Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. (Form: 424B3, Received: 09/08/2021 06:02:57)

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)

Registration No. 333-258338

PROSPECTUS

SUNLIGHT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC.

Up to 143,702,083 Shares of
Class A Common Stock

9,900,000 Warrants to Purchase
Class A Common Stock

This prospectus relates to the issuance by us of (i) up to an aggregate of 17,250,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Class A Common Stock”) that are issuable upon the exercise of our publicly-traded warrants (the “public warrants”), (ii) up to 9,900,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of private placement warrants issued to Spartan Acquisition Sponsor II LLC (the “private placement warrants” and, together with the public warrants, the “Sunlight Warrants”) at an exercise price of $11.50 per share, (iii) 1,712,711 shares of Class A Common Stock held, and expected to be held, by Sunlight in respect of net withholding for tax payments of certain recipients of Class A Common Stock as consideration in connection with the Business Combination (as defined below) and (iv) up to 627,780 shares of Class A Common Stock that are issuable upon the exercise of certain other warrants (the “Tech Capital Warrants”) at an exercise price of $7.715 per share.

This prospectus also relates to the sale from time to time of (A) 1,712,711 shares of Class A Common Stock held, and expected to be held, by Sunlight in respect of net withholding for tax payments of certain recipients of Class A Common Stock as consideration in connection with the Business Combination and sale by us, (B) upon the expiration of lock-up agreements, as applicable, up to 122,157,418 shares of our Class A Common Stock, including such shares subject to issuance upon redemption of our Class C Common Stock (and Class EX Units) on a one-for-one basis, by the selling stockholders named in this prospectus or their permitted transferees (the “Selling Stockholders”) and (C) up to 9,900,000 private placement warrants by the selling holders thereof (the “Selling Warrantholders,” together with the Selling Stockholders, the “Selling Securityholders”).

The Selling Securityholders may offer, sell or distribute all or a portion of the shares of Class A Common Stock and private placement warrants registered hereby publicly or through private transactions at prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices or as distributions in kind to their members, partners or stockholders pursuant to the Registration Statement of which this prospectus is a part by delivering a prospectus with a plan of distribution. We provide more information about how the Selling Securityholders may sell the securities in the section entitled “Plan of Distribution.”

We will pay certain offering fees and expenses and fees in connection with the registration of the Class A Common Stock and private placement warrants and will not receive proceeds from the sale of the shares of Class A Common Stock or private placement warrants by the Selling Securityholders. We will receive the proceeds from any exercise of any warrants for cash.

Our Class A Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SUNL” and our publicly-traded warrants are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SUNL WS”. On September 3, 2021, the closing price of our Class A Common Stock was $5.32 and the closing price of our publicly-traded warrants was $0.75.

We are an “emerging growth company” under applicable federal securities laws and will be subject to reduced public company reporting requirements.

INVESTING IN OUR SECURITIES INVOLVES RISKS THAT ARE DESCRIBED IN THE “RISK FACTORS” SECTION BEGINNING ON PAGE 16 OF THIS PROSPECTUS.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the securities to be issued under this prospectus or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is September 7, 2021.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

This prospectus is part of a Registration Statement on Form S-1 that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) using the “shelf” registration process. Under this shelf registration process, the Selling Securityholders may, from time to time, sell the securities offered by them described in this prospectus. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale by such Selling Securityholders of the securities offered by them described in this prospectus.

Neither we nor the Selling Securityholders have authorized anyone to provide you with any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus or any applicable prospectus supplement or any free writing prospectuses prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you. Neither we nor the Selling Securityholders take responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. Neither we nor the Selling Securityholders will make an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

We may also provide a prospectus supplement or post-effective amendment to the Registration Statement to add information to, or update or change information contained in, this prospectus. You should read both this prospectus and any applicable prospectus supplement or post-effective amendment to the Registration Statement together with the additional information to which we refer you in the sections of this prospectus entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.”

On July 9, 2021 (the “Closing Date”), Spartan Acquisition Corp. II, a Delaware corporation and our predecessor company (“Spartan”), consummated the previously announced merger pursuant to that certain Business Combination Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of January 23, 2021 (the “Business Combination Agreement”), by and among Spartan, SL Invest I Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan (“MergerCo1”), SL Invest II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan (“MergerCo2”), SL Financial Investor I LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan (“Holdings I”), SL Financial Investor II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan (“Holdings II”), SL Financial Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan (“Spartan Sub”), SL Financial LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan Sub (“OpCo Merger Sub” and collectively with MergerCo1, MergerCo2, Holdings I, Holdings II and Spartan Sub, the “Spartan Subsidiaries”), Sunlight Financial LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Sunlight LLC”), FTV-Sunlight, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“FTV Blocker”), and Tiger Co-Invest B Sunlight Blocker, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Tiger Blocker,” and collectively with FTV Blocker, the “Blockers”). The transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement are collectively referred to herein as the “Business Combination.” Pursuant to the terms of the Business Combination Agreement, at the closing of the Business Combination (the “Closing”), among other things:

(a)

OpCo Merger Sub merged with and into Sunlight LLC, with Sunlight LLC surviving the merger (the “OpCo Merger”);

(b)

immediately following the OpCo Merger, (i) MergerCo1 merged with and into FTV Blocker, with FTV Blocker surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan (the “First FTV Blocker Merger”) and immediately thereafter, FTV Blocker merged with and into Holdings I, with Holdings I surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan (the “Second FTV Blocker Merger” and together with the First FTV Blocker Merger, the “FTV Blocker Mergers”) and (ii) MergerCo2 merged with and into Tiger Blocker, with Tiger Blocker surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan (the “First Tiger Blocker Merger”) and immediately thereafter, Tiger Blocker merged with and into Holdings II, with Holdings II surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan (the “Second Tiger Blocker Merger” and together with the First Tiger Blocker Merger, the “Tiger Blocker Mergers,” and together with the FTV Blocker Mergers, the “Blocker Mergers”); and

(c)

immediately following the effective time of the Blocker Mergers (the “Blocker Mergers Effective Time”), Spartan contributed all of its remaining assets (other than the membership interests in each of Holdings I and Holdings II and the stock in Spartan Sub) to Spartan Sub and Spartan Sub in

TABLE OF CONTENTS

turn contributed such assets to Sunlight LLC in exchange for units representing limited liability company interests in Sunlight LLC designated as Class X Units (“Sunlight Class X Units”) and warrants of Sunlight LLC.

On the Closing Date, and in connection with the Closing, Spartan changed its name to Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. The post-Business Combination company is organized in an “Up-C” structure, such that all of the material assets of the combined company are held by, and substantially all of Sunlight’s business operations are conducted by, Sunlight LLC, and the only material asset of Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. (together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, Spartan Sub, Holdings I and Holdings II, “Sunlight”) will be its indirect equity interests in Sunlight LLC. Sunlight currently owns 86,373,596 Class X Units of Sunlight LLC, constituting 100% of the issued and outstanding Class X Units and approximately 64.1% of the outstanding Sunlight Units (as defined herein), and Spartan Sub controls Sunlight LLC as its sole managing member in accordance with the terms of the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement (as defined herein).

The securities that are the subject of this prospectus are those that Sunlight is obligated to register pursuant to the registration obligations in the Subscription Agreements (as defined herein) and the Investor Rights Agreement (as defined herein), among other agreements.

Unless the context indicates otherwise, references in this prospectus to the “Company,” “Sunlight Financial Holdings,” “Sunlight,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to the post-Business Combination company Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (including Sunlight LLC). References to “Spartan” refer to our predecessor company prior to the consummation of the Business Combination.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this prospectus to:

•

“Apollo” are to Apollo Global Management, Inc. (NYSE: APO), a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries;

•

“Audit Committee” are to the audit committee of the Sunlight Board;

•

“Blocker Holders” are to the FTV Blocker Holder and Tiger Blocker Holder, collectively;

•

“Blocker Mergers” are to the FTV Blocker Mergers and the Tiger Blocker Mergers;

•

“Blocker Mergers Effective Time” are to the effective time of the Blocker Mergers;

•

“Blockers” are to FTV Blocker and Tiger Blocker;

•

“Business Combination” are to the transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement;

•

“Business Combination Agreement” are to that certain Business Combination Agreement, dated as of January 23, 2021, by and among Spartan, MergerCo1, MergerCo2, Holdings I, Holdings II, Spartan Sub, OpCo Merger Sub, Sunlight LLC, FTV Blocker and Tiger Blocker;

•

“bylaws” are to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunlight, effective as of July 9, 2021;

•

“CFPB” are to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau;

•

“Class A Common Stock” are to Sunlight Financial Holdings’ Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share;

•

“Class A Units” are to, collectively, Class A-1 Units, Class A-2 Units and Class A-3 Units which represented limited liability company interests in Sunlight LLC prior to the Closing;

•

“Class B Common Stock” are to (a) prior to giving effect to the Second A&R Charter, Spartan’s Class B Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and (b) after giving effect to the Second A&R Charter, Sunlight Financial Holdings’ Class B Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share;

•

“Class B Units” are to Class B Units which represented limited liability company interests in Sunlight LLC prior to the Closing;

•

“Class C Common Stock” are to Sunlight Financial Holdings’ Class C Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share;

•

“Class C Units” are to, collectively, Class C-1 Units, Class C-2 Units, Class C-2AD Units, Class C-3 Units and Class C-3AD Units which represented limited liability company interests in Sunlight LLC, prior to the Closing;

•

“Closing” are to the closing of the Business Combination;

•

“Closing Date” are to the date on which the Closing occurred;

•

“Code” are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;

•

“Common Stock” are to (a) prior to giving effect to the Business Combination, the Class A Common Stock and the Class B Common Stock, and (b) after giving effect to the Business Combination, the Class A Common Stock and the Class C Common Stock;

•

“Compensation Committee” are to the compensation committee of the Sunlight Board;

•

“COVID-19” are to the ongoing novel coronavirus pandemic;

•

“DGCL” are to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware;

•

“Exchange Act” are to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;

•

“FCRA” are to the Fair Credit Reporting Act;

•

“First FTV Blocker Merger” are to the merger of MergerCo1 with and into FTV Blocker, with FTV Blocker surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

“First Tiger Blocker Merger” are to the merger of MergerCo2 with and into Tiger Blocker, with Tiger Blocker surviving the merger as wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan;

•

“Flow-Through Sellers” are to the Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders and the holders of Sunlight LLC Warrants;

•

“FTV Blocker” are to FTV-Sunlight, Inc., a Delaware corporation;

•

“FTV Blocker Holder” are to FTV V, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership;

•

“FTV Blocker Mergers” are to the First FTV Blocker Merger and the Second FTV Blocker Merger;

•

“FTV Parties” are to the FTV Blocker Holder and its respective affiliates;

•

“Founder Shares” are to shares of our Class B Common Stock;

•

“GAAP” are to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States;

•

“Holdings I” are to SL Financial Investor I LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan;

•

“Holdings II” are to SL Financial Investor II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan;

•

“home improvements” are to Sunlight’s line of business related to home improvements, such as roofing, siding, windows, doors, HVAC systems and insulation;

•

“initial stockholders” are to the holders of our Founder Shares, which included the Sponsor and our independent directors;

•

“Initial Public Offering” or “IPO” are to Spartan’s initial public offering of units, which closed on November 30, 2020;

•

“Investor Rights Agreement” are to that certain Investor Rights Agreement entered into concurrently with the Closing, by and among Sunlight Financial Holdings and certain stockholders named therein;

•

“IPO Registration Rights Agreement” are to that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 24, 2020, by and among Spartan, the Sponsor and the other holders of our Founder Shares;

•

“IRS” are to the Internal Revenue Service;

•

“JOBS Act” are to the U.S. legislation Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012;

•

“Letter Agreement” are to that certain letter agreement, dated as of November 24, 2020, by and among Spartan, the Sponsor and Spartan’s officers and directors;

•

“Letter Agreement Amendment” are to that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Letter Agreement, dated as of January 23, 2021, by and among Spartan, the Sponsor and Spartan’s officers and directors;

•

“LTIP” are to the Sunlight Financial LLC 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated effective as of December 13, 2017, which was terminated in connection with the Closing;

•

“LTIP Unitholders” are to persons and entities who own LTIP Units (other than forfeited and unallocated LTIP Units);

•

“LTIP Units” are to units issued under the LTIP and having the terms set forth in the LTIP and the applicable award agreements granted certain employees and executive officers of Sunlight LLC pursuant to the LTIP prior to the Closing;

•

“management” or our “management team” are to our officers and directors;

•

“MergerCo1” are to SL Invest I Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan;

•

“MergerCo2” are to SL Invest II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

“Note” are to the unsecured promissory note from an affiliate of the Sponsor for an aggregate of up to $300,000 to cover expenses related to the IPO;

•

“NYSE” are to the New York Stock Exchange;

•

“OpCo Merger” are to the merger of OpCo Merger Sub with and into Sunlight LLC, with Sunlight LLC surviving the merger as a subsidiary of Spartan Sub and with the Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders and the Blockers being the other owners of Sunlight;

•

“OpCo Merger Effective Time” are to the effective time of the OpCo Merger;

•

“OpCo Merger Sub” are to SL Financial LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan Sub;

•

“PIPE Financing” are to the private offering of Class A Common Stock to certain investors in connection with the Business Combination;

•

“PIPE Funds” are to the proceeds from the PIPE Financing;

•

“PIPE Investor” are to each investor in the PIPE Financing, and “PIPE Investors” are to the investors, collectively, in the PIPE Financing;

•

“PIPE Shares” are to the shares of Class A Common Stock that are issued in the PIPE Financing;

•

“POS” are to point-of-sale;

•

“Preferred Stock” are to (a) prior to giving effect to the Business Combination, Spartan’s Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and (b) after giving effect to the Business Combination, Sunlight Financial Holdings’ Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share;

•

“Prior Sunlight LLC Agreement” are to the Fourth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Sunlight, dated as of May 25, 2018, as amended or otherwise modified;

•

“private placement warrants” are to the warrants issued to the Sponsor in a private placement simultaneously with the closing of the IPO, which are exercisable for shares of Class Common Stock;

•

“Proprietary Information” are to intellectual property, trade secrets and confidential and proprietary information;

•

“public shares” are to shares of our Class A Common Stock;

•

“public stockholders” are to the holders of our public shares;

•

“public warrants” are to the public warrants of Sunlight, which are exercisable for shares of Class A Common Stock;

•

“Registration Statement” are to this registration statement on Form S-1, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time;

•

“Restricted Stock” are to the shares of Class A Common Stock or Sunlight Class EX Units and corresponding number of shares of Class C Common Stock held by certain persons that are subject to lock-up transfer restrictions for specified periods;

•

“Sarbanes-Oxley Act” are to the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002;

•

“SEC” are to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission;

•

“Second A&R Charter” are to that certain Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Spartan adopted in connection with Closing;

•

“Second FTV Blocker Merger” are to the merger of FTV Blocker with and into Holdings I, with Holdings I surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan;

•

“Second Tiger Blocker Merger” are to the merger of Tiger Blocker with and into Holdings II, with Holdings II surviving the merger as wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan;

•

“Securities Act” are to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended;

•

“Sellers” are to the Blocker Holders and Flow-Through Sellers;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

“solar systems” are to Sunlight’s residential energy solar systems line of business;

•

“Spartan” are to Spartan Acquisition Corp. II, a Delaware corporation, our predecessor company prior to the consummation of the Business Combination;

•

“Spartan Board” are to the former board of directors of Spartan;

•

“Spartan Charter” are to Spartan’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation;

•

“Spartan Sub” are to SL Financial Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan;

•

“Spartan Subsidiaries” are to MergerCo1, MergerCo2, Holdings I, Holdings II, Spartan Sub and OpCo Merger Sub;

•

“Sponsor” are to Spartan Acquisition Sponsor II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which is an affiliate of a private investment fund managed by Apollo;

•

“Subscription Agreements” are to those certain separate subscription agreements, dated as of January 23, 2021, by and among Spartan and the investors named therein;

•

“Sunlight” are to are to Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation, the name of Spartan after giving effect to the Business Combination, together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, Spartan Sub, Holdings I and Holdings II;

•

“Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement” are to that certain Fifth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Sunlight LLC, entered into by and among Sunlight LLC, Sunlight, Spartan Sub and certain members named therein concurrently with the Closing;

•

“Sunlight Board” are to the board of directors of Sunlight;

•

“Sunlight Class EX Units” and “Class EX Units” are to a class of common units representing limited liability company interests in Sunlight LLC designated in the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement as Class EX Units;

•

“Sunlight Class X Units” and “Class X Units” are to the units representing limited liability company interests in Sunlight LLC designated in the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement as Class X Units;

•

“Sunlight Financial Holdings” are to Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation, the name of Spartan after giving effect to the Business Combination, together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, Spartan Sub, Holdings I and Holdings II;

•

“Sunlight LLC” are to Sunlight Financial LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;

•

“Sunlight LLC Warrants” are to previously outstanding warrants to purchase units representing limited liability company interests in Sunlight LLC;

•

“Sunlight Platform” or “Orange®” are to Sunlight’s proprietary technology-enabled point-of-sale financing platform;

•

“Sunlight Units” are to the Sunlight Class X Units and the Sunlight Class EX Units;

•

“Sunlight Warrants” are to our public warrants and private placement warrants, collectively;

•

“Tax Receivable Agreement” are to that certain Tax Receivable Agreement, entered into by and among Sunlight Financial Holdings, the TRA Holders and the Agent, each as named therein, concurrently with the Closing;

•

“TCJ Act” are to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act;

•

“Tech Capital Warrants” are to the outstanding warrants held by Tech Capital LLC, exercisable for an aggregate of 627,780 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $7.715 per share;

•

“Tiger” are to Tiger Blocker Holder and Tiger Infrastructure Partners Sunlight Feeder LP, collectively;

•

“Tiger Blocker” are to Tiger Co-Invest B Sunlight Blocker, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

“Tiger Blocker Holder” are to Tiger Infrastructure Partners Co-Invest B LP, a Delaware limited partnership;

•

“Tiger Blocker Mergers” are to the First Tiger Blocker Merger and the Second Tiger Blocker Merger;

•

“Tiger Parties” are to Tiger Infrastructure Partners Sunlight Feeder LP, a Delaware limited partnership, Tiger Blocker and their respective affiliates;

•

“TRA Holders” are the Blocker Holders and the Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders;

•

“Transfer Agent” are to Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company;

•

“Trust Account” are to the trust account that holds the proceeds (including interest not previously released to Spartan to pay its franchise and income taxes) from the IPO and a concurrent private placement of private placement warrants to the Sponsor;

•

“UDAAP” are to Section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which prohibits unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices;

•

“Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders” are to certain persons and entities, other than the Blockers, who own Sunlight Units (other than forfeited and unallocated Sunlight Units);

•

“vendors” are to Sunlight’s third party vendors; and

•

“VIE” are to variable interest entity.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Company makes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act in this prospectus and in documents incorporated by reference herein. All statements, other than statements of present or historical fact included in or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, regarding the Company’s future financial performance, as well as the Company’s strategy, future operations, future operating results, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” “project” or the negative of such terms and other similar expressions that predict or indicate future events or trends or that are not statements of historical matters. These statements are based on various assumptions, whether or not identified herein, and on the current expectations of the Company’s management and are not predictions of actual performance. These forward-looking statements are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to serve as, and must not be relied on by any investor as a guarantee, an assurance, a prediction or a definitive statement of, fact or probability. Actual events and circumstances are difficult or impossible to predict and may differ from assumptions, and such differences may be material. Many actual events and circumstances are beyond the control of the Company. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about the Company that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. If any of these risks materialize or the Company’s assumptions prove incorrect, actual results could differ materially from the results implied by these forward-looking statements. There may be additional risks that the Company does not presently know or that the Company currently believes are immaterial that could also cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s expectations, plans or forecasts of future events and views as of the date hereof. The Company anticipates that subsequent events and developments will cause the Company’s assessments to change. However, while the Company may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, except as otherwise required by applicable law, the Company specifically disclaims any duty to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the statements in this section, to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this prospectus. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing the Company’s assessments as of any date subsequent to the date hereof. Accordingly, undue reliance should not be placed upon the forward-looking statements. The Company cautions you that these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of the Company.

The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements:

•

Sunlight has incurred net losses in the past, and Sunlight may be unable to sustain profitability in the future.

•

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and other health epidemics and outbreaks could adversely affect Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

•

If Sunlight fails to manage its operations and growth effectively, Sunlight may be unable to execute its business plan, maintain high levels of customer services and support or adequately address competitive challenges.

•

Sunlight may in the future expand to new industry verticals outside of the U.S. solar system and home improvement industries, and failure to comply with applicable regulations, accurately predict demand or growth, or build a process valued in those new industries could have an adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.

•

To the extent that Sunlight seeks to grow through future acquisitions, or other strategic investments or alliances, Sunlight may not be able to do so effectively.

•

A material reduction in the retail price of electricity charged by electric utilities, other retail electricity providers, or other energy sources as compared to potential savings for purchasing and using a solar system or an increase in pricing for purchasing and using a solar system above the cost of other

TABLE OF CONTENTS

energy sources could result in a lower demand for solar systems, which could have an adverse impact on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

•

Sunlight’s inability to compete successfully or maintain or improve Sunlight’s market share and margins could adversely affect its business.

•

Cyber-attacks and other security breaches could have an adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.

•

Disruptions in the operation of Sunlight’s computer systems and those of its critical third-party service providers and capital providers could have an adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.

•

Existing regulations and policies and changes to these regulations and policies may present technical, regulatory, and economic barriers to the purchase and use of solar energy systems, which may significantly reduce demand for our loan products.

•

Sunlight’s growth is dependent on its contractor network and in turn the quality of the service and products they provide to their customers, and Sunlight’s failure to retain or replace existing contractors, to grow its contractor network or the number of Sunlight loans offered through its existing network, or increases in loan delinquencies due to any deficiencies in Sunlight’s contractor underwriting practices, could adversely impact Sunlight’s business.

•

Sunlight’s revenue is impacted, to a significant extent, by the general economy and the financial performance of its capital providers and contractors.

•

If assumptions or estimates Sunlight uses in preparing its financial statements are incorrect or are required to change, Sunlight’s reported results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition may be adversely affected.

•

Sunlight’s management has limited experience in operating a public company.

•

A significant portion of Sunlight’s total outstanding shares are restricted from immediate resale but may be sold into the market in the near future. This could cause the market price of its Class A Common Stock to drop significantly, even if its business is doing well.

The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other risk factors included herein. Forward-looking statements reflect current views about Sunlight’s plans, strategies and prospects, which are based on information available as of the date of this prospectus. Except to the extent required by applicable law, Sunlight undertakes no obligation (and expressly disclaims any such obligation) to update or revise the forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside our control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from these statements. Therefore, you should not place undue reliance on those statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY OF THE PROSPECTUS

This summary highlights selected information from this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that is important to you in making an investment decision. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information included in this prospectus. Before making your investment decision with respect to our securities, you should carefully read this entire prospectus, including the information under “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Unless the context indicates otherwise, references in this prospectus to the “Company,” “Sunlight Financial Holdings,” “Sunlight Financial,” “Sunlight,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to the post-Business Combination company Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (including Sunlight LLC). References to “Spartan” refer to our predecessor company prior to the consummation of the Business Combination.

Sunlight

Sunlight is a business-to-business-to-consumer, technology-enabled point-of-sale (“POS”) financing platform that provides residential solar and home improvement contractors the ability to offer seamless POS financing to their customers when purchasing residential solar systems or other home improvements. The resulting loans are funded by Sunlight’s network of capital providers who, by partnering with Sunlight, gain access to a difficult-to-reach loan market, best-in-class consumer credit underwriting and attractive risk adjusted returns. These loans are facilitated by Sunlight’s proprietary technology platform, Orange® (the “Sunlight Platform” or “Orange®”), through which Sunlight offers instant credit decisions to homeowners nationwide at the POS on behalf of Sunlight’s various capital providers. Since Sunlight’s founding in 2014, Sunlight has facilitated over $4.8 billion of loans through the Sunlight Platform in partnership with over 1,500 contractor relationships.

The mailing address of Sunlight’s principal executive office is 101 N. Tryon Street, Suite 1000, Charlotte, North Carolina 28246, and its telephone number is (888) 315-0822. Our website is located at https://sunlightfinancial.com. Our website and the information contained on, or accessed through, our website are not part of this prospectus, and you should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus when making a decision as to whether to invest in the securities offered hereby.

For more information about Sunlight, see the sections entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors” and the financial statements included herein.

Completed Business Combination

On the Closing Date, Spartan consummated the previously announced Business Combination with Sunlight LLC pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement and changed its name to Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. At the Closing, among other things, (a) OpCo Merger Sub merged with and into Sunlight with Sunlight surviving the merger, (b) MergerCo1 merged with and into FTV Blocker, with FTV Blocker surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan and immediately thereafter, FTV Blocker merged with and into Holdings I, with Holdings I surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan, (c) MergerCo2 merged with and into Tiger Blocker, with Tiger Blocker surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan and immediately thereafter, Tiger Blocker merged with and into Holdings II, with

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Holdings II surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Spartan and (d) following the Blocker Mergers Effective Time, Spartan contributed all of its remaining assets (other than the membership interests in each of Holdings I, Holdings II and Spartan Sub) to Spartan Sub and Spartan Sub in turn contributed such assets to Sunlight. The post-Business Combination company is organized in an “Up-C” structure, such that all of the material assets of the combined company are held by, and substantially all of Sunlight’s business operations are conducted by, Sunlight LLC, and the only material asset of Sunlight is its indirect equity interests in Sunlight LLC. Sunlight currently owns 86,373,596 Class X Units of Sunlight LLC, constituting 100% of the issued and outstanding Class X Units and approximately 64.1% of the outstanding Sunlight Units (as defined herein), and Spartan Sub controls Sunlight LLC as its sole managing member in accordance with the terms of the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement (as defined herein).

In connection with the Closing, the securities of Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. now consist of the following:

Class A Common Stock, which has both voting and economic rights. Holders of the Class A Common Stock consist of the Blocker Holders, the LTIP Unitholders, the public stockholders, the PIPE Investors and the initial stockholders.

Class C Common Stock, which has only voting rights. Holders of the Class C Common Stock consist of Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders.

Sunlight Warrants (including public warrants and private placement warrants), which are exercisable for shares of Class A Common Stock. The Holders of the Sunlight Warrants consist of the public warrantholders and the Sponsor (which owns the private placement warrants).

The securities of Sunlight LLC now consist of the following:

Class X Units and Class EX Units, which Class EX Units have economic rights only. Holders of the Class EX Units and Class X Units consist of the Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders and Sunlight, respectively.

The Tech Capital Warrants, which are exercisable for shares of Class A Common Stock.

Our Class A Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SUNL” and our publicly-traded warrants are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “SUNL WS”.

The following diagram illustrates the ownership structure of Sunlight as of September 2, 2021, prior to giving effect to this offering. Percentages are based on (i) 84,837,655 shares (excludes 1,535,941 of shares held by Sunlight in respect of net withholding for tax payments) of Class A Common Stock outstanding; (ii) 47,595,455 shares of Class C Common Stock and Class EX Units of Sunlight LLC outstanding; and (iii) 86,373,596 Class X Units of Sunlight LLC outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

[MISSING IMAGE: TM2123257D1-FC_BUSCOMP4CLR.JPG]

Risk Factors

Investing in our securities involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks described in “Risk Factors” beginning on page 16 before making a decision to invest in our Class A Common Stock. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations would likely be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our securities would likely decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Set forth below is a summary of some of the principal risks we face:

•

Sunlight has incurred net losses in the past, and Sunlight may be unable to sustain profitability in the future.

•

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and other health epidemics and outbreaks could adversely affect Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

•

To the extent that Sunlight seeks to grow through future acquisitions, or other strategic investments or alliances, Sunlight may not be able to do so effectively.

•

TABLE OF CONTENTS

sources could result in a lower demand for solar systems, which could have an adverse impact on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

•

Sunlight’s inability to compete successfully or maintain or improve Sunlight’s market share and margins could adversely affect its business.

•

Disruptions in the operation of Sunlight’s computer systems and those of its critical third-party service providers and capital providers could have an adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.

•

Sunlight’s growth is dependent on its contractor network, and its failure to retain or replace existing contractors or to grow its contractor network or the number of Sunlight loans offered through its existing network could adversely impact Sunlight’s business.

•

Sunlight’s revenue is impacted, to a significant extent, by the general economy and the financial performance of its capital providers and contractors.

•

If assumptions or estimates Sunlight uses in preparing its financial statements are incorrect or are required to change, Sunlight’s reported results of operations, liquidity and financial condition may be adversely affected.

•

Sunlight’s management has limited experience in operating a public company.

•

Sunlight’s stock price will be volatile, and you may not be able to sell shares at or above the price at which you executed your purchase.

•

Sunlight has never paid cash dividends on its capital stock, and does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE OFFERING

Issuer

Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc.

Issuance of Class A Common Stock

Shares of Class A Common Stock Issuable by Us

27,777,780 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Sunlight Warrants and the Tech Capital Warrants; and

1,712,711 shares of Class A Common Stock in respect of certain shares withheld by us for tax payments (i) in connection with the Closing and (ii) anticipated on a go-forward basis

Shares of Class A Common Stock Outstanding Prior to Such Exercise and Issuance

84,837,655 shares (excludes 1,535,941 shares held by Sunlight in respect of net withholding for tax payments)

Shares of Common Stock Outstanding Assuming Such Exercise and Issuance

114,151,376 shares

Exercise Price of Sunlight Warrants

$11.50 per share, subject to adjustment as described herein

Exercise Price of Tech Capital Warrants

$7.715 per share

Use of Proceeds Related to the Sunlight Warrants and Tech Capital Warrants

We will receive proceeds equal to the aggregate exercise price from any exercises of the Sunlight Warrants and the Tech Capital Warrants, or equal to the applicable Cash Election Amount (as defined in the Sunlight A&R LLCA), assuming the exercise of such warrants, or redemption of such Class C Common Stock (and Class EX Units), for cash. We expect to use the net proceeds from the exercise of such warrants, and redemption of such shares and units, for general corporate purposes. See “Use of Proceeds.”

See below for a description of the use of proceeds from the sale by us of the 1,712,711 shares of Class A Common Stock in respect of certain shares withheld by us for tax payments (i) in connection with the Closing and (ii) anticipated on a go-forward basis.

Sale of Class A Common Stock and Resale of Class A Common Stock and Private Placement Warrants

Class A Common Stock Offered by Sunlight

Up to 1,712,711 shares of Class A Common Stock in respect of certain shares withheld by us for tax payments (i) in connection with the Closing and (ii) anticipated on a go-forward basis

Class A Common Stock Offered by the Selling Stockholders

Up to 122,157,418 shares

Private Placement Warrants to be sold by the Selling Warrantholders

9,900,000 warrants

Use of Proceeds

We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares of Class A Common Stock or private placement warrants by the Selling Securityholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below and in the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements” before making an investment decision. Our business, prospects, financial condition, or operating results could be harmed by any of these risks, as well as other risks not known to us or that we consider immaterial as of the date of this prospectus. The trading price of our securities could decline due to any of these risks, and, as a result, you may lose all or part of your investment.

Summary of Principal Risks Associated with Sunlight’s Business

•

Sunlight has incurred net losses in the past, and Sunlight may be unable to sustain profitability in the future.

•

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and other health epidemics and outbreaks could adversely affect Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

•

To the extent that Sunlight seeks to grow through future acquisitions, or other strategic investments or alliances, Sunlight may not be able to do so effectively.

•

A material reduction in the retail price of electricity charged by electric utilities, other retail electricity providers or other energy sources as compared to potential savings for purchasing and using a solar system or an increase in pricing for purchasing and using a solar system above the cost of other energy sources could result in a lower demand for solar systems, which could have an adverse impact on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

•

Sunlight’s inability to compete successfully or maintain or improve Sunlight’s market share and margins could adversely affect its business.

•

Disruptions in the operation of Sunlight’s computer systems and those of its critical third-party service providers and capital providers could have an adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.

•

Sunlight’s revenue is impacted, to a significant extent, by the general economy and the financial performance of its capital providers and contractors.

•

If assumptions or estimates Sunlight uses in preparing its financial statements are incorrect or are required to change, Sunlight’s reported results of operations, liquidity and financial condition may be adversely affected.

•

Sunlight’s management has limited experience in operating a public company.

•

Sunlight’s stock and warrant prices will be volatile, and you may not be able to sell shares at or above the price at which you executed your purchase.

•

Sunlight has never paid cash dividends on its capital stock, and does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.

•

Sunlight has identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness could continue to adversely affect Sunlight’s ability to report its results of operations and financial condition accurately and in a timely manner.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Risks Related to Sunlight’s Business

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the financial statements of Sunlight and notes to the financial statements included herein.

Sunlight has incurred net losses in the past, and Sunlight may be unable to sustain profitability in the future.

Sunlight commenced operations as a “start-up” in 2015 and incurred net losses while developing its business, including net losses of $6.5 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively (based on financial statements prior to adopting GAAP). These historical net losses were due to a number of factors, including incurring expenses to fund the development of Sunlight’s technology and the build out of its operational capacities (including, in 2018, as associated with the start of Sunlight’s home improvement line of business), obtaining financing and taking other actions associated with scaling a business generally, and lower revenues as Sunlight created its distribution channels through contractor relationships and funding networks for a diverse set of loan products. Sunlight expects to continue to incur substantial expenses as Sunlight expands its loan product offerings and operations and implements additional technology innovations and infrastructure to support its growth. In addition, as a public company, Sunlight will incur significant additional legal, accounting and other expenses that it did not incur as a private company. Sunlight can provide no assurance that its revenue will grow rapidly enough to absorb these expenses or other costs that it may incur. Sunlight’s ability to sustain profitability in both the short term and long term depends on a number of factors, across both its residential energy solar systems (“solar systems”) line of business and its line of business related to home improvements, such as roofing, siding, windows, doors, HVAC systems and insulation (collectively, referred to as “home improvements”), including:

•

Sunlight’s ability to maintain its margins by stabilizing or lowering its cost of capital with its existing funding partners and/or by engaging new capital providers on favorable economic terms to Sunlight;

•

originating increased funded volumes through its existing contractor distribution channels and by adding additional contractors to the network of contractors selling Sunlight’s loan products;

•

expanding the funding commitments of existing capital providers and/or adding new capital providers to fund increasing volumes of credit applications;

•

maintaining a low cost structure by optimizing its operational processes across increasing funded volume; and

•

Sunlight’s continuing ability to remain apace with the point of sale market by continuing to innovate and update its product offerings, services and technology.

Sunlight can provide no assurance that it will be able to sustain or increase its profitability in the future.

The ongoing novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic and other health epidemics and outbreaks could adversely affect Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic continues to be a rapidly evolving situation. The COVID-19 pandemic and efforts to respond to it have resulted in widespread adverse impacts on the global economy and on Sunlight’s employees, capital providers, contractors, target consumer base, third-party vendors (“vendors”) and other parties with whom Sunlight has business relations. Social distancing guidelines, stay-at-home orders and similar government measures associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as actions by individuals to reduce their potential exposure to the virus, contributed to a decline in credit applications and funded volumes in the first and second quarters of 2020. For solar system loans, Sunlight attributes this decline to a significant disruption to solar systems contractors’ sales model, which prior to such public health orders associated with the COVID-19 pandemic had been to sell solar systems primarily door to door, resulting in a decrease in the number of solar system sales and installations and, consequently, a decrease in credit applications and funded loans. Credit applications and funded loans for home improvements were similarly adversely affected. Sunlight believes that the decline in credit applications and funded loans was primarily attributable to consumers’ efforts to avoid infection in the early periods of the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COVID-19 pandemic, as sales for large portions of the market tended to be conducted in person at potential consumers’ homes and at home sales conventions, which were canceled.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Sunlight and its contractors have modified certain business and workforce practices (including those related to solar system sales, installation and servicing solar systems and employee work locations) to conform to government restrictions and best practices encouraged by governmental and regulatory authorities in the markets in which Sunlight offers loan products. Such modifications on the solar systems side, including converting to a technology-based sales model, have largely allowed contractors offering Sunlight loan products to continue to sell and install solar systems and, accordingly, for Sunlight to continue to offer related loans. The home improvement market remains less able to convert to a technology-based sales process due primarily to the smaller average size of the contractor participants, which means that Sunlight’s home improvement credit applications and funded loan volumes have not recovered, and may not recover in the future, to the same degree as they have in connection with its solar systems line of business. If the COVID-19 pandemic or other health epidemic or outbreaks are significantly prolonged, or more stringent health and safety guidelines are adopted (e.g., travel bans, border closures, quarantines, stay-at-home orders and business shutdowns, etc.), Sunlight and its solar systems contractors’ ability to continue selling and installing solar systems and home improvements may be adversely impacted, which could have a corresponding adverse impact on solar system and home improvement credit applications for Sunlight loans and Sunlight funded loans and could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Worsening economic conditions could result from the continued spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and the potential for related public health measures, as described above. The effects of the economic downturn associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, and other economic factors, may increase unemployment and reduce consumer credit ratings and credit availability, which may adversely affect Sunlight’s ability to originate new loans as forecasted and/or that are of the credit quality desired by Sunlight’s capital providers. Such an outcome could cause Sunlight’s capital providers to increase pricing to adjust for increased credit risk in a down economy and thereby erode Sunlight’s margins and negatively impact Sunlight’s future financial performance and the price of the Sunlight Financial Holdings’ Class A Common Stock. Finally, if solar system and/or home improvement supply chains become significantly disrupted due to additional outbreaks of the COVID-19 pandemic or other health epidemics or outbreaks or because more stringent health and safety guidelines are implemented, the ability of its contractors to sell or install solar systems or to sell or complete home improvements could be adversely impacted.

Sunlight is currently unable to predict the full impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have, directly or indirectly, on its partners, supply channels, the capital markets generally or otherwise, or on Sunlight’s business, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The ultimate impact will depend on future developments, including, among other things, the efficacy of full administration of the COVID-19 vaccines, the spread of vaccine resistant strains of the virus, the ultimate duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, the depth and duration of the economic downturn and other economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the consequences of governmental and other measures designed to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, actions taken by governmental authorities, capital providers, contractors, vendors and other parties with whom Sunlight has business relations, Sunlight’s ability and the ability of its capital providers, contractors, target consumer base, vendors and other parties with whom Sunlight has business relations to adapt to operating in a changed environment, and the timing and extent to which normal economic and operating conditions resume.

If market demand for solar systems does not continue to develop as anticipated by Sunlight or takes longer to develop than Sunlight anticipates, Sunlight may not be able to originate loans for the purchase and installation of solar systems at the rate anticipated and incorporated into Sunlight’s forecast.

The solar systems market is at a relatively early stage of development. If market demand for solar systems fails to continue to develop sufficiently or takes longer to develop than Sunlight anticipates, Sunlight may be unable to facilitate the origination of loans for the purchase and installation of solar systems to grow its business at the rate Sunlight anticipates in its forecast.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Many factors may affect the demand for solar systems, including the following:

•

monthly and/or lifetime savings potential of purchasing and using a solar system, which is associated with the availability of (i) residential solar support programs, including government targets, subsidies, incentives in the form of tax credits, grants or similar programs, renewable portfolio standards and residential net metering rules and (ii) cost efficient equipment and solar loans on terms favorable to the consumers;

•

the relative pricing of other conventional and non-renewable energy sources, such as natural gas, coal, oil and other fossil fuels, wind, utility-scale solar, nuclear, geothermal and biomass;

•

performance, reliability and availability of energy generated by solar systems compared to conventional and other non-solar renewable energy sources;

•

availability and performance of energy storage technology, the ability to implement such technology for use in conjunction with solar systems and the cost competitiveness such technology provides to consumers as compared to costs for those consumers reliant on the conventional electrical grid or other sources of energy;

•

general economic conditions and the level of interest rates available to consumers to finance the purchase of solar systems and home improvements; and

•

the desirability of relying principally on renewable energy resources.

Sunlight cannot be certain if historical growth rates reflect future opportunities in the solar industry or whether growth anticipated by Sunlight will be fully realized. The failure or delay of solar systems to continue on a path towards increasing adoption could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

If Sunlight fails to manage its operations and growth effectively, Sunlight may be unable to execute its business plan, maintain high levels of customer service and support or adequately address competitive challenges.

Sunlight has experienced significant growth in recent periods measured by, among others, funded volumes, and Sunlight intends to continue the efforts to expand its business. This growth has placed, and any future growth may place, a strain on Sunlight’s management, operational and financial infrastructure. Sunlight’s growth requires its management to devote a significant amount of time and effort to maintain and expand its relationships with contractors, capital providers and other third parties, creating innovative new lending products that offer attractive financing options to consumers, improving its credit analysis and decisioning processes, arranging financing for Sunlight’s growth and managing its expansion into new markets.

In addition, Sunlight’s current and planned operations, personnel, information technology and other systems and procedures might be inadequate to support its future growth and may require Sunlight to make additional unanticipated investments in its infrastructure. Sunlight’s success and ability to further scale its business will depend, in part, on its ability to manage these changes in a cost-effective and efficient manner.

If Sunlight cannot manage its operations to meet the demands of its growth, Sunlight may be unable to meet market expectations regarding growth, opportunity and financial targets, take advantage of market opportunities, execute its business strategies successfully or respond to competitive pressures. This could also result in declines in the attractiveness or quality of the lending options that Sunlight provides, declines in consumer satisfaction, weakening of Sunlight’s relationships with its network of contractors, increased operational costs or lower margins on loans Sunlight originates or other operational difficulties. Any failure to effectively manage Sunlight’s operations and growth could adversely impact its reputation, business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

During the period from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021, Sunlight funded approximately 11% of its total solar system loan volume and, during the period from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021, 100% of its home improvement loan volume through a bank partnership arrangement. Pursuant to the terms of that arrangement, Sunlight must arrange for the sale of the loans to a third party within 180 days from origination for solar system loans and, beginning on August 1, 2021, for certain home improvement loans that have been on its bank partner’s balance sheet for greater than 12 months, subject to certain exceptions. If Sunlight is not able to arrange these sales, Sunlight may be required to purchase all or a portion of these loans, which could have a material adverse impact on Sunlight’s liquidity and financial condition and the stock price of Sunlight Financial Holdings. Sunlight is also required to purchase solar system loans funded through its bank partnership arrangement if those loans are charged off and home improvement loans funded through its bank partner if those loans are more than 60 days delinquent. A significant downturn in the performance of Sunlight-facilitated loans that are originated by Sunlight’s bank partner could have a material adverse impact on Sunlight’s liquidity and financial condition.

Currently a portion of solar system loans originated through Sunlight’s Platform and all home improvement loans originated through Sunlight’s Platform are funded by Sunlight’s bank partnership arrangement whereby loans are originated by Sunlight’s bank partner but held for sale to a third party. The terms of Sunlight’s bank partnership arrangement provide that such sales must occur within a certain period of time, subject to certain exceptions (180 days from origination for solar system loans and, with respect to certain home improvement loans that have been on its bank partner’s balance sheet for greater than 12 months, beginning on August 1, 2021). While Sunlight has not been required to date to purchase solar system loans from its bank partner due to the expiration of Sunlight’s bank partner’s agreed hold period, Sunlight cannot be certain that fluctuations in the credit markets or other market, regulatory or business factors will not impede Sunlight’s ability to source such third-party purchasers in the future, which could result in Sunlight being required to purchase all or part of unsold solar system loans. Sunlight’s arrangements with its bank partner also require that Sunlight purchase solar loans when subject to charge-off by Sunlight’s bank partner, and with respect to home improvement, any loan that becomes 60 days delinquent. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Sunlight repurchased and wrote off 49 loans from its bank partner, totaling $1.1 million, associated with the repurchase obligation concerning charge-offs and delinquencies. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, Sunlight repurchased and wrote off 17 and 51 loans from its bank partner, totaling $0.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, associated with the repurchase obligation concerning charge-offs and delinquencies. Sunlight acts as the administrator for its bank partner’s portfolio of Sunlight-facilitated loans, and Sunlight has access to comprehensive daily reporting regarding those loans, which allows it to track the status of loans, including days from origination, and monitors the performance of those loans on a loan-level basis.

Sunlight has entered into committed indirect funding program agreements with capital providers for the purchase of solar system and home improvement loans from Sunlight’s bank partner; however, these agreements require periodic extension and, based on market changes and shifts in credit appetite, Sunlight cannot predict whether these capital providers will elect to continue their commitment in the future. In addition, Sunlight’s indirect funding program agreements contain covenants and agreements relating to the origination of such loans and Sunlight’s financial condition. If Sunlight materially breaches these conditions and fails to cure them in the time allotted, the relevant capital provider may terminate its relationship with Sunlight. Such covenants and agreements generally include, among others, obligations related to funding volumes, concentration limits on certain loan products, Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”) score requirements, agreements related to Sunlight’s legal compliance in the origination process, underwriting requirements and milestone or other payment requirements. If an existing indirect capital provider terminates its relationship with Sunlight and Sunlight is unable to procure alternative agreements with new purchaser(s) of solar system and home improvement loans or increase commitments from other existing indirect capital providers in a timely manner and on acceptable terms, or at all, Sunlight’s business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Sunlight initiated its home improvement business in 2019 and its bank partner has originated approximately $74 million in home improvement loans. In February 2021, Sunlight entered into an indirect funding program agreement with a capital provider for the purchase of up to $400 million in home improvement loans from Sunlight’s bank partnership arrangement over an 18-month period. However, the foregoing agreement represents the sole commitment for the purchase of home improvement loans from

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sunlight’s bank partnership arrangement and will require periodic extension; accordingly, based on market changes and shifts in credit appetite, Sunlight cannot predict whether this capital provider will elect to continue its commitment in the future. In addition, Sunlight’s indirect home improvement loan funding program agreement contains covenants and agreements related to the origination of such loans and Sunlight’s financial condition similar to those described in the above paragraph with respect to program agreements for the purchase of solar system loans. If Sunlight’s existing indirect home improvement loan capital provider terminates its relationship with Sunlight and Sunlight is unable to procure alternative agreements with new third-party purchaser(s) of home improvement loans in a timely manner and on acceptable terms, or at all, then, beginning on August 1, 2021 Sunlight may be required to purchase any home improvement loans (with certain exceptions) that have been on its bank partner’s balance sheet for greater than 12 months, which could materially and adversely affect Sunlight’s liquidity and financial condition.

Restrictive covenants in certain of Sunlight’s debt agreements could limit its growth and its ability to finance its operations, fund its capital needs, respond to changing conditions and engage in other business activities that may be in Sunlight’s best interests.

Sunlight’s debt agreements impose operating and financial restrictions on Sunlight. These restrictions limit Sunlight’s ability to, among other things:

•

incur additional indebtedness;

•

make investments or loans;

•

create liens;

•

consummate mergers and similar fundamental changes;

•

make restricted payments;

•

make investments in unrestricted subsidiaries;

•

enter into transactions with affiliates; and

•

use the proceeds of asset sales.

Sunlight may be prevented from taking advantage of business opportunities that arise because of the limitations imposed by the restrictive covenants under its corporate debt agreement. The restrictions contained in the covenants could, among other things:

•

limit Sunlight’s ability to plan for, or react to, market conditions or meet capital needs or otherwise restrict Sunlight’s activities or business plan; and

•

adversely affect Sunlight’s ability to finance its operations, enter into acquisitions or divestitures or engage in other business activities that would be in Sunlight’s best interest.

A breach of any of these covenants or Sunlight’s inability to comply with the required financial ratios or financial condition tests could result in a default under Sunlight’s debt agreement that, if not timely cured or waived, could result in acceleration of all indebtedness outstanding thereunder and cross-default rights under other debt arrangements of Sunlight. In addition, in the event of an event of default under Sunlight’s debt facility, the affected lenders could accelerate such indebtedness and require repayment of all borrowings outstanding thereunder. Sunlight cannot be certain that it will have cash available in the future to repay its debt facility in the event that it becomes necessary to do so. If the amounts outstanding under Sunlight’s outstanding indebtedness or any of its other indebtedness, whether now or in the future, were to be accelerated and Sunlight did not have sufficient assets to repay in full the amounts owed to the lenders or to other debt holders, such parties could foreclose on the collateral granted by Sunlight to such debt holders, which could materially adversely affect Sunlight’s liquidity and financial condition or its ability to qualify as a going concern.

Additionally, Sunlight’s current corporate debt facility expires in April 2023. As of September 2, 2021, Sunlight’s corporate debt facility had outstanding borrowings of $20,612,705.00. Sunlight will have to negotiate an extension of its facility or establish a facility with another lender prior to that date. Sunlight cannot be certain that its current debt provider will extend the facility or that it will extend the facility on the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

same terms, or that Sunlight can obtain a new facility on the same or better terms. Sunlight may need to extend the facility or obtain a new facility on terms that contain additional covenants or requirements that further restrict Sunlight’s ability to take advantage of business opportunities, address market changes, make acquisitions or otherwise grow Sunlight’s business.

The loss of one or more members of Sunlight’s senior management or key employees may adversely affect its ability to implement its strategy.

Sunlight depends on its experienced management team and the loss of one or more key executives, including Sunlight’s Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, could have a negative impact on its business. Sunlight also depends on its ability to retain and motivate key employees and to attract qualified new employees. Sunlight may be unable to replace key members of its management team or key employees if such individuals elect to leave Sunlight. An inability to attract and retain sufficient managerial personnel who have industry experience and relationships could limit or delay Sunlight’s strategic efforts, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Fraudulent activity has become more sophisticated in the financial services industry and, if experienced at a material level by Sunlight or its capital providers in connection with loans originated through Sunlight’s Platform, it could negatively impact Sunlight’s reputation and business. Further, Sunlight could be subject to fraud by internal actors, which could also negatively impact its reputation and business.

Fraud occurs in the financial services industry and has increased as perpetrators become more sophisticated. Sunlight is subject to the risk of fraudulent activity generally perpetrated on participants in the financial markets and with respect to the policies and business practices of contractors, vendors and other third parties handling consumer information. Sunlight has experienced some immaterial fraud where fraudulent actors have obtained consumer personal identifying information in order to obtain fraudulent project payments from Sunlight. Sunlight has adopted increased fraud detection processes in both its commercial risk management and consumer underwriting processes in response to these events and the reported increase of fraud in the financial market. However, Sunlight’s resources, technologies and fraud prevention tools may be insufficient to accurately detect and prevent fraud in the future. The level of Sunlight’s fraud charge-offs could increase, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected if fraudulent activity were to significantly increase. High profile fraudulent activity also could negatively impact Sunlight’s brand and reputation, and negatively impact its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Further, Sunlight cannot be certain that it will not be subject to fraud from internal actors in the future. Any such fraud conducted could have a material negative impact on Sunlight’s reputation or business.

If the consumer underwriting and loan origination processes Sunlight uses contain errors or incorrect inputs from consumers or third parties (e.g., credit bureaus), Sunlight’s reputation and relationships with capital providers and contractors could be harmed. Further, economic changes resulting in increases in default rates could increase Sunlight’s cost of capital.

Sunlight’s ability to attract capital providers on economic terms consistent with its current capital provider funding facilities in part is dependent on Sunlight’s ability to effectively evaluate a consumer’s credit profile and likelihood of default and potential loss in accordance with Sunlight’s capital provider’s origination policies. To conduct this evaluation, Sunlight uses FICO scores and various credit bureau attributes. If any of the credit decisioning attributes Sunlight uses contain errors or the data provided by consumers or third parties (such as credit bureaus) is incorrect or stale, Sunlight’s approvals or denials may be determined inappropriately. Additionally, following the date of the credit report that Sunlight obtains and reviews, a consumer may default on, or become delinquent in the payment of, a pre-existing debt obligation, take on additional debt, lose his or her job or other sources of income, or experience other adverse financial events. If such inaccuracies or events are not detected prior to loan funding, the loan may have a greater risk of default than expected. Greater defaults could damage Sunlight’s reputation and relationships with contractors and capital providers, causing a decrease in Sunlight’s ability to originate loans, or result in an increase to Sunlight’s cost of capital causing a decrease in Sunlight margins.

Further, Sunlight’s cost of capital is also determined in part based on the default averages in Sunlight’s consumer loan borrower portfolio. If general economic conditions worsen significantly, or other events occur,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

resulting in an increase in delinquencies and defaults by Sunlight’s consumer loan borrowers and Sunlight is not able to adjust its underwriting processes to address the change in credit environment, Sunlight’s cost of capital may increase. Increases in Sunlight’s cost of capital may cause a decrease in Sunlight’s margins and have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Sunlight may in the future further expand into other industry verticals. There is no assurance that Sunlight will be able to successfully develop consumer financing products and services that are valued for these new industries. Sunlight’s investment of resources to develop consumer financing products and services for the new industries it enters may either be insufficient or result in expenses that are excessive as compared to the fees or other revenue that Sunlight may earn in launching such vertical. Additionally, Sunlight’s experience is in the U.S. solar system and home improvement industries and, therefore, industry participants in new industry verticals may not be receptive to its financing solutions and Sunlight may face competitors with more experience and resources. The borrower profile of consumers in new verticals may not be as attractive, in terms of average FICO scores or other attributes, as in current verticals, which may make it more difficult for Sunlight to find funding partners for these new verticals. As Sunlight explores additional opportunities, Sunlight can make no assurance that it will be able to accurately forecast demand (or the lack thereof) for a solution or that those industries will be receptive to Sunlight’s loan products or changes in loan products from time to time. Failure to predict demand or growth accurately in new industries could have a materially adverse impact on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Sunlight’s risk management processes and procedures may not be effective.

Sunlight’s risk management processes and procedures seek to appropriately balance risk and return and mitigate risks, and intend to identify, measure, monitor and control the types of risk to which Sunlight, its contractors and its capital providers are subject, including credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, strategic risk and operational risk. Credit risk is the risk of loss that arises when an obligor fails to meet the terms of an obligation. Market risk is the risk of loss due to changes in external market factors such as interest rates. Liquidity risk is the risk that financial conditions are adversely affected by an inability, or perceived inability, to meet obligations and support business growth. Strategic risk is the risk from changes in the business environment, improper implementation of decisions or inadequate responsiveness to changes in the business environment. Operational risk is the risk of loss arising from inadequate or failed processes, people or systems, external events (e.g., natural disasters), compliance, reputational or legal matters and includes those risks as they relate directly to Sunlight as well as to third parties with whom Sunlight contracts or otherwise does business.

Management of Sunlight’s risks depends, in part, upon the use of analytical and forecasting models. If these models are ineffective at predicting future losses or are otherwise inadequate, Sunlight may incur unexpected losses or otherwise be adversely affected. In addition, the information Sunlight uses in managing its credit and other risks may be inaccurate or incomplete as a result of error or fraud, both of which may be difficult to detect and avoid. There also may be risks that exist, or that develop in the future, that Sunlight has not appropriately anticipated, identified or mitigated, including when processes are changed or new products and services are introduced. If Sunlight’s risk management framework does not effectively identify and control its risks, Sunlight could suffer unexpected losses or be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.

To the extent that Sunlight seeks to grow through future acquisitions, or other strategic investments or alliances, Sunlight may not be able to do so effectively.

Sunlight may in the future seek to grow its business by exploring potential acquisitions or other strategic investments or alliances. Sunlight may not be successful in identifying businesses or opportunities that meet its acquisition or expansion criteria. In addition, even if a potential acquisition target or other strategic investment is identified, Sunlight may not be successful in completing such acquisition or integrating such new business or other investment in a way that allows Sunlight to realize the full benefits

TABLE OF CONTENTS

from such acquisition. Sunlight may face significant competition for acquisition and other strategic investment opportunities from other well-capitalized companies, many of which have greater financial resources and greater access to debt and equity capital to secure and complete acquisitions or other strategic investments, than Sunlight does. As a result of such competition, Sunlight may be unable to acquire certain assets or businesses, or take advantage of other strategic investment opportunities that Sunlight deems attractive; the purchase price for a given strategic opportunity may be significantly elevated; or certain other terms or circumstances may be substantially more onerous. Any delay or failure on Sunlight’s part to identify, negotiate, finance on favorable terms, consummate and integrate any such acquisition, or other strategic investment, opportunity could impede Sunlight’s growth.

Even if Sunlight completes future acquisitions, it may not ultimately strengthen its competitive position or achieve its goals and business strategy; Sunlight may be subject to claims or liabilities assumed from an acquired company, product, or technology; acquisitions Sunlight completes could be viewed negatively by its customers, investors, and securities analysts; and Sunlight may incur costs and expenses necessary to address an acquired company’s failure to comply with laws and governmental rules and regulations. Additionally, Sunlight may be subject to litigation or other claims in connection with the acquired company, including claims from terminated employees, former stockholders or other third parties, which may differ from or be more significant than the risks Sunlight’s business faces. If Sunlight is unsuccessful at integrating future acquisitions in a timely manner, or the technologies and operations associated with such acquisitions, the revenue and operating results of the combined company could be adversely affected. Any integration process may require significant time and resources, which may disrupt Sunlight’s ongoing business and divert management’s attention, and Sunlight may not be able to manage the integration process successfully or in a timely manner. Sunlight may not successfully evaluate or utilize the acquired technology or personnel, realize anticipated synergies from the acquisition, or accurately forecast the financial impact of an acquisition transaction and integration of such acquisition, including accounting charges and any potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets recognized in connection with such acquisitions. Sunlight may have to pay cash, incur debt, or issue equity or equity-linked securities to pay for any future acquisitions, each of which could adversely affect its financial condition or the market price of its Class A Common Stock. Furthermore, the sale of equity or issuance of equity-linked debt to finance any future acquisitions could result in dilution to Sunlight’s stockholders. The occurrence of any of these risks could harm Sunlight’s business, operating results, and financial condition.

Sunlight’s insurance for certain indemnity obligations to its officers and directors may be inadequate, and potential claims could materially and negatively impact Sunlight’s financial condition and results of operations.

Pursuant to Sunlight’s Certificate of Formation, the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement and certain indemnification agreements, among various other agreements, Sunlight indemnifies its officers and directors for certain liabilities that may arise in the course of their service to Sunlight. Although Sunlight currently maintains director and officer liability insurance for certain potential third-party claims for which it is legally or financially unable to indemnify them, such insurance may be inadequate to cover certain claims, or may prove prohibitively costly to maintain in the future. If Sunlight were required to pay a significant amount on account of such liabilities, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed.

Risks Related to the Solar Energy Generation Industry

Decreases in the retail price of electricity from electric utilities, from other retail electricity providers or other sources of energy, currently existing or as may be developed, including other renewable energy sources, as compared to the potential price of purchasing a solar system using solar system loan financing, could make solar systems less economically attractive to consumers. Reductions in consumer costs associated with traditional or other sources of power may stem from an increase in availability due to an increase in

TABLE OF CONTENTS

generation of such power sources, a legislated reduction in rates or special programs offered to consumers among other potential industry shifts.

Similarly, an increase in pricing associated with purchasing a solar system financed with a loan as compared to the cost to consumers of other power sources, or the cost to consumers of using a solar system pursuant to solar power purchase agreements or leases, could reduce demand for solar systems. Sunlight’s business has benefited from the declining cost of solar system components, which has been a key driver in consumer adoption of solar systems. To the extent such costs stabilize, decline at a slower rate or increase, Sunlight’s future growth may be negatively impacted. An increase in cost to the consumer purchasing a solar system financed by a loan could be as a result of, among others:

•

a decline in raw materials available to manufacture the various components of solar systems;

•

an increase in tariff penalties or duties on components of solar systems imported from other countries, which could also increase the pricing of components produced domestically associated with an increase in demand for such components;

•

the expiration or unavailability of, or adverse changes in, economic or governmental incentives, including those in the form of tax credits, grants or similar programs, which may expire on a particular date, end when the allocated funding is exhausted, or be reduced or terminated as a matter of regulatory or legislative policy, or other factors that have the impact of decreasing the ultimate price of purchasing or using a solar system to the consumer;

•

a shortage of skilled labor to install solar systems, which could have the impact of increasing demand on existing skilled labor and increasing the cost of installation of solar systems;

•

an increase in costs associated with contractor infrastructure, including as related to the potential for additional regulation, lawsuits or other unforeseen developments; and

•

an increase in interest rates that Sunlight’s capital providers charge consumers for financing solar systems.

A decrease in the price of traditional power sources or other renewable energy sources that make such sources cost less to the consumer than the purchase of a solar system with loan financing or an increase in prices to purchase a solar system with loan financing could decrease the attractiveness of the purchase and installation of such systems by consumers, which in turn may slow Sunlight’s growth and have an adverse impact on its business and results of operations.

The solar system loan industry and the home improvement industry are subject to seasonality and other industry factors that may cause Sunlight’s operating results and its ability to grow to fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year. These fluctuations may cause Sunlight’s future performance to be difficult to predict and cause its operating results for a particular period to fall below expectations.

Sunlight’s quarterly and annual operating results are subject to seasonality and other factors that make them difficult to predict and may fluctuate significantly in the future. Sunlight has experienced seasonal and quarterly fluctuations in the past and expects to experience such fluctuations in the future. Credit applications generally peak for a given year during the summer and are at their lowest point toward the end of the year. Because of the lag between credit applications and installation, fundings generally peak toward the end of the year and are at their lowest point during the spring. In addition to the other risks described herein, the following factors could cause Sunlight’s operating results to fluctuate:

•

expiration or initiation of any governmental rebates or incentives;

•

significant fluctuations in consumer demand for solar systems and/or home improvements;

•

Sunlight’s contractors’ ability to complete installations of solar systems and/or home improvements in a timely manner;

•

financial market fluctuations that may impact the availability of desirable solar system and/or home improvement loan products for consumers or increase the cost of capital to Sunlight, thereby decreasing Sunlight’s margins;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

actual or anticipated developments in Sunlight’s competitors’ businesses, technology, loan products, pricing or other initiatives relevant to the solar system or home improvement lending competitive landscape;

•

natural disasters or other weather or meteorological conditions impacting solar system or home improvement industries; and

•

general economic downturns, which could negatively impact the availability of, or cost of, capital, including in response to rising delinquencies and defaults in the market, thereby making it more difficult for Sunlight to originate loans or to do so on economic terms that are favorable to Sunlight.

For these or other reasons, the results of any prior quarterly or annual periods should not be relied upon as indications of Sunlight’s future performance.

Because Sunlight’s business is heavily concentrated on consumer lending in the U.S. solar system and home improvement industries, Sunlight’s results are more susceptible to fluctuations in those markets than a more diversified company would be.

Sunlight’s business is currently concentrated on supporting consumer lending in the U.S. solar system and home improvement industries. As a result, Sunlight is more susceptible to fluctuations and risks particular to U.S. consumer credit than a more diversified company would be, and more specifically as to factors that may drive the demand for solar systems and home improvements. Sunlight’s business concentration could have an adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.

The industries that Sunlight operates in are highly competitive and are likely to become more competitive. Additionally, if new entrants join these markets who have ready access to cheaper capital, competing successfully would become more difficult for Sunlight. Sunlight’s inability to compete successfully or maintain or improve Sunlight’s market share and margins could adversely affect its business.

The consumer lending industry is highly competitive and increasingly dynamic as emerging technologies continue to enter the marketplace. Technological advances and heightened e-commerce activities have increased consumers’ accessibility to products and services, which has intensified the desirability of offering loans to consumers through digital-based solutions. Sunlight faces competition in areas such as financing terms, promotional offerings, fees, approval rates, speed and simplicity of loan origination, ease-of-use, marketing expertise, service levels, products and services, technological capabilities and integration, customer service and support, compliance capabilities, brand and reputation. Sunlight’s existing and potential competitors may decide to modify their pricing and business models to compete more directly with Sunlight’s model or offer similar promotions and ancillary services. If Sunlight is unable to compete effectively to attract contractors to sell Sunlight loans to their consumer customers, Sunlight’s results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Sunlight’s success in the solar systems point of sale lending industry is in part due to Sunlight’s low cost of capital. While the barriers to entry in this business are high, if new entrants with access to cheaper capital enter the market, such as a depository institution, competing could become more difficult for Sunlight. A new market entrant with a lower cost of capital could discount pricing to a level below which Sunlight would be able to match and maintain its margins or such entrant could maintain pricing but make more revenue on each loan. Sunlight’s inability to compete successfully with these tactics by lowering its own cost of capital or competing on other terms that are valuable to solar systems contractors such as user-friendly, best-in-market technology or by providing valuable ancillary services, could materially negatively impact Sunlight’s business.

Risks Related to Sunlight’s Technology and Intellectual Property

Developments in technology or improvements in the solar energy generation industry, including energy storage and distributed solar power, may adversely affect demand for Sunlight’s loans.

Significant developments in technology, such as advances in distributed solar power generation, energy storage solutions such as batteries, energy storage management systems, the widespread use or adoption of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

fuel cells for residential properties or improvements in other forms of distributed or centralized power production may materially and adversely affect demand for solar systems and, in turn, the demand for loans originated through Sunlight’s Platform, which may negatively impact Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Additionally, recent technological advancements may impact Sunlight’s business in ways Sunlight does not currently anticipate. Any failure by Sunlight to adopt or have access to assist consumers to finance new or enhanced technologies or processes, or to react to changes in existing technologies, could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Cyber-attacks and other security breaches could have an adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.

In the normal course of Sunlight’s business, Sunlight collects, processes and retains sensitive and nonpublic personal consumer information. Although Sunlight devotes significant resources and management focus to ensuring the integrity of its systems through information security and business continuity programs, Sunlight’s facilities and information technology systems, and those of capital providers, contractors and third-party service providers, may be subjected to external or internal security breaches and cyber-attacks, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming or human errors and other similar events that result in the disclosure of sensitive and confidential information. Sunlight also faces security threats from malicious third parties that could attempt to obtain unauthorized access to Sunlight systems and networks, which threats have increased significantly in recent years and which Sunlight anticipates will continue to grow in scope and complexity over time. These events could interrupt Sunlight’s business and/or operations, result in significant legal and financial exposure, supervisory liability, other government or regulatory fines and penalties, damage to its reputation and a loss of confidence in the security of Sunlight’s systems and ability to facilitate the origination of loans. Although Sunlight has not experienced such adverse events to date, no assurance can be given that these events will not have a material adverse effect on Sunlight in the future.

Information security risks in the financial services industry have increased recently, in part because of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions and the increased sophistication and activities of organized criminals, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, terrorists and others. In addition to cyber-attacks and other security breaches involving the theft of sensitive and confidential information, hackers recently have engaged in attacks that are designed to disrupt key business services, such as consumer-facing websites. Sunlight, contractors, capital providers and vendors may not be able to anticipate or implement effective preventive measures against all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently and because attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources. Sunlight employs detection and response mechanisms designed to contain and mitigate security incidents. Nonetheless, early detection efforts may be thwarted by sophisticated attacks and malware designed to avoid detection. Sunlight also may fail to detect the existence of a security breach related to the information of capital providers, contractors and consumers that Sunlight retains as part of its business and may be unable to prevent unauthorized access to that information.

Sunlight also faces risks related to cyber-attacks and other security breaches that typically involve the transmission of sensitive information regarding borrowers through various third parties, including Sunlight’s various service providers engaged to support Sunlight’s underwriting and other technological and operational processes. Because Sunlight does not control these third parties or oversee the security of their systems, future security breaches or cyber-attacks affecting any of these third parties could impact Sunlight through no fault of its own, and in some cases Sunlight may have exposure and suffer losses for breaches or attacks relating to them. While Sunlight regularly conducts security assessments of significant third-party service providers, no assurance is given that Sunlight’s third-party information security protocols are sufficient to prevent a service provider from experiencing a cyber-attack or other security breach.

Disruptions in the operation of Sunlight’s computer systems and those of its critical third-party service providers and capital providers could have an adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.

Sunlight’s ability to facilitate the origination of loans and otherwise operate Sunlight’s business and comply with applicable laws depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of Sunlight’s computer

TABLE OF CONTENTS

systems and critical third-party service providers that support these processes. These Sunlight or third-party computer systems may encounter service interruptions at any time due to system or software failure, natural disasters, severe weather conditions, health pandemics, terrorist attacks, cyber-attacks or other events. Any of such catastrophes could have a negative effect on Sunlight’s business and technology infrastructure (including its computer network systems). Catastrophic events could also impact public agencies that provide permitting or other related services and prevent or make it more difficult for contractors to install solar systems, and could interrupt or disable local or national communications networks, including payment networks and capital provider’s ability to fund loans. All of these adverse effects of catastrophic events could result in an inability for Sunlight to meet its funding obligations with respect to existing loan applications or for Sunlight to originate new loans, which could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.

In addition, the implementation of technology changes and upgrades to maintain current and integrate new systems may cause service interruptions, transaction processing errors or system conversion delays and may cause Sunlight to fail to comply in a timely manner with its agreements with applicable laws, all of which could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business. Sunlight expects that new technologies and business processes applicable to the point of sale consumer loan industry will continue to emerge. There can be no assurance that Sunlight will be able to successfully adopt new technology as critical systems and applications become obsolete and better systems, applications and processes become available. A failure to maintain or improve current technology and business processes could cause disruptions in Sunlight’s operations or cause its solution to be less competitive, all of which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.

The market for electric generation products is heavily influenced by federal, state, and local government laws, regulations, and policies concerning the electric utility industry in the United States and abroad, as well as policies promulgated by electric utilities. These regulations and policies often relate to electricity pricing and technical interconnection of customer-owned electricity generation, and changes that make solar power less competitive with other power sources could deter investment in the research and development of alternative energy sources as well as customer purchases of solar power technology from Sunlight’s network of contractors, which could in turn result in a significant reduction in the demand for Sunlight’s solar power loan products. The market for electric generation equipment is also influenced by trade and local content laws, regulations, and policies that can discourage growth and competition in the solar industry and create economic barriers to the purchase of solar power products, thus reducing demand for solar products sold by our contractor partners, and in turn our solar power loan products. In addition, on-grid applications depend on access to the grid, which is also regulated by government entities. We anticipate that solar power products and their installation will continue to be subject to oversight and regulation in accordance with federal, state, local, and foreign regulations relating to construction, safety, environmental protection, utility interconnection and metering, trade, and related matters. It is difficult to track the requirements of individual states or local jurisdictions and design equipment to comply with the varying standards. Any new regulations or policies pertaining to solar power products may result in significant additional expenses to contractor partners and their customers, which could cause a significant reduction in demand for Sunlight’s loan products. See also under this section, “Risks Related to Legal Matters and Sunlight’s Regulatory Environment — The highly regulated environment in which Sunlight’s capital providers operate could have an adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.”

Sunlight may be unable to sufficiently protect its proprietary rights, trade secrets and intellectual property, and may encounter disputes from time to time relating to its use of the intellectual property of third parties.

Sunlight relies on a combination of patents, trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade secrets, domain names and agreements with employees and third parties to protect its proprietary rights. Unauthorized third parties may attempt to duplicate or copy the proprietary aspects of its technology and processes. Sunlight’s competitors and other third parties independently may design around or develop similar technology or otherwise duplicate Sunlight’s services or products. In addition, though Sunlight has restrictive covenant

TABLE OF CONTENTS

agreements in place that are intended to protect its intellectual property, trade secrets and confidential and proprietary information (“Proprietary Information”) or provide a remedy in the event of an unauthorized disclosure, these agreements may not prevent misappropriation of Sunlight’s Proprietary Information or infringement of Sunlight’s intellectual property and the resulting loss of competitive advantage, and Sunlight may be required to litigate to protect its intellectual property and Proprietary Information from misappropriation or infringement by others, which may be expensive, could cause a diversion of resources and may not be successful.

Sunlight also may encounter disputes from time to time concerning intellectual property rights of others, and it may not prevail in these disputes. Third parties may raise claims against Sunlight alleging that Sunlight, or consultants or other third parties retained or indemnified by Sunlight, infringe on their intellectual property rights. Some third-party intellectual property rights may be extremely broad, and it may not be possible for Sunlight to conduct its operations in such a way as to avoid all alleged violations of such intellectual property rights. Given the complex, rapidly changing and competitive technological and business environment in which Sunlight operates, and the potential risks and uncertainties of intellectual property-related litigation, an assertion of an infringement claim against Sunlight may cause Sunlight to spend significant amounts to defend the claim, even if Sunlight ultimately prevails. If Sunlight does not prevail, Sunlight may be required to pay significant money damages, suffer losses of significant revenues, be prohibited from using the relevant systems, processes, technologies or other intellectual property (temporarily or permanently), be required to cease offering certain products or services, or incur significant license, royalty or technology development expenses.

In addition, although in some cases a third party may have agreed to indemnify Sunlight for such costs, such indemnifying party may refuse or be unable to uphold its contractual obligations. In other cases, insurance may not cover potential claims of this type adequately or at all, and Sunlight may be required to pay monetary damages, which may be significant.

Some aspects of the Sunlight Platform and processes include open source software, and any failure to comply with the terms of one or more of these open source licenses could negatively affect its business.

Aspects of the Sunlight Platform include software covered by open source licenses. The terms of various open source licenses have not been interpreted by United States courts, and such licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on Sunlight’s Platform. If portions of Sunlight’s proprietary software are determined to be subject to an open source license, Sunlight could be required to publicly release the affected portions of source code, re-engineer all or a portion of its technologies or otherwise be limited in the licensing of technologies, each of which could reduce or eliminate the value of Sunlight’s technologies. In addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software because open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on the origin of the software. Many of the risks associated with the use of open source software cannot be eliminated and could adversely affect Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Contractor and Capital Provider-Related Risks

Sunlight’s growth is dependent on its contractor network and in turn the quality of the products and services they provide to their customers, and Sunlight’s failure to retain or replace existing contractors, to grow its contractor network or the number of Sunlight loans offered through its existing network, or increases in loan delinquencies due to any deficiencies in Sunlight’s contractor underwriting practices, could adversely impact Sunlight’s business.

Solar system and home improvement loans are offered through Sunlight to Sunlight’s contractor networks to such contractors’ consumer customers who buy solar systems or home improvements. In order to continue to grow, Sunlight will need to further expand its contractor networks. Sunlight is subject to significant competition for the recruitment and retention of contractors from its current competitors and new entrants to the solar system loan and home improvement loan markets, and Sunlight may not be able to recruit new or replacement contractors in the future, or expand its loan volume with existing contractors, at a rate required to produce projected growth. Sunlight competes for contractors with solar system and home

TABLE OF CONTENTS

improvement lenders primarily based on scope of loan product offerings that respond to consumer demand, pricing to the contractors (“OID”), user friendliness of Sunlight’s technology (Orange®) and other processes to make the loan sale process efficient and individualized in service and responsiveness. Sunlight does not have any exclusivity agreements with its contractors. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that Sunlight will be able to maintain its current contractor relationships. Sunlight may lose existing contractors that represent a significant portion of Sunlight’s business, and there is no guarantee that Sunlight would be able to engage replacement contractors on terms similar to its existing contractors, or at all.

Additionally, dependence on any one contractor or small group of contractors creates concentration risk, particularly in the event that any such contractor elects to terminate its relationship with Sunlight, experiences business disruption, a business failure or bankruptcy, or fails to supply, or perform the installation of, the solar system or home improvement product to the satisfaction of the customer, which may result in potential loan defaults which could have a material adverse impact on Sunlight’s results of operations. For example, during May 2021, Sunlight was advised by a significant contractor that it will discontinue use of the Sunlight’s platform to source solar loans effective immediately. This contractor accounted for approximately 6.7% and 11.1% of Sunlight’s total funded loan volumes during the year ended December 31, 2020 and for the six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2020, Sunlight’s top ten contractors accounted for approximately 74%, 46% and 42% of the total funded loan volumes for such periods, respectively. In the period from June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020, the top ten contractors in Sunlight’s network were responsible for selling 44.0% of Sunlight’s funded loan volume, and in the period from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021 that percentage decreased to 43.9%.

Sunlight’s short-term capital advance program exposes it to potential losses in the event that a contractor fails to fully perform under its agreements with Sunlight or becomes insolvent prior to completion of the underlying installation or construction, which losses could have an adverse impact on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Sunlight maintains a short-term capital advance program with certain contractors that provides such contractors with up-front working capital to pay for certain expenses for installation or the construction of solar systems and home improvements. Such short-term capital advances may be paid to contractors prior to the commencement of such installation or construction, or at specified periods during the installation or construction process. The aggregate amount of advances available to a given contractor is based on a risk evaluation and tiering conducted by Sunlight’s commercial risk team that performs contractor underwriting generally, as well as additional oversight and periodic monitoring requirements. At any time prior to completion of installation or construction of solar systems or home improvements, Sunlight is at risk for defaults if a contractor to whom short-term advances have been made fails to fully perform under its agreements with Sunlight or becomes insolvent prior to the completion of installation or construction. The ability of contractors to fully perform or maintain their solvency depends on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in economic conditions, adverse trends or events affecting the solar system and home improvement industries, lack of availability of, and/or access to, as well as increases in the cost of, materials or labor for the installation or construction of solar systems or home improvements, due to global supply chain shortages and the increase in competition for skilled labor, natural disasters and management and cash flow levels. As of December 31, 2020, Sunlight had an aggregate of $35.4 million of outstanding advances to 141 contractors. Approximately 60.1% of those advances were made to four of Sunlight’s largest contractor relationships in terms of funded loan volume. As of June 30, 2021, Sunlight had an aggregate of $41.0 million of outstanding advances to 135 contractors. Approximately 67.5% of those advances were made to five of Sunlight’s largest contractor relationships in terms of funded loan volume. In the event that one or more contractors who receive short-term capital advances are unable to fully perform under their agreements with Sunlight or maintain their solvency, Sunlight may lose a portion or all of the funds advanced to such contractor, which may have an adverse impact on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Further, Sunlight advances funding payments to contractors in order to ensure payment to its contractors within 24 hours. If a capital provider fails to reimburse Sunlight for such advances as anticipated, Sunlight may need to write-off such advances, subjecting Sunlight to consumer credit risk. Alternatively, if the contractor funded by Sunlight declares bankruptcy prior to Sunlight being reimbursed, the capital provider

TABLE OF CONTENTS

is not likely to fund the loan and reimburse Sunlight. Sunlight could be subject to losses if the consumers borrowing funds from Sunlight under these loans do not pay as and when required.

Sunlight’s rebate program with certain of its contractors may be utilized by such contractors to a greater degree in certain periods, resulting in decreased fee income from its contractor partners, which could have a material adverse impact on Sunlight’s revenues during those periods.

Sunlight offers rebates to certain of its contractor partners in exchange for volume commitments. In general, the contractors with these rebate arrangements realize a rebate on funded loans originated over an agreed period of time (for example, one year) provided that the agreed volume of funded loan origination was achieved by that contractor. Sunlight accrues for such rebates on a quarterly basis based on the estimated amount of the rebate, but the accrual may be less than the actual rebate earned by a contractor or contractors when the rebate is required to be paid if volume is higher than anticipated in certain periods. If that occurs, Sunlight may be required to record a charge for rebates that is larger than would be the case if its accrual matched the rebates actually earned. If such a charge occurs, Sunlight’s revenues for the applicable quarterly period may be adversely impacted. For example, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, rebates to contractor partners totaled approximately $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in excess of the estimated amounts accrued therefor, which directly reduced fee income received by Sunlight for loans originated by contractors on Sunlight’s platform during those periods and resulted in a decrease in aggregate revenue to Sunlight.

Loans originated through Sunlight’s technology platform (Orange®) are originated by third-party capital providers. As Sunlight continues to grow, Sunlight will need to either expand the commitments of its existing capital providers or find additional capital providers to fund additional volume. Sunlight’s inability to identify capital provider sources for new loan volume or to replace loan volume funding capacity should a capital provider elect to terminate its relationship with Sunlight could have a material adverse impact on Sunlight’s growth.

Sunlight relies on third-party capital providers to originate solar system and home improvement loans through Sunlight’s Platform to third party borrowers. As Sunlight’s business grows, Sunlight will need additional funding sources for those loans to third party borrowers, either from its existing capital providers or by entering into program funding agreements with new capital providers. Sunlight’s failure to obtain additional funding commitments in an amount needed to fund its projected loan volume, or Sunlight’s failure to extend its existing commitments or identify new capital providers on economic terms similar to or better than what Sunlight currently has with its existing capital providers, could have a material adverse impact on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Additionally, Sunlight’s funding program agreements generally have automatic renewal provisions, but Sunlight cannot predict whether a capital provider will elect to terminate their commitment in the future. Many factors may influence the ability or willingness of Sunlight’s existing capital providers to renew their annual capital commitments and the terms on which such renewals are made, including, but not limited to, changes in economic conditions, including credit markets and interest rates, adverse trends or events affecting the lending industry or industries that Sunlight serves, changes in strategy by capital providers, the overall attractiveness of the returns that may be realized from solar system or home improvement loans by capital providers from their relationship with Sunlight, Sunlight’s performance and the performance of loans originated through Sunlight’s Platform and changes in legislation and regulations that affect Sunlight or capital providers. Sunlight cannot predict its third-party capital providers’ appetite to continue originating solar system or home improvement loans or other risks to such parties businesses that could cause any such party to not renew their loan funding program with Sunlight.

In addition, Sunlight’s funding program agreements contain covenants and agreements relating to the origination of loans on such providers’ balance sheets. If Sunlight materially breaches these conditions and fails to cure them in the time allotted, the relevant capital provider may terminate its relationship with Sunlight. Such covenants and agreements generally include, among others, obligations related to funding volumes, concentration limits on certain loan products, FICO score requirements, agreements related to Sunlight’s legal compliance in the origination process, underwriting requirements, milestone payment requirements and data privacy requirements. If Sunlight were to breach one or more of the covenants and the relevant existing capital provider elects to terminate its relationship with Sunlight and Sunlight is unable to procure alternative

TABLE OF CONTENTS

agreements with new capital providers or increase commitments from other existing capital providers in a timely manner and on acceptable terms, or at all, Sunlight’s results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Dependence by Sunlight on one capital provider or a group of similarly situated capital providers that would be impacted similarly by market factors subjects Sunlight to concentration risk. In 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively, one capital provider, Technology Credit Union, funded 53.2%, 48.9% and 47.4% of Sunlight’s funded solar system loan volume. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, Technology Credit Union funded 32.4% and 35.9% of Sunlight’s funded solar system loan volume, respectively. Also, although in separate geographical jurisdictions, in those same years, 63.7%, 73.9% and 84.3%, respectively, of Sunlight’s total solar system loan volume was funded by credit unions, which could have similar market, regulatory or other risks that could simultaneously impact their ability to continue to originate solar system loans through Sunlight. Sunlight’s continued growth could be materially and adversely affected if this or any other of its capital providers or a group of them were not able to or determined not to continue to fund solar loans facilitated by Sunlight, and Sunlight was not able to attract additional capital providers to replace that funding capacity. Capital providers could determine to stop funding solar loans for different reasons that are outside of Sunlight’s control such as a desire to diversify their own asset bases, changes in the market or regulatory requirements or other circumstances.

Sunlight is subject to regular audits by its capital providers and their regulators, as well as certain other parties closely involved in Sunlight’s processes, such as credit bureaus. If Sunlight does not “pass” these audits, Sunlight could suffer reputational damage that will make it more difficult to engage capital providers or extend its current relationships on positive economic terms to Sunlight, which could negatively impact Sunlight’s business and financial condition.

Sunlight is subject to regular audits by its capital providers and their regulators, as well as certain other parties closely involved in Sunlight’s processes, such as credit bureaus. These audits are broad and include reviews of Sunlight’s consumer protection law policies and procedures, privacy practices, information technology security measures, human resources practices and other areas of operation. If Sunlight does not “pass” these audits or Sunlight’s performance is deemed weak or significant deficiencies are identified, Sunlight could suffer reputational damage. Sunlight’s existing capital providers may be less willing to extend the terms of their existing agreements or may elect to increase the cost of capital to Sunlight if it perceives these issues as increasing their risk. These issues may also make it more difficult for Sunlight to engage new capital providers on positive economic terms to Sunlight. Further, if third parties critical to Sunlight’s operations should find Sunlight’s audit results concerning, they may not be willing to continue to partner with Sunlight. If these critical parties are not willing to continue to partner with Sunlight, Sunlight may need to alter its operations in a manner that has a negative impact on its business or Sunlight may experience business disruption while it seeks to find a replacement vendor (which, if identified, may not be available to Sunlight on positive economic terms) that could negatively impact Sunlight’s business and financial condition.

Contractor and marketplace confidence in Sunlight’s liquidity and long-term business prospects is important for building and maintaining Sunlight’s business. Additionally, if Sunlight experiences negative publicity, it may lose the confidence of its funding providers, capital providers and contractors and Sunlight’s business may suffer.

Sunlight’s financial condition, operating results and business prospects may suffer materially if it is unable to establish and maintain confidence about its liquidity and long-term business prospects among contractors, consumers and within Sunlight’s industry. Sunlight’s contractor network is Sunlight’s distribution channel for the loans originated through Orange® and therefore serves as the means by which Sunlight is able to rapidly and successfully expand within existing and prospective markets. Contractors and other third parties will be less likely to enter into agreements with Sunlight if they are uncertain if Sunlight will be able to make payments on time, its business will succeed or its operations will continue for many years. Sunlight may not succeed in its efforts to build this confidence.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sunlight relies on a number of third-party service providers and vendors, and if certain of those vendors are unable or unwilling to provide their services or products, Sunlight may experience meaningful harm to its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Sunlight has established a process whereby it evaluates each vendor to determine if such vendor is “critical” to Sunlight’s business. Sunlight defines “critical” as a vendor that, if unwilling or unable to provide its services or products to Sunlight for seven days, would potentially cause Sunlight to experience material harm to its business. Sunlight currently has 18 vendors qualified as critical. Most of these critical vendors relate to services provided to support Orange® and other related technology. No assurance can be given that any vendor critical to Sunlight’s business will not experience a prolonged business or system disruption, financial difficulties, including potential bankruptcy, or other circumstances that could cause such vendor to be unable to perform under its contract with Sunlight. Further, Sunlight cannot predict whether any critical vendor would choose to breach an agreement or not renew a contract in an effort to increase pricing or otherwise that a dispute will not occur between Sunlight and a critical vendor. If any of these events do occur, Sunlight will need to find a replacement and integrate such replacement vendor quickly. If Sunlight cannot locate an adequate replacement or cannot integrate the replacement vendor services quickly, Sunlight may have to alter its operations or experience business disruption itself, which would likely have a material adverse impact on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Financial and Accounting-Related Risks

Sunlight’s projections are subject to significant risks, assumptions, estimates and uncertainties. As a result, Sunlight’s projected revenues, market share, expenses, profitability and any guidance it may publish from time to time may differ materially from its expectations.

Sunlight operates in a rapidly changing and competitive industries and Sunlight’s projections will be subject to the risks and assumptions made by management with respect to its industry. Operating results are difficult to forecast because they generally depend on a number of factors, including competition, Sunlight’s ability to attract and retain capital providers and contractors, general industry trends and financial market considerations. Additionally, as described under “— Sunlight’s revenue is impacted, to a significant extent, by the general economy and the financial performance of its capital providers and contractors,” Sunlight’s business may be affected by reductions in consumer spending from time to time as a result of a number of factors that may be difficult to predict, rising interest rates and a reduction of the general availability of capital to consumers. This may result in decreased revenue and Sunlight may be unable to adopt measures in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected decline. This inability could cause Sunlight’s operating results in a given quarter to be higher or lower than expected. If actual results differ from Sunlight’s estimates, analysts may negatively react and Sunlight Financial Holdings’ stock price could be materially adversely impacted.

Additionally, Sunlight may, from time to time, provide guidance regarding its future performance that represents management’s estimates as of the date such guidance is provided. Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions that inform such guidance will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. Sunlight’s ability to meet funded volume, cost, Adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow or any other forward-looking guidance is impacted by a number of factors including, but not limited to, changes in domestic and foreign business, market, financial, political and legal conditions; risks related to Sunlight’s business and the timing of expected business milestones or results; the effects of competition and regulatory risks, and the impacts of changes in legislation or regulations on Sunlight’s future business; the expiration, renewal, modification or replacement of the federal solar investment tax credit; the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on Sunlight’s business or future results; and Sunlight’s ability to issue equity or equity-linked securities. Accordingly, Sunlight’s guidance is only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of the date such guidance is provided. Actual results may vary from such guidance and the variations may be material.

Sunlight’s revenue is impacted, to a significant extent, by the general economy and the financial performance of its capital providers and contractors.

Sunlight’s business, the consumer financial services industry, its contractors’ and its capital providers’ businesses are sensitive to macroeconomic conditions. Economic factors such as interest rates, changes in

TABLE OF CONTENTS

monetary and related policies, market volatility, consumer confidence and unemployment rates are among the most significant factors that impact consumer spending behavior. Weak economic conditions or a significant deterioration in economic conditions reduce the amount of disposable income consumers have, which in turn reduces consumer spending and the willingness of qualified borrowers to take out loans. Such conditions are also likely to affect the ability and willingness of borrowers to pay amounts owed to Sunlight or its capital providers, each of which would have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.

General economic conditions and the willingness of its capital providers to deploy capital in the consumer industries within which Sunlight operates impacts Sunlight’s performance. The origination of new loans through Orange®, and the platform fees and other fee income to Sunlight associated with such loans, is dependent upon sales and installations of solar systems and home improvements. Contractors’ sales may decrease or fail to increase as a result of factors outside of their control, such as the macroeconomic conditions referenced above, business conditions affecting an industry vertical or region, changing regulatory environments, delays in permitting and/or permission to operate of residential solar. Weak economic conditions also could extend the length of contractors’ sales cycle and cause prospective borrowers to delay making (or not make) purchases of solar systems or home improvements. The decline of sales by contractors for any reason will generally result in reduced loan volume and associated fee income for Sunlight and its capital providers, which may materially adversely affect Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, if a contractor or capital provider becomes subject to a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy proceeding (or if there is a perception that it may become subject to a bankruptcy proceeding), borrowers may have less incentive to pay their outstanding balances to Sunlight or its capital providers, which could result in higher charge-off rates than anticipated. Any consistent or system failures of Sunlight’s contractors or capital providers could materially adversely affect Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

If assumptions or estimates Sunlight uses in preparing its financial statements are incorrect or are required to change, Sunlight’s reported results of operations, liquidity and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Sunlight is required to make various assumptions and estimates in preparing its financial statements under GAAP, including for purposes of determining finance charge reversals, share-based compensation, asset impairment, reserves related to litigation and other legal matters, and other regulatory exposures and the amounts recorded for certain contractual payments to be paid to, or received from, Sunlight’s counterparties and others under contractual arrangements. In addition, significant assumptions and estimates are involved in determining certain disclosures required under GAAP, including those involving fair value measurements. If the assumptions or estimates underlying Sunlight’s financial statements are incorrect, the actual amounts realized on transactions and balances subject to those estimates will be different, which could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.

Future changes in financial accounting standards may significantly change Sunlight’s reported results of operations.

GAAP is subject to standard setting or interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the PCAOB, the SEC and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on Sunlight’s reported financial results and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change.

Additionally, Sunlight’s assumptions, estimates and judgments related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect its financial results. GAAP and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to its business, including, without limitation, revenue recognition, finance charge reversals and share-based compensation, are highly complex and involve subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by Sunlight. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments by Sunlight could require Sunlight to make changes to its accounting systems that could increase its operating costs and significantly change its reported or expected financial performance.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Risks Related to Legal Matters and Sunlight’s Regulatory Environment

Litigation, regulatory actions and compliance issues could subject Sunlight to significant fines, penalties, judgments, remediation costs, indemnification obligations and/or other requirements resulting in increased expenses and negatively impacting Sunlight’s liquidity and financial condition.

Sunlight’s business is subject to increased risks of litigation and regulatory actions as a result of a number of factors and from various sources, including as a result of the highly regulated nature of the consumer financial services industry and the focus of state and federal enforcement agencies on the financial services industry.

Federal and state agencies have broad enforcement powers over Sunlight, including powers to investigate Sunlight’s business practices and broad discretion to deem particular practices unfair, deceptive, abusive or otherwise not in accordance with the law. The continued focus of regulators on the consumer financial services industry has resulted, and could continue to result, in new enforcement actions that could, directly or indirectly, affect the manner in which Sunlight conducts its business and increase the costs of defending and settling any such matters, which could negatively impact its business. In some cases, regardless of fault, it may be less time-consuming or costly to settle these matters, which may require Sunlight to implement certain changes to its business practices, provide remediation to certain individuals or make a settlement payment to a given party or regulatory body. There is no assurance that any future settlements will not have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.

From time to time, Sunlight may be involved in, or the subject of, reviews, requests for information, examinations, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by state and federal governmental agencies regarding Sunlight’s business activities and Sunlight’s qualifications to conduct its business in certain jurisdictions, which could subject Sunlight to significant fines, penalties, obligations to change its business practices, capital provider, contractor and consumer remediations, increased compliance costs and other requirements resulting in increased expenses and diminished earnings. Sunlight’s involvement in any such matter also could cause significant harm to its reputation and divert management attention from the operation of its business, even if the matters are ultimately determined in Sunlight’s favor. Moreover, any settlement, or any consent order or adverse judgment in connection with any formal or informal proceeding or investigation by a government agency, may prompt litigation or additional investigations or proceedings as other litigants or other government agencies begin independent reviews of the same activities.

In addition, a number of participants in the consumer finance industry have been the subject of putative class action lawsuits; state attorney general actions and other state regulatory actions; federal regulatory enforcement actions, including actions relating to alleged unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices; violations of state licensing and lending laws, including state usury laws; actions alleging discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender or other prohibited bases; and allegations of noncompliance with various state and federal laws and regulations relating to originating and servicing consumer finance loans. The current regulatory environment, increased regulatory compliance requirements and enhanced regulatory enforcement could result in significant operational and compliance costs and may prevent Sunlight from offering certain products and services. There is no assurance that these regulatory matters or other factors will not, in the future, affect how Sunlight conducts its business and, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business or results of operations. In particular, legal proceedings brought under state consumer protection statutes or under several of the various federal consumer financial services statutes may result in a separate fine for each violation of the statute, which, particularly in the case of class action lawsuits, could result in damages substantially in excess of the amounts Sunlight earned from the underlying activities.

In addition, from time to time, through Sunlight’s operational and compliance controls, Sunlight identifies compliance issues that require it to make operational changes and, depending on the nature of the issue and contractual obligations to its various capital providers, result in financial remediation to impacted capital providers or consumers. These self-identified issues and voluntary remediation payments could be significant, depending on the issue and the number of capital providers, contractors or consumers impacted, and also could generate litigation or regulatory investigations that subject Sunlight to additional risk.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sunlight is subject to federal and state consumer protection laws.

In connection with the origination of loans, Sunlight must comply with various state and federal regulatory regimes, including those applicable to consumer credit transactions, various aspects of which are untested as applied to Sunlight’s business model. The complex regulatory environment of the consumer credit industry are subject to constant change and modification. While changes to statutes and promulgating new regulations may take a substantial amount of time, issuing regulatory guidance with the force of law in the form of opinions, bulletins and notices can occur quickly. Also, consumer credit regulators often initiate inquiries into market participants, which can lead to investigations and, ultimately, enforcement actions. In addition, the laws and regulations applicable to Sunlight are subject to administrative or judicial interpretation. Some of these laws and regulations have been enacted only recently and may not yet have been interpreted or may be interpreted infrequently. As a result of infrequent or sparse interpretations, ambiguities in these laws and regulations may create uncertainty with respect to what type of conduct is permitted or restricted under such laws and regulations. Any ambiguity under a law or regulation to which Sunlight is subject may lead to regulatory investigations, governmental enforcement actions and private causes of action, such as class action lawsuits, with respect to Sunlight’s compliance with such laws or regulations. As a result, Sunlight is subject to a constantly evolving consumer finance regulatory environment that is difficult to predict and which may affect Sunlight’s business. The laws to which Sunlight directly or its services by contract are or may be subject to include, among others:

•

state laws and regulations that impose requirements related to loan disclosures and terms, credit discrimination and unfair, deceptive or abusive business acts or practices;

•

the Truth-in-Lending Act, and its implementing Regulation Z, and similar state laws, which require certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms and conditions of their loans and credit transactions;

•

Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, and Section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which prohibits unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices (“UDAAP”), in connection with any consumer financial product or service;

•

the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and its implementing Regulation B, which prohibit creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, marital status, the fact that all or part of the applicant’s income derives from any public assistance program or the fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act or any applicable state law;

•

the Fair Credit Reporting Act (the “FCRA”), and its implementing Regulation V, as amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, which promotes the accuracy, fairness and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies;

•

the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and its implementing Regulation F, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, as well as state debt collection laws, all of which provide guidelines and limitations concerning the conduct of debt collectors in connection with the collection of consumer debts;

•

the Bankruptcy Code, which limits the extent to which creditors may seek to enforce debts against parties who have filed for bankruptcy protection;

•

the California Consumer Privacy Act, which includes certain limitations on the disclosure of nonpublic personal information by financial institutions about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties, in certain circumstances requires financial institutions to limit the use and further disclosure of nonpublic personal information by nonaffiliated third parties to whom they disclose such information and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal consumer information, and other privacy laws and regulations;

•

the Gramm Leach Bliley Act, and its implementing Regulation P, which requires financial institutions to disclose certain information to consumers about the privacy and use of their data and which imposes certain data security requirements on financial institutions;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

the rules and regulations promulgated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, as well as state banking regulators;

•

the Office of Foreign Assets Control, which publishes a list of individuals and companies owned or controlled by, or acting for or on behalf of, targeted or sanctioned countries, whose assets are blocked and Sunlight is generally prohibited from dealing with;

•

the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which allows active duty military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations, and prohibits certain creditor self-help remedies, including repossession, so that the military member can devote his or her full attention to military duties;

•

the Military Lending Act, enacted in 2006 and implemented by the Department of Defense, which imposes a 36% cap on the “all-in” annual percentage rates charged on certain loans to active-duty members of the U.S. military, reserves and National Guard and their dependents;

•

the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which provide disclosure requirements, guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts;

•

the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which restricts telephone solicitations and the use of automated phone equipment;

•

the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, which authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures; and

•

the Bank Secrecy Act, which relates to compliance with anti-money laundering, due diligence and record-keeping policies and procedures.

While Sunlight has developed policies and procedures designed to assist in compliance with these laws and regulations, no assurance is given that its compliance policies and procedures will be effective. Failure to comply with these laws and with regulatory requirements applicable to Sunlight’s business could subject it to damages, revocation of licenses, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions, civil and criminal liability, indemnification obligations to its capital providers, loan repurchase obligations and reputational damage which may harm Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

The consumer finance industry is highly regulated and subject to regular changes or evolution in those regulatory requirements. Changing federal, state and local laws, as well as changing regulatory enforcement policies and priorities, may negatively impact Sunlight’s business.

In connection with Sunlight’s financial services operations, Sunlight is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination under United States federal and state laws and regulations. Sunlight is required to comply with numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations that regulate, among other things, the manner in which Sunlight administers loans, the terms of the loans that its capital providers originate and the fees that Sunlight may charge. Any failure to comply with any of these laws or regulations could subject Sunlight to lawsuits or governmental actions or damage Sunlight’s reputation, which could materially and adversely affect Sunlight’s business. Regulators have broad discretion with respect to the interpretation, implementation and enforcement of these laws and regulations, including through enforcement actions that could subject Sunlight to civil money penalties, capital provider and consumer remediations, increased compliance costs and limits or prohibitions on Sunlight’s ability to offer certain products or services or to engage in certain activities. In addition, to the extent that Sunlight undertakes actions requiring regulatory approval or non-objection, regulators may make their approval or non-objection subject to conditions or restrictions that could have a material adverse effect on its business. Moreover, any competitors subject to different, or in some cases less restrictive, legislative or regulatory regimes may have or obtain a competitive advantage over Sunlight.

Proposals to change the statutes affecting financial services companies are frequently introduced in Congress and state legislatures that, if enacted, may affect its operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways. In addition, numerous federal and state regulators have the authority to promulgate or change regulations that could have a similar effect on Sunlight’s operating environment. Sunlight cannot

TABLE OF CONTENTS

determine with any degree of certainty whether any such legislative or regulatory proposals will be enacted and, if enacted, the ultimate impact that any such potential legislation or implementing regulations, or any such potential regulatory actions by federal or state regulators, would have upon Sunlight’s business, results of operations or financial condition.

Sunlight is also subject to potential enforcement and other actions that may be brought by state attorneys general or other state enforcement authorities and other governmental agencies. Any such actions could subject Sunlight to civil money penalties and fines, capital provider, contractor and consumer remediation, and increased compliance costs, damage its reputation and brand and limit or prohibit Sunlight’s ability to offer certain products and services or engage in certain business practices.

New laws, regulations, policy or changes in enforcement of existing laws or regulations applicable to Sunlight’s business, or reexamination of current practices, could adversely impact Sunlight’s profitability, limit its ability to continue existing or pursue new business activities, require it to change certain of its business practices or alter its relationships with contractors or capital providers, affect retention of key personnel, including management, or expose Sunlight to additional costs (including increased compliance costs and/or capital provider, contractor or consumer remediation). These changes also may require Sunlight to invest significant resources, and devote significant management attention, to make any necessary changes and could adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Sunlight’s “business to business to consumer” business model subjects Sunlight and its capital providers to potential regulatory risk and litigation based on the sales practices employed by the various contractors in Sunlight’s networks.

Loan products offered by Sunlight through Orange® are offered to the consumer customers of the various contractors in Sunlight’s contractor networks by sales people employed by or engaged as third-party service providers of such contractors. Sales of consumer loans are regulated by various federal, state and local regulators. From time to time, Sunlight and its capital providers have been included in lawsuits brought by the consumer customers of certain contractors in Sunlight’s networks citing claims based on the sales practices of these contractors. Sunlight does not view contractors in its networks as its agents for whose actions Sunlight would potentially have vicarious liability. Sunlight has processes to provide educational support to these contractors and a robust process to detect any contractor sales practices that may violate applicable law and Sunlight obtains indemnities for such claims in the program agreements between Sunlight and the contractors with whom Sunlight partners. While Sunlight has paid only minimal damages to date, Sunlight cannot be sure that a court of law would not determine that Sunlight is liable for the actions of the contractors in Sunlight’s networks or that a regulator or state attorney general’s office may hold Sunlight accountable for violations of consumer protection or other applicable laws by the contractors in selling Sunlight loans. Sunlight’s risk mitigation processes may not be sufficient to mitigate financial harm to Sunlight or its capital providers associated with violations of applicable law by its contractors or that any such contractor would or is able to make good on its indemnification obligations to Sunlight or its capital providers. Any significant finding making Sunlight liable for damages in such claims could expose Sunlight to broader liabilities, a need to adjust its distribution channels for its loan products or otherwise change its business model, and could have a material and adverse impact on Sunlight’s business prospects.

The highly regulated environment in which Sunlight’s capital providers operate could have an adverse effect on Sunlight’s business.

Sunlight and its capital providers are subject to federal and state supervision and regulation. Federal and state regulation of the banking industry, credit unions and other types of capital providers, along with tax and accounting laws, regulations, rules and standards, may limit their operations significantly and control the methods by which they conduct business and when and how they are able to deploy their capital. These requirements may constrain Sunlight’s ability to enter funding program agreements with new capital providers or the ability of its existing capital providers to continue originating loans through Sunlight’s Platform. In choosing whether and how to conduct business with Sunlight, current and prospective capital providers can be expected to take into account the legal, regulatory and supervisory regimes that apply to them, including potential changes in the application or interpretation of regulatory standards, licensing requirements or supervisory expectations. Regulators may elect to alter standards or the interpretation of the standards

TABLE OF CONTENTS

used to measure regulatory compliance or to determine the adequacy of liquidity, certain risk management or other operational practices for financial services companies in a manner that impacts capital providers’ ability to originate loans through Sunlight’s Platform. An inability for an individual or type of capital provider to originate loans through Sunlight’s Platform could materially and adversely affect Sunlight’s ability to grow its business.

The contours of the Dodd-Frank UDAAP standard remain uncertain, and there is a risk that certain features of Sunlight’s business could be deemed to be a UDAAP.

The Dodd-Frank Act prohibits UDAAP and authorizes the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) to enforce that prohibition. The CFPB has filed a large number of UDAAP enforcement actions against consumer lenders for practices that do not appear to violate other consumer finance statutes. There is a risk that the CFPB could determine that certain features of loans for the purchase and installation of solar systems or home improvements or the process by which Sunlight originates such loans are unfair, deceptive or abusive, which could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Most states also have their own statutes designed to protect consumers from UDAAP. In addition, to federal UDAAP claims, Sunlight could also be subject to consumer litigation arising out of state UDAAP laws or state regulatory investigations alleging that Sunlight’s business practices are unfair, deceptive or abusive, which could in turn have similar material adverse effects on Sunlight’s business and financial condition.

Regulations relating to privacy, information security and data protection could increase Sunlight’s costs, affect or limit how Sunlight collects and uses personal information, and adversely affect its business opportunities.

Sunlight is subject to various privacy, information security and data protection laws, including, without limitation, requirements concerning security breach notification, and it could be negatively impacted by them.

Furthermore, legislators and/or regulators are increasingly adopting or revising privacy, information security and data protection laws that potentially could have a significant impact on Sunlight’s current and planned privacy, data protection and information security-related practices; Sunlight’s collection, use, sharing, retention and safeguarding of consumer or employee information; and some of Sunlight’s current or planned business activities. This also could increase Sunlight’s costs of compliance and business operations and could reduce income from certain business initiatives.

Compliance with current or future privacy, information security and data protection laws (including those regarding security breach notification) affecting consumer or employee data to which Sunlight is subject could result in higher compliance and technology costs and could restrict Sunlight’s ability to provide certain products and services (such as products or services that involve sharing information with third parties), which could materially and adversely affect Sunlight’s profitability. Additionally, regulators may attempt to assert authority over Sunlight’s business in the area of privacy, information security and data protection or disagree with our interpretation of laws and regulations related to the foregoing areas apply to us. If Sunlight’s vendors also become subject to laws and regulations in the more stringent and expansive jurisdictions, this could result in increasing costs on Sunlight’s business.

Privacy requirements, including notice and opt-out requirements under the FCRA, are enforced by the FTC and by the CFPB (through UDAAP). State entities also may initiate actions for alleged violations of privacy or security requirements under state law. Sunlight’s failure to comply with privacy, information security and data protection laws could result in potentially significant regulatory investigations and government actions, litigation, fines or sanctions, consumer, capital providers or contractor actions and damage to Sunlight’s reputation and brand, all of which could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

If Sunlight is found to be operating without having obtained necessary state or local licenses, it could adversely affect Sunlight’s business.

Certain states have adopted laws regulating and requiring licensing by parties that engage in certain activity regarding consumer finance transactions, including, in certain circumstances facilitating and assisting

TABLE OF CONTENTS

such transactions. While Sunlight believes it has obtained all necessary licenses, the application of some consumer finance licensing laws to Sunlight’s loans is unclear. Further, if a governmental or enforcement agency determines that Sunlight is the “true lender” of loans originated under its bank partnership arrangement, Sunlight could be found to have violated licensing requirements of several states and other consumer protection statutes. If Sunlight is found to be in violation of applicable state licensing requirements by a court or a state, federal, or local enforcement agency, it could be subject to fines, damages, injunctive relief (including required modification or discontinuation of Sunlight’s business in certain areas), criminal penalties and other penalties or consequences, including indemnification obligations to its capital providers, and the loans originated through Orange® could be rendered void or unenforceable, in whole or in part, any of which could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Sunlight may in the future be subject to federal or state regulatory inquiries regarding its business.

From time to time, in the normal course of its business, Sunlight may receive or be subject to, inquiries or investigations by state and federal regulatory agencies and bodies, such as the CFPB, state attorneys general, state financial regulatory agencies and other state or federal agencies or bodies regarding its loans, including the origination and servicing of consumer loans, practices by contractors or other third parties and licensing and registration requirements. Any such inquiries or investigations could involve substantial time and expense to analyze and respond to, could divert management’s attention and other resources from running Sunlight’s business and could lead to public enforcement actions or lawsuits and fines, penalties, injunctive relief and the need to obtain additional licenses that it does not currently possess. Sunlight’s involvement in any such matters, whether tangential or otherwise and even if the matters are ultimately determined in Sunlight’s favor, could also cause significant harm to its reputation, lead to additional investigations and enforcement actions from other agencies or litigants, and further divert management attention and resources from the operation of Sunlight’s business. As a result, the outcome of legal and regulatory actions arising out of any state or federal inquiries Sunlight receives could be material to its business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows and could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Securities

An active trading market for our Class A Common Stock may never develop or be sustained, which may make it difficult to sell the shares of our Class A Common Stock you purchase.

An active trading market for the our Class A Common Stock may not develop or continue or, if developed, may not be sustained, which would make it difficult for you to sell your shares of our Class A Common Stock at an attractive price (or at all). The market price of our Class A Common Stock may decline below your purchase price, and you may not be able to sell your shares of our Class A Common Stock at or above the price you paid for such shares (or at all).

The market price of our Class A Common Stock and publicly-traded warrants is likely to be highly volatile, and you may lose some or all of your investment.

The market price of our Class A Common Stock and publicly-traded warrants is likely to be highly volatile following the Closing of the Business Combination and may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors, including the following:

•

actual or anticipated fluctuations in operating results;

•

failure to meet or exceed financial estimates and projections of the investment community or that we provide to the public;

•

issuance of new or updated research or reports by securities analysts or changed recommendations for the industry in general;

•

announcements of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, collaborations or capital commitments;

•

operating and share price performance of other companies in the industry or related markets;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

the timing and magnitude of investments in the growth of the business;

•

actual or anticipated changes in laws and regulations;

•

additions or departures of key management or other personnel;

•

sales of substantial amounts of the Class A Common Stock by members of the Sunlight Board, executive officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could occur;

•

changes in capital structure, including future issuances of securities or the incurrence of debt; and

•

general economic, political and market conditions.

In addition, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of affected companies. Broad market and industry factors may seriously affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock, regardless of actual operating performance. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness could continue to adversely affect our ability to report our results of operations and financial condition accurately and in a timely manner.

Following the issuance of the statement regarding the accounting and reporting considerations for warrants issued by special purpose acquisition companies entitled “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”)” by the Acting Director of the Division of Corporation Finance and Acting Chief Accountant of the SEC (the “SEC Staff” and such statement, the “SEC Staff Statement”) on April 12, 2021, and after consultation with our independent registered public accounting firm, our management and our Audit Committee, we concluded that, in light of the SEC Staff Statement, it was appropriate to restate previously issued and audited financial statements as of and for the period ended December 31, 2020 and for the period from August 17, 2020 (inception) to December 31, 2020.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our management is likewise required, on a quarterly basis, to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and to disclose any changes and material weaknesses identified through such evaluation of those internal controls. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

As described elsewhere in this prospectus, we have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for a significant and unusual transaction related to the warrants we issued in connection with the Initial Public Offering in November 2020. As a result of this material weakness, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2020. This material weakness resulted in a material misstatement of our derivative warrant liabilities, change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities, shares of Class A Common Stock subject to possible redemption, accumulated deficit and related financial disclosures for the period from August 17, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020. For a discussion of management’s consideration of the material weakness identified related to our accounting for a significant and unusual transaction related to the warrants we issued in connection with the Initial Public Offering, see “Note 2 — Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements” to Spartan’s audited financial statements (as restated) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020 included elsewhere in this prospectus.

We have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of December 31, 2020 because material weaknesses existed in our internal control over financial reporting. We have taken a number of measures to remediate the material weaknesses described therein; however, if we are unable to

TABLE OF CONTENTS

remediate our material weaknesses in a timely manner or we identify additional material weaknesses, we may be unable to provide required financial information in a timely and reliable manner and we may incorrectly report financial information. Likewise, if our financial statements are not filed on a timely basis, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the stock exchange on which our Class A Common Stock is listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities. The existence of material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting could adversely affect our reputation or investor perceptions of us, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock. In addition, we will incur additional costs to remediate material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as described in our Amendment No. 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

We can give no assurance that the measures we have taken and plan to take in the future will remediate the material weakness identified or that any additional material weaknesses or restatements of financial results will not arise in the future due to a failure to implement and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting or circumvention of these controls. In addition, even if we are successful in strengthening our controls and procedures, in the future those controls and procedures may not be adequate to prevent or identify irregularities or errors or to facilitate the fair presentation of our financial statements.

Additional restatements of financial results, or the time required to evaluate possible errors, may impact the market price for our Class A Common Stock.

There has been recent focus on historical accounting practices by SPACs. For example, on April 12, 2021, the SEC Staff issued the SEC Staff Statement, which resulted in a determination that the warrants and other related instruments issued by many SPACs, including us, being classified as liabilities rather equity. Further guidance from the SEC or industry-wide consensus could result in additional changes in the accounting treatment of features related to SPACs. Changes could result in the recognition of accounting errors in our previously issued financial statements, restatements of our previously issued audited financial statements, the filing of notices that previously issued financial statements may not be relied upon, and findings of material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting.

Our warrants are accounted for as liabilities and the changes in value of our warrants could have a material effect on our financial results.

The SEC Staff Statement regarding the accounting and reporting considerations for warrants issued by SPACs focused on certain settlement terms and provisions related to certain tender offers following a business combination. The terms described in the SEC Staff Statement are common in SPACs and are similar to the terms contained in the warrant agreement governing our warrants. In response to the SEC Staff Statement, we reevaluated the accounting treatment of our public warrants and private placement warrants, and determined to classify the warrants as derivative liabilities measured at fair value, with changes in fair value each period reported in earnings. As a result, included on our balance sheet as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 contained elsewhere in this prospectus are derivative liabilities related to embedded features contained within our warrants. Accounting Standards Codification 815, Derivatives and Hedging, provides for the remeasurement of the fair value of such derivatives at each balance sheet date, with a resulting non-cash gain or loss related to the change in the fair value being recognized in earnings in the statement of operations. As a result of the recurring fair value measurement, our financial statements and results of operations may fluctuate quarterly based on factors which are outside of our control. Due to the recurring fair value measurement, we expect that we will recognize non-cash gains or losses on our warrants each reporting period and that the amount of such gains or losses could be material.

We may face litigation and other risks as a result of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and the restatement of our financial statements.

Following the issuance of the SEC Staff Statement, the Audit Committee of the Sunlight Board, after considering the recommendations of management, determined that it was appropriate to restate our previously filed financial statements for certain periods. See “— Our warrants are accounted for as liabilities and the changes in value of our warrants could have a material effect on our financial results.” As part of this restatement, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As a result of such material weakness, such restatement, the change in accounting for the warrants, and other matters raised or that may in the future be raised by the SEC, we face potential for litigation or other disputes which may include, among others, claims invoking the federal and state securities laws, contractual claims or other claims arising from the restatement and material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements. As of the date of this prospectus, we have no knowledge of any such litigation or dispute. However, we can provide no assurance that such litigation or dispute will not arise in the future. Any such litigation or dispute, whether successful or not, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Sunlight’s management has limited experience in operating a public company.

Sunlight’s executive officers and directors have limited experience in the management of a publicly traded company. Sunlight’s management team may not successfully or effectively manage a public company that is subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under federal securities laws. Their limited experience in dealing with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies could be a significant disadvantage in that it is likely that an increasing amount of their time may be devoted to these activities, which will result in less time being devoted to the management and growth of Sunlight. It is possible that Sunlight will be required to expand its employee base and hire additional employees to support its operations as a public company, which will increase its operating costs in future periods.

Sunlight will incur significant increased expenses and administrative burdens as a public company, which could have an adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Sunlight will face increased legal, accounting, administrative and other costs and expenses as a public company that Sunlight LLC did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), including the requirements of Section 404, as well as rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the rules and regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, the PCAOB and the securities exchanges, impose additional reporting and other obligations on public companies. Compliance with public company requirements will increase costs and make certain activities more time-consuming. A number of those requirements will require Sunlight to carry out activities Sunlight LLC did not do previously. For example, Sunlight will create new board committees and adopt new internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, additional expenses associated with SEC reporting requirements will be incurred. Furthermore, if any issues in complying with those requirements are identified, such as the restatement of our previously issued and consolidated financial statements, and related material weakness as described in the Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on May 21, 2021 (see also “— We may face litigation and other risks as a result of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and the restatement of our financial statements,” and “— We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness could continue to adversely affect our ability to report our results of operations and financial condition accurately and in a timely manner,” for more detail), Sunlight could incur additional costs rectifying those or new issues, and the existence of such issues could adversely affect Sunlight’s reputation or investor perceptions of it. It may also be more expensive to maintain director and officer liability insurance. Risks associated with Sunlight’s status as a public company may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on the Sunlight Board or as executive officers. The additional reporting and other obligations imposed by these rules and regulations will increase legal and financial compliance costs and the costs of related legal, accounting and administrative activities. These increased costs will require Sunlight to divert a significant amount of money that could otherwise be used to expand the business and achieve strategic objectives. Advocacy efforts by stockholders and third parties may also prompt additional changes in governance and reporting requirements, which could further increase costs.

Sunlight may not be able to timely and effectively implement controls and procedures required by Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Sunlight is subject to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is required to provide management’s attestation on internal controls. The standards required for a public company under Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are significantly more stringent than those required of a privately-held company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Management may not be able to effectively and timely implement controls and procedures that adequately respond to the increased regulatory compliance and reporting requirements that are now applicable. If Sunlight is not able to implement the additional requirements of Section 404(a) in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, it may not be able to assess whether its internal controls over financial reporting are effective, which may subject it to adverse regulatory consequences and could harm investor confidence and the market price of its shares of Class A Common Stock.

Sunlight qualifies as an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act and takes advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies, which may make Sunlight’s securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare its performance to the performance of other public companies.

Sunlight qualifies as an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such, Sunlight is eligible for and intends to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies for as long as it continues to be an emerging growth company, including (i) the exemption from the auditor attestation requirements with respect to internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (ii) the exemptions from say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and say-on-golden parachute voting requirements and (iii) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements. Sunlight will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which the market value of the shares of its Class A Common Stock that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of June 30 of that fiscal year, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which it has total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion (as adjusted for inflation pursuant to SEC rules from time to time) or more during such fiscal year, (iii) the date on which it has issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in the prior three-year period and (iv) the last day of the fiscal year following November 30, 2025, the fifth anniversary of the IPO. In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the exemption from complying with new or revised accounting standards provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act so long as Sunlight remains an emerging growth company. An emerging growth company can therefore delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. Sunlight may elect not to avail itself of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, it may not be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. Investors may find Class A Common Stock of Sunlight less attractive because it will rely on these exemptions, which may result in a less active trading market for such Class A Common Stock and its stock price may be more volatile. Additionally, this may make comparison of Sunlight’s financial statements with another public company that is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company that has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

Anti-takeover provisions contained in Sunlight’s governing documents and applicable laws could impair a takeover attempt.

The Second A&R Charter and Sunlight’s bylaws afford certain rights and powers to the Sunlight Board that could contribute to the delay or prevention of an acquisition that it deems undesirable. Sunlight is also subject to Section 203 of the DGCL and other provisions of Delaware law that limit the ability of stockholders in certain situations to effect certain business combinations. Any of the foregoing provisions and terms that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of Class A Common Stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for the Class A Common Stock.

The Second A&R Charter designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

The Second A&R Charter provides that, unless Sunlight consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (“Court of Chancery”) will, to the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

fullest extent permitted by applicable law and subject to applicable jurisdictional requirements, be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction upon the Court of Chancery, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of Sunlight to Sunlight or its stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against Sunlight, its directors, officers or employees arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, the Second A&R Charter or Sunlight’s bylaws or (iv) any action asserting a claim against Sunlight, its directors, officers or employees that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in each case except for such claims as to which (a) the Court of Chancery determines that it does not have personal jurisdiction over an indispensable party, (b) exclusive jurisdiction is vested in a court or forum other than the Court of Chancery or (c) the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction. Further, the forum selection provision is not intended to apply to claims arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. The Second A&R Charter provides that, unless Sunlight consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the federal securities laws of the United States.

If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope of the forum selection provision described in the preceding paragraph, is filed in a court other than the Court of Chancery (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, another state court or a federal court located within the State of Delaware) (a “Foreign Action”) in the name of any stockholder, such stockholder shall be deemed to have consented to (i) the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located within the State of Delaware in connection with any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum selection provision (an “Foreign Enforcement Action”) and (ii) having service of process made upon such stockholder in any such Foreign Enforcement Action by service upon such stockholder’s counsel in the Foreign Action as agent for such stockholder.

Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of Sunlight’s capital stock will be deemed to have notice of, and consented to, the provisions of the Second A&R Charter described in the preceding paragraphs. This exclusive forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with Sunlight or its directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against Sunlight and such persons. Additionally, stockholders who do bring a claim in the Court of Chancery could face additional litigation costs in pursuing any such claim, particularly if they do not reside in or near Delaware. The enforceability of similar exclusive forum provisions in other companies’ certificates of incorporation has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that, in connection with one or more actions or proceedings described above, a court could rule that this provision in the Second A&R Charter is inapplicable or unenforceable. If a court were to find these provisions of the Second A&R Charter inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, Sunlight may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition or results of operations.

Sunlight’s ability to continue successfully operating the business is largely dependent upon the efforts of certain key personnel of Sunlight. The loss of such key personnel could negatively impact the operations and financial results of Sunlight.

Sunlight’s ability to continue successfully operating the business is dependent upon the efforts of certain key personnel of Sunlight. It is possible that Sunlight will lose some key personnel, the loss of which could negatively impact the operations and profitability of Sunlight. Furthermore, certain of the key personnel of Sunlight may be unfamiliar with the requirements of operating a company regulated by the SEC, which could cause Sunlight to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with such requirements.

Some of Sunlight’s relationships with its capital providers, contractors and vendors may experience disruptions in connection with the recent consummation of the Business Combination, which may limit Sunlight’s business.

Parties with which Sunlight did business prior to consummating the Business Combination or may do business with in the future, including contractors, capital providers, consumers and vendors, may experience uncertainty associated with the recent consummation of the Business Combination, including with respect to business relationships with Sunlight. As a result, the business relationships of Sunlight may be subject to

TABLE OF CONTENTS

disruptions if contractors, capital providers, consumers, vendors or others attempt to renegotiate changes in existing business relationships or consider entering into business relationships with parties other than Sunlight. For example, certain third parties with whom Sunlight has business relations may exercise contractual termination rights as they arise or elect to not renew contracts with Sunlight. These disruptions could harm relationships with existing capital providers, contractors, borrowers, vendors or others and preclude Sunlight from originating new loans, all of which could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Sunlight is a holding company and its sole material asset is its indirect equity interest in Sunlight LLC. As a result, Sunlight is dependent upon distributions from Sunlight LLC to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, cover its corporate and other overhead expenses and pay dividends, if any, on its Common Stock.

Sunlight is a holding company, and has no material assets other than its indirect equity interest in Sunlight LLC. Sunlight has no independent means of generating revenue or cash flow. To the extent Sunlight LLC has available cash, taking into account available borrowings, and subject to the terms of any current or future debt instruments, the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement requires Sunlight LLC to make pro rata cash distributions to all holders of Sunlight Units, including Sunlight in an amount generally intended to allow the holders of Sunlight Units, including Sunlight, to satisfy their respective income tax liabilities with respect to their allocable share of the income of Sunlight LLC, based on certain assumptions, provided that tax distributions, except in limited circumstances, will be made sufficient to allow Sunlight to satisfy its actual tax liabilities and obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Sunlight expects Sunlight LLC to fund such distributions out of available cash, taking into account available borrowings, and in the event that payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement are accelerated, where applicable, Sunlight generally expects to fund such accelerated payment out of the proceeds of the Change of Control (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement) giving rise to such acceleration. In addition, the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement allows Spartan Sub, as the sole managing member of Sunlight LLC, to cause Sunlight LLC to make non-pro rata payments to Sunlight to reimburse it for its corporate and other overhead expenses, which payments are not treated as distributions under the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement. To the extent that Sunlight needs funds and Sunlight LLC fails to generate sufficient cash flow to distribute funds to it or is restricted from making such distributions or payments under applicable law or regulation or under the terms of its financing arrangements, or is otherwise unable to provide such funds, Sunlight’s liquidity and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Moreover, because Sunlight has no independent means of generating revenue, Sunlight’s ability to make tax payments and payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement are dependent on the ability of Sunlight LLC to make distributions to Sunlight in an amount sufficient to cover Sunlight’s tax obligations and payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement. This ability, in turn, may depend on the ability of any subsidiaries Sunlight LLC may have in the future to make distributions to it. The ability of Sunlight LLC, any subsidiaries and any other entity in which it may own an interest, to make such distributions is subject to, among other things, (i) the applicable provisions of Delaware law (or other applicable jurisdiction) that may limit the amount of funds available for distribution and (ii) restrictions in relevant debt instruments of Sunlight LLC and its subsidiaries, if any. To the extent that Sunlight is unable to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for any reason, such payments will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid.

Sunlight has never paid cash dividends on its capital stock, and does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.

Sunlight has not paid any cash dividends on its capital stock to date. Sunlight may retain future earnings, if any, for future operations, expansion and debt repayment and has no current plans to pay cash dividends for the foreseeable future. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of the Sunlight Board and will depend on, among other things, Sunlight’s results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors that the Sunlight Board may deem relevant. In addition, Sunlight’s ability to pay dividends is limited by covenants regarding its existing outstanding indebtedness.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Blocker Holders and Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders own a significant amount of Sunlight’s voting stock and are entitled to appoint a majority of its board members, and their interests may conflict with those of other stockholders.

The Blocker Holders and Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders own approximately 61.4% of Sunlight’s voting stock and are entitled to appoint up to seven of the nine members of the Sunlight Board (although four of the seven appointed directors must be independent directors, as further described in the Investor Rights Agreement). In addition, each of the Blocker Holders and the Sponsor have the right to appoint and nominate persons to serve on the Sunlight Board, so long as such person continues to own at least 50.0% of the number of shares of our Common Stock owned immediately after the Closing. For a further description of such rights, see “Management — Board Composition.” As a result, the Blocker Holders and Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders may be able to substantially influence matters requiring stockholder or board approval, including the election of directors, approval of any potential acquisition of Sunlight, changes to its organizational documents and significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership makes it unlikely that any other holder or group of holders of Sunlight’s Class A Common Stock will be able to affect the way Sunlight is managed or the direction of its business. The interests of the Blocker Holders and Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders with respect to matters potentially or actually involving or affecting Sunlight, such as future acquisitions, financings and other corporate opportunities and attempts to acquire Sunlight may conflict with the interests of other stockholders.

For example, the Blocker Holders and the Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders may have different tax positions from Sunlight, especially in light of the Tax Receivable Agreement, that could influence their decisions regarding whether and when to support the disposition of assets or the incurrence or refinancing of new or existing indebtedness, or the termination of the Tax Receivable Agreement and acceleration of Sunlight’s obligations thereunder. In addition, the determination of future tax reporting positions, the structuring of future transactions and the handling of any challenge by any taxing authority to Sunlight’s tax reporting positions may take into consideration tax or other considerations of the Blocker Holders and Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders, including the effect of such positions on Sunlight’s obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which may differ from the considerations of Sunlight or its other stockholders.

Sunlight is required to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for certain tax benefits that it may claim, and the amounts of such payments could be significant.

In connection with the Business Combination, Sunlight entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement, which generally provides for the payment by Sunlight to the Agent, for disbursement to the TRA Holders on a pro rata basis, of 85% of the net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax and franchise tax (computed using simplifying assumptions to address the impact of state and local taxes) that Sunlight actually realizes (or is deemed to realize in certain circumstances) in periods after the consummation of the Business Combination as a result of certain increases in tax basis available to Sunlight as a result of its acquisition of Sunlight Class EX Units (accompanied by a corresponding number of shares of Class C Common Stock) pursuant to an exercise of the Redemption Right or Spartan’s Call Right (each as defined in the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement) (including any increases in tax basis relating to prior transfers of such Sunlight Class EX Units that will be available to Sunlight as a result of its acquisition of such Sunlight Class EX Units), and certain benefits attributable to imputed interest. Sunlight will retain the benefit of the remainder of the actual net cash savings, if any.

The term of the Tax Receivable Agreement commenced upon the consummation of the Business Combination and will continue until all tax benefits that are subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement have been utilized or expired, unless Sunlight exercises its right to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement (or the Tax Receivable Agreement is terminated due to Sunlight’s breach of a material obligation thereunder or certain mergers or other changes of control), and Sunlight makes the termination payments as specified in the Tax Receivable Agreement. In addition, payments Sunlight makes under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be increased by any interest accrued from the due date (without extensions) of the corresponding tax return. In the event that the Tax Receivable Agreement is not terminated early, the payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement are anticipated to commence following the first exercise of the Redemption Right following the consummation of the Business Combination and to continue for at least 15 years after the date of the last redemption of Sunlight Class EX Units.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We expect that the payments Sunlight is required to make under the Tax Receivable Agreement could be substantial. Estimating the amount and timing of Sunlight’s realization of tax benefits subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement is by its nature imprecise. The actual increases in tax basis covered by the Tax Receivable Agreement, as well as the amount and timing of Sunlight’s ability to use any deductions (or decreases in gain or increases in loss) arising from such increases in tax basis, are dependent upon significant future events, including but not limited to the timing of the redemptions of Sunlight Class EX Units, the price of the Class A Common Stock at the time of each redemption, the extent to which such redemptions are taxable transactions, the amount of the redeeming unitholder’s tax basis in its Sunlight Class EX Units at the time of the relevant redemption, the depreciation and amortization periods that apply to the increase in tax basis, the amount, character, and timing of taxable income Sunlight generates in the future, the U.S. federal income tax rate then applicable, and the portion of Sunlight’s payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement that constitute imputed interest or give rise to depreciable or amortizable tax basis. For purposes of the Tax Receivable Agreement, net cash savings in tax generally will be calculated by comparing Sunlight’s actual tax liability (determined by using the actual applicable U.S. federal income tax rate and an assumed combined state and local income tax rate) to the amount Sunlight would have been required to pay had it not been able to utilize any of the tax benefits subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement. Thus, the amount and timing of any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement are also dependent upon significant future events, including those noted above in respect of estimating the amount and timing of Sunlight’s realization of tax benefits. Any distributions made by Sunlight LLC to Sunlight in order to enable Sunlight to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, as well as any corresponding pro rata distributions made to the other holders of Sunlight Units, could have an adverse impact on Sunlight’s liquidity.

The payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will not be conditioned upon a TRA Holder having a continued ownership interest in Sunlight or Sunlight LLC. In addition, certain of the TRA Holders’ rights (including the right to receive payments) under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be transferable, subject to Sunlight’s consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed), at the option of such TRA Holder.

In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual benefits, if any, Sunlight realizes in respect of the tax attributes subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement.

If Sunlight experiences a Change of Control (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement) or the Tax Receivable Agreement terminates early (at Sunlight’s election or as a result of Sunlight’s material breach thereunder), Sunlight will be required to make a payment equal to the deemed present value of the anticipated future payments to be made by it under the Tax Receivable Agreement (determined by applying a discount rate equal to SOFR (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement) plus 100 basis points), and such early termination payment could be substantial, depending, among other things, on the timing of such early termination. The calculation of anticipated future payments would be based upon certain assumptions and deemed events set forth in the Tax Receivable Agreement, including (i) that Sunlight has sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the tax benefits covered by the Tax Receivable Agreement, and (ii) that any Sunlight Class EX Units outstanding on the termination date or Change of Control date, as applicable, are deemed to be redeemed on such date. In the case of termination at Sunlight’s election or as a result of Sunlight’s material breach, the termination payment would be due immediately. In the case of a Change of Control of Sunlight, Sunlight will have the option to make such early termination payment immediately upon such Change of Control or ratably over a two-year period following the Change of Control. In such situations, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may be made significantly in advance of, and may materially exceed, the actual realization, if any, of the future tax benefits to which the early termination payment relates.

If Sunlight experiences a Change of Control or the Tax Receivable Agreement terminates early (at Sunlight’s election or as a result of Sunlight’s material breach thereunder), Sunlight’s obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s liquidity and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, or other forms of business combinations or changes of control, or reduce the consideration payable to holders of shares of Class A Common Stock. In the event that Sunlight’s obligation to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement is accelerated as a result of a Change of Control, where applicable, we generally expect the accelerated

TABLE OF CONTENTS

payments due under the Tax Receivable Agreement to be funded out of the proceeds of the Change of Control giving rise to such acceleration. However, Sunlight may be required to fund such payment from other sources, and as a result, any early termination of Sunlight’s obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity and may substantially reduce the consideration payable to holders of Sunlight’s Class A Common Stock in connection with a Change of Control. Sunlight does not currently expect to cause an acceleration due to breach, and does not currently expect that Sunlight would elect to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement early, except in cases where the early termination payment would not be material. There can be no assurance that Sunlight will be able to meet its obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement.

In the event that Sunlight’s payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement are accelerated upon by certain mergers, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control, the consideration payable to holders of Class A Common Stock could be substantially reduced.

If Sunlight experiences a Change of Control (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement), Sunlight would be obligated to make a payment immediately or ratably over the two-year period, at the option of Sunlight, following the Change of Control, and such payment or payments may be significantly in advance of, and may materially exceed, the actual realization, if any, of the future tax benefits to which the payment relates. As a result of Sunlight’s payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, holders of Class A Common Stock could receive substantially less consideration in connection with a Change of Control than they would receive in the absence of such obligation. Further, Sunlight’s payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement are not conditioned upon TRA Holders’ having a continued interest in Sunlight of Sunlight LLC. Accordingly, a TRA Holders’ interests may conflict with those of the holders of Class A Common Stock. Please read “— In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual benefits, if any, Sunlight realizes in respect of the tax attributes subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement.”

Sunlight will not be reimbursed for any payments made under the Tax Receivable Agreement in the event that any tax benefits are subsequently disallowed.

Payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that Sunlight will determine, and the IRS or another tax authority may challenge all or part of the tax basis increases upon which the payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement are based, as well as other related tax positions Sunlight takes, and a court could sustain such challenge. The TRA Holders will not reimburse Sunlight for any payments previously made under the Tax Receivable Agreement if any tax benefits that have given rise to payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement are subsequently disallowed, except that excess payments made to any such TRA Holders will be netted against future payments that would otherwise be made to such TRA Holders, if any, after Sunlight’s determination of such excess (which determination may be made a number of years following the initial payment and after future payments have been made). As a result, in such circumstances, Sunlight could make payments that are greater than its actual cash tax savings, if any, and may not be able to recoup those payments, which could materially adversely affect its liquidity.

In certain circumstances, Sunlight LLC will be required to make tax distributions to holders of Sunlight Units, including Sunlight, and such tax distributions may be substantial. To the extent Sunlight receives tax distributions in excess of its actual tax liabilities and retains such excess cash, holders of Sunlight Class EX Units would benefit from such accumulated cash balances if they exercise their redemption right.

Pursuant to the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement, to the extent Sunlight LLC has available cash (taking into account Sunlight LLC’s borrowing capacity), Sunlight LLC will generally be required to make pro rata distributions (which we refer to as “tax distributions”), to all holders of Sunlight Units, including Sunlight, in an amount generally intended to allow holders of Sunlight Units, including Sunlight, to satisfy their respective income tax liabilities with respect to their allocable share of the income of Sunlight LLC, based on certain assumptions and conventions, provided that tax distributions will be made, except in limited circumstances, sufficient to allow Sunlight to satisfy its actual tax liabilities and obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement. The amount of such tax distributions will be determined based on certain assumptions, including an assumed individual income tax rate (unless the corporate tax rate is higher), and

TABLE OF CONTENTS

will be calculated after taking into account other distributions (including prior tax distributions) made by Sunlight LLC. Because tax distributions will be made pro rata based on ownership and due to, among other items, differences between the tax rates applicable to Sunlight and the assumed individual income tax rate used in the calculation and requirements under the applicable tax rules that Sunlight LLC’s net taxable income be allocated disproportionately to its unitholders in certain circumstances, tax distributions may significantly exceed the actual tax liability for many of the holders of Sunlight Units, including Sunlight. If Sunlight retains the excess cash it receives, the holders of Sunlight Class EX Units would benefit from any value attributable to such accumulated cash balances as a result of their exercise of the Redemption Right (as defined in the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement). However, Sunlight expects to take other steps to eliminate any material cash balances. In addition, the tax distributions Sunlight LLC will be required to make may be substantial and may exceed the tax liabilities that would be owed by a similarly situated corporate taxpayer. Funds used by Sunlight LLC to satisfy its tax distribution obligations will not be available for reinvestment in our business, except to the extent Sunlight uses the excess cash it receives to reinvest in Sunlight LLC for additional Sunlight Units. In addition, because cash available for additional tax distributions is determined by taking into account the ability of Sunlight LLC and any subsidiaries to incur additional borrowing, Sunlight LLC may be required to increase its indebtedness in order to fund additional tax distributions. Such additional borrowing may adversely affect Sunlight LLC’s financial condition and business operations by, without limitation, limiting Sunlight LLC’s ability to borrow in the future for other purposes, such as capital expenditures, and increasing Sunlight LLC’s interest expense and leverage ratios.

If Sunlight LLC were to become a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Sunlight and Sunlight LLC might be subject to potentially significant tax inefficiencies, and Sunlight would not be able to recover payments previously made by it under the Tax Receivable Agreement even if the corresponding tax benefits were subsequently determined to have been unavailable due to such status.

Sunlight LLC intends to operate such that it does not become a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A “publicly traded partnership” is a partnership the interests of which are listed for trading on an established securities market or are readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof. Under certain circumstances, redemptions of Sunlight Class EX Units pursuant to the Redemption Right (or the Call Right) (each as defined in the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement) or other transfers of Sunlight Class EX Units could cause Sunlight LLC to be treated as a publicly traded partnership. Applicable U.S. Treasury regulations provide for certain safe harbors from treatment as a publicly traded partnership, and we intend to operate such that redemptions or other transfers of Sunlight Class EX Units qualify for one or more such safe harbors. For example, we have limited the number of unitholders of Sunlight LLC, and the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement provides for limitations on the ability of unitholders of Sunlight LLC to transfer their Sunlight Class EX Units and provides Sunlight, through its control of the sole managing member of Sunlight LLC, with the right to impose restrictions (in addition to those already in place) on the ability of unitholders of Sunlight LLC to redeem their Sunlight Class EX Units pursuant to the Redemption Right (as defined in the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement) to the extent Sunlight believes it is necessary to ensure that Sunlight LLC will continue to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

If Sunlight LLC were to become a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, significant tax inefficiencies might result for Sunlight and for Sunlight LLC, for example, if Sunlight is not able to file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return with Sunlight LLC. In addition, Sunlight may not be able to realize tax benefits covered under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and Sunlight would not be able to recover any payments previously made by it under the Tax Receivable Agreement, even if the corresponding tax benefits (including any claimed increase in the tax basis of Sunlight LLC’s assets) were subsequently determined to have been unavailable.

Increases in applicable tax rates, changes in applicable tax laws or disagreements with tax authorities can adversely affect Sunlight’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Sunlight has no material assets other than its indirect interest in Sunlight LLC, which holds, directly or indirectly, all of the operating assets of Sunlight’s business. Sunlight LLC generally is not subject to U.S. federal income tax. Sunlight is a U.S. corporation that is subject to U.S. corporate income tax on its worldwide

TABLE OF CONTENTS

operations, including its share of income of Sunlight LLC. Sunlight and Sunlight LLC are also subject to various U.S. federal, state and local taxes.

New U.S. laws and policy relating to taxes may have an adverse effect on Sunlight’s and Sunlight LLC’s business and future profitability. Further, existing U.S. tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified or applied adversely to Sunlight and Sunlight LLC. Increases in income tax rates or other changes in income tax laws in the United States or any particular jurisdiction in which Sunlight LLC operates or is otherwise subject to tax can reduce Sunlight’s after-tax income from such jurisdiction and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Existing tax laws in the United States have been and could in the future be subject to significant change. For example, in December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJ Act”), was signed into law in the United States, making significant changes to the Code. While Sunlight’s accounting for the recorded impact of the TCJ Act is deemed to be complete, these amounts are based on prevailing regulations and currently available information, and additional guidance issued by the IRS may continue to impact Sunlight’s recorded amounts in future periods. Further, President Joe Biden has set forth several tax proposals that would, if enacted, make significant changes to U.S. tax laws (including provisions enacted pursuant to the TCJ Act), including an increase in the U.S. income tax rate applicable to corporations from 21% to 28%. It is unclear whether these or similar changes will be enacted and, if enacted, how soon any such changes could take effect. Additional changes in the United States tax regime, including changes in how existing tax laws are interpreted or enforced, can adversely affect Sunlight’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Sunlight is subject to reviews, examinations and audits by the IRS and other taxing authorities with respect to income and non-income-based taxes. Economic and political pressures to increase tax revenues in jurisdictions in which Sunlight operates, or the adoption of new or reformed tax legislation or regulation, may make resolving tax disputes more difficult and the final resolution of tax audits and any related litigation can differ from Sunlight’s historical provisions and accruals, resulting in an adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

If exercised, the Sunlight Warrants and the Tech Capital Warrants, which are exercisable for our Class A Common Stock, will increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our stockholders.

As of September 2, 2021, there were 17,250,000 public warrants, 9,900,000 private placement warrants and the Tech Capital Warrants, exercisable for a total of 627,780 shares of Class A Common Stock, outstanding, collectively exercisable for a total of 27,777,780 shares of Class A Common Stock. The shares of our Class A Common Stock issued upon the exercise of such warrants will result in dilution to the then existing holders of Class A Common Stock and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market could adversely affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock.

The Sunlight Warrants are being accounted for as a warrant liability and are being recorded at fair value upon issuance with changes in fair value each period reported in earnings, which may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Common Stock.

Under U.S. GAAP, we are required to evaluate the Sunlight Warrants to determine whether they should be accounted for as a warrant liability or as equity. We have concluded that the Sunlight Warrants contain provisions requiring liability classification. Therefore, as described in the financial statements of Spartan included herein, we are accounting for the Sunlight Warrants as a warrant liability and are recording that liability at fair value upon issuance. We will record any subsequent changes in fair value as of the end of each period for which earnings are reported. The impact of changes in fair value on earnings may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Common Stock and may cause fluctuations in our results of operations based on factors that are outside of our control.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Risks Related to the Private Placement Warrants, Sunlight Warrants and Class C Common Stock (with Class EX Units)

We may amend the terms of the private placement warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders of private placement warrants with the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants. As a result, the exercise price of your private placement warrants could be increased, the private placement warrant could be converted into cash or stock (at a ratio different than initially provided), the exercise period could be shortened and the number of shares of our Class A Common Stock purchasable upon exercise of a private placement warrant could be decreased, all without your approval.

Our private placement warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the private placement warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the holders of private placement warrants. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the private placement warrants in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the private placement warrants with the consent of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the private placement warrants, convert the private placement warrants into cash or stock (at a ratio different than initially provided), shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of shares of our Class A Common Stock purchasable upon exercise of a private placement warrant.

We may redeem your unexpired private placement warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your warrants worthless.

Although none of the private placement warrants are redeemable by us so long as they are held by the Sponsor or its permitted transferees, the private placement warrants will become redeemable by us on terms set forth under the subsection “Description of Securities — Warrants — Private Placement Warrants” if they are sold by the Sponsor or its permitted transferees. If so redeemed by us, they may be redeemed at an inopportune time and at a price that does not reflect the value of the private placement warrants so redeemed.

If the Sunlight Warrants are exercised on a “cashless” basis, the holder will receive fewer shares of Class A Common Stock from such exercise than if the holder were to exercise such warrants for cash.

There are circumstances in which the exercise of the Sunlight Warrants may be required or permitted to be made on a cashless basis. First, if our shares of Class A Common Stock are at any time of any exercise of a Sunlight Warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that it satisfies the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option, require holders of redeemable Sunlight Warrants who exercise their redeemable warrants to do so on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement, and in the event we do not so elect, we will use commercially reasonable efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available. In such circumstances, each holder would exchange a number of Sunlight Warrants for a number of shares of Class A Common Stock equal to the number of warrants exchanged multiplied by the lesser of (A) the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of (i) the number of shares of our Class A Common Stock underlying such warrants, and (ii) the excess of the “fair market value” (defined below) over the exercise price of such warrants by (y) such fair market value and (B) the product of the number of warrants surrendered and 0.361 (subject to adjustment). The “fair market value” of our Class A Common Stock as used in this paragraph shall mean the average reported last sale price of our Class A Common Stock for the 10 trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of Sunlight Warrants. Second, if we call our redeemable Sunlight Warrants for redemption for cash when the price per share of Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $10.00, holders who exercise their warrants will receive that number of shares set forth in the table as described under the subsection “Description of Securities — Warrants — Public Stockholders’ Warrants — Redemption of warrants when the price per share of Class A Common Stock equals or

TABLE OF CONTENTS

exceeds $10.00.” As a result, the holder would receive fewer shares of Class A Common Stock from such exercise than if the holder were to exercise such warrants for cash.

We may redeem the unexpired public warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to the holder thereof, thereby making such warrants worthless.

We have the ability to redeem the outstanding public warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, provided that the last reported sales price of our Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which we give proper notice of such redemption and provided certain other conditions are met.

If and when the outstanding public warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. As a result, we may redeem the outstanding public warrants as set forth above even if the holders are otherwise unable to exercise the public warrants. Redemption of the outstanding public warrants could force the holder (i) to exercise its warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for such holder to do so, (ii) to sell its public warrants at the then-current market price when it might otherwise wish to hold its public warrants or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding public warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of the public warrants.

The Sunlight Warrants and Tech Capital Warrants will become exercisable for shares of Class A Common Stock, which would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our stockholders.

The Sunlight Warrants are exercisable for 27,150,000 shares of Class A Common Stock. The Tech Capital Warrants outstanding are exercisable for 627,780 shares of Class A Common Stock. The shares of our Class A Common Stock issued upon exercise of the Sunlight Warrants and the Tech Capital Warrants will result in dilution to the then existing holders of Class A Common Stock and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market could adversely affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will receive proceeds equal to the aggregate exercise price from any exercise of the Sunlight Warrants or Tech Capital Warrants, assuming the exercise in full of all of such warrants for cash. We expect to use the net proceeds from the exercise of such warrants for general corporate purposes. We will have broad discretion over the use of proceeds from the exercise of such warrants. There is no assurance that the holders of such warrants will elect to exercise any or all of such warrants. To the extent that the Sunlight Warrants or Tech Capital Warrants are exercised on a “cashless basis,” the amount of cash we would receive from the exercise of such warrants will decrease.

We will also receive the proceeds from sales by us of the shares of Class A Common Stock in respect of certain withholdings for tax payments. We expect to use the net proceeds from the sale of such shares (i) first, to offset the cash payments made by us to satisfy the payment obligation related to the tax withholding and, (ii) if any such proceeds remain, for general corporate purposes.

All of the shares of Class A Common Stock and private placement warrants offered by the Selling Securityholders pursuant to this prospectus will be sold by the Selling Securityholders for their account. We will not receive any of the proceeds from these sales.

The Selling Securityholders will pay any underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses incurred by the Selling Securityholders for brokerage, accounting, tax or legal services or any other expenses incurred by the Selling Securityholders in disposing of the securities. We will bear the costs, fees and expenses incurred in effecting the registration of the securities covered by this prospectus, including all registration and filing fees, listing fees and fees and expenses of our counsel and our independent registered public accounting firm.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MARKET INFORMATION FOR SECURITIES AND DIVIDEND POLICY

Market Information

Spartan’s units, Class A Common Stock and warrants were historically listed for trading on the NYSE under the symbols “SPRQ U”, “SPRQ” and “SPRQ WS”, respectively. On July 12, 2021, the Class A Common Stock and publicly-traded warrants began trading on the NYSE under the new trading symbols of “SUNL” and “SUNL WS”, respectively. Spartan’s units automatically separated into their component securities upon the Closing and, as a result, no longer trade as a separate security and have been delisted from the NYSE.

Prior to the Closing, there was no established public trading market for Sunlight’s member interests.

As of the Closing Date and following the completion of the Business Combination and the redemption of public shares described above, the Company had 84,837,655 (excludes 1,535,941 of shares held by Sunlight in respect of net withholding for tax payments) shares of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding held of record by 122 holders, 47,595,455 shares of Class C Common Stock outstanding and held of record by 21 holders, 27,150,000 warrants outstanding held of record by 2 holders and no shares of preferred stock outstanding. The Tech Capital Warrants were also outstanding and exercisable for 627,780 shares of Class A Common Stock. Such amounts do not include DTC participants or beneficial owners holding shares through nominee names.

As of September 2, 2021, we had 84,837,655 (excludes 1,535,941 of shares held by Sunlight in respect of net withholding for tax payments) shares of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding held of record by 122 holders, 47,595,455 shares of Class C Common Stock outstanding and held of record by 21 holders, 27,150,000 warrants outstanding held of record by two holders and no shares of preferred stock outstanding. The Tech Capital Warrants were also outstanding and exercisable for 627,780 shares of Class A Common Stock. Such amounts do not include DTC participants or beneficial owners holding shares through nominee names.

Dividends

Certain Indebtedness

Sunlight’s Prior Credit Facility

As of December 31, 2020, Sunlight maintained a $15.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). The interest rate on the Credit Facility was generally equal to the prime rate plus 0.75%, and the maturity date thereof was May 2021. Sunlight used borrowings from the Credit Facility for working capital.

Sunlight’s New Credit Facility

On April 26, 2021, Sunlight entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with SVB (as defined below). The Loan and Security Agreement, which replaces Sunlight’s prior $15.0 million Credit Facility, has a borrowing capacity of up to $30.0 million and matures on April 26, 2023. Borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement accrue interest at a rate equal to the greater of (i) 5.0% and (ii) the prime rate plus 1.75% per annum. The Loan and Security Agreement contains certain financial covenants, including (i) liquidity in an amount equal to or greater than (a) 35% of all outstanding principal amounts of any advances and (b) $10.0 million; (ii) Available Takeout Commitment Amount (as defined therein) in an amount equal to or

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Introduction:

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X as amended by the final rule, Release No. 33-10786 “Amendments to Financial Disclosures about Acquired and Disposed Businesses.” The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information presents the pro forma effects of the acquisition of Sunlight by Spartan consummated on July 9, 2021, resulting reorganization into an umbrella partnership C corporation structure (or “Up-C” structure), and other agreements entered into as part of the Business Combination Agreement.

Spartan is a blank check company incorporated in Delaware on August 17, 2020 (inception) for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses. The registration statement for the IPO was declared effective on November 24, 2020. On November 30, 2020, Spartan consummated its IPO of 34,500,000 units, including the issuance of 4,500,000 units as a result of the underwriter’s exercise in full of its over-allotment option, at $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of approximately $345.0 million. Simultaneously with the closing of the IPO, Spartan consummated the private placement of 9,900,000 Spartan Warrants, at a price of $1.00 per Spartan Warrant to the Sponsor, generating proceeds of $9.9 million. Each Spartan Warrant is exercisable to purchase for $11.50 one share of Class A Common Stock. As of June 30, 2021, there was approximately $345.0 million held in the Trust Account.

Sunlight is a business-to-business-to-consumer, technology-enabled point-of-sale (POS) financing platform that provides residential solar and home improvement contractors the ability to offer seamless POS financing to their customers when purchasing residential solar systems or other home improvements. The resulting loans are funded by Sunlight’s network of capital providers who, by partnering with Sunlight, gain access to a difficult-to-reach loan market, best-in-class consumer credit underwriting and attractive risk adjusted returns. These loans are facilitated by Sunlight’s proprietary technology platform, Orange®, through which Sunlight offers instant credit decisions to homeowners nationwide at the POS on behalf of Sunlight’s various capital providers. Since Sunlight’s founding in 2014, Sunlight has facilitated over $4.8 billion of loans through the Sunlight Platform in partnership with over 1,500 contractor relationships.

The organizational structure following the completion of the Business Combination, as described above, is an “Up-C” structure. This organizational structure will allow the Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders and holders of Sunlight Warrants (collectively, the “Flow-Through Sellers”) to retain equity ownership in Sunlight, an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, in the form of Sunlight Class EX Units. Each Sunlight Class EX Unit, together with one share of Class C Common Stock, will be redeemable, subject to certain conditions, for either one share of Class A Common Stock, or at Sunlight’s election, an amount of cash approximately equivalent to the market value of one share of Class A Common Stock, pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement. The public stockholders will continue to hold Class A Common Stock of Spartan, which, upon consummation of the Business Combination, will be renamed to Sunlight Financial Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation that is a domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

As a result of the closing of the Business Combination on July 9, 2021, the risk factors previously discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of Spartan’s Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2020, filed with the SEC on May 11, 2021, no longer apply. For risk factors relating to our business following the Business Combination, please refer to the information set forth under “Risk Factors” of this prospectus.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2021 assumes that the Business Combination occurred on June 30, 2021. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and for the year ended December 31, 2020 present the pro forma effect of the Business Combination as if they had been completed on January 1, 2020.

We refer to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations as the pro forma financial information.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of what the Sunlight Financial Holdings’ balance sheet or statement of operations actually would have been had the Business Combination been completed as of the dates indicated, nor do they purport to project the future financial position or operating results of the combined company. The actual financial position and results of operations may differ significantly from the pro forma amounts reflected herein due to a variety of factors. The pro forma financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not reflect the costs of any integration activities or cost savings or synergies that may be achieved as a result of the Business Combination.

The following summarizes the pro forma ownership of Class A Common Stock of Sunlight Financial Holdings following the Business Combination:

(Shares in thousands)	Shares		%
Existing Sunlight Owners interest in Spartan(1)(2)		38,373		44.6%
Spartan public stockholders		15,273		17.8
Sponsor and related parties		7,437		8.6
Third party PIPE investors		25,000		29.0
Total Class A Common Stock in Spartan		86,083		100.0%

This excludes the impact of shares of Class A Common Stock that are subject to vesting as of the Closing, which will be accounted for as post Business Combination compensation expenses. This also excludes the Flow-Through Sellers’ noncontrolling economic interest in Class EX Units, which will be redeemable (together with a corresponding number of shares of voting, non-economic Class C Common Stock) for Class A Common Stock on a 1-for-1 basis or cash, pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement. The table below presents the Class EX Units and noncontrolling interest percentage in Sunlight, excluding the impact of Class EX Units that are subject to vesting as of the Closing, which will be accounted for as post Business Combination compensation expenses:

(Units in thousands)

Units

% of Sunlight

Flow-Through Seller’s Class EX Units and noncontrolling interest percentage in Sunlight

46,936

35.3%

The existing direct and indirect Sunlight owners’ interest in Spartan included the shares to be issued to satisfy one of the Sellers’ tax withholdings requirements in connection with the Business Combination.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information was prepared using the acquisition method of accounting under the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”) on the basis of Spartan as the accounting acquirer and Sunlight as the accounting acquiree. The ultimate determination of the accounting acquirer is a qualitative and quantitative assessment that requires careful consideration. Spartan has been determined to be the accounting acquirer based on evaluation of the following factors:

•

Sunlight is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). Spartan Sub will be the sole managing member and primary beneficiary who has full and complete charge of all affairs of Sunlight, and the existing non-managing member stockholders of Sunlight do not have substantive participating or kick out rights; and

•

No single party controls Sunlight pre and post transaction, hence, the Business Combination is not considered a common control transaction.

The factors discussed above support the conclusion that Spartan will acquire a controlling financial interest in Sunlight and will be the accounting acquirer. Spartan is the primary beneficiary of Sunlight, which is a VIE, since it has the power to direct the activities of Sunlight that most significantly impact Sunlight’s economic performance through its control of Spartan Sub, which will be the sole managing member of Sunlight, and Spartan’s variable interests in Sunlight include ownership of Sunlight, which results in the right (and obligation) to receive benefits (and absorb losses) of Sunlight that could potentially be significant to Sunlight. Therefore, the Business Combination will be accounted for using the acquisition

TABLE OF CONTENTS

method. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the purchase price will be allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Sunlight, based on their estimated acquisition-date fair values. Transaction costs related to the Business Combination will be expensed as if the Business Combination consummated on January 1, 2020.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2021 and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and for the year ended December 31, 2020 are based on the historical financial statements (as restated) of Spartan and historical financial statements of Sunlight. The unaudited transaction accounting adjustments are based on information currently available, and assumptions and estimates underlying the unaudited transaction accounting adjustments are described in the accompanying notes. Actual results may differ materially from the assumptions used to present the accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.

The assumptions and estimates underlying the unaudited adjustments to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is described in the accompanying notes, which should be read in conjunction with, the following:

•

Spartan’s audited financial statements (as restated) and related notes as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020 included in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

•

Spartan’s unaudited financial statements and related notes as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 included in its 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 16, 2021.

•

Sunlight’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020 included in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

•

Sunlight’s unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 included in the 8-K/A filed with the SEC on August 16, 2021.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF JUNE 30, 2021
($ in thousands, except share amounts)3

	Spartan Historical			Sunlight Historical			Transaction Accounting Adjustments			Notes	Pro Forma Combined
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	140		$	62,521		$	152,750	3a		$	110,587
									250,000	3b
									(310,977)	3c
									(19,192)	3d
									(25,733)	3e
									1,078	3f
Restricted cash			—			3,861			—				3,861
Prepaid expenses			1,375			—			—				1,375
Advances (net allowance for credit losses)			—			40,768			—	—			40,768
Investments held in Trust Account			345,047			—			(345,047)	3a			—
Financing receivables (net of allowance for credit losses)			—			4,707			393	3g			5,100
Property and equipment, net			—			5,693			(4,449)	3g			1,244
Due from affiliates			—			1,839			(1,839)	3f			—
Intangible assets, net			—			—			407,600	3g			407,600
Goodwill			—			—			703,678	3g			703,678
Other assets			—			4,340			—				4,340
Total assets		$	346,562		$	123,729		$	808,262			$	1,278,553
Liabilities and Stockholder’s’ Equity
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	5,676		$	18,873		$	(11,784)	3d,3e		$	12,765
Funding commitments			—			22,164			—				22,164
Debt			—			20,613			—				20,613
Accrued income taxes			—			—			—				—
Franchise tax payable			121			—			—				121
Deferred tax liability			—			—			42,846	3g			42,846
Due to affiliates			1,815			761			(2,576)	3d,3f			—
Deferred underwriting commissions			12,075			—			(12,075)	3d			—
Warrants, at fair value			51,444			9,708			(9,708)	3h			51,444
Other liabilities			—			1,076			1,039	3i			2,115
Total liabilities			71,131			73,195			7,742				152,068

Refer to Note 3 for more information on the adjustments to the Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2021
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)4

	Spartan Historical			Sunlight Historical			Transaction Accounting Adjustments			Note		Pro Forma Combined
Revenues		$	—		$	50,990		$	—				$	50,990
Costs and Expenses
Cost of revenues (exclusive of items shown separately below)			—			10,191			—					10,191
Compensation and benefits			—			16,120			—					16,120
Selling, general, and administrative			7,643			3,120			—					10,763
Property and technology			—			2,268			—					2,628
Depreciation and amortization			—			1,610			14,864		4a			16,474
Franchise tax expense			99			—			—					99
Provision for losses			—			1,172			—					1,172
Management fees to affiliate			—			200			—					200
Total operating expense			7,742			35,041			14,864					57,647
Operating income (loss)			(7,742)			15,949			(14,864)					(6,657)
Interest income			—			253			(37)		4b			216
Interest expense			—			(572)			—					(572)
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities			(9,161)			(4,065)			4,065		4c			(9,161)
Change in fair value of contract derivative			—			(787)			—					(787)
Net gain from investments held in Trust Account			75			—			(75)		4d
Realized gains on contract derivative, net			—			2,986			—					2,986
Other realized losses, net			—			—			—					—
Other income (expense)			—			621			—					621
Business combination expenses						(6,482)			6,482		4e			—
Income (loss) before income taxes			(16,828)			7,903			(4,429)					(13,354)
Income tax expense (benefit)			7			—			(3,748)		4f			(3,741)
Net income (loss)			(16,835)			7,903			(681)					(9,613)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest			—			—			(1,980)		4g			(1,980)
Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders		$	(16,835)			7,903			1,299				$	(7,633)
Weighted average shares outstanding
Weighted average shares outstanding of Class A Common Stock – basic and diluted			34,500			n/a								86,083
Net loss per share, Class A Common Stock – basic and diluted		$	—			n/a							$	(0.09)
Weighted average shares outstanding of Class B Common Stock – basic and diluted			8,625			n/a								n/a
Net loss per share, Class B Common Stock – basic and diluted		$	(1.95)			n/a								n/a

Refer to Note 4 for more information on the adjustments to the Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)5

	Spartan Historical (As Restated)			Sunlight Historical			Transaction Accounting Adjustments			Note		Pro Forma Combined
Revenues		$	—		$	69,564		$	—				$	69,564
Costs and Expenses
Cost of revenues (exclusive of items shown separately below)			—			13,711			—					13,711
Compensation and benefits			—			26,174			—					26,174
Selling, general, and administrative			688			3,806			—					4,494
Property and technology			—			4,304			—					4,304
Depreciation and amortization			—			3,231			72,660		4a			75,891
Franchise tax expense			22			—			—					22
Provision for losses			—			1,350			—					1,350
Management fees to affiliate			—			400			—					400
Total operating expense			710			52,976			72,660					126,346
Operating income (loss)			(710)			16,588			(72,660)					(56,782)
Interest income			—			520			(74)		4b			446
Interest expense			—			(829)			—					(829)
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities			(16,169)			(5,510)			5,510		4c			(16,169)
Transaction costs — derivative warrant liabilities			(963)			—			—					(963)
Change in fair value of contract derivative, net			—			1,435			—					1,435
Net gain from investments held in Trust Account			10			—			(10)		4d			—
Realized gains on contract derivative, net			—			103			—					103
Other realized losses, net			—			(171)			—					(171)
Other income (expense)			—			(634)			—					(634)
Business combination expenses			—			(878)			(18,240)		4e			(19,118)
Income (loss) before income taxes			(17,832)			10,624			(85,474)					(92,682)
Income tax expense (benefit)			—			—			(16,549)		4f			(16,549)
Net income (loss)			(17,832)			10,624			(68,925)					(76,133)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest			—			—			(32,452)		4g			(32,452)
Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders		$	(17,832)		$	10,624		$	(36,473)				$	(43,681)
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted:
Weighted average shares outstanding of Class A Common Stock – basic and diluted			34,500			n/a								86,083
Net loss per share, Class A Common Stock – basic and diluted		$	—			n/a							$	(0.51)
Weighted average shares outstanding of Class B Common Stock – basic and diluted			7,765			n/a								n/a
Net loss per share, Class B Common Stock – basic and diluted		$	(2.30)			n/a								n/a

Refer to Note 4 for more information on the adjustments to the Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Note 1 — Basis of pro forma presentation

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information has been prepared assuming the Business Combination is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting with Spartan as the acquiring entity. Under the acquisition method of accounting, Spartan’s assets and liabilities will retain their carrying values and the assets and liabilities associated with Sunlight will be recorded at their fair values measured as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired, if applicable, will be recorded as goodwill. The acquisition method of accounting is based on ASC 805 and uses the fair value concepts defined in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements (“ASC 820”). In general, ASC 805 requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date by Spartan, who was determined to be the accounting acquirer.

ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and sets forth a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes and ranks the level of observability of inputs used to develop the fair value measurements. Fair value is defined in ASC 820 as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” This is an exit price concept for the valuation of the asset or liability. In addition, market participants are assumed to be buyers and sellers in the principal (or the most advantageous) market for the asset or liability. Fair value measurements for a non-financial asset assume the highest and best use by these market participants. Many of these fair value measurements can be highly subjective, and it is possible that other professionals applying reasonable judgment to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support a range of alternative estimated amounts.

The transaction accounting adjustments represent management’s estimates based on information available as of the date of the filing of the condensed combined financial information and do not reflect possible adjustments related to restructuring or integration activities that have yet to be determined.

The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information was prepared using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805 and are based on certain currently available information and certain assumptions and methodologies that Spartan believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The unaudited condensed transaction accounting adjustments, which are described in the accompanying notes, may be revised as additional information becomes available. Therefore, it is likely that the actual adjustments will differ from the transaction accounting adjustments and it is possible the difference may be material. Sunlight believes that its assumptions and methodologies provide a reasonable basis for presenting all of the significant effects of the Business Combination based on information available to management at this time and that the transaction accounting adjustments give appropriate effect to those assumptions and are properly applied in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.

The historical financial statements have been adjusted in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information to reflect transaction accounting adjustments in connection with the Business Combination. Transaction costs incurred in connection with the IPO and the PIPE Financing are reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as a reduction to additional paid-in capital (“APIC”) and a decrease to cash, whereas transaction costs incurred in connection with the Business Combination are expensed. See Note 3(d), 3(e) and 4(e) for a discussion of transaction costs. Sunlight is currently negotiating certain employment agreements and new equity incentive plans for the combined company. Based on the preliminary terms, these agreements may result in an increase in compensation cost on a pro forma basis. However, as these employment agreements and new equity incentive plans are still preliminary and not yet executed, Sunlight has not included a transaction accounting adjustment.

The pro forma basic and diluted loss per share amounts presented in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations are based upon the number of shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding, assuming the Business Combination and related transactions occurred on January 1, 2020.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Note 2 — Description of the Business Combination

Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, the Blocker Holders, LTIP Unitholders and Flow-Through Sellers (collectively, the “Sellers,”) received a combination of cash, rights under the Tax Receivable Agreement, Class A Common Stock and non-economic voting Class C Common Stock in Sunlight Financial Holdings. Following the consummation of the Business Combination, the combined company is structured as an “Up-C”, whereby the Flow-Through Sellers will own equity in Sunlight through the Sunlight Class EX Units and hold direct voting rights in Sunlight Financial Holdings through Class C Common Stock.

In connection with the Closing, Sunlight Financial Holdings entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement with the TRA Holders and the Agent (as defined therein). The Tax Receivable Agreement generally provides for the payment by Sunlight Financial Holdings to the Agent, for disbursement to the TRA Holders, on a pro rata basis, of 85% of the net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income and franchise tax that Sunlight Financial Holdings actually realizes (or is deemed to realize in certain circumstances) in periods after the Business Combination as a result of (i) certain increases in tax basis that occur as a result of Sunlight Financial Holdings’ acquisition (or deemed acquisition for U.S. federal income tax purposes) of all or a portion of a holder’s Sunlight Class EX Units upon the exercise of the redemption or call rights set forth in the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement and (ii) imputed interest deemed to be paid by Sunlight Financial Holdings as a result of, and additional tax basis arising from, any payments Sunlight Financial Holdings makes under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Under the Tax Receivable Agreement, Sunlight Financial Holdings will retain the benefit of the remainder of the actual net cash savings, if any.

The amount of the cash payments that Sunlight Financial Holdings may be required to make under the Tax Receivable Agreement could be significant and is dependent upon future events and assumptions, including the timing of the redemptions of Sunlight Class EX Units, the price of the Class A Common Stock at the time of each redemption, the extent to which such redemptions are taxable transactions, the amount of the redeeming unitholder’s tax basis in its Sunlight Class EX Units at the time of the relevant redemption, the depreciation and amortization periods that apply to the increase in tax basis, the amount, character and timing of taxable income Sunlight Financial Holdings generates in the future, the U.S. federal income tax rate then applicable and the portion of Sunlight Financial Holdings’ payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement that constitute imputed interest or give rise to depreciable or amortizable tax basis.

Given the future payment obligations pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement, absent an early termination (including upon a change of control), which will not arise until after the holders of Sunlight Class EX Units redeem their Sunlight Class EX Units for Class A Common Stock (or cash) after the Business Combination, and that the amount of such payments is subject to a significant uncertainty as of the Closing, for the purpose of preparation of Article 11 pro forma financial information, no initial Tax Receivable Agreement liability is recognized upon the consummation of the Business Combination. However, if all of the Class EX Units were redeemed immediately upon consummation of the Business Combination, we would have recognized a change in deferred tax balances of approximately $134.2 million and a liability of approximately $114.1 million assuming (i) that the holders of Class EX Units redeemed all of their Class EX Units immediately after the completion of the Business Combination at the assumed price of $9.46 per share of our Class A Common Stock (ii) no material changes in relevant tax law, (iii) a constant corporate tax rate of 25.2%, and (iv) that we earn sufficient taxable income in each year to realize on a current basis all tax benefits that are subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement. These amounts are estimates and have been prepared for informational purposes only. The actual amount of deferred tax assets and related liabilities that we will recognize will differ based on, among other things, the timing of the redemptions, the price of our shares of Class A Common Stock at the time of the redemption, and the tax rates then in effect.

Note 3 — Adjustments to Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet

Explanations of the adjustments to the pro forma balance sheet are as follows:

Reflects the reclassification of $345.0 million of investments held in the Trust Account that become available for transaction consideration, transaction expenses, underwriting commission, redemption of Spartan public shares, and the operating activities of Spartan following the Business

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Combination, and $192.3 million withdrawal of funds from the Trust Account to fund the redemption of 19.2 million shares of Class A Common Stock at approximately $10.00 per share.

Reflects the gross cash proceeds of $250.0 million generated from the PIPE Financing through the issuance of 25.0 million shares of Class A Common Stock to the private investors. Of the $250.0 million, $2.5 thousand is recorded under Class A common stock at par and the remaining is recorded under APIC.

Reflects the payment of $311.0 million of cash to the Sellers in connection with the Business Combination.

Reflects the payment of $19.2 million of transaction costs incurred and accrued by Spartan. Of that amount, $12.1 million relates to the cash settlement of deferred underwriting expenses payable incurred as part of the IPO to be paid upon the consummation of a Business Combination. $5.3 million relates to the cash settlement of Spartan’s accrued advisory fees in connection with the IPO and $1.8 million relates to cash settlement of Spartan’s due to related party.

Reflects the payment of $25.7 million of transaction costs incurred by Spartan and Sunlight upon consummation of the Business Combination. Of that amount, $7.5 million relates to equity financing fees associated with the PIPE Financing, which will be offset against APIC. The remaining $18.2 million of transaction costs incurred6 upon Closing including direct and incremental costs in connection with the Business Combination, such as legal, third party advisory, investment banking, and other miscellaneous fees will be expensed. Refer to Note 4(e) for a discussion of transaction costs to be expensed in connection with the Business Combination.

Reflects the cash settlement of Sunlight’s due from affiliates and due to affiliates upon Closing. The net cash effect is an increase of $1.1 million.

Represents the purchase price allocation adjustments resulting from the Business Combination. The preliminary allocation to assets and liabilities is based on estimates, assumptions, valuations, and other studies which have not progressed to a stage where there is sufficient information to make a definitive calculation. Accordingly, the purchase price allocation reflected in the unaudited transaction accounting adjustments will remain preliminary until Spartan determines the final purchase price and the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The final determination of the purchase price and related allocation is anticipated to be completed as soon as practicable after the completion of the merger. Potential differences may include, but are not limited to, changes in allocation to intangible assets and change in fair value of financing receivable, deferred tax liability, and property and equipment.

The following is a preliminary estimate of the fair value of consideration transferred and a preliminary purchase price allocation in connection with the Business Combination.

(dollars in thousands)
Equity consideration paid to Blocker Holders in Class A Common Stock, net of $2.8 million post combination expense	$	364,439
Cash consideration to Sellers, net of $1.0 million post combination expense		306,458
Total purchase consideration	$	670,897
Cash and cash equivalents	$	62,521
Restricted cash		3,861
Advances		40,768
Other assets		4,340
Financing receivables		5,100
Property and equipment, net		1,244
Due from affiliates		1,839
Intangible assets, net		407,600
Goodwill		703,678

Of the $18.2 million, $6.5 million was accrued by Sunlight as of June 30, 2021.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(dollars in thousands)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(18,873)
Funding commitments		(22,164)
Debt		(20,613)
Deferred tax liability		(42,846)
Due to affiliates		(761)
Other liabilities		(1,076)
Warrants, at fair value		(9,708)
Fair value of noncontrolling interests		(444,013)
Fair value of the net assets acquired	$	670,897

Intangible Assets — The following describes intangible assets that may be identified that met either the separability criterion or the contractual-legal criterion described in ASC 805, and the anticipated valuation approach. The installer relationships intangible asset represents the existing installer relationships of Sunlight that may be estimated by applying a multi-period excess earnings methodology. The capital provider relationships represent existing relationships with the banks that may be estimated by applying a with-and-without methodology. The developed technology intangible asset represents technology developed by Sunlight for the purpose of generating income for Sunlight, and is valued using a replacement cost method. The trademark and trade name intangible assets represent the trade names that Sunlight originated or acquired that may be valued using a relief-from-royalty method.

Intangible assets	Fair value at 7/9/2021			Useful life (yrs.)
Fair Value of installer relationships		$	350,000		11.5
Fair Value of capital provider partnerships			43,000		0.8
Fair Value of trademarks/trade names			7,900		10.0
Fair Value of developed technology			6,700		5.0
Total		$	407,600

Goodwill — Approximately $703.7 million has been allocated to goodwill. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the gross consideration transferred over the estimated fair value of the underlying net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill represents future economic benefits arising from acquiring Sunlight primarily due to its strong market position and its assembled workforce that are not individually identified and separately recognized as intangible assets. In accordance with ASC Topic 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets related to certain acquired brands will not be amortized, but instead will be tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if certain indicators are present. In the event management of the combined company determines that the value of goodwill and/or indefinite/finite lived intangible assets has become impaired, an accounting charge for impairment during the quarter in which the determination is made may be recognized.

Reflects the elimination of Sunlight Warrants of $9.7 million either exercised or reclassified to equity upon Closing.

Reflects the future tax liability created on the transaction primarily related to the deferred tax liability on the book versus tax basis of Sunlight.

Represents the reclassification of $270.4 million of Class A Common Stock subject to possible redemption to permanent equity.

Reflects the reclassification of Sunlight’s historical temporary equity to APIC.

Reflects the issuance of 38.4 million shares of Class A Common Stock to Blocker Holders, LTIP Unitholders and holders of Sunlight Warrants and 46.9 million shares of Class C Common Stock to Unblocked Sunlight Unitholders at $0.0001 par value as consideration for the Business Combination.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reflects the reclassification of $1.0 thousand par value of Spartan Class B Common Stock to Class A Common Stock at par value to account for the conversion of 7.4 million shares of Class B Common Stock to Class A Common Stock.

Represents the elimination of $850.6 million of Sunlight’s historical accumulative deficit.

Represents the transaction accounting adjustment to record noncontrolling interest in Sunlight of $444.0 million.

Note 4 — Adjustments to Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations

Explanations of the transaction accounting adjustments to the pro forma statement of operations are as follows:

Represents additional depreciation and amortization expenses of $16.3 million and $75.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and year ended December 31, 2020, respectively, resulting from the following newly acquired intangible assets. Amount also represents the elimination of $1.4 million and $2.9 million of historical depreciation and amortization related to internally developed software for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and year ended December 31, 2020, respectively, which were fair valued under developed technology. This transaction accounting adjustment has been proposed assuming the Business Combination occurred on January 1, 2020.

Intangible assets	Fair value at 7/9/2021			Useful life (yrs.)		Amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2021			Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2020
Fair Value of installer relationships		$	350,000		11.5		$	15,217		$	30,435
Fair Value of capital provider partnerships			43,000		0.8			—			43,000
Fair Value of trademarks/trade names			7,900		10.0			395			790
Fair Value of developed technology			6,700		5.0			670			1,340
Total		$	407,600				$	16,282		$	75,565

Represents adjustments to interest income related to Sunlight Financial Holdings’ new amortized cost basis due to the fair value adjustment made to its financing receivables.

Reflects the elimination of the changes in fair value of warrants of $4.1 million and $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and for the year ended December 31, 2020, respectively, given the exercise or reclassification of Sunlight Warrants at Closing.

Represents the elimination of $0.08 million and $0.01 million of interest income and net gains on Spartan’s Trust Account for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and for the year ended December 31, 2020, respectively.

Reflects $18.2 million transaction-related costs incurred by Sunlight and Spartan post December 31, 2021 in connection with the Business Combination as if the transaction was consummated on January 1, 2020.

Represents the income tax effect of the transaction accounting adjustments calculated using a blended statutory income tax rate of 25.2% applied to the loss before income tax benefit applicable to the controlling interest. The effective tax rate of the combined company could be significantly different as the legal entity structure and activities of the combined company are integrated. The pro forma combined provision for income taxes does not necessarily reflect the amounts that would have resulted had Spartan and Sunlight filed consolidated income tax returns during the period presented.

Represents noncontrolling interest in Sunlight Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest is $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, and $32.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Note 5 — Pro Forma Loss per Share Information

As a result of the Business Combination, both the pro forma basic and diluted number of shares are reflective of 86.1 million shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding.

The calculation excludes warrants and contingently issuable shares that would be considered anti-dilutive to pro forma loss per share calculation, including (i) 17.3 million redeemable warrants to purchase Class A Common Stock of Spartan offered by Spartan in its IPO; (ii) 9.9 million warrants to purchase Class A Common Stock of Spartan that were issued to the Sponsor concurrently with the IPO; (iii) 46.9 million Class EX Units owned by the Flow-Through Sellers that are redeemable (together with a corresponding number of shares of voting, non-economic Class C Common Stock) for Class A Common Stock; (iv) and 0.1 million warrants to purchase Class EX Units and Class C Common Stock, which are mandatorily exchanged into Class A Common Stock of Sunlight Financial Holdings once exercised.

($ in thousands, except per share data)	For the six months ended June 30, 2021			For the year ended December 31, 2020
Pro forma net loss attributable to Sunlight Financial Holdings – basic and diluted	$(7,633)			$(43,681)
Pro forma weighted average Class A Common Stock outstanding – basic and diluted			86,083			86,083
Pro forma loss per share – basic and diluted		$	(0.09)		$	(0.51)
Pro forma weighted average Class A Common Stock outstanding – basic and diluted
Spartan public stockholders			15,273			15,273
Sponsors and related parties			7,437			7,437
Sunlight stockholders			38,373			38,373
Third party PIPE investors			25,000			25,000
Pro forma weighted average Class A Common Stock outstanding – basic and diluted			86,083			86,083

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of Sunlight’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read in conjunction with Sunlight LLC’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. The discussion and analysis should also be read together with the pro forma financial information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020 and the six-months ended June 30, 2021. This discussion contains forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under the heading “Risk Factors.” Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

Business Overview

Sunlight is a business-to-business-to-consumer, technology-enabled point-of-sale (POS) financing platform that provides residential solar and home improvement contractors the ability to offer seamless POS financing to their customers when purchasing residential solar systems or other home improvements. The resulting loans are funded by Sunlight’s network of capital providers who, by partnering with Sunlight, gain access to a difficult-to-reach loan market, best-in-class consumer credit underwriting, and attractive risk adjusted returns. These loans are facilitated by Sunlight’s proprietary technology platform, Orange®, through which Sunlight offers instant credit decisions to homeowners nationwide at the POS on behalf of Sunlight’s various capital providers. Since Sunlight’s founding in 2014 through June 30, 2021, Sunlight has facilitated over $4.8 billion of loans through the Sunlight Platform in partnership with over 1,500 contractor relationships.

Sunlight’s success is fueled by its strong and intentional culture based on core values such as honesty, fairness, and scrappiness. Sunlight’s culture encourages Sunlight teammates to work collaboratively with Sunlight’s contractor and capital provider partners, and the consumers they serve, to find the right result to business challenges and to deliver white-glove service. Also core to Sunlight’s values is a passion for Sunlight’s business and the societal benefits that the business funds. To date, Sunlight has facilitated loans to more than 137,000 homeowners who, as a result, have had the opportunity to save money on their utility bills and choose renewable energy over carbon-producing traditional sources of power. As of June 30, 2021, residential solar systems and energy-efficient home improvement products, facilitated through Sunlight financings, have eliminated an estimated 13.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Sunlight has also executed the United Nations Climate Neutral Now Pledge, and its business was certified as carbon neutral for its fiscal year 2020. Sunlight will continue to pursue certification for carbon neutrality in the future.

Sunlight’s core business is facilitating loans made by Sunlight’s various capital providers to the consumer customers of residential solar contractors. Sales of Sunlight-facilitated loan products are made by contractors in the context of selling residential solar systems to consumers, allowing homeowners to go solar with no money down, and in most cases, immediately saving money on their utility bills and often saving a significant amount of money over the life of their solar system. While only approximately 20% of residential solar system sales were financed with solar loans in 2015, an estimated 63% of residential solar loan sales were financed with solar loans in 2020. Solar loans made to finance residential solar systems through Sunlight’s Platform are made exclusively to homeowners. Sunlight believes that homeowners generally have better credit characteristics than other consumer groups. As of June 30, 2021, the average FICO score of all solar borrowers financed through Sunlight’s Platform is 747. Both the generally strong credit profile of solar loan borrowers and attractive risk-adjusted returns on solar loans to capital providers have enabled Sunlight to build a diversified network of capital providers to fund the solar loans facilitated by Sunlight’s Platform.

Loan providers in the residential solar industry compete primarily on process (customer and contractor experience), pricing and products. Orange® offers contractors robust tools to sell more solar systems and home improvements and homeowners a fast, fully-digital and frictionless experience. Because Sunlight has diverse funding sources, Sunlight is able to offer a large suite of competitive loan products that include multiple loan structures and combinations of interest rates and tenors.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sunlight’s revenue is primarily from platform fees earned on each solar and home improvement loan facilitated through Orange®. The platform fee is generally equal to the margin between the contractor fee charged to the contractor by Sunlight for each loan facilitated through Orange® and the discount at which Sunlight’s capital provider either funds or purchases such loan (as described in more detail below). The best-in-class credit quality of Sunlight-facilitated loans attracts diverse and attractively-priced capital (the “price” to Sunlight being the amount that a capital provider will pay to originate or purchase a Sunlight-facilitated loan), ensuring that Sunlight can offer competitive pricing to its network of contractors while still earning attractive margins. Sunlight’s business model is asset light and therefore Sunlight has minimal consumer credit risk. Sunlight does not earn material revenue from loans maintained on its balance sheet.

Executive Overview

Sunlight’s revenue is primarily attributable to platform fees earned by Sunlight for facilitating the origination of solar and home improvement loans by its capital providers. Sunlight believes that revenue and resulting Adjusted EBITDA will increase over time as the solar and home improvement markets grow organically, as Sunlight adds solar and home improvement contractors to its network, and as Sunlight continues to expand its relationship with its existing contractor partners.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2020

•

Sunlight facilitated the origination of $666.2 million of loans during the three months ended June 30, 2021, representing an increase of 199.7% from $222.3 million of loans during the three months ended June 30, 2020.

•

Revenue was $26.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021, representing an increase of 156.9% from $10.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020.

•

Net income was $5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021, representing an increase from $(1.2) million for the three months ended June 30, 2020.

•

Adjusted EBITDA was $11.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021, representing an increase of 5,077.9% from $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

•

Sunlight facilitated the origination of $1.2 billion of loans during the six months ended June 30, 2021 , representing an increase of 164.3% from $471.9 million of loans during the six months ended June 30, 2020.

•

Revenue was $51.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, representing an increase of 119.1% from $23.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020.

•

Net income was $7.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, representing an increase from $(0.7) million for the six months ended June 30, 2020.

•

Adjusted EBITDA was $23.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, representing an increase of 817.2% from $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Adjusted EBITDA

Information regarding use of Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most comparable GAAP measure, is included in “— Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” The following charts depict adjusted EBITDA and other key performance measures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):

[MISSING IMAGE: TM2123257D4-BC_EBITDA4CLR.JPG]

[MISSING IMAGE: TM2123257D4-BC_HIGH4CLR.JPG]

Highlights

In the three months ended June 30, 2021, Sunlight continued to experience strong growth including:

•

Borrower counts increased to a new quarterly high of 18,572, more than doubling from 6,894 borrowers in the second quarter of 2020

•

New contractor relationships grew 77% relative to the second quarter of 2020, with 46 new solar contractors and 138 new home improvement contractors joining the Sunlight platform in the second quarter of 2021

•

Battery attachment rate of 26%, triple the rate of just under 9% in the prior-year period

•

Average loan balance increased 11% year-over-year to $35,870, with solar loans averaging $39,852 in the second quarter of 2021

•

As of June 30, 2021, Sunlight had a cumulative funded loan total of $4.8 billion, and is poised to surpass $5 billion in cumulative funded loans in the third quarter of 2021.

On August 5, 2021, Sunlight announced innovative and competitive new loan products for residential solar and energy storage systems that provide additional term and pricing options for contractors to enable cost-saving installations for homeowners.

Key Performance Measures

Sunlight reviews several key performance measures, discussed below, to evaluate its business and results, measure performance, identify trends, formulate plans and make strategic decisions. Sunlight believes that the presentation of such metrics is useful to its investors and counterparties because they are used to measure and model the performance of companies such as Sunlight using similar metrics.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table sets forth key performance measures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands, except percentages):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						Percentage Change		For the Six Months Ended June 30,						Percentage Change
	2021			2020			Percentage Change		2021			2020			Percentage Change
Funded Loans		$	666,177		$	222,305		199.7%		$	1,247,236		$	471,947		164.3%
Direct Channel Funded Loans			506,993			166,148		205.1			1,003,539			315,881		217.7
Indirect Channel Funded Loans			159,184			56,157		183.5			243,697			156,066		56.1
Platform Fee Loans			651,311			213,007		205.8			1,273,951			468,643		171.8
Direct Channel Platform Fee Loans			506,993			166,148		205.1			1,003,539			315,881		217.7
Indirect Channel Platform Fee Loans			144,318			46,859		208.0			270,412			152,762		77.0
Revenue			26,203			10,199		156.9			50,990			23,272		119.1
Net Income (Loss)			5,243			(1,154)		n.m.			7,903			(701)		n.m.
Adjusted EBITDA			11,495			222		5,077.9			22,986			2,506		817.2

Funded Loans. Sunlight refers to the aggregate principal balance of the loans facilitated through Orange®, and funded by Sunlight’s capital providers, during a given period, as “funded loans.” Direct channel capital providers fund Sunlight-facilitated solar or home improvement loans one-by-one directly onto their balance sheet via Orange®. Sunlight’s direct channel capital providers are depository institutions with the power and authority to originate loans such as banks and credit unions. In the indirect channel, Sunlight’s solar loan allocation engine directs the solar loans to be funded on the balance sheet of Sunlight’s intermediary bank partner. These loans are aggregated, pooled and sold to indirect channel capital providers that cannot, or do not wish to, directly originate solar loans. The indirect channel capital provider relationship allows Sunlight to access a broader range of capital, which may include, among others, credit funds, insurance companies and pension funds. The home improvements line of business represents an immaterial portion of the funded loans.

Platform Fee Loans. Indicates loans facilitated by Sunlight on which it earns platform fees in a given period (as described further under “Revenue” below).

Revenue. Sunlight earns revenue in two primary streams: platform fees earned on funded loans, as described above, and fees for loan monitoring and administration services. For loans originated through Sunlight’s direct channel, Sunlight earns platform fees when the direct channel capital provider funds a particular loan and, for loans originated through Sunlight’s indirect channel, Sunlight earns platform fees when the indirect channel capital provider purchases a particular loan from Sunlight’s bank partner. Fees earned by Sunlight for loan monitoring and administration services are paid to Sunlight by the capital providers for which such services are performed on a monthly basis or such other period as the parties agree.

Net Income. Net income is a financial measure used to measure Sunlight’s performance from period-to-period on a consistent basis.

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure used by Sunlight’s management to evaluate operating performance, generate future operating plans and make strategic decisions, including those relating to operating expenses and the allocation of internal resources. Please see “— Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a further description of the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income.

Loan Characteristics

The following table sets forth the average characteristics of loans Sunlight facilitated for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 (USD in thousands):

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
Average Loan Characteristic	2021			2020			2021			2020
Solar
Loan Term (in months)			237			228			236			222
Customer Interest Rate			2.5%			3.9%			2.4%			4.0%
Customer FICO Score			750			740			750			742
Loan Balance		$	40		$	35		$	40		$	34
Home Improvement
Loan Term (in months)			116			107			116			109
Customer Interest Rate			9.8%			10.3%			9.7%			9.8%
Customer FICO Score			755			750			756			751
Loan Balance		$	16		$	13		$	16		$	14

Recent Developments

Coronavirus Outbreak. During the first quarter of 2020, Sunlight experienced strong continued growth in funded loan volume, which was a continuation of the rapid growth experienced in fiscal year 2019. The onset of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic beginning in March 2020 led to a 3% decline in the number of credit approvals and a 15% decline in volume of loans funded during the second quarter of 2020 compared to the second quarter of 2019. However, the number of credit approvals and funded loan volumes largely recovered in the third quarter of 2020 to exceed the levels experienced during the third quarter of 2019. During the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, Sunlight funded $0.7 billion and $0.2 billion of new loans, respectively, and $1.2 billion and $0.5 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, which resulted in the cumulative funded loan volume since inception of approximately $4.8 billion as of June 30, 2021.

On July 9, 2021 (the “Closing Date”), Spartan Acquisition Corp. II (NYSE: SPRQ) (“Spartan”) and Sunlight consummated the previously announced merger (“Business Combination”) pursuant to that certain Business Combination Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of January 23, 2021 (the “Business Combination Agreement”),

On the Closing Date, and in connection with the Closing, Spartan changed its name to Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. The resulting company is organized in an “Up-C” structure, such that all of the material assets of the combined company are held by, and substantially all of Sunlight’s business operations are conducted by, Sunlight, and the only material asset of Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. (together with its wholly owned subsidiaries) will be its indirect equity interests in Sunlight. On the Closing Date, Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. (a) indirectly owned 86,373,596 Class X Units of Sunlight, constituting 100% of the issued and outstanding Class X Units and approximately 64.1% of Sunlight’s outstanding equity and (b) controls Sunlight as one of the wholly-owned subsidiaries of Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc.is the sole managing member of Sunlight pursuant to the amendment and restatement of Sunlight partnership agreement.

At the closing of the Business Combination, Sunlight had an additional $49.5 million cash on hand from the proceeds of the transaction, excluding cash Sunlight received to pay tax withheld from distributions to certain current and former employees.

Key Factors Affecting Operating Results

Sunlight’s future operating results and cash flows are dependent upon a number of opportunities, challenges, and other factors, including (i) growth in the number of loans funded to the customers of each contractor; (ii) the availability of capital to fund the loan products offered by Sunlight and desired by the markets in which Sunlight participates and on economic terms favorable to Sunlight: (iii) funded loan volume; (iv) competition in the markets in which Sunlight operates; (v) the cost of traditional and other alternative sources of power to consumers and industry trends and general economic conditions; (vi) growth

TABLE OF CONTENTS

in the number of contractors included in Sunlight’s network and (vii) concentration among Sunlight’s contractor partners and capital provider partners.

Growth in the Number of Contractors and in the Number of Loans Funded for the Customers of each Contractor

Sunlight’s expansive network of more than 1,500 residential solar and other home improvement contractors, supported by a differentiated set of tools and services offered through Orange® and by Sunlight more generally, constitutes the distribution channel through which Sunlight builds funded loan volume and earns fee income. Sunlight believes that continued growth in the number of contractors in Sunlight’s network, and growth in the number of loans funded to the customers of each such contractor, have been and will continue to be key components of Sunlight’s increased market penetration, growth in funded loan volume and Sunlight’s operating results.

Availability of Capital to Fund Loans; Funded Loan Volume

Sunlight’s business model is heavily dependent on connecting its capital providers, who wish to build a portfolio of residential solar or home improvement loans, to the homeowner customers of the contractors in Sunlight’s distribution network, who wish to finance the purchase of residential solar systems or home improvements. Sunlight earns a platform fee on each solar and home improvement funded loan facilitated through Orange®. Sunlight’s ability to continue to increase its funding capacity either by adding additional capital providers or by increasing the commitments of its existing capital providers to fund loans on terms desired by the solar and/or home improvement markets and on terms that are economically favorable to Sunlight is a critical factor in Sunlight’s ability to increase funded loan volume, which is a critical factor in Sunlight’s operating results.

Competition

Competition for Sunlight occurs at two levels: (i) competition to acquire and maintain contractor relationships; and (ii) competition to acquire high quality capital to fund loans, in each case on economic terms favorable to Sunlight.

Competition to Acquire and Maintain Contractor Relationships

Competition to obtain contractor relationships is significant. Contractors generally do not enter exclusive relationships with residential solar loan providers and Sunlight’s agreements with its network of contractors generally do not provide for exclusive relationships. Contractors may offer loan products from Sunlight, as well as from Sunlight’s competitors, and generally select between loan providers based on pricing (original issue discount charged), consumer credit approval rates, variety of loan products to address shifting consumer demands and market conditions, ease of loan application and completion process (platform) and other services to facilitate the contractor’s business).

Sunlight believes that the following factors, among others, are key to Sunlight’s success in acquiring and maintaining contractor relationships:

•

Superior value proposition for contractors. Sunlight’s large array of loan products and flexibility in offering new and additional products stem from the depth, diversity and attractively-priced funding of Sunlight’s capital providers. Sunlight loan products allow contractors to capture additional purchase opportunities from consumers that do not want to or are not able to pay cash for solar system installation or do not want to lease a system from a third party and forego the benefits of ownership. Sunlight’s attractive loan products and competitive contractor fees allow contractors to choose products that fit their business needs and the financing needs of their customers. The broad range of products offered by Sunlight improves the contractor’s chances of meeting its customers’ financing needs and completing a sale.

•

Easy-to-use technology-enabled POS financing platform, instant credit decisioning. Orange® is easy to use and provides instant credit decisions for homeowners interested in financing the purchase of a residential solar system or home improvement. Access to prompt credit decisions and the ability to close financing transactions through an intuitive and easy process through the execution of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

loan agreements in one encounter with a potential customer provides significant additional sale opportunities for contractors. Orange® may be accessed via the Orange® web address, directly from certain contractor’s own website via a flexible application programming interface, or API, and via Sunlight’s mobile App. Besides instant credit decisioning, Orange® includes automated loan stipulation, secure document upload, e-sign capacity and other features that facilitate efficient loan transactions and provide contractors with the ability to grow their businesses.

•

Additional features and services offered by Sunlight further support the growth of contractor businesses, attract new contractors to Sunlight’s network and build contractor loyalty. Sunlight prioritizes innovation in Orange® and services that support growth in the businesses of its existing network of contractors, attract new contractors and build contractor loyalty. Examples of such innovations include Sunlight’s short-term advance program, Sunlight’s launch of Spanish-language loan products and Sunlight Rewards™. Sunlight believes that it has innovated more quickly than its competitors and offers contractors a greater array of valuable services that drive their determination to offer their customers Sunlight-offered loan products over those of Sunlight’s competitors and that Sunlight will continue to be able to innovate quickly to meet the needs of its contractor network.

Competition to Acquire Capital to Fund Loans

The solar system and home improvement loan markets are relatively fragmented. Facilitating the aggregation of loan volume from these markets is a highly competitive sector of these broader industries. Sunlight faces competition from a diverse landscape of consumer lenders, including traditional banks, credit unions, and specialized solar system lenders and lease providers. Sunlight’s competitors source capital from a mix of alternative sources, including depository capital and/or other alternatives that rely on the capital markets.

Sunlight believes that it offers capital providers an attractive value proposition due to its industry-leading consumer credit underwriting, attractive risk-adjusted returns earned by its capital providers relative to other asset classes, the access that Sunlight’s Platform provides to a unique and growing asset class that may reduce volatility in the ability to deploy capital, and the ability to access new customers for very little cost. Sunlight has successfully added capital providers and grown commitments from existing capital providers since inception. As its contractor network has grown, Sunlight has consistently diversified its capital provider base to ensure that it has sufficient capital to fund the demand for Sunlight facilitated loans and that it is able to offer an evolving competitive mix of loan products to meet contractor and consumer demand. Capital providers have actively participated in this success and Sunlight has not experienced any capital provider attrition since inception, although one capital provider recently provided notice to Sunlight that it had exceeded its internal asset concentration levels for solar loans and, accordingly, such capital provider terminated their program agreement with Sunlight as of April 2021. This capital provider purchased an immaterial portion (less than 2.2%) of Sunlight’s total facilitated solar loans in 2020. Sunlight believes that there are many institutions seeking to deploy capital into solar and home improvement loan assets, but Sunlight intends to continue to be selective about adding capital provider partners. Sunlight values diversification but will specifically focus on partnering with potential capital providers that can enable Sunlight to meet strategic goals, including access to the most attractive pricing and access to capacity for a growing suite of loan products, among others.

Industry Trends and General Economic Conditions; Cost of Power

Sunlight’s results of operations in the past have been fairly resilient to economic downturns but in the future may be impacted by the relative strength of the overall economy and its effect on unemployment, consumer spending and consumer demand for solar systems and home improvements. As general economic conditions improve or deteriorate, the amount of disposable income consumers have access to tends to fluctuate, which in turn impacts consumer spending levels and the willingness of consumers to take out loans to finance purchases. Specific economic factors such as interest rate levels, changes in monetary, fiscal and related policies, market volatility, consumer confidence, the impact of the pandemic crisis and, particularly, the unemployment rate also influence consumer spending and borrowing patterns.

Sunlight’s results of operations are also dependent upon continued growth in the residential solar market and the continued penetration of residential solar across the country. Growth in the solar market is

TABLE OF CONTENTS

attributable to several factors including, among others, savings available to consumers as compared with the cost of traditional sources of power or other forms of clean or alternative power and the opportunity to participate in the world-wide effort of reducing carbons in the atmosphere, or “going green.” The cost to homeowners to install solar is impacted by many factors, including the cost of materials, the cost of labor, to the extent financed, prevailing interest rates and the availability of federal, state and local incentives.

Specifically, future results of operations may be impacted by the potential discontinuation or material reduction or other change in the federal solar tax credit (the “ITC”). The ITC currently allows a qualifying homeowner to deduct 26% of the cost of installing residential solar systems from their U.S. federal income taxes, thereby returning a material portion of the purchase price of the residential solar system to homeowners. Congress has extended the ITC expiration date multiple times including, most recently, in December 2020. Under the terms of the current extension, the ITC will remain at 26% through the end of 2022, reduce to 22% for 2023, and further reduce to 0.0% after the end of 2023 for residential solar systems, unless it is extended before that time. Although the ITC has been extended several times, there is no guarantee that it will be extended beyond 2023.

Though the residential solar market has grown steadily over the last several years, Sunlight cannot guarantee that such growth will continue. In addition, although the home improvement business is not currently a material part of Sunlight’s business, Sunlight believes that it is well-positioned to grow that business significantly over time. The home improvement industry is, however, subject to many of the same industry trends and challenges associated with a changing economy as the solar industry and Sunlight cannot guarantee that it will be successful in growing that business as planned.

Concentration

Sunlight’s expansive network of more than 1,500 residential solar system and other home improvement contractors, supported by a differentiated set of tools and services offered through Orange®, constitutes the distribution channel through which the Sunlight-facilitated loans made available by Sunlight’s channel of capital providers are sold to the consumer customers of those loan products. Such an expansive network enables Sunlight to build increased funded loan volume and earn increased platform fees. Sunlight partners with some of the largest contractors in the U.S., which in the aggregate sell a material portion of Sunlight’s funded loan volume through Sunlight’s network of capital providers. However, with over 1,500 contractor partners, Sunlight’s contractor network is considerably diversified. In the period from June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020, the top ten contractors in Sunlight’s network were responsible for selling 44.0% of Sunlight’s funded loan volume, and in the period from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021 that percentage decreased to 43.9%. In both of these periods, only one contractor sold loans aggregating more than 10% of Sunlight’s revenue. That contractor was responsible for selling more than 14.5% and 14.9% of Sunlight’s funded loan volume in the period from June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020 and in the period from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021, respectively. While the percentage of Sunlight’s funded loan volume sold by any contractor in Sunlight’s network varies from period to period, there is one contractor, Marc Jones Construction, L.L.C. d/b/a Sunpro Solar (“Sunpro”), that sold 13.4% and 16.7% of Sunlight’s funded loan volume during the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and 15.1% and 16.9% during the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020. Sunlight believes that its contractor network is sufficiently diversified to continue to grow with the solar markets and increase share given market dynamics, but intends to continue adding contractors to the network in order to further diversify.

Sunlight has multiple capital providers in both its direct and indirect funding channels, all of which have increased their commitments since partnering with Sunlight. Sunlight has one direct capital provider that has continued to increase its commitment year-over-year and since inception has increased its commitment by 700% of its initial commitment, making it Sunlight’s largest capital provider in the period from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021. Though Sunlight believes that the relationship with this capital provider is healthy and will continue without disruption, the significant portion of funded loan volume attributable to this capital provider results in concentration risk. Sunlight cannot guarantee that this capital provider will continue to fund loans facilitated by Sunlight in the same volume or at all beyond its current contractual commitment which expires in 2022. This capital provider funded 46.2% and 39.0% of Sunlight’s funded loans during the period from June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020 and during the period from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021, respectively. If this capital provider elects to terminate its relationship with Sunlight, then the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

capital provider is contractually required to provide Sunlight 12 months’ advance notice of termination. If Sunlight were to receive such an advance notice of termination, then Sunlight would use this period to develop alternate funding plans by utilizing existing relationships and exploring possible new capital provider relationships. While Sunlight believes that it would be able to identify and implement alternative arrangements during this period, Sunlight cannot guarantee that it would be able to do so at all or on equivalent or favorable terms. Sunlight believes that a failure to arrange alternative loan funding on equivalent terms would have less of an impact on Sunlight’s funded loan volume, as capital for the solar loan industry has historically been readily available. Rather, Sunlight believes that such failure would be more likely to have a greater negative impact on the amount of platform fees that Sunlight earns, and therefore could impact revenue.

Basis of Presentation

Sunlight conducts business through one operating segment, and Sunlight operates in one geographic region, the United States. See Notes 1 and 2 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Sunlight for more information.

Components of Results of Operations

Revenues

Revenue. Sunlight earns revenue in two primary streams: platform fees earned on each loan facilitated via Orange® and fees earned for loan monitoring and administration services.

Platform fees. Platform fee revenue, for each loan facilitated via Orange®, is generally the difference between the contractor fee that Sunlight charges to the contractors in its network for access to Orange® and the ability to offer financing options to their customers and the capital provider discount charged to Sunlight (cost of capital to Sunlight) for such loan. The platform fee percentage is equal to the dollar amount of such fee divided by the principal balance at origination of such loan. For solar system loans, platform fees are generally earned by Sunlight in the direct channel when the direct channel capital provider funds a particular loan and in the indirect channel generally when an indirect channel capital provider purchases a particular loan from Sunlight’s bank partner. The contract between Sunlight and its bank partner for home improvement loans is considered a derivative for GAAP purposes, whereas the contract between Sunlight and its bank partner for solar loans is not. For home improvement loans, Sunlight records a “realized gain on contract derivative (net)” in lieu of a platform fee generally when the loans are purchased by Sunlight’s indirect capital provider from Sunlight’s bank partner, and Sunlight is paid. As such, Sunlight excludes from its revenue any platform fee associated with a home improvement loan under Sunlight’s related home improvement agreement. Sunlight estimates the fair value of the derivative components of the bank partnership arrangement based on the present value of the net cash flows that Sunlight expects to collect under the agreement. Under this home improvement bank partnership arrangement, with respect to a given home improvement loan, Sunlight will expect to collect (x) the amount paid by Sunlight’s indirect capital provider to purchase the loan from Sunlight’s bank partner (the outstanding principal balance of the loan less the amount of the capital provider discount applied to that loan plus any accrued and unpaid interest) minus (y) the total of amounts funded to the relevant contractor in respect of the related home improvement project (total cost of the project to the consumer customer of the relevant contractor less the applicable contractor fee) and any amounts that Sunlight owes to its bank partner in the form of minimum guaranteed returns to the bank partner on the origination of such loan. The aggregate estimated fair value of this agreement is marked to market by Sunlight on a monthly basis. When a loan sale occurs, the estimated fair value associated with the loans included in the sold portfolio is reversed and Sunlight recognizes the related realized net cash as a realized gain as noted above.

Loan monitoring and administration revenue. Sunlight also earns revenue from fees charged by Sunlight for providing loan monitoring and administration services for certain of its capital providers. These services include the reporting of loan performance information, administration of servicing performed by third parties, and addressing customer concerns or complaints through Sunlight’s call center on behalf of the relevant capital provider.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Costs and Expenses

Cost of revenues. Sunlight’s cost of revenues includes the aggregate costs that Sunlight incurs to satisfy its obligations in facilitating the origination of a loan. The cost of revenues includes variable consideration that Sunlight pays for its platform fees which do not otherwise meet the criteria necessary for netting against gross revenues, including items such as credit bureau fees, the cost to check homeowners’ title in connection with the homeowner credit underwriting and the cost of certain sales incentives, among others.

Compensation and benefits. Compensation and benefits expenses represent costs related to our employees, such as salaries, bonuses, benefits and equity-based compensation expenses. Also included are any recruiting costs incurred by Sunlight in attracting talent and professional and consulting fees related to certain services that Sunlight outsources to third parties.

Selling, general, and administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses include legal, audit and other professional services fees, travel and entertainment expenses, and insurance premiums as incurred.

Property and technology. Property and technology expenses comprise rent, information technology services to support the Orange® infrastructure and operation, as well as other Sunlight technology requirements, and non-capitalizable costs to internally develop software as incurred.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense relate primarily to the amortization of internally developed software to support Orange® or otherwise developed by or on behalf of Sunlight, but also relates to the depreciation of furniture, fixtures, and equipment, computer hardware and leasehold improvements.

Provision for losses. Provision for losses expenses relate primarily to certain receivables that are held-for-investment by Sunlight that are not performing or Sunlight estimates will not perform based upon historical experience. The term relates to Sunlight’s advances program, its prefunding program, and to certain solar and home improvement loans and loan participations that Sunlight purchased from Sunlight’s capital providers pursuant to the terms of its contract with those capital providers.

Management fees to affiliate. These expenses relate to fees paid pursuant to management agreements entered into between Sunlight and certain of Sunlight’s affiliates. These management agreements terminated upon closing of the Business Combination, and Sunlight does not expect this expense to continue.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Interest income. Sunlight recognizes income on certain receivables that are held-for-investment by Sunlight, including certain solar or home improvement loans, or participations in such loans, held on the Sunlight balance sheet, in each case to the extent such receivables are performing. Sunlight accrues interest income based on the unpaid principal balance and contractual terms of such receivables, and recognizes income related to the discounts associated with such receivables as a yield adjustment using the interest method, or on a straight-line basis when it approximates the interest method, over the loan term.

Interest expense. Interest expenses represent interest payable by Sunlight on its borrowings under its Loan and Security Agreement (as defined below) and the amortization of associated deferred financing costs.

Change in fair value of warrant liabilities. The change in fair value of warrant liabilities relates to warrants issued by Sunlight to certain third parties to purchase certain of Sunlight’s member units. Such warrants are marked to market periodically and any change in value is reflected in this line item.

Change in fair value of, and realized gains on, contract derivative, net. The arrangement with Sunlight’s bank partner to originate home improvement loans is considered a derivative under US GAAP. As such, Sunlight’s revenues exclude the platform fees that Sunlight earns from the sale of home improvement loans from the bank partner’s balance sheet. Instead, Sunlight records a derivative that is marked to market on a monthly basis, with realized gains recognized on the derivative on the sale of the loan from the bank partner to an indirect channel capital provider and accounting for the impact of any changes to the applicable interest rates on the amounts payable to the bank partner in connection with any such sale.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other realized losses, net. Other realized losses primarily relate to losses Sunlight incurred in connection with certain indirect channel loans.

Other income (expense). Other income or expense primarily relate to the changes in a liability for certain guarantees of performance provided by Sunlight to Sunlight’s bank partner relating to the loans held on the balance sheet of Sunlight’s bank partner and certain other guarantees of performance made by Sunlight to certain of its capital providers with respect to specified solar loans.

Business Combination expenses. The expenses Sunlight incurs that are not considered operating expenses. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, these costs primarily represent legal and other professional costs Sunlight incurred in connection with the Business Combination.

Results of Operations

This section includes a summary of our results of operations, followed by detailed comparisons of our results for three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands, except percentages):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)					For the Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2021			2020			$			%		2021			2020			$			%
Revenue		$	26,203		$	10,199		$	16,004		156.9%		$	50,990		$	23,272		$	27,718		119.1%
Costs and Expenses
Cost of revenues (exclusive of items shown separately below)			5,337			2,300			3,037		132.0			10,191			5,247			4,944		94.2
Compensation and benefits			8,108			6,273			1,835		29.3			16,120			12,723			3,397		26.7
Selling, general, and administrative			1,204			542			662		122.1			3,120			1,822			1,298		71.2
Property and technology			1,420			1,065			355		33.3			2,628			2,048			580		28.3
Depreciation and amortization			801			815			(14)		(1.7)			1,610			1,618			(8)		(0.5)
Provision for losses			436			354			82		23.2			1,172			478			694		145.2
Management fees to affiliate			100			100			—		—			200			200			—		—
			17,406			11,449			5,957		52.0			35,041			24,136			10,905		45.2
Operating income			8,797			(1,250)			10,047		n.m.			15,949			(864)			16,813		n.m.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest income			112			119			(7)		(5.9)			253			276			(23)		(8.3)
Interest expense			(317)			(169)			(148)		87.6			(572)			(328)			(244)		74.4
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities			(1,451)			(13)			(1,438)		11,061.5			(4,065)			29			(4,094)		n.m.
Change in fair value of contract derivatives, net			69			184			(115)		(62.5)			(787)			455			(1,242)		n.m.
Realized gains on contract derivatives, net			719			89			630		707.9			2,986			121			2,865		2,367.8
Other income (expense)			209			(114)			323		n.m.			621			(390)			1,011		n.m.
Business combination expenses			(2,895)			—			(2,895)		n.m.			(6,482)			—			(6,482)		n.m.
			(3,554)			96			(3,650)		n.m.			(8,046)			163			(8,209)		n.m.
Net Income (Loss)		$	5,243		$	(1,154)		$	6,397		n.m.		$	7,903		$	(701)		$	8,604		n.m.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2020

Revenue

The following table provides the components of Sunlight’s revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands, except percentages):

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2021			2020			$			%
Direct Channel Platform Fees, net		$	21,885		$	9,582		$	12,303		128.4%
Indirect Channel Platform Fees, net			3,227			17			3,210		18,882.4
Other revenues			1,091			600			491		81.8
		$	26,203		$	10,199		$	16,004		156.9

Revenue increased by $16.0 million or 156.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2021 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2020 due to an increase of 205.8% in platform fee loans, partially offset by a decrease of 0.5% in the average platform fee percentage earned on loans funded by direct channel capital providers or purchased by indirect channel capital providers. Sunlight’s revenue excludes amounts earned through its facilitation of home improvement loan originations, which Sunlight presents as realized gains on contract derivatives.

Funded loans increased from $222.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2020 to $666.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2021, an increase of 199.7%. Sunlight believes that an increase in funded loans year-over-year is attributable primarily to both growth in the residential solar market and an increase in the number of contractors in Sunlight’s contractor network. The total number of contractors in Sunlight’s network increased from approximately 786 at June 30, 2020 to over 1,392 at June 30, 2021. The number of solar contractors in the network increased from 509 at June 30, 2020 to 746 at June 30, 2021, an increase of 46.6%. The number of home improvement contractors in the network increased from 277 at June 30, 2020 to 646 at June 30, 2021.

The average platform fee percentage earned on loans funded by direct channel capital providers or purchased by indirect channel capital providers decreased 0.5% from the three months ended June 30, 2021 to the three months ended June 30, 2020. The platform fee percentage earned by Sunlight is dependent on several factors, including (i) the contractor fees charged by Sunlight to contractors (which is impacted by competitive pressure that varies from period to period, by loan product based on consumer preferences, and by the mix of contractors in a particular period as certain contractors may generally have higher or lower contractor fees than others), (ii) the capital provider discounts charged to Sunlight by Sunlight’s capital providers (which fluctuate, among other things, based on market conditions impacting cost of capital, opportunities in other asset classes, and the mix of capital providers funding or purchasing loans in a particular period as certain capital providers may generally have higher or lower capital provider discounts than others), (iii) the mix of Sunlight loan products funded in a particular period (as certain products in that period, for reasons relating to competitive pressure for certain loan products or otherwise, may generally carry a higher or lower capital provider discount or contractor fee, than others) and (iv) other factors. Sunlight earns revenues from platform fees, which are determined by the margin between capital provider discounts charged to Sunlight and contractor fees charged by Sunlight to the contractors that sell the Sunlight facilitated loan products. Both components in the calculation of platform fees are influenced by a variety of factors, including but not limited to those described above. For example, capital providers wishing to obtain greater volume may reduce capital provider discounts charged across all products to make funding with this capital provider an attractive option to Sunlight. As well, competitive pressures or volume discounts negotiated with given contractors may reduce the contractor fees that Sunlight charges to such contractors on certain loan products or across loan products.

Sunlight believes that the difference in platform fee percentage from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021 is primarily attributable to competition in the market with regard to contractor fees, the mix of Sunlight loan products funded in the two periods (based on the recent trend towards contractor preference to offer certain longer term, lower interest rate loan products facing significant competitive pressure from other participants offering loan financing in the market and driving attractive contractor fee pricing in those periods) and an increase in capital provider discounts charged to Sunlight by capital providers in Sunlight’s indirect channel during the second quarter of 2020. Sunlight’s indirect channel capital providers are generally more reactive than direct channel capital providers to market uncertainty and interest rate market volatility as presented at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Unlike Sunlight’s direct channel capital providers, Sunlight’s indirect channel capital providers are generally not depository institutions and therefore their

TABLE OF CONTENTS

own cost of capital is subject to market uncertainty. Consequently, the capital provider discounts charged to Sunlight by such indirect channel capital providers are also likely to be more reactive. Deposits, which are generally used by Sunlight’s direct channel capital providers to fund loans, are generally more stable, less reactive to market variance and the least expensive cost of capital. The following table presents averages weighted by original loan balance of capital provider discounts, contractor fees and platform fees.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				Change in Average
	2021		2020		Change in Average
Solar Total – Capital Provider Discount		16.7%		11.1%		5.6%
Solar Total – Contractor Fee		20.7		15.6		5.1
Solar Total – Platform Fee		4.0		4.5		(0.5)
Solar Direct Channel – Capital Provider Discount		16.6		9.8		6.8
Solar Direct Channel – Contractor Fee		20.9		15.6		5.3
Solar Direct Channel – Platform Fee		4.3		5.8		(1.5)
Solar Indirect Channel – Capital Provider Discount		17.2		15.2		2.0
Solar Indirect Channel – Contractor Fee		20.2		15.0		5.2
Solar Indirect Channel – Platform Fee		3.0		(0.2)		3.2

Costs and Expenses

Cost of revenues increased by 132.0%, which is less than the 156.9% increase in revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2020. The $3.0 million increase in cost of revenues resulted from $0.6 million of increased costs of consumer credit underwriting arising from increased credit approval volumes, $0.7 million from rewards earned by salespeople under Sunlight Rewards™, $1.2 million from costs incurred in connection with the increase of funded loan volumes and Sunlight’s role in facilitating those loans, and $0.6 million of cost increases from broker fees paid to financial institutions for arranging certain loan origination or purchase arrangements with capital providers. The broker fees are calculated as a percentage of the funded loan volume originating from an applicable loan origination or purchase arrangement with a capital provider. Sunlight’s obligation to pay these broker fees generally terminates between three and five years after the date that the initial loan is originated or purchased pursuant to an arrangement facilitated by the broker.

Compensation and benefits expense increased by $1.8 million, or 29.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2020, primarily due to an increase in full-time employees from 165 at June 30, 2020 to 220 at June 30, 2021. The increase in full-time employees is consistent with the growth in Sunlight’s business year-over-year and Sunlight expects to continue hiring as its business grows in order to continue to expand its contractor network, develop its home improvement business and meet the demands of its contractors and capital providers.

Selling, general, and administrative expense increased by $0.7 million, or 122.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2020 primarily due to increased professional fees including legal, audit and tax services.

Property and technology expense increased by $0.4 million, or 33.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2020 primarily due to an increase in licensing fees charged by certain of Sunlight’s third-party service providers that support the infrastructure and operation of Orange® associated with the growth in Sunlight’s network of contractors.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $0.0 million, or 1.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2020 primarily due to the amortization of investments made in Orange® to support ongoing innovation and to automate certain other corporate processes.

Provision for loss expense increased by $0.1 million, or 23.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2020. Such increase was due primarily to an increased

TABLE OF CONTENTS

level of loan write offs. The ratio of provision for loss expense over aggregate funded bank partner loan volume in the three months ended June 30, 2020 was 0.4% as compared to 0.8% over the three months ended June 30, 2021 as a result of the write offs.

Operating margin increased materially from the three months ended June 30, 2020 to the three months ended June 30, 2021 due to the factors described above, the fixed nature of a material level of Sunlight expense and revenue generally growing materially faster than operating expenses.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Total other expenses increased $3.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2020, primarily resulting from (a) $2.9 million increase in costs incurred in connection with the Business Combination, (b) $1.4 million increase in the fair value of warrants issued by Sunlight and redeemable in its equity, treated as liabilities. These increased expenses were partially offset by (a) $0.6 million of income Sunlight realized from the arrangement with Sunlight’s bank partner to originate home improvement loans treated as a derivative under U.S. GAAP.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

Revenue

The following table provides the components of Sunlight’s revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands, except percentages):

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2021			2020			$			%
Direct Channel Platform Fees, net		$	43,731		$	18,904		$	24,827		131.3%
Indirect Channel Platform Fees, net			5,045			3,178			1,865		58.7
Other revenues			2,216			1,190			1,026		86.2
		$	50,990		$	23,272		$	27,718		119.1

Revenue increased by $27.7 million or 119.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2021 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2020 due to an increase of 171.8% in platform fee loans, partially offset by an overall 0.5% decrease in the average platform fee percentage earned on loans funded by direct channel capital providers or purchased by indirect channel capital providers. Sunlight’s revenue excludes amounts earned through its facilitation of home improvement loan originations, which Sunlight presents as realized gains on contract derivatives.

Funded loans increased from $471.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 to $1.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2020, an increase of 164.3%. Sunlight believes that the increase in funded loans year-over-year is attributable primarily to both growth in the residential solar market and an increase in the number of contractors in Sunlight’s contractor network.

The average platform fee percentage earned on loans funded by direct channel capital providers or purchased by indirect channel capital providers decreased 0.5% from the six months ended June 30, 2020 to the six months ended June 30, 2021 for the same reasons described in Sunlight’s quarter-on-quarter results of operations. The following table presents averages weighted by original loan balance of capital provider discounts, contractor fees and platform fees.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,				Change in Average
	2021		2020		Change in Average
Solar Total – Capital Provider Discount		16.6%		11.1%		5.5%
Solar Total – Contractor Fee		20.8		15.8		5.0
Solar Total – Platform Fee		4.2		4.7		(0.5)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,				Change in Average
	2021		2020		Change in Average
Solar Direct Channel – Capital Provider Discount		16.5		9.0		7.5
Solar Direct Channel – Contractor Fee		20.9		15.0		5.9
Solar Direct Channel – Platform Fee		4.4		6.0		(1.6)
Solar Indirect Channel – Capital Provider Discount		17.2		15.4		1.8
Solar Indirect Channel – Contractor Fee		20.2		17.5		2.7
Solar Indirect Channel – Platform Fee		3.0		2.1		0.9

Costs and Expenses

Cost of revenues increased by 94.2%, which is less than the 119.1% increase in revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2020. The $4.9 million increase in cost of revenues resulted from $1.1 million of increased costs of consumer credit underwriting arising from increased credit approval volumes, $1.2 million from rewards earned by salespeople under Sunlight Rewards™, $1.7 million from costs incurred in connection with the increase of funded loan volume in 2020 and Sunlight’s role in facilitating those loans, and increased costs of $0.9 million from broker fees paid to financial institutions for arranging certain loan origination or purchase arrangements with capital providers. The broker fees are calculated as a percentage of the funded loan volume originating from an applicable loan origination or purchase arrangement with a capital provider. Sunlight’s obligation to pay these broker fees generally terminates between three and five years after the date that the initial loan is originated or purchased pursuant to an arrangement facilitated by the broker.

Compensation and benefits expense increased by $3.4 million, or 26.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2020, primarily due to an increase in full-time employees from 165 at June 30, 2020 to 220 at June 30, 2021. The increase in full-time employees is consistent with the growth in Sunlight’s business and Sunlight expects to continue hiring as its business grows in order to continue to expand its contractor network, develop its home improvement business and meet the demands of its contractors and capital providers.

Selling, general, and administrative expense increased by $1.3 million, or 71.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2020 primarily due to increased professional fees including legal, audit and tax services.

Property and technology expense increased by $0.6 million, or 28.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2020 primarily due to an increase in licensing fees charged by certain of Sunlight’s third-party service providers that support the infrastructure and operation of Orange® associated with the growth in Sunlight’s network of contractors.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $0.0 million, or 0.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2020 primarily due to the amortization of investments made in Orange® to support ongoing innovation and to automate certain other corporate processes.

Provision for loss expense increased by $0.7 million, or 145.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2020. Such increase was due primarily to an increased level of funded loan volume with Sunlight’s bank partner. The ratio of provision for loss expense over aggregate funded bank partner loan volume in the six months ended June 30, 2020 was 0.7% as compared to 0.3% over the three months ended June 30, 2021, indicating an decrease in loss experience as compared to funded bank partner loan volume.

Operating margin increased materially from the six months ended June 30, 2020 to the six months ended June 30, 2021 due to the factors described above, the fixed nature of a material level of Sunlight expense and revenue generally growing materially faster than operating expenses.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other Income (Expense), Net

Total other expenses increased $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2020, primarily resulting from (a) $6.5 million increase in costs incurred in connection with the Business Combination, (b) $4.1 million increase in the fair value of warrants issued by Sunlight and redeemable in its equity, treated as liabilities, and (c) $1.2 million reversal of the change in fair value of the arrangement with Sunlight’s bank partner to originate home improvement loans treated as a derivative under U.S. GAAP. caused by an offsetting $2.9 million realized gain from the sale of those loans.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2021, Sunlight had $62.5 million of unrestricted cash on hand and had drawn $20.6 million available to it under its $30.0 million credit facility. At the closing of the Business Combination, Sunlight had an additional $49.5 million cash on hand from the proceeds of the transaction, which intends to use as working capital to finance operations and other potential needs in the business.

On April 26, 2021, Sunlight entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). The Loan and Security Agreement, which replaces Sunlight’s prior $15.0 million credit facility, has a borrowing capacity of up to $30.0 million and matures on April 26, 2023. Borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement accrue interest at a rate equal to the greater of (i) 5.0% and (ii) the prime rate plus 1.75% per annum. The Loan and Security Agreement contains certain financial covenants, including maintenance of (i) Liquidity (as defined therein) at all times in an amount equal to or greater than the greater of (a) 35% of all outstanding principal amounts of any advances and (b) $10.0 million; (ii) at all times Available Takeout Commitment Amount (as defined therein) in an amount equal to or greater than $200.0 million; and (iii) EBITDA (as defined in the Loan and Security Agreement) of at least $5.0 million for the six month period ending on the last day of each month. The Loan and Security Agreement contains customary events of default. SVB could elect to accelerate the maturity of the loans and/or terminate the commitments under the Loan and Security Agreement upon the occurrence and during the continuation of an event of default, and Sunlight could be required to repay all amounts outstanding under the Loan and Security Agreement. No defaults or events of defaults have occurred as of the date of this filing.

Sunlight’s cash requirements relate primarily to funding Sunlight advances and prefunding programs, to invest in continued innovations in Orange® and to pay Sunlight’s operating expenses, repayment of borrowings (and interest thereon), management fees, outstanding commitments and guarantees (including Sunlight’s purchase of loans pursuant to the terms of certain of its capital provider agreements and loan participations), other operating expenses, and tax distributions. Sunlight may be required to purchase loans from its bank partner after an agreed period of time if Sunlight has not arranged the sale of such loans. To date, Sunlight has not been required to purchase loans from its bank partner due to an inability to sell such loans to an indirect channel capital provider. Additionally, Sunlight assumes the risk of compliance errors and the risk of borrower or contractor fraud in the origination of the loans, and as such, Sunlight is obligated to purchase the applicable loan from its bank partner should these events occur. Sunlight has also entered into a program agreement with its bank partner to fund its home improvement loans that contains similar provisions related to risks accepted by Sunlight.

Historically, Sunlight has met its cash requirements from cash flow generated by operations, collection of short-term advances under its contractor advance funding program and in prefunding payments under its prefunding program, and draws on Sunlight’s credit facility. Sunlight believes that it will continue to generate cash flow from its operations which, together with funds available under its new credit facility and cash on hand, will be sufficient to meet its current and future liquidity needs.

Relationships with Contractors and Capital Providers

Relationships with Contractors

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ability to finance residential solar systems on terms that typically translate to immediate saving for homeowners on their utility bills and significant amounts in lifetime savings has materially contributed to the strong growth in the number of residential solar systems installed in the United States over the last five years. Sunlight attracts and builds strong relationships with residential solar system contractors of all sizes in key solar markets by prioritizing innovations in Orange® and providing services that assist the contractors in growing their own businesses. Sunlight’s team of business development and relationship management professionals provides hands-on support to these contractors. Sunlight believes that innovations such as prequalification capabilities, easy and secure document upload features, reliable next day funding and Sunlight’s short-term capital advance program (as described more fully below), amongst other innovations, both attract new contractors to Sunlight’s network and build loyalty and deepen Sunlight’s existing contractor relationships. In addition, Sunlight’s diverse set of capital providers enables Sunlight to offer its network of contractors a wide array of loan products that vary as to structure, interest rate and tenor, and thereby permits Sunlight’s network of contractors to offer competitively-priced products that best serve their markets, and all at competitive pricing. These benefits to Sunlight’s existing network of contractors translate to deeper penetration of the contractors’ sales, which is an important contributor to the growth of Sunlight’s market share and revenue. There can be no assurance that Sunlight will be able to maintain its current contractor relationships. Sunlight may lose existing contractors that represent a significant portion of Sunlight’s business, and there is no guarantee that Sunlight would be able to engage replacement contractors on terms similar to its existing contractors, or at all.

Sunlight started its business in 2014 and developed key anchor partnerships with a residential solar contractor in 2016. Beginning in 2017 and through 2018, Sunlight focused on building and diversifying its contractor relationships and continues that process today. In 2020, as compared with 2019, Sunlight grew its solar contractor base by more than 60%. However, dependence on any one contractor or small group of contractors creates concentration risk, particularly in the event that any such contractor elects to terminate its relationship with Sunlight or experiences business disruption or a business failure or bankruptcy. For example, during May 2021, Sunlight was advised by a significant contractor that it will discontinue use of the Sunlight’s platform to source solar loans effective immediately. This contractor accounted for approximately 6.7% and 11.1% of Sunlight’s total funded loan volumes during the year ended December 31, 2020 and for the six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively. Sunlight believes that its strong relationships with the existing contractors in Sunlight’s network, the continued growth in the number of contractor relationships, and the various competitive loan products and sales tools in Orange® that Sunlight can offer those contractors have been and will continue to be key components of Sunlight’s increased market penetration, growth in funded loan volume and revenue.

Relationships with Capital Providers

Sunlight’s business model is dependent on its ability to connect its capital providers, who wish to build a portfolio of residential solar system loans, to the homeowner customers of the contractors in Sunlight’s distribution network, who wish to finance the purchase of a residential solar system. Sunlight earns a platform fee on each solar and home improvement loan facilitated through Orange®. The platform fee is generally equal to the difference, or the margin, between (i) the contractor fee that Sunlight charges to contractors for access to Orange® and for making the various Sunlight-offered loan products available to such contractors and (ii) the capital provider discount charged by the relevant capital provider either funding or purchasing the loan in the direct and indirect channels, respectively (as described below). Sunlight’s business is therefore heavily dependent upon the availability of capital on attractive economic terms. Sunlight believes that it offers capital providers an attractive value proposition due to its industry-leading consumer credit underwriting, the attractive risk-adjusted returns that Sunlight’s capital providers earn relative to other asset classes, the access that Sunlight’s Platform provides to a unique and growing asset class that may reduce volatility in the ability to deploy capital, and the ability to access new customers for very little cost.

Sunlight engages with its capital providers not just as funding sources but as funding partners. As with Sunlight’s network of contractors, Sunlight works closely with its capital providers to understand and address their business needs as related to the residential solar loan industry. Matters related to loan product, credit strategy, contractor commercial underwriting and consumer protection practices are considered and designed in tandem with the goal of creating a robust and growing channel for funded loan volume. Additionally, through Orange®, Sunlight’s capital providers operating within Sunlight’s direct channel can track and

TABLE OF CONTENTS

manage the pipeline of solar loan volume allocated to that capital provider. Sunlight’s relationships with its diverse and growing network of capital providers provides significant flexibility to source competitively priced capital. Since the acquisition of Sunlight’s initial flow capital funding source in 2016, the number of capital providers funding Sunlight-facilitated solar loans has increased materially and, more importantly, all of Sunlight’s direct channel capital providers have significantly increased their commitments to fund solar loan volume.

Sunlight categorizes its capital providers as being either in Sunlight’s direct or indirect channel. Sunlight maintains both channels to provide diversification of funding sources, access to funding for different types of loan products and for other strategic purposes. The ability of Sunlight to allocate loans to various capital providers, as well as the availability of the two different funding channels, creates flexibility and allows Sunlight to respond nimbly to shifting market conditions.

Direct channel capital providers fund Sunlight-facilitated solar or home improvement loans one-by-one directly onto their balance sheet via Orange®. Sunlight’s direct channel capital providers are depository institutions with the power and authority to originate loans such as banks and credit unions. Generally, direct channel capital providers choose to service the loans they originate.

In the indirect channel, Sunlight’s solar loan allocation engine directs the solar loans to be funded on the balance sheet of Sunlight’s intermediary bank partner. These loans are aggregated, pooled and sold to indirect channel capital providers that cannot, or do not wish to, directly originate solar loans. The indirect channel capital provider relationship allows Sunlight to access a broader range of capital, which may include, among others, credit funds, insurance companies and pension funds. Indirect channel capital providers present a unique opportunity for Sunlight to access high quality and significant sources of funding that are diverse from traditional depository sources.

Cash Flow and Liquidity Analysis

Sunlight assesses liquidity primarily in terms of its ability to generate cash to fund operating and financing activities. Sunlight has generated increasing amounts of cash from operating activities, and management believes that Sunlight is in a strong financial and liquidity position. Sunlight’s cash from operating activities are generally derived from platform fees which are fully earned at the funding of a loan by direct channel capital providers and the purchase of a loan from our bank partner’s balance sheet by an indirect channel capital provider. Refer to “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and “Risk Factors” for a full description of the related estimates, assumptions, and judgments.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

The following provides a summary of cash flow data for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2021			2020
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		$	17,106		$	(10,217)
Net cash used in investing activities			(1,404)			(2,476)
Net cash used in financing activities			(2,025)			(2,821)

Cash Flow from Operating Activities

For the six months ended June 30, 2021, net cash provided by operating activities was $17.1 million. Operating cash inflows for the six months ended June 30, 2021 primarily consisted of proceeds from Sunlight’s direct channel capital providers to fund, and indirect channel capital provider to purchase, without duplication, loans of $1.0 billion, of which Sunlight paid $1.0 billion to contractors; repayment of advances and prefunds of $0.8 billion (conversely, Sunlight advanced or prefunded $0.9 billion); and net interest expense paid of $0.5 million. Operating cash outflows primarily consisted of compensation and benefits of $17.3 million, information technology expenses of $2.1 million, and management fees paid to affiliates of $0.2 million.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For the six months ended June 30, 2020, net cash used in operating activities was $10.2 million. Operating cash inflows for the six months ended June 30, 2020 primarily consisted of proceeds from Sunlight’s direct channel capital providers to fund, and indirect channel capital providers to purchase without duplication, loans of $0.4 billion, of which Sunlight paid $0.4 billion to contractors; repayment of advances and prefunds of $0.4 billion (conversely, Sunlight advanced or prefunded $0.3 billion); and net interest expense paid of $0.3 million. Operating cash outflows primarily consisted of compensation and benefits of $13.8 million, information technology expenses of $2.1 million, and management fees paid to affiliates of $0.2 million.

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

For the six months ended June 30, 2021, net cash used in investing activities was $1.4 million, consisting of cash paid to acquire loans and loan participations of $1.2 million, net of $0.8 million in cash received as return of capital thereon, and $1.1 million paid to internally develop software and acquire property and equipment. For the six months ended June 30, 2020, net cash used in investing activities was $2.5 million, consisting of cash paid to acquire loans and loan participations of $1.5 million, net of $0.6 million in cash received as return of capital thereon, and $1.6 million paid to internally develop software and acquire property and equipment.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

For the six months ended June 30, 2021, net cash used in financing activities was $2.0 million, consisting of repayments of borrowings under Sunlight’s prior credit facilities of $14.8 million, net of borrowings of $20.7 million, distributions of $7.5 million, and $0.5 million payment of debt issuance costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2020, net cash used in financing activities was $2.8 million, consisting of repayments of borrowings under Sunlight’s prior credit facilities of $5.9 million, net of borrowings of $5.1 million, and distributions of $2.0 million.

Long-Term Debt

On April 26, 2021, Sunlight entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with SVB (as defined above). The Loan and Security Agreement, which replaces Sunlight’s prior $15.0 million credit facility, has a borrowing capacity of up to $30.0 million and matures on April 26, 2023. Borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement accrue interest at a rate equal to the greater of (i) 5.0% and (ii) the prime rate plus 1.75% per annum. The Loan and Security Agreement contains certain financial covenants, including (i) liquidity in an amount equal to or greater than (a) 35% of all outstanding principal amounts of any advances and (b) $10.0 million; (ii) Available Takeout Commitment Amount (as defined therein) in an amount equal to or greater than $200.0 million; and (iii) EBITDA (as defined in the Loan and Security Agreement) of at least $5.0 million for the six month period ending on the last day of each month. The Loan and Security Agreement contains customary events of default. SVB could elect to accelerate the maturity of the loans and/or terminate the commitments under the Loan and Security Agreement upon the occurrence and during the continuation of an event of default, and Sunlight could be required to repay all amounts outstanding under the Loan and Security Agreement. No defaults or events of defaults have occurred as of the date of this filing.

Other Changes in Financial Position

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021

In addition to the changes in Sunlight’s financial position from December 31, 2020 to June 30, 2021 described in “— Results of Operations” and “— Cash Flow and Liquidity Analysis,” the following activities also occurred:

•

Restricted cash. The cash Sunlight holds subject to contractual restrictions increased by $0.7 million resulting from a $0.8 million increase in cash temporarily held by Sunlight in connection with Sunlight’s administration of loan participations on behalf of a third party.

•

Temporary equity. Sunlight’s temporary equity consisting of redeemable preferred and common interests increased in value by $235.2 million, based upon valuations management performed with

TABLE OF CONTENTS

assistance from an independent valuation firm. The increase reflects a valuation that includes probability-weighted values implied by the Business Combination, see “— Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Estimates of Sunlight’s Equity Value.”

Other Factors Affecting Liquidity and Capital Resources

Unitholders’ Distribution

Pursuant to the Fourth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Sunlight, dated as of May 25, 2018, as amended or otherwise modified (the “Prior Sunlight LLC Agreement”), holders of Class A-1 Units, Class A-2 Units or Class A-3 Units (collectively, the “Class A Units”) were generally entitled to receive, with respect to each such Class A Unit, a preferred return on a quarterly basis. Sunlight’s board of directors could have elected to pay this return in cash or by issuing additional Class A Units to each such holder. If the board of directors elected to pay this return in cash, Sunlight would have paid such in an amount equal to $12.50, $15.22, and $24.06 per unit per annum to the Class A-1, Class A-2, and Class A-Units. If the board of directors elected to pay this return in additional units, the company would have issued a number of units equal to 14.5% of each such holders outstanding units, on an annualized basis. Sunlight’s board of directors elected to pay this return in the form of additional Class A Units for all periods through June 30, 2021 and such distributions in units continued through the date of the Business Combination. In addition, the Prior Sunlight LLC Agreement also provided that members of Sunlight were entitled to be paid certain tax distributions on a pro rata basis in accordance with their relative tax obligation from available cash and subject to certain customary limitations on distributions.

Sunlight replaced the Prior Sunlight LLC Agreement with the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement which was entered into concurrently with the Closing. Under the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement, Spartan Sub, as the sole managing member of Sunlight, has the right to determine when distributions will be made to the holders of Sunlight Units and the amount of any such distributions, except that Sunlight is required to make distributions to the extent and in an amount such that the Sunlight Unitholders, including Sunlight Financial Holdings, receive certain tax-related distributions and to make distributions in the event of dissolution. If a distribution is paid to the Sunlight Unitholders, such distribution will be made to the holders of Sunlight Units on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective percentage ownership of Sunlight Units. Funds used by Sunlight to satisfy its tax distribution obligations will not be available for reinvestment in its business, except to the extent Sunlight Financial Holdings uses any excess cash it receives to reinvest in Sunlight for additional Sunlight Units.

The holders of Sunlight Class X Units and Sunlight Class EX Units, including Spartan Sub, will generally incur U.S. federal, state and local income taxes on their share of any net taxable income of Sunlight. Net income and losses of Sunlight generally will be allocated to the holders of Sunlight Class X Units and Sunlight Class EX Units on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective percentage ownership of Sunlight Class X Units and Sunlight Class EX Units, subject to requirements under U.S. federal income tax law that certain items of income, gain, loss or deduction be allocated disproportionately in certain circumstances. To the extent that Sunlight has legally available cash (including borrowings available under the new credit facility or other debt arrangements) and subject to the terms of any current or future debt instruments, the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement requires Sunlight to make pro rata cash distributions to all holders of Sunlight Units, including Sunlight Financial Holdings, (1) first, in an amount sufficient to allow Sunlight Financial Holdings and its wholly owned subsidiaries to satisfy their actual tax liabilities and obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement except to the extent (i) based on the written advice of legal counsel, the distribution may reasonably constitute a fraudulent conveyance, or (ii) the terms of any financing necessary to make such tax distribution could reasonably, in the good faith judgment of Spartan Sub, cause Sunlight to become insolvent within the twelve (12) month period following the date of such distribution, and (2) thereafter to the extent necessary, in an amount generally intended to allow Sunlight Unitholders, including Sunlight Financial Holdings, to satisfy their respective income tax liabilities with respect to their allocable share of income of Sunlight, based on certain assumptions and conventions (including an assumed income tax rate) and after taking into account other distributions (including prior tax distributions) made by Sunlight.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Tax Receivable Agreement

On the Closing Date, Sunlight Financial Holdings entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement with the TRA Holders and the Agent (as defined therein). The Tax Receivable Agreement generally provides for the payment by Sunlight Financial Holdings to the Agent, for disbursement to the TRA Holders on a pro rata basis, of 85% of the net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax and franchise tax that Sunlight Financial Holdings actually realizes (or is deemed to realize in certain circumstances) in periods after the Closing as a result of (i) certain increases in tax basis that occur as a result of Sunlight Financial Holdings’ acquisition (or deemed acquisition for U.S. federal income tax purposes) of all or a portion of a TRA Holder’s Sunlight Class EX Units upon the exercise of the redemption or call rights set forth in the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement (as defined herein) and (ii) imputed interest deemed to be paid by Sunlight Financial Holdings as a result of, and additional tax basis arising from, any payments Sunlight Financial Holdings makes under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Sunlight Financial Holdings will retain the benefit of the remainder of the actual net cash savings, if any.

If Sunlight Financial Holdings elects to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement early or if it is terminated early due to Sunlight Financial Holdings’ failure to honor a material obligation thereunder or due to a Change of Control (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement), Sunlight Financial Holdings will be required to make a payment equal to the deemed present value of the anticipated future payments to be made by it under the Tax Receivable Agreement (based upon certain assumptions and deemed events set forth in the Tax Receivable Agreement), which amount may substantially exceed the actual cash tax savings realized by Sunlight Financial Holdings. In the case of an early termination upon a Change of Control, such early termination payment may, at Sunlight Financial Holdings’ election, be paid ratably over the two-year period following the Change of Control.

Operating Lease Obligations

Sunlight’s operating lease obligations consist of its lease of real property from third parties under noncancellable operating leases, including the lease of its current office spaces. Sunlight leases office space at two locations: (i) 101 N. Tryon Street, Suite 1000, Charlotte, North Carolina 28246 (the “North Carolina Office Space”) and (ii) 234 West 39th Street, 7th Floor, New York, New York 10018 (the “New York Office Space”). The operating lease rent expense for the North Carolina Office Space was $0.2 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively and $0.3 million and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The lease for the North Carolina Office Space will expire in February 2025. The operating lease rent expense for the New York Office Space was $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively and $0.2 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Available Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2021, Sunlight’s cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash was $66.4 million. The restricted cash held by Sunlight primarily relates to a cash reserve that Sunlight’s bank partner requires to secure Sunlight’s short-term guarantee obligations of certain loans temporarily held by Sunlight’s bank partner. The contractual cash reserve is the difference between (a) the average original issue discount percentage of loans originated and held by Sunlight’s bank partner and (b) a contractual minimum original issue discount percentage, multiplied by the balance of the loans on the bank partner’s balance sheet at a given time. Sunlight guarantees the loans between the time the bank partner originates such loans and the time Sunlight arranges the sale of such loans to a Sunlight indirect channel capital provider.

Sunlight’s liquidity and its ability to fund its capital requirements is dependent on its future financial performance, which is subject to general economic, financial and other factors that are beyond its control and many of which are described under “Risk Factors.” If those factors significantly change or other unexpected factors adversely affect Sunlight, Sunlight’s business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations or it may not be able to obtain future financings to meet its liquidity needs.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure used by Sunlight’s management to evaluate operating performance, generate future operating plans, and make strategic decisions, including those

TABLE OF CONTENTS

relating to operating expenses and the allocation of internal resources. Accordingly, Sunlight believes this measure provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating Sunlight’s operating results in the same manner as Sunlight’s management and board of directors. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA provides a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of Sunlight’s business, as it removes the effect of certain non-cash items, variable charges, non-recurring items, unrealized gains or losses or other similar non-cash items that are included in net income or expenses associated with the early stages of the business that are expected to ultimately terminate, pursuant to the terms of certain existing contractual arrangements or expected to continue at levels materially below the historical level, or that otherwise do not contribute directly to management’s evaluation of its operating results. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income excluding interest expense incurred in connection with Sunlight’s debt obligations, income taxes, amortization and depreciation expense, stock-based compensation expense, non-cash changes in certain financial instruments, fees paid to brokers related to the funding of loans by certain of Sunlight’s capital providers that will terminate pursuant to existing contractual arrangements, certain transaction bonuses and other expenses resulting from the Business Combination, and other items that management has determined are not reflective of Sunlight’s operating performance.

Free Cash Flow

Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP financial measure that Sunlight uses to indicate cash flow generated by Sunlight’s operations. Sunlight believes that Free Cash Flow is a supplemental financial measure useful as an indicator of Sunlight’s ability to generate cash. Sunlight’s calculation of Free Cash Flow, however, may not necessarily be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Specifically, Sunlight defines Free Cash Flow as cash from operating activities adjusted for changes in working capital (including changes in advances and funding commitments), capital expenditures, certain restricted cash items, business combination costs, and other items that management has determined are not reflective of cash generation in Sunlight’s business.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow as well as cash from operating activities to free cash flow for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2021			2020			2021			2020
Net Income (Loss)		$	5,243		$	(1,154)		$	7,903		$	(701)
Adjustments for adjusted EBITDA
Depreciation and amortization			801			815			1,610			1,618
Interest expense			317			169			572			328
Income taxes			—			—			—			—
Non-cash change in financial instruments			1,173			(57)			4,232			(94)
Equity-based compensation			7			20			18			97
Fees paid to brokers			1,059			429			2,169			1,258
Expenses from the Business Combination			2,895			—			6,482			—
Adjusted EBITDA			11,495			222			22,986			2,506
Adjustments for net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Interest expense			(317)			(169)			(572)			(328)
Income taxes			—			—			—			—
Fees paid to brokers			(1,059)			(429)			(2,169)			(1,258)
Expenses from the Business Combination			(2,895)			—			(6,482)			—
Provision for losses			436			354			1,172			478
Changes in operating capital and other			(1,054)			(8,410)			2,171			(11,615)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2021			2020			2021			2020
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities			6,606			(8,432)			17,106			(10,217)
Adjustments for free cash flow
Capital expenditures			(357)			(749)			(1,066)			(1,614)
Changes in advances, net of funding commitments			2,654			9,427			1,799			11,341
Changes in restricted cash			915			217			(125)			(682)
Payments of Business Combination costs			2,012			—			6,482			—
Other changes in working capital			(566)			386			(199)			537
Free Cash Flow		$	11,264		$	849		$	23,997		$	(635)

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of Sunlight’s financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Management makes subjective estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in Sunlight’s financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates significantly impact revenues, determinations of fair value and the recognition of interest income on financing receivables and loss allowances thereon.

In accordance with Sunlight’s policies, Sunlight regularly evaluates its estimates, assumptions and judgments, and bases its estimates, assumptions and judgments on its historical experience and on factors Sunlight believes reasonable under the circumstances. The results involve judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities not readily apparent from other sources. If Sunlight’s assumptions or conditions change, the actual results Sunlight reports may significantly differ from these estimates.

Sunlight believes the estimates and assumptions underlying its consolidated financial statements are reasonable and supportable based on the information available as of June 30, 2021; however, uncertainty over the ultimate impact COVID-19 will have on the global economy generally, and on Sunlight’s business, makes any estimates and assumptions as of June 30, 2021 inherently less certain than they would be absent the current and potential impacts of COVID-19.

See Note 2 — “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the notes accompanying Sunlight’s financial statements included elsewhere herein for a summary of Sunlight’s significant accounting policies, and discussion of recent accounting pronouncements. Sunlight believes that the following discussion addresses Sunlight’s most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of Sunlight’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments.

Platform Fees

Sunlight is a business-to-business-to-consumer, technology-enabled POS financing platform that provides residential solar and home improvement contractors the ability to offer seamless POS financing to their customers when purchasing residential solar systems or other home improvements. The resulting loans are funded by Sunlight’s network of capital providers who, by partnering with Sunlight, gain access to a difficult-to-reach loan market, best-in-class consumer credit underwriting and attractive risk adjusted returns. These loans are facilitated by Sunlight’s proprietary technology platform, Orange®, through which Sunlight offers instant credit decisions to homeowners nationwide at the POS on behalf of Sunlight’s various capital providers. Sunlight recognizes platform fees as revenues at the time that direct channel partners or indirect channel loan purchasers obtain control of the service provided to facilitate their origination or purchase of a loan, which is no earlier than when Sunlight delivers loan documentation to the customer. Sunlight wholly satisfies its performance obligation to direct channel partners, bank partner and indirect channel loan purchasers upon origination or purchase of a loan. Sunlight considers rebates offered by

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sunlight to certain contractors in exchange for volume commitments as variable components to transaction prices; such variability resolves upon the contractor’s satisfaction of their volume commitment. For outstanding volume commitments that require the contractor to deliver future loan volume, Sunlight reduces platform fee revenues it recognizes based on its estimates of the contractor’s delivery of future loan volume, which require significant judgment and are based, in part, upon the contractor’s historical volume delivery and Sunlight’s estimates of the contractor’s ability and likelihood to deliver future volume.

Sunlight’s contract pursuant to which its bank partner originates home improvement loans is considered a derivative under GAAP. As such, Sunlight’s revenues exclude the platform fees that Sunlight earns in connection with this contract. Instead, Sunlight estimates the fair value of the contract derivative based upon the present value of net cash flows Sunlight expects to collect under the contract, which predominately consist of the difference of the proceeds Sunlight expects to collect from an indirect channel capital provider at purchase of the loans by such capital provider (the principal balance of loans purchased less the relevant capital provider discount plus unpaid accrued interest on the loans to the date of purchase) and any amounts Sunlight owes to its bank partner in connection with such loans. Upon sale, Sunlight reverses the unrealized estimated fair value of the contract derivative for the loans sold and recognizes the net cash Sunlight receives from the sale within “Realized Gains on Contract Derivative, Net” in Sunlight’s consolidated statement of operations.

Sunlight is obligated to repurchase non-performing loans originated by its bank partner from the date of origination to the date the loans are purchased from Sunlight’s bank partner by a Sunlight indirect channel capital provider. Sunlight does not record loans originated by its bank partner on its consolidated balance sheets (as Sunlight is not the originator of the loans), but Sunlight does record a liability for the losses Sunlight reasonably expects to incur in connection with Sunlight’s guarantee of its bank partner. Sunlight’s measurement of this liability is subject to significant judgement using historical loss experiences to estimate the likelihood that the guaranteed loans will default prior to sale and the severity of the loss Sunlight expects to incur. At June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the unpaid principal balance of loans, net of applicable discounts, for guaranteed loans held by Sunlight’s bank partner and delinquent more than 90 days was $0.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

Financing Receivables

Sunlight records financing receivables for (a) advances that Sunlight remits to contractors on a short-term basis to facilitate the installation of residential solar systems and (b) loans purchased by Sunlight pursuant to the terms of its contracts with its various capital providers and certain five percent (5%) loan participations purchased by Sunlight. Sunlight uses significant judgement in its recognition of interest income and impairment of financing receivables.

Interest Income

Loans (including Sunlight’s participation interests in such loans) with respect to which Sunlight expects to collect the unpaid principal balance and interest payments as they become due are considered performing loans. Sunlight accrues interest income on performing loans based on the unpaid principal balance and contractual terms of the loan. Interest income also includes discounts associated with the loans purchased as a yield adjustment using the interest method, or on a straight-line basis when it approximates the interest method, over the loan term. Sunlight expenses loan origination costs for loans acquired by Sunlight (including its participation interests in loans) as incurred. Sunlight does not accrue interest on loans placed on non-accrual status or on loans where the collectability of the principal or interest of the loan are deemed uncertain.

Loans are considered past due or delinquent if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments are due. Generally, loans, including impaired loans, are placed on non-accrual status (i) when either principal or interest payments are 90 days or more past due based on contractual terms or (ii) when an individual analysis of a borrower’s creditworthiness indicates a loan should be placed on non-accrual status. When a loan owned by Sunlight is placed on non-accrual status, Sunlight ceases to recognize interest income on the loans and reverses previously accrued and unpaid interest, if any. Subsequent receipts on non-accrual loans are recorded as a reduction of principal, and interest income may only be recorded on a cash basis after recovery of principal is reasonably assured. Sunlight may return

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a loan to accrual status when repayment of principal and interest is reasonably assured under the terms of the loan or the restructured loan, as the case may be.

Advances made to contractors under Sunlight’s contractor advances program or prefunding program are created at par and do not bear, and therefore do not accrue, interest income.

Allowance for Losses

The allowance for financing receivable losses represents Sunlight’s best estimate of probable credit losses arising from financing receivables. Sunlight’s allowance for financing receivable losses is evaluated at least quarterly, and based upon management’s assessment of several factors including historical losses, changes in the nature and volume of financing receivables, overall portfolio quality, and existing economic conditions that may affect the customer’s ability to pay. Although management uses the best information available, the evaluation of these indicators of impairment requires significant judgment by Sunlight’s management to determine whether failure to collect contractual amounts is probable as well as in estimating the resulting loss allowance. Future adjustments to the allowance for financing receivable losses may be necessary due to economic, operating, regulatory and other conditions beyond Sunlight’s control. Sunlight believes that its allowance for financing receivable losses is adequate to cover probable loan losses. However, actual losses, if any, could materially differ from management’s estimates.

Estimates of Sunlight’s Equity Value

Sunlight’s equity has not historically traded on active market and the value of Sunlight’s equity relies upon significant judgement and estimates based on unobservable inputs. Sunlight’s management estimates the fair value of Sunlight’s equity, with assistance from an independent third-party valuation consultant, as determined in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The valuation of Sunlight’s equity involves estimates based on (a) the expectation of future cash flows that Sunlight will generate, discounted to the present using a rate based on rates of return available from alternative investments of similar type, quality, and risk and (b) application of a valuation multiple derived from a comparison of Sunlight to publicly traded comparable entities’ valuation (as adjusted for observable differences in growth, profitability, risk, and operations). Once Sunlight estimates the aggregate value of its equity, Sunlight allocates its equity value among the various equity interests using the preferred interests’ liquidation preferences, participation rights, distribution policy, and conversion rights to determine how proceeds from a liquidity event is distributed among the various equity interests at a future date.

As more fully described in Note 7 in the notes accompanying Sunlight’s financial statements included elsewhere herein, Sunlight applied a hybrid probability-weighted expected return valuation method at each of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, which incorporated two scenarios: (a) a scenario using a market valuation approach that assumed Sunlight completed the Business Combination and (b) a remain private scenario that used the aforementioned valuation approach.

Equity Interests Subject to Possible Redemption

Sunlight accounts for equity interests subject to possible redemption in accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” Conditionally redeemable equity interests (including equity interests that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within Sunlight’s control) is classified as temporary equity and measured at the higher of the equity interest’s redemption value or capital account carrying value. Sunlight classifies warrants exercisable in its equity interests classified as temporary equity as liabilities, which Sunlight carries at fair value.

Equity-Based Compensation

Sunlight has granted equity-based compensation awards that vest contingent upon one or more of the following conditions: (a) time-based service, (b) performance conditions based upon Sunlight’s equity value, as determined by Sunlight’s board of directors or a qualifying sale of Sunlight’s equity, achieving certain contractual thresholds, and (c) whether Sunlight issues Class A Units in-kind to satisfy the preferred return

TABLE OF CONTENTS

on Class A Units during the award’s vesting period until May 25, 2023 (provided that these awards are subject to the additional vesting requirements of (a) and (b) above). Sunlight generally expenses the grant- date fair value of these equity-based compensation awards over the required service period, but not before Sunlight deems applicable performance conditions probable.

Derivative Asset

Sunlight’s contract under which Sunlight arranges loans for the purchase and installation of home improvements other than residential solar energy systems contain features determined to be embedded derivatives from its host. Embedded derivatives are separated from the host contract and carried at fair value when the embedded derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract and a separate, standalone instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument. The derivative is measured both initially and in subsequent periods at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized on the statement of operations.

Sunlight uses a discounted cash flow model to value its derivative asset using various key assumptions, such as estimation of the timing and probability of expected future cash flows and selection of a discount rate applied to future cash flows using Sunlight’s implied credit risk.

Sunlight Rewards™ Program

The Sunlight Rewards™ Program is a proprietary loyalty program that Sunlight offers to salespeople selling residential solar systems for Sunlight’s network of contractors. Sunlight records a contingent liability under ASC 450-20 Loss Contingencies using the estimated incremental cost of each point based upon the points earned, the point redemption value, and an estimated probability of point redemption consistent with Sunlight’s historical redemption experience under the program. When a salesperson redeems points from Sunlight’s third-party loyalty program vendor, Sunlight pays the stated redemption value of the points redeemed to the vendor. If all points earned under the Sunlight Rewards™ Program were redeemed at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, Sunlight would pay $2.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of which Sunlight recorded liabilities of $1.3 million and $0.8 million.

Emerging Growth Company

As an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”), Sunlight is eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies.” Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. Unless otherwise stated, Sunlight elected to adopt recent accounting pronouncements using the extended transition period applicable to private companies. Accordingly, the information contained herein may be different than the information you receive from other public companies.

Sunlight also intends to take advantage of some of the reduced regulatory and reporting requirements of emerging growth companies pursuant to the JOBS Act so long as Sunlight qualifies as an emerging growth company, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation and exemptions from the requirements of holding non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation and golden parachute payments.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Issued, But Not Yet Adopted

See Note 2 — “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the notes accompanying Sunlight’s consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Related Party Transactions

Sunlight has entered into management agreements with certain affiliates. For the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, Sunlight paid an aggregate of $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and $0.2 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 in management fees under the agreements. The agreements were terminated in connection with the closing of the Business Combination. For additional information, see Note 9 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Sunlight.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Sunlight’s operations are limited to activity in the United States. These operations expose Sunlight to a variety of market risks, including the effects of changes in interest rates, changes in the credit markets, and general macroeconomic conditions. Sunlight monitors and manages these financial exposures as an integral part of its overall risk management program.

Market Risk

Sunlight’s business, the consumer financial services industry, its contractors’ and its capital providers’ businesses are all sensitive to macroeconomic conditions. Economic factors such as interest rates, changes in monetary fiscal and related policies, market volatility, consumer confidence, the cost of energy and unemployment rates are among the most significant factors that impact consumer spending behavior. Weak economic conditions or a significant deterioration in economic conditions reduce the amount of disposable income consumers have, which in turn reduces consumer spending and the willingness of qualified borrowers to take out loans. Such conditions are also likely to affect the ability and willingness of borrowers to pay amounts owed to Sunlight’s capital providers. Additionally, increases in the cost of solar related to increases in the cost of materials or applicable labor as compared to traditional or other alternative sources of power or material changes in the regulatory environment for instance impacting the continuing availability of the ITC could affect demand for residential solar systems. The occurrence of these factors could have a material adverse effect on Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

In the normal course of business, Sunlight is exposed to market risk and has established policies designed to protect against the adverse effects of this exposure. General economic conditions and the willingness of its capital providers to deploy capital in the consumer industries within which Sunlight operates impacts Sunlight’s performance. The facilitation of new loans through Sunlight’s proprietary technology-enabled POS financing platform, Orange®, and the platform fees that Sunlight earns from facilitating solar loans and the realized gains that Sunlight recognizes on home improvement loans, is dependent upon sales and installations of solar systems and other home improvements, respectively. Contractors’ sales may decrease or fail to increase due to factors outside of their control, such as the macroeconomic conditions referenced above, business conditions affecting the industry or the region or changing regulatory environments in which they operate. Weak economic conditions also could extend the length of contractors’ sales cycle and cause prospective borrowers to delay making (or not make) purchases of residential solar systems or home improvements. The decline of sales by contractors in Sunlight’s network, generally and for any reason, will result in reduced funded loan volume and associated fee income or gains, as the case may be, for Sunlight, which could materially adversely affect Sunlight’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Indirect Channel

Sunlight maintains certain risks as to loans that are originated by Sunlight’s bank partner and until such loans are purchased by a Sunlight indirect channel capital provider. During such time, Sunlight has risk related to the credit performance of such loans. To the extent any such loan defaults while owned by Sunlight’s bank partner, Sunlight is required to repurchase such loan. As well, the price at which an indirect channel capital provider is willing to purchase loans from Sunlight’s bank partner’s balance sheet may be impacted by movements in the interest rate or credit markets, which translates to higher capital provider discounts charged to Sunlight, which could materially decrease the platform fees or realized gains that Sunlight is able to earn associated with such loans and could materially and adversely impact Sunlight’s results of operations.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Direct Channel Capital Provider Discount

The price at which a direct channel capital provider is willing to fund a loan facilitated by Sunlight may be impacted by movements in the interest rate or credit markets, which could translate to higher capital provider discounts charged to Sunlight which, in turn, could materially decrease the platform fees or realized gains that Sunlight is able to earn associated with such loans and could materially and adversely impact Sunlight’s results of operations.

Contract Derivative

The arrangement with Sunlight’s bank partner to originate home improvement loans is considered a derivative under US GAAP. As such, Sunlight’s revenues exclude the platform fees that Sunlight earns from the sale of home improvement loans from the bank partner’s balance sheet. Instead, Sunlight records realized gains on the derivative upon such sale. The value of the derivative is dependent, in part, on LIBOR and if that index were to increase materially, it would have a material impact on the value of the derivative.

Concentration Risk

Sunlight’s business is currently concentrated on point of sale financing of U.S. residential solar systems and home improvements by connecting capital providers wishing to maintain a balance sheet of solar and/or home improvement loans and homeowners that wish to finance their related purchases. As a result, Sunlight is more susceptible to fluctuations and risks particular to U.S. consumer lending market than a more diversified company with businesses outside of the consumer lending market would be, and more specifically as to factors that may drive the demand for residential solar systems and other home improvements. Sunlight’s business concentration could have an adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Interest Rate Risk

Sunlight paid off its prior credit facility on April 26, 2021. On April 26, 2021, Sunlight entered into the Loan and Security Agreement. The Loan and Security Agreement, which replaces Sunlight’s prior $15.0 million credit facility, has a borrowing capacity of up to $30.0 million and matures on April 26, 2023. Borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement accrue interest at a rate equal to the greater of (i) 5.0% and (ii) the prime rate plus 1.75% per annum.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BUSINESS

Company Overview

Sunlight’s success is fueled by its strong and intentional culture based on core values such as honesty, fairness and scrappiness. Sunlight’s culture encourages Sunlight teammates to work collaboratively with Sunlight’s contractor and capital provider partners, and the consumers they serve, to find the right result to business challenges and to deliver white-glove service. Also core to Sunlight’s values is a passion for Sunlight’s business and the societal benefits that the business funds. To date, Sunlight has facilitated loans to more than 137,000 homeowners who, as a result, have had the opportunity to save money on their utility bills and choose renewable energy over carbon-producing traditional sources of power. As of the end of 2020, residential solar systems and energy efficient home improvement products, facilitated through Sunlight financings, have eliminated more than 12.6 million metric tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Sunlight has also executed the United Nations Climate Neutral Now Pledge, and its business was certified as carbon neutral for its fiscal year 2020. Sunlight will continue to pursue certification for carbon neutrality in the future.

Sunlight’s core business is facilitating loans made by Sunlight’s various capital providers to the consumer customers of residential solar contractors. Sales of Sunlight-facilitated loan products are made by contractors in the context of selling residential solar systems to consumers, allowing homeowners to go solar with no money down, and in most cases, immediately saving money on their utility bills and often saving a significant amount of money over the life of their solar system. While only approximately 20% of residential solar system sales were financed with solar loans in 2015, an estimated 63% of residential solar loan sales were financed with solar loans in 2020, according to Wood Mackenzie. Solar loans made to finance residential solar systems through the Sunlight Platform are made exclusively to homeowners. Sunlight believes that homeowners generally have better credit characteristics than other consumer groups. As of June 30, 2021, the average FICO score of all solar borrowers financed through the Sunlight Platform is 747. Both the generally strong credit profile of solar loan borrowers and attractive risk-adjusted returns on solar loans to capital providers have enabled Sunlight to build a diversified network of capital providers to fund the solar loans facilitated by the Sunlight Platform.

Sunlight’s revenue is primarily from platform fees earned on each solar and home improvement loan facilitated through Orange®. The platform fee is generally equal to the margin between the dealer fee charged to the contractor by Sunlight for each loan facilitated through Orange® and the discount at which Sunlight’s capital provider either funds or purchases such loan (as described in more detail below). The best-in-class credit quality of Sunlight-facilitated loans attracts diverse and attractively-priced capital (the “price” to Sunlight being the amount that a capital provider will pay to originate or purchase a Sunlight-facilitated loan), ensuring that Sunlight can offer competitive pricing to its network of contractors while still earning attractive margins. Sunlight’s business model is asset-light and therefore Sunlight has minimal consumer credit risk. Sunlight does not earn material revenue from loans maintained on its balance sheet.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sunlight’s Technology-Enabled POS Financing Platform and Loan Facilitation

The Sunlight Platform, Orange®, connects residential solar system contractors, homeowners desiring to finance the purchase of a residential solar system and capital providers interested in participating in the high quality but fragmented (and therefore difficult to access) consumer solar loan lending market. The figure below illustrates Sunlight’s role in facilitating loans, which is to connect key market participants to meet each party’s business needs through Orange®:

[MISSING IMAGE: TM2123257D1-ORG_SUNLIGH4CLR.JPG]

Orange® provides contractors and homeowners with access to a user-friendly, intuitive and efficient process to obtain residential solar system financing. Orange® walks the contractor through the sales process from the prequalification of the potential customer’s credit, through the initial credit application and decisioning and through loan funding. At the same time, Orange® provides contractors with an integrated back-end system to support individual transactions, contractor pipeline reviews and other innovations that Sunlight believes make providing financing through Orange® a significant value-add to the contractor’s business.

The process begins when a homeowner is considering the purchase of a solar system or other home improvement product from one of over 1,500 contractors with which Sunlight partners. Through the contractor’s access to Orange®, the contractor can offer the homeowner the opportunity to prequalify for credit or submit a credit application directly through the Sunlight Platform. Prior to submission of a credit application, the contractor can review with the homeowner multiple loan product offerings and use Sunlight’s multi-quote calculator in Orange® to compare estimated payment information for the loan products that interest the customer. Once the loan product is selected and the credit application is submitted, Sunlight’s instant credit-decisioning process produces a credit decision based on Sunlight’s tiered and proprietary credit strategy. If the homeowner is approved for credit, Sunlight’s loan allocation engine directs the credit application to a specific Sunlight capital provider based on product choice and other proprietary allocation criteria, and all relevant loan documentation is produced and delivered through Orange® to the homeowner electronically for execution and secure upload. The contractor experience through Orange® includes additional features, such as automated title check, income reasonableness determination and fraud validation, amongst others, facilitating the ease and efficiency of the Orange® loan facilitation experience and ensuring robust risk management on behalf of Sunlight’s capital providers.

Orange® also provides contractors with a robust pipeline management tool to ensure transparency to loan status. The contractors in Sunlight’s network can view their pipeline of transactions and open submission requirements to assure timely payment. Accessibility to the Sunlight Platform, beyond the Orange® web address, includes the ability to integrate Orange® into a contractor’s own website via a flexible application programming interface, or API, and mobile app capability. The salespeople selling residential solar systems or other home improvements for Sunlight’s network of contractors (whether internal to such contractor or employed by a third-party sales organization that is engaged by a contractor in Sunlight’s network) are eligible to participate in Sunlight’s proprietary loyalty program, Sunlight Rewards™, and earn valuable points for selling Sunlight-offered loans. Participating individuals selling residential solar

100

TABLE OF CONTENTS

systems earn points based on each sale following Sunlight’s initial approval to proceed with system construction. Participating individuals selling other home improvements earn points following the full disbursement of each home improvement loan. All participants can gain “status” for their overall loyalty by increasing the number of Sunlight-offered loans that they sell. This status can increase the number of points a participant can earn for any individual sale financed by a Sunlight-offered loan. Participants can track their points and status and choose to redeem points for an array of quality awards, all within Orange®. Sunlight partners with a third-party vendor to perform all of the reward fulfillment functions associated with Sunlight Rewards™. For all expected redemptions under Sunlight Rewards™, Sunlight maintains an expense on its balance sheet based on the cash value of the applicable points.

Relationships with Contractors

Sunlight’s expansive network of more than 1,500 residential solar system and other home improvement contractors, supported by a differentiated set of tools and services offered through Orange®, constitutes the distribution channel through which Sunlight builds funded loan volume and earns fee income. The ability to finance residential solar systems on terms that typically translate to immediate saving for homeowners on their utility bills and significant amounts in lifetime savings has materially contributed to the strong growth in the number of residential solar systems installed in the United States over the last five years. Sunlight attracts and builds strong relationships with residential solar system contractors of all sizes in key solar markets by prioritizing innovations in Orange® and providing services that assist the contractors in growing their own businesses. Sunlight’s team of business development and relationship management professionals provides hands-on support to these contractors. Sunlight believes that innovations such as prequalification capabilities, easy and secure document upload features, reliable next day funding and Sunlight’s short-term capital advance program (as described more fully below), amongst other innovations, both attract new contractors to Sunlight’s network and build loyalty and deepen Sunlight’s existing contractor relationships. In addition, Sunlight’s diverse set of capital providers enables Sunlight to offer its network of contractors a wide array of loan products that vary as to structure, interest rate and tenor, and thereby permits Sunlight’s network of contractors to offer the products that best serve their markets, and all at competitive pricing. These benefits to Sunlight’s existing network of contractors translate to deeper penetration of the contractors’ sales, which is an important contributor to the growth of Sunlight’s market share and revenue.

Relationships with Capital Providers

Sunlight’s business model is dependent on its ability to connect its capital providers, who wish to build a portfolio of residential solar system loans, to the homeowner customers of the contractors in Sunlight’s distribution network, who wish to finance the purchase of a residential solar system. Sunlight earns a platform fee on each solar and home improvement loan facilitated through Orange®. The platform fee is generally equal to the difference, or the margin, between (i) the dealer fee that Sunlight charges to contractors for access to Orange® and for making the various Sunlight-offered loan products available to such contractors and (ii) the capital provider discount charged by the relevant capital provider either funding or purchasing the loan in the direct and indirect channels, respectively (as described below). Sunlight’s business is therefore heavily dependent upon the availability of capital on attractive economic terms. Sunlight believes that it offers capital providers an attractive value proposition due to its industry-leading consumer credit underwriting, the attractive risk-adjusted returns that Sunlight’s capital providers earn relative to other asset classes, the access that the Sunlight Platform provides to a unique and growing asset class that may reduce volatility in the ability to deploy capital, and the ability to access new customers for very little cost.

101

TABLE OF CONTENTS

their business needs as related to the residential solar loan industry. Matters related to loan product, credit strategy, contractor commercial underwriting and consumer protection practices are considered and designed in tandem with the goal of creating a robust and growing channel for funded loan volume. Additionally, through Orange®, Sunlight’s capital providers can track and manage the pipeline of solar loan volume allocated to that capital provider. Sunlight’s relationships with its diverse and growing network of capital providers provides significant flexibility to source competitively priced capital. Since the acquisition of Sunlight’s initial flow capital funding source in 2016, the number of capital providers funding Sunlight-facilitated solar loans has increased materially and, more importantly, all of Sunlight’s direct channel capital providers have significantly increased their commitments to fund solar loan volume.

Sunlight’s Culture and Core Values

Sunlight’s management believes that delivering value to Sunlight’s investors requires good governance, transparency and a prioritization of Sunlight’s core values in making decisions and conducting its business. The Sunlight culture is intentional and is premised on a view that how Sunlight wins is equally important as winning itself. Sunlight recruits, develops and trains its team to embody this philosophy. Values such as fairness and honesty inform Sunlight’s relationships with its contractor network and capital providers, but also, for instance, how Sunlight’s call center interacts with homeowners in addressing their questions and beyond. Sunlight’s talent focus empowers Sunlight team members to act and is coupled with an expectation that their scrappiness and passion for Sunlight’s business creates a client focused intensity to drive for Sunlight’s success as well as the success of Sunlight’s partners. These values have been key to Sunlight’s strong operating results and Sunlight believes that preserving this culture is critical to its continued growth.

[MISSING IMAGE: TM2123257D1-ORG_CULTURE4CLR.JPG]

Sunlight’s Target Markets and Market Opportunities

Solar System Loan Market

Sunlight provides financing solutions for both the residential solar and home improvement industries. The market opportunity to finance residential solar systems is significant and growing. Homeowners’ increased opportunities to finance residential solar systems on terms that typically translate to immediate saving on their utility bills and significant amounts in life-time savings, the increased availability of residential

102

TABLE OF CONTENTS

solar system components at attractive prices, together with society’s gravitation to more environmentally sustainable power solutions, is driving the strong and ongoing development of the residential solar industry and, as a part of that industry, the solar loan market. According to Wood Mackenzie, the residential solar market has expanded from $8 billion in 2015 to almost $12 billion in 2020 and is projected to reach $13 billion in 2021. Approximately 63% of residential solar system sales are financed and Sunlight estimates that it is currently serving approximately 19% of that portion of the loan market, based on information obtained through Wood Mackenzie. Sunlight’s year-on-year growth in funded solar loan volume has outpaced the industry growth since inception, growing by 78% in 2019 over 2018 and another 36% in 2020 over 2019, implying that Sunlight’s business is growing with the market but also that Sunlight is increasing its market share.

Due to the highly localized nature of solar system installation and the many contractors selling solar, from local partnerships to larger public companies, this target consumer lending market is relatively fragmented across the country and difficult to reach in any appreciable volume by traditional third-party lenders. Sunlight reaches this market on behalf of its capital providers by partnering with contractors nationwide to offer its loan products through Orange®. The loan products offered through Orange® are primarily designed to target prime and near-prime borrowers who seek competitive financing opportunities. Orange® provides instant credit decisions at the POS, which provides a unique advantage to Sunlight and its capital providers of being the first financing option that consumers buying residential solar systems consider, and Sunlight’s intuitive and user-friendly process makes it easy for contractors to complete the financing transaction simultaneously with the sale of the solar system. This results in additional opportunities for contractors to quickly close sales using Orange® rather than experiencing the delay and uncertainty that would result from the introduction of third-party lenders. Sunlight believes that the residential solar market will continue to expand significantly each year and that Sunlight is well-positioned, through its relationships with contractors and its ability to create relationships with new contractors through its experienced sales team, to continue to grow.

Sunlight’s established ability to source additional contractor relationships presents a compelling value proposition to banks, credit unions and non-bank financing partners, which have traditionally been constrained in their ability to reach fragmented consumer lending markets. Sunlight believes its successful aggregation of lending opportunities with strong credit using Orange® provides loan volumes large enough to attract high-quality capital providers that provide competitively priced capital. Since inception, Sunlight has been successful in expanding its network of capital providers and increasing commitments from existing capital providers, ensuring that Sunlight can provide tailored, competitively priced lending options to contractors and consumers.

Home Improvement Loan Market

In 2019, Sunlight entered the home improvement market. Sunlight’s market opportunity for the financing of home improvement loans provides an additional growth and business diversification opportunity via a market that is similar to the residential solar industry in that it is relatively fragmented and hard to access for lenders because it is sold through a large market of primarily local and regional contractors. According to Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, the total home improvement market was estimated at approximately $400 billion in 2020. It was estimated by the United States Census Bureau that of the $400 billion annual U.S. home improvement loan market, approximately 29% of expenditures were related to energy efficient home improvements. Sunlight to date has elected to build its home improvement business organically and currently serves a small, but quickly growing, portion of that market. Although Sunlight believes that the market opportunity for Sunlight to finance home improvement loans is substantial, through the first quarter of 2021 the funded loan volume and revenue relating to home improvement loans have represented only an immaterial portion of Sunlight’s total funded loan volume and revenues during any period (a maximum of only approximately 5%, which occurred in the first quarter of 2021). Sunlight’s home improvement loan business model is nearly identical to Sunlight’s solar loan business model in that Sunlight’s business is conducted through Orange®, offering most of the same features to Sunlight’s network of home improvement contractors as Sunlight offers to its network of residential solar contactors. Further, Sunlight’s quickly growing network of home improvement contractors constitute the distribution channel for the loan products offered by Sunlight’s capital providers to the customers of these contractors. Sunlight has expanded its home improvement contractor network to approximately 440 as of

103

TABLE OF CONTENTS

December 31, 2020. Additionally, capital providers seeking to access the fragmented home improvement consumer lending market benefit from the same relationship factors and Sunlight credit underwriting and risk management as Sunlight’s residential solar loan capital providers. Sunlight’s expected source of revenue from the home improvement sector is also derived from the difference, or margin, between the dealer fee that Sunlight charges its network of home improvement contractors and the discount that Sunlight’s home improvement capital providers will charge to Sunlight to fund (for direct channel home improvement capital providers) or purchase (for indirect channel home improvement capital providers) the Sunlight-facilitated home improvement loans.

While the home improvement industry offers a significant opportunity for Sunlight to grow its business, the home improvement industry poses unique challenges. Home improvement projects tend to vary significantly in size, with minimum loan balances at $500 (far below minimum solar loan balances of $10,000) which can pose a unique credit profile for the consumer of such projects and related financing. In addition, the home improvement market requires far less specialization as compared to the specialization required for the installation of solar panels, which means that the home improvement market is even more fragmented, with home improvement projects of all sizes often being offered by smaller, local contractors across the country. Greater fragmentation will require Sunlight to develop a relatively larger network of home improvement contractors, and because of the lower loan balance to facilitate more transactions, to achieve the loan volume capital providers require to enter a specific consumer lending market. Notwithstanding these challenges, Sunlight is growing its home improvement contractor network rapidly, has engaged capital providers and has an experienced home improvement sales and management team. Sunlight believes that it is well positioned to capitalize on its experience in the residential solar industry and Orange® to build a successful home improvement loan business.

Sunlight’s Business Model and Operating Leverage

Homeowners wishing to finance their solar systems or other home improvement purchases work with their contractor to submit a loan application to Sunlight through Orange®. Sunlight charges the contractor a dealer fee for access to Orange® and the ability to offer customers attractive loan financing options at the POS. The dealer fee is an agreed-upon percentage of the loan balance which is the amount of the purchase price to the consumer for the solar system or other home improvement being purchased. Dealer fees are negotiated between Sunlight and the various contractors in Sunlight’s network based on the risk tier of the dealer, loan funding volume produced from the relationship, the specifics of the loan products that a contractor wishes to offer its customers and other factors.

Sunlight’s direct channel capital providers fund loans directly to Sunlight, generally at a discount to the loan balance, and Sunlight’s indirect channel capital providers purchase loans from Sunlight’s bank partner, also generally at a discount to the loan balance. The discount to the loan balance at which a capital provider funds or purchases a loan is referred to as the capital provider discount.

Sunlight earns a platform fee for each loan facilitated through Orange®. The platform fee is generally equal to the difference, or margin, between the dealer fee charged to the contractor by Sunlight for each loan facilitated through Orange® and the capital provider discount charged to Sunlight by the relevant capital provider funding or purchasing such loan. When a loan is funded by a Sunlight direct channel capital provider, Sunlight earns a platform fee when such loan is funded. When a loan is funded in the indirect channel by Sunlight’s bank partner, Sunlight earns a platform fee when such loan is sold by Sunlight’s bank partner to an indirect channel capital provider. The platform fee that Sunlight earns varies based on the loan product and the negotiated pricing terms with both Sunlight’s capital providers and the various contractors in Sunlight’s network.

Because Sunlight does not generally make loans or fund loans on its own balance sheet, but rather earns a fee to act as the facilitator of the loans made by Sunlight’s capital providers, Sunlight retains relatively limited consumer credit risk in the lending process. The limited consumer credit risk is primarily short-term in nature and is taken on in the context of Sunlight building portfolios of loans on the balance sheet of its bank partner for sale to its indirect channel capital providers. Sunlight also owns a small portfolio of loan participations (at 5% per loan) required by an early indirect channel capital provider. Loans on Sunlight’s balance sheet constitute an immaterial source of revenue. For addition information, please see the Risk Factor captioned “During the period from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021, Sunlight funded approximately

104

TABLE OF CONTENTS

11% of its total solar system loan volume and, during the period from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021, 100% of its home improvement loan volume through a bank partnership arrangement. Pursuant to the terms of that arrangement, Sunlight must arrange for the sale of the loans to a third party within 180 days from origination for solar system loans and, beginning on August 1, 2021, for certain home improvement loans that have been on its bank partner’s balance sheet for greater than 12 months, subject to certain exceptions. If Sunlight is not able to arrange these sales, Sunlight may be required to purchase all or a portion of these loans….” Total consumer credit losses on loans made through the Sunlight Platform and borne by Sunlight in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, were approximately $1.2 million, $0.8 million and $0.5 million. Total consumer credit losses on loans made through the Sunlight Platform and borne by Sunlight for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, were approximately $0.8 million and $0.3 million.

The chart below describes Sunlight’s primary economic model drivers.

[MISSING IMAGE: TM2123257D1-ORG_PRIMARY4CLR.JPG]

As Sunlight earns a platform fee on a per loan basis when a loan is funded or purchased, Sunlight’s top-line revenue is driven primarily by funded loan volume in the direct channel and, in the indirect channel, the loans sold to indirect capital providers. A strong and developing residential solar market, combined with the Sunlight Platform that is scalable within and across asset classes and other (and continuing) innovations around new loan products and proprietary sales tools, supports Sunlight’s expectation of continued material growth in funded loans. Additionally, Sunlight has significant operating leverage with expenses that are weighted to fixed costs as compared to the variable cost components. Sunlight’s operating leverage has been, and Sunlight believes will continue to be, a material driver of increases in Sunlight’s profitability. Sunlight’s operating expenses, as a percentage of revenue, have decreased from 126% in 2017 to 58% in the second half of 2020, and Sunlight believes that its operating leverage will continue to increase materially in the future as its funded loan volume grows.

Additional discussion of drivers of Sunlight’s business model and revenue streams, as well as other factors and business initiatives are discussed below. See — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Risk Management

Sunlight uses a multipronged risk management approach, leveraging the strengths of management’s experiences across a broad spectrum of consumer and commercial markets, which Sunlight believes is important to Sunlight’s ability to attract capital on economic terms beneficial to Sunlight and, thereby, to permit Sunlight to offer loan products consistent with consumer demands. First, Sunlight’s disciplined consumer credit underwriting produces funded loan volume with excellent credit quality relative to the credit quality of Sunlight’s closest competitors. Sunlight’s risk management begins with the requirement that its borrowers are the homeowners of the relevant properties, which drives positive borrower selection. Through Orange®, Sunlight deploys its proprietary credit strategy to leverage credit bureau data, such as FICO scores and tradeline data including depth of file, derogatories, bankruptcy history and certain other proprietary attributes and other non-credit bureau data, such as title and debt-to-income information. In

105

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2020, Sunlight’s funded solar loans carried an average FICO score of 747 and a debt-to-income ratio of approximately 30%. Through June 30, 2021, Sunlight’s funded solar loans carried an average FICO score of 747 and a debt-to-income ratio of approximately 31%. Additionally, Sunlight’s loan products are designed to include strong collateral and legal remedies. Sunlight’s solar loans are secured by purchase money security interests (“PMSIs”) on the purchaser’s panels and related equipment, as evidenced by UCC-1 financing statements and fixture filings on the purchased panels and related equipment. PMSIs are senior in priority on such panels and equipment to the mortgage held by a borrower’s mortgage lenders. The PMSI provides notice of bankruptcy or foreclosure, providing an opportunity to recover on the solar loan without the expense and distraction of physically recovering the actual solar panels. Loan terms also include the ability to terminate solar loan power generation, which does not cut off a borrower’s access to power, but does, in many cases, increase a homeowners’ cost of power and therefore helps deter delinquencies and defaults. Sunlight home improvement loans are unsecured, and in 2020 carried an average FICO score of 754 and a debt-to-income ratio of approximately 28%.

Second, Sunlight has established a robust commercial underwriting and ongoing monitoring process to assure that the quality of the work product, solar system construction, financial condition (to support construction processes and provide post construction warranty support) and legal compliance practices of the contractors in Sunlight’s network. Residential solar system sales, financing and installation generally occurs in four steps: (1) the sale of the system; (2) system planning and processing; (3) system installation; and (4) interconnection to the local power grid. The sale of a solar system, while previously most commonly occurring at the home of the potential customer, is now being conducted primarily online and via telephone. Contractor sales teams make cold-calls or follow up on previously obtained leads to review with homeowners the value of purchasing a residential solar system: to realize substantial savings on the homeowner’s utility bills over the life of the system and to contribute to the world-wide effort to reduce carbon in the atmosphere. If the homeowner is interested in financing the purchase of a solar system, the homeowner’s contractor together with the homeowner may access Orange® to submit a loan application, obtain an instant credit decision and review the Sunlight loan products available to such homeowner — all at the initial POS. The second phase of the project, system planning and processing, involves finalizing the design, clearing any remaining loan stipulations that may have been identified during the POS credit approval process, executing loan documentation and receiving Sunlight’s initial approval to proceed with system construction. In the third phase, the contractor will order the required equipment, obtain required permits and complete the installation of the solar system. Once installation is completed, pictures of the completed project are submitted to Sunlight via Orange® and the contractor will request funding. Generally, within 24 hours of such request, Sunlight will fund the contractor the appropriate dollar amount — the loan balance less the applicable dealer fee (with a holdback in some circumstances to support project interconnection). Promptly thereafter, Sunlight is paid by the relevant Sunlight capital provider the loan balance less the previously agreed capital provider discount, thereby reimbursing Sunlight for its prefunding advance to the contractor and, in the case of a direct channel capital provider, enabling Sunlight to retain the related platform fee. If the loan is to be funded by an indirect channel capital provider, Sunlight’s bank partner reimburses Sunlight for the prefunding advance but the related platform fee is not earned by Sunlight until the loan is purchased from Sunlight’s bank partner by an indirect channel capital provider. Funding of the loan at installation initiates booking of the homeowner’s loan and interest accrual, with the initial payment due on the loan by the homeowner 60 days after the loan has been funded. In the fourth and final phase, the solar system is connected to the local utility grid; evidence of this interconnection is provided to Sunlight via Orange® and, if any amounts have been held back, final payment of the withheld amount is made to the contractor.

Because of the broader span of home improvement projects that may be financed through Orange®, the process for sale, design and approval, permitting, construction and other required steps varies from the solar loan process described above. Sunlight generally funds home improvement loans upon project completion. Based on the risk tier of the home improvement contractor as described below, the nature of the project being funded and other proprietary risk criteria, certain of the home improvement contractors in Sunlight’s network may also submit requests through Orange® for and, subject to meeting the applicable requirements, be paid a maximum of two progress payments. Progress payments are funded by Sunlight’s capital provider to the relevant home improvement contractor, less a pro rata portion of the applicable dealer fee. Interest, as applicable, begins to accrue to the homeowner when the progress payment is funded by the capital provider, to the extent funded. The loan balance and related interest, as applicable based on the specifics

106

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of the loan product selected by the homeowner/borrower, increases when additional funding for the home improvement project is made to the relevant contractor at project completion.

Most frequently, installation of a residential solar system will take between 120 to 180 days from the time of initial credit approval at the POS. The process can be subject to delays due to manufacturers failing to deliver equipment on time, contractors getting behind schedule, weather, construction issues related to the home on which the panels are to be installed, the ability to obtain required permits or get interconnected in a timely manner and many other circumstances. Home improvement projects can also be subject to delays based on similar concerns. The length of time associated with the process and the complexity of the steps in the sale, design and construction performed by the contractors for both residential solar systems and home improvement projects all create potential risk for Sunlight and its capital providers in the form of commercial credit risk related to the financial condition and liquidity of such contractors and their ability to complete the projects and to pay back any advances that may have been made by Sunlight. Additionally, there are business and legal risks associated with the potential for faulty construction and legal risks associated with the contractor’s sales practices, amongst other potential risks. For this reason, Sunlight has adopted vigorous contractor diligence and monitoring procedures.

Upon the engagement of a contractor into Sunlight’s network, Sunlight diligences credit bureau data and the contractor’s financial and liquidity position, and performs a review of the contractor’s reputation, workmanship warranty offered to its customers and other legal documentation and sales tools used by the contractor. Once onboarded, Sunlight continues to monitor the contractors in its network against these same standards at least annually and, if advisable, more frequently. Also, at onboarding, Sunlight provides training to contractor sales personnel to make certain they are familiar with Orange® and to introduce them to the important consumer protection requirements relevant to the loan sales process. Based on Sunlight’s diligence findings, Sunlight either accepts or declines to include a contractor in its network. Contractors that are accepted are categorized into risk tiers that can drive the periodicity of monitoring, the amount of the original issue discounts, or fees, charged to such contractors by Sunlight and, for solar system contractors, the availability of advances and the amount of any advances, if eligible, as well as other key business terms applicable to the contractor’s relationship with Sunlight.

Additional commercial risk management tools include a Sunlight call center staffed with experienced relationship managers who address customer complaints and facilitate resolution of differences between the contractor and the contractor’s customer as they move through the residential solar system installation and loan funding process. Sunlight’s network of contractors executes program agreements which include covenants and indemnities to address risks to Sunlight and its capital providers that may result from the actions of the contractor in the sales and installation processes of residential solar systems or home improvements financed with Sunlight-offered loan products.

Third, Sunlight maintains an approved vendor list (“AVL”) of residential solar system equipment manufacturers to be used in the construction of residential solar systems. Equipment made by manufacturers on the Bloomberg New Energy Finance quarterly bankability report are eligible for inclusion on Sunlight’s AVL. Sunlight independently diligences any equipment made by a manufacturer not on the AVL or that has been removed from the AVL. In this process, Sunlight uses third party resources to obtain and evaluate the potential credit, operational, reputational and financial risk of the equipment providers. In approving equipment, Sunlight looks for any performance issues known in the market or identified in any industry performance analyses available. Sunlight also requires that the equipment have market standard manufacturers’ warranties. The contractors’ program agreements contain commitments to use the approved equipment in their residential solar installation projects. Sunlight is a member of, and is on the board of, the Solar Energy Industries Association (“SEIA”) and has executed SEIA’s Forced Labor Prevention Pledge, indicating Sunlight’s opposition to the use of forced labor practices in the solar supply chain and supports SEIA’s effort to develop a solar supply chain tracking protocol to track any equipment that may be sourced from companies using forced labor in the solar industries.

Sunlight’s History

Foundations and Proof of Concept

Sunlight was founded in 2014 by principals of Hudson Sustainable Group, LLC (“Hudson Sustainable Group”), including former Sunlight board members Neil Auerbach, the former chairman,

107

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and Wilson Chang. Sunlight formed an early relationship with its current bank partner to begin offering solar loans to the customers of residential solar installers looking to offer financing options to their customers. Sunlight’s loan offering capitalized on consumers looking to access residential solar power increasingly interested in owning their own residential solar systems and financing the purchase through a solar loan, as opposed to leasing such systems from third parties or entering into power purchase agreements. Sunlight raised its first institutional equity capital from Tiger Infrastructure Partners LP (together with its affiliates, “Tiger”) in 2015 to support Sunlight’s further development, including hiring the current management team and accelerating Sunlight’s growth.

Early Growth and Establishment of Key Partnerships

In June of 2016, Sunlight was able to upsize the loan funding commitment from its direct channel capital provider to $100 million and a month later established an anchor partnership with a large residential solar system contractor (constituting approximately 32.6% of the residential solar installation market as of December 31, 2015). By the end of fiscal year 2016, funded loan volume facilitated by Sunlight since inception exceeded $90.9 million and Sunlight began to diversify its capital sources and build its contractor network.

Diversification of Contractors and Development of Sunlight’s Proprietary Technology-Enabled POS Financing Platform

During 2017, Sunlight hired a staff of experienced business development and sales members and began focusing on building a national network of contractors to grow and diversify Sunlight’s funded solar loan volume. At the same time, Sunlight increased the funding commitments of its existing capital providers and added new capital providers to support its growing business. In the first half of 2017, Sunlight raised additional capital from Tiger and invested a portion of the proceeds in building Orange®. Proceeds from the 2017 capital raise were also used to expand Sunlight’s existing capital provider relationships and facilitate additional flow loan program relationships with new credit unions and banks as well as to continue growing Sunlight’s sales team and network of contractor relationships. By the summer of 2017, Sunlight had put into place a complete management team with deep experience in credit, finance and solar. By the end of calendar year 2017, Sunlight’s cumulative funded volume of loans since inception exceeded $475 million.

Sunlight’s Continued Growth and Profitability

During the first half of 2018, Sunlight raised additional equity capital from FTV Capital (together with its affiliates, “FTV”) and invested the proceeds in continuing to develop and refine Orange®, which had been launched in the first quarter of that year, as well as to automate Sunlight’s internal operations to accelerate certain processes and offer improved service to its network of contractors and capital providers. These improvements spawned significant growth in Sunlight’s relationships and funded loan volumes. Additionally, Sunlight continued to develop its sales team with the addition of regional sales capability and continued to add funding sources, both direct and indirect. Sunlight was also able to materially upsize the funding commitments of its existing capital providers. Sunlight also established additional contractual relationships with institutional capital providers to provide additional funding for loans and diversify potential funding sources for the Sunlight Platform. By the end of the second quarter of 2018, Sunlight launched Orange®, which allowed Sunlight to integrate information from loan applicants, contractors and capital providers to provide nearly instant credit decisions and a seamless loan facilitation process. By the end of calendar year 2018, Sunlight’s cumulative funded loan volume since inception exceeded $1 billion. By the end of 2019, Sunlight’s funded loan volume exceeded $2.1 billion since inception and Sunlight became profitable as calculated based on GAAP. By the end of 2020, Sunlight’s funded loan volume since inception exceeded $3.5 billion offered through more than 1,200 contractors.

Entry into Home Improvement Loan Market

In the first quarter of 2019, Sunlight launched its home improvement loan business, which is also conducted through Orange®. The characteristics of the approximately $400 billion per year industry, based on the Improving America 2019 Report of the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, are sufficiently consistent with the characteristics of Sunlight’s solar business that Sunlight was able to adapt Orange® with minimal new investment. In addition, in 2020, based on a report by the United States

108

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Census Bureau, approximately 29% of all home improvement construction projects were related to energy efficiency upgrades or modifications, which is consistent with Sunlight’s values related to sustainability. Sunlight’s expansion into the home improvement loan market was coupled with the expansion of strategic partnerships with distributors and other industry stakeholders to rapidly expand the number of contractor relationships, and that effort is still ongoing. Although Sunlight believes that the market opportunity for Sunlight to finance home improvement loans is substantial, through the first quarter of 2021 the funded loan volume and revenue relating to home improvement loans have represented only an immaterial portion of Sunlight’s total funded loan volume and revenues during any period (a maximum of only approximately 5%, which occurred in the first quarter of 2021). Sunlight’s home improvement loan business is nascent and does not constitute a material portion of Sunlight’s revenue.

Rapid Growth and the Impact of COVID-19

During the first quarter of 2020, Sunlight experienced continued growth in funded loan volumes, which was a continuation of the rapid growth experienced by Sunlight in 2019. The onset of COVID-19 in the U.S. beginning in March 2020 led to a decline in residential solar system sales and a small decline in the funded loan volume in the second quarter of 2020, resulting in a 3% decline in the number of credit approvals and a 15% decline in the volume of loans facilitated by Sunlight and funded during the second quarter of 2020, in each case, as compared to the second quarter of 2019. Sunlight believes that the decline in solar sales after the onset of COVID-19 related to the inability of certain contractors in Sunlight’s network to execute on their traditional sales model, which was door-to-door. However, residential solar sales subsequently rebounded and Sunlight’s funded volumes quickly followed as those systems were installed beginning late in the second quarter and in the third quarter of 2020. Sunlight believes that this recovery was significantly related to a change in sales model by solar contractors to an online process that is more efficient and which is expected to continue. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, Sunlight funded approximately $1.5 billion and $1 billion, respectively, of new loans. During the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, Sunlight funded approximately $1.2 billion and $0.5 billion, respectively, of new loans, which resulted in cumulative funded loan volume since inception of approximately $4.8 billion and $2.6 billion as of June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Subject to the fluctuations naturally occurring in Sunlight’s business from seasonality as discussed below, Sunlight believes that it will continue to experience funded loan volume consistent with what Sunlight experienced in the first quarter of 2021 and beyond as the residential solar market continues to expand and Sunlight’s penetration in that market also continues to expand.

Sunlight’s Products

Sunlight-offered Solar Loans

Sunlight offers a broad range of solar loan products, varying as to structure, tenor and interest rate, which are focused on differing contractor and consumer objectives and market dictates. Sunlight offers solar loan products structured to support the financing of residential solar systems as well as to meet other homeowner demands such as loans to:

•

finance the acquisition of a solar battery to be retrofit to an existing homeowner solar system;

•

provide financing for a residential solar system plus a new roof in the same loan as is often required to support the addition of the solar panels;

•

finance solar in addition to other forms of home improvement projects; and

•

support recently launched solar roof products (solar roof tiles).

Sunlight’s solar loan products are secured and fixed rate, closed-end term loans. Specific terms are developed to address homeowner financing needs, amongst other factors as discussed below, and include tenors between five and 25 years with interest rates per annum ranging from 0.99% to 7.49%. Not all tenors are offered at each available interest rate and not all solar loan structures are offered at all tenors. For a solar loan, minimum principal amounts are generally $10,000 and maximum principal amounts are $100,000, all subject to qualification requirements.

109

TABLE OF CONTENTS

All of Sunlight-offered solar loans cover the full cost of the relevant solar project. No down payment by the homeowner is necessary. Sunlight solar loan products are secured (by the system panels and related equipment), fixed-rate loans with mortgage style amortization; the loans are funded and interest begins to accrue upon installation. The borrower’s first payment is due 60 days after funding. None of the Sunlight-offered solar loan products have prepayment penalties. Sunlight-offered solar loans are generally structured with a re-amortization mechanism that occurs 18 months after the loan was funded and that is intended to provide homeowners with an attractive monthly payment. The re-amortization mechanism assumes availability of the solar federal income tax credit to the borrower and, to the extent the homeowner uses those funds when received or otherwise prepays the loan in the amount of the solar federal tax credit (currently 26%), the homeowner’s monthly payment will stay the same as it was during the first 18 months. If the borrower does not make the prepayment or prepays the loan in a lesser amount, the borrower’s payment will increase beginning in month 19 of the loan.

The particulars of the solar loan products offered through Orange® are determined by consumer demand, terms requested by Sunlight’s contractors (which may also be driven by dealer fees charged to contractors for a given loan product), availability of attractively-priced funding from Sunlight’s capital providers, the attractiveness of a given loan product measured by the production of related loan volume, the interest rate environment and other market factors and the regulatory and risk management concerns of Sunlight and its capital providers, in addition to other considerations. One of the strengths of Sunlight’s diverse and growing network of capital providers is Sunlight’s ability to be flexible in the face of changing demands and market parameters. Sunlight has also recently begun offering its loan products through Orange® in Spanish.

The following table sets forth weighted average characteristics of Sunlight’s solar loan products for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020:

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2021			2020
Term (in months)			236			222
Interest Rate			2.4%			4.0%
FICO Score			750			742
Loan Balance		$	39,556		$	34,335

The following table sets forth weighted average characteristics of Sunlight’s solar loan products for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:

	For the Year Ended December 30,
	2020			2019
Term (in months)			229			212
Interest Rate			3.32%			4.12%
FICO Score			747			741
Loan Balance		$	36,015		$	32,604

Sunlight-Facilitated Home Improvement Loans

Home improvement loans offered by Sunlight through Orange® are unsecured, closed-end term loans. The structures applicable to loan products in the home improvement space tend to be more varied. Consumer demand includes payment structures that include delays in the start of payment obligations, periods of interest only payments, periods of principal only payments as well as straight-line amortizing fixed rate loans. Sunlight has developed a full range of loan products including different tenors that range from three to 12 years. Home improvement loans are often significantly smaller than solar loans with a minimum loan balance of $500 but can also be as large as $100,000. During 2020, interest rates on Sunlight-offered home improvement loan products ranged up to 21.99%. Similar to Sunlight-offered solar loans, Sunlight-facilitated home improvement loans offered through Orange® are determined by consumer demand, terms requested

110

TABLE OF CONTENTS

by Sunlight’s contractors (which may also be driven by the dealer fee charged to a contractor for a given loan product), availability of attractively-priced funding from Sunlight’s capital providers, the attractiveness of a given loan product measured by the production of related loan volume, the interest rate environment and other market factors and the regulatory and risk management concerns of Sunlight and its capital providers amongst other considerations. Sunlight home improvement loan products do not currently make up a material portion of Sunlight funded loan volume and are currently funded exclusively through indirect channel capital providers.

The following table sets forth weighted average characteristics of Sunlight’s home improvement loan products for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020:

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2021			2020
Term (in months)			116			109
Interest Rate			9.7%			9.8%
FICO Score			756			751
Loan Balance		$	16,105		$	13,864

The following table sets forth weighted average characteristics of Sunlight’s home improvement loan products for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:

	For the Year Ended December 30,
	2020			2019
Term (in months)			119			115
Interest Rate			9.45%			9.78%
FICO Score			755			754
Loan Balance		$	15,711		$	16,103

Contractor Advance Funding Program and Prefunding Program

An important part of Sunlight’s value proposition to residential solar contractors is the opportunity to participate in Sunlight’s advance program, which, Sunlight believes, is offered on more flexible terms (subject to commercial underwriting qualification) than those offered by Sunlight’s competitors, if offered at all. Residential solar system contractors face significant upfront costs prior to installation and receipt of payment for the installation by their customers. The Sunlight advance program is designed to support the related liquidity and cash flow management needs of its qualifying contractors. Sunlight’s advance program has two components: (1) milestone advances and (2) contractor prefunding advances.

Sunlight’s milestone advance program provides qualifying solar contractors with short-term capital advances to support upfront costs and liquidity needed to purchase equipment and pay third party contractors in the due course of its installation business. Milestone advances are generally required to be repaid in 90 days or less from the advance date and are typically repaid by Sunlight deducting the related amounts from the loan funding to the contractor upon completion of a given project. Sunlight’s milestone advance program is generally offered to contractors in Sunlight’s top risk tiers which have the strongest commercial risk assessment results. While Sunlight has advanced approximately $544 million to contractors in its network since inception, Sunlight has only experienced approximately $0.4 million in losses on those advances.

Sunlight also offers the contractors in its network prefunding advances. Prefunding advances are advances made by Sunlight to a contractor within 24 hours of a request for funding on a specific Sunlight-offered loan at installation of a given project. Sunlight offers its contractors prefunding advances to bridge the time that it takes for the relevant capital provider to review relevant documents and execute on its funding commitment. Sunlight is reimbursed for prefunding advances when Sunlight receives the funds from the relevant capital provider for the related loans. Typically, Sunlight is reimbursed for prefunding advances

111

TABLE OF CONTENTS

within 24 to 72 hours. Because the risk in prefunding advances tends to be short-term and the contractors are not specifically responsible for the repayment obligation, Sunlight’s prefunding advance program is offered to contractors in Sunlight’s network across the spectrum of Sunlight’s assigned contractor risk tiers.

Seasonality

The residential solar and home improvement markets are subject to seasonality primarily related to weather and other industry factors, which typically causes fluctuations in Sunlight’s operating results and can cause Sunlight’s future performance to be difficult to predict. Sunlight has experienced seasonal and quarterly fluctuations in the past and expects to experience such fluctuations in the future. Generally, Sunlight’s contractors experience higher sales in the second and third quarters of each year. Given the timeline between a solar system or home improvement sale and when a loan to finance such project is funded, this generally results in higher funded volumes for Sunlight, on a relative basis, in the third and fourth quarters of each year. Sunlight believes that the seasonality in credit applications and funded volume that it experiences in its business is consistent with others that compete in the same markets.

Agreements with Our Capital Providers

Sunlight’s ability to facilitate loans and earn platform fees sufficient to grow Sunlight’s business depends on Sunlight’s capacity to source attractive capital from capital providers willing to fund loan products that work for consumers in the residential solar and home improvement markets, and that permit Sunlight to charge competitive dealer fees to the contractors in Sunlight’s network. Sunlight’s capital providers include banks, credit unions, and non-depository institutions. Sunlight has expanded its relationship with each of its direct channel capital providers year over year and we are in negotiations with additional banks, credit unions and non-depository institutions regarding new potential partnerships. Sunlight enters into loan program and loan sale agreements with capital providers, as well as ancillary agreements for loan administration and related matters, depending on whether Sunlight’s relationship is with a direct channel or indirect channel capital provider, and other business requirements of the capital provider.

Direct Channel Capital Provider Program Agreements

Sunlight’s relationships with its direct channel capital providers are primarily governed by loan program agreements, as well as ancillary special servicing and related agreements depending on the full scope of the capital provider relationship. The loan program agreement establishes the obligations of Sunlight in facilitating the origination of loans as well as of the capital provider to fund loans, including establishing the amount and tenor of the capital provider’s commitment to funding loan volume. Sunlight’s direct channel capital provider loan program agreements generally automatically renew on an annual basis, unless previously terminated subject to a notice period of at least several months or unless the agreement is terminated by either party for cause generally defined as for material breach, fraud, willful misconduct, gross negligence or insolvency of the other party. The loan program agreements set forth the range of loan products to be offered by the capital provider, any jurisdictional limits and the relevant dollar price to be paid by the capital provider to Sunlight in the context of funding each such product. The range of products provided by a capital provider and the dollar prices to be paid by the capital provider with regard thereto are generally subject to change with notice from the capital provider (with respect to borrowers not yet credit approved on the date of such notice).

Certain of Sunlight’s direct channel capital providers have approval rights over whether the capital provider is willing to fund the loans facilitated by a given contractor based on their risk assessment of such contractor. Other capital providers rely on Sunlight’s risk assessment to approve contractors. Sunlight’s capital providers are committed to fund any loan submitted by an approved contractor through Orange® that otherwise meets the capital provider loan product requirements as set forth in the loan program agreement with the applicable capital provider at the time the borrower is credit approved and directed to the capital provider by Sunlight’s loan allocation engine, even though loan funding will typically not occur until sometime later.

Sunlight does not currently service loans for its direct channel capital providers but, in some circumstances, for a fee, Sunlight has agreed to administer servicing and provide some special servicing

112

TABLE OF CONTENTS

services on behalf of its direct channel capital providers. Sunlight does not perform debt collection services. All of Sunlight’s direct channel capital providers engage third party debt collectors as may be required.

None of Sunlight’s direct channel capital provider program agreements have change of control provisions triggered by the Business Combination described herein. However, certain of the loan program agreements do have notice requirements. Sunlight complied with all such requirements prior to the Closing.

Sunlight’s Bank Partner and Indirect Channel Capital Providers

Approximately 22% of Sunlight’s funded solar loan volume during 2020, and all of Sunlight’s funded home improvement loan volume, was initially funded by Cross River Bank, Sunlight’s bank partner, for purchase by an indirect channel capital provider. Sunlight’s indirect channel capital providers either enter into flow program agreements whereby they make a commitment to buy a maximum dollar amount of funded loans over a designated period of time or they enter into discrete loan sale agreements whereby they buy funded pools of loans from time to time on a one-off basis, in each case from the balance sheet of Sunlight’s bank partner.

Sunlight’s solar loan bank partnership arrangement has a four-year term, expiring in 2022, and automatically renews thereafter every two years unless terminated by either Sunlight or its bank partner with several months’ advance notice or for “cause.” Sunlight’s bank partnership arrangement generally describes services that Sunlight provides to the bank partner in the process of the bank partner’s origination of loans, the fees charged by the bank partner to originate loans, the amount of loans that the bank partner will retain on its balance sheet and for how long and under what circumstances. Sunlight’s arrangements with its bank partner also require that Sunlight guarantee and purchase solar loans when subject to charge-off by Sunlight’s bank partner, and with respect to home improvement, any loan that becomes 60 days delinquent. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Sunlight repurchased and wrote off 49 loans from its bank partner, totaling $1.1 million, associated with the repurchase obligation concerning charge-offs and delinquencies. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, Sunlight repurchased and wrote off 17 and 51 loans from its bank partner, totaling $0.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, associated with the repurchase obligation concerning charge-offs and delinquencies. Sunlight acts as the administrator for its bank partner’s portfolio of Sunlight-facilitated loans, and Sunlight has access to comprehensive daily reporting regarding those loans, which allows it to track the status of loans, including days from origination, and monitors the performance of those loans on a loan-level basis. The above description of the bank partnership agreement describes the material terms of the arrangement, and a copy of the solar loan bank partnership agreement with Cross River Bank is included as an exhibit to the Registration Statement of which this prospectus is a part.

Sunlight may also be required to purchase loans from its bank partner after an agreed period of time if Sunlight has not arranged the sale of such loans. To date, Sunlight has not been required to purchase loans from its bank partner due to an inability to sell such loans to an indirect channel capital provider. Additionally, Sunlight takes the risk of compliance errors and the risk of borrower or contractor fraud in the origination of the loans. Sunlight has also entered into a program agreement with its bank partner to fund its home improvement loans that contains similar provisions related to risks accepted by Sunlight.

Sunlight does not currently service loans for its bank partner but does provide servicing administration and some special servicing services on behalf of its bank partner. Sunlight does not perform debt collection services for its bank partner.

Sunlight’s bank partnership arrangement does not have a change of control consent right triggered by the Business Combination but does have a notice requirement. Sunlight complied with this requirement prior to Closing of the Business Combination.

Sunlight’s indirect channel capital provider agreements that govern committed multi-loan pool purchases establish the amount of the capital provider commitment or loan pool, as the case may be, loan pool parameters including, for instance, loan product type, seasoning, any relevant asset concentration limits and pricing. The indirect channel capital provider agreements further describe any ongoing obligations of Sunlight with respect to the assets which include asset level representations as to the pool requirements, legality and other non-credit origination criteria. Sunlight’s indirect channel capital provider program

113

TABLE OF CONTENTS

agreements generally have a term of one year or more with potential extensions built into the terms. Sunlight has successfully negotiated with its indirect channel capital providers for new commitments since inception of its relationships with these capital providers.

Sunlight does not currently service loans for any indirect channel capital provider but does provide servicing administration and some special servicing services on behalf of certain of its capital providers. Sunlight does not perform debt collection services for its indirect capital providers.

One indirect channel capital provider agreement contains a provision allowing the capital provider to stop funding loans in connection with the Business Combination. Sunlight obtained a written waiver of this provision from the capital provider.

Sunlight has recently executed an indirect channel capital provider program agreement for the purchase of home improvement loans from the balance sheet of Sunlight’s bank partner. Such agreement is with an indirect channel capital provider with which Sunlight also maintains an indirect channel program agreement for the purchase of solar loans.

Agreements with Contractors, Distributors and Referral Arrangements

Sunlight’s relationships with contractors in its network are established by entry into contractor financing program agreements. Sunlight’s program agreements are generally standardized, with a few exceptions related to large, enterprise partnerships and then only with respect to a few key terms for such partners. Sunlight’s contractor program agreements establish the obligations of the contractor in offering Sunlight’s loan products (sales and marketing practices), relating to the construction of the applicable project (whether a residential solar system or other home improvement product) in conformity with applicable legal requirements and building standards and representations made to the contractor’s customers, warranty requirements and as to other legal compliance requirements. The contractor program agreements also describe the process for submitting loan applications and for obtaining funding through Orange®. The agreements include the funding terms for a given contractor (the percentage of funding provided at specific points of project development), the specific loan products available to the contractor and the related dealer fee charged to the contractor for each such product. Pursuant to Sunlight’s agreements with each contractor, Sunlight is entitled to charge the amount of each dealer fee agreed to between Sunlight and the contractor. The dealer fee varies based on the characteristics of the underlying loan, risk characteristics of the contractor and the level of funded loan volume generated by the contractor. Sunlight retains the applicable dealer fee from amounts payable by Sunlight to the contractor to fund the relevant loan balance. Loan products and dealer fees on loan products are subject to change by Sunlight upon meeting certain advance notice requirements and only with respect to customers that are not yet credit approved for a loan offered by Sunlight as of the date of such change.

Sunlight’s agreements with its contractors contain cross indemnities and include indemnities of Sunlight’s capital providers as third party beneficiaries in the event the capital provider experiences losses or other damages associated with the contractor’s breach of their agreement. For contractors participating in Sunlight’s advance program, the agreement establishes additional remedies for Sunlight to recoup advances not timely reimbursed to Sunlight by the contractor.

Sunlight has also entered into agreements with equipment distributors and referral partners to assist in the accumulation of quality contractors for Sunlight’s networks. These programs provide special features and pricing to the contractor customers of these distributors or referral partners that join Sunlight’s network through these programs. These arrangements have been material drivers of the growth in Sunlight’s network of contractors and Sunlight’s funded loan volume and revenue.

As of December 31, 2020, Sunlight has partnered with over 1,200 contractors nationwide. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Sunlight’s top five and top ten contractors accounted for approximately 35% and 42%, respectively, of Sunlight’s total funded loan volume, as compared to 35% and 46%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of June 30, 2021, Sunlight has partnered with over 1,500 contractors nationwide. For the six months ended June 30, 2021, Sunlight’s top five and top ten contractors accounted for approximately 40% and 46%, respectively, of Sunlight’s total funded loan volume, as compared to 38% and 44%, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2020. While the percentage of Sunlight’s funded loan

114

TABLE OF CONTENTS

volume sold by any contractor in Sunlight’s network varies from period to period, there is one contractor, Sunpro, that sold more than 10% of Sunlight’s funded loan volume in both 2019 and 2020 (comprising 11.2% and 15.4% of funded loan volumes in 2019 and 2020, respectively), and in the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, Sunpro sold 15.1% and 16.9% of Sunlight’s funded loan volume in those periods, respectively. A contributing factor to Sunlight’s ability to seamlessly engage with new contractors and expand its existing relationships has been the development and continuous improvement of standardized agreements with contractors that provide flexibility for Sunlight’s expanding product offerings and services. Sunlight has developed contractor agreements that cover both solar and home improvement contractor relationships. Sunlight’s standardized agreements with contractors generally provide for a term of one year, which renews automatically for successive one-year periods unless either party provides 60 days’ prior written notice of termination prior to the renewal term. In addition, Sunlight’s standardized agreements with contractors generally permit termination for convenience with 60 days’ prior written notice of termination, subject to certain conditions and additional rights of termination under limited circumstances, or upon shorter notice period for “cause.” Two of Sunlight’s contractor program agreements contain most favored nation clauses (“MFNs”) related to the dealer fees charged to other contractors on loan products also offered by one or the other of these two contractors. The MFNs are crafted such that they are not often triggered and though these contracts have been in place for several years the MFNs have not caused Sunlight any material loss of revenue.

Sunlight’s contractor program agreements generally do not have change-in-control or notice provisions triggered by the Business Combination; however, such contracts generally do prohibit assignment by either party without the prior written consent of the other party, provided, that Sunlight has limited rights to assign without the approval of the contractor under limited circumstances. The Business Combination did not constitute an assignment under applicable law or otherwise provide any contractor any special right to terminate, renegotiate or alter any contractual agreements with Sunlight.

Competitive Overview

Competition to Acquire and Maintain Contractor Relationships

Competition to obtain contractor relationships is significant. Contractors generally do not enter exclusive relationships with residential solar loan providers and Sunlight’s agreements with its network of contractors do not provide for exclusive relationships. Contractors may offer loan products from Sunlight, as well as from Sunlight’s competitors, and generally select between loan providers based on pricing (original issue discount charged), consumer credit approval rates, variety of loan products to address shifting consumer demands and market conditions, ease of loan application and completion process (platform) and other services to facilitate the contractor’s business).

Sunlight believes that the following factors, among others, are key to Sunlight’s success in acquiring and maintaining contractor relationships:

•

Superior value proposition for contractors. Sunlight’s large array of loan products and flexibility in offering new and additional products stem from the depth, diversity and attractively-priced funding of Sunlight’s capital providers. Sunlight loan products allow contractors to capture additional purchase opportunities from consumers that do not want to or are not able to pay cash for solar system installation or do not want to lease a system from a third party and forego the benefits of ownership. Sunlight’s attractive loan products and competitive dealer fees allow contractors to choose products that fit their business needs and the financing needs of their customers. The broad range of products offered by Sunlight improves the contractor’s chances of meeting its customers’ financing needs and completing a sale.

•

115

TABLE OF CONTENTS

close financing transactions through an intuitive and easy process through the execution of loan agreements in one encounter with a potential customer provides significant additional sale opportunities for contractors. Orange® may be accessed via the Orange® web address, directly from certain contractor’s own website via a flexible application programming interface, or API, and via Sunlight’s mobile App. Besides instant credit decisioning, Orange® includes automated loan stipulation clearance, secure document upload, e-sign capacity and other features that facilitate efficient loan transactions and provide contractors with the ability to grow their businesses.

•

Competition to Acquire Capital to Fund Loans

Sunlight believes that it offers capital providers an attractive value proposition due to its industry-leading consumer credit underwriting, attractive risk-adjusted returns earned by its capital providers relative to other asset classes, the access that the Sunlight Platform provides to a unique and growing asset class that may reduce volatility in the ability to deploy capital, and the ability to access new customers for very little cost. Sunlight has successfully added capital providers and grown commitments from existing capital providers since inception. As its contractor network has grown, Sunlight has consistently diversified its capital provider base to ensure that it has sufficient capital to fund the demand for Sunlight facilitated loans and that it is able to offer an evolving competitive mix of loan products to meet contractor and consumer demand. Capital providers have actively participated in this success and Sunlight has not experienced any capital provider attrition since inception. Sunlight believes that there are many institutions seeking to deploy capital into solar and home improvement loan assets, but Sunlight intends to continue to be selective about adding capital provider partners. Sunlight values diversification but will specifically focus on partnering with potential capital providers that can enable Sunlight to meet strategic goals, including access to the most attractive pricing and access to capacity for a growing suite of loan products, among others.

Employees

As of June 30, 2021, Sunlight employed 220 employees, including 214 full-time employees, 2 part-time employees, 3 part-time interns and 1 contractor through Sunlight’s “Hiring Our Heroes” program, with substantially all employees located in either Charlotte, North Carolina or New York, New York. None of Sunlight’s employees are currently represented by a labor union or have terms of employment that are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. Sunlight considers its relationships with its employees to be good and has not experienced any work stoppages.

Government Regulation and Licensing

Sunlight’s business requires compliance with several regulatory regimes, including those applicable to consumer lending at both the federal and state levels. Many of these requirements relate to regulations primarily applicable to Sunlight’s capital providers, but the program agreements with those capital providers allocate varying degrees of compliance risk through representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities to Sunlight. Sunlight is subject to the regulations of the National Credit Union Administration, the FDIC, the

116

TABLE OF CONTENTS

enforcement regimes of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the federal and state attorneys general. Sunlight also has various forms of lender licenses in 23 states and is therefore also subject to the supervisory oversight of the financial regulators in those jurisdictions.

Sunlight has established a robust set of policies and procedures to comply with federal regulations such as the Truth in Lending Act, Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated thereunder, Fair Credit Reporting Act, as amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, Anti-Money Laundering, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Service Member’s Civil Relief Act, and Unfair, Deceptive, and Abusive Acts and Practices as well as the California Consumer Privacy Act. Sunlight must also comply with laws and judicial and regulatory interpretations with respect to certain state laws applicable to its capital providers in states where they are licensed to market, sell and fund solar loans through the Sunlight Platform. Certain of Sunlight’s contractual obligations with contractors, capital providers and other stakeholders may place additional compliance parameters on Sunlight’s operations that may be more stringent than applicable laws. Other states are also in the process of developing additional data privacy laws associated with the delivery of protected information through electronic means, including Orange®, similar to the law adopted by the State of California. Depending on the reach and scope of these laws if and when adopted, Sunlight may also be subject to these requirements.

Legal Proceedings

As a participant in the consumer loan industry, Sunlight is from time to time engaged in legal proceedings with borrowers or potential borrowers. Sunlight has also from time to time been involved in lawsuits related to employees. These lawsuits have not been at any time material, either individually or in the aggregate. As of the date of this prospectus, Sunlight is not party to any legal proceedings that are material, either individually or in the aggregate. In the future, Sunlight may become party to legal matters and claims arising in the ordinary course of business, the resolution of which Sunlight does not anticipate would have a material adverse impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Intellectual Property

Sunlight seeks to protect its intellectual property by relying on a combination of federal, state, and common law rights in the United States, as well as on contractual measures. Sunlight protects its trademarks throughout the U.S. by making applicable trademark filings and further protects is trademarks and trade secrets via contractual provisions clearly establishing rights of use and Sunlight’s ability to terminate those rights, robust confidentiality provisions and other similar agreements. Sunlight also places appropriate restrictions on its Proprietary Information to control access and prevent unauthorized disclosures, a key part of its broader risk management strategy.

Sunlight has registered 13 trademarks and has six pending applications for registration with the United States Patent and Trademark Office including, among others, registration of its name, “Sunlight Financial,” “Orange®,” Sunlight’s logo and other trade names for loan products or innovations developed and offered by Sunlight. Sunlight also owns seven domain names that it uses in its business. In addition, Sunlight has filed two provisional process method patent applications.

Facilities

Sunlight leases its office space, which consists of (i) approximately 24,000 square feet located in 101 N. Tryon Street, Suite 1000, Charlotte, North Carolina 28246; and (ii) 8,229 square feet located in 234 West 39th Street, 7th Floor, New York, New York 10018. Sunlight’s lease for the office space located in Charlotte, NC expires in June 2025 and the lease for the office space located in New York, New York expires in October 2022. Sunlight believes its current office space is sufficient to meet its current needs. However, Sunlight anticipates that it will need to expand its facilities from time to time. Sunlight believes that it will be able to expand its facilities as and when needed. Sunlight does not own any properties.

117

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT

Executive Officers and Directors

The business and affairs of Sunlight are managed by or under the direction of the Sunlight Board. In accordance with the Investor Rights Agreement, the Sunlight Board consists of nine (9) members that are divided into three classes (Class I, Class II and Class III) serving staggered three-year terms, with the term of Class I to be reelected in 2022, Class II to be reelected in 2023 and Class III to be reelected in 2024. Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, (i) Brad Bernstein is serving as the director nominated by the FTV Parties pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement; (ii) Emil W. Henry, Jr. is serving as the director nominated by the Tiger Parties pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement as well as Chairman of the Sunlight Board; (iii) Jennifer D. Nordquist and Kenneth Shea are serving as directors nominated by the Sponsor, each of whom qualifies as an independent director under the listing rules of the NYSE and applicable SEC rules; and (iv) Jeanette Gorgas, Toan Huynh, Philip Ryan and Joshua Siegel are serving as directors nominated by the Sunlight LLC equityholders pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, each of whom qualifies as an independent director under the listing rules of the NYSE and applicable SEC rules. The Sunlight Board has appointed Mr. Shea to serve as lead independent director until the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders. At each annual meeting of stockholders commencing with the annual meeting in 2023, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following election. The management team of Sunlight is composed of the management team of Sunlight LLC immediately prior to Closing.

The following table lists the names, ages as of December 31, 2020 and positions of the individuals who are serving as directors and executive officers of Sunlight:

Name	Age	Position(s)
Executive Officers
Matthew Potere	45	Chief Executive Officer and Director (Class III)
Barry Edinburg	53	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Nora Dahlman	55	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Timothy Parsons	43	Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Scott Mulloy	50	Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Non-Employee Directors
Brad Bernstein	54	Director (Class II)
Jeanette Gorgas	52	Director (Class I)(2)
Emil W. Henry, Jr.	60	Director (Class II)
Toan Huynh	45	Director (Class III)(1)(3)
Jennifer D. Nordquist	53	Director (Class II)(2)(3)
Philip Ryan	65	Director (Class III)(1)
Kenneth Shea	63	Director (Class I)(2)
Joshua Siegel	50	Director (Class I)(1)(3)

(1)

Member of the Audit Committee.

(2)

Member of the Compensation Committee.

(3)

Member of the Nominating, Governance & ESG Committee.

Executive Officers

Matthew Potere. Mr. Potere is the Chief Executive Officer and a Class III member of the Sunlight Board. Mr. Potere served as Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors for Sunlight LLC from 2015 until consummation of the Business Combination. Prior to Sunlight LLC, Mr. Potere served as

118

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a Senior Vice President responsible for Bank of America, N.A.’s home equity product from 2012 to 2015. Prior to Bank of America, Mr. Potere served as the Chief Operating Officer of Swift Financial from 2007 to 2010, and in various senior credit, marketing and operations roles at MBNA America Bank, N.A. from 1995 to 2006. Mr. Potere holds a B.A. in Criminal Justice from the University of Delaware. Sunlight believes Mr. Potere is qualified to serve as a member of the Sunlight Board due to his extensive executive management and lending industry leadership experience.

Barry Edinburg. Mr. Edinburg is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sunlight. Mr. Edinburg served as Sunlight LLC’s Chief Financial Officer from 2016 until consummation of the Business Combination. Prior to Sunlight LLC, Mr. Edinburg served as Chief Financial Officer of Spruce Finance Inc. from 2015 to 2016 and in the same role at Kilowatt Financial LLC from 2013 until the time of its merger with Clean Power Finance, Inc. to form Spruce Finance. Prior to Kilowatt Financial, Mr. Edinburg was a Managing Director at Fortress Investment Group from 2004 to 2012, where he was responsible for both making and managing private equity investments in financial services and other business and generally for the capital markets activities of portfolio companies. Mr. Edinburg holds a B.A. in Psychology from Tufts University and a J.D. from the Boston University School of Law.

Timothy Parsons. Mr. Parsons is the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Sunlight. Mr. Parsons served as Sunlight LLC’s Chief Operating Officer from 2016 until consummation of the Business Combination and was responsible for Sunlight LLC’s credit risk management and operations. Prior to Sunlight LLC, Mr. Parsons served as Director of Risk at Citigroup, Inc. from May 2011 to February 2016, where he led risk management for Citi’s Sears credit card portfolio. Prior to Citigroup, Inc., Mr. Parsons served in various senior credit, operations and analytics roles at Swift Financial, LLC, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and MBNA America Bank, N.A. Mr. Parsons holds a B.S. in Finance from the University of Delaware.

Scott Mulloy. Mr. Mulloy is the Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Sunlight. Mr. Malloy served as Sunlight LLC’s Chief Information Officer from 2017 until consummation of the Business Combination. Prior to Sunlight LLC, Mr. Mulloy served as Chief Technology Officer of JVL Ventures, LLC d/b/a Softcard from 2011 to 2015, and in various leadership positions at GE Capital, including as Chief Information Officer of GE Retail Finance and GE Commercial Finance, from 1994 to 2011. Mr. Mulloy holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Clarkson University.

Nora Dahlman. Ms. Dahlman is the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Sunlight. Ms. Dahlman served as Sunlight LLC’s General Counsel from 2017 until consummation of the Business Combination. Prior to Sunlight LLC, Ms. Dahlman served as an Assistant General Counsel and the Head of Structured Financial Legal Section at Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2008 to 2017. Prior to Wells Fargo, Ms. Dahlman served as General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary of ACA Capital Holdings, Inc. from 2003 to 2008, and as First Vice President and Assistant General Counsel for Ambac Assurance Corporation from 1998 to 2001. Ms. Dahlman holds a B.A. in Political Science from Gonzaga University and a J.D. from the Vanderbilt University School of Law.

Non-Employee Directors

Brad Bernstein. Mr. Bernstein is managing partner of FTV Capital and leads the sector-focused growth equity investment firm. Mr. Bernstein has over 30 years of private equity experience. Prior to FTV Capital, Mr. Bernstein was a partner at Oak Hill Capital Management and its predecessors where he managed the business and financial services group. He began his private equity career with Patricof & Company Ventures and started his professional career in the investment banking division of Merrill Lynch in New York. Mr. Bernstein also currently serves as a director of MarketsandMarkets, a research company. Mr. Bernstein received a B.A. magna cum laude from Tufts University.

Jeanette Gorgas. Ms. Gorgas is a board director and C-Suite executive with 25+ years of expertise in growth strategy, operations and human capital management. Her unique blend of experience has accelerated organizational performance and driven transformational growth in private and public companies, in the U.S. and on an international stage. Ms. Gorgas is a member of the Supervisory Board of Delivery Hero (DLVHF), where she chairs the Strategy Committee and is a member of the Nomination Committee. Ms. Gorgas also sits on the Board of Directors of Youth INC, and is a member of the Audit

119

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and Nominating & Governance committees. From November 2019 to December 2020, Ms. Gorgas was Consultant & Chief Human Capital Officer at Valor Equity Partners, responsible for leading human capital solutions in portfolio operations, and developing and overseeing best practices to enable growth and scale at the firm. Before joining Valor, from July 2015 to November 2018, Ms. Gorgas was Chief Strategy Officer of Grant Thornton, and built and led the Office of Strategy Management. Her role at Grant Thornton included leading a team of 65 people in strategic planning, mergers & acquisitions, alliances, strategic initiative execution, knowledge management technology, change management and corporate social responsibility. Ms. Gorgas has held senior officer roles in Deutsche Bank, Bank of America and Weil, Gotshal & Manges, with ever-increasing responsibilities. She also served as Senior Associate Dean for Yale University, leading all facets of the MBA Program at Yale School of Management. Ms. Gorgas graduated with high honors from London School of Economics with a Master of Science (MSc) in Management. She earned a Bachelor of Science degree from Rutgers’ College School of Business, and attended Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management and Women on Boards programs.

Emil W. Henry, Jr. Mr. Henry is the CEO and Founder of Tiger Infrastructure Partners, a private equity firm focused on growth-oriented infrastructure investment opportunities. Prior to founding Tiger Infrastructure Partners, he was Global Head of the Lehman Brothers Private Equity Infrastructure businesses, where he oversaw global infrastructure investments. In 2005, Mr. Henry was unanimously confirmed by the United States Senate as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Financial Institutions by the President of the United States. Until his departure in 2007, he was a key advisor to two Treasury Secretaries on economic, legislative and regulatory matters affecting U.S. financial institutions and markets. Before joining the Treasury, Mr. Henry was a partner of Gleacher Partners LLC, an investment banking and investment management firm, where he served as Chairman of Asset Management, and Managing Director, and where he oversaw the firm’s investment activities. Mr. Henry began the formative part of his career at Morgan Stanley in the mid-1980s in that firm’s merchant banking arm where he executed management buyouts for Morgan Stanley’s flagship private equity fund. He holds an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and a B.A. in Economics from Yale University.

Toan Huynh. Ms. Huynh has spent over 20 years working at the intersection of financial services and technology, leading large digital transformation projects for global 1000 firms. In 2008, she co-founded and served as Head of Insurance and Financial Services for Global One/Cloud Sherpas, a global cloud advisory firm, which was acquired by Accenture in 2015. Ms. Huynh remained as a Managing Director with Accenture’s CloudFirst Practice until 2018, while running various innovation programs including the Fintech Innovation Lab with the Partnership Fund for New York City and launching the Liquid Studios for Innovation. After spending over fifteen years investing in early stage companies, in 2018, she joined Citi Ventures as an Entrepreneur-in-Residence to launch new financial products within the Consumer Bank and Institutional Corporate Group divisions. In addition, she joined Information VP as the US-based partner, investing in B2B SaaS, financial services technologies, and enterprise technologies in North America and advising as a growth advisor until 2020. She has served on the board of Flagstar Bank since December 2020 and the board of Bankers Financial Corporation since 2015, and continues to support high growth IT services and technology companies as a growth and operating advisor. Ms. Huynh holds a BA from the University of Pennsylvania in International Relations and Economics. She is a frequent speaker/mentor in startup and venture programs including FIS Venture Studio, Global Insurance Accelerator and Female Funders. In her spare time, Toan seeks to link the arts as a bridge to a common language, volunteering with OpeningAct.org, WordswithoutBorders.org, and Lincoln Center Innovation Center. She is also on the Board of Trustees for The Ethel Walker School for Girls.

Jennifer D. Nordquist. Ms. Nordquist has 30 years of experience in public policy, research, and government. She is currently a Dean’s DC Fellow at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business, where she engages in the Darden classroom as guest speaker and co-teaches, participates in roundtable discussions, and contributes thought leadership articles. She is also an Advisory Board Member at ClearPath, whose mission to develop and advance policies that accelerate breakthrough innovations that reduce emissions in the energy and industrial sectors using cutting-edge policy solutions. She also serves on the Advisory Board of Big Sun Holdings, the US affiliate of HN Inc. (formerly Hyundai BS&C) and holding company for Black Buffalo 3D Corporation and Flash Labs Corporation which specializes in smart 3D printing construction, blockchain, IoT infrastructure and IT services for smart homes, smart offices, smart factories, and smart cities. She represented the United States at the Board of Directors of the World Bank

120

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Group from 2019-2021, after being confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate. Serving as the World Bank’s largest shareholder, she helped steer the World Bank’s COVID-19 response, as well as working with G7, G20, and Paris Club on the Debt Service Suspension Initiative. Her work focused on environmental and social frameworks (ESF), UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), and gender. In addition, she pushed the World Bank to pilot the use of blockchain to prevent elite capture, forced a review of information and communication technologies (ICT) safeguards and procurement, and was a Member of the Audit Committee, the Committee on Development Effectiveness, and the Committee on Governance. She holds a BA from Stanford University and an MS from Northwestern University. She speaks French, and has some knowledge of Italian and Thai. She received the Distinguished Service Award from US Department of the Treasury and was named Stanford Associate by Board of Governors for outstanding alumni volunteer service (top 1 percent).

Philip Ryan. Mr. Ryan has served on the board of directors of Swiss Re Americas Holding Corporation since 2010 and as Chairman since 2012. Mr. Ryan joined the Board of Directors of Swiss Re Ltd, the parent company, in April 2015. He also served as an Adjunct Professor at the NYU Stern School of Business from 2013 to 2018. Mr. Ryan served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Power Corporation of Canada and Power Financial Corporation in Montreal from January 2008 to May 2012 and in that capacity served on the board and committees of IGM Financial, Great West Lifeco and several of their subsidiaries, including Putnam Investments. Prior to that Mr. Ryan served as an officer of Credit Suisse Group in New York, London and Zurich from 1985 to 2008 in a variety of roles, including Chairman of the Financial Institutions Group (UK), Chief Financial Officer of Credit Suisse Group (Switzerland), Chief Financial Officer of Credit Suisse Asset Management (UK) and Managing Director of CSFB Financial Institutions Group (USA/UK). Mr. Ryan is also engaged in a number of charitable activities including the Smithsonian National Board. Mr. Ryan received a B.S. from the University of Illinois School of Engineering and an M.B.A. from the Indiana University Kelly Graduate School of Business.

Kenneth Shea. Mr. Shea is currently an independent consultant and an investor. Mr. Shea served as Senior Managing Director at Guggenheim Securities, LLC from 2014 to 2019. Prior to joining Guggenheim Securities, LLC, Mr. Shea served as President of Coastal Capital Management LLC from 2009 until 2014, and Managing Director for Icahn Capital LP from 2008 to 2009. Mr. Shea currently sits on the Board of Directors of Viskase Companies, Inc., a food packaging and service company, where he is a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Shea also serves on the Advisory Board of WhyHotel, a privately-held, venture-backed real estate company. Previously, Mr. Shea served on the board of trustees of Equity Commonwealth, a commercial office REIT, where he was Chairman of the Compensation Committee, and on the board of Hydra Industries, a special purpose acquisition company, and CVR Refining, a mid-continent refiner. Mr. Shea received his M.B.A. from the University of Virginia and his B.A. in Economics from Boston College. We believe Mr. Shea is qualified to serve as a member of the board of directors due to his extensive experience in corporate finance and financial services and his knowledge of the capital markets.

Joshua Siegel. Mr. Siegel founded StoneCastle Partners, LLC in 2003 and serves as Managing Partner, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. He is widely regarded as a leading expert and investor in the banking industry. As Head of Innovation and Chief Imagineer of StoneCastle, Mr. Siegel is responsible for numerous first-of-their-kind products and has a unique eye for finding innovative solutions that solve for the myriad of banking and SEC regulations that might otherwise limit our activities. During Mr. Siegel’s career, his innovations have brought nearly $40 billion of capital and $25 billion of deposits to more than 1,600 community and regional banks. He was an adjunct professor at Columbia Business School, where he lectured on imagineering in financial services. Mr. Siegel has provided strategic advice to the Global Food Banking Network. He also provides annual economic support to Prep for Prep to make sure academic brilliance is recognized and nurtured without regard to a student’s economic, demographic or sociological impediments. Mr. Siegel received his BS in Management and Accounting from Tulane University. He is a member of the Young Presidents Organization and Mensa.

Family Relationships

There are no familial relationships among the Sunlight directors and executive officers.

121

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Board Composition

In accordance with the Investors Rights Agreement, the Second A&R Charter and the bylaws, in each case, the Sunlight Board is comprised of nine directors and is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following election. Sunlight’s directors are divided among the three classes as follows:

•

the Class I directors are Jeanette Gorgas, Kenneth Shea and Joshua Siegel, and their terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2022;

•

the Class II directors are Brad Bernstein, Emil W. Henry, Jr. and Jennifer D. Nordquist, and their terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2023; and

•

the Class III directors are Toan Huynh, Matthew Potere and Philip Ryan, and their terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2024.

Directors in a particular class will be elected for three-year terms at the annual meeting of stockholders in the year in which their terms expire. As a result, only one class of directors will be elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders, with the other classes continuing for the remainder of their respective three-year terms. Each director’s term continues until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or the earlier of his or her death, resignation or removal. Biographical information for these individuals is set forth above.

The Second A&R Charter and the bylaws provide that only the Sunlight Board can fill vacant directorships, including newly-created seats. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors will be distributed pro rata among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of the authorized number of directors.

Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement: (i) if the Sponsor and its affiliates collectively beneficially own at least 50% of the number of shares of Common Stock as such persons owned immediately following the Closing, the Sponsor may designate one nominee; (ii) if FTV Blocker Holder and its affiliates collectively beneficially own at least 50% of the number of shares of Common Stock as such persons owned immediately following the Closing, FTV Blocker Holder may designate one nominee; and (iii) if Tiger and its affiliates collectively beneficially own at least 50% of the number of shares of Common Stock as such persons owned immediately following the Closing, Tiger may designate one nominee.

The directors nominated by the Sponsor (the “Spartan Sponsor Directors”) are Jennifer D. Nordquist and Kenneth Shea, the director nominated by the Tiger Parties (the “Tiger Director”) is Emil W. Henry, Jr. and the director nominated by the FTV Parties (the “FTV Director”) is Brad Bernstein. In the event that a vacancy is created on the Sunlight Board at any time by the death, disability, resignation or removal of a Spartan Sponsor Director, a FTV Director or a Tiger Director, then (i) the Sponsor, with respect to a vacancy created by the death, disability, resignation or removal of a Spartan Sponsor Director, (ii) the FTV Parties, with respect to a vacancy created by the death, disability, resignation or removal of a FTV Director, or (iii) the Tiger Parties, with respect to a vacancy created by the death, disability, resignation or removal of a Tiger Director, is entitled to designate an individual to fill the vacancy so long as the total number of persons that will serve on the Sunlight Board as designees of the Sponsor, the FTV Parties or the Tiger Parties, as applicable, immediately following the filling of such vacancy does exceed the total number of persons the Sponsor, the FTV Parties or the Tiger Parties, as applicable, is entitled to designate pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement. In the event that a Spartan Sponsor Director, a FTV Director or a Tiger Director is then on the Sunlight Board and the Sponsor, the FTV Parties or the Tiger Parties, respectively, is no longer entitled to designate a director, to the extent requested by the Sunlight Board, the Sponsor, the FTV Parties or the Tiger Parties, as applicable, will promptly use its reasonable best efforts to cause a Spartan Sponsor Director, FTV Director or Tiger Director, as applicable, to resign from service on the Sunlight Board and all committees thereof on which such director then serves, and promptly thereafter Sunlight will reduce the size of the Sunlight Board by one director.

Director Independence

Each member of the Sunlight Board, other than those continuing from the Sunlight LLC Board (Matthew Potere, Emil W. Henry, Jr. and Brad Bernstein) qualify as independent, as defined under the listing rules of the NYSE and applicable SEC rules. In addition, Sunlight Financial Holdings is subject to

122

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the rules of the SEC and NYSE relating to the memberships, qualifications and operations of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating, Governance & ESG Committee as discussed below. The Sunlight Board has appointed Mr. Shea to serve as lead independent director until the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.

Board Oversight of Risk

One of the key functions of the Sunlight Board is informed oversight of Sunlight’s risk management process. The Sunlight Board does not have a risk management committee and does not anticipate having a standing risk management committee, but rather anticipates administering this oversight function directly through the Sunlight Board as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of the Sunlight Board that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. For example, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks associated with Sunlight’s financial reporting, accounting and auditing matters; the Compensation Committee will oversee the management of risks associated with Sunlight’s compensation policies and programs.

Board Committees

The Sunlight Board has established the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating, Governance & ESG Committee. The Sunlight Board may establish other committees to facilitate the management of Sunlight’s business. The Sunlight Board and its committees will set schedules for meetings throughout the year and can also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time, as appropriate. The Sunlight Board have delegated various responsibilities and authority to its committees as generally described below. The committees will regularly report on their activities and actions to the full board of directors. Each member of each committee of the Sunlight Board qualifies as an independent director in accordance with the listing standards of the NYSE. Each committee of the Sunlight Board has a written charter approved by the Sunlight Board. Copies of each charter are posted on Sunlight’s website at https://sunlightfinancial.com/investors under the Leadership & Governance section. The inclusion of Sunlight’s website address in this prospectus does not include or incorporate by reference the information on Sunlight’s website into this prospectus. Members will serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by the Sunlight Board.

Audit Committee

The members of the Audit Committee are Toan Huynh, Philip Ryan and Joshua Siegel, each of whom can read and understand fundamental financial statements. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent under the rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE applicable to audit committee members. Philip Ryan is the chair of the Audit Committee. Philip Ryan qualifies as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of SEC regulations and meets the financial sophistication requirements of the NYSE. The Audit Committee assists the Sunlight Board with its oversight of, among other things, the following: (i) the integrity of Sunlight’s financial statements; (ii) Sunlight’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm; and (iv) the design and implementation of Sunlight’s internal audit function and risk assessment and risk management. Among other things, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing with Sunlight’s management the adequacy and effectiveness of Sunlight’s disclosure controls and procedures. The Audit Committee will also discuss with Sunlight’s management and independent registered public accounting firm the annual audit plan and scope of audit activities, scope and timing of the annual audit of Sunlight’s financial statements, and the results of the audit, quarterly reviews of Sunlight’s financial statements and, as appropriate, will initiate inquiries into certain aspects of Sunlight’s financial affairs. The Audit Committee is responsible for establishing and overseeing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of any complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, as well as for the confidential and anonymous submissions by Sunlight’s employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. In addition, the Audit Committee has direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of Sunlight’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has sole authority to approve the hiring and discharging of Sunlight’s independent registered public accounting firm, all audit engagement terms and fees, all permissible non-audit engagements with the independent auditor and pre-approvals of any

123

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of the foregoing. The Audit Committee will review and oversee all related person transactions in accordance with Sunlight’s policies and procedures.

Compensation Committee

The members of the Compensation Committee are Jeanette Gorgas, Jennifer D. Nordquist and Kenneth Shea. Jeanette Gorgas is the chair of the Compensation Committee. Each member of the Compensation Committee is considered independent under the rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE applicable to compensation committee members. The Compensation Committee assists the Sunlight Board in discharging certain of Sunlight’s responsibilities with respect to compensating Sunlight’s executive officers, and the administration and review of Sunlight’s equity compensation and other incentive plans for employees and other service providers, and certain other matters related to Sunlight’s compensation programs.

Nominating, Governance & ESG Committee

The members of Nominating, Governance & ESG Committee of the Sunlight Board are Toan Huynh, Jennifer D. Nordquist and Joshua Siegel. Toan Huynh is the chair of the Nominating, Governance & ESG Committee. The Nominating, Governance & ESG Committee assists the Sunlight Board with its oversight of and identification of individuals qualified to become members of the Sunlight Board, consistent with criteria approved by the Sunlight Board and the Investor Rights Agreement, and select, or recommend that the Sunlight Board select, director nominees, develop and recommend to the Sunlight Board a set of corporate governance guidelines, and oversee the evaluation of the Sunlight Board.

Code of Conduct

The Sunlight Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct & Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”), effective as of July 9, 2021. The Code of Conduct applies to all of Sunlight’s employees, officers and directors, as well as all of Sunlight’s contractors, consultants, suppliers and agents in connection with their work for Sunlight. The Code of Conduct clarifies (i) the types of permitted conduct under such code, including business activities and opportunities and (ii) procedures for the reporting, oversight and investigation of alleged violations of the Code of Conduct. The full text of Sunlight’s Code of Conduct is posted on Sunlight’s website at https://sunlightfinancial.com/investors under the Leadership & Governance section. Sunlight intends to disclose future amendments to, or waivers of, Sunlight’s Code of Conduct, as and to the extent required by SEC regulations, at the same location on Sunlight’s website identified above or in public filings with the SEC from time to time. Information contained on Sunlight’s website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus, and you should not consider information contained on Sunlight’s website to be part of this prospectus. See also Exhibit 14.1 to this prospectus for the full text of the Code of Conduct.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the Compensation Committee has ever been a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has or has had one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Sunlight Board or Compensation Committee.

Board Observer Rights

In addition to the rights of the Sponsor, FTV Parties and the Tiger Parties to nominate directors to serve on the Sunlight Board, each such party also has the right to appoint one non-voting board observer (each, a “Board Observer”) for so long as each such party, respectively, is entitled to designate a nominee to serve on the Sunlight Board pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement. Each Board Observer shall have the right to attend all meetings of the Sunlight Board in a non-voting, observer capacity and, subject to certain exceptions, receive copies of all notices, minutes, consents and other materials that Sunlight provides to the Sunlight Board in the same manner as such materials are provided to the Sunlight Board. The Sponsor, FTV Parties and Tiger Parties are not permitted to transfer the right to appoint a Board Observer. A Board Observer will not be entitled to vote on any matter submitted to the Sunlight Board nor to offer any motions or resolutions to the Sunlight Board. Each Board Observer shall be subject to the same obligations as the members of the Sunlight Board with respect to confidentiality and conflicts of interest.

124

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

As an emerging growth company, we have opted to comply with the executive compensation disclosure rules applicable to “smaller reporting companies” as such term is defined in the rules promulgated under the Securities Act, which require compensation disclosure for its principal executive officer and its two other most highly compensated executive officers.

Sunlight

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, Sunlight’s named executive officers were:

Matthew Potere, Chief Executive Officer;

Barry Edinburg, Chief Financial Officer; and

Timothy Parsons, Chief Operating Officer.

Sunlight’s Chief Executive Officer is Personally Invested in Sunlight

Mr. Potere invested a portion of his personal net worth in Class A Units of Sunlight LLC. The former Sunlight LLC board considered the Class A Units held by Mr. Potere to be an investment rather than compensation, because he purchased the units at market prices using personal funds. Consequently, the values attributable to the Class A Units held by Mr. Potere and any distributions made with respect to those units, including any distributions paid in-kind, are not included in the Summary Compensation Table.

Fiscal Year 2020 Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows information regarding the compensation of Sunlight’s named executive officers for services performed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		All Other Compensation(1) ($)		Total ($)
Matthew Potere, Chief Executive Officer		2020		300,000		225,000		35,869		560,869
Barry Edinburg, Chief Financial Officer		2020		300,000		190,000		19,924		509,924
Timothy Parsons, Chief Operating Officer		2020		290,000		175,000		19,250		484,250

(1)

Represents Sunlight’s payment of $15,550 in fees associated with Mr. Potere’s membership in certain industry associations, and further represents $20,319 for Mr. Potere, $19,924 for Mr. Edinburg and $19,250 for Mr. Parsons to reimburse each of them for certain tax obligations that they bear due to Form K-1 status instead of being Form W-2 employees. One quarter of each of such reimbursement amounts were paid in January 2021 but related to the 2020 tax year.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

The compensation of Sunlight’s named executive officers generally consisted of base salary, annual incentive compensation in the form of a cash bonus, and equity compensation. In making executive compensation decisions, the former Sunlight board considered such factors as they deemed appropriate in the exercise of their discretion and business judgment, including a subjective assessment of the named executive officer’s performance, the amount of vested and unvested equity held by the officer, amounts paid to Sunlight’s other executive officers and competitive market conditions.

Base Salary and Annual Bonus

The salaries and target bonus opportunities of Sunlight’s named executive officers were typically reviewed annually and adjusted when the former Sunlight board determined it was appropriate pursuant to the terms of each named executive officer’s employment agreement with Sunlight (each, a “Former Sunlight Employment Agreement”). For calendar year 2020, Mr. Potere’s base salary was $300,000, Mr. Edinburg’s base salary was $300,000 and Mr. Parsons’ base salary was $290,000.

125

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Each of Sunlight’s named executive officers had a target bonus opportunity stated as a percentage of the officer’s base salary pursuant to the minimum thresholds set forth in each named executive officer’s Former Sunlight Employment Agreement. For calendar year 2020, these target bonus opportunities were 60% in the case of Mr. Potere, 50% in the case of Mr. Edinburg and 50% in the case of Mr. Parsons. Sunlight’s named executive officers’ calendar year 2020 bonuses took into account both company performance and individual performance. All annual bonus amounts, whether earned based on a subjective review of each officer’s individual performance or otherwise, are reflected in the “Bonus” column of the Fiscal Year 2020 Summary Compensation Table above.

Equity Compensation

Historically, the equity compensation granted to Sunlight’s named executive officers consisted of Class C Units, but none of Sunlight’s named executive officers received any equity awards in 2020. None of Sunlight’s named executive officers participated in the LTIP. Sunlight believed that overall business success created meaningful value to Sunlight’s equityholders and, through their holdings of Class C Units, Sunlight’s named executive officers. The Class C Units were designed as “profits interests” within the meaning of Revenue Procedures 93-27 and 2001-43, which was intended to provide an immediate and significant alignment between the named executive officers and the future success of Sunlight LLC’s business. The actual number of Class C Units and the value associated with a potential payment under the Class C Units is described in greater detail in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2020 Year-End” table below.

As profits interests, the Class C Units had no value for tax purposes on the date of grant, but instead was designed to gain value only after Sunlight LLC had made required distributions to the holders of Class A Units and Class B Units (as each term is defined in the Prior Sunlight LLC Agreement) or, in the event of a sale of Sunlight LLC or liquidation, realized minimum returns for certain Sunlight equityholders and with respect to such units.

Perquisites and Additional Benefits

Sunlight’s named executive officers were generally eligible to participate in Sunlight’s health and wellness plans and 401(k) plan (as described below) to the same extent as other full-time employees. Sunlight generally did not provide Sunlight’s named executive officers with perquisites or other personal benefits other than reimbursing Sunlight’s named executive officers for certain expenses associated with their K-1 filing status. However, Sunlight did reimburse Sunlight’s named executive officers for certain memberships in certain industry associations and their necessary and reasonable business and travel expenses incurred in connection with their services to Sunlight.

Severance and Change in Control Benefits Under Former Employment and Equity Arrangements with Sunlight’s Named Executive Officers

Sunlight had entered into the Former Sunlight Employment Agreements with each of its named executive officers, which set forth the terms of the officer’s employment and provided that the officer’s employment was “at will” and could have been terminated at any time.

Severance Benefits Under Former Employment Agreements — Termination of Employment Generally

Pursuant to the Former Sunlight Employment Agreements with each of the named executive officers, upon termination by the named executive officer for any reason or no reason, including retirement, by Sunlight for Cause (as defined below), or due to the death or disability, such officer will receive any accrued and unpaid base salary through the date of termination.

Severance Benefits Under Former Employment Agreements — Termination by Sunlight without Cause or by the Named Executive Officer for Good Reason

Under the Former Sunlight Employment Agreements with each of the named executive officers, the named executive officers were entitled to severance payments in the event of a termination without Cause (as defined below) and Mr. Edinburg was also entitled to severance payments upon his resignation for Good Reason (as defined below) as follows:

126

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

For Mr. Potere, if his employment was terminated by Sunlight without Cause (as defined below), he was entitled to receive (i) any accrued and unpaid base salary through the date of termination, (ii) six months of base salary continuation and (iii) if such termination occurred on or after the seventh month of Sunlight’s fiscal year, a prorated portion of Mr. Potere’s annual bonus for the year in which such termination occurred;

•

For Mr. Edinburg, if his employment was terminated by Sunlight without Cause (as defined below or by him for Good Reason (as defined below), he was entitled to receive (i) any accrued and unpaid base salary through the date of termination, (ii) six months of base salary continuation and (iii) if such termination occurred between January 1st and the payment of Mr. Edinburg’s annual bonus for the prior year, such annual bonus would have been paid on the date on which such other Sunlight employees received their annual bonuses; and

•

For Mr. Parsons, in the event that his employment was terminated by Sunlight without Cause (as defined below), he was entitled to receive (i) any accrued and unpaid base salary through the date of termination and (ii) six months of base salary continuation.

As a condition to the receipt of severance benefits, each of Sunlight’s named executive officers must have executed a release of claims and return all property of Sunlight. Upon any termination of or by Messrs. Potere, Edinburg and Parsons, each would have been subject to a non-competition agreement covering a period of 12 months (for Mr. Potere) or 6 months (for each of Messrs. Edinburg and Parsons) after the date of termination.

Under the Former Sunlight Employment Agreements, “Cause” generally meant the named executive officer’s (a) indictment for a felony, (b) fraudulent, grossly negligent, dishonest or unlawful conduct in connection with employment duties, (c) contravention of specific lawful directions related to a material duty or responsibility which continued for five business days following receipt of written notice, (d) breach of material obligations under the agreement or failure to comply with a material Sunlight policy, in each case, which continued for five business days following receipt of written notice, or (e) engaging in personal conduct in connection with employment duties or responsibilities which discredited or materially damaged Sunlight, or engaging in conduct that resulted in conviction or regulatory action.

With respect to Mr. Edinburg, under his Former Sunlight Employment Agreement, “Good Reason” generally meant (a) a reduction by Sunlight of Mr. Edinburg’s base salary to an amount less than $300,000, (a) a substantial and material adverse change, without Mr. Edinburg’s written consent, in his authority or duties causing Mr. Edinburg’s position to have materially less responsibility, (c) any requirement by Sunlight that Mr. Edinburg work primarily from an office or location more than 25 miles from the location stated in the employment agreement and (d) any material breach by Sunlight of any provision of Mr. Edinburg’s employment agreement.

Severance Benefits Under Former Equity Arrangements

As described under “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2020 Year-End” below, Messrs. Potere, Edinburg and Parsons each held Class C Units, which were subject to time- and performance-based vesting requirements. Pursuant to the terms of the Prior Sunlight LLC Agreement, all unvested Class C Units would have been forfeited for no consideration upon the holder of such units’ termination of employment for any reason; provided, however, if Messrs. Potere’s, Edinburg’s or Parsons’ employment was terminated by Sunlight without “Cause” or due to his resignation for “Good Reason” during the six-month period immediately preceding the date on which a final letter of intent for a “Sale of the Company” or a “Qualified Public Offering” (each as defined in the Prior Sunlight LLC Agreement) was executed, then his Class C-3 Units would have been treated as outstanding on the applicable exit event and eligible to provisionally vest (or vest in full if the applicable time-based vesting requirements had been met as of the date of such exit event) upon the occurrence of such exit event. As holders of Class C-3 Units, Messrs. Potere, Edinburg and Parsons were subject to certain post-termination restrictive covenants. See Footnote 3 to the table under “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2020 Year-End” below for a further description of the treatment of the outstanding Class C Units held by the named executive officers in connection with the Business Combination.

127

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2020 Year-End

The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by Sunlight’s named executive officers as of December 31, 2020. The vesting schedule applicable to each outstanding award is described in the footnotes to the table below.

A portion of the outstanding equity awards granted to Sunlight’s named executive officers vested immediately prior to Closing, provided that such named executive officers remained employed by Sunlight as of such time and, subject to the terms of the applicable employment agreement for each named executive officer, were not terminated for Cause or had not resigned for Good Reason, as applicable. As of December 31, 2020, the outstanding equity awards of the named executive officers were as follows:

			Option Awards(1)
Name	Grant Date		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable(2)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable(3)		Option Exercise Price ($)(4)		Option Expiration Date
Matthew Potere		9/11/2015(5)		1,612(6)		0		0		0
		9/11/2015(7)		9,834		0		0		0
		11/13/2017(8)		4,058		5,218		0		0
		6/11/2019(9)		0		50,364		0		0
Barry Edinburg		6/12/2016(10)		3,917		3,917		0		0
		11/13/2017(11)		3,300		4,244		0		0
		6/11/2019(12)		0		32,624		0
Timothy Parsons		6/1/2016(13)		1,469		1,469		0		0
		11/13/2017(14)		1,782		2,293		0		0
		6/11/2019(15)		0		22,429		0		0

(1)

Sunlight believes that, despite the fact that the Class C Units did not require the payment of an exercise price, such units are most similar economically to stock options, and as such, they are properly classified as “options” under the definition provided in Item 402(a)(6)(i) of Regulation S-K as an instrument with an “option”-like feature.

(2)

The outstanding equity awards granted to Messrs. Potere, Edinburg and Parsons are subject to various vesting requirements, including time-based requirements, performance-based requirements, and vesting requirements relating to the issuance of the Class A Preferred PIK Distribution (as defined in the Prior Sunlight LLC Agreement) (the “PIK-based vesting requirements”). The units described here have fully-vested as of December 31, 2020 by their terms.

(3)

The outstanding equity awards described here are subject to time-based, performance-based, or PIK-based vesting requirements that have not been met as of December 31, 2020. Upon the consummation of the Business Combination, all performance-based vesting requirements related to the outstanding equity awards of Messrs. Potere, Edinburg, and Parsons were met. Additionally, the time-based vesting relating to the 6/1/2016, 6/12/2016, and 11/13/2017 grants were fully accelerated pursuant to the terms of such grants. With regard to the 6/11/19 grants, the time-based vesting requirements with regard to half of the units that had not time-vested as of the Closing were fully accelerated pursuant to the terms of such grants and the remaining half of such units provisionally vested and are subject to additional time-based vesting, and release from escrow. Further, the PIK-based vesting requirements relating to certain of the units granted to Messrs. Potere, Edinburg, and Parsons on 6/11/2019 were not met at the Closing and the units that had not met such requirements were forfeited at such time.

(4)

These awards are not traditional options, and therefore, there is no exercise price or expiration date associated with them.

(5)

Mr. Potere was granted 1,900 Class B Units, which vested as follows: 977 on 2/15/2016; 608 on 2/15/2017; and 315 on 2/15/2018.

128

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(6)

Mr. Potere was originally granted equity awards for 1,900 Class B Units. Mr. Potere subsequently sold 288 Class B Units in connection with the investment by certain of the FTV Parties in Sunlight in May 2018.

(7)

Mr. Potere was granted 9,834 Class C-1 Units, which vest 25% on the first anniversary of the Grant Date and 1/48th each month thereafter.

(8)

Mr. Potere was granted 6,048 Class C-2 Units and 3,228 Class C-2AD Units, 50% of each of which are subject to time-based vesting and 50% of each of which are subject to performance-based vesting. Twenty-five percent of the time-based awards vest on 5/1/2018 with the remaining vesting 1/36th per month beginning 6/1/2018. The performance-based awards vest upon satisfaction of pre-established performance goals.

(9)

Mr. Potere was granted 24,700 Class C-3 Units and 25,664 Class C-3AD Units. The Class C-3 and Class C-3AD Units are subject to both time-based and performance-based vesting and the Class C-3AD Units are also subject to PIK-based vesting. Twenty percent of these units become provisionally time-vested on 5/25/2019, with the remaining provisionally vesting 1/48th per month beginning 6/1/2020. Provided the awards are time-vested as of the relevant exit date, 1/4 of the awards become performance-vested upon each the following performance thresholds: Exit Equity Value in excess of $330 million; $412.5 million; $495 million; and $577.5 million.

(10)

Mr. Edinburg was granted 7,834 Class C-1 Units, 50% of which are subject to time-based vesting and 50% of which are subject to performance-based vesting. Twenty-five percent of the time-based awards vest the first anniversary of the Grant Date and 1/48th each month thereafter. The performance-based awards vest upon satisfaction of pre-established performance goals.

(11)

Mr. Edinburg was granted 4,919 Class C-2 Units and 2,625 Cass C-2AD Units, 50% of each of which are subject to time-based vesting and 50% of each of which are subject to performance-based vesting. Twenty-five percent of the time-based awards vest 5/1/2018 with the remaining vesting 1/36th per month beginning 6/1/2018. The performance-based awards vest upon satisfaction of pre-established performance goals.

(12)

Mr. Edinburg was granted 16,000 Class C-3 Units and 16,624 Class C-3AD Units. The Class C-3 and Class C-3AD Units are subject to both time-based and performance-based vesting and the Class C-3AD Units are also subject to PIK-based vesting. 20% of these units become provisionally time-vested on 5/25/2019, with the remaining provisionally vesting 1/48th per month beginning 6/1/2020. Provided the awards are time-vested as of the relevant exit date, 1/4 of the awards become performance-vested upon each of the following performance thresholds: Exit Equity Value in excess of $330 million; $412.5 million; $495 million; and $577.5 million.

(13)

Mr. Parsons was granted 2,938 Class C-1 Units, 50% of which are subject to time-based vesting and 50% of which are subject to performance-based vesting. Twenty-five percent of the time-based awards vest on the first anniversary of 2/15/2016 and 1/48th each month thereafter. The performance-based awards vest upon satisfaction of pre-established performance goals.

(14)

Mr. Parsons was granted 2,657 Class C-2 Units and 1,418 Class C-2AD Units, 50% of each of which are subject to time-based vesting and 50% of each of which are subject to performance-based vesting. Twenty-five percent of the time-based awards vest 5/1/2018 with the remaining vesting 1/36th per month beginning 6/1/2018. The performance-based awards vest upon satisfaction of pre-established performance goals.

(15)

Mr. Parsons was granted 11,000 Class C-3 Units and 11,429 Class C-3AD Units. The Class C-3 and Class C-3AD Units are subject to both time-based and performance-based vesting and the Class C-3AD Units are also subject to PIK-based vesting. 20% of these units become provisionally time-vested on 5/25/2019, with the remaining provisionally vesting 1/48th per month beginning 6/1/2020. Provided the awards are time-vested as of the relevant exit date, 1/4 of the awards become performance-vested upon each of the following performance thresholds: Exit Equity Value in excess of $330 million; $412.5 million; $495 million; and $577.5 million

Additional Narrative Disclosure

401(k) Plan

Sunlight maintains a 401(k) plan for employees. The 401(k) plan is intended to qualify under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Service Code, so that contributions to the 401(k) plan by employeesor

129

TABLE OF CONTENTS

by Sunlight, and the investment earnings thereon, are not taxable to the employees until withdrawn, and so that contributions made by Sunlight, if any, will be deductible by Sunlight when made. Employees may elect to reduce their current compensation by up to the statutorily prescribed annual limits and to have the amount of such reduction contributed to their 401(k) plans. The 401(k) plan permits Sunlight to make contributions up to the limits allowed by law on behalf of all eligible employees. Beginning in February 2021, Sunlight began matching 401(k) plan contributions by all employees at 50% of an employee’s contributions, up to 3% of such employee’s base salary per year.

Executive Compensation After Closing

2021 Equity Incentive Plan and 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Sunlight adopted the 2021 Plan and the ESPP, in which Sunlight’s named executive officers are eligible to participate. Each of Matthew Potere, Barry Edinburg and Timothy Parsons, Sunlight’s principal executive officer and its next two most highly compensated executive officers, who are referred to herein as the “named executive officers,” will be eligible to participate in both the 2021 Plan and the ESPP. For a complete description of the 2021 Plan and the ESPP, please refer to the complete text of the 2021 Plan and the ESPP, each of which is filed as an exhibit to this prospectus.

New Employment Agreements for Named Executive Officers

We have entered into a new employment agreement with each of the named executive officers (each, a “New Sunlight Employment Agreement” and collectively, the “New Sunlight Employment Agreements”) that became effective at Closing. Pursuant to the New Sunlight Employment Agreements, each of the named executive officers have the following position at Sunlight LLC and Sunlight Financial Holdings (collectively, the “Employer”): Mr. Potere — Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Edinburg — Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Parsons — Chief Operating Officer. The New Sunlight Employment Agreements do not have a fixed term and may be terminated at any time in accordance with their terms. Upon any termination of employment, Messrs. Potere, Edinburg and Parsons or the Employer, each will be subject to a non-competition covenant that covers a period of 18 months (for Mr. Potere) or 12 months (for each of Messrs. Edinburg and Parsons) months after the date of termination and a non-solicitation covenant that covers a period of 18 months (for Mr. Potere) or 12 months (for each of Messrs. Edinburg and Parsons) months after the date of termination.

Base Salary and Annual Bonus

The base salaries and target bonus opportunities of the named executive officers are set forth in the New Sunlight Employment Agreements. The initial base salaries set forth in the New Sunlight Employment Agreements are $300,000 for Mr. Potere, $300,000 for Mr. Edinburg and $290,000 for Mr. Parsons. Base salaries will be reviewed and subject to adjustment, at least annually, by the Compensation Committee.

Each of the named executive officers has a target annual bonus opportunity based on both the Company’s achievement of certain financial performance objectives and the named executive officer’s achievement of certain individual performance objectives. Each named executive officer’s target annual bonus opportunity is stated as a percentage of the named executive officer’s base salary and requires the named executive officer’s continued employment through December 31 of the calendar year during which the annual bonus is earned. The initial target annual bonuses set forth in the New Sunlight Employment Agreements are 60% for Mr. Potere, 50% for Mr. Edinburg and 50% for Mr. Parsons.

Equity Compensation

The named executive officers are eligible to receive annual equity awards from time to time in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Employee and Additional Benefits

The named executive officers are eligible to receive benefits that are substantially similar to those of other executives of the Employer of like status. In addition, Sunlight will reimburse the named executive

130

TABLE OF CONTENTS

officers for certain incremental self-employment taxes associated with their K-1 filing status (for so long as they remain K-1 filers) and their business expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business, in accordance with the Employer’s expenses reimbursement policies and procedures.

Severance Benefits — Termination of Employment for Cause and without Good Reason

Pursuant to the New Sunlight Employment Agreements, upon termination of the named executive officer’s employment by the Employer for Cause (as defined below), or by the named executive officer without Good Reason (as defined below), such named executive officer will receive: (i) any accrued and unpaid base salary through the date of termination; (ii) payment for any previously unreimbursed business expenses; (iii) vested amounts under the New Sunlight Employment Agreement and any other agreement with the Employer, (iv) except in the case of a termination for Cause (as defined below), an annual bonus for any completed fiscal year to the extent then unpaid, and (v) any previously unreimbursed incremental self-employment taxes due under the New Employment Agreement associated with their K-1 filing status (collectively, the “Accrued Rights”).

Severance Benefits — Termination by the Employer without Cause or by the Named Executive Officer for Good Reason Not in Connection with a Change in Control

Under the New Sunlight Employment Agreements, each named executive officer is entitled to the following severance payments in the event of termination of his employment without Cause or upon his resignation for Good Reason outside of the Protection Period (as defined below) (collectively, the “Involuntary Termination Severance Benefits”):

•

Accrued Rights;

•

Multiple of base salary (2 times for Mr. Potere and 1.5 times for each of Messrs. Edinburg and Parsons);

•

Multiple of the target annual bonus (2 times for Mr. Potere and 1.5 times for each of Messrs. Edinburg and Parsons);

•

Full and immediate vesting of all outstanding Class C Units (including any provisionally vested Class C Units) granted prior to the effective date of the New Sunlight Employment Agreement (and any cash, securities or other consideration into which such Class C Units are converted) and a 12-month post-termination exercise period with respect to vested stock options and stock appreciation rights (or, if shorter, the remainder of the full term); and

•

An amount equal to the monthly premium payment to continue the named executive officer’s (and the named executive officer’s family members who were participants in the group health, dental and vision plans immediately prior to the named executive officer’s termination of employment) existing group health, dental coverage and vision for 18 months, calculated under the applicable provisions of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 without regard to whether the named executive officer actually elects such continuation of coverage (the “COBRA Benefits”).

The cash-based portion of the Involuntary Termination Severance Benefits (other than the Accrued Rights) will be paid in equal monthly installments over a 24-month period (for Mr. Potere) or an 18-month period (for each of Messrs. Edinburg and Parsons). As a condition to the receipt of the Involuntary Termination Severance Benefits, each of the named executive officers must timely execute and not revoke a release of claims.

Under the New Sunlight Employment Agreements, “Cause” generally means the named executive officer’s (a) willful and material breach of any material term or provision of the New Sunlight Employment Agreement, (b) indictment or conviction of or plea of nolo contendere to a felony or other crime involving dishonesty or moral turpitude or that would otherwise reasonably be expected to impair or impede the operations of the Employer, (c) gross negligence, violence or threat of violence, fraud, theft or embezzlement (including any violation of federal securities laws) (d) willful breach of any material, written policy of the Employer or the rules of any governmental or regulatory body that, in either case, is (or reasonably could be) materially and demonstrably injurious to the Employer, (e) willful and repeated refusal to follow the lawful directions of the board of directors of the Employer, or (f) any other willful misconduct or breach of

131

TABLE OF CONTENTS

fiduciary duty that is (or reasonably could be) materially injurious to the financial condition, operations or business reputation of the Employer.

Under the New Sunlight Employment Agreements, “Good Reason” generally means, without the named executive officer’s written consent, (a) a material reduction in the named executive officer’s base salary or target annual bonus opportunity, provided however, that prior to a Change in Control (defined below) any diminution in the named executive officer’s base salary shall not be considered a material diminution to the extent the amount of the diminution, when stated as a percentage, is applied uniformly among all similarly situated employees and does not represent more than a 20% diminution of base salary, (b) a material diminution in the nature or scope of the named executive officer’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (c) a diminution in the named executive officer’s title or change in the reporting relationship of the named executive officer, (d) any material breach by the Employer of any provision of the New Sunlight Employment Agreement, and (e) any requirement by the Employer that the named executive officer work primarily from an office or location more than 25 miles from the location stated in the New Sunlight Employment Agreement.

Under the New Sunlight Employment Agreements, “Change in Control” generally means (a) any “person” or “group” (as defined in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), excluding for this purpose, (i) any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Employer, or (ii) any corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of Sunlight in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of Sunlight Common Stock), is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) directly or indirectly of 50% or more of the total voting power represented by Sunlight’s then-outstanding securities; (b) a change in the composition of the Sunlight Board during any 12 consecutive month period the result of which fewer than a majority of the members of the Sunlight Board are Incumbent Directors (as defined below); (c) a reorganization, merger, statutory share exchange, acquisition, consolidation or similar corporate transaction involving Sunlight or any of its affiliates; a sale or other disposition of the assets of Sunlight or an acquisition of assets or stock of another entity by Sunlight or any of its affiliates, in each case, unless, following such transaction, (x) all or substantially all of the individuals and entities that were the beneficial owners of the voting securities of Sunlight outstanding immediately prior thereto continue to own at least 50% of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of Sunlight or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after such transaction, and (y) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the entity resulting from such transaction were Incumbent Directors at the time of the execution of the initial agreement or of the action of the Sunlight Board providing for such transaction; or (d) approval of the stockholders of Sunlight of a liquidation or dissolution of Sunlight.

Under the New Sunlight Employment Agreement “Incumbent Directors” generally means members of the Sunlight Board who are elected, or nominated for election, to the Sunlight Board with the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors as the time of such election or nomination (but does not include an individual whose election or nomination is in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of members of the Sunlight Board).

Under the New Sunlight Employment Agreements, “Protection Period” means the 24-month period immediately following a Change in Control and the 12-month period immediately preceding a Change in Control.

Severance Benefits — Termination by Sunlight without Cause or by the Named Executive Officer for Good Reason in Connection with a Change in Control

Under the New Sunlight Employment Agreements, each named executive officer is entitled to the following severance payments in the event of his termination of employment without Cause or upon his resignation for Good Reason within the Protection Period (collectively, the “Change in Control Severance Benefits”).

•

Accrued Rights;

•

Multiple of base salary (2.5 times for Mr. Potere and 2.0 times for each of Messrs. Edinburg and Parsons);

132

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

Multiple of annual bonus paid with respect to the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year within which the named executive officer was terminated, or if such bonus has not yet been paid as of such termination, the target annual bonus for such preceding calendar year (2.5 times for Mr. Potere and 2.0 times for each of Messrs. Edinburg and Parsons);

•

Full and immediate vesting of all outstanding equity awards, equity-based awards and other long-term incentives (with performance-based awards to vest at the greater of target or actual performance) and a 30-month post-termination exercise period with respect to vested stock options and stock appreciation rights (or, if shorter, the remainder of the full term); and

•

The COBRA Benefits.

The cash-based portion of the Change in Control Severance Benefits (other than the Accrued Rights) will be paid in the form of a lump sum payment for each of Messrs. Potere, Edinburg and Parsons. As a condition to the receipt of the Change in Control Severance Benefits, each of the named executive officers must timely execute and not revoke a release of claims.

Severance Benefits — Termination in Connection with the Named Executive Officer’s Death or Disability

Under the New Sunlight Employment Agreements, the named executive officers are entitled to the following severance payments upon a termination of employment due to his death or Disability (as defined below):

•

Accrued Rights;

•

Pro-rated target annual bonus, payable in a lump sum;

•

Full and immediate vesting of all outstanding Class C Units (including any provisionally vested Class C Units) granted prior to the effective date of the New Sunlight Employment Agreement (and any cash, securities or other consideration into which such Class C Units are converted) and a 30-month post-termination exercise period with respect to vested stock options and stock appreciation rights (or, if shorter, the remainder of the full term); and

•

The COBRA Benefits.

Under the New Sunlight Employment Agreements, “Disability” generally has the meaning ascribed to such term (or substantially similar term) in the disability insurance program that is sponsored by the Employer, or if no such definition exists or the named executive officer is not covered by such a program, then Disability means (a) the named executive officer is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, or (b) the Social Security Administration has determined the named executive officer to be disabled.

Grants of New Equity Awards

Sunlight intends to develop an executive compensation program that is designed to align compensation with its business objectives and the creation of stockholder value, while enabling Sunlight to attract, retain, incentivize and reward individuals who contribute to the long-term success of Sunlight. Decisions on the executive compensation program will be made by the Compensation Committee.

We anticipate making one-time grants of time-based restricted stock units of the Company (collectively, the “2021 Restricted Stock Units”) to Sunlight’s named executive officers in fiscal year 2021. For a complete description of the 2021 Plan, please refer to the complete text of the 2021 Plan, which is filed as an exhibit to this prospectus.

If granted, it is expected that the 2021 Restricted Stock Units will vest over the three-year period following the Closing Date, with one third of the 2021 Restricted Stock Units vesting on the second anniversary of the Closing Date and two thirds of the 2021 Restricted Stock Units vesting on the third anniversary of the Closing Date, in each case, subject to the named executive officer’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date. While the value and terms of the 2021 Restricted Stock Units are subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee, such that they may ultimately change prior to the

133

TABLE OF CONTENTS

grant date and may differ than those set forth below, we anticipate that the aggregate estimated grant date dollar values of the 2021 Restricted Stock Units granted to Sunlight’s named executive officers will be as follows: (i) Matthew Potere: $5,100,000; (ii) Barry Edinburg: $829,000; and (iii) Timothy Parsons: $636,000. We anticipate that the award agreements underlying the 2021 Restricted Stock Units granted to each of Sunlight’s named executive officers will provide that (i) the tranche of the 2021 Restricted Stock Units scheduled to vest on the vesting date immediately following the named executive officer’s (x) termination of employment due to his or her death or “Disability” (as defined in the 2021 Plan), (y) termination of employment by the Company without “Cause” (as defined in the New Sunlight Employment Agreements) or (z) resignation for “Good Reason” (as defined in the New Sunlight Employment Agreements) shall immediately vest on the date of such named executive officer’s termination of employment; and (ii) all outstanding and unvested 2021 Restricted Stock Units shall immediately vest on the date of such named executive officer’s termination of employment by the Company without Cause or resignation for Good Reason that occurs within the 12-month period immediately preceding a “Change in Control” (as defined in the 2021 Plan) or the 24-month period immediately following a Change in Control. For a complete description of the 2021 Restricted Stock Units, please refer to the complete text of the form of Day 1 RSU Agreement, which is filed as an exhibit to this prospectus.

Fiscal Year 2020 Director Compensation

In fiscal year 2020, Sunlight did not directly compensate any of its directors in connection with their service on the prior Sunlight board. Sunlight had a policy of reimbursing all of its non-employee directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending board of directors and committee meetings.

In September 2015, Sunlight entered into a management agreement with Tiger. Under the terms of the agreement, Sunlight paid Tiger a management fee of $50,000 per calendar quarter for strategic financial services provided by Tiger to Sunlight. In May 2018, Sunlight entered into a management agreement with FTV. Under the terms of the agreement, FTV provided strategic financial services to Sunlight in exchange for a management fee of $50,000 per calendar quarter. The agreements were terminated in connection with the closing of the Business Combination. For additional information, see Note 8 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Sunlight LLC.

Following the Business Combination, Sunlight implemented a compensation program for its non-employee directors. Pursuant to this program, non-employee directors will receive the following cash compensation, paid quarterly in arrears:

Position	Annual Retainer
Board service		$	50,000
plus (as applicable):
Audit Committee Chair		$	20,000
Compensation Committee Chair		$	15,000
Nominating & Corporate Governance/ESG Committee Chair		$	10,000
Audit Committee Member		$	10,000
Compensation Committee Member		$	7,500
Nominating & Corporate Governance/ESG Committee Member		$	5,000

Sunlight expects to reimburse non-employee directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending board of directors and committee meetings.

134

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

The following summary of the material terms of our capital stock is not intended to be a complete summary of the rights and preferences of such securities. We urge you to read our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (“Second A&R Charter”) in its entirety for a complete description of the rights and preferences of our capital stock and the warrant agreement dated November 24, 2020 (the “warrant agreement”) and form of warrant for a description of the terms of the public and private placement warrants.

Authorized and Outstanding Stock

The Second A&R Charter provides for authorized shares of all classes of capital stock in the aggregate amount of 500,000,000 shares, consisting of 465,000,000 shares of common stock, including 420,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, 20,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, and 65,000,000 shares of Class C Common Stock, and 35,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock; the Second A&R Charter specifies the rights of the Class C Common Stock in order to provide for our “Up-C” structure. As of September 2, 2021, there were 84,837,655 (excludes 1,535,941 of shares held by Sunlight in respect of net withholding for tax payments) shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding, 0 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding and 47,595,455 shares of Class C Common Stock outstanding.

Voting Power

Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Second A&R Charter or required by applicable law, each holder of Common Stock has the right to one vote per share of Common Stock held of record by such holder; provided, however, that, except as otherwise required by law, holders of Common Stock are not entitled to vote on any amendment to the Second A&R Charter (including any certificate of designation relating to any series of Preferred Stock) that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either separately or together as a class with the holders of one or more other such series, to vote thereon pursuant to the Second A&R Charter (including any certificate of designation relating to any series of Preferred Stock).

Dividends

Subject to applicable law and the rights, if any, of the holders of one or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock, holders of shares of Class A Common Stock are entitled to receive such dividends and distributions in cash, stock or otherwise as may be declared thereon by the Sunlight Board in its discretion from time to time out of funds of Sunlight legally available therefor and shall share equally on a per share basis in all such dividends or other distributions.

No Preemptive or Similar Rights

Our Common Stock is not entitled to preemptive rights and is not subject to conversion, redemption or sinking fund provisions.

Liquidation, Dissolution and Winding Up

Subject to the rights, if any, of the holders of one or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock and after payment or provision for payment of the debt and other liabilities of Sunlight, holders of shares of Class A Common Stock are entitled to receive (ratably in proportion to the number of shares held by them) the assets and funds of Sunlight available for distribution in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of Sunlight, whether voluntary or involuntary. A liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of Sunlight, as such terms are used in Subparagraph C(d) of the Second A&R Charter, shall not be deemed to be occasioned by or to include any consolidation or merger of Sunlight with or into any other person or a sale, lease, exchange, conveyance or other disposition of all or any part of its assets.

Class B Common Stock

The Second A&R Charter authorizes 20,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share. Under the Second A&R Charter, each share of Class B Common Stock automatically converted into shares of Class A Common Stock on a one-to-one basis upon the consummation of the Business Combination.

135

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Class C Common Stock

Shares of Class C Common Stock shall be redeemable for shares of Class A Common Stock on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement. Sunlight will at all times reserve and keep available out of its authorized but unissued shares of Class A Common Stock, solely for the purpose of issuance upon redemption of the outstanding shares of Class C Common Stock for Class A Common Stock pursuant to the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement, such number of shares of Class A Common Stock that shall be issuable upon any such redemption pursuant to the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement; provided, however, that nothing contained herein shall be construed to preclude Sunlight from satisfying its obligations in respect of any such redemption of shares of Class C Common Stock pursuant to the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement by delivering to the holder of shares of Class C Common Stock upon such redemption, cash in lieu of shares of Class A Common Stock in the amount permitted by and provided in the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement or shares of Class A Common Stock which are held in the treasury of Sunlight. All shares of Class A Common Stock that shall be issued upon any such redemption will, upon issuance in accordance with the Sunlight A&R LLC Agreement, be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. All shares of Class C Common Stock redeemed shall be cancelled.

Preferred Stock

The Second A&R Charter provides that shares of Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more classes or series. The Sunlight Board is authorized to fix the designation, voting powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other rights (and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof) of the shares of each such series and to increase (but not above the total number of authorized shares of the class) or decrease (but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding) the number of shares of any such series.

The number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock may also be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all the then-outstanding shares of capital stock of Sunlight entitled to vote generally, voting together as a single class, without a separate vote of the holders of the Preferred Stock or any classes or series thereof, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to the terms of any certificate of designation designating a series of Preferred Stock.

The Sunlight Board is able to, without stockholder approval, issue Preferred Stock with voting and other rights that could adversely affect the voting power and other rights of the holders of the Common Stock and could have anti-takeover effects. The ability of the Sunlight Board to issue Preferred Stock without stockholder approval could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of Sunlight or the removal of Sunlight’s management. Sunlight had no Preferred Stock outstanding at the date the Second A&R Charter became effective.

Registration Rights

Certain holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to registration rights as described under “Registration Rights” below.

Warrants

Public Stockholders’ Warrants

Each whole warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one whole share of our Class A Common Stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment as discussed below, at any time commencing on the later of 12 months from the closing of the IPO or 30 days after the completion of the Business Combination, provided in each case that we have an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and a current prospectus relating to them is available (or we permit holders to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis under the circumstances specified in the warrant agreement) and such shares are registered, qualified or exempt from registration under the securities, or blue sky, laws of the state of residence of the holder. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, a warrantholder may exercise its warrants only for a whole number of shares of

136

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Class A Common Stock. This means that only a whole warrant may be exercised at any given time by a warrantholder. No fractional warrants will be issued upon separation of the units and only whole warrants can be traded. Accordingly, unless you have purchased at least two units, you will not be able to receive or trade a whole warrant. The warrants will expire five years after the completion of the Business Combination, at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, or earlier upon redemption or liquidation, as applicable.

We will not be obligated to deliver any shares of Class A Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of a warrant and will have no obligation to settle such warrant exercise unless a registration statement under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of Class A Common Stock underlying the warrants is then effective and a prospectus relating thereto is current, subject to our satisfying our obligations described below with respect to registration. No warrant will be exercisable and we will not be obligated to issue shares of Class A Common Stock upon exercise of a warrant unless the Class A Common Stock issuable upon such warrant exercise has been registered, qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of the registered holder of the warrants. In the event that the conditions in the two immediately preceding sentences are not satisfied with respect to a warrant, the holder of such warrant will not be entitled to exercise such warrant and such warrant may have no value and expire worthless. In no event will we be required to net cash settle any warrant. In the event that a registration statement is not effective for the exercised warrants, the purchaser of a unit containing such warrant will have paid the full purchase price for the unit solely for the share of Class A Common Stock underlying such unit.

We have agreed that as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 15 business days, after the closing of the Business Combination, we will use our best efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement for the registration, under the Securities Act, of the shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants. We will use our best efforts to cause the same to become effective and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement, and a current prospectus relating thereto, until the expiration of the warrants in accordance with the provisions of the warrant agreement. Notwithstanding the above, if our Class A Common Stock is at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that it satisfies the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option, require holders of public warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement, but we will be required to use our best efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available. In such event, each holder would pay the exercise price by surrendering the warrants for that number of shares of Class A Common Stock equal to the lesser of (A) the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of (i) the number of shares of our Class A Common Stock underlying the warrants, and (ii) the excess of the “fair market value” (defined below) over the exercise price of the warrants by (y) such fair market value and (B) the product of the number of warrants surrendered and 0.361. The “fair market value” as used in this paragraph shall mean the average reported last sale price of our Class A Common Stock for the 10 trading days ending on the trading day prior to the date on which the notice of exercise is received by the warrant agent.

Redemption of warrants when the price per share of Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $18.00

Once the warrants become exercisable, we may redeem the outstanding warrants:

•

in whole and not in part;

•

at a price of $0.01 per warrant;

•

upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption, or the 30 day redemption period, to each warrantholder; and

•

if, and only if, the reported last sale price of the Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which we send the notice of redemption to the warrantholders.

We will not redeem the warrants as described above unless a registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is effective and a

137

TABLE OF CONTENTS

current prospectus relating to those shares of Class A Common Stock is available throughout the 30-day redemption period. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws.

We have established the last of the redemption criterion discussed above to prevent a redemption call unless there is at the time of the call a significant premium to the warrant exercise price. If the foregoing conditions are satisfied and we issue a notice of redemption of the warrants, each warrantholder will be entitled to exercise its warrant prior to the scheduled redemption date. However, the price of the Class A Common Stock may fall below the $18.00 redemption trigger price (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) as well as the $11.50 (for whole shares) warrant exercise price after the redemption notice is issued.

Redemption of warrants when the price per share of Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $10.00

Once the warrants become exercisable, we may redeem the outstanding warrants:

•

in whole and not in part;

•

at a price of $0.10 per warrant, provided that holders will be able to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis prior to redemption and receive that number of shares of Class A Common Stock determined by reference to the table below, based on the redemption date and the “fair market value” of our Class A Common Stock except as otherwise described below;

•

upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice to each warrantholder;

•

if, and only if, the reported last sale price of our Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $10.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) on the trading day prior to the date on which we send the notice of redemption to the warrantholders; and

•

if the reported last sale price of our Class A Common Stock on the trading day prior to the date on which we send the notice of redemption to the warrantholders is less than $18.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like), the private placement warrants must also be concurrently called for redemption on the same terms as the outstanding public warrants, as described above.

Beginning on the date the notice of redemption is given until the warrants are redeemed or exercised, holders may elect to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis. The numbers in the table below represent the number of shares of Class A Common Stock that a warrantholder will receive upon a cashless exercise in connection with a redemption by us pursuant to this redemption feature, based on the “fair market value” of our Class A Common Stock on the corresponding redemption date (assuming holders elect to exercise their warrants and such warrants are not redeemed for $0.10 per warrant), and the number of months that the corresponding redemption date precedes the expiration date of the warrants, each as set forth in the table below.

138

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Redemption Date (period to expiration of warrants)	Fair Market Value of Class A Common Stock
Redemption Date (period to expiration of warrants)	≤$10.00		$11.00		$12.00		$13.00		$14.00		$15.00		$16.00		$17.00		≥$18.00
60 months		0.261		0.281		0.297		0.311		0.324		0.337		0.348		0.358		0.361
57 months		0.257		0.277		0.294		0.310		0.324		0.337		0.348		0.358		0.361
54 months		0.252		0.272		0.291		0.307		0.322		0.335		0.347		0.357		0.361
51 months		0.246		0.268		0.287		0.304		0.320		0.333		0.346		0.357		0.361
48 months		0.241		0.263		0.283		0.301		0.317		0.332		0.344		0.356		0.361
45 months		0.235		0.258		0.279		0.298		0.315		0.330		0.343		0.356		0.361
42 months		0.228		0.252		0.274		0.294		0.312		0.328		0.342		0.355		0.361
39 months		0.221		0.246		0.269		0.290		0.309		0.325		0.340		0.354		0.361
36 months		0.213		0.239		0.263		0.285		0.305		0.323		0.339		0.353		0.361
33 months		0.205		0.232		0.257		0.280		0.301		0.320		0.337		0.352		0.361
30 months		0.196		0.224		0.250		0.274		0.297		0.316		0.335		0.351		0.361
27 months		0.185		0.214		0.242		0.268		0.291		0.313		0.332		0.350		0.361
24 months		0.173		0.204		0.233		0.260		0.285		0.308		0.329		0.348		0.361
21 months		0.161		0.193		0.223		0.252		0.279		0.304		0.326		0.347		0.361
18 months		0.146		0.179		0.211		0.242		0.271		0.298		0.322		0.345		0.361
15 months		0.130		0.164		0.197		0.230		0.262		0.291		0.317		0.342		0.361
12 months		0.111		0.146		0.181		0.216		0.250		0.282		0.312		0.339		0.361
9 months		0.090		0.125		0.162		0.199		0.237		0.272		0.305		0.336		0.361
6 months		0.065		0.099		0.137		0.178		0.219		0.259		0.296		0.331		0.361
3 months		0.034		0.065		0.104		0.150		0.197		0.243		0.286		0.326		0.361
0 months		—		—		0.042		0.115		0.179		0.233		0.281		0.323		0.361

The “fair market value” of our Class A Common Stock shall mean the average reported last sale price of our Class A Common Stock for the 10 trading days immediately following the date on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of warrants. We will provide our warrantholders with the final fair market value no later than one business day after the ten-trading day period described above ends.

The exact fair market value and redemption date may not be set forth in the table above, in which case, if the fair market value is between two values in the table or the redemption date is between two redemption dates in the table, the number of shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued for each warrant exercised will be determined by a straight-line interpolation between the number of shares set forth for the higher and lower fair market values and the earlier and later redemption dates, as applicable, based on a 365 or 366-day year, as applicable. For example, if the average reported last sale price of our Class A Common Stock for the 10 trading days immediately following the date on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of the warrants is $11.00 per share, and at such time there are 57 months until the expiration of the warrants, holders may choose to, in connection with this redemption feature, exercise their warrants for 0.277 shares of Class A Common Stock for each whole warrant. For an example where the exact fair market value and redemption date are not as set forth in the table above, if the average reported last sale price of our Class A Common Stock for the 10 trading days immediately following the date on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of the warrants is $13.50 per share, and at such time there are 38 months until the expiration of the warrants, holders may choose to, in connection with this redemption feature, exercise their warrants for 0.298 shares of Class A Common Stock for each whole warrant. In no event will the warrants be exercisable on a cashless basis in connection with this redemption feature for more than 0.361 shares of Class A Common Stock per whole warrant (subject to adjustment). Finally, as reflected in the table above, if the warrants are “out of the money” (i.e. the trading price of our Class A Common Stock is below the exercise price of the warrants) and about to expire, they cannot be exercised on a cashless basis in connection with a redemption by us pursuant to this redemption feature, since they will not be exercisable for any shares of Class A Common Stock.

139

TABLE OF CONTENTS

This redemption feature differs from the typical warrant redemption features used in some other blank check offerings, which typically only provide for a redemption of warrants for cash (other than the private placement warrants) when the trading price for the Class A Common Stock exceeds $18.00 per share for a specified period of time. This redemption feature is structured to allow for all of the outstanding warrants to be redeemed when the Class A Common Stock is trading at or above $10.00 per share, which may be at a time when the trading price of our Class A Common Stock is below the exercise price of the warrants. We have established this redemption feature to provide us with the flexibility to redeem the warrants without the warrants having to reach the $18.00 per share threshold. Holders choosing to exercise their warrants in connection with a redemption pursuant to this feature will, in effect, receive a number of shares for their warrants, based on the “redemption price” as determined pursuant to the above table. We have calculated the “redemption prices” as set forth in the table above to reflect a Black-Scholes option pricing model with a fixed volatility input as of the date of the IPO prospectus. This redemption right provides us with an additional mechanism by which to redeem all of the outstanding warrants and therefore have certainty as to our capital structure as the warrants would no longer be outstanding and would have been exercised or redeemed, and we will effectively be required to pay the redemption price to warrantholders if we choose to exercise this redemption right, it will allow us to quickly proceed with a redemption of the warrants if we determine it is in our best interest to do so. As such, we would redeem the warrants in this manner when we believe it is in our best interest to update our capital structure to remove the warrants and pay the redemption price to the warrantholders.

As stated above, we can redeem the warrants when the Class A Common Stock is trading at a price starting at $10.00, which is below the exercise price of $11.50, because it will provide certainty with respect to our capital structure and cash position while providing warrantholders with the opportunity to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis for the applicable number of shares of Class A Common Stock. If we choose to redeem the warrants when the Class A Common Stock is trading at a price below the exercise price of the warrants, this could result in the warrantholders receiving fewer shares of Class A Common Stock than they would have received if they had chosen to wait to exercise their warrants for shares of Class A Common Stock if and when such shares of Class A Common Stock were trading at a price higher than the exercise price of $11.50.

No fractional shares of Class A Common Stock will be issued upon exercise. If, upon exercise, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will round down to the nearest whole number of the number of shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued to the holder.

Redemption Procedures

A holder of a warrant may notify us in writing in the event it elects to be subject to a requirement that such holder will not have the right to exercise such warrant, to the extent that after giving effect to such exercise, such person (together with such person’s affiliates), to the warrant agent’s actual knowledge, would beneficially own in excess of 9.8% (or such other amount as a holder may specify) of the shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise.

Anti-Dilution Adjustments

The stock prices set forth in the column headings of the table above shall be adjusted as of any date on which the number of shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant is adjusted pursuant to the following two paragraphs. The adjusted stock prices in the column headings shall equal the stock prices immediately prior to such adjustment, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of shares deliverable upon exercise of a warrant immediately prior to such adjustment and the denominator of which is the number of shares deliverable upon exercise of a warrant as so adjusted. The number of shares in the table above shall be adjusted in the same manner and at the same time as the number of shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant.

If the number of outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock is increased by a stock dividend payable in shares of Class A Common Stock, or by a split-up of shares of Class A Common Stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such stock dividend, split-up or similar event, the number of shares of Class A Common Stock issuable on exercise of each warrant will be increased in proportion to such increase in the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock. A rights offering to holders of Class A

140

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Common Stock entitling holders to purchase shares of Class A Common Stock at a price less than the fair market value will be deemed a stock dividend of a number of shares of Class A Common Stock equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of Class A Common Stock actually sold in such rights offering (or issuable under any other equity securities sold in such rights offering that are convertible into or exercisable for Class A Common Stock) multiplied by (ii) one (1) minus the quotient of (x) the price per share of Class A Common Stock paid in such rights offering divided by (y) the fair market value. For these purposes (i) if the rights offering is for securities convertible into or exercisable for Class A Common Stock, in determining the price payable for Class A Common Stock, there will be taken into account any consideration received for such rights, as well as any additional amount payable upon exercise or conversion and (ii) fair market value means the average last reported sale price of Class A Common Stock as reported for the ten (10) trading day period ending on the trading day prior to the first date on which the shares of Class A Common Stock trade on the applicable exchange or in the applicable market, regular way, without the right to receive such rights.

If the number of outstanding shares of our Class A Common Stock is decreased by a consolidation, combination, reverse stock split or reclassification of shares of Class A Common Stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such consolidation, combination, reverse stock split, reclassification or similar event, the number of shares of Class A Common Stock issuable on exercise of each warrant will be decreased in proportion to such decrease in outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock.

Whenever the number of shares of Class A Common Stock purchasable upon the exercise of the warrants is adjusted, as described above, the warrant exercise price will be adjusted by multiplying the warrant exercise price immediately prior to such adjustment by a fraction (x) the numerator of which will be the number of shares of Class A Common Stock purchasable upon the exercise of the warrants immediately prior to such adjustment, and (y) the denominator of which will be the number of shares of Class A Common Stock so purchasable immediately thereafter.

In case of any reclassification or reorganization of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock (other than those described above or that solely affects the par value of such shares of Class A Common Stock), or in the case of any merger or consolidation of us with or into another corporation (other than a consolidation or merger in which we are the continuing corporation and that does not result in any reclassification or reorganization of our outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock), or in the case of any sale or conveyance to another corporation or entity of the assets or other property of us as an entirety or substantially as an entirety in connection with which we are dissolved, the holders of the warrants will thereafter have the right to purchase and receive, upon the basis and upon the terms and conditions specified in the warrants and in lieu of the shares of our Class A Common Stock immediately theretofore purchasable and receivable upon the exercise of the rights represented thereby, the kind and amount of shares of stock or other securities or property (including cash) receivable upon such reclassification, reorganization, merger or consolidation, or upon a dissolution following any such sale or transfer, that the holder of the warrants would have received if such holder had exercised his, her or its warrants immediately prior to such event. If less than 70% of the consideration receivable by the holders of Class A Common Stock in such a transaction is payable in the form of Class A Common Stock in the successor entity that is listed for trading on a national securities exchange or is quoted in an established over-the-counter market, or is to be so listed for trading or quoted immediately following such event, and if the registered holder of the warrant properly exercises the warrant within thirty days following public disclosure of such transaction, the warrant exercise price will be reduced as specified in the warrant agreement based on the Black-Scholes value (as defined in the warrant agreement) of the warrant. The purpose of such exercise price reduction is to provide additional value to holders of the warrants when an extraordinary transaction occurs during the exercise period of the warrants pursuant to which the holders of the warrants otherwise do not receive the full potential value of the warrants.

The warrants have been issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of public warrants.

141

TABLE OF CONTENTS

You should review a copy of the warrant agreement, which is filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement of which this prospectus is a part, for a complete description of the terms and conditions applicable to the warrants.

The warrants may be exercised upon surrender of the warrant certificate on or prior to the expiration date at the offices of the warrant agent, with the exercise form on the reverse side of the warrant certificate completed and executed as indicated, accompanied by full payment of the exercise price (or on a cashless basis, if applicable), by certified or official bank check payable to us, for the number of warrants being exercised. The warrantholders do not have the rights or privileges of holders of Class A Common Stock or any voting rights until they exercise their warrants and receive shares of Class A Common Stock. After the issuance of shares of Class A Common Stock upon exercise of the warrants, each holder will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters to be voted on by stockholders.

No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the warrants. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will, upon exercise, round down to the nearest whole number of shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued to the warrantholder.

Private Placement Warrants

The private placement warrants (including the shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the private placement warrants) are not transferable, assignable or salable until 30 days after the completion of the Business Combination (except, among other limited exceptions, to our officers and directors and other persons or entities affiliated with the Sponsor), and they will not be redeemable by us (except as described above under “— Redemption of warrants when the price per share of Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $10.00”) so long as they are held by the Sponsor or its permitted transferees. The Sponsor, or its permitted transferees, has the option to exercise the private placement warrants for cash or on a cashless basis. Except as described below, the private placement warrants have terms and provisions that are identical to those of the warrants sold in connection with the IPO, including as to exercise price, exercisability and exercise period. If the private placement warrants are held by holders other than the Sponsor or its permitted transferees, the private placement warrants will be redeemable by us in all redemption scenarios and exercisable by the holders on the same basis as the warrants sold in connection with the IPO.

If holders of the private placement warrants elect to exercise them on a cashless basis, they would pay the exercise price by surrendering his, her or its warrants in exchange for that number of shares of Class A Common Stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of (A) the number of shares of Class A Common Stock underlying the warrants and (B) the excess of the “fair market value” (defined below) over the exercise price of the warrants by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” shall mean the average reported last sale price of the Class A Common Stock for the ten (10) trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the notice of warrant exercise is sent to the warrant agent.

Our Transfer Agent and Warrant Agent

The Transfer Agent for our Class A Common Stock and warrant agent for our warrants is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company. We have agreed to indemnify Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company in its roles as Transfer Agent and warrant agent, its agents and each of its stockholders, directors, officers and employees against all claims and losses that may arise out of acts performed or omitted for its activities in that capacity, except for any liability due to any gross negligence, willful misconduct or bad faith of the indemnified person or entity.

Certain Anti-Takeover Provisions of Delaware Law and our Second A&R Charter and Bylaws

We have not opted out of Section 203 of the DGCL under the Second A&R Charter. Under Section 203 of the DGCL, Sunlight will be prohibited from engaging in any business combination with any stockholder for a period of three years following the time that such stockholder (the “interested stockholder”) came to own at least 15% of the outstanding voting stock of Sunlight (the “acquisition”), except if:

•

the Sunlight Board approved the acquisition prior to its consummation;

142

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the outstanding voting stock upon consummation of the acquisition; or

•

the business combination is approved by the Sunlight Board, and by a 2/3 majority vote of the other stockholders in a meeting.

Generally, a “business combination” includes any merger, consolidation, asset or stock sale or certain other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to certain exceptions, an “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with that person’s affiliates and associates, owns, or within the previous three years owned, 15% or more of our voting stock.

Under certain circumstances, declining to opt out of Section 203 of the DGCL will make it more difficult for a person who would be an “interested stockholder” to effect various business combinations with Sunlight for a three-year period. This may encourage companies interested in acquiring Sunlight to negotiate in advance with the Sunlight Board because the stockholder approval requirement would be avoided if the Sunlight Board approves the acquisition which results in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder. This may also have the effect of preventing changes in the Sunlight Board and may make it more difficult to accomplish transactions which stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.

Our Second A&R Charter and bylaws include a number of provisions that may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying or preventing changes in control of our management team, including the following:

•

Board of Directors Vacancies. Our Second A&R Charter and bylaws authorize the Sunlight Board to fill vacant directorships, including newly-created seats. In addition, the number of directors constituting the Sunlight Board will be set only by resolution adopted by a majority vote of directors then in office. These provisions will prevent a stockholder from increasing the size of the Sunlight Board and gaining control of the Sunlight Board by filling the resulting vacancies with its own nominees.

•

Classified Board. Our Second A&R Charter and bylaws provide that the Sunlight Board is classified into three classes of directors, each of which will hold office for a three-year term. In addition, directors may only be removed from the Sunlight Board for cause and only by the approval of a majority of our then-outstanding shares of our Common Stock. A third party may be discouraged from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us as it is more difficult and time consuming for stockholders to replace a majority of the directors on a classified board of directors.

•

Stockholder Action; Special Meeting of Stockholders. Our Second A&R Charter provides that stockholders will not be able to take action by written consent, and will only be able to take action at annual or special meetings of our stockholders. Stockholders will not be permitted to cumulate their votes for the election of directors. Our bylaws further provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by a majority vote of the entire Sunlight Board, the chairman of the Sunlight Board or our president.

•

Advance Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations. Our bylaws provide advance notice procedures for stockholders seeking to bring business before our annual meeting of stockholders, or to nominate candidates for election as directors at any meeting of stockholders. Our bylaws also specify certain requirements regarding the form and content of a stockholder’s notice. These provisions may preclude our stockholders from bringing matters before our annual meeting of stockholders or from making nominations for directors at our meetings of stockholders.

•

Issuance of Undesignated Preferred Stock. The Sunlight Board has the authority, without further action by the holders of Common Stock, to issue up to 35,000,000 shares of undesignated Preferred Stock with rights and preferences, including voting rights, designated from time to time by the Sunlight Board. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock will enable the Sunlight Board to render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise.

143

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exclusive Forum

Unless Sunlight consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Unless Sunlight consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the sole and exclusive forum to bring: (a) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of Sunlight; (b) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by a director, officer or other employee of Sunlight or Sunlight’s stockholders; (c) any action or proceeding asserting a claim against Sunlight or any director, officer or other employee of Sunlight arising out of or pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, the Second A&R Charter or the bylaws of Sunlight (as each may be amended from time to time); (d) any action asserting a claim against Sunlight or any director or officer or other employee of Sunlight governed by the internal affairs doctrine, except for, as to each of (a) through (d) above, (i) any action as to which the Court of Chancery determines that there is an indispensable party not subject to the personal jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery (and the indispensable party does not consent to the personal jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery within ten (10) days following such determination), which is vested in the exclusive jurisdiction of a court or forum other than the Court of Chancery, or for which the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction.

Rule 144

Restrictions on the Use of Rule 144 by Shell Companies or Former Shell Companies

Rule 144 is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by shell companies (other than business combination related shell companies) or issuers that have been at any time previously a shell company. However, Rule 144 also includes an important exception to this prohibition if the following conditions are met:

•

the issuer of the securities that was formerly a shell company has ceased to be a shell company;

•

the issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;

•

the issuer of the securities has filed all Exchange Act reports and materials required to be filed, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Current Reports on Form 8-K; and

•

at least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current Form 10 type information with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company.

As a result, our initial stockholders will be able to sell their Founder Shares and private placement warrants, as applicable, pursuant to Rule 144 without registration one year after we have completed the Business Combination, although these shares may be sold sooner to the extent they have been registered on a registration statement that has been declared effective by the SEC.

Registration Rights

Certain Stockholders’ Registration Rights

In connection with the Closing, Sunlight, the Sponsor, Tiger, FTV Blocker Holder and certain holders party thereto (collectively, the “IRA Holders”), entered into the Investor Rights Agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, (a) that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 24, 2020, was terminated and (b) certain resale registration rights were granted with respect to (i) the private placement warrants (including any shares of Common Stock issued or issuable upon the exercise of any such private placement warrants), (ii) any outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock held by an IRA Holder at any time, whether held on the date of the Investor Rights Agreement or acquired after the date of the Investor Rights Agreement, (iii) any equity securities (including the shares of Common Stock issued or issuable upon the exercise of any such equity security) of Sunlight issuable upon conversion of any working capital

144

TABLE OF CONTENTS

loans in an amount up to $1,500,000 made to Sunlight by an IRA Holder, (iv) any shares of Class A Common Stock issued or issuable upon exchange of Sunlight Class EX Units and Class C Common Stock issued to a Holder under the Business Combination Agreement and (v) any other equity security of Sunlight issued or issuable with respect to any such shares of Common Stock by way of a stock dividend or stock split or in connection with a combination of shares, recapitalization, merger, consolidation or reorganization.

Furthermore, pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, we are filing this prospectus (at our sole cost and expense) registering the resale of certain securities held by or issuable to the IRA Holders, and will use our reasonable best efforts to have such prospectus declared effective as soon as reasonably practicable after the filing thereof. In certain circumstances, Tiger and FTV Blocker Holder can demand up to three underwritten offerings in the aggregate and the Sponsor can demand up to one underwritten offering. Each IRA Holder will be entitled to customary piggyback registration rights.

PIPE Shares

Pursuant to the Subscription Agreements, we are filing with the SEC this prospectus registering the resale of 25,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock at a purchase price of $10.00 per share, and will have it declared effective as soon as practicable after the filing thereof.

Public Warrants

Under the terms of the warrant agreement relating to the public warrants, we have filed the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, and we are obligated to use our best efforts to cause it to become effective and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement, and a current prospectus relating thereto, until the expiration of the public warrants.

Lock-Up Agreements

Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, at the Closing:

•

pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, Tiger and FTV Blocker Holder agreed to the same lock-up restrictions applicable to the Sponsor and the board of directors and management team of Sunlight;

•

subject to certain exceptions, all Sunlight employees and former employees who, as of immediately after the Closing, held 100,000 shares or more of Class A Common Stock or Class EX Units and a corresponding number of shares of Class C Common Stock, agreed that: (x) 20% of the Class A Common Stock or Class EX Units and a corresponding number of shares of Class C Common Stock (as applicable, “Restricted Stock”) held by it, him or her will be subject to lock-up transfer restrictions until the one-year anniversary of the Closing, with the potential for Early Release (as defined below) after six months following the Closing and (y) 80% of the Restricted Stock held by it, him or her will be subject to lock-up transfer restrictions until the 15-month anniversary of the Closing, with the potential for Early Release after nine months following the Closing;

•

certain executives of Sunlight agreed that: (a) 20% of the Restricted Stock held by it, him or her will be subject to lock-up transfer restrictions until the 16-month anniversary of the Closing, with the potential for Early Release after nine months following the Closing and (b) 80% of the Restricted Stock held by it, him or her will be subject to lock-up transfer restrictions until the 20-month anniversary of the Closing, with potential for Early Release after 14 months following the Closing; and

•

all other persons who held equity or equity-based awards in respect of less than 100,000 shares of Restricted Stock as of immediately prior to at the Closing, agreed that 100% of the Restricted Stock held by it, him or her will be subject to lock-up transfer restrictions until the six-month anniversary of the Closing; provided, that with respect to any such person that is not a Sunlight employee, Sunlight will request and use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain such agreement from such person;

where applicable, subject to exceptions included in such lock-up agreements, including for “net settlement” of distributions of Class A Common Stock to holders of certain company awards as contemplated by Section 2.02(e) of the Business Combination Agreement in respect of applicable tax withholding obligations.

145

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

The following table sets forth information known to Sunlight regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock as of immediately following the Closing, by:

•

each person who is known by Sunlight to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock;

•

each named executive officer and director of Sunlight; and

•

all current executive officers and directors of Sunlight, as a group.

Beneficial ownership for the purposes of the following table is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. A person is a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security, or “investment power”, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of the security or has the right to acquire such powers within 60 days.

The beneficial ownership percentages set forth in the table below are based on 132,433,111 (excludes 1,535,941 shares of Class A Commons Stock held by Sunlight in respect of net withholding for tax payments) shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding as of immediately following the Closing.

Unless otherwise noted in the footnotes to the following table, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to beneficially owned Common Stock.

Name of Beneficial Owners(1)	Number of shares of Common Stock		%
Five Percent Stockholders
Spartan Acquisition Sponsor II LLC(2)		7,337,241		5.5%
FTV V, L.P.(3)		25,271,539		19.1%
Tiger Infrastructure Partners Sunlight Feeder LP(4)		21,179,370		16.0%
Tiger Infrastructure Partners Co-Invest B LP(5)		8,437,552		6.4%
Named Executive Officers and Directors
Matthew Potere		3,510,541		2.7%
Barry Edinburg		2,341,446		1.8%
Timothy Parsons		1,386,399		1.0%
Brad Bernstein		—		0.0%
Jeanette Gorgas		—		0.0%
Emil W. Henry, Jr.(6)		29,616,922		22.4%
Toan Huynh		—		0.0%
Jennifer D. Nordquist		—		0.0%
Philip Ryan		—		0.0%
Kenneth Shea		—		0.0%
Joshua Siegel		—		0.0%
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (13 Individuals)		18,056,530		13.6%

(1)

This table is based on a total of 132,433,111 (excludes 1,535,941 of shares held by Sunlight in respect of net withholding for tax payments) shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately after the Closing on July 9, 2021, consisting of 84,837,655 (excludes 1,535,941 of shares held by Sunlight in respect of net withholding for tax payments) shares of Class A Common Stock and 47,595,455 shares of Class C Common Stock. Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of the directors and executive officers in this table is 101 N. Tryon Street, Suite 1000, Charlotte, NC 28246.

147

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(2)

Information based on the Form 4 filed jointly with the SEC on July 13, 2021 by Spartan Acquisition Sponsor II LLC (the “Sponsor”); AP Spartan Energy Holdings II, L.P. (“AP Spartan”); Apollo ANRP Advisors III, L.P. (“ANRP Advisors”); Apollo ANRP Capital Management III, LLC (“ANRP Capital Management”); APH Holdings, L.P. (“APH Holdings”); and Apollo Principal Holdings III GP, Ltd. (“Principal Holdings III GP”).

Includes 7,337,241 shares of Class A Common Stock directly held by the Sponsor. The Sponsor is managed by affiliates of Apollo Global Management, Inc. AP Spartan is the sole member of the Sponsor. ANRP Advisors is the general partner of AP Spartan. ANRP Capital Management is the general partner of ANRP Advisors. APH Holdings is the sole member of ANRP Capital Management. Principal Holdings III GP is the general partner of APH Holdings. Scott Kleinman, James Zelter, Joshua Harris and Marc Rowan are the directors of Principal Holdings III GP, and as such may be deemed to have voting and dispositive control of the shares of Class A Common Stock held of record by the Sponsor. Each of the Sponsor, AP Spartan, ANRP Advisors, ANRP Capital Management, APH Holdings, Principal Holdings III GP and each of Messrs. Kleinman, Zelter, Harris and Rowan, disclaims beneficial ownership of the Class A Common Stock, in each case except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein, and this discslosure shall not be deemed an admission that any such entity or person is the beneficial owner of or has any pecuniary interest in, such securities for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or for any other purpose. The addresses of each of the Sponsor, AP Spartan and Messrs. Kleinman, Zelter, Harris and Rowan is 9 West 57th Street, 43rd Floor, New York, New York 10019. The address of each of ANRP Advisors and Principal Holdings III GP is c/o Walkers Corporate Limited; Cayman Corporate Centre; 27 Hospital Road; George Town; Grand Cayman KY1-9008. The address of each of ANRP Capital Management and APH Holdings is One Manhattanville Road, Suite 201, Purchase, New York, 10577.

(3)

Information based on the Schedule 13D filed jointly with the SEC on July 19, 2021 by FTV V, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“FTV LP”); and FTV Management V, L.L.C, a Delaware limited liability company (“FTV LLC”), in its capacity as general partner of FTV LP.

Includes 25,271,539 shares of Class A Common Stock directly held by FTV LP. Any action by FTV LLC with respect to the reported securities, including voting and dispositive decisions, requires at least a majority vote of the managing members. Because voting and dispositive decisions are made by at least a majority of the managing members, none of the managers is deemed to be a beneficial owner of the reported securities. By virtue of their relationship each of FTV LP and FTV LLC may be deemed to share the power to vote or direct the vote and to share the power to dispose of or direct the disposition of the reported securities.

(4)

Information based on the Schedule 13D filed jointly with the SEC on July 19, 2021 by Tiger Infrastructure Partners LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “US Advisor”); Tiger Infrastructure Partners Sunlight Feeder LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Sunlight Feeder”); Tiger Infrastructure Partners AIV I LP, a Delaware limited Partnership (“Fund I AIV”); Tiger Infrastructure Partners Co-Invest B LP, a Delaware limited Partnership (“Co-Invest B”); and Emil W. Henry, Jr. (“Mr. Henry”). The US Advisor is the investment manager of Fund I AIV and Co-Invest B. Sunlight Feeder is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fund I AIV. The US Advisor is managed by its general partner Emil Henry III LLC (“EH III”); EH III is managed by its sole managing member, Henry Tiger Holdings LLC (“HTH”); HTH is managed by its sole managing member, Emil Henry LLC (“EH LLC”). Emil W. Henry, Jr. is the sole managing member of EH LLC and therefore may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power over and have beneficial ownership of the securities held by Co-Invest B and Sunlight Feeder. Mr. Henry disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities in excess of his pecuniary interest in the securities.

Includes 21,179,370 shares that Sunlight Feeder has the right to acquire upon exercise of Class EX Units (and Class C Common Stock) exchangeable, subject to certain conditions, for either one share of Class A Common Stock, or at Sunlight’s election, an amount of cash equivalent to the market value of one share of Class A Common Stock. The principal business address of Sunlight Feeder and the related entities is 717 Fifth Ave, Floor 12A, New York, NY 10022.

(5)

See footnote 4. Includes 8,437,552 shares held directly by Co-Invest B.

(6)

See footnotes 4 and 5.

148

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS

Subject to the terms of lock-up agreements entered into by former stockholders of Sunlight LLC and the initial stockholders, as applicable, the Selling Securityholders may from time to time offer and sell any or all of the Class A Common Stock set forth below pursuant to this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement. The Selling Securityholders will pay any underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses incurred by the Selling Securityholders for brokerage, accounting, tax or legal services or any other expenses incurred by the Selling Securityholders in disposing of the securities. We will bear the costs, fees and expenses incurred in effecting the registration of the securities covered by this prospectus, including all registration and filing fees, listing fees and fees and expenses of our counsel and our independent registered public accounting firm.

The following table sets forth, as of September 2, 2021, the names of the Selling Securityholders, the aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock held by the Selling Securityholders, the number of shares of our Class A Common Stock that may be sold by the Selling Securityholders under this prospectus and the number of shares of Class A Common Stock that the Selling Securityholders will beneficially own after this offering. For purposes of the table below, we have assumed that (i) after this offering none of the shares of Class A Common Stock covered by this prospectus will be beneficially owned by the Selling Securityholders and (ii) the Selling Securityholders will not acquire beneficial ownership of any additional securities. In addition, we assume that the Selling Securityholders have not sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of, our securities in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the tables have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all securities that they beneficially own, subject to community property laws where applicable.

Unless otherwise noted in the footnotes to the following table, the business address of each executive officer and director of Sunlight is 101 N. Tryon Street, Suite 1000, Charlotte, NC 28246.

The Selling Securityholders may sell or otherwise transfer all, some or none of such shares in this offering. See “Plan of Distribution.”

	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned Before Sale of All Shares of Class A Common Stock Offered Hereby				Number of Shares of Class A Common Stock to be Sold in the Offering		Number of Shares Beneficially Owned After Sale of All Shares of Class A Common Stock Offered Hereby
	Number		%(1)		Number		Number		%
FTV and Tiger Entities
FTV V, L.P.(2)		25,271,539		29.8%		25,271,539		0		0.0%
Tiger Infrastructure Partners Sunlight Feeder LP(3)		21,179,370		25.0%		21,179,370		0		0.0%
Tiger Infrastructure Partners Co-Invest B LP(4)		8,437,552		9.0%		8,437,552		0		0.0%
PIPE Investors
Adage Capital Partners L.P.(5)		1,600,000		1.9%		1,600,000		0		0.0%
AGR Trading SPC-Series EC Segregated Portfolio(6)		9,457		*%		9,457		0		0.0%
Alyeska Master Fund, L.P.(7)		1,300,000		1.5%		1,300,000		0		0.0%
Anatole Partners Long Only Master Fund, L.P(8)		15,820		*%		15,280		0		0.0%
Anatole Partners Master Fund, L.P.(9)		184,180		*		184,180		0		0.0
Arena Capital Fund, LP – Series 3(10)		150,000		*%		150,000		0		0.0%
Arena Capital Fund, LP – Series 4(11)		150,000		*%		150,000		0		0.0%
Arena Capital Fund, LP – Series 5(12)		150,000		*%		150,000		0		0.0%
Arena Capital Fund, LP – Series 6(13)		150,000		*%		150,000		0		0.0%

149

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned Before Sale of All Shares of Class A Common Stock Offered Hereby				Number of Shares of Class A Common Stock to be Sold in the Offering		Number of Shares Beneficially Owned After Sale of All Shares of Class A Common Stock Offered Hereby
	Number		%(1)		Number		Number		%
Arena Capital Fund, LP – Series 9(14)		100,000		*%		100,000		0		0.0%
Andrew Artz		5,000		*%		5,000		0		0.0%
Atlas Point Energy Infrastructure Fund, LLC(15)		600,000		*%		600,000		0		0.0%
BEMAP Master Fund Ltd(16)		82,896		*%		57,157		25,539		*%
Bespoke Alpha MAC MIM LP(17)		10,345		*%		7,388		2,957		*%
BlackRock, Inc.(18)		2,000,000		2.4%		2,000,000		0		0.0%
Blackstone Aqua Master Sub-Fund, a sub fund of Global Master Fund ICAV(19)		400,000		*%		400,000		0		0.0%
BNP Paribas Asset Management UK Limited on behalf of BNP Paribas Funds Energy Transition(20)		1,100,000		1.3%		1,100,000		0		0.0%
Boothbay Absolute Return Strategies, L.P.(21)		17,464		*%		17,464		0		0.0%
CHACHACHA 2019 TRUST DTD 9/20/2019(22)		2,872,500		3.4%		2,872,500		0		0.0%
Citadel Multi-Strategy Equities Master Fund Ltd.(23)		500,000		*%		500,000		0		0.0%
Coatue US 37 LLC(24)		3,000,000		3.5%		3,000,000		0		0.0%
CVI Investments, Inc.(25)		290,000		*%		290,000		0		0.0%
Davidson Kempner Institutional Partners, L.P.(26)		214,440		*%		214,440		0		0.0%
Davidson Kempner International, Ltd.(27)		263,400		*%		263,400		0		0.0%
Davidson Kempner Partners(28)		104,460		*%		104,460		0		0.0%
DS Liquid Div RVA MON LLC(29)		64,756		*%		48,206		16,550		*%
Electron Global Master Fund, L.P.(30)		571,861		*%		571,861		0		0.0%
Electron Infrastructure Fund, L.P.(31)		401,218		*%		401,218		0		0.0%
Franklin Strategic Series – Franklin Natural Resources Fund(32)		74,343		*%		74,343		0		0.0%
Franklin Strategic Series – Franklin Small Cap Growth Fund(33)		714,286		*%		714,286		0		0.0%
Franklin Strategic Series – Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund(34)		963,371		1.1%		963,371		0		0.0%
Franklin Templeton Investment Funds – Franklin Natural Resources Fund(35)		139,943		*%		139,943		0		0.0%
Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust – Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth VIP Fund(36)		108,057		*%		108,057		0		0.0%
Ghisallo Master Fund LP(37)		300,000		*%		300,000		0		0.0%
Hite Carbon Offset LP(38)		18,500		*%		18,500		0		0.0%
Hite Carbon Offset Ltd.(39)		40,900		*%		40,900		0		0.0%
Hite Energy LP(40)		33,800		*%		33,800		0		0.0%
Hite Hedge LP(41)		23,700		*%		23,700		0		0.0%
Hite Hedge Offshore Ltd.(42)		64,300		*%		64,300		0		0.0%
Hite Hedge QP LP(43)		10,200		*%		10,200		0		0.0%
Hite MLP LP(44)		8,600		*%		8,600		0		0.0%
Integrated Core Strategies (US) LLC(45)		500,000		*%		500,000		0		0.0%

150

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned Before Sale of All Shares of Class A Common Stock Offered Hereby				Number of Shares of Class A Common Stock to be Sold in the Offering		Number of Shares Beneficially Owned After Sale of All Shares of Class A Common Stock Offered Hereby
	Number		%(1)		Number		Number		%
MMF LT, LLC(46)		600,000		*%		600,000		0		0.0%
Monashee Pure Alpha SPV I LP(47)		48,262		*%		33,972		14,290		*%
Monashee Solitario Fund LP(48)		59,240		*%		43,577		15,663		*%
M.H. Davidson & Co.(49)		17,700		*%		17,700		0		0.0%
NB All Cap Alpha Master Fund Ltd.(50)		30,000		*%		30,000		0		0.0%
Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds – Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund(51)		1,800,000		2.1%		1,800,000		0		0.0%
Neuberger Berman US Long Short Equity Fund(52)		170,000		*%		170,000		0		0.0%
Nineteen77 Global Merger Arbitrage Master Limited(53)		92,300		*%		92,300		0		0.0%
Nineteen77 Global Merger Arbitrage Opportunity Fund(54)		15,400		*%		15,400		0		0.0%
Nineteen77 Global Multi-Strategy Alpha Master Limited(55)		92,300		*%		92,300		0		0.0%
Connor Nowinski		5,000		*%		5,000		0		0.0%
Eugene Pang		10,000		*%		10,000		0		0.0%
Park West Investors Master Fund, Limited(56)		273,000		*%		273,000		0		0.0%
Park West Partners International, Limited(57)		27,000		*%		27,000		0		0.0%
Justin Saslaw		5,000		*%		5,000		0		0.0%
Schonfeld Strategic 460 Fund LLC(58)		200,000		*%		200,000		0		0.0%
Senator Global Opportunity Master Fund L.P.(59)		1,100,000		1.3%		1,100,000		0		0.0%
SFL SPV I LLC(60)		9,700		*%		9,700		0		0.0%
Soroban Opportunities Master Fund LP(61)		1,000,000		1.2%		1,000,000		0		0.0%
The Steven Trieu Living Trust dtd 4.3.12(62)		100,000		*%		100,000		0		0.0%
The Tolia-Zaveri Living Trust dated Dec 2017(63)		2,500		*%		2,500		0		0.0%
Ravi Tanuku		10,000		*%		10,000		0		0.0%
Yaupon Master Fund LP(64)		100,000		*%		100,000		0		0.0%
Officers of Sunlight
Matt Potere(65)		3,510,541		4.0%		3,510,541		0		0.0%
Barry Edinburg(66)		2,341,446		2.7%		2,341,446		0		0.0%
Tim Parsons(67)		1,386,399		1.6%		1,386,399		0		0.0%
Scott Mulloy(68)		1,231,024		1.4%		1,231,024		0		0.0%
Nora Dahlman(69)		1,149,568		1.3%		1,149,568		0		0.0%
Yehonathan Cohen(70)		959,179		1.1%		959,179		0		0.0%
Marnie Woodward(71)		468,361		0.5%		468,361		0		0.0%
Sponsor
Spartan Acquisition Sponsor II LLC(72)		17,237,241		18.2%		17,237,241		0		0.0%
Other Class EX Unitholders (and Class C Common Stockholders)
Route 66 Sunlight Holdings, LLC(73)		6,617,169		7.2%		6,617,169		0		0.0%
Michael G. Ruehlman(74)		503,690		*%		503,690		0		0.0%
Jason Chen(75)		327,147		*%		327,147		0		0.0%
Joshua M. Goldberg(76)		286,734		*%		286,734		0		0.0%

151

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned Before Sale of All Shares of Class A Common Stock Offered Hereby				Number of Shares of Class A Common Stock to be Sold in the Offering		Number of Shares Beneficially Owned After Sale of All Shares of Class A Common Stock Offered Hereby
	Number		%(1)		Number		Number		%
Steve Ruggeri(77)		131,409		*%		131,409		0		0.0%
Daniel Graf von der Schulenberg(78)		53,791		*%		53,791		0		0.0%
The Estate of Paul Ho(79)		19,980		*%		19,980		0		0.0%
Joe Slamm(80)		6,732		*%		6,732		0		0.0%
Jonathan Lee(81)		2,690		*%		2,690		0		0.0%
SL Investor III LLC(82)		5,082,644		5.7%		5,082,644		0		0.0%
Wilson Chang(83)		778,013		*%		778,013		0		0.0%
Former Directors of Spartan
John Michael Stice(84)		50,000		*%		50,000		0		0.0%
Jan C. Wilson(85)		50,000		*%		50,000		0		0.0%

	Number of Private Placement Warrants Beneficially Owned Prior to Offering				Private Placement Warrants Being Offered Hereby		Number of Private Placement Warrants Beneficially Owned After Offering
	Number		%		Number		Number		%
Spartan Acquisition Sponsor II LLC(86)		9,900,000		100.0%		9,900,000		0		0.0%

Indicates less than 1%

(1)

The percentage of beneficial ownership before this offering is calculated based on 84,837,655 (excludes 1,535,941 of shares held by Sunlight in respect of net withholding for tax payments) shares of our Class A Common Stock outstanding as of September 2, 2021. As applicable, shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially owned through redemption or warrant rights are aggregated with the amount of shares outstanding indicated above in determining the percentage ownership. Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned by them. When applicable, shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially owned through redemption or warrant rights are aggregated with the amount of shares outstanding indicated above in determining the diluted percentage ownership.

(2)

FTV V, L.P. (“FTV LP”) directly holds 25,271,539 shares of Class A Common Stock. The general partner of FTV LP is FTV Management V, L.L.C. (“FTV LLC”). FTV LLC is controlled by its managing members. Any action by FTV LLC with respect to the reported securities, including voting and dispositive decisions, requires at least a majority vote of the managing members.

(3)

All of the shares reported are shares of Class A Common Stock subject to issuance upon redemption of an equivalent amount of Class EX Units (and Class C Common Stock) held by Tiger Infrastructure Partners Sunlight Feeder LP (“Sunlight Feeder”). The entities that manage Sunlight Feeder include: Tiger Infrastructure Associates GP LP, a Delaware limited partnership; Emil Henry IV LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Henry Tiger Holdings II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and Emil Henry LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The natural person having voting or investment control over the shares held by Sunlight Feeder is Emil W. Henry, Jr. The address of Sunlight Feeder is 717 Fifth Ave, Floor 12A, New York, NY 10022.

(4)

Includes 8,437,552 shares held directly by Tiger Infrastructure Partners Co-Invest B LP (“Co-Invest B”). The entities that manage Co-Invest B include: Tiger Infrastructure Associates GP Co-Invest B LP, a Delaware limited partnership; Emil Henry VI LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Henry Tiger Holdings III LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and Emil Henry LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The natural person having voting or investment control over the shares held by Sunlight Feeder is Emil W. Henry, Jr. The address of Co-Invest B is 717 Fifth Ave, Floor 12A, New York, NY 10022.

(5)

The address of such entity is 200 Clarendon St., 52nd Floor, Boston, MA 02116.

152

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(6)

Electron Capital Partners, LLC, as Sub-Investment Advisor, manages such entity. The natural person having voting or investment control over the shares held by such entity is James Shaver, as Managing Member of the Sub-Investment Advisor, Electron Capital Partners, LLC. The address of AGR Trading SPC-Series EC Segregated Portfolio is 10 East 53rd Street, 19th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(7)

The address of Alyeska Master Fund, L.P. is Alyeska Master Fund, L.P. c/o Maples Corporate Services Limited, P.O. Box 309, Ugland House, South Church Street, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands, British West Indies.

(8)

The general partner of such entity is Anatole Partners Long Only GP Ltd. The natural persons having voting and investment control over the shares held by such entity are Xiofan Yang and Gary Lee. The address of such entity is 17/F, Southland Building, 48 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong.

(9)

The general partner of such entity is Anatole Partners GP Ltd. The natural persons having voting and investment control over the shares held by such entity are Xiofan Yang and Gary Lee. The address of such entity is 17/F, Southland Building, 48 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong.

(10)