Filed by the Registrant ☑

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

To Our Shareholders:

We will hold our annual meeting of the shareholders of Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on September 2, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. (PT) at the offices of the Company at 2929 California Street, Torrance, California 90503. As further described in the accompanying Proxy Statement, at this meeting we will consider and act upon:

Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) has fixed the close of business on July 13, 2020 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting or any meetings held upon adjournment or postponement of the meeting. Only record holders of our common stock at the close of business on that day will be entitled to vote. A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2020 that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 15, 2020 is enclosed with this notice, but is not part of the proxy soliciting material. Due to the public health impact of coronavirus disease 2019, the Annual Meeting may be held in a virtual-only meeting format. If we decide to hold a virtual-only meeting, we will announce the decision to do so in advance and you will be provided details on how to participate.

We invite you to attend the meeting and vote in person. If you cannot attend, to assure that you are represented at the meeting, please sign and return the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope. If you attend the meeting, you may vote in person, even if you previously returned a signed proxy.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be Held on September 2, 2020.

Our proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2020 that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 15, 2020 are available at https://materials.proxyvote.com/620071.

By order of the Board of Directors

 

Juliet Stone,
Secretary

Torrance, California
July 24, 2020

In order to assure your representation at the Annual Meeting, you are requested to vote, at your earliest convenience, by any of the methods described in the accompanying Proxy Statement. If you decide to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, any previous vote by proxy will be revoked automatically and only your vote at the Annual Meeting will be counted.

YOUR vote is extremely important.

If you have questions or need assistance voting your shares please contact:

1407 Broadway, 27^th Floor
New York, New York 10018
proxy@mackenziepartners.com
Call Collect: (212) 929-5500
or
Toll-Free (800) 322-2885

Your vote is extremely important, no matter how many or how few shares you own. The Board urges you to vote your shares to elect the Board’s nominees and approve the Fourth Amended and Restated 2010 Incentive Award Plan. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please promptly sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope by following the instructions provided on the enclosed proxy card to be sure that your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting.

We are making this proxy statement available, on or about July 24, 2020, in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors. The proxies are for use at our annual meeting of shareholders, which we will hold at 10:00 a.m. (PT) on September 2, 2020, at the offices of the Company at 2929 California Street, Torrance, California 90503. The proxies will remain valid for use at any meetings held upon adjournment or postponement of that meeting. The record date for the meeting is the close of business on July 13, 2020. All holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice of the meeting and to vote at the meeting and any meetings held upon adjournment or postponement of that meeting. Our principal executive offices are located at 2929 California Street, Torrance, California 90503, and our telephone number is (310) 212-7910. The date of this Proxy Statement is July 24, 2020.

A proxy form is enclosed. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person, please date, sign and return the enclosed proxy as promptly as possible, in the postage prepaid envelope provided, or online at www.proxyvote.com, to ensure that your shares will be voted at the meeting. If we decide to hold a virtual-only meeting, such decision will be announced in advance and details on how to participate will be provided. If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxies at any time prior to the voting at the meeting by submitting a later dated proxy, giving timely written notice of revocation to our secretary or attending the meeting and voting in person. If you are a holder in street name, you may revoke your proxy by following the specific voting directions provided to you by your bank, broker or other intermediary to change or revoke any instructions you have already provided to your bank, broker or other intermediary.

Unless you instruct otherwise in the proxy, any proxy, if not revoked, will be voted at the meeting:

Our only voting securities are the outstanding shares of our common stock. At the record date, we had 19,018,546 shares of common stock outstanding and approximately 11 shareholders of record. If the shareholders of record present in person or represented by their proxies at the meeting hold at least a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock, a quorum will exist for the transaction of business at the meeting. Shareholders of record who abstain from voting, including brokers holding their customers’ shares who cause abstentions to be recorded, are counted as present for quorum purposes.

For each share of common stock, you hold on the record date, you are entitled to one vote on each of the matters that we will consider at this meeting. You are not entitled to cumulate your votes. Brokers holding shares of record for their customers generally are not entitled to vote on certain matters unless their customers give them specific voting instructions. If the broker does not receive specific instructions, the broker will note this on the proxy form or otherwise advise us that it lacks voting authority. The votes that the brokers would have cast if their customers had given them specific instructions are commonly called “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes will be counted for

purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, but will not be counted or deemed to be present or represented for the purpose of determining whether shareholders have approved a matter.

Pursuant to our Amended and Restated By-Laws, the voting standard for the election of directors of the Company in an uncontested election is a majority voting standard. The majority voting standard provides that to be elected in an uncontested election, a director nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast in the election such that the number of shares properly cast “for” the nominee exceeds the number of votes properly cast “against” that nominee, with abstentions and broker non-votes not counting as votes “for” or “against.” “Votes cast” means the votes actually cast “for” or “against” a particular proposal, whether in person or by proxy. In contested elections where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, the voting standard is a plurality of votes cast.

We also have adopted a director election and resignation policy (the “Director Election Policy”). The Director Election Policy requires an incumbent director, in order to be nominated by our Board of Directors for re-election as a director, to tender an irrevocable resignation effective upon (1) the failure to receive the required number of votes for re-election and (2) the acceptance of the director’s resignation by our Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Directors will assess the appropriateness of such nominee continuing to serve as a director and will recommend to our Board of Directors the action to be taken with respect to such tendered resignation. The Director Election Policy requires that we promptly disclose the decision of our Board of Directors with respect to the tendered resignation in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) of a current report on Form 8-K.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting by the holders of shares entitled to vote is required to approve Proposal No. 2 (ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021). The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting by the holders of shares entitled to vote is required to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, Proposal No. 3 (advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers). The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting by the holders of shares entitled to vote is required to approve Proposal No. 4 (approval of Fourth Amended and Restated 2010 Incentive Award Plan). An abstention from voting on these matters will be treated as “present” for quorum purposes. However, since an abstention is not treated as a “vote” for or against these matters, it will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Broker non-votes will not be counted and will have no effect on the outcome of the voting for these matters.

We will pay for the cost of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing this proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy to our shareholders, if requested, as well as the cost of soliciting proxies relating to the meeting. We have requested banks and brokers to solicit their customers who beneficially own our common stock in nominee name. We will reimburse these banks and brokers for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses regarding these solicitations. Our officers, directors and employees may supplement this solicitation of proxies by telephone and personal solicitation. We will pay no additional compensation to our officers, directors and employees for these activities. We have engaged MacKenzie Partners, Inc. as our proxy solicitor to solicit proxies for us, at an anticipated cost of approximately $25,000. In addition to the use of mail, solicitation may be made by our proxy solicitor or our employees personally or by telephone, facsimile or electronic transmission.

is a member of the bar of the State of Georgia as well as a Certified Public Accountant. As our most senior executive, Mr. Joffe provides the Board of Directors with insight into our business operations, management and strategic opportunities. His history with our Company and industry experience has led the Board of Directors to conclude that he should serve as a director of our Company.

Scott J. Adelson joined our Board of Directors on January 4, 2008. Mr. Adelson is also a director and member of the compensation committee of QAD Inc., a public software company, since April 2006. Mr. Adelson is Co-President, Global Co-head of Corporate Finance and a Senior Managing Director for Houlihan Lokey, and has served on the firm’s board of directors since 2000, a leading international investment bank. During his 30 plus years with the firm, Mr. Adelson has helped advise hundreds of companies on a diverse and in-depth variety of corporate finance issues, including mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Adelson has written extensively on a number of corporate finance and securities valuation subjects. He is an active member of Board of Directors of various privately-held middle-market businesses, as well as several recognized non-profit organizations, such as the USC Entrepreneur Program. Mr. Adelson holds a bachelor degree from the University of Southern California and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business. Mr. Adelson’s broad business skills and experience, leadership expertise, knowledge of complex global business and financial matters have led the Board of Directors to conclude that he should serve as a director of our Company.

Rudolph J. Borneo joined our Board of Directors on November 30, 2004. Mr. Borneo is the Chairman of our Compensation Committee and a member of our Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Borneo retired from R.H. Macy’s, Inc. on March 31, 2009. At the time of his retirement, his position was Vice Chairman and Director of Stores of Macy’s West, a division of R.H. Macy’s, Inc. Mr. Borneo served as President of Macy’s California from 1989 to 1992 and President of R.H. Macy’s West from 1992 until his appointment as Vice Chairman and Director of Stores in February 1995. In addition, Mr. Borneo is currently Board Chairman of Smoke Eaters Hot Wings Inc., a privately-held company. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration from Monmouth University. Mr. Borneo’s extensive experience in management of employees, organizational management, general business and retail knowledge and financial acumen have led the Board of Directors to conclude that he should serve as a director of our Company.

Dr. David Bryan joined our Board of Directors on June 9, 2016. Dr. Bryan is a member of our Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. In addition to teaching part time in the Economics Department at the University of California at Santa Cruz, Dr. Bryan currently directs The Center for The Common Good, a joint venture of The Herb Alpert Foundation and New Roads School to incubate creative innovation in business, education and community partnerships. In addition, Dr. Bryan consults privately with several Santa Francisco and Los Angeles based not-for-profit and for-profit businesses on matters of board and workplace organization, employee training and online education, and generational workplace dynamics. Dr. Bryan was Co-founder and Founding Head of New Roads School from 1995 to 2013. Dr. Bryan received a B.A. from the State University of New York at Stony Brook, an M.S. from the University of California at Los Angeles and a J.D. and Ph.D. from the State University of New York at Buffalo. Dr. Bryan’s extensive experience in the education industry and a variety of businesses have led the Board of Directors to conclude that he should serve as a director of our Company.

Joseph Ferguson joined our Board of Directors on June 9, 2016. Mr. Ferguson is our Lead Independent Director, and a member of our Audit Committee. Mr. Ferguson is a Co-Founder and Managing Partner at Vicente Capital Partners, a Los Angeles-based investment firm providing capital to privately held growth companies across North America. Prior to co-founding Vicente in 2009, Mr. Ferguson was a partner at Kline Hawkes & Company, which he joined at the firm’s inception in 1995. Mr. Ferguson began his career as an investment banker for Merrill Lynch & Co where he was a member of the Energy and Natural Resources Group and the General Corporate Finance Group. From 1989 to 1994, he worked on over 30 public and private transactions for numerous emerging growth and middle market companies. Mr. Ferguson currently serves on the board of directors of SMT and Intellectual Technology, Inc., each of which is privately-held. Mr. Ferguson received a B.B.A in Finance from Southern Methodist University and an M.B.A from the UCLA Anderson School of Management. Mr. Ferguson’s business skills and experience, leadership expertise, knowledge of complex global business and financial matters have led the Board of Directors to conclude that he should serve as a director of our Company.

Philip Gay joined our Board of Directors on November 30, 2004. He chairs our Audit Committee and is a member of our Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Gay currently serves as Managing Director of Triple Enterprises, a business advisory service firm that assists mid-cap sized companies with financing, mergers and acquisitions and strategic financing, which he had previously managed from March 2000 until June

2004. From April 2018 through January 2020, Mr Gay has served as co-CEO of Giggles N Hugs, Inc., a publicly-traded company. From March 2015 to May 2015 Mr. Gay served as a director and chief executive officer at Diego Pellicer Worldwide Inc., a publicly-traded company. From July 2006 until June 2010, Mr. Gay served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Grill Concepts, Inc., a company that operates a chain of upscale casual restaurants throughout the United States. From March 2000 to November 2001, Mr. Gay served as an independent consultant with El Paso Energy from time to time and assisted El Paso Energy with its efforts to reduce overall operating and manufacturing overhead costs. Previously he has served as chief financial officer for California Pizza Kitchen (1987 to 1994) and Wolfgang Puck Food Company (1994 to 1996), and he has held various Chief Operating Officer and Chief Executive Officer positions at Color Me Mine and Diversified Food Group from 1996 to 2000. Mr. Gay is also a retired Certified Public Accountant, a former audit manager at Laventhol and Horwath and a graduate of the London School of Economics. Mr. Gay’s leadership experience, general business knowledge, financial literacy and expertise, accounting skills and competency and overall financial acumen have led the Board of Directors to conclude that he should serve as a director of our Company.

Duane Miller joined our Board of Directors on June 5, 2008. Mr. Miller is the Chairman of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of our Audit and Compensation Committees. Mr. Miller is now a consultant to the Flint & Genesee Chamber of Commerce. Prior to consulting, he was their Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of the Flint & Genesee Chamber of Commerce from October 2009 to October 2017, focusing on Economic, Business and Community Development, and After-School Programs. Prior to joining the Flint & Genesee Chamber of Commerce, he was employed by the City of Flint, Michigan, as the Director of Government Operations, from February 2009 to August 2009. Mr. Miller retired from General Motors Corporation in April 2008 after 37 years of service. At the time of his retirement, Mr. Miller served as executive director, GM Service and Parts Operations (“SPO”) Field Operations where he was responsible for all SPO field activities, running GM Parts (OE), AC Delco (after-market) and GM Accessories business channels, as well as SPO’s Global Independent Aftermarket. Mr. Miller served on the Board of Directors of OEConnection, an automotive ecommerce organization focused on applying technology to provide supply chain solutions and analysis. He previously served on the Boards of Directors for: McLaren Regional Medical Center in Flint, Michigan, the Genesee Health Coalition, and the Prima Civitas Foundation, headquartered in Lansing, Michigan. His experience also includes serving on the Boards of Directors and a member of its audit and compensation committees of the Urban League of Flint, Michigan, the Boys and Girls Club of Flint, Michigan and the Flint/Genesee County Convention and Visitor’s Bureau. Mr. Miller earned a Bachelor of Science degree in marketing from Western Michigan University, and attended the Executive Development Program at the University of California Berkeley, Haas School of Business. Mr. Miller’s significant experience with the automotive parts industry, combined with his organizational, management and business understanding, have led the Board of Directors to conclude that he should serve as a director of our Company.

Jeffrey Mirvis joined our Board of Directors on February 3, 2009. Mr. Mirvis is a member of our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Mirvis is currently the Chief Executive Officer of MGT Industries, Inc. (“MGT”), a privately-held apparel company based in Los Angeles. As Chief Executive Officer of MGT, Mr. Mirvis successfully moved all production and sourcing to Asia. During his nineteen-year tenure as chief executive, Mr. Mirvis has gained valuable knowledge of manufacturing in Asia. Prior to joining MGT in 1990, Mr. Mirvis served as a commercial loan officer at Union Bank of California following his completion of the Union Bank of California’s Commercial Lending Program. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from the University of California at Santa Barbara. He served as a board member of Wildwood School in Los Angeles, for nine years. Mr. Mirvis’ international business experience, operational and production expertise, leadership experience and organizational management have led the Board of Directors to conclude he should serve as a director of our Company.

Barbara L. Whittaker joined our Board of Directors on February 21, 2017. Ms. Whittaker is a member of our Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees. Ms. Whittaker is a business strategist and procurement and supply chain expert with extensive experience in the automotive industry, with both original equipment manufacturers and suppliers, and in the aftermarket. In 2010 Ms. Whittaker founded BW Limited LLC, which provides companies business and procurement strategies that lead to improved performance. Previously, Ms. Whittaker worked for the General Motors Corporation and Delphi Automotive in leadership positions of increasing responsibility. Prior to her retirement from General Motors, Ms. Whittaker’s position was Executive Director of Global Purchasing. Ms. Whittaker previously served in Chevrolet’s Division of General Motors Corporation in Production Control and Scheduling, with an emphasis on Supply Chain. Ms. Whittaker holds a

Bachelor of Industrial Administration degree from General Motors Institute (now Kettering University), MBA degree from Wayne State University, and has also completed the Advanced Management Program at INSEAD in France, and the Executive Development program at University of Michigan. In addition to this formal education, she holds Six Sigma Green Belt certification and is well versed in lean production systems (including General Motors’ Global Manufacturing System). She currently serves on the board of directors of ChannelNet and has also held board of director’s positions for Detroit Manufacturing Systems and Piston Group, each of which is privately held. Ms. Whittaker’s automotive experience, supply chain expertise, leadership experience and organizational management have led the Board of Directors to conclude that she should serve as a director of our company.

Our corporate governance policies and practices reflect our values, and allow our Board to effectively oversee our company in the interest of creating long-term value. The key elements of our program and their benefits to our shareholders are described below.

The mission of Motorcar Parts of America is to be The Global Leader for Parts and Solutions that Move Our World Today and Tomorrow — driven by an EPICQ set of core values embraced by our employees and directors every day:

E – Excellence
P – Passion / Productivity
I – Integrity / Innovation
C – Community
Q – Quality

Since its establishment in 1968, environmental and sustainable processes have been a hallmark of the company. Today, Motorcar Parts of America is the leading supplier of remanufactured starters and alternators, with an expanding line of additional non-discretionary aftermarket hard parts that meet or exceed OE standards. With the potential to reduce material and energy consumption by up to 95 percent, remanufacturing is the most efficient and sustainable process for producing aftermarket replacement parts, making Motorcar Parts of America’s business practices green by nature.

Highlights of the eco-friendly remanufacturing process, include:

The remanufacturing process preserves the energy required in forging and forming durable components, an advantage to recycling alone; and, it allows for recycling of metal scrap, such as copper, aluminum, and steel. Equally important, by reclaiming and reconditioning components, the remanufacturing process also conserves the energy and materials that would be required to create new parts. Manufacturing one new starter for instance requires more than 10 times the amount of energy and nine times the amount of materials compared with producing remanufactured parts. Manufacturing a new alternator requires approximately seven times the amount of energy and eight times the amount of raw material necessary to produce a remanufactured part. The energy savings translates into lower carbon dioxide output and overall lower consumption. In fact, by some estimates, remanufactured products conserve roughly the equivalent of 400 trillion BTUs of energy per year. The remanufacturing process employed by Motorcar Parts of America takes real steps to mitigate the effects of climate change, by drastically reducing the greenhouse gas emissions that are normally generated by producing new parts.

The company is firmly committed to being socially responsible, particularly during the current global pandemic and the impact it is having on employees, family members, and the community at large. Management believes strongly in respect, tolerance, and diversity. It seeks to nurture this spirit daily. Equally important is the company’s

commitment to health and safety and the welfare of its employees — supported by the availability of medical professionals onsite or within close proximity to its operations. The company’s many socially responsible initiatives include subsidized food programs for certain employees and donations to community organizations, sponsorship of sport teams and weekend family events.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that provides policies for various matters relating to the conduct of our business, including the following key matters:

The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is filed with the SEC and a copy is posted on our website at www.motorcarparts.com. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of the code, or waivers of such provisions granted to executive officers and directors, on our website within four business days following the date of such amendment or waivers. We will provide a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to any person without charge, upon request addressed to the Corporate Secretary at Motorcar Parts of America, Inc., 2929 California Street, Torrance, CA 90503.

Our Board has adopted a number of other policies and guidelines that are intended to ensure good governance and the alignment of interests between the directors and management, on the one hand, and shareholders on the other. Among the written policies are:

As discussed above, we have a written policy applicable to any transaction, arrangement or relationship between us and a related party. Our practice with regards to related party transactions has been for our Audit Committee to review, approve and/or ratify such transactions as they arise in accordance with the policy.

Board Independence. Each of Scott Adelson, Rudolph J. Borneo, Dr. David Bryan, Joseph Ferguson, Philip Gay, Duane Miller, Jeffrey Mirvis, and Barbara J. Whittaker are independent within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules and the NASDAQ listing standards, and all of our committee members are independent within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards.

Board Leadership Structure. The Board of Directors does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board as the Board of Directors believes it is in the best interests of our Company to make that determination based on the position and direction of our Company and the membership of the Board of Directors. The roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are currently held by the same person, Selwyn Joffe. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Joffe’s service as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer is in the best interest of our Company and its shareholders. Mr. Joffe possesses detailed and in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing our Company and its business and is in the best position to develop agendas that ensure that our Board of Directors’ time and attention are focused on the most critical matters. We believe that our Company has been well served by this model because the combined role of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer has ensured that our directors and senior management act with a common purpose and in the best interest of our Company. This model enhances our ability to communicate clearly and consistently with our shareholders, employees, customers and suppliers.

Lead Independent Director. Our Board has appointed Joseph Ferguson as our Lead Independent Director to preside at executive sessions of independent directors.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight. Our Board of Directors as a whole has responsibility for risk oversight with certain categories of risk being reviewed by particular committees of the Board of Directors, which report to the full Board of Directors as needed. The Audit Committee reviews the financial risks, including internal control, audit, financial reporting and disclosure matters, by discussing these risks with management and our internal and external auditors. The Compensation Committee reviews risks relating to our executive compensation plans and arrangements. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews risks related to our governance structure and processes and risks arising from related person transactions. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board of Directors is regularly informed about such risks.

Attendance of Board and Committees. Our Board of Directors met seven times during Fiscal 2020. Each of our then directors attended 75% or more of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and committees thereof during Fiscal 2020. Our last annual meeting of shareholders was held on September 5, 2019. All of our then directors attended our last annual meeting of shareholders. Each director is encouraged to attend each meeting of the Board of Directors and the annual meeting of our shareholders.

Audit Committee. The current members of our Audit Committee are Philip Gay, Rudolph Borneo, Joseph Ferguson, Duane Miller, and Jeffrey Mirvis, with Mr. Gay serving as chairman. Our Board of Directors has determined that all of the Audit Committee members are independent within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards. Our Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. Gay, Mr. Ferguson and Mr. Mirvis are financial expert within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules. The Audit Committee oversees our auditing procedures, receives and accepts the reports of our independent registered public accountants, oversees our internal systems of accounting and management controls and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the appointment of our auditors. The Audit Committee met eight times in Fiscal 2020.

Compensation Committee. The current members of our Compensation Committee are Rudolph Borneo, Dr. David Bryan, Philip Gay, Duane Miller, Jeffrey Mirvis and Barbara Whittaker, with Mr. Borneo serving as chairman. The Compensation Committee is responsible for developing our executive compensation policies. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for evaluating the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and other senior officers and making determinations concerning the salary, bonuses and equity-based awards to be awarded to these officers. No member of the Compensation Committee has a relationship that would constitute an interlocking relationship with the executive officers or directors of another entity. For further discussion of our Compensation Committee, see “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.” The Compensation Committee met four times in Fiscal 2020.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The current members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Rudolph J. Borneo, David Bryan, Philip Gay, Duane Miller, Jeffrey Mirvis and Barbara Whittaker, with Mr. Miller serving as Chairman. Each of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for maintaining strong corporate governance within the board and the Company as a whole, as well as identifying, vetting and ultimately nominating candidates to our Board of Directors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met twice during Fiscal 2020.

In evaluating potential director nominees, including those identified by shareholders, for recommendation to our Board of Directors, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks individuals with talent, ability and experience from a wide variety of backgrounds to provide a diverse spectrum of experience and expertise relevant to a diversified business enterprise such as ours. Our Company does not maintain a separate policy regarding the diversity of its board members. However, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers individuals with diverse and varied professional and other experiences for membership. A candidate should represent the interests of all shareholders, and not those of a special interest group, have a reputation for integrity and be willing to make a significant commitment to fulfilling the duties of a director. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will screen and evaluate all recommended director nominees based on the criteria set forth above, as well as other relevant considerations. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will retain full discretion in considering its nomination recommendations to our Board of Directors.

We actively engage with our shareholders, in person, by phone and through written correspondence. During Fiscal 2020, we met in person with most of our largest shareholders and many other shareholders. We take into account feedback received during those meetings and are constantly looking for ways to improve our corporate governance and executive compensation practices. In particular, as a result of such feedback, most of our equity awards should be performance based starting in 2021.

Our NEOs (other than executive officers who are also members of our Board of Directors), their ages and present positions with our Company, are as follows:

Our executive officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors. A brief description of the business experience of each of our executive officers other than executive officers who are also members of our Board of Directors and significant employees is set forth below.

David Lee has been our Chief Financial Officer since February 2008. Prior to this, Mr. Lee served as our Vice President of Finance and Strategic Planning since January 2006, focusing primarily on financial management and strategic planning. Mr. Lee joined us in February 2005 as a Director of Finance and Strategic Planning. His primary responsibilities as Chief Financial Officer are treasury, budgeting and financial management. From August 2002 until he joined us in 2005, he served as corporate controller of Palace Entertainment, Inc., an amusement and water park organization. Prior to this, Mr. Lee held various corporate controller and finance positions for several domestic companies and served in the audit department of Deloitte LLP (formerly known as Deloitte & Touche LLP). Mr. Lee is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Lee earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from the University of California, San Diego, and a Masters in Business Administration degree from the UCLA Anderson School of Management.

Richard Mochulsky has been our Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing since May 2019. Mr. Mochulsky joined the Company in 2005 as a Director of Traditional Sales, and became VP of Traditional Sales in 2009, before taking over the entire sales function in 2011 as VP of Sales. He was promoted to SVP of Sales in 2015. Mr. Mochulsky has been in the auto parts business since 1979, starting his career at Dayco Rubber Company, before taking positions at Four Seasons a division of Standard Motor Parts, and Compressorworks.

Douglas Schooner has been our Chief Manufacturing Officer since June 2014. In May 2017, Mr. Schooner also became our Senior Vice President, Operations for the Under-the-Car Product Lines. Mr. Schooner joined us in 1993 and became the Vice President, Global Manufacturing Operations in January 2001 until his promotion in June 2014. Mr. Schooner has held the positions of Engineer, Production Manager, Assistant Vice President, Production and Vice President, Manufacturing prior to assuming his current position with our company. As Chief Manufacturing Officer, Mr. Schooner is responsible for all manufacturing, materials and logistic operations for our facilities. Mr. Schooner has a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the California State University, Long Beach.

Michael Umansky was our Vice President and General Counsel from January 2004 to September 2019, he acted as Corporate Counsel from September 2019 to the present. He acted as Corporate Secretary from September 2005 to September 2019. Mr. Umansky was a partner of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, and the founding and managing partner of its Los Angeles office from 1975 until 1997 and was Of Counsel to that firm from 1998 to July 2001. Immediately prior to joining our Company, Mr. Umansky was in the private practice of law, and during 2002 and 2003, he provided legal services to us. From February 2000 until March 2001, Mr. Umansky was Vice President, Administration and Legal, of Hiho Technologies, Inc., a venture capital financed producer of workforce management software. Mr. Umansky is admitted to practice law in California and New York and is a graduate of The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard Law School.

There are no family relationships among our directors or named executive officers. There are no material proceedings to which any of our directors or executive officers or any of their associates, is a party adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries, or has a material interest adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries. To our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has been convicted in a criminal proceeding during the last ten years (excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors), and none of our directors or executive officers was a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the last ten years (except for any matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement) that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state

securities laws. To our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers are subject to any petition under federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing, with the following exception: to the extent that such persons were involved in bankruptcy proceedings related to the Company’s subsidiary.

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. Based solely on our review of copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from reporting persons that no such forms were required for those persons, we believe that our insiders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements during Fiscal 2020.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation program for our named executive officers for Fiscal 2020, who were:

The following discussion and analysis of compensation arrangements of our named executive officers for Fiscal 2020 should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth below. This discussion contains certain forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations and determinations regarding future compensation programs. Actual compensation programs that we adopt in the future may differ materially from currently planned programs as summarized in this discussion.

The retention of experienced, highly-capable and dedicated executives is crucial to the long-term success of our Company. To achieve the goal of recruiting, retaining and motivating our executives, our Compensation Committee has developed an overall executive compensation program that rewards these employees for their contributions to our Company.

The primary objectives of our practices with respect to executive compensation are to:

With our compensation objectives in mind, as further described below, our executive officer compensation program consists of five primary elements:

Base Salary. Base salary is the “fixed” component of our executive compensation intended to meet the objective of attracting and retaining the executive officers of superior talent that are necessary to manage and lead our Company.

Annual Cash Incentive Plan. We use a cash-based incentive plan to motivate the achievement of key pre-determined financial and individual performance goals.

Longer-term, Equity-Based Incentive Plan. Equity awards are a part of our overall executive compensation program to align the interests of our executives with those of shareholders while rewarding individual performance and ensuring we offer competitive compensation levels. Starting in Fiscal 2021 most equity awards will be performance based.

Deferred Compensation Benefits. We offer participation in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan to selected executive officers which provides unfunded, non-tax qualified deferred compensation benefits. We believe this program helps promote the retention of our senior executives. Participants may elect to contribute a portion of their cash compensation to the plan. In addition, for Fiscal 2020 we made matching contributions of 100% of each participant’s elective contributions to the plan up to 3% of the participant’s cash compensation for the year.

Other Benefits. We provide to our executive officers medical benefits that are generally available to our other employees. Executives are also eligible to participate in our other broad-based employee benefit plans, such as our long and short-term disability, life insurance and 401(k) plan. In addition, Mr. Joffe and Mr. Umansky receive automobile allowances (Mr. Umansky’s automobile allowance ended in September 2019). The Company pays an allowance of $24,000 per year, as part of Mr. Joffe’s base salary, to allow him to pay for disability insurance policy premiums. The value of executive perquisites is not a significant component of our executive compensation program.

We believe that a significant portion of executive officer compensation should be at-risk and dependent upon the achievement of measurable and objective performance metrics. In Fiscal 2020, the Annual Cash Incentive Awards for all NEOs were based on the achievement of pre-determined objective metrics of the Company and each individual NEO. Approximately 50% of the Chief Executive Officer’s total direct Fiscal 2020 compensation is comprised of stock and option awards (the “Equity Component”), including performance-based restricted stock awards (Mr. Joffe waived his right to receive the performance-based restricted stock, due under this Employment Agreement, in Fiscal 2020). These awards are subject to fluctuations in the Company’s stock price, which we believe aligns his interests with the interests of the Company’s shareholders going forward. This percentage compares with an Equity Component percentage of approximately 75% in Fiscal 2019 and 37% in Fiscal 2018. We believe the Equity Component of Mr. Joffe’s total direct compensation aligns his incentives with the interests of our shareholders. Starting in Fiscal 2021 the great majority of Mr. Joffe’s Equity Component will consist of performance based awards, even better aligning his compensation with the interests of our shareholders.

The individual performance metrics used for the past three fiscal years and continuing into Fiscal 2021 focus on the transformation of our business including the launch of our new full line brake program, consolidation of our operations into low cost countries, and electric vehicle and aerospace initiatives. We continue to invest in infrastructure and production processes needed for long term growth of the MPAA franchise while balancing it with our short term performance objectives. Notwithstanding the effects of COVID-19, we believe our investments are bearing fruit and will continue to accelerate in the coming periods.

Starting in Fiscal 2021, the Company intends to tie the payment of the Annual Cash Incentive Awards as well as the majority of all Equity Awards granted to objective performance standards for all NEOs.

Moreover, we believe that the compensation program should serve the interests of shareholders. Accordingly, we have adopted various policies and practices that we believe are in shareholders’ interests, including

As discussed above under “Governance Policies and Guidelines—Stock Ownership Guidelines,” we have also adopted stock ownership guidelines, pursuant to which each of our directors and executive officers are required to hold a certain number of shares of our common stock, within a specified timeframe.

At the Annual Meeting held on September 5, 2019, approximately 40.2% of the votes cast by our shareholders approved the non-binding advisory vote related to executive compensation. As a result, we engaged and expect to continue to engage our shareholders to understand their concerns with our executive compensation program, and with the goal of enhancing our shareholder communications. After our 2019 Annual Meeting, we held discussions with the majority of our top-ten shareholders comprising more than 50% of our total shares outstanding, regarding executive compensation and other governance and business performance issues. Feedback from shareholders indicated a lack of clarity regarding the relationship between the Company’s performance-based targets and the underlying metrics relative to the Company’s performance and commitment to enhancing shareholder value.

In response to this input, we implemented a more balanced approach at setting targets taking into account both short-term financial and operating targets including additional strategic metrics which we believe will enhance longer-term performance and stockholder value. In order to provide our Compensation Committee sufficient time to develop performance targets for our long-term equity incentive awards, our CEO agreed to not receive his performance-based annual restricted stock award in Fiscal Year 2020; a restricted stock award was granted, subject to performance metrics, in the second quarter of Fiscal Year 2021.

The Company is focused on positioning itself with a sustainable growth model. This model is based on two key fundamental additions to its current business: Firstly, expanding its product offering in the hard parts aftermarket, focused on the brake category; and, secondly, expanding the Company’s electrification technology for vehicle and aerospace applications. We have crafted specific performance-based metrics which we believe if accomplished will enhance shareholder value. These goals have been incorporated into our current incentive programs for Fiscal 2021.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing, developing and maintaining our executive compensation program. The role of the Compensation Committee is to oversee our compensation and benefits plans and policies, administer our equity incentive plans and review and approve all compensation decisions relating to all executive officers and directors. In order for the Compensation Committee to perform its function, the following process for determining executive compensation decisions has been followed.

For Fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee did not retain a compensation consultant, but reviewed prior fiscal years. In Fiscal 2019, the Compensation Committee retained Willis Towers Watson (“Towers”) to review long-term incentive (“LTI”) awards for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee previously retained Towers to review various aspects of Director and Executive Compensation, (collectively all of their reports, “The Towers Reports”). Towers does not perform any other consulting work or any other services for our Company, reports directly to the Compensation Committee, and takes direction from the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Towers pursuant to the rules prescribed by the SEC and has concluded that no conflict of interest existed or currently exists that would prevent Towers from serving as an independent consultant to the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee considered analysis and advice contained in the Towers Reports when making compensation decisions for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives with regard to Fiscal 2020 compensation, including Towers’ input on performance-based vesting for our CEO’s equity compensation.

Peer Group. While the Compensation Committee does not itself undertake a formalized benchmarking process, it did review the assessment provided by Towers detailing the competitiveness of our executive compensation relative to that of a peer group Towers established when making its executive compensation decisions. Towers used the following peer companies in reviewing our compensation levels in Fiscal 2017: Dorman Products Inc., Fox Factor Holding Corp., Horizon Global Corporation, Modine Manufacturing Co., Myers Industries, Inc., Shiloh Industries Inc., Spartan Motors Inc., Standard Motor Products Inc., Stoneridge Inc., Strattec Security Corp., Gentherm, Inc., Superior Industries International Inc. and Voxx Internaional Corporation. Towers selected these companies because of their close similarity to the Company in terms of industry, revenue and market capitalization. The Compensation Committee believed that this peer group remained appropriate for assessing the competitiveness of our executive compensation program for Fiscal 2020.

Fiscal 2017 Review. In reaching its executive compensation decisions for Fiscal 2020, the Committee considered analysis and advice contained in the Fiscal 2017 Review regarding the competitiveness of our executive compensation program in comparison to our peer group and compensation surveys. The Compensation Committee determined that overall the compensation levels reviewed by Towers were within the competitive range with variations by position. The compensation levels assessed by Towers were based on actual payments or grants, as the case may be, of base salary, bonuses and long-term incentive grants. In reaching its conclusions, Towers applied the following standards for determining that executive compensation, other than the CEO, is in line with competitive market practices: base salary paid is between 90% and 110% of the median base salary; total cash compensation (base salary plus bonus) is between 85% and 115% of the median total cash compensation; and total direct compensation (total cash compensation plus long-term incentive grants) is between 80% and 120% of the median total direct compensation.

of their performance metrics. The Company believes that the strategic initiatives supported by each of the Individual Goals has an immediate positive impact and more importantly will be critical to achievement of the Company’s five-year revenue growth and shareholder value targets. Please see below for more details related to each NEO’s Individual Goals.

The following table sets forth each executive’s aggregate cash-based incentive opportunity and actual incentive payments earned with respect to Fiscal 2020.

Equity-Based Incentive Program. The goals of our long-term, equity-based incentive awards are to align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our common shareholders. Because vesting is generally based on continued service, in addition to other performance-based metrics in some cases, our equity-based incentives also encourage the retention of our named executive officers during the award vesting period. In determining the number of stock options and/or restricted stock to be granted to executives, we consider the total value of the compensation opportunity afforded to each named executive officer and the competitive levels paid by our peers, as well as the individual’s position, scope of responsibility, ability to affect profits and shareholder value.

The following table sets forth the number of shares covered by the option and restricted stock unit awards granted to each named executive officer in Fiscal 2020.

Each stock option and restricted stock unit award vests over a three-year period, subject to continued employment. As discussed above, Mr. Joffe determined to waive his right to the 75,000 restricted stock due under the Second Amendment to the CEO Employment Agreement, and instead agreed to receive up to 100,000 restricted stock in each of Fiscal 2021, 2022 and 2023 under the Third Amendment to the CEO Employment Agreement, effective March 30, 2020.

Employee Benefits. All of our full-time employees, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our health and welfare plans. The Company does not provide pension benefits, other than matching contributions under the Company’s 401(k) retirement plan and non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The Company may also from time to time provide perquisites such as Company-paid or reimbursed automobiles, additional coverage under our medical plans and participation in deferred compensation plans, as discussed in this proxy statement.

Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 162(m) generally provides that public companies cannot deduct compensation paid to its covered employees in excess of $1 million per year. Prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of

2017 (the “Act”), covered employees generally consisted of a corporation’s chief executive officer and each of its other three most highly compensated officers, other than its chief financial officer, and remuneration that qualified as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of the IRC was exempt from this $1 million deduction limitation. As part of the Act, the ability to rely on this exemption was, with certain limited exceptions, eliminated. In addition, the determination of covered employees was generally expanded. In light of the repeal of the performance-based compensation exception to IRC Section 162(m), we may not be able to take a deduction for any compensation in excess of $1 million that is paid to a covered employee. As has historically been the case, we continue to have the discretion to determine the compensation for our executives that we determine to be appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

In limited circumstances, we may agree to make certain items of income payable to our named executive officers tax-neutral to them. Accordingly, we have agreed to gross-up certain payments to our Chief Executive Officer to cover any excise taxes (and related income taxes on the “gross-up” payment) that he may be obligated to pay with respect to the first $3,000,000 of “parachute payments” (as defined in IRC Section 280G) to be made to him upon a change of control of our Company.

ASC Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, or ASC Topic 718, requires us to recognize an expense for the fair value of equity-based compensation awards. Grants of stock options and restricted stock under our equity incentive award plans are accounted for under ASC Topic 718. The Compensation Committee regularly considers the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with decisions that relate to our equity incentive award plans and programs. As accounting standards change, we may revise certain programs to appropriately align accounting expenses of our equity awards with our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Rudolph Borneo, Chairman
Dr. David Bryan
Philip Gay
Duane Miller
Jeffrey Mirvis
Barbara Whittaker

The preceding “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section generally describes our compensation policies, plans and practices that are applicable for our executives and management. Our Compensation Committee reviews the relationship between our risk management policies and practices, corporate strategy and compensation practices. Our Compensation Committee has determined that these plans and practices, as applied to all of our employees, including our executive officers, does not encourage excessive risk taking at any level of our Company. The Compensation Committee does not believe that risks arising from its compensation plans, policies or practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company. Risk related to compensation is also reviewed as part of the Company’s overall compliance process overseen by the Audit Committee of the Company.

The following table summarizes information regarding equity awards granted to our named executive officers that remain outstanding as of March 31, 2020.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding contributions, earnings and account balances under our Amended and Restated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”), our only defined contribution plan that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not-tax qualified, for each of the named executive officers for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. Plan participants may elect to receive distributions under the DCP as lump sums or in installments. Mr. Joffe has elected to receive lump sum distributions in the case of death, disability or separation of service. Per Mr. Umansky’s election, the Company distributed the monies owed to him under the DCP in February 2020. A description of the other material terms and conditions of the DCP follows.

The following table shows our contribution to each named executive officer’s account:

We maintain the Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. Amended and Restated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan for a select group of management or highly compensated employees, including our named executive officers. Participants in the plan may elect to defer up to 100% of their gross cash compensation. We made matching contributions of 100% of each participant’s elective contributions to the plan, up to 3% of the participant’s compensation for the plan year. The plan is designed to defer taxation to the participant on contributions and notional earnings thereon until distribution thereof in accordance with a participant’s previously made distribution elections. Insurance annuity contracts provide funding for the plan, however, the annuity contracts are owned by us and remain subject to claims of our general creditors.

On May 18, 2012, we entered into an employment agreement (the “2012 Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Joffe, which terminated and superseded Mr. Joffe’s previous employment agreement that was to expire on August 31, 2012. The 2012 Employment Agreement provided for Mr. Joffe to serve as our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer for a term expiring on August 31, 2015, unless extended or earlier terminated. Pursuant to the 2012 Employment Agreement, Mr. Joffe’s base salary was set at $600,000 per year, to be reviewed from time to time in

accordance with our established procedures for adjusting salaries for similarly situated employees. The 2012 Employment Agreement also provided that Mr. Joffe was eligible to participate in our Annual Incentive Plan adopted and amended from time to time by the Board (the “Annual Incentive Plan”), with a target bonus equal to 100% of Mr. Joffe’s salary (the “Annual Incentive Bonuses”).

In June 2014, the Company and Mr. Joffe entered into Amendment No. 1 to the 2012 Employment Agreement pursuant to which, effective as of July 1, 2014, (i) the last day of Mr. Joffe’s term of employment was changed from August 31, 2015 to July 1, 2019 and (ii) his base salary was increased from $600,000 to $700,000 per year. All other terms and conditions of the 2012 Employment Agreement remained the same. The 2012 Employment Agreement provided for the review of Mr. Joffe’s base salary from time to time. During Fiscal 2018, the Board approved Mr. Joffe’s base salary increase to $752,960 per annum.

In February 2019, the Company and Mr. Joffe entered into Amendment No. 2 to the 2012 Employment Agreement which, among other things, (i) changed the last day of Mr. Joffe’s term of employment from July 1, 2019 to July 1, 2023, (ii) provided that Mr. Joffe shall receive a long term incentive compensation opportunity in the amount of no less than 75,000 shares of restricted stock on an annual basis for each of five fiscal years commencing with Fiscal 2019 (each such fiscal year a “Performance Cycle”), with the vesting of such restricted stock based on the achievement of specified performance measures set annually (the “Restricted Stock Awards”), (iii)) made certain changes to the compensation paid to Mr. Joffe in the event that he terminates his employment with the Company following a breach by the Company or other good reason or is terminated by the Company without cause, and (iv) made certain changes to the compensation paid to Mr. Joffe in the event of a change of control of the Company.

In March 2020, the Company and Mr. Joffe entered into Amendment No. 3 to the 2012 Employment Agreement under which (i) Mr. Joffe agreed to not receive an annual Restricted Stock Award with respect to the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2020, and instead increased his potential annual Restricted Stock Award for the next three fiscal years (ending March 31, 2021, March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023), from 75,000 to 100,000 shares, (ii) the timing of each fiscal year’s Performance Cycle was slightly changed, to be on or as soon as practicable after the first date of the fiscal year, rather than prior to the start of each fiscal year, and (iii) the raw number of Restricted Stock that will be granted pursuant to Section 9(d) of the 2012 Employment Agreement, for each Performance Cycle commencing during the remainder of the Employment Term was changed from 50,000 to 66,667, to maintain the same percentage of the potential grant at two-thirds.

In May 2020, the Company and Mr. Joffe entered into Amendment No. 4 to the 2012 Employment Agreement which allows Mr. Joffe to elect to defer payments of up to 50% of his base salary otherwise payable for that month, less required withholding, for each month, starting in May 2020 through December 2020. Mr. Joffe may request payment, in a timely fashion, of the deferred salary (or portions thereof) at any time at his sole and absolute discretion, provided that all outstanding deferred salary is paid out no later than March 15, 2021. As of the filing of the Proxy, Mr. Joffe has deferred 50% of his base salary for the months of May 2020 – July 2020.

The 2012 Employment Agreement as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, Amendment No. 2 thereto, Amendment No. 3 thereto, and Amendment No. 4, thereto, collectively is referred to below as the “Amended Employment Agreement.”

Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Joffe will also be eligible to receive annual awards under the 2010 Plan in such amounts as are determined by the Compensation Committee as administrator of the 2010 Plan in its sole and absolute discretion (the “Annual Awards”). Such awards may be in the form of options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units or such other form of award as determined by the Compensation Committee as administrator of the 2010 Plan in its sole and absolute discretion.

Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Joffe will also receive: (i) four weeks paid vacation each year during the term of the Amended Employment Agreement pursuant to our written vacation policy; (ii) a $1,500 monthly automobile allowance and payment by us of certain automobile-related expenses; (iii) during the term of the Amended Employment Agreement, if Mr. Joffe does not elect medical insurance coverage for himself and his eligible family through us, an allowance for such medical insurance in an amount equal to the cost which would have been incurred by us in supplying such coverage for Mr. Joffe and his eligible family; and (iv) $24,000 per year to be used by Mr. Joffe to purchase disability insurance for his benefit, which has been included as part of his Base Salary for at least the last five years, (the “Disability Insurance Payment” and, together with the benefits described in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii), the “Benefits”).

The Amended Employment Agreement terminates on the date of Mr. Joffe’s death, in which event his accrued salary and Annual Incentive Bonus, if any, and reimbursable expenses and Benefits owing to him through the date of his death shall be paid to his estate, and his estate shall assume certain of his rights as specified in the Amended Employment Agreement.

In the event that Mr. Joffe’s employment is terminated as result of his physical or mental illness or incapacity as determined in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Amended Employment Agreement, he will be entitled to receive his accrued salary and Annual Incentive Bonus, if any, reimbursable expenses and Benefits owing to him through the date of termination and payment of the benefits pursuant to any disability insurance policy purchased by Mr. Joffe with the Disability Insurance Payment.

In the event that Mr. Joffe’s employment is terminated by us for Cause (as defined in the Amended Employment Agreement), we will be released from any and all further obligations under the Amended Employment Agreement, except that we will pay Mr. Joffe his accrued salary and Annual Incentive Bonus, if any, and reimbursable expenses and Benefits owing to him through the date of his termination.

In the event that Mr. Joffe’s employment is terminated by us without Cause (as defined in the Amended Employment Agreement) or Mr. Joffe voluntarily terminates the Amended Employment Agreement for Good Reason (as defined in the Amended Employment Agreement), then we will pay through the later of the date which is two years after the termination date or the last day of the term of the Amended Employment Agreement: (i) his salary as in effect immediately prior to the termination date; (ii) his average bonus earned for the two years immediately prior to the year in which the Amended Employment Agreement is terminated (or if such termination occurs within the first three months of our fiscal year, for the second and third years preceding the year in which such termination occurs); (iii) the Benefits; (iv) reimbursable expenses and (v) vested but undistributed shares of common stock (see footnote (6) to the table in “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Table” for further details regarding vesting).

If a Change in Control (as defined in the Amended Employment Agreement) occurs and Mr. Joffe voluntarily terminates the Amended Employment Agreement for Good Reason (as defined in the Amended Employment Agreement) or Mr. Joffe’s employment is terminated by us without Cause (as defined in the Amemded Employment Agreement) within two years following a Change in Control, then Mr. Joffe will be entitled to receive either the severance benefit as described in the next sentence of this paragraph or the benefits described in the immediately preceding paragraph, whichever is more favorable to Mr. Joffe, and we will pay Mr. Joffe any reimbursable expenses owed to him through the termination date. The severance benefit will be equal to (i) two times Mr. Joffe’s salary at the annual rate in effect immediately prior to the date of the Change in Control plus (ii) two times Mr. Joffe’s average bonus earned for the two years immediately prior to the year in which the Change in Control occurs. The severance benefit will be paid to Mr. Joffe in a lump sum as soon as practicable, but no later than 30 days following the termination date.

In the event that the benefits provided for in the Amended Employment Agreement or otherwise payable to Mr. Joffe constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and will be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, Mr. Joffe will receive the greater of: (i) the largest portion, up to and including the total, of such benefits or (ii) the largest aggregate amount of such benefits that would result in no portion thereof being subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, whichever amount, after taking into account all applicable federal, state and local employment taxes, income taxes and excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, results in Mr. Joffe’s receipt, on an after-tax basis, of the greatest amount of the benefit.

The Amended Employment Agreement prohibits Mr. Joffe during the term of the Amended Employment Agreement or at any time thereafter from using or disclosing to any third party any of our confidential information and trade secrets. Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement, during the term of the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Joffe is also prohibited from: (i) competing with us; or (ii) soliciting or inducing any creditor, customer, supplier, officer, executive or agent of us or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates to sever its relationship with or leave the employ of any such entities.

In conformity with our policy, all of our directors and officers execute confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements upon the commencement of employment. The agreements generally provide that all inventions or discoveries by the employee related to our business and all confidential information developed or made known to the employee during the term of employment shall be our exclusive property and shall not be disclosed to third parties without our prior approval.

The following table provides an estimate of the inherent value of Mr. Joffe’s employment agreement described above, assuming the agreement was terminated on March 31, 2020, the last business day of Fiscal 2020.

Pursuant to SEC rules, we are providing the following disclosure about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our median employee to the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer.

The annual total compensation of our median employee (among all employees except for our Chief Executive Officer) was $6,598.57. Our Chief Executive Officer’s annual total compensation, as reported in the Total column of the 2020 Summary Compensation Table, was $3,086,945. Based on this information, a reasonable estimate of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the annual total compensation of our median employee (other than our Chief Executive Officer) was approximately 468:1.

We determined to complete a new analysis due to, 1) the addition of employees from our subsidiaries which are now in scope (Dixie Electric and E&M employees (part of MPA), 2) our employees in Asia (China, Malaysia and Singapore) are now in scope since they account for more than 5% of our total global employee population. The population used for the pay ratio analysis was the entire global employee population as of March 31, 2020. We considered a total of 4,080 United States and non-United States employees in determining the median employee. For purposes of identifying the median employee, we utilized actual total cash compensation (as reflected in our payroll records) as the consistently applied compensation measure for all employees. All global

compensation amounts were converted to USD using an average currency exchange rate over the fiscal year. We used a valid statistical sampling of employees that constitute a range of +/-1% around the median employee to select the actual employee represented in the ratio above. Every employee in this range worked at our Tijuana, Mexico facility.

We use a combination of cash and equity incentives to compensate our non-employee directors. Directors who are also our employees received no compensation for their service on our Board of Directors in Fiscal 2020. To determine the appropriate level of compensation for our non-employee directors, we take into consideration the significant amount of time and dedication required by the directors to fulfill their duties on our Board of Directors and Board of Directors committees as well as the need to continue to attract highly qualified candidates to serve on our Board of Directors. The information provided in the following table reflects the compensation received or earned by our directors for their service on our Board of Directors in Fiscal 2020.

Each of our non-employee directors receives annual compensation of $40,000 and a fee of $3,000 for attending each Board of Directors meeting, $2,000 for attending each Audit Committee meeting, $1,000 for each Compensation Committee meeting, and $1,000 for each Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meeting. In addition, each director is reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred to attend Board of Directors or Board of Directors committee meetings. In addition, we pay: (i) Mr. Gay an additional $20,000 per year for assuming the responsibility for being Chairman of our Audit and Ethics Committees, (ii) Mr. Borneo an additional $10,000 per year for assuming the responsibility for being Chairman of our Compensation committee, (iii) Mr. Miller an additional $7,500 per year for being Chairman of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and (iv) Mr. Adelson an additional $20,000 per year for assuming the responsibility for being our lead director, pro-rated for his service from April 1, 2019 through March 23, 2020 when Mr. Ferguson took over the responsibilities.

Under our 2014 Plan, each non-employee director was granted an award of restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $130,000 upon their election to our Board of Directors. In addition, each non-employee director was awarded restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $65,000 for each full year of service on our Board of Directors.

Article Seven of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides, in part, that to the extent required by New York Business Corporation Law, or NYBCL, no director shall have any personal liability to us or our shareholders for damage for any breach of duty as such director, provided that each such director shall be liable under the following circumstances: (a) in the event that a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to such director establishes that his acts or omissions were in bad faith, involved intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law or that such director personally gained in fact a financial profit or other advantage to which such director was not legally entitled or that such director’s acts violated Section 719 of the NYBCL or (b) for any act or omission prior to the adoption of Article Seven of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

Article Nine of our Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that we shall indemnify any person, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of our Company or served any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan, or other enterprise in any capacity at our request, against judgments, fines, amounts paid in settlement and reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees incurred as a result of an action or proceeding, or any appeal therefrom, provided, however, that no indemnification shall be made to, or on behalf of, any director or officer if a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to such director or officer establishes that (a) his or her acts were committed in bad faith or were the result of active and deliberate dishonesty and, in either case, were material to the cause of action so adjudicated, or (b) he or she personally gained in fact a financial profit or other advantage to which he or she was not legally entitled.

We may purchase and maintain insurance for our own indemnification and for that of our directors and officers and other proper persons as described in Article Nine of our Amended and Restated Bylaws. We maintain and pay premiums for directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies.

We are incorporated under the laws of the State of New York and Sections 721-726 of Article 7 of the NYBCL provide for the indemnification and advancement of expenses to directors and officers. Section 721 of the NYBCL provides that indemnification and advancement of expenses provisions contained in the NYBCL shall not be deemed exclusive of any rights which a director or officer seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled, provided no indemnification may be made on behalf of any director or officer if a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to the director or officer establishes that his or her acts were committed in bad faith or were the result of active and deliberate dishonesty and were material to the cause of action so adjudicated, or that he or she personally gained in fact a financial profit or other advantage to which he or she was not legally entitled.

Section 722 of the NYBCL permits, in general, a New York corporation to indemnify any person made, or threatened to be made, a party to an action or proceeding by reason of the fact that he or she was a director or officer of that corporation, or served another entity in any capacity at the request of that corporation, against any judgment, fines, amounts paid in settlement and reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees actually and necessarily incurred as a result of such action or proceeding, or any appeal therein, if such person acted in good faith, for a purpose he or she reasonably believed to be in, or, in the case of service of another entity, not opposed to, the best interests of that corporation and, in criminal actions or proceedings, who in addition had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful. However, no indemnification may be made to, or on behalf of, any director or officer in a derivative suit in respect of (a) a threatened action or a pending action that is settled or otherwise disposed of or (b) any claim, issue or matter for which the person has been adjudged to be liable to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that a court in which the action was brought, or, if no action was brought, any court of competent jurisdiction, determines upon application that the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnify for that portion of settlement and expenses as the court deems proper.

Section 723 of the NYBCL permits a New York corporation to pay in advance of a final disposition of such action or proceeding the expenses incurred in defending such action or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay such amount as, and to the extent, required by statute. Section 724 of the NYBCL permits a court to award the indemnification required by Section 722.

Section 725 provides for repayment of such expenses when the recipient is ultimately found not to be entitled to indemnification. Section 726 provides that a corporation may obtain indemnification insurance indemnifying itself and its directors and officers.

The foregoing is only a summary of the described sections of the NYBCL and our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and Amended and Restated Bylaws and is qualified in its entirety by the reference to such sections and charter documents.

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors determines the compensation of our officers and directors. None of our executive officers currently serves on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other company of which any members of our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee is an executive officer.

The following table sets forth, as of July 13, 2020, certain information as to the common stock ownership of each of our named executive officers, directors, all executive officers and directors as a group and all persons known by us to be the beneficial owners of more than five percent of our common stock. The percentage of common stock beneficially owned is based on 19,018,546 shares of common stock outstanding as of July 13, 2020.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage of ownership held by that person, shares of common stock subject to options held by that person that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of July 13, 2020 are deemed outstanding, while these shares are not deemed outstanding for determining the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, the address of the shareholder is c/o Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. 2929 California Street, Torrance, CA 90503.