We are mailing this proxy statement on or about April 24, 2020 to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 14, 2020, which we refer to as the record date. The record date was established by our board. Stockholders as of the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of and to vote their shares at the meeting. Each outstanding share of common stock entitles the holder to cast one vote. As of the close of business on the record date, 20,152,054 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting.

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Co., LLC, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares and the proxy card was sent directly to you by our transfer agent. In that case, you may instruct the proxy holders named in the proxy card how to vote your shares of common stock in one of the following ways:

Proxies submitted over the internet, by telephone or by mail must be received by 11:59 p.m. New York City time, on June 9, 2020. If you vote by telephone or via the internet, it is not necessary to return your proxy card.

If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and a voting instruction form was forwarded to you by that organization. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account. You should instruct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions provided by your broker or nominee. If you wish to vote in person at the annual meeting, you must contact the broker or nominee to obtain a legal proxy from the broker or nominee.

If you are a stockholder of record as of the close of business on the record date and you do not mark any selections but return the signed proxy card, your shares will be voted by the proxies named on the proxy card “FOR” each of the three Nominees, “FOR” the proposal to approve the non-binding advisory resolution regarding executive compensation, “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2020, “FOR” the Charter Amendment Proposal and “FOR” the Bylaw Amendment Proposal. If you are a stockholder of record as of the close of business on the record date and you return the signed proxy card, the proxy holders may vote in their discretion with respect to any other matters that properly come before the meeting. If any Nominee named in this Proxy Statement is unwilling or unable to serve as a director, our Board may nominate another individual for election as a director at the annual meeting, and the persons named as proxy holders will vote “FOR” the election of any substitute nominee.

If you are a stockholder of record as of the close of business on the record date and you wish to name as a proxy someone other than the proxies named on the proxy card, you may do so by crossing out the name of the designated proxies and inserting the name of another person. In that case, it will be necessary to sign the proxy card and deliver it to the person so named and for the person so named to be present at and vote at the meeting with the properly executed and marked proxy card. Proxy cards so marked should not be mailed to us or to American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC.

Not in most circumstances. In the absence of your voting instructions, your broker, bank, trust or other nominee may only vote your shares in its discretion on “routine matters” and your nominee may not vote your shares on proposals that are not “routine.” We believe that the proposal to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP is a routine matter on which nominees can vote on behalf of their clients if clients do not furnish voting instructions. All of the other proposals may be considered non-routine matters so your nominee may not be entitled to vote your shares on these proposals without your instructions. If your shares are held in “street name” by your broker, bank, trust or other nominee, you should follow the directions provided by your broker, bank, trust or other nominee in order to instruct them to how to vote your shares.

A representative of our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC, or another person designated by or at the direction of our Board of Directors, will tabulate the votes and act as inspector of elections.

If you hold stock directly in your name, you can revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the annual meeting by filing a written revocation with the Office of our Corporate Secretary, or delivering to American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC a properly executed proxy bearing a later date. You may also revoke your proxy with a timely and valid later telephone or Internet vote or by attending the meeting and voting in person. If not so revoked, the shares represented by such proxy will be voted as instructed in the proxy.

If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, you must contact such nominee and comply with the nominee’s procedures if you want to revoke or change the instructions that you previously provided to the nominee.

Attendance at the meeting will not by itself automatically revoke a previously granted proxy.

A quorum is the presence in person or by proxy of stockholders holding a majority of shares entitled to vote at the meeting. To constitute a quorum, at least 10,076,028 shares must be present in person or by proxy at the meeting. Generally, action cannot be taken at the meeting unless a quorum is present.

Abstentions and brokers non-votes will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

If you do not submit a proxy or vote in person at the annual meeting, it will be more difficult for us to obtain the necessary quorum to hold the annual meeting. In addition, your failure to submit a proxy or to vote in person will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal regarding the election of each of the Nominees to serve as director, “AGAINST” the Charter Amendment Proposal, and “AGAINST” the Bylaw Amendment Proposal.

Yes. Each of the proposals to be submitted to the stockholders stands on its own. Accordingly, you may vote against the Charter Amendment Proposals (or any one or more of the related sub-proposals) or the Bylaw Amendment Proposals (or any one or more of the related sub-proposals). If one or more but fewer than all of Proposals 4.A, 4.B and 4.C are approved, our amended and restated charter will be revised to reflect only those proposals that have been approved, and if one but fewer than all of Proposals 5.A and 5.B are approved, the Bylaws will be revised to reflect only those proposals that have been approved.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares is required for the election of each Nominee, and the approval of Proposals 4.A and 4.B and the Bylaw Amendment Proposal. Accordingly, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of the vote against the election of such nominees and the approval of such proposals.

The affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding shares is required for the approval of Proposal 4.C. Accordingly, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote against the adoption of this proposal.

The affirmative vote of a majority of all of the votes cast on the proposal is required for approval of the proposals relating to the non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP. For purposes of the non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the results of the vote. For the purposes of the vote on the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, abstentions will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote. Brokers, banks and other nominees are not prohibited from voting shares held in street name in their discretion on this proposal, and we do not expect to receive any broker non-votes on this proposal.

Our board of directors is soliciting proxies for the meeting and we will pay the entire cost of the solicitation, including preparing and mailing this proxy statement. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail and through our and our affiliates’ directors, officers and employees, we will request banks, brokers, custodians, nominees and other record holders to forward copies of the proxy statement and other soliciting materials to persons for whom they hold shares and to request authority for the exercise of proxies. We will reimburse such record holders for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in forwarding proxies and proxy materials to stockholders. We have retained DF King for a fee of $6,000 plus expenses and other customary charges, to aid in the solicitation of proxies from our stockholders. To the extent necessary to ensure sufficient representation at the meeting, we or our proxy solicitor may solicit the return of proxies by personal interview, mail, telephone, facsimile, internet or other means of electronic transmission. The extent to which this will be necessary depends upon how promptly proxies are returned. We urge you to send in your proxy without delay.

Stockholders who share the same address and last name may receive only one copy of the proxy materials unless we, in the case of stockholders of record, or such stockholder’s broker, bank or nominee, in the case of stockholders whose shares are held in street name, receive contrary instructions. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce printing and mailing costs. Stockholders desiring to discontinue householding and receive a separate copy of the proxy materials, may (1) if their shares are held in street name, notify their broker, bank or nominee or (2) if they are stockholders of record, direct a written request to: One Liberty Properties, Inc., 60 Cutter Mill Road, Suite 303, Great Neck, NY 11021, Attn: Office of the Corporate Secretary.

If a stockholder wants a proposal to be included in our proxy statement for the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, the proposal, in writing and addressed to the Office of the Corporate Secretary, must be received by us no later than December 26, 2020. Upon timely receipt of any such proposal, we will determine whether or not to include such proposal in the proxy statement in accordance with applicable regulations governing the solicitation of proxies.

For any proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement, but is instead intended to be presented directly at the 2021 annual meeting, rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the “SEC”, permit us to exercise discretionary voting authority to the extent conferred by proxy if we:

Notices of intention to present proposals at our 2021 annual meeting should be submitted in writing and addressed to the Office of the Corporate Secretary.

Stockholders can call (516) 466-3100 or write to us at 60 Cutter Mill Road, Suite 303, Great Neck, NY 11021, Attention: Office of the Corporate Secretary, to request a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. This and other important information about us is also available on our web site which is located at www.1liberty.com. Our Annual Report to Stockholders for 2019 accompanies this proxy statement.

Our business, property and affairs are managed by or under the direction of our board of directors. Members of the board are kept informed of our business through discussions with our chief executive officer, chairman of the board and other officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings of the board and its committees.

During 2019, the board held four meetings. All of the directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the board and the committees of which such director was a member. Our non-management directors (i.e., directors who are not compensated by us or our affiliates except for compensation for serving on the board or its committees) meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. We encourage our directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders and last year, 70% of our directors attended this meeting.

The board of directors designated J. Robert Lovejoy as its “Independent Lead Director.” Among other things, the Independent Lead Director presides over, and proposes the topics to be discussed at, executive sessions of the independent directors, recommends to the chairman of the board matters to be considered and materials to be reviewed by the board, participates in meetings of the committees of the board, serves as an independent point of contact for stockholders desiring to communicate with the board and performs such other duties and responsibilities as are assigned to him by a majority of the non-management directors.

Our company is led by Matthew J. Gould, chairman of our board, Fredric H. Gould, vice chairman of our board and Patrick J. Callan, Jr., president and chief executive officer. Although the board has not established a policy on whether the roles of the chairman and chief executive officer should be separated, the board believes our current structure is the most appropriate structure at this time because it makes the best use of the abilities of these individuals.

Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks we face. Our board of directors has overall responsibility for overseeing risk management with a focus on the more significant risks facing us. Our audit committee oversees risk policies and processes related to our financial statements, financial reporting processes and liquidity risks; our compensation committee oversees risks relating to remuneration of our full-time executive officers; and our nominating and corporate governance committee, which we refer to as the “nominating committee”, oversees corporate governance risks. A portion of each quarterly meeting of the audit committee is devoted to reviewing with management, among other things, property portfolio issues which could have a material adverse impact on current or future operations or financial condition including, potential or actual impairments, if any, liquidity risks, debt covenants and maturities, lease expirations and, as required, reviewing risks arising from related party transactions. Each audit committee meeting is generally attended by our chairman of the board, chief executive officer and chief operating officer who are there, among other things, to respond to issues relating to tenant matters or property operations. In addition, at each meeting of the audit committee, our chief financial officer, our chief accounting officer, the accounting firm performing the internal audit function on our behalf and our independent registered public accounting firm report to the committee with respect to compliance with our internal control policies to ascertain that no failures of a significant or material nature have occurred. This process assists the audit committee in overseeing the risks related to our financial statements and the financial reporting process.

At each meeting of the board of directors, the significant risk issues reviewed by the audit committee at its most recent meeting are discussed by the Board.

Our compensation committee monitors risks associated with our compensation structure. The compensation committee believes that the compensation programs which are in place do not give rise to any risk that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that is designed to help our directors, officers, employees, agents and consultants resolve ethical issues. This code applies to all directors, officers, employees, agents and consultants, including our chief executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting

officer or persons performing similar functions. The code covers a variety of topics, including those required by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, which we refer to as the “NYSE.” Topics covered include conflicts of interest, confidentiality of information, and compliance with laws and regulations.

During 2019, there were no amendments to the code and no waivers of the provisions of the code with respect to any of our directors, officers, employees, agents or consultants. We will post any amendments to, or waivers of, our code on our website. See “Additional Information and Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” to obtain access to, or copies of, our code of business conduct and ethics.

We have three standing committees: audit, compensation and nominating. Our board has adopted corporate governance guidelines that address the make-up and function of the board and a charter for each of these committees. The charter for each committee requires that such committee be comprised of at least three independent directors and in the case of the audit committee, also requires that at least one member of the committee qualify as a “financial expert.” All of the members of each committee were independent during their period of service on such committee and in the case of the audit committee, each such member was also financially literate. See “Additional Information and Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” to obtain access to, or copies of, our corporate governance guidelines and committee charters.

The table below provides membership and meeting information for each of the standing board committees for 2019:

This committee is responsible for assisting the board in overseeing, among other things, (i) the integrity of our financial statements, (ii) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (iii) the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, (iv) the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm, (v) the performance of the accounting firm performing our internal control audit function, and (vi) the preparation of the audit committee report required by the SEC for inclusion in this proxy statement. The audit committee is also responsible for the selection and engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm, for approving the fees paid to such firm and for approving related party transactions.

This committee recommends the base salary and annual bonus to our full-time senior executive officers and the fees to be paid to our directors, determines (or delegates, in the manner and to the extent permitted by applicable law, the determination of) all awards under our equity based incentive plans, oversees compliance with our stock ownership guidelines, and monitors risks associated with our compensation structure.

This committee is responsible for, among other things, recommending a slate of directors for election to the board of directors at the annual stockholders’ meeting, recommending committee assignments to the board of directors, identifying and recommending candidates to fill vacancies on the board of directors between annual stockholder meetings, recommending a slate of officers for election by the board of directors at the annual directors’ meeting, proposing, monitoring and recommending changes to our corporate governance guidelines and overseeing the evaluation of the effectiveness of our board of directors and the committees thereof.

The board believes that it should be comprised of directors with complementary backgrounds and that directors should, at a minimum, have experience which is relevant to our business or otherwise be of assistance to the board in its deliberations. Our nominating committee has not adopted a formal diversity policy in connection with the consideration of director nominations or the selection of nominees. It considers the personal and professional attributes and the experience of each director candidate to promote diversity of expertise and experience among our directors. Additionally, directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics in order to perform their duties properly and should be willing and able to devote the required amount of time to our business.

When considering candidates for director, the nominating committee will take into account a number of factors, including the following:

The nominating committee will consider candidates for director suggested by stockholders applying the criteria for candidates described above and considering the additional information referred to below. Stockholders wishing to suggest a candidate for director should write to our Office of the Corporate Secretary and include:

When seeking candidates for director, the nominating committee may solicit suggestions from management, incumbent directors and others. The nominating committee or its chair will interview a candidate if it believes the candidate might be suitable to be a director. The nominating committee may also ask the candidate to meet with management.

The nominating committee generally intends to recommend that the board nominate incumbent directors whom the committee believes will continue to make important contributions to us, inasmuch as the committee believes that the continuing service of qualified incumbents promotes stability and continuity, giving us the benefit of the familiarity and insight into our affairs that such directors have accumulated during their tenure, while contributing to the board’s ability to work as a collective body.

The board affirmatively determined that for the purposes of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE and, as applicable, the SEC, each of (i) Charles Biederman, Joseph A. DeLuca, J. Robert Lovejoy, Leor Siri, Karen A. Till and Eugene I. Zuriff, constituting 60% of our directors and (ii) the members of our audit, compensation and nominating committees, is independent. The board based these determinations primarily on a review of the responses of our directors to questions regarding employment and compensation history, affiliations and family and other relationships, discussions with directors and relevant facts and circumstances provided to management of any relationships bearing on the independence of a director. In evaluating the independence of Messrs. Biederman and Lovejoy, the board was aware that these directors are limited partners in an investment vehicle managed by an affiliate of Gould Investors L.P. Gould Investors is a stockholder and an affiliate of ours and is primarily engaged in the ownership and operation of real estate properties held for investment. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” for further information about Gould Investors.

None of the compensation committee members were ever officers or employees of ours or has had any relationship requiring disclosure by us under any paragraph of Item 404 (Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons) of Regulation S-K.

Stockholders, employees and other interested persons who want to communicate with the board, any committee of the board, or any individual director can write to:

The Office of the Corporate Secretary will:

At each board meeting, the Secretary will present a summary of all communications received since the last meeting that were not forwarded and make those communications available to the directors on request.

In the event that a stockholder, employee or other interested person would like to communicate with our non-management directors confidentially, they may do so by sending a letter to “Independent Lead Director” at the address set forth above. Please note that the envelope must contain a clear notation that it is confidential.

The table below shows the number of outstanding shares of our unvested restricted stock and the value thereof held by each non-management director at December 31, 2019:

Pursuant to our by-laws, as amended, the number of our directors is determined by our board of directors. Our board currently consists of ten directors. The board is divided into three classes and the classes are elected on a staggered basis. Each class is elected to serve a three year term and is to be as equal in size as is possible. The terms of Charles L. Biederman, Patrick J. Callan, Jr. and Karen A. Till expire at the 2020 annual meeting and when their respective successors are elected and qualify. Our board, upon the recommendation of the nominating committee, nominated each of Ms. Till and Messrs. Biederman and Callan for election at the annual meeting, to serve until our 2023 annual meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies. Seven other individuals serve as directors but are not standing for election because their terms extend past the date of the annual meeting. Proxies will not be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named in the proxy statement.

It is contemplated that all the Nominees will stand for election. Should any Nominee become unavailable for election, all proxies (except proxies marked to the contrary) will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee recommended by the board of directors.

If any director is unable to serve his or her full term, the board, by majority vote of the directors then in office, may elect a substitute.

The following table sets forth information regarding the nominees for director to hold office until the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders:

The following features of our executive compensation program are evidence of our commitment to good corporate governance practice – we encourage you to read the more detailed information set forth herein:

The following charts compare the three and five year cumulative return of our common stock with the Standard and Poor’s 500 index, the FTSE-NAREIT Equity REITs Index and the NAREIT Diversified Index. The three and five year charts assume $100 was invested on December 31, 2016 and 2014, respectively, in our common stock and each of these indices, and assumes the reinvestment of dividends:

We describe below our compensation objectives, policies and decisions as applied to the compensation provided by us in 2019 to the executive officers, whom we refer to as our “named executive officers,” identified in the “Summary Compensation Table”. This discussion focuses on the information contained in the compensation tables appearing herein, but also describes our historic compensation structure to enhance an understanding of our executive compensation disclosure and practice. Our compensation committee oversees our compensation program, recommends the compensation of the named executive officers employed by us on a full-time basis to our board of directors for its approval, recommends the annual fee paid by us to the chairman and vice chairman of our board of directors and makes most determinations with respect to grants of restricted stock and RSUs. Our audit and/or compensation committees, and independent directors, approve the annual fees paid by us to Majestic Property Management Corp. pursuant to a compensation and services agreement, which may result in the payment by Majestic of compensation to our part-time officers, including Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould and David W. Kalish. Majestic Property Management Corp., which we refer to as “Majestic”, is wholly-owned by Fredric H. Gould, the Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors.

We have two categories of officers: (i) officers who devote their full business time to our affairs; and (ii) officers who devote their business time to us on a part-time basis. Our full-time officers and employees are compensated directly and solely by us. Except for Equity Awards and our payment of the chairman’s and vice chairman’s fee, most of our part-time officers and employees are compensated by Majestic which, pursuant to the compensation and services agreement, provides us with the services of executive, administrative, legal, accounting, clerical and property management personnel, as well as property acquisition, sale and lease consulting and brokerage services, consulting services with respect to mortgage financings and construction supervisory services (collectively, the “Services”). In consideration for providing the Services in 2019, we paid Majestic $2,826,000, of which approximately $1,307,000 relates to amounts paid for property management services. Majestic may earn a profit from payments made to it under such agreement. In addition, under this agreement, we made an additional payment to Majestic of $216,000 in 2019 for our share of all direct office expenses, including rent, telephone, computer services, internet usage and supplies. The amount of the annual payments to be made by us to Majestic under the compensation and services agreement is approved each year by our audit and/or compensation committee(s) and our independent directors. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” Our part-time officers also receive compensation from other companies affiliated with us for services unrelated to us.

Most of our full-time and part-time officers and other employees, including employees of affiliated companies who perform services for us on a part-time basis, receive Equity Awards approved by, or pursuant to authority delegated by, the compensation committee.

Our named executive officers are Patrick J. Callan, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer and Lawrence G. Ricketts, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, both of whom devote their full time to our affairs, as well as Matthew J. Gould, chairman of our board, Fredric H. Gould, vice chairman of our board, and David W. Kalish, senior vice president and chief financial officer, each of whom devote time to our affairs on a part-time, as needed, basis.

In reviewing our compensation practices and determinations for 2019, the compensation committee was aware of the results of our June 2017 “say-on-pay” vote in which approximately 79% of the shares that voted on such proposal voted to approve our executive compensation determinations and practices. The committee views such results as supportive of our compensation philosophy, practices and determinations.

The principal objectives of our compensation program for full-time officers are to: (a) ensure that the total compensation paid to such officers is fair and competitive, (b) retain highly experienced officers who have worked together for a long time and contributed to our success, (c) motivate these officers to contribute to the achievement of the Company’s success and (d) align the interests of these executives and our stockholders. The compensation committee believes that relying on these principles will permit us to retain and motivate these officers.

With respect to our part-time executive officers, the compensation committee must be satisfied that such officers provide us with sufficient time and attention to meet our needs and perform their duties on our behalf. The compensation committee believes that (i) using the services of officers with diverse skills on a part-time basis enables us to benefit from a greater degree of executive experience and competence than an organization of our size could otherwise afford and (ii) our part-time executive officers perform valuable services on our behalf, devote sufficient time and attention to our business needs, are able to meet our needs fully and perform their duties effectively.

We determine compensation for our full-time named executive officers on a case-by-case basis and our compensation decisions include subjective determinations. We do not use formal quantitative performance targets to determine compensation, except with respect to RSUs, which are performance-based awards that vest upon satisfaction of market and/or performance-based conditions. Base salaries are determined immediately preceding the year in which such salaries are to be paid, cash bonuses, which are paid pursuant to the Performance-based Cash Bonus Program further described under “ – Components of Executive Compensation – Bonus,” are determined at the end of the year in which services are rendered and paid in the following year, restricted stock is awarded for service in a particular year and granted in the following year, and RSUs are granted annually in June/July of each year as an additional three-year performance incentive.

In determining compensation for 2019, the recommendations of the chairman and/or vice chairman of our board played a significant role in the compensation setting process since these officers are aware of each officer’s duties and responsibilities and were most qualified to assess each officer’s performance. The chairman and /or vice chairman of our board, prior to making recommendations to the compensation committee concerning each full-time officer’s compensation, consulted with other senior executive officers, including our president and chief executive officer. During the process, our overall performance for the applicable year, including total revenues, funds from operations, adjusted funds from operations, net income, dividends, performance of our common stock and acquisition, disposition, financing and portfolio management activities were taken into consideration. The chairman and/or vice chairman of our board and other senior officers also assessed each

individual’s performance in such year, which assessment was highly subjective. During this process, the chairman and/or vice chairman of our board proposed to the compensation committee with respect to each full-time named executive officer, a base salary for 2019, a bonus applicable to 2019 and payable in 2020 and the number of shares of restricted stock and RSUs to be awarded to each full-time named executive officer. The compensation committee then reviewed, evaluated and determined whether to accept, reject or modify the recommendations. The final recommendations by the compensation committee on compensation matters with respect to our full-time named executive officers were then reported to the board of directors, which approved (other than with respect to the grant of equity based awards, which awards are determined solely by the compensation committee or its delegatee), the recommendations of the committee with respect to these officers.

We believe that using part-time officers pursuant to the compensation and services agreement enables us to benefit from access to, and the services of, a group of senior officers with experience and knowledge in real estate ownership (including acquisitions and dispositions), operations, management and finance, legal, accounting and tax matters that an organization our size could not otherwise afford. The base compensation, bonus, if any, and perquisites paid to our part-time officers by Majestic and its affiliates for services on our behalf is determined by Matthew J. Gould and/or Fredric H. Gould, in their capacity as officers of such entities, in consultation with certain of our part-time senior executive officers.

Our part-time executive officers, including our Chairman and Vice Chairman, also receive compensation from other business entities, most of which are owned or controlled by Fredric H. Gould, for services rendered to such entities.

The following table summarizes each element of executive compensation used in 2019 for our named executive officers based on the philosophy and process described in this proxy statement as well as each element’s link to our compensation philosophy.

Base salary and annual bonus are cash-based, while long-term equity awards and long-term equity incentive awards consist of restricted stock awards and RSUs, respectively. In determining compensation, the compensation committee does not have a specific allocation goal between cash and equity-based compensation though the committee generally desires that base salary and cash bonuses (except to the extent based on the attainment of performance criteria), should decrease over time as a percentage of total compensation and long-term equity and other incentive awards should increase as a percentage of total compensation.

In 2019, except for the $289,406 and $115,763 we paid the chairman and vice chairman of our board, respectively, the only form of direct compensation we provided our part-time officers was the granting of long-term equity and equity incentive awards in the form of restricted stock and RSUs. For services rendered to us, our part-time officers are compensated by Majestic, which was paid approximately $2,826,000 (excluding $216,000 as reimbursement for our share of direct office expenses) in 2019 pursuant to the compensation and services agreement. Seven officers are compensated by Majestic for providing services to us on a part-time basis.

Base salary is the basic, fixed form of compensation for the job an officer performs and provides each officer with a guaranteed annual income.

Full-time Officers: Any increase in base salary is determined on a case-by-case basis, is not formula based and is based upon, among other considerations, (i) our performance in the preceding year, (ii) such officer’s current base salary, (iii) amounts paid by other similarly situated REITs for officers performing substantially similar functions, (iv) years of service, (v) job responsibilities, (vi) the individual’s performance (vii) the cost of retaining talented executives in the New York City region, and (viii) the recommendations of the Chairman and/or Vice Chairman of the board and other senior executive officers. Base salary is generally determined the month before the beginning of the calendar year in which such base salary is to take effect.

Part-time Officers: The base salary of our part-time officers is paid by Majestic and its affiliates. The annual fee paid to Majestic is approved by the audit and/or compensation committee(s) and the board of directors; our board and its committees are not involved in determining the base salaries of these officers.

Full-time Officers: We provide the opportunity for our full-time officers to earn an annual cash bonus. We provide this opportunity both to reward our personnel for past performance and to motivate and retain them. We recognize that annual bonuses are almost universally provided by our competitors. In view of the fact that only two of our named executive officers devote their full-time to our affairs, annual cash bonuses for such named executive officers are recommended on a case-by-case basis by our Chairman of the Board and/or Vice Chairman to the compensation committee. Our performance-based cash bonus program, which we refer to as the “Performance-based Bonus Program,” provides that cash bonuses are to be based on funds from operations, tenant occupancy rate, the overall management of our portfolio and discretionary factors. Discretionary factors include total revenues, rental income, net income, dividends paid to stockholders, investor relations activities, and subjective considerations. No specific quantitative targets are established in advance of the applicable year for which a bonus will be paid. Once it has determined the annual bonus to be paid to each of these executive officers, the compensation committee presents its recommendations to the board of directors for its approval. These bonuses are generally determined at the end of the year for which such bonus is awarded and is generally paid in the beginning of the following year.

Part-time Officers: We do not provide any cash bonuses to our Chairman, Vice Chairman or other part-time named executive officers. The annual bonus, if any, to be paid to such part-time officers is paid by Majestic and its affiliates. The annual fee paid to Majestic is approved by the audit and/or compensation committee(s) and our board of directors; our board and its committees are not involved in determining the bonuses paid to part-time officers.

We provide the opportunity for our full-time and part-time officers to receive long-term equity (i.e., restricted stock) and long-term equity incentive awards (i.e., RSUs). These compensation programs are designed to recognize responsibilities, reward performance, motivate future performance, align the interests of our officers with those of our stockholders and retain our officers. The compensation committee makes determinations with respect to the grant of equity awards for all our officers and employees except to the extent that it, in accordance with applicable law, delegates to one or more senior executives the authority to grant such awards to certain individuals (other than executive officers); in such case, the committee sets limits (and may impose such other limits as it deems appropriate) on the total number of such awards that may be granted pursuant to such delegated authority. In determining the long-term equity and long-term equity incentive compensation components, the compensation committee considers all factors it deems to be relevant, including the performance of our named executive officers. Existing stock ownership levels are not a factor in award determinations. As of December 31, 2019, all outstanding equity awards that had been granted were granted under our stockholder approved 2012 Incentive Plan, 2016 Incentive Plan or 2019 Incentive Plan. For purposes of this proxy statement, the RSUs granted in 2019, among other things, to incentivize future performance, are deemed to have been granted for 2019 performance.

In 2019, the compensation committee adopted, as it had in 2018 and 2017, an equity based long-term pay-for-performance incentive program (the “2019 Performance Plan”) pursuant to which we issued to 16 individuals, including our named executive officers, RSUs exchangeable for up to an aggregate of 77,776 shares of common stock (of which 2,750 were subsequently forfeited). As described in further detail in the table below and “- Grant of Plan Based Awards During 2019,” these RSUs vest if and to the extent pre-established market (i.e., average annual total stockholder return) or performance (i.e., average annual return on capital) conditions are met through the June 30, 2022 vesting date. We use RSUs as an element of our long-term equity compensation program with the expectation that in light of the three-year vesting period and the need to satisfy market and/or financial performance conditions, these awards will further align the interests of our executive officers with our stockholders and reward long-term market and financial performance.

The conditions that must be satisfied to earn the performance-based compensation are tied to the achievement of rigorous, sustained performance and/or market goals – as further described below, 50% of the award is based on return on capital (“ROC”) and 50% on total stockholder return (“TSR”). The specific goals and the other material terms and conditions of the 2019 Performance Plan are as follows:

As reflected in the graphic below, the RSUs granted during the three years ended December 31, 2019 are, as of such date, at the 32.2% level of the full payout of the performance objectives at which the RSUs vest (the extent to which the objectives for these awards are deemed to have been satisfied is determined in the manner described in note 11 of our consolidated financial statements included in our 2019 Annual Report to Stockholders):

See “– Long-term Equity and Long-term Equity Incentive Awards” and “– Grant of Plan Based Awards During 2019” for a more extensive description of the metrics applicable to the 2019 Performance Plan.

We do not have a formal policy with respect to whether equity compensation should be paid in the form of stock options, restricted stock or RSUs. We generally grant restricted stock awards which vest after five years of service and in 2019, as we had in 2018 and 2017, granted RSUs that vest after three years of service if, and to the extent, specified performance and/or market conditions are met. The compensation committee generally believes that restricted stock awards and RSUs are more effective than options in achieving our compensation objectives. Restricted stock has a greater retention value than options because of its five-year cliff vesting requirement and because before vesting, cash dividends are paid on all outstanding restricted stock as an additional element of compensation. RSUs provide an additional incentive component to equity based awards in that the units only vest if, and to the extent, performance or market conditions are satisfied. Restricted stock and RSUs align the interests of our officers with our stockholders and because fewer shares are normally awarded than in connection with the grant of options, they are potentially less dilutive.

Our grants of restricted stock are made in January of each year in recognition of services provided for the prior year and the RSUs are granted in June or July of each year. We do not have a formal policy on timing these grants in connection with the release of material non-public information and in view of the three-year and five-year cliff vesting requirements with respect to RSUs and restricted stock awards, respectively, we do not believe such a formal policy is necessary.

Our compensation committee has reviewed our compensation policies and practices to ascertain if the risks arising from such policies or practices are reasonably likely to have a materially adverse effect on us. The compensation committee concluded that while our compensation program takes into account our performance, the program does not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking and our policies and practices achieve an appropriate balance between risk and reward.

Full-time Officers: We provide our full-time officers with a competitive benefits and perquisites program. We recognize that similar benefits and perquisites may be provided at other companies with which we might compete for talent. We review our benefits and perquisites program periodically to ensure it remains fair to our officers and employees.

Part-time Officers: The perquisites afforded to these officers are provided by Majestic and its affiliates; our board and its committees are not involved in determining the perquisites paid to such officers.

None of our named executive officers have employment or severance agreements with us. They are “at will” employees who serve at the pleasure of our board of directors. We do not provide for any post-employment benefits to our named executive officers other than the accelerated vesting of our restricted stock awards and RSUs as a result of death, disability, retirement or a change of control, as described below.

Generally, in the event of death, disability (i.e., the inability to engage in gainful activity due to a life threatening or long lasting mental or physical impairment) or retirement (i.e., having reached the age of 65 and worked for us for at least ten consecutive years), such person’s restricted stock vests fully and a pro-rata portion (based on, among other things, the amount of time between the grant and the triggering event) of their RSUs will vest if and to the extent the applicable performance or market conditions are met as of the completion of the applicable three year performance cycle. In addition, upon a change of control, the (i) shares of restricted stock vest fully and (ii) the RSU’s vest fully if such change occurs 18 months after the beginning of the applicable performance cycle ( the “Cycle Mid-Point”) and, if such change occurs on or prior to the Cycle Mid-Point, a pro-rata portion (based on, among other things, the amount of time between the grant and such triggering event) of such RSUs vests, in each case without regard to satisfaction of market or performance conditions.

Subject to the specific terms and conditions of the applicable plan and award agreement, a change of control is generally deemed to occur if (i) any person, with specified exceptions, becomes the “beneficial owner” of securities representing 25% or more of the combined voting power of our then outstanding securities, (ii) a business combination or sale of all or substantially all of our assets is completed or (iii) there is a change in the composition of a majority of our board of directors, other than changes approved by incumbent directors.

In 2019, we paid our chairman and vice chairman, $289,406 and $115,763, respectively, and in 2020 we intend to pay our chairman and vice chairman $298,088 and $119,235, respectively, for serving in such capacities. These officers did not receive any additional direct compensation from us in 2019 other than equity based awards (i.e., restricted stock and RSUs). Any additional compensation received by them for services rendered to us is paid to them by Majestic. For additional information regarding compensation of these officers, see “Executive Compensation-Summary Compensation Table” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

Prior to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which we refer to as the TCJA, compensation that satisfied conditions set forth under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code to qualify as “performance-based compensation” was not subject to a $1 million limit on deductibility. The TCJA eliminated the

performance-based compensation exception and additionally applies the limit to certain former executive officers. However, it provides a transition rule with respect to remuneration which is provided pursuant to a written binding contract which was in effect on November 2, 2017, and which was not materially modified after that date. With the elimination of the exemption for performance-based compensation, we expect that we will be unable to deduct all compensation in excess of $1 million paid to our CEO, CFO and our other NEOs covered by the TCJA, other than with respect to previously granted awards that comply with the transition rules. Notwithstanding the repeal of the exemption for “performance-based compensation,” the compensation committee intends to maintain its commitment to structuring our executive compensation programs in a manner designed to align pay with performance.

For 2019, a significant portion of the compensation paid to our full-time executives was deductible by us. While the compensation committee generally intends to preserve the deductibility of a significant portion of compensation payments and benefits to the extent reasonably practicable, it has not adopted a formal policy that requires all such compensation to be fully deductible.

In accordance with the compensation setting process described above, the following base salaries, bonuses and equity awards were approved for our full-time named executive officers for 2019 and 2018:

In determining 2019 base salary, the compensation committee determined that the 3.0% and 5.0% increase in base salary for Messrs. Callan and Ricketts, respectively, for 2019 from 2018, was appropriate in recognition of their performance in 2018 and as a general cost of living increase.

In determining cash bonuses for 2019, the compensation committee took into account the factors to be considered pursuant to our Performance-based Cash Bonus Program – the committee considered our funds from operations, and Messrs. Callan’s and Ricketts’ efforts (through the date of the committee meeting and giving effect to transactions contemplated to be completed by year-end), with respect to the properties acquired in 2019 for an aggregate of approximately $49.3 million, the mortgage financings completed in 2019 for gross proceeds of approximately $50.3 million and the overall management of our real estate portfolio. In its consideration of the management of the portfolio, the compensation committee, among other things, took into account management’s oversight of efforts to resolve the challenges presented by our assisted living facility in Round Rock, TX, our attaining a physical occupancy rate (based on square footage) of approximately 98%, the sale of five properties for an aggregate net gain on sale of real estate of $4.3 million, and the negotiation and execution of nine new leases, lease amendments, modifications and extensions with respect to more than 259,000 square feet.

The compensation committee’s efforts to provide that long-term equity and long-term equity incentive compensation represent a significant component of total compensation for the full-time senior executive officers, resulted in determinations of:

We believe that our long-term equity and equity incentive compensation programs, using restricted stock awards with five-year cliff vesting and RSUs that vest after three years, subject to satisfaction of market or performance-based conditions, is a beneficial retention tool and provides an appropriate incentive for our officers. We are mindful of the potential dilution and compensation cost associated with awarding shares of restricted stock and RSUs and therefore we are conservative in granting such awards.

In July 2019, we granted RSUs exchangeable for up to an aggregate of 77,776 shares of common stock, of which 2,750 were subsequently forfeited. These RSUs vest on a cliff basis three years from the grant date if and to the extent applicable performance or market-based conditions are satisfied. These RSUs were issued as both a retention and motivational tool, had a grant date fair value of $923,000 and represent 0.4% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the grant date. For the three years ended December 31, 2019, we awarded an aggregate of 230,276 RSUs, representing an average of 0.4% per annum of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the respective grant dates.

After reviewing the aggregate compensation received by our full-time named executive officers, our performance in 2019, and the performance and responsibilities of each named executive officer, and taking into account the compensation committee’s desire to emphasize equity based awards as a more significant component of total compensation for our full-time named executive officers while at the same time minimizing stockholder dilution, we awarded in 2020, for 2019 performance, 21,750 shares and 17,100 of restricted stock to Messrs. Callan and Ricketts, respectively, representing a 2.4% and 3.0% increase, respectively, from the restricted stock awards they were granted in 2019, for 2018 performance. In addition, we awarded in 2020, for 2019 performance, 10,670 shares of restricted stock to each of David W. Kalish, Fredric H. Gould and Matthew J. Gould, representing a 3.3% increase from the awards they were granted in 2019, for 2018 performance. Assuming a continuing relationship with us, all of the restricted stock awarded in 2020 vests in full in 2025, subject to accelerated vesting upon the occurrence of specified events.

In 2019, we awarded 150,050 shares of restricted stock with an aggregate grant date fair value of $3.9 million—such shares represented 0.77% of our issued and outstanding shares at the grant date. In the five years ended December 31, 2019, we awarded an aggregate of 704,100 shares of restricted stock, representing an average of 0.79% per annum of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the respective grant dates.

We believe the cumulative effect of the restricted stock awards and RSUs is not overly dilutive and has created significant incentives for our officers and employees. We intend to continue to award restricted stock and RSUs as we believe such awards (i) align management’s interests and goals with stockholders’ interests and goals and (ii) are an excellent motivator and employee retention tool.

Generally, the perquisites we provide to our full-time officers represent a small percentage of the compensation paid by us to these officers. We believe that such perquisites are competitive and appropriate.

We are entitled to clawback or obtain reimbursement of an executive’s compensation under the following circumstances:

All shares deemed to be beneficially owned as determined under Rule 13d-3 promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act (including shares as to which beneficial ownership is disclaimed), are counted towards meeting the guidelines. The individuals subject to these guidelines generally have five years from the date they assume such title to achieve the requisite ownership, which will be measured as of December 31 of each year. The stock price used in determining satisfaction of the guidelines is the most favorable price during the two years preceding, and ending, on the December 31 measurement date. As of December 31, 2019, each of our named executive officers and non-employee directors satisfied these guidelines.

In 2019, we paid Majestic $2,826,000 (excluding certain office expenses), of which 16.8% was allocated to our part-time named executive officers. The compensation allocated to these part-time named executive officers is variable/incentive pay and is based on the determinations of Fredric H. Gould, the chairman of Majestic. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

None of the named executive officers hold any stock options and none were granted to any of the named executive officers during the year.

As required by and in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder, we provide below a reasonable estimate of the relationship of the annual total compensation of Mr. Patrick J. Callan, Jr., our Chief Executive Officer and President, to the median annual total compensation of our employees (other than the CEO). For 2019:

In calculating this estimate, we included as our employees as of the December 31, 2019 measurement date, all those individuals to whom we are required by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to issue a W-2. We identified our median employee by calculating our employees’ total annual compensation in the same manner that the CEO’s total annual compensation is calculated for the Summary Compensation Table.

SEC rules allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies and apply various assumptions in presenting this ratio. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio we report.

During 2019 and 2018, $1,973,000 and $1,765,000, respectively, of non-cash compensation expense relating to the restricted stock and RSUs held by our part-time executive officers and employees (who may also be compensated by Majestic or its affiliates), was charged to our operations. See “Executive Compensation-Compensation Program – Background”. The grant date fair value of the shares of restricted stock and RSUs awarded in 2019 and 2018 to persons performing services for us pursuant to the compensation and services agreement is $2,278,000 and $2,326,000, respectively. The grant date fair value of such awards in 2019 and 2018, respectively, to these individuals is as follows: Jeffrey A. Gould, $322,000 and $323,000; Mark H. Lundy, $319,000 and $323,000; Israel Rosenzweig, $163,000 and $175,000; Isaac Kalish, $163,000 and $172,000; and Steven Rosenzweig, $99,000 and $109,000.

Any transaction with affiliated entities raises the potential that we may not receive terms as favorable as those that we would receive if the transactions were entered into with unaffiliated entities or that our officers might otherwise seek benefits for affiliated entities at our expense. Our code of business conduct and ethics contains specific requirements with respect to the approval of these transactions. Generally, a contract or transaction with an affiliated entity must be approved by our audit committee and a majority of our independent directors after consideration of all relevant factors.

The audit committee and the board of directors is seeking ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at our annual meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

We are not required to have our stockholders ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. We are doing so because we believe it is good corporate practice. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection, the audit committee will reconsider whether or not to retain Ernst & Young LLP, but may, in its discretion, decide to retain such independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the audit committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our and our stockholders’ interests.

The audit committee has concluded that the provision of non-audit services listed above is compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP.

The audit committee must pre-approve all audit and non-audit services involving our independent registered public accounting firm.

In addition to the audit work necessary for us to file required reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (i.e., quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports on Form 10-K), our independent registered public accounting firm may perform non-audit services, other than those prohibited by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, provided they are approved in advance by the audit committee. The audit committee approved all audit and non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm in 2019 and 2018.

Annually, the audit committee reviews the audit plan and fees for that year, including the proposed audit fee associated with the audit services in connection with our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The audit committee may, at the time it reviews the proposed audit fees or subsequently thereafter,

approve the provision of tax and other non-audit related services and the maximum expenditure which may be incurred for such services for such year. Any fees for the audit in excess of those approved and any fees for non-audit related services in excess of the maximum established by the audit committee must receive the approval of the audit committee.

Proposals for any other non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm must be approved by the audit committee.

The audit committee of the board of directors is comprised of three independent directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the board of directors. The audit committee reviews the charter on an annual basis. The board of directors, in its business judgment, has determined that each member of the audit committee is independent as required by the NYSE listing standards and the applicable rules of the SEC, during his service on the committee.

Prior to and in conjunction with the filing of the quarterly and annual financial statements, the audit committee meets with the independent registered public accounting firm and the accounting firm performing the internal control audit function, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their review or audit, as applicable, their evaluations of the internal controls, and the overall quality and acceptability of our financial reporting.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the audit committee recommended that the audited financial statements for 2019 be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 for filing with the SEC.

The committee believes that as a result of Ernst & Young’s knowledge of the Company, the quality of Ernst & Young’s performance in 2019, Ernst & Young’s independence from us and management, and Ernst & Young’s extensive experience with REITs, that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to retain the services of Ernst & Young. Accordingly, the audit committee approved the retention of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2020.

We were founded in 1982 as a Maryland corporation. Since then, our charter has been amended over the years in several respects, including to implement restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our stock intended, among other purposes, to assist us to meet the requirements for qualification as a real estate investment trust, or REIT. In this proxy statement, we refer to our charter together with all such amendments as the “Current Charter.”

Recently, we engaged in a comprehensive review of the Current Charter and determined that it contains provisions that are obsolete or ambiguous and requires heightened voting standards for stockholder approval of certain matters. Accordingly, our nominating committee recommended that our board of directors consider revisions to the Current Charter to bring it into line with current Maryland law and REIT industry practice. Our board of directors adopted the recommendations of the nominating committee, declared advisable the amendments (the “Amendments”) to the Current Charter, more fully described below, as reflected in the form of amended and restated charter annexed hereto as Annex A, and directed that such Amendments be submitted to the stockholders for their consideration at the annual meeting.

In general, the board is recommending the approval of the Amendments described below to align our charter with current Maryland law and REIT industry practice.

As more fully described below, the Amendments under Proposals 4.A, 4.B, and 4.C (the “Charter Amendment Proposals”) would:

Attached hereto as Annex A is the form of the amended and restated charter, which shows the changes to our existing charter to be affected by the Charter Amendment Proposals, and which we refer to as the “Amended Charter.” The Amended Charter reflects the provisions of our charter as currently in effect and assumes that all of the Amendments are approved. If the Charter Amendment Proposals are approved, we will file Articles of Amendment and Restatement reflecting the Amended Charter. If one or more but fewer than all of the Charter Amendment Proposals are approved, the Amended Charter, and the Articles of Amendment and Restatement, will be revised to reflect only those Amendments that are the subject of the Charter Amendment Proposals that have been approved. The summaries of the Amendments to our Current Charter under the Charter Amendment Proposals below do not purport to be complete and are subject to and qualified in their entirety by reference to the Amended Charter.

Our Current Charter authorizes us to issue up to 25 million shares of common stock. As of April 14, 2020, 20,152,054 shares of common stock were outstanding and an aggregate of approximately 2.6 million shares of common stock were reserved, which we refer to as the “Reserved Shares”, for issuance pursuant to outstanding RSUs, the 2019 Plan, our dividend reinvestment plan and our “at the market equity program”, leaving only approximately 2.3 million shares available for future issuance. While we have no current plans to issue additional shares of common stock other than the Reserved Shares, our nominating committee and our board believes that the availability of additional shares of common stock for issuance is advisable in order to provide us with the flexibility to engage in future equity financings and acquisitions in order to fund our long-term growth.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock is required for the approval of Charter Amendment Proposal 4.A.

The Current Charter requires us to indemnify our directors, officers and employees to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, and does not address whether we are required to advance the expenses of these individuals in advance of a final determination as to their entitlement to indemnification under the Current Charter. A requirement to advance expenses to directors and officers is commonplace among our competitors and important to our ability to attract and retain executive and director talent. Further, because Maryland law does not impose any limitations on a Maryland corporation’s ability to indemnify non-officer employees, our nominating committee and board of directors believes that providing indemnification to employees only if approved by the board of directors is more appropriate than providing employees with an automatic and unlimited right to indemnity.

Under the Amended Charter, we would be required to indemnify and, without requiring a preliminary determination of the ultimate entitlement to indemnification, pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to:

The Amended Charter would allow us, with the approval of our board of directors, to indemnify our employees, as well as directors and officers of our predecessors, subject to the same limitations set forth in the immediately preceding paragraph.

Under the Maryland General Corporation Law (“MGCL”), the Current Charter and the Amended Charter, we must indemnify a director or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity. The MGCL permits us to indemnify our present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made or threatened to be made a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that:

We may not indemnify a director or officer in a suit (i) by or on our behalf in which the director or officer was adjudged liable to the corporation or (ii) in which the director or officer was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received. A court may order indemnification if it determines that the director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification, even though the director or officer did not meet the prescribed standard of conduct or was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received. However, indemnification for an adverse judgment in a suit by or on behalf of the corporation, or for a judgment of liability on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received, is limited to expenses.

In addition, the MGCL permits us to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon receipt of:

Our nominating committee and board of directors believe that providing for mandatory advance of expenses in circumstances where a director or officer has provided the representations noted above will assist us in attracting and retaining talent on our board of directors. Further, our nominating committee and board of directors believe that requiring approval of the board of directors before providing indemnification or advance of expenses to employees, and limiting indemnification to expenses arising out of an indemnified person’s service to us, is fair and reasonable to us.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock is required for the approval of Charter Amendment Proposal 4.B.

The Current Charter requires that all actions that require approval by our stockholders under Maryland law, including the election of directors, be approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon, except that amendments to the Current Charter that change the terms or contract rights of outstanding shares of our stock require approval by the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares so affected.

Our nominating committee and board of directors believe eliminating the heightened vote requirements stated in the Current Charter for the approval of routine matters under Maryland law, including the election of directors, and amendments to the terms of outstanding stock, is in our best interests and is consistent with the voting requirements of a majority of other REITs.

Under the Amended Charter, approval of routine matters required by the MGCL to be approved by our stockholders would require approval of a majority of the votes cast on the matter, and approval of our dissolution, merger, consolidation, share exchange or conversion, or amendments to our charter that require approval by our stockholders, would require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.

Further, elimination of the requirement that the election of directors be approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares will permit our board of directors to amend our bylaws to provide that, in uncontested elections, our directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast by our stockholders in the election of such director, and to amend our corporate governance guidelines to require that, if an incumbent director fails to receive the required vote for re-election, he or she will offer to resign from our board of directors. If such provisions are adopted, in contested elections, our directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast in the election of directors. If the Amendment to be implemented by Proposal 4.C is approved, we expect that our nominating committee and our board of directors will implement these provisions to take effect at the same time as the Amended Charter. Our stockholders are not being asked to approve any amendments to our bylaws or corporate governance guidelines pursuant to this Proxy Statement, and amendments to our bylaws or corporate governance guidelines are not included in Proposal 4.C.

The affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the proposal is required for the approval of Charter Amendment Proposal 4.C.

At the same time that we engaged in a review of the Current Charter, we also engaged in a review of our bylaws. As a result, our nominating committee recommended, and our board of directors has recommended to our stockholders for approval, amendments repealing certain outdated provisions of our bylaws that are not customary for modern NYSE listed REITs.

As more fully described below, the amendments to our bylaws described under Proposals 5.A and 5.B, (the “Bylaw Amendment Proposals”) would:

If both of the Bylaw Amendment Proposals are approved, we will amend our Bylaws to delete both Section 17 and Section 18 of Article III of our Bylaws. If one but not both of the Bylaw Amendment Proposals are approved, we will amend our Bylaws to delete only the section of our Bylaws that is the subject of the Bylaw Amendment Proposal that was approved.

Section 17 of Article III of our Bylaws generally permits us to invest in any type of real property, mortgage loans or other assets, as long as the investment does not adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT or require us to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and contains certain restrictions on our activities intended to facilitate this compliance. A copy of Section 17 of Article III of our current Bylaws is set forth in Annex B.

Our board of directors has no plans for us to terminate our election to qualify as a REIT, and no plans for us to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. However, the requirements for qualification as a REIT, as well as the requirements for us to be exempt from registration as an investment company, are more complex than the restrictions set forth in Section 17 of our current Bylaws and are subject to change as a result in changes to federal statutes and regulations, as well as new administrative and judicial interpretations. Further, we do not believe that compliance with the restrictions set forth in Section 17 of Article III of our Bylaws, alone, is sufficient for us to ensure that we continue to qualify as a REIT and continue to qualify for an exemption from registration as an investment company. In other words, we believe that Section 17 of Article III of our Bylaws imposes restrictions on us that could increase our legal and compliance costs, without being sufficient to preserve our qualification as a REIT or our exemption from registration as an investment company. Further, restrictions of this type are rare amongst NYSE listed REITs. As a result, our board of directors recommends that our stockholders repeal Section 17 of Article III of our Bylaws. Our board of directors does not intend to make any changes in our business or operations if Bylaw Amendment Proposal 5.A is approved.

The affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast a majority of the votes entitled to be cast thereon is required for approval of Bylaw Amendment Proposal 5.A.

Section 18 of Article III of our Bylaws generally permits our board of directors to delegate responsibility for management of our assets and the administration of our day-to-day business and affairs to a third party management company, subject to approval by a majority of our independent directors and our stockholders, if such approval is required by the Current Charter. A copy of Section 18 of Article III of our current Bylaws is set forth in Annex C.

Although Section 18 of Article III of our Bylaws requires approval of our independent directors and stockholders before we may engage a third-party manager for our business, if and to the extent required by the Current Charter, the Current Charter does not require any such approvals. We are internally managed, although we may, from time to time, engage third-party property managers to manage one or more of our properties, and we obtain the services of certain personnel pursuant to the compensation and services agreement. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” We have no intention to engage a third-party manager of our company. However, as a matter of good corporate governance, our board of directors is recommending that our stockholders repeal Section 18 of Article III of our Bylaws as it is obsolete.

The affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast a majority of the votes entitled to be cast thereon is required for approval of Bylaw Amendment Proposal 5.B.

As of the date of this proxy statement, we do not know of any business that will be presented for consideration at the meeting other than the items referred to in the Notice of the Meeting. Subject to applicable law, if any other matter is properly brought before the meeting for action by stockholders, the holders of the proxies will vote and act with respect to the business in accordance with their best judgment and discretionary authority to do so is conferred by the enclosed proxy.

Our corporate governance guidelines, code of business conduct and ethics and the charter for each of our audit, compensation and nominating committees are available at the corporate governance section of our website at: www.onelibertyproperties.com/corporate_governance. Copies of such documents may be obtained without charge by writing to us at 60 Cutter Mill Road, Suite 303, Great Neck, NY 11021, Attn: Secretary.

This proxy statement (including the notice of meeting), the proxy card and our 2019 annual report to stockholders are available at http://1liberty.com/annualmeetingmaterials.pdf.

The name of the Corporation is:

The purpose for which the Corporation is formed is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Laws of the State of Maryland as now or hereafter in force.

The post-office address of the principal office of the Corporation in the State of Maryland is c/o CSC - Lawyers Incorporating Service Company, 11 East Chase Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The name of the resident agent of the Corporation in the State of Maryland is CSC - Lawyers Incorporating Service Company, a corporation of the State of Maryland, and the post-office address of the resident agent is 11 East Chase Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.

(1)  The total number of shares of capital stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is thirty sevenSixty two million five hundred thousand (37,500,00062,500,000) shares, (a) twenty-fiveFifty million (25,000,00050,000,000) shares of which shall be designated common stock, One Dollar ($1.00) par value per share (the “Common Stock”), and (b) twelve million five hundred thousand (12,500,000) shares of which shall be designated preferred stock, One Dollar ($1.00) par value (the “Preferred Stock,” and together with the Common Stock, the “Shares”).

(2)  Subject to Article X, each share of Common Stock shall entitle the owner thereof to vote at the rate of one (1) vote for each share held.

(3)  Any fractional shares shall carry proportionately all the rights of a whole share, excepting any right to receive a certificate evidencing such fractional share, but including, without limitation, the right to vote and the right to receive dividends.

(4)  All persons who shall acquire stock in the Corporation shall acquire the same subject to the provisions of these Articles of Incorporation and the by-laws of the Corporation.

(5)  Subject to Article X, the Board of Directors is hereby expressly granted authority to authorize from time to time, in accordance with applicable law, the issue of one or more series of Preferred Stock and with respect to any such series, to fix by resolution or resolutions the numbers, powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, including but without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following:

(a)  entitling the holders thereof to cumulative, non-cumulative or partially cumulative dividends, or to no dividends;

(b)  entitling the holders thereof to receive dividends payable on a parity with, junior to, or in preference to, the dividends payable on any other class or series of capital stock of the Corporation;

(c)  entitling the holders thereof to rights upon the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of, or upon any other distribution of the assets of, the Corporation, on a parity with, junior to or in preference to, the rights of any other class or series of capital stock of the Corporation;

(d)  providing for the conversion, at the option of the holder or of the Corporation or both, of the shares of Preferred Stock into shares of any other class or classes of capital stock of the Corporation or of any series of the same or any other class or classes or into property of the Corporation or into the securities or properties of any other corporation or person, including provision for adjustment of the conversion rate in such events as the Board of Directors shall determine, or providing for no conversion;

(e)  providing for the redemption, in whole or in part, of the shares of Preferred Stock at the option of the Corporation or the holder thereof, in cash, bonds or other property, at such price or prices (which amount may vary under different conditions and at different redemption dates), within such period or periods, and under such conditions as the Board of Directors shall so provide, including provisions for the creation of a sinking fund for the redemption thereof, or providing for no redemption;

(f)  lacking voting rights or having limited voting rights or enjoying general, special or multiple voting rights;

(g)  specifying the number of shares constituting that series and the distinctive designation of that series and the stated value of that series;

(h)  specifying the limitations and restrictions, if any, to be effective while any shares of such series are outstanding upon (i) the payment of dividends, (ii) the making of other distributions, (iii) the purchase, (iv) the redemption or (v) an acquisition, by the Corporation of any other class or classes of stock of the Corporation ranking junior to the shares of such series either as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up;

(i) specifying the conditions or restrictions, if any, upon the creation of indebtedness of the Corporation or upon the issuance of any additional stock (including additional shares of such series or of any other series or of any other class) ranking on a parity with or prior to the shares of such series as to dividends or distributions of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up; and

(j)  providing for any other power, preference and relative, participating, optional or other rights or terms, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall not be inconsistent with applicable law, this Section IV(5) or any resolution of the Board of Directors pursuant hereto.

(1)  The number of directors of the Corporation shall be three (3) is currently    , which number may be increased pursuant to the by-laws of the Corporation but shall never be less than three. Commencing with the annual meeting of stockholders held on May 22, 1984, the directors of the Corporation shall be classified with respect to the time for which they shall severally hold office by dividing them into three classes, each class to be as nearly equal in number as possible, which classes shall be designated as Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3. Subject to the provisions hereof, the number of directors in each class shall from time to time be designated by the Board of Directors of the Corporation pursuant to the by-laws. The Class 1 director shall be elected initially for a term of one year; the Class 2 directors shall be elected initially for a term of two years; and the Class 3 directors shall be elected initially for a term of three years. At each annual meeting, the successors to the class of directors whose terms shall expire that year shall be elected to hold office for a term of three years so that each term of office of one class of directors shall expire in each year.

(2)  The Board of Directors of the Corporation is hereby empowered to authorize the issuance from time to time of shares of capital stock, whether now or hereafter authorized, for such consideration as the Board of Directors may deem advisable, subject to such limitations as may be set forth in these Articles of Incorporation or in the by-laws of the Corporation or in the General Laws of the State of Maryland.

(3)  No holder of shares of stock of the Corporation shall, as such holder, have any right to purchase or subscribe for any shares of the capital stock of the Corporation or any other security of the Corporation

which it may issue or sell (whether out of the number of shares authorized by these Articles of Incorporation, or out of any shares of the capital stock of the Corporation acquired by it after the issue thereof, or otherwise) other than such right, if any, as the Board of Directors, in its discretion, may determine.

(4)  Each holder of stock of the Corporation shall upon demand disclose to the Board of Directors in writing such information with respect to direct and indirect ownership of securities of the Corporation as the Board of Directors deems necessary to comply with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as from time to time amended, applicable to the Corporation, or to comply with the requirements of any taxing authority.

(5)  Each, director, officer and employee of the Corporation shall be indemnified by the Corporation to the full extent permitted by the General Laws of the State of Maryland, as now or hereafter in force.

(5)  The Corporation, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law in effect from time to time, shall indemnify and, without requiring a preliminary determination of the ultimate entitlement to indemnification, shall pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to (a) any individual who is a present or former director or officer of the Corporation and who is made or threatened to be made a party to, or witness in, the proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity or (b) any individual who, while a director or officer of the Corporation and at the request of the Corporation, serves or has served as a director, officer, trustee, member, manager or partner of another corporation, real estate investment trust, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise and who is made or threatened to be made a party to, or witness in, the proceeding by reason of his or her service in such capacity, in either case, from and against any claim or liability to which such individual may become subject by reason of his or her service in such capacity. The rights to indemnification and advance of expenses provided by this Charter shall vest immediately upon election of a director or officer. The Corporation may, with the approval of the Board of Directors, provide such indemnification and advancement of expenses to any individual who served a predecessor of the Corporation (including, without limitation, its direct or indirect subsidiaries), in any of the capacities described in (a) or (b) above and to any employee or agent of the Corporation or a predecessor of the Corporation. The indemnification and payment or reimbursement of expenses provided in this Charter shall not be deemed exclusive of or limit in any way other rights to which any person seeking indemnification or payment or reimbursement of expenses may be or may become entitled under any bylaw, resolution, insurance, agreement or otherwise.

Neither the amendment nor repeal of this Section 5, nor the adoption or amendment of any other provision of the Charter or the Bylaws inconsistent with this Section 5, shall apply to or affect in any respect the applicability of the preceding paragraph with respect to any act or failure to act which occurred prior to such amendment, repeal or adoption. For the avoidance of doubt, the rights of indemnification provided by this Charter shall protect acts performed by such indemnitees (including by reason of being named a person who is about to become a director) prior to the date of this Charter, including acts performed, or omissions taking place, prior to the formation of the Corporation.

(6)  The Board of Directors of the Corporation may make, alter or repeal from time to time any of the by-laws of the Corporation except any particular by-law which is specified as not subject to alteration or repeal by the Board of Directors.

(7)  The Board of Directors may authorize, subject to such approval of stockholders and other conditions, if any, as may be required by any applicable statute, rule or regulation, the execution and performance by the Corporation of one or more agreements with any person, corporation, association, company, trust, partnership (limited or general) or other organization whereby, subject to the supervision and control of the Board of Directors, any such other person, corporation, association, company, trust, partnership (limited or general), or other organization shall render or make available to the Corporation managerial, investment advisory and/or related services, office space and other services and facilities (including, if deemed advisable by the Board of Directors, the management or supervision of the investments of the Corporation) upon such terms and conditions as may be provided in such agreement or agreements (including, if deemed fair and equitable by the Board of Directors, the compensation payable thereunder by the Corporation).

(8)  The Board of Directors may authorize any agreement of the character described in paragraph (7) of this Article V or other transaction with any person, corporation, association, company, trust, partnership (limited or general), or other organization, although one or more of the members of the Board of Directors or officers of the Corporation may be the other party to any such agreement or an officer, director, stockholder, or member of such other party, and no such agreement or transaction shall be invalidated or rendered voidable solely by reason of the existence of any such relationship if (i) the existence is disclosed or known to: (a) the Board of Directors, and the Board authorizes, approves, or ratifies the agreement or transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of disinterested directors, even if the disinterested directors constitute less than a quorum; or (b) the stockholders entitled to vote, and the agreement or transaction is authorized, approved, or ratified by a majority of votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote other than the votes of shares owned of record or beneficially by the interested director or such other entity or officer, director, stockholder or member thereof; or (ii) the contract is fair and reasonable to the Corporation. Any member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation who is also a director or officer of such other entity or who is so interested or associated with such other entity may be counted in determining the existence of a quorum at any meeting of the Board of Directors which shall authorize any such agreement or transaction, and may vote thereat to authorize any such agreement or transaction, with like force and effect as if he were not such director or officer of such other entity or not so interested or associated.

(9)  The determination as to any of the following matters made in good faith by or pursuant to the direction of the Board of Directors consistent with the charter of the Corporation and in the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of duties, shall be final and conclusive and shall be binding upon the Corporation and every holder of shares of its capital stock, namely: the amount of the net income of the Corporation for any period and the amount of assets at any time legally available for the payment of dividends; the amount of paid-in surplus, other surplus, annual or other net profit, or net assets in excess of capital, undivided profits, or excess of profits over losses on sales of assets; the amount, purpose, time of creation, increase or decrease, alteration or cancellation of any reserves or charges and the propriety thereof (whether or not any obligation or liability for which such reserves or charges shall have been created shall have been paid or discharged); the fair values, or any sale, bid or asked price to be applied in determining the fair value, of any asset owned or held by the Corporation; and any matter relating to the acquisition, holding and disposition of any assets by the Corporation.

(10)  Notwithstanding any provision of the General Laws of the State of Maryland requiring any action to be taken or authorized by the affirmative vote of the holders of a greater proportion than a majority of the shares or of the shares of each class, or otherwise to be taken or authorized by vote of the stockholders entitled to cast a greater number of votes, such action shall be effective and valid, except as otherwise provided in Article VII hereof, if declared advisable by the Board of Directors and taken or authorizedapproved by the affirmative vote of the holders ofstockholders entitled to cast a majority of all the total number of shares outstanding andvotes entitled to vote thereonbe cast on the matter.

(11)  Only the stockholders may, at any meeting of stockholders duly called and at which a quorum is present, by the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of a majority of all of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, remove any director or directors from office, and only for cause, and may elect a successor or successors to fill any resulting vacancies for the unexpired terms of removed directors.

(12)  To the maximum extent that Maryland law in effect from time to time permits limitation of the liability of directors and officers, no director or officer of the Corporation shall be liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for money damages.

Neither the amendment nor repeal of this Paragraph, nor the adoption or amendment of any provision of the Articles of Incorporation or By-laws inconsistent with this Paragraph, shall apply to or affect in any respect the applicability of the preceding sentence with respect to any act or failure to act which occurred prior to such amendment, repeal or adoption.

If at any time the Board of Directors shall in good faith be of the opinion that direct or indirect ownership of shares of stock of the Corporation has or may become concentrated to an extent which would cause the Corporation to fail to qualify or be disqualified as a real estate investment trust by virtue of Sections 856(a)(5) or

(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or similar provisions of successor statutes, pertaining to the qualification of the Corporation as a real estate investment trust, the Board of Directors shall have the power (i) by lot or other means deemed equitable by them to call for purchase from any stockholder of the Corporation a number of shares sufficient in the opinion of the Board of Directors to maintain or bring the direct or indirect ownership of shares of stock of the Corporation into conformity with the requirements of said Sections 856(a)(5) and (6) pertaining to the Corporation, and (ii) to refuse to transfer or issue shares of the Corporation to any person whose acquisition of such shares would, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, result in the Corporation being unable to conform to the requirements of said Sections 856(a)(5) and (6). The purchase price for any shares of stock purchased pursuant hereto (i) shall be equal to the fair market value of the shares as reflected in the closing sale price for the shares, if then listed on a national securities exchange, or the average of the closing sales prices for the shares if then listed on more than one national securities exchange, (ii) if the shares are not at the time listed or admitted for trading on any such exchange, then such price as shall be equal to the last reported sale price, or if there is no such sale price, the average of the last reported bid and asked prices, as reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (“Nasdaq”), (iii) if the shares are not at the time quoted on the Nasdaq, then such price shall be equal to the last reported bid and asked prices as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board, or any similar reputable quotation and reporting service, if such quotation is not reported by the OTC Bulletin Board, or (iv) if no such closing sales prices or quotations are available, then the purchase price shall be equal to the net asset value of such stock as determined by the Board of Directors in accordance with the provisions of applicable law. Payment of the purchase price shall be made in cash by the Corporation at such time and in such manner as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. From and after the date fixed for purchase by the Board of Directors, the holder of any shares of stock so called for purchase shall cease to be entitled to distributions, voting rights and other benefits with respect to such shares, excepting only the right to payment of the purchase price fixed as aforesaid. Any transfer of shares that would prevent the corporation from continuing to be qualified as a real estate investment trust by virtue of the application of said Sections 856(a)(5) and (6) shall be deemed void ab initio and the intended transferees shall be deemed never to have had an interest therein. If the foregoing provision is determined to be void or invalid by virtue of any legal decision, statute, rule or regulation, then the transferee of such shares shall be deemed, at the option of the Corporation, to have acted as agent on behalf of the Corporation in acquiring such shares and to hold such shares on behalf of the Corporation.

The Corporation reserves the right from time to time to make any amendments to its charter which may be now or hereafter authorized by law, including any amendments changing the terms or contract rights of any of its outstanding stock by classification, re-classification, or otherwise. No such amendment which changes the terms or contract rights of any of its outstanding stock shall be valid unless such amendment shall have been authorized by not less than two-thirds of the aggregate number of votes entitled to be cast thereon by a vote at a meeting or in writing with or without a meeting. Any other amendment to the corporation’s charter shall be valid if such amendment shall have been authorized by not less than a majority of the aggregate number of votes entitled to be cast thereon by a vote at a meeting or in writing with or without a meeting. All rights and powers conferred by the charter of the Corporation on stockholders, directors and officers are granted subject to this reservation.

The Corporation is to have perpetual existence.

The Corporation expressly elects not to be subject to or governed by the provisions of Subtitle 6 of Title 3 of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or any substantially similar successor law.

(1) DEFINITIONS. For the purposes of this Article X, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

“Beneficial Ownership” shall mean ownership of Shares by a Person who (i) would be treated as an owner of such Shares under section 542(a) (2) of the Code either directly or constructively through the application of Section 544 of the Code, as modified by Section 856(h)(1)(B) of the Code or (ii) would be treated as an owner of such Shares under Section 318(a) of the Code, as modified by Section 856(d)(5) of the Code. The terms “Beneficial Owner,” “Beneficially Owns,” “Beneficially Own” and “Beneficially Owned” shall have the correlative meanings.

“Charitable Beneficiary” shall mean an organization or organizations described in Sections 170(b)(1)(A) and 170(c) of the Code and identified by the Board of Directors as the beneficiary or beneficiaries of the Excess Share Trust.

“Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

“Excess Shares” shall mean Shares resulting from an event described in Article X(3).

“Excess Share Trust” shall mean the trust created pursuant to Article X(3) and (14).

“Excess Share Trustee” shall mean a person who shall be unaffiliated with the Corporation, any Purported Beneficial Transferee and any Purported Record Transferee, identified by the Board of Directors as the trustee of the Excess Share Trust.

“Existing Holder” shall mean any Person who Beneficially Owns a total amount or value in excess of 9.9% of our Shares on June 14, 2005.

“Existing Holder Amount” shall mean an amount equal to an amount which would not result (i) in five Persons Beneficially Owning more than 49% of the Shares, (ii) the Shares being beneficially owned (as provided in Section 856(a) of the Code) by less than 100 Persons (determined without reference to any rules of attribution), and (iii) in the Corporation being “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code.

“Existing Holder Limit” shall mean, with respect to each Existing Holder, a total amount or value of Shares such Person may Beneficially Own, which amount shall equal the lesser of (i) an amount determined by the Board of Directors from time to time with respect to such Person and (ii) the Existing Holder Amount.

“Fair Market Value” shall mean the last reported sales price reported on the NYSE for Shares on the trading day immediately preceding the relevant date, or if not then traded on the NYSE, the last reported sales price for Shares on the trading day immediately preceding the relevant date as reported on any exchange or quotation system over or through which such Shares may be traded, or if not then traded over or through any exchange or quotation system, then the market price of such Shares on the relevant date as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors.

“Ownership Limit” shall mean, with respect to (i) an Existing Holder, the Existing Holder Limit, and (ii) with respect to all other Persons, 9.9% or more, in total number of Shares or value, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of Common Stock and Preferred Stock of the Corporation. The number and value of the outstanding Shares of any class or series of Common Stock and Preferred Stock of the Corporation shall be determined by the Board of Directors in good faith, which determination shall be conclusive for all purposes hereof.

“Person” shall mean an individual, corporation, partnership, estate, corporation (including a corporation qualified under Section 401(a) or 501(c)(17) of the Code), portion of a corporation permanently set aside for or to be used exclusively for the purposes described in Section 642(c) of the Code, association, private foundation within the meaning of Section 509(a) of the Code, joint stock company or other entity and also includes a group as that term is used for purposes of Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“Purported Beneficial Transferee” shall mean, with respect to any purported Transfer which results in Excess Shares, as defined below in Article X(3), the Person who would have been the beneficial holder of the Shares, if such Transfer had been valid under Article X(2).

“Purported Record Transferee” shall mean, with respect to any purported Transfer which results in Excess Shares, as defined below in Article X(3), the Person who would have been the record holder of the Shares, if such Transfer had been valid under Article X(2).

“REIT” shall mean a real estate investment trust under Section 856 of the Code.

“REIT Provisions of the Code” means Sections 856 through 860 of the Code and any successor or other provisions of the Code relating to real estate investment trusts (including provisions as to the attribution of ownership of beneficial interests therein) and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

“Restriction Termination Date” shall mean the first day on which the Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in the best interests of the Corporation to attempt to, or continue to, qualify as a REIT.

“Shares” shall mean the shares of the Corporation as may be authorized and issued from time to time pursuant to Article IV.

“Transfer” shall mean any sale, transfer, gift, assignment, devise or other disposition of Shares (including (a) the granting of any option or entering into any agreement for the sale, transfer or other disposition of Shares, (b) the sale, transfer, assignment or other disposition of any securities or rights convertible into or exchangeable for Shares and (c) any transfer or other disposition of any interest in Shares as a result of a change in the marital status of the holder thereof), whether voluntary or involuntary, whether of record, constructively or beneficially and whether by operation of law or otherwise. The terms “Transfers” and “Transferred” shall have the correlative meanings.

(2)  OWNERSHIP LIMITATION.

(A)  Except as provided in Article X(11) and (19), and subject to clause (B) below, until the Restriction Termination Date:

(i)  no Person shall Beneficially Own Shares in excess of the Ownership Limit with respect to such Person;

(ii)  any Transfer that, if effective, would result in any Person Beneficially Owning Shares in excess of the Ownership Limit with respect to such Person shall be void ab initio as to the Transfer of such Shares which would be otherwise Beneficially Owned by such Person in excess of the Ownership Limit; and the intended transferee shall acquire no rights in such Shares;

(iii)  any Transfer that, if effective, would result in the Shares being beneficially owned (as provided in Section 856(a) of the Code) by less than 100 Persons (determined without reference to any rules of attribution) shall be void ab initio as to the Transfer of such Shares which would be otherwise beneficially owned (as provided in Section 856(a) of the Code) by the transferee; and the intended transferee shall acquire no rights in such Shares.

(iv)  any Transfer that, if effective, would result in the Corporation being “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code shall be void ab initio as to the Transfer of the Shares which would cause the Corporation to be “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code; and the intended transferee shall acquire no rights in such Shares.

(B)  Nothing contained in this Article X shall preclude the settlement of any transaction entered into through the facilities of the NYSE. The fact that the settlement of any transaction occurs or takes place shall not negate the effect of any other provision of this Article X and any transferee in such a transaction shall be subject to all of the provisions and limitations set forth in this Article X.

(3)  EXCESS SHARES.

(A)  In the event that, notwithstanding the other provisions contained in this Article X, at any time until the Restriction Termination Date, there is a purported Transfer such that any Person would Beneficially Own Shares in excess of such Person’s Ownership Limit, then, except as otherwise provided in Article X(11), Shares directly owned by such Person in excess of such Person’s Ownership Limit shall be automatically designated as Excess Shares (without reclassification) until such Person does not own Shares in excess of such Person’s Ownership Limit. The designation of such Shares as Excess Shares shall be effective as of the close of business on the business day prior to the date of the purported Transfer. If, after

designation of such Shares owned directly by a Person as Excess Shares, such Person still owns Shares in excess of such Person’s Ownership Limit, Shares Beneficially Owned by such Person constructively in excess of such Person’s Ownership Limit shall be designated as Excess Shares until such Person does not own Shares in excess of such Person’s Ownership Limit. Where such Person owns Shares constructively through one or more Persons and the Shares held by such other Persons must be designated as Excess Shares, the designation of Shares as Excess Shares held by such other Persons shall be pro rata.

(B)  If, notwithstanding the other provisions contained in this Article X, at any time until the Restriction Termination Date, there is a purported Transfer of Shares or any sale, transfer, gift, assignment, devise or other disposition of shares or other interests of a direct or indirect stockholder of the Corporation which, if effective, would cause the Corporation to become “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code, then any Shares being Transferred which would cause the Corporation to be “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code (rounded up to the nearest whole Share) shall be automatically designated as Excess Shares and be treated as provided in this Article X. Such designation and treatment shall be effective as of the close of business on the business day prior to the date of the purported Transfer. If, after the designation of any such Shares as Excess Shares, the Corporation is still “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code, an amount of Shares owned directly by any Person whose Beneficial Ownership of Shares in the Corporation increased as a result of the sale, transfer, gift, assignment, devise or other disposition of shares or other interests of a direct or indirect stockholder of the Corporation and is one of the five Persons who caused the Corporation to be “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code, shall be automatically designated as Excess Shares until the Corporation is not “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code. Where several similarly situated Persons exist, the designation of Shares as Excess Shares shall be pro rata. If, after applying the foregoing provisions the Corporation is still “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code, any Shares constructively owned by such Persons shall be designated as Excess Shares, on a pro rata basis among similarly situated Persons, until the Corporation is not “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code.

(C)  If, at any time until the Restriction Termination Date, an event other than a purported Transfer (an “Event”) occurs which would cause any Person to Beneficially Own Shares in excess of such Person’s Ownership Limit, then, except as otherwise provided in Article X(11), Shares Beneficially Owned by such Person in excess of such Person’s Ownership Limit shall be automatically designated as Excess Shares to the extent necessary to eliminate such excess ownership. The designation of Shares as Excess Shares shall be effective as of the close of business on the business day prior to the date of the Event. In determining which Shares are designated as Excess Shares, Shares Beneficially Owned by any Person who caused the Event to occur shall be designated as Excess Shares before any Shares not so held are designated. Where several similarly situated Persons exist, the designation of Shares as Excess Shares shall be pro rata. If any Person is required to designate Shares as Excess Shares pursuant to this subsection (C), such Person shall first designate Shares directly held by such Person before designating Shares Beneficially Owned constructively. Where such Person owns Shares constructively through one or more Persons and the Shares held by such other Persons must be designated as Excess Shares, the designation of Shares by such other Persons shall be pro rata.

(4)  PREVENTION OF TRANSFER. If the Board of Directors or its designee shall at any time determine in good faith that a Transfer has taken place in violation of Article X(2) or that a Person intends to acquire or has attempted to acquire Beneficial Ownership (determined with or without reference to any rules of attribution) of any Shares in violation of Article X(2), the Board of Directors or its designee shall take such action as it deems advisable to refuse to give effect to or to prevent such Transfer, including, but not limited to, refusing to give effect to such Transfer on the books of the Corporation or instituting proceedings to enjoin such Transfer; provided, however, that any Transfers or attempted Transfers in violation of Article X(2) shall automatically result in the designation and treatment described in Article X(3), irrespective of any action (or non-action) by the Board of Directors.

(5)  NOTICE TO CORPORATION. Any Person who acquires or attempts to acquire Shares in violation of Article X(2), or any Person who is a transferee such that Excess Shares result under Article X(3), shall immediately give written notice or, in the event of a proposed or attempted Transfer, give at least 15 days prior written notice to the Corporation of such event. Such person shall also provide to the Corporation such other

information as the Corporation may request in order to determine the effect, if any, of such Transfer or attempted Transfer on the Corporation’s status as a REIT and shall execute and deliver such instruments and provide such further cooperation and assistance as the Board of Directors deems advisable to preserve the status of the Corporation as a REIT.

(6)  INFORMATION FOR CORPORATION. Until the Restriction Termination Date:

(A)  every Beneficial Owner of more than 1% (or such other lower percentages as required pursuant to regulations under the Code) of the number or value of any class or series of Common Stock or Preferred Stock of the Corporation shall, within 30 days after January 1 of each year, give written notice to the Corporation stating the name and address of such Beneficial Owner, the number of Shares of such class or series of Common Stock or Preferred Stock Beneficially Owned, and a description of how such Shares are held. Each such Beneficial Owner shall provide to the Corporation such additional information as the Corporation may reasonably request in order to determine the effect, if any, of such Beneficial Ownership on the Corporation’s status as a REIT and to ensure compliance with such Person’s Ownership Limit.

(B)  each Person who is a Beneficial Owner of Shares and each Person (including the stockholder of record) who is holding Shares for a Beneficial Owner shall provide to the Corporation in writing such information with respect to direct, indirect and constructive ownership of Shares as the Board of Directors deems reasonably necessary to comply with the provisions of the Code applicable to a REIT, to determine the Corporation’s status as a REIT, to comply with the requirements of any taxing authority or governmental agency or to determine any such compliance.

(7)  OTHER ACTION BY BOARD. Subject to Article X(2), nothing contained in this Article X shall limit the authority of the Board of Directors to take such other action as it deems necessary or advisable to protect the Corporation and the interests of its stockholders by preservation of the Corporation’s status as a REIT; provided, however, that no provision of this subsection 7 shall preclude the settlement of any transaction entered into through the facilities of the NYSE.

(8)  AMBIGUITIES. In the case of an ambiguity in the application of any of the provisions of this Article X, including any definition contained in Article X(1), the Board of Directors shall have the power to determine the application of the provisions of this Article X with respect to any situation based on the facts known to it. In the event this Article X requires or permits an action by the Board of Directors and the Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended, fails to provide specific guidance with respect to such action, the Board of Directors shall have the power to determine the action to be taken so long as such action is not contrary to the provisions of Article X.

(9)  INCREASE OR DECREASE IN OWNERSHIP LIMIT. Subject to the limitations provided in Article X(10), the Board of Directors may from time to time increase or decrease such Person’s Ownership Limit; provided, however, that any decrease may only be made prospectively as to subsequent holders (other than a decrease as a result of a retroactive change in existing law that would require a decrease to retain REIT status, in which case such decrease shall be effective immediately).

(10)  LIMITATIONS ON CHANGES IN OWNERSHIP LIMITS.

(A)  The Ownership Limit may not be increased if, after giving effect to such increase, five or fewer individual Beneficial Owners of Shares could Beneficially Own, in the aggregate, more than 49% in number or value of the outstanding Shares.

(B)  Prior to the modification of any Ownership Limit pursuant to Article X(9), the Board of Directors may require such opinions of counsel, affidavits, undertakings or agreements as it may deem necessary or advisable in order to determine or ensure the Corporation’s status as a REIT.

(11)  WAIVERS BY THE BOARD. The Board of Directors with a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, an opinion of counsel to the effect that such exemption will not result in the Corporation being “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code, or such other evidence as the Board of Directors deems necessary in its sole discretion may exempt, on such conditions and terms as the Board of Directors deems necessary in its sole discretion, a Person from such Person’s Ownership Limit if the Board of Directors obtains

such representations and undertakings from such Person as the Board of Directors may deem appropriate and such Person agrees that any violation of the terms of such exemption or attempted violation of the same will result in, to the extent necessary, the designation of Shares held by such Person as Excess Shares in accordance with Article X(3).

(12)  LEGEND. Each certificate for Shares:

(a)  shall state that the Corporation will furnish a full statement about certain restrictions on transferability to a stockholder on request and without charge; or

(B) shall bear substantially the following legend:

“The securities represented by this certificate are subject to restrictions on ownership and transfer for the purpose of the Corporation’s maintenance of its status as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Except as otherwise provided pursuant to the Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended, no Person may Beneficially Own Shares in excess of the Ownership Limit (as defined in the Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended) or such greater percentage as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, of the number or value of the outstanding Shares of any class or series of the Common Stock or Preferred Stock of the Corporation. Any Person who attempts or proposes to Beneficially Own Shares in excess of the above limitations must notify the Corporation in writing at least 15 days prior to such proposed or attempted Transfer. All capitalized terms in this legend have the meanings defined in the Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended, a copy of which, including the restrictions on transfer, will be furnished to each stockholder on request and without charge. If the restrictions on transfer are violated, the securities represented hereby which are in excess of the above limitations will be designated and treated as Excess Shares which will be held in trust by the Excess Share Trustee for the benefit of the Charitable Beneficiary.”

(13)  SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Article X or any application of any such provision is determined to be void, invalid or unenforceable by any court having jurisdiction over the issue, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall be affected only to the extent necessary to comply with the determination of such court.

(14)  TRANSFER OF EXCESS SHARES. Upon any purported Transfer that results in Excess Shares pursuant to Article X(3), such Excess Shares shall be deemed to have been transferred on the day prior to the date of the purported Transfer that results in such Excess Shares to the Excess Share Trustee, as trustee of a special trust for the exclusive benefit of the Charitable Beneficiary. The Corporation shall name a Charitable Beneficiary, if one does not already exist, within five days of the discovery of any designation of any Excess Shares; however, the failure to so name a Charitable Beneficiary shall not affect the designation of Shares as Excess Shares or the transfer thereof to the Excess Share Trustee. Excess Shares so held in trust shall be issued and outstanding Shares of the Corporation. The Purported Record Transferee or Purported Record Holder shall have no rights in such Excess Shares except as provided in Article X(17).

(15)  DISTRIBUTIONS ON EXCESS SHARES. Any dividends (whether taxable as a dividend, return of capital or otherwise) on Excess Shares shall be paid to the Excess Share Trust for the benefit of the Charitable Beneficiary. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the Purported Record Transferee shall receive, for each Excess Share, the lesser of (A) the amount per share of any distribution made upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up or (B) the price paid by the Purported Record Transferee for the Excess Shares, or if the Purported Record Transferee did not give value for the Excess Shares, the Fair Market Value of the Excess Shares on the day of the event causing the Excess Shares to be held in trust. Any such dividend paid or distribution paid to the Purported Record Transferee in excess of the amount provided in the preceding sentence prior to the discovery by the Corporation that the Shares with respect to which the dividend or distribution was made had been designated as Excess Shares shall be repaid, upon demand, to the Excess Share Trust for the benefit of the Charitable Beneficiary.

(16)  VOTING OF EXCESS SHARES. The Excess Share Trustee shall be entitled to vote the Excess Shares on behalf of the Charitable Beneficiary on any matter. Subject to Maryland law, any vote cast by a Purported Record Transferee with respect to the Excess Shares prior to the discovery by the Corporation that the Excess Shares were held in trust will be rescinded ab initio; provided, however, that if the Corporation has already taken irreversible action with respect to a merger, reorganization, sale of all or substantially all the assets,

dissolution of the Corporation or other action by the Corporation, then the vote cast by the Purported Record Transferee shall not be rescinded. The owner of the Excess Shares will be deemed to have given an irrevocable proxy to the Excess Share Trustee to vote the Excess Shares for the benefit of the Charitable Beneficiary.

Notwithstanding the provisions of this Article X, until the Corporation has received notification that Excess Shares have been transferred into an Excess Share Trust, the Corporation shall be entitled to rely on its share transfer and other stockholder records for purposes of preparing lists of stockholders entitled to vote at meetings, determining the validity and authority of proxies and otherwise conducting votes of stockholders.

(17)  NON-TRANSFERABILITY OF EXCESS SHARES. Excess Shares shall be transferable only as provided in this Section 17. The Excess Share Trustee may, in the event that the Corporation waives its purchase rights under Section 18, transfer the Shares held in the Excess Share Trust to a Person or Persons whose ownership of such Shares will not violate such Person’s Ownership Limit. If such a transfer is made to such a Person or Persons, the interest of the Charitable Beneficiary shall terminate and proceeds of the sale shall be payable to the Purported Record Transferee and to the Charitable Beneficiary. The Purported Record Transferee shall receive the lesser of (A) the price paid by the Purported Record Transferee for the Shares or, if the Purported Record Transferee did not give value for the Shares, the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the day of the event causing the Shares to be held in trust, or (B) the price received by the Excess Share Trust from the sale or other disposition of the Shares. Any proceeds in excess of the amount payable to the Purported Record Transferee will be paid to the Charitable Beneficiary. The Excess Share Trustee shall be under no obligation to obtain the highest possible price for the Excess Shares. Prior to any transfer of any Excess Shares by the Excess Share Trustee, the Corporation must have waived in writing its purchase rights under Section 18. It is expressly understood that the Purported Record Transferee may enforce the provisions of this Section against the Charitable Beneficiary.

If any of the foregoing restrictions on transfer of Excess Shares is determined to be void, invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, then the Purported Record Transferee may be deemed, at the option of the Corporation, to have acted as an agent of the Corporation in acquiring such Excess Shares in Corporation and to hold such Excess Shares on behalf of the Corporation.

(18)  CALL BY CORPORATION ON EXCESS SHARES. Excess Shares shall be deemed to have been offered for sale to the Corporation, or its designee, at a price per Share equal to the lesser of (A) the price per Share in the transaction that created such Excess Shares (or, in the case of a devise, gift or other transaction in which no value was given for such Excess Shares, the Fair Market Value at the time of such devise, gift or other transaction) and (B) the Fair Market Value of the Excess Shares on the date the Corporation, or its designee, accepts such offer (the “Redemption Price”). The Corporation shall have the right to accept such offer for a period of ninety days after the later of (x) the date of the purported Transfer which resulted in such Excess Shares and (y) the date the Board of Directors determines in good faith that a Transfer resulting in Excess Shares has occurred, if the Corporation does not receive a notice of such Transfer pursuant to Article X(5) but in no event later than a permitted Transfer pursuant to and in compliance with the terms of Article X(17). Unless the Board of Directors determines that it is in the interests of the Corporation to make earlier payments of all of the amount determined as the Redemption Price per Share in accordance with the preceding sentence, the Redemption Price may be payable at the option of the Board of Directors at any time up to but not later than the five years after the date the Corporation accepts the offer to purchase the Excess Shares. In no event shall the Corporation have an obligation to pay interest to the Purported Record Transferee.

(19)  UNDERWRITTEN OFFERINGS. The Ownership Limit shall not apply to the acquisition of Shares or rights, options or warrants for, or securities convertible into, Shares by an underwriter in a public offering; provided that the underwriter makes a timely distribution of such Shares or rights, options or warrants for, or securities convertible into, Shares.

(20)  ENFORCEMENT. The Corporation is authorized specifically to seek equitable relief, including injunctive relief, to enforce the provisions of this Article X.

(21)  NON-WAIVER No delay or failure on the part of the Corporation or the Board of Directors in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any right of the Corporation or the Board of Directors, as the case may be, except to the extent specifically waived in writing.

In connection with the consideration and approval of any management arrangements, including renewals thereof, the Independent Directors shall be provided with such information as is deemed necessary so that such Directors will be fully informed in an impartial manner of all relevant factors with respect to such arrangements including, without limitation, information as to the available alternatives, the nature and quality of the services to be provided, and relevant compensation, operating expense and performance data, and will thereby be in a position to make a reasonable business Judgment with respect to such arrangements on the basis of arm's length bargaining. The minutes of meetings with respect to such determinations shall reflect such considerations.

The provisions of this Section 18 of Article III of these By-Laws are not subject to alteration, modification or repeal by the Board of Directors and may be altered, modified or repealed only by majority vote of the stockholders.