UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended March 31, 2005

Commission File Number

Name of Registrant, State of Incorporation,
Address of Principal Executive Offices,
and Telephone Number

I.R.S. Employer
Identification
Number

001-31403

PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC.
  (Pepco Holdings or PHI), a Delaware corporation
701 Ninth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20068
Telephone: (202)872-2000

52-2297449

001-01072

POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
  (Pepco), a District of Columbia and
    Virginia corporation
701 Ninth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20068
Telephone: (202)872-2000

53-0127880

001-01405

DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
  (DPL), a Delaware and Virginia corporation
800 King Street, P.O. Box 231
Wilmington, Delaware 19899
Telephone: (202)872-2000

51-0084283

001-03559

ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY
  (ACE), a New Jersey corporation
800 King Street, P.O. Box 231
Wilmington, Delaware 19899
Telephone: (202)872-2000

21-0398280

Continued
________________________________________________________________________________

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Registrant

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered  

Pepco Holdings

Common Stock, $.01 par value

   New York Stock
   Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Pepco

Serial Preferred Stock, $50 par value

 

     Indicate by check mark whether each of the registrants (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes . No     .

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

   

Pepco Holdings

Yes     X        No        

   

Pepco

Yes                No     X  

   

DPL

Yes                No     X  

   

ACE

Yes                No     X  

     DPL and ACE meet the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and are therefore filing this Form 10-Q with reduced disclosure format specified in General Instruction H(2) of Form 10-Q.

           Registrant

Number of Shares of Common Stock of the Registrant Outstanding at March 31, 2005

          Pepco Holdings

188,786,679 ($.01 par value)

          Pepco

100 ($.01 par value) (a)

          DPL

1,000 ($2.25 par value) (b)

          ACE

8,546,017 ($3 par value) (b)

(a)

All voting and non-voting common equity is owned by Pepco Holdings.

(b)

All voting and non-voting common equity is owned by Conectiv, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pepco Holdings.

     THIS COMBINED FORM 10-Q IS SEPARATELY FILED BY PEPCO HOLDINGS, PEPCO, DPL, AND ACE. INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN RELATING TO ANY INDIVIDUAL REGISTRANT IS FILED BY SUCH REGISTRANT ON ITS OWN BEHALF. EACH REGISTRANT MAKES NO REPRESENTATION AS TO INFORMATION RELATING TO THE OTHER REGISTRANTS.

________________________________________________________________________________

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   

Page

 

Glossary of Terms

i

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

   Item 1.

-

Financial Statements

1

   Item 2.

-

Management's Discussion and Analysis of
   Financial Condition and Results of Operations

91

   Item 3.

-

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
   About Market Risk

155

   Item 4.

-

Controls and Procedures

158

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

 

   Item 1.

-

Legal Proceedings

160

   Item 2.

-

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

161

   Item 3.

-

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

161

   Item 4.

-

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

162

   Item 5.

-

Other Information

162

   Item 6.

-

Exhibits

166

   Signatures

184

________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS - EXHIBITS

Exh. No.

Registrant(s)

Description of Exhibit

Page

12.1

PHI

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

168

12.2

Pepco

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

169

12.3

DPL

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

170

12.4

ACE

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

171

31.1

PHI

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

172

31.2

PHI

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

173

31.3

Pepco

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

174

31.4

Pepco

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

175

31.5

DPL

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

176

31.6

DPL

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

177

31.7

ACE

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

178

31.8

ACE

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

179

32.1

PHI

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

180

32.2

Pepco

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

181

32.3

DPL

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

182

32.4

ACE

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

183

 

 

________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

            GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Term

Definition

ABO

Accumulated benefit obligation

ACE

Atlantic City Electric Company

ACE Funding

Atlantic City Electric Transition Funding LLC

AOCI

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

APB

Accounting Principles Board Opinion

APB No. 25

Accounting Principles Board Opinion "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees"

APBO

Accumulated Post-Retirement Benefit Obligation

Asset Purchase and
  Sale Agreement

Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2000 and subsequently amended, between Pepco and Mirant (formerly Southern Energy, Inc.) relating to the sale of Pepco's generation assets

Bankruptcy Court

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas

BGS

Basic Generation Service (the supply of electricity by ACE to retail customers in New Jersey who have not elected to purchase electricity from a competitive supplier)

BTP

Bondable Transition Property

Competitive Energy
  Business

Consists of the business operations of Conectiv Energy and Pepco Energy Services

Conectiv

A wholly owned subsidiary of PHI which is a PUHCA holding company and the parent of DPL and ACE

Conectiv Energy

Conectiv Energy Holding Company and its subsidiaries

DCPSC

District of Columbia Public Service Commission

Debentures

Junior Subordinated Debentures

Default Service

The supply of electricity by DPL to retail customers in Virginia who have not elected to purchase electricity from a competitive supplier

Default Electricity Supply

The supply of electricity within PHI's service territories at regulated rates to retail customers who do not elect to purchase electricity from a competitive supplier, and which, depending on the jurisdiction, is also known as Default Service, SOS, BGS, or POLR service

Default Supply Revenue

The generic term for revenue received from Default Electricity Supply

Delivery revenue

Revenue received for delivering energy to customers

District Court

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

DMEC

Delaware Municipal Electric Corporation

DPL

Delmarva Power & Light Company

DPSC

Delaware Public Service Commission

EITF

Emerging Issues Task Force

EPA

Environmental Protection Agency

ERISA

Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ESS

Electricity Supply Service

Exchange Act

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

FASB

Financial Accounting Standards Board

FERC

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

FIN 45

FASB Interpretation No. 45, entitled "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others"

i
________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Term

Definition

FIN 46

FASB Interpretation No. 46, entitled "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities"

FIN 46R

FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), entitled "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities"

FIN 47

FASB Interpretation No. 47 entitled "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations"

FirstEnergy

FirstEnergy Corp., formerly Ohio Edison

FirstEnergy PPA

PPAs between Pepco and FirstEnergy Corp. and Allegheny Energy, Inc.

GAAP

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America

GPC

Generation Procurement Credit

Internal Control over
  Financial Reporting

A process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

LTIP

Long-Term Incentive Plan

Mirant

Mirant Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries

Mirant Pre-Petition
  Obligations

Unpaid obligations of Mirant to Pepco existing at the time of filing of Mirant's bankruptcy petition consisting primarily of payments due Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations

MPSC

Maryland Public Service Commission

MTC

Market transition charge

NJBPU

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities

NJDEP

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

NUG

Non-utility generator

OCI

Other Comprehensive Income

OPC

Office of the People's Counsel

Other energy
  commodity activities

The competitive energy segments' commodity risk management and other energy market activities

Panda

Panda-Brandywine, L.P.

Panda PPA

PPA between Pepco and Panda

PCI

Potomac Capital Investment Corporation and its subsidiaries

Pepco

Potomac Electric Power Company

Pepco Energy Services

Pepco Energy Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries

Pepco Holdings or PHI

Pepco Holdings, Inc.

Pepco TPA Claim

Pepco's $105 million allowed, pre-petition general unsecured claim against Mirant

ii
________________________________________________________________________________________

Term

Definition

Pepcom

Pepco Communications, Inc.

PJM

PJM Interconnection, LLC

POLR

Provider of Last Resort service (the supply of electricity by DPL before May 1, 2006 to retail customers in Delaware who have not elected to purchase electricity from a competitive supplier)

Power Delivery

PHI's Power Delivery Businesses

PPA

Power Purchase Agreement

PPA-Related
  Obligations

Mirant's obligations to purchase from Pepco the capacity and energy that Pepco is obligated to purchase under the FirstEnergy PPA and the Panda PPA

PUHCA

Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935

RARC

Regulatory Asset Recovery Charge

Regulated electric
  revenues

Revenues for delivery (transmission and distribution) service and electricity supply service

SEC

Securities and Exchange Commission

Settlement Agreement

Amended Settlement Agreement and Release, dated as of October 24, 2003 between Pepco and the Mirant Parties

SFAS

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards

SFAS No. 13

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, entitled "Accounting for Leases"

SFAS No. 123

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, entitled "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation"

SFAS No. 123R

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, entitled "Share-Based Payment"

SFAS No. 131

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, entitled "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information"

SFAS No. 133

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, entitled "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities"

SFAS No. 143

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, entitled "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations"

SFAS No. 148

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, entitled "Accounting For Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure"

SFAS No. 150

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, entitled "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity"

SMECO

Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc.

SMECO Agreement

Capacity purchase agreement between Pepco and SMECO

SOS

Standard Offer Service (the supply of electricity by Pepco in the District of Columbia, by Pepco and DPL in Maryland and by DPL in Delaware on and after May 1, 2006, to retail customers who have not elected to purchase electricity from a competitive supplier)

Standard Offer Service
  revenue or SOS revenue

Revenue Pepco receives for the procurement of energy by Pepco for its SOS customers

Starpower

Starpower Communications, LLC

iii
________________________________________________________________________________________

Term

Definition

Stranded costs

Costs incurred by a utility in connection with providing service which would otherwise be unrecoverable in a competitive or restructured market. Such costs may include costs for generation assets, purchased power costs, and regulatory assets and liabilities, such as accumulated deferred income taxes.

TBC

Transition bond charge

T&D

Transmission and distribution

TPAs

Transition Power Agreements for Maryland and the District of Columbia between Pepco and Mirant

Transition Bonds

Transition bonds issued by ACE Funding

Treasury lock

A hedging transaction that allows a company to "lock-in" a specific interest rate corresponding to the rate of a designated Treasury bond for a determined period of time

VaR

Value at Risk

VSCC

Virginia State Corporation Commission

iv
________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 


________________________________________________________________________________________

 

PART I    FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 .    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

          Listed below is a table that sets forth, for each registrant, the page number where the information is contained herein.

 

                               Registrants                           

Item

Pepco
Holdings

Pepco

DPL

ACE

Consolidated Statements of Earnings

3

41

62

75

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings

4

N/A

N/A

N/A

Consolidated Balance Sheets

5

42

63

76

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

7

44

65

78

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

8

45

66

79

 

 

1
________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 

 

2
________________________________________________________________________________________

 

PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)

   

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
               

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions, except earnings per share)

 
                           

Operating Revenue

                         

  Power Delivery

           

$

1,104.7

 

$

1,039.2

   

  Competitive Energy

             

678.9

   

702.0

   

  Other

             

21.2

   

22.9

   

     Total Operating Revenue

             

1,804.8

   

1,764.1

   
                           

Operating Expenses

                         

  Fuel and purchased energy

             

1,087.9

   

1,067.0

   

  Other services cost of sales

             

170.6

   

160.9

   

  Other operation and maintenance

             

192.0

   

198.0

   

  Depreciation and amortization

105.7

112.8

  Other taxes

81.9

72.0

  Deferred electric service costs

19.0

15.0

  Gain on sale of assets

(.4

)

(12.1

)

     Total Operating Expenses

1,656.7

1,613.6

                           

Operating Income

             

148.1

   

150.5

   

Other Income (Expenses)

                         

  Interest and dividend income

             

2.0

   

1.2

   

  Interest expense

             

(82.8

)

 

(92.6

)

 

  Loss from equity investments

             

(1.1

)

 

(.4

)

 

  Other income

             

15.7

   

5.3

   

  Other expenses

             

(.7

)

 

(.7

)

 

     Total Other Expenses

(66.9

)

(87.2

)

Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements of Subsidiaries

             

.6

   

.7

   

Income Before Income Tax Expense

80.6

62.6

Income Tax Expense

             

34.1

   

11.4

   
                           

Income Before Extraordinary Item

             

46.5

   

51.2

   
                           

Extraordinary Item (net of tax of $6.2 million)

             

9.0

   

-

   
                           

Net Income

55.5

51.2

Retained Income at Beginning of Period

863.7

781.0

Dividends on Common Stock

(47.1

)

(42.9

)

Retained Income at End of Period

$

872.1

$

789.3

Basic and Diluted Share Information

                         

  Weighted average shares outstanding

             

188.4

   

171.8

   

  Earnings per share of common stock

                         

     Before extraordinary item

           

$

.24

 

$

.30

   

     Extraordinary item

             

.05

   

-

   

          Total

           

$

.29

 

$

.30

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

3
________________________________________________________________________________________

 

PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
(Unaudited)

   

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
               

2005

   

2004

   
     

    (Millions of Dollars)

 
                           

Net income

           

$

55.5

 

$

51.2

   
                           

Other comprehensive earnings, net of taxes

                         
                           

  Unrealized gains on commodity
    derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:

                         

      Unrealized holding gains arising during period

34.7

21.9

      Less: reclassification adjustment for
                gains included in net earnings

4.0

1.5

      Net unrealized gains on commodity derivatives

             

30.7

   

20.4

   

  Realized gain on Treasury lock

2.9

2.9

                           

  Unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swap
    agreements designated as cash flow hedges:

                         

      Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period

             

1.1

   

(9.0

)

 

      Less: reclassification adjustment for gains
                (losses) included in net earnings

             

.9

   

(.4

)

 

      Net unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swaps

             

.2

   

(8.6

)

 
                           

  Unrealized gains on marketable securities:

                         

      Unrealized holding gains arising during period

             

-

   

.3

   

      Less: reclassification adjustment for gains
                included in net earnings

-

-

      Net unrealized gains on marketable securities

-

.3

                           

  Other comprehensive earnings, before taxes

33.8

15.0

  Income tax expense

13.6

6.6

                           

Other comprehensive earnings, net of taxes

             

20.2

   

8.4

   

Comprehensive earnings

$

75.7

$

59.6

                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

4
________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

   

March 31,

December 31,

 

ASSETS

             

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of Dollars)

 

CURRENT ASSETS

                         

  Cash and cash equivalents

           

$

43.4

 

$

29.6

   

  Restricted cash

             

35.3

   

42.0

   

  Accounts receivable, less allowance for
    uncollectible accounts of $46.1 million
    and $43.7 million, respectively

             

1,140.5

   

1,126.9

   

  Fuel, materials and supplies-at average cost

             

244.3

   

268.4

   

  Unrealized gains - derivative contracts

             

118.7

   

90.3

   

  Prepaid expenses and other

             

134.1

   

119.6

   

    Total Current Assets

             

1,716.3

   

1,676.8

   
                           

INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS

                         

  Goodwill

             

1,431.3

   

1,430.5

   

  Regulatory assets

             

1,285.9

   

1,335.4

   

  Investment in finance leases held in trust

             

1,237.3

   

1,218.7

   

  Prepaid pension expense

             

160.7

   

165.7

   

  Other

             

473.5

   

466.1

   

    Total Investments and Other Assets

             

4,588.7

   

4,616.4

   
                           

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

                         

  Property, plant and equipment

             

11,084.7

   

11,045.2

   

  Accumulated depreciation

             

(3,874.3

)

 

(3,957.2

)

 

    Net Property, Plant and Equipment

             

7,210.4

   

7,088.0

   
                           

    TOTAL ASSETS

           

$

13,515.4

 

$

13,381.2

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

5
________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

   

March 31,

December 31,

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

             

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of dollars, except shares)

 
                           

CURRENT LIABILITIES

                         

  Short-term debt

           

$

1,173.9

 

$

836.0

   

  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

             

640.6

   

663.5

   

  Capital lease obligations due within one year

             

4.9

   

4.9

   

  Taxes accrued

             

107.6

   

59.8

   

  Interest accrued

             

69.3

   

90.1

   

  Other

             

296.6

   

320.3

   

    Total Current Liabilities

             

2,292.9

   

1,974.6

   
                           

DEFERRED CREDITS

                         

  Regulatory liabilities

             

526.2

   

391.9

   

  Income taxes

             

2,004.0

   

1,981.8

   

  Investment tax credits

             

54.4

   

55.7

   

  Other post-retirement benefit obligation

281.3

279.5

  Other

             

218.7

   

203.7

   

    Total Deferred Credits

             

3,084.6

   

2,912.6

   
                           

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

                         

  Long-term debt

             

3,974.6

   

4,362.1

   

  Transition Bonds issued by ACE Funding

             

516.2

   

523.3

   

  Long-term project funding

             

65.3

   

65.3

   

  Capital lease obligations

             

121.9

   

122.1

   

    Total Long-Term Liabilities

             

4,678.0

   

5,072.8

   
                           

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 4)

                         
                           

PREFERRED STOCK OF SUBSIDIARIES

                         

   Serial preferred stock

             

27.0

   

27.0

   

   Redeemable serial preferred stock

             

27.9

   

27.9

   

     Total Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries

             

54.9

   

54.9

   
                           

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

                         

  Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized
    400,000,000 shares, 188,786,679 shares and
    188,327,510 shares outstanding, respectively

             

1.9

   

1.9

   

  Premium on stock and other capital contributions

             

2,576.3

   

2,566.2

   

  Capital stock expense

             

(13.5

)

 

(13.5

)

 

  Accumulated other comprehensive loss

             

(31.8

)

 

(52.0

)

 

  Retained income

             

872.1

   

863.7

   

    Total Shareholders' Equity

             

3,405.0

   

3,366.3

   
                           

    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

           

$

13,515.4

 

$

13,381.2

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

6
________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

   

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
               

2005

   

2004

   
     

   (Millions of Dollars)

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

                         

Net income

           

$

55.5

 

$

51.2

   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

                         

  Extraordinary item

             

(15.2

)

 

-

   

  Depreciation and amortization

             

105.7

   

112.8

   

  Gain on sale of assets

             

(.4

)

 

(12.1

)

 

  Gain on sale of other investment

             

(8.0

)

 

-

   

  Regulatory assets, net

             

40.7

   

12.6

   

  Rents received from leveraged leases under income earned

             

(18.6

)

 

(21.3

)

 

  Deferred income taxes

             

(4.3

)

 

(3.9

)

 

  Changes in:

                         

    Accounts receivable

             

(8.8

)

 

46.9

   

    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

             

(46.3

)

 

(72.4

)

 

    Interest and taxes accrued

             

40.7

   

(37.8

)

 

    Other changes in working capital

             

7.9

   

53.8

   

Net other operating

             

19.6

   

8.3

   

Net Cash From Operating Activities

             

168.5

   

138.1

   
                           

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

                         

Net investment in property, plant and equipment

             

(88.3

)

 

(94.3

)

 

Proceeds from sale of assets

             

.4

   

28.5

   

Proceeds from the sale of other investments

             

23.8

   

-

   

Proceeds from sales of marketable securities

             

-

   

8.9

   

Net other investing activities

             

6.1

   

(8.3

)

 

Net Cash Used By Investing Activities

             

(58.0

)

 

(65.2

)

 
                           

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

                         

Dividends paid on common stock

             

(47.1

)

 

(42.9

)

 

Dividends paid on preferred stock

             

(.6

)

 

(.7

)

 

Common stock issued for the Dividend Reinvestment Plan

             

7.0

   

7.4

   

Redemption of debentures issued to financing trust

             

-

   

(25.0

)

 

Issuances of long-term debt

             

-

   

275.0

   

Reacquisition of long-term debt

             

(20.5

)

 

(44.5

)

 

Repayment of short-term debt, net

             

(35.1

)

 

(39.4

)

 

Net other financing activities

             

(.4

)

 

(4.6

)

 

Net Cash (Used By) From Financing Activities

             

(96.7

)

 

125.3

   
                           

Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

             

13.8

   

198.2

   

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

             

29.6

   

90.6

   
                           

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

           

$

43.4

 

$

288.8

   
                           

NONCASH ACTIVITIES

                         

Excess depreciation reserve transferred to regulatory liabilities
  (See Note (4) Commitments and Contingencies, under
  "Rate Proceedings - New Jersey")

           

$

131.0

 

$

-

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

7
________________________________________________________________________________________

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC.

(1)   ORGANIZATION

     Pepco Holdings, Inc. (Pepco Holdings or PHI) is a diversified energy company that, through its operating subsidiaries, is engaged in two principal business operations:

·

electricity and natural gas delivery (Power Delivery), and

·

competitive energy generation, marketing and supply (Competitive Energy).

     PHI is a public utility holding company registered under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA) and is subject to the regulatory oversight of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under PUHCA. As a registered public utility holding company, PHI requires SEC approval to, among other things, issue securities, acquire or dispose of utility assets or securities of utility companies and acquire other businesses. In addition, under PUHCA, transactions among PHI and its subsidiaries generally must be performed at cost and subsidiaries are prohibited from paying dividends out of capital or unearned surplus without SEC approval.

     PHI was incorporated in Delaware on February 9, 2001, for the purpose of effecting the acquisition of Conectiv by Potomac Electric Power Company (Pepco). The acquisition was completed on August 1, 2002, at which time Pepco and Conectiv became wholly owned subsidiaries of PHI. Conectiv was formed in 1998 to be the holding company for Delmarva Power & Light Company (DPL) and Atlantic City Electric Company (ACE) in connection with a merger between DPL and ACE. As a result, DPL and ACE are wholly owned subsidiaries of Conectiv. Conectiv also is a registered public utility holding company under PUHCA.

     PHI Service Company, a subsidiary service company of PHI, provides a variety of support services, including legal, accounting, tax, purchasing and information technology services to Pepco Holdings and its operating subsidiaries. These services are provided pursuant to a service agreement among PHI, PHI Service Company, and the participating operating subsidiaries that has been filed with, and approved by, the SEC under PUHCA. The expenses of the service company are charged to PHI and the participating operating subsidiaries in accordance with costing methodologies set forth in the service agreement.

     The following is a description of each of PHI's two principal business operations.

Power Delivery

     The largest component of PHI's business is power delivery, which consists of the transmission and distribution of electricity and the distribution of natural gas. PHI's Power Delivery business is conducted by its three regulated utility subsidiaries: Pepco, DPL and ACE, each of which is a regulated public utility in the jurisdictions that comprise its service territory. Each company is responsible for the delivery of electricity and, in the case of DPL, natural gas in its service territory, for which it is paid tariff rates established by the local public service commission. Each company also provides Default Electricity Supply, which is the supply of electricity at regulated rates to retail customers in its service territory who do not elect to purchase electricity from a competitive energy supplier. Default Electricity Supply is also

8
_____________________________________________________________________________

known as Default Service in Virginia, Standard Offer Service (SOS) in Maryland and the District of Columbia, as well as in Delaware on and after May 1, 2006, Basic Generation Service (BGS) in New Jersey, and Provider of Last Resort service (POLR) in Delaware before May 1, 2006. The rates each company is permitted to charge for the transmission of electricity is regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). This means that the profitability of the Power Delivery business depends on its ability through the rates it is permitted to charge to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on its capital investments.

Competitive Energy

     The competitive energy business provides competitive generation, marketing and supply of electricity and gas, and related energy management services, primarily in the mid-Atlantic region. PHI's competitive energy operations are conducted through subsidiaries of Conectiv Energy Holding Company (collectively, Conectiv Energy) and Pepco Energy Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, Pepco Energy Services).

Other Business Operations

     Over the last several years, PHI has discontinued its investments in non-energy related businesses, including the sale of its aircraft portfolio and the sale of its 50% interest in Starpower Communications LLC. These activities previously had been conducted through Potomac Capital Investment Corporation (PCI) and Pepco Communications, LLC, respectively. PCI's current activities are limited to the management of a portfolio of cross-border energy sale-leaseback transactions, with a book value at March 31, 2005, of approximately $1.2 billion. PCI does not plan on making further investments in non-energy related businesses, and will focus on maintaining the earnings stream from its energy leveraged leases. These remaining operations constitute a business segment entitled "Other Non-Regulated" for financial reporting purposes.

(2)   ACCOUNTING POLICY, PRONOUNCEMENTS, AND OTHER DISCLOSURES

Financial Statement Presentation

     Pepco Holdings' unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. Therefore, these financial statements should be read along with the annual financial statements included in PHI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. In the opinion of PHI's management, the consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which all are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to present fairly Pepco Holdings' financial condition as of March 31, 2005, in accordance with GAAP. Interim results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 may not be indicative of PHI's results that will be realized for the full year ending December 31, 2005, since its Power Delivery subsidiaries' sales of electric energy are seasonal. Additionally, certain prior period balances have been reclassified in order to conform to current period presentation.

9
_____________________________________________________________________________

FIN 45

     As of March 31, 2005 Pepco Holdings did not have material obligations under guarantees or indemnifications issued or modified after December 31, 2002, which are required to be recognized as a liability on its consolidated balance sheets; however, certain energy marketing obligations of Conectiv Energy were recorded as liabilities.

FIN 46R

     Subsidiaries of Pepco Holdings have power purchase agreements (PPAs) with a number of entities including three ACE Non-Utility Generation contracts (ACE NUGs) and Pepco's agreement with Panda-Brandywine, L.P. (Panda PPA). Due to a variable element in the pricing structure of the ACE NUGs and the Panda PPA, the Pepco Holdings' subsidiaries potentially assume the variability in the operations of the plants of these entities and therefore have a variable interest in the counterparties to these PPAs. As required by FIN 46R, Pepco Holdings continued to conduct exhaustive efforts to obtain information from these four entities but was unable to obtain sufficient information from these four entities to conduct the analysis required under FIN 46R to determine whether these four entities were variable interest entities or if Pepco Holdings' subsidiaries were the primary beneficiary. As a result, Pepco Holdings has applied the scope exemption from the application of FIN 46R for enterprises that have conducted exhaustive efforts to obtain the necessary information.

     Net purchase activities with the counterparties to the ACE NUGs and the Panda PPA in the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were approximately $100 million and $87 million, respectively, of which approximately $91 million and $79 million, respectively, related to power purchases under the ACE NUGs and the Panda PPA. Pepco Holdings' exposure to loss under the agreement with Panda entered into in 1991, pursuant to which Pepco is obligated to purchase from Panda 230 megawatts of capacity and energy annually through 2021 is discussed in Note (4), Commitments and Contingencies, under "Relationship with Mirant Corporation." Pepco Holdings does not have loss exposure under the ACE NUGs because cost recovery will be achieved from its customers through regulated rates.

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

     The following Pepco Holdings information is for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

10
_____________________________________________________________________________

   

Pension Benefits

   

Other
Post-Retirement
Benefits

   
   

2005

   

2004

   

2005

   

2004

   
 

(In Millions)

 

Service cost

$

9.4

 

$

9.6

 

$

2.1

 

$

2.4

   

Interest cost

 

24.3

   

23.8

   

8.4

   

8.3

   

Expected return on plan assets

 

(30.7

)

 

(29.8

)

 

(2.5

)

 

(2.8

)

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

.3

   

.3

   

(1.0

)

 

-

   

Amortization of net loss

 

2.5

   

4.5

   

2.5

   

3.1

   

Net periodic benefit cost

$

5.8

 

$

8.4

 

$

9.5

 

$

11.0

   
                           

     Pension

     The 2005 pension net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $5.8 million includes $2.6 million for Pepco, $2.1 million for ACE, and $(1.3) million for DPL. The remaining pension net periodic benefit cost is for other PHI subsidiaries. The 2004 pension net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $8.4 million includes $3.6 million for Pepco, $2.1 million for ACE, and $(.5) million for DPL. The remaining pension net periodic benefit cost is for other PHI subsidiaries.

     Pension Contributions

     Pepco Holdings' current funding policy with regard to its defined benefit pension plan is to maintain a funding level in excess of 100% of its accumulated benefit obligation (ABO). In 2004 and 2003 PHI made discretionary tax-deductible cash contributions to the plan of $10 million and $50 million, respectively. PHI's pension plan currently meets the minimum funding requirements of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) without any additional funding. PHI may elect, however, to make a discretionary tax-deductible contribution to maintain the pension plan's assets in excess of its ABO. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, no contributions were made. The potential discretionary funding of the pension plan in 2005 will depend on many factors, including the actual investment return earned on plan assets over the remainder of the year.

     Other Post-Retirement Benefits

    The 2005 other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $9.5 million includes $3.1 million for Pepco, $2.3 million for ACE, and $2.5 million for DPL. The remaining other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost is for other PHI subsidiaries. The 2004 other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $11.0 million includes $4.5 million for Pepco, $2.5 million for ACE, and $2.3 million for DPL. The remaining other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost is for other PHI subsidiaries.

Stock-Based Compensation

     The objective of Pepco Holdings' Long-Term Incentive Plan (the LTIP) is to increase shareholder value by providing a long-term incentive to reward officers, key employees, and directors of Pepco Holdings and its subsidiaries and to increase the ownership of Pepco

11
_____________________________________________________________________________

Holdings' common stock by such individuals. Any officer or key employee of Pepco Holdings or its subsidiaries may be designated by PHI's Board of Directors as a participant in the LTIP. Under the LTIP, awards to officers and key employees may be in the form of restricted stock, options, performance units, stock appreciation rights, or dividend equivalents. No awards were granted during the three months ended March 31, 2005.

     Pepco Holdings recognizes compensation costs for the LTIP based on the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." In accordance with FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (SFAS No. 123), as amended by FASB Statement No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure," the following table illustrates what the effect on net income and basic and diluted earnings per share would have been if Pepco Holdings had applied the fair value based method of expense recognition and measurement provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.

 

For the Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
   

2005

   

2004

   
 

(Millions, except Per Share Data)

 

Net Income, as reported

$

55.5

 

$

51.2

   

Add: Total stock-based employee compensation cost (net of related
  tax effect of $.4 million in each period) included in net income

 

.6

   

.8

   

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
  determined under fair value based methods for all awards (net
  of related tax effect of $.4 million and $.6 million, respectively)

 

(.7

)

 

(1.1

)

 

Pro forma net income

$

55.4

 

$

50.9

   
               

Basic and Diluted average common shares outstanding

 

188.4

   

171.8

   

Basic and Diluted earnings per share, as reported

$

.29

 

$

.30

   

Pro forma Basic and Diluted earnings per share

$

.29

 

$

.30

   
               

Medium-Term Note Retirement

     In March 2005, ACE retired at maturity $10 million of 6.67% medium-term notes and $2 million of 6.65% medium-term notes.

Effective Tax Rate

     PHI's effective tax rate before extraordinary item for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was 42% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for the difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate are state income taxes (net of federal benefit), changes in estimates related to tax liabilities for prior tax years subject to audit and the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences partially offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits and tax benefits related to certain leveraged leases.

      PHI's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was 18% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit, including the benefit associated with the retroactive adjustment for the

12
_____________________________________________________________________________

issuance of final consolidated tax return regulations by a local taxing authority, which is the primary reason for the lower effective rate as compared to 2005), the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits and tax benefits related to certain leveraged leases partially offset by the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences.

Extraordinary Item

     On April 19, 2005, a settlement related to ACE's electric distribution rate case was reached among ACE, the staff of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU), the New Jersey Ratepayer Advocate, and active intervenor parties. As a result of this settlement, ACE reversed $15.2 million ($9.0 million, after-tax) in accruals related to certain deferred costs that are now deemed recoverable. The after-tax credit to income of $9.0 million is classified as an extraordinary item (gain) since the original accrual was part of an extraordinary charge in conjunction with the accounting for competitive restructuring in 1999. See Note (4) Commitments and Contingencies, under "Rate Proceedings - New Jersey" for additional information.

New Accounting Standards

SAB 107 and SFAS 123R

     In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) which provides implementation guidance on the interaction between FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) and certain SEC rules and regulations as well as guidance on the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies.

     In April 2005, the SEC approved a new rule delaying the effective date of SFAS 123R for public companies. Under the SEC's rule, SFAS 123R is now effective for public companies for annual, rather than interim, periods that begin after June 15, 2005 (year ended December 31, 2006 for Pepco Holdings). Pepco Holdings is in the process of completing its evaluation of the impact of SFAS 123R and does not anticipate that its implementation or SAB 107 will have a material effect on PHI's overall financial position or net results of operations.

FIN 47

     In March 2005, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) published FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations applies to conditional asset retirement obligations as defined and requires that the fair value of a reasonably estimable conditional asset retirement obligation be recognized as part of the carrying amounts of the asset. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005 (December 31, 2005 for Pepco Holdings).  Pepco Holdings is in the process of evaluating the anticipated impact that the implementation of FIN 47 will have on its overall financial position or net results of operations.

13
_____________________________________________________________________________

(3)   SEGMENT INFORMATION

     Based on the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131 "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," Pepco Holdings' management has identified its operating segments at March 31, 2005 as Power Delivery, Conectiv Energy, Pepco Energy Services and Other Non-Regulated. Intercompany (intersegment) revenues and expenses are not eliminated at the segment level for purposes of presenting segment financial results as this elimination is accomplished for PHI's consolidated results through the "Corporate and Other" column. Segment financial information for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, in millions of dollars, is as follows.

 

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005

 
       

Competitive Energy Segments

                   
   

Power Delivery

   

Conectiv Energy

   

Pepco Energy Services

   

Other Non-Regulated

   

(a)
Corp. & Other

   

PHI Cons

   

Operating Revenue

$

1,104.7

 

$

509.4

(b)

$

352.6

 

$

20.5

 

$

(182.4

)

$

1,804.8

   

Operating Expense

 

990.7

(b)

 

495.8

   

348.5

   

1.2

   

(179.5

)

 

1,656.7

   

Operating Income (Loss)

 

114.0

   

13.6

   

4.1

   

19.3

   

(2.9

)

 

148.1

   

Interest Income

 

1.3

   

7.1

   

.4

   

20.8

   

(27.6

)

 

2.0

   

Interest Expense

 

41.6

   

13.9

   

.9

   

30.0

   

(3.6

)

 

82.8

   

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

 

34.0

   

4.5

   

1.7

   

4.4

   

(10.5

)

 

34.1

   

Extraordinary Item (net
  of taxes of $6.2 million)

 

9.0

(c)

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

9.0

   

Net Income (Loss)

$

52.3

 

$

3.1

 

$

2.4

 

$

13.6

 

$

(15.9

)

$

55.5

   

Total Assets

$

8,562.5

 

$

1,925.3

 

$

515.8

 

$

1,325.2

 

$

1,186.6

 

$

13,515.4

   

Construction Expenditures

$

85.0

 

$

1.6

 

$

.9

 

$

-

 

$

.8

 

$

88.3

   
                                       

(a)

Includes unallocated Pepco Holdings (parent company) capital costs, such as acquisition financing costs, and the depreciation and amortization related to purchase accounting adjustments for the fair value of non-regulated Conectiv assets and liabilities as of August 1, 2002. Intercompany transactions are eliminated in this line item. Additionally, this line item for "total assets" includes Pepco Holdings' goodwill balance.

(b)

Power Delivery purchased electric energy, electric capacity and natural gas from Conectiv Energy in the amount of $122.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005.

(c)

Relates to ACE's electric distribution rate case settlement that resulted in ACE's reversal of $9.0 million in after-tax accruals related to certain deferred costs that are now deemed recoverable. This amount is classified as extraordinary since the original accrual was part of an extraordinary charge in conjunction with the accounting for competitive restructuring in 1999.

 

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004

 
       

Competitive Energy Segments

                   
   

Power Delivery

   

Conectiv Energy

   

Pepco Energy Services

   

Other Non-Regulated

   

(a) Corp. & Other

   

PHI Cons

   

Operating Revenue

$

1,039.2

 

$

587.8

(b)

$

310.7

 

$

21.1

 

$

(194.7

)

$

1,764.1

   

Operating Expense

 

930.7

(b)

 

572.3

   

307.8

   

(3.3

)

 

(193.9

)

 

1,613.6

   

Operating Income (Loss)

 

108.5

   

15.5

   

2.9

   

24.4

   

(.8

)

 

150.5

   

Interest Income

 

2.5

   

1.1

   

.1

   

11.4

   

(13.9

)

 

1.2

   

Interest Expense

 

46.5

   

7.4

   

.6

   

21.4

   

16.7

   

92.6

   

Income Tax Expense (Benefit) (c)

 

27.2

   

3.4

   

(.4

)

 

(5.8

)

 

(13.0

)

 

11.4

   

Net Income (Loss)

$

40.8

 

$

5.0

 

$

3.3

 

$

20.1

 

$

(18.0

)

$

51.2

   

Total Assets

$

8,514.3

 

$

2,048.8

 

$

555.2

 

$

1,336.2

 

$

1,095.3

 

$

13,549.8

   

Construction Expenditures

$

90.9

 

$

2.9

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

.5

 

$

94.3

   
                                       

(a)

Includes unallocated Pepco Holdings (parent company) capital costs, such as acquisition financing costs, and the depreciation and amortization related to purchase accounting adjustments for the fair value of non-regulated Conectiv assets and liabilities as of August 1, 2002. Intercompany transactions are eliminated in this line item. Additionally, this line item for "total assets" includes Pepco Holdings' goodwill balance.

(b)

Power Delivery purchased electric energy, electric capacity and natural gas from Conectiv Energy in the amount of $148.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

(c)

In February 2004, a local jurisdiction issued final consolidated tax return regulations, which were retroactive to 2001. Under these regulations, Pepco Holdings (parent) and other affiliated companies doing business in this location, now have the necessary guidance to file a consolidated income tax return. This allows Pepco Holdings' subsidiaries with taxable losses to utilize those losses against tax liabilities of Pepco Holdings' companies with taxable income. During the first quarter of 2004, Pepco Holdings and its subsidiaries recorded the impact of the new regulations of $13.2 million for 2001 through 2003.

14
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

(4)   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

REGULATORY AND OTHER MATTERS

Relationship with Mirant Corporation

     In 2000, Pepco sold substantially all of its electricity generation assets to Mirant Corporation, formerly Southern Energy, Inc. As part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco entered into several ongoing contractual arrangements with Mirant and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, Mirant). On July 14, 2003, Mirant Corporation and most of its subsidiaries filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (the Bankruptcy Court).

     Depending on the outcome of the matters discussed below, the Mirant bankruptcy could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of Pepco Holdings and Pepco. However, management believes that Pepco Holdings and Pepco currently have sufficient cash, cash flow and borrowing capacity under their credit facilities and in the capital markets to be able to satisfy any additional cash requirements that may arise due to the Mirant bankruptcy. Accordingly, management does not anticipate that the Mirant bankruptcy will impair the ability of Pepco Holdings or Pepco to fulfill their contractual obligations or to fund projected capital expenditures. On this basis, management currently does not believe that the Mirant bankruptcy will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of either company.

     Transition Power Agreements

     As part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco and Mirant entered into Transition Power Agreements for Maryland and the District of Columbia, respectively (collectively, the TPAs). Under these agreements, Mirant was obligated to supply Pepco with all of the capacity and energy needed to fulfill its SOS obligations in Maryland through June 2004 and its SOS obligations in the District of Columbia through January 22, 2005.

15
_____________________________________________________________________________

     To avoid the potential rejection of the TPAs, Pepco and Mirant entered into an Amended Settlement Agreement and Release dated as of October 24, 2003 (the Settlement Agreement) pursuant to which Mirant assumed both of the TPAs and the terms of the TPAs were modified. The Settlement Agreement also provided that Pepco has an allowed, pre-petition general unsecured claim against Mirant Corporation in the amount of $105 million (the Pepco TPA Claim).

     Pepco has also asserted the Pepco TPA Claim against other Mirant entities, which Pepco believes are liable to Pepco under the terms of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement's Assignment and Assumption Agreement (the Assignment Agreement). Under the Assignment Agreement, Pepco believes that each of the Mirant entities assumed and agreed to discharge certain liabilities and obligations of Pepco as defined in the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement. Mirant has filed objections to these claims. Under the original plan of reorganization filed by the Mirant entities with the Bankruptcy Court, certain Mirant entities other than Mirant Corporation would pay significantly higher percentages of the claims of their creditors than would Mirant Corporation. The amount that Pepco will be able to recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate with respect to the Pepco TPA Claim will depend on the amount of assets available for distribution to creditors of the Mirant entities that are found to be liable for the Pepco TPA Claim.

     Power Purchase Agreements

     Under agreements with FirstEnergy Corp., formerly Ohio Edison (FirstEnergy), and Allegheny Energy, Inc., both entered into in 1987, Pepco is obligated to purchase from FirstEnergy 450 megawatts of capacity and energy annually through December 2005 (the FirstEnergy PPA). Under the Panda PPA, entered into in 1991, Pepco is obligated to purchase from Panda 230 megawatts of capacity and energy annually through 2021. In each case, the purchase price is substantially in excess of current market price. As a part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco entered into a "back-to-back" arrangement with Mirant. Under this arrangement, Mirant is obligated, among other things, to purchase from Pepco the capacity and energy that Pepco is obligated to purchase under the FirstEnergy PPA and the Panda PPA at a price equal to the price Pepco is obligated to pay under the FirstEnergy PPA and the Panda PPA (the PPA-Related Obligations).

     Pepco Pre-Petition Claims

     When Mirant filed its bankruptcy petition on July 14, 2003, Mirant had unpaid obligations to Pepco of approximately $29 million, consisting primarily of payments due to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations (the Mirant Pre-Petition Obligations). The Mirant Pre-Petition Obligations constitute part of the indebtedness for which Mirant is seeking relief in its bankruptcy proceeding. Pepco has filed Proofs of Claim in the Mirant bankruptcy proceeding in the amount of approximately $26 million to recover this indebtedness; however, the amount of Pepco's recovery, if any, is uncertain. The $3 million difference between Mirant's unpaid obligation to Pepco and the $26 million Proofs of Claim primarily represents a TPA settlement adjustment which is included in the $105 million Proofs of Claim filed by Pepco against the Mirant debtors in respect of the Pepco TPA Claim. In view of the uncertainty as to recoverability, Pepco, in the third quarter of 2003, expensed $14.5 million to establish a reserve against the $29 million receivable from Mirant. In January 2004, Pepco paid approximately $2.5 million to Panda in settlement of certain billing disputes under the Panda PPA that related to periods after the sale of Pepco's generation assets to Mirant. Pepco believes that under the terms

16
_____________________________________________________________________________

of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Mirant is obligated to reimburse Pepco for the settlement payment. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2004, Pepco increased the amount of the receivable due from Mirant by approximately $2.5 million and amended its Proofs of Claim to include this amount. Pepco currently estimates that the $14.5 million expensed in the third quarter of 2003 represents the portion of the entire $31.5 million receivable unlikely to be recovered in bankruptcy, and no additional reserve has been established for the $2.5 million increase in the receivable. The amount expensed represents Pepco's estimate of the possible outcome in bankruptcy, although the amount ultimately recovered could be higher or lower.

     Mirant's Attempt to Reject the PPA-Related Obligations

     On August 28, 2003, Mirant filed with the Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking authorization to reject its PPA-Related Obligations. Upon motions filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (the District Court) by Pepco and FERC, in October 2003, the District Court withdrew jurisdiction over the rejection proceedings from the Bankruptcy Court. In December 2003, the District Court denied Mirant's motion to reject the PPA-Related Obligations on jurisdictional grounds. The District Court's decision was appealed by Mirant and The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Mirant Corporation (the Creditors' Committee) to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the Court of Appeals). On August 4, 2004, the Court of Appeals remanded the case to the District Court saying that the District Court has jurisdiction to rule on the merits of Mirant's rejection motion, suggesting that in doing so the court apply a "more rigorous standard" than the business judgment rule usually applied by bankruptcy courts in ruling on rejection motions.

     On December 9, 2004, the District Court issued an order again denying Mirant's motion to reject the PPA-Related Obligations. The District Court found that the PPA-Related Obligations are not severable from the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement and that the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement cannot be rejected in part, as Mirant was seeking to do. On December 16, the Creditors' Committee appealed the District Court's order to the Court of Appeals, and on December 20, 2004, Mirant also appealed the District Court's order. Mirant and the Creditors' Committee each filed its brief on April 4, 2005. Pepco's and FERC's briefs are due May 19, 2005. Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled.

     As more fully discussed below, Mirant had been making regular periodic payments in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations. On December 9, 2004, Mirant filed a notice with the Bankruptcy Court that it was suspending payments to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations. On December 13, 2004, Mirant failed to make a payment of approximately $17.9 million due to Pepco for the period November 1, 2004 to November 30, 2004. On December 23, 2004, Pepco received a payment of approximately $6.8 million from Mirant, which according to Mirant represented the market value of the power for which payment was due on December 13. At that time, Mirant informed Pepco that it intended to continue to pay the market value, but not the above-market portion, of the power purchased under the PPA-Related Obligations. Pepco disagreed with Mirant's assertion that it need only pay the market value and believed that the amount representing the market value calculated by Mirant was insufficient.

     On January 21, 2005, Mirant made a payment of approximately $21.1 million. Pepco disputed Mirant's contention that the amount paid reflected the full amount due Pepco under these agreements for the applicable periods.

17
_____________________________________________________________________________

     On January 21, 2005, Mirant filed in the Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking to reject certain of its ongoing obligations under the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, including the PPA-Related Obligations (the Second Motion to Reject). On March 1, 2005 (as amended by order dated March 7, 2005), the District Court granted Pepco's motion to withdraw jurisdiction over the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement rejection proceedings from the Bankruptcy Court. In addition, the District Court ordered Mirant to pay on March 18, 2005, all past-due unpaid amounts under the PPA-Related Obligations. On March 4, 2004, Mirant filed an emergency motion for reconsideration and a stay of the March 1, 2005 order. On March 14, 2005, Pepco filed a response to Mirant's motion.

     On March 16, 2005, the District Court denied Mirant's emergency motion for reconsideration and stay of the District Court's March 1 and March 7 Orders. On the same day, Mirant filed a petition for writ of mandamus, and a motion for stay pending appeal and mandamus review in the Court of Appeals.

     On March 17, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued an Order staying the District Court's Orders of March 1 and March 7, 2005. Accordingly, Mirant was not required to make the payment that was due to Pepco on March 18, 2005 pursuant to the District Court's Orders. On March 28, 2005, in accordance with the Court of Appeals March 17 Order, Pepco, FERC, the Maryland Public Service Commission (MPSC) and Office of the People's Counsel (OPC) of Maryland filed oppositions to Mirant's petition for writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeals. Mirant and the Creditor's Committee filed briefs with the Court of Appeals on April 1, 2005.

     On March 28, 2005, Pepco, FERC, the District of Columbia OPC, the MPSC and the Maryland OPC filed oppositions to the Second Motion to Reject in the District Court.

     On April 11, 2005 the Court of Appeals entered an Order vacating the stay it had ordered on March 17, 2005 and denying Mirant's motions for writ of mandamus and stay pending appeal. On April 13, 2005, Pepco received a payment from Mirant in the amount of approximately $57.5 million, representing the full amount then due in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations.

     Pepco is exercising all available legal remedies and vigorously opposing Mirant's attempt to reject the PPA-Related Obligations and other obligations under the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement in order to protect the interests of its customers and shareholders. While Pepco believes that it has substantial legal bases to oppose the attempt to reject the agreements, the outcome of Mirant's efforts to reject the PPA-Related Obligations is uncertain.

     If Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations, Pepco could be required to repay to Mirant, for the period beginning on the effective date of the rejection (which date could be prior to the date of the court's order granting the rejection and possibly as early as September 18, 2003) and ending on the date Mirant is entitled to cease its purchases of energy and capacity from Pepco, all amounts paid by Mirant to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations, less an amount equal to the price at which Mirant resold the purchased energy and capacity. Pepco estimates that the amount it could be required to repay to Mirant in the unlikely event that September 18, 2003, is determined to be the effective date of rejection, is approximately $185.6 million as of May 1, 2005.

     Mirant has also indicated to the Bankruptcy Court that it will move to require Pepco to disgorge all amounts paid by Mirant to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations, less an amount equal to the price at which Mirant resold the purchased energy and capacity, for the

18
_____________________________________________________________________________

period July 14, 2003 (the date on which Mirant filed its bankruptcy petition) through rejection, if approved, on the theory that Mirant did not receive value for those payments. Pepco estimates that the amount it would be required to repay to Mirant on the disgorgement theory, in addition to the amounts described above, is approximately $22.5 million.

     Any repayment by Pepco of amounts paid by Mirant would entitle Pepco to file a claim against the bankruptcy estate in an amount equal to the amount repaid. Pepco believes that, to the extent such amounts were not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, they would be recoverable as stranded costs from customers through distribution rates as described below.

     The following are estimates prepared by Pepco of its potential future exposure if Mirant's attempt to reject the PPA-Related Obligations ultimately is successful. These estimates are based in part on current market prices and forward price estimates for energy and capacity, and do not include financing costs, all of which could be subject to significant fluctuation. The estimates assume no recovery from the Mirant bankruptcy estate and no regulatory recovery, either of which would mitigate the effect of the estimated loss. Pepco does not consider it realistic to assume that there will be no such recoveries. Based on these assumptions, Pepco estimates that its pre-tax exposure as of May 1, 2005, representing the loss of the future benefit of the PPA-Related Obligations to Pepco, is as follows:

·

If Pepco were required to purchase capacity and energy from FirstEnergy commencing as of May 1, 2005, at the rates provided in the PPA (with an average price per kilowatt hour of approximately 5.9 cents) and resold the capacity and energy at market rates projected, given the characteristics of the FirstEnergy PPA, to be approximately 5.7 cents per kilowatt hour, Pepco estimates that it would cost approximately $6.4 million for the remainder of 2005, the final year of the FirstEnergy PPA.

·

If Pepco were required to purchase capacity and energy from Panda commencing as of May 1, 2005, at the rates provided in the PPA (with an average price per kilowatt hour of approximately 16.8 cents), and resold the capacity and energy at market rates projected, given the characteristics of the Panda PPA, to be approximately 9.0 cents per kilowatt hour, Pepco estimates that it would cost approximately $19 million for the remainder of 2005, approximately $29 million in 2006, approximately $30 million in 2007, and approximately $30 million to $44 million annually thereafter through the 2021 contract termination date.

     The ability of Pepco to recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate in respect to the Mirant Pre-Petition Obligations and damages if the PPA-Related Obligations are successfully rejected will depend on whether Pepco's claims are allowed, the amount of assets available for distribution to the creditors of the Mirant companies determined to be liable for those claims, and Pepco's priority relative to other creditors. At the current stage of the bankruptcy proceeding, there is insufficient information to determine the amount, if any, that Pepco might be able to recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, whether the recovery would be in cash or another form of payment, or the timing of any recovery.

     If Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations and Pepco's full claim is not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, Pepco may seek authority from the MPSC and the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) to recover its additional costs. Pepco is committed to working with its regulatory authorities to achieve a result that is appropriate for its shareholders and customers. Under the provisions of the

19
_____________________________________________________________________________

settlement agreements approved by the MPSC and the DCPSC in the deregulation proceedings in which Pepco agreed to divest its generation assets under certain conditions, the PPAs were to become assets of Pepco's distribution business if they could not be sold. Pepco believes that, if Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations, these provisions would allow the stranded costs of the PPAs that are not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate to be recovered from Pepco's customers through its distribution rates. If Pepco's interpretation of the settlement agreements is confirmed, Pepco expects to be able to establish the amount of its anticipated recovery as a regulatory asset. However, there is no assurance that Pepco's interpretation of the settlement agreements would be confirmed by the respective public service commissions.

     If the PPA-Related Obligations are successfully rejected, and there is no regulatory recovery, Pepco will incur a loss. However, the accounting treatment of such a loss depends on a number of legal and regulatory factors, and is not determinable at this time.

     The SMECO Agreement

     As a term of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco assigned to Mirant a facility and capacity agreement with Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. (SMECO) under which Pepco was obligated to purchase the capacity of an 84-megawatt combustion turbine installed and owned by SMECO at a former Pepco generating facility (the SMECO Agreement). The SMECO Agreement expires in 2015 and contemplates a monthly payment to SMECO of approximately $.5 million. Pepco is responsible to SMECO for the performance of the SMECO Agreement if Mirant fails to perform its obligations thereunder. At this time, Mirant continues to make post-petition payments due to SMECO.

     On March 15, 2004, Mirant filed a complaint with the Bankruptcy Court seeking a declaratory judgment that the SMECO Agreement is an unexpired lease of non-residential real property rather than an executory contract and that if Mirant were to successfully reject the agreement, any claim against the bankruptcy estate for damages made by SMECO (or by Pepco as subrogee) would be subject to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code that limit the recovery of rejection damages by lessors. Pepco believes that there is no reasonable factual or legal basis to support Mirant's contention that the SMECO Agreement is a lease of real property. Litigation continues and the outcome of this proceeding cannot be predicted.

      Mirant Plan of Reorganization

     On January 19, 2005, Mirant filed its Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement with the Bankruptcy Court. In that plan, Mirant proposed to transfer all assets to "New Mirant" (an entity it proposed to create in the reorganization), with the exception of the PPA-Related Obligations. Mirant proposed that the PPA-Related Obligations would remain in "Old Mirant," which would be a shell entity as a result of the reorganization. Pepco believes this plan cannot be confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court under the law and has submitted objections to the plan. The plan also did not have the support of any of the creditor's committees in the Mirant bankruptcy.

     On March 11, 2005, Mirant filed an application with FERC seeking approval for the internal transfers and corporate restructuring that will result from its proposed Plan of Reorganization. Mirant must obtain FERC approval for these transactions under Section 203 of the Federal

20
_____________________________________________________________________________

Power Act. On April 1, 2005, Pepco filed a motion to intervene and protest at FERC in connection with Mirant's March 11 FERC filing. On the same date, the District of Columbia OPC also filed a motion to intervene and protest.

    On March 25, 2005, Mirant filed its First Amended Plan of Reorganization and First Amended Disclosure Statement. Pepco is currently analyzing this amended plan.

Rate Proceedings

     New Jersey

     In February 2003, ACE filed a petition with the NJBPU to increase its electric distribution rates and its Regulatory Asset Recovery Charge (RARC) in New Jersey. In December 2003, the NJBPU issued an order also consolidating into this base rate proceeding outstanding issues from several other proceedings. Later in December 2003, ACE filed a Motion for Reconsideration in which it suggested that these additional issues be dealt with in a Phase II to the base rate case to address the outstanding issues identified in the NJBPU's December 2003 order. The parties to the base rate proceeding agreed that a Phase II to the base rate case would be initiated in April 2004. Accordingly, in April 2004, ACE filed testimony with the NJBPU initiating a Phase II to the base rate proceeding, which addressed these additional issues and sought recovery of the $25.4 million of deferred restructuring costs previously transferred into the base rate case (which is also referred to as Phase 1).

     On April 19, 2005, a settlement was reached among ACE, the staff of the NJBPU, the New Jersey Ratepayer Advocate and active intervenor parties. The settlement, if approved by the NJBPU, will resolve issues in both the Phase I proceeding and the other issues referred by the NJBPU to the base rate proceeding and addressed in the Phase II proceeding. No party to either of these proceedings opposes the settlement.

    The proposed settlement will allow for an increase in ACE's base rates of approximately $18.8 million, $2.8 million of which would come from an increase in RARC revenue collections. $16 million of the base rate increase, not related to RARC collections, will be collected annually until such time as base rates change pursuant to another base rate proceeding. The $2.8 million in RARC collections will be collected each year for four years. The $18.8 million increase in base rate revenue will be offset by a base rate revenue decrease in a similar amount in total resulting from a change in depreciation rate, which is further discussed below, similar to what has been adopted by the NJBPU for other New Jersey electric utility companies. Overall, the settlement provides for a net decrease in revenues of approximately $.3 million, consisting of a $3.1 million reduction of distribution revenues offset by the $2.8 million increase in RARC revenue collections mentioned above. The proposed settlement specifies an overall rate of return of 8.14%. The proposed settlement provides for a change in depreciation rates driven by a change in average service lives. In addition, the settlement provides for a change in depreciation technique from remaining life to whole life, including amortization of any calculated excess or deficiencies in the depreciation reserve. As a result of these changes there is a net excess depreciation reserve. Accordingly PHI and ACE recorded a regulatory liability in March 2005 by reducing its depreciation reserve by approximately $131 million. The regulatory liability will be amortized over 8.25 years and will result in a reduction of depreciation and amortization expense on PHI's and ACE's consolidated statements of earnings. While the impact of the settlement will be

21
_____________________________________________________________________________

essentially revenue and cash neutral to PHI and ACE, there will be a positive annual pre-tax earnings impact to PHI and ACE of approximately $20 million.

     With respect to Phase II issues, which included supply-related deferred costs, the settlement provides for a disallowance of $13.0 million previously recorded to such deferred accounts and specifies the recovery over four years of an adjusted deferred balance of approximately $116.8 million, including a portion of the $25.4 million of costs transferred first into the Phase I proceeding from other proceedings and then ultimately into the Phase II proceeding, offset by the return over one year of over-collected balances in certain other deferred accounts, with the net result being that there will be no rate impact from the deferral account recoveries and credits for at least one year.

     The settlement does not become effective unless approved by the NJBPU. It is likely that the NJBPU will consider the settlement in the second quarter of 2005. While ACE believes it is probable that the NJBPU will approve the settlement, ACE cannot predict with certainty the timing of any NJBPU approval. The settlement does not affect the existing appeal filed by ACE with the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey (the NJ Superior Court) related to the July 2004 Final Decision and Order issued by the NJBPU in ACE's restructuring deferral proceeding before the NJBPU under the New Jersey Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act (EDECA), discussed below under "Restructuring Deferral."

     Delaware

     In October 2004, DPL submitted its annual Gas Cost Rate (GCR) filing to the Delaware Public Service Commission (DPSC). In its filing, DPL sought to increase its GCR by approximately 16.8% in anticipation of increasing natural gas commodity costs. The GCR, which permits DPL to recover its procurement gas costs through customer rates, became effective November 1, 2004 and is subject to refund pending evidentiary hearings. In addition, in November 2004, DPL filed a supplemental filing seeking approval to further increase GCR rates by an additional 6.5% effective December 29, 2004. The additional GCR increase became effective December 29, 2004 and, similarly, is subject to refund pending evidentiary hearings. The DPSC Staff and the Division of Public Advocate filed their testimony on March 7, 2005 recommending full approval of the GCR changes being sought by DPL, including the revisions to the tariff in the original and supplemental filings. An evidentiary hearing was held on May 5, 2005, at which both DPSC staff and the Division of Public Advocate testified that the rates sought by DPL should be approved as filed. A final order addressing both the November 1 and December 29 increases is expected in the second quarter of 2005.

     Pursuant to the April 16, 2002 merger settlement agreement in Delaware, on May 4, 2005, DPL made a filing with the DPSC whereby DPL seeks approval of a proposed increase of approximately $6.177 million in electric transmission service revenues, or about 1.1% of total Delaware retail electric revenues. This proposed revenue increase is the Delaware retail portion of the increase in the "Delmarva zonal" transmission rates on file with FERC under the Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) of the PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM). This level of revenue increase will decrease to the extent that competitive retail suppliers provide a supply and transmission service to retail customers. In that circumstance, PJM would charge the competitive retail supplier the PJM OATT rate for transmission service into the Delmarva zone and DPL's charges to the retail customer would exclude as a "shopping credit" an amount equal to the standard offer service supply charge and the transmission and ancillary charges that would

22
_____________________________________________________________________________

otherwise be charged by DPL to the retail customer. DPL has proposed to begin collecting this rate change for service rendered on and after June 3, 2005, subject to refund.

     District of Columbia

     Pepco's delivery rates in the District of Columbia generally are capped through July 2007, except with respect to residential low-income customers, for whom rates generally are capped through July 2009. In July 2004, Pepco filed a distribution rate review case with the DCPSC as required by the terms of the Pepco-Conectiv merger settlement approved by the DCPSC to determine whether Pepco's distribution rates would be decreased during the period the rates are capped. In accordance with the terms of the merger settlement, Pepco's distribution rates cannot be increased as a result of this proceeding. On April 7, 2005, the DCPSC approved a settlement of this proceeding which provides that Pepco's current distribution rates will remain unchanged through the end of the rate cap periods set forth above, except as otherwise provided in the merger settlement, or as may otherwise be required by the Commission or by law.

Restructuring Deferral

     Pursuant to a July 1999 summary order issued by the NJBPU under EDECA (which was subsequently affirmed by a final decision and order issued in March 2001), ACE was obligated to provide BGS from August 1, 1999 to at least July 31, 2002 to retail electricity customers in ACE's service territory who did not choose a competitive energy supplier. The order allowed ACE to recover through customer rates certain costs incurred in providing BGS. ACE's obligation to provide BGS was subsequently extended to July 31, 2003. At the allowed rates, for the period August 1, 1999 through July 31, 2003, ACE's aggregate allowed costs exceeded its aggregate revenues from supplying BGS. These under-recovered costs were partially offset by a $59.3 million deferred energy cost liability existing as of July 31, 1999 (LEAC Liability) that was related to ACE's Levelized Energy Adjustment Clause and ACE's Demand Side Management Programs. ACE established a regulatory asset in an amount equal to the balance.

     In August 2002, ACE filed a petition with the NJBPU for the recovery of approximately $176.4 million in actual and projected deferred costs relating to the provision of BGS and other restructuring related costs incurred by ACE over the four-year period August 1, 1999 through July 31, 2003. The deferred balance was net of the $59.3 million offset for the LEAC Liability. The petition also requested that ACE's rates be reset as of August 1, 2003 so that there would be no under-recovery of costs embedded in the rates on or after that date. The increase sought represented an overall 8.4% annual increase in electric rates and was in addition to the base rate increase discussed above. ACE's recovery of the deferred costs is subject to review and approval by the NJBPU in accordance with EDECA.

     In July 2003, the NJBPU issued a summary order, which (i) permitted ACE to begin collecting a portion of the deferred costs and reset rates to recover on-going costs incurred as a result of EDECA, (ii) approved the recovery of $125 million of the deferred balance over a ten-year amortization period beginning August 1, 2003, (iii) transferred to ACE's pending base rate case for further consideration approximately $25.4 million of the deferred balance, and (iv) estimated the overall deferral balance as of July 31, 2003 at $195 million, of which $44.6 million was disallowed recovery by ACE. In July 2004, the NJBPU issued its final order in the restructuring deferral proceeding. The final order did not modify the amount of the

23
_____________________________________________________________________________

disallowances set forth in the July 2003 summary order, but did provide a much more detailed analysis of evidence and other information relied on by the NJBPU as justification for the disallowances. ACE believes the record does not justify the level of disallowance imposed by the NJBPU. In August 2004, ACE filed with the NJ Superior Court, which hears appeals of New Jersey administrative agencies, including the NJBPU, a Notice of Appeal related to the July 2004 final order. ACE cannot predict the outcome of this appeal.

Divestiture Cases

     District of Columbia

     Final briefs on Pepco's District of Columbia divestiture proceeds sharing application were filed in July 2002 following an evidentiary hearing in June 2002. That application was filed to implement a provision of Pepco's DCPSC-approved divestiture settlement that provided for a sharing of any net proceeds from the sale of Pepco's generation-related assets. One of the principal issues in the case is whether Pepco should be required to share with customers the excess deferred income taxes (EDIT) and accumulated deferred investment tax credits (ADITC) associated with the sold assets and, if so, whether such sharing would violate the normalization provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and its implementing regulations. As of May 1, 2005, the District of Columbia allocated portions of EDIT and ADITC associated with the divested generation assets were approximately $6.5 million and $5.8 million, respectively. In March 2003, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) that is relevant to that principal issue. Comments on the NOPR were filed by several parties in June 2003, and the IRS held a public hearing later in June 2003. As a result of the NOPR, three of the parties in the divestiture case filed comments with the DCPSC urging the DCPSC to decide the tax issues now on the basis of the proposed rule. Pepco filed comments with the DCPSC in reply to those comments, in which Pepco stated that the courts have held and the IRS has stated that proposed rules are not authoritative and that no decision should be issued on the basis of proposed rules. Instead, Pepco argued that the only prudent course of action is for the DCPSC to await the issuance of final regulations relating to the tax issues and then allow the parties to file supplemental briefs on the tax issues. Pepco cannot predict whether the IRS will adopt the regulations as proposed, make changes before issuing final regulations or decide not to adopt regulations. Other issues in the proceeding deal with the treatment of internal costs and cost allocations as deductions from the gross proceeds of the divestiture.

     Pepco believes that a sharing of EDIT and ADITC would violate the normalization rules. If Pepco were required to share EDIT and ADITC and, as a result, the normalization rules were violated, Pepco would be unable to use accelerated depreciation on District of Columbia allocated or assigned property. Pepco, in addition to sharing with customers the generation-related ADITC balance, would have to pay to the IRS an amount equal to Pepco's $5.8 million District of Columbia jurisdictional generation-related ADITC balance as well as its District of Columbia jurisdictional transmission and distribution-related ADITC balance as of the later of the date a DCPSC order is issued and all rights to appeal have been exhausted or lapsed, or the date the DCPSC order becomes operative. As of May 1, 2005, the District of Columbia jurisdictional transmission and distribution-related ADITC balance was approximately $5.8 million.

     Pepco believes that its calculation of the District of Columbia customers' share of divestiture proceeds is correct. However, depending on the ultimate outcome of this proceeding, Pepco

24
_____________________________________________________________________________

could be required to make additional gain-sharing payments to District of Columbia customers, including the payments described above related to EDIT and ADITC. Such additional payments (which, other than the EDIT and ADITC related payments, cannot be estimated) would be charged to expense in the quarter and year in which a final decision is rendered and could have a material adverse effect on Pepco's and PHI's results of operations for those periods. However, neither PHI nor Pepco believes that additional gain-sharing payments, if any, or the ADITC-related payments to the IRS, if required, would have a material adverse impact on its financial condition. It is uncertain when the DCPSC will issue a decision.

     Maryland

    Pepco filed its divestiture proceeds plan application in Maryland in April 2001. Reply briefs were filed in May 2002. The principal issue in the Maryland case is the same EDIT and ADITC sharing issue that was raised in the D.C. case. As of May 1, 2005, the Maryland allocated portions of EDIT and ADITC associated with the divested generation assets were approximately $9.1 million and $10.4 million, respectively. Other issues deal with the treatment of certain costs as deductions from the gross proceeds of the divestiture. In November 2003, the Hearing Examiner in the Maryland proceeding issued a proposed order that concluded that Pepco's Maryland divestiture settlement agreement provided for a sharing between Pepco and customers of the EDIT and ADITC associated with the sold assets. Pepco believes that such a sharing would violate the normalization rules and would result in Pepco's inability to use accelerated depreciation on Maryland allocated or assigned property. If the proposed order is affirmed, Pepco would have to share with its Maryland customers, on an approximately 50/50 basis, the Maryland allocated portion of the generation-related EDIT, i.e. , $9.1 million as of May 1, 2005, and the generation-related ADITC. If such sharing were to violate the normalization rules, Pepco, in addition to sharing with customers an amount equal to approximately 50 percent of the generation-related ADITC balance, would be unable to use accelerated depreciation on Maryland allocated or assigned property. Furthermore, Pepco would have to pay to the IRS an amount equal to Pepco's $10.4 million Maryland jurisdictional generation-related ADITC balance as of May 1, 2005, as well as its Maryland retail jurisdictional ADITC transmission and distribution-related balance as of the later of the date a MPSC order is issued and all rights to appeal have been exhausted or lapsed, or the date the MPSC order becomes operative. As of May 1, 2005, the Maryland retail jurisdictional transmission and distribution-related ADITC balance was approximately $10.4 million. The Hearing Examiner decided all other issues in favor of Pepco, except that only one-half of the severance payments that Pepco included in its calculation of corporate reorganization costs should be deducted from the sales proceeds before sharing of the net gain between Pepco and customers. See also the disclosure above under "Divestiture Cases - District of Columbia" regarding the March 2003 IRS NOPR.

     Under Maryland law, if the proposed order is appealed to the MPSC, the proposed order is not a final, binding order of the MPSC and further action by the MPSC is required with respect to this matter. Pepco has appealed the Hearing Examiner's decision on the treatment of EDIT and ADITC and corporate reorganization costs to the MPSC. Pepco cannot predict what the outcome of the appeal will be or when the appeal might be decided. Pepco believes that its calculation of the Maryland customers' share of divestiture proceeds is correct. However, depending on the ultimate outcome of this proceeding, Pepco could be required to share with its customers approximately 50 percent of the EDIT and ADITC balances described above and make additional gain-sharing payments related to the disallowed severance payments. Such additional payments would be charged to expense in the quarter and year in which a final

25
_____________________________________________________________________________

decision is rendered and could have a material adverse effect on results of operations for those periods. However, neither PHI nor Pepco believes that additional gain-sharing payments, if any, or the ADITC-related payments to the IRS, if required, would have a material adverse impact on its financial condition.

SOS and Default Service Proceedings

     District of Columbia

     As more fully described in Note (12), Commitments and Contingencies, to the financial statements of the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K, in a proceeding initiated by the DCPSC to consider issues relating to (a) the establishment of terms and conditions for providing SOS in the District of Columbia after Pepco's obligation to provide SOS terminated on February 7, 2005, and (b) the selection of a new SOS provider, the DCPSC issued an order in March 2004 adopting the wholesale SOS model. Under this model, Pepco would continue to be the SOS provider in the District of Columbia after February 7, 2005. This March 2004 order, as amended by a DCPSC order issued in July 2004, also extended Pepco's obligation to provide SOS at market rates for up to an additional 76 months for small commercial and residential customers, and for an additional 28 months for large commercial customers.

     In August 2004, the DCPSC issued an order approving administrative charges including an average margin for Pepco of approximately $0.00248 per kilowatt hour, calculated based on total sales to residential, small and large commercial District of Columbia SOS customers over the twelve months ended December 31, 2003. Because margins vary by customer class, the actual average margin over any given time period will depend on the amount of electricity used by the respective classes of customers over the time period. The administrative charges went into effect for Pepco's District of Columbia SOS sales on February 8, 2005. Pepco completed the first competitive procurement process for District of Columbia SOS at the end of October and filed the proposed new SOS rates with the DCPSC on November 3, 2004.

     The TPA with Mirant under which Pepco obtained the fixed-rate DC SOS supply ended on January 22, 2005, while the new SOS supply contracts with the winning bidders in the competitive procurement process began on February 1, 2005. Pepco procured power separately on the market for next-day deliveries to cover the period from January 23 through January 31, 2005, before the new District of Columbia SOS contracts began. Consequently, Pepco had to pay the difference between the procurement cost of power on the market for next-day deliveries and the current District of Columbia SOS rates charged to customers during the period from January 23 through January 31, 2005. In addition, because the new District of Columbia SOS rates did not go into effect until February 8, 2005, Pepco had to pay the difference between the procurement cost of power under the new District of Columbia SOS contracts and the District of Columbia SOS rates charged to customers for the period from February 1 to February 7, 2005. The total amount of the difference is estimated to be approximately $8.7 million. This difference, however, will be included in the calculation of the Generation Procurement Credit (GPC) for the District of Columbia for the period February 8, 2004 through February 7, 2005. The GPC provides for a sharing between Pepco's customers and shareholders, on an annual basis, of any margins, but not losses, that Pepco earned providing SOS in the District of Columbia during the four-year period from February 8, 2001 through February 7, 2005. Currently, based on the rates paid by Pepco to Mirant under the TPA Settlement, there is no customer sharing. However, in the event that Pepco were to ultimately realize a significant

26
_____________________________________________________________________________

recovery from the Mirant bankruptcy estate associated with the TPA Settlement, the GPC would be recalculated, and the amount of customer sharing with respect to such recovery would be reduced because of the $8.7 million loss being included in the GPC calculation.

     Maryland

     Under a settlement approved by the MPSC in April 2003, Pepco is required to provide SOS at market rates to residential and small commercial customers through May 2008, to medium-sized commercial customers through May 2006, and to large commercial customers through May 2005. In accordance with the settlement, Pepco purchases the power supply required to satisfy its market rate SOS obligations from wholesale suppliers under contracts entered into pursuant to a competitive bid procedure approved by the MPSC. Pepco is entitled to recover from its SOS customers the cost of the SOS supply plus an average margin of $0.002 per kilowatt hour, calculated based on total sales to residential, small and large commercial Maryland SOS customers over the twelve months ended December 31, 2003. Because margins vary by customer class, the actual average margin over any given time period will depend on the amount of electricity used by the respective classes of customers over the time period.

     Under a settlement approved by the MPSC in April 2003, DPL is required to provide SOS supply at market rates to residential and small commercial customers through May 2008, to medium-sized commercial customers through May 2006, and to large commercial customers through May 2005. In accordance with the settlement, DPL purchases the power supply required to satisfy its market rate SOS obligations from wholesale suppliers under contracts entered into pursuant to a competitive bid procedure approved and supervised by the MPSC. DPL is entitled to recover from its SOS customers the costs of the SOS supply plus an average margin of $0.002 per kilowatt hour, calculated based on total sales to residential, small, and large commercial Maryland SOS customers over the twelve months ended December 31, 2003. Because margins vary by customer class, the actual average margin over any given time period will depend on the amount of electricity used by the respective classes of customers over the time period.

      Virginia

     Under amendments to the Virginia Electric Utility Restructuring Act implemented in March 2004, DPL is obligated to offer default service to customers in Virginia for an indefinite period until relieved of that obligation by the VSCC. DPL currently obtains all of the energy and capacity needed to fulfill its default service obligations in Virginia under a supply agreement with Conectiv Energy that commenced on January 1, 2005 and expires in May 2006. A prior agreement, also with Conectiv Energy, terminated effective December 31, 2004. DPL entered into this supply agreement after conducting a competitive bid procedure in which Conectiv Energy was the lowest bidder.

     In October 2004, DPL filed an application with the VSCC for approval to increase the rates that DPL charges its Virginia default service customers to allow it to recover its costs for power under the new supply agreement plus an administrative charge and a margin. A VSCC order issued in November 2004 allowed DPL to put interim rates into effect on January 1, 2005, subject to refund if the VSCC subsequently determined the rate is excessive. The interim rates reflected an increase of 1.0247 cents per kwh to the fuel rate, which provide for recovery of the entire amount being paid by DPL to Conectiv Energy, but did not include an administrative charge or margin, pending further consideration of this issue. Therefore, the November 2004

27
_____________________________________________________________________________

order also directed the parties to file memoranda concerning whether administrative costs and a margin are properly recovered through a fuel clause mechanism. Memoranda were filed by DPL, the VSCC Staff and Virginia's Office of Attorney General. The VSCC ruled in January 2005 that the administrative charge and margin are base rate items not recoverable through a fuel clause. No appeal is planned regarding this filing. A settlement resolving all other issues and making the interim rates final was filed on March 4, 2005, the amount of the final rates being contingent only on possible future adjustment depending on the result of a related proceeding at FERC. The VSCC approved the settlement on March 25, 2005.

     In October 2004, Conectiv Energy made a filing with FERC requesting authorization to enter into a contract to supply power to an affiliate, DPL, under the supply agreement described above. In December 2004, FERC granted the requested authorization effective January 1, 2005, subject to refund and hearings on the narrow question whether, in the absence of direct VSCC oversight over the DPL competitive bid process, DPL unduly preferred its own affiliate, Conectiv Energy, in the design and implementation of the DPL competitive bid process, or unduly favored Conectiv Energy in the credit criteria and analysis applied. DPL cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.

     Delaware

     Under a settlement approved by the DPSC, DPL is required to provide POLR service to retail customers in Delaware until May 1, 2006. In October 2004, the DPSC initiated a proceeding to investigate and determine which entity should act as the SOS supplier in DPL's Delaware service territory after May 1, 2006, and what prices should be charged for SOS after May 1, 2006. The process used in Delaware consists of three separate stages. The stage 1 process was constructed to allow the DPSC to determine by February 28, 2005 the fundamental issues related to the selection of an SOS supplier. Stage 2 would resolve issues relating to the process under which supply would be acquired by the SOS provider and the way in which SOS prices would be set and monitored. In Stage 3, these selection and pricing mechanisms would be implemented to determine the post-May 2006 SOS supplier and the post-May 2006 SOS price. On January 26, 2005, the DPSC Staff issued a report recommending to the DPSC that DPL be selected as the SOS supplier, subject to further discussions as to how to establish SOS prices. On March 22, 2005, the DPSC issued an order approving DPL as the SOS provider at market rates after May 1, 2006, when DPL's current fixed rate POLR obligation ends. The DPSC will determine in the future the duration of DPL's market rate SOS obligation and the margin, if any, that it will be permitted to earn in conjunction with providing the SOS. The DPSC also approved a structure whereby DPL will purchase the power supply required to satisfy its market rate SOS obligations from wholesale suppliers under contracts entered into pursuant to a competitive bid procedure.

Proposed Shut Down of B.L. England Generating Facility; Construction of Transmission Facilities

    Pursuant to a September 2003 NJBPU order, ACE filed a report in April 2004 with the NJBPU recommending that the B.L. England generating facility be shut down. The report stated that the operation of the B.L. England facility is necessary at the time of the report to satisfy reliability standards, but that those reliability standards could also be satisfied in other ways. The report concludes that, based on B.L. England's current and projected operating costs resulting from compliance with more restrictive environmental requirements, the most cost-

28
_____________________________________________________________________________

effective way in which to meet reliability standards is to shut down the B.L. England facility and construct additional transmission enhancements in southern New Jersey.

     The terms of an April 26, 2004 preliminary settlement among PHI, Conectiv, ACE, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) and the Attorney General of New Jersey, which are further discussed under "Preliminary Settlement Agreement with NJDEP," below, established emission limits for B.L. England's operations (which would become applicable on October 1, 2008 for Unit 1 and on May 1, 2009 for Unit 2 if B.L. England is not shut down) and required ACE to seek necessary approvals from agencies that may have jurisdiction to shut down and permanently cease operations at B.L. England by December 15, 2007, and to obtain approval to construct necessary substation and transmission facilities.

     In letters dated May and September 2004 to PJM, ACE informed PJM of its intent, as owner of the B.L. England generating plant, to retire the entire plant (447 MW) on December 15, 2007. PJM completed its independent analysis to determine the upgrades required to eliminate any identified reliability problems resulting from the retirement of B.L. England and recommended that certain transmission upgrades be installed prior to the summer of 2008. ACE's independent assessment confirmed that the transmission upgrades identified by PJM are the transmission upgrades necessary to maintain reliability in the Atlantic zone after the retirement of B.L. England. The amount of the costs incurred by ACE to construct the recommended transmission upgrades that ACE would be permitted to recover from load serving entities that use ACE's transmission system would be subject to approval by FERC. The amount of construction costs that ACE would be permitted to recover from retail ratepayers would be determined in accordance with the treatment of transmission-related revenue requirements in retail rates under the jurisdiction of the appropriate state regulatory commission. ACE cannot predict how the recovery of such costs will ultimately be treated by FERC and the state regulatory commissions and, therefore, cannot predict the financial impact to ACE of installing the recommended transmission upgrades. However, in the event that the NJBPU makes satisfactory findings and grants other requested approvals concerning the retirement of B.L. England and the construction of the transmission upgrades required to maintain reliability in the Atlantic zone after such retirement, ACE expects to begin construction of the appropriate transmission upgrades while final decisions by FERC and state regulatory commissions concerning the methodology for recovery of the costs of such construction are still pending.

     In November 2004, ACE made a filing with the NJBPU requesting the necessary approvals for construction of the transmission upgrades required to maintain reliability in the Atlantic zone after the retirement of B.L. England. The NJBPU issued an order on April 21, 2005, which unanimously approved the petition for the construction of the transmission upgrades, including the 230 kilovolt (kV) Cumberland to Dennis line, the138 kV Dennis to Corson line, and the 138 kV Cardiff to Lewis line. The approval states that these lines are necessary even if B.L. England does not shut down. On May 6, 2005, ACE announced that it would again auction its electric generation assets, including B.L. England. ACE intends to construct the transmission upgrades referred to above whether or not B.L. England is sold.

     In December 2004, ACE filed a petition with the NJBPU requesting that the NJBPU establish a proceeding that will consist of a Phase I and Phase II and that the procedural process for the Phase I proceeding require intervention and participation by all persons interested in the prudence of the decision to shut down B.L. England generating facility and the categories of stranded costs associated with shutting down and dismantling the facility and remediation of the

29
_____________________________________________________________________________

site. ACE contemplates that Phase II of this proceeding, which would be initiated by an ACE filing in 2008 or 2009, would establish the actual level of prudently incurred stranded costs to be recovered from customers in rates. Evidentiary hearings for the necessary approvals for construction of the transmission upgrades were held on March 28, 2005. It is expected that the NJBPU will rule on the petition in the second quarter of 2005. ACE cannot predict the outcome of these two proceedings.

General Litigation

     During 1993, Pepco was served with Amended Complaints filed in the state Circuit Courts of Prince George's County, Baltimore City and Baltimore County, Maryland in separate ongoing, consolidated proceedings known as "In re: Personal Injury Asbestos Case." Pepco and other corporate entities were brought into these cases on a theory of premises liability. Under this theory, plaintiffs argue that Pepco was negligent in not providing a safe work environment for employees or its contractors, who allegedly were exposed to asbestos while working on Pepco's property. Initially, a total of approximately 448 individual plaintiffs added Pepco to their complaints. While the pleadings are not entirely clear, it appears that each plaintiff sought $2 million in compensatory damages and $4 million in punitive damages from each defendant.

     Since the initial filings in 1993, additional individual suits have been filed against Pepco, and significant numbers of cases have been dismissed. As a result of two motions to dismiss, numerous hearings and meetings and one motion for summary judgment, Pepco has had approximately 400 of these cases successfully dismissed with prejudice, either voluntarily by the plaintiff or by the court. Of the approximately 250 remaining asbestos cases pending against Pepco, approximately 85 cases were filed after December 19, 2000, and have been tendered to Mirant for defense and indemnification pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement.

     While the aggregate amount of monetary damages sought in the remaining suits (excluding those tendered to Mirant) exceeds $400 million, Pepco believes the amounts claimed by current plaintiffs are greatly exaggerated. The amount of total liability, if any, and any related insurance recovery cannot be determined at this time; however, based on information and relevant circumstances known at this time, Pepco does not believe these suits will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition. However, if an unfavorable decision were rendered against Pepco, it could have a material adverse effect on Pepco's and PHI's results of operations.

Environmental Litigation

     PHI, through its subsidiaries, is subject to regulation by various federal, regional, state, and local authorities with respect to the environmental effects of its operations, including air and water quality control, solid and hazardous waste disposal, and limitations on land use. In addition, federal and state statutes authorize governmental agencies to compel responsible parties to clean up certain abandoned or unremediated hazardous waste sites. PHI's subsidiaries may incur costs to clean up currently or formerly owned facilities or sites found to be contaminated, as well as other facilities or sites that may have been contaminated due to past disposal practices.

     In May 2004, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) invited DPL to enter into pre-filing negotiations in connection with DPL's alleged liability under Comprehensive Environmental

30
_____________________________________________________________________________

Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 at the Diamond State Salvage site in Wilmington, Delaware. In the context of the negotiations, DOJ informed DPL that DPL is a de minimis party at the site. In February 2005, DPL entered into a de minimis consent decree with the United States which, if approved by the U.S. District Court, would require DPL to pay $144,000 as reimbursement of the government's response costs, resolve DPL's alleged liability, and provide DPL a covenant not to sue from the United States and protection from third-party claims for contribution.

     In July 2004, DPL entered into an Administrative Consent Order with the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) to perform a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) to further identify the extent of soil, sediment and ground and surface water contamination related to former manufactured gas plant (MGP) operations at the Cambridge, Maryland site on DPL-owned property and to investigate the extent of MGP contamination on adjacent property. The costs for completing the RI/FS for this site are approximately $300,000, approximately $50,000 of which will be expended in 2005. The costs of cleanup resulting from the RI/FS will not be determinable until the RI/FS is completed and an agreement with respect to cleanup is reached with the MDE. Due to project delays, DPL now expects that the completion date for the RI/FS will be in the fourth quarter of 2005.

     In October 1995, Pepco and DPL each received notice from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that it, along with several hundred other companies, might be a potentially responsible party (PRP) in connection with the Spectron Superfund Site in Elkton, Maryland. The site was operated as a hazardous waste disposal, recycling and processing facility from 1961 to 1988.

     In August 2001, Pepco entered into a consent decree for de minimis parties with EPA to resolve its liability at this site. Under the terms of the consent decree, which was approved by the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in March 2003, Pepco made de minimis payments to the United States and a group of PRPs. In return, those parties agreed not to sue Pepco for past and future costs of remediation at the site and the United States will also provide protection against third-party claims for contributions related to response actions at the site. The consent decree does not cover any damages to natural resources. However, Pepco believes that any liability that it might incur due to natural resource damage at this site would not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. In April 1996 DPL, with numerous other PRPs, entered into an administrative order on consent with EPA to perform an RI/FS at the site. In February 2003, the EPA informed DPL that it will have no future liability for contribution to the remediation of the site.

     In the early 1970s, both Pepco and DPL sold scrap transformers, some of which may have contained some level of PCBs, to a metal reclaimer operating at the Metal Bank/Cottman Avenue site in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, owned by a nonaffiliated company. In December 1987, Pepco and DPL were notified by EPA that they, along with a number of other utilities and non-utilities, were PRPs in connection with the PCB contamination at the site.

     In October 1994, an RI/FS including a number of possible remedies was submitted to the EPA. In December 1997, the EPA issued a Record of Decision that set forth a selected remedial action plan with estimated implementation costs of approximately $17 million. In June 1998, the EPA issued a unilateral administrative order to Pepco and 12 other PRPs to conduct the design and actions called for in its decision. In May 2003, two of the potentially liable owner/operator entities filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

31
_____________________________________________________________________________

In October 2003, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed a Reorganization Plan that incorporates the terms of a settlement among the debtors, the United States and a group of utility PRPs including Pepco. Under the settlement, the reorganized entity/site owner will pay a total of $13.25 million to remediate the site.

     As of May 1, 2005, Pepco had accrued $1.7 million to meet its liability for a site remedy. At the present time, it is not possible to estimate the total extent of EPA's administrative and oversight costs or the expense associated with a site remedy ultimately implemented. However, Pepco believes that its liability at this site will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

     In 1999, DPL entered into a de minimis settlement with EPA and paid approximately $107,000 to resolve its liability for cleanup costs at the site. The de minimis settlement did not resolve DPL's responsibility for natural resource damages, if any, at the site. DPL believes that any liability for natural resource damages at this site will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

     In June 1992, EPA identified ACE as a PRP at the Bridgeport Rental and Oil Services Superfund Site in Logan Township, New Jersey. In September 1996, ACE along with other PRPs signed a consent decree with EPA and NJDEP to address remediation of the site. ACE's liability is limited to 0.232 percent of the aggregate remediation liability and thus far ACE has made contributions of approximately $105,000. Based on information currently available, ACE may be required to contribute approximately an additional $100,000. ACE believes that its liability at this site will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

     In November 1991, NJDEP identified ACE as a PRP at the Delilah Road Landfill site in Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey. In 1993, ACE, along with other PRPs, signed an administrative consent order with NJDEP to remediate the site. The soil cap remedy for the site has been completed and the NJDEP conditionally approved the report submitted by the parties on the implementation of the remedy in January 2003. In March 2004, NJDEP approved a Ground Water Sampling and Analysis Plan. The results of groundwater monitoring over the first year of this ground water sampling plan will help to determine the extent of post-remedy operation and maintenance costs. In March 2003, EPA demanded from the PRP group reimbursement for EPA's past costs at the site, totaling $168,789. The PRP group objected to the demand for certain costs, but agreed to reimburse EPA approximately $19,000. Based on information currently available, ACE may be required to contribute approximately an additional $626,000. ACE believes that its liability for post-remedy operation and maintenance costs will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Preliminary Settlement Agreement with the NJDEP

     In an effort to address NJDEP's concerns regarding ACE's compliance with New Source Review (NSR) requirements at B.L. England, on April 26, 2004, PHI, Conectiv and ACE entered into a preliminary settlement agreement with NJDEP and the Attorney General of New Jersey. The preliminary settlement agreement outlines the basic parameters for a definitive agreement to resolve ACE's NSR liability at B.L. England and various other environmental issues at ACE and Conectiv Energy facilities in New Jersey. Among other things, the preliminary settlement agreement provides that:

32
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

·

contingent upon the receipt of necessary approvals from the NJBPU, PJM, North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC), FERC, and other regulatory authorities and the receipt of permits to construct certain transmission facilities in southern New Jersey, ACE will permanently cease operation of the B.L. England generating facility by December 15, 2007. In the event that ACE is unable to shut down the B.L. England facility by December 15, 2007 through no fault of its own ( e.g. , because of failure to obtain the required regulatory approvals), B.L. England Unit 1 would be required to comply with stringent sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and particulate matter emissions limits set forth in the preliminary settlement agreement by October 1, 2008, and B.L. England Unit 2 would be required to comply with these emissions limits by May 1, 2009. If ACE does not either shut down the B.L. England facility by December 15, 2007 or satisfy the emissions limits applicable in the event shut down is not so completed, ACE would be required to pay significant monetary penalties.

·

to address ACE's appeal of NJDEP actions relating to NJDEP's July 2001 denial of ACE's request to renew a permit variance from sulfur-in-fuel requirements under New Jersey regulations, effective through July 30, 2001, that authorized Unit 1 at B.L. England generating facility to burn bituminous coal containing greater than 1% sulfur, ACE will be permitted to combust coal with a sulfur content of greater than 1% at the B.L. England facility in accordance with the terms of B.L. England's current permit until December 15, 2007 and NJDEP will not impose new, more stringent short-term SO 2 emissions limits on the B.L. England facility during this period. However, in the absence of a consent order or other final settlement document, which the parties continue to negotiate as required by the preliminary settlement agreement, ACE will need to seek, in July 2005, a renewal of its current fuel authorization, which is scheduled to expire on July 30, 2006.

·

to resolve any possible civil liability (and without admitting liability) for violations of the permit provisions of the New Jersey Air Pollution Control Act (APCA) and the Prevention of Significant Deterioration provisions of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) relating to modifications that may have been undertaken at the B.L. England facility, ACE paid a $750,000 civil penalty to NJDEP on June 1, 2004. To compensate New Jersey for other alleged violations of the APCA and/or the CAA, ACE will undertake environmental projects valued at $2 million, which are beneficial to the state of New Jersey and approved by the NJDEP in a consent order or other final settlement document.

·

ACE will submit all federally required studies and complete construction of facilities, if any, necessary to satisfy the EPA's new cooling water intake structure regulations in accordance with the schedule that NJDEP established in the recent renewal of the New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for the B.L. England facility. The schedule takes into account ACE's agreement, provided that all regulatory approvals are obtained, to shut down the B.L. England facility by December 15, 2007.

33
____________________________________________________________________________

·

to resolve any possible civil liability (and without admitting liability) for natural resource damages resulting from groundwater contamination at the B.L. England facility, Conectiv Energy's Deepwater generating facility and ACE's operations center near Pleasantville, New Jersey, ACE and Conectiv will pay NJDEP $674,162 or property of equivalent value and will remediate the groundwater contamination at all three sites. If subsequent data indicate that groundwater contamination is more extensive than indicated in NJDEP's preliminary analysis, NJDEP may seek additional compensation for natural resource damages.

     The preliminary settlement agreement provides that the parties will work toward a consent order or other final settlement document that reflects the terms of the preliminary settlement agreement. ACE, Conectiv and PHI continue to negotiate with the NJDEP the terms of a consent order or other final settlement document.

Federal Tax Treatment of cross-border Leases

     PCI maintains a portfolio of cross-border energy sale-leaseback transactions, which as of March 31, 2005 had a book value of approximately $1.2 billion and from which PHI currently derives approximately $55 million per year in tax benefits in the form of interest and depreciation deductions. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 imposed new passive loss limitation rules that apply prospectively to leases (including cross-border leases) entered into after March 12, 2004 with tax indifferent parties ( i.e ., municipalities and tax exempt or governmental entities). All of PCI's cross-border energy leases are with tax indifferent parties and were entered into prior to 2004. Although this legislation is prospective in nature and does not affect PCI's existing cross-border energy leases, it does not prohibit the IRS from challenging prior leasing transactions. In this regard, on February 11, 2005, the Treasury Department and IRS issued Notice 2005-13 informing taxpayers that the IRS intends to challenge on various grounds the purported tax benefits claimed by taxpayers entering into certain sale-leaseback transactions with tax-indifferent parties, including those entered into on or prior to March 12, 2004 (the Notice). PCI's cross-border energy leases are similar to those sale-leaseback transactions described in the Notice.

     PCI's leases have been under examination by the IRS as part of the normal PHI tax audit. On May 4, 2005, the IRS issued a Notice of Proposed Adjustment to PHI that challenges the tax benefits realized from interest and depreciation deductions claimed by PHI with respect to these leases for the tax years 2001 and 2002. The tax benefits claimed by PHI with respect to these leases from 2001 through the first quarter of 2005 were approximately $189 million. The ultimate outcome of this issue is uncertain; however, if the IRS prevails, PHI would be subject to additional taxes, along with interest and possibly penalties on the additional taxes, which could have a material adverse effect on PHI's results of operations and cash flow.

    PHI believes that its tax position related to these transactions was proper based on applicable statutes, regulations and case law, and intends to contest any adjustments proposed by the IRS; however, there is no assurance that PHI's position will prevail.

     Under SFAS No. 13, as currently interpreted, a settlement with the IRS that results in a deferral of tax benefits that does not change the total estimated net income from a lease does not require an adjustment to the book value of the lease. However, if the IRS were to disallow, rather than require the deferral of, certain tax deductions related to PHI's leases, PHI would be required to adjust the book value of the leases and record a charge to earnings equal to the

34
_____________________________________________________________________________

repricing impact of the disallowed deductions. Such a charge to earnings, if required, is likely to have a material adverse effect on PHI's results of operations for the period in which the charge is recorded.

     In recent deliberations, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has determined that a change in the timing of tax benefits also should require a repricing of the lease and an adjustment to the book value of a lease. Under this interpretation, a material change in the timing of cash flows under PHI's cross-border leases as the result of a settlement with the IRS also would require an adjustment to the book value. PHI understands that the FASB intends to publish this guidance for comment in the near future to become effective at the end of 2005. If adopted, the application of this guidance could result in a material adverse effect on PHI's results of operations even if the resolution is limited to a deferral of the tax benefits realized by PCI from its leases.

Third Party Guarantees, Indemnifications, and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     Pepco Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries have various financial and performance guarantees and indemnification obligations which are entered into in the normal course of business to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties as discussed below.

     As of March 31, 2005, Pepco Holdings and its subsidiaries were parties to a variety of agreements pursuant to which they were guarantors for standby letters of credit, performance residual value, and other commitments and obligations. The fair value of these commitments and obligations was not required to be recorded in Pepco Holdings' Consolidated Balance Sheets; however, certain energy marketing obligations of Conectiv Energy were recorded. The commitments and obligations, in millions of dollars, were as follows:

Guarantor

     
   

PHI

 

DPL

 

ACE

 

PCI

 

Total

 

Energy marketing obligations of Conectiv Energy (1)

$

157.8

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

157.8

 

Energy procurement obligations of Pepco Energy Services (1)

 

7.0

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

7.0

 

Standby letters of credit of Pepco Holdings (2)

 

.6

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

.6

 

Guaranteed lease residual values (3)

 

.7

 

3.1

 

3.1

 

-

 

6.9

 

Loan agreement (4)

 

13.1

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

13.1

 

Other (5)

 

20.4

 

-

 

-

 

2.9

 

23.3

 

  Total

$

199.6

$

3.1

$

3.1

$

2.9

$

208.7

 
                       

1.

Pepco Holdings has contractual commitments for performance and related payments of Conectiv Energy and Pepco Energy Services to counterparties related to routine energy sales and procurement obligations, including requirements under BGS contracts for ACE.

2.

Pepco Holdings has issued standby letters of credit of $.6 million on behalf of subsidiaries' operations related to Conectiv Energy's competitive energy activities and third party construction performance. These standby letters of credit were put into place in order to allow the subsidiaries the flexibility needed to conduct business with counterparties without having to post substantial cash collateral. While the exposure under these standby letters of credit is $.6 million, Pepco Holdings does not expect to fund the full amount.

3.

Subsidiaries of Pepco Holdings have guaranteed residual values in excess of fair value related to certain equipment and fleet vehicles held through lease agreements. As of

35
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

March 31, 2005, obligations under the guarantees were approximately $6.9 million. Assets leased under agreements subject to residual value guarantees are typically for periods ranging from 2 years to 10 years. Historically, payments under the guarantees have not been made by the guarantor as, under normal conditions, the contract runs to full term at which time the residual value is minimal. As such, Pepco Holdings believes the likelihood of requiring payment under the guarantee is remote.

4.

Pepco Holdings has issued a guarantee on the behalf of a subsidiary's 50% unconsolidated investment in a limited liability company for repayment borrowings under a loan agreement of approximately $13.1 million.

5.

Other guarantees comprise:

 

·

Pepco Holdings has performance obligations of $1.7 million relating to obligations to third party suppliers of equipment.

 

·

Pepco Holdings has guaranteed payment of a bond issued by a subsidiary of $14.9 million. Pepco Holdings does not expect to fund the full amount of the exposure under the guarantee.

 

·

Pepco Holdings has guaranteed a subsidiary building lease of $3.8 million. Pepco Holdings does not expect to fund the full amount of the exposure under the guarantee.

·

PCI has guaranteed facility rental obligations related to contracts entered into by Starpower Communications LLC. As of March 31, 2005, the guarantees cover the remaining $2.9 million in rental obligations.

     Pepco Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries have entered into various indemnification agreements related to purchase and sale agreements and other types of contractual agreements with vendors and other third parties. These indemnification agreements typically cover environmental, tax, litigation and other matters, as well as breaches of representations, warranties and covenants set forth in these agreements. Typically, claims may be made by third parties under these indemnification agreements over various periods of time depending on the nature of the claim. The maximum potential exposure under these indemnification agreements can range from a specified dollar amount to an unlimited amount depending on the nature of the claim and the particular transaction. The total maximum potential amount of future payments under these indemnification agreements is not estimable due to several factors, including uncertainty as to whether or when claims may be made under these indemnities.

Dividends

     On April 27, 2005, Pepco Holdings' Board of Directors declared a dividend on common stock of 25 cents per share payable June 30, 2005, to shareholders of record on June 10, 2005.

36
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

(5)  USE OF DERIVATIVES IN ENERGY AND INTEREST RATE HEDGING ACTIVITIES

     PHI accounts for its derivative activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133) as amended by subsequent pronouncements. See "Accounting for Derivatives" in Note 2 and "Use of Derivatives in Energy and Interest Rate Hedging Activities" in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of PHI included in PHI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, for a discussion of the accounting treatment of the derivatives used by PHI and its subsidiaries.

     The table below provides detail on effective cash flow hedges under SFAS 133 included in PHI's consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2005. Under SFAS 133, cash flow hedges are marked-to-market on the balance sheet with corresponding adjustments to AOCI. The data in the table indicates the magnitude of the effective cash flow hedges by hedge type (i.e., other energy commodity and interest rate hedges), maximum term, and portion expected to be reclassified to earnings during the next 12 months.

Cash Flow Hedges Included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
As of March 31, 2005
(Dollars in Millions)

Contracts

Accumulated
OCI (Loss)
After Tax 
(1)

Portion Expected
to be Reclassified
to Earnings during
the Next 12 Months

Maximum    Term   

 

Other Energy Commodity

$

17.9

 

$

27.7

 

60 months

 

Interest Rate

 

(45.6

)

 

(7.3

)

329 months

 

     Total

$

(27.7

)

$

20.4

(1)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss as of March 31, 2005, includes $(4.1) million for an adjustment for minimum pension liability. This adjustment is not included in this table as it is not a cash flow hedge.

     The following table shows, in millions of dollars, the pre-tax gain or (loss) recognized in earnings for cash flow hedge ineffectiveness for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and where they were reported in PHI's consolidated statements of earnings during the periods.

 

2005

2004  

 

Operating Revenue

$

1.1

 

$

(2.8

)

 

Fuel and Purchased Energy

 

(.9

)

 

(1.7

)

 

     Total

$

.2

$

(4.5

)

     For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, there were no forecasted hedged transactions deemed to be no longer probable.

37
_____________________________________________________________________________

     In connection with their other energy commodity activities and discontinued proprietary trading activities, PHI's competitive energy segments hold certain derivatives that do not qualify as hedges. Under SFAS 133, these derivatives are marked-to-market through earnings with corresponding adjustments on the balance sheet. The pre-tax gains (losses) on these derivatives are summarized in the following table, in millions of dollars, for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

2005

2004

Proprietary Trading

$

-

 

$

(.2

)

 

Other Energy Commodity

 

1.7

   

1.2

   

     Total

$

1.7

$

1.0

(6)   SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (DEBT)

     On May 5, 2005, Pepco Holdings, Pepco, DPL and ACE entered into a five-year credit agreement with an aggregate borrowing limit of $1.2 billion. This agreement replaces a $650 million five-year credit agreement that was entered into in July 2004 and a $550 million three-year credit agreement entered into in July 2003. Pepco Holdings' credit limit under this agreement is $700 million.  The credit limit of each of Pepco, DPL and ACE is the lower of $300 million and the maximum amount of debt the company is permitted to have outstanding by its regulatory authorities, except that the aggregate amount of credit used by Pepco, DPL and ACE at any given time under the agreement may not exceed $500 million in the aggregate. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the companies are entitled to request increases in the principal amount of available credit up to an aggregate increase of $300 million, with any such increase proportionately increasing the credit limit of each of the respective borrowers and the $300 million sublimits for each of Pepco, DPL and ACE.  The interest rate payable by the respective companies on utilized funds will be based on a pricing schedule determined by the credit rating of the borrower. The indebtedness incurred under the Credit Agreement is unsecured.

     The credit agreement is intended to serve primarily as a source of liquidity to support the commercial paper programs of the respective companies. The companies also are permitted to use the facility to borrow funds for general corporate purposes and issue letters of credit. In order for a borrower to use the facility, certain representations and warranties made by the borrower at the time the credit agreement was entered into also must be true at the time the facility is utilized, and the borrower must be in compliance with specified covenants, including the financial covenant described below. However, a material adverse change in the borrower's business, property, or financial condition subsequent to the entry into the credit agreement is not a condition to the availability of credit under the facility. Among the covenants contained in the credit agreement are (i) the requirement that each borrowing company maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization of 65% or less, computed in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, (ii) a restriction on sales or other dispositions of assets, other than sales and dispositions permitted by the credit agreement and (iii) a restriction on the incurrence of liens on the assets of a borrower or any of its significant subsidiaries other than liens permitted by the credit agreement.   The failure to satisfy any of the covenants or the occurrence of specified events that constitute events of default that could result in the acceleration of repayment obligations of the borrower. The events of default include (i) the failure of any borrowing company or any of its significant subsidiaries to pay when due, or the acceleration of, certain

38
_____________________________________________________________________________

indebtedness under other borrowing arrangements, (ii) certain bankruptcy events, judgments or decrees against any borrowing company or its significant subsidiaries, and (iii) a change in control (as defined in the credit agreement) of Pepco Holdings or the failure of Pepco Holdings to own all of the voting stock of Pepco, DPL and ACE. The agreement does not include any ratings triggers.

     In May 2005, Conectiv called for early redemption on June 1, 2005, all of the remaining $20 million of 6.73% Series A due June 1, 2006 at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% of the principal amount outstanding and the make-whole call provision, to be determined prior to the call date.

 

 

 

 

 

39
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 

 

 

40
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)

   

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
               

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of Dollars)

 
                           

Operating Revenue

           

$

425.5

 

$

369.6

   
                           

Operating Expenses

                         

  Fuel and purchased energy

             

216.4

   

173.7

   

  Other operation and maintenance

             

66.5

   

67.1

   

  Depreciation and amortization

39.8

43.9

  Other taxes

65.7

56.5

  Gain on sale of assets

-

(6.6

)

     Total Operating Expenses

388.4

334.6

                           

Operating Income

             

37.1

   

35.0

   

Other Income (Expenses)

                         

  Interest and dividend income

             

.5

   

-

   

  Interest expense

             

(19.0

)

 

(20.2

)

 

  Other income

             

2.5

   

1.4

   

  Other expenses

             

(.5

)

 

(.5

)

 

     Total Other Expenses

(16.5

)

(19.3

)

Income Before Income Tax Expense

20.6

15.7

Income Tax Expense

             

9.1

   

6.2

   
                           

Net Income

11.5

9.5

Dividends on Redeemable Serial Preferred Stock

.3

.4

Earnings Available for Common Stock

11.2

9.1

Retained Income at Beginning of Period

496.4

505.3

Dividends paid to Pepco Holdings

(14.9

)

(11.8

)

Retained Income at End of Period

$

492.7

$

502.6

                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements.

41
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

   

March 31,

December 31,

 

ASSETS

             

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of Dollars)

 

CURRENT ASSETS

                         

  Cash and cash equivalents

           

$

8.3

 

$

1.5

   

  Accounts receivable, less allowance for
    uncollectible accounts of $20.0 million
    and $20.1 million, respectively

             

360.1

   

317.5

   

  Materials and supplies-at average cost

             

42.4

   

38.2

   

  Prepaid expenses and other

             

21.8

   

6.8

   

    Total Current Assets

             

432.6

   

364.0

   
                           

INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS

                         

  Regulatory assets

             

125.7

   

125.7

   

  Prepaid pension expense

             

168.6

   

171.1

   

  Other

             

133.4

   

129.9

   

    Total Investments and Other Assets

             

427.7

   

426.7

   
                           

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

                         

  Property, plant and equipment

             

4,882.0

   

4,869.4

   

  Accumulated depreciation

             

(1,963.6

)

 

(1,937.8

)

 

    Net Property, Plant and Equipment

             

2,918.4

   

2,931.6

   
                           

    TOTAL ASSETS

           

$

3,778.7

 

$

3,722.3

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements.

42
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

   

March 31,

December 31,

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

             

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of dollars, except shares)

 
                           

CURRENT LIABILITIES

                         

  Short-term debt

           

$

136.4

 

$

114.0

   

  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

             

134.9

   

133.9

   

  Accounts payable to associated companies

             

47.7

   

25.5

   

  Capital lease obligations due within one year

             

4.7

   

4.7

   

  Taxes accrued

             

67.8

   

50.9

   

  Interest accrued

             

23.0

   

22.0

   

  Other

             

89.9

   

83.6

   

    Total Current Liabilities

             

504.4

   

434.6

   
                           

DEFERRED CREDITS

                         

  Regulatory liabilities

             

119.2

   

126.7

   

  Income taxes

             

710.6

   

711.9

   

  Investment tax credits

             

18.1

   

18.6

   

  Other post-retirement benefit obligation

             

43.9

   

43.8

   

  Other

             

36.9

   

37.4

   

    Total Deferred Credits

             

928.7

   

938.4

   
                           

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

                         

  Long-term debt

             

1,198.4

   

1,198.3

   

  Capital lease obligations

             

121.2

   

121.3

   

    Total Long-Term Liabilities

             

1,319.6

   

1,319.6

   
                           

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 4)

                         
                           

SERIAL PREFERRED STOCK

             

27.0

   

27.0

   
                           

SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

                         

  Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized
    400,000,000 shares, issued 100 shares

             

-

   

-

   

  Premium on stock and other capital contributions

             

507.5

   

507.5

   

  Capital stock expense

             

(.5

)

 

(.5

)

 

  Accumulated other comprehensive loss

             

(.7

)

 

(.7

)

 

  Retained income

             

492.7

   

496.4

   

    Total Shareholder's Equity

             

999.0

   

1,002.7

   
                           

    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

           

$

3,778.7

 

$

3,722.3

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements.

43
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

   

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
               

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of Dollars)

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

                         

Net income

           

$

11.5

 

$

9.5

   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

                         

  Depreciation and amortization

             

39.8

   

43.9

   

  Gain on sale of asset

             

-

   

(6.6

)

 

  Deferred income taxes

             

.3

   

(6.8

)

 

  Regulatory assets, net

             

(2.1

)

 

(3.5

)

 

  Changes in:

                         

    Accounts receivable

             

(42.6

)

 

26.0

   

    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

             

29.5

   

(17.0

)

 

    Interest and taxes accrued

             

17.9

   

1.9

   

    Other changes in working capital

             

(16.6

)

 

20.8

   

Net other operating

             

(4.0

)

 

2.3

   

Net Cash From Operating Activities

             

33.7

   

70.5

   
                           

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

                         

Net investment in property, plant and equipment

             

(35.4

)

 

(42.4

)

 

Proceeds from sale of assets

             

-

   

22.0

   

Other investing activity

             

1.4

   

-

   

Net Cash Used By Investing Activities

             

(34.0

)

 

(20.4

)

 
                           

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

                         

Dividends to Pepco Holdings

             

(14.9

)

 

(11.8

)

 

Dividends paid on preferred stock

             

(.3

)

 

(.4

)

 

Issuances of long-term debt

             

-

   

275.0

   

Issuances (repayment) of short-term debt, net

             

22.4

   

(107.6

)

 

Net other financing activities

             

(.1

)

 

(2.9

)

 

Net Cash From Financing Activities

             

7.1

   

152.3

   
                           

Net increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

             

6.8

   

202.4

   

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

             

1.5

   

6.8

   
                           

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

           

$

8.3

 

$

209.2

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements.

44
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY

(1)   ORGANIZATION

     Potomac Electric Power Company (Pepco) is engaged in the transmission and distribution of electricity in Washington, D.C. and major portions of Prince George's and Montgomery Counties in suburban Maryland. Additionally, Pepco provides Standard Offer Service, which is the supply of electricity at regulated rates to retail customers in its territories who do not elect to purchase electricity from a competitive supplier. Pepco's service territory covers approximately 640 square miles and has a population of approximately 2 million. Pepco is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pepco Holdings, Inc. (Pepco Holdings or PHI). Because PHI is a public utility holding company registered under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA), the relationship between PHI and Pepco and certain activities of Pepco are subject to the regulatory oversight of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under PUHCA.

(2)   ACCOUNTING POLICY, PRONOUNCEMENTS, AND OTHER DISCLOSURES

Financial Statement Presentation

     Pepco's unaudited financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. Therefore, these financial statements should be read along with the annual financial statements included in Pepco's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. In the opinion of Pepco's management, the financial statements contain all adjustments (which all are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to present fairly Pepco's financial condition as of March 31, 2005, in accordance with GAAP. Interim results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 may not be indicative of results that will be realized for the full year ending December 31, 2005 since the sales of electric energy are seasonal. Additionally, certain prior period balances have been reclassified in order to conform to current period presentation.

FIN 45

     As of March 31, 2005, Pepco did not have material obligations under guarantees or indemnifications issued or modified after December 31, 2002, which are required to be recognized as a liability on its balance sheets.

FIN 46R

    Due to a variable element in the pricing structure of Pepco's purchase power agreement with one entity, Panda-Brandywine, L.P. (Panda PPA), Pepco potentially assumes the variability in the operations of the plants of this entity and therefore has a variable interest in the entity. As required by FIN 46R, Pepco continued to conduct exhaustive efforts to obtain information from this entity but was unable to obtain sufficient information to conduct the analysis required under FIN 46R to determine whether the entity was a variable interest entity or if Pepco was the primary beneficiary. As a result, Pepco has applied the scope exemption from the application of

45
_____________________________________________________________________________

FIN 46R for enterprises that have conducted exhaustive efforts to obtain the necessary information.

     Power purchases related to the Panda PPA in the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were approximately $20 million in each period. Pepco's exposure to loss under the Panda PPA is discussed in Note (4), Commitments and Contingencies, under "Relationship with Mirant Corporation."

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

     The following Pepco Holdings information is for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

   

Pension Benefits

   

Other
Post-Retirement
   Benefits

   
   

2005

   

2004

   

2005

   

2004

   
 

(In Millions)

 

Service cost

$

9.4

 

$

9.6

 

$

2.1

 

$

2.4

   

Interest cost

 

24.3

   

23.8

   

8.4

   

8.3

   

Expected return on plan assets

 

(30.7

)

 

(29.8

)

 

(2.5

)

 

(2.8

)

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

.3

   

.3

   

(1.0

)

 

-

   

Amortization of net loss

 

2.5

   

4.5

   

2.5

   

3.1

   

Net periodic benefit cost

$

5.8

 

$

8.4

 

$

9.5

 

$

11.0

   
                           

     Pension

     The 2005 pension net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $5.8 million includes $2.6 million for Pepco. The 2004 pension net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $8.4 million includes $3.6 million for Pepco. The remaining pension net periodic benefit cost is for other PHI subsidiaries.

     Pension Contributions

     Pepco Holdings' current funding policy with regard to its defined benefit pension plan is to maintain a funding level in excess of 100% of its accumulated benefit obligation (ABO). In 2004 and 2003 PHI made discretionary tax-deductible cash contributions to the plan of $10 million and $50 million, respectively. PHI's pension plan currently meets the minimum funding requirements of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) without any additional funding. PHI may elect, however, to make a discretionary tax-deductible contribution to maintain the pension plan's assets in excess of its ABO. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, no contributions were made. The potential discretionary funding of the pension plan in 2005 will depend on many factors, including the actual investment return earned on plan assets over the remainder of the year.

46
_____________________________________________________________________________

     Other Post-Retirement Benefits

    The 2005 other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $9.5 million includes $3.1 million for Pepco. The 2004 other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $11.0 million includes $4.5 million for Pepco. The remaining other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost is for other PHI subsidiaries.

Effective Tax Rate

     Pepco's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was 44% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit) and the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences partially offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits and certain removal costs.

     Pepco's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was 38% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit, including the benefit associated with the retroactive adjustment for the issuance of final consolidated return regulations by a local taxing authority, which is the primary reason for the lower effective rate as compared to 2005) and the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences partially offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits and certain removal costs.

Related Party Transactions

     PHI Service Company provides various administrative and professional services to PHI and its regulated and unregulated subsidiaries, including Pepco, pursuant to a service agreement. The cost of these services is allocated in accordance with cost allocation methodologies set forth in the service agreement using a variety of factors, including the subsidiaries' share of employees, operating expenses, assets, and other cost causal methods. These intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation and no profit results from these transactions. PHI Service Company costs directly charged or allocated to Pepco for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were approximately $26.2 million and $23.9 million, respectively.

     Certain subsidiaries of Pepco Energy Services perform utility maintenance services, including services that are treated as capital costs, for Pepco. Amounts paid by Pepco to these companies for the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were approximately $2.6 million and $3.5 million, respectively.

     As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Pepco had the following significant balances on its Consolidated Balance Sheets due to and from related parties:

47
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

2005

2004

 

(In Millions)

Payable to Related Party (current)

   

  PHI Service Company

$(15.7)

$(12.9)

  Pepco Energy Services (a)

(32.0)

(12.5)

Money Pool Balance with Pepco Holdings
  (included in short-term debt on the balance sheet)

(36.4)

(14.0)

     

(a)

Pepco bills customers on behalf of Pepco Energy Services where customers have selected Pepco Energy Services as their alternative supplier or where Pepco Energy Services has performed work for certain government agencies under a General Services Administration area-wide agreement.

New Accounting Standards

FIN 47

     In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) published FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations applies to conditional asset retirement obligations as defined and requires that the fair value of a reasonably estimable conditional asset retirement obligation be recognized as part of the carrying amounts of the asset. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005 (December 31, 2005 for Pepco). Pepco is in the process of evaluating the anticipated impact that the implementation of FIN 47 will have on its overall financial position or net results of operations.

(3)   SEGMENT INFORMATION

     In accordance with SFAS No. 131 "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," Pepco has one segment, its regulated utility business.

(4)    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

REGULATORY AND OTHER MATTERS

Relationship with Mirant Corporation

     In 2000, Pepco sold substantially all of its electricity generation assets to Mirant Corporation, formerly Southern Energy, Inc. As part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco entered into several ongoing contractual arrangements with Mirant and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, Mirant). On July 14, 2003, Mirant Corporation and most of its subsidiaries filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (the Bankruptcy Court).

     Depending on the outcome of the matters discussed below, the Mirant bankruptcy could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of Pepco Holdings and Pepco. However, management believes that Pepco Holdings and Pepco currently have sufficient cash, cash flow and borrowing capacity under their credit facilities and in the capital markets to be able to satisfy any additional cash requirements that may arise due to the Mirant bankruptcy. Accordingly, management does not anticipate that the Mirant bankruptcy will impair the ability of Pepco

48
_____________________________________________________________________________

Holdings or Pepco to fulfill their contractual obligations or to fund projected capital expenditures. On this basis, management currently does not believe that the Mirant bankruptcy will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of either company.

     Transition Power Agreements

     As part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco and Mirant entered into Transition Power Agreements for Maryland and the District of Columbia, respectively (collectively, the TPAs). Under these agreements, Mirant was obligated to supply Pepco with all of the capacity and energy needed to fulfill its SOS obligations in Maryland through June 2004 and its SOS obligations in the District of Columbia through January 22, 2005.

     To avoid the potential rejection of the TPAs, Pepco and Mirant entered into an Amended Settlement Agreement and Release dated as of October 24, 2003 (the Settlement Agreement) pursuant to which Mirant assumed both of the TPAs and the terms of the TPAs were modified. The Settlement Agreement also provided that Pepco has an allowed, pre-petition general unsecured claim against Mirant Corporation in the amount of $105 million (the Pepco TPA Claim).

     Pepco has also asserted the Pepco TPA Claim against other Mirant entities, which Pepco believes are liable to Pepco under the terms of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement's Assignment and Assumption Agreement (the Assignment Agreement). Under the Assignment Agreement, Pepco believes that each of the Mirant entities assumed and agreed to discharge certain liabilities and obligations of Pepco as defined in the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement. Mirant has filed objections to these claims. Under the original plan of reorganization filed by the Mirant entities with the Bankruptcy Court, certain Mirant entities other than Mirant Corporation would pay significantly higher percentages of the claims of their creditors than would Mirant Corporation. The amount that Pepco will be able to recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate with respect to the Pepco TPA Claim will depend on the amount of assets available for distribution to creditors of the Mirant entities that are found to be liable for the Pepco TPA Claim.

     Power Purchase Agreements

     Under agreements with FirstEnergy Corp., formerly Ohio Edison (FirstEnergy), and Allegheny Energy, Inc., both entered into in 1987, Pepco is obligated to purchase from FirstEnergy 450 megawatts of capacity and energy annually through December 2005 (the FirstEnergy PPA). Under the Panda PPA, entered into in 1991, Pepco is obligated to purchase from Panda 230 megawatts of capacity and energy annually through 2021. In each case, the purchase price is substantially in excess of current market price. As a part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco entered into a "back-to-back" arrangement with Mirant. Under this arrangement, Mirant is obligated, among other things, to purchase from Pepco the capacity and energy that Pepco is obligated to purchase under the FirstEnergy PPA and the Panda PPA at a price equal to the price Pepco is obligated to pay under the FirstEnergy PPA and the Panda PPA (the PPA-Related Obligations).

     Pepco Pre-Petition Claims

     When Mirant filed its bankruptcy petition on July 14, 2003, Mirant had unpaid obligations to Pepco of approximately $29 million, consisting primarily of payments due to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations (the Mirant Pre-Petition Obligations). The Mirant Pre-Petition

49
_____________________________________________________________________________

Obligations constitute part of the indebtedness for which Mirant is seeking relief in its bankruptcy proceeding. Pepco has filed Proofs of Claim in the Mirant bankruptcy proceeding in the amount of approximately $26 million to recover this indebtedness; however, the amount of Pepco's recovery, if any, is uncertain. The $3 million difference between Mirant's unpaid obligation to Pepco and the $26 million Proofs of Claim primarily represents a TPA settlement adjustment which is included in the $105 million Proofs of Claim filed by Pepco against the Mirant debtors in respect of the Pepco TPA Claim. In view of the uncertainty as to recoverability, Pepco, in the third quarter of 2003, expensed $14.5 million to establish a reserve against the $29 million receivable from Mirant. In January 2004, Pepco paid approximately $2.5 million to Panda in settlement of certain billing disputes under the Panda PPA that related to periods after the sale of Pepco's generation assets to Mirant. Pepco believes that under the terms of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Mirant is obligated to reimburse Pepco for the settlement payment. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2004, Pepco increased the amount of the receivable due from Mirant by approximately $2.5 million and amended its Proofs of Claim to include this amount. Pepco currently estimates that the $14.5 million expensed in the third quarter of 2003 represents the portion of the entire $31.5 million receivable unlikely to be recovered in bankruptcy, and no additional reserve has been established for the $2.5 million increase in the receivable. The amount expensed represents Pepco's estimate of the possible outcome in bankruptcy, although the amount ultimately recovered could be higher or lower.

     Mirant's Attempt to Reject the PPA-Related Obligations

     On August 28, 2003, Mirant filed with the Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking authorization to reject its PPA-Related Obligations. Upon motions filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (the District Court) by Pepco and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), in October 2003, the District Court withdrew jurisdiction over the rejection proceedings from the Bankruptcy Court. In December 2003, the District Court denied Mirant's motion to reject the PPA-Related Obligations on jurisdictional grounds. The District Court's decision was appealed by Mirant and The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Mirant Corporation (the Creditors' Committee) to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the Court of Appeals). On August 4, 2004, the Court of Appeals remanded the case to the District Court saying that the District Court has jurisdiction to rule on the merits of Mirant's rejection motion, suggesting that in doing so the court apply a "more rigorous standard" than the business judgment rule usually applied by bankruptcy courts in ruling on rejection motions.

     On December 9, 2004, the District Court issued an order again denying Mirant's motion to reject the PPA-Related Obligations. The District Court found that the PPA-Related Obligations are not severable from the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement and that the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement cannot be rejected in part, as Mirant was seeking to do. On December 16, the Creditors' Committee appealed the District Court's order to the Court of Appeals, and on December 20, 2004, Mirant also appealed the District Court's order. Mirant and the Creditors' Committee each filed its brief on April 4, 2005. Pepco's and FERC's briefs are due May 19, 2005. Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled.

     As more fully discussed below, Mirant had been making regular periodic payments in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations. On December 9,` 2004, Mirant filed a notice with the Bankruptcy Court that it was suspending payments to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations. On December 13, 2004, Mirant failed to make a payment of approximately $17.9 million due to Pepco for the period November 1, 2004 to November 30, 2004. On December 23,

50
_____________________________________________________________________________

2004, Pepco received a payment of approximately $6.8 million from Mirant, which according to Mirant represented the market value of the power for which payment was due on December 13. At that time, Mirant informed Pepco that it intended to continue to pay the market value, but not the above-market portion, of the power purchased under the PPA-Related Obligations. Pepco disagreed with Mirant's assertion that it need only pay the market value and believed that the amount representing the market value calculated by Mirant was insufficient.

     On January 21, 2005, Mirant made a payment of approximately $21.1 million. Pepco disputed Mirant's contention that the amount paid reflected the full amount due Pepco under these agreements for the applicable periods.

     On January 21, 2005, Mirant filed in the Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking to reject certain of its ongoing obligations under the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, including the PPA-Related Obligations (the Second Motion to Reject). On March 1, 2005 (as amended by order dated March 7, 2005), the District Court granted Pepco's motion to withdraw jurisdiction over the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement rejection proceedings from the Bankruptcy Court. In addition, the District Court ordered Mirant to pay on March 18, 2005, all past-due unpaid amounts under the PPA-Related Obligations. On March 4, 2004, Mirant filed an emergency motion for reconsideration and a stay of the March 1, 2005 order. On March 14, 2005, Pepco filed a response to Mirant's motion.

     On March 16, 2005, the District Court denied Mirant's emergency motion for reconsideration and stay of the District Court's March 1 and March 7 Orders. On the same day, Mirant filed a petition for writ of mandamus, and a motion for stay pending appeal and mandamus review in the Court of Appeals.

     On March 17, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued an Order staying the District Court's Orders of March 1 and March 7, 2005. Accordingly, Mirant was not required to make the payment that was due to Pepco on March 18, 2005 pursuant to the District Court's Orders. On March 28, 2005, in accordance with the Court of Appeals March 17 Order, Pepco, FERC, the Maryland Public Service Commission (MPSC) and Office of the People's Counsel (OPC) of Maryland filed oppositions to Mirant's petition for writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeals. Mirant and the Creditor's Committee filed briefs with the Court of Appeals on April 1, 2005.

     On March 28, 2005, Pepco, FERC, the District of Columbia OPC, the MPSC and the Maryland OPC filed oppositions to the Second Motion to Reject in the District Court.

     On April 11, 2005 the Court of Appeals entered an Order vacating the stay it had ordered on March 17, 2005 and denying Mirant's motions for writ of mandamus and stay pending appeal. On April 13, 2005, Pepco received a payment from Mirant in the amount of approximately $57.5 million, representing the full amount then due in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations.

     Pepco is exercising all available legal remedies and vigorously opposing Mirant's attempt to reject the PPA-Related Obligations and other obligations under the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement in order to protect the interests of its customers and shareholders. While Pepco believes that it has substantial legal bases to oppose the attempt to reject the agreements, the outcome of Mirant's efforts to reject the PPA-Related Obligations is uncertain.

     If Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations, Pepco could be required to repay to Mirant, for the period beginning on the effective date of the rejection (which

51
_____________________________________________________________________________

date could be prior to the date of the court's order granting the rejection and possibly as early as September 18, 2003) and ending on the date Mirant is entitled to cease its purchases of energy and capacity from Pepco, all amounts paid by Mirant to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations, less an amount equal to the price at which Mirant resold the purchased energy and capacity. Pepco estimates that the amount it could be required to repay to Mirant in the unlikely event that September 18, 2003, is determined to be the effective date of rejection, is approximately $185.6 million as of May 1, 2005.

     Mirant has also indicated to the Bankruptcy Court that it will move to require Pepco to disgorge all amounts paid by Mirant to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations, less an amount equal to the price at which Mirant resold the purchased energy and capacity, for the period July 14, 2003 (the date on which Mirant filed its bankruptcy petition) through rejection, if approved, on the theory that Mirant did not receive value for those payments. Pepco estimates that the amount it would be required to repay to Mirant on the disgorgement theory, in addition to the amounts described above, is approximately $22.5 million.

     Any repayment by Pepco of amounts paid by Mirant would entitle Pepco to file a claim against the bankruptcy estate in an amount equal to the amount repaid. Pepco believes that, to the extent such amounts were not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, they would be recoverable as stranded costs from customers through distribution rates as described below.

     The following are estimates prepared by Pepco of its potential future exposure if Mirant's attempt to reject the PPA-Related Obligations ultimately is successful. These estimates are based in part on current market prices and forward price estimates for energy and capacity, and do not include financing costs, all of which could be subject to significant fluctuation. The estimates assume no recovery from the Mirant bankruptcy estate and no regulatory recovery, either of which would mitigate the effect of the estimated loss. Pepco does not consider it realistic to assume that there will be no such recoveries. Based on these assumptions, Pepco estimates that its pre-tax exposure as of May 1, 2005, representing the loss of the future benefit of the PPA-Related Obligations to Pepco, is as follows:

·

If Pepco were required to purchase capacity and energy from FirstEnergy commencing as of May 1, 2005, at the rates provided in the PPA (with an average price per kilowatt hour of approximately 5.9 cents) and resold the capacity and energy at market rates projected, given the characteristics of the FirstEnergy PPA, to be approximately 5.7 cents per kilowatt hour, Pepco estimates that it would cost approximately $6.4 million for the remainder of 2005, the final year of the FirstEnergy PPA.

·

If Pepco were required to purchase capacity and energy from Panda commencing as of May 1, 2005, at the rates provided in the PPA (with an average price per kilowatt hour of approximately 16.8 cents), and resold the capacity and energy at market rates projected, given the characteristics of the Panda PPA, to be approximately 9.0 cents per kilowatt hour, Pepco estimates that it would cost approximately $19 million for the remainder of 2005, approximately $29 million in 2006, approximately $30 million in 2007, and approximately $30 million to $44 million annually thereafter through the 2021 contract termination date.

     The ability of Pepco to recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate in respect to the Mirant Pre-Petition Obligations and damages if the PPA-Related Obligations are successfully rejected will depend on whether Pepco's claims are allowed, the amount of assets available for

52
_____________________________________________________________________________

distribution to the creditors of the Mirant companies determined to be liable for those claims, and Pepco's priority relative to other creditors. At the current stage of the bankruptcy proceeding, there is insufficient information to determine the amount, if any, that Pepco might be able to recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, whether the recovery would be in cash or another form of payment, or the timing of any recovery.

     If Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations and Pepco's full claim is not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, Pepco may seek authority from the MPSC and the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) to recover its additional costs. Pepco is committed to working with its regulatory authorities to achieve a result that is appropriate for its shareholders and customers. Under the provisions of the settlement agreements approved by the MPSC and the DCPSC in the deregulation proceedings in which Pepco agreed to divest its generation assets under certain conditions, the PPAs were to become assets of Pepco's distribution business if they could not be sold. Pepco believes that, if Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations, these provisions would allow the stranded costs of the PPAs that are not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate to be recovered from Pepco's customers through its distribution rates. If Pepco's interpretation of the settlement agreements is confirmed, Pepco expects to be able to establish the amount of its anticipated recovery as a regulatory asset. However, there is no assurance that Pepco's interpretation of the settlement agreements would be confirmed by the respective public service commissions.

     If the PPA-Related Obligations are successfully rejected, and there is no regulatory recovery, Pepco will incur a loss. However, the accounting treatment of such a loss depends on a number of legal and regulatory factors, and is not determinable at this time.

     The SMECO Agreement

     As a term of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco assigned to Mirant a facility and capacity agreement with Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. (SMECO) under which Pepco was obligated to purchase the capacity of an 84-megawatt combustion turbine installed and owned by SMECO at a former Pepco generating facility (the SMECO Agreement). The SMECO Agreement expires in 2015 and contemplates a monthly payment to SMECO of approximately $.5 million. Pepco is responsible to SMECO for the performance of the SMECO Agreement if Mirant fails to perform its obligations thereunder. At this time, Mirant continues to make post-petition payments due to SMECO.

     On March 15, 2004, Mirant filed a complaint with the Bankruptcy Court seeking a declaratory judgment that the SMECO Agreement is an unexpired lease of non-residential real property rather than an executory contract and that if Mirant were to successfully reject the agreement, any claim against the bankruptcy estate for damages made by SMECO (or by Pepco as subrogee) would be subject to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code that limit the recovery of rejection damages by lessors. Pepco believes that there is no reasonable factual or legal basis to support Mirant's contention that the SMECO Agreement is a lease of real property. Litigation continues and the outcome of this proceeding cannot be predicted.

53
_____________________________________________________________________________

      Mirant Plan of Reorganization

     On January 19, 2005, Mirant filed its Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement with the Bankruptcy Court. In that plan, Mirant proposed to transfer all assets to "New Mirant" (an entity it proposed to create in the reorganization), with the exception of the PPA-Related Obligations. Mirant proposed that the PPA-Related Obligations would remain in "Old Mirant," which would be a shell entity as a result of the reorganization. Pepco believes this plan cannot be confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court under the law and has submitted objections to the plan. The plan also did not have the support of any of the creditor's committees in the Mirant bankruptcy.

     On March 11, 2005, Mirant filed an application with FERC seeking approval for the internal transfers and corporate restructuring that will result from its proposed Plan of Reorganization. Mirant must obtain FERC approval for these transactions under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act. On April 1, 2005, Pepco filed a motion to intervene and protest at FERC in connection with Mirant's March 11 FERC filing. On the same date, the District of Columbia OPC also filed a motion to intervene and protest.

    On March 25, 2005, Mirant filed its First Amended Plan of Reorganization and First Amended Disclosure Statement. Pepco is currently analyzing this amended plan.

Rate Proceedings

     Pepco's delivery rates in the District of Columbia generally are capped through July 2007, except with respect to residential low-income customers, for whom rates generally are capped through July 2009. In July 2004, Pepco filed a distribution rate review case with the DCPSC as required by the terms of the Pepco-Conectiv merger settlement approved by the DCPSC to determine whether Pepco's distribution rates would be decreased during the period the rates are capped. In accordance with the terms of the merger settlement, Pepco's distribution rates cannot be increased as a result of this proceeding. On April 7, 2005, the DCPSC approved a settlement of this proceeding, which provides that Pepco's current distribution rates will remain unchanged through the end of the rate cap periods set forth above, except as otherwise provided in the merger settlement, or as may otherwise be required by the Commission or by law.

Divestiture Cases

     District of Columbia

     Final briefs on Pepco's District of Columbia divestiture proceeds sharing application were filed in July 2002 following an evidentiary hearing in June 2002. That application was filed to implement a provision of Pepco's DCPSC-approved divestiture settlement that provided for a sharing of any net proceeds from the sale of Pepco's generation-related assets. One of the principal issues in the case is whether Pepco should be required to share with customers the excess deferred income taxes (EDIT) and accumulated deferred investment tax credits (ADITC) associated with the sold assets and, if so, whether such sharing would violate the normalization provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and its implementing regulations. As of May 1, 2005, the District of Columbia allocated portions of EDIT and ADITC associated with the divested generation assets were approximately $6.5 million and $5.8 million, respectively. In March 2003, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) that is

54
_____________________________________________________________________________

relevant to that principal issue. Comments on the NOPR were filed by several parties in June 2003, and the IRS held a public hearing later in June 2003. As a result of the NOPR, three of the parties in the divestiture case filed comments with the DCPSC urging the DCPSC to decide the tax issues now on the basis of the proposed rule. Pepco filed comments with the DCPSC in reply to those comments, in which Pepco stated that the courts have held and the IRS has stated that proposed rules are not authoritative and that no decision should be issued on the basis of proposed rules. Instead, Pepco argued that the only prudent course of action is for the DCPSC to await the issuance of final regulations relating to the tax issues and then allow the parties to file supplemental briefs on the tax issues. Pepco cannot predict whether the IRS will adopt the regulations as proposed, make changes before issuing final regulations or decide not to adopt regulations. Other issues in the proceeding deal with the treatment of internal costs and cost allocations as deductions from the gross proceeds of the divestiture.

     Pepco believes that a sharing of EDIT and ADITC would violate the normalization rules. If Pepco were required to share EDIT and ADITC and, as a result, the normalization rules were violated, Pepco would be unable to use accelerated depreciation on District of Columbia allocated or assigned property. Pepco, in addition to sharing with customers the generation-related ADITC balance, would have to pay to the IRS an amount equal to Pepco's $5.8 million District of Columbia jurisdictional generation-related ADITC balance as well as its District of Columbia jurisdictional transmission and distribution-related ADITC balance as of the later of the date a DCPSC order is issued and all rights to appeal have been exhausted or lapsed, or the date the DCPSC order becomes operative. As of May 1, 2005, the District of Columbia jurisdictional transmission and distribution-related ADITC balance was approximately $5.8 million.

     Pepco believes that its calculation of the District of Columbia customers' share of divestiture proceeds is correct. However, depending on the ultimate outcome of this proceeding, Pepco could be required to make additional gain-sharing payments to District of Columbia customers, including the payments described above related to EDIT and ADITC. Such additional payments (which, other than the EDIT and ADITC related payments, cannot be estimated) would be charged to expense in the quarter and year in which a final decision is rendered and could have a material adverse effect on Pepco's and PHI's results of operations for those periods. However, neither PHI nor Pepco believes that additional gain-sharing payments, if any, or the ADITC-related payments to the IRS, if required, would have a material adverse impact on its financial condition. It is uncertain when the DCPSC will issue a decision.

     Maryland

    Pepco filed its divestiture proceeds plan application in Maryland in April 2001. Reply briefs were filed in May 2002. The principal issue in the Maryland case is the same EDIT and ADITC sharing issue that was raised in the D.C. case. As of May 1, 2005, the Maryland allocated portions of EDIT and ADITC associated with the divested generation assets were approximately $9.1 million and $10.4 million, respectively. Other issues deal with the treatment of certain costs as deductions from the gross proceeds of the divestiture. In November 2003, the Hearing Examiner in the Maryland proceeding issued a proposed order that concluded that Pepco's Maryland divestiture settlement agreement provided for a sharing between Pepco and customers of the EDIT and ADITC associated with the sold assets. Pepco believes that such a sharing would violate the normalization rules and would result in Pepco's inability to use accelerated depreciation on Maryland allocated or assigned property. If the proposed order is affirmed,

55
_____________________________________________________________________________

Pepco would have to share with its Maryland customers, on an approximately 50/50 basis, the Maryland allocated portion of the generation-related EDIT, i.e. , $9.1 million as of May 1, 2005, and the generation-related ADITC. If such sharing were to violate the normalization rules, Pepco, in addition to sharing with customers an amount equal to approximately 50 percent of the generation-related ADITC balance, would be unable to use accelerated depreciation on Maryland allocated or assigned property. Furthermore, Pepco would have to pay to the IRS an amount equal to Pepco's $10.4 million Maryland jurisdictional generation-related ADITC balance as of May 1, 2005, as well as its Maryland retail jurisdictional ADITC transmission and distribution-related balance as of the later of the date a MPSC order is issued and all rights to appeal have been exhausted or lapsed, or the date the MPSC order becomes operative. As of May 1, 2005, the Maryland retail jurisdictional transmission and distribution-related ADITC balance was approximately $10.4 million. The Hearing Examiner decided all other issues in favor of Pepco, except that only one-half of the severance payments that Pepco included in its calculation of corporate reorganization costs should be deducted from the sales proceeds before sharing of the net gain between Pepco and customers. See also the disclosure above under "Divestiture Cases - District of Columbia" regarding the March 2003 IRS NOPR.

     Under Maryland law, if the proposed order is appealed to the MPSC, the proposed order is not a final, binding order of the MPSC and further action by the MPSC is required with respect to this matter. Pepco has appealed the Hearing Examiner's decision on the treatment of EDIT and ADITC and corporate reorganization costs to the MPSC. Pepco cannot predict what the outcome of the appeal will be or when the appeal might be decided. Pepco believes that its calculation of the Maryland customers' share of divestiture proceeds is correct. However, depending on the ultimate outcome of this proceeding, Pepco could be required to share with its customers approximately 50 percent of the EDIT and ADITC balances described above and make additional gain-sharing payments related to the disallowed severance payments. Such additional payments would be charged to expense in the quarter and year in which a final decision is rendered and could have a material adverse effect on results of operations for those periods. However, neither PHI nor Pepco believes that additional gain-sharing payments, if any, or the ADITC-related payments to the IRS, if required, would have a material adverse impact on its financial condition.

SOS and Default Service Proceedings

     District of Columbia

     As more fully described in Note (12), Commitments and Contingencies, to the financial statements of the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K, in a proceeding initiated by the DCPSC to consider issues relating to (a) the establishment of terms and conditions for providing SOS in the District of Columbia after Pepco's obligation to provide SOS terminated on February 7, 2005, and (b) the selection of a new SOS provider, the DCPSC issued an order in March 2004 adopting the wholesale SOS model. Under this model, Pepco would continue to be the SOS provider in the District of Columbia after February 7, 2005. This March 2004 order, as amended by a DCPSC order issued in July 2004, also extended Pepco's obligation to provide SOS at market rates for up to an additional 76 months for small commercial and residential customers, and for an additional 28 months for large commercial customers.

     In August 2004, the DCPSC issued an order approving administrative charges including an average margin for Pepco of approximately $0.00248 per kilowatt hour, calculated based on total sales to residential, small and large commercial District of Columbia SOS customers over the

56
_____________________________________________________________________________

twelve months ended December 31, 2003. Because margins vary by customer class, the actual average margin over any given time period will depend on the amount of electricity used by the respective classes of customers over the time period. The administrative charges went into effect for Pepco's District of Columbia SOS sales on February 8, 2005. Pepco completed the first competitive procurement process for District of Columbia SOS at the end of October and filed the proposed new SOS rates with the DCPSC on November 3, 2004.

     The TPA with Mirant under which Pepco obtained the fixed-rate DC SOS supply ended on January 22, 2005, while the new SOS supply contracts with the winning bidders in the competitive procurement process began on February 1, 2005. Pepco procured power separately on the market for next-day deliveries to cover the period from January 23 through January 31, 2005, before the new District of Columbia SOS contracts began. Consequently, Pepco had to pay the difference between the procurement cost of power on the market for next-day deliveries and the current District of Columbia SOS rates charged to customers during the period from January 23 through January 31, 2005. In addition, because the new District of Columbia SOS rates did not go into effect until February 8, 2005, Pepco had to pay the difference between the procurement cost of power under the new District of Columbia SOS contracts and the District of Columbia SOS rates charged to customers for the period from February 1 to February 7, 2005. The total amount of the difference is estimated to be approximately $8.7 million. This difference, however, will be included in the calculation of the Generation Procurement Credit (GPC) for the District of Columbia for the period February 8, 2004 through February 7, 2005. The GPC provides for a sharing between Pepco's customers and shareholders, on an annual basis, of any margins, but not losses, that Pepco earned providing SOS in the District of Columbia during the four-year period from February 8, 2001 through February 7, 2005. Currently, based on the rates paid by Pepco to Mirant under the TPA Settlement, there is no customer sharing. However, in the event that Pepco were to ultimately realize a significant recovery from the Mirant bankruptcy estate associated with the TPA Settlement, the GPC would be recalculated, and the amount of customer sharing with respect to such recovery would be reduced because of the $8.7 million loss being included in the GPC calculation.

     Maryland

     Under a settlement approved by the MPSC in April 2003, Pepco is required to provide SOS at market rates to residential and small commercial customers through May 2008, to medium-sized commercial customers through May 2006, and to large commercial customers through May 2005. In accordance with the settlement, Pepco purchases the power supply required to satisfy its market rate SOS obligations from wholesale suppliers under contracts entered into pursuant to a competitive bid procedure approved by the MPSC. Pepco is entitled to recover from its SOS customers the cost of the SOS supply plus an average margin of $0.002 per kilowatt hour, calculated based on total sales to residential, small and large commercial Maryland SOS customers over the twelve months ended December 31, 2003. Because margins vary by customer class, the actual average margin over any given time period will depend on the amount of electricity used by the respective classes of customers over the time period.

General Litigation

     During 1993, Pepco was served with Amended Complaints filed in the state Circuit Courts of Prince George's County, Baltimore City and Baltimore County, Maryland in separate ongoing, consolidated proceedings known as "In re: Personal Injury Asbestos Case." Pepco and other

57
_____________________________________________________________________________

corporate entities were brought into these cases on a theory of premises liability. Under this theory, plaintiffs argue that Pepco was negligent in not providing a safe work environment for employees or its contractors, who allegedly were exposed to asbestos while working on Pepco's property. Initially, a total of approximately 448 individual plaintiffs added Pepco to their complaints. While the pleadings are not entirely clear, it appears that each plaintiff sought $2 million in compensatory damages and $4 million in punitive damages from each defendant.

     Since the initial filings in 1993, additional individual suits have been filed against Pepco, and significant numbers of cases have been dismissed. As a result of two motions to dismiss, numerous hearings and meetings and one motion for summary judgment, Pepco has had approximately 400 of these cases successfully dismissed with prejudice, either voluntarily by the plaintiff or by the court. Of the approximately 250 remaining asbestos cases pending against Pepco, approximately 85 cases were filed after December 19, 2000, and have been tendered to Mirant for defense and indemnification pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement.

     While the aggregate amount of monetary damages sought in the remaining suits (excluding those tendered to Mirant) exceeds $400 million, Pepco believes the amounts claimed by current plaintiffs are greatly exaggerated. The amount of total liability, if any, and any related insurance recovery cannot be determined at this time; however, based on information and relevant circumstances known at this time, Pepco does not believe these suits will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition. However, if an unfavorable decision were rendered against Pepco, it could have a material adverse effect on Pepco's and PHI's results of operations.

Environmental Litigation

     Pepco is subject to regulation by various federal, regional, state, and local authorities with respect to the environmental effects of its operations, including air and water quality control, solid and hazardous waste disposal, and limitations on land use. In addition, federal and state statutes authorize governmental agencies to compel responsible parties to clean up certain abandoned or unremediated hazardous waste sites. Pepco may incur costs to clean up currently or formerly owned facilities or sites found to be contaminated, as well as other facilities or sites that may have been contaminated due to past disposal practices.

     In October 1995, Pepco received notice from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that it, along with several hundred other companies, might be a potentially responsible party (PRP) in connection with the Spectron Superfund Site in Elkton, Maryland. The site was operated as a hazardous waste disposal, recycling and processing facility from 1961 to 1988.

     In August 2001, Pepco entered into a consent decree for de minimis parties with EPA to resolve its liability at this site. Under the terms of the consent decree, which was approved by the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in March 2003, Pepco made de minimis payments to the United States and a group of PRPs. In return, those parties agreed not to sue Pepco for past and future costs of remediation at the site and the United States will also provide protection against third-party claims for contributions related to response actions at the site. The consent decree does not cover any damages to natural resources. However, Pepco believes that any liability that it might incur due to natural resource damage at this site would not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

58
_____________________________________________________________________________

     In the early 1970s, Pepco sold scrap transformers, some of which may have contained some level of PCBs, to a metal reclaimer operating at the Metal Bank/Cottman Avenue site in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, owned by a nonaffiliated company. In December 1987, Pepco was notified by EPA that it, along with a number of other utilities and non-utilities, was a PRP in connection with the PCB contamination at the site.

     In October 1994, a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study including a number of possible remedies was submitted to the EPA. In December 1997, the EPA issued a Record of Decision that set forth a selected remedial action plan with estimated implementation costs of approximately $17 million. In June 1998, the EPA issued a unilateral administrative order to Pepco and 12 other PRPs to conduct the design and actions called for in its decision. In May 2003, two of the potentially liable owner/operator entities filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In October 2003, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed a Reorganization Plan that incorporates the terms of a settlement among the debtors, the United States and a group of utility PRPs including Pepco. Under the settlement, the reorganized entity/site owner will pay a total of $13.25 million to remediate the site.

     As of May 1, 2005, Pepco had accrued $1.7 million to meet its liability for a site remedy. At the present time, it is not possible to estimate the total extent of EPA's administrative and oversight costs or the expense associated with a site remedy ultimately implemented. However, Pepco believes that its liability at this site will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

(5)   SUBSEQUENT EVENT (DEBT)

     On May 5, 2005, Pepco Holdings, Pepco, DPL and ACE entered into a five-year credit agreement with an aggregate borrowing limit of $1.2 billion. This agreement replaces a $650 million five-year credit agreement that was entered into in July 2004 and a $550 million three-year credit agreement entered into in July 2003. Pepco Holdings' credit limit under this agreement is $700 million.  The credit limit of each of Pepco, DPL and ACE is the lower of $300 million and the maximum amount of debt the company is permitted to have outstanding by its regulatory authorities, except that the aggregate amount of credit used by Pepco, DPL and ACE at any given time under the agreement may not exceed $500 million in the aggregate. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the companies are entitled to request increases in the principal amount of available credit up to an aggregate increase of $300 million, with any such increase proportionately increasing the credit limit of each of the respective borrowers and the $300 million sublimits for each of Pepco, DPL and ACE.  The interest rate payable by the respective companies on utilized funds will be based on a pricing schedule determined by the credit rating of the borrower. The indebtedness incurred under the Credit Agreement is unsecured.

     The credit agreement is intended to serve primarily as a source of liquidity to support the commercial paper programs of the respective companies. The companies also are permitted to use the facility to borrow funds for general corporate purposes and issue letters of credit. In order for a borrower to use the facility, certain representations and warranties made by the borrower at the time the credit agreement was entered into also must be true at the time the facility is utilized, and the borrower must be in compliance with specified covenants, including the financial covenant described below. However, a material adverse change in the borrower's business, property, or financial condition subsequent to the entry into the credit agreement is not

59
_____________________________________________________________________________

a condition to the availability of credit under the facility. Among the covenants contained in the credit agreement are (i) the requirement that each borrowing company maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization of 65% or less, computed in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, (ii) a restriction on sales or other dispositions of assets, other than sales and dispositions permitted by the credit agreement and (iii) a restriction on the incurrence of liens on the assets of a borrower or any of its significant subsidiaries other than liens permitted by the credit agreement.   The failure to satisfy any of the covenants or the occurrence of specified events that constitute events of default that could result in the acceleration of repayment obligations of the borrower. The events of default include (i) the failure of any borrowing company or any of its significant subsidiaries to pay when due, or the acceleration of, certain indebtedness under other borrowing arrangements, (ii) certain bankruptcy events, judgments or decrees against any borrowing company or its significant subsidiaries, and (iii) a change in control (as defined in the credit agreement) of Pepco Holdings or the failure of Pepco Holdings to own all of the voting stock of Pepco, DPL and ACE. The agreement does not include any ratings triggers.

 

 

 

 

 

60
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 

 

 

 

 

61
_____________________________________________________________________________

DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)

   

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
               

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of Dollars)

 
                           

Operating Revenue

                         

  Electric

           

$

258.6

 

$

250.8

   

  Natural Gas

             

111.7

   

99.9

   

     Total Operating Revenue

             

370.3

   

350.7

   
                           

Operating Expenses

                         

  Fuel and purchased energy

             

162.2

   

157.8

   

  Gas purchased

             

85.1

   

73.7

   

  Other operation and maintenance

             

42.4

   

46.1

   

  Depreciation and amortization

19.0

18.1

  Other taxes

9.4

9.0

     Total Operating Expenses

318.1

304.7

                           

Operating Income

             

52.2

   

46.0

   

Other Income (Expenses)

                         

  Interest and dividend income

             

.2

   

.1

   

  Interest expense

             

(8.6

)

 

(9.0

)

 

  Other income

             

.5

   

1.0

   

     Total Other Expenses

(7.9

)

(7.9

)

Income Before Income Tax Expense

44.3

38.1

Income Tax Expense

             

20.5

   

15.7

   
                           

Net Income

23.8

22.4

Dividends on Redeemable Serial Preferred Stock

.3

.2

Earnings Available for Common Stock

23.5

22.2

Retained Income at Beginning of Period

364.7

367.4

Dividends paid to Pepco Holdings

(24.4

)

(22.1

)

Retained Income at End of Period

$

363.8

$

367.5

                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements.

62
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

   

March 31,

December 31,

 

ASSETS

             

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of Dollars)

 
                           

CURRENT ASSETS

                         

  Cash and cash equivalents

           

$

4.5

 

$

3.7

   

  Restricted cash

             

-

   

4.8

   

  Accounts receivable, less allowance for
    uncollectible accounts of $9.3 million
    and $8.7 million, respectively

             

186.8

   

174.7

   

  Fuel, materials and supplies-at average cost

             

20.6

   

38.4

   

  Prepaid expenses and other

             

20.7

   

11.6

   

    Total Current Assets

             

232.6

   

233.2

   
                           

INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS

                         

  Goodwill

             

48.5

   

48.5

   

  Regulatory assets

             

127.1

   

140.3

   

  Prepaid pension expense

             

206.5

   

204.7

   

  Other

             

29.1

   

29.8

   

    Total Investments and Other Assets

             

411.2

   

423.3

   
                           

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

                         

  Property, plant and equipment

             

2,323.9

   

2,303.4

   

  Accumulated depreciation

             

(766.3

)

 

(755.0

)

 

    Net Property, Plant and Equipment

             

1,557.6

   

1,548.4

   
                           

    TOTAL ASSETS

           

$

2,201.4

 

$

2,204.9

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements.

63
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

   

March 31,

December 31,

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

             

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of dollars, except shares)

 
                           

CURRENT LIABILITIES

                         

  Short-term debt

           

$

114.8

 

$

137.0

   

  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

             

59.2

   

59.7

   

  Accounts payable due to associated companies

             

39.6

   

46.3

   

  Capital lease obligations due within one year

             

.2

   

.2

   

  Taxes accrued

             

38.9

   

6.6

   

  Interest accrued

             

9.7

   

6.3

   

  Other

             

48.0

   

60.9

   

    Total Current Liabilities

             

310.4

   

317.0

   
                           

DEFERRED CREDITS

                         

  Regulatory liabilities

             

231.9

   

220.6

   

  Income taxes

             

430.5

   

430.9

   

  Investment tax credits

             

11.4

   

11.7

   

  Above-market purchased energy contracts and other
     electric restructuring liabilities

             

28.3

   

30.6

   

  Other

             

28.3

   

32.5

   

    Total Deferred Credits

             

730.4

   

726.3

   
                           

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

                         

  Long-term debt

             

539.6

   

539.6

   

  Capital lease obligations

             

.1

   

.2

   

    Total Long-Term Liabilities

             

539.7

   

539.8

   
                           

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 4)

                         
                           

REDEEMABLE SERIAL PREFERRED STOCK

             

21.7

   

21.7

   
                           

SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

                         

  Common stock, $2.25 par value, authorized
    1,000,000 shares, issued 1,000 shares

             

-

   

-

   

  Premium on stock and other capital contributions

             

245.4

   

245.4

   

  Capital stock expense

             

(10.0

)

 

(10.0

)

 

  Retained income

             

363.8

   

364.7

   

    Total Shareholder's Equity

             

599.2

   

600.1

   
                           

    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

           

$

2,201.4

 

$

2,204.9

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements.

64
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

   

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
               

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of Dollars)

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

                         

Net income

           

$

23.8

 

$

22.4

   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

                         

  Depreciation and amortization

             

19.0

   

18.1

   

  Deferred income taxes

             

(3.4

)

 

1.7

   

  Regulatory assets, net

             

22.1

   

4.5

   

  Changes in:

                         

    Accounts receivable

             

(12.1

)

 

(.4

)

 

    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

             

(16.6

)

 

(22.3

)

 

    Interest and taxes accrued

             

35.6

   

21.3

   

Net other operating

             

.4

   

15.9

   

Net Cash From Operating Activities

             

68.8

   

61.2

   
                           

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

                         

Net investment in property, plant and equipment

             

(26.0

)

 

(23.3

)

 

Net other investing activities

             

4.9

   

(1.1

)

 

Net Cash Used By Investing Activities

             

(21.1

)

 

(24.4

)

 
                           

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

                         

Dividends paid to Pepco Holdings

             

(24.4

)

 

(22.1

)

 

Dividends paid on preferred stock

             

(.3

)

 

(.2

)

 

Repayment of short-term debt, net

             

(22.2

)

 

(14.4

)

 

Net other financing activities

             

-

   

(.1

)

 

Net Cash Used By Financing Activities

             

(46.9

)

 

(36.8

)

 
                           

Net increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

             

.8

   

-

   

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

             

3.7

   

4.9

   
                           

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

           

$

4.5

 

$

4.9

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Financial Statements.

65
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

(1)   ORGANIZATION

     Delmarva Power & Light Company (DPL) is engaged in the transmission and distribution of electricity in Delaware and portions of Maryland and Virginia and provides gas distribution service in northern Delaware. Additionally, DPL provides Default Electricity Supply, which is the supply of electricity at regulated rates to retail customers in its territories who do not elect to purchase electricity from a competitive supplier. Default Electricity Supply is also known as Default Service in Virginia, Standard Offer Service (SOS) in Maryland, as well as in Delaware on and after May 1, 2006, and Provider of Last Resort service (POLR) in Delaware before May 1, 2006. DPL's electricity distribution service territory covers approximately 6,000 square miles and has a population of approximately 1.28 million. DPL's natural gas distribution service territory covers approximately 275 square miles and has a population of approximately 523,000. DPL is a wholly owned subsidiary of Conectiv, which is wholly owned by Pepco Holdings, Inc. (Pepco Holdings or PHI). Because PHI is a public utility holding company registered under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA), the relationship between PHI and DPL and certain activities of DPL are subject to the regulatory oversight of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under PUHCA.

(2)   ACCOUNTING POLICY, PRONOUNCEMENTS, AND OTHER DISCLOSURES

Financial Statement Presentation

     DPL's unaudited financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. Therefore, these financial statements should be read along with the annual financial statements included in DPL's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. In the opinion of DPL's management, the financial statements contain all adjustments (which all are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to present fairly DPL's financial condition as of March 31, 2005, in accordance with GAAP. Interim results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 may not be indicative of results that will be realized for the full year ending December 31, 2005 since the sales of electric energy are seasonal. Additionally, certain prior period balances have been reclassified in order to conform to current period presentation.

FIN 45

     As of March 31, 2005, DPL did not have material obligations under guarantees or indemnifications issued or modified after December 31, 2002, which are required to be recognized as a liability on its consolidated balance sheets.

66
_____________________________________________________________________________

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

     The following Pepco Holdings information is for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

   

Pension Benefits

   

Other
Post-Retirement Benefits

   
   

2005

   

2004

   

2005

   

2004

   
 

(In Millions)

 

Service cost

$

9.4

 

$

9.6

 

$

2.1

 

$

2.4

   

Interest cost

 

24.3

   

23.8

   

8.4

   

8.3

   

Expected return on plan assets

 

(30.7

)

 

(29.8

)

 

(2.5

)

 

(2.8

)

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

.3

   

.3

   

(1.0

)

 

-

   

Amortization of net loss

 

2.5

   

4.5

   

2.5

   

3.1

   

Net periodic benefit cost

$

5.8

 

$

8.4

 

$

9.5

 

$

11.0

   
                           

     Pension

     The 2005 pension net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $5.8 million includes $(1.3) million for DPL. The 2004 pension net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $8.4 million includes $(.5) million for DPL. The remaining pension net periodic benefit cost is for other PHI subsidiaries.

     Pension Contributions

     Pepco Holdings' current funding policy with regard to its defined benefit pension plan is to maintain a funding level in excess of 100% of its accumulated benefit obligation (ABO). In 2004 and 2003 PHI made discretionary tax-deductible cash contributions to the plan of $10 million and $50 million, respectively. PHI's pension plan currently meets the minimum funding requirements of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) without any additional funding. PHI may elect, however, to make a discretionary tax-deductible contribution to maintain the pension plan's assets in excess of its ABO. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, no contributions were made. The potential discretionary funding of the pension plan in 2005 will depend on many factors, including the actual investment return earned on plan assets over the remainder of the year.

     Other Post-Retirement Benefits

    The 2005 other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $9.5 million includes $2.5 million for DPL. The 2004 other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $11.0 million includes $2.3 million for DPL. The remaining other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost is for other PHI subsidiaries.

67
_____________________________________________________________________________

Effective Tax Rate

     DPL's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was 46% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit), changes in estimates related to tax liabilities of prior tax years subject to audit, and the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences, partially offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits.

     DPL's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was 41% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit), and the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences, partially offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits.

Related Party Transactions

     PHI Service Company provides various administrative and professional services to PHI and its regulated and unregulated subsidiaries, including DPL, pursuant to a service agreement. The cost of these services is allocated in accordance with cost allocation methodologies set forth in the service agreement using a variety of factors, including the subsidiaries' share of employees, operating expenses, assets, and other cost causal methods. These intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation and no profit results from these transactions. PHI Service Company costs directly charged or allocated to DPL for the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were $24.6 million and $25.8 million, respectively.

     In addition to the PHI Service Company charges described above, DPL's Statements of Earnings include the following related party transactions:

 

For the Quarters Ended
March 31,

2005

2004

(In Millions)

Full Requirements Contract with Conectiv Energy Supply for power, capacity
  and ancillary services to service POLR (included in Fuel and purchased energy)

$95.1   

$148.0   

SOS agreement with Conectiv Energy Supply (included in Fuel and purchased
  energy)

11.0   

-   

68
_____________________________________________________________________________

     As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, DPL had the following significant balances on its Balance Sheets due to and from related parties:

   

2005

   

2004

   
   

(In Millions)

   

Receivable from Related Party

             

  King Street Assurance

$

6.7

 

$

6.7

   

  ACE

 

3.2

   

-

   

Payable to Related Party (current)

             

  PHI Service Company

 

(11.0

)

 

(12.6

)

 

  Conectiv Energy Supply

 

(39.3

)

 

(38.5

)

 

  Delmarva Operating Service Company

 

-

 

 

(2.4

)

 

Money Pool Balance with Pepco Holdings
  (included in short-term debt on the balance sheet)

 

(7.3

)

 

(29.5

)

 
               

New Accounting Standards

FIN 47

      In March 2005, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) published FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations applies to conditional asset retirement obligations as defined and requires that the fair value of a reasonably estimable conditional asset retirement obligation be recognized as part of the carrying amounts of the asset. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005 (December 31, 2005 for DPL). DPL is in the process of evaluating the anticipated impact that the implementation of FIN 47 will have on its overall financial position or net results of operations.

(3)  SEGMENT INFORMATION

     In accordance with SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," DPL has one segment, its regulated utility business.

(4)   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

REGULATORY AND OTHER MATTERS

Rate Proceedings

     In October 2004, DPL submitted its annual Gas Cost Rate (GCR) filing to the Delaware Public Service Commission (DPSC). In its filing, DPL sought to increase its GCR by approximately 16.8% in anticipation of increasing natural gas commodity costs. The GCR, which permits DPL to recover its procurement gas costs through customer rates, became effective November 1, 2004 and is subject to refund pending evidentiary hearings. In addition, in November 2004, DPL filed a supplemental filing seeking approval to further increase GCR

69
_____________________________________________________________________________

rates by an additional 6.5% effective December 29, 2004. The additional GCR increase became effective December 29, 2004 and, similarly, is subject to refund pending evidentiary hearings. The DPSC Staff and the Division of Public Advocate filed their testimony on March 7, 2005 recommending full approval of the GCR changes being sought by DPL, including the revisions to the tariff in the original and supplemental filings. An evidentiary hearing was held on May 5, 2005, at which both DPSC staff and the Division of Public Advocate testified that the rates sought by DPL should be approved as filed. A final order addressing both the November 1 and December 29 increases is expected in the second quarter of 2005.

     Pursuant to the April 16, 2002 merger settlement agreement in Delaware, on May 4, 2005, DPL made a filing with the DPSC whereby DPL seeks approval of a proposed increase of approximately $6.177 million in electric transmission service revenues, or about 1.1% of total Delaware retail electric revenues. This proposed revenue increase is the Delaware retail portion of the increase in the "Delmarva zonal" transmission rates on file with FERC under the Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) of the PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM). This level of revenue increase will decrease to the extent that competitive retail suppliers provide a supply and transmission service to retail customers. In that circumstance, PJM would charge the competitive retail supplier the PJM OATT rate for transmission service into the Delmarva zone and DPL's charges to the retail customer would exclude as a "shopping credit" an amount equal to the standard offer service supply charge and the transmission and ancillary charges that would otherwise be charged by DPL to the retail customer. DPL has proposed to begin collecting this rate change for service rendered on and after June 3, 2005, subject to refund.

SOS and Default Service Proceedings

     Maryland

     Under a settlement approved by the Maryland Public Service Commission (MPSC) in April 2003, DPL is required to provide SOS supply at market rates to residential and small commercial customers through May 2008, to medium-sized commercial customers through May 2006, and to large commercial customers through May 2005. In accordance with the settlement, DPL purchases the power supply required to satisfy its market rate SOS obligations from wholesale suppliers under contracts entered into pursuant to a competitive bid procedure approved and supervised by the MPSC. DPL is entitled to recover from its SOS customers the costs of the SOS supply plus an average margin of $0.002 per kilowatt hour, calculated based on total sales to residential, small, and large commercial Maryland SOS customers over the twelve months ended December 31, 2003. Because margins vary by customer class, the actual average margin over any given time period will depend on the amount of electricity used by the respective classes of customers over the time period.

      Virginia

     Under amendments to the Virginia Electric Utility Restructuring Act implemented in March 2004, DPL is obligated to offer default service to customers in Virginia for an indefinite period until relieved of that obligation by the Virginia State Corporation Commission (VSCC). DPL currently obtains all of the energy and capacity needed to fulfill its default service obligations in Virginia under a supply agreement with a subsidiary of Conectiv Energy Holding Company (Conectiv Energy) that commenced on January 1, 2005 and expires in May 2006. A prior agreement, also with Conectiv Energy, terminated effective December 31, 2004. DPL entered

70
_____________________________________________________________________________


into this supply agreement after conducting a competitive bid procedure in which Conectiv Energy was the lowest bidder.

     In October 2004, DPL filed an application with the VSCC for approval to increase the rates that DPL charges its Virginia default service customers to allow it to recover its costs for power under the new supply agreement plus an administrative charge and a margin. A VSCC order issued in November 2004 allowed DPL to put interim rates into effect on January 1, 2005, subject to refund if the VSCC subsequently determined the rate is excessive. The interim rates reflected an increase of 1.0247 cents per kwh to the fuel rate, which provide for recovery of the entire amount being paid by DPL to Conectiv Energy, but did not include an administrative charge or margin, pending further consideration of this issue. Therefore, the November 2004 order also directed the parties to file memoranda concerning whether administrative costs and a margin are properly recovered through a fuel clause mechanism. Memoranda were filed by DPL, the VSCC Staff and Virginia's Office of Attorney General. The VSCC ruled in January 2005 that the administrative charge and margin are base rate items not recoverable through a fuel clause. No appeal is planned regarding this filing. A settlement resolving all other issues and making the interim rates final was filed on March 4, 2005, the amount of the final rates being contingent only on possible future adjustment depending on the result of a related proceeding at FERC. The VSCC approved the settlement on March 25, 2005.

     Delaware

     Under a settlement approved by the DPSC, DPL is required to provide POLR service to retail customers in Delaware until May 1, 2006. In October 2004, the DPSC initiated a proceeding to investigate and determine which entity should act as the SOS supplier in DPL's Delaware service territory after May 1, 2006, and what prices should be charged for SOS after May 1, 2006. The process used in Delaware consists of three separate stages. The stage 1 process was constructed to allow the DPSC to determine by February 28, 2005 the fundamental issues related to the selection of an SOS supplier. Stage 2 would resolve issues relating to the process under which supply would be acquired by the SOS provider and the way in which SOS prices would be set and monitored. In Stage 3, these selection and pricing mechanisms would be implemented to determine the post-May 2006 SOS supplier and the post-May 2006 SOS price. On January 26, 2005, the DPSC Staff issued a report recommending to the DPSC that DPL be selected as the SOS supplier, subject to further discussions as to how to establish SOS prices. On March 22, 2005, the DPSC issued an order approving DPL as the SOS provider at market rates after May 1, 2006, when DPL's current fixed rate POLR obligation ends. The DPSC will determine in the future the duration of DPL's market rate SOS obligation and the margin, if any, that it will be permitted to earn in conjunction with providing the SOS. The DPSC also approved a structure whereby DPL will purchase the power supply required to satisfy its market rate SOS obligations from wholesale suppliers under contracts entered into pursuant to a competitive bid procedure.

Environmental Litigation

     DPL is subject to regulation by various federal, regional, state, and local authorities with respect to the environmental effects of its operations, including air and water quality control, solid and hazardous waste disposal, and limitations on land use. In addition, federal and state statutes authorize governmental agencies to compel responsible parties to clean up certain abandoned or unremediated hazardous waste sites. DPL may incur costs to clean up currently or

71
_____________________________________________________________________________



formerly owned facilities or sites found to be contaminated, as well as other facilities or sites that may have been contaminated due to past disposal practices.

     In May 2004, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) invited DPL to enter into pre-filing negotiations in connection with DPL's alleged liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 at the Diamond State Salvage site in Wilmington, Delaware. In the context of the negotiations, DOJ informed DPL that DPL is a de minimis party at the site. In February 2005, DPL entered into a de minimis consent decree with the United States which, if approved by the U.S. District Court, would require DPL to pay $144,000 as reimbursement of the government's response costs, resolve DPL's alleged liability, and provide DPL a covenant not to sue from the United States and protection from third-party claims for contribution.

     In July 2004, DPL entered into an Administrative Consent Order with the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) to perform a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) to further identify the extent of soil, sediment and ground and surface water contamination related to former manufactured gas plant (MGP) operations at the Cambridge, Maryland site on DPL-owned property and to investigate the extent of MGP contamination on adjacent property. The costs for completing the RI/FS for this site are approximately $300,000, approximately $50,000 of which will be expended in 2005. The costs of cleanup resulting from the RI/FS will not be determinable until the RI/FS is completed and an agreement with respect to cleanup is reached with the MDE. Due to project delays, DPL now expects that the completion date for the RI/FS will be in the fourth quarter of 2005.

     In October 1995, DPL received notice from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that it, along with several hundred other companies, might be a potentially responsible party (PRP) in connection with the Spectron Superfund Site in Elkton, Maryland. The site was operated as a hazardous waste disposal, recycling and processing facility from 1961 to 1988. In April 1996 DPL, with numerous other PRPs, entered into an administrative order on consent with EPA to perform an RI/FS at the site. In February 2003, the EPA informed DPL that it will have no future liability for contribution to the remediation of the site.

     In the early 1970s, DPL sold scrap transformers, some of which may have contained some level of PCBs, to a metal reclaimer operating at the Metal Bank/Cottman Avenue site in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, owned by a nonaffiliated company. In December 1987, DPL was notified by EPA that it, along with a number of other utilities and non-utilities, was a PRP in connection with the PCB contamination at the site. In 1999, DPL entered into a de minimis settlement with EPA and paid approximately $107,000 to resolve its liability for cleanup costs at the site. The de minimis settlement did not resolve DPL's responsibility for natural resource damages, if any, at the site. DPL believes that any liability for natural resource damages at this site will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

(5)   SUBSEQUENT EVENT (DEBT)

     On May 5, 2005, Pepco Holdings, Pepco, DPL and ACE entered into a five-year credit agreement with an aggregate borrowing limit of $1.2 billion. This agreement replaces a $650 million five-year credit agreement that was entered into in July 2004 and a $550 million three-year credit agreement entered into in July 2003. Pepco Holdings' credit limit under this agreement is $700 million.  The credit limit of each of Pepco, DPL and ACE is the lower of $300 million and the maximum amount of debt the company is permitted to have outstanding by

72
_____________________________________________________________________________

its regulatory authorities, except that the aggregate amount of credit used by Pepco, DPL and ACE at any given time under the agreement may not exceed $500 million in the aggregate. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the companies are entitled to request increases in the principal amount of available credit up to an aggregate increase of $300 million, with any such increase proportionately increasing the credit limit of each of the respective borrowers and the $300 million sublimits for each of Pepco, DPL and ACE.  The interest rate payable by the respective companies on utilized funds will be based on a pricing schedule determined by the credit rating of the borrower. The indebtedness incurred under the Credit Agreement is unsecured.

     The credit agreement is intended to serve primarily as a source of liquidity to support the commercial paper programs of the respective companies. The companies also are permitted to use the facility to borrow funds for general corporate purposes and issue letters of credit. In order for a borrower to use the facility, certain representations and warranties made by the borrower at the time the credit agreement was entered into also must be true at the time the facility is utilized, and the borrower must be in compliance with specified covenants, including the financial covenant described below. However, a material adverse change in the borrower's business, property, or financial condition subsequent to the entry into the credit agreement is not a condition to the availability of credit under the facility. Among the covenants contained in the credit agreement are (i) the requirement that each borrowing company maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization of 65% or less, computed in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, (ii) a restriction on sales or other dispositions of assets, other than sales and dispositions permitted by the credit agreement and (iii) a restriction on the incurrence of liens on the assets of a borrower or any of its significant subsidiaries other than liens permitted by the credit agreement.   The failure to satisfy any of the covenants or the occurrence of specified events that constitute events of default that could result in the acceleration of repayment obligations of the borrower. The events of default include (i) the failure of any borrowing company or any of its significant subsidiaries to pay when due, or the acceleration of, certain indebtedness under other borrowing arrangements, (ii) certain bankruptcy events, judgments or decrees against any borrowing company or its significant subsidiaries, and (iii) a change in control (as defined in the credit agreement) of Pepco Holdings or the failure of Pepco Holdings to own all of the voting stock of Pepco, DPL and ACE. The agreement does not include any ratings triggers.

73
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 

 

74
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)

   

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
               

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of Dollars)

 
                           

Operating Revenue

           

$

309.3

 

$

322.4

   

Operating Expenses

  Fuel and purchased energy

             

188.1

   

193.6

   

  Other operation and maintenance

             

47.3

   

51.8

   

  Depreciation and amortization

29.9

33.9

  Other taxes

5.3

4.0

  Deferred electric service costs

19.0

15.0

     Total Operating Expenses

289.6

298.3

                           

Operating Income

             

19.7

   

24.1

   

Other Income (Expenses)

                         

  Interest and dividend income

             

.7

   

.5

   

  Interest expense

             

(14.1

)

 

(15.4

)

 

  Other income

             

1.7

   

2.4

   

     Total Other Expenses

(11.7

)

(12.5

)

Income Before Income Tax Expense

8.0

11.6

Income Tax Expense

             

3.0

   

4.8

   
                           

Income Before Extraordinary Item

             

5.0

   

6.8

   
                           

Extraordinary Item (net of tax of $6.2 million)

             

9.0

   

-

   
                           

Net Income

14.0

6.8

Dividends on Redeemable Serial Preferred Stock

.1

.1

Earnings Available for Common Stock

13.9

6.7

Retained Income at Beginning of Period

213.3

159.6

Dividends paid to Pepco Holdings

(7.3

)

(5.7

)

Retained Income at End of Period

$

219.9

$

160.6

                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

75
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

   

March 31,

December 31,

 

ASSETS

             

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of Dollars)

 
                           

CURRENT ASSETS

                         

  Cash and cash equivalents

           

$

4.9

 

$

4.2

   

  Restricted cash

             

11.8

   

13.7

   

  Accounts receivable, less allowance for
    uncollectible accounts of $4.6 million
    and $4.5 million, respectively

             

175.6

   

176.4

   

  Fuel, materials and supplies-at average cost

             

38.5

   

38.1

   

  Prepaid expenses and other

             

5.1

   

4.9

   

    Total Current Assets

             

235.9

   

237.3

   
                           

INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS

                         

  Regulatory assets

             

1,033.1

   

1,069.4

   

  Restricted funds held by trustee

             

8.9

   

9.1

   

  Other

             

23.8

   

24.1

   

    Total Investments and Other Assets

             

1,065.8

   

1,102.6

   
                           

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

                         

  Property, plant and equipment

             

1,838.5

   

1,819.1

   

  Accumulated depreciation

             

(557.8

)

 

(680.0

)

 

    Net Property, Plant and Equipment

             

1,280.7

   

1,139.1

   
                           

    TOTAL ASSETS

           

$

2,582.4

 

$

2,479.0

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

76
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

   

March 31,

December 31,

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

             

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of dollars, except shares)

 
                           

CURRENT LIABILITIES

                         

  Short-term debt

           

$

152.8

 

$

123.4

   

  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

             

85.7

   

85.0

   

  Accounts payable to associated companies

             

15.6

   

12.4

   

  Taxes accrued

             

52.2

   

21.3

   

  Interest accrued

             

11.8

   

14.3

   

  Other

             

33.6

   

35.6

   

    Total Current Liabilities

             

351.7

   

292.0

   
                           

DEFERRED CREDITS

                         

  Regulatory liabilities

             

175.1

   

44.6

   

  Income taxes

             

488.6

   

496.0

   

  Investment tax credits

             

19.2

   

19.7

   

  Pension benefit obligation

             

46.0

   

44.0

   

  Other post-retirement benefit obligation

             

44.7

   

44.7

   

  Other

             

18.9

   

34.4

   

    Total Deferred Credits

             

792.5

   

683.4

   
                           

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

                         

  Long-term debt

             

376.7

   

441.6

   

  Transition Bonds issued by ACE Funding

             

516.2

   

523.3

   

  Capital lease obligations

             

.2

   

.2

   

    Total Long-Term Liabilities

             

893.1

   

965.1

   
                           

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 4)

                         
                           

REDEEMABLE SERIAL PREFERRED STOCK

             

6.2

   

6.2

   
                           

SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

                         

  Common stock, $3.00 par value, authorized
    25,000,000 shares, and 8,546,017 shares outstanding

             

25.6

   

25.6

   

  Premium on stock and other capital contributions

             

294.0

   

294.0

   

  Capital stock expense

             

(.6

)

 

(.6

)

 

  Retained income

             

219.9

   

213.3

   

    Total Shareholder's Equity

             

538.9

   

532.3

   
                           

    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

           

$

2,582.4

 

$

2,479.0

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

77
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

   

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 
               

2005

   

2004

   
     

(Millions of Dollars)

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

                         

Net income

           

$

14.0

 

$

6.8

   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

                         

  Extraordinary item

             

(15.2

)

 

-

   

  Depreciation and amortization

             

29.9

   

33.9

   

  Deferred income taxes

             

(7.6

)

 

(9.9

)

 

  Regulatory assets, net

             

20.7

   

11.6

   

  Changes in:

                         

    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

             

(.2

)

 

(19.9

)

 

    Interest and taxes accrued

             

28.3

   

9.4

   

    Net other operating

             

2.8

   

6.4

   

Net Cash From Operating Activities

             

72.7

   

38.3

   
                           

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

                         

Net investment in property, plant and equipment

             

(23.6

)

 

(25.2

)

 

Net other investing activities

             

1.7

   

.7

   

Net Cash Used By Investing Activities

             

(21.9

)

 

(24.5

)

 
                           

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

                         

Dividends paid to Pepco Holdings

             

(7.3

)

 

(5.7

)

 

Dividends paid on preferred stock

             

(.1

)

 

(.1

)

 

Redemption of debentures issued to financing trust

             

-

   

(25.0

)

 

Reacquisition of long-term debt

             

(19.2

)

 

(7.4

)

 

Repayment of short-term debt

             

(23.5

)

 

-

   

Net Cash Used By Financing Activities

             

(50.1

)

 

(38.2

)

 
                           

Net increase (decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

             

.7

   

(24.4

)

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

             

4.2

   

107.2

   
                           

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

           

$

4.9

 

$

82.8

   
                           

NONCASH ACTIVITIES

                         

Excess depreciation reserve transferred to regulatory liabilities
  (See Note (4) Commitments and Contingencies, under
  "Rate Proceedings - New Jersey")

           

$

131.0

 

$

-

   
                           

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

78
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY

(1) ORGANIZATION

     Atlantic City Electric Company (ACE) is engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity in southern New Jersey. Additionally, ACE provides Basic Generation Service, which is the supply of electricity at regulated rates to retail customers in its territory who do not elect to purchase electricity from a competitive supplier. ACE's service territory covers approximately 2,700 square miles and has a population of approximately 998,000. ACE is a wholly owned subsidiary of Conectiv, which is wholly owned by Pepco Holdings, Inc. (Pepco Holdings or PHI). Because PHI is a public utility holding company registered under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA), the relationship between PHI and ACE and certain activities of ACE are subject to the regulatory oversight of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under PUHCA.

(2)   ACCOUNTING POLICY, PRONOUNCEMENTS, AND OTHER DISCLOSURES

Financial Statement Presentation

     ACE's unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. Therefore, these financial statements should be read along with the annual financial statements included in ACE's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. In the opinion of ACE's management, the consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which all are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to present fairly ACE's financial condition as of March 31, 2005, in accordance with GAAP. Interim results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 may not be indicative of results that will be realized for the full year ending December 31, 2005 since the sales of electric energy are seasonal. Additionally, certain prior period balances have been reclassified in order to conform to current period presentation.

FIN 45

     As of March 31, 2005, ACE did not have material obligations under guarantees or indemnifications issued or modified after December 31, 2002, which are required to be recognized as a liability on its consolidated balance sheets.

FIN 46R

     ACE has power purchase agreements (PPAs) with a number of entities including three Non-Utility Generation contracts (NUGs). Due to a variable element in the pricing structure of the NUGs, ACE potentially assumes the variability in the operations of the plants of these entities and therefore has a variable interest in the entities. As required by FIN 46R, ACE continued to conduct exhaustive efforts to obtain information from these entities but was unable to obtain sufficient information to conduct the analysis required under FIN 46R to determine whether these three entities were variable interest entities or if ACE was the primary beneficiary. As a result,

79
_____________________________________________________________________________

ACE has applied the scope exemption from the application of FIN 46R for enterprises that have conducted exhaustive efforts to obtain the necessary information.

     Net purchase activities with the counterparties to the NUGs in the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were approximately $80 million and $67 million, respectively, of which $71 million and $58 million, respectively, related to power purchases under the NUGs. ACE does not have exposure to loss under the PPA agreements since cost recovery will be achieved from its customers through regulated rates.

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

     The following Pepco Holdings information is for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

   

Pension Benefits

   

Other
Post-Retirement    Benefits

   
   

2005

   

2004

   

2005

   

2004

   
 

(In Millions)

 

Service cost

$

9.4

 

$

9.6

 

$

2.1

 

$

2.4

   

Interest cost

 

24.3

   

23.8

   

8.4

   

8.3

   

Expected return on plan assets

 

(30.7

)

 

(29.8

)

 

(2.5

)

 

(2.8

)

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

.3

   

.3

   

(1.0

)

 

-

   

Amortization of net loss

 

2.5

   

4.5

   

2.5

   

3.1

   

Net periodic benefit cost

$

5.8

 

$

8.4

 

$

9.5

 

$

11.0

   
                           

     Pension

     The 2005 pension net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $5.8 million includes $2.1 million for ACE. The 2004 pension net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $8.4 million includes $2.1 million for ACE. The remaining pension net periodic benefit cost is for other PHI subsidiaries.

     Pension Contributions

     Pepco Holdings' current funding policy with regard to its defined benefit pension plan is to maintain a funding level in excess of 100% of its accumulated benefit obligation (ABO). In 2004 and 2003 PHI made discretionary tax-deductible cash contributions to the plan of $10 million and $50 million, respectively. PHI's pension plan currently meets the minimum funding requirements of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) without any additional funding. PHI may elect, however, to make a discretionary tax-deductible contribution to maintain the pension plan's assets in excess of its ABO. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, no contributions were made. The potential discretionary funding of the pension plan in 2005 will depend on many factors, including the actual investment return earned on plan assets over the remainder of the year.

80
_____________________________________________________________________________

     Other Post-Retirement Benefits

    The 2005 other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $9.5 million includes $2.3 million for ACE. The 2004 other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, of $11.0 million includes $2.5 million for ACE. The remaining other post-retirement net periodic benefit cost is for other PHI subsidiaries.

Medium-Term Note Retirement

     In March 2005, ACE retired at maturity $10 million of 6.67% medium-term notes and $2 million of 6.65% medium-term notes.

Effective Tax Rate

     ACE's effective tax rate before the extraordinary item for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was 38% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit), the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences, change in estimates related to tax liabilities of prior tax years subject to audit, and the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits.

     ACE's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was 42% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit), the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences, offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits.

Extraordinary Item

     On April 19, 2005, a settlement related to ACE's electric distribution rate case was reached among ACE, the Staff of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU), the New Jersey Ratepayer Advocate, and active intervenor parties. As a result of this settlement, ACE reversed $15.2 million ($9.0 million, after-tax) in accruals related to certain deferred costs that are now deemed recoverable. The after-tax credit to income of $9.0 million is classified as an extraordinary item (gain) since the original accrual was part of an extraordinary charge in conjunction with the accounting for competitive restructuring in 1999.

Related Party Transactions

     PHI Service Company provides various administrative and professional services to PHI and its regulated and unregulated subsidiaries, including ACE, pursuant to a service agreement. The cost of these services is allocated in accordance with cost allocation methodologies set forth in the service agreement using a variety of factors, including the subsidiaries' share of employees, operating expenses, assets, and other cost causal methods. These intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation and no profit results from these transactions. PHI Service Company costs directly charged or allocated to ACE for the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were $20.7 million and $22.2 million, respectively.

     In addition to the PHI Service Company charges described above, ACE's Consolidated Statements of Earnings include the following related party transactions:

81
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

For the Quarters Ended
March 31,

 

2005

2004

 

(In Millions)

Purchased power from Conectiv Energy Supply (included in
  Fuel and purchased energy)

$13.3

$  -

     As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, ACE had the following significant balances on its Consolidated Balance Sheets due to and from related parties:

   

2005

   

2004

   
   

(In Millions)

   

Receivable from Related Party

             

  King Street Assurance

$

2.6

 

$

2.6

   

Payable to Related Party (current)

             

  PHI Service Company

 

(9.8

)

 

(10.3

)

 

  Conectiv Energy Supply

 

(4.3

)

 

(4.5

)

 

  DPL

 

(3.2

)

 

-

   

Money Pool Balance with Pepco Holdings
  (included in cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet)

 

-

   

1.7

   
               

New Accounting Standards

FIN 47

     In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) published FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations applies to conditional asset retirement obligations as defined and requires that the fair value of a reasonably estimable conditional asset retirement obligation be recognized as part of the carrying amounts of the asset. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005 (December 31, 2005 for ACE). ACE is in the process of evaluating the anticipated impact that the implementation of FIN 47 will have on its overall financial position or net results of operations.

(3)  SEGMENT INFORMATION

     In accordance with SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," ACE has one segment, its regulated utility business.

82
_____________________________________________________________________________

(4)   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

REGULATORY AND OTHER MATTERS

Rate Proceedings

     In February 2003, ACE filed a petition with the NJBPU to increase its electric distribution rates and its Regulatory Asset Recovery Charge (RARC) in New Jersey. In December 2003, the NJBPU issued an order also consolidating into this base rate proceeding outstanding issues from several other proceedings. Later in December 2003, ACE filed a Motion for Reconsideration in which it suggested that these additional issues be dealt with in a Phase II to the base rate case to address the outstanding issues identified in the NJBPU's December 2003 order. The parties to the base rate proceeding agreed that a Phase II to the base rate case would be initiated in April 2004. Accordingly, in April 2004, ACE filed testimony with the NJBPU initiating a Phase II to the base rate proceeding, which addressed these additional issues and sought recovery of the $25.4 million of deferred restructuring costs previously transferred into the base rate case (which is also referred to as Phase 1).

     On April 19, 2005, a settlement was reached among ACE, the staff of the NJBPU, the New Jersey Ratepayer Advocate and active intervenor parties. The settlement, if approved by the NJBPU, will resolve issues in both the Phase I proceeding and the other issues referred by the NJBPU to the base rate proceeding and addressed in the Phase II proceeding. No party to either of these proceedings opposes the settlement.

    The proposed settlement will allow for an increase in ACE's base rates of approximately $18.8 million, $2.8 million of which would come from an increase in RARC revenue collections. $16 million of the base rate increase, not related to RARC collections, will be collected annually until such time as base rates change pursuant to another base rate proceeding. The $2.8 million in RARC collections will be collected each year for four years. The $18.8 million increase in base rate revenue will be offset by a base rate revenue decrease in a similar amount in total resulting from a change in depreciation rate, which is further discussed below, similar to what has been adopted by the NJBPU for other New Jersey electric utility companies. Overall, the settlement provides for a net decrease in revenues of approximately $.3 million, consisting of a $3.1 million reduction of distribution revenues offset by the $2.8 million increase in RARC revenue collections mentioned above. The proposed settlement specifies an overall rate of return of 8.14%. The proposed settlement provides for a change in depreciation rates driven by a change in average service lives. In addition, the settlement provides for a change in depreciation technique from remaining life to whole life, including amortization of any calculated excess or deficiencies in the depreciation reserve. As a result of these changes there is a net excess depreciation reserve. Accordingly ACE recorded a regulatory liability in March 2005 by reducing its depreciation reserve by approximately $131 million. The regulatory liability will be amortized over 8.25 years and will result in a reduction of depreciation and amortization expense on ACE's consolidated statements of earnings. While the impact of the settlement will be essentially revenue and cash neutral to ACE, there will be a positive annual pre-tax earnings impact to ACE of approximately $20 million.

     With respect to Phase II issues, which included supply-related deferred costs, the settlement provides for a disallowance of $13.0 million previously recorded to such deferred accounts and specifies the recovery over four years of an adjusted deferred balance of approximately

83
_____________________________________________________________________________

$116.8 million, including a portion of the $25.4 million of costs transferred first into the Phase I proceeding from other proceedings and then ultimately into the Phase II proceeding, offset by the return over one year of over-collected balances in certain other deferred accounts, with the net result being that there will be no rate impact from the deferral account recoveries and credits for at least one year.

     The settlement does not become effective unless approved by the NJBPU. It is likely that the NJBPU will consider the settlement in the second quarter of 2005. While ACE believes it is probable that the NJBPU will approve the settlement, ACE cannot predict with certainty the timing of any NJBPU approval. The settlement does not affect the existing appeal filed by ACE with the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey (the NJ Superior Court) related to the July 2004 Final Decision and Order issued by the NJBPU in ACE's restructuring deferral proceeding before the NJBPU under the New Jersey Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act (EDECA), discussed below under "Restructuring Deferral."

Restructuring Deferral

     Pursuant to a July 1999 summary order issued by the NJBPU under EDECA (which was subsequently affirmed by a final decision and order issued in March 2001), ACE was obligated to provide Basic Generation Service (BGS) from August 1, 1999 to at least July 31, 2002 to retail electricity customers in ACE's service territory who did not choose a competitive energy supplier. The order allowed ACE to recover through customer rates certain costs incurred in providing BGS. ACE's obligation to provide BGS was subsequently extended to July 31, 2003. At the allowed rates, for the period August 1, 1999 through July 31, 2003, ACE's aggregate allowed costs exceeded its aggregate revenues from supplying BGS. These under-recovered costs were partially offset by a $59.3 million deferred energy cost liability existing as of July 31, 1999 (LEAC Liability) that was related to ACE's Levelized Energy Adjustment Clause and ACE's Demand Side Management Programs. ACE established a regulatory asset in an amount equal to the balance.

     In August 2002, ACE filed a petition with the NJBPU for the recovery of approximately $176.4 million in actual and projected deferred costs relating to the provision of BGS and other restructuring related costs incurred by ACE over the four-year period August 1, 1999 through July 31, 2003. The deferred balance was net of the $59.3 million offset for the LEAC Liability. The petition also requested that ACE's rates be reset as of August 1, 2003 so that there would be no under-recovery of costs embedded in the rates on or after that date. The increase sought represented an overall 8.4% annual increase in electric rates and was in addition to the base rate increase discussed above. ACE's recovery of the deferred costs is subject to review and approval by the NJBPU in accordance with EDECA.

     In July 2003, the NJBPU issued a summary order, which (i) permitted ACE to begin collecting a portion of the deferred costs and reset rates to recover on-going costs incurred as a result of EDECA, (ii) approved the recovery of $125 million of the deferred balance over a ten-year amortization period beginning August 1, 2003, (iii) transferred to ACE's pending base rate case for further consideration approximately $25.4 million of the deferred balance, and (iv) estimated the overall deferral balance as of July 31, 2003 at $195 million, of which $44.6 million was disallowed recovery by ACE. In July 2004, the NJBPU issued its final order in the restructuring deferral proceeding. The final order did not modify the amount of the disallowances set forth in the July 2003 summary order, but did provide a much more detailed

84
_____________________________________________________________________________

analysis of evidence and other information relied on by the NJBPU as justification for the disallowances. ACE believes the record does not justify the level of disallowance imposed by the NJBPU. In August 2004, ACE filed with the NJ Superior Court, which hears appeals of New Jersey administrative agencies, including the NJBPU, a Notice of Appeal related to the July 2004 final order. ACE cannot predict the outcome of this appeal.

Proposed Shut Down of B.L. England Generating Facility; Construction of Transmission Facilities

    Pursuant to a September 2003 NJBPU order, ACE filed a report in April 2004 with the NJBPU recommending that the B.L. England generating facility be shut down. The report stated that the operation of the B.L. England facility is necessary at the time of the report to satisfy reliability standards, but that those reliability standards could also be satisfied in other ways. The report concludes that, based on B.L. England's current and projected operating costs resulting from compliance with more restrictive environmental requirements, the most cost-effective way in which to meet reliability standards is to shut down the B.L. England facility and construct additional transmission enhancements in southern New Jersey.

     The terms of an April 26, 2004 preliminary settlement among PHI, Conectiv, ACE, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) and the Attorney General of New Jersey, which are further discussed under "Preliminary Settlement Agreement with NJDEP," below, established emission limits for B.L. England's operations (which would become applicable on October 1, 2008 for Unit 1 and on May 1, 2009 for Unit 2 if B.L. England is not shut down) and required ACE to seek necessary approvals from agencies that may have jurisdiction to shut down and permanently cease operations at B.L. England by December 15, 2007, and to obtain approval to construct necessary substation and transmission facilities.

     In letters dated May and September 2004 to the PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM), ACE informed PJM of its intent, as owner of the B.L. England generating plant, to retire the entire plant (447 MW) on December 15, 2007. PJM completed its independent analysis to determine the upgrades required to eliminate any identified reliability problems resulting from the retirement of B.L. England and recommended that certain transmission upgrades be installed prior to the summer of 2008. ACE's independent assessment confirmed that the transmission upgrades identified by PJM are the transmission upgrades necessary to maintain reliability in the Atlantic zone after the retirement of B.L. England. The amount of the costs incurred by ACE to construct the recommended transmission upgrades that ACE would be permitted to recover from load serving entities that use ACE's transmission system would be subject to approval by FERC. The amount of construction costs that ACE would be permitted to recover from retail ratepayers would be determined in accordance with the treatment of transmission-related revenue requirements in retail rates under the jurisdiction of the appropriate state regulatory commission. ACE cannot predict how the recovery of such costs will ultimately be treated by FERC and the state regulatory commissions and, therefore, cannot predict the financial impact to ACE of installing the recommended transmission upgrades. However, in the event that the NJBPU makes satisfactory findings and grants other requested approvals concerning the retirement of B.L. England and the construction of the transmission upgrades required to maintain reliability in the Atlantic zone after such retirement, ACE expects to begin construction of the appropriate transmission upgrades while final decisions by FERC and state regulatory commissions concerning the methodology for recovery of the costs of such construction are still pending.

85
_____________________________________________________________________________

     In November 2004, ACE made a filing with the NJBPU requesting the necessary approvals for construction of the transmission upgrades required to maintain reliability in the Atlantic zone after the retirement of B.L. England. The NJBPU issued an order on April 21, 2005, which unanimously approved the petition for the construction of the transmission upgrades, including the 230 kilovolt (kV) Cumberland to Dennis line, the138 kV Dennis to Corson line, and the 138 kV Cardiff to Lewis line. The approval states that these lines are necessary even if B.L. England does not shut down. On May 6, 2005, ACE announced that it would again auction its electric generation assets, including B.L. England. ACE intends to construct the transmission upgrades referred to above whether or not B.L. England is sold.

     In December 2004, ACE filed a petition with the NJBPU requesting that the NJBPU establish a proceeding that will consist of a Phase I and Phase II and that the procedural process for the Phase I proceeding require intervention and participation by all persons interested in the prudence of the decision to shut down B.L. England generating facility and the categories of stranded costs associated with shutting down and dismantling the facility and remediation of the site. ACE contemplates that Phase II of this proceeding, which would be initiated by an ACE filing in 2008 or 2009, would establish the actual level of prudently incurred stranded costs to be recovered from customers in rates. Evidentiary hearings for the necessary approvals for construction of the transmission upgrades were held on March 28, 2005. It is expected that the NJBPU will rule on the petition in the second quarter of 2005. ACE cannot predict the outcome of these two proceedings.

Environmental Litigation

     ACE is subject to regulation by various federal, regional, state, and local authorities with respect to the environmental effects of its operations, including air and water quality control, solid and hazardous waste disposal, and limitations on land use. In addition, federal and state statutes authorize governmental agencies to compel responsible parties to clean up certain abandoned or unremediated hazardous waste sites. ACE may incur costs to clean up currently or formerly owned facilities or sites found to be contaminated, as well as other facilities or sites that may have been contaminated due to past disposal practices.

     In June 1992, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identified ACE as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at the Bridgeport Rental and Oil Services Superfund Site in Logan Township, New Jersey. In September 1996, ACE along with other PRPs signed a consent decree with EPA and NJDEP to address remediation of the site. ACE's liability is limited to 0.232 percent of the aggregate remediation liability and thus far ACE has made contributions of approximately $105,000. Based on information currently available, ACE may be required to contribute approximately an additional $100,000. ACE believes that its liability at this site will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

86
_____________________________________________________________________________

     In November 1991, NJDEP identified ACE as a PRP at the Delilah Road Landfill site in Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey. In 1993, ACE, along with other PRPs, signed an administrative consent order with NJDEP to remediate the site. The soil cap remedy for the site has been completed and the NJDEP conditionally approved the report submitted by the parties on the implementation of the remedy in January 2003. In March 2004, NJDEP approved a Ground Water Sampling and Analysis Plan. The results of groundwater monitoring over the first year of this ground water sampling plan will help to determine the extent of post-remedy operation and maintenance costs. In March 2003, EPA demanded from the PRP group reimbursement for EPA's past costs at the site, totaling $168,789. The PRP group objected to the demand for certain costs, but agreed to reimburse EPA approximately $19,000. Based on information currently available, ACE may be required to contribute approximately an additional $626,000. ACE believes that its liability for post-remedy operation and maintenance costs will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Preliminary Settlement Agreement with the NJDEP

     In an effort to address NJDEP's concerns regarding ACE's compliance with New Source Review (NSR) requirements at B.L. England, on April 26, 2004, PHI, Conectiv and ACE entered into a preliminary settlement agreement with NJDEP and the Attorney General of New Jersey. The preliminary settlement agreement outlines the basic parameters for a definitive agreement to resolve ACE's alleged NSR liability at B.L. England and various other environmental issues at ACE and Conectiv Energy facilities in New Jersey. Among other things, the preliminary settlement agreement provides that:

·

contingent upon the receipt of necessary approvals from the NJBPU, PJM, North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and other regulatory authorities and the receipt of permits to construct certain transmission facilities in southern New Jersey, ACE will permanently cease operation of the B.L. England generating facility by December 15, 2007. In the event that ACE is unable to shut down the B.L. England facility by December 15, 2007 through no fault of its own ( e.g. , because of failure to obtain the required regulatory approvals), B.L. England Unit 1 would be required to comply with stringent sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and particulate matter emissions limits set forth in the preliminary settlement agreement by October 1, 2008, and B.L. England Unit 2 would be required to comply with these emissions limits by May 1, 2009. If ACE does not either shut down the B.L. England facility by December 15, 2007 or satisfy the emissions limits applicable in the event shut down is not so completed, ACE would be required to pay significant monetary penalties.

·

to address ACE's appeal of NJDEP actions relating to NJDEP's July 2001 denial of ACE's request to renew a permit variance from sulfur-in-fuel requirements under New Jersey regulations, effective through July 30, 2001, that authorized Unit 1 at B.L. England generating facility to burn bituminous coal containing greater than 1% sulfur, ACE will be permitted to combust coal with a sulfur content of greater than 1% at the B.L. England facility in accordance with the terms of B.L. England's current permit until December 15, 2007 and NJDEP will not impose new, more stringent short-term SO 2 emissions limits on the B.L. England facility during this period. However, in the absence of a consent order or other final settlement document, which the parties continue to negotiate as required by the preliminary settlement agreement, ACE will

87
____________________________________________________________________________

 

need to seek, in July 2005, a renewal of its current fuel authorization, which is scheduled to expire on July 30, 2006.

·

to resolve any possible civil liability (and without admitting liability) for violations of the permit provisions of the New Jersey Air Pollution Control Act (APCA) and the Prevention of Significant Deterioration provisions of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) relating to modifications that may have been undertaken at the B.L. England facility, ACE paid a $750,000 civil penalty to NJDEP on June 1, 2004. To compensate New Jersey for other alleged violations of the APCA and/or the CAA, ACE will undertake environmental projects valued at $2 million, which are beneficial to the state of New Jersey and approved by the NJDEP in a consent order or other final settlement document.

·

ACE will submit all federally required studies and complete construction of facilities, if any, necessary to satisfy the EPA's new cooling water intake structure regulations in accordance with the schedule that NJDEP established in the recent renewal of the New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for the B.L. England facility. The schedule takes into account ACE's agreement, provided that all regulatory approvals are obtained, to shut down the B.L. England facility by December 15, 2007.

·

to resolve any possible civil liability (and without admitting liability) for natural resource damages resulting from groundwater contamination at the B.L. England facility, Conectiv Energy's Deepwater generating facility and ACE's operations center near Pleasantville, New Jersey, ACE and Conectiv will pay NJDEP $674,162 or property of equivalent value and will remediate the groundwater contamination at all three sites. If subsequent data indicate that groundwater contamination is more extensive than indicated in NJDEP's preliminary analysis, NJDEP may seek additional compensation for natural resource damages.

     The preliminary settlement agreement provides that the parties will work toward a consent order or other final settlement document that reflects the terms of the preliminary settlement agreement. ACE, Conectiv and PHI continue to negotiate with the NJDEP the terms of a consent order or other final settlement document.

(5)   SUBSEQUENT EVENT (DEBT)

     On May 5, 2005, Pepco Holdings, Pepco, DPL and ACE entered into a five-year credit agreement with an aggregate borrowing limit of $1.2 billion. This agreement replaces a $650 million five-year credit agreement that was entered into in July 2004 and a $550 million three-year credit agreement entered into in July 2003. Pepco Holdings' credit limit under this agreement is $700 million.  The credit limit of each of Pepco, DPL and ACE is the lower of $300 million and the maximum amount of debt the company is permitted to have outstanding by its regulatory authorities, except that the aggregate amount of credit used by Pepco, DPL and ACE at any given time under the agreement may not exceed $500 million in the aggregate. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the companies are entitled to request increases in the principal amount of available credit up to an aggregate increase of $300 million, with any such increase proportionately increasing the credit limit of each of the respective borrowers and the $300 million sublimits for each of Pepco, DPL and ACE.  The interest rate payable by the respective companies on utilized funds will be based on a pricing schedule determined by the

88
_____________________________________________________________________________


credit rating of the borrower. The indebtedness incurred under the Credit Agreement is unsecured.

     The credit agreement is intended to serve primarily as a source of liquidity to support the commercial paper programs of the respective companies. The companies also are permitted to use the facility to borrow funds for general corporate purposes and issue letters of credit. In order for a borrower to use the facility, certain representations and warranties made by the borrower at the time the credit agreement was entered into also must be true at the time the facility is utilized, and the borrower must be in compliance with specified covenants, including the financial covenant described below. However, a material adverse change in the borrower's business, property, or financial condition subsequent to the entry into the credit agreement is not a condition to the availability of credit under the facility. Among the covenants contained in the credit agreement are (i) the requirement that each borrowing company maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization of 65% or less, computed in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, (ii) a restriction on sales or other dispositions of assets, other than sales and dispositions permitted by the credit agreement and (iii) a restriction on the incurrence of liens on the assets of a borrower or any of its significant subsidiaries other than liens permitted by the credit agreement.   The failure to satisfy any of the covenants or the occurrence of specified events that constitute events of default that could result in the acceleration of repayment obligations of the borrower. The events of default include (i) the failure of any borrowing company or any of its significant subsidiaries to pay when due, or the acceleration of, certain indebtedness under other borrowing arrangements, (ii) certain bankruptcy events, judgments or decrees against any borrowing company or its significant subsidiaries, and (iii) a change in control (as defined in the credit agreement) of Pepco Holdings or the failure of Pepco Holdings to own all of the voting stock of Pepco, DPL and ACE. The agreement does not include any ratings triggers.

 

 

 

89
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 

 

 

90
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

Item 2 .     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
                AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     The information required by this item is contained herein, as follows:

        Registrants

Page No.

           Pepco Holdings

  92

           Pepco

127

           DPL

143

           ACE

150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

91
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
   AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

PEPCO HOLDINGS

GENERAL OVERVIEW

     Pepco Holdings, Inc. (PHI) is a public utility holding company that, through its operating subsidiaries, is engaged primarily in two principal business operations:

·

electricity and natural gas delivery (Power Delivery), and

·

competitive energy generation, marketing and supply (Competitive Energy).

     The Power Delivery business is the largest component of PHI's business. In the first quarter of 2005, the operating revenues of the Power Delivery business (including intercompany amounts) were equal to 61% of PHI's consolidated operating revenues and its operating income (including income from intercompany transactions) were equal to 77% of PHI's consolidated operating income. The Power Delivery business consists primarily of the transmission, distribution and default supply of electric power, which was responsible for 90% of Power Delivery's first quarter 2005 operating revenues, and the distribution of natural gas, which contributed 10% of Power Delivery's first quarter 2005 operating revenues. Power Delivery represents one operating segment for financial reporting purposes.

     The Power Delivery business is conducted by three regulated utility subsidiaries: Potomac Electric Power Company (Pepco), Delmarva Power & Light Company (DPL) and Atlantic City Electric Company (ACE), each of which is a regulated public utility in the jurisdictions that comprise its service territory. Each company is responsible for the delivery of electricity and, in the case of DPL, natural gas in its service territory, for which it is paid tariff rates established by the local public service commission. Each company also provides Default Electricity Supply, which is the supply of electricity at regulated rates to retail customers in its service territory who do not elect to purchase electricity from a competitive supplier. Default Electricity Supply is also known as Default Service in Virginia, Standard Offer Service (SOS) in Maryland and the District of Columbia, as well as in Delaware on and after May 1, 2006, Basic Generation Service (BGS) in New Jersey, and Provider of Last Resort service (POLR) in Delaware before May 1, 2006. The rates each company is permitted to charge for the transmission of electricity is regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). This means that the profitability of the Power Delivery business depends on each company's ability through the rates it is permitted to charge to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on its capital investments.

     Power Delivery's operating revenue and income are seasonal, and weather patterns may have a material impact on operating results. Historically, Power Delivery operations have generated less revenue and income when weather conditions are milder in the winter and cooler in the summer.

     The Competitive Energy business provides competitive generation, marketing and supply of electricity and gas, and related energy management services primarily in the mid-Atlantic region. These operations are conducted through subsidiaries of Conectiv Energy Holding Company

92
_____________________________________________________________________________

(collectively, Conectiv Energy) and Pepco Energy Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, Pepco Energy Services), each of which is treated as a separate business segment for financial reporting purposes. In the first quarter of 2005, the operating revenues of the Competitive Energy business (including intercompany amounts), were equal to 48% of PHI's consolidated operating revenues and its operating income (including operating income from intercompany transactions) was 12% of PHI's consolidated operating income. Of this segment's operating revenues, an amount equal to 14% of PHI's consolidated operating revenues was attributable to electric energy, electric capacity, and natural gas sold to the Power Delivery segment.

·

Conectiv Energy provides wholesale power, capacity and ancillary services in the wholesale markets administered by PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM) and also supplies electricity to other wholesale market participants. Conectiv Energy has a power supply agreement under which it provides DPL with Default Electricity Supply for distribution to customers in Delaware and Virginia. Conectiv Energy also supplies a portion of the Default Electricity Supply for DPL's Maryland load, a portion of ACE's load, as well as load shares of other mid-Atlantic utilities. Conectiv Energy obtains the electricity required to meet its power supply obligations from its own generation plants, under bilateral contract purchases from other wholesale market participants and from purchases in the PJM wholesale market. Conectiv Energy also sells natural gas and fuel oil to very large end-users and to wholesale market participants under bilateral agreements.

·

Pepco Energy Services sells retail electricity and natural gas and provides integrated energy management services, primarily in the mid-Atlantic region. Pepco Energy Services also provides high voltage construction and maintenance services to utilities and other customers throughout the United States and low voltage electric and telecommunication construction and maintenance services primarily in the Washington, D.C. area.

     The primary objectives of the Competitive Energy business are to manage Conectiv Energy's generation assets to match wholesale energy supply with load and to capture retail energy supply and service opportunities in the mid-Atlantic region through Pepco Energy Services. The financial results of the Competitive Energy business can be significantly affected by wholesale and retail energy prices, the cost of fuel to operate the Conectiv Energy plants, and the cost of purchased energy necessary to meet its power supply obligations.

     In order to lower its financial exposure related to commodity price fluctuations and provide a more predictable earnings stream, the Competitive Energy business frequently enters into contracts to hedge the power output of its generation facilities, the costs of fuel used to operate those facilities and its energy supply obligations.

     Like the Power Delivery business, the Competitive Energy business is seasonal, and therefore weather patterns can have a material impact on operating results.

     Over the last several years, PHI has discontinued its investments in non-energy related businesses, including the sale of its aircraft portfolio and the sale of its 50% interest in Starpower Communications LLC. These activities previously had been conducted through Potomac Capital Investment Corporation (PCI) and Pepco Communications LLC, respectively. PCI's current activities are limited to the management of a portfolio of cross-border energy sale-leaseback

93
_____________________________________________________________________________

transactions, with a book value at March 31, 2005, of approximately $1.2 billion. PCI does not plan on making further investments in non-energy related businesses, and will focus on maintaining the earnings stream from its energy leveraged leases. These remaining operations constitute a fourth operating segment for financial reporting purposes.

     For additional information including information about PHI's business strategy refer to Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in PHI's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

EARNINGS OVERVIEW

First Quarter March 31, 2005 Compared to First Quarter March 31, 2004 Results

     PHI's net income for the first quarter ended March 31, 2005 was $55.5 million, or $0.29 per share compared to $51.2 million, or $0.30 per share for the first quarter ended March 31, 2004.

     Net income for 2005 included the (charges) and/or credits set forth below (which are presented net of tax and in millions of dollars). The segment that recognized the (charge) or credit is also indicated.

   

Favorable impact of $5.1 related to the ACE base rate case settlement as follows:

 

Power Delivery

 
 

Ordinary loss from write-offs of disallowance
   of regulatory assets net of reserve

$(3.9)

 

Extraordinary gain from reversal of
   restructuring reserves

   9.0 

 

     Power Delivery aggregate impact

$ 5.1 

     Net income for 2004 included the credits set forth below (which are presented net of tax and in millions of dollars). The segment that recognized the credit (or, if not attributable to a segment, Corporate and Other) is also indicated.

  

An aggregate of $13.2 in tax benefits related to issuance of a local jurisdiction's final consolidated tax return regulations, which were retroactive to 2001. Effects by segment were:

 

Power Delivery

$    .8

 

Pepco Energy Services

    1.5

 

Other Non-Regulated

    8.8

 

Corporate & Other

    2.1

 

     PHI Consolidated

$13.2

     Excluding the items listed above, net income would have been $50.4 million in 2005 and $38.0 million in 2004.

     PHI's net income for the first quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to the first quarter ended March 31, 2004 is set forth in the table below:

 

94
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

               
   

2005

 

2004

 

Change

 
   

(Dollars in Millions)

 

Power Delivery

$

52.3 

$

40.8 

$

11.5 

 

Conectiv Energy

 

3.1 

 

5.0 

 

(1.9)

 

Pepco Energy Services

 

2.4 

 

3.3 

 

(.9)

 

Other Non-Regulated

 

13.6 

 

20.1 

 

(6.5)

 

Corporate & Other

 

(15.9)

 

(18.0)

 

2.1 

 

    Total PHI Net Income

$

55.5 

$

51.2 

$

4.3 

 
               

Discussion of Segment Net Income Variances:

     Power Delivery's higher earnings of $11.5 million are primarily due to the following: a (i) $5.1 million increase related to the ACE base rate case settlement (described above), (ii) $4.2 million increase from the successful implementation of the competitive bid procedure for SOS approved by the Maryland and District of Columbia Commissions effective June and July 2004 and February 2005, respectively, (iii) $3.4 million of lower operation and maintenance costs, attributable primarily to less system maintenance, lower information technology (IT) costs and reduced employee and administrative costs, and (iv) $2.7 million of lower interest expense; partially offset by (v) $3.9 million of lower earnings because of a gain on sale of assets in the first quarter of 2004 resulting from the sale of assets.

     Conectiv Energy's lower earnings of $1.9 million is primarily due to the following: (i) $3.8 million decrease in merchant generation earnings, which resulted primarily from 9.2% lower megawatt hour output; partially offset by (ii) $1.9 million of higher POLR earnings as the result of less load obligations.

     Pepco Energy Services' lower earnings of $.9 million is primarily due to the following: (i) $2.2 million of lower generation from Benning and Buzzard power plants, (ii) $1.5 million related to the 2004 tax benefit (described above) and (iii) $.7 million from its energy efficiency services activity; partially offset by (iv) $3.6 million due to higher earnings from its retail commodity business.

     Other Non-Regulated lower earnings of $6.5 million is primarily due to the following: (i) an $8.8 million decrease related to the 2004 tax benefit (described above) and (ii) $3.6 million due to the gain on sale of aircraft leases in the first quarter of 2004; partially offset by (iii) $4.8 million related to the gain on the sale of PCI's Solar Electric Generation Stations (SEGS) investment and (iv) a $.5 million reduction in interest expense.

     Corporate and Other higher earnings of $2.1 million is primarily due to the following: (i) $3.8 million reduction in net interest expense; partially offset by (ii) an increase of $2.1 million related to the 2004 tax benefit (described above).

95
_____________________________________________________________________________

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

      The accompanying results of operations discussion is for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004. All amounts in the tables (except sales and customers) are in millions.

Operating Revenue

     A detail of the components of PHI's consolidated operating revenue is as follows:

 

2005

2004

Change

 

Power Delivery

$

1,104.7

 

$

1,039.2

 

$

65.5

   

Conectiv Energy

 

509.4

   

587.8

   

(78.4

)

 

Pepco Energy Services

 

352.6

   

310.7

   

41.9

   

Other Non-Regulated

 

20.5

   

21.1

   

(.6

)

 

Corporate and Other

 

(182.4

)

 

(194.7

)

 

12.3

   

     Total Operating Revenue

$

1,804.8

$

1,764.1

$

40.7

      Power Delivery Business

     The following table categorizes Power Delivery's operating revenue by type of revenue.

 

2005

2004

Change

 

Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

$

379.9

 

$

372.3

 

$

7.6

   

Default Supply Revenue

 

596.5

   

549.2

   

47.3

   

Other Electric Revenue

 

16.6

   

17.8

   

(1.2

)

 

     Total Electric Operating Revenue

 

993.0

   

939.3

   

53.7

   
                     

Regulated Gas Revenue

 

92.8

   

81.6

   

11.2

   

Other Gas Revenue

 

18.9

   

18.3

   

.6

   

     Total Gas Operating Revenue

 

111.7

   

99.9

   

11.8

   
                     

Total Power Delivery Operating Revenue

$

1,104.7

$

1,039.2

$

65.5

     Regulated Transmission and Distribution (T&D) Electric Revenue consists of revenue from the transmission and the delivery of electricity to its customers within PHI's service territories at regulated rates.

     Default Supply Revenue is the revenue received from Default Electricity Supply. The costs related to the supply of electricity are included in Fuel and Purchased Energy and Other Services Cost of Sales.

     Other Electric Revenue consists of utility-related work and services performed on behalf of customers including other utilities.

     Regulated Gas Revenue consists of revenue DPL receives for on-system natural gas sales and the transportation of natural gas for customers within PHI's service territories at regulated rates.

96
_____________________________________________________________________________

     Other Gas Revenue consists of off-system natural gas sales and the release of excess system capacity.

     Electric Operating Revenue

Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

$

145.3

 

$

149.2

 

$

(3.9

)

 

Commercial

 

167.1

   

155.1

   

12.0

   

Industrial

 

9.1

   

8.3

   

.8

   

Other (Includes PJM)

 

58.4

   

59.7

   

(1.3

)

 

     Total Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

$

379.9

$

372.3

$

7.6

Regulated T&D Electric Sales (GwH)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

4,768

   

4,901

   

(133

)

 

Commercial

 

6,869

   

6,685

   

184

   

Industrial

 

1,019

   

1,053

   

(34

)

 

Other

 

71

   

71

   

-

   

     Total Regulated T&D Electric Sales

 

12,727

   

12,710

   

17

   

Regulated T&D Electric Customers (000s)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

1,574

   

1,554

   

20

   

Commercial

 

192

   

190

   

2

   

Industrial

 

2

   

2

   

-

   

Other

 

1

   

1

   

-

   

     Total Regulated T&D Electric Customers

1,769

1,747

22

     The ACE, DPL, and Pepco service territories are located within a corridor extending from Washington, DC to southern New Jersey. These service territories are economically diverse and include key industries that contribute to the regional economic base and to PHI's growing T&D revenues.

·

Commercial activity in the region includes banking and other professional services, casinos, government, insurance, real estate, strip mall, stand alone construction, and tourism.

·

Industrial activity in the region includes automotive, chemical, glass, pharmaceutical, steel manufacturing, food processing, and oil refining.

     Regulated T&D Revenue increased by $7.6 million primarily due to the following: (i) $8.0 million increase in tax pass-throughs, principally a county surcharge (offset in Other Taxes), (ii) $4.0 million increase due to growth and customer sales mix, partially offset by (iii) $2.4 million decrease due to unfavorable weather and (iv) $1.3 million decrease related to PJM network transmission revenue. Heating degree days decreased by 2.1% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.

 

97
_____________________________________________________________________________

     Default Electricity Supply

Default Supply Revenue

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

$

262.4

 

$

219.8

 

$

42.6

   

Commercial

 

218.4

   

207.5

   

10.9

   

Industrial

 

28.9

   

33.4

   

(4.5

)

 

Other (Includes PJM)

 

86.8

   

88.5

   

(1.7

)

 

     Total Default Supply Revenue

$

596.5

$

549.2

$

47.3

Default Electricity Supply Sales (GwH)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

4,591

   

4,611

   

(20

)

 

Commercial

 

3,965

   

4,630

   

(665

)

 

Industrial

 

481

   

580

   

(99

)

 

Other

 

53

   

61

   

(8

)

 

     Total Default Electricity Supply Sales

 

9,090

   

9,882

   

(792

)

 

Default Electricity Supply Customers (000s)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

1,523

   

1,478

   

45

   

Commercial

 

176

   

175

   

1

   

Industrial

 

1

   

2

   

(1

)

 

Other

 

1

   

1

   

-

   

     Total Default Electricity Supply Customers

1,701

1,656

45

     Default Supply Revenue increased $47.3 million, not withstanding a decline in sales, primarily due to the following: (i) a $64.0 million increase as the result of higher retail energy rates, the result of the successful implementation of the SOS competitive bid procedure in Maryland beginning in June and July 2004 and in the District of Columbia beginning in February 2005 (offset in Fuel and Purchased Energy and Other Services Cost of Sales), offset by (ii) $13.8 million decrease primarily due to increased customer migration and (iii) $1.2 million decrease related to unfavorable weather.

     Gas Operating Revenue

Regulated Gas Revenue

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

$

56.6

 

$

50.4

 

$

6.2

   

Commercial

 

31.6

   

27.2

   

4.4

   

Industrial

3.3

2.7

.6

Transportation and Other

 

1.3

   

1.3

   

-

   

     Total Regulated Gas Revenue

$

92.8

$

81.6

$

11.2

98
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

Regulated Gas Sales (Bcf)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

4.4

   

4.6

   

(.2

)

 

Commercial

 

2.7

   

2.7

   

-

   

Industrial

 

.4

   

.4

   

-

   

Transportation and Other

 

1.8

   

2.0

   

(.2

)

 

   Total Regulated Gas Sales

 

9.3

   

9.7

   

(.4

)

 

Regulated Gas Customers (000s)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

110

   

108

   

2

   

Commercial

 

9

   

9

   

-

   

Industrial

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

Transportation and Other

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

     Total Regulated Gas Customers

119

117

2

     DPL's natural gas service territory is located in New Castle County, Delaware. Several key industries contribute to the economic base as well as to growth.

·

Commercial activity in the region includes banking and other professional services, government, insurance, real estate, strip mall, stand alone construction, and tourism.

·

Industrial activity in the region includes automotive, chemical, and pharmaceutical.

     Regulated Gas Revenue increased $11.2 million principally due to the following: (i) $12.8 million increase in the Gas Cost Rate due to higher natural gas commodity costs, which took effect November 1, 2004 (offset in Fuel and Purchased Energy and Other Services Cost of Sales), (ii) $.9 million increase due to higher gas base rates due to higher average rates. These increases were partially offset by (iii) $2.5 million decrease in sales due to lower customer usage. Heating degree days decreased 1.4% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.

      Competitive Energy Business

     The following table divides the operating revenues of the Competitive Energy business among its major business activities.

 

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Merchant Generation

$

133.2

 

$

110.8

 

$

22.4

   

POLR Load Service

 

129.0

   

196.8

   

(67.8

)

 

Power, Oil & Gas Marketing Services and Other

 

247.2

   

280.2

   

(33.0

)

 

     Total Conectiv Energy Operating Revenue

$

509.4

 

$

587.8

 

$

(78.4

)

 

Pepco Energy Services

$

352.6

$

310.7

$

41.9

99
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

·

Merchant Generation experienced an increase of $22.4 million primarily due to increased power prices (approximately 16% higher).

·

POLR Load Service experienced a decrease of $67.8 million primarily due to a drop in load of 37% because of the implementation of competitive bidding on wholesale supply in Maryland and Virginia.

·

Power, Oil and Gas Marketing Services and Other decreased by $33.0 million primarily due to lower New Jersey BGS power sales. Many of the 12 month BGS contracts ended in the middle of 2004. Conectiv Energy won fewer bids on load for the 2004-2005 period in the 2004 BGS auction.

     The increase in Pepco Energy Services' operating revenue of $41.9 million is primarily due to higher volumes of electricity sold to customers in the 2005 quarter at higher prices than the corresponding quarter in 2004.

Operating Expenses

     Fuel and Purchased Energy and Other Services Cost of Sales

     A detail of PHI's consolidated fuel and purchased energy and other services cost of sales is as follows:

 

2005

2004

Change

 

Power Delivery

$

651.8

 

$

598.8

 

$

53.0

   

Conectiv Energy

 

462.5

   

537.2

   

(74.7

)

 

Pepco Energy Services

 

325.6

   

287.0

   

38.6

   

Other Non-Regulated

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

Corporate and Other

 

(181.4

)

 

(195.1

)

 

13.7

   

     Total

$

1,258.5

$

1,227.9

$

30.6

    Power Delivery's Fuel and Purchased Energy costs increased by $53.0 million primarily due to the following: (i) a $45.0 million increase related to higher average energy costs, which are reflected in the new Default Electricity Supply rates for Maryland beginning in June and July 2004, for New Jersey beginning in June 2004, and the District of Columbia beginning in February 2005 (offset in Default Supply Revenue), (ii) $11.4 million increase in gas commodity fuel costs (offset in Regulated Gas Revenue), and (iii) $4.4 million increase in costs due to the phase out of the generation procurement credit (GPC) as a result of the new procurement rates, partially offset by (iv) $7.8 million decrease in PJM network transmission costs.

 

100
_____________________________________________________________________________

     The following table divides the fuel and purchased energy and other services costs of sales of the Competitive Energy business among its major business activities.

 

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Merchant Generation

$

78.3

 

$

49.6

 

$

28.7

   

POLR Load Service

 

134.4

   

211.2

   

(76.8

)

 

Power, Oil & Gas Marketing Services and Other

 

249.8

   

276.4

   

(26.6

)

 

     Total Conectiv Energy Fuel and Purchased
        Energy and Other Services Cost of Sales

$

462.5

 

$

537.2

 

$

(74.7

)

 

Pepco Energy Services

$

325.6

$

287.0

$

38.6

     The decrease of $74.7 million in Conectiv Energy's fuel, purchased energy and other services cost of sales is attributable primarily to the following:

·

Merchant Generation costs increased by $28.7 million mainly due to higher fuel costs.

·

POLR Load Service costs decreased by $76.8 million partially due to a drop in load of 37% because of the implementation of competitive bidding on wholesale supply in Maryland and Virginia.

·

Power, Oil and Gas Marketing Services and Other costs decreased by $26.6 million due to lower New Jersey BGS power sales.

     The increase in Pepco Energy Services' fuel and purchased energy and other services cost of sales of $38.6 million resulted from higher volumes of electricity purchased at higher prices in the 2005 quarter to serve customers.

      Other Operation and Maintenance

     PHI's other operation and maintenance decreased by $6.0 million to $192.0 million in the 2005 quarter from $198.0 million in the 2004 quarter primarily due to (i) $4.5 million decrease in Default Electricity Supply costs, (ii) $4.3 million decrease in system maintenance, (iii) $3.0 million lower IT costs, partially offset by (iv) $1.3 million increase in building lease costs, (v) $1.9 million higher Sarbanes-Oxley external compliance costs, and (vi) $1.3 million increase in bad debt expense.

     Depreciation and Amortization

     PHI's depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by $7.1 million to $105.7 million in the 2005 quarter from $112.8 million in the 2004 quarter primarily due to a $4.5 million decrease in New Jersey deferred transitional bond charges and a $2.7 million decrease related to non-regulated assets.

101
_____________________________________________________________________________

      Other Taxes

     Other taxes increased by $9.9 million to $81.9 million in the 2005 quarter from $72.0 million in the 2004 quarter. This increase was primarily due to pass-throughs of (i) $6.9 million higher county surcharge and $1.3 million in higher delivery taxes (offset in Regulated T&D Electric Revenue) and (ii) $2.6 million delivery tax prior adjustments related to the District of Columbia and New Jersey.

     Deferred Electric Service Costs

     Deferred Electric Service Costs (DESC), which relates only to ACE, increased by $4.0 million to $19.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from $15.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The $4.0 million increase represents (i) $4.5 million in regulatory disallowances (net of amounts previously reserved) associated with the April 2005 NJBPU settlement agreement, (ii) $1.1 million in deferral write-offs associated with the NJBPU settlement agreement and offset by, (iii) $1.6 million net under-recovery associated with New Jersey BGS, NUGs, MTC and other restructuring items. Customers in New Jersey who do not choose a competitive supplier receive BGS from suppliers selected through auctions approved by the NJBPU. ACE's rates for the recovery of the costs of supplying this electricity are reset annually. On ACE's balance sheet a regulatory asset includes an under-recovery of $82.5 million as of March 31, 2005. This amount is net of a $47.3 million reserve on previously disallowed items under appeal.

     Gain on Sale of Assets

      During the first quarter of 2004 Pepco sold land for a $6.6 million pre-tax gain and PCI sold two aircraft for a pre-tax gain of $5.5 million.

Other Income (Expenses)

     PHI's other expenses (which are net of other income) decreased $20.3 million to $66.9 million in the 2005 quarter, from $87.2 million in the 2004 quarter. The decrease was due to other income of $8.0 million realized by PCI from the sale of solar energy investments and from lower interest expense of approximately $9.8 million as a result of lower debt outstanding in the 2005 quarter.

Income Tax Expense

     PHI's effective tax rate before extraordinary item for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was 42% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for the difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate are state income taxes (net of federal benefit), changes in estimates related to tax liabilities for prior tax years subject to audit and the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences partially offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits and tax benefits related to certain leveraged leases.

      PHI's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was 18% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit, including the benefit associated with the retroactive adjustment for the issuance of final consolidated tax return regulations by a local taxing authority, which is the primary reason for the lower effective rate as compared to 2005), the flow-through of deferred

102
_____________________________________________________________________________

investment tax credits and tax benefits related to certain leveraged leases partially offset by the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences.

Extraordinary Item

     As a result of the settlement of ACE's electric distribution rate case, ACE reversed $15.2 million ($9.0 million, after-tax) in accruals related to certain deferred costs that are now deemed recoverable.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Capital Structure

     The components of Pepco Holdings' capital structure, expressed as a percentage of total capitalization (including short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt but excluding (i) transition bonds issued by Atlantic City Electric Transition Funding LLC (ACE Funding) in the principal amount of $516.2 million and $523.3 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, and (ii) Pepco Energy Services' project funding secured by customer accounts receivable of $69.5 million and $70.7 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively) is shown below. The transition bonds issued by ACE Funding and the project funding of Pepco Energy Services, which are both effectively securitized, are excluded because the major credit rating agencies treat effectively securitized debt separately and not as general obligations of PHI, when computing credit quality measures. (Dollar amounts in the table are in millions.)

   

March 31, 2005

   

December 31, 2004

   

Common Shareholders' Equity

$

3,405.0

 

39.7

%

$

3,366.3

39.2

%

 

Preferred Stock of subsidiaries (a)

 

54.9

 

.6

   

54.9

.6

   

Long-Term Debt (b)

 

4,989.0

 

58.2

   

5,003.3

58.3

   

Short-Term Debt (c)

 

126.2

 

1.5

   

161.3

1.9

   

Total

$

8,575.1

100.0

%

$

8,585.8

100.0

%

                     

(a)

Represents Serial Preferred Stock and Redeemable Serial Preferred Stock issued by subsidiaries of PHI.

(b)

Includes first mortgage bonds, medium term notes, other long-term debt, current maturities of long-term debt, and Variable Rate Demand Bonds. Excludes capital lease obligations, transition bonds issued by ACE Funding, and project funding of Pepco Energy Services secured by customer accounts receivable.

(c)

Excludes current maturities of long-term debt, capital lease obligations due within one year, and Variable Rate Demand Bonds.

Financing Activity During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005

     In March 2005, ACE retired at maturity $10 million of 6.67% medium-term notes and $2 million of 6.65% medium-term notes.

103
_____________________________________________________________________________

Financing Activity Subsequent to March 31, 2005

     On May 5, 2005, Pepco Holdings, Pepco, DPL and ACE entered into a five-year credit agreement with an aggregate borrowing limit of $1.2 billion. This agreement replaces a $650 million five-year credit agreement that was entered into in July 2004 and a $550 million three-year credit agreement entered into in July 2003. Pepco Holdings' credit limit under this agreement is $700 million.  The credit limit of each of Pepco, DPL and ACE is the lower of $300 million and the maximum amount of debt the company is permitted to have outstanding by its regulatory authorities, except that the aggregate amount of credit used by Pepco, DPL and ACE at any given time under the agreement may not exceed $500 million in the aggregate. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the companies are entitled to request increases in the principal amount of available credit up to an aggregate increase of $300 million, with any such increase proportionately increasing the credit limit of each of the respective borrowers and the $300 million sublimits for each of Pepco, DPL and ACE.  The interest rate payable by the respective companies on utilized funds will be based on a pricing schedule determined by the credit rating of the borrower. The indebtedness incurred under the Credit Agreement is unsecured.

     The credit agreement is intended to serve primarily as a source of liquidity to support the commercial paper programs of the respective companies. The companies also are permitted to use the facility to borrow funds for general corporate purposes and issue letters of credit. In order for a borrower to use the facility, certain representations and warranties made by the borrower at the time the credit agreement was entered into also must be true at the time the facility is utilized, and the borrower must be in compliance with specified covenants, including the financial covenant described below. However, a material adverse change in the borrower's business, property, or financial condition subsequent to the entry into the credit agreement is not a condition to the availability of credit under the facility. Among the covenants contained in the credit agreement are (i) the requirement that each borrowing company maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization of 65% or less, computed in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, (ii) a restriction on sales or other dispositions of assets, other than sales and dispositions permitted by the credit agreement and (iii) a restriction on the incurrence of liens on the assets of a borrower or any of its significant subsidiaries other than liens permitted by the credit agreement.   The failure to satisfy any of the covenants or the occurrence of specified events that constitute events of default that could result in the acceleration of repayment obligations of the borrower. The events of default include (i) the failure of any borrowing company or any of its significant subsidiaries to pay when due, or the acceleration of, certain indebtedness under other borrowing arrangements, (ii) certain bankruptcy events, judgments or decrees against any borrowing company or its significant subsidiaries, and (iii) a change in control (as defined in the credit agreement) of Pepco Holdings or the failure of Pepco Holdings to own all of the voting stock of Pepco, DPL and ACE. The agreement does not include any ratings triggers.

     In May 2005, Conectiv called for early redemption on June 1, 2005, all of the remaining $20 million of 6.73% Series A due June 1, 2006 at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% of the principal amount outstanding and the make-whole call provision, to be determined prior to the call date.

104
_____________________________________________________________________________

Working Capital

     At March 31, 2005, PHI's current assets on a consolidated basis totaled $1.7 billion and its current liabilities totaled $2.3 billion. At December 31, 2004, PHI's current assets on a consolidated basis totaled $1.7 billion and its current liabilities totaled $2.0 billion.

     PHI's working capital deficit results in large part from the fact that, in the normal course of business, PHI's utility subsidiaries acquire and pay for energy supplies for their customers before the supplies are metered and then billed to customers. Short-term financings are used to meet liquidity needs. Short-term financings are also used, at times, to temporarily fund redemptions of long-term debt, until long-term replacement issues are completed.

     A detail of Pepco Holdings' short-term debt at March 31, 2005 is as follows:

As of March 31, 2005
($ in Millions)

Type

PHI
Parent

Pepco

DPL

ACE

ACE
Funding

PES

PCI

Conectiv

PHI
Consolidated

Variable Rate
  Demand Bonds

$

-

$

-

$

104.8

$

22.6

$

-

$

31.0

$

-

$

-

$

158.4

Current Portion
  of Long-Term Debt

300.0

100.0

2.7

93.0

28.0

.2

60.0

300.0

883.9

Current Portion of
  Project Funding
  Secured by Accounts
  Receivable

-

-

-

-

-

5.4

-

-

5.4

Floating Rate Note

50.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

50.0

Commercial Paper

67.0

-

-

9.2

-

-

-

-

76.2

      Total

$

417.0

$

100.0

$

107.5

$

124.8

$

28.0

$

36.6

$

60.0

$

300.0

$

1,173.9

Cash Flow Activity

     PHI's cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized below.

 

Cash Source / (Use)

 
   

2005

   

2004

   
   

(Dollars in Millions)

   

Operating activities

$

168.5

 

$

138.1

   

Investing activities

 

(58.0

)

 

(65.2

)

 

Financing activities

 

(96.7

)

 

125.3

   

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

13.8

 

$

198.2

   
               

     Operating Activities

     Cash flows from operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized below.

105
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Cash Source / (Use)

 
   

2005

   

2004

   
   

(Dollars in Millions)

   

Net income

$

55.5

 

$

51.2

   

Non-cash adjustments to net income

 

119.5

   

96.4

   

Changes in working capital

 

(6.5

)

 

(9.5

)

 

Net cash from operating activities

 

168.5

 

$

138.1

   
               

     Net cash provided by operating activities increased $30.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to increases in other deferred charges and noncurrent liabilities.

     Investing Activities

     Cash flows from investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized below.

 

Cash Source / (Use)

 
   

2005

   

2004

   
   

(Dollars in Millions)

   

Construction expenditures

$

(88.3

)

$

(94.3

)

 

Cash proceeds from sale of:

             

    Other investments

 

23.8

   

-

   

    Marketable securities

 

-

   

8.9

   

    Office building and other properties

 

.4

   

28.5

   

All other investing cash flows, net

 

6.1

   

(8.3

)

 

Net cash used by investing activities

$

(58.0

)

$

(65.2

)

 
               

    Net cash used by investing activities decreased by $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The decrease was primarily due to lower construction expenditures by Power Delivery and higher proceeds from the sales of other investments in 2005, partially offset by asset sale proceeds during 2004 and from proceeds from the sale of marketable securities during 2004.

     Financing Activities

     Cash flows from financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized below.

106
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Cash Source / (Use)

 
   

2005

   

2004

   
   

(Dollars in Millions)

   

Common and preferred stock dividends

$

(47.7

)

$

(43.6

)

 

Common stock issuances

 

7.0

   

7.4

   

Debenture redemptions

 

-

   

(25.0

)

 

Long-term debt issuances

 

-

   

275.0

   

Long-term debt redemptions

 

(20.5

)

 

(44.5

)

 

Short-term debt, net

 

(35.1

)

 

(39.4

)

 

All other financing cash flows, net

 

(.4

)

 

(4.6

)

 

Net cash (used by) from financing activities

$

(96.7

)

$

125.3

   
               

     In the first quarter of 2004 Pepco issued $275 million of secured senior notes with maturities of 10 and 30 years; the proceeds of which were used to redeem higher interest rate securities and to repay short-term debt.

Capital Requirements

     Construction Expenditures

     Pepco Holdings' construction expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2005 totaled $88.3 million of which $85.0 million was related to its Power Delivery businesses. The remainder was primarily related to Conectiv Energy. The Power Delivery expenditures were primarily related to capital costs associated with new customer services, distribution reliability, and transmission.

     Third Party Guarantees, Indemnifications and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     Pepco Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries have various financial and performance guarantees and indemnification obligations which are entered into in the normal course of business to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties as discussed below.

     As of March 31, 2005, Pepco Holdings and its subsidiaries were parties to a variety of agreements pursuant to which they were guarantors for standby letters of credit, performance residual value, and other commitments and obligations. The fair value of these commitments and obligations was not required to be recorded in Pepco Holdings' Consolidated Balance Sheets; however, certain energy marketing obligations of Conectiv Energy were recorded. The commitments and obligations, in millions of dollars, were as follows:

 

 

107
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Guarantor

     
   

PHI

 

DPL

 

ACE

 

PCI

 

Total

 

Energy marketing obligations of Conectiv Energy (1)

$

157.8

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

157.8

 

Energy procurement obligations of Pepco Energy Services (1)

 

7.0

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

7.0

 

Standby letters of credit of Pepco Holdings (2)

 

.6

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

.6

 

Guaranteed lease residual values (3)

 

.7

 

3.1

 

3.1

 

-

 

6.9

 

Loan agreement (4)

 

13.1

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

13.1

 

Other (5)

 

20.4

 

-

 

-

 

2.9

 

23.3

 

  Total

$

199.6

$

3.1

$

3.1

$

2.9

$

208.7

 
                       

1.

Pepco Holdings has contractual commitments for performance and related payments of Conectiv Energy and Pepco Energy Services to counterparties related to routine energy sales and procurement obligations, including requirements under BGS contracts for ACE.

2.

Pepco Holdings has issued standby letters of credit of $.6 million on behalf of subsidiaries' operations related to Conectiv Energy's competitive energy activities and third party construction performance. These standby letters of credit were put into place in order to allow the subsidiaries the flexibility needed to conduct business with counterparties without having to post substantial cash collateral. While the exposure under these standby letters of credit is $.6 million, Pepco Holdings does not expect to fund the full amount.

3.

Subsidiaries of Pepco Holdings have guaranteed residual values in excess of fair value related to certain equipment and fleet vehicles held through lease agreements. As of March 31, 2005, obligations under the guarantees were approximately $6.9 million. Assets leased under agreements subject to residual value guarantees are typically for periods ranging from 2 years to 10 years. Historically, payments under the guarantees have not been made by the guarantor as, under normal conditions, the contract runs to full term at which time the residual value is minimal. As such, Pepco Holdings believes the likelihood of requiring payment under the guarantee is remote.

4.

Pepco Holdings has issued a guarantee on the behalf of a subsidiary's 50% unconsolidated investment in a limited liability company for repayment borrowings under a loan agreement of approximately $13.1 million.

5.

Other guarantees comprise:

 

·

Pepco Holdings has performance obligations of $1.7 million relating to obligations to third party suppliers of equipment.

 

·

Pepco Holdings has guaranteed payment of a bond issued by a subsidiary of $14.9 million. Pepco Holdings does not expect to fund the full amount of the exposure under the guarantee.

 

·

Pepco Holdings has guaranteed a subsidiary building lease of $3.8 million. Pepco Holdings does not expect to fund the full amount of the exposure under the guarantee.

108
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

·

PCI has guaranteed facility rental obligations related to contracts entered into by Starpower Communications LLC. As of March 31, 2005, the guarantees cover the remaining $2.9 million in rental obligations.

     Pepco Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries have entered into various indemnification agreements related to purchase and sale agreements and other types of contractual agreements with vendors and other third parties. These indemnification agreements typically cover environmental, tax, litigation and other matters, as well as breaches of representations, warranties and covenants set forth in these agreements. Typically, claims may be made by third parties under these indemnification agreements over various periods of time depending on the nature of the claim. The maximum potential exposure under these indemnification agreements can range from a specified dollar amount to an unlimited amount depending on the nature of the claim and the particular transaction. The total maximum potential amount of future payments under these indemnification agreements is not estimable due to several factors, including uncertainty as to whether or when claims may be made under these indemnities.

       Dividends

     On April 27, 2005, Pepco Holdings' Board of Directors declared a dividend on common stock of 25 cents per share payable June 30, 2005, to shareholders of record on June 10, 2005.

 

 

109
_____________________________________________________________________________

      Energy Contract Net Asset Activity

     The following table provides detail on changes in the competitive energy segments' net asset or liability position with respect to energy commodity contracts from one period to the next:

Roll-forward of Mark-to-Market Energy Contract Net Assets
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
(Dollars are Pre-Tax and in Millions)
(1)

Proprietary Trading (2)

Other Energy Commodity (3)

Total  

Total Marked-to-market (MTM) Energy Contract Net Assets
  at December 31, 2004

$   .9      

$25.7     

$ 26.6 

  Total change in unrealized fair value excluding
    reclassification to realized at settlement of contracts

-      

2.6     

2.6 

  Reclassification to realized at settlement of contracts

(.2)     

(17.6)    

(17.8)

  Effective portion of changes in fair value - recorded in OCI

-      

32.3     

32.3 

  Ineffective portion of changes in fair value - recorded in earnings

-      

.2     

.2 

  Changes in valuation techniques and assumptions

-      

-     

  Purchase/sale of existing contracts or portfolios subject to MTM

    -      

    -     

     - 

Total MTM Energy Contract Net Assets at March 31, 2005 (a)

$   .7 (4)

$43.2     

$ 43.9 

       

(a) Detail of MTM Energy Contract Net Assets at March 31, 2005 (above)

 

Total  

            Current Assets

   

$111.6 

            Noncurrent Assets

   

  44.6  

            Total MTM Energy Assets

   

 156.2  

            Current Liabilities

   

(49.0)

            Noncurrent Liabilities

   

 (63.3 )

            Total MTM Energy Contract Liabilities

   

(112.3 )

            Total MTM Energy Contract Net Assets

   

$ 43.9 

       

Notes:

(1)

This table reflects $(.3) million (pre-tax) of net assets that existed at the time of Pepco's acquisition of Conectiv that are not reflected in PHI's consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2005 due to purchase accounting.

(2)

The forward value of the trading contracts represents positions held prior to the cessation of proprietary trading. The values were locked in during the exit from trading and will be realized during the normal course of business through the end of 2005.

(3)

Includes all SFAS 133 hedge activity and non-proprietary trading activities marked-to-market through earnings.

(4)

This amount will not be materially sensitive to commodity price movements because it represents positions that have been volumetrically offset almost 100% since the first quarter of 2003.

     The following table provides the source of fair value information (exchange-traded, provided by other external sources, or modeled internally) used to determine the carrying amount of the competitive energy segments' total mark-to-market energy contract net assets. The table also provides the maturity, by year, of the competitive energy segments' mark-to-market energy

110
_____________________________________________________________________________

contract net assets, which indicates when the amounts will settle and either generate cash for, or require payment of cash by, PHI.

     PHI uses its best estimates to determine the fair value of the commodity and derivative contracts that its competitive energy segments hold and sell. The fair values in each category presented below reflect forward prices and volatility factors as of March 31, 2005 and are subject to change as a result of changes in these factors:

Maturity and Source of Fair Value of Mark-to-Market
Energy Contract Net Assets
As of March 31, 2005
(Dollars are Pre-Tax and in Millions) 
(1)

 

Fair Value of Contracts at March 31, 2005

 
 

Maturities

 

Source of Fair Value

2005

2006

2007

2008 and
 Beyond 

Total    
Fair Value

 

Proprietary Trading (2)

           

Actively Quoted (i.e., exchange-traded) prices (2)

$ .7 

$ .7 

 

Prices provided by other external sources (3)

-  

 

Modeled

    -  

    - 

    - 

   - 

    - 

 

      Total

$ .7 

$  -  

$   - 

$  - 

$ .7 

 
             

Other Energy Commodity (4)

           

Actively Quoted (i.e., exchange-traded) prices

$34.6 

$10.2 

$7.0 

$  .5 

$52.3 

 

Prices provided by other external sources (3)

(18.2)

(36.5)

(13.1)

(1.6)

(69.4)

 

Modeled (5)

36.9 

 23.4 

-

   - 

 60.3 

 

     Total

$53.3 

$(2.9)

$(6.1)

$(1.1)

$43.2 

Notes:

 

(1)

This table reflects $(.3) million (pre-tax) of net assets that existed at the time of Pepco's acquisition of Conectiv that are not reflected in PHI's consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2005 due to purchase accounting.

(2)

The forward value of the trading contracts represents positions held prior to the cessation of proprietary trading. The values were locked in during the exit from trading and will be realized during the normal course of business through the end of 2005.

(3)

Prices provided by other external sources reflect information obtained from over-the-counter brokers, industry services, or multiple-party on-line platforms.

(4)

Includes all SFAS No. 133 hedge activity and non-trading activities marked-to-market through AOCI or on the Income Statement as required. As of the second quarter of 2003, this category also includes the activities of the 24-Hour Power Desk.

(5)

The modeled hedge position is a power swap for 50% of Conectiv Energy's POLR obligation in the DPL territory. The model is used to approximate the forward load quantities. Pricing is derived from the broker market.

111
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

     Contractual Arrangements with Credit Rating Triggers or Margining Rights

     Under certain contractual arrangements entered into by PHI's subsidiaries in connection with competitive energy and other transactions, the affected company may be required to provide cash collateral or letters of credit as security for its contractual obligations if the credit rating for long-term unsecured debt of the applicable company is downgraded one or more levels. In the event of a downgrade, the amount required to be posted would depend on the amount of the underlying contractual obligation existing at the time of the downgrade. As of March 31, 2005, a one-level downgrade in the credit rating of long-term unsecured debt of PHI and all of its affected subsidiaries would have required PHI and such subsidiaries to provide aggregate cash collateral or letters of credit of approximately up to $152 million. An additional amount of approximately $225 million of aggregate cash collateral or letters of credit would have been required in the event of subsequent downgrades to below investment grade.

     Many of the contractual arrangements entered into by PHI's subsidiaries in connection with competitive energy activities include margining rights pursuant to which the PHI subsidiary or a counterparty may request collateral if the market value of the contractual obligations reaches levels that are in excess of the credit thresholds established in the applicable arrangements. Pursuant to these margining rights, the affected PHI subsidiary may receive, or be required to post, collateral due to energy price movements. As of March 31, 2005, Pepco Holdings' subsidiaries that engaged in competitive energy activities were in receipt of (a net holder of) cash collateral in the amount of $18.0 million as recorded in connection with their competitive energy activities.

REGULATORY AND OTHER MATTERS

Relationship with Mirant Corporation

     In 2000, Pepco sold substantially all of its electricity generation assets to Mirant Corporation, formerly Southern Energy, Inc. As part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco entered into several ongoing contractual arrangements with Mirant and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, Mirant). On July 14, 2003, Mirant Corporation and most of its subsidiaries filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (the Bankruptcy Court).

     Depending on the outcome of the matters discussed below, the Mirant bankruptcy could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of Pepco Holdings and Pepco. However, management believes that Pepco Holdings and Pepco currently have sufficient cash, cash flow and borrowing capacity under their credit facilities and in the capital markets to be able to satisfy any additional cash requirements that may arise due to the Mirant bankruptcy. Accordingly, management does not anticipate that the Mirant bankruptcy will impair the ability of Pepco Holdings or Pepco to fulfill their contractual obligations or to fund projected capital expenditures. On this basis, management currently does not believe that the Mirant bankruptcy will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of either company.

     Transition Power Agreements

     As part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco and Mirant entered into Transition Power Agreements for Maryland and the District of Columbia, respectively (collectively, the

112
_____________________________________________________________________________

TPAs). Under these agreements, Mirant was obligated to supply Pepco with all of the capacity and energy needed to fulfill its SOS obligations in Maryland through June 2004 and its SOS obligations in the District of Columbia through January 22, 2005.

     To avoid the potential rejection of the TPAs, Pepco and Mirant entered into an Amended Settlement Agreement and Release dated as of October 24, 2003 (the Settlement Agreement) pursuant to which Mirant assumed both of the TPAs and the terms of the TPAs were modified. The Settlement Agreement also provided that Pepco has an allowed, pre-petition general unsecured claim against Mirant Corporation in the amount of $105 million (the Pepco TPA Claim).

     Pepco has also asserted the Pepco TPA Claim against other Mirant entities, which Pepco believes are liable to Pepco under the terms of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement's Assignment and Assumption Agreement (the Assignment Agreement). Under the Assignment Agreement, Pepco believes that each of the Mirant entities assumed and agreed to discharge certain liabilities and obligations of Pepco as defined in the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement. Mirant has filed objections to these claims. Under the original plan of reorganization filed by the Mirant entities with the Bankruptcy Court, certain Mirant entities other than Mirant Corporation would pay significantly higher percentages of the claims of their creditors than would Mirant Corporation. The amount that Pepco will be able to recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate with respect to the Pepco TPA Claim will depend on the amount of assets available for distribution to creditors of the Mirant entities that are found to be liable for the Pepco TPA Claim.

     Power Purchase Agreements

     Under agreements with FirstEnergy Corp., formerly Ohio Edison (FirstEnergy), and Allegheny Energy, Inc., both entered into in 1987, Pepco is obligated to purchase from FirstEnergy 450 megawatts of capacity and energy annually through December 2005 (the FirstEnergy PPA). Under an agreement with Panda, entered into in 1991, Pepco is obligated to purchase from Panda 230 megawatts of capacity and energy annually through 2021 (the Panda PPA). In each case, the purchase price is substantially in excess of current market price. As a part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco entered into a "back-to-back" arrangement with Mirant. Under this arrangement, Mirant is obligated, among other things, to purchase from Pepco the capacity and energy that Pepco is obligated to purchase under the FirstEnergy PPA and the Panda PPA at a price equal to the price Pepco is obligated to pay under the FirstEnergy PPA and the Panda PPA (the PPA-Related Obligations).

     Pepco Pre-Petition Claims

     When Mirant filed its bankruptcy petition on July 14, 2003, Mirant had unpaid obligations to Pepco of approximately $29 million, consisting primarily of payments due to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations (the Mirant Pre-Petition Obligations). The Mirant Pre-Petition Obligations constitute part of the indebtedness for which Mirant is seeking relief in its bankruptcy proceeding. Pepco has filed Proofs of Claim in the Mirant bankruptcy proceeding in the amount of approximately $26 million to recover this indebtedness; however, the amount of Pepco's recovery, if any, is uncertain. The $3 million difference between Mirant's unpaid obligation to Pepco and the $26 million Proofs of Claim primarily represents a TPA settlement adjustment which is included in the $105 million Proofs of Claim filed by Pepco against the

113
_____________________________________________________________________________

Mirant debtors in respect of the Pepco TPA Claim. In view of the uncertainty as to recoverability, Pepco, in the third quarter of 2003, expensed $14.5 million to establish a reserve against the $29 million receivable from Mirant. In January 2004, Pepco paid approximately $2.5 million to Panda in settlement of certain billing disputes under the Panda PPA that related to periods after the sale of Pepco's generation assets to Mirant. Pepco believes that under the terms of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Mirant is obligated to reimburse Pepco for the settlement payment. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2004, Pepco increased the amount of the receivable due from Mirant by approximately $2.5 million and amended its Proofs of Claim to include this amount. Pepco currently estimates that the $14.5 million expensed in the third quarter of 2003 represents the portion of the entire $31.5 million receivable unlikely to be recovered in bankruptcy, and no additional reserve has been established for the $2.5 million increase in the receivable. The amount expensed represents Pepco's estimate of the possible outcome in bankruptcy, although the amount ultimately recovered could be higher or lower.

     Mirant's Attempt to Reject the PPA-Related Obligations

     On August 28, 2003, Mirant filed with the Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking authorization to reject its PPA-Related Obligations. Upon motions filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (the District Court) by Pepco and FERC, in October 2003, the District Court withdrew jurisdiction over the rejection proceedings from the Bankruptcy Court. In December 2003, the District Court denied Mirant's motion to reject the PPA-Related Obligations on jurisdictional grounds. The District Court's decision was appealed by Mirant and The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Mirant Corporation (the Creditors' Committee) to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the Court of Appeals). On August 4, 2004, the Court of Appeals remanded the case to the District Court saying that the District Court has jurisdiction to rule on the merits of Mirant's rejection motion, suggesting that in doing so the court apply a "more rigorous standard" than the business judgment rule usually applied by bankruptcy courts in ruling on rejection motions.

     On December 9, 2004, the District Court issued an order again denying Mirant's motion to reject the PPA-Related Obligations. The District Court found that the PPA-Related Obligations are not severable from the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement and that the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement cannot be rejected in part, as Mirant was seeking to do. On December 16, the Creditors' Committee appealed the District Court's order to the Court of Appeals, and on December 20, 2004, Mirant also appealed the District Court's order. Mirant and the Creditors' Committee each filed its brief on April 4, 2005. Pepco's and FERC's briefs are due May 19, 2005. Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled.

     As more fully discussed below, Mirant had been making regular periodic payments in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations. On December 9, 2004, Mirant filed a notice with the Bankruptcy Court that it was suspending payments to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations. On December 13, 2004, Mirant failed to make a payment of approximately $17.9 million due to Pepco for the period November 1, 2004 to November 30, 2004. On December 23, 2004, Pepco received a payment of approximately $6.8 million from Mirant, which according to Mirant represented the market value of the power for which payment was due on December 13. At that time, Mirant informed Pepco that it intended to continue to pay the market value, but not the above-market portion, of the power purchased under the PPA-Related Obligations. Pepco

114
_____________________________________________________________________________



disagreed with Mirant's assertion that it need only pay the market value and believed that the amount representing the market value calculated by Mirant was insufficient.

     On January 21, 2005, Mirant made a payment of approximately $21.1 million. Pepco disputed Mirant's contention that the amount paid reflected the full amount due Pepco under these agreements for the applicable periods.

     On January 21, 2005, Mirant filed in the Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking to reject certain of its ongoing obligations under the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, including the PPA-Related Obligations (the Second Motion to Reject). On March 1, 2005 (as amended by order dated March 7, 2005), the District Court granted Pepco's motion to withdraw jurisdiction over the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement rejection proceedings from the Bankruptcy Court. In addition, the District Court ordered Mirant to pay on March 18, 2005, all past-due unpaid amounts under the PPA-Related Obligations. On March 4, 2004, Mirant filed an emergency motion for reconsideration and a stay of the March 1, 2005 order. On March 14, 2005, Pepco filed a response to Mirant's motion.

     On March 16, 2005, the District Court denied Mirant's emergency motion for reconsideration and stay of the District Court's March 1 and March 7 Orders. On the same day, Mirant filed a petition for writ of mandamus, and a motion for stay pending appeal and mandamus review in the Court of Appeals.

     On March 17, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued an Order staying the District Court's Orders of March 1 and March 7, 2005. Accordingly, Mirant was not required to make the payment that was due to Pepco on March 18, 2005 pursuant to the District Court's Orders. On March 28, 2005, in accordance with the Court of Appeals March 17 Order, Pepco, FERC, the Maryland Public Service Commission (MPSC) and Office of the People's Counsel (OPC) of Maryland filed oppositions to Mirant's petition for writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeals. Mirant and the Creditor's Committee filed briefs with the Court of Appeals on April 1, 2005.

     On March 28, 2005, Pepco, FERC, the District of Columbia OPC, the MPSC and the Maryland OPC filed oppositions to the Second Motion to Reject in the District Court.

     On April 11, 2005 the Court of Appeals entered an Order vacating the stay it had ordered on March 17, 2005 and denying Mirant's motions for writ of mandamus and stay pending appeal. On April 13, 2005, Pepco received a payment from Mirant in the amount of approximately $57.5 million, representing the full amount then due in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations.

     Pepco is exercising all available legal remedies and vigorously opposing Mirant's attempt to reject the PPA-Related Obligations and other obligations under the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement in order to protect the interests of its customers and shareholders. While Pepco believes that it has substantial legal bases to oppose the attempt to reject the agreements, the outcome of Mirant's efforts to reject the PPA-Related Obligations is uncertain.

     If Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations, Pepco could be required to repay to Mirant, for the period beginning on the effective date of the rejection (which date could be prior to the date of the court's order granting the rejection and possibly as early as September 18, 2003) and ending on the date Mirant is entitled to cease its purchases of energy and capacity from Pepco, all amounts paid by Mirant to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations, less an amount equal to the price at which Mirant resold the purchased energy and

115
_____________________________________________________________________________

capacity. Pepco estimates that the amount it could be required to repay to Mirant in the unlikely event that September 18, 2003, is determined to be the effective date of rejection, is approximately $185.6 million as of May 1, 2005.

     Mirant has also indicated to the Bankruptcy Court that it will move to require Pepco to disgorge all amounts paid by Mirant to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations, less an amount equal to the price at which Mirant resold the purchased energy and capacity, for the period July 14, 2003 (the date on which Mirant filed its bankruptcy petition) through rejection, if approved, on the theory that Mirant did not receive value for those payments. Pepco estimates that the amount it would be required to repay to Mirant on the disgorgement theory, in addition to the amounts described above, is approximately $22.5 million.

     Any repayment by Pepco of amounts paid by Mirant would entitle Pepco to file a claim against the bankruptcy estate in an amount equal to the amount repaid. Pepco believes that, to the extent such amounts were not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, they would be recoverable as stranded costs from customers through distribution rates as described below.

     The following are estimates prepared by Pepco of its potential future exposure if Mirant's attempt to reject the PPA-Related Obligations ultimately is successful. These estimates are based in part on current market prices and forward price estimates for energy and capacity, and do not include financing costs, all of which could be subject to significant fluctuation. The estimates assume no recovery from the Mirant bankruptcy estate and no regulatory recovery, either of which would mitigate the effect of the estimated loss. Pepco does not consider it realistic to assume that there will be no such recoveries. Based on these assumptions, Pepco estimates that its pre-tax exposure as of May 1, 2005, representing the loss of the future benefit of the PPA-Related Obligations to Pepco, is as follows:

·

If Pepco were required to purchase capacity and energy from FirstEnergy commencing as of May 1, 2005, at the rates provided in the PPA (with an average price per kilowatt hour of approximately 5.9 cents) and resold the capacity and energy at market rates projected, given the characteristics of the FirstEnergy PPA, to be approximately 5.7 cents per kilowatt hour, Pepco estimates that it would cost approximately $6.4 million for the remainder of 2005, the final year of the FirstEnergy PPA.

·

If Pepco were required to purchase capacity and energy from Panda commencing as of May 1, 2005, at the rates provided in the PPA (with an average price per kilowatt hour of approximately 16.8 cents), and resold the capacity and energy at market rates projected, given the characteristics of the Panda PPA, to be approximately 9.0 cents per kilowatt hour, Pepco estimates that it would cost approximately $19 million for the remainder of 2005, approximately $29 million in 2006, approximately $30 million in 2007, and approximately $30 million to $44 million annually thereafter through the 2021 contract termination date.

     The ability of Pepco to recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate in respect to the Mirant Pre-Petition Obligations and damages if the PPA-Related Obligations are successfully rejected will depend on whether Pepco's claims are allowed, the amount of assets available for distribution to the creditors of the Mirant companies determined to be liable for those claims, and Pepco's priority relative to other creditors. At the current stage of the bankruptcy proceeding, there is insufficient information to determine the amount, if any, that Pepco might be able to

116
_____________________________________________________________________________

recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, whether the recovery would be in cash or another form of payment, or the timing of any recovery.

     If Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations and Pepco's full claim is not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, Pepco may seek authority from the MPSC and the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) to recover its additional costs. Pepco is committed to working with its regulatory authorities to achieve a result that is appropriate for its shareholders and customers. Under the provisions of the settlement agreements approved by the MPSC and the DCPSC in the deregulation proceedings in which Pepco agreed to divest its generation assets under certain conditions, the PPAs were to become assets of Pepco's distribution business if they could not be sold. Pepco believes that, if Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations, these provisions would allow the stranded costs of the PPAs that are not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate to be recovered from Pepco's customers through its distribution rates. If Pepco's interpretation of the settlement agreements is confirmed, Pepco expects to be able to establish the amount of its anticipated recovery as a regulatory asset. However, there is no assurance that Pepco's interpretation of the settlement agreements would be confirmed by the respective public service commissions.

     If the PPA-Related Obligations are successfully rejected, and there is no regulatory recovery, Pepco will incur a loss. However, the accounting treatment of such a loss depends on a number of legal and regulatory factors, and is not determinable at this time.

     The SMECO Agreement

     As a term of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco assigned to Mirant a facility and capacity agreement with Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. (SMECO) under which Pepco was obligated to purchase the capacity of an 84-megawatt combustion turbine installed and owned by SMECO at a former Pepco generating facility (the SMECO Agreement). The SMECO Agreement expires in 2015 and contemplates a monthly payment to SMECO of approximately $.5 million. Pepco is responsible to SMECO for the performance of the SMECO Agreement if Mirant fails to perform its obligations thereunder. At this time, Mirant continues to make post-petition payments due to SMECO.

     On March 15, 2004, Mirant filed a complaint with the Bankruptcy Court seeking a declaratory judgment that the SMECO Agreement is an unexpired lease of non-residential real property rather than an executory contract and that if Mirant were to successfully reject the agreement, any claim against the bankruptcy estate for damages made by SMECO (or by Pepco as subrogee) would be subject to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code that limit the recovery of rejection damages by lessors. Pepco believes that there is no reasonable factual or legal basis to support Mirant's contention that the SMECO Agreement is a lease of real property. Litigation continues and the outcome of this proceeding cannot be predicted.

      Mirant Plan of Reorganization

     On January 19, 2005, Mirant filed its Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement with the Bankruptcy Court. In that plan, Mirant proposed to transfer all assets to "New Mirant" (an entity it proposed to create in the reorganization), with the exception of the PPA-Related Obligations. Mirant proposed that the PPA-Related Obligations would remain in "Old Mirant,"

117
_____________________________________________________________________________

which would be a shell entity as a result of the reorganization. Pepco believes this plan cannot be confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court under the law and has submitted objections to the plan. The plan also did not have the support of any of the creditor's committees in the Mirant bankruptcy.

     On March 11, 2005, Mirant filed an application with FERC seeking approval for the internal transfers and corporate restructuring that will result from its proposed Plan of Reorganization. Mirant must obtain FERC approval for these transactions under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act. On April 1, 2005, Pepco filed a motion to intervene and protest at FERC in connection with Mirant's March 11 FERC filing. On the same date, the District of Columbia OPC also filed a motion to intervene and protest.

    On March 25, 2005, Mirant filed its First Amended Plan of Reorganization and First Amended Disclosure Statement. Pepco is currently analyzing this amended plan.

Rate Proceedings

     New Jersey

     For a discussion of the history of ACE's proceeding filed with the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) to increase its electric distribution rates and Regulatory Asset Recovery Charge (RARC) in New Jersey (also referred to as Phase I) and a related Phase II proceeding, please refer to Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Regulatory and Other Matters -- Rate Proceedings" of PHI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K). On April 19, 2005, a settlement was reached among ACE, the staff of the NJBPU, the New Jersey Ratepayer Advocate and active intervenor parties. The settlement, if approved by the NJBPU, will resolve issues in both the Phase I proceeding and the other issues referred by the NJBPU to the base rate proceeding and addressed in the Phase II proceeding. No party to either of these proceedings opposes the settlement.

    The proposed settlement will allow for an increase in ACE's base rates of approximately $18.8 million, $2.8 million of which would come from an increase in RARC revenue collections. $16 million of the base rate increase, not related to RARC collections, will be collected annually until such time as base rates change pursuant to another base rate proceeding. The $2.8 million in RARC collections will be collected each year for four years. The $18.8 million increase in base rate revenue will be offset by a base rate revenue decrease in a similar amount in total resulting from a change in depreciation rate, which is further discussed below, similar to what has been adopted by the NJBPU for other New Jersey electric utility companies. Overall, the settlement provides for a net decrease in revenues of approximately $.3 million, consisting of a $3.1 million reduction of distribution revenues offset by the $2.8 million increase in RARC revenue collections mentioned above. The proposed settlement specifies an overall rate of return of 8.14%. The proposed settlement provides for a change in depreciation rates driven by a change in average service lives. In addition, the settlement provides for a change in depreciation technique from remaining life to whole life, including amortization of any calculated excess or deficiencies in the depreciation reserve. As a result of these changes there is a net excess depreciation reserve. Accordingly PHI and ACE recorded a regulatory liability in March 2005 by reducing its depreciation reserve by approximately $131 million. The regulatory liability will be amortized over 8.25 years and will result in a reduction of depreciation and amortization expense on PHI's and

118
_____________________________________________________________________________

ACE's consolidated statements of earnings. While the impact of the settlement will be essentially revenue and cash neutral to PHI and ACE, there will be a positive annual pre-tax earnings impact to PHI and ACE of approximately $20 million.

     With respect to Phase II issues, which included supply-related deferred costs, the settlement provides for a disallowance of $13.0 million previously recorded to such deferred accounts and specifies the recovery over four years of an adjusted deferred balance of approximately $116.8 million, including a portion of the $25.4 million of costs transferred first into the Phase I proceeding from other proceedings and then ultimately into the Phase II proceeding, offset by the return over one year of over-collected balances in certain other deferred accounts, with the net result being that there will be no rate impact from the deferral account recoveries and credits for at least one year.

     The settlement does not become effective unless approved by the NJBPU. It is likely that the NJBPU will consider the settlement in the second quarter of 2005. While ACE believes it is probable that the NJBPU will approve the settlement, ACE cannot predict with certainty the timing of any NJBPU approval. The settlement does not affect the existing appeal filed by ACE with the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey related to the July 2004 Final Decision and Order issued by the NJBPU in ACE's restructuring deferral proceeding before the NJBPU under the New Jersey Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act. For additional information about this appeal and the New Jersey regulatory proceeding leading up to this appeal, please refer to Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Regulatory and Other Matters -- Restructuring Deferral" of the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K.

     Delaware

     For a discussion of the history DPL's annual Gas Cost Rate (GCR) filing, please refer to Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Regulatory and Other Matters -- Rate Proceedings" of the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K. An evidentiary hearing was held on May 5, 2005, at which both Delaware Public Service Commission (DPSC) staff and the Division of Public Advocate testified that the rates sought by DPL should be approved as filed. A final order addressing both the November 1 and December 29 increases is expected in the second quarter of 2005.

     Pursuant to the April 16, 2002 merger settlement agreement in Delaware, on May 4, 2005, DPL made a filing with the DPSC whereby DPL seeks approval of a proposed increase of approximately $6.177 million in electric transmission service revenues, or about 1.1% of total Delaware retail electric revenues. This proposed revenue increase is the Delaware retail portion of the increase in the "Delmarva zonal" transmission rates on file with FERC under the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT). This level of revenue increase will decrease to the extent that competitive retail suppliers provide a supply and transmission service to retail customers. In that circumstance, PJM would charge the competitive retail supplier the PJM OATT rate for transmission service into the Delmarva zone and DPL's charges to the retail customer would exclude as a "shopping credit" an amount equal to the standard offer service supply charge and the transmission and ancillary charges that would otherwise be charged by
DPL to the retail customer. DPL has proposed to begin collecting this rate change for service rendered on and after June 3, 2005, subject to refund.

119
_____________________________________________________________________________

     District of Columbia

     For a discussion of the history of Pepco's distribution rate review case filed with the DCPSC, please refer to Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Regulatory and Other Matters -- Rate Proceedings" of the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K. On April 7, 2005, the DCPSC approved a settlement of this proceeding, which provides that Pepco's current distribution rates will remain unchanged through the end of the rate cap periods set forth above, except as otherwise provided in the merger settlement, or as may otherwise be required by the Commission or by law.

SOS and Default Service Proceedings

      Virginia

     For a discussion of the history of DPL's default service proceedings in Virginia, please refer to Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Regulatory and Other Matters -- SOS and Default Service Proceedings" of the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K. As discussed in the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K, the parties to this proceeding entered into and filed, on March 4, 2005, a settlement resolving the issues in this proceeding. The settlement proposed to make the interim rates DPL had put into effect final, without any administrative charge or margin, but with the amount of the final rates being contingent only on possible future adjustment depending on the result of a related proceeding at FERC. The VSCC approved the settlement on March 25, 2005.

     Delaware

     For a discussion of the history of DPL's default service proceedings Delaware, please refer to Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Regulatory and Other Matters -- SOS and Default Service Proceedings" of the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K. On March 22, 2005, the DPSC issued an order approving DPL as the SOS provider at market rates after May 1, 2006, when DPL's current fixed rate POLR obligation ends. The DPSC will determine in the future the duration of DPL's market rate SOS obligation and the margin, if any, that it will be permitted to earn in conjunction with providing the SOS. The DPSC also approved a structure whereby DPL will purchase the power supply required to satisfy its market rate SOS obligations from wholesale suppliers under contracts entered into pursuant to a competitive bid procedure.

Proposed Shut Down of B.L. England Generating Facility; Construction of Transmission Facilities

    For a discussion of the history of the proposed shut-down of the B.L. England generating facility, please refer to Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Regulatory and Other Matters -- Proposed Shut Down of B.L. England Generating Facility; Construction of Transmission Facilities " of the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K. As discussed in the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K, in November 2004, ACE made a filing with the NJBPU requesting the necessary approvals for construction of the transmission upgrades required to maintain reliability in the Atlantic zone after the retirement of B.L. England. The NJBPU issued an order on April 21, 2005, which unanimously approved the petition for the construction of the transmission upgrades, including the 230 kilovolt (kV) Cumberland to Dennis line, the138 kV Dennis to Corson line, and the 138 kV Cardiff to Lewis

120
_____________________________________________________________________________

line. The approval states that these lines are necessary even if B.L. England does not shut down. On May 6, 2005, ACE announced that it would again auction its electric generation assets, including B.L. England. ACE intends to construct the transmission upgrades referred to above whether or not B.L. England is sold.

Environmental Litigation

     For a discussion of the history of DPL's Administrative Consent Order, entered into with the Maryland Department of the Environment, to perform a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) with respect to former manufactured gas plant operations at the Cambridge, Maryland site, please refer to Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Regulatory and Other Matters -- Environmental Litigation" of the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K. Due to project delays, DPL now expects that the completion date for the RI/FS will be in the fourth quarter of 2005.

Preliminary Settlement Agreement with the NJDEP

     For a discussion of the history and details of the April 26, 2004 preliminary settlement agreement entered into by PHI, Conectiv, ACE, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) and the Attorney General of New Jersey, please refer to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Regulatory and Other Matters -- Preliminary Settlement Agreement with the NJDEP" of the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K.. As discussed in the Pepco Holdings 2004 10-K, under the preliminary settlement agreement, in order to address ACE's appeal of NJDEP actions relating to NJDEP's July 2001 denial of ACE's request to renew a permit variance from sulfur-in-fuel requirements under New Jersey regulations, effective through July 30, 2001, that authorized Unit 1 at B.L. England generating facility to burn bituminous coal containing greater than 1% sulfur, ACE will be permitted to combust coal with a sulfur content of greater than 1% at the B.L. England facility in accordance with the terms of B.L. England's current permit until December 15, 2007 and NJDEP will not impose new, more stringent short-term SO 2 emissions limits on the B.L. England facility during this period. However, in the absence of a final settlement agreement with NJDEP, ACE will need to seek, in July 2005, a renewal of its current fuel authorization, which is scheduled to expire on July 30, 2006. The preliminary settlement agreement provides that the parties will work toward a consent order or other final settlement document that reflects the terms of the preliminary settlement agreement. ACE, Conectiv and PHI continue to negotiate with the NJDEP the terms of a consent order or other final settlement document.

Federal Tax Treatment of cross-border Leases

     PCI maintains a portfolio of cross-border energy sale-leaseback transactions, which as of March 31, 2005 had a book value of approximately $1.2 billion and from which PHI currently derives approximately $55 million per year in tax benefits in the form of interest and depreciation deductions. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 imposed new passive loss limitation rules that apply prospectively to leases (including cross-border leases) entered into after March 12, 2004 with tax indifferent parties ( i.e ., municipalities and tax exempt or governmental entities). All of PCI's cross-border energy leases are with tax indifferent parties and were entered into prior to 2004. Although this legislation is prospective in nature and does not affect PCI's existing cross-border energy leases, it does not prohibit the IRS from challenging prior leasing transactions. In this regard, on February 11, 2005, the Treasury

121
_____________________________________________________________________________

Department and IRS issued Notice 2005-13 informing taxpayers that the IRS intends to challenge on various grounds the purported tax benefits claimed by taxpayers entering into certain sale-leaseback transactions with tax-indifferent parties, including those entered into on or prior to March 12, 2004 (the Notice). PCI's cross-border energy leases are similar to those sale-leaseback transactions described in the Notice.

     PCI's leases have been under examination by the IRS as part of the normal PHI tax audit. On May 4, 2005, the IRS issued a Notice of Proposed Adjustment to PHI that challenges the tax benefits realized from interest and depreciation deductions claimed by PHI with respect to these leases for the tax years 2001 and 2002. The tax benefits claimed by PHI with respect to these leases from 2001 through the first quarter of 2005 were approximately $189 million. The ultimate outcome of this issue is uncertain; however, if the IRS prevails, PHI would be subject to additional taxes, along with interest and possibly penalties on the additional taxes, which could have a material adverse effect on PHI's results of operations and cash flow.

    PHI believes that its tax position related to these transactions was proper based on applicable statutes, regulations and case law, and intends to contest any adjustments proposed by the IRS; however, there is no assurance that PHI's position will prevail.

     Under SFAS No. 13, as currently interpreted, a settlement with the IRS that results in a deferral of tax benefits that does not change the total estimated net income from a lease does not require an adjustment to the book value of the lease. However, if the IRS were to disallow, rather than require the deferral of, certain tax deductions related to PHI's leases, PHI would be required to adjust the book value of the leases and record a charge to earnings equal to the repricing impact of the disallowed deductions. Such a charge to earnings, if required, is likely to have a material adverse effect on PHI's results of operations for the period in which the charge is recorded.

     In recent deliberations, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has determined that a change in the timing of tax benefits also should require a repricing of the lease and an adjustment to the book value of a lease. Under this interpretation, a material change in the timing of cash flows under PHI's cross-border leases as the result of a settlement with the IRS also would require an adjustment to the book value. PHI understands that the FASB intends to publish this guidance for comment in the near future to become effective at the end of 2005. If adopted, the application of this guidance could result in a material adverse effect on PHI's results of operations even if the resolution is limited to a deferral of the tax benefits realized by PCI from its leases.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     No material changes to Pepco Holdings' critical accounting policies occurred during the first quarter of 2005. Accordingly, for a discussion of these policies, please refer to Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Pepco Holdings' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

122
_____________________________________________________________________________

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

SAB 107 and SFAS 123R

     In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) which provides implementation guidance on the interaction between FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) and certain SEC rules and regulations as well as guidance on the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies.

     In April 2005, the SEC approved a new rule delaying the effective date of SFAS 123R for public companies. Under the SEC's rule, SFAS 123R is now effective for public companies for annual, rather than interim, periods that begin after June 15, 2005 (year ended December 31, 2006 for Pepco Holdings). Pepco Holdings is in the process of completing its evaluation of the impact of SFAS 123R and does not anticipate that its implementation or SAB 107 will have a material effect on PHI's overall financial position or net results of operations.

FIN 47

     In March 2005, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) published FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations applies to conditional asset retirement obligations as defined and requires that the fair value of a reasonably estimable conditional asset retirement obligation be recognized as part of the carrying amounts of the asset. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005 (December 31, 2005 for Pepco Holdings).  Pepco Holdings is in the process of evaluating the anticipated impact that the implementation of FIN 47 will have on its overall financial position or net results of operations.

RISK FACTORS

     The IRS challenge to cross-border energy sale and lease-back transactions entered into by a PHI subsidiary could result in loss of prior and future tax benefits.

     PCI maintains a portfolio of cross-border energy sale-leaseback transactions, which as of March 31, 2005 had a book value of approximately $1.2 billion and from which PHI currently derives approximately $55 million per year in tax benefits in the form of interest and depreciation deductions. All of PCI's cross-border energy leases are with tax indifferent parties and were entered into prior to 2004. On February 11, 2005, the Treasury Department and IRS issued a notice informing taxpayers that the IRS intends to challenge the tax benefits claimed by taxpayers with respect to certain of these transactions.

     PCI's leases have been under examination by the IRS as part of the normal PHI tax audit. On May 4, 2005, the IRS issued a Notice of Proposed Adjustment to PHI that challenges the tax benefits realized from interest and depreciation deductions claimed by PHI with respect to these leases for the tax years 2001 and 2002. The tax benefits claimed by PHI with respect to these leases from 2001 through the first quarter of 2005 were approximately $189 million. The ultimate outcome of this issue is uncertain; however, if the IRS prevails, PHI would be subject to

123
_____________________________________________________________________________



additional taxes, along with interest and possibly penalties on the additional taxes, which could have a material adverse effect on PHI's results of operations and cash flow.

     In addition, a disallowance, rather than a deferral, of tax benefits to be realized by PHI from these leases will require PHI to adjust the book value of its leases and record a charge to earnings equal to the repricing impact of the disallowed deductions. Such a change would likely have a material adverse effect on PHI's results of operations for the period in which the charge is recorded. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Regulatory and Other Matters."

     For information concerning additional risk factors, please refer to Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Pepco Holdings' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

     Some of the statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include declarations regarding Pepco Holdings' intents, beliefs and current expectations. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential" or "continue" or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. Any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results could differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve estimates, assumptions, known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

     The forward-looking statements contained herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the following important factors, which are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties, are beyond Pepco Holdings' control and may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements:

·

Prevailing governmental policies and regulatory actions affecting the energy industry, including with respect to allowed rates of return, industry and rate structure, acquisition and disposal of assets and facilities, operation and construction of plant facilities, recovery of purchased power expenses, and present or prospective wholesale and retail competition;

·

Changes in and compliance with environmental and safety laws and policies;

·

Weather conditions;

·

Population growth rates and demographic patterns;

·

Competition for retail and wholesale customers;

124
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

·

General economic conditions, including potential negative impacts resulting from an economic downturn;

·

Growth in demand, sales and capacity to fulfill demand;

·

Changes in tax rates or policies or in rates of inflation;

·

Changes in project costs;

·

Unanticipated changes in operating expenses and capital expenditures;

·

The ability to obtain funding in the capital markets on favorable terms;

·

Restrictions imposed by PUHCA;

·

Legal and administrative proceedings (whether civil or criminal) and settlements that influence our business and profitability;

·

Pace of entry into new markets;

·

Volatility in market demand and prices for energy, capacity and fuel;

·

Interest rate fluctuations and credit market concerns; and

·

Effects of geopolitical events, including the threat of domestic terrorism.

     Any forward-looking statements speak only as to the date of this Quarterly Report and Pepco Holdings undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for Pepco Holdings to predict all of such factors, nor can Pepco Holdings assess the impact of any such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

     Pepco Holdings undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The foregoing review of factors should not be construed as exhaustive.

 

 

125
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 

 

 

126
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
   AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY

GENERAL OVERVIEW

     Potomac Electric Power Company (Pepco) is engaged in the transmission and distribution of electricity in Washington, D.C. and major portions of Montgomery County and Prince George's County in suburban Maryland. Pepco's service territory covers approximately 640 square miles and has a population of approximately 2 million. As of March 31, 2005, approximately 57% of delivered electricity sales were to Maryland customers and approximately 43% were to Washington, D.C. customers.

     Pepco is a wholly owned subsidiary of PHI. Because PHI is a public utility holding company registered under PUHCA, the relationship between PHI and Pepco and certain activities of Pepco are subject to the regulatory oversight of the SEC under PUHCA.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     The accompanying results of operations discussion is for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004. All amounts in the tables (except sales and customers) are in millions.

Operating Revenue

 

2005

2004

Change

 

Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

$

202.0

 

$

191.1

 

$

10.9

   

Default Supply Revenue

 

214.5

   

169.1

   

45.4

   

Other Electric Revenue

 

9.0

   

9.4

   

(.4

)

 

     Total Operating Revenue

$

425.5

$

369.6

$

55.9

     The table above shows the amount of Operating Revenue earned that is subject to price regulation (Regulated T&D (Transmission and Distribution) Electric Revenue and Default Supply Revenue) and that which is not subject to price regulation (Other Electric Revenue). Regulated T&D Electric Revenue consists of the revenue Pepco receives for delivery of electricity to its customers for which service Pepco is paid regulated rates. Default Supply Revenue is the revenue received from Default Electricity Supply. The costs related to the supply of electricity are included in Fuel and Purchased Energy. Other Electric Revenue includes work and services performed on behalf of customers including other utilities, which is not subject to price regulation. Work and services includes mutual assistance to other utilities, highway relocation, rents, late payments, and collection fees.

127
_____________________________________________________________________________

      Regulated T&D Electric

Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

$

55.7

 

$

56.8

 

$

(1.1

)

 

Commercial

 

118.0

   

105.5

   

12.5

   

Industrial

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

Other (Includes PJM)

 

28.3

   

28.8

   

(.5

)

 

     Total Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

$

202.0

$

191.1

$

10.9

Regulated T&D Electric Sales (GwH)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

2,085

   

2,215

   

(130

)

 

Commercial

 

4,588

   

4,419

   

169

   

Industrial

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

Other

 

45

   

46

   

(1

)

 

     Total Regulated T&D Electric Sales

 

6,718

   

6,680

   

38

   

Regulated T&D Electric Customers (000s)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

668

   

660

   

8

   

Commercial

 

72

   

72

   

-

   

Industrial

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

Other

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

     Total Regulated T&D Electric Customers

740

732

8

     Regulated T&D Electric Revenue increased by $10.9 million primarily due to the following: (i) $8.0 million increase in tax pass-throughs, primarily a county surcharge (offset in Other Taxes) (ii) $4.3 million increase due to growth and customer sales mix, partially offset by (iii) $1.0 million decrease due to unfavorable weather. Delivery sales were approximately 6,718,000 MwH, compared to approximately 6,680,000 MwH for the comparable period in 2004. Heating degree days decreased by 2.7% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.

      Default Electricity Supply

Default Supply Revenue

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

$

106.5

 

$

73.6

 

$

32.9

   

Commercial

 

106.4

   

94.5

   

11.9

   

Industrial

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

Other (Includes PJM)

 

1.6

   

1.0

   

.6

   

     Total Default Supply Revenue

$

214.5

$

169.1

$

45.4

128
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

Default Electricity Supply Sales (GwH)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

1,897

1,943

(46

)

Commercial

 

2,140

   

2,735

   

(595

)

 

Industrial

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

Other

 

28

   

37

   

(9

)

 

     Total Default Electricity Supply Sales

 

4,065

   

4,715

   

(650

)

 

Default Electricity Supply Customers (000s)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

617

   

585

   

32

   

Commercial

 

58

   

59

   

(1

)

 

Industrial

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

Other

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

     Total Default Electricity Supply Customers

675

644

31

     Default Supply Revenue increased by $45.4 million, despite a decline in sales driven by customer migration, primarily due to higher retail energy rates, the result of the successful implementation of the SOS competitive bid procedure in Maryland beginning in July 2004 and in the District of Columbia beginning in February 2005 (offset in Fuel and Purchased Energy).

     For the three months ended March 31, 2005, Pepco's Maryland customers served by an alternate supplier represented 34% of Pepco's total Maryland load, and Pepco's District of Columbia customers served by an alternate supplier represented 49% of Pepco's total District of Columbia load. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, Pepco's Maryland customers served by an alternate supplier represented 24% of Pepco's total Maryland load, and Pepco's District of Columbia customers served by an alternate supplier represented 37% of Pepco's total District of Columbia load.

     Default Electricity Supply Sales were approximately 4,065,000 MwH for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to approximately 4,715,000 MwH for the comparable period in 2004.

Operating Expenses

      Fuel and Purchased Energy

     Fuel and Purchased Energy increased by $42.7 million to $216.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, from $173.7 million for the comparable period in 2004. The increase was primarily due to the following: (i) $40.6 million increase in energy costs, which are reflected in the new SOS rates for Maryland beginning in July 2004 and the District of Columbia beginning in February 2005 (offset in Default Supply Revenue), (ii) $4.4 million increase in costs due to the end of the generation procurement credit (GPC) as a result of the new SOS agreements, partially offset by (iii) $2.3 million lower PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM) network transmission costs.

129
_____________________________________________________________________________

      Other Operation and Maintenance

      Other Operation and Maintenance decreased by $.6 million to $66.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, from $67.1 million for the comparable period in 2004. The decrease was primarily due to (i) $2.5 million lower Default Supply costs, (ii) $2.1 million lower severance costs, (iii) $1.8 million lower information technology costs, and (iv) $.8 million lower employee benefit expense, partially offset by (v) $2.0 million higher incentive costs, (vi) $2.2 million higher building lease costs, (vii) $1.5 million sick pay reserve, and (viii) $1.3 million increased bad debt expense.

      Depreciation and Amortization

     Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased by $4.1 million to $39.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from $43.9 million for the comparable period in 2004. The decrease is primarily due to a $2.7 million decrease related to non-regulated assets and $1.8 million decrease due to software retirements.

      Other Taxes

      Other Taxes increased by $9.2 million to $65.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, from $56.5 million for the comparable period in 2004. The increase was primarily due to pass-throughs of (i) $6.9 million higher county surcharge and $1.3 million higher delivery taxes (offset in Regulated T&D Electric Revenue) and (ii) $1.0 million delivery tax prior period adjustment.

      Gain on Sale of Assets

     The gain on sale of assets in the first quarter of 2004 of $6.6 million represents the sale of land.

      Other Income (Expenses)

     Other Expenses decreased by $2.8 million to a net expense of $16.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from a net expense of $19.3 million for the comparable period in 2004. This was primarily due to (i) $1.2 million lower interest expense and (ii) $1.1 million higher other income.

Income Tax Expense

     Pepco's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was 44% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit) and the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences partially offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits and certain removal costs.

     Pepco's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was 38% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit, including the benefit associated with the retroactive adjustment for the issuance of final consolidated return regulations by a local taxing authority, which is the primary reason for the lower effective rate as compared to 2005) and the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences partially offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits and certain removal costs.

130
_____________________________________________________________________________

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Financing Activity Subsequent to March 31, 2005

     On May 5, 2005, Pepco Holdings, Pepco, DPL and ACE entered into a five-year credit agreement with an aggregate borrowing limit of $1.2 billion. This agreement replaces a $650 million five-year credit agreement that was entered into in July 2004 and a $550 million three-year credit agreement entered into in July 2003. Pepco Holdings' credit limit under this agreement is $700 million.  The credit limit of each of Pepco, DPL and ACE is the lower of $300 million and the maximum amount of debt the company is permitted to have outstanding by its regulatory authorities, except that the aggregate amount of credit used by Pepco, DPL and ACE at any given time under the agreement may not exceed $500 million in the aggregate. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the companies are entitled to request increases in the principal amount of available credit up to an aggregate increase of $300 million, with any such increase proportionately increasing the credit limit of each of the respective borrowers and the $300 million sublimits for each of Pepco, DPL and ACE.  The interest rate payable by the respective companies on utilized funds will be based on a pricing schedule determined by the credit rating of the borrower. The indebtedness incurred under the Credit Agreement is unsecured.

     The credit agreement is intended to serve primarily as a source of liquidity to support the commercial paper programs of the respective companies. The companies also are permitted to use the facility to borrow funds for general corporate purposes and issue letters of credit. In order for a borrower to use the facility, certain representations and warranties made by the borrower at the time the credit agreement was entered into also must be true at the time the facility is utilized, and the borrower must be in compliance with specified covenants, including the financial covenant described below. However, a material adverse change in the borrower's business, property, or financial condition subsequent to the entry into the credit agreement is not a condition to the availability of credit under the facility. Among the covenants contained in the credit agreement are (i) the requirement that each borrowing company maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization of 65% or less, computed in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, (ii) a restriction on sales or other dispositions of assets, other than sales and dispositions permitted by the credit agreement and (iii) a restriction on the incurrence of liens on the assets of a borrower or any of its significant subsidiaries other than liens permitted by the credit agreement.   The failure to satisfy any of the covenants or the occurrence of specified events that constitute events of default that could result in the acceleration of repayment obligations of the borrower. The events of default include (i) the failure of any borrowing company or any of its significant subsidiaries to pay when due, or the acceleration of, certain indebtedness under other borrowing arrangements, (ii) certain bankruptcy events, judgments or decrees against any borrowing company or its significant subsidiaries, and (iii) a change in control (as defined in the credit agreement) of Pepco Holdings or the failure of Pepco Holdings to own all of the voting stock of Pepco, DPL and ACE. The agreement does not include any ratings triggers.

131
_____________________________________________________________________________

Working Capital

     At March 31, 2005, Pepco's current assets totaled $432.6 million and its current liabilities totaled $504.4 million. At December 31, 2004, Pepco's current assets totaled $364.0 million and its current liabilities totaled $434.6 million.

     Pepco's working capital deficit results in large part from the fact that, in the normal course of business, it acquires and pays for energy supplies for its customers before the supplies are metered and then billed to customers. Short-term financings are used to meet liquidity needs. Short-term financings are also used, at times, to temporarily fund redemptions of long-term debt, until long-term replacement issues are completed.

Cash Flow Activities

     Pepco's cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized below.

 

Cash Source / (Use)

 
   

2005

   

2004

   
   

(Dollars in Millions)

   

Operating activities

$

33.7

 

$

70.5

   

Investing activities

 

(34.0

)

 

(20.4

)

 

Financing activities

 

7.1

   

152.3

   

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

$

6.8

 

$

202.4

   
               

     Operating Activities

     Cash flows from operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized below.

 

Cash Source / (Use)

 
   

2005

   

2004

   
   

(Dollars in Millions)

   

Net income

$

11.5

 

$

9.5

   

Non-cash adjustments to net income

 

34.0

   

29.3

   

Changes in working capital

 

(11.8

)

 

31.7

   

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

33.7

 

$

70.5

   
               

     Net cash flows provided by operating activities decreased by $36.8 million to $33.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from $70.5 million for the comparable period in 2004 mainly due to property and right-of-way tax payments made in the 2005 quarter.

     Investing Activities

     Cash flows from investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized below.

132
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Cash Source / (Use)

 
   

2005

   

2004

   
   

(Dollars in Millions)

   

Construction expenditures

$

(35.4

)

$

(42.4

)

 

Cash proceeds from asset sales

 

-

   

22.0

   

All other investing cash flows, net

 

1.4

   

-

   

Net cash used by investing activities

$

(34.0

)

$

(20.4

)

 
               

     Net cash used by investing activities increased by $13.6 million to $34.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from $20.4 million for the comparable period in 2004. The increase was primarily due to the receipt of proceeds from the sale of land in the first quarter of 2004, partially offset by a decrease in construction expenditures in the first quarter of 2005.

     Financing Activities

     Cash flows from financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized below.

 

Cash Source / (Use)

 
   

2005

   

2004

   
   

(Dollars in Millions)

   

Dividends on common and preferred stock

$

(15.2

)

$

(12.2

)

 

Long term debt, net

 

-

   

275.0

   

Short term debt, net

 

22.4

   

(107.6

)

 

All other financing cash flows, net

 

(.1

)

 

(2.9

)

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

$

7.1

 

$

152.3

   
               

     In the first quarter of 2004 Pepco issued $275 million of secured senior notes with maturities of 10 and 30 years; the proceeds of which were used to redeem higher interest rate securities and to repay short-term debt.

Capital Requirements

     Construction Expenditures

     Pepco's construction expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2005 totaled $35.4 million. These expenditures were related to capital costs associated with new customer services, distribution reliability, and transmission.

REGULATORY AND OTHER MATTERS

Relationship with Mirant Corporation

     In 2000, Pepco sold substantially all of its electricity generation assets to Mirant Corporation, formerly Southern Energy, Inc. As part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco entered into several ongoing contractual arrangements with Mirant and certain of its subsidiaries

133
_____________________________________________________________________________

(collectively, Mirant). On July 14, 2003, Mirant Corporation and most of its subsidiaries filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (the Bankruptcy Court).

     Depending on the outcome of the matters discussed below, the Mirant bankruptcy could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of Pepco Holdings and Pepco. However, management believes that Pepco Holdings and Pepco currently have sufficient cash, cash flow and borrowing capacity under their credit facilities and in the capital markets to be able to satisfy any additional cash requirements that may arise due to the Mirant bankruptcy. Accordingly, management does not anticipate that the Mirant bankruptcy will impair the ability of Pepco Holdings or Pepco to fulfill their contractual obligations or to fund projected capital expenditures. On this basis, management currently does not believe that the Mirant bankruptcy will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of either company.

     Transition Power Agreements

     As part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco and Mirant entered into Transition Power Agreements for Maryland and the District of Columbia, respectively (collectively, the TPAs). Under these agreements, Mirant was obligated to supply Pepco with all of the capacity and energy needed to fulfill its SOS obligations in Maryland through June 2004 and its SOS obligations in the District of Columbia through January 22, 2005.

     To avoid the potential rejection of the TPAs, Pepco and Mirant entered into an Amended Settlement Agreement and Release dated as of October 24, 2003 (the Settlement Agreement) pursuant to which Mirant assumed both of the TPAs and the terms of the TPAs were modified. The Settlement Agreement also provided that Pepco has an allowed, pre-petition general unsecured claim against Mirant Corporation in the amount of $105 million (the Pepco TPA Claim).

     Pepco has also asserted the Pepco TPA Claim against other Mirant entities, which Pepco believes are liable to Pepco under the terms of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement's Assignment and Assumption Agreement (the Assignment Agreement). Under the Assignment Agreement, Pepco believes that each of the Mirant entities assumed and agreed to discharge certain liabilities and obligations of Pepco as defined in the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement. Mirant has filed objections to these claims. Under the original plan of reorganization filed by the Mirant entities with the Bankruptcy Court, certain Mirant entities other than Mirant Corporation would pay significantly higher percentages of the claims of their creditors than would Mirant Corporation. The amount that Pepco will be able to recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate with respect to the Pepco TPA Claim will depend on the amount of assets available for distribution to creditors of the Mirant entities that are found to be liable for the Pepco TPA Claim.

     Power Purchase Agreements

     Under agreements with FirstEnergy Corp., formerly Ohio Edison (FirstEnergy), and Allegheny Energy, Inc., both entered into in 1987, Pepco is obligated to purchase from FirstEnergy 450 megawatts of capacity and energy annually through December 2005 (the FirstEnergy PPA). Under an agreement with Panda, entered into in 1991, Pepco is obligated to purchase from Panda 230 megawatts of capacity and energy annually through 2021 (the Panda PPA). In each case, the purchase price is substantially in excess of current market price. As a part of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco entered into a "back-to-

134
_____________________________________________________________________________

back" arrangement with Mirant. Under this arrangement, Mirant is obligated, among other things, to purchase from Pepco the capacity and energy that Pepco is obligated to purchase under the FirstEnergy PPA and the Panda PPA at a price equal to the price Pepco is obligated to pay under the FirstEnergy PPA and the Panda PPA (the PPA-Related Obligations).

     Pepco Pre-Petition Claims

     When Mirant filed its bankruptcy petition on July 14, 2003, Mirant had unpaid obligations to Pepco of approximately $29 million, consisting primarily of payments due to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations (the Mirant Pre-Petition Obligations). The Mirant Pre-Petition Obligations constitute part of the indebtedness for which Mirant is seeking relief in its bankruptcy proceeding. Pepco has filed Proofs of Claim in the Mirant bankruptcy proceeding in the amount of approximately $26 million to recover this indebtedness; however, the amount of Pepco's recovery, if any, is uncertain. The $3 million difference between Mirant's unpaid obligation to Pepco and the $26 million Proofs of Claim primarily represents a TPA settlement adjustment which is included in the $105 million Proofs of Claim filed by Pepco against the Mirant debtors in respect of the Pepco TPA Claim. In view of the uncertainty as to recoverability, Pepco, in the third quarter of 2003, expensed $14.5 million to establish a reserve against the $29 million receivable from Mirant. In January 2004, Pepco paid approximately $2.5 million to Panda in settlement of certain billing disputes under the Panda PPA that related to periods after the sale of Pepco's generation assets to Mirant. Pepco believes that under the terms of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Mirant is obligated to reimburse Pepco for the settlement payment. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2004, Pepco increased the amount of the receivable due from Mirant by approximately $2.5 million and amended its Proofs of Claim to include this amount. Pepco currently estimates that the $14.5 million expensed in the third quarter of 2003 represents the portion of the entire $31.5 million receivable unlikely to be recovered in bankruptcy, and no additional reserve has been established for the $2.5 million increase in the receivable. The amount expensed represents Pepco's estimate of the possible outcome in bankruptcy, although the amount ultimately recovered could be higher or lower.

     Mirant's Attempt to Reject the PPA-Related Obligations

     On August 28, 2003, Mirant filed with the Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking authorization to reject its PPA-Related Obligations. Upon motions filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (the District Court) by Pepco and FERC, in October 2003, the District Court withdrew jurisdiction over the rejection proceedings from the Bankruptcy Court. In December 2003, the District Court denied Mirant's motion to reject the PPA-Related Obligations on jurisdictional grounds. The District Court's decision was appealed by Mirant and The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Mirant Corporation (the Creditors' Committee) to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the Court of Appeals). On August 4, 2004, the Court of Appeals remanded the case to the District Court saying that the District Court has jurisdiction to rule on the merits of Mirant's rejection motion, suggesting that in doing so the court apply a "more rigorous standard" than the business judgment rule usually applied by bankruptcy courts in ruling on rejection motions.

135
_____________________________________________________________________________

     On December 9, 2004, the District Court issued an order again denying Mirant's motion to reject the PPA-Related Obligations. The District Court found that the PPA-Related Obligations are not severable from the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement and that the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement cannot be rejected in part, as Mirant was seeking to do. On December 16, the Creditors' Committee appealed the District Court's order to the Court of Appeals, and on December 20, 2004, Mirant also appealed the District Court's order. Mirant and the Creditors' Committee each filed its brief on April 4, 2005. Pepco's and FERC's briefs are due May 19, 2005. Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled.

     As more fully discussed below, Mirant had been making regular periodic payments in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations. On December 9, 2004, Mirant filed a notice with the Bankruptcy Court that it was suspending payments to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations. On December 13, 2004, Mirant failed to make a payment of approximately $17.9 million due to Pepco for the period November 1, 2004 to November 30, 2004. On December 23, 2004, Pepco received a payment of approximately $6.8 million from Mirant, which according to Mirant represented the market value of the power for which payment was due on December 13. At that time, Mirant informed Pepco that it intended to continue to pay the market value, but not the above-market portion, of the power purchased under the PPA-Related Obligations. Pepco disagreed with Mirant's assertion that it need only pay the market value and believed that the amount representing the market value calculated by Mirant was insufficient.

     On January 21, 2005, Mirant made a payment of approximately $21.1 million. Pepco disputed Mirant's contention that the amount paid reflected the full amount due Pepco under these agreements for the applicable periods.

     On January 21, 2005, Mirant filed in the Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking to reject certain of its ongoing obligations under the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, including the PPA-Related Obligations (the Second Motion to Reject). On March 1, 2005 (as amended by order dated March 7, 2005), the District Court granted Pepco's motion to withdraw jurisdiction over the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement rejection proceedings from the Bankruptcy Court. In addition, the District Court ordered Mirant to pay on March 18, 2005, all past-due unpaid amounts under the PPA-Related Obligations. On March 4, 2004, Mirant filed an emergency motion for reconsideration and a stay of the March 1, 2005 order. On March 14, 2005, Pepco filed a response to Mirant's motion.

     On March 16, 2005, the District Court denied Mirant's emergency motion for reconsideration and stay of the District Court's March 1 and March 7 Orders. On the same day, Mirant filed a petition for writ of mandamus, and a motion for stay pending appeal and mandamus review in the Court of Appeals.

     On March 17, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued an Order staying the District Court's Orders of March 1 and March 7, 2005. Accordingly, Mirant was not required to make the payment that was due to Pepco on March 18, 2005 pursuant to the District Court's Orders. On March 28, 2005, in accordance with the Court of Appeals March 17 Order, Pepco, FERC, the Maryland Public Service Commission (MPSC) and Office of the People's Counsel (OPC) of Maryland filed oppositions to Mirant's petition for writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeals. Mirant and the Creditor's Committee filed briefs with the Court of Appeals on April 1, 2005.

136
_____________________________________________________________________________

     On March 28, 2005, Pepco, FERC, the District of Columbia OPC, the MPSC and the Maryland OPC filed oppositions to the Second Motion to Reject in the District Court.

     On April 11, 2005 the Court of Appeals entered an Order vacating the stay it had ordered on March 17, 2005 and denying Mirant's motions for writ of mandamus and stay pending appeal. On April 13, 2005, Pepco received a payment from Mirant in the amount of approximately $57.5 million, representing the full amount then due in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations.

     Pepco is exercising all available legal remedies and vigorously opposing Mirant's attempt to reject the PPA-Related Obligations and other obligations under the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement in order to protect the interests of its customers and shareholders. While Pepco believes that it has substantial legal bases to oppose the attempt to reject the agreements, the outcome of Mirant's efforts to reject the PPA-Related Obligations is uncertain.

     If Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations, Pepco could be required to repay to Mirant, for the period beginning on the effective date of the rejection (which date could be prior to the date of the court's order granting the rejection and possibly as early as September 18, 2003) and ending on the date Mirant is entitled to cease its purchases of energy and capacity from Pepco, all amounts paid by Mirant to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations, less an amount equal to the price at which Mirant resold the purchased energy and capacity. Pepco estimates that the amount it could be required to repay to Mirant in the unlikely event that September 18, 2003, is determined to be the effective date of rejection, is approximately $185.6 million as of May 1, 2005.

     Mirant has also indicated to the Bankruptcy Court that it will move to require Pepco to disgorge all amounts paid by Mirant to Pepco in respect of the PPA-Related Obligations, less an amount equal to the price at which Mirant resold the purchased energy and capacity, for the period July 14, 2003 (the date on which Mirant filed its bankruptcy petition) through rejection, if approved, on the theory that Mirant did not receive value for those payments. Pepco estimates that the amount it would be required to repay to Mirant on the disgorgement theory, in addition to the amounts described above, is approximately $22.5 million.

     Any repayment by Pepco of amounts paid by Mirant would entitle Pepco to file a claim against the bankruptcy estate in an amount equal to the amount repaid. Pepco believes that, to the extent such amounts were not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, they would be recoverable as stranded costs from customers through distribution rates as described below.

     The following are estimates prepared by Pepco of its potential future exposure if Mirant's attempt to reject the PPA-Related Obligations ultimately is successful. These estimates are based in part on current market prices and forward price estimates for energy and capacity, and do not include financing costs, all of which could be subject to significant fluctuation. The estimates assume no recovery from the Mirant bankruptcy estate and no regulatory recovery, either of which would mitigate the effect of the estimated loss. Pepco does not consider it realistic to assume that there will be no such recoveries. Based on these assumptions, Pepco estimates that its pre-tax exposure as of May 1, 2005, representing the loss of the future benefit of the PPA-Related Obligations to Pepco, is as follows:

137
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

·

If Pepco were required to purchase capacity and energy from FirstEnergy commencing as of May 1, 2005, at the rates provided in the PPA (with an average price per kilowatt hour of approximately 5.9 cents) and resold the capacity and energy at market rates projected, given the characteristics of the FirstEnergy PPA, to be approximately 5.7 cents per kilowatt hour, Pepco estimates that it would cost approximately $6.4 million for the remainder of 2005, the final year of the FirstEnergy PPA.

·

If Pepco were required to purchase capacity and energy from Panda commencing as of May 1, 2005, at the rates provided in the PPA (with an average price per kilowatt hour of approximately 16.8 cents), and resold the capacity and energy at market rates projected, given the characteristics of the Panda PPA, to be approximately 9.0 cents per kilowatt hour, Pepco estimates that it would cost approximately $19 million for the remainder of 2005, approximately $29 million in 2006, approximately $30 million in 2007, and approximately $30 million to $44 million annually thereafter through the 2021 contract termination date.

     The ability of Pepco to recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate in respect to the Mirant Pre-Petition Obligations and damages if the PPA-Related Obligations are successfully rejected will depend on whether Pepco's claims are allowed, the amount of assets available for distribution to the creditors of the Mirant companies determined to be liable for those claims, and Pepco's priority relative to other creditors. At the current stage of the bankruptcy proceeding, there is insufficient information to determine the amount, if any, that Pepco might be able to recover from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, whether the recovery would be in cash or another form of payment, or the timing of any recovery.

     If Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations and Pepco's full claim is not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate, Pepco may seek authority from the MPSC and the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (DCPSC) to recover its additional costs. Pepco is committed to working with its regulatory authorities to achieve a result that is appropriate for its shareholders and customers. Under the provisions of the settlement agreements approved by the MPSC and the DCPSC in the deregulation proceedings in which Pepco agreed to divest its generation assets under certain conditions, the PPAs were to become assets of Pepco's distribution business if they could not be sold. Pepco believes that, if Mirant ultimately is successful in rejecting the PPA-Related Obligations, these provisions would allow the stranded costs of the PPAs that are not recovered from the Mirant bankruptcy estate to be recovered from Pepco's customers through its distribution rates. If Pepco's interpretation of the settlement agreements is confirmed, Pepco expects to be able to establish the amount of its anticipated recovery as a regulatory asset. However, there is no assurance that Pepco's interpretation of the settlement agreements would be confirmed by the respective public service commissions.

     If the PPA-Related Obligations are successfully rejected, and there is no regulatory recovery, Pepco will incur a loss. However, the accounting treatment of such a loss depends on a number of legal and regulatory factors, and is not determinable at this time.

     The SMECO Agreement

     As a term of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, Pepco assigned to Mirant a facility and capacity agreement with Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. (SMECO) under which Pepco was obligated to purchase the capacity of an 84-megawatt combustion turbine installed

138
_____________________________________________________________________________

and owned by SMECO at a former Pepco generating facility (the SMECO Agreement). The SMECO Agreement expires in 2015 and contemplates a monthly payment to SMECO of approximately $.5 million. Pepco is responsible to SMECO for the performance of the SMECO Agreement if Mirant fails to perform its obligations thereunder. At this time, Mirant continues to make post-petition payments due to SMECO.

     On March 15, 2004, Mirant filed a complaint with the Bankruptcy Court seeking a declaratory judgment that the SMECO Agreement is an unexpired lease of non-residential real property rather than an executory contract and that if Mirant were to successfully reject the agreement, any claim against the bankruptcy estate for damages made by SMECO (or by Pepco as subrogee) would be subject to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code that limit the recovery of rejection damages by lessors. Pepco believes that there is no reasonable factual or legal basis to support Mirant's contention that the SMECO Agreement is a lease of real property. Litigation continues and the outcome of this proceeding cannot be predicted.

      Mirant Plan of Reorganization

     On January 19, 2005, Mirant filed its Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement with the Bankruptcy Court. In that plan, Mirant proposed to transfer all assets to "New Mirant" (an entity it proposed to create in the reorganization), with the exception of the PPA-Related Obligations. Mirant proposed that the PPA-Related Obligations would remain in "Old Mirant," which would be a shell entity as a result of the reorganization. Pepco believes this plan cannot be confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court under the law and has submitted objections to the plan. The plan also did not have the support of any of the creditor's committees in the Mirant bankruptcy.

     On March 11, 2005, Mirant filed an application with FERC seeking approval for the internal transfers and corporate restructuring that will result from its proposed Plan of Reorganization. Mirant must obtain FERC approval for these transactions under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act. On April 1, 2005, Pepco filed a motion to intervene and protest at FERC in connection with Mirant's March 11 FERC filing. On the same date, the District of Columbia OPC also filed a motion to intervene and protest.

    On March 25, 2005, Mirant filed its First Amended Plan of Reorganization and First Amended Disclosure Statement. Pepco is currently analyzing this amended plan.

Rate Proceedings

     For a discussion of the history Pepco's distribution rate review case filed with the DCPSC, please refer to Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Regulatory and Other Matters -- Rate Proceedings" of Pepco's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. On April 7, 2005, the DCPSC approved a settlement of this proceeding, which provides that Pepco's current distribution rates will remain unchanged through the end of the rate cap periods set forth above, except as otherwise provided in the merger settlement, or as may otherwise be required by the Commission or by law.

139
_____________________________________________________________________________

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     No material changes to Pepco's critical accounting policies occurred during the first quarter of 2005. Accordingly, for a discussion of these policies, please refer to Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Pepco's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

FIN 47

     In March 2005, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) published FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, applies to conditional asset retirement obligations as defined and requires that the fair value of a reasonably estimable conditional asset retirement obligation be recognized as part of the carrying amounts of the asset. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005 (December 31, 2005 for Pepco). Pepco is in the process of evaluating the anticipated impact that the implementation of FIN 47 will have on its overall financial position or net results of operations.

RISK FACTORS

     For information concerning risk factors, please refer to Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Pepco's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

     Some of the statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include declarations regarding Pepco's intents, beliefs and current expectations. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential" or "continue" or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. Any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results could differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve estimates, assumptions, known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

     The forward-looking statements contained herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the following important factors, which are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties, are beyond Pepco's control and may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements:

140
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

·

Prevailing governmental policies and regulatory actions affecting the energy industry, including with respect to allowed rates of return, industry and rate structure, acquisition and disposal of assets and facilities, operation and construction of plant facilities, recovery of purchased power expenses, and present or prospective wholesale and retail competition;

·

Changes in and compliance with environmental and safety laws and policies;

·

Weather conditions;

·

Population growth rates and demographic patterns;

·

Competition for retail and wholesale customers;

·

General economic conditions, including potential negative impacts resulting from an economic downturn;

·

Growth in demand, sales and capacity to fulfill demand;

·

Changes in tax rates or policies or in rates of inflation;

·

Changes in project costs;

·

Unanticipated changes in operating expenses and capital expenditures;

·

The ability to obtain funding in the capital markets on favorable terms;

·

Restrictions imposed by PUHCA;

·

Legal and administrative proceedings (whether civil or criminal) and settlements that influence our business and profitability;

·

Pace of entry into new markets;

·

Volatility in market demand and prices for energy, capacity and fuel;

·

Interest rate fluctuations and credit market concerns; and

·

Effects of geopolitical events, including the threat of domestic terrorism.

     Any forward-looking statements speak only as to the date of this Quarterly Report and Pepco undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for Pepco to predict all of such factors, nor can Pepco assess the impact of any such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

     Pepco undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The foregoing review of factors should not be construed as exhaustive.

 

 

141
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 

 

142
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
    AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

GENERAL OVERVIEW

     Delmarva Power & Light Company (DPL) is engaged in the transmission and distribution of electricity in Delaware and portions of Maryland and Virginia. DPL also provides natural gas distribution service in northern Delaware . DPL's electricity distribution service territory covers approximately 6,000 square miles and has a population of approximately 1.28 million. As of March 31, 2005, approximately 63% of delivered electricity sales were to Delaware customers, approximately 34% were to Maryland customers, and approximately 3% were to Virginia customers. DPL also provides natural gas distribution service in Northern Delaware. DPL's natural gas distribution service territory covers approximately 275 square miles and has a population of approximately 523,000.

     DPL is a wholly owned subsidiary of PHI. Because PHI is a public utility holding company registered under PUHCA, the relationship between PHI and DPL and certain activities of DPL are subject to the regulatory oversight of the SEC under PUHCA.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     Other than the disclosures below, information under this item has been omitted in accordance with General Instruction H to the Form 10-Q. All amounts in the tables (except sales and customers) are in millions.

Electric Operating Revenue

 

2005

2004

Change

 

Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

$

96.1

 

$

97.0

 

$

(.9

)

 

Default Supply Revenue

 

158.5

   

148.2

   

10.3

   

Other Electric Revenue

 

4.0

   

5.6

   

(1.6

)

 

     Total Operating Revenue

$

258.6

$

250.8

$

7.8

     The table above shows the amounts of Electric Operating Revenue earned that is subject to price regulation (Regulated T&D (Transmission & Distribution) Electric Revenue and Default Supply Revenue) and that which is not subject to price regulation (Other Electric Revenue). Regulated T&D Electric Revenue includes revenue DPL receives for delivery of electricity to its customers. DPL provides Default Electricity Supply, which is the supply of electricity at regulated rates to retail customers in its service territories who do not elect to purchase electricity from a competitive supplier. Default Electricity Supply is also known as Default Service in Virginia, Standard Offer Service (SOS) in Maryland, as well as in Delaware on and after May 1, 2006, and Provider of Last Resort service (POLR) in Delaware before May 1, 2006. Default Supply Revenue is revenue received by DPL from Default Electricity Supply. The costs related to the supply of electricity are included in Fuel and Purchased Energy. Other Electric Revenue includes work and services performed on behalf of customers including other utilities, which is not subject to price regulation. Work and services includes mutual assistance to other utilities, highway relocation, rents, late payments, and collection fees.

143
_____________________________________________________________________________

      Regulated T&D Electric

Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

$

49.0

 

$

50.6

 

$

(1.6

)

 

Commercial

 

24.8

   

24.6

   

.2

   

Industrial

 

5.2

   

4.3

   

.9

   

Other (Includes PJM)

 

17.1

   

17.5

   

(.4

)

 

Total Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

$

96.1

$

97.0

$

(.9

)

Regulated T&D Electric Sales (GwH)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

1,609

   

1,591

   

18

   

Commercial

 

1,289

   

1,269

   

20

   

Industrial

 

739

   

789

   

(50

)

 

Other

 

12

   

12

   

-

   

     Total Regulated T&D Electric Sales

3,649

3,661

(12

)

Regulated T&D Electric Customers (000s)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

444

   

436

   

8

   

Commercial

 

58

   

57

   

1

   

Industrial

 

1

   

1

   

-

   

Other

 

1

   

1

   

-

   

     Total Regulated T&D Electric Customers

504

495

9

     Regulated T&D Electric Revenue decreased by $.9 million primarily due to warmer weather in the first three months of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Delivered sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were approximately 3,649,000 MwH compared to approximately 3,661,000 MwH for the comparable period in 2004. Heating degree days decreased by .9% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004.

      Default Electricity Supply

Default Supply Revenue

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

$

80.6

$

69.7

$

10.9

Commercial

 

57.9

   

55.7

   

2.2

   

Industrial

 

19.2

   

22.1

   

(2.9

)

 

Other (Includes PJM)

 

.8

   

.7

   

.1

   

     Total Default Supply Revenue

$

158.5

$

148.2

$

10.3

144
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

Default Electricity Supply Sales (GwH)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

1,613

   

1,588

   

25

   

Commercial

 

1,157

   

1,164

   

(7

)

 

Industrial

 

405

   

487

   

(82

)

 

Other

 

12

   

11

   

1

   

     Total Default Electricity Supply Sales

3,187

3,250

(63

)

Default Electricity Supply Customers (000s)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

443

   

436

   

7

   

Commercial

 

57

   

55

   

2

   

Industrial

 

1

   

1

   

-

   

Other

 

1

   

1

   

-

   

     Total Default Electricity Supply Customers

502

493

9

     Default Supply Revenue increased by $10.3 million, not withstanding a decline in sales, primarily due to the following: (i) $19.8 million due to higher retail energy rates, the result of the successful implementation of the SOS competitive bid procedure in Maryland beginning in June and July 2004, offset by (ii) $7.1 million increased customer migration, (iii) $.8 million unfavorable weather impact, and (iv) $1.6 million in other sales variances (offset in Fuel and Purchased Energy).

     For the three months ended March 31, 2005, DPL's Delaware customers served by an alternate supplier represented 10% of DPL's total Delaware load and DPL's Maryland customers served by alternate suppliers represented 19% of DPL's total Maryland load. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, DPL's Delaware customers served by an alternate supplier represented 12% of DPL's total Delaware load and DPL's Maryland customers served by alternate suppliers represented 11% of DPL's total Maryland load.

     Default Electricity Supply sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were approximately 3,187,000 MwH compared to approximately 3,250,000 MwH for the comparable period in 2004.

      Other Electric Revenue

      Other Electric Revenue decreased by $1.6 million primarily due to lower inter-company lease revenue.

Natural Gas Operating Revenue

 

2005

2004

Change

 

Regulated Gas Revenue

$

92.8

 

$

81.6

 

$

11.2

   

Other Gas Revenue

 

18.9

   

18.3

   

.6

   

     Total Natural Gas Operating Revenue

$

111.7

$

99.9

$

11.8

145
_____________________________________________________________________________

     The table above shows the amounts of Natural Gas Operating Revenue from sources that are subject to price regulation (Regulated Gas Revenue) and those that generally are not subject to price regulation (Other Gas Revenue). Regulated Gas Revenue includes the revenue DPL receives for on-system natural gas delivered sales and the transportation of natural gas for customers. Other Gas Revenue includes off-system natural gas sales and the release of excess system capacity.

      Regulated Gas

Regulated Gas Revenue

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

$

56.6

 

$

50.4

 

$

6.2

   

Commercial

 

31.6

   

27.2

   

4.4

   

Industrial

3.3

2.7

0.6

Transportation and Other

 

1.3

   

1.3

   

-

   

     Total Regulated Gas Revenue

$

92.8

$

81.6

$

11.2

Regulated Gas Sales (Bcf)

2005

2004

Change

 

Residential

 

4.4

   

4.6

   

(0.2

)

 

Commercial

 

2.7

   

2.7

   

-

   

Industrial

 

0.4

   

0.4

   

-

   

Transportation and Other

 

1.8

   

2.0

   

(0.2

)

 

     Total Regulated Gas Sales

 

9.3

   

9.7

   

(0.4

)

 

Regulated Gas Customers (000s)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

110

   

108

   

2

   

Commercial

 

9

   

9

   

-

   

Industrial

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

Transportation and Other

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

     Total Regulated Gas Customers

119

117

2

     DPL's natural gas service territory is located in New Castle County, Delaware. Several key industries contribute to the economic base as well as to growth.

·

Commercial activity in the region includes banking and other professional services, government, insurance, real estate, strip mall, stand alone construction, and tourism.

·

Industrial activity in the region includes automotive, chemical, and pharmaceutical.

     Regulated Gas Revenue increased by $11.2 million primarily due to the following: (i) $12.8 million increase, effective November 1, 2004, in the Gas Cost Rate due to higher natural gas commodity costs (offset in Gas Purchased) and (ii) $0.9 million increase in Gas Base Rates due to higher average rates. These increases were partially offset by (iii) $2.4 million decrease in sales due to lower customer usage. For the quarter ended March 31, 2005, gas sales were

146
_____________________________________________________________________________

approximately 9,300,000 Mcf as compared to approximately 9,700,000 Mcf for the comparable period in 2004. Heating degree days decreased 1.4% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.

      Other Gas Revenue

     Other Gas Revenue increased by $.6 million largely due to increased capacity release revenues and slightly higher off-system sales compared to the same period last year (offset in Gas Purchased).

Operating Expenses

      Fuel and Purchased Energy

     Fuel and Purchased Energy increased by $4.4 million to $162.2 million in 2005 from $157.8 million in 2004 due primarily to higher average energy costs, which are reflected in the new SOS rates for Maryland beginning in June and July 2004 (offset in Default Supply Revenue).

      Gas Purchased

    Gas Purchased increased by $11.4 million to $85.1 million in 2005 from $73.7 million in 2004. This increase primarily resulted from (i) $4.6 million due to increased wholesale commodity prices and less gas injected into storage, (ii) $3.8 million increase in deferred fuel costs, and (iii) $3.0 million increase from the settlement of financial hedges (entered into as part of DPL's regulated Natural Gas Hedge program). (Offsets in Regulated Gas Revenue and Other Gas Revenue).

      Other Operation and Maintenance

     Other Operation and Maintenance decreased by $3.7 million to $42.4 million in 2005 from $46.1 million in 2004. The decrease primarily resulted from: (i) $2.2 million lower system maintenance costs and (ii) $1.6 million lower employee pension and benefit expense, and (iii) $.6 million decrease in IT costs, partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in building lease costs.

      Depreciation and Amortization

     Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased by $.9 million to $19.0 million in 2005 from $18.1 million in 2004 due primarily to utility property additions.

      Other Taxes

     Other Taxes increased by $.4 million to $9.4 million in 2005 from $9.0 million in 2004. The increase primarily resulted from delivery tax related to an increase in gas revenue.

147
_____________________________________________________________________________

Income Tax Expense

     DPL's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was 46% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit), changes in estimates related to tax liabilities of prior tax years subject to audit, and the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences, partially offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits.

     DPL's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was 41% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit), and the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences, partially offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits.

 

 

 

148
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 

 

 

 

 

149
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
      AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY

GENERAL OVERVIEW

     Atlantic City Electric Company (ACE) is engaged in the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity in southern New Jersey. ACE's service territory covers approximately 2,700 square miles and has a population of approximately 998,000.

     ACE is a wholly owned subsidiary of PHI. Because PHI is a public utility holding company registered under PUHCA, the relationship between PHI and ACE and certain activities of ACE are subject to the regulatory oversight of the SEC under PUHCA.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     Other than the disclosures below, information under this item has been omitted in accordance with General Instruction H to the Form 10-Q. All amounts in the tables (except sales and customers) are in millions.

Operating Revenue

 

2005

2004

Change

 

Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

$

81.8

 

$

84.2

 

$

(2.4

)

 

Default Supply Revenue

 

223.6

   

232.0

   

(8.4

)

 

Other Electric Revenue

 

3.9

   

6.2

   

(2.3

)

 

     Total Operating Revenue

$

309.3

$

322.4

$

(13.1

)

      The table above shows the amounts of Operating Revenue earned that are subject to price regulation (Regulated T&D (Transmission & Distribution) Electric Revenue and Default Supply Revenue) and that which is not subject to price regulation (Other Electric Revenue). Regulated T&D Electric Revenue includes revenue ACE receives for delivery of electricity to its customers. ACE provides Default Electricity Supply, which is the supply of electricity at regulated rates to retail customers in its service territory who do not elect to purchase electricity from a competitive supplier. Default Electricity Supply is also known as Basic Generation Service (BGS) in New Jersey. Default Supply Revenue is revenue received by ACE from Default Electricity Supply. The costs related to the supply of electricity are included in Fuel and Purchased Energy. Also included in Default Supply Revenue is revenue from non-utility generators (NUGs), transition bond charges (TBC), market transition charges (MTC) and other restructuring related revenues (see Deferred Electric Service Cost). Other Electric Revenue includes work and services performed on behalf of customers including other utilities, which is not subject to price regulation. Work and services includes mutual assistance to other utilities, highway relocation, rents, late payments, and collection fees.

150
_____________________________________________________________________________

      Regulated T&D Electric

Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

$

40.6

 

$

41.9

 

$

(1.3

)

 

Commercial

 

24.4

   

25.0

   

(.6

)

 

Industrial

 

3.9

   

4.0

   

(.1

)

 

Other (Includes PJM)

 

12.9

   

13.3

   

(.4

)

 

     Total Regulated T&D Electric Revenue

$

81.8

$

84.2

$

(2.4

)

Regulated T&D Electric Sales (GwH)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

1,075

   

1,096

   

(21

)

 

Commercial

 

992

   

997

   

(5

)

 

Industrial

 

281

   

264

   

17

   

Other

 

12

   

13

   

(1

)

 

     Total Regulated T&D Electric Sales

2,360

2,370

(10

)

Regulated T&D Electric Customers (000s)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

463

   

457

   

6

   

Commercial

 

62

   

61

   

1

   

Industrial

 

1

   

1

   

-

   

Other

 

-

   

-

   

-

   

     Total Regulated T&D Electric Customers

526

519

7

      Regulated T&D Electric Revenue decreased by $2.4 million primarily due to the following: (i) $.8 million unfavorable weather impact, (ii) $.8 million related to network transmission revenue, and (iii) $.3 million due to customer sales mix. Delivered sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were approximately 2,360,000 MwH compared to approximately 2,370,000 MwH for the comparable period in 2004. Heating degree days decreased by 1.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004.

      Default Electricity Supply

Default Supply Revenue

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

$

75.2

 

$

76.5

 

$

(1.3

)

 

Commercial

 

54.2

   

57.2

   

(3.0

)

 

Industrial

 

9.8

   

11.4

   

(1.6

)

 

Other (Includes PJM)

 

84.4

   

86.9

   

(2.5

)

 

     Total Default Supply Revenue

$

223.6

$

232.0

$

(8.4

)

151
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

Default Electricity Supply Sales (GwH)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

1,080

   

1,080

   

-

   

Commercial

 

667

   

730

   

(63

)

 

Industrial

 

77

   

93

   

(16

)

 

Other

 

13

   

13

   

-

   

     Total Default Electricity Supply Sales

1,837

1,916

(79

)

Default Electricity Supply Customers (000s)

2005

2004

Change

 
                     

Residential

 

462

   

457

   

5

   

Commercial

 

61

   

60

   

1

   

Industrial

 

1

   

1

   

-

   

Other

 

1

   

1

   

-

   

     Total Default Electricity Supply Customers

525

519

6

      Default Supply Revenue is offset in operating expenses and has minimal earnings impact due to deferral accounting as a result of electric restructuring in New Jersey. The $8.4 million decrease in Default Supply Revenue primarily resulted from $6.7 million of lower sales and transmission due to increased customer migration.

      For the three months ended March 31, 2005, ACE's New Jersey customers served by an alternate supplier represented 22% of ACE's total load. For the three months ended March, 2004, ACE's New Jersey customers served by an alternate supplier represented 19% of ACE's total load.

     Default Electricity Supply Sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were approximately 1,837,300 MwH compared to approximately 1,916,400 MwH for the comparable period in 2004.

      Other Electric Revenue

     Other Electric Revenue decreased by $2.3 million primarily due to, (i) $1.8 million decrease in inter-company revenues, and (ii) $.6 million decrease in customer requested work.

Operating Expenses

      Fuel and Purchased Energy

     Fuel and Purchased Energy decreased by $5.5 million to $188.1 million in 2005 from $193.6 million in 2004. This decrease was primarily due to reduced PJM network transmission costs.

      Other Operation and Maintenance

     Other Operation and Maintenance decreased by $4.5 million to $47.3 million in 2005 from $51.8 million in 2004. The decrease primarily resulted from: (i) $2.1 million of lower restoration and system maintenance costs, (ii) $2.0 million for Default Electricity Supply costs, (iii) $1.7 million due to the transfer of the Deepwater plant to Conectiv Energy in 2004, and (iv) $.6 million lower IT costs, partially offset by (v) $1.0 million increase in building lease costs and (vi) $.9 million related to the NJBPU settlement.

152
_____________________________________________________________________________

      Depreciation and Amortization

     Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased by $4.0 million to $29.9 million in 2005 from $33.9 million in 2004 primarily due to a decrease in deferred transitional bond charges.

      Other Taxes

     Other Taxes increased by $1.3 million to $5.3 million in 2005 from $4.0 million in 2004. The increase primarily resulted from $1.6 million resulting from a New Jersey delivery tax expense true-up in 2004.

      Deferred Electric Service Costs

     Deferred Electric Service Costs (DESC) increased by $4.0 million to $19.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from $15.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The $4.0 million increase represents (i) $4.5 million in regulatory disallowances (net of amounts previously reserved) associated with the April 2005 NJBPU settlement agreement, (ii) $1.1 million in deferral write-offs associated with the NJBPU settlement agreement and offset by, (iii) $1.6 million net under-recovery associated with New Jersey BGS, NUGs, MTC and other restructuring items. Customers in New Jersey who do not choose a competitive supplier receive Default Electricity Supply from suppliers selected through auctions approved by the NJBPU. ACE's rates for the recovery of the costs of supplying this electricity are reset annually. On ACE's balance sheet a regulatory asset includes an under-recovery of $82.5 million as of March 31, 2005. This amount is net of a $47.3 million reserve on previously disallowed items under appeal.

      Other Income (Expenses)

     Other Expenses decreased by $.8 million to a net expense of $11.7 million in 2005 from a net expense of $12.5 million in 2004. This decrease is primarily due to lower interest expense.

Income Tax Expense

     ACE's effective tax rate before the extraordinary item for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was 38% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit), the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences, change in estimates related to tax liabilities of prior tax years subject to audit, and the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits.

     ACE's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was 42% as compared to the federal statutory rate of 35%. The major reasons for this difference are state income taxes (net of federal benefit), the flow-through of certain book tax depreciation differences, offset by the flow-through of deferred investment tax credits.

Extraordinary Item

     As a result of the settlement of ACE's electric distribution rate case, ACE reversed $15.2 million ($9.0 million, after-tax) in accruals related to certain deferred costs that are now deemed recoverable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

153
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 

 

 

 

154
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

I tem 3 .    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Pepco Holdings

     For information about PHI's derivative activities, refer to "Accounting for Derivatives" in Note 2 and "Use of Derivatives in Energy and Interest Rate Hedging Activities" in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of PHI included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

     PHI's risk management policies place oversight at the senior management level through the Corporate Risk Management Committee which has the responsibility for establishing corporate compliance requirements for the competitive energy segments' energy market participation. PHI uses a value-at-risk (VaR) model to assess the market risk of its competitive energy segments' other energy commodity activities and its remaining proprietary trading contracts. PHI also uses other measures to limit and monitor risk in its commodity activities, including limits on the nominal size of positions and periodic loss limits. VaR represents the potential mark-to-market loss on energy contracts or portfolios due to changes in market prices for a specified time period and confidence level. PHI estimates VaR using a delta-gamma variance / covariance model with a 95 percent, one-tailed confidence level and assuming a one-day holding period. Since VaR is an estimate, it is not necessarily indicative of actual results that may occur.

Value at Risk Associated with Energy Contracts
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
(Dollars in Millions)

Proprietary Trading VaR (1)

VaR for Competitive Energy Activity (2)

95% confidence level, one-day
   holding period, one-tailed (3)

   Period end

$ -

$ 6.1

   Average for the period

$ -

$ 4.3

   High

$ -

$ 6.1

   Low

$ -

$ 2.9

Notes:

(1)

Includes all remaining proprietary trading contracts entered into prior to cessation of this activity prior to March 2003.

(2)

This column represents all energy derivative contracts, normal purchase & sales contracts, modeled generation output and fuel requirements and modeled customer load obligations for both the discontinued proprietary trading activity and the ongoing other energy commodity activities.

(3)

As VaR calculations are shown in a standard delta or delta/gamma closed form 95% 1-day holding period 1-tail normal distribution form, traditional statistical and financial methods can be employed to reconcile prior 10-K and 10-Q VaRs to the above approach. In this case, 5-day VaRs divided by the square root of 5 equal 1-day VaRs; and 99% 1-tail VaRs divided by 2.326 times 1.645 equal 95% 1-tail VaRs. Note that these methods of conversion are not valid for converting from 5-day or less holding periods to over 1-month holding periods and should not be applied to "non-standard closed form" VaR calculations in any case.

155
_____________________________________________________________________________

     For additional quantitative and qualitative information on the fair value of energy contracts refer to Note 5, Use of Derivatives in Energy and Interest Rate Hedging Activities in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

     The competitive energy segments' portfolio of electric generating plants includes "mid-merit" assets and peaking assets. Mid-merit electric generating plants are typically combined cycle units that can quickly change their megawatt output level on an economic basis. These plants are generally operated during times when demand for electricity rises and power prices are higher. The competitive energy segments dynamically (economically) hedge both the estimated plant output and fuel requirements as the estimated levels of output and fuel needs change. Dynamic (or economic) hedge percentages include the estimated electricity output of and fuel requirements for the competitive energy segment's generation plants that have been economically hedged and any associated financial or physical commodity contracts (including derivative contracts that are classified as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133, other derivative instruments, wholesale normal purchase and sales contracts, and load service obligations).

     As of March 31, 2005, based on economic availability projections, 90% of generation output is economically hedged over the next 36 months. Fuel inputs for the same 36 month period are 54% hedged.

     Hedge volumes can vary significantly from period to period, where sales may exceed forecast plant output in some periods (a net short position), while in other periods sales may fall short of forecast output (a net long position).

 

 

 

156
_____________________________________________________________________________

    This table provides information on the competitive energy segment's credit exposure, net of collateral, to wholesale counterparties.

Schedule of Credit Risk Exposure on Competitive Wholesale Energy Contracts
(Dollars in Millions)

 

March 31, 2005

Rating (1)

Exposure Before Credit Collateral (2)

Credit Collateral (3)

Net Exposure

Number of Counterparties Greater Than 10% *

Net Exposure of Counterparties Greater Than 10%

Investment Grade

$347.1   

$20.5   

$326.6 

3

$186.7

Non-Investment Grade

5.3   

0.5   

4.8 

-

     -

Split rating

-   

-   

-

     -

No External Ratings

19.1   

-   

19.1 

-

     -

Credit reserves

-   

-   

1.0 

-

     -

           

(1)

Investment Grade - primarily determined using publicly available credit ratings of the counterparty. If the counterparty has provided a guarantee by a higher-rated entity (e.g., its parent), it is determined based upon the rating of its guarantor. Included in "Investment Grade" are counterparties with a minimum Standard & Poor's or Moody's rating of BBB- or Baa3, respectively. If it has a split rating ( i.e. , rating not uniform between major rating agencies), it is presented separately.

(2)

Exposure before credit collateral - includes the MTM energy contract net assets for open/unrealized transactions, the net receivable/payable for realized transactions and net open positions for contracts not subject to MTM. Amounts due from counterparties are offset by liabilities payable to those counterparties to the extent that legally enforceable netting arrangements are in place. Thus, this column presents the net credit exposure to counterparties after reflecting all allowable netting, but before considering collateral held.

(3)

Credit collateral - the face amount of cash deposits, letters of credit and performance bonds received from counterparties, not adjusted for probability of default, and if applicable property interests (including oil and gas reserves).

*

Using a percentage of the total exposure.

     For additional information concerning market risk, please refer to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk in Pepco Holdings' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Pepco

     For information concerning market risk, please refer to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk in Pepco's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

     INFORMATION FOR THIS ITEM IS NOT REQUIRED FOR DPL AND ACE AS THEY MEET THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION H(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q AND THEREFORE ARE FILING THIS FORM WITH A REDUCED FILING FORMAT.

157
_____________________________________________________________________________

Item 4 .   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Pepco Holdings, Inc.

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     Under the supervision, and with the participation of management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, Pepco Holdings has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2005, and, based upon this evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of Pepco Holdings have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to Pepco Holdings and its subsidiaries that is required to be disclosed in reports filed with, or submitted to, the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     During the three months ended March 31, 2005, there was no change in Pepco Holdings' internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Pepco Holdings' internal controls over financial reporting.

Potomac Electric Power Company

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     Under the supervision, and with the participation of management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, Pepco has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2005, and, based upon this evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of Pepco have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to Pepco and its subsidiaries that is required to be disclosed in reports filed with, or submitted to, the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     During the three months ended March 31, 2005, there was no change in Pepco's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Pepco's internal controls over financial reporting.

158
_____________________________________________________________________________

Delmarva Power & Light Company

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     Under the supervision, and with the participation of management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, DPL has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2005, and, based upon this evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of DPL have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to DPL that is required to be disclosed in reports filed with, or submitted to, the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

     During the three months ended March 31, 2005, there was no change in DPL's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, DPL's internal controls over financial reporting.

Atlantic City Electric Company

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     Under the supervision, and with the participation of management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, ACE has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2005, and, based upon this evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of ACE have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to ACE and its subsidiaries that is required to be disclosed in reports filed with, or submitted to, the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

    During the three months ended March 31, 2005, there was no change in ACE's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ACE's internal controls over financial reporting.

159
_____________________________________________________________________________

Part II    OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 .     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Pepco Holdings

Mirant Bankruptcy

     On July 14, 2003, Mirant and most of its subsidiaries filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. For additional information, please refer to Note (4), "Commitments and Contingencies," to the financial statements of PHI included herein.

ACE Appeal of New Jersey Deferral Proceeding

     In August 2004, ACE filed with the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey, which hears appeals of New Jersey administrative agencies, including the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU), a Notice of Appeal and a Case Information Statement related to the July 2004 Final Decision and Order issued by the NJBPU in ACE's restructuring deferral proceeding before the NJBPU under the New Jersey Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act. ACE cannot predict the outcome of this appeal. For additional information concerning the New Jersey regulatory proceeding leading up to this appeal, please refer to Note (4), "Commitments and Contingencies" to the financial statements of PHI included herein.

     For further information concerning litigation matters, please refer to Item 3, "Legal Proceedings," included in Pepco Holdings' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and Note (4), "Commitments and Contingencies," to the financial statements of PHI included herein.

Pepco

Mirant Bankruptcy

          On July 14, 2003, Mirant and most of its subsidiaries filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. For additional information, please refer to Note (4), "Commitments and Contingencies," to the financial statements of Pepco included herein.

     For further information concerning litigation matters, please refer to Note (4), "Commitments and Contingencies," to the financial statements of Pepco included herein.

DPL

     For information concerning litigation matters, please refer to Note (4), "Commitments and Contingencies," to the financial statements of DPL included herein.

160
_____________________________________________________________________________

ACE

     In August 2004, ACE filed with the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey, which hears appeals of New Jersey administrative agencies, including the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU), a Notice of Appeal and a Case Information Statement related to the July 2004 Final Decision and Order issued by the NJBPU in ACE's restructuring deferral proceeding before the NJBPU under the New Jersey Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act. ACE cannot predict the outcome of this appeal. For additional information concerning the New Jersey regulatory proceeding leading up to this appeal, please refer to Note (4), "Commitments and Contingencies" to the financial statements of ACE included herein.

     For additional information concerning litigation matters, please refer to Item 3, "Legal Proceedings," included in ACE's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and Note (4), "Commitments and Contingencies," to the financial statements of ACE included herein.

Item 2 .     UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(c)   Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.

Pepco Holdings

     None.

Pepco

     None.

     INFORMATION FOR THIS ITEM IS NOT REQUIRED FOR DPL AND ACE AS THEY MEET THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION H(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q AND THEREFORE ARE FILING THIS FORM WITH A REDUCED FILING FORMAT.

Item 3 .     DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Pepco Holdings

     None.

Pepco

     None.

     INFORMATION FOR THIS ITEM IS NOT REQUIRED FOR DPL AND ACE AS THEY MEET THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION H(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q AND THEREFORE ARE FILING THIS FORM WITH A REDUCED FILING FORMAT.

161
_____________________________________________________________________________

Item 4 .     SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Pepco Holdings

     None.

Pepco

     None.

     INFORMATION FOR THIS ITEM IS NOT REQUIRED FOR DPL AND ACE AS THEY MEET THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION H(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q AND THEREFORE ARE FILING THIS FORM WITH A REDUCED FILING FORMAT.

Item 5 .     OTHER INFORMATION

Pepco Holdings

     On May 5, 2005, Pepco Holdings, Pepco, DPL and ACE entered into a five-year credit agreement with an aggregate borrowing limit of $1.2 billion. This agreement replaces a $650 million five-year credit agreement that was entered into in July 2004 and a $550 million three-year credit agreement entered into in July 2003. Pepco Holdings' credit limit under this agreement is $700 million.  The credit limit of each of Pepco, DPL and ACE is the lower of $300 million and the maximum amount of debt the company is permitted to have outstanding by its regulatory authorities, except that the aggregate amount of credit used by Pepco, DPL and ACE at any given time under the agreement may not exceed $500 million in the aggregate. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the companies are entitled to request increases in the principal amount of available credit up to an aggregate increase of $300 million, with any such increase proportionately increasing the credit limit of each of the respective borrowers and the $300 million sublimits for each of Pepco, DPL and ACE.  The interest rate payable by the respective companies on utilized funds will be based on a pricing schedule determined by the credit rating of the borrower. The indebtedness incurred under the Credit Agreement is unsecured.

     The credit agreement is intended to serve primarily as a source of liquidity to support the commercial paper programs of the respective companies. The companies also are permitted to use the facility to borrow funds for general corporate purposes and issue letters of credit. In order for a borrower to use the facility, certain representations and warranties made by the borrower at the time the credit agreement was entered into also must be true at the time the facility is utilized, and the borrower must be in compliance with specified covenants, including the financial covenant described below. However, a material adverse change in the borrower's business, property, or financial condition subsequent to the entry into the credit agreement is not a condition to the availability of credit under the facility. Among the covenants contained in the credit agreement are (i) the requirement that each borrowing company maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization of 65% or less, computed in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, (ii) a restriction on sales or other dispositions of assets, other than sales and dispositions permitted by the credit agreement and (iii) a restriction on the incurrence of liens on the assets of a borrower or any of its significant subsidiaries other than liens permitted by the credit agreement.   The failure to satisfy any of the covenants or the occurrence of specified events that constitute events of default that could result in the acceleration of repayment

162
_____________________________________________________________________________

obligations of the borrower. The events of default include (i) the failure of any borrowing company or any of its significant subsidiaries to pay when due, or the acceleration of, certain indebtedness under other borrowing arrangements, (ii) certain bankruptcy events, judgments or decrees against any borrowing company or its significant subsidiaries, and (iii) a change in control (as defined in the credit agreement) of Pepco Holdings or the failure of Pepco Holdings to own all of the voting stock of Pepco, DPL and ACE. The agreement does not include any ratings triggers.

     PHI has had, currently has, or expects to have in the future various banking, underwriting, investment and other relationships with lenders that are parties to the credit agreement and their respective affiliates, including Wachovia Bank, N.A. which serves as a transfer agent and registrar for the PHI common stock, The Bank of New York which serves as trustee under various bond indentures, The Northern Trust Company, which serves as trustee for the Pepco Holdings Retirement Plan Master Trust and VEBA Trust and, Mizuho Corporate Bank (USA), which is the lender in a $50 million term loan to PHI due December 13, 2005.

Pepco

     On May 5, 2005, Pepco Holdings, Pepco, DPL and ACE entered into a five-year credit agreement with an aggregate borrowing limit of $1.2 billion. This agreement replaces a $650 million five-year credit agreement that was entered into in July 2004 and a $550 million three-year credit agreement entered into in July 2003. Pepco Holdings' credit limit under this agreement is $700 million.  The credit limit of each of Pepco, DPL and ACE is the lower of $300 million and the maximum amount of debt the company is permitted to have outstanding by its regulatory authorities, except that the aggregate amount of credit used by Pepco, DPL and ACE at any given time under the agreement may not exceed $500 million in the aggregate. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the companies are entitled to request increases in the principal amount of available credit up to an aggregate increase of $300 million, with any such increase proportionately increasing the credit limit of each of the respective borrowers and the $300 million sublimits for each of Pepco, DPL and ACE.  The interest rate payable by the respective companies on utilized funds will be based on a pricing schedule determined by the credit rating of the borrower. The indebtedness incurred under the Credit Agreement is unsecured.

     The credit agreement is intended to serve primarily as a source of liquidity to support the commercial paper programs of the respective companies. The companies also are permitted to use the facility to borrow funds for general corporate purposes and issue letters of credit. In order for a borrower to use the facility, certain representations and warranties made by the borrower at the time the credit agreement was entered into also must be true at the time the facility is utilized, and the borrower must be in compliance with specified covenants, including the financial covenant described below. However, a material adverse change in the borrower's business, property, or financial condition subsequent to the entry into the credit agreement is not a condition to the availability of credit under the facility. Among the covenants contained in the credit agreement are (i) the requirement that each borrowing company maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization of 65% or less, computed in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, (ii) a restriction on sales or other dispositions of assets, other than sales and dispositions permitted by the credit agreement and (iii) a restriction on the incurrence of liens on the assets of a borrower or any of its significant subsidiaries other than liens permitted by the credit agreement.   The failure to satisfy any of the covenants or the occurrence of specified events that constitute events of default that could result in the acceleration of repayment

163
_____________________________________________________________________________

obligations of the borrower. The events of default include (i) the failure of any borrowing company or any of its significant subsidiaries to pay when due, or the acceleration of, certain indebtedness under other borrowing arrangements, (ii) certain bankruptcy events, judgments or decrees against any borrowing company or its significant subsidiaries, and (iii) a change in control (as defined in the credit agreement) of Pepco Holdings or the failure of Pepco Holdings to own all of the voting stock of Pepco, DPL and ACE. The agreement does not include any ratings triggers.

     Pepco has had, currently has, or expects to have in the future various banking, underwriting, investment and other relationships with lenders that are parties to the credit agreement and their respective affiliates, including The Bank of New York, which serves as trustee under various Pepco bond indentures, The Northern Trust Company, which serves as trustee for the Pepco Holdings Retirement Plan Master Trust and VEBA Trust, and The Royal Bank of Scotland Finance (Ireland), which is the lender in a $100 million term loan to Pepco due December 1, 2006.

DPL

     On May 5, 2005, Pepco Holdings, Pepco, DPL and ACE entered into a five-year credit agreement with an aggregate borrowing limit of $1.2 billion. This agreement replaces a $650 million five-year credit agreement that was entered into in July 2004 and a $550 million three-year credit agreement entered into in July 2003. Pepco Holdings' credit limit under this agreement is $700 million.  The credit limit of each of Pepco, DPL and ACE is the lower of $300 million and the maximum amount of debt the company is permitted to have outstanding by its regulatory authorities, except that the aggregate amount of credit used by Pepco, DPL and ACE at any given time under the agreement may not exceed $500 million in the aggregate. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the companies are entitled to request increases in the principal amount of available credit up to an aggregate increase of $300 million, with any such increase proportionately increasing the credit limit of each of the respective borrowers and the $300 million sublimits for each of Pepco, DPL and ACE.  The interest rate payable by the respective companies on utilized funds will be based on a pricing schedule determined by the credit rating of the borrower. The indebtedness incurred under the Credit Agreement is unsecured.

     The credit agreement is intended to serve primarily as a source of liquidity to support the commercial paper programs of the respective companies. The companies also are permitted to use the facility to borrow funds for general corporate purposes and issue letters of credit. In order for a borrower to use the facility, certain representations and warranties made by the borrower at the time the credit agreement was entered into also must be true at the time the facility is utilized, and the borrower must be in compliance with specified covenants, including the financial covenant described below. However, a material adverse change in the borrower's business, property, or financial condition subsequent to the entry into the credit agreement is not a condition to the availability of credit under the facility. Among the covenants contained in the credit agreement are (i) the requirement that each borrowing company maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization of 65% or less, computed in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, (ii) a restriction on sales or other dispositions of assets, other than sales and dispositions permitted by the credit agreement and (iii) a restriction on the incurrence of liens on the assets of a borrower or any of its significant subsidiaries other than liens permitted by the credit agreement.   The failure to satisfy any of the covenants or the occurrence of specified events that constitute events of default that could result in the acceleration of repayment

164
_____________________________________________________________________________

obligations of the borrower. The events of default include (i) the failure of any borrowing company or any of its significant subsidiaries to pay when due, or the acceleration of, certain indebtedness under other borrowing arrangements, (ii) certain bankruptcy events, judgments or decrees against any borrowing company or its significant subsidiaries, and (iii) a change in control (as defined in the credit agreement) of Pepco Holdings or the failure of Pepco Holdings to own all of the voting stock of Pepco, DPL and ACE. The agreement does not include any ratings triggers.

     DPL also has had, currently has, or expects to have in the future various banking, underwriting, investment and other relationships with lenders that are parties to the credit agreement and their respective affiliates, including JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and The Bank of New York who serve as a trustee under various DPL bond indentures, and The Northern Trust Company, which serves trustee for the Pepco Holdings Retirement Plan Master Trust and VEBA Trust.

ACE

     On May 5, 2005, Pepco Holdings, Pepco, DPL and ACE entered into a five-year credit agreement with an aggregate borrowing limit of $1.2 billion. This agreement replaces a $650 million five-year credit agreement that was entered into in July 2004 and a $550 million three-year credit agreement entered into in July 2003. Pepco Holdings' credit limit under this agreement is $700 million.  The credit limit of each of Pepco, DPL and ACE is the lower of $300 million and the maximum amount of debt the company is permitted to have outstanding by its regulatory authorities, except that the aggregate amount of credit used by Pepco, DPL and ACE at any given time under the agreement may not exceed $500 million in the aggregate. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the companies are entitled to request increases in the principal amount of available credit up to an aggregate increase of $300 million, with any such increase proportionately increasing the credit limit of each of the respective borrowers and the $300 million sublimits for each of Pepco, DPL and ACE.  The interest rate payable by the respective companies on utilized funds will be based on a pricing schedule determined by the credit rating of the borrower. The indebtedness incurred under the Credit Agreement is unsecured.

     The credit agreement is intended to serve primarily as a source of liquidity to support the commercial paper programs of the respective companies. The companies also are permitted to use the facility to borrow funds for general corporate purposes and issue letters of credit. In order for a borrower to use the facility, certain representations and warranties made by the borrower at the time the credit agreement was entered into also must be true at the time the facility is utilized, and the borrower must be in compliance with specified covenants, including the financial covenant described below. However, a material adverse change in the borrower's business, property, or financial condition subsequent to the entry into the credit agreement is not a condition to the availability of credit under the facility. Among the covenants contained in the credit agreement are (i) the requirement that each borrowing company maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization of 65% or less, computed in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, (ii) a restriction on sales or other dispositions of assets, other than sales and dispositions permitted by the credit agreement and (iii) a restriction on the incurrence of liens on the assets of a borrower or any of its significant subsidiaries other than liens permitted by the credit agreement.   The failure to satisfy any of the covenants or the occurrence of specified events that constitute events of default that could result in the acceleration of repayment obligations of the borrower. The events of default include (i) the failure of any borrowing

165
_____________________________________________________________________________

company or any of its significant subsidiaries to pay when due, or the acceleration of, certain indebtedness under other borrowing arrangements, (ii) certain bankruptcy events, judgments or decrees against any borrowing company or its significant subsidiaries, and (iii) a change in control (as defined in the credit agreement) of Pepco Holdings or the failure of Pepco Holdings to own all of the voting stock of Pepco, DPL and ACE. The agreement does not include any ratings triggers.

     ACE has had, currently has, or expects to have in the future various banking, underwriting, investment and other relationships with lenders that are parties to the credit agreement and their respective affiliates, including The Bank of New York, which serves as trustee under various ACE bond indentures, and The Northern Trust Company, which serves as trustee for the Pepco Holdings Retirement Plan Master Trust and VEBA Trust.

Item 6 .     EXHIBITS

     The documents listed below are being filed or furnished on behalf of Pepco Holdings, Inc. (PHI), Potomac Electric Power Company (Pepco), Delmarva Power & Light Company (DPL), and Atlantic City Electric Company (ACE).

Exhibit
  No.  

Registrant(s)

Description of Exhibit

Reference

3.2.1

DPL

Bylaws

Filed herewith.

3.2.2

ACE

Bylaws

Filed herewith.

10.1

PHI
Pepco
DPL
ACE

Credit Agreement dated May 5, 2005

Filed herewith.

12.1

PHI

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

Filed herewith.

12.2

Pepco

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

Filed herewith.

12.3

DPL

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

Filed herewith.

12.4

ACE

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

Filed herewith.

31.1

PHI

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

Filed herewith.

31.2

PHI

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

Filed herewith.

31.3

Pepco

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

Filed herewith.

31.4

Pepco

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

Filed herewith.

31.5

DPL

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

Filed herewith.

31.6

DPL

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

Filed herewith.

31.7

ACE

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

Filed herewith.

31.8

ACE

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

Filed herewith.

32.1

PHI

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Furnished herewith.

32.2

Pepco

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Furnished herewith.

166
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

32.3

DPL

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Furnished herewith.

32.4

ACE

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Furnished herewith.

 

 

 

 

167
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 12.1    Statements Re. Computation of Ratios

PEPCO HOLDINGS

Three Months Ended 

For the Year Ended December 31,

March 31, 2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

(Dollar Amounts in Millions)

Income before extraordinary item (a)

$

47.6

$

255.5

$

211.1

$

220.2

$

192.3

$

369.1

Income tax expense

34.1

173.2

65.9

124.1

83.5

341.2

Fixed charges:

  Interest on long-term debt,
    amortization of discount,
    premium and expense

83.9

376.5

381.4

227.2

162.0

221.5

  Other interest

5.0

20.6

21.7

21.0

23.8

23.6

  Preferred dividend requirements
    of subsidiaries

.6

2.8

13.9

20.6

14.2

14.7

      Total fixed charges

89.5

399.9

417.0

268.8

200.0

259.8

Non-utility capitalized interest

(.1

)

(.1

)

(10.2

)

(9.9

)

(2.7

)

(3.9

)

Income before extraordinary
  item, income tax expense,
  and fixed charges

$

171.1

$

828.5

$

683.8

$

603.2

$

473.1

$

966.2

Total fixed charges, shown above

89.5

399.9

417.0

268.8

200.0

259.8

Increase preferred stock dividend
  requirements of subsidiaries to
  a pre-tax amount

.4

1.9

4.3

11.6

6.2

13.5

Fixed charges for ratio
  computation

$

89.9

$

401.8

$

421.3

$

280.4

$

206.2

$

273.3

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
  and preferred dividends

1.90

2.06

1.62

2.15

2.29

3.54

(a)

Excludes losses on equity investments.

168
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

Exhibit 12.2    Statements Re. Computation of Ratios

PEPCO

Three Months Ended 

For the Year Ended December 31,

March 31, 2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

(Dollar Amounts in Millions)

Net income (a)

$

11.5

$

96.6

$

104.6

$

141.2

$

192.3

$

369.1

Income tax expense

9.1

56.7

69.1

80.3

83.5

341.2

Fixed charges:

  Interest on long-term debt,
    amortization of discount,
    premium and expense

19.5

80.7

81.4

112.2

162.0

221.5

  Other interest

3.5

14.3

16.2

17.3

23.8

23.6

  Preferred dividend requirements
    of a subsidiary trust

-

-

4.6

9.2

9.2

9.2

      Total fixed charges

23.0

95.0

102.2

138.7

195.0

254.3

Non-utility capitalized interest

-

-

-

(.2

)

(2.7

)

(3.9

)

Income before income tax expense,
  and fixed charges

$

43.6

$

248.3

$

275.9

$

360.0

$

468.1

$

960.7

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

1.90

2.61

2.70

2.60

2.40

3.78

Total fixed charges, shown above

23.0

95.0

102.2

138.7

195.0

254.3

Preferred dividend requirements,
  excluding mandatorily redeemable
  preferred securities subsequent to
  SFAS No. 150 implementation,
  adjusted to a pre-tax amount

.5

1.6

5.5

7.8

7.2

10.6

Total fixed charges and
  preferred dividends

$

23.5

$

96.6

$

107.7

$

146.5

$

202.2

$

264.9

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
  and preferred dividends

1.86

2.57

2.56

2.46

2.32

3.63

(a)

Excludes losses on equity investments.

169
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 12.3    Statements Re. Computation of Ratios

DPL

Three Months Ended 

For the Year Ended December 31,

March 31, 2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

(Dollar Amounts in Millions)

Net income

$

23.8

$

66.3

$

53.2

$

49.7

$

200.6

$

141.8

Income tax expense

20.5

49.7

36.4

33.7

139.9

81.5

Fixed charges:

  Interest on long-term debt,
    amortization of discount,
    premium and expense

8.6

33.0

37.2

44.1

68.5

77.1

  Other interest

.5

2.2

2.7

3.6

3.4

7.5

  Preferred dividend requirements
    of a subsidiary trust

-

-

2.8

5.7

5.7

5.7

      Total fixed charges

9.1

35.2

42.7

53.4

77.6

90.3

Income before income tax expense,
  and fixed charges

$

53.4

$

151.2

$

132.3

$

136.8

$

418.1

$

313.6

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

5.87

4.30

3.10

2.56

5.39

3.47

Total fixed charges, shown above

9.1

35.2

42.7

53.4

77.6

90.3

Preferred dividend requirements,
  adjusted to a pre-tax amount

.6

1.7

1.7

2.9

6.3

7.7

Total fixed charges and
  preferred dividends

$

9.7

$

36.9

$

44.4

$

56.3

$

83.9

$

98.0

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
  and preferred dividends

5.51

4.10

2.98

2.43

4.98

3.20

 

170
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 12.4    Statements Re. Computation of Ratios

ACE

Three Months Ended 

For the Year Ended December 31,

March 31, 2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

(Dollar Amounts in Millions)

Income before extraordinary item

$

5.0

$

64.6

$

41.5

$

28.2

$

75.5

$

54.4

Income tax expense

3.0

42.3

27.3

16.3

46.7

36.7

Fixed charges:

  Interest on long-term debt,
    amortization of discount,
    premium and expense

14.5

62.2

63.7

55.6

62.2

76.2

  Other interest

.8

3.4

2.6

2.4

3.3

4.5

  Preferred dividend requirements
    of subsidiary trusts

-

-

1.8

7.6

7.6

7.6

      Total fixed charges

15.3

65.6

68.1

65.6

73.1

88.3

Income before extraordinary
  item, income tax expense,
  and fixed charges

$

23.3

$

172.5

$

136.9

$

110.1

$

195.3

$

179.4

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

1.52

2.63

2.01

1.68

2.67

2.03

Total fixed charges, shown above

15.3

65.6

68.1

65.6

73.1

88.3

Preferred dividend requirements
  adjusted to a pre-tax amount

.2

.5

.5

1.1

2.7

3.6

Total fixed charges and
  preferred dividends

$

15.5

$

66.1

$

68.6

$

66.7

$

75.8

$

91.9

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
  and preferred dividends

1.50

2.61

2.00

1.65

2.58

1.95

 

171
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

     I, Dennis R. Wraase, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Pepco Holdings, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)

Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

 

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:

 

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 9, 2005



   D. R. WRAASE                              
Dennis R. Wraase
Chairman of the Board, President
  and Chief Executive Officer

172
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

     I, Joseph M. Rigby, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Pepco Holdings, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)

Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

 

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:

 

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 9, 2005



 JOSEPH M. RIGBY                  
Joseph M. Rigby
Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer

173
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

     I, Dennis R. Wraase, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Potomac Electric Power Company.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:

 

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 9, 2005



   D. R. WRAASE                        
Dennis R. Wraase
Chairman of the Board and
  Chief Executive Officer

174
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

     I, Joseph M. Rigby, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Potomac Electric Power Company.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:

 

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 9, 2005



  JOSEPH M. RIGBY                    
Joseph M. Rigby
Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer

175
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 31.5

CERTIFICATION

     I, Thomas S. Shaw, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Delmarva Power & Light Company.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:

 

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 9, 2005



   T. S. SHAW                                      
Thomas S. Shaw
President and Chief Executive Officer

176
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 31.6

CERTIFICATION

     I, Joseph M. Rigby, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Delmarva Power & Light Company.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:

 

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 9, 2005



   JOSEPH M. RIGBY              
Joseph M. Rigby
Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer

177
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 31.7

CERTIFICATION

     I, William J. Sim, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic City Electric Company.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:

 

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 9, 2005



   WILLIAM J. SIM                            
William J. Sim
President and Chief Executive Officer

178
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 31.8

CERTIFICATION

     I, Joseph M. Rigby, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic City Electric Company.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:

 

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 9, 2005



  JOSEPH M. RIGBY         
Joseph M. Rigby
Chief Financial Officer

179
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 32.1

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

of

Pepco Holdings, Inc.

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

     I, Dennis R. Wraase, and I, Joseph M. Rigby, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pepco Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pepco Holdings, Inc.




May 9, 2005




   D. R. WRAASE                          

Dennis R. Wraase
Chairman of the Board, President
  and Chief Executive Officer




May 9, 2005




  JOSEPH M. RIGBY                    

Joseph M. Rigby
Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pepco Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Pepco Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

180
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 32.2

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

of

Potomac Electric Power Company

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

     I, Dennis R. Wraase, and I, Joseph M. Rigby, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Potomac Electric Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Potomac Electric Power Company.




May 9, 2005




  D. R. WRAASE                    

Dennis R. Wraase
Chairman of the Board and
  Chief Executive Officer




May 9, 2005



   JOSEPH M. RIGBY              

Joseph M. Rigby
Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Potomac Electric Power Company and will be retained by Potomac Electric Power Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

181
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 32.3

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

of

Delmarva Power & Light Company

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

     I, Thomas S. Shaw, and I, Joseph M. Rigby, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Delmarva Power & Light Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Delmarva Power & Light Company.




May 9, 2005




   T. S. SHAW                                    

Thomas S. Shaw
President and Chief Executive Officer




May 9, 2005




    JOSEPH M. RIGBY                    

Joseph M. Rigby
Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Delmarva Power & Light Company and will be retained by Delmarva Power & Light Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

182
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Exhibit 32.4

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

of

Atlantic City Electric Company

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

     I, William J. Sim, and I, Joseph M. Rigby, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic City Electric Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic City Electric Company.




May 9, 2005




  WILLIAM J. SIM                             

William J. Sim
President and Chief Executive Officer




May 9, 2005




   JOSEPH M. RIGBY                           

Joseph M. Rigby
Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Atlantic City Electric Company and will be retained by Atlantic City Electric Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

183
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each of the registrants has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

May 9, 2005

PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC. (PHI)
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (Pepco)
DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY (DPL)
ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY (ACE)
       (Registrants)

By        JOSEPH M. RIGBY             
        Joseph M. Rigby
        Senior Vice President and
        Chief Financial Officer,
            PHI, Pepco and DPL
        Chief Financial Officer, ACE

 

 

 

184
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS FILED HEREWITH

Exhibit No.

Registrant(s)

Description of Exhibit

3.2.1

DPL

Bylaws

3.2.2

ACE

Bylaws

10.1

PHI
Pepco
DPL
ACE

Credit Agreement dated May 5, 2005.

12.1

PHI

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

12.2

Pepco

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

12.3

DPL

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

12.4

ACE

Statements Re: Computation of Ratios

31.1

PHI

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

31.2

PHI

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

31.3

Pepco

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

31.4

Pepco

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

31.5

DPL

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

31.6

DPL

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

31.7

ACE

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

31.8

ACE

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

INDEX TO EXHIBITS FURNISHED HEREWITH

Exhibit No.

Registrant(s)

Description of Exhibit

32.1

PHI

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2

Pepco

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.3

DPL

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.4

ACE

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

185
_____________________________________________________________________________

 

DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

----

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS

----

ARTICLE I

OFFICES

                       Section 1.   Offices .  There shall be one registered office in the State of Delaware and one registered office in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Corporation may have offices at such other places both within and without the State of Delaware and within and without the Commonwealth of Virginia as the Board of Directors may from time to time determine or as may be necessary or convenient to the business of the Corporation.

ARTICLE II

MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS

                       Section 1.   Annual Meeting .  The annual meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation shall be held on such date, at such time, and at such place (if any) within or without the State of Delaware and within or without the Commonwealth of Virginia as shall be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors and stated in the notice of the meeting.

                       Section 2.   Special Meetings .  Special meetings of the stockholders of the Corporation shall be held on such date, at such time, and at such place (if any) within or without the State of Delaware and within and without the Commonwealth of Virginia as shall be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors and stated in the notice of the meeting.

                       Section 3.   Notice of Meetings and Record Date .  (a)  The Corporation shall give notice of any annual or special meeting of stockholders. Notices of meetings of the stockholders shall state the place, if any, date, and hour of the meeting. In the case of a special meeting, the notice shall state the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called. No business other than that specified in the notice thereof shall be transacted at any special meeting. Unless otherwise provided by applicable law or the Certificate and Articles of Incorporation (the "Certificate of Incorporation"), notice shall be given to each stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting not fewer than ten days or more than sixty days before the date of the meeting.

                                   (b)     Notice to stockholders may be given by writing in paper form or solely in the form of electronic transmission as permitted by this subsection (b). If given by writing in paper form, notice may be delivered personally, may be delivered by mail, or, with the consent of the stockholder entitled to receive notice, may be delivered by facsimile telecommunication or any of the other means of electronic transmission specified in this subsection (b). If mailed, such notice shall be delivered by postage prepaid envelope directed to each stockholder at such stockholder's address as it appears in the records of the Corporation. Any notice to stockholders given by the Corporation shall be effective if delivered or given by a form of electronic transmission to which the stockholder to whom the notice is given has consented.   Notice given  pursuant to  this subsection  shall be deemed given: (1)  if by facsimile

Adopted April 5, 2005
______________________________________________________________________________

telecommunication, when directed to a facsimile telecommunication number at which the stockholder has consented to receive notice; (2) if by electronic mail, when directed to an electronic mail address at which the stockholder has consented to receive notice; (3) if by posting on an electronic network together with separate notice to the stockholder of such specific posting, upon the later of (A) such posting and (B) the giving of such separate notice; and (4) if by any other form of electronic transmission, when consented to by the stockholder. An affidavit of the secretary or an assistant secretary or of the transfer agent or other agent of the Corporation that the notice has been given by personal delivery, by mail, or by a form of electronic transmission shall, in the absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein.

                                   (c)     Notice of any meeting of stockholders need not be given to any stockholder if waived by such stockholder in a writing signed by such stockholder, whether such waiver is given before or after such meeting is held.

                                   (d)     In order that the Corporation may determine the stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of stockholders or any adjournment thereof, the Board of Directors may fix a record date, which record date shall not precede the date upon which the resolution fixing the record date is adopted by the Board of Directors, and which record date shall not be more than sixty or fewer than ten days before the date of such meeting. If no record date is fixed by the Board of Directors, the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of stockholders or any adjournment thereof shall be at the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which notice is given, or, if notice is waived, at the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the meeting is held.

                       Section 4.   Quorum and Adjournment .  Except as otherwise required by law, by the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, or by these Bylaws, the presence, in person or represented by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the aggregate voting power of the stock issued and outstanding, entitled to vote thereat, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at all meetings of the stockholders. If such majority shall not be present or represented at any meeting of the stockholders, the stockholders present, although less than a quorum, shall have the power to adjourn the meeting to another time and place.

                       Section 5.   Adjourned Meetings .  When a meeting is adjourned to another time and place, if any, unless otherwise provided by these Bylaws, notice need not be given of the adjourned meeting if the date, time, and place are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken. At the adjourned meeting, the stockholders may transact any business that might have been transacted at the original meeting. A determination of stockholders of record entitled to notice of or to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall apply to any adjournment of such meeting; provided , however , that the Board of Directors may fix a new record date for the adjourned meeting. If an adjournment is for more than 30 days or, if after an adjournment, a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each stockholder entitled to vote at the meeting.

                       Section 6.   Vote Required .  Except as otherwise provided by law or by the Certificate of Incorporation:

- 2 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                                   (a)     Directors shall be elected by a plurality in voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at a meeting of the stockholders and entitled to vote in the election of directors; and

                                   (b)     Whenever any corporate action other than the election of directors is to be taken, it shall be authorized by a majority in voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at a meeting of stockholders and entitled to vote on the subject matter.

                       Section 7.   Manner of Voting; Proxies .  (a)  At each meeting of stockholders, each stockholder having the right to vote shall be entitled to vote in person or by proxy. Each stockholder shall be entitled to vote each share of stock having voting power and registered in such stockholder's name on the books of the Corporation on the record date fixed for determination of stockholders entitled to vote at such meeting.

                                   (b)     Each person entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders or to express consent or dissent to corporate action in writing without a meeting may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder by proxy, but no such proxy shall be voted or acted upon after eleven months from its date, unless the proxy provides for a longer period. A proxy shall be irrevocable if it states that it is irrevocable and if, and only so long as, it is coupled with an interest sufficient in law to support an irrevocable power. Proxies need not be filed with the Secretary of the Corporation until the meeting is called to order, but shall be filed before being voted. Without limiting the manner in which a stockholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder as proxy, the following shall constitute valid means by which a stockholder may grant such authority:

   

           (1)     A stockholder may execute a writing authorizing another person or persons to act for such stockholder as proxy. Execution may be accomplished by the stockholder or the stockholder's authorized officer, director, employee, or agent signing such writing or causing such person's signature to be affixed to such writing by any reasonable means including, but not limited to, by facsimile signature; and

   

 

           (2)     A stockholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder as proxy by transmitting or authorizing the transmission of a telegram, cablegram, or other means of electronic transmission to the person or persons who will be the holder of the proxy or to an agent of the proxyholder(s) duly authorized by such proxyholder(s) to receive such transmission; provided , however , that any such telegram, cablegram, or other means of electronic transmission must either set forth or be submitted with information from which it can be determined that the telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission was authorized by the stockholder. If it is determined that any such telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission is valid, the inspectors or, if there are no inspectors, such other persons making that determination, shall specify the information upon which they relied.

 

- 3 -
______________________________________________________________________________

Any copy, facsimile telecommunication, or other reliable reproduction of a writing or electronic transmission authorizing a person or persons to act as proxy for a stockholder may be substituted or used in lieu of the original writing or electronic transmission for any and all purposes for which the original writing or electronic transmission could be used; provided , however , that such copy, facsimile telecommunication, or other reproduction shall be a complete reproduction of the entire original writing or electronic transmission.

                       Section 8.   Stockholder Action Without a Meeting .  (a) Except as otherwise provided by law or by the Certificate of Incorporation, any action required to be taken at any meeting of stockholders of the Corporation, or any action that may be taken at any annual or special meeting of such stockholders, may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice, and without a vote, if a consent or consents in writing setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of all of the outstanding stock and shall be delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation; provided , however , that such delivery shall be by hand or by certified mail, return receipt requested.

                                   (b)     A telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission consenting to an action to be taken and transmitted by a stockholder or proxyholder, or by a person or persons authorized to act for a stockholder or proxyholder, shall be deemed to be written, signed, and dated for the purposes of these Bylaws, provided that any such telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission sets forth or is delivered with information from which the Corporation can determine (A) that the telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission was transmitted by the stockholder or proxyholder or by a person or persons authorized to act for the stockholder or proxyholder and (B) the date on which such stockholder or proxyholder or authorized person or persons transmitted such telegram, cablegram, or electronic transmission. Any consent by means of telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission shall be deemed to have been signed on the date on which such telegram, cablegram, or electronic transmission was transmitted. No consent given by telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission shall be deemed to have been delivered until such consent is reproduced in paper form and until such paper form shall be delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation. Delivery made to the Secretary of the Corporation shall be made by hand or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested.

                                   (c)     Any copy, facsimile, or other reliable reproduction of a consent in writing (or reproduction in paper form of a consent by telegram, cablegram, or electronic transmission) may be substituted or used in lieu of the original writing (or original reproduction in paper form of a consent by telegram, cablegram, or electronic transmission) for any and all purposes for which the original consent could be used, provided that such copy, facsimile, or other reproduction shall be a complete reproduction of the entire original writing (or original reproduction in paper form of a consent by telegram, cablegram, or electronic transmission).

                                   (d)     In order to determine the stockholders entitled to consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting, the Board of Directors may fix a record date. Such record date shall not precede the date upon which the resolution fixing the record date is adopted by the Board of Directors, and  shall not be more than ten days after the date upon which

- 4 -
______________________________________________________________________________

the resolution fixing the record date is adopted by the Board of Directions. If no record date has been fixed by the Board of Directors, the record date for determining stockholders entitled to consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting shall be the date on which the first Stockholder signs such written consent.

ARTICLE III

DIRECTORS

                       Section 1.   Number .  The number of directors that shall constitute the whole Board of Directors initially shall be one (1), and thereafter shall be such number of directors to be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by the Board of Directors.

                       Section 2.   Powers .  The Board of Directors shall exercise all of the powers of the Corporation except such as are by applicable law, by the Certificate of Incorporation of this Corporation, or by these Bylaws conferred upon or reserved to the stockholders of any class or classes or series thereof.

                       Section 3.   Resignations and Removal .  (a) Any director may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Board of Directors or the Secretary; provided , however , that if such notice is given by electronic transmission, such electronic transmission must either set forth or be submitted with information from which it can be determined that the electronic transmission was authorized by the director. Such resignation shall take effect at the date of receipt of such notice or at any later time specified therein. Acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective.

                                   (b)     Except as otherwise may be provided in the Certificate of Incorporation, any director or the entire Board of Directors may be removed with or without cause, by the holders of capital stock having a majority in voting power of the shares entitled to vote in the election of directors.

                       Section 4.   Regular Meetings .  Regular meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held on such dates and at such times and places, within or without the State of Delaware and within or without the Commonwealth of Virginia, as shall from time to time be determined by the Board of Directors, such determination to constitute the only notice of such regular meetings to which any director shall be entitled. In the absence of any such determination, such meetings shall be held, upon notice to each director in accordance with Section 7 of this Article III, at such times and places, within or without the State of Delaware and within or without the Commonwealth of Virginia, as shall be designated by the Chairman of the Board.

                       Section 5.   Special Meetings .  Special meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at the call of the Chairman of the Board at such times and places, within or without the State of Delaware and within or without the Commonwealth of Virginia, as he or she shall designate, upon notice to each director in accordance with Section 7 of this Article III. Special meetings shall be called by the Secretary on like notice at the written request of a majority of the directors then in office.

- 5 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                       Section 6.   Notice .  Notice of any regular (if required) or special meeting of the Board of Directors may be given verbally in person, verbally by telephone (including by leaving verbal notice on a message or recording device), or in writing. If in writing, notice shall be delivered personally, by mail, by facsimile transmission (directed to the facsimile transmission number for which the director has consented to receive notice), by telegram, by electronic mail (directed to such electronic mail address to which the director has consented to receive notice), or by other form of electronic transmission pursuant to which the director has consented to receive notice. If notice is given verbally in person, verbally by telephone, or in writing by personal delivery, by facsimile transmission, by telegram, by electronic mail, or by other form of electronic transmission pursuant to which the director has consented to receive notice, then such notice shall be given on not less than twenty-four hours' notice to each director. If written notice is delivered by mail, then it shall be given on not less than three (3) calendar days' notice to each director.

                       Section 7.   Waiver of Notice .  Notice of any meeting of the Board of Directors, or any committee thereof, need not be given to any member if waived by him or her in writing, whether before or after such meeting is held, or if he or she shall sign the minutes or attend the meeting, except that if such director attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting at the beginning of the meeting to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened, then such director shall not be deemed to have waived notice of such meeting.

                       Section 8.   Quorum and Powers of a Majority .  At all meetings of the Board of Directors and of each committee thereof, a majority of the members of the Board of Directors or of such committee shall be necessary and sufficient to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The act of a majority of the members present at any meeting of the Board of Directors or a committee thereof at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the Board of Directors or such committee, unless by express provision of law, of the Certificate of Incorporation, or of these Bylaws, a different vote is required, in which case such express provision shall govern and control. In the absence of a quorum, a majority of the members present at any meeting may, without notice other than announcement at the meeting, adjourn such meeting from time to time until a quorum is present.

                       Section 9.   Manner of Acting .  (a)  Members of the Board of Directors, or any committee thereof, may participate in any meeting of the Board of Directors or such committee by means of conference telephone or other communications equipment by means of which all persons participating therein can hear each other, and participation in a meeting by such means shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.

                                   (b)     Any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof may be taken without a meeting if all members of the Board of Directors or such committee, as the case may be, consent thereto in writing or by electronic transmission, and the writing or writings or electronic transmission or transmissions are filed with the minutes of proceedings of the Board of Directors or such committee; provided however , that such electronic transmission or transmissions must either set forth or be submitted with information from which it can be determined that the electronic transmission or transmissions were  authorized by  the director.   Such filing shall be in paper form if the minutes

- 6 -
______________________________________________________________________________

are maintained in paper form and shall be in electronic form if the minutes are maintained in electronic form.

                       Section 10.   Committees .  The Board of Directors may designate one or more committees, each committee to consist of one or more directors, which to the extent provided in said resolution or resolutions shall have and may exercise the powers and authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation, except as otherwise provided by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware or the Stock Corporation Act of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Board of Directors may designate one or more directors as alternate members of any committee to replace any absent or disqualified member of the committee. In the absence or disqualification of a member of a committee, the member or members present at any meeting of such committee and not disqualified from voting, whether or not such member or members constitute a quorum, may unanimously appoint another member of the Board of Directors to act at the meeting in place of such absent or disqualified director.

                       Section 11.   Committee Procedure, Limitations of Committee Powers .  (a)  Except as otherwise provided by these Bylaws, each committee shall adopt its own rules governing the time, place, and method of holding its meetings and the conduct of its proceedings and shall meet as provided by such rules or by resolution of the Board of Directors. Unless otherwise provided by these Bylaws or any such rules or resolutions, notice of the time and place of each meeting of a committee shall be given to each member of such committee as provided in Section 6 of this Article III with respect to notices of meetings of the Board of Directors.

                                   (b)     Each committee shall keep regular minutes of its proceedings and report the same to the Board of Directors when required.

                                   (c)     Any member of any committee may be removed from such committee either with or without cause, at any time, by the Board of Directors at any meeting thereof. Any vacancy in any committee shall be filled by the Board of Directors in the manner prescribed by the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws for the original appointment of the members of such committee.

                       Section 12.   Vacancies and Newly-Created Directorships .  Unless otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation or in these Bylaws, vacancies and newly-created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. Unless otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, when one or more directors shall resign from the Board, effective at a future date, a majority of directors then in office, including those who have resigned, shall have the power to fill such vacancy or vacancies, the vote thereon to take effect when such resignation or resignations shall become effective.

                       Section 13.   Compensation .  (a)  The Board of Directors, by a resolution or resolutions, may fix, and from time to time change, the compensation of Directors.

- 7 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                                   (b)     Each director shall be entitled to reimbursement from the Corporation for his or her reasonable expenses incurred with respect to duties as a member of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof.

                                   (c)     Nothing contained in these Bylaws shall be construed to preclude any director from serving the Corporation in any other capacity and from receiving compensation from the Corporation for service rendered to it in such other capacity.

ARTICLE IV

OFFICERS

                       Section 1.   Number .  (a)  The officers of the Corporation shall include a President, one or more Vice Presidents (including one or more Executive Vice Presidents and one or more Senior Vice Presidents if deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors), a Secretary, and a Treasurer. The Board of Directors also may elect such other officers as the Board of Directors may from time to time deem appropriate or necessary.

                                   (b)     The Chief Executive Officer shall have the power to appoint one or more employees of the Corporation as a regional president, vice president or other regional officer designation and fix the duties of such appointees. However, no such regional president, vice president or other regional officer designation shall be considered an officer of the Corporation.

                       Section 2.   Election of Officers, Term, and Qualifications .  The officers of the Corporation shall be elected from time to time by the Board of Directors and, except as may otherwise be expressly provided in a contract of employment duly authorized by the Board of Directors, shall hold office at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. Except for the Chairman of the Board and the Vice Chairman of the Board, none of the officers of the Corporation needs to be a director of the Corporation. Any two or more offices may be held by the same person to the extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and the Stock Corporation Act of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

                       Section 3.   Removal .  Any officer elected by the Board of Directors may be removed, either with or without cause, by the Board of Directors at any meeting thereof, or to the extent delegated to the Chairman of the Board, by the Chairman of the Board.

                       Section 4.   Resignations .  Any officer of the Corporation may resign at any time by giving notice to the Board of Directors or to the Chairman of the Board. Such resignation shall take effect at the date of the receipt of such notice or at any later time specified therein and, unless otherwise specified therein, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective.

                       Section 5.   Salaries .  The salaries of all officers of the Corporation shall be fixed by the Board of Directors from time to time, and no officer shall be prevented from receiving such salary by reason of the fact that he or she also is a director of the Corporation.

- 8 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                       Section 6.   Chief Executive Officer .  The Chief Executive Officer shall have, subject to the supervision, direction and control of the Board of Directors, the general powers and duties of supervision, direction and management of affairs and business of the Corporation usually vested in the chief executive officer of a corporation, including, without limitation, all powers necessary to direct and control the organizational reporting relationships within the Corporation. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be delegated to him or her by the Board of Directors. If at any time the offices of the Chairman of the Board and the Vice Chairman of the Board shall not be filled, or in the event of the temporary absence or disability of the Chairman of the Board and the Vice Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer shall have the powers and duties of the Chairman of the Board.

                       Section 7.   The President .  The President shall serve as the chief operating officer of the Corporation. The President shall have, subject to the supervision, direction and control of the Board of Directors, the general powers and duties customarily and usually associated with the office of the President and shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be delegated to him or her from time to time by the Board of Directors or the Chief Executive Officer.

                       Section 8.   The Vice Presidents .  Each Vice President, if any shall be elected, shall have such powers and perform such duties as may from time to time be assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors or the President.

                       Section 9.   The Secretary and Assistant Secretaries .  (a)  The Secretary shall attend meetings of the Board of Directors and meetings of the stockholders and record all votes and minutes of all such proceedings in a book or books kept for such purpose. The Secretary shall have all such further powers and duties as are customarily and usually associated with the position of Secretary or as may from time to time be assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors or the President.

                                   (b)     Each Assistant Secretary shall have such powers and perform such duties as may from time to time be assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors, the President, or the Secretary. In the case of absence or disability of the Secretary, the Assistant Secretary designated by the President (or, in the absence of such designation, by the Secretary) shall perform the duties and exercise the powers of the Secretary.

                       Section 10. The Treasurer and Assistant Treasurers . (a) The Treasurer shall have custody of the Corporation's funds and securities, shall be responsible for maintaining the Corporation's accounting records and statements, shall keep full and accurate accounts of receipts and disbursements in books belonging to the Corporation, and shall deposit or cause to be deposited moneys or other valuable effects in the name and to the credit of the Corporation in such depositories as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The Treasurer also shall maintain adequate records of all assets, liabilities, and transactions of the Corporation and shall assure that adequate audits thereof are currently and regularly made. The Treasurer shall have all such  further  powers and duties  as are customarily  and usually  associated  with the  position of

- 9 -
______________________________________________________________________________

Treasurer or as may from time to time be assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors or the President.

                                   (b)     Each Assistant Treasurer shall have such powers and perform such duties as may from time to time be assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors or the Treasurer. In the case of absence or disability of the Treasurer, the Assistant Treasurer designated by the President (or, in the absence of such designation, by the Treasurer) shall perform the duties and exercise the powers of the Treasurer.

ARTICLE V

STOCK

                       Section 1.   Certificates .  The shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be represented by certificates, unless the Board of Directors provides by resolution or resolutions that some or all of the shares of any class or classes, or series thereof, of the Corporation's capital stock shall be uncertificated. Notwithstanding the adoption of any such resolution or resolutions by the Board of Directors providing for uncertificated shares, to the extent required by law, every holder of capital stock of the Corporation represented by certificates, and upon request, every holder of uncertificated shares, shall be entitled to a certificate representing such shares. Certificates for shares of stock of the Corporation shall be issued under the seal of the Corporation, or a facsimile thereof, and shall be numbered and shall be entered in the books of the Corporation as they are issued. Each certificate shall bear a serial number, shall exhibit the holder's name and the number of shares evidenced thereby, and shall be signed by the Chairman of the Board or a Vice Chairman, if any, or the President or any Vice President, and by the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary or the Treasurer or an Assistant Treasurer. Any or all of the signatures on the certificate may be a facsimile. If any officer, transfer agent, or registrar who has signed or whose facsimile signature has been placed upon a certificate shall have ceased to be such officer, transfer agent, or registrar before such certificate is issued, the certificate may be issued by the Corporation with the same effect as if such person or entity were such officer, transfer agent, or registrar at the date of issue.

                       Section 2.   Transfers .  Transfers of stock of the Corporation shall be made on the books of the Corporation only upon surrender to the Corporation of a certificate (if any) for the shares duly endorsed or accompanied by proper evidence of succession, assignment, or authority to transfer; provided , however , that such succession, assignment, or transfer is not prohibited by the Certificate of Incorporation, these Bylaws, applicable law, or contract. Thereupon, the Corporation shall issue a new certificate (if requested) to the person entitled thereto, cancel the old certificate (if any), and record the transaction upon its books.

                       Section 3.   Lost, Stolen, or Destroyed Certificates .  Any person claiming a certificate of stock to be lost, stolen, or destroyed shall make an affidavit or an affirmation of that fact, and shall give the Corporation a bond of indemnity in satisfactory form and with one or more satisfactory sureties, whereupon a new certificate (if requested) may be issued of the same tenor and for the same number of shares as the one alleged to be lost, stolen, or destroyed.

- 10 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                       Section 4.   Registered Stockholders .  The names and addresses of the holders of record of the shares of each class and series of the Corporation's capital stock, together with the number of shares of each class and series held by each record holder and the date of issue of such shares, shall be entered on the books of the Corporation. The Corporation shall be entitled to recognize the exclusive right of a person registered on its books as the owner of shares of capital stock of the Corporation as the person entitled to exercise the rights of a stockholder, including, without limitation, the right to vote in person or by proxy at any meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation. The Corporation shall not be bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to or interest in any such shares on the part of any other person, whether or not it shall have express or other notice thereof, except as otherwise expressly provided by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and the Stock Corporation Act of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

                       Section 5.   Additional Powers of the Board .  (a)  In addition to those powers set forth in Section 2 of Article III, the Board of Directors shall have power and authority to make all such rules and regulations as it shall deem expedient concerning the issue, transfer, and registration of certificates for shares of stock of the Corporation, including the use of uncertificated shares of stock, subject to the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and the Stock Corporation Act of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Certificate of Incorporation, and these Bylaws.

                                   (b)     The Board of Directors may appoint and remove transfer agents and registrars of transfers, and may require all stock certificates to bear the signature of any such transfer agent and/or any such registrar of transfers.

ARTICLE VI

INDEMNIFICATION

                       Section 1.   Indemnification .  (a)  The Corporation shall indemnify, to the full extent that it shall have power under applicable law to do so and in a manner permitted by such law, any person made or threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative (hereinafter, a "Proceeding"), by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of Corporation as a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, including service with respect to an employee benefit plan (collectively, "Another Enterprise").

                                   (b)     The Corporation may indemnify, to the full extent that it shall have power under applicable law to do so and in a manner permitted by such law, any person made or threatened to be made a party to any Proceeding, by reason of the fact that such person is or was an employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as an employee or agent of Another Enterprise.

- 11 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                       Section 2.   Advancement of Expenses .  (a)  With respect to any person made or threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed Proceeding, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the Corporation or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director or officer of Another Enterprise, the Corporation shall pay the expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by such person in defending any such Proceeding in advance of its final disposition (hereinafter an "advancement of expenses"); provided , however , that any advancement of expenses shall be made only upon (i) receipt of a written statement from such person of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct under applicable law, (ii) receipt of an undertaking (hereinafter an "undertaking") by such person to repay all amounts advanced if it shall ultimately be determined by final judicial decision from which there is no further right to appeal (hereinafter a "Final Adjudication") that such person is not entitled to be indemnified for such expenses under this Article VI or otherwise and (iii) a determination that the facts known to those making the determination would not preclude indemnification under applicable law. The determination referred to in clause (iii) shall be made in accordance with applicable law. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, with respect to a Proceeding (or part thereof) initiated against the Corporation by a director or officer of the Corporation (or by a person serving at the request of the Corporation as a director or officer of Another Enterprise), the Corporation shall not be required to indemnify or to pay the expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by such person in prosecuting such Proceeding (or part thereof) or in defending any counterclaim, cross-claim, affirmative defense, or like claim of the Corporation in connection with such Proceeding (or part thereof) in advance of the final disposition of such Proceeding (or part thereof) unless such Proceeding was authorized by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

                                   (b)     With respect to any person made or threatened to be made a party to any Proceeding, by reason of the fact that such person is or was an employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as an employee or agent of Another Enterprise, the Corporation may, in its discretion and upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the Corporation deems appropriate, pay the expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by such person in defending any such Proceeding in advance of its final disposition.

                       Section 3.   Contract Rights .  With respect to any person made or threatened to be made a party to any Proceeding, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director or officer of Another Enterprise, the rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses conferred in Sections 1(a) and 2(a) of this Article VI shall be contract rights.

                       Section 4. Claims .  (a)  If (X) a claim under Section 1(a) of this Article VI with respect to any right to indemnification is not paid in full by the Corporation within sixty days after a written demand has been received by the Corporation or (Y) a claim under Section 2(a) of this Article VI with respect to any right to the advancement of expenses is not paid in full by the Corporation within twenty days after a written demand has been received by the Corporation, then the person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification or to an advancement of expenses, as the case may be, may at any time thereafter bring suit against the Corporation to recover the unpaid amount of the claim.

- 12 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                                   (b)     If successful in whole or in part in any suit brought pursuant to Section 4(a) of this Article VI, or in a suit brought by the Corporation to recover an advancement of expenses (whether pursuant to the terms of an undertaking or otherwise), the person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification or an advancement of expenses hereunder or the person from whom the Corporation sought to recover an advancement of expenses, as the case may be, shall be entitled to be paid by the Corporation the reasonable expenses (including attorneys' fees) of prosecuting or defending such suit.

                                   (c)     In any suit brought by a person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification hereunder (but not a suit brought by a person seeking to enforce a right to an advancement of expenses hereunder), it shall be a defense that the person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification has not met any applicable standard for indemnification under applicable law. With respect to any suit brought by a person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification or right to advancement of expenses hereunder or any suit brought by the Corporation to recover an advancement of expenses (whether pursuant to the terms of an undertaking or otherwise), neither (i) the failure of the Corporation to have made a determination prior to commencement of such suit that indemnification of such person is proper in the circumstances because such person has met the applicable standards of conduct under applicable law, nor (ii) an actual determination by the Corporation that such person has not met such applicable standards of conduct, shall create a presumption that such person has not met the applicable standards of conduct or, in a case brought by such person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification, be a defense to such suit.

                                   (d)     In any suit brought by a person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification or to an advancement of expenses hereunder, or by the Corporation to recover an advancement of expenses (whether pursuant to the terms of an undertaking or otherwise), the burden shall be on the Corporation to prove that the person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification or to an advancement of expenses or the person from whom the Corporation seeks to recover an advancement of expenses is not entitled to be indemnified, or to such an advancement of expenses, under this Article VI or otherwise.

                       Section 5.   Non-Exclusive Rights .  The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided in this Article VI shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which any person may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise, both as to action in such person's official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office, and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be such director, officer, employee, or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and administrators of such person.

                       Section 6.   Insurance .  The Corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee, or agent of Another Enterprise against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of such person's status as such, whether or not the Corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such liability under the provisions of this Article VI or otherwise.

- 13 -
______________________________________________________________________________

ARTICLE VII

MISCELLANEOUS

                       Section 1.   Books and Records .  (a)  Any books or records maintained by the Corporation in the regular course of its business, including its stock ledger, books of account, and minute books, may be kept on, or by means of, or be in the form of, any information storage device or method; provided , however , that the books and records so kept can be converted into clearly legible paper form within a reasonable time. The Corporation shall so convert any books or records so kept upon the request of any person entitled to inspect such records pursuant to the Certificate of Incorporation, these Bylaws, or the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and the Stock Corporation Act of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

                                   (b)     It shall be the duty of the Secretary or other officer of the Corporation who shall have charge of the stock ledger to prepare and make, at least ten days before every meeting of the stockholders, a complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote thereat, arranged in alphabetical order, and showing the address of each stockholder and the number of shares registered in the stockholder's name. Nothing contained in this subsection (b) shall require the Corporation to include electronic mail addresses or other electronic contact information on such list. Such list shall be open to the examination of any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting for a period of at least 10 days prior to the meeting: (i) on a reasonably accessible electronic network, provided that the information required to gain access to such list is provided with the notice of the meeting, or (ii) during ordinary business hours, at the principal place of business of the Corporation. In the event that the Corporation determines to make the list available on an electronic network, the Corporation may take reasonable steps to ensure that such information is available only to stockholders of the Corporation. If the meeting is to be held at a place, then the list shall be produced and kept at the time and place of the meeting during the whole time thereof, and may be inspected by any stockholder who is present. The stock ledger shall be the only evidence of the identity of the stockholders entitled to examine such list.

                                   (c)     Except to the extent otherwise required by law, or by the Certificate of Incorporation, or by these Bylaws, the Board of Directors shall determine from time to time whether and, if allowed, when and under what conditions and regulations the stock ledger, books, records, and accounts of the Corporation, or any of them, shall be open to inspection by the stockholders and the stockholders' rights, if any, in respect thereof. The stock ledger shall be the only evidence of the identity of the stockholders entitled to examine the stock ledger, the books, records, or accounts of the Corporation.

                       Section 2.   Voting Shares in Other Business Entities .  The President or any other officer of the Corporation designated by the Board of Directors may vote any and all shares of stock or other equity interest held by the Corporation in any other corporation or other business entity, and may exercise on behalf of the Corporation any and all rights and powers incident to the ownership of such stock or other equity interest.

- 14 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                       Section 3.   Record Date for Distributions and Other Actions .  In order that the Corporation may determine the stockholders entitled to receive payment of any dividend or other distribution, or allotment of any rights, or the stockholders entitled to exercise any rights in respect of any change, conversion, or exchange of capital stock, or for the purpose of any other lawful action, except as may otherwise be provided in these Bylaws, the Board of Directors may fix a record date. Such record date shall not precede the date upon which the resolution fixing such record date is adopted, and shall not be more than sixty days prior to such action. If no record date is fixed, the record date for determining stockholders for any such purpose shall be the close of business on the day on which the Board of Directors adopts the resolution relating thereto.

                       Section 4.   Fiscal Year .  The fiscal year of the Corporation shall be such fiscal year as the Board of Directors from time to time by resolution shall determine.

                       Section 5.   Electronic Transmission .  For purposes of these Bylaws, "electronic transmission" means any form of communication, not directly involving the physical transmission of paper, that creates a record that may be retained, retrieved, and reviewed by a recipient thereof, and that may be directly reproduced in paper form by such a recipient through an automated process.

                       Section 6.   Amendment .  These Bylaws may be altered, amended, or repealed at any meeting of the Board of Directors, or at any meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation.

END OF BYLAWS

- 15 -
______________________________________________________________________________

ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY
(a New Jersey Corporation)

----

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS

----

ARTICLE I

OFFICES

                       Section 1.   Offices .  The registered office shall be in the State of New Jersey. The Corporation may have offices at such other places both within and without the State of New Jersey as the Board of Directors may from time to time determine or as may be necessary or convenient to the business of the Corporation.

ARTICLE II

MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS

                       Section 1.   Annual Meeting .  The annual meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation shall be held on such date, at such time, and at such place (if any) within or without the State of Delaware as shall be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors and stated in the notice of the meeting. In lieu of holding an annual meeting of stockholders at a designated place, the Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, determine that any annual meeting of stockholders may be held solely by means of remote communication.

                       Section 2.   Special Meetings .  Special meetings of the stockholders of the Corporation shall be held on such date, at such time, and at such place (if any) within or without the State of Delaware as shall be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors and stated in the notice of the meeting. In lieu of holding a special meeting of stockholders at a designated place, the Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, determine that any special meeting of stockholders may be held solely by means of remote communication.

                       Section 3.   Notice of Meetings and Record Date .  (a)  The Corporation shall give notice of any annual or special meeting of stockholders. Notices of meetings of the stockholders shall state the place, if any, date, and hour of the meeting, and the means of remote communication, if any, by which stockholders and proxyholders may be deemed to be present in person and vote at such meeting. In the case of a special meeting, the notice shall state the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called. No business other than that specified in the notice thereof shall be transacted at any special meeting. Unless otherwise provided by applicable law or the Certificate of Incorporation, notice shall be given to each stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting not fewer than ten days or more than sixty days before the date of the meeting.

                                   (b)     Notice to stockholders may be given by writing in paper form or solely  in  the form  of  electronic transmission  as permitted by  this subsection (b).   If given  by

Adopted April 5, 2005
______________________________________________________________________________

writing in paper form, notice may be delivered personally, may be delivered by mail, or, with the consent of the stockholder entitled to receive notice, may be delivered by facsimile telecommunication or any of the other means of electronic transmission specified in this subsection (b). If mailed, such notice shall be delivered by postage prepaid envelope directed to each stockholder at such stockholder's address as it appears in the records of the Corporation. Any notice to stockholders given by the Corporation shall be effective if delivered or given by a form of electronic transmission to which the stockholder to whom the notice is given has consented. Notice given pursuant to this subsection shall be deemed given: (1) if by facsimile telecommunication, when directed to a facsimile telecommunication number at which the stockholder has consented to receive notice; (2) if by electronic mail, when directed to an electronic mail address at which the stockholder has consented to receive notice; (3) if by posting on an electronic network together with separate notice to the stockholder of such specific posting, upon the later of (A) such posting and (B) the giving of such separate notice; and (4) if by any other form of electronic transmission, when directed to the stockholder. An affidavit of the secretary or an assistant secretary or of the transfer agent or other agent of the Corporation that the notice has been given by personal delivery, by mail, or by a form of electronic transmission shall, in the absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein.

                                   (c)     Notice of any meeting of stockholders need not be given to any stockholder if waived by such stockholder either in a writing signed by such stockholder or by electronic transmission, whether such waiver is given before or after such meeting is held. If such a waiver is given by electronic transmission, the electronic transmission must either set forth or be submitted with information from which it can be determined that the electronic transmission was authorized by the stockholder.

                                   (d)     In order that the Corporation may determine the stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of stockholders or any adjournment thereof, the Board of Directors may fix a record date, which record date shall not precede the date upon which the resolution fixing the record date is adopted by the Board of Directors, and which record date shall not be more than sixty or fewer than ten days before the date of such meeting. If no record date is fixed by the Board of Directors, the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of stockholders or any adjournment thereof shall be at the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which notice is given, or, if notice is waived, at the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the meeting is held.

                       Section 4.   Quorum and Adjournment .  Except as otherwise required by law, by the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, or by these Bylaws, the presence, in person or represented by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the aggregate voting power of the stock issued and outstanding, entitled to vote thereat, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at all meetings of the stockholders. If such majority shall not be present or represented at any meeting of the stockholders, the stockholders present, although less than a quorum, shall have the power to adjourn the meeting to another time and place.

                       Section 5.   Adjourned Meetings .  When a meeting is adjourned to another time and place,  if  any,  unless  otherwise  provided  by these  Bylaws,  notice  need  not  be  given  of  the

- 2-
______________________________________________________________________________

adjourned meeting if the date, time, and place, if any, thereof and the means of remote communication, if any, by which stockholders and proxyholders may be deemed to be present in person and vote at such adjourned meeting, are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken. At the adjourned meeting, the stockholders may transact any business that might have been transacted at the original meeting. A determination of stockholders of record entitled to notice of or to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall apply to any adjournment of such meeting; provided , however , that the Board of Directors may fix a new record date for the adjourned meeting. If an adjournment is for more than 30 days or, if after an adjournment, a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each stockholder entitled to vote at the meeting.

                       Section 6.   Vote Required .  Except as otherwise provided by law or by the Certificate of Incorporation:

                                   (a)     Directors shall be elected by a plurality in voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at a meeting of the stockholders and entitled to vote in the election of directors; and

                                   (b)     Whenever any corporate action other than the election of directors is to be taken, it shall be authorized by a majority in voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at a meeting of stockholders and entitled to vote on the subject matter.

                       Section 7.   Manner of Voting; Proxies . (a) At each meeting of stockholders, each stockholder having the right to vote shall be entitled to vote in person or by proxy. Each stockholder shall be entitled to vote each share of stock having voting power and registered in such stockholder's name on the books of the Corporation on the record date fixed for determination of stockholders entitled to vote at such meeting.

                                   (b)     Each person entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders or to express consent or dissent to corporate action in writing without a meeting may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder by proxy, but no such proxy shall be voted or acted upon after three years from its date, unless the proxy provides for a longer period. A proxy shall be irrevocable if it states that it is irrevocable and if, and only so long as, it is coupled with an interest sufficient in law to support an irrevocable power. Proxies need not be filed with the Secretary of the Corporation until the meeting is called to order, but shall be filed before being voted. Without limiting the manner in which a stockholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder as proxy, the following shall constitute valid means by which a stockholder may grant such authority:

   

            (1)     A stockholder may execute a writing authorizing another person or persons to act for such stockholder as proxy. Execution may be accomplished by the stockholder or the stockholder's authorized officer, director, employee, or agent signing such writing or causing such person's signature to be affixed to such writing by any reasonable means including, but not limited to, by facsimile signature; and

  

- 3 -
______________________________________________________________________________

 

            (2)     A stockholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder as proxy by transmitting or authorizing the transmission of a telegram, cablegram, or other means of electronic transmission to the person or persons who will be the holder of the proxy or to an agent of the proxyholder(s) duly authorized by such proxyholder(s) to receive such transmission; provided , however , that any such telegram, cablegram, or other means of electronic transmission must either set forth or be submitted with information from which it can be determined that the telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission was authorized by the stockholder. If it is determined that any such telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission is valid, the inspectors or, if there are no inspectors, such other persons making that determination, shall specify the information upon which they relied.

 

Any copy, facsimile telecommunication, or other reliable reproduction of a writing or electronic transmission authorizing a person or persons to act as proxy for a stockholder may be substituted or used in lieu of the original writing or electronic transmission for any and all purposes for which the original writing or electronic transmission could be used; provided , however , that such copy, facsimile telecommunication, or other reproduction shall be a complete reproduction of the entire original writing or electronic transmission.

                       Section 8.   Remote Communication .  For the purposes of these Bylaws, if authorized by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion, and subject to such guidelines and procedures as the Board of Directors may adopt, stockholders and proxyholders may, by means of remote communication:

                       (A)     participate in a meeting of stockholders; and

                       (B)     be deemed present in person and vote at a meeting of stockholders whether such meeting is to be held at a designated place or solely by means of remote communication, provided that (i) the Corporation shall implement reasonable measures to verify that each person deemed present and permitted to vote at the meeting by means of remote communication is a stockholder or proxyholder, (ii) the Corporation shall implement reasonable measures to provide such stockholders and proxyholders a reasonable opportunity to participate in the meeting and to vote on matters submitted to the stockholders, including an opportunity to read or hear the proceedings of the meeting substantially concurrently with such proceedings, and (iii) if any stockholder or proxyholder votes or takes other action at the meeting by means of remote communication, a record of such vote or other action shall be maintained by the corporation.

                       Section 9.   Stockholder Action Without a Meeting .  (a) Except as otherwise provided by law or by the Certificate of Incorporation, any action required to be taken at any meeting of stockholders of the Corporation, or any action that may be taken at any annual or special meeting of such stockholders, may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice, and without  a  vote, if a consent or  consents in  writing  setting  forth  the action  so  taken,  shall  be

- 4 -
______________________________________________________________________________

signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted and shall be delivered to the Corporation by delivery to its registered office in the State of New Jersey, its principal place of business, or an officer or agent of the Corporation having custody of the book or books in which meetings of stockholders are recorded; provided , however , that delivery made to the Corporation's registered office in the State of New Jersey shall be by hand or by certified mail, return receipt requested. Prompt notice of the taking of the corporate action without a meeting by less than unanimous written consent shall be given to those stockholders who have not consented in writing and who, if the action had been taken at a meeting, would have been entitled to notice of the meeting if the record date for such meeting had been the date that written consents signed by a sufficient number of the holders to take the action were delivered to the Corporation.

                                   (b)     A telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission consenting to an action to be taken and transmitted by a stockholder or proxyholder, or by a person or persons authorized to act for a stockholder or proxyholder, shall be deemed to be written, signed, and dated for the purposes of these Bylaws, provided that any such telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission sets forth or is delivered with information from which the Corporation can determine (A) that the telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission was transmitted by the stockholder or proxyholder or by a person or persons authorized to act for the stockholder or proxyholder and (B) the date on which such stockholder or proxyholder or authorized person or persons transmitted such telegram, cablegram, or electronic transmission. Any consent by means of telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission shall be deemed to have been signed on the date on which such telegram, cablegram, or electronic transmission was transmitted. No consent given by telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission shall be deemed to have been delivered until such consent is reproduced in paper form and until such paper form shall be delivered to the Corporation by delivery to its registered office in the State of New Jersey, its principal place of business or an officer or agent of the Corporation having custody of the book in which proceedings of meetings of stockholders are recorded. Delivery made to a Corporation's registered office shall be made by hand or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. Notwithstanding the foregoing limitations on delivery, consents given by telegram, cablegram, or other electronic transmission may be otherwise delivered to the principal place of business of the Corporation or to an officer or agent of the Corporation having custody of the book in which proceedings of meetings of stockholders are recorded if, to the extent, and in the manner provided by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

                                   (c)     Any copy, facsimile, or other reliable reproduction of a consent in writing (or reproduction in paper form of a consent by telegram, cablegram, or electronic transmission) may be substituted or used in lieu of the original writing (or original reproduction in paper form of a consent by telegram, cablegram, or electronic transmission) for any and all purposes for which the original consent could be used, provided that such copy, facsimile, or other reproduction shall be a complete reproduction of the entire original writing (or original reproduction in paper form of a consent by telegram, cablegram, or electronic transmission).

                                   (d)     In order to determine the stockholders entitled to consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting, the Board of Directors may fix a record date. Such record date  shall not precede the  date upon which  the resolution  fixing the  record date is

- 5 -
______________________________________________________________________________

adopted by the Board of Directors, and shall not be more than ten days after the date upon which the resolution fixing the record date is adopted by the Board of Directions. If no record date has been fixed by the Board of Directors, the record date for determining stockholders entitled to consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting, when no prior action of the Board of Directors is required by applicable law, the Certificate of Incorporation, or these Bylaws, shall be the first date on which a signed written consent setting forth the action taken or proposed to be taken is delivered to the Corporation in the manner set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of this Section 9. If no record date has been fixed by the Board of Directors and prior action of the Board of Directors is required by applicable law, the Certificate of Incorporation, or these Bylaws, the record date for determining stockholders entitled to consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting shall be the close of business on the day on which the Board of Directors adopts the resolution taking such prior action.

ARTICLE III

DIRECTORS

                       Section 1.   Number .  The number of directors that shall constitute the whole Board of Directors initially shall be one (1), and thereafter shall be such number of directors to be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by the Board of Directors.

                       Section 2.   Powers .  The Board of Directors shall exercise all of the powers of the Corporation except such as are by applicable law, by the Certificate of Incorporation of this Corporation, or by these Bylaws conferred upon or reserved to the stockholders of any class or classes or series thereof.

                       Section 3.   Resignations and Removal .  (a) Any director may resign at any time by giving written notice in writing or by electronic transmission to the Board of Directors or the Secretary; provided , however , that if such notice is given by electronic transmission, such electronic transmission must either set forth or be submitted with information from which it can be determined that the electronic transmission was authorized by the director. Such resignation shall take effect at the date of receipt of such notice or at any later time specified therein. Acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective.

                                   (b)     Except as otherwise may be provided in the Certificate of Incorporation, any director or the entire Board of Directors may be removed with or without cause, by the holders of capital stock having a majority in voting power of the shares entitled to vote in the election of directors.

                       Section 4.   Regular Meetings .  Regular meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held on such dates and at such times and places, within or without the State of Delaware, as shall from time to time be determined by the Board of Directors, such determination to constitute the only notice of such regular meetings to which any director shall be entitled. In the absence of any such determination, such meetings shall  be held, upon notice to  each director in accordance

- 6 -
______________________________________________________________________________

with Section 7 of this Article III, at such times and places, within or without the State of Delaware, as shall be designated by the Chairman of the Board.

                       Section 5.   Special Meetings .  Special meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at the call of the Chairman of the Board at such times and places, within or without the State of Delaware, as he or she shall designate, upon notice to each director in accordance with Section 7 of this Article III. Special meetings shall be called by the Secretary on like notice at the written request of a majority of the directors then in office.

                       Section 6.   Notice .  Notice of any regular (if required) or special meeting of the Board of Directors may be given verbally in person, verbally by telephone (including by leaving verbal notice on a message or recording device), or in writing. If in writing, notice shall be delivered personally, by mail, by facsimile transmission (directed to the facsimile transmission number for which the director has consented to receive notice), by telegram, by electronic mail (directed to such electronic mail address to which the director has consented to receive notice), or by other form of electronic transmission pursuant to which the director has consented to receive notice. If notice is given verbally in person, verbally by telephone, or in writing by personal delivery, by facsimile transmission, by telegram, by electronic mail, or by other form of electronic transmission pursuant to which the director has consented to receive notice, then such notice shall be given on not less than twenty-four hours' notice to each director. If written notice is delivered by mail, then it shall be given on not less than three (3) calendar days' notice to each director.

                       Section 7.   Waiver of Notice .  Notice of any meeting of the Board of Directors, or any committee thereof, need not be given to any member if waived by him or her in writing or by electronic transmission, whether before or after such meeting is held, or if he or she shall sign the minutes or attend the meeting, except that if such director attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting at the beginning of the meeting to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened, then such director shall not be deemed to have waived notice of such meeting. If waiver of notice is given by electronic transmission, such electronic transmission must either set forth or be submitted with information from which it can be determined that the electronic transmission was authorized by the director.

                       Section 8.   Quorum and Powers of a Majority .  At all meetings of the Board of Directors and of each committee thereof, a majority of the members of the Board of Directors or of such committee shall be necessary and sufficient to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The act of a majority of the members present at any meeting of the Board of Directors or a committee thereof at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the Board of Directors or such committee, unless by express provision of law, of the Certificate of Incorporation, or of these Bylaws, a different vote is required, in which case such express provision shall govern and control. In the absence of a quorum, a majority of the members present at any meeting may, without notice other than announcement at the meeting, adjourn such meeting from time to time until a quorum is present.

                       Section 9.   Manner of Acting .  (a)  Members of the Board of Directors, or any committee thereof, may participate in any meeting of the Board of Directors or such committee by  means of  conference telephone or  other communications  equipment by means  of which all

- 7 -
______________________________________________________________________________

persons participating therein can hear each other, and participation in a meeting by such means shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.

                                   (b)     Any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof may be taken without a meeting if all members of the Board of Directors or such committee, as the case may be, consent thereto in writing or by electronic transmission, and the writing or writings or electronic transmission or transmissions are filed with the minutes of proceedings of the Board of Directors or such committee; provided however , that such electronic transmission or transmissions must either set forth or be submitted with information from which it can be determined that the electronic transmission or transmissions were authorized by the director. Such filing shall be in paper form if the minutes are maintained in paper form and shall be in electronic form if the minutes are maintained in electronic form.

                       Section 10.   Committees .  The Board of Directors may designate one or more committees, each committee to consist of one or more directors, which to the extent provided in said resolution or resolutions shall have and may exercise the powers and authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation (including the power and authority to designate other committees of the Board of Directors); provided, however, that no such committee shall have the power or authority in reference to the following matters: (i) approving or adopting, or recommending to the stockholders, any action or matter expressly required by the Business Corporation Act of the State of New Jersey to be submitted to stockholders for approval or (ii) adopting, amending, or repealing any Bylaw of the Corporation. The Board of Directors may designate one or more directors as alternate members of any committee to replace any absent or disqualified member of the committee. In the absence or disqualification of a member of a committee, the member or members present at any meeting of such committee and not disqualified from voting, whether or not such member or members constitute a quorum, may unanimously appoint another member of the Board of Directors to act at the meeting in place of such absent or disqualified director.

                       Section 11.   Committee Procedure, Limitations of Committee Powers .  (a)  Except as otherwise provided by these Bylaws, each committee shall adopt its own rules governing the time, place, and method of holding its meetings and the conduct of its proceedings and shall meet as provided by such rules or by resolution of the Board of Directors. Unless otherwise provided by these Bylaws or any such rules or resolutions, notice of the time and place of each meeting of a committee shall be given to each member of such committee as provided in Section 6 of this Article III with respect to notices of meetings of the Board of Directors.

                                   (b)     Each committee shall keep regular minutes of its proceedings and report the same to the Board of Directors when required.

                                   (c)     Any member of any committee may be removed from such committee either with or without cause, at any time, by the Board of Directors at any meeting thereof. Any vacancy in any committee shall be filled by the Board of Directors in the manner prescribed by the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws for the original appointment of the members of such committee.

- 8 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                       Section 12.   Vacancies and Newly-Created Directorships .  Unless otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation or in these Bylaws, vacancies and newly-created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. Unless otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, when one or more directors shall resign from the Board, effective at a future date, a majority of directors then in office, including those who have resigned, shall have the power to fill such vacancy or vacancies, the vote thereon to take effect when such resignation or resignations shall become effective.

                       Section 13.   Compensation .  (a)   The Board of Directors, by a resolution or resolutions, may fix, and from time to time change, the compensation of Directors.

                                   (b)     Each director shall be entitled to reimbursement from the Corporation for his or her reasonable expenses incurred with respect to duties as a member of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof.

                                   (c)     Nothing contained in these Bylaws shall be construed to preclude any director from serving the Corporation in any other capacity and from receiving compensation from the Corporation for service rendered to it in such other capacity.

ARTICLE IV

OFFICERS

                       Section 1.   Number .  (a)  The officers of the Corporation shall include a President, one or more Vice Presidents (including one or more Executive Vice Presidents and one or more Senior Vice Presidents if deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors), a Secretary, and a Treasurer. The Board of Directors also may elect such other officers as the Board of Directors may from time to time deem appropriate or necessary.

                                   (b)  The Chief Executive Officer shall have the power to appoint one or more employees of the Corporation as a regional president, vice president or other regional officer designation and fix the duties of such appointees. However, no such regional president, vice president or other regional officer designation shall be considered an officer of the Corporation.

                       Section 2.   Election of Officers, Term, and Qualifications .  The officers of the Corporation shall be elected from time to time by the Board of Directors and, except as may otherwise be expressly provided in a contract of employment duly authorized by the Board of Directors, shall hold office at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. Except for the Chairman of the Board and the Vice Chairman of the Board, none of the officers of the Corporation needs to be a director of the Corporation. Any two or more offices may be held by the same person to the extent permitted by the Business Corporation Act of the State of New Jersey.

- 9 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                       Section 3.   Removal .  Any officer elected by the Board of Directors may be removed, either with or without cause, by the Board of Directors at any meeting thereof, or to the extent delegated to the Chairman of the Board, by the Chairman of the Board.

                       Section 4.   Resignations .  Any officer of the Corporation may resign at any time by giving notice in writing or by electronic transmission to the Board of Directors or to the Chairman of the Board; provided , however , that if such notice is given by electronic transmission, such electronic transmission must either set forth or be submitted with information from which it can be determined that the electronic transmission was authorized by the officer. Such resignation shall take effect at the date of the receipt of such notice or at any later time specified therein and, unless otherwise specified therein, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective.

                       Section 5.   Salaries .  The salaries of all officers of the Corporation shall be fixed by the Board of Directors from time to time, and no officer shall be prevented from receiving such salary by reason of the fact that he or she also is a director of the Corporation.

                       Section 6.   Chief Executive Officer .  The Chief Executive Officer shall have, subject to the supervision, direction and control of the Board of Directors, the general powers and duties of supervision, direction and management of affairs and business of the Corporation usually vested in the chief executive officer of a corporation, including, without limitation, all powers necessary to direct and control the organizational reporting relationships within the Corporation. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be delegated to him or her by the Board of Directors. If at any time the offices of the Chairman of the Board and the Vice Chairman of the Board shall not be filled, or in the event of the temporary absence or disability of the Chairman of the Board and the Vice Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer shall have the powers and duties of the Chairman of the Board.

                       Section 7.   The President .  The President shall serve as the chief operating officer of the Corporation. The President shall have, subject to the supervision, direction and control of the Board of Directors, the general powers and duties customarily and usually associated with the office of the President and shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be delegated to him or her from time to time by the Board of Directors or the Chief Executive Officer.

                       Section 8.   The Vice Presidents .  Each Vice President if any shall be elected, shall have such powers and perform such duties as may from time to time be assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors or the President.

                       Section 9.   The Secretary and Assistant Secretaries .  (a)  The Secretary shall attend meetings of the Board of Directors and meetings of the stockholders and record all votes and minutes of all such proceedings in a book or books kept for such purpose. The Secretary shall have  all  such  further  powers  and  duties as  are customarily  and  usually  associated  with  the

- 10 -
______________________________________________________________________________

position of Secretary or as may from time to time be assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors or the President.

                                   (b)     Each Assistant Secretary shall have such powers and perform such duties as may from time to time be assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors, the President, or the Secretary. In the case of absence or disability of the Secretary, the Assistant Secretary designated by the President (or, in the absence of such designation, by the Secretary) shall perform the duties and exercise the powers of the Secretary.

                       Section 10.   The Treasurer and Assistant Treasurers .  (a)  The Treasurer shall have custody of the Corporation's funds and securities, shall be responsible for maintaining the Corporation's accounting records and statements, shall keep full and accurate accounts of receipts and disbursements in books belonging to the Corporation, and shall deposit or cause to be deposited moneys or other valuable effects in the name and to the credit of the Corporation in such depositories as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The Treasurer also shall maintain adequate records of all assets, liabilities, and transactions of the Corporation and shall assure that adequate audits thereof are currently and regularly made. The Treasurer shall have all such further powers and duties as are customarily and usually associated with the position of Treasurer or as may from time to time be assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors or the President.

                                   (b)     Each Assistant Treasurer shall have such powers and perform such duties as may from time to time be assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors or the Treasurer. In the case of absence or disability of the Treasurer, the Assistant Treasurer designated by the President (or, in the absence of such designation, by the Treasurer) shall perform the duties and exercise the powers of the Treasurer.

ARTICLE V

STOCK

                       Section 1.   Certificates .  The shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be represented by certificates, unless the Board of Directors provides by resolution or resolutions that some or all of the shares of any class or classes, or series thereof, of the Corporation's capital stock shall be uncertificated. Notwithstanding the adoption of any such resolution or resolutions by the Board of Directors providing for uncertificated shares, to the extent required by law, every holder of capital stock of the Corporation represented by certificates, and upon request, every holder of uncertificated shares, shall be entitled to a certificate representing such shares. Certificates for shares of stock of the Corporation shall be issued under the seal of the Corporation, or a facsimile thereof, and shall be numbered and shall be entered in the books of the Corporation as they are issued. Each certificate shall bear a serial number, shall exhibit the holder's name and the number of shares evidenced thereby, and shall be signed by the Chairman of the Board or a Vice Chairman, if any, or the President or any Vice President, and by the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary or the Treasurer or an Assistant Treasurer. Any or all of the signatures  on the certificate may  be a facsimile. If any  officer, transfer  agent, or  registrar who

- 11 -
______________________________________________________________________________

has signed or whose facsimile signature has been placed upon a certificate shall have ceased to be such officer, transfer agent, or registrar before such certificate is issued, the certificate may be issued by the Corporation with the same effect as if such person or entity were such officer, transfer agent, or registrar at the date of issue.

                       Section 2.   Transfers .  Transfers of stock of the Corporation shall be made on the books of the Corporation only upon surrender to the Corporation of a certificate (if any) for the shares duly endorsed or accompanied by proper evidence of succession, assignment, or authority to transfer; provided , however , that such succession, assignment, or transfer is not prohibited by the Certificate of Incorporation, these Bylaws, applicable law, or contract. Thereupon, the Corporation shall issue a new certificate (if requested) to the person entitled thereto, cancel the old certificate (if any), and record the transaction upon its books.

                       Section 3.   Lost, Stolen, or Destroyed Certificates .  Any person claiming a certificate of stock to be lost, stolen, or destroyed shall make an affidavit or an affirmation of that fact, and shall give the Corporation a bond of indemnity in satisfactory form and with one or more satisfactory sureties, whereupon a new certificate (if requested) may be issued of the same tenor and for the same number of shares as the one alleged to be lost, stolen, or destroyed.

                       Section 4.   Registered Stockholders .  The names and addresses of the holders of record of the shares of each class and series of the Corporation's capital stock, together with the number of shares of each class and series held by each record holder and the date of issue of such shares, shall be entered on the books of the Corporation. The Corporation shall be entitled to recognize the exclusive right of a person registered on its books as the owner of shares of capital stock of the Corporation as the person entitled to exercise the rights of a stockholder, including, without limitation, the right to vote in person or by proxy at any meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation. The Corporation shall not be bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to or interest in any such shares on the part of any other person, whether or not it shall have express or other notice thereof, except as otherwise expressly provided by the Business Corporation Act of the State of New Jersey.

                       Section 5.   Additional Powers of the Board .  (a)  In addition to those powers set forth in Section 2 of Article III, the Board of Directors shall have power and authority to make all such rules and regulations as it shall deem expedient concerning the issue, transfer, and registration of certificates for shares of stock of the Corporation, including the use of uncertificated shares of stock, subject to the provisions of the Business Corporation Act of the State of New Jersey, the Certificate of Incorporation, and these Bylaws.

                                   (b)     The Board of Directors may appoint and remove transfer agents and registrars of transfers, and may require all stock certificates to bear the signature of any such transfer agent and/or any such registrar of transfers.

- 12 -
______________________________________________________________________________

ARTICLE VI

INDEMNIFICATION

                       Section 1.   Indemnification .  (a) The Corporation shall indemnify, to the full extent that it shall have power under applicable law to do so and in a manner permitted by such law, any person made or threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative (hereinafter, a "Proceeding"), by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of Corporation as a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, including service with respect to an employee benefit plan (collectively, "Another Enterprise").

                                   (b)     The Corporation may indemnify, to the full extent that it shall have power under applicable law to do so and in a manner permitted by such law, any person made or threatened to be made a party to any Proceeding, by reason of the fact that such person is or was an employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as an employee or agent of Another Enterprise.

                       Section 2.   Advancement of Expenses .  (a) With respect to any person made or threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed Proceeding, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the Corporation or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director or officer of Another Enterprise, the Corporation shall pay the expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by such person in defending any such Proceeding in advance of its final disposition (hereinafter an "advancement of expenses"); provided , however , that any advancement of expenses shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking (hereinafter an "undertaking") by such person to repay all amounts advanced if it shall ultimately be determined by final judicial decision from which there is no further right to appeal (hereinafter a "Final Adjudication") that such person is not entitled to be indemnified for such expenses under this Article VI or otherwise. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, with respect to a Proceeding (or part thereof) initiated against the Corporation by a director or officer of the Corporation (or by a person serving at the request of the Corporation as a director or officer of Another Enterprise), the Corporation shall not be required to indemnify or to pay the expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by such person in prosecuting such Proceeding (or part thereof) or in defending any counterclaim, cross-claim, affirmative defense, or like claim of the Corporation in connection with such Proceeding (or part thereof) in advance of the final disposition of such Proceeding (or part thereof) unless such Proceeding was authorized by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

                                   (b)     With respect to any person made or threatened to be made a party to any Proceeding, by reason of the fact that such person is or was an employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as an employee or agent of Another Enterprise, the Corporation may, in its discretion and upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the Corporation deems appropriate, pay the expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by such person in defending any such Proceeding in advance of its final disposition.

- 13 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                       Section 3.   Contract Rights .  With respect to any person made or threatened to be made a party to any Proceeding, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director or officer of Another Enterprise, the rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses conferred in Sections 1(a) and 2(a) of this Article VI shall be contract rights.

                       Section 4.   Claims .  (a)  If (X) a claim under Section 1(a) of this Article VI with respect to any right to indemnification is not paid in full by the Corporation within sixty days after a written demand has been received by the Corporation or (Y) a claim under Section 2(a) of this Article VI with respect to any right to the advancement of expenses is not paid in full by the Corporation within twenty days after a written demand has been received by the Corporation, then the person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification or to an advancement of expenses, as the case may be, may at any time thereafter bring suit against the Corporation to recover the unpaid amount of the claim.

                                   (b)  If successful in whole or in part in any suit brought pursuant to Section 4(a) of this Article VI, or in a suit brought by the Corporation to recover an advancement of expenses (whether pursuant to the terms of an undertaking or otherwise), the person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification or an advancement of expenses hereunder or the person from whom the Corporation sought to recover an advancement of expenses, as the case may be, shall be entitled to be paid by the Corporation the reasonable expenses (including attorneys' fees) of prosecuting or defending such suit.

                                   (c)     In any suit brought by a person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification hereunder (but not a suit brought by a person seeking to enforce a right to an advancement of expenses hereunder), it shall be a defense that the person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification has not met any applicable standard for indemnification under applicable law. With respect to any suit brought by a person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification or right to advancement of expenses hereunder or any suit brought by the Corporation to recover an advancement of expenses (whether pursuant to the terms of an undertaking or otherwise), neither (i) the failure of the Corporation to have made a determination prior to commencement of such suit that indemnification of such person is proper in the circumstances because such person has met the applicable standards of conduct under applicable law, nor (ii) an actual determination by the Corporation that such person has not met such applicable standards of conduct, shall create a presumption that such person has not met the applicable standards of conduct or, in a case brought by such person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification, be a defense to such suit.

                                   (d)     In any suit brought by a person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification or to an advancement of expenses hereunder, or by the Corporation to recover an advancement of expenses (whether pursuant to the terms of an undertaking or otherwise), the burden shall be on the Corporation to prove that the person seeking to enforce a right to indemnification or to an advancement of expenses or the person from whom the Corporation seeks to recover an advancement of expenses is not entitled to be indemnified, or to such an advancement of expenses, under this Article VI or otherwise.

- 14 -
______________________________________________________________________________

                       Section 5.   Non-Exclusive Rights .  The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided in this Article VI shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which any person may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise, both as to action in such person's official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office, and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be such director, officer, employee, or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and administrators of such person.

                       Section 6.   Insurance .  The Corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee, or agent of Another Enterprise against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of such person's status as such, whether or not the Corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such liability under the provisions of this Article VI or otherwise.

ARTICLE VII

MISCELLANEOUS

                       Section 1.   Books and Records .  (a)   Any books or records maintained by the Corporation in the regular course of its business, including its stock ledger, books of account, and minute books, may be kept on, or by means of, or be in the form of, any information storage device or method; provided , however , that the books and records so kept can be converted into clearly legible paper form within a reasonable time. The Corporation shall so convert any books or records so kept upon the request of any person entitled to inspect such records pursuant to the Certificate of Incorporation, these Bylaws, or the provisions of the Business Corporation Act of the State of New Jersey.

                                   (b)     It shall be the duty of the Secretary or other officer of the Corporation who shall have charge of the stock ledger to prepare and make, at least ten days before every meeting of the stockholders, a complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote thereat, arranged in alphabetical order, and showing the address of each stockholder and the number of shares registered in the stockholder's name. Nothing contained in this subsection (b) shall require the Corporation to include electronic mail addresses or other electronic contact information on such list. Such list shall be open to the examination of any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting for a period of at least 10 days prior to the meeting: (i) on a reasonably accessible electronic network, provided that the information required to gain access to such list is provided with the notice of the meeting, or (ii) during ordinary business hours, at the principal place of business of the Corporation. In the event that the Corporation determines to make the list available on an electronic network, the Corporation may take reasonable steps to ensure that such information is available only to stockholders of the Corporation. If the meeting is to be held at a place, then the list shall be produced and kept at the time and place of the meeting during the whole time thereof, and may be inspected by any stockholder who is present. If the meeting is to be held solely by means of remote communication, then the list shall also be open to the examination of any stockholder during the whole time of the meeting on a reasonably

- 15 -
______________________________________________________________________________

accessible network, and the information required to access such list shall be provided with the notice of the meeting. The stock ledger shall be the only evidence of the identity of the stockholders entitled to examine such list.

                                   (c)     Except to the extent otherwise required by law, or by the Certificate of Incorporation, or by these Bylaws, the Board of Directors shall determine from time to time whether and, if allowed, when and under what conditions and regulations the stock ledger, books, records, and accounts of the Corporation, or any of them, shall be open to inspection by the stockholders and the stockholders' rights, if any, in respect thereof. The stock ledger shall be the only evidence of the identity of the stockholders entitled to examine the stock ledger, the books, records, or accounts of the Corporation.

                       Section 2.   Voting Shares in Other Business Entities .  The President or any other officer of the Corporation designated by the Board of Directors may vote any and all shares of stock or other equity interest held by the Corporation in any other corporation or other business entity, and may exercise on behalf of the Corporation any and all rights and powers incident to the ownership of such stock or other equity interest.

                       Section 3.   Record Date for Distributions and Other Actions .  In order that the Corporation may determine the stockholders entitled to receive payment of any dividend or other distribution, or allotment of any rights, or the stockholders entitled to exercise any rights in respect of any change, conversion, or exchange of capital stock, or for the purpose of any other lawful action, except as may otherwise be provided in these Bylaws, the Board of Directors may fix a record date. Such record date shall not precede the date upon which the resolution fixing such record date is adopted, and shall not be more than sixty days prior to such action. If no record date is fixed, the record date for determining stockholders for any such purpose shall be the close of business on the day on which the Board of Directors adopts the resolution relating thereto.

                       Section 4.   Fiscal Year .  The fiscal year of the Corporation shall be such fiscal year as the Board of Directors from time to time by resolution shall determine.

                       Section 5.   Electronic Transmission .  For purposes of these Bylaws, "electronic transmission" means any form of communication, not directly involving the physical transmission of paper, that creates a record that may be retained, retrieved, and reviewed by a recipient thereof, and that may be directly reproduced in paper form by such a recipient through an automated process.

                       Section 6.   Amendment .  These Bylaws may be altered, amended, or repealed at any meeting of the Board of Directors, or at any meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation.

- 16 -
______________________________________________________________________________

Execution Version

 

$1,200,000,000

CREDIT AGREEMENT

AMONG

PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC.,
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY,
DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
and
ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY,
as Borrowers,

Wachovia Bank, National Association,
as Administrative Agent,

CITICORP USA, INC.,
as Syndication Agent,

and

THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND, PLC,
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
and
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as Documentation Agents

 

WACHOVIA CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC,
and
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.,
as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners

Dated as of May 5, 2005

______________________________________________________________________________

ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS

1

 

1.1

Definitions

1

 

1.2

Interpretations

15

 

1.3

Accounting

15

ARTICLE II THE CREDITS

16

 

2.1

Commitment

16

 

2.2

Increase in Commitments

16

 

2.3

Required Payments; Termination

17

 

2.4

Extension of Facility Termination Date

17

 

2.5

Ratable Loans

18

 

2.6

Types of Advances

18

 

2.7

Facility Fee; Utilization Fee; Reductions in Aggregate Commitment

18

 

2.8

Minimum Amount of Each Advance

19

 

2.9

Prepayments

19

 

2.10

Method of Selecting Types and Interest Periods for New Advances

20

 

2.11

Conversion and Continuation of Outstanding Advances

20

 

2.12

Changes in Interest Rate, etc.

21

 

2.13

Rates Applicable After Default

21

 

2.14

Method of Payment

21

 

2.15

Noteless Agreement; Evidence of Indebtedness

22

 

2.16

Telephonic Notices

22

 

2.17

Interest Payment Dates; Interest and Fee Basis

22

 

2.18

Notification of Advances, Interest Rates, Prepayments and Commitment Reductions

23

 

2.18

Lending Installations

23

 

2.20

Non-Receipt of Funds by the Agent

23

 

2.21

Letters of Credit

24

ARTICLE III YIELD PROTECTION; TAXES

27

 

3.1

Yield Protection

27

 

3.2

Changes in Capital Adequacy Regulations

28

 

3.3

Availability of Types of Advances

29

 

3.4

Funding Indemnification

29

 

3.5

Taxes

29

 

3.6

Mitigation of Circumstances; Lender Statements; Survival of Indemnity

31

 

3.7

Replacement of Lender

31

ARTICLE IV CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

32

 

4.1

Initial Credit Extension

32

 

4.2

Each Credit Extension

33

ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

33

 

5.1

Existence and Standing

33

 

5.2

Authorization and Validity

34

 

5.3

No Conflict; Government Consent

34

 

5.4

Financial Statements

34

 

5.5

No Material Adverse Change

35

 

5.6

Taxes

35

i
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

5.7

Litigation and Contingent Obligations

35

 

5.8

Significant Subsidiaries

35

 

5.9

ERISA

35

 

5.10

Accuracy of Information

35

 

5.11

Regulation U

35

 

5.12

Material Agreements

36

 

5.13

Compliance With Laws

36

 

5.14

Plan Assets; Prohibited Transactions

36

 

5.15

Environmental Matters

36

 

5.16

Investment Company Act

36

 

5.17

Public Utility Holding Company Act

36

 

5.18

Insurance

36

 

5.19

No Default

36

 

5.20

Ownership of Properties

36

 

5.21

OFAC

37

ARTICLE VI COVENANTS

37

 

6.1

Financial Reporting

37

 

6.2

Use of Proceeds

39

 

6.3

Notice of Default

39

 

6.4

Conduct of Business

39

 

6.5

Taxes

39

 

6.6

Insurance

39

 

6.7

Compliance with Laws

40

 

6.8

Maintenance of Properties

40

 

6.9

Inspection

40

 

6.10

Merger

40

 

6.11

Sales of Assets

40

 

6.12

Liens

41

 

6.13

Leverage Ratio

43

ARTICLE VII DEFAULTS

43

 

7.1

Representation or Warranty

43

 

7.2

Nonpayment

44

 

7.3

Certain Covenant Breaches

44

 

7.4

Other Breaches

44

 

7.5

Cross Default

44

 

7.6

Voluntary Bankruptcy, etc.

44

 

7.7

Involuntary Bankruptcy, etc.

44

 

7.8

Seizure of Property, etc.

45

 

7.9

Judgments

45

 

7.10

ERISA

45

 

7.11

Unenforceability of Loan Documents

45

 

7.12

Change in Control

45

ARTICLE VIII ACCELERATION, WAIVERS, AMENDMENTS AND REMEDIES

46

 

8.1

Acceleration

46

 

8.2

Amendments

46

ii
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

8.3

Preservation of Rights

47

ARTICLE IX GENERAL PROVISIONS

47

 

9.1

Survival of Representations

47

 

9.2

Governmental Regulation

47

 

9.3

Headings

47

 

9.4

Entire Agreement

47

 

9.5

Several Obligations; Benefits of this Agreement

47

 

9.6

Expenses; Indemnification

48

 

9.7

Numbers of Documents

48

 

9.8

Disclosure

48

 

9.9

Severability of Provisions

48

 

9.10

Nonliability of Lenders

49

 

9.11

Limited Disclosure

49

 

9.12

Nonreliance

50

 

9.13

Termination of Existing Credit Facilities

50

 

9.14

UA PATRIOT ACT NOTIFICATION

50

ARTICLE X THE AGENT

50

 

10.1

Appointment; Nature of Relationship

50

 

10.2

Powers

51

 

10.3

General Immunity

51

 

10.4

No Responsibility for Loans Recitals etc.

51

 

10.5

Action on Instructions of Lenders

51

 

10.6

Employment of Agents and Counsel

52

 

10.7

Reliance on Documents; Counsel

52

 

10.8

Agent's Reimbursement and Indemnification

52

 

10.9

Notice of Default

52

 

10.10

Rights as a Lender

52

 

10.11

Lender Credit Decision

53

 

10.12

Successor Agent

53

 

10.13

Agent's Fee

54

 

10.14

Delegation to Affiliates

54

 

10.15

Other Agents

54

ARTICLE XI SETOFF; RATABLE PAYMENTS

54

 

11.1

Setoff

54

 

11.2

Ratable Payments

54

ARTICLE XII BENEFIT OF AGREEMENT; ASSIGNMENTS; PARTICIPATIONS

55

 

12.1

Successors and Assigns

55

 

12.2

Participations

55

 

12.3

Assignments

56

 

12.4

Dissemination of Information

57

 

12.5

Grant of Funding Option to SPC

57

 

12.6

Tax Treatment

58

ARTICLE XIII NOTICES

58

 

13.1

Notices

58

iii
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

13.2

Notices to and by Subsidiary Borrowers

59

ARTICLE XIV COUNTERPARTS

59

ARTICLE XV CHOICE OF LAW; CONSENT TO JURISDICTION; WAIVER OF JURY
          TRIAL

59

 

15.1

CHOICE OF LAW

59

 

15.2

CONSENT TO JURISDICTION

5609

 

15.3

WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL

 

iv
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT A

COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

EXHIBIT B

ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT C

NOTE

EXHIBIT D

FORM OF LEGAL OPINIONS

EXHIBIT E

FORM OF INCREASE NOTICE

EXHIBIT F

FORM OF EXTENSION NOTICE

SCHEDULES

SCHEDULE 1

PRICING SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE 2

COMMITMENTS AND PRO RATA SHARES

SCHEDULE 3

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE 4

LIENS

SCHEDULE 5

NONRECOURSE INDEBTEDNESS

SCHEDULE 6

PERMITTED ACE ASSET SALES

SCHEDULE 7

REQUIRED APPROVALS

SCHEDULE 8

EXISTING LETTERS OF CREDIT

i
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

CREDIT AGREEMENT

          This CREDIT AGREEMENT, dated as of May 5, 2005, is among Pepco Holdings, Inc. (" PHI "), Potomac Electric Power Company (" PEPCO "), Delmarva Power & Light Company (" DPL "), Atlantic City Electric Company (" ACE " and, together with PHI, PEPCO and DPL, each a " Borrower " and collectively the " Borrowers "), various financial institutions (together with their respective successors and assigns and any financial institution that becomes party hereto pursuant to Sections 2.2 or 2.4 hereof, each a " Lender " and collectively the " Lenders "), Citicorp USA, Inc., as Syndication Agent, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as administrative agent.

          The parties hereto agree as follows:

ARTICLE I

DEFINITIONS

          1.1.      Definitions . As used in this Agreement:

          " ACE " is defined in the preamble .

          " ACE Sublimit " means, at any time, the lesser of (a) $300,000,000, as such amount is (i) increased from time to time pursuant to Section 2.2 or (ii) reduced from time to time pursuant to Section 2.7 and (b) the maximum amount of short-term debt that ACE is authorized to have outstanding by Applicable Governmental Authorities minus any other applicable short-term debt of ACE.

          " Administrative Questionnaire " means an administrative questionnaire, substantially in the form supplied by the Agent, completed by a Lender and furnished to the Agent in connection with this Agreement.

          " Advance " means a borrowing hereunder (i) made by the Lenders on the same Borrowing Date or (ii) converted or continued by the Lenders on the same date of conversion or continuation, consisting, in either case, of the aggregate amount of the several Loans of the same Type made to the same Borrower and, in the case of Eurodollar Loans, for the same Interest Period.

          " Affected Lender " is defined in Section 3.7 .

          " Affiliate " of any Person means any other Person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with such Person. A Person shall be deemed to control another Person if the controlling Person owns 10% or more of any class of voting securities (or other ownership interests) of the controlled Person or possesses, directly or indirectly, the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of the controlled Person, whether through ownership of stock, by contract or otherwise. For purposes of Section 5.21 , no person shall be an "Affiliate" of PHI solely by reason of owning less than a majority of any class of voting securities of PHI.


________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          " Agent " means Wachovia in its capacity as contractual representative of the Lenders pursuant to Article X , and not in its individual capacity as a Lender, and any successor Agent appointed pursuant to Article X .

          " Aggregate Commitment " means the aggregate of the Commitments of all the Lenders, (a) as increased from time to time pursuant to Section 2.2 or (b) as reduced from time to time pursuant to the terms hereof.

          " Agreement " means this Credit Agreement as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time.

          " Agreement Accounting Principles " means generally accepted accounting principles as in effect from time to time, applied, with respect to each Borrower, in a manner consistent with that used in preparing such Borrower's financial statements referred to in Section 5.4 .

          " Alternate Base Rate " means, for any day, a rate of interest per annum equal to the higher of (i) the Prime Rate for such day and (ii) the sum of the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day plus 0.5%.

          " Applicable Governmental Authorities " means, with respect to any Borrower, the SEC and any other federal or state governmental authority that has the power to regulate the amount, terms or conditions of short-term debt of such Borrower.

          " Applicable Margin " means, with respect to Eurodollar Advances to any Borrower at any time, the percentage rate per annum which is applicable at such time with respect to Eurodollar Advances to such Borrower in accordance with the provisions of the Pricing Schedule .

          " Arranger " means each of Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and their respective successors, in each case in its capacity as a Joint Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner.

          " Assignment Agreement " means an agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit B .

          " Authorized Officer " means, with respect to any Borrower, any of the President, any Vice President, the Chief Financial Officer, the Treasurer or any Assistant Treasurer of such Borrower, acting singly.

          " Borrower " is defined in the preamble.

          " Borrowing Date " means a date on which an Advance is made hereunder.

          " Borrowing Notice " is defined in Section 2.10 .

          " Business Day " means (i) with respect to any borrowing, payment or rate selection of Eurodollar Advances, a day (other than a Saturday or Sunday) on which banks generally are open in Charlotte and New York for the conduct of substantially all of their commercial lending activities, interbank wire transfers can be made on the Fedwire system and dealings in United States dollars are carried on in the London  interbank market and (ii) for all other purposes, a day

2
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(other than a Saturday or Sunday) on which banks generally are open in Charlotte for the conduct of substantially all of their commercial lending activities and interbank wire transfers can be made on the Fedwire system.

          " Capitalized Lease " of a Person means any lease of Property by such Person as lessee which would be capitalized on a balance sheet of such Person prepared in accordance with Agreement Accounting Principles.

          " Capitalized Lease Obligations " of a Person means the amount of the obligations of such Person under Capitalized Leases which would be shown as a liability on a balance sheet of such Person prepared in accordance with Agreement Accounting Principles.

          " Change in Control " means an event or series of events by which (a) any Person, or two or more Persons acting in concert, acquire beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of 30% or more (by number of votes) of the outstanding shares of Voting Stock of PHI; or (b) individuals who on the Closing Date were directors of PHI (the " Approved Directors ") shall cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the board of directors of PHI; provided that any individual becoming a member of such board of directors subsequent to such date whose election or nomination for election by PHI's shareholders was approved by a majority of the Approved Directors shall be deemed to be an Approved Director, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents for the election or removal of one or more directors by any Person, or two or more Persons acting in concert, other than a solicitation for the election of one or more directors by or on behalf of the board of directors.

          " Closing Date " means the date on which all conditions precedent to the making of the initial Credit Extension have been satisfied.

          " Code " means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

          " Commitment " means, for each Lender, the obligation of such Lender to make Loans and participate in Letters of Credit, in an aggregate amount not exceeding the amount set forth on Schedule 2 or as set forth in any Assignment Agreement relating to any assignment that has become effective pursuant to Section 12.3.2 , as such amount may be modified from time to time pursuant to the terms hereof.

          " Conectiv " means Conectiv, a Delaware corporation.

          " Consent Date " is defined in Section 2.4 .

          " Consenting Lender " is defined in Section 2.4 .

          " Contingent Obligation " of a Person means any agreement, undertaking or arrangement by which such Person assumes, guarantees, endorses, contingently agrees to purchase or provide funds for the payment of, or otherwise becomes or is contingently liable upon, the obligation or liability of any other Person, or agrees to maintain the net worth or working capital or other financial condition  of any other Person,  or otherwise assures  any creditor of such  other  Person

3
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

against loss, including any comfort letter, operating agreement, take or pay contract, application for a letter of credit or the obligations of any such Person as general partner of a partnership with respect to the liabilities of such partnership; provided that Contingent Obligations shall not include endorsements of instruments for deposit or collection in the ordinary course of business. The amount of any Contingent Obligation shall be deemed equal to the stated or determinable amount of the primary obligation of such other Person or, if such amount is not stated or is indeterminable, the maximum reasonably anticipated liability of such Person in respect thereof.

          " Controlled Group " means all members of a controlled group of corporations or other business entities and all trades or businesses (whether or not incorporated) under common control which, together with any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, are treated as a single employer under Section 414 of the Code.

          " Conversion/Continuation Notice " is defined in Section 2.11 .

          " Credit Extension " means the making of an Advance or the issuance of, or extension of the expiry date for or increase in the amount of, a Letter of Credit.

          " Default " means an event described in Article VII .

          " DPL " is defined in the preamble.

          " DPL Sublimit " means, at any time, the lesser of (a) $300,000,000, as such amount is (i) increased from time to time pursuant to Section 2.2 or (ii) reduced from time to time pursuant to Section 2.7 and (b) the maximum amount of short-term debt that DPL is authorized to have outstanding by Applicable Governmental Authorities minus any other applicable short-term debt of DPL.

          " Environmental Laws " means any and all federal, state, local and foreign statutes, laws, judicial decisions, regulations, ordinances, rules, judgments, orders, decrees, plans, injunctions, permits, concessions, grants, franchises, licenses, agreements and other governmental restrictions relating to (i) the protection of the environment, (ii) the effect of the environment on human health, (iii) emissions, discharges or releases of pollutants, contaminants, hazardous substances or wastes into surface water, ground water or land, or (iv) the manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport or handling of pollutants, contaminants, hazardous substances or wastes or the clean-up or other remediation thereof.

          " ERISA " means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

          " Eurodollar Advance " means an Advance which, except as otherwise provided in Section 2.13 , bears interest at the applicable Eurodollar Rate.

          " Eurodollar Base Rate " means, with respect to a Eurodollar Advance for the relevant Interest Period, the applicable British Bankers' Association Interest Settlement Rate for deposits in U.S. dollars appearing on Reuters Screen FRBD as of 11:00 a.m. (London time) two Business Days prior to the first day of such Interest Period, and having a maturity equal to such Interest Period, provided that (i) if Reuters Screen FRBD is not available to the Agent for any reason, the applicable  Eurodollar Base  Rate for the  relevant Interest  Period shall  instead be the applicable

4
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

British Bankers' Association Interest Settlement Rate for deposits in U.S. dollars as reported by any other generally recognized financial information service as of 11:00 a.m. (London time) two Business Days prior to the first day of such Interest Period, and having a maturity equal to such Interest Period, and (ii) if no such British Bankers' Association Interest Settlement Rate is available to the Agent, the applicable Eurodollar Base Rate for the relevant Interest Period shall instead be the rate determined by the Agent to be the rate at which Wachovia or one of its Affiliate banks offers to place deposits in U.S. dollars with first-class banks in the London interbank market at approximately 11:00 a.m. (London time) two Business Days prior to the first day of such Interest Period, in the approximate amount of Wachovia's relevant Eurodollar Loan and having a maturity equal to such Interest Period.

          " Eurodollar Loan " means a Loan which, except as otherwise provided in Section 2.13 , bears interest at the applicable Eurodollar Rate.

          " Eurodollar Rate " means, with respect to a Eurodollar Advance for the relevant Interest Period, the sum of (i) the quotient of (a) the Eurodollar Base Rate applicable to such Interest Period, divided by (b) one minus the Reserve Requirement (expressed as a decimal) applicable to such Interest Period, plus (ii) the Applicable Margin.

          " Excluded Taxes " means, in the case of each Lender or applicable Lending Installation, the Issuer and the Agent, taxes imposed on its overall net income, and franchise taxes imposed on it, by (i) the jurisdiction under the laws of which such Lender, the Issuer or the Agent is incorporated or organized or (ii) the jurisdiction in which such Lender's, the Issuer's or the Agent's principal executive office or such Lender's applicable Lending Installation is located.

          " Existing Credit Facilities " means, collectively, (a) the Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of July 26, 2004 among PHI, PEPCO, DPL and ACE, as borrowers, various financial institutions and Bank One, NA, as administrative agent, as in effect on the Closing Date and (b) the Three-Year Credit Agreement dated as of July 29, 2003, among the Borrowers, various financial institutions and Bank One, NA, as administrative agent, as in effect on the Closing Date.

          " Existing Letters of Credit " means the letters of credit listed on Schedule 8 .

          " Extension Date " is defined in Section 2.4 .

          " Extension Notice " is defined in Section 2.4 .

          " Facility Fee Rate " means, at any time for any Borrower, the " Facility Fee Rate " applicable for such Borrower at such time in accordance with the provisions of the Pricing Schedule .

          " Facility Termination Date " means, with respect to any Borrower, May 5, 2010, as such date may be extended from time to time pursuant to Section 2.4 , or any earlier date on which such Borrower's Sublimit is reduced to zero or the obligations of the Lenders to make Credit Extensions to such Borrower is terminated pursuant to Section 8.1 .

5
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          " Federal Funds Effective Rate " means, for any day, an interest rate per annum equal to the weighted average of the rates on overnight Federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal funds brokers on such day, as published for such day (or, if such day is not a Business Day, for the immediately preceding Business Day) by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or, if such rate is not so published for any day which is a Business Day, the average of the quotations at approximately 11:00 a.m. (Charlotte time) on such day on such transactions received by the Agent from three Federal funds brokers of recognized standing selected by the Agent in its sole discretion.

          " Floating Rate Advance " means an Advance which, except as otherwise provided in Section 2.13 , bears interest at the Alternate Base Rate.

          " Floating Rate Loan " means a Loan which, except as otherwise provided in Section 2.13 , bears interest at the Alternate Base Rate.

          " FRB " means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and any successor thereto.

          " Granting Lender " is defined in Section 12.5 .

          " Increase Notice " is defined in Section 2.2 .

          " Indebtedness " of a Person means, without duplication, such Person's (i) obligations for borrowed money, (ii) obligations representing the deferred purchase price of Property or services (other than accounts payable arising in the ordinary course of such Person's business payable on terms customary in the trade), (iii) obligations, whether or not assumed, secured by Liens or payable out of the proceeds or production from Property now or hereafter owned or acquired by such Person, (iv) obligations which are evidenced by notes, bonds, debentures, acceptances or similar instruments, (v) obligations of such Person to purchase accounts, securities or other Property arising out of or in connection with the sale of the same or substantially similar accounts, securities or Property, (vi) Capitalized Lease Obligations, (vii) net liabilities under interest rate swap, exchange or cap agreements, obligations or other liabilities with respect to accounts or notes, (viii) obligations under any Synthetic Lease which, if such Synthetic Lease were accounted for as a Capitalized Lease, would appear on a balance sheet of such Person, (ix) unpaid reimbursement obligations in respect of letters of credit issued for the account of such Person and (x) Contingent Obligations in respect of Indebtedness of the types described above.

          " Intangible Transition Property " means assets described as " bondable transition property " in the New Jersey Transition Bond Statute.

          " Interest Period " means, with respect to a Eurodollar Advance, a period of one, two, three or six months commencing on a Business Day selected by the applicable Borrower pursuant to this Agreement. Such Interest Period shall end on the day which corresponds numerically to such date one, two, three or six months thereafter, provided that if there is no such numerically corresponding day in such next, second, third or sixth succeeding month, such Interest Period shall end on the last Business Day of such next, second, third or sixth succeeding month. If an Interest Period would otherwise end on a day which is not a Business Day, such Interest Period shall end on the next  succeeding Business  Day,   provided that if said  next succeeding  Business

6
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Day falls in a new calendar month, such Interest Period shall end on the immediately preceding Business Day. No Borrower may select an Interest Period which ends after the scheduled Facility Termination Date.

          " Issuer " means (a) with respect to Letters of Credit issued hereunder after the Closing Date, Wachovia in its capacity as issuer of such Letters of Credit, and (b) with respect to the Existing Letters of Credit, the issuer of such Existing Letters of Credit as set forth on Schedule 8 , which such Existing Letters of Credit may be replaced or renewed with Letters of Credit issued by Wachovia.

          " LC Fee Rate " means, at any time for any Borrower, the " LC Fee Rate " applicable for such Borrower at such time in accordance with the provisions of the Pricing Schedule .

          " LC Obligations " means, with respect to any Borrower at any time, the sum, without duplication, of (a) the aggregate undrawn stated amount of all Letters of Credit issued for the account of such Borrower at such time plus (b) the aggregate unpaid amount of all Reimbursement Obligations of such Borrower at such time.

          " Lender " is defined in the preamble .

          " Lending Installation " means, with respect to a Lender, the office, branch, subsidiary or affiliate of such Lender specified as such in its Administrative Questionnaire or otherwise selected by such Lender pursuant to Section 2.19 .

          " Letter of Credit " means any letter of credit issued pursuant to Section 2.21.1 and any Existing Letter of Credit.

          " Letter of Credit Application " is defined in Section 2.21.3 .

          " Letter of Credit Payment Date " is defined in Section 2.21.5 .

          " Letter of Credit Sublimit " means the lesser of $300,000,000 and the amount of the Aggregate Commitment.

          " Lien " means any lien (statutory or other), mortgage, pledge, hypothecation, assignment, deposit arrangement, encumbrance or preference, priority or other security agreement or preferential arrangement of any kind or nature whatsoever (including the interest of a vendor or lessor under any conditional sale, Capitalized Lease or other title retention agreement, but excluding the interest of a lessor under any operating lease).

          " Loan " means, with respect to a Lender, any loan made by such Lender pursuant to Article II (or any conversion or continuation thereof).

          " Loan Documents " means this Agreement, the Notes, the Letters of Credit and the Letter of Credit Applications.

          " Material Adverse Effect " means, with respect to any Borrower, a material adverse effect on (i) the business, Property, financial condition or results of operations of such Borrower and its

7
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Subsidiaries taken as a whole, (ii) the ability of such Borrower to perform its obligations under the Loan Documents or (iii) the validity or enforceability of any of the Loan Documents to which such Borrower is a party or the rights or remedies of the Agent, the Issuer or the Lenders against such Borrower thereunder; provided that in no event shall any Permitted ACE Asset Sale, Permitted PHI Asset Sale or Permitted DPL Asset Sale, individually or in the aggregate, be deemed to cause or result in a Material Adverse Effect.

          " Material Indebtedness " is defined in Section 7.5 .

          " Maturity Date " means, with respect to any Borrower, the scheduled Facility Termination Date for such Borrower, as such date may be extended from time to time pursuant to Section 2.4 , or such earlier date on which the Obligations of such Borrower become due and payable pursuant to Section 8.1 .

          " Modify " and " Modification " are defined in Section 2.21.1 .

          " Moody's " means Moody's Investors Service, Inc.

          " Multiemployer Plan " means a Plan maintained pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement or any other arrangement to which any Borrower or any other member of the Controlled Group is a party to which more than one employer is obligated to make contributions.

          " Net Worth " means, with respect to any Borrower at any time, the sum, without duplication, at such time of (a) such Borrower's stockholders' equity plus (b) all Preferred Stock of such Borrower (excluding any Preferred Stock which is mandatorily redeemable on or prior to the scheduled Facility Termination Date).

          " New Jersey Transition Bond Statute " means the New Jersey Electric Discount and Energy Corporation Act as in effect on the date hereof.

          " Non-Consenting Lender " is defined in Section 2.4 .

          " Nonrecourse Indebtedness " means, with respect to a Borrower, Indebtedness of such Borrower or any Subsidiary of such Borrower (excluding Nonrecourse Transition Bond Debt) secured by a Lien on the Property of such Borrower or such Subsidiary, as the case may be, the sole recourse for the payment of which is such Property and where neither PHI nor any of its Subsidiaries is liable for any deficiency after the application of the proceeds of such Property.

          " Nonrecourse Transition Bond Debt " means obligations evidenced by Transition Bonds rated investment grade or better by S&P or Moody's, representing a securitization of Intangible Transition Property as to which obligations no Borrower nor any Subsidiary of a Borrower (other than a Special Purpose Subsidiary) has any direct or indirect liability (whether as primary obligor, guarantor, surety, provider of collateral security, through a put option, asset repurchase agreement, capital maintenance agreement or debt subordination agreement, or through any other right or arrangement of any nature providing direct or indirect assurance of payment or performance of any such obligation in whole or in part), except for liability to repurchase Intangible  Transition Property  conveyed to  the securitization  vehicle, on  terms and conditions

8
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

customary in receivables securitizations, in the event such Intangible Transition Property violates representations and warranties of scope customary in receivables securitizations.

          " Non-U.S. Lender " is defined in Section 3.5(iv) .

          " Note " means any promissory note substantially in the form of Exhibit C issued at the request of a Lender pursuant to Section 2.15 .

          " Obligations " means, with respect to any Borrower, all unpaid principal of the Loans to such Borrower, all Reimbursement Obligations of such Borrower, all accrued and unpaid interest on such Loans and Reimbursement Obligations, all accrued and unpaid fees payable by such Borrower and all expenses, reimbursements, indemnities and other obligations payable by such Borrower to the Agent, the Issuer, any Lender or any other Indemnified Party arising under any Loan Document.

          " OFAC " means the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control.

          " Other Taxes " is defined in Section 3.5(ii) .

          " Outstanding Credit Extensions " means, with respect to any Borrower, the sum of the aggregate principal amount of all outstanding Loans to such Borrower plus all LC Obligations of such Borrower.

          " Participants " is defined in Section 12.2.1 .

          " Payment Date " means the last Business Day of each March, June, September and December.

          " PBGC " means the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, or any successor thereto.

          " PCI " means Potomac Capital Investment Corporation.

          " PEPCO " is defined in the preamble .

          " PEPCO Sublimit " means, at any time, the lesser of (a) $300,000,000, as such amount is (i) increased from time to time pursuant to Section 2.2 or (ii) reduced from time to time pursuant to Section 2.7 and (b) the maximum amount of short-term debt that PEPCO is authorized to have outstanding by Applicable Governmental Authorities minus any other applicable short-term debt of PEPCO.

          " Permitted ACE Asset Sale " means (a) the sale of the capital stock or assets of any Subsidiary of ACE other than a Significant Subsidiary of ACE, provided that the fair market value of all sales permitted solely by this clause (a) shall not exceed $10,000,000 in the aggregate during the term of this Agreement;

          (b)     the sale of the non-strategic generating assets of ACE as described on Schedule 6 ; and

9
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          (c)     the sale or transfer to PHI or a Subsidiary thereof (but not PEPCO or DPL or a Subsidiary of either of the foregoing) of any of the generating assets of ACE described on Schedule 6 .

          " Permitted ACE Liens " means the Lien of the Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated January 15, 1937 between ACE and The Bank of New York.

          " Permitted DPL Asset Sale " means the sale of the capital stock or assets of any Subsidiary of DPL other than a Significant Subsidiary of DPL, provided that the fair market value of all such sales shall not exceed $10,000,000 in the aggregate during the term of this Agreement.

          " Permitted DPL Liens " means the Lien of the Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated October 1, 1943 between DPL and JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), as trustee.

          " Permitted PEPCO Liens " means (a) the Lien of the Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated July 1, 1936 from PEPCO to The Bank of New York; and (b) the Lien created by the $152,000,000 sale/leaseback on November 30, 1994 of PEPCO's control center.

          " Permitted PHI Asset Sale " means the sale of (a) the centralized steam and chilled water production facility located on an approximately three-quarter acre site on the northeastern corner of the intersection of Atlantic and Ohio Avenues in Atlantic City, New Jersey and related distribution facilities; (b) ownership interests in cross-border leveraged leases and related assets owned by PCI and its Subsidiaries in an aggregate amount not exceeding a book value of $200,000,000; and (c) any Permitted ACE Asset Sale or Permitted DPL Asset Sale.

          " Permitted PHI Liens " means (a) Liens on assets of Conectiv Energy Supply, Inc. or any other Subsidiary of PHI (other than a Subsidiary Borrower or any Subsidiary thereof) which is engaged primarily in the energy trading business (a " Trading Subsidiary ") to secure obligations arising under energy trading agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business consistent with the past practice of DPL prior to September of 1999 and Liens on cash collateral to secure guaranties by PHI or Conectiv of the obligations of any Trading Subsidiary under such energy trading agreements, provided that the aggregate amount of all such cash collateral granted by PHI and Conectiv shall not at any time exceed $10,000,000; (b) Liens on the interests of (i) Conectiv Services, Inc., or any other Subsidiary of PHI (other than a Subsidiary Borrower or any Subsidiary thereof) which may hereafter own the stock of CTS (the " CTS Parent "), in the capital stock of Conectiv Thermal Systems, Inc. (" CTS "), (ii) CTS in Atlantic Jersey Thermal Systems, Inc. (" AJTS "), Thermal Energy Limited Partnership I (" TELP I ") and ATS Operating Services, Inc. and (iii) AJTS in TELP I, in each case securing Indebtedness of CTS for which neither PHI nor any of its Subsidiaries (other than CTS and its Subsidiaries and, solely with respect to the pledge of its interest in the capital stock of CTS, the CTS Parent) has any liability (contingent or otherwise); (c) Liens granted by a bankruptcy remote Subsidiary (the " SPV ") of PHI to facilitate a structured financing in an amount not exceeding $200,000,000; (d) Liens on the stock or assets of one or more Subsidiaries of PHI, other than PEPCO, DPL or ACE, in favor of the SPV; (e) Liens on the assets of Conectiv Bethlehem, LLC (together with any successor thereto so long as the primary business of such successor is the direct or indirect ownership and development of the

10
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Bethlehem Project (as defined below), " CBLLC ") and other Subsidiaries of PHI, and/or on the capital stock of CBLLC, to finance the development and construction of a mid-merit electric generating facility in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (the " Bethlehem Project "), provided that (i) the aggregate principal amount of the Indebtedness secured by such Liens shall not exceed $400,000,000 and (ii) such Liens (other than Liens granted by CBLLC and its Subsidiaries) shall only be granted on assets related to the Bethlehem Project; and (f) Liens on the assets of Conectiv Pennsylvania Generation, LLC (" CPG ") and/or on the capital stock of CPG, or its successor, to finance the development and construction of a mid-merit electric generating facility in the State of Pennsylvania (the " CPG Project "), provided that (i) the aggregate principal amount of the Indebtedness secured by such Liens shall not exceed $400,000,000 and (ii) such Liens (other than Liens granted by CPG and its Subsidiaries) shall only be granted on assets related to the CPG Project.

          " Person " means any natural person, corporation, firm, joint venture, partnership, limited liability company, association, enterprise, trust or other entity or organization, or any government or political subdivision or any agency, department or instrumentality thereof.

          " PHI " is defined in the preamble .

          " PHI Sublimit " means, at any time, the lesser of (a) $700,000,000, as such amount is (i) increased from time to time pursuant to Section 2.2 or (ii) reduced from time to time pursuant to Section 2.7 and (b) the maximum amount of short-term debt that PHI is authorized to have outstanding by Applicable Governmental Authorities minus any other applicable short-term debt of PHI.

          " Plan " means an employee pension benefit plan which is covered by Title IV of ERISA or subject to the minimum funding standards under Section 412 of the Code as to which any Borrower or any other member of the Controlled Group may have any liability.

          " Preferred Stock " means, with respect to any Person, equity interests issued by such Person that are entitled to a preference or priority over any other equity interests issued by such Person upon any distribution of such Person's property and assets, whether by dividend or upon liquidation.

          " Pricing Schedule " means Schedule 1 hereto.

          " Prime Rate " means a rate per annum equal to the prime rate of interest publicly announced by Wachovia or by its parent, Wachovia Corporation, from time to time, changing when and as such prime rate changes. The Prime Rate is an index or base rate and shall not necessarily be the lowest or best rate charged to its customers or other banks.

          " Property " of a Person means any and all property, whether real, personal, tangible, intangible, or mixed, of such Person, or other assets owned, leased or operated by such Person.

          " Prior Facility Termination Date " is defined in Section 2.4 .

          " Pro Rata Share " means, with respect to any Lender, the percentage which such Lender's Commitment constitutes of the Aggregate  Commitment (and/or, to  the extent the Commitments

11
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

have terminated, the percentage which such Lender's Loans and participation in LC Obligations constitutes of the aggregate principal amount of all Loans and LC Obligations). The initial Pro Rata Share of each Lender is set forth on Schedule 2 .

          " Public Reports " means (a) in the case of PEPCO, its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004; (b) in the case of DPL, its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004; (c) in the case of ACE, its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004; and (d) in the case of PHI, its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

          " PUHCA " means the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935.

          " Purchasers " is defined in Section 12.3.1 .

          " Reimbursement Obligations " means, with respect to any Borrower at any time, the aggregate amount of all obligations of such Borrower then outstanding under Section 2.21.6 to reimburse the Issuer for amounts paid by the Issuer in respect of one or more drawings under Letters of Credit.

          " Reportable Event " means a reportable event, as defined in Section 4043 of ERISA, with respect to a Plan, excluding, however, such events as to which the PBGC has by regulation waived the requirement of Section 4043(a) of ERISA that it be notified within 30 days of the occurrence of such event, provided that a failure to meet the minimum funding standard of Section 412 of the Code and of Section 302 of ERISA shall be a Reportable Event regardless of the issuance of any such waiver of the notice requirement in accordance with either Section 4043(a) of ERISA or Section 412(d) of the Code.

          " Requested Commitment Increase " is defined in Section 2.2 .

          " Required Lenders " means Lenders in the aggregate having more than 50% of the Aggregate Commitment or, if the Aggregate Commitment has been terminated, Lenders in the aggregate holding more than 50% of the aggregate unpaid principal amount of the Outstanding Credit Extensions to all Borrowers.

          " Reserve Requirement " means, with respect to an Interest Period, the maximum aggregate reserve requirement (including all basic, supplemental, marginal and other reserves) which is imposed under Regulation D of the FRB on Eurocurrency liabilities.

          " S&P " means Standard and Poor's Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.

          " SEC " means the Securities and Exchange Commission.

          " Securitization Transaction " means any sale, assignment or other transfer by a Borrower or a Subsidiary thereof of accounts receivable or other payment obligations owing to such Borrower or such Subsidiary or any interest in any of the foregoing, together in each case with any collections and other proceeds thereof, any collection or deposit accounts related thereto, and any  collateral,   guaranties  or  other  property  or  claims  in  favor  of  such   Borrower  or  such

12
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Subsidiary supporting or securing payment by the obligor thereon of, or otherwise related to, any such receivables.

          " Significant Subsidiary " means, with respect to any Borrower, a " significant subsidiary " (as defined in Regulation S-X of the SEC as in effect on the date of this Agreement) of such Borrower; provided that each of PEPCO, DPL and ACE shall at all times be a Significant Subsidiary of PHI.

          " Single Employer Plan " means, with respect to a Borrower, a Plan maintained by such Borrower or any member of the Controlled Group for employees of such Borrower or any member of the Controlled Group.

          " SPC " is defined in Section 12.5 .

          " SPV " is defined in the definition of Permitted PHI Liens.

          " Special Purpose Subsidiary " means a direct or indirect wholly owned corporate Subsidiary of ACE, substantially all of the assets of which are Intangible Transition Property and proceeds thereof, formed solely for the purpose of holding such assets and issuing Transition Bonds and, which complies with the requirements customarily imposed on bankruptcy-remote corporations in receivables securitizations.

          " Sublimit " means each of the PHI Sublimit, the PEPCO Sublimit, the DPL Sublimit and the ACE Sublimit.

          " Sublimit Percentage " means, with respect to any Subsidiary Borrower, the percentage which such Subsidiary Borrower's Sublimit is of the aggregate amount of the Sublimits of all Subsidiary Borrowers (without regard to the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit).

          " Subsidiary " of a Person means (i) any corporation more than 50% of the outstanding securities having ordinary voting power of which shall at the time be owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by such Person or by one or more of its Subsidiaries or by such Person and one or more of its Subsidiaries, or (ii) any partnership, limited liability company, association, business trust, joint venture or similar business organization more than 50% of the ownership interests having ordinary voting power of which shall at the time be so owned or controlled.

          " Subsidiary Borrower " means each of PEPCO, DPL and ACE; and " Subsidiary Borrowers " means all of the foregoing.

          " Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit " means the lesser of (a) $500,000,000, as such amount is (i) increased from time to time pursuant to Section 2.2 or (ii) reduced from time to time pursuant to Section 2.7 ; and (b) the sum of the Sublimits of all Subsidiary Borrowers.

          " Substantial Portion " means, at any time with respect to the Property of any Person, Property which represents more than 10% of the consolidated assets of such Person and its Subsidiaries as shown in the consolidated financial statements of such Person and its Subsidiaries as at the last day of the preceding fiscal year of such Person.

13
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          " Synthetic Lease " means (a) a so-called synthetic, off-balance sheet or tax retention lease or (b) any other agreement pursuant to which a Person obtains the use or possession of property and which creates obligations that do not appear on the balance sheet of such Person but which, upon the insolvency or bankruptcy of such Person, would be characterized as indebtedness of such Person (without regard to accounting treatment).

          " Taxes " means any and all present or future taxes, duties, levies, imposts, deductions, charges or withholdings, and any and all liabilities with respect to the foregoing which arise from or relate to any payment made hereunder or under any Note or Letter of Credit Application, but excluding Excluded Taxes and Other Taxes.

          " Total Capitalization " means, with respect to any Borrower at any time, the sum of the Total Indebtedness of such Borrower plus the Net Worth of such Borrower, each calculated at such time.

          " Total Indebtedness " means, with respect to any Borrower at any time, all Indebtedness of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries at such time determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with Agreement Accounting Principles, excluding , to the extent otherwise included in Indebtedness of such Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, (a) any Nonrecourse Transition Bond Debt; (b) any Nonrecourse Indebtedness listed on Schedule 5 ; (c) to the extent it constitutes Nonrecourse Indebtedness, any Indebtedness secured by liens described in clause (e) or (d) of the definition of Permitted PHI Liens; (e) any other Nonrecourse Indebtedness of PHI and its Subsidiaries (excluding any Subsidiary Borrower and its Subsidiaries) to the extent that the aggregate amount of such Nonrecourse Indebtedness does not exceed $200,000,000; and (f) all Indebtedness of PCI and, without duplication, of PHI the proceeds of which were used to make loans or advances to PCI, in an aggregate amount not exceeding the lesser of (i) the fair market value of the equity collateral accounts in PCI's energy leveraged lease portfolio or (ii) $700,000,000.

          " Transferee " is defined in Section 12.4 .

          " Transition Bonds " means bonds described as " transition bonds " in the New Jersey Transition Bond Statute.

          " Type " means, with respect to any Advance, its nature as a Floating Rate Advance or a Eurodollar Advance.

          " Unmatured Default " means an event which but for the lapse of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a Default.

          " Utilization Fee Rate " means, at any time for any Borrower, the " Utilization Fee Rate " applicable for such Borrower at such time in accordance with the Pricing Schedule .

          " Voting Stock " means, with respect to any Person, voting stock of any class or kind ordinarily having the power to vote for the election of directors, managers or other voting members of the governing body of such Person.

14
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          " Wachovia " means Wachovia Bank, National Association, a national banking association, and its successors.

          1.2      Interpretation.

          (a)     The meanings of defined terms are equally applicable to the singular and plural forms of such terms.

          (b)      Article , Section , Schedule and Exhibit references are to this Agreement unless otherwise specified.

          (c)     The term " including " is not limiting and means " including without limitation ."

          (d)     In the computation of periods of time from a specified date to a later specified date, the word " from " means " from and including "; the words " to " and " until " each mean " to but excluding ", and the word " through " means " to and including ."

          (e)     Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, (i) references to agreements (including this Agreement) and other contractual instruments shall be deemed to include all subsequent amendments and other modifications thereto, but only to the extent such amendments and other modifications are not prohibited by the terms of this Agreement; and (ii) references to any statute or regulation are to be construed as including all statutory and regulatory provisions consolidating, amending, replacing, supplementing or interpreting such statute or regulation.

          (f)     Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, references herein shall be references to Eastern time (daylight or standard as applicable).

          1.3      Accounting .

          (a)     Except as provided to the contrary herein, all accounting terms used herein shall be interpreted and all accounting determinations hereunder shall be made in accordance with Agreement Accounting Principles, except that any calculation or determination which is to be made on a consolidated basis shall be made for the applicable Borrower and all of its Subsidiaries, including those Subsidiaries of such Borrower, if any, which are unconsolidated on such Borrower's audited financial statements.

          (b)     If at any time any change in Agreement Accounting Principles would affect the computation of any financial ratio or requirement set forth herein with respect to any Borrower and either such Borrower or the Required Lenders shall so request, the Agent, the Lenders and such Borrower shall negotiate in good faith to amend such ratio or requirement to preserve the original intent thereof in light of such change in Agreement Accounting Principles (subject to the approval of the Required Lenders); provided that, until so amended, (i) such ratio or requirement shall continue to be computed in accordance with Agreement Accounting Principles as in effect prior to such change and (ii) such Borrower shall provide to the Agent and the Lenders financial statements and other documents required under this Agreement setting forth a reconciliation between calculations of such ratio or requirement made before and after giving effect to such change in Agreement Accounting Principles.

15
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ARTICLE II

THE CREDITS

          2.1      Commitment . Each Lender severally agrees, on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, to make Loans to any Borrower, and to participate in Letters of Credit issued upon the request of any Borrower, in amounts not to exceed in the aggregate at any one time outstanding the amount of such Lender's Commitment; provided that (i) the aggregate principal amount of all Loans by such Lender to any Borrower shall not exceed such Lender's Pro Rata Share of the aggregate principal amount of all Loans to such Borrower; (ii) such Lender's participation in Letters of Credit issued for the account of any Borrower shall not exceed such Lender's Pro Rata Share of all LC Obligations of such Borrower; (iii) the Outstanding Credit Extensions to PHI shall not at any time exceed the PHI Sublimit; (iv) the Outstanding Credit Extensions to PEPCO shall not any time exceed the PEPCO Sublimit; (v) the Outstanding Credit Extensions to DPL shall not at any time exceed the DPL Sublimit; (vi) the Outstanding Credit Extensions to ACE shall not at any time exceed the ACE Sublimit; (vii) the Outstanding Credit Extensions to all Subsidiary Borrowers collectively shall not at any time exceed the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit; and (viii) the LC Obligations of all Borrowers collectively shall not at any time exceed the Letter of Credit Sublimit. Within the foregoing limits, each Borrower may from time to time borrow, prepay pursuant to Section 2.9 and reborrow hereunder prior to the Facility Termination Date for such Borrower.

          2.2.      Increase in Commitments .

          (a)     At any time prior to the Facility Termination Date, the Borrowers shall have the ability, in consultation with the Agent and through written notice to the Agent, substantially in the form of Exhibit E (the " Increase Notice "), to request increases in the Aggregate Commitment (each, a " Requested Commitment Increase "); provided that (i) no Lender shall have any obligation to participate in any Requested Commitment Increase, (ii) the aggregate principal amount of all such increases shall not exceed $300,000,000, (iii) each such Requested Commitment Increase shall be in a minimum principal amount of $50,000,000 or, if less, the maximum remaining amount permitted pursuant to clause (ii) above, (iv) any such increase shall be allocated pro rata among the PHI Sublimit and the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit, and (v) no Default or Unmatured Default shall have occurred and be continuing or would result from the proposed Requested Commitment Increase. Any increase in the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit pursuant to this Section 2.2(a) shall result in a percentage increase in each of the ACE Sublimit, the DPL Sublimit and the PEPCO Sublimit, respectively, equal to the percentage increase in the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit.

          (b)     The Agent shall promptly give notice of such Requested Commitment Increase to the Lenders. Each Lender shall notify the Agent within ten (10) Business Days (or such longer period of time which may be agreed upon by the Agent and the Borrowers and communicated to the Lenders) from the date of delivery of such notice to the Lenders whether or not it offers to increase its Commitment and, if so, by what amount. Any Lender not responding within such time period shall be deemed to have declined to offer to increase its Commitment. The Agent shall notify the Borrowers of the Lenders' responses to each request made hereunder. The Borrowers shall have the right at their sole discretion to accept or reject in whole or in part any

16
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

offered Commitment increase or at their own expense to solicit a Commitment from any third party financial institution reasonably acceptable to the Agent. Any such financial institution (if not already a Lender hereunder) shall become a party to this Agreement, as a Lender pursuant to a joinder agreement in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Agent and the Borrowers.

          (c)     Upon the completion of each Requested Commitment Increase, (i) entries in the accounts maintained pursuant to Section 2.15 will be revised to reflect the revised Commitments and Pro Rata Shares of each of the Lenders (including each new Lender becoming a party to this Agreement pursuant to clause (b) above) and (ii) the outstanding Loans will be reallocated on the effective date of such increase among the Lenders in accordance with their revised Pro Rata Shares and the Lenders (including each new Lender becoming a party to this Agreement pursuant to clause (b) above) agree to make all payments and adjustments necessary to effect such reallocation and the Borrowers shall pay any and all costs required in connection with such reallocation as if such reallocation were a prepayment.

          2.3      Required Payments; Termination . All outstanding Advances to any Borrower and all other unpaid Obligations of such Borrower shall be paid in full by such Borrower on the Maturity Date for such Borrower.

          2.4      Extension of Facility Termination Date .

          (a)     The Borrowers may, no earlier than 60 days and no later than 30 days prior to each anniversary of the Closing Date (such anniversary, an " Extension Date "), request through written notice to the Agent substantially in the form of Exhibit F (the " Extension Notice "), that the Lenders extend the then existing Facility Termination Date for an additional one year period. Each Lender, acting in its sole discretion, shall, by notice to the Agent no earlier than 30 days prior to the applicable Extension Date and no later than the applicable Extension Date (except with respect to the year in which the then existing Facility Termination Date shall occur, in which case such written notice shall be delivered by the Lenders no later than 15 days prior to the then existing Facility Termination Date) (such date, the " Consent Date "), advise the Agent in writing of its desire to extend (any such Lender, a " Consenting Lender ") or not to so extend (any such Lender, a " Non-Consenting Lender ") such date. Any Lender that does not advise the Agent by the Consent Date shall be deemed to be a Non-Consenting Lender. No Lender shall be under any obligation or commitment to extend the then existing Facility Termination Date. The election of any Lender to agree to such extension shall not obligate any other Lender to agree to such extension.

          (b)     If (and only if) Lenders holding Commitments that aggregate more than 50% of the Aggregate Commitment on the Consent Date shall have agreed to such extension, then the then existing Facility Termination Date applicable to the Consenting Lenders shall be extended to the date that is one year after the then existing Facility Termination Date. All Loans of each Non-Consenting Lender shall be subject to the then existing Facility Termination Date, without giving effect to such extension (such date, the " Prior Facility Termination Date "). In the event of an extension of the then existing Facility Termination Date pursuant to this Section 2.4 , the Borrowers shall have the right, at their own expense, to solicit commitments from existing Lenders and/or third party financial institutions reasonably acceptable to the Agent to replace the

17
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Commitment of any Non-Consenting Lenders for the remaining duration of the Facility. Any such financial institution (if not already a Lender hereunder) shall become a party to this Agreement, as a Lender pursuant to a joinder agreement in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Agent and the Borrowers. The Commitment of each Non-Consenting Lender shall terminate on the Prior Facility Termination Date, all Loans and other amounts payable hereunder to such Non-Consenting Lenders shall be subject to the Prior Facility Termination Date and, to the extent such Non-Consenting Lender's Commitment is not replaced as provided above, the Aggregate Commitment hereunder shall be reduced by the amount of the Commitments of such Non-Consenting Lenders so terminated on the Prior Facility Termination Date. Any such reduction in the Aggregate Commitment shall be allocated pro rata among the PHI Sublimit and the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit and such decrease in the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit shall result in a percentage decrease in each of the ACE Sublimit, the DPL Sublimit and the PEPCO Sublimit, respectively, equal to the percentage decrease in the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit.

          (c)     Effective on and after the Prior Facility Termination Date, (i) each of the Non-Consenting Lenders shall be automatically released from their respective risk participation obligations under Section 2.21 with respect to any outstanding Letters of Credit and (ii) the risk participation obligation of each Lender (other than the Non-Consenting Lenders) under Section 2.21 with respect to any outstanding Letters of Credit (and the related LC Obligations) shall be automatically adjusted to equal such Lender's Pro Rata Share of such Letters of Credit (and the related LC Obligations).

          2.5      Ratable Loans . Each Advance hereunder shall be made by the Lenders ratably in accordance with their Pro Rata Shares.

          2.6      Types of Advances . The Advances to any Borrower may be Floating Rate Advances or Eurodollar Advances, or a combination thereof, as selected by such Borrower in accordance with Sections 2.10 and 2.11 .

          2.7      Facility Fee; Utilization Fee; Reductions in Aggregate Commitment .

          (a)     Each Borrower agrees to pay to the Agent for the account of the Lenders according to their Pro Rata Shares a facility fee at a per annum rate equal to the Facility Fee Rate for such Borrower on the daily amount of (i) in the case of PHI, the PHI Sublimit, and (ii) in the case of each Subsidiary Borrower, such Subsidiary Borrower's Sublimit Percentage of the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit (in each case regardless of the amount of Outstanding Credit Extensions to such Borrower); provided that if the obligations of the Lenders to make Credit Extensions to a Borrower have been terminated pursuant to Section 8.1 , the facility fee shall be based on the Outstanding Credit Extensions to such Borrower. Facility fees payable by each Borrower shall accrue from the Closing Date to the Facility Termination Date for such Borrower (or, if later, to the date all of such Borrower's Obligations have been paid in full) and shall be payable on each Payment Date and on the Facility Termination Date (and, if applicable, thereafter on demand).

          (b)     PHI agrees to pay to the Agent for the account of the Lenders according to their Pro Rata  Shares  a  utilization  fee,  for  each  day  on  which  the  Outstanding  Credit  Extensions to

18
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PHI exceed 50% of the PHI Sublimit, at a rate per annum equal to the Utilization Fee Rate for PHI on the Outstanding Credit Extensions to PHI on such day, payable on each Payment Date and on the Facility Termination Date for PHI.

          (c)     Each Subsidiary Borrower agrees to pay to the Agent for the account of the Lenders according to their Pro Rata Shares a utilization fee, for each day on which the Outstanding Credit Extensions to all Subsidiary Borrowers exceed 50% of the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit, at a rate per annum equal to the Utilization Fee Rate for such Subsidiary Borrower on the Outstanding Credit Extensions to such Subsidiary Borrower on such day, payable on each Payment Date and on the Facility Termination Date for such Subsidiary Borrower.

          (d)     Any Borrower may permanently reduce such Borrower's Sublimit, and the Subsidiary Borrowers acting collectively may reduce the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit, in each case in whole, or in part ratably among the Lenders in accordance with their Pro Rata Shares, and in integral multiples of $10,000,000, upon at least five Business Days' written notice to the Agent, which notice shall specify the amount of any such reduction, provided that (i) no Borrower's Sublimit may be reduced below the amount of the Outstanding Credit Extensions to such Borrower and (ii) the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit may not be reduced below the amount of the Outstanding Credit Extensions to all Subsidiary Borrowers. Any reduction of the PHI Sublimit or the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit shall reduce the Aggregate Commitment by a corresponding amount. No reduction of a Subsidiary Borrower's individual Sublimit shall reduce the Aggregate Commitment except to the extent that such reduction reduces the amount of the Subsidiary Borrower Sublimit.

          2.8      Minimum Amount of Each Advance . Each Advance shall be in the amount of $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000; provided that any Floating Rate Advance may be in the amount of the unused Aggregate Commitment or in the amount of the applicable Borrower's unused Sublimit.

          2.9      Prepayments .

          (a)      Mandatory . If at any time, a Borrower's Outstanding Credit Extensions exceed such Borrower's Sublimit, such Borrower shall immediately prepay Loans (or if all Loans to such Borrower have been paid, prepay LC Obligations) in an amount (rounded upward, if necessary, to an integral multiple of $1,000,000) sufficient to eliminate such excess.

          (b)      Voluntary . Any Borrower may from time to time prepay, without penalty or premium, all outstanding Floating Rate Advances to such Borrower or, in the amount of $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000, any portion of the outstanding Floating Rate Advances to such Borrower, upon one Business Day's prior notice to the Agent. Any Borrower may from time to time prepay, all outstanding Eurodollar Advances to such Borrower or, in the amount of $10,000,000 or a higher integral multiple of $1,000,000, any portion of the outstanding Eurodollar Advances to such Borrower upon three Business Days' prior notice to the Agent.

19
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          (c)     Any prepayment of Eurodollar Advances shall be without premium or penalty but shall be subject to the payment of any funding indemnification amounts covered by Section 3.4 .

          2.10    Method of Selecting Types and Interest Periods for New Advances . The applicable Borrower shall select the Type of Advance and, in the case of each Eurodollar Advance, the Interest Period applicable thereto from time to time. The applicable Borrower shall give the Agent irrevocable notice (a " Borrowing Notice ") not later than 11:00 a.m. (Charlotte time) on the Borrowing Date of each Floating Rate Advance to such Borrower and three Business Days before the Borrowing Date for each Eurodollar Advance to such Borrower, specifying:

          (i)     the Borrowing Date, which shall be a Business Day, of such Advance,

          (ii)    the aggregate amount of such Advance,

          (iii)   the Type of Advance selected, and

          (iv)    in the case of each Eurodollar Advance, the Interest Period applicable thereto.

Not later than 1:00 p.m. (Charlotte time) on each Borrowing Date, each Lender shall make available its Loan or Loans in funds immediately available in Charlotte to the Agent at its address specified pursuant to Article XIII . The Agent will promptly make the funds so received from the Lenders available to the applicable Borrower at the Agent's aforesaid address.

          2.11    Conversion and Continuation of Outstanding Advances . Floating Rate Advances shall continue as Floating Rate Advances unless and until such Floating Rate Advances are converted into Eurodollar Advances pursuant to this Section 2.11 or are repaid in accordance with Section 2.9 . Each Eurodollar Advance shall continue as a Eurodollar Advance until the end of the then applicable Interest Period therefor, at which time such Eurodollar Advance shall be automatically converted into a Floating Rate Advance unless (x) such Eurodollar Advance is or was repaid in accordance with Section 2.9 or (y) the applicable Borrower shall have given the Agent a Conversion/Continuation Notice requesting that, at the end of such Interest Period, such Eurodollar Advance continue as a Eurodollar Advance for a subsequent Interest Period. Subject to the terms of Section 2.8 any Borrower may elect from time to time to convert all or any part of a Floating Rate Advance into a Eurodollar Advance. Such Borrower shall give the Agent irrevocable notice (a " Conversion/Continuation Notice ") of each conversion of a Floating Rate Advance into a Eurodollar Advance or continuation of a Eurodollar Advance not later than 11:00 a.m. (Charlotte time) at least three Business Days prior to the date of the requested conversion or continuation, specifying:

          (i)     the requested date, which shall be a Business Day, of such conversion or continuation,

          (ii)    the aggregate amount and Type of the Advance which is to be converted or continued, and

          (iii)   the amount of such Advance which is to be converted into or continued as a Eurodollar Advance and the duration of the Interest Period applicable thereto.

20
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          2.12      Changes in Interest Rate, etc . Each Floating Rate Advance shall bear interest on the outstanding principal amount thereof, for each day from the date such Advance is made or is converted from a Eurodollar Advance into a Floating Rate Advance pursuant to Section 2.11 to the date it is paid or is converted into a Eurodollar Advance pursuant to Section 2.11 , at a rate per annum equal to the Alternate Base Rate for such day. Changes in the rate of interest on that portion of any Advance maintained as a Floating Rate Advance will take effect simultaneously with each change in the Alternate Base Rate. Each Eurodollar Advance shall bear interest on the outstanding principal amount thereof from the first day of each Interest Period applicable thereto to the last day of such Interest Period at the Eurodollar Rate applicable to such Eurodollar Advance based upon the applicable Borrower's selections under Sections 2.10 and 2.11 and otherwise in accordance with the terms hereof.

          2.13      Rates Applicable After Default . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Section 2.10 or 2.11 , during the continuance of a Default or Unmatured Default with respect to a Borrower, the Required Lenders may, at their option, by notice to such Borrower (which notice may be revoked at the option of the Required Lenders notwithstanding any provision of Section 8.2 requiring unanimous consent of the Lenders to changes in interest rates), declare that no Advance to such Borrower may be made as, converted into or continued as a Eurodollar Advance. During the continuance of a Default with respect to a Borrower, the Required Lenders may, at their option, by notice to such Borrower (which notice may be revoked at the option of the Required Lenders notwithstanding any provision of Section 8.2 requiring unanimous consent of the Lenders to changes in interest rates), declare that (i) each Eurodollar Advance to such Borrower shall bear interest for the remainder of the applicable Interest Period at the rate otherwise applicable to such Interest Period plus 2% per annum, (ii) each Floating Rate Advance to such Borrower shall bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the Alternate Base Rate in effect from time to time plus 2% per annum and (iii) the LC Fee Rate payable by such Borrower shall be increased by 2% per annum, provided that during the continuance of a Default under Section 7.6 or 7.7 with respect to any Borrower, the interest rates set forth in clauses (i) and (ii) above and the increase in the LC Fee Rate set forth in clause (iii) above shall be applicable to all Outstanding Credit Extensions to such Borrower without any election or action on the part of the Agent or any Lender.

          2.14      Method of Payment . All payments of the Obligations hereunder shall be made, without setoff, deduction, or counterclaim, in immediately available funds to the Agent at the Agent's address specified pursuant to Article XIII , or at any other office of the Agent specified in writing by the Agent to the Borrowers, by 1:00 p.m. (Charlotte time) on the date when due and shall be applied ratably by the Agent among the Lenders. Each payment delivered to the Agent for the account of any Lender shall be delivered promptly by the Agent to such Lender in the same type of funds that the Agent received at its address specified pursuant to Article XIII or at any Lending Installation specified in a notice received by the Agent from such Lender. The Agent is hereby authorized to charge the account of the applicable Borrower maintained with Wachovia for each payment of principal, Reimbursement Obligations, interest and fees as it becomes due hereunder.

21
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          2.15    Noteless Agreement; Evidence of Indebtedness .

          (a)     Each Lender shall maintain in accordance with its usual practice an account or accounts evidencing the indebtedness of each Borrower to such Lender resulting from each Loan made by such Lender to such Borrower from time to time, including the amounts of principal and interest payable and paid to such Lender from time to time hereunder.

          (b)     The Agent shall also maintain accounts in which it will record (i) the amount of each Loan to each Borrower made hereunder, the Type thereof and the Interest Period with respect thereto, (ii) the amount of any principal or interest due and payable or to become due and payable from each Borrower to each Lender hereunder, (iii) the stated amount of each Letter of Credit and the amount of the LC Obligations outstanding at any time and (iv) the amount of any sum received by the Agent hereunder from each Borrower and each Lender's share thereof.

          (c)     The entries maintained in the accounts maintained pursuant to clauses (a) and ( b ) above shall be prima facie evidence of the existence and amounts of the Obligations therein recorded; provided that the failure of the Agent or any Lender to maintain such accounts or any error therein shall not in any manner affect the obligation of the applicable Borrower to repay the Obligations of such Borrower in accordance with their terms.

          (d)     Any Lender may request that its Loans to any Borrower be evidenced by a Note. In such event, such Borrower shall prepare, execute and deliver to such Lender a Note payable to the order of such Lender. Thereafter, the Loans evidenced by such Note and interest thereon shall at all times (including after any assignment pursuant to Section 12.3 ) be represented by one or more Notes payable to the order of the payee named therein or any assignee pursuant to Section 12.3 , except to the extent that any such Lender or assignee subsequently returns any such Note for cancellation and requests that such Loans once again be evidenced as described in clauses (a) and ( b ) above.

          2.16    Telephonic Notices . Each Borrower hereby authorizes the Lenders and the Agent to extend, convert or continue Advances, to effect selections of Types of Advances and to transfer funds based on telephonic notices made by any person the Agent or any Lender in good faith believes to be acting on behalf of such Borrower, it being understood that the foregoing authorization is specifically intended to allow Borrowing Notices and Conversion/Continuation Notices to be given telephonically. Each Borrower agrees that upon the request of the Agent or any Lender, such Borrower will deliver promptly to the Agent a written confirmation signed by an Authorized Officer of such Borrower, of each telephonic notice given by such Borrower pursuant to the preceding sentence. If the written confirmation differs in any material respect from the action taken by the Agent and the Lenders, the records of the Agent and the Lenders shall govern absent manifest error.

          2.17    Interest Payment Dates; Interest and Fee Basis . Interest accrued on each Floating Rate Advance shall be payable on each Payment Date, on any date on which such Floating Rate Advance is prepaid, whether due to acceleration or otherwise, and at maturity. Interest accrued on that portion of the outstanding principal amount of any Floating Rate Advance converted into a Eurodollar Advance on a day other than a Payment Date shall be payable on the date of conversion. Interest accrued on  each Eurodollar  Advance shall be payable on  the last day of its

22
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

applicable Interest Period (and, in the case of a six-month Interest Period, on the day which is three months after the first day of such Interest Period), on any date on which such Eurodollar Advance is prepaid, whether by acceleration or otherwise, and at maturity. Interest on Floating Rate Advances which are bearing interest at the Prime Rate shall be calculated for actual days elapsed on the basis of a 365-day year or, when appropriate, 366-day year. All other interest and all fees shall be calculated for actual days elapsed on the basis of a 360-day year. Interest shall be payable for the day an Advance is made but not for the day of any payment on the amount paid if payment is received prior to 1:00 p.m. (Charlotte time) at the place of payment. If any payment of principal of or interest on an Advance shall become due on a day which is not a Business Day, such payment shall be made on the next succeeding Business Day and, in the case of a principal payment, such extension of time shall be included in computing interest in connection with such payment.

          2.18      Notification of Advances, Interest Rates, Prepayments and Commitment Reductions . Promptly after receipt thereof, the Agent will notify each Lender of the contents of each notice of reduction in the Aggregate Commitment or any Sublimit, Borrowing Notice, Conversion/Continuation Notice, notice of repayment, Increase Notice and Extension Notice received by the Agent hereunder. The Agent will notify each Lender of the interest rate applicable to each Eurodollar Advance promptly upon determination of such interest rate and will give each Lender prompt notice of each change in the Alternate Base Rate.

          2.19      Lending Installations . Each Lender may book its Loans at any Lending Installation selected by such Lender and may change its Lending Installation from time to time. All terms of this Agreement shall apply to any such Lending Installation and the Loans and any Notes issued hereunder shall be deemed held by each Lender for the benefit of any such Lending Installation. Each Lender may, by written notice to the Agent and the Borrowers in accordance with Article XIII , designate replacement or additional Lending Installations through which Loans will be made by it and for whose account Loan payments are to be made.

          2.20      Non-Receipt of Funds by the Agent . Unless a Borrower or a Lender, as the case may be, notifies the Agent prior to the date on which it is scheduled to make payment to the Agent of (i) in the case of a Lender, the proceeds of a Loan or (ii) in the case of a Borrower, a payment of principal, interest or fees to the Agent for the account of the Lenders, that it does not intend to make such payment, the Agent may assume that such payment has been made. The Agent may, but shall not be obligated to, make the amount of such payment available to the intended recipient in reliance upon such assumption. If a Lender or a Borrower, as the case may be, has not in fact made such payment to the Agent, the recipient of such payment shall, on demand by the Agent, repay to the Agent the amount so made available together with interest thereon in respect of each day during the period commencing on the date such amount was so made available by the Agent until the date the Agent recovers such amount at a rate per annum equal to (x) in the case of payment by a Lender, the Federal Funds Effective Rate for such day for the first three days and, thereafter, the interest rate applicable to the relevant Loan or (y) in the case of payment by a Borrower, the interest rate applicable to the relevant Obligation.

23
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          2.21      Letters of Credit .

          2.21.1           Issuance; Existing Letters of Credit . The Issuer hereby agrees, on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement (including the limitations set forth in Section 2.1 ), to issue standby letters of credit and to renew, extend, increase, decrease or otherwise modify Letters of Credit (" Modify " and each such action a " Modification ") upon the request and for the account of any Borrower (including Letters of Credit issued jointly for the account of a Borrower and any Subsidiary of such Borrower) from time to time from the Closing Date to the Facility Termination Date for such Borrower. No Letter of Credit shall have an expiry date later than the scheduled Facility Termination Date. By their execution of this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that on the Closing Date (without any further action by any Person), each Existing Letter of Credit shall be deemed to have been issued under this Agreement and the rights and obligations of the issuer and account party thereunder shall be subject to the terms hereof.

          2.21.2           Participations . Upon the issuance or Modification by the Issuer of a Letter of Credit in accordance with this Section 2.21 (or, in the case of the Existing Letters of Credit, on the Closing Date), the Issuer shall be deemed, without further action by any party hereto, to have unconditionally and irrevocably sold to each Lender, and each Lender shall be deemed, without further action by any party hereto, to have unconditionally and irrevocably purchased from the Issuer, a participation in such Letter of Credit (and each Modification thereof and the related LC Obligations) in proportion to its Pro Rata Share.

          2.21.3           Notice . The applicable Borrower shall give the Issuer notice prior to 11:00 a.m. (Charlotte time) at least three Business Days prior to the proposed date of issuance or Modification of a Letter of Credit for the account of such Borrower, specifying the beneficiary, the proposed date of issuance (or Modification) and the expiry date of such Letter of Credit, and describing the proposed terms of such Letter of Credit and the nature of the transactions proposed to be supported thereby. Upon receipt of such notice, the Issuer shall promptly notify the Agent, and the Agent shall promptly notify each Lender, of the contents thereof and of the amount of such Lender's participation in such proposed Letter of Credit. The issuance or Modification by the Issuer of any Letter of Credit shall, in addition to the conditions precedent set forth in Article IV (the satisfaction of which the Issuer shall have no duty to ascertain), be subject to the conditions precedent that such Letter of Credit shall be reasonably satisfactory to the Issuer and that the applicable Borrower shall have executed and delivered such application agreement and/or such other instruments and agreements relating to such Letter of Credit as the Issuer shall have reasonably requested (each a " Letter of Credit Application "). In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the terms of any Letter of Credit Application, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

          2.21.4           Letter of Credit Fees . Each Borrower shall pay to the Agent, for the account of the Lenders ratably in accordance with their respective Pro Rata Shares, with respect to each Letter of Credit issued for the account of such Borrower, a letter of credit fee at a per annum rate equal to the LC Fee Rate in effect from time to time on the amount available under such Letter of Credit, such fee to be payable in arrears on each Payment Date. Each Borrower shall also pay to the Issuer for its own account (x) a fronting fee in the amount agreed to by the Issuer and such Borrower from time to time for each Letter of Credit issued for the account of such Borrower, with  such  fee  to  be  payable  in  arrears  on   each  Payment  Date,  and  (y)  documentary  and

24
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

processing charges in connection with the issuance or Modification of and draws under Letters of Credit issued for the account of such Borrower in accordance with the Issuer's standard schedule for such charges as in effect from time to time.

          2.21.5           Administration; Reimbursement by Lenders . Upon receipt from the beneficiary of any Letter of Credit of any demand for payment under such Letter of Credit, the Issuer shall notify the Agent and the Agent shall promptly notify the applicable Borrower and each Lender as to the amount to be paid by the Issuer as a result of such demand and the proposed payment date (the " Letter of Credit Payment Date "). The responsibility of the Issuer to the applicable Borrower and each Lender shall be only to determine that the documents (including each demand for payment) delivered under each Letter of Credit in connection with such presentment shall be in conformity in all material respects with such Letter of Credit. The Issuer shall endeavor to exercise the same care in its issuance and administration of Letters of Credit as it does with respect to letters of credit in which no participations are granted, it being understood that in the absence of any gross negligence or willful misconduct by the Issuer, each Lender shall be unconditionally and irrevocably obligated, without regard to the occurrence of any Default or Unmatured Default or any condition precedent whatsoever, to reimburse the Issuer on demand for (i) such Lender's Pro Rata Share of the amount of each payment made by the Issuer under each Letter of Credit to the extent such amount is not reimbursed by the applicable Borrower pursuant to Section 2.21.6 plus (ii) interest on the foregoing amount for each day from the date of the applicable payment by the Issuer to the date on which such Lender pays the amount to be reimbursed by it, at a rate of interest per annum equal to the Federal Funds Effective Rate or, beginning on third Business Day after demand for such amount by the Issuer, the rate applicable to Floating Rate Advances.

          2.21.6           Reimbursement by Borrowers . Each Borrower shall be irrevocably and unconditionally obligated to reimburse the Issuer on or before the applicable Letter of Credit Payment Date for any amount to be paid by the Issuer upon any drawing under any Letter of Credit issued by the Issuer for the account of such Borrower, without presentment, demand, protest or other formalities of any kind; provided that no Borrower shall be precluded from asserting any claim for direct (but not consequential) damages suffered by such Borrower to the extent, but only to the extent, caused by (i) the willful misconduct or gross negligence of the Issuer in determining whether a request presented under any Letter of Credit issued by it for the account of such Borrower complied with the terms of such Letter of Credit or (ii) the Issuer's failure to pay under any Letter of Credit issued by it for the account of such Borrower after the presentation to it of a request strictly complying with the terms and conditions of such Letter of Credit. All such amounts paid by the Issuer and remaining unpaid by the applicable Borrower shall bear interest, payable on demand, for each day until paid at a rate per annum equal to (x) on or prior to the date on which the Issuer notifies such Borrower of the amount paid under any Letter of Credit, the rate applicable to Floating Rate Advances, and (y) thereafter, the sum of 2% plus the rate applicable to Floating Rate Advances. The Issuer will pay to each Lender ratably in accordance with its Pro Rata Share all amounts received by it from a Borrower for application in payment, in whole or in part, of the Reimbursement Obligation in respect of any Letter of Credit issued by the Issuer and any interest thereon, but only to the extent (and, in the case of interest, for the period of time) such Lender has made payment to the Issuer in respect of such Letter of Credit pursuant to Section 2.21.5 .

25
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          2.21.7           Obligations Absolute . Each Borrower's obligations under this Section 2.21 with respect to each Letter of Credit issued for the account of such Borrower shall be absolute and unconditional under any and all circumstances and irrespective of any setoff, counterclaim or defense to payment which such Borrower may have or have had against the Issuer, any Lender or any beneficiary of any such Letter of Credit. Each Borrower agrees with the Issuer and the Lenders that neither the Issuer nor any Lender shall be responsible for, and the applicable Borrower's Reimbursement Obligation in respect of any Letter of Credit issued for the account of such Borrower shall not be affected by, among other things, the validity or genuineness of documents or of any endorsements thereon, even if such documents should in fact prove to be in any or all respects invalid, fraudulent or forged, or any dispute between or among such Borrower, any of its Affiliates, the beneficiary of any Letter of Credit or any financing institution or other party to whom any Letter of Credit may be transferred or any claims or defenses whatsoever of such Borrower or of any of its Affiliates against the beneficiary of any Letter of Credit or any such transferee. The Issuer shall not be liable for any error, omission, interruption or delay in transmission, dispatch or delivery of any message or advice, however transmitted, in connection with any Letter of Credit. Each Borrower agrees that any action taken or omitted by the Issuer or any Lender under or in connection with any Letter of Credit and the related drafts and documents, if done without gross negligence or willful misconduct, shall be binding upon such Borrower and shall not put the Issuer or any Lender under any liability to such Borrower. Nothing in this Section 2.21.7 is intended to limit the right of the applicable Borrower to make a claim against the Issuer for damages as contemplated by the proviso to the first sentence of Section 2.21.6 .

          2.21.8           Actions of Issuer . The Issuer shall be entitled to rely, and shall be fully protected in relying, upon any Letter of Credit, draft, writing, resolution, notice, consent, certificate, affidavit, letter, cablegram, telegram, facsimile, telex or teletype message, statement, order or other document believed by it to be genuine and correct and to have been signed, sent or made by the proper Person or Persons, and upon advice and statements of legal counsel, independent accountants and other experts selected by the Issuer. The Issuer shall be fully justified in failing or refusing to take any action under this Agreement unless it shall first have received such advice or concurrence of the Required Lenders as it reasonably deems appropriate or it shall first be indemnified to its reasonable satisfaction by the Lenders against any and all liability and expense which may be incurred by it by reason of taking or continuing to take any such action. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 2.21 , the Issuer shall in all cases be fully protected in acting, or in refraining from acting, under this Agreement in accordance with a request of the Required Lenders, and such request and any action taken or failure to act pursuant thereto shall be binding upon the Lenders and any future holder of a participation in any Letter of Credit.

          2.21.9           Indemnification . Each Borrower hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless each Lender, the Issuer and the Agent, and their respective directors, officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims and damages, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses which such Lender, the Issuer or the Agent may incur (or which may be claimed against such Lender, the Issuer or the Agent by any Person whatsoever) by reason of or in connection with the issuance, execution and delivery or transfer of or payment or failure to pay under any Letter of Credit issued for the account of such Borrower or any actual or proposed use of any such Letter of Credit, including any  claims, damages, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses

26
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

which the Issuer may incur by reason of or in connection with (i) the failure of any other Lender to fulfill or comply with its obligations to the Issuer hereunder (but nothing herein contained shall affect any right a Borrower may have against any defaulting Lender) or (ii) by reason of or on account of the Issuer issuing any Letter of Credit which specifies that the term "Beneficiary" included therein includes any successor by operation of law of the named Beneficiary, but which Letter of Credit does not require that any drawing by any such successor Beneficiary be accompanied by a copy of a legal document, satisfactory to the Issuer, evidencing the appointment of such successor Beneficiary; provided that no Borrower shall be required to indemnify any Lender, the Issuer or the Agent for any claims, damages, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses to the extent, but only to the extent, caused by (x) the willful misconduct or gross negligence of the Issuer in determining whether a request presented under any Letter of Credit issued by the Issuer for the account of such Borrower complied with the terms of such Letter of Credit or (y) the Issuer's failure to pay under any Letter of Credit issued for the account of such Borrower after the presentation to it of a request strictly complying with the terms and conditions of such Letter of Credit. Nothing in this Section 2.21.9 is intended to limit the obligations of any Borrower under any other provision of this Agreement.

          2.21.10          Lenders' Indemnification . Each Lender shall, ratably in accordance with its Pro Rata Share, indemnify the Issuer, its affiliates and its directors, officers, agents and employees (to the extent not reimbursed by the applicable Borrower) against any cost, expense (including reasonable counsel fees and disbursements), claim, demand, action, loss or liability (except such as result from such indemnitees' gross negligence or willful misconduct or the Issuer's failure to pay under any Letter of Credit after the presentation to it of a request strictly complying with the terms and conditions of such Letter of Credit) that such indemnitees may suffer or incur in connection with this Section 2.21 or any action taken or omitted by such indemnitees hereunder.

          2.21.11          Rights as a Lender . In its capacity as a Lender, the Issuer shall have the same rights and obligations as any other Lender.

ARTICLE III

YIELD PROTECTION; TAXES

          3.1      Yield Protection . If, on or after the date of this Agreement, the adoption of any law or any governmental or quasi-governmental rule, regulation, policy, guideline or directive (whether or not having the force of law), or any change in the interpretation or administration thereof by any governmental or quasi-governmental authority, central bank or comparable agency charged with the interpretation or administration thereof, or compliance by the Issuer, any other Lender or any applicable Lending Installation with any request or directive (whether or not having the force of law) of any such authority, central bank or comparable agency:

          (i)      subjects the Issuer, any other Lender or any applicable Lending Installation to any Taxes, or changes the basis of taxation of payments (other than with respect to Excluded Taxes) to the Issuer in respect of Letters of Credit or to any Lender in respect of its Eurodollar Loans or its participations in Letters of Credit, or

27
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          (ii)     imposes or increases or deems applicable any reserve, assessment, insurance charge, special deposit or similar requirement against assets of, deposits with or for the account of, or credit extended by, the Issuer, any other Lender or any applicable Lending Installation (other than reserves and assessments taken into account in determining the interest rate applicable to Eurodollar Advances), or

          (iii)    imposes any other condition the result of which is to increase the cost to the Issuer, any other Lender or any applicable Lending Installation of issuing or participating in Letters of Credit or making, funding or maintaining its Eurodollar Loans or reduces any amount receivable by the Issuer, any other Lender or any applicable Lending Installation in connection with Letters of Credit or its Eurodollar Loans, or requires the Issuer, any other Lender or any applicable Lending Installation to make any payment calculated by reference to the amount of Letters of Credit issued by it, the amount of its participations in Letters of Credit or the amount of Eurodollar Loans held or interest received by it, in each case by an amount deemed material by the Issuer or such other Lender, and the result of any of the foregoing is to increase the cost to the Issuer, such other Lender or such applicable Lending Installation of issuing or participating in Letters of Credit or making or maintaining its Eurodollar Loans or Commitment or to reduce the return received by the Issuer, such other Lender or such applicable Lending Installation in connection with such issuing or participating in Letters of Credit or its Eurodollar Loans or Commitment, then, within 15 days of demand by the Issuer or such other Lender, the applicable Borrower (or, if any of the foregoing is not attributable or allocable to a particular Borrower, PHI) shall pay the Issuer or such other Lender such additional amount or amounts as will compensate the Issuer or such Lender for such increased cost or reduction in amount received.

          3.2      Changes in Capital Adequacy Regulations . If the Issuer or another Lender determines the amount of capital required or expected to be maintained by the Issuer or such Lender, any Lending Installation of such Lender or any corporation controlling the Issuer or such Lender is increased as a result of a Change, then, within 15 days of demand by the Issuer or such Lender, the applicable Borrower (or, if the amount payable is not attributable or allocable to a particular Borrower, PHI) shall pay the Issuer or such Lender the amount necessary to compensate for any shortfall in the rate of return on the portion of such increased capital which the Issuer or such Lender determines is attributable to this Agreement, Loans or Letters of Credit outstanding hereunder (or participations therein) or its Commitment to make Loans or to issue or participate in Letters of Credit hereunder (after taking into account such Lender's policies as to capital adequacy). " Change " means (i) any change after the date of this Agreement in the Risk Based Capital Guidelines (as defined below) or (ii) any adoption of or change in any other law, governmental or quasi-governmental rule, regulation, policy, guideline, interpretation, or directive (whether or not having the force of law) after the date of this Agreement which affects the amount of capital required or expected to be maintained by the Issuer, any other Lender or any Lending Installation or any corporation controlling the Issuer or any other Lender. " Risk Based Capital Guidelines " means (i) the risk based capital guidelines in effect in the United States on the date of this Agreement, including transition rules, and (ii) the corresponding capital regulations promulgated by regulatory authorities outside the United States implementing the July 1988 report of the Basle Committee on Banking Regulation and Supervisory Practices Entitled " International Convergence of Capital Measurements and Capital Standards ," including transition rules, and any amendments to such regulations adopted prior to the date of this Agreement.

28
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          3.3      Availability of Types of Advances . If any Lender notifies the Agent that maintenance of its Eurodollar Loans at a suitable Lending Installation would violate any applicable law, rule, regulation, or directive, whether or not having the force of law, or if the Required Lenders determine that (i) deposits of a type and maturity appropriate to match fund Eurodollar Advances are not available or (ii) the interest rate applicable to Eurodollar Advances does not accurately reflect the cost of making or maintaining Eurodollar Advances, then the Agent shall suspend the availability of Eurodollar Advances and require any affected Eurodollar Advances to be repaid or converted to Floating Rate Advances, subject to the payment of any funding indemnification amounts required by Section 3.4 .

          3.4      Funding Indemnification . If any payment of a Eurodollar Advance occurs on a day which is not the last day of an Interest Period therefor, whether because of acceleration, prepayment or otherwise, or a Eurodollar Advance is not made on the date specified by a Borrower for any reason other than default by the Lenders, the applicable Borrower will indemnify each Lender for any loss or cost incurred by it resulting therefrom, including any loss or cost in liquidating or employing deposits acquired to fund or maintain such Eurodollar Advance.

          3.5      Taxes .

          (i)       All payments by the Borrowers to or for the account of the Issuer, any other Lender or the Agent hereunder or under any Note shall be made free and clear of and without deduction for any and all Taxes. If a Borrower shall be required by law to deduct any Taxes from or in respect of any sum payable hereunder to the Issuer, any other Lender or the Agent, (a) the sum payable shall be increased as necessary so that after making all required deductions (including deductions applicable to additional sums payable under this Section 3.5 ), the Issuer, such Lender or the Agent (as the case may be) receives an amount equal to the sum it would have received had no such deductions been made, (b) such Borrower shall make such deductions, (c) such Borrower shall pay the full amount deducted to the relevant authority in accordance with applicable law and (d) such Borrower shall furnish to the Agent the original copy of a receipt evidencing payment thereof within 30 days after such payment is made.

          (ii)      In addition, each Borrower hereby agrees to pay any present or future stamp or documentary taxes and any other excise or property taxes, charges or similar levies which arise from any payment made by it hereunder or under any Note or Letter of Credit Application or from its execution or delivery of, or otherwise attributable to such Borrower in connection with, this Agreement, any Note or any Letter of Credit Application (" Other Taxes ").

          (iii)     Each Borrower hereby agrees to indemnify the Issuer, each other Lender and the Agent for the full amount of Taxes or Other Taxes (including any Taxes or Other Taxes imposed on amounts payable under this Section 3.5 ) paid by the Issuer, such Lender or the Agent and any liability (including penalties, interest and expenses) arising therefrom or with respect thereto. Payments due under this indemnification shall be made within 30 days of the date the Issuer, such Lender or the Agent makes demand therefor pursuant to Section 3.6 .

          (iv)      Each Lender that is not incorporated under the laws of the United States of America or a  state  thereof  (each  a " Non-U.S. Lender ")  agrees  that  it  will,  not  less  than ten

29
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Business Days after the date of this Agreement, (i) deliver to each Borrower and the Agent two duly completed copies of United States Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN or W-8ECI certifying in either case that such Lender is entitled to receive payments under this Agreement without deduction or withholding of any United States federal income taxes, and (ii) deliver to each Borrower and the Agent a United States Internal Revenue Form W-8BEN or W-9, as the case may be, and certify that it is entitled to an exemption from United States backup withholding tax. Each Non-U.S. Lender further undertakes to deliver to each Borrower and the Agent (x) renewals or additional copies of such form (or any successor form) on or before the date that such form expires or becomes obsolete, and (y) after the occurrence of any event requiring a change in the most recent forms so delivered by it, such additional forms or amendments thereto as may be reasonably requested by any Borrower or the Agent. All forms or amendments described in the preceding sentence shall certify that such Lender is entitled to receive payments under this Agreement without deduction or withholding of any United States federal income taxes, unless an event (including any change in treaty, law or regulation) has occurred prior to the date on which any such delivery would otherwise be required which renders all such forms inapplicable or which would prevent such Lender from duly completing and delivering any such form or amendment with respect to it and such Lender advises the Borrowers and the Agent that it is not capable of receiving payments without any deduction or withholding of United States federal income tax.

          (v)       For any period during which a Non-U.S. Lender has failed to provide a Borrower with an appropriate form pursuant to clause (iv) above (unless such failure is due to a change in treaty, law or regulation, or any change in the interpretation or administration thereof by any governmental authority, occurring subsequent to the date on which a form originally was required to be provided), such Borrower shall not be required to increase any amount payable to such Non-U.S. Lender pursuant to Section 3.5(i)(a) or to otherwise indemnify such Lender under this Section 3.5 with respect to Taxes imposed by the United States; provided that, should a Non-U.S. Lender which is otherwise exempt from or subject to a reduced rate of withholding tax become subject to Taxes because of its failure to deliver a form required under clause (iv) above, the applicable Borrower shall take such steps as such Non-U.S. Lender shall reasonably request to assist such Non-U.S. Lender to recover such Taxes.

          (vi)      Any Lender that is entitled to an exemption from or reduction of withholding tax with respect to payments under this Agreement or any Note pursuant to the law of any relevant jurisdiction or any treaty shall deliver to the Borrowers (with a copy to the Agent), at the time or times prescribed by applicable law, such properly completed and executed documentation prescribed by applicable law as will permit such payments to be made without withholding or at a reduced rate.

          (vii)     If the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental authority of the United States or any other country or any political subdivision thereof asserts a claim that the Agent did not properly withhold tax from amounts paid to or for the account of any Lender (because the appropriate form was not delivered or properly completed, because such Lender failed to notify the Agent of a change in circumstances which rendered its exemption from withholding ineffective, or for any other reason), such Lender shall indemnify the Agent fully for all amounts paid, directly or indirectly, by the Agent as tax, withholding therefor, or otherwise, including  penalties and  interest,  and including  taxes imposed  by any  jurisdiction  on amounts

30
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

payable to the Agent under this subsection, together with all costs and expenses related thereto (including attorneys fees and time charges of attorneys for the Agent, which attorneys may be employees of the Agent). The obligations of the Lenders under this Section 3.5(vii) shall survive the payment of the Obligations and termination of this Agreement.

          3.6      Mitigation of Circumstances; Lender Statements; Survival of Indemnity . Each Lender shall promptly notify the Borrowers and the Agent of any event of which it has knowledge which will result in, and will use reasonable commercial efforts available to it (and not, in such Lender's good faith judgment, otherwise disadvantageous to such Lender) to mitigate or avoid, (i) any obligation of any Borrower to pay any amount pursuant to Section 3.1 , 3.2 or 3.5 and (ii) the unavailability of Eurodollar Advances under Section 3.3 (and, if any Lender has given notice of any such event described above and thereafter such event ceases to exist, such Lender shall promptly so notify the Borrowers and the Agent). Without limiting the foregoing, each Lender shall, to the extent reasonably possible, designate an alternate Lending Installation with respect to its Eurodollar Loans to reduce any liability of any Borrower to such Lender under Sections 3.1 , 3.2 and 3.5 or to avoid the unavailability of Eurodollar Advances under Section 3.3 , so long as such designation is not, in the judgment of such Lender, disadvantageous to such Lender. Any Lender claiming compensation under Section 3.1 , 3.2 , 3.4 , or 3.5 shall deliver a written statement to the applicable Borrower (with a copy to the Agent) as to the amount due under the applicable Section, which statement shall set forth in reasonable detail the calculations upon which such Lender determined such amount and shall be final, conclusive and binding on such Borrower in the absence of manifest error. Determination of amounts payable under any such Section in connection with a Eurodollar Loan shall be calculated as though each Lender funded its Eurodollar Loan through the purchase of a deposit of the type and maturity corresponding to the deposit used as a reference in determining the Eurodollar Rate applicable to such Loan, whether in fact that is the case or not. Unless otherwise provided herein, the amount specified in the written statement of any Lender shall be payable on demand after receipt by the applicable Borrower of such written statement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article III , if any Lender fails to notify a Borrower of any event or circumstance which will entitle such Lender to compensation from such Borrower pursuant to Section 3.1 , 3.2 or 3.5 within 60 days after such Lender obtains knowledge of such event or circumstance, then such Borrower will not be responsible for any such compensation arising prior to the 60th day before such Borrower receives notice from such Lender of such event or circumstance. The obligations of the Borrowers under Sections 3.1 , 3.2 , 3.4 and 3.5 shall survive payment of the Obligations and termination of this Agreement.

          3.7      Replacement of Lender . If any Lender makes a demand for compensation under Section 3.1 , 3.2 or 3.5 or a notice of the type described in Section 3.3 (any such Lender, an " Affected Lender "), then PHI may replace such Affected Lender as a party to this Agreement with one or more other Lenders and/or Purchasers which are willing to accept an assignment from such Lender, and upon notice from PHI such Affected Lender shall assign, without recourse or warranty, its Commitment, its Loans and all of its other rights and obligations hereunder to such other Lenders and/or Purchasers for a purchase price equal to the sum of the principal amount of the Loans so assigned, all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, such Affected Lender's ratable share of all accrued and unpaid fees, any amount payable pursuant to Section 3.4 as a result of such Affected Lender receiving payment of any Eurodollar Loan prior to the end of an Interest Period therefor (assuming for such purpose that receipt of payment pursuant to

31
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

such assignment constitutes payment of each outstanding Eurodollar Loan) and all other obligations owed to such Affected Lender hereunder.

ARTICLE IV

CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

          4.1      Initial Credit Extension . The effectiveness of this Agreement and the obligation of the Lenders (or, if applicable, the Issuer) to make the initial Credit Extension hereunder is subject to the conditions precedent that the Agent has received (a) evidence, reasonably satisfactory to the Agent, that (i) all obligations of the Borrowers under the Existing Credit Facilities (other than the Existing Letters of Credit) have been (or concurrently with the initial Credit Extension will be) paid in full; and (ii) all fees and (to the extent billed) expenses which are payable on or before the date of the initial Credit Extension to either Arranger, the Agent or any Lender hereunder or in connection herewith have been (or concurrently with the initial Credit Extension will be) paid in full; and (b) each of the following documents (with sufficient copies for each Lender):

          (i)       Copies of the articles or certificate of incorporation of each Borrower, together with all amendments thereto, certified by the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of such Borrower, and certificates of good standing, certified by the appropriate governmental officer in the jurisdiction(s) of incorporation of such Borrower.

          (ii)      Copies, certified by the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of each Borrower, of such Borrower's bylaws and of resolutions of its Board of Directors authorizing the execution, delivery and performance of the Loan Documents to which such Borrower is a party.

          (iii)     An incumbency certificate from each Borrower, executed by the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of such Borrower, which shall identify by name and title and bear the signatures of the officers of such Borrower authorized to sign the Loan Documents to which such Borrower is a party, upon which certificate the Agent and the Lenders shall be entitled to rely until informed of any change in writing by such Borrower.

          (iv)      A certificate, signed by an Authorized Officer of PHI, stating that on the date of the initial Credit Extension no Default or Unmatured Default has occurred and is continuing with respect to any Borrower.

          (v)       A written opinion of internal counsel to  PHI, substantially in the form of Exhibit D-1 .

          (vi)      A written opinion of internal counsel to PEPCO, substantially in the form of Exhibit D-2

          (vii)     A written opinion of internal counsel to DPL, substantially in the form of Exhibit D-3 .

          (viii)    A written opinion of internal counsel to ACE, substantially in the form of Exhibit D-4 .

32
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          (ix)      A written opinion of Covington & Burling, special New York counsel to the Borrowers, substantially in the form of Exhibit D-5 .

          (x)       Any Notes requested by a Lender pursuant to Section 2.15 payable to the order of such requesting Lender.

          (xi)      Copies of all governmental approvals, if any, necessary for any Borrower to enter into the Loan Documents to which it is a party and to obtain Credit Extensions hereunder.

          (xii)     Such other documents as any Lender or its counsel may reasonably request.

          4.2       Each Credit Extension . Neither the Lenders nor the Issuer shall be required to make any Credit Extension to any Borrower unless on the date of such Credit Extension:

          (i)       No Default or Unmatured Default with respect to such Borrower exists or will result from such Credit Extension.

          (ii)      The representations and warranties of such Borrower contained in Article V , (with the exception of the representations and warranties contained in Sections 5.5 , 5.7 . and 5.15 which shall only be made as of the Closing Date), are true and correct in all material respects as of the date of such Credit Extension except to the extent any such representation or warranty is stated to relate solely to an earlier date, in which case such representation or warranty shall have been true and correct in all material respects on and as of such earlier date.

          (iii)     After giving effect to such Credit Extension, such Borrower's Outstanding Credit Extensions will not exceed such Borrower's borrowing authority as allowed by Applicable Governmental Authorities.

          (iv)     All legal matters incident to the making of such Credit Extension shall be reasonably satisfactory to the Lenders and their counsel.

          Each request for a Credit Extension by a Borrower shall constitute a representation and warranty by such Borrower that the conditions contained in Sections 4.2(i) , ( ii ) and ( iii ) have been satisfied. Any Lender may require a duly completed compliance certificate in substantially the form of Exhibit A from the applicable Borrower as a condition to the making of a Credit Extension.

ARTICLE V

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

          Each Borrower represents and warrants to the Lenders that:

          5.1      Existence and Standing . Such Borrower is a corporation, and each of its Subsidiaries is a corporation, partnership or limited liability company, duly and properly incorporated or organized, as the case may be, validly existing and (to the extent such concept applies to such entity) in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction (or, if applicable, jurisdictions) of  incorporation  or  organization  and  has all  requisite  authority  to  conduct  its

33
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

business in each jurisdiction in which its business is conducted, except where failure to do so could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower.

          5.2      Authorization and Validity . Such Borrower has the power and authority and legal right to execute and deliver the Loan Documents to which it is a party and to perform its obligations thereunder. The execution and delivery by such Borrower of the Loan Documents to which it is a party and the performance of its obligations thereunder have been duly authorized by proper corporate proceedings, and the Loan Documents to which such Borrower is a party constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of such Borrower enforceable against such Borrower in accordance with their terms, except as enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights generally.

          5.3      No Conflict; Government Consent . Neither the execution and delivery by such Borrower of the Loan Documents to which it is a party, nor the consummation of the transactions therein contemplated, nor compliance with the provisions thereof, will violate (i) any law, rule, regulation, order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree or award binding on such Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or (ii) such Borrower's or any of its Subsidiary's articles or certificate of incorporation, partnership agreement, certificate of partnership, articles or certificate of organization, bylaws, or operating or other management agreement, as the case may be, or (iii) the provisions of any indenture, instrument or agreement to which such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries is a party or is subject, or by which it, or its Property, is bound, or conflict with or constitute a default thereunder, or result in, or require, the creation or imposition of any Lien in, of or on any Property of such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of any such indenture, instrument or agreement. Except for an appropriate order or orders of (a) in the case of PHI, PEPCO and DPL, of the SEC under PUHCA, (b) in the case of DPL, of the Virginia State Corporation Commission and (c) in the case of ACE, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, each of which has been issued and is in full force and effect (and copies of which have been delivered to the Agent), no order, consent, adjudication, approval, license, authorization, or validation of, or filing, recording or registration with, or exemption by, or other action in respect of any governmental or public body or authority (including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission), or any subdivision thereof, is required to be obtained by such Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries in connection with the execution and delivery by such Borrower of the Loan Documents to which it is a party, the borrowings and obtaining of Letters of Credit by such Borrower under this Agreement, the payment and performance by such Borrower of its Obligations or the legality, validity, binding effect or enforceability against such Borrower of any Loan Document to which such Borrower is a party; provided that each Borrower must obtain the applicable approvals described in Schedule 7 prior to obtaining Credit Extensions after any applicable date specified in Schedule 7 with respect to such Borrower; it being understood that the Borrowers may from time to time deliver to the Agent an amended Schedule 7 so long as no approval listed thereon was required to have been obtained on or prior to the date of delivery of such amended Schedule 7 .

          5.4      Financial Statements . The financial statements included in such Borrower's Public Reports were prepared in accordance with Agreement Accounting Principles and fairly present the consolidated financial condition and operations of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries at the dates thereof and the consolidated results of their operations for the periods then ended.

34
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          5.5      No Material Adverse Change . Since December 31, 2004, there has been no change from that reflected in the Public Reports in the business, Property, financial condition or results of operations of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole which could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower.

          5.6      Taxes . Such Borrower and its Subsidiaries have filed all United States federal tax returns and all other material tax returns which are required to be filed and have paid all taxes due pursuant to said returns or pursuant to any assessment received by such Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, except (a) such taxes, if any, as are being contested in good faith and as to which adequate reserves have been provided in accordance with Agreement Accounting Principles and (b) taxes and governmental charges (in addition to those referred to in clause (a) ) in an aggregate amount not exceeding $1,000,000. The charges, accruals and reserves on the books of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries in respect of any taxes or other governmental charges are adequate.

          5.7      Litigation and Contingent Obligations . Except as disclosed in the Public Reports, there is no litigation, arbitration, governmental investigation, proceeding or inquiry pending or, to the knowledge of such Borrower, threatened against or affecting such Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries which could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower or which seeks to prevent, enjoin or delay the making of any Loans. Other than any liability incident to any litigation, arbitration or proceeding which could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower, such Borrower has no material contingent obligations not provided for or disclosed in the Public Reports.

          5.8      Significant Subsidiaries . Schedule 3 contains an accurate list of all Significant Subsidiaries of such Borrower as of the Closing Date setting forth their respective jurisdictions of organization and the percentage of their respective capital stock or other ownership interests owned by such Borrower or other Subsidiaries of such Borrower. All of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock or other ownership interests of such Significant Subsidiaries have been (to the extent such concepts are relevant with respect to such ownership interests) duly authorized and issued and are fully paid and nonassessable.

          5.9      ERISA . Each Plan complies in all material respects with all applicable requirements of law and regulations, no Reportable Event has occurred with respect to any Plan, neither such Borrower nor any other member of the Controlled Group has withdrawn from any Plan or initiated steps to do so, and no steps have been taken to reorganize or terminate any Plan.

          5.10     Accuracy of Information . No written information, exhibit or report furnished by such Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries to the Agent or to any Lender in connection with the negotiation of, or compliance with the Loan Documents to which such Borrower is a party contained any material misstatement of fact or omitted to state a material fact or any fact necessary to make the statements contained therein not misleading.

          5.11     Regulation U . Neither such Borrower nor any of its Subsidiaries is engaged principally or as one of its primary activities in the business of extending credit for the purpose of purchasing or carrying any "margin stock" (as defined in Regulation U of the FRB).

35
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          5.12      Material Agreements . Neither such Borrower nor any Subsidiary thereof is in default in the performance, observance or fulfillment of any of the obligations, covenants or conditions contained in any agreement to which it is a party, which default could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower.

          5.13      Compliance With Laws . Such Borrower and its Subsidiaries have complied with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations, orders and restrictions of any domestic or foreign government or any instrumentality or agency thereof having jurisdiction over the conduct of their respective businesses or the ownership of their respective Property except for any failure to comply with any of the foregoing which could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower.

          5.14      Plan Assets; Prohibited Transactions . Such Borrower is not an entity deemed to hold "plan assets" within the meaning of 29 C.F.R. § 2510.3-101 of an employee benefit plan (as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA) which is subject to Title I of ERISA or any plan (within the meaning of Section 4975 of the Code).

          5.15      Environmental Matters . In the ordinary course of its business, the officers of such Borrower consider the effect of Environmental Laws on the business of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries, in the course of which they identify and evaluate potential risks and liabilities accruing to such Borrower and its Subsidiaries due to Environmental Laws. On the basis of this consideration, such Borrower has concluded that Environmental Laws are not reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower. Except as disclosed in the Public Reports, neither such Borrower nor any Subsidiary thereof has received any notice to the effect that its operations are not in material compliance with any of the requirements of applicable Environmental Laws or are the subject of any federal or state investigation evaluating whether any remedial action is needed to respond to a release of any toxic or hazardous waste or substance into the environment, which noncompliance or remedial action could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower.

          5.16      Investment Company Act . Neither such Borrower nor any Subsidiary thereof is an "investment company" or a company "controlled" by an "investment company", within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

          5.17      Public Utility Holding Company Act . PHI is a " holding company " within the meaning of PUHCA.

          5.18      Insurance . Such Borrower and its Significant Subsidiaries maintain insurance with financially sound and reputable insurance companies on all their Property of a character usually insured by entities in the same or similar businesses similarly situated against loss or damage of the kinds and in the amounts, customarily insured against by such entities, and maintain such other insurance as is usually carried by such entities.

          5.19      No Default . No Default or Unmatured Default exists.

          5.20      Ownership of Properties . As of the Closing Date, such Borrower and its Subsidiaries have valid title, free of all Liens other than those permitted by Section 6.12 , to all the Property reflected as owned by such Borrower and its Subsidiaries in the financial statements

36
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

of such Borrower referred to in Section 5.4 , other than Property used, sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of since such date (a) in the ordinary course of business or (b) which are not material to the business of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole.

          5.21      OFAC . None of the Borrowers, any Subsidiary of the Borrowers or any Affiliate of the Borrowers: (i) is a person named on the list of Specially Designated Nationals or Blocked Persons maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control available at http://www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/sdn/index.html, or as otherwise published from time to time; or (ii) is (A) an agency of the government of a country, (B) an organization controlled by a country, or (C) a person resident in a country that is subject to a sanctions program identified on the list maintained by OFAC and available at http://www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/sanctions/index.html, or as otherwise published from time to time, as such program may be applicable to such agency, organization or person; or (iii) derives more than 10% of its assets or operating income from investments in or transactions with any such country, agency, organization or person; and (iv) none of the proceeds from the loan will be used to finance any operations, investments or activities in, or make any payments to, any such country, agency, organization, or person.

ARTICLE VI

COVENANTS

          During the term of this Agreement, unless the Required Lenders shall otherwise consent in writing:

          6.1      Financial Reporting . Each Borrower will maintain, for itself and each of its Subsidiaries, a system of accounting established and administered in accordance with Agreement Accounting Principles, and furnish to the Agent (in such number of copies as the Agent may reasonably request):

          (i)      Within 100 days after the close of each of its fiscal years, an audit report, which shall be without a " going concern " or similar qualification or exception and without any qualification as to the scope of the audit, issued by independent certified public accountants of recognized national standing and reasonably acceptable to the Agent, prepared in accordance with Agreement Accounting Principles on a consolidated and consolidating basis (consolidating statements need not be certified by such accountants) for itself and its Subsidiaries, including balance sheets as of the end of such period, related profit and loss and reconciliation of surplus statements, and a statement of cash flows, accompanied by (a) any management letter prepared by said accountants, and (b) a certificate of said accountants that, in the course of their examination necessary for their certification of the foregoing, they have obtained no knowledge of any Default or Unmatured Default with respect to such Borrower, or if, in the opinion of such accountants, any such Default or Unmatured Default shall exist, stating the nature and status thereof; provided that if such Borrower is then a "registrant" within the meaning of Rule 1-01 of Regulation S-X of the SEC and required to file a report on Form 10-K with the SEC, a copy of such Borrower's annual report on Form 10-K (excluding the exhibits thereto, unless such exhibits are requested  under clause (viii) of this  Section) or  any successor form and a manually

37
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

executed copy of the accompanying report of such Borrower's independent public accountant, as filed with the SEC, shall satisfy the requirements of this clause (i) ;

          (ii)      Within 60 days after the close of the first three quarterly periods of each of its fiscal years, for itself and its Subsidiaries, either (i) consolidated and consolidating unaudited balance sheets as at the close of each such period and consolidated and consolidating profit and loss and reconciliation of surplus statements and a statement of cash flows for the period from the beginning of such fiscal year to the end of such quarter, all certified by its chief financial officer or (ii) if such Borrower is then a "registrant" within the meaning of Rule 1-01 of Regulation S-X of the SEC and required to file a report on Form 10-Q with the SEC, a copy of such Borrower's report on Form 10-Q for such quarterly period, excluding the exhibits thereto, unless such exhibits are requested under clause (viii) of this Section.

          (iii)     Together with the financial statements (or reports) required under Sections 6.1(i) and ( ii ), a compliance certificate in substantially the form of Exhibit A signed by an Authorized Officer of such Borrower showing the calculations necessary to determine such Borrower's compliance with Section 6.13 of this Agreement and stating that, to the knowledge of such officer, no Default or Unmatured Default with respect to such Borrower exists, or if any such Default or Unmatured Default exists, stating the nature and status thereof.

          (iv)      As soon as possible and in any event within 30 days after receipt by such Borrower, a copy of (a) any notice or claim to the effect that such Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries is or may be liable to any Person as a result of the release by such Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries, or any other Person of any toxic or hazardous waste or substance into the environment, and (b) any notice alleging any violation of any federal, state or local environmental, health or safety law or regulation by such Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, which, in either case, could be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower.

          (v)       In the case of PHI, promptly upon the furnishing thereof to its shareholders generally, copies of all financial statements, reports and proxy statements so furnished.

          (vi)      Promptly upon the filing thereof, copies of all registration statements and annual, quarterly, monthly or other regular reports which such Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries files with the SEC.

          (vii)     In the case of PHI, as soon as PHI obtains knowledge of an actual Change in Control or publicly disclosed prospective Change in Control, written notice of same, including the anticipated or actual date of and all other publicly disclosed material terms and conditions surrounding such proposed or actual Change in Control.

          (viii)     Such other information (including nonfinancial information) as the Agent or any Lender may from time to time reasonably request.

          Documents required to be delivered pursuant to clause (i) , ( ii ), ( v ) or ( vi ) above may be delivered electronically and, if so delivered, shall be deemed to have been delivered on the date (i) on which the applicable Borrower posts such documents, or provides a link thereto, on a website on the internet at a website address previously specified to the Agent and the Lenders; or

38
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(ii) on which such documents are posted on the applicable Borrower's behalf on IntraLinks or another relevant website, if any, to which each of the Agent and each Lender has access; provided that (i) upon request of the Agent or any Lender, the applicable Borrower shall deliver paper copies of such documents to the Agent or such Lender (until a written request to cease delivering paper copies is given by the Agent or such Lender) and (ii) the applicable Borrower shall notify (which may be by facsimile or electronic mail) the Agent and each Lender of the posting of any documents. The Agent shall have no obligation to request the delivery of, or to maintain copies of, the documents referred to above or to monitor compliance by any Borrower with any such request for delivery, and each Lender shall be solely responsible for requesting delivery to it or maintaining its copies of such documents.

          6.2      Use of Proceeds . Each Borrower will use the proceeds of the Advances to it for general corporate purposes. No Borrower will, nor will it permit any Subsidiary to, use any of the proceeds of the Advances to it to purchase or carry any "margin stock" (as defined in Regulation U of the FRB).

          6.3      Notice of Default . Each Borrower will give prompt notice in writing to the Lenders of the occurrence of any Default or Unmatured Default with respect to such Borrower (it being understood and agreed that no Borrower shall be required to make separate disclosure under this Section 6.3 of occurrences or developments which have previously been disclosed to the Lenders in any financial statement or other information delivered to the Lenders pursuant to Section 6.1 ).

          6.4      Conduct of Business . Each Borrower will, and will cause each of its Significant Subsidiaries (or, in the case of clause (ii) below, each of its Subsidiaries) to, (i) carry on and conduct its business in substantially the same manner and in substantially the same fields of enterprise as it is presently conducted and (ii) do all things necessary to remain duly incorporated or organized, validly existing and (to the extent such concept applies to such entity) in good standing as a domestic corporation, partnership or limited liability company in its jurisdiction of incorporation or organization, as the case may be, and maintain all requisite authority to conduct its business in each jurisdiction in which its business is conducted, except to the extent, in the case of all matters covered by this clause (ii) other than the existence of such Borrower, that failure to do so would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower.

          6.5      Taxes . Each Borrower will, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to, timely file complete and correct United States federal and applicable foreign, state and local tax returns required by law and pay when due all taxes, assessments and governmental charges and levies upon it or its income, profits or Property, except (a) those that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and with respect to which adequate reserves have been set aside in accordance with Agreement Accounting Principles and (b) taxes, governmental charges and levies (in addition to those referred to in clause (a) ) in an aggregate amount not exceeding $1,000,000.

          6.6      Insurance . Each Borrower will, and will cause each of its Significant Subsidiaries to, maintain with financially sound and reputable insurance companies insurance on all of its Property in such amounts and  covering such risks as is  consistent with  sound business practice,

39
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

and each Borrower will furnish to any Lender such information as such Lender may reasonably request as to the insurance carried by such Borrower and its Significant Subsidiaries.

          6.7     Compliance with Laws . Each Borrower will, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to, comply with all laws, rules, regulations, orders, writs, judgments, injunctions, decrees or awards to which it may be subject, including all Environmental Laws, where failure to do so could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower.

          6.8      Maintenance of Properties . Each Borrower will, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to, do all things necessary to (a) maintain, preserve, protect and keep its Property in good repair, working order and condition, and make all necessary and proper repairs, renewals and replacements so that its business carried on in connection therewith may be properly conducted at all times, where failure to do so could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower; and (b) keep proper books and records in which full and correct entries shall be made of all material financial transactions of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries.

          6.9      Inspection . Each Borrower will, and will cause each of its Significant Subsidiaries to, permit the Agent and the Lenders upon reasonable notice and at such reasonable times and intervals as the Agent or any Lender may designate by their respective representatives and agents, to inspect any of the Property, books and financial records of such Borrower and each such Significant Subsidiary, to examine and make copies of the books of accounts and other financial records of such Borrower and each such Significant Subsidiary, and to discuss the affairs, finances and accounts of such Borrower and each such Significant Subsidiary with, and to be advised as to the same by, their respective officers.

          6.10     Merger . No Borrower will, nor will it permit any of its Significant Subsidiaries to, merge or consolidate with or into any other Person, except that, so long as both immediately prior to and after giving effect to such merger or consolidation, no Default or Unmatured Default with respect to such Borrower shall have occurred and be continuing, (i) any Significant Subsidiary of a Borrower may merge with such Borrower or a wholly-owned Subsidiary of such Borrower and (ii) a Borrower may merge or consolidate with any other Person so long as such Borrower is the surviving entity.

          6.11     Sales of Assets . No Borrower will, nor will it permit any of its Subsidiaries to, lease, sell or otherwise dispose of any of its assets (other than in the ordinary course of business), or sell or assign with or without recourse any accounts receivable, except:

          (i)       Any Subsidiary of a Borrower may sell, transfer or assign any of its assets to such Borrower or another Subsidiary of such Borrower.

          (ii)      The sale, assignment or other transfer of accounts receivable or other rights to payment pursuant to any Securitization Transaction.

          (iii)     In the case of PHI, any Permitted PHI Asset Sale so long as, at the time thereof and immediately after giving effect thereto, no Default or Unmatured Default with respect to PHI exists.

40
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          (iv)      In the case of ACE, any Permitted ACE Asset Sale so long as, at the time thereof and immediately after giving effect thereto, no Default or Unmatured Default with respect to ACE exists.

          (v)       In the case of DPL, any Permitted DPL Asset Sale so long as, at the time thereof and immediately after giving effect thereto, no Default or Unmatured Default with respect of DPL exists.

          (vi)      So long as no Default or Unmatured Default exists or would result therefrom, the sale of Intangible Transition Property to a Special Purpose Subsidiary in connection with such Special Purpose Subsidiary's issuance of Nonrecourse Transition Bond Debt.

          (vii)      Any Borrower and its Subsidiaries may sell or otherwise dispose of assets so long as the aggregate book value of all assets sold or otherwise disposed of in any fiscal year of such Borrower (other than assets sold or otherwise disposed of in the ordinary course of business or pursuant to clauses (i) through ( vi ) above) does not exceed a Substantial Portion of the Property of such Borrower.

          6.12      Liens . No Borrower will, nor will it permit any of its Significant Subsidiaries to, create, incur, or suffer to exist any Lien in, of or on the Property of such Borrower or any such Significant Subsidiary, except:

          (i)        Liens for taxes, assessments or governmental charges or levies on its Property if the same shall not at the time be delinquent or thereafter can be paid without penalty, or are being contested in good faith and by appropriate proceedings and for which adequate reserves in accordance with Agreement Accounting Principles shall have been set aside on its books.

          (ii)       Liens imposed by law, such as carriers', warehousemen's and mechanics' liens and other similar liens arising in the ordinary course of business which secure payment of obligations not more than 90 days past due or which are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which adequate reserves shall have been set aside on its books.

          (iii)      Liens arising out of pledges or deposits under worker's compensation laws, unemployment insurance, old age pensions, or other social security or retirement benefits, or similar legislation.

          (iv)       Utility easements, building restrictions, zoning laws or ordinances and such other encumbrances or charges against real property as are of a nature generally existing with respect to properties of a similar character and which do not in any material way affect the marketability of the same or interfere with the use thereof in the business of such Borrower and its Significant Subsidiaries.

          (v)        Liens existing on the date hereof and described in Schedule 4 (including Liens on after-acquired property arising under agreements described in Schedule 4 as such agreements are in effect on the date hereof).

41
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          (vi)      Judgment Liens which secure payment of legal obligations that would not constitute a Default with respect to such Borrower under Article VII .

          (vii)     Liens on Property acquired by such Borrower or a Significant Subsidiary thereof after the date hereof, existing on such Property at the time of acquisition thereof (and not created in anticipation thereof), provided that in any such case no such Lien shall extend to or cover any other Property of such Borrower or such Significant Subsidiary, as the case may be.

          (viii)    Deposits and/or similar arrangements to secure the performance of bids, fuel procurement contracts or other trade contracts (other than for borrowed money), leases, statutory obligations, surety and appeal bonds, performance bonds and other obligations of a like nature incurred in the ordinary course of business by such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries.

          (ix)      Liens on assets of such Borrower and its Significant Subsidiaries arising out of obligations or duties to any municipality or public authority with respect to any franchise, grant, license, permit or certificate.

          (x)       Rights reserved to or vested in any municipality or public authority to control or regulate any property or asset of such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries or to use such property or asset in a manner which does not materially impair the use of such property or asset for the purposes for which it is held by such Borrower or such Significant Subsidiary.

          (xi)      Irregularities in or deficiencies of title to any Property which do not materially affect the use of such property by such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries in the normal course of its business.

          (xii)     Liens securing Indebtedness of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries incurred to finance the acquisition of fixed or capital assets, provided that (i) such Liens shall be created substantially simultaneously with the acquisition of such fixed or capital assets, (ii) such Liens do not at any time encumber any property other than the property financed by such Indebtedness, (iii) the principal amount of Indebtedness secured thereby is not increased and (iv) the principal amount of Indebtedness secured by any such Lien shall at no time exceed 100% of the original purchase price of such property at the time it was acquired.

          (xiii)    Any Lien on any property or asset of any corporation or other entity existing at the time such corporation or entity is acquired, merged or consolidated or amalgamated with or into such Borrower or any Significant Subsidiary thereof and not created in contemplation of such event.

          (xiv)    Liens arising out of the refinancing, extension, renewal or refunding of any Indebtedness secured by any Lien permitted by Section 6.12 (v) , ( vii ), ( xii ) or ( xiii ), provided that such Indebtedness is not increased and is not secured by any additional assets.

          (xv)     Rights of lessees arising under leases entered into by such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries as lessor, in the ordinary course of business.

          (xvi)    In the case of PHI and PEPCO, Permitted PEPCO Liens.

42
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          (xvii)   In the case of PHI and DPL, Permitted DPL Liens.

          (xviii)   In the case of PHI and ACE, Permitted ACE Liens.

          (xix)    In the case of PHI, Permitted PHI Liens.

          (xx)     Purchase money mortgages or other purchase money liens or conditional sale, lease-purchase or other title retention agreements upon or in respect of property acquired or leased for use in the ordinary course of its business by such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries.

          (xxi)    Liens granted by a Special Purpose Subsidiary to secure Nonrecourse Transition Bond Debt of such Special Purpose Subsidiary.

          (xxii)   Liens, in addition to those permitted by clauses (i) through ( xxi ), granted by PHI and its Subsidiaries (other than the Subsidiary Borrowers and their Subsidiaries) to secure Nonrecourse Indebtedness incurred after the date hereof, provided that the aggregate amount of all Indebtedness secured by such Liens shall not at any time exceed $200,000,000.

          (xxiii)  Other Liens, in addition to those permitted by clauses (i) through (xxii), securing Indebtedness or arising in connection with Securitization Transactions, provided that the sum (without duplication) of all such Indebtedness, plus the aggregate investment or claim held at any time by all purchasers, assignees or other transferees of (or of interests in) receivables and other rights to payment in all Securitization Transactions (excluding any Nonrecourse Transition Bond Debt), shall not at any time exceed (a) $700,000,000 for PHI and its Significant Subsidiaries, (b) $300,000,000 for PEPCO and its Significant Subsidiaries, (c) $300,000,000 for DPL and its Significant Subsidiaries and (d) $300,000,000 for ACE and its Significant Subsidiaries.

          6.13      Leverage Ratio . No Borrower will permit the ratio, determined as of the end of each of its fiscal quarters, of (i) the Total Indebtedness of such Borrower to (ii) the Total Capitalization of such Borrower to be greater than 0.65 to 1.0.

ARTICLE VI

DEFAULTS

          The occurrence of any one or more of the following events shall constitute a Default with respect to the Borrower(s) affected thereby (it being understood that (a) any Default with respect to a Subsidiary Borrower shall also be a Default with respect to PHI; and (b) any Default under Section 7.10 or 7.12 shall be a Default for all Borrowers):

          7.1      Representation or Warranty . Any representation or warranty made, or deemed made pursuant to Section 4.2 by or on behalf of such Borrower to the Issuer, the Lenders or the Agent under or in connection with this Agreement or any certificate or information delivered in connection with this Agreement or any other Loan Document to which such Borrower is a party shall be materially false on the date as of which made.

43
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          7.2      Nonpayment . Nonpayment of the principal of any Loan to such Borrower when due; nonpayment of any Reimbursement Obligation of such Borrower within one Business Day after the same becomes due; or nonpayment by such Borrower of any interest on any Loan to such Borrower, or of any facility fee, utilization fee, letter of credit fee or other obligation payable by such Borrower under any of the Loan Documents to which it is a party, within five days after the same becomes due.

          7.3      Certain Covenant Breaches . The breach by such Borrower of any of the terms or provisions of Section 6.2 , 6.4 (as to the existence of such Borrower), 6.10 , 6.11 , 6.12 or 6.13 .

          7.4      Other Breaches . The breach by such Borrower (other than a breach which constitutes a Default with respect to such Borrower under another Section of this Article VII ) of any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement which is not remedied within 15 days (or, in the case of Section 6.9 , five Business Days) after the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, the President, the Treasurer or any Assistant Treasurer of such Borrower obtains actual knowledge of such breach.

          7.5      Cross Default . Failure of such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries to pay when due any Indebtedness aggregating in excess of $50,000,000 (" Material Indebtedness "); or the default by such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries in the performance (beyond the applicable grace period with respect thereto, if any) of any term, provision or condition contained in any agreement under which any such Material Indebtedness was created or is governed, or any other event shall occur or condition exist, the effect of which default or event is to cause, or to permit the holder or holders of such Material Indebtedness to cause, such Material Indebtedness to become due prior to its stated maturity; or any Material Indebtedness of such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries shall be declared to be due and payable or required to be prepaid or repurchased (other than by a regularly scheduled payment) prior to the stated maturity thereof; or such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries shall not pay, or admit in writing its inability to pay, its debts generally as they become due.

          7.6      Voluntary Bankruptcy, etc . Such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries shall (i) have an order for relief entered with respect to it under the federal bankruptcy laws as now or hereafter in effect, (ii) make an assignment for the benefit of creditors, (iii) apply for, seek, consent to, or acquiesce in, the appointment of a receiver, custodian, trustee, examiner, liquidator or similar official for it or a Substantial Portion of its Property, (iv) institute any proceeding seeking an order for relief under the federal bankruptcy laws as now or hereafter in effect or seeking to adjudicate it a bankrupt or insolvent, or seeking dissolution, winding up, liquidation, reorganization, arrangement, adjustment or composition of it or its debts under any law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization or relief of debtors or fail to file an answer or other pleading denying the material allegations of any such proceeding filed against it, (v) take any corporate, partnership or limited liability company action to authorize or effect any of the foregoing actions set forth in this Section 7.6 or (vi) fail to contest in good faith any appointment or proceeding described in Section 7.7 .

          7.7      Involuntary Bankruptcy, etc . Without the application, approval or consent of such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries, a receiver, trustee, examiner, liquidator or similar official  shall  be  appointed  for  such  Borrower  or  any  of  its   Significant  Subsidiaries  or  a

44
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Substantial Portion of its Property, or a proceeding described in Section 7.6(iv) shall be instituted against such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries and such appointment continues undischarged or such proceeding continues undismissed or unstayed for a period of 30 consecutive days.

          7.8      Seizure of Property, etc . Any court, government or governmental agency shall condemn, seize or otherwise appropriate, or take custody or control of, all or any portion of the Property of such Borrower and its Significant Subsidiaries which, when taken together with all other Property of such Borrower and its Significant Subsidiaries so condemned, seized, appropriated, or taken custody or control of, constitutes a Substantial Portion of its Property.

          7.9      Judgments . Such Borrower or any of its Significant Subsidiaries shall fail within 60 days to pay, bond or otherwise discharge one or more (i) judgments or orders for the payment of money in excess of $50,000,000 (or the equivalent thereof in currencies other than U.S. Dollars) in the aggregate or (ii) nonmonetary judgments or orders which, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower, and, in any such case, there is a period of five consecutive days during which a stay of enforcement of such judgment(s) or order(s) is not in effect (by reason of pending appeal or otherwise).

          7.10    ERISA . (i) Any Person shall engage in any "prohibited transaction" (as defined in Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code) involving any Plan, (ii) any "accumulated funding deficiency" (as defined in Section 302 of ERISA), whether or not waived, shall exist with respect to any Plan or any Lien in favor of the PBGC or a Plan shall arise on the assets of any Borrower or any other member of the Controlled Group, (iii) a Reportable Event shall occur with respect to, or proceedings shall commence to have a trustee appointed, or a trustee shall be appointed, to administer or to terminate, any Single Employer Plan, which Reportable Event or commencement of proceedings or appointment of a trustee is, in the reasonable opinion of the Required Lenders, likely to result in the termination of such Plan for purposes of Title IV of ERISA, (iv) any other member of the Plan shall terminate for purposes of Title IV of ERISA, (v) any Borrower or any other member of the Controlled Group shall, or in the reasonable opinion of the Required Lenders is likely to, incur any liability in connection with a withdrawal from, or the insolvency or reorganization of, a Multiemployer Plan or (vi) any other event or condition shall occur or exist with respect to a Plan; and in each case referred to in clauses (i) through (vi) above, such event or condition, together with all other such events or conditions, if any, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to any Borrower.

          7/11    Unenforceability of Loan Documents . Any Loan Document shall cease to be in full force and effect (other than, in the case of a Note, as contemplated hereby), any action shall be taken by or on behalf of a Borrower to discontinue or to assert the invalidity or unenforceability of any of its obligations under any Loan Document, or any Borrower or any Person acting on behalf of a Borrower shall deny that such Borrower has any further liability under any Loan Document or shall give notice to such effect.

          7.12    Change in Control . Any Change in Control shall occur; or PHI shall fail to own, directly or indirectly, 100% of the Voting Stock of each Subsidiary Borrower.

45
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ARTICLE VIII

ACCELERATION, WAIVERS, AMENDMENTS AND REMEDIES

          8.1      Acceleration . If any Default described in Section 7.6 or 7.7 occurs with respect to a Borrower, the obligations of the Lenders (including the Issuer) to make Credit Extensions to such Borrower hereunder shall automatically terminate and the Obligations of such Borrower shall immediately become due and payable without any election or action on the part of the Agent or any Lender. If any other Default occurs with respect to a Borrower, the Required Lenders (or the Agent with the consent of the Required Lenders) may terminate or suspend the obligations of the Lenders (including the Issuer) to make Credit Extensions to such Borrower hereunder, or declare the Obligations of such Borrower to be due and payable, or both, whereupon such obligations of the Lenders (including the Issuer) shall terminate and/or the Obligations of such Borrower shall become immediately due and payable, without presentment, demand, protest or notice of any kind, all of which each Borrower hereby expressly waives.

          If, within 30 days after termination of the obligations of the Lenders to make Credit Extensions to any Borrower hereunder or acceleration of the maturity of the Obligations of any Borrower as a result of any Default (other than any Default as described in Section 7.6 or 7.7 ) with respect to such Borrower and before any judgment or decree for the payment of the Obligations due shall have been obtained or entered, the Required Lenders (in their sole discretion) shall so direct, the Agent shall, by notice to such Borrower, rescind and annul such termination and/or acceleration.

          8.2      Amendments . Subject to the provisions of this Article VIII , the Required Lenders (or the Agent with the consent in writing of the Required Lenders) and the Borrowers may enter into agreements supplemental hereto for the purpose of adding or modifying any provisions to this Agreement changing in any manner the rights of the Lenders or any Borrower hereunder or waiving any Default or Unmatured Default hereunder; provided that no such supplemental agreement shall, without the consent of all of the Lenders:

          (i)       Other than as provided in Section 2.4 , extend the final maturity of any Loan or Reimbursement Obligation or forgive all or any portion of the principal amount thereof, or reduce the rate or extend the time of payment of interest thereon or on any facility fees, utilization fees or letter of credit fees.

          (ii)      Reduce the percentage specified in the definition of Required Lenders.

          (iii)     Other than as provided in Section 2.2 and Section 2.4 , extend the Facility Termination Date for any Borrower, increase the amount of the Commitment of any Lender hereunder, increase any Sublimit or permit any Borrower to assign its rights under this Agreement.

          (iv)      Amend this Section 8.2 .

No amendment of any provision of this Agreement relating to the Agent shall be effective without the written consent of the Agent. No amendment of this Agreement relating to the Issuer shall be effective without the written consent of the Issuer. The Agent may waive payment of

46
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

the fee required under Section 12.3.2 without obtaining the consent of any other party to this Agreement.

          8.3      Preservation of Rights . No delay or omission of the Agent, the Issuer or the Lenders to exercise any right under the Loan Documents shall impair such right or be construed to be a waiver of any Default or Unmatured Default or an acquiescence therein, and the making of a Credit Extension notwithstanding the existence of a Default or Unmatured Default or the inability of the applicable Borrower to satisfy the conditions precedent to such Credit Extension shall not constitute any waiver or acquiescence. Any single or partial exercise of any such right shall not preclude other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, and no waiver, amendment or other variation of the terms, conditions or provisions of any Loan Document whatsoever shall be valid unless in writing signed by the parties required pursuant to Section 8.2 and then only to the extent in such writing specifically set forth. All remedies contained in the Loan Documents or by law afforded shall be cumulative and all shall be available to the Agent, the Issuer and the Lenders until the Obligations have been paid in full.

ARTICLE IX

GENERAL PROVISIONS

          9.1      Survival of Representations . All representations and warranties of the Borrowers contained in this Agreement shall survive the making of the Credit Extensions herein contemplated

          9.2      Governmental Regulation . Anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, no Lender shall be obligated to extend credit to any Borrower in violation of any limitation or prohibition provided by any applicable statute or regulation.

          9.3      Headings . Section headings in the Loan Documents are for convenience of reference only, and shall not govern the interpretation of any of the provisions of the Loan Documents.

          9.4      Entire Agreement . The Loan Documents embody the entire agreement and understanding among the Borrowers, the Agent and the Lenders and supersede all prior agreements and understandings among the Borrowers, the Agent and the Lenders relating to the subject matter thereof.

          9.5      Several Obligations, Benefits of this Agrement . The respective obligations of the Lenders hereunder are several and not joint and no Lender shall be the partner or agent of any other (except to the extent to which the Agent is authorized to act as such). The failure of any Lender to perform any of its obligations hereunder shall not relieve any other Lender from any of its obligations hereunder. This Agreement shall not be construed so as to confer any right or benefit upon any Person other than the parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and assigns, provided that the parties hereto expressly agree that each Arranger shall enjoy the benefits of the provisions of Sections 9.6 , 9.10 and 10.11 to the extent specifically set forth therein and shall have the right to enforce such provisions on its own behalf and in its own name to the same extent as if it were a party to this Agreement.

47
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          9.6      Expenses; Indemnification .

          (i)      PHI shall reimburse the Agent and each Arranger for all reasonable costs, internal charges and out of pocket expenses including reasonable expenses of and fees for attorneys for the Agent and each Arranger who are employees of the Agent or an Arranger and of a single outside counsel for all of the Agent and the Arrangers paid or incurred by the Agent or such Arranger in connection with the preparation, negotiation, execution, delivery, syndication, review, amendment, modification and administration of the Loan Documents. Each Borrower agrees to reimburse the Agent, the Arrangers and the Lenders for (A) all reasonable costs, internal charges and out of pocket expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and time charges of attorneys for the Agent, the Arrangers and the Lenders, which attorneys may be employees of the Agent, the Arrangers or a Lender) paid or incurred by the Agent, the Arrangers or any Lender in connection with the collection and enforcement of the Obligations of such Borrower under the Loan Documents (including in any "work-out" or restructuring of the Obligations of such Borrower resulting from the occurrence of a Default with respect to such Borrower) and (B) any civil penalty or fine assessed by OFAC against, and all reasonable costs and expenses (including reasonable counsel fees and disbursements) incurred in connection with defense thereof, by the Agent or any Lender as a result of conduct by any Borrower that violates a sanction enforced by OFAC.

          (ii)     Each Borrower agrees to indemnify the Agent, each Arranger, each Lender, their respective affiliates, and each of the directors, officers and employees of the foregoing Persons (collectively, the " Indemnified Parties ") against all losses, claims, damages, penalties, judgments, liabilities and reasonable expenses (including all reasonable expenses of litigation or preparation therefor whether or not any Indemnified Party is a party thereto) which any of them may pay or incur arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the other Loan Documents, the transactions contemplated hereby or the direct or indirect application or proposed application of the proceeds of any Credit Extension hereunder except to the extent that they are determined in a final non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Party seeking indemnification; provided that no Subsidiary Borrower shall have any obligation with respect to any of the foregoing to the extent allocable solely to PHI or another Subsidiary Borrower. The obligations of the Borrowers under this Section 9.6 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

          9.7      Numbers of Documents . All statements, notices, closing documents and requests hereunder shall be furnished to the Agent with sufficient counterparts so that the Agent may furnish one to each of the Lenders.

          9.8      Disclosure . The Borrowers and the Lenders hereby (i) acknowledge and agree that Wachovia and/or its Affiliates from time to time may hold investments in, make other loans to or have other relationships with the Borrowers and their Affiliates and (ii) waive any liability of Wachovia or any of its Affiliates to any Borrower or any Lender, respectively, arising out of or resulting from such investments, loans or relationships other than liabilities arising out of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Wachovia or its Affiliates.

          9.9      Severability of Provisions . Any provision in any Loan Document that is held to be inoperative,   unenforceable,  or  invalid  in   any  jurisdiction  shall,  as  to  that  jurisdiction,  be

48
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

inoperative, unenforceable, or invalid without affecting the remaining provisions in that jurisdiction or the operation, enforceability, or validity of that provision in any other jurisdiction, and to this end the provisions of all Loan Documents are declared to be severable.

          9.10    Nonliability of Lenders . The relationship between the Borrowers on the one hand and the Lenders and the Agent on the other hand shall be solely that of borrower and lender. None of the Agent, either Arranger or any Lender shall have any fiduciary responsibility to any Borrower. None of the Agent, either Arranger or any Lender undertakes any responsibility to any Borrower to review or inform such Borrower of any matter in connection with any phase of such Borrower's business or operations. Each Borrower agrees that none of the Agent, either Arranger or any Lender shall have liability to such Borrower (whether sounding in tort, contract or otherwise) for losses suffered by such Borrower in connection with, arising out of, or in any way related to, the transactions contemplated and the relationship established by the Loan Documents, or any act, omission or event occurring in connection therewith, unless it is determined in a final non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction that such losses resulted from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the party from which recovery is sought. None of the Agent, either Arranger or any Lender shall have any liability with respect to, and each Borrower hereby waives, releases and agrees not to sue for, any special, indirect or consequential damages suffered by such Borrower in connection with, arising out of, or in any way related to the Loan Documents or the transactions contemplated thereby.

          9.11    Limited Disclosure .

          (i)      None of the Agent, the Issuer nor any Lender shall disclose to any Person any Specified Information (as defined below) except to its, and its Affiliates', officers, employees, agents, accountants, legal counsel, advisors and other representatives who have a need to know such Specified Information in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. " Specified Information " means information that any Borrower has furnished or in the future furnishes to the Agent, the Issuer or any Lender in confidence, but does not include any such information that (a) is published in a source or otherwise becomes generally available to the public (other than through the actions of the Agent, the Issuer, any Lender or any of their Affiliates, officers, employees, agents, accountants, legal counsel, advisors and other representatives in violation of this Agreement) or that is or becomes available to the Agent, the Issuer or such Lender from a source other than a Borrower, (b) without duplication with clause (b) above, is otherwise a matter of general public knowledge, (c) that is required to be disclosed by law, regulation or judicial order (including pursuant to the Code), (d) that is requested by any regulatory body with jurisdiction over the Agent, the Issuer or any Lender, (e) that is disclosed to legal counsel, accountants and other professional advisors to the Agent, the Issuer or such Lender, in connection with the exercise of any right or remedy hereunder or under any Note or any suit or other litigation or proceeding relating to this Agreement or any Note or to a rating agency if required by such agency in connection with a rating relating to Credit Extensions hereunder, (f) that is disclosed to assignees or participants or potential assignees or participants who agree to be bound by the provisions of this Section 9.11 or (g) that is disclosed to any actual or prospective counterparty (or its advisors) to any swap or derivative transaction relating to any Borrower and its obligations who agrees to be bound by the provisions of this Section 9.11 .

49
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          (ii)     The provisions of this Section 9.11 supersede any confidentiality obligations of any Lender, the Issuer or the Agent relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby under any agreement between any Borrower and any such party.

          9.12    Nonreliance . Each Lender hereby represents that it is not relying on or looking to any margin stock (as defined in Regulation U of the FRB) for the repayment of the Credit Extensions provided for herein.

          9.13     Termination of Existing Credit Facilities . Lenders which are parties to the Existing Credit Facilities (and which constitute " Required Lenders " under and as defined in each of the Existing Credit Facilities) hereby waive any advance notice requirement for terminating the commitments under the Existing Credit Facilities, and the Borrowers and the applicable Lenders agree that the Existing Credit Facilities shall be terminated on the date hereof (except for any provisions thereof which by their terms survive termination thereof).

          9.14    USA PATRIOT ACT NOTIFICATION . The following notification is provided to the Borrowers pursuant to Section 326 of the USA Patriot Act of 2001, 31 U.S.C. Section 5318:

          IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT PROCEDURES FOR OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT. To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, Federal law requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account, including any deposit account, treasury management account, loan, other extension of credit or other financial services product. What this means for the Borrower: When a Borrower opens an account, if such Borrower is an individual, the Agent and the Lenders will ask for such Borrower's name, residential address, tax identification number, date of birth and other information that will allow the Agent and the Lenders to identify such Borrower, and, if a Borrower is not an individual, the Agent and the Lenders will ask for such Borrower's name, tax identification number, business address and other information that will allow the Agent and the Lenders to identify such Borrower. The Agent and the Lenders may also ask, if a Borrower is an individual, to see such Borrower's driver's license or other identifying documents, and, if the Borrower is not an individual, to see the Borrower's legal organizational documents or other identifying documents.

ARTICLE X

THE AGENT

          10.1      Appointment; Nature of Relationship . Wachovia is hereby appointed by each of the Lenders as its contractual representative (herein referred to as the " Agent ") hereunder and under each other Loan Document, and each of the Lenders irrevocably authorizes the Agent to act as the contractual representative of such Lender with the rights and duties expressly set forth herein and in the other Loan Documents. The Agent agrees to act as such contractual representative upon the express conditions contained in this Article X . Notwithstanding the use of the defined term " Agent ," it is expressly understood and agreed that the Agent shall not have any fiduciary responsibilities to any Lender by reason of this Agreement or any other Loan Document and that the Agent is merely acting as the contractual representative of the Lenders with  only  those  duties   as  are  expressly  set   forth  in  this  Agreement   and  the  other  Loan

50
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Documents. In its capacity as the Lenders' contractual representative, the Agent (i) does not hereby assume any fiduciary duties to any of the Lenders, (ii) is a "representative" of the Lenders within the meaning of Section 9-105 of the Uniform Commercial Code and (iii) is acting as an independent contractor, the rights and duties of which are limited to those expressly set forth in this Agreement and the other Loan Documents. Each of the Lenders hereby agrees to assert no claim against the Agent on any agency theory or any other theory of liability for breach of fiduciary duty, all of which claims each Lender hereby waives.

          10.2     Powers . The Agent shall have and may exercise such powers under the Loan Documents as are specifically delegated to the Agent by the terms of each thereof, together with such powers as are reasonably incidental thereto. The Agent shall have no implied duties to the Lenders, or any obligation to the Lenders to take any action hereunder or under any other Loan Document except any action specifically provided by the Loan Documents to be taken by the Agent.

          10.3     General Immunity . Neither the Agent nor any of its directors, officers, agents or employees shall be liable to any Borrower or any Lender for any action taken or omitted to be taken by it or them hereunder or under any other Loan Document or in connection herewith or therewith except to the extent such action or inaction is determined in a final non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to have arisen from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of such Person.

          10.4     No Responsibility for Loan Recitals etc . Neither the Agent nor any of its directors, officers, agents or employees shall be responsible for or have any duty to ascertain, inquire into, or verify (a) any statement, warranty or representation made in connection with any Loan Document or any borrowing hereunder; (b) the performance or observance of any of the covenants or agreements of any obligor under any Loan Document, including any agreement by an obligor to furnish information directly to each Lender; (c) the satisfaction of any condition specified in Article IV , except receipt of items required to be delivered solely to the Agent; (d) the existence or possible existence of any Default or Unmatured Default; or (e) the validity, enforceability, effectiveness, sufficiency or genuineness of any Loan Document or any other instrument or writing furnished in connection therewith. The Agent shall have no duty to disclose to the Lenders information that is not required to be furnished by a Borrower to the Agent at such time, but is voluntarily furnished by such Borrower to the Agent (either in its capacity as Agent or in its individual capacity).

          10.5     Action on Instructions of Lenders . The Agent shall in all cases be fully protected in acting, or in refraining from acting, hereunder and under any other Loan Document in accordance with written instructions signed by the Required Lenders (or, when expressly required hereunder, all of the Lenders), and such instructions and any action taken or failure to act pursuant thereto shall be binding on all of the Lenders. The Lenders hereby acknowledge that the Agent shall be under no duty to take any discretionary action permitted to be taken by it pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement or any other Loan Document unless it shall be requested in writing to do so by the Required Lenders. The Agent shall be fully justified in failing or refusing to take any action hereunder and under any other Loan Document unless it shall first be indemnified to its satisfaction by the Lenders pro rata against any and all liability, cost and expense that it may incur by reason of taking or continuing to take any such action.

51
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          10.6     Employment of Agents and Counsel . The Agent may execute any of its duties as Agent hereunder and under any other Loan Document by or through employees, agents and attorneys in fact and shall not be answerable to the Lenders, except as to money or securities received by it or its authorized agents, for the default or misconduct of any such agents or attorneys in fact selected by it with reasonable care. The Agent shall be entitled to advice of counsel concerning the contractual arrangement between the Agent and the Lenders and all matters pertaining to the Agent's duties hereunder and under any other Loan Document.

          10.7     Reliance on Documents; Counsel . The Agent shall be entitled to rely upon any Note, notice, consent, certificate, affidavit, letter, telegram, statement, paper or document believed by it to be genuine and correct and to have been signed or sent by the proper person or persons, and, in respect to legal matters, upon the opinion of counsel selected by the Agent, which counsel may be employees of the Agent.

          10.8     Agent's Reimbursement and Indemnification . The Lenders agree to reimburse and indemnify the Agent ratably in proportion to their respective Commitments (or, if the Commitments have been terminated, in proportion to their Commitments immediately prior to such termination) (i) for any amounts not reimbursed by any Borrower for which the Agent is entitled to reimbursement by such Borrower under the Loan Documents, (ii) for any other expenses incurred by the Agent on behalf of the Lenders, in connection with the preparation, execution, delivery, administration and enforcement of the Loan Documents (including for any expenses incurred by the Agent in connection with any dispute between the Agent and any Lender or between two or more of the Lenders) and (iii) for any liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, actions, judgments, suits, costs, expenses or disbursements of any kind and nature whatsoever which may be imposed on, incurred by or asserted against the Agent in any way relating to or arising out of the Loan Documents or any document delivered in connection therewith or the transactions contemplated thereby (including for any such amounts incurred by or asserted against the Agent in connection with any dispute between the Agent and any Lender or between two or more of the Lenders), or the enforcement of any of the terms of the Loan Documents or of any such other documents, provided that (i) no Lender shall be liable for any of the foregoing to the extent any of the foregoing is found in a final non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Agent and (ii) any indemnification required pursuant to Section 3.5(vii) shall, notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 10.8 , be paid by the relevant Lender in accordance with the provisions thereof. The obligations of the Lenders under this Section 10.8 shall survive payment of the Obligations and termination of this Agreement.

          10.9     Notice of Default . The Agent shall not be deemed to have knowledge or notice of the occurrence of any Default or Unmatured Default hereunder (except for failure of a Borrower to pay any amount required to be paid to the Agent hereunder for the account of the Lenders) unless the Agent has received written notice from a Lender or a Borrower referring to this Agreement, describing such Default or Unmatured Default and stating that such notice is a " notice of default ". In the event that the Agent receives such a notice, the Agent shall give prompt notice thereof to all Lenders.

          10.10   Rights as a Lender . In the event the Agent is a Lender, the Agent shall have the same  rights  and  powers  hereunder and  under  any  other Loan  Document with  respect  to  its

52
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Commitment, its Loans and its interest in the LC Obligations as any Lender and may exercise the same as though it were not the Agent, and the term " Lender " or " Lenders " shall, at any time when the Agent is a Lender, unless the context otherwise indicates, include the Agent in its individual capacity. The Agent and its Affiliates may accept deposits from, lend money to, and generally engage in any kind of trust, debt, equity or other transaction, in addition to those contemplated by this Agreement or any other Loan Document, with any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries in which such Borrower or such Subsidiary is not restricted hereby from engaging with any other Person. The Agent in its individual capacity is not obligated to remain a Lender.

          10.11     Lender Credit Decision . Each Lender acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the Agent, either Arranger or any other Lender and based on the financial statements prepared by the Borrowers and such other documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Agreement and the other Loan Documents. Each Lender also acknowledges that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Agent, either Arranger or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under this Agreement and the other Loan Documents.

          10.12     Successor Agent . The Agent may resign at any time by giving written notice thereof to the Lenders and PHI, such resignation to be effective upon the appointment of a successor Agent or, if no successor Agent has been appointed, forty-five days after the retiring Agent gives notice of its intention to resign. The Agent may be removed at any time with or without cause by written notice received by the Agent from the Required Lenders, such removal to be effective on the date specified by the Required Lenders. Upon any such resignation or removal, the Required Lenders shall have the right (with, so long as no Default or Unmatured Default exists with respect to any Borrower, the consent of PHI, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed) to appoint, on behalf of the Borrowers and the Lenders, a successor Agent. If no successor Agent shall have been so appointed by the Required Lenders within thirty days after the resigning Agent's giving notice of its intention to resign, then the resigning Agent may appoint, on behalf of the Borrowers and the Lenders, a successor Agent. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, the Agent may at any time without the consent of any Lender but with the consent of PHI, not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, appoint any of its Affiliates which is a commercial bank as a successor Agent hereunder. If the Agent has resigned or been removed and no successor Agent has been appointed, the Lenders may perform all the duties of the Agent hereunder and the Borrowers shall make all payments in respect of their respective Obligations to the applicable Lender and for all other purposes shall deal directly with the Lenders. No successor Agent shall be deemed to be appointed hereunder until such successor Agent has accepted the appointment. Any such successor Agent shall be a commercial bank having capital and retained earnings of at least $100,000,000. Upon the acceptance of any appointment as Agent hereunder by a successor Agent, such successor Agent shall thereupon succeed to and become vested with all the rights, powers, privileges and duties of the resigning or removed Agent. Upon the effectiveness of the resignation or removal of the Agent, the resigning or removed Agent shall be discharged from its duties and obligations hereunder and under the Loan Documents. After the effectiveness of the resignation or removal of an Agent, the provisions of this Article X shall continue in effect for the benefit of such Agent in respect of any actions taken or omitted to be taken by it while it was acting as the Agent hereunder and under the other Loan

53
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Documents. In the event that there is a successor to the Agent (by merger or resignation or removal), or the Agent assigns its duties and obligations to an Affiliate pursuant to this Section 10.12 , then the term " Prime Rate " as used in this Agreement shall mean the prime rate, base rate or other analogous rate of the new Agent. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 10.12 , the Agent may not be removed by the Required Lenders unless the Agent (in its individual capacity) is concurrently removed from its duties and responsibilities as the Issuer.

          10.13     Agent's Fee . The Borrowers agree to pay to each of the Agent and each Arranger, for the Agent's or such Arranger's own account, the fees agreed to by the Borrowers and the Agent or such Arranger, as applicable.

          10.14     Delegation to Affiliates . The Borrowers and the Lenders agree that the Agent may delegate any of its duties under this Agreement to any of its Affiliates. Any such Affiliate (and such Affiliate's directors, officers, agents and employees) which performs duties in connection with this Agreement shall be entitled to the same benefits of the indemnification, waiver and other protective provisions to which the Agent is entitled under Articles IX and X .

          10.15     Other Agents . None of the Lenders identified on the cover page or signature pages of this Agreement or otherwise herein as being the " Syndication Agent " or a " Documentation Agent " (collectively, the " Other Agents ") shall have any right, power, obligation, liability, responsibility or duty under this Agreement other than those applicable to all Lenders. Each Lender acknowledges that it has not relied, and will not rely, on any of the Other Agents in deciding to enter into this Agreement or in taking or refraining from taking any action hereunder or pursuant hereto.

ARTICLE XI

SETOFF; RATABLE PAYMENTS

          11.1     Setoff . In addition to, and without limitation of, any rights of the Lenders under applicable law, if any Borrower becomes insolvent, however evidenced, or any Default occurs with respect to such Borrower, any and all deposits (including all account balances, whether provisional or final and whether or not collected or available) and any other Indebtedness at any time held or owing by any Lender or any Affiliate of any Lender to or for the credit or account of such Borrower may be offset and applied toward the payment of the Obligations of such Borrower owing to such Lender, whether or not the Obligations, or any part thereof, shall then be due.

          11.2     Ratable Payments . If any Lender, whether by setoff or otherwise, has payment made to it upon the Outstanding Credit Extensions owed to it by any Borrower (other than payments received pursuant to Section 3.1 , 3.2 , 3.4 or 3.5 , payments received by Non-Consenting Lenders pursuant to Section 2.4, and payments made to the Issuer in respect of Reimbursement Obligations so long as the Lenders have not funded their participations therein) in a greater proportion than that received by any other Lender, such Lender agrees, promptly upon demand, to purchase a portion of the Outstanding Credit Extensions owed by such Borrower to the other Lenders so that after such purchase each Lender will hold its ratable proportion of all of  such Borrower's Outstanding  Credit Extensions.  If any Lender, whether in

54
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

connection with setoff or amounts which might be subject to setoff or otherwise, receives collateral or other protection for the Outstanding Credit Extensions owed by it to any Borrower or such amounts which may be subject to setoff, such Lender agrees, promptly upon demand, to take such action necessary such that all Lenders share in the benefits of such collateral ratably in proportion to the Outstanding Credit Extensions owed to each of them by such Borrower. In case any such payment is disturbed by legal process, or otherwise, appropriate further adjustments shall be made.

ARTICLE XII

BENEFIT OF AGREEMENT; ASSIGNMENTS; PARTICIPATIONS

          12.1      Successors and Assigns . The terms and provisions of the Loan Documents shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Borrowers and the Lenders and their respective successors and assigns, except that (i) no Borrower shall have the right to assign its rights or obligations under the Loan Documents and (ii) any assignment by any Lender must be made in compliance with Section 12.3 . The parties to this Agreement acknowledge that clause (ii) of the preceding sentence relates only to absolute assignments and does not prohibit assignments creating security interests, including any pledge or assignment by any Lender of all or any portion of its rights under this Agreement and any Note to a Federal Reserve Bank; provided that no such pledge or assignment creating a security interest shall release the transferor Lender from its obligations hereunder unless and until the parties thereto have complied with the provisions of Section 12.3 . The Agent may treat the Person which made any Loan or which holds any Note as the owner thereof for all purposes hereof unless and until such Person complies with Section 12.3 ; provided that the Agent may in its discretion (but shall not be required to) follow instructions from the Person which made any Loan or which holds any Note to direct payments relating to such Loan or Note to another Person. Any assignee of the rights to any Loan or any Note agrees by acceptance of such assignment to be bound by all the terms and provisions of the Loan Documents. Any request, authority or consent of any Person, who at the time of making such request or giving such authority or consent is the owner of the rights to any Loan (whether or not a Note has been issued in evidence thereof), shall be conclusive and binding on any subsequent holder or assignee of the rights to such Loan.

          12.2      Participations .

          12.2.1      Permitted Participants; Effect . Upon giving notice to but without obtaining the consent of any Borrower, any Lender may, in the ordinary course of its business and in accordance with applicable law, at any time sell to one or more banks or other entities (" Participants ") participating interests in any Obligations owing to such Lender, any Note held by such Lender, any Commitment of such Lender or any other interest of such Lender under the Loan Documents. In the event of any such sale by a Lender of participating interests to a Participant, such Lender's obligations under the Loan Documents shall remain unchanged, such Lender shall remain solely responsible to the other parties hereto for the performance of such obligations, such Lender shall remain the owner of the Obligations owing to such Lender and the holder of any Note issued to it for all purposes under the Loan Documents, all amounts payable by each Borrower under this Agreement shall be determined as if such Lender had not sold such participating interests,  and the Borrowers, the Issuer and  the Agent  shall continue to deal solely

55
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

and directly with such Lender in connection with such Lender's rights and obligations under the Loan Documents.

          12.2.2       Voting Rights . Each Lender shall retain the sole right to approve, without the consent of any Participant, any amendment, modification or waiver of any provision of the Loan Documents other than any amendment, modification or waiver which extends the Facility Termination Date for any Borrower or the final maturity of any Loan or Reimbursement Obligation in which such Participant has an interest or forgives all or any portion of the principal amount thereof, or reduces the rate or extends the time of payment of interest thereon or on any facility fees, utilization fees or letter of credit fees.

          12.2.3       Benefit of Setoff . The Borrowers agree that each Participant shall be deemed to have the right of setoff provided in Section 11.1 in respect of its participating interest in amounts owing under the Loan Documents to the same extent as if the amount of its participating interest were owing directly to it as a Lender under the Loan Documents, provided that each Lender shall retain the right of setoff provided in Section 11.1 with respect to the amount of participating interests sold to each Participant. The Lenders agree to share with each Participant, and each Participant, by exercising the right of setoff provided in Section 11.1 , agrees to share with each Lender, any amount received pursuant to the exercise of its right of setoff, such amounts to be shared in accordance with Section 11.2 as if each Participant were a Lender.

          12.3      Assignments .

          12.3.1      Permitted Assignments . Any Lender may, in the ordinary course of its business and in accordance with applicable law, at any time assign to one or more banks or other entities (" Purchasers ") all or any part of its rights and obligations under the Loan Documents. Such assignment shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit B or in such other form as may be agreed to by the parties thereto. The consent of PHI and the Agent shall be required prior to an assignment becoming effective with respect to a Purchaser which is not a Lender or an Affiliate thereof; provided that if a Default exists with respect to any Borrower, the consent of PHI shall not be required. Any such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Each such assignment with respect to a Purchaser which is not a Lender or an Affiliate thereof shall (unless each of PHI and the Agent otherwise consent) be in an amount not less than the lesser of (i) $5,000,000 or (ii) the remaining amount of the assigning Lender's Commitment (calculated as at the date of such assignment) or outstanding Loans and participations in LC Obligations (to the extent such Commitment has been terminated). Each assignment shall be of a constant, and not a varying, percentage of all of the assigning Lender's interests in the Obligations of, and Commitment to, all Borrowers.

          12.3.2      Effect; Effective Date . Upon (i) delivery to the Agent of an Assignment Agreement, together with any consents required by Section 12.3.1 , and (ii) payment of a $3,500 fee to the Agent for processing such assignment (unless such fee is waived by the Agent), such Assignment Agreement shall become effective on the effective date specified in such Assignment Agreement. On and after the effective date of such Assignment Agreement, such Purchaser shall for all purposes be a Lender party to this Agreement and any other Loan Document executed by or on behalf of the Lenders and shall have all the rights and obligations of a Lender under the Loan Documents,  to the same extent  as if it were an original party hereto,

56
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

and no further consent or action by the Borrowers, the Lenders or the Agent shall be required to release the transferor Lender with respect to the percentage of the Aggregate Commitment and Obligations assigned to such Purchaser. Any Person that is at any time a Lender and that thereafter ceases to be a Lender pursuant to the terms of this Section 12.3.2 shall continue to be entitled to the benefit of those provisions of this Agreement that, pursuant to the terms hereof, survive the termination hereof. Upon the consummation of any assignment to a Purchaser pursuant to this Section 12.3.2 , the transferor Lender, the Agent and the Borrowers shall, if the transferor Lender or the Purchaser desires that its Loans be evidenced by Notes, make appropriate arrangements so that new Notes or, as appropriate, replacement Notes are issued to such transferor Lender and new Notes or, as appropriate, replacement Notes, are issued to such Purchaser.

          12.4     Dissemination of Information . The Borrowers authorize each Lender to disclose to any Participant or Purchaser or any other Person acquiring an interest in the Loan Documents by operation of law (each a " Transferee ") and any prospective Transferee any and all information in such Lender's possession concerning the creditworthiness of the Borrowers and their respective Subsidiaries, including any information contained in any Public Reports; provided that each Transferee and prospective Transferee agrees to be bound by Section 9.11 of this Agreement.

          12.5     Grant of Funding Option to SPC . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, any Lender (a " Granting Lender ") may grant to a special purpose funding vehicle (an " SPC "), identified as such in writing from time to time by the Granting Lender to the Agent and PHI, the option to provide to any Borrower all or any part of any Loan that such Granting Lender would otherwise be obligated to make to such Borrower pursuant to this Agreement; provided that (i) nothing herein shall constitute a commitment by any SPC to make any Loan and (ii) if an SPC elects not to exercise such option or otherwise fails to provide all or any part of such Loan, the Granting Lender shall be obligated to make such Loan pursuant to the terms hereof. The making of a Loan by an SPC hereunder shall utilize the Commitment of the Granting Lender to the same extent, and as if, such Loan were made by such Granting Lender. Each party hereto agrees that no SPC shall be liable for any indemnity or similar payment obligation under this Agreement (all liability for which shall remain with the Granting Lender). In furtherance of the foregoing, each party hereto agrees (which agreement shall survive the termination of this Agreement) that, prior to the date that is one year and one day after the payment in full of all outstanding commercial paper or other senior indebtedness of any SPC, it will not institute against, or join any other Person in instituting against, such SPC any bankruptcy, reorganization, arrangement, insolvency or liquidation proceeding under the laws of the United States or any State thereof. In addition, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 12.5 , any SPC may (a) with notice to, but without the prior written consent of, PHI and the Agent and without paying any processing fee therefor, assign all or a portion of its interests in any Loan to the Granting Lender or to any financial institution (consented to by PHI and the Agent) providing liquidity and/or credit support to or for the account of such SPC to support the funding or maintenance of Loans and (b) disclose on a confidential basis any non-public information relating to its Loans to any rating agency, commercial paper dealer or provider of any surety, guarantee or credit or liquidity enhancement to such SPC.

57
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          12.6     Tax Treatment . If any interest in any Loan Document is transferred to any Transferee which is organized under the laws of any jurisdiction other than the United States or any State thereof, the transferor Lender shall cause such Transferee, concurrently with the effectiveness of such transfer, to comply with the provisions of Section 3.5(iv) .

ARTICLE XIII

NOTICES

          13.1      Notices . (a) Except as otherwise permitted by Section 2.16 , all notices, requests and other communications to any party hereunder shall be in writing (including facsimile transmission or electronic mail or posting on a website) and shall, subject to the last paragraph of Section 6.1 , be given to such party at (i) in the case of any Borrower or the Agent, its address, facsimile number or electronic mail address set forth below or such other address, facsimile number or electronic mail address as it may hereafter specify for such purpose by notice to the other parties hereto; and (ii) in the case of any Lender, at the address, facsimile number or electronic mail address set forth on Schedule 2 or such other address, facsimile number or electronic mail address as such Lender may hereafter specify for such purpose by notice to the Borrowers and the Agent. Subject to the last paragraph of Section 6.1 , each such notice, request or other communication shall be effective (i) if given by facsimile transmission, when transmitted to the facsimile number specified pursuant to this Section and confirmation of receipt is received, (ii) if given by mail, three Business Days after such communication is deposited in the mails with first class postage prepaid, addressed as aforesaid, or (iii) if given by any other means, when delivered (or, in the case of electronic mail, received) at the address specified pursuant to this Section; provided that notices to the Agent under Article II shall not be effective until received.

                    (b)Notices to any party shall be sent to it at the following addresses, or any other address as to which all the other parties are notified in writing.

 

If to the Borrowers:

Pepco Holdings, Inc.
701 Ninth Street NW
Fifth Floor
Washington, DC 20068
Attention: Anthony J. Kamerick
Telephone: (202) 872-2056
Fax: (202) 872-3015
E-mail: tjkamerick@pepco.com

 

If to Wachovia as Agent:

Wachovia Bank, National Association
Charlotte Plaza, CP-8
201 South College Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28288-0680
Attention: Syndication Agency Services
Telephone No.: (704) 374-2698
Telecopy No.: (704) 383-0288

58
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

With copies to: (other than Borrowing Notices, Conversion/ Continuation Notices and other similar funding notices)

Wachovia Bank, National Association
One Wachovia Center, 6 th Floor
301 South College Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28288-0760
Attention: Larry Sullivan
Telephone No.: (704) 715-1794
Telecopy No.: (704) 374-4793
E-mail: larry.sullivan@wachovia.com

          13.2     Notices to and by Subsidiary Borrowers . Each Subsidiary Borrower (a) authorizes PHI to send and receive notices on behalf of such Subsidiary Borrower hereunder and (b) irrevocably agrees that any notice to PHI which is effective pursuant to Section 13.1 shall be conclusively deemed to have been received by such Subsidiary Borrower.

ARTICLE XIV

COUNTERPARTS

          This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one agreement, and any of the parties hereto may execute this Agreement by signing any such counterpart. This Agreement shall be effective when it has been executed by the Borrowers, the Agent and the Lenders and each party has notified the Agent by facsimile transmission or telephone that it has taken such action.

ARTICLE XV

CHOICE OF LAW; CONSENT TO JURISDICTION; WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL

          15.1      CHOICE OF LAW . THE LOAN DOCUMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL LAWS (INCLUDING SECTION 5.1401.7 OF THE GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW, BUT OTHERWISE WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CONFLICT OF LAWS PROVISIONS THEREOF) OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, BUT GIVING EFFECT TO FEDERAL LAWS APPLICABLE TO NATIONAL BANKS.

          15.2      CONSENT TO JURISDICTION . EACH BORROWER HEREBY IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE NON-EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF ANY UNITED STATES FEDERAL OR NEW YORK STATE COURT SITTING IN NEW YORK, NEW YORK IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO ANY LOAN DOCUMENT, AND EACH BORROWER HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AGREES THAT ALL CLAIMS IN RESPECT OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING MAY BE HEARD AND DETERMINED IN ANY SUCH COURT AND IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY OBJECTION IT MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE AS TO THE VENUE OF ANY SUCH SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING BROUGHT IN SUCH A COURT OR THAT SUCH COURT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM. NOTHING HEREIN SHALL LIMIT THE RIGHT OF THE AGENT OR ANY LENDER TO BRING PROCEEDINGS AGAINST A BORROWER IN THE COURTS OF ANY OTHER   JURISDICTION.     ANY   JUDICIAL  PROCEEDING   BY  A   BORROWER

59
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

AGAINST THE AGENT OR ANY LENDER OR ANY AFFILIATE OF THE AGENT OR ANY LENDER INVOLVING, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ANY MATTER IN ANY WAY ARISING OUT OF, RELATED TO, OR CONNECTED WITH ANY LOAN DOCUMENT SHALL BE BROUGHT ONLY IN A COURT IN NEW YORK, NEW YORK.

          15.3      WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL . THE BORROWERS, THE AGENT AND THE LENDERS HEREBY WAIVE TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY JUDICIAL PROCEEDING INVOLVING, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ANY MATTER (WHETHER SOUNDING IN TORT, CONTRACT OR OTHERWISE) IN ANY WAY ARISING OUT OF, RELATED TO, OR CONNECTED WITH ANY LOAN DOCUMENT OR THE RELATIONSHIP ESTABLISHED THEREUNDER.

[Signatures Follow]

60
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC.

 

By:  /s/ A. J. KAMERICK                             
       Name: Anthony J. Kamerick
       Title: Vice President and Treasurer

 

POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY

 

By:  /s/ A. J. KAMERICK                             
       Name: Anthony J. Kamerick
       Title: Vice President and Treasurer

 

DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

 

By:  /s/ A. J. KAMERICK                             
       Name: Anthony J. Kamerick
       Title: Vice President and Treasurer

 

ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY

 

By:  /s/ A. J. KAMERICK                             
       Name: Anthony J. Kamerick
       Title: Vice President

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Agent, Issuer and Lender

 

By:  /s/ LAWRENCE P. SULLIVAN      
       Name: Lawrence P. Sullivan
       Title:   Director

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

CITICORP USA, INC., as Syndication Agent and Lender

 

By:  /s/ RICHARD EVANS                                    
       Name: Richard Evans
       Title:   Vice President

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND, PLC,
as Documentation Agent and Lender

 

By:  /s/ EMILY FREEDMAN                           
       Name: Emily Freedman
       Title:  Vice President

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, as Documentation Agent and Lender

 

By:  /s/ THANE RATTEW                  
       Name: Thane Rattew
       Title:  Managing Director

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

JPMORGANCHASE BANK, N.A.,
as Documentation Agent and Lender

 

By:  /s/ THOMAS CASEY                 
       Name: Thomas Casey
       Title:  Vice President

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Lender

 

By:  /s/ SHERRIE I. MANSON               
       Name: Sherrie I. Manson
       Title:   Vice President

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

MERRILL LYNCH BANK USA, as Lender

 

By:  /s/ LOUIS ALDER                
       Name: Louis Alder
       Title:   Director

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

SUNTRUST BANK, as Lender

 

By:  /s/ MARK A. FLATIN          
       Name: Mark A. Flatin
       Title:  Managing Director

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON, as Lender

 

By:  /s/ CALDWELL                    
       Name: Brian T. Caldwell
       Title:  Director

 

By:    /s/ GR                                            
        Name: Gregory S. Richards
        Title:   Associate

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

MIZUHO CORPORATE BANK, LTD., as Lender

 

By:  /s/ MARK GRONICH         
       Name: Mark Gronich
       Title:  Senior Vice President

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI TRUST
COMPANY, as Lender

 

By:  /s/ ANDREW BERNSTEIN         
       Name: Andrew Bernstein
       Title: Assistant Vice President

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Lender

 

By:  /s/ JOHN WATT                             
       Name: John N. Watt
       Title:  Vice President

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

MORGAN STANLEY BANK, as Lender

 

By:  /s/ DANIEL TWENGE        
       Name: Daniel Twenge
       Title:  Vice President
               Morgan Stanley Bank

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY, as Lender

 

By:  /s/ WILLIAM KEEHN            
       Name: William Keehn
       Title:  Vice President

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

NORTHERN TRUST, as Lender

 

By:  /s/ KATHLEEN D. SCHURR         
       Name: Kathleen D. Schurr
       Title:  Vice President

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

RIGGS BANK, N.A., as Lender

 

By:  /s/ D. H. KLAMFOTH                  
       Name: Douglas H.Klamfoth
       Title:  Vice President

[Credit Agreement - Pepco Holdings, Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

SCHEDULE 1

PRICING SCHEDULE

 

Level I Status

Level II status

Level III

Status

Level iv Status

Level v Status

Level VI Status

Applicable Margin/LC Fee Rate

0.220%

0.300%

0.350%

0.425%

0.575%

0.800%

Facility Fee Rate

0.080%

0.100%

0.125%

0.150%

0.175%

0.200%

Utilization Fee Rate

0.100%

0.100%

0.125%

0.125%

0.125%

0.125%

          For the purposes of this Schedule, the following terms have the following meanings, subject to the other provisions of this Schedule:

          " Level I Status " exists with respect to any Borrower on any date if, on such date, such Borrower's Moody's Rating is A2 or better, such Borrower's S&P Rating is A or better or such Borrower's Fitch Rating is A or better.

          " Level II Status " exists with respect to any Borrower on any date if, on such date, (i) such Borrower has not qualified for Level I Status and (ii) such Borrower's Moody's Rating is A3 or better, such Borrower's S&P Rating is A- or better or such Borrower's Fitch Rating is A- or better.

          " Level III Status " exists with respect to any Borrower on any date if, on such date, (i) such Borrower has not qualified for Level I Status or Level II Status and (ii) such Borrower's Moody's Rating is Baa1 or better, such Borrower's S&P Rating is BBB+ or better or such Borrower's Fitch Rating is BBB+ or better.

          " Level IV Status " exists with respect to any Borrower on any date if, on such date, (i) such Borrower has not qualified for Level I Status, Level II Status or Level III Status and (ii) such Borrower's Moody's Rating is Baa2 or better, such Borrower's S&P Rating is BBB or better or such Borrower's Fitch Rating is BBB or better.

          " Level V Status " exists with respect to any Borrower on any date if, on such date, (i) such Borrower has not qualified for Level I Status, Level II Status, Level III Status or Level IV Status and (ii) such Borrower's Moody's Rating is Baa3 or better, such Borrower's S&P Rating is BBB- or better or such Borrower's Fitch Rating is BBB- or better.

          " Level VI Status " exists with respect to any Borrower on any date if, on such date, such Borrower has not qualified for Level I Status, Level II Status, Level III Status, Level IV Status or Level V Status.

SCH 1
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          " Fitch Rating " means, at any time for any Borrower, the ratings issued by Fitch Ratings and then in effect with respect to such Borrower's unsecured long-term debt securities without third-party credit enhancement.

          " Moody's Rating " means, at any time for any Borrower, the rating issued by Moody's and then in effect with respect to such Borrower's senior unsecured long term debt securities without third party credit enhancement.

          " S&P Rating " means, at any time for any Borrower, the rating issued by S&P and then in effect with respect to such Borrower's senior unsecured long term debt securities without third party credit enhancement.

          " Status " means Level I Status, Level II Status, Level III Status, Level IV Status, Level V Status or Level VI Status.

          For purposes of this Schedule, the Moody's Rating, the S&P Rating and the Fitch Ratings in effect for any Borrower on any date are that in effect at the close of business on such date.

          The Applicable Margin, the Facility Fee Rate, the LC Fee Rate and the Utilization Fee Rate for each Borrower shall be determined in accordance with the above based on such Borrower's Status as determined from its then current Moody's Rating, S&P Rating and Fitch Rating. If the applicable Borrower is split-rated and all three (3) ratings fall in different Levels, the Applicable Margin, the LC Fee Rate and the Facility Fee Rate shall be based upon the Level indicated by the middle rating. If the applicable Borrower is split-rated and two (2) of the ratings fall in the same Level, (the " Majority Level ") and the third rating is in a different Level, the Applicable Margin, the LC Fee Rate, Utilization Fee Rate and the Facility Fee shall be based upon the Majority Level.

SCH 1
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SCHEDULE 2

COMMITMENTS AND PRO RATA SHARES

Lender

Amount of   
Commitment

Pro Rata Share

Wachovia Bank, National Association

$ 110,000,000

9.16666666%

Citicorp USA, Inc.

$ 110,000,000

9.16666666%

The Royal Bank of Scotland, PLC

$ 90,000,000

7.50000000%

The Bank of Nova Scotia

$ 90,000,000

7.50000000%

JPMorganChase Bank, N.A.

$ 90,000,000

7.50000000%

KeyBank National Association

$ 75,000,000

6.25000000%

Merrill Lynch Bank USA

$ 75,000,000

6.25000000%

SunTrust Bank

$ 75,000,000

6.25000000%

Credit Suisse First Boston

$ 75,000,000

6.25000000%

Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

$ 75,000,000

6.25000000%

Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Trust Company

$ 75,000,000

6.25000000%

The Bank of New York

$ 60,000,000

5.00000000%

Morgan Stanley Bank

$ 50,000,000

4.16666667%

Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company

$ 50,000,000

4.16666667%

Northern Trust

$ 50,000,000

4.16666667%

Riggs Bank, N.A.

$ 50,000,000

4.16666667%

TOTAL:

$1,200,000,000

100%      

SCH 2
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

SCHEDULE 3

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

Name of Company Controlled

Owned By

Percent
Ownership

Potomac Electric Power Company
(a D.C. and Virginia corporation)

Pepco Holdings, Inc.

100%

Conectiv
(a Delaware corporation)

Pepco Holdings, Inc.

100%

Delmarva Power & Light Company
(a Delaware and Virginia corporation)

Conectiv

100%

Atlantic City Electric Company
(a New Jersey corporation)

Conectiv

100%

Conectiv Energy Holding Company
(A Delaware corporation)

Conectiv

100%

Conectiv Delmarva Generation, Inc
(A Delaware corporation)

Conectiv Energy Holding Company

100%

Potomac Capital Investment Corp.
(a Delaware corporation)

Pepco Holdings, Inc.

100%

Conectiv Energy Supply, Inc.
(a Delaware corporation)

Conectiv Energy Holding Company

100%

SCH 3
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SCHEDULE 4

LIENS

 

Incurred By

Owed To

Property
Encumbered

Maturity

Amount of
Indebtedness

Potomac Electric Power Co.

CitiCapital (BLC)

Vehicles, Office Equip., Computers

Master Agreement

$  12,148,151*

Potomac Electric Power Co.
(Pepco Energy Services)

Hannon Armstrong
Pepco Funding Corp.

Contract Payments Receivable

Master Agreement

$50,394,400 *

Potomac Electric Power Co.
(Pepco Energy Services)

Citizen Leasing Corp.

Contract Payments Receivable

Master Agreement

$9 ,714,030 *

Potomac Electric Power Co.
(Pepco Energy Services)

National City Commercial Capital

Contract Payments Receivable

Master Agreement

$14,066,168*

Delmarva Power & Light Company

Town of St. Michaels, Maryland

Distribution Equipment

October 15, 2006

$361,622*

Atlantic City Electric Co.

Guo Mao International Hotels B.V.

Scrubber @ B.L. England Generation Station

January 21, 2007

$    4,616,253*

Potomac Electric Power Co.

Avaya Financial Services

Telecommunications Equipment

September 15, 2008

$712,742*

Potomac Electric Power Co.

Storagetek Financial Srvc Corp.

Computer Equipment

September 1, 2006

$813,378*

Potomac Electric Power Co.

CIT Communications Finance Corporation

Telecommunications Equipment

May 1, 2006

$679,847*

*The amount of this lien fluctuates with the amount of accounts receivable created by this program. The amount listed is as of March 31, 2005.

SCH 4
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

SCHEDULE 5

NONRECOURSE INDEBTEDNESS

Name of Company

Aggregate
Principal
Amount

Type of
Indebtedness

Potomac Capital Investment Corporation
(Potomac Equipment Leasing Corporation)

$15,901,000

Promissory Note with
First Security Bank

SCH 5
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

SCHEDULE 6

PERMITTED ACE ASSET SALES

Keystone Electric Generating Station*

Shelocta, PA

Conemaugh Electric Generating Station*

New Florence, PA

B L England Electric Generating Station

Beesley's Pt., NJ

 

* Joint owned plants. ACE owns 2.47% of Keystone and 3.83% of Conemaugh

SCH 6
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

SCHEDULE 7

REQUIRED APPROVALS

Borrower

Required
Approval

Date by which Required
Approval must be Obtained

PHI

SEC

June 30, 2005

PEPCO

SEC

June 30, 2005

DPL

SEC
Virginia State Corporation Commission

June 30, 2005
March 31, 2006

ACE

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities

January 1, 2006

SCH 7
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SCHEDULE 8

EXISTING LETTER OF CREDIT AS OF 5/4/05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pepco Holdings, Inc. $700M Credit Facility

 

Expiration Date

Company

Beneficiary

Bank

Date Issued

L/C #

Current Amount

 

 

 

 

07/31/05

ATS

Liberty Mutual

JPMorgan

01/31/98

320373

$100,000

 

07/31/05

CIV

Penn Manafactures Assoc

JPMorgan

04/05/00

322173

$875,000

 

07/31/05

ACE/DPL

Indemnity Insurance Co. of NA

JPMorgan

02/21/02

750148

$1,600,000

 

02/28/06

CDG/COSC

Liberty Mutual

JPMorgan

04/30/02

750199

$600,000

 

05/31/05

CBI

PJM Intercon. LLC & PPL Utilities

JPMorgan

08/26/02

750587

$450,000

 

11/01/06

CMM

PJM Intercon. LLC

JPMorgan

11/08/04

430719

$1,627,150

 

11/01/05

CESI

IMO (Independent Market Operator)

JPMorgan

10/29/04

430690

$992,221

CAD $1,250,000

02/09/06

PES

Multiple Ins Co.'s - Ins Deductible

JPMorgan

02/09/05

440659

$823,235

 

 

 

 

Total PHI Credit Facility

$7,126,142

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Utilities $500M Credit Facility

 

Expiration Date

Company

Beneficiary

Bank

Date Issued

L/C #

Current Amount

 

 

 

 

07/30/06

ACE

US Department of Labor

JPMorgan

07/29/03

751346

$200,000

 

07/26/05

Pepco

MD Workers' Comp Commission

JPMorgan

07/29/04

430396

$4,300,000

 

07/26/05

DPL

MD Workers' Comp Commission

JPMorgan

07/29/04

430395

$350,000

 

 

 

 

Total Utilites Credit Facility

$4,850,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grand Total PHI & Utilities

$11,976,142

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCH 8
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________