EMGOLD MINING CORP (Form: 20-F/A, Received: 05/21/2013 16:36:07)

Emgold Mining Corporation (“the Company”) is incorporated under the British Columbia Corporations Act and the principal place of business is located at 1010 - 789 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 1H2. The Company is in the process of exploring its mineral property interests and has not yet determined whether its mineral property interests contain mineral reserves that are economically recoverable. The Company’s shares are traded on the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”) and the OTCQX.

There are several adverse conditions that cast significant doubt upon the soundness of this assumption. The Company has negative working capital, has incurred operating losses since inception, has no source of revenue, is unable to self-finance operations and has significant on-going cash requirements to meet its overhead and maintain its mineral interests. Further, the business of mining and exploration involves a high degree of risk and there can be no assurance that current exploration programs will result in profitable mining operations. The recoverability of exploration and evaluation assets is dependent upon several factors. These include the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete the development of these properties, and future profitable production or proceeds from disposition of mineral properties.

For the Company to continue to operate as a going concern it must obtain additional financing; although the Company has been successful in the past at raising funds, there can be no assurance that this will continue in the future.

If the going concern assumption were not appropriate for these consolidated financial statements then adjustments would be necessary to the carrying value of assets and liabilities, the reported expenses and the statement of financial position classifications used and such adjustments could be material.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and related IFRS Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC’s”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for financial instruments classified as financial instruments (note 3) at fair value through profit and loss, which are stated at their fair value. In addition, these consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting except for cash flow information.

The policies set out were consistently applied to all the periods presented unless otherwise noted below. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with IAS 1 requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise judgment in applying the Company’s accounting policies.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, profit and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making the judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an on-going basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and further periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.

The functional and reporting currency of the Company is the United States dollar.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for the revaluation of certain financial instruments. The Company's principal accounting policies are outlined below:

These consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and the entities controlled by the Company. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries:

Control exists when the Company has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Non-controlling interest in the net assets of consolidated subsidiaries are identified separately from the Company’s equity. Non-controlling interest consists of the non-controlling interest at the date of the original business combination plus the non-controlling interest’s share of changes in equity since the date of acquisition. The Company has no non-controlling interests.

Acquisitions of subsidiaries and businesses are accounted for using the purchase method. The cost of the business combination is measured as the aggregate of the fair values (at the date of exchange) of assets given, liabilities incurred or assumed, and equity instruments issued by the Company in exchange for control of the acquiree, plus any costs directly attributable to the business combination. The acquiree's identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities that meet the conditions for recognition under IFRS 3 Business Combinations are recognised at their fair values at the acquisition date, except for non-current assets (or disposal groups) that are classified as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, which are recognised and measured at fair value less costs to sell.

Goodwill arising on acquisition is recognised as an asset and initially measured at cost, being the excess of the cost of the business combination over the Company's interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities recognised.

Emgold Mining Corporation

US Dollars

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

If the Company's interest in the net fair value of the acquiree's identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities exceeds the cost of the business combination, the excess is recognised immediately in profit or loss. The interest of non-controlling shareholders in the acquiree is initially measured at the non-controlling shareholders' proportion of the net fair value of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities recognised.

These consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars (“$”), which is the Company’s functional and presentation currency. References to CDN$ represent Canadian dollars. The functional currency for the Company’s subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates which is United States dollars. Transactions entered into by the Company’s subsidiary in a currency other than the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates (its "functional currency") are recorded at the rates ruling when the transactions occur except depreciation and depletion which are translated at the rates of exchange applicable to the related assets, with any gains or losses recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.

Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current rates of exchange with the resulting gain or losses recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. Exchange differences arising on the retranslation of unsettled monetary assets and liabilities are recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated using historical exchange rates. Non-monetary assets and liabilities measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rate at the date when the fair value is determined.

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements, in conformity with IFRS, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The Company’s key estimates relate to the valuation and estimated useful lives of equipment, the measurement of stock-based compensation, the valuation of warrants, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and liabilities, valuation and recoverability of resource properties, and the valuation of shares issued for resource property. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Depreciation and depletion of property, plant and equipment assets are dependent upon estimates of useful lives and reserve estimates, both of which are determined with the exercise of judgment. The assessment of any impairment of property, plant and equipment is dependent upon estimates of recoverable amounts taking into account factors such as reserves, economic and market conditions and the useful lives of assets. Provisions for environmental rehabilitations are recognised in the period in which they arise and are stated as the fair value of estimated future costs.

The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience, and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. These estimates require the extensive use of judgment about the nature, cost and timing of the work to be completed, and may change with future changes to costs, environmental laws and regulations and remediation practices. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

Emgold Mining Corporation

US Dollars

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company grants stock options to buy common shares of the Company to directors, officers, employees and service providers. The Board of Directors grants such options for periods of up to five years, with vesting periods determined at its sole discretion and at prices equal to or greater than the closing market price on the day preceding the date the options were granted.

The fair value of the options is measured at grant date, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and is recognized over the period that the options are earned. The fair value is recognized as an expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The amount recognized as expense is adjusted to reflect the number of share options expected to vest.

All financial instruments must be recognized, initially, at fair value on the consolidated statement of financial position. The Company has classified each financial instrument into the following categories: “fair value through profit or loss,” “loans and receivables,” and “other liabilities.” Subsequent measurement of the financial instruments is based on their respective classification. Unrealized gains and losses on held for trading instruments are recognized in earnings. The other categories of financial instruments are recognized at amortized cost using the effective interest method. The Company had made the following classifications:

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) except to the extent it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.

Current tax expense is based on the results for the period as adjusted for items that are not taxable or not deductible. Current tax is calculated using tax rates and laws that were enacted or substantively enacted at the end of the reporting period. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation is subject to interpretation. Provisions are established where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.

Deferred taxes are the taxes expected to be payable or recoverable between the carrying amounts of assets in the consolidated statement of financial position and their corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and are accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognized for all taxable temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and their corresponding tax bases. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilized. Such assets and liabilities are not recognized if the temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets in a transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit.

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the reporting year. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the weighted average shares outstanding are increased to include additional shares for the assumed exercise of stock options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares is calculated by assuming that outstanding stock options and warrants were exercised if in the money and that the proceeds from such exercises were used to acquire common stock at the average market price during the reporting periods.

Comprehensive profit (loss) is the change in the Company's net assets that results from transactions, events and circumstances from sources other than the Company's shareholders and includes items that would not normally be included in net profit such as unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments, gains or losses on certain derivative instruments and foreign currency gains or losses related to self-sustaining operations. The Company's comprehensive profit (loss) is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Profit (Loss) and the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity.

Emgold Mining Corporation

US Dollars

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Plant and equipment assets are depreciated using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives, which generally range from 1 to 5 years. Land is not depreciated.

Where an item of plant and equipment is comprised of major components with different useful lives, the components are accounted for as separate items of plant and equipment. Expenditures incurred to replace a component of an item of property, plant and equipment that is accounted for separately, including major inspection and overhaul expenditures, are capitalized. Directly attributable expenses incurred for major capital projects and site preparation are capitalized until the asset is brought to a working condition for its intended use. These costs include dismantling and site restoration costs to the extent these are recognized as a provision.

The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials, direct labour and an appropriate portion of normal overheads.

The costs of day-to-day servicing are recognized in profit or loss as incurred. These costs are more commonly referred to as "maintenance and repairs."

Financing costs directly associated with the construction or acquisition of qualifying assets are capitalized at interest rates relating to loans specifically raised for that purpose, or at the average borrowing rate where the general pool of group borrowings is utilized. Capitalization of borrowing costs ceases when the asset is substantially complete.

Leases in which the Company assumes substantially all risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are recognized at the lower of the fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments at inception of the lease, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.

The cost of replacing part of an item within property, plant and equipment is recognized when the cost is incurred if it is probable that the future economic benefits will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other costs are recognized as an expense as incurred.

The Company's tangible and intangible assets are reviewed for an indication of impairment at each statement of financial position date. If indication of impairment exists, the asset's recoverable amount is estimated.

An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of an asset, or its cash-generating unit, exceeds its recoverable amount. A cash-generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. Impairment losses are recognized in profit and loss for the period.

Impairment losses recognized in respect of cash-generating units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to cash-generating units and then to reduce the carrying amount of the other assets in the unit on a pro-rata basis.

The recoverable amount is the greater of the asset's fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

An impairment loss is reversed if there is an indication that there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized. An impairment loss with respect to goodwill is never reversed.

The Company is currently in the exploration stage with all of its mineral interests. Exploration and evaluation costs include the costs of acquiring licenses, costs incurred to explore and evaluate properties, and the fair value, upon acquisition, of mineral properties acquired in a business combination.

Exploration and evaluation expenditures are expensed in the period they are incurred except for expenditures associated with the acquisition of exploration and evaluation assets through a business combination or an asset acquisition. Significant property acquisition costs are capitalized only to the extent that such costs can be directly attributed to an area of interest where it is considered likely to be recoverable by future exploitation or sale. Development costs relating to specific properties are capitalized once management has made a development decision.

From time to time, the Company may acquire or dispose of mineral interests pursuant to the terms of option agreements. Due to the fact that options are exercisable entirely at the discretion of the optionee, the amounts payable or receivable are not recorded. Option payments are recorded in the period that the payments are made or received. The Company does not accrue costs to maintain mineral interests in good standing.

The Company recognizes liabilities for legal obligations associated with the reclamation or rehabilitation of mineral property interests that the Company is required to settle. The Company recognizes the fair value of liabilities for such obligations in the year in which they occur or in the year in which a reasonable estimate of such costs can be made. The obligation is recorded as a liability with a corresponding charge to operations. The Company has determined that it has no material restoration obligations as at 31 December 2012.

An impairment loss is reversed if there is an indication that there has been a positive change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized. An impairment loss with respect to goodwill is never reversed.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, deposits in banks and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less.

Emgold Mining Corporation

US Dollars

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Environmental

The Company recognizes liabilities for statutory, contractual, constructive or legal obligations associated with the retirement of property, plant and equipment when those obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of the assets. The net present value of future rehabilitation cost estimates is capitalized along with a corresponding increase in the rehabilitation provision in the period incurred. Discount rates using a pre-tax rate that reflect the time value of money are used to calculate the net present value. The rehabilitation asset is depreciated on the same basis as mining assets.

The Company's estimates of reclamation costs could change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements and assumptions regarding the amount and timing of the future expenditures. These changes are recorded directly to mining assets with a corresponding entry to the rehabilitation provision. The Company's estimates are reviewed annually for changes in regulatory requirements, effects of inflation and changes in estimates.

Changes in the net present value, excluding changes in the Company's estimates of reclamation costs, are charged to profit and loss for the period.

The costs of rehabilitation projects that were included in the rehabilitation provision are recorded against the provision as incurred. The cost of on-going current programs to prevent and control pollution is charged against profit and loss as incurred.

Provisions are recorded when a present legal or constructive obligation exists as a result of past events where it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation can be made.

The amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the statement of financial position date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. Where a provision is measured using the cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation, its carrying amount is the present value of those cash flows. When some or all of the economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected to be recovered from a third party, the receivable is recognized as an asset if it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received and the amount receivable can be measured reliably.

Decommissioning liabilities include an estimate of the future cost associated with the abandonment and reclamation of property and equipment, discounted to its present value, and capitalized as part of the cost of that asset. The estimated costs are based on the present value of the expenditure expected to be incurred. Changes in the discount rate, estimated timing of decommissioning costs, or cost estimates are dealt with prospectively by recording a change in estimate, and a corresponding adjustment to equipment. The accretion on the decommissioning provision is included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss.

Debt and equity instruments are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangement.

An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.

Other financial liabilities are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction costs, and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognized on an effective yield basis.

The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial liability and of allocating interest expenses over the corresponding period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments over the expected life of the financial liability, or, where appropriate, a shorter period.

The Company derecognizes financial liabilities when, and only when, the Company’s obligations are discharged, cancelled or they expire.

Canadian tax legislation permits a company to issue flow-through shares whereby the deduction for tax purposes relating to qualified resource expenditures is claimed by the investors rather than the Company. Recording these expenditures for accounting purposes gives rise to taxable temporary differences. A liability is recognized for the premium on the flow-through shares and is subsequently reversed as the Company incurs qualifying Canadian exploration expenses. When flow-through expenditures are renounced to the investors, a portion of the deferred income tax assets that were not recognized in previous years, due to the recording of a deferred tax asset not recognized, are recognized as a recovery of income taxes in the statement of comprehensive loss.

In the application of the Company’s accounting policies, which are described in note 3, management is required to make judgments, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amount and classification of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an on-going basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revisions affect only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods, if the revision affects both current and future periods.

The following are the critical judgments and areas involving estimates, that management have made in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of the accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes the Company’s ability to continue in operation for the foreseeable future and to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of operations. There are several adverse conditions that cast significant doubt upon the soundness of this assumption. Refer to note 1 for more details.

In accordance with IAS 21, The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates , management determined that the functional currency of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries is the US dollar.

The company owns land and surface rights which is part of the Idaho-Maryland property in the amount of $747,219. This land is adjacent to the property which the company leases that expired on February 1, 2013 (see note 16). The company assessed that no impairment was necessary on the land and surface rights that they own as they are still negotiating to extend the lease however if the lease were not extended the land will still be of value as its location is strategic to the operating of the surface mine.

As discussed in note 3, the Company reviews the estimated lives of its plant and equipment at the end of each reporting period. There were no material changes in the lives of plant and equipment for the years ended 31 December 2012 and 2011.

The estimated costs are reviewed annually by management including changes in the discount rate, estimated timing of decommissioning costs, or cost estimates.

Management assesses the fair value of stock options granted in accordance with the accounting policy stated in note 3. The fair value of stock options granted is measured using the Black-Scholes option valuation model (“BkS”), which was created for use in estimating the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options. The Company’s stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and changes in the highly subjective input assumptions can materially affect the calculated values. The fair value of stock options granted using the BkS do not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock option awards. The same model is used by the Company is order to arrive at a fair value for the issuance of warrants.

Provisions for income taxes are made using the best estimate of the amount expected to be paid based on a qualitative assessment of all relevant factors. The Company reviews the adequacy of these provisions at the end of the reporting period. However, it is possible that at some future date an additional liability could result from audits by taxing authorities. Where the final outcome of these tax-related matters is different from the amounts that were originally recorded, such differences will affect the tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made.

The Company makes certain estimates and assumptions regarding the recoverability of the carrying values of exploration and evaluation assets. These assumptions are changed when conditions exist that indicate the carrying value may be impaired, at which time an impairment loss is recorded.

Emgold Mining Corporation

US Dollars

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following accounting standards have been issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) but are not yet effective for the Company; both the effective date and the expected impact are noted, based on the information currently available.

The Standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 01 January 2013, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company has not early-adopted the standard and is currently assessing the impact it will have on the consolidated financial statements.

The Standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 01 January 2015, with earlier adoption permitted. The standard is the first part of a multi-phase project to replace IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement . The Company has not early-adopted the standard and is currently assessing the impact it will have on the consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 10 establishes principles for the presentation and preparation of consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more other entities. IFRS 10 supersedes IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements” and Standing Interpretation Committee (“SIC”)-12 “Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities,” and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 01 January 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The Company does not expect the standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 11 establishes principles for financial reporting by parties to a joint arrangement. IFRS 11 supersedes current IAS 31, Interests in Joint Ventures and SIC-13, Jointly Controlled Entities-Non – Monetary Contributions by Venturers and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 01 January 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 12 applies to entities that have an interest in a subsidiary, a joint arrangement, an associate or an unconsolidated structured entity. IFRS 12 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 01 January 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 13 defines fair value, sets out a single IFRS framework for measuring value and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. IFRS 13 applies to IFRSs that require or permit fair value measurements or disclosures about fair value measurements (and measurements, such as fair value less costs to sell, based on fair value or disclosures about those measurements), except in specified circumstances. IFRS 13 is to be applied for annual periods beginning on or after 01 January 2013. Earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.

The amendments introduce changes to presentation of items of other comprehensive income. The amendments require that an entity present separately the items of other comprehensive income that would be reclassified to profit and loss in the future if certain conditions are met from those that would never be reclassified to profit and loss. The amendments are to be applied effective 01 July 2012 and may be early adopted. The amendments are to be applied retroactively in accordance with IAS 8, Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on its consolidated financial statements.

The amended standard introduces various changes in accounting and disclosure requirements for defined benefit plans. The amended standard also finalizes proposals on accounting for termination benefits; under the amended standard the termination benefits are recognized at the earlier of when the entity recognizes costs for a restructuring within the scope of IAS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets , that includes the payment of a termination benefit, and when the entity can no longer withdraw the offer of the termination benefit. The amended standard is to be applied for periods beginning on or after 01 January 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments to the standard do not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

IAS 27, " Separate financial statements " (IAS 27) was re-issued by the IASB in May 2011 to only prescribe the accounting and disclosure requirements for investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates when an entity prepares separate financial statements. The consolidation guidance will now be included in IFRS 10. The amendments to IAS 27 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 01 January 2013. The standard does not impact the consolidated financial statements.

The standard was updated to incorporate the accounting for joint ventures because the equity method is now applicable to both joint ventures and associates. The disclosure requirements from IAS 28 (as revised in 2003) have been included in IFRS 12.

IAS 32, “ Financial Instruments: Presentation” provides further clarity around details relating to the right of set-off and the application of offsetting criteria under certain circumstances. The amendments to IAS 27 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 01 January 2014. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the consolidated financial statements.

IFRIC 20 is a new interpretation on the accounting for waste removal activities. The interpretation considers when and how to account separately for the benefits arising from a stripping activity, as well as how to measure such benefit. The interpretation generally requires that costs from a stripping activity which improve access to ore to be recognized as a non-current asset when certain criteria are met and should be accounted as an addition to the related asset. The Company does not expect the standard to impact its consolidated financial statements.

Emgold Mining Corporation

US Dollars

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Financial instruments of the Company are carried on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at amortized cost with the exception of cash, marketable securities and warrant liability, which are carried at fair value. There are no significant differences between the carrying value of financial instruments and their estimated fair values as at 31 December 2012 due to the immediate or short-term maturities of the financial instruments.

The fair value of the Company’s cash and marketable securities are quoted in active markets. The Company classifies the fair value of these transactions according to the following hierarchy:

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical financial instruments.

Level 2 – quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

Level 3 – valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents have been assessed using the fair value hierarchy described above and classified as Level 1. The warrant liability has been classified as Level 3.

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, amounts receivable, due to/from related parties, marketable securities, deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and warrant liability. At 31 December 2012, the carrying value of cash, marketable securities, and warrant liability is fair value. Amounts receivable, due to/from related parties deposits and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to their short-term nature.

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices will affect the Company’s earnings or the value of its financial instruments. Market risk is comprised of commodity price risk and interest rate risk. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control exposures within acceptable limits, while maximizing returns. The Company is not exposed to significant market risk.

Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a financial loss. The Company’s primary exposure to credit risk is on its bank accounts. The Company’s bank accounts are held with major banks in Canada, accordingly the Company believes it is not exposed to significant credit risk.

Interest rate risk is the risk of losses that arise as a result of changes in contracted interest rates. The Company is nominally exposed to interest rate risk.

Emgold Mining Corporation

US Dollars

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Currency risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. To manage this risk the Company maintains only the minimum amount of foreign cash required to fund its on-going exploration expenditures. The Company is not exposed to significant foreign currency risk, as a 5% shift in foreign exchange rates would result in an impact of $2,700. At 31 December 2012 the Company held currency totalling the following:

Liquidity risk arises through the excess of financial obligations over available financial assets due at any point in time. The Company’s objective in managing liquidity risk is to maintain sufficient readily available reserves in order to meet its liquidity requirements at any point in time. As the Company has no significant source of cash flows this is a significant risk.

Pursuant to the terms of the Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement, on 13 January 2011, Valterra issued to the Company 50,000 units consisting of one common share and one share purchase warrant per unit. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of Valterra at $0.10 for a five year period. On the date of issue the common shares were valued at $3,268 and the warrants were valued at $1,637 using the Black‑Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: 2 year term, 99% volatility, risk free interest rate of 1.64% and a dividend rate of Nil.

Pursuant to an amendment of the Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement, on 08 February 2011, Valterra issued to the Company 600,000 units consisting of one common share and one share purchase warrant per unit. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of Valterra at $0.10 for a two year period. On the date of issue the common shares were valued at $42,870 and the warrants were valued at $18,301 using the Black‑Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: 2 year term, 99% volatility, risk free interest rate of 1.64% and a dividend rate of Nil.

As at 31 March 2012, the common shares and warrants of Valterra were revalued at fair market value of $16,627 resulting in an unrealized loss on marketable securities of $1,437. The $2,585 fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: 1.46 year term, 135% volatility, risk free interest rate of 1.01% and a dividend rate of Nil.

During the quarter ended 31 December 2012, the Company liquidated all marketable securities resulting in a realized loss of $6,831. The Company still holds a nominal number of warrants issued from Valterra; their value is not material and has not been included in the records of the Company.

In fiscal 2002, the Company renegotiated a lease with the owners of the Idaho-Maryland Property (“I-M Property”) and surrounding areas in the Grass Valley Mining District, California.

The owners granted to the Company the exclusive right and option to purchase all of the leased property. The property is subject to a 3% Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”) from production if the property is still being leased. Any royalty payments made prior to exercising the purchase option may be deducted from the purchase price. During the year ended 31 December 2010, the Company extended the lease and option agreement from 01 February 2011, for an additional two years to 01 February 2013. Lease payments during the extension period are $30,000 per quarter. In conjunction with the extension, the lessors agreed to defer payments for 2010 totalling $120,000. Under the terms of the deferral, this amount was added to the purchase price of the I‑M Property, the first instalment of which becomes due on 01 February 2013. The $120,000 will be subject to interest calculated at 5.25% compounded annually. Provided that payments are kept current, the Company may purchase the property at any time. The purchase price at 01 February 2013, would be $6,154,717.

On 01 February 2013, subsequent to year ended 2012, the Lease Option to Purchase Agreement for 91 acres of surface rights and 2,750 aces of mineral rights associated with the I-M Property expired. The Company is in negotiations with the owners to extend this Agreement. Refer to note 16 for further details.

In November 2009 the Company entered into a lease and option to purchase agreement to acquire 100% of the rights to the Buckskin Rawhide East mineral claims (46 claims), a gold prospect located near Fallon, Nevada. The Company agreed to lease the property from Nevada Sunrise, LLC subject to the following advance royalty payments: $10,000 annually for the years 2009 to 2011; $20,000 in 2012; $40,000 in 2013, and $60,000 from 2014 to 2019. During the lease period, the Company could conduct exploration and, if warranted, complete a NI 43-101 compliant feasibility study. On completion of the feasibility study, the Company could acquire 100% ownership of the property by paying Nevada Sunrise, LLC an additional amount of $250,000. Nevada Sunrise, LLC was required to use these funds to purchase a retained 25% interest in the property from Maurice and Lorraine Castagne, pursuant to an underlying property agreement, and to transfer that title to the Company. Upon commercial production and after acquisition of 100% interest in the property, Nevada Sunrise, LLC will be entitled to a 2.5% NSR on production from the property. The annual lease payments of $10,000 due in December 2011 and 2010 were paid by the issuance of 106,290 and 49,424 common shares, respectively.

On 11 April 2011, the Company announced it had staked six additional claims, increasing the size of the Buckskin Rawhide East Property to 52 claims.

Emgold Mining Corporation

US Dollars

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

On 24 January 2012, the Company signed a Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with Jeremy C. Wire to acquire the PC and RH mineral claims, located 0.3 miles west of Emgold’s existing Buckskin Rawhide Property, in Mineral County, Nevada. The PC and RH claims, called Buckskin Rawhide West, comprise 21 unpatented lode mining claims totalling 420 acres. Pursuant to the lease agreement, advance royalty payments will be payable by the Company to Jeremy C. Wire in the amount of $10,000 per year during years 2013 to 2014, $20,000 in 2015 and $30,000 per year in years 2016 to 2018. Payments may be made in cash or shares, based on the discretion of the Company or the owner, depending on the Year. In 2012, consideration in the amounts of $5,000 cash and $5,000 equivalent in common shares (50,000 shares) was paid, as per the Agreement, upon TSX-Venture Exchange approval.

On 14 and 19 November 2012, the Company announced a series of transactions involving its Buckskin Rawhide East Property in Nevada. The Company announced it had signed an Option Agreement to complete an early buyout of all underlying property rights, including royalty rights, for its Buckskin Rawhide East Property. The Option provides that Emgold will pay two arm’s length parties (Nevada Sunrise LLC and the Castagne) an aggregate of $510,000 to allow the Company to consolidate a 100% interest in the 52 unpatented mineral claims, totalling 835 acres, that make up Buckskin Rawhide East Property. The Company also announced that it had signed an Agreement with Rawhide Mining LLC (“RMC”) pursuant to which the Company would issue to RMC, on a private placement basis, shares and warrants in an amount of CDN$1.0 million, part of which would be used to fund the above transaction. Also pursuant to the Agreement, upon completion of the title transfer of the 100% of the Buckskin Rawhide East Property to Emgold. the Company will subsequently lease the property to RMC. This transaction is occurring in a number of steps.

On 28 December 2012, the Company announced the first step of the above transaction. The first tranche of the private placement was closed for proceeds totalling CDN$465,000. A total of $400,000 from this tranche of the financing was used to acquire a 100% interest in 6 unpatented mining claims and a 75% interest in 40 unpatented mineral claims, including royalty interests, from one of the underlying property owners mentioned above.

Subsequent to year end 2012, on 01 February 2013, Emgold announced the closing of the second step of the above transaction, which included a second private placement, for proceeds of CDN$285,000. The Company is currently working on the third step of the transaction, which will involve the acquisition of the remaining 25% of 40 unpatented mineral claims that make up part of the Buckskin Rawhide East Property. As part of this step, the remaining CDN$250,000 private placement will be completed with RMC, of which $110,000 will be used to acquire the 25% interest.

The fourth and final step with RMC will involve completion of a Lease Agreement. RMC has agreed to lease the Buckskin Rawhide East Property from Emgold based on the following terms:

The Company has met all commitments on this property as of the year ended 31 December 2012 and up to the date of this report, and issued 118,000 common shares subsequent to year end.

On 13 February, 2013, the Company announced it had signed a Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with Jeremy C. Wire to acquire the RHT and GEL claims, located four miles south of the Company’s Buckskin Rawhide Claims in Mineral County, Nevada. The RHT and GEL claims “Koegel Rawhide Property” comprise 19 unpatented lode mining claims totalling 380 acres. Pursuant to the lease agreement, advance royalty payment will be payable by the Company to Jeremy C. Wire in the amount of $10,000 per year during years 2013 to 2014, $20,000 in 2015 and $30,000 per year in years 2016 to 2018. Payments may be made in cash or shares, based on the discretion of the Company or the owner, depending on the Year. In 2012, consideration payable in the amounts of $5,000 cash and $5,000 equivalent in common shares (50,000 shares) were paid, as per the Agreement, upon TSX-Venture Exchange Approval.

On 15 February 2012, the Company announced it has staked an additional 17 unpatented claims to expand this property to 36 unpatented mineral claims totalling 720 acres.

The Company has met all commitments on this property as of the year ended 31 December 2012 and up to the date of this report, and issued 118,000 common shares subsequent to year end.

In 2000, the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire the rights to the Rozan Gold Property, a prospect located in British Columbia. The Company holds a 100% interest in the property, subject to a 3.0% NSR. The Company has the right to purchase 66% of the royalty for the sum of CDN$1,000,000 and has the first right of refusal to purchase the remaining 33%.

During the year ended 31 December 2010, the Company entered into a Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Valterra Resource Corporation (“Valterra”). The Agreement called for cumulative work commitments of $1,000,000 over 5 years, with a commitment of $50,000 in 2010, $200,000 in 2011, and $250,000 in each of years 3 to 5.

In January 2012, after failing to meet its work commitments on the Rozan Gold Property, Valterra announced that it has elected to terminate the Agreement with the Company and the property was returned to Emgold.

Pursuant to an option agreement entered into in 2001 and completed in 2008, the Company acquired the rights to the Stewart mineral claims, a prospect located close to Nelson in south eastern British Columbia. The Company holds a 100% right, title and interest in and to the property, subject only to a 3% NSR payable to the optionors. The Company has the right to purchase 66% of the royalty for the sum of CDN$1,000,000 and has the first right of refusal to purchase the remaining 33%. The Company has staked 21 claims contiguous to the Stewart Property located in south-eastern British Columbia.

In December 2012 the Company closed the first tranche of a private placement, issuing 6,642,857 Units at CDN$0.07 per Unit for gross proceeds of CDN$465,000. Each Unit consists of one common share of the Company and one half common share purchase warrant. Each full warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one additional common share at a price of CDN$0.12 per share. No finder’s fees were payable in connection with this part of the financing. The share issued, along with any shares issued upon the exercise of warrants, will be subject to a four month and one day hold period, expiring 29 April 2013.

In December 2011 the Company completed a non-brokered private placement of flow-through units for gross proceeds of $767,750. A total of 5,905,769 units were issued at a price of CDN$0.13 per unit. Each unit consists of one “flow-through” common share of the Company and one half of one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 18 months, one additional common share of the Company at a price of CDN$0.20 per share. The share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 109% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the share purchase warrants was $117,359. A $NIL flow-through premium related to this private placement.

Finder’s fees of CDN$49,920 and 383,999 finder’s warrants were awarded in relation to the flow‑through financing. The finder’s warrants entitle the holder to purchase, for a period of 18 months, one additional common share of the Company - 269,230 are exercisable at a price of CDN$0.15 and 114,769 are exercisable at a price of CDN$0.20. The finder warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 109% and an expected life of 1.5 years. The total value ascribed to the finder's warrants was $18,514. The Company has filed the renunciation of flow‑expenditures as required by the Canadian tax authorities.

The Shares issued in connection with these non-brokered private placements, including any issued on the exercise of the warrants, will be subject to a minimum hold period of four months.

Emgold Mining Corporation

US Dollars

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company has a rolling stock option plan for its directors and employees to acquire common shares of the Company at a price determined by the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant. The maximum aggregate number of common shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the plan is 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares.

The outstanding options have a weighted-average exercise price of $0.19 (31 December 2011 - $0.23) and the weighted-average remaining life of the options is 2.51 years (31 Dec 2011 – 2.94) years. As at 31 December 2012, a total of 4,736,332 (31 December 2011 – 2,872,665) of these outstanding options had vested. As at 31 December 2012, none (31 December 2011 – none) of the outstanding options were in the money.

During the year ended 31 December 2011, a total of 405,700 incentive stock options granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company with exercise prices ranging from CDN$1.00 to CDN$10.00 were re-priced to $0.175 per share. The expiry dates remained unchanged.

Emgold Mining Corporation

US Dollars

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

In accordance with IFRS, an obligation to issue shares for a price that is not fixed in the Company’s functional currency, and that does not qualify as a rights offering, must be classified as a derivative liability and measured at fair value with changes recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss as they arise. The Company has issued such share purchase warrants. As a result, these share purchase warrants must be accounted for as a liability. As at 31 December 2012, the Company recorded a warrant liability in the amount of $30,411 (31 December 2011 - $1,079,253). The warrants were valued upon issuance and subsequently revalued on 31 December 2012 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following assumptions: weighted average risk free rate of 1.13%, volatility factors of 50% - 70% and an expected life of 6 months – 24 months. An unrealized gain on warrant liability of $1,492,098 has been recorded in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the year ended 31 December 2012.

The fair value of the stock-based compensation of options to be recognized in the accounts has been estimated using the Black-Scholes Model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Stock-based compensation for the options that vested during the year is as follows:

The Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model was created for use in estimating the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options. The Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the highly subjective input assumptions can materially affect the calculated values, management believes that the accepted Black-Scholes model does not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock option awards.

At 31 December 2012, fees of $462,767 (2011 – $244,033) payable to David Watkinson; fees of $14,022 (2011 – $Nil) payable to Clearline; fees of $27,286 (2011 – $7,997) payable to 759924 Ontario Ltd.; and fees of $Nil (2011 – $28,531) refundable from Quorum Management and Administrative Services Inc. were included in accounts payable or due to related parties. Also, amounts of $12,756 (2011 – $40,033) are receivable from Stephen Wilkinson at the year-end date.

During the year the Company received services from Quorum Management and Administrative Services Inc. (“Quorum”); refer to note 15 for further details.

Related party balances are non-interest bearing and are due on demand, with no fixed terms of repayment. These transactions occurred in the normal course of operations and are measured at their exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

The Company operates in one operating segment, which is the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral property interest. The following table provides segmented disclosure on assets and liabilities as reviewed by management regularly:

The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it, based on the funds available to the Company, in order to support the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company’s management to sustain future development of the business. The Company defines capital that it manages as share capital.

Management reviews its capital management approach on an on-going basis and believes that this approach, given the relative size of the Company, is reasonable.

The Company is in the business of mineral exploration and has no source of operating revenue. Operations are financed through the issuance of capital stock or liability instruments. Capital raised is held in cash in an interest bearing bank account until such time as it is required to pay operating expenses or resource property costs. The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital restrictions. Its objectives in managing its capital are to safeguard its cash and its ability to continue as a going concern, and to utilize as much of its available capital as possible for exploration activities. The Company’s objectives have not changed during the year ended 31 December 2012.

Emgold Mining Corporation

US Dollars

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

14)

Deferred taxes

The following table reconciles the expected income taxes expense (recovery) at the Canadian statutory income tax rates to the amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended 31 December 2012 and 2011:

Deferred taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes. Deferred tax assets at 31 December 2012 and 2011 are comprised of the following:

In addition, the Company has capital losses of approximately $39,471, which may be carried forward indefinitely to reduce future capital gains.

The Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $17,605,344 which may be carried forward to apply against future year income tax for US tax purposes, as follows:

The deferred tax assets have not been recognized because at this stage of the Company’s development, it is not determinable that future taxable profit will be available against which that Company can utilize such deferred tax assets.

During the year the Company received services from Quorum Management and Administrative Services Inc. (“Quorum”). Quorum is a private company held jointly by the Company and other public companies, created to provide services on a full cost recovery basis to the various public entities currently sharing certain personnel costs, office space, and overhead with the Company. In April 2012, the partners of Quorum made the decision to wind up its administrative operations effective 31 August 2012. Management is aware of the possibility that there may be a future cost associated with the conclusion of this agreement. At the year ended 31 December 2012 and at the date of this report, the Company is unable to make a reliable estimate of the cost or likelihood of them being incurred. Accordingly, no provision has been made in these consolidated financial statements.

Subsequent to the 31 December 2012 year end, the Company’s current extension of the Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement (the “BET Agreement”) expired on 01 February 2013. The BET Agreement, signed in 2002, originally had a five year term. It has been extended three times to date, in two year increments, with the last extension taking effect on 01 February 2011. The Company is currently in discussions with the BET Trust to extend and/or negotiate a new agreement, which would cover the lease and option to purchase of approximately 2,750 acres of mineral rights and 91 acres of surface rights associated with the Project. Refer to note 9 of these consolidated financial statements.

On 01 February 2013, the Company announced that it closed a previously reported private placement for gross proceeds of CDN $285,000. The private placement involved the issuance of 5,700,000 units ("Units") to RMC at a price of CDN$0.05 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one common share (a "Share") of the Company and one half of one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each full warrant entitles RMC to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one additional Share at a price of CDN$0.12. The Shares are subject to a minimum hold period of four months plus one day, expiring 02 June 2013. No finder’s fees were paid as part of this private placement. Refer to note 9 of these consolidated financial statements.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Financial Statements

(expressed in United States Dollars)

December 31, 2011 and 2010

Independent Auditors' Report

To the Shareholders of

Emgold Mining Corporation

Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Emgold Mining Corporation, which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, and the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors' Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

An independent firm associated with Moore Stephens International Limited | MSCM.CA

Opinion

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Emgold Mining Corporation as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board..

Emphasis of matter

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has yet to generate revenues. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these factors are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

		Signed: "MSCM LLP"

		Chartered Accountants
		Licensed Public Accountants

Toronto, Ontario

April 19, 2012

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

(expressed in United States Dollars)

	December 31,			December 31,			January 1,
	2011			2010			2010

Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	965,102		$	917,495		$	3,955
Accounts receivable		79,225			13,236			6,852
Due from related party (note 11)		28,531			124,605			-
Prepaid expenses and deposits		42,966			17,929			21,388

		1,115,824			1,073,265			32,195
Other assets		11,932			13,943			7,660
Marketable securities (note 4)		17,071			-			-
Property and equipment (note 5)		18,176			32,655			28,807
Mineral property interests (note 6)		1,035,163			1,087,420			1,067,707
	$	2,198,166		$	2,207,283		$	1,136,369

Liabilities
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	303,019		$	290,114		$	1,149,405
Due to related party (note 11)		160,965			247,813			757,022
Finance lease obligation (note 7)		-			7,585			5,976

		463,984			545,512			1,912,403
Finance lease obligation (note 7)		-			4,737			13,306
Convertible preference shares (note 8)		-			-			754,940
Warrant liability (note 9(c))		1,079,253			111,458			-
		1,543,237			661,707			2,680,649

Equity (deficiency)
Share capital (note 9(a))		42,817,739			41,490,268			38,891,718
Warrants (note 9(c))		1,219,617			1,271,008			112,355
Contributed surplus (note 9(b))		6,800,722			6,629,389			6,223,649
Deficit		(50,183,149	)		(47,845,089	)		(46,772,002	)
		654,929			1,545,576			(1,544,280	)
	$	2,198,166		$	2,207,283		$	1,136,369

Nature of Operations and Going Concern (note 1)

Subsequent Events (note 17)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Approved by the Board

Signed:	"David Watkinson"	Signed:	"Ken Yurichuk"

Director		Director

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss

for the years ended December 31,

(expressed in United States Dollars)

	December 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010

Expenses
Exploration and evaluation costs (note 16)	$	1,307,140		$	670,491
Salaries and benefits		213,358			178,913
Legal, accounting and audit		175,381			99,012
Office and administration		90,011			168,903
Shareholder communications		62,202			82,272
Unrealized loss on marketable securities (note 4)		49,005			-
Stock-based compensation (note 9(b))		45,812			300,647
Management and consulting fees		42,634			68,763
Depreciation		14,478			14,214
Travel		-			1,179
Finance expense		-			32,413
Gain on settlement of debt		-			(77,197	)
Gain on settlement of preference shares (note 8)		-			(189,669	)
Interest income		-			(261	)
Recovery of bad debt expense		-			(305,432	)
Gain on sale of property and equipment		(1,000	)		(48,788	)
Foreign exchange (gain) loss		(40,297	)		57,480
Unrealized loss on warrant liability (note 9(c))		379,336			20,147
		2,338,060			1,073,087
Loss before provision for income taxes		(2,338,060	)		(1,073,087	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year	$	(2,338,060	)	$	(1,073,087	)
Net loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.05	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		40,189,279			23,453,214

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

(expressed in United States Dollars)

	Share Capital												Total
	without par value												Shareholder
	(note 9)							Contributed					Equity
	Shares		Amount		Warrants			Surplus		Deficit			(Deficiency)

Balance, January 1, 2010		16,894,310	$	38,891,718	$	112,355		$	6,223,649	$	(46,772,002	)	$	(1,544,280	)
Shares issued for property acquisition		68,856		18,306		-			-		-			18,306
Shares issued on settlement of debt		608,135		73,886		-			-		-			73,886
Shares and warrants issued for settlement of dividends on preference shares		3,208,418		517,151		479,587			-		-			996,738
Private placements, less share issuance costs		17,772,725		1,989,207		679,066			-		-			2,668,273
Stock-based compensation		-		-		-			405,740		-			405,740
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year		-		-		-			-		(1,073,087	)		(1,073,087	)
Balance, December 31, 2010		38,552,444	$	41,490,268	$	1,271,008		$	6,629,389	$	(47,845,089	)	$	1,545,576
Shares issued for property acquisitions		106,290		13,341		-			-		-			13,341
Private placements, less share issue costs		20,055,770		1,314,130		60,964			-		-			1,375,094
Warrants expired, unexercised		-		-		(112,355	)		112,355		-			-
Stock-based compensation		-		-		-			58,978		-			58,978
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year		-		-		-			-		(2,338,060	)		(2,338,060	)
Balance, December 31, 2011		58,714,504	$	42,817,739	$	1,219,617		$	6,800,722	$	(50,183,149	)	$	654,929

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

for the years ended December 31,

(expressed in United States Dollars)

	December 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010

Cash flow from operating activities
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year	$	(2,338,060	)	$	(1,073,087	)
Items not affecting cash
Depreciation		14,478			14,214
Gain on sale of property and equipment		(1,000	)		(48,788	)
Decrease in provision for doubtful accounts		-			(305,432	)
Effect of currency translation		(10,791	)		10,241
Gain on settlement of debt		-			(77,197	)
Stock-based compensation		58,978			405,740
Unrealized loss on marketable securities		49,005			-
Unrealized loss on warrant liability		379,336			20,147
Gain on settlement of of convertible preference shares		-			(189,669	)
Changes in non-cash operating working capital
Accounts receivable		(65,989	)		(6,384	)
Due to/from related parties		9,226			(328,382	)
Prepaid expenses and deposits		(25,037	)		3,459
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		12,905			(292,449	)
		(1,916,949	)		(1,867,587	)
Cash flow from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of equipment		1,000			48,789
Finance lease payments		-			(6,960	)
Mineral property acquisition		-			(18,099	)
Equipment additions		-			(19,803	)
		1,000			3,927
Cash flow from financing activities
Share subscriptions, net of issuance costs		1,963,556			2,777,200
Increase in cash		47,607			913,540
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		917,495			3,955
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	965,102		$	917,495

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

1. Nature of Operations and Going Concern

Emgold Mining Corporation (“the Company”) is incorporated under the British Columbia Corporations Act and the principal place of business is located at 1400-570 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3P1. The Company is in the process of exploring its mineral property interests and has not yet determined whether its mineral property interests contain mineral reserves that are economically recoverable.

The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on April 19, 2012.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has yet to generate revenue from mining operations or pay dividends and is unlikely to do so in the immediate or foreseeable future. Historically the Company has funded its operations through the issuance of common shares. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations and the attainment of profitable operations. Management plans to raise additional funds through equity financings in order to fund future operations. As at December 31, 2011, the Company has accumulated losses of $50,183,149.

These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Statement of compliance

These consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).

The adoption of IFRS resulted in changes to the accounting policies as compared with the most recent annual financial statements prepared under Canadian GAAP. The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented. They also have been applied in the preparation of an opening IFRS statement of financial position as at January 1, 2010, as required by IFRS 1, First Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS 1"). The impact of the transition from Canadian GAAP to IFRS is explained in note 15.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

(b) Basis of presentation

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, with the exception of financial instruments classified as at fair value through profit or loss and available-for-sale which are measured at fair value.

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Idaho-Maryland Mining Corporation, Emgold (US) Corp. and Golden Bear Ceramics Company. All inter-company transactions are eliminated on consolidation.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit with banks and short-term interest-bearing investments with maturities of 90 days or less from the original date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents are recorded at fair value and changes in fair value are reflected in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. The Company had $Nil cash equivalents as at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

(d)

Financial instruments

Financial assets

Financial assets are classified as either financial assets at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”), loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments (“HTM”), or available-for-sale financial assets (“AFS”), as appropriate at initial recognition and, except in very limited circumstances, the classification is not changed subsequent to initial recognition. The classification is determined at initial recognition and depends on the nature and purpose of the financial asset. A financial asset is derecognized when its contractual rights to the asset’s cash flows expire or if substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset are transferred.

Financial assets at FVTPL

A financial asset is classified as FVTPL when the financial asset is held-for-trading or it is designated upon initial recognition as an FVTPL. A financial asset is classified as held-for- trading if (1) it has been acquired principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing in the near term; (2) it is part of an identified portfolio of financial instruments that the Company manages and has an actual pattern of short-term profit taking; or (3) it is a derivative that is not designated and effective as a hedging instrument. Financial assets at FVTPL are carried in the consolidated statements of financial position at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred. The Company has classified cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities as FVTPL.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

(d)

Financial instruments - continued

Loans and receivables

Trade receivables, loans and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or issue, and are subsequently carried at amortized cost less losses for impairment. The impairment loss of receivables is based on a review of all outstanding amounts at period end. Bad debts are written off during the period in which they are identified. Amortized cost is calculated taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and includes fees that are an integral part of the effective interest rate and transaction costs. Gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss when the loans and receivables are derecognized or impaired, as well as through the depreciation process. The Company has classified accounts receivable and due from related party as loans and receivables.

AFS financial assets

Non-derivative financial assets not included in the above categories are classified as AFS financial assets. They are carried at fair value with changes in fair value generally recognized in other comprehensive loss and accumulated in the AFS reserve. Impairment losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Purchases and sales of AFS financial assets are recognized on settlement date with any change in fair value between trade date and settlement date being recognized in the AFS reserve. On sale, the cumulative gain or loss recognized in other comprehensive income is reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company has not designated any of its financial assets as AFS.

Impairment of financial assets

The Company assesses at each reporting date whether a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or group of financial assets is deemed to be impaired, if, and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that has occurred after the initial recognition of the asset and that event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or the group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated.

For financial assets carried at amortized cost, the amount of the impairment is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the asset’s original effective rate.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

(d)

Financial instrument - continued

Impairment of financial assets - continued

The carrying amount of all financial assets, excluding accounts receivable, is directly reduced by the impairment loss. The carrying amount of trade receivables is reduced through the use of an allowance account. Associated allowances are written off when there is no realistic prospect of future recovery and all collateral has been realized or has been transferred to the Company. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss. A provision for impairment is made in relation to accounts receivable, and an impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss when there is objective evidence that the Company will not be able to collect all of the amounts due under the original terms. With the exception of AFS equity instruments, if in a subsequent period the amount of impairment loss decreases and the decrease relates to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed through the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. On the date of impairment reversal, the carrying amount of the financial asset cannot exceed its amortized cost had the impairment not been recognized.

Effective interest method

The effective interest method calculates the amortized cost of a financial instrument asset or liability and allocates interest income over the corresponding period. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts estimated future cash receipts over the expected life of the financial asset or liability, or where appropriate, a shorter period. Income is recognized on an effective interest basis for debt instruments other than those financial assets classified as FVTPL.

Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities are classified as financial liabilities as FVTPL, or other financial liabilities, as appropriate upon initial recognition. A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability is discharged, cancelled or expired.

Financial liabilities classified as other financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to the initial recognition, other financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. The Company’s other financial liabilities include accounts payables and accrued liabilities and due to related party.

Financial liabilities are classified as FVTPL if they are acquired for the purpose of selling in the near term. This category includes derivative financial instruments (including separated embedded derivatives) unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments. Gains or losses on liabilities classified as FVTPL are recognized in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. The Company’s financial liabilities classified as FVTPL include the warrant liability.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

(d)

Financial instrument - continued

Financial instruments carried at fair value

Financial instruments recorded at fair value on the statements of financial position are classified using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:

Level 1

valuation based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2

valuation techniques based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and

Level 3

valuation techniques using inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).

As of December 31, 2011 the fair values of cash and cash equivalents and the marketable securities consisting of common shares (valued using quoted prices (unadjusted) from an active market) have been measured using level 1 inputs. Marketable securities consisting of common share purchase warrants and the warrant liability, both instruments having their fair value determined using the Black-Scholes model, have been measured using level 3 inputs.

(e) Property and equipment

Equipment is recorded at cost and depreciation begins when the asset is put into service. depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over five years for plant and field equipment, office furniture and equipment, research equipment and vehicles and over three years for computer hardware and software, and over the term of the lease for leasehold improvements.

(f) Mineral property interests

Mineral property acquisition costs are capitalized and deferred until the mineral property to which they relate is placed into production, sold, allowed to lapse, or is determined to be impaired. These costs are amortized on a units-of-production basis following commencement of commercial production or will be written off or down if the property is sold, allowed to lapse, or is determined to be impaired.

Mineral property acquisition costs include cash costs and the fair value of common shares, based on the trading price of the shares, issued for mineral property interests pursuant to the terms of the related property agreement. Payments relating to a property acquired under an option or joint venture agreement, where payments are made at the sole discretion of the Company, are recorded as mineral property costs upon payment.

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, in accordance with industry standards for the current stage of exploration of such properties, these procedures do not guarantee a clear title. Property title may be subject to unregistered prior agreements and regulatory requirements. Administrative, property investigation, and exploration and evaluation expenditures are expensed in the period incurred.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

(g) Exploration and evaluation costs

Exploration and development expenditures are expensed until the Company has determined that the property is economically viable and a production decision is made.

(h) Impairment of non-financial assets

At the end of each reporting period, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of its non-financial assets with finite lives to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. Where such an indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less cost to sell or its value in use. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. In addition, long-lived assets that are not amortized are subject to an annual impairment assessment.

(i) Option and royalty agreements

Option payments and certain royalties are made at the discretion of the optionee and, accordingly, are accounted for on a cash basis. Option payments received are treated as a reduction of the carrying value of the related mineral property until the Company’s option and royalty payments received are in excess of costs incurred and then are credited to the statement of loss.

(j) Translation of foreign currencies

These consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars (“$”), which is the Company’s functional and presentation currency. References to Cdn$ represent Canadian dollars. The functional currency for the Company’s subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates which is United States dollars. Transactions entered into by the Company’s subsidiary in a currency other than the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates (its "functional currency") are recorded at the rates ruling when the transactions occur except depreciation and depreciation which are translated at the rates of exchange applicable to the related assets, with any gains or losses recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current rates of exchange with the resulting gain or losses recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. Exchange differences arising on the retranslation of unsettled monetary assets and liabilities are recognized immediately in consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated using the historical exchange rates. Non-monetary assets and liabilities measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value is determined.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

(k) Flow-through common shares

Flow-through shares are a unique Canadian tax incentive. They are the subject of specific guidance under US GAAP, but there is no equivalent IFRS guidance. Therefore, the Company has adopted a policy whereby flow-through proceeds are allocated between the offering of the common shares and the sale of tax benefits when the common shares are offered. The allocation is made based on the difference between the quoted price of the common shares and the amount the investor pays for the flow-through shares. A liability is recognized for the premium paid by the investors and is then derecognized in the period of renunciation. The recognition of a deferred income tax liability upon renunciation of the flow-through expenditures is recorded as income tax expense in the period of renunciation.

(l) Income taxes

Income tax expense consists of current and deferred tax expense. Income tax expense is recognized in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.

Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute current income tax assets and liabilities are measured at future anticipated tax rates, which have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current tax assets and current tax liabilities are only offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off the amounts, and the Company intends to settle on a net basis, or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

Deferred taxation is provided on all qualifying temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets are only recognized to the extent that it is probable that the deductible temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized.

Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognized for temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax bases of investments in controlled entities where the parent entity is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and when the deferred tax balances relate to the same taxation authority.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

(m) Provisions and contingencies

Provisions are recognized when a legal or constructive obligation exists, as a result of past events, and it is probable that an outflow of resources that can be reliably estimated will be required to settle the obligation. Where the effect is material, the provision is discounted using an appropriate current market-based pre-tax discount rate. The increase in the provision due to passage of time is recognized as interest expense.

When a contingency substantiated by confirming events can be reliably measured and is probable to result in an economic outflow, a liability is recognized as the best estimate required to settle the obligation. A contingent liability is disclosed where the existence of an obligation will only be confirmed by future events, or where the amount of a present obligation cannot be measured reliably or will probably not result in an economic outflow. Contingent assets are only disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable. When the economic benefit becomes virtually certain, the asset is no longer contingent and is recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

(n) Loss per common share

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss applicable by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the reporting period and all additional common shares for the assumed exercise of options and warrants outstanding for the reporting period, if dilutive. The treasury stock method is used for the assumed proceeds upon the exercise of options and warrants that are used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the reporting period. As the Company is incurring losses, basic and diluted loss per share are the same since including the exercise of outstanding options and share purchase warrants in the diluted loss per share calculation would be anti-dilutive.

(o) Share-based payments

Equity-settled share-based payments for directors, officers and employees are measured at fair value at the date of grant and recorded as compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed over the vesting period based on the Company’s estimate of shares that will eventually vest. The number of forfeitures likely to occur is estimated on grant date and adjusted to actual. Any consideration paid by directors, officers, employees and consultants on exercise of equity-settled share-based payments is credited to share capital. Shares are issued from treasury upon the exercise of equity-settled share-based instruments.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

(o) Share-based payments - continued

Compensation expense on stock options granted to non-employees is measured at the earlier of the completion of performance and the date the options are vested using the fair value method and is recorded as an expense in the same period as if the Company had paid cash for the goods or services received.

When the value of goods or services received in exchange for the share-based payment cannot be reliably estimated, the fair value is measured by use of a Black-Scholes valuation model. The expected life used in the model is adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations.

(p) Significant accounting judgments and estimates

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual outcomes could differ from these estimates. These consolidated financial statements include estimates that, by their nature, are uncertain. The impacts of such estimates are pervasive throughout the consolidated financial statements, and may require accounting adjustments based on future occurrences. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods. These estimates are based on historical experience, current and future economic conditions and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

(q) Critical accounting estimates

Significant assumptions about the future that management has made that could result in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities, in the event that actual results differ from assumptions made, relate to, but are not limited to, the following:

(i)

the recoverability of costs incurred to purchase mineral property interests;

(ii)

the inputs used in accounting for share based payment transactions and in valuation of warrants included in marketable securities and warrant liability; and

(iii)

management assumption of no material provisions or obligations, based on the facts and circumstances that existed during the period.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

3. Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective

The Company has reviewed new and revised accounting pronouncements that have been issued but are not yet effective and determined that the following may have an impact on the Company:

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (“IFRS 9”) was issued by the IASB on November 12, 2009 and will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (“IAS 39”). IFRS 9 replaces the multiple rules in IAS 39 with a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value and a new mixed measurement model for debt instruments having only two categories: amortized cost and fair value. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments in the context of its business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. The new standard also requires a single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of IFRS 9 on its consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (“IFRS 10”) establishes principles for the presentation and preparation of consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more other entities. IFRS 10 supersedes IAS 27 “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements” and SIC-12 “Consolidated – Special Purpose Entities” and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements (“IFRS 11”) establishes principles for financial reporting by parties to a joint arrangement. IFRS 11 supersedes the current IAS 31 “Interests in Joint Ventures” and SIC-13 “Jointly Controlled Entities – Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers” and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (“IFRS 12”) applies to entities that have an interest in a subsidiary, a joint arrangement, an associate or an unconsolidated structured entity. IFRS 12 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurements (“IFRS 13”) defines fair value, sets out in a single IFRS framework for measuring fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. IFRS 13 applies to IFRS that require or permit fair value measurements or disclosures about fair value measurements (and measurements, such as fair value less costs to sell, based on fair value or disclosures about those measurements), except in specified circumstances. IFRS 13 is to be applied for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars

3. Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective - continued

IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: disclosures (“IFRS 7”). The Accounting Standards Board ["AcSB"] approved the incorporation of the IASB's amendments to IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures and the related amendment to IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards into Part I of the Handbook. These amendments were made to Part I in January 2011 and are effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011. Earlier application is permitted. The amendments relate to required disclosures for transfers of financial assets to help users of the financial statements evaluate the risk exposures relating to such transfers and the effect of those risks on an entity's financial position. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of IFRS 7 on its consolidated financial statements

4. Marketable Securities

Pursuant to the terms of the Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement (note 6), on January 31, 2011, Valterra issued to the Company 50,000 units consisting of one common share and one share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of Valterra at $0.10 for a five year period. On the date of issue the common shares were valued at $3,268 and the warrants were valued at $1,637 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: 2 year term, 99% volatility, risk free interest rate of 1.64% and a dividend rate of Nil.

Pursuant to an amendment of the Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement (note 6), on February 11, 2011, Valterra issued to the Company 600,000 units consisting of one common share and one share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of Valterra at $0.10 for a two year period. On the date of issue the common shares were valued at $42,870 and the warrants were valued at $18,301 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: 2 year term, 99% volatility, risk free interest rate of 1.64% and a dividend rate of Nil.

As at December 31, 2011, the common shares and warrants of Valterra were revalued at fair market value of $17,071 resulting in an unrealized loss on marketable securities of $49,005. The fair value of the warrants ($3,304) was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: 1.46 year term, 135% volatility, risk free interest rate of 1.01% and a dividend rate of Nil.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

5. Property and Equipment

December 31, 2011
	Accumulated
	Net Book
	Cost				Depreciation
	Value
Plant and field equipment	$	15,656	$	15,656	$	-
Office furniture and equipment		46,164		39,485		6,679
Computer hardware and software		71,945		60,448		11,497
Vehicle - held under capital lease		38,833		38,833		-

	$	172,598	$	154,422	$	18,176

December 31, 2010

	Accumulated
	Net Book
	Cost				Depreciation
	Value
Plant and field equipment	$	39,306	$	39,253	$	53
Office furniture and equipment		63,668		53,722		9,946
Computer hardware and software		80,002		63,171		16,831
Vehicle - held under capital lease		38,833		33,008		5,825

	$	221,809	$	189,154	$	32,655

6. Mineral Property Interests

	December 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Mineral property acquisition costs
Idaho-Maryland Property, California	$	747,219	$	747,219
Buckskin Rawhide Property, Nevada		39,052		25,233
Stewart Property, British Columbia		199,667		199,667
Rozan Gold Property, British Columbia		49,225		115,301

	$	1,035,163	$	1,087,420

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

6. Mineral Property Interests - continued

Idaho-Maryland Property, California

In fiscal 2002, the Company renegotiated a lease with the owners of the Idaho-Maryland Property (“I-M Property”) and surrounding areas in the Grass Valley Mining District, California.

The owners granted to the Company the exclusive right and option to purchase all of the leased property. The property is subject to a 3% Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”) from production if the property is still being leased. Any royalty payments made prior to exercising the purchase option may be deducted from the purchase price. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company extended the lease and option agreement from February 1, 2011, for an additional two years to February 1, 2013. Lease payments during the extension period will be $30,000 per quarter. In conjunction with the extension, the lessors agreed to defer payments for 2010 totaling $120,000. Under the terms of the deferral, this amount will now be added to the purchase price of the I-M Property, the first installment of which becomes due on February 1, 2013. The $120,000 will be subject to interest calculated at 5.25% compounded annually.

Provided that payments are kept current, the Company may purchase the property at any time. The purchase price at February 1, 2013, would be $6,154,717, and is being increased by 3% each lease-year. In April 2004, the Company acquired a parcel of land adjacent to other properties under option by the Company in Grass Valley, California from a non-related party, in addition to the purchase of mining rights from another non-related party on other claims for a total of $589,276 in mineral property acquisition costs.

In 2009, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 7.13 acres of land known as the "Whisper Property". Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to a one-time share issuance of 280,823 common shares at a market price of Cdn$0.55 per share on the date of filing to the seller for the purchase of the Whisper Property. No common shares were issued as bonuses, finder's fees or commissions in connection with this transaction. The common shares issued pursuant to the agreement are subject to a hold period of four (4) months, plus one (1) day from the date of issuance.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

6. Mineral Property Interests - continued

Buckskin Rawhide Property, Nevada

In January 2010 the Company completed a lease and option to purchase agreement to acquire 100% of the rights to the Buckskin Rawhide mineral claims, a gold prospect located near Fallon, Nevada. The Company has agreed to lease the property from Nevada Sunrise, LLC subject to the following advance royalty payments: $10,000 annually for the years 2009 to 2011; $20,000 in 2012; $40,000 in 2013, and $60,000 from 2014 to 2019. During the lease period, the Company may conduct exploration and, if warranted, complete a NI 43 101 compliant feasibility study. On completion of the feasibility study, the Company may acquire 100% ownership of the property by paying Nevada Sunrise, LLC an additional amount of $250,000. Nevada Sunrise, LLC is required to use these funds to purchase a retained 25% interest in the property from Maurice and Lorraine Castagne, pursuant to an underlying property agreement, and to transfer that title to the Company. Upon commercial production and after acquisition of 100% interest in the property, Nevada Sunrise, LLC will be entitled to a 2.5% NSR on production from the property. The annual lease payments of $10,000 due in December 2011 and 2010 were paid by the issuance of 106,290 and 49,424 common shares, respectively.

Rozan Gold Property, British Columbia

In 2000, the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire the rights to the Rozan Gold Property, a prospect located in British Columbia. The Company holds a 100% interest in the property, subject to a 3.0% NSR. The Company has the right to purchase 66% of the royalty for the sum of Cdn$1,000,000 and has the first right of refusal to purchase the remaining 33%.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company entered into a Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Valterra Resource Corporation (“Valterra”). The Agreement calls for cumulative work commitments of $1,000,000 over 5 years, with a commitment of $50,000 in 2010, $200,000 in 2011, and $250,000 in each of years 3 to 5.

The term of the Agreement is for a period of 5 years, with property payments of cash, common shares and 5-year warrants to be made by Valterra to the Company during the lease as follows:

			5 Year
Period	CDN$	Shares	Warrants

Signing	Nil	50,000	50,000
Year 1	$30,000	50,000	50,000
Year 2	$30,000	50,000	50,000
Year 3	$40,000	50,000	50,000
Year 4	$40,000	50,000	50,000
Year 5	$60,000	100,000	100,000

Total	$200,000	350,000	350,000

The price of the warrants will be equal to the price of the common shares at the time of issuance.

On January 31, 2011 the Company received the Year 1 share payment of 50,000 common shares and a warrant certificate representing 50,000 warrants of Valterra Resource Corporation.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

6. Mineral Property Interests - continued

Rozan Gold Property, British Columbia - continued

On February 8, 2011 the Company signed an amendment agreement to the Agreement whereby the Company agreed to accept securities of Valterra in satisfaction of the $30,000 cash payment due on the effective date of the agreement. Subsequent to this agreement, the Company received 600,000 Units of Valterra at a deemed price of $0.05 per Unit, each Unit comprising one common share of Valterra and one warrant, each such warrant exercisable to acquire one additional share at an exercise price of $0.10 per Share for a period of 24 months from the date of issue.

Upon completion of the lease payments and work commitments, Valterra will acquire the Rozan Property, subject to an underlying NSR. Valterra will use its best efforts to complete a NI 43-101 resource estimate for the property by year 5, subject to results obtained from exploration and development work.

Under the agreement with Valterra, should the Company elect to acquire two thirds of the NSR currently held by the original optionors, or a 2% NSR, Valterra will have 30 days to exercise an option to obtain half of this interest (a 1% NSR) for Cdn$500,000. The Company will use this payment as part of the required payment to acquire the 2% NSR from the original optionors and will then transfer the 1% NSR to Valterra. Should Valterra elect not to exercise its option at this time, it shall retain a further option to acquire the 1% NSR from the Company at a future date for Cdn$750,000. The Company will retain its first right of refusal with the original optionors to acquire the remaining 1% of their NSR, should they elect to sell it to a third party. Should the Company obtain this 1% NSR, Valterra shall have first right of refusal if the Company elects to sell it to a third party.

In January 2012, after failing to meet its work commitments on the Rozan Gold Property, Valterra announced that it has elected to terminate the Agreement with the Company.

Stewart Property, British Columbia

Pursuant to an option agreement entered into in 2001 and completed in 2008, the Company acquired the rights to the Stewart mineral claims, a prospect located close to Nelson in south eastern British Columbia. The Company holds a 100% right, title and interest in and to the property, subject only to a 3% NSR payable to the optionors. The Company has the right to purchase 66% of the royalty for the sum of Cdn$1,000,000 and has the first right of refusal to purchase the remaining 33%. The Company has staked six claims contiguous to the Stewart Property located in south-eastern British Columbia.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

7. Finance Lease Obligation

The Company leases a vehicle under a capital lease which expires in 2012 and bears simple interest at a rate of 8.69%. In December, 2011 the Company exercised the buy-out by paying $5,474.

8. Convertible Preference Shares

The 394,843 Class A Convertible Preference Shares were issued in fiscal 2003 in full satisfaction of an aggregate Cdn$789,686 of indebtedness owing to related parties. In conjunction with the share consolidation discussed in note 9(a), the Company also amended the conversion ratio of the Class A Convertible Preference Shares. The Class A Convertible Preference Shares were voting, with no fixed term and ranked in priority to the Company’s common shares and were entitled to fixed cumulative preferential dividends at a rate of 7% per annum. The shares were redeemable by the Company at any time after 30 days written notice at a redemption price of Cdn$2.00 per share, but were redeemable by the holder only out of funds available that are not, in the Company’s opinion, otherwise required for the development of the Company’s mineral property interests or to maintain a minimum of Cdn$2,000,000 in working capital. The Class A Convertible Preference Shares were convertible, at the option of the holder, into common shares at any time at a ratio of one common share for each Class A Convertible Preference Shares. The Preference Shares also had attached a gold redemption feature by which holders may elect at the time of any proposed redemption to receive gold valued at $300 per ounce in lieu of cash, provided the Company had on hand at the time, gold having an aggregate value of not less than the redemption amount. This was at the Company’s option.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

8. Convertible Preference Shares - continued

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the holders of the Convertible Preference Shares agreed to convert all of the Series A Preference Shares and related accrued interest and dividends into common shares of the Company in return for the receipt of 2,813,575 units of the Company. Each unit comprised one common share and one purchase warrant. Each share purchase warrant was exercisable at a price of $0.35, with an expiry date of September 9, 2015. The fair value of the 2,813,575 shares issued as part of the units total and the 394,843 shares issued upon conversion of debt totaled $589,725. The warrants were valued at $479,587 using a Black-Scholes method and the following assumptions: a volatility of 170.6%, an expected life of five years, no dividend and a discount rate of 2.56. The total gain arising was $189,669 which has been recorded in the statements of loss and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2010.

9 Share Capital

Authorized

Unlimited

Number of common shares without par value

Unlimited

Number of preference shares without par value

(a) Common shares, issued and fully paid

At the Annual and Special General Meeting of its shareholders held on September 18, 2009, the shareholders approved a special resolution to alter the Company’s authorized share structure by consolidating all of the issued and outstanding common shares without par value, of which 168,972,873 pre-consolidation common shares were issued, on the basis of ten (10) pre-consolidation common shares to one (1) post-consolidation common share, after adjusting for rounding, or 16,894,310 post-consolidation common shares. In addition, the issued and outstanding Class A preference shares were consolidated on the same basis, resulting in 394,843 Class A preference shares, after consolidation. The share consolidation of the common shares without par value and the Class A preference shares was effective December 21, 2009. All periods presented have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse split.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

9. Share Capital - continued

(a) Common shares, issued and fully paid - continued

Financing

December 31, 2011

In November, 2011 the Company completed the first tranche of a non-brokered private placement which comprised 11,620,000 units at a price of Cdn$0.10 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one additional share at a price of Cdn$0.15. The share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 101% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the share purchase warrants was $392,614.

Finder’s fees of Cdn$53,600 and 536,000 finder’s warrants were awarded in relation to the first tranche of the financing. Each finder’s warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.15. The finder warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 101% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder's warrants was $40,845.

In December, 2011 the Company completed the second tranche of a non-brokered private placement which comprised 2,530,000 units at a price of Cdn$0.10 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one non-transferable purchase warrant (a “Warrant”). Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one additional share. The share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 102% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the share purchase warrants was $78,847.

Finder’s fees of Cdn$3,200 and 32,000 finder’s warrants were awarded in relation to the second tranche of the financing. Each finder’s warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.15. The finder warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 101% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder's warrants warrants was $1,605.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

9. Share Capital - continued

(a) Common shares, issued and fully paid - continued

Financing - continued

December 31, 2011 - continued

In December, 2011 the Company completed a non-brokered private placement of flow-through units for gross proceeds of $767,750. A total of 5,905,769 units were issued at a price of Cdn$0.13 per unit. Each unit consists of one “flow-through” common share of the Company and one half of one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 18 months, one additional common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.20 per share. The share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 109% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the share purchase warrants was $117,359. A $NIL flow-through premium related to this private placement.

Finder’s fees of Cdn$49,920 and 383,999 finder’s warrants were awarded in relation to the flow-through financing. 269,230 of the finder’s warrants entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 18 months, one additional common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.15 and 114,769 at a price of Cdn$0.20 for a period of 18 months. The finder warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 109% and an expected life of 1.5 years. The total value ascribed to the finder's warrants was $18,514.

The Shares issued in connection with these non-brokered private placements, including any issued on the exercise of the warrants, will be subject to a minimum hold period of four months.

December 31, 2010

In April, 2010 the Company completed a non-brokered private placement raising gross proceeds of $750,000. A total of 3,000,000 units were issued at a price of $0.25 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one additional common share of the Company at a price of $0.35. The shares and warrants issued in connection with this non-brokered private placement are subject to a minimum hold period of four months. Finder's fees of $76,797 and 192,000 finder’s warrants were awarded in relation to the first tranche of the financing. The finder’s warrants have the same terms as the warrants included in the units sold to purchasers except for an exercise price of $0.25. The finder's warrants and share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.78%, volatility factors of 89% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder’s warrants and share purchase warrants was $198,869.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

9. Share Capital - continued

(a) Common shares, issued and fully paid - continued

Financing - continued

December 31, 2010 - continued

On September 24, 2010, the Company completed a first tranche of a private placement, which comprised 5,203,856 units at a price of $0.14, comprising one common share and one warrant, exercisable for $0.35 for a period of 24 months. Finder's fees of $15,680 and 112,000 finder’s warrants were awarded in relation to the first tranche of the financing. The finder’s warrants have the same terms as the warrants included in the units sold to purchasers. The finder’s warrants and share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.35%, volatility factors of 94% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder’s warrants and share purchase warrants was $149,353.

On October 14, 2010, the Company closed the second and final tranche of the non-brokered private placement, of 7,296,142 units. Finder's fees of $75,673 and 540,491 finder's warrants were paid in relation to the second tranche of the financing. Each finder's warrant entitles its holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one additional common share of the Company at a price of US$0.35. In total, 12,499,998 units were issued at the price of $0.14 per unit to raise gross proceeds of approximately $1,750,000. The shares, the warrants, the finder’s warrants and any common shares issued on exercise of the warrants or the finder's warrants were subject to a minimum hold period of four months. The finder’s warrants and share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.35%, volatility factors of 92% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder’s warrants and share purchase warrants was $319,133.

On December 22, 2010 the Company completed a non-brokered private placement financing of 2,272,727 flow-through units at a price of Cdn$0.22 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$500,000. Each unit consists of one flow-through common share and one-half of one transferable non-flow-through share purchase warrant, totaling 1,136,363 warrants. Each warrant is exercisable for a period of two years from the date of issue at a price of Cdn$0.30 per share. The proceeds will be used for exploration projects in British Columbia. Finder's fees of Cdn$35,000 and 159,090 finder's warrants were awarded in relation to the financing. Each finder's warrant entitles its holder to purchase, for a period of 2 years, one additional common share of the Company at a price of US$0.30. The Finder's Warrants and share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.38%, volatility factors of 99% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder's warrants and share purchase warrants was $103,022.

A finder’s fee of Cdn$35,000 was paid in association with this financing. In addition, the Company has issued 159,090 warrants to the finder, which will entitle the finder to acquire the number of common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.23 per share at any time, subject to a hold period, and from time to time, on or before December 21, 2012.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

9. Share Capital - continued

(b) Stock options

				Weighted Average
	Number of			Exercise
	Options			Price (Cdn$)

Outstanding, December 31, 2009		1,288,250		$	3.85
Granted		2,078,998		$	0.25
Cancelled and forfeited		(243,250	)	$	5.55
Expired		(10,000	)	$	3.60

Balance, December 31, 2010		3,113,998		$	1.37
Expired		(65,500	)	$	0.175
Cancelled and forfeited		(175,833	)	$	0.210

Balance, December 31, 2011		2,872,665		$	0.23

The following table summarizes information about the stock options outstanding at December 31, 2011:

	Number Outstanding	Weighted Average
Exercise	and Exercisable	Remaining
Price (Cdn$)	December 31, 2011	Contractual Life

$0.175	600,000	0.95 years
$0.175	97,500	1.36 years
$0.175	143,500	1.89 years
$0.175	65,000	2.53 years
$0.25	466,665	3.21 years
$0.25	1,500,000	3.94 years

	2,872,665	2.94 years

For the year ended December 31, 2011, a total of 405,700 incentive stock options granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the the Company with exercise prices ranging from Cdn$1.00 to Cdn$10.00 were repriced to $0.175 per share. The expiry dates, ranging from October 12, 2011 to July 12, 2014, remain unchanged.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

9. Share Capital - continued

(b) Stock options - continued

For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred stock-based compensation expense, related to the re-pricing noted above, of $58,979 (December 31, 2010 - $405,739) of which $13,166 (December 31, 2010 - $105,092) is classified within exploration and evaluation costs.

The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with weighted average assumptions as follows:

	December 31,		December 31
	2011		2010

Risk-free interest rate		1.68%		2.2%
		2.18 years		3.8 years
Expected volatility		101%		112.3%
Weighted average fair value per
option granted	$	0.19	$	0.18

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that are fully transferable and have no vesting restrictions. The Company’s stock options are not transferable and cannot be traded, thus the Black-Scholes model may over-estimate the actual value of the options that the Company has granted. The Black-Scholes model also requires an estimate of expected volatility. The Company uses historical volatility rates of the Company to arrive at an estimate of expected volatility. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can impact the fair value estimate.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

9. Share Capital - continued

As at December 31, 2011, the following share purchase warrants were outstanding:



Number of Warrants	Exercise Price		Expiry Date


1,600,000	$	0.35	April 6, 2012
80,000	$	0.25	April 6, 2012
1,400,000	$	0.35	April 23, 2012
112,000	$	0.25	April 23, 2012
5,315,856	$	0.35	September 30, 2012
2,813,575	$	0.35	September 9, 2015
7,836,633	$	0.35	October 4, 2012
1,136,363	Cdn$	0.30	December 21, 2012
159,090	Cdn$	0.22	December 21, 2012
11,620,000	Cdn$	0.15	November 21, 2013
536,000	Cdn$	0.15	November 21, 2013
2,530,000	Cdn$	0.15	December 21, 2013
32,000	Cdn$	0.15	December 21, 2013
2,235,577	Cdn$	0.25	June 22, 2013
269,230	Cdn$	0.15	June 23, 2013
717,308	Cdn$	0.20	June 28, 2013
114,769	Cdn$	0.20	June 28, 2013

38,508,401

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

9. Share Capital - continued

The following table summarizes warrant transactions for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:


				Weighted Average
	Shares			Exercise Price

Balance, December 31, 2009		861,500		$	1.12
Issued		20,453,517		$	0.35

Balance, December 31, 2010		21,315,017		$	0.35
Issued		18,054,884		$	0.16
Expired		(861,500	)	$	1.60
Balance, December 31, 2011		38,508,401		$	0.27

In accordance with IFRS, an obligation to issue shares for a price that is not fixed in the Company's functional currency, and that does not qualify as a rights offering, must be classified as a derivative liability and measured at fair value with changes recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss as they arise. The Company has issued share purchase warrants (see note 9(a)) whereby the exercise price is denominated in $Cdn. As a result these share purchase warrants must be accounted for as a liability. As at December 31, 2011 the Company recorded a warrant liability in the amount of $1,079,253 (December 31, 2010 - $111,458). The warrants were valued upon issuance (see note 9(a)) and subsequently revalued on December 31, 2011 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 0.92%, volatility factors of 104% and an expected life of 1.78 years. An unrealized loss on warrant liability of $379,336 has been recorded on the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss for the year ending December 31, 2011.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

10.	Income Taxes

(a)

Income tax recovery

The following table shows the components of the current and deferred tax expense.


	December 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
Loss before recovery of income taxes	$	(2,338,100	)	$	(1,080,200	)
Expected income tax recovery	$	(619,600	)	$	(307,900	)
Non-deductible amounts		411,600			90,700
Differences in foreign tax rates		197,600			(90,900	)
Expiry of tax losses and other		277,000			400,300
Effect of changes in rates on future tax		(42,300	)		10,700
Differences in foreign exchange rates		673,700			(370,400	)
Change in valuation allowance		(898,000	)		267,500

Net deferred income tax assets	$	-		$	-

(b)

Unrecognized deferred tax assets

Deferred income taxes are provided as a result of temporary differences that arise due to the differences between the income tax values and the carrying amount of assets and liabilities. Deferred income tax assets have not been recognized in respect of the following items:

	December 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010

Future Income Tax Assets
Non-capital losses	$	26,365,100		$	25,236,600
Mineral property interests and research costs representing
excess of tax basis over carrying value		24,990,600			25,726,600
Deductible temporary differences		980,900			999,100
Valuation allowance		(52,336,600	)		(51,962,300	)

Net deferred income tax liabilities	$	-		$	-

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

10.	Income Taxes - continued

(b)Unrecognized deferred tax assets - continued


Expiry						Expiry		Canadian
Date	U.S. Tax					Date		Tax (Cdn)

2012	$	966,432					2014	$	978,036
2018		419,779	2025		1,169,211		2015		1,719,117
2019		363,828	2026		1,418,934		2026		1,561,613
2020		269,174	2027		1,951,724		2027		1,842,982
2021		154,928	2028		2,480,011		2028		1,164,279
2022		313,643	2029		1,848,103		2029		1,122,703
2023		254,921	2030		2,240,579		2030		724,406
2024		1,633,085	2031		310,277		2031		818,202

				$	11,418,839			$	9,931,338

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

11. Related Party Transactions and Balances
	December 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010

Balance receivable from
Quorum Management (a)	$	28,531	$	124,605

Balances payable to
Directors and officers	$	160,965	$	247,813

Related party transactions reflected in these consolidated financial statements are as follows:

(a)

In the year ended December 31, 2011, $186,109 (2010 - $136,396) in management, administrative, geological and other services were provided by Quorum Management and Administrative Services Inc. (“Quorum”), a private company held jointly by the Company and other public companies, to provide services on a full cost recovery basis to the various public entities currently sharing certain personnel costs, office space, and overhead with the Company. Currently, the Company has a one/third interest in Quorum. The Company advanced three months of funds to Quorum for future services. Quorum held this advance as a deposit for each shareholder company as working capital. As at December 31, 2008, the Company concluded that amounts advanced may not be recoverable in full, based on the financial position of Quorum at that time and its corresponding ability to continue to provide services to the Company. Consequently, a provision of $321,839 was recorded. Since the allowance was recorded, Quorum has continued to provide services. A recovery of $77,045 was recorded in 2009. At December 31, 2010, the Company determined that the full amount of the Quorum provision remaining of $124,605 was recoverable, and this amount was recorded as a credit in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. A distribution of income from Quorum in the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 resulted in a credit to Emgold in the amount of $43,803.

(b)

Consulting fees of $42,634 (2010 – $47,988) were paid or are accrued and payable to 759924 Ontario Ltd., a private company controlled by a director.

(c)

Consulting fees of $Nil (2010 – $20,775) were paid or are accrued and payable to Kent Avenue Consulting Ltd., a private company controlled by a director.

(d)

Related party balances are non-interest bearing and are due on demand, with no fixed terms of repayment. Transactions with related parties are recorded at normal commercial terms.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

12. Supplementary Cash Flow Information - Non-Cash Transactions


	December 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010

Financing and investing activities
Shares issued for mineral property interests	$	-	$	7,134
Shares issued for settlement of debt	$	-	$	73,886
Shares issued for conversion of accrued dividends
on preference shares	$	-	$	517,151
Warrants issued for conversion of accrued dividends
on preference shares	$	-	$	479,587
Shares issued on conversion of preference shares	$	-	$	72,574
Stock-based compensation	$	58,978	$	102,961
Finders' warrants	$	60,964	$	287,891

13. Management of Capital

The Company defines capital as its shareholders' equity. The Company’s objective in managing capital is to maintain adequate levels of funding to support permitting activities in California, maintain corporate and administrative functions necessary to support organizational management oversight, and obtain funding sufficient for advancing the Company’s other interests including the Buckskin Rawhide and Stewart properties.

The Company seeks to manage its capital structure in a manner that provides sufficient funding for operational activities. Funds are primarily secured through equity capital obtained in private placements. There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to continue raising capital in this manner. The Company currently does not use other sources of financing that require fixed payments of interest and principal due to the lack of cash flow from current operations and is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.

The Company has in the past invested its capital in short-term investments to obtain adequate returns. The investment decision is based on cash management to ensure working capital is available to meet the Company’s short-term obligations while maximizing liquidity and returns of unused capital.

Although the Company has been successful at raising funds in the past through the issuance of share capital, it is uncertain whether it will be able to continue this form of financing due to the current difficult conditions. The Company currently does not have sufficient funds to complete its permitting activities, and will need to rely on equity financing's, or forms of joint venture or other types of financing to continue the permitting process and commence exploration work and to meet its administrative overhead costs for the coming year. Additional information relating to management of capital is disclosed in note 1.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

14. Financial Instruments and Risk Management

The Company's activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk (including interest rate, foreign currency risk and commodity and equity price risk).

Risk management is carried out by the Company's management team with guidance from the Audit Committee under policies approved by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors also provides regular guidance for overall risk management.

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its obligations. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk at the statement of financial position date under its financial instruments is summarized as follows:


	December 31,
	2011

Accounts and other receivables
Currently due	$	79,225
Past due by 90 days or less not impaired		-
Past due by greater than 90 days not impaired		-

		79,225
Cash		965,102

	$	1,044,327

Substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held with major financial institutions in Canada, and management believes the exposure to credit risk with such institutions is not significant. Those financial assets that potentially subject the Company to credit risk are its receivables. The Company has increased its focus on credit risk given the impact of the current economic climate. The Company considers the risk of material loss to be significantly mitigated due to the financial strength of the major financial institutions where cash and term deposits are held. As at December 21, 2011 the Company did not hold any cash equivalents. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk as at December 31, 2011, is the carrying value of its financial assets.

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its obligations associated with financial liabilities. The Company has a planning and budgeting process in place by which it anticipates and determines the funds required to support normal operation requirements as well as the growth and development of its mineral property interests. The Company coordinates this planning and budgeting process with its financing activities through the capital management process described in note 13, in normal circumstances. Due to the lack of liquidity and anticipated working capital requirements within the next twelve months, management has increased its focus on liquidity risk given the impact of the current economic climate on the availability of finance. Further to this the Company is committed to spend $Cdn767,750 on Canadian qualifying exploration expenditures by December 31, 2012. Further information regarding liquidity risk is set out in note 1.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

14. Financial Instruments and Risk Management - continued

Liquidity risk - continued

The Company’s financial liabilities are comprised of its accounts payable and accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties, the contractual maturities of which at December 31, 2011, are summarized as follows:


	December 31,
	2011

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities with contractual maturities -
Within 90 days or less	$	303,019
Due to related parties with contractual maturities
Within 90 days or less		160,965

	$	463,984

• Interest rate risk

The Company has no significant exposure at December 31, 2011, to interest rate risk through its financial instruments.

• Price risk

The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity and equity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. Commodity price risk is remote since the Company is not a producing entity. Equity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on the Company’s earnings due to movements in individual equity prices or general movements in the level of the stock market. The Company closely monitors individual equity movements and the stock market to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

The Company’s marketable securities consist of equity investments in one publicly listed entity. Based on management’s knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are “reasonably possible” over a twelve month period:

(i)

A variance of 100% in the market value of the Company’s marketable securities would affect loss and comprehensive loss by $17,071.

• Currency risk

The Company’s currency risk arises primarily with fluctuations in United States dollar and the Canadian dollar. The Company has no revenue and any exposure to currency risk is related to expenditures by the Company in Canada, as a significant portion of operating expenses are payable in Canadian dollars. The currency risk of the Company relates to unpaid liabilities of the Company payable in Canadian dollars.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

14. Financial Instruments and Risk Management - continued

• Currency risk - continued

The Company has not hedged its exposure to currency fluctuations. At December 31, 2011, the Company is exposed to currency risk through the following assets and liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars, but presented in United States dollar equivalents.


	December 31,
	2011

Canadian dollars
Cash	$	876,830
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	(165,393	)

Based on the above net exposures at December 31, 2011, and assuming that all other variables remain constant a 10% appreciation or depreciation of the Canadian dollar against the United States dollar would result in an increase/decrease of $71,144 in the Company’s consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

15.	IFRS Transition

As stated under Significant Accounting Policies (note 2), these consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) as issued by the IASB. The policies set out in the Significant Accounting Policies section have been applied in preparing the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, the comparative information presented in these consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 and in the preparation of an opening IFRS statement of financial position at January 1, 2010 (the Company’s date of transition).

The Company has followed the recommendations in IFRS-1 First-time adoption of IFRS, in preparing its transitional statements.

(a)

IFRS Exemptions and Choices

The adoption of IFRS requires the application of IFRS 1, which provides guidance for an entity’s initial adoption of IFRS. IFRS 1 generally requires retrospective application of IFRS as effective at the end of its first annual IFRS reporting period. However, IFRS 1 also provides certain optional exemptions and mandatory exceptions to this retrospective treatment.

The Company has elected to apply the following optional exemptions in its preparation of an opening IFRS consolidated statement of financial position as at January 1, 2010, the Company’s "Transition Date":

•

To apply IFRS 2 Share based Payments only to equity instruments that were issued after November 7, 2002 and had not vested by the Transition Date.

•

To apply IFRS 3 Business Combinations prospectively from the Transition Date, therefore not restating business combinations that took place prior to the Transition Date.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

15.	IFRS Transition - continued

(a)

IFRS Exemptions and Choices - continued

•

Cumulative currency translation adjustment - IFRS 1 does not require a first-time adopter to apply IAS 21, The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, to cumulative currency translation adjustments that existed on the IFRS transition date. The Company has elected to report only those cumulative currency translation adjustments arising after January 1, 2010. All currency translation adjustments arising prior to January 1, 2010 are reflected in retained earnings in the January 1, 2010 consolidated statement of financial position, and will not be included in the gain or loss on subsequent disposals of foreign operations.

In preparing its opening IFRS consolidated statement of financial position, the Company has adjusted amounts reported previously in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”). An explanation of how the transition from Canadian GAAP to IFRS has affected the Company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows is set out in the following tables and the additional notes that accompany the tables.

Mandatory exceptions to retrospective application

Estimates: Hindsight was not used to create or revise estimates and accordingly the estimates previously made by the Company under Canadian GAAP are consistent with their application under IFRS.

(b)

Reconciliation from Canadian GAAP to IFRS

Recognition and measurement differences exist between Canadian GAAP and IFRS in certain areas. To illustrate the effects of these differences, certain financial statements previously reported under Canadian GAAP have been reconciled to the equivalent IFRS statements, and reconciling differences explained. The adoption of IFRS has had no material impact on the cash flows of the Company, and as such, no reconciliation of prior period cash flow statements has been presented.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

15.	IFRS Transition - continued

(b) Reconciliation from Canadian GAAP to IFRS - continued

Reconciliation of equity:


				January 1, 2010
	Canadian
	GAAP			Adjustments			IFRS

Assets
Current assets	$	32,195		$	-		$	-
Property and equipment, mineral property
interest and other non-current assets		1,104,174			-			-

Total assets	$	1,136,369		$	-		$	1,136,369

Liabilities
Total current liabilities	$	1,912,403		$	-		$	1,912,403
Long-term finance lease obligations		13,306			-			13,306
Convertible preference shares (i)		727,674			27,266			754,940

Total liabilities		2,653,383			27,266			2,680,649

Shareholders' deficiency
Share capital (i and ii)		38,792,139			99,579			38,891,718
Equity component of convertible
preference shares (i)		90,902			(90,902	)		-
Warrants		112,355			-			112,355
Contributed surplus		6,223,649			-			6,223,649
Accumulated comprehensive loss (iii)		(577,456	)		577,456			-
Deficit (i, ii, iii)		(46,158,603	)		(613,399	)		(46,772,002	)
		(1,517,014	)		(27,266	)		(1,544,280	)
Total liabilities and shareholders' deficiency	$	1,136,369		$	-		$	1,136,369

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

15.	IFRS Transition - continued

(b)

Reconciliation from Canadian GAAP to IFRS - continued

Reconciliation of equity:


	December 31, 2010

	Canadian
	GAAP			Adjustments			IFRS

Assets
Current assets	$	1,115,417		$	-		$	1,115,417
Property and equipment, mineral property
interest and other non-current assets		1,134,018			-			1,134,018

Total assets	$	2,249,435		$	-		$	2,249,435

Liabilities
Total current liabilities	$	587,664		$	-		$	587,664
Long-term finance lease obligations		4,737			-			4,737
Warrant liability (iv)		-			111,458			111,458

Total liabilities		592,401			111,458			703,859

Share capital (i)		41,463,263			27,005			41,490,268
Warrants (iv)		1,362,319			(91,311	)		1,271,008
Contributed surplus (i)		6,647,717			(18,328	)		6,629,389
Accumulated comprehensive loss (iii)		(577,456	)		577,456			-
Deficit (i, ii, iii, iv)		(47,238,809	)		(606,280	)		(47,845,089	)

		1,657,034			(111,458	)		1,545,576
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	2,249,435		$	-		$	2,249,435

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

15.	IFRS Transition - continued

(b)

Reconciliation from Canadian GAAP to IFRS - continued

Reconciliation of loss and comprehensive loss


	December 31,
	2010

Loss under Canadian GAAP	$	1,080,206
Accretion of debt component of preference
shares (i)		(4,471	)
Foreign exchange on debt component of
preference shares (i)		11,005
Change in fair value of warrant liability (iv)		20,147
Gain on preference shares (i)		(33,800	)

Loss and comprehensive loss under IFRS	$	1,073,087

(i)

The convertible preference shares (note 8) were treated as a compound financial instrument with debt and equity components under Canadian GAAP. Under IFRS these convertible preference shares are classified as a liability. The change in treatment reflects the IAS 32 requirement that when a derivative financial instrument gives one party a choice over how it is settled (e.g. the issuer or the holder can choose settlement net in cash or by exchanging shares for cash), it is a financial asset or a financial liability unless all of the settlement alternatives would result in it being an equity instrument.

The effects of this transitional change, as at January 1, 2010, resulted in an increase in the convertible preference shares liability of $27,266 (December 31, 2010 - $Nil), a decrease in the equity component of convertible preference shares of $90,902 (December 31, 2010 - $Nil) a decrease of share capital in the amount of $Nil (December 31, 2010 - decrease of $72,574), a decrease in contributed surplus in the amount of $Nil (December 31, 2010 - decrease of $18,328) and a decrease in the deficit of $63,636 (March 31, 2010 -$65,951) (December 31, 2010 - $90,902).

The effects of this transitional change, for the year end December 31, 2010, resulted in a reduction of accretion on debt portion of convertible preference shares in the amount of $4,471 an increase in foreign exchange loss of $11,005 and an increase in the gain on settlement of preferred shares of $33,800.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

15.	IFRS Transition - continued

(b)

Reconciliation from Canadian GAAP to IFRS - continued

(ii)

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company followed the recommendations of the Emerging Issues Committee (“EIC”) of the CICA with respect to flow-through shares, as outlined in EIC-146. The application of EIC-146 required the recognition of the foregone tax benefit on the date the Company renounced the tax credits associated with the exploration expenditures, provided there is reasonable assurance that the expenditures will be made. To recognize the foregone tax benefits to the Company, the carrying value of the shares issued is reduced by the tax effect of the tax benefits renounced to subscribers.

As part of the transition to IFRS the Company has adopted a policy to allocate the proceeds between the offering of the shares and the sale of tax benefits when the shares are offered. The allocation is made based on the difference between the quoted price of the shares and the amount the investor pays for the flow-through shares. A liability is recognized for the premium paid by the investors. The liability is reduced and the reduction of premium liability is recorded in other income on a pro-rata basis based on the corresponding eligible expenditures that have been incurred.

Further, the corresponding reduction of share capital in respect of flow-through share financing as previously recorded under Canadian GAAP is now recorded as an expense in the statement of net loss and comprehensive loss.

The effects of this transitional change resulted in an increase in share capital and deficit of $99,579 as at January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010. There was no calculated premium on the December 22, 2010 flow-through financing.

(iii)

Cumulative currency translation adjustment - IFRS 1 does not require a first-time adopter to apply IAS 21, The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, to cumulative currency translation adjustments that existed on the IFRS transition date. The Company has elected to report only those cumulative currency translation adjustments arising after January 1, 2010. All currency translation adjustments arising prior to January 1, 2010 are reflected in retained earnings in the January 1, 2010 statement of financial position, and will not be included in the gain or loss on subsequent disposals of foreign operations.

The effects of this transitional change resulted in a decrease in other accumulated comprehensive loss and an increase in deficit of $577,456 as at January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010.

(iv)

The Company issued certain warrants with Cdn$ dollar exercise prices in connection with private placement financing in fiscal 2010. These warrants entitle the holder to acquire a fixed number of common shares for a fixed Cdn dollar price per share. In accordance with IFRS, an obligation to issue shares for a price that is not fixed in the Company’s functional currency, and that does not qualify as a rights offering, must be classified as a derivative liability and measured at fair value with changes recognized in the statement of income as they arise. The Company has recorded these changes in other gains and losses. Under Canadian GAAP, these warrants were classified as equity and changes in fair value were not recognized.

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

16.	Exploration and Evaluation Costs

						Cumulative
						Total of
	Year ended December 31,					December 31,
	2011		2010			2011

Idaho - Maryland Property, California
Exploration cost
Assay and analysis	$	-	$	-		$	100,140
Community relations		-		-			80,561
Drilling		-		-			1,039,920
Geological and geochemical		309,385		316,223			4,697,548
Land lease and taxes		153,954		177,695			1,660,106
Consulting		-		-			209,713
Mine planning		298,995		71,646			4,741,833
Site activities		-		-			1,672,390
Stock-based compensation		13,166		105,093			599,943
Transportation		-		-			128,250

Incurred during the year		775,500		670,657			14,930,404

Buckskin Rawhide Property, Nevada
Exploration cost
Geological and geochemical		26,890		1,275			28,165
Site activities		1,206		3,910			5,116

Incurred during the year		28,096		5,185			33,281

Rozan Gold Property, British Columbia
Exploration costs
Assay and analysis		-		-			11,803
Geological and geochemical		-		1,076			123,388
Drilling		-		-			64,050
Site-activities		-		256			22,044
Stock-based compensation		-		-			16,055
Trenching		-		-			4,666
Transportation		-		-			12,354
Assistance and recovery		-		(2,529	)		(7,322	)

Incurred during the year		-		(1,197	)		247,038

Emgold Mining Corporation

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(expressed in United States Dollars)

16. Exploration and Evaluation Costs - continued

Stewart Property, British Columbia
Exploration cost
Assay and analysis		60,555		-			156,712
Drilling		321,087		-			851,143
Geological and geochemical		101,844		431			322,992
Site-activities		9,835		35			31,346
Stock-based compensation		-		-			16,055
Trenching		-		-			19,318
Transportation		10,223		-			56,061
Assistance and recovery		-		(4,620	)		(29,692	)

Incurred during the year		503,544		(4,154	)		1,423,935

Total exploration costs	$	1,307,140	$	670,491		$	16,634,658

17.	Subsequent events

In February 2012, the Company signed a Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with Jeremy C. Wire to acquire the PC and RH mineral claims, located 0.3 miles west of Emgold’s existing Buckskin Rawhide Property, in Mineral County, Nevada. The PC and RH claims, “Buckskin Rawhide West”, comprise 21 unpatented lode mining claims totalling 420 acres. Pursuant to the lease agreement, advance royalty payments will be payable by the Company to Jeremy C. Wire in the amount of $10,000 per year during years 2012 to 2014, $20,000 in 2015 and $30,000 per year in years 2016 to 2018.

This acquisition expands the Company’s Buckskin Rawhide gold-silver property (the Property”) to 73 unpatented mining claims totaling 1,460 acres. Forty-six of these claims are under a lease and option to purchase agreement with Nevada Sunrise, LLC and the remaining six claims were staked by Emgold. The Property now consists of two non-contiguous claim blocks; Buckskin Rawhide and Buckskin Rawhide West.

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
None		None

Metric units	Multiply by	Imperial units
Hectares	2.471	= acres
Metres	3.281	= feet
Kilometres	0.621	= miles (5,280 feet)
Grams	0.032	= ounces (troy)
Tonnes	1.102	= tons (short) (2,000 lbs)
grams/tonne	0.029	= ounces (troy)/ton

S.E.C. Industry Guide 7	National Instrument 43-101
Reserve: That part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission requires a final or full Feasibility Study to be completed in order to support either Proven or Probable Reserves and does not recognize other classifications of mineralized deposits. Note that for industrial mineral properties, in addition to the Feasibility Study, “sales” contracts or actual sales may be required in order to prove the project’s commerciality and reserve status.	Mineral Reserve: The economically mineable part of a Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a Preliminary Feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified.
Proven Reserves: Reserves for which a quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling of the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well established.	Proven Mineral Reserve: The economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a Preliminary Feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction is justified.
Probable Reserves: Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.	Probable Mineral Reserve: The economically mineable part of an indicated, and in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource, demonstrated by at least a Preliminary Feasibility Study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified.


TABLE OF CONTENTS


GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS		7
PART 1		7
ITEM 1.	IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS	7
ITEM 2.	OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE	7
ITEM 3.	KEY INFORMATION	7
ITEM 4.	INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY	20
ITEM 4A.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	44
ITEM 5.	OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS	44
ITEM 6.	DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES	52
ITEM 7.	MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	66
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	67
ITEM 9.	THE OFFER AND LISTING	68
ITEM 10.	ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	69
ITEM 11.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	80
ITEM 12.	DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES	80
PART II		81
ITEM 13.	DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES	81
ITEM 14.	MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS	81
ITEM 15.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	81
ITEM 16A	AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT	81
ITEM 16b	CODE OF ETHICS	81
ITEM 16c	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	82
ITEM 16d	EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES	82
ITEM 16e	PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS	82
ITEM 16f	CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT	82
ITEM 16g	CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	84
ITEM 16h	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE	84
PART III		85
ITEM 17.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	85
ITEM 18.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	85
ITEM 19.	EXHIBITS	85
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		85
GLOSSARY OF GEOLOGIC AND MINING TERMS		86
SIGNATURES		91

		December 31,
Selected Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Data	2012	2011	2010
Total assets	$1,677,936	$ 2,198,166	$ 2,207,283
Total liabilities	1,125,067	1,543,237	661,707
Contributed surplus	7,035,197	6,800,722	6,629,389
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	--	--	--
Share capital	43,390,203	42,817,739	41,490,268
Equity component of convertible preference shares	--	--	--
Warrants	686,349	1,219,617	1,271,008
Deficit	(50,558,880)	(50,183,149)	(47,845,089)
Equipment and mineral property interests	$1,474,581	$ 1,053,339	$ 1,120,075
Shareholders’ equity (deficiency)	552,869	654,929	1,545,576
Number of outstanding common shares	66,651,462	58,714,504	38,552,444

		For The Years Ended December 31,
Selected Consolidated Statement of Income Data	2012	2011	2010
Revenue	$ --	$ --	$ --
Investment and other income	--	--	--
General and administrative expenses and other items	(811,598)	1,030,920	402,596
Exploration expenses	1,187,329	1,307,140	670,491
Ceramext research costs	--	--	--
Write-down of mineral property interests	--	--	--
Loss according to financial statements	(375,731)	(2,338,060)	(1,073,087)
Loss per share – basic and diluted	(0.01)	(0.06)	(0.05)
Amount in conformity with US GAAP: (United States Dollars)
Selected Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Data	December 31,
	2009	2008

Total assets	$ 1,136,369	$ 1,642,605
Total liabilities	1,925,709	626,549
Share capital	38,792,139	39,109,658
Contributed surplus	4,287,301	4,286,347
Warrants	112,355	1,936,339
Accumulated other comprehensive income	(577,454)	(577,454)
Deficit	(44,206,549)	(43,863,334)

Year	Average Price per ounce (US$)	High Price per ounce (US$)	Low Price per ounce (US$)
2000	279.11	312.70	264.10
2001	271.04	293.25	255.95
2002	309.73	349.30	277.75
2003	363.38	416.25	319.90
2004	409.72	454.20	375.00
2005	444.74	536.50	411.10
2006	603.46	725.00	524.75
2007	695.39	841.10	608.40
2008	871.96	1011.25	712.50
2009	972.35	1212.50	810.00
2010	1224.53	1421.00	1058.00
2011 2012	1571.52 1,668.98	1895.00 1,791.75	1319.00 1,540.00

Classification	True Thickness (ft)	Tonnage (ton)	Gold Grade (oz/ton)	Gold Grade w/ MCF (oz/ton)
Idaho-Maryland Resources²
Measured Mineral Resource ¹	13.3	271,000	0.22	0.31
Measured Mineral Resource ²	70.7	831,000	0.15	0.15
Indicated Mineral Resource	8.1	489,000	0.35	0.50
Measured + Indicated Mineral Resources	41.1	1,666,000	0.22	0.28

Year		Advance Royalty Payment
2012	$	10,000 ⁽¹⁾
2013	$	10,000 ⁽²⁾
2014	$	10,000 ⁽²⁾
2015	$	20,000 ⁽³⁾
2016	$	30,000 ⁽³⁾
2017	$	30,000 ⁽³⁾
2018	$	30,000 ⁽³⁾

Year	Mineral Property Interests (Cumulative)	Equipment (Cumulative)
	$	$
2012	1,464,274	10,307
2011	1,035,163	18,176
2010	1,087,420	32,655

Year	Idaho-Maryland	Stewart	Rozan	Jazz	Buckskin	Total
	$	$	$	$	$	$
2012	580,084	289,151	318,094			1,187,329
2011	775,500	503,544			28,096	1,307,140
2010	670,657	(4,154)	(1,197)		5,185	670,491

	January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013	1-2 years	2-3 years	3-4 years	4-5 years	5 ^th and subsequent years	Total (to 5 years)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, including related parties	1,094,656	$ --	$ --	$ --	$ --	$ --	1,094,656
Warrant liability	--	30,411					30,411
Idaho-Maryland property lease (1)	120,000	--	--	--	--	--	120,000
Mineral property option payments (1)	40,000	60,000	60,000	60,000	60,000	60,000	340,000

	$ 1,254,656	$ 60,000	$ 60,000	$ 60,000	$ 60,000	$ 60,000	1,585,067

Name and Position	Other Principal Directorships	Shares Beneficially Owned as at April 29, 2012	% Of Issued And Outstanding	Principal Business Activities Outside the Company

Sargent H. Berner – Director, Non-Executive Chairman of the Board since May 2010 (Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman of the Board to May 2010)	Aurizon Mines Ltd., Cream Minerals Ltd., ValGold Resources Ltd., Sultan Minerals Ltd., Enterprise Energy Resources Ltd., Olivut Resources Ltd., Palo Duro Energy Inc., Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd., Thor Explorations Ltd.	43,967	.0748%	Businessman; President, Kent Avenue Consulting Ltd.

Kenneth Yurichuk, Director (Chief Financial Officer to August 2012 and Co-Chairman of the Board to February 2009)	ValGold Resources Ltd., Paragon Minerals Corporation, Matrix Management Fund	5,000	.0085%	Partner, Bobot & Yurichuk, Chartered Accountants

Steven J. Wilkinson, Director	ValGold Resources Ltd., Faircourt Resource Fund Limited Partnership	200,000	.3401%	Chief Executive Officer, ValGold Resources Ltd..

William J. Witte - Director (Chief Executive Officer to July 25 2007)	None	57,504	.0978%	Businessman and Mining Consultant

Name and principal position held during fiscal 2009	Year	Salary ⁽¹⁾ ($)	Share-based awards ($)	Option-based awards ($)	Non-equity incentive plan compensation ⁽³⁾ ($)		Pension value ($)	All other compensation ⁽²⁾ ($)	Total compensation ⁽³⁾ ($)
Name and principal position held during fiscal 2009	Year	Salary ⁽¹⁾ ($)	Share-based awards ($)	Option-based awards ($)	Annual incentive plans	Long-term incentive plans	Pension value ($)	All other compensation ⁽²⁾ ($)	Total compensation ⁽³⁾ ($)
Kenneth R. Yurichuk ⁽⁴⁾	2012 2011 2010	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	24,400 42,634 47,988	35,226 42,634 96,200 ⁽⁴⁾
David G. Watkinson ⁽⁵⁾ President & CEO	2012 2011 2010	185,000 185,000 185,000	NIL NIL NIL	40,598 NIL 127,630	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	225,598 185,000 312,630
Grant T. Smith ⁽⁶⁾ CFO	2012 2011 2010	12,095 NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	NIL NIL NIL	12,095 NIL NIL

	Option-based Awards				Share-based Awards ⁽²⁾
Name	Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#)	Option exercise price ($)	Option expiration date	Value of unexercised in-the-money options ⁽¹⁾ ($)	Number of shares or units of shares that have not vested (#)	Market or payout value of share-based awards that have not vested ($)
Kenneth R. Yurichuk	200,000	0.15	07-May-2017	NIL	N/A	N/A
	93,333	0.25	17-Mar-2015	NIL
	100,000	0.25	8-Dec-2015	NIL
David G. Watkinson	750,000	0.15	07-May-2017	NIL	N/A	N/A
	50,000	0.175	12-May-2013	NIL
	93.333	0.25	17-Mar-2015	NIL
	600,000	0.25	8-Dec-2015	NIL
Grant T. Smith	NIL	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Name	Option-based awards – Value vested during the year ($)	Share-based awards – Value vested during the year ⁽¹⁾ ($)	Non-equity incentive plan compensation – Value earned during the year ⁽¹⁾ ($)
Kenneth R. Yurichuk	10,826	NIL	N/A
David G. Watkinson	40,598	NIL	N/A
Grant T. Smith	NIL	NIL	N/A

Name	Fees earned (Cdn$)	Share-based awards ($)	Option-based awards ($)	Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($)	Pension value ($)	All other compensation ($)	otal (Cdn$)
Sargent H. Berner	NIL	NIL	10,826	NIL	NIL	NIL	10,826
William J. Witte	NIL	NIL	10,826	NIL	NIL	NIL	10,826
Andrew MacRitchie	NIL	NIL	8,102	NIL	NIL	NIL	8,102
Stephen J. Wilkinson	NIL	NIL	10,826	NIL	NIL	NIL	10,826

	Option-based Awards				Share-based Awards
Name	Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#)	Option exercise price ($)	Option expiration date	Value of unexercised in-the-money options ⁽¹⁾ ($)	Number of shares or units of shares that have not vested ⁽²⁾ (#)	Market or payout value of share-based awards that have not vested ⁽²⁾ ($)
Sargent H. Berner	200,000	0.15	07-May-2017	NIL	NIL	NIL
	18,000	0.175	19-Nov-2013	NIL
	15,000	0.175	12-July-2014	NIL
	93,333	0.25	17-Mar-2015	NIL
	100,000	0.25	8-Dec-2015	NIL
William J. Witte	200,000	0.15	07-May-2017	NIL	N/A	N/A
	60,000	0.175	19-Nov-2013	NIL
	20,000	0.175	12-July-2014	NIL
	93,333	0.25	17-Mar-2015	NIL
	100,000	0.25	8-Dec-2015	NIL
Andrew MacRitchie	200,000	0.15	22-May-2017	NIL	N/A	N/A
Stephen J. Wilkinson	200,000	0.15	07-May-2017	NIL	N/A	N/A
	5,000	0.175	19-Nov-2013	NIL
	1,000	0.175	12-July-2014	NIL
	93,333	0.25	17-Mar-2015	NIL
	100,000	0.25	8-Dec-2015	NIL

Name	Option-based awards – Value vested during the year ⁽¹⁾ ($)	Share-based awards – Value vested during the year ⁽²⁾ ($)	Non-equity incentive plan compensation – Value earned during the year ⁽²⁾ ($)
Sargent H. Berner	10,826	NIL	N/A
William J. Witte	10,826	NIL	N/A
Andrew MacRitchie	8,102	NIL	N/A
Stephen J. Wilkinson	10,826	NIL	N/A

	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Plan Category ⁽¹⁾	(a)	(b)	(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders ⁽²⁾	4,969,665	$0.19	1,695,481
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	NIL	NIL	NIL
Total	4,969,665		1,695,481

Name	Position(s) with Company	Term of Office/Period of Service
William J. Witte	Director	Director: June 1999 – Present, Executive Vice President: May 1999 - July 2002, President and CEO: July 2002 – July 2007
Sargent H. Berner	Non-Executive Chairman	Director: May 1991 – Present, Co-CEO: July 2007 – February 2009, Co-Executive Chairman: July 2007 – May 2010, CEO: February 2009 – May 2010. Non-Executive Chairman – May 2010 - Present
Stephen J. Wilkinson	Director Chair, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee	Director: June 2007 – Present
Robin A. W. Elliott	Former Director	Director: June 2006 – September 2009
Kenneth Yurichuk	Director	Director: June 2006 to Present, Co-CEO: July 2007 – February 2009, Co-Executive Chairman: July 2007 – May 2010, Chief Financial Officer: February 2009 – August 2012:
Grant Smith	Chief Financial Officer	Chief Financial Officer: September 2012 - Present
David Watkinson	Director and President and Chief Executive Officer	Director: October 2007 – Present, Vice-President Operations: June 2006 – July 2007, Chief Operating Officer: July 2007 – May 2010, President: October 2007 – Present; Chief Executive Officer: May 2010 - Present
Andrew MacRitchie	Director Chair Audit Committee	Director: May 2012 - Present
Mary Davies	Former Corporate Secretary	Corporate Secretary: December 2009 – August 2012
Lisa Maxwell	Corporate Secretary	Corporate Secretary: September 2012 – Present

Name and Title of Option Holder	Number of Shares Underlying Options	Title of Class	Exercise Price (Cdn$)	Expiry Date
William J. Witte, Director	60,000 20,000 93,333 100,000 200,000	Common	0.175	November 19, 2013
		Common	0.175	July 12, 2014
		Common Common Common	0.25 0.25 0.15	March 17, 2015 December 8, 2015 07 May 20
Subtotal	473,333
Sargent H. Berner Director, and Non-Executive Chairman	18,000 15,000 93,333 100,000 200,000	Common	0.175	November 19, 2013
		Common	0.175	July 12, 2014
		Common Common Common	0.25 0.25 0.15	March 17, 2015 December 8, 2015 07 May 2017
Subtotal	426,333
Kenneth Yurichuk Director	93,333 100,000 200,000	Common Common Common	0.25 0.25 0.15	March 17, 2015 December 8, 2015 07 May 2017
Subtotal	393,333
David Watkinson President and Chief Executive Officer, Director
	50,000 93,333 600,000 750,000	Common Common Common Common	0.175 0.25 0.25 0.15	May 12, 2013 March 17, 2015 December 8, 2015 07 May 2017
Subtotal	1,493,333
Stephen J. Wilkinson, Director	5,000 1,000 93,333 100,000 200,000	Common	0.175	November 19, 2013
		Common	0.175	July 12, 2014
		Common Common Common	0.25 0.25 0.15	March 17, 2015 December 8, 2015 07 May 2017
Subtotal	399,333
Andrew MacRitchie, Director	200,000	Common	0.15	22 May 2017
Subtotal	200,000
TOTAL	3,385,665	Common

Name and Principal Position	Remuneration or fees ⁽¹⁾	Share-based awards ⁽²⁾
CEO and President - management fees	$ 185,000	$ 40,598
A company of which the CFO is a director ⁽³⁾ – management fees	12,095	-
A company of which the CFO is a director ⁽³⁾ – accounting	4,089	-
759924 Ontario Ltd. ⁽⁴⁾ – consulting fees	24,400	10,826
Quorum Management	139,250	-
Directors	-	40,580

TSX Venture Exchange: EMR – Trading in Canadian Dollars (post-consolidation, prior years adjusted to reflect consolidation)
	High	Low
	($)	($)
Annual
2012 (to April 29)	0.12	0.04
2011 2010	0.29 0.42	0.07 0.12
2009	0.80	0.20
2008	2.80	0.20
2007	3.50	1.10

TSX Venture Exchange: EMR – Trading in Canadian Dollars
	High	Low
	($)	($)
Calendar 2013 First Quarter Calendar 2012 First Quarter	0.090 0.120	0.040 0.085
Second Quarter	0.100	0.050
Third Quarter	0.110	0.060
Fourth Quarter	0.075	0.045
Calendar 2011
First Quarter	0.29	0.12
Second Quarter	0.15	0.11
Third Quarter	0.15	0.08
Fourth Quarter	0.19	0.07

Month ended
April 30, 2013 March 31, 2013	0.055 0.07	0.025 0.05
February 28, 2013	0.09	0.04
January 31, 2013	0.055	0.045
December 31, 2012	0.065	0.045
November 30, 2012	0.065	0.05

Rounded (‘000’s)	Canadian currency amount	U.S. currency amount
Canadian dollars
Cash	54,000	8,000
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(513,000)	(582,000)

		Years ended December 31 ,
Services:	2012 (Cdn$)	2011 (Cdn$)	2010 (Cdn$)
Audit Fees	$ 30,000	$ 89,329	$ 71,000
Audit-Related Fee ⁽¹⁾	--	5,775	--
Tax Fees	--	2,485	--
All Other Fees ⁽²⁾	--	28,250	--
Total Fees	$ 30,000	$ 125,839	$ 71,000

Independent Auditor’s Reports			F-1
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at December 31, 2012, 2 011, and 2010			F-1
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2 011 , and 2010			F-1
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2 011, and 2010			F-1
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2 011, and 2010			F-1
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 , and 2010			F-1


Exhibit Number	Description
F-1	Consolidated Financial Statements for Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 including Auditors’ Reports from MNP LLP (2012) and MSCM LLP (2011 and 2010)*
F-2	Management Discussion and Analysis for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.*
1.1	Articles and Memorandum of Emgold Mining Corporation, originally incorporated as 361869 B.C. Ltd. on March 17, 1989.(1)
2.1	2005 Stock Option Plan (10% Rolling) – June 8, 2005, amended December 22, 2011 and approved by the TSX-V on February 2, 2012.*
4.1	Revised Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement, Idaho-Maryland Project, dated May 29, 2002.(2)
4.2	Idaho-Maryland Project Lease Extension (1) dated January 26, 2007.*
4.3	Idaho-Maryland Project Lease Extension (2) dated February 6, 2009.*
4.4	Idaho-Maryland Project Lease Extension (3) dated July 22, 2010.*
8.1	List of subsidiaries.(2)
11.1	Code of Ethics, effective September 1, 2005.*
12.1	Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(A)/15d-14(a) of Chief Executive Officer.*
12.2	Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(A)/15d-14(a) of Chief Financial Officer.*
13.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Chief Executive Officer.*
13.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Chief Financial Officer.*
15.1	Idaho-Maryland Mine Project, Grass Valley, Technical Report, effective date December 8, 2009.*
15.2	Letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP dated May 15, 2012.(3)
15.3	Letter from MSCM LLP dated May 14, 2013.*
	Notes:
	* Filed herewith.
	(1) Previously filed as exhibit to Form 6-K on March 8, 2010 and incorporated by reference.
	(2) Previously filed as exhibit to Form 20-F on July 1, 2005 and incorporated by reference.
	(3) Previously filed as exhibit to Form 20-F on May 11, 2012 and incorporated by reference.
	END OF EXHIBITS

	Brecciated	Rock broken up by geological forces.

	Bulk sample	A very large sample, the kind of sample to take from broken rock, or from gravels and sands when testing placer deposits.

	Chalcopyrite	Copper iron sulphide mineral and an important ore of copper.

	Chip sample	A sample composed of discontinuous chips taken along a rock surface across a given line.

	Crystalline	Means the specimen is made up of one or more groups of crystals.

	Cut-off grade	The minimum grade of mineralization used to establish quantitative and qualitative estimates of total mineralization.

	Diabase	Igneous hypabyssal rocks that are transitional from volcanic to plutonic. The name is applied differently in different parts of the world leading to considerable confusion.

	Diamond drill	A type of rotary drill in which the cutting is done by abrasion using diamonds embedded in a matrix rather than by percussion. The drill cuts a core of rock which is recovered in long cylindrical sections.

	Diamond drill hole	A method of obtaining a cylindrical core of rock by drilling with a diamond impregnated bit.

	Fault	A fracture or fracture zone along which there has been displacement of the sides relative to one another parallel to the fracture. Alternatively, a break in the continuity of a body of rock.

	Feasibility study	Engineering study to determine if a mineral property can be developed at a profit, and which methods should be used to develop it.


Management’s Responsibility		i
Independent Auditors’ Report		ii
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position		1
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss		2
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity		3
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows		5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1) Nature of operations and going concern		6
2) Basis of preparation – Statement of Compliance		6
3) Summary of significant accounting policies		7
4) Critical judgments in applying accounting policies		14
5) Accounting standards issued but not yet effective		16
6) Financial instruments and risk management		18
7) Marketable securities		19
8) Property and equipment		20
9) Exploration and evaluation assets		21
10) Share capital		25
11) Related party transactions		30
12) Segmented disclosure		31
13) Capital disclosures		31
14) Deferred taxes		32
15) Contingent liability		34
16) Subsequent events		34