This information statement is being furnished to you, as a holder of common stock, par value $0.01 (“Common Stock”), of CCUR Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CCUR”, “we” or the “Company”), on or around April 2, 2021, to inform you of (i) the approval on December 21, 2020 of resolutions by our Board of Directors (the “Board”) proposing an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) to effect a reverse stock split of our Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”) and (ii) our receipt of written consents dated December 21, 2020 (the “Written Consents”), approving such amendment by stockholders holding 52.0% of the voting power of all of our stockholders entitled to vote (the “Consenting Stockholders”) on the matter as of December 21, 2020 (the “Record Date”). The resolutions adopted by the Board and the written consents of the stockholders give us the authority to file a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Amendment”). The Certificate of Amendment shall be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on or after April 22, 2021 (20 calendar days following the date this Information Statement is first mailed to our stockholders), and will become effective immediately thereafter (the “Effective Date”). As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, as described in more detail below, stockholders owning fewer than 3,000 shares of our Common Stock will be cashed out at a price of $2.86 per share, and the holdings of all other stockholders will remain unchanged.

Although the Reverse Stock Split has been approved by the requisite number of stockholders, the Board reserves the right, in its discretion, to abandon the Reverse Stock Split prior to the proposed Effective Date if it determines that abandoning the Reverse Stock Split is in the best interests of the Company.

The Reverse Stock Split is being undertaken as part of the Company’s plan to suspend its obligations to file periodic and current reports and other information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). As described further in this Information Statement, the Board has determined that the costs of being a public reporting company outweigh the benefits thereof. The actions described herein, including effecting the Reverse Stock Split, terminating the registration of our common stock under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act and suspending of our reporting obligations under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are collectively referred to herein as the “Transaction.” After giving effect to the Transaction, we will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act or other requirements applicable to a public company, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) and the listing standards of any national securities exchange.

WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY.

No action is required by you. The accompanying information statement is furnished only to inform our stockholders of record on the Record Date of the Reverse Stock Split taken by the Consenting Stockholders in accordance with Rule 14c-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Reverse Stock Split will become effective as soon as possible, but not sooner than 20 days following the date that the accompanying information statement is first mailed to our stockholders. The information statement is first mailed to you on or about April 2, 2021. The accompanying information statement shall serve as notice to our stockholders who did not consent to action of our stockholders taken without a meeting, pursuant to Section 228(e) of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

The date of this information statement is March 26, 2021.

This information statement is being furnished to the stockholders of CCUR Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CCUR”, “we” or the “Company”) in connection with our receipt of written consents dated December 21, 2020 (the “Written Consents”) by stockholders (the “Consenting Stockholders”) holding 52.0% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), to adopt and approve a 3,000-for-1 reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The following actions will be taken pursuant to the Written Consents:

The enclosed information statement is being furnished to inform you of the foregoing action. The actions will not become effective before the date which is 20 days after this information statement is first mailed to stockholders. The enclosed information statement is first being mailed on or about April 2, 2021 to stockholders of record on December 21, 2020. You are encouraged to read the enclosed information statement in its entirety for a description of the action taken by the Written Consent.

THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION, NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE FAIRNESS OR MERIT OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT NOR UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS INFORMATION STATEMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

NO PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS INFORMATION STATEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMPANY OR ANY OTHER PERSON.

The following questions and answers briefly address some commonly asked questions about the Reverse Stock Split that may not be addressed in the summary above. These questions and answers may not include all the information that is important to you. We urge you to read carefully this entire information statement, including the appendices hereto.

This information statement contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Because these forward-looking statements are being made in connection with an SEC Rule 13e-3 “going private” transaction, the safe harbor created by Section 21E of the Exchange Act does not apply to these statements. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding future events and our plans, goals and objectives. Such statements are generally accompanied by words such as “intend.” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” or similar terms. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from such statements, which reflect the Board’s and/or management’s opinions only as of the date hereof.

Although CCUR believes that the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and. Therefore, the results contemplated in such forward-looking statements might not be realized. The inclusion of such forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the future events, plans or expectations contemplated by the Company will be achieved. To the extent required by the federal securities laws. The Company has a responsibility to make full and prompt disclosure of material fact, whether favorable and unfavorable, regarding the Company’s financial condition and this responsibility may extend to situations where management knows or has reason to know that previously disclosed projections no longer have a reasonable basis. Readers should carefully review the risks set forth herein as well as other factors addressed in this report. Forward-looking statements made in this document or in any documents incorporated by reference or otherwise made in reference to this transaction are not protected under the safe harbors of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

The purpose of the Reverse Stock Split is to facilitate a “going private” transaction to terminate the Company’s registration and periodic reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, and continue future operations as a private company, thereby relieving us of the costs, administrative burdens and competitive disadvantages associated with operating as a public company. The Company intends to accomplish this purpose by reducing the number of holders of record of Common Stock to fewer than 300 by cashing out the fractional shares that result from the Reverse Stock Split. The Company estimates that the Reverse Stock Split will decrease the total number of common stockholders from approximately 3,731 to approximately 235.

Due to (a) the costs of maintaining its public company status, (b) the time spent by directors and officers related to being a public company, (c) the fact that the Company has not realized many of the benefits associated with being a public company, such as access to the public capital markets, ability to use stock to make acquisitions, enhanced stockholder value and business credibility, and (d) limited liquidity and the market price of the Company’s Common Stock, the Board considered whether it was in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the Company to remain a publicly traded entity. The following is a summary of the actions taken by the Board during this process.

During late 2019, the Board became dissatisfied with the fact that the Company had not been able to take advantage of its public company status in relations to operations and thus with the increasing costs of being a public company. The Company estimated the costs of being a public company during fiscal year 2019 to be approximately $1,000,000.

During the summer of 2020, the Board and Company management began undertaking informal discussions regarding the possibility of terminating the Company’s public company status. During these conversations, management advised the Board that the Company had costs of approximately $1,000,000 each year as a result of being a public company and also noted that the Company had not significantly realized the benefits associated with being a public company, including access to the public capital markets and stockholder liquidity.

During the fall of 2020, the President presented a verbal recommendation to the other board members that the subject of privatization be explored as a means of reducing both near-term and long-term overhead costs as well as reducing the Company’s exposure to corporate governance rules. The President recommended that the Board consider structuring the proposed transaction in such a way as to prevent any adverse effect to existing operations. The recommendation also pointed out that the Company was not in a position to take full advantage of its public company status, which rendered the cost of maintaining such status unwarranted.

Based on these discussions, during the Board meeting in December 2020, each member of the Board agreed that serious consideration should be given to the cost reductions associated with privatization.

In the fall of 2020, Company management held telephone discussions with representatives of Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP, the Company’s outside legal counsel. Various methods to accomplish a going private transaction were reviewed, including an examination of a cash out merger, a tender offer, a sale of the Company to, or merger of the Company with, another organization, a reverse stock split, and purchases of the Company’s common stock on the open market.

During these discussions, the following strategic alternatives in addition to the reverse stock split were considered:

During these discussions, the Board also considered the benefits and disadvantages of:

The Board also discussed in detail other aspects of the going private transaction, including the price to be paid to stockholders in lieu of fractional shares. In that regard, the Company noted that since being delisted from NASDAQ in 2018, its trading history was limited and its volume of trading low and, as a result, neither might accurately reflect the value of the Company’s Common Stock, which price was lower than the book value per share reflected in the Company’s public filings with the SEC. Based on these discussions, the Company hired ValueScope to prepare a report on the valuation of the Common Stock, to allow the Board to better determine the value of the Common Stock.

The Board also identified and undertook discussions of the disadvantages of the Reverse Stock Split, namely, the fact that stockholders of record owning fewer than 3,000 shares would not be able to participate in any future growth of the Company. The Board noted that this disadvantage is minimized by the fact that any stockholder who so chooses can remain a stockholder by purchasing a sufficient number of shares in order to increase the number of shares in such stockholder’s record account to at least 3,000. Another disadvantage discussed by the Board is the fact that stockholders who remain after the Reverse Stock Split will no longer have access to information concerning the Company’s operations and financial results that is currently available in its SEC filings.

On December 21, 2020, the Board received the initial report of ValueScope which stated a per share valuation of $3.06. On December 21, 2020, the Board discussed this report and concluded that a valuation of $3.06 per share would be fair to the stockholders who would receive fractional shares as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.

Based on these considerations, the Board determined that the results of a Reverse Stock Split are more predictable and automatic, and determined that the Reverse Stock Split is the most expeditious and economical way of reducing the number of holders of record to fewer than 300 and effecting the termination of its registration and periodic reporting obligations. The Board then unanimously approved by written consent a 3,000-for-1 Reverse Stock Split of the Company’s Common Stock on December 21, 2020.

In November and December 2020, as the Company and the Board continued to have discussions on a going private transaction through the Reverse Stock Split, management of the Company had informal discussions with the Consenting Stockholders, and the Company asked the Consenting Stockholders if this might be something they would support, in order to determine the feasibility and advisability, as the Company did not wish to devote Company time and resources to such actions unless there was significant shareholder interest. The Consenting Stockholders indicated that they would consider supporting a Reverse Stock Split, and asked that the Company provide them with all available information when they were ready to move forward, in order to fully evaluate whether they would provide consent. Other than engaging in discussions initiated by the Company, the Consenting Stockholders were not involved in the planning or structuring of the Reverse Stock Split.

On December 21, 2020, the Company provided a copy of the report of ValueScope to JDS1, who we were informed, shared, and discussed with other Consenting Stockholders. On that same day, the Consenting Stockholders, holding approximately 52.0% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, delivered their consent approving the Reverse Stock Split and other transactions contemplated thereby. The stockholder consent is sufficient under the DGCL to approve the Reverse Stock Split without the concurrence of any other stockholders. Therefore, no further action of the stockholders is necessary to approve the Reverse Stock Split. The Company has not required the approval of the Reverse Stock Split by the holders of a majority of the Company’s shares held by persons unaffiliated with the Company.

Subsequently, on January 12, 2021, the Company was due the return of $8,500,000 in aviation deposits. The Company had financed 12 transactions, each of which has utilized the services of Wright Brothers, based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, as the escrow agent. Prior to January 12, 2021, each aviation deposit the Company provided had been returned on time and without incident. Upon inquiry to Wright Brothers and following repeated unsuccessful attempts to contact it or its principal, Debbie Mercer-Erwin, the Company learned that on or about December 17, 2020, Ms. Mercer-Erwin had been arrested by law enforcement and that all assets of Wright Brothers had been frozen. In addition to the deposit funds mentioned above, we were also due the return of a further $5,500,000 in aviation deposits on January 25, 2021. After the announcement of this development on January 26, 2021, the Company's share price declined.

In consideration of the events surrounding the aviation deposits, the lack of information surrounding the investigations and status of the funds, and its implications for the Company's business, at a telephonic meeting of the Board of Directors on February 6, 2021, the Board of Directors determined to revisit the Reverse Stock Split. While it was the continuing sense of the members of the Board of Directors that the Reverse Stock Split remained

in the best interests of the Company, the Board of Directors deemed it appropriate to revisit the price per share to be paid for the shares that would be cashed out in the transaction. To assist the Board of Directors in its reconsideration of the terms of the reverse stock split, ValueScope was requested to prepare an updated valuation analysis of the Company that took account of the developments with the aviation deposits.

On February 6, 2021, based on an examination of all information currently available to the Company, it has determined that it is probable a loss has occurred related to its aviation deposits. Due to the limited information available and uncertainty related to the specific sources of recovery and their timing, the Company was unable to make the determination that a specific amount of recovery is probable. As a result, the Company’s Board of Directors determined on that date that the appropriate action is a full write-down of its aviation deposits. As of December 31, 2020, these aviation deposits had a carrying value of $13.8 million. On February 16, 2021, the Company filed its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2020, including the write-down of its aviation deposits.

On February 15, 2021, the Company received an updated valuation analysis from ValueScope, which stated that the updated fair value per share was $2.86. On February 22, 2021, the Board of Directors met telephonically to further discuss the Reverse Stock Split and the updated report from ValueScope. Management discussed the state of the Company's business, including the implications of the write-down of the aviation deposits. The Board of Directors reviewed the various factors and alternatives that the Board of Directors had previously considered in connection with the Reverse Stock Split, and that were summarized in the preliminary information statement materials that had been filed with the SEC. Taking account of these discussions, including the updated ValueScope analysis, and relying on its prior extended consideration of the merits of the Reverse Stock Split, the Board of Directors reconfirmed its decision to proceed with the transaction. The Board of Directors unanimously determined, however, that in light of the changed circumstances, it would be appropriate to reduce the cash-out price to $2.86 per share.

ValueScope’s updated analysis and opinion supersede the analysis and opinion previously delivered to the Board of Directors in all respects and such previous analysis and related opinion have been withdrawn and should accordingly no longer be relied upon in making any determinations, financial or otherwise, regarding the Company or any proposed transactions involving the stockholders of the Company.

On February 22, 2021, the Company provided a copy of the updated report of ValueScope to the Consenting Stockholders. The Company was orally advised that the Consenting Stockholders were okay with moving forward on the Reverse Stock Split and no one wished to withdraw their consent.

Prior to 2018, the Company was known as Concurrent Computer Corporation (“Concurrent”), and its business strategy was focused on providing software, hardware and professional services for the content delivery market, storage solutions market and the high-performance, real-time market. During 2017, the Company disposed of those operations for cash. The Company is now a holding company owning and seeking to own subsidiaries engaged in a variety of business operations. Currently, it has two operating segments: (i) Merchant cash advance operations and other financial services operations; and (ii) real estate operations.

As a result of the sale of the Company’s operations, the NASDAQ Stock Market determined that the Company no longer met the criteria for continued listing of its Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Market, and the stock was delisted from NASDAQ in March 2018 and began trading on the OTCQB. The Company believes that the vast majority of its stockholders are legacy stockholders, who invested in the Concurrent business strategy and operations, and for various reasons, including a lack of a liquid trading market since being delisted from NASDAQ, remain stockholders today. For example, in 2017, the Company’s Common Stock traded on average 33,000 shares per day on the NASDAQ Global Market, but only traded on average approximately 8,000 shares per day on the OTCQB during the first nine months of 2020, representing a 75% decrease in trading volume.

Another reason for the Reverse Stock Split is to qualify the Company for deregistration of its Common Stock under SEC Rules 12g-4(a)(1) and (b). Those rules allow a public company with a class of securities held by fewer than 300 persons to terminate its registration and reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, with respect to that class of securities. The Company believes it is its duty in fairness to all of its stockholders and an exercise of its good business judgment to accomplish the Reverse Stock Split as soon as possible.

The Reverse Stock Split will terminate the equity interests of approximately 3,496 of the Company’s holders of Common Stock who each own fewer than 3,000 shares of Common Stock and will reduce the equity interest of any record holder who beneficially holds a number of shares of Common Stock that is not evenly divisible by 3,000.

In addition, the Reverse Stock Split will terminate the equity interests of beneficial owners of fewer than 3,000 shares whose shares are held in “street name” by their broker or other record owner. The Reverse Stock Split is expected to relieve the Company of the administrative burdens and costs associated with filing reports and otherwise complying with the requirements of registration under the federal securities laws by deregistering the Company’s Common Stock.

Additionally, the Reverse Stock Split is expected to reduce the administrative burden and expense of maintaining many small stockholders’ accounts. A large number of stockholders own less than 3,000 shares, which is less, and in many cases substantially less, than $10,000 in value at current market prices. The Company believes that it is uneconomical for the Company to continue to maintain share positions of such a small size. These small positions will be cashed out as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, the Reverse Stock Split would provide small stockholders a beneficial mechanism to liquidate their equity interest at a fair price for their shares without having to pay brokerage commissions, particularly in light of the small value of the share ownership and limited trading liquidity available to holders of the Company’s Common Stock.

This transaction will help the Company control unnecessary expenses and to cut general and administrative costs by eliminating the expenses, time and effort related to the Company’s registration and periodic reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, and the related stockholder servicing expenses associated with being an SEC reporting company. Annual costs associated with the Company’s registration and periodic reporting obligations, including auditors’ fees, attorneys’ fees, insurance costs, transfer agent fees, printing, postage and other stockholder communications expenses, stock transfer fees and other miscellaneous fees associated with being a publicly held company and servicing stockholders amount to approximately $1,000,000. The overall executive time currently devoted to our public company reporting obligations could be devoted to other purposes such as business development efforts and performing due diligence on potential acquisitions. The Company, its affiliates and remaining stockholders are expected to benefit from the anticipated savings in regulatory and SEC compliance-related costs.

The Board believes that the Company and its stockholders currently derive no material benefit from continued registration under the federal securities laws. Throughout the Company’s time as a public company, the Company has explored potential alternatives to increase stockholder value and in some instances has implemented such measures. Generally, the Company has been unsuccessful in attracting investor interest in the Company’s new business operations, despite operating a publicly held company for several years since the disposal of the legacy assets. The Company has been unable to provide increased value to its stockholders as a public company.

In June 2020, there were changes made to the senior management and the Board. New management undertook a review of the Company’s costs and procedures. As a result of this review, management felt that the Company would benefit from a reduced cost structure and more efficient utilization of its resources. One of the biggest expenses for the Company, both in terms of time, resources and costs, is the annual audit of its financial statements for filing with its annual report on Form 10-K. With that in mind, management decided that if it was going to move forward with a plan to go private, it should be initiated before the end of 2020 (with the Company have a fiscal year ending June 30) in order to provide that it could be completed in time to not incur the costs and expenses of a public audit.

The tangible and intangible costs of being a public company are not justified because the Company has not been able to realize many of the benefits that publicly traded companies sometimes realize. The Board does not believe the Company is in a position to use its status as a public company to raise capital through sales of securities in a public offering or to otherwise access the public markets to raise equity capital. The Company’s Common Stock’s minimal public float and limited trading volume have limited the ability of its stockholders to sell their shares without also reducing our trading price. The lack of liquidity also limits the Company’s ability to use its stock as acquisition currency or to successfully attract and retain employees. During the 90 day period prior to December 21, 2020, the average daily trading volume of the Company’s Common Stock on the OTCQB was approximately 7,343 shares per day, which, using the closing price for shares of the Company’s Common Stock on December 18, 2020 would amount to sales of approximately $21,074 of shares of Common Stock per day. In addition, the Company is not aware of any analyst coverage of the Common Stock.

Continuing as a public company would provide certain benefits, namely a public market for the sale and exchange of shares, some stockholder liquidity, and readily accessible financial, business and management information about the Company. The reason for terminating these benefits is that they are expensive and of limited effect for small, public companies like the Company. Over the past 12 months, very little trading has taken place in the Company’s securities, affording stockholders little liquidity for their shares. The Company’s market capitalization is so small that it does not attract substantial investment activity or analyst interest. In addition, the Company’s stock trades at a price that is lower than the book value per share, which is unlike almost every other public company. This discount from book value prevents the Company from using its stock to make acquisitions, as the Company would need to issue substantially more shares of stock, causing increased dilution to existing stockholders, and large issuances of Common Stock could risk the loss or impairment of some or all of the Company’s NOLs. Consequently, the benefits that generally accompany status as a publicly traded company provide little practical benefit to the Company. As a result, the Board has determined that the costs of remaining a publicly traded entity outweigh the benefits for the Company.

The Company’s ownership structure is unwieldy. The Company is a small, public company by any measure, including gross assets, market value, gross revenues, employees, etc. Our stockholder base is quite large compared to our size. In addition, we have an inordinate number of stockholders owning a very small number of shares. For example 3,496 of our approximately 3,731 stockholders (approximately 94%) hold shares with an aggregate market value of under $10,000 using the closing price for shares of our common stock on December 18, 2020 of $2.87.

The Board, on behalf of the Company, and certain of the Company’s affiliates, JDS1, Igor Volshteyn, Matthew Gerritsen, David Nicol, Robert Pons and Steven G. Singer (such affiliates, collectively, the “Company Affiliates”) are each independently required, under Item 1014(a) of Regulation M-A (17 C.F.R. §229.1014), to determine whether it or he (as the case may be) reasonably believes that a going private transaction, such as the Reverse Stock Split, is fair or unfair to its unaffiliated stockholders. The Board, by unanimous approval on behalf of the Company, and each of the Company Affiliates, independently and in its capacity as affiliates of the Company, have made that determination and, for the reasons set forth below, have reached a decision that the Reverse Stock Split is fair to the unaffiliated stockholders.

The Board, on behalf of the Company, and the Company Affiliates have analyzed the Reverse Stock Split and its anticipated effects on its stockholders, and all of the members of the Board, and the Company Affiliates deemed the Reverse Stock Split and related termination of the Company’s registration and periodic reporting obligations to be substantively and procedurally fair to, and in the best interests of, both its affiliated and unaffiliated stockholders, whether they are cashed out or remain as stockholders following the Reverse Stock Split. In reaching this conclusion, the Board and the Company Affiliates considered, in no particular order and without preference, the following factors:

The Reverse Stock Split offers stockholders who hold fewer than 3,000 shares the opportunity to dispose of their holdings at a premium above current market prices and average historic market prices without brokerage commissions.

Our Board hired ValueScope, an independent evaluator, to provide a valuation of the Common Stock. This report recommended a per share price of $2.86. The Board and Company Affiliates weighed this valuation against other methods it used to value the Common Stock to determine the $2.86 per share of existing Common Stock to pay to stockholders who will have fractional shares as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. The valuation methods that the Board and Company Affiliates considered included:

After considering these valuation methods, the Board and Company Affiliates concluded to rely on the report of ValueScope, the independent evaluator, and chose the valuation provided as it concluded that this best reflected the per share value based on the other valuation methods considered by the Board.

The cash consideration of $2.86 per share to be paid for fractional shares is equal to the volume weighted average price for the two week trading period after the Company announced the issues with its aviation deposits. As such, the Board and Company Affiliates consider it to be fair to the Company’s stockholders. The price per share is made even fairer by the fact that the Company is committed to paying any transaction fees that are imposed on our stockholders by a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, such as brokerage commissions and service charges, as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.

The Company has carefully considered all the facts and circumstances surrounding the loss of the aviation deposits and worked closely with outside counsel to advise it as to avenues of recovery and potential litigation strategies. Due to the unique facts of this case, the Company believes it is unlikely that insurance (either its own policy or that of Wright Brothers) will provide coverage for the losses. The Company had previously believed insurance coverage may be available under the Wright Brother’s crime policy, issued by Lloyds, or its own crime policy issued by Argo. At present, counsel for Lloyds has advised that CCUR is not recognized as an Additional Insured under the Wright Brother’s policy, and even if it were, Lloyds is likely to claim that the policy is void ab initio due to the criminal activities of the principal. Counsel has reviewed CCUR’s crime policy and is currently unable to determine whether it provides coverage due to the specific facts around this loss. If coverage would apply, we would first need to exhaust all other legal remedies, which could take a significant amount of time and money, making any potential recovery uncertain and unlikely.

The Company believes litigation may have some potential to provide a recovery, but at this time it is impossible to predict, with any amount of certainty, the amounts to be recovered or the time to recover those funds. This is further complicated in that we have been advised that virtually all funds are unaccounted for and a material amount is suspected to have been transferred offshore and appears to no longer be in the form of cash or liquid assets. The Company weighed all these facts when recently considering the proper treatment of the aviation deposits and concluded that a full write-down was most appropriate.

Consistent with the Company’s goal to pursue appropriate rights and remedies to recover the lost aviation deposits, on March 1, 2021, it filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against South Aviation, Inc., its counterparty in the aviation deposits and Frederica A. Machado, the principal of South Aviation. The Company also simultaneously filed an Emergency Motion for the Immediate Appointment of a Receiver. The Company believes such actions will be the most effective way to pursue a recovery of funds, but has been advised that this is most likely to result in years of complex litigation with any recovery being highly uncertain.

For more details surrounding the Ponzi scheme that contributed to the Company’s losses, the Third Superseding Indictment filed February 24, 2021 by the United States of America and unsealed a few days later, can be found at the following link. https://interactive.wfaa.com/pdfs/Onalaskindictment.pdf.

As a result, the Company and Company Affiliates determined that any potential for recovery was too speculative, in terms of possibility of success, the amount that might be received, even if successful, as well as the timing of any recovery, when considering the fairness price per share.

The Reverse Stock Split ratio is fair and equitable to unaffiliated stockholders. The purpose of the Reverse Stock Split is to reduce the number of record holders to fewer than 300 so that the Company can file to terminate its registration and periodic reporting obligations and continue future operations as a private company. The split ratio is a result of calculations that were intended to determine how many shares needed to be eliminated to reduce the number of record holders to fewer than 300 for purposes of terminating public reporting requirements. The Board and Company Affiliates feel the current ratio of 1-for-3,000 is fair because it was calculated without bias towards any one group of stockholders. The ratio will be applied equally to all shares of Company’s Common Stock and is not designed to increase any one person’s position, ownership or financial gain as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.

The Reverse Stock Split provides the Company’s stockholders with liquidity. The average daily trading volume for the Company’s Common Stock over the last three months was less than one-tenth of a percent (0.1%) of its outstanding stock. The Reverse Stock Split will provide stockholders who hold fewer than 3,000 shares on the Effective Date the opportunity to liquidate their investment in the Company. Under normal circumstances and based on the average trading price per share of $2.87 as of December 18, 2020, a trading day shortly before the public announcement of the proposed Reverse Stock Split, stockholders with fewer than 3,000 shares wanting to sell their Common Stock would likely incur transaction fees that are disproportionately high relative to the market value of their holding of the Company’s Common Stock. The Reverse Stock Split will eliminate this problem for those stockholders because the Company will pay any transaction fees that are imposed on its stockholders by a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, such as brokerage commissions and service charge, as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.

The Reverse Stock Split includes the ability to remain a stockholder of the Company. Another factor considered by the Board and Company Affiliates in determining the procedural fairness of the transaction to unaffiliated stockholders is that current holders of fewer than 3,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock may elect to remain stockholders of the Company by acquiring sufficient shares so that they hold at least 3,000 shares in their account immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split.

Conversely, stockholders who desire to liquidate their shares of the Company’s Common Stock for the cash consideration offered may reduce their holdings to less than 3,000 shares prior to the Reverse Stock Split. The Board considers the structure of the Reverse Stock Split to be fair to all stockholders because it allows them to control the decision of whether to remain a stockholder of the Company following the Reverse Stock Split or to receive the cash consideration offered in connection with the Reverse Stock Split.

No material change in percentage ownership of the affiliated stockholders. Because the Company estimates that approximately 763,309 out of 8,972,524 shares of the Company’s Common Stock will be cancelled as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the percentage ownership of stockholders that remain after the Reverse Stock Split will change only slightly from their ownership prior to the Reverse Stock Split.

For example, the Company’s officers and directors, JDS1 and Dimensional currently own, in the aggregate, approximately 48.5% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock and will continue to own approximately 53.0% following completion of the Reverse Stock Split. The fact that the transaction has been structured in a manner that maintains a substantially similar percentage ownership of the stockholders, whether affiliated or unaffiliated, who remain after the Reverse Stock Split, supports the fairness of the transaction to Company stockholders.

No unusual conditions to the Reverse Stock Split. The Board and Company Affiliates also considered the likelihood that the Reverse Stock Split would be implemented. In this regard, both the Board and Company Affiliates took into consideration that there are no unusual requirements or conditions to the Reverse Stock Split, and the fact that the Company has the financial resources to implement the Reverse Stock Split expeditiously. The Reverse Stock Split is not a condition precedent to any binding agreement of the Company.

Cessation of public sale opportunities. Following the Reverse Stock Split, the Company will apply for the termination of its registration and periodic reporting obligations with the SEC. Once the Company terminates its registration and periodic reporting obligations, the Company’s Common Stock will no longer be eligible to be quoted on the OTCQB. As a result, stockholders may no longer have the alternative of selling their shares of Common Stock on the public market, and there may be no effective trading market for the Company’s Common Stock. As a result, any stockholder desiring to sell his or her shares may have a difficult time finding a buyer. Such illiquidity may reduce the price a buyer is willing to pay for such shares. The Company anticipates that the public market for shares of the Company’s Common Stock will be substantially reduced or eliminated altogether. Additionally, the Company does not have any present intention or plans to sell the Company or enter into any other transaction that would provide liquidity for existing shares.

However, the current public market for the Company’s Common Stock is highly illiquid. As a practical matter, there currently exists very little liquidity for the Company’s Common Stock; therefore, the Board and Company Affiliates believe any further losses of liquidity will have little effect on unaffiliated stockholders and will be outweighed by the benefits of terminating its registration and periodic reporting obligations. In addition, because the effect of further losses of liquidity due to ineligibility for quotation on the OTCQB will have the same impact on all Company stockholders, whether affiliated or unaffiliated, the Board and Company Affiliates do not believe that this factor makes the transaction unfair to unaffiliated stockholders.

Cessation of publicly available information. Stockholders remaining in the Company following the Reverse Stock Split will no longer have available all of the information regarding the Company that is currently available in the Company’s filings with the SEC. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split and resulting termination of the Company’s registration and periodic reporting obligations, it will no longer prepare or file annual or quarterly reports with the SEC. As a result, Company stockholders will no longer be provided, among other things:

This information that is currently available to the general public and investors through the Company’s SEC filings will not be publicly available after the Company terminates the registration of its securities and its registration and periodic reporting obligations. The elimination of these reporting requirements will result in the loss of financial transparency for unaffiliated stockholders that remain stockholders in the Company after the Reverse Stock Split.

The Board and Company Affiliates do not believe this factor makes the transaction unfair to unaffiliated stockholders because any detriment to unaffiliated stockholders that may result from the termination of the registration of its securities and its periodic filings will be offset by the anticipated cost-saving benefits and competitive advantages to the Company of no longer publicly filing such reports.

In addition, Company stockholders who have restricted securities will be unable to resell their shares of the Company’s Common Stock under the exemptions provided by SEC Rule 144, unless and until (a) the Company

resumes filing the information required under that rule with the SEC or (b) such stockholders are eligible to sell their shares pursuant to another exemption under the securities laws. Given the current and historically low trading volume in the Company’s Common Stock, neither the Board nor Company Affiliates believe that the unavailability of the Rule 144 exemptions is a factor that makes the transaction unfair to unaffiliated stockholders.

Inability to participate in any future increase in the value of the Company’s Common Stock. Stockholders who are cashed out as a result of the Reverse Stock Split will have no further interest in the Company with respect to their cashed out shares, and thus will not have the opportunity to participate in the potential upside of any increase in the value of such shares. This includes any recovery by the Company of its aviation deposits that it wrote-down in full in February 2021. The Board and Company Affiliates determined that this factor does not make the transaction unfair to unaffiliated stockholders because those unaffiliated stockholders who desire to hold shares of the Company’s Common Stock after the Reverse Stock Split can do so by acquiring sufficient shares so that they hold at least 3,000 shares in their account immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split.

The price per share is less than net book value. As of December 31, 2020, the net book value per share (fully diluted) of our outstanding common stock was $6.39, and our net tangible book value per share (fully diluted) was $6.15. These net and net tangible book values (fully diluted) are based on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020. The Company’s net and net tangible book values (fully diluted) have remained higher than the market price for share for a significant period of time; since at least January 1, 2018, when the Company was still listed on NASDAQ. This disparity between net and net tangible book values (fully diluted), on one hand, and market price, on the other, has not resulted in an increase in demand for our stock, as sophisticated investors often look for opportunities to acquire shares of companies that may be undervalued. In addition, because any stockholder that believes that the net and net tangible book values (fully diluted) represent a buying opportunity may elect to remain stockholders of the Company by acquiring sufficient shares so that they hold at least 3,000 shares in their account immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split, the Board and Company Affiliates do not believe that this factor makes the transaction unfair to unaffiliated stockholders.

The Reverse Stock Split has not been structured to require the separate approval of stockholders unaffiliated with the Company. Among the factors weighing against the procedural fairness of the Reverse Stock Split is the fact that the Board did not establish an independent or special committee to represent the interests of its unaffiliated stockholders. Company board members and JDS1 consented to the Reverse Stock Split as affiliated stockholders and the holders of a near-majority of the voting power of the Company. In addition, the Board has not and does not intend to retain an unaffiliated representative to act solely on behalf of unaffiliated security holders for purposes of negotiation of the terms of the Reverse Stock Split or preparing a report concerning the fairness of the Reverse Stock Split.

The Board did not establish an independent or special committee or other unaffiliated representative to act on behalf of the interests of the unaffiliated stockholders for several reasons. First and foremost, the Reverse Stock Split will be applied equally to all shares of the Company, whether held by affiliated or unaffiliated stockholders. Unlike a third party tender offer or a repurchase of shares by the Company, there is no price to negotiate on behalf of the unaffiliated stockholders. In the case of the Reverse Stock Split, the Board is tasked with determining a fair price to offer all stockholders. Therefore, the interests of the unaffiliated and affiliated stockholders are the same. Equally, all of the Board members are independent, and collectively own, in the aggregate, less than two percent (2%) of the issued and outstanding Common Stock. As such, the Board members are similarly situated as the unaffiliated stockholders. Additionally, the Board believes its long-standing familiarity with the Company, its financial condition, and its prospects make the time and expense of a special committee or independent representative unwarranted. Given the experience and composition of the Board, the Company did not believe it was necessary to appoint a special committee to evaluate the fairness of the terms of the Reverse Stock Split or the value of the Company’s Common Stock.

The Reverse Stock Split has not been structured so as to require the approval of at least a majority of the Company’s unaffiliated stockholders. The Board considered it a risk and potentially negative factor to the procedural fairness of the Reverse Stock Split that the approval of the Reverse Stock Split by a majority of the unaffiliated stockholders is not being sought. This risk is mitigated by the likelihood that a quorum of such unaffiliated stockholders would not be obtained and procedural factors favoring the Reverse Stock Split, such as the fact that stockholders have the option to remain stockholders of the Company if they purchase sufficient shares to bring their holdings to at least 3,000 shares immediately prior to the Effective Date.

The Board has unanimously approved the Reverse Stock Split and declared it advisable, in the best interests of, and substantively and procedurally fair to, its unaffiliated stockholders, whether they are cashed out or remain as stockholders of the Company. In reaching these conclusions, the Board considered, among other things, the following factors relating to the fairness of the Reverse Stock Split:

Notwithstanding the lack of additional procedural safeguards, such as the consent of a majority of the Company’s unaffiliated stockholders, the Board and Company Affiliates all believe they have acted in the best interest of both the affiliated and unaffiliated stockholders of the Company, whether they are to be cashed out or remain as stockholders of the Company, and that the fairness determination and approval of the transaction has been procedurally fair.

In view of the foregoing, the Board and Company Affiliates believe that sufficient procedural safeguards exist to ensure the fairness of the Reverse Stock Split and that the positive factors outweighed the negative factors, such that the Reverse Stock Split is substantively and procedurally fair to the unaffiliated stockholders of the Company.

Unlike stockholders who own less than 3,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock on the Effective Date, the directors, executive officers and affiliates listed above will have the opportunity to participate in the potential upside of any increase in the value of the Company’s Common Stock after the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, the Company expects its directors, executive officers and affiliates to retain their respective current positions as directors or executive officers of the Company following the Reverse Stock Split.

The Company will not purchase any Common Stock from any director, executive officer or affiliate of the Company in connection with the Reverse Stock Split other than any fractional shares that such person may hold after the Reverse Stock Split. Each of the Company’s directors and executive officers will receive the same cash consideration as its unaffiliated stockholders for fractional shares of Common Stock to which they would be entitled as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.

The Board obtained a report from ValueScope in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. ValueScope decided what would be a fair per share consideration to be received by holders of Common Stock who would otherwise hold fractional shares immediately following the Reverse Stock Split rather than providing a fairness opinion on a per share amount chosen by management.

After a review of suitable and commonly used methodologies to calculate a company’s value, ValueScope utilized the following methods to arrive at the valuation: $2.86.

We entered into an engagement letter with ValueScope in December 2020, which was amended in February 2021, relating to their services in connection with the report to be issued. No limitations were imposed by the Company on the scope of the report.

The Company’s management had solicited quotations for valuation services from two financial services firms and chose ValueScope based on their reputation, the cost of such services and the time given to provide the valuation report. ValueScope has over 30 years’ experience providing financial services and include valuation services among their core services.

In return for the report, we agreed to pay ValueScope a fee of $25,000, of which $15,000 was payable upon entry into the engagement letter. We also agreed to reimburse ValueScope for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with its engagement and to indemnify it against liabilities relating to or arising out of its engagement. The issuance of the report by ValueScope was not contingent on any factors (other than payment and the provision of the information required to complete the report), and the payment by us to ValueScope was not contingent on any factors, including a valuation at or above a set per share price. Other than the provision of the report by ValueScope to us, none of the Company, its directors and officers and its affiliate shareholders, on the one hand, and ValueScope or any of its affiliates or unaffiliated representatives that are known to the Company have had any relationship within the past two years and no such relationship is currently contemplated.

In the production of the report, ValueScope took the following actions and observed the following procedures:

The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed by ValueScope in connection with its report. The preparation of a fairness report involves complex considerations and various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analyses and the application of these methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, such a report is not readily susceptible to summary description. Each of the analyses conducted by ValueScope was carried out in order to provide a different perspective on the Reverse Stock Split and to add to the total mix of information available. ValueScope did not form a conclusion as to whether any individual analysis, considered in isolation, supported or failed to support an opinion as to the fairness of the per share price to be paid to holders of the Common Stock who will hold fractional shares immediately following the Reverse Stock Split. Rather, in reaching its conclusion, ValueScope relied upon the results of the analyses taken as a whole and also on application of ValueScope’s own experience and judgment. The analyses performed by ValueScope are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses.

The full text of the opinion of ValueScope, which sets forth assumptions made, matters considered, procedures followed and the qualifications and limitations on the scope of the review undertaken by ValueScope in rendering its opinion, is attached as Annex A to this Information Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. The full analysis prepared by ValueScope in support of the opinion will be made available for inspection and copying at the principal executive offices of the Company during its regular business hours by any interested equity security holder of the Company or representative who has been so designated in writing. Alternatively, a copy of the analysis will be transmitted by the Company to any interested equity security holder of the Company or representative who has been so designated in writing upon written request and at the expense of the requesting security holder. ValueScope’s opinion is for the use of the Board and addresses the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Reverse Stock Split to holders of shares of the Company's Common Stock, including those stockholders who will receive cash payments for their pre-split shares. The opinion does not address, in any manner, the relative merits of the Reverse Stock Split as compared to any other business strategies that might exist for the Company or the effects of any other transaction in which the Company might engage. Holders of shares of Common Stock are urged to, and should, read the opinion in its entirety.

ValueScope analyzed the Company’s trading history and utilized the market and asset approaches in determining a price per share on a minority, marketable basis. The COVID-19 global pandemic resulted in disruption to the financial markets and businesses. On January 26, 2021, the Company filed a Form 8-K disclosing the potential loss of $14 million of aircraft deposits. The Company utilized Wright Brothers Aircraft Title, Inc. (“WBAT”) since August 2018 as the escrow agent for 12 prior due diligence transactions involving fully refundable aircraft deposits. The Company was due a return of $8.5 million deposit from WBAT on January 12, 2021. After multiple unsuccessful attempts to contact WBAT and its principal Debbie Mercer-Erwin, the Company learned that Ms. Mercer-Erwin was arrested by law enforcement on or around December 17, 2020 and all assets of WBAT were frozen. On February 10, 2021, the Company issued an 8-K to disclose that its Board of Directors determined the appropriate action related to the WBAT issue was a write down of $13.8 million of aviation deposits.

ValueScope evaluated the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Company’s stock over multiple time periods through February 12^th. ValueScope selected the VWAP of $2.86 from January 27, 2021, date of the first disclosure of the WBAT issue, to February 12, 2021. The concluded fair market value price of $2.86 implies a price to book ratio of 0.46x. Below is the stock price analyses presented by ValueScope, with the row bolded for the selected observation.

Financial lending institutions often trade at prices below book value due to difficulty and uncertainty of evaluating their risk profile. ValueScope examined the price to book ratios of LM Funding America, Inc., IOU Financial Inc. and TruFin plc, publicly traded companies operating in the industry with similar revenues. During the period June 30, 2020 to February 12, 2021, each of these companies reported a price to book ratio under 0.35x.

ValueScope was unable to determine a price for the Company’s stock using the income approach. The Company has reported an operating loss of $1.7 million to $9.3 million during the last five fiscal years. The Company reported

an operating loss of $3.8 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020. The Company has reported positive net income due solely to investments, interest income, and tax credits. Per discussions with the Company’s management, the Company informed ValueScope that it ultimately plans to convert its marketable investments into capital for a new business venture. However, the timing and nature of such business is uncertain.

As part of ValueScope’s analysis, it performed a modified net asset value approach as an indication of value. The Company reported $64,889,000 of total assets as of December 31, 2020. Given the current operating losses and uncertain business model, it is reasonable the current intangible assets and goodwill are the balance sheet are worthless. Total assets net of current intangibles, would be adjusted to $62,732,000. The Company has liabilities of $8,629,000 and a minority interest of $1,179,000. ValueScope also estimated the potential operating drag of $5 million during the transition period. This estimate is based on a review of the Company’s historical operating losses and discussions with Company management. Company management represented that assets will be utilized in the new business venture as a private company. As a result, it is appropriate to consider discounts for lack of control and marketability. Typically, ValueScope sees discounts for lack of control in the 10-25% range and discounts for lack of marketability in the 25-45% range. Businesses with limited financials, historical operating losses, and uncertain prospects typically fall on the upper end of the range. Therefore, assumed a combined 45% to 50% discount in the calculation, with a midpoint of 47.5%. ValueScope calculated an adjusted net asset value (equity) of $25,160,000, which would be equivalent to $2.85 per share based on 8,839,344 shares outstanding.

Based on the foregoing valuation methodologies and other financial analysis performed, ValueScope determined, in its report, that consideration of $2.86 per share, pre-split, paid to fractional shareholders pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split would be fair, from a financial point of view.

When the Reverse Stock Split is effected, stockholders holding fewer than 3,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock in a single account immediately prior to the Effective Date will not receive a fractional share of new Common Stock as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, but instead will receive cash in lieu of the fractional share on the basis of $2.86 per share of existing Common Stock that they own on the Effective Date. The amount of cash each holder of fractional Common Stock will receive will be calculated by multiplying the number of shares of existing Common Stock that the stockholder owns on the Effective Date by $2.86.

The Company intends to pay any transaction fees that are imposed on these stockholders by a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee. Given that these stockholders will not have to pay any service charges or brokerage commissions in connection with the cashing out of their shares as a result of the Reverse Stock Split and given the historical illiquidity of the Company’s Common Stock, the Company believes the structure of the Reverse Stock Split to be a benefit to these stockholders. Among the potential detriments of the Reverse Stock Split is the fact that after the Reverse Stock Split, these stockholders will have no further ownership interest in the Company and will no longer be entitled to vote as a stockholder or share in the Company’s future assets, earnings, or profits. These stockholders’ only right will be to receive cash for their shares of Common Stock.

All amounts owed to these stockholders as a result of the Reverse Stock Split will be subject to applicable federal and state income taxes. Additional details regarding the federal tax consequences are described later in this information statement under the heading “Certain Material Federal Income Tax Consequences.”

As soon as practical after the consummation of the Reverse Stock Split, the Company or its transfer agent will mail a Letter of Transmittal to each stockholder. The Letter of Transmittal will contain instructions for the surrender of your stock certificate or certificates to the Exchange Agent in exchange for the payment of the cash consideration to be received for fractional shares of new Common Stock. No cash payment will be made to any stockholder until the stockholder has surrendered his or her outstanding certificates, together with the Letter of Transmittal, to the Exchange Agent. For more detailed information, see the section entitled “Stock Certificates.”

When the Reverse Stock Split is effected, stockholders who hold 3,000 or more shares of the Company’s Common Stock in a single account immediately prior to the Effective Date will:

While the remaining stockholders continue as stockholders of the Company and will have the opportunity to share in the future successes of the Company, if any, among the detriments of the Reverse Stock Split to the remaining stockholders is the fact that they will not have the option to liquidate their holdings like the stockholders who hold fewer than 3,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock prior to the Reverse Stock Split. Further, once the Company is private, it will be even more difficult to value, and therefore, sell their shares of Common Stock if they should so desire.

Affiliated stockholders of the Company include directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock. The affiliated stockholders will participate in the Reverse Stock Split on the same terms as the unaffiliated stockholders. All of the Company’s affiliated stockholders, except Matthew Gerritsen and Jonathan Tegge, own more than 3,000 shares each. Therefore, they will all continue to be stockholders of the Company following the Reverse Stock Split, and as such can expect the same benefits and detriments described above in the “Effects of the Reverse Stock Split on Unaffiliated Stockholders Who Hold 3,000 or More Shares of The Company’s Common Stock in a Single Account” section. They will have the opportunity to share in the future successes of the Company, if any, but they will also not have the option to liquidate their holdings and future valuations and sales of their stock will be more difficult given the Company’s private status following the Reverse Stock Split.

Affiliated stockholders will beneficially own approximately 1,450 post-reverse split shares of Common Stock, or approximately 53.0% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock after the Reverse Stock Split, as compared to approximately 48.5% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock prior to the Reverse Stock Split. As with all other remaining stockholders of the Company, the percentage ownership of the total outstanding shares held by its affiliated stockholders after the Reverse Stock Split may increase slightly due to the cancellation of the cashed out shares. The amounts set forth in the section entitled “Special Factors - Interests of the Company’s Directors, Executive Officers and Affiliates in the Reverse Stock Split” illustrate the effect of the Reverse Stock Split on the Company’s affiliated stockholders.

The Reverse Stock Split is expected to reduce the number of the Company’s stockholders and the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock. The Company’s certificate of incorporation, as amended, currently authorizes the issuance of 14,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which 64.1% are currently issued and outstanding. Upon the filing of the certificate of amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation with the Delaware Secretary of State, the Company’s authorized shares of Common Stock will remain at 14,000,000, at which time approximately 0.2% will be issued and outstanding. This will significantly increase the amount of shares that the Company could issue and its ability to dilute your percentage ownership of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares.

The Company’s Common Stock is currently registered under the Exchange Act, and consequently the Company is subject to its registration and periodic reporting obligations. The Company believes the Reverse Stock Split will reduce the number of beneficial holders of the Company’s Common Stock from approximately 3,731 to approximately 235. The Reverse Stock Split will allow the Company to file to terminate its registration and periodic reporting obligations and continue future operations as a private company.

The Company believes that following the completion of the Reverse Stock Split and the subsequent termination of its registration and periodic reporting obligations, the market for shares of the Company’s Common Stock will be substantially reduced or possibly eliminated. The Company’s Common Stock is currently traded on the OTCQB, and last sales prices are reported on the OTCQB, which is a regulated quotation service that displays real time quotes, last sales prices and volume information in over-the-counter equity securities. If the Company terminates its registration and periodic reporting obligations, its Common Stock will cease to be eligible to be quoted on the OTCQB and this source of liquidity will no longer be available to stockholders.

The Company is undertaking the Reverse Stock Split at this time to, among other things, eliminate substantial costs, time and effort related to the Company’s registration and periodic reporting obligations under the Exchange Act and the related stockholder servicing expenses associated with being an SEC reporting company. Annual costs associated with the Company’s registration and periodic reporting obligations, including auditors’ fees, attorneys’ fees, payroll expenses, insurance costs, transfer agent fees, printing, postage and other stockholder communications expenses, stock transfer fees and other miscellaneous fees associated with being a publicly held company and servicing stockholders amount to approximately $1,000,000, and the Company expects that it, its affiliates and remaining stockholders will benefit from the anticipated savings in regulatory and SEC compliance-related costs. The following table sets forth the estimated annual cost savings to be achieved as a result of the termination of the Company’s registration and reporting obligations:

Based on the aggregate number of stockholders of the Company’s Common Stock, and the number of stockholders of record owning 3,000 or more shares of the Company’s Common Stock as of the record date for notice of the action by written consent of its stockholders, the Company estimates that payments of cash in lieu of the issuance of fractional shares to unaffiliated stockholders will total approximately $3.2 million in the aggregate. No stockholder with a single account is expected to receive more than $8,577. However, more stockholders than anticipated may reduce their holdings of the Company’s Common Stock in the accounts to below 3,000 shares so that they can be cashed out, which would increase the costs associated with the Reverse Stock Split.

Following the completion of the Reverse Stock Split, the Company expects its operations will be conducted substantially as they are currently being conducted. As the Company has previously disclosed, following the divestiture of its legacy operating businesses in calendar year 2017, the Company has undertaken to evaluate strategic acquisitions of additional businesses or operating assets, either as part of an expansion of its current operating segments or establishment of a new operating segment, in an effort to reinvest the proceeds from the prior business dispositions and maximize use of other assets such as its NOL carryforwards. The Company continues to look for businesses and opportunities that have positive cash flow and experienced management teams. The Company seeks to identify fairly- or under-valued businesses or assets from a variety of sources. The Company’s Asset Management Committee, among other activities, continues the work of the former investment committee by providing oversight of the Company’s acquisition process, and its senior management spends a significant portion of its time evaluating potential acquisition and strategic opportunities. In addition, the Asset Manager provides consulting services and advice to the Board of Directors and the Company’s management regarding, among other things, its acquisition strategy. The Asset Manager also invests some of the excess capital resources of the Company in marketable debt, and equity securities to preserve resources needed to acquire operating assets and protect against inflation and similar risks.

Other than the Reverse Stock Split and the termination of its registration and periodic reporting obligations, the Company has no present plans or proposals that relate to or would result in an extraordinary corporate transaction

involving the Company’s corporate structure, business or management, such as a merger, reorganization, liquidation, relocation of any operations or sale or transfer of a material amount of assets. However, the Company will continue to evaluate its business and operations after the Reverse Stock Split, and may develop new plans and proposals in the future.

The rights of holders of the Company’s Common Stock as set out in its Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and Bylaws and under the DGCL will not change as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. The Company has no current plans to issue Common Stock other than pursuant to existing stock plans, but the Company reserve the right to do so at any time and from time to time at such prices and on such terms as the Board determines to be in the Company’s best interests and the best interests of its stockholders. The Company’s Common Stock carries no preemptive or preferential rights to purchase any Company stock that it may issue in the future, and neither its existing certificate of incorporation nor its bylaws currently contain any provisions that have a material anti-takeover effect. Persons who continue as stockholders following implementation of the Reverse Stock Split will not have any preemptive or other preferential rights to purchase any Common Stock that the Company may issue in the future, unless such rights are specifically granted to the stockholders. Other than as described in this information statement, the Company has no current agreements to effect any extraordinary corporate transaction such as a merger, reorganization or liquidation, to sell or transfer any material amount of its assets, to change the Board or management, to change materially its capitalization, or otherwise to effect any material change in its corporate structure of business. The Board will take such action, as it deems necessary or appropriate to make equitable adjustments to any outstanding stock options or other rights to acquire the Company’s Common Stock.

The Board retains the right to abandon the Reverse Stock Split, even if it determines prior to the Effective Date that the Reverse Stock Split is not then in the Company’s best interests or the best interests of its stockholders. Among the circumstances that might cause the Board to abandon the Reverse Stock Split is a significant risk of the Reverse Stock Split failing to achieve the overall goal of reducing the number of record holders to fewer than 300, or where the expense of cashing out the stockholders with fewer than 3,000 shares becomes so high that the transaction become financially prohibitive. If the reverse stock split is not implemented, then we will be unable to terminate our registration and periodic reporting obligations until we have fewer than 300 holders of record of our common stock.

The following is a general discussion of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split to U.S. holders (defined below) of our stock. This discussion is for general information purposes only, is not intended as tax advice to any person or entity. All stockholders are urged to consult with their own tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split in light of their particular situation. This discussion assumes that each of the pre-split shares were, and the post-split shares will be, held as “capital assets,” as defined in Section 1221 of the Code.

This discussion does not address the tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split arising pursuant to the unearned income Medicare contribution tax, the laws of any state, local, or non-U.S. jurisdiction, any U.S. federal estate or gift tax consequences, or any U.S. federal tax consequences other than the material federal income tax consequences specifically addressed below. This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and current Treasury Regulations, administrative rulings and court decisions, all of which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis, and any such change could affect the continuing validity of, and the conclusions reached in, this discussion. This discussion does not address the tax consequences to stockholders who are subject to special tax rules, such as banks, insurance companies, regulated investment companies, financial institutions, personal holding companies, partnerships (or entities treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes), stockholders who are not U.S. holders (as defined herein), U.S. holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, stockholders who hold their shares as “qualified small business stock” or “Section 1244” stock, broker-dealers (or other dealers in securities), stockholders who hold their stock as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction, or other integrated investment, holders that received their stock pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, retirement plans, tax-exempt entities, or persons subject to the alternative minimum tax.

If an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes owns shares, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in such partnership generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships that are owners of shares, and partners in such partnerships, should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state, and local tax, non-U.S. tax, and non-income tax consequences to them of the Reverse Stock Split.

We have not sought any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), nor have we sought an opinion from legal counsel with respect to the statements made and conclusions reached throughout this general discussion. There can be no assurance that the IRS would agree with the statements and conclusions set forth throughout this discussion, nor is there any assurance that such statements and conclusions will be sustained by a court if challenged by the IRS.

BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF OUR SHARES ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES APPLICABLE TO THEM RELATING TO THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY OF U.S. FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL TAX LAWS, OR NON-U.S. OR NON-INCOME TAX LAWS, ANY CHANGES IN APPLICABLE TAX LAWS, AND ANY PENDING OR PROPOSED LEGISLATION OR REGULATIONS.

THE DISCUSSION BELOW IS NOT INTENDED TO BE, AND CANNOT BE USED BY ANY PERSON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES. THE DISCUSSION BELOW WAS WRITTEN TO SUPPORT THE PROMOTION AND MARKETING OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AND PROXY SOLICITATION. PLEASE CONSULT YOUR OWN TAX ADVISER IN ORDER TO FULLY UNDERSTAND THE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AND PROXY SOLICITATION IN LIGHT OF YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.

As used herein, the term “U.S. holder” means a holder that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

The Reverse Stock Split is generally expected to be treated as a form of reorganization defined in Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Code as a recapitalization. A U.S. holder that does not receive any cash in the Reverse Stock Split generally should not recognize any gain or loss with respect to the Reverse Stock Split for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and generally should have the same aggregate adjusted tax basis and holding period in such holder’s post-split shares of Common Stock as such holder had in such holder’s shares of Common Stock immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split.

In general, the receipt of cash by a U.S. holder in lieu of a fractional share will be a taxable transaction to such holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Section 302 of the Code sets forth several tests which, if applicable treat a U.S. holder’s exchange of pre-split shares of Common Stock solely for cash in the Reverse Stock Split as a “sale or exchange” of such shares. For example, if the exchange of pre-split shares of Common Stock solely for cash (1) results in a “complete termination” of such holder’s interest in the Company, (2) is “substantially disproportionate” with respect to such holder, or (3) is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” with respect to the such holder (each such test referred to herein as a “Section 302 test” and described in more detail below), then such exchange will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a taxable sale or exchange of such shares. To be clear, there are other tests under Section 302 of the Code which may also result in the treatment of an exchange of Common Shares solely for cash in connection with the Reverse Stock Split as a taxable sale or exchange, but those other tests are not specifically addressed in this discussion.

In determining whether any of the Section 302 tests mentioned above is satisfied, a U.S. holder must take into account (i) shares of our stock actually owned by such holder, and (ii) shares of our stock considered as, or deemed, owned by such U.S. holder by reason of certain constructive ownership and ownership attribution rules in the Code. Under these constructive ownership and ownership attribution rules, a U.S. holder generally will be considered to own shares of our stock which such holder has the right to acquire pursuant to the exercise of an option or warrant, or by conversion or exchange of a security, and will also be considered to own shares of our stock that are owned (and, in some cases, constructively owned) by (x) some members of such holder’s family, and (y) some entities (such as corporations, partnerships, trusts, and estates) in which such holder, a member of such holder’s family, or a related entity has a direct or indirect interest.

If any of the Section 302 tests (described more fully below) are satisfied with respect to a U.S. holder, and an exchange of Common Stock solely for cash is therefore treated as a taxable sale or exchange for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then such holder generally should recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the amount of cash received by such holder and (ii) such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Common Stock treated as sold or exchanged in the Reverse Stock Split. Gain or loss must be calculated separately with respect to each share of Common Stock exchanged in the Reverse Stock Split. Any gain or loss recognized will constitute capital gain or loss, and will constitute long-term capital gain or loss if the holder’s holding period of the stock treated as sold or exchanged is greater than one year as of the Effective Date. A reduced tax rate on long-term capital gains generally applies to individuals and other non-corporate U.S. holders. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

Conversely, if none of the Section 302 tests are satisfied with respect to a U.S. holder (e.g., immediately following the Reverse Stock Split you continue to own shares of our stock, or you are treated as continuing to own shares of our stock pursuant to the constructive ownership and ownership attribution rules), you generally should be treated as having received a distribution from the Company in an amount equal to the cash received by you in the Reverse Stock Split. The amount of a distribution received by a U.S. holder will be treated as a dividend to the extent of such holder’s ratable share of the Company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits. To the extent the receipt of cash is treated as a dividend, you will not receive any tax benefit from your basis in your shares. In general, dividends are subject to ordinary income tax rates. However, for certain individuals and other non-corporate stockholders, a dividend may qualify for the reduced tax rate applicable to long-term capital gains to the extent the dividend is treated as a “qualified dividend.” To qualify for the lower rate available to qualified dividend income, (i) an individual or non-corporate stockholder must hold the stock with respect to which the dividend is paid for more than 60 days in the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend rate, as determined pursuant to the Code, and (ii) the stock held by such stockholder must have been unhedged during such holding period, i.e., there

were no puts, calls, short sales, hedges, or other arrangements or positions in the shares or any substantially similar or related property. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor regarding your applicability for, and the appropriate federal, state, local, foreign, or other tax treatment of, any such dividend income.

To the extent that the amount of a distribution received by a U.S. holder with respect to the Reverse Stock Split exceeds such holder’s ratable share of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess generally should be treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Common Stock exchanged in the Reverse Stock Split, and any remainder generally should be treated as capital gain from the sale or exchange of the Common Stock.

If a U.S. holder’s exchange of Common Stock for cash in the Reverse Stock Split satisfies one of the following tests, then such exchange is treated as a taxable sale or exchange for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

Complete Termination. A U.S. holder’s exchange of Common Stock solely for cash in the Reverse Stock Split generally will result in a “complete termination” of such holder’s interest in us if, in connection with the Reverse Stock Split, either (i) all of the shares of our stock actually and constructively owned by such holder is exchanged for cash, or (ii) all of the shares of our stock actually owned by such holder is exchanged for cash, and, with respect to constructively owned shares of our stock, such holder is eligible to waive (and effectively waives) constructive ownership of all such stock under the procedures described in Section 302(c) of the Code.

Substantially Disproportionate Redemption. A U.S. holder’s exchange of Common Stock for cash in the Reverse Stock Split generally will be “substantially disproportionate” with respect to such holder if, among other things, immediately after the exchange (i.e., treating all Common Stock exchanged for cash in the Reverse Stock Split as no longer outstanding), (i) such holder’s percentage ownership of our voting stock is less than 80% of such holder’s percentage ownership of our voting stock immediately before the exchange (i.e., treating all Common Stock exchanged for cash in the Reverse Stock Split as outstanding), and (ii) such holder owns less than 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote. For purposes of these percentage ownership tests, a holder will be considered as owning shares of our stock owned directly as well as indirectly through application of the constructive ownership and ownership attribution rules mentioned above.

Not Essentially Equivalent to a Dividend. In order for a U.S. holder’s exchange of Common Stock for cash in the Reverse Stock Split to qualify as “not essentially equivalent to a dividend,” such holder must experience a “meaningful reduction” in such holder’s proportionate interest in us as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, taking into account the constructive ownership and ownership attribution rules mentioned above. Whether a U.S. holder’s exchange of Common Stock pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split will result in a “meaningful reduction” of such holder’s proportionate interest will depend on such holder’s particular facts and circumstances.

Stockholders should consult with their own tax advisors respecting their particular situations with respect to whether any of the Section 302 tests discussed above, or any of the other rules set forth in Section 302 of the Code, are applicable so as to result in the treatment of the exchange of our Common Stock solely for cash in connection with the Reverse Stock Split as a taxable sale or exchange of such stockholder’s shares of our Common Stock.

The Reverse Stock Split is generally expected to be treated as a form of reorganization defined in Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Code as a recapitalization. Under Section 354 of the Code, generally no gain or loss will be recognized if stock in a corporation that is a party to a reorganization is exchanged solely for stock. Under Code Section 356, if Section 354 would apply but for the fact that the consideration received consists not only of stock but also of other property, such as money (such other consideration sometimes referred to as “boot”), then gain must be recognized in an amount not in excess of the “boot” received. A loss generally may not be recognized. The gain is generally measured share-by-share, and depends upon the holder’s basis in each share. If the distribution of “boot” in the Reverse Stock Split has the effect of a distribution of a dividend, then the amount otherwise treated as gain is treated as a dividend. To determine whether any such gain is to be treated as a dividend, the stockholder hypothetically assumes that such stockholder first received stock equal to the amount of boot received, and then caused that stock to be redeemed for the boot consideration. The hypothetical redemption is tested under the Section 302 tests described above (and the other tests set forth in Section 302 of the Code, but not discussed above). For those holders who receive cash in lieu of fractional shares and whose percentage interest in the Company is

enhanced or not materially diminished, the gain will be treated as a distribution, and a dividend to the extent of the U.S. holder’s ratable share of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. For those holders who receive cash in lieu of fraction shares whose percentage interest in the Company is substantially diminished under the Section 302 tests (or any other applicable test), the gain is treated as arising out of a sale of our Common Stock. In such a case, the basis in the stock received in the Reverse Stock Split is the same as the aggregate adjusted tax basis the holder had immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split decreased by the amount of money received and increased by the amount treated as either gain or a dividend.

In contrast to the discussion above, based on certain administrative guidance it is possible that U.S. holders who receive both stock and cash in the Reverse Stock Split may instead be treated as if they received all stock in a tax-free reorganization and then had their fractional shares redeemed in a separate transaction. Based on Treasury Regulation Section 1.301-1(l), even though the Reverse Stock Split is viewed as a reorganization, it is possible for any such cash received to be viewed as a dividend independent of the reorganization, followed by or preceded by the exchange of stock-for-stock in a tax-free reorganization. Each stockholder is urged to consult its own tax advisor as to the application of these rules to such stockholder under its particular circumstances.

In a reorganization defined in Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Code as a recapitalization, if one share of corporate stock is received in exchange for more than one share of corporate stock surrendered, then the aggregate basis in the shares surrendered must be allocated to the basis of the shares received, and the holding period of the stock received generally includes the holding period of the stock held immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split.

A U.S. holder may be subject to information reporting with respect to any cash received in the Reverse Stock Split. U.S. holders who are subject to information reporting and who do not provide a correct taxpayer identification number and other required information (e.g., by submitting a properly completed IRS Form W-9) may also be subject to backup withholding at a rate of 24%. Any amount withheld under such rules is not an additional tax and may be refunded or credited against the U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability otherwise arising from the Reverse Stock Split, provided that the required information is properly furnished in a timely manner to the Internal Revenue Service.

With respect to the Reverse Stock Split, the Company generally should not recognize any gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Under the Code, an “ownership change” with respect to a corporation can significantly limit the amount of pre-ownership change NOLs and certain other tax assets that the corporation may utilize after the ownership change to offset future taxable income. Very generally, an ownership change occurs if the aggregate stock ownership of holders of at least 5% of a corporation’s stock increases by more than 50 percentage points over the preceding 3-year period. The Company does not expect the Reverse Stock Split to have a material impact on its NOLs or other relevant tax assets, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

On or after the 20^th day following the mailing of this information statement, which the Company expects to commence on or about the date hereof, the Company will file the certificate of amendment to its certificate of incorporation with the Delaware Secretary of State to effect a 1-for-3,000 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock, as approved by the Company’s Board on December 21, 2020 and the holders of (a) a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock on December 21, 2020.

Under the terms of the Reverse Stock Split, every holder of record of the Common Stock on the Effective Date will be entitled to receive one share of the Company’s new common stock for every 3,000 shares of existing Common Stock held by that person. No fractional shares will be issued, and:

If you currently hold less than 3,000 shares of Common Stock and you want to continue to hold Common Stock after the Reverse Stock Split, you may do so by taking either of the following actions far enough in advance so that it is complete before the close of business on the Effective Date:

Because of the limited trading market for the Company’s common stock, you may be unable to purchase enough shares to retain an equity interest in CCUR.

The Company intends for the Reverse Stock Split to treat stockholders holding Common Stock in street name through a nominee, such as a bank or broker, in the same manner as stockholders whose shares are registered in their names. Nominees will be instructed to effect the Reverse Stock Split for their beneficial holders. However, nominees may have different procedures and stockholders holding shares in street name should contact their nominees. A stockholder holding fewer than 3,000 shares of Common Stock in street name who wants to receive cash in the Reverse Stock Split should instruct its nominee to transfer such stockholder's shares into a record account in such stockholder's name in a timely manner and in any event prior to the Effective Date, to ensure that such stockholder will be considered a holder of record prior to the Effective Date of the Reverse Stock Split. A stockholder holding fewer than 3,000 shares of Common Stock in street name through a nominee who does not transfer shares into a record account prior to the Effective Date may not have its shares cashed out in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. For instance, a stockholder's shares may not be cashed out if such stockholder's nominee is a record holder of an aggregate of 3,000 or more shares of Common Stock, holds shares for multiple stockholders in street name and does not provide such beneficial ownership positions prior to the Effective Date to our Exchange Agent. Stockholders may continue to sell their shares of the Company's Common Stock on the OTCQB market maintained by the OTC Markets Group Inc. until the Effective Date.

The Reverse Stock Split is structured as a “going private” transaction under SEC Rule 13e-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act because it is intended to, and if completed will likely, reduce the number of record holders of our common stock to fewer than 300, which will permit us to terminate our registration and periodic reporting obligations. In connection with the Reverse Stock Split, we have filed a Rule 13e-3 transaction statement on

Schedule 13E-3 with the SEC. We intend to apply for the termination of our registration and periodic reporting obligations as soon as practicable after the Effective Date of the Reverse Stock Split.

The Company intends to make the Effective Date of the Reverse Stock Split be the date that the Delaware Secretary of State accepts for filing the certificate of amendment to its certificate of incorporation. The Company intends for that date to be on or after the 20^th day following the mailing of this information statement, which the Company expect to commence on or about the date hereof.

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC has been appointed as the Exchange Agent to carry out the exchange of existing stock certificates for new Common Stock certificates and to send cash payments to the stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive fractional shares of new Common Stock as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. Promptly following the Effective Date of the Reverse Stock Split, the Exchange Agent will send a letter of transmittal to each affected stockholder, which will describe the procedures for surrendering stock certificates in exchange for new Common Stock or, if applicable, cash consideration to be received in lieu of fractional shares of new Common Stock. Upon receipt of the stock certificates and properly completed letters of transmittal, the Exchange Agent will issue the appropriate new stock certificates or make the appropriate cash payment within approximately 20 business days.

No service charges will be payable by the Company’s stockholders in connection with the exchange of certificates or the payment of cash in lieu of issuing fractional shares. The Company will bear all such expenses. The Company will not pay interest on cash sums due to any such stockholder in connection with the Reverse Stock Split.

In connection with the Reverse Stock Split, the Common Stock will be identified by a new Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures, or “CUSIP,” number. This new CUSIP number will appear on any stock certificates representing shares of the Company’s new Common Stock after the Effective Date of the Reverse Stock Split.

All stock certificates evidencing ownership of CCUR Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split will be deemed for all purposes to represent (a) a claim for cash payment in lieu of a fractional share of new CCUR Common Stock and/or (b) new certificates representing the number of shares of new CCUR Common Stock that will result from the Reverse Stock Split, whether or not the certificates representing existing CCUR Common Stock are surrendered for exchange. Do not send your stock certificates to the Company or the Exchange Agent until you have received a transmittal letter and followed the instructions therein.

Stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the Reverse Stock Split under either the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, or the DGCL.

Neither the Company, nor any of its executive officers, directors nor any person controlling the Company has made any provision in connection with the Reverse Stock Split to grant unaffiliated stockholders access to the Company’s corporate files or to obtain counsel or appraisal services for the unaffiliated stockholders at the Company’s expense.

Under Section 228 of the DGCL, unless otherwise provided in a corporation's certificate of incorporation, any action required to be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders, or any action that may be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders, may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a written consent setting forth the action to be taken is signed by stockholders having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take that action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote on the action were present and voted.

Under the DGCL and the Company’s existing restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, the approval by the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of Common Stock is required to adopt the certificate of amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation and approve the Reverse Stock Split.

On December 21, 2020, stockholders of the Company holding approximately 52.0% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock delivered to the Company their consent approving the Reverse Stock Split and other transactions contemplated thereby and adopting for filing the certificate of amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation. The stockholder consent is sufficient under Delaware law to approve the certificate of amendment and the Reverse Stock Split without the concurrence of any other stockholders. Therefore, no further action of the stockholders is necessary to approve the Reverse Stock Split. The Company has not required the approval of the Reverse Stock Split by the holders of a majority of the Company’s shares held by persons unaffiliated with CCUR.

Pursuant to Section 228(e) of the DGCL, we are delivering notice of action by written consent of the Company’s stockholders to stockholders as of the close of business on December 21, 2020, the date on which written consents executed by a sufficient number of stockholders to approve the certificate of amendment were delivered to the Company.

Given that the actual number of shares of Common Stock that the Company will purchase is unknown at this time, the total cash the Company will pay to stockholders is currently unknown, but is estimated to be approximately $3,325,000. The Company expects to use cash on hand to pay the cash consideration in connection with the Reverse Stock Split and other expenses for the Reverse Stock Split.

The following is a reasonably itemized statement of the fees and expenses that have been incurred or that are estimated to be incurred in connection with the reverse stock split and the transactions related to the Reverse Stock Split:

The Company has paid or will be responsible for paying all fees and expenses incurred or to be incurred in connection with the Reverse Stock Split and the transactions related to the Reverse Stock Split.

The par value per share of Common Stock will remain at $0.01 per share following the Reverse Stock Split. The Reverse Stock Split will result in an increase in per share net income and an increase in net book value per share of Common Stock because fewer shares of the Company’s Common Stock will be outstanding.

The Company is not aware of any license or regulatory permit that appears to be material to its business that might be adversely affected by the Reverse Stock Split, nor any approval or other action by any governmental, administrative or regulatory agency or authority, domestic or foreign, that would be required to consummate the Reverse Stock Split, other than approvals, filings or notices required under federal and state securities laws and the filing of the certificate of amendment to our certificate of incorporation with the Delaware Secretary of State.

The last reported sales price for the Company’s shares of Common Stock on the OTCQB as of March 25, 2021, was $2.80 per share. As of March 25, 2021, the Company had 352 stockholders of record.

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Company paid one special cash dividend of $0.50 per share of Common Stock. The Board will continue to assess the Company’s allocation of capital regularly and evaluate whether to declare any further special dividends or reinstate the quarterly cash dividend, which was terminated in 2018.

On March 5, 2018, the Company announced its Board authorized the repurchase of up to one million shares of the Company’s Common Stock. In February 2019, the Company completed the purchase of the authorized one million shares, and the Board authorized the repurchase of an additional 500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock under a new repurchase program that replaces and supersedes the prior repurchase program. Repurchases may be made at the discretion of management through open market or privately negotiated transactions or any combination of the same. Open market purchases may be made pursuant to trading plans subject to the restrictions and protections of Rule 10b5-1 and/or Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Act. At December 31, 2020, there were 364,298 shares available for repurchase under the program.

We currently provide commercial loans to local, regional, and national builders, developers, and commercial landowners and also acquire, own, and manage a portfolio of real property for development through our subsidiary Recur Holdings LLC (“Recur”) and its subsidiaries. Prior to March 10, 2021, we also conducted merchant cash advances (“MCA”) and other financial services, conducted primarily through our former subsidiary LM Capital Solutions, LLC (d/b/a “LuxeMark Capital”) (“LMCS”).

Prior to March 10, 2021, we held a 51% interest in LMCS, with the remaining 49% held by AZOKKB, LLC (formerly named LuxeMark Capital, LLC and herein referenced as “Old LuxeMark”). Through LMCS, we managed a network of MCA funders (the “Funders”) and syndicate participants who provided those Funders with capital by purchasing participation interests in or co-funding MCA transactions. In addition, we provided loans to Funders, the proceeds of which were used by the Funders to fund MCAs. LMCS’ daily operations were led by the three principals of Old LuxeMark. We provided operational, accounting, and legal support to LMCS. On July 17, 2020, we entered into a series of agreements with Old LuxeMark pursuant to which our interest in LMCS was reduced from 80% to 51%. After the repayment of the outstanding balance of a master promissory note issued by LMCS to us, Old LuxeMark had the right to purchase the remaining 51% equity interest in LMCS. On March 10, 2021, we entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement to sell our remaining equity interests in LMCS to Old Luxemark in exchange for net proceeds of approximately $1.2 million.

In addition to our real estate operations, we actively evaluate acquisitions of additional businesses or operating assets, either as part of an expansion of our current operating segments or establishment of a new operating segment, in an effort to reinvest the proceeds of our calendar year 2017 business dispositions and maximize use of other assets such as our net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards. We may also seek additional capital and financing to support the purchase of additional businesses and/or to provide additional working capital to further develop our operating segments. We believe that these activities will enable us to identify, acquire, and grow businesses and assets that will maximize value for all our stockholders.

The global outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization and a national emergency by the U.S. government in March 2020 and has negatively impacted the U.S. and global economy, disrupted global supply chains, resulted in significant travel and transport restrictions, including mandated closures and orders to “shelter-in-place,” and created significant disruption of the financial markets. The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operational and financial performance will depend on future developments, including the duration and spread of the pandemic and related actions taken by the U.S. government, state and local government officials, and international governments to prevent disease spread, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted.

Our MCA and other financial services segment experienced a decline in revenues during the three and six months ended December 31, 2020, which management believes is predominantly due to the economic uncertainties caused by the pandemic, and we anticipate our MCA revenues will continue to be adversely affected while major parts of the U.S. economy are restricted by mandatory business shutdowns and/or stay-at-home orders, as well as other effects of the pandemic. We and our finance partners decreased our volume of new funding arrangements while evaluating the effect of the current economic uncertainties on the MCA business and its customers during the three and six months ended December 31, 2020. During the fourth quarter of our fiscal year 2020, management concluded that it would not resume funding MCAs with Funders and would focus our MCA efforts exclusively on MCA syndication fee income generated by our LMCS business unit. Our reduced participation in MCA funding through Funders reduces our syndication fee income and revenue from direct funding of MCAs.

Our real estate-related revenues have continued to remain stable during the three and six months ended December 31, 2020 and we believe that our real estate borrowers will continue to be able to service their real estate loans. We continue to develop real estate for future sale. While we do not believe that any of these projects warrant impairment charges or other reserves at this point, we do expect that the economic impact of the pandemic will result in a delay in the eventual sale of this real estate.

In August 2020, we established CCUR Aviation Finance, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary through which we operate our aviation funding business. Since August 2018, we have been providing fully refundable deposits into the

aircraft finance market, which are used during the initial due diligence period for aircraft (“aviation deposits”). We have financed 12 transactions, each of which has utilized the services of Wright Brothers, based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, as the escrow agent. Prior to January 12, 2021, each aviation deposit we provided had been returned on time and without incident.

On January 12, 2021, we were due the return of $8,500,000 in aviation deposits. Upon inquiry to Wright Brothers and following repeated unsuccessful attempts to contact it or its principal, Debbie Mercer-Erwin, we learned that on or about December 17, 2020, Ms. Mercer-Erwin had been arrested by law enforcement and that all assets of Wright Brothers had been frozen.

In addition to the deposit funds mentioned above, we were also due the return of a further $5,500,000 in aviation deposits on January 25, 2021.

We are currently fully cooperating with authorities to expedite the return of all aviation deposits that were due. We have been told by authorities that we are not the subject of any investigations related to Ms. Mercer-Erwin or Wright Brothers. Based on an examination of all information currently available to us, we have determined that it is probable a loss has occurred related to our aviation deposits. Due to the limited information available and uncertainty related to the specific sources of recovery and their timing, we are unable to make the determination that any amount of recovery is probable. As a result, our Board of Directors and management determined on February 6, 2021 that the appropriate action is a full write-down of our aviation deposits during the three and six months ended December 31, 2020. The write-down is reported as part of provision for credit losses on advances on the consolidated statements of operations for the period ended December 31, 2020.

We expect to aggressively pursue all remedies for recovery, including those related to insurance and actions against all parties that may have contributed to the loss of the aviation deposits. Since the loss of our aviation deposits held by Wright Brothers, we are re-evaluating our aviation funding business.

Consistent with the Company’s goal to pursue appropriate rights and remedies to recover the lost aviation deposits, on March 1, 2021, it filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against South Aviation, Inc., its counterparty in the aviation deposits and Frederica A. Machado, the principal of South Aviation. The Company also simultaneously filed an Emergency Motion for the Immediate Appointment of a Receiver. The Company believes such actions will be the most effective way to pursue a recovery of funds, but has been advised that this is most likely to result in years of complex litigation with any recovery being highly uncertain.

For more details surrounding the Ponzi scheme that contributed to the Company’s losses, the Third Superseding Indictment filed February 24, 2021 by the United States of America and unsealed a few days later, can be found at the following link. https://interactive.wfaa.com/pdfs/Onalaskindictment.pdf

Through most of the three and six months ended December 31, 2020, we have continued to actively evaluate and engage with potential acquisition target candidates; however, the pandemic has delayed our due diligence process by impeding our ability to participate in in-person visits and physical tours and complicating our ability to place valuations on targets given the uncertainty in the global markets. We expect this uncertainty to continue over the next few months. Thus, while we have not experienced a significant slowing of merger and acquisition activity, any acquisitions that we decide to pursue may take longer to consummate.

The following table provides information regarding our executive officers and directors as of December 21, 2020.

Each of our directors will serve in that capacity until our next annual stockholder meeting or until their successors are elected and qualified. Officers hold their positions at the will of our Board of Directors. There are no

arrangements, agreements or understandings between non-management security holders and management under which non-management security holders may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our affairs.

Mr. Volshteyn has served as interim COO and President of the Company since June 2020, when the former chief executive officer took an unpaid leave of absence. Since August 2020, Mr. Volshteyn has served as the chief financial officer and a director of Spartacus Acquisition Corp., a NASDAQ-listed special purpose acquisition corporation. From January 2019 through June 2020, Mr. Volshteyn served as Senior Vice President of Business Development of the Company. Mr. Volshteyn began his career as a research analyst and investment banker and has over 20 years of experience in the investment management industry. He served as the Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer at Echelon Investment Partners LP from May 2016 to December 2018 and as an Analyst and Portfolio Manager at Millennium Management from July 2007 to March 2016. From August 2019 to February 2020, Mr. Volshteyn served on the board of directors for Goodman Networks, Inc. He graduated with a Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance, with highest honors, from the University of Texas at Austin.

Mr. Tegge is a Senior Associate of Financial Reporting for Brio Financial Group since 2015. In that capacity, he consults with various private and public companies with respect to financial reporting, analysis of complex financial instruments, and the valuation of such instruments. Mr. Tegge served as interim Chief Financial Officer of Arista Financial Corp. (ARST) from October 2018 to January 2020. Arista Financial Corp is a finance company that provides financing to other small finance companies that do not have significant access to the capital markets. Mr. Tegge served as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of U.S. Gold Corp. (USAU) from November 2018 to December 2018. U.S. Gold Corp is a gold and precious metals exploration company pursuing exploration and development opportunities primarily in Nevada and Wyoming. Mr. Tegge has a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from New Jersey Institute of Technology.

Since December 2013, Mr. Gerritsen has served as the President of Live Microsystems, Inc. (formerly Live Wire Mobile, Inc.), and prior to that time, he was the Secretary and General Counsel. Mr. Gerritsen served as outside General Counsel to Evolving Systems Inc. from 2016 to 2017. Prior to joining Live Microsystems, he had a private practice advising businesses. Mr. Gerritsen previously worked at McDermott, Will & Emery, Nutter McClennon & Fish, Testa Hurwitz and Thibeault, and Tucker & Goldstein. Mr. Gerritsen received his B.A. degree in English and Political Science from the University of Connecticut and his J.D. degree from Suffolk University Law School.

Mr. Nicol is a seasoned board director and advisor for technology-based businesses. He currently serves on the board of Evolving Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVOL), a publicly traded company, where he has served on the audit committee since March 2004 and as the committee chairman since January 2011 and on the compensation committee since March 2004 and as the committee chairman since November 2005. In July 2019, he was appointed a member of the board of Nanoveu Limited (NVU), listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX). Mr. Nicol also serves as an independent board member of a privately-held provider of facilities management SaaS services. Mr. Nicol is an active member of the National Association of Corporate Directors and Financial Executives International. Since 2015, he has been on the faculty in the Finance Department at the Bloch School of Management at the University of Missouri – Kansas City. From February 2012 through July 2015, Mr. Nicol was President and Chief Operations Officer of Strongwatch, Inc., a security innovation company that was subsequently acquired. Prior to that, he was a consultant to several companies, each subsequently acquired by listed companies. From January 2006 through January 2009, Mr. Nicol was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Solutionary, Inc., a managed IT security services provider, since acquired by NTT Security. Prior to 2006, Mr. Nicol held numerous senior executive positions focused on operations, strategy, product management and business development at communication and technology service companies, which included Fortune 500 companies as well as smaller earlier stage and growth companies.

Mr. Pons was previously a director of the Company from July 2012 to December 2018. Mr. Pons has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Spartan Advisors, Inc., a management consulting firm specializing in

telecom and technology companies, since January 2011. From May 2016 to December 2016, Mr. Pons served as Executive Vice President of PTGi-ICS, a wholly owned subsidiary of HC2 Holdings, Inc. (formerly PTGi Holdings, formerly Primus Telecommunications). From May 2014 until May 2016, he served as Executive President of Business Development of HC2 Holdings, Inc, a diversified holding company with operating subsidiaries primarily in the United States and the United Kingdom. From January 2008 to January 2011, he was Senior Vice President, Capital Markets, at TMNG Global, a global consulting firm to technology, media, communications and financial services companies. Prior to this, Mr. Pons served in a number of senior management roles in technology companies, including Uphonia (formerly SmartServ Online, Inc.), a wireless applications development company, and FreedomPay, a cashless retail payment system vendor. Mr. Pons has served on the board of directors of Seachange International Inc. (NASDAQ:SEAC) since February 2019 and as the Chairman since November 2019. Mr. Pons previously served on the board of directors of Alaska Communications Inc. (NASDAQ: ALSK) from May 2018 to May 2019, Inseego Corp. (NASDAQ: INSG) (formerly Novatel Wireless) from October 2014 to October 2019, HC2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HCHC) from September 2011 to June 2016 and MRV Communications, Inc. (formerly NASDAQ: MRVC) from October 2011 to August 2017. He also previously served on the board of directors of Arbinet, Proxim Wireless, Network-1 Security Systems, DragonWave, Inc. and Live Microsystems, Inc. (formerly Live Wire Mobile, Inc.).

Mr. Singer currently serves as a consultant for Remus Holdings, Inc., a closely held investment company, a position he has held since April 2016. From 2000 to 2016, Mr. Singer served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Banknote Corporation, a provider of secure financial products and solutions and a public company through 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Singer was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Remus Holdings, Inc. from 1994 to 2000. Mr. Singer has served on numerous public and private company boards, including ABNote do Brazil (a publicly traded subsidiary of American Banknote Corporation now operating as Valid SA), CooperVision, Inc., Anacomp, Inc., Motient Corporation (now operating as TerreStar Corporation), Globix Corporation, TVMAX Holdings, Inc. and Galaxy Cable, Inc. (now operating as Galaxy Cablevision). In addition, Mr. Singer served as Chairman of the board of directors of Motient Corporation and Globix Corporation.

The table below provides information about the beneficial ownership of CCUR’s common stock as of December 21, 2020, by each person known by the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock as well as by each director, director nominee and named executive officer and by all directors and executive officers as a group. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the ownership percentage of that person, shares deemed outstanding include shares of CCUR’s common stock subject to stock options held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of December 21, 2020. However, these shares are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the ownership percentage of any other person. The ownership percentage is based on 8,972,524 shares of CCUR’s common stock outstanding as of December 21, 2020. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, each of the persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities indicated as beneficially owned by such person, subject to community property laws where applicable. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, the address for each of the beneficial owners is c/o CCUR Holdings, Inc., 6470 East Johns Crossing, Suite 490, Duluth, Georgia 30097.

In accordance with its charter, our Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving all related party transactions and considers the factors that it determines to be most relevant to evaluating each applicable transaction. A report is made to our Audit Committee annually by our management and our independent registered public accounting firm disclosing any known related party transactions. The Audit Committee reviewed and approved the following reportable transactions occurring during Fiscal Year 2020 and Fiscal Year 2019.

On July 2, 2020, the Company entered into a letter of intent (the “LOI”) proposing to provide a secured loan of up to $10 million to SeaChange International, Inc. (“SeaChange”). Among other things, the LOI proposed a loan that would have been fully secured by a first lien on assets of SeaChange, have a term of one year with two options to extend the term for an additional six months, and carry an interest rate of ten percent (10%) per annum on the outstanding principal amount of the loan. Upon closing of the loan, SeaChange would have paid a three percent (3%) commitment fee to the Company with the option to pay up to fifty percent (50%) of the fee in SeaChange common stock and a two percent (2%) fee upon the exercise of any six month extension of the loan term. The LOI was binding subject to several closing conditions including the negotiation of definitive loan documents and final approval of our Board of Directors.

As two of its members have relationships involving SeaChange, the Company’s board of directors evaluated the nature of those relationships prior to approving any documentation related to the transactions proposed in the LOI. Mr. Pons and Mr. Singer sit on the board of directors of SeaChange, and thus recused themselves from any deliberations by the Company’s Board of Directors relating to the LOI and the transactions proposed thereby. In addition, TAR Holdings, LLC, an entity over which Karen Singer holds sole voting and dispositive power, owns 16.6% of SeaChange’s outstanding common stock, according to that certain Schedule 13D/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Ms. Singer on August 12, 2019. Ms. Singer is Mr. Singer’s sister-in-law and the mother of Julian Singer, who is a significant stockholder of the Company. The LOI expired on September 2, 2020 prior to the finalization of definitive documentation or any loan being made.

As disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on February 14, 2019 and June 8, 2020, the Company entered into a management agreement, as amended from time to time (the “Management Agreement”), with CIDM LLC (and subsequently assigned to CIDM II, LLC, referenced herein as the “Asset Manager”) on February 14, 2019 under which the Asset Manager (i) provides the Company with advisory services with respect to the management and allocation of the Company’s assets and (ii) exercises discretionary management authority over the Company’s trading portfolio of marketable securities.

The Asset Manager is an entity managed and owned by Julian Singer. Mr. Singer is also the managing principal of JDS1, an entity that owns 3,586,269 shares of the Company’s common stock based on a Schedule 13D/A filed by Mr. Singer with the SEC on February 21, 2019, which comprises approximately 40.3% of the Company’s outstanding stock as of June 30, 2020. Under the Management Agreement, Mr. Singer is defined as a “Key Person” and the Company is relying on his relevant expertise for performance under the Management Agreement.

The Asset Manager will receive the following compensation for performance under the Management Agreement:

Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement, the Asset Manager is required to consider participation by the Company in all appropriate opportunities within the purpose and scope of the Company’s objectives that are under consideration for the accounts of other clients of the Asset Manager or any of its affiliates. Thus, the Company may hold investments similar to or in conjunction with the Asset Manager or its affiliates.

On October 29, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Kandela, LLC (“Kandela”), pursuant to which the Company provided Kandela with a $3,000,000 line of credit secured by a first priority security interest in accounts receivable and other assets of Kandela and subject to a monthly interest payment equal to the prime rate plus five percent per annum. At the time of the loan affiliate of JDS1 owned a 10% equity interest in Kandela. On March 21, 2019, CCUR received payment in full of all amounts owed to it by Kandela, including fees and interest payments, under the loan agreement and terminated the agreement. CCUR received $65,000 in total fees, including $45,000 paid as an early termination fee, and $34,586 in total interest payments.

On or around November 14, 2018, the Company purchased $2,500,000 aggregate principal amount of bonds issued by HC2 Holdings, Inc., from JDS1 at the prevailing market price.

As announced in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 2, 2018, pursuant to the Separation and Consulting Agreement and General Release of Claims (the “Separation Agreement”) with Mr. Elder, CCUR’s former Chief Executive Officer and a former director of the Company, Mr. Elder provided consulting services to the Company from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. As consideration for the consulting services, Mr. Elder received: (i) one payment of $217,722 on or about July 1, 2018; and (ii) an aggregate of $217,722 payable in six substantially equal monthly installments during the period beginning on July 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. Mr. Elder was eligible to also receive an “Incentive Transaction Bonus” (as defined in the Separation Agreement) upon the consummation of any acquisition of any entity or business (as defined in the Separation Agreement, a “Sourced Business”) by the Company that Mr. Elder sourced and introduced to the Company during the consulting term and consummated on or before the 90th day following the termination of the consulting term (as defined in the Separation Agreement, a “Sourced Transaction”). The Incentive Transaction Bonus

equaled the sum of (i) 1% of the total consideration paid by the Company for the Sourced Business in the Sourced Transaction and (ii) 7.5% of the Net Asset Value (as defined in the Separation Agreement) of a subsequent sale of the Sourced Business by the Company consummated on or before the 5th anniversary of the closing of the Sourced Transaction. The Separation Agreement was amended on June 25, 2018 to allow Mr. Elder to elect to receive the consulting payments directly or through his company Sky Advisors LLC. The Separation Agreement expired on December 31, 2018 and no Incentive Transaction Bonus was paid under the Separation Agreement.

In the table below, we provide you with historical selected financial data for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. This information is derived from our consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2020, which was filed by the Company on September 15, 2020 (amounts in thousands, except share and per share data).

In the table below, we provide you with historical selected financial data for the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. This information is derived from our consolidated financial statements included in the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2020 filed on February 16, 2021 (amounts in thousands, except share and per share data).

The Company’s net book value at June 30, 2020 and at December 31, 2020 was $61,289,000 and $56,889,000, respectively, or approximately $6.97 and $6.44 per share, respectively.

ValueScope was engaged to advise the Board of Directors of CCUR Holdings, Inc. (“CCUR” or the “Company”) as to the fairness of a potential purchase of common shares as of a current date. Our analysis included a review of documents and financial information of CCUR, supporting capital markets and other information. This opinion was based on valuation analyses conducted in accordance with generally accepted valuation standards, which included, but were not necessarily limited to, the following procedures:

In connection with our review, we did not independently verify any of the foregoing information; we relied on its completeness and accuracy in all material aspects. We are not acting as the financial advisor in connection with the proposed transaction. It is understood this letter is for the use of the Board of Directors of CCUR and may be quoted and referred to, in whole or in part, in its disclosure statement to its investors seeking approval of the proposed transaction.

We analyzed the Company’s trading history and utilized the market and asset approaches in determining a price per share on a minority, marketable basis. The COVID-19 global pandemic resulted in disruption to the financial markets and businesses.

On January 26, 2021, the Company filed a Form 8-K disclosing the potential loss of $14 million of aircraft deposits. The Company utilized Wright Brothers Aircraft Title, Inc. (“WBAT”) since August 2018 as the escrow agent for 12 prior due diligence transactions involving fully refundable aircraft deposits. CCUR was due a return of $8.5 million deposit from WBAT on January 12, 2021. After multiple unsuccessful attempts to contact WBAT and its principal Debbie Mercer-Erwin, the Company learned that Ms. Mercer-Erwin was arrested by law enforcement on or around December 17, 2020 and all assets of WBAT were frozen.

Per discussions with CCUR management, the Company has been advised by outside counsel that CCUR is not recognized as an insured party on the WBAT policy issued by Lloyd’s and the policy is likely to be void due to the alleged criminal misconduct by WBAT and/or its principal Ms. Mercer-Erwin. Counsel advised CCUR management that coverage under its own policy for this matter is highly uncertain and would require significant time and money to exhaust other legal remedies. CCUR has been advised the most realistic scenario to recover any portion of the lost

deposits would be to pursue complex litigation lasting multiple years with no reasonable certainty of a favorable outcome. On February 10, 2021, the Company issued an 8-K to disclose that its Board of Directors determined the appropriate action related to the WBAT issue was a write down of $13.8 million of aviation deposits.

We evaluated the volume weighted average price (VWAP) of the CCUR stock over multiple time periods through February 12^th. We selected the VWAP of $2.86 from January 27, 2021, date of the first disclosure of the WBAT issue, to February 12, 2021. The concluded fair market value price of $2.86 implies a price to book ratio of 0.46x. The stock price analyses are presented in Schedules B.1 and B.2.

Financial lending institutions often trade at prices below book value due to difficulty and uncertainty of evaluating their risk profile. We examined the price to book ratios of several publicly traded companies operating in the industry with similar revenues. These companies included:

During the period June 30, 2020 to February 12, 2021, each of these three companies reported a price to book ratio under 0.35x (reference Schedule B.3).

We were unable to determine a price for the Company’s stock using the income approach. The Company has reported operating losses ranging from $1.7 million to $9.3 million during the last five fiscal years. CCUR reported an operating loss of $3.8 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, excluding the $13.8 million write down. The Company has reported positive net income in prior periods due solely to investments, interest income, and tax credits. Per discussions with management, the Company will ultimately be converting its marketable investments into capital for a new business venture. However, the timing and nature of such business is uncertain.

As part of our analysis, we performed a modified NAV approach as an indication of value. The Company reported $64,889,000 of total assets as of December 31, 2020. Given the current operating losses and uncertain business model, it is reasonable the current intangible assets and goodwill are the balance sheet are worthless. Total assets net of current intangibles, would be adjusted to $62,732,000. The Company has liabilities of $8,629,000 and a minority interest of $1,179,000. We also estimated the potential operating drag of $5 million during the transition period. This estimate is based on a review of the Company’s historical operating losses and discussions with Company management. Company management represented that assets will be utilized in the new business venture as a private company. As a result, it is appropriate to consider discounts for lack of control and marketability. Typically, we see discounts for lack of control in the 10-25% range and discounts for lack of marketability in the 25-45% range. Businesses with limited financials, historical operating losses, and uncertain prospects typically fall on the upper end of the range. Therefore, assumed a combined 45% to 50% discount in the calculation, with a midpoint of 47.5%. We calculated an adjusted net asset value (equity) of $25,160,000, which would be equivalent to $2.85 per share based on 8,839,344 shares outstanding.

Based on the procedures outlined herein and the corresponding analysis, it our opinion that a fair price per share to be paid to minority shareholders is:

We are independent of CCUR Holdings and we have no current or prospective economic interest in the assets that are the subject of this opinion. Our fee for this opinion was in no way influenced by the results of our analysis.