This combined Form 10-Q represents separate filings by PNM Resources, Inc. and PNM. Information combined herein relating to an individual registrant is filed by that registrant on its own behalf. PNM makes no representations as to the information relating to PNM Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries other than PNM. When this combined Form 10-Q is incorporated by reference into any filing with the SEC made by PNM, the portions of this Form 10-Q that relate to PNM Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries other than PNM are not incorporated by reference therein. |
ii
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Page No. |
|
GLOSSARY |
1 |
|
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm................................. |
3 |
|
|
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
PNM Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004...................................... |
5 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.................................................. |
6 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004...................................... |
8 |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004...................................... |
10 |
Public Service Company of New Mexico and Subsidiaries |
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004...................................... |
11 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.................................................. |
12 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004...................................... |
14 |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004...................................... |
16 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements...................................................... |
17 |
|
|
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS....... |
53 |
|
|
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT |
|
MARKET RISK.................................................................................... |
96 |
|
|
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES...................................................... |
96 |
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS....................................................................... |
96 |
|
|
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION..................................................................... |
97 |
|
|
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS............................................................................................... |
99 |
|
|
Signature................................................................................................................... |
100 |
iii
GLOSSARY
Afton..................................... |
Afton Generating Station |
Albuquerque......................... |
City of Albuquerque, New Mexico |
ALJ........................................ |
Administrative Law Judge |
APS....................................... |
Arizona Public Service Company |
AR Securitization................. |
Accounts Receivable Securitization |
Board..................................... |
Board of Directors |
BTU....................................... |
British Thermal Unit |
Cal ISO.................................. |
California Independent System Operator |
Cascade................................. |
Cascade Investment, LLC |
Clean Air Act....................... |
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 |
Congress............................... |
United States Congress |
Decatherm............................ |
1,000,000 BTUs |
Delta...................................... |
Delta-Person Limited Partnership |
DOJ....................................... |
United States Department of Justice |
EIP......................................... |
Eastern Interconnection Project |
EPE........................................ |
El Paso Electric Company |
EPA....................................... |
United States Environmental Protection Agency |
ERCOT.................................. |
Electric Reliability Council of Texas |
FASB..................................... |
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC..................................... |
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
Four Corners......................... |
Four Corners Power Plant |
GAAP.................................... |
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United |
States of America |
|
Gathering Company............ |
Sunterra Gas Gathering Company, a wholly‑owned |
subsidiary of PNM Resources, Inc. |
|
GCT....................................... |
Grand Canyon Trust |
Global Electric Agreement... |
Signed by the Company and other parties in 2002; provided for a five-year rate path for New Mexico jurisdictional customers beginning in September 2003 |
Great Southwestern............. |
Great Southwestern Construction, Inc. |
Holding Company................ |
PNM Resources, Inc. |
IRS......................................... |
United States Internal Revenue Service |
LIBOR................................... |
London Interbank Offered Rate |
Lordsburg............................. |
Lordsburg Generating Station |
Luna...................................... |
Luna Energy Facility |
Moody's................................. |
Moody's Investor Services, Inc. |
MW....................................... |
Megawatt |
MWh..................................... |
Megawatt Hour |
Navajo Acts.......................... |
Navajo Nation Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act, the |
Navajo Nation Safe Drinking Water Act, and the Navajo |
|
Nation Pesticide Act |
|
Ninth Circuit........................ |
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
NMED................................... |
New Mexico Environment Department |
NMPRC................................. |
New Mexico Public Regulation Commission, successor to the NMPUC |
|
1
NMPUC................................ |
New Mexico Public Utility Commission |
NNHPD................................ |
Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department |
NRC...................................... |
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
NSPS..................................... |
New Source Performance Standards |
NSR....................................... |
New Source Review |
O&M..................................... |
Operations and Maintenance Expense |
PGAC.................................... |
PNM's Purchased Gas Adjustment Clause |
PG&E.................................... |
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. |
PNM...................................... |
Public Service Company of New Mexico |
PPA....................................... |
Power Purchase Agreement |
PSD....................................... |
Prevention of Significant Deterioration |
Processing Company............ |
Sunterra Gas Processing Company, a wholly‑owned |
subsidiary of PNM Resources, Inc. |
|
PUCT.................................... |
Public Utility Commission of Texas |
PUHCA................................. |
The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 |
PVNGS.................................. |
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station |
RMRR.................................... |
Routine Maintenance, Repair or Replacement |
RTO....................................... |
Regional Transmission Organization |
Reeves Station....................... |
Reeves Generating Station |
Restructuring Act................. |
New Mexico Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999, as amended |
RMC...................................... |
Risk Management Committee |
SCE........................................ |
Southern California Edison Company |
SDG&E.................................. |
San Diego Gas and Electric Company |
SEC........................................ |
United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
SESCO................................... |
San Angelo Electric Service Company |
SFAS..................................... |
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards |
SJCC...................................... |
San Juan Coal Company |
SJGS....................................... |
San Juan Generating Station |
S&P....................................... |
Standard and Poor's Ratings Services |
TCEQ.................................... |
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality |
TNMP.................................... |
Texas‑New Mexico Power Company |
TNP....................................... |
TNP Enterprises, Inc. |
Throughput.......................... |
Volumes of gas delivered, whether or not owned by the Company |
USBR..................................... |
United States Bureau of Reclamation |
USFS...................................... |
United States Forest Service |
VAR...................................... |
Value at Risk |
WSPP.................................... |
Western Systems Power Pool |
2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of PNM Resources, Inc.
Albuquerque, New Mexico
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of PNM Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income and of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. These interim consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such interim consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of capitalization (not presented herein) of PNM Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, retained earnings, comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 25, 2005 (which report includes explanatory paragraphs related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations , effective January 1, 2003 and the change in actuarial valuation measurement date for the pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plans from September 30 to December 31 during 2003), we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ DELOITEE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, California
May 2, 2005
3
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of Public Service Company of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Public Service Company of New Mexico and subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income and of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. These interim consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such interim consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of capitalization (not presented herein) of Public Service Company of New Mexico and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, retained earnings, comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 25, 2005 (which report includes explanatory paragraphs related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations , effective January 1, 2003 and the change in actuarial valuation measurement date for the pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plans from September 30 to December 31 during 2003), we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ DELOITEE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, California
May 2, 2005
4
5
6
7
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
|||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
|||
(Unaudited) |
|||
|
|||
Three Months Ended |
|||
March 31, |
|||
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
(In thousands) |
|||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|||
Net earnings |
$ 30,509 |
$ 24,778 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flows |
|||
from operating activities: |
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
36,275 |
34,726 |
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
(470) |
(95) |
|
Accumulated deferred income tax |
(639) |
(2,428) |
|
Net unrealized gains on trading and investment contracts |
(923) |
(1,760) |
|
Changes in certain assets and liabilities: |
|||
Accounts receivable |
12,595 |
(13,508) |
|
Unbilled revenues |
18,341 |
6,195 |
|
Accrued post-retirement benefit costs |
(2,007) |
(566) |
|
Other assets |
(652) |
28,920 |
|
Accounts payable |
(22,060) |
(12,522) |
|
Accrued interest and taxes |
44,129 |
27,685 |
|
Other liabilities |
(34,007) |
(27,177) |
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
81,091 |
64,248 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|||
Utility plant additions |
(28,072) |
(26,542) |
|
Nuclear fuel additions |
(1,303) |
(1,589) |
|
Utility plant additions related to allowance for borrowed funds used |
|||
during construction and capitalized interest |
(318) |
(738) |
|
Return of principal of PVNGS lessor notes |
9,998 |
10,274 |
|
Other |
(1,163) |
(4,828) |
|
Net cash flows from investing activities |
(20,858) |
(23,423) |
|
|
|||
8
9
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
|||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|||||||||
(Unaudited) |
|||||||||
Three Months Ended |
|||||||||
March 31, |
|||||||||
2005 |
|
2004 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Net Earnings |
$ 30,509 |
$ 24,778 |
|||||||
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax: |
|||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities: |
|||||||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) during the period, net of income tax (expense) |
|||||||||
benefit of $66 and $(308) |
(101) |
472 |
|||||||
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income, net of income |
|||||||||
tax (expense) benefit of $498 and $209 |
(760) |
(320) |
|||||||
Additional minimum pension liability adjustment, net of income tax (expense) |
|||||||||
benefit of $(12) |
- |
19 |
|||||||
Mark-to-market adjustment for certain derivative transactions: |
|||||||||
Change in fair market value of designated cash flow hedges, net of income tax |
|||||||||
(expense) benefit of $(2,070) and $(970) |
3,159 |
1,480 |
|||||||
Reclassification for amounts in net income, net of income tax (expense) |
|||||||||
benefit of $917 and $274 |
(1,399) |
(418) |
|||||||
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
899 |
1,233 |
|||||||
Total Comprehensive Income |
$ 31,408 |
$ 26,011 |
|||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
11
12
13
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO AND SUBSIDIARIES |
|||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
|||
(Unaudited) |
|||
|
|||
Three Months Ended |
|||
March 31, |
|||
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
(In thousands) |
|||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|||
Net earnings |
$ 32,486 |
$ 27,504 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flows |
|||
from operating activities: |
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
35,393 |
34,191 |
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
(470) |
(90) |
|
Accumulated deferred income tax |
(639) |
(2,428) |
|
Net unrealized gains on trading and investment contracts |
(923) |
(1,760) |
|
Changes in certain assets and liabilities: |
|||
Accounts receivable |
12,595 |
(13,508) |
|
Unbilled revenues |
18,341 |
6,195 |
|
Accrued post-retirement benefit costs |
(2,007) |
(566) |
|
Other assets |
4,522 |
20,814 |
|
Accounts payable |
(27,888) |
(14,202) |
|
Accrued interest and taxes |
20,061 |
28,562 |
|
Other liabilities |
(45,814) |
(18,140) |
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
45,657 |
66,572 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|||
Utility plant additions |
(23,368) |
(25,203) |
|
Nuclear fuel additions |
(1,303) |
(1,589) |
|
Utility plant additions related to allowance for borrowed funds used |
|||
during construction and capitalized interest |
(318) |
(662) |
|
Purchase of bond investments |
- |
(12,247) |
|
Return of principal of PVNGS lessor notes |
9,998 |
10,274 |
|
Other |
(1,570) |
(4,727) |
|
Net cash flows from investing activities |
(16,561) |
(34,154) |
|
|
|||
14
15
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO AND SUBSIDIARIES |
|||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|||||||||
(Unaudited) |
|||||||||
|
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|||||||
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Net Earnings |
$32,354 |
$27,357 |
|||||||
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax: |
|||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities: |
|||||||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) during the period, net of income tax (expense) |
|||||||||
benefit of $66 and $(308) |
(101) |
472 |
|||||||
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income, net of income |
|||||||||
tax (expense) benefit of $498 and $209 |
(760) |
(320) |
|||||||
Additional minimum pension liability adjustment, net of income tax expense |
|||||||||
of $(12) |
- |
19 |
|||||||
Mark-to-market adjustment for certain derivative transactions: |
|||||||||
Change in fair market value of designated cash flow hedges, net of income tax |
|||||||||
(expense) benefit of $(2,070) and $(970) |
3,159 |
1,480 |
|||||||
Reclassification for amounts in net income, net of income tax (expense) |
|||||||||
benefit of $917 and $274 |
(1,399) |
(418) |
|||||||
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
899 |
1,233 |
|||||||
Total Comprehensive Income |
$ 33,253 |
$ 28,590 |
|||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
16
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
(1) Accounting Policies and Responsibility for Financial Statements
In the opinion of the management of PNM Resources, Inc. (the "Holding Company") and Subsidiaries and Public Service Company of New Mexico and Subsidiaries ("PNM") (collectively, the "Company"), the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring accruals and adjustments which are necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the consolidated results of its operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. These consolidated financial statements are unaudited, and certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company's annual consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted, as permitted under the applicable rules and regulations. Readers of these financial statements should refer to the Company's audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2004 that are included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. The results of operations presented in the accompanying financial statements are not necessarily representative of operations for an entire year.
Presentation
The Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto for the Holding Company and Subsidiaries and PNM are presented on a combined basis. The business of PNM constitutes substantially all of the business of the Company. Therefore, the results of operations of PNM are virtually identical to the consolidated results of the Holding Company and all of its subsidiaries. For discussion purposes, this report will use the term "Company" when discussing matters of common applicability to the Holding Company and Subsidiaries and PNM. Readers of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto should assume that the information presented applies to consolidated results of operations of both the Holding Company and its subsidiaries, including PNM, except where the context or references clearly indicate otherwise. Discussions regarding specific contractual obligations generally reference the company that is legally obligated. In the case of contractual obligations of PNM, these obligations are consolidated with the Holding Company and its subsidiaries under GAAP. Broader operational discussions refer to the Company.
The Holding Company was established as the holding company in 2001. On December 30, 2004, PNM Resources became a registered holding company under PUHCA. As a result of the requirement to register as a holding company, PNM Resources created PNMR Services Company, a wholly-owned services company, which began operation on January 1, 2005.
The Holding Company performed substantially all of the corporate activities of PNM from 2001 to 2004. These activities were billed to PNM on a cost basis to the extent they were for the corporate management of PNM and were allocated to the operating segments. The services functions previously performed by the Holding Company were assumed by PNMR Services Company effective January 1, 2005.
17
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Certain amounts in the 2004 Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 financial statement presentation.
Decommissioning Costs
Accounting for decommissioning costs for nuclear and fossil-fuel generation involves significant estimates related to costs to be incurred many years in the future after plant closure. Changes in these estimates could significantly impact the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Company owns and leases nuclear and fossil-fuel facilities that are within and outside of its retail service areas. The Company adopted the accounting requirements of SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" ( " SFAS 143 " ), on January 1, 2003. Under SFAS 143, the Company is only required to recognize and measure decommissioning liabilities for tangible long-lived assets for which a legal obligation exists. Adoption of the statement changed the Company's method of accounting for both nuclear generation decommissioning and fossil-fuel generation decommissioning. Nuclear decommissioning costs are based on site-specific estimates of the costs for removing all radioactive and other structures at the site. PVNGS Unit 3 is currently excluded from the Company's retail rates while PVNGS Units 1 and 2 are included in the Company's retail rates. The Company collects a provision for ultimate decommissioning of PVNGS Units 1 and 2 in its rates and recognizes a corresponding expense and liability for these amounts. Fossil-fuel decommissioning costs are also approved by the NMPRC as a component of the Company's depreciation rates. The Company believes that it will continue to be able to collect in rates for its legal asset retirement obligations for nuclear and fossil-fuel generation activities included in the ratemaking process.
In addition, the Company has a contractual obligation with the PVNGS participants to fund separately the nuclear decommissioning at a level in excess of what the Company has identified as its legal asset retirement obligation under SFAS 143. The contractual funding obligation is based on a site-specific estimate prepared by a third party. The Company's most recent site-specific estimates for nuclear decommissioning costs were developed in 2001, using 2001 cost factors, and are based on prompt dismantlement decommissioning, reflecting the costs of removal discussed above, with such removal occurring shortly after operating license expiration. The Company's share of the contractual funding obligation through the end of the licensing terms is approximately $201.0 million (measured in 2001 dollars). The estimates are subject to change based on a variety of factors, including cost escalation, changes in technology applicable to nuclear decommissioning and changes in federal, state or local regulations. The operating licenses for PVNGS Units 1, 2 and 3 will expire in 2025, 2026, and 2027, respectively. The Company does not have a similar contractual funding obligation related to its fossil-fuel plants.
Stock Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, " Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees " ("APB 25"). Compensation cost for stock options, if any, is measured as the excess
18
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
of the quoted market price of the Company's stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the granted stock option. Restricted stock is recorded as compensation cost over the requisite vesting periods based on the market value on the date of grant.
At March 31, 2005, the Company had three stock-based employee compensation plans. Stock options continue to be granted under only two of the plans. Had compensation expense for the Company's stock options been recognized based on the fair value on the grant date under the methodology prescribed by SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"), the effect on the Company's pro forma net earnings and pro forma earnings per share would be as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Three Months Ended | |||
March 31, | |||
2005 | 2004 | ||
Net earnings |
$ 30,509 |
$ 24,778 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee |
|||
compensation expense determined |
|||
under fair value based method for all |
|||
awards, net of related tax effects |
(347) |
(704) |
|
Pro forma net earnings |
$ 30,162 |
$ 24,074 |
|
Earnings per share: |
|||
Basic - as reported |
$ 0.50 |
$ 0.41 |
|
Basic - pro forma |
$ 0.50 |
$ 0.40 |
|
Diluted - as reported |
$ 0.50 |
$ 0.41 |
|
Diluted - pro forma |
$ 0.49 |
$ 0.39 |
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share Based Payment" ("SFAS 123R") supersedes APB 25. SFAS 123R requires the recognition of compensation expense, over the requisite service period, in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments granted to employees. The fair value of the share-based payment, excluding liability awards, is computed at the date of grant and will not be remeasured. The fair value of liability awards will be remeasured at each reporting date through the settlement date with the change in fair value recognized as compensation expense over that period. SFAS 123R applies to all transactions involving the issuance, by a company, of its own equity in exchange for goods or services. SFAS 123R does not change the accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in SFAS 123 as originally issued and EITF Issue No. 96-18, "Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services". SFAS 123R will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2006. For options issued on or prior to December 31, 2005, the Company expects that the effect of SFAS 123R on the Company's results of operations will not
19
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
be materially different from the pro forma amounts presented in the table above for the applicable time period. The Company anticipates that the calculation of the fair value of any options issued after December 31, 2005 will not be materially different from the fair value estimated in the pro forma amounts presented in the table above.
(2) Segment Information
The Holding Company is an investor-owned holding company of energy and energy related businesses. Its principal subsidiary, PNM, is an integrated public utility primarily engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity; transmission, distribution and sale of natural gas within the State of New Mexico; and the sale and marketing of electricity in the Western United States. In addition, the Holding Company provides energy and technology related services through its wholly owned subsidiary, Avistar, Inc.
As it currently operates, the Company's principal business segments, whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Company's management, are Utility Operations and Wholesale Operations. Utility Operations include Electric Services, Gas Services and Transmission Services.
The following segment presentation is based on the methodology that the Company's management uses for making operating decisions and assessing performance of its various business activities. As such, the following presentation reports operating results without regard to the effect of accounting or regulatory changes and similar one-time items not related to normal operations.
In addition, adjustments related to EITF Issue 02-03, " Issues Related to Accounting for Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities ", and 03-11, " Reporting Realized Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments that are subject to FASB statement No. 133 and Not Held for Trading Purposes ", are included in Corporate and Other. These accounting pronouncements require a net presentation of trading gains and losses and realized gains and loss for certain non-trading derivatives. Management evaluates wholesale operations on a gross presentation basis due to its primarily net asset-backed marketing strategy and the importance it places on the Company's ability to repurchase and remarket previously sold capacity.
UTILITY OPERATIONS
Electric
Electric consists of the distribution and generation of electricity for retail electric customers in New Mexico. The Company provides retail electric service to a large area of north central New Mexico, including the cities of Albuquerque and Santa Fe, and certain other areas of New Mexico. Customer rates for retail electric service are set by the NMPRC based on the provisions of the Global Electric Agreement.
20
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Gas
Gas distributes natural gas to most of the major communities in New Mexico, including two of New Mexico's three largest metropolitan areas, Albuquerque and Santa Fe. The Company's customer base includes both sales-service customers and transportation-service customers. PNM purchases natural gas in the open market and resells it at cost to its distribution customers. As a result, increases or decreases in gas revenues resulting from wholesale gas price fluctuations do not impact the Company's consolidated gross margin or earnings.
Transmission
The Company owns or leases transmission lines, interconnected with other utilities in New Mexico and south and east into Texas, west into Arizona, and north into Colorado and Utah. Transmission revenues consist of sales to third parties as well as to Electric and Wholesale.
WHOLESALE OPERATIONS
Wholesale consists of the generation and sale of electricity into the wholesale market based on three product lines that include long-term contracts, forward sales and short-term sales. The source of these sales is supply created by selling the unused capacity of jurisdictional assets as well as the capacity of the Company's wholesale plants excluded from retail rates. Both regulated and unregulated generation is jointly dispatched in order to improve reliability, provide the most economic power to retail customers and maximize profits on any wholesale transactions.
Long-term contracts include sales to firm-requirements and other wholesale customers with multi-year arrangements. Forward sales include third party purchases in the forward market that range from 1 month to 3 years. These transactions do not qualify as normal sales and purchases as defined in SFAS 133, and thus are generally marked to market. Short-term sales generally include spot market, hour ahead, day ahead and week ahead contracts with terms of 30 days or less. Also included in short-term sales are sales of any excess generation not required to fulfill PNM's retail load and contractual commitments. Short-term sales also cover the revenue credit to retail customers as specified in the Global Electric Agreement.
CORPORATE AND OTHER
On December 30, 2004, the Holding Company became a registered holding company under PUHCA. As a result of the requirement to register as a holding company, the Holding Company created PNMR Services Company, a services company, which began operation on January 1, 2005, subject to final approval of a services company application filed with the SEC in January 2005.
21
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Summarized financial information by business segment for the three months ended March 31, 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
Electric |
|
Gas |
|
Transmission |
|
Wholesale |
|
& Other |
|
Consolidated |
|
2005: |
|||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
$ 129,718 |
$ 165,286 |
$ 4,464 |
$ 132,004 |
$ (1,815) |
(a) |
$ 429,657 |
||||
Intersegment revenues |
- |
- |
7,877 |
- |
(7,877) |
- |
|||||
Total revenues |
129,718 |
165,286 |
12,341 |
132,004 |
(9,692) |
429,657 |
|||||
Less: Cost of energy |
53,251 |
114,435 |
2,029 |
89,312 |
(9,863) |
(a) |
249,164 |
||||
Intersegment energy transfer |
(14,123) |
- |
- |
14,123 |
- |
- |
|||||
Gross margin |
90,590 |
50,851 |
10,312 |
28,569 |
171 |
180,493 |
|||||
Operating expenses |
57,521 |
24,094 |
5,582 |
10,888 |
1,987 |
100,072 |
|||||
Depreciation and amortization |
14,770 |
5,576 |
2,788 |
3,987 |
1,706 |
28,827 |
|||||
Income taxes |
4,425 |
7,228 |
167 |
3,831 |
(1,875) |
13,776 |
|||||
Operating income |
13,874 |
13,953 |
1,775 |
9,863 |
(1,647) |
37,818 |
|||||
Interest Income |
6,807 |
756 |
409 |
1,344 |
454 |
9,770 |
|||||
Other income/(deductions) |
254 |
81 |
68 |
933 |
(1,335) |
1 |
|||||
Other income taxes |
2,795 |
332 |
189 |
901 |
(718) |
3,499 |
|||||
Net interest charges |
7,122 |
2,924 |
1,520 |
4,016 |
(2,001) |
13,581 |
|||||
Segment net income (loss) |
$ 11,018 |
$ 11,534 |
$ 543 |
$ 7,223 |
$ 191 |
$ 30,509 |
|||||
Total assets |
$ 1,473,106 |
$ 536,588 |
$296,605 |
$ 446,645 |
$1,023,526 |
$3,776,470 |
|||||
Gross property additions |
$ 12,265 |
$ 8,946 |
$ 2,359 |
$ 3,667 |
$ 2,456 |
$ 29,693 |
(a) Includes EITF 03-11 impact, under which wholesale revenues and the associated cost of energy of $2.1 million are reclassified to a net margin basis in accordance with GAAP.
22
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Summarized financial information by business segment for the three months ended March 31, 2004 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
Electric |
|
Gas |
|
Transmission |
|
Wholesale |
|
& Other |
|
Consolidated |
|
2004: |
|||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
$ 130,036 |
$ 175,874 |
$ 4,414 |
$ 127,491 |
$ (443) |
(a) |
$ 437,372 |
||||
Intersegment revenues |
- |
- |
7,896 |
- |
(7,896) |
- |
|||||
Total revenues |
130,036 |
175,874 |
12,310 |
127,491 |
(8,339) |
437,372 |
|||||
Less: Cost of energy |
51,637 |
129,148 |
1,356 |
89,866 |
(8,521) |
(a) |
263,486 |
||||
Intersegment energy transfer |
(13,413) |
- |
- |
13,413 |
- |
- |
|||||
Gross margin |
91,812 |
46,726 |
10,954 |
24,212 |
182 |
173,886 |
|||||
Operating expenses |
59,618 |
24,579 |
5,169 |
11,248 |
2,290 |
102,904 |
|||||
Depreciation and amortization |
13,970 |
4,729 |
2,708 |
3,754 |
976 |
26,137 |
|||||
Income taxes |
4,353 |
5,812 |
634 |
2,302 |
(1,790) |
11,311 |
|||||
Operating income |
13,871 |
11,606 |
2,443 |
6,908 |
(1,294) |
33,534 |
|||||
Interest Income |
6,841 |
939 |
106 |
1,388 |
647 |
9,921 |
|||||
Other income/(deductions) |
100 |
(68) |
28 |
435 |
(2,347) |
(1,852) |
|||||
Other income taxes |
2,748 |
345 |
53 |
722 |
(872) |
2,996 |
|||||
Net interest charges |
7,228 |
2,739 |
1,477 |
3,394 |
(1,009) |
13,829 |
|||||
Segment net income (loss) |
$ 10,836 |
$ 9,393 |
$ 1,047 |
$ 4,615 |
$ (1,113) |
$ 24,778 |
|||||
Total assets |
$1,466,783 |
$ 512,538 |
$ 297,249 |
$ 430,493 |
$ 780,572 |
$3,487,635 |
|||||
Gross property additions |
$ 13,634 |
$ 6,241 |
$ 4,272 |
$ 2,799 |
$ 1,923 |
$ 28,869 |
(a) Includes EITF 03-11 impact, under which wholesale revenues and the associated cost of energy of $0.6 million are reclassified to a net margin basis in accordance with GAAP.
23
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(3) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Retail Natural Gas Contracts
Pursuant to a 1997 order issued by the NMPRC, the Company is authorized to hedge certain portions of natural gas supply contracts to protect the Company's natural gas customers from the risk of adverse price fluctuations in the natural gas market. Hedge gains and losses are recoverable through the Company's PGAC if deemed prudently incurred by the NMPRC. As a result, earnings are not affected by gains or losses generated by these instruments.
PNM did not purchase any natural gas options in the first three months of 2005.
Wholesale Electricity Contracts
The Company's Wholesale Operations have entered into various forward physical contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity with the intent to optimize its net generation position. These contracts, which are derivatives, do not qualify for normal purchase and sale designation pursuant to GAAP, and are marked to market.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company's Wholesale Operations settled derivative forward contracts for the sale of electricity that generated $37.9 million of electric revenues by delivering 0.8 million MWh. The Company settled derivative forward contracts for the purchase of electricity of $28.1 million or 0.6 million MWh to support these contractual sales and other open market sales opportunities. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company's Wholesale Operations settled derivative forward contracts for the sale of electricity that generated $27.0 million of electric revenues by delivering 0.6 million MWh. The Company settled derivative forward contracts for the purchase of electricity of $24.7 million or 0.6 million MWh to support these contractual sales.
As of March 31, 2005, the Company had open derivative forward contract positions to buy $37.2 million and to sell $56.3 million of electricity. At March 31, 2005, the Company had a gross mark-to-market gain (asset position) on these derivative forward contracts of $9.8 million and a gross mark-to-market loss (liability position) of $8.3 million, recorded in other assets and liabilities, respectively. The change in mark-to-market valuation is recognized in earnings each period and is recorded in operating revenues and cost of energy as applicable.
The Company's Wholesale Operations also entered into forward physical contracts for the sale of the Company's electric capacity in excess of its retail and wholesale firm requirement needs, including reserves. In addition, the Company entered into forward physical contracts for the purchase of retail needs, including reserves, when resource shortfalls exist. The Company generally accounts for these as normal sales and purchases as defined by SFAS 133, as amended. From time to time the Company makes forward purchases to serve its retail needs when the cost of purchased power is less than the incremental cost of its generation. At March 31, 2005, the Company had open forward positions classified as normal sales of electricity of
24
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
$120.7 million and normal purchases of electricity of $54.9 million, which will be reflected in the financial statements upon physical delivery.
The Company's Wholesale Operations, including both firm commitments and other wholesale sale activities, are managed primarily through a net asset-backed strategy, whereby the Company's aggregate net open position is covered by its own excess generation capabilities. The Company is exposed to market risk if its generation capabilities were disrupted or if its retail load requirements were greater than anticipated. If the Company were required to cover all or a portion of its net open contract position, it would have to meet its commitments through market purchases.
The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance or non-payment by counterparties of its financial and physical derivative instruments. The Company uses a credit management process to assess and monitor the financial conditions of counterparties. The Company's credit risk with its largest counterparty as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was $39.3 million and $26.2 million, respectively.
Wholesale Gas Contracts
Beginning in the second quarter of 2004, the Company's Wholesale Operations entered into various forward contracts for the purchase of gas with the intent to optimize its net generation position. These contracts, which are derivatives, do not qualify for normal purchase and sale designation pursuant to GAAP, and are marked to market.
As of March 31, 2005, the Company had open derivative forward contract positions to sell $26.3 million of gas. At March 31, 2005, the Company had a gross mark-to-market gain (asset position) on these derivative forward contracts of $4.7 million and a gross mark-to-market loss (liability position) of $3.2 million, recorded in other current assets and liabilities, respectively. The change in mark-to-market valuation is recognized in earnings each period and is recorded in operating revenues and cost of energy as applicable.
25
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) Earnings Per Share
In accordance with SFAS No. 128, " Earnings per Share" ("SFAS 128"), dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share has been presented in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The following reconciliation illustrates the impact on the share amounts of potential common shares and the earnings per share amounts:
|
Three Months Ended |
|||||||||
|
March 31, |
|||||||||
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||
Basic: |
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Net Earnings |
$ 30,509 |
$ 24,778 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding |
60,551 |
60,389 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||
Net Earnings per Share of Common Stock (Basic) |
$ 0.50 |
$ 0.41 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted: |
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Net Earnings |
$ 30,509 |
$ 24,778 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding |
60,551 |
60,389 |
|
|||||||
Dilutive Effect of Common Stock Equivalents (a) |
958 |
738 |
|
|||||||
Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding |
61,509 |
61,127 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||
Net Earnings per Share of Common Stock (Diluted) |
$ 0.50 |
$ 0.41 |
|
|||||||
(a) Excludes the effect of average anti-dilutive common stock equivalents related to out-of-the-money options of 38,844 and 423,336 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
(5) Capitalization
Stock Split
On May 18, 2004, the Company's Board of Directors approved a 3-for-2 stock split that took place on June 11, 2004 for shareholders of record on June 1, 2004. The split increased the number of outstanding common shares by 20,134,648 shares, from 40,269,296 to 60,403,944. All references in the accompanying consolidated financial statements to numbers of shares outstanding and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the stock split.
Revolving and Other Credit Facilities
At March 31, 2005, the Holding Company had a $400.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, the Holding Company Facility, with an expiration date of November 15, 2009. At March 31, 2005, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Holding Company Facility. At March 31, 2005, the Holding Company also had $15.0 million in local lines of credit. There were no outstanding borrowings under the local lines of credit at March 31, 2005.
26
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
At March 31, 2005, PNM had a $300.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, the PNM Facility, with an expiration date of November 21, 2006. At March 31, 2005, there were no outstanding borrowings under the PNM Facility. At March 31, 2005, PNM also had $23.5 million in local lines of credit and a $20.0 million borrowing arrangement with the Holding Company. There were no outstanding borrowings under the local lines of credit or the Holding Company borrowing arrangement at March 31, 2005.
PNM has a commercial paper program under which PNM may issue up to $300.0 million in commercial paper for up to 365 days. The commercial paper is unsecured and the proceeds are used for short-term cash management needs. The PNM Facility serves as a backstop for the outstanding commercial paper.
Financing Activities
The Holding Company has two universal shelf registration statements filed with the SEC for the issuance of debt securities and equity securities, preferred stock, purchase contracts, purchase contract units and warrants. As of March 31, 2005, the Holding Company had approximately $400.9 million of remaining unissued securities under these registration statements. In addition, as of March 31, 2005, PNM had approximately $200.0 million of remaining unissued securities registered under its previously filed shelf registration statement.
Effective January 1, 2005, the Holding Company entered into a $50.0 million loan agreement with PNMR Services Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary. In addition, the Holding Company made a $5.0 million equity contribution to PNMR Services Company in January 2005. These steps were taken to provide PNMR Services Company with liquidity for its operations.
The Holding Company has entered into three fixed to floating interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional principal amount of $150.0 million. Under these swaps, the Holding Company receives a 4.40% fixed interest payment on the notional principal amount on a semi-annual basis and pays a floating rate equal to the six month LIBOR plus 58.15 basis points (0.5815%) on the notional amount through September 15, 2008. The initial floating rate was 1.91% and will be reset every six months. The floating rate was reset on March 15, 2005, to 3.84%. The swap is accounted for as a fair-value hedge with a fair-market value (liability position) of approximately $3.1 million as of March 31, 2005.
Common Stock Offering
On March 30, 2005, the Company issued 3,910,000 shares of its common stock at $26.76 per share. The Company received net proceeds from this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses, of approximately $101.0 million. The Company plans to use the net proceeds to retire high cost TNP debt and preferred stock (see Note 11 - "Proposed TNP Acquisition"), to complete the construction of Luna, a partially
27
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
constructed, combined-cycle power plant near Deming, New Mexico and for other general corporate purposes. Pending the acquisition and construction activities, the Company invested the net proceeds in investment grade, interest-bearing securities. At March 31, 2005, these net proceeds and the proceeds from the "Equity Unit Offering" discussed below, are included in "Cash and cash equivalents" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet of the Holding Company.
Equity Unit Offering
In March 2005, the Company completed a public offering of 4,945,000 6.75% equity units ("Equity Units"), yielding net proceeds after fees of $239.6 million. The Company plans to use the net proceeds to retire high cost TNP debt and preferred stock in connection with the proposed TNP acquisition, to complete the construction of Luna and for other general corporate purposes. Pending the acquisition and construction activities, the Company invested the net proceeds in investment grade, interest-bearing securities.
Each Equity Unit consists of a purchase contract and a 5.0% undivided beneficial ownership interest in one of the Company's senior notes with a stated amount of $1,000, which corresponds to a $50 stated amount of the Company's senior notes. The ownership interest in the senior notes is initially pledged to secure the Corporate Unit holder's obligation to purchase Company common stock under the related purchase contract. The senior notes are scheduled to mature in May 2010 (subject to the remarketing described below) and bear interest at a rate of 4.8% per year. The purchase contracts entitle their holders to contract adjustment payments of 1.95% per year on the stated amount of $50.
Each purchase contract obligates the holder to purchase, and the Company to sell, at a purchase price of $50 in cash, shares of the Company's common stock on or before May 16, 2008 (the "Purchase Contract Settlement Date"). Generally, the number of shares each holder of the Equity Units is obligated to purchase depends on the average closing price per share of the Company's common stock over a 20-day trading period ending on the third trading day immediately preceding the Purchase Contract Settlement Date subject to anti-dilution adjustments. If the average closing price for the 20-day trading period is equal to or greater than approximately $32.65 per share, the settlement rate will be 1.5315 shares of common stock. If the average closing price for the trading period is less than approximately $32.65 per share but greater than $26.76 per share, the settlement rate is equal to $50 divided by the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the trading period. If the average closing price for the trading period is less than or equal to $26.76 per share, the settlement rate will be 1.8685 shares of common stock. The holders of Equity Units have the option to settle their obligations under the purchase contracts at any time on or prior to the seventh business day immediately preceding the Purchase Contract Settlement Date. Prior to the Purchase Contract Settlement Date, the senior notes will be remarketed. If the remarketing is successful, the interest rate on the senior notes may change to a rate selected by the remarketing agent, and the maturity of the senior notes may be extended to a date selected by the Company, but no later than May 2038. If the remarketing of the senior notes is not successful, the maturity and interest rate of the senior notes will not change and holders of the Equity Units will have the option of putting their senior notes to the Company to satisfy their obligations under the purchase contracts.
28
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The purchase contracts are forward transactions in the Company's common stock. Upon issuance, a liability for the present value of the purchase contract adjustment payments of $13.9 million was recorded as a reduction to stockholders' equity, with an offsetting increase to other long-term liabilities. Subsequent contract adjustment payments will reduce this liability. Upon settlement of each purchase contract, the Company will receive the stated amount of $50 on the purchase contract and will issue the requisite number of shares of common stock. The stated amount received will be recorded as an increase to stockholders' equity. The Company has reserved 10 million shares of its common stock for issuance pursuant to the purchase contracts.
Before the issuance of common stock upon settlement of the purchase contracts, the Equity Units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by SFAS 128. Under this method, the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share (based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period) is deemed to be increased by the excess, if any, of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the Company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement. Therefore, dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the Company's common stock for the reporting period is above approximately $32.65, and will potentially occur when the average price of the Company's common stock for the 20-day trading period preceding the end of the reporting period is lower than the average price of the Company's common stock for the full reporting period. There was no dilution in the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
29
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(6) Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The Company and its subsidiaries maintain a qualified defined benefit pension plan ("Pension Plan"), a plan providing medical and dental benefits to eligible retirees ("Other Postretirement Benefits Plan"), and an Executive Retirement Program. The following table shows the net periodic benefit cost or income of the Company's Pension Plan, Other Postretirement Benefits Plan, and Executive Retirement Program:
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
Pension Plan |
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefits |
|
Executive Retirement Program |
|||||||
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
(In thousands) |
|||||||||||
Components of Net Periodic | |||||||||||
Benefit Cost/(Income) | |||||||||||
Service cost |
$ 477 |
$ 1,085 |
$ 645 |
$ 601 |
$ 16 |
$ 26 |
|||||
Interest cost |
7,567 |
7,340 |
1,648 |
1,826 |
295 |
310 |
|||||
Expected return on assets |
(10,042) |
(9,843) |
(1,318) |
(1,232) |
- |
- |
|||||
Transition obligation |
- |
- |
- |
454 |
- |
- |
|||||
Prior service cost amortization |
79 |
79 |
(1,702) |
(1,049) |
34 |
37 |
|||||
Net loss amortization |
892 |
1,157 |
1,490 |
1,234 |
43 |
33 |
|||||
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Income) |
$ (1,027) |
$ (182) |
$ 763 |
$ 1,834 |
$ 388 |
$ 406 |
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 the Company contributed approximately $1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively, to trusts for the Other Postretirement Benefits. The Company expects to make contributions totaling $6.2 million to trusts for Other Postretirement Benefits during 2005. The Company does not anticipate making any contributions to the Pension Plan during 2005.
(7) Commitments and Contingencies
Global Electric Agreement
The Global Electric Agreement was signed in 2003. The Global Electric Agreement provided for the repeal of a majority of the Restructuring Act, a fixed rate path, procedures for the Company's participation in unregulated generating plant activities and other regulatory issues. The rate path is effective through December 31, 2007, at which time rates are subject to review by the NMPRC. Based on the normal time frame for rate proceedings in New Mexico of 10 months, a change in rates would not happen until late 2008. As a result of the repeal of the Restructuring Act, PNM re-applied the accounting requirements of SFAS 71, as amended, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation," to its regulated generation activities.
30
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
PVNGS Liability and Insurance Matters
The PVNGS participants have financial protection for public liability resulting from nuclear energy hazards to the full limit of liability under federal law. This potential liability is covered by primary liability insurance provided by commercial insurance carriers in the amount of $300.0 million and the balance by an industry‑wide retrospective assessment program. If losses at any nuclear power plant covered by the programs exceed the primary liability insurance limit, the Company could be assessed retrospective adjustments. The maximum assessment per reactor under the program for each nuclear incident is approximately $101.0 million. The retrospective assessment is subject to an annual limit of $10.0 million per reactor per incident. Based upon the Company's 10.2% interest in the three PVNGS units, the Company's maximum potential assessment per incident for all three units is approximately $31.0 million, with an annual payment limitation of approximately $3.0 million per incident. If the funds provided by this retrospective assessment program prove to be insufficient, Congress could impose revenue-raising measures on the nuclear industry to pay claims.
Possible Price-Anderson Act Changes
Versions of comprehensive energy bills proposed for adoption by Congress contain provisions that would amend the Price-Anderson Act, addressing public liability from nuclear energy hazards in ways that would increase the annual limit on retrospective assessments (see "PVNGS Liability and Insurance Matters" above) from $10.0 million to $15.0 million per reactor per incident with the Company's annual exposure per incident increasing from $3.0 million to $4.5 million.
The Company believes that such changes in applicable law, if enacted, would not result in a "deemed loss event" being declared by the equity investors in respect of the Company's sale and leaseback transactions of PVNGS Units 1 and 2.
Water Supply
Because of New Mexico's arid climate and current drought conditions, there is a growing concern in New Mexico about the use of water for power plants. The availability of sufficient water supplies to meet all the needs of the state, including growth, is a major issue. The Company has secured water rights in connection with the Afton and Lordsburg plants and water availability does not appear to be an issue for these plants at this time.
The Four Corners region, in which SJGS and Four Corners are located, experienced drought conditions during 2002 through 2004 that could have affected the water supply for the Company's generation plants. While snow conditions appear very favorable to date in 2005, in future years, if adequate precipitation is not received in the watershed that supplies the Four Corners region, the plants could be impacted. Consequently, PNM, APS and BHP Billiton have undertaken activities to secure additional water supplies for SJGS, Four Corners and related mines. The USBR has been requested to approve two supplemental contracts, one with the Jicarilla Apache Nation, PNM, and BHP Billiton for the SJGS and a second contract with the Jicarilla
31
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Apache Nation, APS and BHP Billiton for Four Corners, for a one-year term ending December 31, 2005. Environmental approvals will also need to be obtained for the supplemental contracts. PNM has also negotiated a voluntary shortage sharing agreement with tribes and other water users in the San Juan Basin for a one-year term ending December 31, 2005. Approvals of the signatory parties and environmental approvals for that agreement will need to be obtained. Similar agreements were entered into in 2003 and 2004. Although the Company does not believe that its operations will be materially affected by the drought conditions at this time, it cannot forecast the weather situation or its ramifications, or how regulations and legislation may impact the Company's situation in the future, should the drought continue.
Conflicts at San Juan Mine Involving Oil and Gas Leaseholders
The SJCC, through leases with the federal government and the State of New Mexico, owns coal interests with respect to an underground mine. Certain gas producers have leases in the area of the underground coal mine and have asserted claims against SJCC that its coal mining activities are interfering with gas production in the San Juan area. The Company understands that discussions with gas leaseholders are ongoing, although no formal litigation has been filed. The Company is unable to predict the outcome of this matter.
Navajo Nation Environmental Issues
Four Corners is located on the Navajo Reservation and is held under an easement granted by the federal government as well as a lease from the Navajo Nation. APS is the Four Corners operating agent and PNM owns a 13% ownership interest in Units 4 and 5 of Four Corners.
In July 1995, the Navajo Nation enacted the Navajo Acts. The Navajo Acts purport to give the Navajo Nation EPA authority to promulgate regulations covering air quality, drinking water, and pesticide activities, including those activities that occur at Four Corners. On October 17, 1995, the Four Corners participants filed a lawsuit in the District Court of the Navajo Nation, Window Rock District, challenging the applicability of the Navajo Acts as to Four Corners. The District Court has stayed these proceedings pursuant to a request by the parties, and the parties are seeking to negotiate a settlement.
In February 1998, the EPA issued regulations identifying those Clean Air Act provisions for which it is appropriate to treat Native American tribes in the same manner as states. The EPA has announced that it has not yet determined whether the Clean Air Act would supersede pre-existing binding agreements between the Navajo Nation and the Four Corners participants that could limit the Navajo Nation's environmental regulatory authority over Four Corners. The Company believes that the Clean Air Act does not supersede these pre-existing agreements. The Company cannot currently predict the outcome of this matter.
In April 2000, the Navajo Tribal Council approved operating permit regulations under the Navajo Nation Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act. The Four Corners participants believe that the regulations fail to recognize that the Navajo Nation did not intend to assert jurisdiction
32
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
over Four Corners. On July 12, 2000, each of the Four Corners participants filed a petition with the Navajo Supreme Court for review of the operating permit regulations. Those proceedings have been stayed, pending the settlement negotiations mentioned above. The Company cannot currently predict the outcome of this matter.
New Source Review Rules
In November 1999, the DOJ, at the request of the EPA, filed complaints against seven companies, alleging that the companies over the past 25 years had made modifications to their plants in violation of the NSR requirements and in some cases the NSPS regulations, which could result in the requirement to make costly environmental additions to older power plants. Whether or not the EPA will ultimately prevail is uncertain at this time.
No complaint has been filed against PNM by the EPA, and the Company believes that all of the routine maintenance, repair, and replacement work undertaken at its power plants was and continues to be in accordance with the requirements of NSR and NSPS. However, in October 2000, the NMED made an information request of PNM, advising PNM that the NMED was in the process of assisting the EPA in the EPA's nationwide effort of verifying that changes made at the country's utilities have not inadvertently triggered a modification under the Clean Air Act's PSD policies. PNM has responded to the NMED information request. In June 2002, PNM received another information request from the NMED for a list of capital projects budgeted or completed in 2001 or 2002. PNM has responded to the additional NMED information request.
In December 2002, the EPA promulgated certain long-awaited revisions to the NSR rules, along with proposals to revise the RMRR exclusion contained in the regulations. In August 2003, the EPA issued its rule regarding RMRR, clarifying what constitutes RMRR of damaged or worn equipment, subject to safeguards to assure consistency with the Clean Air Act. It provides that replacements of equipment are routine only if the new equipment is (i) identical or functionally equivalent to the equipment being replaced; (ii) does not cost more than 20% of the replacement value of the unit of which the equipment is a part; (iii) does not change the basic design parameters of the unit; and (iv) does not cause the unit to exceed any of its permitted emissions limits. Legal challenges to the RMRR rule have been filed by several states; other states have intervened in support of the rule. How such challenges will ultimately be resolved cannot be predicted but an appellate court order has stayed the effect of the RMRR rule pending the outcome of the litigation. The Company is unable to determine the impact of this matter.
The Clean Air Act
In July 1999, the EPA published its final regional haze regulations and in May 2004, the EPA proposed revisions to the regulations and proposed guidelines for best available retrofit technology. The purpose of the regional haze regulations is to address regional haze visibility impairment in the 156 Class 1 areas in the nation, which consist of national parks, wilderness areas and other similar areas. The final rule calls for all states to establish goals and emission reduction strategies for improving visibility in all the Class 1 areas. The Company cannot
33
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
predict at this time what the impact of the implementation of the regional haze rule will be on the Company's coal-fired power plant operations. Potentially, additional sulfur dioxide emission reductions and nitrogen oxide emission reductions could be required. The nature and cost of compliance with these potential requirements cannot be determined at this time. However, the Company does not anticipate any material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
Citizen Suit Under the Clean Air Act
The GCT filed a so-called "citizen suit" in federal district court in New Mexico against PNM (but not against the other SJGS co-owners) in May 2002. The suit alleged two violations of the Clean Air Act and related regulations and permits. First, GCT argued that the plant has violated, and is currently in violation of, the federal PSD rules, as well as the corresponding provisions of the New Mexico Administrative Code, at SJGS Units 3 and 4. Second, GCT alleged that the plant has "regularly violated" the 20% opacity limit contained in SJGS's operating permit and set forth in federal and state regulations at Units 1, 3 and 4. The lawsuit seeks penalties as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. PNM denied the material allegations in the complaint.
PNM obtained summary judgment dismissing GCT's PSD claims. A trial on PNM's general defenses to GCT's opacity claims was conducted in November 2003. In February 2004 the Court issued its memorandum opinion on the trial proceedings and rejected certain of PNM's general defenses, thus requiring a subsequent trial to be scheduled on PNM's defenses to individual alleged opacity violations. By letter dated April 29, 2004, GCT provided a notice of intent to sue as a jurisdictional prerequisite to filing another citizens' suit under the Clean Air Act. The notice of intent contains allegations that PNM continued to violate the applicable opacity standard for SJGS Units 1, 3 and 4 following the filing of the suit above, that PNM violated its duty to operate SJGS in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing pollution and that PNM failed to properly report emissions deviations and certify compliance with applicable air emissions standards.
By order of the court, PNM and GCT entered into settlement discussions. The discussions were expanded to include the NMED to address the "Excess Emission Reports" disclosed below. In March 2005, PNM entered into a consent decree with the NMED and GCT under which PNM and other plant owners will invest more than $200.0 million in new pollution control technology. The capital costs of the technology are estimated to be $110.0 million, with an additional $80.0 to $90.0 million estimated for operating and maintenance costs over the next 10 years. PNM's portion of costs will be approximately 47% of the total capital and operating costs. The consent decree, which is subject to the approval of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, resolves the foregoing lawsuit, the notice of intent, and certain threatened air quality claims by the NMED (see "Excess Emissions Reports" below). The consent decree is subject to review and comment by the EPA and the United States Attorney General for a period of forty-five days from their receipt of a copy of the consent decree. By letter dated April 6, 2005, the DOJ confirmed receipt of a copy of the consent decree and noted that the 45-day review period will expire on May 5, 2005. To date, no comments on
34
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
the consent decree have been received from the DOJ. PNM plans to file for an air permit with the NMED prior to starting construction on certain new equipment required by the agreement. The issue of the plaintiffs' attorney's fees and costs has been reserved for further discussion, or for determination by the court in the event PNM and the plaintiffs are unable to agree to an appropriate award.
Excess Emissions Reports
As required by law, whenever there are excess emissions from SJGS, due to such causes as start-up, shutdown, upset, breakdown or certain other conditions, PNM makes filings with the NMED. For several years, PNM has been in discussions with NMED concerning excess emissions reports for the period after January 1997. During this time, the NMED has investigated the circumstances of these excess emissions and whether these emissions involve any violation of applicable SJGS permits or regulations. In September 2003, the NMED advised that it would not excuse certain of the excess emissions that were the subject of PNM's excess emissions reporting. The NMED also adopted a new construction of PNM's operating permit relating to opacity compliance at SJGS. In May 2004, the NMED issued a "draft" compliance order that included allegations that SJGS violated certain applicable air quality limitations. This matter is also a part of the GCT settlement described above.
Archeological Site Disturbance
The Company hired Great Southwestern to conduct certain climb and tighten activities on a number of electric transmission lines in New Mexico during 2001. Those lines traverse a combination of federal, state, tribal and private properties in New Mexico. In late May 2002, the USFS notified PNM that apparent disturbances to archeological sites had been discovered in and around the rights-of-way for PNM's transmission lines in the Carson National Forest in New Mexico. Great Southwestern had performed climb and tighten activities on those transmission lines.
PNM confirmed the existence of the disturbances, as well as disturbances associated with certain arroyos that may raise issues under the Clean Water Act. PNM contracted for an archeological assessment and a proposed remediation plan with respect to the disturbances and has provided the assessment to the USFS and the federal Bureau of Land Management. The Santa Fe National Forest issued a notice of non-compliance to PNM for alleged non-compliance with the terms and conditions of PNM's special use authorization relating to maintenance of PNM's power lines on USFS land.
By letter dated March 22, 2004, the NNHPD indicated that it would not pursue either criminal or civil damages under the Archeological Resources Protection Act and proposed a stipulation to address disturbances on Navajo Nation Land. PNM and Great Southwestern entered into a letter agreement, dated June 7, 2004, with the NNHPD for a survey of potential impacts on Navajo Nation land. If disturbed cultural resources are encountered, appropriate treatment plans will be implemented. Under the terms of the June 7, 2004 letter agreement, the NNHPD agreed to release all claims against PNM and Great Southwestern for any impacts on Navajo Nation land arising from the climb and tighten project. The cultural survey of Navajo
35
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Nation land impacted by the "climb and tighten" activities was conducted in October 2004. Internal survey review is complete and PNM is anticipating external review to be concluded by the middle of May 2005 with final submission to the NNHPD by the end of May. The Company is unable to predict the outcome of this matter and cannot predict the potential impact on the Company's operations.
Santa Fe Generating Station
PNM and the NMED conducted investigations of gasoline and chlorinated solvent groundwater contamination detected beneath PNM's former Santa Fe Generating Station site to determine the source of the contamination pursuant to a 1992 Settlement Agreement between PNM and the NMED.
PNM is of the opinion that the data compiled indicates observed groundwater contamination originated from off-site sources. However, in August 2003, PNM elected to enter into a fifth amendment to the 1992 Settlement Agreement with the NMED to avoid a prolonged legal dispute whereby PNM agreed to supplement remediation facilities by installing an additional extraction well and two new monitoring wells to address remaining gasoline contamination in the groundwater at and in the vicinity of the site. PNM will continue to operate the remediation facilities until the groundwater is cleaned up to applicable federal standards or until such time as the NMED determines that additional remediation is not required, whichever is earlier. The City of Santa Fe, the NMED and PNM entered into an amended Memorandum of Understanding relating to the continued operation of the Santa Fe well and the remediation facilities called for under the latest Amended Settlement Agreement.
In September 2003, PNM was verbally informed that the Superfund Oversight Section of the NMED is conducting an investigation into the chlorinated solvent contamination in the vicinity of the former Santa Fe Generating Station site. The investigation will study possible sources for the chlorinated solvents in the groundwater. The NMED indicated that it expects to complete its investigation in the fourth quarter of 2005.
Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam Litigation
In 1999, a complaint was served on the Company alleging violations of the False Claims Act by PNM and its subsidiaries, Gathering Company and Processing Company (collectively, the "Company" for purposes of this discussion), by purportedly failing to properly measure natural gas from Federal and tribal properties in New Mexico, and consequently, underpaying royalties owed to the Federal government. A private relator is pursuing the lawsuit. The complaint was served after the DOJ declined to intervene to pursue the lawsuit. The complaint seeks actual damages, treble damages, costs and attorneys fees, among other relief.
The parties have completed discovery on the issue of whether the relator meets the requirements for bringing a claim under the False Claims Act. The Company is currently participating with other defendants in a motion to dismiss on the ground that the relator does not meet those requirements. That motion was argued before a Special Master in March 2005. The Company is vigorously defending this lawsuit and is unable to estimate the potential liability, if any, or to predict the ultimate outcome of this lawsuit.
36
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Asbestos Cases
The Company was named in 2003 as one of a number of defendants in 21 personal injury lawsuits relating to alleged exposure to asbestos. All of these cases involve claims of individuals, or their descendents, who worked for contractors building, or working at, Company power plants. Some of the claims relate to construction activities during the 1950s and 1960s, while other claims generally allege exposure during the last 30 years. The Company has never manufactured, sold or distributed products containing asbestos. PNM has been dismissed with prejudice from all but three of the cases. The Company was insured by a number of different insurance policies during the time period at issue in these cases. Although the Company is unable to fully predict the outcome of this litigation, the Company believes that these legal proceedings will not have a material impact on the financial condition of the Company.
SESCO Matter
In October 2003, the TCEQ requested information from PNM concerning any involvement that PNM had with SESCO, a former electrical equipment repair and sales company located in San Angelo, Texas. PNM was informed that the TCEQ and the EPA claim to have identified contamination of the soil and groundwater at the site.
TCEQ is conducting a site investigation of a SESCO facility pursuant to the Texas Solid Waste Act and the SESCO site has been referred to the Superfund Site Discovery and Assessment Program. The primary concern appears to be polychlorinated biphenyls in soil and groundwater on and adjacent to the site. The TCEQ is conducting the site investigation to determine what remediation activities are required at the SESCO site and to identify potentially responsible parties. In January 2004, PNM submitted its preliminary response to the TCEQ request for information. The response states that PNM previously had a requirements contract with SESCO for the repair of electric transformers. It appears that a number of transformers were sent to SESCO for repair. In addition, it appears that PNM sold a number of retired transformers to SESCO. An informational meeting took place in Austin, Texas in April 2004 where the status of the SESCO site and the possible establishment of a potentially responsible parties' committee was discussed. In February 2005, PNM agreed to participate in the potentially responsible parties' committee. PNM is voluntarily participating with the others in the investigation and may participate in any required remediation at the SESCO facility. PNM is still investigating its role in the matter, and is unable to predict the outcome at this time.
Coal Combustion Waste Disposal
SJCC currently disposes of coal combustion products consisting of fly ash, bottom ash, and gypsum from SJGS in the surface mine pits adjacent to the plant. PNM and SJCC have been participating in various sessions sponsored by EPA to consider rulemaking for the disposal of coal combustion products. The rulemaking would be pursuant to the Bevill Amendment of the
37
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. PNM cannot predict the outcome of this matter but does not believe currently that it will have a material adverse impact on the financial condition of the Company or its operations.
Western United States Wholesale Power Market
Various circumstances, including electric power supply shortages, weather conditions, gas supply costs, transmission constraints, and alleged market manipulation by certain sellers, resulted in the well-publicized "California energy crisis" and in the bankruptcy filings of the Cal PX and of PG&E. However, since the third quarter of 2001, conditions in the Western wholesale power market have changed substantially because of regulatory actions, conservation measures, the construction of additional generation, a decline in daily natural gas prices relative to levels reached during the California energy crisis and regional economic conditions.
As a result of the foregoing conditions in the Western market, the FERC and other federal and state governmental authorities initiated investigations, litigation and other proceedings relevant to the Company and other sellers. The more significant of these in relation to the Company are summarized below.
California Refund Proceeding
SDG&E and other California buyers filed a complaint with the FERC in 2000 against sellers into the California wholesale electric market. Hearings were held in September 2002, and the ALJ issued the "Proposed Findings on California Refund Liability" in December 2002, in which it was determined that the Cal ISO had, for the most part, correctly calculated the amounts of the potential refunds owed by sellers. The ALJ identified what were termed "ballpark" figures for the amount of refunds due under the order in an appendix to the proposed findings document. Pursuant to the FERC's order, PNM filed, in conjunction with the competitive supplier group, initial comments in January 2003 to the ALJ's preliminary findings addressing errors the Company believes the ALJ made in the proposed findings, and filed reply comments in February 2003.
Prior to the December 2002 ALJ decision, the Ninth Circuit ordered the FERC to allow the parties in the case to provide additional evidence regarding alleged market manipulation by sellers. Several California parties submitted additional evidence in March 2003 to support their position that virtually all market participants, including PNM, either engaged in specific market manipulation strategies or facilitated such strategies. PNM maintains that it did not engage in improper wholesale activities, and filed reply evidence in March 2003, denying the allegations against it.
In March 2003, the FERC issued an order substantially adopting the ALJ's findings in the December 2002 decision, but requiring a change to the formula used to calculate refunds. The FERC raised concerns that the indices for California gas prices, a major element in the refund formula, had been subject to potential manipulation and were unverifiable. The effect of this change would be to increase PNM's refund liability. In October 2003, the FERC issued its order
38
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
on rehearing in which it affirmed its decision to change the gas price indices used to calculate the refund amounts. This has the effect of increasing the Company's amount of refund. The precise amounts, however, will not be certain until the Cal ISO and Cal PX recalculate the refund amounts. In a report filed by the Cal ISO in March 2005, the Cal ISO indicated that the Cal PX had concluded its recalculation of the adjustments for hourly price mitigation. The Cal ISO is waiting to receive audited fuel cost information from market participants as a result of the fuel cost proceedings currently pending at the FERC before finalizing its recalculated refund amounts. In June 2004, the FERC hosted a settlement conference in which the California parties proposed a settlement template for the California refund proceedings. The Company has engaged in discussions with California parties based upon the template provided in the settlement conference, but is unable to predict whether settlement will be reached.
In September 2004, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in one of the lead appellate cases addressing the FERC's refund order. The Ninth Circuit upheld the FERC's authority to establish the market-based rate framework under the Federal Power Act, but held that the FERC violated its administrative discretion by declining to investigate whether it should order refunds from sellers who failed to provide transaction-specific reports to the FERC as required by its rules. The Ninth Circuit determined that the FERC has the authority to order refunds for these transactions if it elects to do so and remanded the case to the FERC for further proceedings, including a determination as to whether additional refunds are appropriate. PNM participated with other competitive sellers requesting rehearing by the Ninth Circuit, which is still pending. Additional appeals are still pending before the Ninth Circuit, including CPUC vs FERC , a case addressing the scope of market transactions subject to refund. PNM has participated in this appeal as one of the members of the competitive sellers group. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any FERC proceeding that may result from these appeals, or whether PNM will be ultimately directed to make any additional future refunds as the result of the decision; however, the Company has recorded a reserve for this contingency.
Pacific Northwest Refund Proceeding
In addition to the California refund proceedings, Puget Sound Energy, Inc. filed a complaint at the FERC alleging that spot market prices in the Pacific Northwest wholesale electric market were unjust and unreasonable. In September 2001, the ALJ issued a recommended decision and declined to order refunds associated with wholesale electric sales in the Pacific Northwest. In a ruling similar to the one issued in the California refund proceeding, the FERC allowed additional discovery to take place and the submission of additional evidence in the case in March 2003. In June 2003, the FERC issued an order terminating the proceeding and adopting the ALJ's recommendation that no refunds should be ordered. Several parties in the proceeding filed requests for rehearing and in November 2003, the FERC denied rehearing and reaffirmed its prior ruling that refunds were not appropriate for spot market sales in the Pacific Northwest during the first half of 2001. In November 2003, the Port of Seattle filed an appeal of the FERC's order denying rehearing in the Ninth Circuit, which is still pending. As a participant in the proceedings before the FERC, the Company is also participating in the appeal proceedings. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this appeal, or whether PNM will ultimately be directed to make any refunds.
39
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
FERC Show Cause Orders
The FERC initiated a market manipulation investigation, partially in response to the bankruptcy filing of the Enron Corporation and to allegations that Enron Corporation may have engaged in manipulation of portions of the Western wholesale power market. In connection with that investigation, all sellers into Western electric and gas markets were required to submit data regarding short-term transactions in 2000-2001. In March 2003, the FERC staff issued its final report, which addressed various types of conduct that the FERC staff believed may have violated market monitoring protocols in the Cal ISO and Cal PX tariffs. Based on the final report, the FERC issued orders to certain companies, including Enron Corporation, requiring them to show cause why the FERC should not revoke their authorizations to sell electricity at market-based rates. In addition, the FERC staff recommended that the FERC issue orders requiring certain entities to show cause why they should not be required to disgorge profits associated with conduct deemed to violate the Cal ISO and Cal PX tariffs, or be subject to other remedial action.
In June 2003, the FERC issued two separate orders to show cause against PNM and over sixty other companies. In the first order, the Gaming Practices Order, the FERC asserted that certain entities, including PNM, appeared to have participated in activities that constitute gaming and/or anomalous market behavior in violation of the Cal ISO and Cal PX tariffs during the period January 1, 2000 to June 20, 2001. Specifically, PNM is alleged to have engaged in a practice termed "False Import," which the FERC defined as the practice of exporting power generated by California and then reimporting it into California in order to avoid price caps on energy generated in California. These allegations are based primarily on an initial Cal ISO report and the additional evidentiary submission by California parties. The Cal ISO was ordered to submit additional information on which the entities subject to the Show Cause Order should respond. For PNM, the potential disgorgement for alleged "False Import" transactions covers the period May 1, 2000 to October 1, 2000. After review of the additional Cal ISO data and consultation with PNM, the FERC trial staff filed a motion to dismiss PNM from the case in August 2003. In September 2003, the California parties filed their objection to the dismissal of PNM from the case. In January 2004, the FERC issued an order granting trial staff's motion to dismiss PNM from the Gaming Practices docket on grounds that the FERC staff's investigation did not reveal that PNM engaged in the practice of "False Import." As a result, the Company has been dismissed from the Gaming Practices proceedings.
In the second order to show cause, the Gaming Partnerships Order, the FERC asserted that certain entities, including PNM, acted in concert with Enron Corporation and other market participants to engage in activities that constitute gaming and/or anomalous market behavior in violation of the Cal ISO and Cal PX tariffs during the period January 1, 2000 to June 20, 2001. Specifically, PNM is alleged to have entered into "partnerships, alliances or other arrangements" with thirteen of its customers that allegedly may have been used as market manipulation schemes. The precise basis for certain of the FERC's allegations is not clear from
40
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
the Gaming Partnerships Order, although it appears that most arise out of PNM's provision of "parking and lending" services to the identified companies. The potential remedies include disgorgement of unjust profits, as well as non-monetary remedies such as revocation of a seller's market-based rate authority.
In September 2003, PNM filed its responses to the Gaming Partnerships Order indicating that it did not engage in the alleged "partnerships, alliances or other arrangements" with the alleged parties. In October 2003, PNM filed testimony and exhibits in the case reasserting its response previously filed. In January 2004, the FERC issued an order granting the FERC staff's motion to dismiss seven of the thirteen PNM customers on grounds that there was no evidence to conclude that these companies used their commercial relationship with PNM to game the Cal ISO and Cal PX markets. In February 2004, the FERC staff and the California parties filed testimony in the case. The FERC staff did not identify any improper conduct by PNM. The California parties alleged that PNM provided false information regarding parking transactions that allowed other parties to game the California market. In March 2004, the FERC approved the settlements entered into by two of the thirteen PNM customers and dismissed another of PNM's customers from the proceeding. Of the three remaining PNM customers in the docket, the FERC staff has entered into settlement agreements with two of them. In May 2004, the Chief ALJ issued an order suspending the procedural schedule in the docket pursuant to the California parties' request to enable the parties to engage in settlement discussions of all matters related to the "California energy crisis." In September 2004, the FERC staff filed a motion to dismiss PNM from the docket and to enter into a settlement of certain parking and lending transactions. The staff's motion states that after investigation and review there is no evidence that PNM either engaged in a gaming practice that violated the Cal ISO or Cal PX tariffs by directly transacting through the Cal ISO or Cal PX markets, or shared any unjust profits earned by PNM's customers that may have engaged in gaming practices. Additionally, PNM entered into a settlement of certain matters outside the scope of the docket related to historic parking and lending transactions, under which PNM agreed not to provide parking and lending services prospectively without first meeting certain requirements agreed to with the FERC staff. Additionally, PNM agreed to pay $1.0 million in settlement to the FERC to obtain satisfaction of all issues related to any potential liability stemming from the provision of such services historically. In October 2004, the California parties filed their opposition to the motion to dismiss and settlement. Both PNM and the FERC staff have made filings in which they vigorously support the motion to dismiss PNM from the docket and the settlement reached with the FERC staff. The motion is pending at FERC. The Company is unable to predict whether the motion to dismiss PNM will be granted by the FERC, whether the settlement will be approved by the FERC, or the final outcome of this matter.
California Power Exchange and Pacific Gas and Electric Bankruptcies
In January and February 2001, SCE and the major purchasers of power from the Cal ISO and Cal PX, defaulted on payments due to the Cal ISO for power purchased from the Cal PX in 2000. These defaults caused the Cal PX to seek bankruptcy protection. PG&E subsequently also sought bankruptcy protection. PNM has filed its proofs of claims in the Cal PX and PG&E bankruptcy proceedings. Amounts due to PNM from the Cal ISO or Cal PX for power sold to
41
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
them in 2000 and 2001 total approximately $7.9 million. Both the PG&E and Cal PX bankruptcy cases have confirmed plans of reorganization in which the claims of various creditors have been specially classified and are waiting a final determination by the FERC before the claims are actually paid. The PG&E bankruptcy case has an escrow account and the Cal PX bankruptcy has established a settlement account, both of which are awaiting a determination by the FERC setting the level of claims and allocating the funds.
California Attorney General Complaint
In March 2002, the California Attorney General filed a complaint with the FERC against numerous sellers regarding prices for wholesale electric sales into the Cal ISO and Cal PX markets and to the California Department of Water Resources. PNM was among the sellers identified in this complaint and filed its answer and motion to intervene. In its answer, PNM defended its pricing and challenged the theory of liability underlying the California Attorney General's complaint. In May 2002, the FERC entered an order denying the California Attorney General's request to initiate a refund proceeding, but directed sellers, including PNM, to comply with additional reporting requirements with regard to certain wholesale power transactions. PNM has made filings required by the May 2002 order. The California Attorney General filed a petition for review in the Ninth Circuit. PNM intervened in the Ninth Circuit appeal and participated as a party in that proceeding. As noted above, in September 2004, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision upholding the FERC's authority to establish the market-based rate framework under the Federal Power Act, but held that the FERC violated its administrative discretion by declining to investigate whether it should order refunds from sellers who failed to provide transaction-specific reports to the FERC as required by its rules. The Ninth Circuit determined that the FERC has the authority to order refunds for these transactions if it elects to do so and remanded the case back to the FERC for further proceedings, including a determination as to whether additional refunds are appropriate. PNM participated with other competitive sellers requesting rehearing en banc by the Ninth Circuit, which is still pending. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the FERC proceeding on remand, or whether PNM will be ultimately directed to make any additional refunds as the result of the decision. As addressed below, the California Attorney General has also threatened litigation against PNM in state court in California based on similar allegations.
California Attorney General Threatened Litigation
The California Attorney General has filed several lawsuits in California state court against certain power marketers for alleged unfair trade practices involving overcharges for electricity. In April 2002, the California Attorney General notified PNM of intent to file a complaint in California state court against PNM concerning PNM's alleged failure to file rates for wholesale electricity sold in California and for allegedly charging unjust and unreasonable rates in the California markets. The letter invited PNM to contact the California Attorney General's office before the complaint was filed. PNM has met several times with representatives of the California Attorney General's office. Further discussions are contemplated. To date, a lawsuit has not been filed by the California Attorney General and the Company cannot predict if a lawsuit will be filed or the outcome of any such lawsuit.
42
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
California Antitrust Litigation
Several class action lawsuits have been filed in California state courts against electric generators and marketers, alleging that the defendants violated the law by manipulating the market to grossly inflate electricity prices. Named defendants in these lawsuits include Duke Energy Corporation and related entities along with other named sellers into the California market and numerous other unidentified defendants. Certain of these lawsuits were consolidated for hearing in state court in San Diego, California. In May 2002, the named defendants served a cross-claim on PNM. Duke Energy Corporation also cross-claimed against many of the other sellers into California. Duke Energy Corporation asked for declaratory relief and for indemnification for any damages that might ultimately be imposed on it. Several defendants removed the case to federal court in California. The federal judge has entered an order remanding the matter to state court, but the effect of that ruling has been stayed pending appeal. PNM has joined with other cross-defendants in motions to dismiss the cross-claim. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses but cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Block Forward Agreement Litigation
In February 2002, PNM was served with a declaratory relief complaint filed by the State of California in California state court. The state's declaratory relief complaint seeks a determination that the state is not liable for its commandeering of certain energy contracts known as "Block Forward Agreements". The Block Forward Agreements were a form of futures contracts for the purchase of electricity at below-market prices and served as security for payment by PG&E and SCE for their electricity purchases through the Cal PX. When PG&E and SCE defaulted on payment obligations incurred through the Cal PX, the Cal PX moved to liquidate the Block Forward Agreements to satisfy in part the obligations owed by PG&E and SCE. Before the Cal PX could liquidate the Block Forward Agreements, the State of California commandeered them for its own purposes. In March 2001, PNM and other similarly situated sellers of electricity through the Cal PX filed claims for damages with the California Victims Compensation and Government Claims Board (the "Victims Claims Board" for purposes of this discussion) on the theory that the state, by commandeering the Block Forward Agreements, had deprived them of security to which they were entitled under the terms of the Cal PX's tariff. The Victims Claims Board denied PNM's claim in March 2002. PNM filed a complaint against the State of California in California state court in September 2002, seeking damages for the state's commandeering of the Block Forward Agreements and requesting judicial coordination with the state's declaratory relief action filed in February 2002 on the basis that the two actions raise essentially the same issues. The California state court judge delayed establishing a procedural schedule for the case pending a determination of the Cal PX's status in the litigation. The judge has since held that the Cal PX could represent the interests of Cal PX participants in the litigation. In March 2004, both the Cal PX and the State of California filed demurrers against each other's actions, alleging each other's actions failed to state a cause of action and that the issues raised in the other's case were identical to the issues raised in their own cases. In a hearing held in April 2004, the judge determined not to rule on the demurrers until the specific
43
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
market participants named in the declaratory action proceeding affirmatively determined whether they would agree to be bound by any judgment reached in the Cal PX complaint action. As a result of the judge's order issued in May 2004, the various parties in the case were presented with a proposed stipulation under which the sellers would agree that the Cal PX would represent their interest in the proceedings, the sellers would agree to be bound by any judgment in the case, the sellers would dismiss their complaints against the State of California, and in turn, the State of California would dismiss its cross-complaints against the sellers, and the Cal PX would amend its complaint to indicate that it is bringing the lawsuit on behalf of the sellers. The Company agreed with the stipulation and executed the stipulation agreement. The Company cannot predict the outcome of the litigation involving the Cal PX and the State of California, or whether the Company will be awarded any damages as a result of the litigation.
Wholesale Power Marketing Antitrust Suit
In June 2004, PNM received notice that PNM has been included in a list of 56 defendants that have been sued by the City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities in federal district court in the State of Washington. PNM has been listed in a class of defendants referred to as the "Trading Defendants", who allegedly engaged in buying, selling and marketing power in California and other locations in the Western United States. The complaint alleges the Trading Defendants acted in concert among themselves and with "Non-Defendant Trading Co-Conspirators" that were engaged in conduct that amounted to market manipulations, which the complaint defines as a pattern of activities that had the purpose and effect of creating the impression that the demand for power was higher, the supply of power was lower, or both, than was in fact the case. The complaint identified specific conduct that allegedly amounted to market manipulations, including the submission of false information and misrepresentation regarding load schedules, bids, power supply, transmission congestion, source and destination of energy, the supply and provision of energy and ancillary services. The complaint alleged the activities of the Trading Defendants, along with "Generator Defendants", who are defined as generators who generated power for sale into California and other Western markets, and the co-conspirators, resulted in substantially increased prices for energy in the Pacific Northwest spot market in excess of what otherwise would have been the price absent such unlawful acts, in violation of antitrust laws. The complaint asserted damages in excess of $175.0 million from the multiple defendants. There have been three recent Ninth Circuit decisions that, collectively, appear to make Plaintiffs' case more difficult to prevail. As a result, PNM joined a motion to dismiss the City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities complaint given Ninth Circuit precedent. In a decision issued in February 2005, the district court judge in the case granted defendants' motion to dismiss. As a result, the antitrust lawsuit against PNM filed by the City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities was dismissed. In March 2005, the City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities filed an appeal in the Ninth Circuit contesting the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint. PNM will participate in the appeal in support of the dismissal. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this appeal, or whether the Company will be required to make any refunds or pay damages as a result of this litigation.
44
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
FERC Rule Making
Over the past several years, the FERC has issued numerous rules that have impacted the wholesale energy business. The FERC is attempting to remedy what it sees as undue discrimination in the provision of interstate transmission services and to ensure just and reasonable rates for electric energy within and among regional power markets. A proposed rule would put all transmission customers, including bundled retail customers, under FERC jurisdictional transmission tariffs. Independent transmission providers, e.g., RTOs, would provide all transmission service and congestion would be managed using locational marginal pricing mechanisms.
In addition, the FERC has issued final rules that have an impact on the wholesale energy business and participants in the wholesale energy markets, including PNM. In August 2003, the FERC issued Order 2003, which requires electric utilities that own or control electric transmission facilities to set out standard procedures and a standard agreement for interconnecting generators larger than 20 MW, and to make such revisions as necessary to its Open Access Transmission Tariff to comply with the requirements of the new rule. PNM made its initial compliance filing in January 2004 and, in September 2004, PNM received notice that its revised tariff filing was accepted by the FERC. In December 2004, the FERC issued Order 2003-B, which provided additional clarification on certain matters and required additional modifications to the pro forma tariff. PNM joined an industry group requesting rehearing of Order 2003-B, and also separately filed its petition for rehearing of Order 2003-B, both of which are still pending before the FERC. In February 2005, PNM made its compliance filing pursuant to Order 2003-B. In March 2005, PNM received notice that its compliance filing was accepted by FERC.
The FERC issued its final rule adopting standards of conduct for electric and natural gas transmission providers, known as Order 2004. The final rule expands on the FERC's prior orders establishing standards of conduct and combines the prior electric and natural gas standards so that there is now one standard for both electric and natural gas transmission providers. The revised standards of conduct generally continue the requirement of transmission providers, including PNM, to treat all transmission customers, affiliated or non-affiliated, on a non-discriminatory basis, and prohibits transmission providers from operating their system to preferentially benefit an energy or marketing affiliate. The rule became effective in February 2004, and required compliance by June 1, 2004. PNM made the required initial compliance filing stating that it is in substantial compliance with Order 2004. The FERC issued its revised Order 2004-A, which required that the training of employees be completed and compliance with provisions of the revised rule by September 1, 2004. The FERC issued Order 2004-B, which required compliance with the Standards of Conduct rule, including training of employees, by September 22, 2004. PNM implemented compliance measures, including completion of the training of employees, by the compliance deadlines. Various utilities and industry groups sought rehearing of the FERC's order, and in December 2004, the FERC issued Order 2004-C clarifying certain issues related to natural gas hedging by affiliates of transmission providers and making other clarifications. In March 2005, the FERC issued Order 2004-D clarifying certain issues related to the exemptions from energy affiliate status for Canadian local distribution companies.
45
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In 2001, in a set of cases not involving PNM, the FERC announced a new supply margin assessment screen to determine if applicants for market based rate authority could potentially exercise horizontal generation based market power. For those applicants that failed the supply margin assessment screen, the FERC would deny the market based rate application or condition its approval with certain mitigation requirements to address the market power concern. In April 2004, the FERC announced the establishment of a new interim two-pronged market power screen to be applied in market based rate cases. In May 2004, the FERC issued procedural orders in pending market based rate application/renewal cases, including PNM's case, requiring the use of the new two-pronged interim screen and requiring PNM to make its revised market based rate filing by August 2004. In July 2004, the FERC issued an order affirming its interim two-pronged market screen test. PNM filed its triennial market power screen analyses in August 2004 utilizing the new two-pronged interim screen as required by the FERC's order. In its filing, PNM noted that, although fewer in nature due to recent system improvements, it continued to face transmission constraints in Northern New Mexico and would continue to abide by the cost-based rate limitation on transmission service during times of transmission constraints for the Northern New Mexico market. PNM also noted that for the EPE control area, PNM's wholesale market share screen was slightly above 20% during two seasons. In October 2004, PNM made a supplemental filing utilizing more detailed load and generation data contained in EPE's market power screen filing, which resulted in PNM having a revised wholesale market share result below 20% for all seasons. In December 2004, the FERC issued its order in PNM's market based rate filing finding that the FERC is initiating a proceeding to determine if PNM's mitigation measure in Northern New Mexico is sufficiently adequate to prevent the exercise of market power. The FERC's order also required additional explanation of PNM's revised wholesale market share calculation. PNM filed a petition for rehearing contesting the FERC's findings regarding the EPE control area, and arguing that PNM lacks generation market power in Northern New Mexico given the transmission access available to transmission customers in that market and the pre-existing mitigation measure that FERC previously approved in 1996. The FERC also established that rates reviewed under this proceeding for transactions completed in these two markets would be subject to refund effective March 6, 2005. The Company is currently reviewing alternatives for resolution of the issues with the FERC. It is unclear whether resolution will include a requirement for refunds.
In February 2005, PNM made its compliance filing, in which the Company's expert presented various revised screen analyses for the EPE control area and concluded that the FERC should continue to permit PNM to make sales at market-based rates in that control area. The analyses showed that the screen failures disappear when the input data reflect the realities of economic and physical conditions in the Southern New Mexico market. PNM was of the view that the screen failure scenarios do not warrant the conclusion that PNM possesses generation market power in EPE's control area.
46
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
PNM's expert further concluded that the FERC should continue to permit PNM to make sales at market-based rates in PNM's Northern New Mexico control area, subject to the existing mitigation provision contained in PNM's market-based sales tariff. PNM's expert concluded that PNM does not have the potential to exercise generation market power because customers enjoy access to robust markets during the hours that concerned the FERC, and given that the pre-existing mitigation would prevent any exercise of generation market power in the event of transmission constraints. PNM's expert also concluded that, if the FERC determines that PNM should not be permitted to sell at market-based rates in its Northern New Mexico control area, the FERC nevertheless should permit PNM to sell at market-based rates at San Juan because San Juan is outside the transmission constraint path. In March 2005, EPE filed a motion in the proceeding expressing concern that PNM may have market power in the Southern New Mexico market and requesting the FERC to impose a price mitigation mechanism for PNM sales to EPE in Southern New Mexico. PNM filed its response contesting EPE's claim that PNM has market power in the Southern New Mexico market and opposing EPE's proposed mitigation measure. PNM, in April 2005, also filed a motion for appointment of a settlement judge in an effort to reach resolution on the issues pending in the proceeding.
In April 2005, the FERC issued an Order denying PNM's petition for rehearing regarding the FERC's finding that the existing mitigation measure for the Northern New Mexico control area was insufficient; rejecting PNM's February 2005 compliance filing as to both the Northern and Southern New Mexico control areas and requiring PNM to submit a compliance filing within 30 days containing one of the alternatives listed in the Order; and denying PNM's motion for assignment of a settlement judge. The FERC's Order also clarified that market based sales made at SJGS are sales made within PNM's Northern control area and are subject to these proceedings. PNM is currently preparing its compliance filing and filed a motion requesting a technical conference to obtain further clarification from the FERC regarding the Company's compliance filing. PNM anticipates the technical conference will be held early in May, 2005. PNM is also considering its options for further review of the FERC's Order. The Company cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings on the Company's financial position or results of operations; however, should the FERC determine that PNM has generation market power in these two markets, PNM could continue to make sales at cost-based rates and thus not have future revenues subject to refund in this matter.
Tax Refund Litigation
In November 2004, the United States Department of Justice filed a complaint against the Company in federal court, alleging that approximately $4.2 million of income tax refunds claimed and received for the 1998 and 1999 tax years were erroneously paid. The complaint seeks return of that refund amount, plus interest, a 10% surcharge and costs. The Company has filed an answer in response to the complaint denying all the material allegations.
The suit arises from refunds granted in connection with the 1998 and 1999 tax years. The refunds were claimed on amended returns filed in September 2002 and were paid by the IRS in November and December 2002. The government's complaint alleges that the Company did not correctly elect to deduct research and experimental expenses, and that certain costs did not qualify as research and experimental. Therefore, the government asserts that the Company is not entitled to the refunds. The Company has entered into settlement discussions with the IRS.
47
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The Company is vigorously defending this lawsuit and is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this litigation.
Other
There are various claims and lawsuits pending against the Company. The Company is also subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, and is currently participating in the investigation and remediation of numerous sites. In addition, the Company periodically enters into financial commitments in connection with its business operations. It is not possible at this time for the Company to determine fully the effect of all litigation and other legal proceedings on its consolidated financial statements. However, the Company has recorded a liability where the litigation effects can be reasonably estimated and where an outcome is considered probable. The Company does not expect that any known lawsuits, environmental costs and commitments will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations, although the outcome of litigation, investigations and other legal proceedings is inherently uncertain.
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of its business. The associated legal costs for these legal matters are accrued when incurred. It is also the Company's policy to accrue for legal costs expected to be incurred in connection with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies" ("SFAS 5") legal matters when it is probable that a SFAS 5 liability has been incurred and the amount of expected legal costs to be incurred is reasonably estimable. These estimates include costs for external counsel professional fees.
(8) Rate Matter
Transmission Rate Case
In March 2005, PNM filed a notice with the FERC to increase its wholesale electric transmission revenues by $7.8 million annually. If approved, the rate increase would apply to all of PNM's wholesale electric transmission service customers, which includes other utilities, electric co-operatives and entities that use PNM's transmission system to transmit power at the wholesale level. The proposed rate increase would not impact PNM's retail customers.
48
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(9) Other Income and Deductions
The following table details the components of other income and deductions for PNM Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
Three Months Ended |
|||
March 31, |
|||
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
||
Other income: |
|
|
|
Interest income |
$ 9,770 |
$ 9,921 |
|
Miscellaneous non-operating income |
3,240 |
1,667 |
|
$13,010 |
$11,588 |
||
Other deductions: |
|
|
|
Miscellaneous non-operating deductions |
3,107 |
3,372 |
|
$ 3,107 |
$ 3,372 |
The following table details the components of other income and deductions for PNM:
Three Months Ended |
|||
March 31, |
|||
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
||
Other income: |
|
|
|
Interest income |
$ 9,206 |
$ 9,772 |
|
Miscellaneous non-operating income |
3,276 |
1,494 |
|
$12,482 |
$11,266 |
||
Other deductions: |
|||
Miscellaneous non-operating deductions |
1,554 |
1,317 |
|
$ 1,554 |
$ 1,317 |
(10) Variable Interest Entities
FASB Interpretation No. 46, " Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities " (Revised December 2003) ("FIN 46R"), became effective January 1, 2004 for those entities considered to be special purpose entities, and March 31, 2004 for others. FIN 46R expands the requirement of a business enterprise to consolidate an entity beyond the concept of a controlling interest. Under FIN 46R, a business enterprise will consolidate an entity if that entity is a variable interest entity, the business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the entity and the entity's risks are not effectively dispersed among all parties involved. A variable interest entity has certain characteristics that effectively demonstrate that the equity investor does not have economic substance, bear the risks and receive the rewards of the entity or direct the entity's activities. The interpretation requires that an enterprise review its variable interests and determine if consolidation is appropriate.
49
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Under the model for consolidation promulgated by FIN 46R, a PPA may qualify as a variable interest if its terms expose the purchaser to variability in supply or operating costs and the contract is for a significant portion of the entity's generating capacity. The Company evaluated its PPAs under the provisions of FIN 46R and determined that one purchase contract entered into prior to December 31, 2003 qualifies as a variable interest. The Company was unable to obtain the necessary information to determine if the Company was the primary beneficiary if consolidation was necessary despite efforts including a formal written request to the operator of the entity supplying power under the PPA. The operator cited legal and competitive reasons for refusing to provide the information.
This variable interest PPA is a contract to purchase 132 MW of capacity and energy expiring in June 2020. The contract contains a fixed capacity charge, a fixed O&M charge, and a variable energy charge that subjects the Company to the changes in the cost of fuel and O&M. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the capacity and O&M charge was $1.7 million and the energy charges were $0.4 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, the capacity and O&M charge was $1.2 million and the energy charges were $0.1 million. The contract is for the full output of a specific gas generating plant and is currently accounted for as an operating lease by the Company. Under this contract the Company is exposed to changes in the costs to produce energy and operate the plant.
The Company also has interests in other variable interest entities created before January 31, 2003, for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. These arrangements include the Holding Company's investment in a limited partnership and certain PNM leases. The aggregate maximum loss exposure at March 31, 2005 that the Company could be required to record in its income statement as a result of these arrangements totals approximately $6.0 million. The creditors of these variable interest entities do not have recourse to the general credit of the Company in excess of the aggregate maximum loss exposure.
(11) Proposed TNP Acquisition
On July 24, 2004, the Holding Company executed a definitive agreement to acquire all the outstanding common shares of TNP for approximately $189.0 million, subject to a purchase price adjustment at the acquisition closing, comprised of equal amounts of the Holding Company's common stock and cash. The Company plans to retire the existing indebtedness and preferred securities at TNP. All debt at TNMP will remain outstanding.
In September 2004, the Board adopted a resolution approving the terms of the Holding Company's agreement with Cascade, an existing shareholder, which calls for the Holding Company, upon the request of Cascade and subject to the receipt of any necessary approvals from the SEC, to propose to its shareholders at the 2005 annual meeting an amendment to the Holding Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation. The amendment would enable the Holding Company to confer upon holders of preferred stock issued under the Cascade agreement, voting as a single class with holders of common stock, the same number of votes to
50
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
which the number of shares of common stock into which the preferred stock is convertible on all matters other than the election of directors of the Holding Company. There is a limit on the aggregate amount of preferred stock outstanding with such voting rights. The limit is such that outstanding preferred stock with such voting rights may be convertible to no more than 12 million shares of common stock.
On February 3, 2005, the Holding Company announced that it had reached a settlement agreement in Texas for its acquisition of TNP. The settlement agreement is between the Holding Company and TNMP, the cities of Dickinson, Lewisville, La Marque, Ft. Stockton and Friendswood, Texas, the Legal and Enforcement Division of the PUCT, the Office of Public Utility Counsel, the Texas Industrial Energy Consumers and the Alliance for Retail Markets. The settlement agreement outlines terms and conditions necessary for the PUCT to find the acquisition of TNP and its subsidiaries, TNMP and First Choice Power, to be in the public interest. On March 31, 2005, the PUCT approved an order finding the acquisition of TNP by the Holding Company to be in the public interest. The order was issued in April 2005.
On February 2, 2005, the Holding Company was notified that the proposed acquisition of TNP had received anti-trust clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 from the Federal Trade Commission.
On February 28, 2005, the Holding Company announced that it reached a settlement agreement in New Mexico for its acquisition of TNP. The Holding Company, TNMP, the NMPRC staff, the New Mexico State Attorney General's Office and the New Mexico Industrial Energy Consumers, signed the unopposed stipulation. The stipulation must be approved by the NMPRC. A hearing regarding the Holding Company's stipulation and the proposed acquisition of TNP was held April 11, 2005 before a NMPRC hearing examiner. A decision from the NMPRC is pending.
On March 2, 2005, the FERC voted to approve the planned acquisition by the Holding Company of the securities of TNP. Based on its review, the FERC determined that the proposed transaction is consistent with the public interest.
The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and remaining regulatory approvals, including the NMPRC and the SEC under the PUHCA. No shareholder approval is required for the acquisition. The Holding Company believes at this time that all conditions precedent to closing, including final resolution of regulatory proceedings, can be met so that closing can occur in the second quarter of 2005.
The transaction may be terminated under certain circumstances described in the agreement, including the failure to close by December 31, 2005.
51
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(12) New Accounting Standards
FASB Interpretation No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations" ("FIN 47"). Due to diverse accounting practices, in March 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47 which states that an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation (ARO) when incurred if the liability's fair value can be reasonably estimated. The Interpretation clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of the ARO. An ARO would be reasonably estimable if: (a) it is evident that the fair value of the obligation is embodied in the acquisition price of the asset, (b) an active market exists for the transfer of the obligation, or (c) sufficient information exists to apply an expected present value technique. Upon application of FIN 47, amounts will be measured using current information, assumptions and interest rates. The recognized asset retirement cost will be measured as of the date the ARO was incurred. Cumulative accretion and accumulated depreciation will be recorded for the time period from the date the liability would have been recognized had the provisions of this Interpretation been in effect when the liability was incurred to the date of adoption of this Interpretation. The cumulative effect of initially applying FIN 47 should be recognized as a change in accounting principle. FIN 47 will be effective for the year ending December 31, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 47 and is unable to predict its impact on the Company's operating results and financial position at this time.
52
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the Holding Company and Subsidiaries and PNM and Subsidiaries is presented on a combined basis. Currently, the business of PNM constitutes substantially all of the business of the Holding Company. Therefore, the historical results of operations of PNM are virtually identical to the consolidated results of the Holding Company and all its subsidiaries. For discussion purposes, this report will use the term "Company" when discussing matters of common applicability to the Holding Company and Subsidiaries and PNM. Readers of this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should assume that the information presented applies to consolidated results of operations of both the Holding Company and its subsidiaries, including PNM, except where the context or references clearly indicate otherwise. Discussions regarding specific contractual obligations generally reference the company that is legally obligated. In the case of contractual obligations of PNM, these obligations are consolidated with the Holding Company and its subsidiaries under GAAP. Broader operational discussions refer to the Company.
The Holding Company was established as the holding company in 2001. On December 30, 2004, the Holding Company became a registered holding company under PUHCA. The Holding Company also created a new subsidiary called PNMR Services Company, which began operating on January 1, 2005, subject to final approval by the SEC.
The Holding Company performed substantially all of the corporate activities of PNM from 2001 to 2004. These activities were billed to PNM on a cost basis to the extent they were for the corporate management of PNM and were allocated to the operating segments. The services functions previously performed by the Holding Company were assumed by PNMR Services Company effective January 1, 2005.
The Holding Company is an investor-owned holding company of energy and energy related companies. Its principal subsidiary, PNM, is an integrated public utility primarily engaged, within the State of New Mexico, in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity; transmission, distribution and sale of natural gas; and the sale and marketing of electricity in the Western United States. The Company views a merchant utility as the balanced combination of a strong regulated utility with growth-oriented electric sales in competitive markets.
The Company is positioned as a merchant utility, primarily operating as a regulated energy service provider. The Company is also engaged in the sale and marketing of electricity in the competitive wholesale energy marketplace. As a utility, PNM has an obligation to serve its customers under the jurisdiction of the NMPRC. As a wholesale electricity provider, PNM markets excess production from the utility, as well as unregulated generation, into a competitive marketplace. As part of its electric wholesale power operation, it purchases wholesale electricity in the open market for future resale or to provide energy to retail customers in New Mexico when the Company's generation assets cannot satisfy demand. The wholesale operations primarily utilize a net asset-backed strategy, whereby the Company's aggregate net open position for the sale of electricity is covered by the Company's forecasted excess generation capabilities.
53
As it currently operates, the Company's principal business segments, whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Company's management, are Utility Operations and Wholesale Operations. Utility Operations include Electric, Gas and Transmission. These segments model the resource allocations as mandated in the Global Electric Agreement (see Note 7 - "Commitments and Contingencies - Global Electric Agreement", in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Electric consists of the distribution and generation of electricity for retail electric customers in New Mexico. Gas includes the transportation and distribution of natural gas to end-users. Transmission consists of the transmission of electricity to third parties as well as to Electric and Wholesale. Wholesale consists of the generation and sale of electricity into the wholesale market based on three product lines that include long-term contracts, forward sales and short-term sales.
The Utility Operations strategy is directed at supplying reasonably priced and reliable energy to retail customers through customer-driven operational excellence, high quality customer service, cost efficient processes, and improved overall organizational performance.
The Wholesale Operations strategy calls primarily for increased net asset-backed energy sales supported by long-term contracts into the wholesale market, whereby the Company's aggregate net open forward electric sales position, including short term sales, forward sales and long-term contracts, is covered by its forecasted excess generation capacity. Management actively monitors the net asset-backed sales by the use of stringent risk management policies. The Company's future growth plans call for approximately 75% of its new generation portfolio to be committed through long-term contracts as required by the Global Electric Agreement. Growth will be dependent on market development and on the Company's ability to generate funds for the Company's future expansion. The Company will continue to operate in the wholesale market and seek reasonably priced asset additions. Expansion of the Company's generating portfolio will depend on the Company's ability to acquire favorably priced assets at strategic locations and to secure long-term commitments for the purchase of power from the acquired plants.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements and related notes. Trends and contingencies of a material nature are discussed to the extent known. Refer to "Disclosure Regarding Forward Looking Statements" and "Risk Factors" at the end of this Item 2.
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY
The Company's vision is to "Build America's Best Merchant Utility." To achieve this objective, management intends to:
Grow Regulated and Unregulated Operations . The Company intends to grow both its retail and wholesale business by expanding its current operations and by acquiring additional value-enhancing assets. As evidenced by the Luna acquisition and the proposed TNP acquisition, the Company intends to continue to grow its revenues by expanding its geographic coverage in the Southwest, a region which not only exhibits rapid customer and load growth, but which the Company knows well. The Company plans to focus on best practices in integrating its acquisitions to create a stronger presence in the Southwest market. The Company also intends
54
to increase its presence in the Southwest market by buying additional generating resources and selling power from those resources through long-term contracts. In addition, the Company expects that the acquisition of First Choice Power as part of the proposed TNP acquisition, as discussed below, will provide a solid foundation for entry into the competitive retail market in Texas.
Acquire Additional Generating Assets in the Southwest Region . The Company intends to enhance and diversify its presence in the Southwest region through the acquisition of quality generation assets to serve the Company's retail and wholesale load while maintaining diversity of fuel mix. The Company plans to increase long-term sales contracts in tandem with increases in its generation capacity. The Company expects to do this through the addition of gas-fired generation plants and the acquisition of coal-fired facilities, the acquisition or development of renewable or clean technology resources and/or the use of long-term purchase contracts for power. As in the past, the Company intends to continue a disciplined approach to any acquisition, to match acquisitions to demand and to hedge capacity with long-term contracts.
Maintain Prudent Cost Controls . Management continues to maintain cost control procedures and expects to implement similar control procedures at TNP once the acquisition is complete. As a result of PNM's coal contract, the Company's fuels group has also been able to mitigate the Company's exposure to coal prices at the SJCC through December 2017, which the Company believes will help it improve or maintain gross margins if coal costs rise.
Continue to Improve Credit Strength and Reduce Cost of Capital . A high priority and long term commitment is to maintain the Company's investment grade rating in any type of regulatory or commodity price scenario. The Company believes TNP offers an opportunity to derive additional value through the stronger credit profile of the combined entity. Since December 31, 2002, the Company has reduced its weighted average cost of long-term debt from 6.56% at December 31, 2002 to 4.77% at December 31, 2004. In addition, as discussed below, the Company expects to reduce TNP's current financing costs by at least $40.0 million annually, on a pre-tax basis, through the refinancing of TNP's relatively high-cost capital.
Commitment to Corporate Citizenship . The Company is committed to its guiding principle, "Do the Right Thing." This commitment serves as the cornerstone of the Company's ethics and compliance efforts and underscores its effort to ensure that dealings with customers, employees, shareholders and business partners are above reproach. This is evidenced by the Company's environmental sustainability program with aggressive five-year goals for reducing water usage, improving air quality, reducing waste streams and becoming a leader in the development of renewable energy.
ACQUISITIONS
Proposed Acquisition of TNP. In July 2004, the Company announced the proposed $1.024 billion acquisition of TNP, including its principal subsidiaries, TNMP and First Choice Power. The Company expects the proposed TNP acquisition to be accretive to its earnings and free cash flow in the first full year after closing, subject to certain assumptions as described below.
TNP is the privately owned holding company of TNMP and First Choice Power. TNMP provides transmission and distribution services to retail electric providers in Texas' competitive electricity market, composed of approximately 207,000 retail customers in Texas and approximately 49,000 in New Mexico. First Choice Power is one of the state's retail electric providers with approximately 58,000 retail customers in Texas.
55
The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals, including approvals by the NMPRC, the PUCT, the SEC under the PUHCA and the FERC. No shareholder approval is required for the acquisition. The Company believes at this time that all conditions precedent to closing, including final resolution of regulatory proceedings, can be satisfied so that closing can occur in the second quarter of 2005. The Company will lead the integration efforts and implementation of the transition plan that will be executed upon receiving regulatory approvals.
The Company believes that the proposed TNP acquisition is consistent with its strategic plan of balancing stable and predictable revenue streams with prudent and measured growth opportunities. Upon the consummation of the proposed TNP acquisition, the Company will serve approximately 1.2 million customers, with 727,000 electric customers and 471,000 gas customers. Of the electric customers, approximately 159,000 will be "price-to-beat" customers in Texas and 58,000 will be retail customers in Texas. The Company believes TNMP's utility operations will provide an additional stable source of revenue and cash flow.
The proposed TNP acquisition will strengthen the Company's position as a leading energy provider in the growing Southwest region, providing market, customer and regulatory diversity. In addition, the Company expects First Choice Power's established retail customer base and operations, when combined with the Company's generation source hedging, financial strength and power-marketing expertise, to present additional potential to improve margins and increase market penetration in Texas.
The combined company is expected to have consolidated annual revenues of over $2.3 billion and would serve a number of growing communities, including Albuquerque, Santa Fe, and Alamogordo in New Mexico, as well as suburban areas around Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, and Galveston in Texas. Through First Choice Power, the Holding Company will also serve customers in communities throughout the ERCOT region.
Under the terms of the TNP stock purchase agreement TNP's common shareholders will receive approximately $189.0 million in consideration, subject to a purchase price adjustment at the acquisition closing, consisting of equal amounts of newly issued Holding Company common shares and cash. The existing indebtedness and preferred securities at TNP are expected to be retired on or shortly following the closing. All debt at TNMP will remain outstanding.
Based on the number of common shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis and taking into account additional equity issuances, following the transaction, the Holding Company's shareholders would own 94% of the combined company's common equity, and TNP's shareholders would own 6%.
As discussed previously, the Holding Company issued common equity and equity linked securities in March 2005, completing all of the financing for the TNP acquisition. As a result of discussions with the rating agencies pursuant to their ratings evaluation services, the Company believes that the acquisition financing will not result in any credit rating changes for the Holding Company or PNM. Around the closing date of the acquisition, the Holding
56
Company plans to issue an additional $100.0 million of equity linked securities in a private-placement to Cascade and borrow $100.0 million on its revolving credit facility. The Holding Company has entered into a $100.0 million notional floating-to-fixed interest rate swap that effectively locks the interest rate for the related revolving credit facility debt at 4.97% through November 2009. See "Equity Unit Offering" and "Common Stock Offering" in the "Liquidity and Capital Resources" section below for additional details about financing arrangements related to the proposed TNP acquisition.
In September 2004, the Board adopted a resolution approving the terms of the Holding Company's agreement with Cascade, which calls for the Holding Company, upon the request of Cascade and subject to the receipt of any necessary approvals from the SEC, to propose to its shareholders at the 2005 annual meeting an amendment to the Holding Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation. The amendment would enable the Holding Company to confer upon holders of preferred stock issued under the Agreement, voting as a single class with holders of common stock, the same number of votes to which the number of shares of common stock into which the preferred stock is convertible on all matters other than the election of directors of the Holding Company. Under the amended terms, the aggregate amount of preferred stock outstanding with such voting rights would be convertible into no more than 12 million shares of common stock. Shareholder approval is not a condition of the acquisition transaction.
On February 3, 2005, the Holding Company announced that it had reached a settlement agreement in Texas for its acquisition of TNP. The settlement agreement is between the Holding Company and TNMP, the cities of Dickinson, Lewisville, La Marque, Ft. Stockton and Friendswood, Texas, the Legal and Enforcement Division of the PUCT, the Office of Public Utility Counsel, the Texas Industrial Energy Consumers and the Alliance for Retail Markets. The settlement agreement outlines terms and conditions necessary for the PUCT to find the acquisition of TNP and its subsidiaries, TNMP and First Choice Power, to be in the public interest. Among other issues, the settlement agreement calls for:
A two-year electric rate freeze that includes a $13.0 million annual rate reduction in TNMP's retail delivery rates effective May 1, 2005,
An authorized return on equity of 10.25% on an implied capital structure of 60% debt and 40% equity for certain reporting purposes,
The use of a 60/40% debt/equity capital structure in TNMP's next base rate case if filed before January 1, 2009, and
A $6.0 million synergy savings credit amortized over 24 months effective after the closing of the transaction.
On March 31, 2005, the PUCT approved an order finding the acquisition of TNP by the Holding Company to be in the public interest.
On February 28, 2005, the Holding Company announced that it reached a settlement agreement in New Mexico for its acquisition of TNP. The Holding Company, TNMP, the NMPRC staff, the New Mexico State Attorney General's Office and the New Mexico Industrial Energy Consumers, signed the unopposed stipulation. The stipulation must be approved by the NMPRC. Among other issues, the stipulation:
57
Provides TNMP's 49,000 electric customers in southern New Mexico with a three-phase rate reduction totaling 15%, beginning January 2006 and ending December 2010. The rate reduction, which includes TNMP's annual synergy-savings allocation of $380,000, will lower TNMP electric rates by $9.6 million in the first year.
Allows TNMP an imputed 55/45% debt/equity structure with an assumed rate of return on equity of 10.5%.
Maintains PNM as the power supplier for TNMP's New Mexico needs through 2010.
Calls for the integration of TNMP's New Mexico assets into PNM effective January 1, 2007. The companies, however, will maintain separate rates through 2010.
The stipulation also provides resolution on how consolidation savings, or synergy savings, will be allocated among PNM gas and electric customers. According to the stipulation:
PNM's 413,000 electric customers will receive rate credits totaling $4.6 million or nearly $1.84 million annually over a 30-month period beginning January 2008.
PNM's 471,000 gas customers will receive $4.3 million in rate credits over five years, or $860,000 annually, beginning at the close of the acquisition.
A hearing regarding the Holding Company's stipulation and the proposed acquisition of TNP was held April 11, 2005 before a NMPRC hearing examiner. A decision from the NMPRC is pending.
On March 2, 2005, the FERC voted to approve the planned acquisition by the Holding Company of the securities of TNP. The FERC reviewed the proposed transaction under the FERC's Merger Policy Statement, to determine whether it is consistent with the public interest by applying a three-part test. Specifically, the FERC examined the effect of the proposed transaction on: (1) competition, (2) rates, and (3) regulation. Based on its review, the FERC determined that the proposed transaction is consistent with the public interest.
On February 2, 2005, the Holding Company was notified that the proposed acquisition of TNP had received anti-trust clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 from the Federal Trade Commission.
The transaction may be terminated under certain circumstances described in the TNP stock purchase agreement, including the failure to close by December 31, 2005.
OVERALL OUTLOOK
Earnings growth in the first quarter of 2005 was primarily due to strong growth in the Company's electric and gas utility, and the positive effect of the gas rate increase, which went into full effect in April 2004. Other factors that contributed to the increase in earnings during the first quarter of 2005 included lower purchased power contract prices, improved plant performance, and continued cost-control measures throughout the Company.
58
Wholesale margin increased $4.4 million, or 18.0%, in the first quarter of 2005 over the prior year quarter. Increased market prices, plant availability and reductions in purchase power contract prices provided less expensive excess energy for sale in the wholesale market.
Electric margin decreased $1.2 million, or 1.3%, in 2005 from the prior year quarter. An unusually warm January in 2005 coupled with increased generation costs offset a steady increase in jurisdiction load growth.
Gas margin increased $4.1 million, or 8.8%, over the prior year quarter primarily due to the residential cost-of-service rate increase. This increase was partially offset by the relatively warmer weather in 2005.
The Company has previously utilized and reported, including on previously filed Forms 8-K, the historical heating degree-day values (HDD) and cooling degree-day values (CDD), which represent the accumulation in degrees that the daily mean temperature was below or above, respectively, 65 degrees Fahrenheit during a period of time, typically corresponding to a calendar month. In order to provide a greater correlation between energy consumption and weather, the Company has recently decided to utilize and report HDD and CDD that have been weighted based on the Company's billing cycle days. The HDD reported in the "Results of Operations" that follows have been so weighted. The Company believes that this approach provides a better means of assessing the impact of weather on revenues.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
Compared to Three Months Ended March 31,
2004
Consolidated
The Company's net earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were $30.5 million or $0.50 per diluted share of common stock, a 23.1% increase in net earnings compared to $24.8 million or $0.41 per diluted share of common stock in the three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase in earnings was driven primarily by strong wholesale electric market performance, load growth, and an increase in cost of service gas rates.
The following discussion is based on the methodology that the Company's management uses for making operating decisions and assessing performance of its various business activities. As such, these segments report operating results with regard to the effect of accounting or regulatory changes, and similar one-time items not related to normal operations within the Corporate and Other segment. See Note 2 - "Segment Information" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding these results and the consolidated financial statements.
In addition, adjustments related to EITF Issue 03-11, " Reporting Realized Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments That Are Subject to FASB Statement No. 133 and Not Held for Trading Purposes ", are excluded. This accounting pronouncement requires a net presentation of realized gains and losses for certain non-trading derivatives. Management evaluates wholesale operations on a gross presentation basis due to its primarily net-asset-backed marketing strategy and the importance it places on the Company's ability to repurchase and remarket previously sold capacity.
59
Income taxes and non-operating items are discussed only on a consolidated basis and are in conformity with the presentation in the consolidated financial statements.
Utility Operations
Electric Retail
The table below sets forth the operating results for Electric.
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
||||||||||
March 31, |
|
|
|
||||||||||
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Variance |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||
|
Operating revenues: |
$ 129,718 |
$ 130,036 |
$ (318) |
|||||||||
|
Less: Cost of energy |
53,251 |
51,637 |
1,614 |
|||||||||
|
Intersegment energy transfer |
(14,123) |
(13,413) |
(710) |
|||||||||
|
Gross margin |
90,590 |
|
|
91,812 |
|
(1,222) |
||||||
|
Energy production costs |
28,193 |
29,521 |
(1,328) |
|||||||||
|
Transmission and distribution O&M |
4,598 |
5,202 |
(604) |
|||||||||
|
Customer related expense |
4,015 |
4,103 |
(88) |
|||||||||
|
Administrative and general |
1,789 |
65 |
1,724 |
|||||||||
|
Total non-fuel O&M |
38,595 |
|
|
38,891 |
|
(296) |
||||||
|
Corporate allocation |
14,183 |
15,901 |
(1,718) |
|||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
14,770 |
13,970 |
800 |
|||||||||
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
4,743 |
4,826 |
(83) |
|||||||||
|
Income taxes |
4,425 |
4,353 |
72 |
|||||||||
|
Total non-fuel operating expenses |
76,716 |
|
|
77,941 |
|
(1,225) |
||||||
|
Operating income |
$ 13,874 |
$ 13,871 |
|
$ 3 |
||||||||
The following table shows electric revenues by customer class and average customers:
Electric Retail Revenues
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
March 31, |
|
||||
2005 |
|
2004 |
Variance |
||
(In thousands except customers) |
|||||
Residential |
$ 54,014 |
$ 54,132 |
$ (118) |
||
Commercial |
56,166 |
56,751 |
(585) |
||
Industrial |
15,203 |
14,887 |
316 |
||
Other |
4,335 |
4,266 |
69 |
||
$ 129,718 |
$ 130,036 |
$ (318) |
|||
|
|||||
Average customers |
413,825 |
403,245 |
10,580 |
60
The following table shows electric sales by customer class:
Electric Retail Sales
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
March 31, |
|
||||
2005 |
|
2004 |
Variance |
||
(Megawatt hours) |
|||||
Residential |
654,093 |
655,484 |
(1,391) |
||
Commercial |
767,376 |
776,842 |
(9,466) |
||
Industrial |
315,816 |
310,675 |
5,141 |
||
Other |
51,869 |
50,689 |
1,180 |
||
1,789,154 |
1,793,690 |
(4,536) |
Operating revenues decreased $0.3 million, or 0.2%, from the prior year quarter. Retail electricity sales decreased 0.3%, to 1.789 million MWh in the first quarter of 2005 compared to 1.794 million MWh in the first quarter of 2004. Warmer winter weather in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004 caused a $1.2 million decrease in revenues. Heating Degree Days, (weighted based on the Company's billing cycle, see "Overall Outlook" above), for Albuquerque declined approximately 8.4% to 2,084 during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to 2,274 during the quarter ended March 31, 2004. In addition, a decrease of $1.3 million was attributable to the 2004 leap year, with 2005 including one less day of revenues. Customer growth was 2.6% and weather-normalized retail electric load growth was 1.9% in the first quarter of 2005. Average customer growth, when normalized for the impact of weather and the leap year, increased revenues by $2.2 million.
The gross margin, or operating revenues minus cost of energy sold and intersegment energy transfer, decreased $1.2 million, or 1.3%, over the prior year quarter due to higher generation costs, driven primarily by increased fuel costs.
Total non-fuel O&M expenses decreased $0.3 million, or 0.8%, over the prior year quarter. Energy production costs decreased $1.3 million, or 4.5%, due to lower plant maintenance costs in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. A planned outage at Four Corners in the first quarter of 2004 that did not occur in 2005 caused energy production costs to decrease $1.7 million. This was partially offset by a planned outage at Reeves in the first quarter of 2005 that increased costs $1.0 million and by $0.4 million of costs incurred in anticipation of a 2005 outage at SJGS Unit 4. On March 26, 2005, a circulating water pipe ruptured and forced SJGS Unit Four to be taken offline. This unexpected three-week outage was combined with a planned minor overhaul of the same unit as the Company then accelerated the planned outage to minimize the economic impact of the shutdown. SJGS Unit Four was back online on April 17, 2005. The Company expects the SJGS Unit Four shutdown to reduce its second quarter electric retail pre-tax earnings by approximately $3.2 million and consolidated pre-tax earnings by $5.0 million, with the remainder of the impact in the wholesale segment. However, the Company expects to have lower operating costs and recover the lost revenue in the fourth quarter of 2005 when the Unit Four planned outage would otherwise have occurred.
61
Transmission and distribution O&M expense decreased $0.6 million, or 11.6%, primarily due to lower meter-related expenses and labor costs in the first quarter of 2005. Administrative and general expense increased $1.7 million from the prior year quarter primarily due to increased labor costs of $1.0 million, which were partially offset by the decrease in labor costs in transmission and distribution O&M, and by increased benefit costs.
Depreciation and amortization increased $0.8 million, or 5.7%, over the prior year quarter due to asset and software additions placed in service in December 2004. The Company expects to see depreciation continue to increase in the future as a result of increased investment in new information technology platforms and other capital investment.
Gas
The table below sets forth the operating results for Gas.
Three Months Ended |
|
|
||||
March 31, |
|
|
||||
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Variance |
||
(In thousands) |
||||||
Operating revenues : |
$ 165,286 |
|
|
$ 175,874 |
|
$ (10,588) |
Less: Cost of energy |
114,435 |
129,148 |
(14,713) |
|||
Gross margin |
50,851 |
|
|
46,726 |
|
4,125 |
Energy production costs |
628 |
533 |
95 |
|||
Transmission and distribution O&M |
6,695 |
7,585 |
(890) |
|||
Customer related expense |
4,275 |
4,136 |
139 |
|||
Administrative and general |
1,179 |
569 |
610 |
|||
Total non-fuel O&M |
12,777 |
|
|
12,823 |
|
(46) |
Corporate allocation |
9,369 |
9,598 |
(229) |
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,576 |
4,729 |
847 |
|||
Taxes other than income taxes |
1,948 |
2,158 |
(210) |
|||
Income taxes |
7,228 |
5,812 |
1,416 |
|||
Total non-fuel operating expenses |
36,898 |
|
|
35,120 |
|
1,778 |
Operating income |
$ 13,953 |
|
|
$ 11,606 |
|
$ 2,347 |
The following table shows gas revenues by customer and average customers:
Gas Revenues
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
March 31, |
|
||||
2005 |
|
2004 |
Variance |
||
(In thousands except customers) |
|||||
Residential |
$ 108,269 |
$ 115,738 |
$ (7,469) |
||
Commercial |
31,931 |
36,156 |
(4,225) |
||
Industrial |
643 |
668 |
(25) |
||
Transportation* |
3,988 |
4,304 |
(316) |
||
Other |
20,455 |
19,008 |
1,447 |
||
$ 165,286 |
$ 175,874 |
$ (10,588) |
|||
|
|||||
Average customers |
470,336 |
461,128 |
9,208 |
* Customer owned gas.
62
The following table shows gas throughput by customer class:
Gas Throughput
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
March 31, |
|
||||
2005 |
|
2004 |
Variance |
||
(Thousands of decatherms) |
|||||
Residential |
12,758 |
14,014 |
(1,256) |
||
Commercial |
4,309 |
4,818 |
(509) |
||
Industrial |
85 |
104 |
(19) |
||
Transportation* |
8,150 |
7,720 |
430 |
||
Other |
2,791 |
3,058 |
(267) |
||
28,093 |
29,714 |
(1,621) |
*Customer-owned gas
Operating revenues decreased $10.6 million, or 6.0%, over the prior year quarter. Residential and commercial revenues decreased $7.5 million and $4.2 million, respectively and total gas sales volumes decreased 5.5%. Management of gas cost billing rates through the PGAC decreased revenues $10.2 million. Warmer winter weather in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004 caused a $9.5 million decrease in revenues. As noted above in "Electric Retail", Heating Degree Days for Albuquerque declined approximately 8.4% in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period of 2004. These decreases were offset somewhat by average customer growth of 2.0%, which increased gas revenues $0.7 million and by an increase of $6.7 million due to a cost of service rate increase granted by the NMPRC in January 2004.
The gross margin, or operating revenues minus cost of energy sold, increased $4.1 million, or 8.8%, over the prior year quarter. This increase was due mainly to customer growth and the NMPRC-approved rate increase, partially offset by the impact of warmer weather in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period of 2004 described above.
Total non-fuel O&M expenses were largely unchanged over the prior year quarter. Transmission and distribution O&M expense decreased $0.9 million, or 11.7%, primarily due to reduced labor costs. This decrease was mostly offset by a $0.6 million increase in administrative and general expense, which was also primarily attributable to labor costs.
Depreciation and amortization increased $0.8 million, or 17.9%, over the prior year quarter primarily due to asset and software additions placed in service in December 2004. The Company expects to see depreciation continue to increase in the future as a result of increased investment in new information technology platforms.
63
Transmission
The table below sets forth the operating results for Transmission.
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
||||||||||
March 31, |
|
|
|
||||||||||
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Variance |
|
||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||
|
Operating revenues : |
||||||||||||
|
External customers |
$ 4,464 |
$ 4,414 |
$ 50 |
|||||||||
|
Intersegment revenues |
7,877 |
7,896 |
(19) |
|||||||||
|
Total revenues |
12,341 |
|
|
12,310 |
|
31 |
||||||
|
Less: Cost of energy |
2,029 |
1,356 |
673 |
|||||||||
|
Gross margin |
10,312 |
|
|
10,954 |
|
(642) |
||||||
|
Energy production costs |
288 |
302 |
(14) |
|||||||||
|
Transmission and distribution O&M |
2,787 |
2,691 |
96 |
|||||||||
|
Customer related expense |
6 |
7 |
(1) |
|||||||||
|
Administrative and general |
541 |
113 |
428 |
|||||||||
|
Total non-fuel O&M |
3,622 |
|
|
3,113 |
|
509 |
||||||
|
Corporate allocation |
1,275 |
1,400 |
(125) |
|||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
2,788 |
2,708 |
80 |
|||||||||
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
685 |
656 |
29 |
|||||||||
|
Income taxes |
167 |
634 |
(467) |
|||||||||
|
Total non-fuel operating expenses |
8,537 |
|
|
8,511 |
|
26 |
||||||
|
Operating income |
$ 1,775 |
|
|
$ 2,443 |
|
$ (668) |
||||||
Transmission gross margin, or operating revenues minus cost of energy sold, decreased $0.6 million, or 5.9%, compared to the prior year quarter primarily due to additional costs for the EPE wheeling contract acquired for the transmission of Afton which occurred in April 2004. Cost of energy represents purchased transmission to support transmission offerings.
Total non-fuel O&M expenses increased $0.5 million, or 16.4%, from the prior year quarter primarily due to increased administrative and general costs, which increased $0.4 million mainly due to increased labor costs.
In March 2005, PNM filed a notice with the FERC to increase its wholesale electric transmission revenues by $7.8 million annually. If approved, the rate increase would apply to all of PNM's wholesale electric transmission service customers, which includes other utilities, electric co-operatives and entities that use PNM's transmission system to transmit power at the wholesale level. The proposed rate increase would not impact PNM's retail customers.
64
Wholesale
The table below sets forth the operating results for Wholesale.
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||||||||
March 31, |
|
|||||||||||
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Variance |
|
|||||||
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Operating revenues : |
$ 132,004 |
|
|
$ 127,491 |
|
$ 4,513 |
|||||
|
Less: Cost of energy |
89,312 |
89,866 |
(554) |
||||||||
|
Intersegment energy transfer |
14,123 |
13,413 |
710 |
||||||||
|
Gross margin |
28,569 |
|
|
24,212 |
|
4,357 |
|||||
|
Energy production costs |
6,955 |
7,198 |
(243) |
||||||||
|
Transmission and distribution O&M |
8 |
13 |
(5) |
||||||||
|
Customer related expense |
278 |
419 |
(141) |
||||||||
|
Administrative and general |
1,694 |
1,563 |
131 |
||||||||
|
Total non-fuel O&M |
8,935 |
|
|
9,193 |
|
(258) |
|||||
|
Corporate allocation |
1,037 |
1,132 |
(95) |
||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
3,987 |
3,754 |
233 |
||||||||
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
916 |
923 |
(7) |
||||||||
|
Income taxes |
3,831 |
2,302 |
1,529 |
||||||||
|
Total non-fuel operating expenses |
18,706 |
|
|
17,304 |
|
1,402 |
|||||
|
Operating income |
$ 9,863 |
|
|
$ 6,908 |
|
$ 2,955 |
|||||
The following table shows revenues by customer class:
Wholesale Revenues
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
March 31, |
|
||||
2005 |
|
2004 |
Variance |
||
(In thousands) |
|||||
Long-term contracts* |
$ 37,475 |
$ 36,582 |
$ 893 |
||
Forward sales* |
30,579 |
22,643 |
7,936 |
||
Short-term sales |
63,950 |
68,266 |
(4,316) |
||
$ 132,004 |
$ 127,491 |
$ 4,513 |
*Includes mark-to-market gains/(losses).
65
The following table shows sales by customer class:
Wholesale Sales
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
March 31, |
|
||||
2005 |
|
2004 |
Variance |
||
(Megawatt hours) |
|||||
Long-term contracts |
725,403 |
714,421 |
10,982 |
||
Forward sales |
765,760 |
623,160 |
142,600 |
||
Short-term sales |
1,359,263 |
1,643,685 |
(284,422) |
||
2,850,426 |
2,981,266 |
(130,840) |
Operating revenues increased $4.5 million, or 3.5%, over the prior year quarter. This increase in wholesale electric sales primarily reflects higher wholesale prices. Average wholesale sales prices increased 13.8% over the prior year quarter. Long-term contracts revenues increased $0.9 million, or 2.4%, over 2004 due primarily to steady load growth and higher index prices as higher volumes and prices were only partially offset by a slight increase of gas-fired assets in the quarter. Forward sales increased $7.9 million, or 35.0%, compared to the first quarter of 2004, due to increased volumes caused by strong forward sales prices. Short-term sales decreased $4.3 million due to lower volumes as the Company shifted sales from short-term to forward sales. The Company sold wholesale (bulk) power of 2.850 million MWh of electricity for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to 2.981 million MWh for the same period in 2004, a decrease of 4.4%.
The gross margin, or operating revenues minus cost of energy sold and intersegment energy transfer, increased $4.4 million, or 18.0%, over the prior year quarter. Increased plant availability and reductions in purchase power contract prices increased the availability of less expensive excess energy for sale in the wholesale market. While short-term sales decreased, short-term sales margin increased $3.7 million due to this increase in low-cost, excess energy. Long-term sales margin increased $0.1 million due to higher volumes and prices, which were slightly offset by, increased use of gas-fired generation in the first quarter of 2005. Forward contracts margin increased $0.6 million, as forward contracts also benefited from higher prices and volumes. The Company had an unfavorable change in the unrealized mark-to-market position of $0.5 million ($0.9 million loss in 2005 versus $0.4 million loss in 2004).
Total non-fuel O&M decreased $0.3 million, or 2.8%, from the prior year quarter. Energy production costs decreased $0.2 million due to a 2004 planned outage at Four Corners that did not recur in 2005. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $0.2 million due to the addition of new technology platforms that were placed in service in December 2004. The Company expects to see depreciation increase in the future as a result of this increased investment in new technology platforms. Additionally, the Company expects the SJGS Unit Four shutdown to reduce its second quarter electric retail pre-tax earnings by approximately $1.8 million. However, the Company expects to have lower operating costs and recover the lost revenue in the fourth quarter of 2005 when the Unit Four planned outage would have occurred.
66
Consolidated
Other Income and Deductions
Other income increased by $1.4 million or 12.3% due to favorable investment performance in the Company's cash management program. Other deductions decreased $0.3 million due to lower short-term interest costs.
Income Taxes
The Company's consolidated income tax expense was $17.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to $14.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase was due to the impact of higher pre-tax earnings. The Company's effective income tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were 36.05% and 36.47%, respectively.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
As of March 31, 2005, there have been no significant changes with regard to the critical accounting policies disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. The policies disclosed included the accounting for: revenue recognition; regulatory assets and liabilities; asset impairment; pension plan; self-insurance; contingent liabilities and environmental issues.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At March 31, 2005, the Company had cash and short-term investments of $328.8 million compared to $17.2 million in cash and short-term investments at December 31, 2004.
Cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $81.1 million compared to $64.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. This increase in cash flows was due primarily to increased revenues from steady load growth and the gas rate increase. Changes in working capital, including greater efficiency in the management of accounts receivables including the PGAC further increased cash from operations, and were partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable due to higher gas costs in the fourth quarter of 2004.
Cash used for investing activities was $20.9 million for the first three months of 2005 compared to $23.4 million for the first three months of 2004. Utility plant additions, including nuclear fuel, were relatively constant for the comparable periods.
Cash generated by financing activities was $251.4 million for the first three months of 2005 compared to cash used for financing activities of $51.0 million for the first three months of 2004. Cash generated from financing activities in 2005 was due to the issuance of the Equity Units for $239.8 million and the issuance of common stock for $101.2 million, partially offset by repayments of short-term debt. Financing activities in 2004 consisted primarily of short-term debt repayments.
67
Capital Requirements
Total capital requirements include construction expenditures as well as other major capital requirements and cash dividend requirements for both common and preferred stock. The main focus of the Company's current construction program is upgrading generation resources, upgrading and expanding the electric and gas transmission and distribution systems and purchasing nuclear fuel. Projections for total capital requirements for 2005 are $241.0 million with projections for construction expenditures for 2005 constituting $216.0 million of that total. Total capital requirements are projected to be $971.0 million and construction expenditures are projected to be $819.0 million for 2005-2009. These estimates are under continuing review and subject to on-going adjustment. This projection includes $49.0 million for the acquisition and construction of Luna announced on November 12, 2004 and $49.0 million for PNM's estimated share of capital costs for new pollution control technology at SJGS. See "Citizen Suit Under the Clean Air Act" in Note 7, "Commitments and Contingencies" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding the pollution control technology at SJGS. This projection excludes any other generation fleet expansion capital and also excludes any capital requirements that may be required after closing of the proposed TNP acquisition (see "Acquisitions" above). The Company continues to look for appropriately priced generation acquisition and expansion opportunities to support retail electric load growth, the continued expansion of its long-term contract business and to supplement its natural transmission position in the Southwest and West.
During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company utilized cash generated from operations and cash on hand, as well as its liquidity arrangements, to cover its capital requirements and construction expenditures. The Company anticipates that internal cash generation and current debt capacity will be sufficient to meet all of its capital requirements and construction expenditures for the years 2005 through 2009. To cover the difference in the amounts and timing of cash generation and cash requirements, the Company intends to use short-term borrowings under its current and future liquidity arrangements.
Liquidity
As of April 29, 2005, the Holding Company had $415.0 million of liquidity arrangements. The liquidity arrangements consist of $400.0 million from an unsecured revolving credit facility, referred to as the Holding Company Facility for purposes of this discussion, and $15.0 million in local lines of credit. As of April 29, 2005, there were no amounts borrowed against the Holding Company Facility or the local lines of credit.
The Holding Company is currently in the process of establishing a commercial paper program under which it may issue up to $400.0 million in commercial paper for up to 270 days. The commercial paper will be unsecured and the proceeds will be used for short-term cash management needs. The Holding Company Facility will serve as a backstop for the outstanding commercial paper.
As of April 29, 2005, PNM had $393.5 million of liquidity arrangements. The liquidity arrangements consist of $300.0 million from an unsecured revolving credit facility, referred to as the PNM Facility for purposes of this discussion, $70.0 million from an AR Securitization program and $23.5 million in local lines of credit. As of April 29, 2005, there were no amounts borrowed against the PNM Facility, the AR Securitization, or the local lines of credit. At April 29, 2005, PNM also had a $20.0 million borrowing arrangement with the Holding Company, which is not included in the $393.5 million of liquidity arrangements noted above. As of April 29, 2005 there were no amounts outstanding under this arrangement.
68
PNM has a commercial paper program under which PNM may issue up to $300.0 million in commercial paper for up to 365 days. The commercial paper is unsecured and the proceeds are used for short-term cash management needs. The PNM Facility serves as a backstop for the outstanding commercial paper. As of April 29, 2005, PNM had $9.6 million in commercial paper outstanding under this program.
The Company's ability, if required, to access the capital markets at a reasonable cost and to provide for other capital needs is largely dependent upon its ability to earn a fair return on equity, its results of operations, its credit ratings, obtaining required regulatory approvals and financial and wholesale market conditions. Financing flexibility is enhanced by providing a high percentage of total capital requirements from internal sources and having the ability, if necessary, to issue long-term securities and to obtain short-term credit.
The Holding Company's credit outlook was considered stable by Moody's and S&P as of the date of this report. The Company is committed to maintaining or improving its investment grade ratings. In March 2005, S&P and Moody's rated the Holding Company's senior notes issued as part of its equity unit sales (see "Financing Activities" below) "BBB-" and "Baa3", respectively. In April 2005, S&P assigned its "A-2" corporate credit and short-term debt ratings to the Holding Company's planned commercial paper program discussed above.
PNM's credit outlook was considered stable by Moody's and S&P as of the date of this report. Maintaining or improving its investment grade ratings continues to be an important goal of the Company's. As of March 31, 2005, S&P rated PNM's business position as six, its senior unsecured notes as "BBB" with a stable outlook and its preferred stock as "BB+". As of March 31, 2005, Moody's rated PNM's senior unsecured notes as "Baa2" and its preferred stock as "Ba1". In April 2004, S&P assigned its "A-2" corporate credit and short-term debt ratings to PNM's rated commercial paper program. In April 2004, Moody's assigned its "P-2" corporate credit and short-term debt ratings to PNM's rated commercial paper program.
The Company anticipates maintaining its current ratings after the acquisition of TNP is consummated, which is currently anticipated to occur in the second quarter of 2005, although no assurance can be given in this regard.
Investors are cautioned that a security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, that it is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization, and that each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
It is currently anticipated that the Holding Company's Board will maintain the current dividend policy of paying out 50% to 60% of consolidated earnings until its next annual evaluation of dividend policy. The Holding Company's dividend has increased, on average, more than 4.8% over the last three years, with the current annual common stock dividend at $0.74 per share. The Holding Company's Board generally considers the Company's dividend policy on an annual basis; however the Company plans to reexamine its dividend payout percentage after the close of the proposed TNP acquisition.
69
See "Acquisitions" above for additional information related to financing and credit ratings impacts from the proposed acquisition of TNP.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
The Company enters into contracts that require payment of cash over specified periods, based on specified minimum quantities and prices. For an in-depth discussion of the Company's commitments and contractual obligations, see "Commitments and Contractual Obligations" in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. See Note 11 - "Proposed TNP Acquisition" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the Holding Company's agreement to acquire TNP and related financing matters.
Contingent Provisions of Certain Obligations
The Holding Company and PNM have a number of debt obligations and other contractual commitments that contain contingent provisions. Some of these, if triggered, could affect the liquidity of the Company. The Holding Company or PNM could be required to provide security, immediately pay outstanding obligations or be prevented from drawing on unused capacity under certain credit agreements if the contingent requirements were to be triggered. The most significant consequences resulting from these contingent requirements are detailed in the discussion below.
PNM's standard purchase agreement for the procurement of gas for its retail customers contains a contingent requirement that could require PNM to provide security for its gas purchase obligations if the seller were to reasonably believe that PNM was unable to fulfill its payment obligations under the agreement.
The master agreement for the sale of electricity in the WSPP contains a contingent requirement that could require PNM to provide security if its debt were to fall below investment grade rating. The WSPP agreement also contains a contingent requirement, commonly called a material adverse change provision, which could require PNM to provide security if a material adverse change in its financial condition or operations were to occur.
The committed Holding Company Facility contains a "ratings trigger," for pricing purposes only. If the Holding Company is downgraded or upgraded by the ratings agencies, the result would be an increase or decrease in interest cost, respectively. The Holding Company Facility contains a material adverse change provision, which, if triggered, could prevent the Holding Company from drawing on its unused capacity under the Holding Company Facility except for drawing to repay any outstanding commercial paper. In addition, the Holding Company Facility contains a contingent requirement that requires the Holding Company to maintain a debt-to-capital ratio, inclusive of off-balance sheet debt, of less than 65% as well as maintenance of an earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to interest ratio of 2.75 times. If the Holding Company's debt-to-capital ratio, inclusive of off-balance sheet debt, were to exceed 65% or its interest coverage ratio falls below 2.75, it could be required to repay all borrowings under the Holding Company Facility, be prevented from drawing on the unused capacity under the Holding Company Facility, and be required to provide security for all outstanding letters of credit issued under the Holding Company Facility.
70
The committed PNM Facility contains a "ratings trigger," for pricing purposes only. If PNM is downgraded or upgraded by the ratings agencies, the result would be an increase or decrease in interest cost, respectively. The PNM Facility contains a material adverse charge provision, which, if triggered, could prevent PNM from drawing on its unused capacity under the PNM Facility. The material adverse charge provision does allow drawing to repay outstanding commercial paper. In addition, the PNM Facility contains a contingent provision that requires PNM to maintain a debt-to-capital ratio, inclusive of off-balance sheet debt, of less than 65% as well as maintenance of an earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to interest ratio of 3.0 times. If PNM's debt-to-capital ratio, inclusive of off-balance sheet debt, were to exceed 65% or its interest coverage ratio falls below 3.0, PNM could be required to repay all borrowings under the PNM Facility, be prevented from drawing on the unused capacity under the PNM Facility, and be required to provide security for all outstanding letters of credit issued under the PNM Facility.
If a contingent requirement were to be triggered under the PNM Facility resulting in an acceleration of the outstanding loans under the PNM Facility, a cross-default provision in the PVNGS leases could occur if the accelerated amount is not paid. If a cross-default provision is triggered, the lessors have the ability to accelerate their rights under the leases, including acceleration of all future lease payments.
Financing Activities
The Holding Company has two universal shelf registration statements filed with the SEC for the issuance of debt securities and equity securities, preferred stock, purchase contracts, purchase contract units and warrants. As of March 31, 2005, the Holding Company had approximately $400.9 million of remaining unissued securities under these registration statements. In addition, as of March 31, 2005, PNM had approximately $200.0 million of remaining unissued securities registered under its previously filed shelf registration statement.
Effective January 1, 2005, the Holding Company entered into a $50.0 million loan agreement with PNMR Services Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary. In addition, the Holding Company made a $5.0 million equity contribution to PNMR Services Company in January 2005. These steps were taken to provide PNMR Services Company with liquidity for its operations.
The Holding Company has entered into three fixed to floating interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional principal amount of $150.0 million. Under these swaps, the Holding Company receives a 4.40% fixed interest payment on the notional principal amount on a semi-annual basis and pays a floating rate equal to the six month LIBOR plus approximately 58.15 basis points (0.5815%) on the notional amount through September 15, 2008. The initial floating rate was approximately 1.91% and will be reset every six months. The floating rate was reset on March 15, 2005, to approximately 3.84%. The swap is accounted for as a fair-value hedge with a fair-market value (liability position) of approximately $3.1 million as of March 31, 2005.
Common Stock Offering
On March 30, 2005, the Holding Company issued 3,910,000 common stock shares of common stock at $26.76 per share. The Company received net proceeds from this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses, of approximately
71
$101.0 million. The Company plans to use the net proceeds to retire high cost TNP debt and preferred stock (see Note 11 - "Proposed TNP Acquisition"), to complete the construction of Luna, a partially constructed, combined-cycle power plant near Deming, New Mexico and for other general Company purposes. Pending the acquisition and construction activities, the Company invested the net proceeds in investment grade, interest-bearing securities. At March 31, 2005, these net proceeds and the proceeds from the "Equity Unit Offering" discussed below, are included in "Cash and cash equivalents" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet of the Holding Company.
Equity Unit Offering
In March 2005, the Company completed a public offering of 4,945,000 6.75% equity units ("Equity Units"), yielding net proceeds after fees of $239.6 million. The Company plans to use the net proceeds to retire high cost TNP debt and preferred stock in connection with the proposed TNP acquisition, to complete the construction of Luna and for other general corporate purposes. Pending the acquisition and construction activities, the Company invested the net proceeds in investment grade, interest-bearing securities.
Each Equity Unit consists of a purchase contract and a 5.0% individual beneficial ownership interest in one of the Company's senior notes with a stated amount of $1,000, which corresponds to a $50 stated amount of the Company's senior notes. The ownership interest in the senior notes is initially pledged to secure the Corporate Unit holder's obligation to purchase Company common stock under the related purchase contract. The senior notes are scheduled to mature in May 2010 (subject to the remarketing described below) and bear interest at a rate of 4.8% per year. The purchase contracts entitle their holders to contract adjustment payments of 1.95% per year on the stated amount of $50.
Each purchase contract obligates the holder to purchase, and the Company to sell, at a purchase price of $50 in cash, shares of the Company's common stock on or before May 16, 2008 (the "Purchase Contract Settlement Date"). Generally, the number of shares each holder of the Equity Units is obligated to purchase depends on the average closing price per share of Company's common stock over a 20-day trading period ending on the third trading day immediately preceding the Purchase Contract Settlement Date subject to anti-dilution adjustments. If the average closing price for the 20-day trading period is equal to or greater than approximately $32.65 per share, the settlement rate will be 1.5315 shares of common stock. If the average closing price for the trading period is less than approximately $32.65 per share but greater than $26.76 per share, the settlement rate is equal $50 divided by the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the trading period. If the average closing for the trading period price is less than or equal to $26.76 per share, the settlement rate will be 1.8685 shares of common stock. The holders of Equity Units have the option to settle their obligations under the purchase contracts at any time on or prior to the seventh business day immediately preceding the Purchase Contract Settlement Date. Prior to the Purchase Contract Settlement Date, the senior notes will be remarketed. If the remarketing is successful, the interest rate on the senior notes may change to a rate selected by the remarketing agent, and the maturity of the senior notes may be extended to a date selected by the Company, but no later than May 2038. If the remarketing of the senior notes is not successful, the maturity and interest rate of the senior notes will not change and holders of the Equity Units will have the option of putting their senior notes to the Company to satisfy their obligations under the purchase contracts.
72
The purchase contracts are forward transactions in the Company's common stock. Upon issuance, a liability for the present value of the purchase contract adjustment payments of $13.9 million was recorded as a reduction to stockholders' equity, with an offsetting increase to other long-term liabilities and current liabilities. Subsequent contract adjustment payments will reduce this liability. Upon settlement of each purchase contract, the Company will receive the stated amount of $50 on the purchase contract and will issue the requisite number of shares of common stock, which the Company has reserved. The stated amount received will be recorded as an increase to stockholders' equity.
Before the issuance of common stock upon settlement of the purchase contracts, the Equity Units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by SFAS 128. Under this method, the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share (based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period) is deemed to be increased by the excess, if any, of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the Company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement. Therefore, dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the Company's common stock for the reporting period is above approximately $32.65, and will potentially occur when the average price of the Company's common stock for the 20-day trading period preceding the end of the reporting period is lower than the average price of the Company's common stock for the full reporting period. There was no dilution in the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
Depending on its future business strategy, capital needs and market conditions, the Company could enter into additional long-term financings for the purpose of strengthening its balance sheet, funding growth and reducing its cost of capital. The Company continues to evaluate its investment and debt retirement options to optimize its financing strategy and earnings potential. No additional first mortgage bonds may be issued under PNM's mortgage. The amount of senior unsecured notes that may be issued is not limited by the senior unsecured notes indenture. However, debt-to-capital requirements in certain of PNM's financial instruments and regulatory agreements would ultimately limit the amount of additional debt PNM would issue.
Capital Structure
The Company's capitalization, including current maturities of long-term debt, at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 is shown below:
|
|
March 31, |
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Equity |
49.2% |
52.4% |
|
|
Preferred Stock |
0.5% |
0.6% |
|
|
Long‑term Debt |
50.3% |
47.0% |
|
|
Total Capitalization* |
100.0% |
100.0% |
|
* Total capitalization does not include as debt the present value of PNM's operating lease obligations for PVNGS Units 1 and 2, EIP and the Delta operating lease, which was approximately $174.8 million as of March 31, 2005 and $176.0 million as of December 31, 2004.
73
The change in the Company's capitalization is due to the issuance of common stock and Equity Units. Had these issuances been made at December 31, 2004, common equity would have been approximately 49.1%, preferred stock approximately 0.5%, and long-term debt approximately 50.4%.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage risk as it relates to changes in natural gas and electric prices, changes in interest rates and, historically, adverse market changes for investments held by the Company's various trusts. Additionally, the Company uses derivative instruments based on certain financial composite indices as part of its enhanced cash management program. The Company also uses certain derivative instruments for wholesale power marketing transactions in order to take advantage of favorable price movements and market timing activities in the wholesale power markets. The following additional information is provided.
Risk Management
The Company controls the scope of its various forms of risk through a comprehensive set of policies and procedures and oversight by senior level management and the Holding Company Board. The Board's Finance Committee sets the risk limit parameters. The RMC, comprised of corporate and business segment officers and other managers, oversees all of the activities, which include commodity price, credit, equity, interest rate and business risks. The RMC has oversight for the ongoing evaluation of the adequacy of the risk control organization and policies. The Company has a risk control organization, headed by a Risk Manager, which is assigned responsibility for establishing and enforcing the policies, procedures and limits and evaluating the risks inherent in proposed transactions, on an enterprise-wide basis.
The RMC's responsibilities specifically include: establishment of a general policy regarding risk exposure levels and activities in each of the business segments; authority to approve the types of instruments traded; authority to establish a general policy regarding counterparty exposure and limits; authorization and delegation of transaction limits; review and approval of controls and procedures; review and approval of models and assumptions used to calculate mark-to-market and risk exposure; authority to approve and open brokerage and counterparty accounts; review of hedging and risk activities; and quarterly reporting to the Finance Committee and the Holding Company Board on these activities.
The RMC also proposes VAR limits to the Finance Committee. The Finance Committee ultimately sets the Company's VAR limits.
It is the responsibility of each business segment to create its own control procedures and policies within the parameters established by the Finance Committee. The RMC reviews and approves these policies, which are created with the assistance of the Corporate Controller, Director of Internal Audit and the Director of Financial Risk Management. Each business segment's policies address the following controls: authorized risk exposure limits; authorized instruments and markets; authorized personnel; policies on segregation of duties; policies on mark-to-market accounting; responsibilities for deal capture; confirmation procedures; responsibilities for reporting results; statement on the role of derivative transactions; and limits on individual transaction size (nominal value).
74
To the extent an open position exists, fluctuating commodity prices can impact financial results and financial position, either favorably or unfavorably. As a result, the Company cannot predict with certainty the impact that its risk management decisions may have on its businesses, operating results or financial position.
Commodity Risk
Marketing and procurement of energy often involves market risks associated with managing energy commodities and establishing open positions in the energy markets, primarily on a short-term basis. These risks fall into three different categories: price and volume volatility, credit risk of counterparties and adequacy of the control environment. PNM routinely enters into forward contracts, option agreements and price basis swap agreements to hedge price and volume risk on its purchase and sale commitments, fuel requirements and to enhance returns and minimize the risk of market fluctuations on the Wholesale Operations.
The Company's Wholesale Operations, including long-term contracts, forward sales and short-term sales, are managed primarily through a net asset-backed marketing strategy, whereby PNM's aggregate net open forward contract position is covered by its forecasted excess generation capabilities. PNM is exposed to market risk if its generation capabilities were disrupted or if its retail load requirements were greater than anticipated. If PNM were required to cover all or a portion of its net open contract position, it would have to meet its commitments through market purchases.
Under the derivative accounting rules and the related accounting rules for energy contracts, the Company accounts for its various financial derivative instruments for the purchase and sale of energy differently based on management's intent when entering into the contract. Energy contracts that meet the definition of a derivative under SFAS 133 and do not qualify for a normal purchase or sale designation are recorded on the balance sheet at fair market value at each period end. The changes in fair market value are recognized in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Should an energy transaction qualify as a hedge under SFAS 133, fair market value changes from year to year are recognized on the balance sheet with a corresponding charge to other comprehensive income. Gains or losses are recognized when the hedged transaction settles. Derivatives that meet the normal sales and purchases exceptions within SFAS 133 are not marked to market but rather recorded in results of operations when the underlying transaction settles.
75
The following table shows the net fair value of mark-to-market energy contracts included in the balance sheet:
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
(In thousands) |
|||
Mark-to-Market Energy Contracts: |
|||
Current asset |
$ 10,194 |
$ 6,890 |
|
Long-term asset |
4,291 |
316 |
|
Total mark-to-market assets |
14,485 |
7,206 |
|
Current liability |
(8,079) |
(5,007) |
|
Long-term liability |
(3,410) |
(126) |
|
Total mark-to-market liabilities |
(11,489) |
(5,133) |
|
Net fair value of mark-to-market energy contracts |
$ 2,996 |
$ 2,073 |
The mark-to-market energy transactions represent net assets at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 after netting all applicable open purchase and sale contracts.
The market prices used to value PNM's mark-to-market energy transactions are based on index prices and broker quotations. Generally, market data to value these transactions is available for the next 18-month period only; the remaining time period, referred to as the illiquid period, is valued using internally developed pricing data. As a result, the Company records liquidity reserves on these contracts for market gains and losses in the illiquid period, effectively limiting the mark-to-market valuation to a rolling 18-month period. The Company regularly assesses the validity and availability of pricing data for the illiquid period of its derivative transactions and adjusts its liquidity reserves, accordingly.
The following table provides detail of changes in the Company's mark-to-market energy transactions' net asset or liability balance sheet position from one period to the next:
|
Three Months Ended |
||
|
March 31, |
||
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
(In thousands) |
|||
Sources of Fair Value Gain/(Loss) |
|||
Fair value at beginning of year |
$ 2,073 |
$ 433 |
|
Amount realized on contracts delivered |
|||
during period |
67 |
411 |
|
Changes in fair value |
856 |
1,349 |
|
Net fair value at end of period |
$ 2,996 |
$ 2,193 |
|
Net change recorded as mark-to-market |
$ 923 |
$ 1,760 |
76
The following table provides the maturity of the net assets/(liabilities) of the Company, giving an indication of when these mark-to-market amounts will settle and generate/(use) cash. The following values were determined using broker quotes:
Fair Value at March 31, 2005
Maturities |
||||||
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year |
|
1-3 Years |
|
4+ Years |
|
Total |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
||
$2,084 |
$485 |
$427 |
$2,996 |
As of March 31, 2005, a decrease in market pricing of PNM's mark-to-market energy transactions by 10% would have resulted in a decrease in net earnings of less than 1%. Conversely, an increase in market pricing of these transactions by 10% would have resulted in an increase in net earnings of less than 1%.
The Company measures the market risk of these long-term contracts and wholesale activities using a VAR calculation to maintain the Company's total exposure within management-prescribed limits. The Company's VAR calculation reports the possible market loss for the respective transactions. This calculation is based on the transaction's fair market value on the reporting date. Accordingly, the VAR calculation is not a measure of the potential accounting mark-to-market loss. In 2005, the Company adopted the Monte Carlo simulation model of VAR. The Monte Carlo model utilizes a random generated simulation based on historical volatility to generate portfolio values. The Company continues to utilize the two-tailed confidence level at 99%. VAR models are relatively sophisticated. The quantitative risk information, however, is limited by the parameters established in creating the model. The instruments being evaluated may trigger a potential loss in excess of calculated amounts if changes in commodity prices exceed the confidence level of the model used. The VAR methodology employs the following critical parameters: volatility estimates, market values of open positions, appropriate market-oriented holding periods and seasonally adjusted correlation estimates. The Company's VAR calculation considers the Company's forward position for the next eighteen months. The Company uses a holding period of three days as the estimate of the length of time that will be needed to liquidate the positions. The volatility and the correlation estimates measure the impact of adverse price movements both at an individual position level as well as at the total portfolio level. The two-tailed confidence level established is 99%. For example, if VAR is calculated at $10.0 million, it is estimated at a 99% confidence level that if prices move against PNM's positions, the Company's pre-tax gain or loss in liquidating the portfolio would not exceed $10.0 million in the three days that it would take to liquidate the portfolio.
The Company's VAR is regularly monitored by the Company's RMC. The RMC has put in place procedures to ensure that increases in VAR are reviewed and, if deemed necessary, acted upon to reduce exposures. The VAR represents an estimate of the potential gains or losses that could be recognized on PNM's wholesale power marketing portfolios given current volatility in the market, and is not necessarily indicative of actual results that may occur, since actual future gains and losses will differ from those estimated. Actual gains and losses may differ due to actual fluctuations in market prices, operating exposures, and the timing thereof, as well as changes to PNM's wholesale power marketing portfolios during the year.
77
In 2005, the Company revised its methodologies for calculating VAR in order to improve its ability to measure and manage risk. As a result, the Company also revised its VAR limits to be consistent with the new methodologies. As previously discussed, the Company adopted the Monte Carlo statistical simulation approach. In addition, the Company redefined the types of transactions on which it measures VAR. The total VAR is now based solely on its merchant activities and excludes all effects from the retail operations and the joint dispatch model employed by the Company. The total VAR limit established is $18.0 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the average total VAR amount was $10.1 million, with high and low VAR amounts for the period of $13.5 million and $4.0 million, respectively. The total VAR amount at March 31, 2005 was $12.3 million. In addition, the Company defined a sub-set of the total VAR that captures all transactions that are not directly asset related and have economic risk. The VAR limit established for these transactions is $5.0 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the average VAR amount for these transactions was $0.3 million, with high and low VAR amounts for the period of $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The VAR amount for these transactions at March 31, 2005 was $0.4 million.
In 2004, the Company utilized the variance/covariance model of VAR, which is a probabilistic model that measures the risk of loss to earnings in market sensitive instruments. The variance/covariance model relies on statistical relationships to analyze how changes in different markets can affect a portfolio of instruments with different characteristics and market exposure. For the three months ended March 31, 2004 the Company's average total VAR amount as reported was $11.8 million, with high and low VAR amounts for the period of $16.7 million and $9.5 million, respectively. The total VAR amount at March 31, 2004 was $16.7 million. In the prior year the Company also measured VAR for a subset of transactions that were marked-to-market in accordance with SFAS 133. The VAR limit established for these transactions was $2.0 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, the average VAR amount for these transactions was $0.1 million, with high and low VAR amounts for the period of $0.2 million and $0, respectively. The total VAR amount at March 31, 2004 was $0.1 million. Because of the nature of the Monte Carlo simulation method now utilized by the Company, reporting of the 2004 VAR amounts using the Company's new approach is neither practical nor representational of the Company's management of risk in 2004.
Credit Risk
PNM is exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance or non-payment by counterparties. The Company uses a credit management process to assess and monitor the financial conditions of counterparties. Credit exposure is also regularly monitored by the RMC. The Company provides for losses due to market and credit risk. PNM's credit risk with its largest counterparty as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was $39.3 million and $26.2 million, respectively.
The following table provides information related to PNM's credit exposure as of March 31, 2005. The Company does not hold any credit collateral as of March 31, 2005. The table further delineates that exposure by the credit worthiness (credit rating) of the counterparties and provides guidance as to the concentration of credit risk to individual counterparties PNM may have. Also provided is an indication of the maturity of a company's credit risk by credit ratings of the counterparties.
78
Schedule of
Wholesale Operations Credit Risk Exposure
Net |
||||||
(b) |
Number |
Exposure |
||||
Net |
of |
of |
||||
Credit |
Counter |
Counter- |
||||
Risk |
-parties |
parties |
||||
Rating (a) |
Exposure |
>10% |
>10% |
|||
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||
Investment grade |
$84,252 |
2 |
$51,996 |
|||
Non-investment grade |
1,427 |
- |
- |
|||
Internal ratings |
||||||
Investment grade |
67 |
- |
- |
|||
Non-investment grade |
3,622 |
- |
- |
|||
Total |
$89,368 |
$51,996 |
(a) Rating - Included in "Investment Grade" are counterparties with a minimum S&P rating of BBB- or Moody's rating of Baa3. If the counterparty has provided a guarantee by a higher rated entity (e.g., its parent), determination is based on the rating of its guarantor. The category "Internal Ratings - Investment Grade" includes those counterparties that are internally rated as investment grade in accordance with the guidelines established in the Company's credit policy.
(b) The Net Credit Risk Exposure is the net credit exposure to PNM from its Wholesale Operations. This includes long-term contracts, forward sales and short-term sales. The exposure captures the net amounts due to PNM from receivables/payables for realized transactions, delivered and unbilled revenues, and mark-to-market gains/losses (pursuant to contract terms). Exposures are offset according to legally enforceable netting arrangements and reduced by credit collateral. Credit collateral includes cash deposits, letters of credit and performance bonds received from counterparties. Amounts are presented before those reserves that are determined on a portfolio basis.
Maturity of Credit
Risk Exposure
As of March 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Less than |
|
|
Net |
||
Rating |
|
2 Years |
|
2-5 Years |
|
Exposure |
(In thousands) |
||||||
Investment grade |
$84,052 |
$200 |
$84,252 |
|||
Non-investment grade |
1,427 |
- |
1,427 |
|||
Internal ratings |
||||||
Investment grade |
67 |
- |
67 |
|||
Non-investment grade |
3,622 |
- |
3,622 |
|||
Total |
$89,168 |
$200 |
$89,368 |
79
Natural Gas Supply Contracts
PNM hedges certain portions of natural gas supply contracts in order to protect its retail customers from adverse price fluctuations in the natural gas market. The financial impact of all hedge gains and losses, including the related costs of the program, is recoverable through the PGAC. As a result, earnings are not affected by gains and losses generated by these instruments.
In order to protect its natural gas customers from the risk of rising prices during the 2005-2006 heating season, in total, PNM plans to expend approximately $7.2 million in 2005 to purchase gas options that essentially cap the amount the Company would pay for each volume of gas subject to the options during the winter heating season. PNM expects to recover its option premiums as a component of the PGAC during the months of October 2005 through February 2006.
Interest Rate Risk
PNM has long-term debt which subjects it to the risk of loss associated with movements in market interest rates. The majority of the Company's long-term debt is fixed-rate debt, and therefore, does not expose the Company's earnings to a major risk of loss due to adverse changes in market interest rates. However, the fair value of all long-term debt instruments would increase by approximately 4.85%, or $50.2 million, if interest rates were to decline by 50 basis points from their levels at March 31, 2005. As of March 31, 2005, the fair value of PNM's long-term debt was $1.04 billion as compared to a book-value of $987.1 million. In general, an increase in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows to the extent not recoverable in rates if PNM were to re-acquire all or a portion of its debt instruments in the open market prior to their maturity.
During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company contributed cash of approximately $1.5 million to other post retirement benefits for plan year 2005. The securities held by the trusts had an estimated fair value of $596.9 million as of March 31, 2005, of which approximately 28% were fixed-rate debt securities that subject the Company to risk of loss of fair value with movements in market interest rates. If rates were to increase by 50 basis points from their levels at March 31, 2005, the decrease in the fair value of the securities would be 2.8% or $4.7 million. PNM does not currently recover or return through rates any losses or gains on these securities. The Company, therefore, is at risk for shortfalls in its funding of its obligations due to investment losses. The Company does not believe that long-term market returns over the period of funding will be less than required for the Company to meet its obligations. However, this belief is based on assumptions about future returns that are inherently uncertain.
Equity Market Risk
PNM contributes to trusts established to fund its share of the decommissioning costs of PVNGS and pension and other postretirement benefits. The trusts hold certain equity securities as of March 31, 2005. These equity securities also expose the Company to losses in fair value. Approximately 60% of the securities held by the various trusts were equity securities as of March 31, 2005. Similar to the debt securities held for funding decommissioning and certain pension and other postretirement costs, PNM does not recover or earn a return through rates on any losses or gains on these equity securities.
80
The Company has a cash management structure that includes a preferred stock dividend capture strategy and various absolute return strategies that have the objective of achieving returns higher than that associated with cash management plans and with bond like volatility. The Company's initial investment in the enhanced cash management program was $10.0 million and an additional $2.0 million was invested in February 2005. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the balance in this investment, including profits and interest, was $13.1 million and $10.6 million, respectively.
OTHER ISSUES FACING THE COMPANY
See Note 7 - "Commitments and Contingencies", in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
There have been no new accounting standards that materially affected the Company this period. See Note 12 - "New Accounting Standards", in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 1 - "Summary of the Business and Significant Accounting Policies - Stock Based Compensation", in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share Based Payment" .
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements made in this filing that relate to future events or the Company's expectations, projections, estimates, intentions, goals, targets and strategies, both with respect to the Company and with respect to the proposed acquisition of TNP, are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers are cautioned that all forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and estimates and the Company assumes no obligation to update this information.
Because actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, the Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on these statements. The Company's business, financial condition, cash flow and operating results are influenced by many factors, which are often beyond the Company's control, that can cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors include:
The potential unavailability of cash at TNPE,
Risks and uncertainties relating to the receipt of SEC and NMPRC approvals for the proposed acquisition of TNP,
The risk that the businesses will not be integrated successfully,
The risk that the benefits of the TNP transaction will not be fully realized or will take longer to realize than expected,
Disruption from the TNP transaction making it more difficult to maintain relationships with customers, employees, suppliers or other third parties,
Changing conditions in the financial markets relevant to the proposed TNP acquisition,
Fluctuations in interest rates,
Weather,
81
Water supply,
Changes in fuel costs,
Availability of fuel supplies,
The effectiveness of risk management and commodity risk transactions,
Seasonality and other changes in supply and demand in the market for electric power,
Variability of wholesale power prices,
Volatility in market liquidity,
Changes in the competitive environment in the electric and natural gas industries,
The performance of generating units and transmission systems,
The ability of the Company to secure long-term power sales,
The risks associated with completion of construction of Luna, including construction delays and unanticipated cost overruns,
State and federal regulatory and legislative decisions and actions,
The outcome of legal proceedings,
Changes in applicable accounting principles,
The performance of state, regional and national economies, and
The other factors described in "Risk Factors" in this report.
See also "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk" above for information about the risks associated with the Company's use of derivative financial instruments.
SECURITIES ACT DISCLAIMER
Certain securities to be issued in connection with the TNP acquisition transaction and commercial paper described in this report have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or any state securities laws and may not be reoffered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and applicable state securities laws. This report does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.
82
RISK FACTORS
The Company's business and financial results are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those set forth below and under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this report.
The Company may not be able to complete its acquisition of TNP. If the Company does not complete the acquisition, dilution to its earnings per share may result.
In July 2004, the Company announced its proposed $1.024 billion acquisition of TNP. Although the Company has received anti-trust clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and PUCT and FERC approval, the proposed TNP acquisition remains subject to approvals of the NMPRC and the SEC, and other customary closing conditions.
In March 2005, the FERC voted to approve the planned acquisition by the Holding Company of the securities of TNP. The FERC reviewed the proposed transaction under the FERC's Merger Policy Statement, to determine whether it is consistent with the public interest by applying a three-part test. Specifically, the FERC examined the effect of the proposed transaction on: (1) competition, (2) rates, and (3) regulation. Based on its review, the FERC determined that the proposed transaction is consistent with the public interest.
Although the Company expects to complete the transaction in the second quarter of 2005, the Company cannot be certain that all of the required approvals will be obtained, or that it will have raised sufficient additional capital or that the other closing conditions will be satisfied, within that time frame, if at all, or without terms and conditions that may have a material adverse effect on its operations. If the Company is unable to complete the proposed TNP acquisition, any issuance of common stock in anticipation of the acquisition will result in dilution to the Company's earnings per share unless the Company is able to avoid or mitigate such dilution.
The Company may fail to successfully integrate acquisitions, including TNP, into its other businesses or otherwise fail to achieve the anticipated benefits of pending and future acquisitions.
As part of the Company's growth strategy, the Company is pursuing, and intends to continue to pursue, a disciplined acquisition strategy. While the Company expects to identify potential synergies, cost savings, and growth opportunities prior to the acquisition and integration of acquired companies or assets, the Company may not be able to achieve these anticipated benefits due to, among other things:
delays or difficulties in completing the integration of acquired companies or assets
higher than expected costs or a need to allocate resources to manage unexpected operating difficulties
diversion of the attention and resources of its management
reliance on inaccurate assumptions in evaluating the expected benefits of a given acquisition
83
inability to retain key employees or key customers of acquired companies
assumption of liabilities unrecognized in the due diligence process
With respect to the proposed TNP acquisition, the Company cannot assure that it will be able to successfully integrate TNP with the Company's current businesses. The integration of TNP with the Company's other businesses will present significant challenges and, as a result, the Company may not be able to operate the combined company as effectively as expected. Also, even if PNM manages to realize greater than anticipated benefits from the integration of TNP into its business, as a regulated entity, PNM may be required by its regulators to return these benefits to its ratepayers. In connection with the Texas and New Mexico settlements relating to the proposed TNP acquisition, for example, the Company agreed to provide ratepayers in Texas and New Mexico with rate credits over various periods of time resulting from anticipated synergy savings from the acquisition. The Company may also fail to achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition as quickly or as cost-effectively as anticipated or may not be able to achieve those benefits at all.
While the Company expects that this acquisition will be accretive to earnings and cash flow in the first full year of operation after the transaction is completed, this expectation is based on important assumptions, including assumptions related to interest rates, market prices for power, its ability to achieve operational benefits from operating the companies as a unified operation and the percentage of TNP's customers that the Company will be able to retain, which may ultimately be incorrect. In addition, the agreement the Company has entered into with the PUCT staff and others relating to the proposed TNP acquisition includes a two-year electric rate freeze and a $13.0 million annual rate reduction in TNMP's retail delivery rates effective May 1, 2005, which could adversely affect profitability if costs at TNMP are not controlled. Additionally, the agreement entered into with the NMPRC staff and others provides TNMP's New Mexico electric customers with a three-phase 15% rate reduction to begin January 2006 and end December 2010. As a result, if the Company is unable to integrate its businesses with TNP effectively or achieve the benefits anticipated, the Company's business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity may be materially adversely affected.
The Company is subject to complex government regulation, which may have a negative impact on its business, financial position and results of operations.
The Company is subject to comprehensive regulation by several federal, state and local regulatory agencies, which significantly influences the Company's operating environment and may affect the Company's ability to recover costs from utility customers. In particular, the NMPRC, the SEC, the FERC, the NRC, the EPA, and the NMED regulate many aspects of its utility operations, including siting and construction of facilities, conditions of service, the issuance of securities, and the rates that the Company can charge customers. The Company is required to have numerous permits, approvals and certificates from these agencies to operate its business. The rates that the Company's principal subsidiary, PNM, is allowed to charge for its retail services are the single most important item influencing the Company's business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity. As discussed below, PNM is subject to a rate freeze providing for no changes in retail electric rates through December 31, 2007, subject to limited exceptions.
84
As a public utility holding company, the Company is subject to regulation by the SEC under PUHCA. The rules and regulations promulgated under PUHCA impose a number of restrictions on the operations of registered public utility holding companies and their subsidiaries. These restrictions include a requirement that, subject to a number of exceptions, the SEC approve in advance securities issuances, acquisitions and dispositions of utility assets or of securities of utility companies, and acquisitions of other businesses. PUHCA also generally limits the operations of a registered public utility holding company to a single integrated public utility system, plus additional energy-related businesses. PUCHA requires that transactions between affiliated companies in a registered holding company system be performed at cost, with limited exceptions.
The Company is unable to predict the impact on its business and operating results from the future regulatory activities of any of these agencies. Changes in regulations or the imposition of additional regulations may require the Company to incur additional expenses or change business operations, and therefore may have an adverse impact on the Company's results of operations. Because of pending federal regulatory reforms, the public utility industry is undergoing a fundamental change. New Mexico repealed the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999 in 2003 and abandoned its plans to transform the industry from one of vertically integrated monopolies to one with deregulated, competitive generation. However, the FERC has proposed a standard market design, which would establish independently governed regional transmission organizations with common rules for market operations. The FERC's efforts have been opposed by a number of states, primarily in the Southeast and the West, because of concern that the standard market design does not provide for regional differences and does not represent a cost-efficient approach to wholesale markets. Energy legislation, which could affect the FERC's activities, remains under consideration in Congress. In 2003, in an attempt to ease concerns with its standard market design proposal, the FERC issued a white paper defining a wholesale power market platform which would replace the standard market design. Both the standard market design and wholesale power market platform proposals are still pending further action by the FERC. The Company's future results will be impacted by the form of the FERC rules, if adopted, the costs of complying with rules and legislation that may call for regulatory reforms for the industry, and the resulting market prices for electricity and natural gas.
PNM's retail electric rate reduction and retail electric rate freeze could adversely affect its profit margin if it does not control costs.
With NMPRC approval, PNM agreed to decrease its retail electric rates by 6.5% in two phases as follows: 4% effective September 1, 2003, and an additional 2.5% effective September 1, 2005. PNM also agreed to freeze these reduced retail electric rates through December 31, 2007. PNM's costs, however, are not frozen. Thus, PNM's ability to maintain its profit margins depends upon increased demand for electricity and PNM's efforts to control costs incurred in supplying that electricity, including, in particular, its coal costs.
PNM does not have the benefit of a fuel adjustment clause for its retail electric operations that would allow it to recover increased fuel and purchased power costs from customers. In addition, as part of the New Mexico settlement relating to the proposed TNP acquisition, TNMP's current fuel and purchased power adjustment clauses will be eliminated no later than March 31, 2006. Therefore, to the extent that PNM has not hedged its fuel and power costs, it is exposed to changes in fuel and power prices to the extent fuel for its electric generating facilities
85
The Company is not able to predict what rate treatment PNM will receive following the expiration of the retail electric rate freeze in New Mexico. Some of the factors that influence rates are largely outside the Company's control. In response to competitive, economic, political, legislative and/or regulatory pressures PNM may have to agree to further rate freezes, rate refunds or rate reductions, any or all of which could have a significant adverse effect on the Company's business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.
The Company is currently the subject of several regulatory proceedings and named in multiple lawsuits with respect to the Company's participation in western energy markets.
The FERC is conducting industry-wide proceedings and investigations related to the alleged dysfunctions of the organized California market and the Pacific Northwest market during 2000 and 2001. In September 2002, an ALJ conducted hearings regarding sales into the California wholesale electric market by PNM and others in 2000 and 2001. The ALJ then issued "Proposed Findings on California Refund Liability" in December 2002, determining that the Cal ISO had, for the most part, correctly calculated the amounts of potential refunds owed by sellers. In March 2003, the FERC issued an order substantially adopting the ALJ's findings, but requiring a change to the formula used to calculate refunds, which would have the effect of increasing PNM's refund liability. In September 2004, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in one of the lead appellate cases addressing the FERC's refund order. The Ninth Circuit upheld the FERC's authority to establish the market-based rate framework under the Federal Power Act, but held that the FERC violated its administrative discretion by declining to investigate whether it should order refunds from sellers who failed to provide transaction-specific reports to the FERC as required by its rules. The Ninth Circuit determined that the FERC has the authority to order refunds for these transactions if it elects to do so and remanded the case to the FERC for further proceedings, including a determination as to whether additional refunds are appropriate. PNM participated with other competitive sellers requesting rehearing en banc by the Ninth Circuit, which is still pending. Additional appeals are still pending before the Ninth Circuit, including CPUC vs FERC , a case addressing the scope of market transactions subject to refund. PNM has participated in this appeal as one of the members of the competitive sellers group. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any FERC proceeding that may result from these appeals, or whether PNM will be ultimately directed to make any additional future refunds as the result of the decision; however, the Company has recorded a reserve for this contingency.
86
For the proceedings related to the Pacific Northwest market, in June 2003, the FERC denied the request of certain parties for retroactive refunds for spot market sales. In November 2003, the Port of Seattle filed an appeal of the FERC's order denying rehearing in the Ninth Circuit, which is still pending. As a participant in the proceedings before the FERC, the Company is also participating in the appeal proceedings. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this appeal, or whether PNM will ultimately be directed to make any refunds.
In March 2002, the California Attorney General filed a complaint with the FERC against numerous sellers regarding prices for wholesale electric sales into the Cal ISO and Cal PX markets and to the California Department of Water Resources. PNM was among the sellers identified in this complaint and filed its answer and motion to intervene. In its answer, PNM defended its pricing and challenged the theory of liability underlying the California Attorney General's complaint. In May 2002, the FERC entered an order denying the California Attorney General's request to initiate a refund proceeding, but directed sellers, including PNM, to comply with additional reporting requirements with regard to certain wholesale power transactions. PNM has made filings required by the May 2002 order. The California Attorney General filed a petition for review in the Ninth Circuit. PNM intervened in the Ninth Circuit appeal and participated as a party in that proceeding. As noted above, in September 2004, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision upholding the FERC's authority to establish the market-based rate framework under the Federal Power Act, but held that the FERC violated its administrative discretion by declining to investigate whether it should order refunds from sellers who failed to provide transaction-specific reports to the FERC as required by its rules. The Ninth Circuit determined that the FERC has the authority to order refunds for these transactions if it elects to do so and remanded the case back to the FERC for further proceedings, including a determination as to whether additional refunds are appropriate. PNM participated with other competitive sellers requesting rehearing en banc by the Ninth Circuit, which is still pending. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the FERC proceeding on remand, or whether PNM will be ultimately directed to make any additional refunds as the result of the decision. As addressed below, the California Attorney General has also threatened litigation against PNM in state court in California based on similar allegations.
In June 2004, PNM received notice that PNM has been included in a list of 56 defendants that have been sued by the City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities in federal district court in the State of Washington. PNM has been listed in a class of defendants referred to as the "Trading Defendants", who allegedly engaged in buying, selling and marketing power in California and other locations in the Western United States. The complaint alleges the Trading Defendants acted in concert among themselves and with "Non-Defendant Trading Co-Conspirators" that were engaged in conduct that amounted to "market manipulations", which the complaint defines as a pattern of activities that had the purpose and effect of creating the impression that the demand for power was higher, the supply of power was lower, or both, than was in fact the case. The complaint identified specific conduct that allegedly amounted to "market manipulations", including the submission of false information and misrepresentation regarding load schedules, bids, power supply, transmission congestion, source and destination of energy, the supply and provision of energy and ancillary services. The complaint alleged the activities of the Trading Defendants, along with "Generator Defendants", who are defined as
87
generators who generated power for sale into California and other Western markets, and the co-conspirators, resulted in substantially increased prices for energy in the Pacific Northwest spot market in excess of what otherwise would have been the price absent such unlawful acts, in violation of antitrust laws. The complaint asserted damages in excess of $175.0 million from the multiple defendants. As a result, PNM joined a motion to dismiss the City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities complaint given Ninth Circuit precedent. In a decision issued in February 2005, the district court judge in the case granted defendants' motion to dismiss. As a result, the antitrust lawsuit against PNM filed by the City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities was dismissed. In March 2005, the City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities filed an appeal in the Ninth Circuit contesting the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint. PNM will participate in the appeal in support of the dismissal. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this appeal, or whether the Company will be required to make any refunds or pay damages as a result of this litigation.
There are inherent risks in the operation of nuclear facilities, such as environmental, health and financial risks and the risk of terrorist attack.
PNM has a 10.2% undivided interest in PVNGS, with portions of its interests in Units 1 and 2 held under leases. PVNGS is subject to environmental, health and financial risks such as the ability to dispose of spent nuclear fuel, the ability to maintain adequate reserves for decommissioning, potential liabilities arising out of the operation of these facilities, and the costs of securing the facilities against possible terrorist attacks and unscheduled outages due to equipment and other problems. PNM maintains nuclear decommissioning trust funds and external insurance coverage to minimize its financial exposure to some of these risks; however, it is possible that damages could exceed the amount of insurance coverage. Although the decommissioning trust funds are designed to provide adequate funds for decommissioning at the end of the expected life of the PVNGS units, there is the risk of insufficient decommissioning trust funds in the event of early decommissioning of the units.
The NRC has broad authority under federal law to impose licensing and safety-related requirements for the operation of nuclear generation facilities. In the event of non-compliance, the NRC has the authority to impose fines or shut down a unit, or both, depending upon its assessment of the severity of the situation, until compliance is achieved. In addition, if a serious nuclear incident were to occur at PVNGS, it could materially and adversely affect the Company's business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity. A major incident at a nuclear facility anywhere in the world could cause the NRC to limit or prohibit the operation or licensing of any domestic nuclear unit. Each PVNGS lease describes certain events, including "Events of Loss" or "Deemed Loss Events", the occurrence of which could require PNM to, among other things, (i) pay the lessor and the equity investor, in return for the investor's interest in PVNGS, cash in the amount provided in the lease and (ii) assume debt obligations relating to the PVNGS lease. The "Events of Loss" generally relate to casualties, accidents and other events at PVNGS, which would severely, adversely affect the ability of the operating agent, APS, to operate, and the ability of PNM to earn a return on its interests in, PVNGS. The "Deemed Loss Events" consist mostly of legal and regulatory changes (such as changes in law making the sale and leaseback transactions illegal, or changes in law making the lessors liable for nuclear decommissioning obligations). The Company believes that the probability of such "Events of Loss" or "Deemed Loss Events" occurring is remote for the following reasons: (i) to a large extent, prevention of "Events of Loss" and some "Deemed Loss Events" is within the control of the PVNGS participants, including the Company, and the PVNGS operating agent,
88
through the general PVNGS operational and safety oversight process and (ii) with respect to other "Deemed Loss Events," which would involve a significant change in current law and policy, the Company is unaware of any pending proposals or proposals being considered for introduction in Congress, or in any state legislative or regulatory body that, if adopted, would cause any of those events.
The Company's financial performance may be adversely affected if its power plants and transmission and distribution system are not successfully operated.
The Company's financial performance depends on the successful operation of its generation, transmission and distribution assets. Unscheduled or longer than expected maintenance outages, other performance problems with the Company's electric generation assets, severe weather conditions, accidents and other catastrophic events, disruptions in the delivery of fuel and other factors could reduce its excess generation capacity and therefore limit the Company's ability to opportunistically sell excess power in the wholesale market. Diminished generation capacity could also result in the Company's aggregate net open forward electric sales position being larger than its forecasted generation capacity. If this were to occur, The Company would have to make purchases of electricity in the wholesale market under contracts priced at the time of execution or, if in the spot market, at the then-current market price. There can be no assurance that sufficient electricity would be available at reasonable prices, or at all, if such a situation were to occur. Failures of transmission or distribution facilities may also cause interruptions in the services the Company provides. These potential generation, distribution and transmission problems, and any potentially related service interruptions, could result in lost revenues and additional costs.
The Company's counterparties may not meet their obligations to us.
The Company is exposed to risk that counterparties, which owe the Company money, energy or other commodities or services, will not be able to perform their obligations. The possibility that certain counterparties may fail to perform their obligations has increased due to financial difficulties, in some cases brought on by improper or illegal accounting and business practices, affecting some participants in the energy industry. Should the counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, the Company might be forced to honor the underlying commitment at then-current market prices. In such event, the Company might incur losses in addition to amounts, if any, already paid to the counterparties.
The Company's operations are subject to risks beyond its control that may reduce its revenues.
The Company's revenues are affected by the demand for electricity and natural gas. That demand can vary greatly based upon:
weather conditions, seasonality and temperature extremes,
fluctuations in economic activity and growth in the Company's service area and the Western region of the United States, and
the extent of additional energy available from current or new competitors.
89
Weather conditions will impact the revenues that the Company obtains from its electric wholesale sales. Very warm and very cold temperatures, especially for prolonged periods, can dramatically increase the demand for electricity for cooling and heating, respectively, as opposed to the effect of more moderate temperatures. Very warm temperatures inside the Company's service territory reduce the amount of power available to sell on the wholesale market.
Drought conditions in New Mexico generally, and especially in the Four Corners region, in which the San Juan Generating Station and the Four Corners Generating Station are located, may affect the water supply for the Company's generating plants. If adequate precipitation is not received in the watershed that supplies the Four Corners areas, the Company may have to decrease generation at these plants, which would reduce the Company's ability to sell excess power on the wholesale market and reduce its revenues. As such, if the drought conditions continue or regulators or legislators take action to limit the Company's supply of water, the Company's business may be adversely impacted. Although the Company has been able to maintain adequate access to water in the past, the Company cannot be certain that it will be able to do so in the future.
An inability to raise capital could limit the Company's ability to execute its growth strategy and finance its capital requirements, which could adversely affect the Company's business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.
The Company relies on access to both short-term money markets and longer-term capital markets as a source of liquidity for any capital requirements not satisfied by the cash flow from our operations, which could include capital requirements for energy infrastructure investments and funding new projects. If the Company is not able to access capital at competitive rates or at all, the Company's ability to implement its growth strategy and its ability to finance capital requirements, if needed, will be limited. Market disruptions or any downgrade of the Company's credit rating may increase its cost of borrowing or adversely affect the Company's ability to raise capital through the issuance of securities or other borrowing arrangements, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity. These disruptions could include:
an economic downturn,
changes in capital markets conditions generally,
the bankruptcy of an unrelated energy company,
increased market prices for electricity and gas,
terrorist attacks or threatened attacks on Company facilities or those of unrelated energy companies, and
deterioration in the overall health of the utility industry.
A significant reduction in the Company's credit ratings could materially and adversely affect its business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.
90
The Company cannot be sure that any of its current ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. Any downgrade:
could increase the Company's borrowing costs, which would diminish its financial results,
could require the Company to pay a higher interest rate in future financings and the potential pool of investors and funding sources could decrease,
could increase borrowing costs under certain of the Company's existing credit facilities,
could also require the Company to provide additional support in the form of letters of credit or cash or other collateral to various counterparties,
could limit access to the commercial paper market, and
below investment grade credit ratings would also require approvals from the NMPRC for new wholesale plant projects and for continuing to participate in wholesale plant projects of more than a certain dollar value and under certain conditions.
The ratings from rating agencies reflect only the views of such rating agencies and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold our securities. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Any downgrade or withdrawal of the Company's current ratings may have an adverse effect on the market price of its outstanding debt.
Costs of environmental compliance, liabilities and litigation could exceed the Company's estimates which could adversely affect the Company's business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.
Compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations may result in increased capital, operating and other costs, including remediation and containment expenses and monitoring obligations. The Company cannot predict how it would be affected if existing environmental laws and regulations were revised, or if new environmental laws and regulations seeking to protect the environment were adopted, but any such changes could increase the Company's financing requirements or otherwise adversely affect the Company's business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity. Revised or additional laws and regulations could also result in additional operating restrictions on the Company's facilities or increased compliance costs which may not be fully recoverable in our rates, thereby reducing the Company's net income. For example, any future changes in the interpretation of the Clean Air Act's new source review provisions could potentially increase the Company's operating and maintenance costs substantially. Similarly, in March 2005, the EPA adopted the Clear Air Act Mercury Rule, which is intended to reduce mercury emissions from coal-fired generation plants. The Company cannot be certain how this rule will affect it.
In addition, the Company may be designated as a responsible party for environmental clean-up at a site identified by a regulatory body. The Company cannot predict with certainty the amount and timing of all future expenditures related to environmental matters because of the difficulty of estimating clean-up and compliance costs, and the possibility that changes will
91
be made to the current environmental laws and regulations. There is also uncertainty in quantifying liabilities under environmental laws that impose joint and several liability on all potentially responsible parties. Failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations, even if caused by factors beyond the Company's control, may result in the assessment of civil or criminal penalties and fines against the Company. For example, in October 2003, the TCEQ requested information from PNM concerning any involvement that PNM had with SESCO, a former electrical equipment repair and sales company located in San Angelo, Texas. PNM was informed that the TCEQ and the EPA claim to have identified contamination of the soil and groundwater at the site. TCEQ is conducting a site investigation of a SESCO facility pursuant to the Texas Solid Waste Act, and the SESCO site has been referred to the Superfund Site Discovery and Assessment Program. The primary concern appears to be polychlorinated biphenyls in soil and groundwater on and adjacent to the site. The TCEQ is conducting the site investigation to determine what remediation activities are required at the SESCO site and to identify potentially responsible parties. In February 2005, PNM agreed to participate in the potentially responsible party committee. PNM will voluntarily participate with the others in the investigation and may participate in any required remediation at the SESCO facility. PNM is still investigating its role in the matter, and is unable to predict the outcome at this time.
The Company's business, results of operations and financial position may be adversely affected if the Company does not successfully compete for wholesale customers and generation plant acquisition opportunities. The Company's wholesale plants will be exposed to price risk to the extent they must compete for the sale of energy and capacity.
The electric utility industry has experienced a substantial increase in competition at the wholesale level, caused by changes in federal law and regulatory policy. As a result of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, competition in the wholesale electricity market has greatly increased due to a greater participation by traditional electricity suppliers, non-utility generators, independent power producers, wholesale power marketers and brokers, and due to the trading of energy futures contracts on various commodities exchanges. In 1996, the FERC issued new rules on transmission service to facilitate competition in the wholesale market on a nationwide basis. The rules give greater flexibility and more choices to wholesale power customers. Also, in July 2002, the FERC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (which has not yet been adopted) related to open access transmission service and standard electricity market design.
As a result of the changing regulatory environment and the relatively low barriers to entry (which include, in addition to open access transmission service, relatively low construction costs for new generating facilities), the Company expects competition to steadily increase. This increased competition could affect the Company's load forecasts, acquisition opportunities and wholesale energy sales and related revenues. Given that during 2004, the Company's sales in the wholesale electric market accounted for approximately 62% of our total MWh sales, the impact of these changes on the Company's financial results could be material. The effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial position could vary depending on the extent to which:
the Company is are able to acquire additional generation to compete in the wholesale market,
new opportunities are created for the Company to expand its wholesale load, and
92
current wholesale customers elect to purchase from other suppliers after existing contracts expire.
The Company's long-term contracts to supply power expire from 2006 through 2020. The Company's ability to renew these contracts at terms comparable to those currently in place is dependent upon prevailing market conditions at the time of negotiations. Currently, the Company has a long-term firm commitment contract with TNP of 114 MW that expires in 2006. The contract is priced above current market prices. If the TNP acquisition is completed, the Company expects to provide the power supply needs of TNP. However, if the TNP acquisition is not completed, the Company expects to lose the revenue from this above-market contract unless rising short-term and forward markets allow it to mitigate the revenue loss.
To the extent electric capacity generated by the Company's wholesale plants is not under contract to be sold or committed to serving its retail electric load, either now or in the future, the Company's business, results of operations and financial position will generally depend on the prices that can be obtained for energy and capacity in New Mexico and adjacent markets. Among the factors that would influence these prices, all of which are beyond the Company's control to a significant degree, are those described in the next risk factor.
The Company may not be able to mitigate fuel and wholesale electricity pricing risks, which could result in unanticipated liabilities or increased volatility in its earnings.
The Company's business and operations are subject to changes in purchased power prices and fuel costs that may cause increases in the amounts the Company must pay for power supplies on the wholesale market and the cost of producing power in its generation plants. As evidenced by the California energy crisis in 2000-2001, prices for electricity, fuel and natural gas may fluctuate substantially over relatively short periods of time and expose the Company to significant commodity price risks.
Among the factors that could affect market prices for electricity and fuel are:
prevailing market prices for coal, oil, natural gas and other fuels used in the Company's generation plants, including associated transportation costs, and supplies of such commodities,
changes in the regulatory framework for the commodities markets that the Company relies on for purchased power and fuel,
liquidity in the general wholesale electricity market,
the actions of external parties; such as the FERC or independent system operators, that may impose price limitations and other mechanisms to address some of the volatility in the western energy markets,
weather conditions impacting demand for electricity or availability of hydroelectric power or fuel supplies,
the rate of growth in electricity as a result of population changes, regional economic conditions and the implementation of conservation programs,
93
union and labor relations,
natural disasters, wars, embargoes and other catastrophic events, and
changes in federal and state energy and environmental laws and regulations.
The Company utilizes derivatives such as forward contracts, futures contracts, options and swaps to manage these risks. The Company attempts to manage its exposure from these activities through enforcement of established risk limits and risk management procedures. The Company cannot be certain that these strategies will be successful in managing its pricing risk, or that they will not result in net liabilities to the Company as a result of future volatility in these markets.
In addition, although the Company routinely enters into contracts to offset its positions (i.e. to hedge its exposure to the risks of demand, market effects of weather and changes in commodity prices), the Company does not always hedge the entire exposure of its operations from commodity price volatility. Furthermore, the Company's ability to hedge its exposure to commodity price volatility depends on liquid commodity markets. To the extent the commodity markets are illiquid, the Company may not be able to execute its risk management strategies, which could result in greater open positions than the Company would prefer at a given time. To the extent that open positions exist, fluctuating commodity prices can improve or diminish the Company's business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.
Impairments of the Company's tangible long-lived assets could adversely affect the Company's business, financial position, liquidity and results of operations.
The Company evaluates its tangible long-lived assets for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist pursuant to SFAS 144. These potential impairment triggers would include fluctuating market conditions as a result of industry deregulation; planned and scheduled customer purchase commitments; future market penetration; fluctuating market prices resulting from factors including changing fuel costs and other economic conditions; weather patterns; and other market trends. Accounting rules require that if the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows from a company's asset (excluding interest charges that will be recognized as expenses when incurred) is less than the carrying value of the asset, then asset impairment must be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of impairment recognized is the difference between the fair value of the asset and the carrying value of the asset. The Company determined that no triggering events occurred during the period for its generation assets.
The Company has three turbines, which are currently in storage, with a combined carrying value of approximately $79.7 million. The Company believes that it will be able to place two of the turbines in service and recover the costs of these two turbines in rates. The Company analyzed the remaining turbine for impairment and concluded no impairment existed based on the Company's plans for its use. The carrying amount of this turbine at March 31, 2005 was $16.6 million. The Company expects to begin construction utilizing this turbine over the next several years. If the Company were unable to realize these plans, the Company would be forced to recognize a loss with respect to the carrying value of the turbine depending on prevailing market conditions. The Company will continue to analyze the turbine for impairment in accordance with SFAS 144.
94
Actual results could differ from estimates used to prepare the Company's financial statements.
In preparing the financial statements in accordance with GAAP, management must often make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and during the reporting period. Some of those judgments can be subjective and complex, and actual results could differ from those estimates. For more information about these estimates and assumptions, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates".
Provisions of the Company's organizational documents, as well as several other statutory and regulatory factors, will limit another party's ability to acquire the Company and could deprive the Company's shareholders of the opportunity to gain a takeover premium for shares of the Company's common stock.
The Company's restated articles of incorporation and by-laws include a number of provisions that may have the effect of discouraging persons from acquiring large blocks of the Company's common stock or delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company. The material provisions that may have such an effect include:
authorization for the Company's Board to issue the Company's preferred stock in series and to fix rights and preferences of the series (including, among other things, whether, and to what extent, the shares of any series will have voting rights, subject to certain limitations, and the extent of the preferences of the shares of any series with respect to dividends and other matters),
provisions classifying the Company's Board into three classes, with the directors being elected for staggered terms,
advance notice procedures with respect to any proposal other than those adopted or recommended by the Company's Board, and
provisions specifying that only a majority of the Board, the chairman of the Board, the president or holders of not less than one-tenth of all of the Holding Company's shares entitled to vote may call a special meeting of stockholders.
Under the New Mexico Public Utility Act, approval of the NMPRC is required for certain transactions that may result in our change in control or exercise of control. Certain acquisitions by any person of our outstanding voting securities would also require approval of the SEC under PUHCA.
95
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
See "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk" in "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that it is able to collect the information it is required to disclose in the reports it files with the SEC, and to process, summarize and disclose this information within the time periods specified in the rules of the SEC. Based on an evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report conducted by the Company's management, with the participation of the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers believe that these controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the Company is able to collect, process, and disclose the information it is required to disclose in the reports it files with the SEC within the required time periods.
Changes in Internal Controls
There have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting for the Company's quarter ended March 31, 2005, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 7 - "Commitments and Contingencies", in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the following matters, incorporated in this item by reference.
Navajo Nation Environmental Issues
Citizen Suit Under the Clean Air Act
Excess Emissions Reports
Santa Fe Generating Station
Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam Litigation
Asbestos Cases
SESCO Matter
Legal Proceedings discussed under the caption "Western United States Wholesale Power Market"
Wholesale Power Marketing Antitrust Suit
Tax Refund Litigation
96
ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS
DIRECTOR AND OFFICER COMPENSATION
As reported in the Company's 2005 Proxy Statement, the existing Director Retainer Plan will expire on July 1, 2005. If approved by shareholders, the Director Retainer Plan will be replaced by the Amended and Restated Omnibus Performance Equity Plan ("PEP") which will permit non-employee directors to be eligible for awards under the PEP. Upon shareholder approval, director compensation will include the following stock options and restricted stock units issued under the PEP. The following terms were approved by the Board in its February 2005 meeting. A summary sheet containing the terms is filed as Exhibit 10.138 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. If the PEP is not approved by shareholders, the Directors would be not be able to receive the equity portion of the retainer as proposed for 2005 and, consequently, would need to consider an alternative retainer structure. The Directors have not yet considered an alternative retainer if the PEP is not approved by shareholders. Directors are also reimbursed for any Board-related expenses.
Annual Retainer : |
$35,000, 1,050 stock options* and 1,050 restricted stock rights* |
|
Annual Committee Chair Fee : |
$ 4,000 (in addition to meeting attendance fees) |
|
|
||
Attendance Fees : |
$ 0 per Board meeting $ 1,250 per Board Committee meeting |
*The options and restricted stock rights will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant. The exercise price of the stock option is equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Fair market value is determined by the closing price of the New York Stock Exchange on the date of the grant.
The Company's executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers, participate in a short-term "at risk" cash compensation plan, as reported in the Company's 2005 Proxy Statement. The 2004 Officer Incentive Plan was filed with the Company's 2003 Form 10-K. Performance targets are established for three levels of achievement: Threshold, Stretch and Optimal. The plan is designed to pay twenty percent (20%) of the award opportunity on performance targets tied to individual performance goals, company-wide customer satisfaction, cost control, and operations efficiency, and eighty percent (80%) of the award opportunity on the achievement of corporate earnings per share ("EPS") targets. In its February 2005 meeting, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the "Committee") approved the 2005 Officer Incentive Plan without material change to the provisions of the previously filed 2004 Officer Incentive Plan and set the EPS target for 2005. The 2005 Officer Incentive Plan is filed as Exhibit 10.30 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Committee also made changes in base salaries for the executive officers for 2005. The changes were consistent with the description of how base salaries are set in the Committee's report in the 2005 Proxy Statement.
97
The Company's internet address is http://www.pnmresources.com. (This is a new internet address that became effective April 26, 2005.) The contents of this website address are not a part of this Form 10-Q. The Company's filings with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, are accessible free of charge at http://www.pnmresources.com as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC, and, upon request, are available in print from the Company free of charge. Additionally, the Company's Corporate Governance Principles, code of ethics ( Do the Right Thing-Principles of Business Conduct ) and charters of the Company's Audit and Ethics Committee, Governance and Public Policy Committee, Human Resources and Compensation Committee and Finance Committee are available on the Company's website at http://www.pnmresources.com/ge/index and such information is available in print, without charge, to any shareholder who requests it. On the pnm.com website, a click on any portion of the "Investing" or "Governance" sections will automatically inform the user of the new website and provide a direct link to pnmresources.com.
98
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
3.2.1 |
Bylaws of PNM with all Amendments to and including May 31, 2002 (incorporated by reference from exhibit 3.1.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002). |
|
10.30** |
2005 Officer Incentive Plan. |
|
10.134 |
Stipulation dated February 28, 2005 in NMPRC Case No. 04-00315-UT regarding the application of PNM Resources and TNMP for approval of the TNP acquisition. |
|
10.135 |
Consent Decree entered into by PNM on March 9, 2005 relating to the citizen suit under the Clean Air Act and the excess emissions report matter for SJGS. |
|
10.136 |
Distribution, Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated February 24, 2005 among PNMR Development and Management Corporation, Luna Power, LLC, Tuscon Electric Power Company ("TEP") and Phelps Dodge Energy Services, LLC ("Phelps"). |
|
10.137 |
Engineering, Procurement and Construction Agreement dated February 24, 2005 dated February 24, 2005 among Fluor Enterprises, Inc., TEP and Phelps. |
|
10.138 |
Changes in Director Compensation. |
|
12.1 | Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. | |
12.2 | Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends. | |
15.1 |
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Awareness Letter for PNM Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries.. |
|
15.2 |
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Awareness Letter for Public Service Company of New Mexico. |
|
31.1 |
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
** designates a management contract or compensation plan or arrangement required to be identified pursuant to paragraph 3 of Item 15(a) of Form 10-K.
99
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND
|
|
(Registrants) |
|
|
|
Date: May 3, 2005 |
/s/ Thomas G. Sategna |
Thomas G. Sategna |
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller |
|
(Officer duly authorized to sign this report) |
100
Exhibit 10.30
PNM RESOURCES, INC.
2005 OFFICER INCENTIVE PLAN
INTRODUCTION
This document serves as a comprehensive single source of information about the PNM Resources, Inc. Officer Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). It describes the objectives of the Plan, its various elements, and how they function. If you have questions that are not addressed by this document, please direct them to the Compensation Department.
PLAN OBJECTIVES
The Plan is designed to motivate and reward participants for achieving and exceeding annual company, business unit and individual goals, and the company-wide earnings per share ("EPS") goal.
EFFECTIVE DATES
The Plan is effective from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005 (the "Plan Year"). Management reserves the right, however, to adjust, amend or suspend the Plan at its discretion during the Plan Year, with the approval of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of the Board of Directors (the "Board").
ADMINISTRATION
Plan Year Goals
Individual goal sets (e.g. combined company, business unit, and individual) will be established for each Officer. After considering the recommendations of management, the Committee will approve the company-wide EPS goals against which performance will be measured for the Plan Year.
Incentive Award Approvals and Payout Timing
Shortly after the end of the Plan Year, the Committee or the Board will, in its sole discretion, determine the final performance results which will be used to calculate awards, if any. Awards will be distributed by check to eligible participants following such approval during the first quarter following the end of the Plan Year.
ETHICS
The purpose of the Plan is to fairly reward performance achievement. Any employee who manipulates or attempts to manipulate the Plan for personal gain at the expense of customers, other employees or company objectives will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment.
ELIGIBILITY
All officers are eligible to participate in the Plan. For purposes of this Plan, officer means any employee of the company with the title of Chief Executive Officer, President, Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President or Vice President.
1
Pro Rata Awards for Partial Service Periods
Pro rata awards for the number of months actively employed at each eligibility level during the Plan Year will be paid to the following participants at the time awards are paid to all participants: (Note: Any month in which a participant is actively on the payroll for at least one day will count as a full month.)
- Participants who are newly hired during the Plan Year.
- Participants who are promoted, transferred or demoted during the Plan Year.
- Participants who are on leave of absence for any full months during the Plan Year.
- Participants who are impacted or leave the company due to retirement or disability during the Plan Year. (Note: For purposes of the Plan, "retirement" means termination of employment with the company and all affiliates after the employee has attained: (1) age forty-five and twenty years of service; (2) age fifty-five and ten years of service; (3) the age at which the early distribution penalty of Section 72(t) of the Internal Revenue Code no longer applies and five years of service; or (4) any age and thirty years of service.)
- Participants who die during the Plan Year, in which case the award will be paid to the spouse of a married participant or the legal representative of an unmarried participant.
Forfeiture of Awards
Any participant who terminates employment on or before awards are distributed for the Plan Year for any reason other than death, impaction or retirement (e.g., voluntary separation, termination for performance or misconduct - even if the terminated participant elects to take retirement) will not be eligible for payment of an award.
Provisions for a Change in Control
Please refer to the PNM Resources, Inc. Officer Retention Plan for additional information.
Eligible Base for Incentive Purposes
For the purpose of incentive calculations, the applicable salary grade midpoint is the participant's salary grade midpoint effective December 31 of the Plan Year unless the participant has been demoted during the Plan Year. In this event, the participant's salary grade midpoint may be prorated based on the period of time worked at each level.
Awards may be earned for performance that provides additional value to our shareholders. The incremental performance needed to fund awards is taken into consideration in establishing performance thresholds and goals under the Plan.
Performance Thresholds
I n order to be eligible for incentive awards, the following performance threshold must be met for 2005 (Individual Award):
- Overall combined company, business unit, and individual goal performance that at least achieves the threshold performance level. If this performance threshold is not met, no award will be paid for the Plan Year.
2
In order to be eligible for the award enhancement, the following performance threshold must be met for 2005:
- Company-wide EPS of $1.40 or more. If this performance threshold is not met, no award enhancement will be applied.
Combined Company, Business Unit, and Individual Performance Award Opportunity
For the 2005 Plan Year, the combined company, business unit, and individual performance (Individual Award) opportunities are as follows:
Award Eligibility Level |
Individual Goal Set |
||
Threshold* |
Stretch* |
Optimal* |
|
Vice-President |
4.0% |
7.0% |
10.0% |
Senior Vice-President |
4.8% |
8.4% |
12.0% |
Executive Vice-President |
5.6% |
9.8% |
14.0% |
Chairman, President, and CEO |
11.2% |
19.6% |
28.0% |
* Award calculated as a percentage of salary grade midpoint
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Award Enhancement
For the 2005 Plan Year, the EPS award enhancement opportunities are as follows:
EPS Threshold Target = $1.40 |
EPS = $1.41 to $1.59 |
EPS Optimal Target = $1.60 |
Individual Award is enhanced 2x |
Workgroup Award is enhanced 2x to 5x using straight-line interpolation |
Individual Award is enhanced a maximum of 5x |
For this Plan, EPS is defined as net income related to running the business (excluding certain extraordinary items or events that result in windfalls or penalties which are not in keeping with the spirit of the Plan) divided by the number of shares of PNM Resources, Inc. common stock outstanding.
Note: See Appendix for award opportunity matrix.
Award Calculation
Combined company, business unit, and individual goal performance that meets or exceeds the threshold target level will be eligible for an award. The amount of each participant's award is determined by the participant's eligibility level and the level of combined company, business unit, and individual goal performance in the "Combined Company, Business Unit, and Individual Performance Award Opportunity" table above.
Company EPS performance that meets or exceeds the threshold target will serve as an enhancement to the award paid for workgroup performance. As identified in the "EPS Award Enhancement" table above, the award enhancement will be a minimum of 2x at the EPS threshold target, a maximum of 5x at the EPS optimal target, and interpolated between the EPS threshold and optimal targets.
The resulting percent is multiplied by the participant's eligible salary grade midpoint to determine the amount of the participant's award.
For Example: Assume that overall workgroup results are at the optimal performance level and company-wide EPS performance is $1.50 (halfway between EPS threshold and optimal targets). A participant who is eligible for an award at the Vice-President eligibility level would receive an award of 35% of salary grade midpoint for the Plan Year. That is, workgroup optimal performance resulting in an award of 10%, which is
3
then enhanced 3.5x (halfway between threshold and optimal multipliers) for EPS performance. Assuming the participant's salary grade midpoint is $160,000 the award would be $56,000 ($160,000 x 35.0%).
Appendix
2005 Officer Incentive
Plan
Award Matrix
4
EXHIBIT 10.134
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION |
) |
OF PNM RESOURCES INC. AND TEXAS- |
) |
NEW MEXICO POWER CO. FOR APPROVAL |
) |
OF PNM RESOURCES' ACQUISITION OF |
) |
TNP ENTERPRISES INC.; FOR APPROVAL |
) CASE NO. 04-00315-UT |
OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER'S |
) |
PROPOSED REGULATORY PLAN; AND |
) |
FOR ALL OTHER APPROVALS AND |
) |
AUTHORIZATIONS REQUIRED TO |
) |
EFFECTUATE AND IMPLEMENT THE |
) |
ACQUISITION. |
) |
|
) |
PNM RESOURCES INC. AND TEXAS-NEW |
) |
MEXICO POWER CO. |
) |
|
) |
Applicants |
) |
|
) |
|
) |
STIPULATION
PNM Resources, Inc. ("PNM Resources"); Texas-New Mexico Power Company ("TNMP"); the Staff of the Utility Division ("Staff") of the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission ("NMPRC" or "Commission"); the New Mexico Industrial Energy Consumers ("NMIEC"); and Patricia Madrid, the Attorney General of the State of New Mexico (the "AG"), (collectively the "Signatories"), through their undersigned authorized representatives, agree and stipulate as follows:
INTRODUCTION
1. On September 9, 2004, the Applicants, PNM Resources and TNMP, filed with the NMPRC an Application Requesting Approvals and Authorizations for (1) the acquisition by PNM Resources of TNP Enterprises, Inc. ("TNP Enterprises"), the holding company of TNMP; (2) a plan for sharing certain claimed net synergy savings with customers by means of billing credits; and (3) all the approvals, authorizations and actions that may be required under the New Mexico Public Utility Act to consummate and implement the acquisition and plan.
2. If this transaction is approved, PNM Resources would acquire all the outstanding common stock of TNP Enterprises in exchange for PNM Resources stock and cash. TNMP will remain a wholly-owned subsidiary of TNP Enterprises and TNP Enterprises would become a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNM Resources. Public Service Company of New Mexico ("PNM") will remain as a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNM Resources.
3. The Signatories have arrived at this Stipulation which they believe is fair, just and reasonable and not inconsistent with the public interest. In addition to the Signatories, El Paso Electric Company, Phelps Dodge Corporation, Southwestern Public Service Company, the City of Albuquerque, MSR Public Power Agency, Otero County Electric Cooperative, the United States Executive Agencies, the Regents of the University of New Mexico, and Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. intervened in the proceeding and participated, from time to time, in the discussions that led to this Stipulation.
STIPULATION
4. The Signatories stipulate that PNM Resources' and TNMP's Application should be approved and PNM Resources should be authorized to acquire the common stock of TNP Enterprises, allocate a portion of the net synergy savings to PNM and TNMP customers and implement a rate reduction for TNMP's New Mexico retail electric customers as set forth herein,
2
and receive all other approvals, authorizations and actions as may be required under the New Mexico Public Utility Act to consummate and implement the transaction contemplated in the Application on the following terms and conditions:
Net Synergy Savings
5. The consolidation of services as a result of the transaction is expected to result in reduced costs for the affiliated companies through, among other things, reductions in corporate and headquarters' staffing, reduced corporate and administrative programs, and purchasing savings through economies of scale. Savings will be gained through elimination of duplicate and overlapping activities that might otherwise occur with each affiliate company providing its own support services. These savings, net of costs to achieve them, are referred to as "net synergy savings".
Allocation of Net Synergy Savings
6. Net synergy savings of $24.9 million, as described in the Application, will be allocated among the affiliated New Mexico and Texas companies (PNM Resources, PNM, Avistar, and the TNPE Group) as described below.
7. None of the net synergy savings ($24.9 million) will be allocated to TNP Enterprises. The $649,282 of net synergy savings allocated to TNP Enterprises in the Company's original filing shall be assigned to TNMP's New Mexico utility ("TNMP-NM"). Total net synergy savings allocated to TNMP-NM will therefore be adjusted up to $1,916,430. The $1,916,430 is included as part of the overall rate reduction to TNMP's New Mexico customers as set forth in paragraph 10, below.
8. PNM electric retail customers will receive a total of $6,990,127 as their share of the net synergy savings. Such amount shall be allocated as follows:
3
(a) Effective with closing, net synergy savings of $2,330,043 will be used to create a regulatory liability for the benefit of customers, to be recognized in PNM's next general rate case (the "2007 Electric Retail Rate Case"). This amount shall accrue interest at 8.64% from the date of closing until reflected in new rates.
(b) Beginning January 1, 2008, PNM will implement a rate rider to credit the balance of the net synergy savings allocated to PNM retail electric customers. The credit rate rider will remain in effect until PNM electric retail customers receive rate credits totaling $4,660,084 (expected to be by June 30, 2010). PNM will file a reconciliation report with the commission, with electronic copies to all intervenors in this Case, within 60 days of completing the refund.
(c) In the 2007 Electric Retail Rate Case, PNM will calculate cumulative and test year net synergy savings. In that Case, PNM will explain any differences between the net synergy savings calculated, and the net synergy savings anticipated in this Case. If the cumulative amount of net synergy savings is less than $49.8 million, PNM will make an adjustment to remove the net cost or benefit included in the cost of service study (excluding the $2,330,043 regulatory liability and accrued interest described in paragraph 8(a) above). In the 2007 Electric Retail Rate Case, if the amount of cumulative net synergy savings is greater than $49.8 million, PNM will remove the net cost or benefit included in the cost of service study (excluding the $2,330,043 regulatory liability and accrued interest described in paragraph 8(a) above) and allocate any net synergy savings above the $49.8 million to the affiliated New Mexico
4
companies using the same methodology described in the Direct Testimony of Thomas G. Sategna (except that none of the net synergy savings will be allocated to TNP Enterprises). Any amounts allocated to PNM's electric retail customers through the above-described allocation process will be reflected as a reduction in PNM's cost of service in the 2007 Electric Retail Rate Case. Any other parties to that rate case may challenge and contest PNM's calculation of net savings.
(d) In any subsequent rate case proceeding, no tracking or adjustments to the test period cost of service will be proposed by PNM related to net synergy savings. Parties may, however, argue to include or exclude any costs to achieve the net synergy savings, and parties may also argue whether to impute savings.
9. PNM gas customers will receive their share of net synergy savings through a credit rate rider over five years as described in the Direct Testimony of Thomas G. Sategna. The total amount of net synergy savings to be credited back to PNM gas customers through the rate rider will be $4,299,761. PNM will file a reconciliation report within 60 days of completing the refund, with electronic copies to all intervenors in this Case.
10. TNMP-NM's rates will be reduced from current levels for all customers, except Phelps Dodge, effective for bills rendered beginning with the first normal billing cycle of January 2006 as follows: (1) by 1.851 cents per kWh effective on January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2007; (2) effective January 1, 2008, rates shall be reduced by an additional 0.1 cents per kWh, for a total reduction of 1.951 cents per kWh through December 31, 2008; and (3) effective January 1, 2009, rates shall be reduced by an additional 0.1 cents per kWh, for a total reduction of 2.051 cents per kWh through December 31, 2010. As part of the rate reduction, the current TNMP fuel and purchased power adjustment clause will be eliminated once amounts in the balancing account (plus or minus) as of December 31, 2005 are collected or returned to customers, but in no event will the fuel clause remain in effect after March 31, 2006.
5
11. The Signatories will not seek or support any change in TNMP's cost of service rates, other than the reduction described in paragraph 10, that would go into effect prior to January 1, 2011. The Signatories may support combining TNMP-NM and PNM cost of service rates, in a manner that has no adverse rate impact on PNM retail electric customers, for cost of service rates to go into effect after December 31, 2010. However, the Signatories will not support a combined cost of service to be effective after December 31, 2010 and prior to July 1, 2015 that would require a shift in annual revenue requirements from TNMP's New Mexico retail customers to retail electric customers in PNM's current service area greater than $1.5 million per year. Shifting cost recovery to later years to meet the $1.5 million threshold will not be permitted.
12. The resource plan to be filed with the Commission on March 31, 2005, will be re-filed, consistent with the Commission's order in this proceeding, 45 days after Commission approval of this Stipulation. Such re-filed plan shall include both PNM and TNMP-NM as stand-alone utilities, and as an integrated system.
Other Rate Issues
13. PNM and TNMP agree that they will not seek to recover through rates any amounts for goodwill or intangible assets resulting from the acquisition. If an amount of goodwill or intangible assets is pushed down to TNMP as an acquisition adjustment under the FERC chart of accounts, PNM and TNMP agree not to seek recovery of such amounts.
6
14. PNM agrees not to include certain transaction costs in any rate proceeding. The transaction costs not to be recovered in rates include the following: (1) TNPE recapitalization costs, i.e., PIK preferred call premium, call premium on 10.25% debt refinancing, and underwriting fees (legal, banking and others) incurred in connection with the recapitalization activities; (2) change of control/severance cost in excess of $5.4 million; (3) bank advisory fees incurred in connection with the acquisition; and (4) legal, external accounting and rating agency fees related to the negotiation and execution of the Stock Purchase Agreement.
15. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 11, the parties agree that the integration of TNMP-NM and PNM utility operations should have no adverse impact on PNM rates and service. Such impacts will be avoided through separate electric utility rates for PNM and TNMP-NM. A fuel clause will not be implemented for PNM electric customers as a result of this transaction. Effective January 1, 2007, PNM shall integrate the TNMP-NM assets into PNM, but shall continue to have separate rates until otherwise ordered by the NMPRC. The integration and resulting transfer of assets from TNMP-NM to PNM, as set forth herein, should be approved by the Commission as part of the transaction.
General Conditions
16. PNM agrees that it shall not seek to recover in New Mexico retail rates to be effective prior to December 31, 2010, more than the New Mexico jurisdictional share of $250,000 per year for the cost of a market monitor.
17. Subject to any change in statute or the issuance of a non-appealable decision from a federal appeals court, the U.S. Supreme Court or the New Mexico Supreme Court that would prevent compliance with the following commitment, PNM and TNMP-NM commit to obtain NMPRC approval for any proposed transfer of ownership or operational authority over their
7
New Mexico jurisdictional transmission systems prior to such transfer. Any such application shall include a cost/benefit analysis. If PNM or TNMP is ordered to transfer ownership or operational authority of transmission facilities subject to the Commission's jurisdiction by an entity other than the NMPRC, and the order is not contingent on NMPRC approval, PNM or TNMP (as the case may be) agrees to seek judicial review and in good faith exhaust all opportunities to appeal and overturn such order. Such judicial review or appeal` may be withdrawn if the NMPRC grants approval for such transfer. This provision shall not be interpreted to require additional approval (other than what is contained in the NMPRC's approval of this Stipulation) for PNM to acquire TNMP's New Mexico operations and assets.
18. This Stipulation shall not become effective until the FERC issues an order approving this transaction without conditions that mandate, coerce or entice PNM or TNMP to join an RTO or similar organization. PNM Resources shall serve a copy of the FERC order with the Commission and all of the Parties within three days of receipt of that order. If any signatory files a notice with the Commission that it objects to any such conditions contained in the FERC order, the Signatories agree to withdraw the Stipulation from consideration by the Commission. This Stipulation shall become effective if no Signatory files a notice of objection within 13 days of the service of the FERC order by PNM Resources.
19. The Commission has continuing jurisdiction to investigate whether future actions of the SEC have an adverse and material effect on PNM's or TNMP's New Mexico service and rates, and to amend its order in this Case to counter any material adverse effects of an SEC order conditioning this acquisition.
20. PNM agrees that its requested cost of equity in its next general rate case will be based on the higher of its actual credit rating by Standard & Poor's or BBB, unless PNM can demonstrate that the rating lower than BBB is caused by events unrelated to this acquisition or its effects. PNM shall have the burden of establishing that the order meets the standard of this paragraph.
8
21. PNM Resources and its affiliates, including TNPE, will be subject to the holding company and other provisions attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Such provisions include dividends, cost allocations, loan agreements, asset transfers, affiliate transactions, separateness covenants, federal preemption, and arise from the Commission's final order in Case No. 3137, as well as the other orders and requirements listed in Exhibit A. The compilation in Exhibit A is not intended to eliminate any requirements from prior Commission orders by omission. If there are any inconsistencies between Exhibit A and this Stipulation, the provisions of this Stipulation shall govern. PNM/TNMP agree to hold New Mexico jurisdictional customers harmless from any and all negative impacts of activities engaged in by affiliates. Nothing in the approval of this acquisition shall preclude the NMPRC from taking steps that it deems necessary to protect ratepayers and to assure that the utilities' ability to provide reasonable and proper service at fair, just and reasonable rates will not be adversely and materially affected.
22. No New Mexico jurisdictional asset valued at greater than $50,000, will be transferred out of the utilities (either PNM or TNMP) to any affiliate without prior Commission approval. Transfers of any jurisdictional assets after $100,000 of assets have been transferred in a calendar year will also require Commission approval. This approval shall not be interpreted to require additional approval (other than that contained in the NMPRC's approval of this Stipulation) for PNM to integrate TNMP-NM assets into PNM effective January 1, 2007 as provided in paragraph 15 above.
9
23. Reports on employee transfers (by job title) between PNM or TNMP's New Mexico operations and their affiliates shall be filed with the NMPRC, with electronic copies to all intervenors in this Case, by April 1 and November 1 of each year.
24. A cost allocation manual ("CAM") integrating the TNPE acquisition shall be filed within six months of the closing of the acquisition, with electronic copies to all intervenors in this Case. Any CAM will be subject to review and challenge in any rate proceeding.
Other Provisions
25. PNM and TNMP agree to maintain TNMP's current transmission and distribution ("T&D") construction centers, local offices and the current number of TNMP employees in New Mexico performing T&D field services for a period of two years after closing of this transaction. Prior to that time, T&D field service employee reductions can be accomplished only through attrition, voluntary severance or early retirement.
26. The PNM and TNMP annual reports to the NMPRC will contain information on reliability indices including at least SAIDI and SAIFI.
27. Attached to this Stipulation are the following exhibits:
Exhibit A ‑ Restatement of Case 3137 Holding Company, Merchant Plant and other conditions Pursuant to Paragraph 21 of this Stipulation.
Exhibit B ‑ Notification of Information Updating Public Service Company of New Mexico's Revised General Diversification Plan to reflect the new affiliations and corporate structure after completion of the acquisition.
Exhibit C ‑ Notification of Information Updating Texas‑New Mexico Power Company Amended General Diversification Plan reflecting changes in the information included in TNMP's GDP that will result from the closing of the proposed acquisition.
10
Staff has reviewed Exhibits B and C and has concluded that no additional information is required. Applicants' position is that the acquisition does not involve a Class II transaction which would require approval of new or amended GDPs. However, all Signatories agree that the Commission's approval of this transaction pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 62‑6‑12 should include any and all approvals required by the Public Utility Act or Commission regulations for the transaction to close, whether or not expressly granted.
28. The Commission must approve any changes, extensions or other modifications to the existing PNM/TNMP power contract prior to their taking effect.
29. PNM and TNMP (while it has New Mexico jurisdictional operations) shall obtain prior Commission approval for sales of capacity or energy to non-utility subsidiaries of any of the holding companies, except for emergency and economy energy sales, and except for sales from Merchant Plant or Excluded Plant.
30. PNMR, PNM, TNPE and TNMP commit that the Commission shall have access to those books and records of any PNMR affiliates involved in transactions downstream of a Class I or Class II transaction which are reasonably required and pertinent to an examination of the reasonableness of the Class I or Class II transaction.
General Provisions
31. Except as specifically stated in the language of this Stipulation, the provisions of this Stipulation have no precedential effect and the Parties do not waive rights they may have in any other pending or future proceeding and will not be deemed to have approved, accepted, agreed to or consented to the application of any concept, principle, theory or method in any future proceeding.
11
32. A Final Order issued by the Commission approving this Stipulation will not constitute a bar to further litigation of issues raised in pleadings and testimony or any issues which could have been raised or any other matters which have not been specifically addressed by this Stipulation. In accordance with 17 NMAC 1.2.23.4, by approving this Stipulation, the Commission is neither granting any approval nor creating any precedent regarding any principle or issue in this or any other proceeding.
33. This Stipulation reflects a negotiated settlement, and if the Stipulation is not executed or is not adopted in its entirety by the Commission, without additions or deletions, the Stipulation will be void and any statement made or positions taken by the Parties during the course of these negotiations will not be admissible before any regulatory agency or court. The Stipulation contains the full intent and understanding of the entire agreement of the Parties and no implication should be drawn on any matter not addressed in the Stipulation. There are not and have not been, any representations, warranties or agreements other than those specifically set forth above.
34. This Stipulation may be executed in a number of counterparts including by telefax, each of which will be deemed to be an original and all of which will constitute one of the same agreement.
Respectfully submitted this 28 th day of February, 2005.
Patrick Ortiz
Charles Garcia
Madonna Bixby
Alvarado Square, MS 2822
Albuquerque, NM 87158-2822
(505) 241-2896
(505) 241-2368 (fax
portiz@pnm.com
12
WHITE, KOCH, KELLY & McCARTHY, P.A.
By:
/s/ Benjamin
Phillips
BENJAMIN PHILLIPS
REBECCA DEMPSEY
433 Paseo de Peralta
Santa Fe, NM 87501
(505) 982-4374
(505) 984-8631 (fax)
phillips@wkkm.com
rdempsey@wkkm.com
Attorneys for PNM Resources
Michael D. Blanchard
Vice President & General
Counsel
Gary W. Boyle
Senior Litigation Attorney
Texas-New Mexico Power Company
4100 International Plaza
Forth Worth, TX 76109
(817) 731-0099
(817) 737-1333 (fax)
mblanchard@tnpe.com
gboyle@tnpe.com
COMEAU, MALDEGEN, TEMPLEMAN &
INDALL, LLP
By:
/s/ William P.
Templeman
WILLIAM P. TEMPLEMAN
JOSEPH E. MANGES
141 E. Palace Ave.
Post Office Box 669
Santa Fe, NM 87504-0669
(505) 982-4611
(505) 988-2987 (fax)
wtempleman@cmtisantafe.com
jmanges@cmtisantafe.com
13
UTILITY STAFF OF THE NEW MEXICO
PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
By:
/s/ Dahl Harris
DAHL HARRIS
Staff Counsel
223 East Palace
Santa Fe, NM 87502-2013
Phone: (505) 827-7479
Fax: (505) 927-6916
NEW MEXICO INDUSTRIAL ENERGY
CONSUMERS.
By:
/s/ Steven S.
Michel
STEVEN S. MICHEL
368 Hillside Avenue
Santa Fe,
NM 87501
Phone: (505) 989-8731
Fax: (505) 989-1450
PATRICIA
MADRID
NEW
MEXICO ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:
/s/ Jeff Taylor
Jeff Taylor
Assistant Attorney General
Post Office Drawer 1508
Santa Fe, NM 87504-1508
Phone: (505) 827-6000
Fax: (505) 827-5826
14
EXHIBIT 10.135
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
THE GRAND CANYON TRUST and | ) |
SIERRA CLUB, | ) |
) | |
Plaintiffs, | ) |
) | |
THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, | ) |
) | |
Plaintiff-Intervenor, | ) |
) | |
v. | ) CV 02-552 BB/ACT (ACE) |
) | |
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF | ) |
NEW MEXICO, | ) |
) | |
Defendant. | ) |
CONSENT DECREE
Date lodged in Court March 10, 2005
Date entered by Court. ____________
I. BACKGROUND
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2002, Grand Canyon Trust and Sierra Club ("Plaintiffs") filed a citizen suit against Public Service Company of New Mexico ("PNM") in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico in the above cause alleging certain violations of the Clean Air Act ("CAA") at PNM's San Juan Generating Station ("San Juan") near Farmington, New Mexico; and
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' complaint alleged that PNM had violated, and was continuing to violate, the twenty (20) percent opacity emission limit at San Juan Units 1, 3 and 4, and that PNM was operating San Juan Units 3 and 4 without a prevention of significant deterioration ("PSD") permit in violation of the CAA; and
WHEREAS, after discovery, Plaintiffs and PNM filed at least four cross motions for summary judgment on both Plaintiffs' claims for relief and PNM's defenses; and
WHEREAS, on May 1, 2003, the Court granted Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on standing; and
WHEREAS, on August 20, 2003, the Court granted PNM's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' PSD claim; and
WHEREAS, the Court held a bench trial from November 17-19, 2003, on PNM's general defenses to Plaintiffs' opacity claim; and
WHEREAS, on February 2, 2004, the Court dismissed after trial PNM's general defenses to Plaintiffs' opacity claim; and
WHEREAS, on April 29, 2004, Plaintiffs served a second notice of intent to sue PNM regarding additional CAA violations at San Juan; and
WHEREAS, on May 26, 2004, PNM agreed to the entry of an Order that found 42,008
-2-
opacity limit violations at San Juan that would be addressed in the remedy phase of the case; and
WHEREAS, on September 12, 2003, the State of New Mexico, through the New Mexico Environment Department ("Department"), issued a draft administrative compliance order to PNM alleging that San Juan had violated on numerous occasions the limits for nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and opacity in its New Source Review and Title V permits; and
WHEREAS, on May 14, 2004, the Department issued a revised draft administrative compliance order to PNM alleging that San Juan had violated on numerous occasions the limits for nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and opacity in its New Source Review and Title V permits, the deviation reporting requirements in its Title V permit, and its obligation to implement good air pollution control practices; and
WHEREAS, contemporaneously with the lodging of this Consent Decree, the Department has moved to intervene in Plaintiffs' action as a party-plaintiff and has filed a complaint pursuant to Section 304(a) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(a), alleging the same violations contained in the draft administrative compliance orders issued on September 12, 2003 and May 14, 2004; and
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, the Department, and PNM have met on numerous occasions in an effort to resolve all of the issues and claims that are the subject of the complaints, draft compliance orders and second notice of intent to sue; and
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, the Department, and PNM agree that the settlement of these disputes without further litigation and through this Consent Decree is in the public interest, and is a fair, reasonable, and appropriate means of resolving the claims in the complaints, draft compliance orders and second notice of intent to sue because it requires the installation and
-3-
operation of pollution control equipment for particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and mercury at the four (4) San Juan units, at an estimated expenditure of more than $200 million. This relief is expected to correct all of the CAA violations alleged in the complaints, draft compliance orders and second notice of intent to sue, represents remedial relief sufficient to offset Plaintiffs' and the Department's claims for civil penalties, and reflects PNM's commitment to reduce substantially the emission of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter and mercury from San Juan; and
WHEREAS, PNM is the operator and a co-owner of each unit at San Juan; and
WHEREAS, except as otherwise stipulated to, PNM denies the allegations and does not admit liability for any claims or assertions in the complaints, draft compliance orders and second notice of intent to sue; and
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, the Department and PNM consent to the entry of this Consent Decree without further trial or appeal;
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby AGREED, ORDERED AND DECREED as follows:
II. DEFINITIONS
1. Unless otherwise
expressly provided herein, the terms used in this Consent
Decree that are defined in the CAA, or regulations implementing the CAA, shall
have the
meanings set forth in the CAA
and its implementing regulations.
2.
Whenever
the terms set forth below are used in this Consent Decree, the
following definitions shall apply:
"Act" or "CAA" means the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 7401 et seq.
"Average emission rate" means the total amount of a pollutant emitted from an emission unit during a given time period, expressed in pounds per million Btu ("Ib./MMBtu"), derived for
-4-
participate matter in accordance with Method 5, 40 C.F.R. Part 60, and for SO 2 and NO X in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Part 75. An "hourly average" emission rate means the average emission rate of pollutants discharged from the stack during a sixty (60) minute period, beginning on the hour. A "daily average" emission rate means the numerical average of the hourly average emission rates in an operating day, a "seven day average" emission rate means the numerical average of the hourly average emission rates for the operating days that occur within a period of seven (7) consecutive calendar days, and a "30 day average" emission rate means the numerical average of the hourly average emission rates for the operating days that occur within a period of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days. Unless explicitly specified elsewhere in this Decree, all average emission rates and average emission reduction efficiencies shall include all periods of startup, shutdown, malfunction, and emergency. All averages shall exclude inappropriate data (e.g., malfunction of the monitoring system) as specified elsewhere in this Decree and in the applicable EPA testing regulations at 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Appendix A, and Part 75.
"Block average" means an average emission rate for the operating days occurring over a specified period of consecutive calendar days. A new "block average" is generated for every specified period.
"Business day" means any day of the week except Saturday, Sunday and a federal or New Mexico holiday.
"Calendar day" means any twenty four (24) hour period between 12:00 midnight and the following midnight, Mountain Standard Time.
"CEMS" means continuous emissions monitoring system, which consists of the total equipment used to sample, analyze, and record on a continuous basis emissions-related
-5-
parameters other than Opacity.
"COMS" means continuous opacity monitoring system, which consists of the total equipment used to sample, analyze, and record Opacity on a continuous basis.
"Consent Decree" or "Decree" means this Consent Decree.
"Court" means the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.
"Day" means a calendar day. In computing any period of time under this Decree, except in computing compliance with emission limitations, where the last day would fall on a Saturday, Sunday or federal or New Mexico holiday, the period shall run until the close of the next business day.
"Department" means the New Mexico Environment Department, and any successor departments or agencies.
"Emergency means any situation arising from sudden and reasonably unforeseeable events beyond the control of PNM, including acts of God, which situation requires immediate corrective action to restore normal operation of San Juan. An emergency shall not include noncompliance to the extent caused by improperly designed equipment, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation.
"EPA" means the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and any successor departments or agencies.
"Excess opacity reading" means each six (6) minute period of time during which the opacity of emissions from a stack at a San Juan unit exceeds twenty (20) percent.
"Malfunction" means any sudden, infrequent and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or of a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions.
-6-
"NSR Permit" means PNM's NSR Permit 63-M2, issued January 22, 1997.
"NO X " means total oxides of nitrogen, except nitrous oxide, which are expressed as nitrogen dioxide using EPA Reference Method 7.
"Opacity" means the degree to which emissions reduce the transmission of light and obscure the view of an object in the background.
"Operating day means a calendar day in which fuel is combusted in a unit for at least three (3) hours. If fuel is combusted for more than three (3) hours during a calendar day, the calculation of that day's emissions for the unit shall be based upon the average emission rate of pollution during hours in which fuel was combusted in the unit, and shall not include any time in which fuel was not combusted.
"Operating Permit" means PNM's Operating Permit P062, which became effective on August 7, 1998.
"Parties" means collectively the Plaintiffs, the Department and PNM.
"Party" means Plaintiffs, the Department or PNM, individually.
"PM" means any airborne, finely divided solid or liquid material, other than uncombined water, with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 100 micrometers, and which is expressed as PM using EPA Reference Method 5.
"Plaintiffs" means collectively The Grand Canyon Trust and Sierra Club.
"PNM" means Public Service Company of New Mexico, a publicly owned corporation doing business in the State of New Mexico.
"Quarter" means a calendar quarter consisting of three (3) full months, beginning on the first day of either January, April, July, or October.
-7-
"Rolling average emission rate" means an average emission rate or average SO 2 percentage reduction that is generated each calendar day based on the average emission rate or average SO 2 percentage reduction for the operating days within a multiple-day period. A new average emission rate or average SO 2 percentage reduction is generated each calendar day.
"San Juan" means the San Juan Generating Station, comprised of four (4) fossil fuel-fired steam generating units (as that term is defined at 40 C.F.R. § 60.41 (a)) and associated equipment, located west of Farmington, New Mexico.
"Shutdown" means the cessation of operation of a fossil fuel-fired steam generating unit at San Juan for any purpose or reason.
"SO 2 " means sulfur dioxide.
"SO 2 percentage reduction" means the amount of SO 2 reduced by SO 2 removal equipment determined by (1) measuring the concentration of SO 2 in the flue gas upstream of the scrubber inlet (expressed as A), and (2) the contemporaneous concentration of SO 2 measured downstream of the scrubber outlet and any scrubber by-pass return (expressed as B), and performing the following calculation: 100 - 100(B ÷ A). An "hourly average" SO 2 percentage reduction means the numerical average of SO 2 percentage reduction values recorded in a sixty (60) minute period during which pollutants are discharged from the stack, beginning on the hour. A "daily average" SO 2 percentage reduction means the numerical average of the hourly average SO 2 percentage reduction values in an operating day. "Annual average" SO 2 percentage reduction means the numerical average of the hourly average SO 2 percentage reduction values for a period of 365 consecutive calendar days. All averages shall exclude inappropriate data (e.g., malfunction of the monitoring system) as specified elsewhere in this Decree and in the applicable EPA testing regulations at 40 C.F.R Part 60, Appendix A, and Part 75.
-8-
"Startup" means the setting in operation of a fossil fuel-fired steam generating unit at San Juan for any purpose or reason.
"State" means the State of New Mexico, including all of its departments, agencies, and instrumentalities.
"Unit 1", "Unit 2", "Unit 3", and "Unit 4" mean each of the four (4) fossil fuel-fired steam generating units and associated equipment at San Juan.
III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3.
This
Court has jurisdiction over the Parties to and the subject matter of this
action
under
Section 304 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604, the citizen suit provision, and under
28 U.S.C.
§§
1331,1345, and 1355.
4.
Venue
is proper in this Judicial District under Sections 304(c) and 113(b) of the
Act, 42
U.S.C. §§ 7604(c) and 7413(b), and under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1395.
IV. APPLICABILITY
5.
This
Decree shall apply to and be binding upon Plaintiffs, the Department, and
PNM, and
their officers, agents, successors, and assigns. PNM shall provide a copy of
this
Decree
to each contractor, subcontractor, laboratory, and any other entity retained to
conduct,
monitor
or otherwise perform any of the work required by or necessary to comply with
this
Decree.
6.
In
any action to enforce this Decree, PNM shall not assert as a defense the
failure
of its
officers, directors, employees, servants, agents, or contractors to take
actions necessary to
comply
with this Decree, unless PNM establishes that such failure resulted from
a.
force mqjeure
event
as defined in this Decree.
-9-
V. EMISSION CONTROLS AND LIMITATIONS
7.
PNM
shall at all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction,
maintain and operate Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 in a manner consistent with good air
pollution control
practices for minimizing emissions.
8.
Prior
to installing the pollution control equipment described below, in addition to
any
other applicable requirement, the emissions of PM, SO
2
and NO
X
and opacity from San Juan
shall be subject to Section
XI (Stipulated Penalties).
9.
PNM
shall install the following pollution control equipment, and make any other
capital and operational
modifications necessary to achieve the following emission limitations
and mercury operational requirements at San
Juan by the deadlines set forth in Section VIII
(Emission Limitation Compliance Deadlines):
(a) PM and Opacity
(i) PNM shall operate baghouses and demister technology on San Juan Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 to meet the following emission limitations.
(ii) The PM average emission rate for each of Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall not exceed 0.015 lb./MMBtu as measured by EPA Reference Method 5 stack tests conducted at least once each calendar quarter at times and conditions specified by the Department, and according to test protocols approved by the Department, but in all cases under conditions and in a manner no less stringent than described in EPA's 2004 Clean Air Act National Stack Testing Guidance. PNM shall submit all results and a complete description of the tests to Plaintiffs and the Department in the next quarterly report following PNM's receipt of the results.
(iii) The opacity limit for San Juan Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall be twenty (20) percent, averaged over any six (6) minute period except for one six (6) minute average per hour
-10-
of up to twenty-seven (27) percent opacity. This limit shall apply at all times when air pollutants are being discharged into the atmosphere, unless PNM demonstrates that any excess opacity reading: (a) was caused by a startup, shutdown, malfunction, or emergency, or (b) occurred when both the boiler and all fans that move flue gas in the unit were off. Opacity shall be measured in the stack or, if approved by EPA, after the outlet of the baghouse and corrected to stack exit.
(iv) Load changes, poor coal quality, air heater cleaning, sootblowing, and high ash hoppers shall not excuse any excess opacity reading.
(v) PNM shall report any exceedance of the opacity limit described above in the next quarterly report following the exceedance.
(vi) If PNM claims that an excess opacity reading was caused by a startup, shutdown, malfunction, or emergency, or occurred when both the boiler and all fans that move flue gas in the unit were off, it shall notify the Department (a) by facsimile no later than twenty-four (24) hours after the start of the next business day, and (b) in writing no later than ten (10) calendar days after the start of the first business day following the reading (or the first reading in the event of a series of excess readings). With respect to the written notification, PNM shall use the applicable excess emission form published by the Department. To the extent PNM claims a defense described in this subparagraph to an excess opacity reading, it shall disclose such claim in its next quarterly report following the excess opacity reading, attach the facsimile and excess emission form filed with the Department, and describe any relevant revisions and amendments to the information in the facsimile and excess emission form filed with the Department, including (1) the date and time of facsimile and written notification to the Department, (2) the cause of the excess opacity reading(s), (3) actions that PNM took to correct the causes of the excess opacity reading(s), (4) all actions that PNM will take to prevent the causes of the excess opacity reading(s) from recurring. PNM's failure
-11-
to materially comply with any requirement specified above shall waive any claim that an excess opacity reading was caused by a startup, shutdown, malfunction, or emergency, or occurred when both the boiler and all fans that move flue gas in the unit were off.
(vii) For purposes of this Consent Decree, if Plaintiffs or the Department disagree with any claim of defense described in this subparagraph regarding any excess opacity reading, they shall inform PNM in writing within 180 days of such disagreement. However, any disagreement shall not be subject to Section XII (Dispute Resolution) unless Plaintiffs or the Department expressly state that their disagreement represents a final determination regarding the excess opacity reading, or the Plaintiffs or the Department issue a demand for stipulated penalties regarding the excess opacity reading. Any final determination or demand for stipulated penalties shall be binding upon PNM within thirty (30) days of receipt unless PNM invokes Section XII (Dispute Resolution).
(viii) PNM shall determine compliance with the opacity limit above on a continuous basis using data from the current COMS or an EPA-approved COMS at an alternative location.
(ix) No later than sixty (60) days after the effective date of this Decree, PNM shall submit a report to Plaintiffs and the Department that identifies the technology and operational parameters that represent demonstrated state-of-the-art demister control for each unit, and that determines the extent to which the existing demister technology and operational parameters constitute demonstrated state-of-the-art demister control for each unit. The report shall be reviewed pursuant to Section IX (Approvals). Within ninety (90) days of approval by Plaintiffs and the Department, PNM shall install such technology to the extent it has not already
-12-
been installed and is in operation. PNM shall operate and maintain demonstrated state-of-the-art demister technology on San Juan Units 1, 2, 3, and 4, and implement operational parameters to maximize the reduction of acid mist, scrubber carry-over, and any other liquid particulate matter emitted from such units,
(b) NO X
(i) PNM shall design, install, and operate demonstrated state-of-the-art NO X combustion control technology on San Juan Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 to minimize the formation of NO X from each unit. PNM shall contract with one or more expert(s) on the technologies to identify demonstrated state-of-the-art NO X combustion control equipment and operational requirements for each unit. The expert(s) shall prepare a report describing the recommended control equipment and operational requirements for each unit, including an explanation of the reasons that such equipment and requirements constitute demonstrated state of-the-art NO X combustion control technology. No later than 180 days after the effective date of this Decree, PNM shall submit the report to Plaintiffs and the Department. The report shall be reviewed pursuant to Section IX (Approvals).
(ii) Upon approval by Plaintiffs and the Department, PNM shall install and operate NO X combustion control technology to meet the following NO X emission limits.
(iii) The thirty (30) day rolling average emission rate for NO X for each of San Juan Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall not exceed 0.30 lb./MMBtu. For purposes of calculating the thirty (30) day rolling average, NO X emissions for the first three (3) hours of a cold startup after coal is fed to the boiler shall be capped at 0.30 lb./MMBtu. Cold startup is defined as a startup when the boiler is at ambient indoor temperature measured at the time fuel is first fed to the boiler. No later than sixty (60) days after the first twelve (12) months of operation of the new NO x
-13-
combustion control technology installed at each unit, PNM shall submit a report to Plaintiffs and the Department (a) identifying the daily average NO X emission rate for each unit for every operating day in the period and the thirty (30) day rolling average emission rate for every calendar day of the period, (b) describing the performance of the NO X control technology at each unit, and (c) evaluating the extent to which the 0.30 lb./MMBtu limit can be lowered at each unit based on the performance of each unit during the first twelve (12) months of operation of the new NO X combustion control technology. The report shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedure in Section IX (Approvals). Upon approval of Plaintiffs and the Department, the 0.30 lb./MMBtu limit shall be adjusted to a lower limit for the unit if the data gathered during the first twelve (12) months of operation indicate that a given unit is capable of meeting a lower limit, provided, however, that any final NO X limit for a given unit shall add a ten (10) percent margin of safety to the most representative thirty (30) day average emission rate achieved during the first twelve (12) months of operation.
(iv) PNM shall report any exceedance of the NO X limits described above in the next quarterly report following the exceedance.
(v) Compliance with NO X emission limits imposed by this Decree shall be determined on a unit-specific basis using data from NO X CEMS installed and operated in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Part 75 and any other applicable requirement,
(c) SO 2
(i) PNM shall take those measures necessary to reduce SO 2 emissions at San Juan to achieve and maintain the emission limits below.
(ii) The annual rolling average SO 2 percentage reduction for San Juan Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall not be less than ninety (90) percent for each unit.
-14-
(iii) The seven (7) day average emission rate of SO 2 at San Juan Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall not exceed 0.250 lb./MMBtu for each unit, calculated as a block average as measured by SO 2 CEMS located downstream of the scrubber outlet and any scrubber by-pass return. For purposes of calculating the block average, SO 2 emissions for the first three (3) hours of a cold startup after coal is fed to the boiler shall be capped at 0.250 lb./MMBtu. Cold startup is defined as a startup when the boiler is at ambient indoor temperature measured at the time fuel is first fed to the boiler.
(iv) PNM shall report any exceedance of the limits described above in the next quarterly report following the exceedance.
(v) SO 2 CEMS shall be used to demonstrate compliance with these requirements and shall be installed and operated in accordance with the provisions of this Decree, 40 C.F.R. Part 75 and any other applicable requirement,
(d) Mercury
(i) PNM shall design activated carbon injection technology (or comparable mercury reduction technology) for San Juan Units 3 and 4 for the purpose of maximizing mercury reduction, within the physical and operational constraints of each unit, including the pollution control equipment to be operated at each unit after the deadlines in Section VIII ("physical and operational constraints"). No later than one year after the effective date of this Decree, PNM shall submit a report to Plaintiffs and the Department describing such design and the relevant physical and operational constraints of each unit. The report shall be reviewed pursuant to Section IX (Approvals).
(ii) Within the deadlines established under Section VII (Construction Compliance Deadlines), PNM shall install and operate the mercury control technology, install
-15-
mercury CEMs, and establish operating procedures to maximize mercury reduction for Units 3 and 4 during a test period of one and one half (1½ ) years from the commencement of operation of the mercury reduction technology on the first unit. No later than ninety (90) days after such test period, PNM shall submit a report to Plaintiffs and the Department presenting the results of PNM's efforts to reduce mercury emissions and identifying and discussing the bases for operational parameters to achieve maximum mercury reduction, taking into account the physical and operational constraints of each unit. The report shall be reviewed pursuant to Section IX (Approvals).
(iii) Upon approval by Plaintiffs and the Department, the operational parameters for Units 3 and 4 shall become enforceable under this Decree. PNM shall report compliance with the operational parameters in the quarterly reports required by this Decree.
(iv) PNM shall install and operate similar mercury reduction technology and shall be subject to similar, enforceable operational parameters at Units 1 and 2, to achieve maximum mercury reduction, taking into account the physical and operational constraints of each unit. PNM shall report compliance with the operational parameters in the quarterly reports required by this Decree.
VI. EMISSIONS MONITORING
10. PNM shall maintain, calibrate, and operate COMS to measure the opacity of emissions at San Juan in compliance with the requirements of its Operating Permit and 40 C.F.R. Part 60.
11. To the extent PNM intends to change the current location of the COMS in the stack of a unit to a location after the baghouse and before the SO 2 scrubber, PNM shall request approval from EPA for any such alternative COMS location pursuant to 40 C.F.R. Parts 60 and
-16-
75 and any other applicable requirement. PNM shall provide copies of any requests for approval and subsequent related correspondence and documents to Plaintiffs and the Department no later than seven (7) days after their submittal or receipt. Until EPA approves an alternative location, PNM shall use the current COMS to determine compliance with the opacity limit.
12. After the effective date of this Decree, PNM shall maintain, calibrate, and operate CEMS at San Juan Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 to measure accurately and continuously the emissions of SO 2 , NO X , and total exhaust from each unit in full compliance with the requirements of 40 C.F.R. Parts 60 and 75, including requirements for heat input rate measurements. Nothing herein shall preclude PNM from installing, certifying, and operating integrated CEMS equipment to measure SO 2 , NO X , opacity, or any combination thereof.
13. PNM shall ensure that any modification to a COMS or CEMS necessitated by PNM's actions under or in furtherance of this Decree shall be completed prior to the operation of the SO 2 , NO X , and PM controls required by this Decree.
14. PNM shall recertify all COMS and CEMS at San Juan as required by 40 C.F.R. Parts 60 and 75.
15. No later than seven (7) operating days after the first passage of flue gas through the SO 2 controls for each unit, PNM shall calculate for all hours during which pollutants are discharged from the stack in each operating day: (a) the SO 2 hourly average percentage reduction, and (b) the SO 2 hourly average emission rate.
16. No later than thirty (30) days after the first startup following construction of NO X controls for each unit, PNM shall begin to calculate the hourly average NO X emission rate.
17. For any hour that valid, quality-assured CEM data for a unit is unavailable, PNM shall calculate the SO 2 and NO X emissions for the unit in accordance with the missing data
-17-
substitution procedures in 40 C.F.R. Part 75.
18. Except for COMS or CEMS breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments as provided in 40 C.F.R. § 60.13(e), PNM shall be bound by the data from its COMS and NO X and SO 2 CEMS, and shall not challenge the accuracy or credibility of its COMS and NO X and SO 2 CEMS in any action under this Decree.
VII. CONSTRUCTION COMPLIANCE DEADLINES
19. PNM shall design, contract, construct, and complete all PM, SO 2 , NO X , and mercury controls required by this Decree according to the following schedule, subject only to force majeure under Section XIII:
Activity Deadline
(a) San Juan Unit 4.
(i) Commence physical, on-site construction of PM, SO 2 , NO X , and mercury controls 10/31/06
(ii) Complete construction and initiate startup of PM, SO 2 , NO X , and mercury controls 10/31/07 10/31/07-
(iii) Provide
opportunity for on-site 12/31/07
inspection by Plaintiffs and Department
(b) San Juan Unit 3.
(i) Commence physical, on-site construction of PM, SO 2 , NO X , and mercury controls 4/30/07
(ii) Completion of construction and initiate startup of PM, SO 2 , NO X , and mercury controls 4/30/08
(iii) Provide
opportunity for on-site 4/30/08 - 6/30/08
inspection by Plaintiffs and Department
-18-
(c) San Juan Unit 1.
(i) Commence physical, on-site construction of PM, SO 2 , and NO x controls 10/31/07
(ii) Complete construction and initiate startup of PM, SO 2 , and NO x controls 10/31/08 10/31/08-
(iii) Provide
opportunity for on-site
12/31/08
inspection by Plaintiffs and Department
(iv) Commence construction of mercury controls 9/30/09
(v) Complete construction and initiate mercury controls 12/31/09
(d) San Juan Unit 2.
(i) Commence physical, on-site construction of PM, SO 2 , andNO x controls 3/31/08
(ii) Complete construction and initiate startup of PM, SO 2 , andNO x controls 3/31/09 3/31/09-
(iii) Provide opportunity for on-site inspection by Plaintiffs and Department 5/31/09
(iv) Commence construction of mercury controls 9/30/09
(v) Complete construction and initiate mercury controls 12/31/09
(vi) Provide opportunity for on-site inspection by Plaintiffs and Department. 12/31/09-3/31/10
VIII. EMISSION LIMITATION COMPLIANCE DEADLINES
20. PNM's obligation to comply with the Opacity, PM, SO 2 , and NO X emission limitations, and mercury emission reduction operational requirements described in Section V (Emission Controls and Limitations) shall commence on the dates listed below, subject only to force majeure under Section X in (Force Majeure).
-19-
(a) Opacity. PM. NO x , and SO 2 Emission Limits:
(i) For Unit 4, no later than ninety (90) days after completion of construction of PM, NO X , and SO 2 controls, or by December 31, 2007, whichever date is earlier.
(ii) For Unit 3, no later than ninety (90) days after completion of construction of PM, NO X , and SO 2 controls, or by June 30, 2008, whichever date is earlier.
(iii) For Unit 1, no later than ninety (90) days after completion of construction of PM, NO X , and SO 2 controls, or by December 31, 2008, whichever date is earlier.
(iv) For Unit 2, no later than ninety (90) days after completion of construction of PM, NO X , and SO 2 controls, or by May 31, 2009, whichever date is earlier.
(b) Mercury Reduction Operational Requirements
(i) For Units 3 and 4, no later than sixty (60) days after approval of operational requirements for each unit, or by June 30, 2009, whichever date is earlier.
(ii) For Units 1 and 2, no later than (45) days after completion of construction of mercury controls, or by January 30, 2010, whichever date is earlier.
IX. APPROVALS
21. After receiving any report for approval under this Decree, Plaintiffs and the Department shall have twenty (20) business days from receipt of the report to provide written notice of approval or disapproval, in whole or in part. By notice from Plaintiffs or the Department to PNM, this deadline may be extended by no more than twenty (20) additional business days. If the deadline is so extended then any compliance deadline related to such approval shall be extended for the same number of days. If Plaintiffs and the Department do not provide timely written notice, the report shall be deemed to be approved. If the Plaintiffs and/or the Department disapprove a report, in whole or in part, the disapproving party shall state the
-20-
reason(s) and justification(s) for its disapproval. No later than twenty (20) business days after receipt of the written notice of disapproval, PNM shall either (a) accept the disapproving party's position, (b) resolve the issue with the disapproving party and obtain agreement from the remaining party, or (c) initiate the procedure in Section XII (Dispute Resolution). The resolution of a disapproval by one of the three methods shall constitute approval for the purpose of this Decree. Notwithstanding the above procedure, the Parties shall make their best effort to resolve issues regarding the approval of reports through informal consultation and without resort to the procedure in Section XII (Dispute Resolution). Plaintiffs reserve their right to seek from PNM their reasonable costs and fees in evaluating and otherwise addressing PNM's reports under this Section IX (Approvals). PNM reserves its right to oppose any request for costs and fees by Plaintiffs.
X. REPORTING
22. No later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each quarter, beginning with the first quarter of 2005 and continuing until this Decree is terminated under Section XXIV, PNM shall provide a quarterly report to the Plaintiffs and the Department containing the information for the immediately preceding quarter that PNM is required to report on a quarterly basis under this Decree.
23. Each quarterly report shall begin with a cover letter, signed by a representative of PNM, that summarizes the information contained in the report.
24. Each quarterly report shall include, for each San Juan unit:
(a) a description of construction deadlines achieved, projects completed, progress made toward meeting future deadlines, and any actual, expected or reasonably foreseeable delays;
-21-
(b) identification of all excess opacity readings and any exceedances of the current SO 2 and NO X emission limits described in Section XI (Stipulated Penalties).
(c) identification of each failure to meet a standard or emission limitation or operational requirement described in Section V (Emission Controls and Limitations) or a deadline in Section VIII (Emission Limitation Compliance Deadlines);
(d) the quarterly report described in 40 C.F.R. § 60.7;
(e) after installation of the PM controls, the required quarterly reports for PM and opacity,
(f) after installation of the SO 2 controls, PNM shall report on a quarterly basis all seven (7) day block averages that exceeded the applicable emission limitation. PNM shall also report each day for which the annual rolling SO 2 percentage reduction average emission rate at any unit exceeded the applicable reduction requirement during the prior quarter. In addition, PNM shall report on a quarterly basis a list of the hours excluded from the determination of compliance with the applicable emission limitation.
(g) after installation of the NO X controls, the required quarterly reports for NO X emissions;
(h) after installation of the mercury control equipment, the required quarterly reports
for mercury (Hg) emissions; and
(i) a description of any stipulated penalties due or paid to the Department, or into
escrow, including the reason for such payment(s) and the total amount held in
escrow at the end of each quarter.
-22-
25. If Plaintiffs or the Department request clarification of any quarterly report, including a request for information not provided in such report, PNM promptly shall provide such clarification or information. If the information is requested in electronic form PNM shall provide it to the extent available. PNM shall retain all documents relating to compliance with this Decree, including contracts, plans, and specifications, in accordance with Section XVIII (Record Preservation). Upon request of the Department, PNM shall supply a copy of such documents, subject to a claim of confidential business information under the New Mexico Air Quality Control Act. Upon request of the Plaintiffs, PNM shall provide a copy of such documents as long as Plaintiffs execute a reasonable confidentiality agreement that strictly limits release of the confidential business information to Plaintiffs and their counsel and experts. If Plaintiffs do not agree with PNM's claim of confidential business information Plaintiffs may invoke the dispute resolution procedure in Section XII (Dispute Resolution).
26. PNM's obligation to provide quarterly reports is in addition to any other notification or report required by this Decree or by PNM's operating permit, unless such notification or report is required on a quarterly basis. Nothing in this Decree shall be interpreted to excuse or diminish PNM's obligation to provide any other notice report, or other document to the public or local, state or federal officials.
XI. STIPULATED PENALTIES
27. PNM shall pay stipulated penalties for each failure by PNM to comply with a term or condition of this Decree, unless excused by Section XIII (Force Majeure) or Section XII (Dispute Resolution). All stipulated penalties shall be calculated on a per unit, per day basis, unless expressly stated otherwise. Stipulated penalties shall not be assessed for any reason other than those set forth in this Section.
-23-
28. For each failure to comply with a construction commencement deadline:
(a) 1 st through 30 th day after deadline - $750
(b) 31 st through 60 th day after deadline -$5,000
(c) Beyond 60 th day - $ 10,000
29. For each failure to comply with a construction completion deadline:
(a) 1 st through 30 th day after deadline - $3,000
(b) 31 st through 60 th day after deadline - $ 10,000
(c) Beyond 60 th day - $20,000.
30. PNM shall maintain a record of all stipulated penalties that accrue pursuant to paragraph 28 for each unit. If PNM meets the construction completion deadline for a unit, PNM shall not be obligated to pay any accrued stipulated penalties under this paragraph for that unit. If PNM does not meet the construction completion deadline for a unit, PNM shall pay all accrued penalties for that unit, including interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 (a).
31. For each failure to comply with a PM emission limit, $2,500, with the period of noncompliance commencing with the failure of a PM stack test and ending when a PM stack test demonstrates compliance, except for periods when the unit is not in operation.
32. For each excess opacity reading from San Juan Units 1, 3, and 4, excluding only excess readings caused by a startup or shutdown, or that occurred when both the boiler and all fans that move flue gas in the unit were off, stipulated penalties shall be determined on a quarterly basis for the period of time beginning with the quarter in which this Decree is entered until the first quarter in which flue gas first passes through the baghouse for that unit:
(a) Unit l:
Stipulated penalties will be due for each excess opacity reading above the following
-24-
quarterly threshold amounts: 150 excess opacity readings/quarter for 2005; 125 excess opacity readings/quarter for 2006; 100 excess opacity readings/quarter for 2007; and 75 excess opacity readings/quarter for 2008 and thereafter.
(b) Units 3 and 4:
Stipulated penalties will be due for each excess opacity reading above the following quarterly threshold amounts, by unit: 14 excess opacity readings/quarter for 2005; 12 excess opacity readings/quarter for 2006; 10 excess opacity readings/quarter for 2007; and 8 excess opacity readings/quarter for 2008 and thereafter.
(c) The stipulated penalty for any quarterly excess opacity readings at San Juan Units 1, 3 or 4 shall equal $1,000 per excess opacity reading above the values specified above, except that the stipulated penalty for the first ten (10) percent of the excess opacity readings above the quarterly thresholds for Unit 1 only shall be $750. Payment of all stipulated penalties pursuant to this paragraph shall be made, without written demand therefor into a commercially available escrow account, within thirty (30) days of the end of the applicable quarter.
33. For every calendar year, beginning on January 1, 2005 for each unit, if the average number of excess opacity readings per quarter for four (4) quarters is less than the applicable quarterly threshold as set forth above, all stipulated penalties and interest that have accrued in the escrow account during that year shall be refunded to PNM. However, if the average number of excess opacity readings per quarter in that calendar year is greater than the applicable quarterly threshold as set forth above, all stipulated penalties and interest that have accrued in the escrow account during that year shall be paid to the Department. In any calendar year in which there are less than 365 days before flue gas first passes through the baghouse of any unit, the number of excess opacity readings for the balance of the 365 days shall be determined by the following formula: N = (A ÷ 90)D; where:
N = Number of excess opacity readings added to complete the 365 day period;
A = Number of excess opacity readings from the most recent preceding complete
quarter for the applicable unit; and
D = Number of days needed to complete 365 day period.
-25-
34. For each failure to comply with an opacity standard after the applicable final compliance date until termination of this Decree, the stipulated penalty shall be $2,000 per excess reading, excluding excess emissions caused by startup, shutdown, malfunction, and emergency.
35. For each failure to comply with a current SO 2 emission limit at San Juan between the effective date of this Decree and the date specified in Paragraph 20(a), stipulated penalties shall be $1,500 per violation, excluding excess emissions excused by the Department pursuant to Section 20.2.7 NMAC. Such SO 2 emission limits are:
(a) For all four (4) units combined, 13,000 pounds per hour on a rolling 3-hour average,
(b) For all four (4) units combined, 0.55 lb./MMBtu on a rolling 30-day average, and
(c) For all four (4) units combined, 0.46 lb./MMBtu on a rolling hourly annual average.
(d) For Units 1, 3 and 4, by unit, 1.2 lb./MMBtu on a rolling 3-hour average.
(e) For Unit 2, seventy-two (72) percent SO 2 reduction on a 30-day rolling average.
36. For each failure to comply with any SO 2 emission limit in Section V (Emission Controls and Limitations) after the date specified in Section VIII (Emission Limitation Compliance Deadlines), $5,000 per violation.
37. For each failure to comply with a current NO X emission limit at San Juan between the effective date of this Decree and the date specified in Section VIII (Emission Limitation Compliance Deadlines), excluding only excess readings caused by a startup or shutdown, stipulated penalties shall be determined on a quarterly basis as provided in paragraph 38. The
-26-
current NO X emission limits are:
(a) For all four (4) units combined, 9,000 pounds per hour on a rolling twenty-four (24) hour period.
(b) For Units 1, 3 and 4, by unit, 0.45 lb./MMBtu on a rolling three (3) hour average.
(c) For Unit 2, 0.7 lb./MMBtu on a rolling three (3) hour average.
38. The quarterly excess NO X emission thresholds, by unit, are as follows:
(a) Unit l:
Stipulated penalties will be due for each hour of excess NO X emissions above the following quarterly threshold amounts: 20 excess NO X emissions/quarter for 2005; 15 excess NO X emissions/quarter for 2006 and thereafter.
(b) Units 2, 3 and 4:
Stipulated penalties will be due for each hour of excess NO X emissions above the following quarterly threshold amounts: 2 excess NO X emission/quarter for each unit for 2005 and thereafter.
(c) The stipulated penalty for any quarterly excess NO X emission at San Juan shall equal $5,000 per each hour of excess NO X emission above the values specified above. Payment of all stipulated penalties pursuant to this paragraph shall be made, without written demand therefor into a commercially available escrow account, within thirty (30) days of the end of the applicable quarter.
39. For every calendar year, beginning on January 1, 2005 for each unit, if the average number of hourly excess NO X emissions per quarter for four (4) quarters is less than the applicable quarterly threshold as set forth above, all stipulated penalties and interest that have accrued in the escrow account during that year shall be refunded to PNM. However, if the average number of hourly excess NO X emissions per quarter in that calendar year is greater than the applicable quarterly threshold as set forth above, all stipulated penalties and interest that have accrued in the escrow account during that year shall be paid to the Department. In any calendar year in which there are less than 365 days before the NO X emission limit deadline in Section VIII
-27-
(Emission Limitation Compliance Deadlines) applicable to any unit, the number of excess hourly NO X emissions for the balance of the 365 days shall be determined by the following formula:
N = (A ÷ 90)D; where:
N = Number of excess hourly NO X emissions added to complete the 365 day period;
A = Number of excess hourly NO X emissions from the most recent preceding complete
quarter for the applicable unit; and
D = Number of days needed to complete 365 day period.
40. For each failure to comply with the NO X emission limit after the date specified in Section VIII (Emission Limitation Compliance Deadlines), $5,000 per violation.
41. For each failure to comply with a mercury reduction operational requirement, $5,000 per violation.
42. For the failure to comply with any other material requirement in the Decree, $1,000 per violation.
43. Plaintiffs and the Department will consult regarding demands for stipulated penalties. Plaintiffs or the Department may demand stipulated penalties individually or jointly, and the fact that one party does not make a demand for stipulated penalties shall not be relevant to the merits of any other demand. Plaintiffs and the Department shall provide to the other a copy of any written demand for stipulated penalties at the same time that the demand is served on PNM.
44. No later than thirty (30) days after receipt of a written demand for stipulated penalties, PNM shall pay the stipulated penalties to the Department. Payment shall be by check, made payable to the State of New Mexico, and delivered to:
-28-
Office of General
Counsel
New Mexico
Environment Department
Post Office Box
26110
Santa Fe, New Mexico
87502
The check shall be accompanied by a transmittal letter referencing this Decree and attaching a copy of the written demand. PNM shall send a copy of the check and transmittal letter to the legal representatives for the Plaintiffs.
45. If PNM disputes the written demand for stipulated penalties, no later than thirty (30) days after receipt, PNM shall pay the stipulated penalties into a commercially available interest-bearing escrow account (interest computed consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 1961 (a)) and invoke the procedures in Section XII (Dispute Resolution).
46. PNM's liability for stipulated penalties shall not depend on the date that Plaintiffs or the Department send or that PNM receives the written demand. Stipulated penalties shall apply during any period of dispute resolution; provided, however, that PNM may request that the Court reduce or eliminate stipulated penalties that accrue during the dispute resolution period if the Court deems that PNM pursued the dispute in good faith and not for the purpose of delay, without regard to whether PNM prevails in the dispute.
47. Plaintiffs and the Department reserve all rights to pursue any other remedies for violations of this Decree to which they are entitled, including injunctive relief.
XII. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
48. Any dispute identified in this Decree to be resolved by dispute resolution shall be subject to the procedures in this Section. The dispute resolution procedure of this Section XII (Dispute Resolution) shall be the exclusive mechanism to resolve such disputes. All other disputes regarding this Decree shall be resolved only in the context of an action by Plaintiffs or
-29-
the Department to enforce this Decree.
49. The dispute resolution procedure shall be invoked upon the giving of written notice by one of the parties to all others advising of a dispute and stating the reasons therefor. The party receiving such notice shall acknowledge receipt of the notice and the Parties shall expeditiously schedule a meeting to begin informal negotiations not later than fourteen (14) days from the receipt of such notice. Such period of informal negotiations shall not extend beyond thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the first meeting of the parties, unless the parties agree to extend this period.
50. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute through the informal process described above, the disputing party waives its right to further dispute the issue unless it files a petition with the Court describing the dispute and serves it on the other parties. The other party or parties to the dispute shall have thirty (30) days after receipt of the petition to file and serve a written response. In judicial proceedings under this Section, the petitioning party shall carry the burdens of proof and persuasion. This Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any disputes under this Section XII (Dispute Resolution).
51. The invocation of the dispute resolution procedure under this Section shall not extend, postpone, or affect any obligation of any Party under this Decree not directly in dispute, unless the Parties or the Court agree otherwise. Stipulated penalties with respect to the disputed matter shall continue to accrue, but payment shall be stayed pending resolution of the dispute.
52. Plaintiffs reserve the right to seek from PNM their reasonable costs, including attorney and expert witness fees, expended in any dispute resolution process. PNM reserves its right to object to any such request by Plaintiffs.
-30-
XIII. FORCE MAJEURE
53. For the purpose of this Decree, "force majeure" is defined as any event arising contractors, or employees, that delays, prevents, or can reasonably be anticipated to delay or prevent compliance with this Decree and that could not be overcome with due diligence.
54. PNM's unanticipated or increased costs or changed financial circumstances shall not constitute force majeure. The absence of an approval under this Decree, or the Department's failure to issue a permit if one is legally required before implementing the obligation at issue, or the stay of a permit if issued, shall not constitute force majeure, unless PNM demonstrates that (a) it submitted a timely and complete application or other request for approval, (b) it complied with all requirements for such application or other request for approval, and (c) it diligently and timely responded to all requests for additional information.
55. If any event occurs which causes or may cause a delay by PNM in meeting any deadline of this Decree, whether or not attributable to force majeure, PNM shall give written notice to Plaintiffs and the Department no later than ten (10) business days after the date on which PNM first knew or reasonably should have known that the event might cause a delay. PNM shall be deemed to have notice of any event that a contractor or subcontractor retained to implement this Decree had or reasonably should have had, unless through the affirmative misrepresentation of such contractor or subcontractor PNM was not provided such notice. No later than fifteen (15) days after service of the written notice, PNM shall submit a written report to Plaintiffs and the Department providing (a) the reasons for the delay, (b) the anticipated length of the delay, (c) a description of the obligation has been or would be delayed, (d) a description of all actions taken and to be taken to prevent or minimize the delay, (e) a timetable for those
-31-
actions, (f) a schedule for complying with any deadline in this Decree which has been or would be affected by the event, and (g) the rationale and supporting documentation for a claim, if any, that the delay was or would be attributable to force majeure.
56. If Plaintiffs and the Department agree that the delay has been or would be caused by force majeure, the Parties may stipulate to an extension of the deadline for the length of time necessary to accommodate the force majeure. In establishing a new deadline, Plaintiffs and the Department shall take into consideration PNM's evidence regarding weather, outage schedules, and remobilization requirements. If the Parties cannot agree to the length of the extension, PNM may invoke the procedure in Section XII (Dispute Resolution).
57. If Plaintiffs and/or the Department do not agree that the delay or anticipated delay has been or would be caused by force majeure, no later than twenty (20) days after receiving PNM's written report, Plaintiffs and/or the Department shall notify PNM in writing of this decision. The decision shall be final and binding on PNM unless PNM invokes the procedure in Section XII (Dispute Resolution).
58. PNM shall have the burden of proving that any delay or anticipated delay has been or would be caused by force majeure (including proving that PNM gave timely notice), and of proving the duration and extent of any delay(s).
59. PNM's material failure to comply with the notification and reporting requirements of this Section XII (Force Majeure) shall constitute a waiver of any claim of force majeure for the delay or anticipated delay at issue.
60. The extension of one deadline based on a specific event shall not constitute an extension of any other deadline unless agreed by the Parties or directed by this Court.
-32-
61. If PNM fails to comply with a deadline in this Decree due to force majeure, PNM shall be excused only from complying with that deadline and from paying stipulated penalties for failing to comply with that deadline, and only for that period of time excused by force majeure.
XIV. MODIFICATION
62. Any material modification of this Decree shall be in writing, signed by the Parties, and approved by this Court. Non-material modifications of this Decree shall be made upon written agreement of the Parties and shall be filed with the Court.
XV. NOTICE TO PARTIES
63. Whenever this Decree requires a Party to provide notice or submit a document to another Party, the notice or document shall be sent to the following persons in electronic (.pdf) format unless the size or other characteristic of the notice or document require the submission of a hard copy.
For Plaintiffs
George Hays, Esq. |
|
Attorney at Law |
|
Steven Sugarman, Esq. |
236 West Portal Avenue, #110 |
Belin & Sugarman |
San Francisco, CA 94127 |
618 Paseo de Peralta |
Phone: 415-566-5414 |
Santa Fe, NM 87501 |
Fax: 415-731-1609 |
Phone: 505-983-1700 |
georgehays@mindspring.com |
Fax: 505-983-0036 |
|
sugarman@bs-law.com |
For the Department |
Reed Zars, Esq. |
Sandra Ely, Chief |
Attorney at Law |
Air Quality Bureau |
910 Kearney St. |
New Mexico Environment Department |
Laramie, WY 82070 |
2048 Galisteo Street |
Phone: 307-745-7979 |
Santa Fe, NM 87505 |
Fax: 307-745-7999 |
Phone: 505-827-1494 |
rzars@lariat.org |
Fax: 505-827-1523 |
sandra_ely@nmenv.state.nm.us |
-33-
Eric Ames, Esq.
Office of General
Counsel
New Mexico Environment Department
1190 St. Francis Dr.
P.O. Box 26110
Santa Fe,NM 87502-6110
Phone: 505-827-2982
Fax: 505-827-1628
eric_ames@nmenv.state.nm.us
For PNM
Rick Alvidrez, Esq.
Keleher & McLeod, P.A.
P.O.
Drawer AA Albuquerque, NM 87103
Phone:
505-346-9150
Fax: 505-346-1370
rla@keleher-law.com
Randy E. Brogdon,
Esq.
Troutman Sanders LLP
Bank of America
Plaza, Suite 5200
600 Peachtree St. NE
Atlanta, GA 30308-2216
Phone:(404)885-3147
Fax: (404) 962-6892
Randy.Brogdon@troutmansanders.com
Hugh Smith
Senior Vice
President, Energy Resources
Public Service
Company of New Mexico
2401 Aztec Rd, NE
Albuquerque, NM 87107
Phone: (505)
855-6296
Fax:(505) 855-6327
HSmithl@pnm.com
64. A Party may change the name, title, address, telephone number, fax number, or email address of a contact person identified above by providing written notice to the other Parties. Such change shall not constitute a modification for the purpose of Section XIV (Modification).
-34-
XVI. ENTRY AND INSPECTION
65. Nothing in this Decree shall be construed to limit or impair the Department's authority under the applicable laws and regulations to enter and inspect San Juan.
XVII. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
66. Nothing in this Decree shall be construed to limit or impair the Department's authority under the applicable laws and regulations to require PNM to provide information regarding San Juan.
XVIII. RECORD PRESERVATION
67. For at least ten (10) years after termination of this Decree, PNM shall maintain all records, documents, data, and other information related to this Decree. Nothing in this Decree shall be construed as a waiver of any attorney client, attorney work product, or other privilege that PNM might otherwise possess.
XIX. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS
68. PNM shall undertake the obligations required by this Decree in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations.
69. This Decree is not a permit. The emission limits and related requirements contained in this Decree, however, shall be incorporated into permits consistent with Section XXIII (Integration with Permits). This Decree does not relieve PNM of its responsibility to comply with all federal, state, and local laws and regulations and orders of this Court.
70. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any current or future federal, state, or local law or regulation conflicts with, or have the effect of relaxing, any requirement in this Decree, the more stringent requirement shall apply.
-35-
XX. EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT
71. This Decree constitutes a complete and final release of all civil claims for violations alleged in the complaints, draft compliance orders, and second notice of intent to sue through the effective date of this Decree.
72. Nothing in this Decree shall be construed to create any rights in or grant any cause of action to any person not a Party to this Decree. The preceding sentence shall not be construed to waive or nullify any rights that a person not a signatory to this Decree may have under applicable law. Plaintiffs and the Department expressly reserve all rights, defenses, claims, demands, and causes of action that they might have against PNM with respect to any matter, transaction, or occurrence relating to San Juan that is not addressed in this Decree. PNM expressly reserves all rights and defenses which it may have to any claim, demand, or cause of action relating to San Juan that is not addressed in this Decree. The Parties expressly reserve all rights, defenses, claims, demands, and causes of action which each Party may have against any person not a Party to this Decree with respect to any matter, transaction, or occurrence relating to San Juan. Nothing in this Decree shall be construed as a waiver of any privilege by a Party.
73. As long as PNM remains in compliance with the requirements in this Decree, Plaintiffs and the Department covenant not to sue PNM, its officers, employees, agents, successors, or assigns for matters alleged in the complaints, draft compliance orders, and second notice of intent to sue. Nothing herein shall prevent Plaintiffs or the Department from seeking any legal or equitable remedy to enforce the requirements of this Decree. This covenant not to sue does not pertain to any matters not alleged in the complaints, draft compliance orders, or second notice of intent to sue. Plaintiffs and the Department expressly reserve all rights, defenses, claims, demands, and causes of action which they may have against PNM with respect
-36-
to any matter, transaction, or occurrence that was not alleged in the complaints, draft compliance orders, or second notice of intent to sue. PNM represents and warrants that it has not notified Plaintiffs or the Department of any claims or alleged violations that are not included in the matters alleged in the complaint, draft compliance orders, or second notice of intent to sue at San Juan, and Plaintiffs and the Department represent and warrant that they are not presently aware of any claims or alleged violations at San Juan that are not included in the matters alleged in the complaint, draft compliance orders, or second notice of intent to sue.
74. Nothing herein shall prevent the Department from taking appropriate action to address conditions at San Juan that constitute an emergency situation or that present an immediate threat to public health or the environment.
75. This covenant not to sue shall survive the termination of this Decree as an agreement between PNM, Plaintiffs and the Department. This Decree shall not be used to establish the liability of PNM in any action, except to enforce the provisions of this Decree.
76. Plaintiffs Grand Canyon Trust and Sierra Club, and the Department, but not the Attorney General acting to represent the interests of residential and small business customers, agree not to contest, appeal or otherwise challenge a request by any owner of San Juan to recover the costs to install and operate the pollution control equipment described in this Decree before the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission ("NMPRC") or any other rate-making regulatory agency. PNM's obligations in this Decree shall not be affected by whether any costs associated with the pollution control equipment are deemed recoverable by the NMPRC or any other rate-making regulatory agency.
XXI. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
77. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purpose of implementing
-37-
and enforcing the terms and conditions of the Decree and adjudicating disputes under Section XII (Dispute Resolution) until termination of the Decree.
XXII. ENFORCEMENT
78. This Decree is an enforceable document. If PNM violates any requirement of this Decree, Plaintiffs and/or the Department may request any legal or equitable remedy from this Court to achieve full compliance with such requirement. PNM reserves all rights and defenses to an enforcement action by Plaintiffs or the Department not expressly precluded by this Decree, and nothing in this Decree shall constitute a waiver of such rights or defenses.
XXIII. INTEGRATION WITH PERMITS
79. All requirements set forth in Section V (Emission Controls and Limitations) and Section VI (Emissions Monitoring), including all applicable definitions in Section II (Definitions), shall be incorporated as applicable requirements into San Juan's Operating Permit. For incorporation of these applicable requirements into PNM's operating permit, the requirements of this Decree shall be modified such that the role of Plaintiffs and the Department is assumed by the Department.
80. No later than one hundred and eighty (180) days after the effective date of this Decree, PNM shall submit an application to revise its NSR permit to authorize the construction of pollution control equipment required by Section V (Emission Controls and Limitations) of this Decree, if legally required. PNM shall consult with the Department to ensure that the permit application is administratively and technically complete. Plaintiffs may only challenge a provision in such permit to the extent it is not consistent with, or is not addressed by, this Decree.
81. PNM shall incorporate all applicable requirements in the Sections described
-38-
above at such time as it is required to renew its Operating Permit for San Juan; provided, however, that PNM may seek to modify its Operating Permit after the first renewal to incorporate any NO X limit or mercury operational requirements to the extent they became applicable after such renewal. The Department shall include in the revised operating permit those emission limits and other requirements in the current operating and NSR permits; provided, however, the Department shall not relax any limit or requirement of this Decree. PNM shall consult with the Department to ensure that the permit application is administratively and technically complete. Plaintiffs may only challenge a provision in such permit to the extent it is not consistent with, or is not addressed by, this Decree.
82. PNM shall provide a copy of each permit application to Plaintiffs at the same time it is filed with the Department.
83. After termination of this Decree, PNM shall not, in any subsequent application for a modified or renewed Title V permit, seek to revise any applicable requirement in the Sections described above that is to be incorporated into a Title V permit to the extent any such revision would render such requirement less stringent. This agreement shall survive as an enforceable obligation between PNM, and Plaintiffs and the Department.
XXIV. TERMINATION OF CONSENT DECREE
84. This Decree shall remain an enforceable order of the Court until Plaintiffs and the Department agree, or the Court determines in response to a petition by a Party, that (a) all requirements of the Decree have been satisfied, (b) PNM has installed all controls and has been in material compliance with all emission limitations for twelve (12) consecutive months (except for the mercury operational requirements for Units 1 and 2 for which six (6) months compliance will be sufficient), (c) all applicable requirements of the Decree have been incorporated into the
-39-
Operating Permit for San Juan, and (d) PNM has paid any stipulated penalties due under the Decree. Termination of this Decree shall not affect any matter expressly set forth in this Decree that is to survive as an agreement among or between Plaintiffs, the Department, and PNM.
XXV. COSTS
85. PNM agrees that, pursuant to Section 304 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d-), Plaintiffs are entitled to recover their reasonable costs of litigation in this action, including attorney and expert witness fees. The issue of the amount of such costs is reserved. If PNM and Plaintiffs are unable to reach an agreement regarding the amount of such costs, Plaintiffs may petition the Court for a determination of such amount. Furthermore, Plaintiffs expressly reserve their right to petition the Court for recovery of additional costs and fees incurred after they sign this Decree, and PNM reserves its right to oppose any such petition.
XXVI. SEVERABILITY
86. If any provision or authority of this Decree is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, if that provision or authority is severable from the remainder of the Decree, the remainder of the Decree shall remain in force and shall not be affected by the court's order and ruling. If the application of this Decree to any Party or circumstance is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the application of this Decree to other Parties or circumstances shall remain in force and shall not be affected thereby.
XXVII. HEADINGS
87. Any section or paragraph heading in this Decree is provided solely as a matter of convenience to the reader and shall not be construed to alter the meaning of any provision of this Decree.
-40-
XXVIII. NOTICE OF DECREE
88. The Parties agree to cooperate in good faith in order to obtain the Court's review and entry of this Decree.
89. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 7604(c)(3), this Decree shall be lodged with the Court and simultaneously presented to the United States for review and comment for a period not to exceed forty five (45) days. After the review period, the Decree may be entered by the Court. If the Decree is not entered by the Court, the Parties shall retain all rights they had in this litigation or under state law before the lodging of the Decree.
90. The Parties agree to cooperate in good faith to obtain prompt review of this Decree by the United States and the Court. If the United States or the Court comment on the Decree, and as a consequence the Decree is not entered, the Parties agree to discuss such comments and attempt to make such revisions as necessary to obtain entry of the Decree.
XXIX. EFFECTIVE DATE
91. This effective date of this Decree shall be the date on which the Court approves and enters this Decree.
XXX. SIGNATORIES AND ASSIGNMENT
92. Each undersigned representative of a Party to this Decree certifies that he or she is fully authorized to enter into the terms and conditions of this Decree and to execute and legally bind such Party to this document.
93. The Parties agree not to oppose entry of this Decree by this Court or challenge any provision of this Decree.
94. If PNM proposes to sell or transfer all or part of its ownership interest in any of San Juan, prior to such sale or transfer PNM shall advise the purchaser or transferee in writing of
-41-
the purchaser's or transferee's obligation to comply with the terms of this Decree, and PNM shall send a copy of such written notification to the Plaintiffs and the Department at least thirty (30) days before such proposed sale or transfer.
95. The sale or transfer of all or part of PNM's ownership interest in San Juan, or any modification of its status as operator of San Juan, shall not relieve PNM of its obligations to perform under this Decree unless agreed upon by the Parties.
96. If the Plaintiffs and the Department agree, the Parties and any purchaser or transferee that has become a party defendant to this Decree may execute a modification that relieves PNM of its liability under this Decree with respect to the ownership interest to be sold or transferred, and makes the purchaser or transferee liable for all obligations and liabilities applicable to the purchased or transferred ownership interest.
XXXI. COUNTERPARTS
97. This Decree maybe signed in counterparts.
The undersigned Parties enter into this Decree and submit it to this Court for approval and entry.
_______________________________________
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Dated this _________ day of ___________________, 2005
-42-
GRAND CANYON TRUST
/s/ Rick Moore
Date
3/9/05
Rick Moore
Associate Director
Approved as to form:
/s/ Steven
Sugarman
Steven Sugarman
BELIN & SUGARMAN
618 Paseo de Peralta
Santa Fe, NM 87501
505-983-1700
/s/ Reed
Zars
Reed Zars
Attorney at Law
910 Kearny St.
Laramie, WY 82070
307-745-7979
/s/ George E.
Hays
George Hays
Attorney at Law
236 West Portal Avenue, #110
San Francisco, CA 94127
415-566-5414
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Grand Canyon Trust
and Sierra Club
-43-
SIERRA CLUB
/s/ Aaron
Isherwood
Date
March
9, 2005
Aaron Isherwood
Sierra Club Environmental
Law Program
44-
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF
NEW MEXICO
/s/ Jeffry E.
Sterba
Date
3/9/05
Jeffry E. Sterba, Chairman
President and CEO
Approved as to form:
/s/ Richard L. Alvidrez
for
Daniel S. Reinhardt
Randy E. Brogdon
TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP
Bank of America Plaza Suite
5200
600 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30308-2216
(404) 885-3000
FAX - (404) 885-3995
Richard L. Alvidrez
KELEHER & McLEOD, P.A
PO Box AA
Albuquerque, New Mexico
87103
(505) 346-4646
FAX (505) 346-1370
Henry V. Nickel
HUNTON & WILLIAMS
1900 K. Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 955-1500
Attorneys for Defendant
Public Service
Company of New Mexico
-45-
NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT
DEPARTMENT
/s/ Ron
Curry
Date
3/9/05
Ron Curry, Cabinet Secretary
New Mexico Environment
Department
Approved as to form:
/s/ Eric
Ames
Eric Ames, Esq.
Assistant General Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney
General
New Mexico Environment
Department
1190 St. Francis Drive
Santa Fe, New Mexico
87502-6110
(505) 827-2982
-46-
EXHIBIT 10.136
DISTRIBUTION, ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT , dated as of February 24, 2005 (the "Agreement"), by and among LUNA POWER COMPANY, LLC , a Delaware limited liability company (the "Company"), TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY , an Arizona corporation ("TEP"), PNMR DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION , a New Mexico corporation ("PNMR Development"), and PHELPS DODGE ENERGY SERVICES, LLC , a Delaware limited liability company ("PDES") (TEP, PNMR Development and PDES are sometimes individually referred to herein as a "Participant" and collectively as the "Participants").
1. On November 12, 2004, PNM Resources, Inc. ("PNMR"), PDES and TEP purchased all right, title and interest in and to the Company (formerly known as Duke Energy Luna, LLC) which owns a partially constructed approximately 570 MW (nominal) combined cycle natural gas-fired electric generation facility located in Luna County, New Mexico (together with all contract rights, Permits, water rights and other related assets, the "Luna Energy Facility" or the "Project").
2. On the same date, PNMR, PDES and TEP entered into a Transaction Agreement setting out their mutual intent, as the purchasers of the Company, to, among other things, make one or more in-kind distributions to each of the Participants (or, in the case of PNMR, to an affiliate) of the assets and properties of the Company so that each of the Participants (or its designee) would own a thirty-three and one third percent (33 1/3%) undivided ownership interest in such assets and properties.
3. Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement and resolutions duly adopted by PNMR, PDES and TEP on or prior to the date hereof, the Company desires to convey a thirty-three and one third percent (33 1/3%) undivided ownership interest in certain assets and properties owned by the Company, as more particularly described below, and PNMR Development, PDES and TEP desire to assume all obligations of the Company under the assigned assets identified below.
4. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings assigned to them for purposes of the Transaction Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
1. Assignment and Conveyance of Undivided Interests. The Company hereby distributes, assigns, transfers and conveys to each of PNMR Development, PDES, and TEP, respectively, an equal 33 1/3% undivided interest in the Luna Energy Facility (but excluding the Excluded Assets referred to in Section 2), including, without limitation, each of the following assets and properties associated therewith, and the Participants hereby accept such interest:
A. The real property identified as the "Power Plant Site" and the real property identified as the "Wellfield Sites" (including water rights associated therewith), all as more particularly described in Schedule 1A hereto;
B. The permits identified in Schedule 1B hereto, subject to appropriate regulatory notifications, filings, or other requirements, if any (it being understood that certain permits may be in the name of the Operating Agent);
C. The contracts set forth in Schedule 1C hereto; and
D. The personal property and equipment described in Schedule 1D hereto.
2. Excluded Assets. The assignment and conveyance made pursuant to Section 1 shall expressly exclude the following assets or properties (the "Excluded Assets"), ownership of which Excluded Assets shall remain in the Company until such time as the Company, through its Members, shall determine to distribute such assets or properties to the Participants:
A. The easements, licenses and rights-of-way (the "Easements") described in Schedule 2A hereto; and
B. The contracts (the "Excluded Contracts") described in Schedule 2B hereto.
3. No Additional Consideration . No additional consideration shall be paid by the Participants to the Company in connection with the assignment and conveyance provided for herein.
4. Assumption of Obligations . The Participants agree to assume and to be bound by and to perform all of the terms and conditions, covenants and undertakings of the permits and contracts that are the subject of this Agreement.
5 . Proration of taxes . Taxes that may be payable with respect to any of the assets being assigned and conveyed pursuant to this Agreement shall be prorated among the Participants in accordance with the Participants' undivided ownership interests.
6. Further Assurances . The Company and the Participants shall at any time and from time to time and without additional consideration take such actions and deliver such documents as may be necessary to effectuate the purposes of this Agreement. In particular, they shall execute all deeds and other instruments that may be required to carry into the effect the purposes of this Agreement.
7. Governing Law . This Agreement is subject to New Mexico law, without regard to conflicts of law principles.
8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of such counterparts shall together constitute one original. This Agreement may also be executed by facsimile signature and any such executed copies shall be deemed executed and delivered and fully enforceable.
[Remainder of Page Left Intentionally Blank]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Distribution, Assignment and Assumption Agreement as of the 24 th day of February, 2005.
LUNA
POWER COMPANY, LLC
By: /s/ Choi Lee
Name: Choi Lee
Title: Manager
PHELPS DODGE ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
By: /s/ Choi Lee
Name: Choi Lee
Title: Vice President
TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
By: /s/ Michael J. DeConcini
Name: Michael J. DeConcini
Title: Senior Vice President
PNMR DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
By: /s/ Hugh W. Smith
Name: Hugh W. Smith
Title: President
Schedule 1A
Description of Power Plant Site
The Southwest ¼ of the Southwest ¼, the Northwest ¼ of the Southwest ¼, and the Southeast ¼ of the Southwest ¼ of Section 16, Township 23 South, Range 9 West, New Mexico Prime Meridian, Luna County, New Mexico, being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southwest Corner, a found 5/8" rebar, which is common with the Southwest corner of said Section 16, on the center line of Arrowhead Drive, a 60' wide roadway, THENCE N 02䓣'21" E a distance of 1319.89 feet along the West line of the said Southwest ¼ of the Southwest ¼ to a found Culak Surv-Kap, THENCE N 02䓤'05" E a distance of 1319.51 feet along the West line of the Northwest ¼ of the Southwest ¼ to a Culak Surv-Kap at the Northwest corner of the said Northwest ¼ of the Southwest ¼, THENCE S 88䓢'28" E a distance of 1321.25 feet along the North line of the said Northwest ¼ of the Southwest ¼ to a found Culak Surv-Kap at the Northeast corner of the said Northwest ¼ of the Southwest ¼, THENCE S 02$#17636'30" W a distance of 1322.37 feet along the East line of the said Northwest ¼ of the Southwest ¼ to a found Culak Surv-Kap at the Southeast corner of the said Northwest ¼ of the Southwest ¼, THENCE S 88$#17629'34" E a distance of 1320.57 feet along the North line of the said Southeast ¼ of the Southwest ¼ to a found Culak Surv-Kap at the Northeast corner of the said Southeast ¼ of the Southwest ¼, THENCE S 02$#17635'23" W a distance of 1325.04 feet along the East line of the said Southeast ¼ of the Southwest ¼ to a found P/K nail in rock at the South ¼ of said Section 16 on the centerline of the said Arrowhead Drive, THENCE N 88$#17621'36" W a distance of 2641.50 feet along the South line of said Section 16 and the centerline of said Arrowhead Drive to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 120.221 acres, more or less.
Description of Wellfield Sites
The real property and/or water rights described in the following deeds and other instruments of record:
1. Warranty Deed from Steve and Lorraine Franzoy to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated April 9, 2002, filed at Reception Number 2002-01826 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
2. General Warranty Deed from Donald R. and Lila M. Gardner to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated February 15, 2002 filed at Reception Number 2002-00897 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
3. Special Warranty Deed from Forrest H. Hill to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated October 17, 2001 filed in the State of New Mexico, County of Luna Reception Number 2001-05183
4. Warranty Deed from Hurt Cattle Company, Inc. to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated October 4, 2001 filed at Reception Number 2001-04909 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
5. General Warranty Deed from James W. and Juanita H. Lang to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 6, 2002 at Reception No. 2002-02852 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
6. Warranty Deed from Bert W. Timmons to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated January 23, 2002 filed at Reception No. 2002-00424 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
7. Special Warranty Deed from Ward T. Bell to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated March 12, 2002 field at Reception No. 2002-01440 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
8. Warranty Deed from Owen W. and Elizabeth A. Barker to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated October 5, 2001 filed at Reception No. 2001-04919 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
9. Special Warranty Deed from Shelby C. Phillips, III to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated October 30, 2001 filed in State of New Mexico, County of Luna Reception Number 2001-05532
10. Warranty Deed from Kent and Vivian Nicoll to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated January 7, 2002 filed at Reception No. 2002-00087 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
11. General Warranty Deed from J. Arza Nicoll to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated January 18, 2002 filed in the State of New Mexico, County of Luna Reception Number 2002-00319
12. Correction Warranty Deed from Paul I. and Brenda L. Offutt to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated May 31, 2002 filed at Reception Number 2002-02693 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
13. Special Warranty Deed from Olin J. and Ruth J. Offutt as Trustees of the Olin J. Offutt and Ruth Offutt Revocable Trust dated November 1, 1995 to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated November 16, 2001 filed at Reception No. 2002-00284 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
14. General Warranty Deed from Edmund E. and Alice Ogaz to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated April 24, 2002 filed at Reception No. 2002-02076 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
15. General Warranty Deed from Gilbert J. and Catherine C. Cramer Revocable Trust to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated January 17, 2002 filed at Reception No. 2002-00285 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
16. Special Warranty Deed from Ruben V. and Antonia P. Diaz to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated March 1, 2002 filed at Reception No. 2002-01169 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
17. General Warranty Deed from Louisa B. Valdespino to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated January 24, 2002 filed at Reception No. 2002-00413 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
18. Special Warranty Deed from Raymond and Carol L. Viramontes to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated November 15, 2001 filed at Reception Number 2001-05740 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
19. Special Warranty Deed from Bobby D. and Barbara June Waldrop to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated May 29, 2002 filed at Reception No. 2002-02658 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
20. Special Warranty Deed from Bobby D. and Barbara June Waldrop to Duke Energy, LLC dated October 29, 2001 filed in the State of New Mexico, County of Luna Reception Number 2001-05293
21. Change of Ownership of Water Right of No. M-1730 from Steve and Lorraine Franzoy to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06403 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
22. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-526-A from Forrest H. Hill to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06364 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
23. Water Rights Warranty Deed from Hurt Cattle Company, Inc. to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated July 12, 2002 filed at Reception number 2002-03584 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
24. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-448 et al, from Hurt Cattle Company to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06500 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
25. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-253 from James W. and Juanita H. Lang to Duke Energy Luna, LLC
26. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-545 from Bert W. Timmons to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06352 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
27. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-480 from Ward T. Bell and Linda M. Bell to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06501 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
28. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-460, et al, from Owen W. Barker and Elizabeth A. Barker to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06518 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
29. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-1715 from Shelby C. Phillips, III to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06505 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
30. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-456 from Shelby C. Phillips, III to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06504 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
31. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-455 from Shelby C. Phillips, III to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06503 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
32. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-454 from Shelby C. Phillips, III to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06502 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
33. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-531 from Joseph K. Nicoll to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06354 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
34. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-532 from Joseph K. Nicoll to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06353 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
35. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-527 from J. Arza Nicoll to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06404 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
36. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-483 from Olin J. Offutt to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06507 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
37. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-493 from Edmund E. Ogaz to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06499 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
38. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-526 from Gilbert T. Cramer to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06401 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
39. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-442 et al. from Ruben V. and Antonia P. Diaz to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06399 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
40. Change of Ownership of Water Rights No. M-533 (M-534) from Louisa B. Valdespino to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06355 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
41. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M1649 from Raymond and Carol L. Viramontes to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06517 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
42. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-478 from Raymond and Carol Viramontes to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06356 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
43. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-462-A from Bobby D. and Barbara J. Waldrop to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06506 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
44. Change of Ownership of Water Right No. M-480-A from Bobby D. and Barbara J. Waldrop to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06510 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
45. Letter dated September 24, 2002 from Modrall Sperling (Counsel for Duke Energy Luna, LLC) to the New Mexico State Engineer Office withdrawing Application to Change Place and Purpose of Use of Underground Water No. M-496
46. Change of Ownership of Water Rights from Donald L. and Lila M. Garner to Duke Energy Luna, LLC filed at Reception No. 2002-06402 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
47. The permits set forth in items 13-40 on Schedule 1B.
Schedule 1B
Permits
Unexpired Permits
1. Order of the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission dated October 27, 2000 accepting the Stipulation prepared by Duke Energy Luna, LLC, the Staff of the Utility Division of the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission, the New Mexico Industrial Energy Consumers, and Public Service Company of New Mexico, submitted to the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission on October 17, 2000
2. Final Order of the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission dated March 27, 2001 approving the siting and location of the Luna Energy Facility and associated 3,200 feet of 345 kV connecting transmission line
3. Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit No. PSD-NM-2450 issued December 29, 2000 from the State of New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau
4. Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit No. PSD-NM-2450-M1 issued June 11, 2002 from the State of New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau
5. Administrative Permit Revision to Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit No. PSD-NM-2450-M1 issued May 29, 2003 from the State of New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau
6. Acid Rain Permit No. P209A issued to Duke Energy Luna, LLC by the State of New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau dated January 24, 2001
7. Permit No. 4844 to Construct a Dam (for evaporation ponds) issued to Duke Energy Luna, LLC by the State of New Mexico Office of the State Engineer on January 23, 2002
8. Certificate of Construction and Operation and Proof of Completion (for OSE File No. 4844) issued February 12, 2004 by the State of New Mexico Office of the State Engineer (for the evaporation ponds)
9. Notification from US EPA dated September 15, 2004 issued to Duke Energy Luna, LLC acknowledging receipt of Notice of Intent for coverage under the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activity. Coverage under the permit for the plant site began on December 22, 2003.
10. Undated letter from the New Mexico Environment Department Hazardous Waste Bureau acknowledging receipt of RCRA Notification of Regulated Waste Activity and issuing EPA ID Number NMR000006338 to Duke Energy Luna, LLC
11. Discharge Plan Approval issued by the State of New Mexico Environment Department to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated February 22, 2001
12. Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation issued to Duke Energy Luna, LLC by the Federal Aviation Administration dated April 12, 2001 (Transmission towers or plant stacks in existing utility corridor)
13. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use of Well M-1730 dated September 23, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office. (Property conveyed by Franzoy)
14. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-526-A dated October 17, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Hill)
15. Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-526-S dated July 10, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Hill)
16. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of use of underground waters (File Nos. M-448, M-469, M-474) dated February 20, 2001 as amended by State Engineer Order and Revised Permit (File Nos. M-166 and M-167, and M-448, M-469 and M-474) dated April 3, 2001
(a) Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-469 dated October 15, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Hurt Cattle Co .)
(b) Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-469-S-2 dated October 15, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office ( Property conveyed by Hurt Cattle Co .)
17. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-253 dated May 29, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Lang)
18. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-545 dated May 29, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Timmons)
19. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-480 dated November 28, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Bell)
20. Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-460-S-2 dated April 8, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Barker)
21. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-1715 dated October 17, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Phillips)
22. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-456 dated October 17, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Phillips)
(a) Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-456 dated August 27, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office ( Property conveyed by Phillips .)
23. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-456-S dated May 28, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Phillips)
24. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-456-S-2 dated May 9, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Phillips)
25. Permit to Change Location of Well M-455-S-2 dated May 9, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Phillips)
26. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-455 dated October 17, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office
27. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-454 dated September 14, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Phillips)
(a) Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-454-S dated June 12, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office ( Property conveyed by Phillips )
28. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-531 dated October 17, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Kent Nicoll)
29. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-532 dated October 17, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Kent Nicoll)
(a) Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-532-S dated July 16, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Kent Nicoll )
30. Permit to Change Location of Well M-527 dated January 10, 2003 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Nicoll)
31. Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-527-S-2 January 10, 2003 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by J. Arza Nicoll)
32. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-483 dated October 17, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Offutt)
33. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-526 dated November 28, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Cramer)
(a) Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-526-S-4 dated June 12, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office ( Property conveyed by Cramer )
34. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-442 dated May 22, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Officer (Property conveyed by Diaz)
35. Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-442-S-5 dated October 11, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office ( Property conveyed by Diaz )
36. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-533 (M-534) dated April 10, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Valdespino)
(a) Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-533 dated June 12, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Valdespino .)
37. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-1649 dated September 14, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Viramontes)
38. Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-478-S dated July 10, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Viramontes)
39. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-462-A dated October 17, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Waldrop)
40. Permit to Change Place and Purpose of Use No. M-480-A dated October 17, 2001 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Waldrop)
(a) Permit to Change Location of Well No. M-480-A dated May 21, 2002 issued by the State of New Mexico State Engineer Office (Property conveyed by Waldrop )
41. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy issued to Duke Energy Luna, LLC by the City of Deming on September 16, 2004 for the Administration Building
42. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy issued to Duke Energy Luna, LLC by the City of Deming on September 16, 2004 for the Warehouse (Storage Building)
43. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right‑of‑Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved July 1, 2002 (Permit 2002-60)
44. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved July 1, 2002 (Permit 2002-61)
45. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved July 1, 2002 (Permit 2002-62)
46. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved July 1, 2002 (Permit 2002-63)
47. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved February 10, 2002 (Permit 2002-8)
48. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved February 10, 2002 (Permit 2002-9)
49. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved February 10, 2002 (Permit 2002-10)
50. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved February 10, 2002 (Permit 2002-11)
51. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved February 10, 2002 (Permit 2002-12)
52. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved February 10, 2002 (Permit 2002-14)
53. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved February 10, 2002 (Permit 2002-15)
54. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved February 10, 2002 (Permit 2002-16)
55. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved February 10, 2002 (Permit 2002-16A)
56. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved March 22, 2002 (Permit 2002-27)
57. Application for Permit to the Use of County Right-of-Way by Utilities and Other Persons submitted by Duke Energy Luna, LLC to the Luna County Road Department, approved March 22, 2002 (Permit 2002-28)
58. Application for Driveway Permits submitted by Duke/Fluor Daniel to the Luna County Road Department, approved July 31, 2001:
(a) Permanent Plant Entrance Road
(b) Permanent Gas Yard Entrance Road
(c) Temporary Construction Road #1
(d) Temporary Construction Road #2
(e) Temporary Construction Road #3
59. Utility Permit Approvals issued to Duke Energy Luna, LLC by the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department dated January 13, 2003:
(a) Permit No. 1-01-182, New Mexico Highway 418, Mile Marker 3.1
(b) Permit No. 1-01-183, U.S. Highway 180, Mile Marker 164.6
(c) Permit No. 1-01-185, Interstate 10, Mile Marker 79.46
(d) Permit No. 1-02-11, Loop 22 (U.S. Highways 70 and 80), Mile Marker 2.7
(e) Permit No. 1-02-21, Interstate 10, between Mile Markers 83.63 and 83.7
Expired Permits
60. Utility Permit Approvals issued to Duke Energy Luna, LLC by the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department:
(a) Permit No. 1-02-172, New Mexico Highway 418, Mile Marker 10.3, issued August 12, 2002
(b) Permit No. 1-02-176, Interstate 10, Mile Marker 78.69, issued August 15, 2002
61. NPDES Storm Water Construction Permit issued to Duke Energy Luna, LLC by the United States Environmental Protection Agency on September 12, 2001 for construction on plant site (expired upon issuance of new General Permit in July 2003. Coverage obtained under new General Permit, see Item 9 of Schedule 1B ).
62. NPDES Storm Water Construction Permit (Tracking No. NMR10C158) issued to Duke Energy Luna, LLC by the United States Environmental Protection Agency on December 5, 2001 for construction of water pipeline (terminated on September 2, 2002)
63. NPDES Storm Water Construction Permit (Tracking No. NMR10C396) issued to Framatome ANP DE&S by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for construction at the Deming wastewater treatment plant (terminated on November 26, 2002)
64. Hydrostatic Test Water Discharge Permit HI-079 issued to Duke Energy Luna, LLC by the New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department on August 14, 2002 (never activated)
Schedule 1C
Contracts
1. Long Term Service Agreement between General Electric International, Inc. and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 29, 2001
2. Global Amendment to Long Term Service Agreements between Duke Energy Global Markets, Inc. and General Electric International, Inc. dated December 9, 2002
3. Global Amendment #2 to Long Term Service Agreements between Duke Energy Luna, LLC et al and General Electric International, Inc. dated March 26, 2004
4. Wastewater Treatment and Emergency Water Cooperative Agreement between Duke Energy Luna, LLC and the City of Deming, New Mexico dated December 12, 2003
5. Electric Line Extension Agreement (Company-Built System) between Public Service Company of New Mexico and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated April 20, 2002
6. Electric Line Extension Revenue Credit Guarantee Agreement between Public Service Company of New Mexico and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated April 20, 2002
7. Operating and Maintenance Agreement between El Paso Natural Gas Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 25, 2002 (to extent still in effect)
8. Letter Agreement for the Construction, Operation and Ownership of the Deming Power Plant Delivery Point between El Paso Natural Gas Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 25, 2002 (to extent still in effect)
9. Letter Agreement for Provision of Onsite Metering Data Signals at the Deming Power Plant Delivery Point metering Facilities between El Paso Natural Gas Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 25, 2002 (to extent still in effect)
10. Assignment and Assumption of Certain Rights and Obligations from Duke Energy North America, LLC to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated August 10, 2001
11. Letter dated March 12, 2002 from Duke Energy North America, LLC to General Electric Company confirming the assignment of combustion and steam turbines to Duke Energy Luna, LLC
12. Purchase Order No. 70923-2-4001 dated October 1, 2001 issued by Duke Energy North America, LLC to General Electric Company for the purchase of two combustion turbines.
13. Purchase Order #70923-2-4002 dated October 1, 2001 issued by Duke Energy North America, LLC to General Electric Company for the purchase of one steam turbine.
14. Verbal agreement with Luna County to allow Duke Energy Luna, LLC to place a temporary sign along the County Road commonly known as Arrowhead Drive.
15. Purchase orders for leases of trailers and storage units.
16. Special Warranty Deed from City of Deming, New Mexico to Duke Energy Luna, LLC, dated as of the Closing Date, to be recorded on the Closing Date in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico.
17. Purchase Orders with Pro Force for security services dated December 18, 2002 and December 12, 2003, supplemented by letter dated December 17, 2002.
18. Electricity, water and other minor utility services contracts.
19. New Mexico One Call contract (notification to begin digging).
Schedule 1D
Facility Personal Property and Equipment
1. Two (2) General Electric model 7241 combustion turbine generators coupled with two (2) hydrogen cooled GE 7FH2 generators (CTGs), plus auxiliary equipment and systems. The combustion turbines are natural gas fuel only with a dry low NOx combustion system. The combustion turbine and auxiliaries are packaged for outdoor installation.
2. The Stellar Group combustion turbine inlet air chiller system.
3. Two (2) Erie Power Technology Inc (formerly Aalborg) heat recovery steam generators (HRSGs) and accessories for each combustion turbine. Each HRSG is a duct-fired, three-pressure, reheat, natural circulation type with horizontal gas flow and vertical tubes. Each HRSG has a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system (excluding catalyst).
4. Main steam system and STG by-pass steam system (for start-up, shut-down and upset conditions).
5. One (1) General Electric steam turbine generator (STG) with accessories and auxiliary systems. The steam turbine is a 3600 rpm, reheat, double flow, down exhaust type turbine with a hydrogen cooled GE 324 Generator.
6. Boiler feedwater pumps.
7. Condensate tank and pumps.
8. Components of a natural gas supply system consisting of lateral piping, metering station parts, pressure regulator, natural gas treatment and heating equipment, and supply piping to the combustion turbines, duct burners, and auxiliary users.
9. Components of a boiler feedwater treatment system.
10. Boiler blowdown equipment and tanks.
11. Chemical feed equipment for boiler feedwater.
12. Natural gas fired auxiliary boiler.
13. Red Mountain well field water system, including the water production wells located on the Wellfield Sites listed in Schedule 1A, storage tank, pumping station with pump house, and well field gathering and pumping equipment with DCS interface.
14. Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) system for treating City effluent, with lift stations and pumping equipment to move gray water to the Power Plant Site.
SBR system components may vary upon design completion. NOTE: Pursuant to the Wastewater Treatment and Emergency Water Cooperative Agreement between Duke Energy Luna, LLC and the City of Deming, New Mexico dated December 12, 2003, title to this system vests in the City of Deming upon completion of construction and acceptance by the City of Deming.
15. Generator electrical equipment including three (3) 345KV main step-up transformers and three (3) 18 kV generator circuit breakers and associated 18 kV isolated phase bus ducts.
16. On-site electrical interconnection equipment.
17. Electrical system including two (2) unit auxiliary transformers, 4,160V switchgear, 480V switchgear, 4,160V-480V station service transformers, 480V MCCs and 125V AC system.
18. 120V AC uninterruptible power supply (UPS) system.
19. 125 Volt DC power system.
20. One (1) emergency station power diesel generator.
21. Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) for each HRSG stack.
22. Plant control system equipment including distributed control system (DCS) equipment.
23. Plant/instrument air system equipment.
24. Plant utility systems equipment including components of service water system, wastewater system, water treatment system, and plant fire protection system.
25. Administration/Main Control Room Building
26. Warehouse/Maintenance Building
27. Fire/Pump House
28. Power Distribution Centers
29. Six (6) 2001 Kawasaki Mules, Model #KAF300-C5, VIN#s JK1AFBC161B533733, JK1AFBC171B529433, JK1AFBC101B533758, JK1AFBC101B533761, JK1AFBC161B533716, JK1AFBC171B533742
30. 2002 Ford Explorer VIN #1FMDU74W22UB33380
31. All other equipment, parts, systems, materials and other personal property not specified Items 1-30 which comprise part of or are otherwise located on, in or under the power plant, the Power Plant Site, the Wellfield Sites or the Easements.
Schedule 2A
Easements, Licenses and Rights-of-Way
The easements, licenses and rights-of-way (the "Easements") described in the following instruments:
1. Easement Agreement granted by Asarco Incorporated to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated April 5, 2002 filed at Reception No. 2002-06357 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
2. Grant of Easement from the City of Deming, New Mexico to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated December 9, 2002 filed at Reception Number 2003-03114 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
3. Easement Agreement between The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated August 31, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-04408 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
4. Letter Agreement for Longitudinal Easements between The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated August 28, 2001
5. Grant of Right of Way No. RW-27927 from State of New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated February 6, 2002 recorded at Reception No. 2002-06393 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
6. Option and Easement Agreement by and between Velva and Lawrence Hurt and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 19, 2001 filed at Reception number 2001-05089 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
7. Amendment to Option and Easement Agreement between Velva and Lawrence Hurt and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated December 27, 2001 recorded at Luna Reception No. 2002-01265 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
8. Easement Agreement between Shelby C. Phillips, III and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated May 14, 2002 recorded at Reception No. 2002-06358 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
9. Easement Agreement between Shelby C. Phillips, III and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated May 14, 2002 recorded at Reception No. 2002-06359 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
10. Easement Agreement between Shelby C. Phillips, III and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated May 14, 2002 recorded at Reception No. 2002-06360 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
11. Easement Agreement between Shelby C. Phillips, III and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 10, 2002 recorded at Reception No. 2002-06361 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
12. Easement Agreement between Shelby C. Phillips, III and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 10, 2002 recorded at Reception No. 2002-06362 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
13. Option and Easement Agreement between Duane Rigg and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 19, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05086 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
14. Amendment to Option and Easement Agreement between Duane Rigg and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated January 8, 2002 recorded at Reception No. 2002-01264 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
15. Option and Easement Agreement between Wanda Suratgar and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 19, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05085 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
16. Amendment to Option and Easement Agreement between Wanda Suratgar and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated January 29, 2002 recorded at Reception No. 2002-01263 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
17. Option and Easement Agreement between Vince Turley Walker and Vernon Linus Walker, Jr. and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 19, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05083 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
18. Amendment to Option and Easement Agreement between Vince Turley Walker and Vernon Linus Walker, Jr. and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated December 31, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2002-01267 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
19. Option and Easement Agreement between Walter Glen Nabours and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 8, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-02941 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
20. Amendment to Option and Easement Agreement between Paolo D'Andrea and Sylvia D'Andrea and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated February 14, 2002 recorded at Reception No. 2002-01612 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
21. Option and Easement Agreement between Nabours Family Revocable Trust, Kerty Lee Nabours and Velma Arlene Nabours, Trustees and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 8, 2001 recorded at Reception Number 2001-02939 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
22. Option and Easement Agreement between Walter Glen Nabours and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 8, 2001 recorded at Reception Number 2001-02940 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
23. Amendment to Option and Easement Agreement between Walter Glen Nabours and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated February 14, 2002 recorded at Reception Number 2002-01613 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
24. Option and Easement Agreement between Ruben Javier and Diana M. Diaz and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 19, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05724 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico.
25. Amendment to Option and Easement Agreement between Ruben Javier and Diana M. Diaz and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated January 12, 2002 recorded at Reception No. 2002-01266 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
26. Option and Easement Agreement between Lee Roy and Susana L. Hayes and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 25, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05202 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
27. Amendment to Option and Easement Agreement between Lee Roy and Susana L. Hayes and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated February 26, 2002 recorded at Reception No. 2002‑06363 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
28. Option and Easement Agreement between Lee and Margaret Baker Trust B., Lee R. Baker, Trustee and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 19, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-03203 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
29. Amendment to Option and Easement Agreement between Lee and Margaret Baker Trust B., Lee R. Baker, Trustee and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated October 13, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2002-06519 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
30. Pipe Line License granted by Southwestern Railroad, Inc. to Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated July 16, 2002
31. Pipeline License 01-21740 between The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated September 6, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2002-06514 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
32. Pipeline License 01-21741 between The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated September 6, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2002-06511 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
33. Pipeline License 01-21738 between The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated September 6, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2002-06515 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
34. Pipeline License 01-22634 between The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated April 12, 2002
35. Access Agreement between Rio Mimbres Corporation (Country Club) and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated February 26, 2002
36. Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement granted to Holloman Construction Company by Union Pacific Railroad Company December 20, 2001
37. Pipeline Crossing Agreement between Union Pacific Railroad Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated December 5, 2001
38. Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement granted to Holloman Construction Company by Union Pacific Railroad Company December 20, 2001
39. Pipeline Crossing Agreement between Union Pacific Railroad Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated December 5, 2001
40. Pipeline Crossing Agreement between Union Pacific Railroad Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 24, 2002
41. Option for Right-of-Way Agreement from Diaz Brothers Farms to Duke Energy North America, LLC, dated as of December 20, 2001, recorded in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico on August 1, 2002 under Reception No. 2002-03814, as assigned to Duke Energy Luna, LLC pursuant to that certain Assignment of Easements and Rights-of-Way (the " Master Assignment of Easements ") by and between Duke Energy North America, LLC and Duke Energy Luna, LLC, dated as of July 8, 2004, recorded in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico on September 9, 2004 under Reception No. 2004-05152
42. Option for Right-of-Way Agreement from William M. Snyder to Duke Energy North America, LLC, dated as of October 20, 2001, recorded in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico on August 1, 2002 under Reception No. 2002-03822, as assigned to Duke Energy Luna, LLC pursuant to the Master Assignment of Easements
43. Option for Right-of-Way Agreement from Walter Glenn Nabours to Duke Energy North America, LLC, dated as of October 4, 2001, recorded in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico on August 1, 2002 under Reception No. 2002-03821, as assigned to Duke Energy Luna, LLC pursuant to the Master Assignment of Easements
44. Option for Right-of-Way Agreement from Paolo D'Andrea and Sylvia D'Andrea to Duke Energy North America, LLC, dated as of November 1, 2001, recorded in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico on August 1, 2002 under Reception No. 2002-03820, as assigned to Duke Energy Luna, LLC pursuant to the Master Assignment of Easements
45. Option for Right-of-Way Agreement from Joe Allen Deckert, Ruth Ann Eaves as Executrix for the Estate of Margery Ann Darling to Duke Energy North America, LLC, dated as of October 15, 2001, recorded in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico on August 1, 2002 under Reception No. 2002-03823, as assigned to Duke Energy Luna, LLC pursuant to the Master Assignment of Easements
46. Option for Right-of-Way Agreement from The Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints to Duke Energy North America, LLC, dated as of December 12, 2001, recorded in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico on August 1, 2002 under Reception No. 2002-03816, as assigned to Duke Energy Luna, LLC pursuant to the Master Assignment of Easements
47. Option for Right-of-Way Agreement from Emily Holtkamp McElroy and H.N. McElroy to Duke Energy North America, LLC, dated as of October 17, 2001, recorded in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico on August 1, 2002 under Reception No. 2002-03815, as assigned to Duke Energy Luna, LLC pursuant to the Master Assignment of Easements
48. Option for Right-of-Way Agreement from The Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints to Duke Energy North America, LLC, dated as of December 12, 2001, recorded in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico on August 1, 2002 under Reception No. 2002-03817, as assigned to Duke Energy Luna, LLC pursuant to the Master Assignment of Easements
49. Option for Right-of-Way Agreement from Wamel Lands, Inc. to Duke Energy North America, LLC, dated as of November 26, 2001, recorded in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico on August 1, 2002 under Reception No. 2002-03819, as assigned to Duke Energy Luna, LLC pursuant to the Master Assignment of Easements
50. Valve and Road Easement from The Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints to Duke Energy North America, LLC, dated as of December 12, 2001, recorded in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico on August 1, 2002 under Reception No. 2002-03818, as assigned to Duke Energy Luna, LLC pursuant to the Master Assignment of Easements
51. Pipeline Crossing Agreement between Union Pacific Railroad Company and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 24, 2002 to construct a natural gas pipe line crossing at Mile Post 1204.26 on the Lordsburg Subdivision
52. Easement dated July 9, 2002 from The City of Deming, New Mexico to Duke Energy Luna, LLC recorded at Reception No. 2004-06142 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
53. Option and Easement Agreement between Iris E. Wray, aka Iris E. Schroeder and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated November 12, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05572 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
54. Option and Easement Agreement between Iris E. Wray, aka Iris E. Schroeder and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated November 12, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05571 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
55. Option and Easement Agreement between Velva W. Hurt and Lawrence B. Hurt and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated October 22, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05188 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
56. Option and Easement Agreement between Velva W. Hurt and Lawrence B. Hurt and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated October 22, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05187 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
57. Option and Easement Agreement between Hurt Cattle Co., Inc. and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated October 22, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05186 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
58. Option and Easement Agreement between Hurt Cattle Co., Inc. and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated October 22, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05185 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
59. Option and Easement Agreement between Hurt Cattle Co., Inc. and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated October 22, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05184 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
60. Option and Easement Agreement between Olin J. Offutt and Ruth Offutt Revocable Trust and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 19, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05090 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
61. Option and Easement Agreement between Raymond A. Rackley and Mamie O. Rackley and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 19, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05088 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
62. Easement Agreement between Richard Waldrop and Roberta Waldrop and Duke Energy Luna, LLC dated June 19, 2001 recorded at Reception No. 2001-05084 in the Real Property Records of Luna County, New Mexico
Schedule 2B
Excluded Contracts
1. Interconnection Agreement between Duke Energy Luna, LLC and El Paso Electric Company, Public Service Company of New Mexico and Texas-New Mexico Power Company dated December 21, 2001 to be effective December 26, 2001
2. First Amendment dated April 30, 2003 to the Interconnection Agreement between Duke Energy Luna, LLC and El Paso Electric Company, Public Service Company of New Mexico and Texas‑New Mexico Power Company dated December 21, 2001
3. Maintenance Agreement between Duke Energy Luna, LLC and James Hamilton Construction Co., dated December 20, 2002
EXHIBIT 10.137
[*] Indicates that the confidential portion has been omitted from this filed exhibit and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission
ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR
THE LUNA ENERGY FACILITY
BY AND AMONG
PHELPS DODGE ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
PNMR DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,
TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY,
AND
FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC.
DATED AS OF FEBRUARY 24, 2005
ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION
AGREEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page |
DEFINITIONS |
1 |
|
1.1 |
"Affiliate" |
1 |
1.2 |
"Applicable Codes and Standards" |
1 |
1.3 |
"Applicable Law" |
1 |
1.4 |
"Business Day" |
1 |
1.5 |
"Change Order" |
2 |
1.6 |
"Contamination" |
2 |
1.7 |
"Contract Completion Date" |
2 |
1.8 |
"Contract Documents" |
2 |
1.9 |
"Contract Sum" |
2 |
1.10 |
"Contractor's Project Director" or "Project Director" |
2 |
1.11 |
"D/FD Engineering Services" |
2 |
1.12 |
"Disclosing Party" |
2 |
1.13 |
"Engineering Services" |
2 |
1.14 |
"Environmental Laws" |
2 |
1.15 |
"Existing Work" |
2 |
1.16 |
"Facility" |
3 |
1.17 |
"Facility CPM Schedule" |
3 |
1.18 |
"Fee" |
3 |
1.19 |
"Final Completion" |
3 |
1.20 |
"Fully Dispatchable Facility" |
3 |
1.21 |
"Good Engineering and Construction Practices" or "GECP" |
3 |
1.22 |
"Hazardous Materials" |
3 |
1.23 |
"Key Personnel" |
3 |
1.24 |
"Major Subcontracts" |
3 |
1.25 |
"Major Subcontractors" |
3 |
1.26 |
"Mechanical Completion" |
3 |
1.27 |
"Notice to Proceed" |
3 |
1.28 |
"Owner Event of Default" |
3 |
1.29 |
"Owner-Furnished Property" |
4 |
-i-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page |
||
1.30 |
"Owner", "Owner Party" or "Owner Parties" |
4 |
1.31 |
"Owner's Project Manager" |
4 |
1.32 |
"Overrun" |
4 |
1.33 |
"Performance Security" |
4 |
1.34 |
"Performance Tests" |
4 |
1.35 |
"Plant Site" |
4 |
1.36 |
"Punch List" |
4 |
1.37 |
"Rate Schedule" |
4 |
1.38 |
"Receiving Party" |
4 |
1.39 |
"Reimbursable Cost" or "Reimbursable Costs" |
4 |
1.40 |
"Services" |
4 |
1.41 |
"Site" |
4 |
1.42 |
"Subcontractors" |
4 |
1.43 |
"Substantial Completion" |
4 |
1.44 |
"Target Cash Flow Budget" |
5 |
1.45 |
"Target Performance Criteria" |
5 |
1.46 |
"Target Price" |
5 |
1.47 |
"True-Up Date" |
5 |
1.48 |
"Uncontrollable Forces" |
5 |
1.49 |
"Underrun" |
5 |
1.50 |
"Warranty Period" |
5 |
1.51 |
"Work" |
5 |
1.52 |
"Work Progress Schedule" |
5 |
ARTICLE 2 |
THE WORK AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES |
5 |
2.1 |
The Work. |
5 |
2.2 |
Specific Obligations for the Work. |
6 |
2.3 |
Spare Parts. |
7 |
2.4 |
Contractor's Tools and Equipment. |
7 |
2.5 |
Employment of Personnel |
7 |
2.6 |
Clean-up and Non-Interference. |
8 |
-ii-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page |
||
2.7 |
Safety and Security. |
8 |
2.8 |
Emergencies. |
8 |
2.9 |
Approvals, Certificates, Permits and Licenses. |
8 |
2.10 |
Contractor Taxes. |
9 |
2.11 |
Hazardous Materials. |
9 |
2.12 |
Progress Meeting and Reports. |
9 |
2.13 |
Care, Custody and Control/Risk of Loss. |
10 |
2.14 |
[Intentionally Omitted] |
10 |
2.15 |
Interpretation. |
10 |
2.16 |
Training and Operational Supervision. |
11 |
2.17 |
Interconnections. |
11 |
2.18 |
Responsibility for Subcontractors. |
11 |
2.19 |
Assurances Regarding Payments. |
12 |
2.20 |
Office Space. |
12 |
2.21 |
Key Personnel. |
12 |
2.22 |
Co-operation and Coordination. |
12 |
2.23 |
Start-Up, Commissioning and Testing Gas and Raw Water. |
13 |
2.24 |
Owner Obligations |
13 |
2.25 |
Existing Work. |
15 |
2.26 |
Commercial Activities. |
15 |
ARTICLE 3 |
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE |
15 |
3.1 |
Commencement of the Work and Contract Completion Date. |
15 |
3.2 |
Work Progress Schedule and Facility CPM Schedule |
15 |
3.3 |
Delays and Time Extensions. |
16 |
ARTICLE 4 |
COMPENSATION |
16 |
4.1 |
Compensation. |
16 |
4.2 |
Reimbursable Costs. |
16 |
4.3 |
Fee. |
20 |
4.4 |
Target Price, Underrun and Overrun. |
20 |
4.5 |
Non-Reimbursable Items. |
21 |
-iii-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page |
||
4.6 |
Monthly Billing |
22 |
4.7 |
Contents of Progress Invoices. |
22 |
4.8 |
Final Payment; Liens. |
23 |
4.9 |
Records; Audit. |
23 |
4.10 |
No Duplication. |
24 |
4.11 |
Effect of Payment. |
24 |
4.12 |
Security of Performance. |
24 |
4.13 |
Wire Transfer Information. |
24 |
ARTICLE 5 |
CHANGES IN THE WORK |
24 |
5.1 |
Change Order. |
24 |
5.2 |
Individuals Authorized to Make Changes. |
24 |
5.3 |
Change Orders |
24 |
5.4 |
If No Agreement. |
26 |
ARTICLE 6 |
INSPECTION AND WARRANTY |
26 |
6.1 |
Warranty. |
26 |
6.2 |
Engineering and Design Warranty. |
27 |
6.3 |
Inspection and Testing |
28 |
6.4 |
Correction of Defects. |
29 |
6.5 |
Limitations. |
29 |
6.6 |
Title. |
29 |
ARTICLE 7 |
REPRESENTATIVES AND NOTICES |
30 |
7.1 |
Owner's Project Manager. |
30 |
7.2 |
Contractor's Project Director. |
31 |
7.3 |
Notices. |
31 |
7.4 |
Changes. |
31 |
7.5 |
Ordinary Course. |
32 |
ARTICLE 8 |
PRIOR WORK AND WORK SITE |
32 |
8.1 |
Prior Work and Site Investigation. |
32 |
8.2 |
Lines and Grades. |
32 |
8.3 |
Specifications and Drawings. |
32 |
8.4 |
Use of Premises. |
33 |
-iv-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page |
||
8.5 |
Cleaning Up. |
33 |
8.6 |
Underground Facilities. |
33 |
8.7 |
Other Contracts. |
33 |
ARTICLE 9 |
[INTENTIONALLY OMITTED] |
34 |
ARTICLE 10 |
COMPLETION OF THE WORK |
34 |
10.1 |
Mechanical Completion |
34 |
10.2 |
Performance Testing |
35 |
10.3 |
Substantial Completion |
35 |
10.4 |
Punch List. |
36 |
10.5 |
Final Completion |
37 |
ARTICLE 11 |
DEFAULT AND TERMINATION |
37 |
11.1 |
Contractor Default. |
37 |
11.2 |
Right to Terminate for Cause. |
38 |
11.3 |
Termination by Owner for Cause. |
38 |
11.4 |
Termination by Owner for Convenience. |
39 |
11.5 |
Stopping Work. |
39 |
11.6 |
Suspension of the Work. |
40 |
11.7 |
Owner Default. |
40 |
11.8 |
Delivery of Documents. |
40 |
ARTICLE 12 |
DISPUTE RESOLUTION |
41 |
12.1 |
Dispute Resolution. |
41 |
12.2 |
Waiver of Jury Trial. |
42 |
ARTICLE 13 |
INDEMNITY AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY |
42 |
13.1 |
General Liability; Indemnification. |
42 |
13.2 |
Liability for Owner Property. |
42 |
13.3 |
Trespass. |
42 |
13.4 |
Intellectual Property Rights Infringement Indemnity. |
42 |
13.5 |
Owner's Use of Drawings and Specifications. |
43 |
13.6 |
Consequential Damages. |
43 |
13.7 |
Limitation of Liability. |
44 |
-v-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page |
||
ARTICLE 14 |
DRUG, ALCOHOL, SAFETY AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS |
44 |
14.1 |
Drug and Alcohol Policy. |
44 |
14.2 |
Safety Materials. |
44 |
14.3 |
Safety Precautions. |
45 |
14.4 |
Hazardous Materials |
45 |
ARTICLE 15 |
INSURANCE |
47 |
15.1 |
Contractor's Insurance. |
47 |
15.2 |
Coverage. |
48 |
15.3 |
Subcontractors. |
49 |
15.4 |
Owner's Insurance. |
49 |
ARTICLE 16 |
OWNERSHIP OF PLANS AND CONFIDENTIALITY |
50 |
16.1 |
Title to plans and specifications. |
50 |
16.2 |
Confidentiality. |
51 |
ARTICLE 17 |
UNCONTROLLABLE FORCES |
51 |
17.1 |
Uncontrollable Forces. |
51 |
ARTICLE 18 |
OTHER PROVISIONS |
51 |
18.1 |
EEO Clauses and Executive Orders. |
51 |
18.2 |
Assignment. |
52 |
18.3 |
Independent Contractor. |
52 |
18.4 |
No Waiver. |
52 |
18.5 |
Gratuities. |
52 |
18.6 |
Severability. |
53 |
18.7 |
Governing Law. |
53 |
18.8 |
Fair Labor Standards Act. |
53 |
18.9 |
New Mexico Preference. |
53 |
18.10 |
Counterparts. |
53 |
18.11 |
Entire Agreement. |
53 |
18.12 |
Agreement Authors. |
54 |
18.13 |
Survival of Obligations. |
54 |
18.14 |
No Third Party Beneficiaries. |
54 |
-vi-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page |
||
18.15 |
Liability of Owner Parties. |
55 |
-vii-
LIST OF EXHIBITS
A. Scope of Work
B. Work Progress Schedule
C. Rate Schedule
D. Form of Change Order
E. (1) Form of Partial Lien Waivers and Release,
(2) Form of Final Lien Waiver and Release
F. (1) Form of Substantial Completion Certificate
(2) Form of Final Completion Certificate
G. Target Performance Criteria
H. List of Major Subcontracts and Subcontractors
I. Permits
J. Owner's Drug and Alcohol Policy
K. Procedure for Assessment of Existing Work
L. Owner-Furnished Property
M. Plant Site and Site Descriptions
N. Target Cash Flow Budget
O. Form of Performance Security
P. Form of Monthly Progress Report
Q. Key Personnel
R. Target Price Summary
ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
THIS ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") effective the 24th day of February 2005 ("Effective Date"), is by and among FLUOR ENTERPRISES , INC. a California corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor") and PHELPS DODGE ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, PNMR DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION , a New Mexico corporation, and TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY , an Arizona corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner"). Contractor and Owner may be referred to collectively as the "Parties" or individually as a "Party".
RECITALS
WHEREAS , Contractor has represented to Owner that it is specifically qualified to perform engineering, procurement, construction, testing, start-up and commissioning services of the nature contemplated by this Agreement; and
WHEREAS , Owner desires to engage Contractor to perform engineering, procurement, construction, testing, start-up, and commissioning services related to the partially-constructed Luna Energy Facility, a nominal 570 MW gas-fired combined cycle power plant to be completed in Deming, New Mexico, and Contractor desires to perform such services for Owner;
NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual terms, covenants and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Contractor and Owner agree as follows:
In addition to other defined terms contained in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meaning specified below in this Article .
1.1 "Affiliate" . of a Party means any other entity directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by or under direct or indirect common control with such Party. For the purposes of this definition, control means the power to direct the management or policies directly or indirectly whether through the ownership of voting securities or otherwise.
1.2 " Applicable Codes and Standards " . shall mean the codes, standards or requirements set forth in Exhibit A applicable to the Work.
1.3 "Applicable Law" . shall mean any law, including but not limited to Environmental Laws, statute, code, order, decree, injunction, license, permit, consent, approval, agreement or regulation of any federal, state, tribal or local government, department, court, office, agency, board or commission having jurisdiction over a Party or any portion of the Work
1.4 "Business Day" . means a day other than Saturday, Sunday, or a day on which banks are authorized to close in New Mexico, Texas or Arizona.
1
1.5 "Change Order" . means a written instrument, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit D , signed by Owner and Contractor in accordance with Article 5.
1.6 "Contamination" . means any Hazardous Material present at the Site or which has been brought to the Site by a party other than Contractor or its Subcontractors.
1.7 "Contract Completion Date" . means May 1, 2006, as may be adjusted pursuant to the Agreement.
1.8 "Contract Documents " . means this Agreement plus all attachments, exhibits, specifications, schedules, and drawings and any Change Orders or amendments thereto.
1.9 "Contract Sum" . is the sum through the applicable True-Up Date of the actual amounts for (a) Reimbursable Costs paid by Owner that are chargeable against the Target Price plus (b) other amounts incurred or paid by Owner in accordance with this Agreement that are chargeable against the Target Price.
1.10 "Contractor's Project Director" or "Project Director" . shall be the person identified in Article 7.2 .
1.11 "D/FD Engineering Services" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 6.2.
1.12 "Disclosing Party" . shall mean the Party disclosing information in Article 16.2 .
1.13 "Engineering Services" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 6.2 .
1.14 "Environmental Laws" . mean all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and ordinances governing, regulating or relating to public health, pollution, or the protection of the environment, including, but not limited to, the laws and regulations promulgated pursuant to: the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq., as amended, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., as amended, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq., as amended, the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., as amended, the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., as amended, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq., as amended, the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300f et seq., as amended, the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., as amended, and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11001 et seq., as amended , the New Mexico Water Quality Act, §74-6-1 et seq., as amended, the New Mexico Air Quality Act, § 74-2-1 et seq., as amended, the New Mexico Hazardous Waste Act, §74-4-1, et seq., as amended, the New Mexico Solid Waste Act, §74-9-1, et seq., as amended, the New Mexico Ground Water Protection Act, § 74-6B-1, et seq., as amended, and the New Mexico Hazardous Chemicals Information Act, §74-4D-1, et seq., as amended, together with all applicable similar and related federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and ordinances, as may be amended from time to time.
1.15 "Existing Work " . shall mean those portions of the Facility constructed and existing as of the Effective Date together with Owner-Furnished Property.
2
1.16 " Facility" . means the combined cycle power plant known as Luna Energy Facility, in Deming, New Mexico, including without limitation all equipment, materials, fuel and water supply systems, discharge equipment and all other ancillary equipment located at the Site.
1.17 "Facility CPM Schedule" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 3.2.2 .
1.18 "Fee" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 4.3 .
1.19 "Final Completion" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 10.5.1.
1.20 "Fully Dispatchable Facility" . shall mean a reliable power generation facility capable of starting and operating in accordance with manufacturers' recommendations, Applicable Law and generally accepted operating practices without excessive trips or significant periods of downtime and as further described in Exhibit A .
1.21 " Good Engineering and Construction Practices" or " GECP " . shall mean that degree of skill and judgment and the utilization of practices, methods, and techniques and standards that (a) are generally expected of skilled and experienced engineering and construction firms in the electric power industry in the United States of America and commonly used by such firms to design, engineer, construct, commission, and test power and related facilities similar to the Facility and (b) conform in all material respects to the recommendations and guidelines of the suppliers and manufacturers of the equipment comprising the Facility, taking into account such equipment's size, service and type, so that such equipment may be operated in compliance with any applicable warranty, in compliance with Applicable Laws, and in a manner that consistent with preserving the reliability and availability of the Facility under the operating conditions reasonably expected at the Site.
1.22 "Hazardous Materials" . mean any hazardous, toxic, or polluting substance, material or waste as defined or regulated under any Applicable Law and other substances, materials or wastes that, even if not so defined or regulated, reasonably could be anticipated to pose a hazard to human health and safety or to the environment.
1.23 "Key Personnel" . shall mean those Contractor positions identified in Article 2.21 .
1.24 "Major Subcontracts" . means all of the contracts between Contractor and Major Subcontractors.
1.25 "Major Subcontractors" . means those Subcontracts set forth in Exhibit H and any other Subcontractor with a scope of work, whether through one contract or several contracts, having consideration due to such Subcontractor equal to or greater than $1,000,000.
1.26 "Mechanical Completion" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 10.1 .
1.27 "Notice to Proceed" . means that notice issued by Owner in accordance with Article 3.1 .
1.28 "Owner Event of Default" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 11.7 .
3
1.29 "Owner-Furnished Property " . means that certain property, real and personal, owned, leased or otherwise controlled by the Owner associated with the Existing Work and the Facility and furnished to Contractor pursuant to Article 2.24.2 , including, but not limited to, those items described in Exhibit L, which are intended to be all of the materials and equipment necessary for the Facility except as identified in Attachment 1 to Exhibit L.
1.30 " Owner", " Owner Party" or "Owner Parties" . means , PNMR Development and Management Corporation, Tucson Electric Power Company and Phelps Dodge Energy Services, LLC, individually or collectively, as the context requires, including their respective successors and permitted assigns .
1.31 "Owner's Project Manager " . means the person identified pursuant to Article 7.1 .
1.32 "Overrun" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 4.4.2.
1.33 "Performance Security" . means a guaranty from Fluor Corporation in the form set forth in Exhibit O and provided by Contractor to Owner pursuant to Article 4.12 .
1.34 "Performance Tests " . means those tests performed in accordance with Exhibit A.
1.35 " Plant Site " . means the location where the generating station is situated as more particularly described on Exhibit M .
1.36 "Punch List" . means a listing of all incomplete or deficient Work, identified by Owner or identified by Contractor as Punch List items.
1.37 "Rate Schedule" . means the schedule set forth in Exhibit C .
1.38 "Receiving Party" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 16.2 .
1.39 "Reimbursable Cost" or "Reimbursable Costs" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 4.2 .
1.40 "Services" . shall mean the engineering, procurement, construction, testing, start-up and commissioning services to be performed by Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents, all as more particularly described in Exhibit A .
1.41 "Site" . means the Plant Site, all easements and rights-of-way, and all other real property associated with the Facility, which is more particularly described in Exhibit M .
1.42 "Subcontractors" . means any person with whom Contractor has entered into any subcontract, purchase order or other agreement for such person to perform any part of the Work or to provide any materials, equipment or supplies, including any person at any tier with whom any Subcontractor has further subcontracted any part of the Work.
1.43 "Substantial Completion" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 10.3.1 .
4
1.44 "Target Cash Flow Budget " . means the line item budget, by month, through Final Completion of the projected Reimbursable Costs included in the Target Price and the Fee paid to Contractor, which initial budget is attached as Exhibit N .
1.45 "Target Performance Criteria" . means those Facility characteristics described in Exhibit G .
1.46 "Target Price" . means [*], which includes the Reimbursable Costs required to complete the performance of the Work, including allowances of [*] for the water treatment facility in Deming, [*] for the gas pipeline, [*] for the well water and gathering systems, and [*] for the completion of the Chiller Installation, through the date twelve (12) months following the date of Substantial Completion, as adjusted by a Change Order. These allowances are exclusive of gross receipts tax, escalation and G&A. The Target Price does not include the Fee will shall be paid to Contractor, or gross receipts taxes which shall be reimbursed to Contractor.
1.47 "True-Up Date" . shall mean, as applicable, the date of Final Completion and the date twelve (12) months following the date of Substantial Completion.
1.48 "Uncontrollable Forces" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 17.1 .
1.49 "Underrun" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 4.4.1 .
1.50 "Warranty Period" . shall have the meaning set forth in Article 6.1.1 .
1.51 "Work" . means the Services and all things to be designed, engineered, manufactured, furnished, executed, installed, tested, completed, made good or otherwise provided by Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents, all as more particularly described by the descriptions contained in, Exhibit A. Work excludes Existing Work, but shall include modifications, deletions, replacements and additions to Existing Work performed by Contractor pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
1.52 "Work Progress Schedule" . means the timeline for completion of each principal category of the Work for achieving Substantial Completion of the Facility by the Contract Completion Date. The Work Progress Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
ARTICLE 2
THE WORK AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES
2.1 The Work. . Contractor agrees to perform the Work in accordance with the Scope of Work set forth in Exhibit A. Contractor shall fully perform the Work in accordance with GECP, all Applicable Laws, all Applicable Codes and Standards, and all other terms and provisions of this Agreement, with the explicit understanding that the Work will result in a fully integrated and functional combined cycle facility. Contractor shall design and construct the Facility so that it is capable of achieving the Target Performance Criteria; provided, however, such Target Performance Criteria are an estimate of the performance criteria to be achieved and Contractor does not guarantee that the Target Performance Criteria will be achieved. Contractor acknowledges that pursuant to the foregoing obligation it shall carry out all of the supply and
5
services required or that can be inferred reasonably from this Agreement even though not expressly mentioned herein so that the Work shall include any work that is necessary to satisfy the requirements of the Contract Documents, and to the extent not specifically addressed by the Contract Documents, in accordance with GECP.
2.2 Specific Obligations for the Work. . Without limiting the generality of Article 2.1, or the requirements of any other provision of this Agreement (including, but not limited to, Exhibit A ), Contractor shall:
2.2.1 Protect from damage and properly store all equipment procured by Contractor or accepted by Contractor at the Site (including Owner-Furnished Property and any spare parts);
2.2.2 Provide construction, construction management (including the furnishing of all field supplies, tools, construction equipment, and all Site supervision and craft labor), engineering, procurement, inspection and quality control services required under this Agreement;
2.2.3 Coordinate all delivery schedules and performance obligations of all Subcontractors and other Owner vendors so that performance under such subcontracts and purchase orders, as the case may be, is enforced in accordance with the terms thereof and as required by this Agreement;
2.2.4 Perform shop and other inspections of the Work of Subcontractors as reasonably required to determine conformance with all of the requirements of this Agreement;
2.2.5 Comply with all Applicable Laws, including but not limited to state and federal occupational, safety and health laws and regulations;
2.2.6 Supply all initial lubrication fills for the Facility;
2.2.7 Perform all quality control and quality assurance activities (including witnessing tests) to confirm that the Work complies with this Agreement.
2.2.8 Perform the Work in accordance with the Work Progress Schedule;
2.2.9 Perform commissioning and start-up of the Facility, including the development of a detailed commissioning plan, that includes a commissioning matrix, the commissioning procedures, turnover packages, manpower requirements, technical direction and Owner interfaces; and
2.2.10 Provide a training program for the operations and maintenance personnel, which includes detailed training plan and applicable operating and maintenance procedures for the Facility.
2.3 Spare Parts. . Contractor shall provide Owner with a recommended spare parts list for the Facility within thirty (30) days following the Effective Date. The spare parts list shall identify
6
those spare parts that are recommended for operations and those that are recommended for testing, start-up and commissioning. With respect to the latter, the spare parts list shall include the dates by which the recommended spare parts need to be purchased and available at the Site to support the Work Progress Schedule. Although Owner shall be responsible for the costs to purchase, secure, and store any spare parts that Owner elects to acquire, Contractor shall purchase, on a timely basis (it being understood that Owner shall designate the spare parts to be purchased on a timely basis consistent with the Work Progress Schedule), such spare parts on behalf of Owner as Owner's agent and shall store and secure such spare parts until care, custody and control of the Facility is transferred to Owner pursuant to Article 2.13 . Subject to Owner's consent, which shall not be withheld unreasonably, Contractor may use any spare parts maintained on the Site by Owner. The replacement cost of Owner supplied spare parts used by Contractor, unless replaced by an equipment supplier as a warranty replacement, shall be included in the Contract Sum and chargeable against the Target Price.
2.4 Contractor's Tools and Equipment. . Contractor shall furnish all tools and equipment necessary and appropriate for the timely and safe performance and completion of the Work.
2.5.1 Contractor shall not employ, or permit any Subcontractor to employ, in connection with its performance under this Agreement any unfit person or anyone not skilled in the Work assigned to such person. Contractor agrees to promptly remove (or to require any Subcontractor to remove) from its services in connection with the Work any employee who is unfit or unskilled. If Owner has any objection to the fitness or qualifications of any person retained by Contractor to perform the Work, Owner shall so notify Contractor in writing. Upon receipt of such notice, Contractor shall investigate Owner's concerns and take appropriate action, which may include the reassignment or removal of such person. Notwithstanding any other provisions in this Agreement to the contrary, Contractor shall provide workers skilled and specialized in the Work to which they are assigned.
2.5.2 Contractor, at Owner's request, shall perform security and background checks, as well as drug and alcohol tests, for the purpose of determining a worker's suitability for the assignment.
2.5.3 Owner reserves all rights to deny placement of any of Contractor's workers on Owner premises, property, equipment or projects at its sole discretion. Such denial of placement of subject workers shall be conveyed subject to the provisions of Article 7.3 "Notices" and/or consistent with the normal custom between Owner and Contractor.
2.5.4 No Party shall, during the term of this Agreement or for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days thereafter, directly or indirectly for itself or on behalf of, or in conjunction with, any other person, partnership, corporation, business or organization, actively solicit the employment of an employee of the other with whom that Party or its personnel have had contact during the course of this
7
Agreement, unless that Party has obtained the written consent of the other Party to such hiring and that Party pays to the other a fee to be mutually agreed upon.
2.6 Clean-up and Non-Interference. . Contractor shall at all times keep the Site free from waste materials or rubbish caused by its activities. As soon as practicable after the completion of all Punch List items, Contractor shall remove all of its equipment and materials not constituting part of the Facility and remove all waste material and rubbish generated by Contractor or that Contractor has brought to the Site, in connection with Contractor's performance of the Work, from the Site to a permitted disposal facility, and restore the Site in accordance with all Applicable Laws and Applicable Codes and Standards and this Agreement. During the period from Substantial Completion until completion of the Punch List, Contractor shall perform its Work so that the performance of the Work does not unreasonably interfere with the operation of the Facility.
2.7 Safety and Security. . Contractor recognizes and agrees that safety is of paramount importance in the performance of the Work and that Contractor is solely responsible for performing the Work in a safe manner. Contractor agrees to perform the Work, and Contractor shall require all Subcontractors to perform their portion of the Work, in accordance with the safety and health rules and standards of Applicable Law and the safety program developed by Contractor and submitted to Owner. Contractor further agrees to provide necessary training to its employees and Subcontractors to inform them of the foregoing safety and health rules and standards. Should Owner at any time observe Contractor, or any of its Subcontractors, performing the Work in an unsafe manner, or in a manner that may, if continued, become unsafe, then Owner shall have the right (but not the obligation) to require Contractor to stop the Work affected by the unsafe practice until such time as the manner of performing the Work has been rendered safe. Contractor shall be responsible for the supervision of the Facility as set forth in Article 2.13 . The Parties recognize that the Facility has already been fenced. The Scope of Work in Exhibit A addresses responsibility for security and guarding of the Facility. Nothing in this Article 2.7 shall affect Contractor's status as an independent contractor.
2.8 Emergencies. . In the event of any emergency endangering life or property, Contractor shall take such action as may be reasonable and necessary to prevent, avoid or mitigate injury, damage, or loss and shall, as soon as possible, report any such incidents, including Contractor's response thereto, to Owner. If Contractor has not taken reasonable precautions for the safety of the public or the protection of the Work, and such failure creates an emergency requiring immediate action, then Owner, with or without advance notice to Contractor may, but shall be under no obligation to, provide reasonable protection as required to address such emergency; provided, however, that Owner shall in any event notify Contractor of any actions taken by Owner within ten (10) Business Days of taking such action. All reasonable direct costs so incurred by Owner as a result of any emergency caused by Contractor shall be included in the Contract Sum and chargeable against the Target Price.
2.9 Approvals, Certificates, Permits and Licenses. . Contractor shall obtain all approvals, certificates, permits and licenses required to be in Contractor's name to perform the Work and as set forth in Exhibit I . Contractor shall promptly, within such time period as may be agreed upon by the Parties, provide Owner with all assistance that Owner may reasonably require to secure
8
those approvals, certificates, permits and licenses required to be in the name of Owner as set forth in Exhibit I.
2.10 Contractor Taxes. . Contractor shall pay all taxes and contributions for unemployment insurance, old age retirement benefits, pensions, annuities, and similar benefits, as well as taxes measured by or imposed on the income of Contractor, which may now or hereafter be imposed on Contractor by Applicable Law or collective bargaining agreements with respect to persons employed by Contractor for performance of the Work. Contractor shall be liable for and shall pay and shall indemnify, defend, and hold Owner harmless from, all such taxes and contributions, including any interest accrued and penalties imposed thereon (plus reasonable attorney fees), except for those taxes that are reimbursable by Owner in accordance with the immediately succeeding sentence. On all invoices, Contractor shall separately show all New Mexico gross receipts, compensating, sales, excises, assessments, charges, and other similar taxes which are imposed on the Services or the Work, or any part thereof, and such taxes shall be reimbursable by Owner to Contractor. Charges not subject to New Mexico gross receipts tax shall be separately stated, and no New Mexico or other jurisdiction's gross receipts, compensating, use or sales taxes shall be charged to Owner thereon. Contractor shall utilize appropriate New Mexico nontaxable transaction certificates (a form of which shall be provided to Contractor by Owner) or similar certificates from other states, where applicable, to minimize such gross receipts, compensating, sales, and other similar taxes.
2.11 Hazardous Materials. . Contractor shall design, construct, pre-commission, test and start-up the Facility and otherwise perform the Work in compliance with the requirements of all Applicable Laws. If, during the course of the performance of the Work, Contractor or any Subcontractor discovers, or reasonably believes it has discovered in, on or under any part of the Site, any Hazardous Materials (other than Hazardous Materials that Contractor or a Subcontractor has brought onto the Site, produced, created or used), Contractor shall proceed in accordance with Article 14.4.3.
2.12 Progress Meeting and Reports. . Contractor shall hold a monthly progress meeting at the Site, or at an alternate location mutually agreeable to Owner and Contractor, for the purpose of reviewing the monthly progress report for the previous month with Owner. Contractor shall provide Owner with monthly progress reports and the following other information relating to the progress of the Work as may be reasonably requested by Owner:
2.12.1 Minutes for all status and other Facility meetings within four (4) Business Days following such meeting;
2.12.2 Weekly progress reports of construction activities;
2.12.3 Safety incident reports within three (3) Business Days of the occurrence of any such incident (preliminary written notice is to be provided to Owner within 24 hours of a safety incident, provided, however, that verbal notice of critical or fatal injuries shall be provided to Owner within 3 hours);
2.12.4 Monthly progress reports, in a form set forth in Exhibit P , no later than ten (10) days after the end of each month, which shall cover activities up to the end of
9
the previous month and which shall include five (5) paper copies of such reports that shall be distributed as directed by Owner and which shall include Contractor's representation that the Work through the date of the progress report has, unless otherwise stated by Contractor, been performed in accordance with this Agreement; and
2.12.5 Updates every month to the Facility CPM Schedule pursuant to Article 3.2.
2.13 Care, Custody and Control/Risk of Loss. . Upon the Effective Date, Contractor shall have the full responsibility for care, custody and control and risk of loss of the Facility (including Existing Work) until the earlier of Substantial Completion or the date of termination of this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of Article 11 . Risk of loss and care, custody, and control of the Facility shall transfer from Contractor to Owner upon the earlier of Substantial Completion or the date of termination of this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of Article 11 . In connection with Contractor's risk of loss obligation, Contractor shall be responsible for and obligated to replace, repair, or reconstruct, and to furnish any material, equipment, or supplies furnished by Contractor or Owner-Furnished Property, which are lost, damaged, or destroyed prior to transfer of care, custody, and control of the Facility or the affected portion thereof to Owner, to the extent Contractor receives proceeds of insurance maintained for the Facility pursuant to Article 15 or Contractor otherwise receives reimbursement of its costs pursuant to the terms of this Article 2.13 . Except as otherwise provided herein in this Article 2.13 , Contractor's responsibility and liability for risk of loss and any damage to the Facility shall be limited to the scope and limits of such insurance. Prior to the transfer of care, custody and control of the Facility to Owner, (a) all non-covered losses and deductibles for covered losses which, in either case, are not attributable to the fault of Contractor or its Subcontractors shall be paid by Owner as a Reimbursable Cost that is not included in the Contract Sum and that is not chargeable against the Target Price and (b) all non-covered losses and deductibles for covered losses which, in either case, are attributable to the fault of Contractor or its Subcontractors shall be paid by Owner as a Reimbursable Cost that is included in the Contract Sum and that is chargeable against the Target Price. Owner assumes all responsibility for such loss, damage, or destruction after transfer of care, custody, and control of the Facility from Contractor to Owner.
2.15 Interpretation. . In the event of any inconsistencies between Applicable Laws and the Contract Documents, Contractor shall comply with Applicable Laws in the manner set forth in this Article 2.15 . Where a conflict exists between parts of the Contract Documents, or between the Contract Documents and Applicable Laws, or among Applicable Laws, the more stringent or higher quality requirements shall control unless otherwise directed by Owner. If Contractor finds a conflict, error, omission, inconsistency or discrepancy in the Contract Documents, then Contractor shall call it to Owner's attention in writing before proceeding with the portion of the Work affected thereby.
2.16 Training and Operational Supervision . . Contractor shall establish and implement a training program for Owner's operations and maintenance personnel. Prior to Substantial Completion, Contractor shall supervise Owner's operations and maintenance personnel.
10
2.17 Interconnections . . Contractor shall construct the interconnections between the Facility and the interconnection facilities of (a) the electric transmission provider, (b) the gas transporter, (c) the water supplier and (d) the water discharge system, all as set forth in Exhibit A .
2.18 Responsibility for Subcontractors.
2.18.1 Contractor may subcontract portions of the Work to any person without further approval by Owner except for any Major Subcontracts, which are subject to Owner's reasonable review and approval. Contractor may have portions of the Work performed by its Affiliates or their employees, in which event Contractor shall be responsible for such Work and Owner will look solely to Contractor as if the Work were performed by Contractor. Owner understands that Contractor's subsidiary organizations, Fluor Global Sourcing & Supply Inc. and/or Global Sourcing & Supply International LLC (either or both referred to as "GS&S"), have negotiated proprietary and confidential "Supplier Relationship Agreements" (whether entered into by GS&S or any of their respective Affiliates, a "Contractor SRA") with various strategic suppliers of certain materials, equipment, and Work. Such Contractor SRAs contain favorable pricing and terms and conditions. If either Contractor or Owner procures materials, equipment or services using Contractor SRAs, then it is agreed that the quoted prices and terms from such Contractor SRAs are firm and not subject to audit. Notwithstanding any provision herein or in any related agreements to the contrary, neither Contractor nor GS&S shall be subject to audit or adjustment for any volume, cash, trade discounts, refunds, rebates, freight allowances, equalizations, credits, commissions or the like under any Contractor SRAs or other agreements either may have with any vendor outside of this Agreement and unrelated to the Work, and any such items shall accrue exclusively to the benefit of Contractor or GS&S. Contractor and GS&S retain the right to communicate with the vendor to notify the vendor of Contractor's rights relating to SRAs so that the vendor does not have a basis to object to continue to pay SRA volume incentives to GS&S notwithstanding the provisions in the purchase order to the contrary, if any.
2.18.2 The issuance of subcontracts shall not relieve Contractor of any of its obligations under the Contract Documents, including, among other things, the obligation to properly supervise and coordinate the work of Subcontractors. Work performed by Contractor's Affiliates shall be treated as if the Contractor had performed the Work.
2.18.3 Owner's approval of any proposed Major Subcontract shall not constitute an approval of any portion of the Work or a waiver of any of Owner's rights hereunder or reduce Contractor's responsibilities hereunder. Contractor shall provide to Owner, on request, information (other than financial information) concerning the status of the negotiations with, the performance under and any disputes under each Major Subcontract, including information concerning specifications and cancellation terms. Contractor agrees that it will not (a) terminate any Major Subcontract, (b) amend or waive any material provision of
11
a Major Subcontract, or (c) settle any dispute without Owner's consent under a Major Subcontract that affects Owner's warranty rights.
2.18.4 Notwithstanding any agreement with any Subcontractor(s), Contractor shall be solely responsible for the Work. Contractor has complete and sole responsibility as a principal for its agents and all others it hires to perform or assist in performing the Work. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Owner shall not be deemed to have any contractual obligation to any Subcontractor and nothing contained in any subcontract shall create a contractual relationship between any Subcontractor and Owner.
2.18.5 Contractor shall provide to Owner a summary of bids received for Subcontracts for Owner's review in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 2.3 of Exhibit A .
2.18.6 Nothing in this Article 2.18 limits Owner's audit rights to review any purchase orders issued in connection with the Work in accordance with Article 4.9 .
2.19 Assurances Regarding Payments . . Upon request from time to time, Contractor shall provide to Owner such information as Owner may reasonably request as to the status of payments from Owner to Contractor and from Contractor to Subcontractors.
2.20 Office Space. . Contractor shall provide Owner with access to Owner's existing offices at the Site for use by representatives of Owner.
2.21 Key Personnel. . Contractor shall appoint a Project Director (as further described in Article 7.2 ), a deputy project director, a quality assurance/quality control director, a site manager, an engineering manager, a chief field engineer, a construction manager, a project safety manager, a start-up manager, the mechanical Subcontractor site manager, and the electrical Subcontractor site manager (together the "Key Personnel"); as set forth in Exhibit Q . The Project Director shall have full responsibility and authority for the Work on behalf of Contractor and shall act as Owner's primary point of contact with Contractor with respect to prosecution of the Work. Contractor shall not change a Key Personnel position or the person appointed to such position without the prior written consent of Owner (with the exception of the Project Director position, which Owner agrees will be replaced with the deputy project director when Contractor deems appropriate but in no event shall Contractor continue to employ both a Project Director and an assistant project director for longer than two (2) months following the Effective Date unless otherwise agreed by the Parties), which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
2.22 Co-operation and Coordination . . Upon prior reasonable notice by Owner, Contractor shall co-operate with, and grant reasonable access to the Site to, any person whom Owner appoints in writing to provide services with respect to the Facility, including, without limitation any person, whether employed by Owner or not, carrying out interface work in relation to the gas supply system, the electric interconnection facilities and the water supply and discharge system, provided that Owner obtains agreement from such persons to comply with Contractor's health and safety requirements, Applicable Law and Good Engineering and Construction Practices.
12
2.23 Start-Up, Commissioning and Testing Gas and Raw Water . . Contractor shall only use the natural gas supplied by Owner for the purposes of starting-up, commissioning and initial operation of the Facility and the performance of the Performance Tests. Contractor shall follow the scheduling and nomination procedures for natural gas to be mutually developed by the Parties prior to the commencement of the Performance Tests on a basis consistent with the requirements of Owner's fuel transportation agreement(s). Contractor also shall follow the scheduling and nomination procedures for water to be mutually developed by the Parties prior to the commencement of the Performance Tests on a basis consistent with the requirements of Owner's water supply contract(s). The Parties acknowledge that they anticipate that the scheduling and nomination procedures for natural gas and water will include prior-day notice.
2.24.1 Site. Owner shall make the Site available to Contractor as of the Effective Date. Owner shall provide suitable access thereto and an adequate area or areas adjoining such site for Contractor's office, warehouse, craft change rooms, shop buildings, welding facilities, materials storage and lay down area, employee parking, and furnish necessary construction utilities.
2.24.2 Owner-Furnished Property. No later than the Effective Date, Owner shall make available to Contractor the Owner-Furnished Property.
2.24.3 Fuel and Water Utilities. Owner shall provide at the relevant interface point, natural gas and all utilities, including water and electricity, as set forth in Exhibit A , to enable construction, testing, start-up, commissioning, initial operation of the Facility, and all Performance Tests in accordance with the Work Progress Schedule.
2.24.4 Operations Personnel. Owner shall provide appropriately qualified, competent, and, where necessary, licensed operators for training when required by Contractor and to support commissioning, initial operation of the Facility and all Performance Tests.
2.24.5 Start-Up Power. Owner shall provide electric energy for the energization, commissioning, operation, and testing of the Facility; provided, however, Contractor shall use reasonable efforts to minimize the demand charges that Owner will incur for such supply of electric energy.
2.24.6 Scheduling and Delivery of Output. Owner shall arrange for the delivery of all electric energy generated by the Facility. Contractor shall comply with the scheduling and nomination procedures for delivery of electric energy to be mutually developed by the Parties prior to the date for such delivery set out in the Work Progress Schedule on a basis consistent with the requirements of Owner's applicable interconnection agreement and transmission service agreement. The Parties acknowledge that they anticipate that the scheduling and nomination procedures for delivery of electric energy will include prior-day notice. Upon receipt of notice from Contractor in accordance with such
13
scheduling and nomination procedures, Owner shall coordinate delivery of electric energy from the Facility to conduct start-up, operation, or testing; provided that Owner shall only be required to provide for such delivery in accordance with the Work Progress Schedule.
2.24.7 Licenses and Permits. Owner shall obtain any approvals, certificates, permits and other licenses required to be in Owner's name that are required for the Facility and as set forth in Exhibit I , except where such permits or licenses are specifically identified to be the responsibility of Contractor as part of the Work as set forth in Exhibit I .
2.24.8 Taxes. Owner shall pay all property taxes assessed against the Facilities.
2.24.9 Existing Drawings and Specifications. Owner shall provide Contractor with access to and the right to use all drawings and specifications, if any, prepared for the Facility (including the gas pipeline, water treatment and water well systems) for Owner, or for Owner's predecessor in interest, that are in Owner's possession, prior to the Effective Date that are necessary for Contractor's performance of the Work. If Contractor identifies any additional drawings and specifications necessary for the performance of the Work that existed, but were not in Owner's possession, as of the Effective Date, Owner shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain such drawings and specifications and the right to access and use, once obtained. To the extent Owner is unable to obtain such drawings and specifications in a reasonable period of time, Contractor shall be entitled to a Change Order in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 for any resultant delay or additional costs for the creation of such drawings and specifications.
2.24.10 Subsurface Conditions. Contractor shall have access to any soil data in Owner's possession as of the Effective Date which is related to the Facility (including the gas pipeline, water treatment and water well systems) and necessary for Contactor's performance of the Work, including the Fugro South, Inc., Geotechnical Investigation, Luna Energy Facility, Prepared for Duke/Fluor Daniel, dated October 20, 2000 and the Terracon, Soils Investigation Report for the Proposed Waste Water Treatment Plant Addition, Project #68025032, dated June 26, 2002. If Contractor identifies any additional soil data necessary for the performance of the Work that existed, but was not in Owner's possession, as of the Effective Date, Owner shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain such soil data. To the extent Owner is unable to obtain such soil data in a reasonable period of time, Contractor shall be entitled to a Change Order in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 for any resultant delay or additional costs for the creation of such soil data.
2.24.11 Notice to Suppliers of Existing Equipment. Immediately following the Effective Date, except with respect to the services addressed in Article 2.24.12 , Owner shall notify major equipment suppliers (and others as required) with respect to existing equipment at the Site that Contractor is designated as
14
Owner's authorized representative in connection with applicable purchase orders.
2.24.12 Coordination with General Electric. Owner will contract directly with General Electric (GE) for technical assistance and technical direction with respect to GE-supplied equipment. Owner will coordinate between GE and Contractor for such technical assistance and technical direction.
2.24.13 Parent Company Guarantee. In the event that Tucson Electric Power elects to assign this Agreement to another party, at least one of the Owners will provide Contractor a Parent Company Guaranty acceptable to the Parties.
2.25 Existing Work. . Contractor shall perform an assessment of the Existing Work in accordance with the scope and procedures set forth in Exhibit K. If at any time Contractor identifies any modifications, changes, replacements or additions thereto to the Existing Work, Contractor shall notify Owner.
2.26 Commercial Activities . . Contractor shall not, and shall ensure that any Subcontractors do not, engage in any commercial activity or permit any third parties to establish commercial activities on the Site that are unrelated to the performance of the Work. Contractor shall not allow its employees to engage in any commercial activity on the Site other than the performance of the Work.
ARTICLE 3
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
3.1 Commencement of the Work and Contract Completion Date. . Contractor shall commence the Work under this Agreement upon the receipt of a notice from Owner to Contractor requesting that Contractor commence the Work (the "Notice to Proceed"), which Notice to Proceed shall be deemed to be issued on the Effective Date. From and after the Effective Date, Contractor shall diligently prosecute the Work continuously and with due diligence in accordance with the Work Progress Schedule set forth in Exhibit B . It is estimated, but not guaranteed, that Substantial Completion will be achieved by the Contract Completion Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no damages or other liability shall be imposed solely for Contractor's failure to achieve Substantial Completion on or before the Contract Completion Date.
3.2 Work Progress Schedule and Facility CPM Schedule .
3.2.1 Contractor shall perform the Work in accordance with the Work Progress Schedule set forth in Exhibit B , as may be adjusted from time to time in accordance with this Agreement.
3.2.2 Within ten (10) days after the execution of this Agreement, Contractor shall submit for Owner's review and approval a critical path method schedule (the "Facility CPM Schedule"), which shall use Primavera software, conform to the Work Progress Schedule, and set forth the timing of all elements of the Work
15
and the interrelationship of such elements. The Facility CPM Schedule shall describe comprehensively, and in a form and to the level of detail agreed to by Owner, the activities required to complete the Work. The Facility CPM Schedule shall include all significant activities divided into specific, identifiable tasks according to their importance, together with a critical path schedule. The Facility CPM Schedule shall highlight selected activities by time period and type of activity showing the sequence in which Contractor proposes to perform the Work and the date by which Contractor reasonably requires that Owner shall have fulfilled its obligations under this Agreement and Contractor intends to rely upon the Facility CPM Schedule in connection therewith. Contractor shall not change the dates set forth in the Facility CPM Schedule for Owner's obligations unless approved by Owner.
3.2.3 The Facility CPM Schedule shall be periodically (but at least monthly) updated and delivered to Owner with the monthly progress report. Contractor shall provide an explanation of any expected delay in achieving a level one milestone date and Contractor's plan to remedy such delay and any additional costs associated with such plan. If at any time the Facility CPM Schedule shows that Substantial Completion will not be achieved by the Contract Completion Date, Contractor shall advise Owner and submit to Owner a recovery plan (including the costs of implementing such plan) for Owner's review and approval. Upon receipt of Owner's approval, Contractor shall implement such plan as approved as a Reimbursable Cost that is included in the Contract Sum, and chargeable against the Target Price if the cause of delay is attributable to Contractor.
3.3 Delays and Time Extensions. . Without limiting the obligations of Contractor set forth in Article 3.2.3 , Contractor shall promptly notify Owner in writing of any actual or anticipated event that is delaying or could delay completion of the Facility in accordance with the Work Progress Schedule. Contractor shall indicate the expected duration and anticipated effect of the delay, and the action being taken to correct the problem and make up for lost time. Contractor shall be entitled to an adjustment to the Contract Completion Date and the Target Price, as appropriate, pursuant to the provisions of Article 5 for any delay that may occur, so long as such delay is not caused by Contractor or any Subcontractor or is not otherwise attributable to Contractor's failure to perform in accordance with this Agreement. Contractor shall take all steps reasonably available to Contractor to mitigate any impacts of the delay on the Work Progress Schedule or Reimbursable Costs, as the case may be. All time extensions shall be incorporated into the Contract Documents through the execution of a Change Order.
4.1 Compensation. . Owner shall reimburse Contractor for its costs and pay Contractor a Fee in accordance with this Article 4 .
4.2 Reimbursable Costs . . Contractor's costs related to the Work shall be invoiced as the total of and in accordance with the following applicable categories:
16
4.2.1 Home Office Employees and Related Costs
4.2.1.1 Employees' Compensation. For straight time and overtime hours, compensation in accordance with Exhibit C and subsequent revisions, for such time as is devoted to the Work by home office employees, including employees of certain affiliates of Contractor, whether such Work is performed in the office or in the field. In addition, members of Contractor's corporate staff who devote direct time to the performance of the Work shall be reimbursed as set forth above if approved by Owner. Members of Contractor's and its affiliates' management team, in lieu of the foregoing commercial basis, will be reimbursed in accordance with the Project Management Principals Rate Schedule set forth in Exhibit C ;
4.2.1.2 Agency personnel. The invoiced cost of agency personnel;
4.2.1.3 Indirect Expense. An amount equal to [*] per hour for home office support services and Houston engineering services (collectively and initially estimated to be [*] hours), to recover a portion of the costs referred to in Article 4.5 below;
4.2.1.4 Miscellaneous Expenses. Miscellaneous expenses, including, but not limited to, custom printed forms, special book bindings, drafting room and office materials and supplies, freight, express mail, duties, and excise taxes, and any other costs incurred in connection with the Work will be invoiced at cost; and
4.2.1.5 Project Support. Miscellaneous administrative and project support services charged in accordance with Contractor's current practices, including but not limited to charges for personnel, safety services, communications services, document storage, client office space, printing and reproduction, automation tools and computer services, which shall be reimbursed in accordance with the Rate Schedule set forth in Exhibit C .
4.2.2 Field Employees and Related Costs
4.2.2.1 Salaried Field Employees. For straight time and overtime hours, compensation in accordance with Exhibit C and subsequent revisions, for such time as is devoted to the Work, including travel time, of Contractor's salaried field employees, including employees of certain affiliates of Contractor, whether such Work is performed in the office or in the field. In addition, members of Contractor's corporate staff who devote direct time to the performance of the Work shall be reimbursed as set forth above if approved by Owner;
4.2.2.2 Agency Personnel. The invoiced cost of agency personnel;
17
4.2.2.3 Hourly Field Employees - Wages, Benefits and Training Contribution. The wages of hourly field employees and the costs of subsistence, travel time and expenses;
4.2.2.4 Hourly Field Employees - Taxes and Insurances. An amount equal to all payroll taxes, e.g ., FICA, FUI and SUI, levied or assessed by any governmental body, which are measured by the compensation payable pursuant to subparagraph 4.2.2.3 above, plus premiums for workers' compensation and risk management programs;
4.2.2.5 Major Construction Tools and Equipment. For the use of all major construction tools and equipment in accordance with Exhibit C ;
4.2.2.6 Transportation Expenses. The costs of transporting and handling major construction tools and equipment, in accordance with Exhibit C . The cost of transportation, to and from the Site, of Contractor-supplied small tools as set forth in Exhibit C shall be reimbursed at invoiced cost to Contractor;
4.2.2.7 General Expenses. The cost for providing temporary construction facilities at the Site; the cost of operating and maintaining a job office and warehouse and storage facilities, including the cost of the office furnishings, equipment, and supplies; expendable construction items and supplies in accordance with Exhibit C ; communication and utilities expenses and all other field office services and expenses; the cost of maintaining and performing running repairs to construction tools and equipment; and all other direct costs; and
4.2.2.8 Project Support. Miscellaneous administrative and project support services charged in accordance with Contractor's current practices, including but not limited to charges for personnel, safety services, communications services, document storage, client office space, printing and reproduction, automation tools and computer services which shall be reimbursed in accordance with the Rate Schedule set forth in Exhibit C .
4.2.3 Adjustments
4.2.3.1 The allowances in Article 4.2 shall be increased or reduced when Contractor benefit programs or benefit costs change, or when statutory or insurance requirements or costs change.
4.2.4 Other Costs
4.2.4.1 Materials and Equipment. The cost of materials, machinery, equipment, supplies, parts, and miscellaneous services procured for the Work excluding Contractor's major construction tools and equipment which are provided for in Article 4.2.2.6 hereof;
18
4.2.4.2 Transportation of Materials and Equipment. The cost of all transportation expenses to the Site on materials, machinery, tools and equipment, including the cost of loading, hauling, unloading, and insurance;
4.2.4.3 Travel and Relocation Expenses. The cost of all travel and relocation and other related expenses in accordance with Contractor's established policies. If Owner's or Contractor's employees travel by Contractor's aircraft (owned or leased), Contractor will be reimbursed at commercial airline rates for class or fare authorized for equivalent Contractor employees under Contractor's established policies. For any part of the route for which there is no regularly scheduled commercial air service, reimbursement shall be at the rates established by Contractor from time to time.;
4.2.4.4 Taxes and Bonds. The cost of any duties, taxes, licenses or bonds arising directly out of or that are applicable to the Work, other than taxes that are non-reimbursable pursuant to Articles 2.10 and 4.5 ;
4.2.4.5 Permits and Inspections. The cost of permits required of Contractor by any governmental body in connection with the construction services herein provided for, and the cost of inspections required by law or ordinance of any governmental body;
4.2.4.6 Subcontracts. The cost of any subcontracts;
4.2.4.7 Insurance. The cost of all project specific insurance premiums maintained by Contractor to protect Owner and/or Contractor as set forth in Article 15 and the costs of all insurance deductibles and non-covered losses;
4.2.4.8 Audits, Monitoring and Accounting. The cost of periodic project audits and similar programs monitoring the financial or other aspects of the project, and any project-specific accounting functions, including, but not limited to, preparation of property accounting records;
4.2.4.9 Litigation and Related Costs. The costs of attorney's fees, costs, settlements, and/or judgments incurred in connection with any labor or commercial litigation, claims or disputes arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement other than litigation, claims or disputes (i) solely between Owner and Contractor or (ii) arising in connection with Article 13 ; and
19
4.3 Fee. . Contractor shall be entitled to a fee (the "Fee") based on the date Substantial Completion is achieved.
4.3.1 If Substantial Completion is achieved on or before April 1, 2006, the Fee shall be [*].
4.3.2 If Substantial Completion is achieved after April 1, 2006 but on or before May 1, 2006, the Fee shall be [*] plus 1/30th of the difference between [*] and [*] for each day prior to May 1, 2006 that Substantial Completion is achieved ( e.g. , if Substantial Completion is achieved on April 2, 2006, the Fee would be [*] plus 29/30ths of [*] and if Substantial Completion is achieved on April 30, 2006, the Fee would be [*] plus 1/30th of [*]).
4.3.3 If Substantial Completion is achieved after May 1, 2006 but on or before June 1, 2006, the Fee shall be [*] plus 1/31st of the difference between [*] and [*] for each day prior to June 1, 2006 that Substantial Completion is achieved ( e.g. , if Substantial Completion is achieved on May 2, 2006, the Fee would be [*] plus 30/31sts of [*] and if Substantial Completion is achieved on May 31, 2006, the Fee would be [*] plus 1/31st of [*]).
4.3.4 If Substantial Completion is achieved after June 1, the Fee shall be [*].
4.3.5 Owner shall pay [*] of the Fee in equal monthly installments beginning with the month in which the Effective Date occurs through May 1, 2006. Owner shall pay the balance of any Fee due to Contractor ten (10) Business Days after the date Substantial Completion is achieved.
4.4 Target Price, Underrun and Overrun. . The Parties contemplate that the Work can be completed for the Target Price, which amount is not guaranteed. To provide Contractor with an incentive to so complete the Work for an amount no greater than the Target Price, the Contract Sum shall be compared to the Target Price at each True-Up Date and the Parties shall share responsibility for any resulting Underrun or Overrun in accordance with the provisions of this Article 4.4 .
4.4.1 Underrun. If the Contract Sum is less than the Target Price at a True-Up Date, then the Parties recognize that there is an Underrun (the amount of the Underrun is the Target Price minus the Contract Sum at such True-Up Date). The amount of the Underrun minus [*] shall be shared [*] to Owner and [*] to Contractor.
4.4.2 Overrun. If the Contract Sum is more than the Target Price at a True-Up Date, then the Parties recognize that there is an Overrun (the amount of the Overrun is the Contract Sum minus the Target Price). The amount of the Overrun in excess of [*] shall be charged [*] to Owner and [*] to Contractor.
4.4.3 Billing and Payment of Underruns. If there is an amount due to Contractor for an Underrun after the initial True-Up Date, Contractor shall invoice such amount to Owner and Owner shall pay such amount within twenty (20)
20
calendar days after the receipt of such invoice. If the amount due to Contractor for an Underrun at the final True-Up Date is greater than the amount previously paid by Owner with respect to the initial True-Up Date, Contractor shall invoice such additional amount to Owner and Owner shall pay such additional amount within twenty (20) calendar days after the receipt of such invoice. If the amount due to Contractor for an Underrun at the final True-Up Date is less than the amount previously paid by Owner with respect to the initial True-Up Date, Contractor shall repay Owner for the excess paid by Owner within twenty (20) calendar days after the final True-Up Date.
4.4.4 Billing and Payment of Overruns. If at any time during the performance of the Work prior to the initial True-Up Date, the Contract Sum exceeds the Target Price by more than [*], Contractor shall thereafter invoice Owner for only [*] of its Reimbursable Costs in its progress invoices delivered pursuant to Article 4.6. If there is an amount due from Contractor for an Overrun after the initial True-Up Date, Contractor shall pay such amount , adjusted to account for any reduced billings from Contractor pursuant to the first sentence of this Article 4.4.4, within twenty (20) calendar days after the True-Up Date. If the amount due from Contractor for an Overrun at the final True-Up Date is greater than the amount previously paid by Contractor with respect to the initial True-Up Date, Contractor shall pay such additional amount within twenty (20) calendar days after such True-Up Date.
4.4.5 Limitation on Contractor Responsibility for Overruns. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Article 4.4 , in no event shall Contractor be obligated to pay Owner for Overruns or have withheld from payments of Reimbursable Costs to Contractor on account of Overruns more than the sum of [*] plus [*] of the positive difference, if any, between the Fee paid to Contractor pursuant to Article 4.3 and [*].
4.4.6 Exclusive Remedy. Contractor's obligation to share responsibility for any Overrun as set forth in this Article 4.4 shall be Contractor's only obligation and liability and Owner's exclusive remedy for a Contract Sum that exceeds the Target Price.
4.5 Non-Reimbursable Items. . The following costs and expenses are not reimbursable to Contractor as a separate amount, as these costs are included in the hourly rates and the general and administrative percentage allowed as a Reimbursable Cost under Article 4.2:
(a) Contractor's Executive Officers, including the Chairman of the Board, President, Vice Presidents (except as provided for herein), Secretary, Treasurer, and Controller;
(b) Contractor's Sales, Public Relations, Medical, and Advertising personnel, when not directly engaged in the Work, as well as office maintenance personnel, consisting of telephone and teletype operators, guards, receptionists, mail room, janitorial and maintenance employees;
21
(c) Home office general expenses, consisting of depreciation, rent, and maintenance of home office facilities, furniture, office equipment, light, heat, cafeteria service and parking space;
(d) General overhead expenses, consisting of the development of engineering and construction standards and programs not specific to the project, entertainment and charity contributions;
(e) Property taxes on Contractor's real and personal property at the home office and taxes assessed against net income; and
4.6.1 On or about the 10th day of each month Contractor shall furnish Owner with a progress invoice for its estimate of the Reimbursable Costs to be incurred that month adjusted for any difference between the estimate for the prior month and the actual Reimbursable Costs incurred in the prior month, which shall be prepared as set forth in Article 4.7 hereof. Owner shall pay the amount set forth in the progress invoice within five (5) Business Days of the receipt by Owner of the progress invoice.
4.6.2 In the event Owner disputes any invoiced item, Owner shall give Contractor written notice of such disputed item within ten (10) days after receipt of the invoice. Owner nevertheless shall pay Contractor the amount set forth in the progress invoice in accordance with the provisions hereof and such dispute shall be resolved pursuant to Article 12 , Dispute Resolution; provided, however, that the Parties shall use their reasonable efforts to resolve any such dispute within sixty (60) days of the date of Owner's payment of the disputed amount. If such dispute is resolved in favor of Owner, Contractor shall repay Owner, with interest, on that portion of the disputed amount for Owner, calculated at the prime rate as reported in The Wall Street Journal plus [*]. The payment of interest shall not excuse or cure any default or delay in payment. To the extent Contractor fails to deliver the monthly progress report and the updated Facility CPM Schedule as required in Articles 2.12.4 and 3.2.3, respectively, Owner's obligation to make payment shall be extended on a day for day basis.
4.7 Contents of Progress Invoices. . Each progress invoice shall set forth the Reimbursable Costs estimated for the prior month, the actual Reimbursable Costs incurred during the prior month, and the Reimbursable Costs estimated to be incurred during the current month, including the current portion of the Fee. Each progress invoice shall be supported by:
(1) one copy of all supporting documentation for Reimbursable Costs under Article 4.2 and an itemized listing of Subcontractor invoices, expense reports and other reimbursable expenses;
(2) a certification as to the accuracy of the billing;
22
(3) a certification that each Subcontractor or vendor listed was actually paid in the amount set forth in the prior progress invoice;
(4) with respect to amounts paid to Subcontractors in excess of $250,000.00, partial lien waivers on the form attached hereto as Exhibit E-1 ; and
(5) the variance between the aggregate Reimbursable Costs incurred and expected to be incurred through the current month from the Target Cash Flow Budget, as adjusted by any Change Order, together with an explanation of any variance of greater than five percent (5%).
4.8 Final Payment; Liens . . Prior to Final Completion and delivery of any final payment invoice under the Contract Documents, Contractor shall complete all Work, including Punch List Work, and shall execute and deliver to Owner final waivers of liens executed by the Contractor and all Major Subcontractors (in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E-2 ) and Contractor's certification that, to the best of Contractor's knowledge after reasonable inquiry, (1) all indebtedness, including liens, with respect to or in connection with the Work has been paid and (2) all claims for payment for labor and materials for which Contractor is responsible in connection with the construction of the Facility have been paid or satisfied. Owner shall pay the final payment invoice within ten (10) calendar days after Final Completion, provided that Owner receives all of the following: (a) Contractor's certification that all Work, including Punch List Work, has been completed, (b) Contractor's duly certified voucher for payment, and (c) the executed waivers of liens referred to in this paragraph. Contractor shall indemnify, defend and save Owner harmless from all laborer's, materialmen's, and mechanic's liens arising out of the Work and from all reasonable attorney fees relating thereto incurred by Owner so long as Owner has paid Contractor all amounts required by this Agreement.
4.9 Records; Audit . . Contractor shall maintain complete accurate records concerning the Work and all related transactions for at least three (3) years from the date of Final Completion. This includes all records relating to compliance with Applicable Laws, compliance with Owner's drug and alcohol policy attached as Exhibit J , financial records related to the Work, employee qualifications and to the extent applicable US Department of Transportation requirements. At any time but not later than three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement, Owner may audit the records, invoices and substantiating material (including time records) as reasonably requested by Owner and as deemed necessary by Owner. Each payment made shall be subject to reduction and refund to Owner, or offset on future payments due Contractor, to the extent of amounts which are found by Owner not to have been properly payable or to have been overpaid, and shall also be subject to increase and payment to Contractor for underpayments to the extent of any amounts which are found by Owner to have been underpaid. Upon request by Owner, Contractor shall insert a clause containing all the provisions of this Article "Records; Audits" in all subcontracts to permit Owner to make identical Audits and inspections of the Records of all Subcontractors involved in performance of the Work. Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement to the contrary, however, the purpose of any such audit shall be only for verification of such Reimbursable Costs and Contractor shall not be required to keep records of or provide access to those of its costs covered by the Fee, allowances, fixed rates, or of costs which are expressed in terms of percentages of other costs.
23
4.10 No Duplication. . Nothing in this Agreement shall allow any duplication of any cost, expense, mark-up, overhead, or other charge.
4.11 Effect of Payment . . No payment, final or otherwise by Owner, shall be considered or deemed to represent that Owners or Owner's Project Manager or any other representative of Owner have inspected the Work, nor shall it constitute or be deemed an acceptance, in whole or in part, of any portion of the Work not, nor subsequently determined not to be, in accordance with the Contract Documents.
4.12 Security of Performance. . Within ninety (90) days following the Effective Date, Contractor shall provide Owner with the Performance Security as set forth in Exhibit O.
4.13 Wire Transfer Instructions. Owner shall make all payments due Contractor via wire transfer to Contractor's account as follows; Wells Fargo Bank, San Francisco, CA, ABA No. 121-000248, For Account: Fluor Enterprises, Account No. 4600-149983.
5.1 Change Order. . Change Orders may be initiated by either Owner or Contractor in accordance with this Article 5 . The Work, Target Price, Contract Completion Date, Target Cash Flow Budget and any other obligation under this Agreement shall only be adjusted as allowed under this Agreement and any adjustment shall be documented by a Change Order. It is the desire of the Parties to keep changes in the Work, the Contract Completion Date and the Target Cash Flow Budget at a minimum, but the Parties recognize that such changes may become necessary and agree that they shall be handled as follows.
5.2 Individuals Authorized to Make Changes. . All Change Orders must be approved and signed on behalf of Owner by Owner's Project Manager. Contractor's Project Director identified in Article 7.2 may approve and sign any Change Order on behalf of Contractor.
5.3.1 To the extent that Contractor demonstrates that a change affects adversely Contractor's (or its Subcontractor's) ability to perform the Work, increases the cost of the Work or its other obligations under this Agreement, or causes a delay in the Work Progress Schedule or the Contract Completion Date, Contractor shall be entitled to an appropriate adjustment to the Target Price, Contract Completion Date, Target Cash Flow Budget, Fee (as mutually agreed by the Parties if the cumulative adjustments to the Target Price exceeds ten million dollars, excluding adjustments arising under Section 5.3.2(5) and the cost of spare parts purchased by Contractor under the fourth sentence of Section 2.3) and any other affected obligation under this Agreement. If any change affects Contractor's ability to achieve Substantial Completion by the Contract Completion Date, Contractor shall at Owner's request prepare a draft Change
24
Order that, to the extent practical, does not adjust the Contract Completion Date, but compensates Contractor, as the case may be, for the effect of such Change by adjusting other milestones in the Work Progress Schedule or other provisions of this Agreement. Owner shall, in its sole discretion, accept such draft Change Order or direct a change that adjusts the Contract Completion Date.
5.3.2 Contractor shall be entitled to an appropriate adjustment to the Target Price, Contract Completion Date, Target Cash Flow Budget, Fee (as mutually agreed by the Parties if the cumulative adjustments to the Target Price exceeds ten million dollars, excluding adjustments arising under Section 5.3.2(5) and the cost of spare parts purchased by Contractor under the fourth sentence of Section 2.3) and any other affected obligation under this Agreement pursuant to a Change Order in any of the following events, provided Contractor also satisfies the requirements of Article 5.3.1 and 5.3.3 or 5.3.4 , as the case may be: (1) Owner-directed changes pursuant to Article 5.3.3 ; (2) the occurrence of an Uncontrollable Force; (3) an act or omission of Owner in breach of its obligations under this Agreement; (4) modifications to the Existing Work resulting from the assessment thereof pursuant to Article 2.25 ; (5) adjustments to the allowances included in the Target Price as of the Effective Date for the water treatment, gas pipeline and well water systems based on the finalization by Owner and Contractor of the subcontracts and scope of work related thereto, (6) the cost of operational spare parts to be procured under Article 2.3 and Contractor's inability, for reasons beyond its reasonable control, to obtain Spare Parts for testing, start-up and commissioning as contemplated by Article 2.3 , (7) any damage to the Owner-Furnished Property that is identified by Contractor during the performance of the Work, other than damage caused by Contractor or its Subcontractors, (8) any material or equipment not set forth in Attachment 1 of Exhibit L that is not provided by Owner as contemplated by Article 2.24.2 , (9) any increase in wages, benefits or payroll taxes due to governmental action, (10) modifications to the design criteria required during the performance of the Work by Owner or Owner's vendors with respect to the Existing Work or by changes in Applicable Law or Applicable Codes and Standards and (11) as otherwise provided in this Agreement.
5.3.3 Owner may initiate a change by advising Contractor in writing of the change believed to be necessary or desirable. As soon as practicable, Contractor shall prepare and forward to Owner a cost estimate and a schedule impact of the change, which shall include any applicable adjustment to the Target Price, Contract Completion Date, Target Cash Flow Budget, Fee (as mutually agreed by the Parties if the cumulative adjustments to the Target Price exceeds ten million dollars, excluding adjustments arising under Section 5.3.2(5) and the cost of spare parts purchased by Contractor under the fourth sentence of Section 2.3), and any effect on Contractor's ability to comply with any of its obligations under this Agreement, including warranties. Contractor shall also consider any potential adjustments to the Work, the Work Progress Schedule, or the Target Cash Flow Budget that may be undertaken to mitigate the effects of the change.
25
Contractor shall be reimbursed for the costs incurred to prepare any estimate. Owner shall advise Contractor in writing of its approval or disapproval of the change. If Owner approves the change, Contractor shall perform the Work as changed.
5.3.4 Contractor may propose changes by advising Owner in writing that in Contractor's opinion a change is necessary. If Owner agrees, it shall advise Contractor and, thereafter, the change shall be handled as if initiated by Owner, (except that unless otherwise agreed by Owner, Contractor shall not be reimbursed for the cost of preparing estimates for Contractor proposed changes).
5.4 If No Agreement. . If either Owner or Contractor disputes the existence, extent, validity of a change or is unable to reach agreement on the terms of any change in the Work, including, but not limited to, an adjustment in the Target Price or Contract Completion Date, then either Party may notify the other Party that it desires to meet and resolve the dispute in accordance with Article 12 .
ARTICLE 6
INSPECTION AND WARRANTY
6.1.1 Contractor warrants it will perform the Work (other than the portions of the Work described in Articles 6.1.2 and 6.2 ), in accordance with GECP and in accordance with Applicable Law, and that such Work shall be free of any defect in equipment, materials, and workmanship performed by Contractor and its Subcontractors. Contractor shall deliver a Fully Dispatchable Facility. If Contractor fails to meet the standards set forth in this Article 6.1.1 and Owner gives Contractor notice of any such failure or defect as promptly as practicable after discovery of such failure, but in no event later than one (1) year after Substantial Completion of the Facility (the "Warranty Period"), Contractor shall remedy such deficiency as a Reimbursable Cost that is included in the Contract Sum and chargeable against the Target Price, so that such Work conforms to those standards.
6.1.2 Contractor shall assign to Owner or facilitate the assignment of warranties from Teton Industrial Company and MMR Group to Owner with regard to their respective portions of the Existing Work and the Work. In addition, Contractor shall, for the protection of Owner, demand from all other Subcontractors from which Contractor procures machinery, equipment or materials or Work, warranties and guarantees with respect to such machinery, equipment, materials or Work, which shall be made available to Owner to the full extent of the terms thereof. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, all materials and equipment so procured by Contractor shall be new, and both workmanship and material shall be of good quality. Equipment and material which are
26
procured by Contractor, but fail to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents, shall be removed and replaced with complying equipment and material as a Reimbursable Cost that is included in the Contract Sum and is chargeable against the Target Price to the extent such removal and replacement are not covered by the warranties or guarantees obtained from a Subcontractor. However, if the progress of Work is such to make such removal impractical, Owner shall have the right to accept it and reduce the Target Price by an amount equivalent to any recovery from the relevant Subcontractor for the difference in its value and the value of complying equipment or material. Owner may perform such factory or field tests as are deemed necessary to verify that equipment meets the Contract Documents. Contractor shall be permitted to witness such tests. Contractor's warranty liability with respect to all machinery, equipment and materials or Work obtained from Subcontractors in connection with the Facility shall be limited to procuring warranties and guarantees from such Subcontractors in the case of machinery, equipment, materials or Work procured as part of the Work, and rendering all reasonable assistance to Owner for the purpose of enforcing applicable warranties and guarantees. All costs incurred by Contractor in performing such Work shall be Reimbursable Costs that are not included in the Contract Sum and that are not chargeable against the Target Price. All Subcontractors', manufacturers', and suppliers' warranties and guaranties, express or implied, respecting any part of the Work and any materials used therein shall be deemed obtained by Contractor for the benefit of Owner without the necessity of separate transfer or assignment thereof. Contractor shall assign such warranties and guaranties to Owner upon Substantial Completion.
6.1.3 All Work repaired or replaced pursuant to this Article 6.1 shall also be subject to the provisions of this Article 6.1 to the same extent as Work originally performed, except that the Warranty Period with respect thereto shall run from the date of completion of the repair or replacement; provided, however, in all cases the Warranty Period shall expire two (2) years following Substantial Completion.
6.1.4 If requested by Owner, Contractor will assist Owner in obtaining and administering any other warranties with respect to the Existing Work and the costs of any such administration will be Reimbursable Costs but will not be included in the Contract Sum and will not be charged against the Target Price.
6.2 Engineering and Design Warranty. . Contractor warrants it will perform its engineering and design Services, as more particularly described in Exhibit A ("Engineering Services") in accordance with the current standards of care and diligence normally practiced by recognized engineering firms in performing services of a similar nature. Further, Contractor warrants that the engineering and design performed by Duke/Fluor Daniel ("D/FD Engineering Services") as part of the Existing Work have been performed in accordance with the then current standards of care and diligence normally practiced by recognized engineering firms in performing services of a similar nature. If within one (1) year after Substantial Completion it is shown that there is an error in the Engineering Services or D/FD Engineering Services as a result of either Contractor's
27
or Duke/Fluor Daniel's failure to meet those standards and Owner has notified Contractor in writing of any such error within that period, Contractor shall reperform such Engineering Services or D/FD Engineering Services within the original scope of such services, as may be necessary to remedy such error. All costs incurred by Contractor in performing such corrective services shall be to the account of Contractor, subject to an aggregate limit of liability of $1,000,000, and such costs shall not be included in the Reimbursable Costs under this Agreement except to the extent such costs exceed such limit of liability amount. To the extent any Engineering Services or D/FD Engineering Services are reperformed with the result that modifications to the Work are necessary, Contractor shall perform such modifications as a Reimbursable Cost that is included in the Contract Sum and chargeable against the Target Price prior to Final Completion. After Final Completion and up to the final True-Up, Contractor shall remain available to perform such modifications as a Reimbursable Cost that is included in the Contract Sum and chargeable against the Target Price.
6.3.1 All Work shall be subject to reasonable inspection by Owner, or its representatives or consultants at all times to determine whether or not the Work conforms to the Contract Documents. Contractor shall provide Owner access to the Work wherever located. Owner may visit and inspect the Work, or any part thereof, at any time, and Contractor shall provide safe and proper access for inspection of the Work. Owner may be present at any test to be performed. Contractor shall furnish promptly, as a Reimbursable Cost, all reasonable facilities, labor, and materials necessary for the safe and convenient inspection and testing that may be required by Owner. All inspections and tests by Owner shall be performed in such manner as not to unnecessarily delay the Work. All such tests and inspections shall not relieve Contractor of its obligations.
6.3.2 If Contractor fails to provide Owner with reasonable opportunity to inspect the Work, and if in the opinion of Owner it is necessary to uncover or dismantle such Work for such inspection, then Contractor shall uncover, dismantle and recover the Work as necessary for such inspection. If such inspection reveals a defect or deficiency in the Work, Contractor's cost of uncovering, dismantling and recovering the Work shall be a Reimbursable Cost that is included in the Contract Sum and chargeable against the Target Price. If such inspection does not reveal a defect or deficiency in the Work, Contractor's cost of uncovering, dismantling and recovering the Work shall be a Reimbursable Cost that is not included in the Contract Sum and that is not chargeable against the Target Price.
6.3.3 Where Owner has a reasonable belief that there is a defect or deficiency, even though Contractor has given Owner reasonable opportunity to inspect the Work and Owner subsequently requires uncovering, having made no comment during the original inspection, Contractor shall nevertheless uncover, dismantle and recover the Work as necessary for such inspection. If such inspection reveals a defect or deficiency in the Work, Contractor's cost of uncovering, dismantling and recovering the Work shall be a Reimbursable Cost that is included in the
28
Contract Sum and chargeable against the Target Price. If such inspection does not reveal a defect or deficiency in the Work, Contractor's cost of uncovering, dismantling and recovering the Work shall be a Reimbursable Cost that is not included in the Contract Sum and that is not chargeable against the Target Price.
6.4 Correction of Defects . . If Contractor does not take action to correct any defects or deficiencies for which it is responsible under the Contract Documents within a reasonable time after receipt of Owner's written notice thereof, Owner may, as its sole option, (a) terminate or suspend the right of Contractor to proceed with the Work as provided in Article 11.3 "Termination by Owner for Cause " or Article 11.6 "Suspension of the Work", (b) take such corrective action itself or through contract with others (the cost of which shall be included in the Contract Sum), or (c) deduct an equitable amount from the Target Price pursuant to a Change Order for defects or deficiencies in the Work in lieu of correcting Work that was not performed in accordance with the Contract Documents.
6.5 Limitations . . The obligations contained in this Article 6 govern and supersede any other terms in this Agreement which address warranties, guarantees, or the quality of the Work and are Contractor's sole warranty and guarantee obligations and Owner's exclusive remedies with respect thereto. Contractor makes no other warranties or guarantees, express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose which are expressly disclaimed and waived. Contractor shall have no warranty obligation or liability for defects in the Work caused by Owner's improper operation or maintenance of the Facility. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, as between Owner and Contractor, Owner shall be responsible for defects with respect to the Existing Work other than as set forth in Article 6.2.
6.6.1 Contractor shall include, as a term of each Subcontract, a warranty that all materials and equipment furnished by its Subcontractors that become part of the Facility or are purchased by Contractor for Owner for the operation, maintenance or repair thereof shall be legally and beneficially owned by the Owner free from any encumbrance whatsoever. Title to all such materials and equipment shall pass to Owner upon the earlier of (a) delivery to the Site, or (b) the passage of title from a Subcontractor to Contractor under the applicable subcontract, purchase order or other agreement. Notwithstanding passage of title, Contractor shall retain sole care, custody and control of such materials and equipment and shall exercise due care with respect thereto in accordance with Article 2.13 .
6.6.2 In order to protect Owner's interest in all materials and equipment with respect to which title has passed to Owner but which remain in the possession of a third party, Contractor shall follow the directions of Owner with respect to the action to be taken by Contractor to maintain Owner's clear title and to protect Owner against claims by other parties with respect thereto, and the costs incurred by Contractor in so doing shall be a Reimbursable Cost.
29
6.6.3 So long as Owner pays all amounts due Contractor pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor agrees that it shall not establish, and shall not allow its employees, agents or Subcontractors to maintain, any contractor's or laborer's encumbrance on the Work or the Facility or any part thereof.
6.6.4 Contractor shall not file or permit any liens on the Work or the Facility without Owner's prior written consent; provided that this clause shall not prohibit Contractor from filing a lien allowed under Applicable Law to secure amounts due from Owner under this Agreement. Contractor shall follow the directions of Owner with respect to the action to be taken by Contractor regarding any mechanic's or materialmen's liens arising from the Work and Contractor shall if ordered by Owner, as soon as practical discharge any encumbrance filed by any Subcontractor against the Facility based on a claim for payment in connection with the Work, and the costs incurred by Contractor in so doing shall be a Reimbursable Cost.
6.6.5 Contractor shall provide prompt notice to Owner of any encumbrance of which it receives notice.
6.6.6 In the event Contractor fails to discharge any such encumbrance within a reasonable period or otherwise provide Owner with adequate assurances or security with regard to any such encumbrance arising in respect of the Work or the Facility, Owner shall have the right to discharge the same and such costs shall be charged against the Target Price as part of the Contract Sum.
ARTICLE 7
REPRESENTATIVES AND NOTICES
7.1 Owner's Project Manager. . Owner appoints the following individual as its "Owner's Project Manager" :
Name: |
Jimmy L. Gonzales |
Address: |
PNM
|
E-mail: |
jgonzal3@pnm.com |
Telephone: |
(505) 855-6326 |
Cell Phone: |
(505) 681-0964 |
Fax: |
(505) 855-6320 |
The Owner's Project Manager shall be authorized to act on behalf of Owner, with whom Contractor may consult at all reasonable times, and whose instructions, requests, and decisions shall be binding upon Owner as to all matters pertaining to this Agreement and the performance of the Parties hereunder. Without limiting the foregoing, the responsibilities of Owner's Project
30
Manager shall encompass but not be limited to (1) issuance of instructions, (2) interpretation of plans, (3) review and inspection of Contractor's Work, (4) rejection of nonconforming Work, (5) determination of when the Work is complete, (6) approval of progress payments and final payment, and (7) approval of certain Change Orders as set forth in Article 5 "Changes in the Work" . All communications from Contractor to Owner shall be directed to Owner's Project Manager and all communications from Owner to Contractor shall be directed from the Owner's Project Manager. Owner may appoint another person as Owner's Project Manager at any time by written notice to Contractor from the current Owner's Project Manager. Directions from the Owner's Project Manager shall be deemed to be the direction of each and every Owner, and Contractor shall be entitled to rely upon same.
7.2 Contractor's Project Director. . Contractor appoints the following individual as its "Project Director" in charge of Contractor's performance and execution of the Work:
Name: |
Richard Meserole |
Address: |
Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
|
E-mail: |
richard.meserole@fluor.com |
Telephone: |
(281) 263-2038 |
Cell Phone: |
(281) 705-9990 |
Fax: |
(281) 263-5567 |
All instructions, requests for Change Orders and all other communications from Owner to the Contractor shall be directed to the Project Director.
7.3 Notices. . Except as expressly provided otherwise herein, any formal notice, demand, or request provided for in the Contract Documents shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly made if personally delivered, delivered by courier, or sent by first-class mail, postage prepaid, or by facsimile to the facsimile number to the person specified above and shall be deemed received, if personally delivered, or delivered by courier, upon delivery, and if mailed, on the third Business Day following deposit in the U.S. mail, and if sent by facsimile, upon transmission (electronic transmission to the e-mail address specified above may be done in addition to delivery of a paper copy).
7.4 Changes. . Each Party shall provide the other Party with notice when its respective address, contact person, telephone number, e-mail address, or facsimile number changes to which notices are to be sent.
7.5 Ordinary Course. . Nothing contained herein shall preclude the transmission of routine invoices or correspondence, messages and information between the Parties by a representative of a Party in the ordinary course of performing their respective obligations under the Contract Documents.
31
ARTICLE 8
PRIOR WORK AND WORK SITE
8.1 Prior Work and Site Investigation. . Contractor is familiar with the status of Facility construction, the Plant Site and conditions therein. Contractor accepts, as part of the Work and subject to the warranties of this Agreement, the D/FD Engineering Services previously provided, but not any portion of the Facility that was procured or constructed as of the date of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the fact that Contractor may have received certain Site information from Owner but subject to the assessment contemplated by Article 2.25 , Contractor represents to Owner that Contractor has independently satisfied itself as to the status of completion, nature and location of the Work, the general and local conditions, particularly those bearing upon transportation, disposal, and handling and storage of materials, availability of labor, water, electric power, roads, and uncertainties of weather, river stages, or similar physical conditions at the Site, the conformation and conditions of the ground, the character, quality, and quantity of surface and subsurface materials to be encountered as reflected in the geotechnical reports.
8.2 Lines and Grades. . Contractor shall establish construction base lines and bench marks for the Work. Said base lines and bench marks, and all stakes or other markers established shall be preserved by Contractor until their removal is authorized by Owner. Owner may, from time to time, check the layout of Contractor, but such checking shall in no way relieve Contractor of its responsibility for the accuracy of the Work. Contractor shall provide, at the request of Owner and as a Reimbursable Cost, competent personnel to assist in this checking.
8.3 Specifications and Drawings. . Contractor shall maintain at the Plant Site a copy of the "approved for construction" working specifications and drawings (including "as-built drawings") applicable to the Work with all changes and modifications, and shall at all times, give Owner access thereto. Anything mentioned in the specifications and not shown on the drawings or shown on the drawings and not mentioned in the specifications, shall be of like effect as if shown or mentioned in both.
8.3.1 "As-Built" Drawings. Contractor shall provide and keep at the Plant Site a complete "as-built" record set of drawings (also called "record drawings") that shall be updated periodically. The drawings shall reflect exact and actual "as-built" conditions of construction, installation, and erection as it progresses. Where drawings are not adequate to show "as-built" conditions, Contractor shall prepare sketches which delineate the necessary "as-built" information. Contractor shall furnish two (2) sets of all paper "blue-line" prints "approved" drawings for use in accomplishing specified mark-up. Final "as-built" drawings, and a computerized disk of such drawings, shall be delivered to Owner by Contractor on or before Final Completion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to the Existing Work, Owner has provided Contractor with certain "as-built" drawings and Contractor's responsibilities with respect to such drawings shall be limited to updates as necessary to reflect modifications to the Existing Work or conditions identified by Contractor through the course of performance of the Work.
32
8.4 Use of Premises . . Contractor shall confine the storage of materials and construction equipment in connection with the Work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, regulations, and laws and Contractor's safety procedures. Contractor shall provide adequate safety barriers, signs, lanterns, and other warning devices and services to properly protect any person having access to or near the areas where Work is being performed at the Site. Contractor shall follow Owner's instructions concerning the location of signs and posters, the time and location of the burning of debris, and any other similar nuisance items.
8.5 Cleaning Up . . Contractor shall, at all times, keep the Plant Site and other locations on the Site where the Work is performed, including storage areas used by it, in a clean and orderly condition and (free from weeds inside the Plant Site), combustible debris, and waste materials. Upon completion of the Work, Contractor shall remove all rubbish from and about the premises and restore the Plant Site, other locations on the Site where the Work is performed and material storage locations at the Site to their original condition with special respect to ruts, and debris of all kinds. Contractor, unless otherwise directed, shall return all unused material, to an Owner designated storage area at the Plant Site.
8.6 Underground Facilities. . Contractor shall be familiar with the requirements of the respective underground facility laws of the State of New Mexico. Contractor shall identify (through "as-built" drawings, inspection or otherwise) to the extent necessary to perform the Work all underground facilities in the areas on the Site where Work is to be performed, including, but not limited to, gas, electric, telephone, water, drain lines, sewer, and the like. Contractor will take the necessary steps to safeguard these underground facilities. With respect to areas outside of the Plant Site, Contractor may rely on third parties, as necessary and appropriate, and in compliance with Applicable Laws. Contractor shall notify the Owner's Project Manager, who will file a report of accident with the local Owner office at the time of any damage.
8.7 Other Contracts. . Owner may undertake or award other contracts for additional work at or near the Site. Contractor shall fully cooperate with the other contractors and with Owner employees, and carefully coordinate scheduling and performing the Work to accommodate the additional work, heeding any direction that may be provided by Owner. Contractor shall not commit nor permit any act that will interfere with the performance of work by any other contractor or by Owner employees.
ARTICLE 9
[INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]
ARTICLE 10
COMPLETION OF THE WORK
10.1.1 Mechanical Completion shall occur with respect to the Facility when the following requirements have been satisfied:
33
(a) Contractor has constructed and installed all materials, equipment, components and systems constituting the Facility (except for completion of minor portions of the Work such as painting, final grading, final insulation, and any other portion of the Work not affecting the reliability, dependability, operability, safety, and mechanical and electrical integrity of the Facility) in all material respects in accordance with the Agreement;
(b) Contractor has made available for inspection by Owner all Facility systems necessary to begin Performance Tests in accordance with procedures mutually agreed to at the time by Contractor and Owner;
(c) the Work is mechanically and electrically sound, all systems have been flushed, cleaned out and filled as necessary and all required pre-operations checking and testing has been completed satisfactorily and all systems have been started up in accordance with procedures mutually agreed to at the time by Contractor and Owner; and
(d) all systems and subsystems have been installed, the equipment and systems included therein can be operated in a manner that does not void any Subcontractor or system warranty and Contractor has made the Facility available for synchronization.
10.1.2 When Contractor believes that the requirements of Mechanical Completion have been met, Contractor shall issue a notice of Mechanical Completion to Owner. Within five (5) Days after receiving such notice of Mechanical Completion, Owner shall advise Contractor, in writing, with reasonable precision, of any known reason(s) to believe that Contractor has not met the criteria for Mechanical Completion. If Owner advises of any such reason(s), Contractor shall then take appropriate corrective action and again notify Owner, in writing, that the Facility has achieved Mechanical Completion. Owner shall have five (5) Days after receipt of such notification to advise Contractor of any remaining known reason(s) under the preceding paragraph why Contractor has not met the criteria for Mechanical Completion. This process shall be repeated as necessary until Owner agrees that no such reasons remain. If Owner fails to notify Contractor of any such known reasons within the allotted time, the Facility shall be deemed to have achieved Mechanical Completion. Otherwise, Mechanical Completion shall not be achieved until Owner and Contractor agree that all of the criteria for Mechanical Completion have been achieved.
10.2.1 Contractor may commence the Performance Tests any time after achieving Mechanical Completion of the Facility.
10.2.2 Contractor shall provide Owner with its schedule of Performance Tests, and its expected requirements for natural gas for such tests, at least sixty (60) days
34
prior to the scheduled commencement date of those tests. Contractor shall provide Owner with notice at least twenty (20) days prior to the date on which it intends to commence the Performance Tests and again forty-eight (48) hours in advance of the initial test.
10.2.3 Contractor shall furnish reports of all successful Performance Tests to Owner and to others as may be reasonably requested by Owner. Contractor shall provide access to available data for unsuccessful test and re-tests only upon Owner's request.
10.2.4 Contractor shall maintain qualified personnel on the Site to supervise the activities of operating personnel regarding the operation and maintenance of the Facility until turnover upon Substantial Completion, and to provide technical direction for any Performance Tests including any re-testing periods following Substantial Completion.
10.2.5 At any time during and promptly after completion (whether or not apparently successful) of the Performance Tests (including without limitation any re-run of such tests), Owner shall advise Contractor and Contractor shall advise Owner in writing of any defects and deficiencies in the Facility or in its performance that were discovered or observed during such tests that render any of the Performance Tests results inaccurate and thus make such test unsuccessful. Contractor shall, as a Reimbursable Cost, correct such defects and deficiencies and promptly advise Owner of such correction, specifying the measures taken and, if such defects and deficiencies require re-running of those tests, the date on which the Facility will be ready for the applicable Performance Tests to be re-run. Subject to the further provisions of this Agreement, such tests shall thereafter be re-run promptly and the procedure set forth above in this Article 10.2 shall be repeated until all Performance Tests have been satisfactorily completed and all such defects and deficiencies have been corrected.
10.3.1 Substantial Completion shall occur on the date on which: (i) Mechanical Completion has occurred, (ii) the Performance Tests required for Substantial Completion in Exhibit A have been completed, (iii) the Facility has achieved 95% or more of the Target Performance Criteria for Facility output and 105% or less of the Target Performance Criteria for Facility heat rate, (iv) a thirty (30) hour continuous operation of the Facility has been demonstrated in accordance with the continuous operation test as described in Exhibit A, and (v) there are no known items of uncompleted Work as of such date that would prevent compliance with the criteria in Article 10.1.1(a), (c) and (d) ;
10.3.2 When Contractor believes it has achieved Substantial Completion of the Facility, Contractor shall tender a certificate of Substantial Completion to Owner in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit F-1 , together with documentation sufficient for independent verification. Owner shall accept or
35
reject Contractor's certification of Substantial Completion in writing within five (5) Business Days after receipt of Contractor's tender. If Owner fails to notify Contractor of any such known reasons within the allotted time, the Facility shall be deemed to have achieved Substantial Completion. If Owner rejects Contractor's certification of Substantial Completion, Owner shall identify its reasons for rejection in detail sufficient for verification and thereafter Contractor shall:
(a) take prompt corrective action, as necessary, to achieve the requirements of Substantial Completion, and then submit a new certification of Substantial Completion to Owner as provided for above; or
(b) disagree with Owner's reasons for such rejection, promptly notify Owner, and the Parties shall attempt to resolve the disagreement without delay. If the disagreement cannot be resolved within five (5) Business Days, then Contractor may cease further Performance Testing and seek a determination whether or not Substantial Completion has been achieved under Article 12 " Dispute Resolution".
10.3.3 Notwithstanding the obligations of Contractor set forth in Articles 10.3.1 and 10.3.2 , if Contractor is unsuccessful in meeting the Target Performance Criteria for the Facility after reasonable efforts to do so within ninety (90) days of the commencement of initial Performance Tests, Contractor shall not be obligated to continue to run Performance Tests. In such case, Owner and Contractor shall discuss alternatives that may be available to Owner that may remedy the problems that Owner and Contractor have encountered during the attempted Performance Tests. Contractor's costs of implementing any such alternative(s) that are agreed upon shall be Reimbursable Costs that are not included in the Contract Sum and not chargeable against the Target Price.
10.4 Punch List . . At the time of submitting a certificate of Substantial Completion, Contractor shall prepare and submit to Owner a Punch List and an estimate of costs necessary to complete the Punch List. Owner shall have five (5) Business Days from receipt of said Punch List to provide any comments to the Punch List. The Parties shall review the Punch List and discuss the items to be included in a mutually agreed Punch List, with an estimate of the cost to complete the Punch List items. Contractor shall diligently pursue completion of the Punch List within sixty (60) days following Substantial Completion as a Reimbursable Cost and shall notify Owner in writing upon Contractor's determination that Punch List Work is complete. Owner shall have five (5) Business Days to accept or reject Contractor's determination that the Punch List Work is complete. If Owner rejects Contractor's determination, then Contractor may seek a determination whether or not the Punch List Work is complete under Article 12 "Dispute Resolution" .
36
10.5.1 Final Completion shall occur on the date on which: (a) Mechanical Completion has occurred for the Facility, (b) Substantial Completion has occurred for the Facility, and (c) all other requirements for final payment under Article 4 have been completed, including completion of all Work remaining on the Punch List.
10.5.2 When Contractor believes it has achieved Final Completion, Contractor shall tender a certificate of Final Completion to Owner substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F-2 , and shall submit a request for final payment pursuant to Article 4 "Compensation". Owner shall accept or reject Contractor's determination of Final Completion in writing within five (5) Business Days after receipt of Contractor's tender. If Owner fails to notify Contractor of any such known reasons within the allotted time, the Facility shall be deemed to have achieved Final Completion. If Owner rejects Contractor's determination of Final Completion, Owner shall identify its reasons for rejection in detail sufficient for verification and thereafter Contractor shall:
(a) take prompt corrective action, as necessary, to achieve the requirements for Final Completion, and then submit a new determination of Final Completion to Owner as provided for above; or
(b) disagree with Owner's reasons for such rejection, promptly notify Owner, and the Parties shall attempt to resolve the disagreement without delay. If the disagreement cannot be resolved within five (5) Business Days, then Contractor may seek a determination whether or not Final Completion has been achieved under Article 12 "Dispute Resolution".
ARTICLE 11
DEFAULT AND TERMINATION
11.1 Contractor Default. . Contractor shall be deemed to be in default if it at any time during the performance of the Work Contractor shall:
(a) Materially fail to prosecute the Work or any portion thereof with sufficient diligence or otherwise commit a substantial breach of any material provision of this Agreement and Contractor does not commence and diligently proceed to cure such failure or breach within fifteen (15) calendar days following delivery of a notice from Owner to Contractor to remedy such failure or breach;
(b) Become insolvent or make a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors;
(c) File a petition in bankruptcy or have a petition in bankruptcy filed against it or an attachment or execution levied upon any of its property used hereunder, or have a receiver for its business appointed on account of the condition of such business or of insolvency;
(d) Have any legal proceeding taken against it that interferes with the diligent and efficient performance and satisfactory completion of the Work and Contractor
37
does not succeed in having such legal proceeding dismissed or stayed within fifteen (15) calendar days following delivery of a notice from Owner to Contractor requesting Contractor to do so;
(e) Materially disregard or fail to comply with laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, or orders of any public authority having jurisdiction and Contractor does not commence and diligently proceed to cure such failure within fifteen (15) calendar days following delivery of a notice from Owner to Contractor to remedy such failure;
(f) Attempt to assign this Agreement without obtaining Owner's prior consent; or
(g) Failure to make an undisputed payment to Owner when due hereunder and Contractor does not cure such failure within five (5) Business Days following delivery of a notice from Owner to Contractor to remedy such failure;
11.2 Right to Terminate for Cause. . If at any time Contractor shall be deemed in default pursuant to Article 11.1 "Default " , Owner may elect to terminate this Agreement in accordance with Article 11.3 "Termination by Owner for Cause " .
11.3 Termination by Owner for Cause . . If Owner elects to terminate this Agreement due to Contractor's default under the terms of Article 11.1, Owner shall give written notice of termination to Contractor specifying the date of termination, which date shall provide Contractor with a reasonable period during which Contractor is able to demobilize, which period shall be no shorter than ten (10) Business Days. Owner may, at its option, (a) take possession of the Site and take possession of or use all materials, equipment, tools, and construction equipment and machinery owned by Contractor to maintain the orderly progress of, and to finish the Work; or (b) finish the Work by whatever other reasonable method it deems expedient.
11.3.1 Upon any such termination for cause, Contractor shall be compensated for all Reimbursable Costs incurred for Work then performed. In the event that Owner uses any of Contractor's equipment or tools, Owner shall return the same to Contractor in good condition and repair, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and shall pay Contractor for the use thereof as provided in Article 4 . If the difference between the Target Price and the balance of the Contract Sum through the date of such takeover by Owner exceeds the cost of finishing the Work and any other extra costs or damages incurred by Owner in completing the Work, or otherwise as a result of Contractor's default, Contractor shall be compensated for the earned portion of the Fee provided for in Article 4 , prorated for the month based upon when the effective date of the termination occurs in addition to the above Reimbursable Costs. If such costs of finishing the Work and any other extra costs or damages incurred by Owner in completing the Work, or otherwise as a result of Contractor's default, exceed the sum of [*] plus the difference between the Target Price and the balance of the Contract Sum through the date of such takeover by Owner, such excess shall be deemed an Overrun and Contractor shall pay [*] of such excess costs to Owner, subject to the limitation on Contractor's responsibility for Overruns as
38
set forth in Article 4.4 . These obligations for payment shall survive termination of this Agreement.
11.3.2 Termination of the Work in accordance with this Article shall not relieve Contractor of its responsibilities for Work performed.
11.3.3 If Owner terminates Contractor for default under this Article , and it is later determined that Contractor was not in default, then such termination shall be deemed a termination for convenience pursuant to Article 11.4 .
11.4 Termination by Owner for Convenience . . Owner may, upon thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice to Contractor, suspend, abandon, or terminate the Work, or any portion thereof, and terminate this Agreement, for any reason whatsoever including for the convenience of Owner without regard to whether or not Contractor has defaulted or failed to comply with the provisions of the Contract Documents.
11.4.1 If Owner terminates the Work, or any portion thereof for convenience, Owner shall pay Contractor for all Reimbursable Costs for the parts of the Work done prior to the effective date of termination, including materials provided, plus any Subcontractor or vendor cancellation costs, plus an amount for the Contractor's substantiated, reasonable direct costs necessarily incurred in preparation for the parts of the Work not yet performed and in shutting down its operations; plus an amount for a reasonable part of the Fee which Contractor would otherwise have earned for the percentage of Work performed prior to such termination. Contractor shall not be entitled to any other costs or damages whatsoever arising out of Contractor's performance of the Work and the termination by Owner for convenience.
11.5 Stopping Work. . When Owner terminates the Work in accordance with Article 11.3 "Termination by Owner for Cause" or 11.4 "Termination by Owner for Convenience", Contractor shall take the actions set forth below.
11.5.1 Unless Owner directs otherwise, after receipt of a written notice of termination for either cause or convenience, Contractor shall promptly: (1) stop performing Work on the date and as specified in the notice of termination; (2) place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, equipment, services or facilities, except as may be necessary for completion of such portion of the Work that is not terminated; (3) cancel all orders and subcontracts, upon terms acceptable to Owner, to the extent that they relate to the performance of Work terminated; (4) assign to Owner all of the right, title, and interest of Contractor in all orders and subcontracts; (5) deliver completed Work to Owner and take such action as may be necessary or as directed by Owner to preserve and protect the Work, Site, and any other property related to the Work in the possession of Contractor in which Owner has an interest; and (6) continue performance only to the extent not terminated.
39
11.5.2 In the case of any termination, Contractor shall proceed with the orderly demobilization and close out of the Work, and the costs for such services shall be Reimbursable Costs.
11.6 Suspension of the Work . . Owner may, for any reason, at any time suspend the carrying out of the Work or any part thereof by ten (10) Business Days advance written notice to Contractor. Any such notice shall specify the date of suspension, the expected duration of the suspension and any other information relevant to the scope of work being suspended. Whereupon Contractor shall suspend the carrying out of the Work or any part thereof for such time or times and in such manner as Owner may require. During any such suspension, Contractor shall properly protect and secure the Work in such manner as Owner may reasonably require. Unless otherwise instructed by Owner, Contractor shall, during any such suspension, maintain its staff and labor on or near the Site and otherwise be ready to proceed with the Work upon receipt of Owner's further instructions. Should the Work be so suspended, Contractor shall be paid for all costs incurred in accordance with the provision of Article 4 and the applicable portion of the Fee earned for Work performed to the date of suspension and through demobilization, including any suspension or cancellation charges by Subcontractors. When a suspension equals or exceeds one hundred eighty (180) Days in the aggregate, Contractor may elect to treat such suspension as a Cancellation for Convenience of Owner pursuant to Article 11.4 . Owner and Contractor shall negotiate a Change Order to address the impact of any suspension by Owner hereunder on the Target Price, the Work Progress Schedule and Contract Completion Date in accordance with Article 5 "Changes in the Work" of the Agreement.
11.7 Owner Default. . Should any Owner Party become insolvent or bankrupt and the other Owner Parties do not provide Contractor with reasonable assurance of their continued willingness and ability to perform the obligations of Owner hereunder or should Owner commit a breach or default of any of the covenants or obligations hereunder and (a) fail to remedy the same within ten (10) calendar days after written notice thereof from Contractor if the breach constitutes a failure to pay money, or (b) fail to commence proceedings to remedy the same within ten (10) calendar days after written notice thereof from Contractor and thereafter to proceed diligently in remedying the same if the breach is other than to pay money, then Contractor may, at its option, suspend performance or terminate this Agreement. Should Contractor so suspend or terminate this Agreement, it shall be paid for all costs incurred and Work performed to the date of suspension/termination in accordance with the provisions of Article 4 , including any cancellation charges by Subcontractors, and the cost of all standby and demobilization/remobilization expenses plus the earned portion of the Fee provided for in Article 4 .
11.8 Delivery of Documents . . Upon the suspension or termination of this Agreement, in whole or in part, pursuant to either Article 11.3 "Termination by Owner for Cause", 11.4 " Termination by Owner for Convenience", 11.6 "Suspension of the Work " or 11.7 "Owner Default", Contractor shall execute and deliver all such instruments and take all such steps, including assignment of its contractual rights with third parties, as may be required to fully vest in Owner all right, title, and interest in all Work, including but not limited to all plans, specifications, deliverables, materials, and equipment procured and all contractual rights, and/or cancel or terminate, at Owner's option, such of those contractual rights including, but not limited to, subcontracts and purchase orders as may be requested in writing by Owner.
40
12.1 Dispute Resolution. . Initially, Owner's Project Manager and Contractor's Project Director shall attempt to resolve any dispute that may arise in connection with this Agreement. If they are unable to resolve the dispute within ten (10) days, either Party may, by notice, refer the dispute to the senior management of the Parties for resolution. If the senior management of the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute within ten (10) days of meeting initially to resolve the dispute, the dispute may be submitted to mediation upon the mutual agreement of the Parties. In the event the Parties do not agree to mediate the dispute or are unable to resolve the dispute through mediation and the aggregate amount of the claim (including counterclaims) is less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), then the dispute shall be resolved by binding arbitration. Such arbitration shall be governed by the New Mexico Uniform Arbitration Act, NMSA 1978 § 44-7A-1, et seq . as amended. A Party electing to submit a dispute to arbitration shall give the other Party a timely Demand for Arbitration pursuant to Article 7.3 "Notices" and such Demand for Arbitration shall describe the nature of the dispute and the amount in controversy. The Parties shall then jointly select an arbitrator and failing such mutual agreement, the arbitrator shall be appointed by a New Mexico State District Court Judge. The arbitration shall be held in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Discovery shall be by agreement of the Parties or as ordered by the arbitrator, provided that the Parties shall comply with the following minimum discovery requirements: at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the arbitration, the Parties shall exchange copies of all exhibits to be used at the arbitration, all project documents in any way related to the dispute, a list of witnesses and a summary of the matters as to which each witness is expected to testify. A reasonable number of depositions may be taken. All costs of mediation and arbitration (including the fees of the mediator and arbitrator) shall be split equally by the Parties, except that the Parties shall be responsible for payment of their own attorney fees, expert fees, preparation fees, travel costs, witness fees, photocopying and similar costs. This agreement to arbitrate shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law of the State of New Mexico. Indemnity claims are not subject to mandatory arbitration. If the aggregate amount of the claim in dispute exceeds One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), then the Parties may agree to submit the matter to binding arbitration under the New Mexico Uniform Arbitration Act, NMSA 1978 § 44-7A-1, et seq . as amended, and failing such agreement, either Party may bring an action only in the federal or state courts of New Mexico (however, indemnity claims against a Party may also be brought in any court or tribunal in which the other Party is initially sued). Nothing in this Article shall affect a Party's right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Article 11 "Default and Termination " .
12.2 Waiver of Jury Trial. . To the full extent permitted by law, Owner and Contractor hereby knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally waive any rights they may have to a trial by jury in respect to any litigation based hereon, or arising out of, under, or in connection with, this Agreement, or any course of conduct, course of dealing, statements (whether oral or written) or actions of Owner or Contractor. The Parties acknowledge and agree that they have received full and sufficient consideration for this provision and that this provision is a material inducement for each Party entering into this Agreement.
41
ARTICLE 13
INDEMNITY AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY
13.1 General Liability; Indemnification . . Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless Owner, including its officers, employees or agents, for bodily injury to or death or damage to third party property only to the extent that the liability, damages, losses or costs are caused by, or arise out of, the negligence or willful misconduct of Contractor or its officers, employees or agents in the performance of the Work.
13.2 Liability for Owner Property . . Except as provided in Article 2.13, the Parties agree that Owner's property insurance will cover all risks, damage and losses to property owned by or in the custody of Owner prior to Substantial Completion. After Substantial Completion, Owner's property insurance, which is to be provided pursuant to Article 15.4, will cover all risks, damage and losses to property owned by or in the custody of Owner. Deductibles for losses covered under the property coverage and non-covered losses shall be paid by Owner and Owner hereby releases Contractor from any liability for property damage arising from the ownership, use or operation of the Facility or any part thereof, subsequent to the transfer of care, custody and control to Owner. If at any time the Owner Parties are not the sole owners of the Facility or existing property at the Site or operators of the Facility, Owner shall obtain waivers and releases from such other owners or operators sufficient to provide to Contractor the same protection from liability for loss or damage that would be afforded to Contractor under this Agreement as if Owner were the sole owner or operator.
13.3 Trespass . . Contractor shall be solely responsible for any act of trespass or any injury to adjacent third party property, resulting from or in connection with Contractor's performance of the Work. Contractor shall be liable for any claims that may arise from Contractor's deposit of debris of any kind upon adjacent property.
13.4 Intellectual Property Rights Infringement Indemnity . . Contractor warrants that none of the Work performed by Contractor, or the documents, goods or equipment produced, designed, fabricated, or assembled by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement infringe upon or violate any patent, copyright, trade secret, or any other intellectual or proprietary rights of any third party. If any third party makes a claim or commences a proceeding against Owner regarding the Work, alleging such an infringement or violation, then subject to this Article 13.4 , Contractor shall indemnify, defend and save harmless Owner, its directors, officers, employees, agents and affiliates from and against all damages and costs incurred by or awarded against Owner (including court costs and reasonable attorney's fees). Contractor agrees to include, as a term or condition of each purchase order employed by it in the performance of the Work, a patent indemnification provision extending from the Subcontractor under such purchase order to Owner and Contractor and to render such assistance to Owner as may be reasonably required on a Reimbursable Cost basis to enforce the terms of such indemnification by such Subcontractors. Owner will notify Contractor if any such claim is made or proceeding is commenced. Owner may, at its option, be represented by separate legal counsel in any such claim or proceeding, however, Contractor shall not be obligated to reimburse Owner the costs and expenses incurred by Owner in being so represented. If the use of any of the Work, or the results of such Work, or documents, goods, or equipment, or any part thereof, furnished under this Agreement in
42
connection with the Work is held in any such claim or proceeding to constitute an infringement and/or is enjoined, whether temporarily or permanently, Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, do any of the following (the selection of which shall be at the sole discretion of the Contractor):
(a) Procure for Owner the right to use the Work or results of such Work or such documents, goods and equipment; or
(b) Replace the Work or the results of such Work or such documents, goods, or equipment with non-infringing Work, documents, goods or equipment having the equivalent functionality as the infringing or allegedly infringing Work, documents, goods or equipment; or
(c) Modify such Work, documents, goods, or equipment so as to make them non-infringing, but equivalent in functionality.
13.5 Owner's Use of Drawings and Specifications. . Drawings and specifications prepared by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement, which Owner may require Contractor to supply in accordance with the Agreement, shall become the property of Owner, and Owner agrees to use the information contained therein solely for the purpose of facilitating or completing construction, maintenance, operation, modification and repair of the Facility (and not for duplication of the Facility, in whole or part) and agrees not to disclose the same or information contained therein to third parties (other than employees, agents or consultants of Owner) for any other purpose, without written notification to Contractor. In the event Owner uses such information for any other purpose, Owner agrees to release, defend, indemnify and hold Contractor harmless from and against any liability arising out of claims or suits asserted against Contractor even though such claims or suits may be based on allegations of negligence of Contractor. Nothing herein shall be construed as limiting Contractor's ownership of all rights to use its basic know-how, experience and skills, whether or not acquired during performance of the Work or to perform any engineering design or other Work for any other party.
13.6 Consequential Damages . . Contractor shall not be held responsible for consequential, incidental, special or indirect damages, including without limitation, liability for loss of use of the Facility, or Owner's existing property, loss of profits, interest, product or business interruption, increased costs of operations and maintenance or staffing needs, however the same may be caused. The waiver in this Article does not apply to the indemnity obligations of Contractor for any third party claims that may arise under Article 13.1.
13.7 Limitation of Liability . . Except for [*], Contractor's aggregate liability to Owner arising from this Agreement and the Work shall in no event exceed [*], and Owner releases Contractor from any liability and damages in excess of such amount. Contractor shall have no obligation to Owner with respect to any damage or loss to property caused by the perils of war, insurrection, revolution, nuclear reaction, or other like perils as may be excluded under the scope and limits of the insurance coverage provided pursuant to Article 15.2 . To the extent allowed by Applicable Law and except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement, indemnities against, releases from, assumptions of and limitations of liability expressed in this Agreement, as well as waivers of subrogation rights, shall apply even in the event of the fault, negligence or strict
43
liability of the Party indemnified or released or whose liability is limited or assumed or against whom rights of subrogation are waived and shall extend to the officers, directors, employees, licensors, agents, partners and related entitles of such Party and its partners and related entities.
ARTICLE 14
DRUG, ALCOHOL, SAFETY
AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
14.1 Drug and Alcohol Policy . . During the term of the Agreement, Contractor is required to have in place, and comply with a drug and alcohol policy that meets or exceeds the requirements and procedures contained in Owner's drug and alcohol policy, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit J . Owner's policy description states: "It is the policy of the Owner to provide a work environment that is free from the use, consumption, possession, sale or distribution of illegal drugs or alcohol and from the misuse of legal drugs on the Owner's premises, including vehicles used on Owner business. Accordingly, the Owner requires that employees and contractors alike will be subject to testing to determine the presence of illegal drugs, alcohol or inappropriately used legal drugs while performing Owner business. Consumption of alcohol during employee breaks or lunch is strictly prohibited. Employees must be fit for duty and not be under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances (without a valid prescription for the controlled substances) when employees present for Owner duty and at all times while at work or on duty or when on Company Premises." Contractor's policy shall include: reasonable testing procedures, full compliance with all Department of Transportation requirements for covered functions. Further, Contractor is responsible for testing and other related costs, for providing all required reports to any government agency, and, at Owner's request, Contractor shall make its Policy and drug/alcohol testing statistics available to Owner's drug and alcohol testing program administrators as identified by Owner from time to time.
14.2 Safety Materials . . Contractor agrees and warrants that all materials supplied by Contractor and articles and/or Work provided by Contractor in connection with the Work meet the safety standards established and promulgated under the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and, if applicable, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act, or under any Applicable Law of a state in lieu thereof, for the protection of employees who will be affected by the use or performance of said articles and/or Work. Contractor shall comply with all federal, state, and local rules and regulations governing safety and the safe operation of commercial motor vehicles and the safe performance of the Work.
14.3 Safety Precautions . . Contractor shall be solely responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety precautions and programs concerning the performance of the Work in accordance with all Applicable Laws. Contractor shall provide and be directly responsible for its own safety program for its employees and for the safe operation of its own vehicles and equipment. Contractor shall furnish Owner with a copy of its Safety Manual which has been compiled and designed for the Facility. Contractor shall comply with its own safety manual.
14.3.1 In carrying out its responsibilities according to the Contract Documents, Contractor shall (a) protect the lives and health of employees performing the Work and other persons who may be affected by the Work; and shall erect and maintain all reasonable safeguards for such safety and protection; (b) prevent
44
damage to materials, supplies, and equipment whether on-site or stored off-site; (c) prevent damage to other property at the Site or adjacent thereto; and (d) notify Owner's Project Manager when prosecution of the Work may affect owners of adjacent properties and utilities.
14.3.2 Accident Reporting. In case of an accident involving Contractor and the Work, a written notice shall be prepared by Contractor and one copy thereof given to Owner within twenty-four (24) hours of the occurrence of the accident. Verbal notification of any serious or fatal injuries shall be provided within three (3) hours of the injury.
14.3.3 In the event Owner has a reasonable objection to any employee of Contractor, Contractor shall investigate and take appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including removal of the employee from Owner's premises.
14.4.1 No Hazardous Materials to Be Brought on to Site. Contractor shall not, nor shall it permit or allow any Subcontractor to bring Hazardous Materials on the Site and shall bear all responsibility and liability for such materials; provided, however, that Contractor and its Subcontractors may bring onto the Site such Hazardous Materials as are necessary to perform the Work so long as the same is done in compliance with Applicable Laws and Contractor shall remain responsible and strictly liable for the management, transportation, treatment and disposal of all such Hazardous Materials. Contractor shall notify Owner prior to bringing any Hazardous Materials on to the Site and shall provide Owner's Project Manager (or his designated representative), the following information with respect to any Hazardous Materials: (a) material safety data sheet ("MSDS"), (b) quantity (volume/mass), (c) length of time on Site, (d) container type; and (e) disposal location if disposed or otherwise managed. Contractor shall require all Subcontractors and suppliers to provide the information required under this sub-article to Owner prior to bringing any Hazardous Materials to the Site. Contractor shall exclude the use of lead paint and material containing asbestos and Contractor shall minimize the use of acetone and chlorinated solvents and similar substances at the Site, and shall require all Subcontractors and suppliers to adhere to the same restrictions.
14.4.2 Indemnification . Contractor hereby indemnifies and agrees to defend and hold Owner harmless from any and all loss, liability, claim, cause of action, suit, damage, cost, attorney fee, or expense arising out of the existence, handling, treatment, storage, removal, remediation, avoidance, or other appropriate action (if any), with respect to any Hazardous Materials that (a) were brought or caused to be brought on the Site by Contractor and released to the environment by any act or omission of Contractor or any Subcontractor in the course of performance of the Work or (b) were the result of any willful or unlawful act or omission of Contractor or any Subcontractor.
45
14.4.3 Discovery of Hazardous Materials at Site.. If, during the course of the performance of the Work, Contractor or any Subcontractor discovers, or reasonably believes it has discovered in, on or under any part of the Site, any Hazardous Materials (other than Hazardous Materials that Contractor or a Subcontractor has brought onto the Site, generated or produced by Contractor (or its Subcontractors) from materials brought to the Site by Contractor (or its Subcontractors), Contractor shall promptly advise Owner and shall follow Owner's direction with respect to such Hazardous Materials. Owner shall undertake the abatement and disposal of any Hazardous Materials existing at the Site which are encountered by Contractor in the performance of the Work, and dispose of waste generated by the Facility during start-up, testing and operation of the Facility.
14.4.3.1 Contractor's costs resulting from its compliance with Owner's direction pursuant to this Article 14.4.3 shall be Reimbursable Costs and, subject to inclusion in a Change Order that adjusts the Target Price, included in the Contract Sum. In general, Owner is responsible for the cost and actions necessary for removing Hazardous Materials not brought onto the Site by Contractor (or its Subcontractors) or not generated or produced by Contractor (or its Subcontractors) from materials brought to the Site by Contractor (or its Subcontractors).
14.4.3.2 To the extent Contractor encounters Hazardous Materials not introduced by Contractor, Contractor shall use reasonable efforts to minimize the consequences to the Work Progress Schedule of dealing with such Hazardous Materials.
14.4.3.3 Owner has disclosed or shall promptly disclose to Contractor as information becomes available (i) any reports, test results, public records and other sources of information known to Owner which show areas of Contamination at the Site and (ii) any other information related to the condition of the Site. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, title to, ownership of, and legal responsibility and liability for any Contamination shall remain with Owner. Owner shall, at Owner's sole expense and risk, arrange for handling, storage, transportation, treatment and delivery for disposal of Contamination. Owner shall be solely responsible for obtaining a disposal site for such material. Contractor shall not have or exert any control over Owner in Owner's obligations or responsibilities as a generator in the storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of any Contamination. Owner shall complete and execute, in accordance with Applicable Law, any required governmental forms relating to regulated activities, including, but not limited to, generation, storage, handling, treatment, transportation, or disposal of Contamination. In the event that Contractor executes or completes any required governmental forms relating to regulated activities, including, but not
46
limited to, storage, generation, treatment, transportation, handling or disposal of Hazardous Materials (other than in connection with Contractor's responsibilities under Article 14.4.1 ), Contractor shall be and be deemed to have acted as Owner's agent. Owner shall indemnify, release and hold Contractor, its Affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, agents and employees harmless from all costs, liability, damages and penalties assessed against or paid by Owner or Contractor resulting from Contamination.
14.4.4 Contractor's Responsibility . . Contractor shall be responsible for the handling, management, treatment, storage, removal, remediation, avoidance, or other appropriate action (if any), with respect to any Hazardous Materials present at, on, in or under, or migrating and/or emanating to or from the Site, that: (a) were brought or caused to be brought on the Site and released to the environment by any act or omission of Contractor or any Subcontractor in the course of performance of the Work; (b) were brought to the Site or caused to be brought to the Site by Owner for Contractor's use in the performance of the Work and that are released to the environment by any act or omission of Contractor or any Subcontractor in the course of performance of the Work; or (c) were the result of any willful or intentional act of Contractor or any Subcontractor. Notwithstanding the provisions of clause (a) of this Article 14.4.4 , Contractor shall not be liable for any Hazardous Materials brought, or caused to be brought, to the Site by Contractor that are released to the environment by the willful or intentional act or omission of Owner.
15.1 Contractor's Insurance. . Prior to commencement of the Work, Contractor shall obtain the insurance set forth below and all insurance that may be required under the applicable laws, ordinances and regulations of any governmental authority. Contractor shall furnish to Owner a completed certificate of insurance coverage and which specifically requires thirty (30) calendar days prior notice to Owner of cancellation, termination or any material change of any such insurance policy. Review of the Contractor's insurance by Owner shall not relieve or increase the liability of Contractor.
15.2 Coverage . . Without limiting any of the liabilities or other obligations of Contractor under this Agreement, including but not limited to Article 13 "Liability" , Contractor shall obtain and maintain in effect, with forms and insurers acceptable to Owner, until all the obligations under this Agreement are satisfied, the following insurance policies providing coverage protecting against claims for personal and bodily injury or death, as well as claims for third party property damage which may arise from operations in connection with the Work whether such operations are by Contractor or any Subcontractor:
(a) Worker's Compensation Insurance. To cover obligations imposed by federal and state statutes pertaining to Contractor's employees engaged in the
47
performance of any Work, and Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000).
(b) Commercial General Liability Insurance , or the equivalent, with a limit of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence. This project specific policy shall include coverage for bodily injury liability, broad form property damage liability, blanket contractual, Contractor's protective, products liability and completed operations. The Owner Parties are to be added as additional insureds with respect to this project specific policy.
(c) Business Automobile Liability Insurance , or the equivalent, with limit of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per accident with respect to Contractor's vehicles whether owned, hired, or non-owned, assigned to or used in the performance of any Work required to be performed by Contractor pursuant to the Contract Documents.
(d) Excess Liability. Excess Liability Insurance covering claims in excess of the underlying insurance described in paragraphs (a) (with respect to only Employers Liability Insurance) and (c) (with respect to Business Automobile Liability Insurance) with a limit per occurrence of $13,000,000. The amounts of insurance required in the foregoing paragraphs (a) and (c) and this excess insurance section (d) may be satisfied by purchasing coverage in the amounts specified or by any combination of primary and excess insurance, so long as the total amount of insurance meets the requirements specified above.
(e) Endorsements and Other Requirements.
(1) Waiver of Subrogation . Insurers shall waive all rights of subrogation against Owner, Owner's officers, directors, agents and employees, as well as Owner's parents and affiliated or associated companies and each of their respective officers, directors, agents and employees, the Contractor and, where required by contract, any other party as requested by Owner or Contractor.
(2) Severability of Interest . The liability insurance specified in paragraph (b) of this Article 15.2 shall state that, with respect to coverage of more than one insured, all terms conditions, insuring, agreements and endorsements, with the exception of limits of liability, shall operate in the same manner as if there were a separate policy covering each insured.
(3) Primary and Non-Contributory . The liability insurance specified in paragraph (b) of this Article 15.2 by the Contractor shall be primary insurance. Any other insurance carried by the Owner shall be excess and not contributory with respect to the insurance required hereunder.
15.3 Subcontractors. . Contractor shall require that each Subcontractor maintain normal and customary insurance typically obtained from such Subcontractors by Contractor, and such additional insurance as agreed to by Contractor and Owner.
48
(a) Builder's Risk. Owner shall provide standard form "All Risk" Builder's Risk or Installation Insurance covering 100% of the replacement value of existing property (or to such other amount to the extent commercially available) and all property built or installed along with any and all materials, equipment and machinery intended for the Site during off-site storage and inland transit. Coverage shall contain an agreed amount endorsement waiving any coinsurance penalty. Such insurance shall be for the benefit of Owner, Contractor, Owner's other contractors and Contractor's Subcontractors, covering physical loss or damage to the Facility and the Work. Coverage shall include fire, explosion, extended coverage, expediting expense, collapse, earthquake, flood, and boiler and machinery (including electrical injury and mechanical breakdown). There shall be no exclusion for resultant damage caused by faulty workmanship, design or materials. Coverage shall contain no exclusions for testing. The coverage shall provide for deductibles that are no greater than $100,000 for general losses, $250,000 for losses resulting from testing; $500,000 for losses resulting from the testing of the steam turbine generator and $1,000,000 for losses resulting from the testing of the combustion turbine generator.
(b) Property Insurance. From and after the date of Substantial Completion, Owner shall maintain appropriate property insurance for the Facility and Owners property at the Site, which shall name Contractor as an additional insured for the period ending twelve (12) months after Substantial Completion and which shall include a waiver of rights of subrogation against Contractor, its Affiliates, and their vendors and Subcontractors. Nothing in this Article 15.4(b), however, shall require Owner to provide insurance covering Contractor's warranty obligations hereunder.
ARTICLE 16
OWNERSHIP OF PLANS AND CONFIDENTIALITY
16.1 Title to plans and specifications. . All models, drawings, specifications, technical data, and other documents and information furnished to Contractor by Owner or prepared by Contractor as a deliverable to Owner (as described in Exhibit A ) are confidential and proprietary to Owner, are and shall remain the property of Owner, cannot be copied or otherwise reproduced or used in any way, except in connection with the Work, and cannot be disclosed by Contractor to any third party (other than Subcontractors for purposes of performing the Work) or used in any manner detrimental to the interests of Owner. The Parties agree that they will use the above described documents and information solely for the purposes of this Facility, including its design, construction, procurement, maintenance, operation, modification and repair. The Parties agree not to use the above referenced documents and information for other projects or for purposes unrelated to the Facility. If either Party misuses the documents and information in breach of this Article 16.1 , then that Party shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the non-breaching Party from all claims asserted against the non-breaching Party arising out of such misuse. Nothing in the Article shall be construed as limiting Contractor's ownership of all rights
49
to use its basic know-how, experience and skills, whether or not acquired during performance of the Work or to perform any engineering design or Work for any other party. Also, nothing in this Article shall prohibit Owner from using Owner furnished information on other projects or for other uses.
16.2 Confidentiality . . A Party (the "Disclosing Party") may furnish to the other Party (the "Receiving Party") information marked "Confidential" including but not limited to plans, drawings, specifications and procedures for use as required in the performance of the Work. The Receiving Party agrees to keep confidential and not to disclose to third parties (other than its Subcontractors, employees, agents and consultants who are associated with the Facility) the information so disclosed by the Disclosing Party (as well as all information disclosed by Contractor in connection with its proposal to Owner for the Work) without the prior written consent of the Disclosing Party, provided, such restrictions shall not apply to (1) information in the Receiving Party's possession or known to it prior to its receipt from the Disclosing Party, (2) information that is independently developed by the Receiving Party without the utilization of such confidential information of the Disclosing Party, (3) information that is or becomes public knowledge without the fault of the Receiving Party, (4) information that is or becomes available to the Receiving Party from a source other than the Disclosing Party, so long as the Receiving Party reasonably believes such source is lawfully entitled to disclose such information, and (5) information that is or becomes available on an unrestricted basis to a third party from the Disclosing Party or from someone acting under its control. Such restrictions on use and disclosure shall expire on the fifth year anniversary following the date received by the Receiving Party. Further, such restrictions shall not apply to any information that must be disclosed by the Receiving Party as required by law.
ARTICLE 17
UNCONTROLLABLE FORCES
17.1 Uncontrollable Forces . . Neither Party shall be considered to be in default in respect to any obligation hereunder, if delays in or failure of performance shall be due to Uncontrollable Forces. "Uncontrollable Forces" shall mean any event that adversely affects or prevents any Party (including such Party's subcontractors) from performing any of its obligations in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, other than payment of money, but only if and to the extent that such events and circumstances are not within the affected Party's reasonable control and are not due to its fault or negligence. So long as the foregoing conditions are met, an Uncontrollable Force shall, include, but is not limited to, acts of God, earthquake, storm, fire, flood, explosions, accidents, lightning, epidemic, war, riot, acts of the public enemy; act of war (declared or undeclared), hostilities, acts of terrorism or threats of terrorism; rebellion or sabotage or damage resulting therefrom; expropriation or confiscation of facilities; civil disturbance, sabotage; changes in law; compliance with any order or request of any governmental authority, inability to obtain permits, licenses, and authorizations from any local, state, or federal agency or person for any of the materials, supplies, equipment, or Work required to be provided hereunder, fuel shortages; breakdown or damage to generation and transmission facilities belonging to Owner; failure of facilities; strikes or other labor disturbances (excluding however, strikes or labor actions of Contractor's employees taking place at the Site unless (i) the event at the Site is itself part of a regional or national action that is not directed specifically and
50
solely at Contractor, (ii) the event is of a political nature or (iii) the strike is in breach or violation of any applicable national, federal, industry or national supplementary labor or union agreement applicable in the construction industry); and restraint by court or public authority. Nothing contained herein, however, shall be construed to require either Party to prevent or settle a strike or other labor dispute against its will. The Party whose performance hereunder is so affected shall immediately notify the other Party of all pertinent facts and take all reasonable steps to promptly and diligently prevent such causes if feasible to do so, or to minimize or eliminate the effect thereof without delay. Contractor's Target Price, Contract Completion Date and other affected obligations shall be adjusted to account for any Uncontrollable Forces and Contractor shall be reimbursed by Owner under Article 4 for all costs incurred in connection with or arising from Uncontrollable Forces, including, but not limited to, those costs incurred in the exercise of reasonable diligence to avoid or mitigate Uncontrollable Forces. To the extent practicable under the circumstances, Contractor and Owner shall confer on any alternative mitigation plans, including the relative costs and benefits of those plans, and Contractor shall implement the mitigation plan authorized by Owner.
18.1 EEO Clauses and Executive Orders. . Owner is an equal opportunity employer. Pursuant to Executive Orders 11246, 11625, 11701, and 11758, as amended or superseded, in whole or in part from time to time, and all regulations issued thereunder, it is agreed that all applicable laws, rules, and regulations are incorporated by reference in this Agreement and bind Contractor as a contractor of Owner. Contractor further agrees to follow all federal, state, and local non-discrimination and other employment laws, regulations, rules and ordinances.
18.2 Assignment. . This Agreement and all provisions hereof shall inure to and be binding upon the respective Parties, their successors, and assigns. Since Contractor was selected to perform the Work covered by this Agreement based on its professional qualifications, among other considerations, Contractor shall not assign this Agreement or any part hereof without the prior written consent of each of the Owner Parties. Each Owner Party shall have the right to assign its interests in this Agreement without Contractor's consent. Each Owner Party shall promptly notify Contractor in writing of any such assignment, unless such assignment is to an affiliate of such Owner Party because of the reorganization of the assets, business function or structure of such Owner Party. In the event an Owner Party assigns any portion of its interests in this Agreement, the assigning Owner Party shall not be relieved of its financial responsibility related to the portion of this Agreement so assigned unless Contractor's consent is obtained, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be assigned without consent to the successor of either Party, or to a person, firm or corporation acquiring all or substantially all of the business assets of such Party or to a wholly owned subsidiary of either Party.
18.3 Independent Contractor . . In performing the Work, Contractor is acting and shall be deemed for all purposes to be an independent contractor. Owner and Contractor are not partners, agents or joint ventures with each other, and this Agreement is not intended to nor shall it be construed to create a partnership, joint venture, or agency relationship between Owner and
51
Contractor. Contractor shall complete the Work according to Contractor's own procedures, techniques, sequences, means and methods of work, which shall be in the exclusive charge and control of Contractor, and which shall not be subject to the control and supervision of Owner, except as to the results of the Work. Contractor shall be entirely and solely responsible for its acts and the acts of its employees and agents while engaged in the performance of the Work. Except as allowed by this Agreement, Contractor, its employees and agents shall not hold themselves out as employees or agents of Owner. Contractor and its employees are hereby expressly precluded from and not entitled to any employee benefits from any Owner Party. For the purpose of clarifying the ineligibility of the Contractor under Owner's employee benefits plans or programs, Contractor and its employees are hereby specifically excluded from any eligibility and/or are deemed a "temporary employee" when such term is used to define ineligibility in benefits in any Owner Party's employee benefit plan or program.
18.4 No Waiver . . No term, covenant or condition of the Contract Documents or any breach thereof shall be deemed waived, unless such waiver shall be in writing and executed by the Party claimed to have waived the same. The waiver of any breach by a Party, whether express or implied, shall not constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach.
18.5 Gratuities . . Contractor shall not, under any circumstances, extend any gratuity or special favor to employees of Owner that might be reasonably construed as an attempt to influence the recipients in the conduct of their official duties.
18.6 Severability . . If a court or regulatory agency having jurisdiction over the Parties determines that a condition of this Agreement, or any part thereof, is void, illegal or unenforceable, said condition or part shall be deemed to have been severed from this Agreement, and the remaining conditions, or parts, shall be unaffected and shall be enforced to the fullest extent allowed by law. In the event that any portion or all of this Agreement is held to be void or unenforceable, the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to amend the commercial and other terms of this Agreement in order to effect the intent of the parties as set forth in this Agreement.
18.7 Governing Law . . This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of New Mexico, without regard to the conflicts of law rules of that State.
18.8 Fair Labor Standards Act . . Contractor warrants that any products purchased pursuant to this Agreement have been produced, and that all Work and all wages, hours and other forms or compensation have been provided, in compliance with the requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended and regulations and orders pursuant thereto issued by the U.S. Department of Labor.
18.9 New Mexico Preference.. Contractor shall strive to perform the Work by using a minimum of fifty percent (50%) New Mexico labor and subcontracts. This is a goal, and not a guaranty or contractual commitment. In its monthly reports to Owner, Contractor shall provide an update on the status of meeting this goal.
18.10 Counterparts . . This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. Owner may retain a duplicate copy ( e.g. , electronic imager, photocopy, facsimile) of this Agreement, which shall be considered an equivalent to this original.
52
18.11 Entire Agreement . . The Contract Documents represent the entire agreement and understanding between the Owner Parties and Contractor with respect to the subject matter hereof and performance of the Work, and supercede any prior understandings, representations or agreements, whether verbal or written, prior to execution of this Agreement. If any Work has been performed by Contractor under verbal agreement or under a limited notice to proceed prior to the execution of this Agreement, then this Agreement shall apply thereto in the same manner as if made before such Work were performed. Headings and titles of Articles , Sections, paragraphs and other subparts of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and shall not be considered in interpreting the text of this Agreement. Modifications or amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by a duly authorized representative of each Party. Contractor makes no representations, covenants, warranties, or guarantees, express or implied, other than those expressly set forth herein. The Parties' rights, liabilities, responsibilities and remedies with respect to the Work, the Work and this Agreement shall be exclusively those expressly set forth in this Agreement. The Contract Documents set forth the full and complete understanding of the Parties as of the date first above stated, and it supersedes any and all agreements and representations made or dated prior thereto, including the Preliminary Services Agreement, entered into by the Parties on December 3, 2004, as amended. The Parties agree, however, that the amounts paid by Owner pursuant to such Preliminary Services Agreement, as amended, shall be included in the Contract Sum and chargeable against the Target Price under the Agreement. In the event of conflict between the Contract Documents and any of the Exhibits hereto, the terms and provisions of the Contract Documents shall control. In the event of any conflict among the Exhibits, the Exhibit of the latest date shall control.
18.12 Agreement Authors . . This Agreement has been agreed to by the Parties and no ambiguity shall be construed against any Party based on the identity of the author or authors of this Agreement. THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT HAVE BEEN FREELY, FAIRLY AND THOROUGHLY NEGOTIATED. FURTHER, THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE RELATING TO WAIVERS, ALLOCATIONS OF, RELEASES FROM, INDEMNITIES AGAINST AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY, WHICH MAY REQUIRE CONSPICUOUS IDENTIFICATION, HAVE NOT BEEN SO IDENTIFIED BY MUTUAL AGREEMENT AND THE PARTIES HAVE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE INTENT AND EFFECT OF SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS. EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IN EXECUTING THIS AGREEMENT THEY RELY SOLELY ON THEIR OWN JUDGMENT, BELIEF, AND KNOWLEDGE, AND SUCH ADVICE AS THEY MAY HAVE RECEIVED FROM THEIR OWN COUNSEL, AND THEY HAVE NOT BEEN INFLUENCED BY ANY REPRESENTATION OR STATEMENTS MADE BY ANY OTHER PARTY OR ITS COUNSEL. NO PROVISION IN THIS AGREEMENT IS TO BE INTERPRETED FOR OR AGAINST ANY PARTY BECAUSE THAT PARTY OR ITS COUNSEL DRAFTED SUCH PROVISION.
53
18.13 Survival of Obligations . . The provisions of this Agreement which by their nature are intended to survive the termination, cancellation, completion or expiration of the Agreement, including but not limited to any expressed limitations of or releases from liability, shall continue as valid and enforceable obligations of the parties notwithstanding any such termination, cancellation, completion or expiration. Specifically, Contractor's warranty obligations under Article 6 "Inspection & Warranty" and indemnity obligations, including those under Articles 4, 13, 14 and 17 "Compensation", "Liability", "Drug, Alcohol Safety and Hazardous Materials" , and "Other Provisions", respectively, of this Agreement, and all other warranty and performance obligations, guaranties, and indemnity obligations in the Contract Documents shall survive any termination of the Agreement, and the suspension, completion and acceptance of the Work, or any part thereof, or final payment to Contractor, it being agreed that said obligations and rights are and shall be of a continuing nature. The terms of Article 12 "Dispute Resolution" shall also survive termination, suspension and completion of this Agreement.
18.14 No Third Party Beneficiaries. . There are no third party beneficiaries to this Agreement and no third person or entity shall claim that any portion of this Agreement creates a duty running to that third person or entity. The parties agree to look solely to each other with respect to the obligations and liability arising in connection with this Agreement and the Work performed hereunder. This Agreement and each and every provision hereof is for the exclusive benefit of Owner and Contractor and not for the benefit of any third party, except to the extent such benefits have been expressly extended pursuant to this Agreement.
18.15 Liability of Owner Parties . . The Owner Parties are Phelps Dodge Energy Services, LLC, PNMR Development and Management Corporation, and Tucson Electric Power Company ("TEP"), each of which shall be jointly and severally liable for the obligations of Owner under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , Contractor and Owner have caused this Agreement to be executed on their behalves by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first set forth above.
FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC. |
PNMR DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
|
By: /s/ Robert Mickey |
By: /s/ Hugh W. Smith |
Printed name: Robert Mickey |
Printed name: Hugh W. Smith |
Its: Senior Vice President |
Its: President |
TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY |
PHELPS DODGE ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
|
By: /s/ Michael J. DeConcini |
By: /s/ Choi Lee |
Printed name: Michael J. DeConcini |
Printed name: Choi Lee |
Its: Senior Vice President |
Its: Vice President |
54
As reported in the Company's 2005 Proxy Statement, the existing Director Retainer Plan will expire on July 1, 2005. If approved by shareholders, the Director Retainer Plan will be replaced by the Amended and Restated Omnibus Performance Equity Plan ("PEP") which will permit non-employee directors to be eligible for awards under the PEP. Upon shareholder approval, director compensation will include the following stock options and restricted stock units issued under the PEP. The following terms were approved by the Board in its February 2005 meeting. If the PEP is not approved by shareholders, the Directors would be not be able to receive the equity portion of the retainer as proposed for 2005 and, consequently, would need to consider an alternative retainer structure. The Directors have not yet considered an alternative retainer if the PEP is not approved by shareholders.
Annual Retainer : |
$35,000, 1,050 stock options* and 1,050 restricted stock rights* |
|
Annual Committee Chair Fee : |
$ 4,000 (in addition to meeting attendance fees) |
|
|
||
Attendance Fees : |
$ 0 per Board meeting
|
*The options and restricted stock rights will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant. The exercise price of the stock option is equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Fair market value is determined by the closing price of the NYSE on the date of the grant.
Directors are also reimbursed for any Board-related expenses.
Exhibit 12.1 | |
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
(1,000'S) |
Line |
YTD |
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
No. |
3/31/05 |
12/31/04 |
12/31/03 |
12/31/02 |
12/31/01 |
12/31/00 |
|||||||
Fixed charges, as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission: |
|||||||||||||
1 |
Interest on Long-term Debt |
$11,765 |
$46,702 |
$ 59,429 |
$ 56,409 |
$ 62,716 |
$ 62,823 |
||||||
2 |
Amortization of Debt Premium, Discount and Expenses |
762 |
2,697 |
2,838 |
2,302 |
2,346 |
2,037 |
||||||
3 |
Other Interest |
1,360 |
2,319 |
5,423 |
2,859 |
(42) |
752 |
||||||
4 |
Estimated Interest Factor of Lease Rental Charges |
4,919 |
19,617 |
20,452 |
23,233 |
22,856 |
19,716 |
||||||
5 |
Total Fixed Charges |
$18,806 |
$ 71,335 |
$ 88,142 |
$ 84,803 |
$ 87,876 |
$ 85,328 |
||||||
Earnings, as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission: |
|||||||||||||
6 |
Consolidated Net Earnings from Continuing Operations |
$30,641 |
$ 88,258 |
$ 59,138 |
$ 64,272 |
$ 150,433 |
$ 100,946 |
||||||
7 |
Income Taxes |
17,275 |
49,247 |
27,889 |
33,032 |
81,063 |
74,345 |
||||||
8 |
Add Fixed Charges as Above |
18,806 |
71,335 |
88,142 |
84,803 |
87,876 |
85,328 |
||||||
9 |
Earnings Available for Fixed Charges |
$66,722 |
$208,840 |
$ 175,169 |
$ 182,107 |
$ 319,372 |
$ 260,619 |
||||||
10 |
Ratio for Earnings to Fixed Charges |
3.55 |
2.93 |
1.99 |
2.15 |
3.63 |
3.05 |
||||||
PNM RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
Exhibit 12.2 |
Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |
|
(1,000'S) |
EXHIBIT 15.1
May 3, 2005
PNM Resources, Inc.
Albuquerque, New Mexico
We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of PNM Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, as indicated in our report dated May 2, 2005; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-10993-99, 333-100186, 333-106080, 333-106054, 333-121059 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-03303-99, 333-03289-99, 333-61598-99, 333-76316, 333-76288, 333-88372, 333-100184, 333-113684, and 333-121371 on Form S-8.
We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.
/s/ DELOITEE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, California
EXHIBIT 15.2
May 3, 2005
Public Service
Company of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico
We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of Public Service Company of New Mexico and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, as indicated in our report dated May 2, 2005; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-53367 and 333-106079 on Form S-3.
We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.
/s/ DELOITEE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, California
EXHIBIT 31.1
Certification
I, Jeffry E. Sterba, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of each of PNM Resources, Inc. and Public Service Company of New Mexico;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. Each registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for such registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to such registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of such registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in each registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during each registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (each registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, such registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. Each registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to such registrant's auditors and the audit committee of such registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect such registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in such registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 3, 2005
/s/ Jeffry E. Sterba |
Jeffry E. Sterba,
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
PNM Resources, Inc. and
Public Service Company of New Mexico
EXHIBIT 31.2
Certification
I, John R. Loyack, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of each of PNM Resources, Inc. and Public Service Company of New Mexico;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. Each registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for such registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to such registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of such registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in each registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during each registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (each registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, such registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. Each registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to such registrant's auditors and the audit committee of such registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect such registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in such registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 3, 2005
/s/ John R. Loyack |
John R. Loyack,
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
PNM Resources, Inc. and
Public Service Company of New Mexico
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, for each of PNM Resources, Inc. and Public Service Company of New Mexico ("Companies"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2005 ("Report"), I, Jeffry E. Sterba, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
Date: May 3, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Jeffry E. Sterba |
Jeffry E. Sterba |
||
Chairman, President and |
||
Chief Executive Officer |
[PNM Resources, Inc. logo]
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, for each of PNM Resources, Inc. and Public Service Company of New Mexico ("Companies"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2005 ("Report"), I, John R. Loyack, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
Date: March 1, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ John R. Loyack
|
John R. Loyack | ||
Senior Vice President and | ||
Chief Financial Officer |