Table of Contents

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

OR

OR

OR

Commission file number: 001-36458

Neovasc Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Not Applicable

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

Canada

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Suite 5138 — 13562 Maycrest Way, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada V6V 2J7

(Address of principal executive offices)

Chris Clark, Chief Financial Officer; Tel (604) 248-4138; Fax (604) 270-4384

Suite 5138 — 13562 Maycrest Way, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada V6V 2J7

(Name, Telephone, E-mail, and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

​

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: The Registrant had 67,654,729 Common Shares outstanding as of December 31, 2021.

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act

☐ Yes ☒ No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

☐ Yes ☒ No

Table of Contents

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

☒Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

☒ Yes ☐No

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

​

​

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the Registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

​

​

If “Other” has been check in response to the previous question, by check mark which financial statement item Registrant has elected to follow:

☒ Item 17 ☐ Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

☐ Yes ☒ No

​

​

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

​

​

​

i

Table of Contents

GENERAL MATTERS

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F (the “Annual Report”), all references to the “Company”, “Neovasc”, “our”, “us” or “we” refer to Neovasc Inc. and its subsidiary, unless the context clearly requires otherwise. Certain terms used herein are defined in the text and others are included in the glossary of terms. See “Glossary of Terms”.

Neovasc uses the United States dollar as its reporting currency. All references to “$” or “US$” are to United States dollars and references to “C$” are to Canadian dollars. On March 8, 2022, the daily average exchange rate for the conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars as reported by the Bank of Canada was C$1.00 = US$0.7772. See also Item 3 — “Key Information” for more detailed currency and conversion information.

On December 31, 2019, the Company identified certain accounting differences requiring restatement of previously issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. The accounting differences are related to Reducer units purchased for research and development during the year ended December 31, 2017 and recognized as product development and clinical trials expenses during that period. Not all of the units were used for product development and clinical trials and during the year ended December 31, 2019, as Reducer revenue increased, the Company used certain of those units in commercial activities. In order to correctly state the cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the correct period expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 the Company has restated the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 to include those Reducer units as research and development supplies assets with potential future economic value at the end of each of those periods. All references relating to financial information for the years ended December 2018 and 2017 have been adjusted to be reflected in this Annual Report.

​

​

Table of Contents

​

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that may not be based on historical fact, including, without limitation, statements containing the words “expect”, “believe”, “may”, “plan”, “will”, “estimate”, “continue”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “potential”, “seek”, “explore” and similar words or expressions. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as the factors we believe are appropriate. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report include, but are not limited to, statements relating to:

2

Table of Contents

will be filed with data from the Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”) study which may take three years or more to complete;

3

​

Table of Contents

Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions made by the Company in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors that the Company believes are appropriate in the circumstances. Many factors could cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:

4

​

Table of Contents

5

​

Table of Contents

Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties and are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by us, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties and contingencies, many of which, with respect to future events, are subject to change. The material factors and assumptions used by us to develop such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

By their very nature, forward-looking statements or information involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, events or developments, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information. In evaluating these statements, prospective purchasers should specifically consider various factors, including the risks outlined herein, under Item 3.D “Risk Factors”. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties or a risk that is not currently known to us materialize, or should assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Annual Report and we do not intend, and do not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements due to their inherent uncertainty.

6

​

Table of Contents

The Company advises you that these cautionary remarks expressly qualify in their entirety all forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf.

​

7

​

Table of Contents

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

This glossary contains general terms used in the discussion of the cardiovascular medical device industry, as well as specific technical terms used in the descriptions of the Company’s technology and business.

Aortic: of or pertaining to the aorta or aortic heart valve.

Artery: blood vessel that carries oxygenated blood from the heart to the body’s organs.

Balloon catheter: hollow tube with a tiny balloon on its tip, used for gaining access to the arteries; once the catheter is in position, the balloon is inflated in order to push open a section of artery that is obstructed (see Angioplasty).

Biocompatible: materials that can be implanted or used in a patient without the body reacting adversely to the material.

Bovine: of or derived from or pertaining to a cow.

Cardiac reconstruction: procedure to repair damaged portions of the heart in order to improve its function.

Cardiovascular: system encompassing the heart, veins and arteries.

Cardiovascular disease: disease that restricts blood flow within the arteries, generally due to a build-up of Plaque; may refer to coronary or peripheral arteries, or both.

Catheter: hollow tube used for gaining access to the arteries, either to deliver medications or devices, or to withdraw fluids or samples from the body.

CE Mark: designation used to signify regulatory approval for the sale of a product in the European Union.

Coronary Artery: artery that supplies oxygen-rich blood to the heart muscle.

Coronary Artery Disease: disease that affects the Coronary Arteries (the arteries that provide oxygenated blood to the heart muscle); also called cardiovascular disease. (See Cardiovascular Disease).

COSIRA: the Company’s Coronary Sinus Reducer for Treatment of Refractory Angina clinical trial — a multi-center, double blinded sham-controlled study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a rigorous, controlled manner.

COSIRA-II: the Company’s Coronary Sinus Reducer for Treatment of Refractory Angina clinical trial — a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial of approximately 380 participants at up to 35 investigational centers in North America who will be randomized and followed through 5 years.

FDA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; governing body that regulates approval for the sale of medical devices in the United States.

French: the French size is a measure of the external diameter of a catheter, a catheter of 1 French has a diameter of ⅓ mm.

Health Canada: the federal department of health of Canada responsible for the regulation of drugs, natural health products, cosmetics and medical devices and includes the Therapeutic Products Directorate, which in turn includes the Medical Devices Bureau.

IDE: an investigational device exemption, which allows the investigational device to be used in a U.S. clinical study in order to collect safety and effectiveness data required to support a PMA application or a Pre-market Notification 510(k) submission to the FDA. All clinical evaluations of investigational devices in the United States, unless exempt, must have an approved IDE before the study is initiated.

Interventional Cardiology: practice of treating Coronary Artery Disease intravascularly; that is, through the arterial system using minimally invasive techniques, rather than with open-heart surgery.

8

​

Table of Contents

MDD: Medical Device Directive a directive intended to harmonise the laws relating to medical devices within the European Union.

MDR: Medical Devices Regulation, which replaced MDD on May 21, 2021.

Mitral: of or pertaining to the mitral heart valve.

Mitral Regurgitation: inadequate function of the mitral valve allowing blood to leak back through the closed valve. This is a severe and debilitating medical condition.

Nasdaq: the Nasdaq Capital Market.

Pericardium: sac in the chest cavity that contains the heart; pericardial tissue is the soft tissue that forms the sac.

Peripatch^TM: tissue material made from bovine or Porcine pericardium; used to repair damaged/diseased vessels or organs by working as an internal bandage or as a component in the manufacture of heart valves.

Plaque: deposit of fats, cholesterol and other substances on artery walls that eventually causes arteries to become narrowed, restricting proper blood flow.

Porcine: of or derived from or pertaining to a swine or pig.

PMA: Premarket Approval; the FDA process of scientific and regulatory review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Class III medical devices.

Reducer: the Neovasc Reducer^TM, Neovasc’s proprietary technology for the treatment of refractory angina.

SMG: the Strul Medical Group.

Stent: expandable, metallic tube inserted into a diseased artery to hold vessel open and maintain proper blood flow; may be used to deliver medication to the artery wall (a “drug-eluting stent”).

Tiara: the Tiara^TM, Neovasc’s proprietary transcatheter mitral valve system in development for the transcatheter treatment of mitral valve disease.

Tiara TA: the Tiara transapical device, that is implanted via the apex of the heart through a small incision between the ribs.

Tiara TF: the Tiara transfemoral device, that is implanted through an access point in the femoral artery in the groin.

TIARA-I: the Company’s multinational, multicenter early feasibility study being conducted to assess the safety and performance of the Tiara in high risk surgical contexts.

TIARA-II: the Company’s multinational, multicenter study evaluating the Tiara’s safety and performance. It is expected that data from this study will be used to file for CE Mark approval.

Transcatheter: implanted or completed via a catheter or small tube instead of surgically.

Transcatheter heart valves: specialized artificial heart valves which are implanted via a catheter rather than a traditional surgical approach.

TSX: the Toronto Stock Exchange.

Vein: blood vessel that carries de-oxygenated blood from the body organs to the heart.

Vessel: artery, vein or duct that carries blood through the body.

​

9

​

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

likely that the Company will initiate programs that will require additional significant expenditures and that the cash needs of the Company will likely increase, shortening the time the proceeds will meet the requirements of the Company.  These circumstances indicate the existence of material uncertainty and cast substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company will re-evaluate the going concern risk at each reporting period and will remove the going concern and uncertainty note when the Company can depend on the profitable commercialization of its products or is confident of obtaining additional debt or equity financing to fund ongoing operations until profitability is achieved, if at all.  The Company will need to obtain additional debt or equity financing to fund ongoing operations. The Company can give no assurance that it will be able to raise the additional funds needed, on terms agreeable to the Company, or at all.

The audited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The recent coronavirus outbreak or other health epidemics could significantly impact our operations, sales or ability to raise capital.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China. The outbreak was initially concentrated in China, although numerous cases continue to be confirmed in other countries. Our results of operations could be adversely affected to the extent that the coronavirus or any other epidemic harms the global economy. We may also experience impacts to certain of our or suppliers as a result of a health epidemic or other outbreak occurring in one or more of our markets. Further, our operations have and may further experience disruptions, such as temporary closure of our offices and/or those of our suppliers and suspension of services, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such a significant outbreak of contagious diseases in the human population could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets of many countries, which could in turn adversely impact our ability to raise capital. The duration of the business disruption and related financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time but may materially affect our consolidated results for the first quarter and fiscal year 2022. The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others.

We have significant additional future capital needs and there are uncertainties as to our ability to raise additional funding.

We require significant additional capital resources to expand our business, in particular the further development of our medical devices. Technical innovations often require substantial time and investment before we can determine commercial viability. Advancing our products, market expansion of our currently marketed products or acquisition and development of any new products or medical devices will require considerable resources and additional access to capital markets. In addition, our future cash requirements may vary materially from those now expected. For example, our future capital requirements may increase if:

11

​

Table of Contents

We could potentially seek additional funding through corporate collaborations and licensing arrangements, through public or private equity or debt financing, or through other transactions. However, if sales are slow to increase or if capital market conditions in general, or with respect medical device companies such as ours, are unfavorable, our ability to obtain significant additional funding on acceptable terms, if at all, will be negatively affected. Additional financing that we may pursue may involve the sale of our Common Shares or financial instruments that are exchangeable for, or convertible into, our Common Shares which could result in significant dilution to our shareholders.

If sufficient capital is not available, we may be required to delay our business expansion or our research and development projects, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, prospects or results of operations.

Sales of a significant number of Common Shares in the public markets, or the perception of such sales, have depressed and may continue to depress the market price of the Common Shares.

Sales of a substantial number of Common Shares or other equity-related securities in the public markets by the Company or its shareholders could depress the market price of the Common Shares and impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities.

Our Common Shares may be delisted from the Nasdaq or the TSX, which could affect their market price and liquidity. If our Common Shares were to be delisted, investors may have difficulty in disposing of their shares.

Our Common Shares are currently listed on the Nasdaq and on the TSX under the symbol “NVCN”. We must meet continuing listing requirements to maintain the listing of our Common Shares on the Nasdaq and the TSX. For example, for continued listing, the Nasdaq requires, among other things, that an issuer’s listed securities maintain a minimum bid price of at least US$1.00 per share pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). On May 25, 2021, the Company received the Notification Letters from the Nasdaq notifying that the Company is not currently in compliance with the Nasdaq’s Minimum Bid Price Requirements and has 180 calendar days, or until November 22, 2021, to regain compliance. Further to this, the Company announced that it has received written notification from the Nasdaq notifying the Company that in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(i), the Company requested and was granted a second 180-calendar day period, or until May 23, 2022, within which to evidence compliance with the Nasdaq’s Minimum Bid Price Requirements.

In addition to the specified criteria for continued listing, the Nasdaq also has broad discretionary public interest authority that it can exercise to apply additional or more stringent criteria for the continued listing of the Common Shares, or suspend or delist securities even though the securities met all enumerated criteria for continued listing on the Nasdaq. The Nasdaq has exercised this discretionary authority in the past and we cannot assure you that the Nasdaq will not exercise such discretionary authority.

There can be no assurance that our Common Shares will remain listed on the Nasdaq or the TSX. If we fail to meet compliance with any of the Nasdaq’s or the TSX’s continued listing requirements, our Common Shares may be delisted. Any delisting of our Common Shares may adversely affect a shareholder’s ability to dispose, or obtain quotations as to the market value, of such shares.

In connection with the preparation and audit of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting were identified, which means that a reasonable possibility exists that material misstatements in the Company’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) and applicable Canadian securities laws require an annual assessment by management of the effectiveness of the Company’s ICFR. The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of its President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s ICFR as of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. As a result of this evaluation, management concluded that it did not have appropriate controls in place to perform an effective risk assessment process, to design and implement controls supported by documentation and to provide evidence that such controls were designed and operating effectively, which contributed to a material weakness as the Company did not correctly account for Reducer units initially purchased for research and development and subsequently used for commercial activities. A material weakness, as defined in National Instrument 52-109 of the Canadian Securities Administrators and Rule 12b-2 under the U.S. Exchange Act, is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in ICFR, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

In light of the identified material weakness, the Company was unable to conclude that it had effective ICFR as of December 31, 2019 in accordance with Section 404 of SOX and applicable Canadian securities laws. The Company’s inability to maintain effective

12

​

Table of Contents

ICFR could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of the Company’s financial statements, which in turn could harm its business and negatively impact the trading price or the market value of its securities. In light of the aforementioned material weakness, management conducted a thorough review of all research and development supplies and has developed and implemented a remediation plan to strengthen the operating effectiveness of ICFR. As a result of this review, management believes that there are no material inaccuracies or omissions of material fact and, to the best its knowledge, believes that the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 fairly present in all material respects and the financial condition and results of operations for the Company in conformity with IFRS.

Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s ICFR as of December 31, 2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, management determined that the Company maintained effective ICFR as of December 31, 2021.

If the Company is unable to discover and address any other control deficiencies, this could result in inaccuracies in its financial statements and could also impair its ability to comply with applicable financial reporting requirements and make related regulatory filings on a timely basis. No evaluation can provide complete assurance that the Company’s ICFR will detect or uncover all failures of persons within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be reported. The effectiveness of the Company’s processes, procedures and controls could also be limited by simple errors or faulty judgments. As the Company continues to expand, the challenges involved in implementing appropriate ICFR will increase and will require that the Company continue to monitor its ICFR.

Our Common Share price has experienced significant volatility and may be subject to fluctuation in the future based on market conditions

The market prices for the securities of medical companies, including our own, have historically been highly volatile. The market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of any particular company. In addition, because of the nature of our business, certain factors such as our announcements and the public’s reaction, our operating performance and the performance of competitors and other similar companies, government regulations, changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by research analysts who track our securities or securities of other companies in the medical sector, general market conditions, announcements relating to litigation, the arrival or departure of key personnel and the other factors listed under the heading “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” can have an adverse impact on the market price of the Common Shares. For example, from January 1, 2021 to March 8, 2022, the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX has ranged from a high of C$2.88 to a low of C$0.51 and from January 1, 2021 to March 8, 2022 the closing price of the Common Shares on the Nasdaq has ranged from a high of $2.29 to a low of $0.40.

Any negative change in the public’s perception of our prospects could cause the price of our securities, including the price of our Common Shares, to decrease dramatically. Furthermore, any negative change in the public’s perception of the prospects of medical device companies in general or future exercises or conversions of the securities issued in connection with the Company’s previous financings could depress the price of our securities, including the price of our Common Shares, regardless of our results. Following declines in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class-action litigation is often instituted. Litigation of this type, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

Our significant indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition, and we could have difficulty fulfilling our obligations under our indebtedness, which may have a material adverse effect on us.

As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately $7,350,244 of secured indebtedness from the issuance of the convertible 2019 Notes that mature on May 16, 2023 and $5,673,618 of secured indebtedness from the issuance of the convertible 2020 Notes that mature on May 26, 2024. Our significant level of indebtedness increases the risk that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay amounts due in respect of our indebtedness. The level of our indebtedness could have other important consequences on our business, including:

13

​

Table of Contents

The occurrence of any one or more of these circumstances could have a material adverse effect on us. Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our indebtedness, depends on and is subject to our financial and operating performance, which in turn is affected by general and regional economic, financial, competitive, business, and other factors (many of which are beyond our control), including the availability of financing in the international banking and capital markets. We cannot be certain that our business will generate sufficient cash flows from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to repay or refinance our debt, or to fund our other liquidity needs. If we are unable to make our scheduled payments on our debt or to fund our other liquidity needs, we will need to restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt. Failure to successfully restructure or refinance our debt could cause us to default on our debt obligations and would impair our liquidity. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants that could further restrict our business operations.

Moreover, in the event of a default, the holders of the applicable indebtedness could elect to declare all the funds borrowed to be due and payable. We cannot be certain that our assets or cash flows would be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt instruments if accelerated upon an event of default.

The Company is subject to lawsuits that could divert its resources and result in the payment of significant damages and other remedies.

From time to time, the Company may be subject to litigation claims through the ordinary course of its business operations or otherwise, regarding, among other things, intellectual property rights matters, employment matters and tax matters. Litigation to defend the Company against claims by third parties, or to enforce any rights that the Company may have against third parties, may be necessary, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of the Company’s resources, causing a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. Given the nature of the Company’s business, it is, and may from time to time in the future be, party to various, and at times numerous, legal, administrative and regulatory inquiries, investigations, proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, as well as potential class action lawsuits. Because the outcome of such legal matters is inherently uncertain, if one or more of such legal matters were to be resolved against the Company for amounts in excess of management’s expectations or any applicable insurance coverage or indemnification right, the Company’s results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Any litigation to which the Company is a party may result in an onerous or unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed upon appeal, or in payments of substantial monetary damages or fines, the posting of bonds requiring significant collateral, letters of credit or similar instruments, or the Corporation may decide to settle lawsuits on similarly unfavorable terms. Moreover, the Company cannot be sure that the remedies available to it at law or under contract, or the indemnification granted to it by sellers of acquired companies, will be sufficient in amount, scope or duration to fully or partially offset any such possible liabilities. Any of these factors, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, cash flows or liquidity. For a description of certain currently pending legal and regulatory proceedings, see Item 8.A “Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information — Legal Proceedings” of this Annual Report.

The Company was engaged in litigation with Edwards Lifesciences CardiAQ LLC (“CardiAQ”), formerly known as CardiAQ Valve Technologies Inc., as further described below. Litigation resulting from CardiAQ’s claims has been, and is expected to continue to be, costly and time-consuming and could divert the attention of management and key personnel from our business operations. We cannot assure that we will succeed in defending any of these claims and that further judgments will not be entered against us with respect to the litigation resulting from such claims. If we are unsuccessful in our defense of these claims or unable to settle the claims in a manner satisfactory to us, we may be faced with significant monetary damages that could exceed our resources and/or loss of intellectual property rights that could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its financial position.

14

​

Table of Contents

On June 6, 2014, Neovasc was named in a lawsuit filed by CardiAQ in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts concerning intellectual property rights ownership, unfair trade practices and a breach of contract relating to Neovasc’s transcatheter mitral valve technology, including the Tiara (“CardiAQ v. Neovasc Inc.”). On May 19, 2016, a jury awarded $70 million in favor of CardiAQ on certain trade secret claims. On October 31, 2016, a judge awarded an additional $21 million in enhanced damages to the jury’s award. On January 18, 2017, a judge granted CardiAQ’s motion for pre- and post-judgment interest. Neovasc and CardiAQ each appealed on various grounds. The judgment in the District of Massachusetts case, including the pre- and post- judgment interest amounts, was stayed pending completion of the appeal pursuant to a court order of December 23, 2016. Under the terms of the stay, Neovasc deposited $70 million into a joint escrow account and entered into a general security agreement related to the remaining damages awarded by the court. On September 1, 2017, the Appeals Court affirmed the trial court judgment against Neovasc, and denied CardiAQ’s cross-appeal. On November 13, 2017, the final mandate was issued by the Appeals Court and approximately $70 million was released from escrow to CardiAQ to partially settle approximately $112 million damages and interest awards. Upon closing of the 2017 Financings on November 17, 2017, the Company used approximately $42 million from the $65 million net proceeds of the 2017 Financings to settle the remaining damages and interest awards.

On June 23, 2014, CardiAQ filed a complaint against Neovasc in Munich, Germany (the “German Court”) requesting that Neovasc assign its right to one of its European patent applications to CardiAQ. After a hearing held on December 14, 2016, the German Court rendered its decision on June 16, 2017, granting co-ownership of the European patent application to CardiAQ but denying their claim for full entitlement. On July 14, 2017, Neovasc filed a notice of appeal against the German Court’s decision with the Appeals Court of (the “Appeals Court”) Munich. On July 20, 2017, CardiAQ filed a notice of appeal with the same court. The decision of the Appeals Court of Munich was rendered on March 21, 2019, wherein it amended the decision of the German Court and dismissed the complaint of CardiAQ in full. On March 30, 2020, the German Supreme Court granted CardiAQ leave to appeal the Appeals Court decision and at a hearing held on August 4, 2020 the German Supreme Court set aside the prior decision of the Appeals Court and remanded the matter back to the Appeals Court for a new hearing and decision. The hearing at the Appeals Court was held on February 25, 2021.

On May 20, 2021, the Appeals Court upheld the first instance judgment of the German Court of June 16, 2017, in which the court had found that CardiAQ had contributed in part to the invention of the Tiara and awarded to CardiAQ co-entitlement rights to the disputed Tiara European patent application.  There are no monetary awards associated with these matters (except for a decision on the statutory costs of the proceedings) and no damages award was recognized.  Regarding the statutory costs of the proceedings, each party is responsiblefor 50% of the costs of the appeal proceedings before the Appeals Court.  Neovasc alone bears the costs of the second appeal proceedings before the German Supreme Court and 50% of the court fees for the first instance proceedings.  Neovasc has not appealed this decision to preserve capital and move forward with our new strategic activities.  The decision is now final.

On March 24, 2017, CardiAQ filed a related lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (the “Court”), asserting two claims for correction of patent inventorship as to Neovasc’s U.S. Patents Nos. 9,241,790 and 9,248,014. On October 4, 2017, CardiAQ amended its pleading to add a third claim for correction of patent inventorship as to Neovasc’s U.S. Patent No. 9,770,329. The lawsuit did not seek money damages and would not have prevented the Company from practicing these patents. The Company moved to dismiss the complaint on November 16, 2017, and the Court denied this motion on September 28, 2018. On April 17, 2019, the Company resolved the three claims for correction of patent inventorship and, without reaching conclusion on the merits of the claims, the parties agreed to the correction of patent inventorship and added co-inventors to the three patents in question. Each party will bear its own costs. There were no monetary awards associated with these matters and no damages award was recognized.

On January 22, 2019, the Company announced that pursuant to a settlement reached with Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc. and Edwards Lifesciences (Canada) Inc. (collectively, the “Edwards Plaintiffs”), the patent infringement action that the Edwards Plaintiffs had previously commenced in the Federal Court of Canada against the Company, Boston Scientific Corporation (“Boston Scientific”) and Livanova, would be dismissed on a no-costs basis.

On August 3, 2018, the Company announced that it had entered into a collaboration and licensing agreement (the “Penn Agreement”) with Penn Medicine and the Gorman Cardiovascular Research Group at the University of Pennsylvania (together, “Penn”), which resolved certain potential claims against the Company that had been previously disclosed.

On February 20, 2019, the Company announced that it had entered into a settlement agreement with Endovalve Inc. and Micro Interventional Devices, Inc. (collectively, “Endovalve”), which resolved certain claims against the Company that had been previously disclosed.

15

​

Table of Contents

Shareholder Litigation

On November 5, 2020, a putative shareholder class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “NY Court”) against the Company, Fred Colen, the Company’s CEO, and Christopher Clark, the Company’s CFO (the “Gonzalez Action”). The complaint in the Gonzalez Action purports to bring suit on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Neovasc securities between November 1, 2019 and October 27, 2020, inclusive. On November 25, 2020, a second putative shareholder class action lawsuit was filed in the NY Court against the Company and Messrs. Colen and Clark: (the “Siple Action”). The complaint in the Siple Action purports to bring suit on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Neovasc securities between October 10, 2018 and October 27, 2020, inclusive.

The complaints in both the Gonzalez Action and the Siple Action contain similar allegations that the defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the complaints’ allegations relate to the premarket approval process with the FDA for Neovasc’s Reducer medical device for the treatment of refractory angina.

On January 26, 2021, the NY Court issued an order consolidating the Gonzalez Action and the Siple Action (the “Consolidated Action”). The order also appointed Pratap Golla as Lead Plaintiff and the law firms of Pomerantz LLP and Holzer & Holzer LLC as Co-Lead Counsel for the Class in the Consolidated Action.  The order further directed Lead Plaintiff to file a Consolidated Amended Complaint in the Consolidated Action.  On March 19, 2021, Lead Plaintiff filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint.

The Consolidated Amended Complaint names Neovasc, Messrs. Colen and Clark, Bill Little, and Shmuel Banai as defendants.  The Consolidated Amended Complaint purports to bring suit on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Neovasc securities between October 10, 2018 and January 15, 2021, inclusive.  The Consolidated Amended Complaint contains allegations similar to the complaints in the Gonzalez Action and the Siple Action and asserts the same two causes of action: (i) a violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder against all defendants; and (ii) a violation of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against Messrs. Colen, Clark, Little, and Banai.

The defendants’ motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint was served on June 14, 2021. On February 1, 2022, at the conclusion of oral argument on the defendants’ motion to dismiss, the Consolidated Amended Complaint was dismissed in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend.  On February 22, 2022, the Lead Plaintiff filed an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Third parties may claim we are infringing their intellectual property or have misappropriated their trade secrets and we could suffer significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented from selling products.

We may be involved in substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property and trade secret rights in the medical device industry. We may be subject to challenges by third parties regarding our intellectual property, including, among others, claims regarding validity, enforceability, scope and effective term. From time to time, we have been and may in the future be forced to defend against claims and legal actions alleging infringement of the intellectual property rights of others, and such intellectual property litigation is typically costly and time-consuming. In particular, see Item 8.A “Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information — Legal Proceedings” herein for a description of certain pending and ongoing legal proceedings. Adverse determinations in any such litigation could result in significant liabilities to third parties or injunctions, or could require us to seek licenses from third parties and, if such licenses are not available on commercially reasonable terms, prevent us from manufacturing, selling or using certain products, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, some licenses may be non-exclusive, which could provide our competitors access to the same technologies.

Third parties could also obtain patents that may require us to either redesign products or, if possible, negotiate licenses from such third parties. Such licenses may materially increase our expenses. If we are unable to redesign products or obtain a license, we might have to exit a particular product offering.

The success of our business depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our technology and know-how, and operate without infringing the intellectual property rights of other companies. It is possible that as a result of future litigation our products currently marketed or under development may be found to infringe or otherwise violate third party intellectual property rights. Intellectual property litigation proceedings, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs, inability to market our products including the Tiara, loss of our proprietary rights and diversion of our management’s and technical team’s attention and resources.

16

​

Table of Contents

Our inability to protect our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our success and competitive position are dependent in part upon our proprietary intellectual property. We rely on a combination of patents and trade secrets to protect our proprietary intellectual property, and we expect to continue to do so. Although we seek to protect our proprietary rights through a variety of means, we cannot guarantee that the protective steps we have taken are adequate to protect these rights. Patents issued to or licensed by us in the past or in the future may be challenged and held invalid. The scope of our patent claims also may vary between countries, as individual countries have distinctive patent laws. In addition, as our patents expire, we may be unsuccessful in extending their protection through patent term extensions. The expiration of, or the failure to maintain or extend our patents, could have a material adverse effect on us.

We also rely on confidentiality agreements with certain employees, consultants and other third parties to protect, in part, trade secrets and other proprietary information. These agreements could be breached and we may not have adequate remedies for such a breach. In addition, others could independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or gain access to our trade secrets or proprietary information.

We may spend significant resources to enforce our intellectual property rights and such enforcement could result in litigation. Intellectual property litigation is complex and can be expensive and time-consuming. However, our efforts in this regard may not be successful. We also may not be able to detect infringement. In addition, competitors may design around our technology or develop competing technologies. Patent litigation can result in substantial cost and diversion of effort. Intellectual property protection may also be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries, enabling our competitors to capture increased market position. The invalidation of key intellectual property rights or an unsuccessful outcome in lawsuits filed to protect our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

Our products are continually the subject of clinical trials conducted by us, our competitors, or other third parties, the results of which may be unfavorable, or perceived as unfavorable, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The regulatory approval process for new products and new indications for existing products requires extensive clinical trials and procedures, including early clinical experiences and regulatory studies. Unfavorable or inconsistent clinical data from current or future clinical trials or procedures conducted by us, our competitors, or third parties, or perceptions regarding this clinical data, could adversely affect our ability to obtain necessary approvals and the market’s view of our future prospects. Such clinical trials and procedures are inherently uncertain and there can be no assurance that these trials or procedures will be completed in a timely or cost-effective manner or result in a commercially viable product. Failure to successfully complete these trials or procedures in a timely and cost-effective manner could have a material adverse effect on our prospects. Clinical trials or procedures may experience significant setbacks even after earlier trials have shown promising results. Further, preliminary results from clinical trials or procedures may be contradicted by subsequent clinical analysis. In addition, results from our clinical trials or procedures may not be supported by actual long-term studies or clinical experience. If preliminary clinical results are later contradicted, or if initial results cannot be supported by actual long-term studies or clinical experience, our business could be adversely affected. Clinical trials or procedures may be suspended or terminated by us or regulatory authorities at any time if it is believed that the trial participants face unacceptable health risks.

A number of companies in the medical device industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after positive results in earlier trials. Clinical results are frequently susceptible to varying interpretations that may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approvals. Negative or inconclusive results or adverse medical events during a clinical trial could cause a clinical trial to be delayed, repeated or terminated. In addition, failure to construct appropriate clinical trial protocols could result in the test or control group experiencing a disproportionate number of adverse events and could cause a clinical trial to be repeated or terminated.

Moreover, principal investigators for our clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from time to time and receive compensation in connection with such services. Under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to report some of these relationships to the FDA. The FDA may conclude that a financial relationship between the Company and a principal investigator has created a conflict of interest or otherwise affected interpretation of the study. The FDA may therefore question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing applications by the FDA and may ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of one or more of our product candidates.

17

​

Table of Contents

We have a history of significant losses and a significant accumulated deficit.

We may incur losses in the future and our losses may increase. We have incurred net losses in each fiscal year since inception. In the year ended December 31, 2021, we had a net loss of $24,889,069 and at December 31, 2021, we had an accumulated deficit of $420,116,274. We have increased our research and development expenses in recent periods and we plan further increases in the future as cash flows allow. The planned increases in research and development expenses may result in larger losses in future periods. As a result, we will need to generate significantly greater revenues than we have to date to achieve and maintain profitability. There can be no assurance that revenues will increase. Our business strategies may not be successful and we may not be profitable in any future period. Our operating results have varied in the past and they may continue to fluctuate in the future. In addition, our operating results may not follow any past trends.

We are subject to the risks associated with product liability claims, insurance and recalls.

Prior to patient use, our products undergo extensive clinical testing and are approved by the applicable regulatory authorities. However, despite all reasonable efforts to ensure safety, it is possible that we or our partners may sell products which are defectively manufactured or labeled, contain defective components or are misused. Our products may also fail to meet patient expectations or produce harmful side effects. Such unexpected quality, safety or efficacy issues may be caused by a number of factors, including manufacturing defects, failure to adhere to good clinical practices, failure to adhere to good manufacturing practices, non-compliance with clinical protocols or the presence of other harmful conditions in a clinical trial, inadequacies of product-related information conveyed to physicians or patients, or other factors or circumstances unique to the patient. Whether or not scientifically justified, such unexpected safety or efficacy concerns can arise and may lead to product recalls, loss of or delays in market acceptance, market withdrawals, or declining sales, as well as product liability, consumer fraud and/or other claims. Additionally, we may be exposed to product liability claims from patients in clinical trials. Such liability might result from claims made directly by consumers or by medical device companies or others selling such products. It is impossible to predict the scope of injury or liability from such defects or unexpected reactions, or the impact on the market for such products of any allegations of these claims, even if unsupported, or the measure of damages which might be imposed as a result of any claims or the cost of defending such claims. Substantial damage awards and/or settlements have been handed down — notably in the United States and other common law jurisdictions — against medical device companies based on claims for injuries allegedly caused by the use of their products. Although our shareholders would not have personal liability for such damages, the expenses of litigation or settlements, or both, in connection with any such injuries or alleged injuries and the amount of any award imposed on us in excess of existing insurance coverage, if any, may have a material adverse impact on us and on the price of our Common Shares. In addition, we may not be able to avoid significant product liability exposure even if we take appropriate precautions, including maintaining product liability coverage (subject to deductibles and maximum payouts). Any liability that we may have as a result could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, to the extent insurance coverage for such liability is not available. Product liability claims in the future, regardless of their ultimate outcome, could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and on our ability to attract and retain customers for our products.

Use of our products in unapproved circumstances could expose us to liabilities.

The marketing approval from the FDA and other regulators of certain of our products are, or are expected to be, limited to specific indications. We are prohibited by law from marketing or promoting any unapproved use of our products. Physicians, however, in most jurisdictions, can use these products in ways or circumstances other than those strictly within the scope of the regulatory approval. Although the product training we provide to physicians and other health care professionals is limited to approved uses or for clinical trials, no assurance can be given that claims might not be asserted against us if our products are used in ways or for procedures that are not approved.

We have substantial competition in the medical device industry and with respect to our products.

The medical device industry is highly competitive and is characterized by extensive research and development and rapid technological change. Many companies, as well as research organizations, currently engage in, or have in the past engaged in, efforts related to the development of medical devices in the same therapeutic areas as we do. Due to the size of the cardiovascular market and the large unmet medical need for products that treat cardiovascular illnesses, a number of the world’s largest medical device companies are developing, or could potentially develop, products that could compete with ours.

Many of the companies developing competing technologies and products may have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in discovery, research and development, manufacturing, pre-clinical studies and clinical testing, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing than we do. Other smaller companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through

18

​

Table of Contents

collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. Academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations may also conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for discovery, research, clinical development and marketing of products similar to ours. There is a risk that one or more of our competitors may develop more effective or more affordable products than us and that such competitors will commercialize products that will render our medical devices obsolete. We face competition with respect to product efficacy and safety, ease of use and adaptability to various modes of administration, acceptance by physicians, the timing and scope of regulatory approvals, availability of resources, reimbursement coverage, price and patent positions of others. In addition, these companies and institutions also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified personnel. If we fail to develop new products or enhance our existing products in the face of such strong competition, such competition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our approved products may not achieve or maintain expected levels of market acceptance, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our securities to decline.

Even if we are able to obtain regulatory approvals for our products, the success of those products is dependent upon achieving and maintaining market acceptance. New medical devices that appear promising in development may fail to reach the market or may have only limited or no commercial success. Levels of market acceptance for our products could be impacted by several factors, many of which are not within our control, including but not limited to:

In addition, the success of any new product will depend on our ability to either successfully build our in-house sales capabilities or to secure new, or to realize the benefits of existing arrangements with, third-party marketing or distribution partners. Seeking out, evaluating and negotiating marketing or distribution agreements may involve the commitment of substantial time and effort and may not ultimately result in an agreement. In addition, the third-party marketing or distribution partners may not be as successful in promoting our products as we had anticipated. If we are unable to commercialize new products successfully, whether through a failure to achieve market acceptance, a failure to build our own in-house sales capabilities, a failure to secure new marketing partners or to realize the benefits of our arrangements with existing marketing partners, there may be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and it could cause the market value of our securities to decline.

In addition, by the time any products are ready to be commercialized, the proposed market for these products may have changed. Our estimates of the number of patients who have received or might have been candidates to use a specific product may not accurately reflect the true market or market prices for such products or the extent to which such products, if successfully developed, will actually be used by patients. Our failure to successfully introduce and market our products that are under development would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

If we are not able to convince public payors and hospitals to include our products on their approved product lists, our revenues may not meet expectations and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

The direct cost of implanting or using our medical devices is seldom paid by individual patients. Successful commercialization of such devices will depend largely upon the availability of reimbursement for the surgery and medical costs associated with the product from third-party payors. We expect that our products will be purchased by health-care providers, clinics, and hospitals that will subsequently bill various third-party payors such as government programs and private insurance plans. These expectant payors carefully review and increasingly challenge the prices charged for medical devices and services. Provincial government sponsored health programs in Canada and similar programs in the United States reimburse hospitals a pre-determined fixed amount for the costs associated with a particular procedure based on the patient’s discharge diagnosis and similarly reimburse the surgeon or physician based on the procedure performed, without taking into consideration the actual costs incurred by either party or the actual cost of the device. New

19

​

Table of Contents

products are being scrutinized increasingly with respect to whether or not they will be covered by the various health plans and at what level of reimbursement. Third-party payors may determine that our products are unnecessary, not cost-effective, too experimental, or are primarily intended for non-approved indications.

Our business may be materially adversely affected by new legislation, new regulatory requirements, and the continuing efforts of governmental and third-party payors to contain or reduce the costs of healthcare through various means, including the U.S. healthcare reform legislation signed in 2010.

The government and regulatory authorities in Canada, the United States, Europe and other markets in which we sell our products may propose and adopt new legislation and regulatory requirements relating to medical product approval criteria and manufacturing requirements. Such legislation or regulatory requirements, or the failure to comply with such, could adversely impact our operations and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The growth of overall healthcare costs as a percentage of gross domestic product in many countries means that governments and payors are under intense pressure to control healthcare spending even more tightly. These pressures are particularly strong given the ongoing effects of the global economic and financial crisis, including the continuing debt crisis in certain countries in Europe, and the risk of a similar crisis in the United States. As a result, our businesses and the healthcare industry in general are operating in an ever more challenging environment with very significant pricing pressures. In recent years, national, federal, provincial, state, and local officials and legislators have proposed, or are reportedly considering proposing, a variety of price-based reforms to the healthcare systems in the European Union, the United States and other countries. Some proposals include measures that would limit or eliminate payments for certain medical procedures and treatments or subject pricing to government control. Furthermore, in certain foreign markets, the pricing or profitability of healthcare products is subject to government controls and other measures that have been prepared by legislators and government officials. While we cannot predict whether any such legislative or regulatory proposals or reforms will be adopted, the adoption of any such proposals or reforms could adversely affect the commercial viability of our existing and potential products.

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “ACA”) was enacted. The ACA imposed new taxes on medical device makers in the form of a 2.3% excise tax on all U.S. medical device sales. In 2015, Congress imposed a 2-year moratorium on this medical device tax, so that medical device sales during the period between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017 are exempt from the tax. New legislation was passed in January 2018 that delayed the tax until January 1, 2020, and the tax was repealed in December 2019 pursuant to the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act. The device tax, if reinstated, could materially and adversely affect our business, cash flows and results of operations. The ACA also focuses on a number of Medicare provisions aimed at improving quality and decreasing costs. It is uncertain at this point what negative unintended consequences these provisions will have on patient access to new technologies. The Medicare provisions include value-based payment programs, increased funding of comparative effectiveness research, reduced hospital payments for avoidable readmissions and hospital acquired conditions, and pilot programs to evaluate alternative payment methodologies that promote care coordination (such as bundled physician and hospital payments). Additionally, the ACA includes a reduction in the annual rate of inflation for Medicare payments to hospitals and the establishment of an independent payment advisory board to recommend ways of reducing the rate of growth in Medicare spending. Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the ACA was enacted. These changes included an aggregate reduction in Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect on April 1, 2013 and will remain in effect through 2025 unless additional Congressional action is taken. In addition, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, enacted on April 16, 2015, repealed the formula by which Medicare made annual payment adjustments to physicians and replaced the former formula with fixed annual updates and a new system of incentive payments that began in 2019, which are based on various performance measures and physicians’ participation in alternative payment models such as accountable care organizations. Individual states in the U.S. have also become increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints and discounts, and require marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures. There have also been judicial, executive branch and congressional challenges to the ACA. For example, the former U.S. President signed Executive Orders designed to delay the implementation of certain provisions of the ACA or otherwise circumvent some of the requirements for health insurance mandated by the ACA. The former U.S. administration also discontinued the payment of cost-sharing reduction payments to insurance companies in 2017, although insurers have brought judicial challenges against this decision that have been successful, in part. In addition, CMS under the former U.S. administration proposed regulations that would give states greater flexibility in setting benchmarks for insurers in the individual and small group marketplaces, which may have the effect of relaxing the essential health benefits required under the ACA for plans sold through such marketplaces. Because of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017, the ACA’s individual mandate penalty for not having health insurance coverage was repealed on January 1, 2019. Further, each chamber of Congress has put forth multiple bills designed to repeal or repeal and replace portions of the ACA. Although the majority of these measures have not been enacted by

20

​

Table of Contents

Congress to date, Congress will likely continue to consider other legislation to repeal or repeal and replace elements of the ACA, and the new U.S. administration has indicated that it will pursue additional measures to control healthcare costs. Also, in addition to other judicial challenges to the ACA, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in November 2020 on a December 2019 ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit finding the individual mandate of the ACA to be unconstitutional, and a decision is expected during the current Supreme Court term in 2021. Any regulatory or legislative developments in domestic or foreign markets that eliminate or reduce reimbursement rates for procedures performed with our products could harm our ability to sell our products or cause downward pressure on the prices of our products, either of which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our industry is the subject of numerous governmental investigations into marketing and other business practices. These investigations could result in the commencement of civil and/or criminal proceedings, substantial fines, penalties, and/or administrative remedies, divert the attention of our management, and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our industry is the subject of numerous governmental investigations into marketing and other business practices. This has included increased regulation, enforcement, inspections, and governmental investigations of the medical device industry and disclosure of financial relationships with health care professionals. In the United States, the laws in which we are subject to include:

Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available under such laws, it is possible that some of our business activities, including certain sales and marketing practices and financial arrangements with physicians, could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. Any action against us, even if we successfully defend against it, could result in the commencement of civil and/or criminal proceedings, exclusion from governmental health care programs,

21

​

Table of Contents

substantial fines, penalties, and/or administrative remedies, divert the attention of our management, and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We anticipate that the government will continue to scrutinize our industry closely, and that additional regulation by governmental authorities, both foreign and domestic, may increase compliance costs, exposure to litigation and other adverse effects to our operations.

Our products are subject to extensive regulation, which can be costly and time consuming, cause unanticipated delays, or prevent the receipt of the required approvals to commercialize products.

The pre-clinical and clinical trials of any products developed by us and the manufacturing, labeling, sale, distribution, export or import, marketing, advertising and promotion of any of those products are subject to rigorous regulation by federal, provincial, state and local governmental authorities. Our medical devices are principally regulated in the United States by the FDA, in Canada by the Health Canada (particularly, the Therapeutic Products Directorate), in the European Union by the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), and by other similar regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. Government regulation substantially increases the cost and risk of researching, developing, manufacturing and selling products. Following several widely publicized issues in recent years, the FDA and similar regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions have become increasingly focused on product safety. This development has led to, among other things, requests for more clinical trial data, for the inclusion of a significantly higher number of patients in clinical trials and for more detailed analysis of trial results. Consequently, the process of obtaining regulatory approvals, particularly from the FDA, has become more costly, time consuming and challenging than in the past. Any product developed by us or our future collaborative partners, if any, must receive all relevant regulatory approvals or clearances from the applicable regulatory authorities before it may be marketed and sold in a particular country.

Any of our products that receive regulatory approval could be subject to extensive post-market regulation that can affect sales, marketing and profitability.

With respect to any products for which we obtain regulatory approval, we will be subject to post-marketing regulatory obligations, including the requirements by the FDA, EMA and similar agencies in other jurisdictions to maintain records regarding product safety and to report to regulatory authorities serious or unexpected adverse events. The occurrence of unanticipated serious adverse events or other safety problems could cause the governing agencies to impose significant restrictions on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed, impose other restrictions on the distribution or sale of the product or require potentially costly post-approval studies. In addition, post-market discovery of previously unknown safety problems or increased severity or significance of a pre-existing safety signal could result in withdrawal of the product from the market and product recalls. Compliance with extensive post-marketing record keeping and reporting requirements requires a significant commitment of time and funds, which may limit our ability to successfully commercialize approved products.

Our industry is subject to health and safety risks.

We produce products for human implantation and use. While we take substantial precautions such as laboratory and clinical testing, clinical studies, quality control and assurance testing and controlled production methods, the associated health and safety risks cannot be eliminated. Our products may be found to be, or to contain substances that are harmful to the health of our patients and customers and which, in extreme cases, may cause serious health conditions or death. This sort of finding may expose us to substantial risk of litigation and liability.

Further, we could be forced to discontinue production of certain products, which would harm our profitability. Neovasc maintains product liability insurance coverage; however, there is no guarantee that our current coverage will be sufficient or that we can secure insurance coverage in the future at commercially viable rates or with the appropriate limits.

We may face risks associated with our manufacturing operations.

Manufacturing operations are subject to numerous unanticipated technological problems and delays. Our manufacturing processes, products and their various components are, and will be, subject to regulations specified by the various regulatory bodies such as Health Canada and the FDA. There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with all stated manufacturing regulations. Failure or delay by the Company to comply with such regulations or to satisfy regulatory inspections could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business and operations.

Additionally, two critical components of the Reducer are not readily available. The balloon portion of the delivery system is technically challenging to manufacture and the Reducer device, while a basic technology, must be manufactured in Israel due to

22

​

Table of Contents

restrictions on the transfer of intellectual property and manufacturing out of Israel stemming from certain research grants received by Neovasc Medical Ltd. prior to the acquisition in July 2008.

Use of our products may increase the risk of animal disease.

Our critical raw material used in most of our customers’ devices is animal derived pericardial tissue. As this raw material is derived from an animal, it is subject to many inconsistencies and potential risks. The most notable risk is the disease Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (“BSE”), also known as mad cow disease which can arise from bovine tissue. Although the tissue originates from the United States where strict controls are in place to prevent diseased animals from being processed, it cannot be assured that the livestock in the United States will remain free from BSE. There is also no assurance that our supplier will regularly deliver tissue with the specifications required to manufacture its products.

The manufacture of our products is highly regulated and complex and we may experience supply interruptions that could harm our ability to manufacture products.

We use a broad range of raw and organic materials and other items in the design and manufacture of our products. Our products are manufactured from treated natural animal tissue and man-made materials. Our non-implantable products are manufactured from man-made raw materials including resins, chemicals, electronics and metals. We purchase certain of the materials and components used in the manufacture of our products from external suppliers, and we purchase certain supplies from single sources for reasons of quality assurance, cost-effectiveness, availability or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements. General economic conditions could adversely affect the financial viability of our suppliers, resulting in their inability to provide materials and components used in the manufacture of our products. While we work closely with suppliers to monitor their financial viability and to assure continuity of supply and maintain high quality and reliability, these efforts may not be successful. In addition, due to the rigorous regulations and requirements of regulatory authorities regarding the manufacture of our products (including the need for approval of any change in supply arrangements), we may have difficulty establishing additional or replacement sources on a timely basis or at all if the need arises. Although alternative supplier options are considered and identified, we typically do not pursue regulatory qualification of alternative sources due to the strength of our existing supplier relationships and the time and expense associated with the regulatory validation process. A change in suppliers could require significant effort or investment in circumstances where the items supplied are integral to product performance or incorporate unique technology, and the loss of any existing supply contract could have a material adverse effect on us.

In particular, the Tiara valve is made up of two major components: the leaflets and skirt, which are made from the Peripatch and the nitinol frame, which is manufactured by a well-established specialty manufacturer in the medical device industry. However, if this supplier were unable to provide the nitinol frame in the future, it would seriously impact the further development of the Tiara.

Regulatory agencies from time to time have limited or banned the use of certain materials used in the manufacture of medical device products. In these circumstances, transition periods typically provide time to arrange for alternative materials.

We are dependent on limited products for substantially all of our current revenues. If the volume or price of these products decline or the costs of related manufacturing, distribution or marketing increase, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our securities to decline.

Sales of a limited number of our products represent substantially all of our current revenues. If the volume or pricing of our existing significant products decline in the future, or our cost to manufacture, distribute our existing significant products increase in the future, our market our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected and this could cause the market value of our securities to decline. In addition, if these products were to become subject to any other issues, such as material adverse changes in prescription growth rates, unexpected side effects, regulatory proceedings, material product liability litigation, publicity affecting doctor or patient confidence or pressure from competitive products, the adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and the market value of our securities could be significant.

We may face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates.

Our business has expanded internationally and as a result, a significant portion of our revenues, expenses, current assets and current liabilities are preliminary denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros and other foreign currencies. Up until September 30, 2017, the functional currency of Neovasc and its subsidiaries was the Canadian dollar and the presentation currency of our financial statements was U.S. dollars. A decrease in the value of such foreign currencies relative to the Canadian dollar could result in losses in revenues

23

​

Table of Contents

from currency exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not hedged against risks associated with foreign exchange rate exposure. Effective on October 1, 2017, the functional and reporting currency of Neovasc and its subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. We continue not to hedge against risks associated with foreign exchange rate exposure.

If we were to lose our foreign private issuer status under U.S. federal securities laws, we would likely incur additional expenses associated with compliance with the U.S. securities laws applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.

As a foreign private issuer, as defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are exempt from certain of the provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. For example, the U.S. proxy rules and the Section 16 reporting and “short swing” profit rules do not apply to foreign private issuers. However, if we were to lose our status as a foreign private issuer, these regulations would immediately apply and we would also be required to commence reporting on forms required of U.S. companies, such as Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, rather than the forms currently available to us, such as Forms 40-F, 20-F and 6-K. Compliance with these additional disclosure and timing requirements under these securities laws would likely result in increased expenses and would require our management to devote substantial time and resources to comply with new regulatory requirements. Further, to the extent that we were to offer or sell our securities outside of the United States, we would have to comply with the more restrictive Regulation S requirements that apply to U.S. companies, which could limit our ability to access the capital markets in the future.

There may be adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for investors if we are or become a PFIC under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Although we do not currently anticipate that we will be treated as a PFIC in the current taxable year or in the foreseeable future, the determination as to whether we are a PFIC for any taxable year is based on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations, and is not determinable until after the end of such taxable year. Further, the determination is based in part on the mix, use and value of our assets, which values may be treated as changing for U.S. federal income tax purposes as our market capitalization changes. Because of the above described uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) will not challenge the determination made by us concerning our PFIC status or that we will not be a PFIC for any taxable year. Investors should read “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” for more information, and consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules to their particular circumstances.

Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”), as well as the anti-bribery laws of the nations in which we conduct business (such as the United Kingdom’s Bribery Act or the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act of Canada (the “CFPOA”)), could subject us to penalties and other adverse consequences.

Our business is subject to the FCPA which generally prohibits companies and company employees from engaging in bribery or other prohibited payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA also requires companies to maintain accurate books and records and internal controls, including at foreign-controlled subsidiaries. In addition, we are subject to other anti-bribery laws of the nations in which we conduct business that apply similar prohibitions as the FCPA (e.g., the United Kingdom’s Bribery Act, the CFPOA and the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions). Our employees or other agents may, without our knowledge and despite our efforts, engage in prohibited conduct under our policies and procedures and the FCPA or other anti-bribery laws that we may be subject to for which we may be held responsible. If our employees or other agents are found to have engaged in such practices, we could suffer severe penalties and other consequences that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Legislative actions, potential new accounting pronouncements, and higher insurance costs are likely to impact our future financial position or results of operations.

Future changes in financial accounting standards may cause adverse, unexpected revenue fluctuations and affect our financial position or results of operations. New pronouncements and varying interpretations of pronouncements have occurred with greater frequency and are expected to occur in the future. Compliance with changing regulations of corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses. All of these uncertainties are leading generally toward increasing insurance costs, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and our ability to purchase any such insurance, at acceptable rates or at all, in the future.

24

​

Table of Contents

We are dependent upon our key personnel to achieve our business objectives.

As a technology-driven company, intellectual input from key management and personnel is critical to achieve our business objectives. Consequently, our ability to retain these individuals and attract other qualified individuals is critical to our success. The loss of the services of key individuals might significantly delay or prevent achievement of our business objectives. In addition, because of a relative scarcity of individuals with the high degree of education and scientific achievement required for our business, competition among medical device companies for qualified employees is intense and, as a result, we may not be able to attract and retain such individuals on acceptable terms, or at all. We do not maintain “key person” life insurance on any of our officers, employees, or consultants, and so any delay in replacing such persons, or an inability to replace them with persons of similar expertise, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We also have relationships with scientific collaborators at academic and other institutions, some of whom conduct research at our request or assist us in formulating our research and development strategies. These scientific collaborators are not our employees and may have commitments to, or consulting or advisory contracts with, other entities that may limit their availability to us. In addition, even though our collaborators are required to sign confidentiality agreements prior to working with us, they may have arrangements with other companies to assist such other companies in developing technologies that may prove competitive to us.

Incentive provisions for our key executives include the granting of stock options that vest over time, designed to encourage such individuals to stay with us. However, a low share price, whether as a result of disappointing progress in our sales or development programs or as a result of market conditions generally, could render such agreements of little value to our key executives. In such event, our key executives could be susceptible to being hired away by our competitors who could offer a better compensation package. If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel our business, financial conditions and results of operations may be adversely affected.

The continuing development of many of our products depends upon us maintaining strong relationships with physicians.

If we fail to maintain our working relationships with physicians, many of our products may not be developed and marketed in line with the needs and expectations of the professionals who use and support our products, which could cause a decline in our earnings and profitability. The research, development, marketing, and sales of our new and improved products is dependent upon our maintaining working relationships with physicians. We rely on these professionals to provide us with considerable knowledge and experience regarding the development, marketing, and sale of our products. Physicians assist us as researchers, marketing and product consultants, inventors, and public speakers. If we are unable to maintain our strong relationships with these professionals and continue to receive their advice and input, the development and marketing of our products could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated earnings, financial condition, and/or cash flows.

A period of significant growth or significant decline can place a strain on management systems.

If we experience a period of significant growth or decline in the number of personnel, this could place a strain upon its management systems and resources. Our future will depend in part on the ability of its officers and other key employees to implement and improve its financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures on a timely basis and to expand or contract, train and manage its employee workforce. There can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively manage such growth or contraction. Our failure to do so could have a material adverse effect upon our business, prospects, results of operation and financial condition.

Consolidation in the health care industry could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.

Many health care industry companies, including health care systems, are consolidating to create new companies with greater market power. Organizations such as group purchase organizations, independent delivery networks, and large single accounts such as the U.S. Veterans Administration, continue to consolidate purchasing decisions for many of our health care provider customers. As a result, transactions with customers are larger, more complex, and tend to involve more long-term contracts. The purchasing power of these larger customers has increased, and may continue to increase, causing downward pressure on product pricing. If we are not one of the providers selected by one of these organizations, we may be precluded from making sales to its members or participants. Even if we are one of the selected providers, we may be at a disadvantage relative to other selected providers that are able to offer volume discounts based on purchases of a broader range of medical equipment and supplies. Further, we may be required to commit to pricing that has a material adverse effect on our revenues and profit margins, business, financial condition and results of operations. We expect that market demand, governmental regulation, third-party reimbursement policies and societal pressures will continue to change the worldwide health care industry, resulting in further business consolidations and alliances, which may exert further downward pressure on the prices of our products and could adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

25

​

Table of Contents

We may or may not successfully identify and complete corporate transactions on favorable terms or achieve anticipated synergies relating to any acquisitions or alliances, and such acquisitions could result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures, require significant management resources and require significant charges.

As a part of our growth strategy, we regularly explore potential acquisitions of complementary businesses, technologies, services or products as well as potential strategic alliances or divestitures of assets or a sale of the Company. We may be unable to find suitable acquisition candidates or appropriate partners with which to form alliances. Even if we identify appropriate acquisition or alliance candidates, we may be unable to complete the acquisitions or alliances on favorable terms, if at all. Acquisition activities can be thwarted by overtures from competitors for the targeted candidates, government regulation and replacement product developments in our industry. In addition, the process of integrating an acquired business, technology, service or product into our existing operations could result in unforeseen difficulties and expenditures. Integration of an acquired company often requires significant expenditures as well as significant management resources that otherwise would be available for ongoing development of our other businesses. Moreover, we may not realize the anticipated financial or other benefits of an acquisition or alliance.

We may be required to take charges or write-downs in connection with acquisitions. In particular, acquisitions of businesses engaged in the development of new products may give rise to in-process research and development assets. To the extent that the value of these assets declines, we may be required to write down the value of the assets. Also, in connection with certain asset acquisitions, we may be required to take an immediate charge related to acquired in-process research and development. Either of these situations could result in substantial charges, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Future acquisitions could also involve the issuance of equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or amortization of expenses related to other intangible assets, any of which could adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, equity or debt financing required for such acquisitions may not be available.

Any corporate transaction will be accompanied by certain risks including but not limited to:

We may not be able to successfully overcome these risks and other problems associated with acquisitions and this may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Conflicts of interests among the Company’s officers and directors as a result of their involvement with other issuers.

Some or all of the Company’s directors and officers of the Company may act as directors and/or officers of other issuers and situations may arise where these directors and officers will be in direct competition with the Company. Conflicts, if any, will be dealt with in accordance with the relevant provisions of the CBCA. If a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the Company’s board of directors, any director in a conflict will be required to disclose their interest and abstain from voting on such matter.

Anti-takeover provisions could discourage a third party from making a takeover offer that could be beneficial to our shareholders.

Some of the provisions in our articles of incorporation and by-laws could delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us or replacing members of our board of directors, even if the acquisition or the replacements would be beneficial to our shareholders. Such provisions include the following:

26

​

Table of Contents

These provisions could also reduce the price that certain investors might be willing to pay for our securities and result in the market price for our securities, including the market price for our Common Shares, being lower than it would be without these provisions.

​

27

​

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

In late 2009, Neovasc started initial activities to develop novel technologies for the catheter-based treatment of mitral valve disease. Based on the positive results of these activities, the Company launched a program to develop the Tiara transcatheter mitral valve.

In late 2016, Neovasc sold its tissue processing technology and facility for $67,909,800 to Boston Scientific, and concurrently, Boston Scientific invested an additional $7,090,200 in Neovasc for a 15% equity interest in the Company. Under the terms of the equity investment, Boston Scientific purchased 11,817 Common Shares of Neovasc at a price of $600 per Common Share, for gross proceeds of $7,090,200. Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement, Neovasc has been granted a license to the purchased assets and access to the sold facilities to allow it to continue its tissue and valve assembly activities for its remaining customers, and continue its own tissue-related programs, including advancing the Tiara through its clinical and regulatory pathways.

Additionally, throughout the years 2014 to 2019, the Company announced a number of developments pertaining to litigation, all as more fully discussed under Item 8.A “Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information — Legal Proceedings”.

In November 2017, Neovasc completed the 2017 Financings, comprising the 2017 Public Transaction and the 2017 Private Placement, for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $65 million. The Company used the net proceeds of the 2017 Financings to fully fund the approximately $42 million balance of the damages and interest awards in its litigation with CardiAQ (after subtracting the approximately $70 million that the Company had paid into escrow), with remaining funds being used (i) to partially fund the ongoing Tiara clinical program; (ii) to support the completion of the TIARA-II study; and (iii) for general corporate purposes. No securities issued pursuant to the 2017 Financings remain outstanding as at December 31, 2021. For a description of the terms of the 2017 Financings and the securities issued pursuant to the 2017 Financings, see the prospectus supplement, dated November 10, 2017 and the forms of securities, each as filed or furnished under the Company’s profiles on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

On February 28, 2019, the Company completed the February 2019 Financing, an underwritten public offering of 1,111,111 Common Shares, at a price of $4.50 per Common Share, for gross proceeds of approximately $5 million before deducting the underwriting commission and offering expenses payable by the Company.

On March 15, 2019, the Company completed the March 2019 Financing, an underwritten public offering of 1,111,111 Common Shares, at a price of $4.50 per Common Share, for gross proceeds of approximately $5 million before deducting the underwriting commission and offering expenses payable by the Company.

On May 16, 2019, the Company completed the May 2019 Financing of (i) the 15% original issue discount 2019 Notes with a face value of $11.5 million, for gross proceeds to the Company of $9,775,000, and (ii) 334,951 Common Shares at a price of $5.15 per Common Share, for gross proceeds to the Company of $1,725,000.

On June 4, 2019, Dr. William O’Neill resigned from the board of Directors and Fred Colen was elected in his place, and on September 16, 2019, Jane Hsiao resigned from the board of Directors and Norman Radow was appointed in her place.

On January 6, 2020, the Company completed a registered direct offering of an aggregate of 1,185,000 series A units (the “Series A Units”) and 1,241,490 series B units (the “Series B Units”) at a price of US$4.135 per Series A Unit and US$4.135 per Series B Unit for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of approximately US$10 million, before deducting placement agent’s fees and estimated expenses of the Offering payable by the Company.

On August 22, 2019, the Company received written notification (the “Notification Letter”) from the Nasdaq notifying the Company that it is not in compliance with the minimum market value requirement set forth in Nasdaq Rules for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(2) requires companies to maintain a minimum market value of US$35 million and Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(C) provides that a failure to meet the market value requirement exists if the deficiency continues for a period of 30 consecutive business days. Based on the market value of the Company for the 30 consecutive business days from July 10, 2019 to August 20, 2019, the Company no longer meets the minimum market value requirement (“MVLS Requirement”). The Notification Letter did not impact the Company’s listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market at that time. In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(C), the Company was provided 180 calendar days, or until February 17, 2020, to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(2). To regain compliance, the Company’s market value must exceed US$35 million for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days.

On January 6, 2020, the Company closed its previously announced registered direct offering (the “January 2020 Financing”) priced at-the-market under Nasdaq rules of an aggregate of 1,185,000 series A units (the “Series A Units”) and 1,241,490 series B units

29

​

Table of Contents

(the “Series B Units” and together with the Series A Units, the “ January Units”) at a price of $4.135 per Series A Unit and $4.135 per Series B Unit for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $10 million, before deducting placement agent’s fees and estimated expenses of the January 2020 Financing payable by the Company.

On April 27, 2020, the Company’s application for the Paycheck Protection Program loan through the U.S. Small Business Administration was approved for approximately $530,000. This program helps businesses keep their workforce employed during the COVID-19 crisis by providing relief in the form of a forgivable loan used for payroll costs. The amount is advanced in the form of a loan that is forgivable if the borrowers, being certain wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, allocate the funds principally for the purposes of retaining employees in the U.S. through the payment of payroll and group health care benefits costs and other expenses in accordance with the loan agreement.

On April 30, 2020, the Nasdaq Hearing Panel granted the Company’s request for an extension through August 17, 2020 to evidence compliance with the $35 million MVLS Requirement for continued listing on the Nasdaq.

On May 26, 2020, the Company announced the offering of secured convertible notes (the “2020 Notes”) and warrants (the “May 2020 Warrants”), the warrant exchange transaction, repayment of the secured convertible notes of the Company issued in November 2017 (the “2017 Notes”) issued pursuant to the November 2017 private placement (the “2017 Private Placement”) and a settlement agreement between the Company and a certain investor pursuant to which the Company issued the Settlement Warrants (the “May 2020 Offering”).

On June 12, 2020, the Company announced an offering (the “June 2020 Offering”), whereby it has entered into definitive agreements with certain healthcare-focused institutional investors for the sale of an aggregate of 3,883,036 units comprised of one Common Share and three-quarters of one warrant (the “June 2020 Units”) at a purchase price of $2.973 per June 2020 Units in a registered direct offering priced at-the-market under Nasdaq rules for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $11.5 million, before deducting placement agent’s fees and estimated expenses of the June Offering payable by the Company.

On August 10, 2020, the Company announced an offering (the “August 2020 Offering”), whereby it has entered into definitive agreements with certain healthcare-focused institutional investors for the sale of an aggregate of 4,532,772 units comprised of one Common Share and three-quarters of one Warrant (the “August 2020 Units”) at a purchase price of $ 2.775 per August Unit in a registered direct offering priced at-the-market under Nasdaq rules for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $12.6 million, before deducting placement agent’s fees and estimated expenses of the August Offering payable by the Company.

On February 12, 2021, the Company announced it has closed its previously announced sale of an aggregate of 36,000,000 Common Shares at a purchase price of $2.00 per Common Share in an offering priced at-the-market under the Nasdaq rules for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $72 million, before deducting placement agent’s fees and estimated expenses of the offering payable by the Company.

The Company and its subsidiaries now operate as follows: Neovasc Inc. is the Canadian public company and 100% owner of each of the subsidiary entities. NMI and NUS are the operating companies for the group. They hold the majority of the tangible assets and NMI holds the Peripatch tissue license. NMI and NUS employ the majority of the employees of the Company. NTI holds all the intangible assets related to the Tiara and NML holds all the intangible assets related to the Reducer program. NMI charges both NTI and NML for the development services performed by its employees to develop the Tiara and the Reducer respectively. NML receives a royalty based on the Reducer revenues generated by NMI. NUS charges NMI for development services performed by its employees to develop the Tiara and the Reducer respectively and these are then passed on through NMI to NTI and NML respectively. Neovasc GmbH conducts sales and marketing activities on behalf of NMI as part of the license agreement between NML and NMI for NMI to manufacture, distribute and sell the Reducer on behalf of NML. Neovasc Management Inc provides executive management services to Neovasc Inc.

B.Business Overview

Introduction

Neovasc is a specialty medical device company that develops, manufactures and markets products for the rapidly growing cardiovascular marketplace. Its products include the Neovasc Reducer^TM (the “Reducer”), for the treatment of refractory angina, which is currently under clinical investigation in the United States and has been commercially available in Europe since 2015, and the Tiara^TM

30

​

Table of Contents

(the “Tiara”), for the transcatheter treatment of mitral valve disease, which is currently under clinical investigation in the United States, Canada, Israel and Europe.

In 2009, Neovasc started initial activities to develop novel technologies for catheter-based treatment of mitral valve disease. Based on the early positive results of these activities, the Company formally launched a program to develop the Tiara. Neovasc established a separate entity, NTI, in March 2013 to develop and own the intellectual property related to the Tiara (Neovasc has transferred all intellectual property related to Tiara to NTI). On February 3, 2014, Neovasc announced the first human implant of the Tiara under special access compassionate use exemptions. Subsequently additional patients have been treated with the Tiara bringing the total number of patients treated with the device to 83 through April 25, 2021. In December 2014, the Company announced that it had received approval from the FDA to initiate the TIARA-I study in the United States. The TIARA-I study is a multinational, multicenter early feasibility study being conducted to assess the safety and performance of the Tiara valve system in high risk surgical patients. The study includes 27 patients enrolled at centers in the United States, Canada and Belgium. We received approval from the FDA to close enrollment in the TIARA-I study in the United States on November 15, 2019. On November 28, 2016, the Company announced that it had received both regulatory and ethics committee approval to initiate the TIARA-II in Italy. The TIARA-II study has since expanded through the opening of clinical sites in Germany, Israel, Spain and the United Kingdom. The TIARA-II study is a 115 patient, non-randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating the Tiara’s safety and performance. It is expected that data from this study will be used to file for CE Mark approval which would enable Neovasc to market the device in Europe.

In July 2008, Neovasc acquired NML, a pre-commercial vascular device company based in Israel. NML developed and owned intellectual property related to a novel catheter-based treatment for refractory angina, a debilitating condition resulting from inadequate blood flow to the heart muscle. Refractory angina, resulting in continuing symptoms despite maximal medical therapy and without further revascularization options, is estimated to affect 600,000 to 1.8 million Americans, with 50,000 to 100,000 new cases per year. A publication in the Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine Journal by Benck and Henry suggests that the prevalence of No-Option Refractory Disabling Angina (NORDA) in the U.S. population is between 26,000 and 52,000. In another publication in the European Heart Journal by Crea et al., stated persistence of angina caused by incomplete coronary revascularization may occur in up to 30% in the current era, although definitions of incomplete revascularization are heterogeneous. It further stated that persistent angina is associated with a significant economic burden with healthcare costs almost being two-fold higher among patients with persistent angina post-percutaneous coronary intervention vs. those who become symptom free. The Company completed development of the Reducer and obtained authorization to affix the CE Mark, which allows for marketing of the Reducer product in the European marketplace. The Company initiated commercial sales of the Reducer product in early-2015. In March 2014, the Company announced that results of its COSIRA clinical trial had been presented at the ACC.14 medical conference. The COSIRA trial was a sham-controlled randomized, double-blinded study of the Reducer device in 104 patients with moderate to severe refractory angina. The results presented at ACC.14 confirmed that the COSIRA study had met its primary endpoint demonstrating the efficacy of the Reducer device with statistical significance. The COSIRA trial results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine in February 2015.

In 2016, Neovasc initiated the REDUCER-I observational study as a multi-center, multi-country, three-arm study collecting long-term data from European patients implanted with the Reducer. The study is expected to enroll up to 400 patients. Currently, 330 patients have been enrolled across 24 centers that are active in Italy, Germany, Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain and Switzerland. In February 2018, the Reducer reached NUB 1 status in Germany, the highest level for important new therapies. NUB 1 status was renewed in January 2019 and again in January 2020. In 2020, more German clinics will continue to negotiate and finalize these reimbursement negotiations.

In October 2018, the Company announced that the FDA designated the Reducer as a Breakthrough Device. In December 2018, the Company filed a Q-Sub submission to the FDA containing a comprehensive overview of all available Reducer Clinical data, real world performance data and a risk/benefit analysis for patients with refractory angina requesting an FDA Sprint discussion meeting. The Sprint discussion occurred during January 2019. On February 20, 2019 the Company announced that the FDA had informed Neovasc that, despite “Breakthrough Device Designation”, the FDA review team recommends collection of further pre-market blinded data prior to PMA submission. Through the Sprint discussion process, Neovasc will continue discussions with the FDA and their senior management to attempt to bring this promising refractory angina device therapy to U.S. patients as soon as possible. Following the Sprint discussion held with the FDA on October 9, 2019 and weighing all available options a decision was made by the Company to pursue a PMA application for this Breakthrough medical device. On December 31, 2019, the Company announced the submission of a PMA to the FDA for the Reducer. On October 27, 2020, the FDA Circulatory Systems Devices Panel Meeting was held. The Panel voted 14 to 4 “in favor” that the Neovasc Reducer™ is safe when used as intended and voted 1 to 17 “against” on the issue of a reasonable assurance of effectiveness. The third vote was 13 to 3 “against” (2 abstained) on whether the relative benefits outweighed the relative risks. On January 15, 2021, the Company announced that it had received a not-approvable letter from FDA regarding its PMA submission for the Reducer.

31

​

Table of Contents

Neovasc’s business operations started in March 2002, with the acquisition of NMI. NMI manufactured a line of collagen-based surgical patch products made for use in cardiac reconstruction and vascular repair procedures as well as other surgeries. Neovasc, through NMI, also sold biological tissue to industry partners and other customers who incorporated this tissue into their own products such as transcatheter heart valves. Neovasc’s biological products were made from chemically treated biocompatible pericardial tissue. In 2012, Neovasc sold the rights to manufacture a specific line of conventional surgical patch products to LeMaitre for $4.6 million but retained rights to the underlying tissue technology for all other uses. On December 2, 2016, the Company and Boston Scientific entered into a definitive agreement for Boston Scientific Corporation to acquire Neovasc’s advanced biologic tissue capabilities and certain manufacturing assets and make a 15% equity investment in Neovasc, for a total of $75 million in cash. Neovasc retained a license for its own Tiara products but ceased operations of its consulting services and contract manufacturing revenue line items in 2017.

Neovasc’s Strategy

The Company’s core strategy is to (i) expand revenue and global reimbursement for Reducer and conduct a U.S. IDE Study and (ii) advance the development program for the Tiara TA transapical system. The Company is focused on providing minimally invasive medical devices (including Reducer and Tiara) for a cardiovascular market that the Company believes is both growing and under-served by current treatment solutions.

Key elements of this strategy include:

Neovasc’s Products

Tiara

In 2009, Neovasc started initial activities to develop novel technologies for catheter-based treatment of mitral valve disease. In the second quarter of 2011, the Company formally initiated a new project to develop the Tiara, a product for treating mitral valve disease. The transapically delivered Tiara is currently in the clinical trial phase providing a minimally invasive transcatheter device for patients who experience severe Mitral Regurgitation as a result of functional (most patients) or degenerative mitral heart valve disease, combined with an enlarged left ventricle. There are millions of patients worldwide who suffer from severe Mitral regurgitation, the majority of them with functional Mitral Regurgitation. Mitral Regurgitation is often severe and can lead to heart failure and death. Currently, a significant percentage of patients with severe Mitral Regurgitation are not good candidates for conventional surgical repair or replacement due to frailty or comorbidities. Many of these patients are treated today via minimally invasive mitral valve repair procedures; however, these procedures are also complex, can take a long period of time to complete, and the clinical outcomes may not be optimal. Currently there is no transcatheter mitral valve replacement device approved for use in the U.S.

Our two sizes, the 35mm and 40mm allow for the treatment of approximately 75% of the annulus sizes in this high-risk patient population, in our TIARA-I and TIARA-II Clinical Studies, but other anatomical and clinical factors may influence applicability of the devices in patients. Currently, approximately 20% of this high-risk patient population meet all inclusion criteria for the Tiara studies and can be treated.

As of March 8, 2022, 83 patients have been treated with Tiara in either the TIARA-I Early Feasibility Clinical Study, compassionate use cases or in our TIARA-II CE Mark Clinical Study. Neovasc believes that early results have been encouraging. The 30-day survival rate at the time of data cut-off on April 15, 2021, for the 83 patients treated with the Tiara is 89% with one patient now now more than 7 years post implant. The Tiara has successfully treated both functional and degenerative Mitral Regurgitation patients,

32

​

Table of Contents

as well as patients with pre-existing prosthetic aortic valves and mitral surgical annuloplasty rings. On November 15, 2019, TIARA-I study enrollment was closed with 27 patients treated. This decision was not due to any safety concerns. The objective of the TIARA-I Early Feasibility study was to demonstrate the safety of the Neovasc TMVR system, while gathering preliminary information on device performance and clinical outcomes. With the experience to date, the Company believes it has accomplished this objective. The patients that are in follow-up will continue their follow up assessments, adverse event reporting requirements, etc. as per protocol through their 5-year visits. This decision had no impact on the TIARA-II CE Mark Study. There are currently 16 active sites across Germany, Israel, Spain, the Netherlands and the UK. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, enrollment continues to be on temporary hold (sites were notified on April 24, 2020 of the temporary hold). The results from our clinical experience to-date continues to demonstrate the potential benefit for patients who otherwise have no treatment options.

Neovasc believes that there are several unique attributes of the Tiara that may provide advantages over other approaches to mitral valve replacement, in particular the combination of its low profile, its D shape, enabling a better anatomical fit and less risk of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and its unique combined skirt and anchoring mechanism. The Tiara has successfully treated 17 patients with previous aortic valves (AVR), including mechanical, bioprosthetic and TAVI, without any LVOT obstruction, no peri-procedural deaths or paravalvular leak. Data on the first 12 patients with previous AVR treated with Tiara was published in 2018 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions.

There are several other transcatheter mitral valve replacement devices in development by third-parties, some of which have been implanted in early feasibility type studies, pivotal U.S. studies, and CE Mark studies with varying results. There is no certainty that the Tiara will successfully proceed through clinical evaluation and ultimately receive regulatory approval to treat these patients.

The Tiara valve is manufactured, packaged and labelled in-house by the Company and is made up of two major components: the leaflets which are made from the Peripatch bovine tissue licensed from Boston Scientific, a fabric skirt, and the nitinol frame (to which the leaflets and skirt are attached), which is manufactured by a well-established specialty manufacturer in the medical device industry. If this supplier were unable to provide the nitinol frame in the future, it would seriously impact further development of the Tiara. The Tiara delivery system is manufactured, packaged and labelled in-house by the Company using customized standard catheter construction components that are readily available through vendors.

The TIARA-II study is estimated to cost approximately $15 million and many challenges remain prior to achieving commercialization (including, but not limited to, positive clinical trial results and obtaining regulatory approval from the relevant authorities).  The Company is managing and conducting the TIARA-II study itself in conjunction with certain service providers who undertake portions of data collection, data management, data analysis, safety and event monitoring and similar functions. The Tiara is currently manufactured for use in these studies by Neovasc at its own facilities following required medical device quality requirements. In the event of a positive outcome from the TIARA-II study and the Company successfully obtaining CE Mark approval, and if the Company decides to commercialize the Tiara TA, the Tiara would be commercially manufactured in the same manner at Neovasc’s facility.

Regulatory Status

The Company filed for CE Mark under MDD but was unable to complete the regulatory review process before the expiration of the MDD on May 26, 2021. Therefore, the Company was unable to receive CE Mark under MDD in the first half of 2021. The Company is in ongoing discussions with its notified body and is pursuing a regulatory decision under MDR rules. There is no assurance that European regulatory filing and an approval will be granted in the time frame anticipated by management or granted at any time in the future or that any or all of the sizes will be approved. There is no expectation that this product will be revenue-generating in the near term. The Tiara TA is an early-stage development product without any regulatory approvals in any country. The Company expects ongoing expenses associated with Tiara TA regulatory, clinical and other functional activities.

The Company has indefinitely paused development activity associated with Tiara TF. There can be no assurance that the Company will re-start development activity with Tiara TF or that it will maintain the development pause.

Reducer

The Reducer is a treatment for patients with refractory angina, a painful and debilitating condition that occurs when the coronary vasculature delivers an inadequate supply of blood to the heart muscle, despite treatment with standard revascularization or cardiac drug therapies.

33

​

Table of Contents

Worldwide, coronary artery disease (“CAD”) is the leading cause of death. It is the largest contributor to the global burden of disease as reflected in disability-adjusted life years, a measure which combines premature mortality and the prevalence and severity of ill-health. On this measure, the impact of CAD increased by 29% in the period from 1990 to 2010. This reflects the worldwide shift to those chronic diseases associated with an aging global population. The most frequent (and often the first) manifestation of stable CAD is chronic stable angina. As a result, angina is a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide. There is a clear association between more frequent angina and greater utilization of healthcare resources.

Refractory angina, resulting in continued symptoms despite maximal medical therapy without revascularization options, is estimated to affect 600,000 to 1.8 million Americans, with 50,000 to 100,000 new cases per year. A publication in the Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine Journal by Benck and Henry suggests that the prevalence of No-Option Refractory Disabling Angina (NORDA) in the U.S. population is between 26,000 and 52,000. Another publication in the European Heart Journal by Crea et al., stated persistence of angina caused by incomplete coronary revascularization may occur in up to 30% in the current era, although definitions of incomplete revascularization are heterogeneous. It further stated that persistent angina is associated with a significant economic burden with healthcare costs almost being two-fold higher among patients with persistent angina post-percutaneous coronary intervention vs. those who become symptom free. Additionally, there is emerging interest in treating patients that have refractory angina despite patent coronary arteries. Angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease may affect as many as 39% of patients with chest pain according to a study from Patel et. al, published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Furthermore, a publication in Circulation by Lee et. al. suggests upwards of 20% of patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease have evidence of microvascular dysfunction. Increasing interest in diagnosis and treatment of angina and microvascular dysfunction as evidenced by the 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes provides growing support for Reducer treatment.

The pain and shortness of breath associated with refractory angina can make it difficult for patients to engage in routine activities, such as walking or climbing stairs. Clinical studies demonstrate that the Reducer can provide significant relief of chest pain, shortness of breath and other debilitating symptoms in refractory angina patients. A significant proportion of the refractory angina patients in the United States and in Europe are potential candidates for the current Reducer therapy, either because they cannot be revascularized or because they are otherwise poorly managed using conventional medical therapies. These patients represent a substantial potential market opportunity for the Reducer. There continues to be interest from the medical community to explore the use of Reducer for other indications. Further clinical trials will need to be conducted to explore this possibility.

The Reducer is targeting a patient population that has failed to gain relief of their symptoms, despite other medical treatment options. A refractory patient, by definition, is resistant to other existing interventional cardiology therapies and is not receiving adequate relief from available drug regimens to manage their chest pain, shortness of breath and other debilitating symptoms. Neovasc believes that further studies may demonstrate that additional patient populations may benefit from treatment with Reducer and thus could further increase its market potential.

The Reducer is an hourglass-shaped, balloon-expandable, stainless steel, bare metal device, which is implanted in the coronary sinus, creating a restriction in venous outflow from the myocardium (the muscular layer of the heart wall). It is implanted using conventional percutaneous, or needle puncture, techniques. The Reducer is provided sterile, pre-loaded on a balloon catheter compatible with a 9 French delivery sheath and operates over a 0.035 inch guidewire. The implant procedure requires minimal training for experienced interventionalists.

Using a catheter-based procedure, the Reducer is implanted in the coronary sinus (the main vein draining blood from the heart muscle). Following implantation, the Reducer (all but the mid-section) becomes covered with endothelial tissue after about 4-6 weeks. This tissue coverage creates a permanent (but reversible, if necessary) narrowing in the coronary sinus. The coronary sinus is narrowed from a typical diameter of 10-12mm to approximately 3mm at the site of implantation. This focal narrowing provides a backwards pressure elevation in the coronary sinus which is intended to improve blood perfusion to ischemic territories of the heart muscle by redistributing blood from the less ischemic areas to the more ischemic areas of the heart muscle. This can result in improved perfusion of the endocardium, which helps relieve ischemia and chest pain, shortness of breath and other debilitating symptoms.

The clinical utility of this approach was demonstrated by a number of analogous approaches used in the past that achieved positive clinical outcomes for angina patients by constricting or intermittently blocking the coronary sinus to improve perfusion to the heart muscle. However, these approaches required either the use of highly invasive surgery or leaving a catheter in the heart for a prolonged period, making them impractical or clinically unacceptable for use in modern medical practice. The Reducer was developed to deliver this coronary sinus reduction therapy in a safe, simple and effective manner via a minimally invasive catheter that is consistent with contemporary medical practice.

34

​

Table of Contents

The Reducer’s first demonstration of excellent results was in multiple animal studies and a first-in-human clinical trial in which 15 patients suffering from chronic refractory angina were followed out to six months, and then again at three years post implantation. The six-month results from this clinical trial were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology and three-year follow-up data were presented at the annual scientific meeting of the American College of Cardiology in March 2010. In this clinical trial, implantation of the Reducer resulted in significant clinical improvements in stress test and perfusion measurements, as well as in overall quality of life in the majority of the patients at six months and these same results were noted at the three year follow up. During this period, the Reducer remained patent with no evidence of migration, and symptom relief was maintained in these patients.

The Company executed the COSIRA trial, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Reducer device in 2013. The COSIRA trial’s primary endpoint was a two-class improvement in angina symptoms six months after implantation based on the patients’ ratings on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society “CCS” angina grading scale; a four-class functional classification that is widely used to characterize the severity of angina symptoms and disability. Only patients with severe angina, CCS Class III or IV, were enrolled in the COSIRA trial. The trial analysis showed that the study met the primary endpoint, with patients receiving the Reducer achieving a statistically significant improvement in CCS scores (two classes or better) compared to patients receiving a sham control (18 of 52 [34.6%] of the Reducer patients improved ≥ 2 CCS classes compared to 8 of 52 [15.4%] of the control patients [p-value = 0.024]). The analysis also showed that patients treated with the Reducer showed a statistically significant improvement of one or more CCS classes compared to the sham control patients (37 of 52 [71.2%] of the Reducer patients showed this improvement compared to 22 of 52 [42.3%] of the control patients [p-value = 0.003]). The COSIRA trial results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine in February 2015.

In 2016, Neovasc initiated the REDUCER-I post market observational study as a multi-center, multi-country, three-arm study collecting long-term data from European patients implanted with the Reducer. The study is expected to enroll up to 400 patients. Currently, 330  patients have been enrolled across 24 centers that are active in Italy, Germany, Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain and Switzerland. Enrollment has been delayed due to the impact of COVID-19.

In 2018 an article by Parikh, et al., was published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) titled, “First-in-Human Use of Coronary Sinus Reducer in Patients with Refractory Angina”. This article describes the long-term structural, anatomic, and clinical durability of the Reducer. Reducers were patent 12 years following implantation, with no signs of strut fractures, dislocation, thrombosis, or migration, and the sustained improvement in angina class seen at six months and three years was also maintained at the 12-year follow-up.

Hundreds of patients have been enrolled in clinical studies conducted by third parties across Europe and Israel relating to the Reducer. These studies continue to show a strong safety profile and positive clinical results that trend closely to the COSIRA randomized study. Many of these studies have been published and presented in medical forums. It is anticipated that as the commercial use of the Reducer continues to expand, additional third-party studies, investigations and presentations will be undertaken. If the results from such third-party activities continue to show positive results from the product, they may provide additional data to support expanded adoption of the Reducer for the intended patient population. As a result of the clinical evidence from these studies and publications, the Reducer Therapy has now been recognized in the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines as a treatment option for refractory angina.

Included in the numerous publications of clinical results since the COSIRA study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2015, a publication in the European Heart Journal by Gallone, et al., on the “Cost-effectiveness of the coronary sinus Reducer and its impact on the healthcare burden of refractory angina” indicated that the Reducer was consistently cost-effective according to a range of cost-effectiveness thresholds after just one year of implant.

Following the positive data from the COSIRA trial, the Company initiated a pilot launch of the Reducer in select European markets in early 2015. The Company has signed distribution agreements in multiple jurisdictions across Europe. Direct sales are underway in select centers in Germany.

Based on achieving NUB 1 status in Germany and a general positive reception in the European market, with positive experiences by many physicians from the treatment of their own patients with the Reducer, we are seeing an increase in adoption of the Reducer therapy in Europe. COVID-19 had a marked impact on Reducer revenues and we anticipate that the negative impact will be felt again in 2022. It is unclear how long the negative impact of COVID-19 will persist.

We are seeing a growing level of enthusiasm in Europe for the Reducer therapy and we believe that the therapy has significant potential. In order to further accelerate the penetration of the therapy, we are open to considering strategic alternatives for the Reducer, including potential alliances in Europe, and the rest of the world.

35

​

Table of Contents

On May 6, 2019, the Company announced that 1,000 patients diagnosed with refractory angina have been treated with the Reducer. The Reducer therapy now benefits from medical evidence spanning 1,000 patients and 14 years of follow up.

On September 3, 2019, the Company announced that the European Society of Cardiology included Neovasc Reducer in the European Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes. The Reducer entered at Class 2 B.

On November 1, 2019, the Company announced it had advised the FDA of its decision to submit a PMA application, and on December 31, 2019, the Company announced the submission of a PMA to the FDA for the Reducer.

On July 9, 2020, the Company announced it had received notification of an FDA Circulatory Systems Devices Panel Meeting scheduled for October 27, 2020.

On October 28, 2020, the Company announced results from the FDA Circulatory Systems Devices Panel Meeting at which the Panel voted 14 to 4 “in favor” that the Reducer is safe when used as intended and voted 1 to 17 "against" on the issue of a reasonable assurance of effectiveness. The third vote was 13 to 3 "against” (2 abstained) on whether the relative benefits outweighed the relative risks. As a result, on January 15, 2021, the Company announced that it had received a not-approvable letter from FDA regarding its PMA submission for the Neovasc Reducer.

On September 16, 2021, the Company received FDA approval for the Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) regarding the COSIRA-II IDE Clinical Trial. Following multiple discussions with FDA, the approved protocol for the COSIRA-II study is designed to answer key questions arising from the October 2020 Circulatory Systems Devices Panel Meeting regarding the Reducer.

On January 5, 2022, the Company announced first patient enrollment in the COSIRA-II trial.  The Company is focused on activating centers and enrolling in the study.

Regulatory Status

The Reducer received CE Mark designation in November 2011. On November 3, 2017, Neovasc received FDA approval for a U.S. IDE clinical trial, COSIRA-II (a trial design similar to the COSIRA study). While the principal investigator and co-principal investigator for this study were already appointed, the Company did not initiate the U.S. clinical trial at that time, funding being the largest impediment. The cost of this U.S. clinical trial is expected to be approximately $35 million. The Company expects significant future expenses associated with the clinical studies, and regulatory submissions, for the Reducer. The September 15, 2021 IDE Supplement approval provided FDA approval for an updated protocol for the COSIRA-II Study, which has begun enrollment in the United States.

On October 10, 2018, the Company announced that the FDA had granted “Breakthrough Device Designation” for the Reducer. The FDA grants this designation in order to expedite the development and review of a device that demonstrates compelling potential to provide a more effective treatment or diagnosis for life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating diseases.

On December 20, 2018, Neovasc filed a comprehensive Q-Sub submission to the FDA with all available Reducer Clinical evidence, requesting a Sprint FDA discussion meeting. The Neovasc team, together with two top U.S. Cardiologists, met with the FDA proposing moving forward with a PMA submission using the available Neovasc clinical evidence including the prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study assessing the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in 104 patients in the European Union and Canada (COSIRA), a multi-center, multi-country, three-arm observational post market study (REDUCER-I), and supportive safety and efficacy data from peer-reviewed journals.

On February 20, 2019 the Company announced that the FDA had informed Neovasc that, despite “Breakthrough Device Designation”, the FDA review team recommended collection of further pre-market blinded data prior to PMA submission.

On June 26, 2019, the Company and two top U.S. Cardiologists, met with FDA to further discuss available clinical evidence for the Reducer, to try to reach agreement on potential options to enter the U.S. Market. FDA provided the Company with guidance towards potential alternate options, including the HDE pathway for class IV refractory angina patients and/or alternate clinical trial designs for a broader refractory angina patient population.

Following the Sprint discussion held with the FDA on October 9, 2019 and weighing all available options a decision was made by the Company to pursue a PMA application for this Breakthrough medical device.

36

​

Table of Contents

On October 27, 2020, the FDA Circulatory Systems Devices Panel Meeting was held. The Panel voted 14 to 4 “in favor” that the Neovasc Reducer™ is safe when used as intended and voted 1 to 17 “against” on the issue of a reasonable assurance of effectiveness. The third vote was 13 to 3 “against” (2 abstained) on whether the relative benefits outweighed the relative risks. As a result, on January 15, 2021, the Company received a “not-approvable” letter from the FDA regarding its PMA submission for the Reducer.

On September 16, 2021, the Company received FDA approval for the Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) regarding the COSIRA-II IDE Clinical Trial. Following multiple discussions with FDA, the approved protocol for the COSIRA-II study is designed to answer key questions arising from the October 2020 Circulatory Systems Devices Panel Meeting regarding the Reducer. On January 5, 2022, the Company announced enrollment of the first patient in the COSIRA-II clinical trial.

New Products/Components/Cycles

Tiara

The Company has indefinitely paused development activity associated with Tiara TF. There can be no assurance that the Company will re-start development activity with Tiara TF or that it will maintain the development pause.

Reducer

The Reducer is a commercial-stage product with European CE Mark approval. The Company initiated a pilot launch of the Reducer in select European markets in 2015. The Company has also initiated Reducer sales in other non-U.S. markets with distribution agreements in several countries.

A well-known and well-established medical device contract manufacturer is manufacturing the Reducer for the Company and we are in the process of transitioning manufacture of the device to another similar contract manufacturer. The majority of the components that make up the Reducer are readily available; however, two critical components of the device are not. The balloon portion of the delivery system is technically challenging to manufacture and the Reducer device, while a basic technology, must be manufactured in Israel due to restrictions on the transfer of intellectual property and manufacturing out of Israel stemming from certain research grants received by NML prior to the acquisition in July 2008.

Peripatch Technology used in our Tiara Mitral Valve

The basic Peripatch technology licensed from Boston Scientific was established over 25 years ago, when the material was used to fashion the leaflets and other components in surgical heart valves.

Neovasc sources its bovine tissue from abattoirs in New Zealand for the manufacture of Tiara devices. There is a degree of capacity constraint related to the supply of raw tissue but the risk of disruption is minimal, due to the relatively small amounts of tissue required for the current Tiara programs.

While a definitive pattern of demand has not yet been established and the effect is expected to be minimal, the cyclical nature of the meat industry could conceivably have an impact on the quality and availability of raw tissue and could potentially impact the yields and margins for the product over the course of any given year. Further information about Peripatch can be found above under the heading “Neovasc’s Products”.

37

​

Table of Contents

Marketing

The Company markets the Reducer through direct sales in Germany and France and through distributors for other countries in Europe, the Middle East and Australia. The Company has signed distribution agreements in a number of European countries as well as Saudi Arabia, Israel and Australia, and has ongoing Reducer sales activities in these countries. In 2022, Neovasc’s marketing plan is to focus its sales activities on Germany, after retaining NUB 1 status in that country, and France, after obtaining transitional French reimbursement, as well as on further penetration of markets where the Company already has a sales presence with distributors. The Company is unable to initiate marketing activities in the United States until receiving U.S. regulatory approval, if such approval is granted. As the Company continues to receive favorable reimbursement in markets including, Germany, France and the United Kingdom, it expects to expand its direct sales presence in those markets.

Economic Dependence

Our success and competitive position are dependent in part upon our proprietary intellectual property. We rely on a combination of patents and trade secrets to protect our proprietary intellectual property, and we expect to continue to do so.

Commercial Contracts

For the year ended December 31, 2021, revenues from the Company’s three largest customers accounted for approximately 15%, 11% and 5% of the Company’s sales. These customers are typically established medical device distributors who distribute Reducer within a broader portfolio of third party products.

Intellectual Property Strategy

Both Neovasc and the broader medical device industry attach significant importance to patents for the protection of new technologies, products and processes. Accordingly, Neovasc’s success depends, in part, on its ability to obtain patents or rights thereto, to protect commercial secrets and carry on activities without infringing the rights of third parties. See “Risk Factors” in Item 3.D and “Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information — Legal Proceedings” in Item 8.A elsewhere in this Annual Report for a description of certain pending, ongoing or potential future legal proceedings and risks relating thereto. Where appropriate, and consistent with management’s objectives, patents are pursued once concepts have been validated through appropriate laboratory work. To that end, Neovasc will continue to seek patents in relation to those components or concepts that it perceives to be important.

Neovasc has patents and patent applications with respect to its technology. The specific active patent applications and granted patents to which Neovasc has rights are listed below, along with notes relating to the countries in which the patent applications have been filed and the expected expiration dates of such patent applications.

38

​

Table of Contents

39

​

Table of Contents