first ten-year extension and then two additional extensions of five years each. The Government of Panama retains a 4% net smelter royalty.

 

The concession contracts held by Pershimco through its ownership of MCQ include the following provisions:

 

· the state reserves the right to explore and extract under the granted area, by itself or by concessions to third parties, other natural resources including different minerals to those granted under the contract;

 

· a land tax and royalty against production must be paid to the government as per Article 211 of the Mining Resources Code;

 

· the concession holder must submit to the government a detailed work plan each year including approximate cost;

 

· the concession holder has the right to import equipment, parts, and supplies to be used in any mining operation free of importation taxes and custom fees, except for fuel and vehicles that are not used in the mining operation;

 

· a warranty fund in the amount of 100,000 Panamanian balboas (“PAB”) (equivalent to US$100,000) in the form of an insurance company deposit must be put in place to guarantee the payment of repairs for damage caused by dangerous acts or restoration due to abandonment for each concession. The fund must stay in place for two years after the expiration of the contract to ensure compliance; and

 

Page 34

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

· a warranty fund in the amount of 15,000 PAB must be put in place to guarantee compliance with the obligations of each contract.

 

The original 20-year term for the concessions expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). Subsequent to the date of the Cerro Quema Report, the Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. The Company believes it has complied with all legal requirements in relation to the concessions. On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications were received, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal of the concessions. The Company has also received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. A permit was received on May 8, 2018 to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018 two permits to use water for drilling were received. An existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current resources was extended for two years in May 2018. On February 11, 2019 a new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions was received. Furthermore, the Panamanian Ministry of Commerce and Industry accepted the most recent annual report for the concessions which includes a work plan for 2019. The 2019 concessions tax payment was accepted in February 2019.

 

As of the date of this AIF, final concession renewals have not been received.

 

The Company owns the surface rights for land required to mine the Cerro Quema Mineral Reserves and to construct and operate a heap leach facility and part of the land required for proposed upgrades to the project access road.

 

Panama is a constitutional democracy and faces no current threats of hostility either domestically or externally.

 

History

 

Between 1990 and 1994, previous owners completed 4,622.5 metres of core drilling and 17,578.8 metres of RC drilling on the Cerro Quema Project as well as geological mapping and various geochemical surveys. In 1996, a further 1,749.6 metres of core drilling was performed on the La Pava deposit.

 

Resource estimates were completed in 1996 and 2002, and 2011, but such estimates were not prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 and are no longer considered applicable due to subsequent drilling and the current Mineral Resource estimations described below. There has been no production from the Cerro Quema Project.

 

Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit Types

 

Regional Geology

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula, Panama. The Azuero Peninsula is a major topographic feature on the southwest (Pacific) coastline of Panama. The basement rocks of the Peninsula consist of massive and pillowed tholeiitic basalts that are currently interpreted to represent uplifted rocks from the western margin of the Caribbean plate. Following the onset of subduction at about 70 Ma, an arc magmatic sequence developed on the Azuero basement. The rocks of the Azuero Arc Group consist of volcanic rocks including associated tuffs and volcanoclastic rocks ranging in age from approximately 71 Ma to 40 Ma Late Cretaceous to Mid-Paleogene.

 

Local Geology

 

The Cerro Quema district is located within the Los Santos peninsula region in the central part of the Azuero Peninsula. Volcanic rocks in this part of the Azuero Peninsula consist of andesite, dacite, and basalt. Within and beneath the volcanic sequence are marine volcanoclastic sediments (conglomerate, sandstone, and mudstone), limestone and turbidites.

 

Page 35

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The lower unit of the Rio Quema Formation consists of andesitic lava flow rocks, crystal rich sandstone, and turbidites interbedded with hemipelagic limestone. The upper unit contains rocks erupted from submarine dacite lava domes that are inferred to have created a barrier within the fore-arc basin and restricted the marine and volcanoclastic sedimentation patterns. North of the dacite domes, the units comprise massive volcanic rocks, many dikes, and only minor volcanoclastic and limestone units. The upper unit of the Rio Quema formation is intruded by arc-related quartz diorite and granodiorite dike intrusions. The major geological structure on the Azuero Peninsula is the northwest-southeast striking Azuero-Sona fault. This fault separates two different basement terranes. Rocks on the southwest side of the fault are massive basalt flows and pillow lavas with interbedded volcanoclastic sediments. Basement rocks to the northeast of the fault are island-arc volcanics with basalt, andesite and dacite with interbedded sediments. Flat-lying sediments of the Tonasi Formation in places overly the basement rocks, particularly northeast of the Azuero-Sona fault on the southeast coast of the Azuero Peninsula. The Azuero-Sona fault has a very clear trace within the topography of southwest Azuero Peninsula. The fault has probably been seismically active within the Holocene Epoch as indicated by left-laterally offset streams. The slip rate and seismic potential of this major fault, however, is unknown.

 

Property Geology

 

At Cerro Quema, the silica-pyrite alteration is characterized by a highly fractured, vuggy, locally brecciated rock composed of silica and iron-oxides at the surface. The oxidized rock extends from surface to a depth of up to 150 metres. Beneath the oxidation boundary, pyrite is abundant. With few exceptions, gold mineralization above the cut-off grade is restricted to the silica-rich alteration type within the oxidized and leached cap. On the south side of the La Pava deposit, steeply-dipping chalcopyrite veins appear to be associated with late stage fracturing. In this area, a zone of high grade supergene mineralization (0.5 to 5.0% copper) is present beneath the oxidation surface.

 

Pershimco defined three alteration zones related to the Cerro Quema Project deposits: (i) a silica alteration zone, occurring in the core of the deposit, that contains quartz with very minor alumino-silicate clay minerals; (ii) a silica-clay alteration zone that surrounds the silicic core and is composed of silica with up to 30% fine grained alumino-silicate clay minerals (kaolinite, dickite, pyrophillite). This zone may contain medium to low grade mineralization; (iii) and a clay alteration zone that occurs as a transition between the silica-clay alteration and fresh rock. The clay alteration may contain up to 30% illite/smectite clays that replace original feldspar. This zone is unmineralized.

 

Mineralization

 

In the Cerro Quema Project area, several gold mineralized zones are located along a 15 km long, east-west trend. These zones include the La Pava, Quemita-Quema and La Mesita deposits. The mineralized zones are reported as being hosted in a belt of hornblende-pyrite pyroclastic flows and lavas of dacitic and andesitic composition. The volcanic belt is up to 1.5 km wide and conformably bounded to the north and south by epiclastic submarine sediments. The sequence dips south at 45° to 60° north. The main rock types within the mineralized zones are saprolitic dacitic clay, silicious dacite with various degrees of acid leaching and iron-oxide cemented breccia.

 

The gold and copper mineralization are associated with disseminated pyrite, chalcopyrite, enargite and a stockwork of quartz, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and barite with traces of galena and sphalerite. The presence of vuggy silica, alunite, natro-alunite, and enargite in addition to the hydrothermal alteration pattern is compatible with a high-sulfidation epithermal system.

 

Gold occurs as disseminated submicroscopic grains and as invisible gold within the crystalline structure of pyrite, especially in the advanced silica alteration zone. Strong supergene alteration results in the formation of an oxidation cap or gossan and released the gold contained in the pyrite. The highest grades of gold mineralization are near the surface and decrease toward the lower limit of oxidation.

 

The Cerro Quema deposits are characterized by the presence of widespread hydrothermal alteration that forms concentric halos around mineralization. The presence of vuggy silica, alunite, natro-alunite, and enargite in addition to the hydrothermal alteration pattern are compatible with a high sulphidation epithermal system. The alteration pattern is fault controlled, following E-W trending regional faults.

 

Page 36

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Exploration

 

In 2010 and 2011, Pershimco’s exploration efforts focused on drilling. Lithological and structural mapping, channel sampling and geochemical sampling were also conducted in 2011. In 2012, Geotech Ltd. completed airborne geophysics including radiometric, magnetic and VTEM surveys over the entire property. These surveys identified the mineralized trend and highlighted areas of coincident low magnetic susceptibility with low potassium and low Th/K ratios associated with the La Pava and Quema/Quemita deposits. Additionally, the survey identified two previously unknown corridors to the north of the main trend which highlighted areas of coincident low magnetic susceptibility with low potassium and low Th/K ratios similar to those associated with the La Pava and Quema/Quemita mineralized trend. Following the completion of airborne geophysical studies in early 2012, Pershimco conducted ground IP surveys on various geophysical targets. The first surveys done were over the Quema-Quemita target in late 2012. Surveys were completed over La Pava and a new exploration target, Idaida in 2013. Each survey revealed the presence of large chargeable bodies at depth and show a generally inversed cone geometry. These large chargeable bodies are located over more than 11 km along the Cerro Quema Mineralized Corridor, which has been identified to extend for approximately 15 km within the concessions. A total of 144.6 line km of IP survey work was completed, 66.9 km at Quema/Quemita and Idaida, 57.1 km at La Pelona and 20.6 km at La Pava. The IP geophysics program identified resistivity and chargeability anomalies on all four target areas.

 

In 2014, a regional mapping and surface rock chip sampling program focused on a first-pass reconnaissance investigation over the priority targets identified by the airborne geophysical survey. A total of 12,307 line metres were mapped and a total of 1,204 surface rock chip samples were collected.

 

Pershimco contracted an independent petrology consultant in Australia to conduct petrographic analysis on 70 samples. Samples were selected from various drill holes at La Pava, Quema, Quemita, Idaida and Pelona areas. Samples were selected from the deeper feeder structures at La Pava, the oxide gold zone at La Pava, the supergene enriched copper-gold zones at La Pava, both the oxide and sulphide zones at the Pelona and Idaida projects, as well as the oxide and supergene zones at Quema-Quemita. The aim of the petrographic studies was to gather further information about alteration phases, mineralogy, and mineralization sequence within the various deposits in the concession area. X- ray Diffraction work was conducted was conducted to ascertain clay minerals as well as the composition of ‘sericite’-like white mica and the various sulphates.

 

Drilling

 

Between 1990 and 1994, Cyprus Minerals Company and successor companies completed 4,921.3 metres of core drilling and 9,639 metres of RC drilling on the Cerro Quema Project area. Subsequently, Campbell Resources Inc. drilled a further 1,749.6 metres of core drilling on the La Pava deposit in 1996. Since acquiring the Cerro Quema Project in 2010, to the date of the Cerro Quema Report, Pershimco drilled 16,939 metres of core drilling over 79 holes and 32,728 metres of RC drilling over 330 holes. Drilling extended a mineralized structure along the northern flank of the Quema/Quemita deposit to 750 metres. This structure trends SW-NE and is located 100-200 metres north-northeast of the Quema/Quemita open pit perimeter and southeast of the La Mesita deposit and the El Domo zone. Drilling conducted close to the perimeter of the southwestern and central north sections of the open pit design have intercepted new gold oxide and/or supergene copper mineralization. Supergene copper mineralization was encountered in the western area of the open pit design.

 

Drilling in 2013 focused on Mineral Resource definition at the La Pava and Quema/Quemita deposits as well as investigating geophysical anomalies at new exploration targets Idaida and Pelona. Exploration drilling on the Idaida target has revealed both near surface and deeper mineralized feeder structures analogous to the La Pava and Quema/Quemita deposits.

 

Page 37

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Ten holes drilled on La Pava, located outside or within 10 to 15 metres of the southern and northwestern sides of the open pit design have intercepted significant new gold and copper mineralization.

 

Similar to the drilling at the La Pava deposit, the drilling at the Quema-Quemita deposit increased the overall Mineral Resource as well as identified mineralization outside of the current open pit design. Four drill holes located near the perimeter on the south-western and central north sections of the open pit design have intercepted gold oxide and/or supergene copper mineralization, providing new targets for future resource definition and upgrade drilling.

 

RC drilling was initiated to investigate geophysical anomalies in the new exploration target at Cerro Idaida. Upon completion of the RC drill holes, a diamond drill hole “tail” program was initiated to test for additional copper-gold mineralization within the high sulfidation system at depth. The diamond drill hole ‘tails’ encountered additional high- grade copper (enargite-covellite) mineralization as veinlets, disseminations and breccia matrix fill below the final depth of the RC holes and intercepted a deeper, higher temperature (pyrophyllite-rich) feeder zone containing copper and gold mineralization.

 

Drilling also included: two holes located on the north flank of Cerro Quema, collared to intercept a strong (+40 mV/V) IP chargeability anomaly trending north-northwest; two angle (-80) south directed holes located down slope on the north flank of La Pava about 400 metres north of the summit ridge; and two vertical holes each located to test a strong dual apex high within a large IP chargeability anomaly trending southwest to northeast.

 

Including drilling completed subsequent to the date of the Cerro Quema Report, a total of 98,883 metres have been drilled on the Cerro Quema Project since the first drill hole by Cyprus Minerals in 1990. The majority of the drilling has been focused on the main Mineral Resource areas of La Pava and Quema-Quemita.

 

      RC Drilling     Core Drilling  
Year     Number     Length (metres)     Number     Length (metres)  
Pre-2017       577       50,571       154       31,432  
2017       0       0       91       11,880  
2018       0       0       19       5,000  
Total       577       50,571       264       48,312  

 

In 2017, Orla drilled 91 diamond holes for a total of 11,880 metres. Drilling was mainly focused on the Quemita and Cabalito areas with a small number of holes drilled at Chontal and Idaida. To date in 2018, Orla has drilled approximately 5,000 metres in 19 holes in the Caballito and Sombrero areas targeting copper-gold sulphide mineralization.

 

Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification

 

The following outlines the core sampling procedures used by Orla subsequent to the acquisition of the Cerro Quema Project:

 

· Core is delivered from the drill rig to the secure logging area in camp by Orla staff.

 

· After Geotech, logging the core is photographed and logged by geologists.

 

· Samples are cut where possible at 1.5 metre intervals. In the event there is a loss of core, a change in lithological contact, mineralization or alteration contact, or a change in matrix from oxide to sulphide, the minimum sample size allowed is 0.5 metres and the maximum sample size allowed is 2.0 metres.

 

Page 38

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

A rigorous QA/QC program was implemented by Orla. Two QA/QC schedules are used by Orla, for resource definition drilling QA/QC standards and blanks are placed at 1:20 interval, for exploration drilling a 1:40 interval is used. An outline of the QA/QC samples are as follows:

 

· 2% of samples are field duplicates consisting of ¼ core.

 

· 1% of samples are preparation duplicates consisting of a second pulp created from the same coarsely crushed sample.

 

· 1% of samples are assay duplicates, consisting of an analysis of a second split of the same pulp.

 

· 2% of samples are blanks, inserted into the sample stream at the discretion of project geologists, such that they are analyzed sequentially with mineralized material

 

· 2% of the samples are reference standards, 3 different standards ranging from 0.2 to 1.8 g/t Au are currently being used.

 

Samples are prepared in an on-site facility run independently by ALS Minerals. Sample pulps are sent to the ALS Minerals facility in Lima, Peru. All gold results are analysed by ALS Minerals (Au-AA23) using fire assay fusion and an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish. All samples are also analyzed for multi-elements, including silver and copper, using an Aqua Regia (ME-ICP41) method at ALS Laboratories in Peru. Samples with copper values in excess of 1% by ICP analysis are re-run with Cu AA46 aqua regia and atomic absorption analysis.

 

Hole collars are surveyed, and down-hole surveys are taken every hole.

 

Prior to Orla’s acquisition of the Cerro Quema Project, practices with regards to the collection of samples by Pershimco included:

 

(i) Diamond drill core and RC cuttings samples were collected, each approximately one metre. In the event there was a loss of core or cuttings, a change in lithological contact, vein contact or a change in matrix from oxide to sulphide, the minimum sample size allowed was 0.5 metres and the maximum sample size allowed was 1.5 metres.

 

(ii) Lithological contacts, vein contacts and sulphide content were respected with an appropriate sample interval where possible.

 

(iii) A thorough QA/QC program was implemented, which included one field blank and at least one certified reference material, (also referred to as a standard), for every batch of 20 samples sent to the laboratory.

 

The principal lab used was Activation Laboratories (“Actlabs”). Samples were sent to Actlab’s Panama lab for preparation and the resulting pulps were sent to Actlabs in Ancaster, ON, Canada for analysis. Individual samples were entered into the Laboratory Information Management System by Actlabs personnel, dried, and finely crushed. The samples are then returned for a second time to the dryer, and immediately upon their removal from the dryer, were pulverized and riffle-split. Prepared samples were then placed into air-deprived zip lock bags and then into 5-gallon plastic containers, which were sealed and shipped by courier services to Actlabs in Ancaster, Ontario, Canada for assaying. Silver and copper sample tenors were determined using a multi-element ICP method, and gold was determined using fire assay method with atomic absorption finish. Gold values exceeding the 2.5 g/t Au were rerun using fire assay with a gravimetric finish.

 

The Actlabs’ Quality System is accredited to international quality standards through the International Organization for Standardization /International Electrotechnical Commission (“ISO/IEC”) 17025 (ISO/IEC 17025 includes ISO 9001 and ISO 9002 specifications) with CAN-P-1758 (Forensics), CAN-P-1579 (Mineral Analysis) and CAN-P-1585 (Environmental) for specific registered tests by the SCC. The accreditation program includes ongoing audits, which verify the QA system and all applicable registered test methods. Actlabs is also accredited by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference program and Health Canada.

 

Page 39

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

A robust QA/QC program was implemented in 2010, and this program has been maintained throughout the 2011, 2012 and 2013 drill programs since that time. The QA/QC program included the insertion of certified reference materials, field blanks and the preparation of pulp duplicate samples. The results of the 2010-2011 drill programs were previously verified by P&E Mining Consultants Inc. and were found to have passed the strict QA/QC procedures. For the 2012 and 2013 drill programs, a total of six certified reference materials, (also referred to as standards) were used to monitor lab accuracy. Two of the standards were certified for copper-only, and four of them were certified for gold-only. There were 1,725 standards analyzed for gold and 1,155 standards analyzed for copper.

 

Data Verification

 

According to the Cerro Quema Report, Mr. Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., a qualified person, visited the Cerro Quema Project most recently on October 2, 2013, (and previously on January 17 and 18, 2012). During the October site visit, Mr. Yassa collected 12 samples from four holes. Samples were collected from taking either a ¼ split of the half core remaining in the core box or taking a split from the RC cuttings. Samples were placed into plastic bags with a unique tag identification and were placed into a larger bag for transport. Mr. Yassa brought the samples to DHL Courier in Chitré, where they were sent to the offices of P&E in Brampton, ON. From there the samples were sent via courier to AGAT Labs in Mississauga, ON for analysis. AGAT has developed and implemented at each of its locations a quality management system designed to ensure the production of consistently reliable data. The system covers all laboratory activities and takes into consideration the requirements of ISO standards. AGAT maintains ISO registrations and accreditations. ISO registration and accreditation provide independent verification that a quality management system is in operation at the location in question. Most AGAT laboratories are registered or are pending registration to ISO 9001:2000.

 

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

 

Metallurgical testing of material from the Cerro Quema deposit was completed by the previous owners and Pershimco. The testing included: (i) bottle roll tests that evaluated amenability of the materials to cyanidation; (ii) column leach tests that evaluated the amenability of the materials to conventional heap leaching; and (iii) vat leach tests which evaluated the amenability of the materials to treatment in flooded tanks.

 

Conclusions from metallurgical testing are:

 

· an estimated field gold recovery of 86% for all La Pava material and the low grade Quema/Quemita. Further, it is recommended to discount Quema/Quemita ore recovery at 3% recovery of gold per 1 g/t head grade;

 

· oxide material from La Pava responds very well to cyanide bottle roll and column leaching yielding high gold extractions and low reagent consumptions;

 

· at lower head grades (about 1 g/t of gold and lower), extractions are approximately the same for either La Pava or Quema/Quemita material;

 

· at higher head grades (above 1 g/t of gold), the extractions for La Pava are greater than for Quema/Quemita; and

 

· the data show no dependence of gold extraction on crush size for the materials and size ranges tested.

 

Mineral Resources

 

For the Cerro Quema Report, Mineral Resource estimation work was carried out by Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., Antoine Yassa P.Geo., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., all independent Qualified Persons in terms of NI 43-101. Mineral Resource modeling and estimation were carried out using the commercially available Gemcom GEMS software program. Open-pit optimization was carried out using the Whittle Four-X Single Element software program. The effective date of the Mineral Resource estimate is June 30, 2014.

 

Page 40

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Cerro Quema Project Mineral Resource are reported inside an optimized pit shell. The results from the optimized pit shell are used solely for the purpose of reporting Mineral Resources that have reasonable prospects for economic extraction, and the optimization is based on the economic parameters including US$1,500 per ounce gold, 86% oxide Au recovery, 90% sulphide Au recovery, US$2.20 per tonne mining costs, US$6.13 per tonne oxide processing cost, US$12.00 tonne sulphide process cost, US$1.00 per tonne G&A. A cutoff of 0.18 g/t Au was used for oxide mineralization and 0.31 g/t Au for sulphide mineralization. The pit shell was optimized based on Au block grades for oxide zones and gold-equivalent (“AuEq”) block grades for sulphide zones. The gold equivalent block grades were calculated using the formula:

 

Equation 1.0-1

 

AuEq = (Au g/t + (Copper% x 1.6)).

 

Page 41

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2019   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Cerro Quema In-Pit Mineral Resources 1, 2,3, 4, 5

 

La Pava                                          
Zone     Category       Cutoff
(gold g/t)
      Tonnes       Gold
(g/t)
      Copper (%)       AuEq
(g/t)
      Gold (ounces)  
Oxides     Measured       0.18       7,052,600       0.82       0.04       NA       184,900  
Indicated             0.18       10,896,100       0.57       0.04       NA       201,100  
Measured + Indicated             0.18       17,948,700       0.67       0.04       NA       386,000  
Inferred             0.18       331,700       0.36       0.03       NA       3,800  
                                                      AuEq (ounces)  
Sulphides     Measured       0.31       802,000       0.44       0.22       0.80       20,600  
Indicated             0.31       7,664,900       0.39       0.38       1.00       246,100  
Measured + Indicated             0.31       8,466,900       0.39       0.36       0.98       266,700  
Inferred             0.31       75,000       0.28       0.2       0.61       1,500  
Total                                                     Au and AuEq (oz)  
Measured                     7,854,600       0.78       0.06       0.81       205,500  
Indicated                     18,561,000       0.50       0.18       0.75       447,200  
Measured + Indicated                     26,415,600       0.58       0.14       0.77       652,700  
Inferred             ----       406,700       0.35       0.06       0.41       5,300  
Quema + Quemita + Mesita                                                        
Zone     Category       Cutoff
(gold g/t)
      Tonnes       Gold
(g/t)
      Copper (%)       AuEq
(g/t)
      Gold (ounces)  
Oxides     Measured       0.18       0       0       0       NA       0  
Indicated             0.18       5,983,700       0.86       0.03       NA       166,400  
Measured + Indicated             0.18       5,983,700       0.86       0.03       NA       166,400  
Inferred             0.18       335,300       0.38       0.03       NA       4,100  
Sulphides                                                     AuEq (ounces)  
Measured             0.31       0       0       0       0       0  
Indicated             0.31       2,539,000       0.49       0.15       0.73       59,600  
Measured + Indicated             0.31       2,539,000       0.49       0.15       0.73       59,600  
Inferred             0.31       298,100       0.30       0.17       0.57       5,500  
Total                                                     Au and AuEq (oz)  
Measured                     0       0       0       0.00       0  
Indicated                     8,522,700       0.75       0.07       0.82       226,000  
Measured + Indicated                     8,522,700       0.75       0.07       0.82       226,000  
Inferred                     633,400       0.34       0.10       0.47       9,600  

 

 

Notes:

 

(1) Mineral Resources are reported inside an optimized pit shell. AuEq was calculated using Au + 1.6*copper.

(2) Numbers may not add up due to rounding.

(3) Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.

(4) The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Mineral Resources as an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category.

(5) The Mineral Resources were estimated using the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council.

 

Page 42

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Mineral Reserves

 

The Mineral Reserve is that portion of the Mineral Resource that has been identified as mineable within a design pit. The Mineral Reserve estimate incorporates ore mining parameters such as mining recovery and waste rock dilution. The Mineral Reserves form the basis for the Pre-Feasibility Study mine production schedule and mine plans.

 

The Cerro Quema Project mining operation will consist of open-pit mining only with no underground mining component planned, hence, all of the Mineral Reserves are deemed to be open pit reserves. No Inferred Mineral Resources are used in the estimation of the Mineral Reserve. Only oxide resources are used in the estimation of the Mineral Reserve. The Mineral Reserves have been developed in a three-step process: (i) select an optimized open-pit shell to be used as the basis for the pit design; (ii) develop an operational pit design that incorporates benches, detailed pit slope criteria, and truck haulage ramps; and (iii) estimate the in-pit tonnage contained within the operational pit that meets or exceeds the cut-off grade criteria and apply the ore mining parameters (i.e. mining losses and dilution) to that tonnage. The final result is the Mineral Reserve.

 

The Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves are summarized in the table below.

 

Cerro Quema Mineral Reserves 1, 2, 3
La Pava
    Tonnes
(millions)
  Gold
(g/t)
    Copper
(%)
    Gold
(ounces)
Proven     6.82       0.80       0.04       176,000
Probable     7.40       0.67       0.04       159,000
Proven + Probable     14.22       0.73       0.04       335,000
Quema
      Tonnes
(millions)
      Gold
(g/t)
      Copper
(%)
      Gold
(ounces)
Proven                      
Probable     5.49       0.86       0.03       153,000
Proven + Probable     5.49       0.86       0.03       153,000
Total
      Tonnes
(millions)
      Gold
(g/t)
      Copper
(%)
      Gold
(ounces)
Proven     6.82       0.80       0.04       176,000
Probable     12.89       0.75       0.03       312,000
Proven + Probable     19.71       0.77       0.04       488,000

 

Notes:

 

(1) Numbers may not add up due to rounding.

(2) A cut-off grade of 0.21 g/t of gold is used for reporting Mineral Reserves.

(3) Mineral Reserves are estimated at a gold price of US$1,300 per ounce

 

Page 43

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Mining Operations

 

The mining method proposed for the Cerro Quema Project will be a conventional open-pit mine. A fleet of hydraulic excavators and trucks consisting of 50 tonne rigid frame trucks and 40 tonne articulated trucks will be used to mine the ore and waste materials. The drilling and blasting of both ore and waste rock will be required although some materials will be free-digging. The ore production rate delivered to the heap leach pad area is approximately 3.6 million tonnes per year of silica and fresh rock type ore. Clay type ore will be stockpiled and processed at the end of the mine life since this ore requires a different crushing method and agglomeration. Overall total annual mining rates will range from a high of 7.1 million tonnes of combined ore and waste to a low of 5.5 million tonnes with an average of about 6.4 million tonnes per year. This results in an average total daily mining rate of 18,000 tpd. The total mine life is 5 years in duration, not including one year of pre-production. Ore and waste from the La Pava pit will be hauled to the crusher and Chontal waste dump. At the Quema pit, a trade-off study recommended the use of a conveyor system to transport both ore and waste down the hillside. Waste would be tripped off the conveyor in the Chontal valley and ore would be sent to the primary crushing area.

 

Processing and Recovery Operations

 

The Cerro Quema Project will be a 10,000 tpd heap leach facility. Processing at Cerro Quema will be by conventional heap leaching of crushed ore stacked on a single use pad. Gold will be leached from the mineralized material with dilute cyanide solution. Gold will be recovered from solution in a carbon adsorption-desorption-recovery plant to produce doré bars. An apron feeder will deliver the run of mine at a rate of 556 dry tonnes per hour to a vibrating grizzly with 130 mm openings. Grizzly oversize will be crushed by a primary jaw crusher. A secondary screen belt feeder will feed primary crushed rock to a secondary screen. The secondary screen will scalp material at 70 mm. Oversize will be crushed in the secondary cone crusher. Cone crusher product and screen undersize will discharge to the crushed ore stockpile stacker which feeds secondary crushed material to the crushed ore stockpile. The stockpile will be constructed over a subterranean tunnel containing two reclaim belt feeders and the Reclaim Tunnel Conveyor.

 

Pebble lime will be added to the reclaim tunnel conveyor at a nominal rate of 1.6 kg/t material. The crushed material and lime will then be conveyed to the heap for stacking. The ore will be leached using a dilute solution of sodium cyanide applied which will percolate through the material, dissolving gold, and drain by gravity to a pond.

 

Pregnant solution will flow by gravity through the set of five carbon adsorption columns, exiting the last adsorption column as barren solution. The adsorption columns will operate in this fashion until the carbon contained in the lead column achieves the desired precious metal loading and then it will be stripped. Stripping of the gold from the loaded carbon will be accomplished by circulating a heated, dilute caustic and cyanide solution upwards through the carbon bed. The heated solution exits the elution vessel as pregnant eluent. The pregnant eluent flows to the recovery circuit where stripped gold is plated from the pregnant eluent onto mild steel wool cathodes. The mild steel wool cathodes will be removed periodically and treated in the retort furnace which removes all of the water and most of the mercury from the cathodes. The retorted cathodes will then be mixed with fluxes, melted, and poured into doré bars. The doré will then be shipped to an offsite refiner for further processing and sale as fine gold.

 

Infrastructure, Permitting and Compliance Activities

 

An existing site access road intersects with Via Tonosi approximately 32 km south of Macaracas. The access road runs north approximately 7 km to the location of the platform constructed between Quema and La Pava by Pershimco. Improvements to the existing road will be required and include widening to approximately 9 metres to allow two over-the-road trucks to pass, re-contouring to eliminate grades in excess of 7%, and grading to a ditch on one side for drainage.

 

Raw water is required for dust control, fire water, and process water make-up. Raw water will be supplied by a well located approximately 1.1 km north, north east of the existing platform at an elevation of 190 metres above sea level. Raw water will be stored in a tank located south-southeast of the existing platform near the access road to La Pava at an elevation of 480 metres above sea level.

 

The majority of the diesel fuel used at Cerro Quema Project will be offloaded and stored in a cylindrical horizontal steel tank located on the western end of the existing platform at 423 metres above sea level. The tank will supply fuel for the mine fleet and light vehicles.

 

Page 44

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

During construction, a temporary first aid clinic will be located on the existing platform. A treatment room will be located on the first floor of the Warehouse and Workshop building located near the ADR and process ponds. An emergency vehicle is already available at the existing base camp to transport injured or sick people to the nearest hospital.

 

Electrical power will be supplied from the grid by Distribuidora Electrica de Metro-Oeste (Edemet) at the Substation in Las Tablas, a community about 31 km southeast of Chitré along the Carretera Nacional. Power will be delivered to site using a 34.5 kV power line constructed from Las Tablas to Cerro Quema Project. The mine truck shop and warehouse will be housed in an 895 square metre single-story steel building constructed near the center of the existing platform area. The laboratory will be a 441 square metre single-story steel building constructed adjacent to the mine warehouse and workshop building near the center of the existing platform area. An explosives magazine will be located approximately 700 metres south of the existing pad along the access road. A 760 square metre, single-story concrete block administration building will be constructed near the southern corner of the event pond at the 220 masl elevation level. The building will provide space for employee lockers, treatment room office space, a meeting room and utilities for site managers and their staff. The Refinery will be a 339 square metre block building, adjacent to the adsorption, desorption, and recovery area, housing the electrowinning and smelting equipment and also including an office that will allow security to monitor the electrowinning and smelting processes.

 

Environmental Permits

 

An ESIA and permits are in place for a previously proposed continuous vat leach operation. However, as the Cerro Quema Project will utilize heap leach processing methods, the Company initiated an update of the ESIA and associated permits based on the new Cerro Quema Project design to meet Panamanian, more specifically the National Authority of the Environment (Autoridad Nacional del Ambiente, known by its acronym ANAM), requirements. Additional studies that were competed to support the ESIA and permits include:

 

· surface water and groundwater flow and quality conditions during dry and wet seasons;

 

· sediment quality samples at selected surface water locations;

 

· aquatic sampling to characterization seasonal and spatial variation; and 

 

· archaeological survey in potentially disturbed areas.

 

To develop a mine at Cerro Quema, a Category 3 ESIA is required from the Ministry of Environment. An application for this permit was submitted in 2016 (subsequent to the date of the Cerro Quema Report). The Ministry has completed the technical evaluation of the ESIA, and the Company believes the Ministry is in the process of preparing the formal resolution to approve it. Timing of approval is presently not known. When drilling commenced in January 2017, it was in an area covered by previously issued permits. Since then, the Ministry of Environment has issued Orla a two year extension to this permit for the purposes of drilling. Additionally, permits to drill have been granted for all new areas applied for. The Company is actively engaged with government officials at various levels in regard to the ESIA and concession renewals.

 

Environmental Mining Factors

 

The acid-base accounting (“ABA”) test results indicate that samples of potential waste rock from the La Pava zone are expected to contain low to very low sulphide by weight percent, however, there is essentially no buffering capacity. The classification of ABA results indicates that most waste rock samples have low potential for acid generation; however, a smaller portion of the waste rock from La Pava is potentially acid generating. The synthetic precipitation leach test results indicate that there is the potential for metal leaching. Geochemical characterization, including kinetic testing, of additional drill core is being completed to confirm the acid generation and metal leaching potential of the waste rock, in particular material associated with the Quemita-Quema ore bodies. The ABA test results suggest that the oxide fraction of the La Pava and Quemita-Quema heap leached ore have some potential for acid generation and all samples of the sulphide fraction of the La Pava heap leached ore are potentially acid generating. Results of the leachate testing indicate that the La Pava leached oxide ore tailings have a low potential for metal leaching. The development of the open pit will be halted within the oxidation zone such that the underling sulphide bearing, and potentially acid generating rock, will not be exposed.

 

Page 45

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Social Impact

 

In 2013, Pershimco completed a study to describe the socio-economic environment of the communities located within a 12.5 km radius of the Cerro Quema Project and the main urban centres, as well as to identify the local perceptions in regard to Panama’s current state of affairs, the environment, the Cerro Quema Project, and the mining industry in general. Data on demographics, housing and utilities, economics, and health and community well-being were obtained through surveys and secondary sources. The scope of the socio-economic study for the Cerro Quema Project area were expanded during completion of the environmental and social impact assessment. The Company has a Community Relations Department and an active social engagement effort.

 

Capital and Operating Costs

 

The required pre-production capital expenditures for the Cerro Quema Project, as summarized below, are considered to have an accuracy of +/-25%. The scope of these costs includes all mining equipment, process facilities, and infrastructure for the Cerro Quema Project. Most costs have been collected in the last quarter of 2013 and the first quarter of 2014 and are considered to be valid for first quarter 2014 US dollars.

 

The planned Cerro Quema Project capital costs are summarized as follows:

 

Mine        
Direct Costs     US$10,926,000  
Other Costs     US$6,240,000  
Total Pre-Production Mine     US$17,166,000  
         
Process        
Direct Costs     US$78,010,000  
Indirect Costs     US$6,608,000  
Initial Fills, EPCM and Owners Costs     US$15,309,0000  
Total Pre-Production Capital Cost     US$99,927,000  
         
Total Cerro Quema     US$117,093,000  

 

The planned Cerro Quema Project sustaining capital and reclamation costs are summarized as follows:

 

Area        
Leach     US$9,906,000  
Mine     US$3,527,000  
Closure     US$10,381,000  
Total     US$23,814,000  

 

Page 46

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The planned Cerro Quema Project average operating costs are summarized as follows:

 

Description        
Mining (owners’ fleet)     US$3.30  
Processing (average)     US$4.40  
G and A     US$0.93  
Total Operating Cost/Tonne Ore     US$8.63  
Cash Operating Cost (per ounce of gold)     US$402  

 

Based on the estimated production parameters, revenue, capital costs, operating costs, taxes and royalties, a cash flow model was prepared by KCA for the economic analysis of the Cerro Quema Project.

 

The period of analysis of 16 years includes two years of pre-production and investment, six years of production, three years for closure and reclamation and five additional years of monitoring. Other assumptions relied upon in the cash flow model include:

 

· gold price of US$1,275 per ounce; processing rate of 10,000 tonnes per day ore; average gold grade of 0.77 g/t; total average opex of US$8.63 per tonne; total preproduction capex of US$117.1 million; net smelter royalties of 4% (Government); Income Tax Rate of 25%; ITBMS tax of 7%; local and land use taxes of approximately US$81,000 per year; gold recoveries of: 86% for all La Pava material above the cut off head grade and the low grade Quema/Quemita

 

For Quema/Quemita, the following formula should be used to estimate gold recovery at varying head grades greater than 1 g/t Au:

 

% Au = (86% - ((g Au/t -1) x 3%))

 

Page 47

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Cerro Quema Project economics, based on these criteria from the cash flow model, are summarized as follows:

 

Life of Mine Summary – Financial Analysis        
         
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax     33.7 %
         
NPV @ 0% (After-Tax)     US$152,415,000  
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax)     US$110,052,200  
NPV @ 10% (After-Tax)     US$77,997,400  
         
Gold Price Assumption (US$/Ounce)     US$1,275  
Pay Back Period (Years based on After-tax)     2.2  
         
Initial Capital Costs        
Pre-Production Initial Capital     US$115,929,368  
Working Capital     US$1,163,664  
Total Initial Capital     US$117,093,032  
         
Future Capital (life of mine)     US$23,480,397  
         
Operating Costs (Average Life of Mine)        
Mining (Contract and Owner)     US$3.30  
Processing     US$4.40  
G&A     US$0.93  
Total Operating Cost/Tonne Ore     US$8.63  
Cash Operating Costs (per ounce of gold)     US$402  
         
Production Data        
Life of Mine     5.3  
Mine Throughput (Ore)     10,000  
Metallurgical Recovery Au (Avg)     85.8 %
Average Annual Gold Production     78,800  
Average LOM Strip Ratio (waste: ore)     0.72  

 

Exploration Update Subsequent to Date of Cerro Quema Report

 

2017 Exploration

 

Exploration at Cerro Quema in 2017 targeted zones of high-sulphidation style alteration that could potentially host additional oxide gold resources. Exploration also tested for sulphide copper-gold mineralization below the level where the rocks are oxidized. There have not been any exploration results subsequent to the Mineral Resource estimate that would materially impact the Mineral Resource estimate used for the pre-feasibility study contained in the Cerro Quema Report.

 

Page 48

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

A total of 72.7 line km of IP-resistivity and 70.3 line km of magnetic survey were completed by SJ Geophysics of Vancouver, Canada in March through June 2017. Geophysics was completed over five separate exploration targets. In addition, two reconnaissance lines were completed in an area with intrusive-hosted mineralization potential. Resistivity anomalies outlined by the survey were interpreted to be due to silica associated with high sulphidation alteration. Anomalies drilled to date have confirmed this interpretation and drilling to test them continues. One of the reconnaissance lines over the area with potential intrusive hosted mineralization had a strong chargeability anomaly indicating the presence of sulphides. Follow-up work on this anomaly is planned.

 

In early 2017, the Company commenced a drill program to test areas on the property that have potential to host additional Mineral Resources. A contract for diamond drilling was awarded to Energold de Panama S.A., who mobilized 3 man-portable rigs to the site. A total of 11,880 metres in 91 holes were completed in 2017. All results have been provided by the Company in press releases between April 27, 2017 and January 8, 2018.

 

Holes were drilled in the general area of the Quemita Zone (one of two zones that contain the 488,000 ounce Cerro Quema oxide gold Mineral Reserve); areas north of the Quemita zone; the area between the two resource areas (Chontal); and the Idaida and Caballito area to the south of Quemita. Drill targets included resistivity anomalies and areas of alteration that may host undiscovered gold mineralization in oxidized material. Along with testing for new discoveries, the drilling tested potential extensions to the resource zones outlined in the Cerro Quema Report, and possible upgrades to the resources within the pre-feasibility study proposed pits.

 

A new zone at Cabalito comprised of low-arsenic copper-gold mineralization and located 2 km south of Quemita was discovered in 2017.

 

Six holes were drilled in 2017 to obtain material for additional metallurgical testing. (3 at Quemita and 3 at La Pava). Material has been sent to KCA in Reno for column tests at a larger particle size than previous tests conducted on material from the property.

 

2018 Exploration

 

Drilling continued at Cerro Quema in 2018 with one rig currently in operation. A total of 7,536 metres were drilled in 2018 in 27 holes.

 

This work focused on the Caballito copper-gold discovery, and the Sombrero zone which is adjacent to the north of Caballito.

 

The Caballito zone is defined by a 650 to 800-metre-long northwest-southeast trending chargeability anomaly outlined by a 2017 IP survey. It is 350 to 400 metres wide. Highest grade mineralization occurs on the southwest side of the zone and is associated with very low resistivity within the overall chargeability due to very high sulphide content. Widths in excess of 100 metres grading better than 1% copper and associated 0.2 to 0.4 grams per tonne gold have been reported.

 

In 2018, the Company re-examined core from sulphide intercepts below the Quemita oxide gold mineral reserve located 1.2 km to the northwest of Caballito and found indications of Caballito style copper-gold mineralization with low arsenic. Therefore, Orla extended the IP grid northward from the area surveyed in 2017 through this area and completed 25 line-km of new surveying in 2018. Results from the new IP indicated areas with potential for similar mineralization as found at Caballito. Six holes drilled north of Caballito in Sombrero intersected variable zones of alteration, but no high-grade mineralization. Further drilling is planned.

 

The Company completed column testing on material at larger sizes than previously tested. Gold recoveries on material crushed to 150 millimetres were 96% for the La Pava deposit, which contains approximately two thirds of the current mineral reserves, and 91% for the Quemita deposit. Operational recovery estimates are typically de-rated from column test data, but these results compare very favorably to an average operational recovery of 86% in the 2014 Pre-Feasibility Study at a crush size of -70 millimetres. Orla will incorporate the results into an updated process plan and operational recovery estimates that will consider one-stage crushing or run of mine instead of the two-stage crushing modelled in the 2014 PFS.

 

Page 49

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Cerro Quema 

2018 Drill Summary 

Dec 31, 2018

 

Hole Area East North Az Dip Depth Intercepts
              From to Width Au g/t Cu %
CQMET-17-154 La Pava 549682 835017 180 -70 147.0 Met Hole (was drilled 40.5 to 147.0 in 2018)
CQDH-18-156 Caballito 554266 834599 90 -60 240.0 46.2 193.8 147.6 0.21 0.33
CQDH-18-157 Caballito 554352 834630 90 -60 247.5 9.0 39.0 30.0 0.73 ox
39.0 52.5 13.5 0.59 sx
75.0 199.5 124.5 0.47 1.54
including 94.5 127.5 33.0 0.49 2.78
CQDH-18-158 Caballito 554157 834600 90 -60 351.0 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-159 Caballito 554320 834475 70 -50 327.0 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-160 Caballito 554472 834626 90 -60 300.0 39.6 125.4 85.8 0.39 1.44
CQDH-18-161 Caballito 554432 834715 90 -60 229.5 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-162 Idaida 554389 834902 90 -60 300.0 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-163 Caballito 554280 834703 90 -60 300.0 4.5 18.0 13.5 0.45 ox
42.5 190.2 147.7 0.28 1.25
including 145.0 187.0 42.0 0.36 3.12
CQDH-18-164 Idaida 554192 834931 90 -60 232.5 0.0 33.0 33.0 0.81 ox
52.5 96.3 43.8 0.36 ox
96.3 122.0 25.7 0.52 1.96
129.5 144.0 14.5 0.35 0.72
CQDH-18-165 Caballito 554642 834604 90 -60 231.0 36.0 45.0 9.0 0.92 0.19
56.7 78.8 22.1 0.27 0.52
CQDH-18-166 Caballito 554650 834850 250 -65 285.0 56.8 71.0 14.2 0.31 0.32
80.8 146.0 65.2 0.30 0.83
including 81.3 93.0 11.7 0.28 2.38
CQDH-18-167 Idaida 554155 835144 90 -50 295.5 134.5 236.2 101.7 0.10 0.27
        including 223.5 234.0 10.5 0.16 0.76
CQDH-18-168 Idaida 554151 835146 225 -50 250.5 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-169 Idaida 554153 835145 60 -50 300.0 128.0 262.0 134.0 0.14 0.62
CQDH-18-170 Idaida 554498 834911 90 -45 232.5 25.5 54.0 28.5 0.30 0.30
CQDH-18-171 Idaida 554498 834911 90 -70 201.0 79.9 84.5 4.6 0.12 0.94
130.5 135.0 4.5 0.13 1.07
CQDH-18-172 Sombrero 553620 835714 90 -65 243.0 No significant intercepts

 

Page 50

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Annual Information Form  
Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Hole Area East North Az Dip Depth Intercepts
              From to Width Au g/t Cu %
CQDH-18-173 Sombrero 554051 835691 325 -60 235.5 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-174 Sombrero 553989 835621 270 -60 120.0 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-175 Sombrero 553940 835494 270 -80 360.0 22.0 35.4 13.4 2.11 0.07
CQDH-18-176 Sombrero 553934 835502 90 -65 177.0 24.0 43.5 19.5 0.59 0.06
CQDH-18-177 Sombrero 554223 834801 90 -60 274.5 0.0 14.6 14.6 0.25  
136.6 196.6 60.0 0.09 0.10
CQDH-18-178 Caballito 554283 834706 270 -75 210.0 67.0 119.5 52.5 0.30 0.84
including 68.0 90.3 22.3 0.34 1.48
CQDH-18-179 Idaida 554140 835047 90 -65 454.5 0.0 6.1 6.1 0.30  
68.7 129.8 61.1 0.55 1.34
including 103.5 128.3 24.8 0.89 2.91
CQDH-18-180 Idaida 554385 834900 270 -55 289.5 No significant intercepts
CQDH-18-181 Idaida 554370 835164 270 -70 414.0 104.1 114.5 10.4 0.13 0.92
140.5 297.0 156.5 0.15 0.69
including 140.5 151.5 11.0 0.23 1.99
including 162.0 207.7 45.7 0.24 1.30
including 245.9 255.3 9.4 0.20 1.13
CQDH-18-182 Idaida 554174 835299 90 -65 328.5 No significant intercepts
Total 2018 drilling (metres)         7,536.0  

 

Notes:

(1) All gold and copper values are uncut except for hole CQDH-18-160 where a 7.0% and a 36.0% assay were cut to 3.4% (third highest assay).

(2) Widths are shown as intercepted widths.

(3) Drill results were reviewed and approved by Hans Smit, P.Geo., Chief Operating Officer at Orla.

(4) Data as of December 31, 2018.

(5) ox = oxide.

 

Outlook/Future Plans

 

The Company has an ongoing environmental management plan that includes installing and maintaining sediment dams, reforestation of previously disturbed areas and active sediment control activities. Baseline surface water quality sampling and groundwater level measurements are also ongoing.

 

The Company has an active community relations program that includes providing hot lunches to 5 to 15-year-old children studying in the 12 schools located within a 15 kilometre radius of the Project. We also provide support for various local amateur sports teams, a youth orchestra, local fairs, and cultural events.

 

There has been no drilling at Cerro Quema in 2019 to date. In January 2019, the total workforce at Cerro Quema was reduced from 77 to 36 employees in an effort to reduce the day-to-day expenditures at the project. Further drill testing for additional Caballito-style copper-gold mineralization is planned for later this year and the Company expects that workforce to increase from current level as a result. Once the Camino Rojo feasibility study is completed, an update to the Cerro Quema pre-feasibility study is planned.

 

Page 51

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

RISK FACTORS

 

In addition to the usual risks associated with an investment in a mineral exploration and development company, the Company believes that, in particular, the risk factors set out below should be considered. It should be noted that this list is not exhaustive and that other risk factors may apply. If any of these risks materialize into actual events or circumstances or other possible additional risks and uncertainties of which the Directors of the Company are currently unaware or which they consider not to be material in relation to the Company’s business, actually occur, the Company’s assets, liabilities, financial condition, results of operations (including future results of operations), business and business prospects could be materially adversely affected. In such circumstances, the price of the Company’s securities could decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment. An investment in the Company may not be suitable for all investors.

 

FINANCING RISKS

 

The Company has limited financial resources, no history of mineral production, operations or source of operating cash flow and continues to experience losses from operations, a trend the Company expects to continue. The exploration and development of the Company’s properties, including continuing exploration, will require additional financing. Historically, the Company has been financed through the issuance of Common Shares and other equity securities. Although Orla has been successful in the past in obtaining financing, the Company has limited financial resources. The Company has no assurance that additional funding will be available to it in the future to fulfill the Company’s existing obligations or further exploration and development and, if obtained, on terms favourable to the Company. The ability of the Company to arrange additional financing in the future will depend, in part, on prevailing capital market conditions as well as the business performance of the Company.

 

The most likely source of future financing presently available to the Company is through the sale of additional Common Shares, which would mean that each existing shareholder would own a smaller percentage of the Common Shares then outstanding. Alternatively, the Company may rely on debt financing and assume debt obligations that require it to make interest and capital payments. Also, the Company may issue or grant warrants or options in the future pursuant to which additional Common Shares may be issued. Exercise of such warrants or options will result in dilution of equity ownership to the Company’s existing shareholders.

 

Failure to obtain required financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of its anticipated activities in the coming years and could cause the Company to forfeit its interests in some or all of the Company’s properties or to reduce or terminate the Company’s operations. Failure to obtain required financing would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

UNCERTAINTY IN THE ESTIMATION OF MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES

 

The figures for Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources contained in this AIF are estimates only and no assurance can be given that the anticipated tonnages and grades will be achieved, that the indicated level of recovery will be realized or that Mineral Reserves or Mineral Resources will be mined or processed profitably. The Company cannot give any assurance that such estimates will be achieved. Failure to achieve such estimates could have an adverse impact on the Company’s future cash flows, profitability, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Until a deposit is actually mined and processed, the quantity of metal and grades must be considered as estimates only. Actual Mineral Reserves or Mineral Resources may not conform to geological, metallurgical, or other expectations, and the volume and grade of ore recovered may differ from estimated levels. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, including many factors beyond the Company’s control. Such estimation is a subjective process, and the accuracy of any Mineral Reserve or Mineral Resource estimate is a function of the quantity and quality of available data and of the assumptions made and judgments used in engineering and geological interpretation. It is inherently impossible to have full knowledge of particular geologic structures, faults, voids, intrusions, natural variations in and within rock types and other occurrences. Failure to identify such occurrences in the Company’s assessment of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Page 52

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Short-term operating factors relating to the Mineral Reserves, such as the need for orderly development of the ore bodies or the processing of new or different ore grades, may cause the mining operation to be unprofitable in any particular accounting period. In addition, there can be no assurance that gold recoveries in small scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in larger scale tests under on-site conditions or during production. Fluctuations in gold and base or other precious metals prices, results of drilling, metallurgical testing and production and the evaluation of studies, reports and plans subsequent to the date of any estimate may result in a revision of estimates from time to time or may render the estimates uneconomic to exploit. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve data is not indicative of future results of operations. Estimated Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves for the Company’s properties are evaluated from time to time and may require adjustments or downward revisions based upon further exploration or development work, geological interpretation, drilling results, metal prices or actual production experience. Any material reductions in estimates could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

The category of Inferred Mineral Resource is often the least reliable Mineral Resource category and is subject to the most variability. Due to the uncertainty which may attach to Inferred Mineral Resources, there is no assurance that Inferred Mineral Resources will be upgraded to Proven Mineral Reserves and Probable Mineral Reserves as a result of continued exploration. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

 

The activities of the Company are subject to environmental regulations promulgated by government agencies from time to time. Environmental legislation generally provides for restrictions and prohibitions on spills, releases or emissions of various substances produced in association with certain mining industry operations, such as seepage from tailings disposal areas, which would result in environmental pollution. A breach of such legislation may result in imposition of fines and penalties. In addition, certain types of operations require the submission and approval of environmental impact assessments. Environmental legislation is evolving to stricter standards, and enforcement, fines and penalties for noncompliance are more stringent. Environmental assessments of proposed projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and directors, officers, and employees. The cost of compliance with changes in governmental regulations has a potential to reduce the profitability of operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties in which the Company holds its interests or on properties that will be acquired which are unknown to the Company at present and which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of those properties.

 

The Company’s current or future activities, including exploration and development activities and operations of the Company require licenses, permits or other approvals from various governmental authorities and activities are and will be governed by laws and regulations governing exploration, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, safety, mine permitting and other matters. Companies engaged in exploration and development activities generally experience increased costs and delays as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits. There can be no assurance that all permits that the Company may require for exploration and development will be obtainable on reasonable terms or on a timely basis, or that such laws and regulations would not have an adverse effect on any project that the Company may undertake. The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with all material laws and regulations that currently apply to its activities and that it does not currently have any material environmental obligations. However, there may be unforeseen environmental liabilities resulting from exploration, development and/or mining activities and these may be costly to remedy.

 

The Company does not maintain insurance against all environmental risks. As a result, any claims against the Company may result in liabilities that could have a significant adverse effect on the operations and financial condition of the Company.

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in exploration and development operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the exploration and development activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations and, in particular, environmental laws.

 

Page 53

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of exploration companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on the Company and cause increases in expenditures and costs or require abandonment or delays in developing new mining properties.

 

The Company cannot give any assurances that breaches of environmental laws (whether inadvertent or not) or environmental pollution will not materially or adversely affect its financial condition. There is no assurance that future changes to environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely affect the Company.

 

FOREIGN COUNTRY AND POLITICAL RISK

 

The Company’s principal mineral properties are located in Mexico and Panama. The Company is subject to certain risks as a result of conducting foreign operations, including, but not limited to: currency fluctuations; possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mineral titles or other mineral rights; opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations; government regulations relating to the mining industry; renegotiation, cancellation or forced modification of existing contracts; expropriation or nationalization of property; changes in laws or policies or increasing legal and regulatory requirements including those relating to taxation, royalties, imports, exports, duties, currency, or other claims by government entities, including retroactive claims and/or changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices; uncertain political and economic environments; war, terrorism, sabotage and civil disturbances; delays in obtaining or the inability to obtain or maintain necessary governmental or similar permits or to operate in accordance with such permits or regulatory requirements; currency fluctuations; import and export regulations, including restrictions on the export of gold or other minerals; limitations on the repatriation of earnings; and increased financing costs. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its business.

 

The introduction of new tax laws, regulations or rules, or changes to, or differing interpretation of, or application of, existing tax laws, regulations, or rules in any of the countries in which the Company currently conducts business or in the future may conduct business, could result in an increase in taxes, or other governmental charges, duties, or impositions. No assurance can be given that new tax laws, rules or regulations will not be enacted or that existing tax laws will not be changed, interpreted, or applied in a manner that could result in the Company being subject to additional taxation or that could otherwise have a material adverse effect on us.

 

One of the Company’s principal mineral properties is located in Panama. Panama remains a developing country. If the economy of Panama fails to continue growth or suffers a recession, it may have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations in that country. The Company does not carry political risk insurance.

 

Although the Company believes that its exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations, new rules and regulations may be enacted, and existing rules and regulations may be applied in a manner that could limit or curtail production or development of the Company’s properties. Amendments to current laws and regulations governing the operations and activities of the Company or more stringent implementation thereof could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

CONCESSIONS RISKS

 

The original 20-year term for the concessions at the Cerro Quema Project expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). The Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. The Company believes it has complied with all legal requirements in relation to the concessions. On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications were received, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal of the concessions. The Company has also received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. A permit was received on May 8, 2018 to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018 two permits to use water for drilling were received. An existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current resources was extended for two years in May 2018. On February 11, 2019 a new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions was received. Furthermore, the Panamanian Ministry of Commerce and Industry accepted the most recent annual report for the concessions which includes a work plan for 2019. The 2019 concessions tax payment was accepted in February 2019. As of the date of this AIF, final concession renewals have not been received. There is no assurance that the Company will receive the extensions or receive them within a reasonable time period. Failure to receive the extensions would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

Page 54

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

ESIA PERMIT

 

To develop a mine at Cerro Quema, a Category 3 ESIA is required from the Ministry of Environment. An application for this permit was submitted in 2016. The Ministry has completed the technical evaluation of the ESIA, and the Company believes the Ministry is in the process of preparing the formal resolution to approve it. Timing of approval is presently not known. The Company is actively engaged with government officials at various levels in regard to the ESIA and concession renewals. It is reviewing all options including ceasing site activities until such time as approval of the renewals and the permits is finalized. There is no assurance that the Company will receive the various approvals, including the modification to the ESIA, or receive them within a reasonable time period. Failure to receive the ESIA would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

PERMITTING RISKS

 

The Company’s operations in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates are subject to receiving and maintaining permits (including environmental permits) from appropriate governmental authorities. Furthermore, prior to any development on any of its properties, the Company must receive permits from appropriate governmental authorities. The Company can provide no assurance that necessary permits will be obtained, that previously issued permits will not be suspended for a variety of reasons, including through government or court action, or that delays will not occur in connection with obtaining all necessary permits, renewals of permits for existing operations, or additional permits for any possible future changes to operations, or additional permits associated with new legislation. The Company can provide no assurance that it will continue to hold or obtain, if required to, all permits necessary to develop or continue operating at any particular site, which would materially adversely affect its operations.

 

EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT RISKS

 

The business of exploring for minerals and mining involves a high degree of risk. The operations of the Company may be disrupted by a variety of risks and hazards normally encountered in the exploration, development and production of precious metals, including, without limitation, unusual and unexpected geologic formations, seismic activity, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to, or destruction of, mines and other producing facilities, personal injury or loss of life and damage to tailings dams, property, and environmental damage, all of which may result in possible legal liability. The occurrence of any of these events could result in a prolonged interruption of the Company’s activities that would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Further, the Company may be subject to liability or sustain losses in relation to certain risks and hazards against which it cannot insure or for which it may elect not to insure. The occurrence of operational risks and/or a shortfall or lack of insurance coverage could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Even when mineralization is discovered, it may take several years until production is possible, during which time the economic feasibility of production may change. Major expenses may be required to locate and establish Mineral Reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the exploration or development programs planned by Orla will result in a profitable commercial mining operation. Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, some of which are: the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, metal prices that are highly cyclical, and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital. There is no certainty that the expenditures made towards the search and evaluation of mineral deposits will result in discoveries or development of commercial quantities of ore. Development projects have no operating history upon which to base estimates of future capital and operating costs. For development projects, Mineral Resource estimates and estimates of operating costs are, to a large extent, based upon the interpretation of geologic data obtained from drill holes and other sampling techniques, and feasibility studies, which derive estimates of capital and operating costs based upon anticipated tonnage and grades of ore to be mined and processed, ground conditions, the configuration of the ore body, expected recovery rates of minerals from ore, estimated operating costs, and other factors. As a result, actual production, cash operating costs and economic returns could differ significantly from those estimated. It is not unusual for new mining operations to experience problems during the start-up phase, and delays in the commencement of production can often occur.

 

Page 55

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

THE CAMINO ROJO PROJECT MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE ASSUMES THAT THE COMPANY CAN ACCESS MINERAL TITLES AND LANDS THAT ARE NOT CONTROLLED BY THE COMPANY

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s Mineral Resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the Mineral Resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by the Adjacent Owner and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire Mineral Resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the Mineral Resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the Mineral Resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the PEA dated June 19, 2018, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full Mineral Resource. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full Mineral Resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The PEA was based on only a portion of the total Mineral Resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the PEA.

 

MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATIONS FOR THE CAMINO ROJO PROJECT ARE ONLY ESTIMATES AND RELY ON CERTAIN ASSUMPTIONS

 

The estimation of Mineral Resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

Page 56

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

In particular, the estimation of Mineral Resources for the Camino Rojo Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the Mineral Resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached.

 

Although all mineralization included in the Company’s Mineral Resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the Mineral Resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in Mineral Resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

SURFACE RIGHTS

 

There are three ejido communities in the vicinity of the main area of drilling at the Camino Rojo Project and other ejido lands cover most of the rest of the property. The lands that would be required by the Company for a potential open pit mine and heap leach facility are subject to an expropriation agreement between the Company and the San Tiburcio Ejido. For exploration activities, the Company enters into temporary occupation agreements with the ejido communities, which allow the Company to use the surface of the lands for its mining activities for a set period of time. In Mexico, mining rights that are covered under a concession do not include direct ownership or possession rights over the surface, or surface access, and at any particular time the Company may be involved in negotiations with various ejido communities to enter into new temporary occupation agreements or other surface access agreements or amend existing agreements. Failure to reach new agreements or disputes regarding existing agreements may cause, blockades, suspension of operations, delays to projects, and on occasion, may lead to legal disputes. Any such failure to reach new agreements or disputes regarding existing agreements may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

 

PRODUCTION ESTIMATES

 

The Company has Mineral Reserve estimations for its existing Cerro Quema Project and such estimates are based on a pre-feasibility study. The Company cannot give any assurance that such estimates will be achieved. Failure to achieve such estimates could have an adverse impact on the Company’s future cash flows, profitability, results of operations and financial condition. The realization of estimates is dependent on, among other things, the accuracy of Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates, the accuracy of assumptions regarding grades and recovery rates, ground conditions (including hydrology), the physical characteristics of deposits, the presence or absence of particular metallurgical characteristics, and the accuracy of the estimated rates and costs of mining, haulage, and processing. Actual production may vary from estimates for a variety of reasons, including the actual ore mined varying from estimates of grade or tonnage; dilution and metallurgical and other characteristics (whether based on representative samples of ore or not); short-term operating factors such as the need for sequential development of ore bodies; mine failures or slope failures; industrial accidents; natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions, floods, droughts, rock slides and earthquakes; encountering unusual or unexpected geological conditions; changes in power costs and potential power shortages; shortages of principal supplies needed for mining operations, including explosives, fuels, chemical reagents, water, equipment parts and lubricants; plant and equipment failure; the inability to process certain types of ores; labour shortages or strikes; and restrictions or regulations imposed by government agencies or other changes in the regulatory environment. Such occurrences could also result in damage to mineral properties or mines, interruptions in production, injury or death to persons, damage to property of the Company or others, monetary losses, and legal liabilities in addition to adversely affecting mineral production.

 

COST ESTIMATES

 

Capital and operating cost estimates discussed herein may not prove accurate. Capital and operating cost estimates are based on the interpretation of geological data, feasibility studies, anticipated climatic conditions, market conditions for required products and services, and other factors and assumptions regarding foreign exchange currency rates. Any of the following events could affect the ultimate accuracy of such estimate: unanticipated changes in grade and tonnage of ore to be mined and processed; incorrect data on which engineering assumptions are made; delay in construction schedules, unanticipated transportation costs; the accuracy of major equipment and construction cost estimates; labour negotiations; changes in government regulation (including regulations regarding prices, cost of consumables, royalties, duties, taxes, permitting and restrictions on production quotas on exportation of minerals); and title claims. Changes in the Company’s anticipated production costs could have a major impact on any future profitability. Changes in costs of the Company’s anticipated mining and processing operations could occur as a result of unforeseen events, including international and local economic and political events, a change in commodity prices, increased costs (including oil, steel, and diesel) and scarcity of labour, and could result in changes in profitability or Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates. Many of these factors may be beyond the Company’s control. There is no assurance that actual costs will not exceed such estimates. Exceeding cost estimates could have an adverse impact on the Company’s future results of operations or financial condition.

 

Page 57

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

METAL PRICES

 

The Company’s long-term viability depends, in large part, upon the market price of gold. Market price fluctuations of gold could adversely affect the profitability of the Company’s operations and lead to impairments and write downs of mineral properties. Metal prices have fluctuated widely, particularly in recent years. The marketability of metals is also affected by numerous other factors beyond the control of the Company, including government regulations relating to price, royalties, global consumption patterns, supply of, and demand for, metals, speculative activities, allowable production and importing and exporting of minerals, the effect of which cannot accurately be predicted. There can be no assurance that the price of any commodities will be such that any of the properties in which the Company has an interest may be mined at a profit.

 

Declining metal prices can also impact operations by requiring a reassessment of the feasibility of a particular project. Even if a project is ultimately determined to be economically viable, the need to conduct such a reassessment may cause substantial delays and/or may interrupt operations until the reassessment can be completed, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

 

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CONDITIONS

 

Market events and conditions, including the disruptions in the international credit markets and other financial systems, along with political instability and falling currency prices expressed in United States dollars have resulted in commodity prices remaining volatile. These conditions have also caused a loss of confidence in global credit markets, resulting in a climate of greater volatility, tighter regulations, less liquidity, widening credit spreads, less price transparency, increased credit losses and tighter credit conditions. Notwithstanding various actions by governments, concerns about the general condition of the capital markets, financial instruments, banks and investment banks, insurers and other financial institutions have caused the broader credit markets to be volatile and interest rates to remain at historical lows. These events are illustrative of the effect that events beyond the Company’s control may have on commodity prices; demand for metals, including gold and silver; availability of credit; investor confidence; and general financial market liquidity, all of which may adversely affect the Company’s business.

 

These factors may impact the ability of the Company to obtain equity or debt financing in the future and, if obtained, on terms favourable to the Company. Increased levels of volatility and market turmoil can adversely impact the Company’s operations and the value, and the price of the Common Shares could be adversely affected.

 

UNINSURED RISKS

 

Exploration, development, and production operations on mineral properties involve numerous risks, including but not limited to unexpected or unusual geological operating conditions, rock bursts, cave-ins, fires, floods, landslides, earthquakes and other environmental occurrences, risks relating to the storage and shipment of precious metal concentrates or doré bars, and political and social instability. Such occurrences could result in damage to mineral properties, damage to underground development, damage to production facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage to the Company’s properties or the properties of others, delays in the ability to undertake exploration, monetary losses, and possible legal liability. Should such liabilities arise, they could reduce or eliminate future profitability and result in increasing costs and a decline in the value of the securities of the Company.

 

Page 58

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Although the Company maintains insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers reasonable, its insurance policies do not cover all the potential risks associated with a mining company’s operations. The Company may also be unable to maintain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance coverage may not continue to be available or may not be adequate to cover any resulting liability. Moreover, insurance against risks such as environmental pollution or other hazards as a result of exploration and production is not always available to the Company or to other companies in the mining industry on acceptable terms. The Company might also become subject to liability for pollution or other hazards which it may not be insured against or which the Company may elect not to insure against because of premium costs or other reasons. The Company does not currently maintain insurance against political risks, underground development risks, production facilities risks, business interruption or loss of profits, theft of doré bars, the economic value to re-create core samples, environmental risks, and other risks. Furthermore, insurance limits currently in place may not be sufficient to cover losses arising from insured events. Losses from any of the above events may cause the Company to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect upon its financial performance and results of operations.

 

COMPETITION

 

The mineral exploration business is competitive in all of its phases. The Company competes with numerous other companies and individuals, including competitors with greater financial, technical, and other resources than the Company, in the search for and acquisition of exploration and development rights on desirable mineral properties, for capital to finance its activities and in the recruitment and retention of qualified employees. There is no assurance that the Company will continue to be able to compete successfully with its competitors in acquiring exploration and development rights, financing, or recruiting and retaining employees.

 

TITLE MATTERS

 

The acquisition of title to mineral tenures in Mexico and Panama is a detailed and time-consuming process. Although the Company has diligently investigated title to all mineral tenures and, to the best of its knowledge, title to all of its properties is in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to any of the Company’s mineral properties and any of the Company’s properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected encumbrances or defects or governmental actions. Title to the Company’s properties may also be affected by undisclosed and undetected defects.

 

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

 

The Company’s Directors and officers may serve as directors or officers of other companies or have significant shareholdings in other resource companies and, to the extent that such other companies may participate in ventures in which the Company may participate, the Directors of the Company may have a conflict of interest in negotiating and concluding terms respecting the extent of such participation. In the event that such a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the Company’s Directors, a Director who has such a conflict will abstain from voting for or against the approval of such participation or such terms. In accordance with the laws of British Columbia, the Directors of the Company are required to act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Company.

 

COMPLIANCE WITH ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS

 

Orla is subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of the United States of America, and similar laws in any country in which the Company conducts business. In general, these laws prohibit a company and its employees and intermediaries from bribing or making other prohibited payments to foreign officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. In recent years, there has been a general increase in both the frequency of enforcement and the severity of penalties under such laws, resulting in greater scrutiny and punishment to companies convicted of violating anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. Furthermore, a company may be found liable for violations by not only its employees, but also by its contractors and third-party agents.

 

Page 59

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Company’s Camino Rojo Project is located in Mexico and the Cerro Quema Project is located in Panama, both of which countries which are perceived as having fairly high levels of corruption. Orla cannot predict the nature, scope, or effect of future anti-corruption regulatory requirements to which the Company’s operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

 

Failure to comply with the applicable legislation and other similar foreign laws could expose the Company and/or its senior management to civil and/or criminal penalties, other sanctions and remedial measures, legal expenses, and reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the applicable anti-corruption legislation by Canadian or foreign authorities could also have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

As a consequence of these legal and regulatory requirements, the Company has instituted policies with regard to business ethics, which have been designed to ensure that Orla and its employees comply with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that such efforts have been and will be completely effective in ensuring the Company’s compliance, and the compliance of its employees, consultants, contractors, and other agents, with all applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations.

 

SHARE PRICE FLUCTUATIONS

 

The Common Shares are listed and posted for trading on the TSX. An investment in the Company’s securities is highly speculative. In recent years, the securities markets have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market price of securities of many companies, particularly those considered exploration, or development-stage companies such as the Company, have experienced wide fluctuations in price which have not necessarily been related to the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. There can be no assurance that continual fluctuations in price will not occur.

 

TAX MATTERS

 

The Company is subject to income taxes and other taxes in a variety of jurisdictions and the Company’s tax structure is subject to review by both Canadian and foreign taxation authorities. The Company’s taxes are affected by a number of factors, some of which are outside of its control, including the application and interpretation of the relevant tax laws and treaties. If the Company’s filing position were to be challenged for whatever reason, this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS

 

The Company’s operations in Mexico and Panama make it subject to foreign currency fluctuations and such fluctuations may materially affect the Company’s financial position and results. The Company reports its financial results in Canadian dollars with the majority of transactions denominated in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, and Mexican pesos. As the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar and Mexican peso fluctuate against the Canadian dollar, the Company will experience foreign exchange gains or losses. The Company does not use an active hedging strategy to reduce the risk associated with currency fluctuations.

 

LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY

 

The Company has no history of generating operating revenues or profits. The Company expects to continue to incur losses unless and until such time as it develops its properties and commences operations on its properties. The development of the properties will require the commitment of substantial financial resources. The amount and timing of expenditures will depend on a number of factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, including the progress of ongoing exploration, studies and development, the results of consultant analysis and recommendations, the rate at which operating losses are incurred and the execution of any joint venture agreements with strategic parties, if any. There can be no assurance that the Company will generate operating revenues or profits in the future.

 

Page 60

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

NEGATIVE OPERATING CASH FLOW

 

The Company is an exploration stage company and has not generated cash flow from operations. The Company is devoting significant resources to the development of the Camino Rojo Project, the Cerro Quema Project and to actively pursue exploration and development opportunities, however, there can be no assurance that it will generate positive cash flow from operations in the future. The Company expects to continue to incur negative consolidated operating cash flow and losses until such time as it achieves commercial production at a particular project. The Company currently has negative cash flow from operating activities.

 

LITIGATION RISK

 

All industries, including the mining industry, are subject to legal claims, with and without merit. Defence and settlement costs of legal claims can be substantial, even with respect to claims that have no merit. Due to the inherent uncertainty of the litigation and dispute resolution process, the litigation process could take away from management time and efforts and the resolution of any particular legal proceeding to which the Company may become subject could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or the Company’s property development.

 

NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION INTERVENTION

 

The Company’s relationship with the communities in which it operates is critical to ensure the future success of its existing operations and the construction and development of its projects. Non-governmental organizations may create or inflame public unrest and anti-mining sentiment among the inhabitants in areas of mineral development. Such organizations can be involved, with financial assistance from various groups, in mobilizing sufficient local anti-mining sentiment to prevent the issuance of required permits for the development of mineral projects of other companies. While the Company is committed to operating in a socially responsible manner, there is no guarantee that the Company’s efforts in this respect will mitigate this potential risk.

 

OUTSIDE CONTRACTOR RISKS

 

It is common for certain aspects of mining operations, such as drilling, blasting and underground development, to be conducted by outside contractors. As a result, the Company is subject to a number of risks, including: reduced control over the aspects of the tasks that are the responsibility of the contractors; failure of the contractors to perform under their agreements with the Company; inability to replace the contractors if their contracts are terminated; interruption of services in the event that the contractors cease operations due to insolvency or other unforeseen events; failure of the contractors to comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements; and failure of the contractors to properly manage their workforce resulting in labour unrest or other employment issues.

 

UNRELIABLE HISTORICAL DATA

 

The Company has compiled technical data in respect of the Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema projects, some of which was not prepared by the Company. While the data represents a useful resource for the Company, much of it must be verified by the Company before being relied upon in formulating exploration programs.

 

UNKNOWN LIABILITIES IN CONNECTION WITH ACQUISITIONS

 

As part of the Company’s acquisitions, the Company has assumed certain liabilities and risks. While the Company conducted thorough due diligence in connection with such acquisitions, there may be liabilities or risks that the Company failed, or was unable, to discover in the course of performing the due diligence investigations or for which the Company was not indemnified. Any such liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

 

Page 61

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

ACQUISITIONS AND INTEGRATION

 

From time to time, the Company examines opportunities to acquire additional mining assets and businesses. Any acquisition that the Company may choose to complete may be of a significant size, may change the scale of the Company’s business and operations, and may expose the Company to new geographic, political, operating, financial and geological risks. The Company’s success in its acquisition activities depends on its ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates, negotiate acceptable terms for any such acquisition, and integrate the acquired operations successfully with those of the Company. Any acquisitions would be accompanied by risks. For example, there may be a significant change in commodity prices after the Company has committed to complete the transaction and established the purchase price or exchange ratio; a material property may prove to be below expectations; the Company may have difficulty integrating and assimilating the operations and personnel of any acquired companies, realizing anticipated synergies and maximizing the financial and strategic position of the combined enterprise, and maintaining uniform standards, policies and controls across the organization; the integration of the acquired business or assets may disrupt the Company’s ongoing business and its relationships with employees, customers, suppliers and contractors; and the acquired business or assets may have unknown liabilities which may be significant. In the event that the Company chooses to raise debt capital to finance any such acquisition, the Company’s leverage will be increased. If the Company chooses to use equity as consideration for such acquisition, existing shareholders may experience dilution. Alternatively, the Company may choose to finance any such acquisition with its existing resources. There can be no assurance that the Company would be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions.

 

NO DIVIDENDS

 

No dividends on the Common Shares have been paid by the Company to date and the Company may not declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any payments of dividends will be dependent upon the financial requirements of the Company to finance future growth, the financial condition of the Company and other factors which the Company’s Board of Directors may consider appropriate in the circumstances.

 

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES

 

The Company conducts certain of its operations through foreign subsidiaries and some of its assets are held in such entities. Any limitation on the transfer of cash or other assets between the Company and such entities, or among such entities, could restrict the Company’s ability to fund its operations efficiently. Any such limitations, or the perception that such limitations may exist now or in the future, could have an adverse impact on the Company’s valuation and stock price.

 

ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND INTERNAL CONTROLS

 

The Company prepares its financial reports in accordance with IFRS applicable to publicly accountable enterprises. In preparing financial reports, management may need to rely upon assumptions, make estimates or use their best judgment in determining the financial condition of the Company. Significant accounting policies are described in more detail in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements. In order to have a reasonable level of assurance that financial transactions are properly authorized, assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use, and transactions are properly recorded and reported, the Company has implemented and continues to analyze its internal control systems for financial reporting. Although the Company believes its financial reporting and annual consolidated financial statements are prepared with reasonable safeguards to ensure reliability, the Company cannot provide absolute assurance.

 

ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITIES

 

Substantially all of the assets of the Company are located outside of Canada and certain of the Directors and officers of the Company are resident outside of Canada. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible to enforce judgments granted by a court in Canada against the assets of the Company or the Directors and officers of the Company residing outside of Canada.

 

Page 62

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE

COMMON SHARES

 

The authorized share capital of the Company consists of an unlimited number of Common Shares without par value, of which 179,314,615 Common Shares were issued and outstanding as December 31, 2018, and 179,493,510 Common Shares are issued and outstanding as of March 28, 2019.

 

The holders of Common Shares will be entitled to receive notice of and to attend any meeting of the shareholders of Orla and will be entitled to one vote for each Common Share held (except at meetings at which only the holders of another class of shares are entitled to vote). The holders of Common Shares will be entitled to receive dividends, on a pro rata basis, if, as and when declared by the Board of Directors and, subject to the prior satisfaction of all preferential rights, to participate rateably in the net assets of Orla in the event of any dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of Orla, whether voluntary or involuntary, or other distribution of assets of Orla among shareholders for the purposes of winding up its affairs.

 

WARRANTS

 

None of the Company’s outstanding share purchase warrants are listed and posted for trading on the TSX and none of the Company’s outstanding share purchase warrants, except for the 2018 Warrants, are governed by the terms of a warrant indenture.

 

As of December 31, 2018, and as of the date hereof, 6,737,500 Common Shares are issuable on exercise of the 2021 Warrants, 8,790,600 Common Shares are issuable on exercise of the 2018 Warrants, and 3,000,000 Common Shares are issuable on exercise of outstanding finders’ warrants expiring November 7, 2022.

 

The 2018 Warrants are governed by the terms of a warrant indenture (the “Warrant Indenture”) which provides for adjustment in the number of warrant shares issuable upon the exercise of the 2018 Warrants and/or the exercise price per warrant share upon the occurrence of certain events. From time to time, the Company, and the warrant agent under the Warrant Indenture, without the consent of the holders of the 2018 Warrants, may amend or supplement the Warrant Indenture for certain purposes, including curing defects or inconsistencies or making any change that does not adversely affect the rights of any holder of the 2018 Warrants. For further details, please refer to the full text of the Warrant Indenture which is filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

 

STOCK OPTIONS, RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS, DEFERRED SHARE UNITS AND BONUS SHARES

 

As at March 28, 2019:

 

· 9,124,005 Common Shares are issuable on exercise of outstanding stock options (including options formerly exercisable for Pershimco Shares that were exchanged in accordance with the terms of the Arrangement);

 

· 248,000 Common Shares are issuable upon vesting of outstanding Restricted Share Units (or cash may be payable in lieu thereof); and

 

· 180,000 Common Shares are issuable upon vesting of outstanding Deferred Share Units (or cash may be payable in lieu thereof).

 

In addition, the Company has granted an entitlement to its Chairman of the Board to receive a one-time award of 500,000 Common Shares (“Chairman Bonus Shares”) at a deemed price of $1.39 per Chairman Bonus Share in consideration for his acting as Chairman of the Board, which Chairman Bonus Shares have certain vesting restrictions. The Chairman Bonus Shares will only become issuable on the date that Mr. Jeannes ceases to act as a director of the Company following June 18, 2020, unless the Chairman Bonus Shares sooner vest upon a change of control of the Company as defined in the award agreement.

 

Page 63

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Annual Information Form    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Company has also granted an entitlement to its new President and Chief Executive Officer to receive a one-time award of 1,000,000 Common Shares (“CEO Bonus Shares”), which CEO Bonus Shares have staged vesting restrictions based upon the Company’s achievement of certain 30-day volume weighted average trading price levels on the TSX, at which times a specified percentage of the CEO Bonus Shares will become issuable to Mr. Simpson, unless the CEO Bonus Shares sooner vest upon a change of control as defined in the award agreement.

 

DIVIDENDS

 

The Company has no present intention of paying dividends on its Common Shares, as it anticipates that all available funds will be invested to finance the growth of its business. The payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be reviewed periodically by the Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, conditions then existing including earnings, financial condition and capital requirements, restrictions in financing agreements, business opportunities and conditions and other factors. There are no restrictions that could prevent the Company from paying dividends. The Company has not paid any dividends on its Common Shares since its incorporation.

 

MARKET FOR SECURITIES

 

The Common Shares are currently listed and posted for trading on the TSX under the symbol “OLA”. The following table sets forth information relating to the trading of the Common Shares on the TSXV for the period January 1, 2018 to and including October 31, 2018 and then on the TSX for the balance of the most recently completed financial year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Month   High
(C$)
    Low
($)
    Volume  
January 2018     1.85       1.56       2,297,800  
February 2018     1.62       1.35       1,364,100  
March 2018     1.44       1.26       1,027,300  
April 2018     1.50       1.26       1,429,600  
May 2018     1.43       1.22       1,011,100  
June 2018     1.35       1.21       927,200  
July 2018     1.44       1.22       1,652,900  
August 2018     1.40       1.08       774,500  
September 2018     1.31       1.11       769,000  
October 2018     1.55       1.22       12,215,100  
November 2018     1.44       1.05       1,317,800  
December 2018     1.20       1.05       673,600  

 

The price of the Common Shares as quoted by the TSX at the close on December 31, 2018 was C$1.05 and on March 28, 2019 was C$1.04.

 

Page 64

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

  

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

 

NAME, OCCUPATION AND SECURITY HOLDING

 

The following table sets out the name, province or state, and country of residence of each current Director and executive officer of the Company, their respective positions held with the Company and their respective principal occupations during the preceding five years.

 

Name, Province and Country of
Residence, and Position
  Director
Since
  Principal Occupation for the Past Five Years
Jason D. Simpson
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Ontario, Canada
  November 2018   Director, President and Chief Executive of the Company since November 2018; Chief Operating Officer of Torex Gold Resources Inc. from January 2013 to November 2018.
         

Charles A. Jeannes 1, 2, 4

Director
(Non-Executive Chair of the Board of Directors)

Nevada, USA

  June 2017   Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors; Director of Tahoe Resources Inc. from January 2017 to February 2019; Director of Pan American Silver Corp. since February 2019 and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (formerly Silver Wheaton Corp.) since November 2016 (mining companies); former President and Chief Executive Officer of Goldcorp (mining company) from 2009 until April 2016, and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development from 2006 until 2008; serves as a University of Nevada, Reno (“UNR”) Foundation Trustee (a non-profit Board).
         

George Albino 1, 4

Director
Colorado, USA

  June 2017   Chairman of the Board of Eldorado Gold Corporation (mining company) since December 2017 and director since October 2016; Managing Director and Mining Analyst at GMP Securities, L.P., Research Division from 2010 until 2016.
         

Tim Haldane 3

Director
Arizona, USA

  June 2017   Mining professional with international project development experience; previously Senior Vice-President of Operations - USA and Latin America at Agnico Eagle (mining company) from 2014 until February 2017.
         

Richard Hall 2, 4

Director
Colorado, USA

  June 2015   Corporate Director, Geologist and Mineral Industry Consultant; Director at IAMGold Corporation from March 2012 to present, Kaminak Gold Corporation from February 2013 to July 2016 and Klondex Mines Ltd. (Chairman) from September 2014 to July 2018 (all mining companies).
         

Jean Robitaille 2, 3

Director
Ontario, Canada

  December 2016   Senior Vice-President, Business Strategy and Technical Services at Agnico Eagle (mining company) since 2014; 30 years at Agnico Eagle, including as Senior Vice-President, Technical Services and Project Development (2008 to 2013), Vice-President, Metallurgy and Marketing, General Manager, Metallurgy and Marketing and Mill Superintendent and Project Manager; prior to Agnico Eagle, Mr. Robitaille worked as a metallurgist with Teck Mining Group (mining company); director of Pershimco Resources Inc. (2011 to 2016).
         

Hans Smit 3

Chief Operating Officer and Director British Columbia, Canada

  June 2015   Director and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since June 2015; Vice President Exploration of Grayd Resource Corporation from 2003 to 2012; Professional Geologist and Mining Industry Consultant.
         

David Stephens 1

Director

Alberta, Canada

  March 2018   Vice President, Corporate Development and Marketing at Goldcorp (November 2017 to present), Vice President, Treasurer of Goldcorp (mining company) from March 2016 to November 2017, Director, Business Development of Goldcorp (February 2015 to March 2016) and Manager, Business Development of Goldcorp (January 2014 to February 2015); self-employed through his private consulting firm (September 2011 to December 2013; prior to this time, he spent 10 years working in investment banking and equity research at various organizations including Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd. and Orion Securities.
         
Etienne Morin
Chief Financial Officer
British Columbia, Canada
  April 2018   Chief Financial Officer of the Company since May 2018; Director, Investor Relations of Goldcorp (mining company) from June 2017 to May 2018; Director, Business Planning and Financial Evaluations of Goldcorp from March 2014 to September 2016; Director of Corporate Development of Goldcorp from January 2013 to April 2014 and from October 2016 to June 2017.

 

Notes:

(1) Member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Stephens is the Chairman of the Audit Committee.

(2) Member of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Hall is the Chairman of the Compensation Committee.

(3) Member of the Environmental, Health and Safety Committee. Mr. Haldane is the Chairman of the Environmental, Health and Safety Committee.

(4) Member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Mr. Albino is the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

   

  Page 65  

 

  

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Each Director’s term of office expires at the next annual meeting of shareholders of the Company or when his successor is duly elected or appointed, unless his term ends earlier in accordance with the articles or by-laws of the Company, he resigns from office or he becomes disqualified to act as a Director of the Company.

 

As at March 28, 2019, and based on the disclosure available on the System for Electronic Disclosure by Insiders (“SEDI”), the Directors and executive officers of the Company, as a group, beneficially own, directly or indirectly, or exercise control or direction over 9,337,950 Common Shares, representing approximately 5.2% of the total number of Common Shares outstanding before giving effect to the exercise of stock options, Restricted Share Units, Deferred Share Units or warrants to purchase Common Shares held by such Directors and executive officers.

  

  Page 66  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CEASE TRADE ORDERS, BANKRUPTCIES, PENALTIES OR SANCTIONS

 

To the knowledge of the Company and, except as set out below, none of the Directors or executive officers of the Company is, as at the date of this AIF, or was within ten years before the date of this AIF, a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of any company (including the Company), that: (a) was subject to a cease trade order or similar order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, which order was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days (an “Order”) that was issued while the director or executive officer was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer; or (b) was subject to an Order that was issued after the director or executive officer ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer.

 

In August 2014, Sonoma Resources Inc. (“Sonoma”), a reporting issuer in British Columbia and Alberta, was subject to a cease trade order imposed by the BCSC because Sonoma failed to file a comparative financial statement for the financial year ended March 31, 2014. Mr. Smit was a director of Sonoma at the time. Sonoma subsequently filed its financial statements for the periods ended March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014, September 30, 2014, and December 31, 2014, along with the related management discussion and analysis and certifications. In 2015, BCSC issued Revocation Orders allowing Sonoma to effect certain transactions to complete a reverse take-over with Element Lifestyle Retirement Inc.

 

None of the Directors or executive officers of the Company or, to the Company’s knowledge, any shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company have been subject to: (a) any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or have entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority, or (a) any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

 

None of the Directors or executive officers of the Company, or, to the Company’s knowledge, any shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company: (a) is, as at the date of this AIF, or has been within ten years before the date of this AIF, a director or executive officer of any company (including the Company) that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or (b) has, within the ten years before the date of this AIF, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of the director, executive officer or shareholder.

 

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

 

To the best of the Company’s knowledge, and other than as disclosed in this AIF, there are no known existing or potential conflicts of interest between the Company and any of the Company’s Directors or officers. However, certain of the Directors and officers of the Company are directors, officers and/or shareholders of other private and publicly listed companies, including companies that engage in mineral exploration and development and therefore it is possible that a conflict may arise between their duties to the Company and their duties to such other companies. All such conflicts will be dealt with pursuant to the provisions of the applicable corporate legislation and the Company’s Code. In the event that such a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the Directors, a Director affected by the conflict must disclose the nature and extent of his interest and abstain from voting for or against matters concerning the matter in respect of which the conflict arises. Directors and executive officers are required to disclose any conflicts or potential conflicts to the Board of Directors as soon as they become aware of them. See the section of this AIF entitled “Risk Factors – Conflicts of Interest”.

  

  Page 67  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS

 

There are no legal proceedings or regulatory actions involving Orla or its properties as at the date of this AIF, and Orla is not aware of any such proceedings or actions currently contemplated.

 

INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

 

Other than as disclosed in this AIF, no Director or executive officer of the Company, no person or company that beneficially owns, or controls or directs, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of any class or series of the Company’s outstanding voting securities and no associate or affiliate of any of such persons or companies has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction within the three most recently completed financial years or during the current financial year that has materially affected or is reasonably expected to materially affect the Company.

 

TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS

 

The transfer agent and registrar for the Common Shares is Computershare Investor Services Inc. at its principal offices in Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario.

 

The Warrant Agent for the 2018 Warrants is Computershare Trust Company of Canada at its principal offices in Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario.

 

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

 

Other than Ejido contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business and described in the “Mineral Projects” section of this AIF, the Company has not entered into any material contracts within the financial year ended December 31, 2018, or before such time, that are still in effect.

 

INTERESTS OF EXPERTS

 

QUALIFIED PERSONS UNDER NI 43-101

 

The following persons have been named as having prepared or certified a report, valuation, statement, or opinion described or included in a filing, or referred to in a filing, made under National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations during, or relating to, the Company’s financial year ended December 31, 2018:

 

Amended Camino Rojo Report – Carl E. Defilippi, RM, SME of KCA, Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. of RGI and Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM of IMC.

 

Cerro Quema Report – Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA; and

  

  Page 68  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

None of the foregoing persons, or any director, officer, employee, or partner thereof, as applicable, received or has received a direct or indirect interest in the Company’s property or the property of any of the Company’s associates or affiliates. Each of the aforementioned persons are independent of the Company and held an interest in either less than 1% or none of the Company’s securities or the securities of any associate or affiliate of the Company at the time of preparation of the respective reports and after the preparation of such reports and estimates, and they did not receive any direct or indirect interest in any of the Company’s securities or the securities of any associate or affiliate of the Company in connection with the preparation of the Report. None of the aforementioned persons nor any director, officer, employee, or partner, as applicable, of the aforementioned companies or partnerships is currently expected to be elected, appointed, or employed as a Director, officer or employee of the Company or of any associate or affiliate of the Company.

 

All scientific and technical information in this AIF has been reviewed and approved by Hans Smit, P.Geo., Chief Operating Officer, and a Director of the Company, who is a “Qualified Person” under NI 43-101. As of the date hereof, Hans Smit holds (i) 2,942,900 Common Shares, (ii) 100,000 warrants, (iii) 1,001,991 stock options and (iv) 120,000 RSUs of the Company.

 

AUDITORS

 

The Company’s independent auditors are Davidson and Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, who have issued an Independent Auditor’s Report dated March 18, 2019 in respect to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018. Davidson and Company LLP has advised the Company that they are independent with respect to the Company within the meaning of the Chartered Professional Accountants of British Columbia Code of Professional Conduct and the rules and standards of the PCAOB.

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION

 

The Audit Committee has the responsibility of, among other things: overseeing financial reporting, internal controls, the audit process and the establishment of “whistleblower” and related policies; recommending the appointment of the independent auditor and reviewing the annual audit plan and auditor compensation; pre-approving audit, audit related and tax services to be provided by the independent auditor; and reviewing and recommending approval to the Board of Directors of annual and quarterly financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis.

 

The Audit Committee’s charter sets out its responsibilities and duties, qualifications for membership, procedures and reporting to the Company’s Board of Directors. A copy of the charter is attached hereto as Schedule “A” to this AIF.

 

COMPOSITION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

The Audit Committee is comprised of three Directors. The following table sets out the name of each current Audit Committee member and whether they are “independent” and “financially literate”. To be considered independent, a member of the Audit Committee must not have any direct or indirect material relationship with the Company. A material relationship is a relationship which could, in the view of the Board, reasonably interfere with the exercise of a member’s independent judgement. To be considered financially literate, a member of the Audit Committee must have the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected by the Company’s financial statements.

 

  Page 69  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Name of Member   Independent   Financially Literate
David Stephens   Yes   Yes
George Albino   Yes   Yes
Charles A.  Jeannes   Yes   Yes

 

RELEVANT EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE

 

The education and experience of each Audit Committee member that is relevant to the performance of his or her responsibilities as an Audit Committee member and, in particular, any education or experience that would provide the member with: an understanding of the accounting principles used by Orla to prepare its financial statements; the ability to assess the general application of such accounting principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and provisions; experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by Orla’s financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities; and an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting, is set out below.

 

DAVID STEPHENS

 

Mr. Stephens joined the Board in March 2018. Mr. Stephens is currently the Vice President, Corporate Development and Marketing at Goldcorp, having previously served as Vice President and Treasurer. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Mr. Stephens spent ten years working in investment banking and equity research at various organizations including Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd. and Orion Securities. Mr. Stephens holds a bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Harvard University.

 

GEORGE ALBINO

 

Dr. Albino, Ph.D. was a Managing Director and Mining Analyst at GMP Securities, L.P., Research Division from 2010 until 2016. Prior to this, he was an Analyst at Macquarie Capital Markets Canada Ltd., Research Division from June 2002 until 2010, focusing on North American precious metal producers and exploration companies as well as base metal, uranium, and diamond companies. Dr. Albino has over 35 years of experience in mining and finance, having been a geologist for 18 years and as a highly-ranked sell side analyst covering mining (principally gold) stocks for 19 years. Before joining the financial services side of the business, he worked for 18 years in the mining industry, academia and government as an Exploration and Research Geologist exploring for precious metals, base metals, and diamonds. He is also currently Chairman of the Board of Eldorado Gold Corporation. Dr. Albino has a Ph.D. from the University of Western Ontario, an M.S. from the Colorado State University and a B.A.Sc. from Queen’s University.

 

CHARLES JEANNES

 

Mr. Jeannes served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Goldcorp from 2009 until April 2016, and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development from 2006 until 2008. From 1999 until the acquisition of Glamis Gold Ltd. (“Glamis”) by Goldcorp, he was Executive Vice President, Administration, General Counsel and Secretary of Glamis. Prior to joining Glamis, Mr. Jeannes worked for Placer Dome Inc., most recently as Vice President of Placer Dome North America. He is also currently a Director of Pan American Silver Corp. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (formerly Silver Wheaton Corp.) and serves as a UNR Foundation Trustee (a non-profit Board). He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from UNR and graduated from the University of Arizona School of Law with honours in 1983. He practiced law from 1983 until 1994 and has broad experience in capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, public and private financing, and international operations.

 

  Page 70  

 

  

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT

 

Since the commencement of Orla’s most recently completed financial year, there has not been a recommendation of the Audit Committee to nominate or compensate an external auditor which was not adopted by the Board of Directors.

 

RELIANCE ON CERTAIN EXEMPTIONS

 

At no time since the commencement of the Company’s most recently completed financial year has the Company relied on the exemption in Section 2.4, Section 3.2, Section 3.4, Section 3.5 or Section 3.8 of NI 52-110 or an exemption from NI 52-110, in whole or in part, granted under Part 8 of NI 52-110.

 

PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

 

The Audit Committee has established policies and procedures that are intended to control the services provided by the Company’s auditors and to monitor their continuing independence. Under these policies, no services may be undertaken by the Company’s auditors, unless the engagement is specifically approved by the Audit Committee or the services are included within a category that has been pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The maximum charge for services is established by the Audit Committee when the specific engagement is approved or the category of services pre-approved. Management is required to notify the Audit Committee of the nature and value of pre-approved services undertaken.

 

The Audit Committee will not approve engagements relating to, or pre-approve categories of, non-audit services to be provided by Orla’s auditors (i) if such services are of a type whereby the performance of which would cause the auditors to cease to be independent within the meaning of applicable rules, and (ii) without consideration, among other things, of whether the auditors are best situated to provide the required services and whether the required services are consistent with their role as auditor.

 

EXTERNAL AUDITOR SERVICE FEES

 

The aggregate fees billed by the Company’s external auditors in each of the last two financial years are as follows:

 

Financial Year Ended   Audit Fees 1     Audit-Related
Fees 2
    Tax Fees 3     All Other Fees 4  
December 31, 2018   $ 92,500     $ 31,000     $ 12,500       NIL  
December 31, 2017   $ 92,500       NIL     $ 20,939       NIL  

 

Notes:

 

(1) Fees billed by the Company’s auditor for audit services.

(2) Fees billed by the Company's external auditor for assurance-related services that are not included in “audit fees”. Such fees consist primarily of quarterly reviews and work related to providing consents pursuant to financings.

(3) Fees for professional services rendered by the Company’s external auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

(4) Fees for products and services provided by the Company’s external auditor, other than services reported under the table headings “Audit Fees”, “Audit-Related Fees” or “Tax Fees”.

  

  Page 71  

 

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

Additional information relating to the Company may be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the Company’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

Additional information, including Directors’ and officers’ remuneration and indebtedness, principal holders of the Company’s securities and securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, is contained in the Management Information Circular of the Company dated May 24, 2018 prepared for its most recent annual meeting of shareholders held on June 27, 2018 and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This information will also be contained in the Management Information Circular of the Company to be prepared in connection with the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of shareholders currently scheduled to be held in June 2019 which will be available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Additional financial information is provided in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and management discussion and analysis for the financial year ended December 31, 2018, which are filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

  

  Page 72  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

SCHEDULE “A”

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The primary responsibility of the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) is to oversee Orla Mining Ltd.’s (the, “Company” or “Orla”) financial reporting process on behalf of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) in order to assist the directors of the Company in meeting their responsibilities with respect to financial reporting by the Company.

 

Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation, and integrity of the Company's financial statements and for the appropriateness of the accounting principles and reporting policies that are used by the Company. The independent auditors are responsible for auditing the Company's annual financial statements.

 

1.             RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITY

 

The role, responsibility, authority, and power of the Committee includes, but is not be limited to the following:

 

(a) the Committee shall be directly responsible for the appointment and termination (subject to Board and shareholder ratification), compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditors, including resolution of disagreements between management and the independent auditors regarding financial reporting;

 

(b) the Committee shall ensure that at all times there are direct communication channels between the Committee and the internal auditors, if applicable, and the external auditors of the Company to discuss and review specific issues, as appropriate;

 

(c) the Committee shall discuss with the independent auditors (and internal auditors, if applicable) the overall scope and plans for their audits, including the adequacy of staff. The Committee shall discuss with management and the independent auditors the adequacy and effectiveness of the accounting and financial controls, including the Company's policies and procedures to assess, monitor, and manage business risk and legal risk;

 

(d) the Committee shall, at least annually, obtain and review a report by the independent auditors:

 

(i) describing their internal quality control procedures;

 

(ii) reviewing any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control review, or peer review, or any inquiry or investigation by a government or professional institute or society, within the preceding five years, respecting any independent audit carried out by the independent auditors, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues; and

 

(iii) outlining all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company in order to assess the auditor's independence;

 

(e) the Committee shall meet separately, on a regular basis, with management and the independent auditors to discuss any issues or concerns warranting Committee attention. As part of this process, the Committee shall provide sufficient opportunity for the independent auditors to meet privately with the Committee;

 

(f) the Committee shall receive regular reports from the independent auditors on critical policies and practices of the Company, including all alternative treatment of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles which have been discussed with management. Where alternative treatment exists, the independent auditors shall be invited to express their opinion as to whether the Company is using best practices;

  

  Page 73  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

(g) the Committee shall review management's assertion on its assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls as of the end of the most recent fiscal year and the independent auditors' report on management's assertion;

 

(h) the Committee shall review and discuss earnings press releases, as well as information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies;

 

(i) the Committee shall review the interim and annual financial statements and disclosures under management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations with management and the annual audited statements with the independent auditors, prior to recommending them to the Board for approval, release, or inclusion in any reports to shareholders and/or securities commissions;

 

(j) the Committee shall receive reports, if any, from corporate legal representatives of evidence of material violation of securities laws or breaches of fiduciary duty;

 

(k) the Committee shall review and ensure that procedures are in place for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting and auditing matters, as well as the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;

 

(l) the Committee shall meet as often as it deems appropriate to discharge its responsibilities and, in any event, at least four times per year. Additional meetings may be held as deemed necessary by the Chair of the Audit Committee (the “Chair”) or as requested by any Committee member or the external auditors or management;

 

(m) the Committee shall review all issues related to a change of auditor, including the information to be included in the notice of change of auditor and the planned steps for an orderly transition;

 

(n) the Committee shall pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided to the Company by the external auditors;

 

(o) the Committee shall review and approve the Company's policy with regard to the hiring of current and former partners or employees of the present and former external auditors;

 

(p) the Committee shall report on all the foregoing matters to the directors of the Company at the next Board meeting following;

 

(q) at all times, the membership of the Committee shall be such that:

 

(i) it shall be comprised of no fewer than three members;

 

(ii) the majority of the members thereof shall be “unrelated directors” or “independent” directors of the Company, as may be defined by the TSX Venture Exchange, the Ontario Securities Commission, or any other regulator to which the Company reports or may report in the future;

 

(iii) the majority of the members of the Committee shall be financially literate in terms of the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements;

 

(iv) no independent member of the Committee shall have a material business relationship with the Company;

 

(r) no business shall be transacted by the Committee except at a meeting of the members thereof at which;

 

(i) a majority of the members thereof are present;

 

(ii) a majority of the members thereof present are ''unrelated or independent directors” of the Company; or

  

  Page 74  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

(iii) by a resolution in writing signed by all of the members of the Committee;

 

(s) the minutes of all meetings of the Audit Committee shall be provided to the Board.

 

2.             CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

 

With regard to the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) and its Whistleblower Policy (the “Policy”) the Committee shall:

 

(a) review periodically and recommend to the Board any amendments to the Code and/or Policy and monitor the policies and procedures established by management to ensure compliance with the Code;

 

(b) review actions taken by management to ensure compliance with the Code and their response to any violations of the Code; and

 

(c) monitor the adequacy of the Code, any proposed amendments to the Code and any waivers of the Code granted by the Board.

 

3.             RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR

 

The fundamental responsibility of the Chair is to be responsible for the management and effective performance of the Committee and to provide leadership to the Committee in fulfilling its Charter and any other matters delegated to it by the Board. To that end, the Chair’s responsibilities shall include:

 

(a) working with the Chairman of the Board to establish the frequency of Committee meetings and the agendas for such meetings;

 

(b) providing leadership to the Committee and presiding over Committee meetings;

 

(c) facilitating the flow of information to and from the Committee and fostering and environment in which Committee members may ask questions and express their viewpoints;

 

(d) reporting to the Board with respect to significant activities of the Committee and any recommendations of the Committee;

 

(e) addressing, or causing to be addressed, all concerns communicated to the Chair under the Code and Policy;

 

(f) leading the Committee in annually reviewing and assessing the adequacy of its mandate and evaluating its effectiveness in fulfilling its mandate; and

 

(g) taking such other steps as are reasonably required to ensure that the Committee carries out its mandate.

 

4.            ADOPTION

 

The Charter was adopted by the Board on December 6, 2016.

 

  Page 75  

Exhibit 99.81

 

FORM 52-109F1 – IPO/RTO

CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FILINGS FOLLOWING

AN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING, REVERSE TAKEOVER OR

BECOMING A NON-VENTURE ISSUER

 

I, Jason Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended December 31, 2018.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

 

Date:     March 18, 2019    
     
/s/ Jason Simpson    
Jason Simpson    
Chief Executive Officer    

 

 

NOTE TO READER

 

In contrast to the usual certificate required for non-venture issuers under National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (NI 52-109), namely, Form 52-109F1, this Form 52-109F1 – IPO/RTO does not include representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in NI 52-109. In particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of

 

i) controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

ii) a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

The issuer’s certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to support the representations they are making in this certificate.

 

Investors should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying officers of an issuer to design and implement on a cost effective basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in NI 52-109 in the first financial period following

 

                completion of the issuer’s initial public offering in the circumstances described in s. 4.3 of NI 52-109;

                completion of a reverse takeover in the circumstances described in s. 4.4 of NI 52-109; or

                the issuer becoming a non-venture issuer in the circumstances described in s. 4.5 of NI 52-109;

 

may result in additional risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim and annual filings and other reports provided under securities legislation.

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.82

 

FORM 52-109F1 – IPO/RTO

CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FILINGS FOLLOWING

AN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING, REVERSE TAKEOVER OR

BECOMING A NON-VENTURE ISSUER

 

I, Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer of Orla Mining Ltd, certify the following:

 

1. Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Orla Mining Ltd (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended December 31, 2018.

 

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

 

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

 

Date:     March 18, 2019    
     
/s/ Etienne Morin    
Etienne Morin    
Chief Financial Officer    

 

NOTE TO READER

 

In contrast to the usual certificate required for non-venture issuers under National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (NI 52-109), namely, Form 52-109F1, this Form 52-109F1 – IPO/RTO does not include representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in NI 52-109. In particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of

 

i) controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

 

ii) a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

 

The issuer’s certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to support the representations they are making in this certificate.

 

Investors should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying officers of an issuer to design and implement on a cost effective basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in NI 52-109 in the first financial period following

 

                completion of the issuer’s initial public offering in the circumstances described in s. 4.3 of NI 52-109; 

                completion of a reverse takeover in the circumstances described in s. 4.4 of NI 52-109; or 

                the issuer becoming a non-venture issuer in the circumstances described in s. 4.5 of NI 52-109;

 

may result in additional risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim and annual filings and other reports provided under securities legislation.

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.83

 

FORM 13-502F1

 

CLASS 1 AND CLASS 3B REPORTING ISSUERS – PARTICIPATION FEE

 

MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

 

I, Etienne Morin , an officer of the reporting issuer noted below have examined this Form 13-502F1 (the Form) being submitted hereunder to the Ontario Securities Commission and certify that to my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the information provided in the Form is complete and accurate.

 

(s)_

"Etienne Morin"

  March 18, 2019
Name: Etienne Morin   Date:
Title: Chief Financial Officer    

 

Reporting Issuer Name: ORLA MINING LTD.  
     
End date of previous financial year: December 31, 2018  
     
Type of Reporting Issuer: Class 1 reporting issuer     Class 3B reporting issuer
     
Highest Trading Marketplace: TSX  
(refer to the definition of “highest trading marketplace” under OSC Rule 13-502 Fees)  
     
Market value of listed or quoted equity securities:  
(in Canadian Dollars - refer to section 7.1 of OSC Rule 13-502 Fees)  

 

Equity Symbol   OLA                                                      
     
1st Specified Trading Period (dd/mm/yy) (refer to the definition of “specified trading period” under OSC Rule 13-502 Fees)   01/01/2018               to _31/03/2018
 

Closing price of the security in the class or series on the last trading day of the specified trading period in which such security was listed or quoted

on the highest trading marketplace

 

 

$ 1.32                                                (i)

     
 

Number of securities in the class or series of such security outstanding at the end of the last trading day of the specified trading period

  178,557,615                                    (ii)
     
Market value of class or series   (i) x (ii)      $ 235,696,051.80                 (A)
     
2nd Specified Trading Period (dd/mm/yy) (refer to the definition of “specified trading period” under OSC Rule 13-502 Fees)    
    01/04/2018        to _30/06/2018       

 

 

 

 

Closing price of the security in the class or series on the last trading day of the specified trading period in which such security was listed or quoted on the highest trading marketplace                       $ 1.24                                (iii)
Number of securities in the class or series of such security outstanding at the end of the last trading day of the specified trading period                       179,214,615                     (iv)
     
Market value of class or series  (iii) x (iv)      $ 222,226,122.60              (B)
     
3rd Specified Trading Period (dd/mm/yy) (refer to the definition of “specified trading period” under OSC Rule 13-502 Fees)        01/07/2018              to   30/09/2018               
     
Closing price of the security in the class or series on the last trading day of the specified trading period in which such security was listed or quoted on the highest trading marketplace                       $ 1.26                                (v)
     
Number of securities in the class or series of such security outstanding at the end of the last trading day of the specified trading period                       179,214,615                     (vi)
     
Market value of class or series (v) x (vi)      $ 225,810,414.90                 (C)
     
4th Specified Trading Period (dd/mm/yy) (refer to the definition of “specified trading period” under OSC Rule 13-502 Fees)        01/10/2018               to _31/12/2018           
     
Closing price of the security in the class or series on the last trading day of the specified trading period in which such security was listed or quoted on the highest trading marketplace                       1.05                              (vii)
     
Number of securities in the class or series of such security outstanding at the end of the last trading day of the specified trading period                       179,314,615                   (viii)
     
Market value of class or series  (vii) x (viii)      $ 188,280,345.75              (D)
     
5th Specified Trading Period (dd/mm/yy) (if applicable - refer to the definition of “specified trading period” under OSC Rule 13-502 Fees)                            to                             
     
Closing price of the security in the class or series on the last trading day of the specified trading period in which such security was listed or quoted on the highest trading marketplace                        $                                  (ix) 
     
Number of securities in the class or series of such                                                                 (x)

 

 

 

 

security outstanding at the end of the last trading day of the specified trading period              
               
Market value of class or series   (ix) x (x)   $ - (E)  
               
Average Market Value of Class or Series (Calculate the simple average of the market value of the class or series of security for each applicable specified trading period (i.e. A through E above))       $ 218,003,233.75 (1)  

 

(Repeat the above calculation for each other class or series of equity securities of the reporting issuer (and a subsidiary pursuant to paragraph 2.8(1)(c) of OSC Rule 13-502 Fees, if applicable) that was listed or quoted on a marketplace at the end of the previous financial year)

 

 

Fair value of outstanding debt securities:

(See paragraph 2.8(1)(b), and if applicable, paragraph 2.8(1)(c) of OSC Rule 13-502 Fees)

      $ - (2)  
               
(Provide details of how value was determined)              
               
Capitalization for the previous financial year   (1) + (2)   $ 217,976,983.76    
               
Participation Fee       $ 13,340    
(For Class 1 reporting issuers, from Appendix A of OSC Rule 13-502 Fees, select the participation fee)              
               
(For Class 3B reporting issuers, from Appendix A.1 of OSC Rule  13-502 Fees, select the participation fee)              
               
Late Fee, if applicable              
(As determined under section 2.7 of OSC Rule 13-502 Fees)       $ -    
               
Total Fee Payable              
(Participation Fee plus Late Fee)       $ 13,340    

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.84

 

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

 

Presented in Canadian dollars

 

 

 

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

 

To the Shareholders of Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Opinion

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Company”), the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2018, 2017 and January 1, 2017 and the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 including a summary of significant accounting policies.

 

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Orla Mining Ltd. as at December 31, 2018, 2017 and January 1, 2017 and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).

 

Basis for Opinion

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the consolidated Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial statements in Canada, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

 

Other Information

 

Management is responsible for the other information. The other information obtained at the date of this auditor's report includes Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

 

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

 

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

 

We obtained Management’s Discussion and Analysis prior to the date of this auditor’s report. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

 

Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the consolidated Financial Statements

 

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

 

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

 

Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Company's financial reporting process.

 

 

 

 

Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the consolidated Financial Statements

 

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.

 

As part of an audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:

 

· Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
· Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control.
· Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.
· Conclude on the appropriateness of management's use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor's report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor's report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.
· Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
· Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Company to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.

 

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

 

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

 

The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Erez Bahar.

 

    “DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP”
     
Vancouver, Canada   Chartered Professional Accountants
     
March 18, 2019    

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    December 31     December 31     January 1  
As at   2018     2017     2017  
          restated
note 3(a)
    note 3(a)  
ASSETS                        
Current assets                        
Cash   $ 16,686     $ 6,142     $ 25,935  
Accounts receivable     385       149       409  
Prepaid expenses     206       771       359  
      17,277       7,062       26,703  
Reclamation deposits     205       188       201  
Value added taxes recoverable (note 8)     849       16        
Equipment (note 6)     344       234       418  
Exploration and evaluation assets (note 7)     169,282       155,241       110,938  
TOTAL ASSETS   $ 187,957     $ 162,741     $ 138,260  
                         
LIABILITIES                        
Current liabilities                        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 9)   $ 3,659     $ 2,257     $ 2,697  
      3,659       2,257       2,697  
Goldcorp loan (note 10)     6,103              
Site closure provisions (note 11)     745              
TOTAL LIABILITIES     10,507       2,257       2,697  
                         
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                        
Share capital     201,077       174,436       128,140  
Reserves     25,960       19,176       11,985  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss     4,797       (8,657 )     1,209  
Accumulated deficit     (54,384 )     (24,471 )     (5,771 )
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY     177,450       160,484       135,563  
                         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 187,957     $ 162,741     $ 138,260  

 

Nature and continuance of operations (note 1)

Events after the reporting period (note 20)

 

Authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors on March 18, 2019.

 

/s/  David Stephens   /s/  Jason Simpson
David Stephens, Director   Jason Simpson, Director

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Loss

(Thousands of Canadian dollars, except per-share amounts)

 

    Year ended December 31  
    2018     2017  
          restated,
note 3(a)
 
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENSES (note 7)                
Assays and analysis   $ 1,485     $ 236  
Drilling     3,007       1,858  
Geological     3,775       3,227  
Engineering     508        
Environmental     287        
Community and government     902       1,247  
Land and water use, claims and concessions     4,979        
Project management     351       28  
Project review     141       588  
Site activities     3,478       2,904  
Site administration     3,175       1,916  
Recognition of site closure provisions     745        
      22,833       12,004  
                 
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES                
Office and administrative     561       346  
Professional fees     593       297  
Regulatory and transfer agent     278       81  
Salaries and benefits     1,722       1,402  
      3,154       2,126  
                 
OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)                
Depreciation     153       189  
Share based payments (note 13)     3,985       3,698  
Interest income     (442 )     (187 )
Change in fair value of Goldcorp loan (note 10)     505        
Impairment of mineral property interests           261  
Foreign exchange loss (gain)     (275 )     562  
Other           47  
      3,926       4,570  
                 
LOSS FOR THE YEAR   $ 29,913     $ 18,700  
                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions)     176.7       126.3  
                 
Loss per share - basic and diluted   $ 0.17     $ 0.15  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(Thousands of Canadian dollars, except per-share amounts)

 

    Year ended December 31  
    2018     2017  
          restated,
note 3(a)
 
LOSS FOR THE YEAR   $ 29,913     $ 18,700  
                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME)                
Items that may in future periods be reclassified to profit or loss                
Foreign currency differences arising on translation of foreign operations     (13,454 )     9,866  
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS   $ 16,459     $ 28,566  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    Year ended December 31  
Cash flows provided by (used in):   2018     2017  
          restated
note 3(a)
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES                
Net income (loss) for the year   $ (29,913 )   $ (18,700 )
Adjustments for items not affecting cash:                
Depreciation     153       189  
Share based compensation     3,985       3,698  
Loan proceeds received in excess of fair value,
credited to exploration expense (note 10)
    (2,790 )      
Change in fair value of Goldcorp loan     505        
Changes in site closure provisions charged to exploration expense     745        
Impairment of mineral property interests           261  
Loss on disposal of equipment           27  
Changes in non-cash working capital:                
Accounts receivable     100       259  
Prepaid expenses     251       (435 )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     1,520       (391 )
Cash used in operating activities     (25,444 )     (15,092 )
                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES                
Proceeds on issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs     31,010       1,047  
Share issuance costs     (1,777 )      
Advances received on the Goldcorp loan (note 10)     8,204        
Cash provided by financing activities     37,437       1,047  
                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES                
Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets     (407 )     (5,516 )
Purchase of equipment     (234 )     (54 )
Value added taxes paid, not immediately recoverable     (807 )     (16 )
Cash used in investing activities     (1,448 )     (5,586 )
                 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash     (1 )     (162 )
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash     10,544       (19,793 )
Cash, beginning of year     6,142       25,935  
Cash, end of year   $ 16,686     $ 6,142  
                 
Cash consist of:                
Bank current accounts and cash on hand   $ 16,617     $ 6,119  
Short term highly liquid investments     69       23  
Cash   $ 16,686     $ 6,142  

 

Supplemental cash flow information (note 15)

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Thousands of Canadian dollars)

 

    Common shares     Reserves                    
    Number
of
shares
(thousands)
    Amount     Warrants     Options     RSUs,
DSUs, and
Bonus
shares
    Total     Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(restated –
note 3(a))
    Retained
earnings
(restated –
note 3(a))
    Total  
Balance at January 1, 2017
(restated, note 3)
    116,499     $ 128,140     $ 10,330     $ 1,655     $     $ 11,985     $ 1,209     $ (5,771 )   $ 135,563  
Shares issued for acquisition     31,860       44,604                                                 44,604  
Warrants issued for acquisition                 4,138                   4,138                   4,138  
Share based payments                       3,580       118       3,698                   3,698  
Exercise of stock options     374       559             (291 )           (291 )                 268  
Exercise of warrants     11,708       1,133       (354 )                 (354 )                 779  
Loss for the year                                               (18,700 )     (18,700 )
Other comprehensive loss                                         (9,866 )           (9,866 )
Balance at December 31, 2017     160,441     $ 174,436     $ 14,114     $ 4,944     $ 118     $ 19,176     $ (8,657 )   $ (24,471 )   $ 160,484  
                                                                         
Balance at January 1, 2018     160,441     $ 174,436     $ 14,114     $ 4,944     $ 118     $ 19,176     $ (8,657 )   $ (24,471 )   $ 160,484  
Private placement     17,581       27,803       2,964                   2,964                   30,767  
Share issue costs           (1,777 )                                         (1,777 )
Shares issued for debt settlement     148       207                                           207  
Exercise of stock options     657       249             (113 )           (113 )                 136  
Exercise of warrants     488       159       (52 )                 (52 )                 107  
Share based payments                       3,189       796       3,985                   3,985  
Loss for the year                                               (29,913 )     (29,913 )
Other comprehensive loss                                         13,454             13,454  
Balance at December 31, 2018     179,315     $ 201,077     $ 17,026     $ 8,020     $ 914     $ 25,960     $ 4,797     $ (54,384 )   $ 177,450  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION AND CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS

 

Orla Mining Ltd. was incorporated in Alberta in 2007 and was continued into British Columbia in 2010 and subsequently into Ontario under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) in 2014. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries.

 

The registered office of the Company is located at Suite 1240, 1140 West Pender Street, Vancouver, Canada.

 

The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties, and holds two material gold projects – the Camino Rojo gold and silver project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama. In January 2018, the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire up to 100% of the Monitor Gold exploration project in Nevada.

 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. Different bases of measurement may be appropriate if the Company is not expected to continue operations for the foreseeable future. As at December 31, 2018, the Company had not advanced any of its properties to commercial production and was not able to fund day-to-day activities through operating activities. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon successful results from our mineral exploration and development activities and our ability to attain profitable operations and generate cash, or raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations. We expect to fund operating costs of the Company over the next twelve months with cash on hand and with further equity financings.

 

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION

 

(a) Statement of compliance and basis of presentation

 

We have prepared these consolidated financial statements of the Company in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. They were prepared on a historical cost basis, except for certain non-current assets which were measured at fair value.

 

These consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars. Currency figures in tables are presented in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per-share amounts.

 

On March 18, 2019, the Board of Directors approved these consolidated financial statements for issuance.

 

(b) Basis of consolidation

 

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. Where necessary, we have made adjustments to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring their accounting policies in line with the accounting policies of the consolidated group. All significant intercompany transactions, balances, revenues, and expenses have been eliminated upon consolidation.

 

Subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial results of the Company from the effective date of acquisition or control and up to the effective date of disposition or loss of control. Control is achieved when the Company has power over the investee, is exposed to or has rights to variable returns from its involvement with an investee, and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee.

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Orla Mining Ltd. is the ultimate parent entity of the group. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the principal subsidiaries of the Company, their geographic locations, and the ownership interests held by the Company, were as follows:

 

        Ownership      
Name   Principal activity   Dec 31,
2018
    Dec 31,
2017
    Location
CR Acquisitions Ltd.   Holding company     100 %     100 %   Canada
Minerometalurgica San Miguel S de RL de CV   Exploration     100 %     100 %   Mexico
Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV   Exploration     100 %     100 %   Mexico
Contrataciones Camino Rojo SA de CV   Services provider     100 %         Mexico
Servicios Administrativos Camino Rojo SA de CV   Services provider     100 %         Mexico
Minera Cerro Quema SA   Exploration     100 %     100 %   Panama
Aurum Exploration Inc.   Exploration     100 %     100 %   Panama
Monitor Gold Corporation   Exploration     100 %     100 %   USA

 

(c) Foreign currencies

 

(i) Functional currency

 

The functional currencies of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned, are as follows:

 

Orla Mining Ltd.   Canadian dollars
CR Acquisitions Ltd.   Canadian dollars
Minerometalurgica San Miguel S de RL de CV   Mexican pesos
Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV   Mexican pesos
Contrataciones Camino Rojo SA de CV   Mexican pesos
Servicios Administrativos Camino Rojo SA de CV   Mexican pesos
Minera Cerro Quema SA   United States dollars
Aurum Exploration Inc.   United States dollars
Monitor Gold Corporation   United States dollars

 

(ii) Foreign currency transactions

 

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into the respective functional currencies of each company at the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the transactions.

 

Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate at the reporting date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate when the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items that are measured at historical cost in a foreign currency are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency differences are generally recognized in profit or loss.

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(iii) Translation of foreign operations

 

The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into Canadian dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the reporting date. The results of operations of foreign operations are translated into Canadian dollars at the average exchange rates in effect during the reporting period. We recognize the foreign currency differences arising from translation in other comprehensive income within the translation reserve.

 

When we dispose of a foreign operation in its entirety, or partially such that control is lost, we reclassify the cumulative amount in the translation reserve related to that foreign operation to profit or loss as part of the gain or loss on disposal.

 

3. CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

We have applied the accounting policies set out in note 4 consistently to all periods presented in these financial statements, except as described in notes 3(a) and 3(b).

 

The significant judgements we made in applying the Company’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty arising in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are discussed in note 5.

 

(a) Changes in accounting policies

 

(i) Exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) expenditures

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to capitalize exploration and evaluation expenditures. In preparation for the possible construction and operation of our mineral projects, we have updated our policy with respect to such expenditures. The new policy is to expense such expenditures as incurred. Specific details of the new policy are explained in note 4(d).

 

We believe that the information provided by this policy change will be more useful to readers because it provides better comparability of our financial position, changes in financial position, and results of operations with those of our current and future peer groups. Consequently, the revised treatment results in more relevant and no less reliable information than was previously presented. We have applied this change in accounting policy retrospectively, in accordance with IAS 8 «Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors».

 

(ii) Site-related administrative costs

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to include site-related administrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel within “general and administrative expenses”. We believe it is more meaningful to readers to present these costs within exploration expenditures as they directly relate to conducting the exploration and evaluation activities at our mineral projects and are not activities directly related to the functioning of the corporation as a whole. Accordingly, these costs are now presented in “exploration and evaluation expenses”.

 

This policy change is more useful to readers because it provides more meaningful information about our financial position, changes in financial position, and results of operations. Consequently, the revised treatment results in more relevant and no less reliable information than was previously presented. We have applied this change in accounting policy retrospectively, in accordance with IAS 8.

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(iii) Site-related VAT recoverable amounts

 

The Company’s previous accounting policy was to include site-related value-added taxes (“VAT”) recoverable, such as Mexican IVA, within “exploration and evaluation assets”. As these amounts are recoverable with the filing of government-prescribed documentation, we believe it is more meaningful to readers to present these amounts as receivables, with appropriate current and long term classification. As the Company has no history of recovering IVA, and consequently, timing of receipt is uncertain, we have presented all IVA recoverable as long term. The IVA paid upon the initial acquisition of the Camino Rojo Project continues to be carried as part of acquisition costs.

 

Readers will find this policy change more useful because it provides more meaningful information about our financial position, changes in financial position, and results of operations. Consequently, the revised treatment results in more relevant and no less reliable information than was previously presented. We have applied this change in accounting policy retrospectively, in accordance with IAS 8.

 

(iv) Corporate administrative costs

 

As a result of the reclassifications in note (ii) above, corporate “rent”, “public and community relations”, and “travel” were not material. Consequently, we grouped them within “office and administrative” expenses.

 

(v) Effects of these changes in accounting policies

 

The effects of the above changes on our financial position, changes in financial position, and results of operation are presented here:

 

    December 31
2017
    January 1
2017
 
Effect on balance sheet of changes in accounting policies                
E&E assets:                
As originally presented   $ 164,561     $ 111,726  
Cumulative effect of change in policy prior to January 1, note (i)     (788 )     (788 )
Site-related adminstrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel, note (ii)     2,565        
Reclassification of VAT recoverable, note (iii)     (16 )      
E&E charged to expenses, note (i)     (11,081 )      
As restated   $ 155,241     $ 110,938  
                 
Accumulated other comprehensive income:                
As originally presented   $ (8,840 )   $ 1,286  
Cumulative effect of change in policy prior to January 1, note (i)     (77 )     (77 )
E&E charged to expenses, note (i)     260        
As restated   $ (8,657 )   $ 1,209  

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

    December 31
2017
    January 1
2017
 
Retained earnings (deficit):                
As originally presented   $ (14,984 )   $ (5,059 )
Cumulative effect of change in policy prior to January 1, 2017, note (i)     (712 )     (712 )
Reduction of impairment of E&E assets during 2017, note (i)     334        
Site-related adminstrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel, note (ii)     2,565        
E&E charged to expenses, note (i)     (11,674 )      
As restated   $ (24,471 )   $ (5,771 )

 

    Year ended
December 31
2017
 
Effect on income statement of changes in accounting policies        
Exploration and evaluation expenses (“E&E”):        
As originally presented   $ 511  
E&E charged to expenses, note (i)     11,493  
As restated   $ 12,004  
         
Office and administration expenses:        
As originally presented   $ 771  
Site-related adminstrative costs reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (639 )
Corporate public and community relations reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     66  
Corporate rent reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     24  
Corporate travel reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     124  
As restated   $ 346  
         
Professional fees:        
As originally presented   $ 597  
Site-related professional fees reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (300 )
As restated   $ 297  
         
Public and community relations:        
As originally presented   $ 649  
Site-related public and community relations costs reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (583 )
Corporate public and community relations reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (66 )
As restated   $  

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

    Year ended
December 31
2017
 
Rent:        
As originally presented   $ 92  
Site-related rent reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (68 )
Corporate rent reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (24 )
As restated   $  
         
Salaries and benefits:        
Originally presented as management and directors’ fees   $ 1,133  
Originally presented as salaries and benefits     970  
As originally presented, combined     2,103  
Site-related salaries and benefits reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (701 )
As restated   $ 1,402  
         
Travel:        
As originally presented   $ 397  
Site-related travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (273 )
Corporate travel reclassifed to office and administrative (note (iv))     (124 )
As restated   $  
         
Effect on cash flow statement of changes in accounting policies        
Cash used in operating activities:        
As originally presented   $ (6,163 )
Site-related adminstrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     2,565  
E&E charged to expenses, note (i)     (11,674 )
Depreciation included in E&E     180  
As restated   $ (15,092 )
         
Cash used in investing activities:        
As originally presented   $ (14,515 )
Site-related adminstrative costs, professional fees, rent, administrative salaries, and travel reclassified to E&E, note (ii)     (2,565 )
E&E charged to expenses, excluding depreciation of $180, note (i)     11,494  
As restated   $ (5,586 )

 

There were no changes in cash flows provided by financing activities.        

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Accounting policies adopted in the current year

 

(i) Financial Instruments

 

Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted a new standard, IFRS 9 «Financial Instruments», retrospectively.

 

IFRS 9 introduced a revised model for classification and measurement. IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is classified and measured at amortized cost or fair value, replacing the multiple rules in IAS 39 «Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement». The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset. For financial liabilities, IFRS 9 retains most of the IAS 39 requirements.

 

We completed an assessment of our financial instruments as at January 1, 2018, and determined that neither the classifications used for, nor the measurement of, our financial instruments were materially impacted by adopting this standard. The adoption of this new standard had no material impact on the financial position, changes in financial position, or results of operations in any period previously presented.

 

IFRS 9 amends some of the requirements of IFRS 7 «Financial Instruments: Disclosures», and now includes added disclosures about investments in equity instruments measured at FVOCI, and guidance on the measurement of financial liabilities and the derecognition of financial instruments.

 

The following table shows the original IAS 39 classification and the new IFRS 9 classification:

 

    IAS 39   IFRS 9
Financial assets:        
   Cash   FVTPL   FVTPL
   Accounts receivable   Loans and receivables   Amortized cost
         
Financial liabilities:        
   Accounts payable   Amortized cost   Amortized cost

 

As a result of the adoption of IFRS 9, we updated our accounting policy for financial instruments. You can find a detailed description of our accounting policy for financial instruments in note 4(b).

 

(ii) Revenue from Contracts with Customers

 

The new accounting standard, IFRS 15 «Revenue from Contracts with Customers», contains a single model that applies to contracts with customers and two approaches to recognizing revenue: at a point in time or over time. The model features a contract-based five-step analysis of transactions to determine whether, and if so, how much and when revenue is recognized. New estimates and judgmental thresholds have also been introduced, which may affect the amounts or timing of revenue recognized.

 

We adopted IFRS 15 and its related clarifications effective January 1, 2018.

 

The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the financial position, changes in financial position or results of operations of the Company.

 

  Page 15  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

4. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

(a) Business combinations

 

We account for business combinations using the acquisition method. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the consideration transferred, measured at fair value at the acquisition date. Acquisition-related transaction costs are expensed as incurred.

 

The excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed is charged to acquisition cost of the related mineral properties acquired. If the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the consideration transferred, we recognize the gain in profit or loss.

 

Contingent consideration is measured at fair value at the acquisition date. If an obligation to pay contingent consideration that meets the definition of a financial instrument is classified as equity, then it is not remeasured and when settled it is accounted for within equity. Otherwise, contingent consideration is remeasured at fair value at each reporting date and the changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration are recognized in profit or loss.

 

The results of operations of entities acquired during the reporting period are recorded in the consolidated financial statements from the date control is acquired.

 

The results of operations of entities sold or over which we’ve lost control during the reporting period are included in the consolidated financial statements for the period up to the date the control ceases. When we lose control over a subsidiary, we derecognize the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary. Any resulting gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss. We measure any remaining interest in the former subsidiary at fair value when control is lost.

 

(b) Financial instruments

 

(i) Financial assets

 

We initially recognize financial assets when the Company becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Subsequent to initial recognition, we classify financial assets as measured at amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVOCI”) or fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”) after considering both our business model for managing the financial asset and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset.

 

A financial asset is measured at amortized cost if both of the following conditions are met:

 

a. the asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets in order to collect contractual cash flows, and

 

b. the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.

 

A financial asset is measured at FVOCI if both of the following conditions are met:

 

a. the financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets, and

 

  Page 16  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

b. the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.

 

We may make an irrevocable election at initial recognition to carry at FVOCI particular investments in equity instruments that would otherwise be measured at FVTPL.

 

A financial asset is required to be measured at FVTPL unless it is measured at amortized cost or at FVOCI.

 

As an exception to the rules above, we may, at initial recognition, irrevocably designate a financial asset as measured at FVTPL if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency (“accounting mismatch”) that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognizing the gains and losses on them on different bases.

 

If we change our business model for managing financial assets, we reclassify all affected financial assets on a prospective basis, without restating any previously recognized gains, losses or interest.

 

If the asset is reclassified to fair value, we determine the fair value at the reclassification date, and recognize in profit or loss any gain or loss arising from a difference between the previous carrying amount and fair value.

 

An embedded derivative is a component of a hybrid contract that also includes a non-derivative host, with the effect that some of the cash flows of the combined instrument vary in a way similar to a stand-alone derivative. A derivative that is attached to a financial instrument but is contractually transferable independently of that instrument, or has a different counterparty, is not an embedded derivative, and is treated as a separate financial instrument.

 

Upon initial recognition, we measure a financial asset at its fair value. However, we measure trade receivables that do not have a significant financing component at their transaction price. After initial recognition, we measure financial assets at amortized cost, FVOCI, or FVTPL.

 

Changes in fair value of a financial asset that is carried at FVTPL are recognized in profit or loss, and changes in fair value of a financial asset that is carried at FVOCI are recognized in other comprehensive income, unless it is part of a hedging relationship.

 

We apply the impairment requirements to financial assets that are measured at amortized cost and to those that are measured at FVOCI. We apply the hedge accounting requirements to all financial assets that are designated as hedged items. We have not had any hedges in any prior years or the current year.

 

Gains or losses on a financial asset that is carried at FVTPL are recognized in profit or loss, and gains or losses on a financial asset that is carried at FVOCI are recognized in other comprehensive income, unless it is part of a hedging relationship. A gain or loss on a financial asset that is measured at amortized cost and is not part of a hedging relationship is recognized in profit or loss when the asset is derecognized, impaired, amortized, or reclassified.

 

(ii) Financial liabilities

 

We initially recognize financial liabilities when the Company becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. At initial recognition, we measure each financial liability at its fair value minus, in the case of a financial liability not at FVTPL, transaction costs that are directly attributable to the issue of the financial liability.

 

  Page 17  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Subsequent to initial recognition, we classify and measure all financial liabilities at amortized cost using the effective interest method, except for:

 

a. financial liabilities at FVTPL;

 

b. financial liabilities that arise when a transfer of a financial asset does not qualify for derecognition or when the continuing involvement approach applies;

 

c. financial guarantee contracts;

 

d. commitments to provide a loan at a below-market interest rate; and

 

e. contingent consideration recognized when we are the acquirer in a business combination.

 

We apply the hedge accounting requirements to all financial liabilities that are designated as hedged items. We have not had any hedges in any prior years or the current year.

 

We may, at initial recognition, irrevocably designate a financial liability as measured at FVTPL.

 

Gains or losses on a financial liability that is measured at fair value and is not part of a hedging relationship are recognized in profit or loss. A gain or loss on a financial liability that is measured at amortized cost and is not part of a hedging relationship is recognized in profit or loss when the financial liability is derecognized or amortized.

 

We present a gain or loss on a financial liability designated as FVTPL as follows:

 

a. the amount of change in the fair value of the financial liability that is attributable to changes in the credit risk of that liability is presented in other comprehensive income; and

 

b. the remaining amount of change in the fair value of the liability is presented in profit or loss.

 

(iii) Impairment

 

We recognize a loss allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets, based on expected credit losses.

 

(c) Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits, and money market instruments, with maturities from the date of acquisition of three months or less, which are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and are subject to insignificant changes in value.

 

(d) Exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) expenditures

 

Exploration and evaluation expenditures include the search for mineral resources, the determination of technical feasibility, and assessment of the commercial viability of an identified mineral resource. Activities include acquisition of rights to explore; topographical, geological, geochemical and geophysical studies; exploratory drilling; trenching; sampling; and evaluation of the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource.

 

We capitalize E&E assets acquired in a business combination, and also the initial acquisition costs of an E&E asset which does not represent a business. We capitalize high value equipment and infrastructure, because of the long order times necessary to secure such equipment. All other E&E expenditures are expensed. Non-refundable advance royalty payments are expensed.

 

  Page 18  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Capitalized E&E assets are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated impairment.

  

At the end of the reporting period when the technical feasibility and economic viability of a project are demonstrable, and a positive development decision is made, E&E assets are tested for impairment and transferred to “Projects under development and construction”. Subsequent expenditures on the project are capitalized.

 

We assess E&E assets for impairment when indicators and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may exceed its recoverable amount. Typical indicators of impairment include:

 

· Substantive expenditure or further exploration and evaluation activities is neither budgeted nor planned;

 

· Title to the asset is compromised, has expired or is expected to expire;

 

· Adverse changes in the taxation, regulatory or political environment;

 

· Adverse changes in variables in commodity prices and markets making the project not viable; and

 

· Adverse changes in the exchange rate for the currency of operation, making the project not viable.

 

If any such indication exists, we estimate the recoverable amount of the asset to determine the extent of the impairment. Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, we estimate the recoverable amount of the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, we discount the estimated future cash flows to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the E&E asset. If the recoverable amount of an asset is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, we recognize an impairment loss in profit or loss for the period.

 

Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but to an amount that does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset (or cash generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in profit or loss.

 

(e) Projects under development and construction

 

Costs directly related to development or construction projects are capitalized to “Projects under development and construction” until the asset is available for use in the manner intended by management. These capitalized amounts are reduced by the proceeds from the sale of metals extracted prior to commercial production. Any costs incurred in testing the assets to determine if they are functioning as intended are also capitalized.

 

When commercial production starts, assets included in “Projects under development and construction” are transferred to “Mineral properties” and “Plant and equipment” as appropriate.

 

(f) Plant and equipment

 

Equipment is initially recognized at cost. Cost includes purchase price, directly attributable costs, and the estimated present value of any future costs of decommissioning and removal.

 

  Page 19  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

Plant and equipment are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairments. We depreciate property, plant, and equipment to their residual values on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, typically as follows:

 

Equipment and office equipment        5 years
Vehicles        4 years
Computer hardware and software        3 years

 

Projects under development and construction are not depreciated.

 

(g) Borrowing costs

 

Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use (a “qualifying asset”) are capitalized as part of the cost of that asset. Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that we incur in connection with the borrowing of funds.

 

Where funds are borrowed specifically to finance a project, the amount capitalized represents the actual borrowing costs incurred, net of income generated from the temporary investment of such amounts. Where the funds used to finance a project form part of general borrowings, the amount capitalized is calculated using a weighted average of rates applicable to relevant general borrowings during the reporting period.

 

All other borrowing costs are recognized in profit or loss when incurred. Borrowing costs related to exploration and evaluation are expensed as incurred.

 

(h) Asset retirement and site closure obligations

 

We record an asset retirement and site closure obligation when a legal or constructive obligation exists as a result of past events and we can make a reliable estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows required to satisfy the asset retirement and site closure obligation. Such costs include decommissioning or dismantling plant and equipment, and reclamation, closure, and post-closure monitoring of the property.

 

The estimated future cash flows are discounted to a net present value using an applicable country-specific risk-free interest rate. We accrete the provision for asset retirement and site closure obligations over time to reflect the unwinding of the discount, and charge the accretion expense to profit or loss for the period.

 

We remeasure the asset retirement and site closure obligation at the end of each reporting period for changes in estimates or circumstances, such as changes in legal or regulatory requirements, increased obligations arising from additional disturbance due to mining and exploration activities, changes to cost estimates, and changes to risk-free interest rates.

 

Asset retirement and site closure obligations related to E&E activities and properties are expensed upon initial recognition and subsequently. Asset retirement and site closure obligations relating to Projects under development and construction, and to mineral properties, are initially capitalized with a charge to the related mineral property. Changes to the obligation which arise as a result of changes in estimates and assumptions are also accounted for as changes in the carrying amounts of related mining property.

 

  Page 20  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(i) Provisions

 

We recognize provisions when (i) the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, (ii) it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and (iii) we can make a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation. Where we expect some or all of a provision to be reimbursed (for example, under an insurance contract), we recognize the reimbursement as a separate asset, but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. We present the expense relating to each provision in profit or loss net of any reimbursements.

 

If the effect of the time value of money is material, we discount the provision using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the risks specific to the liability. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as accretion expense in profit or loss.

 

(j) Flow through shares

 

The Company has, in the past, issued flow-through shares (as defined in Canadian tax legislation) to finance some of its exploration programs. Pursuant to the tax rules and the terms of the flow-through share agreements, these shares transfer the tax deductibility of qualifying mineral exploration expenditures to investors.

 

The Company splits the proceeds received from flow-through equity financings into two components – a liability portion and share capital. The liability, which represents the obligation to incur eligible exploration expenditures and renounce those costs to investors, is calculated as the excess of cash consideration received over the market price of the Company’s shares on the agreement’s closing date. As qualifying exploration expenditures are renounced, the Company derecognizes the liability and recognizes it through profit or loss as net finance cost.

 

A deferred tax asset or liability is recognized for the taxable temporary difference that arises from the difference between the carrying amount of qualifying expenditures and their tax basis. The deferred tax impact is recorded as qualifying expenditures are renounced.

 

(k) Share based payments

 

(i) Stock options, restricted share units (“RSUs”) and deferred share units (“DSUs”)

 

The Company grants stock options, and awards RSUs and DSUs to employees, officers and directors from time to time. At the date of grant or award, we estimate the fair values of the stock options, RSUs and DSUs which will eventually vest. These estimated fair values are recognized as share based compensation expense over the specific vesting periods, with a corresponding increase to reserves, a component of equity.

 

We determine the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with market-related inputs as of the date of grant. The fair value of RSUs and DSUs is the market value of the underlying shares as of the date of award. Stock option grants and RSU awards with several tranches of vesting are accounted for as separate awards with different vesting periods and fair values. We account for prospectively the changes to the estimated number of awards that will eventually vest.

 

(ii) Bonus shares

 

The Company has issued bonus shares, some of which vest upon the completion of a specified period of service, and others of which vest upon the achievement of specific performance conditions, which performance conditions may or may not be market based. The fair value of the bonus shares is determined on the date of award.

 

  Page 21  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

For bonus shares which have only a service condition, the fair value is recognized in share based compensation expense over the service period.

 

For bonus awards which have a performance condition, we estimate at the award date the length of the expected vesting period, and recognize the fair value in share based compensation expense over that expected vesting period. If the performance condition is a market condition, we do not subsequently revise the expected vesting period. However, if the performance condition is not a market condition, we revise our estimate of the length of the vesting period if subsequent information indicates such a revision is necessary.

 

(l) Income taxes

 

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. It is recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination or items recognized directly in equity or OCI.

 

(i) Current tax

 

Current tax expense comprises the expected tax payable on taxable income for the year and any adjustment to income tax payable in respect of previous years. It is measured using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current tax also includes any withholding tax arising from interest and dividends.

 

(ii) Deferred tax

 

Deferred tax is recognized in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognized for:

 

· temporary differences on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination, and at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit (tax loss);

 

· temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements to the extent that we are able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future; and

 

· taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill.

 

We recognize deferred tax assets for unused tax losses, unused tax credits and deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be used. If the amount of taxable temporary differences is insufficient to recognize a deferred tax asset in full, then future taxable profits are considered based on the business plans for the individual taxable entity. We review deferred tax assets at each reporting date and reduce them when we consider it no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized. Unrecognized deferred tax assets are reassessed at each reporting date and recognized to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be used.

 

Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the temporary differences when they reverse, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset only when there are sufficient taxable temporary differences relating to the same taxation authority and the same taxable entity which are expected to reversed in the same period or in the carried back/forward period as the expected reversal of the deductible temporary difference.

 

  Page 22  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(m) Earnings (loss) per share

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share is based on profit (loss) attributable to common shareholders, divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period.

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on profit (loss) attributable to common shareholders, divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period after adjusting for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares.

 

(n) New accounting standards not yet adopted

 

In January 2016, the International Accounting Standards Board published a new standard, IFRS 16 «Leases», eliminating the current dual accounting model for lessees, which distinguishes between on-balance sheet finance leases and off-balance sheet operating leases. The new standard provides a single lessee accounting model, requiring lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases unless the lease term is 12 months or less or the underlying asset has a very low value. Under the new standard, a lease becomes an on-balance sheet liability that attracts interest, together with a new right-of-use asset. In addition, lessees will recognize a front-loaded pattern of expense for most leases, even when cash rental payments are constant. IFRS 16 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019.

 

To prepare for this standard, we built a database of existing agreements which may contain leases as defined in the new standard, and reviewed contracts which may be affected by the change. We availed ourselves of the recognition exemptions permitted in the standard (by excluding low value leases and short term leases), and concluded that we have no leases requiring recognition pursuant to the new standard. Consequently, we expect no material effects of this new standard to our financial position, changes in financial position, and results of operations.

 

We will apply this new standard retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application, namely January 1, 2019.

 

5. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS AND ESTIMATES

 

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

We review estimates and underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.

 

Judgements, estimates, and assumptions that we have made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in these consolidated financial statements include:

 

  Page 23  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(a) Functional currency

  

The functional currency for the parent entity and each of its subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of functional currency involves judgements to identify the primary economic environment. We reconsider the functional currency of each entity if there is a change in the underlying transactions, events and conditions which we used to determine the primary economic environment of that entity.

 

(b) Business combinations

 

Determining whether a set of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute the acquisition of a business or the acquisition of an asset requires us to make certain judgements as to whether or not the assets acquired and liabilities assumed include the inputs, processes and outputs necessary to constitute a business as defined in IFRS 3 «Business Combinations». If an acquired set of assets and liabilities includes goodwill, the set is presumed to be a business. Based on an assessment of relevant facts and circumstances, management of the Company concluded that the acquisitions of Cerro Quema in 2016 and of Camino Rojo in 2017 were acquisitions of assets. The values assigned to common shares, stock options and warrants issued and the allocation of the purchase price to the net assets in the acquisition were based on estimates and judgements including discount rates, volatility, expected option and warrant lives and the relative fair values of the net assets.

 

(c) Exploration and evaluation expenditures

 

The application of the Company’s accounting policy for E&E expenditure requires judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely from either future exploitation or sale (prior to which we expense all E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we capitalize the acquisition costs). It also requires us to make judgements on whether activities have reached a stage that permits development of the mineral resource (prior to which they are treated as E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we treat such costs as projects under development and construction).

 

We must also apply a number of estimates and assumptions, such as the determination of the quantities and types of mineral resources, which itself involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on resource classification (measured, indicated or inferred). These estimates directly impact accounting decisions related to our E&E expenditures.

 

We must make certain estimates and assumptions about future events and circumstances, particularly, whether economic mineral exploitation is viable. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, we assess indicators of impairment and may conclude to write off such amounts to the statement of profit or loss.

 

(d) Title to mineral properties

 

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. Further, we make judgements for properties where concessions terms have expired, and a renewal application has been made and is awaiting approval. We use judgement as to whether the concession renewal application is probable to be received, but ultimately this is beyond our control. If a renewal application is not approved, we could lose rights to those concession.

 

  Page 24  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(e) Assessment of impairment indicators

 

We apply judgement in assessing whether indicators of impairment or reverse impairment exist for our E&E assets which could result in a test for impairment. We consider internal and external factors, such as our rights to explore, planned expenditures on E&E activities, the technical results of our E&E activities, and the potential for viable operations, to determine whether there are any indicators of impairment or reversal of a previous impairment.

 

(f) Share based payments

 

We issue, grant or award different types of share based payments. These include warrants, options, restricted share units, deferred share units, and bonus shares.

 

We make judgments of expected forfeiture rates, the expected lives of these instruments, expected volatilities, and risk free interest rates. In a unit offering, we prorate the proceeds between common shares and warrants using the relative fair value method, the allocation of which requires significant judgement. In the case of bonus shares we use our judgement to estimate expected vesting periods and vesting probabilities.

 

(g) Fair value measurement

 

Management uses valuation techniques in measuring the fair value of share options granted and restricted share units, deferred share units, and bonus shares awarded. Such valuation techniques are also used for estimating the fair value of the Goldcorp loan, which is interest free.

 

We determine the fair value of share based payments awarded using the Black Scholes option pricing model which requires us to make certain estimates, judgements, and assumptions in relation to the expected life of the share options, expected volatility, expected risk-free rate, and expected forfeiture rate. Determining the fair value of the Goldcorp loan requires us to make estimates of applicable discount rates.

 

Changes to these assumptions could have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

(h) Site closure provisions

 

We make estimates and assumptions in determining the provisions for asset retirement and site closure. The ultimate rehabilitation costs are uncertain, and cost estimates can vary in response to many factors, including judgements of the extent of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, and regulatory changes. We make estimates of rehabilitation costs and of cost increases, inflation rates, and discount rates. These uncertainties will result in actual future expenditures differing from the amounts currently provided.

 

Consequently, there could be significant adjustments to the provisions established, which would affect future financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position.

 

(i) Deferred income taxes

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial statement values and tax values of assets, liabilities, loss carry forwards and other temporary differences. We make certain assumptions about the future performance of the Company and use judgement to determine the ability of the Company to utilize tax loss carry-forwards and other deferred tax assets. We must assess whether it is “probable” that the Company will benefit from these prior losses and other deferred tax assets.

 

Changes in economic conditions, metal prices and other factors could result in revisions to our estimates of the benefits to be realized, or the timing of those potential economic benefits.

 

  Page 25  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

6. EQUIPMENT

 

    Equipment     Office equipment     Computer equipment     Vehicles     Total  
Cost                                        
At January 1, 2017   $ 259     $ 10     $ 86     $ 81     $ 436  
Additions     33       4       18             55  
Disposals                       (50 )     (50 )
Effect of movements in exchange rates     (20 )     (1 )     (6 )     (4 )     (31 )
At December 31, 2017     272       13       98       27       410  
Additions     127       29       78             234  
Effect of movements in exchange rates     28       2       9       2       41  
At December 31, 2018   $ 427     $ 44     $ 185     $ 29     $ 685  
                                         
Accumulated depreciation                                        
At January 1, 2017   $ 10     $ 1     $ 4     $ 3     $ 18  
Charged in the year     113       7       44       25       189  
Disposals                       (23 )     (23 )
Effect of movements in exchange rates     (4 )     (1 )     (2 )     (1 )     (8 )
At December 31, 2017     119       7       46       4       176  
Charged in the year     82       9       51       11       153  
Effect of movements in exchange rates     6       1       4       1       12  
At December 31, 2018   $ 207     $ 17     $ 101     $ 16     $ 341  
                                         
Net book value                                        
At December 31, 2017   $ 153     $ 6     $ 52     $ 23     $ 234  
At December 31, 2018   $ 220     $ 27     $ 84     $ 13     $ 344  

 

7. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION

 

The Company’s exploration and evaluation projects consist of the Camino Rojo Project, the Cerro Quema Project, and the Monitor Gold Project.

 

(a) Camino Rojo Project

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Goldcorp Inc.’s (“Goldcorp”) Peñasquito Mine, and consists of eight concessions covering in aggregate 205,936 hectares. As currently understood, Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with exploration potential.

 

  Page 26  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

In November 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project, a gold and silver oxide heap leach project located in Zacatecas State, Mexico, from Goldcorp Inc. by:

 

· issuing 31,860,141 common shares of Orla,

· granting to Goldcorp a 2% net smelter royalty (the “Royalty”) on the sale of all metal production from Camino Rojo, and

· paying certain obligations, including Mexican value-added taxes, of approximately $4,923,000.

 

In addition, the Company and Goldcorp entered into an option agreement regarding the potential development of sulphide operations at Camino Rojo. Pursuant to the option agreement, Goldcorp will, subject to the applicable sulphide project meeting certain thresholds, have an option to acquire a 60% or 70% interest in the applicable sulphide project. The Royalty excludes revenue on the sale of metals produced from a sulphide project where Goldcorp has exercised its Sulphide Option.

 

We maintain a right of first refusal on the sale if Goldcorp elects to sell the Royalty, in whole or in part.

 

(b) Cerro Quema Project

 

The Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open-pit mine with process by heap leaching.

 

In December 2016, we acquired 100% of the Cerro Quema Project by acquiring Pershimco Resources Inc. through the issuance of a combination of Orla common shares and warrants, and the assumption of Pershimco’s long term debt, which we subsequently paid off. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the current mineral resource areas, proposed mine development areas, and priority drill target areas.

 

The original 20-year terms for these concessions expired in February and March of 2017. The Company has applied for the prescribed ten year extension to these concessions as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. In March 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications had been received and that exploration work could continue while the Company awaits renewal of the concessions. As of the date of these financial statements, final concession renewals have not been received; however, we continue to receive ongoing drilling, water use, environmental and other permits, and have paid concession taxes, in the normal course.

 

(c) Monitor Gold Project

 

The Monitor Gold Project consists of three separate option agreements consisting of 422 claims covering 3,416 hectares in Nye County, Nevada, USA.

 

On January 24, 2018, we entered into an option agreement with Mountain Gold Claims LLC to acquire up to a 100% interest in 392 claims covering approximately 3,173 hectares. These claims are subject to a 3% net smelter returns royalty on specified minerals produced from these claims. We have the right to acquire, at any time, the first third of the royalty for US$1,000,000 and a second third for US$4,000,000. The agreement grants a 1% net smelter returns royalty to Mountain Gold Claims LLC on any claims owned by third parties that are acquired by the Company within a defined Area of Interest around the claims acquired under this agreement. We have the right to acquire one half of this royalty for US$4,000,000.

 

Page 27

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

On March 21, 2018, we entered into an option agreement with King Solomon Gold LLC to acquire up to a 100% interest in 26 claims covering approximately 210 hectares. These claims are subject to a 2% net smelter returns royalty on specified minerals produced from these claims. We have the right to acquire, at any time, the first half of the royalty for US$1,000,000 and the second half for US$2,000,000.

 

On March 22, 2018, we entered into an option agreement with a subsidiary of Ely Gold Royalties Inc. to acquire up to a 100% interest in four claims covering approximately 32 hectares. These claims are subject to a 2.5% net smelter returns royalty on specified minerals produced from these claims. We have the right to acquire, at any time, 40% of the 2.5% royalty (ie, a 1% royalty, leaving a 1.5% royalty) for US$1,000,000.

 

To maintain the options, minimum payments and work commitments are required for each year to 2038. In 2019, these consist of US$50,000 in share issuances, a US$20,000 in advance royalty payments, and US$30,000 in work commitments. For 2020, these consist of US$40,000 in advance royalty payments, and US$75,000 in work commitments. Subsequent to the reporting period, we issued 58,895 common shares in respect of our option agreement with Mountain Gold Claims LLC.

 

(d) Exploration and evaluation assets

 

    Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Other     Total  
Acquisition costs at historical rates                                        
At January 1, 2017   $     $ 109,474     $     $ 261     $ 109,735  
Additions     54,258                         54,258  
Impairments                       (261 )     (261 )
At December 31, 2017     54,258       109,474                   163,732  
Additions                 407             407  
At December 31, 2018   $ 54,258     $ 109,474     $ 407     $     $ 164,139  
                                         
Accumulated foreign exchange on translation                                        
At January 1, 2017   $     $ 1,203     $     $     $ 1,203  
Due to changes in exchange rates     (2,470 )     (7,224 )                 (9,694 )
At December 31, 2017     (2,470 )     (6,021 )                 (8,491 )
Due to changes in exchange rates     4,615       8,997       22             13,634  
At December 31, 2018   $ 2,145     $ 2,976     $ 22     $     $ 5,143  
                                         
Acquisition costs                                        
At December 31, 2017   $ 51,788     $ 103,453     $     $     $ 155,241  
At December 31, 2018   $ 56,403     $ 112,450     $ 429     $     $ 169,282  

 

Page 28

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(e) Exploration and evaluation expense

 

Year ended December 31, 2018   Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 551     $ 877     $ 57     $     $ 1,485  
Drilling     1,525       1,482                   3,007  
Geological     1,289       2,079       407             3,775  
Engineering     364       144                   508  
Environmental     247       40                   287  
Community and government     192       710                   902  
Land, water use, and claims     4,875       5       99             4,979  
Project management     338       13                   351  
Project review                       141       141  
Site activities     1,472       1,914       92             3,478  
Site administration     741       2,434                   3,175  
Recognition of reclamation obligation     300       445                   745  
    $ 11,894     $ 10,143     $ 655     $ 141     $ 22,833  

 

Year ended December 31, 2017   Camino
Rojo
    Cerro
Quema
    Monitor
Gold
    Other     Total  
Assays and analysis   $ 7     $ 229     $     $     $ 236  
Drilling           1,858                   1,858  
Geological and geophysical     87       3,140                   3,227  
Community and government     7       1,240                   1,247  
Project management     28                         28  
Project review                       588       588  
Site activities     76       2,828                   2,904  
Site administration     20       1,896                   1,916  
    $ 225     $ 11,191     $     $ 588     $ 12,004  

 

Page 29

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

8. VALUE ADDED TAXES RECOVERABLE

 

Our Mexican entities pay value-added taxes (called “IVA” in Mexico) on certain goods and services we purchase. We also paid IVA in the equivalent of $4,923,000 on the initial acquisition of the Camino Rojo project, which is classified within exploration and evaluation assets as part of acquisition cost (note 7(a) and 7(d)).

 

As the Company has no history of recovering IVA, and consequently, timing of receipt is uncertain, we have presented IVA recoverable as long term.

 

    December 31,
2018
    December 31,
2017
 
IVA recoverable paid on purchases of goods and services   $ 823     $ 16  
Effect of movements in exchange rates     26        
    $ 849     $ 16  

 

9. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

 

    December 31,
2018
    December 31,
2017
 
Trade payables   $ 1,341     $ 598  
Payroll related liabilities     402       474  
Due to related parties (note 14)           387  
Accrued liabilities     1,916       798  
    $ 3,659     $ 2,257  

 

10. GOLDCORP LOAN

 

Pursuant to our agreement with Goldcorp for the acquisition of the Camino Rojo project (note 7(a)), Goldcorp agreed to pay for land holding costs as they are incurred on the Camino Rojo project, from November 7, 2017 until December 31, 2019. Such amounts received from Goldcorp are treated as tranches of an interest free loan. The loan is to be repaid upon the declaration of commencement of commercial production of a heap leach operation at Camino Rojo. At our option, we may repay any amounts owing to Goldcorp, earlier than that time, in the form of a lump sum cash payment, the issuance of common shares of the Company, or a combination of cash and shares, with the limitation that the total number of shares issued to Goldcorp to repay the loan may not result in Goldcorp holding more than 19.99% of the issued common shares of the Company.

 

Because the loan is non-interest bearing, for accounting purposes we estimated the fair value of the loan by discounting from the estimated maturity date of March 2021 using a risk-adjusted Mexican peso rate of 15%. The differences between the amount received and the loan obligations recognized are recorded as reductions of E&E expense.

 

We estimate the fair value of the Goldcorp loan at each reporting date, and recognize the change in profit or loss.

 

Page 30

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

    Year ended December 31, 2018  
    Mexican
peso
 (thousands)
    Mexican
pesos
(thousands)
    Canadian
dollars
(thousands)
 
    Undiscounted     Discounted        
Balance, begin of year               $  
Advances received     121,865       80,420       8,204  
Advances received in excess of fair value, credited to exploration expense                 (2,790 )
Change in fair value during the year           7,497       505  
Foreign exchange                 184  
At December 31, 2018     121,865       87,917     $ 6,103  

 

Comparative figures for 2017 are not presented as the loan was not outstanding during any periods in 2017.

 

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, the Company received a further MXN 51.3 million from Goldcorp pursuant this loan agreement.

 

11. SITE CLOSURE PROVISIONS

 

    Camino Rojo
Project
    Cerro Quema
Project
    Total  
At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017   $     $     $  
Increase to existing provisions     300       445       745  
At December 31, 2018   $ 300     $ 445     $ 745  

 

Site closure provisions represent the present value of rehabilitation costs of exploration properties, and decommissioning costs of mine sites and related plant and equipment. The closure provisions were estimated in US dollars, and the major estimates and assumptions we used in estimating these provisions include:

 

    Camino Rojo
Project
    Cerro Quema
Project
 
Estimated settlement dates     2029 to 2033       2030 to 2032  
Undiscounted risk-adjusted cash flows   $ 327     $ 491  
US dollar inflation rate     2.1 %     2.1 %
US dollar discount rate     3.0 %     3.0 %

 

12. SHARE CAPITAL

 

(a) Authorized share capital

 

The Company’s authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares without par value and an unlimited number of preferred shares without par value.

 

Page 31

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(b) Issued share capital

 

On January 17, 2018, the Company issued 147,702 common shares of the Company as settlement for $207,000 of accounts payable.

 

On February 15, 2018, the Company completed a brokered financing of 17,581,200 units at a price of $1.75 for gross proceeds of $30,767,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant may be exercised to purchase one additional common share at an exercise price of $2.35 at any time prior to February 15, 2021. The Company incurred issuance costs of $1,777,000. We estimated the grant date fair value of warrants issued with this financing (using a Black-Scholes option pricing model assuming a risk-free interest rate of 1.80%, an expected life of 3 years, an expected volatility of 50%, and an expected dividend yield of nil) at $2,964,000, and recorded this value in warrant reserve. The value attributed to the warrants was based on their relative fair value as compared to the fair value of the common shares. The remaining $27,803,000 was recorded as share capital.

 

During the year, we issued 487,500 common shares pursuant to the exercise of warrants for proceeds of $107,250. We issued 657,000 common shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options for proceeds of $136,000.

 

(c) Warrants

 

The following summarizes information about warrants outstanding at December 31, 2018:

 

Expiry date   Exercise
price
    December 31,
2017
    Issued     Exercised     Expired or
Cancelled
    December 31,
2018
 
February 15, 2018   $ 0.10       375,000             (375,000 )            
October 13, 2018   $ 1.75       865,668                   (865,668 )      
December 6, 2018   $ 2.00       5,825,160                   (5,825,160 )      
February 15, 2021   $ 2.35             8,790,600                   8,790,600  
July 8, 2021   $ 0.62       6,850,000             (112,500 )           6,737,500  
November 7, 2022   $ 1.40       3,000,000                         3,000,000  
Total number of warrants             16,915,828       8,790,600       (487,500 )     (6,690,828 )     18,528,100  
Weighted average exercise price           $ 1.28     $ 2.35     $ 0.22     $ 1.97     $ 1.57  

 

13. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

 

The Company has four different forms of share-based payments for eligible recipients – stock options, restricted share units (“RSUs”), deferred share units (“DSUs”), and bonus shares.

 

  Year ended December 31  
Share based payments expense   2018     2017  
Stock options (note 13(a))   $ 3,189     $ 3,580  
Restricted share units (note 13(b))     243        
Deferred share units (note 13(c))     227        
Bonus shares (note 13(d))     326       118  
 Share based payments expense   $ 3,985     $ 3,698  

 

Page 32

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(a) Stock options

 

The purpose of the Company’s rolling stock option plan is to better align the interests of the officers, directors, employees, and consultants with those of the Company’s shareholders by linking a portion of their compensation to the Company’s performance. It also enables the Company to attract, retain and motivate experienced and qualified individuals in those positions by providing them with the opportunity to acquire common shares of the Company through the exercise of stock options. Specific details of the plan are available in our annual proxy information circular, but in general, the terms of the plan are as follows:

 

· The plan is administered by a committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.

· The number of stock options, RSUs, and DSUs outstanding at any time cannot exceed 10% of the then-outstanding number of common shares.

· Grants with exercise price less than market are not permitted.

· Expiry date may not exceed ten years from the date of grant.

 

Stock options granted by the Company typically have a five-year life, with one third each vesting on grant date, and one year and two years after grant date.

 

    2018     2017  
Stock options outstanding   Number     Weighted
average
exercise price
    Number     Weighted
average
exercise price
 
Beginning of year     6,276,748     $ 1.13       2,618,744     $ 0.91  
Granted     3,841,505       1.26       4,365,000       1.39  
Exercised     (657,000 )     0.21       (374,500 )     0.72  
Expired or cancelled     (337,248 )     1.77       (332,496 )     3.30  
End of year     9,124,005     $ 1.23       6,276,748     $ 1.13  
                                 
Vested, end of year     5,426,005     $ 1.17       3,366,751     $ 0.90  

 

The grant date fair value of options granted during 2018 and 2017 were determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

    2018     2017  
Number granted     3,841,505       4,365,000  
Grant date fair value   $ 2,202     $ 6,013  
Assumptions used:                
Expected volatility     50 %     233 %
Expected life     5 years       5 years  
Canadian dollar risk free interest rate     2.1 %     1.1 %
Dividends     nil       nil  

 

Page 33

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

The stock options outstanding at December 31, 2018, were as follows:

 

Expiry date   Exercise
price
    Remaining
life (years)
    Number     Number
vested
 
October 1, 2019   $ 1.48       0.8       66,500       66,500  
December 31, 2019     0.15       1.0       225,000       225,000  
December 31, 2019     1.25       1.0       176,991       176,991  
December 31, 2019     1.39       1.0       600,000       600,000  
November 27, 2020     0.15       1.9       550,000       550,000  
December 3, 2020     0.81       1.9       76,000       76,000  
June 23, 2022     1.39       3.5       3,765,000       2,510,003  
May 31, 2023     1.25       4.4       1,050,000       350,000  
June 27, 2023     1.25       4.5       1,464,514       488,177  
September 10, 2023     1.25       4.7       150,000       50,000  
November 23, 2023     1.30       4.9       1,000,000       333,334  
Total number of stock options                     9,124,005       5,426,005  

 

(b) Restricted Share Units

 

On June 27, 2018, the Board approved a Restricted Share Unit (“RSU”) Plan. RSU’s are awarded to key employees. The purpose of the RSU Plan is to help retain key employees by permitting them to participate in the growth and development of the Company by awarding them common shares of the Company after completion of a specified service period. The acquisition of shares in the Company under the RSU Plan will better align their interests with the long-term interests of the shareholders of the Company. Specific details of the plan are available in our annual proxy information circular, but in general, the terms of the plan are as follows:

 

· The Board of Directors sets the terms of incentive awards under the RSU Plan.

· The maximum number of common shares available for issuance under the RSU Plan is 3,000,000.

· The Company has the sole discretion whether to settle vested RSUs by issuing common shares or cash.

 

RSUs awarded by the Company typically vest one-third each one, two, and three years after award date.

 

        Number vesting in the year  
RSUs outstanding:   Number     2018     2019     2020     2021  
Outstanding, January 1, 2018                              
Awarded     368,000       120,000       82,666       82,667       82,667  
Vested     (120,000 )     (120,000 )                  
Vested but not yet settled at reporting date     120,000       120,000                    
Outstanding, December 31, 2018     368,000       120,000       82,666       82,667       82,667  

 

On January 15, 2019, subsequent to the reporting period, we issued 120,000 common shares in settlement of 120,000 RSU’s which had vested on December 31, 2018.

 

Comparative information for 2017 is not presented as there were no RSUs outstanding at any time in 2017.

 

Page 34

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(c) Deferred Share Units

 

On June 27, 2018, the Board approved a Deferred Share Unit (“DSU”) Plan. DSU’s are awarded to directors of the Company. The purpose of the DSU Plan is to strengthen the alignment of interests between directors and shareholders by linking a portion of annual director compensation to the future value of the Company’s common shares, in lieu of cash compensation.

 

· The Board of Directors sets the terms of incentive awards under the DSU Plan.

· DSU awards vest immediately upon award. However, DSUs can only be redeemed when the DSU holder ceases to be a director of the Company.

· The maximum number of common shares available for issuance under the DSU Plan is 2,000,000.

· The Company has the sole discretion whether to settle vested DSUs by issuing common shares or cash.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company granted 180,000 DSUs to directors. As at December 31, 2018, all 180,000 of these DSUs had vested but none had been redeemed.

 

(d) Bonus shares

 

During 2017, the Board of Directors awarded 500,000 common shares to the non-executive Chairman of the Company as bonus shares. The bonus shares are subject to a vesting period from June 19, 2017 to June 18, 2020 (the “Eligibility Period”). If the non-executive Chairman ceases to be the director of the Company before the Eligibility Period ends, the bonus shares will be forfeited. The bonus shares will become issuable (1) after the Eligibility Period on the date that the non-executive Chairman ceases to act as a director of the Company, or (2) upon a change of control of the Company.

 

We estimated the fair value of the bonus shares ($1.31 each) based on the market price of the common shares at the date of Board approval. Accordingly, the amount of $655,000 is being recognized on a straight line basis over the Eligibility Period.

 

On November 13, 2018, the Board of Directors awarded 1,000,000 bonus shares to an officer of the Company. The bonus shares vest in four tranches of 250,000 bonus shares each, issuable upon the achievement of certain share price thresholds particular to each tranche. We have estimated that these market condition tranches will vest in various periods from December 2019 to March 2022, and consequently, the award date fair value ($537,000, or $0.537 per bonus share) is being recognized over these periods.

 

Page 35

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company’s related parties include:

 

Related party Nature of the relationship
Key management personnel Key management personnel are the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and members of the Board of Directors of the Company.
   
Pref-Ex Geological Inc. (“Pref-Ex”)

Private company controlled by Marc Prefontaine, the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Prior to 2018, the Company did not employ Mr. Prefontaine directly, and his services as Chief Executive Officer were provided pursuant to a management agreement with Pref-Ex. Effective January 1, 2018, he became an employee of the Company, and the agreement with Pref-Ex expired.

Pref-Ex Geological Inc. ceased to be a related party on December 31, 2018.

   
Hans Smit, P. Geo. Inc. (“HSPGI”)

Private company controlled by Hans Smit, the Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

Prior to 2018, the Company did not employ Mr. Smit directly, and his services as Chief Operating Officer were provided pursuant to a management agreement with HSPGI. Effective January 1, 2018, he became an employee of the Company, and the agreement with HSPGI expired.

   
Quantum Advisory Partners LLP (“Quantum”)

Registered limited liability partnership, of which Paul Robertson, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is an incorporated partner.

The Company did not employ Mr. Robertson directly, and his services as Chief Financial Officer were provided pursuant to a professional services agreement with Quantum.

Besides providing the services of Mr. Robertson, Quantum provided bookkeeping and accounting services to the Company at agreed monthly quantities and rates, with additional charges for excess usage. Pricing is at normal commercial terms, with prices negotiated annually.

Quantum ceased to be a related party on April 30, 2018.

   
Alain Bureau Project Management Inc. (“ABPMI”) Private company controlled by Alain Bureau, a former director of the Company.  ABPMI ceased to be a related party on June 19, 2017.

 

Page 36

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

(a) Key Management Personnel

 

Compensation to key management personnel was as follows:

 

    Year ended December 31  
    2018     2017  
Short term incentive plans                
      Salaries, management services, and consulting fees   $ 1,106     $ 1,151  
      Directors’ fees     169       85  
      1,275       1,236  
Termination benefits     550        
Share based payments     3,132       2,825  
Total   $ 4,957     $ 4,061  

 

We did not include in the above totals for 2018 an amount of $75,000 paid to Quantum for short term incentive compensation to Mr. Robertson because this amount was declared and paid subsequent to Quantum ceasing to be a related party; however, this amount is in respect of services rendered while Quantum was a related party.

 

The Company is committed to making severance payments amounting to approximately $3,225,000 (December 31, 2017 – $1,144,000) to certain officers and management in the event of a change in control. As the likelihood of these events taking place is not determinable, such amounts have not been reflected in these consolidated financial statements.

 

(b) Transactions

 

The following related party transactions are included in compensation to key management personnel, above.

 

    Year ended December 31  
    2018     2017  
Pref-Ex Geological Inc. – management services   $     $ 250  
Hans Smit, P. Geo. Inc – management services           250  
Quantum Advisory Partners LLP – management services     71       173  
Alain Bureau Project Management Inc. – management services           100  

 

The Company had no other material transactions with related parties other than key management personnel during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

(c) Outstanding balances at the Reporting Date

 

At December 31, 2018, estimated accrued short term incentive compensation totaled $324,000 and was included in accrued liabilities (December 31, 2017 – $387,420). Such amounts are not payable until actually determined by the Board to be paid.

 

Page 37

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

15. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

The non-cash investing and financing activities of the Company include the following:

 

    Year ended December 31  
    2018     2017  
Shares issued for acquisition   $     $ 44,604  
Shares issued for debt settlement     207        
Warrants issued for transaction costs           4,138  
Reclassification from reserves to share capital upon exercise of options     113       291  
Reclassification from reserves to share capital upon exercise of warrants     52       354  

 

16. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

(a) Reportable segments

 

The operating segments of the Company are based on the reports which are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in making strategic resource allocation decisions. These operating segments are the Panamanian projects, the Mexican projects, and the corporate office. The projects are each managed by a dedicated General Manager and management team. Additionally, the corporate office oversees the plans and activities of early stage exploration projects, such as the Monitor Gold project.

 

None of these segments as yet generate revenue from external customers, and each of the projects are focused on the exploration and evaluation of mineral properties.

 

(b) Geographic segments

 

We conduct our activities in four geographic areas: Mexico, Panama, the United States, and Canada.

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At December 31, 2018                                        
   Restricted cash   $     $ 205     $     $     $ 205  
   Equipment     193       117             34       344  
   Exploration and evaluation assets     56,403       112,450       429             169,282  
                                         
Year ended December 31, 2018                                        
   Exploration expense   $ 11,894     $ 10,143     $ 655     $ 141     $ 22,833  

 

Page 38

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

 

    Mexico     Panama     USA     Canada     Total  
At December 31, 2017                                        
   Restricted cash   $     $ 188     $     $     $ 188  
   Equipment     6       218             10       234  
   Exploration and evaluation assets     51,788       103,453                   155,241  
                                         
Year ended December 31, 2017                                        
   Exploration expense   $ 225     $ 11,191     $     $ 588     $ 12,004  

 

17. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

 

Our objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the exploration and evaluation of our mineral properties and to maintain a flexible capital structure. In the management of capital, we include long term loans and share capital.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we included long term loans in our policy for capital management, as they did not exist in prior years. Other than that inclusion, there were no changes to our policy for capital management during the year.

 

We manage our capital structure and make adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the Company’s capital structure, we may issue new shares, acquire or dispose of assets, or adjust the amount of cash and short-term investments. In order to maximize ongoing development efforts, we do not currently pay dividends. The Company and its subsidiaries are not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.

 

Loan advances from Goldcorp are used within a few weeks of receipt to pay land holding costs pursuant to the loan agreement governing these advances.

 

Our investment policy is to invest the Company’s excess cash in low risk financial instruments such as term deposits and higher yield savings accounts with major Canadian banks. By using this strategy, the Company preserves its cash resources and is able to marginally increase these resources through the yields on these investments. Our financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks, which include currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk.

 

Our ability to carry out our long range strategic objectives in future years depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing exploration and development activities.

 

Page 39

  

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

18. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

(a) Fair value hierarchy

 

To provide an indication of the reliability of the inputs used in determining fair value, we classify our financial instruments into the three levels prescribed by the accounting standards.

 

  Level 1 The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded equity securities) is based on quoted (unadjusted) market prices as at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Company is the closing trading price on the reporting date. Such instruments are included in Level 1.

 

  Level 2 The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, we include that instrument in Level 2.

 

  Level 3 If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in Level 3. We have no financial assets or liabilities included in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

 

At December 31, 2018, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying value     Quoted prices in active market for identical assets
(Level 1)
    Significant other observable inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                            
Cash   FVTPL   $ 16,686     $ 16,686     $     $     $ 16,686  
Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     385             385             385  
Reclamation deposits   Amortized cost     205             205             205  
        $ 17,276       16,686     $ 590     $     $ 17,276  
                                             
Financial liabilities                                            
Trade payables   Amortized cost   $ 1,341     $     $ 1,341     $     $ 1,341  
Goldcorp loan   FVTPL     6,103             6,103             6,103  
        $ 7,444     $     $ 7,444     $     $ 7,444  

   

  Page 40  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

At December 31, 2017, the carrying values and fair values of our financial instruments by category were as follows:

 

              Fair value  
    Classification   Carrying value     Quoted prices in active market for identical assets
(Level 1)
    Significant other observable inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
    Fair value  
Financial assets                                            
Cash   FVTPL   $ 6,142     $ 6,142     $     $     $ 6,142  
Accounts receivable   Amortized cost     149             149             149  
        $ 6,291     $ 6,142     $ 149     $     $ 6,291  
                                             
Financial liabilities                                            
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   Amortized cost   $ 2,257     $     $ 2,257     $     $ 2,257  

 

 Our policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as at the end of the reporting period. As at December 31, 2018, we had no financial assets or financial liabilities which we measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

 

  (b) Financial Risk Management

 

  (i) Credit risk

 

Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to financial instruments fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company’s exposure to credit risk is limited to cash and reclamation deposits.

 

Our cash is held at large Canadian financial institutions in interest bearing accounts. Our reclamation deposits are held with large banks in the countries where they have been lodged. We believe that the credit risk related to our cash and reclamation deposits is negligible.

 

The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk is the carrying value of cash and reclamation deposits.

 

  (ii) Liquidity risk

 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with its financial liabilities.

  

  Page 41  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

At December 31, 2018, our financial liabilities had expected maturity dates as follows:

 

    Fair value     Less than
3 months
    Between
3 months and
1 year
    Between
1 year and
3 years
    More than
3 years
 
Financial liabilities                                        
Trade payables   $ 1,341     $ 1,341     $     $     $  
Goldcorp loan     6,103                         8,204  
    $ 7,444     $ 1,341     $     $     $ 8,204  

  

We manage liquidity by anticipating and maintaining adequate cash balances to meet liabilities as they become due. We review cash forecasts on a regular basis to determine whether the Company will have sufficient cash to meet future working capital needs.

 

  (iii) Market risk

 

Market risk is the risk that the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments will fluctuate due to changes in market prices. The significant market risks to which the Company’s financial instruments are exposed are currency risk and interest rate risk.

 

  (A) Currency risk

 

The Company is exposed to currency risk to the extent that monetary assets and liabilities held by the Company are not denominated in Canadian dollars. We have not entered into any foreign currency contracts or similar arrangements to mitigate this risk.

 

Our financial instruments are held in Canadian dollars (“CAD”), US dollars (“USD”), and Mexican pesos (“MXN”). As such, our US- and Mexican-currency accounts and balances are subject to fluctuation against the Canadian dollar. Our financial instruments were denominated in the following currencies as at December 31, 2018:

 

    Canadian dollars
(thousands)
    US dollars
(thousands)
    Mexican pesos
(thousands)
 
Cash   $ 15,216     $ 281     $ 15,658  
Accounts receivable     26       254       196  
Reclamation deposits           150        
Trade payables     (333 )     (128 )     (12,003 )
Goldcorp loan                 (87,917 )
Total foreign currency     14,908       557       (84,066 )
Exchange rate     1.0000       1.3642       0.0694  
Equivalent Canadian dollars   $ 14,908     $ 759     $ (5,836 )

  

 Based on the above net exposures as at December 31, 2018, and assuming that all other variables remain constant:

 

  · a 10% appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would decrease loss by $75,000 and

 

  · a 10% appreciation of the Mexican peso against the Canadian dollar would increase loss by $584,000.

 

  Page 42  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

  (B) Interest rate risk

 

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. Our cash and our reclamation deposits are held mainly in saving accounts and term deposits and therefore there is currently minimal interest rate risk. Because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments, fluctuations in market rates do not have a significant impact on estimated fair values compared to carrying value.

 

The Company’s interest rate risk arises principally from the changes in interest rates related to term deposits where our cash and reclamation deposits are held. A one percent change in interest rates would result in a change of approximately $207,000 to the Company’s loss for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

The fair value of the Goldcorp loan is subject to interest rate risk as it is marked to market at each reporting date. The fair value would have increased by $137,000 had interest rates been 1% lower.

 

  19. INCOME TAXES

 

  (a) Tax amounts recognized in profit or loss

 

      2018       2017  
Current tax expense   $     $  
Deferred tax expense            
Tax expense   $     $  

 

 

  (b) Reconciliation of effective tax rate

 

Income tax expense differs from the amount that would be computed by applying the applicable Canadian statutory income tax rate to income before income taxes. The significant reasons for the differences are as follows:

 

    2018     2017  
Income (loss) before tax   $ (29,913 )   $ (18,700 )
Statutory income tax rate     27.0 %     26.0 %
                 
Expected income tax   $ (8,077 )   $ (4,862 )
Differences between Canadian and foreign tax rates     (174 )     28  
Items not deductible for tax purposes     226       242  
Share based compensation     1,076       961  
Change in unrecognized deductible temporary differences     6,954       3,631  
Other     (5 )      
Total income taxes            
                 
Effective tax rate     n/a       n/a  

  

 In 2018, the statutory income tax rate applicable to the Canadian parent entity increased to 27% (2017 – 26%).

 

  Page 43  

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

(Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. All currency figures in tables are in thousands, except per-share amounts)

 

  (c) Unrecognized deductible temporary differences

 

We recognize tax benefits on losses or other deductible amounts generated in countries where the probable criteria for the recognition of deferred tax assets has been met. The Company’s unrecognized deductible temporary differences for which no deferred tax asset is recognized consist of the following amounts.

 

    December 31  
    2018     2017  
Mineral properties and exploration expenditures   $ 42,972     $ 9,044  
Equipment     2,339       2,044  
Site closure provisions     745        
Share issue costs     2,921       1,097  
Non capital losses     37,099       31,192  
Unrecognized deductible temporary differences   $ 86,076     $ 43,377  

 

 

  (d) Tax loss carryforwards

 

Our tax losses have the following expiry dates.

 

    Tax losses   December 31  
    expire in years   2018     2017  
Canada   2026 to 2038   $ 33,329     $ 28,442  
Mexico   2021 to 2028     227       103  
Panama   2019 to 2023     2,782       2,647  
United States   2038     761        

 

 

  20. EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

 

Subsequent to December 31, 2018:

 

  · On January 17, 2018, the Company received a further MXN 51.3 million from Goldcorp pursuant the loan agreement (note 10).  
  · On January 10, 2019, the Company issued 120,000 common shares upon the vesting of 120,000 RSU’s (note 13(b)).
  · On January 28, 2019, the Company issued 58,895 common shares pursuant to an option agreement for the Monitor Gold Project (note 7(c)).
  · On March 11, 2019, the Company filed a final short form base shelf prospectus, which will enable the Company to make offerings of up to $300 million in securities over 25 months.

 

  Page 44  

 

Exhibit 99.85

 

 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

 

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

1. Overview

 

Orla Mining Ltd. is a mineral exploration and development company which, effective November 1, 2018, trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol OLA. Prior to November 1, 2018, it traded on the TSX Venture Exchange under the same ticker symbol. The “Company”, “Orla”, “we”, and “our” refer to Orla Mining Ltd. and its subsidiaries. Refer to page 24 of this document for a list of abbreviations used.

 

Our corporate strategy is to acquire and develop mineral exploration properties where our expertise can substantially increase shareholder value. We have two material gold projects with near-term production potential based on open pit mining and heap leaching – the Camino Rojo gold and silver project in Zacatecas State, Mexico, and the Cerro Quema gold project in Panama.

 

You should read this Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “financial statements”), which were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). You can find additional information regarding the Company, including our Annual Information Form, on SEDAR under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com.

 

All monetary amounts herein are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.

 

This MD&A is current as of March 18, 2019.

 

Hans Smit, P. Geo, our Chief Operating Officer, is the Qualified Person, as the term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). He has reviewed and approved the technical information disclosed in this MD&A.

 

With respect to the preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) on the Camino Rojo project, readers are cautioned that PEAs are preliminary in nature and include the use of inferred mineral resources, which are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is no certainty that preliminary economic assessment results will be realized. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

 

2. Highlights

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018 and to the date of this MD&A, the Company:

 

· completed and filed a Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) Technical Report in respect of the Camino Rojo Project,

· reported additional drill intercepts from the Caballito Copper-Gold Zone at the Cerro Quema Project,

· reported positive metallurgical test results on oxide material from the Cerro Quema Project,

· appointed a new Chief Financial Officer, a new Corporate Secretary, a new President and Chief Executive Officer,

· commenced trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange,

· entered into option agreements to acquire the Monitor Gold project in Nevada, and

· filed a final short form base shelf prospectus for offerings of up to $300 million.

 

Page 2

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

3. Discussion of Operations

 

A. Camino Rojo, Mexico

 

Project Description and History

 

The Camino Rojo Project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Goldcorp Inc.’s (“Goldcorp”) Peñasquito Mine and consists of eight concessions covering in aggregate 205,936 hectares. On November 7, 2017, we acquired the Camino Rojo Project from Goldcorp. As currently understood, Camino Rojo is comprised of a near-surface oxide gold and silver deposit, a deeper sulphide zone containing gold, silver, zinc and lead mineralization, and a large area with exploration potential.

 

Canplats Resources Corporation (“Canplats”) initially discovered gold-silver mineralization at Camino Rojo in 2007, and they subsequently completed 39,725 metres of drilling, largely delineating the shallow oxide mineralization. Canplats also carried out metallurgical studies prior to being acquired by Goldcorp in 2010. Goldcorp then completed more than 250,000 metres of drilling, conducted airborne and ground geophysical surveys, did extensive geological and mineralogical investigations, and conducted numerous metallurgical studies, which included detailed mineralogical studies, column leach tests on oxide material, size fraction analysis, variability test work and sulphide flotation studies.

 

The Ejido San Tiburcio holds the surface rights over the main area of known mineralization. Exploration has been carried out under the authority of agreements between the project operators and the Ejido San Tiburcio. There is a temporary occupation agreement in place with the Ejido San Tiburcio, with the right to expropriate, covering all the area of the mineral resource and area of potential development described in the Camino Rojo Report. The Company has water rights in the project area.

 

The Company has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property. However, if sulphide projects are defined through one or more positive pre-feasibility studies with certain development scenarios meeting certain criteria, Goldcorp has an option to enter into a joint venture with Orla for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of such a sulphide project. If Goldcorp exercises its option, Orla’s share of the costs to develop the project might be carried to production by Goldcorp. Orla has a right of first refusal on a sale if Goldcorp elects to sell its portion of the sulphide project, in whole or in part. The Camino Rojo Asset Purchase Agreement was filed on SEDAR on June 28, 2017. Details of the development scenarios and joint venture structures are available in our news release dated November 7, 2017, which is available here.

 

2018 Activities and Future Plans

 

Immediately upon acquiring the Camino Rojo project in November 2017, the Company started refurbishing the camp, and also commenced a Community and Social Responsibility program. We relogged a portion of the core holes by the end of 2017 as part of creating a new geological model for the property, which formed the basis for the mineral resource estimate completed in April 2018.

 

Starting in early 2018, we conducted exploration work to evaluate previously identified targets and to develop new targets for gold and silver mineralization on our large land position. In March 2018, we started environmental baseline and assessment activities required for permitting, as well as the evaluation of flow rates from four previously established water wells.

 

Page 3

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

In May 2018, we announced a Mineral Resource estimate for the Camino Rojo deposit and the results of a PEA for the development of an open pit project with heap leaching process to recover the gold and silver mineralization, both prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

 

Summary of the Mineral Resource at Camino Rojo:

 

M&I Resource   K tonnes     Au (g/t)     Ag (g/t)     Au (Koz)     Ag (Koz)  
Leach – Oxide/Trans     100,839       0.734       12.67       2,381       41,091  
Mill – Sulphide     254,069       0.889       7.50       7,265       61,286  
Total M&I     354,908       0.845       8.97       9,646       102,377  
Total Inferred     65,200       0.867       7.73       1,817       16,208  

 

M&I Resource   K tonnes     Lead (%)     Zinc (%)     Lead (Mlbs)     Zinc (Mlbs)  
Leach – Oxide/Trans     100,389       0.21       0.37       455.8       814.8  
Mill – Sulphide     254,069       0.07       0.26       402       1,458.3  
Total M&I     354,908       0.11       0.29       875.8       2,273.2  
Total Inferred     65,200       0.05       0.23       75.2       336.8  

 

Notes:

 

(1) The mineral resource is effective as of April 27, 2018.

(2) Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding.

(3) Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

(4) Mineral resources for leach material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold and $20/oz silver.

(5) Mineral resources for mill material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold, $20/oz silver, $1.05/lb lead, and $1.25/lb zinc.

(6) Mineral resources are based on NSR cut-off grades of $5.06/t for leach material and $13.72/t for mill material.

(7) The mineral resource estimate assumes that the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto land held by the owner of the adjacent property. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the owner of the adjacent property.

 

Page 4

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

On July 12, 2018, we filed the preliminary economic assessment of the Camino Rojo Project. The PEA was based on near-surface oxide and partly oxidized (transitional) material within the overall mineral resource that can be processed by heap leaching. All mineral resources and the proposed open pit are within our mineral concessions.

 

Highlights of the PEA were as follows:

 

Production rate   18,000 tonnes
Life of mine   6.6 years
Total material to the leach pad   42.5 million tonnes
Average grade – gold and silver   0.71 g/t gold, and 13.56 g/t silver
Contained ounces   966,000 oz gold, and 18,517,000 oz silver
Average recovery   67% gold, and 15% silver
Average annual gold production   97,500 ounces
Strip ratio   0.58
Initial capex   US$125 million
Average life of mine production costs   US$8.02 per tonne processed
Total By-Product Cash Cost1   US$499/oz Au
All-In Sustaining Cost1   US$555/oz Au
Pre-tax Net Present Value (“NPV”) (using 5% discount rate)   US$231 million
Pre-tax Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”)   38.1%
After-tax NPV (using 5% discount rate)   US$121 million
After-tax IRR   24.5%
Payback period   3.3 years
Metal price assumptions   US$1,250/oz gold and US$17/oz silver

 

Further details can be found in the 43-101 Technical Report filed on SEDAR on July 12, 2018, which is also available here.

 

Key opportunities for the Camino Rojo project include:

 

· If an agreement can be reached with the owner of the adjoining claim, there would be an increase in the amount of material that could potentially be mined and processed.

 

· Steepening of the north wall of the proposed pit would result in an increase in material that could potentially be mined and processed.

 

Risks for the Camino Rojo project include:

 

· Predicted metallurgical results in the Camino Rojo PEA are based on significant historical test work. However, there is very limited direct test work on coarse crushed material considered in the PEA. Due to the lack of confirmatory test work, there is a risk that the recovery estimates may be somewhat overstated. Confirmatory test work is currently being undertaken.

 

· Carbonaceous material with preg-robbing characteristics has been identified, which may reduce overall heap performance and metal recovery if processed in the latter part of the project.

 

· Additional studies on the proposed power line to site, including approval from the Mexican CFE, are required to confirm the proposed power line is feasible. Based on the results of these studies, an alternative power supply method may be required for part or all of the project, which may increase project costs.

 

 

 

1 Includes royalties payable

 

Page 5

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Following the completion of the PEA, we commenced feasibility work during the second half of 2018. We anticipate completion of this work in mid-2019. We completed a 14-hole diamond drill program to acquire material for additional column-leach metallurgical testing adding to the 88 column tests completed by previous owners. Column-leach tests conducted to determine optimum crush size and for feasibility level gold and silver recovery estimates are now complete and final column recoveries are being determined.

 

We drilled 13 reverse-circulation holes in areas where the Company has surface rights to explore for groundwater in the second half of 2018. The best results were in a hole that intersected limestone approximately 5 km north of the proposed development. We are currently constructing a well at this location.

 

Excavator trenching and shallow drilling to support geotechnical studies under the proposed infrastructure was undertaken in mid to late 2018. No significant issues were detected. Three core holes were drilled for geotechnical analysis of the north wall of the proposed pit. This analysis is still underway.

 

Exploration work to evaluate previously identified targets and develop new targets for gold and silver mineralization on our 205,936 ha land position started in early 2018. As mineralization previously discovered on the property demonstrates, shallow cover can mask extensive near-surface mineralization. We completed a 100 line-km Induced Polarization (“IP”) survey with 400 metre spaced lines in the spring of 2018 over the known deposit, areas of potential development, and an adjoining area to the west. Results showed a low but distinctive chargeability anomaly at depth in the area of the current deposit. A similar anomaly at depth to the west of the resource will be tested by drilling in 2019.

 

A new IP survey to the southeast of the resource and proposed development area was started in January 2019. This 120 line-km survey will test the projection of the San Tiburcio fault, a structure considered important to the emplacement of the known mineralization.

 

Environmental assessment required for permitting is ongoing with a planned completion in June 2019.

 

B. Cerro Quema Project, Panama

 

Project Description and History

 

Our 100%-owned Cerro Quema Project is located on the Azuero Peninsula in Los Santos Province, in south western Panama, about 45 kilometres southwest of the city of Chitre and about 190 kilometres southwest of Panama City. The project is at the exploration and development stage for a proposed open-pit mine with process by heap leaching. We own the mineral rights as well as the surface rights over the areas of the current mineral resources and mineral reserves, proposed mine development and the priority drill targets.

 

Mineral concessions are comprised of three contracts between the Republic of Panama and Minera Cerro Quema S.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of Orla. The original 20-year term for these concessions expired on February 26, 2017 (Contracts 19 and 20) and March 3, 2017 (Contract 21). The Company has applied for the prescribed 10-year extension to these contracts as it is entitled to under Panamanian mineral law. On March 6, 2017, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry provided written confirmation to the Company that the extension applications were received, and that exploration work could continue while the Company waits for the renewal. We have received verbal assurances from government officials that the renewal applications are complete with no outstanding legal issues. On April 26, 2017, the Company received authorization from the Ministry of Environment to drill in two areas outside of the existing permitted drill area. On June 28, 2017, the Company received a permit to use water for drilling. A permit was received on May 8, 2018 to drill in the Sombrero zone and on May 11, 2018, we received two permits to use water for drilling. An existing permit that allows drilling in the areas of the current mineral resources was extended for two years in May 2018. In October 2018, the government accepted our 2018 concession tax payments, and in February 2019, we paid the 2019 concession tax payments. A new drilling permit for the Pelona area in the eastern part of the concessions was received very recently on February 11, 2019.

 

Page 6

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Company owns the surface rights for land required to mine the Cerro Quema mineral reserves and to construct and operate a heap leach facility, and part of the land required for proposed upgrades to the project access road.

 

A predecessor company to Orla issued a mineral resource estimate and a Pre-Feasibility Study for Cerro Quema, and an independent technical report entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”).

 

The Cerro Quema Report envisions a standard open pit mine with two pits, one at La Pava and one at Quemita, coupled with a 10,000 tonne per day heap leach facility to extract the gold. With an average head grade of 0.77 g/t Au and a crush size of 80% passing minus 50mm, an average gold recovery of 86% was estimated. This would result in 418,000 ounces of gold production over a 5.3-year mine life.

 

The Cerro Quema Report, which contains the 2014 mineral resource and mineral reserve estimate and Pre-Feasibility Study, was filed on SEDAR by Pershimco Resources Inc. on August 22, 2014. You can download it from SEDAR here.

 

Cerro Quema Mineral Reserves

 

Zone   Category   Cut-Off
(Au g/t)
    Tonnes (millions)     Au
(g/t)
    Au
(koz)
 
La Pava   Proven     0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
    Probable     0.21       7.40       0.67       159  
    Sub-Total     0.21       14.22       0.73       335  
Quema   Proven     0.21                    
  Probable     0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
  Sub-Total     0.21       5.49       0.86       153  
Total   Proven     0.21       6.82       0.80       176  
  Probable     0.21       12.89       0.75       312  
  Total     0.21       19.71       0.77       488  

 

Notes:

(1) Numbers may not add due to rounding.

(2) A cut-off grade of 0.21 g/t of gold is used for reporting mineral reserves.

(3) Mineral reserves are estimated at a gold price of US$1,300 per ounce.

(4) Effective as of June 30, 2014.

(5) See NI 43-101 Technical Report “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” published on August 15, 2014 for additional information. A copy of the report is available on the Company’s website and under the SEDAR profile of Pershimco Resources Inc. at www.sedar.com.

 

2018 Exploration and Development Activities, and Future Plans

 

During 2018, we conducted drilling at Cerro Quema with one rig in operation. The Company drilled 7,536 metres in 27 holes during 2018. This work focused on the Caballito copper-gold discovery, and the Sombrero zone which is adjacent to the north of Caballito.

 

The Caballito zone is defined by a 650 to 800-metre-long northwest-southeast trending chargeability anomaly outlined by a 2017 IP survey. It is 350 to 400 metres wide. Highest grade mineralization occurs on the southwest side of the zone and is associated with very low resistivity within the overall chargeability due to very high sulphide content. Widths in excess of 100 metres grading better than 1% copper and associated 0.2 to 0.4 grams per tonne gold have been reported.

 

Page 7

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

In 2018, we re-examined core from sulphide intercepts below the Quemita oxide gold mineral reserve located 1.2 km to the northwest of Caballito and found indications of Caballito style copper-gold mineralization with low arsenic. Therefore we extended the IP grid northward from the area surveyed in 2017 through this area and completed 25 line-km of new surveying in 2018. Results from the new IP indicated areas with potential for similar mineralization as found at Caballito. Six holes drilled north of Caballito in Sombrero intersected variable zones of alteration, but no high-grade mineralization. Further drilling is planned.

 

We completed column testing on material at larger sizes than previously tested. Gold recoveries on material crushed to 150 millimetres were 96% for the La Pava deposit, which contains approximately two thirds of the current mineral reserves, and 91% for the Quemita deposit. Operational recovery estimates are typically de-rated from column test data, but these results compare very favorably to an average operational recovery of 86% in the 2014 Pre-Feasibility Study at a crush size of -70 millimetres. We will incorporate the results into an updated process plan and operational recovery estimates that will consider one-stage crushing or run of mine instead of the two-stage crushing modelled in the 2014 PFS.

 

The Company has an ongoing environmental management plan that includes installing and maintaining sediment dams, reforestation of previously disturbed areas and active sediment control activities. Baseline surface water quality sampling and groundwater level measurements are also ongoing.

 

The Company has an active community relations program that includes providing hot lunches to 5 to 15-year-old children studying in the 12 schools located within a 15 kilometre radius of the Project. We also provide support for various local amateur sports teams, a youth orchestra, local fairs, and cultural events.

 

Future Plans

 

The metallurgical test work conducted during 2018 is part of the Company's effort to update the 2014 PFS. We expect to complete the update of the 2014 PFS, including new mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates, in the first half of 2020. In addition to the work on oxide mineralization, we will continue to advance exploration of the Caballito copper-gold sulphide discovery. This style of mineralization, identified late last year, presents potential value to the project in addition to the current heap-leach oxide gold project. In addition to the 1.2 km long trend north of Caballito through to Quemita, the Pelona area in the eastern part of the project provides extensive target area for additional Caballito-style mineralization.

 

C.            Monitor Gold Project, Nevada

 

Option Agreements

 

The Monitor Gold Project is a grassroots project in an area where work by past operators showed extensive areas with samples anomalous in gold and other metals associated with alteration, including silicification, within carbonate rocks. Stratigraphic assemblages known to host mineral deposits elsewhere in Nevada are found in the area and there are a number of major structures which could provide conduits for mineralizing fluids. Work in 2018 included mapping, rock and soil sampling and a small gravity survey.

 

On January 24, 2018, we entered into an option agreement with Mountain Gold Claims LLC to acquire up to a 100% interest in 392 claims covering approximately 3,173 hectares. These claims are subject to a 3% net smelter returns royalty on specified minerals produced from these claims. We have the right to acquire, at any time, the first third of the royalty for US$1,000,000 and a second third for US$4,000,000. The agreement grants a 1% net smelter returns royalty to Mountain Gold Claims LLC on any claims owned by third parties that are acquired by the Company within a defined Area of Interest around the claims acquired under this agreement. We have the right to acquire one half of this royalty for US$4,000,000.

 

On March 21, 2018, we entered into an option agreement with King Solomon Gold LLC to acquire up to a 100% interest in 26 claims covering approximately 210 hectares. These claims are subject to a 2% net smelter returns royalty on specified minerals produced from these claims. We have the right to acquire, at any time, the first half of the royalty for US$1,000,000 and the second half for US$2,000,000.

 

Page 8

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

On March 22, 2018, we entered into an option agreement with a subsidiary of Ely Gold Royalties Inc. to acquire up to a 100% interest in four claims covering approximately 32 hectares. These claims are subject to a 2.5% net smelter returns royalty on specified minerals produced from these claims. We have the right to acquire, at any time, 40% of the 2.5% royalty (ie, a 1% royalty, leaving a 1.5% royalty) for US$1,000,000.

 

To maintain the options, the following payments and work commitments are required:

 

    Mountain Gold Claims LLC     King Solomon Gold LLC     Ely Gold Royalties  
Year   Share
issuances
    Advance
royalty
payments
    Annual work     Advance
royalty
payments
    Annual work     Advance
royalty
payments
 
2019   US$ 50,000     US$ 10,000     US$ 25,000     US$ 5,000     US$ 5,000     US$ 5,000  
2020           20,000       50,000       10,000       25,000       10,000  
2021     150,000       30,000       75,000       15,000       50,000       15,000  
2022           40,000       100,000       20,000       75,000       20,000  
2023     250,000       50,000       100,000       25,000       100,000       25,000  
Each year 2024 to 2027           75,000       100,000       30,000       100,000       50,000  
2028           75,000       100,000       30,000       100,000       400,000  
Each year 2029 to 2038           100,000       100,000       50,000       100,000        

 

We do not currently consider Monitor Gold to be a material project to the Company.

 

Page 9

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

4. Selected Annual Information

 

The following table is based on financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS and are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars.

 

    2018     2017 1     2016 1     Discussion
Exploration expense   $ 22,833     $ 12,184     $ 785     In 2017 substantially all our exploration spending was focused on Cerro Quema.  We acquired Camino Rojo in November 2017.  During 2018 we conducted substantial exploration activities at both Cerro Quema and Camino Rojo.
General and administrative     561       346       179     Increase is commensurate with increased activity.
Professional fees     593       297       162     Increased audit and legal fees due to multiple jurisdictions and increased complexity within the business.
Regulatory and transfer agent     278       81       48     Increased fees due to increased market capitalization.  In 2018, we commenced trading on the TSX.
Salaries and wages     1,722       1,402       370     In 2016 we had limited activity and limited staffing.  We increased our staffing upon the acquisition of Cerro Quema at the end of 2016.
Depreciation     153       9       1     Depreciation in 2016 and 2017 was included within exploration expenses.
Share based payments     3,985       3,698       707     As a result of the increased activity and staffing after 2016, the Company granted significantly more options in 2017 and 2018 than in 2016.
Interest income     (442 )     (187 )     (67 )   Greater average cash balances on hand due to financings.
Fair value changes on the Goldcorp loan     505                 In 2018, we received an interest free loan from Goldcorp related to the Camino Rojo project.  No such loan was outstanding in 2017.
Finance costs           20            
Foreign exchange     (275 )     562       114     Fluctuations in the Canadian dollar.
Impairment of mineral properties           261           In 2017 we wrote off the capitalized costs of the Blue Quartz project.
Impairment of investment in common shares                 970     Decrease in the value of Pershimco shares from the time of acquiring them to the closing of the transaction to acquire 100% of Pershimco.
Loss on disposal of equipment           27            
Net loss   $ 29,913     $ 18,700     $ 3,269      

 

 

1 Restated due to a change in accounting policy (see note 3 of the accompanying financial statements)

 

Page 10

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

5. Summary of Quarterly Results

 

The following table is based on financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. The figures have been restated because of a change in accounting policy (see note 3 of the financial statements) and are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars.

 

    2018-Q4     2018-Q3     2018-Q2     2018-Q1     2017-Q4     2017-Q3     2017-Q2     2017-Q1  
Exploration expense   $ 6,066     $ 7,056     $ 4,438     $ 5,273     $ 3,156     $ 2,804     $ 3,635     $ 2,589  
General and administrative     183       144       126       108       88       82       70       106  
Professional fees     176       79       202       136       46       43       90       118  
Regulatory and transfer agent     205       19       14       40       1       6       26       48  
Salaries and wages     836       422       230       234       813       210       177       202  
Depreciation     40       40       37       36       3       2       2       2  
Share based payments     1,065       601       1,523       796       812       822       2,064        
Interest income     (105 )     (134 )     (117 )     (86 )     (35 )     (50 )     (51 )     (51 )
Fair value changes     187       153       100       65       8       3       5       4  
Foreign exchange     (133 )     10       (146 )     (6 )     (258 )     472       248       100  
Impairment common shares                             27                    
Impairment mineral properties                             261                    
Net loss   $ 8,520     $ 8,390     $ 6,407     $ 6,596     $ 4,922     $ 4,394     $ 6,266     $ 3,118  
                                                                 
Loss per share (basic and diluted)   $ 0.05     $ 0.05     $ 0.04     $ 0.04     $ 0.03     $ 0.03     $ 0.05     $ 0.03  

 

During 2017, we focused our exploration activity almost entirely on Cerro Quema, as we did not acquire the Camino Rojo project until the end of 2017. In 2018, we conducted work on both Cerro Quema and Camino Rojo. Quarterly variations are due to seasonality (rainy season) for drilling activities and awaiting results from previous quarters’ exploration activities.

 

Administrative costs have trended with the level of activity of the Company. Professional fees have trended with (a) the general activity level of the Company, and (b) major regulatory events such as financings and public listings. The increase in regulatory fees in 2018-Q4 is due to a one-time initial listing fee as the Company started trading on the TSX Exchange.

 

The increase in salaries and wages in 2017-Q4 was related to an accrual of short-term incentive (bonus) payments, as was the increase in 2018-Q3. In 2018-Q4, we accrued for payments related to the departure of the former CEO, which were paid subsequent to the year end.

 

Share based payments expense is generally related to the number of unvested stock options and RSUs outstanding during the quarter. The grants typically happen during Q2 of each year; consequently, those quarters tend to be greater than others. The increase in share-based payments in 2018-Q4 was related to options and bonus shares granted to the incoming CEO.

 

Interest income is directly related to cash on hand, and prevailing interest rates, as we typically invest in higher quality interest-bearing instruments and term deposits. Included within “finance costs” above is fair value adjustment on the loan from Goldcorp, from which we commenced receiving advances in 2018-Q1.

 

Foreign exchange gains and losses vary based on fluctuation of the Canadian dollar versus foreign currency amounts on hand. We tend to hold most of our funds in Canadian dollars until needed.

 

In 2017-Q4, we wrote off the Blue Quartz project.

 

Page 11

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

Annual Information Form

Year ended December 31, 2018 

Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

6. Fourth Quarter of 2018

 

The following table is based on financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. The figures have been restated because of a change in accounting policy (see note 3 of the financial statements) and are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars.

 

A. Comparison to the previous quarter

 

    2018-Q4     2018-Q3     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense   $ 6,066     $ 7,056     $ (990 )   Decreased drilling and land payments at Camino Rojo.
General and administrative     183       144       39      
Professional fees     176       79       97     Increased due to TSX listing, regulatory, and prospectus.
Regulatory and transfer agent     205       19       186     One-time initial listing fees in Q4 for TSX Exchange.
Salaries and wages     836       422       414     Accrual in Q4 for former CEO costs.
Depreciation     40       40            
Share based payments     1,065       601       464     Option grant and bonus shares to incoming CEO.
Interest income     (105 )     (134 )     29      
Fair value changes     187       153       34     Another loan advance in Q4, which led to a larger fair value change in the Goldcorp loan.
Foreign exchange     (133 )     10       (143 )    
Net loss   $ 8,520     $ 8,390     $ 130      
                             

 

B. Comparison to the same quarter last year

 

    2018-Q4     2017-Q4     Difference     Discussion
Exploration expense   $ 6,066     $ 3,156     $ 2,910     Activity at both Cerro Quema and Camino Rojo in 2018.
General and administrative     183       88       95     Overall increased activity over last year.
Professional fees     176       46       130     Legal fees in 2018 related to TSX listing and prospectus.
Regulatory and transfer agent     205       1       204     One-time initial listing fees in Q4 for TSX Exchange.
Salaries and wages     836       813       23      
Depreciation     40       3       37     Site-related depreciation was included in exploration.
Share based payments     1,065       812       253     Option grant and bonus shares to incoming CEO.
Interest income     (105 )     (35 )     (70 )   Greater cash balances on hand, higher interest rates.
Fair value changes     187       8       179     Fair value change of the Goldcorp loan.  None in 2017.
Foreign exchange     (133 )     (258 )     125      
Impairments           288       (288 )   No impairment in 2018.  Wrote off Blue Quartz in 2017.
Net loss   $ 8,520     $ 4,922     $ 3,598      

 

Page 12

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Management’s Discussion and Analysis    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

7. Liquidity

 

Historically the Company's sole source of funding has been the issuance of equity securities for cash, primarily through private placements to sophisticated investors and institutions. We have issued common share capital in many of the past few years, pursuant to private placement financings and the exercise of warrants and options. Our access to exploration financing is always uncertain, and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant equity funding.

 

We had working capital of approximately $13.6 million as at December 31, 2018, compared with $4.8 million at December 31, 2017. We expect to fund the operating costs of the Company over the next twelve months with cash on hand and we expect we will conclude further equity financings over the next twelve months.

 

8. Capital Resources

 

As part of the acquisition of the Camino Rojo Project in November 2017, Goldcorp agreed to provide interest free loans to the Company for all annual land holding costs as they are incurred at Camino Rojo until December 31, 2019, which loans are to be repaid upon commercial production at Camino Rojo. To December 31, 2018, a total of MXN 122 million ($8.2 million) had been advanced pursuant to this agreement (to December 31, 2017 – nil). To the date of this MD&A, a total of MXN 173 million ($12.0 million) had been advanced to the Company. We will avail ourselves of these loans during 2019 to make our land payments. Accordingly, we believe the Company has sufficient capital resources to maintain its properties in good standing for the next twelve months.

 

The Company had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2018 nor as of the date of this MD&A. We have no other lines of credit or sources of financing which have been arranged but are as yet unused.

 

Our ability to carry out our long range strategic objectives in future periods depends on our ability to raise financing from lenders, shareholders and other investors. We continue to regularly review and consider financing alternatives to fund the Company’s ongoing activities.

 

Page 13

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Management’s Discussion and Analysis    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

9. Use of Proceeds

 

On February 15, 2018, the Company completed a brokered financing of 17,581,200 units at a price of $1.75 for gross proceeds of $30,767,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. The Company incurred issuance costs of $1,777,000.

 

As detailed in the table below comparing the approximate use of proceeds from the Company’s offering of units completed in February 2018 and the actual amounts spent as of December 31, 2018, the Company has yet to spend the full amount allocated under the February 2018 prospectus. It is likely we will spend the full amount allocated to activities in the table below in upcoming financial periods. Further, there have been no variances to the use of proceeds in the February 2018 prospectus, material or otherwise, that have impacted the Company’s ability to achieve its business objectives and milestones as disclosed in the February 2018 prospectus.

 

in thousands of Canadian dollars   Intended use
of proceeds
per Feb 2018
prospectus
    Spent to
December 31
 2018
 
Camino Rojo Project                
Project management   $ 400     $ 298  
Drilling (core, metallurgy)     4,300       1,985  
Engineering, technical studies and geology     3,500       1,379  
Environment, CSR, permitting, ejido     1,800       99  
Field & site support     1,200       1,840  
Value-added taxes (IVA)     1,300       743  
Cerro Quema project                
Drilling     1,900       1,958  
Environment, CSR, permitting, community     2,000       315  
Engineering, technical studies and geology     2,000       911  
Camp and support, and project management     1,500       1,170  
Salaries and benefits     2,000       1,713  
Other                
Exploration and project evaluation     850       772  
Working capital and general corporate     2,335       2,810  
Total:   $ 25,085     $ 15,993  

 

At the Camino Rojo project, our intent was to complete a PEA, which was completed in Q2 of 2018. Our intent was also to drill regional targets but the regional work focused mainly on target identification rather than drilling. Much of the CSR and land payments were funded via an interest free loan from Goldcorp. Work continues on advancing the project.

 

At the Cerro Quema project, our intent was to collect the geological, geophysical, and other data required to support the undertaking of an updated mineral resource estimate and a pre-feasibility study on the project. We conducted exploration drilling and metallurgical drilling and completed IP surveys in furtherance of these objectives.

 

10. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements requiring disclosure under this section.

 

Page 14

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Management’s Discussion and Analysis    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

11. Related Party Transactions

 

This information is provided in note 14 of the accompanying quarterly financial statements.

 

12. Critical Accounting Estimates

 

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

We review estimates and their underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.

 

Judgements, estimates, and assumptions that we have made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in these consolidated financial statements include:

 

A. Functional currency

 

The functional currency for the parent entity and each of its subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Determination of functional currency involves judgements to identify the primary economic environment. We reconsider the functional currency of each entity if there is a change in the underlying transactions, events and conditions which we used to determine the primary economic environment of that entity.

 

B. Business combinations

 

Determining whether a set of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute the acquisition of a business or the acquisition of an asset requires us to make certain judgements as to whether or not the assets acquired and liabilities assumed include the inputs, processes and outputs necessary to constitute a business as defined in IFRS 3 «Business Combinations». If an acquired set of assets and liabilities includes goodwill, the set is presumed to be a business. Based on an assessment of relevant facts and circumstances, management of the Company concluded that the acquisitions of Cerro Quema in 2016 and of Camino Rojo in 2017 were acquisitions of assets. The values assigned to common shares, stock options and warrants issued and the allocation of the purchase price to the net assets in the acquisition were based on estimates and judgements including discount rates, volatility, expected option and warrant lives and the relative fair values of the net assets.

 

C. Exploration and evaluation expenditures

 

The application of the Company’s accounting policy for E&E expenditure requires judgement to determine whether future economic benefits are likely from either future exploitation or sale (prior to which we expense all E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we capitalize the acquisition costs). It also requires us to make judgements on whether activities have reached a stage that permits development of the mineral resource (prior to which they are treated as E&E expenditures, and subsequent to which we treat such costs as projects under development and construction).

 

We must also apply a number of estimates and assumptions, such as the determination of the quantities and types of mineral resources, which itself involves varying degrees of uncertainty depending on resource classification (measured, indicated or inferred). These estimates directly impact accounting decisions related to our E&E expenditures.

 

We must make certain estimates and assumptions about future events and circumstances, particularly, whether economic mineral exploitation is viable. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure is unlikely, we assess indicators of impairment and may conclude to write off such amounts to the statement of profit or loss.

 

Page 15

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Management’s Discussion and Analysis    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

D. Title to mineral properties

 

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. Further, we make judgements for properties where concessions terms have expired, and a renewal application has been made and is awaiting approval. We use judgement as to whether the concession renewal application is probable to be received, but ultimately this is beyond our control. If a renewal application is not approved, we could lose rights to those concession.

 

E. Assessment of impairment indicators

 

We apply judgement in assessing whether indicators of impairment or reverse impairment exist for our E&E assets which could result in a test for impairment. We consider internal and external factors, such as our rights to explore, planned expenditures on E&E activities, the technical results of our E&E activities, and the potential for viable operations, to determine whether there are any indicators of impairment or reversal of a previous impairment.

 

F. Share based payments

 

We issue, grant or award different types of share based payments. These include warrants, options, restricted share units, deferred share units, and bonus shares.

 

We make judgments of expected forfeiture rates, the expected lives of these instrument, expected volatilities, and risk free interest rates. In a unit offering, we prorate the proceeds between common shares and warrants using the relative fair value method, the allocation of which requires significant judgement. In the case of bonus shares we use our judgement to estimate expected vesting periods and vesting probabilities.

 

G. Site closure provisions

 

We make estimates and assumptions in determining the provisions for asset retirement and site closure. The ultimate rehabilitation costs are uncertain, and cost estimates can vary in response to many factors, including judgements of the extent of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, and regulatory changes. We make estimates of rehabilitation costs and of cost increases, inflation rates, and discount rates. These uncertainties will result in actual future expenditures differing from the amounts currently provided. Consequently, there could be significant adjustments to the provisions established, which would affect future financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position.

 

13. Change in Accounting Policies including Initial Adoption

 

A. IFRS 15 «Revenue from Contracts with Customers»

 

We adopted IFRS 15 effective January 1, 2018.

 

IFRS 15 introduced a five-step approach to revenue recognition. Under IFRS 15, an entity recognizes revenue when a performance obligation is satisfied, which occurs when the customer has acquired control of the goods transferred.

 

As we have no metal sales, the adoption of this new standard had no material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or changes in financial position.

 

Page 16

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Management’s Discussion and Analysis    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

B. IFRS 9 «Financial Instruments»

 

We adopted IFRS 9 on a retrospective basis without the restatement of comparative periods.

 

The key requirements of IFRS 9 as they relate to the Company include the following:

 

· Subsequent to initial measurement at fair value, all recognized financial assets that are within the scope of IFRS 9 must be subsequently measured at amortized cost or fair value. Financial assets that are held within a business model whose objective is to collect the contractual cash flows, and that have contractual cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding are generally measured at amortized cost in subsequent periods. Those financial assets that have a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting the contractual cash flows and selling financial assets, are generally measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVOCI”). All other financial assets are measured at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”) in subsequent accounting periods.

 

· On initial recognition, for an equity investment that is not held for trading, the Company may irrevocably elect to present subsequent changes in the investment’s fair value through OCI, with only dividend income generally recognized in profit or loss.

 

· Transaction costs for financial assets held at FVTPL are expensed. For all other financial assets, they are recognized at fair value at initial measurement less any directly attributable transaction costs.

 

· The classification of financial liabilities determines the method by which the financial liabilities are carried on the balance sheet subsequent to inception and how changes in their fair value are recorded. Financial liabilities are designated as either: (i) FVTPL; or (ii) other financial liabilities which are classified and subsequently measured at amortized cost.

 

· At each reporting date, we assess whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. For financial assets measured at amortized cost, and debt investments at FVOCI, we apply the expected credit loss model. The adoption of the expected credit loss model did not result in a material adjustment on adoption.

 

None of the Company’s classifications of its financial instruments have changed as a result of the adoption of IFRS 9.

 

C. IFRS 16 «Leases»

 

A new accounting standard applicable to the Company, IFRS 16 «Leases», has an effective date of January 1, 2019. We have not chosen to early-adopt this new standard. This new standard specifies how to recognise, measure, present, and disclose leases. The standard provides a single lessee accounting model, requiring lessees to recognise assets and liabilities for all leases unless they fall within permitted exemptions.

 

To prepare for this standard, we trained our accounting staff on the new standard, built a database of existing agreements which may contain leases as defined in the new standard, and reviewed contracts which may be affected by the change. We availed ourselves of the recognition exemptions permitted in the standard (by excluding low value leases and short term leases), and concluded that we have no leases requiring recognition pursuant to the new standard. Consequently, we expect no material effects of this new standard to our financial position, changes in financial position, and results of operations.

 

Page 17

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.    
Management’s Discussion and Analysis    
Year ended December 31, 2018   Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

14. Financial Instruments

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is inherently exposed to certain financial risks, including market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk, through the use of financial instruments. The timeframe and the manner in which we manage these risks varies based upon our assessment of these risks and available alternatives for mitigation. We do not acquire or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All transactions undertaken are to support our operations.

 

A discussion of these financial risks and our exposure to them is provided in note 18 of the accompanying financial statements.

 

15. Outstanding Share Data

 

As of the date of this MD&A, the Company had the following equity securities outstanding:

 

· 179,493,510 common shares

 

· 18,528,100 warrants

 

· 9,124,005 stock options

 

· 1,500,000 bonus shares

 

· 248,000 restricted share units

 

· 180,000 deferred share units

 

You can find further details about these potentially issuable securities in note 13 of the accompanying financial statements.

 

Page 18

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

16. Risks and Uncertainties

 

As the Company has not commenced principal operations, historical revenue and expenditure trends are not indicative of future activity. The Company has committed to certain work expenditures and may enter into future agreements. The ability of the Company to fund its future operations and commitments is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing. Risks of the Company’s business include the following:

 

Permits and Licenses

 

The exploitation and development of mineral properties may require the Company to obtain regulatory or other permits and licenses from various governmental licensing bodies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain all necessary permits and licenses that may be required to carry out exploration, development and mining operations on its properties.

 

The Company is awaiting mineral concession renewals at its Cerro Quema Project. There is no assurance that we will receive necessary approvals or extensions, or receive them within a reasonable period of time. Failure to receive the permits or extensions would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations.

 

Foreign Country and Political Risk

 

The Company’s principal mineral properties are located in Mexico and Panama. The Company is subject to certain risks, including currency fluctuations, possible political or economic instability that may result in the impairment or loss of mineral titles or other mineral rights, opposition from environmental or other non-governmental organizations, and mineral exploration and mining activities may be affected in varying degrees by political stability and government regulations relating to the mining industry. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the control of the Company and may adversely affect its business. Exploration and development may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on future exploitation and production, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange controls, income taxes, royalties on production, expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine and/or site safety.

 

Operating in developing economies such as Mexico and Panama has certain risks, including changes to, or invalidation of, government mining regulations; expropriation or revocation of land or property rights; changes in foreign ownership rights; changes in foreign taxation rates; security issues; corruption; uncertain political climate; narco-terrorist actions or activities; and lack of a stable economic climate.

 

We do not ordinarily carry political risk insurance.

 

Dependence on Exploration-Stage Properties

 

The Company’s current efforts are focused primarily on exploration stage properties. The Camino Rojo and the Cerro Quema Projects may not develop into commercially viable ore bodies, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s potential mineral resource production, profitability, financial performance and results of operations.

 

Estimates of Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves and Production Risks

 

The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates included in this MD&A are estimates based on a number of assumptions, including those stated herein, and any adverse change to those assumptions could require the Company to lower its mineral resource estimate. Until a deposit is actually mined and processed, the quantity and grades of mineral resources must be considered as estimates only. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. In addition, the quantity and/or economic viability of mineral resources may vary depending on, among other things, metal prices, grades, production costs, stripping ratios, recovery rates, permit regulations and other legal requirements, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions. Any material change in the quantity of mineral resources, grade or stripping ratio may affect the economic viability of the Company’s properties. No assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of minerals will in fact be realized or that an identified mineral resource will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) deposit that can be legally and economically exploited. There can also be no assurance that any discoveries of new mineral reserves will be made. Any material reductions in estimates of mineral resources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

 

Page 19

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

The Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate assumes that the Company can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Company

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Company’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Company. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by another mining company (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) dated June 19, 2018, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Company intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Company or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The PEA was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the PEA.

 

Mineral resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions

 

The estimation of mineral resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

In particular, the estimation of mineral resources for the Camino Rojo Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Company believes that the mineral resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached.

 

Although all mineralization included in the Company’s mineral resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Company, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the mineral resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in mineral resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Mining Industry

 

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the current exploration programs planned by the Company will result in a profitable commercial mining operation.

 

Page 20

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on many factors, some of which are the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as metal prices which are highly cyclical and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

 

Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk. The Company’s operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration and development of ore, including unusual and unexpected geology formations, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. The Company’s mineral exploration activities are directed towards the search, evaluation and development of mineral deposits. There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Company as described herein will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of ore. There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the discovery and acquisition of properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company will compete with other interests, many of which with greater financial resources, for the opportunity to participate in promising projects. Significant capital investment is required to achieve commercial production from successful exploration efforts.

 

Government Regulation

 

The exploration activities of the Company are subject to various federal, provincial and local laws governing prospecting, development, taxes, labour standards, toxic substances and other matters. Exploration activities are also subject to various federal, provincial and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, and land reclamation. These laws also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Although the Company’s exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations governing operations and exploration activities, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations, amendments to current laws and regulations or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Company’s activities.

 

Title Matters

 

Although the Company has diligently investigated title to all mineral concessions (either granted or under re-application) and, to the best of its knowledge (except as otherwise disclosed herein), titles to all its properties are in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to any of the Company’s mineral properties and any of the Company’s properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected encumbrances or defects or governmental actions.

 

Land Title

 

The Company has investigated ownership of all surface rights in which it has an interest, and, to the best of its knowledge, its ownership rights are in good standing. However, all surface rights may be subject to prior claims or agreement transfers, and rights of ownership may be affected by undetected defects. While to the best of the Company's knowledge, titles to all surface rights are in good standing; however, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title. Other parties may dispute title to the surface rights in which the Company has an interest. The properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and titles may be affected by undetected defects.

 

Environmental Risks and Hazards

 

All phases of the Company’s mineral exploration operations are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulations, laws and permits, if any, will not adversely affect the Company’s operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which the Company holds interests which are unknown to the Company at present, which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties. The Company may become liable for such environmental hazards caused by previous owners and operators of the properties even where it has attempted to contractually limit its liability.

 

Page 21

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

Government approvals and permits are currently, and may in the future be, required in connection with the Company’s operations. To the extent such approvals are required and not obtained; the Company may be curtailed or prohibited from proceeding with planned exploration or development of mineral properties.

 

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

 

Commodity Prices

 

The profitability of mining operations is significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold and other minerals. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of these minerals and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in metal prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The price of gold and other minerals has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future serious price declines could cause commercial production to be impracticable.

 

Uninsured Risks

 

The Company carries insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as it considers adequate. Risks not insured against include environmental pollution or other hazards against which such corporations cannot insure or against which they may elect not to insure.

 

Compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws

 

Orla is subject to various anti-corruption laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (1999). In general, these laws prohibit a company and its employees and intermediaries from bribing or making other prohibited payments to foreign officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. The Company’s primary operations are located in Panama, a country which is perceived as having fairly high levels of corruption. Orla cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future anti- corruption regulatory requirements to which the Company’s operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

 

Failure to comply with the applicable legislation and other similar foreign laws could expose the Company and/or its senior management to civil and/or criminal penalties, other sanctions and remedial measures, legal expenses and reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the applicable anti-corruption legislation by Canadian or foreign authorities could also have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

As a consequence of these legal and regulatory requirements, the Company has instituted policies with regard to business ethics, which have been designed to ensure that Orla and its employees comply with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance or guarantee that such efforts have been and will be completely effective in ensuring the Company’s compliance, and the compliance of its employees, consultants, contractors and other agents, with all applicable anticorruption laws and regulations.

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

Certain directors of the Company also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in natural resource exploration and development. Consequently, there exists the possibility for such directors to be in a position of conflict. Any decision made by such directors involving the Company will be made in accordance with their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with the Company and such other companies. In addition, such directors will declare, and refrain from voting on, any matter in which such directors may have a conflict of interest.

 

Page 22

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

17. Forward Looking Statements

 

This MD&A contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding planned exploration and development programs and expenditures, the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, expectations on the potential extension of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema project; proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema project and the Camino Rojo project; Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits, required agreements with third parties and regulatory approvals, including but not limited to, the receipt of the Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) permit related to the Cerro Quema project and other necessary permitting required to implement expected future exploration plans; community and ejido relations; availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of mineral reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; currency and interest rate fluctuations. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the future price of gold, anticipated costs and the Company’s ability to fund its programs, the Company’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities, the Company’s ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements, the timing and results of drilling programs, the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Company’s mineral properties, the obtaining of an agreement with the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein) to develop the entire Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate, the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects, the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, the Company’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner and the Company’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements include, among others: (i) failure to obtain required regulatory and stock exchange approvals with respect to any Offering; (ii) uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; (iii) delays in or failure to obtain an agreement with the Adjacent Owner with respect to the Camino Rojo Project; (iv) health, safety and environmental risks; (v) success of exploration, development and operations activities; (vi) risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; (vii) delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; (viii) delays in getting access from surface rights owners; (ix) uncertainty in estimates of production, capital and operation costs and potential for production and cost overruns; (x) the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; (xi) the fluctuating price of gold; (xii) assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; (xiii) uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; and (xiv) the Company’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions.

 

Page 23

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risks and Uncertainties” in this MD&A for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this MD&A and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. You are urged to read the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which you can view online under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com

 

 

18. Abbreviations Used

 

$, or C$ Canadian dollars
   
US$ United States dollars
   
AIF Annual Information Form
   
Ag Silver
   
Au Gold
   
Camino Rojo Report An independent technical report for the Camino Rojo Project entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 (the “Camino Rojo Report”) prepared by Carl E. Defilippi, RM, SME of Kappes Cassiday & Associates (“KCA”), Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. of Resource Geosciences Incorporated (“RGI”), and Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM of Independent Mining Consultants Inc. (“IMC”).  
   
Canplats Canplats Resources Corporation
   
Cerro Quema Report or
2014 PFS
An independent technical report for the Cerro Quema Project entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014 (the “Cerro Quema Report”) prepared by Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA.  
   
CFE Comisión Federal de Electricidad, the state-owned electric utility of Mexico
   
Company Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Page 24

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis  
Year ended December 31, 2018 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated

 

CSR Community and Social Responsibility
   
ESIA Estudio de Impacto Ambiental, a Panamanian environmental impact study
   
g/t Grams per metric tonne
   
Goldcorp Goldcorp Inc.
   
ha Hectares
   
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
   
IP Induced polarization
   
K tonnes Thousands of metric tonnes
   
Koz Thousands of troy ounces
   
M&I Measured and indicated
   
MD&A Management's Discussion and Analysis
   
NI 43-101 Canadian National Instrument 43-101
   
PEA Preliminary Economic Assessment
   
PFS Pre-Feasibility Study
   
RC Reverse circulation
   
SEDAR

The System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval, a filing system operated by the Canadian Securities Administrators, accessible at:

www.sedar.com

   
tonne 1,000 kilograms (approximately 2,205 pounds)
   
TSX Toronto Stock Exchange

 

Page 25

 

Exhibit 99.86

 

 

NEWS RELEASE

 

 

 

ORLA MINING FILES FINAL BASE SHELF PROSPECTUS IN PREPARATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CAMINO ROJO OXIDE PROJECT

 

VANCOUVER, BC – March 11, 2019 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the "Company") is pleased to announce that it has filed a final short form base shelf prospectus (the “Shelf Prospectus”) in order to maintain financial flexibility as Orla continues to advance the Camino Rojo Oxide Project towards a construction decision later this year and ensuring the Company remains on track with the development of its first mine. The Shelf Prospectus has been filed with the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces and territories of Canada, except Quebec. The Company has no immediate intentions to undertake an offering of securities under the Shelf Prospectus.

 

The Shelf Prospectus will enable Orla to make offerings of up to $300 million of any combination of common shares, debt securities, subscription receipts, units and warrants (collectively, the "Securities") during the 25-month period that the Shelf Prospectus remains valid. The nature, size and timing of such financings, if any, will depend, in part, on Orla’s assessment of its requirements for funding and general market conditions. Unless otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement relating to a particular offering of Securities, the net proceeds from any sale of any Securities is expected to be used to advance the development of the Camino Rojo and Cerro Quema Projects and for general corporate purposes. The specific terms of any future offering of Securities will be established in a prospectus supplement to the Shelf Prospectus, which supplement will be filed with the applicable Canadian securities regulatory authorities. A copy of the Shelf Prospectus is available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or on the Company’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of Securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to the registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. The Securities have not been, nor will they be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements.

 

Technical Report

 

As a result of a review by the British Columbia Securities Commission conducted in connection with the filing of the Shelf Prospectus, the Company has filed an amended technical report on the Camino Rojo Project entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment, Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” (the "Amended Report"), dated March 11, 2019. The Amended Report is available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the Company's website.

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 1240- 1140 Pender St. W, Vancouver BC V6E 4G1 www.orlamining.com     1

 

 

 

The Amended Report includes enhanced disclosure in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 in order to add clarity on certain risks related to the mineral resource estimation, including the portion of the Camino Rojo mineral resource estimate located at depth, on Orla’s property, that would require an agreement to access the neighboring property to enable a larger sulphide development option. The mineral resource estimate contained in the previous version of the technical report along with the results of the preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) have not changed. In the Company’s view, none of the changes made in the Amended Report are material.

 

PEA Summary and Feasibility Study

 

Orla continues to advance the feasibility study work on the Camino Rojo Project, which is expected to be completed by the end of the second quarter of this year. Construction is expected to start during the second half of 2020 following receipt of all necessary permits.

 

Last May, Orla released the results of the Camino Rojo PEA which supports a technically simple open-pit mine and heap-leach operation that offers low capital and operating costs, rapid payback, and strong financial performance. The PEA is based on near-surface oxide and partly oxidized (transitional) material within the overall resource, all located within Orla’s mineral concessions. Key highlights are summarized in the table below.

 

PEA Highlights Base Case (in USD)
Pre -Tax - Net Present Value (5%) / Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) $231 million / 38.1%
After-Tax - Net Present Value (5%) / IRR $121 million / 24.5%
Payback 3.3 years
Production Rate per Day 18,000 tonnes
Total Material to Leach Pad 42.5M tonnes
Average Grade Au / Ag (g/t) 0.71 / 13.56
Contained gold / silver ounces 966,000 / 18,517,000
Average Recovery Au / Ag 67% / 15%
Average Annual gold Production 97,500 ounces
Strip Ratio 0.58
Initial Capex $125 million
Avg. LOM production costs (per tonne of material processed) $8.02
Total By-Product Cash Cost1 ($/oz Au) $499
All-In Sustaining Cost1 ($/oz Au) $555
Gold Price (US$/oz) $1,250
Silver Price (US$/oz) $17.00

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 1240- 1140 Pender St. W, Vancouver BC V6E 4G1 www.orlamining.com     2

 

 

 

 

 

The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes the use of inferred mineral resources, which are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves and there is no certainty that PEA results will be realized. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

 

Qualified Persons

 

The technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Carl Defilippi, RM SME, Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM, and Matthew Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G, each of whom is an Independent Qualified Person under NI 43-101 standards.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned and covers over 200,000 hectares. The Amended Report for Camino Rojo dated March 11, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the possibility of an offering under the Shelf Prospectus, the results of the PEA, including expected production, potential payback, internal rate of return, sensitivities, taxes, net present value, potential recoveries, design parameters, operating costs, capital costs, economic potential; the timing and costs for production decisions; the timelines for the development and growth of the projects and the Company’s objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

Non-IFRS Measures

 

The Company has included certain non-IFRS performance measures as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers and the non-IFRS measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.

 

Cash Costs per Ounce – the Company calculated cash costs per ounce by dividing the sum of operating costs, royalty costs, production taxes, refining and shipping costs, net of by-product silver credits, by payable gold ounces. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, the Company believes that this measure will be useful to external users in assessing operating performance.

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 1240- 1140 Pender St. W, Vancouver BC V6E 4G1 www.orlamining.com     3

 

 

 

 

All-In Sustaining Costs (“AISC”) – the Company has disclosed an AISC performance measure that reflects all of the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from operations. While there is no standardized meaning of the measure across the industry, the Company's definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. The Company believes that this measure will be useful to external users in assessing operating performance and the ability to generate free cash flow from current operations.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Etienne Morin, Chief Financial Officer

Email: info@orlamining.com

Tel: 604-564-1852

 

ORLA MINING LTD - Suite 1240- 1140 Pender St. W, Vancouver BC V6E 4G1 www.orlamining.com     4

 

 

Exhibit 99.87

 

This short form prospectus is referred to as a short form base shelf prospectus and has been filed under legislation in each of the provinces and territories of Canada, other than Québec, that permits certain information about these securities to be determined after this prospectus has become final and that permits the omission from this prospectus of that information. The legislation requires the delivery to purchasers of a prospectus supplement containing the omitted information within a specified period of time after agreeing to purchase any of these securities.

 

No securities regulatory authority has expressed an opinion about these securities and it is an offence to claim otherwise. This short form base shelf prospectus constitutes a public offering of these securities only in those jurisdictions where they may be lawfully offered for sale and therein only by persons permitted to sell such securities. Information has been incorporated by reference in this prospectus from documents filed with securities commissions or similar authorities in Canada. Copies of the documents incorporated herein by reference may be obtained on request without charge from the Corporate Secretary of Orla Mining Ltd. at Suite 1240, 1140 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 4G1, telephone (604) 564-1852, and are also available electronically at www.sedar.com or on Orla Mining Ltd.’s website at www.orlamining.com.

 

SHORT FORM BASE SHELF PROSPECTUS

 

New Issue      March 11, 2019

 

 

ORLA MINING LTD.

 

$300,000,000
Common Shares
Warrants
Subscription Receipts
Units
Debt Securities

 

This short form base shelf prospectus (this “Prospectus”) relates to the offering for sale from time to time (each, an “Offering”), during the 25-month period that this Prospectus, including any amendments hereto, remains effective, of the securities of Orla Mining Ltd. (“Orla” or the “Corporation”) listed above (the “Securities”) in one or more series or issuances, with a total offering price of such Securities, in the aggregate, of up to $300,000,000 (or the equivalent thereof in other currencies). The Securities may be offered separately or together, in amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined based on market conditions at the time of the sale and set forth in an accompanying prospectus supplement (a “Prospectus Supplement”).

 

Owning Securities may subject you to tax consequences. Such tax consequences are not described in this Prospectus and may not be fully described in any applicable Prospectus Supplement. You should read the tax discussion in any Prospectus Supplement with respect to a particular Offering and consult your own tax advisor with respect to your own particular circumstances.

 

A Canadian securities regulator has NOT approved or disapproved the Securities offered hereby or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this Prospectus or determined if this prospectus IS truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offence.

 

 

 

All information permitted under applicable law to be omitted from this Prospectus will be contained in one or more Prospectus Supplements that will be delivered to purchasers together with this Prospectus. Each Prospectus Supplement will be incorporated by reference into this Prospectus for the purposes of securities legislation as of the date of the Prospectus Supplement and only for the purposes of the distribution of the Securities to which the Prospectus Supplement pertains. You should read this Prospectus and any applicable Prospectus Supplement carefully before you invest in any Securities. The Corporation may offer and sell Securities through underwriters or dealers, directly or through agents designated by the Corporation from time to time at amounts and prices and other terms determined by the Corporation. A Prospectus Supplement will set forth the names of any underwriters, dealers or agents involved in the Offering and will set forth the terms of the Offering, the method of distribution of such Securities including, to the extent applicable, the proceeds to the Corporation and any fees, discounts or any other compensation payable to underwriters, dealers or agents and any other material terms of the distribution. In connection with any Offering (unless otherwise specified in a Prospectus Supplement), the underwriters or agents may, subject to applicable law, over-allot or effect transactions that stabilize or maintain the market price of the Securities offered at levels other than that which might otherwise exist in the open market. Such transactions, if commenced, may be interrupted or discontinued at any time. See “Plan of Distribution”. No underwriter has been involved in the preparation of this Prospectus or performed any review of the contents of this Prospectus.

 

Investing in the Securities is speculative and involves certain risks. In particular, the Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate assumes that the Corporation can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Corporation. The risks outlined in this Prospectus and in the documents incorporated by reference herein and in the applicable Prospectus Supplement should be carefully reviewed and considered by prospective investors. See “Risk Factors”.

 

Mr. Charles Jeannes, Mr. Richard Hall, Mr. George Albino and Mr. Tim Haldane, each a director of the Corporation, and Mr. Carl E. Defilippi, Mr. Matthew D. Gray, Mr. Michael G. Hester, Mr. Fred Brown, Mr. Gene Tortelli, Mr. George Lightwood and Mr. Mark Gorman each a qualified person, reside outside of Canada. Each of Mr. Jeannes, Mr. Hall, Mr. Albino and Mr. Haldane have each appointed Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Suite 2200, 885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3E8 as agent for service of process in Canada. Purchasers are advised that it may not be possible for investors to enforce judgments obtained in Canada against any person that resides outside of Canada, even if the party has appointed an agent for service of process.

 

We have filed an undertaking with the British Columbia Securities Commission (the “BCSC”) that we will not distribute in the local jurisdiction under this Prospectus specified derivatives or asset-backed securities that, at the time of distribution, are novel without pre-clearing with the BCSC the disclosure to be contained in the Prospectus Supplement pertaining to the distribution of such securities.

 

The common shares (the “Common Shares”) of the Corporation are listed and posted for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the symbol “OLA”. On March 8, 2019, the last trading day before the date hereof, the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX was $1.10. Unless otherwise specified in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, there is no existing trading market through which the warrants (the “Warrants”), (unless such Warrants are issued under the Corporation’s existing indentures for listed warrants), subscription receipts (the “Subscription Receipts”), units (the “Units”) or debt securities (“Debt Securities”) may be sold and purchasers may not be able to resell such Securities purchased under this Prospectus. This may affect the pricing of such Securities in the secondary market, the transparency and availability of trading prices, the liquidity of such Securities and the extent of issuer regulation.

 

The Corporation’s head and registered office is located at Suite 1240, 1140 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 4G1.

 

ii -

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS 2
   
FINANCIAL INFORMATION 2
   
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION 2
   
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 4
   
THE CORPORATION 5
   
RISK FACTORS 6
   
CONSOLIDATED CAPITALIZATION 7
   
USE OF PROCEEDS 7
   
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION 8
   
EARNINGS COVERAGE RATIOS 9
   
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES 9
   
Common Shares 9
Warrants 9
Subscription Receipts 10
Units 12
Debt Securities 13
   
PRIOR SALES 14
   
PRICE RANGE AND TRADING VOLUMES 14
   
CERTAIN CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES 14
   
LEGAL MATTERS 14
   
INTEREST OF EXPERTS 14
   
STATUTORY RIGHTS OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESCISSION 15
   
CERTIFICATE OF THE CORPORATION 17

 

 

 

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

 

In this Prospectus and in any Prospectus Supplement, unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we”, “us”, “our” or similar terms, as well as references to “Orla Mining” or the “Corporation”, refer to Orla Mining Ltd. together with our subsidiaries.

 

This Prospectus provides you with a general description of the Securities that we may offer. Each time we offer Securities, we will provide a Prospectus Supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that Offering. The Prospectus Supplement may also add, update or change information contained in this Prospectus. Before you invest, you should read both this Prospectus and any applicable Prospectus Supplement.

 

You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this Prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different or additional information. If anyone provides you with different or additional information, you should not rely on it. We are not making an offer to sell or seeking an offer to buy the Securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information contained in this Prospectus or any applicable Prospectus Supplement is accurate only as of the dates on the front of these documents and that information contained in any document incorporated by reference is accurate only as of the date of that document, regardless of the time of delivery or of any sale of the Securities pursuant thereto. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since those dates.

 

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

The financial statements of the Corporation incorporated by reference in this Prospectus have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and are reported in Canadian dollars.

 

The Offering amount in this Prospectus is in Canadian dollars. All currency amounts in this Prospectus are expressed in Canadian dollars.

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

 

This Prospectus contains “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively referred to herein as “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements are included to provide information about management’s current expectations and plans that allows investors and others to get a better understanding of the Corporation’s operating environment, the business operations and financial performance and condition. Forward-looking information is provided as of the date of this Prospectus and the Corporation does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update this forward-looking information, except as required by law.

 

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved (or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of fact and may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the use of proceeds of an Offering, the timing for completion of any Offering, the planned exploration and development programs and expenditures, the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves, expectations on the potential extension of the expired mineral concessions with respect to the Cerro Quema Project (as defined herein); proposed exploration plans and expected results of exploration from each of the Cerro Quema Project and the Camino Rojo Project (as defined herein); Orla’s ability to obtain required mine licences, mine permits and regulatory approvals required in connection with exploration plans and future mining and mineral processing operations; community and ejido relations; availability of sufficient water for proposed operations; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel; changes in commodity prices and exchange rates; currency and interest rate fluctuations.

 

- 2 -

 

 

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Corporation at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies that may cause the Corporation’s actual financial results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied herein. Some of the material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the future price of gold, anticipated costs and the Corporation’s ability to fund its programs, the Corporation’s ability to carry on exploration and development activities, the Corporation’s ability to meet obligations under property agreements, the timing and results of drilling programs, the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Corporation’s mineral properties, the obtaining of an agreement with the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein) to develop the entire Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate, the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction and operation of projects, the costs of operating and exploration expenditures, the Corporation’s ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective manner and the Corporation’s ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms.

 

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others: failure to obtain required regulatory and stock exchange approvals with respect to any Offering; access to additional capital; uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; delays in or failure to obtain an agreement with the Adjacent Owner with respect to the Camino Rojo Project; health, safety and environmental risks; success of exploration, development and operations activities; risks relating to foreign operations and expropriation or nationalization of mining operations; delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; delays in getting access from surface or mining rights owners; uncertainty in estimates in production, capital and operation costs and potential of production and cost overruns; the impact of Panamanian or Mexican laws regarding foreign investment; the fluctuating price of gold; assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; the Corporation’s ability to identify, complete and successfully integrate acquisitions; and volatility in the market price of the Corporation’s securities.

 

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Corporation’s forward-looking statements. Although the Corporation believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” below, and in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the Corporation’s annual information form dated as of August 27, 2018 for the financial year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Annual Information Form”), for additional risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

 

Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date of this Prospectus and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. The Corporation disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. Investors are urged to read the Corporation’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory agencies, which can be viewed online under the Corporation’s profile on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) at www.sedar.com.

 

- 3 -

 

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Information has been incorporated by reference in this Prospectus from documents filed with the securities commissions or similar authorities in Canada. Copies of the documents incorporated herein by reference may be obtained on request without charge from the Corporate Secretary of Orla Mining Ltd. at Suite 1240, 1140 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 4G1, telephone (604) 564-1852, and are also available electronically at www.sedar.com. The filings of the Corporation through SEDAR are not incorporated by reference in this Prospectus except as specifically set out herein.

 

The following documents, filed by the Corporation with the securities commissions or similar authorities in each of the provinces and territories of Canada are specifically incorporated by reference into, and form an integral part of, this Prospectus:

 

(a) the Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2017, dated as of August 27, 2018;

 

(b) the audited consolidated annual financial statements of the Corporation as at, and for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, together with the report of the independent registered public accounting firm thereon and the notes thereto;

 

(c) management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2017;

 

(d) the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial report of the Corporation as at September 30, 2018, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, together with the notes thereto, excluding the notice to reader that the Corporation’s auditor has not performed a review of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements;

 

(e) MD&A for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018;

 

(f) material change report of the Corporation dated February 2, 2018 relating to the Corporation’s offering of units on a bought deal basis; and

 

(g) the management information circular of the Corporation dated May 24, 2018 prepared in connection with the annual and special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation held on June 27, 2018.

 

Any document of the type referred to item 11.1 of Form 44-101F1 Short Form Prospectus under National Instrument 44-101 – Short Form Prospectus Distributions of the Canadian Securities Administrators filed by the Corporation with any securities commissions or similar regulatory authorities in Canada after the date of this Prospectus and all Prospectus Supplements disclosing additional or updated information filed pursuant to the requirements of applicable securities legislation in Canada during the period that this Prospectus is effective shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference in this Prospectus. These documents are available on SEDAR, which can be accessed at www.sedar.com.

 

Any statement contained in a document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for the purposes of this Prospectus to the extent that a statement contained herein, or in any other subsequently filed document which also is incorporated or is deemed to be incorporated by reference herein, modifies or supersedes such statement. The modifying or superseding statement need not state that it has modified or superseded a prior statement or include any other information set forth in the document that it modifies or supersedes. The making of a modifying or superseding statement will not be deemed an admission for any purposes that the modified or superseded statement, when made, constituted a misrepresentation, an untrue statement of a material fact or an omission to state a material fact that is required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances in which it was made. Any statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed in its unmodified or superseded form to constitute a part of this Prospectus.

 

- 4 -

 

 

Upon a new annual information form and the related annual consolidated financial statements being filed by us with the appropriate securities regulatory authorities during the currency of this Prospectus, the previous Annual Information Form, audited consolidated annual financial statements and all unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial reports, material change reports, and all Prospectus Supplements filed by us prior to the commencement of our fiscal year in which the new annual information form and the related annual consolidated financial statements is filed will be deemed no longer to be incorporated by reference in this Prospectus for purposes of future offers of Securities hereunder. Upon a management information circular in connection with an annual meeting being filed by us with the appropriate securities regulatory authorities during the currency of this Prospectus, the management information circular filed in connection with the previous annual meeting (unless such management information circular also related to a special meeting) will be deemed no longer to be incorporated by reference in this Prospectus for purposes of future offers of Securities hereunder.

 

A Prospectus Supplement containing the specific terms of any Offering of Securities will be delivered to purchasers of Securities together with this Prospectus and will be deemed to be incorporated by reference in this Prospectus as of the date of the Prospectus Supplement and only for the purposes of the Offering to which that Prospectus Supplement pertains.

 

THE CORPORATION

 

Orla is a Canadian company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”). The Corporation’s focus is on the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral exploration opportunities in which the Corporation’s exploration and development expertise could substantially enhance shareholder value. Orla is advancing the development of the Camino Rojo project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico (the “Camino Rojo Project”). The Camino Rojo Project is 100% owned and covers over 200,000 hectares. Access and infrastructure is excellent with a paved highway and powerline nearby. A National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) technical report on the Camino Rojo Project dated June 19, 2018 is available on SEDAR under Orla’s profile. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema project in Panama (the “Cerro Quema Project”) which includes mineralized zones with the potential to support a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. Cerro Quema Project’s 14,800-hectare concession is close to infrastructure with easy access to site and strong community support. The Cerro Quema Project is currently in the last stage of the permitting process for a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

For further information regarding Orla, see the Annual Information Form and other documents incorporated by reference in this Prospectus available at www.sedar.com under the Corporation’s profile.

 

Recent Developments

 

Amended Camino Rojo Technical Report

 

On March 11, 2019, the Corporation filed an amended technical report for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Graduation to TSX

 

On November 1, 2018, the Common Shares commenced trading on the TSX. Concurrent with the TSX listing, the Common Shares of the Corporation were de-listed from the TSX Venture Exchange.

 

Appointment of Jason Simpson as new President and CEO

 

On November 12, 2018, Mr. Jason Simpson assumed the role as the Corporation’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). In addition to the role of President and CEO, Mr. Simpson was also appointed a director of the Corporation.

 

- 5 -

 

 

Previous Disclosure of Use of Proceeds

 

Update as to Use of Proceeds

 

As detailed in the table below comparing the approximate use of proceeds from the Corporation’s offering of units completed in February 2018 and the actual amounts spent as of December 31, 2018, the Corporation has yet to spend the full amount allocated under the February 2018 prospectus. The Corporation continues to expect to spend the full amounts allocated in accordance with the table below in upcoming financial periods. To date, there have been no variances to the Corporation’s anticipated use of proceeds as disclosed in February 2018, material or otherwise. Accordingly, there is no impact or change to the Corporation’s ability to achieve its business objectives and milestones as disclosed in the February 2018 prospectus.

 

Use of Proceeds   Expected Use of
Proceeds
(C$)
    Actual Use of
Proceeds as of
December 31, 2018
(C$)
 
Camino Rojo Project                
Project Management     400,000       298,000  
Drilling (core, metallurgy)     4,300,000       1,985,000  
Engineering, Technical Studies & Geology     3,500,000       1,379,000  
Environment, CSR, Permitting, Ejido     1,800,000       99,000  
Field & Site Support     1,200,000       1,840,000  
Value-Added Taxes (IVA)     1,300,000       743,000  
      12,500,000       6,344,000  
Cerro Quema Project                
Drilling     1,900,000       1,958,000  
Environment, CSR, Permitting, Community     2,000,000       315,000  
Engineering, Technical Studies & Geology     2,000,000       911,000  
Camp and Support & Project Management     1,500,000       1,170,000  
Salaries and Benefits     2,000,000       1,713,000  
      9,400,000       6,067,000  
                 
Other                
Exploration and Project Evaluation     850,000       772,000  
Working Capital and General Corporate     2,335,260       2,810,000  
Purposes     3,185,260       3,582,000  
Total:     25,085,260       15,993,000  

 

RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in our Securities involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks described in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” in any Prospectus Supplement and those set forth in documents incorporated by reference in this Prospectus and any applicable Prospectus Supplement, as well as other information in this Prospectus and any applicable Prospectus Supplement, before purchasing any of our Securities. Each of the risks described in these sections and documents could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, and could result in a loss of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

 

Negative Operating Cash Flow

 

The Corporation is an exploration stage company and has not generated cash flow from operations. The Corporation is devoting significant resources to the development of the Camino Rojo Project, the Cerro Quema Project and to actively pursue exploration and development opportunities, however, there can be no assurance that it will generate positive cash flow from operations in the future. The Corporation expects to continue to incur negative consolidated operating cash flow and losses until such time as it achieves commercial production at a particular project. The Corporation currently has negative cash flow from operating activities.

 

The Camino Rojo Project mineral resource estimate assumes that the Corporation can access mineral titles and lands that are not controlled by the Corporation

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the Corporation’s mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by the Corporation. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by another mining company (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner.

 

- 6 -

 

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) dated June 19, 2018, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. The Corporation intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that the Corporation will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to the Corporation or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement. Should an agreement with the Adjacent Owner not be obtained on favourable terms, the economics of any potential mine development using the full mineral resource estimate would be significantly negatively impacted.

 

The PEA was based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the PEA.

 

Mineral resource estimations for the Camino Rojo Project are only estimates and rely on certain assumptions

 

The estimation of mineral resources relies on the judgment of the independent Qualified Person preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.

 

In particular, the estimation of mineral resources for the Camino Rojo Project has assumed that there is a reasonable prospect for reaching an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. While the Corporation believes that the mineral resource estimates for the Camino Rojo Project are well established and reflect best estimates, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend on inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, including the assumption that an agreement with the Adjacent Owner will be reached.

 

Although all mineralization included in the Corporation’s mineral resource estimate for the Camino Rojo Project are located on mineral concessions controlled by the Corporation, failure to reach an agreement with the Adjacent Owner would result in a significant reduction of the mineral resource estimate by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Any material changes in mineral resource estimates may have a material adverse effect on the Corporation.

 

CONSOLIDATED CAPITALIZATION

 

There has been no material change in the share and loan capital of the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, since September 30, 2018, the date of our most recently filed interim financial statements.

 

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

Unless otherwise indicated in a Prospectus Supplement, we currently expect to use the net proceeds from the sale of Securities offered hereby to fund ongoing work programs to advance the Camino Rojo Project, to fund ongoing work programs to advance the Cerro Quema Project, to actively pursue exploration and development opportunities and for working capital and general corporate purposes. Any specific allocation of the net proceeds of an Offering to a specific purpose will be determined at the time of the Offering and will be described in the relevant Prospectus Supplement. The Corporation generates no operating revenue from the exploration activities on its property interests and has negative cash flow from operating activities. The Corporation anticipates that it will continue to have negative cash flow until such time that commercial production is achieved at a particular project. To the extent that the Corporation has negative cash flows in future periods in excess of net proceeds from the sale of Securities, it may need to deploy a portion of net proceeds from the sale of Securities to fund such negative cash flow.

 

- 7 -

 

 

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

 

The Corporation may from time to time, during the 25-month period that this Prospectus remains valid, offer for sale and issue Securities. We may issue and sell up to $300,000,000, in the aggregate, of Securities.

 

We may offer and sell the Securities through underwriters or dealers, directly to one or more purchasers or through agents. We may offer Securities in the same offering, or we may offer Securities in separate offerings. Each Prospectus Supplement, to the extent applicable, will describe the number and terms of the Securities to which such Prospectus Supplement relates, the name or names of any underwriters or agents with whom we have entered into arrangements with respect to the sale of such Securities, the public offering or purchase price of such Securities and our net proceeds. The Prospectus Supplement also will include any underwriting discounts or commissions and other items constituting underwriters’ compensation and will identify any securities exchanges on which the Securities may be listed.

 

The Securities may be sold, from time to time, in one or more transactions at a fixed price or prices, which may be changed, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing market price, at varied prices determined at the time of sale, or at negotiated prices, including sales in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market distributions” as defined in National Instrument 44-102 – Shelf Distributions, including sales made directly on the TSX or other existing trading markets for the Securities. The prices at which the Securities may be offered may vary as between purchasers and during the period of distribution. If, in connection with the Offering of the Securities at a fixed price or prices, the underwriters have made a bona fide effort to sell all of the Securities at the initial offering price fixed in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, the public offering price may be decreased and thereafter further changed, from time to time, to an amount not greater than the initial offering price fixed in such Prospectus Supplement, in which case the compensation realized by the underwriters will be decreased by the amount that the aggregate price paid by purchasers for the Securities is less than the gross proceeds paid by the underwriters to the Corporation. We will obtain any requisite exemptive relief prior to conducting “at-the-market distributions”.

 

Only underwriters named in the Prospectus Supplement are deemed to be underwriters in connection with such Securities offered by that Prospectus Supplement.

 

Under agreements which may be entered into by us, underwriters, dealers and agents who participate in the distribution of Securities may be entitled to indemnification by us against certain liabilities, including liabilities under applicable Canadian securities legislation, or to contribution with respect to payments which such underwriters, dealers or agents may be required to make in respect thereof. The underwriters, dealers and agents with whom we enter into agreements may be customers of, engage in transactions with, or perform services for, us in the ordinary course of business.

 

Agents, underwriters or dealers may make sales of Securities in privately negotiated transactions and/or any other method permitted by law, including sales deemed to be an “at-the-market distribution” as defined in NI 44-102 and subject to limitations imposed by and the terms of any regulatory approvals required and obtained under, applicable Canadian securities laws which includes sales made directly on an existing trading market for the Common Shares, or sales made to or through a market maker other than on an exchange. In connection with any Offering of Securities, other than an “at the market distribution”, the underwriters may over-allot or effect transactions which stabilize or maintain the market price of the Securities offered at a level above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market. Such transactions, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.

 

No underwriter or dealer involved in an “at the market distribution” as defined under applicable Canadian securities legislation, no affiliate of such underwriter or dealer and no person acting jointly or in concert with such underwriter or dealer has over-allotted, or will over allot, our securities in connection with an Offering of Securities or effect any other transactions that are intended to stabilize the market price of our securities.

 

We may authorize agents or underwriters to solicit offers by eligible institutions to purchase Securities from us at the public offering price set forth in the applicable Prospectus Supplement under delayed delivery contracts providing for payment and delivery on a specified date in the future. The conditions to these contracts and the commission’s payable for solicitation of these contracts will be set forth in the applicable Prospectus Supplement.

 

- 8 -

 

 

Each class or series of Securities, other than the Common Shares, will be a new issue of Securities with no established trading market. Subject to applicable laws, any underwriter may make a market in such Securities, but will not be obligated to do so and may discontinue any market making at any time without notice. There may be limited liquidity in the trading market for any such Securities. Unless otherwise specified in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, we do not intend to list any of the Securities other than the Common Shares on any securities exchange. Consequently, unless otherwise specified in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, there is no market through which the Warrant, Subscription Receipts, Units or Debt Securities may be sold and purchasers may not be able to resell any such Securities purchased under this Prospectus. This may affect the pricing of the Warrant, Subscription Receipts, Units or Debt Securities in the secondary market, the transparency and availability of trading prices, the liquidity of such Securities and the extent of issuer regulation. No assurances can be given that a market for trading in Securities of any series or issue will develop or as to the liquidity of any such market, whether or not the Securities are listed on a securities exchange.

 

EARNINGS COVERAGE RATIOS

 

The applicable Prospectus Supplement will provide, as required, the earnings coverage ratios with respect to the issuance of Debt Securities pursuant to such Prospectus Supplement.

 

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

 

Common Shares

 

The Corporation is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Common Shares. As of March 8, 2019, there were 179,493,510 Common Shares issued and outstanding.

 

Holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive notice of any meetings of shareholders of the Corporation, to attend and to cast one vote per Common Share at all such meetings. Holders of Common Shares do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors and, accordingly, holders of a majority of the Common Shares entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all directors standing for election. Holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis such dividends, if any, as and when declared by the Corporation’s board of directors at its discretion from funds legally available for the payment of dividends and upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis the net assets of the Corporation after payment of debts and other liabilities, in each case subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to any other series or class of shares ranking senior in priority to or on a pro rata basis with the holders of Common Shares with respect to dividends or liquidation. The Common Shares do not carry any pre-emptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights, nor do they contain any sinking or purchase fund provisions.

 

Warrants

 

As of March 8, 2019, there were 3,000,000 Warrants expiring November 7, 2022, 6,737,500 Warrants expiring July 8, 2021 and 8,790,600 Warrants expiring February 15, 2021. The Corporation may issue Warrants to purchase Common Shares. Warrants may be issued independently or together with other Securities and may be attached to or separate from those Securities. Warrants will be issued under one or more warrant indentures, including supplemental indentures to one of our existing warrant indentures, to be entered into between the Corporation and one or more banks or trust companies acting as warrant agent, to be named in the relevant Prospectus Supplement, which will establish the terms and conditions of the Warrants. A copy of any warrant indenture or supplemental warrant indenture relating to an offering of Warrants will be filed by us with the securities regulatory authorities in applicable Canadian offering jurisdictions after we have entered into it.

 

The following description sets forth certain general terms and provisions of the Warrants and is not intended to be complete. You should read the particular terms of the Warrants that are offered by us, which will be described in more detail in any applicable Prospectus Supplement. The statements made in this Prospectus relating to any warrant indenture and Warrants to be issued thereunder are summaries of certain anticipated provisions thereof and are subject to, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, all provisions of the applicable warrant indenture and the Prospectus Supplement describing such warrant indenture. The Prospectus Supplement will also state whether any of the general provisions summarized below do not apply to the Warrants being offered.

 

- 9 -

 

 

Any Prospectus Supplement relating to any Warrants the Corporation offers will describe the terms of the Warrants and include specific terms relating to their Offering. This description will include, where applicable:

 

· the designation and aggregate number of Warrants offered;
· the price at which the Warrants will be offered;
· the currency or currencies in which the Warrants will be offered;
· the date on which the right to exercise the Warrants will commence and the date on which the right will expire;
· the number of Common Shares that may be purchased upon exercise of each Warrant and the price at which and currency or currencies in which the Common Shares may be purchased upon exercise of each Warrant;
· the terms of any provisions allowing or providing for adjustments in (i) the number and/or class of shares that may be purchased, (ii) the exercise price per share, or (iii) the expiry of the Warrants;
· whether we will issue fractional shares;
· whether we have applied to list the Warrants on a stock exchange;
· the designation and terms of any Securities with which the Warrants will be offered, if any, and the number of the Warrants that will be offered with each Security;
· the date or dates, if any, on or after which the Warrants and the related Securities will be transferable separately;
· whether the Warrants will be subject to redemption and, if so, the terms of such redemption provisions;
· material Canadian federal income tax consequences of owning the Warrants; and
· any other material terms or conditions of the Warrants.

 

Prior to the exercise of their Warrants, holders of Warrants will not have any of the rights of holders of the securities subject to the Warrants.

 

Subscription Receipts

 

As of March 8, 2019, there are no Subscription Receipts outstanding. The Corporation may issue Subscription Receipts that will entitle holders to receive, upon satisfaction of certain release conditions and for no additional consideration, Common Shares, Warrants, Units, Debt Securities, or any combination thereof. Subscription Receipts will be issued pursuant to one or more subscription receipt agreements (each, a “Subscription Receipt Agreement”), each to be entered into between the Corporation and an escrow agent (the “Escrow Agent”), to be named in the relevant Prospectus Supplement, which will establish the terms and conditions of the Subscription Receipts. Each Escrow Agent will be a financial institution organized under the laws of Canada or a province thereof and authorized to carry on business as a trustee. If underwriters or agents are used in the sale of any Subscription Receipts, one or more of such underwriters or agents may also be a party to the Subscription Receipt Agreement governing the Subscription Receipts sold to or through such underwriter or agent. A copy of any Subscription Receipt Agreement will be filed by us with the securities regulatory authorities in applicable Canadian offering jurisdictions after we have entered into it.

 

The following description sets forth certain general terms and provisions of Subscription Receipts and is not intended to be complete. You should read the particular terms of the Subscription Receipts that are offered by us, which will be described in more detail in any applicable Prospectus Supplement. The statements made in this Prospectus relating to any Subscription Receipt Agreement and Subscription Receipts to be issued thereunder are summaries of certain anticipated provisions thereof and are subject to, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, all provisions of the applicable Subscription Receipt Agreement and the Prospectus Supplement describing such Subscription Receipt Agreement. The Prospectus Supplement will also state whether any of the general provisions summarized below do not apply to the Subscription Receipts being offered.

 

Any Prospectus Supplement relating to any Subscription Receipts the Corporation offers will describe the terms of the Subscription Receipts and include specific terms relating to their Offering. All such terms will comply with the requirements of the TSX relating to Subscription Receipts. This description will include, where applicable:

 

· the designation and aggregate number of Subscription Receipts offered;
· the price at which the Subscription Receipts will be offered;
· the currency or currencies in which the Subscription Receipts will be offered;

 

- 10 -

 

 

· the designation, number and terms of the Common Shares, Warrants, Units, Debt Securities or any combination thereof to be received by holders of Subscription Receipts upon satisfaction of the release conditions, and the procedures that will result in the adjustment of those numbers;
· the conditions (the “Release Conditions”) that must be met in order for holders of Subscription Receipts to receive for no additional consideration Common Shares, Warrants, Units, Debt Securities or any combination thereof;
· the procedures for the issuance and delivery of the Common Shares, Warrants, Units, Debt Securities or any combination thereof to holders of Subscription Receipts upon satisfaction of the Release Conditions;
· whether any payments will be made to holders of Subscription Receipts upon delivery of the Common Shares, Warrants, Units, Debt Securities or any combination thereof upon satisfaction of the Release Conditions;
· the identity of the Escrow Agent;
· the terms and conditions under which the Escrow Agent will hold all or a portion of the gross proceeds from the sale of Subscription Receipts, together with interest and income earned thereon (collectively, the “Escrowed Funds”), pending satisfaction of the Release Conditions;
· the terms and conditions pursuant to which the Escrow Agent will hold the Common Shares, Warrants, Units, Debt Securities or any combination thereof pending satisfaction of the Release Conditions;
· the terms and conditions under which the Escrow Agent will release all or a portion of the Escrowed Funds to the Corporation upon satisfaction of the Release Conditions;
· if the Subscription Receipts are sold to or through underwriters or agents, the terms and conditions under which the Escrow Agent will release a portion of the Escrowed Funds to such underwriters or agents in payment of all or a portion of their fees or commission in connection with the sale of the Subscription Receipts;
· procedures for the refund by the Escrow Agent to holders of Subscription Receipts of all or a portion of the subscription price for their Subscription Receipts, plus any pro rata entitlement to interest earned or income generated on such amount, if the Release Conditions are not satisfied;
· any entitlement of the Corporation to purchase the Subscription Receipts in the open market by private agreement or otherwise;
· whether the Corporation will issue the Subscription Receipts as global securities and, if so, the identity of the depositary for the global securities;
· whether the Corporation will issue the Subscription Receipts as bearer securities, registered securities or both;
· provisions as to modification, amendment or variation of the Subscription Receipt Agreement or any rights or terms attaching to the Subscription Receipts, including upon any subdivision, consolidation, reclassification or other material change of the Common Shares, Warrants, Debt Securities or other securities of the Corporation, any other reorganization, amalgamation, merger or sale of all or substantially all of the Corporation's assets or any distribution of property or rights to all or substantially all of the holders of Common Shares;
· whether we have applied to list the Subscription Receipts on a stock exchange;
· material Canadian federal tax consequences of owning the Subscription Receipts; and
· any other material terms or conditions of the Subscription Receipts.

 

The holders of Subscription Receipts will not be shareholders of the Corporation. Holders of Subscription Receipts are entitled only to receive Common Shares, Warrants, Units, Debt Securities or any combination thereof on satisfaction of the conditions provided in the Subscription Receipt Agreement, including the satisfaction of any cash payment provided in the Subscription Receipt Agreement, if the Release Conditions are satisfied. If the Release Conditions are not satisfied, holders of Subscription Receipts shall be entitled to a refund of all or a portion of the subscription price therefor and all or a portion of the pro rata share of interest earned or income generated thereon, as provided in the Subscription Receipt Agreement.

 

- 11 -

 

 

Escrow

 

The Subscription Receipt Agreement will provide that the Escrowed Funds will be held in escrow by the Escrow Agent, and such Escrowed Funds will be released to the Corporation (and, if the Subscription Receipts are sold to or through underwriters or agents, a portion of the Escrowed Funds may be released to such underwriters or agents in payment of all or a portion of their fees in connection with the sale of the Subscription Receipts) at the time and under the terms specified by the Subscription Receipt Agreement. If the Release Conditions are not satisfied, holders of Subscription Receipts will receive a refund of all or a portion of the subscription price for their Subscription Receipts plus their pro rata entitlement to interest earned or income generated on such amount, in accordance with the terms of the Subscription Receipt Agreement. The Common Shares, Warrants, Units, Debt Securities or any combination thereof may be held in escrow by the Escrow Agent, and will be released to the holders of Subscription Receipts following satisfaction of the Release Conditions at the time and under the terms specified in the Subscription Receipt Agreement.

 

Rescission

 

The Subscription Receipt Agreement will also provide that any material misrepresentation in this Prospectus, the Prospectus Supplement under which the Subscription Receipts are offered, or any amendment hereto or thereto, will entitle each initial purchaser of Subscription Receipts to a contractual right of rescission following the issuance of the Common Shares, Warrants or Debt Securities to such purchaser entitling such purchaser to receive the amount paid for the Subscription Receipts upon surrender of the Common Shares, Warrants or Debt Securities, provided that such remedy for rescission is exercised in the time stipulated in the Subscription Receipt Agreement. This right of rescission does not extend to holders of Subscription Receipts who acquire such Subscription Receipts from an initial purchaser, on the open market or otherwise.

 

Global Securities

 

The Corporation may issue Subscription Receipts in whole or in part in the form of one or more global securities, which will be registered in the name of and be deposited with a depositary, or its nominee, each of which will be identified in the applicable Prospectus Supplement. The global securities may be in temporary or permanent form. The applicable Prospectus Supplement will describe the terms of any depositary arrangement and the rights and limitations of owners of beneficial interests in any global security. The applicable Prospectus Supplement will also describe the exchange, registration and transfer rights relating to any global security.

 

Modifications

 

The Subscription Receipt Agreement will provide for modifications and alterations to the Subscription Receipts issued thereunder by way of a resolution of holders of Subscription Receipts at a meeting of such holders or by a consent in writing from such holders. The number of holders of Subscription Receipts required to pass such a resolution or execute such a written consent will be specified in the Subscription Receipt Agreement. The Subscription Receipt Agreement will also specify that the Corporation may amend any Subscription Receipt Agreement and the Subscription Receipts, without the consent of the holders of the Subscription Receipts, to cure any ambiguity, to cure, correct or supplement any defective or inconsistent provision, or in any other manner that will not materially and adversely affect the interests of the holders of outstanding Subscription Receipts or as otherwise specified in the Subscription Receipt Agreement.

 

Units

 

As of March 8, 2019, there are no Units outstanding. The Corporation may issue Units consisting of one or more Common Shares, Warrants, Subscription Receipts, Debt Securities or any combination of such Securities. You should read the particular terms of the Units that are offered by us, which will be described in more detail in any applicable Prospectus Supplement.

 

Any Prospectus Supplement relating to any Units the Corporation offers will describe the terms of the Units and include specific terms relating to their Offering. This description will include, where applicable:

 

· the designation and aggregate number of Units being offered;
· the price at which the Units will be offered;
· the designation and terms of the Units and the applicable Securities included in the Units;
· the description of the terms of any agreement governing the Units;
· any provision for the issuance, payment, settlement, transfer or exchange of the Units;
· the date, if any, on and after which the Units may be transferable separately;
· whether we have applied to list the Units on a stock exchange;
· material Canadian federal tax consequences of owning the Units;

 

- 12 -

 

 

· how, for federal income tax purposes, the purchase price paid for the Units is to be allocated among the component Securities; and
· any other material terms or conditions of the Units.

 

Debt Securities

 

As of March 8, 2019, there are no Debt Securities outstanding. The Corporation may issue Debt Securities which may or may not be converted into Common Shares. The Corporation may issue the Debt Securities independently or together with any underlying Securities. The Corporation may also issue a series of Debt Securities under one or more separate indenture agreements to be entered into between us and a financial institution to which the Trust and Loan Companies Act (Canada) applies or a financial institution organized under the laws of any province of Canada and authorized to carry on business as a trustee. A copy of any indenture will be filed by us with the securities regulatory authorities in applicable Canadian offering jurisdictions after we have entered into it. We may from time to time issue Debt Securities and incur additional indebtedness otherwise than through the offering of Debt Securities pursuant to this Prospectus.

 

The following description sets forth certain general terms and provisions of Debt Securities and is not intended to be complete. You should read the particular terms of the Debt Securities that are offered by us, which will be described in more detail in any applicable Prospectus Supplement. The statements made in this Prospectus relating to any indenture agreement and Debt Securities to be issued thereunder are summaries of certain anticipated provisions thereof and are subject to, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, all provisions of the applicable indenture agreement and the Prospectus Supplement describing such indenture agreement. The Prospectus Supplement will also state whether any of the general provisions summarized below do not apply to the Debt Securities being offered.

 

Any Prospectus Supplement relating to any Debt Securities the Corporation offers will describe the terms of the Debt Securities and include specific terms relating to their Offering. This description will include, where applicable:

 

· the specific designation, any limit on the aggregate principal amount and authorized denominations of such Debt Securities;
· the currency for which the Debt Securities may be purchased and the currency in which the principal and any interest is payable (in either case, if other than Canadian dollars);
· the percentage of the principal amount at which such Debt Securities will be issued;
· the date or dates on which such Debt Securities will mature and the portion (if less than all of the principal amount) of the offered Debt Securities to be payable upon declaration of acceleration of maturity;
· the rate or rates (which may be fixed or variable, if any) at which such Debt Securities will bear interest (if any), or the method of determination of such rates (if any);
· the dates on which any such interest will be payable and the record dates for such payments;
· any mandatory or optional redemption or sinking fund provisions, including the period or periods within which, the price or prices at which and the terms and conditions on which the Debt Securities may be redeemed or purchased at the option of the Corporation or otherwise;
· any exchange or conversion terms, including whether such Debt Securities are convertible, exchangeable or exercisable into other Securities of the Corporation;
· whether the Debt Securities will be issuable in registered or bearer form or both or in the form of temporary or permanent global securities and the basis of exchange, transfer and ownership thereof;
· any provisions permitting or restricting the issuance of additional Securities, the incurring of additional indebtedness or other material negative covenants;
· each office or agency where the principal of, premium (if any) on and interest on the Debt Securities will be payable, and each office or agency where the Debt Securities may be presented for registration of transfer or exchange; and
· any other specific terms of the Debt Securities including covenants and events of default relating solely to the applicable series of Debt Securities or any covenants or events of default generally applicable to other series of Debt Securities which are not to apply to the applicable series of Debt Securities.

 

- 13 -

 

 

Debt Securities may be issued bearing no interest or interest at a rate below or above the prevailing market rate at the time of issuance and may be offered and sold at a discount below or premium above their stated principal amounts.

 

Each series of Debt Securities may be issued at various times with different maturity dates, may bear interest at different rates and may otherwise vary.

 

The Debt Securities will be direct, unsecured obligations of the Corporation. The Debt Securities will be senior or subordinated indebtedness of the Corporation as described in the relevant Prospectus Supplement.

 

This Prospectus does not qualify for issuance of Debt Securities in respect of which the payment of principal and/or interest may be determined, in whole or in part, by reference to one or more underlying interests including, for example, an equity or debt security, a statistical measure of economic or financial performance including, but not limited to, any currency, consumer price or mortgage index, or the price or value of one or more commodities, indices or other items, or any other item or formula, or any combination or basket of the foregoing items. For greater certainty, this Prospectus may qualify for issuance Debt Securities in respect of which the payment of principal and/or interest may be determined, in whole or in part, by reference to published rates of a central banking authority or one or more financial institutions, such as a prime rate or bankers’ acceptance rate, or to recognized market benchmark interest rates such as LIBOR, EURIBOR or a U.S. Federal funds rate.

 

The foregoing summary of certain of the principal provisions of the Securities is a summary of anticipated terms and conditions only and is qualified in its entirety by the description in the applicable Prospectus Supplement under which any Securities are being offered.

 

PRIOR SALES

 

Information in respect of Common Shares that we issued within the previous 12 month period, and in respect of securities that are convertible or exchangeable into Common shares, will be provided as required in a Prospectus Supplement with respect to the issuance of Securities pursuant to such Prospectus Supplement.

 

PRICE RANGE AND TRADING VOLUMES

 

The Common Shares are listed and posted for trading on the TSX under the symbol “OLA”. Information in respect of trading price and volume of the Common Shares during the previous 12 month period will be provided as required in a Prospectus Supplement with respect to the issuance of Securities pursuant to such Prospectus Supplement.

 

CERTAIN CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

 

The applicable Prospectus Supplement will include a general summary of certain Canadian federal income tax consequences which may be applicable to a purchaser of Securities hereunder.

 

LEGAL MATTERS

 

Certain legal matters in connection with the Securities offered hereby will be passed upon on behalf of the Corporation by Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP.

 

INTEREST OF EXPERTS

 

The following persons have been named as having prepared or certified a report, valuation, statement or opinion described or included in a filing, or referred to in a filing, made under National Instrument 51 – 102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations during, or relating to, the Corporation’s financial year ended December 31, 2017:

 

· Camino Rojo Report – Carl E. Defilippi, RM, SME of Kappes, Cassiday and Associates (“KCA”), Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. of Resource Geosciences Incorporated and Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM of Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. prepared the report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019.

 

- 14 -

 

 

· Cerro Quema Report – Eugene Puritch, P. Eng., Richard H. Sutcliffe, P.Geo., Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo., Antoine Yassa, P.Geo., David Burga, P.Geo., Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng., and Fred Brown, P.Geo., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc., Gene Tortelli, PE, George Lightwood, PE, and David Brown, P.Geo., of Golder Associates Inc., and Mark Gorman, PE of KCA prepared the report entitled “Cerro Quema Project – Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014.

 

None of the foregoing persons, or any director, officer, employee or partner thereof, as applicable, received or has received a direct or indirect interest in the Corporation’s property or the property of any of the Corporation’s associates or affiliates. The foregoing persons held an interest in either less than 1% or none of the Corporation’s securities or the securities of any associate or affiliate of the Corporation at the time of preparation of the respective reports and after the preparation of such reports and estimates, and they did not receive any direct or indirect interest in any of the Corporation’s securities or the securities of any associate or affiliate of the Corporation in connection with the preparation of the above mentioned reports. None of the aforementioned persons nor any director, officer, employee or partner, as applicable, of the aforementioned companies or partnerships is currently expected to be elected, appointed or employed as a director, officer or employee of the Corporation or of any associate or affiliate of the Corporation.

 

All scientific and technical information in this Prospectus has been reviewed and approved by Hans Smit, P.Geo., Chief Operating Officer and a director of the Corporation, who is a “Qualified Person” under NI 43-101. As of the date hereof, Hans Smit holds 2,942,900 Common Shares, 100,000 Warrants, 1,001,991 stock options and 120,000 restricted share units of the Corporation.

 

The Corporation’s independent auditors are Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, who have issued an Independent Auditor’s Report dated April 24, 2018 in respect to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. Davidson & Company LLP has advised the Corporation that they are independent with respect to the Corporation within the meaning of the Chartered Professional Accountants of British Columbia Code of Professional Conduct.

 

The partners and associates of Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, as a group, hold beneficially, directly or indirectly, less than 1% of any class of the Corporation’s securities.

 

STATUTORY RIGHTS OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESCISSION

 

Securities legislation in certain of the provinces and territories of Canada provides purchasers with the right to withdraw from an agreement to purchase securities. This right may be exercised within two business days after receipt or deemed receipt of a prospectus and any amendment. In several of the provinces of Canada, the securities legislation further provides a purchaser with remedies for rescission or, in some jurisdictions, damages if the prospectus and any amendment contains a misrepresentation or is not delivered to the purchaser, provided that the remedies for rescission or damages are exercised by the purchaser within the time limit prescribed by the securities legislation of the purchaser’s province. The purchaser should refer to any applicable provisions of the securities legislation of the purchaser’s province for the particulars of these rights or consult with a legal advisor.

 

Original purchasers of Warrants (if offered separately), Subscription Receipts or convertible securities will have a contractual right of rescission against the Corporation in respect of the exercise of such Warrants or conversion of such Subscription Receipts or convertible securities.

 

The contractual right of rescission will entitle such original purchasers to receive, in addition to the amount paid on original purchase of the Warrant, the Subscription Receipt and the convertible security, as the case may be, the amount paid upon exercise upon surrender of the underlying securities gained thereby, in the event that this Prospectus (as supplemented or amended) contains a misrepresentation, provided that: (i) the exercise takes place within 180 days of the date of the purchase of the Warrant, Subscription Receipt or convertible security under this Prospectus; and (ii) the right of rescission is exercised within 180 days of the date of purchase of the Warrant, Subscription Receipt or convertible security under this Prospectus. This contractual rights of rescission will be consistent with the statutory right of rescission described under section 131 of the Securities Act (British Columbia), and is in addition to any other right or remedy available to original purchasers under section 131 of the Securities Act (British Columbia) or otherwise at law.

 

- 15 -

 

 

In an offering of Warrants, Subscription Receipts or other convertible securities, original purchasers are further advised that in certain provinces the statutory right of action for damages in connection with a prospectus misrepresentation is limited to the amount paid for the security that was purchased under a prospectus, and therefore a further payment at the time of exercise may not be recoverable in a statutory action for damages. This means that, under the securities legislation of certain provinces, if the purchaser pays additional amounts upon conversion, exchange or exercise of such securities, those amounts may not be recoverable under the statutory right of action for damages that applies in those provinces. The purchaser should refer to any applicable provisions of the securities legislation of the purchaser’s province for the particulars of these rights or consult with a legal advisor.

 

- 16 -

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF THE CORPORATION

 

Dated: March 11, 2019

 

This short form prospectus, together with the documents incorporated in the prospectus by reference, will, as of the date of the last supplement to this prospectus relating to the securities offered by this prospectus and the supplement(s), constitute full, true and plain disclosure of all material facts relating to the securities offered by this prospectus and the supplement(s) as required by the securities legislation of each of the provinces and territories, other than Québec.

 

   
(“Signed”) JASON SIMPSON (“Signed”) ETIENNE MORIN
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
   
On behalf of the Board of Directors
   
(“Signed”) CHARLES JEANNES (“Signed”) GEORGE ALBINO
Director Director
   

 

C-1

 

 

Exhibit 99.88

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 

Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Preliminary Economic Assessment 

Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project 

Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico

 

Prepared for:

 

1240 – 1140 West Pender Street

Vancouver, BC, V6E 4G1

Canada

 

 

Prepared by:

 

   

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates 

7950 Security Circle 

Reno, NV 89506

 

 

Report Date: June 19, 2018

Mineral Resource Effective Date: April 27, 2018
Amended: March 11, 2019

Authors:

Carl Defilippi, KCA, RM SME

Dr. Matthew Gray, RGI, CPG

Michael Hester, IMC, FAusIMM

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1

 

  1.1 Introduction and Overview 1-1
       
  1.2 Property Description and Ownership 1-2
       
  1.3 Geology & Mineralization 1-2
       
  1.4 Exploration and Drilling 1-3
       
  1.5 Metallurgical Testwork 1-4
       
  1.6 Mineral Resource Estimate 1-4
       
  1.7 Mining Methods 1-6
       
  1.8 Recovery Methods 1-7
       
  1.9 Infrastructure 1-7
       
  1.10 Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact 1-8
       
  1.11 Capital and Operating Costs 1-9
       
  1.12 Economic Analysis 1-10
       
  1.13 Interpretations and Conclusions 1-13

 

  1.13.1 Conclusions 1-13
       
  1.13.2 Opportunities 1-14
       
  1.13.3 Risks 1-14

       
  1.14 Recommendations 1-15

 

  2.0 INTRODUCTION 2-1

 

  2.1 Introduction and Overview 2-1
       
  2.2 Project Scope and Terms of Reference 2-2

 

  2.2.1 Scope of Work 2-2
       
  2.2.2 Terms of Reference 2-3

 

  2.3 Sources of Information 2-4
       
  2.4 Qualified Persons and Site Visits 2-4
       
  2.5 Forward Looking Information 2-5
       
  2.6 Frequently Used Acronyms, Abbreviations, Definitions and Units of Measure 2-8

 

  3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS 3-1
       
  4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 4-1

 

  4.1 Area and Location 4-1
       
  4.2 Claims and Title 4-2

 

  4.2.1 Orla Control of Mining Concessions via Acquisition from Minera Peñasquito SA de CV 4-6

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-2

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

  4.3 Surface Rights 4-7
       
  4.4 Environmental Liability 4-11
       
  4.5 Permits 4-11
       
  4.6 Access, Title, Permit and Security Risks 4-12

 

  4.6.1 Access Risks 4-12
       
  4.6.2 Title Risks 4-12
       
  4.6.3 Permit Risks 4-12
       
  4.6.4 Security Risks 4-13

 

  5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES AND PHYSIOGRAPHY 5-1

 

  5.1 Accessibility 5-1
       
  5.2 Physiography, Climate and Vegetation 5-3
       
  5.3 Local Resources and Infrastructure 5-4

 

  6.0 HISTORY 6-1

 

  6.1 Prior Ownership 6-1
       
  6.2 Prior Exploration 6-1
       
  6.3 Historical Metallurgical Studies 6-3
       
  6.4 Historical Resource Estimates 6-4

 

  6.4.1 Canplats 6-4
       
  6.4.2 Goldcorp 6-4

 

  6.5 Prior Production 6-6

 

  7.0 GEOLOGICAL HISTORY AND MINERALIZATION 7-1

 

  7.1 Sources of Information 7-1
       
  7.2 Regional Geology 7-1
       
  7.3 Local and Property Geology 7-4

 

  7.3.1 General Deposit Geology 7-4
       
  7.3.2 Structural Setting 7-7
       
  7.3.3 Mineralized Zones 7-7
       
  7.3.4 Alteration 7-11

 

  7.4 Oxidation 7-11
       
  7.5 Conclusions 7-14

 

  8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES 8-1
       
  9.0 EXPLORATION 9-1
       
  10.0 DRILLING 10-1

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-3

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  10.1 General 10-1
       
  10.2 Canplats Drilling 10-2
       
  10.3 Goldcorp Drilling 10-2
       
  10.4 Sampling 10-4
       
  10.5 Conclusions 10-4

 

  11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY 11-1

 

  11.1 Sample Preparation 11-1
       
  11.2 Analyses 11-1
       
  11.3 QA/QC Programs 11-2

 

  11.3.1 Canplats QA/QC Program 11-2
       
  11.3.2 Goldcorp QA/QC Program 11-2

 

  11.4 Sample Security 11-4

 

  12.0 DATA VERIFICATION 12-1
       
  13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING 13-1

 

  13.1 Canplats (2009) 13-1
       
  13.2 Goldcorp (2010-2015) 13-3

 

  13.2.1 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2010-2015) 13-3
       
  13.2.2 Blue Coast Research Metallurgy (2012-2013) 13-10
       
  13.2.3 Hazen Research (2014) 13-11
       
  13.2.4 Comminution Testing 13-12

 

  13.3 Conclusions from Metallurgical Programs 13-13

 

  13.3.1 Crush Size and Recovery 13-13
       
  13.3.2 Leach Cycle 13-16
       
  13.3.3 Reagent Consumption Projection 13-16
       
  13.3.4 Conclusions and Key Design Parameters 13-17

 

  13.4 Sulphide Mineralization Discussion 13-18

 

  14.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES 14-1

 

  14.1 Mineral Resource 14-1

 

  14.1.1 Metal Prices for Mineral Resources 14-4
       
  14.1.2 Cost and Recovery Estimates for Mineral Resources 14-4
       
  14.1.3 Parameters for Mill Material 14-7
       
  14.1.4 Additional Information 14-8

 

  14.2 Description of the Block Model 14-11

 

  14.2.1 General 14-11

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-4

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  14.2.2 Geologic Controls 14-11
       
  14.2.3 Cap Grades and Compositing 14-21
       
  14.2.4 Variograms 14-28
       
  14.2.5 Block Grade Estimation 14-35
       
  14.2.6 Resource Classification 14-39
       
  14.2.7 Bulk Density 14-45

 

  15.0 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE 15-1
       
  16.0 MINING METHODS 16-1

 

  16.1 Operating Parameters and Criteria 16-1
       
  16.2 Slope Angles 16-2
       
  16.3 Economic Parameters 16-4
       
  16.4 Final Pit Design 16-6
       
  16.5 Mine Production Schedule 16-7
       
  16.6 Waste Storage Area and Stockpile 16-18
       
  16.7 Mining Equipment 16-20

 

  17.0 RECOVERY METHODS 17-1

 

  17.1 Process Design Basis 17-1
       
  17.2 Crushing 17-5
       
  17.3 Reclamation and Stacking 17-5
       
  17.4 Leach Pad Design 17-8
       
  17.5 Solution Application and Storage 17-10
       
  17.6 Process Water Balance 17-11
       
  17.7 Merrill-Crowe Recovery Plant 17-13

 

  17.7.1 Refinery 17-14
       
  17.7.2 Process Reagents and Consumables 17-15

 

  18.0 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE 18-1

 

  18.1 Infrastructure 18-1

 

  18.1.1 Existing Installations 18-1
       
  18.1.2 Site Roads 18-1
       
  18.1.3 Mine Haulage Road 18-1
       
  18.1.4 Project Buildings 18-1
       
  18.1.5 Mine Camp 18-4
       
  18.1.6 Laboratory 18-4
       
  18.1.7 Fuel Storage and Dispensing 18-4

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-5

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  18.1.8 Magazine Site 18-4

 

  18.2 Power Supply, Communication Systems & IT 18-6

 

  18.2.1 Power Supply 18-6
       
  18.2.2 Site Power Distribution 18-6
       
  18.2.3 Communication Systems & IT 18-6

 

  18.3 Water 18-6

 

  18.3.1 Water Balance 18-6
       
  18.3.2 Potable and Domestic Water 18-7
       
  18.3.3 Fire Water and Protection 18-7

 

  18.4 Sewage 18-7

 

  19.0 MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS 19-1
       
  20.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT 20-1

 

  20.1 Environmental Studies 20-1

 

  20.1.1 Project Area Description 20-1
       
  20.1.2 Environmental Management Plans 20-2
       
  20.1.3 Waste Handling 20-4
       
  20.1.4 Reclamation 20-5
       
  20.1.5 Closure Activities – Heap Leach Facilities 20-7
       
  20.1.6 Post Closure Activities 20-10

 

  20.2 Permitting 20-12
       
  20.3 Social and Community Impact 20-16

 

  21.0 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS 21-1

 

  21.1 Capital Expenditures 21-2

 

  21.1.1 Mining Capital Costs 21-4
       
  21.1.2 Process and Infrastructure Capital Cost Estimate 21-6
       
  21.1.3 Construction Indirect and Other Owner’s Costs 21-11
       
  21.1.4 Initial Fills Inventory 21-11
       
  21.1.5 Contingency 21-11
       
  21.1.6 Working Capital 21-11
       
  21.1.7 Sustaining Capital 21-12

 

  21.2 Operating Costs 21-12

 

  21.2.1 Mining Operating Costs 21-13
       
  21.2.2 Process and G&A Operating Costs 21-18

 

  21.3 Reclamation & Closure Costs 21-21

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-6

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  22.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 22-1

 

  22.1 Summary 22-1
       
  22.2 Sensitivity 22-10

 

  23.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES 23-1
       
  24.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION 24-1
       
  24.1 Project Implementation 24-1

 

  24.2 Sulphides 24-3
       
  24.3 Other Cases 24-3

 

  25.0 INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 25-1

 

  25.1 Conclusions 25-1

 

  25.1.1 Mining 25-1
       
  25.1.2 Metallurgy and Process 25-1

 

  25.2 Opportunities 25-2

 

  25.2.1 Mineral Resource 25-2
       
  25.2.2 Mining 25-2
       
  25.2.3 Metallurgy and Process 25-2
       
  25.2.4 New Mineral Zones 25-2

 

  25.3 Risks 25-3

 

  25.3.1 Mineral Resource 25-3
       
  25.3.2 Mining 25-3
       
  25.3.3 Metallurgy and Process 25-4
       
  25.3.4 Other Risks 25-4

 

  26.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 26-1
       
  27.0 REFERENCES 27-1
       
  28.0 DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE 28-1

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-7

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

LIST OF FIGURES

 

Figure 1-1 After-Tax IRR vs. Gold Price, Capital Cost, and Operating Cost 1-13
   
Figure 1-2 NPV @ 5% vs. Gold Price, Capital Cost, and Operating Cost 1-13
   
Figure 4-1 Location Map, Camino Rojo Project 4-2
   
Figure 4-2 Mining Concessions, Camino Rojo Project 4-5
   
Figure 4-3 Surface Rights in Project Area 4-8
   
Figure 5-1 Project Location and Regional Infrastructure 5-2
   
Figure 5-2 View of Typical Topography and Vegetation at Camino Rojo 5-3
   
Figure 6-1 Historical Drillhole Locations and Project Claim Boundaries 6-3
   
Figure 7-1 Regional Geologic Map (Servicio Geologico Mexicano, 2000) 7-3
   
Figure 7-2 Local Geology, Camino Rojo Deposit (Servicio Geologico Mexicano, 2014) 7-5
   
Figure 7-3 Drillcore from CR12-345D, 818m 7-6
   
Figure 7-4 Drillcore from CR12-345D, 254m 7-6
   
Figure 7-5 Drillcore from CR12-345D, 993m 7-7
   
Figure 7-6 Drillcore from CR12 345D, 395m 7-9
   
Figure 7-7 Drillcore from CR12 345D, 727m 7-10
   
Figure 7-8 Drillcore from CR11 267D, 490m 7-10
   
Figure 7-9 Drillcore from CR11 267D, 473m 7-11
   
Figure 7-10 Drillcore from CR11 258D, 256m 7-13
   
Figure 7-11 Drillcore from CR11 258D, 257m 7-13
   
Figure 10-1 Drilling by Type, IMC 2018 10-5
   
Figure 10-2 Drilling by Company, IMC 2018 10-6
   
Figure 13-1 Preg-Robbing Percentage vs. CIL and Direct Bottle Roll Leach Test Recoveries 13-8
   
Figure 13-2 Preg-Robbing from Leach Percentage vs. Sulphide Content 13-9
   
Figure 13-3 Preg-Robbing from Leach Percentage vs. Organic Carbon Content 13-9
   
Figure 13-4 Preg-Robbing from Leach Percentage vs. Organic Carbon Content 13-10
   
Figure 13-5 Oxide Recovery vs. Crush Size 13-14
   
Figure 13-6 Transition Recovery vs. Crush Size 13-15
   
Figure 14-1 Mineral Resource Cone Shell, IMC 2018 14-10
   
Figure 14-2 Hole and Cross Section Locations, IMC 2018 14-13
   
Figure 14-3 Lithology on Section L112, IMC 2018 14-14
   
Figure 14-4 Alteration on Section L112, IMC 2018 14-16
   
Figure 14-5 Alteration on Section 18, IMC 2018 14-17
   
Figure 14-6 Alteration on Section 29, IMC 2018 14-18
   
Figure 14-7 Oxidation Zones on Section 29, IMC 2018 14-19
   
Figure 14-8 Estimation Domains on Section L112, IMC 2018 14-20

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-8

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Figure 14-9 Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – NE Domain 14-25
   
Figure 14-10 Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – NE Domain 14-25
   
Figure 14-11 Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – SW Domain 14-26
   
Figure 14-12 Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – SW Domain 14-26
   
Figure 14-13 Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – Indidura 14-27
   
Figure 14-14 Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – Indidura 14-28
   
Figure 14-15 NE Domain Gold Variogram – Primary Axis 14-30
   
Figure 14-16 NE Domain Gold Variogram – Secondary Axis 14-31
   
Figure 14-17 NE Domain Gold Variogram – Tertiary Axis 14-32
   
Figure 14-18 SW Domain Gold Variogram – Primary Axis 14-33
   
Figure 14-19 SW Domain Gold Variogram – Down Hole Variogram 14-34
   
Figure 14-20 Gold Grades on Section 29, IMC 2018 14-36
   
Figure 14-21 Gold Grades on Section 18, IMC 2018 14-37
   
Figure 14-22 Gold Grades on Section L112, IMC 2018 14-38
   
Figure 14-23 Average Distance to Nearest 3 and 4 Holes – NE Domain 14-40
   
Figure 14-24 Average Distance to Nearest 3 and 4 Holes – SW Domain 14-41
   
Figure 14-25 Average Distance to Nearest 3 and 4 Holes – Indidura 14-42
   
Figure 14-26 Resource Class on Section 18, IMC 2018 14-43
   
Figure 14-27 Resource Class on Section 29, IMC 2018 14-44
   
Figure 16-1 Slope Angle Recommendations, Piteau 2016 16-3
   
Figure 16-2 Final Pit, IMC 2018 16-8
   
Figure 16-3 End of Year 1, IMC 2018 16-12
   
Figure 16-4 End of Year 2, IMC 2018 16-13
   
Figure 16-5 End of Year 3, IMC 2018 16-14
   
Figure 16-6 End of Year 4, IMC 2018 16-15
   
Figure 16-7 End of Year 5, IMC 2018 16-16
   
Figure 16-8 End of Year 6, IMC 2018 16-17
   
Figure 16-9 Mine Waste Storage Area, IMC 2018 16-19
   
Figure 17-1 Mine Process Overall Flowsheet 17-3
   
Figure 17-2 Mine General Arrangement 17-4
   
Figure 17-3 Crushing & Reclaim 17-7
   
Figure 17-4 Heap Leach Pad 17-9
   
Figure 17-5 Merrill-Crowe Recovery Plant 17-17
   
Figure 18-1 Mine Truck Shop 18-2
   
Figure 18-2 Lab, Warehouse and Administration Buildings 18-3
   
Figure 18-3 Explosives Magazine Site 18-5
   
Figure 20-1 Permitting Process Flowsheet 20-15

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-9

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Figure 22-1 After Tax Sensitivity – IRR 22-11
   
Figure 22-2 After Tax Sensitivity – NPV @ 0% 22-11
   
Figure 22-3 After Tax Sensitivity – NPV @ 5% 22-12
   
Figure 24-1 Project Development & Implementation Schedule 24-2

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-10

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

LIST OF TABLES

 

Table 1-1 Resource Summary 1-5
   
Table 1-2 Capital Cost Summary 1-9
   
Table 1-3 Operating Cost Summary 1-10
   
Table 1-4 Economic Analysis Summary 1-12
   
Table 2-1 Table of Responsibilities by Section 2-7
   
Table 4-1 Listing of Mining Concessions 4-4
   
Table 6-1 2016 Camino Rojo Historical Proven and Probable Mineral Reserve Estimate 6-5
   
Table 6-2 2016 Camino Rojo Historical Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate 6-5
   
Table 6-3 2016 Camino Rojo Historical Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate 6-5
   
Table 10-1 Summary of Camino Rojo Drilling, 2007-2015 10-1
   
Table 13-1 Oxide Column Test Results SGS Mineral Services Minerals 13-2
   
Table 13-2 Transition Column Test Results SGS Mineral Services Minerals 13-2
   
Table 13-3 KCA 2010 Column Leach Test Results on Composites 13-4
   
Table 13-4 KCA 2012 Summary of Column Leach Test Results by Material Type 13-5
   
Table 13-5 KCA 2015 Column Leach Test Results by Lithology 13-6
   
Table 13-6 Preg-Robbing Data Comparison for Camino Rojo 13-7
   
Table 13-7 Summary of Flotation Composite Feed Grades 13-11
   
Table 13-8 Lead Flotation Concentrate Grades 13-11
   
Table 13-9 Zinc Flotation Concentrate Grades 13-11
   
Table 13-10 Comminution Test Results Summary 13-12
   
Table 13-11 Comminution Test Results by Alteration Type 13-13
   
Table 13-12 Estimated Recoveries by Material Type for P80 38mm Crush Size 13-16
   
Table 13-13 Projected Field Cyanide Consumptions by Material Type 13-17
   
Table 13-14 Projected Field Lime Consumptions by Material Type 13-17
   
Table 13-15 Distribution of Metals to Various Sulphide Products 13-19
   
Table 14-1 Mineral Resource 14-3
   
Table 14-2 Economic Parameters for Mineral Resource Estimate 14-6
   
Table 14-3 Treatment Costs for Lead and Zinc Concentrates 14-8
   
Table 14-4 Camino Rojo Model Rock Types (lith) 14-11
   
Table 14-5 Camino Rojo Alteration Types (alt) 14-12
   
Table 14-6 Camino Rojo Oxide-Sulphide Model (oxide) 14-15
   
Table 14-7 Camino Rojo Estimation Domains (domain) 14-15
   
Table 14-8 Cap Grades and Number of Assays Capped 14-21
   
Table 14-9 Summary Statistics of Assays 14-23
   
Table 14-10 Summary Statistics of 5m Composites 14-24

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-11

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 14-11 Specific Gravity and Bulk Density 14-45
   
Table 16-1 Economic Parameters for Mine Design 16-6
   
Table 16-2 Mine Production Schedule 16-9
   
Table 16-3 Proposed Plant Production Schedule 16-10
   
Table 16-4 Proposed Plant Production Schedule by Material Type 16-11
   
Table 16-5 Mine Major Equipment Fleet Requirement 16-20
   
Table 17-1 Processing Design Criteria Summary 17-2
   
Table 17-2 Site-Wide Average Year Water Requirements 17-12
   
Table 17-3 Projected Annual Reagents and Consumables 17-15
   
Table 20-1 Permits Required for Mine Construction 20-13
   
Table 20-2 Permits Required for Mine Operation and Closure 20-14
   
Table 21-1 Capital Cost Summary 21-1
   
Table 21-2 LOM Operating Cost Summary 21-1
   
Table 21-3 Summary of Pre-Production Capital Costs by Area 21-3
   
Table 21-4 Mining Capital Costs 21-5
   
Table 21-5 Summary of Pre-Production Capital Costs by Discipline 21-8
   
Table 21-6 Process Mobile Equipment 21-10
   
Table 21-7 Contract Mining Cost Summary 21-14
   
Table 21-8 Contract Mining Equipment Depreciation 21-17
   
Table 21-9 Contractor Equipment Depreciation 21-18
   
Table 21-10 Process, Support & G&A Operating Cost 21-19
   
Table 22-1 Key Economic Parameters 22-3
   
Table 22-2 Economic Analysis Summary 22-4
   
Table 22-3 Cash Flow Model 22-5
   
Table 22-4 Sensitivity Analysis Results 22-10
   
Table 26-1 Recommendations 26-3

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-12

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

1.1 Introduction and Overview

 

The Camino Rojo project, located in Zacatecas State, Mexico, is 100% owned by Orla Mining Limited (Orla). At the request of Orla, this report was prepared by Kappes, Cassiday and Associates (KCA), Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. (IMC), and Resource Geosciences Incorporated (RGI).

 

The purposes of this Technical Report are as follows:

 

· Develop an NI 43-101 compliant Mineral Resource for the Camino Rojo deposit,

 

· Present the results of a Preliminary Economic Analysis (PEA) for the implementation of open pit mining and heap leaching to recover the gold and silver mineralization, and

 

· Propose additional work required for Preliminary Feasibility or Feasibility level studies.

 

This PEA is preliminary in nature and it includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. The project considers open pit mining of approximately 42.5 million tonnes of material with an estimated grade of 0.71 g/t gold and 13.6 g/t silver. Material from the pit will be crushed to 80% passing 38mm (100% passing 66mm), conveyor stacked onto a heap leach pad and leached using a low concentration sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant where gold and silver will be precipitated from deaerated pregnant solution with zinc dust. The resulting precious metal sludge will be filtered and dried in a mercury retort to produce the final doré product.

 

The average processing throughput for the Camino Rojo project is 18,000 tonnes of material per day. The project will be developed in two stages with expansion of the leach pad and addition of conveying equipment occurring in Year 2 of operation. The scope of this study includes a mine production schedule, as well as costing for all process components and infrastructure required for the operation. This report also presents a mineral resource estimate. The PEA is based on the oxide and transitional portion of this resource.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

1.2 Property Description and Ownership

 

The Camino Rojo project is located in the Municipality of Mazapil, State of Zacatecas, near the village of San Tiburcio. The project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, Zacatecas, and 54 km S-SE of Goldcorp’s Peñasquito Mine. The project area is centered at approximately 244150E 2675900N UTM NAD27 Zone 14N.

 

The project mineral rights are held by Orla’s Mexican subsidiary Minera Camino Rojo S.A. de C.V. (MCR) in 8 mining concessions covering approximately 2,059 square kilometers. Surface rights are held by the Ejido San Tiburcio, a communal agrarian cooperative. Exploration has been carried out under the authority of agreements between the project operators and the Ejido San Tiburcio. There is a temporary occupation with right to expropriate agreement in place with the Ejido San Tiburcio that covers all the area of the resource and area of potential development described in this report. MCR has water rights for sufficient volumes of water to develop the project.

 

1.3 Geology & Mineralization

 

The Camino Rojo project comprises intrusive related, clastic sedimentary strata hosted, polymetallic Au, Ag, As, Zn, and Pb mineralization.

 

The Camino Rojo deposit is hosted by Cretaceous submarine sedimentary strata, dominantly clastic. The most important mineralization host is the Caracol Formation, a rhythmically interbedded sequence of weakly calcareous turbiditic sandstones, siltstones and shales. The underlying Indidura Formation, comprised of regularly bedded reduced siltstones and shales, and the Cuesta del Cura limestone, now recrystallized to white fine grained marble, host a minor amount of sulphide mineralization, but are inconsequential hosts of oxide mineralization. The gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit is situated above, and extends down into, a zone of feldspathic hornfels developed in the sedimentary strata, and variably mineralized dacitic dikes. The mineralized zones correspond to zones of sheeted sulfidic veins and veinlet networks, creating a bulk-mineable style of gold mineralization. Skarn mineralization has been encountered in the deeper portions of the system. The observed geologic and geochemical characteristics of the gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit at Camino Rojo are consistent with those of a distal oxidized gold skarn deposit. The metal suite and style of mineralization at Camino Rojo are similar to the intrusion-related deposits in the Caracol Formation and underlying carbonate rocks adjacent to the diatremes at Peñasquito.

 

For purposes of this study, only the economic potential of the oxide and partially oxidized transitional mineralization amenable to Au and Ag recovery via standard cyanide heap leach processing, is evaluated.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-2

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

1.4 Exploration and Drilling

 

The Camino Rojo deposit was discovered in mid-2007 and was originally entirely concealed beneath post-mineral cover in a broad, low relief alluvial valley adjacent to the western flank of the Sierra Madre Oriental. Mineralized road ballast placed on a dirt road near San Tiburcio, Zacatecas, was traced to its source by geologists Perry Durning and Bud Hillemeyer from La Cuesta International, working under contract to Canplats Resources Corporation (Canplats). A shallow pit excavated through a thin veneer of alluvium, located adjacent to a stock pond (represa) was the discovery exposure of the deposit. Canplats began concurrent programs of surface geophysics and reverse-circulation drilling in late 2007, which continued into 2008.

 

The initial drilling was focused on a 450m x 600m gold in rock geochemical anomaly named the Represa zone. Core drilling began in 2008. The geophysical survey defined two principal areas of high chargeability: one centered on the Represa zone and another 1 km to the west named the Don Julio zone. The elevated chargeability zones were interpreted as large volumes of sulphide mineralized rocks. Drilling by Canplats, and later drilling by Goldcorp Inc. (Goldcorp), confirmed the presence of extensive sulphide mineralization at depth in the Represa zone, and much lower quantities of sulphide minerals at Don Julio.

 

By August of 2008, Canplats drilled a total of 92 reverse-circulation, and 30 diamond-core holes, for a total of 23,988m and 16,044m respectively, mainly focused in the Represa zone.

 

Canplats was acquired by Goldcorp in early 2010. Validation, infill, condemnation, and expansion drilling began in January 2011. By the end of 2015, a total of 279,788m of new core drilling in 415 drillholes and 20,569m of new RC drilling in 96 drillholes was completed in the Represa and Don Julio zones and their immediate surroundings. An additional 31,286m of shallow RAB-style, RC drilling in 306 drillholes was completed, with most of the RAB drilling testing other exploration targets within the concession. Airborne gravity, magnetic and TEM surveys were also carried out.

 

As of the end of 2015 a total of 295,832m in 445 diamond core holes, 44,557m in 188 RC drillholes, and 31,286m of RAB drilling had been completed. Orla acquired the project from Goldcorp in 2017 and through the effective date of this report, has completed approximately 1,850m of additional drilling in 10 diamond core holes for metallurgical sampling and 1,900m of drilling in 6 reverse circulation holes testing for water.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-3

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

1.5 Metallurgical Testwork

 

Metallurgical test work programs on the Camino Rojo project were commissioned by the prior operators of the project, Canplats Mexico and Goldcorp, and are considered as historical data. No metallurgical studies have been conducted by Orla at this time.

 

Based on the metallurgical data available, the Camino Rojo deposit shows significant variability in gold recoveries based on material type and geological domain with preg-robbing organic carbon being the only significant deleterious element identified. In general, recoveries for gold and silver are good and will yield acceptable results using conventional heap leaching methods with cyanide.

 

Key design parameters from the metallurgical test work are summarized below:

 

· Crush size of 80% passing 38mm.

 

· Estimated gold recoveries (including 2% field deduction) of 70%, 58%, 60% and 49% for Kp Oxide, Ki Oxide, Transition-hi and Transition-lo materials, respectively.

 

· Estimated silver recoveries (including 3% field deduction) of 13%, 20%, 17% and 20% for Kp Oxide, Ki Oxide, Transition-hi and Transition-lo materials, respectively.

 

· Design leach cycle of 80 days.

 

· Average cyanide consumption of 0.35 kg/t material.

 

· Average lime consumption of 1.25 kg/t material.

 

Additional column leach tests should be conducted to confirm recoveries at coarser crush sizes, especially for the Ki material type which has very little data available, in an effort to mitigate any associated risk.

 

1.6 Mineral Resource Estimate

 

The mineral resource includes potential mill resources and the potential heap leach resources, which are oxide dominant and are the emphasis of this PEA study.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-4

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

For the leach resource, measured and indicated mineral resources amount to 100.8 million tonnes at 0.734 g/t gold, 12.67 g/t silver, 0.21% lead, and 0.37% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 2.38 million ounces gold, 41.1 million ounces of silver, 455.8 million pounds of lead, and 814.8 million pounds of zinc. Inferred mineral resource is an additional 4.9 million tonnes at 0.772 g/t gold, 5.60 g/t silver, 0.07% lead, and 0.24% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 120,600 ounces of gold, 874,000 ounces of silver, 7.0 million pounds of lead, and 25.9 million pounds of zinc for the inferred mineral resource.

 

For the mill resource, measured and indicated mineral resources amount to 254.1 million tonnes at 0.889 g/t gold, 7.50 g/t silver, 0.07% lead, and 0.26% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 7.3 million ounces gold, 61.3 million ounces of silver, 402.0 million pounds of lead, and 1.46 billion pounds of zinc. Inferred mineral resource is an additional 60.3 million tonnes at 0.875 g/t gold, 7.90 g/t silver, 0.05% lead, and 0.23% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 1.7 million ounces of gold, 15.3 million ounces of silver, 68.1 million pounds of lead, and 310.8 million pounds of zinc for the inferred mineral resource. Table 1-1 presents a summary of the resource.

 

Table 1-1
Resource Summary

 

Re source Type   NSR Cog
($/t)
    Kt     NSR
($/t)
    Gold
(g/t)
    Silver (g/t)     Lead
(%)
    Zinc
(%)
    Gold
(koz)
    Silver
(koz)
    Lead
(mlb)
    Zinc
(mlb)
 
Leach Resource:                                                                                        
Measured Mineral Resource     5.06       16,147       23.65       0.794       15.44       0.26       0.39       412.1       8,014       92.1       140.6  
Indicated Mineral Resource     5.06       84,692       20.07       0.723       12.15       0.19       0.36       1,969.3       33,076       363.7       674.3  
Meas/Ind Mineral Resource     5.06       100,839       20.64       0.734       12.67       0.21       0.37       2,381.3       41,091       455.8       814.8  
Inferred Mineral Resource     5.06       4,858       18.13       0.772       5.60       0.07       0.24       120.6       874       7.0       25.9  
                                                                                         
Mill Resource:                                                                                        
Measured Mineral Resource     13.72       9,818       39.27       0.864       7.45       0.08       0.28       272.6       2,352       16.4       60.1  
Indicated Mineral Resource     13.72       244251       39.98       0.890       7.50       0.07       0.26       6,992.2       58,934       385.6       1,398.2  
Meas/Ind Mineral Resource     13.72       254,069       39.95       0.889       7.50       0.07       0.26       7,264.8       61,286       402.0       1,458.3  
Inferred Mineral Resource     13.72       60,342       39.04       0.875       7.90       0.05       0.23       1,696.9       15,334       68.1       310.8  
                                                                                         
Total Mineral Re source                                                                                        
Measured Mineral Resource             25,965       29.55       0.820       12.42       0.19       0.35       684.6       10,367       108.5       200.7  
Indicated Mineral Resource             328,943       34.86       0.847       8.70       0.10       0.29       8,961.5       92,010       749.3       2,072.5  
Meas/Ind Mineral Resource             354,908       34.47       0.845       8.97       0.11       0.29       9,646.1       102,377       857.8       2,273.2  
Inferred Mineral Resource             65,200       37.49       0.867       7.73       0.05       0.23       1,817.5       16,208       75.2       336.8  

 

Notes:

(1) The mineral resource is effective as of April 27, 2018.
(2) Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding.
(3) Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
(4) Mineral resources for leach material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold and $20/oz silver.
(5) Mineral resources for mill material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold, $20/oz silver, $1.05/lb lead, and $1.25/lb zinc.
(6) Mineral resources are based on NSR cut-off grades of $5.06/t for leach material and $13.72/t for mill material.
(7) NSR value for leach material is as follows:

Kp Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 30.77 x gold (g/t) + 0.080 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 70% and silver recovery of 13%

Ki Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 25.49 x gold (g/t) + 0.123 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 58% and silver recovery of 20%

Tran-Hi: NSR ($/t) = 26.37 x gold (g/t) + 0.104 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 60% and silver recovery of 17%

Tran-Lo: NSR ($/t) = 21.54 x gold (g/t) + 0.123 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 49% and silver recovery of 20%

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-5

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

(8) NSR value for mill material is 36.75 x gold (g/t) + 0.429 x silver (g/t) + 10.75 x lead (%) + 12.37 x zinc (%), based on recoveries of 86% gold, 76% silver, 60% lead, and 64% zinc.

 

(9) Table 14-2 accompanies this Mineral Resource statement and shows all relevant parameters.

 

(10) The mineral resource estimate assumes that the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto land held by the Adjacent Owner (as defined herein). Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner.

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by Fresnillo PLC (the “Adjacent Owner”) and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner. Delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the PEA, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Orla intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that Orla will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to Orla or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement.

 

1.7 Mining Methods

 

The Camino Rojo mine will be a conventional open pit mine. Mine operations will consist of drilling medium diameter blast holes (approximately 17cm), blasting with either explosive slurries or ANFO (ammonium nitrate/fuel oil) depending on water conditions, and loading into large off-road trucks with hydraulic shovels and wheel loaders.

 

Resource will be delivered to the primary crusher and waste to the waste storage facility southeast of the pit. There will also be a low-grade stockpile facility to store marginal resource for processing at the end of commercial pit operations. There will be a fleet of track dozers, rubber tired dozers, motor graders and water trucks to maintain the working areas of the pit, waste storage areas, and haul roads. The mine is scheduled to operate two 10 hour shifts per day for 365 days per year.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-6

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Due to space limitations there is only one mining phase, the final pit. The final pit design is based on the results of a floating cone analysis using the parameters discussed in the mineral resource estimate.

 

The mine plan is constrained by the Adjacent Owner concession boundary on the north side of the pit. The PEA is based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the PEA.

 

1.8 Recovery Methods

 

Test work results developed by KCA and others have indicated that the Camino Rojo mineral is amenable to heap leaching for the recovery of gold and silver. The material will be mined by standard open pit mining methods and crushed at a rate of 18,000 tpd to 80% passing 38mm (100% passing 66mm) using a two-stage closed crushing circuit and conveyor stacked on the leach pad in 10m lifts. Lime will be added to the material for pH control before being stacked and leached with a dilute sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution will flow by gravity to a pregnant solution pond before being pumped to a Merrill-Crowe plant for metal recovery. Gold and silver will be precipitated from the pregnant solution via zinc cementation. The precious metal precipitate is dewatered using filters, dried in a mercury retort to remove mercury values, and smelted to produce the final doré product.

 

The process has been designed to process 6.57 million tonnes per year at an average processing rate of 18,000 tpd. The project has an estimated mine life of 6.6 years.

 

Electric power will be provided by line power to all elements of the process.

 

An event pond is included to collect contact solution from storm events. Solution collected will be returned to the process as soon as practical.

 

1.9 Infrastructure

 

Existing infrastructure for the Camino Rojo project includes a 20-person exploration camp and dirt and gravel roads throughout the project site. Internet and limited cellular communications are currently available, though these systems will need to be expanded for operations.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-7

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Primary access to the project site is by the paved four-lane Mexican Highway 54 which runs along the project site. An additional 8.4 km of site roads will be constructed to allow access to all project facilities for maintenance, transportation of personnel, deliveries, and hauling of material.

 

Power will be supplied by a 115 kVA overhead power line and distributed at 4160 V. Power will be stepped down as needed to 460 V or 110/220 V. Emergency power will be provided by two diesel-fired generators, which are sized to supply power to the process solution pumping systems and other critical process equipment.

 

Water for operations will be provided by water wells. Average make-up water required is estimated at 112 m3/h.

 

Project buildings will primarily be prefabricated steel buildings or concrete masonry unit buildings and include an administration building, mine truck shop, warehouse, laboratory, guard house, clinic, refinery and MCCs (motor control centers).

 

1.10 Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by the Federal agency of the Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources), known by its acronym SEMARNAT, which has authority over the two principal Federal permits:

 

i. A Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement), known by its acronym as an MIA accompanied by a Estudio de Riesgo (Risk Study, hereafter referred to as ER) and:

 

ii. A Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Used Change) permit, known by its acronym as a CUS, supported by an Estudio Tecnico Justificativo (Technical Justification Study, known by its acronym ETJ).

 

Thus far exploration work at Camino Rojo has been conducted under the auspices of two separate MIA permits and corresponding CUS permits. These permits allow for extensive exploration drilling but are not sufficient for mine construction or operation. In April 2018, Orla hired independent environmental permitting consultants to design and implement baseline environmental studies of the Camino Rojo project, and to work with Orla’s consultant engineers to collect the data required for obtaining a Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement) and Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Use Change) permit.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-8

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The project is not located in an area with any special Federal environmental protection designation and no factors have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required Federal and State environmental permits. Properly prepared MIA and CUS applications and mine operating permits for a project that does not affect federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves can usually be approved in 12 months.

 

In April 2018, Orla commissioned independent consultants to work with Minera Camino Rojo community relations staff to assess social and community impacts of development of the Camino Rojo project. The project has a long association with the local communities, including Community and Social Responsibility Agreements as described in Section 4.3 of this report.

 

1.11 Capital and Operating Costs

 

Capital and operating costs for the process and general administration components of the Camino Rojo project PEA were estimated by KCA. Costs for the mining components were provided by IMC. All costs are presented in first quarter 2018 US dollars. Estimated costs are considered to have an accuracy of +/-25% for capital costs and +/-20% for operating costs.

 

The total capital cost for the Project is US$153.8 million, including US$13.8 million in working capital and not including reclamation and closure costs, IVA (value added tax) or other taxes; all IVA is assumed to be fully refundable. Table 1-2 presents the capital requirements for the Camino Project.

 

Table 1-2
Capital Cost Summary

 

Description   Cost (US$)  
Pre-Production Capital   $ 120,199,000  
Working Capital & Initial Fills   $ 13,789,000  
Mining Contractor Mobilization & Preproduction   $ 4,926,000  
Sustaining Capital – Mine & Process   $ 14,871,000  
Total excluding IVA   $ 153,785,000  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-9

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

All equipment and material requirements are based on the design information described in this report. Budgetary capital costs for process related components have been estimated primarily based on quotes from similar projects in KCA’s database and cost guide data at the time this report was initially completed in June 2018. Where quotes were not available at the time, reasonable cost estimates or allowances were made. All capital cost estimates are based on the purchase of equipment quoted new from the manufacturer or to be fabricated new.

 

The average life of mine operating cost for the Project is US$8.02 per tonne of material processed. Table 1-3 presents the operating cost requirements for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Table 1-3
Operating Cost Summary

 

Description   LOM Cost (US$/t)  
Mine   $ 3.05  
Process & Support Services   $ 3.20  
Site G & A   $ 1.77  
Total   $ 8.02  

 

Mining operating costs have been estimated by IMC and are based on contract mining at US$1.81 per tonne of material moved. Process operating costs have been estimated from first principles. Labor costs were estimated using project specific staffing, salary and wage and benefit requirements. Unit consumptions of materials, supplies, power, water and delivered supply costs were also estimated.

 

The process operating costs presented are based upon the ownership of all process production equipment and site facilities. The owner will employ and direct all operating maintenance and support personnel for all site activities.

 

IVA is not included in the operating costs.

 

1.12 Economic Analysis

 

Based on the estimated production parameters, capital costs, and operating costs, a cash flow model was prepared by KCA for the economic analysis of the Camino Rojo project. The project economics were evaluated using a discounted cash flow (DCF) method, which measures the Net Present Value (NPV) of future cash flow streams.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-10

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The final economic model was developed by KCA, with input from Orla, using the following assumptions:

 

· Period of Analysis of nine years (includes one year of pre-production and investment, seven years of production and one year for reclamation and closure).

 

· Gold price of US$1,250/oz and silver price of US$17/oz.

 

· Processing rate of 18,000 tonnes per day material.

 

· Gold and silver recoveries as discussed in Section 13.0.

 

· Capital and operating costs as developed in Section 21.0.

 

The project economics based on these criteria from the cash flow model are summarized in Table 1-4.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-11

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 1-4
Economic Analysis Summary

 

Economic Analysis          
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pre-Tax     38.1 %    
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax     24.5 %    
Average Annual Cashflow (Pre-Tax)   $ 60     M
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax)   $ 231     M
Average Annual Cashflow (After-Tax)   $ 43     M
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax)   $ 121     M
Gold Price Assumption   $ 1,250     /Ounce
Silver Price Assumption   $ 17     /Ounce
Pay-Back Period (Rears based on After-Tax)     3.3     Years
             
Capital Costs (Excluding IVA)            
Initial Capital   $ 125     M
Working Capital & Initial Fills   $ 14     M
LOM Sustaining Capital   $ 15     M
             
Operating Costs (Average LOM)            
Mining   $ 3.05     /Tonne processed
Processing & Support   $ 3.20     /Tonne processed
G&A   $ 1.77     /Tonne processed
Total Operating Cost   $ 8.02     /Tonne processed
Total By-Product Cash Cost   $ 499     /Ounce Au
All-in Sustaining Cost   $ 555     /Ounce Au
             
Production Data            
Life of Mine     6.6     Years
Total Tonnes to Crusher     42,477,000     Tonnes
Grade Au (Avg.)     0.71     g/t
Grade Ag (Avg.)     13.56     g/t
Contained Au oz     966,000     Ounces
Contained Ag oz     18,517,000     Ounces
Mine Throughput per day     18,000     Tonnes/day
Mine Throughput per year     6,570,000     Tonnes/year
Metallurgical Recovery Au (Overall)     67 %    
Metallurgical Recovery Ag (Overall)     15 %    
Average Annual Gold Production     97,472     Ounces
Average Annual Silver Production     415,981     Ounces
Total Gold Produced     642,382     Ounces
Total Silver Produced     2,741,485     Ounces
LOM Strip Ratio     0.58:1      

 

A sensitivity analysis was performed on the project economics. Figure 1-1 and Figure 1-2 are charts showing the relative sensitivity to a number of parameters.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-12

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 1-1
After-Tax IRR vs. Gold Price, Capital Cost, and Operating Cost

 

 

Figure 1-2
NPV @ 5% vs. Gold Price, Capital Cost, and Operating Cost

 

1.13 Interpretations and Conclusions

 

1.13.1 Conclusions

 

The work that has been completed to date has demonstrated that Camino Rojo is potentially a technically and economically viable project and justifies additional work, including a pre-feasibility or feasibility study.

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-13

 

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The project has been designed as an open-pit mine with heap leach for recovery of gold and silver from oxide and transition material with a life of mine production of 42.5 million tonnes with an average grade of 0.71 g/t Au and 13.6 g/t Ag. Metallurgical test work on the material to date shows acceptable recoveries for gold and silver with low to moderate reagent consumptions. Cement agglomeration does not appear to be required.

 

Leachable material will be crushed to P80 38mm, stockpiled, reclaimed and conveyor stacked onto the heap leach pad at an average rate of 18,000 tpd. Stacked material will be leached using low grade sodium cyanide solution and the resulting pregnant leach solution will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe plant for the recovery of gold and silver by zinc cementation.

 

1.13.2 Opportunities

 

Key opportunities for the Camino Rojo project include:

 

· Based on test work to date, metal recoveries are relatively insensitive to crush size and the same results may be achievable at coarser material sizes, which would result in lower capital and operating costs.

 

· If an agreement can be achieved with the owner of the adjoining claim, there would be an increase in the amount of material that could potentially be mined and processed with the same general mine and process plan as the PEA is based upon. This would be positive for the project economics.

 

1.13.3 Risks

 

Risks for the Camino Rojo project include:

 

· Camino Rojo considers contract mining. There is a risk that the selected mining contractor may require financial assistance from the owner, which may increase costs.

 

· Metallurgical results for the Camino Rojo project are based on information and data that have been extrapolated from results from historical test work and are speculative due to lack of direct confirmatory test work. There is a risk that the results may be overstated.

 

· Carbonaceous material with preg-robbing characteristics has been identified, which may reduce overall heap performance and metal recovery if processed.

 

· Additional studies on the proposed power line to site, including approval from the Mexican CFE, is required to confirm the proposed power line is feasible. Based on the results of these studies, an alternative power supply method may be required which may increase project costs.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-14

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

1.14 Recommendations

 

Based on the results of the PEA, KCA and IMC recommend the following additional work:

 

· The project should proceed to the prefeasibility or feasibility study level;

 

· Additional studies and cost estimates for delivery of line power to the project site should be completed;

 

· Confirmatory metallurgical test work should be completed on representative samples for each mineral type, specifically column leach tests on coarse crushed material;

 

· Perform geotechnical and hydrogeological studies at the proposed heap, pit and processing areas;

 

RGI recommends drilling an additional 5,000m to further evaluate the known sulphide resource, and implementation of an exploration program, including 7,500m of drilling, to seek additional resources within the project concessions.

 

The total estimated cost to complete the recommended work is US$7.5 million.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 1-15

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

2.0 INTRODUCTION

 

2.1 Introduction and Overview

 

This Technical Report is issued to Orla Mining Ltd. (Orla). Orla is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (TSX VENTURE: OLA) and holds a 100% interest in the Camino Rojo deposit through its Mexican subsidiary Minera Camino Rojo S.A. de C.V (MCR). This report was prepared by Kappes, Cassiday and Associates (KCA), Resource Geosciences Incorporated (RGI) and Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. (IMC).

 

This Technical Report was amended on March 11, 2019 to address certain comments from the British Columbia Securities Commission in connection with Orla’s filing of a preliminary base shelf prospectus. There has been no change to the Mineral Resource estimate or the PEA (as defined below)

 

The purposes of this Technical Report are as follows:

 

  · Develop an NI 43-101 compliant Mineral Resource for the Camino Rojo deposit,

  · Present the results of a Preliminary Economic Analysis (PEA) for the implementation of open pit mining and heap leaching to recover the gold and silver mineralization, and

  · Propose additional work required for Preliminary Feasibility or Feasibility level studies.

 

The project considers open pit mining of approximately 42.5 million tonnes of material with an estimated grade of 0.71 g/t gold and 13.6 g/t silver. Material from the pit will be crushed to 80% passing 38mm (100% passing 66mm), conveyor stacked onto a heap leach pad and leached using a low concentration sodium cyanide solution. Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe recovery plant where gold and silver will be precipitated from deaerated pregnant solution with zinc dust. The resulting precious metal sludge will be filtered and dried in a mercury retort to produce the final doré product.

 

The average processing throughput for the Camino Rojo project is 18,000 tonnes of material per day and will be developed in two stages with expansion of the leach pad and addition of conveying equipment occurring in Year 2 of operation. The scope of this study includes development of a preliminary mine production schedule, as well as preliminary-level costing for all process components and infrastructure required for the operation.

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 2-1

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

This study considers the potential viability of mineral resources for the proposed development option and includes:

 

  · a mineral resource estimate;

  · historical exploration work, description of the property, geology and nature of mineralization;

  · new mining studies;

  · evaluations of processing options and plant throughputs;

  · analysis of infrastructure and logistic strategies;

  · new costing studies; and

  · a preliminary economic model based upon the results of those studies.

 

The property description, including reporting on historical exploration work, geology and mineralization, environmental review and assessment of regulatory requirements and adjacent properties have previously been published by RGI by Matthew Gray in a report with a 13 January 2018 effective date titled, “CSA NI43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Project, Municipio of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico.” (the January Report). The report was written in compliance with disclosure and reporting requirements set forth in National Instrument “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” (NI 43-101).

 

This Technical Report supersedes the January Report.

 

2.2 Project Scope and Terms of Reference

 

2.2.1 Scope of Work

 

The purpose of this Technical Report is to provide a mineral resource estimate for the Camino Rojo deposit and a preliminary economic analysis of a conceptual mining and processing project treating the oxide and transition materials detailed in the mineral resource estimate.

 

KCA’s scope of work for the project is summarized as follows:

 

  · Review of historical metallurgical tests and interpretation,

  · Plant design and recovery methods,

  · Infrastructure design

  · Infrastructure process capital and operating costs,

  · Economic analysis, and

  · Overall report preparation and compilation.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 2-2

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

IMC’s scope of work for the project is summarized as follows:

 

  · Audit the drillhole database for the Camino Rojo deposit,

  · Develop the mineral resource block model for the deposit,

  · Estimate NI 43-101 compliant mineral resource,

  · Develop an operational mine plan for the open pit, and

  · Estimate mine equipment requirements, mine capital costs, mine operating costs, and contract mining costs for the project.

 

RGI’s scope of the work for the project is summarized as follows:

 

  · Create a property description, including reporting on historical exploration work, geology and mineralization, environmental liabilities, location, access, physiography, infrastructure, claim ownership, and surface rights ownership,

  · Assessment of regulatory requirements and description of the steps required to obtain construction and operating permits for the mine plan described in this report,

  · Assess risks to project development related to access, title, permits, and security.

 

The scope of this report also includes a study of information obtained from public documents; other literature sources cited; review of historical metallurgical tests and programs conducted to date; cost information from public documents and recent estimates from previous studies conducted by KCA.

 

This PEA is intended to provide the project’s preliminary economics and to give guidance for the implementation of the Camino Rojo project.

 

2.2.2 Terms of Reference

 

The units of measure presented in this report, unless noted otherwise, are in the metric system. The currency used for all costs is presented in US dollars (US$), unless specified otherwise. The costs were estimated based on quotes and cost data as of 1st quarter 2018.

 

The economic evaluation of the Project has been conducted on a constant dollar basis (Q1 2018) with a gold price of US$1,250/oz and a silver price of US$17/oz for the Base Case. Economic evaluation is done on a Project-basis and from the point of view of a private investor, after deductions for royalties, income taxes, and various mining taxes and duties paid to the government of Mexico. An exchange ratio of 18 pesos = 1.00 US$ was used for any costs converted from Mexican currency.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 2-3

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

2.3 Sources of Information

 

The primary sources of information used for this study include:

 

  · The digital drillhole database. This was developed during the Canplats and Goldcorp tenure.

  · The original assay certificates for the holes.

  · Various geologic solids that were developed (interpreted) by Orla geologists.

  · Various reports, including previous technical reports, on sampling methodology, quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC), resource modeling, geotechnical and slope stability, mine planning, and economic evaluations. These were developed by Canplats, Goldcorp, and various consultants.

  · Various reports on metallurgical testing, process recovery, and mineral processing that were developed by Canplats, Goldcorp, and other consultants.

  · Published reports on Mexican taxes and duties.

 

KCA, IMC, and RGI reviewed the data and only used data that were deemed reliable for this report.

 

2.4 Qualified Persons and Site Visits

 

Table 2-1 shows QP’s responsible for each section of this Technical Report.

 

The new processing studies, cost estimations, and financial analysis and review of historical metallurgical data were conducted by KCA under the auspices of Carl Defilippi, of Reno, NV. Mr. Defilippi is an independent qualified person under NI 43-101, and last visited the site on 20 and 21 of February 2018.

 

Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G, the Qualified Person responsible for Sections 4 through 9, Section 20 and Section 23 of this report, conducted field visits to the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Zacatecas, Mexico, during the period 12 to 13 December 2016 as part of Orla’s due diligence review of the project, which at the time was owned and operated by Goldcorp, and visited again during the period 19 to 22 February 2018.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 2-4

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Prior to the field visit and data review conducted for the purposes of this Technical Report, Dr. Gray had been directly involved in mineral exploration programs in the region but had not conducted examinations of the Camino Rojo project.

 

Michael G. Hester, Vice President and Principal Mining Engineer for IMC, is an independent Qualified Person. Mr. Hester is responsible for the mineral resource estimate, the mine plan used for the PEA study, and the mine capital and operating cost estimates. Mr. Hester visited the site on 20 and 21 February 2018 for two days.

 

There is no affiliation between Mr. Defilippi, Dr. Gray and Mr. Hester and Orla except that of an independent consultant / client relationship and each author is considered to be independent of Orla as described in Section 1.5 of NI 43-101.

 

The effective date of the mineral resource is April 27, 2018. The effective date of this PEA is June 19, 2018.

 

2.5 Forward Looking Information

 

The results of the PEA, and the mineral resource estimates represent forward-looking information that is subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those presented here. Forward-looking statements in this technical report include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to future metal prices, exchange rates; taxation; smelter and refinery terms; assumed mining and metallurgical recovery factors; net present value; internal rate of return; sensitivities on parameters; the estimation of mineral resources; the realization of estimates; the timing and amount of estimated future production, costs of production; capital expenditures; operating costs; technological changes to the mining, processing and waste disposal activities outlined; permitting time lines; requirements for additional capital; government regulation of mining operations; environmental risks; ability to retain social license for operations; unanticipated reclamation expenses; title disputes or claims; upside opportunities, pit wall angles, larger crush size and increase in the recoveries; ability to reach agreement with the Adjacent Owner; and limitations on insurance coverage.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 2-5

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions on the date the statements are made. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this report. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of preliminary economic assessments, drill results and the estimation of mineral resources, including changes in the economic parameters; changes in Project parameters as mine, process and closure plans continue to be refined, possible variations in mineral resources, grade, dilution, or recovery rates; geotechnical and hydrogeological considerations during mining; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; shipping delays and regulations; accidents, labor disputes and other risks of the mining industry; and delays in obtaining governmental approvals; risks relating to not securing agreements with third parties or not receiving required permits.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 2-6

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 2-1
Table of Responsibilities by Section

 

Section Section Title QP
1 Summary All
2 Introduction C. Defilippi, KCA
3 Reliance on Other Experts C. Defilippi, KCA
4 Property Description and Location M. Gray, RGI
5 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography M. Gray, RGI
6 History M. Gray, RGI
7 Geological Setting and Mineralization M. Gray, RGI
8 Deposit Types M. Gray, RGI
9 Exploration M. Gray, RGI
10 Drilling M. Hester, IMC
11 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security M. Hester, IMC
12 Data Verification M. Hester, IMC
13 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing C. Defilippi, KCA
14 Mineral Resource Estimates M. Hester, IMC
15 Mineral Reserve Estimates N/A
16 Mining Methods M. Hester, IMC
17 Recovery Methods C. Defilippi, KCA
18 Project Infrastructure C. Defilippi, KCA
19 Market Studies and Contracts C. Defilippi, KCA
20 Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact M. Gray, RGI
21 Capital and Operating Costs C. Defilippi (KCA) / M. Hester (IMC)
22 Economic Analyses C. Defilippi, KCA
23 Adjacent Properties M. Gray, RGI
24 Other Relevant Data and Information All
25 Interpretation and Conclusions All
26 Recommendations All
27 References All

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 2-7

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

2.6 Frequently Used Acronyms, Abbreviations, Definitions and Units of Measure

 

All costs are presented in United States dollars. Units of measurement are metric. Only common and standard abbreviations were used wherever possible. A list of abbreviations used is as follows:

 

Distances: mm – millimeter
  cm – centimeter
  m – meter
  km – kilometer
  mbgl – meters below ground level
Areas: m2 or sqm – square meter
  ha – hectare
  km2 – square kilometer
Weights: oz – troy ounces
  Koz – 1,000 troy ounces
  mlb – million pounds (imperial)
  g – grams
  kg – kilograms
  T or t – tonne (1000 kg)
  Kt – 1,000 tonnes
  Mt – 1,000,000 tonnes
Time: min – minute
  h or hr – hour
  op hr – operating hour
  d – day
  yr – year
  Ma – Mega-annum (one million years)
Volume/Flow: m3 or cu m – cubic meter
  m3/h – cubic meters per hour
  L/s – liters per second
Assay/Grade: g/t – grams per tonne
  g Au/t – grams gold per tonne
  g Ag/t – grams silver per tonne
  g Cu/t – grams copper per tonne
  ppm – parts per million

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 2-8

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  ppb – parts per billion
Other: TPD or tpd – metric tonnes per day
  ktpy – 1000 tonnes per year
  m3/h/m2 – cubic meters per hour per square meter
  Lph/m2 – liters per hour per square meter
  L/s/km2 – liters per second per square kilometers
  g/L – grams per liter
  kph – kilometers per hour
  Ag – silver
  Au – gold
  Hg – mercury
  US$ or $ – United States dollar
  MXN – Mexican Peso
  NaCN – sodium cyanide
  TSS – total suspended solids
  TDS – total dissolved solids
  RAB – rotary air blast
  RC – reverse circulation
  TEM – transient electromagnetic
  DDH – diamond drill boreholes
  LOM – Life of Mine
  kWh – Kilowatt-hours
  kN – Kilonewton
  P80 – 80% passing

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 2-9

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS

 

KCA, RGI and IMC have taken all reasonable care in producing the information contained in this report. The information, conclusions and estimates contained in this report are consistent with the industry best practice guidelines, based on information available at the time of preparation and assumptions, conditions and qualifications set forth in this report.

 

The authors of this Technical Report are not experts in Mexican legal or environmental matters. Accordingly, for certain information pertaining solely to legal and environmental matters contained in Sections 4.2, 4.3, 4.5 and 4.6 the authors have relied upon:

 

· Mining concession title opinion provided by Lic. Mauricio Heiras, Mexican legal counsel for Orla on 28 June 2017 (Heiras, 2017) and in a report dated 6 January 2018 (Heiras, 2018).

 

· Land access agreement summaries provided by Lic. Mauricio Heiras, Mexican legal counsel for Orla in a report dated 28 June 2017 (Heiras, 2017) and a report dated 6 January 2018 (Heiras, 2018).

 

· Environmental permitting information contained in a report prepared by Lic. Mauricio Heiras, Mexican legal counsel for Orla, dated 28 June 2017 (Heiras, 2017) and a public domain Federal report (CONANP, 2014).

 

KCA, RGI and IMC have taken appropriate steps in their professional judgment to confirm that all information outlined above as having been supplied by non-Qualified Persons to prepare this Technical Report is reliable, but it must be recognized that the authors are relying on the accuracy of the above noted opinions.

 

All reports, publications, exhibits, documentation, conclusions, and other work products obtained or developed by KCA, RGI and IMC during completion of this Technical Report shall be and remain the property of KCA, RGI and IMC.

 

This Technical Report was prepared specifically for the purpose of complying with NI 43-101 and may be distributed to third parties and published without prior consent of the Authors if the Technical Report is presented in its entirety without omissions or modifications, subject to the regulations of NI 43-101.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 3-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

 

4.1 Area and Location

 

The Camino Rojo project is located in the Municipality of Mazapil, State of Zacatecas, Mexico near the village of San Tiburcio. The project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas, 48 km S-SW of the town of Concepcion del Oro, and 54 km S-SE of Goldcorp’s Peñasquito Mine (Figure 4-1). The project area is centered at approximately 244150E 2675900N UTM NAD27 Zone 14N.

 

All geographic references in this report utilize UTM Zone 14N datum NAD27 unless otherwise stated.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-1

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 4-1
Location Map, Camino Rojo Project

 

4.2 Claims and Title

 

The author is not an expert in Mexican mining law. The author has relied upon Orla’s legal counsel in Mexico, Lic. Mauricio Heiras of Chihuahua, Chihuahua for a review of the concession titles and legal framework, as shown in Table 4-1. Lic. Heiras verified that the concessions are in good standing and ownership of all eight concessions has been registered to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, (Heiras, 2017), (Heiras, 2018).

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-2

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

All minerals rights in Mexico are the property of the government of Mexico and may be exploited by private entities under concessions granted by the Mexican federal government. The process was defined under the Mexican Mining Law of 1992 and excludes petroleum and nuclear resources from consideration. The Mining Law also requires that non-Mexican entities must either establish a Mexican corporation, or partner with a Mexican entity.

 

Under current Mexican mining law, amended 29 April 2005, the Direccion General de Minas (‘DGM’) grants concessions for a period of 50 years, provided the concession is maintained in good standing. There is no distinction between mineral exploration and exploitation concessions. As part of the requirements to maintain a concession in good standing, bi-annual fees must be paid based upon a per-hectare escalating fee, work expenditures must be incurred in amounts determined on the basis of concession size and age, and applicable environmental regulations must be respected.

 

The northern edge of the Camino Rojo deposit identified in this technical report extends onto mining concessions controlled by the Adjacent Owner that are not part of the project holdings. Drillpads and drillroads have been observed on the Adjacent Owner’s concessions and the Adjacent Owner has a publicly available resource with respect to the adjacent mining concessions. However, all interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report relate exclusively to the mining concessions that comprise the Camino Rojo project.

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by the Adjacent Owner and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner.

 

The PEA is based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the PEA. However, delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the PEA, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Orla intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that Orla will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to Orla or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-3

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The Camino Rojo project consists of eight concessions covering in aggregate 205,936.867 Has. The Los Cardos concession was originally staked and titled to Explominerals SA de CV whereas all other concessions were staked and titled to Canplats de Mexico SA de CV, whose legal name was subsequently changed to Camino Rojo SA de CV. The concession rights of Explominerals were transferred to Camino Rojo SA de CV. Camino Rojo SA de CV subsequently ceded all mining claims to Minera Peñasquito SA de CV, who in turn sold the mining claims to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, a subsidiary of Orla.

 

Concession information is summarized in Table 4-1, and the concessions are shown in Figure 4-2.

 

Table 4-1
Listing of Mining Concessions

 

        Validity   Area
Concession Name   File Number
(Expediente)
  Title
Number
  Title Issued
Date
  Expiration
Date
  Has.
Camino Rojo   093/28336   230914   06/11/2007   05/11/2057   8,340.7905
Camino Rojo 1   093/28349   231922   16/05/2008   15/05/2058   88,897.3255
Camino Rojo 1 Frac. A   093/28349   231923   16/05/2008   15/05/2058   96.8888
Camino Rojo 3   093/28425   232014   03/06/2008   02/06/2058   30,050.0000
Camino Rojo 2   093/28417   232076   10/06/2008   09/06/2058   17,847.4398
Camino Rojo 4   093/28465   232644   02/10/2008   01/10/2058   9,701.0000
Camino Rojo 5   093/28534   232647   02/10/2008   01/10/2058   33,018.4718
Los Cardos   093/28561   232652   02/10/2008   01/10/2058   17,984.9513

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-4

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 4-2
Mining Concessions, Camino Rojo Project

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-5

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The legal standing of these claims and the ownership of surface rights have not been verified by Dr. Gray or RGI. Prior to entering into purchase option agreements for the concessions, Orla requested a title opinion for the concessions from Orla’s legal counsel in Mexico, Lic. Mauricio Heiras of Chihuahua, Chihuahua, who investigated the concession status and reported that the claims were valid.

 

4.2.1 Orla Control of Mining Concessions via Acquisition from Minera Peñasquito SA de CV

 

The claims are controlled by Orla by means of its ownership of Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, which acquired the concessions from Goldcorp’s Mexican subsidiary, Minera Peñasquito SA de CV. A summary of Orla’s and Goldcorp’s rights and obligations under the terms of the acquisition agreement is as follows:

 

· Goldcorp was granted a 2% NSR on all metal production from the project, except for metals produced under the sulphide joint venture option stipulated in the acquisition agreement.

 

· Orla is the operator of the Camino Rojo project and has full rights to explore, evaluate, and exploit the property.

 

· In the event that a sulphide project is defined through a positive Pre-Feasibility Study outlining one of the development scenarios a) or b) contained herein, Goldcorp may, at its option, enter into a joint venture for the purpose of future exploration, advancement, construction, and exploitation of the sulphide project.

 

o Scenario a): A sulphide project where material from Camino Rojo is processed using the existing infrastructure of the Peñasquito Mine, Mill and Concentrator facilities. In such circumstances, the sulphide project would be operated by Goldcorp, who would earn a 70% interest in the sulphide project, with Orla owning 30%.

 

o Scenario b): A standalone sulphide project with a mine plan containing at least 500 million tonnes of Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves using standalone facilities not associated with Peñasquito. Under this scenario, the sulphide project would be operated by Goldcorp, who would earn a 60% interest in the sulphide project, with Orla owning 40%.

 

· Following exercise of its option, if Goldcorp elects to sell its portion of the sulphide project, in whole or in part, the Orla would retain a right of first refusal on the sale of the sulphide project.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-6

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

· For as long as Goldcorp maintains ownership of at least 10% of Orla common shares, Goldcorp has the right to nominate one director to the board of Orla and to participate in all future equity offerings to maintain its prorated ownership.

 

· Orla will retain a right of first refusal on Goldcorp’s NSR, Goldcorp’s portion of the sulphide project, following the exercise of its option, and certain claims retained by Goldcorp.

 

· Carry forward of assessment work credits will be applied to the Camino Rojo project concessions thus no expenditures are immediately required to meet assessment work requirements

 

4.3 Surface Rights

 

The author is not an expert in Mexican surface rights or contract law. The author has relied upon Orla’s legal counsel in Mexico, Lic. Mauricio Heiras of Chihuahua, Chihuahua for a review of the project surface rights (Heiras, 2017), (Heiras, 2018) as discussed in Section 3.0 of this report.

 

Surface rights in the project area are owned by several Ejidos, which are federally defined agrarian communities. The land which includes the resource at Camino Rojo is controlled by the San Tiburcio Ejido, comprised of 400 voting members who collectively control 37,154 Has. The legal ownership of surface rights has not been verified by Dr. Gray or RGI, and the information contained herein comes from summary reports prepared by Orla’s legal counsel in Mexico, Lic. Mauricio Heiras.

 

Areas for which Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV controls surface rights include both areas with and without mineral rights, with the latter being maintained for possible infrastructure purposes. Surface rights controlled are shown in Figure 4-3.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-7

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 4-3
Surface Rights in Project Area

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-8

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Exploration work at the project has been carried out under the terms of surface access agreements negotiated with the Ejido and executed on 26 February 2013. Camino Rojo SA de CV (a Goldcorp subsidiary) executed three agreements with the Ejido that cover the Camino Rojo resource. Camino Rojo SA de CV subsequently passed the rights and obligations of these agreements to Minera Peñasquito SA de CV (a Goldcorp subsidiary), who subsequently transferred the rights and obligations to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV. The three agreements are:

 

1. Previous to Expropriation Occupation Agreement (COPE), executed on 26 February 2013 by and between Camino Rojo SA de CV, in its position of “occupant”, and Ejido San Tiburcio, as the owner, with regards to a surface of 2,497.30 Has. This agreement stipulates that the Ejido expressly and voluntarily accepts the expropriation of Ejido lands by Camino Rojo SA de CV, in effect converting the Ejido land to fee simple private land titled to Camino Rojo SA de CV. In the event that the Federal agency responsible for the expropriation process, the Secretario de Desarollo Agrario Territorial y Urbano, denies the petition to cede the Ejido lands to Camino Rojo SA de CV, the agreement automatically converts to a 30-year temporary occupation agreement, extendable for another 30-year period of requested by the Company. Payment in full was made at the date of signing and no further payments are due. This agreement is valid and expires in 2043 and covers the area of the mineral resource discussed in this report.

 

2. Temporary Occupation Agreement (COT), executed on 26 February 2013 by and between Camino Rojo SA de CV, in its position of occupant, and Ejido San Tiburcio, as owner, with regards to a surface of 2,500 Has (the “TOA”). This agreement allows Camino Rojo SA de CV to explore 2,500 Has of Ejido lands over a 5-year period, while the expropriation process is executed. Payment in full was made at the date of signing and no further payments are due. This agreement expired in February 2018 and Minera Camino Rojo is currently negotiating with Ejido San Tiburcio a new COT.

 

3. Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement (CSRA), executed on 26 February 2013 by and between Camino Rojo SA de CV, in its position of “collaborator”, and Ejido San Tiburcio, as “beneficiary”, with regards to certain social contributions to be provided in favor of this last CSRA. The agreement stipulates that Camino Rojo SA de CV will contribute $10,000,000 Pesos annually to the Ejido to be used to promote and execute diverse social and economic development programs to benefit the Ejido. Additionally, at its discretion, Camino Rojo SA de CV will provide support for adult education, career training, business development assistance, and cultural programs, and scholastic scholarships. The agreement expires when exploration or exploitation activities at the Camino Rojo project end. Annual payments are due on the 29th of June each year. This agreement is valid and remains in effect until mine closure or project cancellation.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-9

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Camino Rojo SA de CV executed a surface rights agreement with Ejido Francisco de los Quijano. This agreement, executed on 22 December 2014, is a Temporary Occupation Agreement (COT) that allows Camino Rojo SA de CV to conduct exploration activities on 7,666 Has, as shown in Figure 4-3. The agreement expires on 21 December 2019. Annual payments of $9,134,749 Pesos are required to keep the agreement in good standing. Simultaneously with the execution of the COT, Camino Rojo SA de CV executed a Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement with the Ejido which obligates Camino Rojo SA de CV to: provide $19,000 Pesos in monthly scholastic scholarships to the Ejido; complete electrification of an Ejido water well and rehabilitate/reconstruct the community cistern; assist Ejido members with finding appropriate employment opportunities with Camino Rojo SA de CV and its contractors; and to provide basic food rations to community members in need. The CSRA expires on 21 December 2019.

 

Camino Rojo executed a surface rights agreements with Ejido El Berrendo. This agreement, executed on 22 December 2014 was a Temporary Occupation Agreement (COT) that allowed Camino Rojo SA de CV to conduct exploration activities on 4,201 Has, as shown in Figure 4-3. Annual payments of $4,467,530 Pesos were required to keep the agreement in good standing. The COT agreement expired on 21 December 2017. Minera Camino Rojo is currently negotiating a new COT agreement with the Ejido.

 

Simultaneously with the execution of the 2014 COT agreement, Camino Rojo SA de CV executed a Collaboration and Social Responsibility Agreement with the Ejido El Berrendo which obligated Camino Rojo SA de CV to: provide $26,000 Pesos in monthly scholastic scholarships to the Ejido; complete electrification of the Ejido community building; rehabilitate Ejido roads; provide materials needed for construction of a community health center and water well; rehabilitate/reconstruct the community cistern; assist Ejido members with finding appropriate employment opportunities with Camino Rojo SA de CV and its contractors; and to provide basic food rations to community members in need. The CSRA expired on 21 December 2017. Minera Camino Rojo is currently negotiating a new CSRA agreement with the Ejido.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-10

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

4.4 Environmental Liability

 

No environmental liabilities are apparent. The property does not contain active or historic mines or prospects, there are no plant facilities present within the project area, nor are tailings piles present, and all exploration work has been carried out by prior operators in accordance with Mexican environmental standards.

 

4.5 Permits

 

The author is not an expert in Mexican environmental law. The author has relied upon Orla’s legal counsel in Mexico, Lic. Mauricio Heiras of Chihuahua, Chihuahua for a summary review of the project environmental permits (Heiras, Legal opinion letter, 2017) and a public domain Federal report (CONANP, 2014) for a review of permitting risks discussed in this report.

 

The Ley de Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable (Sustainable Development Forest Law) and the Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y Protección al Ambiente (General Law of Ecologic Equilibrium and Environmental Protection) regulate all direct exploration activities carried out at Camino Rojo (reverse circulation drilling, core drilling, trenching, road construction, etc.). Surface disturbances caused by exploration activities require a Cambio de Uso de Suelo (CUS, Land Use Change) authorization and approval of an Environmental Impact Assessment (MIA).

 

The National Water Law regulates all water use in Mexico under the responsibility of Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA). Applications are submitted to CONAGUA indicating the annual water needs for mining activities and the source of water to be used. CONAGUA grants water concessions according to stipulated water availability in the source area.

 

Current exploration work at the project is being conducted under the approval of two MIA and CUS permits.

 

Construction and operation of a mine at Camino Rojo will require various Federal, State, and Municipal permits as discussed in Section 20.2 of this report.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-11

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

4.6 Access, Title, Permit and Security Risks

 

4.6.1 Access Risks

 

The project has had a productive relationship with the surface owners and no extraordinary risks to project access were discerned. A valid surface access agreement allows Orla, through its Mexican subsidiary Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV, to explore and develop the project modelled for the PEA base case described herein.

 

4.6.2 Title Risks

 

Prior operators have met legal requirements to maintain in good standing mining concession titles. Conditional upon continued compliance with annual requirements, no risk to validity of title was discerned.

 

4.6.3 Permit Risks

 

Prior operators have been compliant with Mexican environmental regulations and conditional upon continued compliance, permits for normal exploration activities are expected to be readily attainable.

 

The chief project risk identified by previous operators is that of a possible Federal designation of a protected biological-ecological reserve that could affect the project. SEMARNAT published a public notice in the Official Gazette of the Federation requesting public consultation and comments on the possible designation of an area known as “Zacatecas Semiarid Desert” as a Natural Protected Area (ANP). If a designation of this ANP by the government includes the surface of the mining concession areas or ancillary work areas such as possible water well fields of Camino Rojo, this could limit the growth and continuity of the project.

 

The proposed area for designation is located in the Municipalities of General Francisco Murguía, Villa de Cos, El Salvador, Melchor Ocampo, Concepción de Oro and Mazapil, in the State of Zacatecas (CONANP, 2014).

 

ANPs are generally divided into sub-zones in which the execution of different activities are allowed or prohibited in accordance with the sub-zone's characteristics. “Core zones” are established with the objective of preserving the present ecosystems in the long term and may be controlled through designation of restricted use or through special protections.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 4-12

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

“Buffer zones” are intended to regulate exploitation activities under a sustainable development scheme through different uses such as human settlement or sustainable natural resources exploitation (the ANPs may include other sub-zones for different land uses, agricultural, recreational, restoration, among others).

 

Mining activities (including both exploration and exploitation), depending on the corresponding sub-zone may be carried out provided they are authorized by CONANP (National Commission on Protected Natural Areas), without prejudice of other authorizations required for their execution.

 

Goldcorp, the prior operator of the project, engaged in forums with government and community stakeholders, and submitted an official opinion regarding this ANP declaration to the government, with the objective of ensuring that if an ANP was created, the Camino Rojo project would not be restricted from development. Since the time that the idea of creating an ANP was first proposed there has been no formal movement on the proposal. The State government has opposed the declaration of an ANP in the region.

 

4.6.4 Security Risks

 

Drug related violence, propagated by members of criminal cartels and directed against other members of criminal cartels, has occurred in the region and has affected local communities. The aggression is not directed at mining companies operating in the region and has not affected the ability of Orla or previous operators to explore the Camino Rojo project.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 4-13

 

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

  

5.1 Accessibility

 

The property is dominantly situated along a wide, flat valley near the town of San Tiburcio. San Tiburcio is situated on Mexican highway 54, a well-maintained, paved highway linking the major city of Zacatecas in Zacatecas State with Saltillo in Coahuila State (Figure 5-1). The project lies 190 km NE of the city of Zacatecas. Both of these cities have airports with regularly scheduled flights south to Mexico City or north to the U.S.A.

 

There are numerous gravel roads within the property linking the surrounding countryside with the two highways, Highways 54 and 62, which transect the property. There are very few locations within the property that are not readily accessible by four-wheel drive vehicles.

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 5-1

 

    

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

     

  

Figure 5-1
Project Location and Regional Infrastructure

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 5-2

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

5.2 Physiography, Climate and Vegetation

 

The broad valley around San Tiburcio is bounded to the north by the low rolling hills of Sierra La Arracada and Sierra El Barros, to the east by Sierra La Cucaracha, and to the south by the Sierra Los Colgados. The terrain is generally flat. Bedrock exposures are rare, limited to road cuts, borrow pits or creek beds. The elevations within the property range from approximately 1,850m to 2,460m AMSL and relief is low.

 

The climate is typical of the high altitude Mesa Central, dry and semi-arid. Annual precipitation for the area is approximately 337mm, mostly during the rainy season in June and July. Temperatures commonly range from +30o to 20oC in the summer and 15o to 0o C in the winter. Exploration and production activities can be conducted year-round.

 

The vegetation is dominantly scrub bushes with cacti, maguey, sage and coarse grasses with rare yucca (Figure 5-2). The natural grasses are used to locally graze domestic livestock. Wild fauna is not abundant but several varieties of birds, rabbits, coyote, lizards, snakes and deer reportedly inhabit the area.

 

 

Figure 5-2
View of Typical Topography and Vegetation at Camino Rojo

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 5-3

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

5.3 Local Resources and Infrastructure

 

There is a good network of road and rail services in the region. Road access to most of the property is possible via numerous gravel roads from both Highways 54 and 62. In addition, there is a railway approximately 40 km east of San Tiburcio that crosses both highways (Figure 5-1). There is a high voltage power line transecting the property near San Tiburcio. However, preliminary indications are that a connection may not be possible close to site and power will have to be brought from a switching yard 70 km away because the current local grid does not have sufficient capacity to meet the power demands for the project.

   

The project site is generally flat with adequate space for any future development of mining and processing facilities. Surface rights over the PEA base case project area are subject to a Previous to Expropriation Occupation Agreement (COPE), as described in Section 3.0. This agreement provides the surface rights required to develop the project, including access from the adjoining highway.

 

Prior operators purchased ground water from owners of local wells and trucked the water to site for drilling needs. On 24 February 2015 Camino Rojo SA de CV acquired subsurface water rights totalling 9,695,900 cubic meters per annum for industrial use. These water rights were subsequently transferred to Minera Peñasquito SA de CV and then assigned to Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV. Registration of the water rights titles in the name of Minera Camino Rojo SA de CV is in process with the Federal water authority (CONAGUA). The water rights acquired by Minera Camino Rojo grant permission to construct and extract water from 26 wells in the project area. Thus far, four water wells have been constructed for testing purposes. Pump testing of these wells was conducted by prior operators of the project. Pump test results from well CR-01 were indicative that significant water production is feasible from structural zones within the Caracol Formation. Orla’s hydrogeologic consultants believe that the most prospective targets for water production for the project are structural zones with significant secondary permeability developed in the Caracol Formation (Hawkins, 2018). Orla believes it will be possible and practical to develop a subsurface water supply for the project, and in April 2018, Orla initiated a review of existing groundwater information and tested the wells completed to date in order to develop a program of water well exploration, construction, and testing, to define a water supply adequate for project development.

 

Most exploration supplies may be purchased in the nearby historic mining cities of Zacatecas, Fresnillo and Saltillo. Experienced mining personnel are available locally and from nearby mining towns of Concepciòn del Oro and Mazapil.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 5-4

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

6.0 HISTORY

  

6.1 Prior Ownership

 

The mining concessions comprising the Camino Rojo project were originally staked to the benefit of Canplats Mexico, a subsidiary of Canplats Resources Corporation (Canplats), in 2007. In 2010 Goldcorp acquired 100% of the concession rights from Canplats. Orla acquired the project from Goldcorp in 2017.

 

6.2 Prior Exploration

 

The Camino Rojo gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit was discovered in mid-2007, approximately 45 km southwest of Concepcion del Oro, and was originally entirely concealed beneath post-mineral cover in a broad, low relief alluvial valley adjacent to the western flank of the Sierra Madre Oriental. Mineralized road ballast, placed on a dirt road near San Tiburcio, Zacatecas, was traced to its source by geologists Perry Durning and Bud Hillemeyer from La Cuesta International, working under contract to Canplats. A shallow pit excavated through a thin veneer of alluvium, located adjacent to a stock pond (Represa), was the discovery exposure of the deposit. Following a rapid program of surface pitting and trenching for geochemical samples, Canplats began concurrent programs of surface geophysics (resistivity and induced potential) and reverse-circulation drilling in late 2007, which continued into 2008.

 

The initial drilling was focused on a 450m x 600m gold in rock geochemical anomaly named the Represa zone. Core drilling began in 2008. The geophysical survey defined two principal areas of high chargeability: one centered on the Represa zone and another 1 km to the west named the Don Julio zone. The elevated chargeability zones were interpreted as large volumes of sulphide mineralized rocks. Drilling by Canplats, and later drilling by Goldcorp, confirmed the presence of extensive sulphide mineralization at depth in the Represa zone, and much lower quantities of sulphide minerals at Don Julio.

 

By August of 2008, Canplats drilled a total of 92 reverse-circulation, and 30 diamond-core holes, for a total of 23,988m and 16,044m respectively, mainly focused in the Represa zone. The surface access and permission to continue drilling were cancelled in early August 2008, by the ejido of San Tiburcio, Zacatecas. Nevertheless, in November 2008, Canplats published an independent Mineral Resource estimate for the Represa zone, as discussed in Section 6.4 of this report.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 6-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

In October 2009 Canplats publicly released a Preliminary Economic Assessment of the project (Blanchflower K. K., 2009). The preliminary economic assessment is historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The conclusions and recommendations of the historical Canplats assessment do not form the basis for the recommendations contained in this technical report.

  

Canplats was acquired by Goldcorp in early 2010. Validation, infill, condemnation, and expansion drilling began in January 2011. By the end of 2015, a total of 279,788m of new core drilling in 415 drillholes and 20,569m of new RC drilling in 96 drillholes was completed in the Represa and Don Julio zones and their immediate surroundings. An additional 31,286m of shallow RAB-style, RC drilling in 306 drillholes was completed, with most of the RAB drilling testing other exploration targets within the concession. Airborne gravity, magnetic and TEM surveys were also carried out, the results of which are in the archives of Minera Camino Rojo.

 

As of the end of 2015 a total of 295,832m in 445 diamond core holes, 44,557m in 188 RC drillholes, and 31,286m of RAB drilling had been completed.

 

Locations of historical drillholes and the project claim boundaries are summarized in Figure 6-1.

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 6-2

 

    

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

  

Figure 6-1
Historical Drillhole Locations and Project Claim Boundaries

 

Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource tabulations for Camino Rojo were publicly disclosed by Goldcorp as recently as 30 June 2016, as discussed in Section 6.4 of this report. The methodology of Goldcorp’s Mineral Resource estimations has not been disclosed and Dr. Gray has not confirmed the validity of the estimate, thus the Goldcorp estimates are regarded as historic estimates only, as discussed in Section 6.4 of this report.

 

6.3 Historical Metallurgical Studies

 

Canplats and Goldcorp conducted metallurgical tests which are discussed in Section 13.0 of this report.

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 6-3

 

   

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

6.4 Historical Resource Estimates

   

The resource estimates discussed herein were prepared prior to Orla having acquired the project and neither Dr. Gray, Mr. Defilippi, Mr. Hester, nor Orla have verified these estimates and they are considered historical estimates and should not be relied upon. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimates as current Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves and Orla is not treating these historical estimates as current estimates. A Current Mineral Resource is detailed in Section 14.0 of this report.

 

6.4.1 Canplats

 

Minorex Consulting prepared a resource estimate for Canplats in 2009 (Blanchflower J. , 2009) that was publicly disclosed in a Technical Report prepared in accordance with the disclosure standards of NI43-101. However, since the effective date of the resource estimate, significant additional drillhole data has become available, rendering the 2009 estimate obsolete. The 2009 resource estimate is historical in nature, has not been verified by the author, and should not be relied upon. Orla is not treating the historical estimate as a current estimate.

 

6.4.2 Goldcorp

 

Goldcorp publicly disclosed a Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resources report with information on Camino Rojo with an effective date of 30 June 2016 (Goldcorp Inc., 2017). Goldcorp’s historic Proven and Probable Mineral Reserve estimate for Camino Rojo was 75.52 Mt @ 0.70 gpt Au for 1.70M oz. contained gold, calculated at a gold price of $1,200 US$/oz and a silver price of $18.00 US$/oz. Goldcorp’s historic Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource estimate for Camino Rojo, exclusive of Reserves, was 223.08 Mt @ 1.05 gpt Au containing 7.50M oz. contained gold (Goldcorp Inc., 2017) calculated at a gold price of $1,400 US$/oz and silver price of $20.00 US$/oz. Goldcorp’s historic Inferred Mineral Resource estimate for Camino Rojo, exclusive of Reserves, was 17.16 Mt @ 0.88 gpt Au for 0.49M oz. contained gold, calculated at a gold price of $1,400 US$/oz and silver price of $20.00 US$/oz. Goldcorp’s historic estimates are summarized in Table 6-1, Table 6-2, and Table 6-3. The key assumptions, parameters, and methods used by Goldcorp to prepare the historical estimate are unknown. The 2016 reserve and resource estimates are historical in nature, have not been verified by the author, and should not be relied upon. Orla is not treating these historical estimates as current estimates.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 6-4

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

    

Table 6-1
2016 Camino Rojo Historical Proven and Probable Mineral Reserve Estimate by Goldcorp, $1,200 US$/oz. gold price and $18.00 US$/oz. silver price assumed

   

Category Tonnes x 106 Grade Au gpt Grade Ag gpt Contained
Ounces Au x 106
Contained
Ounces Ag x 106
Proven - - - - -
Probable 75.52 0.70 14.22 1.70 34.53
Proven +
Probable
75.52 0.70 14.22 1.70 34.53

 

 

Table 6-2
2016 Camino Rojo Historical Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate
by Goldcorp, $1,400 US$/oz. gold price and $20.00 US$/oz. silver price assumed.

 

Category Tonnes x 106 Grade Au gpt Grade Ag gpt Contained
Ounces Au x 106
Contained
Ounces Ag x 106
Measured - - - - -
Indicated 223.08 1.05 9.02 7.50 64.72
Measured +
Indicated
223.08 1.05 9.02 7.50 64.72

  

Table 6-3
2016 Camino Rojo Historical Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate by Goldcorp, $1,400 US$/oz. gold price and $20.00 US$/oz. silver price assumed.

 

Category Tonnes x 106 Grade Au gpt Grade Ag gpt Contained
Ounces Au x 106
Contained
Ounces Ag x 106
Inferred 17.16 0.88 9.06 0.49 5.00

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 6-5

 

   

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

6.5 Prior Production

  

There has been no recorded mineral production from the property. Surface gravels have been used for road material and a shallow excavation made for gravel extraction created the discovery exposure of the Camino Rojo deposit.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 6-6

 

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

7.0 GEOLOGICAL HISTORY AND MINERALIZATION

 

7.1 Sources of Information

 

The following geologic discussion is derived from a variety of peer-reviewed professional papers focused on the regional geology (Mitre-Salazar, 1989) (Centeno-Gracia, 2005) (Aranda-Gomez, 2006) (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007) (Loza-Aguirre I. N., 2008) (Tristán-González, 2009) (Barboza-Gudiño, 2010) (Weiss, 2010) (Ortega-Flores, 2015) (Cruz-Gámez, 2017), a Master’s of Science thesis from the University of Nevada-Reno that details the deposit geology (Sanchez, 2017), geologic maps published by the Servicio Geologico Mexicano, field and diamond drill core observations by Dr. Matthew Gray (Gray M. D., 2016) (Gray M. D., 2018) and Dr. Anthony Longo (Longo, 2017) (Longo, A.A., Edwards, J., 2017), and regional stratigraphy from previously published Technical Reports (Blanchflower K. K., 2009).

 

7.2 Regional Geology

 

The Camino Rojo deposit is located beneath a broad pediment of Tertiary and Quaternary alluvium (Figure 1-1) along the boundary between the Mesa Central physiographic province and the Sierra Madre Oriental fold and thrust belt near the pre-Laramide continental-margin. Oldest rocks are Triassic metamorphic continental rocks overlain by Early to Middle Jurassic red beds. Upper Jurassic to Upper Cretaceous marine facies rocks overlie the red beds at a disconformity and comprise a package of shelf carbonate rocks comprising the Zuloaga to Cuesta del Cura Formations and the basin-filling flysch sediments of the Indidura and Caracol Formations (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007), (Ortega-Flores, 2015). The deposit lies within the southern extent of the northwest striking San Tiburcio fault zone (Weiss, 2010).

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

A Permo-Triassic tectono-volcanic arc in the eastern Sierra Madre Oriental represents the first Pacific-directed subduction and tectonism in Central Mexico (Centeno-Gracia, 2005). Erosion of the eastern Triassic highlands shed siliciclastic material westward and turbidites off the continental shelf into the Triassic basin plains. These marine clastic rocks, the Triassic Zacatecas and El Alamar Formations (Cruz-Gámez, 2017) were subsequently metamorphosed to phyllites and schists (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007) then eroded before continental siliciclastic rocks or red beds were deposited atop an angular unconformity in Early Jurassic (Nazas Formation and later La Joya Formation (Barboza-Gudiño, 2010). A disconformity atop Lower Jurassic continental rocks preceded deposition of marine carbonate rocks belonging to the Zuloaga and La Caja Formations in Late Jurassic. Following a cessation of volcanism, arc magmatism flared up in the west along the Guerrero arc and continued through Late Cretaceous. Deposition of the shelf carbonate rocks progressed into Early Cretaceous with Taraises, Cupido, La Peña and Cuesta del Cura Formations. Upper Cretaceous flysch sediments derived from the erosion of the western Guerrero arc were deposited in the back-arc basin atop the carbonate rocks. The Mesozoic marine sediments were deformed during the Laramide orogeny from Late Cretaceous to Paleocene forming the Sierra Madre Oriental fold and thrust belt (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007). By late Paleocene, northeast of Mesa Central, a flexural bend in the fold and thrust belt deflected the Mesozoic strata into a series of west- and northwest-trending fold axes and faults (Tristán-González, 2009). South of the westward deflection, the fold belt strikes south to southeast. By early Eocene, the initial pulse of extensional tectonics produced north-northeast to north-northwest normal and strike-slip faults that bound mountain ranges (Matehuala fault zone) and deformed the southeast-trending fold belt along the eastern boundary of Mesa Central (Loza-Aguirre I. N., 2008). By middle Eocene, ranges in the fold and thrust belt were displaced and truncated by northwest-striking high angle faults that translated through the Mesa Central and feature both normal and strike-slip displacement (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007) (Tristán-González, 2009). Subsequent pulses of extension occurred from early Oligocene to Miocene and Pliocene to Quaternary that reactivated existing faults in conjunction with basaltic fissure volcanism and isolated monogenetic basaltic cinder cones (Aranda-Gomez, 2006).

 

The northwest faults include two major fault systems that localized middle Eocene to Oligocene magmatic activity and define the southern and northern boundaries of Mesa Central. The southern fault zone known as the San Luis-Tepehuanes fault system separates the Sierra Madre Occidental from Mesa Central and localizes numerous mineral deposits (Nieto-Samaniego, 2007) (Loza-Aguirre I. N., 2008). The northern fault zone known as the San Tiburcio lineament and fault zone extends for more than 185 km and features both left-lateral strike-slip and normal displacement (Mitre-Salazar, 1989). The fault truncates west-trending anticlinal axes in the flexural bend of the Sierra Madre Oriental and may crosscut the NNE-trending Matehuala fault zone that bounds the eastern Mesa Central. Anticlinal fold axes and faults parallel the San Tiburcio fault zone, and granitic intrusive rocks and dacitic to andesitic dikes are localized along portions of its extensive strike length.

 

Mineralization styles in the region include polymetallic and copper-gold skarn and limestone manto (replacement) silver-lead-zinc sulphide material in the Concepcion del Oro District, 50 km north of Camino Rojo (Buseck, 1966), and gold-silver-lead-zinc mineralized igneous diatreme-breccia, and sulphide-sulfosalt-carbonate veinlets and fracture fillings in the Caracol Formation at the Peñasquito mine (Rocha-Rocha, 2016).

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-2

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Figure 7-1

Regional Geologic Map (Servicio Geologico Mexicano, 2000)

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-3

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

7.3 Local and Property Geology

 

7.3.1 General Deposit Geology

 

Camino Rojo is a gold-silver-zinc-lead deposit concealed below shallow (<1m to 3 m) alluvial cover in a large pediment along the southwest border of the Sierra Madre Oriental (Weiss, 2010). Small water storage pits and trenches expose a portion of the oxide deposit in the discovery area known as Represa zone (i.e. water reservoir). The Late Cretaceous Caracol Formation is the primary mineralization host, and at depth, the upper Indidura Formation is a minor mineralization host along the Caracol contact. The local geology is summarized in Figure 7-2. The deposit stratigraphy, known from current diamond drilling, is discussed below from oldest to youngest.

 

Early Cretaceous Cuesta del Cura Formation features thin- to medium-bedded gray limestone with wavy laminations and locally discontinuous layers of black shale and chert. Polymetallic replacement manto-type occurrences are typically found in Cuesta del Cura elsewhere in the region. No significant mineralization has been found in these limestones at Camino Rojo. Late Cretaceous Indidura Formation features thin-bedded calcareous shale, gray shaley limestone and siltstone with estimated thicknesses that range from 100m to 220m (Figure 7-3). Atop the Indidura, the Caracol Formation consists of thinly interlayered carbonaceous and calcareous siltstones, silty mudstones, and fine-grained calcareous sandstone, and thicknesses range from 600m to 800m (Figure 7-4). Sandstone layers typically display cross-laminations, and the lowest occurrence of sandstone is considered the Indidura contact (Sanchez, 2017). Camino Rojo vein-style mineralization has not been found to extend below the Indidura into the Cuesta del Cura Formation, although drilling is sparse. The few drill holes that have penetrated below Indidura discovered marbleized limestone and slight calc-silicate hornfels alteration in the Cuesta del Cura Formation (Figure 7-5).

 

Three genetically different types of igneous dikes intruded the Cretaceous marine sediments at Camino Rojo. Type 1 dikes are medium- to coarse-grained porphyritic hornblende-biotite-feldspar porphyry. Type 2 dikes are fine-grained with rare quartz phenocyrsts (1-2mm dia.). Type 3 dikes have coarse-grained hornblende with plagioclase (Sanchez, 2017). The dikes consistently display hydrothermal alteration so the actual petrologic and chemical compositions are unknown. They are assumed as intermediate composition igneous dikes (Sanchez, 2017). Drill-supported models created by Orla show dikes are oriented in two parallel subvertical northeast-trending planes spatially associated with the deposit shape. Mineralization stage IS veins crosscut the dikes and feature bleached halos of sericite alteration.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-4

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Figure 7-2

Local Geology, Camino Rojo Deposit (Servicio Geologico Mexicano, 2014)

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-5

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Figure 7-3
Drillcore from CR12-345D, 818m, showing relatively uniform nature of siltstone and shale beds in Indidura Formation, stratigraphically below Caracol Formation. Indidura is distinguished from Caracol by the absence of rhythmic sandstone-shale beds. Interval from 817.5m to 819.0m assayed 18 ppb Au.

 

Figure 7-4
Drillcore from CR12-345D, 254m , showing typical and diagnostic interbedded centimeter scale sandstone, siltstone, and shale beds, fining upward turbiditic sequence, in unoxidized Caracol Formation. Sample assayed less than 5 ppb Au. Stratigraphic top is to right.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-6

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Figure 7-5
Drillcore from CR12-345D, 993m , showing marbleized Cuesta del Cura limestone, stratigraphically below Indidura Formation. Interval from 991.5m to 993.0m assayed 44 ppb Au.

 

7.3.2 Structural Setting

 

The Camino Rojo deposit is situated within the northwest-striking San Tiburcio fault zone that features both left-lateral strike-slip and normal displacement (Mitre-Salazar, 1989) (Weiss, 2010). Anticlinal fold axes and faults parallel the San Tiburcio fault zone lend credence to a possible 15 km wide zone encompassing Camino Rojo that experienced extensional deformation. None the less, the deposit shape features a northeast trend that plunges southwest. Intermediate composition dikes localized within the deposit also strike northeast.

 

7.3.3 Mineralized Zones

 

Three stages of mineralization have been observed in the Camino Rojo deposit, and two types of high-grade material (Longo, 2017) (Longo, A.A., Edwards, J., 2017).

 

Stage 1 K-metasomatism (adularia?)-pyrite - K-metasomatism with disseminated pyrite replaced the mudstone, siltstone and fine-grained sandstones in the Caracol. Mineralization is typically low grade gold with 0.1-0.4 grams gold (Figure 7-6, Figure 7-7).

 

Stage 2 Intermediate Sulfidation (IS) veins – IS veins with pyrite-arsenopyrite-sphalerite±galena, calcite and minor quartz. Moderate to high grade gold (0.4 to +4.0 grams/tonne), high zinc grades (0.5 to >2.0% Zn) and high values of As, Pb and Ba, with variable Ag. Sanchez (2017) reports electrum and acanthite in Stage 2.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-7

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

IS Type 1 are pyrite-sphalerite-calcite veins with high values of Au-Zn-Ba, and low to moderate values of As, low Sb, and moderate to high Pb (Figure 7-8).

 

IS Type 2 – IS veins with pyrite-arsenopyrite-quartz ±calcite and sphalerite-sulfosalts?, high gold (up to 60 g/t Au), Ag, As, Sb.

 

Stage 3 LS veins – colloform banded quartz veins, drusy-coxcomb quartz veins, and quartz-cemented, polymict hydrothermal breccia with pyrite-galena-sulfosalts, adularia? and electrum?. Moderate to high gold grades (2.0 to 15.0 grams/tonne Au) with high Ag (100 to 500 grams/tonne), and high As and Sb values, but variable to low Zn, Pb, and Ba values.

 

At hand specimen scale, mineralization is controlled by bedding and fractures. The sandy and silty beds of the turbidite sequences of the Caracol Formation are preferentially mineralized, with pyrite disseminations and semi-massive stringers hosted within them, presumably due to higher porosity and permeability relative to the enclosing shale beds. Basal layers of the turbiditic sandstone beds are often preferentially mineralized (Figure 7-6, Figure 7-7). Bedding discordant open space filling fractures and structurally controlled breccia zones host banded sulphide veins and sulphide matrix breccias (Figure 7-8, Figure 7-9). Some higher grade vein and breccia zones are localized along the margins of dikes of intermediate composition.

 

Dr. Gray observed mineralization in drill core over vertical intervals greater than 400m, with mineralization occurring in a broad NE-SW trending elongate zone as much as 300m wide and 700m long.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-8

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Figure 7-6
Drillcore from CR12 345D, 395m , pyrite concentrations developed in basal sandy layer of fining upward sandstone-siltstone-shale/mudstone turbiditic sequence of Caracol Formation. Note textbook turbiditic sequence comprised of cross bedded sandstone above laminar basal sand, and scour marks of basal sand into black pelagic sediments that mark top of lower and base of upper turbidite sequence. Stratigraphic up is to right of photo. Interval from 394.5m to 396.0m assayed 0.211 gpt Au, 8 gpt Ag, 101 ppm Pb, 128 ppm Zn, and 245 ppm As.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-9

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Figure 7-7
Drillcore from CR12 345D, 727m , pyrite concentrations developed in silty and sandy beds of turbiditic sequence of Caracol Formation. Stratigraphic up is to right of photo. Interval from 726.0m to 727.5m assayed 0.109 gpt Au, 1 ppm Ag, 19 ppm Pb, 56 ppm Zn, and 114 ppm As.

 

Figure 7-8
Drillcore from CR11 267D, 490m , banded pyrite-marmatite (Fe rich sphalerite) carbonate veinlet. Interval from 489.5m to 491m assayed 4.76 gpt Au, 22 gpt Ag, 572 ppm Pb, 16850 ppm Zn, and 7240 ppm As. Surrounding sample intervals without discordant sulfide veinlets assayed only 0.793 and 0.279 gpt Au. Note that sulfide veinlet is nearly parallel to core axis.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-10

 

 

 

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 7-9

Drillcore from CR11 267D, 473m, pyrite-marmatite (Fe rich sphalerite) matrix bedding discordant breccia. Interval from 471.5m to 473.0m assayed 1.710 gpt Au, 14 gpt Ag, 411 ppm Pb, 3050 ppm Zn, and 4290 ppm As. Surrounding sample intervals without discordant sulfide veinlets assayed only 0.188 and 0.310 gpt Au.

 

7.3.4 Alteration

 

Distinct alteration styles accompanied each stage of mineralization (Longo, 2017) (Longo, A.A., Edwards, J., 2017):

 

Stage 1 - K-metasomatism (adularia? flooding), decarbonization and sulfidation (forming fine-grained pyrite). This alteration assemblage is typically associated with low metal concentrations, except where cut by IS veins, then grades increase. Temperature of this event is unknown and likely not a high temperature (>400 to 700⁰C) event characteristic of K-silicate alteration in porphyry Cu deposits.

 

Stage 2 - sericite-calcite ±pyrite-quartz overprints Stage 1 and is associated with pyrite-arsenopyrite and pyrite-sphalerite-galena mineral stage veins (Sanchez, 2017). Veins that crosscut the igneous dikes display prominent alteration halos. Sericitic halos to mineral stage veins are not visually obvious in the sediments with intense K-metasomatism.

 

7.4 Oxidation

 

Oxidation was observed to range from complete oxidation in the uppermost portions of the deposit, generally underlain or surrounded by a zone of mixed oxide and sulphide mineralization where oxidation is complete along fracture zones and within permeable strata, but lacking in the remainder of the rock, which then is generally underlain by a sulphide zone in which no oxidation is observed.

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-11

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Oxidation of the deposit is ~100%, extending from surface to depths of 100m to 150m. The underlying transitional zone of mixed oxide/sulphide extends over a vertical interval in excess of 100m, and is characterized by partial oxidation controlled by bedding and structures.

 

The sandy layers of the turbiditic sequence are preferentially oxidized, creating a stratigraphically interlayered sequence of oxide and sulphide material at the cm scale (Figure 7-10), with oxidation along structures affecting all strata (Figure 7-11). The partial oxidation of the Caracol Formation preferentially oxidizes the mineralized strata thus incomplete oxidation in the transition zone may result in nearly complete oxidation of the gold bearing portion of the rock, thus the metallurgical characteristics of mixed oxide/sulphide may vary greatly, with some material exhibiting characteristics similar to oxide material.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-12

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 7-10
Drillcore from CR11 258D, 256m, partially oxidized mineralized Caracol Formation. Note that oxidation is controlled by both bedding and structures. Sandy turbiditic beds are preferentially oxidized in the oxide/sulfide transition zone, whereas interlayered mudstone and shale beds are unoxidized. Oxidation affects all beds adjacent to structures.

 

 

Figure 7-11
Drillcore from CR11 258D, 257m, oxidized Caracol Formation. Interval from 256.5m to 258.0m assayed 3.52 gpt Au, 33 gpt Ag, 6070 ppm Pb, 6060 ppm Zn, and 2590 ppm As. Note oxidized sulfide veinlet crosscutting bedding, seen below the knife.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-13

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

7.5 Conclusions

 

The distribution of mineralization at Camino Rojo is controlled by both primary bedding and discordant structures. Near surface oxidation extends to depths in excess of 100m, and extends to greater depths along structurally controlled zones of fracturing and permeability.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 7-14

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES

 

The observed geologic and geochemical characteristics of the gold-silver-lead-zinc deposit at Camino Rojo are consistent with those of a distal oxidized gold skarn deposit. Characteristics of these deposits (Meinert, L.D., Dipple, G.M., and Nicolescu, S., 2005) are summarized as:

 

· Typically found in lithologies containing some limestone, but deposits not restricted to limestones.

 

· Formed by regional or contact metamorphic processes by metasomatic fluids, often of magmatic origin.

 

· Typically zoned deposits with a general pattern of garnet and pyroxene minerals proximal to the mineralizing heat and fluid source, and distal zones of bleaching.

 

· Low total sulphide content.

 

· Sulphide mineralogy comprised of pyrite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and galena.

 

· Highest gold grades are associated with late relatively lower temperature mineralizing events, often with potassium feldspar and quartz gangue.

 

· May be transitional to epithermal deposits.

 

The near surface portion of the Camino Rojo deposit has characteristics consistent with those of the distal skarn zone, transitional to epithermal mineralization, and overlies garnet bearing skarn mineralization encountered in the deeper portions of the system.

 

Skarn deposits often exhibit predictable patterns of mineral zoning and metal zoning. Application of skarn zoning models to exploration allows for inferences about the possible lateral and depth extents of the mineralized system at the Camino Rojo deposit and can be used to guide further exploration drill programs.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 8-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

9.0 EXPLORATION

 

Orla has conducted reconnaissance geologic evaluations of portions of its mining concessions. As of the effective date of this report, an induced polarization geophysical survey is in process over the known area of mineralization, over the proposed area of infrastructure development and to the west of these areas. It is not yet complete. A small orientation soil survey has been conducted over the resource area. A 2,200m HQ core drill program to obtain samples for additional metallurgical studies is underway, as is a 3,000m Reverse Circulation drill program testing for potential water well locations. Orla has not yet conducted any drilling to explore for new mineralized zones. Historic exploration by prior operators is summarized in Section 6.0 of this report.

 

Through the effective date of this report, Orla has completed approximately 1,850m of additional drilling in 10 diamond core holes for metallurgical sampling and 1,900m of drilling in 6 reverse circulation holes testing for water. In addition, approximately 100 line-km of Induced Polarization geophysical survey have been completed and 325 rock and soil samples have been collected.

 

Rock samples are sent to the ALS Minerals (ALS) sample preparation facility in Zacatecas, Mexico. Sample analysis is performed in the ALS laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia. All gold results are obtained by ALS using fire assay fusion and an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish (Au-AA23). All samples are also analyzed for multi-elements, including silver and copper, using an Aqua Regia (ME-ICP41).

 

Regional exploration continues to field check interpreted targets, consisting of coincident historic geochemical, airborne geophysical and satellite imagery anomalies. Although several areas of alteration and iron oxide-carbonate veining have been observed, no significant sample results have been returned to date. Results from the orientation soil survey over the known deposit area to test for any characteristic signature indicates the geochemical “halo” over the deposit is tightly restricted to sub/outcrop. Anomalous gold (>0.2 g/t) is most closely associated with elevated arsenic (>100 ppm) and zinc (>300ppm).

 

Modelling and interpretation of the IP data is pending. Material from the metallurgical holes will be sent to the KCA laboratory in Reno for testing. The RC program for water testing in not advanced enough to make any conclusions.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 9-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

10.0 DRILLING

 

10.1 General

 

The drillhole database provided to IMC contained 900 drillholes and 368,418m of drilling. Table 10-1 summarizes the drilling by company, date, and type of drilling. During 2007 and 2008 Canplats drilled 121 holes for 39,831m of drilling, about 11% of the drilling by meters. This was 92 RC holes and 29 core holes. Between 2011 and 2015 Goldcorp drilled 779 holes for 328,587m of drilling. These were 95 RC holes, 306 rotary air blast (“RAB”) holes, and 378 core holes. The 2015 holes and some of the late 2014 holes were drilled for geotechnical investigations. Compared with the drilling reported in Section 6.2 of this report, Table 10-1 reports one less Canplats core hole, one less Goldcorp RC hole, and 37 less Goldcorp core holes. The remainder of the historic drilling is included in the current database. All drill results come from previous operators and no drilling conducted by or on behalf of Orla is included in this report.

 

Table 10-1
Summary of Camino Rojo Drilling, 2007-2015

 

          RC Holes     RAB Holes     Core Holes     Total Holes  
Year     Company   Holes     Meters     Holes     Meters     Holes     Meters     Holes     Meters  
2007     Canplats     12       2,367                                       12       2,367  
2008     Canplats     80       21,621                       29       15,843       109       37,464  
2007-08     Canplats     92       23,988                       29       15,843       121       39,831  
2011     Goldcorp     91       18,447       138       10,008       124       54,249       353       82,704  
2012     Goldcorp     4       1,116       160       18,514       38       35,606       202       55,236  
2013     Goldcorp                                     134       110,305       134       110,305  
2014     Goldcorp                     8       2,764       79       75,478       87       78,242  
2015     Goldcorp                                     3       2,100       3       2,100  
2011-15     Goldcorp     95       19,563       306       31,286       378       277,738       779       328,587  
ALL           187       43,551       306       31,286       407       293,581       900       368,418  

 

Note: Quantity of drillholes is not consistent with Section 6.2 as the remainder of historical drillholes are in the IMC database.

 

Figure 10-1 shows the drillhole locations by drilling type and Figure 10-2 shows the drilling by company. Note that the RAB holes are mostly peripheral to the main mineral deposit area. The denser drilling in the northeast portion of the deposit is the area of interest for this PEA. This material is relatively close to the surface and oxidized. To the southwest the mineralization is deeper with higher amounts of sulfide.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 10-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

10.2 Canplats Drilling

  

The Canplats drilling was conducted during 2007 and 2008. It is reported the RC holes were drilled by Tiger Drilling de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and Layne de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. The rigs used drilled holes of either 4.75in or 5.5in (12cm or 14cm) diameter. Most of the core holes are HQ and drilled by Major Drilling. Four PQ holes were drilled to collect metallurgical samples, but only three of them are in the IMC database.

 

It was reported that Canplats did not do downhole surveys for the RC holes. However, Goldcorp was able to re-enter most of the holes and do the surveys. Most of the Canplat RC holes currently have detailed downhole survey information.

 

Core and RC logging procedures for Canplats drilling were described by Blanchflower (2009). For RC drilling, Canplats sampling personnel extracted spoon size splits from each drill interval at the rig’s cyclone splitter, washed away the fine fraction with a strainer, and placed the washed splits into divided plastic chip trays. Canplats geologists subsequently logged the RC cuttings in the office and storage building, describing each interval on paper log forms with codes for lithology, alteration, mineralization and fracturing. The logged information was later captured into electronic spreadsheet files.

 

Core was logged prior to hydraulic splitting and sampling. Canplats geologists used paper logging forms to record descriptions of color, lithology, alteration, mineralization, bedding, and fracture and fault angles to the core axis. Descriptions used a combination of alpha-numeric codes and normal text, and included hand-drawn graphic sketches. The logged information was later captured into electronic spreadsheet files for importation in the database.

 

The Canplats drilling discovered and partially delineated the oxide mineral deposit that occurs at the northeast end of the Camino Rojo deposit, in the Represa zone. The drilling also discovered the deeper sulphide deposit to the southwest, in the Don Julio zone. This data was used to develop a mineral resource and PEA level study for the Represa zone by Canplats during 2009.

 

10.3 Goldcorp Drilling

 

The Goldcorp drilling was conducted from 2011 to 2015. The RC drilling was conducted by Layne de Mexico and G4 Drilling. The RC holes were 4.75in to 5.125in in diameter (12cm to 13cm). The core holes were drilled by Layne, BD Drilling, and Boart-Longyear and were generally HQ core. In addition to the core and RC holes, 306 RAB holes were drilled. The average depth of these holes was only about 100m and were mostly peripheral to the main deposit area. Downhole surveys were conducted for the core and RC drilling, but not for the RAB holes. They were assumed vertical.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 10-2

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Most of the holes are orientated north with an approximate 60o north plunge. This is an optimal orientation for the bedding, which dips moderately to the south/southeast. This direction is less optimal for steep north dipping structures and intercepts with narrow veins at low to very low angles to the core axis have been observed in many holes. There are two sections with holes directed to the south drilled by Goldcorp. However, it would be desirable to drill more holes directed south with a 45 to 60o south plunge to intersect structures with a similar attitude as the dike, southwest to northeast trending with a steep north dip. However, these holes require access to ground controlled by the Adjacent Owner.

 

Goldcorp RC chip logging was recorded to paper log forms by Goldcorp geologists at the RC drill sites, concurrent with drilling. Washed fines and chips from each interval were examined and logged, and a spoon-sized split was placed into divided chip trays for future reference. As of this writing, the chip trays are available for inspection. The Goldcorp geologists described and recorded the lithology, alteration, fracture/fault zones, oxidation class, percent oxidation by volume, estimated percent and type of iron oxides, estimated percent sphalerite, galena, pyrite, and other sulfides, calcite, other veins, and color. Descriptive text and a graphic sketch column were also recorded. These data were later captured into electronic spreadsheet files for importation into the database.

 

Core logging by Goldcorp was carried out on whole core, prior to any core cutting or sampling. All core was brought by Goldcorp personnel to the core logging shelter, rinsed with water, and measured from run blocks to determine core depths contained in each core box. Goldcorp geologists logged lithology, alteration, fracture/fault zones, oxidation class, and percent oxidation by volume. Graphic sketch columns for lithology, bedding, fracture and fault angles to core axes, and mineralization were also recorded. Estimated percentages of sulphide and gangue minerals, as well as their mode of occurrence were recorded as text. Logged information was later captured into electronic spreadsheet files for importation into the database. In 2012 the logging was modified to include fields for estimated percentages of various sulphide minerals. During 2010 Goldcorp geologists re-logged the Canplats RC drill cuttings to determine the degree of oxidation of each drill interval in terms of percent oxidation of the rock by volume. The Goldcorp drilling further delineated both the oxide and sulphide mineral resources. The oxide portion of the deposit has sufficient drilling to conduct studies at the Feasibility Study level. The sulphide deposit has sufficient drilling to conduct studies at the PEA or Preliminary Feasibility level of study.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 10-3

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

10.4 Sampling

 

Goldcorp sample intervals were consistently 1.5m for core, RC, and RAB drilling. For Canplats RC drilling about 20% of the sample intervals were 1.0m and 80% 2.0m intervals. Canplats core samples tended to be 2.0m intervals, but about 30% of the intervals were shorter and of random length. According to the Canplats 2009 Technical Report, the geologist could adjust the sample intervals to correspond with geologic contacts.

 

For the RC drilling by Canplats and Goldcorp a splitter was used at the drill rig and the sample collected in the field. For core, for both Canplats and Goldcorp, the samples were split at the secure facilities and bagged for shipment to the sample preparation laboratories.

 

There is no recovery information for Canplats drilling or for any of the RC or RAB drilling. The recovery for Goldcorp core was very high, generally above 90% and the overall average was about 96%.

 

10.5 Conclusions

 

It is the opinion of IMC that the drilling and sampling procedures for Camino Rojo drill samples are reasonable and adequate. IMC does not know of any drilling, sampling, or recovery factors that would materially impact the reliability of the results.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 10-4

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 10-1
Drilling by Type, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 10-5

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 10-2
Drilling by Company, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 10-6

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY

 

11.1 Sample Preparation

 

The sampling and analysis was supervised by the geological staff of Canplats for 2007 and 2008 drilling and by Goldcorp for 2011 through 2014 drilling. As of this writing, Orla has not done any additional drilling and sampling.

 

ALS Chemex has been the primary assay laboratory used for the routine assaying of surface and drill samples for both the Canplats and Goldcorp drilling/sampling programs. All of the assays have been done at the ALS Chemex laboratory in North Vancouver, British Columbia, certified under ISO 9001: 2000, and 2008, and accredited under ISO 17025:2005. ALS Chemex is independent of each of Canplats and Goldcorp.

 

The Canplats samples were prepared for assaying at the ALS Chemex sample preparation laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico. Most of the Goldcorp samples were prepared at the ALS Chemex sample preparation laboratory in Zacatecas, Mexico. However, during 2013 and 2014 samples were also sent to the ALS Chihuahua facility and the ALS Guadalajara preparation lab as well as Zacatecas facility.

 

Upon receipt at the sample preparation labs the samples were dried, crushed in their entirety to >70% passing a 6mm screen. The crushed material was riffle split to extract an approximate 250 gram sub-sample that was pulverized to >85% passing 75 microns in a disc pulverizer. This sample preparation procedure is the standard ALS Chemex “PREP-31” procedure. Each of the 250 gram pulps were riffle split into two sealed paper sample envelopes, with one split air-shipped to the ALS Chemex assay facility in North Vancouver. The second split was returned to the property for storage. The same sample preparation procedure was used for core and RC chips.

 

11.2 Analyses

 

The core and RC samples collected by Canplats and Goldcorp, as well as the surface pit and trench samples collected by Canplats, were assayed with the same analytical methods and at the same laboratory, the ALS Chemex facility in North Vancouver, British Columbia. For gold, all were assayed using the Au-AA23 30 gram fire assay fusion, with Atomic Absorption finish. A total of 33 other elements were determined four-acid sample digestion followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES). This is ALS Chemex method code ME-ICP61. The elements assayed by ICP-AES are Ag, Al, As, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, K, La, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, S, Sb, Sc, Sr, Th, Ti, Tl, U, V, W, and Zn.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 11-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Over-limits for gold were automatically re-assayed with 30-gram fire assay fusion with gravimetric finish (method code Au-GRA21). Over-limits for silver, copper, lead and zinc were automatically performed by four acid digestion of the sample followed by analysis by ICP-AES. This is ALS Chemex method code ME-OG62 for material grade samples.

 

RAB-style RC samples from 2011 to 2014 were analyzed at ALS Chemex using method code ME-MS61m, which employs the same four-acid digestion, and a combination of Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES), mass-spectrometry, and cold-vapor Atomic Absorption to determine 48 elements plus mercury. Most of the RAB holes are peripheral to the main deposit area.

 

11.3 QA/QC Programs

 

11.3.1 Canplats QA/QC Program

 

It is reported that the Canplats Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QA/QC) program was based on the insertion of control samples at a target rate of 5% to the assay laboratory (Blanchflower, 2009). A quality control sample was to be inserted randomly within every 20 consecutive samples, alternating between standard, blank or duplicate samples. The standard and blank samples were inserted into the sample sequence as the sample shipment was being readied. Duplicate samples were inserted into the sample sequence at the time of collection (Blanchflower, 2009). As reported by Blanchflower (2009) the final, compiled database for 2007 and 2008 drilling included 2,165 blanks and standards, and 1,078 field duplicates. However, relatively few of the Canplats QA/QC samples (about three holes) are included in the current database, so this data cannot be independently verified. Only about 10% of the drilling was done by Canplats.

 

11.3.2 Goldcorp QA/QC Program

 

Goldcorp’s QA/QC program included the use of blanks, standards and field duplicates for all drilling to monitor potential sample numbering issues and contamination during sample preparation, as well as analytical accuracy and precision. The control sample insertion rate was originally targeted at 7%, and Goldcorp personnel inserted all QA/QC samples during sample collection, prior to placing the samples in the storage area for shipment to the laboratory. A blank was inserted every 25 samples and consisted of fragments of unaltered calcareous siltstone and sandstone of the Caracol Formation, from a borrow pit near Tanque Nuevo, Zacatecas, approximately 60 km northeast of Camino Rojo. For RC blanks the Caracol material was hand-crushed to coarse gravel size, and for core drilling blanks the material was broken into fragments similar to drill core size. A standards was inserted every 50 samples usually immediately following the blanks. Standards have included the commercial standards CDN-ME-15 and CDN-ME-16, from CDN Resource Laboratories in Vancouver, B.C., and three in-house reference materials, PEN1850OX, PEN1850T and STDCR14-01, all prepared at SGS Minerales in Durango. The first two were prepared from bulk samples of oxide and mixed oxide-sulphide material from Peñasquito and the latter from Camino Rojo drill core. Field duplicates were inserted every 100th sample, labelled with a “B” suffix to the original sample number. Field duplicates were two ¼’s of the same ½ piece of sawn core. A total of 10,583 control samples were inserted in 2011 through 2013, for a realized control insertion rate of just below 8%.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 11-2

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

A comprehensive compilation and review of Goldcorp’s QA/QC program during 2014 determined that while adequate, the program had several aspects that could be significantly improved through a few simple and easy to implement changes including:

 

· At 8% the overall insertion rate was considered low and that a higher proportion of QA/QC samples, distributed more evenly, were needed.

 

· Over significant periods of time only a single standard had been used and that several standards should be used on a rotation basis.

 

· The ¼ core duplicate could not assess variability in the regular samples properly and that the full second half of core should be used instead.

 

Early in 2014 a new QA/QC protocol was adopted where a QA/QC material would be inserted every 10th sample for an improved insertion rate of 10%. Three standards were used in a rotation, alternating with blanks and duplicates such that every 80 samples two blanks, two ½ core duplicates and 4 standards were inserted into the sample sequence.

 

Goldcorp implemented procedures in 2012 for improved follow-up of QA/QC analytical data (Ristorcelli and Ronning, 2012). The project database manager was to review blank and standard assay results as new data was received and loaded into the project master assay table. Standards more than three deviations from the expected values and blanks with gold values greater than 0.020 g/t, or silver values greater than to 1.5 g/t, were reported to the project exploration manager and via email to ALS Chemex for investigation. The exploration manager, database manager and ALS Chemex QA/QC staff communicated to identify the cause of the elevated blank or unexpected standard result.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 11-3

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Depending on the cause, the exploration manager ordered appropriate steps as necessary for re-assays, or submission of remaining sample splits for new assays, and instructed the database manager on any changes needed to the assay database.

 

The Goldcorp QA/QC samples were included in the database provided to IMC. IMC has reviewed this data, including developing some independent control charts. It is the opinion of IMC that the Goldcorp QA/QC program met or exceeded industry standards.

 

11.4 Sample Security

 

After collection in the field, the Canplats core and RC samples were transported by truck to a secure warehouse in San Tiburcio, a distance of about 5 km. After each drill core sample was split in half by sawing and bagged, the sample bags were tied shut with non-slip plastic ties. The sample bags were then moved to a locked storage area in the core logging and storage facility controlled by the company geologists. Prior to shipping, several sample bags were placed into large woven nylon ‘rice’ bags, their contents were marked on each bag, and each bag was securely sealed.

 

The sample bags were delivered directly to the ALS Chemex assay laboratory in Guadalajara, Jalisco State, Mexico by company personnel.

 

During the Goldcorp tenure, samples were transported from the field to a secure warehouse and logging area in San Tiburcio, usually twice a day, morning and late afternoon. Sealed individual sample bags of sawn core were loaded into numbered rice sacks which were tied closed and placed in the secure storage building each afternoon. Once or twice a week the sealed sacks were loaded into a delivery truck operated under contract to ALS Chemex and delivered to the preparation labs.

 

Orla took possession of the Goldcorp facility in San Tiburcio. As of this writing the core, many of the assay pulps, and the RC chip trays are stored at this facility. The facility is walled with locked gates.

 

It is the opinion of IMC that the sample preparation, analysis, QA/QC programs and sample security were adequate to ensure the reliability of the drilling database.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 11-4

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

12.0 DATA VERIFICATION

 

IMC selected 20 holes at random from the Camino Rojo database and compared the database with original assay certificates. The holes were:

 

CR13-459D CR11-289D CR12-344D CR11-332D
CR13-380D CR13-428D CR13-390D CR13-422D
BCR-006 BCR-044 BCR-066 CR13-424D
CR11-266D BCR-078 CRD-021 CR11-284D
BCR-011 BCR-019 CR11-305D CR13-497D

 

The gold, silver, lead, and zinc assays in the database were compared with the certificates. The checked data amounted to about 7,623 assay intervals.

 

For gold there were minor discrepancies in the certificates versus the database for nine intervals; one in CR11-266D and eight in CR13-380D. The database and certificate values were similar, so the discrepancies are not material. There were also eight discrepancies for silver and zinc and seven discrepancies for lead in hole CR13-380D, generally in the same records as gold. This is an indication that a section of hole CR13-380D might have been re-assayed.

 

There were also 10 discrepancies for silver, lead, and zinc in hole BCR-019. They were the same 10 assay intervals. Again, the certificate and database values were similar, so the discrepancies are not material.

 

Based on the comparisons IMC concluded the database assay values are reliable.

 

IMC also compared collar elevations of the drillholes with topography. The elevations were in very good agreement with the exception of 15 holes, mostly on one drill fence, at the south end of the drilling. The holes are not in the resource area and are not material for the present study.

 

Minera Camino Rojo personnel have also re-surveyed many of the drillhole collars to verify the original surveys. IMC believes the collar coordinates of the drillholes are accurate.

 

IMC is of the opinion that the Camino Rojo drillhole database is acceptable for PEA, Prefeasibility and Feasibility level studies.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 12-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING

 

Metallurgical test work programs on the Camino Rojo project were commissioned by the prior operators of the project, Canplats Mexico and Goldcorp, and are considered as historical data. No metallurgical studies have been conducted by Orla at this time. Test work and results from the programs carried out to date for Camino Rojo are summarized chronologically below.

 

13.1 Canplats (2009)

 

Canplats commissioned SGS Mineral Services Minerals in Durango, Mexico to conduct bottle roll, column, and flotation tests between two programs on Camino Rojo drill core samples and in 2009 publicly disclosed results of 18 column tests, 61 bottle roll tests, and 35 flotation tests. The results summarized herein are extracted from the Canplats 2009 technical report (Blanchflower, K.D., Kaye, C., and Steidtmann, H., 2009).

 

Composite samples for the first program by SGS were obtained from diamond drill cores of oxide and transition material. Tests performed during the first program included bottle roll, column leach and flotation. The second program used samples from diamond drill cores of oxide, sulphide and transition materials. Material from the second program was used for bottle roll and flotation tests. No mineralogy, bond work index and crusher abrasion index tests were performed.

 

Column leach tests results are summarized in Table 13-1 and Table 13-2 for oxide and transition composites, respectively, and indicate crush sizes between 37mm and 9.5mm for oxide material have a negligible effect on gold recovery. Silver recoveries tended to increase as the crush size was reduced to 9.5mm. The effect of crush size on transition material was only evaluated on 2 samples and there were insufficient data to show any meaningful trends. In general, gold recovery was higher for oxide material than transition material. Silver recoveries were consistently higher in transition samples than in oxide samples. Maximum gold and silver recoveries for oxide material were achieved between 40 and 50 days. Different recovery trends for gold and silver based on material classification (oxide or transition) were evident. At a 19mm crush size, modeling of recovery versus head grades indicated that at a 0.7 gpt Au head grade, a gold recovery of approximately 74% for oxide material and 69% for transition material is predicted. At a 14 gpt Ag head grade, column test results indicated a silver recovery of approximately 23% for oxide material and 28% for transition material.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 13-1
Oxide Column Test Results SGS Mineral Services Minerals

 

  Crush     Calculated Head
Grade
    Extraction     Consumption  
Column   Size
(mm)
    Gold
(g/t)
    Silver
(g/t)
    Gold
(%)
    Silver
(%)
    NaCN
(kg/T)
    CaO
(kg/T)
 
CRM-06-1     38       0.672       8.27       72.59       12.84       0.66       2.29  
      19       0.603       9.36       73.31       14.91       0.87       3.34  
      9.5       0.537       9.00       73.65       19.02       0.81       4.28  
                                                         
CRM-06-2/3     38       1.952       10.63       83.66       12.05       0.79       2.36  
      19       1.794       11.51       86.6       21.23       0.99       2.81  
      9.5       1.795       11.58       86.49       25.27       1.23       4.60  
                                                         
CRM-14-1     38       0.508       19.24       62.14       30.39       0.78       3.00  
      19       0.486       18.01       64.14       32.29       0.62       3.30  
      9.5       0.486       18.01       61.81       28.06       0.91       4.30  
                                                         
CRM-20-1     38       0.369       14.09       65.15       23.16       0.58       2.63  
      19       0.338       17.94       78.08       23.21       0.55       2.31  
      9.5       0.359       15.26       74.81       30.88       0.71       3.55  

 

Table 13-2
Transition Column Test Results SGS Mineral Services Minerals

 

    Crush     Calculated Head Grade     Extraction     Consumption  
Column   Size
(mm)
    Gold
(g/t)
    Silver
(g/t)
    Gold
(%)
    Silver
(%)
    NaCN
(kg/T)
    CaO
(kg/T)
 
CRM-14-2     38       0.431       15.51       34.74       33.71       0.67       1.59  
      19       0.446       13.63       36.35       38.95       0.61       1.44  
      9.5       0.387       15.33       33.13       44.15       0.81       2.53  
                                                         
CRM-20-2     38       0.593       21.51       55.2       30.54       0.54       1.55  
      19       0.585       28.58       62.39       31.74       0.47       1.48  
      9.5       0.589       22.35       60.51       50.87       0.84       2.83  

 

Bottle roll tests did not show any clear distinction between gold and silver recoveries for the oxide, transition and sulphide materials tested. Dissolution of gold and silver was essentially complete after 48 hours. Slightly different recovery trends for gold associated with oxide and transition material were evident with recoveries being marginally higher for oxide material. Results for silver in oxide material were too scattered to determine a trend.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-2

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Flotation tests indicated that oxide material is not amenable to treatment by flotation and sulfidization did not improve the metallurgical response of this material. Flotation tests on sulphide samples produced some encouraging results for recoveries of base metals. Three tests recorded recoveries of lead to the lead rougher concentrate in excess of 85% while two indicated recoveries in excess of 70%. Apart from these tests, however, lead grades were mostly low and considerable upgrading would be required to produce a marketable lead concentrate. Recoveries of zinc to the zinc rougher concentrate were mostly modest although two tests recorded recoveries in excess of 75%. Considerable upgrading of both lead and zinc rougher concentrates are required to produce a marketable concentrate. Recoveries of gold and silver to the lead rougher concentrate were reasonable in some tests.

 

13.2 Goldcorp (2010-2015)

 

Between 2010 and 2015, Goldcorp carried out several metallurgical programs on oxide, sulphide and transition material. This work was performed by several different metallurgical testing groups including Kappes, Cassiday & Associates in Reno, NV, Blue Coast Research Metallurgy in Parksville, B.C., and Hazen Research in Golden, CO.

 

13.2.1 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (2010-2015)

 

KCA completed four separate test programs for Goldcorp between 2010 and 2015 including column leach tests, agglomeration and percolation tests, bottle roll tests and cyanide shake tests.

 

Column leach tests were performed by KCA for their programs conducted in 2010, 2012 and 2015 and the results for gold and silver recovery of these tests are summarized in Table 13-3, Table 13-4, and Table 13-5, respectively. The column tests were completed on composite samples of split core material by material types and lithologies. The 2010 program included 18 column tests on 18 different composites as directed by Goldcorp. The 2012 program included 28 column tests on 14 different composites by pit and material type. The 2015 program included 26 column tests on 13 different composites by lithology.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-3

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 13-3
KCA 2010 Column Leach Test Results on Composites

 

Composite     Crush
Size,
mm
   

 

Calculated
Head,
gms Au/t

    Extracted,
% Au
    Consumption NaCN,
kg/t
    Hydrated
Lime
Addition,
kg/t
 
1     19.0     0.33     63 %   1.30     1.01  
2     19.0     0.77     70 %   1.10     1.00  
2     9.5     0.78     73 %   1.07     1.00  
3     19.0     0.96     75 %   0.95     1.01  
4     19.0     0.37     49 %   0.95     1.00  
5     19.0     0.64     57 %   1.06     1.01  
6     19.0     0.95     67 %   1.06     1.01  
9     19.0     0.59     74 %   1.16     1.01  
9     9.5     0.61     79 %   1.34     1.01  
10     19.0     0.81     78 %   1.30     1.01  
11     19.0     0.44     36 %   1.01     1.01  
12     19.0     0.57     51 %   1.28     1.01  
16     19.0     0.60     78 %   1.08     1.01  
16     9.5     0.58     79 %   0.98     1.01  
17     19.0     0.83     80 %   0.77     1.00  
18     19.0     0.27     41 %   0.90     1.00  
Average     19     0.63     63 %   1.07     1.01  
Average     9.5     0.66     77 %   1.13     1.01  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-4

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 13-4
KCA 2012 Summary of Column Leach Test Results by Material Type

 

Description   Crush Size,
mm
  Calculated Head,
g Au/t
    Extracted,
% Au
    Calculated Head,
g Ag/t
    Extracted,
% Ag
  Calculated Tail p80
Size,mm
  Days of Leach     Consumption NaCN,
kg/t
    Addition Hydrated Lime,
kg/t
 
Composite 1, Central-Oxide   25.0   0.376     67 %   13.07     15 % 19.0   113     1.41     2.04  
Composite 1, Central-Oxide   12.5   0.390     68 %   15.37     19 % 9.19   113     1.23     2.04  
Composite 6, East-Oxide   25.0   0.573     62 %   11.20     1 % 17.8   113     1.08     2.01  
Composite 6, East-Oxide   12.5   0.527     61 %   13.62     2 % 9.04   113     1.05     2.04  
Composite 10, West-Oxide   25.0   2.031     83 %   10.74     3 % 17.8   113     0.18     2.03  
Composite 10, West-Oxide   12.5   2.130     84 %   13.24     2 % 9.47   113     0.41     2.02  
Composite 2, Central-Transition   25.0   0.484     28 %   13.14     36 % 18.5   113     0.44     2.03  
Composite 2, Central-Transition   12.5   0.482     23 %   15.03     41 % 9.75   113     0.57     2.02  
Composite 3, Central-Transition   25.0   0.484     26 %   16.98     37 % 17.9   113     0.56     2.03  
Composite 3, Central-Transition   12.5   0.479     30 %   18.26     45 % 9.37   113     0.54     2.03  
Composite 4, Central-Transition   25.0   1.448     40 %   26.62     37 % 18.5   113     0.59     2.02  
Composite 4, Central-Transition   12.5   1.263     51 %   29.05     49 % 9.19   113     0.77     2.03  
Composite 7, East-Transition   25.0   0.518     25 %   14.63     43 % 16.0   113     0.76     2.04  
Composite 7, East-Transition   12.5   0.553     15 %   16.97     46 % 8.87   113     0.67     2.04  
Composite 8, East-Transition   25.0   0.867     28 %   21.07     42 % 18.2   113     0.62     2.03  
Composite 8, East-Transition   12.5   0.821     26 %   23.74     52 % 9.25   113     0.58     2.04  
Composite 9, East-Transition   25.0   0.592     12 %   11.36     29 % 17.1   113     0.68     2.03  
Composite 9, East-Transition   12.5   0.679     9 %   11.07     33 % 8.91   113     1.00     2.03  
Composite 11, West-Transition   25.0   0.652     33 %   10.02     36 % 17.3   113     0.75     2.03  
Composite 11, West-Transition   12.5   0.658     30 %   11.17     35 % 9.26   113     0.79     2.04  
Composite 12, West-Transition   25.0   0.454     17 %   19.37     41 % 17.6   113     0.94     2.04  
Composite 12, West-Transition   12.5   0.401     18 %   19.70     41 % 9.73   113     1.30     2.04  
Composite 13, West-Transition   25.0   0.532     70 %   10.21     22 % 17.1   113     0.65     2.04  
Composite 13, West-Transition   12.5   0.575     70 %   15.46     26 % 8.38   113     0.87     2.03  
Composite 5, Central-Sulphide   25.0   0.446     8 %   8.25     11 % 17.8   113     0.86     2.02  
Composite 5, Central-Sulphide   12.5   0.410     6 %   6.42     17 % 9.56   113     0.69     2.03  
Composite 14, West-Sulphide   25.0   0.429     17 %   5.31     14 % 17.6   113     0.81     2.03  
Composite 14, West-Sulphide   12.5   0.421     18 %   4.62     18 % 9.15   113     0.64     2.04  
Average, Oxide   25.0   0.993     71 %   14.50     11 % 18.2   113     0.89     2.03  
Average, Oxide   12.5   1.016     71 %   11.67     6 % 9.2   113     0.90     2.03  
Average, Transition   25.0   0.670     31 %   17.58     38 % 17.6   113     0.67     2.03  
Average, Transition   12.5   0.657     30 %   15.93     36 % 9.2   113     0.79     2.03  
Average, Sulphide   25.0   0.438     13 %   10.94     22 % 17.7   113     0.84     2.03  
Average, Sulphide   12.5   0.416     12 %   6.78     13 % 9.4   113     0.67     2.04  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-5

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 13-5
KCA 2015 Column Leach Test Results by Lithology

 

Description   Crush
Size,
mm
    Calculated
Head,
g Au/t
    Extracted,
% Au
    Calculated
Head,
g Ag/t
    Extracted,
% Au
    Calculated
Tail p80 Size,
mm
    Days
of
Leach
    Consumption
NaCN,
kg/t
    Addition
Hydrated
Lime,
kg/t
 
HF - Ox 11   25     1.060     78 %   14.09     21 %   16.52     90     1.39     1.00  
HF - Ox 11   12.5     1.033     81 %   13.28     32 %   9.27     90     1.42     1.01  
HFT - Hi 2   25     0.834     72 %   23.67     31 %   17.71     90     1.49     1.00  
HFT - Hi 2   12.5     0.855     75 %   22.74     46 %   9.93     90     1.37     1.00  
IHT - Hi 4   25     0.812     68 %   17.90     25 %   18.29     90     1.35     1.00  
IHT - Hi 4   12.5     0.858     73 %   17.33     38 %   9.92     90     1.37     1.00  
HFT - Hi 8   25     1.095     72 %   10.51     44 %   18.32     90     1.44     1.01  
HFT - Hi 8   12.5     0.973     74 %   10.50     54 %   10.16     90     1.52     1.02  
HFT - Lo 1   25     0.817     61 %   10.91     35 %   18.06     90     1.51     0.95  
HFT - Lo 1   12.5     0.788     63 %   10.82     51 %   9.51     90     1.33     0.95  
HFT - Lo 7   25     0.880     63 %   5.32     41 %   17.58     90     1.30     0.99  
HFT - Lo 7   12.5     0.912     70 %   4.97     62 %   9.84     90     1.79     0.99  
IH - Ox 12   25     0.610     59 %   16.22     22 %   18.75     90     1.22     1.01  
IH - Ox 12   12.5     0.589     63 %   15.98     40 %   9.90     90     1.59     1.01  
IHT - Lo 3   25     0.911     57 %   23.25     33 %   18.26     90     1.47     1.01  
IHT - Lo 3   12.5     0.932     58 %   22.04     49 %   9.74     90     1.45     1.01  
OX - Ox 9   25     0.269     73 %   9.79     12 %   18.66     90     1.41     1.01  
OX - Ox 9   12.5     0.281     74 %   9.58     22 %   9.77     90     1.54     1.01  
OX - Ox 10   25     0.729     78 %   11.55     2 %   17.66     90     0.89     1.01  
OX - Ox 10   12.5     0.765     79 %   10.95     4 %   10.01     90     0.76     1.01  
PC - Ox 13   25     0.557     60 %   14.35     30 %   18.10     90     1.24     0.93  
PC - Ox 13   12.5     0.554     55 %   14.56     36 %   13.661     90     1.25     0.93  
PCT - Hi 6   25     1.069     72 %   11.87     37 %   17.64     90     1.52     1.01  
PCT - Hi 6   12.5     1.087     69 %   11.33     45 %   9.51     90     1.24     1.04  
PCT - Lo 5   25     0.922     37 %   43.26     50 %   18.19     90     1.56     1.01  
PCT - Lo 5   12.5     0.989     26 %   49.68     56 %   9.06     90     1.54     1.01  

 

The results of column testing on material crushed to 100% passing 25mm and 12.5mm, respectively, reaffirmed the conclusion that the gold is insensitive to changes in particle size with the exception of oxide and transitional material logged as hornfels and incipient hornfels, which benefitted from a 3% to 5% recovery increase for oxide material and 4% to 10% increase for transition material with finer crush size. Gold extractions for all test work completed by KCA between 2010 and 2015 ranged from 12% to 81%. Silver recoveries ranged between 4% and 62% with material classified as oxide yielding the highest recoveries.

 

Bottle roll and shake tests performed by KCA on drillhole samples during their 2014 test program yielded equivocal information about preg-robbing characteristics of the samples tested. Results from the preg-robbing test work is presented in Table 13-6 and in Figure 13-1.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-6

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 13-6
Preg-Robbing Data Comparison for Camino Rojo

 

Description     From,
meters
    To,
meters
    Average
Organic
C, %
    Average
Sulfide
S, %
    Average
Preg-
robbing, %1
    Average
Preg-
robbing, %2
    Calculated
Leach Preg-
robbing, %3
 
CR13-379DB       549.5       551       0.23       5.14       7 %     17 %     6 %
CR13-380D       749.5       751       0.11       0.01       20 %     2 %     2 %
CR13-380D       751       752.5       0.11       <0.01       13 %     5 %     1 %
CR13-390D       581       582.5       0.22       1.76       11 %     9 %     1 %
CR13-390D       582.5       584       1.86       <0.01       18 %     10 %     3 %
CR13-390D       584       585.5       0.23       1.11       20 %     10 %     0 %
CR13-390D       675.5       677       0.18       0.01       12 %     3 %     1 %
CR13-390D       677       678.5       0.05       0.01       14 %     4 %     2 %
CR13-390D       681.5       683       0.12       0.16       10 %     5 %     2 %
CR13-390D       684.5       686       0.07       0.02       13 %     4 %     2 %
CR13-390D       687.5       689       0.13       0.31       10 %     3 %     4 %
CR13-390D       689       690.5       0.11       2.42       7 %     13 %     10 %
CR13-400D       421.5       423       0.65       4.45       40 %     40 %     16 %
CR13-400D       423       424.5       0.28       0.43       37 %     16 %     3 %
CR13-400D       424.5       426       0.27       0.27       34 %     20 %     3 %
CR13-410DB       19.5       21       0.06       0.01       6 %     12 %     4 %
CR13-410DB       67.5       69       0.10       0.01       6 %     10 %     3 %
CR13-410DB       175.5       177       0.12       <0.01       18 %     11 %     8 %
CR13-410DB       193.5       195       0.11       <0.01       9 %     3 %     5 %
CR13-410DB       195       196.5       0.17       0.78       30 %     15 %     14 %
CR13-410DB       196.5       198       0.11       0.19       26 %     25 %     22 %
CR13-418D       33.5       35       0.04       0.01       2 %     1 %     4 %
CR13-418D       63.5       65       0.03       0.03       2 %     3 %     4 %
CR13-418D       72.5       74       0.07       <0.01       10 %     7 %     2 %
CR13-418D       77       78.5       0.04       <0.01       17 %     4 %     4 %
CR13-418D       98       99.5       0.07       <0.01       4 %     3 %     6 %
CR13-418D       134       135.5       0.04       0.01       9 %     4 %     5 %
CR13-419D       40.5       42       0.02       0.02       5 %     5 %     2 %
CR13-419D       84       85.5       0.02       <0.01       18 %     6 %     1 %
CR13-419D       96       97.5       0.02       <0.01       13 %     4 %     5 %
CR13-466D       639.5       641       0.04       <0.01       10 %     3 %     1 %
CR13-466D       647       648.5       0.09       0.09       14 %     3 %     7 %
CR13-466D       648.5       650       0.08       <0.01       13 %     2 %     0 %
CR13-466D       675.5       677       0.14       2.90       12 %     4 %     6 %

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-7

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 13-1
Preg-Robbing Percentage vs. CIL and Direct Bottle Roll Leach Test Recoveries

 

Calculated leach preg-robbing values based on the difference between CIL and direct bottle roll test recoveries ranged from 0% to 22%. Based on KCA’s experience, a difference greater than 3% indicates the material could be preg-robbing.

 

Preg-robbing test work performed on the head material did not prove to be an indication of preg-robbing during leaching. Samples that exhibited preg-robbing characteristics during the preg-robbing test work did not necessarily show the same characteristics during direct and CIL bottle roll leach tests. Additionally, no one individual drill hole exhibited any more tendency toward preg-robbing than another. No strong correlations were observed between sulphide sulphur content and off-rob values, or between organic carbon content and preg-rob values as shown in Figure 13-2 and Figure 13-3, respectively. The bottle roll tests also did not show a strong correlation between percent gold recovery and sulphide content, as shown in Figure 13-4.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-8

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 13-2
Preg-Robbing from Leach Percentage vs. Sulphide Content

 

 

Figure 13-3
Preg-Robbing from Leach Percentage vs. Organic Carbon Content

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-9

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Figure 13-4
Preg-Robbing from Leach Percentage vs. Organic Carbon Content

 

13.2.2 Blue Coast Research Metallurgy (2012-2013)

 

A test work program was undertaken in 2012/2013 at Blue Coast Research Metallurgy (“Blue Coast Research”) in Parksville, B.C. This program consisted of a variability study, a small gravity program, and a flotation flowsheet development component (Blue Coast Research Ltd., 2014). Tests were completed using four samples selected from the Represa transition to obtain information from a high oxidation and low oxidation sample from both the west and east zones of the deposit.

 

The variability program subjected 98 samples to small-scale bench flotation, small-scale leach testing, and small-scale gravity recovery tests. Flotation flowsheet development testing was conducted on three bulk sulphide composites: one from the Represa zone and two from the West Extension.

 

Blue Coast Research performed nine single-pass gravity recoverable gold (“GRG”) tests on different samples from various locations in the Camino Rojo deposit, both in the Represa and in the West Extension areas. A single extended GRG test was performed on a sulphide sample from the West Extension (WE MC1). The results of these tests demonstrated gold recoveries greater than 20% at nominal primary grind feed sizes with mass pulls averaging 2%. These results suggest that concentration of gold by an initial gravity process is a viable option. No subsequent gravity work has been conducted to date.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-10

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Very little transitional material was tested at Blue Coast Research; the majority of the test work completed was performed on sulphide material from the ‘West Extension’. Flowsheet development work conducted at Blue Coast Research formed the basis for understanding the processing options for the Camino Rojo sulphide deposit.

 

A full mineralogical analysis was performed on several samples during this study. The results of the QEMSCAN sulphide mineralogy indicated that the sphalerite was relatively coarse-grained, being well-liberated (having a 40% release size) well above 100 microns. Galena appeared finer-grained, being well-liberated at 90 microns.

 

Gold mineralogy was undertaken using both optical and D-SIMS techniques. Results indicated that gold was significantly linked to both pyrite and arsenopyrite. Higher gold values were associated with higher arsenic values.

 

Results from the Blue Coast Research Tests are presented in Table 13-7 through 13-9.

 

Table 13-7
Summary of Flotation Composite Feed Grades

 

Composite     Au (g/t)     Ag (g/t)     Zn%     Pb%  
  WE MC1       1.19       10.8       0.31       0.10  
  WE MC2       0.89       8.6       0.26       0.08  

 

Table 13-8
Lead Flotation Concentrate Grades

 

Composite   Au (g/t)     Ag (g/t)     Zn%     Pb%  
WE MC1     185       2062       0.3       28.00  
WE MC2     236       2094       9       36  

 

Table 13-9
Zinc Flotation Concentrate Grades

 

Composite     Au (g/t)     Ag (g/t)     Zn%     Pb%  
  WE MC1       17       112       41       0.50  
  WE MC2       9       125       43       0.7  

 

13.2.3 Hazen Research (2014)

 

Hazen Research was commissioned to conduct grinding, flotation, and cyanide leaching studies of sulphide and transitional material. Some 112 composites were tested. Standard flotation methods yielded recoveries of ~90% Au, 74% to 81% Ag, 83% to 90% Zn, and 82% to 91% Pb for sulphide material, and recoveries of 60% to 67% Au, 56% to 63% Ag, 35% Zn, and 48% Pb for transition material (Hazen Research Inc., 2014).

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-11

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

13.2.4 Comminution Testing

 

Comminution testing occurred at SGS Vancouver in 2015 (SGS Canada Inc., 2015). Material for testing was sourced from the Camino Rojo site directly as well as from an existing stockpile of samples being stored at Hazen. From these two sources, a total of 23 half HQ composites and 2 full PQ composites were selected for testing. The HQ samples were selected based on 4 spatial quadrants, alteration, and oxidation. The PQ samples were selected based on their respective oxidation levels which included one near sulphide composite and one highly oxidized composite. JK Drop Weight, SMC, Abrasion Index, Crusher Work Index, Bond Ball Work Index, Bond Rod Work Index, SPI, Point Load Index, and Unconfined Compressive Strength tests were performed. It should be noted that only two relevant crusher work indices were obtained from testing data as shown in the summary of results in Table 13-10 below.

 

Table 13-10
Comminution Test Results Summary

 

    Axb     SPI
(min)
    Ai (g)     CWi* (kWh/t)     BWi (kWh/t)     RWi (kWh/t)     UCS* (kN)     IS50
(Mpa)
 
Mean     38.9       99.8       0.123               14.4       15.9               7.48  
Min     25.6       34.4       0.017       9.4       8.5       10.8       251.3       3.82  
Max     68.2       145.9       0.276       10.5       19.4       19.3       522.3       15.35  
RSD%     21.8       29.2       73.7               21.2       15.0               43.9  

 

Additionally, comminution results are provided by alteration type in Table 13-11. These alterations are: Pyrite-Carbonate (PC), Incipient Potassic Hornfels (IH), and Potassic Hornfels (HF). As indicated in the table, “S” represents Sulphide and “T” represents Transition.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-12

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 13-11
Comminution Test Results by Alteration Type
 

 

    Axb     SPI
(min)
    Ai (g)     BWi (kWh/t)     RWi (kWh/t)     IS50
(Mpa)
 
PC (S)     41.6       93.0       0.061       12.8       14.4       6.07  
PC (T)     50.5       57.2       0.024       9.6       12.1       4.78  
IH (S)     29.7       141.2       0.136       16.8       18.6       7.93  
IH (T)     40.7       92.0       0.061       13.2       15.3       5.18  
HF (S)     32.1       120.1       0.233       17.6       18.2       13.46  
HF (T)     39.1       99.4       0.200       16.2       16.7       6.89  

 

13.3 Conclusions from Metallurgical Programs

 

Based on data from the historical test work completed to date, key design parameters including metal recoveries, reagent consumptions, and other process design criteria items have been assigned for use in this study and are discussed in the following sections. Metallurgical samples were taken from drill core and are geographically representative of the majority of the oxide and transition resources. Future test programs should be performed to confirm or refine these results as part of future studies, especially with regards to the Ki material type which only has limited data available.

 

For this study, the three basic material types considered in the historical test work to date, Oxide, Sulphide, and Transition, have been further defined into distinct groups beyond the basic classifications. Oxide material has been classified relative to the material’s K alteration values from ICP testing and include the Kp (pervasive) and Ki (incipient) oxides. Transition material has been classified based on oxidation level via qualitative indicators which include Transition-Hi (60 to 90% oxidized), Transition-Lo (30 to 60% oxidized), and Transition-S (Sulphide, <30% oxidized). For the current PEA, only the Oxides, Transition-Hi and Transition-Lo groups are being considered.

 

13.3.1 Crush Size and Recovery

 

The column leach recovery by crush size was analyzed to determine the effect of crush size on recovery for the Oxide and Transition groups. Column tests were conducted on crushed product sizes ranging from a P80 of 7mm to a P80 of nearly 20mm (P80 sizes were estimated for the SGS data set). These data were aggregated and plotted against recoveries for both gold and silver for each material classification type. Trend lines were then used to establish projected recoveries for P80 sizes above 20mm. Crushed product size vs. recovery results are presented in Figure 13-5 and Figure 13-6 for Oxide and Transition material types, respectively.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-13

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 13-5
Oxide Recovery vs. Crush Size

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-14

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

 

Figure 13-6
Transition Recovery vs. Crush Size

 

Based on the data available, gold recoveries for Kp Oxide material appear to decrease slightly as crush size increases while silver recoveries, depending on the data set (SGS or KCA) are relatively flat regardless of crush size. Gold recoveries for Ki Oxide material increased incrementally as crush size increased, while silver recoveries decreased with increased crush size.

 

With respect to the Transition-Hi material type, both gold and silver recoveries decreased with increased crush size. Recoveries for the Transition-Lo material varied over the crush size range with gold recoveries trending up with increased crush size and silver recoveries trending down with increased crush size.

 

Results for the column test programs were extrapolated to evaluate the expected metal recoveries at different crush sizes. From the extrapolated data, there is very little change in gold recoveries at coarser crush sizes. Projected gold recoveries ranged between 74% at P80 19mm to 71% at P80 50mm for Kp Oxides and from 60% to 61% for Ki Oxides. Projected silver recoveries ranged between 17% to 16% and 27% to 3% for Kp and Ki Oxides, respectively. Gold recoveries for Transition material ranged from 66% at P80 19mm to 61% at P80 50mm for Transition-hi material and from 47% to 53% for Transition-lo material. Silver recoveries ranged from 32% to 15% for Transition-hi material and from 35% to 18% for Transition-lo material.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-15

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Based on the data available, KCA recommends a crushed product size of 80% passing 38mm in order to minimize crushing requirements and recover most of the recoverable silver. Estimated recoveries by material type at P80 38mm, including a 2% field deduction for gold and 3% field deduction for silver, are presented in Table 13-12.

 

Table 13-12
Estimated Recoveries by Material Type for P80 38mm Crush Size

 

Material Type   Au     Ag  
Kp Oxide     70 %     13 %
Ki Oxide     58 %     20 %
Transition-hi     60 %     17 %
Transition-lo     49 %     20 %

 

Additional column tests at coarser crush sizes should be considered as part of future test programs.

 

13.3.2 Leach Cycle

 

The Camino Rojo leach cycle has been estimated based on the column test work completed to date by evaluating the leach curves for gold and silver. The leach cycle considers tonnes of solution per tonne of material as well as total time required to reach the ultimate recovery in the column leach tests. Based on this data, the estimated leach cycle for the Camino Rojo material is 80 days.

 

13.3.3 Reagent Consumption Projection

 

13.3.3.1 Cyanide

 

The column leach test cyanide consumptions were studied and discounted appropriately to provide a basis for the expected field cyanide consumptions. The projected field consumptions by material type are shown in the Table 13-13.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-16

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 13-13
Projected Field Cyanide Consumptions by Material Type

 

Material Type   NaCN Cons. kg/t  
Kp avg ox     0.325  
Ki avg ox     0.398  
Trans-lo avg     0.334  
Trans-hi avg     0.352  
Avg., All     0.331  

 

For the purposes of this study, an average projected NaCN consumption of 0.35 kg/t of material has been selected.

 

13.3.3.2 Lime

 

Lime is required for pH control during leaching. Because hydrated lime was utilized in the lab leach tests, the laboratory lime consumptions are adjusted to accurately predict consumptions of quicklime in the field. Estimated quicklime consumptions by material type are presented in

 

Table 13-14.

 

Table 13-14
Projected Field Lime Consumptions by Material Type

 

Material Type   Quicklime Cons. kg/t  
Kp avg ox     1.080  
Ki avg ox     0.864  
Trans-lo avg     1.179  
Trans-hi avg     1.297  
Avg. All     1.105  

 

To ensure that proper pH is maintained throughout the heap, a lime consumption of 1.25 kg/t of material has been selected.

 

13.3.4 Conclusions and Key Design Parameters

 

There has been a significant amount of test work completed to date on representative samples from documented drill holes with good spatial distribution in the proposed pit. Based on the metallurgical data available, the Camino Rojo deposit shows significant variability in gold recoveries based on material type and geological domain with preg-robbing organic carbon being the only significant deleterious element identified. In general, recoveries for oxide material are good and will yield acceptable results using conventional heap leaching methods with cyanide. Recoveries for transition material and sulphides are significantly lower compared with the oxide material for conventional leaching with some areas of transition showing reasonably high recoveries. Reagent consumptions for all material types were reasonably low as described above.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-17

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

Preg-robbing presents a low to moderate risk to the overall project and should be further investigated. Future test work should include preg-robbing tests at intervals in order to identify / quantify material with preg-robbing characteristics.

 

Key design parameters from the metallurgical test work are summarized below:

 

· Crush size of 80% passing 38mm.

 

· Estimated gold recoveries (including 2% field deduction) of:

 

o 70% for Kp Oxide;

 

o 58% for Ki Oxide;

 

o 60% for Transition-hi; and

 

o 49% for Transition-lo.

 

· Estimated silver recoveries (including 3% field deduction) of:

 

o 13% for Kp Oxide;

 

o 20% for Ki Oxide;

 

o 17% for Transition-hi; and

 

o 20% for Transition-lo.

 

· Design leach cycle of 80 days.

 

· Average cyanide consumption of 0.35 kg/t material.

 

· Average lime consumption of 1.25 kg/t material.

 

Additional column leach tests should be conducted to confirm recoveries at coarser crush sizes, especially for the Ki material type which has very little data available, in an effort to mitigate any associated risk.

 

13.4 Sulphide Mineralization Discussion

 

Metallurgical testing on sulphide mineralization has demonstrated that gold, silver, lead and zinc can be recovered into concentrates that are of potentially marketable grade.

 

A possible process flowsheet for the sulphide resource is a sequential flotation process consisting of an initial pre-flotation to remove organic carbon followed by lead flotation, zinc flotation, and pyrite/arsenopyrite flotation to recover additional precious metals. The pyrite/arsenopyrite concentrate would be oxidized to recover additional gold and silver by cyanide leaching. Payable products would be the Lead Concentrate, Zinc Concentrate, and Gold Silver doré recovered from the cyanide leaching of the pyrite/arsenopyrite concentrate. It is assumed that after oxidation 90% of the gold and silver can be recovered from the oxidized pyrite concentrate. Waste products would be the pre-flotation concentrate, the flotation tailings, and the leached residue of the pyrite/arsenopyrite concentrate.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-18

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 13-15 presents the distribution of metals to the various products based on preliminary test work.

 

Note that these numbers are only presented to provide guidance as to whether material is potentially a resource. The process flowsheet described above is based on commonly used metal recovery methods and the metallurgical test work to date is too preliminary to confirm these recoveries can be achieved or to determine the economic viability of the material.

 

Table 13-15
Distribution of Metals to Various Sulphide Products

 

          Distribution %  
Product   Wt %     Pb     Zn     Au     Ag  
Flotation Feed     100       100       100       100       100  
Lead Concentrate     0.3       60       1       49       44  
Zinc Concentrate     0.6       1       64       2       7  
Pyrite Concentrate     19.6       (15 )     (19 )     (39 )     (28 )
Dore from leaching Pyrite Con     NA       NA       NA       35       25  
                                         
Total Recovery for resource estimate             60 %     64 %     86 %     76 %
                                         
Preflotation Concentrate     4.4       14       6       6       16  
Pyrite Leach Residue     19.6       15       19       4       3  
Flotation Tailings     75.1       10       10       4       5  

Note: Based on preliminary testwork.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 13-19

 

  

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

14.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES

 

14.1 Mineral Resource

 

Table 14-1 presents the mineral resource for the Camino Rojo Project. Measured and indicated mineral resources amount to 354.9 million tonnes at 0.845 g/t gold, 8.97 g/t silver, 0.11% lead, and 0.29% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 9.6 million ounces gold, 102.4 million ounces of silver, 857.8 million pounds of lead, and 2.27 billion pounds of zinc. Inferred mineral resource is an additional 65.2 million tonnes at 0.867 g/t gold, 7.73 g/t silver, 0.05% lead, and 0.23% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 1.8 million ounces of gold, 16.2 million ounces of silver, 75.2 million pounds of lead, and 336.8 million pounds of zinc for the inferred mineral resource.

 

The mineral resource includes potential heap leach resource and potential mill resources. For the leach resource, measured and indicated mineral resources amount to 100.8 million tonnes at 0.734 g/t gold, 12.67 g/t silver, 0.21% lead, and 0.37% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 2.38 million ounces gold, 41.1 million ounces of silver, 455.8 million pounds of lead, and 814.8 million pounds of zinc. Inferred mineral resource is an additional 4.9 million tonnes at 0.772 g/t gold, 5.60 g/t silver, 0.07% lead, and 0.24% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 120,600 ounces of gold, 874,000 ounces of silver, 7.0 million pounds of lead, and 25.9 million pounds of zinc for the inferred mineral resource. The leach resources are oxide dominant and are the emphasis of this PEA study.

 

For the mill resource, measured and indicated mineral resources amount to 254.1 million tonnes at 0.889 g/t gold, 7.50 g/t silver, 0.07% lead, and 0.26% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 7.3 million ounces gold, 61.3 million ounces of silver, 402.0 million pounds of lead, and 1.46 billion pounds of zinc. Inferred mineral resource is an additional 60.3 million tonnes at 0.875 g/t gold, 7.90 g/t silver, 0.05% lead, and 0.23% zinc. Contained metal amounts to 1.7 million ounces of gold, 15.3 million ounces of silver, 68.1 million pounds of lead, and 310.8 million pounds of zinc for the inferred mineral resource.

 

Note that silver, lead, and zinc grades tend to be significantly higher in the leach resource than the mill resource.

 

The mineral resources are based on a block model developed by IMC during March and April 2018.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 14-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The mineral resources are contained within a floating cone pit shell to demonstrate “reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction” as required by NI 43-101. Figure 14-1 shows the shell. Measured, indicated, and inferred mineral resources were allowed to contribute to the economics for the mineral resource cone shell.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 14-2

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 14-1
Mineral Resource

 

    NSR Cog           NSR     Gold     Silver     Lead     Zinc     Gold     Silver     Lead     Zinc  
Resource Type   ($/t)     Kt     ($/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     (%)     (%)     (koz)     (koz)     (mlb)     (mlb)  
Leach Resource:                                                                                        
Measured Mineral Resource     5.06       16,147       23.65       0.794       15.44       0.26       0.39       412.1       8,014       92.1       140.6  
Indicated Mineral Resource     5.06       84,692       20.07       0.723       12.15       0.19       0.36       1,969.3       33,076       363.7       674.3  
Meas/Ind Mineral Resource     5.06       100,839       20.64       0.734       12.67       0.21       0.37       2,381.3       41,091       455.8       814.8  
Inferred Mineral Resource     5.06       4,858       18.13       0.772       5.60       0.07       0.24       120.6       874       7.0       25.9  
                                                                                         
Mill Resource:                                                                                        
Measured Mineral Resource     13.72       9,818       39.27       0.864       7.45       0.08       0.28       272.6       2,352       16.4       60.1  
Indicated Mineral Resource     13.72       244,251       39.98       0.890       7.50       0.07       0.26       6,992.2       58,934       385.6       1,398.2  
Meas/Ind Mineral Resource     13.72       254,069       39.95       0.889       7.50       0.07       0.26       7,264.8       61,286       402.0       1,458.3  
Inferred Mineral Resource     13.72       60,342       39.04       0.875       7.90       0.05       0.23       1,696.9       15,334       68.1       310.8  
                                                                                         
Total Mineral Resource                                                                                        
Measured Mineral Resource             25,965       29.55       0.820       12.42       0.19       0.35       684.6       10,367       108.5       200.7  
Indicated Mineral Resource             328,943       34.86       0.847       8.70       0.10       0.29       8,961.5       92,010       749.3       2,072.5  
Meas/Ind Mineral Resource             354,908       34.47       0.845       8.97       0.11       0.29       9,646.1       102,377       857.8       2,273.2  
Inferred Mineral Resource             65,200       37.49       0.867       7.73       0.05       0.23       1,817.5       16,208       75.2       336.8  

 

Notes:

 

1. The mineral resource is effective as of April 27, 2018.

2. Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding.

3. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

4. Mineral resources for leach material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold and $20/oz silver.

5. Mineral resources for mill material are based on prices of $1400/oz gold, $20/oz silver, $1.05/lb lead, and $1.25/lb zinc.

6. Mineral resources are based on NSR cut-off grades of $5.06/t for leach material and $13.72/t for mill material.

7. NSR value for leach material is as follows:

Kp Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 30.77 x gold (g/t) + 0.080 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 70% and silver recovery of 13% 

Ki Oxide: NSR ($/t) = 25.49 x gold (g/t) + 0.123 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 58% and silver recovery of 20%

Tran-Hi: NSR ($/t) = 26.37 x gold (g/t) + 0.104 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 60% and silver recovery of 17% 

Tran-Lo: NSR ($/t) = 21.54 x gold (g/t) + 0.123 x silver (g/t), based on gold recovery of 49% and silver recovery of 20%

8. NSR value for mill material is 36.75 x gold (g/t) + 0.429 x silver (g/t) + 10.75 x lead (%) + 12.37 x zinc (%), based on recoveries of 86% gold, 76% silver, 60% lead, and 64% zinc.

9. Table 14-2 accompanies this Mineral Resource statement and shows all relevant parameters.

10. The mineral resource estimate assumes that the floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto land held by the Adjacent Owner. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 14-3

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

14.1.1 Metal Prices for Mineral Resources

 

Table 14-2 shows the economic and recovery parameters for the mineral resource estimate. Metal prices are based on the three year backward average price plus 12% to 17.6% as follows:

 

    3 Year              
Metal   Average Price     Resource     %Increase  
Gold   $ 1250     $ 1400       12.0 %
                         
Silver   $ 17     $ 20       17.6 %
                         
Lead   $ 0.92     $ 1.05       14.1 %
                         
Zinc   $ 1.08     $ 1.25       15.7 %

 

The three year backward average is used as a benchmark by the US Security Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

 

14.1.2 Cost and Recovery Estimates for Mineral Resources

 

The mining cost is estimated at $1.65 per total tonne. This was estimated by IMC and is based on owner operation of the mining fleet.

 

Table 14-2 shows parameters for six material types. Note that costs used for the resource estimation vary somewhat from the costs estimated in the PEA because the resource was done earlier and the PEA does not consider the sulphide material. The costs used in the resource estimation were only used to demonstrate “reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction”. For the first four materials, Kp Oxide, Ki Oxide, Transitional High Oxide, and Transitional Low Oxide, it is assumed that processing will be by crushing and heap leaching. The processing and G&A costs of $3.38 and $1.69 per processed tonne respectively were provided by KCA and are based on a process production rate of 18,000 tonnes per day or about 6.57 million tonnes per year. KCA also provided the recovery estimates for gold and silver shown on the table.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 14-4

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

IMC assumed 100% refinery payables for this case. The gold and silver refining costs are also IMC estimates. The leach material is also subject to a 2% NSR royalty. Lead and zinc do not contribute to economics for leach material.

 

Due to two products, and also variable recoveries by material type, a gold equivalent grade or NSR value will be needed to tabulate proposed quantities of mineralized material. The gold and silver NSR factors for Kp Oxide are calculated as follows:

 

Gold NSR Factor = ($1400 – $5.00) x 0.70 x 1.00 x 0.98 / 31.103 = $30.768

 

Silver NSR Factor = ($20 – $0.50) x 0.13 x 1.00 x 0.98 / 31.103 = $0.0799

 

The units are US$ per gram per tonne. The 0.98 term is for the royalty.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 14-5

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 14-2
Economic Parameters for Mineral Resource Estimate

 

 

Material Type   Units   Kp Oxide     Ki Oxide     Tran-Hi     Tran-Low     Tran-S     Sulfide     Waste  
Commodity Prices                                                            
Gold Price Per Ounce   (US$)     1400       1400       1400       1400       1400       1400          
Silver Price Per Ounce   (US$)     20.00       20.00       20.00       20.00       20.00       20.00          
Lead Price Per Pound   (US$)     1.05       1.05       1.05       1.05       1.05       1.05          
Zinc Price Per Pound   (US$)     1.25       1.25       1.25       1.25       1.25       1.25          
Plant Production Rate   (ktpy)     6,570       6,570       6,570       6,570       9,125       9,125          
Mining Cost Per Tonne                                                            
Total Mining Cost   (US$)     1.65       1.65       1.65       1.65       1.65       1.65       1.65  
Process and G&A Cost Per Ore Tonne                                                            
Processing   (US$)     3.377       3.377       3.377       3.377       12.50       12.50          
G&A   (US$)     1.687       1.687       1.687       1.687       1.215       1.215          
Total Process and G&A   (US$)     5.064       5.064       5.064       5.064       13.72       13.72          
Plant Recovery                                                            
Gold   (%)     70 %     58 %     60 %     49 %     86 %     86 %        
Silver   (%)     13 %     20 %     17 %     20 %     76 %     76 %        
Lead   (%)     0 %     0 %     0 %     0 %     60 %     60 %        
Zinc   (%)     0 %     0 %     0 %     0 %     64 %     64 %        
Smelting/Refining Payables and Costs                                                            
Gold Refinery Payable   (%)     100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %     95 %     95 %        
Silver Refinery Payable   (%)     100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %     95 %     95 %        
Lead Smelter Payable   (%)     0 %     0 %     0 %     0 %     95 %     95 %        
Zinc Smelter Payable   (%)     0 %     0 %     0 %     0 %     85 %     85 %        
Gold Refining Per Ounce   (US$)     5.00       5.00       5.00       5.00       1.00       1.00          
Silver Refining Per Ounce   (US$)     0.50       0.50       0.50       0.50       1.50       1.50          
Lead Treatment Per Pound   (US$)     0.00       0.00       0.00       0.00       0.194       0.194          
Zinc Treatment Per Pound   (US$)     0.00       0.00       0.00       0.00       0.219       0.219          
Royalties                                                            
Royalty   (%)     2 %     2 %     2 %     2 %     0 %     0 %        
NSR Factors                                                            
Gold NSR Factor   ($/g)     30.768       25.493       26.372       21.537       36.748       36.748          
Silver NSR Factor   ($/g)     0.0799       0.1229       0.1044       0.1229       0.4294       0.4294          
Lead NSR Factor   ($/%)     0.00       0.00       0.00       0.00       10.753       10.753          
Zinc NSR Factor   ($/%)     0.00       0.00       0.00       0.00       12.369       12.369          
NSR Cutoff Grades                                                            
Breakeven NSR Cutoff Grade   ($/t)     6.71       6.71       6.71       6.71       15.37       15.37          
Internal NSR Cutoff Grade   ($/t)     5.06       5.06       5.06       5.06       13.72       13.72          
Gold Equivalent Cutoff Grades                                                            
Breakeven Cutoff Grade   (g/t)     0.22       0.26       0.25       0.31       0.42       0.42          
Internal Cutoff Grade   (g/t)     0.16       0.20       0.19       0.24       0.37       0.37          

 

Note: Economic parameters used for the mineral resource vary slightly from the PEA economic model as they were done before the final economic analysis.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 14-6

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The NSR value for a block is calculated as:

 

NSR = $30.768 x gold + $0.0799 x silver

 

The breakeven NSR cutoff is $6.71, the mining + process + G&A cost per tonne. The internal NSR cutoff grade is $5.06 per tonne, the process + G&A cost. Internal cutoff applies to blocks that have to be removed from the pit, so mining is a sunk cost. Note the NSR cutoff does not vary by material type for the heap leach materials, so is convenient for mine planning and scheduling.

 

Breakeven and internal gold or gold equivalent cutoff grades can be calculated by dividing the NSR cutoff grades by the gold NSR factor shown on the table. For Kp Oxide the breakeven gold equivalent cutoff grade is $6.71/$30.768 or 0.22 g/t. The internal cutoff grade is $5.06/$30.768 or 0.16 g/t.

 

Also, for Kp Oxide, the silver divisor is $30.768/$0.0799 = 385.1, and

 

Gold Equivalent = Gold + Silver / 385.1

 

The cutoff grades for the other material types are also shown on the table.

 

14.1.3 Parameters for Mill Material

 

The process cost for the Transition Sulphide and Sulphide material types is estimated at $12.50 per tonne based on grinding and differential flotation to produce a lead, zinc, and a pyrite concentrate. The plant production rate is assumed to be 25,000 tpd or 9.12 million tonnes per year. The overall recoveries for gold and silver are based on the oxidation and cyanide leaching of the pyrite concentrate. The cost for this is included in the process cost estimate. It is assumed the lead and zinc will be recovered as concentrates that will be shipped to conventional smelters. Preliminary estimates of plant recoveries for gold, silver, lead, and zinc are shown on the table.

 

Table 14-3 shows typical treatment terms for lead and zinc concentrates, and is the basis for the payable amounts of lead and zinc and treatment charges shown in Table 14-2. Typical concentrate grades are assumed for the calculation but more testing is required.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 14-7

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The NSR factors for each metal are shown on the table and are calculated as follows:

 

Gold NSR Factor = ($1400 – $1.00) x 0.86 x 0.95 / 31.103 = $36.748

 

Silver NSR Factor = ($20 – $1.50) x 0.76 x 0.95 / 31.103 = $0.4294

 

Lead NSR Factor = ($1.05 - $0.194) x 0.60 x 0.95 x 22.046 = $10.753

 

Zinc NSR Factor = ($1.25 - $0.219) x 0.64 x 0.85 x 22.046 = $12.369

 

Table 14-3
Treatment Costs for Lead and Zinc Concentrates

 

Parameter   Units   Lead     Zinc  
Concentrate Grade   (%)     60 %     53 %
Moisture Content   (%)     8.5 %     8.5 %
Concentrate Loss   (%)     0.0 %     0.0 %
Payable Percentage   (%)     95 %     85 %
Payable Lbs/Tonne   (lbs)     1,257       993  
Treatment Cost Per DMT   (US$)     217.00       190.00  
Freight Per WMT   (US$)     25.00       25.00  
Treatment Cost Per Pound   (US$)     0.173       0.191  
Transport Cost Per Pound   (US$)     0.022       0.027  
Total Cost Per Pound   (US$)     0.194       0.219  

 

Total NSR is calculated by multiplying each factor times the mineral grade; the lead and zinc grades are assumed to be in percent (ppm/10000). The breakeven NSR cutoff grade is US$15.37 per tonne; internal NSR cutoff is US$13.72 per tonne. The mineral resources on Table 14-1 are based on internal NSR cutoff grades for all material types. There are no royalties applied to the mill material.

 

14.1.4 Additional Information

 

The mineral resources are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) “CIM Definition Standards – For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” adopted by the CIM Council (as amended, the “CIM Definition Standards”) in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101. Mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates reflect the reasonable expectation that all necessary permits and approvals will be obtained and maintained.

 

There is no guarantee that any of the mineral resources will be converted to mineral reserve. The inferred mineral resources included in this Technical Report meet the current definition of inferred mineral resources. The quantity and grade of inferred mineral resources are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these inferred mineral resources as an indicated mineral resource. It is, however, expected that the majority of inferred mineral resource could be upgraded to indicated mineral resource with continued exploration.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 14-8

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

IMC does not believe that there are significant risks to the mineral resource estimates based on environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, or political factors. The project is in a jurisdiction friendly to mining. The most significant risks to the mineral resource are related to economic parameters such as prices lower than forecast, recoveries lower than forecast, or costs higher than the current estimates.

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by the Adjacent Owner and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner. The mineral resource estimate has been prepared based on the Qualified Person’s reasoned judgment, in accordance with CIM Best Practices Guidelines and his professional standards of competence, that there is a reasonable expectation that all necessary permits, agreements and approvals will be obtained and maintained, including an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to allow mining of waste material on its mineral concessions. In particular, in considering the prospects for eventual economic extraction, consideration was given to industry practice, including the past practices of the Adjacent Owner in entering similar agreements on commercially reasonable terms, and a timeframe of 10-15 years.

 

Delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the PEA, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. There can be no assurance that Orla will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to Orla or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 14-9

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-1
Mineral Resource Cone Shell, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 14-10

 

    

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

14.2 Description of the Block Model

 

14.2.1 General

 

The Camino Rojo mineral resource is based on a block model developed by IMC during March and April 2018. The model is based on 10m by 10m by 10m high blocks. The model is not rotated.

 

14.2.2 Geologic Controls

 

Orla personnel developed various geologic solids as follows:

 

· Solids for the Caracol, Indidura, and post mineral lithologic units.

 

· Solids to represent higher and lower amounts of potassium alteration in the Caracol Formation; these were termed Potassium Pervasive (Kp) and Potassium Incipient (Ki) alteration zones.

 

· Solids to represent several levels of oxidation.

 

· Also a solid interpretation of a dike that runs through the deposit from southwest to northeast.

 

IMC reviewed these solids and incorporated them in the model. The lithology model, variable “lith”, is defined as follows:

 

Table 14-4
Camino Rojo Model Rock Types (lith)

 

Rock Code Units Description
10 PM Post Mineral
20 Car Caracol
30 Ind Indidura

 

The lithology code was assigned to the nearest whole block, i.e. the block was assigned if more than 50% of the block was inside the solid. Figure 14-2 shows the drillhole locations and the location of cross sections referenced in this section. Figure 14-3 shows the lithology on Section L112 along the long axis of the deposit (southwest to northeast). The Caracol unit is the main resource host.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-11

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 The main control for grade estimation in the Caracol unit is based on the level of potassium alteration and is based on geologic logging and ICP assays of potassium.

 

The alteration model, variable “alt” is defined as follows:

Table 14-5
Camino Rojo Alteration Types (alt)

 

Alteration Code Alteration Description
10 Kp Caracol_P (Potassium Pervasive)
20 Ki Caracol_I (Potassium Incipient)
30 Ind Indidura

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-12

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

 

Figure 14-2
Hole and Cross Section Locations, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-13

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

 

Figure 14-3
Lithology on Section L112, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-14

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

The Kp (Potassium Pervasive) alteration tends to be pervasive potassium flooding and potassium content in ICP results and are consistently above 3% throughout the zone. It is efficient in defining the area of higher gold assays. The Ki (Potassium Incipient) alteration has potassium flooding localized in bands associated with structures and potassium in ICP results are variable, with the altered portions having greater than 3% and the unaltered <1 to 3% potassium. Figure 14-4 through 14-6 are sections of the alteration. Figure 14-4 is long Section L112. Figure 14-5 and Figure 14-6 are in the southwest and northeast portions of the deposit respectively. Note also that the Indidura “alteration zone” identifies the relatively well drilled portion of the Indidura Formation.

  

The oxide model, variable “oxide” is defined as follows:

 

Table 14-6
Camino Rojo Oxide-Sulphide Model (oxide)

 

Oxide Code Type Description
10 Ox Oxide
20 TrH Transition 60-90% Oxide
30 TrL Transition 30-60% Oxide
40 TrS Transition 10-30% Oxide
50 Slf Sulphide

 

The solids were developed based on % oxide in the drillhole database as logged by Goldcorp. Orla geologists logged holes on several sections to verify the Goldcorp loggings. Figure 14-7 shows a cross section of the oxide model in the northeast portion of the deposit. The southwest portion of the deposit is mostly sulphide.

 

In addition to the above geologic controls, IMC also included a domain code in the model. This was due to perceived differences in the orientation of the mineralization in the higher elevation northeast portion of the Caracol versus the deeper southwest portion. These are described in Table 14-7. Figure 14-8 shows a long section of the domains.

 

Table 14-7
Camino Rojo Estimation Domains (domain)

 

Domain Code Domain Description
1 NE Northeast Area Kp and Ki
2 SW Southwest Area Kp and Ki
3 Ind Indidura

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-15

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 Figure 14-4
Alteration on Section L112, IMC 2018

   

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-16

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

  

Figure 14-5
Alteration on Section 18, IMC 2018

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-17

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

  

Figure 14-6
Alteration on Section 29, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-18

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 


 

Figure 14-7
Oxidation Zones on Section 29, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-19

 

  

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

 

Figure 14-8
Estimation Domains on Section L112, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-20

 

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

14.2.3 Cap Grades and Compositing

 

IMC reviewed the distribution of assays for gold, silver, lead, and zinc, by five different populations and applied cap grades as shown in Table 14-8. The populations are Kp and Ki in the NE domain, Kp and Ki in the SW domain, and Indidura. The top part of the table shows the cap grades and the bottom shows the number of assays capped. The cap grades were generally derived by reviewing probability plots and sorted lists of the assays to find breaks in the distributions.

 

Table 14-8
Cap Grades and Number of Assays Capped

 

        Northeast     Southwest        
Metal   Units   KP     KI     KP     KI     Indidura  
Gold   (g/t)     10.5       4.5       33       7.1       10  
                                             
Silver   (g/t)     115       76       170       350       75  
                                             
Lead   (%)     2.3       1.6       4.0       2.4       0.65  
                                             
Zinc   (%)     3.5       2.1       6.5       4.2       4  

 

Number of Assays Capped

 

        Northeast     Southwest        
Metal   Units   KP     KI     KP     KI     Indidura  
Gold   (none)     28       18       42       49       21  
                                             
Silver   (none)     22       21       42       36       14  
                                             
Lead   (none)     6       9       13       28       7  
                                             
Zinc   (none)     6       12       8       5       20  

 

The cap grades tend to be around the 99.8 to 99.9 percentile of the distributions; they would not generally be considered very aggressive capping. Figure 14-9 and Figure 14-10 show probability plots of gold assays and gold composites respectively for the NE domain. The plots show original and capped values for the Kp and Ki alterations types. Figure 14-11 and Figure 14-12 show the probability plots for gold for the SW domain and Figure 14-13 and Figure 14-14 are for Indidura.

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-21

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The lithology and alteration codes were assigned to the drillhole database by back-assignment from the solids. The NE/SW domain codes were assigned to the database by back-assignment from the model.

 

The drillhole database was composited to regular 5m downhole composites, though the current model is based on 10m blocks. This was to avoid blurring the rock type and alteration contacts.

 

Table 14-9 and Table 14-10 show basic descriptive statistics for the assays and 5m composites respectively. Results are shown for gold, silver, lead, and zinc and are by the various domain and alteration populations. The left side of the table shows results for uncapped values and the right side shows capped values. One item of interest is that silver, lead, and zinc grades are significantly higher in the NE domain than the SW.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-22

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 14-9
Summary Statistics of Assays

 

    Not Capped     Capped  
    No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min     No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min  
Metal/Domain   Samples     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     Samples     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)  
Gold:     87,152       0.587       2.206       290.0       0.002       87,152       0.565       1.594       33.0       0.002  
Northeast Domain:     22,080       0.569       1.073       51.3       0.002       22,080       0.559       0.899       10.5       0.002  
Kp Alteration     13,315       0.797       1.285       51.3       0.002       13,315       0.782       1.050       10.5       0.002  
Ki Alteration     8,765       0.223       0.441       8.4       0.002       8,765       0.220       0.412       4.5       0.002  
Southwest Domain:     60,446       0.588       2.505       290.0       0.002       60,446       0.564       1.802       33.0       0.002  
Kp Alteration     30,113       1.013       3.410       290.0       0.002       30,113       0.975       2.426       33.0       0.002  
Ki Alteration     30,333       0.166       0.777       48.0       0.002       30,333       0.156       0.546       7.1       0.002  
All Caracol     82,526       0.583       2.215       290.0       0.002       82,526       0.562       1.611       33.0       0.002  
Kp Alteration     43,428       0.946       2.929       290.0       0.002       43,428       0.916       2.104       33.0       0.002  
Ki Alteration     39,098       0.179       0.716       48.0       0.002       39,098       0.170       0.520       7.1       0.002  
Indidura     3,883       0.720       2.212       63.8       0.002       3,883       0.657       1.321       10.0       0.002  

  
    Not Capped     Capped  
    No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min     No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min  
Metal/Domain   Samples     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     Samples     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)  
Silver:     87,155       7.22       25.58       4870       0.14       87,155       7.02       16.25       652       0.14  
Northeast Domain:     22,080       11.77       35.71       4870       0.25       22,080       11.47       12.86       115       0.25  
Kp Alteration     13,315       15.71       44.95       4870       0.25       13,315       15.26       13.99       115       0.25  
Ki Alteration     8,765       5.78       9.14       338       0.25       8,765       5.72       8.01       76       0.25  
Southwest Domain:     60,449       5.68       21.21       1310       0.14       60,449       5.51       17.24       350       0.14  
Kp Alteration     30,116       6.90       15.91       804       0.25       30,116       6.79       13.75       170       0.25  
Ki Alteration     30,333       4.46       25.34       1310       0.14       30,333       4.24       20.03       350       0.14  
All Caracol     82,529       7.31       26.04       4870       0.14       82,529       7.10       16.39       350       0.14  
Kp Alteration     43,431       9.60       28.49       4870       0.25       43,431       9.38       14.37       170       0.25  
Ki Alteration     39,098       4.76       22.74       1310       0.14       39,098       4.57       18.05       350       0.14  
Indidura     3,883       5.59       12.50       421       0.25       3,883       5.41       9.73       75       0.25  
 
    Not Capped     Capped  
    No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min     No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min  
Metal/Domain   Samples     (%)     (%)     (%)     (%)     Samples     (%)     (%)     (%)     (%)  
Lead:     87,154       0.09       0.22       12.85       0.00       87,154       0.09       0.20       4.00       0.00  
Northeast Domain:     22,080       0.20       0.24       8.85       0.00       22,080       0.20       0.23       2.30       0.00  
Kp Alteration     13,315       0.27       0.25       3.72       0.00       13,315       0.27       0.24       2.30       0.00  
Ki Alteration     8,765       0.09       0.18       8.85       0.00       8,765       0.09       0.15       1.60       0.00  
Southwest Domain:     60,449       0.05       0.21       12.85       0.00       60,449       0.05       0.18       4.00       0.00  
Kp Alteration     30,116       0.07       0.23       12.85       0.00       30,116       0.07       0.20       4.00       0.00  
Ki Alteration     30,333       0.03       0.17       7.90       0.00       30,333       0.03       0.14       2.40       0.00  
All Caracol     82,529       0.09       0.23       12.85       0.00       82,529       0.09       0.20       4.00       0.00  
Kp Alteration     43,431       0.13       0.26       12.85       0.00       43,431       0.13       0.24       4.00       0.00  
Ki Alteration     39,098       0.05       0.18       8.85       0.00       39,098       0.04       0.15       2.40       0.00  
Indidura     3,882       0.02       0.07       2.69       0.00       3,882       0.01       0.05       0.65       0.00  
 
    Not Capped     Capped  
    No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min     No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min  
Metal/Domain   Samples     (%)     (%)     (%)     (%)     Samples     (%)     (%)     (%)     (%)  
Zinc:     87,154       0.21       0.39       22.20       0.00       87,154       0.21       0.37       6.50       0.00  
Northeast Domain:     22,080       0.33       0.32       5.44       0.00       22,080       0.33       0.32       3.50       0.00  
Kp Alteration     13,315       0.44       0.34       4.41       0.00       13,315       0.44       0.34       3.50       0.00  
Ki Alteration     8,765       0.18       0.22       5.44       0.00       8,765       0.18       0.19       2.10       0.00  
Southwest Domain:     60,449       0.16       0.38       22.20       0.00       60,449       0.16       0.37       6.50       0.00  
Kp Alteration     30,116       0.26       0.48       22.20       0.00       30,116       0.26       0.45       6.50       0.00  
Ki Alteration     30,333       0.07       0.22       7.31       0.00       30,333       0.07       0.22       4.20       0.00  
All Caracol     82,529       0.21       0.38       22.20       0.00       82,529       0.21       0.36       6.50       0.00  
Kp Alteration     43,431       0.31       0.45       22.20       0.00       43,431       0.31       0.43       6.50       0.00  
Ki Alteration     39,098       0.09       0.23       7.31       0.00       39,098       0.09       0.22       4.20       0.00  
Indidura     3,882       0.28       0.58       7.31       0.00       3,882       0.27       0.54       4.00       0.00  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-23

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 14-10
Summary Statistics of 5m Composites

 

    Not Capped     Capped  
    No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min     No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min  
Metal/Domain   Samples     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     Samples     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)  
Gold:     27,269       0.586       1.389       89.1       0.002       27,269       0.565       1.077       29.0       0.002  
Northeast Domain:     7,287       0.578       0.796       22.3       0.002       7,287       0.568       0.695       7.3       0.002  
Kp Alteration     4,453       0.798       0.918       22.3       0.017       4,453       0.783       0.781       7.3       0.017  
Ki Alteration     2,834       0.232       0.330       4.4       0.002       2,834       0.230       0.309       3.8       0.002  
Southwest Domain:     18,545       0.585       1.573       89.1       0.002       18,545       0.561       1.210       29.0       0.002  
Kp Alteration     9,278       1.002       2.084       89.1       0.002       9,278       0.965       1.570       29.0       0.002  
Ki Alteration     9,267       0.167       0.505       19.7       0.002       9,267       0.157       0.368       6.2       0.002  
All Caracol     25,832       0.583       1.398       89.1       0.002       25,832       0.563       1.090       29.0       0.002  
Kp Alteration     13,731       0.936       1.794       89.1       0.002       13,731       0.906       1.368       29.0       0.002  
Ki Alteration     12,101       0.182       0.471       19.7       0.002       12,101       0.174       0.356       6.2       0.002  
Indidura     1,185       0.722       1.304       21.6       0.003       1,185       0.660       0.846       5.5       0.003  

 
    Not Capped     Capped  
    No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min     No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min  
Metal/Domain   Samples     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     Samples     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)     (g/t)  
Silver:     27,269       7.34       17.78       1961       0.25       27,269       7.13       11.50       368       0.25  
Northeast Domain:     7,287       11.93       25.36       1961       0.25       7,287       11.58       10.44       91       0.25  
Kp Alteration     4,453       15.78       31.43       1961       0.25       4,453       15.25       11.03       91       0.25  
Ki Alteration     2,834       5.88       6.40       115       0.25       2,834       5.81       5.89       58       0.25  
Southwest Domain:     18,545       5.67       13.75       531       0.25       18,545       5.50       11.42       245       0.25  
Kp Alteration     9,278       6.90       10.43       252       0.25       9,278       6.79       9.33       134       0.25  
Ki Alteration     9,267       4.43       16.33       531       0.25       9,267       4.21       13.07       245       0.25  
All Caracol     25,832       7.43       18.03       1961       0.25       25,832       7.21       11.49       245       0.25  
Kp Alteration     13,731       9.78       20.28       1961       0.25       13,731       9.53       10.67       134       0.25  
Ki Alteration     12,101       4.77       14.63       531       0.25       12,101       4.58       11.80       245       0.25  
Indidura     1,185       5.60       8.34       140       0.25       1,185       5.42       6.79       67       0.25  
 
    Not Capped     Capped  
    No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min     No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min  
Metal/Domain   Samples     (%)     (%)     (%)     (%)     Samples     (%)     (%)     (%)     (%)  
Lead:     27,269       0.09       0.16       4.61       0.00       27,269       0.09       0.15       2.12       0.00  
Northeast Domain:     7,287       0.20       0.19       2.99       0.00       7,287       0.20       0.19       1.45       0.00  
Kp Alteration     4,453       0.27       0.20       1.56       0.00       4,453       0.27       0.20       1.45       0.00  
Ki Alteration     2,834       0.09       0.12       2.99       0.00       2,834       0.09       0.11       0.93       0.00  
Southwest Domain:     18,545       0.05       0.13       4.61       0.00       18,545       0.05       0.12       2.12       0.00  
Kp Alteration     9,278       0.07       0.15       4.61       0.00       9,278       0.07       0.14       2.12       0.00  
Ki Alteration     9,267       0.03       0.11       3.62       0.00       9,267       0.03       0.09       1.52       0.00  
All Caracol     25,832       0.09       0.17       4.61       0.00       25,832       0.09       0.16       2.12       0.00  
Kp Alteration     13,731       0.13       0.19       4.61       0.00       13,731       0.13       0.18       2.12       0.00  
Ki Alteration     12,101       0.05       0.12       3.62       0.00       12,101       0.05       0.10       1.52       0.00  
Indidura     1,185       0.02       0.05       1.01       0.00       1,185       0.01       0.04       0.44       0.00  
                                                                                 
    Not Capped     Capped  
    No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min     No. of     Mean     Std Dev     Max     Min  
Metal/Domain   Samples     (%)     (%)     (%)     (%)     Samples     (%)     (%)     (%)     (%)  
Zinc:     27,269       0.21       0.28       7.83       0.00       27,269       0.21       0.27       3.61       0.00  
Northeast Domain:     7,287       0.34       0.27       3.23       0.01       7,287       0.34       0.27       3.12       0.01  
Kp Alteration     4,453       0.44       0.28       3.23       0.04       4,453       0.44       0.28       3.12       0.04  
Ki Alteration     2,834       0.18       0.17       2.95       0.01       2,834       0.18       0.15       1.37       0.01  
Southwest Domain:     18,545       0.16       0.26       7.83       0.00       18,545       0.16       0.26       3.61       0.00  
Kp Alteration     9,278       0.26       0.32       7.83       0.00       9,278       0.26       0.31       3.61       0.00  
Ki Alteration     9,267       0.07       0.14       2.55       0.00       9,267       0.07       0.14       2.54       0.00  
All Caracol     25,832       0.21       0.28       7.83       0.00       25,832       0.21       0.27       3.61       0.00  
Kp Alteration     13,731       0.32       0.32       7.83       0.00       13,731       0.32       0.31       3.61       0.00  
Ki Alteration     12,101       0.09       0.16       2.95       0.00       12,101       0.09       0.15       2.54       0.00  
Indidura     1,185       0.28       0.37       3.87       0.00       1,185       0.27       0.34       2.93       0.00  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-24

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-9
Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – NE Domain

 

 

Figure 14-10
Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – NE Domain

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-25

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-11
Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – SW Domain

 

 

Figure 14-12
Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – SW Domain

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-26

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-13
Probability Plot of Gold Assays by Alteration Type – Indidura

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-27

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-14
Probability Plot of Gold 5m Composites by Alteration Type – Indidura

 

14.2.4 Variograms

 

14.2.4.1 Northeast Domain

 

IMC conducted a variogram analysis of gold in the Kp alteration type for the NE domain. The analysis was based on the 5m composites. Figure 14-15 shows the variogram in the N60oE direction with no dip. This is a good variogram in terms of clarity and has a range of about 135m. This direction is assumed as the major axis for the variogram model. Figure 14-16 shows the variogram in the S30oE direction with a dip of 15o. This is also a good variogram in terms of clarity with ranges of 85 and 160m for the two structures fit to it. It is noted that the primary and secondary directions conform to the strike and dip of the bedding.

 

Figure 14-17 shows the variogram in the north direction with a 60o dip. This is approximately, but not exactly, the tertiary direction to the previous variograms. This direction represents the approximate downhole direction for much of the drilling, so is a convenient direction for calculation. The variogram is of good clarity, but relatively short range. The range of the first structure fit to the variogram is about 32m and about 90% of the total variability in this variogram takes place within about this distance.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-28

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

14.2.4.2 Southwest Domain

 

Figure 14-18 shows the variogram in the S60oW direction with a 25o dip for the SW domain. This is assumed to be the primary axis, and it appears evident on cross sections. The variogram has good clarity with a range of about 100m.

 

Figure 14-19 shows the variogram in the north direction with a 60o dip. As previously mentioned, this is the approximate downhole direction for much of the drilling. Orla geologic personnel propose that a primary control of mineralization is related to structures trending about N60oE with a steep NNW dip. This variogram is approximately in that direction. It can be seen however that the range of the variogram is quite short, about 8m for the first structure and 31m for the second structure. However, IMC could not find any direction perpendicular to the major axis that produced good variogram results. Based on this, it was determined to assume the secondary and tertiary directions were the same, and about half the range of the primary direction.

 

IMC did not run variograms for Indidura; there is not sufficient drilling. Indidura grade estimation are the same as for the SW domain. IMC also did not run variogram for the lower grade Ki alteration zones. The Ki searches are assumed to be the same as for Kp alteration.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-29

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-15
NE Domain Gold Variogram – Primary Axis

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-30

 

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-16
NE Domain Gold Variogram – Secondary Axis

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-31

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-17
NE Domain Gold Variogram – Tertiary Axis

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-32

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-18
SW Domain Gold Variogram – Primary Axis

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-33

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-19
SW Domain Gold Variogram – Down Hole Variogram

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-34

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

14.2.5 Block Grade Estimation

 

The Kp versus Ki alteration types were treated as a hard boundary for estimation purposes. Kp blocks were only estimated with Kp composites, etc. The Indidura/Caracol boundary was also a hard boundary. The alteration types and estimation domains result in five combinations for grade estimation:

 

· Kp in the NE domain

· Ki in the NE domain

· Kp in the SW domain

· Ki in the SW domain

· Indidura

 

The NE and SW domains were not a hard boundary for estimation. The domains were used to control search orientation. For the NE Caracol (Kp and Ki), the primary axis of the search ellipse had a dip direction and dip of 60o (N60oE) and 0o respectively and the secondary axis had a dip direction and dip of 150o (S30oE) and 15o (down) respectively. The search radii were 100m along the primary and secondary directions and 30m in the tertiary direction.

 

IMC estimated grades for gold, silver, lead, and zinc using inverse distance with a power weight of 2 (ID2). A maximum of 15 composites, a minimum of three and a maximum of three composites per hole was used. The effect of inverse distance weighting along with a relatively low number of composites should produce relatively unsmoothed estimates of block grades. Also recall that 5m composites were used to estimate the grades of the 10m blocks. Figure 14-20 shows a cross section of the gold grades in the NE domain.

 

For the SW Caracol (again Kp and Ki), the primary axis of the search ellipse had a dip direction and dip of 240o (S60oW) and 25o (down). The search radii were 100m along the major axis and 50m, circular, perpendicular to the primary axis.

 

A maximum of 24 composites, a minimum of four and a maximum of eight composites per hole was used. This is more composites, and more per hole, than was used for the NE domain, but is necessary since there is not as much clarity on the secondary versus tertiary direction in the SW domain. Figure 14-21 shows a cross section of gold grades in the SW domain. Figure 14-22 shows the gold grades on the long section.

 

Indidura was estimated with the same parameters as the SW domain.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-35

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Figure 14-20
Gold Grades on Section 29, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-36

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-21
Gold Grades on Section 18, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-37

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 14-22
Gold Grades on Section L112, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-38

 

 

    

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

14.2.6 Resource Classification

  

For the purpose of classifying the mineral resources, two additional block estimates were done. They were based on the same search orientations and search radii as the grade estimates. The first estimate was based on a maximum of four composites, a minimum of four, and a maximum of one composite per hole. The second estimate was based on a maximum of three composites, a minimum of three, and a maximum of one composite per hole. These estimates provide the average distance to the nearest three and four holes to each block and were put into the block model. Note the grade from this estimate was not used. The Kp/Ki contact was not used as a hard boundary for these estimations.

 

Blocks with an average distance to four holes less than or equal to 25m were assigned as measured mineral resource. Blocks with an average distance to the nearest three holes less than 45m, but greater than 25m from the nearest four holes, were assigned as indicated mineral resource. Blocks with an average distance to three holes greater than 45m were assigned to inferred mineral resource. The distribution of drilling at Camino Rojo is quite variable. Generally (not specific to Camino Rojo) an average distance to the nearest four holes of 25m corresponds to an average drill spacing of 30m to 33m. An average distance to the nearest three holes of 45m corresponds to an average drill spacing of about 60m. These estimates are approximate.

 

Figure 14-23, Figure 14-24 and Figure 14-25 show the probability plots for these average distances for the NE, SW, and Indidura domains respectively. The approximate percent of blocks in each resource category are as follows:

 

    Measured     Indicated     Inferred  
Northeast     12.7 %     79.0 %     8.3 %
                         
Southwest     1.9 %     61.1 %     37.0 %
                         
Indidura     1.8 %     41.4 %     56.8 %

 

Figure 14-26 and Figure 14-27 show the resource classification on cross sections.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-39

 

   

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

    

Figure 14-23
Average Distance to Nearest 3 and 4 Holes – NE Domain

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-40

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

   

Figure 14-24
Average Distance to Nearest 3 and 4 Holes – SW Domain

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-41

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

  

Figure 14-25
Average Distance to Nearest 3 and 4 Holes – Indidura

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-42

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

   

Figure 14-26
Resource Class on Section 18, IMC 2018

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-43

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

   

Figure 14-27
Resource Class on Section 29, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-44

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

14.2.7 Bulk Density

 

The database included about 10,000 specific gravity tests conducted on core. Some were based on the wax immersion method, but most were based on cutting whole core to obtain small cylinders and measuring them to obtain the volume; they were then weighed to obtain an estimate of dry specific gravity.

 

IMC examined this data by rock type and domain. Table 14-11 shows the results.

 

Table 14-11
Specific Gravity and Bulk Density

 

Lithology   Alteration   Domain     Specific
Gravity
    Bulk
Factor
    Bulk
Density
    Ktonnes/
Block
 
Post Min                 2.00       0.98       1.96       1.96  
                                             
Caracol   None     None       2.60       0.98       2.55       2.55  
                                             
Caracol   Kp, Ki     NE       2.49       0.98       2.44       2.44  
                                             
Indidura                 2.66       0.98       2.61       2.61  

 

The post mineral rock types averaged about 2.0. The un-mineralized and also mineralized southwest Caracol unit averaged about 2.60. The Kp and Ki Caracol in the northeast domain were slightly lighter, averaging about 2.49. The Indidura unit averaged about 2.66.

 

The average specific gravity was reduced 2% to obtain an estimate of bulk density. This is to allow for voids in the rock mass at a larger scale than what could be captured in the small core samples.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 14-45

 

 

 
  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

15.0 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE

 

It is not the intent of this Technical Report to report mineral reserves for the Camino Rojo project. At the Preliminary Economic Assessment level, mineral reserves are not required to be identified. Additional studies at the Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility Study level will be required to establish mineral reserves.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 15-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

16.0 MINING METHODS

  

This PEA is preliminary in nature and it includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.

 

16.1 Operating Parameters and Criteria

 

The Camino Rojo PEA is based on a conventional open pit mine. Mine operations will consist of drilling medium diameter blast holes (approximately 17cm), blasting with either explosive slurries or ANFO (ammonium nitrate/fuel oil) depending on water conditions, and loading into large off-road trucks with hydraulic shovels and wheel loaders. Resource will be delivered to the primary crusher and waste to the waste storage facility southeast of the pit. There will also be a low-grade stockpile facility to store marginal resource for processing at the end of commercial pit operations. There will be a fleet of track dozers, rubber tired dozers, motor graders and water trucks to maintain the working areas of the pit, waste storage areas, and haul roads.

 

A mine plan was developed to supply resource to a conventional crushing and heap leach plant with the capacity to process 18,000 tpd (6,570 ktpy). The mine is scheduled to operate two 10 hour shifts per day for 365 days per year.

 

The mine plan is constrained by the Adjacent Owner concession boundary on the north side of the pit. The PEA is based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the PEA.

 

The geotechnical parameters relevant to the mine plan are discussed in Section 16.2 and are adequate for this PEA level study. If the constrained pit case is adopted for the next level of evaluations, some additional drilling and slope stability work is suggested to evaluate the revised position of the north wall.

 

Eventually, mining will be conducted below the water table and additional hydrogeological studies are required to better estimate pit dewatering requirements.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

16.2 Slope Angles

 

Slope angles are based on the report “Camino Rojo Project – Prefeasibility Pit Slope Design Study – Geotechnical Investigations and Slope Design Recommendations for the Proposed Oxide and Sulphide Open Pits”, dated May 2016 by Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd. (“Piteau”). Figure 16-1 shows the inter-ramp (“IR”) slope angle recommendations from that report.

 

The pit design proposed for this study is smaller than the pit shown on Figure 16-1 due to the Adjancent Owner concession boundary constraint. Piteau reviewed the slope angles for the smaller pit during May 2018 and allowed that the north wall with the 40o IR recommendation could be increased to 45o due to the pit not being as deep. They also allowed the slope angle for the north wall could be increased to 53o for the bottom six or so benches below a haul road in the pit design with some additional support for the road. The south wall was decreased 1o from 54o to 53o. The 54o IR angle was based on double benching 15m benches, instead of the 10m benches for the current design. Figure 16-1 illustrates the recommended slope angles for the pit.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-2

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 16-1

Slope Angle Recommendations, Piteau 2016

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-3

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

16.3 Economic Parameters

 

Table 16-1 shows the parameters for pit design. Only gold and silver are produced for this plan and the only material types considered are the Kp Oxide, Ki Oxide, Transitional Hi, and Transitional Low.

 

Gold and silver prices are $1250 and $17 respectively. These are consistent with the 3 year backward average that is used by the US SEC as a benchmark.

 

The mining cost is estimated at $2.00 per total tonne. This was estimated by IMC and is assumed to be an all-in cost for contract mining. It is based on a calculated owner mining cost plus an allowance for equipment depreciation and contractor profit. The unit costs for mining, processing, and G&A shown on Table 16-1 are preliminary estimates used for design and are not the final estimates developed by this study. The final estimates used for the economic analysis are presented in Section 21.0.

 

The processing and G&A costs of $3.03 and $1.69 per processed tonne respectively were provided by KCA and are based on a production rate of 18,000 tonnes per day or about 6.75 million tonnes per year of material processed. Processing is by crushing and heap leaching. The gold and silver recoveries by material type were also provided by KCA in the Process Design Criteria document.

 

IMC assumed 100% refinery payables for this case. The gold and silver refining costs are also IMC estimates. The oxide material is subject to a 2% NSR royalty.

 

Due to two products, and also variable recoveries by material type, a gold equivalent grade or NSR value was used to tabulate proposed quantities of mineralized material. The gold and silver NSR factors for Kp Oxide are calculated as follows:

 

Gold NSR Factor = ($1250 – $5.00) x 0.70 x 1.00 x 0.98 / 31.103 = $27.459

 

Silver NSR Factor = ($17 – $0.50) x 0.13 x 1.00 x 0.98 / 31.103 = $0.0676

 

The units are US$ per gram per tonne. The 0.98 term allows for the royalty.

 

The silver divisor is $27.459 / $0.0676 = 406.3, and

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-4

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Gold Equivalent = Gold + Silver / 406.3

 

Alternatively, the NSR value for a block is calculated as:

 

NSR = $27.459 x gold + $0.0676 x silver

 

The breakeven gold equivalent cutoff grade for Kp Oxide is 0.24 g/t. Internal cutoff is 0.17 g/t. Internal cutoff applies to blocks that have to be removed from the pit, so mining is a sunk cost. The cutoff grades for the other material types are also shown on the table.

 

The breakeven NSR cutoff is $6.72, the mining + process + G&A cost per tonne. The internal NSR cutoff grade is $4.72 per tonne, the process + G&A cost. Note the NSR cutoff does not vary by material type, so is convenient for mine planning and scheduling.

 

IMC is assuming that measured, indicated, and inferred mineral resources are allowed to contribute to the economics for the PEA study.

 

Table 16-1 represents the economic parameters for the mine design.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-5

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 16-1

Economic Parameters for Mine Design

 

Material Type   Units     Kp Oxide     Ki Oxide     Tran-Hi     Tran-Low     Waste  
Commodity Prices                                                
Gold Price Per Ounce     (US$)       1250       1250       1250       1250          
Silver Price Per Ounce     (US$)       17.00       17.00       17.00       17.00          
Mining Cost Per Tonne                                                
Total Mining Cost     (US$)       2.00       2.00       2.00       2.00       2.00  
Process and G&A Cost Per Ore Tonne                                                
Processing     (US$)       3.033       3.033       3.033       3.033          
G&A     (US$)       1.687       1.687       1.687       1.687          
Total Process and G&A     (US$)       4.720       4.720       4.720       4.720          
Plant Recovery                                                
Gold     (%)       70 %     58 %     60 %     49 %        
Silver     (%)       13 %     20 %     17 %     20 %        
Refinery Payables and Costs                                                
Gold Refinery Payable     (%)       100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %        
Silver Refinery Payable     (%)       100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %        
Gold Refining Per Ounce     (US$)       5.00       5.00       5.00       5.00          
Silver Refining Per Ounce     (US$)       0.50       0.50       0.50       0.50          
Royalties                                                
Royalty     (%)       2 %     2 %     2 %     2 %        
NSR Factors                                                
Gold NSR Factor     ($/g)       27.459       22.752       23.537       19.222          
Silver NSR Factor     ($/g)       0.0676       0.1040       0.0884       0.1040          
Silver Divisor for Gold Equivalent     (none)       406.3       218.8       266.3       184.9          
Gold Equivalent Cutoff Grades                                                
Breakeven Gold Equivalent Cutoff     (g/t)       0.24       0.30       0.29       0.35          
Internal Gold Equivalent Cutoff     (g/t)       0.17       0.21       0.20       0.25          
NSR Cutoff Grades                                                
Breakeven NSR Cutoff Grade     ($/t)       6.72       6.72       6.72       6.72          
Internal NSR Cutoff Grade     ($/t)       4.72       4.72       4.72       4.72          

 

16.4 Final Pit Design

 

The final pit design is based on the results of a floating cone analysis using the parameters discussed in the previous section. Figure 16-2 shows the final pit design. Due to space limitations there is only one mining phase, the final pit. The design includes the haul road and sufficient working room for the equipment. The road is 21m wide at a maximum grade of 10%. This will accommodate trucks of approximately 53 tonne capacity such as Caterpillar 773 class trucks.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-6

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

16.5 Mine Production Schedule

 

The schedule is based on processing the resource by crushing and heap leaching at a production rate of 18,000 tpd, or 6,570 ktpy. Table 16-2 shows the schedule. Year 1 is by quarters, and the rest of the schedule is by years. The project has an estimated mine life of 6.6 years.

 

The upper section of the table shows crusher feed material by time period. This is material that is processed during the same time period it is mined and amounts to 37.6 million tonnes at 0.764 g/t gold and 14.20 g/t silver. This produces about 924,200 ounces of contained gold and 617,400 ounces of recoverable gold for an average recovery of 66.8%. Contained and recoverable silver amounts to 17.2 and 2.51 million ounces respectively for an average recovery of 14.6%. As we have discussed, due to two products, gold and silver, and different recoveries for the different material types, an NSR cutoff grade was used to classify resource and waste for scheduling. The internal NSR cutoff grade is $4.72, but this is only used for Year 6. For the other periods the cutoff grade varies by period to balance the mine and plant production capacities.

 

Low grade is material between an NSR cutoff grade of $5.50 per tonne and the operating cutoff grade for the year. This amounts to 4.86 million tonnes at 0.264 g/t gold and 8.56 g/t silver. The $5.50 low grade stockpile cutoff is the internal cutoff grade of $4.72 and an allowance of about $0.78 for rehandle costs. This material is processed at the end of commercial pit production during Years 6 and 7.

 

The bottom of Table 16-2 shows that preproduction is 500,000 tonnes of total material. Yr1 Q1 plant production is 50% of capacity and is made up of material mined during preproduction and Yr1 Q1. Total mine production also ramps up during the first quarter of Year 1 to a rate of about 3,300 kt per quarter for Year 1 quarters 2 through 4. Total material is about 13 million tonnes per year for Years 2 and 3, after which it reduces. Total material is 67.0 million tonnes. Waste, net of the low grade, is 24.5 million tonnes for an average waste ratio of 0.58 to 1.

 

Table 16-3 shows a proposed plant production schedule, including the direct feed material and the low grade stockpile. Total material processed amounts to 42.5 million tonnes at 0.707 g/t gold and 13.56 g/t silver for 965,500 contained gold ounces and 18.5 million contained silver ounces. Recoverable gold and silver amounts to 642,300 and 2.7 million ounces respectively.

 

Table 16-4 shows the proposed plant schedule by material type.

 

Figure 16-2 shows the final pit design. Figure 16-3 through 16-8 show the pit at the end of each mining year.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-7

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 16-2
Final Pit, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-8

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 16-2
Mine Production Schedule - $1250MII - 6,570 KTPY - Base Case

 

MINE PRODUCTION
SCHEDULE:
  (Units)     TOTAL     PP     Yr1 Q1     Yr1 Q2     Yr1 Q3     Yr1 Q4     Year 2     Year 3     Year 4     Year 5     Year 6  
LEACH RESOURCE:                                                                                                
NSR Cutoff     ($/t)               6.50       6.50       5.75       6.00       6.50       7.00       9.00       9.00       9.00       4.72  
Ktonnes     (kt)       37,618       152       669       1,642       1,642       1,643       6,570       6,570       6,570       6,570       5,590  
NSR     ($/t)       21.10       23.30       23.27       16.51       16.62       17.02       18.70       21.76       23.80       23.21       21.08  
Gold     (g/t)       0.764       0.844       0.843       0.595       0.599       0.609       0.664       0.768       0.837       0.841       0.833  
Silver     (g/t)       14.20       9.65       9.64       9.83       9.88       10.23       11.00       12.58       15.06       16.39       20.70  
Recovered Gold     (g/t)       0.510       0.576       0.575       0.401       0.404       0.414       0.456       0.532       0.580       0.560       0.492  
Recovered Silver     (g/t)       2.08       1.38       1.38       1.45       1.45       1.48       1.53       1.69       2.02       2.37       3.55  
Contained Gold     (koz)       924.2       4.1       18.1       31.4       31.6       32.2       140.3       162.3       176.9       177.6       149.7  
Recoverable Gold     (koz)       617.4       2.8       12.4       21.2       21.3       21.9       96.3       112.4       122.4       118.2       88.4  
Contained Silver     (koz)       17,180       47       207       519       522       540       2,323       2,658       3,181       3,463       3,720  
Recoverable Silver     (koz)       2,513       7       30       77       77       78       324       356       426       501       639  
Gold Recovery     (%)       66.8 %     68.2 %     68.2 %     67.5 %     67.5 %     68.0 %     68.7 %     69.2 %     69.2 %     66.6 %     59.1 %
Silver Recovery     (%)       14.6 %     14.3 %     14.3 %     14.7 %     14.7 %     14.5 %     13.9 %     13.4 %     13.4 %     14.5 %     17.2 %
LOW GRADE STOCKPILE:                                                                                                
NSR Cutoff     ($/t)               5.50       5.50       5.50       5.50       5.50       5.50       5.50       5.50       5.50       5.50  
Ktonnes     (kt)       4,859       3       13       37       73       132       749       1,540       1,367       945          
NSR     ($/t)       7.04       6.13       6.13       5.62       5.74       6.01       6.31       7.21       7.30       7.26          
Gold     (g/t)       0.264       0.242       0.242       0.212       0.216       0.227       0.240       0.267       0.268       0.286          
Silver     (g/t)       8.56       6.04       6.04       7.21       7.30       7.15       7.19       8.48       9.32       9.05          
Recovered Gold     (g/t)       0.160       0.140       0.140       0.125       0.130       0.135       0.144       0.165       0.163       0.167          
Recovered Silver     (g/t)       1.46       1.21       1.21       1.42       1.38       1.32       1.30       1.44       1.48       1.61          
Contained Gold     (koz)       41.3       0.0       0.1       0.3       0.5       1.0       5.8       13.2       11.8       8.7          
Recoverable Gold     (koz)       25.0       0.0       0.1       0.1       0.3       0.6       3.5       8.2       7.2       5.1          
Contained Silver     (koz)       1,337       1       3       9       17       30       173       420       410       275          
Recoverable Silver     (koz)       228       0       1       2       3       6       31       71       65       49          
Gold Recovery     (%)       60.4 %     57.9 %     57.9 %     58.8 %     60.1 %     59.6 %     59.8 %     61.6 %     61.0 %     58.4 %        
Silver Recovery     (%)       17.0 %     20.0 %     20.0 %     19.7 %     18.9 %     18.4 %     18.1 %     17.0 %     15.9 %     17.8 %        
TOTAL MATERIAL AND WASTE:                                                                                                
Total Material     (kt)       67,014       500       2,200       3,281       3,318       3,324       13,123       12,954       11,154       10,095       7,065  
Waste (Net of Low Grade)     (kt)       24,537       345       1,518       1,602       1,603       1,549       5,804       4,844       3,217       2,580       1,475  
Waste Ratio     (none)       0.58       2.23       2.23       0.95       0.93       0.87       0.79       0.60       0.41       0.34       0.26  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-9

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 16-3
Proposed Plant Production Schedule - $1250MII - 6,570 KTPY - Base Case

 

PLANT
PRODUCTION
SCHEDULE:
  (Units)     TOTAL     PP     Yr1 Q1     Yr1 Q2     Yr1 Q3     Yr1 Q4     Year 2     Year 3     Year 4     Year 5     Year 6     Year 7  
LEACH RESOURCE:                                                                                                        
NSR Cutoff     ($/t)                       7.50       6.00       6.00       6.50       7.00       9.00       9.00       9.00       5.06       5.50  
Ktonnes     (kt)       42,477               821       1,642       1,642       1,643       6,570       6,570       6,570       6,570       6,570       3,879  
NSR     ($/t)       19.50               23.27       16.51       16.62       17.02       18.70       21.76       23.80       23.21       19.01       6.98  
Gold     (g/t)       0.707               0.843       0.595       0.599       0.609       0.664       0.768       0.837       0.841       0.752       0.259  
Silver     (g/t)       13.56               9.64       9.83       9.88       10.23       11.00       12.58       15.06       16.39       18.93       8.48  
Recovered Gold     (g/t)       0.470               0.575       0.401       0.404       0.414       0.456       0.532       0.580       0.560       0.443       0.158  
Recovered Silver     (g/t)       2.01               1.38       1.45       1.45       1.48       1.53       1.69       2.02       2.37       3.26       1.43  
Contained Gold     (koz)       965.5               22.3       31.4       31.6       32.2       140.3       162.3       176.9       177.6       158.7       32.2  
Recoverable Gold     (koz)       642.3               15.2       21.2       21.3       21.9       96.3       112.4       122.4       118.2       93.6       19.7  
Contained Silver     (koz)       18,517               254       519       522       540       2,323       2,658       3,181       3,463       3,999       1,057  
Recoverable Silver     (koz)       2,741               36       77       77       78       324       356       426       501       689       178  
Gold Recovery     (%)       66.5 %             68.2 %     67.5 %     67.5 %     68.0 %     68.7 %     69.2 %     69.2 %     66.6 %     59.0 %     61.2 %
Silver Recovery     (%)       14.8 %             14.3 %     14.7 %     14.7 %     14.5 %     13.9 %     13.4 %     13.4 %     14.5 %     17.2 %     16.8 %

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-10

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 16-4

Proposed Plant Production Schedule by Material Type - $1250MII - 6,570 KTPY - Base Case

 

MATERIAL
TYPE:
  (Units)     TOTAL     PP     Yr1 Q1     Yr1 Q2     Yr1 Q3     Yr1 Q4     Year 2     Year 3     Year 4     Year 5     Year 6     Year 7  
KP Oxide:                                                                                                        
Ktonnes     (kt)       28,561               609       1,098       1,112       1,202       5,341       5,958       5,902       4,739       1,367       1,233  
NSR     ($/t)       22.57               27.24       20.10       20.06       19.89       20.81       22.79       25.05       25.69       25.07       7.35  
Gold     (g/t)       0.788               0.966       0.705       0.704       0.697       0.729       0.798       0.873       0.895       0.870       0.239  
Silver     (g/t)       13.82               10.59       11.00       11.01       11.12       11.70       13.08       15.83       16.54       17.57       11.65  
Recovered Gold     (g/t)       0.551               0.676       0.493       0.492       0.488       0.510       0.558       0.611       0.626       0.611       0.167  
Recovered Silver     (g/t)       1.80               1.38       1.43       1.43       1.45       1.52       1.70       2.06       2.15       2.29       1.51  
KI Oxide:                                                                                                        
Ktonnes     (kt)       7,524               212       544       530       441       1,229       612       652       348       319       2,637  
NSR     ($/t)       9.11               11.88       9.25       9.39       9.18       9.53       11.74       12.75       12.90       7.15       6.82  
Gold     (g/t)       0.366               0.491       0.372       0.378       0.368       0.382       0.481       0.523       0.537       0.282       0.268  
Silver     (g/t)       7.42               6.91       7.47       7.52       7.79       7.95       7.73       8.23       6.53       7.04       7.01  
Recovered Gold     (g/t)       0.212               0.285       0.216       0.219       0.213       0.222       0.279       0.303       0.312       0.166       0.154  
Recovered Silver     (g/t)       1.48               1.38       1.49       1.50       1.56       1.59       1.54       1.63       1.31       1.44       1.39  
Transitional High:                                                                                                        
Ktonnes     (kt)       3,445                                                               9       837       2,599          
NSR     ($/t)       19.97                                                               13.57       18.57       20.45          
Gold     (g/t)       0.765                                                               0.529       0.719       0.781          
Silver     (g/t)       22.10                                                               12.59       18.69       23.23          
Recovered Gold     (g/t)       0.460                                                               0.318       0.431       0.469          
Recovered Silver     (g/t)       3.76                                                               2.14       3.18       3.95          
Transitional Low:                                                                                                        
Ktonnes     (kt)       2,947                                                               7       646       2,285       9  
NSR     ($/t)       15.62                                                               10.79       16.54       15.41       6.88  
Gold     (g/t)       0.722                                                               0.540       0.765       0.712       0.336  
Silver     (g/t)       16.70                                                               3.96       17.67       16.52       4.07  
Recovered Gold     (g/t)       0.356                                                               0.247       0.374       0.352       0.142  
Recovered Silver     (g/t)       3.35                                                               0.76       3.53       3.31       0.75  

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-11

 

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 16-3
End of Year 1, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-12

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 16-4
End of Year 2, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-13

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 16-5
End of Year 3, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-14

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 16-6
End of Year 4, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-15

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 16-7
End of Year 5, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-16

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 16-8
End of Year 6, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-17

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

16.6 Waste Storage Area and Stockpile

 

A waste rock storage area was designed southeast of the pit to hold about 25 million tonnes of waste rock. Figure 16-9 shows the design. The facility is designed with 30m lifts at the angle of repose with a setback between lifts so the overall angle is 3H:1V.

 

The mine plan also produces about 5 million tonnes of low grade material that will be stockpiled and processed at the end of commercial pit production. This is also shown on Figure 16-9.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-18

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 16-9
Mine Waste Storage Area, IMC 2018

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-19

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment   NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

16.7 Mining Equipment

 

Mine major equipment requirements were sized and estimated on a first principles basis based on the mine production schedule, the mine work schedule, and estimated equipment productivity rates. The mine equipment estimate is based on contract-miner operation and assumes a well-managed mining operation with a well-trained labor pool.

 

Table 16-5 shows major equipment requirements by year. This table represents the equipment required to perform the following duties:

 

· Developing access roads from the mine to the crusher, waste storage area, and the low grade stockpile,

· Mining and transporting resource to the crusher or low grade stockpile,

· Mining and transporting waste to the waste storage facility,

· Maintaining the haul roads and waste storage areas.

 

Table 16-5
Mine Major Equipment Fleet Requirement

 

    Capacity/   Time Period
Equipment Type   Power   PP   Y1Q1   Y1Q2   Y1Q3   Y1Q4   2   3   4   5   6   7
Atlas Copco DM30 II Drill   (171 mm)   1   2   3   3   3   3   3   2   2   2   0
Caterpillar 6018FS Hyd Shovel   (10 cu m)   1   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   1
Caterpillar 992K Wheel Loader   (11.5 cu m)   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1
Caterpillar 773G Truck   (53 mt)   2   7   9   10   10   10   12   11   12   11   4
Caterpillar D9T Track Dozer   (306 kw)   3   3   3   3   3   3   3   3   3   2   1
Caterpillar 824H Wheel Dozer   (264 kw)   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   1   1
Caterpillar 14M Motor Grader   (193 kw)   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   1   1
Water Truck - 14,000 gal   (53,000 l)   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   2   1   1
Caterpillar 319DL Excavator   (1.13 cu m)   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   0
Sandvik DX680 TH Drill   (102 mm)   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1   0
TOTAL       16   23   26   27   27   27   29   27   28   23   10

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 16-20

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

17.0 RECOVERY METHODS

 

17.1 Process Design Basis

 

Test work results developed by KCA and others has indicated that part of the Camino Rojo mineral resource is amenable to heap leaching for the recovery of gold. This PEA models a scenario where material is mined by standard open pit mining methods. Material will be crushed at a rate of 18,000 tpd to 80% passing 38mm using a two-stage closed crushing circuit and conveyor stacked on the leach pad in 10m lifts. Lime will be added to the material for pH control before being stacked and leached with a dilute cyanide solution. Pregnant solution will flow by gravity to a pregnant solution pond before being pumped to a Merrill-Crowe plant for metal recovery. Gold and silver will be precipitated from the pregnant solution via zinc cementation. The precious metal precipitate will be dewatered using filters, dried in a mercury retort to remove mercury values, and smelted to produce the final doré product.

 

The process has been designed to process 6.57 million tonnes per year at an average processing rate of 18,000 tpd. The project has an estimated mine life of 6.6 years.

 

A summary of the processing design criteria is presented in Table 17-1.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 17-1
Processing Design Criteria Summary

 

Item Design Criteria
Annual Tonnage Processed 6,570,000 tonnes
Crushing Production Rate 18,000 tonnes/day average
Crushing Operation 8 hours/shift, 3 shifts/day, 7 days/week
Crusher Availability 75%
Crushing Product Size 80% -38mm
Primary Leaching Cycle, days (Total) 80
Average Sodium Cyanide Consumption, kg/t 0.35
Average Lime Consumption, kg/t 1.25
Average Oxide Gold Recovery, Kp 70%
Average Oxide Gold Recovery, Ki 58%
Average Transition-Hi Gold Recovery 60%
Average Transition-Lo Gold Recovery 49%
Average Oxide Silver Recovery, Kp 13%
Average Oxide Silver Recovery, Ki 20%
Average Transition-Hi Silver Recovery 17%
Average Transition-Lo Silver Recovery 20%

 

Electric power will be provided by line power to all elements of the process.

 

An event pond is included to collect contact solution from storm events. Solution collected will be returned to the process as soon as practical.

 

Figure 17-1 shows the overall process flowsheet and Figure 17-2 shows the general arrangement of the mine site.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-2

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 17-1
Mine Process Overall Flowsheet

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-3

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 17-2
Mine General Arrangement

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-4

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

17.2 Crushing

 

ROM material will be transported from the mine in 53-tonne surface haul trucks and dumped in the dump hopper or stockpiled in a ROM stockpile. Stockpiled material will be reclaimed by a front-end loader and fed to the dump hopper as needed, primarily during the four hours per day mine shutdown. Oversized rocks or large lumps will be broken using a rock breaker.

 

Material will be fed from the ROM dump hopper to a vibrating grizzly feeder via an apron feeder. The grizzly oversize will be fed to the jaw crusher and the grizzly undersize will be recombined with the jaw crusher product on the primary crusher discharge conveyor. The primary crusher discharge conveyor transfers primary crushed material to the screen feed conveyor, which feeds the secondary screen. A tramp metal electromagnet and metal detector will be installed on the screen feed conveyor to protect the secondary crushers.

 

Primary crushed material will be fed to the double deck vibrating secondary screen with oversize material being fed to the secondary cone crusher and undersize being transferred to the product stockpile stacker by the undersize transfer conveyor. Oversize material will be crushed by the secondary cone crusher which discharges onto the secondary crushed product conveyor. The secondary crushing circuit will be operated in closed circuit with the secondary crushed product conveyor feeding a recycle conveyor which recycles the cone crusher product to the screen feed conveyor.

 

The secondary screen undersize (crushed product) will be 80% passing 38mm (100% passing 66mm). Crushed product will be transferred to the product stockpile stacker by an undersize transfer conveyor located beneath the secondary screens. The crushed product will be stockpiled in a conical stockpile which will be reclaimed using belt feeders and conveyed to the leach pad for stacking.

 

All of the conveyors will be interlocked so that if one conveyor trips out, all upstream conveyors and the vibrating grizzly feeder will also trip. This interlocking is designed to prevent large spills and equipment damage. Both of these features are considered necessary to meet the design utilization for the system.

 

17.3 Reclamation and Stacking

 

The crushed product stockpile is sized to accommodate a total capacity of approximately 45,000 tonnes (live capacity of approximately 8,300 tonnes). Crushed material will be reclaimed from the stockpile by two belt feeders to a reclaim conveyor in a tunnel below the stockpile. Lime for pH control will be added to the reclaim tunnel conveyor at a rate of 1.25 kg per tonne of material from one 120-tonne silo equipped with a bin activator, variable speed screw feeder, and dust collector. The reclaim conveyor discharges to an overland conveyor which transfers material to the heap stacking circuit.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-5

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The heap will be constructed in 10m-high lifts, in cells 80m wide, using a mobile conveyor stacking system. The first lift will be stacked so that the toe of the heap is 5m from the inside toe of the perimeter berm. The effective overall slope of the heap is approximately 2.5H:1V.

 

The heap stacking system consists of mobile field conveyors (grasshoppers) that transfer the material to the conveyor stacking system, which includes an index feed, horizontal index, and radial stacker conveyors. The mobile grasshopper conveyor chain transfers material from the overland conveyor to the index feed conveyor which feeds the horizontal index conveyor which feeds the radial stacker. The horizontal index and radial stacker are able to retreat and stack material onto the heap. The number of grasshopper conveyors required varies depending on the area of the heap being stacked.

 

Once a lift of cells has finished leaching and is sufficiently drained and dry, a new lift can be stacked over the top of the old lift. The old lift will be cross-ripped prior to stacking new material on top of any old heap area or access road/ramp to break up any compacted or cemented sections.

 

Figure 17-3 illustrates the crushing and reclaim general arrangement.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-6

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 17-3
Crushing & Reclaim

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-7

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

17.4 Leach Pad Design

 

The final location for the leach pad and ponds was selected considering the available area within the Camino Rojo property and the location of other project facilities. The leach pad location also allows for the development of a potential larger pit, which considers mining the entire mineral resource (including sulphide material), without moving the pad. The leach pad will be a single-use, multi-lift type leach pad and has been designed with a lining system in accordance with International Cyanide Code requirements and meets or exceeds the North American standards and practices for lining systems, piping systems and process ponds to lessen the environmental risk of the facilities impacting local soils, surface water and ground water in and around the site.

 

The total pad will be constructed in two phases. The initial or first phase construction will occur during Year -1 (start of construction). The second phase will start in the middle of Year 2. Phase 1 construction includes 440,000 m2 of lined leach pad and phase 2 covers approximately 360,000 m2. The final pad capacity is approximately 46 million tonnes assuming a heap bulk density of 1.45 tonnes/m3.

 

The pad lining system will consist of a 300mm thick clay soil type under liner system overlain by a 2.0mm LLDPE geomembrane liner. Geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) may be used in place of clay soil liner if a suitable clay source is not available. Overliner consisting of crushed low-grade material will be spread over the LLDPE liner at a thickness of 600mm to protect the liner and solution collection piping.

 

Figure 17-4 illustrates the proposed heap leach pad design.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-8

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 17-4
Heap Leach Pad

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-9

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

17.5 Solution Application and Storage

 

The Camino Rojo project will utilize a pregnant solution pond, barren solution tank and event solution pond for solution management.

 

Material will be leached in a single stage using barren solution consisting of a dilute sodium cyanide solution. Barren solution will be pumped from the barren solution tank to the active leach site using a dedicated set of horizontal centrifugal pumps (two operating, one standby) and will be applied to the heap by a system of drip emitters. Drip emitters will be used as they generate less evaporation than sprinklers and will minimize the make-up water requirements. Barren solution will be applied to the heap and an average rate of 10 L/h/m2. Based on metallurgical test work completed to date, a leach cycle of 80 days has been assumed. Concentrated cyanide will be added to the barren solution tank by metering pumps to maintain the cyanide in solution at 200-300 ppm. The barren solution tank is sized for 5 minutes of residence time at the design flow rate of 1,000 m3/h.

 

Pregnant solution containing gold and silver values from the heap drains by gravity to a pregnant solution pond from the heap. Perforated corrugated polyethylene pipes will be placed on the geomembrane liner to facilitate the collection and transport of pregnant leach solution to the pregnant pond.

 

The Pregnant Solution Pond is sized to contain a working volume of 24 hours at the total heap irrigation flow rate, plus a draindown volume equal to 12 hours at the total heap irrigation flow rate. Additionally, the pond has added capacity for incidental storm events of up to approximately 25mm of precipitation over the lined areas. An average 0.5m depth of “dead volume” is reserved in the bottom for accumulation of slimes. The pregnant solution pond will be constructed using two layers of HDPE liner (2mm upper liner and 1.5mm lower liner) with geonet in between over 300mm of clay type soil liner or GCL. Leak detection pipes will be provided beneath the primary and secondary pond liners to allow for monitoring and pumping of solutions from within the leak detection sumps.

 

The pregnant pond will be equipped with three submersible high flow pumps (two operating, one standby) which will pump solution to the Merrill-Crowe recovery circuit. Gold and silver will be precipitated from the pregnant solution by zinc cementation and the resulting barren solution is returned to the barren solution tank.

 

An event pond is included and has been sized to contain a 24 hour, 100 year storm event occurring over the entire lined facility (pad, ponds and collection channels) with a 100% runoff coefficient, but with a deduction for the storm capacity of the pregnant pond, 12 hours of heap drain down, and the maximum monthly wet season accumulation.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-10

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

By incorporating normal working solution and drain down volumes in the Pregnant Solution Pond, it ensures that the Event Solution Pond will be used very infrequently, if at all. During typical operations, normal rainfall events can be accommodated in the Pregnant Pond as long as a significant heap drain down event does not occur at the same time. The solution storage system has been designed so that the barren solution tank overflows to the pregnant solution pond, and the pregnant solution pond overflows to the event pond in case of an emergency or significant storm event.

 

Due its infrequent use, the event pond has been designed with a single 1.5mm HDPE geomembrane liner over 300mm clay soil liner or GCL with a leak detection system. Because this pond is normally empty, it is easy to perform any required maintenance within the pond. The Event Pond will include a pump system to return solution to the active leach circuit.

 

Antiscalant polymer will continuously be added to the leach solutions to reduce the potential for scaling problems within the irrigation system.

 

An emergency backup generator is included and has been sized to run the Merrill-Crowe and solution pumping systems in the event of a power outage.

 

17.6 Process Water Balance

 

The Camino Rojo heap leach system is designed as a zero-discharge facility. The Camino Rojo project area is in a dry region which makes solution management fairly simple. Due to the very limited site rainfall, precipitation control will be based upon the volume needed to store a sudden storm event, using the event pond.

 

Precipitation data has been collected from several weather stations around the Project site. Average precipitation is based on the average precipitation data from the San Tiburcio weather station which is approximately four kilometers from the project site combined with limited data available from the Camino Rojo weather station that was previously on site.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-11

 

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

For the storm event basis for designing the event pond, precipitation analysis from previous studies on the project were used. The design 24hr 100-year storm event is 113mm of precipitation over the lined area.

  

Based on the rainfall data, active water balances were calculated based on the requirement for the full processing tonnage of 18,000 tpd. Water balance spreadsheets were prepared for an average year, wet year, and dry year. For all scenarios, it was determined that the Camino Rojo Project will be in a water deficit and makeup water will be required. Makeup water requirements vary minimally between average, wet, and dry years due to the minimal overall precipitation at the Project site.

 

Table 17-2 summarizes the site-wide average water requirements for an average precipitation year for the Camino Rojo Project including water requirements for the camp, buildings, mining road dust control, etc.

 

Table 17-2
Site-Wide Average Year Water Requirements

 

Description Value Comments
Crusher Dust Control 11.3 From Water Balance "Avg Year Diagram"
Heap Leach Usage 72.2 From Water Balance "Avg Year Diagram"
Road Dust Control 15.0 Allowance
Truck Shop Wash Down 1.0 2.25 m3/h for 45 minutes, 7 times a day = ~0.4 m3/h. Assume 1 m3/h (24 m3/day) allowance.
Camp Usage 4.2 0.25 m³/day per person, assume 400 permanent design population
Buildings    
   - Admin 0.5 allowance for bathroom / potable water
   - Plant Shop & Warehouse 0.5 allowance for misc. usage / spillage / clean-up
   - Mine Shop & Warehouse 1.0 allowance for misc. usage / spillage / clean-up
   - Laboratory 1.0 allowance for misc. usage / clean-up
   - Merrill-Crowe 5.0 allowance for misc. usage / spillage / clean-up
   - Refinery 0.5 allowance for misc. usage / spillage / clean-up
     
TOTAL Water Required 112 m3/h
or 31 l/s

 

Note 1: Wet year reduces average instantaneous water requirement by ~41 m3/h 

Note 2: Dry year increases average instantaneous water requirement by ~4 m3/h

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-12

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

17.7
Merrill-Crowe Recovery Plant

 

A Merrill-Crowe facility will used for gold and silver recovery. The recovery plant will be constructed on a concrete containment slab located outdoors. A shed roof will cover the zinc addition and filter pre-coat circuits. Precipitation filtration and smelting operations will be located in a separate enclosed, secure building. Figure 17-5 shows the Merrill-Crowe recovery plant design.

 

The motor control center will be housed in a separate room proximal to the recovery plant area.

 

The following major plant components are included in the Merrill-Crowe facility:

 

· Four parallel clarification filters

· Filter pre-coat system;

· One deaeration towers;

· Zinc addition circuit;

· Four precipitate filter presses; and

· Miscellaneous pumps.

 

The Merrill-Crowe recovery plant will process precious metal bearing solution from the heap leach pregnant pond.

 

Pregnant solution at the nominal rate of 1,000 m3/h will be pumped to three of the four pressure leaf type clarification filters (three operating, one on backwash/clean/precoat cycle). The filters remove suspended solids down to levels of less than 1 mg/L. Diatomaceous Earth for the clarification filters will be prepared in a body feed mix tank and transferred to a pre-coat mix tank. DE from the pre-coat mix tank will be used to precoat the clarification filters. A portion of body feed solution will be metered into the pregnant feed solution to the clarification filters during operation. The clear pregnant solution then reports to the deaeration tower. Liquid seal ring vacuum pumps (one operating, one standby) provide sufficient degassing capacity to maintain oxygen levels in solution of less than 1 ppm.

 

Deaerated clarified pregnant solution then discharges from the tower and is pumped to three of four precipitate filter presses. Zinc dust will be added at the press feed pump suction to precipitate gold and silver from the deaerated pregnant solution. Precipitated gold and silver from the zinc dust will be collected in the filter presses.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-13

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

Solution discharging from the filter presses is now stripped of gold and silver and is termed barren solution. This barren solution will be returned to the barren solution tank, which acts as a surge tank and a head tank for miscellaneous uses of barren solution within the facility (gland water, wash down, fresh cyanide solution make-up, etc.) as well as irrigation solution for the heap.

 

17.7.1 Refinery

 

Precipitate from the Merrill-Crowe circuit will be processed in the refinery to produce a doré bar. The refinery circuit includes the following major components:

 

· A mercury retort, electric;

· A diesel-fired, tilting crucible furnace;

· A smelting furnace hood and off-gas extraction blower;

· A smelting furnace off-gas scrubber system, and

· A slag granulation circuit

 

The precipitate from the Merrill-Crowe recovery plant will be transferred to the refinery. Periodically, one press will be taken off line and the empty pre-coated press will be put on line. The press taken off line will then be put on a compressed air blow cycle to dry the filtered precipitate. After a four hour blow dry, the press will be opened and the precipitate, with a moisture content ranging from 15 to 20 percent, drops into pans. The pans will be loaded into an electric mercury retort with a fume collection system for drying and removal of mercury before being mixed with fluxes in preparation for smelting. Removed mercury is considered as a hazardous waste and will be transported off site for disposal.

 

The precipitate and flux will then fed to a tilting diesel fired furnace. After melting, slag will be poured off into cast iron molds until the remaining molten furnace charge is mostly molten metal (doré). Doré will be poured off into 40 kg bar molds, cooled, cleaned, and stored in a vault pending shipment to a third-party refiner. The doré poured from the furnace will represent the final product of the processing circuit.

 

Slag will be processed through a granulation circuit, milled, and tabled to remove metal droplets called prills. The classified slag will then be recycled to the heap leach pad via the crushing circuit.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-14

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

A hood will collect the furnace fumes which will pass through a wet scrubbing system to remove particulates. The system will be designed to remove over 96% of the particulates present in the exhaust fumes.

 

17.7.2 Process Reagents and Consumables

 

Average estimated annual reagent and consumable consumption quantities for the process area are shown in Table 17-3.

 

Table 17-3
Projected Annual Reagents and Consumables

 

Item Form Storage Capacity  Annual Consumption
Sodium Cyanide Briquettes - 1 tonne Supersacks 30 days 2,300 tonnes
Lime Bulk Delivery (20 tonne) 5.3 days 8,200 tonnes
Antiscalant Liquid Tote 1 m3 Bins 2 Months 246 m3
Zinc Dry Powder, 50 kg canisters 1 Month 70,300 kg
Diatomaceous Earth Dry Powder, 454 kg Supersacks 1 Month 560 tonnes
Silica Dry Solid Sacks 1 Month 7.3 tonnes
Borax Dry Solid Sacks 1 Month 9.6 tonnes
Niter Dry Solid Sacks 1 Month 3.6 tonnes
Soda Ash Dry Solid Sacks 1 Month 2.4 tonnes
Manganese Dioxide Dry Solid Sacks 1 Month 1.2 tonnes
Diesel – Refinery Only Bulk Delivery (truck) TBD 26 m3

 

17.7.2.1 Lime

 

Lime is assumed to be delivered in 20-tonne pneumatic trucks. Storage will be provided in one 120-tonne silo and the estimated consumption is 1.25 kg/tonne material.

 

Lime from the silos will be metered directly onto the reclaim conveyor via screw feeder.

 

17.7.2.2 Sodium Cyanide

 

Cyanide used for leaching and other process applications will be mixed onsite from briquettes delivered in 1,000 kg bulk bags. A one-month supply of dry cyanide inventory will be kept onsite in case of supply interruptions and is to be stored in a secure, fenced, and roofed area.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-15

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

17.7.2.3 Zinc

 

The zinc dust will be added to the zinc cone every shift and consumption is approximately 195 kg/day at an assumed rate of three times the metal precipitated. An inventory of 75 canisters of 50 kg each should be stored onsite (approximately a 20-day supply).

 

17.7.2.4 Diatomaceous Earth

 

Diatomaceous earth should be mixed every shift in the body tank to pre-coat the filters in the Merrill Crowe plant. A one-month reserve supply should be kept onsite in case of supply interruptions.

 

17.7.2.5 Antiscalant

 

Antiscalant agents will be used to prevent the build-up of scale in the process solution and heap irrigation lines. Antiscalant agent will normally be added to the process pump intakes, or directly into pipelines. Consumption varies depending on the concentration of scale-forming species in the process stream. Delivery will be in liquid form in 1 m3 (1-tonne) bulk containers.

 

Antiscalant will be added directly from the supplier bulk containers into the pregnant and barren pumping systems using variable speed, chemical-metering pumps. On average, antiscalant consumption is expected to be about 10 kilograms per 1,000 m³ (10 ppm) of process solution to be treated (pregnant and barren).

 

17.7.2.6 Fluxes

 

Various fluxes will be used in the smelting process to remove impurities from the bullion in the form of a glass slag. The normal flux components will be a mix of silica sand, borax, and sodium carbonate (soda ash). The flux mix composition is variable and will be adjusted to meet individual project smelting needs: fluorspar and/or potassium nitrate (niter) are sometimes added to the mix. Dry fluxes will be delivered in 25-kg or 50-kg bags. Average consumption of fluxes has been estimated at 1.75 kilograms per kg of gold and silver produced.

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-16

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

  

 

Figure 17-5
Merrill-Crowe Recovery Plant

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 17-17

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

18.0 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE

 

18.1 Infrastructure

 

18.1.1 Existing Installations

 

Existing infrastructure at the Camino Rojo project includes an exploration camp capable of housing approximately 20 people and dirt and gravel roads throughout the property.

 

18.1.2 Site Roads

 

Access to the project site is by the paved four lane Mexican Highway 54 and Route 62, a secondary paved highway that passes through San Tiburcio. Site access roads will be constructed during pre-production and will include approximately 8.4 km of dirt and gravel roads to allow access to all site facilities. A pedestrian bridge will be constructed from the site gate across Highway 54 to allow pedestrian access for workers from San Tiburcio.

 

18.1.3 Mine Haulage Road

 

The mine haul road will handle two-way traffic and is designed to service the pit, crushing circuit, waste rock dump, and mine truck shop.

 

18.1.4 Project Buildings

 

Site buildings for the Camino Rojo project will primarily be prefabricated steel buildings or concrete masonry unit buildings. Figure 18-1 and Figure 18-2 show the mine truck shop, warehouse and administration buildings. Site buildings include:

 

· Administration Building;

· Mine Truck Shop;

· Warehouse;

· Laboratory;

· Guard House;

· MCC buildings; and

· Clinic.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 18-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 18-1
Mine Truck Shop

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 18-2

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 18-2
Lab, Warehouse and Administration Buildings

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 18-3

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

18.1.5 Mine Camp

 

The mine man camp will be constructed early during pre-production and will be used for both construction and operation. The camp will include new dormitory units, bathroom units, laundry units, a kitchen and a dining wall, as well as improvements to the existing exploration camp. The combined occupancy of the improved exploration camp and mine camp will be 250 persons. Orla is undertaking studies on the availability of workers in the local region and has initiated worker training programs. It is anticipated that a significant number of workers could be sourced locally, and a smaller camp than this would be needed for operations.

 

18.1.6 Laboratory

 

A laboratory facility will be constructed near the Merrill-Crowe plant and will process samples from the mine and process. The lab includes a wet lab, atomic adsorption, and fire assay capability with capacity to process up to 150 samples per day.

 

18.1.7 Fuel Storage and Dispensing

 

Fuel for the mining fleet and process mobile equipment will be handled and stored at one central fuel depot facility. All works are assumed to be supplied, installed, and administrated by the fuel distributor as part of a committed contract.

 

18.1.8 Magazine Site

 

The powder magazine includes ANFO and emulsion storage silos as well as two powder magazines. One powder magazine is used to store boosters, detonation cords and accessories used for blasting and the other for storing blasting caps. The powder magazine site will be located northeast of the leach pad and process facilities outside of the pit buffer zone and will be constructed with protective berms around the entire magazine facility. Figure 18-3 illustrates the plan view of the explosives magazine site.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 18-4

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

 

Figure 18-3
Explosives Magazine Site

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 18-5

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

18.2 Power Supply, Communication Systems & IT

 

18.2.1 Power Supply

 

The total estimated attached power for the project is 7.5 MW with an average demand of 4.3 MW.

 

Electrical power to site will be by a 115 kVA, three phase, 60 Hz overhead power line to a metering and switching station. There is a high voltage power line transecting the area near San Tiburcio. However, preliminary indications are that a connection may not be possible close to site and power will have to be brought from a switching yard 70 km away because the current local grid does not have sufficient capacity to meet the power demands for the project.

 

Approximately 70 km of new power line will need to be constructed.

 

In the event of a power failure or interruption, emergency power will be supplied by two diesel-fired backup generators. The emergency generators are sized to supply power to the process solution pumping systems and other critical process equipment.

 

18.2.2 Site Power Distribution

 

Power from the main substation will be at 4,160 V, 3 Phase, 60 Hz and will be further stepped down to 460 V and 110/220 V as necessary.

 

18.2.3 Communication Systems & IT

 

Internet and limited cellular communications are currently available at the project site. These systems will need to be expanded to meet site requirements during operations.

 

18.3 Water

 

18.3.1 Water Balance

 

Based on a water balance around the site, the average make-up water required for the operation is approximately 112 m3/h. Details on the water balance are presented in Section 17.6. Make-up water will be sourced from underground wells around the project site.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 18-6

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

18.3.2 Potable and Domestic Water

 

Potable water is available nearby and will be delivered to site by trucks. Potable water delivered to site will be stored in poly tanks and distributed by a small potable water pump.

 

18.3.3 Fire Water and Protection

 

The fire protection system is composed of pumps and hydrants around the project site. The raw water / fire water storage tank is designed with a minimum water reserve for fire emergencies. A fire water pumping system will be installed at the water tank consisting of an electrically driven and a backup diesel driven pump to assure operation in the event of an electrical outage. A small jockey pump is also included to maintain a constant water pressure on the system.

 

18.4 Sewage

 

Sewage treatment systems will be installed to treat black and gray water waste generated by the mine camps.

 

Sewage generated by the mine and process facilities will be collected and directed to septic systems including septic tanks and drain fields sized for the building occupancy.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 18-7

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

19.0 MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS

 

No market studies were completed and no contracts are in place in support of this Technical Report. Gold production can generally be sold to any of a number of financial institutions or refining houses and therefore no market studies are required.

 

It is assumed that the doré produced at Camino Rojo will be of a specification comparable with other gold and silver producers and as such, acceptable to all refineries.

 

Gold produced by the Camino Rojo project would be sold to Bullion Banks or other financial institutions and the settlement price would be based on the then-current spot price for gold on public markets. There would be no direct marketing of the metal. The base case financial model for the Camino Rojo project utilizes a gold price of US$1,250/oz and a silver price of US$17/oz.

 

There are no contracts material to Orla at this time that are required for property development, including mining, concentrating, smelting, refining, transportation, handling, sales and hedging and forward sales.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 19-1

 

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

20.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT

 

20.1 Environmental Studies

 

Some baseline environmental studies were completed by previous operators of the project. In April 2018, Orla commissioned independent consultants to conduct more complete baseline environmental studies over the project area. These studies are in progress.

 

20.1.1 Project Area Description

 

The description of the Camino Rojo Environmental System (Sistema Ambiental) presented in this report has been summarized from current Federal environmental permits issued for the exploration drill program (SEMARNAT, Delegacion en el Estado De Zacatecas, Subdelegacion de Gestion para la Proteccion Ambiental y Recursos Naturales, 2013).

 

20.1.1.1 Climate

 

The climate is typical of the high altitude Mesa Central, dry and semi-arid. Temperatures commonly range from +30o to 20oC in the summer and 15o to 0o C in the winter. The median annual temperature is 17.1 C and annual precipitation of 337mm mostly during the rainy season in June and July. Wind speeds are variable with maximum wind speeds of 130 to 160 kph during extreme events.

 

20.1.1.2 Soils

 

Soils are dominantly calcisols (soils with high carbonate component) and leptosols (shallow soil over carbonate rock). These soils are not very suitable for agriculture.

 

20.1.1.3 Hydrology

 

The Project is located in Hydrologic Administrative Region III, North Central Basins, in Hydrologic Region Number 37 El Salada, within the RH37C Sierra de Rodriguez Basin characterized by open dendritic drainages.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

20.1.1.4 Physiography

 

The project is located in the Mesa Central physiographic province, dominated by gently sloping valley floor lowlands in basins separated by low hills and/or moderate relief mountains.

 

20.1.1.5 Seismicity

 

The site is in Seismic Zone A - nil to very low seismic activity. It is characterized by zero reported historic significant seismic events and expected temblor-caused soil accelerations of no more than 10% of the acceleration of gravity

 

20.1.1.6 Vegetation

 

The vegetation is dominantly scrub bushes with cacti, maguey, sage and coarse grasses with rare yucca. The site is dominated by matorral desértico micrófilo (small leaved and/or thorny desert scrub less than 4m high, 54%), desert scrub with sown pasture (23%), and matorral desiertico rosetofilo (desert scrub less than 4m high with rosette shaped leaves), with submountain matorral (mesquite shrub woodland, 8%).

 

20.1.1.7 Fauna

 

Twenty-eight vertebrate species were identified in the project area, 19 bird species, 8 mammals, and one reptile. Two species are listed as at risk, and thus may require special consideration, the greater earless lizard (Cophosaurus texanus) and the Harris hawk (Parabuteo unicinctus harrisi).

 

20.1.2 Environmental Management Plans

 

A key corporate objective is to design and build the project in such a way that it does not cause significant adverse effects during construction, operation, closure and post-closure. To aid this objective, a number of Environmental Management Plans will be developed. An outline of some of the key plans is given in this section. These plans will need to be developed further before construction begins. They will also need to be reviewed and revised during the life of the project.

 

Costs for environmental monitoring, management plans and environmental protection measures are included in this study.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-2

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

20.1.2.1 Surface Water Management

 

Orla is currently designing a program of systematic sampling of surface waters draining the project area. Once initiated, this program will be continued through the life of the mine, including reclamation period and post-closure until it has been determined that reclamation has been successful in preventing long-term effects on surface waters.

 

Water diversion structures will be constructed to keep surface water from flowing into the pad, mine pits, waste dumps and other operational areas. Surface drainage from disturbed areas which have no potential to produce chemical or metal contamination will be directed into small ponds to allow sediments to settle out before discharging to the environment.

 

Orla is currently commissioning a detailed investigation of Acid Rock Drainage (ARD) and metal leaching potential. Based upon results of this study, a Mine Waste Handling Plan will be developed before mining commences.

 

20.1.2.2 Ground Water Management

 

Groundwater effects could potentially come from the pad and ponds (if the liners leak) and from the waste rock piles. Therefore, monitoring wells will be constructed below the heap leach pad and waste rock dumps. A systematic sampling program will be developed to ensure any effects the operation has on groundwater are detected and appropriate changes to the operation can be made to negate these effects.

 

20.1.2.3 Air Quality Management

 

The primary potential effect on air quality will be because of dust. Costs for watering the road and dust control at the crushers have been included in this study. An air quality monitoring program will be initiated to ensure worker health and the environment are not adversely affected by air quality.

 

20.1.2.4 Wildlife Management

 

All operational areas will be fenced to keep animals out. A no hunting policy will be enforced amongst workers. Waterfowl are not common in the area. However, if required, a system to keep birds from landing in the operational ponds will be devised.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-3

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Orla has commissioned consultants to develop a cyanide management plan which will include measures to prevent interaction of wildlife with heap leach solutions.

 

20.1.3 Waste Handling

 

20.1.3.1 Hazardous Wastes

 

Special wastes such as waste oil, glycol coolant, solvent fluids, used oil filters, used batteries, and contaminated fuel, will be handled, stored, transported, and disposed of in accordance with appropriate Hazardous Waste Regulations

 

20.1.3.2 Non-hazardous Wastes

 

A site for temporary storage of recyclable materials will be established at the laydown Area. Such items as scrap metal, tires, glass, recyclable plastics and drink containers will be separated, containerized as appropriate, and temporarily stored in the lay down area until sufficient volumes are available for shipment to a recycling point. Non-recyclable and non-hazardous waste will be buried in an on-site landfill.

 

20.1.3.3 Putrescible (Domestic) Waste Disposal

 

Putrescible organic food wastes generated from the camp accommodation facilities will be burned in an on-site incinerator. Ash produced by the incinerator will be buried in the landfill site along with other inert non-recyclable materials.

 

20.1.3.4 Boneyard Storage

 

A location on the mine site will be designated as an outdoor storage or ‘boneyard’ area for placement of items that are not yet ready for disposal, but which may still be of use for spare parts. These items are likely to include equipment parts, vehicles, and pieces of equipment, and metal components. As much of this material as possible, will be utilized during the mine life. Materials remaining in the boneyard at the end of mine life will either be shipped off site for salvage value, or disposed of in the landfill if they meet the criteria for disposal at that location.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-4

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

20.1.3.5 On-site BioRemediation Cell

 

“Land farming” is a commonly used method of soil remediation for hydrocarbon contaminated soil that relies on natural breakdown of hydrocarbons by microbial action. This is done by spreading a shallow layer of contaminated soil onto a lined "bermed" area referred to as a biocell. In the event of a minor hydrocarbon spill on site, the contaminated materials will be treated using a biocell as authorized in the Hazardous Waste Regulation.

 

20.1.3.6 Waste Water (Sewage) Disposal

 

The wastewater disposal systems for the camp and office areas will be engineered, constructed, and maintained under the direction of a qualified professional.

 

20.1.4 Reclamation

 

Reclamation will be undertaken during mining activities where possible, but the majority of work will occur after the completion of mining and final gold recovery. The reclamation land use objective will be to return the land to a grazing area for cattle and wildlife habitat. Closure objectives include securing the site to assure physical safety of people, protecting wildlife, protecting surface and groundwater quality and quantity, minimizing erosion and controlling fugitive dust. To accomplish these objectives, the following key elements will be included in the reclamation plan:

 

1. Chemical stabilization, accomplished through rinsing and neutralizing the heap and stabilizing waste dumps and mine pits

 

2. Physical stabilization, accomplished through slope grooming, and the application of topsoil and revegetation;

 

3. Control of surface waters; and

 

4. Monitoring effluent chemistry from the pad and water draining the mine waste and pit areas.

 

Closure will be accomplished in three stages:

 

1. Concurrent: measures implemented during the operating life of the project;

 

2. Final: measures implemented after cessation of operations; and

 

3. Post-closure: provides for short-term maintenance and long-term monitoring of the closed facilities.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-5

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

An outline of the key components of the reclamation plan is given in this section. Further detailing of these components will be required before construction commences. During operation, the reclamation plan will be revised further.

 

20.1.4.1 Soil Handling

 

All topsoil harvested during construction will be stockpiled for future use. However, the site is expected to be deficient of organic matter and other soils to support revegetation. Therefore, during operations topsoil will be created. This will be done by combining compostable materials with suitable native soils and natural topsoil. The produced topsoil will be stockpiled for future use; this process must start early since green wastes require time to compost before they are suitable to use as soil amendments.

 

Possible sources for organic matter include:

 

· Chipped wood, bark and brush from site clearing activities (from the entire site including the mine and waste dumps), beginning with the initial site clearing and including subsequent phases of expansion of the heap, waste dumps and open pits;

 

· Composted organic fractions from solid wastes (especially food wastes) from the camp and canteen; and

 

· Composted sewage sludge from the on-site disposal systems (ideally composted with the solid waste organic fraction).

 

20.1.4.2 Camp

 

All camp buildings will be removed upon completion of the operation and the area graded and seeded.

 

20.1.4.3 Central Operating Area

 

Prior to reclamation, all hazardous material will be removed from site. All equipment and building in the central operating area, including the office and warehouse, truck shop, Merrill- Crowe plant, generators and fuel handling facility will be dismantled and removed, and the area graded and seeded.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-6

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

20.1.4.4 Mine Pits

 

Water diversion structures around the mine pits will be upgraded if required to ensure long-term operation. Material around the top of pits will be stabilized and fenced off if required but there is no plan to re-contour pit walls.

 

20.1.4.5 Mine Waste Dumps

 

Mine waste dumps and roads will be reclaimed post mining. Mine roads and waste dumps will be re-sloped, re-contoured, have topsoil added, and be re-seeded.

 

Short and longer term monitoring of slope stabilities will be provided until deemed stable.

 

Preliminary results of geochemical testing of samples from core are favorable in terms of the limited acid production and restricted metal leaching properties shown in the results. A review of previous test results on potential waste rock is currently being conducted and confirmatory testing will be undertaken.

 

20.1.4.6 Roads

 

During reclamation, roads will be stabilized and any culverts removed. Except for the access road, surfaces will be scarified and seeded.

 

20.1.5 Closure Activities – Heap Leach Facilities

 

The following activities will be completed during the operating life of the project, beginning in year 3 of operations and continuing until the cessation of operations:

 

20.1.5.1 Engineering, Modeling and Monitoring Systems

 

Laboratory testing to investigate heap neutralization and long-term chemical and physical stability of the heap leach will be initiated in the next few months.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-7

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

In the first years of operation detailed closure and monitoring plans will be developed considering the as-built facilities and the projected as-stacked heap. These plans will be of sufficient detail to allow the start of concurrent closure activities as well as planning for final closure.

 

Laboratory and field data will be collected to support geochemical and heap neutralization modeling and to allow accurate prediction of both the neutralization process and effluent chemistry following closure. Laboratory testing will include leach columns and kinetic testing to simulate long-term geochemistry. Field testing will include testing either pilot heaps or cells created inside the commercial heap to verify the laboratory data. Geochemical modeling will allow predictive modeling of effluent quality from the closed heap.

 

20.1.5.2 Permanent Surface Water Diversion Works

 

As the leach pad expands the lower portions of the surface water diversion systems will be in their final locations, and then they will be upgraded to meet permanent standards for erosion and storm size. This will also apply to the outlet structures and any associated erosion works.

 

20.1.5.3 Permanent Slope Stabilization

 

Once heap slopes are in their permanent configuration and leaching has ceased, final grooming, capping and revegetation of these slopes, along with associated surface water and erosion controls, will be implemented.

 

20.1.5.4 Final Engineering and Monitoring Plans

 

The plans developed during concurrent closure will require final revisions to accommodate both lessons learned and the final configuration of the heap and roads. This will also include final as-built surveys of the facilities.

 

20.1.5.5 Heap Rinsing and Neutralization

 

This process consists primarily of recirculating cleaner water through the heap, and treating the effluent to reduce contained metals and neutralize the pH. Initially the recirculated solutions will be process solutions, diluted by normal rainfall, with pH buffered to normal leaching levels to allow complete extraction of gold, silver and other metals. Once the concentrations of soluble metals are sufficiently low, the pH will be reduced to below 8.0 and rinsing will continue until the target cyanide levels are achieved. Individual areas of the heap, simulating approximately the normal leach areas, will be rinsed and neutralized so that the capacity of the drainage system and plant are properly utilized. Once the target levels for the controlled constituents (pH, metals and CN) are reached, the heap will be allowed to sit idle through at least one wet season and the effluent chemistry monitored to ensure the targets are maintained.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-8

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

If any of the constituents exceed the targets, then rinsing will be repeated. If the geochemical modeling suggests any potential to produce acidic drainage, then the post-rinse pH will be left elevated to off-set this potential.

 

20.1.5.6 Heap Slope Grooming and Slope Stabilization

 

In most cases the heap slopes will remain in the as-stacked configuration, with only clean-up of benches and minor re-grading to promote proper drainage. In some cases where slope stability has been an issue during operations, some flattening of the slopes may be required as part of final closure. The required final slopes will be determined based on testing and analysis. In general, the slopes of the heap will be angle-of-repose lifts followed by nominally flat benches to create a stable over-all slope. Some areas may be graded to combine several benches to allow creation of permanent access roads or other features. The lower portions of the entire perimeter of the heap will be graded so that all exposed liner is covered.

 

20.1.5.7 Topsoil Placement and Revegetation of Heap and Surrounding Areas

 

The crest of the heap and the benches, as well as any disturbed ground in the vicinity (except roads and diversions to remain) will be covered with topsoil, supplemental nutrients as needed, and seed. For high-erosion prone areas some rapid growing, annual species of exotics may be used but the revegetation plan will emphasize the use of locally harvested native species. Experience has shown that locally harvested seeds have the highest survival rates and are the best suited to local soil and climate factors. Over the heap non-food species will be preferred to avoid accumulation of any metals in the food chain.

 

20.1.5.8 Ponds and Pump Stations

 

The solution and emergency ponds and pump stations will remain in place and in service for the first few years to allow management of heap effluents. The ponds may remain in service permanently to provide seasonal water to livestock and wildlife. This is a matter for further consideration.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-9

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

20.1.5.9 Physical and Mobile Equipment

 

Except for the light mobile equipment (truck, backhoe, bulldozer) to remain on-site during the post-closure care and monitoring period, all equipment will be sold for scrap. Most of this equipment will be in serviceable condition and thus will probably be sold at a profit (i.e., sales proceeds exceed decommissioning costs).

 

20.1.5.10 Roads, Diversion Works and Erosion Controls

 

Roads and diversion works that are to remain in service post-closure will be upgraded to meet the closure design. Generally this will mean that the surfacing will be more robust and that the dimensions of drainage facilities will be enlarged to meet a larger design storm. Culverts will be replaced with surface crossings since culverts are only serviceable for 10-20 years (and are targets for theft).

 

20.1.5.11 Fencing

 

All fencing around the pad and pond areas will be removed as the land is intended to return to grazing and wildlife habitat. Further, maintaining fencing would not likely to be successful in the long-term.

 

20.1.6 Post Closure Activities

 

20.1.6.1 Physical Monitoring and Maintenance

 

After the completion of final closure, the site will require regular maintenance for the first approximately 3 years post-closure or until there is no further signs of changing conditions. During this period, the site will be inspected every calendar quarter (3 months) and maintenance activities will be planned immediately following each wet season and following any unseasonal major storm events. The purpose of this is to ensure the drainage and erosion control measures are working as planned, and to allow the recently revegetated areas to mature and properly take hold. Maintenance work will consist of light manual labor (ditch tending, rubble removal, and so forth), and light equipment (backhoe and bulldozer) work to regrade or groom any areas showing signs of distress or erosion.

 

Once the site stops showing signs of seasonal distress and the functionality of the facilities has been field proofed, and when the geochemical performance matches predictive modeling, periodic inspection and maintenance activities can be reduced in frequency; initially to annually and eventually to only after unusually high rainfall periods.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-10

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

20.1.6.2 Geochemical Monitoring and Maintenance

 

The quality of the water draining from the heap will require monitoring and comparison to the predicted chemistry. If the measured water quality significantly varies from that predicted, in an unfavorable manner, then the geochemical model will be revised and new forecasts prepared. In the extreme case additional rinsing and neutralization of the heap may be required. More likely it will only be required to extend the short-term maintenance period.

 

The ponds will remain in service indefinitely. Water collected in the ponds will be tested with each inspection cycle and if the water quality does not meet discharge standards then that water will be recirculated to the heap and/or evaporated. The ponds will likely accumulate sediments and precipitates as water accumulates and evaporates. These sediments will require periodic removal and can be buried within the heap. This will probably continue for at least one year post-closure and may be needed for up to five years, depending upon the effectiveness of the erosion control measures and re-vegetation efforts.

 

20.1.6.3 Biological Monitoring and Maintenance

 

Maintaining a healthy, robust biological system will improve both the physical and geochemical performance of the closed heap. Thus, the periodic inspections will pay special attention to the biological environment, the health of the vegetated areas as well as the health of the down-stream riparian habitats and surrounding vegetative areas. Reseeding and replacement of some topsoil will be planned annually for the first approximately 3 years. Biological monitoring will continue as long as physical monitoring does, and at least until all habitat and vegetative areas have been stable for multiple years and through extreme wet and dry seasons.

 

20.1.6.4 Surplus Water Management

 

If the geochemistry of the heap effluent supports closing the ponds, then they will be decommissioned and closed at such time. The liners will be perforated and the ponds backfilled with permeable waste rock or rinsed leach material. Heap effluent will continue to flow into the backfilled ponds, which will now act as infiltration basins.

 

Alternatively, if the geochemistry is stable and water quality acceptable, one or more of the ponds will be left in place as water storage facilities to support agricultural activities.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-11

 

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

20.2 Permitting

 

Exploration and mining activities in Mexico are subject to control by the Federal agency of the Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources), known by its acronym SEMARNAT, which has authority over the 2 principal Federal permits:

 

i. A Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement), known by its acronym as an MIA, accompanied by a Estudio de Riesgo (Risk Study, hereafter referred to as ER) and:

 

ii. A Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Used Change) permit, known by its acronym as a CUS, supported by an Estudio Tecnico Justificativo (Technical Justification Study, known by its acronym ETJ).

 

Thus far exploration work at Camino Rojo has been conducted under the auspices of two separate MIA permits and corresponding CUS permits. These permits allow for extensive exploration drilling but are not sufficient for mine construction or operation.

 

In April 2018, Orla hired independent environmental permitting consultants to design and implement baseline environmental studies of the Camino Rojo project, and to work with Orla’s consultant engineers to collect the data required for obtaining a Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Statement) and Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Land Use Change) permit.

 

The project is not located in an area with any special Federal environmental protection designation and no factors have been identified that would be expected to hinder authorization of required Federal and State environmental permits. Properly prepared MIA and CUS applications and mine operating permits for a project that does not affect federally protected biospheres or ecological reserves can usually be approved in 6 months.

 

The Peñasquito mine, a large scale, open pit mine, presently operated by Goldcorp, is in the same Municipality and the mine encountered no impediments to receipt of needed permits. Should construction and operation permits be solicited for the Camino Rojo project, no obstacles to obtaining them are anticipated provided that Orla obtains necessary surface rights and design and mitigation criteria meet all applicable standards.

 

Table 20-1 summarizes the Federal, State, and Municipal permits required for mine construction, andTable 20-2 for mine operation and closure. Figure 20-1 summarizes the permitting process.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-12

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 20-1
Permits Required for Mine Construction

 

Mining Stage   Required formality   Agency   Response time
(Aprox.)
  Comments
CONSTRUCTION   OPTION 1   Environmental Impact Manifest (MIA)   SEMARNAT   3-6 months   Baseline studies should be conducted to support the MIA. A comprehensive environmental manifest  shall be prepared and submitted to SEMARNAT for evalutation and authorization.
        Land Use Change Study (ETJ)   SEMARNAT   2 3 months   A detailed forestry inventory and a technical study shall be prepared and submitted to SEMARNATfor evaluation and authorization.
        Risk Analysis Study (ER)   SEMARNAT   3-6 months   A risk analysis shall be prepared and submitted and will be evaluated together with the MIA, when high risk substances such as cyanide is used in the process.
                     
    OPTION 2   Documento Técnico Unificado (DTU)   SEMARNAT   3-6 months   A comprehensive technical document that integrates information of the MIA, ER and ETJ should be prepared and submited to SEMARNAT for evaluation and authorization.
                     
        Land Use/construction Licence   Municipality   1 month   An aplication letter shall be submitted to the municipal authorities to obtain the authoriztion letter.
        Permit for disposal of non-hazardous residues   Municipality   1 month   An aplication letter needs to be submitted to the municipal authorities, specifying the expected type and amount of non-hazardous waste from the mine construction and operation. A response letter should be issue.
        Explosive handling   SEDENA, Municipality  and State Government of Sonora   3 months   An application letter shall be submitted to SEDENA. Also an endorsement letter shall be obtained from the State Government and the Municipality.
        Archeological clearance   INAH   1 to 8 months   A request letter should be submitted to INAH. A survey will be done by INAH personnel and if there is some archeological interest a rescue and documenting program will be performed.
        Water use concessions   CONAGUA   3 months   An application should be submitted before CONAGUA requesting a water use concesion, specifying the volume of water to use per year.
If the aquifer has no availabiltiy, water rights need to be purchased.
The volume of water to use in the mining activities should be measured and paid.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-13

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 20-2
Permits Required for Mine Operation and Closure

 

Mining Stage   Required formality   Agency   Response time
(Aprox.)
  Comments
OPERATION   Water discharge permit   CONAGUA   3 months   An application needs to be filed before CONAGUA with estimated annual volume and the quality of the discharge.  This may include the sannitary service water discharge or any other water discharge to septic tanks or natural environment.
    Operation license   SEMARNAT   2 to 4 months   Needs to do an inventory of all air emissions, water discharges and solid wastes.
    Accident prevention plan   SEMARNAT   None   Based on the risk analysis, it is necessary to establish a plan and procedures to prevent and respond to emergencies and accidental events. SEMARNAT will register this plan.
    Mining residues managament plan   SEMARNAT   None   Need to prepare this plan according to NOM-157-SEMARNAT-2009. SEMARNAT will register this plan
    Hazardous waste generator registry   SEMARNAT   None   It is required to keep records of any hazardous waste movement at the mine facilities and deliveries to an authorized external company.
ABANDONMENT   Closure and reclamation plan   SEMARNAT   Not specified   Need to submit a comprehensive closure and reclamation plan, as early as possible before the closure of the mine.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-14

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

  

Figure 20-1
Permitting Process Flowsheet

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-15

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

20.3 Social and Community Impact

 

In April 2018, Orla commissioned independent consultants to work with Minera Camino Rojo community relations staff to assess social and community impacts of development of the Camino Rojo project.

 

The project has a long association with the local communities, including Community and Social Responsibility Agreements as described in Section 4.3 of this report.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 20-16

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

21.0

CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS

 

This PEA is preliminary in nature and it includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.

 

Capital and operating costs for the process and general and administration components of the Camino Rojo project PEA were estimated by KCA. Costs for the mining components were provided by IMC. The estimated costs are considered to have an accuracy of +/-25% for capital costs and +/-20% for operating costs and are discussed in greater detail in this section.

 

The total capital cost for the Project is US$153.8 million, including US$13.8 million in working capital and not including reclamation and closure costs, IVA (value added tax) or other taxes; all IVA is assumed to be fully refundable. Table 21-1 presents the capital requirements for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Table 21-1
Capital Cost Summary

 

Description   Cost (US$)  
Pre-Production Capital   $ 120,199,000  
Working Capital & Initial Fills   $ 13,789,000  
Mining Contractor Mobilization & Preproduction   $ 4,926,000  
Sustaining Capital – Mine & Process   $ 14,871,000  
Total excluding IVA   $ 153,785,000  

 

The average life of mine operating cost for the Project is US$8.02 per tonne of material processed. Table 21-2 presents the LOM operating cost requirements for the Camino Rojo Project.

 

Table 21-2
LOM Operating Cost Summary

 

Description   LOM Cost (US$/t)  
Mine   $ 3.05  
Process & Support Services   $ 3.20  
Site G & A   $ 1.77  
Total   $ 8.02  

 

IVA is not included in the operating costs.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 21-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

21.1

Capital Expenditures

 

The total pre-production capital cost estimate for the Camino Rojo Project is estimated at US$138.9 million including all process equipment and infrastructure, construction indirect costs, mine contractor mobilization and working capital. All costs are presented in first quarter 2018 US dollars. The estimated capital costs are discussed in this section.

 

Pre-production capital costs required for the Camino Rojo Project are presented in Table 21-3.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 21-2

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 21-3
Summary of Pre-Production Capital Costs by Area

 

Plant Totals Direct Costs   Total Supply Cost     Install     Grand Total  
    US$     US$     US$  
Area 110 - General   $ 7,173,000     $ 790,000     $ 7,963,000  
Area 113 - Crushing   $ 9,457,000     $ 2,081,000     $ 11,538,000  
Area 115 - Material Reclaim and Stacking   $ 6,601,000     $ 604,000     $ 7,205,000  
Area 120 - Heap Leach and Solution Handling   $ 5,832,000     $ 8,096,000     $ 13,928,000  
Area 128 - Merrill-Crowe   $ 6,900,000     $ 1,084,000     $ 7,984,000  
Area 131 - Refining   $ 2,841,000     $ 426,000     $ 3,267,000  
Area 134 - Reagents   $ 345,000     $ 107,000     $ 452,000  
Area 360 - Power   $ 7,758,000     $ 670,000     $ 8,428,000  
Area 362 - Water Supply & Distribution   $ 3,005,000     $ 316,000     $ 3,321,000  
Area 365 - Laboratory   $ 2,322,000     $ 185,000     $ 2,507,000  
Area 367 - Mobile Equipment   $ 3,202,000     $ 0     $ 3,202,000  
                         
Plant Total Direct Costs   $ 55,436,000     $ 14,359,000     $ 69,794,000  
                         
Spare Parts   $ 1,081,000             $ 1,081,000  
                         
Sub Total with Spare Parts                   $ 70,875,000  
                         
Contingency   $ 19,501,000             $ 19,501,000  
                         
Plant Total Direct Costs with Contingency                   $ 90,375,000  
                         
Indirect Costs                   $ 10,845,000  
                         
Other Owner's Costs                   $ 9,038,000  
                         
Initial Fills                   $ 787,000  
                         
EPCM                   $ 9,941,000  
                         
Sub Total Process Costs before Working Capital                   $ 120,986,000  
                         
Working Capital (90 days)                   $ 13,002,000  
                         
Sub Total Overall Costs                   $ 133,988,000  
                         
Mining Costs                   $ 4,926,000  
                         
TOTAL COSTS (excluding IVA)                   $ 138,914,000  

 

Note: Columns may not sum exactly due to rounding

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 21-3

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

21.1.1 Mining Capital Costs

 

IMC has developed an estimate of contract mining costs for the Camino Rojo Project. The estimate is not based on contractor quotes; it has been developed based on considerations of direct mining costs, contractor overhead and profit, and estimated equipment depreciation costs incurred by the contractor.

 

Overall, mining capital costs amount to a total of US$7.5 million, including US$4.9 million for initial capital and US$2.6 million for sustaining capital (including demobilization). Mine Capital Costs are presented in Table 21-4.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 21-4

 

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 21-4
Mining Capital Costs

 

Mine Capital Costs:         Units   PP     Yr1 Q1     Yr1 Q2     Yr1 Q3     Yr1 Q4     Year 2     Year 3     Year 4     Year 5     Year 6     Year 7     TOTAL
Contractor Mobilization (% of Major)   8.0 %   ($x1000)     1,351       532       192       73       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       2,148
Contractor Demobilization (% of Major)   5.0 %   ($x1000)     0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       1,343       1,343
Owner Equipment (% of Major)   4.0 %   ($x1000)     675       266       96       37       0       0       37       0       0       0       0       1,111
Mine Development (From Below)         ($x1000)     2,900       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       2,900
Mine Infrastructure         ($x1000)                                                                                             0
TOTAL MINE CAPITAL COST         ($x1000)     4,926       799       287       110       0       0       37       0       0       0       1,343       7,501

 

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 21-5

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

21.1.1.1 Mining Contractor Mobilization and Demobilization

 

Estimates for contractor mobilization were made based on a preliminary build-up of capital costs for what an owner mine fleet would cost. Mobilization was estimated at 8% of the preliminary mine fleet cost, or US$2.15 million. This includes an allowance of about 4% of the equipment new price for equipment transportation and an additional 4% for logistics, hiring of personnel, procuring supplies/equipment, etc.

 

Demobilization costs were estimated in a similar manner but at 5% of the initial mine fleet cost, or US$1.34 million during Year 7.

 

21.1.1.2 Mining Owner Equipment

 

An allowance for owner equipment is estimated at 4% of the preliminary mine fleet capital cost, or US$1.11 million over the project life. This includes pickup trucks for mine technical services staff, computer equipment, surveying equipment, etc. that are paid directly by the owner and not through the contractor.

 

21.1.1.3 Mine Development (Preproduction)

 

Mine development is estimated at US$2.90 million which is the estimated operating cost to mine 500,000 tonnes of material during the preproduction period.

 

21.1.2 Process and Infrastructure Capital Cost Estimate

 

21.1.2.1 Process and Infrastructure Capital Cost Basis

 

Process and infrastructure costs have been estimated by KCA. All equipment and material requirements are based on the design information described in previous sections of this study. Budgetary capital costs have been estimated primarily based on recent quotes from similar projects in KCA’s database and cost guide data. Where recent quotes were not available, reasonable cost estimates or allowances were made. All capital cost estimates are based on the purchase of equipment quoted new from the manufacturer or to be fabricated new.

 

Each area in the process cost build-up has been separated into the following disciplines, as applicable:

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 21-6

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

· Major earthworks & liner;

· Civil (concrete);

· Structural steel;

· Platework;

· Mechanical equipment;

· Piping;

· Electrical;

· Instrumentation; and

· Infrastructure.

 

Pre-production, non-mining capital costs by discipline are presented in Table 21-5.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 21-7

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 21-5
Summary of Pre-Production Capital Costs by Discipline

 

Plant Totals   Cost @ Source     Freight     Customs
Fees &
Duties
    Total
Supply Cost
    Install     Grand Total  
    US$     US$     US$     US$     US$     US$  
Major Earthworks   $ 3,005,000                     $ 3,005,000     $ 8,705,000     $ 11,710,000  
Civils (Supply & Install)   $ 1,462,000                     $ 1,462,000             $ 1,462,000  
Structural Steelwork (Supply & Install)   $ 841,000                     $ 841,000     $ 616,000     $ 1,457,000  
Platework (Supply & Install)   $ 454,000                     $ 454,000     $ 212,000     $ 666,000  
Mechanical Equipment   $ 23,771,000     $ 1,685,000     $ 606,000     $ 26,062,000     $ 2,689,000     $ 28,751,000  
Piping   $ 2,658,000     $ 173,000     $ 62,000     $ 2,893,000     $ 397,000     $ 3,290,000  
Electrical   $ 10,450,000     $ 395,000     $ 142,000     $ 10,987,000     $ 1,046,000     $ 12,033,000  
Instrumentation   $ 716,000     $ 72,000     $ 26,000     $ 814,000     $ 199,000     $ 1,013,000  
Infrastructure & Buildings   $ 8,135,000     $ 568,000     $ 213,000     $ 8,916,000     $ 496,000     $ 9,412,000  
Spare Parts   $ 1,081,000                     $ 1,081,000             $ 1,081,000  
Contingency   $ 19,501,000                     $ 19,501,000             $ 19,501,000  
                                                 
Plant Total Direct Costs   $ 72,074,000     $ 2,893,000     $ 1,049,000     $ 76,016,000     $ 14,360,000     $ 90,376,000  

 

Freight, customs fees and duties, and installation costs are also considered and are discussed in the following sections.

 

Engineering, procurement, and construction management (EPCM), indirect costs, and initial fills inventory are also considered as part of the capital cost estimate.

 

21.1.2.2 Freight

 

Estimates for process equipment freight costs are based on loads as bulk freight and have been estimated at 10% of the equipment cost.

 

21.1.2.3 Duties and Customs Fees

 

Estimates for duties and customs fees are estimated at 3.6% of the mechanical equipment cost.

 

21.1.2.4 Installation

 

Installation estimates for the equipment are based on the equipment type and include all installation labor and equipment usage. Average installation costs are estimated at US$35 per hour.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 21-8

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

21.1.2.5 Major Earthworks and Liner

 

Earthworks quantities for the project have been estimated by KCA based on the overall area requirements. Geomembrane liners for the leach pad and process solution ponds are included in this category. Earthworks and liner unit rates are based on recent contractor quotes in KCA’s files for a project recently completed in Mexico.

 

21.1.2.6 Civils

 

Civils include detailed earthworks and concrete. Concrete quantities have been estimated based on similar equipment installations, major equipment weights and on slab areas. Unit costs for concrete are based on recent contractor quotes in KCA’s files for projects completed in Mexico.

 

21.1.2.7 Structural Steel

 

Costs for structural steel, including steel grating, structural steel, and handrails have been estimated based on general layouts and structural steel requirements for similar installations. Unit rates for structural steel are based on recent contractor quotes in KCA’s files for projects completed in Mexico.

 

21.1.2.8 Platework

 

The platework discipline includes costs for the supply and installation of steel tanks, bins, and chutes. Platework costs are primarily based on similar items from recent projects in KCA’s files.

 

21.1.2.9 Mechanical Equipment

 

Costs for mechanical equipment are based on a preliminary equipment list developed of all major equipment for the process. Costs are based on recent quotes from KCA’s files for similar items and cost guide information. Where recent quotes were not available, reasonable allowances have been made. All costs assume equipment purchased new from the manufacturer or to be fabricated new.

 

Installation hours for mechanical equipment is factored based on the equipment supply cost and includes installation labor and equipment usage.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 21-9

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

21.1.2.10 Piping, Electrical and Instrumentation

 

Major piping, including heap irrigation and gravity drain pipes are based on recent estimates from similar sized projects in Mexico. Additional ancillary piping, fittings, and valve costs have been estimated on a percentage basis of the mechanical equipment costs.

 

Electrical and instrumentation costs have been estimated primarily as percentages of the mechanical equipment supply cost for each process area. A US$7 million allowance is included in the electrical estimate for running a 70 km power line to the project site.

 

21.1.2.11 Infrastructure

 

Infrastructure for the Camino Rojo Project includes the construction of a 250-person man camp for operations and construction, a pedestrian bridge crossing the nearby highway, an administration building, mine truck shop, warehouse, guard house, on-site clinic and powder magazine. Process buildings including the laboratory, Merrill-Crowe plant and refinery are also included.

 

Water supply to the main water tank will be by three production wells. The production wells consider 200mm cased wells in 350mm boreholes and have an estimated cost of US$385,000 each, including the cost of the well pump, discharge pipe and sub cable. An allowance of US$360,000 is also included for six monitoring wells.

 

21.1.2.12 Process Mobile Equipment

 

Mobile equipment included in the capital cost estimate are detailed in Table 21-6.

 

Table 21-6
Process Mobile Equipment

 

Description   Quantity  
CAT 992 Loader or Equiv.     1  
CAT D6 Dozer or Equiv.     1  
Mechanical Service Truck     1  
Forklift, 2.5 ton     2  
Telehandler, 4 ton     1  
Pickup Truck, ¾ ton     7  
Backhoe w/ Fork Attachment, 1.1 cu. yd.     1  
Boom Truck, 10 ton     1  
Crane, 70 ton     1  
Ambulance     1  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 21-10

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

21.1.2.13 Spare Parts

 

Spare parts costs are estimated at 6% of the mechanical equipment supply costs.

 

21.1.3 Construction Indirect and Other Owner’s Costs

 

Indirect field costs include temporary construction facilities, construction services, quality control, survey support, warehouse and fenced yards, support equipment, etc. These costs have been estimated at US$10.8 million, or 12% of the total direct costs. Owner’s costs are estimated at US$9 million, or 10% if the total direct costs which include G&A costs during construction.

 

Engineering, procurement and construction management costs are estimated at US$9.9 million, or 11% of the total direct costs.

 

21.1.4 Initial Fills Inventory

 

The initial fills consist of consumable items stored on site at the outset of operations, which includes sodium cyanide (NaCN), lime, zinc, diatomaceous earth (DE), and fluxes. The inventory of initial fills are estimated at US$800,000 and are to ensure that adequate consumables are available for the first stage of operation.

 

21.1.5 Contingency

 

Contingency is included in the capital cost estimate and has been considered by discipline as a percentage of the direct capital costs. The overall contingency is US$19.5 million, or approximately 28% of the direct costs.

 

21.1.6 Working Capital

 

Working capital is money that is used to cover operating costs from start-up until a positive cash flow is achieved. Once a positive cash flow is attained, project expenses will be paid from earnings. Working capital for the Project is estimated to be US$13.0 million based on 90 days of operation and includes all mine, process and G&A operating costs.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 21-11

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

21.1.7 Sustaining Capital

 

Sustaining capital for project includes the expansion of the heap leach pad and addition of an overland conveyor in Year 2 of operation, and mining sustaining costs. Total sustaining capital is estimated at US$14.9 million.

 

21.2 Operating Costs

 

Process operating costs for the Camino Rojo project have been primarily estimated by KCA based upon unit consumptions and, where possible, have been broken down by area. Mining costs were provided by IMC at US$1.81 per tonne moved (LOM US$3.05 per tonne of material processed) and assumes contract mining. LOM average processing costs are estimated at US$3.20 per tonne processed. G&A costs are estimated at US$1.77 per tonne processed.

 

Process operating costs have been estimated from first principles. Labor costs were estimated using project specific staffing, salary and wage and benefit requirements. Unit consumptions of materials, supplies, power, water and delivered supply costs were also estimated.

 

The process operating costs presented are based upon the ownership of all process production equipment and site facilities. The owner will employ and direct all operating maintenance and support personnel for all site activities.

 

Operating costs were estimated based on 1st quarter 2018 US dollars and are presented with no added contingency based upon the design and operating criteria present in this report. Operating costs are considered to have an accuracy of +/- 20%.

 

Operating costs estimates have been based upon information obtained from the following sources:

 

· Contractor mining costs from IMC;

· Some G&A costs from Orla;

· Project metallurgical test work and process engineering;

· Recent KCA project file data; and

· Experience of KCA staff with other similar operations.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 21-12

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Where specific data does not exist, cost allowances have been based upon consumption and operating requirements from other similar properties for which reliable data exists. Freight costs have been estimated where delivered prices were not available.

 

21.2.1 Mining Operating Costs

 

Mining operating costs have been developed by IMC based on estimated owner mining costs plus contractor overhead, equipment depreciation and profit. Total contract mine operating cost during commercial production is estimated at US$129.6 million. This amounts to US$1.81 per total tonne moved or US$3.05 per processed tonne. The US$1.81 unit cost includes the cost and tonnage for rehandle of the low-grade stockpile, but excludes tonnage moved and costs incurred during the preproduction period. Preproduction costs are reported as mine development capital.

 

Estimated mining contractor costs are presented in Table 21-7.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates    
June 19, 2018   Page 21-13

 

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 21-7
Contract Mining Cost Summary

 

    Units   PP     Yr1 Q1     Yr1 Q2     Yr1 Q3     Yr1 Q4     Year 2     Year 3     Year 4     Year 5     Year 6     Year 7     TOTAL  
Owner Operating Cost   ($x1000)     2,380       3,502       4,416       4,449       4,510       18,192       18,593       17,599       17,693       13,977       3,006       108,317  
Less Technical Services and Supplies   ($x1000)     259       262       259       259       259       1,041       1,041       1,041       1,041       634       146       6,242  
Less Fuel (Owner Supplied)   ($x1000)     480       1,027       1,339       1,351       1,376       5,594       5,805       5,503       5,488       4,158       1,037       33,158  
Less Blasting (Separate Contract)   ($x1000)     96       424       715       725       731       2,905       2,887       2,489       2,252       1,576       0       14,802  
Contractor Direct Cost   ($x1000)     1,544       1,789       2,102       2,113       2,143       8,652       8,859       8,567       8,913       7,609       1,823       54,114  
Contractor Depreciation Charge   ($x1000)     288       541       660       664       672       2,715       2,782       2,633       2,604       1,920       556       16,035  
Contractor Overhead/Profit @15.0%   ($x1000)     232       268       315       317       322       1,298       1,329       1,285       1,337       1,141       273       8,117  
Total Contract Mining Cost   ($x1000)     2,064       2,598       3,077       3,094       3,137       12,664       12,971       12,485       12,853       10,670       2,653       78,266  
Add Back Technical Services and Supplies   ($x1000)     259       262       259       259       259       1,041       1,041       1,041       1,041       634       146       6,242  
Add Back Fuel   ($x1000)     480       1,027       1,339       1,351       1,376       5,594       5,805       5,503       5,488       4,158       1,037       33,158  
Add Back Blasting   ($x1000)     96       424       715       725       731       2,905       2,887       2,489       2,252       1,576       0       14,802  
TOTAL OPERATING COST - Commercial   ($x1000)             4,311       5,391       5,430       5,504       22,204       22,704       21,517       21,634       17,038       3,836       129,569  
TOTAL OPERATING COST - Development   ($x1000)     2,900                                                                                       2,900  
Total Material Moved (includes 5 M tonnes rehandle)   (kt)     0       2,352       3,281       3,318       3,324       13,123       12,954       11,154       10,095       8,045       3,879       71,525  
Total Processed   (kt)     0       821       1,642       1,642       1,643       6,570       6,570       6,570       6,570       6,570       3,879       42,477  
Cost Per Total Tonne   (US$/t)     0.000       1.833       1.643       1.637       1.656       1.692       1.753       1.929       2.143       2.118       0.989       1.812  
Cost Per Processed Tonne   (US$/t)     0.000       5.251       3.283       3.307       3.350       3.380       3.456       3.275       3.293       2.593       0.989       3.050  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 21-14

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

21.2.1.1 Contract Mining Cost Basis

 

The contract mining cost estimate is based on an estimated owner mining scenario plus contractor profit and overhead. The estimate includes:

 

· Owner operating cost from first principles;
· Mine technical services and supplies;
· Fuel and blasting;
· Contractor equipment depreciation; and
· Contractor overhead and profit.

 

The contractor direct operating cost is estimated as the owner operating cost, less the mine technical services, fuel and blasting costs, which are assumed as the owner’s costs and are added back after considering contractor depreciation and profit. Contractor overhead and profit is estimated at 15% of the direct mining costs.

 

21.2.1.2 Mine Technical Services, Fuel and Blasting Costs

 

Costs for mine technical services, fuel and blasting are considered as direct owner costs and are not subject to contractor markup.

 

Mine technical services and supplies includes the cost for engineering, geology, surveying and grade control personnel, and an allowance for supplies. These costs are estimated at US$6.24 million over the project life.

 

Fuel and blasting supplies will be contracted by the owner with different parties and will not be provided by the mining contractor. Fuel and blasting costs are estimated at US$33.2 million and US$14.8 million, respectively, over the mine life.

 

21.2.1.3 Contractor Equipment Depreciation

 

The contract mining cost will include significant charges for equipment depreciation. Table 21-8 shows IMC’s estimates of these costs; it is not certain how a specific contractor will calculate these values. The top portion of the table shows the estimated number of operating shifts for each equipment type for each year. The bottom portion of the table shows IMC’s estimate of depreciation charges per shift to be applied to each equipment type and total annual charges. A 15% allowance has also been added to account for small equipment.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 21-15

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Life of mine the depreciation charge is US$16.0 million. This compares to US$37.26 million life of mine equipment capital costs for the owner operation case, about 43% of the capital cost. Equipment depreciation is 30% of the direct operating cost estimate of US$54.1 million.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 21-16

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 21-8
Contract Mining Equipment Depreciation

 

                Units   PP     Yr1 Q1     Yr1 Q2     Yr1 Q3     Yr1 Q4     Year 2     Year 3     Year 4     Year 5     Year 6     Year 7     TOTAL
MAJOR EQUIPMENT SHIFTS:                                                                                                                
Atlas Copco DM30 II Drill                   (shifts)     39       170       298       302       305       1,214       1,209       1,043       944       661       0     6,186
Caterpillar 6018FS Hyd Shovel                   (shifts)     36       169       274       278       281       1,118       1,112       958       867       672       256     6,023
Caterpillar 992K Wheel Loader                   (shifts)     27       128       127       127       125       480       461       396       358       300       197     2,726
Caterpillar 773G Truck                   (shifts)     194       888       1,260       1,274       1,333       5,614       6,221       6,190       6,596       5,704       1,040     36,315
Caterpillar D9T Track Dozer                   (shifts)     364       368       364       364       364       1,460       1,460       1,460       1,460       730       180     8,574
Caterpillar 824H Wheel Dozer                   (shifts)     182       184       182       182       182       730       730       730       730       365       180     4,377
Caterpillar 14M Motor Grader                   (shifts)     182       184       182       182       182       730       730       730       730       365       180     4,377
Water Truck - 14,000 gal                   (shifts)     182       184       182       182       182       730       730       730       730       365       180     4,377
Caterpillar 319DL Excavator                   (shifts)     120       121       120       120       120       482       482       482       482       365       0     2,894
Sandvik DX680 TH Drill                   (shifts)     120       121       120       120       120       482       482       482       482       482       0     3,011
Total Major Equipment Shifts                   (shifts)     1,446       2,519       3,109       3,132       3,194       13,040       13,617       13,201       13,380       10,010       2,213     78,861
MAJOR EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION COST:             Depr                                                                                                  
              ($/shift)                                                                                                  
Atlas Copco DM30 II Drill             89.1     ($x1000)     3       15       27       27       27       108       108       93       84       59       0     551
Caterpillar 6018FS Hyd Shovel             479.0     ($x1000)     17       81       131       133       135       535       533       459       416       322       123     2,885
Caterpillar 992K Wheel Loader             577.5     ($x1000)     16       74       73       73       72       277       266       228       207       173       114     1,574
Caterpillar 773G Truck             120.0     ($x1000)     23       107       151       153       160       674       746       743       792       685       125     4,358
Caterpillar D9T Track Dozer             223.7     ($x1000)     81       82       81       81       81       327       327       327       327       163       40     1,918
Caterpillar 824H Wheel Dozer             150.9     ($x1000)     27       28       27       27       27       110       110       110       110       55       27     660
Caterpillar 14M Motor Grader             93.2     ($x1000)     17       17       17       17       17       68       68       68       68       34       17     408
Water Truck - 14,000 gal             213.6     ($x1000)     39       39       39       39       39       156       156       156       156       78       38     935
Caterpillar 319DL Excavator             41.7     ($x1000)     5       5       5       5       5       20       20       20       20       15       0     121
Sandvik DX680 TH Drill             176.8     ($x1000)     21       21       21       21       21       85       85       85       85       85       0     532
MAJOR EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION COST             ($x1000)     251       470       574       578       585       2,360       2,419       2,289       2,264       1,670       484     13,943
SMALL EQUIPMENT @     15.00 %           ($x1000)     38       71       86       87       88       354       363       343       340       250       73     2,092
TOTAL EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION COST             ($x1000)     288       541       660       664       672       2,715       2,782       2,633       2,604       1,920       556     16,035

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 21-17

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 21-9 shows IMC’s estimate of annual depreciation costs for each equipment type. The equipment replacement cost is the new, delivered price used for the owner operation case. The column labeled IMC Life shows the life of the equipment, in metered hours, that IMC used for equipment replacement calculations. IMC deducted 10,000 hours from each piece of equipment to obtain the adjusted equipment life. This can be thought of as accelerated depreciation or a risk premium for the contractor. Assuming a 10% salvage value for equipment, and straight-line depreciation, the equipment depreciation per metered hour and per shift are shown. This is based on 8.75 metered hours per shift.

 

Table 21-9
Contractor Equipment Depreciation

 

    Replace.     IMC Equip     Contractor     Depreciation (Notes 1,2)  
  Cost     Life     Life     Per Hr     Per Shift  
Equipment Type   (US$)     (hrs)     (hrs)     ($/hr)     ($/shift)  
Atlas Copco DM30 II Drill     565,700       60,000       50,000       10.18       89.10  
Caterpillar 6018FS Hyd Shovel     2,433,200       50,000       40,000       54.75       479.04  
Caterpillar 992K Wheel Loader     2,200,000       40,000       30,000       66.00       577.50  
Caterpillar 773G Truck     914,300       70,000       60,000       13.71       120.00  
Caterpillar D9T Track Dozer     1,136,500       50,000       40,000       25.57       223.75  
Caterpillar 824H Wheel Dozer     766,300       50,000       40,000       17.24       150.87  
Caterpillar 14M Motor Grader     473,300       50,000       40,000       10.65       93.18  
Water Truck - 14,000 gal     1,085,000       50,000       40,000       24.41       213.61  
Caterpillar 319DL Excavator     211,665       50,000       40,000       4.76       41.67  
Sandvik DX680 TH Drill     673,700       40,000       30,000       20.21       176.85  

 

Note 1: Depreciation assumes 10% salvage value, i.e. hourly depreciation = 0.9 x cost / life

Note 2: Assumes 8.75 metered hours per shift

 

21.2.2 Process and G&A Operating Costs

 

Average process and G&A operating costs based on 18,000 tpd material being processed in presented in Table 21-10.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 21-18

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 21-10
Process, Support & G&A Operating Cost

 

                      US$ per  
          Unit     Annual     Tonne  
    Units   Qty     Costs, US$     Costs, US$     Processed  
Labor                                    
Process   ea     132             $ 2,652,234     $ 0.404  
Laboratory   ea     20             $ 389,571     $ 0.059  
SUBTOTAL                       $ 3,041,805     $ 0.463  
                                     
Crushing                                    
Power   kWh/t     1.507     $ 0.100     $ 989,972     $ 0.151  
992 Loader   h/mo     426     $ 105.98     $ 541,558     $ 0.082  
Wear                       $ 1,314,000     $ 0.200  
Overhaul & Maintenance                       $ 657,000     $ 0.100  
SUBTOTAL                       $ 3,502,530     $ 0.533  
                                     
Reclaim & Convey/Stacking                                    
Power   kWh/t     1.080     $ 0.100     $ 709,684     $ 0.108  
D-6 Dozer   h/mo     480     $ 32.12     $ 185,011     $ 0.028  
Maintenance Supplies   lot                   $ 328,500     $ 0.050  
SUBTOTAL                       $ 1,223,195     $ 0.186  
                                     
Heap Leach Systems                                    
Power   kWh/t     0.943     $ 0.100     $ 619,743     $ 0.094  
Piping   lot                   $ 197,100     $ 0.030  
Maintenance Supplies   lot                   $ 65,700     $ 0.010  
SUBTOTAL                       $ 882,543     $ 0.134  
                                     
Merrill-Crowe                                    
Power   kWh/t     0.545     $ 0.100     $ 358,161     $ 0.055  
DE   kg/day     1,534     $ 0.800     $ 449,141     $ 0.068  
Zinc   kg/yr     48,837     $ 7.49     $ 365,964     $ 0.056  
Filter Cloths (Press)   sets/year     15     $ 8,000.00     $ 120,000     $ 0.018  
Filter Cloths (Clarifier)   sets/year     5     $ 8,000.00     $ 40,000     $ 0.006  
Misc. Operating Supplies   lot                   $ 131,400     $ 0.020  
SUBTOTAL                       $ 1,464,666     $ 0.223  
                                     
Refinery                                    
Power   kWh/t     0.060     $ 0.100     $ 39,098     $ 0.006  
Diesel (Furnace)   L/mo     2565     $ 0.810     $ 24,935     $ 0.004  
Misc. Operating Supplies   lot                   $ 131,400     $ 0.020  
Maintenance Supplies   lot                   $ 65,700     $ 0.010  
SUBTOTAL                       $ 261,133     $ 0.040  
                                     
Reagents                                    
Power   kWh/t     0.009     $ 0.100     $ 6,043     $ 0.001  
Lime   kg/t     1.250     $ 0.170     $ 1,396,125     $ 0.213  
Cyanide   kg/t     0.35     $ 2.50     $ 5,748,750     $ 0.875  
Antiscalant   ppm     10.0     $ 2.48     $ 611,915     $ 0.093  
Fluxes   kg/oz     0.054     $ 1.50     $ 42,399     $ 0.006  
Maintenance Supplies   lot                   $ 65,700     $ 0.010  
SUBTOTAL                       $ 7,870,931     $ 1.198  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 21-19

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

                      US$ per  
          Unit     Annual     Tonne  
    Units   Qty     Costs, US$     Costs, US$     Processed  
Water Supply & Distribution                                    
Power   kWh/t     0.257     $ 0.100     $ 168,724     $ 0.026  
Maintenance Supplies   lot                   $ 131,400     $ 0.02  
SUBTOTAL                       $ 300,124     $ 0.046  
                                     
Laboratory                                    
Power   kWh/t     0.338     $ 0.100     $ 221,738     $ 0.034  
Assays, Solids   No/d     150     $ 7.00     $ 383,250     $ 0.058  
Assays, Solutions   No/d     100     $ 3.00     $ 109,500     $ 0.017  
Misc. Supplies   lot                   $ 131,400     $ 0.020  
SUBTOTAL                       $ 845,888     $ 0.129  
                                     
Support Services / Facilities                                    
Power   kWh/t     0.311     $ 0.10     $ 204,491     $ 0.031  
Fork Lift, 2.5 t   h/mo     180     $ 7.82     $ 16,891     $ 0.003  
Telehandler   h/mo     120     $ 10.03     $ 14,443     $ 0.002  
Boom Truck 10 t   h/mo     90     $ 10.00     $ 10,800     $ 0.002  
Backhoe/loader   h/mo     180     $ 15.09     $ 32,594     $ 0.005  
Pickup Trucks (7)   km/d     350     $ 0.63     $ 80,483     $ 0.012  
Maintenance Truck   km/d     100     $ 0.63     $ 22,995     $ 0.004  
Crane - Rough Terrain   h/mo     24     $ 25.04     $ 7,212     $ 0.001  
Bobcat   h/mo     180     $ 8.00     $ 17,280     $ 0.003  
Maintenance Supplies   lot                   $ 131,400     $ 0.020  
SUBTOTAL                       $ 538,589     $ 0.082  
                                     
TOTAL COST (process Only)                       $ 19,931,405     $ 3.034  
                                     
G&A                                    
G&A Labor   ea     110             $ 1,986,653     $ 0.302  
G&A Expenses                       $ 5,000,000     $ 0.761  
CSR and Ejido                       $ 1,100,000     $ 0.167  
Land Access Agreements                       $ 1,200,000     $ 0.183  
Water Rights                       $ 1,300,000     $ 0.198  
Concessions (1/4 Total Property)                       $ 500,000     $ 0.076  
TOTAL COST G&A                       $ 11,086,653     $ 1.687  
                                     
TOTAL COST PROCESS & G&A                       $ 31,018,058     $ 4.721  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 21-20

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

21.2.2.1 Personnel and Staffing

 

Staffing requirements for process and administration personnel have been estimated by KCA based on experience with similar sized operations. Total process personnel is estimated at 152 persons including 20 laboratory workers. G&A labor is estimated at 110 persons. Mining labor will be provided by the mining contractor and is considered in the mining cost estimate.

 

21.2.2.2 Power

 

Power usage for the process and process-related infrastructure was derived from estimated connected loads assigned to powered equipment from the mechanical equipment list. Equipment power demands under normal operation were assigned and coupled with estimated on-stream times to determine the average energy usage and cost.

 

The total attached power for the process and infrastructure is estimated at 7.5 MW, with an average draw of 4.3 MW. The total consumed power for these areas is approximately 5.05 kWh/t material processed. Power will be supplied to the project site by an overhead power line with an average estimated cost of US$0.10/kWh. Additional power supply studies are in progress to determine the power supply cost for the project, including power line and substation requirements.

 

21.2.2.3 Consumable Items

 

Operating supplies have been estimated based upon unit costs and consumption rates predicted by metallurgical tests and have been broken down by area. Freight costs are included in all operating supply and reagent estimates. Reagent consumptions have been derived from test work and from design criteria considerations. Other consumable items have been estimated by KCA based on KCA’s experience with other similar operations.

 

Operating costs for consumable items have been distributed based on tonnage and gold/silver production or smelting batches, as appropriate.

 

21.3 Reclamation & Closure Costs

 

Costs for concurrent reclamation and closure costs have been estimated at US$0.50 per tonne of material processed, or approximately US$21.2 million over the life of the project. These costs are in addition to any reclamation and closure costs considered in the normal operating and sustaining cost estimates.

 

Activities included as part of reclamation and closure are described in Section 20.1.4 of this Report.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 21-21

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

22.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

 

This PEA is preliminary in nature and it includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.

 

22.1 Summary

 

Based on the estimated production schedule, capital costs and operating costs, a cash flow model was prepared by KCA for the economic analysis of the Camino Rojo Project. All of the information used in this economic evaluation has been taken from work completed by KCA and other consultants working on this project as described in previous sections of this study.

 

The project economics were evaluated using a discounted cash flow (DCF) method, which measures the Net Present Value (NPV) of future cash flow streams. The final economic model was developed by KCA based on the following methods:

 

· The cash flow model is based on the preliminary mine production schedule from IMC.
· The period of analysis is nine years including one year of pre-production, seven years of production and one year for reclamation and closure.
· All cash flow amounts are in US dollars (US$). All costs are considered to be 1st quarter 2018 costs. Inflation is not considered in this model.
· The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is calculated as the discount rate that yields a zero Net Present Value (NPV).
· The NPV is calculated by discounting the annual cash back to Year -1 and different discount rates. All annual cash flows are assumed to occur at the end of each respective year.
· The payback period is the amount of time, in years, required to recover the initial construction capital cost.
· Working capital is considered in this model and includes mining, processing and general administrative operating costs. The model assumes working capital is recovered during the final two years of operation.
· Royalties and government taxes are included in the model.
· 100% equity financing is assumed.
· Salvage value for process equipment is considered and is applied at the end of the project.
· Reclamation and closure costs are included.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 22-1

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

General assumptions for the model, including cost inputs, parameters, royalties and taxes are as follows:

 

· Gold price of US$1,250/oz.
· Silver prize of US$17/oz.
· Gold and silver production and revenue in the model are delayed from the time material is stacked to account for time required for gold to be recovered from the heap. This results in an estimated 15% of the recoverable values being delayed until the following year.
· Pre-production capital costs for the project are spent entirely in Year -1. Sustaining capital for the heap leach pad expansion is spent in Year 2. Sustaining costs for the mine are spent in Years 1, 3 and 7. Capital cost estimates are presented in greater detail in Section 21.0 of this report.
· IVA is applied at 16% to all capital costs as a part of this model and is assumed to be 100% refundable the following year. IVA is not applied to operating costs.
· A 2% NSR is included for royalty agreements with Goldcorp.
· A 0.5% NSR is included and payable to the government as an “extraordinary mining duty”.
· An income tax of 30% is considered.
· A 7.5% mining tax is included and is based on EBITDA less exploration and deductible earthworks costs.
· A refinery and transportation cost of US$1.40/oz for gold and US$1.20/oz for silver is used in the model, including insurance. Gold and silver are assumed to be 99.9% and 98% payable, respectively.
· By-product cash operating costs per payable ounce represent the mine site operating costs including mining, processing, metal transport, refining, administration costs and royalties with a credit for silver produced. Operating costs are presented in greater detail in Section 21.0 of this report.
· All in sustaining costs per payable ounce represent the mine site operating costs including mining, processing, metal transport, refining, administration costs and royalties with a credit for silver produced as well as the LOM sustaining capital and reclamation and closure costs.
· The cash flow analysis evaluates the project on a stand-alone basis. No withholding taxes or dividends are included. No head office or overheads for the parent company are included.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 22-2

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

A summary of the key economic parameters is shown in Table 22-1.

 

Table 22-1
Key Economic Parameters

 

Item   Value     Units
Au Price     1,250     US$/oz
Ag Price     17     US$/oz
Au Avg. Recovery     67     %
Ag Avg. Recovery     15     %
Treatment Rate     18,000     t/d
Refining & Transportation Cost, Au     1.40     US$/oz
Refining & Transportation Cost, Au     1.20     US$/oz
Payable Factor, Au     99.9     %
Payable Factor, Ag     98.0     %
             
Annual Produced eqAu, Avg.     103     koz
Income & Corporate Tax Rate     30     %
Royalties     2.50     %
             
After-Tax NPV            
i = 0%   $ 184,353,016      
i = 5%   $ 120,834,790      
i = 8%   $ 91,626,075      
i = 10%   $ 75,039,610      
i = 15%   $ 41,564,553      
IRR     24.5     %
             
Mine Life     6.6     years
Payback     3.3     years

 

Based on the methods and assumptions presented above, a summary of the economic analysis is presented in Table 22-2. The complete cash flow model is shown in Table 22-3.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 22-3

 

 

  AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 22-2
Economic Analysis Summary

 

Economic Analysis          
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pre-Tax     38.1 %    
Internal Rate of Return (IRR), After-Tax     24.5 %    
Average Annual Cashflow (Pre-Tax)   $ 60     M
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax)   $ 231     M
Average Annual Cashflow (After-Tax)   $ 43     M
NPV @ 5% (After-Tax)   $ 121     M
Gold Price Assumption   $ 1,250     /Ounce
Silver Price Assumption   $ 17     /Ounce
Pay-Back Period (Rears based on After-Tax)     3.3     Years
             
Capital Costs (Excluding VAT)            
Initial Capital   $ 125     M
Working Capital & Initial Fills   $ 14     M
LOM Sustaining Capital   $ 15     M
             
Operating Costs (Average LOM)            
Mining   $ 3.05     /Tonne processed
Processing & Support   $ 3.20     /Tonne processed
G&A   $ 1.77     /Tonne processed
Total Operating Cost   $ 8.02     /Tonne processed
Total By-product Cash Cost   $ 499     /Ounce Au
All-in Sustaining Cost   $ 555     /Ounce Au
             
Production Data            
Life of Mine     6.6     Years
Total Tonnes to Crusher     42,477,000     Tonnes
Grade Au (Avg.)     0.71     g/t
Grade Ag (Avg.)     13.56     g/t
Contained Au oz     966,000     Ounces
Contained Ag oz     18,517,000     Ounces
Mine Throughput per day     18,000     Tonnes/day
Mine Throughput per year     6,570,000     Tonnes/year
Metallurgical Recovery Au (Overall)     67 %    
Metallurgical Recovery Ag (Overall)     15 %    
Average Annual Gold Production     97,472     Ounces
Average Annual Silver Production     415,981     Ounces
Total Gold Produced     642,382     Ounces
Total Silver Produced     2,741,485     Ounces
LOM Strip Ratio     0.58:1      

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018

 

Page 22-4

 

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 22-3
Cash Flow Model

 

Assumptions             Output                
Au Price       1,250 $/oz     Pre-Tax NPV i, % After-Tax NPV          
Ag Price       17 $/oz     $324,052,617 0% $184,353,016   Mine Life 6.6 years  
Au Recovery, Kp Oxide       70.0 %     $230,634,552 5% $120,834,790   Payback 3.3 years  
Ag Recovery, Kp Oxide       13.00 %     $187,405,919 8% $91,626,075          
Au Recovery, Ki Oxide       58.00 %     $162,750,704 10% $75,039,610          
Ag Recovery, Ki Oxide       20.00 %     $112,663,113 15% $41,564,553          
Au Recovery, Transition Hi       60.00 %     38.1% IRR 24.5%          
Ag Recovery, Transition Hi       17.00 %                    
Au Recovery, Transition Lo       49.00 %                    
Ag Recovery, Transition Lo       20.00 %   Total Au Recovered   642,382 Ounces Stripping Ratio   0.58 t/t  
              Payable Ounces   641,900 Ounces          
Treatment Rate       18,000 tpd                    
              Max Annual Au oz   120,974            
Exchange Rate:             By-Product Cash Cost $499            
              All-in Sustaining Cost per ounce, $ $555   LOM Tonnes   42,477,000    
Refining and Transport Cost Au       1.40 $/oz - Assumed                    
Refining and Transport Cost Ag       1.20 $/oz - Assumed                    
Gold Pay Factor       99.9% Assumed                    
Silver Pay Factor       98.0% Assumed                    
Royalties       2.00%                      
Extraordinary Mining Duty       0.50%                      
Export Tax       0.00%                      
Income Tax Rate       30.0%                      
Special Mining Tax Rate       7.5%                      
                               
Salvage Value Percentage (Process Eq.)       10.0% Assumed                    
Salvage Value Percentage (Electrical Eq.)       5.0% Assumed                    

 

                               
          Year 1              
Item   TOTAL Year -2 Year -1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8
Total Mined                              
Leachable Tonnes   42,477,000   155,000 682,000 1,679,000 1,715,000 1,775,000 7,319,000 8,110,000 7,937,000 7,515,000 5,590,000    
     Au, g/t   0.71   0.83 0.83 0.59 0.58 0.58 0.62 0.67 0.74 0.77 0.83    
     Ag, g/t   13.56   9.58 9.57 9.77 9.77 10.00 10.61 11.80 14.07 15.47 20.70    
Waste Mined   24,537,000   345,000 1,518,000 1,602,000 1,603,000 1,549,000 5,804,000 4,844,000 3,217,000 2,580,000 1,475,000 0  
Total mined   67,014,000   500,000 2,200,000 3,281,000 3,318,000 3,324,000 13,123,000 12,954,000 11,154,000 10,095,000 7,065,000    
Strip Ratio   0.58     2.23 0.95 0.93 0.87 0.79 0.60 0.41 0.34 0.26    
Material Processed                              
Kp Oxide   28,561,000     609,000 1,098,000 1,112,000 1,202,000 5,341,000 5,958,000 5,902,000 4,739,000 1,367,000 1,233,000  
Ki Oxide   7,524,000     212,000 544,000 530,000 441,000 1,229,000 612,000 652,000 348,000 319,000 2,637,000  
Transition Hi   3,445,000     0 0 0 0 0 0 9,000 837,000 2,599,000 0  
Transition Lo   2,947,000     0 0 0 0 0 0 7,000 646,000 2,285,000 9,000  
Total   42,477,000   0 821,000 1,642,000 1,642,000 1,643,000 6,570,000 6,570,000 6,570,000 6,570,000 6,570,000 3,879,000  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 22-5

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Au, g/t - Kp Oxide   0.79     0.97 0.71 0.70 0.70 0.73 0.80 0.87 0.90 0.87 0.24  
Ag, g/t - Kp Oxide   13.82     10.59 11.00 11.01 11.12 11.70 13.08 15.83 16.54 17.57 11.65  
Au, g/t - Ki Oxide   0.37     0.49 0.37 0.38 0.37 0.38 0.48 0.52 0.54 0.28 0.27  
Ag, g/t - Ki Oxide   7.42     6.91 7.47 7.52 7.79 7.95 7.73 8.23 6.53 7.04 7.01  
Au, g/t - Transition Hi   0.77     0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.72 0.78 0.00  
Ag, g/t - transition Hi   22.10     0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.59 18.69 23.23 0.00  
Au, g/t - Transition Lo   0.72     0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.77 0.71 0.34  
Ag, g/t - Transition Lo   16.70     0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.96 17.67 16.52 4.07  
contained Au, oz   965,524     22,261 31,394 31,611 32,154 140,278 162,327 176,896 177,612 158,743 32,248  
contained Ag, oz   18,516,737     254,452 518,975 521,773 540,193 2,323,257 2,657,666 3,180,904 3,463,134 3,999,111 1,057,271  
                             
Recoverable Gold, kg 19,980     472 659 664 681 2,998 3,499 3,809 3,681 2,901 617  
Total Recoverable Gold, koz 642.4     15.2 21.2 21.4 21.9 96.4 112.5 122.5 118.3 93.3 19.8  
Ultimate Recovery, Au   67%     68% 68% 68% 68% 69% 69% 69% 67% 59% 61%  
                             
Recoverable Silver, kg 85,268     1,131 2,383 2,389 2,425 10,078 11,077 13,244 15,587 21,384 5,571  
Total Recoverable Silver, koz 2,741.5     36.4 76.6 76.8 78.0 324.0 356.1 425.8 501.1 687.5 179.1  
Ultimate Recovery, Ag   15%     14% 15% 15% 14% 14% 13% 13% 14% 17% 17%  
                             
Recoverable Gold Delayed, oz       7,591 10,598 10,677 10,941 14,457 16,874 18,371 17,750 13,988    
Recoverable Silver Delayed, oz         18,188 38,306 38,400 38,978 48,602 53,422 63,870 75,170 103,130    
                               
Total Gold Produced, oz 642,382     7,591 17,277 20,914 21,609 94,148 110,077 120,974 118,956 97,018 33,819  
Total Silver Produced, oz 2,741,485     18,188 54,312 74,292 77,367 318,997 351,324 415,353 489,831 659,570 282,250  
Realized Recovery, Au         34% 46% 54% 57% 63% 65% 66% 66% 65% 67%  
Realized Recovery, Ag         7% 9% 11% 12% 13% 13% 13% 13% 14% 15%  
                               
TOTAL EQUIVALENT Au oz PRODUCED 679,666     7,838 18,016 21,924 22,661 98,486 114,855 126,623 125,618 105,988 37,658  
                             
Gold payable, oz 641,900     7,585 17,264 20,898 21,592 94,077 109,994 120,883 118,867 96,945 33,794  
silver payable, oz 2,686,655     17,824 53,225 72,806 75,820 312,617 344,298 407,046 480,034 646,379 276,605  
equivalent Au payable oz 678,438     7,827 17,988 21,889 22,623 98,329 114,677 126,419 125,395 105,736 37,555  
                               
                                        Refining & Transportation Charge 4,122,646     $32,008 $88,040 $116,625 $121,213 $506,849 $567,149 $657,692 $742,455 $911,378 $379,237  
NET REVENUE   $843,925,338 $0.00   $9,752,101.67 $22,397,265 $27,244,059 $28,158,109 $122,404,211 $142,778,555 $157,366,011 $156,001,882 $131,258,007 $46,565,137 $0

 

          Year 1              
OPERATING COSTS   Total Year -2 Year -1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8
Operating Costs                              
Mining Cost $3.05 $129,568,894     $4,311,208 $5,390,891 $5,430,119 $5,503,908 $22,204,173 $22,703,758 $21,516,965 $21,633,957 $17,037,873 $3,836,043 $0
Processing Cost $3.20 $135,958,641     $3,068,821 $4,981,686 $4,981,686 $4,984,016 $19,931,405 $19,931,405 $19,931,405 $19,931,405 $19,931,405 $13,661,586 $4,623,822
G&A Cost $1.77 $75,389,241     $2,771,663 $2,771,663 $2,771,663 $2,771,663 $11,086,653 $11,086,653 $11,086,653 $11,086,653 $11,086,653 $5,543,327 $3,325,996
TOTAL OPERATING COSTS   $340,916,776 $0.00 $0.00 $10,151,692.05 $13,144,240.61 $13,183,468.46 $13,259,587.42 $53,222,231 $53,721,815 $52,535,023 $52,652,015 $48,055,931 $23,040,956 $7,949,817
                               
OPERATNG CASH FLOW   $503,008,561   $0 -$399,590 $9,253,024 $14,060,590 $14,898,522 $69,181,980 $89,056,740 $104,830,988 $103,349,867 $83,202,076 $23,524,182 -$7,949,817

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 22-6

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

          Year 1              
TAXES   Total Year -2 Year -1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8
Taxes                              
Mining Permit (Land Tax)   $0                          
Special Mining Tax   $35,580,704 $0 $0 $0 $660,381 $1,013,678 $1,075,152 $4,600,180 $6,305,799 $7,466,986 $7,357,948 $5,883,980 $1,216,600 $0
Income Tax Payable   $104,118,897 $0 $0 $0 $2,641,524 $4,054,713 $0 $10,474,470 $19,945,530 $24,590,279 $24,154,128 $18,258,254 $0 $0
TOTAL TAXES   $139,699,601 $0 $0 $0 $3,301,905 $5,068,391 $1,075,152 $15,074,650 $26,251,328 $32,057,266 $31,512,076 $24,142,234 $1,216,600 $0
                               
CASH FLOW BEFORE CAPITAL   $363,308,960   $0 -$399,590 $5,951,120 $8,992,199 $13,823,370 $54,107,330 $62,805,412 $72,773,723 $71,837,791 $59,059,843 $22,307,582 -$7,949,817
                               
          Year 1              
CAPITAL COSTS   Total Year -2 Year -1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8
Capital Costs                              
Contractor Mobilization   $2,148,045   $1,350,869 $532,488 $191,544 $73,144 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0  
Contractor Demobilization   $1,342,528   $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,342,528  
Owner Equipment   $1,110,595   $675,435 $266,244 $95,772 $36,572 $0 $0 $36,572 $0 $0 $0 $0  
Pre-Production Stripping   $2,899,752   $2,899,752 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0  
Mine Contingency   $0                          
Mine Subtotal   $7,500,920   $4,926,056 $798,732 $287,316 $109,716 $0 $0 $36,572 $0 $0 $0 $1,342,528 $0
                               
                               
Major Earthworks   $13,569,558   $8,171,392         $5,398,166            
Liner (Supply & Install)   $5,761,773   $3,538,777         $2,222,996            
Civils (Supply & Install)   $1,462,400   $1,462,400                      
Structural Steel (Supply & Install)   $1,457,746   $1,457,746                      
Platework (Supply)   $453,997   $453,997                      
Platework (Install)   $211,923   $211,923                      
Mechanical Equipment (Supply)   $28,275,350   $26,062,058         $2,213,292            
Mechanical Equipment (Install)   $2,843,706   $2,688,761         $154,945            
Piping (Supply & Install)   $3,611,253   $3,290,099         $321,153            
Electrical (Supply)   $10,986,874   $10,986,874                      
Electrical (Install)   $1,045,507   $1,045,507                      
Instrumentation (Supply & Install)   $1,011,926   $1,011,926                      
Infrastructure (Supply & Install)   $9,412,227   $9,412,227                      
Spare Parts   $1,081,040   $1,081,040                      
Freight & Duties   incl                          
                               
Process Contingency   $21,486,144   $19,500,565         $1,985,579            
EPCM   $9,941,282   $9,941,282                      
Indirect Costs (incl. contingency)   $10,845,035   $10,845,035                      
Owner's Costs (incl. contingency)   $9,037,529   $9,037,529                      
                               
Subtotal   $139,996,190 $0 $125,125,194 $798,732 $287,316 $109,716 $0 $12,296,131 $36,572 $0 $0 $0 $1,342,528 $0
Working Capital (Initial Fills)   $786,754   $786,754                      
Working Capital (90 days)   $13,001,982   $13,001,982                      
Process Preproduction   $0                          
Less: Working Capital Recovery   $13,788,736                     $4,596,245 $9,192,491  
Net Working Capital   $0   $13,788,736 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$4,596,245 -$9,192,491  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 22-7

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

                               
Subtotal   $139,996,190 $0 $138,913,930 $798,732 $287,316 $109,716 $0 $12,296,131 $36,572 $0 $0 -$4,596,245 -$7,849,963 $0
IVA 16% $22,208,068   $20,020,031         $1,967,381 $5,852 $0 $0 $0 $214,805 $0
Less: IVA (Rebate)   $22,208,068           $20,020,031 $0 $1,967,381 $5,852 $0 $0 $0 $214,805
Net IVA   $0   $20,020,031       -$20,020,031 $1,967,381 -$1,961,529 -$5,852 $0 $0 $214,805 -$214,805
                               
Subtotal   $139,996,190 $0 $158,933,961 $798,732 $287,316 $109,716 -$20,020,031 $14,263,512 -$1,924,957 -$5,852 $0 -$4,596,245 -$7,635,158 -$214,805
                               
Reclamation & Closure (Assumed US$ 0.50/t) $21,238,500               $2,123,850 $2,123,850 $2,123,850 $2,123,850 $6,371,550 $6,371,550
                               
Less: Salvage Value   $3,376,879                         $3,376,879
                               
TOTAL CAPITAL   $157,857,811 $0 $158,933,961 $798,732 $287,316 $109,716 ($20,020,031) $14,263,512 $198,893 $2,117,998 $2,123,850 ($2,472,395) ($1,263,608) $2,779,867

 

          Year 1              
PRE-TAX NET CASH FLOW   Total Year -2 Year -1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8
Pre-Tax Net Cash Flow                              
Pre-tax net cash flow   $345,150,751 $0 -$158,933,961 -$1,198,322 $8,965,708 $13,950,874 $34,918,553 $54,918,468 $88,857,847 $102,712,990 $101,226,017 $85,674,472 $24,787,789 -$10,729,684
Royalty Payable 2.00% $16,878,507 $0 $0 $195,042 $447,945 $544,881 $563,162 $2,448,084 $2,855,571 $3,147,320 $3,120,038 $2,625,160 $931,303 $0
Extraordinary Mining Duty 0.50% $4,219,627   $0 $48,761 $111,986 $136,220 $140,791 $612,021 $713,893 $786,830 $780,009 $656,290 $232,826 $0
Pre-tax net cash flow   $324,052,617 $0 -$158,933,961 -$1,442,125 $8,405,777 $13,269,773 $34,214,600 $51,858,362 $85,288,384 $98,778,839 $97,325,970 $82,393,021 $23,623,661 -$10,729,684
Cumulative     $0 -$158,933,961 -$160,376,086 -$151,970,310 -$138,700,537 -$104,485,937 -$52,627,574 $32,660,809 $131,439,649 $228,765,619 $311,158,640 $334,782,301 $324,052,617

 

          Year 1              
AFTER-TAX NET CASH FLOW     Year -2 Year -2 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8
After-Tax Net Cash Flow                              
       Income & Other Taxes   $139,699,601 $0 $0 $0 $3,301,905 $5,068,391 $1,075,152 $15,074,650 $26,251,328 $32,057,266 $31,512,076 $24,142,234 $1,216,600 $0
After-Tax net annual Cash Flow, $                    $184,353,016 $0 -$158,933,961 -$1,442,125 $5,103,872 $8,201,382 $33,139,448 $36,783,713 $59,037,055 $66,721,574 $65,813,894 $58,250,788 $22,407,061 -$10,729,684
Cumulative     $0 -$158,933,961 -$160,376,086 -$155,272,214 -$147,070,832 -$113,931,384 -$77,147,672 -$18,110,617 $48,610,957 $114,424,851 $172,675,639 $195,082,700 $184,353,016
                               
        -1       1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
        0       13,823,370 54,107,330 62,805,412 72,773,723 71,837,791 59,059,843 22,307,582 (7,949,817)

 

          Year 1              
CALCULATION FOR INCOME TAX     Year -2 Year -1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8
Calculation for Income Tax                              
Depreciation -Straight Line                              
Depreciation Year 1   $113,869,262     $16,327,903 $16,256,893 $16,256,893 $16,256,893 $16,256,893 $16,256,893 $16,256,893  
Depreciation Year 2   $0                    
Depreciation Year 3   $6,676,636         $1,335,327 $1,335,327 $1,335,327 $1,335,327 $1,335,327  
Depreciation Year 4   $0                    
Depreciation Year 5   $0                    
Depreciation Year 6   $0                    
Depreciation Year 7   $0                    
Depreciation Year 8   $0                    
Depreciation Year 9   $0                    
Depreciation Year 10   $0                    
                               
Total Depreciation for Income Tax   $120,545,898 $0 $0 $16,327,903 $16,256,893 $17,592,220 $17,592,220 $17,592,220 $17,592,220 $17,592,220 $0

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 22-8

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

                         
Revenue   $843,925,338 $0 $0 $9,752,102 $22,397,265 $27,244,059 $28,158,109 $122,404,211 $142,778,555 $157,366,011 $156,001,882 $131,258,007 $46,565,137 $0
(-) Royalties   $16,878,507 $0 $0 $195,042 $447,945 $544,881 $563,162 $2,448,084 $2,855,571 $3,147,320 $3,120,038 $2,625,160 $931,303 $0
(-) Operating Costs   $340,916,776 $0 $0 $10,151,692 $13,144,241 $13,183,468 $13,259,587 $53,222,231 $53,721,815 $52,535,023 $52,652,015 $48,055,931 $23,040,956 $7,949,817
(-)Reclamation   $21,238,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,123,850 $2,123,850 $2,123,850 $2,123,850 $6,371,550 $6,371,550
EBIDTA   $464,891,555 $0 $0 -$594,632 $8,805,079 $13,515,709 $14,335,359 $66,733,896 $84,077,319 $99,559,818 $98,105,979 $78,453,066 $16,221,329 -$14,321,367
                               
(-) Depreciation   $120,545,898           $16,327,903 $16,256,893 $17,592,220 $17,592,220 $17,592,220 $17,592,220 $17,592,220 $0
(-) Deductible Earthworks   $13,569,558 $0 $8,171,392 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,398,166 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
(-) Exploration deductions   $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Loss Brought Forward   -$82,475,256                   $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($8,171,392) ($10,163,936) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($1,370,892)
Taxable Income   $248,300,843 $0 ($8,171,392) ($594,632) $8,805,079 $13,515,709 ($10,163,936) $34,914,901 $66,485,098 $81,967,598 $80,513,759 $60,860,846 ($1,370,892) ($15,692,259)
                               
Income Taxes 30.0% $104,118,897 $0 $0 $0 $2,641,524 $4,054,713 $0 $10,474,470 $19,945,530 $24,590,279 $24,154,128 $18,258,254 $0 $0
                               
Loss Carry Forward     $0 ($8,171,392) ($594,632) $0 $0 ($10,163,936) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($1,370,892) ($15,692,259)
                               
EBIDTA   $464,891,555 $0 $0 ($594,632) $8,805,079 $13,515,709 $14,335,359 $66,733,896 $84,077,319 $99,559,818 $98,105,979 $78,453,066 $16,221,329 ($14,321,367)
(-) exploration   $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
(-) deductible earthworks   $13,569,558 $0 $8,171,392 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,398,166 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Income Subject to Special Mining Tax $451,321,996 $0 ($8,171,392) ($594,632) $8,805,079 $13,515,709 $14,335,359 $61,335,730 $84,077,319 $99,559,818 $98,105,979 $78,453,066 $16,221,329 ($14,321,367)
                               
Special Mining Tax 7.5% $35,580,704 $0 $0 $0 $660,381 $1,013,678 $1,075,152 $4,600,180 $6,305,799 $7,466,986 $7,357,948 $5,883,980 $1,216,600 $0

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 22-9

 

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The Camino Rojo cash flows are net of royalties and taxes. The project yields an after-tax return of 24.5%.

 

22.2 Sensitivity

 

To estimate the relative strength of the project, base case sensitivity analyses have been completed analyzing the economic sensitivity to several parameters including changes in gold price, capital costs and average operating cash cost per tonne of material processed. The sensitivities are based on +/- 25% of the base case. The after-tax analysis is presented in Table 22-4. Figure 22-1 through 22-3 present graphical representations of the after-tax sensitivities. From these sensitivities it can be seen that the project is robust.

 

The economic indicators chosen for sensitivity evaluation are the internal rate of return (IRR) and NPV at 0% and 5% discount rates.

 

Table 22-4
Sensitivity Analysis Results

 

                NPV  
    Variation     IRR     0%     5%     10%  
Gold Price                                        
75%   $ 938       8.9 %   $ 58,516,467     $ 21,406,028     $ -4,959,165
90%   $ 1,125       18.6 %   $ 134,018,397     $ 81,065,797     $ 43,044,271  
100%   $ 1,250       24.5 %   $ 184,353,016     $ 120,834,790     $ 75,039,610  
110%   $ 1,375       29.9 %   $ 233,731,543     $ 159,927,785     $ 106,543,772  
125%   $ 1,563       37.5 %   $ 306,847,950     $ 217,846,352     $ 153,235,796  
                                         
Capital Costs                                        
75%   $ 126,305,947       33.4 %   $ 206,009,548     $ 143,923,225     $ 98,818,340  
90%   $ 145,237,065       27.6 %   $ 193,262,389     $ 130,237,181     $ 84,666,217  
100%   $ 157,857,811       24.5 %   $ 184,353,016     $ 120,834,790     $ 75,039,610  
110%   $ 170,478,556       21.8 %   $ 175,244,883     $ 111,297,870     $ 65,320,279  
125%   $ 189,409,674       18.3 %   $ 161,582,683     $ 96,992,490     $ 50,741,283  
                                         
Operating Costs                                        
75%   $ 255,687,582       30.6 %   $ 239,000,813     $ 164,121,828     $ 110,010,823  
90%   $ 306,825,099       27.0 %   $ 206,592,687     $ 138,437,976     $ 89,253,783  
100%   $ 340,916,776       24.5 %   $ 184,353,016     $ 120,834,790     $ 75,039,610  
110%   $ 375,008,454       21.9 %   $ 161,675,682     $ 102,899,076     $ 60,564,501  
125%   $ 426,145,971       17.8 %   $ 127,659,682     $ 75,995,504     $ 38,851,838  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 22-10

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 22-1
After Tax Sensitivity – IRR

 

 

Figure 22-2
After Tax Sensitivity – NPV @ 0%

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 22-11

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 22-3
After Tax Sensitivity – NPV @ 5%

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 22-12

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

23.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES

 

There are no active exploration properties or producing mines immediately adjacent to the Camino Rojo project.

 

The Adjacent Owner controls a mining concession adjacent to the Camino Rojo concessions that abuts the northern limit of the Represa Zone. Drillpads and drillroads were observed on this claim during Dr. Gray’s site visit, but the drilling results were unavailable to the author. The Adjacent Owner, however, has a publicly available resource with respect to the adjacent mining concessions. Notwithstanding the absence of confirmed information, on this basis, it is concluded that the Represa mineralized zone extends onto the Adjance Owner’s claim, however, all interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report relate exclusively to the mining concessions that comprise the Camino Rojo Project.

 

The nearest significant producing mines or past producers are Goldcorp’s Peñasquito mine, located 53 km N-NW of Camino Rojo, and various mines of the Concepcion del Oro district, 47 km N-NE of Camino Rojo. The Peñasquito mine exploits gold-silver-lead-zinc mineralization hosted in igneous diatreme-breccia and the surrounding Caracol Formation. Peñasquito mineralization gives way at depth to copper-gold sulphide breccias in garnet skarn, within limestone beneath the Caracol Formation (Rocha-Rocha, 2016). Concepcion del Oro mines produced from polymetallic and copper-gold skarn deposits and limestone-hosted manto (replacement) silver-lead-zinc sulphide deposits adjacent to Late Eocene igneous intrusions (Buseck, 1966). Dr. Gray has not verified this information and the mineralization described for the mines and mineral deposits in this section is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization at the Camino Rojo, Zacatecas property.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 23-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

24.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION

 

24.1 Project Implementation

 

As part of the continued development and implementation of the Camino Rojo project, a prefeasibility or feasibility level study is to be completed, including additional metallurgical, geotechnical and hydrogeological studies. If the results of these future studies are positive, the project would move to detailed engineering and construction. Assuming these additional evaluations commence soon after the completion of this study and there are no significant issues or set-backs, it is envisioned for the project to go into production during the first quarter of 2021. A proposed project development and implementation schedule is presented in Figure 24-1.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 24-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

 

Figure 24-1
Project Development & Implementation Schedule

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 24-2

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

24.2 Sulphides

 

Results from historical exploration and metallurgical test work indicate that there is a potential sulphide resource that is not directly recoverable using conventional heap leaching methods but may be viable using different process techniques.

 

A possible process flowsheet for the sulphide resource is a sequential flotation process consisting of an initial pre-flotation to remove organic carbon followed by lead flotation, zinc flotation, and pyrite/arsenopyrite flotation to recover additional precious metals. The pyrite/arsenopyrite concentrate would be oxidized to recover additional gold and silver by cyanide leaching. Payable products would be the lead concentrate, zinc concentrate, and gold/silver doré recovered from the cyanide leaching of the pyrite/arsenopyrite concentrate.

 

Process operating costs for the sulphide resource were estimated by benchmarking data from Goldcorp’s Peñasquito operation. A NI-43-101 Technical Report dated March 2016 for Peñasquito estimated operating cost for the process plant, including a pyrite leach, to be US$7.37 per tonne milled. This estimate was based on a daily processing rate of 124,000 tonnes. With the potential sulphide resource at Camino Rojo of approximately 230,000,000 tonnes, the processing rate for a 10-year mine life at Camino Rojo would be approximately 60,000 tpd. To factor the US$7.37 per tonne operating costs to a smaller operation with a 0.6 exponential factor operating costs for Camino Rojo would be US$11.40 per tonne. For initial estimation purposes it is suggested to use US$12.50 per tonne for the process costs which do not include G&A and mining costs.

 

24.3 Other Cases

 

If an agreement can be achieved with the owner of the adjoining claim, there would be an increase in the amount of material that could potentially be mined and processed with the same general mine and process plan as the PEA is based upon. This would be positive for the project economics.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 24-3

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

25.0 INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

 

Based upon the studies of the Camino Rojo project, the following conclusions, opportunities, and risks have been identified that merit further consideration during future studies and project development:

 

25.1 Conclusions

 

The work that has been completed to date has demonstrated that Camino Rojo is a potentially technically and economically viable project and justifies additional work, including prefeasibility or feasibility analysis. More specific and detailed conclusions are presented in the sections below.

 

25.1.1 Mining

 

The Camino Rojo mine was modeled as a conventional open pit mine. The mine plan developed as the base case for this study has identified 42.5 million tonnes of potential plant feed at an average grade of 0.71 g/t gold and 13.6 g/t silver. This amounts to 966,000 contained ounces of gold and 18.5 million contained ounces of silver. The mine life is about 6.6 years and the life of mine strip ratio is 0.58 to 1, a relatively low ratio for a precious metal pit.

 

Pit operation should be relatively simple compared to most projects in Mexico. The ground in the deposit area is flat, and the haul distances to the proposed crusher and waste storage areas are only about 500m and a kilometer from the pit rim respectively.

 

The project is also close to a major road and only two to three hours from the major industrial cities of Saltillo and Monterrey, Mexico.

 

25.1.2 Metallurgy and Process

 

The project has been designed as an open-pit mine with heap leach for recovery of gold and silver from oxide and transition material. Leachable material will be crushed to P80 38mm, stockpiled, reclaimed and conveyor stacked onto the heap leach pad at an average rate of 18,000 tpd. Stacked material will be leached using low grade sodium cyanide solution and the resulting pregnant leach solution will be processed in a Merrill-Crowe plant for the recovery of gold and silver by zinc cementation.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 25-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Metallurgical test work completed on samples to date shows that the material is amenable to cyanide leaching for the recovery of precious metals with acceptable recoveries for gold and silver and low to moderate reagent consumptions. Cement agglomeration does not appear to be required based on compaction and permeability tests with only lime being required for pH control.

 

25.2 Opportunities

 

25.2.1 Mineral Resource

 

In addition to the leachable oxide resource, this study has identified a measured and indicated sulphide (mill) resource of 254.1 million tonnes at 0.89 g/t gold and 7.5 g/t silver. This amounts to 7.3 million contained ounces of gold and 61.3 million contained ounces of silver. Additional metallurgical studies will be required to evaluate potential recoveries for this material. This resource is contained on Orla property, but an agreement with the owner of the concession to the north of Orla’s property will be required to exploit this resource by open pit methods.

 

25.2.2 Mining

 

The base case mine plan for this study is constrained by Orla’s northern property boundary. If an agreement can be achieved with the owner of the adjoining claim and steepening of the north pit wall is allowable, there would be an increase in the amount of material that could potentially be mined and processed with the same general mine and process plan as the PEA is based upon. This would be positive for the project economics.

 

25.2.3 Metallurgy and Process

 

Test work to date indicates relatively minor effects on metal recovery vs. crush size, with gold being less sensitive to crush size than silver. Based on the results of future test work, it may be possible to achieve the same recoveries at even coarser crush sizes, which would result in reduced capital and operating costs for the project.

 

25.2.4 New Mineral Zones

 

The Camino Rojo deposit occurs within a mineralized district that is highly prospective for discovery of additional deposits.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 25-2

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

25.3 Risks

 

25.3.1 Mineral Resource

 

All of the mineralization comprised in the mineral resource estimate with respect to the Camino Rojo Project is contained on mineral titles controlled by Orla. However, the mineral resource estimate assumes that the north wall of the conceptual floating pit cone used to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction extends onto lands where mineral title is held by an Adjacent Owner and that waste would be mined on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Any potential development of the Camino Rojo Project that includes an open pit encompassing the entire mineral resource estimate would be dependent on obtaining an agreement with the Adjacent Owner. It is estimated that approximately two-thirds of the mineral resource estimate is dependent on an agreement being obtained with the Adjacent Owner. Delays in, or failure to obtain, such agreement would affect the development of a significant portion of the mineral resources of the Camino Rojo Project that are not included in the PEA, in particular by limiting access to significant mineralized material at depth. Orla intends to seek an agreement with the Adjacent Owner in order to maximize the potential to develop a mine that exploits the full mineral resource. There can be no assurance that Orla will be able to negotiate such agreement on terms that are satisfactory to Orla or that there will not be delays in obtaining the necessary agreement.

 

25.3.2 Mining

 

The Camino Rojo project considers contract mining as part of the base case study. There are some specific risks related to contract mining. There is risk that the contractor may need financial assistance from the owner either in terms of cash, or loan guarantees, to procure some equipment, increasing the capital cost.

 

Mining operations will eventually be conducted below the water table. Additional studies need to be conducted to evaluate the amount of pit inflow and the potential to keep the water from entering the pit by lowering the water table with external wells.

 

There is geotechnical risk associated with the base case mine plan that is constrained by the property boundary. Mitigation of any slope failures of the north wall could prove difficult due to lack of access to the ground to the north.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 25-3

 

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The mine plan is constrained by the Adjacent Owner concession boundary on the north side of the pit. The PEA is based on only a portion of the total mineral resource estimate and was prepared on the assumption that no mining activities would occur on the Adjacent Owner’s mineral titles. Accordingly, delays in, or failure to obtain, an agreement with the Adjacent Owner to conduct mining operations on its mineral titles would have no impact on the timetable or cost of development of the potential mine modelled in the PEA.

 

25.3.3 Metallurgy and Process

 

Significant historical metallurgical test work has been completed on material for Camino Rojo and indicate decent recoveries and relatively low reagent consumption; however, there is very little direct test work on coarse crushed material, which is considered for this report. Additionally, there is very little data available for Ki Oxide material with only two column leach tests being completed to date. Due to the lack of confirmatory test work on material as considered, recoveries and reagent consumptions are somewhat speculative, based on KCA’s expertise and experience, and could possibly be over stated. Confirmatory test work on material should be included in future studies to confirm the values considered in this study.

 

Test work on the Camino Rojo material has also identified carbonaceous material with preg-robbing characteristics. Inclusion of preg-robbing material on the heap may reduce the overall heap performance and overall metal recovery. During mining, efforts should be taken to identify and remove pre-robbing material before being delivered to the process.

 

25.3.4 Other Risks

 

The project considers running a 70 km power line to the project site in order to meet the site power requirements. At this stage of study, the federal electricity commission (Comisión Federal de Electricidad, CFE) has been consulted, but there have not been any formal response or proposal from CFE with regards to the construction and schedule for the proposed power line and only a budgetary allowance for constructing this power line has been considered. It is possible that there may be unforeseen challenges for constructing this power line which may result in higher than estimated costs or make the construction of this power line unfeasible. Investigations into the construction of a power line to the project site should be included as part of future studies.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 25-4

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

The project is subject to normal risks regarding access, title, permitting, and security. The project has had a productive relationship with the surface owners and no extraordinary risks to project access were discerned. Conditional upon continued compliance with annual requirements, no risk to validity of title was discerned. Conditional upon compliance with applicable regulations, permits for normal exploration activities, mine construction, and mine operation are expected to be attainable. Drug related violence, propagated by members of criminal cartels and directed against other members of criminal cartels, has occurred in the region and has affected local communities. The aggression is not directed at mining companies operating in the region and has not affected the ability of Orla or previous operators to explore the Camino Rojo project.

 

The chief non-technical project risk identified is that of a possible Federal designation of a protected biological-ecological reserve known as “Zacatecas Semiarid Desert” as a Natural Protected Area (ANP). If a designation of this ANP by the government includes the surface of the mining concession areas or ancillary work areas such as possible water well fields of Camino Rojo, this could limit the growth and continuity of the project. Mining activities (including both exploration and exploitation), depending on the corresponding sub-zone may be carried out provided they are authorized by CONANP (National Commission on Protected Natural Areas), without prejudice of other authorizations required for their execution. Goldcorp, the prior operator of the project, engaged in forums with government and community stakeholders, and submitted an official opinion regarding this ANP declaration to the government, with the objective of ensuring that if an ANP was created, the Camino Rojo project would not be restricted from development.  Since the time that the idea of creating an ANP was first proposed there has been no formal movement on the proposal. The State government has opposed the declaration of an ANP in the region.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 25-5

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

26.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

 

The PEA presents a potentially economically robust project. Based on these results, KCA recommends the following future work in regards to process and infrastructure development:

 

· The project should proceed to the prefeasibility or feasibility level;

 

· Additional studies and cost estimates for delivery of line power to the project site should be completed;

 

· Confirmatory metallurgical test work should be completed on representative samples for each metallurgical type, specifically column leach tests on coarse crushed material; and

 

· Perform geotechnical and hydrogeological studies at the proposed heap leach, pit and processing areas.

 

IMC recommends the following additional work for mining and resource development to advance the project to the PFS level:

 

· A limited infill drilling program to potentially convert the inferred mineral resource in the pit to indicated or measured mineral resource.

 

· Update the resource block model.

 

· Update the mine plan, and the mine capital and operating costs.

 

The limits of the sulphide resource described in Section 14.0 of this report have not been adequately determined, and higher grade portions of this sulphide resource are incompletely drill defined, thus there is potential to increase the tonnage and/or grade of the sulphide resource. RGI recommends an additional 5,000m of drilling to further evaluate the known sulphide resource, with the goal of defining mineralization that may be economically processed through a mill and flotation plant.

 

The Camino Rojo deposit occurs within a mineralized district that is highly prospective for discovery of additional deposits. Regional exploration, comprised of geophysical, geochemical, and geological surveys, is currently ongoing and is expected to identify other possible centers of mineralization, most of which will be masked by colluvial cover, thus evaluation of the project mineral concessions will require extensive drill testing.

 

In addition to the continuing the exploration work already underway, RGI recommends a 7,500m drill program to test satellite targets to the Camino Rojo deposit, with the goal of discovering one or more mineralized zones that may be of economic interest.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 26-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Additionally, the following investigations are recommended:

 

· Hydrological investigations need to be conducted to identify sources of water for the project and also to estimate pit dewatering requirements and costs.

 

· If the mine plan continues to be constrained by the north property boundary, some geotechnical drilling and investigations are recommended to evaluate the slope angle for this wall position and pit depth. The previous slope stability study, though detailed, evaluated a wall position about 200m north of the PEA mine plan and a significantly deeper pit.

 

· Environmental studies need to be conducted, including environmental baseline work and mine waste characterization. As of this writing, these studies are in progress.

 

· Ongoing work on permitting needs to continue.

 

The estimated costs for these recommendations as presented in this section are presented in Table 26-1.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 26-2

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Table 26-1
Recommendations

 

Description   Cost (US$)  
Resource Model     245,000  
Infill Drilling (1,000m @$200/m)     200,000  
Updated Model     45,000  
         
Mine Plan and Mining Costs     65,000  
         
Process and Infrastructure     1,070,000  
Metallurgical Drilling     250,000  
Metallurgical Testing     370,000  
PFS Level Studies     400,000  
Powerline Study     50,000  
         
Hydrological Studies     820,000  
Drilling     700,000  
PFS Level Studies     120,000  
         
Geotechnical Studies     475,000  
Geotechnical Drilling     110,000  
Slope Stability Study     100,000  
Foundation studies     165,000  
Sub-surface investigations     100,000  
         
Environmental Assessment     625,000  
Environmental Baseline Studies     400,000  
Waste Characterization     150,000  
Sampling costs     75,000  
         
Exploration     2,950,000  
Drilling (5,000m), sulphide zone extensions     1,000,000  
Regional Geophysics     250,000  
Regional Geochemistry     100,000  
Regional Geologic Mapping     100,000  
Regional Targets Drilling (7500m)     1,500,000  
         
         
Camp and Support (20%)     1,250,000  
         
TOTAL     7,500,000  

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 26-3

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

27.0 REFERENCES

 

Aranda-Gomez, J. L.-M.-C., 2006, El volcanismo tipo intraplaca del Cenozoico tardío en el centro y norte de México: Una revision. Boletín De La Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, 187-225.

 

Barboza-Gudiño, J. Z.-M.-R.-N., 2010, Late Triassic stratigraphy and facies from northeastern Mexico: Tectonic setting and provenance. Geosphere, 621-640.

 

Blanchflower, J. (2009, January 15). Technical Report on the Mineral Resources of the Camino Rojo Property. Technical report posted by the Canplats on SEDAR, January 15, 2009, 70 p: Minorex Consulting.

 

Blanchflower, K. K. (2009). Technical Report Preliminary Assessment based on Report Titled "Technical Assessment of Camino Rojo Project, Zacatecas, Mexico", prepared by Minorex Consulting Mine and Quarry Engineering Services Inc. for Canplats Resources Corporation, October 16, 2009.

 

Blue Coast Research, Ltd., 2013 (September), PJ5119 – Goldcorp Camino Rojo Represa Transition Sample Summary, Prepared for Goldcorp.

 

Buseck, P. R., 1966, Contact metamorphism and ore deposition, Concepcion del Oro, Mexico. Economic Geology, 61(1), p 97-136.

 

Centeno-Garcia, E., 2005, Review of Upper Paleozoic and Lower Mesozoic stratigraphy and depositional environments of central and west Mexico: Constraints on terrane analysis and paleogeography. The Mojave-Sonora megashear hypothesis: Development, assessment, and alternatives: Geological Society of America Special Paper 393,Anderson, T.H., Nourse, J.A., McKee, J.W., and Steiner, M.B., eds., 233-258.

 

CONANP., 2014, Estudio previo justificativo para la declaratoria como Area Natural Protegida Reserva de la Biosfera Desierto Semiarido de Zacatecas. Mexico City, Mexico: Comision Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 27-1

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Cruz-Gámez, E. V.-T.-F.-S.-D., 2017, Volcanic sequence in Late Triassic – Jurassic siliciclastic and evaporitic rocks from Galeana, NE Mexico. Geologica Acta: an international earth science journal, 89-106.

 

Ernst & Young, 2017, (May), Metals Tax Summary, Mexico - Mining and Metals Tax Guide.

 

Goldcorp, 2016 (September), Pre-Feasibility Study Report, Camino Rojo Project, San Tiburcio, Zacatecas, Mexico.

 

Goldcorp Inc., 2017, (March), Goldcorp Annual Information Form for the Financial Year Ending 31 December 2016.

 

Gray, M. D., 2016 (December), Site Visit Report, Camino Rojo Gold Project (Goldcorp), Zacatecas, Mexico, Prepared for Orla Mining Ltd. Rio Rico, Arizona, USA: Resource Geosciences Inc.

 

Gray, M. D, 2018, CSA NI43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project, Municipio of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico. Rio Rico, AZ: Resource Geosciences Inc.

 

Hawkins, D., 2018, Groundwater Conditions – Camino Rojo Project. Tucson, Arizona: Barranca Group LLC.

 

Hazen Research Inc., 2014, Camino Rojo Project Variability Study. Golden, Colorado: Hazen Research Inc.

 

Heiras, M., 2017 (June), Legal opinion letter. Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico: Heiras y Asociados S.C. Abogados.

 

Heiras, M., 2018 (January), Letter report, Camino Rojo permitting for exploration and Ejido relations. Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico: Heiras y Asociados S.C., Abogados.

 

Huss, C., M3, 2012 (August), Camino Rojo Project Technical Report Prefeasibility Study, Zacatecas, Mexico, Document No. M3-PN100113, Prepared for Goldcorp.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2010 (April), Camino Rojo Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work, Prepared for Mine and Quarry Engineering Services, Inc.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 27-2

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2012 (May), Camino Rojo Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work, Prepared for Goldcorp.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2014 (October), Camino Rojo Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work, Prepared for Goldcorp.

  

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2015 (August), Camino Rojo Project Report of Metallurgical Test Work, Prepared for Goldcorp.

 

Longo, A., 2017, Review of the exploration data for Camino Rojo, Orla Mining Ltd., private company report. Reno, NV.

 

Longo, A.A., Edwards, J., 2017, Camino Rojo: Observations leading to a new geologic model, and breccia modelling issues, private company report, Prepared for Orla Mining Ltd. Reno, NV.

 

Loza-Aguirre, I. N., 2008, Relaciones estratigráfico-estructurales en la intersección del sistema de fallas San Luis-Tepehuanes y el graben de Aguascalientes, México central, pp. 533-548.

 

Loza-Aguirre, I. N.-S.-Á.-O., 2012, Cenozoic volcanism and extension in northwestern Mesa Central, Durango, México. Boletín De La Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, 243-263.

 

Meinert, L.D., Dipple, G.M., and Nicolescu, S., 2005, World Skarn Deposits. In J. T. Hedenquist, Economic Geology One Hundredth Anniversary Volume 1905 - 2005. (p. 1136). Littleton, CO: Society of Economic Geologists, Inc.

 

Mitre-Salazar, L., 1989, La megafalla Laramídica de San Tiburcio, estado de Zacatecas. Univ. Nacional Autón. México, Inst. Geologia Revista, 47-51.

 

Nieto-Samaniego, A. A.-Á., 2007, Mesa Central of México: Stratigraphy, structure, and Cenozoic tectonic evolution. Geology of México: Celebrating the Centenary of the Geological Society of México: Geological Society of America, Special Paper 422, Álvarez, S.A., and Nieto-Samaniego, Á.F., eds., 41-70.

 

Ortega-Flores, B. S.-A., 2015, The Mesozoic successions of western Sierra de Zacatecas, Central Mexico: provenance and tectonic implications. Geology Magazine, 1-22.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 27-3

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., 2016 (May), Goldcorp Inc. Camino Rojo Project Prefeasibility Pit Slope Design Study, Geotechnical Investigations and Slope Design Recommendations for the Proposed Oxide and Sulphide Open Pits, Prepared for Goldcorp.

 

Rocha-Rocha, M., 2016 (May), Metallogenesis of the Peñasquito polymetallic deposit: A contribution to the understanding of the magmatic ore system. Doctoral dissertation. Reno, Nevada, USA: University of Nevada Reno.

 

Sanchez, S., 2017 (May), The Mineralogy, Paragenesis And Alteration Of The Camino Rojo Deposit, Zacatecas, Mexico. Master of Science Thesis. Reno, Nevada, USA: University of Nevada, Reno.

 

SEMARNAT, Delegacion en el Estado De Zacatecas, Subdelegacion de Gestion para la Proteccion Ambiental y Recursos Naturales., 2013, Oficio No DFZ152-203/13/1675. Zactecas, Zacatecas: Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Mexico.

 

Servicio Geologico Mexicano, 2000, Carta Geologico-Minero Concepcion del Oro G14-10. Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico: Servicio Geologico Mexicano.

 

Servicio Geologico Mexicano, 2014, Carta Geologico-Minero San Tiburcio G14C82. Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico: Servicio Geologico Mexicano.

 

SGS Minerals Services, 2009 (August), Progress Report 1, Evaluation of the Amenability of Camino Rojo Drill Hole Samples to Cyanide Leaching and Flotation Processes, Report SGS 54-08, Prepared for Canplats de México, S.A. de C.V.

 

SGS Minerals Services, 2009 (August), An Investigation into the Amenability of 21 Camino Rojo Samples to Leaching and Flotation Processes, Report SGS-09-09, Progress Report 2, Prepared for Canplats de México, S.A. de C.V.

 

Tristán-González, M. A.-D.-H.-H., 2009, Post-Laramide and pre-Basin and Range deformation and implications for Paleogene (55–25 Ma) volcanism in central Mexico: A geological basis for a volcano-tectonic stress model. Tectonophysics, 136-152.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 27-4

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

Weiss, S. I.-V.-D.-C.,2010, Geologic Setting and Polymetallic Style of Gold Mineralization, Camino Rojo Deposit, Northern Zacatecas, Mexico. Gold and Base Metal Deposits in the Mexican Altiplano, States of Zacatecas and San Luis Potosi, Central Mexico, Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook series, V. 40, 97-102.

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 27-5

 

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED
Camino Rojo Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report

 

28.0 DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE

 

This report, entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” has the following report dates:

 

Report Date is:   June 19, 2018

 

Amendment Date:   March 11, 2019

 

Mineral Resource Effective Date is:   April 27, 2018

 

The report was prepared and signed by the Qualified Persons as presented in the following certificates:

 

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

June 19, 2018 

 

Page 28-6

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

 

I, Carl E. Defilippi, RM SME # 775870, of Reno, Nevada, USA, Sr. Project Engineer, Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, as an author of this report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019, prepared for Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Issuer”) do hereby certify that:

 

1. I am employed as a Sr. Project Engineer at Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, an independent metallurgical consulting firm, whose address is 7950 Security Circle, Reno, Nevada 89506.

 

2. This certificate applies to the technical report “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019 (the “Technical Report”).

 

3. I am a registered member with the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (SME) since 2011 and my qualifications include experience applicable to the subject matter of the Technical Report. In particular, I am a graduate of the University of Nevada with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering (1978) and a M.S. in Metallurgical Engineering (1981). I have practiced my profession continuously since 1982. Most of my professional practice has focused on the development of gold-silver leaching projects. I have successfully managed numerous studies at all levels on various cyanidation projects.

 

4. I am familiar with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and by reason of education, experience and professional registration I fulfill the requirements of a “qualified person” as defined in NI 43-101.

 

5. I visited the Camino Rojo site on February 20 and 21, 2018 for a period of two days.

 

6. I am responsible for Sections 1.1, 1.5, 1.8, 1.9, 1.11, 1.12, 1.13, 1.14, 2, 3, 13, 17, 18, 19, all of 21 except 21.1.1 and 21.2.1, 22, and co-responsible for Sections 24 through 27 as they pertain to metallurgy, processing and infrastructure, of the Technical Report.

 

7. I am an independent qualified person as described in section 1.5 of NI 43-101, as I am not an employee of the Issuer.

 

 

 

 

8. I have had no prior involvement with the property.

 

9. I have read NI 43-101 and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

 

10. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Dated this 11th day of March, 2019

 

   
Signed “Carl E. Defilippi”  

Carl E. Defilippi RM SME # 775870

Sr. Project Engineer

Kappes, Cassiday & Associates

 

 

 

 

  

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

 

I, Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. #10688, of Rio Rico, Arizona, USA, Geologist at Resource Geosciences Incorporated, as an author of this report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019, prepared for Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Issuer”) do hereby certify that:

 

1. I am employed as a geologist at Resource Geosciences Incorporated, (RGI) an independent consulting geosciences firm, whose address is 765A Dorotea Ct, Rio Rico, Arizona, 85648 USA.

 

2. This certificate applies to the technical report “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019 (the “Technical Report”).

 

3. I am a Certified Professional Geologist (#10688) with the American Institute of Professional Geologists since 2003 and my qualifications include experience applicable to the subject matter of this Technical Report. In particular, I am a graduate of the Colorado School of Mines (Ph.D., Geology with Minor in Mineral Economics, 1994; B.Sc., Geological Engineering, 1985) and the University of Arizona (M.Sc., Geosciences, 1988) and I have practiced my profession continuously since 1988. Most of my professional practice has focused on exploration metallic mineral deposits, the creation of resource models, and the economic development of gold and copper deposits. I successfully managed mine permitting, water rights, and community relocation issues related to development of the Piedras Verdes copper mine, a large scale open pit mine in Sonora, Mexico.

 

4. I am familiar with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and by reason of education, experience and professional registration I fulfill the requirements of a “qualified person” as defined in NI 43-101.

 

5. I visited the Camino Rojo property on February 19 to 22, 2018.

 

6. I am responsible for Sections 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.10, 4 through 9, 20, and 23 of the Technical Report, and related summaries, conclusions, recommendations, and references as presented in Sections 24, 25, 26 and 27.

 

 

 

 

7. I am an independent of the Issuer as described in section 1.5 of NI 43-101.

 

8. I have had no prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report.

 

9. I have read NI 43-101 and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

 

10. As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Dated this 11th day of March, 2019

 

“Matthew D. Gray”  

Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G. #10688

Geologist at Resource Geosciences Incorporated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

 

I, Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM, as an author of this report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico”, dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019, prepared for Orla Mining Ltd. do hereby certify that:

 

1. I am currently employed as Vice President and Principal Mining Engineer by Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. (“IMC”) of 3560 East Gas Road, Tucson, Arizona, 85714, USA, phone number (520) 294-9861.

 

2. This certificate applies to the technical report “ Preliminary Economic Assessment – Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project – Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019 (the “Technical Report”).

 

3. I hold the following academic qualifications:

 

B.S. (Mining Engineering) University of Arizona 1979

M.S. (Mining Engineering) University of Arizona 1982

 

4. I am a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (FAusIMM #221108), a professional association as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). As well, I am a member in good standing of the following technical associations and societies:

 

Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. (SME Member # 1423200)

 

Member of Resources and Reserves Committee of the Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration.

 

The Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM Member #100809)

 

5. I have worked in the minerals industry as an engineer continuously since 1979, a period of 39 years. I am a founding partner, Vice President, and Principal Mining Engineer for Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. (“IMC”), a position I have held since 1983. I have been employed as an Adjunct Lecturer at the University of Arizona (1997-1998) where I taught classes in open pit mine planning and mine economic analysis. I am also a member of the Resources and Reserves Committee of the Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration since March 2012. I was employed as a staff engineer for Pincock, Allen & Holt, Inc. from 1979 to 1983. During my career I have had extensive experience reviewing and auditing deposit sampling methods, analytical procedures, and QA/QC analysis. I also have many years of experience developing mineral resource models, developing open pit mine plans and production schedules, calculating equipment requirements for open pit mining operations, developing mine capital and operating cost estimates, performing economic analysis of mining operations and managing various PEA, Pre-Feasibility, and Feasibility Studies.

 

 

 

 

6. I have read the definition of “Qualified Person” (“QP”) set out in NI 43-101 and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “Qualified Person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.

 

7. I am the responsible for Sections 1.6, 1.7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 21.1.1, 21.2.1, and co-responsible for Sections 24 through 27 as they pertain to mineral resources and mining, of Technical Report.

 

8. I have had no prior involvement with the property.

 

9. I visited the Camino Rojo site on February 20 and 21, 2018 for a period of two days.

 

10. As of the date of the this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the portions of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

11. I am independent of the issuer applying all of the tests in Section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101.

 

12. I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form.

 

Dated this 11th day of March, 2019

 

Signed “Michael G. Hester”  

Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.89

 

Consent of David Brown

 

I hereby consent to the quotation or summary of those portions prepared by me of the report entitled “Cerro Quema Project-Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014, and to the reference to my name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;
(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;
(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;
(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and Nine months ended September 30, 2019;
(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;
(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;
(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

  

  /s/ David Brown
  David Brown
   
  Dated: December 4, 2020

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.90

 

Consent of George Lightwood

 

I hereby consent to the quotation or summary of those portions prepared by me of the report entitled “Cerro Quema Project-Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014, and to the reference to my name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;
(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;
(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;
(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and Nine months ended September 30, 2019;
(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;
(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;
(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

  

  /s/ George Lightwood
  George Lightwood, PE
   
  Dated: December 4, 2020

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.91

 

Consent of Gene Tortelli

 

I hereby consent to the quotation or summary of those portions prepared by me of the report entitled “Cerro Quema Project-Pre-Feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014 with an effective date of June 30, 2014, and to the reference to my name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;
(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;
(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;
(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and Nine months ended September 30, 2019;
(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;
(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;
(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

  

  /s/ Gene Tortelli
  Gene Tortelli, PE
   
  Dated: December 4, 2020

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.92

 

Consent of Carl E. Defilippi

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019
(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019:
(c) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and Nine months ended September 30, 2019;
(e) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;
(f) News Release date August 7, 2019;
(g) NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico dated June 25, 2019;
(h) News Release date June 25, 2019;
(i) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;
(j) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(k) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(l) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;
(m) Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019.

 

  /s/ Carl E. Defilippi
  Carl E. Defilippi, RM, SME
   
  Dated: November 30, 2020

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.93

 

Consent of David B. Hawkins

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019
(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(c) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and Nine months ended September 30, 2019;
(e) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;
(f) News Release date August 7, 2019;
(g) NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico dated June 25, 2019;
(h) News Release date June 25, 2019.

 

  /s/ David B. Hawkins
  David B. Hawkins, C.P.G.
   
  Dated: November 30, 2020

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.94

 

Consent of Dr. Matthew D. Gray

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019
(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(c) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and Nine months ended September 30, 2019;
(e) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;
(f) News Release date August 7, 2019;
(g) NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico dated June 25, 2019;
(h) News Release date June 25, 2019;
(i) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;
(j) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(k) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(l) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;
(m) Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019.

  

  /s/ Matthew D. Gray
  Dr. Matthew D. Gray, Ph.D., C.P.G.
   
  Dated: November 30, 2020

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.95

 

Consent of Michael G. Hester

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019
(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(c) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and Nine months ended September 30, 2019;
(e) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;
(f) News Release date August 7, 2019;
(g) NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico dated June 25, 2019;
(h) News Release date June 25, 2019;
(i) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;
(j) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(k) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(l) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;
(m) Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico dated June 19, 2018 and amended March 11, 2019.

  

  /s/ Michael G. Hester
  Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM
   
  Dated: November 30, 2020

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.96

 

Consent of Hans Smit

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;
(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;
(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;
(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and Nine months ended September 30, 2019;
(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;
(h) News Release date December 18, 2019;
(i) News Release date September 9, 2019;
(j) News Release date August 7, 2019;
(k) News Release date June 25, 2019;
(l) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;
(m) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(n) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(o) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

  

  /s/ Hans Smit
  Hans Smit, P.Geo.
   
  Dated: November 30, 2020

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.97

 

 

201 County Court Blvd., Suite 304, Brampton, Ontario, L6W 4L2

Ph: 905-595-0575 Fax: 905-595-0578 www.peconsulting.ca

 

Consent of P&E Mining Consultants Inc.

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;

(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;

(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;

(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019:

(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;

(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019;

(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;

(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;

(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

 

/s/ Eugene Puritch   
P&E Mining Consultants Inc.  
Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., FEC, CET  
President  
   
Dated: November 30, 2020  

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.98

 

Consent of INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use in this Registration Statement on Form 40-F (the “Registration Statement”) of Orla Mining Ltd. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, of our reports dated March 18, 2019 and March 20, 2020, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company which are incorporated by reference into and a part of this Registration Statement.

 

The Undersigned also consents to the reference to their name relating to the following documents incorporated by reference into and a part of the Registration Statement:

 

(a) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019
(b) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(c) Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
(d) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(e) Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017;
(f) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

 

/s/ Davidson & Company LLP
Vancouver, Canada Charted Professional Accountants
Dated: December 3, 2020 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.99

 

 

 

201 County Court Blvd., Suite 304, Brampton, Ontario, L6W 4L2

Ph: 905-595-0575 Fax: 905-595-0578 www.peconsulting.ca

 

Consent of Eugene Puritch

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;

(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;

(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;

(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019:

(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;

(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019;

(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;

(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;

(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

 

/s/ Eugene Puritch  
Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., FEC, CET  
President  
   
Dated: November 30, 2020  

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.100

 

 

 

201 County Court Blvd., Suite 304, Brampton, Ontario, L6W 4L2

Ph: 905-595-0575 Fax: 905-595-0578 www.peconsulting.ca

 

Consent of Richard Sutcliffe

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;

(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;

(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;

(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019:

(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;

(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019;

(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;

(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;

(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

 

/s/ Richard Sutcliffe  
Richard Sutcliffe, PhD, P.Geo.  
Senior Geological Advisor  
   
Dated: November 30, 2020  

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.101

 

 

 

201 County Court Blvd., Suite 304, Brampton, Ontario, L6W 4L2

Ph: 905-595-0575 Fax: 905-595-0578 www.peconsulting.ca

 

Consent of Tracy Armstrong

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;

(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;

(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;

(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019:

(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;

(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019;

(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;

(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;

(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

 

/s/ Tracy Armstrong  
Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo.  
Associate Geologist  
   
Dated: November 30, 2020  

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.102

 

 

 

201 County Court Blvd., Suite 304, Brampton, Ontario, L6W 4L2

Ph: 905-595-0575 Fax: 905-595-0578 www.peconsulting.ca

 

Consent of Antoine Yassa

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;

(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;

(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;

(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019:

(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;

(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019;

(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;

(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;

(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

 

/s/ Antoine Yassa  
Antoine Yassa, P.Geo.  
Associate Geologist  
   
Dated: November 30, 2020  

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.103

 

 

 

201 County Court Blvd., Suite 304, Brampton, Ontario, L6W 4L2

Ph: 905-595-0575 Fax: 905-595-0578 www.peconsulting.ca

 

Consent of Kenneth Kuchling

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;

(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;

(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;

(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019:

(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;

(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019;

(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;

(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;

(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

 

/s/ Kenneth Kuchling  
Kenneth Kuchling, P.Eng.  
Associate Mine Engineer  
   
Dated: November 30, 2020  

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.104

 

 

 

201 County Court Blvd., Suite 304, Brampton, Ontario, L6W 4L2

Ph: 905-595-0575 Fax: 905-595-0578 www.peconsulting.ca

 

Consent of David Burga

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;

(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;

(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;

(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019:

(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;

(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019;

(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;

(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;

(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

 

/s/ David Burga  
David Burga, P.Geo.  
Associate Geologist  
 
Dated: November 30, 2020  

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.105

 

 

 

201 County Court Blvd., Suite 304, Brampton, Ontario, L6W 4L2

Ph: 905-595-0575 Fax: 905-595-0578 www.peconsulting.ca

 

Consent of Fred Brown

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;

(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;

(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;

(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019:

(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;

(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019;

(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;

(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;

(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;

(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

 

   
Fred Brown, P.Geo.  
Associate Geologist  
   
Dated: November 30, 2020  

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.106

 

Consent of Mark Gorman

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of their report(s), and the information derived therefrom, as well as the reference to their name, in each case where used or incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form 40-F of Orla Mining Ltd. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, related to the following:

 

(a) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020;
(b) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2020;
(c) Prospectus Supplement dated March 30, 2020 to the Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019;
(d) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019:
(e) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019;
(f) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and Nine months ended September 30, 2019;
(g) Management's discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019;
(h) Management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2019;
(i) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(j) Management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018;
(k) Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated March 11, 2019.

 

  /s/ Mark Gorman
  Mark Gorman, Professional Engineer (inactive)
   
  Dated: November 30, 2020

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.107

 

 

NEWS RELEASE    

 

ORLA MINING APPOINTS ERIC COLBY TO ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS THE NEWMONT NOMINEE

  

VANCOUVER, BC – December 4, 2020 - Orla Mining Ltd. (TSX: OLA) (“Orla” or the "Company") is pleased to announce the appointment of Eric Colby to its Board of Directors as nominated by Newmont Corporation (“Newmont”). The appointment is effective immediately.

 

Mr. Colby is currently Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications at Newmont, where he leads the company’s investor relations, internal communications, and media relations. Prior to this role, he served in the corporate development group since 2013 where he had an active role in a number of completed transactions including the acquisition of Goldcorp Inc. and the formation of the Nevada Joint Venture with Barrick Gold Corporation. Eric joined Newmont in 2007 and has held several roles in the corporate office and spent several years working at the Yanacocha operations in Peru. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Finance from the University of Denver.

 

Chuck Jeannes, Chairman of the Board of Orla, commented, “On behalf of the Board, I would like to welcome Eric to Orla. He brings significant global mining experience and has played a key role in important transactions in our industry in recent years. His addition reflects Newmont’s continued commitment to the advancement of Camino Rojo and to the growth of Orla. We look forward to Eric’s contribution as the Company transitions from development to gold production.”

 

In connection with Orla’s purchase of the Camino Rojo project from Goldcorp Inc.1 (now “Newmont”) on November 7, 2017, Newmont was granted the right to appoint one nominee to the board of directors of Orla for as long as it maintains a 10% interest or greater in the Company. Newmont currently holds 41.1 million common shares of the Company representing approximately 18.0%.

 

About Orla Mining Ltd.

 

Orla is developing the Camino Rojo Oxide Gold Project, an advanced gold and silver open-pit and heap leach project, located in Zacatecas State, Central Mexico. The project is 100% owned by Orla and covers over 160,000 hectares. The technical report entitled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Camino Rojo Gold Project — Municipality of Mazapil, Zacatecas, Mexico” dated June 25, 2019 is available on SEDAR under the Company’s profile as well as on Orla’s website at www.orlamining.com. Orla also owns 100% of the Cerro Quema Project located in Panama which includes a near-term gold production scenario and various exploration targets. The Cerro Quema Project is a proposed open pit mine and gold heap leach operation. Please refer to the “Cerro Quema Project - Pre-feasibility Study on the La Pava and Quemita Oxide Gold Deposits” dated August 15, 2014, which is available on SEDAR.

 

 

1 Goldcorp Inc. is a predecessor company to Newmont, prior to April 18, 2019. Newmont is a publicly traded company resulting from the combination of Newmont Mining Corporation and Goldcorp Inc., effective April 18, 2019.

 

1

 

 

NEWS RELEASE    

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

This news release contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including, without limitation, statements with respect to the use of funds, the timing of meeting certain conditions with respect to the Credit Facility, the timing of equipment delivery, the results of exploration and planned exploration programs, anticipated cost savings, the potential for discovery of additional mineral resources and the Company’s objectives and strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this news release, including without limitation, assumptions that all conditions of the Credit Facility will be met, the Company’s activities will be in accordance with the Company’s public statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required approvals will be obtained and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks related to uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies, drill results and the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources; and risks associated with executing the Company’s objectives and strategies, including costs and expenses, as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company's most recently filed management's discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 23, 2020, available on www.sedar.com. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

 

For further information, please contact:

 

Jason Simpson

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

Andrew Bradbury

Director, Investor Relations

 

www.orlamining.com
info@orlamining.com

 

2