UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.       )

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐

Preliminary Proxy Statement

​

☐

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

​

☒

Definitive Proxy Statement

​

☐

Definitive Additional Materials

​

☐

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

​

Lucid Group, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒

No fee required.

​

☐

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

​

☐

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a6(i)(1) and 0-11

​

■

Also in July, we appointed four new Board members, bringing the total to nine, eight of whom are independent. These members augment a Board of seasoned, accomplished, and respected leaders who bring a wide and diverse range of experiences.

​

■

In September 2021, the EPA released its official range estimate for the Lucid Air Dream Edition and Lucid Air Grand Touring, certifying that versions of each vehicle have range in excess of 500 miles per charge and that the Dream Edition Range has the longest range for any electric car ever rated by the EPA at 520 miles on a single charge — more than 100 miles over its closest competitor.

​

■

Also in September, the first customer-quality Lucid Air luxury electric sedans began rolling off the assembly line of our Case Grande, Arizona factory — the very first greenfield dedicated EV factory in North America. We also announced plans to quadruple its size with an additional 2.85 million square feet in 2023.

​

■

In October 2021, we began delivering the very first Lucid Air Dream Edition models to the delight of our first customers in North America.

​

■

In November 2021, we were honored to be awarded the 2022 MotorTrend Car of the Year, the most prestigious award in the automotive industry, for Lucid Air — our very first car — and a resounding endorsement of our ability to deliver the most advanced electric vehicles in the world.

​

■

In December 2021, we became a part of the prestigious Nasdaq 100 Index and raised an additional $2 billion in convertible green bonds.

​

In fiscal year 2021, we continued to attract talent and expand our talent pool, growing our employee base from about 1,600 to about 3,900. To date, we have also opened 24 Studio and Service locations in North America, further expanding our direct-to-consumer studio network, delivering a world class customer experience and attracting new customers to the brand.

And It’s Just the Beginning

Whilst I am heartened by what we have achieved to date, in many ways this is just the beginning. We continue to expand our world-class team of people that are dedicated to our mission of making the planet a better place.

We remain intently focused on ramping production to deliver vehicles to our patient and loyal customers and are very excited about our product roadmap in 2022 and beyond. We are delivering Lucid Air Grand Touring models today, and we expect to begin customer deliveries of Lucid Air Touring and Pure models later this year. We also have plans to introduce our Gravity SUV model in 2024, with much more to follow. Later this year, we will expand our global presence for sales and service into Europe and the Middle East while laying the foundation for Asia Pacific markets in 2023.

The Phase 2 expansion of our factory in Casa Grande, Arizona — the first greenfield EV factory in North America — is already underway. When completed in 2023, this expansion is expected to add 2.85 million square feet to the existing AMP-1 factory, allowing us to bring production of advanced EV powertrain, battery packs and assembly of vehicles all under one roof. We have also announced plans to build a brand-new manufacturing facility in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

We are not immune to the challenging global environment that has impacted parts of our supply chain and logistics, but our team continues to work

hard to mitigate these risks. We have a strong team, strong products, and a strong balance sheet with over $6.2 billion in cash on hand at the end of 2021, and we continue to invest in our business, our products and our people. We are on the precipice of a global transition toward electric vehicles. With our leading technology and design, Lucid is at the forefront of one of the most significant transformations of our time.

I want to thank you for joining us on this journey to a sustainable future, and we truly appreciate your support of our company and our mission. We are dedicated to continuing to deliver on our ESG mission, making additional progress on advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion in our employee base, and further enhancing stockholder value. We will continue to strive to invest time with you, our stockholders, to better understand your perspectives. Together we can make a difference in the world, for ourselves, and for future generations to come.

Sincerely,

Peter Rawlinson
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Technology Officer

Lucid Group, Inc.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to Be Held on June 9, 2022

April 28, 2022​

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Lucid Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“we,” “us,” “Lucid Group,” “Lucid” or the “Company”). The Annual Meeting will be held virtually on June 9, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. (Pacific Time), to consider and vote on the following proposals:

1.

To elect the nine nominees to serve as directors until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, subject to earlier resignation or removal;

​

2.

To ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022;

​

3.

To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation for our named executive officers;

​

4.

To approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers;

​

5.

To approve the amendment of the Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan; and

​

6.

To conduct such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

​

These items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”).

The record date for the Annual Meeting is April 12, 2022 (the “Record Date”). Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date may vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting remotely by registering at www.proxdocs.com/LCID. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including a unique link that will allow you access to the Annual Meeting and to vote and submit questions. As part of the registration process, you must enter the control number located on your proxy card, voting instruction form, or Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be held on

June 9, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. (Pacific Time)

via the internet at www.proxydocs.com/LCID

The Proxy Statement and annual report to stockholders are available at: www.proxydocs.com/LCID

In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, for the safety of all involved persons, including our directors, employees and stockholders, and taking into account recent federal, state and local guidance that has been issued, we have determined that the 2022 Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only, via the internet, with no physical in-person meeting. If you plan to participate in the virtual meeting, please see the Questions and Answers section below. Stockholders will be able to attend, vote and submit questions (both before, and for a portion of, the meeting) via the internet

In the event of an adjournment, postponement or emergency that may change the Annual Meeting’s time or date, we will make an announcement, issue a press release or post information at www.lucidmotors.com to notify stockholders, as appropriate. If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your shares, please write to Lucid Investor Relations at 7373 Gateway Boulevard, Newark, CA 94560 or by email at investor@lucidmotors.com.

By Order of the Board of Directors
Jonathan Butler
General Counsel & Secretary
Newark, California

​

 ​

Lucid Group, Inc.
7373 Gateway Boulevard
Newark, CA 94560

 ​

About Lucid

Business Combination Background

On July 23, 2021 (the “Closing Date”), our predecessor company, Atieva, Inc. (“Atieva” or “Legacy Lucid”) consummated a merger (the “Merger”) with Churchill Capital Corp IV (“Churchill”), a special-purpose acquisition company, pursuant to a Merger Agreement by and among Churchill, Legacy Lucid and Air Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub”) (the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into Legacy Lucid, with Legacy Lucid the surviving company in the Merger. At the closing of the Merger (the “Closing”), Churchill changed its name to Lucid Group, Inc.

At the Closing, all shares of Legacy Lucid capital stock then issued and outstanding were automatically cancelled in exchange for 1,193,226,511 shares of Lucid’s Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”). In addition, at the Closing, Lucid issued 166,666,667 shares of Common Stock to certain investors (the “PIPE Investors”), including Ayar Third Investment Company (“Ayar”), Legacy Lucid’s majority shareholder, for a purchase price of  $15.00 per share, pursuant to common stock subscription agreements entered into between Churchill and the PIPE Investors in February 2021. Ayar purchased 13,333,333 of these shares. As of the Closing, former Churchill’s public stockholders owned approximately 12.8% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, Legacy Lucid’s former shareholders owned approximately 73.7% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock (with Ayar owning approximately 62.7% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock), Churchill Sponsor IV LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Churchill Sponsor” or the “Sponsor”) owned approximately 3.2% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, and the PIPE Investors owned approximately 10.3% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock.

Questions and Answers About These Proxy Materials and Voting

Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

Pursuant to “Notice and Access” rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the internet. Accordingly, we are sending an Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Proxy Availability Notice”) to our stockholders of record. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Proxy Availability Notice free of charge or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Proxy Availability Notice. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials online to help reduce the environmental impact of our annual meetings and reduce our printing and mailing costs.

We expect that this Proxy Statement and the other proxy materials will be available to stockholders on or about April 28, 2022.

Why are you having a virtual annual meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual-only meeting format, via live webcast that will provide stockholders with the ability to participate in the Annual Meeting, vote their shares and ask questions. We believe that a virtual meeting will enable expanded access and increased stockholder attendance and participation in light of the public health and travel concerns related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the resultant recommendations issued by federal, state and local governments.

How can I attend a virtual annual meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be held on June 9, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. (Pacific Time) via live webcast.

Only stockholders of record and beneficial owners of shares of our Common Stock as of the close of business on April 12, 2022, the record date, may participate in the Annual Meeting, including voting and asking questions during the virtual Annual Meeting. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting physically in person.

In order to attend the Annual Meeting, you must register at www.proxydocs.com/LCID. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including a unique link that will allow you access to the Annual Meeting and to vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting.

As part of the registration process, you must enter the control number located on your proxy card, voting instruction form, or Proxy Availability Notice. If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, you will also need to provide the registered name on your account and the name of your broker, bank or other nominee as part of the registration process. If you are having trouble registering online, please use the link “Having trouble registering” at the bottom of the registration page to access the FAQ or email DSMSupport@mediantonline.com.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy in advance of the meeting by one of the methods described in these proxy materials.

Can I ask questions at the virtual Annual Meeting?

Stockholders as of our Record Date who attend and participate in our virtual Annual Meeting will have an opportunity to submit questions live via the internet during a designated portion of the meeting. These stockholders may also submit a question in advance of the Annual Meeting by registering at www.proxydocs.com/LCID. In both cases, stockholders must have available their control number provided on their proxy card, voting instruction form, or Proxy Availability Notice.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Proxy Availability Notice?

If you receive more than one Proxy Availability Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on each Proxy Availability Notice to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Will I receive any other proxy materials by mail?

We may send you a proxy card, along with a second Proxy Availability Notice, by mail on or after April 28, 2022.

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date of April 12, 2022 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 1,667,235,197 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If, on April 12, 2022, your shares were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Equiniti Trust Company, then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote at the Annual Meeting or vote by proxy.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy over the telephone or on the internet as instructed below (see “How do I vote?”) or complete, date, sign and return the proxy card mailed to you to ensure your vote is counted.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee

If, on April 12, 2022, your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and the Proxy Availability Notice is being forwarded to you by the organization that holds your account. The organization holding your account is considered to be the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee regarding how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. You may attend and vote at the Annual Meeting by registering as instructed above (see “How can I attend a virtual annual meeting?).

What am I voting on?

There are five matters scheduled for a vote:

■

Election of directors;

​

■

Ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP (“GT”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022;

​

■

Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers;

​

■

Approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers; and

​

■

Approval of the amendment of the Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan.

​

What if another matter is properly brought before the Annual Meeting?

Our Board of Directors (the “Board” or the “Board of Directors”) knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote the shares for which you grant your proxy on those matters in accordance with their best judgment.

What is the Board’s voting recommendation?

The Board recommends that you vote your shares:

■

“For” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers;

​

■

For the approval, on an advisory basis, of  “One Year” as the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers; and

​

■

“For” the approval of the amendment of the Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan.

​

How do I vote?

Regarding the election of directors, you may either vote “For” the nominees to the Board or you may “Withhold” your vote for any nominee you specify. Regarding the approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on

the compensation of our named executive officers, you may vote “One Year,” “Two Years,” “Three Years,” or “Abstain.” For any other matters to be voted on, you may vote “For” or “Against,” or abstain from voting.

The procedures for voting depend on whether your shares are registered in your name or are held by a bank, broker or other nominee:

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote at the Annual Meeting, or vote in advance of the Annual Meeting by proxy over the telephone, by proxy through the internet, or by proxy using a proxy card that you may request or that we may elect to deliver at a later time. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote in advance by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the Annual Meeting and vote even if you have already voted by proxy. Voting at the Annual Meeting will have the effect of revoking your previously submitted proxy (see “Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?” below).

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker, Bank or Other Nominee

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you should have received a Proxy Availability Notice containing voting instructions from that organization rather than from us. Simply follow the voting instructions in the Proxy Availability Notice to ensure that your vote is counted.

How many votes do I have?

On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of Common Stock you own as of April 12, 2022, the Record Date.

What if I return a proxy card or otherwise vote but do not make specific choices?

If you return a signed and dated proxy card or otherwise vote without marking voting selections, your shares will be voted, as applicable, “For” the election of each of the nominees for director, “For” the ratification of GT as our independent registered public accounting firm; “For” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, for the approval, on an advisory basis, of  “One Year” as the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers, and “For” the amendment of the Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan. If any other matter is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your proxy holder (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his or her best judgment.

Will my vote be kept confidential?

Proxies, ballots and voting tabulations are handled on a confidential basis to protect your voting privacy. This information will not be disclosed, except as required by law.

Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?

The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board for use at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, we will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Our directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other nominees for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?

Yes. You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares, you may revoke your proxy in any one of the following ways:

■

You may grant a subsequent proxy via the internet or telephone.

​

■

You may submit another properly completed proxy card with a later date.

​

■

You may send a timely written notice that you are revoking your proxy to our Secretary at 7373 Gateway Boulevard, Newark, CA 94560, which must be received by June 8, 2022.

​

■

You may attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. Simply attending the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy.

​

Your most current proxy card or telephone or internet proxy is the one that is counted, so long as it is provided within the applicable deadline. If your shares are held by your broker, banker or other nominee, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee to change your vote or revoke your proxy or you may attend and vote at the Annual Meeting.

When are stockholder proposals for inclusion in our Proxy Statement for next year’s annual meeting due?

Stockholders wishing to present proposals for inclusion in our Proxy Statement for the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2023 Annual Meeting”) pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), must submit their proposals so that they are received by us at our principal executive offices no later than December 30, 2022. Proposals should be sent to our Secretary at 7373 Gateway Boulevard, Newark, CA 94560.

When are other proposals and stockholder nominations for the 2023 Annual Meeting due?

With respect to proposals and nominations not to be included in our Proxy Statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, our amended and restated bylaws (our “Bylaws”) provide that stockholders who wish to nominate a director or propose other business to be brought before the stockholders at an annual meeting of stockholders must notify our Secretary by a written notice, which notice must be received at our principal executive offices not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary date of the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

Stockholders wishing to present nominations for director or proposals for consideration at the 2023 Annual Meeting under these provisions of our Bylaws must submit their nominations or proposals so that they are received at our principal executive offices not later than March 11, 2023 and not earlier than February 9, 2023 in order to be considered. In the event that the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to such anniversary date or delayed more than 70 days after such anniversary date then to be timely such notice must be received by the Company no earlier than 120 days prior to the 2023 Annual Meeting and no later than the later of 70 days prior to the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting was first made by the Company.

Nominations or proposals should be sent in writing to our Secretary at 7373 Gateway Boulevard, Newark, CA 94560. A stockholder’s notice to nominate a director or bring any other business before the Annual Meeting or the 2023 Annual Meeting must set forth certain information, which is specified in our Bylaws. A complete copy of our Bylaws is included as Exhibit 3.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

How are votes counted?

Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately count votes “For,” votes to “Withhold” and broker non-votes for the proposal to elect directors. The inspector of election will separately count votes for “One Year,” “Two Years,” “Three Years,” or “Abstain” and broker non-votes for the proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the

frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. With respect to other proposals, the inspector of election will separately count votes “For,” votes “Against,” votes to “Abstain” and broker non-votes (if applicable).

What are “broker non-votes”?

Broker non-votes occur when a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” does not give instructions to the broker, bank or other nominee holding the shares as to how to vote. Generally, if shares are held in street name, the beneficial owner of the shares is entitled to give voting instructions to the broker, bank or other nominee holding the shares. If the beneficial owner does not provide voting instructions, the broker, bank or other nominee can still vote the shares with respect to matters that are considered to be “routine,” but cannot vote the shares with respect to “non-routine” matters. Under the rules and interpretations of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”), which generally apply to all brokers, banks or other nominees, on voting matters characterized by Nasdaq as “routine,” Nasdaq member firms have the discretionary authority to vote shares for which their customers do not provide voting instructions. On non-routine proposals, such “uninstructed shares” may not be voted by member firms. Only the proposal to ratify the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm is considered a “routine” matter for this purpose and brokers, banks or other nominees generally have discretionary voting power with respect to such proposal. Broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting.

What is the effect of abstentions, votes to withhold and broker non-votes?

Abstentions: Under Delaware law (under which we are incorporated), abstentions are counted as shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, but they are not counted as shares cast. Our Bylaws provide that a stockholder action (other than the election of directors) shall be decided by the vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of votes of the Company’s capital stock cast on the matter. Therefore, abstentions will have no effect on Proposal No. 2: Ratification of the Selection of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Proposal No. 3: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, Proposal No. 4: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers or Proposal No. 5: The approval of the amendment of the Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan.

Votes to Withhold: For Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors, you may vote “For” all or some of the nominees or you may “Withhold” your vote with respect to one or more of the nominees. The nine nominees who receive the most “For” votes cast by the holders of shares either present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy will be elected to our Board. Broker non-votes will have no effect on Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors. In an uncontested election, “Withhold” votes will not prevent a candidate from getting elected.

Broker Non-Votes: A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding your shares in street name does not vote on a particular matter because you did not provide the broker, bank or other nominee voting instructions and the broker, bank or other nominee lacks discretionary voting authority to vote the shares because the matter is considered “non-routine” under Nasdaq rules. The “non-routine” matters on the agenda for the Annual Meeting are Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors, Proposal No. 3: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, Proposal No. 4: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers and Proposal No. 5: The approval of the amendment of the Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan.

Broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. However, because broker non-votes are not considered under Delaware law to be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, they will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors, Proposal No. 3: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, Proposal No. 4: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers and Proposal No. 5: The approval of the amendment of the Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan. As a result, if you hold your shares in street name and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares on these proposals, no votes will be cast on your behalf on these proposals. Therefore, it is critical that you indicate your vote on this proposal if you want your vote to be counted. The proposal to ratify the selection of GT as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022 should be considered a “routine” matter. Therefore, your broker, bank or other nominee will be able to vote on Proposal No. 2: Ratification of the Selection of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm even if it does not receive instructions from you, so long as it holds your shares in its name.

How many votes are needed to approve each proposal?

A “Plurality,” with regard to the election of directors, means that the nine nominees who receive the most “For” votes cast by the holders of shares either present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy will be elected to our Board. A “Plurality,” with regard to the approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers, means that the alternative among “One Year,” “Two Years,” or “Three Years” that receives the highest number of votes cast by the holders of shares present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy will be deemed to be the frequency preferred by our stockholders. A “Majority Cast,” with regard to each of the other proposals means that, to be approved, a majority of the votes cast on the proposal must be voted “For” the proposal.

Accordingly:

■

Proposal No. 1: For the election of directors, the nines nominees receiving the most “For” votes from the holders of shares present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on Proposal No. 1 will be elected as directors to hold office until the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders. Only votes “For” or “Withheld” will affect the outcome. Broker non-votes will have no effect.

​

■

Proposal No. 2: To be approved, a majority of the total votes cast on Proposal No. 2 must be voted “For” the ratification of the selection of GT as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Broker non-votes are not applicable with respect to Proposal No. 2 as brokers generally have discretion to vote uninstructed shares on this proposal. Abstentions will have no effect.

​

■

Proposal No. 3: To be approved, a majority of the total votes cast on Proposal No. 3 must be voted “For” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers. Only votes “For” or “Against” will affect the outcome. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect.

​

■

Proposal No. 4: The alternative among “One Year,” “Two Years,” or “Three Years” that receives the highest number of votes cast will be deemed to be the frequency preferred by our stockholders. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect.

​

■

Proposal No. 5: To be approved, a majority of the total votes cast on Proposal No. 5 must be voted “For” the approval of the amendment of the Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan. Only votes “For” or “Against” will affect the outcome. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect.

​

None of the proposals, if approved, entitles stockholders to appraisal rights under Delaware law or our certificate of incorporation.

What is the quorum requirement?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid stockholder meeting. A quorum will be present if stockholders holding at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote are present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 1,667,235,197 shares outstanding and entitled to vote. Virtual attendance at our Annual Meeting constitutes “presence” for purposes of a quorum at the meeting.

Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy by mail, over the phone or through the internet (or one is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or other nominee) or if you vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions, votes

to “Withhold” and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, then either the chair of the Annual Meeting or the holders of a majority of shares present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy may adjourn the meeting to another date. At any adjourned Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the Annual Meeting as originally notified. If the adjournment is for more than 30 days, or if after that adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned Annual Meeting, a notice of the adjourned Annual Meeting shall be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the adjourned Annual Meeting.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. In addition, final voting results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we expect to file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Form 8-K with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish the preliminary results within four business days after the Annual Meeting and file an additional Form 8-K to publish the final results within four business days after the final results are known to us.

If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your shares, please write to Lucid Investor Relations at investor@lucidmotors.com.

Interest of Certain Persons in Matters to Be Acted Upon

Employees and non-employee directors will be eligible to receive awards under the Amended and Restated Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan. Accordingly, members of our Board (including as director nominees) and our executive officers have a substantial interest in the approval of the amendment of the Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan. The tables below under “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” provide information concerning all outstanding awards made to a named executive officer as of December 31, 2021, including, but not limited to, awards made under the Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan.

Other than disclosed above, none of our director, nominee for election as director, or executive officer has any special interest in any matter to be voted upon other than election to the Board of Directors.

 ​

of such annual or special meeting of stockholders, it has the right to nominate one director; (vi) less than 10% of the shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the record date of such annual or special meeting of stockholders, it will not have the right to nominate any directors pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement. If the size of our Board is increased or decreased, the number of directors Ayar is entitled to nominate will be increased or decreased in proportion to such increase or decrease in the size of our Board, rounded down to the nearest whole number.

Further, for so long as Ayar beneficially owns twenty percent (20%) or greater of the shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding, it has the right to designate the chairman of our Board. In addition, for so long as Ayar beneficially owns shares of our Common Stock representing at least one-third (33 1∕3%) of the Common Stock then issued and outstanding, Ayar has the right to have at least one Ayar director appointed to serve on each committee of the board. For additional information, please see section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” In accordance with the Investor Rights Agreement, Turqi Alnowaiser, Frank Lindenberg, Andrew Liveris, Nichelle Maynard-Elliott and Tony Posawatz were designated for nomination by Ayar to the Board of Directors and nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board.

*

Chairman of the Board

​

A brief biography of each nominee and each continuing director is also set forth below, which includes information, as of the date of this Proxy Statement, regarding specific and particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills of each nominee that led the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to believe that the director should serve on the Board:

Vote Required

For the election of directors, the nines nominees receiving the most “For” votes from the holders of shares present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on Proposal No. 1 will be elected as directors to hold office until the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders. Only votes “For” or “Withheld” will affect the outcome. Broker non-votes will have no effect.

Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance

This section describes key corporate governance guidelines and practices that we have adopted. Complete copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters of the committees of the Board and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, described below, can be found in the Governance section of the Investors section of our website at https://ir.lucidmotors.com/​governance/documents-and-charters. Alternatively, you can request a copy of any of these documents free of charge by writing to: Jonathan Butler, General Counsel & Secretary, c/o Lucid Group, Inc., 7373 Gateway Boulevard, Newark, CA 94560. Information on or accessible through our website is not incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement.

Controlled Company

Our Common Stock is listed on Nasdaq. As Ayar controls more than 50% of our combined voting power, we are a “controlled company” for purposes of Nasdaq’s rules and corporate governance standards and, as a result, qualify for exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. Although as of the date of this Proxy Statement, we do not utilize any of these exemptions, we may elect to utilize one or more of these exemptions for so long as we remain a “controlled company.” In the event that we cease to be a “controlled company” and our shares continue to be listed on Nasdaq, we will be required to comply with these provisions within the applicable transition periods.

Board Composition

Our Board of Directors consists of nine members. Andrew Liveris is the Chairman of our Board. The primary responsibilities of our Board are to provide oversight, strategic guidance, counseling and direction to management. Our Board meets on a regular basis and additionally, as required. In accordance with the Investor Rights Agreement, Turqi Alnowaiser, Frank Lindenberg, Andrew Liveris, Nichelle Maynard-Elliott and Tony Posawatz were designated for nomination by Ayar to the Board of Directors and nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board.

All directors will be elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders. Each director’s term continues until the election and qualification of their successor, or their earlier death, resignation or removal.

Director Independence

The Board has affirmatively determined that all of the nominees, other than Peter Rawlinson, are independent directors within the meaning of the applicable Nasdaq listing standards and relevant securities and other laws, rules and regulations regarding the definition of  “independent” ​(the “Independent Directors”). In making these determinations, our Board of Directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our Board of Directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director, and the transactions involving them described in the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” There are no family relationships between any director and any of our executive officers.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board reviews its leadership structure periodically as part of its annual self-assessment process. In addition, the Board continues to monitor developments in corporate governance as well as the approaches our peers undertake.

The Board believes that it is important to retain the flexibility to allocate the responsibilities of the offices of Chairman of the Board (“Chair”) and Chief Executive Officer in any manner that it determines to be in the best interests of the Company at any point in time. Our Chair is currently Andrew Liveris. The Chair and our Chief Executive Officer are currently separate. Our Board of Directors does not currently have a policy as to whether the role of Chair and the Chief Executive Officer should be separate. Our Board of Directors believes that the Company and its stockholders are best served by maintaining the flexibility to determine whether the Chair and Chief Executive Officer positions should be separated or combined at a given point in time in order to provide appropriate leadership for us at that time. At any time the Company is not availing itself of the “controlled company” exceptions under the Nasdaq rules, in order to maintain the independent integrity of the Board, if the Chair is not an independent director, the Board shall appoint a lead director who must be independent. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines note that all directors are elected by the stockholders and all have an equal voice. The Chair and the Chief Executive Officer are free, as is the Board of Directors as a whole, to call upon any one or more directors to provide leadership in a given situation should a special need arise.

Additionally, pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement and subject to Ayar’s continued beneficial ownership of specified amounts of our Common Stock (as described above), Ayar is entitled to select the Chair.

The Board of Directors, including each of its committees, also has complete and open access to any member of the Company’s management and the authority to retain independent advisors as the Board or such committee deems appropriate. In addition, all members of the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee are Independent Directors, and the committee chairs have authority to hold executive sessions without management and non-Independent Directors present.

Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

One of the Board’s key functions is informed oversight of our risk management process. The Board believes that its current leadership structure facilitates its risk oversight responsibilities. In particular, the Board believes the majority-independent Board and independent Board committees provide a well-functioning and effective balance to an experienced Chief Executive Officer. The Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through the Board as a whole, as well as through various Board standing committees that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. For example, the Board acts as the ultimate decision-making body of the Company and advises and oversees management, who are responsible for the day-to-day operations and management of the Company. The Audit Committee monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitors the effectiveness of our corporate governance guidelines and policies. The Compensation Committee assesses and monitors whether any of our compensation policies and programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking.

It is the responsibility of the committee chairs to report findings regarding material risk exposures to the Board as quickly as possible. Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel coordinate between the Board and management with regard to the determination and implementation of responses to any problematic risk management issues. It is the responsibility of the committee chairs to report findings regarding material risk exposures to the Board as quickly as possible.

Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel coordinate between the Board and management with regard to the determination and implementation of responses to any problematic risk management issues.

Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board oversees our business. It establishes overall policies and standards and reviews the performance of management. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the Board held 14 meetings. Each Board member attended 75% or more of the aggregate meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they served held during the period for which they were a director or committee member. Our directors are encouraged to attend our annual meetings of stockholders, but we do not currently have a policy relating to director attendance.

Our Independent Directors meet from time to time in executive session. The Board and each of our standing independent committees typically holds an executive session of non-management directors (all of whom are Independent Directors) as a part of every regularly scheduled quarterly meeting.

Information Regarding Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board has a number of committees that perform certain functions for the Board. The current committees of the Board are the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Executive Committee. Below is a description of each committee of the Board. Each of the committees has authority to engage legal counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the applicable Nasdaq listing standards and relevant securities and other laws, rules and regulations regarding “independence” and that each member is free of any relationship that would impair his or her individual exercise of independent judgment with regard to our Company.

Audit Committee

The Board has a separately designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee was established by the Board to assist the Board in its oversight of the integrity of our financial statements and internal controls, and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of the qualification, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm as well as the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee consists of Janet S. Wong, Glenn R. August and Frank Lindenberg, with Janet S. Wong serving as chairperson. Our Board has determined (i) that each of Janet S. Wong, Glenn R. August and Frank Lindenberg satisfies the requirements for independence and financial literacy under the rules and regulations of Nasdaq and the SEC and (ii) that Janet S. Wong qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in the SEC rules and regulations and satisfies the financial sophistication requirements of Nasdaq. In making that determination, the Board relied on the past business experience of Janet S. Wong. Please see the description of the business experience for Janet S. Wong under the heading “Nominees for Director.” This designation does not impose any duties, obligations or liabilities that are greater than are generally imposed on members of our Audit Committee and our Board of Directors. Our Audit Committee is directly responsible for, among other things:

■

selecting and hiring our registered public accounting firm;

​

■

evaluating the performance and independence of our registered public accounting firm;

​

■

approving the audit and pre-approving any non-audit services to be performed by our registered public accounting firm;

​

■

reviewing the integrity of our financial statements and related disclosures and reviewing our critical accounting policies and practices;

​

■

reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control policies and procedures and our disclosure controls and procedures;

​

■

overseeing procedures for the treatment of complaints relating to accounting, internal accounting controls or audit matters;

​

■

reviewing and discussing with management and the registered public accounting firm the results of the annual audit, our quarterly financial statements and our publicly filed reports;

​

■

establishing procedures for employees to anonymously submit concerns about questionable accounting or audit matters;

​

■

reviewing and approving in advance any proposed related-person transactions; and

​

■

preparing the audit committee report that the SEC requires in our annual proxy statement.

​

Our Audit Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the Nasdaq. In 2021, the Audit Committee met ten times. The Audit Committee charter can be found in the Governance section of the Investors section of our website at https://ir.lucidmotors.com/governance/documents-and-charters. Information on or accessible through our website is not incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement. The Audit Committee charter grants the Audit Committee authority to obtain, at our expense, advice and assistance from internal and external legal, accounting or other advisors and consultants and other external resources that the Audit Committee considers necessary or appropriate in the performance of its duties.

As required by its charter, the Audit Committee conducts a self-evaluation at least annually. The Audit Committee also reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter at least annually and recommends any proposed changes to the Board for its consideration.

The Board annually reviews the Nasdaq listing standards’ definition of independence for Audit Committee members and has determined that all members of our Audit Committee are “independent” and “financially literate” under Nasdaq listing standards and that members of the Audit Committee received no compensation from the Company other than for service as a director.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee consists of Andrew Liveris, Frank Lindenberg and Anthony Posawatz, with Andrew Liveris serving as chairperson. Our Board has determined that each of Andrew Liveris, Frank Lindenberg and Anthony Posawatz satisfies the requirements for independence under the rules and regulations of Nasdaq and the SEC. Our Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:

■

determining, or recommending to the Board for determination, the compensation of our executive officers, including our chief executive officer;

​

■

administering our equity compensation plans;

​

■

overseeing our overall compensation policies and practices, compensation plans, and benefits programs; and

​

■

preparing the compensation committee report that the SEC requires in our annual proxy statement.

​

Our Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the Nasdaq. During 2021, the Compensation Committee met four times. The Compensation Committee charter can be found in the Governance section of the Investors section of our website https://ir.lucidmotors.com/governance/documents-and-charters. Information on or accessible through our website is not incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee charter grants the Compensation Committee sole authority to retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser, including the authority to approve the consultant’s reasonable compensation. The Compensation Committee may select such advisers, or receive advice from any other adviser, only after taking into consideration all factors relevant to that person’s independence from management, including those independence factors enumerated by Nasdaq rules.

Under the Compensation Committee charter, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, delegate its duties to a subcommittee or to the Chair of the Compensation Committee.

As required by its charter, the Compensation Committee conducts a self-evaluation at least annually. The Compensation Committee also annually reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter and recommends any proposed changes to the Board for its consideration.

Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures

The implementation of our compensation philosophy is carried out under the supervision of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee charter requires that the Compensation Committee meet as often as it determines is appropriate to carry out its responsibilities under the charter. The agenda for each meeting is usually developed by the Chair of the Compensation Committee, in consultation with other Compensation Committee members, management and the Compensation Committee’s independent advisors. The Compensation Committee also meets regularly in executive session. Meetings may, at the discretion of

the Compensation Committee, include other directors or members of management in addition to the Compensation Committee’s independent advisors, for the purpose of providing analysis and information to assist management with their recommendations on various compensation matters. Management does not participate in the executive sessions of the Compensation Committee. For a description of the role of our management and any compensation consultants for executive compensation decisions for fiscal 2021, please see the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

■

the knowledge, skills and experience of nominees, including experience in the industry in which we operate, business, finance, management or public service, in light of prevailing business conditions and the knowledge, skills and experience already possessed by other members of the Board;

​

■

familiarity with domestic and international business matters;

​

■

familiarity and experience with legal and regulatory requirements; and

​

■

experience with accounting rules and practices.

​

Considerations in Evaluating Director Nominees

Pursuant to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter and subject to the Investor Rights Agreement, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews the composition of the Board in light of current challenges and needs of the Board and the Company, and determines whether it may be appropriate to add or remove individuals after considering issues of judgment, diversity, skills, background and experience. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy regarding diversity on the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is sensitive to the importance of nominating persons with different perspectives and experience to enhance the deliberation and decision-making processes of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers applicable laws and regulations, such as recently enacted legislation in California which requires exchange-listed companies headquartered in California with boards with six or more members to have a minimum of three women directors by December 31, 2021, boards to have a minimum of one director from an underrepresented community by December 31, 2021 and boards with between five and eight members to have a minimum of two directors from underrepresented communities by December 31, 2022.

Once the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board determine that it is appropriate to add a new director, either as a replacement or as a new position, subject to the Investor Rights Agreement, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses a flexible set of procedures in selecting individual director candidates. This flexibility allows the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to adjust the process to best satisfy the objectives it is attempting to accomplish in any director search. The first step in the general process is to identify the type of candidate the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may desire for a particular opening, including establishing the specific target skill areas, experiences and backgrounds that are to be the focus of a director search. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider candidates recommended by management, by members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, by the Board, by stockholders or by a third party it may engage to conduct a search for possible candidates. In considering candidates submitted by stockholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will take into consideration the needs of the Board, the qualifications of the candidate and our obligations under the Investor Rights Agreement.

Once candidates are identified, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts an evaluation of qualified candidates. The evaluation generally includes interviews and background and reference checks. There is no difference in the evaluation process of a candidate recommended by a stockholder as compared to the evaluation process of a candidate identified by any of the other means described above. In identifying and evaluating potential nominees to serve as directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will examine each nominee on a case-by-case basis regardless of who recommended the nominee and take into account all factors it considers appropriate.

If the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines that a candidate should be nominated as a candidate for election to the Board, the candidate’s nomination is then recommended to the Board, and the directors may in turn conduct their own review to the extent they deem appropriate. When the Board has agreed upon a candidate, such candidate is recommended to the stockholders for election at an annual meeting of stockholders or appointed as a director by a vote of the Board as appropriate.

Stockholder Nominations to the Board of Directors

In order for a stockholder to have a candidate considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a stockholder should submit a written recommendation that includes (A) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director: (1) all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected; and (2) a reasonably detailed description of any compensatory, payment or other financial agreement, arrangement or understanding that such person has with any other person or entity other than the Company including the amount of any payment or payments received or receivable thereunder, in each case in connection with candidacy or service as a director of the Company

(a “Third-Party Compensation Arrangement”), (B) as to any other business that the stockholder proposes to bring before the meeting, a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the text of the proposal or business (including the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and in the event that such business includes a proposal to amend these Bylaws, the text of the proposed amendment), the reasons for conducting such business and any material interest in such business of such stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made and (C) as to the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made:

(1)

the name and address of such stockholder (as they appear on the Company’s books) and any such beneficial owner;

​

(2)

for each class or series, the number of shares of capital stock of the Company that are held of record or are beneficially owned by such stockholder and by any such beneficial owner;

​

(3)

a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding between or among such stockholder and any such beneficial owner, any of their respective affiliates or associates, and any other person or persons (including their names) in connection with the proposal of such nomination or other business;

​

(4)

a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including, regardless of the form of settlement, any derivative, long or short positions, profit interests, forwards, futures, swaps, options, warrants, convertible securities, stock appreciation or similar rights, hedging transactions and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into by or on behalf of, or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding that has been made, the effect or intent of which is to create or mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of, such stockholder or any such beneficial owner or any such nominee with respect to the Company’s securities;

​

(5)

a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of stock of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to bring such nomination or other business before the meeting;

​

(6)

a representation as to whether such stockholder or any such beneficial owner intends or is part of a group that intends to (i) deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the voting power of the Company’s outstanding capital stock required to approve or adopt the proposal or to elect each such nominee and/or (ii) otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of such proposal or nomination;

​

(7)

any other information relating to such stockholder, beneficial owner, if any, or director nominee or proposed business that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filing required to be made in connection with the solicitation of proxies in support of such nominee or proposal pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act; and

​

(8)

such other information relating to any proposed item of business as the Company may reasonably require to determine whether such proposed item of business is a proper matter for stockholder action.

​

Stockholder recommendations should be addressed to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in care of our Secretary at 7373 Gateway Boulevard, Newark, CA 94560.

Each of the current directors have been recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to the Board for reelection as our directors at the Annual Meeting, and the Board has approved such recommendations.

Executive Committee

The executive committee consists of Andrew Liveris, Turqi Alnowaiser, Nancy Gioia, Anthony Posawatz and Peter Rawlinson, with Andrew Liveris serving as chairperson. The executive committee reviews, discusses with management and makes recommendations regarding the implementation and execution of our business plan, operational performance and certain other matters and approves transactions below certain thresholds set by our Board.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

Our relationship with our stockholders is an important part of our corporate governance program. Engaging with our stockholders helps us to understand how they view us, to set goals and expectations for our performance, and to identify emerging issues that may affect our strategies, corporate governance, compensation practices or other aspects of our operations. Our stockholder and investor outreach include investor road shows, analyst meetings, and investor conferences and meetings. We also

communicate with stockholders and other stakeholders through various media, including our annual report and SEC filings, proxy statement, news releases and our website. Our conference calls for quarterly earnings releases are open to all. These calls are available in real time and as archived webcasts on our website for a period of time.

The Board has adopted a process for stockholders and others to send communications to the Board or any director. All such communications should be sent by mail addressed to the Board or any particular director at 7373 Gateway Boulevard, Newark, CA 94560, c/o Jonathan Butler, General Counsel & Secretary. All communications received by Jonathan Butler will be sent directly to the Board or any particular director.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Board of Directors has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of our code of business conduct and ethics is available in the Governance section of the Investors section of our website at https://ir.lucidmotors.com/governance/documents-and-charters. Information on or accessible through our website is not incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement. We intend to disclose future amendments to our code of business conduct and ethics, or any waivers of such code, on our website or in public filings.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Tony Posawatz, one of our non-employee directors, served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Fisker Automotive from 2012 to 2013. In late 2013, after Mr. Posawatz had left his position, Fisker Automotive filed for bankruptcy protection.

There are no material proceedings to which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the Company, any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate of the Company, or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

 ​

(1)

Audit fees for GT for 2020 and 2021 were for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements, review of interim financial statements, assistance with registration statements filed with the SEC and services that are normally provided by GT in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Fees for the year ended December 31, 2021 included approximately $486,000 billed in connection with our business combination with Churchill which closed on July 23, 2021.

​

The Audit Committee or a delegate thereof pre-approves the scope of the audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as all associated fees and terms, pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee evaluates the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence, and presents its conclusions to the full Board on at least an annual basis.

All of the services provided by GT since the Closing of the Merger in July 2021, and fees for such services, were pre- approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with these standards.

Change in Accountants

Marcum LLP

On July 23, 2021, the Board dismissed Marcum LLP (“Marcum”), Churchill’s independent registered public accounting firm prior to the Closing of the Merger, as our independent registered public accounting firm effective following completion of our review of the quarter ended June 30, 2021, which consisted only of the accounts of Churchill prior to the Closing of the Merger.

The audit report of Marcum on Churchill’s, our legal predecessor, balance sheet as of December 31, 2020 and the statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the period from April 30, 2020 (inception) to December 31, 2020, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainties, audit scope or accounting principles.

During the period from April 30, 2020 (inception) to December 31, 2020 and subsequent interim period through July 23, 2021, there were no disagreements between Churchill and Marcum on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Marcum, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in its reports on Churchill’s financial statements for such period.

During the period from April 30, 2020 (inception) to December 31, 2020 and subsequent interim period through July 23, 2021, on May 14, 2021, following the issuance of the statement regarding the accounting and reporting considerations for warrants issued by special purpose acquisition companies entitled “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”)” by the SEC, Churchill’s management and the audit committee of Churchill’s board of directors, after consultation with management and a discussion with Marcum, concluded that Churchill’s financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2020, and the financial statements as of August 3, 2020 and

as of and for the period ended September 30, 2020 (the “Original Financial Statements”) should no longer be relied upon and are to be restated in order to correct a classification error. The Original Financial Statements were restated in the financial statements accompanying Churchill’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on May 14, 2021.

As part of such process, Churchill identified a material weakness in its internal controls over financial reporting, solely related to Churchill’s accounting for warrants. There were no other “reportable events” ​(as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act).

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Legacy Lucid dismissed Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as its independent auditors on October 13, 2020. The decision to dismiss Deloitte was approved by Legacy Lucid’s board of directors.

Deloitte performed its audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAS”) and issued an independent auditors’ report (“report”) on Legacy Lucid’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 on June 1, 2020. This report did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principle, except that Deloitte’s audit report for the year ended December 31, 2019 contained emphasis of matter paragraphs regarding (1) the change in accounting principle for the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and (2) uncertainty regarding Legacy Lucid’s ability to continue as a going concern. Deloitte did not audit Legacy Lucid’s consolidated financial statements for any period subsequent to December 31, 2019.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the subsequent interim period through October 13, 2020, there were (i) no “disagreements,” as such term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, with Deloitte on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Deloitte, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in their report, and (ii) no “reportable events,” as such term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, except for the material weakness regarding insufficient finance and accounting personnel to design, implement, and operate precise business processes and internal control activities over financial reporting in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

On October 13, 2020, Legacy Lucid engaged GT to serve as its independent registered public accounting firm. GT audited Legacy Lucid’s financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and in accordance with U.S. GAAS and issued their report on December 18, 2020. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and through October 13, 2020, neither Legacy Lucid nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted with GT regarding either: (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on its financial statements, and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to Legacy Lucid that GT concluded was an important factor considered by Legacy Lucid in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement or a reportable event.

Vote Required

To be approved, a majority of the total votes cast on Proposal No. 2 must be voted “For” the ratification of the selection of GT as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Broker non-votes are not applicable with respect to Proposal No. 2 as brokers generally have discretion to vote uninstructed shares on this proposal. Abstentions will have no effect.

 ​

Vote Required

To be approved, a majority of the total votes cast on Proposal No. 3 must be voted “For” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers. Only votes “For” or “Against” will affect the outcome. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect.

 ​

Vote Required

The alternative among “One Year,” “Two Years,” or “Three Years” that receives the highest number of votes cast will be deemed to be the frequency preferred by our stockholders. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect.

 ​

The purpose of the Plan, including as restated in the Amended Plan, is to enhance our ability to attract, retain, incent, reward, and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Lucid Group by providing these individuals with equity ownership and other incentive opportunities. The Plan includes the ESPP Addendum.

As of March 15, 2022, the number of persons eligible to participate in the Plan was approximately 4,600 employees, 110 consultants or independent contractors and eight non-employee directors. The basis for participation in the Amended Plan is the Compensation Committee’s decision, in its sole discretion, that an award to an eligible participant will further the Amended Plan’s purposes, as described above. In exercising its discretion, the Compensation Committee will consider the recommendations of management and the purposes of the Amended Plan.

Description of the Material Features of the Amended Plan

The following is a summary of the Amended Plan and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Amended Plan, a copy of which is included as Annex A to this Proxy Statement. Except for the changes to the Plan as noted above (i.e., the increase in shares available under the Plan), the Amended Plan contains substantially the same terms as the Plan.

Size of Share Pool; Shares Available and Limitations on Awards

As of March 15, 2022, there were 25,174,034 shares remaining for issuance under the Plan. If our stockholders approve the Amended Plan, the number of shares available for issuance will be increased by 15,000,000 shares effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting (the “Restatement Date”).

More specifically, as of the Restatement Date (assuming our stockholders approve the Amended Plan), the maximum aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance as awards under the Amended Plan on or after the Effective Date shall not exceed the sum of  (i) 36,502,669 Shares (consisting of  (x) 15,000,000 shares approved by the Board on April 27, 2022, (y) 12,500,000 shares initially authorized for issuance under Plan as of the Effective Date; and (z) an additional 9,002,669 shares initially authorized under the Plan as of the Effective Date which represents the number of shares equal to the number of unallocated shares of stock of Atieva, Inc. remaining available for issuance under the 2021 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, the 2014 Share Plan of Atieva, Inc., as amended and the 2009 Share Plan of Atieva, Inc. as amended (collectively, the “Prior Plans”) as of the Effective Date), plus (ii) any shares subject to stock awards granted under the Prior Plans outstanding as of the Effective Date that (x) expire or terminate for any reason prior to exercise or settlement; (y) are forfeited, cancelled or otherwise returned to Lucid Group because of the failure to meet a contingency or condition required to vest such shares; or (z) are reacquired, withheld (or not issued) to satisfy a tax withholding obligation in connection with an award or to satisfy the purchase price or exercise price of a stock award. The number of shares available for issuance under the Plan as of March 15, 2022, as reflected in the preceding paragraph is inclusive of shares referenced in item (ii) immediately above (i.e., shares subject to stock awards granted under Prior Plans that became available for issuance under the Plan from the Effective Date to March 15, 2022).

In addition, (i) if restricted shares or shares issued upon the exercise of options are forfeited then such shares shall again become available for awards under the Amended Plan; (ii) if restricted stock units, options, SARs (as defined below) or stock purchase rights are forfeited or terminate for any reason before being exercised or settled, or an award is settled in cash without the delivery of shares to the holder then the corresponding shares shall again become available for awards under the Amended Plan; (iii) if restricted stock units or SARs are settled, then only the number of shares (if any) actually issued in settlement of such restricted stock units or SARs shall reduce the number of shares available under the Amended Plan and the balance (including any shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations) shall again become available for awards under the Amended Plan; and (iv) any shares withheld to satisfy the exercise price or tax withholding obligation pursuant to any award of options or SARs shall be added back to the shares available for awards under the Amended Plan. The number of shares authorized for grant under the Amended Plan is subject to adjustment (as described below). Notwithstanding the foregoing, of the maximum aggregate shares issuable under the Amended Plan, up to 36,502,669 shares may be issued in the form of ISOs (as defined below), or under the ESPP Addendum.

The maximum number of shares subject to awards granted under the Amended Plan during any calendar year to any outside director (defined as a member of the Board who is not an employee or consultant of Lucid Group), plus any cash fees paid to the outside director in a calendar year for service on the Board, will not exceed $1 million in total value for the first year of service and $750,000 in total value per year thereafter.

Administration of the Amended Plan

The Amended Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee or other committee (of two or more of our directors) appointed by the Board, or by the Board acting as the committee. The Compensation Committee generally has the authority, among

other things, to interpret the Amended Plan, adopt rules relating to the Amended Plan, adopt, amend or terminate the ESPP Addendum or any sub-plan, determine participants and awards to be granted under the Amended Plan, prescribe the terms and conditions of awards, administer the ESPP Addendum, or take any other actions necessary or advisable for the administration of the Amended Plan.

Types of Awards

The following types of awards may be made under the Amended Plan. All of the awards described below are subject to the conditions, limitations, restrictions, exercise price, vesting and forfeiture provisions determined by the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, subject to such limitations as are provided in the Amended Plan. In addition, subject to the limitations provided in the Amended Plan and in accordance with applicable law, the Compensation Committee may accelerate or defer the vesting or payment of awards, cancel or modify outstanding awards, and waive any conditions or restrictions imposed with respect to awards.

Restricted Shares

A restricted share award is an award of outstanding shares that does not vest until after a specified period of time, or satisfaction of other vesting conditions as determined by the Compensation Committee, and which may be forfeited if conditions to vesting are not met. At the Compensation Committee’s discretion, participants may be credited with dividends and other distributions that will be paid to the holder only when unvested restricted shares vest. Participants are also generally entitled to the same voting rights as our other stockholders.

Non-qualified Stock Options

An award of a non-qualified stock option grants a participant the right to purchase a certain number of shares during a specified term in the future, after a vesting period, at an exercise price equal to at least 100% of the fair market value of our shares on the grant date.

The term of a non-qualified stock option may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. Lucid Group may (i) modify, extend, or renew outstanding stock options or accept the cancellation of options in return for the grant of new options or a different award or cash or (ii) offer to buy out for a payment in cash or cash equivalents a non-qualified stock option previously granted. Options may be awarded in combination with SARs, and the award may provide that options will not be exercisable unless the related SARs are forfeited.

Incentive Stock Options

An incentive stock option (“ISO”) is a stock option that meets the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), which include an exercise price of no less than 100% of fair market value on the grant date, a term of no more than ten years, and that the option be granted from a plan that has been approved by stockholders of Lucid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if granted to a participant who owns shares representing more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of shares of Lucid Group, its parent or one of its subsidiaries, an ISO must have a term of not more than five years.

Unrestricted Shares

Subject to limits in the Amended Plan, the Compensation Committee may issue unrestricted shares, in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee determines.

Stock Appreciation Rights

A stock appreciation right (“SAR”) entitles the participant to receive an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of Lucid Group’s shares on the exercise date and the exercise price of the SAR (which may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share on the grant date (except with respect to substitute awards)), multiplied by the number of shares subject to the SAR. Lucid Group may (i) modify, extend, or renew outstanding SARs or accept the cancellation of SARs in return for the grant of new SARs or a different award or cash or (ii) offer to buy out for a payment in cash or cash equivalents a SAR previously granted.

Restricted Stock Units

A restricted stock unit is an award denominated in shares that may be settled either in shares or cash, or a combination of both, subject to terms and conditions determined by the Compensation Committee. Participants may carry the right to dividend equivalents, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion.

Cash Awards

The Compensation Committee may grant cash-based awards to any participant in such number or amount, and subject to such conditions, that the Compensation Committee may determine.

Stock Purchase Rights under the ESPP Addendum

The purpose of the ESPP Addendum is to provide a broad-based employee benefit to attract the services of new employees, to retain the services of existing employees and to provide incentives for such individuals to exert maximum efforts toward our success by purchasing stock from Lucid Group on favorable terms, paid for through payroll deductions. The ESPP Addendum is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Code. The Compensation Committee may grant stock purchase rights under the ESPP Addendum to any participant who is an employee. The Compensation Committee may establish sub-plans (which need not qualify under Section 423 of the Code) to facilitate participation in the ESPP Addendum by non-U.S. employees in compliance with foreign laws. The maximum aggregate number of shares for purchase during any calendar year is 2,500,000 shares, or any other such annual limit as may be approved by the Compensation Committee.

While the ESPP Addendum is in effect, the Compensation Committee may grant options to purchase shares of stock during a specified offering period in compliance with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code. Termination of employment for any reason will be treated as an automatic withdrawal from the ESPP Addendum. The purchase price for each share purchased during an offering period will be the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of the share on the purchase date or 85% of the fair market value of the share on the offering date. No participant may be granted a right to purchase stock under the ESPP Addendum if such a purchase would result in the participant owning 5% or more of the combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of Lucid Group or any parent or subsidiary of Lucid Group. No participant shall accrue the right to purchase stock which exceeds $25,000 of fair market value of such stock per calendar year. In the event of a corporate reorganization (defined as (i) the consummation of a merger, consolidation or any other corporate reorganization of Lucid Group or (ii) the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of Lucid Group’s assets or the complete liquidation or dissolution of Lucid Group) in which the ESPP Addendum is not assumed by the surviving corporation, the offering period in progress will terminate and either 1) shares will be purchased in accordance with the terms of the ESPP Addendum or 2) all amounts in all participant accounts will be refunded without any purchase of shares.

Performance Criteria

Awards granted under the Amended Plan may be subject to specified performance criteria. The Compensation Committee may utilize any performance criteria selected by it in its sole discretion to establish performance goals.

Deferrals

Subject to compliance with Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”), the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion may permit or require participants to defer certain amounts or shares paid or issued in respect of Awards.

Adjustments

In the event of a subdivision of the outstanding common stock, a declaration of a dividend payable in shares, a declaration of a dividend payable in a form other than shares in an amount that has a material effect on the price of shares, a combination or consolidation of the outstanding common stock into a lesser number of shares, a recapitalization, a spin-off or a similar occurrence, the Compensation Committee may make appropriate and equitable adjustments in: (i) the class(es) and number of securities available for future awards; (ii) the class(es) and number of securities covered by each outstanding award; (iii) the exercise price under each outstanding option and SAR); and (iv) options to purchase shares granted pursuant to the ESPP Addendum.

Change in Control

In the event of a Change in Control (defined as (i) a change in the composition of the Board in which fewer than one half of the incumbent directors are the original directors or were elected with at least a majority of the original directors; (ii) any person who, by acquisition or aggregation of securities, is or becomes the beneficial owner of securities of Lucid Group representing 50% or more of the voting power of Lucid Group’s outstanding securities; (iii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation where 50% or more of the voting power is owned by persons who were not stockholders of Lucid Group prior to the merger or consolidation; or (iv) the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of Lucid Group’s assets), if the surviving corporation does not continue, assume or settle (subject to vesting) outstanding awards (other than stock purchase rights under the ESPP Addendum), or substitute similar stock awards for outstanding awards (other than stock purchase rights under the ESPP Addendum), then

Lucid Group may accelerate the vesting or deemed any performance-based vesting to be satisfied at the target level or based on actual performance (or the greater thereof). The Compensation Committee may also determine at the time of granting of an award or thereafter that an award will vest and/or become exercisable in connection with a Change in Control. The Compensation Committee may treat awards differently.

Assignability

Unless an award agreement provides otherwise, no award granted under the Amended Plan may be sold, assigned, conveyed, gifted, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise transferred in any manner other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

Amendment and Termination

The Board may amend, suspend or terminate the Amended Plan or the ESPP Addendum at any time, provided that amendments to any outstanding award agreements are subject to applicable legal restrictions and the consent of the participant if the participant’s right or obligations would be materially impaired.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a general summary under current law of certain United States federal income tax consequences to the Company and participants who are citizens or individual residents of the United States relating to awards granted under the Amended Plan. This summary deals with the general tax principles that apply to such awards and is provided only for general information. Certain kinds of taxes, such as foreign taxes, state and local income taxes, payroll taxes and the alternative minimum tax, are not discussed. This summary is not tax advice and it does not discuss all aspects of federal taxation that may be relevant to the Company and participants. Accordingly, the Company urges each participant to consult his or her own tax advisor as to the specific tax consequences of participation in the Amended Plan under federal, state, local and other applicable laws.

Non-Qualified Stock Options

A non-qualified stock option is an option that does not meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. A participant generally will not recognize taxable income when granted a non-qualified stock option. When the participant exercises the stock option, he or she generally will recognize taxable ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares received on the exercise date over the aggregate exercise price of the shares. The participant’s tax basis in the shares acquired on exercise of the option will be increased by the amount of such taxable income. We generally will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income that the participant recognizes, subject to any limits imposed under Section 162(m) of the Code. When the participant sells the shares acquired on exercise, the participant generally will realize long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on whether the participant holds the shares for more than one year before selling them. Special rules apply if all or a portion of the exercise price is paid in the form of shares.

Incentive Stock Options

An incentive stock option is an option that meets the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. A participant generally will not have taxable income when granted an incentive stock option or when exercising the option. If the participant exercises the option and does not dispose of the shares until the later of two years after the grant date and one year after the exercise date, the entire gain, if any, realized when the participant sells the shares generally will be taxable as long-term capital gain. We generally will not be entitled to any corresponding tax deduction. If a participant disposes of the shares received upon exercise of an incentive stock option within the one-year or two-year periods described above, it will be considered a “disqualifying disposition,” and the option will be treated as a non-qualified stock option for federal income tax purposes. If a participant exercises an incentive stock option more than three months after the participant’s employment or service with us terminates, the option will be treated as a non-qualified stock option for federal income tax purposes. If the participant is disabled and terminates employment or service because of his or her disability, the three-month period is extended to one year. The three-month period does not apply in the case of the participant’s death. Similar tax consequences will apply to stock purchase rights under the ESPP Addendum.

SARs

A participant generally does not recognize income at the time a SAR is granted. At the time cash or stock representing the amount of the appreciation is transferred to the participant pursuant to exercise of the SAR, the participant will generally be required to recognize as income an amount equal to the amount of cash or fair market value of the shares paid or transferred to the participant. Such amount will be taxable as ordinary income and we generally will be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction, subject to any limits imposed under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Restricted Stock

A participant generally will not recognize any income upon the receipt of unvested shares or restricted stock unless the participant elects under Section 83(b) of the Code, within 30 days after receipt of the shares, to recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of receipt, less any amount paid for the shares, and the Company generally will be allowed a corresponding tax deduction at that time, subject to any limits imposed under Section 162(m) of the Code. A participant who makes the election will not be allowed a deduction for the value of any shares subsequently forfeited. A participant who does not make the election generally will recognize ordinary income on the date of the lapse of the restrictions applicable to the shares, which may be at the time of grant, in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares on such date, less any amount paid for the shares. We will withhold any Federal Insurance Contribution Act (“FICA”) taxes due in respect of the shares in the year the restrictions applicable to the shares lapse, based on the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date, unless you elect under Section 83(b) of the Code, in which case we will withhold any FICA taxes due in respect of the shares in the year of grant based on the fair market value of the shares on the grant date. Generally, upon a sale or other disposition of restricted stock with respect to which a participant has recognized ordinary income (i.e., a Section 83(b) election was previously made or the restrictions previously lapsed), the participant will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on such sale or other disposition and the basis in such shares. Such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the participant holds such shares for more than one year.

RSUs

A participant generally does not recognize income at the time an RSU is granted. At the time of settlement of the award, the participant will generally recognize ordinary income equity to the fair market value of the RSUs at the time of settlement of the award, and the Company generally will be allowed a corresponding tax deduction at that time, subject to any limits imposed under Section 162(m) of the Code. We will withhold any FICA taxes due in respect of the RSUs in the year the RSUs vest based on the fair market value of the shares and/or cash underlying the award on the vesting date. Any gain or loss recognized upon a subsequent sale or exchange of the shares (if settled in shares) is generally treated as a capital gain or loss (short-term or long-term depending on the applicable holding period).

Performance Awards

Generally, in the case of performance-based awards, the participant will recognize ordinary income on the amount of cash and the fair market value of common stock received on the date of payment or settlement of the award (provided that the award is exempt from or complies with Section 409A of the Code). We generally will be entitled to a deduction for such amount at the time it is includable in the income of the participant.

Cash Awards

Upon the payment of a cash award, the amount of cash received will be ordinary income to the participant. We will be entitled to a deduction for such amount at the time it is includable in the income of the participant.

Registration with the SEC

If our stockholders approve the Amended Plan, we will file with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-8, as soon as reasonably practicable after the approval, to register the shares available for issuance under the Amended Plan.

New Plan Benefits Table

A new plan benefits table for the Amended Plan and the benefits or amounts that would have been received by or allocated to participants for the last completed fiscal year under the Amended Plan if the Amended Plan was then in effect, as described in the federal proxy rules, are not provided because all awards made under the Amended Plan will be made at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, subject to the terms of the Amended Plan. Therefore, the benefits and amounts that will be received or allocated under the Amended Plan are not determinable at this time. However, please refer to the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 2021 in this Proxy Statement which sets forth certain information regarding awards granted to our named executive officers during fiscal year 2021, as well as the section titled — 2022 Compensation Decisions in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which sets forth certain information regarding awards granted to our named executive officers in early fiscal 2022.

The per share closing price of our common stock on Nasdaq on April 26, 2022 was $17.64.

Vote Required

To be approved, a majority of the total votes cast on Proposal No. 5 must be voted “For” the approval of the amendment of the Lucid Group, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan. Only votes “For” or “Against” will affect the outcome. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect.

Lucid ESG: Principles and Impact

We believe that principles and goals need to be realized through results and impact. We measure success through the impact of our efforts: on environmental matters, social matters, and economic matters. And we believe that it is critical to underpin these efforts with robust corporate governance and transparency to the stockholders who entrust us with the critical mission to contribute to the transformation of our world. We all face an existential crisis from climate change, and we seek to help address this crisis by inspiring the adoption of sustainable transportation and energy. As an electric vehicle company relentlessly focused on efficiency, our products and in-house technology are key to this mission through the performance and range that they unlock.

We are laying the groundwork for a holistic environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) strategy to maximize our ability to positively impact our environment and society, align with investor expectations, and instill pride and purpose in our employees and customers. In 2021, we completed a high-level materiality assessment to identify priority ESG goals for our organization, taking into account insights with respect to investor expectations, peer company activities, consumer trends, and other factors. We formed an ESG Steering Committee to oversee our ESG strategy and governance which is comprised of senior executive leaders. In 2022, we are focusing on certain priority areas for our company including carbon accounting and emissions, diversity, equity and inclusion, and sustainable materials and design. We intend to identify and commit to targets in each area.

We are making an impact already in several critical ways, including:

Our Technology

■

Products: The Lucid Air Dream Edition Range achieved an EPA-estimated range of 520 miles per charge and is the longest-range electric vehicle ever rated by the U.S. EPA — capable of delivering 100+ miles of range beyond the closest competitor.* The Grand Touring version of Lucid Air also exceeds the 500 miles threshold, logging an EPA-estimated range of 516 miles per charge. Lucid Air models occupy the top six positions for overall EPA range ratings among all EVs. This achievement is based on a relentless focus on efficiency through the electric vehicle powertrain, battery pack and system, and a highly aerodynamic design with a 0.21 Cd drag coefficient. This focus on efficiency also enables our vehicles to travel further per electron of energy than any other electric vehicle in the Large vehicle class. Each extra mile that we extract per kWh of energy means less energy required and fewer carbon emissions from the electrical grid. This same efficient technology and approach also enables the possibility of vehicles with smaller, lower-cost battery packs that retain competitive range — benefitting the environment by requiring fewer battery cells per vehicle. Efficiency is a key measure of the in-house technology embedded in our products, contributing to our goal to offer a best-in-class experience to our customers while benefitting the environment.

​

■

Charging Infrastructure: We are taking steps to support the development and standardization of EV charging infrastructure and thereby further drive the adoption of sustainable electric vehicles. In 2016, we joined CharIN Association which is a leading global non-profit dedicated to promoting interoperability based on the Combined Charging System (CCS) as the global standard for electric vehicle charging. In 2021, we hosted a ‘Testival’ with CharIN at our corporate headquarters, inviting 230+ e-mobility experts from 85 business and 9 countries to participate in testing and technology discussions. To further promote EV adoption by our own employees, we have installed 83 charging stations at our corporate headquarters and factory. And we are engaged with policymakers at the U.S. Federal and state levels to participate in the development of strategies to deploy charging capacity across the United States.

​

■

Future Adaptations of our Technology: We are exploring opportunities to adapt and expand the impact of our technology. For example, we expect our battery systems expertise to enable us to produce compelling stationary energy storage system (ESS) products that offer flexibility, efficiency, and stability to our customers and the electrical grid across the residential, commercial, and utility-scale energy storage sectors. We also expect our battery systems and powertrain expertise to enable customers to power their homes through vehicle-to-grid (V2G) charging capabilities, adding resiliency to customers’ power supply and reducing impact on the grid during power outages and shortages. And we plan to explore opportunities to accelerate the transition to sustainable transportation by supplying or licensing built-to-print electric powertrain and battery system solutions based on our proprietary technology to manufacturers in the automotive, aerospace, and maritime spaces.

​

*

Ranges are cited for vehicles equipped with 19-inch wheels, and actual range will vary dependent on many factors including battery age, driving habits, charging habits, temperatures, accessory use, and other factors

​

Our Company

■

Finances: We are incorporating ESG into our decision-making on financing efforts, large and small. For example, in December 2021, we raised approximately $2 billion through convertible senior notes which we designated as green bonds, meaning we will spend $2 billion on green-eligible investments. This issuance was one of the largest green convertible offerings in market history to date, and it underscores our commitment to addressing climate change and environmental challenges.

​

■

Environmental operations: Our factory in Casa Grande, Arizona is the first greenfield EV factory in North America, and it was designed to minimize carbon emissions where practical through energy efficient design and plans for renewable energy generation onsite. We currently have a 1 mega-watt (MW) capacity solar power system installed onsite and plans in place to expand in 2022, and in total we have 2 MW capacity of solar panels across our network including solar panels installed at our California headquarters. We also recycle batteries from our production process, and we are working on a strategy for end-of-life solutions for cells including re-use and closed-loop opportunities.

​

Our People

■

Safety: We seek to protect the health and safety of our employees, business partners, and stakeholders by instilling a culture of safety in our workplaces. For example, we provide mandatory safety training to employees and visitors to our manufacturing facilities, and we have an onsite medical clinic at our Arizona facility for medical triage and occupational injuries and illnesses. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we developed and implemented a robust response plan and protocol to enable continued development of our products while mitigating exposure risk to our personnel, implemented a 24/7 Response Team for employee questions, conducted contact tracing with regular reports to employees on potential exposure, offered multiple onsite vaccination clinics for employees and their dependents, and recently implemented a vaccination requirement for new hires and visitors to our facilities.

​

■

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: We are committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workplace. We believe that our differences spark innovation. We seek to foster an equitable and inclusive work culture in which employees from all backgrounds can thrive and become partners to our local communities, and to inspire passionate innovators to join Lucid from around the world. This commitment is reflected in our company today; as of April 1, 2022, Lucid proudly notes that our leadership team includes two women, our CFO and VP of Software Validation, and three leaders from underrepresented communities; our Board of Directors includes three females and three members of underrepresented communities. We continue to drive results through initiatives such as: training on DEI topics like inclusive leadership, psychological safety, allyship, and inclusion; employee resource groups for fostering belonging and driving community outreach such as Women at Lucid, Veterans at Lucid, and Pride at Lucid; and partnerships for diversity recruiting such as with DisabilityIn (a nonprofit resource for disability inclusion), Fairygodboss (one of the largest career communities for women), the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE), and the Society of Women Engineers (SWE). We continue to review and expand our efforts in this area as we continue to grow as a global employer of choice.

​

There are no family relationships between any of our directors and any of our executive officers.

Mr. Rawlinson’s biography can be found under the section entitled “Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors” with the biographies of the other members of the Board. Biographies for our other executive officers are below.

Executive Compensation

Message to Stockholders from the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

In 2007, Lucid Motors was formed with the idea of innovating new solutions for battery systems in sedans, motorcycles, vans, and buses. In 2013, under the leadership of Chief Technology Officer (now also Chief Executive Officer) Peter Rawlinson, the company began a transformation with a new mission: to create the most captivating luxury electric vehicles on the market centered around human experience. This revamped trajectory led us to an exciting and tangible milestone this past October, when we delivered the first Lucid Air Dream Edition models to customers. Further, our Lucid Air received the prestigious honor of being named the 2022 MotorTrend Car of the Year in November. The mission defined by Peter was turned into reality through the hard work and dedication of the incredible Lucid team.

Lucid Motors began 2021 as a private company and ended the year as a public company with a market value of approximately $62.69 billion as of December 31, 2021. By the end of 2021, Peter and the Lucid team grew the value of the organization by more than $50 billion, compared to the $11.75 billion valuation of Atieva, our predecessor company, in connection with the Merger that took us public on July 23, 2021. In addition, becoming a public company has allowed us to invite even more investors along in this exciting journey with us. We are delighted by the investor response in 2021.

We have come a long way over the past several years to transform the company from one that is focused on battery and powertrain technology for other manufacturers, to a vertically-integrated EV company creating the most captivating luxury electric vehicles in the world. Manifesting these ideas into reality, with external validation and accolades, can only occur through insightful and passionate leaders and team members. Peter Rawlinson joined Lucid after holding successful leadership and technical roles at other large automotive manufacturers, including serving as Chief Engineer for Tesla’s Model S. Other senior leaders have proven themselves in their respective fields at the very best automotive, technology, design and operations companies in the world. We believe that the vision, passion and diligence of Lucid’s leadership team is unparalleled.

We are extremely proud of the business and financial achievements of the Lucid team. In that vein, we are pleased to present to you our Compensation Discussion and Analysis in 2021.

Andrew Liveris (Chair)
Frank Lindenberg
Tony Posawatz

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes our executive compensation program in 2021 for our named executive officers (“NEOs”), including our compensation philosophy and process, the objectives and elements of the program and the material factors considered in making compensation decisions.

Our NEOs were among the executive officers of Atieva, our predecessor entity, prior to the Merger and became our executive officers following the Merger. The compensation of these executive officers for the portion of 2021 that occurred prior to the Merger was determined by the board of directors of Atieva (the “Atieva Board”) or the compensation committee of Atieva (the “Atieva Committee”), not by our current Board or Compensation Committee, which were constituted in connection with the Merger.

Our NEOs for 2021 include (i) our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Technology Officer (“CEO”), (ii) our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and (iii) our two other executive officers serving as of December 31, 2021 (we did not have any other executive officers as of such date). Michael Klein and Jay Taragin, Churchill’s CEO and CFO, respectively, prior to the Merger, did not receive any compensation for services rendered to us in 2021 (except that The Klein Group, LLC, an affiliate of the Sponsor and Mr. Klein, received fees for financial advisory services provided to Lucid post-Merger. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions”).

Our NEOs for 2021 are:

Executive Summary

Key Accomplishments

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate top-level talent who possess the skills and leadership necessary to grow our business and enable long-term value creation by (i) providing compensation packages that are competitive with market practice and drive and reward the achievement of our business objectives; (ii) closely aligning the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders by providing a significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation in equity and, with respect to our CEO, linking a significant portion of his compensation to performance-based results and (iii) appropriately aligning compensation with both short-term and long-term Company performance measures and strategic objectives.

To ensure that management’s interests are aligned with those of our stockholders and to motivate and reward individual initiative and effort, our executive compensation program emphasizes a pay-for-performance compensation philosophy so that attainment of company and individual performance goals are rewarded.

Our executive compensation program design includes a mix of three key compensation elements — (i) base salary, (ii) short-term cash incentive awards and (iii) long-term equity incentive awards. In determining the amount of each compensation element awarded to our NEOs, our Compensation Committee looks at each NEO’s overall compensation package, as well as the amount of each compensation element for the NEO relative to both internal and external pay to determine whether such amounts and the overall mix of compensation elements for the NEO’s role further the principles and objectives of our executive compensation program.

Being a technology company, in addition to an automotive company, we seek to hire and retain experienced talent from the competitive technology sector, who have the ability to lead across multiple disciplines and through our highly regulated industries.

While the Compensation Committee considers a multitude of factors in its deliberations, it places no formal weighting on any one factor. As we continue to grow as a public company, the Compensation Committee intends to annually review and analyze market trends and adjust the design and operation of our executive compensation program from time to time as it deems appropriate, and will consider the extent to which the compensation of our executive officers should be further linked to performance-based results.

Executive Compensation Best Practices

Our executive compensation program is guided by the following corporate governance best practices designed to protect the interests of our stockholders:

■

Independent Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee consists only of independent directors, even though, as a controlled company, we are not required to have an independent compensation committee under Nasdaq rules.

​

■

Balanced Short-Term and Long-Term Compensation. We balance short- and long-term incentives to discourage short-term risk-taking at the expense of long-term results.

​

■

Maintain an Independent Compensation Committee Advisor. Our Compensation Committee engages its own independent compensation consultant.

​

■

No Special Executive Retirement Plans. We do not offer pension arrangements or retirement plans or arrangements with our NEOs that are different from or in addition to those offered to our other employees.

​

■

No “Single-Trigger” Change in Control Arrangements. We do not provide for “single-trigger” acceleration of compensation or benefits solely upon a change in control.

​

■

Conduct Annual Compensation Review. The Compensation Committee conducts a review at least annually of our executive compensation philosophy and strategy, including a market assessment of executive pay practices.

​

■

Performance Based. Our compensation is tied to both individual performance and company performance in terms of size, measures of success and continued eligibility.

​

■

No Excise Tax “Gross-Ups.” We do not provide any “gross-ups” for excise taxes that our employees might owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G or 4999 of the Code.

​

■

Perform Annual Compensation-Related Risk Assessment. We have strong risk and control policies, we take risk management into account when making executive compensation decisions, and we conduct an annual risk assessment of our executive and broad-based compensation programs to promote prudent risk management.

​

■

No Excessive Perks. We do not provide material executive perquisites to our NEOs.

​

■

Do Not Permit Hedging or Pledging. We prohibit directors and employees, including our NEOs, from hedging and pledging Lucid securities.

​

As we continue to transition from a newly public company to a more mature public company, we will continue to evaluate our compensation program relative to similarly situated companies.

Executive Compensation Process

Role of the Compensation Committee and Management

With respect to the portion of 2021 that preceded the closing of the Merger, our executive compensation program was administered by the Atieva Committee. Since the closing of the Merger, our executive compensation program has been administered primarily by our Compensation Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors (even though, as a controlled company, we are not required to have an independent compensation committee under Nasdaq rules). The Compensation Committee establishes our overall compensation philosophy and objectives, and is responsible for establishing, overseeing and evaluating our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee reviews and assesses whether our executive compensation program aligns with our compensation philosophy and objectives, and approves the specific

compensation of our NEOs, other than the compensation of our CEO and equity grants to our NEOs, where the Compensation Committee makes recommendations to our Board. Following such recommendation, and after discussion with the members of the Compensation Committee regarding their assessment and recommendations, the Board approves CEO compensation and equity grants to our NEOs.

The Compensation Committee also consults with members of our management team, including our CEO and our Vice President of People when making compensation decisions. Our CEO works closely with the Compensation Committee and provides the Compensation Committee with performance assessments and compensation recommendations for each NEO (other than himself), based on each NEO’s level of performance and corporate performance. While the Compensation Committee considers our CEO’s recommendations, the Compensation Committee ultimately uses its own business judgment and experience in approving, or making recommendations to the Board where applicable, regarding individual compensation elements and the amount of each element for our NEOs. Our CEO recuses himself from all determinations regarding his own compensation.

The compensation of our NEOs will be reviewed at least annually by our Compensation Committee and will be informed by the recommendations of our CEO. Our Compensation Committee will then evaluate and determine any recommended compensation adjustments or awards to our NEOs or make recommendations to the Board for final determination.

Role of Compensation Consultant

With respect to the portion of 2021 that preceded the closing of the Merger, the Atieva Committee engaged Aon to provide advice on matters relating to our executive compensation program, including information regarding competitive market practices, assessments and trends and advice relating to the design and structure of our executive compensation program. Following the closing of the Merger, the Compensation Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any compensation advisor and has sole authority to approve all such advisors’ fees and other retention terms.

Following the closing of the Merger, after evaluating Aon’s independence by considering the requirements adopted by Nasdaq and the SEC, our Compensation Committee continued to engage Aon to assist on matters relating to our executive compensation program pursuant to its authority under the Compensation Committee charter. Aon also updated the Compensation Committee on corporate governance and regulatory issues and developments. A representative of Aon attended meetings of the Compensation Committee as requested and also communicated with the Compensation Committee Chair outside of meetings. In addition to providing services to the Compensation Committee, Aon provided to us salary surveys and services relating to the tracking of the CEO’s long-term incentive award described in more detail under “Pre-Merger CEO Compensation” below.

In November 2021, after conducting a competitive search process and considering a number of candidates, the Compensation Committee decided to engage Pay Governance as its compensation consultant going forward. The Compensation Committee has evaluated Pay Governance’s independence by considering the requirements adopted by Nasdaq and the SEC, and determined that its relationship with Pay Governance does not raise any conflict of interest. As part of the Compensation Committee’s determination of Pay Governance’s independence, it received written confirmation from Pay Governance addressing these factors and supporting the independence determination. Pay Governance has not provided any other services to us and has not received any compensation from us other than with respect to services to our Compensation Committee.

Analysis of Fiscal 2021 Compensation

Compensation Elements

The 2021 executive compensation program consisted of the following elements: base salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term equity incentive compensation in the form of time-based restricted stock units. Our CEO was also granted performance-based restricted stock units and a cash transaction bonus as described in more detail below. Each element, which is further discussed below, is intended to reward and motivate executives in different ways consistent with our overall compensation philosophy. Each of the above-described compensation elements for our NEOs for fiscal 2021 is discussed in detail below, including a description of the particular element and how it fits into our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives.

Compensation-Setting Process and Competitive Positioning

When determining recommendations for our NEOs’ fiscal 2021 compensation levels, the Compensation Committee and, prior to the Merger, the Atieva Board, reviewed base salary, target annual incentive compensation opportunity, target total short-term compensation (i.e., base salary plus target incentive opportunity), annual long-term incentive and total direct compensation values

for our NEOs and those of similarly situated executives in the public market. Aon provided data at the 50th and 75th percentiles for such compensation, which the committees used as a reference. The Compensation Committee considers such data relevant to, but not determinative of, its consideration of overall executive compensation matters. The committees did not benchmark any compensation element to a specific percentile, and the committees instead established our NEOs’ compensation at levels they deemed appropriate after considering other factors, including each of our NEOs’ experience, performance, contributions and responsibilities, our short-term and long-term objectives, retention considerations and prevailing market conditions.

Base Salary

Base salaries provide a fixed source of compensation to our NEOs and are designed to reward executives for their performance and our short-term performance. We believe generally that a competitive base salary is a necessary element of our executive compensation program and is critical in attracting and retaining executive talent, including our NEOs. Base salaries for our NEOs are also intended to be competitive with those received by other individuals in similar positions at the companies with which we compete for talent, as well as equitable internally across our executive team. We believe that other compensation elements (short-term incentives and long-term incentives) are more important to attracting, motivating and retaining talent based on the current stage of the Company.

In setting annual base salaries, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration our overall financial and operating performance, each NEO’s individual performance, an evaluation of how the compensation we pay our executive officers compares both to our performance and to our peers, and other relevant factors. For NEOs other than the CEO, the Compensation Committee receives an evaluation from the CEO on that individual’s performance and a recommendation for a salary adjustment.

The Compensation Committee intends to review the base salaries of our NEOs on an annual basis and make adjustments to base salaries as it deems necessary or appropriate. To the extent base salaries are adjusted, the amount of any such adjustment would reflect a review of competitive market data, consideration of relative levels of pay internally, individual performance of the NEO, and any other circumstances that the Compensation Committee determines are relevant.

In September 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries of our NEOs, taking into consideration a competitive market analysis performed by Aon. The Compensation Committee also considered the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own base salary), as well as the other factors described above. Consistent with our intended approach to provide compensation competitive with an aggregated benchmark group of companies and in recognition of their performance, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in the annual base salaries for certain of our NEOs effective as of August 2, 2021, shortly after the Merger. The base salaries for our NEOs both before and after August 2, 2021 are set forth in the table below.

(1)

Mr. Bach’s base salary was increased to $400,000 (from $375,000) effective March 1, 2021 (prior to the Merger) in connection with his promotion from Vice President, Hardware Engineering to Senior Vice President, Product and Chief Engineer.

​

Cash Incentive Compensation

Annual Cash Incentive Plan

We use an annual cash incentive plan to motivate our NEOs to achieve our strategic and operational objectives during the year. In February 2021, the Atieva Committee approved, as part of its annual cash incentive plan for 2021, a bonus framework (“Company Bonus”) for potential payments to certain of our executive officers and key employees (including our NEOs) based on achievement

and timing of the start of customer deliveries of the Lucid Air. The Atieva Committee considered September 2021 as the target month for customer deliveries to achieve 100% of the goal for the 2021 Company Bonus.

Customer delivery was achieved in October 2021, one month after the September 2021 targeted month largely to ensure that the quality of parts and materials were in line with the vision for the Lucid brand. Under the Company Bonus program as originally approved by the Atieva Committee, this would have resulted in a Company Bonus payout of 75% of target. However, after evaluating various factors, including craftsmanship, build quality, technology achievements and industry recognition, the Compensation Committee exercised discretion to approve payments of the “Company Bonus” for 2021 at higher levels for most participants (which included senior level employees), including our NEOs, as set forth in the chart below. Bonus amounts were prorated based on hire date and subject to adjustments based on individual performance.

Each NEO’s target incentive opportunity for fiscal 2021 and the actual payout amount is set forth in the table below:

(1)

Reflects as a percentage of the applicable NEO’s annual base salary as of August 2, 2021 (i.e., after base salary adjustments for Messrs. Rawlinson and Bach). In the cases of Ms. House and Mr. Bell, reflects a pro-rated salary basis given their start dates in 2021.

​

For each NEO, the amount paid above the target in the foregoing table reflects the Compensation Committee’s adjustments for individual performance. For Mr. Rawlinson, the Compensation Committee recognized his technical leadership to design, build and deliver the longest range, most aerodynamic, fastest charging luxury electric car in the world. With respect to Messrs. Bach and Bell, the Compensation Committee recognized each executive’s individual technical leadership performance to develop and deploy a robust suite of world class engineering achievements, including the Lucid Air becoming the first-ever electric vehicle to receive an Environmental Protection Agency-rated range of 520 miles. These engineering achievements were recognized from outside the company, including the Lucid Air being named as the 2022 MotorTrend Car of the Year.

In September 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed the target incentive opportunities of our NEOs, taking into consideration a competitive market analysis performed by Aon. The Compensation Committee also considered the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own target incentive opportunity), as well as the other factors described above. Consistent with our intended approach to provide compensation competitive with similarly situated companies and in recognition of their performance, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in the target incentive opportunities of certain of our NEOs effective for fiscal year 2022. Our NEOs’ target incentive opportunities for fiscal year 2022 are set forth in the table below.

Target Bonus Opportunities: Fiscal 2022

Sign-On Bonuses

In connection with her commencement of employment in May 2021, Ms. House was provided with a one-time sign-on bonus of $100,000. Similarly, in connection with his commencement of employment in February 2021, Mr. Bell was provided with a one-time sign-on bonus of  $250,000. Each of Ms. House’s and Mr. Bell’s offer letter provides that if the executive resigns or is terminated for any reason prior to the first anniversary of her or his hire date, the executive will be required to repay to us the amount of the sign-on bonus (net of applicable tax and other withholdings).

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

We believe that providing long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards is a critical element of our executive compensation program as it encourages our NEOs to take a long-term outlook and reinforces our pay for performance culture. By providing opportunities for our employees, including our NEOs, to benefit from future successes in Lucid through the appreciation of the value of their equity awards, our Compensation Committee and Board believe that equity awards align employees’ interests and contributions with the long-term interests of Lucid’s stockholders. In addition, our Compensation Committee and Board believe that offering meaningful equity ownership in Lucid is helpful in retaining our NEOs and other key employees.

Prior to the Merger, our executive officers had generally been granted stock options by Atieva. Beginning in 2021, our executive officers, including our NEOs, were granted restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The Atieva Committee approved equity grants on February 22, 2021 to certain of our executives, including an award of 661,000 RSUs to Mr. Bach (the number of RSUs reflects adjustments made to our shares in connection with the Merger). In deciding to make such grant, the Atieva Committee considered Mr. Bach’s performance and significant contributions to Atieva and that the overall value of his existing unvested equity incentive awards may not serve as a sufficient retention tool. Mr. Bell and Ms. House were also granted an award of 1,322,000 RSUs and 661,000 RSUs, respectively, in connection with their hires (the numbers of RSUs reflect adjustments made to our shares in connection with the Merger). The Atieva Board also approved the long-term incentive award granted to Mr. Rawlinson, the terms of which are summarized below under “Pre-Merger CEO Compensation.” The table below sets forth the RSUs granted to our NEOs (other than our CEO) during 2021. We did not grant any stock options to our NEOs during 2021 and all of the 2021 long-term incentive awards were granted to our NEOs prior to the Merger, while we were still a private company. The number of RSUs in the table has been adjusted to reflect the impact of the Merger.

Fiscal 2021 Equity Incentive Awards to NEOs other than the CEO

The RSUs granted to Ms. House and Mr. Bell are generally scheduled to vest over four years, the first 25% on the first anniversary of each’s service commencement date (June 5, 2021 and July 20, 2020, respectively) and the remainder in 12 quarterly installments over the next three years with each such quarterly installment representing 1/16th of the RSUs awarded, subject to (i) the successful closing of the Merger and meeting the minimum service period requirement of 375 days after such closing (i.e., continued employment until August 2, 2022) (at which time amounts that were scheduled to vest prior to such date will vest); and (ii) continued employment through each applicable quarterly vesting date. Accordingly, with respect to Ms. House, subject to the continued employment requirement, the first installment of the RSUs (25% of the RSUs awarded) will vest on August 2, 2022 (375 days after the closing of the Merger) and the remaining twelve installments (each, 1/16 of the RSUs awarded) will vest quarterly beginning September 2022 and ending June 2025 and, with respect to Mr. Bell, subject to the continued employment requirement, four installments (25% of the RSUs awarded plus three quarterly installments of 1/16 of the RSUs awarded) will vest on August 2, 2022 (375 days after the closing of the Merger) and the remaining nine installments (each, 1/16 of the RSUs awarded) will vest quarterly beginning September 2022 and ending September 2024. The RSUs granted to Mr. Bach (which have a vesting commencement date of February 22, 2021) are generally scheduled to vest in sixteen quarterly installments over four years, with each installment representing 1/16th of the RSUs awarded, subject to (i) the successful closing of the Merger and meeting the minimum service period requirement of 375 days after such closing (i.e., continued employment until August 2, 2022) (at which time amounts that were scheduled to vest prior to such date will vest); and (ii) continued employment through

each applicable quarterly vesting date. Accordingly, subject to the continued employment requirement, the first five installments (5/16 of the RSUs awarded) will vest on August 2, 2022 (375 days after the closing of the Merger) and the remaining eleven installments of 1/16 of the RSUs awarded will vest quarterly beginning September 2022 and ending March 2025.

For a description of the treatment of the RSUs in the event of certain qualifying terminations of employment, see “Potential Payments under Termination or Change in Control” below.

Pre-Merger CEO Compensation

CEO Transaction Bonus

In recognition of Mr. Rawlinson’s efforts on the Merger, in March 2021, prior to the closing of the Merger, the Atieva Board approved a $2 million cash transaction bonus payable to Mr. Rawlinson, subject to: (i) the closing of the Merger, (ii) Mr. Rawlinson’s continued employment through the Closing Date and (iii) Mr. Rawlinson not giving notice of his intent to resign on or before the Closing Date. The transaction bonus was paid to Mr. Rawlinson in August 2021.

CEO Grant

In January 2021, before the Merger (i.e., before Lucid became a public company), the Atieva Board was considering the Merger transaction but Atieva had not yet signed a definitive merger agreement. At that time, in recognition of Mr. Rawlinson’s critical importance to the success of Atieva before and contingent upon a successful merger transaction, and in order to incentivize and align Mr. Rawlinson with our stockholders through and after a significant strategic transaction, the Atieva Committee, in consultation with its compensation consultant, approved a framework for a special equity grant to Mr. Rawlinson, which was to be subject to achievement of the following two distinct performance conditions:

■

Valuation of Company at Go-Public Event: Based on Atieva’s value upon taking the company public via SPAC merger, initial public offering or another method, the percentage of the award denominated as time-based vesting RSUs would increase. If the minimum valuation threshold was not attained, 100% of the award would be denominated as performance-based vesting restricted stock units, which would be earned based on market capitalization goals.

​

■

Growth in Market Capitalization: For the portion of the award that was not granted in RSUs as a result of the initial public valuation, the Atieva Committee determined a grant of performance-based vesting RSUs with goals tied to growth in valuation would be best aligned with stockholders.

​

Shortly after the signing of the Merger Agreement, in March 2021, the Atieva Board approved the final award (the “CEO Grant”) based on the equity valuation of Atieva in connection with the Merger Agreement of  $11.75 billion, which represented the highest level of achievement contemplated in the first performance condition above. Accordingly, at the time the CEO Grant was awarded, the Atieva Board determined that the award would be granted via a mix of time-based vesting RSUs (45% of the total award) and performance-based vesting RSUs (55% of the total award) as follows (the numbers of RSUs reflect adjustments made to our shares in connection with the Merger):

■

13,834,748 time-based vesting RSUs, subject to ratable vesting over four years (the “CEO Time-Based RSUs”). Subject to Mr. Rawlinson’s continued employment on each vesting date, the CEO Time-Based RSUs vest in sixteen equal quarterly installments beginning on December 5, 2021. For purposes of the CEO Time-Based RSUs, the vesting dates are March 5, June 5, September 5 and December 5 of each year.

​

■

16,024,411 performance-based RSUs, subject to vesting in five tranches with each tranche tied to the attainment of market capitalization goals over the course of a five-year performance period as outlined below (the “CEO Performance RSUs”).

​

In approving the award, the Atieva Board, with the assistance of its compensation consultant, reviewed competitive market data related to aggregate equity ownership for similarly situated CEOs in addition to design features of other pre-initial public offering or de-SPAC transaction performance-based CEO equity awards. The Atieva Board also considered the following key design objectives:

■

Competitive practices for CEO unvested long-term incentive holdings at this size and stage of a company;

​

■

Recognition of Mr. Rawlinson’s strategic and technical leadership and innovation over a long-term horizon;

​

■

Direct alignment between Mr. Rawlinson and our stockholders;

​

■

Incentivizing our CEO to continue growing stockholder value; and

​

■

Delivering a majority of CEO pay via performance-based equity incentives.

​

The award was structured so that meaningful value would only be realized upon the achievement of sustained and significant levels of stockholder value creation.

The Atieva Board identified three performance-based criteria when approving the grant:

1)

Successful merger completion, to receive the grant at all;

​

2)

Portion of the grant was based on merger value that was set at a threshold of  $7.3 billion valuation with maximum performance based on a valuation of  $11.5 billion or more; and

​

3)

Additional post-merger market cap growth performance criteria at 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, 6x of valuation.

​

As mentioned above, the CEO Performance RSUs vest in five tranches based on the achievement of market capitalization goals applicable to each tranche (the “Performance Goals”). Each tranche vests at higher multiples of the initial valuation of  $11.75 billion and only when the multiple associated with each vesting tranche is sustained over a rolling six-month period, subject to Mr. Rawlinson’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date. The six-month market capitalization is calculated based on (i) the volume weighted average trading price per share over any six-month period multiplied by (ii) the average of the total number of outstanding shares of Class A common stock reported in a public filing for the two most recently completed quarterly reporting periods. This measurement period was designed to reward Mr. Rawlinson only if a sustained growth in Lucid’s market capitalization is achieved.

The six-month market capitalization target for each tranche is as follows (the number of CEO Performance RSUs are adjusted to reflect the impact of the Merger):

(1)

Measured from the equity valuation of  $11.75 billion at the time of the Merger.

​

Any CEO Performance RSUs that do not vest within five years after the closing of the Merger (such period, the “Performance Period”) will be forfeited. Upon a termination without “cause” or upon a “constructive termination” ​(as each such term is defined in the CEO Grant award agreement), the CEO Performance RSUs will remain outstanding and eligible to vest upon attainment of the Performance Goals for six months (or the end of the Performance Period, if sooner) following such termination of employment, subject to Mr. Rawlinson’s execution of a release of claims.

In the event of a change in control of Lucid Group following the closing of the Merger, any unvested CEO Time-Based RSUs to the extent not assumed or substituted in connection with such change in control will vest subject to Mr. Rawlinson’s continued employment through the change in control or a termination without cause or constructive termination within thirty days prior to the change in control, subject to Mr. Rawlinson’s execution of a release of claims. If the CEO Time-Based RSUs are assumed or substituted in connection with the change in control, any unvested CEO Time-Based RSUs will vest if Mr. Rawlinson experiences a termination without cause or constructive termination within twelve months following the change in control. With respect to the CEO Performance RSUs, subject to Mr. Rawlinson’s continued service through the change in control, any unvested CEO

Performance RSUs will vest on the change in control to the extent the per share deal price exceeds the relevant market capitalization goal. In addition, upon a private financing or public offering of Lucid Group’s common stock with proceeds of at least $1 billion, if the price per share implied by the financing exceeds the relevant market capitalization goal, the CEO Performance RSUs associated with such goal will vest.

Other Compensation

Retirement

We maintain a 401(k) retirement savings plan for our employees in the United States, including the NEOs, who satisfy certain eligibility requirements. Our NEOs are eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan on the same terms as other full-time employees.

Employee Benefits and Perquisites

All of our full-time employees, including the NEOs, are eligible to participate in our health and welfare plans, including medical, dental and vision benefits, medical and dependent care flexible spending accounts and life insurance. We pay for executive disability insurance premiums for the NEOs in the amounts set forth in the Summary Compensation Table below. We do not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a significant component of our executive compensation program and do not provide material perquisites to our NEOs.

Series E Purchase

On April 2, 2021, certain employees of Atieva, including Mr. Rawlinson, Mr. Bach and Mr. Bell, as well as directors, purchased shares of Atieva, Inc. Series E Preferred Shares at a purchase price of  $7.90 per share (converted to a price of  $2.99 per share after the Merger). It was subsequently determined that the fair market value of Series E Preferred Shares on April 2, 2021, after conversion in the Merger, was actually $15.26 per share. The difference between the purchase price and the fair market value is treated as compensation for tax purposes and the difference is reported as “All Other Compensation” in the 2021 Summary Compensation Table.

In October 2021, in order to allow directors and employees, including Mr. Rawlinson, Mr. Bach and Mr. Bell, to satisfy certain tax obligations (including tax withholding obligations of the Company) with respect to the Series E Preferred Shares, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 857,825 shares of its common stock from certain individuals, including 178,796 shares from Mr. Rawlinson, 195,557 shares from Mr. Bach and 33,526 shares from Mr. Bell (such transactions, the “Repurchases”). The repurchase price was $24.15 per share, which was equal to the average closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market for the three-trading day period ending on and including October 6, 2021, the second trading day prior to the date of the Repurchases. The Company applied the proceeds received from the Repurchases to the applicable U.S. tax authorities to satisfy tax obligations.

Offer Letters & Employment Arrangements

Lucid entered into offer letters with Messrs. Rawlinson, Bach, Bell and Ms. House each of which provides for at-will employment and provides for no specified term of employment. Each of Ms. House’s and Mr. Bell’s offer letter provides for a $100,000 and $250,000 sign-on bonus, respectively, as described above and an initial grant of 250,000 and 500,000, respectively, RSUs. In addition, as a condition of their employment, each of the NEOs was required to sign a Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement (“Restrictive Covenant Agreement”) which includes, among other provisions, a 24-month post-employment non solicit of employees and customers, a perpetual confidentiality covenant and an assignment of inventions provision.

Termination and Change in Control Agreements

Each of our NEOs also participates in the Lucid Group, Inc. Executive Severance Benefit Plan (the “Executive Severance Plan”). Under the terms of the Executive Severance Plan, participants are entitled to receive the following in the event of a termination without “cause” or on a “constructive termination” ​(as each such term is defined in the Executive Severance Plan), subject to the participant’s execution of a release of claims: (i) a continuation of base salary for the number of months as set forth in the participant’s participation agreement, (ii) COBRA continuation premium payments for the number of months as set forth in the participant’s participation agreement, and (iii) accelerated vesting of a certain percentage of the participant’s outstanding equity awards (but accelerated vesting under the Executive Severance Plan does not apply to the CEO Grant, which contains its own terms relative to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances, as described above under “CEO Grant”).

In the event of a termination without “cause” or on a “constructive termination” within 3 months prior to or 12 months following a change in control (a “Change in Control Termination”), participants are entitled to receive the following, subject to the participant’s execution of a release of claims: (i) a continuation of base salary and bonus for the number of months as set forth in the participant’s participation agreement, (ii) COBRA continuation premium payments for the number of months as set forth in the participant’s participation agreement, and (iii) accelerated vesting of 100% of the participant’s outstanding equity awards.

Under the Executive Severance Plan, a participant’s right to receive severance benefits terminates in the event of the participant’s breach of the Restrictive Covenant Agreement or the participant utilizes our trade secrets to solicit employees to leave us or to induce any of our then-current clients, customers or suppliers to terminate their business relationship with us.

On September 15, 2021, our Compensation Committee approved the severance levels that apply to each of the NEOs under the Executive Severance Benefit Plan which are set forth in the table below.

Under the terms of the Lucid Group, Inc. Vesting Acceleration Policy for Death and Disability (the “Acceleration Policy”), which was approved by our Compensation Committee on September 15, 2021, our NEOs are also entitled to accelerated vesting of all outstanding unvested time-based and performance-based equity awards in the event of death or disability, except to the extent the policy would be inconsistent with the terms or provisions of any award agreement, employment agreement, or other plan or agreement. The Acceleration Policy also does not apply to any equity awards granted to Mr. Rawlinson prior to the date the Acceleration Policy was adopted (including the CEO Grant). Each NEO’s severance entitlements upon certain terminations of employment and/or a change in control are described in more detail below under “Potential Payments under Termination or Change in Control.”

Update on CEO Grant

In designing the CEO Grant, the Atieva Board set extremely challenging goals that incentivized Mr. Rawlinson towards the creation of significant stockholder value. As of the date of this filing, the awards and goals have been working as intended. From the time of the closing of the Merger through January 25, 2022 (the first possible measurement date for the vesting of the CEO Performance RSUs), our stock delivered a TSR of 32.65% resulting in the creation of  $61.9 billion of stockholder value from the initial Churchill transaction valuation of  $11.75 billion.

The closing of our SPAC transaction being on July 23, 2021 and the first trading day for the combined company of July 26, 2021 resulted in January 25, 2022 marking the first possible measurement for the potential vesting of the CEO Performance RSUs (i.e., six calendar months following the close of the Merger transaction).

As a result of the significant value created for our stockholders, in March 2022, the Board certified the achievement of the market capitalization milestones associated with the first four (of five) tranches of the CEO Performance RSUs (pursuant to the terms of the CEO Grant), leading to the vesting of an aggregate of 13,934,272 CEO Performance RSUs.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Code (Section 162(m)) generally imposes a $1 million cap on the federal income tax deduction for compensation paid to our “covered employees” during any fiscal year. While the Compensation Committee considers the deductibility of awards as one factor in determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee also looks at other

factors in making its decisions, and, in the exercise of its business judgment and in accordance with its compensation philosophy, the Compensation Committee retains the flexibility to award compensation even if the compensation is not deductible by us for tax purposes, and to modify compensation that was initially intended to be tax deductible if it determines such modifications are consistent with our business needs.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

The Compensation Committee takes accounting considerations into account in designing compensation plans and arrangements for our NEOs and other employees. We follow Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (FASB ASC Topic 718) for our stock-based compensation awards. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires us to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards based on the grant date “fair value” of these awards.

(1)

Amounts reflect the base salary in effect for each NEO during fiscal 2021. For additional information, see “Base Salaries” above. For Messrs. Rawlinson and Bach, amount includes retroactive salary increases on September 15, 2021, effective August 2, 2021, in the amounts of  $8,654 and 5,769, respectively. Mr. Bach’s base salary was previously increased to $400,000 (from $375,000) effective March 1, 2021 (prior to the Merger) in connection with his promotion from Vice President, Hardware Engineering to Senior Vice President, Product and Chief Engineer.

​

(2)

For each NEO, the amount includes the portion of the 2021 annual incentive that was paid above the level of actual achievement of the customary delivery in October 2021. For Mr. Rawlinson, the amount also includes a $2,000,000 bonus paid in connection with the closing the Merger (approved by the Atieva Board in March 2021) and $6,385.82 of vacation cashout. For Mr. Bach, the amount includes $4,998 of vacation cashout.

​

(3)

This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for the CEO Time-Based RSUs and the CEO Performance RSUs. The grant date fair value of the CEO Performance RSUs was calculated based on the expected value of the possible outcomes of the performance conditions related to these awards in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (excluding the effects of estimated forfeitures) and assumes that all CEO Performance RSUs will be earned during the term of the CEO Grant.

​

(4)

This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for the options granted to NEOs in 2020.

​

(5)

Amount includes the customer delivery component of the annual incentive plan earned based on achieving customer delivery in October 2021.

​

(6)

For Mr. Rawlinson, the amount includes: (i) $6,567,824, representing the difference in price paid in April 2021 for Series E convertible preferred shares in the fourth series E closing at $7.90 per share and the amount subsequently determined to be the fair market value of such shares on the date or purchase (the “Series E Difference Amount”), (ii) $780 of workplace communication reimbursement and (iii) $713 of executive disability insurance premiums. For Ms. House, the amount includes: (i) $510 of workplace communication reimbursement and (ii) $650 of executive disability insurance premiums. For Mr. Bach, amount includes, (i) $7,183,545, representing Mr. Bach’s Series E Difference Amount, (ii) $780 in workplace communication reimbursement and (iii) $608 of executive disability insurance premiums. For Mr. Bell, amount includes: (i) $1,231,466 representing Mr. Bell’s Series E Difference Amount, (ii) $780 in workplace communication reimbursement and (iii) $650 of executive disability insurance premiums.

​

(7)

Ms. House became our Chief Financial Officer upon the commencement of her employment on May 3, 2021.

​

(8)

Mr. Bell became employed by us in February 2021. In 2021, prior to Mr. Bell becoming an employee in February, Mr. Bell provided services to us through a workforce management company. Mr. Bell received $87,500 from such workforce management company for such services, which amount is included in the Salary column.

​

(1)

For Messrs. Rawlinson and Bach, amounts adjusted to reflect base salary increases as of August 2021.

​

(2)

Represents the grant date fair value of RSUs granted during 2021, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

​

(1)

The options vest in forty-eight (48) equal monthly installments beginning on April 1, 2020, subject to continued employment as of each applicable vesting date.

​

(2)

The RSUs vest in sixteen equal quarterly installments beginning on December 5, 2021, subject to continued employment as of each applicable vesting date.

​

(3)

The CEO Performance RSUs vest in five tranches based on the achievement of market capitalization goals applicable to each tranche over any six-month period subject to Mr. Rawlinson’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date, with the first 6-month vesting period ending in January 2022 (six months after closing of the Merger). The amount reported for the CEO Performance RSUs is the threshold number of shares. Amounts can be earned until 2025.

​

(4)

25% of the RSUs vest in August 2022 and 1/16 of the RSUs vest each quarter over twelve quarters beginning September 2022 and ending June 2025, subject to Ms. House’s continued employment as of each applicable vesting date.

​

(5)

5/16 of the RSUs vest in August 2022 and 1/16 of the RSUs vest each quarter over eleven quarters beginning September 2022 and ending March 2025, subject to Mr. Bach’s continued employment through each applicable vesting date.

​

(6)

25% of the RSUs plus three quarterly installments of 1/16 of the RSUs vest in August 2022 and 1/16 of the RSUs vest each quarter over nine quarters beginning in September 2022 and ending September 2024, subject to Mr. Bell’s continued employment as of each applicable vesting date.

​

(1)

Computed as the difference between the closing price of the underlying shares on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the options, and based on the following:

​

(2)

Computed as the aggregate dollar amount realized upon the vesting of CEO Time-Based RSUs, determined by multiplying the number of units by the closing price of our common stock on December 3, 2021, the trading prior to the vesting date of December 5, 2021.

​

(3)

Computed as the difference between the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the options, and based on the following:

​

(1)

Under the Acceleration Policy, except in the case of the CEO Time-Based RSUs and CEO Performance RSUs, upon the death or disability of an NEO on December 31, 2021, all of such NEO’s outstanding equity awards would have vested. In addition, the NEOs are eligible for executive short-term and long-term disability benefits in the amounts of  $3,000 per week and $15,000 per month, respectively.

​

(2)

Assuming a termination without cause or a constructive termination on December 31, 2021, the CEO Time-Based RSUs would have been forfeited, and the CEO Performance RSUs would have remained outstanding and eligible to vest upon attainment of the Performance Goals for six months following such termination of employment, after which time any remaining unvested CEO Performance RSUs would be forfeited. As discussed in “Update on CEO Grant,” Lucid achieved the 6-month market capitalization target associated with the first four (of five) vesting tranches of the CEO Performance RSUs as of January 25, 2022. As a result, at least the same number of CEO Performance RSUs that actually vested upon achieving those targets (13,934,272 CEO Performance RSUs) would have vested had Mr. Rawlinson’s employment been terminated without cause or due to constructive termination on December 31, 2021. In connection with such a termination, the final tranche of CEO Performance RSUs could have also vested to the extent the market capitalization target for the final tranche was achieved by June 30, 2022.

​

(3)

Represents the value of unvested CEO Time-Based RSUs as of December 31, 2021 (an aggregate of 12,970,078 RSUs) which would have vested upon a termination of employment without cause or upon constructive termination on such date, assuming a change in control occurred on such date. The value is based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2021 ($38.05). Separately, if a change in control of Lucid had occurred on December 31, 2021, then each CEO Performance RSU tranche would have vested to the extent the change in control value (the product of the number of our shares outstanding as of such date and the per share price received in the change in control) equaled or exceeded the 6-month market capitalization threshold applicable to such tranche. Assuming a per share price received in such a hypothetical change in control on December 31, 2021 equal to the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2021 ($38.05), the first four (of five) tranches of CEO Performance RSUs (an aggregate of 13,934,272 CEO Performance RSUs) would have vested as of such date, which is the same number of CEO Performance RSUs that actually vested based on achievement of the 6-month market capitalization thresholds applicable to such tranches.

​