Bailiwick of Jersey | | | 2819 | | | 98-1737136 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | | (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) | | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
Michael Kaplan William H. Aaronson Cheryl Chan Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP 450 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017 Tel.: (212) 450-4000 | | | Sara Ponessa General Counsel Livent Corporation 1818 Market Street, Suite 2550 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 Tel.: (215) 299-5900 | | | Brian J. Fahrney Joseph P. Michaels Sidley Austin LLP One South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Tel.: (312) 853-7000 | | | John Sanders Chief Legal Officer and Company Secretary Allkem Limited Riparian Plaza—Level 35 71 Eagle Street Brisbane, Queensland 4000 Australia Tel.: +61 7 3064 3600 |
Large accelerated filer | | | ☒ | | | Accelerated filer | | | ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer | | | ☐ | | | Smaller reporting company | | | ☐ |
| | | | Emerging growth company | | | ☐ |
| | /s/ Paul W. Graves | | | /s/ Pierre Brondeau | |
| | Paul W. Graves | | | Pierre Brondeau | |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer | | | Chairman of the Board |
1. | Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal. To adopt the Transaction Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2023, as amended by the Amendment to Transaction Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2023 (and as may be further amended from time to time, the “Transaction Agreement”), by and among Livent Corporation (“Livent”), Allkem Limited, an Australian public company limited by shares (“Allkem”), Allkem Livent plc, a public limited company incorporated under the laws of the Bailiwick of Jersey (originally incorporated as Lightning-A Limited, a private limited company incorporated under the laws of the Bailiwick of Jersey) (“NewCo”) and Lightning-A Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware company (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which, among other transactions, Merger Sub will merge with and into Livent, with Livent surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of NewCo (the “merger”), and each share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Livent (the “Livent Shares”), other than certain excluded shares, will be converted into the right to receive 2.406 ordinary shares, par value $1.00 per share, of NewCo (the “NewCo Shares”), and approve the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, including the merger (the “Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal”). “Allkem Livent plc” is the temporary name of NewCo. |
2. | Livent Advisory Compensation Proposal. To approve, in a non-binding, advisory vote, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Livent’s named executive officers in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement (the “Livent Advisory Compensation Proposal”). |
3. | NewCo Advisory Governance Documents Proposals. To approve, in non-binding, advisory votes, certain provisions of the articles of association of NewCo (the “NewCo Advisory Governance Documents Proposals”). |
4. | Livent Adjournment Proposal. To approve one or more adjournments of the Livent Special Meeting to a later date or dates for any purpose if necessary or appropriate, including if necessary or appropriate to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the Transaction Agreement and approve the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, at the time of the Livent Special Meeting (the “Livent Adjournment Proposal”). |
| | | | BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, | ||
| | | | |||
| | | | /s/ Sara Ponessa | ||
Dated: | | | [ ], 2023 | | | Sara Ponessa |
| | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | | | Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
• | “Allkem” refers to Allkem Limited, an Australian public company limited by shares; |
• | “Allkem Board” refers to the board of directors of Allkem; |
• | “Allkem Shareholder Approval” refers to the approval of the scheme at the scheme meeting by the Allkem shareholders in accordance with the Australian Corporations Act by (i) a majority in number of Allkem shareholders that are present and voting at the scheme meeting (either in person or by proxy or by corporate representative) and (ii) 75% or more of the votes cast on the resolution; and in the case of (i), such other threshold as approved by the Court; |
• | “Allkem Shares” refers to the ordinary shares of Allkem; |
• | “Antitrust Division” refers to the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice; |
• | “ASIC” refers to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission; |
• | “ASX” refers to the ASX Limited (ABN 98 008 624 691) and where the context requires, the securities exchange that it operates; |
• | “ATO” refers to the Australian Taxation Office; |
• | “ATO Class Ruling” refers to a class ruling from the ATO in relation to rollover relief for Allkem shareholders who are Australian tax residents who are receiving the scheme consideration in connection with the scheme; |
• | “Australian Accounting Standards” refers to the Australian Accounting Standards, consistently applied; |
• | “Australian Corporations Act” refers to the Australian Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); |
• | “butyllithium” refers to an organolithium compound which is used to initiate polymerization in the manufacturing of synthetic rubber and other polymers and as a chemical reagent in the synthesis of certain organic compounds; |
• | “Cauchari” refers to Allkem’s Cauchari lithium brine project in Jujuy Province, Argentina; |
• | “CDIs” refers to NewCo CHESS Depositary Instruments, each representing a beneficial ownership interest (but not legal title) in one NewCo Share; |
• | “CHESS” refers to the Clearing House Electronic Subregister System; |
• | “closing” refers to the closing of the transaction; |
• | “Code” refers to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; |
• | “Competing Proposal” refers to, in the case of Livent and Allkem, as applicable, any inquiry, contract, proposal, offer or indication of interest from any third party relating to any transaction or series of related transactions (other than transactions only with the other of Allkem or Livent, respectively, or any of such other party’s subsidiaries) involving, directly or indirectly: (a) any acquisition (by asset purchase, equity purchase, merger, scheme of arrangement (solely in the case of Allkem) or otherwise) by any person or “group” (within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) of any business or assets of such party or any of its subsidiaries (including capital stock of or ownership interest in any subsidiary) that constitute 20% or more of such party’s and its subsidiaries’ consolidated assets (by fair market value), or generated 20% or more of such party’s and its subsidiaries’ net revenue or earnings for the preceding 12 months, or any license, lease or long-term supply agreement having a similar economic effect, (b) any acquisition of beneficial ownership by any person or “group” (within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) of 20% or more of the outstanding Livent Shares or Allkem Shares, respectively, or any other securities entitled to vote on the election of directors or any tender or exchange offer that if consummated would result in any person or “group” (within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) beneficially owning 20% or more of the outstanding Livent Shares or Allkem Shares, respectively, entitled to vote on the election of directors or (c) any merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination, scheme of arrangement (solely in the case of Allkem), recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or similar |
• | “Court” refers to the Federal Court of Australia (Western Australian registry), or such other court of competent jurisdiction under the Australian Corporations Act as may be agreed to in writing by Livent and Allkem; |
• | “deed poll” refers to the deed poll under which NewCo covenants in favor of the Allkem shareholders to perform the obligations attributed to NewCo under the scheme provided for under the Transaction Agreement; |
• | “DGCL” refers to the Delaware General Corporation Law, as amended; |
• | “effective time” refers to the effective time of the merger; |
• | “end date” refers to February 10, 2024 (subject to extension by either party until May 10, 2024 in order to obtain required antitrust, investment screening or other regulatory approvals); |
• | “Exchange Act” refers to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; |
• | “First Court Hearing” refers to the hearing of the Court pursuant to Section 411(4)(a) of the Australian Corporations Act to consider and, if thought fit, approve the mailing of the scheme booklet (with or without amendment) and convene the scheme meeting; |
• | “fiscal year 2023” refers, when used with respect to Livent, to Livent’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2023 and, when used with respect to Allkem, to Allkem’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; |
• | “fiscal year 2024” refers, when used with respect to Livent, to Livent’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 and, when used with respect to Allkem, to Allkem’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2024; |
• | “FTC” refers to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission; |
• | “GAAP” refers to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied; |
• | “HSR Act” refers to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; |
• | “IER” refers to a report, including any update or supplementary report, of the Independent Expert setting out whether or not the scheme is in the best interests of the Allkem shareholders; |
• | “IFRS” refers to the International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, consistently applied; |
• | “Independent Expert” refers to the independent expert appointed by Allkem to prepare the IER, which is Kroll Australia Pty Ltd; |
• | “Intervening Event” refers to, in the case of Livent and Allkem, as applicable, an effect that is material to such party that occurs or arises after the date of the Transaction Agreement that was not known to or reasonably foreseeable by such party’s board of directors as of the date of the Transaction Agreement (or, if known or reasonably foreseeable, the magnitude or material consequences of which were not known or reasonably foreseeable by such party’s board of directors as of the date of the Transaction Agreement); provided, however, that in no event shall the following constitute an Intervening Event: (a) the receipt, existence or terms of an actual or possible Competing Proposal or Superior Proposal of such party, (b) any change, in and of itself, in the price or trading volume of Livent Shares or Allkem Shares, respectively (it being understood that the underlying facts giving rise or contributing to such change may be taken into account in determining whether there has been an Intervening Event, to the extent otherwise permitted by this definition), (c) any effect relating to such party or any of its subsidiaries that does not amount to a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, (d) conditions (or changes in such conditions) in the lithium mining and chemicals industry (including changes in general market prices for lithium chemicals, lithium spodumene concentrate and related products (including pricing under futures contracts) and political or regulatory changes affecting the industry or any changes in applicable law), (e) any opportunity to acquire (by merger, joint venture, partnership, consolidation, scheme of arrangement (solely |
• | “Irish IntermediateCo” refers to an Irish private company limited by shares that will be formed in connection with the transaction; |
• | “IRS” refers to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service; |
• | “James Bay” refers to Allkem’s James Bay lithium spodumene project in Québec, Canada; |
• | “Jersey Companies Law” refers to the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991; |
• | “Jersey law” refers to the laws of the Bailiwick of Jersey; |
• | “kMT” refers to a thousand metric tons; |
• | “LCE” refers to lithium carbonate equivalent; |
• | “lithium carbonate” refers to an inorganic compound, derived mainly from lithium brine reservoirs or spodumene-bearing ores; |
• | “lithium hydroxide” refers to an inorganic compound, derived mainly from spodumene-bearing ores or lithium carbonate, that is used mainly in lithium-ion batteries for energy storage applications; |
• | “Livent” refers to Livent Corporation, a Delaware corporation; |
• | “Livent Adjournment Proposal” refers to the proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the Livent Special Meeting to a later date or dates for any purpose if necessary or appropriate, including if necessary or appropriate to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the Transaction Agreement and approve the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, at the time of the Livent Special Meeting; |
• | “Livent Advisory Compensation Proposal” refers to the proposal to approve, in a non-binding, advisory vote, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Livent’s named executive officers in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement; |
• | “Livent Board” refers to the board of directors of Livent; |
• | “Livent Director RSUs” refers to any outstanding time-vested restricted stock unit held by any Livent non-employee directors; |
• | “Livent Option” refers to any outstanding time-vested stock option with respect to Livent Shares; |
• | “Livent Proposals” refers to, collectively, the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal, the Livent Advisory Compensation Proposal, the NewCo Advisory Governance Documents Proposals and the Livent Adjournment Proposal; |
• | “Livent PSUs” refers to the outstanding performance-based restricted stock units of Livent; |
• | “Livent RSUs” refers to the outstanding time-vested restricted stock units of Livent; |
• | “Livent Shares” refers to the shares of common stock of Livent, par value $0.001 per share; |
• | “Livent Special Meeting” refers to the special meeting of Livent stockholders described in this proxy statement/prospectus; |
• | “Livent Stockholder Approval” refers to the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding Livent Shares entitled to vote on the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal, including the adoption of the Transaction Agreement and approval of the transactions contemplated thereby, at the Livent Special Meeting in favor of such adoption and approval, respectively; |
• | “Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal” refers to the proposal to adopt the Transaction Agreement and approve the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger; |
• | “merger” refers to the merger of Merger Sub with and into Livent, with Livent as the surviving company, as part of the transaction; |
• | “merger consideration” refers to the right to receive, with respect to each Livent Share (other than certain excluded shares), 2.406 NewCo Shares in the merger; |
• | “Merger Exchange Ratio” refers to 2.406 NewCo Shares for each Livent Share; |
• | “Merger Sub” refers to Lightning-A Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation; |
• | “Mt Cattlin” refers to Allkem’s Mt Cattlin spodumene operation or project in Ravensthorpe, Western Australia; |
• | “Naraha” refers to the lithium hydroxide plant in Naraha, Japan of which Allkem owns a 75% economic interest; |
• | “NewCo” refers to Allkem Livent plc, a public limited company incorporated under the Laws of the Bailiwick of Jersey (originally incorporated as Lightning-A Limited, a private limited company incorporated under the laws of the Bailiwick of Jersey, with “Allkem Livent plc” as the temporary name of this entity); |
• | “NewCo Advisory Governance Documents Proposals” refers to, collectively, the proposals to approve, in non-binding, advisory votes, certain provisions of the NewCo articles of association; |
• | “NewCo articles of association” refers to the amended and restated articles of association of NewCo, which will become effective immediately prior to the scheme effectiveness, substantially in the applicable form attached as Annex B; |
• | “NewCo memorandum of association” refers to the amended and restated memorandum of association of NewCo, which will become effective immediately prior to the scheme effectiveness, substantially in the applicable form attached as Annex B; |
• | “NewCo Organizational Documents” refers to the NewCo articles of association and the NewCo memorandum of association; |
• | “NewCo Parties” refers to NewCo, Merger Sub and, following the execution of a joinder agreement to the Transaction Agreement, Irish IntermediateCo; |
• | “NewCo Shares” refers to ordinary shares, par value $1.00 per share, of NewCo; |
• | “NYSE” refers to the New York Stock Exchange; |
• | “Olaroz” refers to the Olaroz lithium facility in Jujuy Province, Argentina of which Allkem owns a 66.5% equity interest; |
• | “pegmatite,” which includes the mineral spodumene, refers to naturally occurring igneous, or magmatic, rock formations that typically have a coarse grained texture and are mined for rare earth commodities; |
• | “Sal de Vida” refers to Allkem’s Sal de Vida lithium brine project or operation in Catamarca Province, Argentina; |
• | “sanction date” refers to the first day on which the Court hears the application for an order under section 411(4)(b) of the Australian Corporations Act approving the scheme or, if the application is adjourned or subject to appeal for any reason, the first day on which the adjourned or appealed application is heard; |
• | “Sarbanes-Oxley Act” refers to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; |
• | “scheme” refers to the scheme of arrangement provided for under the Transaction Agreement; |
• | “scheme booklet” refers to a document prepared by Allkem in relation to the scheme explaining the effect of the scheme and setting out certain prescribed information including notice of the scheme meeting; |
• | “scheme consideration” refers to the right to receive, with respect to each Allkem Share, one CDI or, in certain cases, one NewCo Share, in the scheme; |
• | “scheme effectiveness” refers to the scheme becoming effective under the Australian Corporations Act, which will occur on the date on which the Court order approving the scheme is filed with ASIC; |
• | “Scheme Exchange Ratio” refers to one NewCo Share or CDI for each Allkem Share; |
• | “scheme implementation” refers to the issue of the scheme consideration (comprising NewCo Shares and CDIs) to former Allkem shareholders followed by the transfer of all of the Allkem Shares to NewCo, each in accordance with the terms and conditions of the scheme; |
• | “scheme meeting” refers to the meeting of Allkem shareholders (and any adjournment thereof) ordered by the Court to be convened under subsection 411(1) of the Australian Corporations Act to consider and vote on the scheme; |
• | “Scheme Record Date” refers to 7:00 pm (Sydney time) on the second ASX trading day after scheme effectiveness, or such other date and time as may be agreed to in writing by Allkem and Livent; |
• | “SEC” refers to the Securities and Exchange Commission; |
• | “Second Court Hearing” refers to the hearing of the Court pursuant to Section 411(4)(b) of the Australian Corporations Act to approve the scheme; |
• | “Securities Act” refers to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; |
• | “spodumene” or “lithium bearing spodumene” refers to a naturally occurring lithium bearing ore, derived mainly from mining of lithium-bearing pegmatite formations. Spodumene is typically used in concentrated form as feedstock for lithium carbonate or hydroxide production, and valued based on its lithium content among other factors; |
• | “Superior Proposal” refers to, in case of Livent or Allkem, as applicable, a bona fide written proposal that is not solicited after the date of the Transaction Agreement in breach of the Transaction Agreement and is made after the date of the Transaction Agreement by any person or “group” (within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) (other than the other party or any of its affiliates) to acquire, directly or indirectly, (a) businesses or assets of Livent or Allkem, respectively, or any of their subsidiaries, as applicable (including capital stock of or ownership interest in any subsidiary) that account for all or substantially all of the fair market value of such party and its subsidiaries’ assets or that generated all or substantially all of such party and its subsidiaries’ net revenue or earnings for the preceding 12 months, respectively, or (b) all or substantially all of the outstanding Livent Shares or Allkem Shares, respectively, in each case whether by way of merger, amalgamation, scheme of arrangement (solely in the case of Allkem), share exchange, tender offer, exchange offer, recapitalization, consolidation, sale of equity or assets or otherwise, that in the good-faith determination of such party’s board of directors, after consultation with its financial and legal advisors, if consummated, would result in a transaction more favorable to such party’s stockholders than the transaction (after taking into account the time likely to be required to consummate such proposal, the sources, availability and terms of any financing, financing market conditions and the existence of a financing contingency, the likelihood of termination, the timing or certainty of closing, the identity of the person or persons making the proposal and any adjustments or revisions to the terms of the Transaction Agreement offered by the other party in response to such proposal or otherwise), after considering all factors such party’s board of directors deems relevant; |
• | “tantalum” refers to tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) and tantalum pentoxide bearing ore; |
• | “transaction” refers to the collective transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, including the merger and the scheme; |
• | “Transaction Agreement” refers to the Transaction Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2023, as amended by the Amendment to Transaction Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2023, and as may be further amended from time to time, among Livent, Allkem, NewCo and Merger Sub; |
• | “transaction consideration” refers to the merger consideration and the scheme consideration, collectively; |
• | “Treasury Regulations” refers to the U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code; |
• | “TSX” refers to the Toronto Stock Exchange; |
• | “U.K.” refers to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; and |
• | “U.S.” refers to the United States of America. |
Q: | Why am I receiving this proxy statement/prospectus and proxy card? |
Q: | How does the Livent Board recommend that I vote at the Livent Special Meeting? |
A: | The Livent Board unanimously recommends that Livent stockholders vote “FOR” the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal, “FOR” the Livent Advisory Compensation Proposal, “FOR” the NewCo Advisory Governance Documents Proposals and “FOR” the Livent Adjournment Proposal. See the section entitled “The Transaction—Recommendation of the Livent Board; Livent’s Reasons for the Transaction” beginning on page 93 of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
Q: | What is the vote required to approve each proposal at the Livent Special Meeting? |
A: | Approval of the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Livent Shares entitled to vote on the proposal. Because the affirmative vote required to approve the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal is based upon the total number of outstanding Livent Shares, if you fail to submit a proxy or vote virtually at the Livent Special Meeting, you abstain or you do not provide your bank, broker or other nominee with instructions, as applicable, this will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal. |
Q: | Does my vote matter? |
A: | Yes. The transaction cannot be completed unless the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal is approved by the Livent stockholders. For Livent stockholders, if you fail to submit a proxy or vote virtually at the Livent Special Meeting, or vote to abstain, or you do not provide your bank, broker or other nominee with instructions, as applicable, this will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal. |
Q: | What will I receive if the transaction is completed? |
A: | If the transaction is completed, each outstanding Livent Share (other than Livent Shares held as treasury stock by Livent or Livent Shares held by any of its subsidiaries) will be converted into the right to receive 2.406 NewCo Shares. The issuance of the NewCo Shares to holders of Livent Shares will be registered with the SEC and the NewCo Shares are expected to be listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “ALTM.” See the section entitled “The Transaction Agreement—Merger Consideration” beginning on page 139 of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
Q: | What equity stakes will former Livent stockholders and former Allkem shareholders hold in NewCo? |
A: | Under the Transaction Agreement and based on the Merger Exchange Ratio of Livent Shares for NewCo Shares, the Scheme Exchange Ratio of Allkem Shares for NewCo Shares or CDIs, and Allkem’s and Livent’s respective fully diluted shares as of the date of the Transaction Agreement, it is expected that Livent stockholders will own approximately 44%, and Allkem shareholders will own approximately 56%, respectively, of NewCo immediately following the effective time. |
Q: | What is the value of a NewCo Share? |
A: | Prior to the effective time, there has not been and will not be an established public trading market for NewCo Shares, and the market price of NewCo Shares will be unknown until the commencement of trading following the effective time. The NewCo Shares will reflect the combination of Livent and Allkem based upon the respective exchange ratios for Allkem Shares and Livent Shares, which, in the case of Allkem is one NewCo Share or one CDI for each Allkem Share, and in the case of Livent is 2.406 NewCo Shares for each Livent Share. The exchange ratios are fixed and will not fluctuate up or down based on the market price of Livent Shares, the market price of Allkem Shares or changes in currency exchange rates prior to the completion of the transaction. |
Q: | After the transaction, where can I trade my NewCo Shares? |
A: | At and as of the closing of the transaction, it is expected that the NewCo Shares will be listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “ALTM.” |
Q: | What will holders of Livent equity awards receive in the transaction? |
A: | Upon completion of the merger, outstanding Livent equity awards will be treated as follows: |
• | Livent RSUs. At the effective time, each Livent RSU will be assumed by NewCo and will be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to the related Livent RSU immediately prior to the effective time, except that the Livent Shares subject to such Livent RSUs will be converted into the right to receive, upon vesting, a number of NewCo Shares equal to the product of (A) the number of Livent Shares underlying such Livent RSUs immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by (B) 2.406. Following such assumption, each assumed Livent RSU that is unvested and outstanding as of the date of signing of the Transaction Agreement will vest on a pro rata basis and, to the extent of such vesting, will be exchanged into the right to receive the merger consideration at the effective time or as soon as practicable thereafter. |
• | Livent PSUs. At the effective time, each Livent PSU will fully vest, with the number of Livent Shares subject to such Livent PSUs determined based on the achievement of the higher of target and actual performance. At the effective time or as soon as practicable thereafter, each Livent PSU will be canceled in exchange for the right to receive the merger consideration. |
• | Livent Options. At the effective time, each Livent Option will be assumed by NewCo and will be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to the related Livent Option immediately prior to the effective time, except that (x) each such assumed Livent Option will be converted into a stock option to acquire a number of NewCo Shares equal to the product of (A) the number of Livent Shares underlying such assumed Livent Options immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by (B) 2.406; and (y) the exercise price per NewCo Share will be equal to the product of (A) the original exercise price per Livent Share when such assumed Livent Option was granted, divided by (B) 2.406. |
• | Livent Director RSUs. Immediately prior to the effective time, any Livent Director RSUs will vest in full and be cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to (A) the number of Livent Shares subject to such Livent Director RSUs immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by (B) the higher of (i) the first available closing price of the merger consideration and (ii) the closing price per Livent Share as reported in the New York Stock Exchange, on the last trading day preceding the closing date. |
Q: | Do any of the Livent directors or executive officers have interests in the transaction that may differ from or be in addition to my interests as a Livent stockholder? |
A: | Livent’s directors and executive officers have certain interests in the transaction that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Livent stockholders generally. These interests include, among other things: |
• | for Livent’s non-employee directors, the treatment of outstanding Livent Director RSUs, which will vest in full and be cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash. The estimated amount that would be realized by each of Livent’s eight non-employee directors in respect of his or her unvested outstanding Livent Director RSUs if the transaction were to be completed on November 30, 2023 is $127,535. Livent’s non-employee directors only hold Livent Director RSUs and do not hold any other types of equity incentive awards; |
• | for Livent’s executive officers, the treatment of outstanding equity awards described in the section entitled “The Transaction—Interests of Livent’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Transaction—Treatment of Livent Equity Awards” beginning on page 109 of this proxy statement/prospectus; based on the assumptions described thereunder, the estimated aggregate value of accelerated equity awards that would be realized by each of Messrs. Paul W. Graves and Gilberto Antoniazzi and Ms. Sara Ponessa is $6,165,407, $1,607,455 and $1,171,701, respectively; for a detailed breakdown of each executive officer’s holding of the equity awards, please see the tabular disclosure under such section; |
• | for each of Livent’s executive officers, the entitlement to receive certain severance benefits under their individual executive severance agreements with Livent upon a termination of employment by Livent without “cause” or by such individual for “good reason,” in each case within the 24-month period following a “change in control” of Livent; the estimated aggregate value of severance benefits that would be provided to each of Messrs. Graves and Antoniazzi and Ms. Ponessa in connection with such a termination is $12,938,249, $5,200,467 and $3,133,436, respectively; |
• | for each of Mr. Antoniazzi and Ms. Ponessa, the entitlement to receive a cash retention bonus payment in the amount of $250,000 under a retention program established in connection with the transaction, as described in the section entitled “The Transaction—Interests of Livent’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Transaction—Livent Retention Program” beginning on page 109 of this proxy statement/prospectus; and |
• | continued indemnification and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. |
Q: | Will my NewCo Shares acquired in the transaction receive a dividend? |
A: | Once you exchange your Livent Shares after the closing of the transaction, as a holder of NewCo Shares, you will receive the same dividends on NewCo Shares that all other holders of NewCo Shares or CDIs will receive with any dividend record date that occurs after the transaction is completed. Any dividend payments will be made at the discretion of the board of directors of NewCo and will depend upon many factors, including the financial condition of NewCo, earnings, legal requirements, applicable restrictions in debt agreements that limit the ability to pay dividends to stockholders and other factors the board of directors of NewCo may deem relevant. See “Description of NewCo Shares — Dividends” for more information on NewCo’s dividend policy. |
Q: | Will dividends paid by NewCo be subject to tax withholding? |
A: | Dividend Withholding Tax (“DWT”) (which is currently 25%) must be deducted from dividends paid by an Irish tax resident company such as NewCo, unless a shareholder is entitled to an exemption and has submitted a properly completed exemption form to NewCo’s registrar, Computershare Investor Services (Jersey) Limited. |
Q: | What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the transaction to U.S. holders of Livent Shares? |
A: | In connection with the filing of the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP (“Davis Polk”) has rendered to NewCo its opinion, dated [ ], to the effect that, based upon and subject to the assumptions, exceptions, limitations and qualifications set forth herein and in the federal income tax opinion filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part (including, for the avoidance of doubt, the assumption that market conditions between the date of such opinion and the effective time do not impact the relative valuation of Livent and Allkem for purposes of Treasury Regulations Section 1.367(a)-3(c) and Section 7874(a)(2)(B) of the Code), and representations from Livent, Allkem, and NewCo, (i) either (A) the merger will qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code, or (B) the merger and the scheme, taken together, will qualify as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code, (ii) the transfer of Livent Shares, other than certain excluded shares, by Livent stockholders pursuant to the merger (other than by any Livent stockholder who is a U.S. person and would be a “five-percent transferee shareholder” (within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.367(a)-3(c)(5)(ii)) of NewCo following the merger that does not enter into a five year gain recognition agreement in the form provided in Treasury Regulations Section 1.367(a)-8(c)) should qualify for an exception to Section 367(a)(1) of the Code (the tax treatment described in clauses (i) and (ii) together, the “Intended U.S. Shareholder Tax Treatment”) and (iii) the merger and scheme will not result in NewCo being treated as a “surrogate foreign corporation” within the meaning of Section 7874(a)(2)(B) of the Code or a “domestic corporation” pursuant to Section 7874(b) of the Code (the tax treatment described in this clause (iii), the “Intended Section 7874 Tax Treatment”, and together with the Intended U.S. Shareholder Tax Treatment, the “Intended U.S. Tax Treatment”). |
Q: | When is the transaction expected to be completed? |
A: | Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions described under the section entitled “The Transaction Agreement—Conditions That Must Be Satisfied or Waived for the Transaction to Occur” beginning on page 160 of this proxy statement/prospectus, including the approval of the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal by Livent stockholders at the Livent Special Meeting, Livent and Allkem expect that the transaction will be completed by the end of calendar year 2023. However, it is possible that factors outside the control of one or both companies could result in the transaction being completed at a different time or not at all. |
Q: | Who will serve on the NewCo board of directors following the transaction? |
A: | Upon the closing of the transaction, the board of directors of NewCo will be comprised of 12 members. Under the Transaction Agreement, the composition of the NewCo board of directors will be as follows: |
• | six current Allkem directors (each of whom will be nominated by Allkem prior to the scheme effectiveness, and including Mr. Peter Coleman, the current Chairman of the Allkem Board); and |
• | six current Livent directors (each of whom will be nominated by Livent prior to the scheme effectiveness, and including Mr. Paul W. Graves, the current Chief Executive Officer of Livent). |
Q: | Where will NewCo be located, where will NewCo be domiciled and who will serve in senior leadership roles following the transaction? |
A: | Following the transaction, NewCo and its subsidiaries will maintain a critical presence in the same locations from which Livent and Allkem currently operate and NewCo’s headquarters will be in North America in a location mutually determined by Livent and Allkem prior to the scheme effectiveness. NewCo is incorporated in the Bailiwick of Jersey, and is a resident of Ireland for tax purposes and expects to continue to be an Irish tax resident following the transaction. Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, the current Chairman of the Allkem Board, Mr. Peter Coleman, will assume the role of Chair of NewCo after the transaction, and Livent’s current Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Paul W. Graves, and its current Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Gilberto Antoniazzi, will assume the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of NewCo after the transaction. Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, the other executive leadership of NewCo as of the effective time were contemplated to be mutually determined by Livent and Allkem prior to the scheme effectiveness and the parties have since made this determination, including that Livent’s current General Counsel, Ms. Sara Ponessa, will assume the role of General Counsel of NewCo, as well as determining the rest of the broader senior management team of NewCo as of the effective time, consisting of an approximately equal split of employees from each of Allkem and Livent. For additional information on NewCo’s directors and executive officers, see “Management and Corporate Governance of NewCo” beginning on page 278 of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
Q: | How will my rights as a holder of NewCo Shares following the transaction differ from my current rights as a holder of Livent Shares? |
A: | Pursuant to the terms of the Transaction Agreement, immediately prior to the closing of the transaction, NewCo’s articles of association will be amended to be in substantially the applicable form attached as Annex B |
Q: | Who can vote at the Livent Special Meeting? |
A: | All holders of record of Livent Shares as of the close of business on [ ], 2023 (the “Merger Record Date”), the record date for the Livent Special Meeting, are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Livent Special Meeting. Each holder of Livent Shares is entitled to cast one vote on each matter properly brought before the Livent Special Meeting for each Livent Share that such holder owned of record as of the Merger Record Date. |
Q: | When and where is the Livent Special Meeting? |
A: | The Livent Special Meeting of Livent stockholders will be a virtual meeting conducted exclusively via live webcast online starting at [ : ] a.m. Eastern time (with log-in beginning at [ : ] a.m. Eastern time) on [ ], 2023. Livent stockholders will be able to attend the Livent Special Meeting online only and vote shares electronically at the meeting by going to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/LTHM2023SM and entering the 16-digit control number included on the proxy card that Livent stockholders received. Because the Livent Special Meeting is completely virtual and being conducted via live webcast, Livent stockholders will not be able to attend the meeting in person. On or about [ ], Livent commenced mailing this proxy statement/prospectus and the enclosed form of proxy card to its stockholders entitled to vote at the Livent Special Meeting. For additional information about the Livent Special Meeting, see the section entitled “Information About the Livent Special Meeting” beginning on page 73 of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
Q: | Why am I being asked to consider and vote on a proposal to approve, in a non-binding, advisory vote, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Livent’s named executive officers in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement? |
A: | Under SEC rules, Livent is required to seek a non-binding, advisory vote with respect to the compensation that may be paid or become payable to its named executive officers in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement. |
Q: | Why am I being asked to consider and vote on a proposal to approve, in non-binding, advisory votes, certain provisions of the NewCo articles of association? |
A: | Under SEC rules, Livent is required to seek a non-binding, advisory vote with respect to certain provisions of the NewCo articles of association that represent a change from the corresponding provisions of Allkem’s current governing documents. |
Q: | What will happen if Livent stockholders do not approve the transaction-related compensation or the amendments to the NewCo articles of association? |
A: | Approval of the Livent Advisory Compensation Proposal and the NewCo Advisory Governance Documents Proposals is not a condition to completion of the transaction. Accordingly, you may vote against any or all of these proposals and vote in favor of the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal. The Livent Advisory Compensation Proposal and the NewCo Advisory Governance Documents Proposals votes are each an advisory vote and will not be binding on Livent or NewCo following the transaction. If the transaction is completed, the transaction-related compensation may be paid to Livent’s named executive officers to the extent payable in accordance with the terms of their compensation agreements and arrangements even if Livent’s stockholders do not approve, in a non-binding, advisory vote, the Livent Advisory Compensation Proposal and the provisions of the NewCo articles of association will apply in accordance with their terms even if Livent’s stockholders do not approve, in non-binding, advisory votes, any or all of the NewCo Advisory Governance Documents Proposals. |
Q: | What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a beneficial owner? |
A: | If your Livent Shares are registered directly in your name with the transfer agent of Livent, EQ Shareowner Services, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those Livent Shares. As the shareholder of record, you have the right to vote, or to grant a proxy for your vote directly to Livent or to a third party to vote, at the Livent Special Meeting. |
Q: | If my Livent Shares are held in “street name” by my bank, broker or other nominee, will my bank, broker or other nominee automatically vote those shares for me? |
A: | No. If your Livent Shares are held in “street name” in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, your broker, bank or other nominee will only be permitted to vote your Livent Shares if you instruct it how to vote. You must provide your broker, bank or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your Livent Shares in order to vote. Please follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee. Please note that you may not vote Livent Shares held in street name by returning a proxy card directly to Livent, by voting by telephone or internet or by voting virtually at the Livent Special Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy,” which you must obtain from your broker, bank or other nominee. |
Q: | How many votes do I have? |
A: | Each Livent stockholder is entitled to one vote for each Livent Share held of record by such Livent stockholder as of the Merger Record Date. As of the close of business on the Merger Record Date, there were [ ] outstanding Livent Shares. |
Q: | What constitutes a quorum for the Livent Special Meeting? |
A: | The representation, present virtually or by proxy, of a majority of the Livent Shares issued and outstanding on the Merger Record Date and entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum. For purposes of the Livent Special Meeting, an abstention as to a particular matter occurs when either (a) a Livent stockholder affirmatively votes to “ABSTAIN” as to that matter or (b) a Livent stockholder attends the Livent Special Meeting and does not vote as to such matter. For purposes of the Livent Special Meeting, a failure to be represented as to particular Livent Shares and a particular matter occurs when either (a) the holder of record of such Livent Shares neither attends the virtual meeting nor returns a proxy with respect to such Livent Shares or (b) such Livent Shares are held in “street name” and the beneficial owner does not instruct the owner’s bank, broker or other nominee on how to vote such Livent Shares with respect to such matter (i.e., a broker non-vote). |
Q: | How do I vote my shares? |
A: | Stockholders of Record. |
• | By Mail. Mark the enclosed proxy card, sign and date it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope you have been provided. To be valid, your proxy by mail must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the day preceding the Livent Special Meeting. |
• | By Telephone. The toll-free number for telephone proxy submission can be found on the enclosed proxy card. You will be required to provide your assigned control number located on the proxy card. Telephone proxy submission is available 24 hours a day. If you choose to submit your proxy by telephone, then you do not need to return the proxy card. To be valid, your telephone proxy must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the day preceding the Livent Special Meeting. |
• | By Internet. The web address and instructions for internet proxy submission can be found on the enclosed proxy card. You will be required to provide your assigned control number located on the proxy card. Internet proxy submission via the web address indicated on the enclosed proxy card is available 24 hours a day. If you choose to submit your proxy by internet, then you do not need to return the proxy card. To be valid, your internet proxy must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the day preceding the Livent Special Meeting. |
• | Online During the Meeting. Livent stockholders of record may attend the virtual Livent Special Meeting by entering your assigned control number located on the proxy card and voting online; attendance at the virtual Livent Special Meeting will not, however, in and of itself constitute a vote or a revocation of a prior proxy. Livent requests that Livent stockholders submit their proxies by telephone or over the internet or by completing and signing the accompanying proxy card and returning it to Livent in the enclosed postage-paid envelope as soon as possible. When the accompanying proxy card is returned properly executed, the Livent Shares represented by it will be voted at the Livent Special Meeting in accordance with the instructions contained on the proxy card. |
Q: | How can I change or revoke my vote? |
A: | You have the right to revoke or change your proxy before it is voted at the Livent Special Meeting by: (i) sending a written notice of revocation to Livent Corporation, 1818 Market Street, Suite 2550, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Attention: Corporate Secretary, that is received by Livent prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the day preceding the Livent Special Meeting, stating that you would like to revoke your proxy, (ii) submitting a new proxy bearing a later date (by mail, telephone or internet, in accordance with the instructions on the enclosed proxy card) that is received by Livent prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the day preceding the Livent Special Meeting or (iii) attending the Livent Special Meeting, virtually, using your assigned control number and voting online. If you hold Livent Shares in “street name,” you should follow the instructions provided by your bank, broker or other nominee in order to change or revoke your vote. |
Q: | If a shareholder gives a proxy, how are the Livent Shares voted? |
A: | Regardless of the method you choose to vote, the individuals named on the enclosed proxy card will vote your Livent Shares in the way that you indicate. When completing the internet or telephone processes or the proxy card, you may specify whether your Livent Shares should be voted for or against, or you may abstain from voting on, all, some or none of the specific items of business to come before the Livent Special Meeting. |
Q: | What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials? |
A: | If you hold Livent Shares in “street name” and also directly as a record holder or otherwise or if you hold Livent Shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive more than one set of voting materials relating to the Livent Special Meeting. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card (or cast your vote by telephone or internet as provided on your proxy card) or otherwise follow the voting instructions provided in this proxy statement/prospectus in order to ensure that all of your Livent Shares are voted. If you hold your Livent Shares in “street name” through a bank, broker or other nominee, you should follow the procedures provided by your bank, broker or other nominee to vote your shares. |
Q: | What happens if I sell my Livent Shares before the Livent Special Meeting? |
A: | The Merger Record Date is earlier than both the date of the Livent Special Meeting and the effective time. If you transfer your Livent Shares after the Merger Record Date but before the Livent Special Meeting, you will, unless the transferee requests a proxy from you, retain your right to vote at the Livent Special Meeting but will transfer the right to receive the merger consideration to the person to whom you transfer your Livent Shares. In order to become entitled to receive the merger consideration you must hold your Livent Shares through the effective time, which Livent and Allkem expect will occur by the end of calendar year 2023, subject to satisfaction or waiver of closing conditions. |
Q: | Who will solicit and pay the cost of soliciting proxies? |
A: | Livent has engaged Morrow Sodali LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies for the Livent Special Meeting. Livent will pay Morrow Sodali LLC a base fee of $35,000 plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. The cost of the solicitation of proxies from Livent stockholders will be borne by Livent. Livent will reimburse brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable expenses incurred by them in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of Livent Shares. In addition to solicitations by mail, Livent’s directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies personally or by email or telephone without additional compensation. |
Q: | What do I need to do now? |
A: | After carefully reading and considering the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus, please vote promptly to ensure that your shares are represented at the Livent Special Meeting. If you hold your Livent Shares in your own name as the shareholder of record, you may submit a proxy to have your Livent Shares voted at the Livent Special Meeting in one of four ways (described in detail in the response to the question “How do I vote my shares?”): |
• | by mail; |
• | by telephone; |
• | via the internet; or |
• | online during the Livent Special Meeting. |
Q: | Where can I find the voting results of the Livent Special Meeting? |
A: | The preliminary voting results will be announced at the Livent Special Meeting, if available. In addition, within four business days following certification of the final voting results, Livent will file the final voting results with the SEC on a Current Report on Form 8-K. |
Q: | Am I entitled to exercise appraisal or dissenters’ rights instead of receiving the merger consideration for my Livent Shares? |
A: | Under Section 262 of the DGCL, holders of Livent Shares are not entitled to exercise dissenters’ or appraisal rights in connection with the merger because Livent Shares are listed on the NYSE and holders of eligible Livent Shares are not required to receive consideration other than NewCo Shares, which are expected to be listed on the NYSE. |
Q: | Are there any risks that I should consider in deciding whether to vote for the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal? |
A: | Yes. You should read and carefully consider the risks described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 35 of this proxy statement/prospectus. You also should read and carefully consider the risk factors relating to Livent contained in the documents filed with the SEC that are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, including Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. |
Q: | What are the conditions to the completion of the transaction? |
A: | In addition to approval of the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal by Livent stockholders as described above, completion of the transaction is subject to the satisfaction of a number of other conditions, including conditions relating to receipt of the Allkem Shareholder Approval for the scheme under the Australian Corporations Act, expiration or earlier termination of any applicable waiting period and receipt of governmental consents, approvals and clearances, in each case, under antitrust and investment screening laws in certain applicable jurisdictions, approval of the Court under the Australian Corporations Act, approval from the NYSE of the listing of NewCo Shares to be issued in the transaction, approval from the ASX for the admission of NewCo as a foreign exempt listing and the approval for quotation of the CDIs to be issued in the transaction, accuracy of representations and warranties in the Transaction Agreement, compliance with covenants in the Transaction Agreement, confirmation (verbal or otherwise) from the ATO that either (i) there are no material impediments to or material issues to be resolved which may prevent the ATO from issuing the ATO Class Ruling or (ii) the ATO is prepared to issue the ATO Class Ruling, in a form and substance satisfactory to Allkem (acting reasonably), confirming that qualifying Australian resident Allkem shareholders will be eligible to choose rollover relief to the extent to which they receive NewCo Shares or CDIs in exchange for their Allkem Shares in connection with the scheme, and no events having occurred that would have a material adverse effect on Livent or Allkem. For a more complete summary of the conditions that must be satisfied or waived prior to completion of the transaction, see the section entitled “The Transaction Agreement—Conditions That Must Be Satisfied or Waived for the Transaction to Occur” beginning on page 160 of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
Q: | Is consummation of the transaction contingent upon any future approval by the holders of Allkem Shares? |
A: | Yes. In accordance with the terms of the Transaction Agreement and applicable law, Allkem must obtain shareholder approval for the scheme under the Australian Corporations Act. See “The Transaction—Regulatory Approvals” beginning on page 123 of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
Q: | What happens if the transaction is not completed? |
A: | If the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal is not approved by Livent stockholders or if the transaction is not completed for any other reason, Livent stockholders will not receive NewCo Shares for their Livent Shares. Instead, Livent will remain an independent public company, Livent Shares will continue to be listed and traded on the NYSE and registered under the Exchange Act and Livent will continue to file periodic reports with the SEC. If the Transaction Agreement is terminated, under specified circumstances, Livent may be required to pay Allkem a termination fee of $64.6 million and, under specified circumstances, Allkem may be required to pay Livent a termination fee of $64.6 million. See the section entitled “The Transaction Agreement—Termination Fee” beginning on page 165 of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
Q: | Who can help answer any other questions I have? |
A: | If you have additional questions about the transaction, need assistance in submitting your proxy or voting your Livent Shares or need additional copies of this proxy statement/prospectus or the enclosed proxy card, please contact Morrow Sodali, LLC, Livent’s proxy solicitor, by calling toll-free at (800) 662-5200 or via email at Livent@info.morrowsodali.com. |
• | the occurrence of any change, effect, event, development, matter, state of facts, series of events or circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the Transaction Agreement, including a termination of the Transaction Agreement under circumstances that could require Livent to pay a termination fee to Allkem or require Allkem to pay a termination fee to Livent; |
• | uncertainties related to the timing of the required regulatory approvals for the transaction and the possibility that Livent and Allkem may be required to accept conditions that could reduce the anticipated benefits of the transaction as a condition to obtaining such regulatory approvals; |
• | the inability to complete the transaction due to the failure to obtain Livent Stockholder Approval of the transaction; |
• | the inability to complete the transaction due to the failure to obtain Allkem Shareholder Approval of the scheme or approval of the Court under the Australian Corporations Act; |
• | the failure of the transaction to close for any other reason; |
• | the ability to implement integration plans for NewCo and the ability to recognize the anticipated growth and cost savings and other benefits of the transaction, and to do so at the cost, within the time and with the effort anticipated; |
• | the ability to effectively manage the newly combined business, including with respect to implementing the anticipated strategies and obtaining the estimated cost savings, value of certain tax assets, synergies and growth; |
• | the failure to realize expected synergies, efficiencies and cost savings from the transaction within the expected time period, if at all; |
• | the inability to meet expectations regarding the timing, completion and accounting and tax treatments with respect to the transaction; |
• | the transaction and requirements under the Transaction Agreement that could disrupt Allkem’s and Livent’s current or future plans, operations and relationships with customers; |
• | the potential difficulties in retention of any members of senior management of Livent and Allkem and any other key employees that NewCo intends to retain after the closing of the transaction; |
• | the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against NewCo, Allkem, Livent and/or others relating to the Transaction Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby; |
• | diversion of the attention of Livent’s and Allkem’s respective management from ongoing business concerns; |
• | limitations placed by the Transaction Agreement on the ability of Livent and Allkem to operate their respective businesses; |
• | the effect of the announcement of the transaction on Livent’s and Allkem’s business relationships, employees, suppliers, vendors, other partners, standing with local communities, regulators and other government officials, operating results and businesses generally; |
• | the value of NewCo Shares and CDIs to be issued in the transaction, including risks relating thereto that have historically not affected the market price for Livent Shares or Allkem Shares individually; |
• | the amount of any costs, fees, expenses, impairments and charges relating to the transaction; |
• | factors that affect demand for, or the prices of, lithium and other commodities; |
• | physical risks inherent in Allkem’s and Livent’s businesses and the mining industry generally, including those related to natural disasters, climate change and other environmental hazards; |
• | competitive pressures in and unanticipated changes relating to competitive factors in the industries in which Livent and Allkem operate or in related industries, including industries that utilize lithium products; |
• | the ability to reach the anticipated levels of production capacity at the respective operating assets and achieve steady state production at the development assets owned by Livent or Allkem or in which they have a financial interest; |
• | shortages or changes in availability, or increases in costs of, key supplies; |
• | changes in tax laws or interpretations that could increase the consolidated tax liabilities of Livent and Allkem, or that could affect the operations or financial performance of Livent and Allkem; |
• | NewCo’s financial controls and reporting systems, especially given the different legislation, governmental regulations and standards that Allkem and Livent are subject to; |
• | the impact of current future geo-political tensions, instability and events on Livent’s, Allkem’s and NewCo’s businesses and results; |
• | the potential challenges relating to compliance with the differing legal, political, social and regulatory requirements in the many jurisdictions in which Livent and Allkem operate and in which NewCo will operate; |
• | the impact of acquisitions and investments Livent, Allkem and NewCo have made or may make; |
• | changes in legislation or governmental regulations affecting Livent, Allkem, NewCo or any of their properties; |
• | NewCo’s governance, including in relation to its organization under Jersey law, as well as NewCo being an Irish tax resident; |
• | the parties’ international operations, which are subject to the risks of currency fluctuations and foreign exchange controls; and |
• | financial market conditions, including in the stock and credit markets, and international, national or local economic, social or political conditions that could adversely affect Livent, Allkem or NewCo, or their respective customers, suppliers and vendors. |
• | Mt Cattlin lithium spodumene mine in Ravensthorpe, Western Australia; |
• | Olaroz lithium facility in Jujuy Province, Argentina (of which Allkem owns a 66.5% equity interest); |
• | Cauchari lithium brine project in Jujuy Province, Argentina; |
• | Sal de Vida lithium brine project in Catamarca Province, Argentina; |
• | James Bay lithium spodumene project in Québec, Canada; and |
• | Naraha lithium hydroxide plant in Naraha, Japan (of which Allkem owns a 75% economic interest). |
• | “FOR” the adoption of the Transaction Agreement and approval of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger; |
• | “FOR” the approval of, in a non-binding, advisory vote, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Livent’s named executive officers in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement; |
• | “FOR” the approval of, in non-binding, advisory votes, certain provisions of the NewCo articles of association; and |
• | “FOR” the approval to adjourn the Livent Special Meeting. |
• | the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal; |
• | the Livent Advisory Compensation Proposal; |
• | the NewCo Advisory Governance Documents Proposals; and |
• | the Livent Adjournment Proposal. |
• | Livent RSUs. At the effective time, each Livent RSU will be assumed by NewCo and will be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to the related Livent RSU immediately prior to the effective time, except that the Livent Shares subject to such Livent RSUs will be converted into the right to receive, upon vesting, a number of NewCo Shares equal to the product of (A) the number of Livent Shares underlying such Livent RSUs immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by (B) 2.406. Following such assumption, each assumed Livent RSU that is unvested and outstanding as of the date of signing of the Transaction Agreement will vest on a pro rata basis and, to the extent of such vesting, will be exchanged into the right to receive the merger consideration at the effective time or as soon as practicable thereafter. |
• | Livent PSUs. At the effective time, each Livent PSU will fully vest, with the number of Livent Shares subject to such Livent PSUs determined based on the achievement of the higher of target and actual performance. At the effective time or as soon as practicable thereafter, each Livent PSU will be canceled in exchange for the right to receive the merger consideration. |
• | Livent Options. At the effective time, each Livent Option will be assumed by NewCo (each, a “Livent Assumed Option”). Each Livent Assumed Option (whether vested or unvested) will be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to the related Livent Option immediately prior to the effective time, except that (x) each such Livent Assumed Option will be converted into a stock option to acquire a number of NewCo Shares equal to the product of (A) the number of Livent Shares underlying such Livent Assumed Options immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by (B) 2.406; and (y) the exercise price per NewCo Share will be equal to the product of (A) the original exercise price per Livent Share when such Livent Assumed Option was granted, divided by (B) 2.406. |
• | Livent Director RSUs. Immediately prior to the effective time, any Livent Director RSU will vest in full and be cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to (A) the number of Livent Shares subject to such Livent Director RSUs immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by (B) the higher of (i) the first available closing price of the merger consideration and (ii) the closing price per Livent Share as reported in the NYSE on the last trading day preceding the closing date. |
• | as at 8:00 a.m. AWST on the sanction date, each of the conditions set out below (other than the conditions in the second and third bullets below) has been satisfied or waived (where permitted); |
• | the approval by the Court (or any court of competent jurisdiction on appeal therefrom) (without material modification) of the scheme pursuant to Section 411(4)(b) of the Australian Corporations Act; |
• | the lodging by Allkem of an office copy of the Court orders approving the scheme under Section 411(4)(b) of the Australian Corporations Act with ASIC; |
• | the closing of the merger being capable of occurring, and would reasonably be expected to occur, as promptly as practicable following implementation of the scheme, meaning no applicable impediments under the terms of the Transaction Agreement exist or are foreseen such that there is any possibility that the scheme implementation and the merger closing do not occur around the same time, noting that the only condition to the merger occurring is the occurrence of the scheme implementation; |
• | the Allkem Shareholder Approval being duly obtained at the scheme meeting (or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in each case at which a vote on such approval was taken); |
• | the Livent Stockholder Approval being duly obtained at the Livent Special Meeting (or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in each case at which a vote on such approval was taken); |
• | (i) the NYSE having approved the listing of the NewCo Shares to be issued to the holders of Livent Shares and the NewCo Shares, including the NewCo Shares underlying the CDIs, to be issued to holders of Allkem Shares pursuant to the transaction, subject to official notice of issuance, and (ii) the ASX having provided approval for the admission of NewCo as a foreign exempt listing to the official list of ASX and the approval for official quotation of the CDIs, whether or not such approval is subject to conditions; |
• | all applicable governmental consents under specified antitrust and investment screening laws, in each case on any terms described in the Transaction Agreement (as the list may be amended with the written consent of Livent and Allkem) must have been obtained or made (as applicable) and remain in full force and effect and all applicable waiting periods (including any extensions by agreement or operation of law) applicable to the scheme and the merger with respect thereto must have expired, lapsed or been terminated (as applicable); |
• | the registration statement on Form S-4 of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part must have become effective under the Securities Act and must not be the subject of any stop order (which has not been withdrawn) or proceedings initiated by the SEC seeking any stop order; |
• | (i) no governmental entity of a competent jurisdiction will have issued any order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) that is in effect and restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the consummation of the transaction and (ii) no governmental entity having jurisdiction over any party shall have adopted any law that is in effect and makes consummation of the transaction illegal or otherwise prohibited (it being understood that if any such law arises out of or relates to antitrust laws or investment screening laws, the presence of such law will only be a failure to meet a condition to the scheme implementation to the extent the violation or contravention of such law as in effect would reasonably be expected to result in criminal liability to any person, personal liability to any director or officer of Allkem, Merger Sub, NewCo, Livent or any of their respective subsidiaries, or a material adverse effect on NewCo and its subsidiaries following the effective time); and |
• | at 8:00 a.m. AWST on the sanction date, neither the Transaction Agreement nor the deed poll having been terminated in accordance with its terms. |
• | the representations and warranties of Livent are true and correct to the extent required by, and subject to the applicable materiality standards set forth in, the Transaction Agreement, together with the receipt by Allkem of a certificate executed by Livent’s Chief Executive Officer to such effect; |
• | each of Livent and the NewCo Parties have in all material respects performed the obligations and complied with the covenants required to be performed or complied with by it under the Transaction Agreement, together with the receipt by Allkem of a certificate executed by Livent’s Chief Executive Officer to such effect; |
• | there has been no material adverse effect with respect to Livent; |
• | the Independent Expert will have issued the IER, which concludes that the scheme is in the best interest of Allkem shareholders and the Independent Expert does not change, withdraw or qualify its conclusion in any written update to its IER or withdraw the IER; and |
• | Allkem will have received confirmation (verbal or otherwise) from the ATO that either (i) there are no material impediments to or material issues to be resolved which may prevent the ATO from issuing the ATO Class Ruling or (ii) the ATO is prepared to issue the ATO Class Ruling, in a form and substance satisfactory to Allkem (acting reasonably), confirming that qualifying Australian resident Allkem shareholders will be eligible to choose rollover relief to the extent to which they receive NewCo Shares or CDIs in exchange for their Allkem Shares in connection with the scheme. Should an ATO Class Ruling not be available for all qualifying Australian resident Allkem shareholders, an ATO Class Ruling that includes (or would include, when issued) a confirmation that qualifying Australian resident shareholders who hold their shares on capital account are eligible to claim rollover relief will be deemed acceptable to Allkem. |
• | the representations and warranties of Allkem are true and correct to the extent required by, and subject to the applicable materiality standards set forth in, the Transaction Agreement, together with the receipt by Livent of a certificate executed by Allkem’s Chief Executive Officer to such effect; |
• | Allkem has in all material respects performed the obligations and complied with the covenants required to be performed or complied with by it under the Transaction Agreement, together with the receipt by Livent of a certificate executed by Allkem’s Chief Executive Officer to such effect; |
• | there has been no material adverse effect with respect to Allkem; and |
• | Livent shall have sought and received an opinion of Davis Polk, or, if Davis Polk is unable or unwilling to provide such opinion, Sidley Austin, dated as of the sanction date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Livent, to the effect that, on the basis of facts, representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion and as of the date thereof, (i) either (A) the merger should qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code or (B) the merger and the scheme, taken together, should qualify as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code, and (ii) the transfer of Livent Shares (other than certain excluded shares) by Livent stockholders pursuant to the merger (other than by any Livent stockholder who is a U.S. person and would be a “five-percent transferee shareholder” (within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.367(a)-3(c)(5)(ii)) of NewCo following the merger that does not enter into a five-year gain recognition agreement in the form provided in Treasury Regulations Section 1.367(a)-8(c)) should qualify for an exception to Section 367(a)(1) of the Code. |
• | change, withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify, or publicly propose or announce any intention to change, withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify in a manner adverse to the other party, its recommendation to its stockholders that they approve the Transaction Agreement (in the case of Livent) and vote in favor of the scheme (in the case of Allkem) (in the case of Livent, the “Livent Board Recommendation,” and in the case of Allkem, the “Allkem Board Recommendation,” and each as applicable, a “Board Recommendation”); |
• | fail to include its Board Recommendation in this proxy statement/prospectus, in the case of Livent, or the scheme booklet, in the case of Allkem; |
• | approve, adopt, endorse or recommend, or publicly propose or announce any intention to approve, adopt, endorse or recommend, any Competing Proposal; |
• | publicly agree or propose to enter into, any agreement in principle, letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, term sheet, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement or other agreement, in each case of the foregoing relating to a Competing Proposal (other than a confidentiality agreement as provided for in the Transaction Agreement); |
• | in the case of Livent only, in the case of a Competing Proposal that is structured as a tender offer or exchange offer pursuant to the Exchange Act for outstanding Livent Shares (other than by Allkem or an affiliate of Allkem), fail to recommend, in a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9, against acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by its stockholders on or prior to the earlier of (A) three business days prior to the date the Livent Special Meeting is held, including adjournments (or promptly after commencement of such tender offer or exchange offer if commenced on or after the third business day prior to the date the Livent Special Meeting is held, including adjournments) or (B) ten business days (as such term is used in Rule 14d-9 of the Exchange Act) after commencement of such tender offer or exchange offer; or |
• | cause or permit it to enter into an alternative acquisition agreement (together with any of the actions set forth in the first through fourth bullets above and, only in the case of Livent, the fifth bullet above, a “Change of Recommendation”). |
• | by either Livent or Allkem: |
• | if the Allkem Shareholder Approval is not obtained at the scheme meeting, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in each case at which a vote on such approval was taken (the “Allkem Shareholder Approval Failure Termination Right”); |
• | if the Livent Stockholder Approval is not obtained at the Livent Special Meeting, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in each case at which a vote on such approval was taken (the “Livent Stockholder Approval Failure Termination Right”); or |
• | if the Court declines or refuses to make any orders directing Allkem to convene the scheme meeting or declines or refuses to approve the scheme, and either (x) no appeal of the Court’s decision is made, or (y) on appeal, a court of competent jurisdiction issues a final and non-appealable ruling upholding the declination or refusal (as applicable) of the Court, and such outcome was not principally caused by a material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement set forth in the Transaction Agreement by the party seeking to terminate the Transaction Agreement. |
• | by Allkem: |
• | if Livent or a NewCo Party has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the Transaction Agreement, such that the conditions to Allkem’s obligation to consummate the transaction would not be satisfied (subject to Livent’s right to cure, and provided that Allkem is not then in breach) (the “Allkem Material Breach Termination Right”); |
• | prior to the receipt of the Allkem Shareholder Approval, if there has occurred an Allkem Change of Recommendation in connection with a Superior Proposal; provided that prior to or concurrently with such termination Allkem pays or causes to be paid to Livent the Allkem Termination Fee (as defined below) (the “Allkem Change of Recommendation Termination Right”); |
• | prior to the receipt of the Allkem Shareholder Approval, if there has occurred an Allkem Change of Recommendation in response to an Intervening Event; provided that prior to or concurrently with such termination Allkem pays or causes to be paid to Livent the Allkem Termination Fee (the “Allkem Intervening Event Termination Right”); |
• | prior to the receipt of the Allkem Shareholder Approval, if there has occurred an Allkem Change of Recommendation due to an Independent Expert Event; provided that, in the case such Independent Expert Event is caused by the existence of a Competing Proposal, prior to or concurrently with such termination Allkem pays or causes to be paid to Livent the Allkem Termination Fee (the “Allkem Independent Expert Event Termination Right”); or |
• | if, prior to the receipt of the Livent Stockholder Approval, (i) the Livent Board effects a Livent Change of Recommendation, or (ii) an intentional and material breach by Livent of the covenant relating to calling the Livent Special Meeting for the purpose of obtaining the Livent Stockholder Approval has occurred (the “Allkem Adverse Change Termination Right”); |
• | by Livent: |
• | if Allkem has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the Transaction Agreement, such that the conditions to Livent’s obligation to consummate the transaction would not be satisfied (subject to Allkem’s right to cure, and provided that Livent or a NewCo Party is not then in breach) (the “Livent Material Breach Termination Right”); |
• | prior to the receipt of the Livent Stockholder Approval, if there has occurred a Livent Change of Recommendation in connection with a Superior Proposal; provided that prior to or concurrently with such termination Livent pays or causes to be paid to Allkem the Livent Termination Fee (as defined below) (the “Livent Change of Recommendation Termination Right”); |
• | prior to the receipt of the Livent Stockholder Approval, if there has occurred a Livent Change of Recommendation in response to an Intervening Event; provided that prior to or concurrently with such termination Livent pays or causes to be paid to Allkem the Livent Termination Fee (the “Livent Intervening Event Termination Right”); or |
• | if, prior to the receipt of the Allkem Shareholder Approval, (i) the Allkem Board effects an Allkem Change of Recommendation, or (ii) an intentional and material breach by Allkem of the covenant relating to applying for an order of the Court pursuant to the Australian Corporations Act to convene the scheme meeting and otherwise taking required steps to cause the scheme meeting to be called for the purpose of obtaining the Allkem Shareholder Approval has occurred (the “Livent Adverse Change Termination Right”). |
• | by mutual written consent of Livent and Allkem; |
• | by either Livent or Allkem: |
• | if the scheme effectiveness has not occurred by 5:00 p.m. (AWST) on February 10, 2024 (subject to extension by either party until May 10, 2024 in order to obtain antitrust or investment screening law or other regulatory approvals), and such outcome was not principally caused by a material breach of certain covenants set forth in the Transaction Agreement by the party seeking to terminate the Transaction Agreement (the “End Date Termination Right”); or |
• | by either Livent or Allkem if (i) any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has issued a final and non-appealable order that is in effect and permanently restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the consummation of the merger or the scheme or (ii) any governmental entity having jurisdiction over a party has adopted a law that is in effect that permanently makes illegal or otherwise permanently prohibits the consummation of the merger or the scheme (and such outcome was not principally caused by a material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement set forth in the Transaction Agreement by the party seeking to terminate the Transaction Agreement). In the case of |
• | by Allkem pursuant to the Allkem Adverse Change Termination Right; |
• | by Livent pursuant to the Livent Change of Recommendation Termination Right or the Livent Intervening Event Termination Right; or |
• | (i) by either Livent or Allkem pursuant to the End Date Termination Right or the Livent Stockholder Approval Failure Termination Right, or by Allkem pursuant to the Allkem Material Breach Termination Right following an intentional and material breach of a covenant by Livent, (ii) prior to such termination but after the date of the Transaction Agreement, a bona fide Competing Proposal has been publicly made to Livent or any of its subsidiaries, has been made directly to the Livent stockholders generally or otherwise has become public or any person has publicly announced an intention (whether or not conditional) to make a bona fide Competing Proposal to Livent or, in the case of termination by Allkem pursuant to the Allkem Material Breach Termination Right, a Competing Proposal has been made publicly or privately to the Livent Board, and (iii) within 12 months after the date of a termination in either of the cases referred to in the preceding clauses (i) and (ii), Livent consummates a Competing Proposal or enters into a definitive agreement providing for a Competing Proposal (provided that solely for purposes of this bullet, all references to “20% or more” in the definition of “Competing Proposal” will be deemed to be references to “more than 50%”). |
• | by Livent pursuant to the Livent Adverse Change Termination Right (other than in the event such Allkem Change of Recommendation is due to an Independent Expert Event); |
• | by Allkem pursuant to the Allkem Change of Recommendation Termination Right, the Allkem Intervening Event Termination Right or, in certain circumstances, the Allkem Independent Expert Event Termination Right; or |
• | (i) by either Livent or Allkem pursuant to the End Date Termination Right or the Allkem Shareholder Approval Failure Termination Right, or by Livent pursuant to the Livent Material Breach Termination Right following an intentional and material breach of a covenant by Allkem, (ii) prior to such termination but after the date of the Transaction Agreement, a bona fide Competing Proposal has been publicly made to Allkem or any of its subsidiaries, has been made directly to the Allkem shareholders generally or otherwise has become public or any person has publicly announced an intention (whether or not conditional) to make a bona fide Competing Proposal to Allkem or, in the case of termination by Livent pursuant to the Livent Material Breach Termination Right, a Competing Proposal has been made publicly or privately to the Allkem Board, and (iii) within 12 months after the date of a termination in either of the cases referred to in the preceding clauses (i) and (ii), Allkem consummates a Competing Proposal or enters into a definitive agreement providing for a Competing Proposal (provided that solely for purposes of this bullet, all references to “20% or more” in the definition of “Competing Proposal” will be deemed to be references to “more than 50%”). |
• | managing a significantly larger company; |
• | coordinating geographically dispersed organizations; |
• | the potential diversion of management focus and resources from other strategic opportunities and from operational matters; |
• | aligning and executing the strategy of the combined company; |
• | retaining existing customers and attracting new customers; |
• | maintaining employee morale and retaining key management and other employees; |
• | integrating two business cultures, which may prove to be incompatible; |
• | coordinating the work of an integrated workforce and certain third party vendors; |
• | the possibility of faulty assumptions underlying expectations regarding the integration of certain operations; |
• | consolidating certain corporate and administrative infrastructures and eliminating duplicative operations; |
• | consolidating sourcing and procurement logistics with respect to key raw materials; |
• | challenges inherent in ensuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations across a greater number of jurisdictions; |
• | unforeseen expenses or delays associated with the transaction; and |
• | any actions that may be required in connection with obtaining regulatory approvals (or complying with conditions attaching to any regulatory approvals). |
• | as a result of the risk factors listed in this proxy statement/prospectus; |
• | actual or anticipated fluctuations in NewCo’s operating results; |
• | reasons unrelated to operating performance, such as reports by industry analysts, investor perceptions, or negative announcements by NewCo’s customers or competitors regarding their own performance; |
• | regulatory changes that could impact NewCo’s business; and |
• | general economic and industry conditions. |
• | permit the NewCo board of directors to issue one or more series of preferred shares with rights and preferences designated by the NewCo board of directors; |
• | impose advance notice requirements for shareholder proposals and nominations of directors to be considered at shareholder meetings; |
• | limit the ability of shareholders to remove directors without cause; |
• | require that all vacancies on the NewCo board of directors be filled by the NewCo directors; and |
• | prohibit certain business combinations with an “interested” shareholder / member unless approved by the NewCo board of directors. |
• | Mt. Cattlin lithium spodumene mine in Ravensthorpe, Western Australia; |
• | Olaroz lithium facility in Jujuy Province, Argentina (of which Allkem owns a 66.5% equity interest); |
• | Cauchari lithium brine project in Jujuy Province, Argentina; |
• | Sal de Vida lithium brine project in Catamarca Province, Argentina; |
• | James Bay lithium spodumene project in Québec, Canada; and |
• | Naraha lithium hydroxide plant in Naraha, Japan (of which Allkem owns a 75% economic interest). |
1. | the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal; |
2. | the Livent Advisory Compensation Proposal; |
3. | the NewCo Advisory Governance Documents Proposals; and |
4. | the Livent Adjournment Proposal. |
1. | your bank, broker or other nominee will not be permitted to vote your Livent Shares on the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal, and this non-vote will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” this proposal; |
2. | your bank, broker or other nominee will not be permitted to vote your Livent Shares on the Livent Advisory Compensation Proposal, and this non-vote will have no effect on the vote count for this proposal; |
3. | your bank, broker or other nominee will not be permitted to vote your Livent Shares on the NewCo Advisory Governance Documents Proposals, and this non-vote will have no effect on the vote count for these proposals; and |
4. | your bank, broker or other nominee will not be permitted to vote your Livent Shares on the Livent Adjournment Proposal, and this non-vote will have no effect on the vote count for this proposal. |
1. | sending a written notice of revocation to Livent Corporation, 1818 Market Street, Suite 2550, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Attention: Corporate Secretary, that is received by Livent prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the day preceding the Livent Special Meeting, stating that you would like to revoke your proxy; |
2. | submitting a new proxy bearing a later date (by mail, telephone or internet, in accordance with the instructions on the enclosed proxy card) that is received by Livent prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the day preceding the Livent Special Meeting; or |
3. | attending the Livent Special Meeting, virtually, using your assigned control number and voting online. |
• | the Livent Board’s belief that, after a thorough review, the transaction is more favorable to Livent’s stockholders than the potential value that might result from any other alternatives available, including remaining an independent company, or pursuing a significant acquisition or other business combination; |
• | the Livent Board’s expectations relating to the aggregate value of the NewCo Shares to be retained by Livent stockholders after giving effect to the combination of Livent’s and Allkem’s businesses, relative to the value of the Livent Shares on a standalone basis if Livent were not to engage in the transaction, including the fact that, following the transaction, Livent stockholders will have the opportunity to participate in the potential value created by combining Livent and Allkem and benefit from any increases in the value of NewCo Shares; |
• | the Livent Board’s belief that the combined company would create a leading global lithium chemicals producer with enhanced business-critical scale, including a presence in three major lithium geographies (i.e., the South American “lithium triangle,” Western Australia and Canada) and a combined lithium deposit that is among the largest in the world; |
• | the Livent Board’s belief that the combined company would be better able to serve the large and growing global customer base across EV and energy storage value chains, with strong customer relationships from both companies; |
• | the Livent Board’s expectation that the transaction will immediately increase global capabilities, scale and know how after the closing, which is business critical for the industry in which Livent operates; |
• | the Livent Board’s belief that, after a comprehensive analysis, the geographically complementary and relatively low-cost asset portfolios of Allkem will provide value to Livent’s stockholders; |
• | the Livent Board’s belief that the combined company would have a stronger financial profile with a strong combined balance sheet and cash flow generation that allows the delivery of accelerated growth plans; |
• | the Livent Board’s belief that the combined company would have a path to achieving anticipated production capacity of approximately 250 kMT of LCE by the end of calendar year 2027; |
• | the anticipated generation of estimated pre-tax cost synergies of approximately $125 million per year by 2027 (the majority of which is expected to be realized within three years of the transaction) (excluding the impact of approximately $40 million in estimated and non-recurring costs to achieve these synergies), with full run rate cost synergies of approximately $135 million per year by the end of 2032, and one-time capital expenditure savings of approximately $200 million by the end of 2025, mainly driven by asset proximity and co-development in Argentina and Canada, as well as savings at NewCo from operating model integration in the view of Livent’s management; |
• | the financial and other terms and conditions of the Transaction Agreement as reviewed by the Livent Board; |
• | the thoroughness of Livent’s due diligence examinations of Allkem and discussions with Livent’s management and financial and legal advisors; |
• | the fact that for United States federal income tax purposes, the merger is intended to qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, the merger and scheme, taken together, are intended to qualify as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code and an exception to Section 367(a) of the Code is expected to apply (assuming applicable holders enter into certain agreements with the IRS); |
• | that the fixed exchange ratio will not adjust downwards or upwards to compensate for changes in the price of Livent Shares or Allkem Shares prior to the consummation of the transaction and therefore provides certainty to Livent’s stockholders as to their pro forma percentage ownership of approximately 44% of the combined company, which is in line with the relative fundamental valuations and the premium paid in similar merger of equal transactions; |
• | the expected greater liquidity and continuity for investors, through a primary listing of NewCo Shares on the NYSE, on which the Livent Shares are currently listed, and a listing on the ASX to enable the trading of CDIs, and the potential inclusion in key S&P indices in the U.S. and the S&P / ASX 200 index in Australia (through pro rata CDI inclusion) based on the implied combined market capitalization of Livent and Allkem as well as other factors; |
• | information and discussions regarding the benefits of size and scale and the expected credit profile of the combined company and the expected pro forma effect of the proposed transaction on these factors; |
• | the opinion of Gordon Dyal & Co. rendered to the Livent Board, to the effect that as of May 10, 2023 and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion, the Merger Exchange Ratio is fair from a financial point of view to the holders of Livent Shares (other than certain excluded shares), as more fully described in the section below entitled “The Transaction—Opinion of Livent’s Financial Advisor” beginning on page 97 of this proxy statement/prospectus; |
• | the likelihood that the transaction will be consummated, based on, among other things: |
○ | the closing conditions to the transaction, which the Livent Board considered to be appropriately limited; and |
○ | the commitment made by Allkem and Livent in the Transaction Agreement to cooperate with each other and use their respective reasonable best efforts to obtain required regulatory approvals, including under the HSR Act, CFIUS laws and applicable foreign antitrust and investment screening laws (including, under certain circumstances and subject to specified limits, Allkem’s commitment to divest certain assets or commit to limitations on the business of Allkem to the extent provided in the Transaction Agreement), as discussed further under “The Transaction Agreement—Efforts to Obtain Required Approvals”; |
• | the terms and conditions of the Transaction Agreement and the course of negotiations of such agreement, including, among other things: |
○ | the ability of Livent, under certain circumstances, to provide information to and to engage in discussions or negotiations with a third party that makes an unsolicited alternative transaction proposal, as further described under “The Transaction Agreement—No Solicitation of Competing Proposals”; |
○ | the ability of the Livent Board, under certain circumstances, to change its recommendation to Livent’s stockholders concerning the transaction, as further described under “The Transaction Agreement—Board Change of Recommendation”; and |
○ | the ability of the Livent Board to terminate the Transaction Agreement under certain circumstances, subject to certain conditions (including payment of a termination fee to Allkem and certain rights of Allkem giving it the opportunity to match a superior proposal), as further described under “The Transaction Agreement—Termination of the Transaction Agreement”; |
• | the termination fee of $64.6 million payable to Allkem upon termination of the Transaction Agreement under specified circumstances is reasonable in light of, among other things, the benefits of the transaction to Livent stockholders and the likelihood that such a fee would not preclude or unreasonably restrict the emergence of a superior proposal, as well as the fact that generally no termination fee is payable by Livent to Allkem if Livent stockholders do not approve the Livent Transaction Agreement Proposal and the Livent Board has not changed its recommendation to Livent stockholders to vote for such proposal and Livent has not breached certain provisions of the Transaction Agreement; |
• | Livent would receive a termination fee of $64.6 million from Allkem in specified circumstances; |
• | the terms of the Transaction Agreement that restrict Allkem’s ability to solicit alternative transaction proposals and, subject to certain exceptions, to provide confidential due diligence information to, or engage in discussions with, a third party interested in pursuing an alternative transaction with Allkem, as further discussed under “The Transaction Agreement—No Solicitation of Competing Proposals”; |
• | the belief of the Livent Board that the end date (of February 10, 2024 (subject to extension by either party until May 10, 2024 in order to obtain required antitrust, investment screening or other regulatory approvals)) provisions of the Transaction Agreement allow for sufficient time to complete the transaction; |
• | the executive leadership arrangements contained in the Transaction Agreement, which provide that, after completion of the transaction, the existing Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Livent will hold the same positions in NewCo; and |
• | the governance arrangements contained in the Transaction Agreement, which provide that, after completion of the transaction, the NewCo board of directors will consist of 14 directors, seven of whom will be from the Livent Board (including Livent’s Chief Executive Officer) and will be nominated by Livent (the Transaction Agreement has since been amended to provide for 12 directors on the NewCo board of directors, but this remains evenly split between members of the Livent Board (including Livent’s Chief Executive Officer) and the Allkem Board). |
• | that the fixed exchange ratio implies a premium to Allkem shareholders based on the share prices of the two companies at the time of announcement and will not adjust upwards to compensate for changes in the price of Livent Shares or Allkem Shares prior to the consummation of the transaction; |
• | the restrictions on the conduct of Livent’s business during the pendency of the transaction, which may delay or prevent Livent from undertaking business opportunities that may arise or may negatively affect Livent’s ability to attract and retain key personnel; |
• | the terms of the Transaction Agreement that restrict Livent’s ability to solicit alternative transaction proposals and to provide confidential due diligence information to, or engage in discussions with, a third party interested in pursuing an alternative transaction, as further discussed under “The Transaction Agreement—No Solicitation of Competing Proposals”; |
• | the potential for diversion of management and employee attrition and the possible effects of the announcement and pendency of the transaction on customers and business relationships; |
• | the amount of time it could take to complete the transaction, including the fact that completion of the transaction depends on factors outside of Livent’s control, including regulatory approvals, approval of Allkem’s shareholders, and approval of the scheme by the Court, and that there can be no assurance that the conditions to the transaction will be satisfied even if the transaction is approved by Livent’s stockholders; |
• | the fact that Allkem would generally not be required to pay a termination fee if the Transaction Agreement is terminated due to regulatory impediments, the failure of Allkem shareholders to approve the transaction, or the failure of the Court to approve the scheme absent a material breach of the Transaction Agreement by Allkem; |
• | the possibility of non-consummation of the transaction and the potential consequences of non-consummation, including the potential negative impacts on Livent, its business and the trading price of the Livent Shares; |
• | the risk that the combined company could be treated as a U.S. corporation (and, therefore, a U.S. tax resident) for U.S. federal income tax purposes following closing pursuant to Section 7874 of the Code, including as a result of a change in applicable law with respect to Section 7874 of the Code or any other U.S. tax law, or official interpretations thereof, or a change in certain facts (including relative values); |
• | the risk that the IRS may assert that the combined company should be treated as a U.S. corporation (and, therefore, a U.S. tax resident) for U.S. federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 7874 of the Code; |
• | the challenges inherent in the combination of two business enterprises of the size and scope of Livent and Allkem and the cross-border nature of the combined company; |
• | the fact that Livent and Allkem have incurred and will continue to incur significant transaction costs and expenses in connection with the transaction, regardless of whether the transaction is consummated, and that these costs may be greater than anticipated; and |
• | the risks of the type and nature described under the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” |
1. | reviewed a draft of the Transaction Agreement dated May 9, 2023; |
2. | reviewed publicly available financial statements and other information of each of Livent and Allkem; |
3. | reviewed certain internal financial statements and other financial and operating information of each of Livent and Allkem, respectively; |
4. | reviewed Livent’s Adjusted Allkem Forecasts, as described further in the section entitled “—Unaudited Prospective Financial Information”; |
5. | reviewed the Livent Forecasts, as described further in the section entitled “—Unaudited Prospective Financial Information”; |
6. | reviewed the Projected Synergies, as described further in the section entitled “—Unaudited Prospective Financial Information”; |
7. | reviewed the Combined Forecasts, as described further in the section entitled “—Unaudited Prospective Financial Information”; |
8. | reviewed certain estimates of lithium reserves and resources for Allkem prepared by its management and third-party engineering firms, as adjusted and extrapolated by the management of Livent (which we refer to in this section as the “Allkem Resources Estimates”); |
9. | reviewed certain estimates of lithium reserves and resources for Livent prepared by its management and third-party engineering firms (which we refer to in this section, together with the Allkem Resources Estimates, as the “Resources Estimates”); |
10. | reviewed certain lithium price assumptions and the outlook for future lithium prices published by independent information service providers as well as real lithium price assumptions (including price sensitivity) provided by Livent management for lithium hydroxide, lithium carbonate and spodumene for use in the analysis (which we refer to in this section as the “Pricing Assumptions”); |
11. | discussed the past and current operations and financial conditions and prospects of Allkem and of Livent with senior executives of Livent; |
12. | compared the financial terms of the transaction with the publicly available financial terms of certain transactions which Gordon Dyal & Co. believed to be generally relevant; |
13. | reviewed the historical trading prices and trading activity for the Allkem Shares and Livent Shares; and |
14. | performed such other studies and analyses, reviewed such other information and considered such other factors as Gordon Dyal & Co. deemed appropriate. |
(in $ per share) | | | Livent NAV Per Share Based on Livent Projections | ||||||
| | Real Discount Rate | |||||||
Real Lithium Product Pricing Assumptions | | | 10.500% | | | 11.125% | | | 11.750% |
Livent Management | | | $49.56 | | | $46.44 | | | $43.62 |
Livent Management +20% | | | $64.08 | | | $60.07 | | | $56.44 |
Livent Management −20% | | | $34.98 | | | $32.75 | | | $30.73 |
(in $ billions) | | | Allkem NAVs Based on Livent’s Adjusted Allkem Forecasts | |||||||||||||||
| | Case A | | | Case B | |||||||||||||
| | Real Discount Rate | | | Real Discount Rate | |||||||||||||
Real Lithium Product Pricing Assumptions | | | 9.250% | | | 9.875% | | | 10.500% | | | 9.250% | | | 9.875% | | | 10.500% |
Livent Management | | | $13.3 | | | $12.4 | | | $11.6 | | | $14.0 | | | $13.0 | | | $12.1 |
Livent Management +20% | | | $18.3 | | | $17.0 | | | $15.9 | | | $19.1 | | | $17.8 | | | $16.6 |
Livent Management −20% | | | $8.4 | | | $7.8 | | | $7.2 | | | $8.8 | | | $8.1 | | | $7.5 |
(in $ per share) | | | | | | | Standalone Livent NAV / Share | | | Pro Forma Combined Company NAV / Share | |||||
| | Real Discount Rate | | | Livent’s Adjusted Allkem Forecasts | ||||||||||
Real Lithium Product Pricing Assumptions | | | Livent | | | Allkem | | | | | Case A | | | Case B | |
Livent Management | | | 11.125% | | | 9.875% | | | $46.44 | | | $49.54 | | | $50.74 |
| 10.500% | | | 9.250% | | | $49.56 | | | $53.13 | | | $54.45 | ||
| 11.750% | | | 10.500% | | | $43.62 | | | $46.38 | | | $47.46 | ||
| 11.750% | | | 9.250% | | | $43.62 | | | $50.33 | | | $51.65 | ||
| 10.500% | | | 10.500% | | | $49.56 | | | $49.16 | | | $50.24 | ||
Livent Management +20% | | | 11.125% | | | 9.875% | | | $60.07 | | | $65.75 | | | $67.44 |
Livent Management −20% | | | 11.125% | | | 9.875% | | | $32.75 | | | $33.26 | | | $33.96 |
| | Real Lithium Pricing Assumptions | | | Livent’s Adjusted Allkem Forecasts | | | Real Discount Rate | | | Relative Economic Contribution | | | Implied Exchange Ratio | |||||||
| Livent | | | Allkem | | ||||||||||||||||
NAV | | | Livent Management Pricing | | | Case A | | | 10.500% | | | 9.250% | | | 43.9% | | | 56.1% | | | 2.392x |
| 11.125% | | | 9.875% | | | 44.0% | | | 56.0% | | | 2.409x | ||||||||
| 11.750% | | | 10.500% | | | 44.2% | | | 55.8% | | | 2.427x | ||||||||
| Livent Management Pricing +20% | | | 10.500% | | | 9.250% | | | 42.5% | | | 57.5% | | | 2.262x | |||||
| 11.125% | | | 9.875% | | | 42.6% | | | 57.4% | | | 2.273x | ||||||||
| 11.750% | | | 10.500% | | | 42.7% | | | 57.3% | | | 2.283x | ||||||||
| Livent Management Pricing −20% | | | 10.500% | | | 9.250% | | | 46.6% | | | 53.4% | | | 2.671x | |||||
| 11.125% | | | 9.875% | | | 46.9% | | | 53.1% | | | 2.708x | ||||||||
| 11.750% | | | 10.50% | | | 47.3% | | | 52.7% | | | 2.746x | ||||||||
| Livent Management Pricing | | | Case B | | | 10.500% | | | 9.250% | | | 42.7% | | | 57.3% | | | 2.286x | ||
| 11.125% | | | 9.875% | | | 43.0% | | | 57.0% | | | 2.306x | ||||||||
| 11.750% | | | 10.500% | | | 43.2% | | | 56.8% | | | 2.326x | ||||||||
| Livent Management Pricing +20% | | | 10.500% | | | 9.250% | | | 41.4% | | | 58.6% | | | 2.160x | |||||
| 11.125% | | | 9.875% | | | 41.5% | | | 58.5% | | | 2.172x | ||||||||
| 11.750% | | | 10.500% | | | 41.6% | | | 58.4% | | | 2.184x | ||||||||
| Livent Management Pricing −20% | | | 10.500% | | | 9.250% | | | 45.5% | | | 54.5% | | | 2.561x | |||||
| 11.125% | | | 9.875% | | | 45.9% | | | 54.1% | | | 2.600x | ||||||||
| 11.750% | | | 10.500% | | | 46.3% | | | 53.7% | | | 2.641x |
• | certain non-public unaudited prospective financial information relating to Livent on a standalone basis for certain calendar years ending December 31, 2023 through 2062, prepared by Livent’s management (the “Livent Forecasts”); |
• | certain non-public unaudited prospective financial information relating to Allkem on a standalone basis for certain calendar years ending December 31, 2023 through 2067, prepared by Livent management, reflecting a single set of certain non-public unaudited prospective financial information relating to Allkem on a standalone basis provided by Allkem’s management to Livent and two cases of adjustments thereto made by Livent’s management, resulting in two separate Livent-adjusted cases (“Livent’s Adjusted Allkem Forecasts” or “Allkem Case A” and “Allkem Case B,” as applicable); |
• | certain non-public unaudited prospective pro forma combined financial information relating to NewCo for certain calendar years ending December 31, 2023 through 2067, prepared by Livent’s management, as the summation of the Livent Forecasts and Livent’s Adjusted Allkem Forecasts for each of Allkem Case A and Allkem Case B, with certain further adjustments as described below (the “Combined Forecasts”); and |
• | certain synergies projected to result from the transaction for certain calendar years ending December 31, 2023 through 2062, reflecting certain synergies projected to result from the transaction jointly developed by Livent’s and Allkem’s respective management, adjusted by Livent’s management to reflect Livent’s |
| | Real Lithium Product Pricing Assumptions (Uncontracted Volumes) | ||||||||||
(in $/ton) | | | | | 2023E | | | 2024E | | | 2025E onwards | |
Livent Management | | | Lithium Hydroxide | | | $65,000 | | | $35,000 | | | $25,000 |
| Battery Grade Lithium Carbonate | | | $50,000 | | | $30,000 | | | $22,000 | ||
| Technical Grade Lithium Carbonate | | | $46,000 | | | $26,000 | | | $18,000 | ||
| Spodumene | | | $4,250 | | | $2,500 | | | $1,900 | ||
| | | | | | | | |||||
Livent Management +20% | | | Lithium Hydroxide | | | $78,000 | | | $42,000 | | | $30,000 |
| Battery Grade Lithium Carbonate | | | $60,000 | | | $36,000 | | | $26,400 | ||
| Technical Grade Lithium Carbonate | | | $55,200 | | | $31,200 | | | $21,600 | ||
| Spodumene | | | $5,100 | | | $3,000 | | | $2,280 | ||
| | | | | | | | |||||
Livent Management −20% | | | Lithium Hydroxide | | | $52,000 | | | $28,000 | | | $20,000 |
| Battery Grade Lithium Carbonate | | | $40,000 | | | $24,000 | | | $17,600 | ||
| Technical Grade Lithium Carbonate | | | $36,800 | | | $20,800 | | | $14,400 | ||
| Spodumene | | | $3,400 | | | $2,000 | | | $1,520 |
| | Fiscal year ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 2023E | | | 2024E | | | 2025E | | | 2026E | | | 2027E | | | 2028E | | | 2029E | | | 2030E | | | 2031E | | | 2035E | | | 2040E | | | 2045E | | | 2050E | | | 2055E | | | 2060E | | | 2062E(4) | |
| | ($ amounts in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | | | $1,114 | | | $1,620 | | | $1,727 | | | $1,984 | | | $2,414 | | | $2,546 | | | $2,788 | | | $3,267 | | | $3,272 | | | $3,272 | | | $3,272 | | | $3,272 | | | $3,272 | | | $3,272 | | | $2,875 | | | — |
Adjusted EBITDA(1)(2) | | | $594 | | | $1,010 | | | $1,033 | | | $1,135 | | | $1,412 | | | $1,469 | | | $1,629 | | | $1,953 | | | $1,954 | | | $1,958 | | | $1,955 | | | $1,961 | | | $1,891 | | | $1,899 | | | $1,680 | | | — |
Unlevered free cash flow(1)(3) | | | $(104) | | | $40 | | | $252 | | | $689 | | | $778 | | | $952 | | | $1,152 | | | $1,335 | | | $1,478 | | | $1,478 | | | $1,474 | | | $1,461 | | | $1,428 | | | $1,431 | | | $1,289 | | | $492 |
(1) | This figure is a non-GAAP financial measure. |
(2) | Adjusted EBITDA is intended to reflect projected net income before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, further adjusted to exclude the impact of certain non-cash charges, such as remeasurement losses, and non-recurring charges, such as restructuring and similar charges and certain separation-related costs. |
(3) | Unlevered free cash flow is intended to reflect projected net cash provided by (used in) operating activities after deducting projected capital expenditures (including, in each case, the proportional share of such projected cash flows and capital expenditures from equity method investments) and adding back interest payments on financial liabilities. |
(4) | Represents a working capital release and mining closure costs (capital expenditures). |
| | Calendar year ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 2023E | | | 2024E | | | 2025E | | | 2026E | | | 2027E | | | 2028E | | | 2029E | | | 2030E | | | 2031E | | | 2035E | | | 2040E | | | 2045E | | | 2050E | | | 2055E | | | 2060E | | | 2065E | | | 2066E | | | 2067E(5) | |
| | ($ amounts in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | | | $1,449 | | | $1,304 | | | $1,622 | | | $2,196 | | | $2,932 | | | $3,699 | | | $4,324 | | | $4,044 | | | $4,178 | | | $4,224 | | | $4,294 | | | $3,252 | | | $2,699 | | | $2,699 | | | $2,699 | | | $2,297 | | | $252 | | | — |
Adjusted EBITDA(1)(2)(3) | | | $1,040 | | | $815 | | | $953 | | | $1,406 | | | $1,948 | | | $2,499 | | | $2,935 | | | $2,808 | | | $2,884 | | | $2,929 | | | $2,952 | | | $2,223 | | | $1,879 | | | $1,879 | | | $1,879 | | | $1,611 | | | $160 | | | — |
Unlevered free cash flow(1)(4) | | | $136 | | | $(460) | | | $(950) | | | $182 | | | $870 | | | $1,346 | | | $1,783 | | | $1,828 | | | $1,881 | | | $1,889 | | | $1,887 | | | $1,417 | | | $1,224 | | | $1,228 | | | $1,235 | | | $1,054 | | | $184 | | | $(21) |
(1) | This figure is a non-GAAP financial measure. |
(2) | Burdened for approximately $8-10 million of pre-tax right-of-use depreciation & amortization and interest on an attributable basis based on the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Amounts vary slightly on an annual basis. |
(3) | Adjusted EBITDA is intended to reflect projected net income before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, further adjusted to exclude the impact of certain non-cash charges, such as remeasurement losses, and non-recurring charges, such as restructuring and similar charges and certain separation-related costs. |
(4) | Unlevered free cash flow is intended to reflect projected net cash provided by (used in) operating activities after deducting projected capital expenditures (including, in each case, the proportional share of such projected cash flows and capital expenditures from equity method investments) and adding back interest payments on financial liabilities. |
(5) | Represents a working capital release and mining closure costs (capital expenditures). |
| | Calendar year ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 2023E | | | 2024E | | | 2025E | | | 2026E | | | 2027E | | | 2028E | | | 2029E | | | 2030E | | | 2031E | | | 2035E | | | 2040E | | | 2045E | | | 2050E | | | 2055E | | | 2060E | | | 2065E | | | 2066E | | | 2067E(5) | |
| | ($ amounts in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | | | $1,449 | | | $1,304 | | | $1,622 | | | $2,196 | | | $2,943 | | | $3,729 | | | $4,376 | | | $4,109 | | | $4,263 | | | $4,318 | | | $4,388 | | | $3,346 | | | $2,793 | | | $2,793 | | | $2,793 | | | $2,391 | | | $280 | | | — |
Adjusted EBITDA(1)(2)(3) | | | $1,040 | | | $815 | | | $953 | | | $1,416 | | | $2,034 | | | $2,616 | | | $3,066 | | | $2,949 | | | $3,037 | | | $3,090 | | | $3,112 | | | $2,383 | | | $2,039 | | | $2,039 | | | $2,039 | | | $1,772 | | | $228 | | | — |
Unlevered free cash flow(1)(4) | | | $135 | | | $(460) | | | $(1,079) | | | $107 | | | $916 | | | $1,400 | | | $1,847 | | | $1,920 | | | $1,982 | | | $1,997 | | | $1,995 | | | $1,526 | | | $1,333 | | | $1,338 | | | $1,345 | | | $1,166 | | | $222 | | | $(20) |
(1) | This figure is a non-GAAP financial measure. |
(2) | Burdened for approximately $8-10 million of pre-tax right-of-use depreciation & amortization and interest on an attributable basis based on the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Amounts vary slightly on an annual basis. |
(3) | Adjusted EBITDA is intended to reflect projected net income before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, further adjusted to exclude the impact of certain non-cash charges, such as remeasurement losses, and non-recurring charges, such as restructuring and similar charges and certain separation-related costs. |
(4) | Unlevered free cash flow is intended to reflect projected net cash provided by (used in) operating activities after deducting projected capital expenditures (including the proportional share from equity method investments) and adding back interest payments on financial liabilities. |
(5) | Represents a working capital release and mining closure costs (capital expenditures). |
| | Calendar year ending December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 2023E | | | 2024E | | | 2025E | | | 2026E | | | 2027E | | | 2028E | | | 2029E | | | 2030E | | | 2031E | | | 2035E | | | 2040E | | | 2045E | | | 2050E | | | 2055E | | | 2060 | | | 2062E | | | 2067E(5) | |
| | ($ amounts in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(2)(3) | | | $1,634 | | | $1,820 | | | $2,050 | | | $2,621 | | | $3,483 | | | $4,095 | | | $4,694 | | | $4,894 | | | $4,973 | | | $5,021 | | | $5,041 | | | $4,314 | | | $3,899 | | | $3,908 | | | $3,640 | | | $1,961 | | | — |
Unlevered free cash flow(2)(4) | | | $32 | | | ($327) | | | ($563) | | | $955 | | | $1,751 | | | $2,458 | | | $3,107 | | | $3,339 | | | $3,535 | | | $3,569 | | | $3,563 | | | $3,067 | | | $2,833 | | | $2,838 | | | $2,666 | | | $1,994 | | | $(21) |
(1) | Reflects the Projected Synergies. |
(2) | This figure is a non-GAAP financial measure. |
(3) | Adjusted EBITDA is intended to reflect projected net income before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, further adjusted to exclude the impact of certain non-cash charges, such as remeasurement losses, and non-recurring charges, such as restructuring and similar charges and certain separation-related costs. |
(4) | Unlevered free cash flow is intended to reflect projected net cash provided by (used in) operating activities after deducting projected capital expenditures (including the proportional share from equity method investments) and adding back interest payments on financial liabilities. |
(5) | Represents a working capital release and mining closure costs (capital expenditures). |
| | Calendar year ending December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 2023E | | | 2024E | | | 2025E | | | 2026E | | | 2027E | | | 2028E | | | 2029E | | | 2030E | | | 2031E | | | 2035E | | | 2040E | | | 2045E | | | 2050E | | | 2055E | | | 2060E | | | 2062E | | | 2067E(5) | |
| | ($ amounts in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(2)(3) | | | $1,634 | | | $1,820 | | | $2,050 | | | $2,631 | | | $3,568 | | | $4,212 | | | $4,826 | | | $5,035 | | | $5,126 | | | $5,183 | | | $5,202 | | | $4,475 | | | $4,061 | | | $4,069 | | | $3,801 | | | 2,122 | | | — |
Unlevered free cash flow(2)(4) | | | $31 | | | ($327) | | | ($692) | | | $881 | | | $1,797 | | | $2,513 | | | $3,173 | | | $3,433 | | | $3,639 | | | $3,680 | | | $3,674 | | | $3,179 | | | $2,946 | | | $2,952 | | | $2,780 | | | $2,111 | | | $(20) |
(1) | Reflects the Projected Synergies. |
(2) | This figure is a non-GAAP financial measure. |
(3) | Adjusted EBITDA is intended to reflect projected net income before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, further adjusted to exclude the impact of certain non-cash charges, such as remeasurement losses, and non-recurring charges, such as restructuring and similar charges and certain separation-related costs. |
(4) | Unlevered free cash flow is intended to reflect projected net cash provided by (used in) operating activities after deducting projected capital expenditures (including the proportional share from equity method investments) and adding back interest payments on financial liabilities. |
(5) | Represents a working capital release and mining closure costs (capital expenditures). |
• | Annual pre-tax cost synergies estimated at approximately $122 million expected to be achieved by the end of 2027 (the majority of which is expected to be realized within three years of the transaction) (excluding the impact of approximately $40 million in estimated non-recurring costs to achieve these synergies); |
• | Full run rate annual pre-tax cost synergies of approximately $135 million expected to be achieved by 2032; |
• | One time capital expenditure savings of approximately $200 million expected to be achieved by the end of 2025; |
• | Adjustments from Livent’s management to reflect Livent’s Adjusted Allkem Forecasts (which were reflected without input of Allkem), including adjustments to the assumptions underlying Allkem’s management’s projections for production volume, project launch and ramp timing, pricing and cost structure, among other things; and |
• | Operating model integration benefits, based on an assumption of integrating Livent’s operating model (which were developed by Livent’s management without input of Allkem). |
| | Calendar year ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 2024E | | | 2025E | | | 2026E | | | 2027E(4) | | | 2028E | | | 2029E | | | 2030E | | | 2031E | | | 2035E | | | 2040E | | | 2045E | | | 2050E | | | 2055E | | | 2060E | | | 2062E | | | 2067E | |
| | ($ amounts in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-Tax Cost Synergies(1) | | | $26 | | | $75 | | | $80 | | | $122 | | | $127 | | | $130 | | | $133 | | | $134 | | | $135 | | | $135 | | | $130 | | | $130 | | | $130 | | | $82 | | | $82 | | | — |
Costs to Achieve Pre-Tax Cost Synergies(1) | | | $(30) | | | $(10) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Capital expenditure Synergies(1)(2) | | | $112 | | | $87 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Operating Model Integration Savings (Allkem Case A)(3)(5) | | | $(14) | | | $3 | | | $30 | | | $18 | | | $72 | | | $83 | | | $83 | | | $83 | | | $105 | | | $105 | | | $95 | | | $87 | | | $86 | | | $82 | | | $208 | | | — |
Operating Model Integration Savings (Allkem Case B)(3)(6) | | | $(14) | | | $3 | | | $30 | | | $19 | | | $74 | | | $84 | | | $85 | | | $85 | | | $107 | | | $107 | | | $99 | | | $91 | | | $89 | | | $86 | | | $214 | | | — |
(1) | The cost and capital expenditure synergies are primarily a function of NewCo’s expected production volumes and cost structure. These jointly developed synergies were based on the financial models that each of Livent and Allkem shared with the other (prior to any adjustments made to the other management’s assumptions). |
(2) | Excludes impact of foregone depreciation. |
(3) | Developed by Livent’s management without input of Allkem. |
(4) | The number for 2027E that was jointly developed by Livent's and Allkem's respective management prior to adjustment by Livent's management to reflect Livent's Adjusted Allkem Forecasts was approximately $125 million. |
(5) | Represents an adjustment by Livent’s management for Allkem Case A to incorporate Livent’s optimized business operating model. |
(6) | Represents an adjustment by Livent’s management for Allkem Case B to incorporate Livent’s optimized business operating model. |
• | Livent RSUs. At the effective time, each Livent RSU will be assumed by NewCo and will be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to the related Livent RSU immediately prior to the effective time, except that the Livent Shares subject to such Livent RSUs will be converted into the right to receive, upon vesting, a number of NewCo Shares equal to the product of (A) the number of Livent Shares underlying such Livent RSUs immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by (B) 2.406. Following such assumption, each assumed Livent RSU that is unvested and outstanding as of the date of signing of the Transaction Agreement will vest on a pro rata basis and, to the extent of such vesting, will be exchanged into the right to receive the merger consideration at the effective time or as soon as practicable thereafter. |
• | Livent PSUs. At the effective time, each Livent PSU will fully vest, with the number of Livent Shares subject to such Livent PSUs determined based on the achievement of the higher of target and actual performance. At the effective time or as soon as practicable thereafter, each Livent PSU will be canceled in exchange for the right to receive the merger consideration. |
• | Livent Options. At the effective time, each Livent Option will be assumed by NewCo. Each Livent Assumed Option (whether vested or unvested) will be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to the related Livent Option immediately prior to the effective time, except that (x) each such Livent Assumed Option will be converted into a stock option to acquire a number of NewCo Shares equal to the product of (A) the number of Livent Shares underlying such Livent Assumed Options immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by (B) 2.406; and (y) the exercise price per NewCo Share will be equal to the product of (A) the original exercise price per Livent Share when such Livent Assumed Option was granted, divided by (B) 2.406. |
• | Livent Director RSUs. Immediately prior to the effective time, any Livent Director RSUs will vest in full and be cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to (A) the number of Livent Shares subject to such Livent Director RSU immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by (B) the higher of (i) the first available closing price of the merger consideration and (ii) the closing price per Livent Share as reported in the NYSE on the last trading day preceding the closing date. |
Person | | | Unvested Livent RSUs (#) | | | Unvested Livent RSUs ($) | | | Unvested Livent PSUs (#) | | | Unvested Livent PSUs ($) | | | Vested Livent Options (#) | | | Vested Livent Options ($) | | | Unvested Livent Options (#) | | | Unvested Livent Options ($) |
Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paul W. Graves | | | 145,347 | | | $3,687,453 | | | 42,781 | | | $1,085,354 | | | 647,886 | | | $8,174,752 | | | 320,793 | | | $1,392,600 |
Gilberto Antoniazzi | | | 37,855 | | | $960,381 | | | 10,996 | | | $278,969 | | | 133,724 | | | $1,467,755 | | | 84,291 | | | $368,105 |
Sara Ponessa | | | 27,665 | | | $701,861 | | | 8,479 | | | $215,112 | | | 53,334 | | | $446,406 | | | 59,510 | | | $254,728 |
Person | | | Unvested Livent RSUs (#) | | | Unvested Livent RSUs ($) | | | Unvested Livent PSUs (#) | | | Unvested Livent PSUs ($) | | | Vested Livent Options (#) | | | Vested Livent Options ($) | | | Unvested Livent Options (#) | | | Unvested Livent Options ($) |
Non-Employee Directors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pierre Brondeau | | | 5,027 | | | $127,535 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Michael F. Barry | | | 5,027 | | | $127,535 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
G. Peter D’Aloia | | | 5,027 | | | $127,535 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Christina Lampe-Önnerud | | | 5,027 | | | $127,535 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Pablo Marcet | | | 5,027 | | | $127,535 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Steven T. Merkt | | | 5,027 | | | $127,535 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Robert C. Pallash | | | 5,027 | | | $127,535 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Andrea E. Utecht | | | 5,027 | | | $127,535 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
• | An amount equal to three times (in the case of Messrs. Graves and Antoniazzi) and two times (in the case of Ms. Sara Ponessa, General Counsel and Secretary) the base salary, payable in a lump sum; |
• | An amount equal to three times (in the case of Messrs. Graves and Antoniazzi) and two times (in the case of Ms. Ponessa) the target annual incentive award, payable in a lump sum; |
• | A pro-rated annual incentive award for the year of termination; |
• | Reimbursement for outplacement services for a two-year period following the termination date, with the total reimbursements capped at 15% of base salary as of the termination date; |
• | Continuation of medical and welfare benefits (including life and accidental death and dismemberment and disability insurance coverage) for such individual (and covered spouse and dependents), at the same premium cost and coverage level as in effect as of the change in control date, for three years (in the case of Messrs. Graves and Antoniazzi) and two years (in the case of Ms. Ponessa) following the date of termination (or, if earlier, the date on which substantially similar benefits at a comparable cost are available from a subsequent employer) or, if such benefits continuation is not permissible under the applicable plan or would result in adverse tax consequences, cash benefits in lieu thereof under the executive severance agreements; and |
• | Continuation of retirement benefits for three years (in the case of Messrs. Graves and Antoniazzi) and two years (in case of Ms. Ponessa) following the date of termination of the annual company contribution made on the Livent executive officer’s behalf to Livent’s qualified retirement plan and Livent’s nonqualified retirement plan as in effect immediately prior to the date of the change in control (excluding any pre-tax or post-tax contribution authorized by such executive officer). |
• | that the effective time will occur on November 30, 2023 (which, as an illustration, is the assumed closing date of the merger solely for purposes of this golden parachute compensation disclosure); |
• | when calculating the amount received in connection with a “double trigger” termination, that each of Livent’s NEOs experiences a qualifying termination event as of the effective time that results in severance benefits becoming payable to him or her under the individual’s severance agreement with Livent without taking into account any possible reduction that might be required to avoid the excise tax in connection with Section 280G under Section 4999 of the Code; |
• | that the equity awards that were outstanding as of June 30, 2023 are the equity awards that Livent has granted to its NEOs through, and are outstanding as of, November 30, 2023; |
• | that the number of Livent Shares subject to Livent PSUs will be determined at target level of achievement; and |
• | that the price per Livent Share at the effective time is $25.37 (the average closing market price over the first five business days following the first public announcement of the transaction on May 10, 2023, as required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K). |
Named Executive Officers | | | Cash(1) | | | Equity(2) | | | Pension / NQDC(3) | | | Perquisites / Benefits(4) | | | Other(5) | | | Total |
Paul W. Graves | | | $5,946,959 | | | $6,165,407 | | | $608,017 | | | $88,866 | | | $129,000 | | | $12,938,249 |
Gilberto Antoniazzi | | | $2,495,158 | | | $1,607,455 | | | $692,021 | | | $88,334 | | | $317,500 | | | $5,200,467 |
Sara Ponessa | | | $1,462,126 | | | $1,171,701 | | | $132,486 | | | $58,623 | | | $308,500 | | | $3,133,436 |
(1) | Cash. As described in the section above entitled “—Existing Livent Executive Severance Agreements,” the amount shown is equal to (A) three times (and two times for Ms. Ponessa) the sum of base salary plus target annual incentive, calculated by using the highest annualized base salary and target annual incentive available to the NEO during his/her career with Livent; plus (B) the pro rata amount of any annual incentive award payable as of the effective time. |
(2) | Equity. As described in the section above entitled “—Treatment of Livent Equity Awards,” the amount shown represents the value of the Livent RSUs, Livent PSUs and Livent Options, calculated as follows: |
Named Executive Officers | | | Livent RSUs(a) | | | Livent PSUs(b) | | | Livent Options(c) | | | Value of All Equity Awards |
Paul W. Graves | | | $3,687,453 | | | $1,085,354 | | | $1,392,600 | | | $6,165,407 |
Gilberto Antoniazzi | | | $960,381 | | | $278,969 | | | $368,105 | | | $1,607,455 |
Sara Ponessa | | | $701,861 | | | $215,112 | | | $254,728 | | | $1,171,701 |
(a) | All unvested Livent RSUs will be assumed by NewCo and then vest on a pro rata basis upon the change in control, even if the NEO was not terminated. The amounts shown reflect the market value of the Livent RSUs calculated based on the stock price of $25.37 per share (the average closing market price over the first five business days following the first public announcement of the transaction on May 10, 2023), consisting of (i) for Mr. Graves: $2,264,515 that would accelerate on a “single-trigger” basis upon the change in control and an additional $1,422,938 that would accelerate on a “double-trigger” basis if the NEO is terminated within two years following the change in control due to either a termination by Livent or its applicable affiliate without “cause” or a resignation by the NEO with “good reason,” (ii) for Mr. Antoniazzi: $596,631 that would accelerate on a “single-trigger” basis and an additional $363,750 that would accelerate on a “double-trigger” basis and (iii) for Ms. Ponessa: $419,394 that would accelerate on a “single-trigger” basis and an additional $282,467 that would accelerate on a “double-trigger” basis. |
(b) | All unvested PSUs will accelerate in full at the better of target or actual performance upon the change in control. The amounts shown reflect the market value of the accelerated Livent PSUs assuming target performance, based on the stock price of $25.37 per share. |
(c) | All Livent Options will be assumed by NewCo upon the change in control. As disclosed above, each Livent Assumed Option will be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to the related Livent Option immediately prior to the effective time. No converted Livent Options vest at the effective time based solely on the closing of the merger. The amounts shown reflect the market value of the Livent Options that would accelerate on a “double-trigger” basis in the event that an NEO is terminated within two years following the change in control due to either a termination by Livent or its applicable affiliate without “cause” or a resignation by the NEO with “good reason,” calculated at a per share value of $25.37. The ultimate value of accelerated vesting for the foregoing options will depend on the stock price on the date of exercise. |
(3) | Pension/NQDC. The amount shown is equal to three times (and two times for Ms. Ponessa) the sum of the annual company contributions made on the NEO’s behalf to the Livent Savings and Investment Plan and the Livent Nonqualified Savings Plan. |
(4) | Perquisites / Benefits. Represents welfare benefits of health care and dental, life insurance and disability insurance continuation for three years (and two years for Ms. Ponessa). The amounts shown are the estimated cost to Livent for such benefits during the period. |
(5) | The amounts reported in this column reflect (A) the maximum amount that could be paid by Livent to the NEOs with respect to outplacement services and (B) the cash retention bonuses that will be payable to Mr. Antoniazzi and Ms. Ponessa (consisting of $250,000 for each of Mr. Antoniazzi and Ms. Ponessa). The NEOs are entitled to outplacement services, which are capped at 15% of the NEO’s base salary. The actual amounts paid in respect of such services will be determined based upon the outplacement services obtained, if any, by an NEO upon termination. The cash retention bonuses for Mr. Antoniazzi and Ms. Ponessa will be payable on the one-year anniversary of the closing of the merger, contingent upon their continued employment with the combined company or any applicable affiliate through the one-year anniversary of the closing of the merger or the prior termination of their employment by the combined company or any applicable affiliate without “cause.” For additional information on the retention bonus program, see the section above entitled “—Livent Retention Program.” |
• | If Role Not Made Redundant. On the date of scheme effectiveness, each outstanding and unvested Allkem Performance Right held by an employee of Allkem whose role is not being made redundant in connection with the transaction will vest in the proportion to be determined by the Allkem Board, with any performance conditions deemed to have been met. However, pursuant to the terms of the Transaction Agreement, no less than 60% and no more than 70% of the aggregate number of outstanding and unvested Allkem Performance Rights that are held by employees of Allkem whose roles are not being made redundant in connection with the transaction may vest on the date of scheme effectiveness. The vested Allkem Performance Rights will be exchanged for Allkem Shares prior to the Scheme Record Date and be eligible to receive the scheme consideration in connection with the scheme. The remaining outstanding and unvested Allkem Performance Rights will lapse and be of no further force or effect on the date of scheme effectiveness and, as soon as practicable following the date of scheme implementation, NewCo will grant replacement awards to the prior holders who are employees of NewCo, which replacement awards will (i) be substantially comparable in value to the corresponding lapsed Allkem Performance Rights as of immediately prior to the date of scheme effectiveness, (ii) be in respect of NewCo Shares and (iii) if the employment of the holder of a replacement award is terminated as a result of redundancy in the 12 months following the date of scheme implementation, vest in full upon such termination. |
• | If Role Made Redundant. On the date of scheme effectiveness, each outstanding and unvested Allkem Performance Right held by an employee of Allkem whose role is being made redundant in connection with the transaction will vest in the proportion to be determined by the Allkem Board, with any performance conditions deemed to have been met. Pursuant to the terms of the Transaction Agreement, up to 100% of the aggregate number of outstanding and unvested Allkem Performance Rights that are held by employees of Allkem whose roles are being made redundant in connection with the transaction may vest on the date of scheme effectiveness. The vested Allkem Performance Rights will be exchanged for Allkem Shares prior to the Scheme Record Date and be eligible to receive the scheme consideration in connection with the scheme. The remaining outstanding and unvested Allkem Performance Rights will lapse and be of no further force or effect on the date of scheme effectiveness. |
| | Percentage of Allkem Performance Rights that will vest on the date of scheme effectiveness: | |||||||
| | Allkem Performance Rights issued for Fiscal Year 2022 | | | Allkem Performance Rights issued for Fiscal Year 2023 | | | Allkem Performance Rights issued for Fiscal Year 2024 | |
Management Long-Term Incentive Program Allkem Performance Rights (with vesting based on base production capacity) | | | 98% | | | 100% | | | 16% |
Management Long-Term Incentive Program Allkem Performance Rights (with vesting based on bonus production capacity) | | | 0% | | | 0% | | | 16% |
Management Long-Term Incentive Program Allkem Performance Rights (with vesting based on relative total shareholder return) | | | 100% | | | 100% | | | 16% |
| | Percentage of Allkem Performance Rights that will vest on the date of scheme effectiveness: | |||||||
| | Allkem Performance Rights issued for Fiscal Year 2022 | | | Allkem Performance Rights issued for Fiscal Year 2023 | | | Allkem Performance Rights issued for Fiscal Year 2024 | |
Management Long-Term Award Allkem Performance Rights (granted to members of management who do not participate in the Management Long-Term Incentive Program, with vesting based on continued employment as of the end of a three-year vesting period) | | | 100% | | | 100% | | | 100% |
Merger Retention Allkem Performance Rights (granted in connection with the Galaxy/Orocobre Merger, with vesting based on continued employment as of the vesting date of August 25, 2024) | | | 100% | | | N/A | | | N/A |
• | the view that the transaction would create a leading global lithium chemicals producer with enhanced business-critical scale, including a presence in three major lithium geographies (i.e., the South American “lithium triangle,” Western Australia and Canada) and a combined lithium deposit base that is among the largest in the world; |
• | the view that the combined company would have a highly complementary and vertically integrated business model, including exposure to a broad range of lithium chemical products, low-cost assets and a more resilient supply chain and enhanced operating flexibility and efficiency to better serve customers; |
• | the view that the combined company would have a path to de-risk and accelerate growth, including achieving anticipated production capacity of approximately 250 kMT of LCE by calendar year 2027, due to its pipeline of growth projects and complementary expertise in hard rock mining, conventional and direct lithium extraction-based processes and lithium carbonate production and hydroxide processing; and |
• | the view that the combined company would have a deeper pool of technical, capital and projects expertise in a human resource constrained industry, which would draw on best practice learnings from both companies. |
• | the fixed exchange ratio for the consideration payable to Allkem’s shareholders in the transaction was based on each company’s estimated relative fundamental valuation contribution to the combined company’s risk-adjusted net asset value, on a pre-synergy basis; |
• | the fact that the transaction is expected to result in Allkem’s shareholders owning approximately 56% of the combined company, compared to 53% that was implied by the volume-weighted average market prices of Allkem Shares and Livent Shares over the one-month period preceding the signing of the Transaction Agreement, which implies a premium of approximately 14% to Allkem’s shareholders (measured as the difference between the agreed Merger Exchange Ratio and the implied merger exchange ratio based on the prices of Allkem Shares and Livent Shares using volume weighted average share prices over this period, and calculated assuming Allkem shareholders exchange their Allkem Shares for NewCo Shares at an implied price of A$13.54 per share, which in turn was calculated using the one-month volume weighted average price of Livent Shares over the same period ($21.81), the Merger Exchange Ratio, and the average of the daily USD to AUD foreign exchange rates over the same period); |
• | the view that the transaction would be accretive to Allkem’s and Livent’s shareholders on a net asset value per share basis following anticipated synergies; |
• | the view that the transaction would provide approximately $125 million per year of estimated annual pre-tax cost synergies by 2027 (with the majority expected to be realized within three years of the transaction) (excluding the impact of approximately $40 million in estimated non-recurring costs to achieve these synergies), and approximately $200 million of estimated one-time capital expenditure savings expected by the end of 2025 largely from consolidated infrastructure, streamlined construction and procurement operations and leveraged complementary engineering work; |
• | the view that the combined company would have a stronger financial profile and be positioned to accelerate and deliver upon a growth strategy with a strong balance sheet (including combined liquidity of approximately $1.4 billion based on the companies’ respective publicly reported information as of March 31, 2023 and limited indebtedness) and positive cash flow generation; and |
• | the view that the transaction is generally expected to be cash-free and tax-free for both Allkem’s shareholders and Livent’s stockholders. |
• | the view that greater value is expected to be created for Allkem’s shareholders as the expected owners of approximately 56% of the combined company than as the owners of all of Allkem on a standalone basis, largely due to the factors described above; |
• | the view that the transaction would be more value accretive for Allkem’s shareholders when compared to other available strategic alternatives considered by the Allkem Board; |
• | the view that the transaction would provide Allkem’s shareholders with greater liquidity with respect to their investments, including through the primary listing of the NewCo Shares on the NYSE and a foreign exempt quotation of the CDIs on the ASX and seeking inclusion in key S&P indexes in the U.S. and the S&P / ASX 200 index in Australia (through pro rata CDI inclusion) based on the implied combined market capitalization of Livent and Allkem as well as other factors; |
• | the scope of the due diligence investigation of Livent’s business, operations, financial condition, earnings and prospects conducted by and on behalf of Allkem, and the substantive results thereof; |
• | the current and prospective business climate in the lithium industry; |
• | the governance arrangements that are expected to enable the combined company to benefit from proven and experienced business leaders at both the board of directors and executive officer levels, including: |
○ | The NewCo board of directors consisting of 14 directors, seven of whom will be from Allkem’s existing board of directors and will be nominated by Allkem and seven of whom will be from Livent’s existing board of directors and will be nominated by Livent (the Transaction Agreement has since been amended to provide for 12 directors on the NewCo board of directors, but this remains evenly split between members of the Allkem Board and the Livent Board); |
○ | Mr. Peter Coleman, the current Chairman of the Allkem Board, serving as the Chair of the NewCo board of directors; and |
○ | directors nominated by Allkem serving as the Chairs of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee of the NewCo board of directors; |
• | the commercial, operational and capital deployment teams of NewCo that are expected to be comprised of representatives from both Allkem and Livent and are expected to enable continuity of management; |
• | the other terms and conditions of the Transaction Agreement and related documentation, including: |
○ | the nature and scope of the representations, warranties and covenants of Livent and Allkem in the Transaction Agreement; |
○ | the restrictions on Livent soliciting alternative transaction proposals from third parties and/or providing confidential due diligence information to, or engaging in discussions with, third parties interested in pursuing alternative transactions, except under certain circumstances; |
○ | the fact that Livent must pay Allkem a termination fee of $64.6 million if the Transaction Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances; |
○ | the fact that Allkem would not be required to pay Livent a termination fee if the Transaction Agreement is terminated due to regulatory impediments or, in the absence of a Competing Proposal, due to the failure of Allkem’s shareholders to approve the scheme, the failure of the Independent Expert to conclude that the scheme is in the best interests of Allkem’s shareholders or the failure of the Court to approve the scheme; |
○ | the provisions permitting Allkem, subject to certain terms and conditions, to change its board of directors’ recommendation or to propose or enter into an alternative transaction, and terminate the Transaction Agreement, in response to a Superior Proposal or an Intervening Event; |
○ | the right, subject to certain terms and conditions, to terminate the Transaction Agreement if the scheme is not effective on or before February 10, 2024 (subject to extension by either party until May 10, 2024 in order to obtain required antitrust, investment screening or other regulatory approvals); |
○ | the nature and scope of the restrictions on the conduct of Livent’s business until the consummation of the transaction or the termination of the Transaction Agreement; |
○ | the expectation that the restrictions on Allkem under the Transaction Agreement provide Allkem with sufficient operating flexibility to conduct its business in the ordinary course between the execution of the Transaction Agreement and the consummation of the transaction; |
○ | the fact that Allkem’s aggregate monetary liability for any breaches of the terms of the Transaction Agreement is limited to $64.6 million, except in the case of intentional and material breach or fraud; |
○ | the nature and scope of the obligations of Livent to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the required governmental approvals under the antitrust and investment screening laws of specified jurisdictions, including to potentially agree to certain obligations and restrictions (including divestitures) that would not reasonably be expected to have a material and adverse impact on Livent or the benefits or synergies that Livent expects to realize from the transaction; |
○ | the fact that Allkem’s obligation to consummate the transaction is conditioned on its receipt of confirmation from the ATO that either the ATO is prepared to issue a class ruling or there are no material impediments which may prevent the ATO from issuing a class ruling confirming that qualifying Australian resident shareholders of Allkem will be eligible to choose rollover relief to the extent they receive NewCo Shares or CDIs in connection with the scheme; and |
○ | the nature and scope of the other conditions to the consummation of the transaction, including the absence of any events that have a material adverse effect on either party, the receipt of the required governmental approvals under the antitrust and investment screening laws of specified jurisdictions, the conclusion by the Independent Expert that the scheme is in the best interests of Allkem’s shareholders, the approval by the Court of the scheme and the approval by Allkem’s shareholders of the scheme; and |
• | the likelihood and the anticipated timing of the consummation of the transaction based on, among other things: |
○ | the nature and scope of the conditions to the consummation of the transaction; |
○ | the possibility that a third party would make an offer to merge, acquire or otherwise enter into an extraordinary transaction with Livent or Allkem; |
○ | the likelihood that the ATO would confirm that either it is prepared to issue a class ruling or there are no material impediments which may prevent it from issuing a class ruling confirming that qualifying Australian resident shareholders of Allkem will be eligible to choose rollover relief to the extent they receive NewCo Shares or CDIs in connection with the scheme on a timely basis; and |
○ | the likelihood that the required governmental approvals under the antitrust and investment screening laws of specified jurisdictions would be received without the imposition of certain obligations and restrictions (including divestitures) that would reasonably be expected to have a material and adverse impact on a party or the benefits or synergies that a party expects to realize from the transaction on a timely basis. |
• | the challenges inherent in completing the transaction on the anticipated timetable, including the fact that consummation of the transaction depends on factors outside of Allkem’s control such as regulatory approvals, conclusion by the Independent Expert that the scheme is in the best interests of Allkem’s |
• | the risk that required regulatory approvals, the receipt of which is beyond Allkem’s and Livent’s control, may be delayed, conditioned or denied; |
• | the risk that Livent’s stockholders or Allkem’s shareholders vote against the proposals at the Livent Special Meeting or Allkem’s scheme meeting, respectively; |
• | the challenges inherent in integrating the businesses, operations and workforces of Livent with those of Allkem, and developing and executing a successful strategy and business plan for the combined company; |
• | the potential for management diversion and employee attrition during the period prior to the consummation of the transaction, and the potential negative effects on Allkem’s and, ultimately, the combined company’s, business operations and relationships; |
• | the risk that, despite the efforts of Allkem and Livent prior to the consummation of the transaction, the combined company may lose its relationships with one or more significant customers, suppliers or other strategic partners or be unable to retain key officers or other employees; |
• | the risk of not capturing the anticipated cost savings and synergies and performance improvements, and the risk that other anticipated benefits described above might not be realized, take longer to achieve or involve additional costs to achieve; |
• | the challenges inherent in the combination of two business enterprises of the size and scope of Allkem and Livent and the cross-border nature of the combined company; |
• | the fact that Allkem and Livent have incurred and will continue to incur significant transaction costs and expenses in connection with the transaction, regardless of whether the transaction is consummated, and that those costs may be greater than anticipated; |
• | the risk that the accounting treatment of the transaction differs from what the parties had anticipated at the time of execution of the Transaction Agreement, and that additional expenses and inefficiencies may result from that treatment; |
• | the risk that NewCo could be treated as a domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and the tax expenses and inefficiencies that may result from that treatment; |
• | the risks associated with becoming a U.S. domestic registrant subject to U.S. securities laws, including associated costs, compliance and reporting requirements; |
• | the risks associated with establishing NewCo’s primary stock exchange listing in the U.S. on the NYSE and the risk that NewCo may not be included in indices in the U.S. and Australia (including an S&P index in the U.S. and the S&P / ASX 200 index in Australia); |
• | certain terms of the Transaction Agreement, including, among other things: |
○ | the restrictions on Allkem soliciting alternative transaction proposals from third parties and/or providing confidential due diligence information to, or engaging in discussions with, third parties interested in pursuing alternative transactions, except under certain circumstances; |
○ | the fact that Allkem must pay Livent a termination fee of $64.6 million if the Transaction Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances; |
○ | the provisions permitting Livent, subject to certain terms and conditions, to change its board of directors’ recommendation or propose or enter into an alternative transaction, and to terminate the Transaction Agreement, in response to a Superior Proposal or an Intervening Event; |
○ | the nature and scope of the obligations of Allkem to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the required governmental approvals under the antitrust and investment screening laws of specified jurisdictions, including, under certain circumstances and subject to specified limits, potentially being required to divest certain assets or commit to limitations on the business of Allkem to the extent provided in the Transaction Agreement; |
○ | the nature and scope of the restrictions on the conduct of Allkem’s business until the consummation of the transaction or termination of the Transaction Agreement, which may delay or prevent Allkem from undertaking certain opportunities that may arise; |
○ | the fact that Livent’s aggregate monetary liability for any breaches of the terms of the Transaction Agreement is limited to $64.6 million, except in the case of intentional and material breach or fraud; and |
○ | the fact that the definition of “Material Adverse Effect” has a number of customary exceptions, as described in detail in the section entitled “The Transaction Agreement—Conditions That Must Be Satisfied or Waived for the Transaction to Occur” beginning on page 160 of this proxy statement/prospectus, and is generally a very high standard as applied by courts; and |
• |
• | NewCo is a shell company and was formed in contemplation and for the purpose of completing the transaction; |
• | Livent initiated the negotiation of the transaction; |
• | The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Livent will continue as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of NewCo and Livent’s other executive officer, Ms. Sara Ponessa, General Counsel, will continue to perform the same role for NewCo; |
• | Under the NewCo articles of association, the Chief Executive Officer has the authority to select NewCo’s officers other than those required to be elected by the NewCo board of directors; |
• | The NewCo board of directors will be split evenly with six nominees from each of Livent and Allkem with equal voting rights, and matters on which the NewCo board of directors is deadlocked will not be approved (in this regard, the appointment of Mr. Peter Coleman, who is Allkem’s current Chairman, as the Chair of the NewCo board of directors did not impact the analysis because NewCo’s Chair will not have any tie-breaking or other special voting powers or any ability to affect the voting powers of the other NewCo directors under NewCo’s articles of association); |
• | There was an implied approximately 14% premium (measured as the difference between the agreed Merger Exchange Ratio and the implied merger exchange ratio based on the prices of Allkem Shares and Livent Shares, using volume weighted average share prices over one month from April 10, 2023 through May 9, 2023, the day immediately prior to the date of the Transaction Agreement) to Allkem shareholders; |
• | Notwithstanding that former shareholders of Allkem will own approximately 56% of the NewCo Shares (either directly or through CDIs) compared to Livent stockholders owning approximately 44%, on a fully diluted basis, the shareholders of NewCo will be diffuse with no holder or group of holders having a significant voting or minority ownership and there is no large minority interest and, as discussed above, the NewCo board of directors representing the shareholders will be split evenly with six nominees from each of Livent and Allkem, and each director (including the Chair) will have equal voting rights; and |
• | Livent had a similar total market capitalization to Allkem prior to the announcement of the transaction, notwithstanding Allkem’s larger size in terms of assets, earnings and revenues as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
• | certain financial institutions; |
• | an insurance company; |
• | a regulated investment company, real estate investment trust, or mutual fund; |
• | a dealer or electing trader in securities that uses a mark-to-market method of tax accounting; |
• | a person who holds Livent Shares, or will hold NewCo Shares, as the case may be, as part of a “straddle,” integrated transaction or similar transaction; |
• | a person who holds Livent Shares, or will hold NewCo Shares, as the case may be, in an individual retirement or other tax-deferred account; |
• | a person whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar; |
• | a person who received Livent Shares, or who acquires NewCo Shares, as the case may be, pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation or in connection with the performance of services; |
• | a person required for U.S. federal income tax purposes to conform the timing of income accruals to their financial statements under Section 451 of the Code; |
• | a person who holds Livent Shares, or will hold NewCo Shares, as the case may be, in connection with a trade or business conducted outside of the U.S.; |
• | an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership or other flow-through entity (including an S corporation or a limited liability company treated as a partnership or disregarded entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes); or |
• | a tax-exempt entity. |
• | an individual citizen or resident of the U.S.; |
• | a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation created in or organized under the laws of the U.S., any state therein or the District of Columbia; or |
• | an estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax without regard to its source. |
• | The exchange of Livent Shares by U.S. holders for NewCo Shares in the merger will not result in the recognition of any gain or loss with respect to a U.S. holder’s Livent Shares (except with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares, as discussed below). |
• | The aggregate tax basis of any NewCo Shares a U.S. holder receives in exchange for all of its Livent Shares in the merger, including fractional NewCo Shares deemed received and redeemed or sold, as discussed below, will be the same as the aggregate tax basis of its Livent Shares. |
• | The holding period of any NewCo Shares (including fractional NewCo Shares deemed received and redeemed as discussed below) a U.S. holder receives in the merger will include the holding period of the Livent Shares it exchanged for such NewCo Shares. |
• | If a U.S. holder has differing bases or holding periods in respect of its Livent Shares, the U.S. holder must determine the bases and holding periods in the NewCo Shares received in the merger separately for each identifiable block (that is, stock of the same class acquired at the same time for the same price) of Livent Shares the U.S. holder exchanges. |
• | Because NewCo will not issue any fractional NewCo Shares in the merger, if a U.S. holder exchanges Livent Shares in the merger, and would otherwise have received a fraction of a NewCo Share, the U.S. holder will receive cash. In such a case, the U.S. holder will be treated as having received a fractional share and having received such cash in redemption of the fractional share. The amount of any capital gain or loss the U.S. holder recognizes will equal the amount of cash received with respect to the fractional share less the ratable portion of the tax basis of the Livent Shares surrendered that is allocated to the fractional share. Capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. holder’s holding period in the Livent Shares is more than one year on the date of closing of the merger. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. |
• | a person (not being a company) resident for tax purposes in a Relevant Territory (as defined below) (including the U.S.) and is neither resident nor ordinarily resident in Ireland; |
• | a company resident for tax purposes in a Relevant Territory, provided such company is not under the control, whether directly or indirectly, of a person or persons who is or are resident in Ireland; |
• | a company, wherever resident, that is controlled, directly or indirectly, by persons resident in a Relevant Territory and who is or are (as the case may be) not controlled by, directly or indirectly, persons who are not resident in a Relevant Territory; |
• | a company, wherever resident, whose principal class of shares (or those of its 75% direct or indirect parent) is substantially and regularly traded on a stock exchange in Ireland, on a recognized stock exchange in a Relevant Territory or on such other stock exchange approved by the Irish Minister for Finance; or |
• | a company, wherever resident, that is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by two or more companies where the principal class of shares of each of such companies is substantially and regularly traded on a stock exchange in Ireland, on a recognized stock exchange in a Relevant Territory or on such other stock exchange approved by the Irish Minister for Finance; |
• | The NewCo board of directors will consist of 12 directors, six of whom will be from the existing Allkem Board, including the Chairman of the Allkem Board as of immediately prior to the scheme implementation, and will be nominated by Allkem, and six of whom will be from the existing Livent Board, including the Chief Executive Officer of Livent as of immediately prior to the effective time, and will be nominated by Livent. Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, Livent and Allkem have since nominated the following individuals for the NewCo board of directors: (i) Michael F. Barry, (ii) Peter Coleman, (iii) Alan Fitzpatrick, (iv) Paul W. Graves, (v) Florencia Heredia, (vi) Leanne Heywood, (vii) Christina Lampe-Önnerud, (viii) Pablo Marcet, (ix) Steven T. Merkt, (x) Robert C. Pallash, (xi) Fernando Oris de Roa and (xii) John Turner; |
• | the initial Chair of the NewCo board of directors will be the Chairman of the Allkem Board as of immediately prior to the scheme implementation; |
• | the initial Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NewCo will be the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Livent as of immediately prior to the effective time; |
• | NewCo’s applicable corporate governance policies will require that there be a mandatory retirement age of 75 for the members of the NewCo board of directors; |
• | NewCo’s applicable corporate governance policies will require that the NewCo board of directors have the following committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a Sustainability Committee and such other committees as determined by the NewCo board of directors from time to time; |
• | each of the Chair of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee will be an Allkem Nominee; |
• | each of the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Sustainability Committee will be a Livent Nominee; and |
• | the executive leadership structure of NewCo (other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer), and the persons to fill such positions, in each case as of the effective time, were contemplated to be mutually determined in good faith by Livent and Allkem prior to the scheme effectiveness with the objective of filling such positions with the most qualified persons. Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, the parties have since made this determination, including that Livent’s current General Counsel, Ms. Sara Ponessa, will assume the role of General Counsel of NewCo, as well as determining the rest of the broader senior management team of NewCo as of the effective time, consisting of an approximately equal split of employees from each of Allkem and Livent. |
| | Percentage of Allkem Performance Rights that will vest on the date of scheme effectiveness: | |||||||
| | Allkem Performance Rights issued for Fiscal Year 2022 | | | Allkem Performance Rights issued for Fiscal Year 2023 | | | Allkem Performance Rights issued for Fiscal Year 2024 | |
Management Long-Term Incentive Program Allkem Performance Rights (with vesting based on base production capacity) | | | 98% | | | 100% | | | 16% |
Management Long-Term Incentive Program Allkem Performance Rights (with vesting based on bonus production capacity) | | | 0% | | | 0% | | | 16% |
Management Long-Term Incentive Program Allkem Performance Rights (with vesting based on relative total shareholder return) | | | 100% | | | 100% | | | 16% |
Management Long-Term Award Allkem Performance Rights (granted to members of management who do not participate in the Management Long-Term Incentive Program, with vesting based on continued employment as of the end of a three-year vesting period) | | | 100% | | | 100% | | | 100% |
Merger Retention Allkem Performance Rights (granted in connection with the Galaxy/Orocobre Merger, with vesting based on continued employment as of the vesting date of August 25, 2024) | | | 100% | | | N/A | | | N/A |
• | Livent RSUs. At the effective time, each outstanding time-vested restricted stock unit with respect to Livent Shares (“Livent RSU”) will be assumed by NewCo and will be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to the related Livent RSU immediately prior to the effective time, except that the Livent Shares subject to such Livent RSUs will be converted into the right to receive, upon vesting, a number of NewCo Shares equal to the product of (i) the number of Livent Shares underlying such Livent RSUs immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by (ii) 2.406. Following such assumption, each assumed Livent RSU that is unvested and outstanding as of the date of signing of the Transaction Agreement will vest on a pro rata basis and, to the extent of such vesting, will be exchanged into the right to receive the merger consideration, plus the fractional share consideration (if any), at the effective time or as soon as practicable thereafter. |
• | Livent PSUs. At the effective time, each outstanding performance-based restricted stock unit with respect to Livent Shares (“Livent PSU”) will fully vest, with the number of Livent Shares subject to such Livent PSUs determined based on the achievement of the higher of target and actual performance. At the effective time or as soon as practicable thereafter, each Livent PSU will be canceled in exchange for the right to receive the merger consideration, plus the fractional share consideration (if any). |
• | Livent Options. At the effective time, each outstanding time-vested stock option (whether vested or unvested) with respect to Livent Shares (the “Livent Option”) will be assumed by NewCo (each, a “Livent Assumed Option”). Each Livent Assumed Option will be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to the related Livent Option immediately prior to the effective time, except that (x) each such Livent Assumed Option will be converted into a stock option to acquire a number of NewCo |
• | Livent Director RSUs. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, immediately prior to the effective time, any outstanding time-vested restricted stock unit held by any Livent non-employee directors with respect to Livent Shares (“Livent Director RSUs”) will vest in full and be cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to (i) the number of Livent Shares subject to such Livent Director RSUs immediately prior to the effective time, multiplied by (ii) the higher of (A) the first available closing price of the merger consideration and (B) the closing price per share of Livent Shares as reported in the NYSE, on the last trading day preceding the closing date. |
• | qualification, organization, good standing and corporate or other organizational power; |
• | capitalization or share capital, including equity awards; |
• | authority with respect to the execution and delivery of the Transaction Agreement, and the due and valid execution and delivery and enforceability of the Transaction Agreement; |
• | required regulatory filings and consents and approvals of governmental entities and third parties; |
• | absence of conflicts with, or violations of, organizational documents, contracts and applicable laws; |
• | accuracy of SEC reports, with respect to Livent, or ASIC documents, with respect to Allkem; |
• | fair presentation and GAAP compliance with respect to Livent’s financial statements, and fair presentation and IFRS compliance with respect to Allkem’s financial statements; |
• | internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures; |
• | absence of undisclosed liabilities and off-balance-sheet arrangements; |
• | compliance with laws, court orders and permits; |
• | matters related to employee benefit and compensation plans; |
• | environmental laws; |
• | absence of changes or events that have had, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the applicable party; |
• | conduct of business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice; |
• | absence of certain investigations and litigation; |
• | tax matters; |
• | labor matters; |
• | intellectual property matters; |
• | real property matters; |
• | shareholder votes required for the Livent Stockholder Approval or the Allkem Shareholder Approval, as applicable, and the inapplicability of anti-takeover statutes; |
• | material contracts; |
• | insurance matters; |
• | fees payable to finders or brokers in connection with the transaction; |
• | compliance with anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; |
• | sanctions matters; |
• | export and import matters; |
• | matters related to mining rights; |
• | each of Livent and Allkem’s ownership of equity interests in the other party or such other party’s subsidiaries; |
• | status under the Investment Canada Act; and |
• | the absence of other representations or warranties made outside of the Transaction Agreement. |
• | any changes in global, national or regional economic conditions, including any changes generally affecting financial, credit or capital market conditions; |
• | conditions (or changes therein) in any industry or industries in which such person or any of its subsidiaries operates, including in the lithium mining and chemicals industry (including changes in general market prices for lithium chemicals and related products (including pricing under futures contracts)); |
• | general legal, tax, economic, political and/or regulatory conditions (or changes therein); |
• | any change or prospective changes in GAAP, IFRS, Australian Accounting Standards, JORC, NI 43-101, Subpart 1300 or the interpretation thereof; |
• | any adoption, implementation, promulgation, repeal, modification, amendment, reinterpretation, change or proposal of any applicable law of and by any governmental entity (including with respect to taxes); |
• | the execution and delivery of the Transaction Agreement and, in the case of Livent, the deed poll, or the negotiation, public announcement, pendency or consummation of the transaction or compliance with the terms of the Transaction Agreement and, in the case of Livent, the deed poll, including any transaction litigation and including any actual or potential loss or impairment after the date of the Transaction Agreement of any contract or business relationship to the extent arising as a result thereof (it being understood that this bullet will not apply with respect to any representation or warranty contained in the Transaction Agreement or, in the case of Livent, the deed poll, to the extent the purpose of such representation or warranty is to address the consequences resulting from the execution and delivery of the Transaction Agreement or, in the case of Livent, the deed poll, or the consummation of the transaction or the compliance with the terms of the Transaction Agreement or, in the case of Livent, the deed poll; |
• | any change in the price or trading volume of the shares of such person, in and of itself (it being understood that the Effects giving rise or contributing to such change that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “material adverse effect” may be taken into account); |
• | any failure by such person to meet, or any change in, any internal or published projections, estimates or expectations of such person’s revenue, earnings or other financial performance or results of operations for any period, in and of itself, or any failure by such person to meet its internal budgets, plans or forecasts of its revenues, earnings or other financial performance or results of operations, in and of itself (it being understood that the Effects giving rise or contributing to such change that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “material adverse effect” may be taken into account); |
• | Effects arising out of changes in geopolitical conditions, the outbreak of a pandemic, epidemic, endemic or other widespread health crisis (including COVID-19), acts of terrorism or sabotage, war (whether or not declared), the commencement, continuation or escalation of a war, acts of armed hostility, weather conditions, natural disasters or other similar force majeure events, including any material worsening of such conditions threatened or existing as of the date of the Transaction Agreement; |
• | any action taken at the request of the other party in writing; |
• | any reduction in the credit rating or credit rating outlook of such person or its subsidiaries or any increase in credit default swap spreads with respect to indebtedness of such person or its subsidiaries, in and of itself (it being understood that the Effects giving rise or contributing to such change that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of “material adverse effect” may be taken into account); or |
• | effects arising out of any conversion or reconciliation among IFRS, GAAP, Australian Accounting Standards, JORC, NI 43-101 and Subpart 1300 undertaken in connection with the transaction; |
• | amend the governing documents of Livent or any of its subsidiaries; |
• | split, combine, subdivide, reduce or reclassify any of its issued or unissued capital stock or other equity interests, or issue or authorize the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for, shares of its capital stock or other equity interests, except for any such transaction by a subsidiary of Livent which remains a subsidiary of Livent after consummation of such transaction or as otherwise permitted by the Transaction Agreement; |
• | declare, determine to be paid, set aside, authorize or pay any dividends on or make any distribution with respect to its outstanding shares of capital stock or other equity interests, except for any dividends or distributions paid by a direct or indirect subsidiary of Livent to another direct or indirect subsidiary of Livent or to Livent; |
• | enter into any agreement with respect to the voting of its capital stock or other equity interests; |
• | purchase, repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital stock or other equity interests or any securities convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for any shares of its capital stock or other equity interests (other than (i) pursuant to the vesting of, exercise (whether cashless or not), forfeiture of or withholding of taxes with respect to, Livent equity awards, in each case in accordance with past practice and as required or permitted by the terms of the Livent equity plan as in effect on the date of the Transaction Agreement (or as modified after the date of the Transaction Agreement in accordance with the terms of the Transaction Agreement) or (ii) purchases, repurchases, redemptions or other acquisitions of capital stock or other equity interests of any Livent subsidiary by Livent or any other Livent subsidiary); |
• | authorize, recommend, propose or announce an intention to adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, merger, consolidation, restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization (excluding any transactions, mergers or consolidations between Livent subsidiaries or transfers of interests of Livent subsidiaries to Livent or other Livent subsidiaries, or liquidation or dissolution of a Livent subsidiary); |
• | except as required by the terms and conditions of any Livent benefit plan in effect on the date of the Transaction Agreement (including when the Livent Board is affirmatively required to exercise discretion thereunder, provided that the Livent Board is acting reasonably): |
• | grant any long-term incentive awards (including Livent equity awards), other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; |
• | materially amend or modify any Livent benefit plan or establish any new material Livent benefit plan, other than to renew Livent’s health care insurance program in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; |
• | modify or increase the compensation or benefits payable or to become payable to any of its directors, officers, employees or individual independent contractors, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice (including any such increases made in response to inflation or to align with existing market rates); |
• | pay or award, or commit to pay or award, any bonuses or incentive compensation, other than (i) as part of Livent’s fiscal year 2023 or 2024 annual compensation program, in each case consistent with past practice, or (ii) otherwise in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; |
• | establish, adopt, enter into, amend or terminate any collective bargaining agreement or other contract with any labor organization; |
• | except as contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, take any action to accelerate the vesting, payment or funding of any payment or benefit payable or to become payable to any of its directors, officers, employees or individual independent contractors; |
• | terminate the employment of any officer of Livent subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, other than for cause; |
• | hire any officer, employee or individual independent contractor having total target annual cash compensation of more than $300,000, or any officer of Livent subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, other than to fill open positions or positions that become open, to complete hirings that are already in progress as of the date of the Transaction Agreement or to fill new roles that have been duly budgeted and approved; or |
• | implement or announce any employee layoffs (other than for cause or in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice) or location closings (other than any consolidation of existing corporate offices within the U.S. in a manner which does not require any terminations except for cause); |
• | make any material change in financial accounting policies, principles, practices or procedures or any of Livent’s methods of reporting income, deductions or other material items for financial accounting purposes, except as required by GAAP, applicable law or SEC rules; |
• | authorize or announce an intention to authorize, or enter into agreements providing for, any acquisitions of any business or investments in third parties (excluding any capital expenditures), whether by merger, consolidation, purchase of property or assets, joint venture, licenses or otherwise, except for such transactions for consideration (including the assumption of liabilities) that does not exceed (when taken together with all other such transactions) $10 million in the aggregate (valuing any non-cash consideration at its fair market value as of the date of the agreement for such acquisition); |
• | enter into any new material line of business other than any line of business that is reasonably ancillary to or a reasonably foreseeable extension of any line of business engaged in by Livent as of the date of the Transaction Agreement; |
• | issue, deliver, grant, sell, transfer, pledge, dispose of or encumber, or authorize the issuance, delivery, grant, sale, transfer, pledge, disposition or encumbrance of, any shares of capital stock, voting securities or other equity interests in Livent or any of its subsidiaries or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such shares, voting securities or equity interests, or any rights, warrants or options to acquire any such shares of its capital stock, voting securities or equity interests or any “phantom” stock, “phantom” stock rights, stock appreciation rights or stock based performance units or take any action to cause to be |
• | create, incur, assume or otherwise become liable with respect to any indebtedness (whether evidenced by a note or other instrument, pursuant to an issuance of debt securities, financing lease, sale-leaseback transaction or otherwise), other than (i) indebtedness solely between Livent and a subsidiary of Livent or between subsidiaries of Livent in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (ii) borrowings by Livent or any of its subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice under Livent’s existing credit agreement and guarantees of such borrowings issued by the subsidiaries of Livent to the extent required under the terms of such credit agreement as in effect on the date of the Transaction Agreement, (iii) in connection with any existing project financing or future project financing publicly disclosed by Livent prior to the date of the Transaction Agreement and (iv) in connection with letters of credit issued or hedging arrangements entered into in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; |
• | make any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any other person (other than Livent (in the case of loans and advances) or any subsidiary of Livent), in each case, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or as otherwise permitted by the Transaction Agreement; |
• | sell, lease, license, transfer, exchange, swap, let lapse, cancel, pledge, abandon or otherwise dispose of, or subject to any lien (other than certain permitted liens), any properties or assets (including intellectual property but excluding its own equity interests), except (i) in the case of liens, as required in connection with any indebtedness permitted to be incurred pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, (ii) sales of inventory or products produced in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, or dispositions of obsolete or worthless equipment in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (iii) non-exclusive licenses of intellectual property in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (iv) such transactions with neither a fair market value of the assets or properties nor an aggregate purchase price that exceeds (when taken together with all other such transactions) $5 million in the aggregate (valuing any non-cash consideration at its fair market value as of the date of the agreement for such transaction), and (v) for transactions among Livent and its subsidiaries or among its subsidiaries; |
• | without limiting Livent’s ability to take action pursuant to the Transaction Agreement with respect to transaction litigation, settle, or offer or propose to settle, any proceeding involving or against Livent or any of its subsidiaries, other than ordinary course disputes with vendors, customers or employees in which no litigation or arbitration commences, and settlements or compromises of any proceeding where the amount paid in an individual settlement or compromise by Livent (and not including any amount paid by Livent’s third-party insurance carriers or third parties) does not exceed an amount agreed-upon with Allkem and there is no material non-monetary relief; |
• | make or change any material tax election or change any tax accounting period for purposes of a material tax or material method of tax accounting, settle or compromise any audit or proceeding relating to taxes that involves a material amount of taxes or enter into any “closing agreement” with respect to any material tax; |
• | make or commit to any new capital expenditure, other than (i) in connection with the repair or replacement of facilities, properties or assets destroyed or damaged due to casualty or accident, (ii) in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or (iii) an amount, in the aggregate, not in excess of 110% of an amount agreed-upon with Allkem; |
• | except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or with respect to matters that are expressly permitted by the Transaction Agreement, enter into any contract that would, if entered into prior to the date of the Transaction Agreement, be a material contract, or modify, amend or terminate any of Livent’s material contracts or waive, release or assign any material rights, benefits or claims thereunder; |
• | terminate, revoke, amend or otherwise modify the joinder agreements or any other contract with NewCo, a subsidiary of NewCo, Irish IntermediateCo or Merger Sub or any equityholder, director or officer thereof in such equityholder’s, director’s or officer’s capacity as such; or |
• | agree, resolve or commit, in writing or otherwise, to take any of the foregoing actions. |
• | amend the governing documents of Allkem or any of its subsidiaries; |
• | split, combine, subdivide, reduce or reclassify any of its issued or unissued capital stock or other equity interests, or issue or authorize the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for, shares of its capital stock or other equity interests, except for any such transaction by a subsidiary of Allkem which remains a subsidiary of Allkem after consummation of such transaction or as otherwise permitted by the Transaction Agreement; |
• | declare, determine to be paid, set aside, authorize or pay any dividends on or make any distribution with respect to its outstanding shares of capital stock or other equity interests, except for any dividends or distributions paid by a direct or indirect subsidiary of Allkem to another direct or indirect subsidiary of Allkem or to Allkem; |
• | enter into any agreement with respect to the voting of its capital stock or other equity interests; |
• | purchase, repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital stock or other equity interests or any securities convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for any shares of its capital stock or other equity interests (other than (i) pursuant to the vesting of, exercise (whether cashless or not) of, forfeiture of or withholding of taxes with respect to, Allkem Performance Rights, in each case in accordance with past practice and as required or permitted by the terms of the Allkem equity plan as in effect on the date of the Transaction Agreement (or as modified after the date of the Transaction Agreement in accordance with the terms of the Transaction Agreement) or (ii) purchases, repurchases, redemptions or other acquisitions of capital stock or other equity interests of any Allkem subsidiary by Allkem or any other Allkem subsidiary); |
• | authorize, recommend, propose or announce an intention to adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, merger, consolidation, restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization (excluding any transactions, mergers or consolidations between Allkem subsidiaries or transfers of interests of Allkem subsidiaries to Allkem or other Allkem subsidiaries, or liquidation or dissolution of an Allkem subsidiary); |
• | except as required by the terms and conditions of any Allkem benefit plan in effect as of the date of the Transaction Agreement (including when the Allkem Board is affirmatively required to exercise discretion thereunder, provided that the Allkem Board is acting reasonably): |
• | grant any long-term incentive awards (including Allkem Performance Rights), other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; |
• | materially amend or modify any Allkem benefit plan or establish any new material Allkem benefit plan, other than to renew Allkem’s health care insurance program in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice ; |
• | modify or increase the compensation or benefits payable or to become payable to any of its directors, officers, employees or individual independent contractors, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice (including any such increases made in response to inflation or to align salaries with existing market rates); |
• | pay or award, or commit to pay or award, any bonuses or incentive compensation, other than (i) as part of Allkem’s fiscal year 2023 or 2024 annual compensation program, in each case consistent with past practice, or (ii) otherwise in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; |
• | establish, adopt, enter into, amend or terminate any collective bargaining agreement or other contract with any labor organization; |
• | except as contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, take any action to accelerate the vesting, payment or funding of any payment or benefit payable or to become payable to any of its directors, officers, employees or individual independent contractors; |
• | terminate the employment of any key management personnel of Allkem, other than for cause; |
• | hire any officer, employee or individual independent contractor having total target annual cash compensation of more than $300,000, or any key management personnel of Allkem, other than to fill open positions or positions that become open, to complete hirings that are already in progress as of the date of the Transaction Agreement or to fill new roles that have been duly budgeted and approved; or |
• | implement or announce any employee layoffs (other than for cause or in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice) or location closings (other than any consolidation of existing corporate offices within Australia in a manner which does not require any terminations except for cause); |
• | make any material change in financial accounting policies, principles, practices or procedures or any of its methods of reporting income, deductions or other material items for financial accounting purposes, except as required by IFRS, Australian Accounting Standards, applicable law (including applicable Canadian securities laws) or ASIC, ASX or TSX rules, regulations and policy; |
• | authorize or announce an intention to authorize, or enter into agreements providing for, any acquisitions of any business or investments in third parties (excluding any capital expenditures), whether by merger, consolidation, purchase of property or assets, joint venture, licenses or otherwise, except for such transactions for consideration (including the assumption of liabilities) that does not exceed (when taken together with all other such transactions) $10 million in the aggregate (valuing any non-cash consideration at its fair market value as of the date of the agreement for such acquisition); |
• | enter into any new material line of business other than any line of business that is reasonably ancillary to or a reasonably foreseeable extension of any line of business engaged in by Allkem as of the date of the Transaction Agreement; |
• | issue, deliver, grant, sell, transfer, pledge, dispose of or encumber, or authorize the issuance, delivery, grant, sale, transfer, pledge, disposition or encumbrance of, any shares of capital stock, voting securities or other equity interests in Allkem or any of its subsidiaries or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such shares, voting securities or equity interests, or any rights, warrants or options to acquire any such shares of its capital stock, voting securities or equity interests or any “phantom” stock, “phantom” stock rights, stock appreciation rights or stock based performance units or take any action to cause to be exercisable any otherwise unexercisable Allkem Performance Rights under any existing Allkem equity plan, other than (i) as otherwise required by the terms and conditions of any Allkem Performance Rights as in effect on the date of the Transaction Agreement (including when the Allkem Board is affirmatively |
• | create, incur, assume or otherwise become liable with respect to any indebtedness (whether evidenced by a note or other instrument, pursuant to an issuance of debt securities, financing lease, sale-leaseback transaction or otherwise), other than (i) indebtedness solely between Allkem and a subsidiary of Allkem or between subsidiaries of Allkem in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (ii) in connection with any existing project financing or future project financing publicly disclosed by Allkem prior to the date of the Transaction Agreement and (iii) in connection with letters of credit issued or hedging arrangements entered into in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; |
• | make any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any other person (other than Allkem (in the case of loans and advances) or any subsidiary of Allkem), in each case, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or as otherwise permitted by the Transaction Agreement; |
• | sell, lease, license, transfer, exchange, swap, let lapse, cancel, pledge, abandon or otherwise dispose of, or subject to any lien (other than certain permitted liens), any properties or assets (including intellectual property but excluding its own equity interests), except (i) in the case of liens, as required in connection with any indebtedness permitted to be incurred pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, (ii) sales of inventory or products produced in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, or dispositions of obsolete or worthless equipment in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (iii) non-exclusive licenses of intellectual property in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (iv) such transactions with neither a fair market value of the assets or properties nor an aggregate purchase price that exceeds (when taken together with all other such transactions) $5 million in the aggregate (valuing any non-cash consideration at its fair market value as of the date of the agreement for such transaction), and (v) for transactions among Allkem and its subsidiaries or among its subsidiaries; |
• | without limiting Allkem’s ability to take action pursuant to the Transaction Agreement with respect to transaction litigation, settle, or offer or propose to settle, any proceeding involving or against Allkem or any of its subsidiaries, other than ordinary course disputes with vendors, customers or employees in which no litigation or arbitration commences, and settlements or compromises of any proceeding where the amount paid in an individual settlement or compromise by Allkem (and not including any amount paid by Allkem’s third-party insurance carriers or third parties) does not exceed an amount agreed-upon with Livent and there is no material non-monetary relief; |
• | make or change any material tax election or change any tax accounting period for purposes of a material tax or material method of tax accounting, settle or compromise any audit or proceeding relating to taxes that involves a material amount of taxes or enter into any “closing agreement” with respect to any material tax; |
• | make or commit to any new capital expenditure, other than (i) in connection with the repair or replacement of facilities, properties or assets destroyed or damaged due to casualty or accident, (ii) in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or (iii) an amount, in the aggregate, not in excess of 110% of an amount agreed-upon with Livent; |
• | except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or with respect to matters that are expressly permitted by the Transaction Agreement, enter into any contract that would, if entered into prior to the date of the Transaction Agreement, be a material contract, or modify, amend or terminate any of Allkem’s material contracts or waive, release or assign any material rights, benefits or claims thereunder; or |
• | agree, resolve or commit, in writing or otherwise, to take any of the foregoing actions. |
• | initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage or otherwise knowingly facilitate (including by way of furnishing non-public information) any inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer, that constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, any Competing Proposal; |
• | engage in, continue or otherwise participate in any discussions or negotiations with any third party with respect to, relating to or in furtherance of any Competing Proposal or any inquiry, proposal or offer that would reasonably be expected to lead to a Competing Proposal; |
• | provide any non-public information or data or access to the properties, assets or employees of Livent or Allkem and their respective subsidiaries, as applicable, to any third party in connection with, related to or in contemplation of any Competing Proposal or any inquiry, proposal or offer that would reasonably be expected to lead to a Competing Proposal; |
• | in the case of Livent only, approve any third party becoming an “interested shareholder” under Section 203 of the DGCL; |
• | discuss with any third party, approve or recommend, or propose to discuss, approve or recommend, or execute or enter into any agreement in principle, letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, term sheet, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement or other agreement, in each case of the foregoing relating to a Competing Proposal or any inquiry, proposal or offer, in each case of the foregoing that would reasonably be expected to lead to a Competing Proposal (other than a confidentiality agreement in accordance with the requirements provided for in the Transaction Agreement); or |
• | submit any Competing Proposal to the vote of Livent’s or Allkem’s shareholders, as applicable; |
• | change, withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify, or publicly propose or announce any intention to change, withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify in a manner adverse to the other party, its Board Recommendation; |
• | fail to include its Board Recommendation in this proxy statement/prospectus, in the case of Livent, or the scheme booklet, in the case of Allkem; |
• | approve, adopt, endorse or recommend, or publicly propose or announce any intention to approve, adopt, endorse or recommend, any Competing Proposal; |
• | publicly agree or propose to enter into, any agreement in principle, letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, term sheet, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement or other agreement, in each case of the foregoing relating to a Competing Proposal (other than a confidentiality agreement as provided for in the Transaction Agreement) (an “Alternative Acquisition Agreement”); |
• | in the case of Livent only, in the case of a Competing Proposal that is structured as a tender offer or exchange offer pursuant to the Exchange Act for outstanding Livent Shares (other than by Allkem or an affiliate of Allkem), fail to recommend, in a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9, against acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by its stockholders on or prior to the earlier of (A) three business days prior to the date the Livent Special Meeting is held, including adjournments (or promptly after commencement of such tender offer or exchange offer if commenced on or after the third business day prior to the date the Livent Special Meeting is held, including adjournments) or (B) ten business days (as such term is used in Rule 14d-9 of the Exchange Act) after commencement of such tender offer or exchange offer; or |
• | cause or permit it to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement. |
• | in the case of Livent only, the Livent Board may, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, make such disclosures as it determines in good faith are necessary to comply with Rule 14d-9, Rule 14e-2(a) or Item 1012(a) of Regulation M-A promulgated under the Exchange Act or make any “stop, look and listen” |
• | prior to, but not after, the receipt of its shareholder approval, it and its representatives, as applicable, may engage in the activities prohibited by the Transaction Agreement (and, only with respect to a Competing Proposal that satisfies the requirements laid out in the Transaction Agreement, may solicit, propose, knowingly encourage or knowingly facilitate any inquiry or the making of any proposal or offer with respect to such Competing Proposal or any modification thereto) with any person if it receives a bona fide written Competing Proposal from such person that was not solicited at any time following the execution of the Transaction Agreement in breach of the obligations set forth in the Transaction Agreement; provided, however, that (i) no information that is prohibited from being furnished pursuant to the Transaction Agreement may be furnished until it receives an executed confidentiality agreement from such person containing obligations on the recipient of that information which its board of directors, acting in good faith and after taking advice from its external legal advisers experienced in transactions of this nature, determines are appropriate for a transaction of the nature of a Competing Proposal, and which contains standstill provisions that apply to the third party subject to exceptions that it (acting reasonably) considers appropriate in the circumstances having regard to (among other things) the fact that it is already subject to a public change of control proposal, as applicable; provided, further, that such confidentiality agreement does not contain provisions that prohibit it from providing any information to the other party in accordance with the Transaction Agreement or that otherwise prohibits it from complying with the provisions of the Transaction Agreement; (ii) any such non-public information has previously been made available to, or is made available to, the other party prior to or concurrently with (or in the case of oral non-public information only, promptly (and in any event within 24 hours) after) the time such information is made available to such person, except that it is not required to provide or make available to the other party any information that it, acting reasonably, determines is likely commercially sensitive information of that person; and (iii) prior to taking any such actions, its board of directors or any committee thereof determines in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such Competing Proposal is, or could reasonably be considered to become, a Superior Proposal and that failing to take such actions would likely breach the statutory or fiduciary duties of its board of directors under applicable law; |
• | prior to, but not after, the receipt of its shareholder approval, its board of directors will be permitted, through its representatives or otherwise, to seek clarification from (but not, unless otherwise allowed pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, to provide any non-public information to) any person that has made a Competing Proposal solely to clarify and understand the terms and conditions of such proposal to provide adequate information for its board of directors to make an informed determination under the Transaction Agreement; |
• | prior to, but not after, the receipt of its shareholder approval, in response to a bona fide written Competing Proposal from a third party that was not solicited in breach of, and did not otherwise arise from a breach of, the obligations set forth in the Transaction Agreement, if its board of directors so chooses, its board of directors may effect a Change of Recommendation; provided, however, that such a Change of Recommendation may not be made unless and until: |
• | its board of directors determines in good faith after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel that such Competing Proposal is a Superior Proposal; |
• | its board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that failing to effect a Change of Recommendation in response to such Superior Proposal would likely breach the statutory or fiduciary duties of its board of directors under applicable law; |
• | it provides the other party written notice of such proposed action and the basis thereof at least four business days in advance, which notice will set forth in writing that its board of directors intends to consider whether to take such action and include all material terms and conditions of the Competing Proposal; |
• | after giving such notice and prior to effecting such Change of Recommendation, it will make itself available to negotiate (and cause its officers, employees, financial advisor and outside legal counsel to be available to negotiate) with the other party (to the extent the other party wishes to negotiate) to make such adjustments or revisions to the terms of the Transaction Agreement as would permit its board of directors not to effect a Change of Recommendation in response thereto; and |
• | at the end of such four business day period, prior to taking action to effect a Change of Recommendation, its board of directors takes into account any adjustments or revisions to the terms of the Transaction Agreement proposed by the other party in writing and any other information offered by the other party in response to the notice, and determines in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that the Competing Proposal remains a Superior Proposal and that failing to effect a Change of Recommendation in response to such Superior Proposal would likely breach the statutory or fiduciary duties of its board of directors under applicable law; provided that in the event of any material amendment or material modification to any Superior Proposal, it will be required to deliver a new written notice to the other party and to comply with the requirements of the Transaction Agreement with respect to such new written notice, except that the advance written notice obligation will be reduced to two business days; and |
• | prior to, but not after, receipt of its shareholder approval, in response to (i) an Intervening Event that occurs or arises after the date of the Transaction Agreement or (ii) only in the case of Allkem, due to the Independent Expert not concluding (or ceasing to conclude) that the scheme is in the best interest of Allkem shareholders (the “Independent Expert Event”) and, in each case, that did not arise from its breach of the Transaction Agreement, such party may, if its board of directors so chooses, effect a Change of Recommendation; provided, however, that such a Change of Recommendation may not be made unless and until: |
• | only in the case of an Intervening Event, its board of directors determines in good faith after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel that an Intervening Event has occurred; |
• | only in the case of an Intervening Event, its board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that failing to effect a Change of Recommendation in response to such Intervening Event would likely breach the statutory or fiduciary duties of its board of directors under applicable law; |
• | it provides the other party written notice of such proposed action and the basis thereof four business days in advance, which notice will set forth in writing that its board of directors intends to consider whether to take such action and includes a reasonably detailed description of the facts and circumstances of the Intervening Event or the Independent Expert Event, as applicable; |
• | after giving such notice and prior to effecting such Change of Recommendation and if requested by the other party, it negotiates (and causes its officers, employees, financial advisor and outside legal counsel to negotiate) in good faith with the other party (to the extent the other party wishes to negotiate) to make such adjustments or revisions to the terms of the Transaction Agreement as would permit its board of directors not to effect a Change of Recommendation in response thereto; and |
• | at the end of such four business day period, prior to taking action to effect a Change of Recommendation, its board of directors takes into account any adjustments or revisions to the terms of the Transaction Agreement proposed by the other party in writing and any other information offered by the other party in response to the notice, and only in the case of an Intervening Event, determines in good faith after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that failing to effect a Change of Recommendation in response to such Intervening Event would likely breach the statutory or fiduciary duties of its board of directors under applicable law; provided that in the event of any material changes regarding any Intervening Event, it will be required to deliver a new written notice to the other party and to comply with the requirements of the Transaction Agreement with respect to such new written notice, except that the advance written notice obligation will be reduced to two business days; provided, further, that any such new written notice will in no event shorten the original four business day notice period. |
• | prepare and file as promptly as reasonably practicable all documentation to effect all necessary notices, reports and other filings (including by filing as promptly as reasonably practicable after the date of the Transaction Agreement the notifications, filings and other information required to be filed under any applicable antitrust or investment screening laws with respect to the transaction, including the HSR Act and CFIUS laws) in order to consummate the transaction; |
• | obtain as promptly as reasonably practicable (and in any event prior to the end date) all consents, registrations, approvals, permits, expirations or terminations of waiting periods and authorizations necessary or advisable to be obtained from any governmental entity and any third party in order to consummate the transaction, including the HSR Act and CFIUS laws; and |
• | use its reasonable best efforts to resolve as promptly as reasonably practicable (and in any event prior to the end date) such objections, if any, as may be asserted by any governmental entity in connection with any applicable laws with respect to the transaction. |
• | confidentiality and access by each party to certain information about the other party during the period prior to the effective time; |
• | cooperation between Livent and Allkem in connection with public announcements; |
• | cooperation between Livent and Allkem in connection with each party’s indebtedness and any credit agreements, indentures, notes or other documents or instruments governing or related to indebtedness; |
• | causing certain acquisitions and dispositions of Livent Shares and NewCo Shares to be exempt under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act; |
• | using reasonable best efforts to cause the NewCo Shares to be approved for listing on the NYSE and to establish a listing on the ASX to enable the trading of CDIs; |
• | delisting of the Livent Shares from the NYSE and the deregistration of the Livent Shares under the Exchange Act; |
• | application to the ASX to suspend trading in Allkem Shares and removal of Allkem from the official list of ASX and TSX; |
• | establishing NewCo’s tax residence and registering NewCo for corporation tax, in each case, in the Republic of Ireland; |
• | cooperation between Livent and Allkem regarding any litigation related to the transaction; |
• | compliance with anti-takeover laws; |
• | establishing NewCo’s fiscal year end as December 31; and |
• | seeking inclusion of the NewCo Shares and the CDIs in an S&P index (in the case of the NewCo Shares) and the S&P / ASX 200 index (in the case of the CDIs). |
• | as at 8:00 a.m. AWST on the sanction date, each of the conditions set out below (other than the conditions in the second and third bullets below) has been satisfied or waived (where permitted); |
• | the approval by the Court (or any court of competent jurisdiction on appeal therefrom) (without material modification) of the scheme pursuant to Section 411(4)(b) of the Australian Corporations Act; |
• | the lodging by Allkem of an office copy of the Court orders approving the scheme under Section 411(4)(b) of the Australian Corporations Act with ASIC; |
• | the closing of the merger being capable of occurring, and would reasonably be expected to occur, as promptly as practicable following implementation of the scheme, meaning no applicable impediments under the terms of the Transaction Agreement exist or are foreseen such that there is any possibility that the scheme implementation and the merger closing do not occur around the same time, noting that the only condition to the merger occurring is the occurrence of the scheme implementation; |
• | the Allkem Shareholder Approval being duly obtained at the scheme meeting (or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in each case at which a vote on such approval was taken); |
• | the Livent Stockholder Approval being duly obtained at the Livent Special Meeting (or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in each case at which a vote on such approval was taken); |
• | (i) the NYSE having approved the listing of the NewCo Shares to be issued to the holders of Livent Shares and the NewCo Shares, including the NewCo Shares underlying the CDIs, to be issued to holders of Allkem Shares pursuant to the transaction, subject to official notice of issuance, and (ii) the ASX having provided approval for the admission of NewCo as a foreign exempt listing to the official list of ASX and the approval for official quotation of the CDIs, whether or not such approval is subject to conditions; |
• | all applicable governmental consents under specified antitrust and investment screening laws, in each case on any terms described in the Transaction Agreement (as the list may be amended with the written consent of Livent and Allkem) must have been obtained or made (as applicable) and remain in full force and effect and all applicable waiting periods (including any extensions by agreement or operation of law) applicable to the scheme and the merger with respect thereto must have expired, lapsed or been terminated (as applicable); |
• | the registration statement on Form S-4 of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part must have become effective under the Securities Act and must not be the subject of any stop order (which has not been withdrawn) or proceedings initiated by the SEC seeking any stop order; |
• | (i) no governmental entity of a competent jurisdiction will have issued any order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) that is in effect and restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the consummation |
• | at 8:00 a.m. AWST on the sanction date, neither the Transaction Agreement nor the deed poll having been terminated in accordance with its terms. |
• | certain representations and warranties of Livent with respect to capitalization are true and correct, subject only to de minimis inaccuracies, on the date of the Transaction Agreement and at the sanction date as though made on the sanction date (or, in the case of representations and warranties given as of another specified date, as of that date); |
• | the representations and warranties of Livent that there has not occurred any Effect since December 31, 2022, that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on Livent are true and correct in all respects on the date of the Transaction Agreement and at the sanction date as though made on the sanction date; |
• | certain representations and warranties of Livent with respect to organization, capitalization, corporate authority, opinion of financial advisor, required vote, takeover statutes and finders and brokers are true and correct in all material respects (without any materiality, material adverse effect or similar qualification) on the date of the Transaction Agreement and at the sanction date as though made on the sanction date (or, in the case of representations and warranties given as of another specified date, as of that date); |
• | the other representations and warranties of Livent set forth in the Transaction Agreement are true and correct in all respects on the date of the Transaction Agreement and at the sanction date as though made on the sanction date (or, in the case of representations and warranties given as of another specified date, as of that date) except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct (without giving effect to any materiality, material adverse effect or similar qualification), individually or in the aggregate, has not had, or would not reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect on Livent; |
• | each of Livent and the NewCo Parties have in all material respects performed the obligations and complied with the covenants required by the Transaction Agreement to be performed or complied with by it prior to the sanction date; |
• | Livent has delivered to Allkem a certificate, dated as of the sanction date and signed by the Chief Executive Officer of Livent, certifying on behalf of Livent to the effect that the conditions set forth in the preceding five bullets have been satisfied; |
• | there has been no material adverse effect with respect to Livent; |
• | the Independent Expert has issued the IER, which concludes that the scheme is in the best interest of Allkem shareholders and the Independent Expert does not change, withdraw or qualify its conclusion in any written update to its IER or withdraw the IER; and |
• | Allkem has received confirmation (verbal or otherwise) from the ATO that either (i) there are no material impediments to or material issues to be resolved which may prevent the ATO from issuing the ATO Class Ruling or (ii) the ATO is prepared to issue the ATO Class Ruling, in a form and substance satisfactory to Allkem (acting reasonably), confirming that qualifying Australian resident Allkem shareholders will be eligible to choose rollover relief to the extent to which they receive NewCo Shares or CDIs in exchange for their Allkem Shares in connection with the scheme. Should an ATO Class Ruling not be available for |
• | certain representations and warranties of Allkem with respect to capitalization are true and correct, subject only to de minimis inaccuracies, on the date of the Transaction Agreement and at the sanction date as though made on the sanction date (or, in the case of representations and warranties given as of another specified date, as of that date); |
• | the representations and warranties of Allkem that there has not occurred any Effect since June 30, 2022, that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on Allkem are true and correct in all respects on the date of the Transaction Agreement and at the sanction date as though made on the sanction date; |
• | certain representations and warranties of Allkem with respect to organization, capitalization, corporate authority, required vote, takeover statutes and finders and brokers are true and correct in all material respects (without any materiality, material adverse effect or similar qualification) on the date of the Transaction Agreement and at the sanction date as though made on the sanction date (or, in the case of representations and warranties given as of another specified date, as of that date); |
• | the other representations and warranties of Allkem set forth in the Transaction Agreement are true and correct on the date of the Transaction Agreement and at the sanction date as though made on the sanction date (or, in the case of representations and warranties given as of another specified date, as of that date) except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct (without giving effect to any materiality, material adverse effect or similar qualification), individually or in the aggregate, has not had, or would not reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect on Allkem; |
• | Allkem has in all material respects performed the obligations and complied with the covenants required by the Transaction Agreement to be performed or complied with by it prior to the sanction date; |
• | Allkem has delivered to Livent a certificate, dated as of the sanction date and signed by the Chief Executive Officer of Allkem, certifying on behalf of Allkem to the effect that the conditions set forth in the preceding five bullets have been satisfied; |
• | there has been no material adverse effect with respect to Allkem; and |
• | Livent has sought and received an opinion of Davis Polk, or, if Davis Polk is unable or unwilling to provide such opinion, Sidley Austin, dated as of the sanction date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Livent, to the effect that, on the basis of facts, representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion and as of the date thereof, (i) either (A) the merger should qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code or (B) the merger and the scheme, taken together, should qualify as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code, and (ii) the transfer of Livent Shares (other than certain excluded shares) by Livent stockholders pursuant to the merger (other than by any Livent stockholder who is a U.S. person and would be a “five-percent transferee shareholder” (within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.367(a)-3(c)(5)(ii)) of NewCo following the merger that does not enter into a five-year gain recognition agreement in the form provided in Treasury Regulations Section 1.367(a)-8(c)) should qualify for an exception to Section 367(a)(1) of the Code. |
• | by either Livent or Allkem: |
• | if the Allkem Shareholder Approval is not obtained at the scheme meeting, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in each case at which a vote on such approval was taken (the “Allkem Shareholder Approval Failure Termination Right”); |
• | if the Livent Stockholder Approval is not obtained at the Livent Special Meeting, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in each case at which a vote on such approval was taken (the “Livent Stockholder Approval Failure Termination Right”); or |
• | if the Court declines or refuses to make any orders directing Allkem to convene the scheme meeting or declines or refuses to approve the scheme, and either (x) no appeal of the Court’s decision is made, or (y) on appeal, a court of competent jurisdiction issues a final and non-appealable ruling upholding the declination or refusal (as applicable) of the Court, and such outcome was not principally caused by a material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement set forth in the Transaction Agreement by the party seeking to terminate the Transaction Agreement. |
• | by Allkem: |
• | if Livent or a NewCo Party has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the Transaction Agreement, which breach or failure to perform (i) would cause the conditions to Allkem’s obligation to consummate the transaction relating to the accuracy of Livent’s representations and warranties and compliance with its covenants and agreements contained in the Transaction Agreement to not be satisfied, and (ii) is either incapable of being cured or is not cured by the earlier of (A) the end date and (B) 30 days following written notice by Allkem thereof (provided that Allkem is not then in breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained in the Transaction Agreement which breach would cause the conditions to Livent’s obligation to consummate the transaction relating to the accuracy of Allkem’s representations and warranties and compliance with its covenants and agreements contained in the Transaction Agreement to not be satisfied) (the “Allkem Material Breach Termination Right”); |
• | prior to the receipt of the Allkem Shareholder Approval, if there has occurred an Allkem Change of Recommendation in connection with a Superior Proposal; provided that prior to or concurrently with such termination Allkem pays or causes to be paid to Livent the Allkem Termination Fee (the “Allkem Change of Recommendation Termination Right”); |
• | prior to the receipt of the Allkem Shareholder Approval, if there has occurred an Allkem Change of Recommendation in response to an Intervening Event; provided that prior to or concurrently with such termination Allkem pays or causes to be paid to Livent the Allkem Termination Fee (the “Allkem Intervening Event Termination Right”); |
• | prior to the receipt of the Allkem Shareholder Approval, if there has occurred an Allkem Change of Recommendation due to an Independent Expert Event; provided that, in the case such Independent Expert Event is caused by the existence of a Competing Proposal, prior to or concurrently with such termination Allkem pays or causes to be paid to Livent the Allkem Termination Fee (the “Allkem Independent Expert Event Termination Right”); or |
• | if, prior to the receipt of the Livent Stockholder Approval, (i) the Livent Board effects a Livent Change of Recommendation, or (ii) an intentional and material breach by Livent of the covenant relating to calling the Livent Special Meeting for the purpose of obtaining the Livent Stockholder Approval has occurred (the “Allkem Adverse Change Termination Right”); |
• | by Livent: |
• | if Allkem has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements contained in the Transaction Agreement, which breach or failure to perform (i) would cause the conditions to Livent’s obligation to consummate the transaction relating to the accuracy of Allkem’s representations and warranties and compliance with its covenants and agreements contained in the Transaction Agreement to not be satisfied, and (ii) is either incapable of being cured or is not cured by the earlier of (A) the end date and (B) 30 days following written notice by Livent thereof (provided that any of Livent or a NewCo Party is not then in breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained in the Transaction Agreement which breach would cause the conditions to Allkem’s obligation to consummate the transaction relating to the accuracy of Livent’s representations and warranties and compliance with its covenants and agreements contained in the Transaction Agreement to not be satisfied) (the “Livent Material Breach Termination Right”); |
• | prior to the receipt of the Livent Stockholder Approval, if there has occurred a Livent Change of Recommendation in connection with a Superior Proposal; provided that prior to or concurrently with such termination Livent pays or causes to be paid to Allkem the Livent Termination Fee (the “Livent Change of Recommendation Termination Right”); |
• | prior to the receipt of the Livent Stockholder Approval, if there has occurred a Livent Change of Recommendation in response to an Intervening Event; provided that prior to or concurrently with such termination Livent pays or causes to be paid to Allkem the Livent Termination Fee (the “Livent Intervening Event Termination Right”); or |
• | if, prior to the receipt of the Allkem Shareholder Approval, (i) the Allkem Board effects an Allkem Change of Recommendation, or (ii) an intentional and material breach by Allkem of the covenant relating to applying for an order of the Court pursuant to the Australian Corporations Act to convene the scheme meeting and otherwise taking required steps to cause the scheme meeting to be called for the purpose of obtaining the Allkem Shareholder Approval has occurred (the “Livent Adverse Change Termination Right”). |
• | by mutual written consent of Livent and Allkem; or |
• | by either Livent or Allkem: |
• | if the scheme effectiveness has not occurred by 5:00 p.m. (AWST) on February 10, 2024 (subject to extension by either party until May 10, 2024 in order to obtain antitrust or investment screening law or other regulatory approvals), and such outcome was not principally caused by a material breach of certain covenants set forth in the Transaction Agreement by the party seeking to terminate the Transaction Agreement; or |
• | if (i) any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has issued a final and non-appealable order that is in effect and permanently restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the consummation of the merger or the scheme or (ii) any governmental entity having jurisdiction over a party has adopted a law that is in effect that permanently makes illegal or otherwise permanently prohibits the consummation of the merger or the scheme (and such outcome was not principally caused by a material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement set forth in the Transaction Agreement by the party seeking to terminate the Transaction Agreement). In the case of clause (ii) above, if such law arises out of or relates to antitrust laws or investment screening laws, such law will only result in a right to terminate the Transaction Agreement to the extent the violation or contravention of such law as in effect would reasonably be expected to result in criminal liability to any person, personal liability to any director or officer of Allkem, Merger Sub, NewCo, Livent or any of their respective subsidiaries, or a material adverse effect on NewCo and its subsidiaries following the effective time. |
• | by Allkem pursuant to the Allkem Adverse Change Termination Right; |
• | by Livent pursuant to the Livent Change of Recommendation Termination Right or the Livent Intervening Event Termination Right; or |
• | (i) by either Livent or Allkem pursuant to the End Date Termination Right or the Livent Stockholder Approval Failure Termination Right, or by Allkem pursuant to the Allkem Material Breach Termination Right following an intentional and material breach of a covenant by Livent, (ii) prior to such termination but after the date of the Transaction Agreement, a bona fide Competing Proposal has been publicly made to Livent or any of its subsidiaries, has been made directly to the Livent stockholders generally or otherwise has become public or any person has publicly announced an intention (whether or not conditional) to make a bona fide Competing Proposal to Livent or, in the case of termination by Allkem pursuant to the Allkem Material Breach Termination Right, a Competing Proposal has been made publicly or privately to the Livent Board, and (iii) within 12 months after the date of a termination in either of the cases referred to in the preceding clauses (i) and (ii), Livent consummates a Competing Proposal or enters into a definitive agreement providing for a Competing Proposal (provided that solely for purposes of this bullet, all references to “20% or more” in the definition of “Competing Proposal” will be deemed to be references to “more than 50%”). |
• | by Livent pursuant to the Livent Adverse Change Termination Right (other than in the event such Allkem Change of Recommendation is due to an Independent Expert Event); |
• | by Allkem pursuant to the Allkem Change of Recommendation Termination Right, the Allkem Intervening Event Termination Right or, if applicable, the Allkem Independent Expert Event Termination Right; or |
• | (i) by either Livent or Allkem pursuant to the End Date Termination Right or the Allkem Shareholder Approval Failure Termination Right, or by Livent pursuant to the Livent Material Breach Termination Right following an intentional and material breach of a covenant by Allkem, (ii) prior to such termination but after the date of the Transaction Agreement, a bona fide Competing Proposal has been publicly made to Allkem or any of its subsidiaries, has been made directly to the Allkem shareholders generally or otherwise has become public or any person has publicly announced an intention (whether or not conditional) to make a bona fide Competing Proposal to Allkem or, in the case of termination by Livent pursuant to the Livent Material Breach Termination Right, a Competing Proposal has been made publicly or privately to the Allkem Board, and (iii) within 12 months after the date of a termination in either of the cases referred to in the preceding clauses (i) and (ii), Allkem consummates a Competing Proposal or enters into a definitive agreement providing for a Competing Proposal (provided that solely for purposes of this bullet, all references to “20% or more” in the definition of “Competing Proposal” will be deemed to be references to “more than 50%”). |
• | The accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information; |
• | The separate audited financial statements of Livent as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes, included in Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus; |
• | The separate interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Livent as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2023, and the related notes, included in Livent’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2023, incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus; and |
• | The separate audited consolidated financial statements of Allkem as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, and the related notes, included in this proxy statement/prospectus. |
• | Each holder of outstanding unvested Allkem Performance Rights, whose role is not being made redundant through the execution of the transaction, will have their Allkem Performance Rights vest in the proportion determined by the Allkem Board provided that, in aggregate, no less than 60% and no more than 70% of the total number held by such Allkem employees will vest on the date of scheme effectiveness. Each vested Allkem Performance Right will be exchanged for an Allkem Share prior to the Scheme Record Date and be eligible to receive the scheme consideration. The remaining unvested Allkem Performance Rights will lapse at the time of the transaction and, as soon as practicable following the transaction, NewCo will issue replacement awards to the prior holders which will (i) be substantially comparable in value to the corresponding lapsed Allkem Performance Rights as at the date of scheme effectiveness, (ii) be in respect of NewCo Shares and (iii) if the employment of a holder of a replacement right is terminated as a result of redundancy in the 12 months following the transaction, vest in full upon such termination. Each holder of outstanding Allkem Performance Rights whose role will be made redundant through the execution of the transaction will have up to 100% of their awards vested, as determined by the Allkem Board, prior to the transaction. Each vested Allkem Performance Right will be exchanged for an Allkem Share prior to the Scheme Record Date and be eligible to receive the scheme consideration. The remaining unvested Allkem Performance Rights will lapse at the time of the transaction. For purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information, all holders of outstanding Allkem Performance Rights are assumed to hold roles that are not being made redundant. |
• | Unvested Livent RSUs will be assumed by NewCo then vest on a pro rata basis based on the number of days elapsed from the commencement date of the vesting period to the date of the merger compared to the original vesting period, rounded down to the nearest whole share. Unvested Livent RSUs assumed by NewCo shall be subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as the previous Livent Shares except for the right to receive NewCo shares upon vesting. Vested Livent RSUs at the time of the merger, including those so vested on a pro rata basis, will be canceled in exchange for the right to receive the merger consideration of 2.406 NewCo Shares per Livent RSU, plus any cash consideration related to fractional shares. |
• | Livent PSUs will vest in full based on the achievement of the higher of target or actual performance. Vested Livent PSUs at the time of the merger will be canceled in exchange for the right to receive the merger consideration of 2.406 NewCo Shares per Livent RSU, plus any cash consideration related to fractional shares. |
• | All Livent Options will be assumed by NewCo at substantially the same terms and conditions as prior to the merger, provided that the number of shares exercisable by each option and the exercise price of each option will be adjusted by the Merger Exchange Ratio. |
• | Livent Director RSUs will vest in full immediately prior to the merger. At the time of the merger, the awards will be cancelled and converted into a right to receive cash per award equal to the higher of (i) the first available closing price of the NewCo Share and (ii) closing price per Livent Share, as reported in the NYSE, on the last trading day preceding the merger date. |
• | NewCo is a shell company and was formed in contemplation and for the purpose of completing the transaction; |
• | Livent initiated the negotiation of the transaction; |
• | The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Livent will continue as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of NewCo and Livent’s other executive officer, Ms. Sara Ponessa, General Counsel, will continue to perform the same role for NewCo; |
• | Under the NewCo articles of association, the Chief Executive Officer has the authority to select NewCo’s officers other than those required to be elected by the NewCo board of directors; |
• | The NewCo board of directors will be split evenly with six nominees from each of Livent and Allkem with equal voting rights, and matters on which the NewCo board of directors is deadlocked will not be approved (in this regard, the appointment of Mr. Peter Coleman, who is Allkem’s current Chairman, as the Chair of the NewCo board of directors did not impact the analysis because NewCo’s Chair will not have any tie-breaking or other special voting powers or any ability to affect the voting powers of the other NewCo directors under NewCo’s articles of association); |
• | There was an implied approximately 14% premium (measured as the difference between the agreed Merger Exchange Ratio and the implied merger exchange ratio based on the prices of Allkem Shares and Livent Shares, using volume weighted average share prices over one month from April 10, 2023 through May 9, 2023, the day immediately prior to the date of the Transaction Agreement) to Allkem shareholders; |
• | Notwithstanding that former shareholders of Allkem will own approximately 56% of the NewCo Shares (either directly or through CDIs) compared to Livent stockholders owning approximately 44%, on a fully diluted basis, the shareholders of NewCo will be diffuse with no holder or group of holders having a significant voting or minority ownership, and, as discussed above, the NewCo board of directors representing the shareholders will be split evenly with six nominees from each of Livent and Allkem, and each director (including the Chair) will have equal voting rights; and |
• | Livent had a similar total market capitalization to Allkem prior to the announcement of the transaction, notwithstanding Allkem’s larger size in terms of assets, earnings and revenues as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
| | Livent’s Historical | | | Allkem’s Historical (Reclassified) Note 2 | | | IFRS to GAAP and Policy Adjustments | | | Note 3 | | | Purchase Accounting and Other Adjustments | | | Note 5 | | | Pro Forma Combined | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||
Current assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $167.8 | | | $821.4 | | | $— | | | | | $(6.1) | | | 5(a) | | | $983.1 | |
Trade receivables, net | | | 122.3 | | | 142.9 | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 265.2 | ||
Inventories, net | | | 197.8 | | | 126.5 | | | 5.0 | | | 3(h) | | | 111.4 | | | 5(b) | | | 440.7 |
Prepaid and other current assets | | | 44.8 | | | 30.9 | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 75.7 | ||
Total current assets | | | 532.7 | | | 1,121.7 | | | 5.0 | | | | | 105.3 | | | | | 1,764.7 | ||
Investments | | | 455.7 | | | 7.5 | | | 8.5 | | | 3(h) | | | 142.0 | | | 5(c) | | | 613.7 |
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation | | | 1,137.4 | | | 3,370.3 | | | (52.6) | | | 3(b),(c),(d),(g) | | | 1,217.9 | | | 5(d) | | | 5,673.0 |
Goodwill | | | — | | | 519.8 | | | — | | | | | 1,373.6 | | | 5(e) | | | 1,893.4 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 0.1 | | | 3.1 | | | — | | | 3(e),(f) | | | — | | | | | 3.2 | |
Right of use assets - operating leases, net | | | 6.8 | | | 40.8 | | | 3.1 | | | 3(c) | | | 9.3 | | | 5(f) | | | 60.0 |
Other assets | | | 151.1 | | | 154.2 | | | — | | | | | 6.4 | | | 5(b) | | | 311.7 | |
Total assets | | | $2,283.8 | | | $5,217.2 | | | $(36.0) | | | | | $2,854.5 | | | | | $10,319.5 | ||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | | | — | | | 42.5 | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 42.5 | ||
Accounts Payable, trade and other | | | 80.5 | | | 137.4 | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 217.9 | ||
Accrued and other current liabilities | | | 54.5 | | | 66.7 | | | 8.5 | | | 3(h) | | | 85.4 | | | 5(g) | | | 215.1 |
Environmental liabilities − current | | | — | | | 9.8 | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 9.8 | ||
Contract liability − short-term | | | 2.3 | | | — | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 2.3 | ||
Operating lease liabilities −current | | | 1.0 | | | 13.3 | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 14.3 | ||
Income taxes | | | 3.2 | | | 176.2 | | | 10.1 | | | 3(d),(h) | | | — | | | | | 189.5 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 141.5 | | | 445.8 | | | 18.6 | | | | | 85.4 | | | | | 691.3 | ||
Long-term debt | | | 242.7 | | | 231.8 | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 474.5 | ||
Operating lease liabilities − long-term | | | 6.0 | | | 39.9 | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 45.9 | ||
Environmental liabilities – long- term | | | 6.5 | | | — | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 6.5 | ||
Deferred income taxes | | | 18.5 | | | 849.4 | | | (9.7) | | | 3(b),(c),(d),(g) | | | 479.2 | | | 5(h) | | | 1,337.4 |
Contract liability − long-term | | | 198.0 | | | — | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 198.0 | ||
Other long-term liabilities | | | 17.6 | | | 76.5 | | | (34.9) | | | 3(b) | | | — | | | | | 59.2 | |
Commitments and contingent liabilities | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | — | ||
Total current and long-term liabilities | | | 630.8 | | | 1,643.4 | | | (26.0) | | | | | 564.6 | | | | | 2,812.8 | ||
Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||
Common stock | | | 0.1 | | | — | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 0.1 | ||
Capital in excess of par value of common stock | | | 1,164.3 | | | 2,686.1 | | | — | | | | | 2,677.7 | | | 5(i) | | | 6,528.1 | |
Retained earnings | | | 539.4 | | | 725.1 | | | (20.1) | | | 3(a),(b),(c),(d),(h) | | | (745.2) | | | 5(i) | | | 499.2 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (49.9) | | | (5.8) | | | 5.3 | | | 3(a),(b) | | | 0.5 | | | 5(i) | | | (49.9) |
Treasury stock, at cost | | | (0.9) | | | (2.3) | | | — | | | | | 2.3 | | | 5(i) | | | (0.9) | |
Non-controlling interests | | | — | | | 170.6 | | | 4.8 | | | 3(b),(c),(d),(h) | | | 354.6 | | | 5(j) | | | 530.0 |
Total equity | | | 1,653.0 | | | 3,573.8 | | | (10.0) | | | | | 2,289.9 | | | | | 7,506.7 | ||
Total liabilities and equity | | | $2,283.8 | | | $5,217.2 | | | $(36.0) | | | | | $2,854.5 | | | | | $10,319.5 |
| | Livent’s Historical | | | Allkem’s Historical (Reclassified) Note 2 | | | IFRS to GAAP and Policy Adjustments | | | Note 3 | | | Purchase Accounting and Other Adjustments | | | Note 6 | | | Pro Forma Combined | | | ||
Revenue | | | $489.3 | | | $649.9 | | | $— | | | | | $— | | | | | $1,139.2 | | | |||
Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Cost of sales | | | 179.9 | | | 176.4 | | | 4.3 | | | 3(b),(c), (d),(h) | | | 22.9 | | | 6(a) | | | 383.5 | | | |
Gross margin | | | 309.4 | | | 473.5 | | | (4.3) | | | | | (22.9) | | | | | 755.7 | | | |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 33.9 | | | 36.4 | | | 0.6 | | | 3(c) | | | 0.1 | | | 6(b) | | | 71.0 | | | |
Research and development expenses | | | 2.0 | | | — | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 2.0 | | | |||
Restructuring and other charges | | | 26.1 | | | 9.9 | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 36.0 | | | |||
Total costs and expenses | | | 241.9 | | | 222.7 | | | 4.9 | | | | | 23.0 | | | | | 492.5 | | | |||
Income/(loss) from operations before equity in net loss of unconsolidated affiliates, interest income, net, and other loss / (gain) | | | 247.4 | | | 427.2 | | | (4.9) | | | | | (23.0) | | | | | 646.7 | | | |||
Equity in net loss / (gain) of unconsolidated affiliates | | | 15.3 | | | (2.0) | | | (3.7) | | | 3(h) | | | — | | | | | 9.6 | | | ||
Interest income, net | | | — | | | (40.9) | | | (2.7) | | | 3(c) | | | — | | | | | (43.6) | | | ||
Other loss / (gain) | | | (11.4) | | | 18.7 | | | 1.7 | | | 3(a) | | | — | | | | | 9.0 | | | ||
Income from operations before income taxes | | | 243.5 | | | 451.4 | | | (0.2) | | | | | (23.0) | | | | | 671.7 | | | |||
Income tax expense | | | 38.5 | | | 149.4 | | | 0.4 | | | 3(d),(h) | | | (7.8) | | | 6(d) | | | 180.5 | | | |
Net income from continuing operations | | | $205.0 | | | $302.1 | | | $(0.6) | | | | | $(15.2) | | | | | $491.3 | | | |||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to non-controlling interests | | | — | | | 40.8 | | | 1.1 | | | 3(h) | | | (2.2) | | | 6(e) | | | 39.7 | | | |
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Livent/Allkem, respectively | | | $205.0 | | | $261.3 | | | $(1.7) | | | | | $(13.0) | | | | | $451.6 | | | |||
Net income per weighted average share − basic | | | $1.14 | | | $0.41 | | | | | | | | | | | $0.42 | | | |||||
Net income per weighted average share − diluted | | | $0.98 | | | $0.41 | | | | | | | | | | | $0.39 | | | |||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic | | | 179.6 | | | 637.4 | | | | | | | | | | | 1,075.5 | | | 6(f) | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding − diluted | | | 209.3 | | | 641.0 | | | | | | | | | | | 1,146.5 | | | 6(f) |
| | Livent’s Historical | | | Allkem’s Historical (Reclassified) Note 2 | | | IFRS to GAAP and Policy Adjustments | | | Note 3 | | | Purchase Accounting and Other Adjustments | | | Note 6 | | | Pro Forma Combined | ||
Revenue | | | $813.2 | | | $1,122.1 | | | $— | | | | | $— | | | | | $1,935.3 | |||
Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Costs of sales | | | 417.5 | | | 316.4 | | | 13.1 | | | 3(c),(d),(h) | | | 125.3 | | | 6(a) | | | 872.3 | |
Gross margin | | | 395.7 | | | 805.7 | | | (13.1) | | | | | (125.3) | | | | | 1,063.0 | |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 55.2 | | | 56.3 | | | 0.7 | | | 3(c) | | | 7.4 | | | 6(b) | | | 119.6 | |
Research and development expenses | | | 3.9 | | | 0.5 | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 4.4 | |||
Restructuring and other charges | | | 7.5 | | | — | | | — | | | | | 85.4 | | | 6(c) | | | 92.9 | ||
Separation-related costs/(income) | | | 0.7 | | | — | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 0.7 | |||
Total costs and expenses | | | 484.8 | | | 373.2 | | | 13.8 | | | | | 218.1 | | | | | 1,089.9 | |||
Income/(loss) from operations before equity in net loss of unconsolidated affiliates, interest income, net, loss on debt extinguishment, and other loss / (gain) | | | 328.4 | | | 748.9 | | | (13.8) | | | | | (218.1) | | | | | 845.4 | |||
Equity in net loss (gain) of unconsolidated affiliates | | | 15.1 | | | 6.2 | | | (4.8) | | | 3(h) | | | — | | | | | 16.5 | ||
Interest income, net | | | — | | | (10.9) | | | (5.3) | | | 3(c) | | | — | | | | | (16.2) | ||
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | 0.1 | | | — | | | — | | | | | — | | | | | 0.1 | |||
Other loss / (gain) | | | (22.2) | | | (10.8) | | | 2.2 | | | 3(a) | | | — | | | | | (30.8) | ||
Income/(loss) from operations before income taxes | | | 335.4 | | | 764.4 | | | (5.9) | | | | | (218.1) | | | | | 875.8 | |||
Income tax expense/(benefit) | | | 61.9 | | | 219.7 | | | (1.4) | | | 3(d),(h) | | | (47.3) | | | 6(d) | | | 232.9 | |
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations | | | $273.5 | | | $544.6 | | | $(4.5) | | | | | $(170.8) | | | | | $642.8 | |||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to non-controlling interests | | | — | | | 74.0 | | | 0.3 | | | 3(h) | | | (24.4) | | | 6(e) | | | 49.9 | |
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Livent/Allkem, respectively | | | $273.5 | | | $470.6 | | | $(4.8) | | | | | $(146.4) | | | | | $592.9 | |||
Net income/(loss) per weighted average share − basic | | | $1.59 | | | $0.74 | | | | | | | | | | | $0.55 | |||||
Net income/(loss) per weighted average share − diluted | | | $1.36 | | | $0.74 | | | | | | | | | | | $0.52 | |||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding − basic | | | 171.8 | | | 637.4 | | | | | | | | | | | 1,075.5 | 6(f) | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding − diluted | | | 201.6 | | | 639.8 | | | | | | | | | | | 1,146.5 | 6(f) |
• | The Pro Forma Balance Sheet is presented as if Livent’s acquisition of Allkem had occurred on June 30, 2023, and combines the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet of Livent as of June 30, 2023 with the audited consolidated balance sheet of Allkem as of June 30, 2023. |
• | The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the Pro Forma Interim Period has been prepared as if the transaction had occurred on January 1, 2022 and combines Livent’s unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2023 with Allkem’s unaudited interim consolidated income statement for the six months ended June 30, 2023. Allkem’s unaudited interim consolidated income statement for the six months ended June 30, 2023 is calculated as the audited consolidated statement of profit or loss for the year ended June 30, 2023, less the unaudited interim consolidated income statement for the six months ended December 31, 2022. |
• | The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the Pro Forma Annual Period has been prepared as if the transaction had occurred on January 1, 2022 and combines Livent’s audited consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 with Allkem’s unaudited consolidated statement of profit or loss for the twelve months ended December 31, 2022. Allkem’s unaudited consolidated statement of profit or loss for the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 is calculated as the audited consolidated statement of profit or loss for the year ended June 30, 2022, less the unaudited interim consolidated income statement for the six months ended December 31, 2021, plus the unaudited interim consolidated income statement for the six months ended December 31, 2022. |
Allkem Historical Financial Statement Line Item | | | Allkem as of June 30, 2023 | | | Reclassifications | | | Note | | | Allkem Historical Reclassified Amount | | | Livent Financial Statement Line |
(in millions) | | ||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2023 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 821.4 | | | — | | | | | 821.4 | | | Cash and cash equivalents | |
Trade and other receivables | | | 142.9 | | | — | | | | | 142.9 | | | Trade receivables, net | |
Inventory | | | 126.5 | | | — | | | | | 126.5 | | | Inventories, net | |
Prepayments | | | 30.9 | | | — | | | | | 30.9 | | | Prepaid and other current assets | |
Current Assets | | | 1,121.7 | | | — | | | | | 1,121.7 | | | Current Assets | |
Other receivables | | | 42.7 | | | (42.7) | | | (a) | | | — | | | Other assets |
Inventory | | | 86.7 | | | (86.7) | | | (a) | | | — | | | Other assets |
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | | | 3.5 | | | 4.0 | | | (b) | | | 7.5 | | | Investments |
Other financial assets | | | 21.4 | | | (21.4) | | | (a) | | | — | | | Other assets |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 2,943.5 | | | 426.8 | | | (c),(d) | | | 3,370.3 | | | Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
Intangible assets | | | 520.5 | | | (0.7) | | | (e) | | | 519.8 | | | Goodwill |
— | | | — | | | 40.8 | | | (c) | | | 40.8 | | | Right of use assets – operating leases, net |
Exploration and evaluation assets | | | 467.6 | | | (467.6) | | | (d) | | | — | | | Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
Investment in associates | | | 4.0 | | | (4.0) | | | (b) | | | — | | | Investments |
Other non-current assets | | | 2.7 | | | 151.5 | | | (a),(e) | | | 154.2 | | | Other assets |
Deferred tax assets | | | 3.1 | | | — | | | | | 3.1 | | | Deferred income taxes | |
Non-Current Assets | | | 4,095.5 | | | — | | | | | 4,095.5 | | | Non-Current Assets | |
Total Assets | | | 5,271.2 | | | — | | | | | 5,217.2 | | | Total Assets | |
Trade and other payables | | | 137.4 | | | — | | | | | 137.4 | | | Accounts payable, trade and other | |
Loans and borrowings | | | 42.5 | | | — | | | | | 42.5 | | | Current portion of long-term debt | |
Provisions | | | 13.9 | | | (13.9) | | | (f) | | | — | | | Accrued and other current liabilities |
— | | | — | | | 9.8 | | | (f) | | | 9.8 | | | Environmental liabilities − current |
Lease liabilities | | | 13.3 | | | — | | | | | 13.3 | | | Operating lease liabilities – current | |
Income tax payable | | | 176.2 | | | — | | | | | 176.2 | | | Income taxes | |
Other liabilities | | | 62.6 | | | 4.1 | | | (f) | | | 66.7 | | | Accrued and other current liabilities |
Current Liabilities | | | 445.8 | | | — | | | | | 445.8 | | | Current Liabilities | |
Other payables | | | 29.0 | | | (29.0) | | | (g) | | | — | | | Other long-term liabilities |
Loans and borrowings | | | 231.8 | | | — | | | | | 231.8 | | | Long-term debt | |
Provisions | | | 47.5 | | | (47.5) | | | (g) | | | — | | | Other long-term liabilities |
Allkem Historical Financial Statement Line Item | | | Allkem as of June 30, 2023 | | | Reclassifications | | | Note | | | Allkem Historical Reclassified Amount | | | Livent Financial Statement Line |
(in millions) | | ||||||||||||||
Lease liabilities | | | 39.9 | | | — | | | | | 39.9 | | | Operating lease liabilities – long-term | |
— | | | — | | | 76.5 | | | (g) | | | 76.5 | | | Other long-term liabilities |
Deferred tax liability | | | 849.4 | | | — | | | | | 849.4 | | | Deferred income taxes | |
Non-Current Liabilities | | | 1,197.6 | | | — | | | | | 1,197.6 | | | Non-Current Liabilities | |
Total Liabilities | | | 1,643.4 | | | — | | | | | 1,643.4 | | | Total Liabilities | |
Net Assets | | | 3,573.8 | | | — | | | | | 3,573.8 | | | Net Assets | |
Issued capital | | | 2,686.1 | | | — | | | | | 2,686.1 | | | Capital in excess of par value of common stock | |
Reserves | | | (5.8) | | | — | | | | | (5.8) | | | Accumulated other comprehensive loss | |
Retained earnings | | | 725.1 | | | — | | | | | 725.1 | | | Retained earnings | |
Treasury shares | | | (2.3) | | | — | | | | | (2.3) | | | Treasury stock, at cost | |
Equity attributable to non-controlling interests | | | 170.6 | | | — | | | | | 170.6 | | | Non-controlling interests | |
Total Equity | | | 3,573.8 | | | — | | | | | 3,573.8 | | | Total Equity |
(a) | Other receivables of $42.7 million, inventory (non-current) of $86.7 million, and other financial assets of $21.4 million have been reclassified to other non-current assets to conform with Livent’s presentation. |
(b) | Investment in associates of $4.0 million has been reclassified to Investments to conform with Livent’s presentation. |
(c) | Right of use assets of $40.8 million have been reclassified from property, plant and equipment to a separate right of use assets – operating leases, net line item on the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet. |
(d) | Exploration and evaluation assets of $467.6 million have been reclassified to property, plant and equipment to conform with Livent’s presentation. |
(e) | Capitalized software of $0.7 million has been reclassified from intangible assets to other non-current assets. The residual balance of intangible assets is goodwill related to the Galaxy/Orocobre Merger and has been reclassified as a separate goodwill financial statement line item accordingly. |
(f) | Provisions (current) of $4.1 million have been reclassified to accrued and other current liabilities. The remaining balance of provisions (current) of $9.8 million was reclassified to environmental liabilities — current. |
(g) | Other payables of $29.0 million, and provisions (non-current) of $47.5 million have been reclassified to other long-term liabilities. |
Allkem Historical Financial Statement Line Item | | | Allkem for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 | | | Reclassifications | | | Note | | | Allkem Historical Reclassified Amount | | | Livent Financial Statement Line |
(in millions) | | ||||||||||||||
Income Statement for six months ended June 30, 2023 | |||||||||||||||
Revenue | | | 649.9 | | | — | | | | | 649.9 | | | Revenue | |
Cost of sales | | | 46.2 | | | 130.2 | | | (h),(i), (j),(l) | | | 176.4 | | | Cost of sales |
Gross Profit | | | 603.7 | | | (130.2) | | | | | 473.5 | | | Gross margin | |
Other income | | | (38.1) | | | 56.8 | | | (k) | | | 18.7 | | | Other loss / (gain) |
Corporate and administrative expenses | | | 37.0 | | | (1.4) | | | (h) | | | 35.6 | | | Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Acquisition and merger costs | | | 9.9 | | | — | | | | | 9.9 | | | Restructuring and other charges | |
Selling expenses | | | 58.5 | | | (58.5) | | | (i) | | | — | | | Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Allkem Historical Financial Statement Line Item | | | Allkem for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 | | | Reclassifications | | | Note | | | Allkem Historical Reclassified Amount | | | Livent Financial Statement Line |
(in millions) | | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | | | 66.6 | | | (65.8) | | | (j) | | | 0.8 | | | Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Share of net profit/loss of associates | | | (2.0) | | | — | | | | | (2.0) | | | Equity in net loss of unconsolidated affiliates | |
Foreign currency gain/loss | | | 56.8 | | | (56.8) | | | (k) | | | — | | | Other loss / (gain) |
Profit before interest and income tax | | | 415.0 | | | (4.5) | | | | | 410.5 | | | — | |
Finance income | | | (50.0) | | | — | | | | | (50.0) | | | Interest income, net | |
Finance costs | | | 13.6 | | | (4.5) | | | (l) | | | 9.1 | | | Interest income, net |
Profit before income tax | | | 451.4 | | | — | | | | | 451.4 | | | Income from operations before income taxes | |
Income Tax Expense / (Benefit) | | | 149.4 | | | — | | | | | 149.4 | | | Income tax expense/(benefit) | |
Profit after taxation from continuing operations | | | 302.1 | | | — | | | | | 302.1 | | | Net income/(loss) from continuing operations |
(h) | Share based payments related to operations staff of $1.4 million have been reclassified to cost of sales. Remaining corporate and administrative expenses of $35.6 million have been presented as selling, general and administrative expenses. |
(i) | Royalties of $26.6 million, export duties of $11.9 million and dispatching and logistics of $20.0 million previously included in selling expenses are directly related to operations and have been reclassified to cost of sales. |
(j) | Depreciation and amortization of $65.8 million which are directly attributable to Allkem’s operations have been reclassified to cost of sales. The remaining $0.8 million of depreciation relates to corporate assets and has been presented in selling, general and administrative expenses. |
(k) | Foreign currency gains and losses of $56.8 million have been reclassified to other loss / (gain). |
(l) | Finance costs of $3.3 million related to a loss on current and non-current Value Added Tax (“VAT”) recoveries and $1.2 million of accretion expenditure related to Allkem’s rehabilitation provision have been reclassified to cost of sales. |
Allkem Historical Financial Statement Line Item | | | Allkem for the Year Ended December 31, 2022 | | | Reclassifications | | | Note | | | Allkem Historical Reclassified Amount | | | Livent Financial Statement Line |
(in millions) | | ||||||||||||||
Income Statement for the year ended December 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Revenue | | | 1,122.1 | | | — | | | | | 1,122.1 | | | Revenue | |
Cost of sales | | | 169.5 | | | 146.9 | | | (m),(o), (p),(r) | | | 316.4 | | | Cost of sales |
Gross Profit | | | 952.6 | | | (146.9) | | | | | 805.7 | | | Gross margin | |
Other income | | | (47.2) | | | 36.4 | | | (q) | | | (10.8) | | | Other loss / (gain) |
Corporate and administrative | | | 57.6 | | | (2.7) | | | (m),(n) | | | 54.9 | | | Selling, general and administrative expenses |
— | | | — | | | 0.5 | | | (n) | | | 0.5 | | | Research and development expenses |
Selling expenses | | | 79.2 | | | (79.2) | | | (o) | | | — | | | Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Depreciation and amortization expenses | | | 63.6 | | | (62.4) | | | (p) | | | 1.2 | | | Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Asset impairment and write-downs | | | 0.2 | | | — | | | | | 0.2 | | | Selling, general and administrative expenses | |
Share of net profit/loss of associates | | | 6.2 | | | — | | | | | 6.2 | | | Equity in net loss of unconsolidated affiliates |
Allkem Historical Financial Statement Line Item | | | Allkem for the Year Ended December 31, 2022 | | | Reclassifications | | | Note | | | Allkem Historical Reclassified Amount | | | Livent Financial Statement Line |
(in millions) | | ||||||||||||||
Foreign currency gain/loss | | | 36.4 | | | (36.4) | | | (q) | | | — | | | Other loss / (gain) |
Profit before interest and income tax | | | 756.6 | | | (3.1) | | | | | 753.5 | | | — | |
Finance income | | | (26.5) | | | — | | | | | (26.5) | | | Interest income, net | |
Finance costs | | | 18.7 | | | (3.1) | | | (r) | | | 15.6 | | | Interest income, net |
Profit before income tax | | | 764.4 | | | — | | | | | 764.4 | | | Income from operations before income taxes | |
Income Tax Expense | | | 219.7 | | | — | | | | | 219.7 | | | Income tax expense/(benefit) | |
Profit after taxation from continuing operations | | | 544.6 | | | — | | | | | 544.6 | | | Net income/(loss) from continuing operations |
(m) | Share based payments related to operational staff of $2.2 million have been reclassified to cost of sales. Remaining corporate and administrative expenses of $54.9 million have been presented as selling, general and administrative expenses. |
(n) | Research and development costs of $0.5 million have been reclassified from corporate and administrative expenses to a separate line item in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations. |
(o) | Royalties of $44.9 million, export duties of $15.3 million and dispatching and logistics of $19.0 million previously included in selling expenses are directly related to operations and have been reclassified to cost of sales. |
(p) | Depreciation and amortization of $62.4 million which are directly attributable to Allkem’s operations has been reclassified to cost of sales. The remaining $1.2 million of depreciation relates to corporate assets and has been presented in selling, general and administrative expenses. |
(q) | Foreign currency gains and losses of $36.4 million have been reclassified to other loss / (gain). |
(r) | Finance costs of $3.0 million related to a loss on current and non-current VAT recoveries and $0.1 million of accretion expenditure related to Allkem’s rehabilitation provision have been reclassified to cost of sales. |
a. | Allkem has designated certain financial assets to be measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVOCI”). Under GAAP, those financial assets will be recognized at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”). |
i. | Balance sheet impact: Cumulative losses of $6.4 million were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date. There were no changes to the carrying amount of the financial assets on the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet. |
ii. | Income statement impact: The amount reclassified from other comprehensive income to other loss / (gain) was a loss of $1.7 million and a loss of $2.2 million for the Pro Forma Interim Period and the Pro Forma Annual Period, respectively. |
b. | Allkem’s asset retirement obligations (“AROs” or rehabilitation provisions as disclosed in Allkem’s Financial Report for the Year Ended June 30, 2023 (the “Allkem 2023 Annual Report”)) were discounted using risk-free rates under IFRS. These obligations have been remeasured using a credit adjusted discount |
i. | Balance sheet impact: AROs included within other long-term liabilities decreased by $34.9 million and the related AROs included within property, plant and equipment decreased $34.6 million as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date. A corresponding adjustment to deferred taxes was made to decrease deferred income tax liabilities of $11.3 million. In addition, cumulative adjustments of an increase to retained earnings of $9.7 million and a decrease of $1.1 million of accumulated other comprehensive loss as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date were recorded. An increase in non-controlling interests of $3.0 million associated with these balance sheet adjustments was also recorded. |
ii. | Income statement impact: The change resulted in a decrease to accretion expense of $0.1 million and nil, and a decrease to depreciation of $0.1 million and nil both recorded in cost of sales for the Pro Forma Interim Period and the Pro Forma Annual Period, respectively, resulting in a net impact of a decrease of $0.2 million and nil in cost of sales for the Pro Forma Interim Period and Pro Forma Annual Period, respectively. |
c. | Allkem, in its capacity as a lessee, adopted a single model for lease accounting under IFRS and has remeasured its leases in accordance with GAAP. Under GAAP, Allkem has reclassified all of its leases as operating leases based on their contractual terms and conditions. The following adjustments have been made for Allkem’s operating leases under GAAP: |
i. | Balance sheet impact: |
A. | Right of use assets were increased by $3.1 million as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date and previously capitalized depreciation of $0.5 million was deducted from property, plant and equipment, due to different methods of depreciation for operating lease right of use assets under GAAP and the single lessee model under IFRS; |
B. | Cumulative adjustments relating to the balances of right of use assets and liabilities of $1.1 million were recognized directly as an increase in retained earnings as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date; and |
C. | An increase in deferred income tax liabilities of $0.9 million and an increase in non-controlling interests of $0.6 million associated with these balance sheet adjustments were recorded. |
ii. | Income statement impact: |
A. | Previously recognized finance costs of $2.6 million for the Pro Forma Interim Period and $5.2 million for the Pro Forma Annual Period were reclassified to cost of sales and $0.1 million of finance costs for both the Pro Forma Interim Period and the Pro Forma Annual Period were reclassified to selling, general and administrative expenses. These reclassifications were made based on the nature and use of the underlying leased assets; |
B. | In addition, a further reclassification of depreciation expense from cost of sales to selling, general and administrative expenses of $0.5 million for the Pro Forma Interim Period and $0.6 million for the Pro Forma Annual Period, was made based on the nature and use of the underlying leased assets; and |
C. | An additional impact of the adoption of GAAP from IFRS was a nil and $0.1 million reduction to cost of sales in the Pro Forma Interim Period and Pro Forma Annual Period and represents the difference in the method of depreciation for operating lease right of use assets under GAAP and the single lessee model under IFRS. |
d. | Allkem capitalizes exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) expenditure on a full cost basis under the IFRS framework. Under GAAP, E&E expenditure is capitalized under a successful efforts basis, that is, when proven and probable reserves are established for the sites where E&E activities are being performed. E&E assets recognized as part of business combinations continue to be capitalized, which represents the majority of Allkem’s E&E assets from the Galaxy/Orocobre Merger in August 2021. |
i. | Balance sheet impact: An adjustment of $28.0 million recognized as a decrease in property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and a decrease to retained earnings of $26.4 million has been recorded related to prior period amounts that were previously capitalized on the Pro Forma Balance Sheet. A corresponding adjustment of $8.4 million was recognized in current income taxes related to the decrease in deferred income tax liabilities of $9.8 million. A decrease in non-controlling interests of $0.2 million associated with these balance sheet adjustments was recorded. |
ii. | Income statement impact: E&E assets of $3.9 million and $3.6 million which were previously capitalized have been recognized as an expense within cost of sales for the Pro Forma Interim Period and the Pro Forma Annual Period, respectively. Incremental tax benefit of $1.4 million for the Pro Forma Interim Period and $1.3 million for the Pro Forma Annual Period related to the impact of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations adjustment. |
e. | Allkem has not recognized any deferred tax assets in relation to its investment in the Toyotsu Lithium Corporation (“TLC”) based on the probability of realizing benefits associated with the deferred tax assets. |
i. | Balance sheet impact: Under GAAP, gross deferred tax assets of $0.8 million, with an offsetting valuation allowance of $0.8 million, were recognized as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date, resulting in a net nil impact on deferred income taxes. |
f. | Allkem has not recognized any deferred tax assets in relation to tax losses for its Canadian operations based on the likelihood of future profitability in that jurisdiction |
i. | Balance sheet impact: Under GAAP, gross deferred tax assets of $16.2 million, with an offsetting valuation allowance of $16.2 million, were recognized as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date, resulting in a net nil impact on deferred income taxes. |
g. | Allkem acquired a mining tenement through an asset swap, with a net cash outflow of $0.4 million. The deferred tax implications of this asset swap were exempt for IFRS purposes. Under GAAP, the deferred tax implication of the asset acquisition has been recognized using the simultaneous equation method. |
i. | Balance sheet impact: Under GAAP, additional deferred tax liabilities of $10.5 million, with a corresponding increase to property, plant and equipment, were recognized as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date. |
h. | While not a difference between the GAAP and IFRS frameworks, Livent uses the first in first out (“FIFO”) method for inventory costing, while Allkem uses the weighted average cost (“WAC”) method resulting in a policy difference. |
i. | Balance sheet impact: |
A. | An increase of $8.5 million was recorded in accrued and other current liabilities as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date and a corresponding $8.5 million increase to Allkem’s investment in TLC as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date as a result of the use of FIFO which increased the cost of TLC inventory described in more detail in the income statement impact below. |
B. | An increase of $5.0 million was recorded in inventory as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date and a corresponding increase of $1.7 million in current income taxes was recorded as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date as a result of using FIFO which impacts the cost of inventory for Sales |
ii. | Income statement impact: |
A. | Under FIFO, the cost of TLC inventory increased by $8.5 million as of the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date and results in a corresponding reduction in TLC’s cost of sales of $3.7 million and $4.8 million for the Pro Forma Interim Period and Pro Forma Annual Period, respectively. The net flow on impact for Allkem is a reduction in its equity accounted share of the loss from the associate of $3.7 million for the Pro Forma Interim Period and $4.8 million for the Pro Forma Annual Period. The increase in cost of TLC’s inventory at the Pro Forma Balance Sheet date effects realized profits from the sale of inventory between TLC and Allkem. The reduction in Allkem’s equity accounted share of the loss from the associate of $3.7 million and $4.8 million resulted in an increase of $3.7 million and $4.8 million in Allkem’s elimination adjustment for unrealized profits from the sale of inventory between TLC and Allkem recorded in cost of sales for the Pro Forma Interim Period and the Pro Forma Annual Period, respectively. |
B. | Under FIFO, the cost of inventory for Sales De Jujuy and Mt Cattlin combined, decreased by $5.2 million and increased by $0.2 million for the Pro Forma Interim Period and Pro Forma Annual Period, respectively. Incremental tax expense of $1.8 million for the Pro Forma Interim Period and incremental tax benefit of $0.1 million for the Pro Forma Annual Period and an increase in income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $1.1 million for the Pro Forma Interim Period and $0.3 million for the Pro Forma Annual Period related to the net impact of this unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations adjustment. |
(in millions, except per share amounts) | | | Amount |
Total Allkem Shares subject to exchange as of June 30, 2023 | | | 637.7 |
Adjusted share price of Livent Shares as of September 15, 2023(i) | | | $8.39 |
Estimated value of NewCo Shares issued to Allkem shareholders | | | $5,350.3 |
Estimated converted Allkem Performance Rights attributable to pre-combination service(ii) | | | $19.6 |
Preliminary estimated aggregate transaction consideration | | | $5,369.9 |
(i) | As the calculation is deemed to reflect the capital increase of the accounting acquirer, the share price of Livent Shares is adjusted by dividing the share price of Livent Shares by the Merger Exchange Ratio (i.e., 2.406 NewCo Shares per Livent Share), or $20.18 divided by 2.406, resulting in $8.39, in order to reflect the value of Livent Shares that Allkem shareholders would receive if Livent were to issue its own shares. |
(ii) | As discussed in “—Description of the Transaction” above, certain Allkem Performance Rights will be replaced by NewCo’s equity awards with similar terms. Amount represents the estimated consideration attributable to pre-combination service for settlement or replacement of Allkem’s outstanding Allkem Performance Rights, specifically (A) the fair value related to Allkem Performance Rights vested but unexercised exchanged into an Allkem Share immediately prior to the transaction, (B) the fair value attributable to pre-combination services for unvested Allkem Performance Rights accelerated pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, and (C) the fair value attributable to pre-combination services for unvested Allkem Performance Rights replaced by NewCo’s equity awards with similar terms. The portion of the fair value of NewCo equity awards not included in consideration transferred represents compensation expense of the combined entity based on the vesting terms of the converted awards. |
| | Stock Price | | | Total Estimated Consideration | |
| | | | (in millions) | ||
10% increase | | | $22.20 | | | $5,905.6 |
10% decrease | | | $18.16 | | | $4,834.2 |
(in millions) | | | Amount |
Total estimated preliminary aggregate transaction consideration | | | $5,369.9 |
| | ||
Assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $821.4 |
Trade receivables | | | 142.9 |
Inventories, net(i) | | | 242.9 |
Prepaid and other current assets | | | 30.9 |
Investments | | | 158.0 |
Property, plant and equipment(ii) | | | 4,535.6 |
Deferred income taxes | | | 3.1 |
Right of use assets - operating leases, net | | | 53.2 |
Other assets(i) | | | 160.6 |
Total assets acquired | | | $6,148.4 |
| | ||
Liabilities: | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | | 42.5 |
Accounts payable, trade and other | | | 137.4 |
Accrued and other current liabilities | | | 120.4 |
Operating lease liabilities - current | | | 13.3 |
Income taxes | | | 186.3 |
Long-term debt | | | 231.8 |
Operating lease liabilities - long-term | | | 39.9 |
Environmental liabilities | | | 9.8 |
Deferred income taxes | | | 1,318.9 |
(in millions) | | | Amount |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 41.6 |
Total liabilities assumed | | | $2,141.9 |
Estimated preliminary fair value of net assets acquired | | | $4,006.5 |
Add: Estimated preliminary fair value of noncontrolling interests acquired | | | 530.0 |
Goodwill | | | $1,893.4 |
(i) | Includes preliminary fair value of inventories totaling $336.0 million, of which $242.9 million is classified as current and $93.1 million is classified as non-current. Brine inventory is classified as non-current if the brine will not be processed and sold within 12 months after the balance sheet date. A 25% change in the valuation of inventories would cause a corresponding increase or decrease in the adjustment to cost of sales of approximately $0.3 million for the Pro Forma Interim Period and $27.9 million for the Pro Forma Annual Period. The fair value of the inventory is preliminary and is subject to change. The fair value of inventory was estimated using the comparative sales method, which relies on certain key inputs and judgments including expected sales price of the inventory, percentage complete of the work-in-process inventory, estimated costs of completion and disposal of the inventory, and forecasted profit margins earned on the sale of the inventory. Changes in these inputs could have a significant impact on the inventory valuation. The impact on cost of sales following the transaction may differ significantly between periods based upon the final value assigned for inventory. |
(ii) | Includes preliminary fair value of mineral rights totaling $3,170.0 million and non-mineral rights property, plant and equipment totaling $1,365.6 million. Mineral rights (including evaluation and exploration assets as disclosed in the Allkem 2023 Annual Report) are classified within property, plant and equipment as mining properties on the unaudited condensed combined balance sheet. |
(a) | Reflects cash settlement of outstanding Livent Director RSUs, as described in “—Description of the Transaction” above. |
(b) | Reflects the preliminary purchase accounting adjustment for inventories, net based on the acquisition method of accounting. |
(in millions) | | | Amount |
Pro forma transaction accounting adjustments: | | | |
Elimination of Allkem’s inventories - carrying value | | | $(218.2) |
Preliminary fair value of acquired inventories | | | 336.0 |
Net pro forma transaction accounting adjustment to inventories | | | $117.8 |
(c) | Reflects the preliminary purchase accounting adjustment for Allkem’s investment in TLC. |
(in millions) | | | Amount |
Pro forma transaction accounting adjustments: | | | |
Elimination of Allkem’s historical carrying value of investment in TLC | | | $(16.0) |
Preliminary fair value of equity method investment in TLC | | | 158.0 |
Net pro forma transaction accounting adjustment to investment in TLC | | | $142.0 |
(d) | Reflects the preliminary purchase accounting adjustment for property, plant and equipment based on the acquisition method of accounting. |
(in millions) | | | Amount |
Pro forma transaction accounting adjustments: | | | |
Elimination of Allkem’s historical net book value of property, plant & equipment | | | $(3,317.7) |
Preliminary fair value of acquired property, plant & equipment(i) | | | 4,535.6 |
Net pro forma transaction accounting adjustment to property, plant & equipment, net of accumulated depreciation | | | $1,217.9 |
(i) | Includes fair value of both mineral rights and non-mineral right property, plant and equipment as described above in Note 4. |
(e) | Preliminary goodwill adjustment of $1,373.6 million which represents the elimination of historical goodwill and excess of the estimated aggregate transaction consideration over the preliminary fair value of the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed. |
(in millions) | | | Amount |
Pro forma transaction accounting adjustments: | | | |
Elimination of Allkem’s historical goodwill | | | $(519.8) |
Goodwill per purchase price allocation (Note 4) | | | 1,893.4 |
Net pro forma transaction accounting adjustment to goodwill | | | $1,373.6 |
(f) | Reflects the preliminary purchase accounting adjustment to right of use assets of $9.3 million, to measure the operating lease right of use assets at the same amount as the associated lease liability in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting. The calculated value is preliminary and subject to change and could vary materially from the final purchase price allocation. |
(g) | The pro forma adjustment for accrued and other current liabilities represents: (i) $40.2 million of estimated transaction-related costs to be incurred by Livent which have not yet been reflected in the historical consolidated financial statements of Livent and (ii) $45.2 million of estimated transaction-related costs to be incurred by Allkem which have not yet been reflected in the historical consolidated financial statements of Allkem. |
(h) | Represents the adjustment to deferred tax liability of $479.2 million associated with the incremental differences in the book and tax basis created from the preliminary purchase allocation, primarily resulting from the preliminary fair value of property, plant and equipment and inventory. These adjustments were based on the applicable statutory tax rate with respect to the estimated purchase price allocation. The effective tax rate of NewCo could be significantly different (either higher or lower) depending on post-transaction activities, including cash needs, the geographical mix of income and changes in tax law. Because the tax rates used for the pro forma financial information are estimated, the blended rate will likely vary from the actual effective rate in periods subsequent to completion of the transaction. This determination is preliminary and subject to change based upon the final determination of the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities. |
(i) | Reflects the adjustments to shareholders’ equity: |
(in millions) | | | Common equity | | | Capital in excess of par value of common equity | | | Retained earnings | | | Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | Treasury stock, at cost |
Elimination of Allkem’s historical equity | | | $— | | | $(2,686.1) | | | $(705.0) | | | $0.5 | | | $2.3 |
NewCo Shares and replacement awards issued to Allkem shareholders | | | — | | | 5,369.9 | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Acceleration and cash settlement of Livent Director RSUs | | | — | | | (6.1) | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Estimated transaction costs(i) | | | — | | | — | | | (40.2) | | | — | | | — |
Net pro forma transaction accounting adjustments to equity | | | $— | | | $2,677.7 | | | $(745.2) | | | $0.5 | | | $2.3 |
(i) | Represents estimated transaction-related costs that are not currently reflected in the historical consolidated financial statements of Livent; these estimated transaction costs consist primarily of advisor fees, legal fees, and accounting fees. It is assumed that these costs will not affect the condensed combined statements of operations beyond twelve months after the closing date of the transaction. The balance excludes $45.2 million of estimated transaction costs to be incurred by Allkem as a result of the transaction, which were not reflected in the Allkem 2023 Annual Report. These costs will be recognized as an expense in Allkem’s pre-combination income statement and therefore they are reflected as a liability assumed by Livent, and do not impact the statement of operations of the combined entity. |
(j) | Reflects the preliminary purchase accounting adjustment related to Allkem’s non-controlling interest. |
(in millions) | | | Amount |
Pro forma transaction accounting adjustments: | | | |
Elimination of Allkem’s historical non-controlling interests | | | $(175.4) |
Preliminary fair value of acquired non-controlling interests | | | 530.0 |
Net pro forma transaction accounting adjustments to non-controlling interests | | | $354.6 |
(a) | Reflects the adjustments to cost of sales which includes the following components: |
(in millions) | | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 | | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Pro forma transaction accounting adjustments: | | | | | ||
Inventory step-up flowing through cost of sales(i) | | | $1.2 | | | $111.4 |
Property, plant and equipment depreciation step-up(ii) | | | 21.2 | | | 12.1 |
Stock-based compensation for accelerated Allkem awards | | | — | | | 0.8 |
Record increase in lease expense on Allkem’s leases due to purchase accounting adjustment | | | 0.5 | | | 1.0 |
Net pro forma transaction accounting adjustment to cost of sales | | | $22.9 | | | $125.3 |
(i) | Costs for the year ended December 31, 2022 reflect the step-up in inventory classified as current on the unaudited condensed combined balance sheet. Costs for the six months ended June 30, 2023 reflect the portion of the step-up in inventory classified as non-current and included in other assets on the unaudited condensed combined balance sheet expected to be sold in the six months ended June 30, 2023. |
(ii) | Reflects the revised depreciation of property, plant and equipment assets arising on the acquisition of Allkem and is based on management’s preliminary estimate of useful lives and future production. Livent has historically depreciated all asset classes of property, plant and equipment on a straight-line basis. Allkem has historically depreciated their mining extraction equipment and mine properties using units of production (“UOP”) and uses a straight-line basis for all other asset classes. The mining extraction equipment and mine properties would be classified as separate asset classes for the combined entity and will continue to be depreciated using UOP on a go-forward basis. All other asset classes will use the straight-line depreciation method. |
(in millions) | | | 2024 | | | 2025 | | | 2026 | | | 2027 | | | 2028 |
Depreciation of mining equipment and mine properties purchase adjustment | | | 12.3 | | | 31.3 | | | 36.5 | | | 39.1 | | | 46.7 |
(b) | Reflects the adjustments to selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) including the preliminary incremental stock-based compensation expense for accelerated Allkem Performance Rights and Livent awards, the estimated Livent transaction costs expensed and the increase in lease expense on Allkem’s leases. |
(in millions) | | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 | | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Pro forma transaction accounting adjustments: | | | | | ||
Stock-based compensation for accelerated Allkem awards | | | $— | | | $2.3 |
Stock-based compensation for accelerated Livent awards | | | — | | | 4.9 |
Record increase in lease expense on Allkem’s leases due to purchase accounting adjustment | | | 0.1 | | | 0.2 |
Net pro forma transaction accounting adjustment to SG&A | | | $0.1 | | | $7.4 |
(c) | Represents $85.4 million of transaction-related costs for the year ended December 31, 2022 that are not currently reflected in the historical consolidated financial statements of Livent or Allkem. Livent recognized transaction related costs of $2.9 million and $18.8 million in the Pro Forma Annual Period and Pro Forma Interim Period, respectively. Allkem recognized transaction related costs of $9.9 million in the Pro Forma Interim Period. It is assumed that these costs will not affect the condensed combined statements of operations beyond twelve months after the closing date of the transaction. |
(d) | To record the income tax impact of the pro forma adjustments based on the statutory tax rates of the jurisdictions in which the related pro forma adjustment is recorded. The effective tax rate of the combined company could be significantly different (either higher or lower) depending on post-transaction activities, including cash needs, the geographical mix of income and changes in tax law. Because the tax rates used for the pro forma financial information are estimated, the blended rate will likely vary from the actual effective rate in periods subsequent to completion of the transaction. This determination is preliminary and subject to change based upon the final determination of the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities. |
(e) | Represents the pro forma economic interest the noncontrolling shareholders hold in Allkem’s subsidiaries. The amount is determined by multiplying the applicable pro forma adjustments relevant to those subsidiaries by the noncontrolling interest. |
(f) | The pro forma basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding are a combination of historic weighted average shares of Livent Shares, the incremental NewCo Shares issued to Livent stockholders based on the Merger Exchange Ratio, issuance of CDIs and NewCo Shares to Allkem shareholders based on the Scheme Exchange Ratio, and issuances of shares in connection with the vesting of previously existing equity-based awards. In connection with the transaction, certain Allkem Performance Rights held by Allkem employees will be converted into NewCo equity awards. At this time, management has completed a preliminary analysis related to eligible employees and vesting schedules to determine the impact to the diluted weighted average shares from the converted Allkem Performance Rights. The pro forma basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding are as follows: |
(i) | Weighted average number of Livent Shares issued and outstanding, excluding treasury shares, as of June 30, 2023, which will be exchanged for NewCo Shares. |
(ii) | Weighted average number of Livent Shares issued and outstanding, excluding treasury shares, as of June 30, 2023, including Livent RSUs and Livent PSUs for which vesting will be accelerated pursuant to the transaction and will be exchanged for NewCo Shares. |
(iii) | Estimated number of dilutive Livent Shares (reflecting the impact of certain of Livent’s outstanding share-based awards and the Livent Convertible Notes) based on the weighted average share calculation for the six months ended June 30, 2023. |
(iv) | Number of Allkem Shares issued and outstanding, excluding treasury shares, as of June 30, 2023, including Allkem vested Allkem Performance Rights and unvested Allkem Performance Rights for which vesting will be accelerated pursuant to the transaction and will be exchanged for NewCo Shares. |
(v) | Estimated number of dilutive Allkem Performance Rights that were not accelerated pursuant to the transaction and were replaced with NewCo equity-based awards with similar terms and conditions as the original Allkem Performance Rights. |
(vi) | Basic and diluted shares outstanding, excluding treasury shares, for the six months ended June 30, 2023 were also utilized for the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2022 of the combined company. |
| | Livent Shares (U.S.$) | | | Allkem Shares (A$) | |||||||
| | High | | | Low | | | High | | | Low | |
For the calendar period ended: | | | | | | | | | ||||
2023 | | | | | | | | | ||||
July 1 through September 22 | | | 28.87 | | | 17.34 | | | 16.73 | | | 11.64 |
April 1 through June 30 | | | 27.56 | | | 19.90 | | | 16.32 | | | 10.83 |
January 1 through March 31 | | | 27.39 | | | 18.97 | | | 14.03 | | | 9.99 |
2022 | | | 35.05 | | | 19.52 | | | 16.26 | | | 8.65 |
Fourth Quarter | | | 33.62 | | | 19.52 | | | 16.26 | | | 11.09 |
Third Quarter | | | 35.05 | | | 20.10 | | | 15.99 | | | 9.52 |
Second Quarter | | | 34.49 | | | 20.66 | | | 14.10 | | | 9.64 |
First Quarter | | | 26.43 | | | 19.86 | | | 11.66 | | | 8.65 |
2021 | | | 32.43 | | | 15.75 | | | 10.48 | | | 4.15 |
Fourth Quarter | | | 32.43 | | | 22.18 | | | 10.48 | | | 7.97 |
Third Quarter | | | 25.84 | | | 17.21 | | | 9.96 | | | 6.44 |
Second Quarter | | | 21.17 | | | 16.40 | | | 7.20 | | | 4.93 |
First Quarter | | | 23.41 | | | 15.75 | | | 5.85 | | | 4.15 |
2020 | | | 19.20 | | | 4.19 | | | 4.55 | | | 1.84 |
Fourth Quarter | | | 19.20 | | | 9.03 | | | 4.55 | | | 2.45 |
Third Quarter | | | 9.36 | | | 5.93 | | | 3.28 | | | 2.38 |
Second Quarter | | | 8.74 | | | 4.60 | | | 2.80 | | | 1.84 |
First Quarter | | | 11.86 | | | 4.19 | | | 3.79 | | | 2.03 |
2019 | | | 14.56 | | | 5.64 | | | 3.84 | | | 2.26 |
| | Livent Share (U.S.$) | | | Allkem Share (A$)(1) | |
May 9, 2023 | | | 24.23 | | | 12.83 |
September 22, 2023 | | | 17.70 | | | 12.01 |
(1) | The USD value of one Allkem Share was approximately U.S.$8.68 and U.S.$.$7.75 on May 9, 2023 and September 22, 2023, respectively, based on the AUD to USD closing exchange rate of A$1.4789 per U.S.$1.00 on May 9, 2023 and A$1.5525 per U.S.$1.00 on September 22, 2023. |
| | Period End | | | Average(1) | | | Low | | | High | |
| | (A$ per U.S.$1.00) | ||||||||||
For the calendar period ended: | | | | | | | | | ||||
2023 | | | | | | | | | ||||
July 1 through September 22 | | | 1.5525 | | | 1.5260 | | | 1.4516 | | | 1.5684 |
April 1 through June 30 | | | 1.5006 | | | 1.4968 | | | 1.4525 | | | 1.5378 |
January 1 through March 31 | | | 1.4958 | | | 1.4636 | | | 1.4012 | | | 1.5199 |
2022 | | | 1.4678 | | | 1.4424 | | | 1.3197 | | | 1.6130 |
Fourth Quarter | | | 1.4678 | | | 1.5219 | | | 1.4569 | | | 1.6130 |
Third Quarter | | | 1.5624 | | | 1.4646 | | | 1.4042 | | | 1.5624 |
Second Quarter | | | 1.4483 | | | 1.4011 | | | 1.3197 | | | 1.4588 |
First Quarter | | | 1.3362 | | | 1.3806 | | | 1.3307 | | | 1.4305 |
2021 | | | 1.3769 | | | 1.3323 | | | 1.2550 | | | 1.4290 |
Fourth Quarter | | | 1.3769 | | | 1.3728 | | | 1.3256 | | | 1.4290 |
Third Quarter | | | 1.3837 | | | 1.3613 | | | 1.3281 | | | 1.4013 |
Second Quarter | | | 1.3335 | | | 1.2989 | | | 1.2749 | | | 1.3371 |
First Quarter | | | 1.3166 | | | 1.2943 | | | 1.2550 | | | 1.3193 |
2020 | | | 1.2999 | | | 1.4525 | | | 1.2999 | | | 1.7408 |
Fourth Quarter | | | 1.2999 | | | 1.3673 | | | 1.2999 | | | 1.4229 |
Third Quarter | | | 1.3962 | | | 1.3987 | | | 1.3558 | | | 1.4460 |
Second Quarter | | | 1.4486 | | | 1.5226 | | | 1.4243 | | | 1.6672 |
First Quarter | | | 1.6292 | | | 1.5235 | | | 1.4250 | | | 1.7408 |
2019 | | | 1.4252 | | | 1.4388 | | | 1.3745 | | | 1.4917 |
(1) | The average rate for a period is the arithmetic average of the Bloomberg Generic Composite Rates observed daily during the business days of that period. |
• | Global footprint and presence in three major lithium extraction geographies, including the South American “Lithium Triangle,” Western Australia and Canada; |
• | Diverse set of products exposure, including lithium hydroxide, carbonate, spodumene and specialties; |
• | Complementary business models across chemical processing, hard rock and brine; |
• | Potential for material and highly realizable synergies; and |
• | Enhanced NewCo business strategy, featuring: |
○ | Enhanced business-critical scale and greater capacity to meet growing customer demand; |
○ | Highly complementary and vertically integrated business model; |
○ | Greater capacity and execution expertise to accelerate growth; and |
○ | Commitment to ESG values. |
• | Pro forma revenue of $1,935.3 million and $1,139.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively; |
• | Pro forma net income from continuing operations of $642.8 million and pro forma Adjusted EBITDA of $1,134.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and Pro forma net income from continuing operations of $491.3 million and pro forma Adjusted EBITDA of $742.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 (see “—Explanation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures” below for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to pro forma net income); |
• | Pro forma cash and cash equivalents of $983.1 million as of June 30, 2023; and |
• | Fourteen key assets and approximately 2,600 employees globally across seven countries. |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2023 | | | Year ended December 31, 2022 | |
Pro Forma Net Income From Continuing Operations | | | $491.3 | | | $642.8 |
Add back: | | | | | ||
Income tax expense | | | 180.5 | | | 232.9 |
Interest income, net | | | (43.6) | | | (16.2) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 98.2 | | | 98.1 |
Pro Forma EBITDA | | | 726.4 | | | 957.6 |
Add back: | | | | | ||
Inventory adjustment due to purchase price allocation(a) | | | 1.2 | | | 111.4 |
Argentina remeasurement losses(b) | | | 22.8 | | | 21.2 |
Restructuring and other charges(c) | | | 36.0 | | | 92.9 |
Accelerated share-based compensation(d) | | | — | | | 8.0 |
COVID-19 related costs(e) | | | — | | | 2.4 |
Other loss related to equity method investments(f) | | | 5.3 | | | 11.3 |
Other non-recurring items(g) | | | — | | | 1.0 |
Subtract: | | | | | ||
Blue Chip Swap gain(h) | | | (49.5) | | | (69.4) |
Argentina interest income(i) | | | — | | | (1.5) |
Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA | | | $742.2 | | | $1,134.9 |
(a) | Relates to the step-up in inventory classified as current on the unaudited condensed combined balance sheet quantified as part of purchase accounting as it is considered a one-time, non-recurring cost. |
(b) | Represents impact of currency fluctuations on tax assets and liabilities and on long-term monetary assets associated with Livent and Allkem's capital expansion as well as significant currency devaluations. |
(c) | Restructuring and other charges consist primarily of transaction costs incurred by Livent and Allkem to facilitate the transaction. Livent also continually performs strategic reviews and assesses the return on its business. This sometimes results in management changes or in a plan to restructure the operations of the business. As part of these restructuring plans, demolition costs and write-downs of long-lived assets may occur. Restructuring and other charges also include miscellaneous nonrecurring costs, exit costs, severance-related costs and environmental remediation costs incurred by Livent. |
(d) | Represents incremental and non-recurring share-based compensation cost as a direct result of acceleration of certain Livent and Allkem equity-based awards in connection with the transaction. |
(e) | Represents incremental costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic recorded in “Cost of sales” in Livent’s consolidated statement of operations, including but not limited to, incremental quarantine related absenteeism, incremental facility cleaning costs, COVID-19 testing, pandemic related supplies and personal protective equipment for employees, among other costs; offset by economic relief provided by foreign governments. No material impact of COVID-19 in the year ended December 31, 2022 was recorded in Allkem’s consolidated statement of profit and loss. |
(f) | Represents Livent’s 50% share (which was 25% prior to June 6, 2022) in costs incurred for certain project-related costs to align its investee’s (Nemaska Lithium) reported results with Livent’s capitalization policies, interest expense incurred by NLI and, for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022, non-recurring transaction costs related to its initial investment in NLI totaling $9.9 million, all included in Equity in net loss of unconsolidated affiliates in its consolidated statement of operations. In addition, includes Allkem’s share of loss on the 75% economic interest in TLC and is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA because TLC is constructing a plant that is still in either the development or commissioning phase, all included in Share of loss of associate, net of tax in its consolidated statement of profit and loss. |
(g) | Represents Livent’s legal and professional fees and other separation-related activities totaling $0.7 million and $0.1 million partial write-off of deferred financing costs for the amendments to Livent’s Revolving Credit Facility incurred in the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 and excluded from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA because the loss is nonrecurring. Also includes Allkem impairment and write-downs amounts totaling $0.2 million for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022, which are also considered non-recurring in nature. |
(h) | Represents Livent and Allkem’s non-recurring gains of $11.4 million and $38.1 million, respectively for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and non-recurring gains of $22.2 million and $47.2 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2022 from the sale in Argentine pesos of Argentine Sovereign U.S. dollar-denominated bonds due to the significant divergence of Argentina’s Blue Chip Swap market exchange rate from the official rate. |
(i) | Represents interest income received from the Argentina government for the period beginning when the recoverability of certain expansion-related VAT receivables were approved by the Argentina government and ending on the date when the reimbursements were paid by the Argentina government but is excluded from our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA because of its association with long-term capital projects which will not be operational until future periods. |
(1) | Excludes tantalum sales, which were minimal in the year ended December 31, 2022. |
(2) | Lithium specialties includes butyllithium (BuLi), high purity lithium metal, lithium phosphate, pharmaceutical-grade lithium carbonate, high purity lithium chloride, and specialty organics. |
(3) | Includes minimal lithium chloride (LiCl) sales in 2022. |
(4) | Remaining ownership split between TTC (25.0%) and Jujuy Energía y Minería Sociedad del Estado (JEMSE) (8.5%). |
(5) | Remaining 25.0% economic interest owned by TTC. |
(6) | Remaining 50.0% economic interest owned by Investissement Québec. |
(7) | Operated under exclusive and strict manufacturing contracts. |
(1) | Includes minimal lithium chloride sales in calendar year 2022. |
• | Mt Cattlin lithium spodumene mine in Ravensthorpe, Western Australia; |
• | Olaroz lithium facility in Jujuy Province, Argentina (of which Allkem owns a 66.5% equity interest); |
• | Cauchari lithium brine project in Jujuy Province, Argentina; |
• | Sal de Vida lithium brine project in Catamarca Province, Argentina; |
• | James Bay lithium spodumene project in Québec, Canada; and |
• | Naraha lithium hydroxide plant in Naraha, Japan (of which Allkem owns a 75% economic interest). |
• | Growth. Allkem focuses on its ability to integrate vertically and sustainably scale production. |
• | Sustainability. Allkem focuses on a net zero emissions target, human rights and local communities and safety, quality and productivity. |
• | Customer Focus. Allkem focuses on expanding a diversified customer base, while also maintaining and growing existing relationships. |
• | Product Quality. Allkem focuses on optimizing product quality and product reliability. |
• | Cost Leadership. Allkem focuses on leveraging management expertise across operations and improving bargaining power with suppliers. |
(1) | Table does not include non-lithium production amounts, including borates (which business was divested by Allkem in the sale of its former Borax segment in December 2022, as discussed further in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Allkem” beginning on page 238 of this proxy statement/prospectus) and tantalum (which production is immaterial to Allkem). |
(2) | Through the Olaroz joint venture, as described in the “Properties Overview” section below, Allkem owns a 66.5% interest in Olaroz and, therefore, the table above reflects 66.5% of the Olaroz production capacity and production. |
(3) | Olaroz Stage 1 has capacity of 17,500 metric tons of lithium carbonate. Olaroz Stage 2 has capacity of 25,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate and achieved first production in July 2023, subsequent to fiscal year end. The combined capacity of Olaroz Stage 1 and Stage 2, subsequent to fiscal year end, is 42,500 metric tons of lithium carbonate. |
(4) | Allkem acquired Mt Cattlin as part of the Galaxy/Orocobre Merger on August 25, 2021. Production capacity and production shown for Mt Cattlin are for entire periods, including pre-acquisition periods. |
(5) | Naraha is a downstream production facility that further refines lithium carbonate to lithium hydroxide with a production capacity of 10,000 metric tons of lithium hydroxide. |
(6) | Through the Naraha joint venture, as described in the “Properties Overview” section below, Allkem owns a 75% economic interest in Naraha and, therefore, is reporting 75% of the Naraha production capacity and production. |
(7) | Mt Cattlin production capacity is stated on the basis of metric tons of ore feeding the process facility. |
(8) | Lithium carbonate production amounts shown as lithium carbonate. Conversion to lithium metal is 0.1878 metric tons of lithium metal to 1 metric ton of lithium carbon. |
(9) | Spodumene concentrate production amounts shown as metric tons of spodumene at an average Li2O% grade of approximately 5.6%. Conversion to lithium metal is 0.02552 metric tons of lithium metal to 1 metric ton of spodumene concentrate at 5.5% Li2O. Conversion to lithium metal is 0.02784 metric tons of lithium metal to 1 metric ton of spodumene concentrate at 6.0% Li2O. |
• | Water and Brine. Brine is extracted from wells in the salt lake (salar) and pumped to large scale evaporation ponds. The processing of brines consumes industrial water, which is extracted and treated to be used in processing and is then returned to the evaporation ponds after processing to recover residual lithium. |
• | Energy. Energy is generated by natural gas generators to power processes in the production plant and provide electricity. Diesel is used on site for machinery and the transport fleet. Allkem’s greatest source of energy is supplied by solar radiation which is used for concentrating brine in the evaporation ponds. |
• | Reagents. Lime, soda ash, and other reagents and CO2 are incorporated in the process to remove impurities and crystallize and purify lithium carbonate product. In terms of volume, lime and soda ash are the highest consumables. Lime is procured locally from various suppliers with a mixture of medium-term contracts with prices tied to key consumables and long-standing relationships. Soda ash is imported from different international suppliers with a mix of medium- or long-term contractual relationships. |
• | Water. Groundwater is sourced from a bore field, a decant return line from in pit tailings storage facility and rainwater tanks. Raw water is sourced from water bores and piped to either the raw water dam to be used in the processing plant or for use in dust suppression in mining operations. Rainwater is also captured and primarily used for drill rigs. |
• | Energy. Diesel is used for electricity generation and for the transport fleet, plant and machinery. Energy is used to treat water in a reverse osmosis plant for human consumption. |
• | Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (WA) and Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2021 (WA) regulated by the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage, and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Cth) regulated by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water; |
• | Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) and Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (WA) regulated by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, and the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) regulated by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water; |
• | Mining Act 1978 (WA) and Mining Regulations 1981 (WA), regulated by the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety; |
• | Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), regulated by the Attorney-General’s Department and the National Native Title Tribunal; and |
• | Work Health and Safety Act 2020 (WA), Work Health and Safety (General) Regulations 2022 (WA), and Work Health and Safety (Mines) Regulations 2022 regulated by Worksafe WA and the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety. |
• | Category I lands are reserved for the exclusive use of the Cree. They may be used for residential, community, commercial, industrial or other purposes. In addition, the Cree have an exclusive right to hunting, fishing and trapping; |
• | Category II lands are contiguous to Category I lands. They are part of the public domain of Québec. These are lands where the Cree have exclusive rights of hunting, fishing and trapping; and |
• | Category III lands represent all lands in the JBNQA territory not included in Category I and Category II lands. General access to Category III lands is in accordance with provincial legislation and regulations concerning public lands. Exclusive rights or privileges are not granted to the Cree regarding Category III, but the Cree are nevertheless granted non-exclusive rights to pursue their harvesting activities (hunting, fishing and trapping) year-round. |
Peter Coleman | | | Independent Non-Executive Chairman |
Martín Pérez de Solay | | | Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer |
Fernando Oris de Roa | | | Independent Non-Executive Director |
Leanne Heywood | | | Independent Non-Executive Director |
Alan Fitzpatrick | | | Independent Non-Executive Director |
John Turner | | | Independent Non-Executive Director |
Florencia Heredia | | | Independent Non-Executive Director |
Richard Seville | | | Non-Executive Director |
• | Respect. Allkem fosters trusted relationships with its collaborators, the different communities in which it operates and its business partners. |
• | Inclusion. Allkem promotes a working environment where everyone is treated with respect and differences are considered and celebrated. |
• | Empowerment. Allkem encourages all of its collaborators to live to their fullest potential and to be proud of the role they play. |
• | Commitment. Allkem keeps its promises, reinforcing its reputation as a trustworthy and qualified partner. |
• | Integrity. Allkem is consistent with its core values in all of its tasks and in its interactions with others. |
• | Safe and Sustainable Operations. To aim to maintain the highest levels of safety, efficiency and resilience, Allkem sets clear safety, environment and social objectives and fosters a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement to drive efficiency, quality and sustainable development. |
• | Thriving Communities. To aim to cultivate thriving, resilient communities that are autonomous and self-sustaining, Allkem believes in creating shared value and has defined its strategy to manage, monitor and report performance against community-based sustainable development commitments. |
• | Responsible Products. To aim to be the supplier of choice for quality lithium chemicals, Allkem strives to deliver quality products in a sustainable and transparent manner throughout its global value chain that will contribute to the global transition towards a net zero carbon economy. |
Location | | | Function | | | Leased/Owned |
Australia | | | | | ||
Mt Cattlin, Western Australia | | | Production of lithium spodumene minerals and lithium concentrate | | | Owned |
Perth, Western Australia | | | Administrative | | | Leased |
Brisbane, Queensland | | | Administrative | | | Leased |
Location | | | Function | | | Leased/Owned |
Argentina | | | | | ||
Salar de Olaroz, Jujuy | | | Production of lithium carbonate (technical and battery-grade) | | | Owned(1) |
Salar del Hombre Muerto, Catamarca | | | Production of technical and battery-grade lithium carbonate (currently under development) | | | Owned |
Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires | | | Corporate Headquarters | | | Leased |
San Salvador de Jujuy, Jujuy | | | Administrative | | | Leased |
San Fernando del Valle de Catamarca, Catamarca | | | Administrative | | | Leased |
Canada | | | | | ||
James Bay, Québec | | | Production of lithium spodumene minerals and lithium concentrate (currently under development) | | | Owned |
Montreal, Québec | | | Administrative | | | Leased |
Toronto, Ontario | | | Administrative | | | Leased |
Japan | | | | | ||
Naraha, Fukushima | | | Production of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide (currently under development) | | | Owned(2) |
(1) | Olaroz is owned through a joint venture with ownership of 66.5% by Allkem, 25% by TTC and 8.5% by JEMSE. Cauchari is wholly owned by Allkem. |
(2) | Naraha is owned through a joint venture, TLC, with economic ownership of 75% by Allkem and 25% by TTC. |
Location | | | Ownership (%) | | | Extraction Type | | | Stage |
Australia | | | | | | | |||
Mt Cattlin, Western Australia | | | 100% | | | Hard rock | | | Production |
Argentina | | | | | | | |||
Salar de Olaroz, Jujuy (Olaroz) | | | 66.5%(1) | | | Brine | | | Exploration(2) |
Salar del Hombre Muerto, Catamarca (Sal de Vida) | | | 100% | | | Brine | | | Development |
Salar de Cauchari, Jujuy (Cauchari) | | | 100% | | | Brine | | | Development |
Canada | | | | | | | |||
James Bay, Québec | | | 100% | | | Hard rock | | | Development |
(1) | Olaroz is owned through a joint venture with ownership of 66.5% by Allkem, 25% by TTC and 8.5% by JEMSE and, pursuant to Subpart 1300, is reported in this “Properties” section only for the portion of production, mineral resources or mineral reserves attributable to Allkem’s 66.5% interest in the property. |
(2) | Allkem has started extraction at Olaroz without determining mineral reserves. |
| | Aggregate Annual Production (metric tons) Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | |||||||
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
Lithium (Lithium metal)(1) | | | | | | | |||
Australia | | | | | | | |||
Mt Cattlin | | | 3,225 | | | 5,036 | | | 4,670 |
Argentina | | | | | | | |||
Olaroz(2) | | | 2,087 | | | 1,607 | | | 1,575 |
Total lithium metal | | | 5,312 | | | 6,643 | | | 6,245 |
(1) | Lithium production amounts shown as lithium metal. Conversion to LCE is 0.1878 metric tons of lithium metal to 1 metric ton of LCE (i.e., a |
(2) | Lithium metal production from Olaroz represents 66.5% of production of Olaroz, which is attributable to Allkem’s interest in the Olaroz joint venture. |
| | Measured Mineral Resources | | | Indicated Mineral Resources | | | Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources | | | Inferred Mineral Resources | |||||||||||||
| | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (% Li2O) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (% Li2O) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (% Li2O) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (% Li2O) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
Lithium - Hard Rock(1)(3)(13) (Ore) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Australia | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Mt Cattlin(4) | | | 100 | | | 1.00% | | | 3,200 | | | 1.40% | | | 3,300 | | | 1.39% | | | 600 | | | 1.10% |
Canada | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
James Bay(5) | | | — | | | —% | | | 18,100 | | | 1.12% | | | 18,100 | | | 1.12% | | | 55,900 | | | 1.29% |
Total | | | 100 | | | 1.00% | | | 21,300 | | | 1.16% | | | 21,400 | | | 1.16% | | | 56,500 | | | 1.29% |
| | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (ppm) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (ppm) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (ppm) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (ppm) | |
Tantalum - Ta2O5(1)(3)(12) (Ore) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Australia | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Mt Cattlin | | | 100 | | | 179 | | | 3,200 | | | 201 | | | 3,300 | | | 200 | | | 600 | | | 207 |
Total | | | 100 | | | 1793 | | | 200 | | | 201 | | | 3,300 | | | 200 | | | 600 | | | 207 |
| | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Concentration (mg/L) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Concentration (mg/L) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Concentration (mg/L) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Concentration (mg/L) | |
Lithium - Brine(2)(3)(6)(8) (Lithium metal) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Argentina | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Olaroz(7)(9) | | | 1,565 | | | 659 | | | 499 | | | 592 | | | 2,065 | | | 641 | | | 1,105 | | | 609 |
Sal de Vida(10) | | | 578 | | | 745 | | | 180 | | | 730 | | | 758 | | | 742 | | | 122 | | | 556 |
Cauchari(11) | | | 302 | | | 581 | | | 321 | | | 494 | | | 623 | | | 519 | | | 285 | | | 473 |
Total | | | 2,445 | | | 670 | | | 1,000 | | | 585 | | | 3,446 | | | 641 | | | 1,512 | | | 579 |
(1) | Hard rock assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of ore. |
(2) | Brine assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of lithium metal. |
(3) | Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
(4) | For Mt Cattlin, a cut-off grade of 0.3% Li2O was utilized for a spodumene concentrate (6.0% Li2O) price of $1,500 per metric ton and an A$/US$ exchange rate of 1.43 over the entirety of the LOM of 5 to 6 years. The estimate is reported in-situ and exclusive of mineral reserves. |
(5) | For James Bay, a raised cut-off grade of 0.5% Li2O was utilized due to metallurgical considerations. The calculated break-even cut-off grade is 0.17% Li2O. Mineral resources are estimated using a long-term spodumene concentrate (6.0% Li2O) price of $1,500/t and a Canadian dollar (“C$”)/US$ exchange rate of 1.33 over the entirety of the LOM of 19 years. The estimate is reported in-situ and exclusive of mineral reserves. |
(6) | Lithium metal is converted to lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) with a conversion factor of 5.323 (i.e., 5.323 metric tons of LCE per 1 metric ton lithium metal). |
(7) | Through the Olaroz joint venture, Allkem owns a 66.5% interest in Olaroz and, therefore, is reporting 66.5% of the mineral resources that are subject to the Olaroz joint venture. In addition to Allkem’s stake in the Olaroz joint venture, Allkem also owns 100% of six properties immediately in the north of Olaroz, which properties’ mineral resources are reported on a 100% basis. |
(8) | For lithium brine, the estimate is reported in-situ and exclusive of mineral reserves, where the lithium mass is representative of what remains in the reservoir after the LOM. To calculate mineral resources exclusive of mineral reserves, a direct correlation was assumed between proven reserves and measured resources, as well as probable reserves and indicated resources. Proven mineral reserves (from the point of reference of brine pumped to the evaporation ponds) were subtracted from measured mineral resources, and probable mineral reserves (from the point of reference of brine pumped to the evaporation ponds) were subtracted from indicated mineral resources. The average grade for measured and indicated resources exclusive of mineral reserves was calculated based on the remaining brine volume and lithium mass. |
(9) | For Olaroz, a lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was utilized based on a breakeven cut-off grade for a price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the LOM of 32 years. The average lithium grade of the measured and indicated mineral resources corresponds to 609 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average mineral resources concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
(10) | For Sal de Vida, a lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was utilized based on a price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the LOM of 40 years. The average lithium grade of the measured and indicated mineral resources corresponds to 742 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average measured and indicated mineral resources concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
(11) | For Cauchari, a lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was utilized based on a price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the LOM of 30 years. The average lithium grade of the measured and indicated mineral resources corresponds to 519 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average measured and indicated mineral resources concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
(12) | Tonnage of lithium hard rock ore resources reported for Mt Cattlin above include the concentration of tantalum in parts per million (ppm) reported in this row. |
(13) | LCE is converted to Li2O with a conversion factor of 2.473 (i.e., 2.473 metric tons of LCE per 1 metric ton of Li2O). Li2O is converted to lithium metal with a conversion factor of 0.464 (i.e., 0.464 metric ton of lithium metal per 1 metric ton of Li2O). |
| | Proven Mineral Reserves | | | Probable Mineral Reserves | | | Total Mineral Reserves | ||||||||||
| | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (% Li2O) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (% Li2O) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (% Li2O) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||
Lithium - Hard Rock (Ore)(1)(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Australia | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Mt Cattlin(3) | | | 200 | | | 0.90% | | | 7,000 | | | 1.17% | | | 7,100 | | | 1.18% |
Canada | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
James Bay(4) | | | — | | | —% | | | 37,296 | | | 1.27% | | | 37,296 | | | 1.27% |
Total | | | 200 | | | 0.90% | | | 44,296 | | | 1.25% | | | 44,396 | | | 1.26% |
| | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (ppm) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (ppm) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (ppm) | |
Tantalum - Ta2O5 (Ore)(1)(8) | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Australia | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Mt Cattlin | | | 200 | | | 120 | | | 7,000 | | | 121 | | | 7,100 | | | 120 |
Total | | | 200 | | | 120 | | | 7,000 | | | 121 | | | 7,100 | | | 120 |
| | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (mg/L) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (mg/L) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (mg/L) | |
Lithium - Brine (Lithium metal)(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Argentina | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Olaroz(5) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Sal de Vida(6) | | | 84 | | | 799 | | | 383 | | | 748 | | | 467 | | | 757 |
Cauchari(7) | | | 43 | | | 571 | | | 169 | | | 485 | | | 212 | | | 501 |
Total | | | 127 | | | 722 | | | 552 | | | 667 | | | 679 | | | 677 |
(1) | Hard rock assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of ore. |
(2) | Brine assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of lithium metal. |
(3) | For Mt Cattlin, a cut-off grade of 0.3% Li2O was utilized for a spodumene concentrate (6.0% Li2O) price of $1,500 per metric ton and an A$/US$ exchange rate of 1.43 over the entirety of the LOM of 5 to 6 years. Mineral reserves are calculated in-situ. |
(4) | For James Bay, mineral reserves are reported using a cut-off grade of 0.62% Li2O and include 8.7% dilution at an average grade of 0.42% Li2O. The average LOM strip ratio is 3.56:1. Mineral reserves are estimated using a long-term spodumene concentrate (6.0% Li2O) price of $1,500/t and a C$/US$ exchange rate of 1.33 over the entirety of the LOM of 19 years. Bulk density of ore is variable, outlined in the geological block model, and averages 2.7 g/t. Mineral reserves are calculated in-situ. |
(5) | No mineral reserves have been determined at Olaroz, and Allkem has started extraction at Olaroz without determining mineral reserves. |
(6) | For Sal de Vida, a lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was utilized based on a breakeven cut-off grade for a projected price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the LOM of 40 years. The average lithium grade of the proven and probable reserves corresponds to 757 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average proven and probable reserve concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
(7) | For Cauchari, a lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was utilized based on a breakeven cut-off grade for a projected price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the LOM of 30 years. The average lithium grade of the proven and probable reserves corresponds to 501 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average proven and probable reserves concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
(8) | Tonnage of lithium hard rock ore reserves reported for Mt Cattlin above include the concentration of tantalum in ppm reported in this row. To date, Allkem’s tantalum production has been immaterial and a byproduct of lithium mining. |
Lithium – Hard Rock | | | Amount | | | Grade | | | Grade |
(Ore) | | | (‘000s metric tons) | | | (% Li2O) | | | (Ta2O5 ppm) |
Measured Mineral Resources | | | 100 | | | 1.00% | | | 179 |
Indicated Mineral Resources | | | 3,200 | | | 1.40% | | | 201 |
Total Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources | | | 3,300 | | | 1.39% | | | 200 |
Inferred Mineral Resources | | | 600 | | | 1.10% | | | 207 |
Total Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources | | | 3,900 | | | 1.34% | | | 201 |
• | Hard rock assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of ore. |
• | Comparison of values may not add up due to rounding or the use of averaging methods. |
• | Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
• | Mineral resources have been reported as in-situ. |
• | Mineral resources are reported considering a set of assumptions for reporting purposes: |
○ | A cut-off grade of 0.3% Li2O was utilized for a spodumene concentrate (6.0% Li2O) price of $1,500 per metric ton, tantalum concentrate price of $20 per pound and an A$/US$ exchange rate of 1.43 over the entirety of the LOM of 5 to 6 years. |
○ | Processing costs of US$13.19/t of ore. |
○ | Mining costs of US$3.00/t of ore. |
○ | Transport costs of US$34.74/t of spodumene concentrate. |
○ | State royalty of 5%. |
○ | Li2O% metallurgical recovery of 75%. |
○ | Ta2O5 ppm metallurgical recovery of 25%. |
○ | Inherent mining dilution and recovery of 17% and 93%, respectively. |
Lithium – Hard Rock | | | Amount | | | Grade | | | Grade |
(Ore) | | | (‘000s metric tons) | | | (% Li2O) | | | (Ta2O5 ppm) |
Proven Mineral Resources (In-situ) | | | 200 | | | 0.90% | | | 120 |
Probable Mineral Reserves (In-situ) | | | 5,200 | | | 1.3% | | | 130 |
Probable Mineral Reserves (Stockpile) | | | 1,800 | | | 0.8% | | | 95 |
Total Mineral Reserves | | | 7,100 | | | 1.16% | | | 121 |
• | Hard rock assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of ore. |
• | Comparison of values may not add up due to rounding or the use of averaging methods. |
• | Mineral reserves are calculated in-situ. |
• | Mineral reserves are reported considering the following theoretical cut-off parameters: |
○ | A cut-off grade of 0.3% Li2O was utilized for a spodumene concentrate (6.0% Li2O) price of $1,500 per metric ton, tantalum concentrate price of $20 per pound and an A$/US$ exchange rate of 1.43 over the entirety of the LOM of 5 to 6 years. |
○ | Processing costs of US$13.19/t of ore. |
○ | Mining costs of US$3.00/t of ore. |
○ | Transport costs of US$34.74/t of spodumene concentrate. |
○ | State royalty of 5%. |
○ | Metallurgical recovery of 70.1%. |
○ | Li2O% metallurgical recovery of 66.5%. |
○ | Ta2O5 ppm metallurgical recovery of 20%. |
○ | Inherent mining dilution and recovery of 17% and 93%, respectively. |
Lithium – Brine | | | Attributable Amount | | | Concentration |
(Lithium metal) | | | (‘000s metric tons) | | | (mg/L) |
Measured Mineral Resources | | | 1,565 | | | 659 |
Indicated Mineral Resources | | | 499 | | | 592 |
Total Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources | | | 2,065 | | | 641 |
Inferred Mineral Resources | | | 1,105 | | | 609 |
Total Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources | | | 3,170 | | | 631 |
• | Brine assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of lithium metal. |
• | Comparison of values may not add up due to rounding or the use of averaging methods. |
• | Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
• | Lithium metal is converted to lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) with a conversion factor of 5.323 (i.e., 5.323 metric tons of LCE per 1 metric ton of lithium metal). |
• | Through the Olaroz joint venture, Allkem owns a 66.5% interest in Olaroz and, therefore, is reporting 66.5% of the mineral resources that are subject to the Olaroz joint venture. In addition to Allkem’s stake in the Olaroz joint venture, Allkem also owns 100% of six properties immediately in the north of Olaroz, which properties’ mineral resources are reported on a 100% basis. |
• | The estimate is reported in-situ and exclusive of mineral reserves, where the lithium mass is representative of what remains in the reservoir after the LOM. To calculate mineral resources exclusive of mineral reserves, a direct correlation was assumed between proven reserves and measured resources, as well as probable reserves and indicated resources. Proven mineral reserves (from the point of reference of brine pumped to the evaporation ponds) were subtracted from measured mineral resources, and probable mineral reserves (from the point of reference of brine pumped to the evaporation ponds) were subtracted from indicated mineral resources. The average grade for measured and indicated resources exclusive of mineral reserves was calculated based on the remaining brine volume and lithium mass. |
• | A lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was utilized based on a breakeven cut-off grade for a projected price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the LOM of 32 years. The average lithium grade of the measured and indicated mineral resources corresponds to 609 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average mineral resources concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
• | The estimated economic cut-off grade utilized for resource reporting purposes is 300 mg/l lithium, based on the following assumptions: |
○ | A technical grade LCE price of $20,000/metric ton. |
○ | Recovery factor for the salar operation over the span of LOM is 62%. |
○ | An average annual brine pumping rate of 600 L/s is assumed. |
○ | Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, G&A and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate. Average LOM operating cost is calculated at approximately $4,149/metric ton LCE. |
Lithium - Brine (Lithium metal) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Concentration (mg/L) |
Measured Mineral Resources | | | 578 | | | 745 |
Indicated Mineral Resources | | | 180 | | | 730 |
Total Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources | | | 758 | | | 742 |
Inferred Mineral Resources | | | 122 | | | 556 |
Total Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources | | | 880 | | | 716 |
• | Brine assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of lithium metal. |
• | Comparison of values may not add up due to rounding or the use of averaging methods. |
• | Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
• | Lithium metal is converted to lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) with a conversion factor of 5.323 (i.e., 5.323 metric tons of LCE per 1 metric ton of lithium metal). |
• | The estimate is reported in-situ and exclusive of mineral reserves, where the lithium mass is representative of what remains in the reservoir after the LOM. To calculate mineral resources exclusive of mineral reserves, a direct correlation was assumed between proven reserves and measured resources, as well as probable reserves and indicated resources. Proven mineral reserves (from the point of reference of brine pumped to the evaporation ponds) were subtracted from measured mineral resources, and probable mineral reserves (from the point of reference of brine pumped to the evaporation ponds) were subtracted from indicated mineral resources. The average grade for measured and indicated resources exclusive of mineral reserves was calculated based on the remaining brine volume and lithium mass. |
• | A lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was utilized based on a breakeven cut-off grade for a projected price of $20,000 per metric LCE ton over the entirety of the LOM of 40 years. The average lithium grade of the measured and indicated resources corresponds to 742 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average measured and indicated resources concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
• | The estimated economic cut-off grade utilized for resource reporting purposes is 300 mg/l lithium, based on the following assumptions: |
○ | A technical grade LCE price of $20,000/metric ton. |
○ | Recovery factor for the salar operation over the span of LOM is 70%. |
○ | An average annual brine pumping rate of 506 L/s is assumed. |
○ | Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, G&A and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate. Average LOM operating cost is calculated at approximately $4,003/metric ton LCE. |
Lithium - Brine (Lithium metal) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Concentration (mg/L) |
Proven Mineral Reserves | | | 84 | | | 799 |
Probable Mineral Reserves | | | 383 | | | 748 |
Total Mineral Reserves | | | 467 | | | 757 |
• | Brine assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of lithium metal. |
• | Comparison of values may not add up due to rounding or the use of averaging methods. |
• | Lithium metal is converted to lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) with a conversion factor of 5.323 (i.e., 5.323 metric tons of LCE per 1 metric ton of lithium metal). |
• | A lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was utilized based on a breakeven cut-off grade for a projected price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the LOM of 40 years. The average lithium grade of the proven and probable reserves corresponds to 757 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average Proven and Probable reserve concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
• | The estimated economic cut-off grade utilized for reserve reporting purposes is 300 mg/l lithium, based on the following assumptions: |
○ | A technical grade LCE price of $20,000/metric ton. |
○ | Recovery factor for the salar operation over the span of LOM is 70%. |
○ | An average annual brine pumping rate of 506 L/s is assumed. |
○ | Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, G&A and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate. Average LOM operating cost is calculated at approximately $4,003/metric ton LCE. |
Lithium - Brine (Lithium metal) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Concentration (mg/L) |
Measured Mineral Resources | | | 302 | | | 581 |
Indicated Mineral Resources | | | 321 | | | 494 |
Total Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources | | | 623 | | | 519 |
Inferred Mineral Resources | | | 285 | | | 473 |
Total Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources | | | 908 | | | 516 |
• | Brine assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of lithium metal. |
• | Comparison of values may not add up due to rounding or the use of averaging methods. |
• | Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
• | Lithium metal is converted to lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) with a conversion factor of 5.323 (i.e., 5.323 metric tons of LCE per 1 metric ton of lithium metal). |
• | The estimate is reported in-situ and exclusive of mineral reserves, where the lithium mass is representative of what remains in the reservoir after the LOM. To calculate mineral resources exclusive of mineral reserves, a direct correlation was assumed between proven reserves and measured resources, as well as probable reserves and indicated resources. Proven mineral reserves (from the point of reference of brine pumped to the evaporation ponds) were subtracted from measured mineral resources, and probable mineral reserves (from the point of reference of brine pumped to the evaporation ponds) were subtracted from indicated mineral resources. The average grade for measured and indicated resources exclusive of mineral reserves was calculated based on the remaining brine volume and lithium mass. |
• | A lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was utilized based on a breakeven cut-off grade for a projected price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the LOM of 30 years. The average lithium grade of the measured and indicated mineral resources corresponds to 519 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average measured and indicated resource concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
• | The estimated economic cut-off grade utilized for resource reporting purposes is 300 mg/l lithium, based on the following assumptions: |
○ | A technical grade LCE price of $20,000/metric ton. |
○ | Recovery factor for the salar operation over the span of LOM is 67%. |
○ | An average annual brine pumping rate of 480 L/s is assumed. |
○ | Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, G&A and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate. Average LOM operating cost is calculated at approximately $4,081/metric ton LCE. |
Lithium - Brine (Lithium metal) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Concentration (mg/L) |
Proven Mineral Reserves | | | 43 | | | 571 |
Probable Mineral Reserves | | | 169 | | | 485 |
Total Mineral Reserves | | | 212 | | | 501 |
• | Brine assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of lithium metal. |
• | Comparison of values may not add up due to rounding or the use of averaging methods. |
• | Lithium metal is converted to lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) with a conversion factor of 5.323 (i.e., 5.323 metric tons of LCE per 1 metric ton of lithium metal).. |
• | A lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was utilized based on a breakeven cut-off grade for a projected price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the LOM of 30 years. The average lithium grade of the proven and probable reserves corresponds to 501 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average proven and probable reserves concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
• | The estimated economic cut-off grade utilized for reserve reporting purposes is 300 mg/l lithium, based on the following assumptions: |
○ | A technical grade LCE price of $20,000/metric ton. |
○ | Recovery factor for the salar operation over the span of LOM is 67%. |
○ | An average annual brine pumping rate of 480 L/s is assumed. |
○ | Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, G&A and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate. Average LOM operating cost is calculated at approximately $4,081/metric ton LCE. |
Lithium - Hard Rock (Ore metric tons) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (% Li2O) |
Measured Mineral Resources | | | — | | | —% |
Indicated Mineral Resources | | | 18,100 | | | 1.12% |
Total Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources | | | 18,100 | | | 1.12% |
Inferred Mineral Resources | | | 55,900 | | | 1.29% |
Total Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources | | | 74,000 | | | 1.25% |
• | Hard rock assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of ore. |
• | Comparison of values may not add up due to rounding or the use of averaging methods. |
• | Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated reasonable prospects for economic extraction. |
• | Mineral resources have been reported as in-situ. |
• | Mineral resources are reported using a raised cut-off grade of 0.5% Li2O due to metallurgical considerations. The calculated break-even cut-off grade is 0.17% Li2O. |
• | Mineral resources are estimated using a long-term spodumene concentrate (6.0% Li2O) price of $1,500/t and a C$/US$ exchange rate of 1.33 over the entirety of the LOM of 19 years. |
• | Mineral resources were constrained using a Whittle pit optimization shell using the following set of assumptions for mineral resource reporting: |
○ | Processing costs of C$13.23/t of ore. |
○ | G&A costs of C$13.86/t of ore. |
○ | Closure, Sustaining CAPEX, and IBA payments of C$6.83/t of ore. |
○ | Mining costs of C$4.82/t of ore. |
○ | Metallurgical recovery of 70.1%. |
○ | Transport costs of $86.16/t of spodumene concentrate. |
○ | NSR royalty of 0.32%. |
○ | Average pit slope angle of 47.5 degrees. |
Lithium - Hard Rock (Ore metric tons) | | | Amount (‘000s metric tons) | | | Grade (% Li2O) |
Proven Mineral Reserves | | | — | | | —% |
Probable Mineral Reserves | | | 37,296 | | | 1.27% |
Total Mineral Reserves | | | 37,296 | | | 1.27% |
• | Hard rock assets are expressed in thousand metric tons of ore. |
• | Comparison of values may not add up due to rounding or the use of averaging methods. |
• | Mineral reserves are reported using a cut-off grade of 0.62% Li2O and include 8.7% dilution at an average grade of 0.42% Li2O. The average LOM strip ratio is 3.56:1. |
• | Mineral reserves are calculated in-situ. |
• | Mineral reserves are estimated using a long-term spodumene concentrate (6.0% Li2O) price of $1,500/t and a C$/US$ exchange rate of 1.33 over the entirety of the LOM of 19 years. |
• | Bulk density of ore is variable, outlined in the geological block model, and averages 2.7 g/t. |
• | Mineral reserves were constrained within the pit design using the following set of assumptions: |
○ | Processing costs of C$18.13/t of ore. |
○ | G&A, Royalties, IBA, Owner’s cost, Closure, and Sustaining costs of C$38.17/t of ore. |
○ | Mining costs of C$5.70/t of ore. |
○ | Metallurgical recovery of 68.9%. |
○ | Transport and Insurance costs of $105.8/t of spodumene concentrate. |
○ | Average pit slope angle of 47.5 degrees. |
• | Mt Cattlin lithium spodumene mine in Ravensthorpe, Western Australia; |
• | Olaroz lithium facility in Jujuy Province, Argentina (of which Allkem owns a 66.5% equity interest); |
• | Cauchari lithium brine project in Jujuy Province, Argentina; |
• | Sal de Vida lithium brine project in Catamarca Province, Argentina; |
• | James Bay lithium spodumene project in Québec, Canada; and |
• | Naraha lithium hydroxide plant in Naraha, Japan (of which Allkem owns a 75% economic interest). |
($ in thousands) | | | Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||
| 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | ||
Revenue | | | 1,207,801 | | | 744,683 | | | 66,370 |
Cost of sales | | | (142,000) | | | (144,521) | | | (25,004) |
Gross profit | | | 1,065,801 | | | 600,162 | | | 41,366 |
Other income | | | 66,023 | | | 31,666 | | | 1,725 |
Corporate and administrative expenses | | | (66,470) | | | (43,509) | | | (16,868) |
Merger and acquisition costs | | | (9,945) | | | (12,760) | | | (1,243) |
Selling expenses | | | (89,562) | | | (57,024) | | | (2,966) |
Depreciation and amortization expense | | | (98,786) | | | (63,310) | | | (18,758) |
Asset impairment and write-downs | | | — | | | (244) | | | — |
Share of net loss of associate | | | (2,114) | | | (2,951) | | | (1,682) |
Foreign currency loss | | | (83,280) | | | (10,260) | | | (3,619) |
Profit/(loss) before interest and income tax | | | 781,667 | | | 441,770 | | | (2,045) |
Finance income | | | 72,311 | | | 5,980 | | | 1,602 |
Finance costs | | | (24,071) | | | (20,180) | | | (22,664) |
Profit/(loss) before income tax | | | 829,907 | | | 427,570 | | | (23,107) |
Income tax expense | | | (305,332) | | | (92,884) | | | (67,940) |
Profit/(loss) after taxation from continuing operations | | | 524,575 | | | 334,686 | | | (91,047) |
(Loss)/Profit after tax for the period from discontinued operations | | | (3,278) | | | 2,537 | | | 1,573 |
Profit/(loss) for the period | | | 521,297 | | | 337,223 | | | (89,474) |
($ in thousands) | | | Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||
| 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | ||
Total profit/(loss) for the period | | | 521,297 | | | 337,223 | | | (89,474) |
Discontinued operations | | | 3,278 | | | (2,537) | | | (1,573) |
Total profit/(loss) for the period – continuing operations | | | 524,575 | | | 334,686 | | | (91,047) |
Add: Income tax expense | | | 305,332 | | | 92,884 | | | 67,940 |
Profit/(loss) for the period before tax | | | 829,907 | | | 427,570 | | | (23,107) |
Add merger and acquisition costs(a) | | | 9,945 | | | 12,760 | | | 1,243 |
Add amortization of customer contracts due to purchase price allocation(b) | | | — | | | 13,400 | | | — |
Add inventory adjustment due to purchase price allocation(b) | | | — | | | 12,367 | | | — |
Less other income(c) | | | (66,023) | | | (31,666) | | | (1,725) |
Add foreign currency (gains)/losses(d) | | | 83,280 | | | 10,260 | | | 3,619 |
Add share of loss of associate, net of tax(e) | | | 2,114 | | | 2,951 | | | 1,682 |
Add impairment/write-downs (writebacks)(f) | | | — | | | 244 | | | 18,138 |
Add interest (income)/costs | | | (48,240) | | | 14,200 | | | 21,062 |
Add depreciation & amortization | | | 98,786 | | | 49,910 | | | 18,758 |
EBITDAIX | | | 909,769 | | | 511,996 | | | 3,394 |
(a) | Merger and acquisition costs (2023: $9.9 million, 2022: $12.8 million, 2021: $1.2 million) are excluded from EBITDAIX because they are nonrecurring. |
(b) | In 2022, $12.4 million related to the realization of inventory at a value in excess of the cost of production and $13.4 million related to the amortization of customer contract assets acquired as a part of the Galaxy/Orocobre Merger and are excluded from EBITDAIX because they are nonrecurring and relate to non-cash valuation adjustments arising from the Galaxy/Orocobre Merger. |
(c) | Represents primarily gain from financial instruments and is excluded from EBITDAIX because it does not relate to operations. |
(d) | Represents realized and unrealized losses on AUD denominated balances in corporate entities, with a USD functional currency, Argentine Peso denominated balances in entities based in Argentina and USD balances in Canadian entities. These amounts are excluded from the calculation of EBITDAIX because they primarily relate to income tax, cash and other transactional tax balances or as associated with long-term capital projections, which are expected to be operations in future periods. |
(e) | Represents the share of loss on the 75% economic interest in TLC and is excluded from EBITDAIX because TLC is constructing a plant that is still in either the development or commissioning phase. |
(f) | Represents impairment of assets and inventory write-down reversals and is excluded from EBITDAIX because the loss (or reversal) is nonrecurring. |
• | The Project Loan Facility for Stage 1 of Olaroz provides for a total of $191.9 million. The Stage 1 loan had an outstanding principal balance of $28.5 million as of June 30, 2023, and an outstanding balance of $48.1 million and $66.9 million as of June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The interest rate for the Stage 1 loan is the Stable Overnight Funding Rate (“SOFR”) plus a margin of 0.80%. The interest rate related to 88.6% of the loan was hedged in 2015 with such rate currently at 4.896% until the last repayment in September 2024. Sales de Jujuy Pte Ltd has provided security in favor of Mizuho Bank over the shares it owns in SDJ and the Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security, which covers 82.35% of the outstanding principal amount; and |
• | The Project Loan Facility for Stage 2 of Olaroz provides for a total of $180 million. The Stage 2 loan had an outstanding balance of $162 million as of June 30, 2023 and an outstanding balance of $180 million and $146 million as of June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The interest rate for the Stage 2 loan is a fixed rate of 2.5119% per annum until September 2023 and then 2.6119% per annum until expiry in March 2029. |
• | The pre-export facility with Bank Macro provides for a facility limit of $13 million as of June 30, 2023, and $8 million as of both June 30, 2022 and 2021. The pre-export facility beared interest at 6% and expired on July 30, 2023 ; and |
• | The working capital facility with HSBC Australia Limited (“HSBC”) provides for a facility limit of A$5 million as of June 30, 2023, and provided for nil as of both June 30, 2022 and 2021. The working capital facility currently bears interest at 5.75% (a variable reference rate set and updated periodically by HSBC for their loan products, less margin of 5.2%) and is an on-demand facility. No amounts have been drawn through and as of June 30, 2023. |
• | A loan that provides for a total of $5.1 million. The loan had an outstanding balance of $5.1 million as of June 30, 2023. For fiscal year 2023, the loan beared interest at SOFR plus a margin of 6% per annum. The loan will be payable prior to July 2024; |
• | A loan that provides for a total of $50.1 million. The loan had an outstanding balance of $39.5 million as of June 30, 2023, and an outstanding balance of $50.1 million as of both June 30, 2022 and 2021. For fiscal year 2023, the loan beared interest at SOFR plus a margin of 6% per annum, as compared to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a margin of 6% per annum for fiscal years 2022 and 2021. The loan will be payable prior to July 2028; |
• | A loan that provides for a total of $39.1 million. The loan had an outstanding balance of $39.1 million as of June 30, 2023, and an outstanding balance of $34.4 million and $23.6 million as of June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. For fiscal year 2023, the loan beared interest at SOFR plus a margin of 6% per annum, as compared to LIBOR plus a margin of 6% per annum for fiscal years 2022 and 2021. The loan will be payable prior to July 2030; and |
• | A loan that provides for a total of $0.3 million. The loan had an outstanding balance of $0.3 million as of each of June 30, 2023, 2022 and 2021. For fiscal year 2023, the loan beared interest at SOFR plus a margin of 0.75% per annum, as compared to LIBOR plus a margin of 0.75% per annum for fiscal years 2022 and 2021. The loan will be payable prior to July 2029. |
• | Mineral rights (including lithium assets); |
• | Exploration and evaluation assets (including key forecast assumptions, such as discount rates, commodity prices and operating and capital costs); |
• | Restoration and rehabilitation provision (including estimation of timing and applicable regulatory and compliance requirements); and |
• | Measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities in various jurisdictions in which Galaxy operated. |
• | Ore reserves; |
• | Timing of expected cash flows; |
• | Exchange rates; |
• | Commodity prices; and |
• | Future capital requirements. |
• | Devaluation of the Argentine Peso compared to the USD; and |
• | Application of specific Argentine tax legislation in respect of inflation. |
• | Discount rates; |
• | Expected cost to dismantle and remove the plant from the site; and |
• | Expected timing of those costs. |
Name | | | Beneficial Ownership on September 6, 2023 Livent Shares | | | Percent of Class |
Paul W. Graves(1) | | | 924,714 | | | * |
Gilberto Antoniazzi(1) | | | 166,264 | | | * |
Sara Ponessa(1) | | | 68,173 | | | * |
Pierre Brondeau(2) | | | 400,250 | | | * |
Michael F. Barry(2) | | | 62,323 | | | * |
G. Peter D’Aloia(2) | | | 202,153 | | | * |
Christina Lampe-Önnerud (2) | | | 27,280 | | | * |
Pablo Marcet(2) | | | 34,280 | | | * |
Steven T. Merkt(2) | | | 44,498 | | | * |
Robert C. Pallash(2) | | | 74,950 | | | * |
Andrea E. Utecht(2) | | | 141,156 | | | * |
All current directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)(1)(2) | | | 2,146,041 | | | 1.2% |
* | Less than one percent of class. |
(1) | For the NEOs, Livent Shares “beneficially owned” include: (i) Livent Shares owned or controlled by the individual; (ii) Livent Shares held in the Livent Nonqualified Savings Plan and the Livent Qualified Savings Plan for the account of the individual (97,816 for Mr. Graves); and (iii) Livent Shares subject to options that are presently exercisable or will be exercisable within 60 days of September 6, 2023 (647,886 for Mr. Graves, 133,724 for Mr. Antoniazzi, 53,334 for Ms. Ponessa, and 834,994 for all current executive officers as a group). |
(2) | For the non-employee directors, Livent Shares “beneficially owned” include: (i) Livent Shares owned or controlled by the individual; and (ii) restricted stock units that are vested as of September 6, 2023 or that will vest within 60 days thereafter (43,998 for Mr. Merkt, 27,848 for Mr. Barry, 51,760 for Mr. Brondeau, 5,380 for Ms. Utecht, 56,452 for Mr. D’Aloia, 27,280 for each of Ms. Lampe-Önnerud and Mr. Marcet, 43,385 for Mr. Pallash, and 283,383 for all directors as a group). Directors have no power to vote or dispose of Livent Shares represented by restricted stock units until the Livent Shares are distributed and, until such distribution, directors have only an unsecured claim against Livent. |
Beneficial Owner | | | Number of Livent Shares Beneficially Owned | | | Percent of Outstanding Livent Shares |
BlackRock, Inc.(1) 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022 | | | 28,767,522 | | | 16.0% |
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2) 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355 | | | 20,001,456 | | | 11.1% |
(1) | Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed by such beneficial owner with the SEC on January 26, 2023, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 28,430,537 Livent Shares and sole dispositive power over 28,767,522 Livent Shares. |
(2) | Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed by such beneficial owner with the SEC on February 9, 2023, The Vanguard Group, Inc. has sole dispositive power over 19,547,781 Livent Shares, shared voting power over 281,904 Livent Shares and shared dispositive power over 453,675 Livent Shares. |
| | Allkem Shares Beneficially Owned (1) | ||||
Name | | | Number | | | Percentage |
>5% Shareholders | | | | | ||
Toyota Tsusho Corporation(2) | | | 39,296,636 | | | 6.15% |
State Street Corporation(3) | | | 35,185,964 | | | 5.50% |
Directors and Executive Officers | | | | | ||
Peter Coleman | | | 33,025 | | | * |
Martín Pérez de Solay | | | 793,317 | | | * |
Fernando Oris de Roa | | | 70,000 | | | * |
Leanne Heywood | | | 25,002 | | | * |
Alan Fitzpatrick | | | 7,320 | | | * |
John Turner | | | 90,960 | | | * |
Florencia Heredia | | | 10,650 | | | * |
Richard Seville | | | 3,000,000 | | | * |
Christian Cortes | | | 78,893 | | | * |
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (9 Persons) | | | 4,109,167 | | | * |
* | Less than one percent of the outstanding Allkem Shares. |
(1) | In accordance with SEC rules, each listed shareholder’s beneficial ownership includes: (i) all Allkem Shares the shareholder actually owns beneficially or of record; (ii) all Allkem Shares over which the shareholder has or shares voting or investment control; and (iii) all Allkem Shares subject to Allkem Performance Rights that are vested and exercisable as of, or will vest and become exercisable within 60 days of September 6, 2023 (including 367,686 Allkem Shares for Mr. Pérez de Solay and 78,893 Allkem Shares for Mr. Cortes). |
(2) | Based on information set forth in filings made by TTC and certain of its affiliates with the ASX pursuant to the Australian Corporations Act on August 26, 2021, which are the most recent such filings. TTC’s address is 4-9-8, Meieki, Nakamura-ku, Nagoya 450-8575, Japan. TTC’s beneficial ownership percentage was calculated by dividing the 39,296,636 Allkem Shares reported as held by TTC on August 26, 2021 by the 639,321,293 Allkem Shares outstanding as of September 6, 2023. |
(3) | Based on information set forth in filings made by State Street Corporation and certain of its affiliates with the ASX pursuant to the Australian Corporations Act on September 12, 2023. State Street Corporation’s address is One Congress Street Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2016. State Street Corporation’s beneficial ownership percentage was calculated by dividing the 35,185,964 Allkem Shares reported as held by State Street Corporation on September 12, 2023 by the 639,321,293 Allkem Shares outstanding as of September 6, 2023. |
• | holders of CDIs do not have legal title in the underlying NewCo Shares to which the CDIs relate (the chain of title in the NewCo Shares underlying the CDIs is summarized above); |
• | holders of CDIs are not able to vote personally as shareholders at a meeting of NewCo. Instead, holders of CDIs are provided with a voting instruction form which will enable them to instruct the Depositary Nominee in relation to the exercise of voting rights. In addition, a holder of CDIs is able to request the Depositary Nominee to appoint the CDI holder or a third party nominated by the CDI holder as its proxy so that the proxy so appointed may exercise the votes attaching to the NewCo Shares; and |
• | holders of CDIs will not be directly entitled to certain other rights conferred on holders of NewCo Shares, including the right to apply to a Bailiwick of Jersey court for an order on the grounds that the affairs of NewCo are being conducted in a manner which is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of NewCo shareholders; and the right to apply to the Jersey Financial Services Commission to have an inspector appointed to investigate the affairs of NewCo. |
Livent | | | NewCo |
sections of the DGCL would govern the redemption of such shares of preferred stock. | | | redeemable in accordance with their terms or at the option of NewCo and/or at the option of the holder (provided that an issued non-redeemable share may only be converted into a redeemable share with the agreement of the applicable holder (which agreement will be deemed to exist with respect to any non-redeemable shares tendered by such holder for conversion, repurchase, buy back or redemption and regardless of whether or not such holder is aware that NewCo is the purchaser of such shares in such transaction) or pursuant to a special resolution). Subject to the provisions of the Jersey Companies Law and the NewCo articles of association, NewCo may purchase its own shares (including any redeemable shares) or CDIs and either cancel them or hold them as treasury shares. Under Jersey law, NewCo’s purchase of its own shares or CDIs must be sanctioned by a special resolution of NewCo’s shareholders. If the purchase is to be made on a stock exchange, the special resolution must specify the maximum number of shares or CDIs to be purchased, the maximum and minimum prices which may be paid, and the date on which the authority to purchase is to expire (which may not be more than five years after the date of the resolution). If the purchase is to be made other than on a stock exchange, the purchase must be made pursuant to a written purchase contract approved in advance by a resolution of shareholders. The shares being purchased do not carry the right to vote on the resolution sanctioning the purchase or approving that contract. However, the NewCo articles of association permit its board of directors to convert any of its shares into redeemable shares with the consent of the holder of such shares, and thus allow the board of directors to authorize share redemptions in this manner without a special resolution of NewCo’s shareholders. |
| | ||
Rights to Dividends | |||
| | ||
Section 170 of the DGCL provides that the directors of a corporation may declare and pay dividends upon the shares of its capital stock subject to certain limitations. | | | The NewCo board of directors may declare and pay any dividends from time to time as the NewCo board of directors may determine. The NewCo board of directors may rescind a decision to pay a dividend before the payment date in its sole discretion. The payment of a dividend does not require shareholder confirmation or approval at a general meeting of the shareholders. Holders of NewCo Shares are entitled to receive equally, on a per share basis, any dividends that may be declared on a per share basis as adjusted with |
Livent | | | NewCo |
| | reference to any portion of the share, which is not fully paid. The NewCo board of directors may direct that a dividend will be satisfied from any available source permitted by law, including wholly or partly by the distribution of assets, including paid-up shares or securities of another company. If, in the future, NewCo declares cash dividends, such dividends will be declared in U.S. dollars. The NewCo articles of association permits the NewCo board of directors to require that all dividend payments will be paid only through electronic transfer into an account selected by the shareholder rather than by a bank cheque. | |
| | ||
Appraisal Rights | |||
| | ||
In general under the DGCL, in connection with a merger or consolidation (subject to certain exceptions, such as that described below) stockholders will have appraisal rights in connection with such merger or consolidation. Pursuant to the DGCL, stockholders who properly request and perfect appraisal rights in connection with such merger or consolidation, as applicable, will have the right to receive payment of the fair value of their shares as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery. However, Livent stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL in connection with the merger because Livent Shares are listed on the NYSE and holders of eligible shares of Livent are not required to receive consideration other than shares of NewCo, which are expected to be listed on the NYSE. | | | No appraisal rights are available to shareholders of a company organized under the laws of the Bailiwick of Jersey. |
| | ||
Disclosure of Interests | |||
| | ||
Holders of beneficial interests in Livent Shares must comply with the beneficial ownership disclosure obligations contained in section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder. | | | Holders of beneficial interests in NewCo Shares must comply with the beneficial ownership disclosure obligations contained in section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder. Under the NewCo articles of association, NewCo may, by written notice, require any person whom NewCo knows or has reasonable cause to believe to hold an interest in NewCo Shares or to have held an interest at any time during the three years prior, to confirm whether that is the case and give further information as to their interest as requested. Where a person fails to comply with such notice within the reasonable time period specified in the notice or has made a statement which is false or inadequate, then, unless the NewCo board of directors determines otherwise, the following |
Livent | | | NewCo |
The DGCL provides that stockholders are not entitled to the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless the corporation’s certificate of incorporation provides otherwise, and Livent’s certificate of incorporation is silent on this point. The Livent certificate of incorporation provides that the holders of Livent common stock are entitled to vote on all matters on which stockholders are generally entitled to vote, except that holders of common stock are not entitled to vote on any amendment to the certificate of incorporation that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding classes or series of preferred stock if the holders of such affected class or series are entitled, either separately or together with the holders of one or more other such classes or series, to vote thereon under the certificate of incorporation or pursuant to Delaware law. | | | An ordinary resolution requires approval by the holders of a majority of the voting rights represented at a meeting, in person or by proxy, and voting thereon. A special resolution requires approval by the holders of two-thirds of the voting rights represented at a meeting, in person or by proxy, and voting thereon (or such greater majority as the NewCo articles of association may prescribe). Voting rights with respect to any class of preferred shares (if any) will be determined by the NewCo board of directors and set out in the relevant statement of rights for such class. Neither Jersey law nor the NewCo articles of association restrict non-resident shareholders from holding or exercising voting rights in relation of NewCo Shares. There are no provisions in the Jersey Companies Law relating to cumulative voting. |
| | ||
Action by Written Consent | |||
| | ||
Under the DGCL, unless otherwise provided for in the corporation’s certificate of incorporation, any action required to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders, or any action which may be taken at a meeting of the stockholders, may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, are signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted. Livent’s certificate of incorporation prohibits stockholder actions to be taken by written consent in lieu of a meeting because no one person or group beneficially owns a majority of the outstanding shares of all classes and series of Livent capital stock entitled to vote at a special meeting of stockholders. | | | Under Jersey law, unless prohibited by a company’s articles of association, a unanimous resolution in writing passed by each shareholder entitled to vote on the matter may affect any matter that otherwise may be brought before a shareholders’ meeting, except for the removal of auditors. The NewCo articles of association prohibit shareholder actions to be taken by unanimous written resolution. Under the NewCo articles of association, any action required or permitted to be taken by shareholders or any class of them must be effected at a general meeting of NewCo or of the class in question and may not be effected by any consent or resolution in writing of the shareholders. |
| | ||
Quorum | |||
| | ||
Under the DGCL and Livent bylaws, the holders of a majority of the total number of shares issued and outstanding, and entitled to vote at the applicable meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at all meetings of the stockholders for the transaction of the business; provided, however, that where a separate vote by a class or classes or series is required, the holders of a | | | Under the NewCo articles of association, no business may be transacted at any general meeting unless a quorum (the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the shares entitled to vote at such meeting) is present in person or by proxy at the time when the meeting proceeds to business. |
Livent | | | NewCo |
The Livent bylaws also provide that the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors may not nominate for election or reelection as director any candidate who has not agreed to tender, promptly following the meeting at which he or she is elected as director, an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon (a) the failure to receive the required number of votes for reelection at the next annual meeting of stockholders at which he or she faces reelection, and (b) acceptance of such resignation by the board of directors. If an incumbent director nominee fails to receive the required number of votes for reelection, within 90 days after certificate of the election results, the nominating and corporate governance committee of the board of directors will recommend to the board of directors whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken and the board of directors will act on such committee’s recommendation. | | | irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon (i) the failure to receive the required number of votes for re-election at the next annual meeting of shareholders at which he or she faces re-election, and (ii) acceptance of such resignation by the NewCo board of directors. The NewCo articles of association provide that if an incumbent director does not receive the required number of votes for re-election, within 90 days after certification of the election results, a governance committee of the NewCo board of directors will recommend to the board whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken and the NewCo board of directors will act on such recommendation. Under the NewCo articles of association, all directors are subject to annual re-election by shareholders. Directors will hold office until the conclusion of the next annual general meeting following his or her appointment, unless such director is re-elected at the general meeting. Where the number of persons validly proposed for election or re-election as a director is greater than the number of directors to be elected, the persons receiving the most votes (up to the number of directors to be elected) will be elected as directors and an absolute majority of votes cast will not be a pre-requisite to the election of such directors. |
| | ||
Removal | |||
| | ||
Under the Livent bylaws and certificate of incorporation, and subject to certain stockholder rights stated therein, a director may only be removed for cause. | | | Under the NewCo articles of association, a director may only be removed from office by ordinary resolution of NewCo shareholders in a general meeting for cause, including, but not limited to: • the director’s conviction (with a plea of nolo contendere deemed to be a conviction) of a serious felony involving moral turpitude or a violation of U.S. federal or state securities law, but excluding a conviction based entirely on vicarious liability; or • the director’s commission of any material act of dishonesty (such as embezzlement) resulting or intended to result in material personal gain or enrichment of the director at the expense of NewCo or any subsidiary and which act, if made subject to criminal charges, would be reasonably likely to be charged as a felony. |
Livent | | | NewCo |
of the corporation and upon such information, opinions, reports and statements presented to the corporation by corporate officers, employees, committees of the board of directors or other persons as to matters such member reasonably believes are within such other person’s professional or expert competence, provided that such other person has been selected with reasonable care by or on behalf of the corporation. | | | • exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. Customary law is also an important source of law in the area of directors’ duties in Jersey as it expands upon and provides a more detailed understanding of the general duties and obligations of directors. The Bailiwick of Jersey courts view English common law as highly persuasive in this area. In summary, the following duties will apply as manifestations of the general fiduciary duty under the Jersey Companies Law: Duty to act in good faith A director has a duty to act in what he or she bona fide considers to be the best interests of the company. He or she must not act for any collateral purpose. In keeping with such a position of trust, the courts will give the individual director discretion to determine this, and are likely only to infer that he or she was not acting in good faith if no reasonable director could have believed that the course of action was in the best interests of the company. Generally, as with other fiduciary duties, the duty of good faith is owed by every director individually and not collectively as a board and is owed only to the company and not to any other person, be it another company or an individual. Duty to act with diligence A director will be responsible for the conduct of the company’s business and have a duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence in doing so. Therefore the directors should keep fully informed as to the financial position of the company, and seek to attend board meetings and participate in the management of the company whenever possible. |
| | Duty to exercise powers for a proper purpose Even if directors are acting in good faith and in the interests of the company and its shareholders as a whole, they must nevertheless use their powers for the purposes for which they were conferred and not for any collateral purpose. Duty to account for profits Jersey law generally precludes a director from taking a personal profit from any opportunities arising from his |
Livent | | | NewCo |
• any merger, sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition (in one transaction or a series of transactions) to or with any interested stockholder or any affiliate of any interested stockholder of any assets of Livent or any subsidiary having an aggregate fair market value of $20,000,000 or more; or • the issuance or transfer by Livent or any subsidiary (in one transaction or a series of transactions) of any securities of Livent or any subsidiary to any interested stockholder or any affiliate of any interested stockholder in exchange for cash, securities or other property (or a combination thereof) having an aggregate fair market value of $20,000,000 or more; or • the adoption of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of Livent proposed by or on behalf of an interested stockholder or any affiliate of any interested stockholder; or • any reclassification of securities (including any reverse stock split), or recapitalization of Livent, or any merger or consolidation of Livent with any of its subsidiaries or any other transaction (whether or not with or into or otherwise involving an interested stockholder) which has the effect, directly or indirectly, of increasing the proportionate share of the outstanding shares of any class of equity or convertible securities of Livent or any subsidiary which is directly or indirectly owned by any interested stockholder or any affiliate of any interested stockholder. An “interested stockholder” includes any person (other than Livent, any subsidiary or any employee benefit plan of Livent) who or which: • is the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 10% of the voting power of the outstanding voting stock; • is an affiliate of Livent and at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 10% of the voting power of the then-outstanding voting stock; or • is an assignee of or has otherwise succeeded to any shares of voting stock which were at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question beneficially owned by any | | |
Livent | | | NewCo |
in any manner prescribed by Delaware law or the Livent certificate of incorporation, and all rights granted to stockholders are subject to such reservation. Subject to the requirements described above, the Livent bylaws may otherwise be amended at any regular or special meeting of the board of directors or of the stockholders, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the whole board of directors, or by the affirmative vote of a majority of the stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, as the case may be. | | |
• | six current Allkem directors (each of whom has been nominated by Allkem); and |
• | six current Livent directors (each of whom has been nominated by Livent). |
• | The NewCo board of directors will consist of 12 directors, six of whom will be from the existing Allkem Board, and six of whom will be from the existing Livent Board, including the current Chief Executive Officer of Livent. The initial Chair of the NewCo board of directors will be the Chairman of the existing Allkem Board as of immediately prior to the scheme implementation. |
• | At least four standing committees of the NewCo board of directors, including an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Sustainability Committee. |
• | Each of the Chair of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee as of the effective time will be from the existing Allkem Board, as determined by Allkem prior to the scheme effectiveness. Each of the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Sustainability Committee as of the effective time will be from the existing Livent Board, as determined by Livent prior to the scheme effectiveness. |
• | reviewing the annual report, proxy statement and periodic SEC filings, such as NewCo’s reports on Form 10-K and 10-Q, and ensuring that NewCo’s financial reports fairly represent its operations, performance and condition; |
• | reviewing with management NewCo’s earnings releases; |
• | reviewing the effectiveness and adequacy of NewCo’s internal controls; |
• | reviewing significant changes in accounting policies; |
• | selecting an independent registered public accounting firm and confirming its independence; |
• | pre-approving audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm; and |
• | reviewing the effectiveness, scope and performance of activities of the independent registered public accounting firm and the internal audit function. |
• | reviewing and approving executive compensation policies and practices and establishing total compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, among other officers; |
• | reviewing annually NewCo’s compensation programs, policies and practices; |
• | reviewing the terms of employment agreements, severance agreements, change in control agreements and other compensatory arrangements; |
• | monitoring corporate programs relating to diversity, equity and inclusion; |
• | recommending to the board of directors NewCo’s submissions to shareholders on executive compensation matters and assessing the results of such votes; and |
• | reviewing executive stock ownership guidelines and overseeing clawback, hedging, and pledging policies. |
• | reviewing and recommending director candidates; |
• | recommending the number, function, composition and Chairs of the board of directors’ committees; |
• | overseeing corporate governance, including an annual review of governance principles; |
• | reviewing and approving director compensation policies, including the determination of director compensation; |
• | overseeing board of directors and committee evaluation procedures; and |
• | determining director independence. |
• | reviewing and overseeing employee occupational safety and health, and process safety programs; |
• | monitoring environmental responsibility and risk mitigation programs, including those relating to climate change, green-house gases, water, waste, energy and biodiversity; |
• | monitoring corporate social responsibility programs, including those relating to community, health and safety, human rights and responsible supply chain; |
• | reviewing sustainability disclosures; |
• | monitoring audits and assurance of sustainability data and data collection methodology, including through independent third party audits, studies, and sustainability rating bodies; and |
• | reviewing and overseeing sustainability management systems. |
• | the applicable U.S. courts had jurisdiction over the case, as recognized under Jersey law; |
• | the judgment is given on the merits and is final, conclusive and non-appealable; |
• | the judgment relates to the payment of a sum of money, not being taxes, fines or similar governmental penalties; |
• | the defendant is not immune under the principles of public international law; |
• | the same matters at issue in the case were not previously the subject of a judgment or disposition in a separate court; |
• | the judgment was not obtained by fraud; and |
• | the recognition and enforcement of the judgment is not contrary to public policy in Jersey. |
• | Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, filed with the SEC on February 24, 2023; |
• | Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2023, filed with the SEC on May 4, 2023 and for the quarter ended June 30, 2023, filed with the SEC on August 4, 2023; |
• | Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 16, 2023; and |
• | Current Reports on Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2023, May 10, 2023, August 2, 2023 and September 25, 2023. |
| | Page No. | |
Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended June 30, 2023, 2022 and 2021 | | | |
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| |
• | Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. |
• | Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. |
• | Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. |
• | Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements. |
• | Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | ||
| | Note | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | |
Revenue | | | 1 | | | 1,207,801 | | | 744,683 | | | 66,370 |
Cost of sales | | | | | (142,000) | | | (144,521) | | | (25,004) | |
Gross profit | | | | | 1,065,801 | | | 600,162 | | | 41,366 | |
Other income | | | 3a | | | 66,023 | | | 31,666 | | | 1,725 |
Corporate and administrative expenses | | | 3b | | | (66,470) | | | (43,509) | | | (16,868) |
Merger and acquisition costs | | | | | (9,945) | | | (12,760) | | | (1,243) | |
Selling expenses | | | 3c | | | (89,562) | | | (57,024) | | | (2,966) |
Depreciation and amortisation expense | | | 10,11 | | | (98,786) | | | (63,310) | | | (18,758) |
Asset impairment and write-downs | | | | | — | | | (244) | | | — | |
Share of net loss of associate | | | 22 | | | (2,114) | | | (2,951) | | | (1,682) |
Foreign currency loss | | | 3d | | | (83,280) | | | (10,260) | | | (3,619) |
Profit/(loss) before interest and income tax | | | | | 781,667 | | | 441,770 | | | (2,045) | |
Finance income | | | 3e | | | 72,311 | | | 5,980 | | | 1,602 |
Finance costs | | | 3f | | | (24,071) | | | (20,180) | | | (22,664) |
Profit/(loss) before income tax | | | | | 829,907 | | | 427,570 | | | (23,107) | |
Income tax expense | | | 5a | | | (305,332) | | | (92,884) | | | (67,940) |
| | | | | | | | |||||
Profit/(loss) after taxation from continuing operations | | | | | 524,575 | | | 334,686 | | | (91,047) | |
Discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | | ||||
(Loss)/profit after tax for the period from discontinued operations | | | 2 | | | (3,278) | | | 2,537 | | | 1,573 |
Profit/(loss) for the period | | | | | 521,297 | | | 337,223 | | | (89,474) | |
| | | | | | | | |||||
Profit/(loss) for the year attributable to: | | | | | | | | | ||||
Owners of the parent entity | | | | | 441,711 | | | 305,674 | | | (59,625) | |
Non-controlling interests | | | | | 79,586 | | | 31,549 | | | (29,849) | |
| | | | | | | | |||||
Profit/(loss) for the period | | | | | 521,297 | | | 337,223 | | | (89,474) | |
| | | | | | | | |||||
Earnings per share for profit/(loss) attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company | | | | | | | | | ||||
Basic earnings per share (US cents per share) | | | 6 | | | 69.31 | | | 51.59 | | | (18.02) |
Diluted earnings per share (US cents per share) | | | 6 | | | 68.92 | | | 51.34 | | | (18.02) |
Earnings per share for profit/(loss) from continuing operations attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company | | | | | | | | | ||||
Basic earnings per share (US cents per share) | | | 6 | | | 69.82 | | | 51.16 | | | (18.50) |
Diluted earnings per share (US cents per share) | | | 6 | | | 69.43 | | | 50.91 | | | (18.50) |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | ||
| | Note | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | |
Profit/(loss) for the period | | | | | 521,297 | | | 337,223 | | | (89,474) | |
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax | | | | | | | | | ||||
(Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss) | | | | | | | | | ||||
Foreign currency translation (losses)/gains – subsidiaries | | | 16b | | | (19,291) | | | (2,560) | | | 1,500 |
Foreign currency translation losses – associate | | | 16b | | | (458) | | | (291) | | | (88) |
Net gains on revaluation of derivatives – hedging instruments | | | | | 1,010 | | | 2,945 | | | 2,159 | |
(Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss) | | | | | | | | | ||||
Changes in fair value of financial assets designated at fair value through other comprehensive income | | | 16b | | | (424) | | | (5,985) | | | — |
Other comprehensive (loss)/income for the year, net of tax | | | | | (19,163) | | | (5,891) | | | 3,571 | |
| | | | | | | | |||||
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year, net of tax | | | | | 502,134 | | | 331,332 | | | (85,903) | |
| | | | | | | | |||||
Total comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to: | | | | | | | | | ||||
Owners of the parent entity | | | | | 422,210 | | | 298,797 | | | (56,777) | |
Non-controlling interests | | | | | 79,924 | | | 32,535 | | | (29,126) | |
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year, net of tax | | | | | 502,134 | | | 331,332 | | | (85,903) |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | ||
| | Note | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | |
Current assets | | | | | | | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 17 | | | 821,429 | | | 663,538 |
Trade and other receivables | | | 7 | | | 142,915 | | | 81,804 |
Inventory | | | 9 | | | 126,474 | | | 76,241 |
Prepayments | | | 8 | | | 30,879 | | | 10,298 |
Total current assets | | | | | 1,121,697 | | | 831,881 | |
Non-current assets | | | | | | | |||
Other receivables | | | 7 | | | 42,724 | | | 49,241 |
Inventory | | | 9 | | | 86,665 | | | 53,402 |
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | | | | | 3,474 | | | 4,048 | |
Other financial assets | | | 17 | | | 21,372 | | | 16,356 |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 10 | | | 2,943,452 | | | 2,557,882 |
Intangible assets | | | 11 | | | 520,487 | | | 525,012 |
Exploration and evaluation assets | | | 12 | | | 467,557 | | | 424,961 |
Investment in associate | | | 22 | | | 4,017 | | | 890 |
Other non-current assets | | | | | 2,670 | | | 3,841 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 5b | | | 3,078 | | | 25,217 |
Total non-current assets | | | | | 4,095,496 | | | 3,660,850 | |
Total assets | | | | | 5,217,193 | | | 4,492,731 | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | |||
Trade and other payables | | | 14 | | | 137,354 | | | 96,443 |
Derivative financial instruments | | | | | — | | | 1,086 | |
Loans and borrowings | | | 17 | | | 42,519 | | | 37,574 |
Provisions | | | 15 | | | 13,870 | | | 14,297 |
Lease liabilities | | | 13 | | | 13,329 | | | 10,197 |
Income tax payable | | | | | 176,174 | | | 44,692 | |
Other liabilities | | | | | 62,600 | | | 18,247 | |
Total current liabilities | | | | | 445,846 | | | 222,536 | |
Non-current liabilities | | | | | | | |||
Other payables | | | 14 | | | 29,022 | | | 30,973 |
Derivative financial instruments | | | | | — | | | 336 | |
Loans and borrowings | | | 17 | | | 231,756 | | | 274,103 |
Provisions | | | 15 | | | 47,456 | | | 59,350 |
Lease liabilities | | | 13 | | | 39,917 | | | 38,222 |
Deferred tax liability | | | 5c | | | 849,445 | | | 785,845 |
Total non-current liabilities | | | | | 1,197,596 | | | 1,188,829 | |
Total liabilities | | | | | 1,643,442 | | | 1,411,365 | |
Net assets | | | | | 3,573,751 | | | 3,081,366 | |
Equity | | | | | | | |||
Issued capital | | | 16a | | | 2,686,134 | | | 2,686,134 |
Treasury shares | | | 16a | | | (2,311) | | | — |
Reserves | | | 16b | | | (5,790) | | | (14,114) |
Retained earnings | | | | | 725,131 | | | 316,554 | |
Equity attributable to the owners of Allkem | | | | | 3,403,164 | | | 2,988,574 | |
Equity attributable to non-controlling interests | | | | | 170,587 | | | 92,792 | |
Total equity | | | | | 3,573,751 | | | 3,081,366 |
| | Note | | | Issued capital US$’000 | | | Treasury Shares US$’000 | | | Reserves US$’000 | | | Retained earnings US$’000 | | | Total US$’000 | | | Non- controlling interests US$’000 | | | Total US$’000 | |
Balance as at 1 July 2020 | | | | | 548,462 | | | — | | | (16,608) | | | 70,505 | | | 602,359 | | | 88,215 | | | 690,574 | |
Loss for the year | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (59,625) | | | (59,625) | | | (29,849) | | | (89,474) | |
Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year | | | 16b | | | — | | | — | | | 2,848 | | | — | | | 2,848 | | | 723 | | | 3,571 |
Total comprehensive income/(loss) | | | | | — | | | — | | | 2,848 | | | (59,625) | | | (56,777) | | | (29,126) | | | (85,903) | |
Shares issued during the year i) | | | 16a | | | 120,050 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 120,050 | | | — | | | 120,050 |
Share-based payments | | | 16b | | | — | | | — | | | 1,902 | | | — | | | 1,902 | | | — | | | 1,902 |
Other movements | | | | | — | | | — | | | (806) | | | — | | | (806) | | | (726) | | | (1,532) | |
Balance as at 30 June 2021 | | | | | 668,512 | | | — | | | (12,664) | | | 10,880 | | | 666,728 | | | 58,363 | | | 725,091 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2021 | | | | | 668,512 | | | — | | | (12,664) | | | 10,880 | | | 666,728 | | | 58,363 | | | 725,091 | |
Profit for the year | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 305,674 | | | 305,674 | | | 31,549 | | | 337,223 | |
Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year | | | 16b | | | — | | | — | | | (6,877) | | | — | | | (6,877) | | | 986 | | | (5,891) |
Total comprehensive income/(loss) | | | | | — | | | — | | | (6,877) | | | 305,674 | | | 298,797 | | | 32,535 | | | 331,332 | |
Shares issued during the year i) | | | 16a | | | 2,017,622 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,017,622 | | | — | | | 2,017,622 |
Share-based payments | | | 16b | | | — | | | — | | | 5,427 | | | — | | | 5,427 | | | — | | | 5,427 |
Other movements | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,894 | | | 1,894 | |
Balance as at 30 June 2022 | | | | | 2,686,134 | | | — | | | (14,114) | | | 316,554 | | | 2,988,574 | | | 92,792 | | | 3,081,366 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2022 | | | | | 2,686,134 | | | — | | | (14,114) | | | 316,554 | | | 2,988,574 | | | 92,792 | | | 3,081,366 | |
Profit for the year | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 441,711 | | | 441,711 | | | 79,586 | | | 521,297 | |
Reclassification to profit or loss | | | 2,16b | | | — | | | — | | | 5,749 | | | — | | | 5,749 | | | — | | | 5,749 |
Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year | | | 16b | | | — | | | — | | | (25,250) | | | — | | | (25,250) | | | 338 | | | (24,912) |
Total comprehensive income/(loss) | | | | | — | | | — | | | (19,501) | | | 441,711 | | | 422,210 | | | 79,924 | | | 502,134 | |
Acquisition of treasury shares | | | 16a | | | — | | | (17,939) | | | — | | | — | | | (17,939) | | | — | | | (17,939) |
Issue of treasury shares for share-based payments | | | 16a | | | — | | | 15,628 | | | (15,628) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Share-based payments | | | 16b | | | — | | | — | | | 11,048 | | | — | | | 11,048 | | | — | | | 11,048 |
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests ii) | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3,706) | | | (3,706) | |
Transfer of retained earnings to legal and discretionary reserve | | | 16b | | | — | | | — | | | 32,405 | | | (32,405) | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Other | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (729) | | | (729) | | | 1,577 | | | 848 | |
Balance as at 30 June 2023 | | | | | 2,686,134 | | | (2,311) | | | (5,790) | | | 725,131 | | | 3,403,164 | | | 170,587 | | | 3,573,751 |
i) | Shares issued are net of transaction costs (net of tax) |
ii) | Dividends paid by subsidiaries in the Group that had non-controlling interests |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | ||
| | Note | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | | | | ||||
Receipts from customers | | | | | 1,200,846 | | | 730,342 | | | 89,165 | |
Payments to suppliers and employees | | | | | (371,700) | | | (284,191) | | | (97,133) | |
Interest received | | | | | 54,958 | | | 6,003 | | | 1,993 | |
Interest paid | | | | | (14,066) | | | (10,544) | | | (12,435) | |
Income tax paid | | | | | (79,128) | | | — | | | — | |
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities | | | 25 | | | 790,910 | | | 441,610 | | | (18,410) |
| | | | | | | | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | | | | | ||||
Cash acquired from business combination | | | | | — | | | 209,525 | | | — | |
Payments for exploration and evaluation assets | | | | | (40,497) | | | (22,699) | | | (1,105) | |
Proceeds from the sale of assets | | | | | — | | | 1,499 | | | 2,450 | |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | | | | | (493,721) | | | (238,719) | | | (96,508) | |
Loans provided to related party | | | | | (15,471) | | | (18,700) | | | — | |
Proceeds from financial instruments | | | | | 66,359 | | | 32,033 | | | 2,711 | |
Proceeds from financial assets | | | | | — | | | — | | | 815 | |
Payment for deposits | | | | | (5,017) | | | — | | | — | |
Payments for investment in associate | | | 22 | | | (5,699) | | | — | | | — |
Cash disposed from disposal of subsidiary | | | 2 | | | (14,468) | | | — | | | — |
Proceeds on disposal of subsidiary | | | 2 | | | 200 | | | — | | | — |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | | | (508,314) | | | (37,061) | | | (91,637) | |
| | | | | | | | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | | | | | ||||
Proceeds from issue of shares (net of transaction costs) | | | | | — | | | (636) | | | 119,351 | |
Payments of treasury shares | | | 16a | | | (17,939) | | | — | | | — |
Payments of lease liabilities | | | | | (9,302) | | | (9,413) | | | (3,323) | |
Proceeds from borrowings | | | | | — | | | 44,800 | | | 113,971 | |
Proceeds from minority interests | | | | | 838 | | | 1,894 | | | — | |
Repayment of borrowings | | | | | (36,121) | | | (33,673) | | | (31,045) | |
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests | | | | | (3,705) | | | — | | | — | |
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities | | | | | (66,229) | | | 2,972 | | | 198,954 | |
| | | | | | | | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | | | 216,367 | | | 407,521 | | | 88,907 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, net of overdrafts, at the beginning of the year | | | | | 663,538 | | | 258,319 | | | 171,836 | |
Effect of exchange rates on cash holdings in foreign currencies | | | | | (58,476) | | | (2,302) | | | (2,424) | |
| | | | | | | | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, net of overdrafts, at the end of the year | | | 17 | | | 821,429 | | | 663,538 | | | 258,319 |
- | Have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), |
- | Have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value, |
- | Are presented in US Dollars ($US or USD), with all amounts in the financial report being rounded off to the nearest thousand US Dollars, unless otherwise indicated, |
- | Where necessary, comparative information has been reclassified to conform with changes in presentation in the current year. |
- | Revenue and expenses of Borax Argentina S.A., a discontinued operation as at the date of the financial statements, have been re-presented in the consolidated statement of profit and loss, and in the 2022 and 2021 comparatives to separately disclose the contribution of discontinued operations. The restatement reflects the sale of Borax Argentina S.A. which was completed on 16 December 2022 and is detailed in Note 2. |
- | Adopt all new and amended Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the IASB that are relevant to the operations of the Group and effective for reporting periods beginning on or before 1 July 2022, and |
- | Equity accounting for its associate is detailed in Note 22. |
Note | | | Critical accounting policy |
1 | | | Revenue |
4 | | | Business Combination |
10 | | | Impairment |
5 | | | Deferred Taxation |
9 | | | Inventory |
12 | | | Exploration and evaluation |
15 | | | Provision for rehabilitation |
20 | | | Share-based payments |
- | asset carrying values may be affected due to changes in estimated future production levels, |
- | depreciation, depletion and amortisation charged in the statement of profit or loss may change where such charges are determined on the units of production basis, or where the useful economic lives of assets change, |
- | decommissioning, site restoration and environmental provisions may change where changes in estimated resources affect expectations about the timing or cost of these activities, |
- | the carrying amount of deferred tax assets may change due to changes in estimates of the likely recovery of the tax benefits. |
| | | | | | | | Movement (%) | | | Movement (%) | ||||
Spot Rates | | | 30 June 2023 | | | 30 June 2022 | | | 30 June 2021 | | | 30 June 2023 to 30 June 2022 | | | 30 June 2022 to 30 June 2021 |
ARS -> USD 1 | | | 256.7000 | | | 125.2300 | | | 95.7100 | | | (104.98%) | | | (30.84%) |
YEN -> USD 1 | | | 144.6761 | | | 136.3778 | | | 110.4914 | | | (6.08%) | | | (23.43%) |
AUD-> USD 1 | | | 1.5083 | | | 1.4516 | | | 1.3301 | | | (3.91%) | | | (9.13%) |
CAD-> USD 1 | | | 1.3294 | | | 1.2897 | | | 1.2394 | | | (3.08%) | | | (4.06%) |
Average Rates (Year) | | | | | | | | | | | |||||
ARS -> USD 1 | | | 247.8067 | | | 105.4145 | | | 83.8555 | | | (135.08%) | | | (25.71%) |
YEN -> USD 1 | | | 140.9211 | | | 117.2517 | | | 106.4626 | | | (20.19%) | | | (10.13%) |
AUD-> USD 1 | | | 1.4909 | | | 1.3774 | | | 1.3412 | | | (8.24%) | | | (2.70%) |
CAD-> USD 1 | | | 1.3309 | | | 1.2652 | | | 1.2832 | | | (5.19%) | | | 1.40% |
| | Corporate | | | Olaroz | | | Mt Cattlin | | | Sal De Vida | | | James Bay | | | Total before eliminations | | | Eliminations on consolidation | | | Total Group | |
| | 2023 | | | 2023 | | | 2023 | | | 2023 | | | 2023 | | | 2023 | | | 2023 | | | 2023 | |
| | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | |
Revenue | | | — | | | 592,211 | | | 615,590 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,207,801 | | | — | | | 1,207,801 |
EBITDAIX(1) | | | (36,092) | | | 475,181 | | | 515,881 | | | (146) | | | (702) | | | 954,122 | | | (44,353) | | | 909,769 |
Less depreciation & amortisation | | | (1,363) | | | (16,320) | | | (80,259) | | | (786) | | | (58) | | | (98,786) | | | — | | | (98,786) |
EBITIX(2) | | | (37,455) | | | 458,861 | | | 435,622 | | | (932) | | | (760) | | | 855,336 | | | (44,353) | | | 810,983 |
Less interest income/(costs) | | | 39,367 | | | 13,830 | | | 18,119 | | | (9,942) | | | (4) | | | 61,370 | | | (13,130) | | | 48,240 |
EBTIX(3) | | | 1,912 | | | 472,691 | | | 453,741 | | | (10,874) | | | (764) | | | 916,706 | | | (57,483) | | | 859,223 |
Less merger costs(4) | | | (9,514) | | | — | | | — | | | (431) | | | — | | | (9,945) | | | — | | | (9,945) |
Add other income – gains from financial instruments | | | 839 | | | — | | | — | | | 65,184 | | | — | | | 66,023 | | | — | | | 66,023 |
Add foreign currency gains/(losses) | | | 7,797 | | | (79,143) | | | 908 | | | (8,868) | | | (1,010) | | | (80,316) | | | (2,964) | | | (83,280) |
Less share of loss of associate, net of tax | | | (2,114) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (2,114) | | | — | | | (2,114) |
Segment profit/(loss) for the period before tax | | | (1,080) | | | 393,548 | | | 454,649 | | | 45,011 | | | (1,774) | | | 890,354 | | | (60,447) | | | 829,907 |
Income tax (expense)/benefit | | | (3,679) | | | (158,810) | | | (130,879) | | | (27,976) | | | — | | | (321,344) | | | 16,012 | | | (305,332) |
Total profit/(loss) for the year – continuing operations | | | (4,759) | | | 234,738 | | | 323,770 | | | 17,035 | | | (1,774) | | | 569,010 | | | (44,435) | | | 524,575 |
Discontinued operations(5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (3,278) | |||||||
Total profit for the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 521,297 |
(1) | EBITDAIX - Segment earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, merger costs, gains from financial instruments, foreign |
(2) | EBITIX - Segment earnings before interest, taxes, impairment, gains from financial instruments, foreign currency gains/(losses), business combination acquisition costs, non-cash business combination adjustments, and share of associate’s losses. |
(3) | EBTIX - Segment earnings before taxes, impairment, gains from financial instruments, foreign currency gains/(losses), business combination acquisition costs, non-cash business combination adjustments, and share of associate’s losses. |
(4) | Details of the business combination are included in Note 4. The Mt Cattlin segment includes US$12.4 million related to the realisation of inventory at a value in excess of the cost of production and US$13.4 million related to the amortisation of customer contract assets acquired as part of the business combination. |
(5) | The discontinued operations represent the results of Borax (refer Note 2). |
| | Corporate | | | Olaroz | | | Mt Cattlin | | | Sal De Vida | | | James Bay | | | Total before eliminations | | | Eliminations on consolidation | | | Total Group | |
| | 2022 | | | 2022 | | | 2022 | | | 2022 | | | 2022 | | | 2022 | | | 2022 | | | 2022 | |
| | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | | | US $'000 | |
Revenue | | | — | | | 292,758 | | | 451,925 | | | — | | | — | | | 744,683 | | | — | | | 744,683 |
EBITDAIX(1) | | | (25,505) | | | 220,431 | | | 336,178 | | | (510) | | | (344) | | | 530,250 | | | (18,254) | | | 511,996 |
Less depreciation & amortisation | | | (1,149) | | | (17,717) | | | (30,309) | | | (697) | | | (38) | | | (49,910) | | | — | | | (49,910) |
EBITIX(2) | | | (26,654) | | | 202,714 | | | 305,869 | | | (1,207) | | | (382) | | | 480,340 | | | (18,254) | | | 462,086 |
Less interest income/(costs) | | | 15,454 | | | (24,153) | | | 1,177 | | | 747 | | | (4) | | | (6,779) | | | (7,421) | | | (14,200) |
EBTIX(3) | | | (11,200) | | | 178,561 | | | 307,046 | | | (460) | | | (386) | | | 473,561 | | | (25,675) | | | 447,886 |
Less acquisition costs(4) | | | (12,760) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (12,760) | | | — | | | (12,760) |
Less amortisation of customer contracts due to purchase price allocation(4) | | | — | | | — | | | (13,400) | | | — | | | — | | | (13,400) | | | — | | | (13,400) |
Less inventory adjustment due to purchase price allocation(4) | | | — | | | — | | | (12,367) | | | — | | | — | | | (12,367) | | | — | | | (12,367) |
Add other income – gains from financial instruments | | | 4,547 | | | — | | | — | | | 27,119 | | | — | | | 31,666 | | | — | | | 31,666 |
Add foreign currency gains/(losses) | | | (3,024) | | | (7,481) | | | 1,099 | | | (1,173) | | | (1,310) | | | (11,889) | | | 1,629 | | | (10,260) |
Less share of loss of associate, net of tax | | | (2,951) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (2,951) | | | — | | | (2,951) |
Less impairment/write-downs | | | (244) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (244) | | | — | | | (244) |
Segment profit/(loss) for the year before tax | | | (25,632) | | | 171,080 | | | 282,378 | | | 25,486 | | | (1,696) | | | 451,616 | | | (24,046) | | | 427,570 |
Income tax (expense)/benefit | | | 63,221 | | | (74,935) | | | (84,713) | | | (3,667) | | | (4) | | | (100,098) | | | 7,214 | | | (92,884) |
Total profit/(loss) for the year – continuing operations | | | 37,589 | | | 96,145 | | | 197,665 | | | 21,819 | | | (1,700) | | | 351,518 | | | (16,832) | | | 334,686 |
Discontinued operations(5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,537 | |||||||
Total profit for the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 337,223 |
(1) | EBITDAIX - Segment earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, impairment, gains from financial instruments, foreign currency gains/(losses), business combination acquisition costs, non-cash business combination adjustments, and share of associate’s losses. Includes an elimination of unrealised profits of US$18,247,000 for sales by Olaroz to the equity-accounted associate. |
(2) | EBITIX - Segment earnings before interest, taxes, impairment, gains from financial instruments, foreign currency gains/(losses), business combination acquisition costs, non-cash business combination adjustments, and share of associate’s losses. |
(3) | EBTIX - Segment earnings before taxes, impairment, gains from financial instruments, foreign currency gains/(losses), business combination acquisition costs, non-cash business combination adjustments, and share of associate’s losses. |
(4) | On 25 August 2021, the Group acquired Galaxy Resources Limited. Acquisition-related costs for business combination of US$12.8 million included stamp duty of US$3.9 million and merger facilitation fees of US$5.6 million in 2022. The Mt Cattlin segment includes US$12.4 million related to the realisation of inventory at a value in excess of the cost of production and US$13.4 million related to the amortisation of customer contract assets acquired as part of the business combination. Details of the business combination are included in Note 4. |
(5) | The discontinued operations represent the results of Borax (refer Note 2). |
| | Corporate | | | Olaroz | | | Total underlying | | | Eliminations on consolidation | | | Total Group | |
| | 2021 | | | 2021 | | | 2021 | | | 2021 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | |
Revenue | | | — | | | 66,370 | | | 66,370 | | | — | | | 66,370 |
EBITDAIX(1) | | | (8,058) | | | 11,452 | | | 3,394 | | | — | | | 3,394 |
Less depreciation & amortisation | | | (464) | | | (18,294) | | | (18,758) | | | — | | | (18,758) |
EBITIX(2) | | | (8,522) | | | (6,842) | | | (15,364) | | | — | | | (15,364) |
Less interest income/(costs) | | | 14,685 | | | (29,739) | | | (15,054) | | | (6,008) | | | (21,062) |
EBTIX(3) | | | 6,163 | | | (36,581) | | | (30,418) | | | (6,008) | | | (36,426) |
Less acquisition costs(4) | | | (1,243) | | | — | | | (1,243) | | | — | | | (1,243) |
Add other income – gains from financial instruments | | | 1,725 | | | — | | | 1,725 | | | — | | | 1,725 |
Add realisation of inventory write-downs | | | — | | | 18,138 | | | 18,138 | | | — | | | 18,138 |
Add foreign currency gains/(losses) | | | 327 | | | (3,946) | | | (3,619) | | | — | | | (3,619) |
Less share of loss of associate, net of tax | | | (1,682) | | | — | | | (1,682) | | | — | | | (1,682) |
Segment loss for the year before tax | | | 5,290 | | | (22,389) | | | (17,099) | | | (6,008) | | | (23,107) |
Income tax expense | | | — | | | (67,940) | | | (67,940) | | | — | | | (67,940) |
Total loss for the year – continuing operations | | | 5,290 | | | (90,329) | | | (85,039) | | | (6,008) | | | (91,047) |
Discontinued operations(5) | | | | | | | | | | | 1,573 | ||||
Total loss for the year | | | | | | | | | | | (89,474) |
(1) | EBITDAIX - Segment earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation, impairment, rehabilitation provision remeasurement, realisation of inventory write-downs, gains from financial instruments, foreign currency gains/(losses), and share of associate’s losses. |
(2) | EBITIX - Segment earnings before interest, taxes, impairment, rehabilitation provision remeasurement, realisation of inventory write-downs, gains from financial instruments, foreign currency gains/(losses), and share of associate’s losses. |
(3) | EBTIX - Segment earnings before taxes, impairment, rehabilitation provision remeasurement, realisation of inventory write-downs, gains from financial instruments, foreign currency gains/(losses), and share of associate’s losses. |
(4) | Details of the business combination are included in Note 4. |
(5) | The discontinued operations represent the results of Borax (refer Note 2). |
| | Corporate | | | Borax1 | | | Olaroz | | | Mt Cattlin | | | Sal De Vida | | | James Bay | | | Eliminations on consolidation | | | Total Group | |
| | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | |
2023 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Segment assets | | | 1,486,800 | | | — | | | 1,696,269 | | | 737,865 | | | 2,018,808 | | | 393,541 | | | (1,116,090) | | | 5,217,193 |
Segment liabilities | | | (233,886) | | | — | | | (1,161,138) | | | (361,029) | | | (567,634) | | | (88,149) | | | 768,394 | | | (1,643,442) |
Other disclosures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Investment in associate | | | 4,017 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4,017 |
Additions to property plant and equipment, exploration and evaluation assets | | | 2,150 | | | — | | | 266,452 | | | 97,418 | | | 135,508 | | | 80,028 | | | (13,130) | | | 568,426 |
2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Segment assets | | | 1,362,782 | | | 18,921 | | | 1,309,031 | | | 460,650 | | | 1,980,697 | | | 473,159 | | | (1,112,509) | | | 4,492,731 |
Segment liabilities | | | (120,104) | | | (12,147) | | | (1,020,864) | | | (457,864) | | | (469,403) | | | (147,850) | | | 816,867 | | | (1,411,365) |
Other disclosures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Investment in associate | | | 890 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 890 |
Additions to property plant and equipment, exploration and evaluation assets | | | 433 | | | 1,634 | | | 160,885 | | | 32,430 | | | 63,740 | | | 2,840 | | | — | | | 261,962 |
| | Corporate | | | Borax1 | | | Olaroz | | | Mt Cattlin | | | Sal De Vida | | | James Bay | | | Eliminations on consolidation | | | Total Group | |
| | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | |
2023 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities | | | (21,399) | | | 516 | | | 453,221 | | | 418,224 | | | (11,320) | | | (29,908) | | | (18,424) | | | 790,910 |
Cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities | | | (52,090) | | | (15,929)2 | | | (241,292) | | | (85,644) | | | (78,873) | | | (73,252) | | | 38,766 | | | (508,314) |
Cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities | | | (105,281) | | | 15,060 | | | (42,683) | | | (105,480) | | | 90,232 | | | 102,265 | | | (20,342) | | | (66,229) |
2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities | | | (31,984) | | | (389) | | | 152,604 | | | 320,636 | | | 747 | | | (4) | | | — | | | 441,610 |
Cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities | | | 198,567 | | | (1,233) | | | (140,742) | | | (37,788) | | | (53,065) | | | (2,800) | | | — | | | (37,061) |
Cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities | | | (993) | | | (24) | | | 10,089 | | | (6,100) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,972 |
2021 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities | | | (17,943) | | | 1,792 | | | (2,259) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (18,410) |
Cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities | | | 1,749 | | | 1,766 | | | (95,152) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (91,637) |
Cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities | | | 118,966 | | | (35) | | | 80,023 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 198,954 |
1 | Borax was divested during the financial year 30 June 2023 (refer Note 2). |
2 | Inclusive of (US$14,468,000) cash disposed from disposal of Borax. |
For the year ended 30 June 2023 | | | | | Mt Cattlin | | | Olaroz | | | Total | |
| | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | ||
Type of goods | | | Timing of recognition | | | | | | | |||
Lithium Carbonate | | | A point in time | | | — | | | 579,932 | | | 579,932 |
Spodumene concentrate | | | A point in time | | | 513,695 | | | — | | | 513,695 |
Spodumene concentrate – low grade | | | A point in time | | | 99,738 | | | — | | | 99,738 |
Tantalum | | | A point in time | | | 2,157 | | | — | | | 2,157 |
Other | | | A point in time | | | — | | | 12,279 | | | 12,279 |
Total revenue | | | | | 615,590 | | | 592,211 | | | 1,207,801 | |
Geographical markets | | | | | | | | | ||||
Asia | | | | | 613,433 | | | 544,438 | | | 1,157,871 | |
Europe | | | | | — | | | 33,070 | | | 33,070 | |
South America | | | | | — | | | 625 | | | 625 | |
North America | | | | | — | | | 14,078 | | | 14,078 | |
Australia | | | | | 2,157 | | | — | | | 2,157 | |
Total revenue | | | | | 615,590 | | | 592,211 | | | 1,207,801 |
For the year ended 30 June 2022 | | | | | Mt Cattlin | | | Olaroz | | | Total | |
| | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | ||
Type of goods | | | Timing of recognition | | | | | | | |||
Lithium Carbonate | | | A point in time | | | — | | | 292,758 | | | 292,758 |
Spodumene concentrate | | | A point in time | | | 445,832 | | | — | | | 445,832 |
Tantalum | | | A point in time | | | 6,093 | | | — | | | 6,093 |
Total revenue | | | | | 451,925 | | | 292,758 | | | 744,683 |
For the year ended 30 June 2022 | | | | | Mt Cattlin | | | Olaroz | | | Total | |
| | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | ||
Geographical markets | | | | | | | | | ||||
Asia | | | | | 445,832 | | | 280,634 | | | 726,466 | |
Europe | | | | | — | | | 9,898 | | | 9,898 | |
North America | | | | | — | | | 2,226 | | | 2,226 | |
Australia | | | | | 6,093 | | | — | | | 6,093 | |
Total revenue | | | | | 451,925 | | | 292,758 | | | 744,683 |
For the year ended 30 June 2021 | | | | | | | Olaroz | | | Total | ||
| | | | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | |||
Type of goods | | | Timing of recognition | | | | | | | |||
Lithium Carbonate | | | A point in time | | | | | 66,370 | | | 66,370 | |
Total revenue | | | | | | | 66,370 | | | 66,370 | ||
Geographical markets | | | | | | | | | ||||
Asia | | | | | | | 51,804 | | | 51,804 | ||
Europe | | | | | | | 12,605 | | | 12,605 | ||
North America | | | | | | | 1,961 | | | 1,961 | ||
Total revenue | | | | | | | 66,370 | | | 66,370 |
• | Allkem transferred to Golden Wattle (a group associated with MSR) all of the issued shares in the two Borax holding companies which included US$13.8 million cash for employee and rehabilitation liabilities: and |
• | MSR sold to an Allkem subsidiary 100% ownership of the María Victoria Tenement. |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | |
Revenue | | | 13,278 | | | 25,135 | | | 18,390 |
Other income | | | 322 | | | 367 | | | 7,505 |
Expenses excluding net finance costs | | | (11,377) | | | (23,387) | | | (24,265) |
Finance income, net | | | 248 | | | 422 | | | (57) |
Profit from operations | | | 2,471 | | | 2,537 | | | 1,573 |
Foreign currency translation reserve reclassified to profit or loss on disposal | | | (5,749) | | | — | | | — |
(Loss)/profit from discontinued operations | | | (3,278) | | | 2,537 | | | 1,573 |
Net cash flows of the Borax disposal group | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 |
| | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | |
Operating | | | 516 | | | (389) | | | 1,792 |
Investing | | | (1,461) | | | (1,233) | | | 1,766 |
Financing – provided by Allkem group | | | 15,060 | | | (24) | | | (35) |
Net cash inflow/(outflow) | | | 14,115 | | | (1,646) | | | 3,523 |
| | | | | | ||||
Earnings per share from discontinued operation | | | | | | | |||
Basic earnings per share (US cents per share) | | | (0.51) | | | 0.43 | | | 0.48 |
Diluted earnings per share (US cents per share) | | | (0.51) | | | 0.43 | | | 0.48 |
Cash received from sale of the discontinued operation | | | 200 |
Cash sold as part of discontinued operation | | | (14,468) |
Net cash outflow on disposal of the discontinued operation | | | (14,268) |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | | | US$'000 | |
3a) Other income | | | | | | | |||
Gains from financial instruments | | | 66,023 | | | 31,666 | | | 1,725 |
Total other income | | | 66,023 | | | 31,666 | | | 1,725 |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | ||
| | Note | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
3b) Corporate and administrative expenses | | | | | | | | | ||||
Employee benefit expenses | | | | | (29,257) | | | (19,560) | | | (7,515) | |
Audit fees | | | 26 | | | (436) | | | (447) | | | (243) |
Legal and consulting fees | | | | | (10,006) | | | (5,990) | | | (1,210) | |
Share-based payments | | | 20 | | | (10,768) | | | (5,254) | | | (1,848) |
Travel | | | | | (4,752) | | | (1,172) | | | (163) | |
Insurance | | | | | (1,212) | | | (1,525) | | | (1,033) | |
Office & communication costs | | | | | (5,547) | | | (3,726) | | | (1,261) | |
Listing & investor relations costs | | | | | (916) | | | (1,335) | | | (513) | |
Bank Fees | | | | | (1,716) | | | (956) | | | (616) | |
Environmental monitoring & studies | | | | | (949) | | | (361) | | | (330) | |
Restructuring costsi) | | | | | — | | | — | | | (1,361) | |
Other costs | | | | | (911) | | | (3,183) | | | (775) | |
Total corporate and administrative expenses | | | | | (66,470) | | | (43,509) | | | (16,868) |
i) | There were no restructuring costs during the year ended 30 June 2023 (2022: nil). During the year ended 30 June 2021 the group incurred US$1,361,000 restructuring costs from continuing operations. Included in such costs, there was a termination payment for a supply agreement of US$1,200,000 (Olaroz segment), and fixed costs of US$161,000 (Olaroz segment) which were not allocated to the cost of inventories due to the reduction of production volumes resulting from COVID-19. |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
3c) Selling costs | | | | | | | |||
Export duties | | | (20,445) | | | (9,162) | | | (2,283) |
Mining royalty | | | (47,650) | | | (29,540) | | | (622) |
Dispatching & logistics | | | (21,467) | | | (18,322) | | | (61) |
Total selling costs | | | (89,562) | | | (57,024) | | | (2,966) |
| | | | | | ||||
3d) Foreign currency loss | | | | | | | |||
Total foreign currency loss | | | (83,280) | | | (10,260) | | | (3,619) |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
3e) Finance income | | | | | | | |||
Interest income on loans receivable | | | 23 | | | 46 | | | 118 |
Interest income from short term deposits | | | 72,288 | | | 5,934 | | | 1,484 |
Total finance income | | | 72,311 | | | 5,980 | | | 1,602 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
3f) Finance costs | | | | | | | |||
Interest expense on external loans and borrowings and other finance costs amortised | | | (4,246) | | | (8,598) | | | (11,744) |
Interest expense on loans and borrowings from related | | | (3,840) | | | (2,543) | | | (2,333) |
Interest expense on lease liabilities | | | (5,597) | | | (4,669) | | | (2,520) |
Other finance costs related to related party loans | | | (2,876) | | | (1,851) | | | (1,730) |
Change in fair value of financial assets and liabilities | | | (6,268) | | | (2,487) | | | (4,277) |
Unwinding of the rehabilitation provision | | | (1,244) | | | (32) | | | (60) |
Total finance costs | | | (24,071) | | | (20,180) | | | (22,664) |
i) | The interest expense to the related party is non-cash and will be paid on repayment of the loans (Note 27). Total interest is US$8,217,000 (2022: US$5,004,000, 2021: US$4,336,000) and US$4,377,000 (2022: US$2,461,000, 2021: US$2,003,000) of this has been capitalised to property, plant and equipment. |
i) | The purchase price allocation is final as at 30 June 2022. |
ii) | Fair value has been determined using a discounted cash flow valuation technique based on forecast timing of receipts and discount rate relevant to the cash flow stream (Level 3). |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
5a) Income tax expense | | | | | | | |||
Current income tax expense | | | (254,585) | | | (44,887) | | | — |
Deferred tax expense | | | (48,831) | | | (47,997) | | | (67,940) |
Amounts under provided in prior years | | | (1,916) | | | — | | | — |
Total income tax expense | | | (305,332) | | | (92,884) | | | (67,940) |
Deferred income tax expense included in income tax expense comprises: | | | | | | | |||
Decrease/(increase) in deferred tax assets | | | 5,984 | | | (68,073) | | | 12,600 |
Decrease in deferred tax liabilities | | | (54,815) | | | (44,603) | | | (80,540) |
Benefit of previously unrecognised tax losses, tax credits or temporary differences | | | — | | | 64,679 | | | — |
| | (48,831) | | | (47,997) | | | (67,940) |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | ||
| | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | ||
5b) Deferred tax assets | | | | | | | |||
Carry forward tax losses | | | | | 2,944 | | | 37,311 | |
Financial liabilities | | | | | 37,631 | | | 32,680 | |
Other non-financial liabilities | | | | | 36,598 | | | 19,444 | |
Total deferred tax assets | | | | | 77,173 | | | 89,435 | |
Set-off of deferred tax liabilities pursuant to set-off provisions | | | | | (74,095) | | | (64,218) | |
Net deferred tax assets | | | | | 3,078 | | | 25,217 |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | ||
| | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | ||
5c) Deferred tax liabilities | | | | | | | |||
Property, plant and equipment | | | | | (796,340) | | | (704,773) | |
Inventories | | | | | (2,773) | | | (18,200) | |
Other financial assets | | | | | (41,452) | | | (17,768) | |
Exploration and evaluation assets | | | | | (82,975) | | | (109,322) | |
Total deferred tax liabilities | | | | | (923,540) | | | (850,063) | |
Set-off of deferred tax liabilities pursuant to set-off provisions | | | | | 74,095 | | | 64,218 | |
Net deferred tax liabilities | | | | | (849,445) | | | (785,845) |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Profit/(loss) before income tax expense from continuing operations | | | 829,907 | | | 427,570 | | | (23,107) |
(Loss)/profit before income tax from discontinued operations | | | (3,278) | | | 2,537 | | | 1,573 |
Tax (expense)/benefit at Australian tax rate of 30% (2022: 30%, 2021: 30%) | | | (247,989) | | | (129,032) | | | 6,460 |
Tax effect of amounts which are (not deductible)/taxable in calculating taxable income: | | | | | | | |||
Share-based payments | | | (3,230) | | | (1,576) | | | (554) |
Share of loss of associates | | | (634) | | | (885) | | | (505) |
Other | | | — | | | — | | | 106 |
Non-deductible expenses | | | (11,925) | | | (4,259) | | | — |
Tax losses and credits for the year not recognised | | | (2,327) | | | (3,111) | | | — |
Previously unrecognised tax losses and temporary differences | | | 4,732 | | | 67,172 | | | 1,513 |
Impact of tax rates applicable outside of Australia | | | (19,859) | | | (9,031) | | | (49,669) |
Foreign exchange and effects of hyperinflation | | | (26,016) | | | (12,162) | | | (25,291) |
Amounts under provided in prior years | | | 1,916 | | | — | | | — |
Income tax expense | | | (305,332) | | | (92,884) | | | (67,940) |
- | When the deferred income tax liability arose from the initial recognition of goodwill or of an asset or liability in a transaction that was not a business combination and that, at the time of the transaction, affected neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss. |
- | In respect of deductible/taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures, when the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Profit/(loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent: | | | | | | | |||
Profit/(loss) for the financial year | | | 521,297 | | | 337,223 | | | (89,474) |
Exclude non-controlling interests | | | (79,586) | | | (31,549) | | | 29,849 |
Net profit used in the calculation of basic and dilutive EPS | | | 441,711 | | | 305,674 | | | (59,625) |
Exclude loss/(profit) from discontinued operations | | | 3,278 | | | (2,537) | | | (1,573) |
Net profit/(loss) used in the calculation of basic and dilutive EPS from continuing operationsi) | | | 444,989 | | | 303,137 | | | (61,198) |
| | No. | | | No. | | | No. | |
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period used in the calculation of basic EPS | | | 637,323,060 | | | 592,546,337 | | | 330,859,370 |
Weighted average number of options and performance rights outstandingii) | | | 3,560,122 | | | 2,892,020 | | | — |
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period used in the calculation of dilutive EPS | | | 640,883,182 | | | 595,438,357 | | | 330,859,370 |
i) | Basis and dilutive EPS related to discontinued operations is detailed in Note 2. |
ii) | Weighted average performance rights outstanding for 2021 that may be issued in the future and potentially dilute the earnings per share that have not been considered in the calculation due to anti-dilutive effect: 2,533,348. |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Current trade and other receivables | | | | | ||
Trade receivables | | | 77,919 | | | 43,915 |
Interest receivable | | | 18,161 | | | 558 |
Other receivables | | | 2,953 | | | 16,810 |
Receivable from joint venture partyiii) | | | 2,016 | | | — |
VAT tax credits & other tax receivablei) | | | 41,866 | | | 20,521 |
Total current trade and other receivables | | | 142,915 | | | 81,804 |
| | | | |||
Non-current other receivables | | | | | ||
Receivable from joint venture partyiii) | | | 6,134 | | | 6,555 |
Receivable from associate | | | 31,934 | | | 16,463 |
Other receivables | | | 1,216 | | | 1,911 |
VAT tax creditsii) | | | 3,440 | | | 24,312 |
Total non-current other receivables | | | 42,724 | | | 49,241 |
i) | Trade receivables are net of provisional price adjustments (US$43,002,000) (2022: nil, 2021: nil). See Note 1 for further details. |
ii) | The Group has a total of US$41,713,000 (2022: US$32,399,000, 2021: US$24,471,000) of current and non-current Value Added Tax (VAT) recoveries due from the Argentina revenue authority. The Group records VAT at fair value due to the hyperinflationary economy in Argentina and the highly devaluing local currency. Fair value has been determined using a discounted cash flow valuation technique based on the forecast timing of recovery of VAT, and interest rate and exchange rate relevant for that time period (Level 3). The gains and losses are recognised within finance costs in the income statement as a change in fair value of financial assets and liabilities (refer Note 3f). |
iii) | Fair value has been determined using a discounted cash flow valuation technique based on forecast timing of receipts and discount rate relevant to the cash flow stream (Level 3). The gains and losses are recognised within finance costs in the income statement as a change in fair value of financial assets and liabilities (refer Note 3f). |
iv) | Receivable from associate are denominated in JPY and collectable between 2025 to 2028. |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Prepayments to suppliers | | | 30,569 | | | 9,881 |
Prepayments to tax authorities | | | 310 | | | 417 |
Total current prepayments | | | 30,879 | | | 10,298 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Current | | | | | ||
Finished products | | | 29,891 | | | 28,449 |
Work in progress | | | 68,813 | | | 25,711 |
Materials and spare parts | | | 27,770 | | | 22,081 |
Total current | | | 126,474 | | | 76,241 |
Non-current | | | | | ||
Work in progress | | | 86,665 | | | 51,894 |
Materials and spare parts | | | — | | | 1,508 |
Total non-current | | | 86,665 | | | 53,402 |
- | Labour costs, materials and contractor expenses which are directly attributable to the processing of commodities ready-for-sale (lithium carbonate, spodumene concentrate and other products). |
- | The depreciation of mining properties and leases and of property, plant and equipment used in the extraction and processing of brine, production of lithium carbonate and production of spodumene concentrate. |
- | Production overheads. |
| | Land & buildings | | | Plant & equipment | | | Mine properties | | | Leased Plant & Equipment(1) | | | Deferred stripping | | | Work in progress | | | Total | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Cost | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||
As at 1 July 2021 | | | 7,212 | | | 457,237 | | | 247,322 | | | 34,538 | | | 138 | | | 243,398 | | | 989,845 |
Additions – purchases | | | 9,785 | | | 99,268 | | | 74,839 | | | — | | | 25,439 | | | 29,388 | | | 238,719 |
Capitalised interest | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5,904 | | | 5,904 |
Leases - additions/modifications | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,736 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,736 |
Acquisition of a subsidiary (Note 4) | | | — | | | 101,095 | | | 1,360,712 | | | 13,069 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,474,876 |
Remeasurement of rehabilitation provision | | | — | | | — | | | 4,955 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4,955 |
Internal transfers | | | — | | | 5,915 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (5,915) | | | — |
Exchange differences | | | (59) | | | — | | | — | | | (6) | | | — | | | (264) | | | (329) |
As at 30 June 2022 | | | 16,938 | | | 663,515 | | | 1,687,828 | | | 50,337 | | | 25,577 | | | 272,511 | | | 2,716,706 |
Additions - purchases | | | 624 | | | 10,128 | | | 68,012 | | | — | | | 69,857 | | | 334,465 | | | 483,086 |
Capitalised interest | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 10,783 | | | 10,783 |
Leases - additions/modifications | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 14,496 | | | — | | | — | | | 14,496 |
Remeasurement of rehabilitation provision | | | — | | | (4,068) | | | 1,528 | | | — | | | — | | | (188) | | | (2,728) |
Divestment of subsidiary | | | (1,139) | | | (2,698) | | | — | | | (37) | | | — | | | (2,507) | | | (6,381) |
Disposals | | | — | | | (42) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (241) | | | (283) |
Internal transfers | | | — | | | 138,578 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (138,578) | | | — |
Exchange differences | | | (198) | | | (2,373) | | | (4,727) | | | (1) | | | (1,779) | | | 1,501 | | | (7,577) |
As at 30 June 2023 | | | 16,225 | | | 803,040 | | | 1,752,641 | | | 64,795 | | | 93,655 | | | 477,746 | | | 3,208,102 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Accumulated depreciation/ impairment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||
As at 1 July 2021 | | | (6,946) | | | (93,173) | | | (3,892) | | | (6,483) | | | (138) | | | (128) | | | (110,760) |
Depreciation expense | | | (699) | | | (26,811) | | | (13,932) | | | (6,221) | | | (2,006) | | | — | | | (49,669) |
Depreciation capitalised to inventory | | | — | | | (28) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (28) |
Exchange differences | | | 826 | | | 218 | | | — | | | 520 | | | 69 | | | — | | | 1,633 |
As at 30 June 2022 | | | (6,819) | | | (119,794) | | | (17,824) | | | (12,184) | | | (2,075) | | | (128) | | | (158,824) |
Depreciation expense | | | (441) | | | (16,866) | | | (11,251) | | | (11,780) | | | (58,143) | | | — | | | (98,481) |
Depreciation capitalised to inventory | | | — | | | (14,921) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (14,921) |
Divestment of subsidiary | | | 1,128 | | | 337 | | | — | | | 25 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,490 |
Disposals | | | — | | | 42 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 42 |
Exchange differences | | | 121 | | | 1,836 | | | 3,322 | | | 9 | | | 756 | | | — | | | 6,044 |
As at 30 June 2023 | | | (6,011) | | | (149,366) | | | (25,753) | | | (23,930) | | | (59,462) | | | (128) | | | (264,650) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||
Net Book Value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||
As at 30 June 2022 | | | 10,119 | | | 543,721 | | | 1,670,004 | | | 38,153 | | | 23,502 | | | 272,383 | | | 2,557,882 |
As at 30 June 2023 | | | 10,214 | | | 653,674 | | | 1,726,888 | | | 40,865 | | | 34,193 | | | 477,618 | | | 2,943,452 |
- | Buildings and infrastructure: 20 to 30 years |
- | Plant: 5 to 40 years |
- | Leased plant and equipment: lease period – 1 to 10 years |
- | Mining extraction equipment: Units of production |
- | Mine properties: Units of production |
| | Goodwill | | | Software | | | Total | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
At cost | | | 519,817 | | | 2,412 | | | 522,229 |
Accumulated depreciation | | | — | | | (1,742) | | | (1,742) |
As at 30 June 2023 | | | 519,817 | | | 670 | | | 520,487 |
At cost | | | 524,017 | | | 2,432 | | | 526,449 |
Accumulated depreciation | | | — | | | (1,437) | | | (1,437) |
As at 30 June 2022 | | | 524,017 | | | 995 | | | 525,012 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Balance at beginning of year | | | 525,012 | | | 727 |
Goodwill - acquired as part of business combination (Note 4) | | | — | | | 524,017 |
Software - additions | | | — | | | 544 |
Software - disposals | | | (20) | | | — |
Software - amortisation expense | | | (305) | | | (276) |
Goodwill – exchange differences | | | (4,200) | | | — |
Balance at the end of year | | | 520,487 | | | 525,012 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Balance at beginning of year | | | 424,961 | | | 45,867 |
Acquired as part of business combinationi) | | | — | | | 356,395 |
Acquired in exchange for Borax operationii) | | | 19,964 | | | — |
Capitalised exploration expenditure | | | 40,097 | | | 22,699 |
Exchange differences | | | (17,465) | | | — |
Balance at the end of year | | | 467,557 | | | 424,961 |
i) | On 25 August 2021, the Group acquired Galaxy Resources Limited. |
ii) | The María Victoria property was acquired in exchange for the Borax operation. Refer Note 2. |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Lease liabilities | | | | | ||
Balance at the beginning of the year | | | 48,419 | | | 35,685 |
Recognised as part of business combinationi) | | | — | | | 15,635 |
Additions/modifications | | | 14,496 | | | 6,512 |
Accretion of interest - expense | | | 5,597 | | | 4,702 |
Lease payments | | | (14,917) | | | (14,420) |
Exchange differences | | | (350) | | | 305 |
Balance at the end of the year | | | 53,245 | | | 48,419 |
i) | On 25 August 2021, the Group acquired Galaxy Resources Limited. |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Lease liabilities are due as follows: | | | | | ||
Not later than 1 year | | | 13,329 | | | 10,197 |
Total current | | | 13,329 | | | 10,197 |
Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years | | | 18,227 | | | 17,167 |
Later than 5 years | | | 21,690 | | | 21,055 |
Total non-current | | | 39,917 | | | 38,222 |
Balance at 30 June | | | 53,246 | | | 48,419 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Right of use assets – included in property, plant, and equipment (Note 10) | | | | | ||
Land and buildings | | | 2,555 | | | 2,127 |
Plant and equipment | | | 38,310 | | | 36,026 |
Carrying amount of right of use assets at 30 June | | | 40,865 | | | 38,153 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Amounts recognised in the statement of profit or loss: | | | | | | | |||
Depreciation charge for right of use assets | | | | | | | |||
Land and buildings | | | (812) | | | (384) | | | (310) |
Plant and equipment | | | (10,968) | | | (5,887) | | | (1,746) |
Total depreciation charge | | | (11,780) | | | (6,271) | | | (2,056) |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | ||
| | Note | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Current | | | | | | | |||
Trade payables and accrued expensesi) | | | | | 127,509 | | | 93,859 | |
Advance payments from customers | | | | | 3,899 | | | 403 | |
Interest payable | | | | | 1,554 | | | 2,181 | |
Interest payable to a related party | | | 27 | | | 4,392 | | | |
Total current | | | | | 137,354 | | | 96,443 | |
Non-current | | | | | | | |||
Other payables and accrued expenses | | | | | 12,364 | | | 13,477 | |
Interest payable to a related party | | | 27 | | | 16,658 | | | 17,496 |
Total non-current | | | | | 29,022 | | | 30,973 |
i) | The amounts are unsecured and non-interest bearing and generally on 30 to 60 day terms. The carrying amounts approximate fair value. |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | ||
| | Note | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Current | | | | | | | |||
Employee benefits | | | 15a | | | 4,075 | | | 3,843 |
Provision for rehabilitation | | | 15b | | | 9,795 | | | 10,454 |
Total current | | | | | 13,870 | | | 14,297 | |
Non-current | | | | | | | |||
Employee benefits | | | 15a | | | 553 | | | 419 |
Provision for rehabilitation | | | 15b | | | 46,903 | | | 58,732 |
Other provisions | | | | | — | | | 199 | |
Total non-current | | | | | 47,456 | | | 59,350 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Annual leave | | | 4,075 | | | 3,334 |
Long service leave | | | 553 | | | 419 |
Borax Argentina S.A. defined benefit pension plan | | | — | | | 509 |
Total | | | 4,628 | | | 4,262 |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | ||
| | Note | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Balance at the beginning of year | | | | | 69,186 | | | 33,934 | |
Recognised as part of business combinationi) | | | | | — | | | 30,297 | |
Additions reflected in property, plant and equipment | | | 10 | | | 1,528 | | | 6,257 |
Changes in assumptions reflected in property, plant and equipment | | | 10 | | | (4,256) | | | (1,334) |
Divestment of subsidiaryii) | | | | | (6,311) | | | — | |
Expenditure on rehabilitations activities | | | | | (4,261) | | | — | |
Foreign currency translation movement | | | | | (432) | | | — | |
Unwinding of the rehabilitation provision | | | | | 1,244 | | | 32 | |
Balance at the end of year | | | | | 56,698 | | | 69,186 |
i) | On 25 August 2021, the Group acquired Galaxy Resources Limited. |
ii) | Divested as part of the Borax discontinued operation (refer Note 2). |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | ||
Issued capital | | | Note | | | No. shares | | | No. shares | | | No. shares | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 |
Balance at the beginning of year | | | | | 637,657,586 | | | 344,158,072 | | | 277,092,327 | | | 2,686,134 | | | 668,512 | | | 548,462 | |
Performance rights exercisedi) | | | 19 | | | — | | | 900,942 | | | 114,516 | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Shares issued, net of transactions costsii) | | | | | — | | | 292,598,572 | | | 66,951,229 | | | — | | | 2,017,622 | | | 120,050 | |
Balance at the end of year | | | | | 637,657,586 | | | 637,657,586 | | | 344,158,072 | | | 2,686,134 | | | 2,686,134 | | | 668,512 | |
Treasury shares | | | Note | | | No. shares | | | No. shares | | | No. shares | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 |
Balance at the beginning of year | | | | | 500 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Treasury shares acquired | | | 19 | | | 1,818,326 | | | 500 | | | — | | | 17,939 | | | — | | | — |
Performance rights exercisedi) | | | | | (1,584,104) | | | — | | | — | | | (15,628) | | | — | | | — | |
Balance at the end of year | | | | | 234,722 | | | 500 | | | — | | | 2,311 | | | — | | | — |
i) | Represents performance rights exercised under the Company’s share-based payments plans and executive service agreements. Refer to Note 19 for share-based payments. |
ii) | Transaction costs (net of tax) for the shares issued in 2022 were US$446,000 (2021: US$3,706,000). 292,598,572 ordinary shares were issued on 25 August 2021 at a price of US$6.90 (AU$9.52) per share as a result of the Galaxy Resources Ltd business combination (refer Note 4). |
| | Share- based payments | | | Cashflow hedge | | | Foreign currency translation | | | Other | | | Total | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Balance as at 1 July 2020 | | | 7,829 | | | (2,362) | | | (35,453) | | | 13,378 | | | (16,608) |
Foreign currency translation differences | | | — | | | — | | | 1,412 | | | — | | | 1,412 |
Cashflow hedge through other comprehensive income | | | — | | | 1,436 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,436 |
Other comprehensive income | | | — | | | 1,436 | | | 1,412 | | | — | | | 2,848 |
Share-based payments | | | 1,902 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,902 |
Other movements | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (806) | | | (806) |
Balance as at 30 June 2021 | | | 9,731 | | | (926) | | | (34,041) | | | 12,572 | | | (12,664) |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2021 | | | 9,731 | | | (926) | | | (34,041) | | | 12,572 | | | (12,664) |
Foreign currency translation differences | | | — | | | — | | | (2,851) | | | — | | | (2,851) |
Cashflow hedge through other comprehensive income | | | — | | | 1,959 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,959 |
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (5,985) | | | (5,985) |
Other comprehensive income/(loss) | | | — | | | 1,959 | | | (2,851) | | | (5,985) | | | (6,877) |
Share-based payments | | | 5,427 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5,427 |
Balance as at 30 June 2022 | | | 15,158 | | | 1,033 | | | (36,892) | | | 6,587 | | | (14,114) |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Balance as at 1 July 2022 | | | 15,158 | | | 1,033 | | | (36,892) | | | 6,587 | | | (14,114) |
Reclassification to income statementi) | | | — | | | — | | | 5,749 | | | — | | | 5,749 |
Foreign currency translation differences | | | — | | | — | | | (25,498) | | | — | | | (25,498) |
Cashflow hedge through other comprehensive income | | | — | | | 672 | | | — | | | — | | | 672 |
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (424) | | | (424) |
Other comprehensive income/(loss) | | | — | | | 672 | | | (19,749) | | | (424) | | | (19,501) |
Issue of treasury shares for share-based payments | | | (15,628) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (15,628) |
Share-based payments | | | 11,048 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 11,048 |
Transfer of retained earnings to legal and discretionary reserve | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 32,405 | | | 32,405 |
Balance as at 30 June 2023 | | | 10,578 | | | 1,705 | | | (56,641) | | | 38,568 | | | (5,790) |
i) | Foreign currency translation reserve related to the Borax discontinued operation (refer Note 2). |
ii) | The transfer of retained earnings to the legal and discretionary reserve was completed in accordance with local Argentinean corporate law. |
| | | | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | |||
| | Interest rate | | | Maturity | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Current | | | | | | | | | ||||
Loans & borrowings - project loan (a) | | | SOFR + 0.80% | | | 2023-2024 | | | (37,382) | | | (37,574) |
Related party loans (c) | | | | | | | (5,137) | | | — | ||
Total current debt | | | | | | | (42,519) | | | (37,574) | ||
| | | | | | | | |||||
Non-current | | | | | | | | | ||||
Loans & borrowings - project loan (a) | | | 2.51% - 2.61% | | | 2024-2029 | | | (152,840) | | | (189,327) |
Related party loans (c) | | | | | | | (78,916) | | | (84,776) | ||
Total non-current debt | | | | | | | (231,756) | | | (274,103) | ||
| | | | | | | | |||||
Total debt | | | | | | | (274,275) | | | (311,677) | ||
| | | | | | | | |||||
Cash at bank and on hand | | | | | | | 81,459 | | | 142,668 | ||
Short term deposits (d) | | | | | | | 739,970 | | | 520,870 | ||
Total cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | 821,429 | | | 663,538 | ||
Financial assets - non-current (e) | | | | | | | 21,372 | | | 16,356 | ||
Total cash and financial assets | | | | | | | 842,801 | | | 679,894 | ||
| | | | | | | | |||||
Net cash/(debt) | | | | | | | 568,526 | | | 368,217 | ||
| | | | | | | | |||||
Equity | | | | | | | (3,573,751) | | | (3,081,366) | ||
Capital and net cash | | | | | | | (3,005,225) | | | (2,713,149) | ||
| | | | | | | | |||||
Cash ratio | | | | | | | 19% | | | 14% |
- | US$39.5 million (2022: US$50.1 million) bears interest at SOFR + 6% (2022: LIBOR + 6%) per annum and will be payable prior to July 2028. |
- | US$39.1 million (2022: US$34.4 million) bears interest at SOFR + 6% (2022: LIBOR + 6%) per annum and will be payable prior to July 2030. |
- | US$273,000 (2022: US$273,000) bears interest at SOFR + 0.75% (2022: LIBOR + 0.75%) per annum and will be payable prior to July 2029. |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Effect on profit after tax and equity as a result of a: | | | | | ||
1% +/- reasonably possible change in interest rates | | | (4,007) | | | (2,781) |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Effect on profit after tax and equity as a result of a: | | | | | ||
50% +/- reasonably possible change in US$ (vs ARS) | | | (20,014) | | | (13,490) |
10% +/- reasonably possible change in US$ (vs AU$) | | | 1,410 | | | 1,694 |
• | development and commercial acceptance of lithium-based applications and technologies, and/or |
• | the introduction of new technologies that may not be based on lithium, |
• | forward selling by producers, |
• | the cost of production, |
• | new mine developments and mine closures, |
• | advances in various production technologies for such minerals and general global economic conditions. |
| | Notional amount | | | Carrying amount assets/(liability) | | | Change in fair value used for measuring ineffectiveness | ||||||||||
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
Cash Flow Hedges Interest Rate Risk | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 |
Interest Rate Swaps | | | 25,425 | | | 42,585 | | | 163 | | | (1,422) | | | (1,585) | | | (3,948) |
| | Cash flow hedge reserve | | | Change in fair value used for measuring ineffectiveness | |||||||
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
Cash Flow Hedge (before tax) | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 |
Forecast floating interest payments | | | 1,705 | | | 1,033 | | | (1,585) | | | (3,948) |
| | Within 12 months | | | 1 to 5 years | | | Over 5 years | | | Total | | | Carrying amount | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Payables | | | 137,352 | | | 29,022 | | | — | | | 166,374 | | | 166,374 |
Loans and borrowings | | | 51,403 | | | 237,549 | | | 60,172 | | | 349,124 | | | 274,275 |
Lease liabilities | | | 13,329 | | | 18,227 | | | 21,690 | | | 53,246 | | | 53,246 |
Total as at 30 June 2023 | | | 202,084 | | | 284,798 | | | 81,862 | | | 568,744 | | | 493,895 |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Payables | | | 96,443 | | | 30,973 | | | — | | | 127,416 | | | 127,416 |
Loans and borrowings | | | 43,698 | | | 150,806 | | | 295,602 | | | 490,106 | | | 311,677 |
Lease liabilities | | | 14,270 | | | 27,968 | | | 29,936 | | | 72,174 | | | 48,419 |
Derivatives - Interest Rate Swap | | | 1,086 | | | 336 | | | — | | | 1,422 | | | 1,422 |
Total as at 30 June 2022 | | | 155,497 | | | 210,083 | | | 325,538 | | | 691,118 | | | 488,934 |
Financial assets | | | | | Carrying Amount | | | Fair Value | |||||||
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | ||
| | Note | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 17 | | | 821,429 | | | 663,538 | | | 821,429 | | | 663,538 |
Financial assets - non-current | | | 17 | | | 21,372 | | | 16,356 | | | 21,372 | | | 16,356 |
Financial assets at FVOCI | | | | | 3,474 | | | 4,048 | | | 3,474 | | | 4,048 | |
Financial assets at amortised cost: | | | | | | | | | | | |||||
Trade and other receivables - current | | | 7 | | | 99,033 | | | 61,283 | | | 99,033 | | | 61,283 |
Trade and other receivables - non-current | | | 7 | | | 1,216 | | | 1,911 | | | 1,216 | | | 1,911 |
Financial assets at fair value: | | | | | | | | | | | |||||
VAT tax credits & other tax receivable - current | | | 7 | | | 41,866 | | | 20,521 | | | 41,866 | | | 20,521 |
Receivable from a joint venture party - current | | | 7 | | | 2,016 | | | — | | | 2,016 | | | — |
Receivable from a joint venture party - non-current | | | 7 | | | 6,134 | | | 6,555 | | | 6,134 | | | 6,555 |
Receivable from associate | | | 7 | | | 31,934 | | | 16,463 | | | 31,934 | | | 16,463 |
VAT tax credits | | | 7 | | | 3,440 | | | 24,312 | | | 3,440 | | | 24,312 |
Total financial assets | | | | | 1,031,914 | | | 814,987 | | | 1,031,914 | | | 814,987 |
Financial liabilities | | | | | Carrying Amount | | | Fair Value | |||||||
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | ||
| | Note | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Financial liabilities at amortised cost: | | | | | | | | | | | |||||
Trade and other payables - current | | | 14 | | | 137,354 | | | 96,443 | | | 137,354 | | | 96,443 |
Trade and other payables - non-current | | | 14 | | | 29,022 | | | 30,973 | | | 29,022 | | | 30,973 |
Loans and borrowings - current | | | 17 | | | 42,519 | | | 37,574 | | | 42,047 | | | 37,574 |
Loans and borrowings - non-current | | | 17 | | | 231,756 | | | 274,103 | | | 225,915 | | | 274,103 |
Financial liabilities at fair value: | | | | | | | | | | | |||||
Derivatives - interest rate swap | | | 18 | | | — | | | 1,422 | | | — | | | 1,422 |
Total financial liabilities | | | | | 440,651 | | | 440,515 | | | 434,338 | | | 440,515 |
| | | | 1 July 2022 | | | Business Combination | | | Net Cash Flow | | | Other | | | 30 June 2023 | ||
| | Note | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Financial liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Current | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Loans and borrowings | | | 17 | | | 37,574 | | | — | | | — | | | 4,945 | | | 42,519 |
Lease liabilities | | | 13 | | | 10,197 | | | — | | | (9,320) | | | 12,452 | | | 13,329 |
Non-current | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Loans and borrowings | | | 17 | | | 274,103 | | | — | | | (37,402) | | | (4,945) | | | 231,756 |
Lease liabilities | | | 13 | | | 38,222 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,695 | | | 39,917 |
Total financial liabilities arising from financing activities | | | | | 360,096 | | | — | | | (46,722) | | | 14,147 | | | 327,521 |
| | | | 1 July 2021 | | | Business Combination | | | Net Cash Flow | | | Other | | | 30 June 2022 | ||
| | Note | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Financial liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Current | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Loans and borrowings | | | 17 | | | 34,683 | | | — | | | 2,880 | | | 11 | | | 37,574 |
Lease liabilities | | | 13 | | | 2,562 | | | 15,635 | | | (9,413) | | | 1,413 | | | 10,197 |
Non-current | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
Loans and borrowings | | | 17 | | | 266,278 | | | — | | | 8,247 | | | (422) | | | 274,103 |
Lease liabilities | | | 13 | | | 33,123 | | | — | | | — | | | 5,099 | | | 38,222 |
Total financial liabilities arising from financing activities | | | | | 336,646 | | | 15,635 | | | 1,714 | | | 6,101 | | | 360,096 |
TSR performance condition (absolute, 50%) | | | Proportion of PROP which vest |
If TSR falls below 7.5% return per annum | | | None of the performance rights vest |
If TSR lies between 7.5% and 10% return per annum | | | 50% of the performance rights vest |
If TSR lies between 10% and 12.5% return per annum | | | 75% of the performance rights vest |
If TSR lies at or above the 12.5% return per annum | | | 100% the performance rights vest |
TSR performance condition (relative, 50%)1 | | | Proportion of PROP which vest |
Less than 50th percentile | | | None of the performance rights vest |
Equal to or greater than 50th percentile | | | 50% of the performance rights vest |
Greater than 75th percentile | | | 100% of the performance rights vest |
1 | TSR performance condition over the measurement period relative to the constituent companies of the ASX 300 Resources Index subject to the thresholds. |
Performance Condition - Relative TSR | | | Proportion of Relative TSR Awards vesting |
If Relative TSR below 50th percentile | | | Nil |
If Relative TSR at the 50th percentile | | | 50% |
If Relative TSR between 50th and 75th Percentile | | | Straight-line pro-rata between 50% and 75% |
If Relative TSR above 75th percentile | | | 100% |
Performance conditions for 2022-PROP Measurement date: 30 June 2024 | | | | | ||
Achievement (tonnes) | | | % of Base | | | % of Bonus PCPR to vest |
100,000 or more | | | 100% | | | 100% |
95,000 to 99,999 | | | 100% | | | 80% |
90,000 to 94,999 | | | 100% | | | 60% |
85,000 to 89,999 | | | 100% | | | 40% |
80,000 to 84,999 | | | 100% | | | 20% |
75,000 to 79,999 | | | 100% | | | 0% |
56,250 to 74,999 | | | Pro-rata straight line vesting 75% to 99% | | | 0% |
Less than 56,250 | | | Nil | | | 0% |
1. | The performance rights held by Mr Kaplan (formerly CFO, deceased 10 February 2023) are deemed to have vested for accounting purposes. |
| | Exercise price (AU$) | | | 1 July 2022 No. | | | Vested No | | | Exercised No. | | | 30 June 2023 No. | |||||||
Total performance rights – vested and not exercised | | | — | | | — | | | 2,061,531 | | | (1,584,104) | | | 477,427 |
PR Grant | | | 2021 - PROP | | | 2022 - LTI | ||||||||||||
Grant date | | | 13-Nov-20 | | | 13-Nov-20 | | | 17-Dec-20 | | | 17-Dec-20 | | | 30-Nov-21 | | | 30-Nov-21 |
Number issued | | | 114,325 | | | 114,324 | | | 538,154 | | | 538,154 | | | 89,122 | | | 133,684 |
Fair value at grant date (AU$) | | | 1.79 | | | 2.20 | | | 3.25 | | | 3.60 | | | 7.73 | | | 10.22 |
Share price (AU$) | | | 2.97 | | | 2.97 | | | 4.31 | | | 4.31 | | | 10.22 | | | 10.22 |
Exercise price (AU$) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | — | | | — | |
Expected volatility | | | 52% | | | 52% | | | 53% | | | 53% | | | 54% | | | 54% |
Right's life | | | 3 years | | | 3 years | | | 3 years | | | 3 years | | | 2.8 years | | | 2.8 years |
Expected dividends | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 0.10% | | | 0.10% | | | 0.10% | | | 0.10% | | | 0.81% | | | 0.81% |
PR Grant | | | 2022 - LTI | | | 2022 - Merger Completion | ||||||||||||
Grant date | | | 22-May-22 | | | 22-May-22 | | | 22-May-22 | | | 22-May-22 | | | 10-Nov-21 | | | 30-Nov-21 |
Number issued | | | 229,826 | | | 143,652 | | | 260,812 | | | 65,357 | | | 161,976 | | | 42,097 |
Fair value at grant date (AU$) | | | 13.05 | | | 13.05 | | | 10.81 | | | 13.05 | | | 9.18 | | | 10.22 |
Share price (AU$) | | | 13.05 | | | 13.05 | | | 13.05 | | | 13.05 | | | 9.18 | | | 10.22 |
Exercise price (AU$) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Expected volatility | | | 55% | | | 55% | | | 55% | | | 55% | | | 55% | | | 54% |
Right's life | | | 2.4 years | | | 2.4 years | | | 2.4 years | | | 2.4 years | | | 0.8 years | | | 0.8 years |
Expected dividends | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 2.62% | | | 2.62% | | | 2.62% | | | 2.62% | | | 1.73% | | | 0.81% |
PR Grant | | | 2022 – Merger Completion | | | 2023 - LTI | ||||||||||||||||
Grant date | | | 10-Nov-21 | | | 10-Nov-21 | | | 10-Nov-21 | | | 10-Nov-21 | | | 15-Nov-22 | | | 15-Nov-22 | | |||
Number issued | | | 52,894 | | | 52,894 | | | 115,159 | | | 54,500 | | | 51,969 | | | 77,954 | | |||
Fair value at grant date (AU$) | | | 9.18 | | | 9.18 | | | 9.18 | | | 9.18 | | | 10.71 | | | 14.25 | | |||
Share price (AU$) | | | 9.18 | | | 9.18 | | | 9.18 | | | 9.18 | | | 14.25 | | | 14.25 | | |||
Exercise price (AU$) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | |||
Expected volatility | | | 55% | | | 55% | | | 55% | | | 55% | | | 56% | | | 56% | | |||
Right's life | | | 0.8 years | | | 1.8 years | | | 1.8 years | | | 2.8 years | | | 2.9 years | | | 2.9 years | | |||
Expected dividends | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | |||
Risk-free interest rate | | | 1.73% | | | 1.73% | | | 1.73% | | | 1.73% | | | 3.27% | | | 3.27% | |
PR Grant | | | 2023 - LTI | | | 2023 - STI | |||||||||||||||
Grant date | | | 23-Dec-22 | | | 23-Dec-22 | | | 21-Mar-23 | | | 21-Mar-23 | | | 15-Nov-22 | | | 23-Dec-22 | | | 21-Mar-23 |
Number issued | | | 340,847 | | | 601,448 | | | 18,237 | | | 29,538 | | | 48,189 | | | 313,824 | | | 14,522 |
Fair value at grant date (AU$) | | | 9.06 | | | 13.13 | | | 6.61 | | | 10.28 | | | 14.25 | | | 13.13 | | | 10.28 |
Share price (AU$) | | | 13.13 | | | 13.13 | | | 10.28 | | | 10.28 | | | 14.25 | | | 13.13 | | | 10.28 |
Exercise price (AU$) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Expected volatility | | | 55% | | | 55% | | | 53% | | | 53% | | | 56% | | | 55% | | | 53% |
Right's life | | | 2.7 years | | | 2.7 years | | | 2.5 years | | | 2.5 years | | | 0.8 years | | | 0.7 years | | | 0.8 years |
Expected dividends | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 3.01% | | | 3.01% | | | 2.83% | | | 2.83% | | | 3.27% | | | 3.01% | | | 2.83% |
| | Country of incorporation Principal place of business tax residency | | | % equity interest held by the Group | ||||
Entity Name | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | |||
Borax Argentina Holding No 1 Pty Ltd i) | | | Australia | | | — | | | 100.00 |
Borax Argentina Holding No 2 Pty Ltd i) | | | Australia | | | — | | | 100.00 |
Borax Argentina S.A. i) | | | Argentina | | | — | | | 100.00 |
Sales De Jujuy Pte Ltd | | | Singapore | | | 72.68 | | | 72.68 |
Sales De Jujuy S.A. | | | Argentina | | | 66.50 | | | 66.50 |
Borax Brasil Pelstras E Conferencias Ltda | | | Brazil | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
La Frontera Minerals S.A. | | | Argentina | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Olaroz Lithium S.A. | | | Argentina | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
El Trigal S.A. | | | Argentina | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Los Andes Compañía Minera S.A. | | | Argentina | | | 66.81 | | | 66.81 |
A.C.N. 646 148 754 Pty Ltd | | | Australia | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Advantage Lithium S.A. | | | Argentina | | | 100.00 | | | 85.00 |
Allkem Corporate Services Pty Ltd ii) | | | Australia | | | 100.00 | | | — |
South American Salar Minerals Pty Ltd | | | Australia | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
South American Salar S.A. | | | Argentina | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Galaxy Resources Pty Ltd | | | Australia | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Galaxy Lithium Australia Pty Ltd | | | Australia | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Galaxy Resources International Ltd | | | Hong Kong | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Galaxy Lithium Holdings BV | | | Netherlands | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Galaxy Lithium (CANADA) INC | | | Canada | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Galaxy Lithium ONE INC | | | Canada | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Galaxy Lithium (ONTARIO) INC | | | Canada | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Allkem Financial Services Pty Ltd (formerly General Mining Corporation Pty Ltd) | | | Australia | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
Galaxy Lithium (SAL DE VIDA) S.A. | | | Argentina | | | 100.00 | | | 100.00 |
i) | Entities disposed and presented as discontinued operations (refer Note 2). |
ii) | Incorporated 19 December 2022. |
- | Power over the investee (i.e. existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the relevant activities of the investee), |
- | Exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee, and |
- | The ability to use its power over the investee to affect its returns. |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Revenue | | | 592,211 | | | 292,758 | | | 66,370 |
Cost of sales | | | (50,665) | | | (40,982) | | | (24,950) |
Gross profit | | | 541,546 | | | 251,776 | | | 41,420 |
Corporate and administrative costs | | | (29,039) | | | (15,957) | | | (8,864) |
Selling costs | | | (37,200) | | | (15,384) | | | (2,966) |
Net finance income/(costs) | | | 13,830 | | | (24,153) | | | (29,739) |
Depreciation | | | (16,320) | | | (17,717) | | | (18,294) |
Foreign exchange | | | (79,159) | | | (7,478) | | | (3,947) |
Profit/(loss) before income tax | | | 393,658 | | | 171,087 | | | (22,390) |
Income tax expense/(benefit) | | | (158,810) | | | (74,935) | | | (67,940) |
Profit/(loss) for the year from continuing operations | | | 234,848 | | | 96,152 | | | (90,330) |
Other comprehensive income | | | 672 | | | 1,959 | | | 1,435 |
Total comprehensive profit/(loss) | | | 235,520 | | | 98,111 | | | (88,895) |
| | | | | | ||||
Profit/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interests | | | 79,586 | | | 31,549 | | | (29,371) |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Current assets | | | 321,011 | | | 180,001 |
Non-current assets | | | 1,344,006 | | | 1,117,399 |
Total assets | | | 1,665,017 | | | 1,297,400 |
Current liabilities | | | 231,127 | | | 75,730 |
Non-current liabilities | | | 930,000 | | | 945,131 |
Total labilities | | | 1,161,127 | | | 1,020,861 |
Net assets | | | 503,890 | | | 276,539 |
| | | | |||
Total equity | | | 503,890 | | | 276,539 |
| | | | |||
Attributable to: | | | | | ||
Equity holders of the parent | | | 333,303 | | | 183,747 |
Non-controlling interest | | | 170,587 | | | 92,792 |
Total equity attributable to members | | | 503,890 | | | 276,539 |
Entity Name | | | Country of incorporation & principal place of business | | | % economic interest held by the Group | |||
| 2023 | | | 2022 | |||||
Toyotsu Lithium Corporation (TLC) | | | Japan | | | 75.00 | | | 75.00 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Balance at the beginning of year | | | 890 | | | 4,230 |
Additional capital contribution during the period | | | 5,699 | | | — |
Loss from equity accounted investment in associates | | | (2,114) | | | (2,951) |
Foreign currency translation reserve | | | (458) | | | (389) |
Balance at the end of year | | | 4,017 | | | 890 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Revenue | | | 60,845 | | | — | | | — |
Cost of sales | | | (60,740) | | | — | | | — |
Corporate and administrative expenses | | | (2,833) | | | (3,888) | | | (2,193) |
Loss before income tax | | | (2,728) | | | (3,888) | | | (2,193) |
Income tax expense | | | (90) | | | (47) | | | (50) |
Loss for the period | | | (2,818) | | | (3,935) | | | (2,243) |
Total comprehensive loss | | | (2,818) | | | (3,935) | | | (2,243) |
Allkem's share of the loss for the year | | | (2,114) | | | (2,951) | | | (1,682) |
Allkem's share of total comprehensive loss | | | (2,114) | | | (2,951) | | | (1,682) |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Current assets | | | 114,495 | | | 29,074 |
Non-current assets | | | 49,877 | | | 68,977 |
Total assets | | | 164,372 | | | 98,051 |
Current liabilities | | | 107,935 | | | 50,820 |
Non-current liabilities | | | 51,082 | | | 46,045 |
Total liabilities | | | 159,017 | | | 96,865 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Net assets | | | 5,355 | | | 1,186 |
Contributed equity | | | 16,563 | | | 8,964 |
Reserves | | | (934) | | | (323) |
Accumulated losses | | | (10,274) | | | (7,455) |
Total equity | | | 5,355 | | | 1,186 |
| | | | |||
Allkem's share of total equity | | | 4,017 | | | 890 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Current assets | | | 192,465 | | | 341,875 |
Non-current assets | | | 2,688,066 | | | 2,482,719 |
Total assets | | | 2,880,531 | | | 2,824,594 |
Current liabilities | | | 195,104 | | | 74,195 |
Non-current liabilities | | | 1,222 | | | 3,576 |
Total liabilities | | | 196,326 | | | 77,771 |
Net assets | | | 2,684,205 | | | 2,746,823 |
Contributed equity | | | 2,663,213 | | | 2,665,524 |
Reserves | | | (37,184) | | | (43,978) |
Accumulated profits | | | 58,176 | | | 125,277 |
Total equity | | | 2,684,205 | | | 2,746,823 |
(Loss)/profit for the year | | | (5,923) | | | 52,325 |
Total comprehensive (loss)/income for the year | | | (5,923) | | | 52,325 |
- | Allkem Ltd; |
- | Galaxy Resources Pty Ltd; and |
- | Galaxy Lithium Australia Pty Ltd; |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Revenue | | | 615,589 | | | 451,931 |
Cost of sales | | | (46,983) | | | (74,077) |
Gross profit | | | 568,606 | | | 377,854 |
Other income | | | 7,087 | | | 1,824 |
Corporate and administrative expenses | | | (32,844) | | | (20,066) |
Merger and acquisition costs | | | (9,514) | | | (12,760) |
Selling expenses | | | (52,549) | | | (41,640) |
Depreciation and amortisation expense | | | (78,085) | | | (28,558) |
Foreign currency gain | | | 22,191 | | | 18,884 |
Asset impairment and write down | | | (18,515) | | | — |
Profit before interest and income tax | | | 406,377 | | | 295,538 |
Finance income | | | 49,535 | | | 18,036 |
Finance costs | | | 1,102 | | | (1,390) |
Profit before income tax | | | 457,014 | | | 312,184 |
Income tax expense | | | (116,866) | | | (17,989) |
Profit for the year | | | 340,148 | | | 294,195 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Current assets | | | | | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 638,175 | | | 562,504 |
Trade and other receivables | | | 114,216 | | | 100,532 |
Inventory | | | 41,951 | | | 13,113 |
Prepayments | | | 1,583 | | | 834 |
Total current assets | | | 795,925 | | | 676,983 |
Non-current assets | | | | | ||
Other receivables | | | 306,027 | | | 299,846 |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 90,951 | | | 81,751 |
Financial assets | | | 5,000 | | | — |
Intangible assets | | | 168 | | | 252 |
Exploration and evaluation assets | | | 8,906 | | | 3,065 |
Net deferred tax assets | | | 3,078 | | | 25,217 |
Investments at fair value through other comprehensive income | | | 3,474 | | | 4,048 |
Investment in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures | | | 1,956,161 | | | 2,002,326 |
Other | | | 2,670 | | | 3,841 |
Total non-current assets | | | 2,376,435 | | | 2,420,346 |
Total assets | | | 3,172,360 | | | 3,097,329 |
Current liabilities | | | | | ||
Trade and other payables | | | 42,405 | | | 41,180 |
Provisions | | | 2,326 | | | 1,896 |
Income tax payable | | | 73,405 | | | 40,672 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Lease liabilities | | | 9,651 | | | 7,317 |
Total current liabilities | | | 127,787 | | | 91,065 |
Non-current liabilities | | | | | ||
Other payables | | | — | | | 1,670 |
Loans and borrowings | | | — | | | 723 |
Provisions | | | 12,069 | | | 13,357 |
Lease liabilities | | | 2,227 | | | 1,820 |
Total non-current liabilities | | | 14,296 | | | 17,570 |
Total liabilities | | | 142,083 | | | 108,635 |
Net assets | | | 3,030,277 | | | 2,988,694 |
| | | | |||
Equity | | | | | ||
Issued capital | | | 2,663,213 | | | 2,665,524 |
Reserves | | | (37,183) | | | (43,978) |
Retained earnings | | | 404,247 | | | 367,148 |
Total equity | | | 3,030,277 | | | 2,988,694 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Profit/(loss) after income tax | | | 521,297 | | | 337,223 | | | (89,474) |
| | | | | | ||||
Adjustments for: | | | | | | | |||
Non-cash employee benefits expense | | | 10,768 | | | 5,427 | | | 1,902 |
Depreciation and amortisation | | | 98,786 | | | 63,344 | | | 18,759 |
Impairment loss | | | — | | | 244 | | | 912 |
Foreign currency translation reserve transferred to profit | | | 5,749 | | | — | | | — |
Gain on disposal of assets | | | — | | | — | | | (2,450) |
Gain on financial instruments | | | (66,023) | | | (32,033) | | | (2,711) |
Share of net losses of associates | | | 2,114 | | | 2,951 | | | 1,682 |
Unwinding of discount on rehabilitation provision | | | 1,244 | | | 32 | | | 368 |
FX loss from equity raise | | | — | | | — | | | 700 |
Non-cash finance costs | | | — | | | — | | | 4,719 |
Unrealised foreign exchange | | | 58,476 | | | 5,038 | | | 4,781 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:i) | | | | | | | |||
(Increase) in receivables | | | (44,425) | | | (46,254) | | | (7,136) |
(Increase)/decrease in inventory | | | (74,802) | | | 7,965 | | | (24,430) |
(Increase)/decrease in prepayments | | | (20,587) | | | (5,955) | | | 3,978 |
(Increase)/decrease in payables | | | 39,798 | | | (2,403) | | | 5,016 |
Increase in net deferred tax liabilities | | | 85,889 | | | 48,898 | | | 67,940 |
Increase in income tax payable | | | 131,482 | | | 44,692 | | | — |
(Decrease) in provisions | | | (3,209) | | | (5,806) | | | (2,966) |
Increase in other liabilities | | | 44,353 | | | 18,247 | | | — |
| | | | | | ||||
Net cash provided by /(used in) operating activities | | | 790,910 | | | 441,610 | | | (18,410) |
i) | Net of assets acquired as part of business combination |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$ | | | US$ | | | US$ | |
Audit and review of financial statements | | | | | | | |||
- Australia | | | 287,505 | | | 323,581 | | | 187,986 |
- Argentina | | | 148,405 | | | 177,500 | | | 121,832 |
Other audit services | | | | | | | |||
- Australia | | | 368,647 | | | — | | | — |
Total auditors’ remuneration | | | 804,557 | | | 501,081 | | | 309,818 |
Corporate and administrative expenses | | | 435,910 | | | 446,033 | | | 242,720 |
Acquisition and merger costs | | | 368,647 | | | — | | | — |
Discontinued operations | | | — | | | 55,048 | | | 67,098 |
Total auditors’ remuneration | | | 804,557 | | | 501,081 | | | 309,818 |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | ||
Transactions impacting the statement of profit or loss | | | Note | | | US$ | | | US$ | | | US$ |
Sales to a related party | | | 1 | | | 592,211,349 | | | 292,757,620 | | | 66,370,456 |
Interest expense to a related party (gross of any capitalisation) | | | 3f | | | (8,387,484) | | | (5,009,465) | | | (4,357,875) |
| | | | 2023 | | | 2022 | ||
Transactions impacting the statement of financial position: | | | Note | | | US$ | | | US$ |
Trade and other receivables from a related party | | | | | | | |||
Trade receivables - current | | | 7 | | | 36,716,013 | | | 39,078,658 |
Other receivables - current | | | 7 | | | — | | | 13,869,439 |
Receivables - non-currenti) | | | 7 | | | 31,934,000 | | | 16,462,784 |
Loans payable to a related party | | | | | | | |||
Current | | | 17 | | | 5,137,222 | | | — |
Non-current | | | 17 | | | 78,915,783 | | | 84,776,481 |
Interest payable to a related party | | | | | | | |||
Current | | | 14 | | | 4,392,192 | | | — |
Non-current | | | 14 | | | 16,658,291 | | | 17,495,483 |
i) | Non-current receivable from associate is denominated in Japanese Yen. |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | US$ | | | US$ | | | US$ | |
Short-term employee benefits | | | 2,481,676 | | | 2,544,973 | | | 1,367,716 |
Post-employment benefits | | | 18,928 | | | 20,246 | | | 18,343 |
Other long-term benefits | | | 9,205 | | | 22,903 | | | 6,094 |
Share-based payments | | | 2,106,185 | | | 1,446,613 | | | 513,484 |
Total compensation | | | 4,615,994 | | | 4,034,735 | | | 1,905,637 |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | US$’000 | | | US$’000 | |
Not later than 1 year | | | | | ||
Exploration commitmentsi) | | | 10,657 | | | 1,124 |
Contracts – Property plant and equipmentii) | | | 179,194 | | | 114,919 |
Contracts – Operatingii) | | | 19,059 | | | 7,104 |
Total | | | 208,909 | | | 123,148 |
Later than 1 year but not later than 5 years | | | | | ||
Exploration commitmentsi) | | | 9,449 | | | 4,762 |
Contracts – Property plant and equipment | | | 51,187 | | | — |
Contracts - Operatingii) | | | 33,302 | | | 3,832 |
Total | | | 93,938 | | | 8,594 |
i) | The Group must meet minimum expenditure commitments in relation to option agreements over exploration tenements and to maintain those tenements in good standing. The commitments exist at balance sheet date but have not been brought to account. If the relevant mineral tenement is relinquished the expenditure commitment also ceases. |
ii) | The Group has contractual commitments regarding purchase agreements for construction and equipment at its operations and development sites. |
iii) | The Group has contractual commitments regarding purchase agreements for consumables and energy at its operations. |
- | When the GST/VAT incurred on a sale or a purchase of assets or services is not payable to or recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST/VAT is recognised as part of the revenue or the expense item or as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset, as applicable, and |
- | When receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST/VAT included. |
| | | | | | Page | |||
| | ||||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | ||||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | ||||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | ||||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Page | |||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | ||||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | ||||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Page | |||
| | ||||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | ||||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | ||||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | |
Exhibit A | | | Conditions to the Scheme | | | |
Exhibit B | | | Required Governmental Consents | | | |
Exhibit C | | | Form of Deed Poll | | | |
Exhibit D | | | Form of Scheme of Arrangement | | | |
Exhibit E | | | Forms of Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association of New Topco | | | |
Exhibit F | | | Form of Joinder Agreement | | |
Defined Term | | | Location |
“Agreement” | | | Preamble |
“Anaconda” | | | Preamble |
“Anaconda ASIC Documents” | | | Section 4.4(a) |
“Anaconda Canadian Securities Commissions Documents” | | | Section 4.12(a)(ii) |
“Anaconda Board of Directors” | | | Recitals, Section 5.4(i) |
“Anaconda Board Recommendation” | | | Recitals |
“Anaconda Capitalization Date” | | | Section 4.2(a) |
“Anaconda Change of Recommendation” | | | Section 5.4(d)(vi) |
“Anaconda Disclosure Documents” | | | Section 4.12(a)(ii) |
“Anaconda Disclosure Letter” | | | Article IV |
“Anaconda Governing Documents” | | | Section 4.1 |
“Anaconda Indemnified Parties” | | | Section 6.4 |
“Anaconda Leased Real Property” | | | Section 4.15(b) |
“Anaconda Material Contracts” | | | Section 4.17(a) |
“Anaconda Nominees” | | | Section 6.10(a)(ii) |
“Anaconda Owned Real Property” | | | Section 4.15(a) |
“Anaconda Permits” | | | Section 4.7(b) |
“Anaconda Permitted Lien” | | | Section 4.15(a) |
“Anaconda Related Parties” | | | Section 8.2(e)(ii) |
“Anaconda Representative” | | | Section 5.1(a) |
“Anaconda Shares” | | | Recitals |
Defined Term | | | Location |
“Anaconda Termination Fee” | | | Section 8.2(c) |
“Applicable Date” | | | Section 3.4(a) |
“Audit Committee” | | | Section 6.10(a)(vii) |
“CDI” | | | Recitals |
“Certificate of Merger” | | | Section 2.4 |
“Code” | | | Recitals |
“Commissioner” | | | Recitals |
“Compensation Committee” | | | Section 6.10(a)(vii) |
“Continuation Period” | | | Section 6.6(a) |
“Continuing Employees” | | | Section 6.6(b) |
“D&O Insurance” | | | Section 6.4(c) |
“Damages” | | | Section 8.2(e)(i) |
“Delaware Code” | | | Section 2.2 |
“DTC” | | | Section 2.8(b) |
“Duties Act” | | | Recitals |
“Effective Time” | | | Section 2.4 |
“Enforceability Exceptions” | | | Section 3.3(a) |
“Excess Offer Shares” | | | Section 2.8(h) |
“Exchange Agent” | | | Section 2.1 |
“Exchange Fund” | | | Section 2.8(a) |
“FATA” | | | Exhibit A |
“Form S-4” | | | Section 5.5(a)(i) |
“Fractional Share Consideration” | | | Section 2.8(h) |
“Indemnified Parties” | | | Section 6.4 |
“Independent Expert Event” | | | Section 5.4(e)(iv) |
“Intended Tax Treatment” | | | Recitals |
“Irish IntermediateCo” | | | Recitals |
“Joinder Agreements” | | | Recitals |
“Labor Organization” | | | Section 3.13(b) |
“Letter of Transmittal” | | | Section 2.8(b) |
“Lion” | | | Preamble |
“Lion Assumed Option” | | | Section 2.9(c) |
“Lion Assumed RSU” | | | Section 2.9(a)(i) |
“Lion Board of Directors” | | | Recitals, Section 5.3(i) |
“Lion Board Recommendation” | | | Recitals |
“Lion Capitalization Date” | | | Section 3.2(a) |
“Lion Cancelled Director RSUs” | | | Section 2.9(d) |
“Lion Cancelled RSUs” | | | Section 2.9(a)(ii) |
“Lion Change of Recommendation” | | | Section 5.3(d)(vi) |
“Lion Director RSU” | | | Section 2.9(d) |
“Lion Disclosure Letter” | | | Article III |
“Lion Eligible Shares” | | | Section 2.7(a) |
“Lion Excluded Shares” | | | Section 2.7(a) |
“Lion Filings” | | | Section 3.4(a) |
“Lion Governing Documents” | | | Section 3.1 |
“Lion Indemnified Parties” | | | Section 6.4 |
“Lion Leased Real Property” | | | Section 3.15(b) |
“Lion Material Contracts” | | | Section 3.18(a) |
“Lion Nominees” | | | Section 6.10(a)(ii) |
“Lion Option” | | | Section 2.9(c) |
Defined Term | | | Location |
“Lion Owned Real Property” | | | Section 3.15(a) |
“Lion Permits” | | | Section 3.7(b) |
“Lion Permitted Lien” | | | Section 3.15(a) |
“Lion Preferred Stock” | | | Section 3.2(a) |
“Lion PSU” | | | Section 2.9(b) |
“Lion Related Parties” | | | Section 8.2(e)(i) |
“Lion Representative” | | | Section 5.2(a) |
“Lion RSU” | | | Section 2.9(a)(i) |
“Lion Shares” | | | Recitals |
“Lion Termination Fee” | | | Section 8.2(b) |
“Merger” | | | Recitals |
“Merger Closing” | | | Section 2.3 |
“Merger Consideration” | | | Section 2.7(a) |
“Merger Exchange Ratio” | | | Recitals |
“Merger Sub Stockholder Approval” | | | Section 3.3(a)(iii) |
“New Topco” | | | Preamble |
“New Topco Board” | | | Recitals |
“New Topco Capital Increase” | | | Section 6.10(b) |
“New Topco Share” | | | Recitals |
“New Plans” | | | Section 6.6(b) |
“Nominating Committee” | | | Section 6.10(a)(vii) |
“Outstanding Performance Rights” | | | Section 1.5(a) |
“Parties” | | | Preamble |
“Party” | | | Preamble |
“Payment” | | | Section 8.2(d) |
“Payor” | | | Section 8.2(d) |
“Proceedings” | | | Section 3.11 |
“Proxy Statement” | | | Section 5.5(a)(i) |
“Recipient” | | | Section 8.2(d) |
“Replacement Awards” | | | Section 1.5(c) |
“Restriction” | | | Section 6.2(b)(i) |
“Sale Nominee” | | | Section 1.4(a) |
“Sarbanes-Oxley Act” | | | Section 3.5 |
“Scheme Consideration” | | | Recitals |
“Subdivision 14-D” | | | Section 2.10 |
“Surviving Corporation” | | | Section 2.2 |
“Sustainability Committee” | | | Section 6.10(a)(vii) |
“Transaction Litigation” | | | Section 6.8 |
“Transactions” | | | Recitals |
“Treasurer” | | | Exhibit A |
“Unvested Performance Rights” | | | Section 1.5(a)(i) |
“U.S. Merger Sub” | | | Preamble |
“VAT Amount” | | | Section 9.4 |
| | ALLKEM LIMITED | ||||
| | | | |||
| | By: | | | /s/ Martín Pérez de Solay | |
| | Name: | | | Martín Pérez de Solay | |
| | Title: | | | Chief Executive Officer |
| | LIGHTNING-A LIMITED | ||||
| | | | |||
| | By: | | | /s/ Juan Carlos Cruz Chellew | |
| | Name: | | | Juan Carlos Cruz Chellew | |
| | Title: | | | Director |
| | LIVENT CORPORATION | ||||
| | | | |||
| | By: | | | /s/ Paul Graves | |
| | Name: | | | Paul Graves | |
| | Title: | | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
1. | Subject to paragraph 4 of this Exhibit A, the Parties’ obligations with respect to the Scheme Implementation do not become binding unless and until satisfaction or, to the extent permitted by applicable Law, waiver by each of Anaconda and Lion on or before the Sanction Date of the following conditions: |
(a) | as at 8:00 a.m. AWST on the Sanction Date, each of the conditions set out in this Exhibit A (other than the conditions in paragraph 1(b) and paragraph 1(c) of this Exhibit A) has been satisfied or waived (where permitted); |
(b) | the approval by the Court (or any court of competent jurisdiction on appeal therefrom) (without material modification) of the Scheme pursuant to Section 411(4)(b) of the Australian Act; |
(c) | the lodging by Anaconda of an office copy of the Court approving the Scheme under Section 411(4)(b) of the Australian Act; |
(d) | the Merger Closing shall be capable of occurring, and would reasonably be expected to occur, as promptly as practicable following the Scheme Implementation in accordance with the Steps Plan; |
(e) | the Anaconda Shareholder Approval being duly obtained at the Scheme Meeting (or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in each case at which a vote on such approval was taken); |
(f) | the Lion Stockholder Approval being duly obtained at the Lion Special Meeting (or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in each case at which a vote on such approval was taken); |
(g) | (i) the NYSE having approved the listing of the New Topco Shares to be issued to the holders of Lion Shares and the New Topco Shares, including New Topco Shares underlying the CDIs, to be issued to holders of Anaconda Shares pursuant to the Scheme and the Merger, subject to official notice of issuance, and (ii) ASX having provided approval for the admission of New Topco as a foreign exempt listing to the official list of ASX and the approval for official quotation of the CDIs, whether or not such approval is subject to conditions; |
(h) | all applicable Governmental Consents under the respective Antitrust Laws and the Investment Screening Laws of the jurisdictions set forth in Exhibit B on any terms described therein (as the same may be amended with the written consent of Anaconda and Lion) with respect to the Scheme and the Merger shall have been obtained or made (as applicable) and remain in full force and effect and all applicable waiting periods (including any extensions by agreement or operation of law) applicable to the Scheme and the Merger with respect thereto shall have expired, lapsed or been terminated (as applicable); |
(i) | the Form S-4 shall have become effective under the Securities Act and shall not be the subject of any stop order (which has not been withdrawn) or Proceedings initiated by the SEC seeking any stop order; |
(j) | (i) no Governmental Entity of a competent jurisdiction shall have issued any Order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) that is in effect and restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the consummation of the Merger or the Scheme and (ii) no Governmental Entity having jurisdiction over any Party shall have adopted any Law that is in effect and makes consummation of the Merger or the Scheme illegal or otherwise prohibited (it being understood that if any such Law arises out of or relates to Antitrust Laws or Investment Screening Laws, the presence of such Law will only be a failure to meet a condition under this paragraph 1(j) of this Exhibit A to the extent it would constitute a Material Restraint); |
(k) | as at 8:00 a.m. AWST on the Sanction Date, neither the Agreement nor the Deed Poll having been terminated in accordance with its terms. |
2. | Subject to paragraph 5 of this Exhibit A, Anaconda’s obligations with respect to the Scheme Implementation will also be conditional upon the satisfaction or, to the extent permitted by applicable Law, waiver by Anaconda on or before the Sanction Date of the following conditions: |
(a) | (i) the representations and warranties of Lion set forth in Section 3.2(a), Section 3.2(b), Section 3.2(c), Section 3.2(f), Section 3.2(g) and Section 3.2(h) (in the case of Section 3.2(f), Section 3.2(g) and Section 3.2(h), only as applied to Lion and not Lion Subsidiaries) shall be true and correct, subject only to de minimis inaccuracies, (A) on the date of this Agreement and (B) at the Sanction Date as though made |
(b) | Each of Lion and the New Topco Parties shall have in all material respects performed the obligations and complied with the covenants required by the Agreement to be performed or complied with by it prior to the Sanction Date; |
(c) | Lion shall have delivered to Anaconda a certificate, dated as of the Sanction Date and signed by the Chief Executive Officer of Lion, certifying on behalf of Lion to the effect that the conditions set forth in paragraphs 2(a) and 2(b) of this Exhibit A have been satisfied; |
(d) | there shall not have been any Lion Material Adverse Effect; |
(e) | the Independent Expert shall have issued the IER, which concludes that the Scheme is in the best interest of Anaconda Shareholders and the Independent Expert does not change, withdraw or qualify its conclusion in any written update to its IER or withdraw the IER; and |
(f) | Anaconda shall have received confirmation (verbal or otherwise) from the ATO that either (1) there are no material impediments to or material issues to be resolved which may prevent the ATO from issuing the ATO Class Ruling or (2) the ATO is prepared to issue the ATO Class Ruling, in a form and substance satisfactory to Anaconda (acting reasonably), confirming that qualifying Australian resident Anaconda Shareholders will be eligible to choose rollover relief to the extent to which they receive New Topco Shares or CDIs in exchange for their Anaconda Shares in connection with the Scheme. For the avoidance of doubt, should an ATO Class Ruling not be available for all qualifying Australian resident Anaconda Shareholders, an ATO Class Ruling that includes (or would include, when issued) a confirmation that qualifying Australian resident shareholders who hold their shares on capital account are eligible to claim rollover relief will be acceptable to Anaconda. |
3. | Subject to paragraph 6 of this Exhibit A, Lion’s and New Topco’s obligations with respect to the Scheme Implementation will also be conditional upon the satisfaction or, to the extent permitted by applicable Law, waiver by Lion on or before the Sanction Date of the following conditions: |
(a) | (i) the representations and warranties of Anaconda set forth in Section 4.2(a), Section 4.2(c), Section 4.2(d) and Section 4.2(e) (in the case of Section 4.2(c), Section 4.2(d) and Section 4.2(e), only as applied to Anaconda and not Anaconda Subsidiaries) shall be true and correct, subject only to de minimis inaccuracies, (A) on the date of this Agreement and (B) at the Sanction Date as though made on the Sanction Date (in each case except to the extent that any such representation and warranty speaks as of a particular date, in which case such representation and warranty shall be so true and correct as of such date); (ii) the representations and warranties of Anaconda set forth in (x) Section 4.10(a) shall be true and correct in all respects and (y) the first sentence of Section 4.1, Section 4.2(b), Section 4.2(c), Section 4.2(d), Section 4.2(e), Section 4.2(f), Section 4.3(a), Section 4.16 and Section 4.19 (in the case of Section 4.2(c), |
(b) | Anaconda shall have in all material respects performed the obligations and complied with the covenants required by the Agreement to be performed or complied with by it prior to the Sanction Date; |
(c) | Anaconda shall have delivered to Lion a certificate, dated as of the Sanction Date and signed by the Chief Executive Officer of Anaconda, certifying on behalf of Anaconda to the effect that the conditions set forth in paragraphs 3(a) and 3(b) of this Exhibit A have been satisfied; |
(d) | there shall not have been any Anaconda Material Adverse Effect; and |
(e) | Lion shall have sought and received an opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, or, if Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP is unable or unwilling to provide such opinion, Sidley Austin LLP (whichever such firm delivers such opinion, “Company Tax Counsel”), dated as of the Sanction Date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Lion, to the effect that, on the basis of facts, representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion and as of the date thereof, (i) either (A) the Merger should qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code or (B) the Merger and the Scheme, taken together, should qualify as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code, and (ii) the transfer of Lion Eligible Shares by Lion Stockholders pursuant to the Merger (other than by any Lion Stockholder who is a U.S. person and would be a “five-percent transferee shareholder” (within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.367(a)-3(c)(5)(ii)) of New Topco following the Merger that does not enter into a five-year gain recognition agreement in the form provided in Treasury Regulations Section 1.367(a)-8(c)) should qualify for an exception to Section 367(a)(1) of the Code. In rendering such opinion, Company Tax Counsel may rely on the tax representation letters provided for in Section 6.13(c), and such other information provided to it by Lion, New Topco and/or Anaconda for purposes of rendering such opinion. |
4. | Anaconda and Lion reserve the right (but shall be under no obligation) to waive (to the extent permitted by applicable Law), in whole or in part, all or any of the conditions in paragraph 1 of this Exhibit A (provided that each Party agrees to any such waiver). |
5. | Anaconda reserves the right (but shall be under no obligation) to waive, in whole or in part, to the extent permitted by applicable Law, all or any of the conditions in paragraph 2. |
6. | Lion reserves the right (but shall be under no obligation) to waive, in whole or in part, to the extent permitted by applicable Law, all or any of the conditions in paragraph 3. |
1. | Australia, pursuant to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) |
2. | Canada, pursuant to the Competition Act 1985 |
3. | China, pursuant to the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China |
4. | Japan, pursuant to the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Law No. 54 of 1947) |
5. | South Korea, pursuant to the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act |
6. | U.S., pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 |
1. | Australia, pursuant to the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (Cth) (“FATA”), on the following terms: |
a. | New Topco has received written notice under the FATA, by or on behalf of the Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia (“Treasurer”), advising that (or to the effect that) the Commonwealth Government of Australia has no objections to the Scheme, and where it would be a notifiable action or a notifiable national security action under the FATA, the Merger, either unconditionally or subject only to (A) “standard” tax conditions which are in the form, or substantially in the form, of those set out in Part D of the Australian Foreign Investment Review Board’s Guidance Note 12 “Tax Conditions” (in the form last updated on 9 July 2021) and (B) any conditions or undertakings that are acceptable to Anaconda, Lion and New Topco, each acting reasonably; or |
b. | following the giving of notice of the Transactions under the FATA, the Treasurer becomes precluded by passage of time from making an order or decision under Division 2 of Part 3 of the FATA in respect of the Scheme, where it would be or involve a notifiable action or a notifiable national security action under the FATA, the Merger, and the 10 day period referred to in section 82(2)(a) of the FATA has ended or the period referred to in section 82(2)(b) of the FATA has ended (whichever is applicable). |
2. | UK, pursuant to the National Security and Investment Act 2022 |
3. | U.S., consisting of the CFIUS Approval |
1. | Any jurisdiction if and to the extent an Antitrust Law or Investment Screening Law thereof enters into force after the date of the Agreement and prior to the Sanction Date which requires a Governmental Consent with respect to the Scheme or the Merger, provided that the violation or contravention of such Antitrust Law or Investment Screening Law would reasonably be expected to result in a material and adverse effect on New Topco and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, on an ongoing basis following the Effective Time. |
2. | Any jurisdiction if and to the extent a Governmental Entity thereof exercises authority pursuant to an Antitrust Law or Investment Screening Law to require any Party to seek or obtain a Governmental Consent therefrom prior to the Sanction Date, provided that the violation or contravention of such requirement would reasonably be expected to result in a material and adverse effect on New Topco and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, on an ongoing basis following the Effective Time. |
(A) | On or about 10 May 2023, Allkem, Livent and New TopCo entered into a transaction agreement with respect to (among other things) the Scheme and associated matters (Transaction Agreement). |
(B) | Under the Transaction Agreement: |
(1) | Allkem has agreed to propose the Scheme, pursuant to which (among other things): |
(i) | New TopCo will provide to each Eligible Shareholder the Scheme Consideration in respect of each of their Scheme Shares; and |
(ii) | the Eligible Shareholders will transfer to New TopCo, and New TopCo will acquire, all of the Scheme Shares; and |
(2) | New TopCo has agreed to (among other things) enter into this Deed Poll. |
(C) | New TopCo is executing this Deed Poll to covenant in favour of the Eligible Shareholders and the Ineligible Overseas Shareholders to perform its obligations under the Scheme. |
1 | INTERPRETATION |
1.1 | Definitions |
(a) | an administrator being appointed to the person; |
(b) | any of the following occurring: |
(i) | a controller or analogous person being appointed to the person or any of the person’s property; |
(ii) | an application being made to a court for an order to appoint a controller, provisional liquidator, trustee for creditors or in bankruptcy or analogous person to the person or any of the person’s property, other than where the application is stayed, withdrawn, dismissed or set aside within 14 days; or |
(iii) | an appointment of the kind referred to in subparagraph (ii) being made (whether or not following a resolution or application); |
(c) | the person being taken under section 459F(1) of the Corporations Act to have failed to comply with a statutory demand; |
(d) | an application being made to a court for an order for its winding up which is not set aside within 14 days; |
(e) | an order being made, or the person passing a resolution, for its winding up; |
(f) | the person: |
(i) | suspending payment of its debts, ceasing (or threatening to cease) to carry on all or a material part of its business, stating that it is unable to pay its debts or being or becoming otherwise insolvent; or |
(ii) | being unable to pay its debts or otherwise insolvent; |
(g) | the person entering into a compromise or arrangement with, or assignment for the benefit of, its members or creditors generally; |
(h) | a court or other authority enforcing any judgment or order against the person for the payment of money or the recovery of any property; or |
(i) | any analogous event under the laws of any applicable jurisdiction, |
1.2 | Rules for interpreting this Deed Poll |
2 | NATURE OF THIS DEED POLL |
(a) | This Deed Poll may be relied on and enforced by any Scheme Shareholder and by the Sale Nominee in accordance with its terms even though the Scheme Shareholders and the Sale Nominee are not party to it; and |
(b) | Under the Scheme, each Scheme Shareholder and the Sale Nominee each irrevocably appoints Allkem and each of its directors and officers, jointly and severally, as its agent and attorney to enforce this Deed Poll against New TopCo. |
3 | CONDITIONS PRECEDENT AND TERMINATION |
3.1 | Conditions precedent |
3.2 | Termination |
(a) | Unless New TopCo and Allkem otherwise agree in writing (and, if required, as approved by the Court), New TopCo’s obligations under this Deed Poll will automatically terminate, and the terms of this Deed Poll will be of no further force or effect, if the Transaction Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms. |
(b) | If this Deed Poll is terminated pursuant to clause 3.2(a): |
(i) | New TopCo is released from its obligations under this Deed Poll; and |
(ii) | each Scheme Shareholder and the Sale Nominee retains any rights, powers or remedies it has against New TopCo in respect of any breach of this Deed Poll that occurred before it was terminated. |
4 | SCHEME OBLIGATIONS |
4.1 | Undertaking to provide Scheme Consideration |
(a) | provide the Scheme Consideration to each Eligible Shareholder on the Scheme Implementation Date; and |
(b) | undertake and perform all other actions and obligations, and give each covenant, attributed to it or otherwise contemplated of it under the Scheme, as if named as a party to the Scheme, |
4.2 | Consideration Shares to rank equally |
(a) | be duly issued and fully paid; |
(b) | be free from any Encumbrances, pledges and interests of third parties of any kind; and |
(c) | rank equally in all respects, including for future dividends, with all existing New TopCo Shares then on issue. |
5 | PERFORMANCE OF OBLIGATIONS GENERALLY |
5.1 | Performance of the Scheme |
6 | REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES |
(a) | (status) it is a validly existing corporation in accordance with the laws of its place of incorporation and remains in good standing thereunder; |
(b) | (power) it has full legal capacity and power to enter into this Deed Poll and to carry out the transactions contemplated by this Deed Poll; |
(c) | (corporate authority) it has taken all corporate action that is necessary to authorise it to enter into this Deed Poll and it has taken or will take all corporate action that is necessary to authorise it to carry out the transactions contemplated by this Deed Poll; |
(d) | (Deed Poll effective) this Deed Poll constitutes valid and binding obligations on it, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms; |
(e) | (no contravention) the entry by it into, its compliance with its obligations and the exercise of its rights under, this Deed Poll do not and will not conflict with: |
(i) | its constituent documents or cause a limitation on its powers or the powers of its directors to be exceeded; or |
(ii) | any law binding on or applicable to it or its assets, |
(f) | (no Insolvency Event) it is not affected by an Insolvency Event. |
7 | CONTINUING OBLIGATIONS |
(a) | New TopCo having fully performed its obligations under this Deed Poll; and |
(b) | termination of this Deed Poll pursuant to clause 3.2. |
8 | NOTICES |
8.1 | How to give a notice |
(a) | in writing, legible and in English, signed by or on behalf of the person giving it; |
(b) | addressed to the person to whom it is to be given; and |
(c) | either: |
(i) | delivered or sent by pre-paid mail (by airmail, if the addressee is overseas) to that person’s address; or |
(ii) | sent in electronic form (such as email). |
8.2 | When a notice is given |
(a) | if sent by mail: |
(i) | within Australia – three Business Days after posting; or |
(ii) | to or from a place outside Australia – seven Business Days after posting; |
(b) | if sent in electronic form: |
(i) | if it is transmitted by 5.00 pm on a Business Day – when sent; or |
(ii) | if it is transmitted after 5.00 pm on a Business Day, or at any time on a day that is not a Business Day – on the next Business Day, |
8.3 | Address for notices |
Address: | | | Percy Exchange, 8-34 Percy Place, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 |
Email: | | | [•] |
Attention: | | | Attention: The Secretary |
Copy to: | | | Guy Alexander, Allens at Guy.Alexander@allens.com.au William H. Aaronson, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP at william.aaronson@davispolk.com Cheryl Chan, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP at cheryl.chan@davispolk.com |
9 | GENERAL |
9.1 | Amendment |
(a) | before the Second Court Date, the amendment or variation is agreed to in writing by Allkem (on behalf of each Scheme Shareholder but without the need for Allkem to refer the amendment or variation to any Scheme Shareholder) and, if required, is approved by the Court; or |
(b) | on or after the Second Court Date, the amendment or variation is agreed to in writing by Allkem (on behalf of each Scheme Shareholder and the Sale Nominee but without the need for Allkem to refer the amendment or variation to any Scheme Shareholder or the Sale Nominee) and is approved by the Court, |
9.2 | Assignment |
(a) | The rights created by this Deed Poll are personal to New TopCo, each Scheme Shareholder and the Sale Nominee and, except with the prior written consent of Allkem and New TopCo, cannot and must not be assigned, encumbered, charged or otherwise dealt with at law or in equity by a Scheme Shareholder or by the Sale Nominee. |
(b) | Any purported dealing in contravention of clause 9.2(a) is invalid. |
9.3 | Waiver of rights |
(a) | no other conduct of a party (including a failure to exercise, or delay in exercising, the right) operates as a waiver of the right or otherwise prevents the exercise of that right; |
(b) | a waiver of a right on one or more occasions does not operate as a waiver of that right if it arises again; and |
(c) | the exercise, or partial exercise, of a right does not prevent any further exercise of that right or of any other right. |
9.4 | Operation of this Deed Poll |
(a) | The rights, powers and remedies of New TopCo, the Scheme Shareholders and the Sale Nominee under this Deed Poll are in addition to, and do not replace, exclude or limit, any other rights, powers or remedies provided by law independently of this Deed Poll. |
(b) | Any provision of this Deed Poll that is void, illegal or unenforceable: |
(i) | in a particular jurisdiction does not affect the validity, legality or enforceability of that provision in any other jurisdiction or of the remaining provisions of this Deed Poll in that or any other jurisdiction; and |
(ii) | is, where possible, to be severed to the extent necessary to make this Deed Poll valid, legal or enforceable, unless this would materially change the intended effect of this Deed Poll. |
9.5 | Duty |
(a) | pay all stamp duty payable or assessed as being payable in connection with this Deed Poll, the Scheme, or the transfer by the Eligible Shareholders of the Scheme Shares pursuant to the Scheme (including any fees, fines, penalties and interest in connection with any of these amounts); and |
(b) | indemnify each Eligible Shareholder against any liability arising from any failure by New TopCo to comply with clause 9.5(a). |
9.6 | Consent |
9.7 | Further acts |
9.8 | Governing law |
(a) | This Deed Poll and any dispute arising out of or in connection with the subject matter of this Deed Poll is governed by the laws of Western Australia. |
(b) | New TopCo irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia (Western Australian registry) and of the courts competent to determine appeals from that court with respect to any proceedings |
Signed Sealed and Delivered by New TopCo in the presence of: | | | ![]() |
| | ||
Signature of Witness | | | Signature of Authorised Signatory |
| | ||
Name of Witness | | | Name of Authorised Signatory |
(1) | Allkem Limited (ACN 112 589 910) whose registered office is at Level 35, 71 Eagle Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 (Allkem); |
(2) | Eligible Shareholders; and |
(3) | Ineligible Overseas Shareholders. |
(A) | Allkem is a public company limited by shares incorporated in Australia. It has its registered office at registered office is at Level 35, 71 Eagle Street, Brisbane QLD 4000. Allkem is admitted to the official list of ASX and Allkem Shares are quoted on the securities exchange operated by ASX and the TSX. |
(C) | Livent Corporation (Livent) is a public corporation incorporated in Delaware, in the United States of America. It has its principal executive office at [•]. Livent stock is listed on NYSE. |
(D) | New TopCo (New TopCo) is a public limited company incorporated under the laws of the Bailiwick of Jersey. It has its registered address at [•]. |
(E) | Allkem, Livent and New TopCo entered into the Transaction Agreement on or about 10 May 2023 to facilitate (among other things) the implementation of this Scheme as part of the Transaction. |
(F) | By no later than the day that is one Business Day prior to the First Court Date, New TopCo will have executed the Deed Poll under which New TopCo will covenant in favour of the Eligible Shareholders and Ineligible Overseas Shareholders to perform the obligations attributable to it under this Scheme, including to provide the Scheme Consideration to Eligible Shareholders in accordance with the terms of this Scheme. |
(G) | If this Scheme becomes Effective: |
(a) | after the Scheme Record Date and prior to Scheme Implementation, all of the Ineligible Shares will be transferred to the Sale Nominee; and |
(b) | on the Implementation Date: |
(i) | New TopCo will provide the Scheme Consideration to Eligible Shareholders (including the Sale Nominee) in accordance with the terms of this Scheme and the Deed Poll; |
(ii) | all of the Scheme Shares, and all of the rights and entitlements attaching to them as at the Implementation Date, will be transferred to New TopCo; and |
(iii) | Allkem will enter New TopCo’s name in the Allkem Share Register as the holder of all of the Scheme Shares; and |
(c) | following the Implementation Date, the Consideration CDIs issued to the Sale Nominee on Scheme Implementation in respect of the Ineligible Shares transferred to it under paragraph (a) will be sold by the Sale Nominee, with the net proceeds of such Consideration CDIs being paid to the Ineligible Overseas Shareholders on a pro-rata basis. |
1 | INTERPRETATION |
1.1 | Definitions |
(a) | when used in relation to the Implementation Date and the Scheme Record Date, has the meaning given in the ASX Listing Rules; and |
(b) | in all other cases, means any day other than: |
(i) | a Saturday or a Sunday; or |
(ii) | a day on which banking and savings and loan institutions are authorised or required by law to be closed in Perth, Western Australia, Australia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, the Bailiwick of Jersey or Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America. |
(a) | a Scheme Shareholder who is not an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder; and |
(b) | the Sale Nominee. |
(a) | a Security Interest; or |
(b) | an easement, restrictive covenant, caveat or similar restriction over property. |
(a) | each Allkem Share held by a Scheme Shareholder (other than an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder) as at the Scheme Record Date; and |
(b) | each Allkem Share held by an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder and transferred to the Sale Nominee after the Scheme Record Date and prior to Scheme Implementation pursuant to clause 4.4 of this Scheme. |
(a) | a security interest that is subject to the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth); |
(b) | any other mortgage, charge, pledge or lien; or |
(c) | any other interest or arrangement of any kind that in substance secures the payment of money or the performance of an obligation, or that gives a creditor priority over unsecured creditors in relation to any property. |
1.2 | Rules for interpreting this Scheme |
(a) | A reference to: |
(i) | a legislative provision or legislation (including subordinate legislation) is to that provision or legislation as amended, re-enacted or replaced, and includes any subordinate legislation issued under it; |
(ii) | a clause is to a clause of this Scheme; |
(iii) | a document (including this Scheme) or agreement, or a provision of a document (including this Scheme) or agreement, is to that document, agreement or provision as amended, supplemented, replaced or novated; |
(iv) | a group of persons is a reference to any 2 or more of them jointly and to each of them individually; |
(v) | a party to this Scheme, or to any other document or agreement, includes a permitted substitute or a permitted assign of that party; |
(vi) | a person includes any type of entity or body of persons, whether or not it is incorporated or has a separate legal identity, and any executor, administrator or successor in law of the person; and |
(vii) | any thing (including a right, amount, obligation or concept) includes each part of it. |
(b) | A singular word includes the plural, and vice versa. |
(c) | A word that suggests one gender includes the other genders. |
(d) | If a word or phrase is defined, any other grammatical form of that word or phrase has a corresponding meaning. |
(e) | If an example is given of anything (including a right, obligation or concept), such as by saying it includes something else, the example does not limit the scope of that thing. |
(f) | The word officer has the same meaning as given by the Corporations Act. |
(g) | A reference to A$, $ or dollar is to Australian currency. |
(h) | A reference to time in this Scheme is a reference to Australian Western Standard Time, unless otherwise expressly specified. |
(i) | Nothing in this Scheme is to be construed adversely to a party just because that party prepared this Scheme or prepared or proposed the relevant part of this Scheme. |
1.3 | Non–Business Days |
2 | CONDITIONS PRECEDENT |
2.1 | Conditions precedent to the Scheme |
(a) | As at 8.00 am on the Second Court Date, the conditions in Exhibit A of the Transaction Agreement (other than the conditions in paragraph 1(b) and 1(c) of Exhibit A of the Transaction Agreement) has been satisfied or waived in accordance with the terms of the Transaction Agreement. |
(b) | Prior to 8.00 am on the Second Court Date, neither the Transaction Agreement nor the Deed Poll has been terminated in accordance with their terms. |
(c) | The order of the Court made under section 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act (and, if applicable, section 411(6) of the Corporations Act, subject to such alterations or conditions being agreed in accordance with clause 3.3) approving this Scheme comes into effect pursuant to section 411(10) of the Corporations Act on or before either or both of the Transaction Agreement and the Deed Poll are terminated in accordance with their respective terms. |
2.2 | Certificates |
(a) | Before 8.30 am on the Second Court Date: |
(i) | Allkem must provide to the Court: |
(A) | a certificate, in the form of a deed, confirming whether or not, in respect of matters within Allkem’s knowledge, the conditions precedent in clause 2.1(a) and 2.1(b) have been satisfied |
(B) | a certificate from Livent, in the form of a deed, confirming whether or not, in respect of matters within Livent’s knowledge, the conditions precedent in clause 2.1(a) and 2.1(b) have been satisfied; and |
(ii) | New TopCo must provide to the Court a certificate, in the form of a deed, confirming whether or not, in respect of matters within New TopCo’s knowledge, the conditions precedent in clause 2.1(a) and 2.1(b) have been satisfied. |
(b) | The certificates referred to in clause 2.2(a) constitute conclusive evidence that the conditions precedent in clauses 2.1(a) and 2.1(b) have been satisfied. |
2.3 | Scheme Effective Date |
2.4 | When Scheme will lapse |
3 | THE SCHEME |
3.1 | Lodgement of copy of Court Order with ASIC |
(a) | as soon as possible after the date on which the Court makes the Court Orders and in accordance with the time limit set out in item 10 of Appendix 7A of the ASX Listing Rules; or |
(b) | on such other Business Day and by such other time as agreed to in writing by Livent and Allkem. |
3.2 | Transfer of Scheme Shares |
(a) | subject to New TopCo taking the steps to provide the Scheme Consideration which it is required to take on the Scheme Implementation Date under clause 4, all of the Scheme Shares, together with all rights and entitlements attaching to the Scheme Shares as at the Scheme Implementation Date, will be transferred to New TopCo without the need for any further act by any Scheme Shareholder or the Sale Nominee (other than acts performed by Allkem or its directors and officers as attorney and agent for the Scheme Shareholders and the Sale Nominee under this Scheme) by: |
(i) | Allkem delivering to New TopCo a duly completed registrable Scheme Transfer to transfer the Scheme Shares to New TopCo, which Scheme Transfer has been duly executed by Allkem (or any of its directors and officers) as the attorney and agent of each Eligible Shareholder as a transferor under clauses 6.2 and 6.4; and |
(ii) | New TopCo duly completing and executing the Scheme Transfer as transferee and delivering the Scheme Transfer to Allkem for registration; and |
(b) | immediately following receipt of the Scheme Transfer in accordance with clause 3.2(a)(ii), Allkem must: |
(i) | attend to registration of the Scheme Transfer; and |
(ii) | enter or procure the entry of the name and address of New TopCo in the Allkem Share Register as the holder of all of the Scheme Shares. |
3.3 | Alteration or condition to Scheme |
(a) | Allkem may, by its counsel, consent on behalf of all persons concerned, including each Scheme Shareholder (and, to avoid doubt, the Sale Nominee), to those alterations or conditions; and |
(b) | each Scheme Shareholder (and, to avoid doubt, the Sale Nominee) agrees to any such alterations or conditions that counsel for Allkem has consented to. |
4 | SCHEME CONSIDERATION |
4.1 | Elections by Eligible Shareholders |
(a) | Each Eligible Shareholder (other than the Sale Nominee) may become a Share Electing Shareholder by providing Allkem with a duly completed Share Election before 7.00 pm (Sydney time) on the day that is three Business Days prior to the Scheme Record Date. |
(b) | To avoid doubt, a Share Election submitted by an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder will be of no force or effect. |
4.2 | Entitlement to Scheme Consideration |
(a) | On the Scheme Implementation Date, in consideration for the transfer to New TopCo of Scheme Shares under the terms of this Scheme, each Eligible Shareholder will be entitled to receive the Scheme Consideration in respect of each of their Scheme Shares in accordance with this clause 4. |
(b) | Subject to clauses 4.3 to 4.7 the Scheme Consideration to be provided to each Eligible Shareholder will be: |
(i) | where the Eligible Shareholder is not a Share Electing Shareholder or is the Sale Nominee , 1 Consideration CDI for each Scheme Share; and |
(ii) | where the Eligible Shareholder is a Share Electing Shareholder and is not the Sale Nominee, 1 Consideration Share for each Scheme Share. |
4.3 | Provision of Scheme Consideration |
(a) | on the Scheme Implementation Date (or, in the case of sub-paragraphs (C), (D), (E) and (F) of clause 4.3(a)(iii), by no later than the Business Day following the Scheme Implementation Date): |
(i) | issue to each Eligible Shareholder (or procure the issue to each Eligible Shareholder of) the applicable Scheme Consideration in accordance with this Scheme; |
(ii) | in the case of Scheme Consideration that is required to be provided to Eligible Shareholders in the form of Consideration Shares, procure that the name and address of each relevant Eligible Shareholder is entered in the New TopCo Share Register as the holder of the applicable Consideration Shares (being the name and Registered Address of the relevant Eligible Shareholder as at the Scheme Record Date); and |
(iii) | in the case of Scheme Consideration that is required to be provided to Eligible Shareholders in the form of Consideration CDIs: |
(A) | issue to CDN (or to a custodian who will hold the New TopCo Shares on CDN’s behalf) to be held on trust that number of New TopCo Shares that will enable CDN to issue Consideration CDIs as contemplated by this clause 4.3; |
(B) | procure that the name and address of CDN or of its custodian (as applicable) is entered into the New TopCo Share Register in respect of those New TopCo Shares underlying the Consideration CDIs, and that a share certificate or holding statement (or equivalent document) in the name of CDN representing those New TopCo Shares is sent to CDN; |
(C) | procure that CDN issues to each relevant Eligible Shareholder the number of Consideration CDIs to which it is entitled under this clause 4.3; and |
(D) | procure that the name and address of each relevant Eligible Shareholder is entered in the records maintained by CDN or its custodian (as applicable) or both, as the holder of the Consideration CDIs issued to that Eligible Shareholder; |
(E) | in the case of each such Eligible Shareholder who held Scheme Shares on the CHESS subregister, procure that the Consideration CDIs are held on the CHESS subregister; and |
(F) | in the case of each such Eligible Shareholder who held Scheme Shares on the issuer sponsored subregister, the Consideration CDIs are held on the issuer sponsored subregister; and |
(b) | no later than two Business Days after the Scheme Implementation Date, send or procure the dispatch to each Eligible Shareholder, to their Registered Address as at the Scheme Record Date (or, in the case of the Sale Nominee, as specified in the Ineligible Share Transfer), a securities certificate, holding statement or allotment confirmation representing the Consideration Shares or Consideration CDIs (as applicable) issued to that Eligible Shareholder. |
4.4 | Ineligible Overseas Shareholders |
(a) | New TopCo has no obligation to issue, and will not issue, any Scheme Consideration under this Scheme to any Ineligible Overseas Shareholder. |
(b) | Allkem must: |
(i) | prior to the First Court Hearing, appoint the Sale Nominee; |
(ii) | ensure that, under the Terms of Appointment, the Sale Nominee irrevocably undertakes to and is otherwise obliged to do all such things required by this clause 4.4 of this Scheme (including, but not limited to, under clause 4.4(c)); and |
(iii) | procure that the Sale Nominee: |
(A) | performs all acts attributed to it under this clause 4.4; and |
(B) | otherwise does all things necessary to give effect to this clause 4.4. |
(c) | After the Scheme Record Date, and prior to Scheme Implementation, all of the Allkem Shares which were held by Ineligible Overseas Shareholders as at the Scheme Record Date (each an Ineligible Share and together the Ineligible Shares), together with all rights and entitlements attaching to those Ineligible Shares, will be transferred to the Sale Nominee: |
(i) | without the need for any further act by any Ineligible Overseas Shareholder (other than acts performed by Allkem or its directors or officers as attorney and agent for the Ineligible Overseas Shareholders); and |
(ii) | on the basis that, if (1) the Scheme lapses under clause 2.4, or (2) Scheme Implementation has not occurred within 5 Business Days after the Scheme Record Date (or such later time determined by Allkem in its sole discretion), (each a Return Event), the Sale Nominee must return the Ineligible Consideration Shares to the relevant Ineligible Overseas Shareholders as soon as reasonably practicable (and in any event, no later than 15 Business Days after the date on which Allkem gives written notice of the Return Event to the Sale Nominee) without any cost incurred by or fee payable to the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder. |
(d) | Allkem must procure that the Sale Nominee accepts the transfer of the Ineligible Shares under clause 4.4(c) by immediately executing the Ineligible Share Transfer as transferee and delivering it to Allkem for registration. |
(e) | In order to give effect to the transfer of Ineligible Shares to the Sale Nominee under clause 4.4(c), Allkem will: |
(i) | as attorney and agent for each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, execute the Ineligible Share Transfer provided under clause 4.4(d); and |
(ii) | register the transfer of the Ineligible Shares to the Sale Nominee and enter the name of the Sale Nominee in the Allkem Share Register in respect of all of the Ineligible Shares transferred under clause 4.4(c). |
(f) | Allkem must procure that the Sale Nominee, and must enforce its contractual rights to ensure that the Sale Nominee: |
(i) | sells the CDIs issued as Scheme Consideration in respect of the Ineligible Shares (Ineligible Consideration CDIs) (on ASX or off-market) as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event no more than 15 Business Days after the Scheme Implementation Date, in the manner, and on the terms, the Sale Nominee determines in good faith (and at the risk of the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder); and |
(ii) | as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event no more than 10 Business Days after settlement of all the sales of the Ineligible Consideration CDIs under clause 4.4(f)(i), remits to Allkem the Net Proceeds. |
(g) | Promptly after receipt of the Net Proceeds, Allkem must pay each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, or procure the payment to each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder of, such proportion of the Net Proceeds to which that Ineligible Overseas Shareholder is entitled (rounded down to the nearest cent), to be determined in accordance with the following formula: |
(h) | The Net Proceeds will be payable to Ineligible Overseas Shareholders in Australian dollars. |
(i) | Each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder acknowledges and agrees that: |
(i) | none of Allkem, Livent, New TopCo or the Sale Nominee give any assurance as to the price or foreign exchange rate that will be achieved for the sale of the Ineligible Consideration CDIs described in clause 4.4(f); and |
(ii) | Allkem, Livent, New TopCo and the Sale Nominee each expressly disclaim any fiduciary duty to any Ineligible Overseas Shareholder that may arise in connection with this clause 4.4. |
(j) | Allkem must pay or procure that each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder is paid any amounts owing under clause 4.4(g) by either (in the absolute discretion of Allkem): |
(i) | where an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder has, before the Scheme Record Date, made a valid election in accordance with the requirements of the Allkem Share Registry to receive dividend payments from Allkem by electronic funds transfer to a bank account nominated by the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, paying, or procuring the payment of, the relevant amount in Australian currency by electronic means in accordance with that election; or |
(ii) | dispatching, or procuring the dispatch of, a cheque for the relevant amount in Australian currency to the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder by prepaid post to their Registered Address (as at the Scheme Record Date), such cheque being drawn in the name of the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder (in the case of joint holders, the cheque will be drawn in the name of the joint holders and dispatched in accordance with the procedures set out in clause 4.6(b)). |
(k) | Each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder appoints Allkem, and each director and officer of Allkem, as its agent to receive on its behalf any financial services guide (or similar or equivalent document) and any other notices (including any updates of those documents) that the Sale Nominee is required to provide to Ineligible Overseas Shareholders under the Corporations Act or any other applicable law. |
(l) | Payment of the relevant amounts calculated in accordance with clauses 4.4(g) to an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder in accordance with this clause 4.4 satisfies in full New TopCo’s obligations to the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder under this Scheme in respect of the Scheme Consideration. |
4.5 | Other ineligible Scheme Shareholders |
(a) | Where the issue of Scheme Consideration to which an Eligible Shareholder would otherwise be entitled under this Scheme would result in a breach of law: |
(i) | New TopCo will issue the maximum possible Scheme Consideration to that Eligible Shareholder without giving rise to such a breach; and |
(ii) | any further Scheme Consideration to which that Eligible Shareholder is entitled, but the issue of which to that Eligible Shareholder would give rise to such a breach, will instead be issued to the Sale Nominee and dealt with under clause 4.4, as if: |
(A) | references to “Ineligible Overseas Shareholders” also included that Eligible Shareholder; and |
(B) | references to “Ineligible Consideration CDIs” also included any of that Eligible Shareholder’s Scheme Consideration that has been issued to the Sale Nominee. |
(b) | Where the issue of Scheme Consideration to the Sale Nominee under this Scheme would result in a breach of law, Allkem must use its reasonable best efforts to appoint another person as the Sale Nominee in accordance with clause 4.4. |
4.6 | Joint holders |
(a) | any Scheme Consideration will be issued to and registered in the names of the joint holders; and |
(b) | any other document required to be sent under this Scheme will be forwarded to the holder whose name appears first in the Allkem Share Register as at the Scheme Record Date or to the joint holders. |
4.7 | Orders of a court or Governmental Entity |
(a) | If New TopCo or Allkem (or the Allkem Share Registry) receives written notice of an order or direction made by a court of competent jurisdiction or by a Governmental Entity that: |
(i) | requires consideration to be provided to a third party (either through payment of a sum or the issuance of a security) in respect of Scheme Shares held by a particular Eligible Shareholder, which would otherwise be payable or required to be issued to that Eligible Shareholder by Allkem or New TopCo in accordance with this clause 4 (including in connection with any withholding or deduction under clauses 4.7(b)), then Allkem or New TopCo (as applicable) will be entitled to procure that provision of that consideration is made in accordance with that order or direction; or |
(ii) | prevents Allkem or New TopCo from providing consideration to any particular Scheme Shareholder in accordance with this clause 4, or the payment or issuance of such consideration is otherwise prohibited by applicable law, Allkem or New TopCo (as applicable) will be entitled to: |
(A) | in the case of any Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, retain an amount, in Australian dollars, equal to the relevant Ineligible Overseas Shareholder’s share of any proceeds of sale received by Allkem pursuant to clause 4.4; and |
(B) | not issue (or, in the case of Allkem, direct New TopCo not to issue), or issue (or, in the case of Allkem, direct New TopCo to issue) to a permitted trustee or nominee, such Scheme Consideration as that Scheme Shareholder would otherwise be entitled to under clause 4.3, |
(b) | New TopCo and Allkem (as applicable) may deduct and withhold from any consideration that would otherwise be provided to a Scheme Shareholder in accordance with this clause 4, any amount that New TopCo or Allkem (as applicable) determines is required to be deducted and withheld from that consideration under any applicable law, including any order, direction or notice made or given by a court of competent jurisdiction or by another Government Entity. |
(c) | To the extent that amounts are so deducted or withheld, such deducted or withheld amounts will be treated for all purposes under this Scheme as having been paid to the person in respect of which such deduction and withholding was made, provided that such deducted or withheld amounts are actually remitted to the appropriate taxing agency. |
(d) | To avoid doubt, any payment or retention by Allkem or New TopCo (as applicable) under clauses 4.7(a), 4.7(b) and 4.7(c) will constitute the full discharge of New TopCo’s obligations under clause 4.3 with respect to the amount so paid or retained until, in the case of clause 4.7(a)(ii), the amount is no longer required to be retained. |
4.8 | Consideration Shares to rank equally |
(a) | the Consideration Shares to be issued (including the New TopCo Shares underlying the Consideration CDIs) as the Scheme Consideration will, on issue: |
(i) | be duly issued and fully paid in accordance with applicable laws and the memorandum and articles of association of New TopCo; |
(ii) | be free from any Encumbrances, pledges and interests of third parties of any kind, whether legal or otherwise, or restriction on transfer of any kind, other than as provided for in the memorandum and articles of association of New TopCo or as required under applicable law; and |
(iii) | rank equally in all respects, including for future dividends, with all existing New TopCo Shares then on issue; and |
(b) | it will apply for, or has applied for: |
(i) | the listing of the Consideration Shares on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance; |
(ii) | admission of New TopCo to the official list of ASX (as a foreign exempt listing) commencing on the Business Day following the Scheme Effective Date; and |
(iii) | official quotation of the Consideration CDIs on ASX, subject to customary conditions, commencing: |
(A) | on the Business Day following the Scheme Effective Date (or such later day as ASX may require) until the Scheme Implementation Date, on a deferred settlement basis; and |
(B) | on the Business Day following the Scheme Implementation Date, on an ordinary (T+2) basis. |
4.9 | Unclaimed monies |
(a) | Allkem may cancel a cheque issued under clause 4.4(j)(ii) if the cheque: |
(i) | is returned to Allkem; or |
(ii) | has not been presented for payment within 6 months after the date on which the cheque was sent. |
(b) | During the period of 12 months commencing on the Scheme Implementation Date, on request in writing from a Scheme Shareholder to Allkem (or the Allkem Share Registry) (which request may not be made until the date that is 20 Business Days after the Scheme Implementation Date), Allkem must reissue a cheque that was previously cancelled under clause 4.9(a). |
(c) | The Unclaimed Money Act will apply in relation to any Scheme Consideration that becomes “unclaimed money” (as defined in section 6 of the Unclaimed Money Act). |
4.10 | Title to and rights in Scheme Shares |
(a) | Immediately upon the provision of the Scheme Consideration to each Eligible Shareholder in accordance with this clause 4, New TopCo will be beneficially entitled to the Scheme Shares transferred to it under this Scheme pending registration by Allkem of the name and address of New TopCo in the Allkem Share Register as the holder of the Scheme Shares. |
(b) | To the extent permitted by law, the Scheme Shares (including all rights and entitlements attaching to the Scheme Shares) transferred under this Scheme to New TopCo will, at the time of transfer to New TopCo, vest in New TopCo free from all: |
(i) | Encumbrances, pledges and interests of third parties of any kind, whether legal or otherwise; and |
(ii) | restrictions on transfer of any kind. |
(c) | To avoid doubt, notwithstanding clause 4.10(a), to the extent that clause 4.7(a) applies to any Eligible Shareholder, New TopCo will be beneficially entitled to any Scheme Shares held by that Eligible Shareholder immediately upon compliance with clause 4.7 on the Scheme Implementation Date as if New TopCo had provided the Scheme Consideration to that Eligible Shareholder. |
5 | DEALINGS IN ALLKEM SHARES |
5.1 | Allkem Share dealings that are recognised |
(a) | in the case of dealings of the type to be effected using CHESS, the transferee is registered in the Allkem Share Register as the holder of the relevant Allkem Shares as at the Scheme Record Date; and |
(b) | in all other cases, registrable transfers or transmission applications in respect of those dealings, or valid requests in respect of other alternations, are received by the Allkem Share Registry at or before the Scheme Record Date, |
5.2 | Allkem to register transfer and transmission applications |
5.3 | Transfers received after Scheme Record Date not recognised |
5.4 | Allkem to maintain Allkem Share Register to determine entitlements |
(a) | In order to determine entitlements to the Scheme Consideration, Allkem must maintain, or procure the maintenance of, the Allkem Share Register in accordance with this clause 5 until the Scheme Consideration has been paid to Scheme Shareholders and New TopCo has been entered into the Allkem Share Register as the holder of the Scheme Shares. |
(b) | The Allkem Share Register in this form will solely determine entitlements to the Scheme Consideration. |
5.5 | Holding statements no effect from Scheme Record Date |
(a) | All holding statements for Allkem Shares (other than any holding statements (1) in favour of the Sale Nominee with respect to the Ineligible shares or (2) in favour of New TopCo) will cease to have effect as documents of title (or evidence thereof) after the Scheme Record Date. |
(b) | Each entry on the Allkem Share Register at and from the Scheme Record Date (other than those entries in respect of New TopCo or a transfer in accordance with clause 4.4(c) to the Sale Nominee) will cease to have any effect other than as evidence of an entitlement to the Scheme Consideration in respect of the Scheme Shares relating to that entry. |
5.6 | Allkem to provide contact information for Scheme Shareholders |
5.7 | Suspension of trading |
5.8 | Termination of official quotation |
(a) | to ASX, for: |
(i) | removal of Allkem from the official list of ASX; and |
(ii) | termination of the official quotation of Allkem Shares on ASX; |
(b) | to TSX for the delisting of Allkem from TSX with effect on and from the close of trading on the Scheme Effective Date, or such other date as Livent and Allkem may agree, acting reasonably, following consultation with TSX. |
6 | GENERAL PROVISIONS |
6.1 | Allkem giving effect to the Scheme |
6.2 | Scheme Shareholders’ agreements and consents |
(a) | agrees for all purposes to: |
(i) | in the case of Ineligible Overseas Shareholders, the transfer of their Ineligible Shares to the Sale Nominee; |
(ii) | in the case of Eligible Shareholders: |
(A) | become a member of New TopCo; |
(B) | in the case of Eligible Shareholders who are issued Consideration CDIs pursuant to this Scheme, to have their name entered in the records maintained by CDN or its custodian (as applicable) or both, as the holder of CDIs; |
(C) | in the case of Eligible Shareholders who are issued Consideration Shares pursuant to this Scheme, to have their name registered in the New TopCo Share Register as a holder of New TopCo Shares; and |
(D) | be bound by the memorandum of association and articles of association of New TopCo; and |
(iii) | in the case of Eligible Shareholders, the transfer of their Scheme Shares, together with all rights and entitlements attaching to those Scheme Shares, to New TopCo, |
(b) | agrees for all purposes and to the extent permitted by law, that all instructions, notifications or elections made by the Scheme Shareholder or the Sale Nominee to Allkem (binding or deemed to be binding between the Scheme Shareholder and Allkem) relating to Allkem or its securities (except for tax file numbers), including instructions, notifications or elections relating to: |
(i) | whether distributions or dividends are to be paid by cheque or into a specific account; and |
(ii) | notices or other communications from Allkem, |
(c) | agrees to the variation, cancellation or modification of the rights attached to their Scheme Shares constituted by or resulting from, and in accordance with, this Scheme; |
(d) | acknowledges that this Scheme binds Allkem, all Scheme Shareholders (including those who did not attend the Scheme Meeting and those who did not vote, or voted against this Scheme, at the Scheme Meeting) and the Sale Nominee; |
(e) | consents to Allkem, New TopCo and Livent doing all things (including executing all deeds, instruments, transfers or other documents) as may be necessary or desirable to give full effect to this Scheme and the transactions contemplated by it; and |
(f) | acknowledges and agrees that Allkem, as agent of each Scheme Shareholder and of the Sale Nominee, may sub–delegate its functions under this Scheme to any of its directors and officers, jointly and severally, |
6.3 | Scheme Shareholders’ warranties |
(a) | Each Scheme Shareholder and the Sale Nominee is taken to have warranted to Allkem and New TopCo (and, in the case of an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, to the Sale Nominee), and to have appointed and authorised Allkem as its attorney and agent to warrant to New TopCo (and, in the case of an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, to the Sale Nominee), that: |
(i) | all their Allkem Shares (including any rights and entitlements attaching to their Allkem Shares) that are transferred under this Scheme will, at the time of their transfer, be fully paid and free from all: |
(A) | Encumbrances, pledges and interests of third parties of any kind, whether legal or otherwise; and |
(B) | restrictions on transfer of any kind; |
(ii) | they have full power and capacity to transfer their Allkem Shares to New TopCo (or, in the case of Ineligible Overseas Shareholders, to the Sale Nominee), together with any rights and entitlements attaching to those Allkem Shares, under this Scheme; and |
(iii) | as at the Scheme Record Date, they have no existing right to be issued any other Allkem Shares or any other form of securities in Allkem. |
(b) | Allkem undertakes in favour of each Scheme Shareholder (and, in the case of an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, for the Sale Nominee) that it will provide such warranty to New TopCo as agent and attorney of each Scheme Shareholder. |
6.4 | Appointment of Allkem as attorney of Scheme Shareholders and Sale Nominee |
(a) | execute any document or do any other act necessary, expedient or incidental to give full effect to this Scheme and the transactions contemplated by it, including executing and delivering the Scheme Transfer under clause 3.2 and the Ineligible Share Transfer under clause 4.4; and |
(b) | enforce the Deed Poll against New TopCo, |
6.5 | Appointment of New TopCo as agent, attorney and sole proxy in respect of Scheme Shares |
(a) | irrevocably appoints New TopCo as its attorney and agent (and directs New TopCo as its attorney and agent to appoint any of the directors and officers of New TopCo as its sole proxy and, where applicable, corporate representative, of that Eligible Shareholder) to: |
(i) | attend shareholders’ meetings of Allkem; |
(ii) | exercise the votes attaching to the Scheme Shares registered in the name of the Eligible Shareholder; and |
(iii) | sign any Allkem Shareholders’ resolution (whether in person, by proxy or by corporate representative); |
(b) | must take all other action in the capacity of a registered holder of Scheme Shares as New TopCo reasonably directs; |
(c) | undertake not to attend or vote at any shareholders’ meetings of Allkem or sign any Allkem Shareholders’ resolution (whether in person, by proxy or by corporate representative) other than pursuant to clause 6.5(a); and |
(d) | acknowledges and agrees that in exercising the powers conferred by clause 6.5(a), New TopCo and any director, officer or agent nominated by New TopCo may act in the best interests of New TopCo as the intended registered holder of the Scheme Shares. |
(a) | This Scheme binds Allkem, all of the Scheme Shareholders (including those who did not attend the Scheme Meeting and those who did not vote, or voted against this Scheme, at the Scheme Meeting) and the Sale Nominee and, to the extent of any inconsistency, overrides the constitution of Allkem. |
(b) | Any covenant from any Scheme Shareholder or the Sale Nominee in favour of New TopCo or any obligation owed by any Scheme Shareholder or the Sale Nominee to New TopCo will be enforceable by New TopCo against such person directly and, to the extent necessary, may enforce such rights through Allkem as party to the Scheme. |
6.7 | No liability when acting in good faith |
6.8 | Deed Poll |
6.9 | Notices |
(a) | Where a notice, transfer, transmission application, direction or other communication referred to in this Scheme is sent by post to Allkem, it will be deemed to be received on the date (if any) on which it is actually received at Allkem’s registered office or at the Allkem Share Registry and on no other date. |
(b) | The accidental omission to give notice of the Scheme Meeting or the non-receipt of such notice by an Allkem Shareholder will not, unless so ordered by the Court, invalidate the Scheme Meeting or the proceedings of the Scheme Meeting. |
6.10 | Stamp duty |
6.11 | Governing law |
(a) | This Scheme and any dispute arising out of or in connection with the subject matter of this Scheme is governed by the laws of Western Australia. |
(b) | Each party irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia (Western Australian registry) and of the courts competent to determine appeals from that court with respect to any proceedings that may be brought at any time arising out of or in connection with the subject matter of this Scheme. Each party irrevocably waives any objection to the venue of any legal process in these courts on the basis that the process has been brought in any inconvenient forum. |
1. | The name of the Company is [•] plc. |
2. | The Company is a public company limited by shares. |
3. | The Company is a par value company. |
4. | The Company has unrestricted corporate capacity. |
5. | The liability of each member arising from his or her holding of a share is limited to the amount (if any) unpaid on it. |
6. | The share capital of the Company is US$[•] divided into [•] ordinary shares of US$[•] each and [•] preferred shares of US$[•] each. |
| | Table of contents | |||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | |
| | Table of contents | |||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | |
Preliminary |
Definitions and interpretation |
(a) | The meanings of the terms used in these articles are set out below. |
Term | | | Meaning |
Acting Chairperson | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 7.7(d). |
| | ||
affiliate | | | a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, another person. |
| | ||
annual general meeting | | | an annual general meeting of the Company that the Companies Law requires to be held. |
| | ||
Board | | | the directors for the time being of the Company or those directors who are present at a meeting at which there is a quorum. |
| | ||
Business Day | | | has the meaning given to that term in the listing rules of the New York Stock Exchange. |
| | ||
CDI | | | means a CHESS depositary interest that represents a beneficial ownership in a share in the Company registered in the name of CDI Nominee (or in the name of a nominee or custodian who will hold the shares in the Company on CDI Nominee’s behalf). |
| | ||
CDI Nominee | | | means CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty Limited (ACN 071 346 506). |
| | ||
CHESS | | | the Clearing House Electronic Subregister System operated by ASX Settlement Pty Ltd. |
| | ||
Companies Law | | | the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991. |
| | ||
Control, including the terms controlling, controlled by and under common control with | | | the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a person, whether through the ownership of voting shares, by contract or otherwise. A person who is the owner of 20% or more of the outstanding voting shares of any corporation, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity shall be presumed to have control of such entity, in the absence of proof by a preponderance of the evidence to the contrary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a presumption of control shall not apply where such person holds voting shares, in good faith and not for the purpose of circumventing this provision, as an agent, bank, broker, nominee, custodian or trustee for one or more owners who do not individually or as a group have control of such entity. |
| | ||
CREST Order | | | the Companies (Uncertificated Securities) (Jersey) Order 1999, as amended from time to time, including any provisions of or under the Companies Law which alter or replace such regulations. |
Term | | | Meaning |
Default Shares | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 6.2(a). |
| | ||
Derivative Security | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 7.3(f)(3). |
| | ||
Designated Stock Exchange | | | the New York Stock Exchange, the Australian Securities Exchange or any other stock exchange or automated quotation system on which the Company’s securities are then traded. |
| | ||
directors | | | the directors of the Company. |
| | ||
distribution | | | has the meaning given to that expression in Article 114 of the Companies Law. |
| | ||
dividend | | | any dividend (whether interim or final) resolved to be paid on shares pursuant to these articles. |
| | ||
DTC | | | the Depositary Trust Company or any successor company. |
| | ||
DTC Depositary | | | Cede & Co. and/or any other custodian, depositary or nominee of DTC which holds shares under arrangements that facilitate the holding and trading of beneficial interests in ordinary shares in the DTC System. |
| | ||
DTC Proxy | | | in relation to any shares held by the DTC Depositary, any person who is, for the purposes of any general meeting or resolution, appointed a proxy (whether by way of instrument of proxy, power of attorney, mandate or otherwise) by: a) the DTC Depositary; or b) a proxy, attorney or other agent appointed by any other person whose authority is ultimately derived (whether directly or indirectly) from the DTC Depositary. |
| | ||
DTC System | | | the electronic system operated by DTC by which title to securities or interests in securities may be evidenced and transferred in dematerialised form. |
| | ||
Exchange Act | | | the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
| | ||
Exemption Order | | | the Companies (Transfers of Shares – Exemptions) (Jersey) Order 2014 as amended from time to time, including any provisions of or under the Companies Law which alter or replace such regulations. |
| | ||
extraordinary general meeting | | | any general meeting of the Company other than the annual general meeting. |
| | ||
Liabilities | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 11.2. |
| | ||
Listing Rules | | | the listing rules of the Designated Stock Exchange. |
| | ||
Officer | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 11.1. |
| |
Term | | | Meaning |
public announcement | | | disclosure in a press release reported by Dow Jones News Service, Associated Press or a comparable national news service in the United States or in a document publicly filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to sections 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. |
| | ||
Record Time | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 7.4. |
| | ||
Representative | | | in relation to a member that is a body corporate means a person authorised by the body corporate to act as its representative at the meeting. |
| | ||
Seal | | | any common seal, duplicate seal or certificate seal of the Company. |
| | ||
share | | | means shares in the Company. |
| | ||
special resolution | | | a resolution of the Company passed as a special resolution in accordance with the Companies Law. |
| | ||
Statement of Rights | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 2.4. |
| | ||
Transmission Event | | | 1 for a member who is an individual – the member’s death, the member’s bankruptcy, or a member becoming of unsound mind, or a person who, or whose estate, is liable to be dealt with in any way under the laws relating to mental health; and 2 for a member who is a body corporate – the insolvency, bankruptcy or dissolution of the member or the succession by another body corporate to the assets and liabilities of the member. |
| | ||
Uncertificated | | | in relation to a share, means a share title to which is recorded in the register as being held in uncertificated form and title to which, by virtue of the CREST Order, may be transferred by means of a relevant system. |
(b) | A reference in these articles to a partly paid share is a reference to a share on which there is an amount unpaid. |
(c) | A reference in these articles to an amount unpaid on a share includes a reference to any amount of the issue price which is unpaid. |
(d) | A reference in these articles to a call or an amount called on a share includes a reference to a sum that, by the terms of issue of a share, becomes payable on issue or at a fixed date. |
(e) | Except where a special resolution or another percentage is specified, a reference to a resolution or ordinary resolution of the Company is a reference to a resolution passed by a majority of votes cast by the members present at a general meeting. |
(f) | A reference in these articles to a member for the purposes of a meeting of members is a reference to a registered holder of shares as at the relevant Record Time. |
(g) | A reference in these articles to a member present at a general meeting is a reference to a member present in person, electronically in accordance with article 7.5(d) or by proxy, attorney or Representative. |
(h) | A chairperson or deputy chairperson appointed under these articles may be referred to as chairman or chairwoman, or deputy chairman or chairwoman, or as chair, if applicable. |
(i) | A reference in these articles to a person holding or occupying a particular office or position is a reference to any person who occupies or performs the duties of that office or position. |
(j) | A reference to a document being ‘signed’ or to ‘signature’ includes that document being executed under hand or under seal or by any other method and, in the case of a communication in electronic form, includes the document being authenticated in accordance with the Companies Law or any other method approved by the Board. |
(k) | Unless the contrary intention appears, in these articles: |
(1) | the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular; |
(2) | words that refer to any gender include all genders; |
(3) | words used to refer to persons generally include natural persons as well as bodies corporate, bodies politic, partnerships, joint ventures, associations, boards, groups or other bodies (whether or not the body is incorporated); |
(4) | a reference to a person includes that person’s successors and legal personal representatives; |
(5) | a reference to a statute or regulation, or a provision of any of them includes all statutes, regulations or provisions amending, consolidating or replacing them, and a reference to a statute includes all regulations, proclamations, ordinances and by-laws issued under that statute; |
(6) | a reference to the Listing Rules includes any variation, consolidation, amendment or replacement of those rules and is to be taken to be subject to any applicable waiver or exemption; and |
(7) | where a word or phrase is given a particular meaning, other parts of speech and grammatical forms of that word or phrase have corresponding meanings. |
(l) | Specifying anything in these articles after the words ‘including’, ‘includes’ or ‘for example’ or similar expressions does not limit what else is included unless there is express wording to the contrary. |
(m) | In these articles, headings and bold type are only for convenience and do not affect the meaning of these articles. |
Standard Table not to apply |
Exercising powers |
(a) | The Company may, in any way the Companies Law permits: |
(1) | exercise any power; |
(2) | take any action; or |
(3) | engage in any conduct or procedure; |
(b) | Where these articles provide that a person ‘may’ do a particular act or thing, the act or thing may be done at the person’s discretion. |
(c) | Where these articles confer a power to do a particular act or thing, the power is, unless the contrary intention appears, to be taken as including a power exercisable in the same way and subject to the same conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend or vary that act or thing. |
(d) | Where these articles confer a power to do a particular act or thing, the power may be exercised from time to time and may be exercised subject to conditions. |
(e) | Where these articles confer a power to do a particular act or thing concerning particular matters, the power is, unless the contrary intention appears, to be taken to include a power to do that act or thing as to only some of those matters or as to a particular class of those matters, and to make different provision concerning different matters or different classes of matters. |
(f) | Where these articles confer a power to make appointments to an office or position (except the power to appoint a director under article 8.1(b)), the power is, unless the contrary intention appears, to be taken to include a power: |
(1) | to appoint a person to act in the office or position until a person is formally appointed to the office or position; |
(2) | to remove or suspend any person appointed (without prejudice to any rights or obligations under any contract between the person and the Company); and |
(3) | to appoint another person temporarily in the place of any person removed or suspended or in the place of any sick or absent holder of the office or position. |
(g) | Where these articles give power to a person to delegate a function or power: |
(1) | the delegation may be concurrent with, or (except in the case of a delegation by the Board) to the exclusion of, the performance or exercise of that function or power by the person; |
(2) | the delegation may be either general or limited in any way provided in the terms of delegation; |
(3) | the delegation need not be to a specified person but may be to any person holding, occupying or performing the duties of a specified office or position; |
(4) | the delegation may include the power to delegate; and |
(5) | where performing or exercising that function or power depends on that person’s opinion, belief or state of mind about a matter, that function or power may be performed or exercised by the delegate on the delegate’s opinion, belief or state of mind about that matter. |
Currency |
Share capital |
Share capital and share issues |
(a) | The share capital of the Company is as specified in the Memorandum of Association and the shares of the Company shall have the rights and be subject to the conditions contained in these articles and, to the extent applicable, in the Statement of Rights relating to preferred shares of any class. |
(b) | Subject to these articles, the Board may, from time to time in its discretion: |
(1) | issue, allot or grant options for, or otherwise dispose of, shares in the Company; and |
(2) | decide: |
(A) | the persons to whom shares are issued or options are granted; |
(B) | the terms on which shares are issued or options are granted; and |
(C) | the rights and restrictions attached to those shares or options. |
Rights attaching to ordinary shares |
(a) | As regards income – Each ordinary share confers on the holder thereof the right to receive such profits of the Company available for distribution as the Board may declare after any payment to the members holding shares of any other class other than ordinary shares of any amount then payable in accordance with the relevant Statement of Rights or other terms of issue of that class. |
(b) | As regards capital – If the Company is wound up, the holder of an ordinary share is entitled, following payment to the members holding shares of any other class other than ordinary shares of all amounts then payable to them in accordance with the relevant Statement of Rights or other terms of issue of that class, to repayment of the stated amount of the capital paid up thereon and thereafter any surplus assets of the Company then remaining shall be distributed pari passu among the holders of the ordinary shares in proportion to the amounts paid up thereon. |
(c) | As regards voting – At any general meeting of the Company and any separate class meeting of the holders of ordinary shares, every person who was a holder of ordinary shares at the Record Time and who is present at such meeting has one vote for every ordinary share of which such person was the holder as of the Record Time. |
(d) | As regards redemption – the ordinary shares are not redeemable, unless issued as redeemable or converted into redeemable ordinary shares pursuant to article 2.6. |
Series or classes of preferred shares |
Rights of preferred shares |
(a) | the series or class to which each preferred share shall belong, such series or class to be designated with a series or class number and, if the Board so determines, title; |
(b) | details of any dividends payable in respect of the relevant series or class, if any, including whether such dividends will be cumulative or noncumulative, the dividend rate of such series or class, and the dates and preferences of dividends on such series or class; |
(c) | details of rights attaching to shares of the relevant series or class to receive a return of capital on a winding up of the Company; |
(d) | details of the voting rights attaching to shares of the relevant series or class (which may provide, without limitation, that each preferred share shall have more than one vote on a poll at any general meeting of the Company); |
(e) | a statement as to whether shares of the relevant series or class are redeemable (either at the option of the holder and/or the Company) and, if so, on what terms such shares are redeemable (including, and only if so determined by the Board, the amount for which such shares shall be redeemed (or a method or formula for determining the same) and the date on which they shall be redeemed); |
(f) | a statement as to whether shares of the relevant series or class are convertible into, or exchangeable for, shares of any other class or classes or of any other series of the same or any other class or classes of shares, or any other security, of the Company or any other person (in each case, either at the option of the holder and/or the Company) and, if so, on what rates or terms such shares are convertible or exchangeable; |
(g) | the right, if any, to subscribe for or to purchase any securities of the Company or any other person; |
(h) | any other designations, powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other rights, obligations and restrictions, if any, attaching to preferred shares of any class or series as the Board may determine in its discretion; and/or |
(i) | the price at which shares of the relevant series or class shall be issued. |
Effect of Statement of Rights |
(a) | it is binding on members and the Board as if contained in these articles; |
(b) | it must be filed on behalf of the Company with the Registrar of Companies in Jersey in accordance with the Companies Law; |
(c) | the provisions of article 2.11 apply to any variation or abrogation thereof that may be effected by the Company or the Board; and |
(d) | upon the redemption of a preferred share (if it is redeemable) pursuant to the Statement of Rights relating thereto, the holder thereof ceases to be entitled to any rights in respect thereof and accordingly such holder’s name must be removed from the register of members and the share must thereupon be cancelled. |
Redeemable shares |
(a) | issue; or |
(b) | convert existing non-redeemable shares, whether issued or not, into, shares that are to be redeemed, or are liable to be redeemed, either in accordance with their terms or at the option of the Company and/or at the option of the holder; provided that an issued non-redeemable share may only be converted into a redeemable share pursuant to article 2.6(b) with the agreement of the applicable holder (which agreement shall be deemed to exist with respect to any non-redeemable shares tendered by such holder for conversion, repurchase, buy back or redemption and regardless of whether or not such holder is aware that the Company is the purchaser of such shares in such transaction) or pursuant to a special resolution. |
Fractions of shares |
(a) | Subject to the Companies Law, the Company may, in the Board’s discretion, issue fractions of a share of any class. |
(b) | A fraction of a share shall be subject to and carry the corresponding fraction of liabilities (whether with respect to calls or otherwise), limitations, preferences, privileges, qualifications, restrictions, rights and other attributes of a share of that class of shares. |
Alteration of share capital |
(a) | making cash payments; |
(b) | determining that fractions may be disregarded to adjust the rights of all members; |
(c) | appointing a trustee to deal with any fractions on behalf of members; and |
(d) | rounding down or rounding up each fractional entitlement to the nearest whole share. |
Purchase of shares |
Conversion or reclassification of shares |
(a) | Subject to article 2.11 and the provisions of the Companies Law, the Company may by special resolution convert or reclassify shares from one class to another. |
(b) | Notwithstanding article 2.11 but subject to the Companies Law, the Board may convert or reclassify any previously classified but unissued shares of any existing class from time to time in one or more existing classes of shares without the approval of members of the Company. |
Variation of class rights |
(a) | The rights attached to any class of shares may, unless their terms of issue state otherwise, be varied by a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of shares of the class. |
(b) | The provisions of these articles relating to general meetings apply, with necessary changes, to separate class meetings as if they were general meetings. |
(c) | The rights conferred on the holders of any class of shares are to be taken as not having been varied by the creation or issue of further shares ranking ahead, after or pari passu with them, unless the terms of issue provide otherwise. |
(d) | The rights conferred upon the holders of ordinary shares are to be taken as not having been varied by the creation, issue, redemption or conversion of any preferred shares. |
Shareholder rights plan |
(a) | The Board is hereby authorised to establish a shareholder rights plan including approving the execution of any document relating to the adoption and/or implementation of a rights plan. A rights plan may be in such form and may be subject to such terms and conditions as the Board shall determine in its absolute discretion. |
(b) | The Board is hereby authorised to grant rights to subscribe for shares of the Company in accordance with a rights plan. |
(c) | The Board may, in accordance with a rights plan, exercise any power under such rights plan (including a power relating to the issuance, redemption or exchange of rights or shares) on a basis that excludes one or more members, including a member who has acquired or may acquire a significant interest in or control of the Company. |
(d) | The Board is authorised to exercise the powers under this article 2.12 for any purpose that the Board, in its discretion, deems reasonable and appropriate, including, without limitation, to ensure that: |
(1) | any process which may result in an acquisition of a significant interest or change of control of the Company is conducted in an orderly manner; |
(2) | all holders of ordinary shares will be treated fairly and in a similar manner; |
(3) | any potential acquisition of a significant interest or change of control of the Company which would be unlikely to treat all members of the Company fairly and in a similar manner would be prevented; |
(4) | the use of abusive tactics by any person in connection with any potential acquisition of a significant interest or change of control of the Company would be prevented; |
(5) | an optimum price for shares would be received by or on behalf of all members of the Company; |
(6) | the success of the Company would be promoted for the benefit of its members as a whole; |
(7) | the long-term interests of the Company, its employees, its members and its business would be safeguarded; |
(8) | the Company would not suffer serious economic harm; |
(9) | the Board has additional time to gather relevant information or pursue appropriate strategies; or |
(10) | all or any of the above. |
Joint holders of shares |
(a) | they are liable individually as well as jointly for all payments, including calls, in respect of the share; |
(b) | subject to article 2.13(a), on the death of any one of them the survivor is the only person the Company will recognise as having any title to the share; |
(c) | any one of them may give effective receipts for any dividend, bonus, interest or other distribution or payment in respect of the share; and |
(d) | except where persons are jointly entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event, the Company may, but is not required to, register more than four (4) persons as joint holders of the share. |
Equitable and other claims |
(a) | recognise a person as holding a share on trust, even if the Company has notice of a trust; or |
(b) | recognise, or be bound by, any equitable, contingent, future or partial claim to or interest in a share by any other person, except an absolute right of ownership in the registered holder, even if the Company has notice of that claim or interest. |
Issue of share certificates |
(a) | Subject to article 2.15(e), upon being entered in the register of members as the holder of a share, a member is entitled: |
(1) | without payment, to one certificate for all the shares of each class held by that member (and, upon transferring a part of the member’s holding of shares of any class, to a certificate for the balance of that holding); and |
(2) | upon payment of such reasonable sum as the directors may determine for every certificate after the first, to several certificates each for one or more of that member’s shares. |
(b) | Every certificate shall specify the number, class and distinguishing numbers (if any) of the shares to which it relates and whether they are fully paid or partly paid up. A certificate may be executed under seal or executed in such other manner as the directors determine and the Companies Law permits. |
(c) | The Company shall not be bound to issue more than one certificate for shares held jointly by several persons and delivery of a certificate for a share to one joint holder shall be a sufficient delivery to all of them. |
(d) | If a share certificate is defaced, worn-out, lost or destroyed, it may be renewed on such terms (if any) as to: |
(1) | evidence; |
(2) | indemnity; |
(3) | payment of the expenses reasonably incurred by the Company in investigating the evidence; and |
(4) | payment of a reasonable fee, if any, for issuing a replacement share certificate, |
(e) | Subject to article 2.15(f), at any time the relevant shares are listed on the Designated Stock Exchange (provided that the Designated Stock Exchange remains an ‘approved stock exchange’ (as defined in the Exemption Order)), the Company shall not be required to (although may, in its absolute discretion choose to), produce a share certificate in accordance with this article 2.15. |
(f) | Following a written request at any time from a member to the Company requesting a share certificate in respect of shares held by that member, the Company shall, within two (2) months of receipt by the Company of that written request, complete and have ready for delivery the certificate of such shares in respect of which the request was made, unless the conditions of allotment of the shares otherwise provide. |
Calls, forfeiture, indemnities, lien and surrender |
Calls |
(a) | Subject to the terms on which any shares are issued, the Board may: |
(1) | make calls on the members for any amount unpaid on their shares which is not by the terms of issue of those shares made payable at fixed times; and |
(2) | on the issue of shares, differentiate between members as to the amount of calls to be paid and the time for payment. |
(b) | The Board may require a call to be paid by instalments. |
(c) | The Board must send members notice of a call at least fourteen (14) days before the amount called is due, specifying the amount of the call, the time for payment and the manner in which payment must be made. |
(d) | Each member must pay the amount called to the Company by the time and in the manner specified for payment. |
(e) | A call is taken to have been made when the resolution of the Board authorising the call is passed. |
(f) | The Board may revoke a call or extend the time for payment. |
(g) | A call is valid even if a member for any reason does not receive notice of the call. |
(h) | If an amount called on a share is not paid in full by the time specified for payment, the person who owes the amount must pay: |
(1) | interest on the unpaid part of the amount from the date payment is due to the date payment is made, at a rate determined under article 3.7; and |
(2) | any costs, expenses or damages the Company incurs due to the failure to pay or late payment. |
(i) | Any amount unpaid on a share that, by the terms of issue of the share, becomes payable on issue or at a fixed date: |
(1) | is treated for the purposes of these articles as if that amount were payable under a call duly made and notified; and |
(2) | must be paid on the date on which it is payable under the terms of issue of the share. |
(j) | The Board may, to the extent the law permits, waive or compromise all or part of any payment due to the Company under the terms of issue of a share or under this article 3.1. |
Proceedings to recover calls |
(a) | In a proceeding to recover a call, or an amount payable due to the failure to pay or late payment of a call, proof that: |
(1) | the name of the defendant is entered in the register as the holder or one of the holders of the share on which the call is claimed; |
(2) | the resolution making the call is recorded in the minute book; and |
(3) | notice of the call was given to the defendant complying with these articles, |
(b) | In article 3.2(a), defendant includes a person against whom the Company alleges a set-off or counterclaim, and a proceeding to recover a call or an amount is to be interpreted accordingly. |
Payments in advance of calls |
(a) | The Board may accept from a member the whole or a part of the amount unpaid on a share even though no part of that amount has been called. |
(b) | The Board may authorise payment by the Company of interest on an amount accepted under article 3.3(a), until the amount becomes payable, at a rate agreed between the Board and the member paying the amount. |
(c) | The Board may repay to a member any amount accepted under article 3.3(a). |
Forfeiting partly paid shares |
(a) | If a member fails to pay the whole of a call or an instalment of a call by the time specified for payment, the Board may serve a notice on that member: |
(1) | requiring payment of the unpaid part of the call or instalment, together with any interest that has accrued and all costs, expenses or damages that the Company has incurred due to the failure to pay; |
(2) | specifying a further time (at least fourteen (14) days after the date of the notice) by which, and the manner in which, the amount payable under article 3.4(a)(1) must be paid; and |
(3) | stating that if the whole of the amount payable under article 3.4(a)(1) is not paid by the time and in the manner specified, the shares on which the call was made will be liable to be forfeited. |
(b) | If a member does not comply with a notice served under article 3.4(a), the Board may by resolution forfeit any share concerning which the notice was given at any time after the day named in the notice and before the payment required by the notice is made. |
(c) | A forfeiture under article 3.4(b) includes all dividends, interest and other amounts payable by the Company on the forfeited share and not actually paid before the forfeiture. |
(d) | Where a share has been forfeited: |
(1) | notice of the resolution must be given to the member in whose name the share stood immediately before the forfeiture; and |
(2) | an entry of the forfeiture, with the date, must be made in the register of members. |
(e) | Failure to give the notice or to make the entry required under article 3.4(d) does not invalidate the forfeiture. |
(f) | A forfeited share becomes the property of the Company and the Board may sell, reissue or otherwise dispose of the share as it thinks fit and, in the case of reissue or other disposal, with or without crediting as paid up any amount paid on the share by any former holder. |
(g) | A person whose shares have been forfeited ceases to be a member as to the forfeited shares, but must, unless the Board decides otherwise, pay to the Company: |
(1) | all calls, instalments, interest, costs, expenses and damages owing on the shares at the time of the forfeiture; and |
(2) | interest on the unpaid part of the amount payable under article 3.4(g)(1), from the date of the forfeiture to the date of payment, at a rate determined under article 3.7. |
(h) | The forfeiture of a share extinguishes all interest in, and all claims and demands against the Company relating to, the forfeited share and, subject to article 3.6(h), all other rights attached to the share. |
(i) | The Board may: |
(1) | exempt a share from all or part of this article 3.4; |
(2) | waive or compromise all or part of any payment due to the Company under this article 3.4; and |
(3) | before a forfeited share has been sold, reissued or otherwise disposed of, cancel the forfeiture on the conditions it decides. |
Lien on shares |
(a) | The Company has a first lien on: |
(1) | each partly paid share for all unpaid calls and instalments due on that share; and |
(2) | each share for any amounts the Company is required by law to pay and has paid in respect of that share. |
(b) | The Company’s lien on a share extends to all dividends, interest and other amounts payable on the share and to the proceeds of sale of the share. |
(c) | The Board may sell a share on which the Company has a lien as it thinks fit where: |
(1) | an amount for which a lien exists under this article 3.5 is presently payable; and |
(2) | the Company has given the registered holder a written notice, at least fourteen (14) days before the date of the sale, stating and demanding payment of that amount. |
(d) | The Board may do anything necessary or desirable to protect any lien, charge or other right to which the Company is entitled under these articles or a law. |
(e) | When the Company registers a transfer of shares on which the Company has a lien without giving the transferee notice of its claim, the Company’s lien is released so far as it relates to amounts owing by the transferor or any predecessor in title. |
(f) | The Board may: |
(1) | exempt a share from all or part of this article 3.5; and |
(2) | waive or compromise all or part of any payment due to the Company under this article 3.5. |
Sale, reissue or other disposal of shares by the Company |
(a) | A reference in this article 3.6 to a sale of a share by the Company is a reference to any sale, reissue or other disposal of a share under article 3.4(f) or article 3.5(c). |
(b) | When the Company sells a share, the Company may: |
(1) | receive the purchase money or consideration given for the share; |
(2) | effect a transfer of the share or execute or appoint a person to execute, on behalf of the former holder, a transfer of the share; and |
(3) | register as the holder of the share the person to whom the share is sold. |
(c) | A person to whom the Company sells shares need not take any steps to investigate the regularity or validity of the sale, or to see how the purchase money or consideration on the sale is applied. That person’s title to the shares is not affected by any irregularity by the Company in relation to the sale. A sale of the share by the Company is valid even if a Transmission Event occurs to the member before the sale. |
(d) | The only remedy of a person who suffers a loss because of a sale of a share by the Company is a claim for damages against the Company, but the Company shall not be liable for a loss caused by the price at which the shares are sold in good faith. |
(e) | The proceeds of a sale of shares by the Company must be applied in paying: |
(1) | first, the expenses of the sale; |
(2) | secondly, all amounts payable (whether presently or not) by the former holder to the Company, |
(f) | Until the proceeds of a sale of a share sold by the Company are claimed or otherwise disposed of according to law, the Board may invest or use the proceeds in any other way for the benefit of the Company. |
(g) | The Company is not required to pay interest on money payable to a former holder under this article 3.6. |
(h) | On completion of a sale, reissue or other disposal of a share under article 3.4(f), the rights which attach to the share which were extinguished under article 3.4(h) revive. |
(i) | A written statement by a director or secretary of the Company that a share in the Company has been: |
(1) | duly forfeited under article 3.4(b); |
(2) | duly sold, reissued or otherwise disposed of under article 3.4(f); or |
(3) | duly sold under article 3.5(c), |
Interest payable by member |
(a) | For the purposes of articles 3.1(h)(1) and 3.4(g)(2), the rate of interest payable to the Company is: |
(1) | if the Board has fixed a rate, that rate; or |
(2) | in any other case, a rate per annum 2% higher than the rate prescribed in respect of unpaid judgments in the Royal Court of Jersey. |
(b) | Interest accrues daily and may be capitalised monthly or at such other intervals the Board decides. |
Distributions |
Dividends |
(a) | Subject to each Statement of Rights and the provisions of the Companies Law, the Board may pay any dividends from time to time as the Board may determine, including any interim dividends. |
(b) | The Board may rescind a decision to pay a dividend, before the payment date in its sole discretion. |
(c) | The Board may pay any dividend required to be paid under the terms of issue of a share. |
(d) | The Board may pay half-yearly, quarterly or at other suitable intervals to be settled by them any dividend which may be payable at a fixed rate. |
(e) | Paying a dividend does not require confirmation or approval at a general meeting. |
(f) | Subject to any rights or restrictions attached to any shares or class of shares: |
(1) | all dividends must be paid equally on all shares, except that a partly paid share confers an entitlement only to the proportion of the dividend which the amount paid (not credited) on the share is of the total amounts paid and payable (excluding amounts credited); |
(2) | for the purposes of article 4.1(f)(1), unless the Board decides otherwise, an amount paid on a share in advance of a call is to be taken as not having been paid until it becomes payable; and |
(3) | interest is not payable by the Company on any dividend or any amounts payable therewith. |
(g) | The Board may fix a record date for a dividend. |
(h) | A dividend in respect of a share must be paid, subject to the rules of any Designated Stock Exchange (including any rules relating to the settlement of transfers of securities), to the person who is registered, or entitled under articles 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 to be registered, as the holder of the share: |
(1) | where the Board has fixed a record date in respect of the dividend, on that date; or |
(2) | where the Board has not fixed a record date in respect of that dividend, on the date fixed for payment of the dividend, |
(i) | When resolving to pay a dividend, the Board may direct payment of the dividend from any available source permitted by law, including: |
(1) | wholly or partly by the distribution of specific assets, including paid-up shares or other securities of the Company or of another body corporate, either generally or to specific members; and |
(2) | to particular members wholly or partly out of any particular fund or reserve or out of profits derived from any particular source, and to the other members wholly or partly out of any other particular fund or reserve or out of profits derived from any other particular source. |
(j) | Where a person is entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event, the Board may, but need not, retain any dividends payable on that share until that person becomes registered as the holder of that share or transfers it. |
(k) | The Board may retain from any dividend payable to a member any amount presently payable by the member to the Company and apply the amount retained to the amount owing. |
(l) | The Board may decide the method of payment of any dividend or other amount in respect of a share. Different methods of payment may apply to different members or groups of members (such as overseas members). Without limiting any other method of payment which the Company may adopt, payment in respect of a share may be made: |
(1) | by such electronic or other means approved by the Board directly to an account (of a type approved by the Board) nominated in writing by the member or the joint holders; or |
(2) | by cheque sent to the address of the member shown in the register of members or, in the case of joint holders, to the address shown in the register of members of any of the joint holders, or to such other address as the member or any of the joint holders in writing direct. |
(m) | A cheque sent under article 4.1(l): |
(1) | may be made payable to bearer or to the order of the member to whom it is sent or any other person the member directs; and |
(2) | is sent at the member’s risk. |
(n) | If the Board decides that payments will be made by electronic transfer into an account (of a type approved by the Board) nominated by a member, but no such account is nominated by the member or an electronic transfer into a nominated account is rejected or refunded, the Company may credit the amount payable to an account of the Company to be held until the member nominates a valid account. |
(o) | Where a member does not have a registered address or the Company believes that a member is not known at the member’s registered address or cheques have been returned undelivered or other payment methods have failed on more than one occasion, the Company may credit an amount payable in respect of the member’s shares to an account of the Company to be held until the member claims the amount payable or nominates a valid account. |
(p) | An amount credited to an account under articles 4.1(n) or 4.1(o) is to be treated as having been paid to the member at the time it is credited to that account. The Company will not be a trustee of the money and no interest will accrue on the money. The money may be used for the benefit of the Company until claimed or otherwise disposed of according to applicable law. |
(q) | If a cheque for an amount payable under article 4.1(l) is not presented for payment for at least eleven (11) calendar months after issue or an amount is held in an account under articles 4.1(n) or 4.1(o) for at least eleven (11) calendar months, the Board may stop payment on the cheque and invest or otherwise make use of the amount for the benefit of the Company until claimed or otherwise disposed of according to applicable law. |
(r) | A dividend that remains unclaimed for a period of ten (10) years after it became due for payment shall be forfeited to, and shall cease to remain owing by, the Company. |
(s) | Provided the directors act reasonably and in accordance with the Companies Law, they shall not incur any personal liability to the holders of shares conferring a preference for any damage that they may suffer by reason of the payment of an interim dividend on any shares having deferred or non-preferred rights. |
Capitalising profits |
(a) | Subject to: |
(1) | any rights or restrictions attached to any shares or class of shares; and |
(2) | any special resolution of the Company; |
(3) | forming part of the undivided profits of the Company; |
(4) | representing profits arising from an ascertained accretion to capital or a revaluation of the assets of the Company; |
(5) | arising from the realisation of any assets of the Company; or |
(6) | otherwise available for distribution as a dividend. |
(b) | The Board may resolve that all or any part of the capitalised amount is to be applied: |
(1) | in paying up in full, at an issue price decided by the Board, any unissued shares in or other securities of the Company; |
(2) | in paying up any amounts unpaid on shares or other securities held by the members; |
(3) | partly as specified in article 4.2(b)(1) and partly as specified in article 4.2(b)(2); or |
(4) | any other method permitted by law. |
(c) | Articles 4.1(f), 4.1(g), 4.1(h), and 4.1(s) apply, so far as they can and with any necessary changes, to capitalising an amount under this article 4.2 as if references in those articles to: |
(1) | a dividend were references to capitalising an amount; and |
(2) | a record date were references to the date the Board resolves to capitalise the amount under this article 4.2. |
(d) | Where the terms of options (existing at the date the resolution referred to in article 4.2(b) is passed) entitle the holder to an issue of bonus shares under this article 4.2, the Board may in determining the number of unissued shares to be so issued, allow in an appropriate manner for the future issue of bonus shares to options holders. |
Ancillary powers |
(a) | To give effect to any resolution to reduce the capital of the Company, to satisfy a dividend as set out in article 4.1(i)(1) or to capitalise any amount under article 4.2, the Board may settle as it thinks expedient any difficulty that arises in making the distribution or capitalisation and, in particular: |
(1) | make cash payments in cases where members are entitled to fractions of shares or other securities; |
(2) | decide that amounts or fractions of less than a particular value decided by the Board may be disregarded to adjust the rights of all parties; |
(3) | fix the value for distribution of any specific assets; |
(4) | pay cash or issue shares or other securities to any member to adjust the rights of all parties; |
(5) | vest any of those specific assets, cash, shares or other securities in a trustee on trust for the persons entitled to the distribution or capitalised amount; and |
(6) | authorise any person to make, on behalf of all the members entitled to any specific assets, cash, shares or other securities as a result of the distribution or capitalisation, an agreement with the Company or another person which provides, as appropriate, for the distribution or issue to them of shares or other securities credited as fully paid up or for payment by the Company on their behalf of the amounts or any part of the amounts remaining unpaid on their existing shares or other securities by applying their respective proportions of the amount resolved to be distributed or capitalised. |
(b) | Any agreement made under an authority referred to in article 4.3(a)(6) is effective and binds all members concerned. |
(c) | If a distribution, transfer or issue of specific assets, shares or securities to a particular member or members is, in the Board’s discretion, considered impracticable or would give rise to parcels of securities that do not constitute a marketable parcel, the Board may make a cash payment to those members or allocate the assets, shares or securities to a trustee to be sold on behalf of, and for the benefit of, those members, instead of making the distribution, transfer or issue to those members. Any proceeds receivable by members under this article 4.3(c) will be net of expenses incurred by the Company and trustee in selling the relevant assets, shares or securities. |
(d) | If the Company distributes to members (either generally or to specific members) securities in the Company or in another body corporate or trust (whether as a dividend or otherwise and whether or not for value), each of those members appoints the Company as such member’s agent to do anything needed to give effect to that distribution, including agreeing to become a member of that other body corporate. |
Reserves |
(a) | The Board may set aside out of the Company’s profits any reserves or provisions it decides. |
(b) | The Board may appropriate to the Company’s profits any amount previously set aside as a reserve or provision. |
(c) | Setting aside an amount as a reserve or provision does not require the Board to keep the amount separate from the Company’s other assets or prevent the amount being used in the Company’s business or being invested as the Board decides. |
Carrying forward profits |
Transfer of shares |
Form of transfer |
(a) | Subject to the following articles about the transfer of shares, a member may transfer any certificated shares or, Uncertificated shares in accordance with the CREST Order, to another person by completing an instrument of transfer, in a common form or in a form approved by the directors, executed: |
(1) | where the shares are fully paid, by or on behalf of that member; and |
(2) | where the shares are partly paid, by or on behalf of that member and the transferee. |
(b) | Subject to the provisions of the CREST Order the transferor of a share is deemed to remain the holder until the name of the transferee is entered in the register in respect of it. |
Transfers of uncertificated shares |
(a) | The Company shall register the transfer of any shares held in Uncertificated form by means of a relevant system in accordance with the Companies Law and the CREST Order and the rules of the relevant system. |
(b) | The Board may, in its absolute discretion, refuse to register any transfer of an Uncertificated share where permitted by these articles, the Companies Law and the CREST Order. |
Transfers of certificated shares |
(a) | An instrument of transfer of a certificated share may be in any usual form or in any other form which the Board may approve and shall be signed by or on behalf of the transferor and (except in the case of a fully paid share) by or on behalf of the transferee. |
(b) | The Board may, in its absolute discretion, refuse to register any instrument of transfer of a certificated share: |
(1) | which is not fully paid up but, in the case of a class of shares which has been admitted to trading on the Designated Stock Exchange, not so as to prevent dealings in those shares from taking place on an open and proper basis; |
(2) | on which the Company has a lien; or |
(3) | as otherwise required by applicable law. |
(c) | The Board may also refuse to register any instrument of transfer of a certificated share unless it is: |
(1) | left at the registered office of the Company, or at such other place as the Board may decide, for registration; |
(2) | accompanied by the certificate for the shares to be transferred and such other evidence (if any) as the Board may reasonably require to prove the title of the intending transferor or his right to transfer the shares; and |
(3) | in respect of only one class of shares. |
Power to suspend registration |
(a) | The Board may suspend registration of the transfer of shares at such times and for such periods (not exceeding 30 days in any calendar year) as it determines. |
(b) | The registration of transfers of shares or of transfers of any class of shares may be suspended at such times and for such periods (not exceeding 30 days in any year) as the Board may determine in its discretion. Unless otherwise permitted by the CREST Order, the Company may not close any register relating to a participating security without the consent of the approved operator of the relevant system. |
Fee, if any, payable for registration |
(a) | If the Board so decides, the Company may charge a reasonable fee for the registration of any instrument of transfer or other document relating to the title to a share. |
Company may retain instrument of transfer |
(a) | The Company shall be entitled to retain any instrument of transfer which is registered; but an instrument of transfer which the Board refuses to register shall be returned to the person lodging it when notice of the refusal is given. |
Transmission of shares |
(a) | Subject to article 5.7(c), where a member dies, the only persons the Company will recognise as having any title to the member’s shares or any benefits accruing on those shares are: |
(1) | where the deceased was a sole holder, the legal personal representative of the deceased; and |
(2) | where the deceased was a joint holder, the survivor or survivors. |
(b) | Article 5.7(a) does not release the estate of a deceased member from any liability on a share, whether that share was held by the deceased solely or jointly with other persons. |
(c) | The Board may register a transfer of shares signed by a member before a Transmission Event even though the Company has notice of the Transmission Event. |
(d) | A person who becomes entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event may, on producing such evidence as the Board requires to prove that person’s entitlement to the share, choose: |
(1) | to be registered as the holder of the share by signing and giving the Company a written notice stating that choice; or |
(2) | to nominate some other person to be registered as the transferee of the share by executing or effecting in some other way a transfer of the share to that other person. |
(e) | The provisions of these articles concerning the right to transfer shares and the registration of transfers of shares apply, so far as they can and with any necessary changes, to a notice or transfer under article 5.7(d) as if the relevant Transmission Event had not occurred and the notice or transfer were executed or effected by the registered holder of the share. |
(f) | Where two (2) or more persons are jointly entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event they will, on being registered as the holders of the share, be taken to hold the share as joint tenants and article 2.13 will apply to them. |
Disclosure of interests |
Tracing notices |
(a) | The Company may give notice to any person whom the Company knows or has reasonable cause to believe: |
(1) | to hold an interest (as defined in article 6.2(i)(4)) in the Company’s shares (of a class of shares admitted to trading); or |
(2) | to have held an interest in the Company’s shares (of a class of shares admitted to trading) at any time during the three (3) years immediately preceding the date on which on which the notice is issued. |
(b) | The notice may require the person: |
(1) | to confirm that such person holds such an interest in the Company’s shares or (as the case may be) to state whether or not it is the case, and |
(2) | if such person holds, or has during that time held, any such interest, to give such further information as may be required in accordance with the following provisions of this article 6.1. |
(c) | The notice may require the person to whom it is addressed to give particulars of the person’s own present or past interest in the Company’s shares held by such person at any time during the three (3) year period mentioned above. |
(d) | The notice may require the person to whom it is addressed, where: |
(1) | such person’s interest is a present interest and another interest in the shares subsists, or |
(2) | another interest in the shares subsisted during the three (3) year period mentioned above at a time when such person’s interest subsisted, to give, to the best of such person’s knowledge, such particulars with respect to that other interest as are required by the notice. |
(e) | The particulars referred to in articles 6.1(c) and 6.1(d) include: |
(1) | the identity of any person who holds an interest in the shares in question; and |
(2) | the terms of any agreement or arrangement to which any person who holds an interest in such shares is or was party: |
(A) | relating to the exercise of any right conferred by the shares or the acquisition of any interest in the shares; or |
(B) | which constitutes a Derivative Security. |
(f) | The notice may require the person to whom it is addressed, where the person’s interest is a past interest, to give (to the best of such person’s knowledge) particulars of the identity of the person who held that interest immediately upon the person ceasing to hold it. |
(g) | The information required by the notice must be given within such reasonable time as may be specified in the notice. |
Failure to Respond |
(a) | If a member, or any other person appearing to have an interest in shares held by that member, has been given a notice under article 6.1 and has failed in relation to any shares (the Default Shares) to give the Company the information thereby required within three (3) Business Days from the time reasonably specified in the notice, the following sanctions shall apply, unless the Board otherwise determines in relation to the Default Shares: |
(1) | the member shall not be entitled in respect of the Default Shares to be present or to vote (either in person or by representative or proxy) at any general meeting or at any separate meeting of the holders of any class of shares or on any poll, or to exercise any other right conferred by membership in respect of the Default Shares in relation to any such meeting or poll; |
(2) | any dividend (or other distribution) payable in respect of the Default Shares shall be withheld by the Company (without interest) and the member shall not be entitled to elect to receive shares instead of any such dividend (or other distribution); and |
(3) | no transfer, other than an excepted transfer, of any shares held by the member may be registered unless: |
(i) | the member is not in default as regards supplying the information required; and |
(ii) | the member proves to the satisfaction of the Board that no person in default as regards supplying such information has an interest in any of the shares the subject of the transfer. |
(b) | In support of article 6.2(a), the Board may, at any time while sanctions under article 6.2(a) apply in relation to any shares, effect a transfer of the shares (or any interest in them) in favour of such nominee as specified by the Board. |
(c) | Where any person appearing to have an interest in the Default Shares has been duly served with a notice or copy thereof and the Default Shares which are the subject of such notice are held by a person holding shares or rights or interests in shares in the Company on a nominee basis who has been determined by the Company to be an approved nominee (an Approved Nominee): |
(1) | the provisions of this article 6 shall be treated as applying only to such Default Shares held by the Approved Nominee and not (insofar as such person’s apparent interest is concerned) to any other shares held by the Approved Nominee; and |
(2) | where the member upon whom a default notice is served is an Approved Nominee acting in its capacity as such, the obligations of the Approved Nominee as a member of the Company are limited to disclosing to the Company such information as is known to it relating to any person appearing to have an interest in the shares held by it. |
(d) | Where the sanctions under article 6.2(a) apply in relation to any shares, they shall cease to have effect at the end of the period of seven (7) days (or such shorter period as the Board may determine) following the earlier of: |
(1) | receipt by the Company of the information required by the notice mentioned in that article; and |
(2) | receipt by the Company of notice that the shares have been transferred by means of an excepted transfer. |
(e) | The Board may in its absolute discretion suspend or cancel any of the sanctions at any time in relation to any Default Shares. |
(f) | Upon sanctions ceasing to have effect in relation to any shares, any dividend withheld in respect of the shares must be paid to the relevant member and, if the Board has effected a transfer under article 6.2(b), the shares must be transferred back to the previous holder. |
(g) | Any new shares in the Company issued in right of Default Shares shall be subject to the same sanctions as apply to the Default Shares, and the Board may make any right to an allotment of the new shares subject to sanctions corresponding to those which will apply to those shares on issue, provided that: |
(1) | any sanctions applying to, or to a right to, new shares by virtue of this article 6.2 shall cease to have effect when the sanctions applying to the related Default Shares cease to have effect (and shall be suspended or cancelled if and to the extent that the sanctions applying to the related Default Shares are suspended or cancelled); and |
(2) | article 6.2(a) shall apply to the exclusion of this article 6.2(g) if the Company gives a separate notice under article 6.1 in relation to the new shares. |
(h) | Where, on the basis of information obtained from a member in respect of any shares held by such member, the Company gives a notice under article 6.1 to any other person, it shall at the same time send a copy of the notice to the member. The accidental omission to do so, or the non-receipt by the member of the copy, shall, however, not invalidate or otherwise affect the application of article 6.2. |
(i) | For the purposes of articles 6.1 and 6.2: |
(1) | an excepted transfer means, in relation to any shares held by a member: |
(A) | a transfer pursuant to acceptance of a takeover offer (within the meaning of article 116 of the Companies Law) in respect of shares in the Company; |
(B) | a transfer in consequence of a sale made through any stock exchange on which the shares are normally traded; or |
(C) | a transfer which is shown to the satisfaction of the Board to be made in consequence of a sale of the whole of the beneficial interest in the shares to a person who is unconnected with the member and with any other person appearing to be interested in the shares; |
(3) | a person, other than the member holding a share, will be treated as appearing to have an interest in such share if the member has informed the Company that the person has, or might have, an interest in such share, or if the Company (after taking account of any information obtained from the member or, pursuant to a notice under article 6.1, from anyone else) knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the person has, or may have, an interest in such share; |
(4) | a person shall be treated as having an interest in the Company’s shares if, for the purposes of sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Exchange Act, the person would be deemed to constitute a beneficial owner of the share (which shall include holding a CDI); and |
(5) | reference to a person having failed to give the Company the information required by a notice, includes reference to: |
(A) | the person having failed or refused to give all or any part of it; |
(B) | the person having given any information which the person knows to be false in a material particular or having recklessly given information which is false in a material particular; and |
(C) | the Company knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that any of the information provided is false or materially incorrect. |
(e) | Nothing in article 6.2 limits the powers of the Company under article 6.1 or any other powers of the Company whatsoever. |
General meetings |
Calling general meetings |
(a) | A general meeting may only be called: |
(1) | by a Board resolution; or |
(2) | as otherwise required by the Companies Law. |
(b) | The Board may, by public announcement, change the venue for, postpone or cancel a general meeting, but: |
(1) | a meeting that is called in accordance with a members’ requisition under the Companies Law; or |
(2) | any other meeting that is not called by a Board resolution, |
(c) | At an annual general meeting, only such nominations of persons for election to the Board shall be considered and such other business shall be conducted as shall have been properly brought before the meeting. To be properly brought before an annual general meeting, nominations and other business must be a proper matter for member action and must be: |
(1) | specified in the notice of general meeting given by or at the direction of the Board in accordance with article 7.2; |
(2) | brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board or a duly authorised committee thereof; or |
(3) | otherwise properly brought before the meeting by a member who: |
(A) | is a member of record of the Company (and, with respect to any beneficial owner, if different, on whose behalf such business is proposed or such nomination(s) are made, only if such beneficial owner is the beneficial owner of shares of the Company) both at the time the notice provided for in article 7.3 is delivered to the general counsel of the Company and on the record date for the determination of members entitled to vote at the general meeting, |
(B) | is entitled to vote at the meeting, and |
(C) | complies with the procedures and requirements set forth in article 7.3. |
(d) | Except as otherwise provided by the Companies Law, at an extraordinary general meeting, only such business may be conducted as is a proper matter for member action and as shall have been brought before the meeting pursuant to the notice of general meeting given by or at the direction of the Board in accordance with article 7.2. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the Board from submitting matters to the members at any extraordinary general meeting requested by members. |
(e) | Further, if the Board has determined that directors shall be elected at such extraordinary general meeting, then nominations of persons for election to the Board may be made: |
(1) | by or at the direction of the Board or by the general counsel; or |
(2) | by any member of the Company who satisfies each of the requirements set forth in subclauses (A), (B) and (C) of article 7.1(c)(3) above. |
Notice of general meetings |
(a) | Subject to the rules of any Designated Stock Exchange (including any rules relating to the settlement of transfers of securities), notice of a general meeting must be given to each person who at the time of giving the notice: |
(1) | is a member or auditor of the Company; or |
(2) | is entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event and has provided evidence of such entitlement that is satisfactory to the Board. |
(b) | The annual general meeting shall be designated as such and all other general meetings shall be designated extraordinary general meetings. |
(c) | The content of a notice of a general meeting called by the Board is to be decided by the Board, but it must state the general nature of the business to be transacted at the meeting and any other matters required by the Companies Law. |
(d) | Except with the approval of the Board or the chairperson, no person may move any amendment to a proposed resolution or to a document that relates to such a resolution. |
(e) | A person may waive notice of any general meeting by written notice to the Company. |
(f) | Failure to give a member or any other person notice of a general meeting or a proxy form does not invalidate anything done or any resolution passed at the general meeting if: |
(1) | the failure occurred by accident or inadvertent error; |
(2) | before or after the meeting, the person notifies the Company of the person’s agreement to that thing or resolution; or |
(3) | such failure is waived in accordance with article 7.2(g). |
(g) | A person’s attendance at a general meeting waives any objection that person may have to: |
(1) | a failure to give notice, or the giving of a defective notice, of the meeting unless the person at the beginning of the meeting objects to the holding of the meeting; and |
(2) | the consideration of a particular matter at the meeting which is not within the business referred to in the notice of the meeting, unless the person objects to considering the matter when it is presented. |
Nominations and Proposals by Members |
(a) | For nominations or other business to be properly brought before an annual general meeting by a member in accordance with article 7.1(c)(3), the member must have given timely notice thereof in writing and in proper form to the general counsel of the Company even if such matter is already the subject of any notice to the members or public announcement from the Board. |
(b) | To be timely in the case of an annual general meeting, a member’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Company or such other place designated by the Company for such purposes, not later than the close of business on the ninetieth (90th) day nor earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual general meeting (provided, however, that in the event that there was no annual general meeting in the prior year or the date of the annual general meeting is more than thirty (30) days before or more than ninety (90) days after such anniversary date, notice by the member must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to such annual general meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such annual general meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company). |
(c) | In the event the Company calls an extraordinary general meeting for the purpose of electing one or more directors to the Board, any member who is (i) a member of record of the Company (and, with respect to any beneficial owner, if different, on whose behalf such nomination(s) are made, only if such beneficial owner is the beneficial owner of shares of the Company) both at the time the notice provided for in article 7.3 is delivered to the general counsel of the Company and on the record date for the determination of members entitled to vote at the extraordinary general meeting and (ii) entitled to vote in such election of directors may nominate a person or persons (as the case may be) for election to such position(s) as specified in the Company’s notice of general meeting, if the member complies with the procedures and requirements set forth in this article 7.3. To be timely, such notice shall be delivered to the Company’s general counsel at the principal executive offices of the Company not earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to such extraordinary general meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such extraordinary general meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of the extraordinary general meeting and of the nominees proposed by the Board to be elected at such meeting. |
(d) | In no event shall any adjournment, deferral or postponement of a general meeting or the public announcement thereof commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a member’s notice as described in these articles. |
(e) | The number of nominees a member may nominate for election at a general meeting shall not exceed the number of directors to be elected at such general meeting, and for the avoidance of doubt, no member shall be entitled to make additional or substitute nominations following the expiration of the applicable time periods. |
(f) | A member’s notice providing for the nomination of persons for election to the Board or other business proposed to be brought before a general meeting shall set out, as to the member giving the notice the following information, in each case as of the date of such member’s notice: |
(1) | the name and address of such member, as they appear on the Company’s books, and of each of its Member Associated Persons; |
(2) | the class or series and number of shares of the Company which are, directly or indirectly, beneficially owned (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) (provided that a person shall in all events be deemed to beneficially own any shares of any class or series and number of shares of the Company as to which such person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time in the future) and owned of record by such member or any of its Member Associated Persons; |
(3) | the class or series, if any, and number of options, warrants, puts, calls, convertible securities, stock appreciation rights, or similar rights, obligations or commitments with an exercise or conversion privilege or a settlement payment or mechanism at a price related to any class or series of shares or other securities of the Company or with a value derived in whole or in part from the value of any class |
(4) | any agreement, arrangement, understanding, or relationship, including any repurchase or similar so-called “stock borrowing” agreement or arrangement, engaged in, directly or indirectly, by such member or any of its Member Associated Persons, the purpose or effect of which is to mitigate loss to, reduce the economic risk (of ownership or otherwise) of any class or series of shares or other securities of the Company by, manage the risk of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of, such member or Member Associated Person with respect to any class or series of shares or other securities of the Company, or that provides, directly or indirectly, the opportunity to profit from any decrease in the price or value of any class or series or shares or other securities of the Company; |
(5) | a complete and accurate description of any performance-related fees (other than asset-based fees) to which such member or any Member Associated Person may be entitled as a result of any increase or decrease in the value of the Company’s securities or any Derivative Securities, including any such fees to which members of any Member Associated Person’s immediate family sharing the same household may be entitled; |
(6) | a description of any other direct or indirect opportunity to profit or share in any profit (including any performance-based fees) derived from any increase or decrease in the value of shares or other securities of the Company that such member or any of its Member Associated Persons has; |
(7) | any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship pursuant to which such member or any of its Member Associated Persons has a right to vote any shares or other securities of the Company; |
(8) | any direct or indirect interest of such member or any of its Member Associated Persons in any contract with the Company, any affiliate of the Company or any principal competitor of the Company (a list of which will be provided by the Company following a written request therefor by the member to the general counsel of the Company) (including, without limitation, any employment agreement, collective bargaining agreement or consulting agreement); |
(9) | any rights to dividends on the shares of the Company owned beneficially by such member or any of its Member Associated Persons that are separated or separable from the underlying shares of the Company; |
(10) | any proportionate interest in shares of the Company or Derivative Securities held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which such member or any of its Member Associated Persons is a general partner or, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner, if any; |
(11) | a description of all agreements, arrangements, and understandings between such member or any of its Member Associated Persons and any other person(s) (including their name(s)) in connection with or related to the ownership or voting of shares of the Company or Derivative Securities; |
(12) | all other information relating to such member or any of its Member Associated Persons that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for, as applicable, such business or the election of directors in a contested election pursuant to section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; |
(13) | all other information that, as of the date of the notice, would be required to be included in a filing with respect to the Company on Schedule 13D (including the exhibits thereto) under the Exchange Act (or any successor provision thereto) by such member or the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made; |
(14) | the identification of the names and addresses of other members (including beneficial owners) known by such member to support the nomination(s) or other business proposal(s) submitted by such member and, to the extent known, the class and number of all shares of the Company owned beneficially or of record by such other members(s) or other beneficial owner(s); |
(15) | a statement as to whether either such member or any of its Member Associated Persons intends to deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Company’s voting shares required under applicable law to elect such member’s nominees and/or approve such proposal (as applicable) and/or otherwise to solicit proxies from the members in support of such nomination or proposal (as applicable) and/or solicit the holders of shares in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees pursuant to Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act; |
(16) | a representation that the member is a holder of record or a beneficial owner of shares of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy, attorney or Representative at the meeting to propose such nomination and/or other business (as applicable); and |
(17) | such additional information that the Company may reasonably request regarding such member or any of its Member Associated Persons. |
(g) | A member’s notice providing for the nomination of persons for election to the Board shall, in addition to the information required by clause (f) above, set out, as to each person whom the member proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director: |
(1) | such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected; |
(2) | a description of all direct and indirect compensation and other agreements, arrangements and understandings, and any other material relationships, between or among such member or any of its Member Associated Persons, on the one hand, and each proposed nominee or its affiliates or associates, or others acting in concert therewith, on the other hand, including all information that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 promulgated under Regulation S-K if the member making the nomination or any of its Member Associated Persons were the “registrant” for purposes of such rule and the nominee were a director or executive officer of such registrant or such Member Associated Person; |
(3) | a completed and signed questionnaire regarding the background and qualifications of such person to serve as a director, in a form to be provided by the Company after receiving a request by such member to the general counsel of the Company; |
(4) | all information with respect to such person that would be required to be set forth in a member’s notice pursuant to this article 7.3 if such person were a member or beneficial owner, on whose behalf the nomination was made, submitting a notice providing for the nomination of a person or persons for election as a director or directors of the Company in accordance with this article 7.3; |
(5) | such person’s written representation and agreement (in a form to be provided by the Company after receiving a request by such member to the general counsel of the Company): |
(A) | that such person is not and will not become party to any agreement, arrangement or understanding with, and has not given any commitment or assurance to, any person or entity as to how such person, if elected as a director of the Corporation, will act or vote on any issue or question (a “Voting Commitment”) that has not been disclosed to the Company or any Voting Commitment that could limit or interfere with such person’s ability to comply, if elected as a director of the Company, with such person’s fiduciary duties under applicable law, |
(B) | that such person is not and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement, or understanding with any person or entity other than the Company with respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement, or indemnification in connection with service or action as a director that has not been disclosed to the Company, |
(C) | that such person would, if elected as a director, comply with all of the Company’s corporate governance, ethics, conflict of interest, confidentiality and share ownership and trading policies and guidelines applicable generally to the Company’s directors (such policies and guidelines to be provided by the Company upon written request to the general counsel of the Company); |
(D) | that such person will provide facts, statements and other information in all communications with the Company and its members that are or will be true and correct and that do not and will not omit to state any fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; and |
(E) | that such person will tender his or her resignation as a director of the Company if the Board determines that such person failed to comply with the provisions of such representation and agreement in any material respect, provides such person notice of any such determination and, if such non-compliance may be cured, such person fails to cure such non-compliance within ten (10) Business Days after delivery of such notice to such person. |
(6) | all other information relating to such person or such person’s associates that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filing required to be made by such member or any Member Associated Person in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the election of directors in a contested election or otherwise required pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; and |
(7) | such additional information that the Company may reasonably request to determine the eligibility or qualifications of such person to serve as a director or an independent director of the Company, or that could be material to a reasonable member’s understanding of the qualifications and/or independence, or lack thereof, of such nominee as a director. |
(h) | A member’s notice regarding business proposed to be brought before a general meeting other than the nomination of persons for election to the Board shall, in addition to the information required by clause (f) above, set out: |
(1) | a brief description of: |
(A) | the business desired to be brought before such meeting, including the text of any resolution proposed for consideration by the members; |
(B) | the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting; and |
(C) | any material interest of such member or any of its Member Associated Persons in such business, including a description of all agreements, arrangements and understandings between such member or Member Associated Person and any other person(s) (including the name(s) of such other person(s)) in connection with or related to the proposal of such business by the member, |
(2) | if the matter such member proposes to bring before any general meeting involves an amendment to the Company’s memorandum or articles of association, the specific wording of such proposed amendment, and |
(3) | such additional information that the Company may reasonably request regarding the business that such member proposes to bring before the meeting. |
(i) | The foregoing notice requirements shall be deemed satisfied with respect to any proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 (or any successor thereof) promulgated under the Exchange Act if a member has notified the Company of its intention to present such proposal at an annual general meeting in compliance with such rule and such member’s proposal has been included in a proxy statement that has been prepared by the Company to solicit proxies for such annual general meeting. |
(j) | For purposes of this article 7.3, the term associate shall be as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. |
(k) | For purposes of this article 7.3, a Member Associated Person of any member submitting a proposal or nomination pursuant to this article 7 means: |
(1) | any beneficial owner of shares of the Company on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made by such member; |
(2) | any affiliate or associate of such member or such beneficial owner described in clause (1); |
(3) | any person or entity who is a member of a “group” (as such term is used in Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act (or any successor provision at law)) with, or any person acting in concert in respect of any matter involving the Company or its securities with, either such member or such beneficial owner described in clause (1); |
(4) | any member of the immediate family of such member or such beneficial owner described in clause (1); |
(5) | any participant (as defined in paragraphs (a)(ii)-(vi) of Instruction 3 to Item 4 of Schedule 14A) with such member, such beneficial owner described in clause (1) or any other Member Associated Person with respect to any proposed business or nominations, as applicable; and |
(6) | each person whom the member proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director. |
(l) | Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of these articles, a member shall also comply with all applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to the matters set forth in this article 7.3, including Rule 14a-19. |
(m) | Nothing in this article 7.3 shall be deemed to: |
(1) | affect any rights of members to request inclusion of proposals in the Company’s proxy statement pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act (including, without limitation, Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act); |
(2) | confer upon any member a right to have a nominee or any proposed business included in the Company’s proxy statement; or |
(3) | affect any rights of the holders of any class or series of preferred shares to elect directors pursuant to any applicable provisions of these articles. |
(n) | The Board may require any proposed nominee to submit to interviews with the Board or any committee thereof, and such proposed nominee shall make himself or herself available for any such interviews within ten (10) days following such request. |
(o) | The member providing notice pursuant to this section shall confirm or update the information contained in such member’s notice, if necessary, (x) not later than ten (10) days after the record date for the notice of the meeting so that such information is true and correct as of the record date for the notice of the meeting, and (y) not later than eight (8) Business Days before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof so that such information is true and correct as of the date that is ten (10) Business Days before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof (or if not practicable to provide such updated information not later than eight (8) Business Days before any adjournment or postponement, on the first practicable date before any such adjournment or postponement). For the avoidance of doubt, any information provided pursuant to this article 7.3(o) shall not be deemed to cure any deficiencies or inaccuracies in a notice previously delivered pursuant to this article 7.3 and shall not extend the time period for the delivery of notice pursuant to this article 7.3. If a member fails to provide such written update within such period, the information as to which such written update relates may be deemed not to have been provided in accordance with this article 7.3. |
(p) | If any information submitted pursuant to this article 7.3 by any member shall be inaccurate in any material respect (as determined by the Board or a committee thereof), such information shall be deemed not to have been provided in accordance with this article 7.3. Any member providing notice pursuant to this article 7.3 shall notify the general counsel of the Company in writing at the principal executive offices of the Company of any inaccuracy or change in any information submitted pursuant to this article 7.3 (including if any member or any Member Associated Person no longer intends to solicit proxies from the Company’s members) within two (2) Business Days after becoming aware of such inaccuracy or change, and any such |
(q) | Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this article 7.3, if the member (or a qualified representative of the member) does not appear at the general meeting of the Company to present a nomination or proposed business, such nomination shall be disregarded and such proposed business must not be transacted, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the Company. |
(r) | For purposes of this article 7.3, to be considered a qualified representative of the member, a person must be a duly authorised officer, manager or partner of such member or must be authorised by a writing executed by such member or an electronic transmission delivered by such member to act for such member as proxy at the general meeting and such person must produce such writing or electronic transmission, or a reliable reproduction of the writing or electronic transmission, at the general meeting. |
(s) | Any member and each of its Member Associated Persons soliciting proxies from other members must use a proxy card color other than white, which color shall be reserved for the exclusive use of the Board. |
(t) | The chairperson of the Board shall have the power and duty to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought before a general meeting was made or proposed in accordance with the procedures set forth in article 7.3 (including whether the member or beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made (or is part of a group which solicited) did or did not so solicit, as the case may be, proxies or votes in support of such member’s nominee or proposal in compliance with such member’s representation as required by article 7.3(f)) and, if any proposed nomination or business is not in compliance with article 7.3, to declare that such defective proposal or nomination shall be disregarded. |
(u) | Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this article 7.3, unless otherwise required by law, if (x) any member or Member Associated Person provides notice pursuant to Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act with respect to any proposed nominee and (y) such member or Member Associated Person subsequently notifies the Company that it no longer intends to solicit proxies in support of the election or re-election of such proposed nominees in accordance with Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act or fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-19(a)(2) or Rule 14a-19(a)(3) under the Exchange Act (or fails to timely provide reasonable evidence sufficient to satisfy the Company that such member or Member Associated Person has met the requirements of Rule 14a-19(a)(3) under the Exchange Act in accordance with the following sentence) and (2) no other member or Member Associated Person has provided notice pursuant to Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act with respect to such proposed nominee and has complied with the requirements of Rule 14a-19(a)(2) or Rule 14a-19(a)(3) under the Exchange Act (or has failed to timely provide reasonable evidence sufficient to satisfy the Company that such member or Member Associated Person has met the requirements of Rule 14a-19(a)(3) under the Exchange Act in accordance with the following sentence), then the nomination of each such proposed nominee shall be disregarded, notwithstanding that proxies or votes in respect of the election of such proposed nominees may have been received by the Company (which proxies and votes shall be disregarded). Upon request by the Company, if any member provides notice pursuant to Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act, such member shall deliver to the Company, no later than five (5) Business Days prior to the applicable meeting, reasonable evidence that it has met the requirements of Rule 14a-19(a)(3) under the Exchange Act. |
Record time for members |
(a) | For the purpose of determining whether a person is entitled as a member to receive notice of, attend or vote at a meeting and how many votes such person may cast, the Company may specify in the notice of the |
(b) | Changes to the entries in the register of members of the Company after the Record Time shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to receive notice of, attend or vote at such meeting. |
(c) | The Record Time applies to any adjournment or postponement of the meeting, unless the Company determines a new record time for the adjourned or postponed meeting. |
Admission to general meetings |
(a) | The chairperson of a general meeting may take any action he or she considers appropriate for the safety of persons attending the meeting and the orderly conduct of the meeting and may refuse admission to, or require to leave and remain out of, the meeting any person: |
(1) | in possession of a pictorial-recording or sound-recording device; |
(2) | in possession of a placard or banner; |
(3) | in possession of an article considered by the chairperson to be dangerous, offensive or liable to cause disruption; |
(4) | who refuses to produce or permit examination of any article, or the contents of any article, in the person’s possession; |
(5) | who refuses to comply with a request to turn off a mobile telephone, personal communication device or similar device; |
(6) | who behaves or threatens to behave or who the chairperson has reasonable grounds to believe may behave in a dangerous, offensive or disruptive way; or |
(7) | who is not entitled to receive notice of the meeting. |
(b) | A person, whether a member or not, requested by the Board or the chairperson to attend a general meeting is entitled to be present and, at the request of the chairperson, to speak at the meeting. |
(c) | If the chairperson of a general meeting considers that there is not enough room for the members who wish to attend the meeting, he or she may arrange for any person whom he or she considers cannot be seated in the main meeting room to observe or attend the general meeting in a separate room. Even if the members present in the separate room are not able to participate in the conduct of the meeting, the meeting will nevertheless be treated as validly held in the main room. |
(d) | A separate meeting place may be linked to the main place of a general meeting by an instantaneous audio-visual communication device which, by itself or in conjunction with other arrangements: |
(1) | gives the member or general body of members in the separate meeting place a reasonable opportunity to participate in proceedings in the main place; |
(2) | enables the chairperson to be aware of proceedings in the other place; and |
(3) | enables the member or members in the separate meeting place to vote on a poll, |
(e) | If, before or during the meeting, any technical difficulty occurs where one or more of the matters set out in article 7.5(d) is not satisfied, the chairperson may: |
(1) | adjourn the meeting until the difficulty is remedied; or |
(2) | continue to hold the meeting in the main place (and any other place which is linked under article 7.5(d)) and transact business, and no member may object to the meeting being held or continuing. |
(f) | Nothing in this article 7.5 or in article 7.8 is to be taken to limit the powers conferred on the chairperson by law. |
Quorum at general meetings |
(a) | No business may be transacted at a general meeting, except the election of a chairperson and the adjournment of the meeting, unless a quorum of members is present when the meeting proceeds to business. |
(b) | A quorum is persons holding or representing by proxy, attorney or Representative at least a majority of the voting power of the shares entitled to vote at such meeting. |
(c) | If a quorum is not present within thirty (30) minutes after the time appointed for the general meeting: |
(1) | where the meeting was called at the request of members, the meeting must be dissolved; or |
(2) | in any other case, the meeting stands adjourned to the day, time and place the directors present decide or, if they do not make a decision, to the same day in the next week at the same time and place and if a quorum is not present at the adjourned meeting within thirty (30) minutes after the time appointed for the meeting, the meeting must be dissolved. |
Chairperson of general meetings |
(a) | The chairperson of the Board or, in the absence of the chairperson, the deputy chairperson of the Board, the chief executive officer of the Company or any such other person as the chairperson, deputy chairperson or chief executive officer may appoint, is entitled, if present within fifteen (15) minutes after the time appointed for a general meeting and willing to act, to preside as chairperson at the meeting. |
(b) | The directors present may choose any officer or director of the Company to preside as chairperson if, at a general meeting, the chairperson, deputy chairperson or chief executive officer is not present within fifteen (15) minutes after the time appointed for the meeting and another person has not otherwise been appointed pursuant to article 7.7(a). |
(c) | If the directors do not choose a chairperson under article 7.7(b), the members present must elect as chairperson of the meeting: |
(1) | another director who is present and willing to act; or |
(2) | if no other director is present and willing to act, a member or officer of the Company who is present and willing to act. |
(d) | A chairperson of a general meeting may, for any item of business or discrete part of the meeting, vacate the chair in favour of another person nominated by him or her (Acting Chairperson). Where an instrument of proxy appoints the chairperson as proxy for part of the proceedings for which an Acting Chairperson has been nominated, the instrument of proxy is taken to be in favour of the Acting Chairperson for the relevant part of the proceedings. |
(e) | Wherever the term ‘chairperson’ is used in this article 7, it is to be read as a reference to the chairperson of the general meeting, unless the context indicates otherwise. |
Conduct at general meetings |
(a) | Subject to the provisions of the Companies Law, the chairperson is responsible for the general conduct of the meeting and for the procedures to be adopted at the meeting. |
(b) | The chairperson may, at any time the chairperson considers it necessary or desirable for the efficient and orderly conduct of the meeting: |
(1) | impose a limit on the time that a person may speak on each motion or other item of business and terminate debate or discussion on any business, question, motion or resolution being considered by the meeting and require the business, question, motion or resolution to be put to a vote of the members present; |
(2) | adopt any procedures for casting or recording votes at the meeting whether on a show of hands or on a poll, including the appointment of scrutineers; and |
(3) | decide not to put to the meeting any resolution proposed in the notice convening the meeting (other than a resolution proposed by members in accordance with the Companies Law or required by the Companies Law to be put to the meeting). |
(c) | A decision by a chairperson under articles 7.8(a) or 7.8(b) is final. |
(d) | Subject to article 7.1(b), whether or not a quorum is present, the chairperson may postpone the meeting before it has started if, at the time and place appointed for the meeting, he or she considers that: |
(1) | there is not enough room for the number of members who wish to attend the meeting; or |
(2) | a postponement is necessary in light of the behaviour of persons present or for any other reason so that the business of the meeting can be properly carried out. |
(e) | A postponement under article 7.8(d) will be to another time, which may be on the same day as the meeting, and may be to another place (and the new time and place will be taken to be the time and place for the meeting as if specified in the notice that called the meeting originally). |
(f) | Subject to article 7.1(b), the chairperson may at any time during the course of the meeting: |
(1) | adjourn the meeting or any business, motion, question or resolution being considered or remaining to be considered by the meeting either to a later time at the same meeting or to an adjourned meeting; and |
(2) | for the purpose of allowing any poll to be taken or determined, suspend the proceedings of the meeting for such period or periods as he or she decides without effecting an adjournment. No business may be transacted and no discussion may take place during any suspension of proceedings unless the chairperson otherwise allows. |
(g) | The chairperson’s rights under articles 7.8(d) and 7.8(f) are exclusive and, unless the chairperson requires otherwise, no vote may be taken or demanded by the members present concerning any postponement, adjournment or suspension of proceedings. |
(h) | Only unfinished business may be transacted at a meeting resumed after an adjournment. |
(i) | Where a meeting is postponed or adjourned under this article 7.8, notice of the postponed or adjourned meeting must be given by public announcement, but need not be given to any other person. |
(j) | Where a meeting is postponed or adjourned, the Board may, by public announcement, postpone, cancel or change the place of the postponed or adjourned meeting. |
Decisions at general meetings |
(a) | Except where a special resolution or another percentage is required, questions arising at a general meeting must be decided by a majority of votes cast by the members present at the meeting. A decision made in this way is for all purposes, a decision of the members. |
(b) | If the votes are equal on a proposed resolution, the chairperson of the meeting has a casting vote, in addition to any deliberative vote. |
(c) | Each matter submitted to a general meeting is to be decided on a poll. |
(d) | A poll at a general meeting must be taken in the way and at the time the chairperson directs. The result of the poll as declared by the chairperson is the resolution of the meeting at which the poll was demanded. |
Voting rights |
(a) | Subject to these articles and the Companies Law and to any rights or restrictions attached to any shares or class of shares, at a general meeting, every member present has one vote for each share held as at the Record Time by the member entitling the member to vote, except for partly paid shares, each of which confers only the fraction of one vote which the amount paid (not credited) on the share bears to the total amounts paid and payable (excluding amounts credited) on the share. An amount paid in advance of a call is disregarded for this purpose. |
(b) | A joint holder may vote at a meeting either personally or by proxy, attorney or Representative as if that person was the sole holder. If more than one joint holder tenders a vote in respect of the relevant shares, the vote of the holder named first in the register who tenders a vote, whether in person or by proxy, attorney or Representative, must be accepted to the exclusion of the votes of the other joint holders. |
(c) | The parent or guardian of an infant member may vote at any general meeting on such evidence being produced of the relationship or of the appointment of the guardian as the Board may require and any vote so tendered by a parent or guardian of an infant member must be accepted to the exclusion of the vote of the infant member. |
(d) | A person entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event may vote at a general meeting in respect of that share in the same way as if that person were the registered holder of the share if, at least forty-eight (48) hours before the meeting (or such shorter time as the Board determines), the Board: |
(1) | admitted that person’s right to vote at that meeting in respect of the share; or |
(2) | was satisfied of that person’s right to be registered as the holder of, or to transfer, the share. |
(e) | Where a member holds a share on which a call or other amount payable to the Company has not been duly paid: |
(1) | that member is only entitled to be present at a general meeting and vote if that member holds, as at the Record Time, other shares on which no money is then due and payable; and |
(2) | on a poll, that member is not entitled to vote in respect of that share but may vote in respect of any shares that member holds, as at the Record Time, on which no money is then due and payable. |
(f) | A member is not entitled to vote any particular shares on a resolution if, under the Companies Law or the Listing Rules: |
(1) | the member must not vote or must abstain from voting those particular shares on the resolution; or |
(2) | a vote of those particular shares on the resolution by the member must be disregarded for any purposes. |
(g) | An objection to the validity of a vote tendered at a general meeting must be: |
(1) | raised before or immediately after the result of the vote is declared; and |
(2) | referred to the chairperson, whose decision is final. |
(h) | A vote tendered, but not disallowed by the chairperson under article 7.10(g), is valid for all purposes, even if it would not otherwise have been valid. |
(i) | The chairperson may decide any difficulty or dispute which arises as to the number of votes that may be cast by or on behalf of any member and the decision of the chairperson is final. |
Representation at general meetings |
(a) | Subject to these articles, each member entitled to vote at a general meeting may vote: |
(1) | in person or, where a member is a body corporate, by its Representative; |
(2) | by proxy; or |
(3) | by attorney. |
(b) | A proxy, attorney or Representative may, but need not, be a member of the Company. |
(c) | An instrument appointing a proxy is valid if it is in accordance with the Companies Law or in any form approved by the Board. |
(d) | A vote given in accordance with an instrument appointing a proxy or attorney is valid despite the transfer of the share in respect of which the instrument was given if the transfer is not registered by the time at which the instrument appointing the proxy or attorney is required to be received under article 7.11(h). |
(e) | Unless otherwise provided in the appointment of a proxy, attorney or Representative, an appointment will be taken to confer authority: |
(1) | even though the appointment may refer to specific resolutions and may direct the proxy, attorney or Representative how to vote on those resolutions, to do any of the acts specified in article 7.11(f); and |
(2) | even though the appointment may refer to a specific meeting to be held at a specified time or venue, where the meeting is rescheduled, adjourned or postponed to another time or changed to another venue, to attend and vote at the rescheduled, adjourned or postponed meeting or at the new venue. |
(f) | The acts referred to in article 7.11(e)(1) are: |
(1) | to vote on any amendment moved to the proposed resolutions and on any motion that the proposed resolutions not be put or any similar motion; |
(2) | to vote on any motion before the general meeting, whether or not the motion is referred to in the appointment; and |
(3) | to act generally at the meeting (including to speak, demand a poll, join in demanding a poll and to move motions). |
(g) | A proxy form issued by the Company must allow for the insertion of the name of the person to be primarily appointed as proxy and may provide that, in circumstances and on conditions specified in the form that are not inconsistent with these articles, the chairperson of the relevant meeting (or another person specified in the form) is appointed as proxy. |
(h) | A proxy or attorney may not vote at a general meeting or adjourned or postponed meeting or on a poll unless the instrument appointing the proxy or attorney, and the authority under which the instrument is signed or a certified copy of the authority, are received by the Company: |
(1) | at least forty-eight (48) hours, or such lesser time as specified by the Board in the notice of meeting, (or in the case of an adjournment or postponement of a meeting, any lesser time that the Board or the chairperson of the meeting decides) before the time for holding the meeting or adjourned or postponed meeting or taking the poll, as applicable; or |
(2) | where article 7.11(i)(2) applies, such shorter period before the time for holding the meeting or adjourned or postponed meeting or taking the poll, as applicable, as the Company determines in its discretion. |
(i) | Where the Company receives an instrument appointing a proxy or attorney in accordance with this article 7.11 and within the time period specified in article 7.11(h)(1), the Company is entitled to: |
(1) | clarify with the appointing member any instruction in relation to that instrument by written or verbal communication and make any amendments to the instrument required to reflect any clarification; and |
(2) | where the Company considers that the instrument has not been duly executed, return the instrument to the appointing member and request that the member duly execute the instrument and return it to the Company within the period determined by the Company under article 7.11(h)(2) and notified to the member. |
(j) | The member is taken to have appointed the Company as its attorney for the purpose of any amendments made to an instrument appointing a proxy in accordance with article 7.11(i)(1). An instrument appointing a proxy or attorney which is received by the Company in accordance with article 7.11(i)(2) is taken to have been validly received by the Company. |
(k) | The appointment of a proxy or attorney is not revoked by the appointor attending and taking part in the general meeting, but if the appointor votes on a resolution, the proxy or attorney is not entitled to vote, and must not vote, as the appointor’s proxy or attorney on the resolution. |
(l) | Unless written notice of the matter has been received at the Company’s registered office (or at another place specified for lodging an appointment of a proxy, attorney or Representative for the meeting) within the time period specified under articles 7.11(i) or 7.11(h) (as applicable), a vote cast by a proxy, attorney or Representative is valid even if, before the vote is cast: |
(1) | a Transmission Event occurs to the member; or |
(2) | the member revokes the appointment of the proxy, attorney or Representative or revokes the authority under which a third party appointed the proxy, attorney or Representative. |
(m) | The chairperson may require a person acting as a proxy, attorney or Representative to establish to the chairperson’s satisfaction that the person is the person duly appointed to act. If the person fails to satisfy the requirement, the chairperson may: |
(1) | exclude the person from attending or voting at the meeting; or |
(2) | permit the person to exercise the powers of a proxy, attorney or Representative on the condition that, if required by the Company, such person produce evidence of the appointment within the time set by the chairperson. |
(n) | The chairperson may delegate his or her powers under article 7.11(m) to any person. |
DTC System Voting Arrangements |
(a) | Subject to the Companies Law, for the purpose of facilitating the giving of voting instructions for any general meeting by any person who holds, or holds interests in, beneficial interests in shares that are held and traded in the DTC System: |
(1) | each DTC Proxy may appoint (whether by way of instrument of proxy, power of attorney, mandate or otherwise) more than one person as its proxy in respect of the same general meeting or resolution provided that the instrument of appointment shall specify the number of shares in respect of which the proxy is appointed and only one proxy may attend the general meeting and vote in respect of any one share; |
(2) | each DTC Proxy may appoint (by power of attorney, mandate or otherwise) an agent (including, without limitation, a proxy solicitation agent or similar person) for the purposes of obtaining voting instructions and submitting them to the Company on behalf of that DTC Proxy, whether in hard copy form or electronic form; |
(3) | each instrument of appointment made by a DTC Proxy or its agent shall, unless the Company is notified to the contrary in writing at least three hours before the start of the meeting (or adjourned meeting), be deemed to confer on the relevant proxy or agent the power and authority to appoint one or more sub proxies or sub agents or otherwise sub delegate any or all of its powers to any person; |
(4) | the Board may accept any instrument of appointment made by a DTC Proxy or its agent as sufficient evidence of the authority of that DTC Proxy or agent or require evidence of the authority under which any such appointment has been made; and |
(5) | the Board may, to give effect to the intent of this article 7.12: |
(A) | make such arrangements, either generally or in any particular case, as it thinks fit (including, without limitation, making or facilitating arrangements for the submission to the Company of voting instructions on behalf of DTC Proxies, whether in hard copy form or electronic form); |
(B) | make such regulations, either generally or in any particular case, as it thinks fit, whether in addition to, or in substitution for, any other provision of these articles; and |
(C) | do such other acts and things as it considers necessary or desirable (including, without limitation, approving the form of any instrument of appointment of proxy or agent, whether in hard copy form or electronic form). |
(b) | If any question arises at or in relation to a general meeting as to whether any person has been validly appointed as a proxy or agent by a DTC Proxy or its agent to vote (or exercise any other right) in respect of any shares: |
(1) | if the question arises at a general meeting, the question will be determined by the chairperson of the meeting in his or her sole discretion; or |
(2) | if the question arises otherwise than at a general meeting, the question will be determined by the Board in its sole discretion. |
No member action by written resolution |
Directors |
Appointment and retirement of directors |
(a) | The maximum number of directors is to be determined by the Board, but may not be more than fifteen (15). The Board may not determine a maximum which is less than the number of directors in office at the time the determination takes effect. |
(b) | The Board may appoint any eligible person to be a director, either as an addition to the existing directors or to fill a casual vacancy, but so that the total number of directors does not exceed the maximum number fixed under these articles. |
(c) | The Board or a committee of the Board shall not nominate for election or re-election as director any candidate who has not agreed to tender, promptly following the meeting at which he or she is elected as director, an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon (i) the failure to receive the required number of votes for re-election at the next annual meeting of members at which he or she faces re-election, and (ii) acceptance of such resignation by the Board. |
(d) | Each director shall be elected by the vote of the majority of the votes cast with respect to the director at any meeting of the members called for the purpose of the election of directors at which a quorum is present, provided that if as of a date that is fourteen (14) days in advance of the date the Company files its definitive proxy statement (regardless of whether or not thereafter revised or supplemented) with the Securities and Exchange Commission the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, the directors shall be elected by the vote of a plurality of the shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote in the election of directors generally. For purposes of this article 8.1(d), a majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes “withheld” with respect to that director. |
(e) | If an incumbent director nominee fails to receive the required number of votes for re-election, within ninety (90) days after certification of the election results, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board will recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken and the Board will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation. |
(f) | A director appointed by the Board under article 8.1(b) holds office until the conclusion of the next annual general meeting following his or her appointment. |
(g) | Subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding class or series of preferred shares, each director shall be elected at each annual general meeting and shall hold office until the next succeeding annual general meeting and until his or her successor shall be elected and shall qualify, but subject to prior death, resignation, disqualification or removal from office. |
(h) | Where the number of persons validly proposed for election or re-election as a director is greater than the number of directors to be elected, the persons receiving the most votes (up to the number of directors to be elected) shall be elected as directors and an absolute majority of votes cast shall not be a pre-requisite to the election of such directors. |
(i) | The retirement of a director from office under these articles and the re-election of a director or the election of another person to that office (as the case may be) takes effect at the conclusion of the meeting at which the retirement and re-election or election occur. |
(j) | Subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding class or series of preferred shares, any vacancy on the Board, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors, shall only be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board then in office, even though fewer than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. |
Vacating office |
(a) | becomes prohibited or disqualified by applicable law from acting as a director of the Company; |
(b) | resigns by written notice to the Company; or |
(c) | is removed from office under article 8.3. |
Removal from office |
(a) | the director’s conviction (with a plea of nolo contendere deemed to be a conviction) of a serious felony involving moral turpitude or a violation of U.S. federal or state securities law, but excluding a conviction based entirely on vicarious liability; or |
(b) | the director’s commission of any material act of dishonesty (such as embezzlement) resulting or intended to result in material personal gain or enrichment of the director at the expense of the Company or any subsidiary and which act, if made the subject to criminal charges, would be reasonably likely to be charged as a felony, |
Remuneration |
(a) | Each director may be paid such remuneration out of the funds of the Company as the Board determines for his or her services as a director, including fees and reimbursement of expenses. |
(b) | Remuneration under article 8.4(a) may be provided in such manner that the Board decides, including by way of non-cash benefit, such as a contribution to a superannuation fund. |
(c) | Any director who performs extra services, makes any special exertions for the benefit of the Company or who otherwise performs services which, in the opinion of the Board, are outside the scope of the ordinary duties of a non- executive director, may be remunerated for the services (as determined by the Board) out of the funds of the Company. |
Director need not be a member |
(a) | Unless the Board determines otherwise from time to time in its discretion, a director is not required to hold any shares in the Company to qualify for appointment. |
(b) | A director is entitled to attend and speak at general meetings and at meetings of the holders of a class of shares, even if he or she is not a member or a holder of shares in the relevant class. |
Directors may contract with the Company and hold other offices |
(a) | The Board may make regulations requiring the disclosure of interests that a director, and any person deemed by the Board to be related to or associated with the director, may have in any matter concerning the Company or a related body corporate. Any regulations made under these articles bind all directors. |
(b) | No act, transaction, agreement, instrument, resolution or other thing is invalid or voidable only because a person fails to comply with any regulation made under article 8.6(a). |
(c) | A director is not disqualified from contracting or entering into an arrangement with the Company as vendor, purchaser or in another capacity, merely because the director holds office as a director or because of the fiduciary obligations arising from that office. |
(d) | A contract or arrangement entered into by or on behalf of the Company in which a director is in any way interested is not invalid or voidable merely because the director holds office as a director or because of the fiduciary obligations arising from that office. |
(e) | A director who is interested in any arrangement involving the Company is not liable to account to the Company for any profit realised under the arrangement merely because the director holds office as a director or because of the fiduciary obligations arising from that office. |
(f) | A director may hold any other office or position (except auditor) in the Company or any related body corporate in conjunction with his or her directorship and may be appointed to that office or position on terms (including remuneration and tenure) the Board decides. |
(g) | A director may be or become a director or other officer of, or interested in, any related body corporate or any other body corporate promoted by or associated with the Company, or in which the Company may be interested as a vendor, and need not account to the Company for any remuneration or other benefits the director receives as a director or officer of, or from having an interest in, that body corporate. |
(h) | A director who has an interest in a matter that is being considered at a meeting of the Board may, despite that interest, be present and be counted in a quorum at the meeting, unless that is prohibited by the Companies Law, but may not vote on the matter if such interest is one which to a material extent conflicts or may conflict with the interests of the Company and of which the director is aware, and in respect of any such matter the decision of the chairperson of the meeting shall be final. No act, transaction, agreement, instrument, resolution or other thing is invalid or voidable only because a director fails to comply with this prohibition. |
(i) | The Board may exercise the voting rights given by shares in any corporation held or owned by the Company in any way the Board decides. This includes voting for any resolution appointing a director as a director or other officer of that corporation or voting for the payment of remuneration to the directors or other officers of that corporation. |
(j) | A director who is interested in any contract or arrangement may, despite that interest, participate in the execution of any document by or on behalf of the Company evidencing or otherwise connected with that contract or arrangement. |
Powers and duties of directors |
(a) | The business and affairs of the Company are to be managed by or under the direction of the Board, which (in addition to the powers and authorities conferred on it by these articles) may exercise all powers and do all things that are: |
(1) | within the power of the Company; and |
(2) | are not by these articles or by law directed or required to be done by the Company in a general meeting. |
(b) | The Board may exercise all the powers of the Company: |
(1) | to borrow or raise money in any other way; |
(2) | to charge any of the Company’s property or business or any of its uncalled capital; and |
(3) | to issue debentures or give any security for a debt, liability or obligation of the Company or of any other person. |
(c) | Debentures or other securities may be issued on the terms and at prices decided by the Board, including bearing interest or not, with rights to subscribe for, or exchange into, shares or other securities in the Company or a related body corporate or with special privileges as to redemption, participating in share issues, attending and voting at general meetings and appointing directors. |
(d) | The Board may decide how cheques, promissory notes, banker’s drafts, bills of exchange or other negotiable instruments must be signed, drawn, accepted, endorsed or otherwise executed, as applicable, by or on behalf of the Company. |
(e) | The Board may: |
(1) | appoint or employ any person as an officer, agent or attorney of the Company for the purposes, with the powers, discretions and duties (including those vested in or exercisable by the Board), for any period and on any other conditions they decide; |
(2) | authorise an officer, agent or attorney to delegate any of the powers, discretions and duties vested in the officer, agent or attorney; and |
(3) | remove or dismiss any officer, agent or attorney of the Company at any time, with or without cause. |
(f) | A power of attorney may contain any provisions for the protection and convenience of the attorney or persons dealing with the attorney that the Board decides. |
(g) | Nothing in this article 8.7 limits the general nature of article 8.7(a). |
Delegation by the Board |
(a) | The Board may delegate any of its powers to one director, a committee of the Board, or any person or persons. |
(b) | A director, committee of the Board, or person to whom any powers have been so delegated must exercise the powers delegated in accordance with any directions of the Board. |
(c) | The acceptance of a delegation of powers by a director may, if the Board so resolves, be treated as an extra service or special exertion performed by the delegate for the purposes of article 8.4(e). |
(d) | The provisions of these articles applying to meetings and resolutions of the Board apply, so far as they can and with any necessary changes, to meetings and resolutions of a committee of the Board, except to the extent they are contrary to any direction given under article 8.8(b). |
Proceedings of directors |
(a) | The directors may meet together to attend to business and adjourn and otherwise regulate their meetings as they decide. |
(b) | The contemporaneous linking together by telephone or other electronic means of a sufficient number of directors to constitute a quorum, constitutes a meeting of the Board. All the provisions in these articles relating to meetings of the Board apply, as far as they can and with any necessary changes, to meetings of the Board by telephone or other electronic means. |
(c) | A meeting by telephone or other electronic means is to be taken to be held at the place where the chairperson of the meeting is or at such other place the chairperson of the meeting decides, as long as at least one of the directors involved was at that place for the duration of the meeting. |
(d) | A director taking part in a meeting by telephone or other electronic means is to be taken to be present in person at the meeting and all directors participating in the meeting will (unless there is a specific statement otherwise) be taken to have consented to the holding of the meeting by the relevant electronic means. |
(e) | If, before or during the meeting, any technical difficulty occurs where one or more directors cease to participate, the chairperson may adjourn the meeting until the difficulty is remedied or may, where a quorum of directors remains present, continue with the meeting. |
Calling meetings of the Board |
(a) | The chairperson of the Board, the chief executive officer of the Company or a majority of the Board may call a meeting of the Board. |
(b) | A secretary must, if requested by the chairperson of the Board, the chief executive officer of the Company or a majority of the Board, call a meeting of the Board. |
Notice of meetings of the Board |
(a) | Notice of a meeting of the Board must be given to each person who is, at the time the notice is given, a director, except a director on leave of absence approved by the Board. |
(b) | A notice of a meeting of the Board: |
(1) | must specify the time and place of the meeting; |
(2) | need not state the nature of the business to be transacted at the meeting; |
(3) | may, if necessary, be given immediately before the meeting; and |
(4) | may be given in person or by post or by telephone, fax or other electronic means, or in any other way consented to by the directors from time to time. |
(c) | A director may waive notice of a meeting of the Board by giving notice to that effect in person or by post or by telephone, fax or other electronic means. |
(d) | Failure to give a director notice of a meeting of the Board does not invalidate anything done or any resolution passed at the meeting if: |
(1) | the failure occurred by accident or inadvertent error; or |
(2) | the director attended the meeting or waived notice of the meeting (whether before or after the meeting). |
(e) | A person who attends a meeting of the Board waives any objection that person may have to a failure to give notice of the meeting. |
Quorum at meetings of the Board |
(a) | No business may be transacted at a meeting of the Board unless a quorum of directors is present at the time the business is dealt with. |
(b) | Unless the Board decides differently, a majority of the total number of directors in office constitutes a quorum. |
(c) | If there is a vacancy in the office of a director, the remaining directors may act. But, if their number is not sufficient to constitute a quorum, they may act only in an emergency or to increase the number of directors to a number sufficient to constitute a quorum or to call a general meeting of the Company. |
Chairperson and deputy chairperson of the Board |
(a) | The Board must elect a director to the office of chairperson of the Board and may elect one or more directors to the office of deputy chairperson of the Board. The Board may decide the period for which those offices will be held. |
(b) | Meetings of the Board shall be presided over by the chairperson of the Board or, in his or her absence, by the director who is designated by the chairperson of the Board prior to the applicable meeting, if any, or, in his or her absence, by the deputy chairperson of the Board, if any, or, in his or her absence, by a chairperson chosen at the meeting. The general counsel of the Company shall act as secretary of the meeting, but in his or her absence, the chair of the meeting may appoint any person to act as secretary of the meeting. |
Decisions of the Board |
(a) | The Board, at a meeting at which a quorum is present, may exercise any authorities, powers and discretions vested in or exercisable by the Board under these articles. |
(b) | Questions arising at a meeting of the Board must be decided by a majority of votes cast by the directors present and entitled to vote on the matter. |
Written resolutions |
(a) | A resolution in writing signed by all directors or a resolution in writing of which notice has been given to all directors and which is signed by all directors entitled to vote on the resolution is a valid resolution of the Board. The resolution is taken to have been passed by a meeting of the Board when the last director signs or consents to the resolution unless provided otherwise in such written resolution. |
(b) | A director may consent to a resolution by: |
(1) | signing the document containing the resolution (or a copy of that document); or |
(2) | giving to the Company a written notice (including by fax to its registered office or other electronic means) addressed to the general counsel or to the chairperson of the Board signifying assent to the resolution and either setting out its terms or otherwise clearly identifying them. |
Validity of acts |
(a) | a defect in the appointment of a person as a director or a member of a committee; or |
(b) | a person so appointed being disqualified or not being entitled to vote, |
Business combinations with interested members |
Business combinations with interested members |
(a) | Notwithstanding any other provisions of these articles, the Company must not engage in any business combination with any interested member for a period of three (3) years following the time that such member became an interested member, unless: |
(1) | prior to such time the Board approved either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the member becoming an interested member; |
(2) | upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the member becoming an interested member, the interested member owned at least 85% of the voting shares of the Company outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the voting shares outstanding (but not the outstanding voting shares owned by the interested member) those shares owned: |
(A) | by persons who are directors and also officers; and |
(B) | employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender, exchange or takeover offer; or |
(3) | at or subsequent to such time the business combination is approved by the Board and authorised at a general meeting, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting shares which is not owned by the interested member. |
(b) | The restrictions contained in article 9.1(a) shall not apply if: |
(1) | the Company does not have a class of voting shares that is either: |
(A) | listed on a stock exchange; or |
(B) | held of record by more than 2,000 members, unless any of the foregoing results from action taken, directly or indirectly, by an interested member or from a transaction in which a person becomes an interested member; |
(2) | a member becomes an interested member inadvertently and: |
(A) | as soon as practicable divests itself of ownership of sufficient shares so that the member ceases to be an interested member; and |
(B) | would not, at any time within the three (3)-year period immediately prior to a business combination between the Company and such member, have been an interested member but for the inadvertent acquisition of ownership; or |
(3) | the business combination is proposed prior to the consummation or abandonment of and subsequent to the earlier of the public announcement or the notice required hereunder of a proposed transaction which: |
(A) | constitutes one of the transactions described in article 9.1(c); |
(B) | is with or by a person who either was not an interested member during the previous three (3) years or who became an interested member with the approval of the Board or during the period described in article 9.1(b)(1); and |
(C) | is approved or not opposed by a majority of the members of the Board then in office (but not less than one (1)) who were directors prior to any person becoming an interested member during the previous three (3) years or were recommended for election or elected to succeed such directors by a majority of such directors. |
(4) | the business combination is with an interested member who became an interested member at a time when the restrictions contained in this article 9.1 did not apply by reason of article 9.1(b)(1). |
(c) | The proposed transactions referred to in article 9.1(b)(3)(A) are limited to: |
(1) | a merger or consolidation of the Company (except for a merger in respect of which no vote of the members of the Company is required); |
(2) | a sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition (in one transaction or a series of transactions), whether as part of a dissolution or otherwise, of assets of the Company or of any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company (other than to any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary or to the Company) having an aggregate market value equal to 50% or more of either that aggregate market value of all of the assets of the Company determined on a consolidated basis or the aggregate market value of all the outstanding shares of the Company; or |
(3) | a proposed tender, exchange or takeover offer for 50% or more of the outstanding voting shares of the Company. |
(d) | The Company shall give not less than twenty (20) days’ notice to all interested members prior to the consummation of any of the transactions described in article 9.1(c)(1) or 9.1(c)(2). |
(e) | As used in this article 9.1, the term: |
(1) | Associate, when used to indicate a relationship with any person, means: |
(A) | any corporation, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity of which such person is a director, officer or partner or is, directly or indirectly, the owner of 20% or more of any class of voting shares; |
(B) | any trust or other estate in which such person has at least a 20% beneficial interest or as to which such person serves as trustee or in a similar fiduciary capacity; and |
(C) | any relative or spouse of such person, or any relative of such spouse, who has the same residence as such person; |
(2) | Business combination, when used in reference to the Company and any interested member of the Company, means: |
(A) | any merger or consolidation of the Company (including by way of compromise, arrangement, reconstruction, amalgamation or takeover) or any direct or indirect majority- owned subsidiary of the Company with (A) the interested member, or (B) with any other corporation, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity if the merger or consolidation is caused by the interested member and as a result of such merger or consolidation article 9.1(a) is not applicable to the surviving entity; |
(B) | any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition (in one transaction or a series of transactions), except proportionately as a member of the Company, to or with the interested member, whether as part of a dissolution or otherwise, of assets of the Company or of any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company which assets have an aggregate market value equal to 10% or more of either the aggregate market value of all the assets of the Company determined on a consolidated basis or the aggregate market value of all the outstanding shares of the Company; |
(C) | any transaction which results in the issuance or transfer by the Company or by any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company of any shares of the Company or of such subsidiary to the interested member, except: |
(i) | pursuant to the exercise, exchange or conversion of securities exercisable for, exchangeable for or convertible into shares of the Company or any such subsidiary which securities were outstanding prior to the time that the interested member became such; |
(ii) | pursuant to a merger of the Company with or into a single direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company; |
(iii) | pursuant to a dividend or distribution paid or made, or the exercise, exchange or conversion of securities exercisable for, exchangeable for or convertible into shares of the Company or any such subsidiary which security is distributed, pro rata to all holders of a class or series of shares of the Company subsequent to the time the interested member became such; |
(iv) | pursuant to an exchange offer by the Company to purchase shares made on the same terms to all holders of said shares; or |
(v) | any issuance or transfer of shares by the Company; |
(D) | any transaction involving the Company or any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company which has the effect, directly or indirectly, of increasing the proportionate share of the shares of any class or series, or securities convertible into the shares of any class or series, of the Company or of any such subsidiary which is owned by the interested member, except as a result of immaterial changes due to fractional share adjustments or as a result of any purchase or redemption of any shares not caused, directly or indirectly, by the interested member; or |
(E) | any receipt by the interested member of the benefit, directly or indirectly (except proportionately as a member of the Company), of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits (other than those expressly permitted in clauses (A)-(D) of this article 9.1(e)(2)) provided by or through the Company or any direct or indirect majority- owned subsidiary; |
(3) | Interested member means any person (other than the Company and any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company) that: |
(A) | is the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting shares of the Company; or |
(B) | is an affiliate or associate of the Company and was the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting shares of the Company at any time within the three (3)-year period immediately prior to the date on which it is sought to be determined whether such person is an interested member, and the affiliates and associates of such person; |
(4) | Owner, including the terms own and owned, when used with respect to any shares, means a person that individually or with or through any of its affiliates or associates: |
(A) | beneficially owns such shares, directly or indirectly; or |
(B) | has (i) the right to acquire such shares (whether such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time) pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, or upon the exercise of conversion rights, exchange rights, warrants or options, or otherwise; provided, however, that a person shall not be deemed the owner of shares tendered pursuant to a tender, exchange or takeover offer made by such person or any of such person’s affiliates or associates until such tendered shares are accepted for purchase or exchange; or (ii) the right to vote such shares pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding; provided, however, that a person shall not be deemed the owner of any shares because of such person’s right to vote such shares if the agreement, arrangement or understanding to vote such shares arises solely from a revocable proxy or consent given in response to a proxy or consent solicitation made to ten (10) or more persons; or |
(C) | has any agreement, arrangement or understanding for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting (except voting pursuant to a revocable proxy or consent as described in clause (B) of this article 9.1(e)(4)), or disposing of such shares with any other person that beneficially owns, or whose affiliates or associates beneficially own, directly or indirectly, such shares. |
Officers |
Executive directors |
(a) | The Board may appoint one or more of the directors to be an officer. For the avoidance of doubt, an officer need not be a director. |
(b) | A director who is an officer may be referred to by any title the Board decides on. |
Provisions applicable to all officers |
(a) | The officers of the Company shall be a chief executive officer, one or more vice presidents, a secretary, a treasurer, and a controller, all of whom shall be elected by the Board. The Board or the chief executive officer of the Company may appoint such other officers, including one or more assistant secretaries, assistant treasurers and assistant controllers as either of them shall deem necessary, who shall have such authority and perform such duties as may be prescribed in such appointment. |
(b) | The appointment of an officer may be for the period, at the remuneration and on the conditions the Board decides. |
(c) | The Board may: |
(1) | delegate to or give an officer any powers, discretions and duties it decides; |
(2) | withdraw, suspend or vary any of the powers, discretions and duties given to an officer; and |
(3) | authorise the officer to delegate any of the powers, discretions and duties given to the officer. |
(d) | Unless the Board decides otherwise, the office of a director who is employed by the Company or by a subsidiary of the Company automatically becomes vacant if the director ceases to be so employed. |
(e) | An act done by a person acting as an officer is not invalidated by: |
(1) | a defect in the person’s appointment as an officer; |
(2) | the person being disqualified to be an officer; or |
(3) | the person having vacated office, |
Indemnity and insurance |
Persons to whom articles 11.2 and 11.4 apply |
(a) | to each person who is or has been a director or officer (within the meaning of article 10.2(a)) of the Company; and |
(b) | to such other officers or former officers of the Company or of its related bodies corporate as the Board in each case determines; |
Indemnity |
Extent of indemnity |
(a) | is enforceable without the Officer having to first incur any expense or make any payment; |
(b) | is a continuing obligation and is enforceable by the Officer even though the Officer may have ceased to be a director or officer of the Company or its related bodies corporate; and |
(c) | applies to Liabilities incurred both before and after the adoption of these articles. |
Insurance |
(a) | purchase and maintain insurance; and/or |
(b) | pay or agree to pay a premium for insurance, |
Savings |
(a) | affects any other right or remedy that a person to whom those articles apply may have in respect of any Liability referred to in those articles; |
(b) | limits the capacity of the Company to indemnify or provide or pay for insurance for any person to whom those articles do not apply; or |
(c) | limits or diminishes the terms of any indemnity conferred or agreement to indemnify entered into prior to the adoption of these articles. |
Deed |
Winding up |
Distributing surplus |
(a) | if the Company is wound up and the property of the Company available for distribution among the members is more than sufficient to pay: |
(1) | all the debts and liabilities of the Company; and |
(2) | the costs, charges and expenses of the winding up, |
(b) | for the purpose of calculating the excess referred to in article 12.1(a), any amount unpaid on a share is to be treated as property of the Company; |
(c) | the amount of the excess that would otherwise be distributed to the holder of a partly paid share under article 12.1(a) must be reduced by the amount unpaid on that share at the date of the distribution; and |
(d) | if the effect of the reduction under article 12.1(c) would be to reduce the distribution to the holder of a partly paid share to a negative amount, the holder must contribute that amount to the Company. |
Dividing property |
(a) | If the Company is wound up, the liquidator or the directors, as the case may be, may, subject to these articles and any other sanction required by the Companies Law, do either or both of the following: |
(1) | divide in specie among the members the whole or any part of the assets of the Company and, for that purpose, value any assets and determine how the division shall be carried out as between the members or different classes of members; |
(2) | vest the whole or any part of the assets in trustees for the benefit of members and those liable to contribute to the winding up. |
(b) | No member shall be compelled to accept any assets if an obligation attaches to them. |
(c) | If any of the property to be divided under article 12.2(a) includes securities with a liability to calls, any person entitled under the division to any of the securities may, within ten (10) days after the passing of the special resolution referred to in article 12.2(a), by written notice direct the liquidator to sell the person’s proportion of the securities and account for the net proceeds. The liquidator must, if practicable, act accordingly. |
(d) | Nothing in this article 12.2 takes away from or affects any right to exercise any statutory or other power which would have existed if this article were omitted. |
(e) | Article 4.3 applies, so far as it can and with any necessary changes, to a division by a liquidator under article 12.2(a) as if references in article 4.3 to: |
(1) | the Board were references to the liquidator; and |
(2) | a distribution or capitalisation were references to the division under article 12.2(a). |
Inspection of and access to records |
(a) | A person who is not a director does not have the right to inspect any of the Board papers, books, records or documents of the Company, except as provided by law, or these articles, or as authorised by the Board. |
(b) | The Company may enter into contracts with its directors or former directors agreeing to provide continuing access for a specified period after the director ceases to be a director to Board papers, books, records and documents of the Company which relate to the period during which the director or former director was a director on such terms and conditions as the Board thinks fit and which are not inconsistent with this article 13. |
(c) | The Company may procure that its subsidiaries provide similar access to Board papers, books, records or documents as that set out in articles 13(a) and 13(b). |
(d) | This article 13 does not limit any right the directors or former directors otherwise have. |
Seals |
Manner of execution |
Common seal |
Safe custody of Seal |
Using the Seal |
Seal register |
(a) | The Company may keep a Seal register and, on affixing the Seal to any document (other than a certificate for securities of the Company) may enter in the register particulars of the document, including a short description of the document. |
(b) | The register, or any details from it that the Board requires, may be produced at meetings of the Board for noting the use of the Seal since the previous meeting of the Board. |
(c) | Failure to comply with articles 14.5(a) or 14.5(b) does not invalidate any document to which the Seal is properly affixed. |
Duplicate seals and certificate seals |
(a) | The Company may have one or more duplicate seals for use in place of its common seal outside the state or territory where its common seal is kept. Each duplicate seal must be a facsimile of the common seal of the Company with the addition on its face of the words ‘duplicate seal’ and the name of the place where it is to be used. |
(b) | A document sealed with a duplicate seal, or a certificate seal as provided in article 14.7, is to be taken to have been sealed with the common seal of the Company. |
Sealing and signing certificates |
Notices |
Notices by the Company to members |
(a) | Without limiting any other way in which notice may be given to a member under these articles, the Companies Law, applicable securities laws and/or the Listing Rules, the Company may give a notice to a member by: |
(1) | delivering it personally to the member; |
(2) | sending it by prepaid post to the member’s address in the register of members or any other address the member supplies to the Company for giving notices; |
(3) | sending it by fax or other electronic means to the fax number or electronic address the member has supplied to the Company for giving notices; or |
(4) | publishing the notice on a website and providing notification to that effect to the member by any of the other means permitted under this article 15.1. |
(b) | The Company may give a notice to the joint holders of a share by giving the notice in the way authorised by article 15.1(a) to the joint holder named first in the register of members for the share. |
(c) | The Company may give a notice to a person entitled to a share as a result of a Transmission Event by delivering it or sending it in the manner authorised by article 15.1(a) addressed to the name or title of the person, to: |
(1) | the address, fax number or electronic address that person has supplied to the Company for giving notices to that person; or |
(2) | if that person has not supplied an address, fax number or electronic address, to the address, fax number or electronic address to which the notice might have been sent if that Transmission Event had not occurred. |
(d) | A notice given to a member under articles 15.1(a) or 15.1(b) is, even if a Transmission Event has occurred and whether or not the Company has notice of that occurrence: |
(1) | duly given for any shares registered in that person’s name, whether solely or jointly with another person; and |
(2) | sufficiently served on any person entitled to the shares because of the Transmission Event. |
(e) | A notice given to a person who is entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event is sufficiently served on the member in whose name the share is registered. |
(f) | A person who, because of a transfer of shares, becomes entitled to any shares registered in the name of a member, is taken to have received every notice which, before that person’s name and address is entered in the register of members for those shares, is given to the member complying with this article 15.1. |
(g) | A signature to any notice given by the Company to a member under this article 15.1 may be printed or affixed by some mechanical, electronic or other means. |
(h) | Where a member does not have a registered address or where the Company believes that member is not known at the member’s registered address, all notices are taken to be: |
(1) | given to the member if the notice is exhibited in the Company’s registered office for a period of forty-eight (48) hours; and |
(2) | served at the commencement of that period, |
Notices by the Company to directors |
(a) | delivering it personally to him or her; |
(b) | sending it by prepaid post to his or her usual residential or business address, or any other address he or she has supplied to the Company for giving notices; or |
(c) | sending it by fax or other electronic means to the fax number or electronic address he or she has supplied to the Company for giving notices. |
Notices by directors to the Company |
(a) | delivering it to the Company’s registered office; |
(b) | sending it by prepaid post to the Company’s registered office; or |
(c) | sending it by fax or other electronic means to the principal fax number or electronic address at the Company’s registered office. |
Time of service |
(a) | A notice from the Company properly addressed and posted is taken to be served at 10.00am (local time in the place of dispatch) on the day after the date it is posted. |
(b) | A certificate signed by a secretary or officer of the Company to the effect that a notice was duly posted under these articles is conclusive evidence of that fact. |
(c) | Where the Company sends a notice by fax, the notice is taken as served at the time the fax is sent if the correct fax number appears on the facsimile transmission report produced by the sender’s fax machine. |
(d) | Where the Company sends a notice by electronic transmission, the notice is taken as served at the time the electronic transmission is sent. |
(e) | Where the Company gives a notice to a member by any other means permitted by the Companies Law relating to the giving of notices and electronic means of access to them, the notice is taken as given at 10.00am (local time in the place of the Company’s principal office) on the day after the date on which the member is notified that the notice is available. |
(f) | Where a given number of days’ notice or notice extending over any other period must be given, the day of service is not to be counted in the number of days or other period. |
Other communications and documents |
Written notices |
General |
Submission to jurisdiction |
(a) | Each member submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Royal Court of Jersey and the courts which may hear appeals from that court. |
(b) | Unless the Companies Law or any other Jersey law provides otherwise or unless the Board determines otherwise, the Royal Court of Jersey is the sole and exclusive forum for: |
(1) | any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, |
(2) | any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer of the Company to the Company or its members, creditors or other constituents, |
(3) | any action asserting a claim against the Company or any director or officer of the Company arising pursuant to any provision of the Companies Law or these articles (as either may be amended from time to time), or |
(4) | any action asserting a claim against the Company or any director or officer of the Company governed by the internal affairs doctrine. |
Prohibition and enforceability |
(a) | Any provision of, or the application of any provision of, these articles which is prohibited in any place is, in that place, ineffective only to the extent of that prohibition. |
(b) | Any provision of, or the application of any provision of, these articles which is void, illegal or unenforceable in any place does not affect the validity, legality or enforceability of that provision in any other place or of the remaining provisions in that or any other place. |
Corporate governance policies |
(a) | The directors may, from time to time, and except as required by applicable law or the Listing Rules, adopt, institute, amend, modify or revoke the corporate governance policies or initiatives, which shall be intended to set forth the policies of the Company and the directors on various corporate governance related matters, as the directors shall determine from time to time. |
1 | This proviso will only be included in the Joinder Agreement for U.S. Merger Sub. |
2 | To be included in the Joinder for U.S. Merger Co. |
3 | To be included in the Joinder for U.S. Merger Co. |
| | [Joined Party] | ||||
| | | | |||
| | By: | | | ||
| | Name: | | | ||
| | Title: | | |
| | LIVENT CORPORATION | ||||
| | | | |||
| | By: | | | /s/ Paul Graves | |
| | Name: | | | Paul Graves | |
| | Title: | | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | ALLKEM LIMITED | ||||
| | | | |||
| | By: | | | /s/ Martín Pérez de Solay | |
| | Name: | | | Martín Pérez de Solay | |
| | Title: | | | Managing Director and CEO |
(1) | Allkem Limited (ACN 112 589 910) whose registered office is at Level 35, 71 Eagle Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 (Allkem); |
(2) | Eligible Shareholders; and |
(3) | Ineligible Overseas Shareholders. |
(A) | Allkem is a public company limited by shares incorporated in Australia. It has its registered office at registered office is at Level 35, 71 Eagle Street, Brisbane QLD 4000. Allkem is admitted to the official list of ASX and Allkem Shares are quoted on the securities exchange operated by ASX and the TSX. |
(C) | Livent Corporation (Livent) is a public corporation incorporated in Delaware, in the United States of America. It has its principal executive office at [•]. Livent stock is listed on NYSE. |
(D) | New TopCo (New TopCo) is a public limited company incorporated under the laws of the Bailiwick of Jersey. It has its registered address at [•]. |
(E) | Allkem, Livent and New TopCo entered into the Transaction Agreement on or about 10 May 2023 to facilitate (among other things) the implementation of this Scheme as part of the Transaction. |
(F) | By no later than the day that is one Business Day prior to the First Court Date, New TopCo will have executed the Deed Poll under which New TopCo will covenant in favour of the Eligible Shareholders and Ineligible Overseas Shareholders to perform the obligations attributable to it under this Scheme, including to provide the Scheme Consideration to Eligible Shareholders in accordance with the terms of this Scheme. |
(G) | If this Scheme becomes Effective: |
(a) | after the Scheme Record Date and prior to Scheme Implementation, all of the Ineligible Shares will be transferred to the Sale Nominee; and |
(b) | on the Implementation Date: |
(i) | New TopCo will provide the Scheme Consideration to Eligible Shareholders (including the Sale Nominee) in accordance with the terms of this Scheme and the Deed Poll; |
(ii) | all of the Scheme Shares, and all of the rights and entitlements attaching to them as at the Implementation Date, will be transferred to New TopCo; and |
(iii) | Allkem will enter New TopCo’s name in the Allkem Share Register as the holder of all of the Scheme Shares; and |
(c) | following the Implementation Date, the Consideration CDIs issued to the Sale Nominee on Scheme Implementation in respect of the Ineligible Shares transferred to it under paragraph (a) will be sold by the Sale Nominee, with the net proceeds of such Consideration CDIs being paid to the Ineligible Overseas Shareholders on a pro-rata basis. |
1 | INTERPRETATION |
1.1 | Definitions |
(a) | when used in relation to the Implementation Date and the Scheme Record Date, has the meaning given in the ASX Listing Rules; and |
(b) | in all other cases, means any day other than: |
(i) | a Saturday or a Sunday; or |
(ii) | a day on which banking and savings and loan institutions are authorised or required by law to be closed in Perth, Western Australia, Australia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, the Bailiwick of Jersey or Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America. |
1 | Entity name for Canadian transfer agent to be confirmed |
(a) | a Scheme Shareholder who is not an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder; and |
(b) | the Sale Nominee. |
(a) | a Security Interest; or |
(b) | an easement, restrictive covenant, caveat or similar restriction over property. |
(a) | each Allkem Share held by a Scheme Shareholder (other than an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder) as at the Scheme Record Date; and |
(b) | each Allkem Share held by an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder and transferred to the Sale Nominee after the Scheme Record Date and prior to Scheme Implementation pursuant to clause 4.4 of this Scheme. |
(a) | a security interest that is subject to the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth); |
(b) | any other mortgage, charge, pledge or lien; or |
(c) | any other interest or arrangement of any kind that in substance secures the payment of money or the performance of an obligation, or that gives a creditor priority over unsecured creditors in relation to any property. |
1.2 | Rules for interpreting this Scheme |
(a) | A reference to: |
(i) | a legislative provision or legislation (including subordinate legislation) is to that provision or legislation as amended, re-enacted or replaced, and includes any subordinate legislation issued under it; |
(ii) | a clause is to a clause of this Scheme; |
(iii) | a document (including this Scheme) or agreement, or a provision of a document (including this Scheme) or agreement, is to that document, agreement or provision as amended, supplemented, replaced or novated; |
(iv) | a group of persons is a reference to any 2 or more of them jointly and to each of them individually; |
(v) | a party to this Scheme, or to any other document or agreement, includes a permitted substitute or a permitted assign of that party; |
(vi) | a person includes any type of entity or body of persons, whether or not it is incorporated or has a separate legal identity, and any executor, administrator or successor in law of the person; and |
(vii) | any thing (including a right, amount, obligation or concept) includes each part of it. |
(b) | A singular word includes the plural, and vice versa. |
(c) | A word that suggests one gender includes the other genders. |
(d) | If a word or phrase is defined, any other grammatical form of that word or phrase has a corresponding meaning. |
(e) | If an example is given of anything (including a right, obligation or concept), such as by saying it includes something else, the example does not limit the scope of that thing. |
(f) | The word officer has the same meaning as given by the Corporations Act. |
(g) | A reference to A$, $ or dollar is to Australian currency. |
(h) | A reference to time in this Scheme is a reference to Australian Western Standard Time, unless otherwise expressly specified. |
(i) | Nothing in this Scheme is to be construed adversely to a party just because that party prepared this Scheme or prepared or proposed the relevant part of this Scheme. |
1.3 | Non–Business Days |
2 | CONDITIONS PRECEDENT |
2.1 | Conditions precedent to the Scheme |
(a) | As at 8.00 am on the Second Court Date, the conditions in Exhibit A of the Transaction Agreement (other than the conditions in paragraph 1(b) and 1(c) of Exhibit A of the Transaction Agreement) has been satisfied or waived in accordance with the terms of the Transaction Agreement. |
(b) | Prior to 8.00 am on the Second Court Date, neither the Transaction Agreement nor the Deed Poll has been terminated in accordance with their terms. |
(c) | The order of the Court made under section 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act (and, if applicable, section 411(6) of the Corporations Act, subject to such alterations or conditions being agreed in accordance with clause 3.3) approving this Scheme comes into effect pursuant to section 411(10) of the Corporations Act on or before either or both of the Transaction Agreement and the Deed Poll are terminated in accordance with their respective terms. |
2.2 | Certificates |
(a) | Before 8.30 am on the Second Court Date: |
(i) | Allkem must provide to the Court: |
(A) | a certificate, in the form of a deed, confirming whether or not, in respect of matters within Allkem’s knowledge, the conditions precedent in clause 2.1(a) and 2.1(b) have been satisfied |
(B) | a certificate from Livent, in the form of a deed, confirming whether or not, in respect of matters within Livent’s knowledge, the conditions precedent in clause 2.1(a) and 2.1(b) have been satisfied; and |
(ii) | New TopCo must provide to the Court a certificate, in the form of a deed, confirming whether or not, in respect of matters within New TopCo’s knowledge, the conditions precedent in clause 2.1(a) and 2.1(b) have been satisfied. |
(b) | The certificates referred to in clause 2.2(a) constitute conclusive evidence that the conditions precedent in clauses 2.1(a) and 2.1(b) have been satisfied. |
2.3 | Scheme Effective Date |
2.4 | When Scheme will lapse |
3 | THE SCHEME |
3.1 | Lodgement of copy of Court Order with ASIC |
(a) | as soon as possible after the date on which the Court makes the Court Orders and in accordance with the time limit set out in item 10 of Appendix 7A of the ASX Listing Rules; or |
(b) | on such other Business Day and by such other time as agreed to in writing by Livent and Allkem. |
3.2 | Transfer of Scheme Shares |
(a) | subject to New TopCo taking the steps to provide the Scheme Consideration which it is required to take on the Scheme Implementation Date under clause 4, all of the Scheme Shares, together with all rights and entitlements attaching to the Scheme Shares as at the Scheme Implementation Date, will be transferred to New TopCo without the need for any further act by any Scheme Shareholder or the Sale Nominee (other than acts performed by Allkem or its directors and officers as attorney and agent for the Scheme Shareholders and the Sale Nominee under this Scheme) by: |
(i) | Allkem delivering to New TopCo a duly completed registrable Scheme Transfer to transfer the Scheme Shares to New TopCo, which Scheme Transfer has been duly executed by Allkem (or any of its directors and officers) as the attorney and agent of each Eligible Shareholder as a transferor under clauses 6.2 and 6.4; and |
(ii) | New TopCo duly completing and executing the Scheme Transfer as transferee and delivering the Scheme Transfer to Allkem for registration; and |
(b) | immediately following receipt of the Scheme Transfer in accordance with clause 3.2(a)(ii), Allkem must: |
(i) | attend to registration of the Scheme Transfer; and |
(ii) | enter or procure the entry of the name and address of New TopCo in the Allkem Share Register as the holder of all of the Scheme Shares. |
3.3 | Alteration or condition to Scheme |
(a) | Allkem may, by its counsel, consent on behalf of all persons concerned, including each Scheme Shareholder (and, to avoid doubt, the Sale Nominee), to those alterations or conditions; and |
(b) | each Scheme Shareholder (and, to avoid doubt, the Sale Nominee) agrees to any such alterations or conditions that counsel for Allkem has consented to. |
4 | SCHEME CONSIDERATION |
4.1 | Elections by Eligible Shareholders |
(a) | Each Eligible Shareholder (other than the Sale Nominee and the Eligible Canadian Branch Shareholders) may become a Share Electing Shareholder by providing Allkem with a duly completed Share Election before 7.00 pm (Sydney time) on the day that is three Business Days prior to the Scheme Record Date. |
(b) | Each Eligible Canadian Branch Shareholder may become a CDI Electing Shareholder by providing Allkem with a duly completed CDI Election before 7.00 pm (Sydney time) on the day that is three Business Days prior to the Scheme Record Date. |
(c) | To avoid doubt, a Share Election or CDI Election submitted by an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder will be of no force or effect. |
4.2 | Entitlement to Scheme Consideration |
(a) | On the Scheme Implementation Date, in consideration for the transfer to New TopCo of Scheme Shares under the terms of this Scheme, each Eligible Shareholder will be entitled to receive the Scheme Consideration in respect of each of their Scheme Shares in accordance with this clause 4. |
(b) | Subject to clauses 4.3 to 4.7, the Scheme Consideration to be provided to each Eligible Shareholder will be: |
(i) | where the Eligible Shareholder is: |
(A) | not a Share Electing Shareholder; |
(B) | not an Eligible Canadian Branch Shareholder unless the Eligible Shareholder is a CDI Electing Shareholder; or |
(C) | the Sale Nominee, |
(ii) | where the Eligible Shareholder is: |
(A) | a Share Electing Shareholder; or |
(B) | an Eligible Canadian Branch Shareholder who is not a CDI Electing Shareholder; and |
4.3 | Provision of Scheme Consideration |
(a) | on the Scheme Implementation Date (or, in the case of sub-paragraphs (C), (D), (E) and (F) of clause 4.3(a)(iii), by no later than the Business Day following the Scheme Implementation Date): |
(i) | issue to each Eligible Shareholder (or procure the issue to each Eligible Shareholder of) the applicable Scheme Consideration in accordance with this Scheme; |
(ii) | in the case of Scheme Consideration that is required to be provided to Eligible Shareholders in the form of Consideration Shares, procure that the name and address of each relevant Eligible Shareholder is entered in the New TopCo Share Register as the holder of the applicable Consideration Shares (being the name and Registered Address of the relevant Eligible Shareholder as at the Scheme Record Date); and |
(iii) | in the case of Scheme Consideration that is required to be provided to Eligible Shareholders in the form of Consideration CDIs: |
(A) | issue to CDN (or to a custodian who will hold the New TopCo Shares on CDN's behalf) to be held on trust that number of New TopCo Shares that will enable CDN to issue Consideration CDIs as contemplated by this clause 4.3; |
(B) | procure that the name and address of CDN or of its custodian (as applicable) is entered into the New TopCo Share Register in respect of those New TopCo Shares underlying the Consideration CDIs, and that a share certificate or holding statement (or equivalent document) in the name of CDN representing those New TopCo Shares is sent to CDN; |
(C) | procure that CDN issues to each relevant Eligible Shareholder the number of Consideration CDIs to which it is entitled under this clause 4.3; and |
(D) | procure that the name and address of each relevant Eligible Shareholder is entered in the records maintained by CDN or its custodian (as applicable) or both, as the holder of the Consideration CDIs issued to that Eligible Shareholder; |
(E) | in the case of each such Eligible Shareholder who held Scheme Shares on the CHESS subregister, procure that the Consideration CDIs are held on the CHESS subregister; and |
(F) | in the case of each such Eligible Shareholder who held Scheme Shares on the issuer sponsored subregister, the Consideration CDIs are held on the issuer sponsored subregister; and |
(b) | no later than one Business Day after the Scheme Implementation Date, send or procure the dispatch to each Eligible Shareholder, to their Registered Address as at the Scheme Record Date (or, in the case of the Sale Nominee, as specified in the Ineligible Share Transfer), a securities certificate, holding statement or allotment confirmation representing the Consideration Shares or Consideration CDIs (as applicable) issued to that Eligible Shareholder. |
4.4 | Ineligible Overseas Shareholders |
(a) | New TopCo has no obligation to issue, and will not issue, any Scheme Consideration under this Scheme to any Ineligible Overseas Shareholder. |
(b) | Allkem must: |
(i) | prior to the First Court Hearing, appoint the Sale Nominee; |
(ii) | ensure that, under the Terms of Appointment, the Sale Nominee irrevocably undertakes to and is otherwise obliged to do all such things required by this clause 4.4 of this Scheme (including, but not limited to, under clause 4.4(c)); and |
(iii) | procure that the Sale Nominee: |
(A) | performs all acts attributed to it under this clause 4.4; and |
(B) | otherwise does all things necessary to give effect to this clause 4.4. |
(c) | After the Scheme Record Date, and prior to Scheme Implementation, all of the Allkem Shares which were held by Ineligible Overseas Shareholders as at the Scheme Record Date (each an Ineligible Share and together the Ineligible Shares), together with all rights and entitlements attaching to those Ineligible Shares, will be transferred to the Sale Nominee: |
(i) | without the need for any further act by any Ineligible Overseas Shareholder (other than acts performed by Allkem or its directors or officers as attorney and agent for the Ineligible Overseas Shareholders); and |
(ii) | on the basis that, if (1) the Scheme lapses under clause 2.4, or (2) Scheme Implementation has not occurred within 5 Business Days after the Scheme Record Date (or such later time determined by Allkem in its sole discretion), (each a Return Event), the Sale Nominee must return the Ineligible Consideration Shares to the relevant Ineligible Overseas Shareholders as soon as reasonably practicable (and in any event, no later than 15 Business Days after the date on which Allkem gives written notice of the Return Event to the Sale Nominee) without any cost incurred by or fee payable to the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder. |
(d) | Allkem must procure that the Sale Nominee accepts the transfer of the Ineligible Shares under clause 4.4(c) by immediately executing the Ineligible Share Transfer as transferee and delivering it to Allkem for registration. |
(e) | In order to give effect to the transfer of Ineligible Shares to the Sale Nominee under clause 4.4(c), Allkem will: |
(i) | as attorney and agent for each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, execute the Ineligible Share Transfer provided under clause 4.4(d); and |
(ii) | register the transfer of the Ineligible Shares to the Sale Nominee and enter the name of the Sale Nominee in the Allkem Share Register in respect of all of the Ineligible Shares transferred under clause 4.4(c). |
(f) | Allkem must procure that the Sale Nominee, and must enforce its contractual rights to ensure that the Sale Nominee: |
(i) | sells the CDIs issued as Scheme Consideration in respect of the Ineligible Shares (Ineligible Consideration CDIs) (on ASX or off-market) as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event no more than 15 Business Days after the Scheme Implementation Date, in the manner, and on the terms, the Sale Nominee determines in good faith (and at the risk of the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder); and |
(ii) | as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event no more than 10 Business Days after settlement of all the sales of the Ineligible Consideration CDIs under clause 4.4(f)(i), remits to Allkem the Net Proceeds. |
(g) | Promptly after receipt of the Net Proceeds, Allkem must pay each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, or procure the payment to each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder of, such proportion of the Net Proceeds to which that Ineligible Overseas Shareholder is entitled (rounded down to the nearest cent), to be determined in accordance with the following formula: |
(h) | The Net Proceeds will be payable to Ineligible Overseas Shareholders in Australian dollars. |
(i) | Each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder acknowledges and agrees that: |
(i) | none of Allkem, Livent, New TopCo or the Sale Nominee give any assurance as to the price or foreign exchange rate that will be achieved for the sale of the Ineligible Consideration CDIs described in clause 4.4(f); and |
(ii) | Allkem, Livent, New TopCo and the Sale Nominee each expressly disclaim any fiduciary duty to any Ineligible Overseas Shareholder that may arise in connection with this clause 4.4. |
(j) | Allkem must pay or procure that each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder is paid any amounts owing under clause 4.4(g) by either (in the absolute discretion of Allkem): |
(i) | where an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder has, before the Scheme Record Date, made a valid election in accordance with the requirements of the Allkem Share Registry to receive dividend payments from Allkem by electronic funds transfer to a bank account nominated by the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, paying, or procuring the payment of, the relevant amount in Australian currency by electronic means in accordance with that election; or |
(ii) | dispatching, or procuring the dispatch of, a cheque for the relevant amount in Australian currency to the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder by prepaid post to their Registered Address (as at the Scheme Record Date), such cheque being drawn in the name of the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder (in the case of joint holders, the cheque will be drawn in the name of the joint holders and dispatched in accordance with the procedures set out in clause 4.6(b)). |
(k) | Each Ineligible Overseas Shareholder appoints Allkem, and each director and officer of Allkem, as its agent to receive on its behalf any financial services guide (or similar or equivalent document) and any other notices (including any updates of those documents) that the Sale Nominee is required to provide to Ineligible Overseas Shareholders under the Corporations Act or any other applicable law. |
(l) | Payment of the relevant amounts calculated in accordance with clauses 4.4(g) to an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder in accordance with this clause 4.4 satisfies in full New TopCo’s obligations to the Ineligible Overseas Shareholder under this Scheme in respect of the Scheme Consideration. |
4.5 | Other ineligible Scheme Shareholders |
(a) | Where the issue of Scheme Consideration to which an Eligible Shareholder would otherwise be entitled under this Scheme would result in a breach of law: |
(i) | New TopCo will issue the maximum possible Scheme Consideration to that Eligible Shareholder without giving rise to such a breach; and |
(ii) | any further Scheme Consideration to which that Eligible Shareholder is entitled, but the issue of which to that Eligible Shareholder would give rise to such a breach, will instead be issued to the Sale Nominee and dealt with under clause 4.4, as if: |
(A) | references to “Ineligible Overseas Shareholders” also included that Eligible Shareholder; and |
(B) | references to “Ineligible Consideration CDIs” also included any of that Eligible Shareholder’s Scheme Consideration that has been issued to the Sale Nominee. |
(b) | Where the issue of Scheme Consideration to the Sale Nominee under this Scheme would result in a breach of law, Allkem must use its reasonable best efforts to appoint another person as the Sale Nominee in accordance with clause 4.4. |
4.6 | Joint holders |
(a) | any Scheme Consideration will be issued to and registered in the names of the joint holders; and |
(b) | any other document required to be sent under this Scheme will be forwarded to the holder whose name appears first in the Allkem Share Register as at the Scheme Record Date or to the joint holders. |
4.7 | Orders of a court or Governmental Entity |
(a) | If New TopCo or Allkem (or the Allkem Share Registry) receives written notice of an order or direction made by a court of competent jurisdiction or by a Governmental Entity that: |
(i) | requires consideration to be provided to a third party (either through payment of a sum or the issuance of a security) in respect of Scheme Shares held by a particular Eligible Shareholder, which would otherwise be payable or required to be issued to that Eligible Shareholder by Allkem or New TopCo in accordance with this clause 4 (including in connection with any withholding or deduction under clauses 4.7(b)), then Allkem or New TopCo (as applicable) will be entitled to procure that provision of that consideration is made in accordance with that order or direction; or |
(ii) | prevents Allkem or New TopCo from providing consideration to any particular Scheme Shareholder in accordance with this clause 4, or the payment or issuance of such consideration is otherwise prohibited by applicable law, Allkem or New TopCo (as applicable) will be entitled to: |
(A) | in the case of any Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, retain an amount, in Australian dollars, equal to the relevant Ineligible Overseas Shareholder's share of any proceeds of sale received by Allkem pursuant to clause 4.4; and |
(B) | not issue (or, in the case of Allkem, direct New TopCo not to issue), or issue (or, in the case of Allkem, direct New TopCo to issue) to a permitted trustee or nominee, such Scheme Consideration as that Scheme Shareholder would otherwise be entitled to under clause 4.3, |
(b) | New TopCo and Allkem (as applicable) may deduct and withhold from any consideration that would otherwise be provided to a Scheme Shareholder in accordance with this clause 4, any amount that New TopCo or Allkem (as applicable) determines is required to be deducted and withheld from that consideration under any applicable law, including any order, direction or notice made or given by a court of competent jurisdiction or by another Government Entity. |
(c) | To the extent that amounts are so deducted or withheld, such deducted or withheld amounts will be treated for all purposes under this Scheme as having been paid to the person in respect of which such deduction and withholding was made, provided that such deducted or withheld amounts are actually remitted to the appropriate taxing agency. |
(d) | To avoid doubt, any payment or retention by Allkem or New TopCo (as applicable) under clauses 4.7(a), 4.7(b) and 4.7(c) will constitute the full discharge of New TopCo’s obligations under clause 4.3 with respect to the amount so paid or retained until, in the case of clause 4.7(a)(ii), the amount is no longer required to be retained. |
4.8 | Consideration Shares to rank equally |
(a) | the Consideration Shares to be issued (including the New TopCo Shares underlying the Consideration CDIs) as the Scheme Consideration will, on issue: |
(i) | be duly issued and fully paid in accordance with applicable laws and the memorandum and articles of association of New TopCo; |
(ii) | be free from any Encumbrances, pledges and interests of third parties of any kind, whether legal or otherwise, or restriction on transfer of any kind, other than as provided for in the memorandum and articles of association of New TopCo or as required under applicable law; and |
(iii) | rank equally in all respects, including for future dividends, with all existing New TopCo Shares then on issue; and |
(b) | it will apply for, or has applied for: |
(i) | the listing of the Consideration Shares on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance; |
(ii) | admission of New TopCo to the official list of ASX (as a foreign exempt listing) commencing on the Business Day following the Scheme Effective Date; and |
(iii) | official quotation of the Consideration CDIs on ASX, subject to customary conditions, commencing: |
(A) | on the Business Day following the Scheme Effective Date (or such later day as ASX may require) until the Scheme Implementation Date, on a deferred settlement basis; and |
(B) | on the Business Day following the Scheme Implementation Date, on an ordinary (T+2) basis. |
4.9 | Unclaimed monies |
(a) | Allkem may cancel a cheque issued under clause 4.4(j)(ii) if the cheque: |
(i) | is returned to Allkem; or |
(ii) | has not been presented for payment within 6 months after the date on which the cheque was sent. |
(b) | During the period of 12 months commencing on the Scheme Implementation Date, on request in writing from a Scheme Shareholder to Allkem (or the Allkem Share Registry) (which request may not be made until the date that is 20 Business Days after the Scheme Implementation Date), Allkem must reissue a cheque that was previously cancelled under clause 4.9(a). |
(c) | The Unclaimed Money Act will apply in relation to any Scheme Consideration that becomes “unclaimed money” (as defined in section 6 of the Unclaimed Money Act). |
4.10 | Title to and rights in Scheme Shares |
(a) | Immediately upon the provision of the Scheme Consideration to each Eligible Shareholder in accordance with this clause 4, New TopCo will be beneficially entitled to the Scheme Shares transferred to it under this Scheme pending registration by Allkem of the name and address of New TopCo in the Allkem Share Register as the holder of the Scheme Shares. |
(b) | To the extent permitted by law, the Scheme Shares (including all rights and entitlements attaching to the Scheme Shares) transferred under this Scheme to New TopCo will, at the time of transfer to New TopCo, vest in New TopCo free from all: |
(i) | Encumbrances, pledges and interests of third parties of any kind, whether legal or otherwise; and |
(ii) | restrictions on transfer of any kind. |
(c) | To avoid doubt, notwithstanding clause 4.10(a), to the extent that clause 4.7(a) applies to any Eligible Shareholder, New TopCo will be beneficially entitled to any Scheme Shares held by that Eligible Shareholder immediately upon compliance with clause 4.7 on the Scheme Implementation Date as if New TopCo had provided the Scheme Consideration to that Eligible Shareholder. |
5 | DEALINGS IN ALLKEM SHARES |
5.1 | Allkem Share dealings that are recognised |
(a) | in the case of dealings of the type to be effected using CHESS, the transferee is registered in the Allkem Share Register as the holder of the relevant Allkem Shares as at the Scheme Record Date; and |
(b) | in all other cases, registrable transfers or transmission applications in respect of those dealings, or valid requests in respect of other alternations, are received by the Allkem Share Registry at or before the Scheme Record Date, |
5.2 | Allkem to register transfer and transmission applications |
5.3 | Transfers received after Scheme Record Date not recognised |
5.4 | Allkem to maintain Allkem Share Register to determine entitlements |
(a) | In order to determine entitlements to the Scheme Consideration, Allkem must maintain, or procure the maintenance of, the Allkem Share Register in accordance with this clause 5 until the Scheme Consideration has been paid to Scheme Shareholders and New TopCo has been entered into the Allkem Share Register as the holder of the Scheme Shares. |
(b) | The Allkem Share Register in this form will solely determine entitlements to the Scheme Consideration. |
5.5 | Holding statements no effect from Scheme Record Date |
(a) | All holding statements for Allkem Shares (other than any holding statements (1) in favour of the Sale Nominee with respect to the Ineligible shares or (2) in favour of New TopCo) will cease to have effect as documents of title (or evidence thereof) after the Scheme Record Date. |
(b) | Each entry on the Allkem Share Register at and from the Scheme Record Date (other than those entries in respect of New TopCo or a transfer in accordance with clause 4.4(c) to the Sale Nominee) will cease to have any effect other than as evidence of an entitlement to the Scheme Consideration in respect of the Scheme Shares relating to that entry. |
5.6 | Allkem to provide contact information for Scheme Shareholders |
5.7 | Suspension of trading |
5.8 | Termination of official quotation |
(a) | to ASX, for: |
(i) | removal of Allkem from the official list of ASX; and |
(ii) | termination of the official quotation of Allkem Shares on ASX; |
(b) | to TSX for the delisting of Allkem from TSX with effect on and from the close of trading on the Scheme Effective Date, or such other date as Livent and Allkem may agree, acting reasonably, following consultation with TSX. |
6 | GENERAL PROVISIONS |
6.1 | Allkem giving effect to the Scheme |
6.2 | Scheme Shareholders' agreements and consents |
(a) | agrees for all purposes to: |
(i) | in the case of Ineligible Overseas Shareholders, the transfer of their Ineligible Shares to the Sale Nominee; |
(ii) | in the case of Eligible Shareholders: |
(A) | become a member of New TopCo; |
(B) | in the case of Eligible Shareholders who are issued Consideration CDIs pursuant to this Scheme, to have their name entered in the records maintained by CDN or its custodian (as applicable) or both, as the holder of CDIs; |
(C) | in the case of Eligible Shareholders who are issued Consideration Shares pursuant to this Scheme, to have their name registered in the New TopCo Share Register as a holder of New TopCo Shares; and |
(D) | be bound by the memorandum of association and articles of association of New TopCo; and |
(iii) | in the case of Eligible Shareholders, the transfer of their Scheme Shares, together with all rights and entitlements attaching to those Scheme Shares, to New TopCo, in each case, in accordance with this Scheme; |
(b) | agrees for all purposes and to the extent permitted by law, that all instructions, notifications or elections made by the Scheme Shareholder or the Sale Nominee to Allkem (binding or deemed to be binding between the Scheme Shareholder and Allkem) relating to Allkem or its securities (except for tax file numbers), including instructions, notifications or elections relating to: |
(i) | whether distributions or dividends are to be paid by cheque or into a specific account; and |
(ii) | notices or other communications from Allkem, |
(c) | agrees to the variation, cancellation or modification of the rights attached to their Scheme Shares constituted by or resulting from, and in accordance with, this Scheme; |
(d) | acknowledges that this Scheme binds Allkem, all Scheme Shareholders (including those who did not attend the Scheme Meeting and those who did not vote, or voted against this Scheme, at the Scheme Meeting) and the Sale Nominee; |
(e) | consents to Allkem, New TopCo and Livent doing all things (including executing all deeds, instruments, transfers or other documents) as may be necessary or desirable to give full effect to this Scheme and the transactions contemplated by it; and |
(f) | acknowledges and agrees that Allkem, as agent of each Scheme Shareholder and of the Sale Nominee, may sub–delegate its functions under this Scheme to any of its directors and officers, jointly and severally, |
6.3 | Scheme Shareholders' warranties |
(a) | Each Scheme Shareholder and the Sale Nominee is taken to have warranted to Allkem and New TopCo (and, in the case of an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, to the Sale Nominee), and to have appointed and authorised Allkem as its attorney and agent to warrant to New TopCo (and, in the case of an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, to the Sale Nominee), that: |
(i) | all their Allkem Shares (including any rights and entitlements attaching to their Allkem Shares) that are transferred under this Scheme will, at the time of their transfer, be fully paid and free from all: |
(A) | Encumbrances, pledges and interests of third parties of any kind, whether legal or otherwise; and |
(B) | restrictions on transfer of any kind; |
(ii) | they have full power and capacity to transfer their Allkem Shares to New TopCo (or, in the case of Ineligible Overseas Shareholders, to the Sale Nominee), together with any rights and entitlements attaching to those Allkem Shares, under this Scheme; and |
(iii) | as at the Scheme Record Date, they have no existing right to be issued any other Allkem Shares or any other form of securities in Allkem. |
(b) | Allkem undertakes in favour of each Scheme Shareholder (and, in the case of an Ineligible Overseas Shareholder, for the Sale Nominee) that it will provide such warranty to New TopCo as agent and attorney of each Scheme Shareholder. |
6.4 | Appointment of Allkem as attorney of Scheme Shareholders and Sale Nominee |
(a) | execute any document or do any other act necessary, expedient or incidental to give full effect to this Scheme and the transactions contemplated by it, including executing and delivering the Scheme Transfer under clause 3.2 and the Ineligible Share Transfer under clause 4.4; and |
(b) | enforce the Deed Poll against New TopCo, and Allkem accepts such appointment in respect of itself and on behalf of each of its directors and officers. |
6.5 | Appointment of New TopCo as agent, attorney and sole proxy in respect of Scheme Shares |
(a) | irrevocably appoints New TopCo as its attorney and agent (and directs New TopCo as its attorney and agent to appoint any of the directors and officers of New TopCo as its sole proxy and, where applicable, corporate representative, of that Eligible Shareholder) to: |
(i) | attend shareholders' meetings of Allkem; |
(ii) | exercise the votes attaching to the Scheme Shares registered in the name of the Eligible Shareholder; and |
(iii) | sign any Allkem Shareholders' resolution (whether in person, by proxy or by corporate representative); |
(b) | must take all other action in the capacity of a registered holder of Scheme Shares as New TopCo reasonably directs; |
(c) | undertake not to attend or vote at any shareholders' meetings of Allkem or sign any Allkem Shareholders' resolution (whether in person, by proxy or by corporate representative) other than pursuant to clause 6.5(a); and |
(d) | acknowledges and agrees that in exercising the powers conferred by clause 6.5(a), New TopCo and any director, officer or agent nominated by New TopCo may act in the best interests of New TopCo as the intended registered holder of the Scheme Shares. |
6.6 | Binding effect of Scheme |
(a) | This Scheme binds Allkem, all of the Scheme Shareholders (including those who did not attend the Scheme Meeting and those who did not vote, or voted against this Scheme, at the Scheme Meeting) and the Sale Nominee and, to the extent of any inconsistency, overrides the constitution of Allkem. |
(b) | Any covenant from any Scheme Shareholder or the Sale Nominee in favour of New TopCo or any obligation owed by any Scheme Shareholder or the Sale Nominee to New TopCo will be enforceable by New TopCo against such person directly and, to the extent necessary, may enforce such rights through Allkem as party to the Scheme. |
6.7 | No liability when acting in good faith |
6.8 | Deed Poll |
6.9 | Notices |
(a) | Where a notice, transfer, transmission application, direction or other communication referred to in this Scheme is sent by post to Allkem, it will be deemed to be received on the date (if any) on which it is actually received at Allkem's registered office or at the Allkem Share Registry and on no other date. |
(b) | The accidental omission to give notice of the Scheme Meeting or the non-receipt of such notice by an Allkem Shareholder will not, unless so ordered by the Court, invalidate the Scheme Meeting or the proceedings of the Scheme Meeting. |
6.10 | Stamp duty |
6.11 | Governing law |
(a) | This Scheme and any dispute arising out of or in connection with the subject matter of this Scheme is governed by the laws of Western Australia. |
(b) | Each party irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia (Western Australian registry) and of the courts competent to determine appeals from that court with respect to any proceedings that may be brought at any time arising out of or in connection with the subject matter of this Scheme. Each party irrevocably waives any objection to the venue of any legal process in these courts on the basis that the process has been brought in any inconvenient forum. |
1. | The name of the Company is [•] plc. |
2. | The Company is a public company limited by shares. |
3. | The Company is a par value company. |
4. | The Company has unrestricted corporate capacity. |
5. | The liability of each member arising from his or her holding of a share is limited to the amount (if any) unpaid on it. |
6. | The share capital of the Company is US$[•] divided into [•] ordinary shares of US$[•] each and [•] preferred shares of US$[•] each. |
| | Table of Contents | |||||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | |
| | Table of Contents | |||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | |
| | Table of Contents | |||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | |
Definitions and interpretation |
(a) | The meanings of the terms used in these articles are set out below. |
Term | | | Meaning |
Acting Chairperson | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 7.7(d). |
affiliate | | | a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, another person. |
annual general meeting | | | an annual general meeting of the Company that the Companies Law requires to be held. |
Board | | | the directors for the time being of the Company or those directors who are present at a meeting at which there is a quorum. |
Business Day | | | has the meaning given to that term in the listing rules of the New York Stock Exchange. |
CDI | | | means a CHESS depositary interest that represents a beneficial ownership in a share in the Company registered in the name of CDI Nominee (or in the name of a nominee or custodian who will hold the shares in the Company on CDI Nominee’s behalf). |
CDI Nominee | | | means CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty Limited (ACN 071 346 506). |
CHESS | | | the Clearing House Electronic Subregister System operated by ASX Settlement Pty Ltd. |
Companies Law | | | the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991. |
Control, including the terms controlling, controlled by and under common control with | | | the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a person, whether through the ownership of voting shares, by contract or otherwise. A person who is the owner of 20% or more of the outstanding voting shares of any corporation, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity shall be presumed to have control of such entity, in the absence of proof by a preponderance of the evidence to the contrary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a presumption of control shall not apply where such person holds voting shares, in good faith and not for the purpose of circumventing this provision, as an agent, bank, broker, nominee, custodian or trustee for one or more owners who do not individually or as a group have control of such entity. |
CREST Order | | | the Companies (Uncertificated Securities) (Jersey) Order 1999, as amended from time to time, including any provisions of or under the Companies Law which alter or replace such regulations. |
Default Shares | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 6.2(a). |
Derivative Security | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 7.3(f)(3). |
Designated Stock Exchange | | | the New York Stock Exchange, the Australian Securities Exchange or any other stock exchange or automated quotation system on which the Company’s securities are then traded. |
directors | | | the directors of the Company. |
Term | | | Meaning |
distribution | | | has the meaning given to that expression in Article 114 of the Companies Law. |
dividend | | | any dividend (whether interim or final) resolved to be paid on shares pursuant to these articles. |
DTC | | | the Depositary Trust Company or any successor company. |
DTC Depositary | | | Cede & Co. and/or any other custodian, depositary or nominee of DTC which holds shares under arrangements that facilitate the holding and trading of beneficial interests in ordinary shares in the DTC System. |
DTC Proxy | | | in relation to any shares held by the DTC Depositary, any person who is, for the purposes of any general meeting or resolution, appointed a proxy (whether by way of instrument of proxy, power of attorney, mandate or otherwise) by: a) the DTC Depositary; or b) a proxy, attorney or other agent appointed by any other person whose authority is ultimately derived (whether directly or indirectly) from the DTC Depositary. |
DTC System | | | the electronic system operated by DTC by which title to securities or interests in securities may be evidenced and transferred in dematerialised form. |
Exchange Act | | | the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
Exemption Order | | | the Companies (Transfers of Shares – Exemptions) (Jersey) Order 2014 as amended from time to time, including any provisions of or under the Companies Law which alter or replace such regulations. |
extraordinary general meeting | | | any general meeting of the Company other than the annual general meeting. |
Liabilities | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 11.2. |
Listing Rules | | | the listing rules of the Designated Stock Exchange. |
Officer | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 11.1. |
public announcement | | | disclosure in a press release reported by Dow Jones News Service, Associated Press or a comparable national news service in the United States or in a document publicly filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to sections 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. |
Record Time | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 7.4. |
Representative | | | in relation to a member that is a body corporate means a person authorised by the body corporate to act as its representative at the meeting. |
Seal | | | any common seal, duplicate seal or certificate seal of the Company. |
share | | | means shares in the Company. |
special resolution | | | a resolution of the Company passed as a special resolution in accordance with the Companies Law. |
Statement of Rights | | | has the meaning given to that term in article 2.4. |
Transmission Event | | | 1 for a member who is an individual – the member’s death, the member’s bankruptcy, or a member becoming of unsound mind, or a person who, or whose estate, is liable to be dealt with in any way under the laws relating to mental health; and |
Term | | | Meaning |
| | 2 for a member who is a body corporate – the insolvency, bankruptcy or dissolution of the member or the succession by another body corporate to the assets and liabilities of the member. | |
Uncertificated | | | in relation to a share, means a share title to which is recorded in the register as being held in uncertificated form and title to which, by virtue of the CREST Order, may be transferred by means of a relevant system. |
(b) | A reference in these articles to a partly paid share is a reference to a share on which there is an amount unpaid. |
(c) | A reference in these articles to an amount unpaid on a share includes a reference to any amount of the issue price which is unpaid. |
(d) | A reference in these articles to a call or an amount called on a share includes a reference to a sum that, by the terms of issue of a share, becomes payable on issue or at a fixed date. |
(e) | Except where a special resolution or another percentage is specified, a reference to a resolution or ordinary resolution of the Company is a reference to a resolution passed by a majority of votes cast by the members present at a general meeting. |
(f) | A reference in these articles to a member for the purposes of a meeting of members is a reference to a registered holder of shares as at the relevant Record Time. |
(g) | A reference in these articles to a member present at a general meeting is a reference to a member present in person, electronically in accordance with article 7.5(d) or by proxy, attorney or Representative. |
(h) | A chairperson or deputy chairperson appointed under these articles may be referred to as chairman or chairwoman, or deputy chairman or chairwoman, or as chair, if applicable. |
(i) | A reference in these articles to a person holding or occupying a particular office or position is a reference to any person who occupies or performs the duties of that office or position. |
(j) | A reference to a document being ‘signed’ or to ‘signature’ includes that document being executed under hand or under seal or by any other method and, in the case of a communication in electronic form, includes the document being authenticated in accordance with the Companies Law or any other method approved by the Board. |
(k) | Unless the contrary intention appears, in these articles: |
(1) | the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular; |
(2) | words that refer to any gender include all genders; |
(3) | words used to refer to persons generally include natural persons as well as bodies corporate, bodies politic, partnerships, joint ventures, associations, boards, groups or other bodies (whether or not the body is incorporated); |
(4) | a reference to a person includes that person’s successors and legal personal representatives; |
(5) | a reference to a statute or regulation, or a provision of any of them includes all statutes, regulations or provisions amending, consolidating or replacing them, and a reference to a statute includes all regulations, proclamations, ordinances and by-laws issued under that statute; |
(6) | a reference to the Listing Rules includes any variation, consolidation, amendment or replacement of those rules and is to be taken to be subject to any applicable waiver or exemption; and |
(7) | where a word or phrase is given a particular meaning, other parts of speech and grammatical forms of that word or phrase have corresponding meanings. |
(l) | Specifying anything in these articles after the words ‘including’, ‘includes’ or ‘for example’ or similar expressions does not limit what else is included unless there is express wording to the contrary. |
(m) | In these articles, headings and bold type are only for convenience and do not affect the meaning of these articles. |
(a) | The Company may, in any way the Companies Law permits: |
(1) | exercise any power; |
(2) | take any action; or |
(3) | engage in any conduct or procedure; |
(b) | Where these articles provide that a person ‘may’ do a particular act or thing, the act or thing may be done at the person’s discretion. |
(c) | Where these articles confer a power to do a particular act or thing, the power is, unless the contrary intention appears, to be taken as including a power exercisable in the same way and subject to the same conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend or vary that act or thing. |
(d) | Where these articles confer a power to do a particular act or thing, the power may be exercised from time to time and may be exercised subject to conditions. |
(e) | Where these articles confer a power to do a particular act or thing concerning particular matters, the power is, unless the contrary intention appears, to be taken to include a power to do that act or thing as to only some of those matters or as to a particular class of those matters, and to make different provision concerning different matters or different classes of matters. |
(f) | Where these articles confer a power to make appointments to an office or position (except the power to appoint a director under article 8.1(b)), the power is, unless the contrary intention appears, to be taken to include a power: |
(1) | to appoint a person to act in the office or position until a person is formally appointed to the office or position; |
(2) | to remove or suspend any person appointed (without prejudice to any rights or obligations under any contract between the person and the Company); and |
(3) | to appoint another person temporarily in the place of any person removed or suspended or in the place of any sick or absent holder of the office or position. |
(g) | Where these articles give power to a person to delegate a function or power: |
(1) | the delegation may be concurrent with, or (except in the case of a delegation by the Board) to the exclusion of, the performance or exercise of that function or power by the person; |
(2) | the delegation may be either general or limited in any way provided in the terms of delegation; |
(3) | the delegation need not be to a specified person but may be to any person holding, occupying or performing the duties of a specified office or position; |
(4) | the delegation may include the power to delegate; and |
(5) | where performing or exercising that function or power depends on that person’s opinion, belief or state of mind about a matter, that function or power may be performed or exercised by the delegate on the delegate’s opinion, belief or state of mind about that matter. |
(a) | The share capital of the Company is as specified in the Memorandum of Association and the shares of the Company shall have the rights and be subject to the conditions contained in these articles and, to the extent applicable, in the Statement of Rights relating to preferred shares of any class. |
(b) | Subject to these articles, the Board may, from time to time in its discretion: |
(1) | issue, allot or grant options for, or otherwise dispose of, shares in the Company; and |
(2) | decide: |
(A) | the persons to whom shares are issued or options are granted; |
(B) | the terms on which shares are issued or options are granted; and |
(C) | the rights and restrictions attached to those shares or options. |
(a) | As regards income – Each ordinary share confers on the holder thereof the right to receive such profits of the Company available for distribution as the Board may declare after any payment to the members holding shares of any other class other than ordinary shares of any amount then payable in accordance with the relevant Statement of Rights or other terms of issue of that class. |
(b) | As regards capital – If the Company is wound up, the holder of an ordinary share is entitled, following payment to the members holding shares of any other class other than ordinary shares of all amounts then payable to them in accordance with the relevant Statement of Rights or other terms of issue of that class, to repayment of the stated amount of the capital paid up thereon and thereafter any surplus assets of the Company then remaining shall be distributed pari passu among the holders of the ordinary shares in proportion to the amounts paid up thereon. |
(c) | As regards voting – At any general meeting of the Company and any separate class meeting of the holders of ordinary shares, every person who was a holder of ordinary shares at the Record Time and who is present at such meeting has one vote for every ordinary share of which such person was the holder as of the Record Time. |
(d) | As regards redemption – the ordinary shares are not redeemable, unless issued as redeemable or converted into redeemable ordinary shares pursuant to article 2.6. |
(a) | the series or class to which each preferred share shall belong, such series or class to be designated with a series or class number and, if the Board so determines, title; |
(b) | details of any dividends payable in respect of the relevant series or class, if any, including whether such dividends will be cumulative or noncumulative, the dividend rate of such series or class, and the dates and preferences of dividends on such series or class; |
(c) | details of rights attaching to shares of the relevant series or class to receive a return of capital on a winding up of the Company; |
(d) | details of the voting rights attaching to shares of the relevant series or class (which may provide, without limitation, that each preferred share shall have more than one vote on a poll at any general meeting of the Company); |
(e) | a statement as to whether shares of the relevant series or class are redeemable (either at the option of the holder and/or the Company) and, if so, on what terms such shares are redeemable (including, and only if so determined by the Board, the amount for which such shares shall be redeemed (or a method or formula for determining the same) and the date on which they shall be redeemed); |
(f) | a statement as to whether shares of the relevant series or class are convertible into, or exchangeable for, shares of any other class or classes or of any other series of the same or any other class or classes of shares, or any other security, of the Company or any other person (in each case, either at the option of the holder and/or the Company) and, if so, on what rates or terms such shares are convertible or exchangeable; |
(g) | the right, if any, to subscribe for or to purchase any securities of the Company or any other person; |
(h) | any other designations, powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other rights, obligations and restrictions, if any, attaching to preferred shares of any class or series as the Board may determine in its discretion; and/or |
(i) | the price at which shares of the relevant series or class shall be issued. |
(a) | it is binding on members and the Board as if contained in these articles; |
(b) | it must be filed on behalf of the Company with the Registrar of Companies in Jersey in accordance with the Companies Law; |
(c) | the provisions of article 2.11 apply to any variation or abrogation thereof that may be effected by the Company or the Board; and |
(d) | upon the redemption of a preferred share (if it is redeemable) pursuant to the Statement of Rights relating thereto, the holder thereof ceases to be entitled to any rights in respect thereof and accordingly such holder’s name must be removed from the register of members and the share must thereupon be cancelled. |
(a) | issue; or |
(b) | convert existing non-redeemable shares, whether issued or not, into, shares that are to be redeemed, or are liable to be redeemed, either in accordance with their terms or at the option of the Company and/or at the option of the holder; provided that an issued non-redeemable share may only be converted into a redeemable share pursuant to article 2.6(b) with the agreement of the applicable holder (which agreement shall be deemed to exist with respect to any non-redeemable shares tendered by such holder for conversion, repurchase, buy back or redemption and regardless of whether or not such holder is aware that the Company is the purchaser of such shares in such transaction) or pursuant to a special resolution. |
(a) | Subject to the Companies Law, the Company may, in the Board’s discretion, issue fractions of a share of any class. |
(b) | A fraction of a share shall be subject to and carry the corresponding fraction of liabilities (whether with respect to calls or otherwise), limitations, preferences, privileges, qualifications, restrictions, rights and other attributes of a share of that class of shares. |
(a) | making cash payments; |
(b) | determining that fractions may be disregarded to adjust the rights of all members; |
(c) | appointing a trustee to deal with any fractions on behalf of members; and |
(d) | rounding down or rounding up each fractional entitlement to the nearest whole share. |
(a) | Subject to article 2.11 and the provisions of the Companies Law, the Company may by special resolution convert or reclassify shares from one class to another. |
(b) | Notwithstanding article 2.11 but subject to the Companies Law, the Board may convert or reclassify any previously classified but unissued shares of any existing class from time to time in one or more existing classes of shares without the approval of members of the Company. |
(a) | The rights attached to any class of shares may, unless their terms of issue state otherwise, be varied by a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of shares of the class. |
(b) | The provisions of these articles relating to general meetings apply, with necessary changes, to separate class meetings as if they were general meetings. |
(c) | The rights conferred on the holders of any class of shares are to be taken as not having been varied by the creation or issue of further shares ranking ahead, after or pari passu with them, unless the terms of issue provide otherwise. |
(d) | The rights conferred upon the holders of ordinary shares are to be taken as not having been varied by the creation, issue, redemption or conversion of any preferred shares. |
(a) | The Board is hereby authorised to establish a shareholder rights plan including approving the execution of any document relating to the adoption and/or implementation of a rights plan. A rights plan may be in such form and may be subject to such terms and conditions as the Board shall determine in its absolute discretion. |
(b) | The Board is hereby authorised to grant rights to subscribe for shares of the Company in accordance with a rights plan. |
(c) | The Board may, in accordance with a rights plan, exercise any power under such rights plan (including a power relating to the issuance, redemption or exchange of rights or shares) on a basis that excludes one or more members, including a member who has acquired or may acquire a significant interest in or control of the Company. |
(d) | The Board is authorised to exercise the powers under this article 2.12 for any purpose that the Board, in its discretion, deems reasonable and appropriate, including, without limitation, to ensure that: |
(1) | any process which may result in an acquisition of a significant interest or change of control of the Company is conducted in an orderly manner; |
(2) | all holders of ordinary shares will be treated fairly and in a similar manner; |
(3) | any potential acquisition of a significant interest or change of control of the Company which would be unlikely to treat all members of the Company fairly and in a similar manner would be prevented; |
(4) | the use of abusive tactics by any person in connection with any potential acquisition of a significant interest or change of control of the Company would be prevented; |
(5) | an optimum price for shares would be received by or on behalf of all members of the Company; |
(6) | the success of the Company would be promoted for the benefit of its members as a whole; |
(7) | the long-term interests of the Company, its employees, its members and its business would be safeguarded; |
(8) | the Company would not suffer serious economic harm; |
(9) | the Board has additional time to gather relevant information or pursue appropriate strategies; or |
(10) | all or any of the above. |
(a) | they are liable individually as well as jointly for all payments, including calls, in respect of the share; |
(b) | subject to article 2.13(a), on the death of any one of them the survivor is the only person the Company will recognise as having any title to the share; |
(c) | any one of them may give effective receipts for any dividend, bonus, interest or other distribution or payment in respect of the share; and |
(d) | except where persons are jointly entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event, the Company may, but is not required to, register more than four (4) persons as joint holders of the share. |
(a) | recognise a person as holding a share on trust, even if the Company has notice of a trust; or |
(b) | recognise, or be bound by, any equitable, contingent, future or partial claim to or interest in a share by any other person, except an absolute right of ownership in the registered holder, even if the Company has notice of that claim or interest. |
(a) | Subject to article 2.15(e), upon being entered in the register of members as the holder of a share, a member is entitled: |
(1) | without payment, to one certificate for all the shares of each class held by that member (and, upon transferring a part of the member’s holding of shares of any class, to a certificate for the balance of that holding); and |
(2) | upon payment of such reasonable sum as the directors may determine for every certificate after the first, to several certificates each for one or more of that member’s shares. |
(b) | Every certificate shall specify the number, class and distinguishing numbers (if any) of the shares to which it relates and whether they are fully paid or partly paid up. A certificate may be executed under seal or executed in such other manner as the directors determine and the Companies Law permits. |
(c) | The Company shall not be bound to issue more than one certificate for shares held jointly by several persons and delivery of a certificate for a share to one joint holder shall be a sufficient delivery to all of them. |
(d) | If a share certificate is defaced, worn-out, lost or destroyed, it may be renewed on such terms (if any) as to: |
(1) | evidence; |
(2) | indemnity; |
(3) | payment of the expenses reasonably incurred by the Company in investigating the evidence; and |
(4) | payment of a reasonable fee, if any, for issuing a replacement share certificate, |
(e) | Subject to article 2.15(f), at any time the relevant shares are listed on the Designated Stock Exchange (provided that the Designated Stock Exchange remains an ’approved stock exchange’ (as defined in the Exemption Order)), the Company shall not be required to (although may, in its absolute discretion choose to), produce a share certificate in accordance with this article 2.15. |
(f) | Following a written request at any time from a member to the Company requesting a share certificate in respect of shares held by that member, the Company shall, within two (2) months of receipt by the Company of that written request, complete and have ready for delivery the certificate of such shares in respect of which the request was made, unless the conditions of allotment of the shares otherwise provide. |
Calls, forfeiture, indemnities, lien and surrender |
(a) | Subject to the terms on which any shares are issued, the Board may: |
(1) | make calls on the members for any amount unpaid on their shares which is not by the terms of issue of those shares made payable at fixed times; and |
(2) | on the issue of shares, differentiate between members as to the amount of calls to be paid and the time for payment. |
(b) | The Board may require a call to be paid by instalments. |
(c) | The Board must send members notice of a call at least fourteen (14) days before the amount called is due, specifying the amount of the call, the time for payment and the manner in which payment must be made. |
(d) | Each member must pay the amount called to the Company by the time and in the manner specified for payment. |
(e) | A call is taken to have been made when the resolution of the Board authorising the call is passed. |
(f) | The Board may revoke a call or extend the time for payment. |
(g) | A call is valid even if a member for any reason does not receive notice of the call. |
(h) | If an amount called on a share is not paid in full by the time specified for payment, the person who owes the amount must pay: |
(1) | interest on the unpaid part of the amount from the date payment is due to the date payment is made, at a rate determined under article 3.7; and |
(2) | any costs, expenses or damages the Company incurs due to the failure to pay or late payment. |
(i) | Any amount unpaid on a share that, by the terms of issue of the share, becomes payable on issue or at a fixed date: |
(1) | is treated for the purposes of these articles as if that amount were payable under a call duly made and notified; and |
(2) | must be paid on the date on which it is payable under the terms of issue of the share. |
(j) | The Board may, to the extent the law permits, waive or compromise all or part of any payment due to the Company under the terms of issue of a share or under this article 3.1. |
(a) | In a proceeding to recover a call, or an amount payable due to the failure to pay or late payment of a call, proof that: |
(1) | the name of the defendant is entered in the register as the holder or one of the holders of the share on which the call is claimed; |
(2) | the resolution making the call is recorded in the minute book; and |
(3) | notice of the call was given to the defendant complying with these articles, |
(b) | In article 3.2(a), defendant includes a person against whom the Company alleges a set-off or counterclaim, and a proceeding to recover a call or an amount is to be interpreted accordingly. |
(a) | The Board may accept from a member the whole or a part of the amount unpaid on a share even though no part of that amount has been called. |
(b) | The Board may authorise payment by the Company of interest on an amount accepted under article 3.3(a), until the amount becomes payable, at a rate agreed between the Board and the member paying the amount. |
(c) | The Board may repay to a member any amount accepted under article 3.3(a). |
(a) | If a member fails to pay the whole of a call or an instalment of a call by the time specified for payment, the Board may serve a notice on that member: |
(1) | requiring payment of the unpaid part of the call or instalment, together with any interest that has accrued and all costs, expenses or damages that the Company has incurred due to the failure to pay; |
(2) | specifying a further time (at least fourteen (14) days after the date of the notice) by which, and the manner in which, the amount payable under article 3.4(a)(1) must be paid; and |
(3) | stating that if the whole of the amount payable under article 3.4(a)(1) is not paid by the time and in the manner specified, the shares on which the call was made will be liable to be forfeited. |
(b) | If a member does not comply with a notice served under article 3.4(a), the Board may by resolution forfeit any share concerning which the notice was given at any time after the day named in the notice and before the payment required by the notice is made. |
(c) | A forfeiture under article 3.4(b) includes all dividends, interest and other amounts payable by the Company on the forfeited share and not actually paid before the forfeiture. |
(d) | Where a share has been forfeited: |
(1) | notice of the resolution must be given to the member in whose name the share stood immediately before the forfeiture; and |
(2) | an entry of the forfeiture, with the date, must be made in the register of members. |
(e) | Failure to give the notice or to make the entry required under article 3.4(d) does not invalidate the forfeiture. |
(f) | A forfeited share becomes the property of the Company and the Board may sell, reissue or otherwise dispose of the share as it thinks fit and, in the case of reissue or other disposal, with or without crediting as paid up any amount paid on the share by any former holder. |
(g) | A person whose shares have been forfeited ceases to be a member as to the forfeited shares, but must, unless the Board decides otherwise, pay to the Company: |
(1) | all calls, instalments, interest, costs, expenses and damages owing on the shares at the time of the forfeiture; and |
(2) | interest on the unpaid part of the amount payable under article 3.4(g)(1), from the date of the forfeiture to the date of payment, at a rate determined under article 3.7. |
(h) | The forfeiture of a share extinguishes all interest in, and all claims and demands against the Company relating to, the forfeited share and, subject to article 3.6(h), all other rights attached to the share. |
(i) | The Board may: |
(1) | exempt a share from all or part of this article 3.4; |
(2) | waive or compromise all or part of any payment due to the Company under this article 3.4; and |
(3) | before a forfeited share has been sold, reissued or otherwise disposed of, cancel the forfeiture on the conditions it decides. |
(a) | The Company has a first lien on: |
(1) | each partly paid share for all unpaid calls and instalments due on that share; and |
(2) | each share for any amounts the Company is required by law to pay and has paid in respect of that share. |
(b) | The Company’s lien on a share extends to all dividends, interest and other amounts payable on the share and to the proceeds of sale of the share. |
(c) | The Board may sell a share on which the Company has a lien as it thinks fit where: |
(1) | an amount for which a lien exists under this article 3.5 is presently payable; and |
(2) | the Company has given the registered holder a written notice, at least fourteen (14) days before the date of the sale, stating and demanding payment of that amount. |
(d) | The Board may do anything necessary or desirable to protect any lien, charge or other right to which the Company is entitled under these articles or a law. |
(e) | When the Company registers a transfer of shares on which the Company has a lien without giving the transferee notice of its claim, the Company’s lien is released so far as it relates to amounts owing by the transferor or any predecessor in title. |
(f) | The Board may: |
(1) | exempt a share from all or part of this article 3.5; and |
(2) | waive or compromise all or part of any payment due to the Company under this article 3.5. |
(a) | A reference in this article 3.6 to a sale of a share by the Company is a reference to any sale, reissue or other disposal of a share under article 3.4(f) or article 3.5(c). |
(b) | When the Company sells a share, the Company may: |
(1) | receive the purchase money or consideration given for the share; |
(2) | effect a transfer of the share or execute or appoint a person to execute, on behalf of the former holder, a transfer of the share; and |
(3) | register as the holder of the share the person to whom the share is sold. |
(c) | A person to whom the Company sells shares need not take any steps to investigate the regularity or validity of the sale, or to see how the purchase money or consideration on the sale is applied. That person’s title to the shares is not affected by any irregularity by the Company in relation to the sale. A sale of the share by the Company is valid even if a Transmission Event occurs to the member before the sale. |
(d) | The only remedy of a person who suffers a loss because of a sale of a share by the Company is a claim for damages against the Company, but the Company shall not be liable for a loss caused by the price at which the shares are sold in good faith. |
(e) | The proceeds of a sale of shares by the Company must be applied in paying: |
(1) | first, the expenses of the sale; |
(2) | secondly, all amounts payable (whether presently or not) by the former holder to the Company, |
(f) | Until the proceeds of a sale of a share sold by the Company are claimed or otherwise disposed of according to law, the Board may invest or use the proceeds in any other way for the benefit of the Company. |
(g) | The Company is not required to pay interest on money payable to a former holder under this article 3.6. |
(h) | On completion of a sale, reissue or other disposal of a share under article 3.4(f), the rights which attach to the share which were extinguished under article 3.4(h) revive. |
(i) | A written statement by a director or secretary of the Company that a share in the Company has been: |
(1) | duly forfeited under article 3.4(b); |
(2) | duly sold, reissued or otherwise disposed of under article 3.4(f); or |
(3) | duly sold under article 3.5(c), |
(a) | For the purposes of articles 3.1(h)(1) and 3.4(g)(2), the rate of interest payable to the Company is: |
(1) | if the Board has fixed a rate, that rate; or |
(2) | in any other case, a rate per annum 2% higher than the rate prescribed in respect of unpaid judgments in the Royal Court of Jersey. |
(b) | Interest accrues daily and may be capitalised monthly or at such other intervals the Board decides. |
(a) | Subject to each Statement of Rights and the provisions of the Companies Law, the Board may pay any dividends from time to time as the Board may determine, including any interim dividends. |
(b) | The Board may rescind a decision to pay a dividend, before the payment date in its sole discretion. |
(c) | The Board may pay any dividend required to be paid under the terms of issue of a share. |
(d) | The Board may pay half-yearly, quarterly or at other suitable intervals to be settled by them any dividend which may be payable at a fixed rate. |
(e) | Paying a dividend does not require confirmation or approval at a general meeting. |
(f) | Subject to any rights or restrictions attached to any shares or class of shares: |
(1) | all dividends must be paid equally on all shares, except that a partly paid share confers an entitlement |
(2) | for the purposes of article 4.1(f)(1), unless the Board decides otherwise, an amount paid on a share in advance of a call is to be taken as not having been paid until it becomes payable; and |
(3) | interest is not payable by the Company on any dividend or any amounts payable therewith. |
(g) | The Board may fix a record date for a dividend. |
(h) | A dividend in respect of a share must be paid, subject to the rules of any Designated Stock Exchange (including any rules relating to the settlement of transfers of securities), to the person who is registered, or entitled under articles 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 to be registered, as the holder of the share: |
(1) | where the Board has fixed a record date in respect of the dividend, on that date; or |
(2) | where the Board has not fixed a record date in respect of that dividend, on the date fixed for payment of the dividend, |
(i) | When resolving to pay a dividend, the Board may direct payment of the dividend from any available source permitted by law, including: |
(1) | wholly or partly by the distribution of specific assets, including paid-up shares or other securities of the Company or of another body corporate, either generally or to specific members; and |
(2) | to particular members wholly or partly out of any particular fund or reserve or out of profits derived from any particular source, and to the other members wholly or partly out of any other particular fund or reserve or out of profits derived from any other particular source. |
(j) | Where a person is entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event, the Board may, but need not, retain any dividends payable on that share until that person becomes registered as the holder of that share or transfers it. |
(k) | The Board may retain from any dividend payable to a member any amount presently payable by the member to the Company and apply the amount retained to the amount owing. |
(l) | The Board may decide the method of payment of any dividend or other amount in respect of a share. Different methods of payment may apply to different members or groups of members (such as overseas members). Without limiting any other method of payment which the Company may adopt, payment in respect of a share may be made: |
(1) | by such electronic or other means approved by the Board directly to an account (of a type approved by the Board) nominated in writing by the member or the joint holders; or |
(2) | by cheque sent to the address of the member shown in the register of members or, in the case of joint holders, to the address shown in the register of members of any of the joint holders, or to such other address as the member or any of the joint holders in writing direct. |
(m) | A cheque sent under article 4.1(l): |
(1) | may be made payable to bearer or to the order of the member to whom it is sent or any other person the member directs; and |
(2) | is sent at the member’s risk. |
(n) | If the Board decides that payments will be made by electronic transfer into an account (of a type approved by the Board) nominated by a member, but no such account is nominated by the member or an electronic transfer into a nominated account is rejected or refunded, the Company may credit the amount payable to an account of the Company to be held until the member nominates a valid account. |
(o) | Where a member does not have a registered address or the Company believes that a member is not known at the member’s registered address or cheques have been returned undelivered or other payment methods have failed on more than one occasion, the Company may credit an amount payable in respect of the member’s shares to an account of the Company to be held until the member claims the amount payable or nominates a valid account. |
(p) | An amount credited to an account under articles 4.1(n) or 4.1(o) is to be treated as having been paid to the member at the time it is credited to that account. The Company will not be a trustee of the money and no interest will accrue on the money. The money may be used for the benefit of the Company until claimed or otherwise disposed of according to applicable law. |
(q) | If a cheque for an amount payable under article 4.1(l) is not presented for payment for at least eleven (11) calendar months after issue or an amount is held in an account under articles 4.1(n) or 4.1(o) for at least eleven (11) calendar months, the Board may stop payment on the cheque and invest or otherwise make use of the amount for the benefit of the Company until claimed or otherwise disposed of according to applicable law. |
(r) | A dividend that remains unclaimed for a period of ten (10) years after it became due for payment shall be forfeited to, and shall cease to remain owing by, the Company. |
(s) | Provided the directors act reasonably and in accordance with the Companies Law, they shall not incur any personal liability to the holders of shares conferring a preference for any damage that they may suffer by reason of the payment of an interim dividend on any shares having deferred or non-preferred rights. |
(a) | Subject to: |
(1) | any rights or restrictions attached to any shares or class of shares; and |
(2) | any special resolution of the Company; |
(3) | forming part of the undivided profits of the Company; |
(4) | representing profits arising from an ascertained accretion to capital or a revaluation of the assets of the Company; |
(5) | arising from the realisation of any assets of the Company; or |
(6) | otherwise available for distribution as a dividend. |
(b) | The Board may resolve that all or any part of the capitalised amount is to be applied: |
(1) | in paying up in full, at an issue price decided by the Board, any unissued shares in or other securities of the Company; |
(2) | in paying up any amounts unpaid on shares or other securities held by the members; |
(3) | partly as specified in article 4.2(b)(1) and partly as specified in article 4.2(b)(2); or |
(4) | any other method permitted by law. |
(c) | Articles 4.1(f), 4.1(g), 4.1(h), and 4.1(s) apply, so far as they can and with any necessary changes, to capitalising an amount under this article 4.2 as if references in those articles to: |
(1) | a dividend were references to capitalising an amount; and |
(2) | a record date were references to the date the Board resolves to capitalise the amount under this article 4.2. |
(d) | Where the terms of options (existing at the date the resolution referred to in article 4.2(b) is passed) entitle the holder to an issue of bonus shares under this article 4.2, the Board may in determining the number of unissued shares to be so issued, allow in an appropriate manner for the future issue of bonus shares to options holders. |
(a) | To give effect to any resolution to reduce the capital of the Company, to satisfy a dividend as set out in article 4.1(i)(1) or to capitalise any amount under article 4.2, the Board may settle as it thinks expedient any difficulty that arises in making the distribution or capitalisation and, in particular: |
(1) | make cash payments in cases where members are entitled to fractions of shares or other securities; |
(2) | decide that amounts or fractions of less than a particular value decided by the Board may be disregarded to adjust the rights of all parties; |
(3) | fix the value for distribution of any specific assets; |
(4) | pay cash or issue shares or other securities to any member to adjust the rights of all parties; |
(5) | vest any of those specific assets, cash, shares or other securities in a trustee on trust for the persons entitled to the distribution or capitalised amount; and |
(6) | authorise any person to make, on behalf of all the members entitled to any specific assets, cash, shares or other securities as a result of the distribution or capitalisation, an agreement with the Company or another person which provides, as appropriate, for the distribution or issue to them of shares or other securities credited as fully paid up or for payment by the Company on their behalf of the amounts or any part of the amounts remaining unpaid on their existing shares or other securities by applying their respective proportions of the amount resolved to be distributed or capitalised. |
(b) | Any agreement made under an authority referred to in article 4.3(a)(6) is effective and binds all members concerned. |
(c) | If a distribution, transfer or issue of specific assets, shares or securities to a particular member or members is, in the Board’s discretion, considered impracticable or would give rise to parcels of securities that do not constitute a marketable parcel, the Board may make a cash payment to those members or allocate the assets, shares or securities to a trustee to be sold on behalf of, and for the benefit of, those members, instead of making the distribution, transfer or issue to those members. Any proceeds receivable by members under this article 4.3(c) will be net of expenses incurred by the Company and trustee in selling the relevant assets, shares or securities. |
(d) | If the Company distributes to members (either generally or to specific members) securities in the Company or in another body corporate or trust (whether as a dividend or otherwise and whether or not for value), each of those members appoints the Company as such member’s agent to do anything needed to give effect to that distribution, including agreeing to become a member of that other body corporate. |
(a) | The Board may set aside out of the Company’s profits any reserves or provisions it decides. |
(b) | The Board may appropriate to the Company’s profits any amount previously set aside as a reserve or provision. |
(c) | Setting aside an amount as a reserve or provision does not require the Board to keep the amount separate from the Company’s other assets or prevent the amount being used in the Company’s business or being invested as the Board decides. |
(a) | Subject to the following articles about the transfer of shares, a member may transfer any certificated shares or, Uncertificated shares in accordance with the CREST Order, to another person by completing an instrument of transfer, in a common form or in a form approved by the directors, executed: |
(1) | where the shares are fully paid, by or on behalf of that member; and |
(2) | where the shares are partly paid, by or on behalf of that member and the transferee. |
(b) | Subject to the provisions of the CREST Order the transferor of a share is deemed to remain the holder until the name of the transferee is entered in the register in respect of it. |
(a) | The Company shall register the transfer of any shares held in Uncertificated form by means of a relevant system in accordance with the Companies Law and the CREST Order and the rules of the relevant system. |
(b) | The Board may, in its absolute discretion, refuse to register any transfer of an Uncertificated share where permitted by these articles, the Companies Law and the CREST Order. |
(a) | An instrument of transfer of a certificated share may be in any usual form or in any other form which the Board may approve and shall be signed by or on behalf of the transferor and (except in the case of a fully paid share) by or on behalf of the transferee. |
(b) | The Board may, in its absolute discretion, refuse to register any instrument of transfer of a certificated share: |
(1) | which is not fully paid up but, in the case of a class of shares which has been admitted to trading on the Designated Stock Exchange, not so as to prevent dealings in those shares from taking place on an open and proper basis; |
(2) | on which the Company has a lien; or |
(3) | as otherwise required by applicable law. |
(c) | The Board may also refuse to register any instrument of transfer of a certificated share unless it is: |
(1) | left at the registered office of the Company, or at such other place as the Board may decide, for registration; |
(2) | accompanied by the certificate for the shares to be transferred and such other evidence (if any) as the Board may reasonably require to prove the title of the intending transferor or his right to transfer the shares; and |
(3) | in respect of only one class of shares. |
(a) | The Board may suspend registration of the transfer of shares at such times and for such periods (not exceeding 30 days in any calendar year) as it determines. |
(b) | The registration of transfers of shares or of transfers of any class of shares may be suspended at such times and for such periods (not exceeding 30 days in any year) as the Board may determine in its discretion. Unless otherwise permitted by the CREST Order, the Company may not close any register relating to a participating security without the consent of the approved operator of the relevant system. |
(a) | If the Board so decides, the Company may charge a reasonable fee for the registration of any instrument of transfer or other document relating to the title to a share. |
(a) | The Company shall be entitled to retain any instrument of transfer which is registered; but an instrument of transfer which the Board refuses to register shall be returned to the person lodging it when notice of the refusal is given. |
(a) | Subject to article 5.7(c), where a member dies, the only persons the Company will recognise as having any title to the member’s shares or any benefits accruing on those shares are: |
(1) | where the deceased was a sole holder, the legal personal representative of the deceased; and |
(2) | where the deceased was a joint holder, the survivor or survivors. |
(b) | Article 5.7(a) does not release the estate of a deceased member from any liability on a share, whether that share was held by the deceased solely or jointly with other persons. |
(c) | The Board may register a transfer of shares signed by a member before a Transmission Event even though the Company has notice of the Transmission Event. |
(d) | A person who becomes entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event may, on producing such evidence as the Board requires to prove that person’s entitlement to the share, choose: |
(1) | to be registered as the holder of the share by signing and giving the Company a written notice stating that choice; or |
(2) | to nominate some other person to be registered as the transferee of the share by executing or effecting in some other way a transfer of the share to that other person. |
(e) | The provisions of these articles concerning the right to transfer shares and the registration of transfers of shares apply, so far as they can and with any necessary changes, to a notice or transfer under article 5.7(d) as if the relevant Transmission Event had not occurred and the notice or transfer were executed or effected by the registered holder of the share. |
(f) | Where two (2) or more persons are jointly entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event they will, on being registered as the holders of the share, be taken to hold the share as joint tenants and article 2.13 will apply to them. |
(a) | The Company may give notice to any person whom the Company knows or has reasonable cause to believe: |
(1) | to hold an interest (as defined in article 6.2(i)(4)) in the Company’s shares (of a class of shares admitted to trading); or |
(2) | to have held an interest in the Company’s shares (of a class of shares admitted to trading) at any time during the three (3) years immediately preceding the date on which on which the notice is issued. |
(b) | The notice may require the person: |
(1) | to confirm that such person holds such an interest in the Company’s shares or (as the case may be) to state whether or not it is the case, and |
(2) | if such person holds, or has during that time held, any such interest, to give such further information as may be required in accordance with the following provisions of this article 6.1. |
(c) | The notice may require the person to whom it is addressed to give particulars of the person’s own present or past interest in the Company’s shares held by such person at any time during the three (3) year period mentioned above. |
(d) | The notice may require the person to whom it is addressed, where: |
(1) | such person’s interest is a present interest and another interest in the shares subsists, or |
(2) | another interest in the shares subsisted during the three (3) year period mentioned above at a time when such person’s interest subsisted, to give, to the best of such person’s knowledge, such particulars with respect to that other interest as are required by the notice. |
(e) | The particulars referred to in articles 6.1(c) and 6.1(d) include: |
(1) | the identity of any person who holds an interest in the shares in question; and |
(2) | the terms of any agreement or arrangement to which any person who holds an interest in such shares is or was party: |
(A) | relating to the exercise of any right conferred by the shares or the acquisition of any interest in the shares; or |
(B) | which constitutes a Derivative Security. |
(f) | The notice may require the person to whom it is addressed, where the person’s interest is a past interest, to give (to the best of such person’s knowledge) particulars of the identity of the person who held that interest immediately upon the person ceasing to hold it. |
(g) | The information required by the notice must be given within such reasonable time as may be specified in the notice. |
(a) | If a member, or any other person appearing to have an interest in shares held by that member, has been given a notice under article 6.1 and has failed in relation to any shares (the Default Shares) to give the Company the information thereby required within three (3) Business Days from the time reasonably specified in the notice, the following sanctions shall apply, unless the Board otherwise determines in relation to the Default Shares: |
(1) | the member shall not be entitled in respect of the Default Shares to be present or to vote (either in person or by representative or proxy) at any general meeting or at any separate meeting of the holders of any class of shares or on any poll, or to exercise any other right conferred by membership in respect of the Default Shares in relation to any such meeting or poll; |
(2) | any dividend (or other distribution) payable in respect of the Default Shares shall be withheld by the Company (without interest) and the member shall not be entitled to elect to receive shares instead of any such dividend (or other distribution); and |
(3) | no transfer, other than an excepted transfer, of any shares held by the member may be registered unless: |
(i) | the member is not in default as regards supplying the information required; and |
(ii) | the member proves to the satisfaction of the Board that no person in default as regards supplying such information has an interest in any of the shares the subject of the transfer. |
(b) | In support of article 6.2(a), the Board may, at any time while sanctions under article 6.2(a) apply in relation to any shares, effect a transfer of the shares (or any interest in them) in favour of such nominee as specified by the Board. |
(c) | Where any person appearing to have an interest in the Default Shares has been duly served with a notice or copy thereof and the Default Shares which are the subject of such notice are held by a person holding shares or rights or interests in shares in the Company on a nominee basis who has been determined by the Company to be an approved nominee (an Approved Nominee): |
(1) | the provisions of this article 6 shall be treated as applying only to such Default Shares held by the Approved Nominee and not (insofar as such person’s apparent interest is concerned) to any other shares held by the Approved Nominee; and |
(2) | where the member upon whom a default notice is served is an Approved Nominee acting in its capacity as such, the obligations of the Approved Nominee as a member of the Company are limited to disclosing to the Company such information as is known to it relating to any person appearing to have an interest in the shares held by it. |
(d) | Where the sanctions under article 6.2(a) apply in relation to any shares, they shall cease to have effect at the end of the period of seven (7) days (or such shorter period as the Board may determine) following the earlier of: |
(1) | receipt by the Company of the information required by the notice mentioned in that article; and |
(2) | receipt by the Company of notice that the shares have been transferred by means of an excepted transfer. |
(e) | The Board may in its absolute discretion suspend or cancel any of the sanctions at any time in relation to any Default Shares. |
(f) | Upon sanctions ceasing to have effect in relation to any shares, any dividend withheld in respect of the shares must be paid to the relevant member and, if the Board has effected a transfer under article 6.2(b), the shares must be transferred back to the previous holder. |
(g) | Any new shares in the Company issued in right of Default Shares shall be subject to the same sanctions as apply to the Default Shares, and the Board may make any right to an allotment of the new shares subject to sanctions corresponding to those which will apply to those shares on issue, provided that: |
(1) | any sanctions applying to, or to a right to, new shares by virtue of this article 6.2 shall cease to have effect when the sanctions applying to the related Default Shares cease to have effect (and shall be suspended or cancelled if and to the extent that the sanctions applying to the related Default Shares are suspended or cancelled); and |
(2) | article 6.2(a) shall apply to the exclusion of this article 6.2(g) if the Company gives a separate notice under article 6.1 in relation to the new shares. |
(h) | Where, on the basis of information obtained from a member in respect of any shares held by such member, the Company gives a notice under article 6.1 to any other person, it shall at the same time send a copy of the notice to the member. The accidental omission to do so, or the non-receipt by the member of the copy, shall, however, not invalidate or otherwise affect the application of article 6.2. |
(i) | For the purposes of articles 6.1 and 6.2: |
(1) | an excepted transfer means, in relation to any shares held by a member: |
(A) | a transfer pursuant to acceptance of a takeover offer (within the meaning of article 116 of the Companies Law) in respect of shares in the Company; |
(B) | a transfer in consequence of a sale made through any stock exchange on which the shares are normally traded; or |
(C) | a transfer which is shown to the satisfaction of the Board to be made in consequence of a sale of the whole of the beneficial interest in the shares to a person who is unconnected with the member and with any other person appearing to be interested in the shares; |
(3) | a person, other than the member holding a share, will be treated as appearing to have an interest in such share if the member has informed the Company that the person has, or might have, an interest in such share, or if the Company (after taking account of any information obtained from the member or, pursuant to a notice under article 6.1, from anyone else) knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the person has, or may have, an interest in such share; |
(4) | a person shall be treated as having an interest in the Company’s shares if, for the purposes of sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Exchange Act, the person would be deemed to constitute a beneficial owner of the share (which shall include holding a CDI); and |
(5) | reference to a person having failed to give the Company the information required by a notice, includes reference to: |
(A) | the person having failed or refused to give all or any part of it; |
(B) | the person having given any information which the person knows to be false in a material particular or having recklessly given information which is false in a material particular; and |
(C) | the Company knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that any of the information provided is false or materially incorrect. |
(e) | Nothing in article 6.2 limits the powers of the Company under article 6.1 or any other powers of the Company whatsoever. |
(a) | A general meeting may only be called: |
(1) | by a Board resolution; or |
(2) | as otherwise required by the Companies Law. |
(b) | The Board may, by public announcement, change the venue for, postpone or cancel a general meeting, but: |
(1) | a meeting that is called in accordance with a members’ requisition under the Companies Law; or |
(2) | any other meeting that is not called by a Board resolution, |
(c) | At an annual general meeting, only such nominations of persons for election to the Board shall be considered and such other business shall be conducted as shall have been properly brought before the meeting. To be properly brought before an annual general meeting, nominations and other business must be a proper matter for member action and must be: |
(1) | specified in the notice of general meeting given by or at the direction of the Board in accordance with article 7.2; |
(2) | brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board or a duly authorised committee thereof; or |
(3) | otherwise properly brought before the meeting by a member who: |
(A) | is a member of record of the Company (and, with respect to any beneficial owner, if different, on whose behalf such business is proposed or such nomination(s) are made, only if such beneficial owner is the beneficial owner of shares of the Company) both at the time the notice provided for in article 7.3 is delivered to the general counsel of the Company and on the record date for the determination of members entitled to vote at the general meeting, |
(B) | is entitled to vote at the meeting, and |
(C) | complies with the procedures and requirements set forth in article 7.3. |
(d) | Except as otherwise provided by the Companies Law, at an extraordinary general meeting, only such business may be conducted as is a proper matter for member action and as shall have been brought before the meeting pursuant to the notice of general meeting given by or at the direction of the Board in accordance with article 7.2. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the Board from submitting matters to the members at any extraordinary general meeting requested by members. |
(e) | Further, if the Board has determined that directors shall be elected at such extraordinary general meeting, then nominations of persons for election to the Board may be made: |
(1) | by or at the direction of the Board or by the general counsel; or |
(2) | by any member of the Company who satisfies each of the requirements set forth in subclauses (A), (B) and (C) of article 7.1(c)(3) above. |
(a) | Subject to the rules of any Designated Stock Exchange (including any rules relating to the settlement of transfers of securities), notice of a general meeting must be given to each person who at the time of giving the notice: |
(1) | is a member or auditor of the Company; or |
(2) | is entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event and has provided evidence of such entitlement that is satisfactory to the Board. |
(b) | The annual general meeting shall be designated as such and all other general meetings shall be designated extraordinary general meetings. |
(c) | The content of a notice of a general meeting called by the Board is to be decided by the Board, but it must state the general nature of the business to be transacted at the meeting and any other matters required by the Companies Law. |
(d) | Except with the approval of the Board or the chairperson, no person may move any amendment to a proposed resolution or to a document that relates to such a resolution. |
(e) | A person may waive notice of any general meeting by written notice to the Company. |
(f) | Failure to give a member or any other person notice of a general meeting or a proxy form does not invalidate anything done or any resolution passed at the general meeting if: |
(1) | the failure occurred by accident or inadvertent error; |
(2) | before or after the meeting, the person notifies the Company of the person’s agreement to that thing or resolution; or |
(3) | such failure is waived in accordance with article 7.2(g). |
(g) | A person’s attendance at a general meeting waives any objection that person may have to: |
(1) | a failure to give notice, or the giving of a defective notice, of the meeting unless the person at the beginning of the meeting objects to the holding of the meeting; and |
(2) | the consideration of a particular matter at the meeting which is not within the business referred to in the notice of the meeting, unless the person objects to considering the matter when it is presented. |
(a) | For nominations or other business to be properly brought before an annual general meeting by a member in accordance with article 7.1(c)(3), the member must have given timely notice thereof in writing and in proper form to the general counsel of the Company even if such matter is already the subject of any notice to the members or public announcement from the Board. |
(b) | To be timely in the case of an annual general meeting, a member’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Company or such other place designated by the Company for such purposes, not later than the close of business on the ninetieth (90th) day nor earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual general meeting (provided, however, that in the event that there was no annual general meeting in the prior year or the date of the annual general meeting is more than thirty (30) days before or more than ninety (90) days after such anniversary date, notice by the member must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to such annual general meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such annual general meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company). |
(c) | In the event the Company calls an extraordinary general meeting for the purpose of electing one or more directors to the Board, any member who is (i) a member of record of the Company (and, with respect to any beneficial owner, if different, on whose behalf such nomination(s) are made, only if such beneficial owner is the beneficial owner of shares of the Company) both at the time the notice provided for in article 7.3 is delivered to the general counsel of the Company and on the record date for the determination of members entitled to vote at the extraordinary general meeting and (ii) entitled to vote in such election of directors may nominate a person or persons (as the case may be) for election to such position(s) as specified in the Company’s notice of general meeting, if the member complies with the procedures and requirements set forth in this article 7.3. To be timely, such notice shall be delivered to the Company’s |
(d) | In no event shall any adjournment, deferral or postponement of a general meeting or the public announcement thereof commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a member’s notice as described in these articles. |
(e) | The number of nominees a member may nominate for election at a general meeting shall not exceed the number of directors to be elected at such general meeting, and for the avoidance of doubt, no member shall be entitled to make additional or substitute nominations following the expiration of the applicable time periods. |
(f) | A member’s notice providing for the nomination of persons for election to the Board or other business proposed to be brought before a general meeting shall set out, as to the member giving the notice the following information, in each case as of the date of such member’s notice: |
(1) | the name and address of such member, as they appear on the Company’s books, and of each of its Member Associated Persons; |
(2) | the class or series and number of shares of the Company which are, directly or indirectly, beneficially owned (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) (provided that a person shall in all events be deemed to beneficially own any shares of any class or series and number of shares of the Company as to which such person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time in the future) and owned of record by such member or any of its Member Associated Persons; |
(3) | the class or series, if any, and number of options, warrants, puts, calls, convertible securities, stock appreciation rights, or similar rights, obligations or commitments with an exercise or conversion privilege or a settlement payment or mechanism at a price related to any class or series of shares or other securities of the Company or with a value derived in whole or in part from the value of any class or series of shares or other securities of the Company, whether or not such instrument, right, obligation or commitment shall be subject to settlement in the underlying class or series of shares or other securities of the Company (each a “Derivative Security”), which are, directly or indirectly, beneficially owned by such member or any of its Member Associated Persons; |
(4) | any agreement, arrangement, understanding, or relationship, including any repurchase or similar so-called “stock borrowing” agreement or arrangement, engaged in, directly or indirectly, by such member or any of its Member Associated Persons, the purpose or effect of which is to mitigate loss to, reduce the economic risk (of ownership or otherwise) of any class or series of shares or other securities of the Company by, manage the risk of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of, such member or Member Associated Person with respect to any class or series of shares or other securities of the Company, or that provides, directly or indirectly, the opportunity to profit from any decrease in the price or value of any class or series or shares or other securities of the Company; |
(5) | a complete and accurate description of any performance-related fees (other than asset-based fees) to which such member or any Member Associated Person may be entitled as a result of any increase or decrease in the value of the Company’s securities or any Derivative Securities, including any such fees to which members of any Member Associated Person’s immediate family sharing the same household may be entitled; |
(6) | a description of any other direct or indirect opportunity to profit or share in any profit (including any performance-based fees) derived from any increase or decrease in the value of shares or other securities of the Company that such member or any of its Member Associated Persons has; |
(7) | any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship pursuant to which such member or any of its Member Associated Persons has a right to vote any shares or other securities of the Company; |
(8) | any direct or indirect interest of such member or any of its Member Associated Persons in any contract with the Company, any affiliate of the Company or any principal competitor of the Company (a list of which will be provided by the Company following a written request therefor by the member to the general counsel of the Company) (including, without limitation, any employment agreement, collective bargaining agreement or consulting agreement); |
(9) | any rights to dividends on the shares of the Company owned beneficially by such member or any of its Member Associated Persons that are separated or separable from the underlying shares of the Company; |
(10) | any proportionate interest in shares of the Company or Derivative Securities held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which such member or any of its Member Associated Persons is a general partner or, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner, if any; |
(11) | a description of all agreements, arrangements, and understandings between such member or any of its Member Associated Persons and any other person(s) (including their name(s)) in connection with or related to the ownership or voting of shares of the Company or Derivative Securities; |
(12) | all other information relating to such member or any of its Member Associated Persons that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for, as applicable, such business or the election of directors in a contested election pursuant to section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; |
(13) | all other information that, as of the date of the notice, would be required to be included in a filing with respect to the Company on Schedule 13D (including the exhibits thereto) under the Exchange Act (or any successor provision thereto) by such member or the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made; |
(14) | the identification of the names and addresses of other members (including beneficial owners) known by such member to support the nomination(s) or other business proposal(s) submitted by such member and, to the extent known, the class and number of all shares of the Company owned beneficially or of record by such other members(s) or other beneficial owner(s); |
(15) | a statement as to whether either such member or any of its Member Associated Persons intends to deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Company’s voting shares required under applicable law to elect such member’s nominees and/or approve such proposal (as applicable) and/or otherwise to solicit proxies from the members in support of such nomination or proposal (as applicable) and/or solicit the holders of shares in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees pursuant to Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act; |
(16) | a representation that the member is a holder of record or a beneficial owner of shares of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy, attorney or Representative at the meeting to propose such nomination and/or other business (as applicable); and |
(17) | such additional information that the Company may reasonably request regarding such member or any of its Member Associated Persons. |
(g) | A member’s notice providing for the nomination of persons for election to the Board shall, in addition to the information required by clause (f) above, set out, as to each person whom the member proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director: |
(1) | such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected; |
(2) | a description of all direct and indirect compensation and other agreements, arrangements and understandings, and any other material relationships, between or among such member or any of its Member Associated Persons, on the one hand, and each proposed nominee or its affiliates or associates, or others acting in concert therewith, on the other hand, including all information that |
(3) | a completed and signed questionnaire regarding the background and qualifications of such person to serve as a director, in a form to be provided by the Company after receiving a request by such member to the general counsel of the Company; |
(4) | all information with respect to such person that would be required to be set forth in a member’s notice pursuant to this article 7.3 if such person were a member or beneficial owner, on whose behalf the nomination was made, submitting a notice providing for the nomination of a person or persons for election as a director or directors of the Company in accordance with this article 7.3; |
(5) | such person’s written representation and agreement (in a form to be provided by the Company after receiving a request by such member to the general counsel of the Company): |
(A) | that such person is not and will not become party to any agreement, arrangement or understanding with, and has not given any commitment or assurance to, any person or entity as to how such person, if elected as a director of the Corporation, will act or vote on any issue or question (a “Voting Commitment”) that has not been disclosed to the Company or any Voting Commitment that could limit or interfere with such person’s ability to comply, if elected as a director of the Company, with such person’s fiduciary duties under applicable law, |
(B) | that such person is not and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement, or understanding with any person or entity other than the Company with respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement, or indemnification in connection with service or action as a director that has not been disclosed to the Company, |
(C) | that such person would, if elected as a director, comply with all of the Company’s corporate governance, ethics, conflict of interest, confidentiality and share ownership and trading policies and guidelines applicable generally to the Company’s directors (such policies and guidelines to be provided by the Company upon written request to the general counsel of the Company); |
(D) | that such person will provide facts, statements and other information in all communications with the Company and its members that are or will be true and correct and that do not and will not omit to state any fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; and |
(E) | that such person will tender his or her resignation as a director of the Company if the Board determines that such person failed to comply with the provisions of such representation and agreement in any material respect, provides such person notice of any such determination and, if such non-compliance may be cured, such person fails to cure such non-compliance within ten (10) Business Days after delivery of such notice to such person. |
(6) | all other information relating to such person or such person’s associates that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filing required to be made by such member or any Member Associated Person in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the election of directors in a contested election or otherwise required pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; and |
(7) | such additional information that the Company may reasonably request to determine the eligibility or qualifications of such person to serve as a director or an independent director of the Company, or that could be material to a reasonable member’s understanding of the qualifications and/or independence, or lack thereof, of such nominee as a director. |
(h) | A member’s notice regarding business proposed to be brought before a general meeting other than the nomination of persons for election to the Board shall, in addition to the information required by clause (f) above, set out: |
(1) | a brief description of: |
(A) | the business desired to be brought before such meeting, including the text of any resolution proposed for consideration by the members; |
(B) | the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting; and |
(C) | any material interest of such member or any of its Member Associated Persons in such business, including a description of all agreements, arrangements and understandings between such member or Member Associated Person and any other person(s) (including the name(s) of such other person(s)) in connection with or related to the proposal of such business by the member, |
(2) | if the matter such member proposes to bring before any general meeting involves an amendment to the Company’s memorandum or articles of association, the specific wording of such proposed amendment, and |
(3) | such additional information that the Company may reasonably request regarding the business that such member proposes to bring before the meeting. |
(i) | The foregoing notice requirements shall be deemed satisfied with respect to any proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 (or any successor thereof) promulgated under the Exchange Act if a member has notified the Company of its intention to present such proposal at an annual general meeting in compliance with such rule and such member’s proposal has been included in a proxy statement that has been prepared by the Company to solicit proxies for such annual general meeting. |
(j) | For purposes of this article 7.3, the term associate shall be as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. |
(k) | For purposes of this article 7.3, a Member Associated Person of any member submitting a proposal or nomination pursuant to this article 7 means: |
(1) | any beneficial owner of shares of the Company on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made by such member; |
(2) | any affiliate or associate of such member or such beneficial owner described in clause (1); |
(3) | any person or entity who is a member of a “group” (as such term is used in Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act (or any successor provision at law)) with, or any person acting in concert in respect of any matter involving the Company or its securities with, either such member or such beneficial owner described in clause (1); |
(4) | any member of the immediate family of such member or such beneficial owner described in clause (1); |
(5) | any participant (as defined in paragraphs (a)(ii)-(vi) of Instruction 3 to Item 4 of Schedule 14A) with such member, such beneficial owner described in clause (1) or any other Member Associated Person with respect to any proposed business or nominations, as applicable; and |
(6) | each person whom the member proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director. |
(l) | Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of these articles, a member shall also comply with all applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to the matters set forth in this article 7.3, including Rule 14a-19. |
(m) | Nothing in this article 7.3 shall be deemed to: |
(1) | affect any rights of members to request inclusion of proposals in the Company’s proxy statement pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act (including, without limitation, Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act); |
(2) | confer upon any member a right to have a nominee or any proposed business included in the Company’s proxy statement; or |
(3) | affect any rights of the holders of any class or series of preferred shares to elect directors pursuant to any applicable provisions of these articles. |
(n) | The Board may require any proposed nominee to submit to interviews with the Board or any committee thereof, and such proposed nominee shall make himself or herself available for any such interviews within ten (10) days following such request. |
(o) | The member providing notice pursuant to this section shall confirm or update the information contained in such member’s notice, if necessary, (x) not later than ten (10) days after the record date for the notice of the meeting so that such information is true and correct as of the record date for the notice of the meeting, and (y) not later than eight (8) Business Days before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof so that such information is true and correct as of the date that is ten (10) Business Days before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof (or if not practicable to provide such updated information not later than eight (8) Business Days before any adjournment or postponement, on the first practicable date before any such adjournment or postponement). For the avoidance of doubt, any information provided pursuant to this article 7.3(o) shall not be deemed to cure any deficiencies or inaccuracies in a notice previously delivered pursuant to this article 7.3 and shall not extend the time period for the delivery of notice pursuant to this article 7.3. If a member fails to provide such written update within such period, the information as to which such written update relates may be deemed not to have been provided in accordance with this article 7.3. |
(p) | If any information submitted pursuant to this article 7.3 by any member shall be inaccurate in any material respect (as determined by the Board or a committee thereof), such information shall be deemed not to have been provided in accordance with this article 7.3. Any member providing notice pursuant to this article 7.3 shall notify the general counsel of the Company in writing at the principal executive offices of the Company of any inaccuracy or change in any information submitted pursuant to this article 7.3 (including if any member or any Member Associated Person no longer intends to solicit proxies from the Company’s members) within two (2) Business Days after becoming aware of such inaccuracy or change, and any such notification shall clearly identify the inaccuracy or change, it being understood that no such notification may cure any deficiencies or inaccuracies with respect to any prior submission by such member. Upon written request of the general counsel of the Company on behalf of the Board (or a duly authorized committee thereof), any such member shall provide, within seven (7) Business Days after delivery of such request (or such other period as may be specified in such request), (A) written verification, reasonably satisfactory to the Board, any committee thereof or any authorized officer of the Company, to demonstrate the accuracy of any information submitted by such member pursuant to this article 7.3 and (B) a written affirmation of any information submitted by such member pursuant to this article 7.3 as of an earlier date. If a member fails to provide such written verification or affirmation within such period, the information as to which written verification or affirmation was requested may be deemed not to have been provided in accordance with this article 7.3. |
(q) | Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this article 7.3, if the member (or a qualified representative of the member) does not appear at the general meeting of the Company to present a nomination or proposed business, such nomination shall be disregarded and such proposed business must not be transacted, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the Company. |
(r) | For purposes of this article 7.3, to be considered a qualified representative of the member, a person must be a duly authorised officer, manager or partner of such member or must be authorised by a writing executed by such member or an electronic transmission delivered by such member to act for such member as proxy at the general meeting and such person must produce such writing or electronic transmission, or a reliable reproduction of the writing or electronic transmission, at the general meeting. |
(s) | Any member and each of its Member Associated Persons soliciting proxies from other members must use a proxy card color other than white, which color shall be reserved for the exclusive use of the Board. |
(t) | The chairperson of the Board shall have the power and duty to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought before a general meeting was made or proposed in accordance with the procedures set forth in article 7.3 (including whether the member or beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made (or is part of a group which solicited) did or did not so solicit, |
(u) | Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this article 7.3, unless otherwise required by law, if (x) any member or Member Associated Person provides notice pursuant to Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act with respect to any proposed nominee and (y) such member or Member Associated Person subsequently notifies the Company that it no longer intends to solicit proxies in support of the election or re-election of such proposed nominees in accordance with Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act or fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-19(a)(2) or Rule 14a-19(a)(3) under the Exchange Act (or fails to timely provide reasonable evidence sufficient to satisfy the Company that such member or Member Associated Person has met the requirements of Rule 14a-19(a)(3) under the Exchange Act in accordance with the following sentence) and (2) no other member or Member Associated Person has provided notice pursuant to Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act with respect to such proposed nominee and has complied with the requirements of Rule 14a-19(a)(2) or Rule 14a-19(a)(3) under the Exchange Act (or has failed to timely provide reasonable evidence sufficient to satisfy the Company that such member or Member Associated Person has met the requirements of Rule 14a-19(a)(3) under the Exchange Act in accordance with the following sentence), then the nomination of each such proposed nominee shall be disregarded, notwithstanding that proxies or votes in respect of the election of such proposed nominees may have been received by the Company (which proxies and votes shall be disregarded). Upon request by the Company, if any member provides notice pursuant to Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act, such member shall deliver to the Company, no later than five (5) Business Days prior to the applicable meeting, reasonable evidence that it has met the requirements of Rule 14a-19(a)(3) under the Exchange Act. |
(a) | For the purpose of determining whether a person is entitled as a member to receive notice of, attend or vote at a meeting and how many votes such person may cast, the Company may specify in the notice of the meeting a date (the Record Time), not more than sixty (60) days nor less than ten (10) days before the date fixed for the meeting, as the date for the determination of the members entitled to receive notice of, attend or vote at the meeting or to appoint a proxy to do so. |
(b) | Changes to the entries in the register of members of the Company after the Record Time shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to receive notice of, attend or vote at such meeting. |
(c) | The Record Time applies to any adjournment or postponement of the meeting, unless the Company determines a new record time for the adjourned or postponed meeting. |
(a) | The chairperson of a general meeting may take any action he or she considers appropriate for the safety of persons attending the meeting and the orderly conduct of the meeting and may refuse admission to, or require to leave and remain out of, the meeting any person: |
(1) | in possession of a pictorial-recording or sound-recording device; |
(2) | in possession of a placard or banner; |
(3) | in possession of an article considered by the chairperson to be dangerous, offensive or liable to cause disruption; |
(4) | who refuses to produce or permit examination of any article, or the contents of any article, in the person’s possession; |
(5) | who refuses to comply with a request to turn off a mobile telephone, personal communication device or similar device; |
(6) | who behaves or threatens to behave or who the chairperson has reasonable grounds to believe may behave in a dangerous, offensive or disruptive way; or |
(7) | who is not entitled to receive notice of the meeting. |
(b) | A person, whether a member or not, requested by the Board or the chairperson to attend a general meeting is entitled to be present and, at the request of the chairperson, to speak at the meeting. |
(c) | If the chairperson of a general meeting considers that there is not enough room for the members who wish to attend the meeting, he or she may arrange for any person whom he or she considers cannot be seated in the main meeting room to observe or attend the general meeting in a separate room. Even if the members present in the separate room are not able to participate in the conduct of the meeting, the meeting will nevertheless be treated as validly held in the main room. |
(d) | A separate meeting place may be linked to the main place of a general meeting by an instantaneous audio-visual communication device which, by itself or in conjunction with other arrangements: |
(1) | gives the member or general body of members in the separate meeting place a reasonable opportunity to participate in proceedings in the main place; |
(2) | enables the chairperson to be aware of proceedings in the other place; and |
(3) | enables the member or members in the separate meeting place to vote on a poll, |
(e) | If, before or during the meeting, any technical difficulty occurs where one or more of the matters set out in article 7.5(d) is not satisfied, the chairperson may: |
(1) | adjourn the meeting until the difficulty is remedied; or |
(2) | continue to hold the meeting in the main place (and any other place which is linked under article 7.5(d)) and transact business, and no member may object to the meeting being held or continuing. |
(f) | Nothing in this article 7.5 or in article 7.8 is to be taken to limit the powers conferred on the chairperson by law. |
(a) | No business may be transacted at a general meeting, except the election of a chairperson and the adjournment of the meeting, unless a quorum of members is present when the meeting proceeds to business. |
(b) | A quorum is persons holding or representing by proxy, attorney or Representative at least a majority of the voting power of the shares entitled to vote at such meeting. |
(c) | If a quorum is not present within thirty (30) minutes after the time appointed for the general meeting: |
(1) | where the meeting was called at the request of members, the meeting must be dissolved; or |
(2) | in any other case, the meeting stands adjourned to the day, time and place the directors present decide or, if they do not make a decision, to the same day in the next week at the same time and place and if a quorum is not present at the adjourned meeting within thirty (30) minutes after the time appointed for the meeting, the meeting must be dissolved. |
(a) | The chairperson of the Board or, in the absence of the chairperson, the deputy chairperson of the Board, the chief executive officer of the Company or any such other person as the chairperson, deputy chairperson or chief executive officer may appoint, is entitled, if present within fifteen (15) minutes after the time appointed for a general meeting and willing to act, to preside as chairperson at the meeting. |
(b) | The directors present may choose any officer or director of the Company to preside as chairperson if, at a general meeting, the chairperson, deputy chairperson or chief executive officer is not present within fifteen (15) minutes after the time appointed for the meeting and another person has not otherwise been appointed pursuant to article 7.7(a). |
(c) | If the directors do not choose a chairperson under article 7.7(b), the members present must elect as chairperson of the meeting: |
(1) | another director who is present and willing to act; or |
(2) | if no other director is present and willing to act, a member or officer of the Company who is present and willing to act. |
(d) | A chairperson of a general meeting may, for any item of business or discrete part of the meeting, vacate the chair in favour of another person nominated by him or her (Acting Chairperson). Where an instrument of proxy appoints the chairperson as proxy for part of the proceedings for which an Acting Chairperson has been nominated, the instrument of proxy is taken to be in favour of the Acting Chairperson for the relevant part of the proceedings. |
(e) | Wherever the term ‘chairperson’ is used in this article 7, it is to be read as a reference to the chairperson of the general meeting, unless the context indicates otherwise. |
(a) | Subject to the provisions of the Companies Law, the chairperson is responsible for the general conduct of the meeting and for the procedures to be adopted at the meeting. |
(b) | The chairperson may, at any time the chairperson considers it necessary or desirable for the efficient and orderly conduct of the meeting: |
(1) | impose a limit on the time that a person may speak on each motion or other item of business and terminate debate or discussion on any business, question, motion or resolution being considered by the meeting and require the business, question, motion or resolution to be put to a vote of the members present; |
(2) | adopt any procedures for casting or recording votes at the meeting whether on a show of hands or on a poll, including the appointment of scrutineers; and |
(3) | decide not to put to the meeting any resolution proposed in the notice convening the meeting (other than a resolution proposed by members in accordance with the Companies Law or required by the Companies Law to be put to the meeting). |
(c) | A decision by a chairperson under articles 7.8(a) or 7.8(b) is final. |
(d) | Subject to article 7.1(b), whether or not a quorum is present, the chairperson may postpone the meeting before it has started if, at the time and place appointed for the meeting, he or she considers that: |
(1) | there is not enough room for the number of members who wish to attend the meeting; or |
(2) | a postponement is necessary in light of the behaviour of persons present or for any other reason so that the business of the meeting can be properly carried out. |
(e) | A postponement under article 7.8(d) will be to another time, which may be on the same day as the meeting, and may be to another place (and the new time and place will be taken to be the time and place for the meeting as if specified in the notice that called the meeting originally). |
(f) | Subject to article 7.1(b), the chairperson may at any time during the course of the meeting: |
(1) | adjourn the meeting or any business, motion, question or resolution being considered or remaining to be considered by the meeting either to a later time at the same meeting or to an adjourned meeting; and |
(2) | for the purpose of allowing any poll to be taken or determined, suspend the proceedings of the meeting for such period or periods as he or she decides without effecting an adjournment. No business may be transacted and no discussion may take place during any suspension of proceedings unless the chairperson otherwise allows. |
(g) | The chairperson’s rights under articles 7.8(d) and 7.8(f) are exclusive and, unless the chairperson requires otherwise, no vote may be taken or demanded by the members present concerning any postponement, adjournment or suspension of proceedings. |
(h) | Only unfinished business may be transacted at a meeting resumed after an adjournment. |
(i) | Where a meeting is postponed or adjourned under this article 7.8, notice of the postponed or adjourned meeting must be given by public announcement, but need not be given to any other person. |
(j) | Where a meeting is postponed or adjourned, the Board may, by public announcement, postpone, cancel or change the place of the postponed or adjourned meeting. |
(a) | Except where a special resolution or another percentage is required, questions arising at a general meeting must be decided by a majority of votes cast by the members present at the meeting. A decision made in this way is for all purposes, a decision of the members. |
(b) | If the votes are equal on a proposed resolution, the chairperson of the meeting has a casting vote, in addition to any deliberative vote. |
(c) | Each matter submitted to a general meeting is to be decided on a poll. |
(d) | A poll at a general meeting must be taken in the way and at the time the chairperson directs. The result of the poll as declared by the chairperson is the resolution of the meeting at which the poll was demanded. |
(a) | Subject to these articles and the Companies Law and to any rights or restrictions attached to any shares or class of shares, at a general meeting, every member present has one vote for each share held as at the Record Time by the member entitling the member to vote, except for partly paid shares, each of which confers only the fraction of one vote which the amount paid (not credited) on the share bears to the total amounts paid and payable (excluding amounts credited) on the share. An amount paid in advance of a call is disregarded for this purpose. |
(b) | A joint holder may vote at a meeting either personally or by proxy, attorney or Representative as if that person was the sole holder. If more than one joint holder tenders a vote in respect of the relevant shares, the vote of the holder named first in the register who tenders a vote, whether in person or by proxy, attorney or Representative, must be accepted to the exclusion of the votes of the other joint holders. |
(c) | The parent or guardian of an infant member may vote at any general meeting on such evidence being produced of the relationship or of the appointment of the guardian as the Board may require and any vote so tendered by a parent or guardian of an infant member must be accepted to the exclusion of the vote of the infant member. |
(d) | A person entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event may vote at a general meeting in respect of that share in the same way as if that person were the registered holder of the share if, at least forty-eight (48) hours before the meeting (or such shorter time as the Board determines), the Board: |
(1) | admitted that person’s right to vote at that meeting in respect of the share; or |
(2) | was satisfied of that person’s right to be registered as the holder of, or to transfer, the share. |
(e) | Where a member holds a share on which a call or other amount payable to the Company has not been duly paid: |
(1) | that member is only entitled to be present at a general meeting and vote if that member holds, as at the Record Time, other shares on which no money is then due and payable; and |
(2) | on a poll, that member is not entitled to vote in respect of that share but may vote in respect of any shares that member holds, as at the Record Time, on which no money is then due and payable. |
(f) | A member is not entitled to vote any particular shares on a resolution if, under the Companies Law or the Listing Rules: |
(1) | the member must not vote or must abstain from voting those particular shares on the resolution; or |
(2) | a vote of those particular shares on the resolution by the member must be disregarded for any purposes. |
(g) | An objection to the validity of a vote tendered at a general meeting must be: |
(1) | raised before or immediately after the result of the vote is declared; and |
(2) | referred to the chairperson, whose decision is final. |
(h) | A vote tendered, but not disallowed by the chairperson under article 7.10(g), is valid for all purposes, even if it would not otherwise have been valid. |
(i) | The chairperson may decide any difficulty or dispute which arises as to the number of votes that may be cast by or on behalf of any member and the decision of the chairperson is final. |
(a) | Subject to these articles, each member entitled to vote at a general meeting may vote: |
(1) | in person or, where a member is a body corporate, by its Representative; |
(2) | by proxy; or |
(3) | by attorney. |
(b) | A proxy, attorney or Representative may, but need not, be a member of the Company. |
(c) | An instrument appointing a proxy is valid if it is in accordance with the Companies Law or in any form approved by the Board. |
(d) | A vote given in accordance with an instrument appointing a proxy or attorney is valid despite the transfer of the share in respect of which the instrument was given if the transfer is not registered by the time at which the instrument appointing the proxy or attorney is required to be received under article 7.11(h). |
(e) | Unless otherwise provided in the appointment of a proxy, attorney or Representative, an appointment will be taken to confer authority: |
(1) | even though the appointment may refer to specific resolutions and may direct the proxy, attorney or Representative how to vote on those resolutions, to do any of the acts specified in article 7.11(f); and |
(2) | even though the appointment may refer to a specific meeting to be held at a specified time or venue, where the meeting is rescheduled, adjourned or postponed to another time or changed to another venue, to attend and vote at the rescheduled, adjourned or postponed meeting or at the new venue. |
(f) | The acts referred to in article 7.11(e)(1) are: |
(1) | to vote on any amendment moved to the proposed resolutions and on any motion that the proposed resolutions not be put or any similar motion; |
(2) | to vote on any motion before the general meeting, whether or not the motion is referred to in the appointment; and |
(3) | to act generally at the meeting (including to speak, demand a poll, join in demanding a poll and to move motions). |
(g) | A proxy form issued by the Company must allow for the insertion of the name of the person to be primarily appointed as proxy and may provide that, in circumstances and on conditions specified in the form that are not inconsistent with these articles, the chairperson of the relevant meeting (or another person specified in the form) is appointed as proxy. |
(h) | A proxy or attorney may not vote at a general meeting or adjourned or postponed meeting or on a poll unless the instrument appointing the proxy or attorney, and the authority under which the instrument is signed or a certified copy of the authority, are received by the Company: |
(1) | at least forty-eight (48) hours, or such lesser time as specified by the Board in the notice of meeting, (or in the case of an adjournment or postponement of a meeting, any lesser time that the Board or the chairperson of the meeting decides) before the time for holding the meeting or adjourned or postponed meeting or taking the poll, as applicable; or |
(2) | where article 7.11(i)(2) applies, such shorter period before the time for holding the meeting or adjourned or postponed meeting or taking the poll, as applicable, as the Company determines in its discretion. |
(i) | Where the Company receives an instrument appointing a proxy or attorney in accordance with this article 7.11 and within the time period specified in article 7.11(h)(1), the Company is entitled to: |
(1) | clarify with the appointing member any instruction in relation to that instrument by written or verbal communication and make any amendments to the instrument required to reflect any clarification; and |
(2) | where the Company considers that the instrument has not been duly executed, return the instrument to the appointing member and request that the member duly execute the instrument and return it to the Company within the period determined by the Company under article 7.11(h)(2) and notified to the member. |
(j) | The member is taken to have appointed the Company as its attorney for the purpose of any amendments made to an instrument appointing a proxy in accordance with article 7.11(i)(1). An instrument appointing a proxy or attorney which is received by the Company in accordance with article 7.11(i)(2) is taken to have been validly received by the Company. |
(k) | The appointment of a proxy or attorney is not revoked by the appointor attending and taking part in the general meeting, but if the appointor votes on a resolution, the proxy or attorney is not entitled to vote, and must not vote, as the appointor’s proxy or attorney on the resolution. |
(l) | Unless written notice of the matter has been received at the Company’s registered office (or at another place specified for lodging an appointment of a proxy, attorney or Representative for the meeting) within the time period specified under articles 7.11(i) or 7.11(h) (as applicable), a vote cast by a proxy, attorney or Representative is valid even if, before the vote is cast: |
(1) | a Transmission Event occurs to the member; or |
(2) | the member revokes the appointment of the proxy, attorney or Representative or revokes the authority under which a third party appointed the proxy, attorney or Representative. |
(m) | The chairperson may require a person acting as a proxy, attorney or Representative to establish to the chairperson’s satisfaction that the person is the person duly appointed to act. If the person fails to satisfy the requirement, the chairperson may: |
(1) | exclude the person from attending or voting at the meeting; or |
(2) | permit the person to exercise the powers of a proxy, attorney or Representative on the condition that, if required by the Company, such person produce evidence of the appointment within the time set by the chairperson. |
(n) | The chairperson may delegate his or her powers under article 7.11(m) to any person. |
(a) | Subject to the Companies Law, for the purpose of facilitating the giving of voting instructions for any general meeting by any person who holds, or holds interests in, beneficial interests in shares that are held and traded in the DTC System: |
(1) | each DTC Proxy may appoint (whether by way of instrument of proxy, power of attorney, mandate or otherwise) more than one person as its proxy in respect of the same general meeting or resolution provided that the instrument of appointment shall specify the number of shares in respect of which the proxy is appointed and only one proxy may attend the general meeting and vote in respect of any one share; |
(2) | each DTC Proxy may appoint (by power of attorney, mandate or otherwise) an agent (including, without limitation, a proxy solicitation agent or similar person) for the purposes of obtaining voting instructions and submitting them to the Company on behalf of that DTC Proxy, whether in hard copy form or electronic form; |
(3) | each instrument of appointment made by a DTC Proxy or its agent shall, unless the Company is notified to the contrary in writing at least three hours before the start of the meeting (or adjourned meeting), be deemed to confer on the relevant proxy or agent the power and authority to appoint one or more sub proxies or sub agents or otherwise sub delegate any or all of its powers to any person; |
(4) | the Board may accept any instrument of appointment made by a DTC Proxy or its agent as sufficient evidence of the authority of that DTC Proxy or agent or require evidence of the authority under which any such appointment has been made; and |
(5) | the Board may, to give effect to the intent of this article 7.12: |
(A) | make such arrangements, either generally or in any particular case, as it thinks fit (including, without limitation, making or facilitating arrangements for the submission to the Company of voting instructions on behalf of DTC Proxies, whether in hard copy form or electronic form); |
(B) | make such regulations, either generally or in any particular case, as it thinks fit, whether in addition to, or in substitution for, any other provision of these articles; and |
(C) | do such other acts and things as it considers necessary or desirable (including, without limitation, approving the form of any instrument of appointment of proxy or agent, whether in hard copy form or electronic form). |
(b) | If any question arises at or in relation to a general meeting as to whether any person has been validly appointed as a proxy or agent by a DTC Proxy or its agent to vote (or exercise any other right) in respect of any shares: |
(1) | if the question arises at a general meeting, the question will be determined by the chairperson of the meeting in his or her sole discretion; or |
(2) | if the question arises otherwise than at a general meeting, the question will be determined by the Board in its sole discretion. |
(a) | The maximum number of directors is to be determined by the Board, but may not be more than fifteen (15). The Board may not determine a maximum which is less than the number of directors in office at the time the determination takes effect. |
(b) | The Board may appoint any eligible person to be a director, either as an addition to the existing directors or to fill a casual vacancy, but so that the total number of directors does not exceed the maximum number fixed under these articles. |
(c) | The Board or a committee of the Board shall not nominate for election or re-election as director any candidate who has not agreed to tender, promptly following the meeting at which he or she is elected as director, an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon (i) the failure to receive the required number of votes for re-election at the next annual meeting of members at which he or she faces re-election, and (ii) acceptance of such resignation by the Board. |
(d) | Each director shall be elected by the vote of the majority of the votes cast with respect to the director at any meeting of the members called for the purpose of the election of directors at which a quorum is present, provided that if as of a date that is fourteen (14) days in advance of the date the Company files its definitive proxy statement (regardless of whether or not thereafter revised or supplemented) with the Securities and Exchange Commission the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, the directors shall be elected by the vote of a plurality of the shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote in the election of directors generally. For purposes of this article 8.1(d), a majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes “withheld” with respect to that director. |
(e) | If an incumbent director nominee fails to receive the required number of votes for re-election, within ninety (90) days after certification of the election results, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board will recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken and the Board will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation. |
(f) | A director appointed by the Board under article 8.1(b) holds office until the conclusion of the next annual general meeting following his or her appointment. |
(g) | Subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding class or series of preferred shares, each director shall be elected at each annual general meeting and shall hold office until the next succeeding annual general meeting and until his or her successor shall be elected and shall qualify, but subject to prior death, resignation, disqualification or removal from office. |
(h) | Where the number of persons validly proposed for election or re-election as a director is greater than the number of directors to be elected, the persons receiving the most votes (up to the number of directors to be elected) shall be elected as directors and an absolute majority of votes cast shall not be a pre-requisite to the election of such directors. |
(i) | The retirement of a director from office under these articles and the re-election of a director or the election of another person to that office (as the case may be) takes effect at the conclusion of the meeting at which the retirement and re-election or election occur. |
(j) | Subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding class or series of preferred shares, any vacancy on the Board, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors, shall only be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board then in office, even though fewer than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. |
(a) | becomes prohibited or disqualified by applicable law from acting as a director of the Company; |
(b) | resigns by written notice to the Company; or |
(c) | is removed from office under article 8.3. |
(a) | the director’s conviction (with a plea of nolo contendere deemed to be a conviction) of a serious felony involving moral turpitude or a violation of U.S. federal or state securities law, but excluding a conviction based entirely on vicarious liability; or |
(b) | the director’s commission of any material act of dishonesty (such as embezzlement) resulting or intended to result in material personal gain or enrichment of the director at the expense of the Company or any subsidiary and which act, if made the subject to criminal charges, would be reasonably likely to be charged as a felony, |
(a) | Each director may be paid such remuneration out of the funds of the Company as the Board determines for his or her services as a director, including fees and reimbursement of expenses. |
(b) | Remuneration under article 8.4(a) may be provided in such manner that the Board decides, including by way of non-cash benefit, such as a contribution to a superannuation fund. |
(c) | Any director who performs extra services, makes any special exertions for the benefit of the Company or who otherwise performs services which, in the opinion of the Board, are outside the scope of the ordinary duties of a non- executive director, may be remunerated for the services (as determined by the Board) out of the funds of the Company. |
(a) | Unless the Board determines otherwise from time to time in its discretion, a director is not required to hold any shares in the Company to qualify for appointment. |
(b) | A director is entitled to attend and speak at general meetings and at meetings of the holders of a class of shares, even if he or she is not a member or a holder of shares in the relevant class. |
(a) | The Board may make regulations requiring the disclosure of interests that a director, and any person deemed by the Board to be related to or associated with the director, may have in any matter concerning the Company or a related body corporate. Any regulations made under these articles bind all directors. |
(b) | No act, transaction, agreement, instrument, resolution or other thing is invalid or voidable only because a person fails to comply with any regulation made under article 8.6(a). |
(c) | A director is not disqualified from contracting or entering into an arrangement with the Company as vendor, purchaser or in another capacity, merely because the director holds office as a director or because of the fiduciary obligations arising from that office. |
(d) | A contract or arrangement entered into by or on behalf of the Company in which a director is in any way interested is not invalid or voidable merely because the director holds office as a director or because of the fiduciary obligations arising from that office. |
(e) | A director who is interested in any arrangement involving the Company is not liable to account to the Company for any profit realised under the arrangement merely because the director holds office as a director or because of the fiduciary obligations arising from that office. |
(f) | A director may hold any other office or position (except auditor) in the Company or any related body corporate in conjunction with his or her directorship and may be appointed to that office or position on terms (including remuneration and tenure) the Board decides. |
(g) | A director may be or become a director or other officer of, or interested in, any related body corporate or any other body corporate promoted by or associated with the Company, or in which the Company may be interested as a vendor, and need not account to the Company for any remuneration or other benefits the director receives as a director or officer of, or from having an interest in, that body corporate. |
(h) | A director who has an interest in a matter that is being considered at a meeting of the Board may, despite that interest, be present and be counted in a quorum at the meeting, unless that is prohibited by the Companies Law, but may not vote on the matter if such interest is one which to a material extent conflicts or may conflict with the interests of the Company and of which the director is aware, and in respect of any such matter the decision of the chairperson of the meeting shall be final. No act, transaction, agreement, instrument, resolution or other thing is invalid or voidable only because a director fails to comply with this prohibition. |
(i) | The Board may exercise the voting rights given by shares in any corporation held or owned by the Company in any way the Board decides. This includes voting for any resolution appointing a director as a director or other officer of that corporation or voting for the payment of remuneration to the directors or other officers of that corporation. |
(j) | A director who is interested in any contract or arrangement may, despite that interest, participate in the execution of any document by or on behalf of the Company evidencing or otherwise connected with that contract or arrangement. |
(a) | The business and affairs of the Company are to be managed by or under the direction of the Board, which (in addition to the powers and authorities conferred on it by these articles) may exercise all powers and do all things that are: |
(1) | within the power of the Company; and |
(2) | are not by these articles or by law directed or required to be done by the Company in a general meeting. |
(b) | The Board may exercise all the powers of the Company: |
(1) | to borrow or raise money in any other way; |
(2) | to charge any of the Company’s property or business or any of its uncalled capital; and |
(3) | to issue debentures or give any security for a debt, liability or obligation of the Company or of any other person. |
(c) | Debentures or other securities may be issued on the terms and at prices decided by the Board, including bearing interest or not, with rights to subscribe for, or exchange into, shares or other securities in the Company or a related body corporate or with special privileges as to redemption, participating in share issues, attending and voting at general meetings and appointing directors. |
(d) | The Board may decide how cheques, promissory notes, banker’s drafts, bills of exchange or other negotiable instruments must be signed, drawn, accepted, endorsed or otherwise executed, as applicable, by or on behalf of the Company. |
(e) | The Board may: |
(1) | appoint or employ any person as an officer, agent or attorney of the Company for the purposes, with the powers, discretions and duties (including those vested in or exercisable by the Board), for any period and on any other conditions they decide; |
(2) | authorise an officer, agent or attorney to delegate any of the powers, discretions and duties vested in the officer, agent or attorney; and |
(3) | remove or dismiss any officer, agent or attorney of the Company at any time, with or without cause. |
(f) | A power of attorney may contain any provisions for the protection and convenience of the attorney or persons dealing with the attorney that the Board decides. |
(g) | Nothing in this article 8.7 limits the general nature of article 8.7(a). |
(a) | The Board may delegate any of its powers to one director, a committee of the Board, or any person or persons. |
(b) | A director, committee of the Board, or person to whom any powers have been so delegated must exercise the powers delegated in accordance with any directions of the Board. |
(c) | The acceptance of a delegation of powers by a director may, if the Board so resolves, be treated as an extra service or special exertion performed by the delegate for the purposes of article 8.4(e). |
(d) | The provisions of these articles applying to meetings and resolutions of the Board apply, so far as they can and with any necessary changes, to meetings and resolutions of a committee of the Board, except to the extent they are contrary to any direction given under article 8.8(b). |
(a) | The directors may meet together to attend to business and adjourn and otherwise regulate their meetings as they decide. |
(b) | The contemporaneous linking together by telephone or other electronic means of a sufficient number of directors to constitute a quorum, constitutes a meeting of the Board. All the provisions in these articles relating to meetings of the Board apply, as far as they can and with any necessary changes, to meetings of the Board by telephone or other electronic means. |
(c) | A meeting by telephone or other electronic means is to be taken to be held at the place where the chairperson of the meeting is or at such other place the chairperson of the meeting decides, as long as at least one of the directors involved was at that place for the duration of the meeting. |
(d) | A director taking part in a meeting by telephone or other electronic means is to be taken to be present in person at the meeting and all directors participating in the meeting will (unless there is a specific statement otherwise) be taken to have consented to the holding of the meeting by the relevant electronic means. |
(e) | If, before or during the meeting, any technical difficulty occurs where one or more directors cease to participate, the chairperson may adjourn the meeting until the difficulty is remedied or may, where a quorum of directors remains present, continue with the meeting. |
(a) | The chairperson of the Board, the chief executive officer of the Company or a majority of the Board may call a meeting of the Board. |
(b) | A secretary must, if requested by the chairperson of the Board, the chief executive officer of the Company or a majority of the Board, call a meeting of the Board. |
(a) | Notice of a meeting of the Board must be given to each person who is, at the time the notice is given, a director, except a director on leave of absence approved by the Board. |
(b) | A notice of a meeting of the Board: |
(1) | must specify the time and place of the meeting; |
(2) | need not state the nature of the business to be transacted at the meeting; |
(3) | may, if necessary, be given immediately before the meeting; and |
(4) | may be given in person or by post or by telephone, fax or other electronic means, or in any other way consented to by the directors from time to time. |
(c) | A director may waive notice of a meeting of the Board by giving notice to that effect in person or by post or by telephone, fax or other electronic means. |
(d) | Failure to give a director notice of a meeting of the Board does not invalidate anything done or any resolution passed at the meeting if: |
(1) | the failure occurred by accident or inadvertent error; or |
(2) | the director attended the meeting or waived notice of the meeting (whether before or after the meeting). |
(e) | A person who attends a meeting of the Board waives any objection that person may have to a failure to give notice of the meeting. |
(a) | No business may be transacted at a meeting of the Board unless a quorum of directors is present at the time the business is dealt with. |
(b) | Unless the Board decides differently, a majority of the total number of directors in office constitutes a quorum. |
(c) | If there is a vacancy in the office of a director, the remaining directors may act. But, if their number is not sufficient to constitute a quorum, they may act only in an emergency or to increase the number of directors to a number sufficient to constitute a quorum or to call a general meeting of the Company. |
(a) | The Board must elect a director to the office of chairperson of the Board and may elect one or more directors to the office of deputy chairperson of the Board. The Board may decide the period for which those offices will be held. |
(b) | Meetings of the Board shall be presided over by the chairperson of the Board or, in his or her absence, by the director who is designated by the chairperson of the Board prior to the applicable meeting, if any, or, in his or her absence, by the deputy chairperson of the Board, if any, or, in his or her absence, by a chairperson chosen at the meeting. The general counsel of the Company shall act as secretary of the meeting, but in his or her absence, the chair of the meeting may appoint any person to act as secretary of the meeting. |
(a) | The Board, at a meeting at which a quorum is present, may exercise any authorities, powers and discretions vested in or exercisable by the Board under these articles. |
(b) | Questions arising at a meeting of the Board must be decided by a majority of votes cast by the directors present and entitled to vote on the matter. |
(a) | A resolution in writing signed by all directors or a resolution in writing of which notice has been given to all directors and which is signed by all directors entitled to vote on the resolution is a valid resolution of the Board. The resolution is taken to have been passed by a meeting of the Board when the last director signs or consents to the resolution unless provided otherwise in such written resolution. |
(b) | A director may consent to a resolution by: |
(1) | signing the document containing the resolution (or a copy of that document); or |
(2) | giving to the Company a written notice (including by fax to its registered office or other electronic means) addressed to the general counsel or to the chairperson of the Board signifying assent to the resolution and either setting out its terms or otherwise clearly identifying them. |
(a) | a defect in the appointment of a person as a director or a member of a committee; or |
(b) | a person so appointed being disqualified or not being entitled to vote, |
(a) | Notwithstanding any other provisions of these articles, the Company must not engage in any business combination with any interested member for a period of three (3) years following the time that such member became an interested member, unless: |
(1) | prior to such time the Board approved either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the member becoming an interested member; |
(2) | upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the member becoming an interested member, the interested member owned at least 85% of the voting shares of the Company outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the voting shares outstanding (but not the outstanding voting shares owned by the interested member) those shares owned: |
(A) | by persons who are directors and also officers; and |
(B) | employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender, exchange or takeover offer; or |
(3) | at or subsequent to such time the business combination is approved by the Board and authorised at a general meeting, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting shares which is not owned by the interested member. |
(b) | The restrictions contained in article 9.1(a) shall not apply if: |
(1) | the Company does not have a class of voting shares that is either: |
(A) | listed on a stock exchange; or |
(B) | held of record by more than 2,000 members, unless any of the foregoing results from action taken, directly or indirectly, by an interested member or from a transaction in which a person becomes an interested member; |
(2) | a member becomes an interested member inadvertently and: |
(A) | as soon as practicable divests itself of ownership of sufficient shares so that the member ceases to be an interested member; and |
(B) | would not, at any time within the three (3)-year period immediately prior to a business combination between the Company and such member, have been an interested member but for the inadvertent acquisition of ownership; or |
(3) | the business combination is proposed prior to the consummation or abandonment of and subsequent to the earlier of the public announcement or the notice required hereunder of a proposed transaction which: |
(A) | constitutes one of the transactions described in article 9.1(c); |
(B) | is with or by a person who either was not an interested member during the previous three (3) years or who became an interested member with the approval of the Board or during the period described in article 9.1(b)(1); and |
(C) | is approved or not opposed by a majority of the members of the Board then in office (but not less than one (1)) who were directors prior to any person becoming an interested member during the previous three (3) years or were recommended for election or elected to succeed such directors by a majority of such directors. |
(4) | the business combination is with an interested member who became an interested member at a time when the restrictions contained in this article 9.1 did not apply by reason of article 9.1(b)(1). |
(c) | The proposed transactions referred to in article 9.1(b)(3)(A) are limited to: |
(1) | a merger or consolidation of the Company (except for a merger in respect of which no vote of the members of the Company is required); |
(2) | a sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition (in one transaction or a series of transactions), whether as part of a dissolution or otherwise, of assets of the Company or of any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company (other than to any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary or to the Company) having an aggregate market value equal to 50% or more of either that aggregate market value of all of the assets of the Company determined on a consolidated basis or the aggregate market value of all the outstanding shares of the Company; or |
(3) | a proposed tender, exchange or takeover offer for 50% or more of the outstanding voting shares of the Company. |
(d) | The Company shall give not less than twenty (20) days’ notice to all interested members prior to the consummation of any of the transactions described in article 9.1(c)(1) or 9.1(c)(2). |
(e) | As used in this article 9.1, the term: |
(1) | Associate, when used to indicate a relationship with any person, means: |
(A) | any corporation, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity of which such person is a director, officer or partner or is, directly or indirectly, the owner of 20% or more of any class of voting shares; |
(B) | any trust or other estate in which such person has at least a 20% beneficial interest or as to which such person serves as trustee or in a similar fiduciary capacity; and |
(C) | any relative or spouse of such person, or any relative of such spouse, who has the same residence as such person; |
(2) | Business combination, when used in reference to the Company and any interested member of the Company, means: |
(A) | any merger or consolidation of the Company (including by way of compromise, arrangement, reconstruction, amalgamation or takeover) or any direct or indirect majority- owned subsidiary of the Company with (A) the interested member, or (B) with any other corporation, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity if the merger or consolidation is caused by the interested member and as a result of such merger or consolidation article 9.1(a) is not applicable to the surviving entity; |
(B) | any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition (in one transaction or a series of transactions), except proportionately as a member of the Company, to or with the interested member, whether as part of a dissolution or otherwise, of assets of the Company or of any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company which assets have an aggregate market value equal to 10% or more of either the aggregate market value of all the assets of the Company determined on a consolidated basis or the aggregate market value of all the outstanding shares of the Company; |
(C) | any transaction which results in the issuance or transfer by the Company or by any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company of any shares of the Company or of such subsidiary to the interested member, except: |
(i) | pursuant to the exercise, exchange or conversion of securities exercisable for, exchangeable for or convertible into shares of the Company or any such subsidiary which securities were outstanding prior to the time that the interested member became such; |
(ii) | pursuant to a merger of the Company with or into a single direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company; |
(iii) | pursuant to a dividend or distribution paid or made, or the exercise, exchange or conversion of securities exercisable for, exchangeable for or convertible into shares of the Company or any such subsidiary which security is distributed, pro rata to all holders of a class or series of shares of the Company subsequent to the time the interested member became such; |
(iv) | pursuant to an exchange offer by the Company to purchase shares made on the same terms to all holders of said shares; or |
(v) | any issuance or transfer of shares by the Company; |
(D) | any transaction involving the Company or any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company which has the effect, directly or indirectly, of increasing the proportionate share of the shares of any class or series, or securities convertible into the shares of any class or series, of the Company or of any such subsidiary which is owned by the interested member, except as a result of immaterial changes due to fractional share adjustments or as a result of any purchase or redemption of any shares not caused, directly or indirectly, by the interested member; or |
(E) | any receipt by the interested member of the benefit, directly or indirectly (except proportionately as a member of the Company), of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits (other than those expressly permitted in clauses (A)-(D) of this article 9.1(e)(2)) provided by or through the Company or any direct or indirect majority- owned subsidiary; |
(3) | Interested member means any person (other than the Company and any direct or indirect majority-owned subsidiary of the Company) that: |
(A) | is the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting shares of the Company; or |
(B) | is an affiliate or associate of the Company and was the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting shares of the Company at any time within the three (3)-year period immediately prior to the date on which it is sought to be determined whether such person is an interested member, and the affiliates and associates of such person; |
(4) | Owner, including the terms own and owned, when used with respect to any shares, means a person that individually or with or through any of its affiliates or associates: |
(A) | beneficially owns such shares, directly or indirectly; or |
(B) | has (i) the right to acquire such shares (whether such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time) pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, or upon the exercise of conversion rights, exchange rights, warrants or options, or otherwise; provided, however, that a person shall not be deemed the owner of shares tendered pursuant to a tender, exchange or takeover offer made by such person or any of such person’s affiliates or associates until such tendered shares are accepted for purchase or exchange; or (ii) the right to vote such shares pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding; provided, however, that a person shall not be deemed the owner of any shares because of such person’s right to vote such shares if the agreement, arrangement or understanding to vote such shares arises solely from a revocable proxy or consent given in response to a proxy or consent solicitation made to ten (10) or more persons; or |
(C) | has any agreement, arrangement or understanding for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting (except voting pursuant to a revocable proxy or consent as described in clause (B) of this article 9.1(e)(4)), or disposing of such shares with any other person that beneficially owns, or whose affiliates or associates beneficially own, directly or indirectly, such shares. |
(a) | The Board may appoint one or more of the directors to be an officer. For the avoidance of doubt, an officer need not be a director. |
(b) | A director who is an officer may be referred to by any title the Board decides on. |
(a) | The officers of the Company shall be a chief executive officer, one or more vice presidents, a secretary, a treasurer, and a controller, all of whom shall be elected by the Board. The Board or the chief executive officer of the Company may appoint such other officers, including one or more assistant secretaries, assistant treasurers and assistant controllers as either of them shall deem necessary, who shall have such authority and perform such duties as may be prescribed in such appointment. |
(b) | The appointment of an officer may be for the period, at the remuneration and on the conditions the Board decides. |
(c) | The Board may: |
(1) | delegate to or give an officer any powers, discretions and duties it decides; |
(2) | withdraw, suspend or vary any of the powers, discretions and duties given to an officer; and |
(3) | authorise the officer to delegate any of the powers, discretions and duties given to the officer. |
(d) | Unless the Board decides otherwise, the office of a director who is employed by the Company or by a subsidiary of the Company automatically becomes vacant if the director ceases to be so employed. |
(e) | An act done by a person acting as an officer is not invalidated by: |
(1) | a defect in the person’s appointment as an officer; |
(2) | the person being disqualified to be an officer; or |
(3) | the person having vacated office, |
(a) | to each person who is or has been a director or officer (within the meaning of article 10.2(a)) of the Company; and |
(b) | to such other officers or former officers of the Company or of its related bodies corporate as the Board in each case determines; |
(a) | is enforceable without the Officer having to first incur any expense or make any payment; |
(b) | is a continuing obligation and is enforceable by the Officer even though the Officer may have ceased to be a director or officer of the Company or its related bodies corporate; and |
(c) | applies to Liabilities incurred both before and after the adoption of these articles. |
(a) | purchase and maintain insurance; and/or |
(b) | pay or agree to pay a premium for insurance, |
(a) | affects any other right or remedy that a person to whom those articles apply may have in respect of any Liability referred to in those articles; |
(b) | limits the capacity of the Company to indemnify or provide or pay for insurance for any person to whom those articles do not apply; or |
(c) | limits or diminishes the terms of any indemnity conferred or agreement to indemnify entered into prior to the adoption of these articles. |
(a) | if the Company is wound up and the property of the Company available for distribution among the members is more than sufficient to pay: |
(1) | all the debts and liabilities of the Company; and |
(2) | the costs, charges and expenses of the winding up, |
(b) | for the purpose of calculating the excess referred to in article 12.1(a), any amount unpaid on a share is to be treated as property of the Company; |
(c) | the amount of the excess that would otherwise be distributed to the holder of a partly paid share under article 12.1(a) must be reduced by the amount unpaid on that share at the date of the distribution; and |
(d) | if the effect of the reduction under article 12.1(c) would be to reduce the distribution to the holder of a partly paid share to a negative amount, the holder must contribute that amount to the Company. |
(a) | If the Company is wound up, the liquidator or the directors, as the case may be, may, subject to these articles and any other sanction required by the Companies Law, do either or both of the following: |
(1) | divide in specie among the members the whole or any part of the assets of the Company and, for that purpose, value any assets and determine how the division shall be carried out as between the members or different classes of members; |
(2) | vest the whole or any part of the assets in trustees for the benefit of members and those liable to contribute to the winding up. |
(b) | No member shall be compelled to accept any assets if an obligation attaches to them. |
(c) | If any of the property to be divided under article 12.2(a) includes securities with a liability to calls, any person entitled under the division to any of the securities may, within ten (10) days after the passing of the special resolution referred to in article 12.2(a), by written notice direct the liquidator to sell the person’s proportion of the securities and account for the net proceeds. The liquidator must, if practicable, act accordingly. |
(d) | Nothing in this article 12.2 takes away from or affects any right to exercise any statutory or other power which would have existed if this article were omitted. |
(e) | Article 4.3 applies, so far as it can and with any necessary changes, to a division by a liquidator under article 12.2(a) as if references in article 4.3 to: |
(1) | the Board were references to the liquidator; and |
(2) | a distribution or capitalisation were references to the division under article 12.2(a). |
(a) | A person who is not a director does not have the right to inspect any of the Board papers, books, records or documents of the Company, except as provided by law, or these articles, or as authorised by the Board. |
(b) | The Company may enter into contracts with its directors or former directors agreeing to provide continuing access for a specified period after the director ceases to be a director to Board papers, books, records and documents of the Company which relate to the period during which the director or former director was a director on such terms and conditions as the Board thinks fit and which are not inconsistent with this article 13. |
(c) | The Company may procure that its subsidiaries provide similar access to Board papers, books, records or documents as that set out in articles 13(a) and 13(b). |
(d) | This article 13 does not limit any right the directors or former directors otherwise have. |
(a) | The Company may keep a Seal register and, on affixing the Seal to any document (other than a certificate for securities of the Company) may enter in the register particulars of the document, including a short description of the document. |
(b) | The register, or any details from it that the Board requires, may be produced at meetings of the Board for noting the use of the Seal since the previous meeting of the Board. |
(c) | Failure to comply with articles 14.5(a) or 14.5(b) does not invalidate any document to which the Seal is properly affixed. |
(a) | The Company may have one or more duplicate seals for use in place of its common seal outside the state or territory where its common seal is kept. Each duplicate seal must be a facsimile of the common seal of the Company with the addition on its face of the words ‘duplicate seal’ and the name of the place where it is to be used. |
(b) | A document sealed with a duplicate seal, or a certificate seal as provided in article 14.7, is to be taken to have been sealed with the common seal of the Company. |
(a) | Without limiting any other way in which notice may be given to a member under these articles, the Companies Law, applicable securities laws and/or the Listing Rules, the Company may give a notice to a member by: |
(1) | delivering it personally to the member; |
(2) | sending it by prepaid post to the member’s address in the register of members or any other address the member supplies to the Company for giving notices; |
(3) | sending it by fax or other electronic means to the fax number or electronic address the member has supplied to the Company for giving notices; or |
(4) | publishing the notice on a website and providing notification to that effect to the member by any of the other means permitted under this article 15.1. |
(b) | The Company may give a notice to the joint holders of a share by giving the notice in the way authorised by article 15.1(a) to the joint holder named first in the register of members for the share. |
(c) | The Company may give a notice to a person entitled to a share as a result of a Transmission Event by delivering it or sending it in the manner authorised by article 15.1(a) addressed to the name or title of the person, to: |
(1) | the address, fax number or electronic address that person has supplied to the Company for giving notices to that person; or |
(2) | if that person has not supplied an address, fax number or electronic address, to the address, fax number or electronic address to which the notice might have been sent if that Transmission Event had not occurred. |
(d) | A notice given to a member under articles 15.1(a) or 15.1(b) is, even if a Transmission Event has occurred and whether or not the Company has notice of that occurrence: |
(1) | duly given for any shares registered in that person’s name, whether solely or jointly with another person; and |
(2) | sufficiently served on any person entitled to the shares because of the Transmission Event. |
(e) | A notice given to a person who is entitled to a share because of a Transmission Event is sufficiently served on the member in whose name the share is registered. |
(f) | A person who, because of a transfer of shares, becomes entitled to any shares registered in the name of a member, is taken to have received every notice which, before that person’s name and address is entered in the register of members for those shares, is given to the member complying with this article 15.1. |
(g) | A signature to any notice given by the Company to a member under this article 15.1 may be printed or affixed by some mechanical, electronic or other means. |
(h) | Where a member does not have a registered address or where the Company believes that member is not known at the member’s registered address, all notices are taken to be: |
(1) | given to the member if the notice is exhibited in the Company’s registered office for a period of forty-eight (48) hours; and |
(2) | served at the commencement of that period, |
(a) | delivering it personally to him or her; |
(b) | sending it by prepaid post to his or her usual residential or business address, or any other address he or she has supplied to the Company for giving notices; or |
(c) | sending it by fax or other electronic means to the fax number or electronic address he or she has supplied to the Company for giving notices. |
(a) | delivering it to the Company’s registered office; |
(b) | sending it by prepaid post to the Company’s registered office; or |
(c) | sending it by fax or other electronic means to the principal fax number or electronic address at the Company’s registered office. |
(a) | A notice from the Company properly addressed and posted is taken to be served at 10.00am (local time in the place of dispatch) on the day after the date it is posted. |
(b) | A certificate signed by a secretary or officer of the Company to the effect that a notice was duly posted under these articles is conclusive evidence of that fact. |
(c) | Where the Company sends a notice by fax, the notice is taken as served at the time the fax is sent if the correct fax number appears on the facsimile transmission report produced by the sender’s fax machine. |
(d) | Where the Company sends a notice by electronic transmission, the notice is taken as served at the time the electronic transmission is sent. |
(e) | Where the Company gives a notice to a member by any other means permitted by the Companies Law relating to the giving of notices and electronic means of access to them, the notice is taken as given at 10.00am (local time in the place of the Company’s principal office) on the day after the date on which the member is notified that the notice is available. |
(f) | Where a given number of days’ notice or notice extending over any other period must be given, the day of service is not to be counted in the number of days or other period. |
(a) | Each member submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Royal Court of Jersey and the courts which may hear appeals from that court. |
(b) | Unless the Companies Law or any other Jersey law provides otherwise or unless the Board determines otherwise, the Royal Court of Jersey is the sole and exclusive forum for: |
(1) | any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, |
(2) | any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer of the Company to the Company or its members, creditors or other constituents, |
(3) | any action asserting a claim against the Company or any director or officer of the Company arising pursuant to any provision of the Companies Law or these articles (as either may be amended from time to time), or |
(4) | any action asserting a claim against the Company or any director or officer of the Company governed by the internal affairs doctrine. |
(a) | Any provision of, or the application of any provision of, these articles which is prohibited in any place is, in that place, ineffective only to the extent of that prohibition. |
(b) | Any provision of, or the application of any provision of, these articles which is void, illegal or unenforceable in any place does not affect the validity, legality or enforceability of that provision in any other place or of the remaining provisions in that or any other place. |
(a) | The directors may, from time to time, and except as required by applicable law or the Listing Rules, adopt, institute, amend, modify or revoke the corporate governance policies or initiatives, which shall be intended to set forth the policies of the Company and the directors on various corporate governance related matters, as the directors shall determine from time to time. |
1. | reviewed a draft of the Transaction Agreement dated May 9, 2023; |
2. | reviewed publicly available financial statements and other information of each of the Company and Allkem; |
3. | reviewed certain internal financial statements and other financial and operating information of each of the Company and Allkem, respectively; |
4. | reviewed certain non-public projected financial data relating to Allkem prepared by the management of Allkem (the “Allkem Projections”), which data was adjusted by the management of the Company resulting in two Company adjusted Allkem cases (the “Company-Allkem Projections”); |
5. | reviewed certain non-public projected financial data relating to the Company prepared and furnished to us by the management of the Company (together with the Allkem Projections and the Company-Allkem Projections, the “Projections”); |
6. | reviewed information relating to certain strategic, financial, operational and operating model tax efficiency benefits anticipated from the Transaction, prepared by the management of the Company and the management of Allkem (the “Synergies”); |
7. | reviewed certain analyses and forecasts for the Company pro-forma for the Transaction, as approved for our use by the Company (the “Pro Forma Projections”); |
8. | reviewed certain estimates of lithium reserves and resources for Allkem prepared by its management and third-party engineering firms, which data was adjusted and extrapolated by the management of the Company (the “Allkem Resources Estimates”); |
9. | reviewed certain estimates of lithium reserves and resources for the Company prepared by its management and third-party engineering firms (together with the Allkem Resources Estimates, the “Resources Estimates”); |
10. | reviewed certain lithium price assumptions and the outlook for future lithium prices published by independent information service providers and Company provided their lithium price assumptions (including price sensitivity) for lithium hydroxide, lithium carbonate and spodumene for use in the analysis (the “Pricing Assumptions”); |
11. | discussed the past and current operations and financial condition and the prospects of Allkem and of the Company with senior executives of the Company; |
12. | compared the financial terms of the Transaction with the publicly available financial terms of certain transactions which we believe to be generally relevant; |
13. | reviewed the historical trading prices and trading activity for the Allkem Common Stock and Company Common Stock; |
14. | performed such other studies and analyses, reviewed such other information and considered such other factors as we deemed appropriate. |
By: | | | /s/ Gordan E. Dyal | | | |
| | Name: Gordon E. Dyal | | | ||
| | Title: Founding Partner | | |
Item 20. | Indemnification of Directors and Officers |
“(1) | Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), any provision, whether contained in the articles of, or in a contract with, a company or otherwise, whereby the company or any of its subsidiaries or any other person, for some benefit conferred or detriment suffered directly or indirectly by the company, agrees to exempt any person from, or indemnify any person against, any liability which by law would otherwise attach to the person by reason of the fact that the person is or was an officer of the company shall be void. |
(2) | Paragraph (1) does not apply to a provision for exempting a person from or indemnifying the person against— |
a. | any liabilities incurred in defending any proceedings (whether civil or criminal)— |
(i) | in which judgment is given in the person’s favour or the person is acquitted, |
(ii) | which are discontinued otherwise than for some benefit conferred by the person or on the person’s behalf or some detriment suffered by the person, or |
(iii) | which are settled on terms which include such benefit or detriment and, in the opinion of a majority of the directors of the company (excluding any director who conferred such benefit or on whose behalf such benefit was conferred or who suffered such detriment), the person was substantially successful on the merits in the person’s resistance to the proceedings; |
b. | any liability incurred otherwise than to the company if the person acted in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company; |
c. | any liability incurred in connection with an application made under Article 212 in which relief is granted to the person by the court; or |
d. | any liability against which the company normally maintains insurance for persons other than directors. |
(3) | Nothing in this Article shall deprive a person of any exemption or indemnity to which the person was lawfully entitled in respect of anything done or omitted by the person before the coming into force of this Article. |
(4) | This Article does not prevent a company from purchasing and maintaining for any such officer insurance against any such liability.” |
Item 21. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
(a) | The following exhibits are filed herewith unless otherwise indicated: |
Exhibit Number | | | Description |
2.1**^ | | | Transaction Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2023, by and among Allkem Limited, Allkem Livent plc (originally named Lightning-A Limited), Livent Corporation, and Lightning-A Merger Sub, Inc., as amended by the Amendment to Transaction Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2023, and as may be further amended from time to time (included as Annex A to the proxy statement/prospectus) |
3.1* | | | Memorandum of Association of NewCo |
3.2* | | | Articles of Association of NewCo |
3.3* | | | Form of Memorandum of Association of NewCo to be adopted in connection with closing of the transaction (included as Annex B to the proxy statement/prospectus) |
| | Form of Articles of Association of NewCo to be adopted in connection with closing of the transaction (included as Annex B to the proxy statement/prospectus) | |
| | Indenture, dated as of June 25, 2020, between Livent Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022) | |
| | Form of 4.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2025 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022) | |
5.1* | | | Opinion of Ogier (Jersey) LLP as to the legality of the ordinary shares to be issued by NewCo |
8.1# | | | Opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP as to certain U.S. federal income tax matters |
10.1* | | | Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2018, by and between Livent Corporation and FMC Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022) |
10.2* | | | Agreement dated as of February 21, 1991, as amended among the Province of Catamarca, Argentina, FMC Corporation and Minera del Altiplano S.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022) |
10.3* | | | Credit Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2018, among Livent Corporation, Livent USA Corp., the guarantor subsidiaries described therein, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders and issuing banks listed therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022) |
10.4* | | | First Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated May 6, 2020, by and among Livent Corporation, Livent USA Corp., the guarantor subsidiaries described therein, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders and issuing banks listed therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022) |
| | Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated August 3, 2020, by and among Livent Corporation, Livent USA Corp., the guarantor subsidiaries described therein, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders and issuing banks listed therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022) | |
10.6* | | | Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated November 5, 2021, by and among Livent Corporation, Livent USA Corp., the guarantor subsidiaries described therein, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders and issuing banks listed therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022) |
10.7* | | | Fourth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated December 28, 2021, by and among Livent Corporation, Livent USA Corp., the guarantor subsidiaries described therein, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders and issuing banks listed therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022) |
Exhibit Number | | | Description |
10.8* | | | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Livent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022) |
10.9** | | | Mining Lease 74/244, granted as of December 24, 2009, of Galaxy Lithium Australia Pty Ltd |
21.1* | | | Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
23.1** | | | Consent of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm of Livent Corporation |
| | Consent of Ernst & Young, independent auditors of Allkem Limited | |
23.3** | | | Consent of Integral Consulting Inc. |
| | Consent of Ogier (Jersey) LLP for opinion regarding legality of securities being registered, among other things (included in the opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1 to this Registration Statement) | |
23.5# | | | Consent of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP for opinion regarding certain U.S. federal income tax matters (included in the opinion filed as Exhibit 8.1 to this Registration Statement) |
| | Consent of BBA Inc. | |
| | Consent of DRA Americas Inc. | |
| | Consent of SGS Geological Services | |
| | Consent of Carl Pednault | |
| | Consent of Marc Rougier | |
| | Consent of Mining Plus Pty Ltd. | |
| | Consent of Albert Thamm, F.Aus.IMM | |
| | Consent of Hydrominex Geoscience | |
| | Consent of Gunn Metallurgy | |
| | Consent of Montgomery & Associates Consultores Limitada | |
| | Consent of Gunn Metallurgy | |
| | Consent of Marek Dworzanowski | |
| | Consent of Frederik Reidel | |
| | Consent of SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd | |
| | Consent of Wave International Pty Ltd. | |
| | Consent of WSP Canada Inc. | |
24.1* | | | Powers of Attorney (included on the signature page of this Registration Statement) |
| | Technical Report Summary on Mt Cattlin Lithium Project, prepared by Mining Plus Pty Ltd. and Albert Thamm, F.Aus.IMM, dated August 31, 2023 | |
96.2# | | | Technical Report Summary on Olaroz Lithium Facility, prepared by Hydrominex Geoscience and Gunn Metallurgy, dated August 31, 2023 |
96.3# | | | Technical Report Summary on Sal de Vida Lithium Brine Project, prepared by Montgomery & Associates Consultores Limitada and Gunn Metallurgy, dated August 31, 2023 |
96.4# | | | Technical Report Summary on Cauchari Lithium Brine Project, prepared by Marek Dworzanowski and Frederik Reidel, dated August 31, 2023 |
96.5# | | | Technical Report Summary on James Bay Lithium Project, prepared by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd., Wave International Pty Ltd. and WSP Canada Inc., dated August 31, 2023 |
99.1* | | | Form of Proxy Card for Livent Special Meeting |
| | Fairness Opinion of Gordon Dyal & Co. LLC (included as Annex C to the proxy statement/prospectus) | |
99.3** | | | Consent of Gordon Dyal & Co. LLC |
99.4* | | | Consent of Peter Coleman for naming as director of NewCo |
99.5* | | | Consent of Paul W. Graves for naming as director of NewCo |
| | Consent of Robert Pallash for naming as director of NewCo | |
| | Consent of Pablo Marcet for naming as director of NewCo | |
| | Consent of Steven Merkt for naming as director of NewCo | |
| | Consent of Florencia Heredia for naming as director of NewCo | |
| | Consent of Christina Lampe-Önnerud for naming as director of NewCo | |
| | Consent of Michael Barry for naming as director of NewCo | |
| | Consent of Alan Fitzpatrick for naming as director of NewCo | |
| | Consent of Fernando Oris de Roa for naming as director of NewCo |
Exhibit Number | | | Description |
| | Consent of John Turner for naming as director of NewCo | |
| | Consent of Leanne Heywood for naming as director of NewCo | |
107* | | | Filing Fee Table |
^ | Certain schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K (but will be furnished supplementally to the SEC upon request). |
* | Previously filed or incorporated by reference herein. |
** | Submitted herewith. |
# | To be filed by amendment. |
Item 22. | Undertakings |
(a) | The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes: |
(1) | To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement: |
(i) | to include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; |
(ii) | to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and |
(iii) | to include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement. |
(2) | That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
(3) | To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering. |
(4) | That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness; provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use. |
(5) | That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser: |
(i) | any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424; |
(ii) | any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant; |
(iii) | the portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and |
(iv) | any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser. |
(b) | The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the registrant’s annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
(c) | The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as follows: that prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering prospectus will contain the information called for by the applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the information called for by the other Items of the applicable form. |
(d) | The registrant undertakes that every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant to the paragraph immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and is used in connection with an offering of securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an amendment to the registration statement and will not be used until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
(e) | Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. |
(f) | The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond to requests for information that is incorporated by reference into the prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11, or 13 of this Form, within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or other equally prompt means. This includes information contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of the registration statement through the date of responding to the request. |
(g) | The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in the registration statement when it became effective. |
| | Allkem Livent plc | ||||
| | | ||||
| | By: /s/ Donal Flynn | | |||
| | Name: Donal Flynn | | |||
| | Title: Director | |
Name and Signature | | | Title | | | Date |
| | | | |||
* | | | Chief Executive Officer | | | September 26, 2023 |
Paul Graves | | |||||
| | | | |||
* | | | Director | | | September 26, 2023 |
Juan Carlos Cruz Chellew | | |||||
| | | | |||
* | | | Director | | | September 26, 2023 |
Gilberto Antoniazzi | | |||||
| | | | |||
/s/ Donal Flynn | | | Director | | | September 26, 2023 |
Donal Flynn | | |||||
| | | | |||
* | | | Authorized Representative in the United States | | | September 26, 2023 |
Juan Carlos Cruz Chellew | |
* By: | | | /s/ Donal Flynn | | | |
| | Name: Donal Flynn | | | ||
| | Title: Attorney-in-Fact | | |
Exhibit 10.9
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT
DISCLAIMER: This is not the official Register referred to in Reg. 84C of the Mining Regulations 1981.
MINING LEASE 74/244
Tenement Summary | |||
Identifier : | M 74/244 | District : | PHILLIPS RIVER M.F. |
Current Area : | 1,830.00000 HA | Status : | Live |
Mark Out : | 04/08/2009 11:55:00 | Received : | 07/08/2009 15:59:00 |
Term Granted : | 21 Years | Lodging Office : | PERTH |
Commence : | 24/12/2009 | Expiry : | 23/12/2030 |
Purpose : | Death : | ||
OWNERSHIP DETAILS |
Current Holders
Name and Address | Shares | |
GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN:130182099) | 100 | |
MCMAHON MINING TITLE SERVICES PTY LTD, C/- MCMAHON MINING | ||
TITLE SERVICES PTY LTD, PO BOX 6301, EAST PERTH, WA, 6892, | ||
xxxx@mmts.net.au, xxxxxxxxxxx997 | ||
Total Shares: | 100 |
Holder Changes
Dealing | Status Date | From (Shares) | To (Shares) |
Transfer 348099 | Registered | GALAXY RESOURCES | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA |
02/06/2010 | LIMITED (100) | LIMITED (100) | |
11:26:00 | |||
A to A (Name) 651313 | Recorded | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA |
10/06/2022 | LIMITED (100) | PTY LTD (100) | |
15:50:47 |
Applicants on Receival
Name and Address | Shares | |
GALAXY RESOURCES LIMITED | 100 | |
C/- HETHERINGTON EXPLORATION & MINING TITLE SERVICES PTY LTD, PO BOX 8249 PERTH BUSINESS CENTRE, PERTH, WA, 6849 |
||
Total Shares: | 100 |
DESCRIPTION DETAILS |
Description | ||
Block Type : | Effective From : | |
Locality : | north ravensthorpe | |
Datum : | Datum situated at GDA94 MGA Z51 6283892.395 mN 23136.331 mE | |
Boundary : | Thence : | |
6284025.026 mN 227780.388 mE | ||
6280327.396 mN 227885.145 mE | ||
6280319.627 mN 227750.647 mE |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 1 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
6280184.664 mN 227751.085 mE | ||||
6280051.96 mN 223108.853 mE | ||||
6283749.596 mN 223002.303 mE | ||||
6283753.568 mN 223140.329 mE | ||||
Back to datum | ||||
Area : | Type | Dealing No | Start Date | Area |
Surveyed | 07/11/2012 | 1,830.00000 HA | ||
Granted | 24/12/2009 | 1,832.00000 HA | ||
Applied For | 04/08/2009 | 1,832.00000 HA |
RELATIONSHIPS |
Relationships
Relationship | Dealing No | Dealing Status | Tenement ID | Tenement Status |
Conditional | Surrender - Conditional | Made absolute | M 74/155 | Dead |
Surrender | 326981 | |||
Conditional | Surrender - Conditional | Made absolute | M 74/182 | Dead |
Surrender | 327266 | |||
Conditional | Surrender - Conditional | Made absolute | M 74/12 | Dead |
Surrender | 327267 | |||
Conditional | Surrender - Conditional | Made absolute | M 74/158 | Dead |
Surrender | 336781 | |||
Conditional | Surrender - Conditional | Made absolute | M 74/159 | Dead |
Surrender | 336782 | |||
Conditional | Surrender - Conditional | Made absolute | M 74/196 | Dead |
Surrender | 336783 | |||
Conditional | Surrender - Conditional | Made absolute | M 74/197 | Dead |
Surrender | 336784 | |||
State Agreement Conversions | ||||
Applicable Legislation | Effective Start | Effective End |
SURVEY DETAILS |
Survey
Surveyed Area | Surveyed Date |
Surveyor`s Name | Field Book | Instruction Date |
Project |
1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | GATH, GM | 13 | 22/06/2010 | 12613 |
Standard Plan | Diagram | ||||
66293 |
GENERAL DETAILS |
General | ||||
Objection Closing Date : | 11/09/2009 | Application Fee : | $375.00 | |
File Reference : | Survey Fee : | |||
Receipt Number : | 68138 |
Special Indicator | |||
Special Indicator | Start | End |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 2 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
SHIRE DETAILS |
Shire
Shire | Shire No | Start | End | Area |
RAVENSTHORPE SHIRE | 7420 | 04/08/2009 | 1,830.00000 HA |
NATIVE TITLE DETAILS |
Native Title Referrals | |||
DISCLAIMER: Complete Native Title Information is not available for this Tenement/Amalgamation | |||
Date Referred | Referral Type | Procedure | Current Status |
12/08/2009 | Tenement Application | NT Cleared |
GRANT DETAILS |
Recommendation
Recommended for : | Grant | 22/10/2009 |
Grant | ||||
Granted : 24/12/2009 | Holder Notified : | 24/12/2009 | Licence/Lease | |
issued : |
Term | ||||
Term : 21 Years | From : | 24/12/2009 | To : 23/12/2030 |
ENDORSEMENTS/CONDITIONS DETAILS |
Endorsements and Conditions
# | ENDORSEMENTS | Start Date | End Date |
1 | The lessee’s attention is drawn to the provisions of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 and any Regulations thereunder. | 24/12/2009 | |
2 | The lessee’s attention is drawn to the Environmental Protection Act 1986 and the Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004, which provides for the protection of all native vegetation from damage unless prior permission is obtained. | 24/12/2009 | |
3 | The grant of this lease does not include any private land referred to in Section 29(2) of the Mining Act 1978 except that below 30 metres from the natural surface of the land. | 24/12/2009 | |
4 | 05/04/2011 | 29/07/2013 | |
03/02/2011 | 04/04/2011 | ||
20/01/2010 | 02/02/2011 | ||
5 | Compliance with the “ | 19/06/2012 | |
● Waterways Conservation Act, 1976; | |||
● Rights in Water and Irrigation Act, 1914; | |||
● Metropolitan Water Supply, Sewerage and Drainage Act, 1909; | |||
● Country Areas Water Supply Act, 1947; | |||
● Water Agencies (Powers) Act, 1984; and | |||
● Water Resources Legislation Amendment Act, 2007. |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 3 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | ENDORSEMENTS | Start Date | End Date |
6 | The rights of ingress to and egress from the mining tenement being at all times preserved to officers of Department of Water for Inspection and Investigation purposes. | 19/06/2012 | |
7 | The storage and disposal of petroleum hydrocarbons, chemicals and potentially hazardous substances being in accordance with the current published version of the Department of Water’s relevant Water Quality Protection Notes and Guidelines for mining and mineral processing. | 19/06/2012 | |
8 | The abstraction of groundwater is prohibited unless a current licence to construct/alter a well and a licence to take groundwater has been issued by the DoW. | 19/06/2012 | |
Private Land | 26/06/2018 | ||
9 | By approval the grant of this lease is amended to include Lot 36 on Deposited Plan 80856 and Lot 177 on Deposited Plan 141641 to a depth of 30 metres from the natural surface. | 26/06/2018 | |
10 | By approval the grant of this lease is amended to include Lot 23 on Deposited Plan 80826 and Lot 176 on Deposited Plan 141643 to a depth of 30 metres from the natural surface. | 22/08/2018 | |
11 | By approval the grant of this lease is amended to include Lot 261 on deposited plan 146658 to a depth of 30 metres from the natural surface. | 07/11/2018 | |
12 | By approval the grant of this lease is amended to include Lot 31 on Deposited Plan 224145 and Lot 127 on Deposited Plan 145763 to a depth of 30 metres from the natural surface. | 22/11/2018 | |
13 | By approval the grant of this lease is amended to include Lot 28 on Deposited Plan 224145, Lot 253 on Deposited Plan 401420 and Lot 254 on Deposited Plan 401421 to a depth of 30 metres from the natural surface. | 28/11/2018 | |
14 | By approval the grant of this lease is amended to include Lot 50 and 51 on Deposited Plan 29986, Lot 251 on Deposited Plan 401418, Lot 318 on Deposited Plan 150052 and Lot 1433 on Deposited Plan 216162 to a depth of 30 metres from the natural surface. | 17/04/2019 |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 4 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
11 | Prior to any ground disturbing activities within FNA 362 outlined in red in Tengraph (Hawks Nest Heritage Site) the lessee obtaining the written approval of the Environmental Officer DMP in consultation with the Shire of Ravensthorpe. | 24/12/2009 | ||
12 | Mining on any road or road reserve being confined to below a depth of 15 metres from the natural surface. | 24/12/2009 | ||
13 | The construction and operation of the project and measures to protect the environment being carried out generally in accordance with the document titled: | 12/05/2022 | ||
● | “Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project Mining Proposal” (Reg ID 22377) dated 29 July 2009 sgned by Terry Stark and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. T3251/200901; | |||
● | “Revised Closure Capping of Tailings Storage Facility Memorandum” dated 18 August 2009 sgned by Clive Saunders and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. T3251/200901; | |||
● | “Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project, Addendum to Mining Proposal (Reg ID 22377)” dated 26 February 2010 signed by Terry Stark and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. E0069/201001; | |||
● | “Revised Design for Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project Tailings Storage Facility - Original Mining Proposal ID 22377” (Reg ID 26415) dated 2 March 2010 signed by Terry Stark and retained on Department of Mines and Petrolem File No. E0085/200904; | |||
● | Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project - Addendum to Mining Proposal (ID 22377) Temporary water storage - dust suppression dam and associated stand pipe (Reg ID 26226) dated 26 February 2010 signed by Terry Stark and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. E0081/201001; | |||
● | Email entitled: Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project Addendum to Mining Proposal 22377 Temporary water storage - dust supression dam and associated stand pipe (Reg ID 26226) dated 8 July 2010 signed by Chris Rainsford and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. E0081/201001; | |||
● | Email entitled: Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project Addendum to Mining Proposal 22377 Temporary water storage - dust supression dam and associated stand pipe (Reg ID 26226) dated 13 August 2010 signed by Chris Rainsford and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. E0081/201001; | |||
● | Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project - Addendum to Mining Proposal (ID 22377) Production Bores and Water Pipeline (Reg ID 27158) dated 2 June 2010 signed by Terry Stark and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. E0081/201001; | |||
● | Email entitled: Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project Addendum to Mining Proposal 22377 Production Bores and Water Pipeline M74/244 (Reg ID 27158) dated 16 August 2010 signed by Terry Stark and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. E0081/201001; | |||
● | “Mining Proposal - Temporary Spodumene Product Stockpile Area - Ravensthorpe Lithium Project Galaxy Resources Limited - Mining Lease 74/244” dated 8 November 2010 and signed by Chris Rainsford and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. E0106/200701; | |||
● | “Mining Proposal - Temporary Spodumene Product Stockpile Area - Ravensthorpe Lithium Project Galaxy Resources Limited - Mining Lease 74/244” dated 10 November 2010 and signed by Chris Rainsford and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. E0106/200701; | |||
● | “Ravensthorpe Spodume Project - Addendum to Mining Proposal (Reg ID 22377) Mobile Screening Plant M74/244” (Reg ID 29375) dated 24 December 2010 signed by Chris Ranisford and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. E0009/201101; | |||
● | “Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project Addendum to Mining Proposal (ID 22377) Waste Dump and Infrastructure Expansion M74/244” (Reg ID 29171) dated 29 November 2010 signed by Chris Rainsford and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. E0420/201001; | |||
● | “Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project - Addendum to Mining Proposal (ID 22377) Waste Dump and Infrastructure Expansion (ID 29171), M74/244 - Response to Queries” dated 19 January 2011 signed by Chris Rainsford and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. E0420/201001; | |||
● | “Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project - Addendum to Mining Proposal (ID 22377) Production Bores 11 and 28, and the Installation of Production Water Pipeline M74/244” dated April 2011 (Reg. ID 30493) signed by Chris Rainsford and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum file No. EARS-MP-30493; |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 5 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
● | “Reply to email dated 19 April 2011 - Mining Proposal - Production Bores 11 & 28” dated 29 April 2011 signed by Chris Rainsford and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum file No. EARS-MP-30493; | |||
● | “Programme of Work on M74/244 for Galaxy Resources Limited” (Reg. ID 34937) dated 1 June 2012 signed by Chris Rainsford, Revised Bore Design titled: “Reg. ID 34937 - PoWE - Revised Angled Bore Design Headworks - M74/244” dated 13 June 2012 signed by John Fletcher and document titled: “Reg. ID - PoWE - Ravensthorpe Spodumene Project - Mt Cattlin Operation. Addendum to Programme of Work ID 34937 - Supporting Document for an Application for a Permit to Interfere with Bed and Banks” dated 4 April 2012, signed by Chris Rainsford. All documents retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum file No. EARS-POW-34937; | |||
● | (MP Reg ID 35423) “Waste Dump, ROM, Water Retention Dams Expansion and Other Infrastructure. Revised Addendum to Mining Proposal (ID 22377). Mt Cattlin. M74/244” dated 6 June 2013 signed by John Fletcher and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. EARS-MP-35423; | |||
● | (MP Reg ID 35423) “Waste Dump, ROM, Water Retention Dams Expansion and Other Infrastructure. Revised Addendum to Mining Proposal (ID 22377)” dated 10 October 2013 signed by John Fletcher and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. EARS-MP-35423; | |||
● | (MP Reg ID 59053) “Mt Cattlin Spodumene Project Mining Proposal Addendum - Amendment to Processing Circuit and Temporary Tailings Storage M74/244” dated 5 April 2016 signed by Benjamin Lane and retained on Department of Mines and Petroleum File No. EARS-MP-59053 as Doc ID 4170400; | |||
● | (MP Reg ID 69112) “Mt Cattlin Spondumene Project Development of the Dowling Pit SW Extension - M74/244 - Revised Amendment #10 to Mining Proposal 22377 - Reg ID 69112” dated 22 November 2017 signed by Brian Talbot, General Manager and retained on Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety File No. EARS-MPMCP-69112 as Doc ID 5403236; | |||
● | (MP Reg ID 73856) “Revised Mining Proposal Reg ID 73856 Mt Cattlin Lithium Project Stage 2 Expansion East of Floater Road M74/244” dated 20 August 2018 signed by Brian Talbot, and retained on Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety File No. EARS-MP-73856 as Doc ID 5980860; | |||
● | (MP Reg ID 77030) “Revised Mining Proposal Galaxy Lithium Australia Limited Mt Cattlin Lithium Project M74/244 Perimeter Safety Fence” dated 12 November 2018 signed by James Hesford, and retained on Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety File No. EARS-MP-77030 as Doc ID 6144521; | |||
● | Deposition M74/244” dated 5 July 2019 signed by Brian Talbot – Chief Operating Officer, and retained on Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety File No. EARS-MP-79096 as Doc ID 6659403; | |||
● | (MP Reg ID 82027) “Revised Mining Proposal REG ID 82027 Mt Cattlin Lithium Project” dated 3 June 2020 signed by Keith Muller, and retained on Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety File No. EARS-MP-82027 as Doc ID 7438496 | |||
Where a difference exists between the above document(s) and the following conditions, then the following conditions shall prevail. | ||||
27/08/2020 | 11/05/2022 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 6 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 7 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
17/06/2020 | 26/08/2020 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 8 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 9 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
19/07/2019 | 16/06/2020 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 10 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
13/03/2019 | 18/07/2019 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 11 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 12 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
13/12/2018 | 12/03/2019 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 13 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
07/09/2018 | 12/12/2018 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 14 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 15 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
06/12/2017 | 06/09/2018 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 16 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
30/05/2016 | 05/12/2017 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 17 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 18 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
29/05/2014 | 29/05/2016 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 19 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
19/12/2013 | 28/05/2014 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 20 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
19/06/2012 | 18/12/2013 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 21 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
16/06/2011 | 18/06/2012 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 22 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
05/04/2011 | 15/06/2011 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 23 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
03/02/2011 | 04/04/2011 | |||
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 24 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
14/06/2010 | 02/02/2011 | |||
06/05/2010 | 13/06/2010 | |||
20/01/2010 | 05/05/2010 | |||
14 | The development and operation of the project being carried out in such a manner so as to create the minimum practicable disturbance to the existing vegetation and natural landform. | 20/01/2010 | ||
15 | All topsoil being removed ahead of all mining operations from sites such as pit areas, waste disposal areas, ore stockpile areas, pipeline, haul roads and new access roads and being stockpiled for later respreading or immediately respread as rehabilitation progresses. | 20/01/2010 |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 25 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 26 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 27 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date | |
|
||||
11/01/2012 | 28/05/2014 | |||
|
||||
33 | Steel casing for the Cattlin Creek borehole must be installed to a depth that the PVC bore casing is fully encapsulated by unweathered rock. A drill report which includes drill records to verify the casing encapsulation, a GPS location and photos, must be provided to an Environmental Officer DMP within one (1) month of the hole being drilled. | 19/06/2012 | ||
34 | The Lessee must inspect and assess the stability of the Cattle Creek borehole headwork immediately after each rainfall event that results in stream flow within the Cattlin Creek (this monitoring is to be reported in the annual environmental report required by Condition 17). Any damage or failure of the headwork must be reported to DMP within 24 hours of being observed, and a corrective action plan to address any damage or failure of the headwork must be provided to DMP within seven (7) days of this notification. All damage or failure must be repaired to the satisfaction of an Environmental Officer DMP. | 19/06/2012 | ||
35 | At closure the Cattlin Creek borehole must be permanently sealed to prevent water flow into the underground workings and all headwork structures removed from site. The closure, sealing and rehabilitation of the Cattlin Creek borehold must be to the satisfaction of an Environmental Officer, DMP. | 19/06/2012 | ||
36 | At the completion of operations, all buildings and structures being removed from site or demolished and buried to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment Division, DMP. | 29/05/2014 | ||
37 | All rubbish and scrap is to be progressively disposed of in a suitable manner. | 29/05/2014 | ||
38 | Placement of waste material must be such that the final footprint after rehabilitation will not be impacted upon by pit wall subsidenceor be within thezone of pit instability. | 29/05/2014 | ||
39 | On the completion of operations or progressively when possible, all waste dumps, tailings storage facilities, stockpiles or other mining related landforms must be rehabilitated to form safe, stable, non-polluting structures which are integrated with the surrounding landscape and support self sustaining, functional ecosystems comprising suitable, local provenance species or alternative agreed outcome to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment Division, DMP. | 29/05/2014 | ||
Consent to mine on Floater Road granted subject to: | 27/11/2017 | |||
40 | Mining activities being confined to those outlined in a letter from Galaxy Lithium Australia Limited dated 26 October 2017 and titled “Mt Cattlin Spodumene Project: Request for consent to establish borefield infrastructure in Floater Road Reserve - M74/244” and to the attachment to the letter titled “Application to enter Floater Road Reserve and construct an access point for water tanker and install culverts for borefield pipelines” and a letter dated 7 November 2017 from the Shire of Ravensthorpe. | 27/11/2017 | ||
Consent to mine on Floater Road granted. | 23/06/2018 | |||
41 | Within 3 years of the lessee completing operations or entering care and maintenance, the lessee will reinstate any portion of Floater Road it removes as a result of its mining operations within an alignment to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Resource and Environmental Compliance, DMIRS. | 07/09/2018 | ||
42 | A Mine Closure Plan is to be submitted in the Annual Environmental Reporting month specified in tenement conditions in the year specified below, unless otherwise directed by the Executive Director Resource and Environmental Compliance Division, Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety. The Mine Closure Plan is to be prepared in accordance with the Department’s “Guidelines for Preparing Mine Closure Plans”: | 27/08/2020 | ||
● | 2022 | |||
13/03/2019 | 26/08/2020 | |||
|
||||
43 | At closure the final tailings surface of the in-pit Tailings Storage Facility must not be less than 5m below, or less than 10m above natural ground water level at any point. | 19/07/2019 | ||
44 | Pit wall stability monitoring is to be undertaken on a regular basis and managed in accordance with trigger-action response plans (TARPS). TARPS are to be developed prior to commencing tailings deposition. | 19/07/2019 |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 28 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
# | CONDITIONS | Start Date | End Date |
45 | The Lessee to reinstall monitoring bores if impacted by the North West WRL expansion and add the re-installation details to the applicable TSF audit reports submitted to DMIRS. | 19/07/2019 | |
46 | At the time of decommissioning the TSF Cell 1 and prior to commencement of deposition of course rejects on the tailings surface, a further review report by a geotechnical or engineering specialist shall be submitted to DMIRS to verify that tailings are suitable as a foundation for the stockpile. This report should review the status of the TSF and its contained tailings, examine and address the implications of the physical and chemical characteristics of the materials, and present and review the results of all monitoring. | 19/07/2019 | |
47 | The construction details of the NW pit wall adjacent to the tailings storage facility embankment shall be documented by a geotechnical specialist and confirm the construction of satisfies the design intent. The construction document shall include the records of all excavation quality control, an assessment of the stability based on site specific conditions, and any modifications to the original design together with the reasons why the modifications were necessary. The construction document shall also present as-built drawings for the NW pit wall. A copy of the construction document shall be submitted to DMIRS for its records. | 17/06/2020 | |
48 | Pit wall stability monitoring adjacent to the in-pit tailings storage embankment is to be undertaken on a regular basis and managed in accordance with trigger-action response plans (TARPS). TARPS are to be developed prior to commencing tailings deposition. | 17/06/2020 | |
49 | All mining operations approved by a Mining Proposal submitted on or after 3 March 2020 to meet the environmental outcomes and performance criteria stated in the latest, relevant approved Mining Proposal/s. | 12/05/2022 | |
50 | All ground disturbance approved by a Mining Proposal submitted on or after 3 March 2020 to be undertaken within the disturbance envelope as presented within the latest, relevant approved Mining Proposal/s. | 12/05/2022 | |
51 | No alteration or expansion of mining operations beyond the activities described within the Activity, and Key Mine Activity tables of the latest, relevant approved Mining Proposal/s unless a subsequent Mining Proposal is submitted, in the form defined in section 70O of the Mining Act 1978, to cover the alteration or expansion, and until such Mining Proposal is approved by the Executive Director, Resource and Environmental Compliance Division, Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety. | 12/05/2022 | |
52 | The Lessee to ensure adequate environmental monitoring and analysis is undertaken of activities approved by a Mining Proposal submitted on or after 3 March 2020 to demonstrate the level of achievement of the performance criteria stated in the latest, relevant approved Mining Proposal/s. | 12/05/2022 | |
53 | Report any breach of environmental outcome or performance criteria contained within an approved Mining Proposal submitted on or after 3 March 2020, to the Executive Director, Resource and Environmental Compliance Division, Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety within 24 hours of becoming aware of the occurrence of the breach. | 12/05/2022 | |
54 | Management of mine closure to be undertaken in accordance with the latest, relevant, approved Mine Closure Plan. | 12/05/2022 | |
55 | Report any incident arising from mining activities that has caused, or has the potential to cause environmental harm or injury to the land, to the Executive Director, Resource and Environmental Compliance Division, Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety, within 24 hours of becoming aware of the occurrence of the incident. | 12/05/2022 | |
56 | The construction of the rockfill embankment for the 2SE in-pit TSF shall be supervised by an engineering or geotechnical specialist. | 12/05/2022 |
DEALINGS DETAILS |
Dealings
Encumbrances | ||
Bond Requirement 338899 | Requirement Date: | 20/01/2010 |
Amount: | $868,000.00 | |
RECORDED: | 13:31:02 20 January 2010 | |
FINALISED: | 10:19:21 02 February 2011 | |
Bond 347183 | Lodged: | 13:00 20 May 2010 |
Bond Type: | Unconditional Performance Bond | |
Bond Amount: | $868,000.00 | |
REJECTED: | 13:00 20 May 2010 |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 29 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
Bond 347303 | Lodged: | 10:50 24 May 2010 |
Bond Type: | Unconditional Performance Bond | |
Bond Amount: | $868,000.00 | |
RECORDED: | 24 May 2010 | |
RETIRED: | 11 June 2010 | |
Bond 348844 | Lodged: | 16:20 10 June 2010 |
Bond Type: | Unconditional Performance Bond | |
Bond Amount: | $868,000.00 | |
RECORDED: | 10 June 2010 | |
RETIRED: | 16 November 2010 | |
Caveat 355448 | Lodged: | 16:00 14 September 2010 |
Caveat Type: | Consent Caveat | |
Caveator: | BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | |
Shares Caveated: | 100/100 shares GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA | |
LIMITED | ||
RECORDED: | 16:00 14 September 2010 | |
WITHDRAWN: | 15:30 10 August 2011 | |
Mortgage 355449 | Lodged: | 16:00 14 September 2010 |
Mortgaged | 100/100 shares GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA | |
Shares: | LIMITED | |
Mortgagee: | BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | |
REGISTERED: | 16:00 14 September 2010 | |
Full Discharge: | 379207 Registered 15:30 10 August 2011 | |
DISCHARGED: | 15:30 10 August 2011 | |
Bond 359384 | Lodged: | 10:15 16 November 2010 |
Bond Type: | Unconditional Performance Bond | |
Bond Amount: | $878,000.00 | |
RECORDED: | 16 November 2010 | |
RETIRED: | 09 December 2010 | |
Application to Amend 360605 | Lodged: | 15:25 01 December 2010 |
Amending: | Address | |
From: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, C/- | |
HETHERINGTON EXPLORATION AND MINING | ||
TITLE SERVICES PTY LTD, PO BOX 2849, | ||
PERTH BUSINESS CENTRE, WA, 6849 | ||
To: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, C/- | |
HETHERINGTON EXPLORATION AND MINING | ||
TITLE SERVICES PTY LTD, PO BOX 8249, | ||
PERTH BUSINESS CENTRE, WA, 6849 | ||
RECORDED: | 15:25 01 December 2010 | |
Bond 360904 | Lodged: | 14:20 07 December 2010 |
Bond Type: | Unconditional Performance Bond | |
Bond Amount: | $903,000.00 | |
RECORDED: | 07 December 2010 | |
RETIRED: | 03 March 2011 | |
Application to Amend 363480 | Lodged: | 14:15 14 January 2011 |
Amending: | Address | |
From: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, C/- | |
HETHERINGTON EXPLORATION AND MINING | ||
TITLE SERVICES PTY LTD, PO BOX 8249, | ||
PERTH BUSINESS CENTRE, WA, 6849 | ||
To: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, C/- | |
CENTRAL TENEMENT SERVICES, PO BOX | ||
722, WEST PERTH, WA, 6872 | ||
RECORDED: | 14:15 14 January 2011 | |
Bond Requirement 364534 | Requirement Date: | 03/02/2011 |
Amount: | $903,000.00 |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 30 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
RECORDED: | 09:26:46 03 February 2011 | |
FINALISED: | 11:39:52 05 April 2011 | |
Bond 366759 | Lodged: | 12:50 02 March 2011 |
Bond Type: | Unconditional Performance Bond | |
Bond Amount: | $1,222,000.00 | |
RECORDED: | 02 March 2011 | |
RETIRED - MRF: | 12 August 2013 | |
Bond Requirement 368948 | Requirement Date: | 05/04/2011 |
Amount: | $1,222,000.00 | |
RECORDED: | 15:00:28 05 April 2011 | |
FINALISED: | 13:58:36 12 August 2013 | |
Withdrawal of Dealing 379031 | Lodged: | 15:30 10 August 2011 |
In respect to: | Caveat 355448 | |
RECORDED: | 15:30 10 August 2011 | |
Mortgage - Discharge 379207 | Lodged: | 15:30 10 August 2011 |
In respect to: | Mortgage 355449 | |
REGISTERED: | 15:30 10 August 2011 | |
Caveat 424699 | Lodged: | 14:05 06 June 2013 |
Caveat Type: | Absolute Caveat | |
Caveator: | DEUTSCHE BANK AG, SYDNEY | |
Shares Caveated: | 100/100 shares GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA | |
LIMITED | ||
RECORDED: | 14:05 06 June 2013 | |
Affected Dealing: | Mortgage 427980 | |
14 day notice sent: | 14 August 2013 | |
Order by Warden made for Caveat 424699 to remain in full force and | ||
effect on 27 August 2013. | ||
WITHDRAWN: | 14:50 14 January 2015 | |
Mortgage 424702 | Lodged: | 14:05 06 June 2013 |
Mortgaged | 100/100 shares GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA | |
Shares: | LIMITED | |
Mortgagee: | DEUTSCHE BANK AG, SYDNEY | |
REGISTERED: | 14:05 06 June 2013 | |
Full Discharge: | 460349 Registered 14:50 14 January 2015 | |
DISCHARGED: | 14:50 14 January 2015 | |
Application to Amend 426429 | Lodged: | 15:10 02 July 2013 |
Amending: | Address | |
From: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, C/- | |
CENTRAL TENEMENT SERVICES, PO BOX | ||
722, WEST PERTH, WA, 6872 | ||
To: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, C/- | |
MCMAHON MINING TITLE SERVICES PTY LTD, | ||
PO BOX 592, MAYLANDS, WA, 6931 | ||
RECORDED: | 15:10 02 July 2013 | |
Mortgage 427980 | Lodged: | 16:00 29 July 2013 |
Mortgaged | 100/100 shares GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA | |
Shares: | LIMITED | |
Mortgagee: | CLIPPER GROUP LIMITED | |
REGISTERED: | 10:00 27 August 2013 | |
DISCHARGED: | 10:20 25 November 2015 | |
Full Discharge: | 477868 Registered 10:20 25 November 2015 | |
Mortgage - Discharge 460349 | Lodged: | 14:50 14 January 2015 |
In respect to: | Mortgage 424702 | |
REGISTERED: | 14:50 14 January 2015 | |
Withdrawal of Dealing 460353 | Lodged: | 14:50 14 January 2015 |
In respect to: | Caveat 424699 |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 31 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
RECORDED: | 14:50 14 January 2015 | |
Mortgage - Discharge 477868 | Lodged: | 10:20 25 November 2015 |
In respect to: | Mortgage 427980 | |
REGISTERED: | 10:20 25 November 2015 | |
Mortgage 478797 | Lodged: | 15:10 10 December 2015 |
Mortgaged | 100/100 shares GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA | |
Shares: | LIMITED | |
Mortgagee: | MADISON PACIFIC TRUST LIMITED | |
REGISTERED: | 15:10 10 December 2015 | |
DISCHARGED: | 15:50 23 March 2017 | |
Full Discharge: | 503169 Registered 15:50 23 March 2017 | |
Extension of Time 481983 | Lodged: | 16:30 19 February 2016 |
Type: | Form 5 | |
RECORDED: | 16:30 19 February 2016 | |
APPROVED: | 16:23:18 23 February 2016 | |
Time extended to 20 Mar 2016 in respect to Form 5 for year ending | ||
2015 | ||
Forfeiture 485320 | Initiated: | 12/04/2016 for non-compliance with reporting |
requirements | ||
RECORDED: | 11:32:51 19 April 2016 | |
Notice Issued: | Regulation 50 Notice sent 12/04/2016 for non- | |
compliance with reporting requirements pursuant | ||
to Sec 115A. | ||
Compliance Date: | 12/05/2016 | |
WITHDRAWN: | 21 April 2016 (MER received same day letter | |
sent) | ||
Mortgage - Discharge 503169 | Lodged: | 15:50 23 March 2017 |
In respect to: | Mortgage 478797 | |
REGISTERED: | 15:50 23 March 2017 | |
Mortgage 503170 | Lodged: | 15:50 23 March 2017 |
Mortgaged | 100/100 shares GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA | |
Shares: | LIMITED | |
Mortgagee: | BNP PARIBAS | |
REGISTERED: | 15:50 23 March 2017 | |
DISCHARGED: | 14:15 01 May 2018 | |
Full Discharge: | 529060 Registered 14:15 01 May 2018 | |
Caveat 503171 | Lodged: | 15:50 23 March 2017 |
Caveat Type: | Consent Caveat | |
Caveator: | BNP PARIBAS | |
Shares Caveated: | 100/100 shares GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA | |
LIMITED | ||
RECORDED: | 15:50 23 March 2017 | |
WITHDRAWN: | 14:15 01 May 2018 | |
Forfeiture 507740 | Initiated: | 14/06/2017 for non-compliance with royalty |
provisions | ||
RECORDED: | 10:33:35 07 June 2017 | |
Notice Issued: | Regulation 50 Notice sent 14/06/2017 for non- | |
compliance with royalty provisions pursuant to | ||
Sec 82(1)(a). | ||
Compliance Date: | 19/07/2017 | |
FINALISED: | Order by Minister on 12 July 2017 that M 74/244 | |
be No Penalty Imposed | ||
Withdrawal of Dealing 529059 | Lodged: | 14:15 01 May 2018 |
In respect to: | Caveat 503171 | |
RECORDED: | 14:15 01 May 2018 | |
Mortgage - Discharge 529060 | Lodged: | 14:15 01 May 2018 |
In respect to: | Mortgage 503170 |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 32 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
REGISTERED: | 14:15 01 May 2018 | |
Mortgage 529062 | Lodged: | 14:15 01 May 2018 |
Mortgaged | 100/100 shares GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA | |
Shares: | LIMITED | |
Mortgagee: | BNP PARIBAS | |
REGISTERED: | 14:15 01 May 2018 | |
DISCHARGED: | 08:30 22 December 2022 | |
Full Discharge: | 666021 Registered 08:30 22 December 2022 | |
Caveat 529064 | Lodged: | 14:15 01 May 2018 |
Caveat Type: | Consent Caveat | |
Caveator: | BNP PARIBAS | |
Shares Caveated: | 100/100 shares GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA | |
LIMITED | ||
RECORDED: | 14:15 01 May 2018 | |
WITHDRAWN: | 08:30 22 December 2022 | |
Inclusion of Private Land 532632 | Lodged: | 16:04 11 June 2018 |
Amending the grant of this lease to include Lot 36 on Deposited Plan | ||
80856 and Lot 177 on Deposited Plan 141641 to a depth of 30 metres | ||
from the natural surface. | ||
RECORDED: | 16:04 11 June 2018 | |
GRANTED: | 26 June 2018 | |
Inclusion of Private Land 541828 | Lodged: | 08:30 10 August 2018 |
RECORDED: | 08:30 10 August 2018 | |
WITHDRAWN: | 10:04:57 02 November 2018 | |
Inclusion of Private Land 537136 | Lodged: | 09:58 14 August 2018 |
Amending the grant of this lease to include Lot 23 on Deposited Plan | ||
80826 and Lot 176 on Deposited Plan 141643 to a depth of 30 metres | ||
from the natural surface. | ||
RECORDED: | 09:58 14 August 2018 | |
GRANTED: | 22 August 2018 | |
Inclusion of Private Land 541977 | Lodged: | 09:32 02 November 2018 |
Amending the grant of this licence to include Lot 261 on deposited | ||
plan 146658 to a depth of 30 metres from the natural surface. | ||
RECORDED: | 09:32 02 November 2018 | |
GRANTED: | 07 November 2018 | |
Application to Amend 542897 | Lodged: | 15:30 16 November 2018 |
Amending: | Address (Including DTC Details) | |
From: | Principal Place of Business : GALAXY | |
LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, SAME AS | ||
CORRESPONDENCE and DTC :GALAXY | ||
LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, C/- MCMAHON | ||
MINING TITLE SERVICES PTY LTD, PO BOX | ||
592, MAYLANDS, WA, 6931 | ||
To: | Principal Place of Business : GALAXY LITHIUM | |
AUSTRALIA LIMITED, LEVEL 4, 21 KINTAIL | ||
ROAD, APPLECROSS, WA, 6153 and | ||
DTC :GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, | ||
MCMAHON MINING TITLE SERVICES PTY | ||
LTD, C/- MCMAHON MINING TITLE SERVICES | ||
PTY LTD, PO BOX 592, MAYLANDS, WA, 6931, | ||
xxxx@mmts.net.au, xxxxxxxxxxx997 | ||
RECORDED: | 15:30 16 November 2018 | |
Inclusion of Private Land 542981 | Lodged: | 10:23:49 19 November 2018 |
Amending the grant of this licence to include Lot 31 on Deposited | ||
Plan 224145 and Lot 127 on Deposited Plan 145763 to a depth of 30 | ||
metres from the natural surface. | ||
RECORDED: | 10:23:49 19 November 2018 | |
GRANTED: | 22 November 2018 | |
Inclusion of Private Land 543310 | Lodged: | 12:55:17 26 November 2018 |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 33 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
Amending the grant of this licence to include Lot 28 on Deposited Plan 224145, Lot 253 on Deposited Plan 401420 and Lot 254 on Deposited Plan 401421 to a depth of 30 metres from the natural |
||
surface. | ||
RECORDED: | 12:55:17 26 November 2018 | |
GRANTED: | 28 November 2018 | |
Inclusion of Private Land 549666 | Lodged: | 14:54:40 19 March 2019 |
Amending the grant of this lease to include Lot 251 on Deposited Plan 401418, Lot 318 on Deposited Plan 150052 and Lot 1433 on Deposited Plan 216162 to a depth of 30 metres from the natural |
||
surface. | ||
RECORDED: | 14:54:40 19 March 2019 | |
GRANTED: | 17 April 2019 | |
Inclusion of Private Land 549784 | Lodged: | 15:17:45 20 March 2019 |
Amending the grant of this lease to include Lot 50 and 51 on | ||
Deposited Plan 29986 to a depth of 30 metres from the natural | ||
surface. | ||
RECORDED: | 15:17:45 20 March 2019 | |
GRANTED: | 17 April 2019 | |
Inclusion of Private Land 555450 | Lodged: | 13:05:35 06 June 2019 |
RECORDED: | 13:05:35 06 June 2019 | |
WITHDRAWN: | 08:40:24 10 June 2019 | |
Forfeiture 584058 | Initiated: | 13/08/2020 for non-compliance with royalty |
provisions | ||
RECORDED: | 08:49 13 August 2020 | |
Notice Issued: | Regulation 50 Notice sent 13/08/2020 for non- | |
compliance with royalty provisions pursuant to | ||
Sec 82(1)(a). | ||
June 2020 Quarter | ||
Compliance Date: | 17/09/2020 | |
FINALISED: | Order by Minister on 21 September 2020 that M | |
74/244 be Penalty Imposed | ||
Fine 586685 | Fine in respect to: | Forfeiture Process 584058 |
Fine reason: | Non-compliance with Royalties obligations | |
Penalty amount: | $738.26 | |
Notification date: | 22/09/2020 | |
Due date: | 26/10/2020 | |
Pursuant to: | Section 97(5) | |
RECORDED: | 21 September 2020 | |
PAYMENT | 30 September 2020 | |
RECEIVED: | ||
FINALISED: | 30 September 2020 | |
Receipt Number: | 10165786 | |
Amount: | $738.26 | |
Remaining | $0.00 | |
balance: | ||
Application to Amend 650180 | Lodged: | 15:34:43 25 May 2022 |
Amending: | Address (Including DTC Details) | |
From: | Principal Place of Business : GALAXY LITHIUM | |
AUSTRALIA LIMITED, LEVEL 4, 21 KINTAIL | ||
ROAD, APPLECROSS, WA, 6153 and | ||
DTC :GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, | ||
MCMAHON MINING TITLE SERVICES PTY | ||
LTD, C/- MCMAHON MINING TITLE SERVICES | ||
PTY LTD, PO BOX 592, MAYLANDS, WA, 6931, | ||
xxxx@mmts.net.au, xxxxxxxxxxx997 | ||
To: | Principal Place of Business : GALAXY LITHIUM | |
AUSTRALIA LIMITED, LEVEL 1, 21 KINTAIL | ||
ROAD, APPLECROSS, WA, 6153 and | ||
DTC :GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 34 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
LEVEL 1, 21 KINTAIL ROAD, APPLECROSS, WA, 6153 |
||
RECORDED: | 15:34:43 25 May 2022 | |
Application to Amend 650184 | Lodged: | 15:41:27 25 May 2022 |
Amending: | ACN | |
From: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN: | |
To: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED | |
ACN:130182099 | ||
RECORDED: | 15:41:27 25 May 2022 | |
Application to Amend 651311 | Lodged: | 15:47:38 10 June 2022 |
Amending: | Address (Including DTC Details) | |
From: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, LEVEL 4, 21 KINTAIL ROAD, APPLECROSS, WA, 6153 |
|
To: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED, LEVEL 1, 21 KINTAIL ROAD, APPLECROSS, WA, 6153 |
|
RECORDED: | 15:47:38 10 June 2022 | |
Application to Amend 651313 | Lodged: | 15:50:47 10 June 2022 |
Amending: | Name | |
From: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA LIMITED | |
To: | GALAXY LITHIUM AUSTRALIA PTY LTD | |
RECORDED: | 15:50:47 10 June 2022 | |
Withdrawal of Dealing 666019 | Lodged: | 08:30 22 December 2022 |
In respect to: | Caveat 529064 | |
RECORDED: | 08:30 22 December 2022 | |
Mortgage - Discharge 666021 | Lodged: | 08:30 22 December 2022 |
In respect to: | Mortgage 529062 | |
REGISTERED: | 08:30 22 December 2022 |
RENT DETAILS |
Rent Payments
Type | Year | Receipt Date |
Payment No | Receipt No | MR Lodged |
Amount | Rental Area | Effective Date |
Amount Due |
Discrepancy |
Payment | 2023 | 15/12/2022 | 4426128692 | 10311492 | OL | $43,920.00 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $43,920.00 | $0.00 |
Payment | 2022 | 15/12/2021 | 6234040167 | 10235499 | OL | $40,260.00 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $40,260.00 | $0.00 |
Payment | 2021 | 24/12/2020 | 6820660089 | 10176847 | OL | $36,600.00 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $36,600.00 | $0.00 |
Payment | 2020 | 18/12/2019 | 2982949212 | 10127023 | OL | $36,234.00 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $36,234.00 | $0.00 |
Payment | 2019 | 17/12/2018 | 3926380159 | 10080148 | OL | $34,221.00 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $34,221.00 | $0.00 |
Payment | 2018 | 04/12/2017 | 2947113391 | MT210010911065EF | OL | $32,208.00 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $32,208.00 | $0.00 |
GALAXY | ||||||||||
LITHIUM A | ||||||||||
Payment | 2017 | 23/12/2016 | MT-210010847533- | OL | $31,201.50 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $31,201.50 | $0.00 | |
EF | ||||||||||
Payment | 2016 | 22/12/2015 | MT-210010462281- | OL | $30,195.00 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $30,195.00 | $0.00 | |
EF | ||||||||||
Refund | 2015 | 16/11/2015 | (REFUND) | PE | $32.20 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $29,463.00 | $0.00 | |
06-141685 | ||||||||||
Payment | 2015 | 24/12/2014 | 06-141685 | PE | $29,495.20 | |||||
Refund | 2014 | 16/11/2015 | (REFUND) | PE | $31.40 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $28,731.00 | $0.00 | |
06-131456 | ||||||||||
Payment | 2014 | 17/12/2013 | 06-131456 | PE | $28,762.40 | |||||
Refund | 2013 | 16/11/2015 | (REFUND) | PE | $30.80 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $28,182.00 | $0.00 | |
06-119552 | ||||||||||
Payment | 2013 | 17/01/2013 | 06-119552 | PE | $28,212.80 | |||||
Refund | 2012 | 16/11/2015 | (REFUND) | PE | $30.00 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $27,450.00 | $0.00 | |
06-104956 | ||||||||||
Payment | 2012 | 17/01/2012 | 06-104956 | PE | $27,480.00 |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 35 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
Type | Year | Receipt Date |
Payment No | Receipt No | MR Lodged |
Amount | Rental Area | Effective Date |
Amount Due |
Discrepancy |
Refund | 2011 | 16/11/2015 | (REFUND) | PE | $31.90 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $29,188.50 | $0.00 | |
88467 | ||||||||||
Payment | 2011 | 06/01/2011 | 88467 | PE | $29,220.40 | |||||
Refund | 2010 | 16/11/2015 | (REFUND) | PE | $31.24 | 1,830.00000 HA | 07/11/2012 | $28,584.60 | $0.00 | |
68138 | ||||||||||
Payment | 2010 | 04/12/2009 | 73130 | PE | $2,601.44 | |||||
Payment | 2010 | 07/08/2009 | 68138 | PE | $26,014.40 |
EXPENDITURE/EXEMPTION DETAILS |
Expenditure/Exemptions
Year | Minimum | Expenditure | Total | Exemption | Exemption | Exemption | Exemption | Outcome |
Expenditure | Lodged | Expenditure | Amount | Lodged | Number | Status | Date | |
2023 | $183,000.00 | |||||||
2022 | $183,000.00 | 08/02/2023 | $185,181,507.07 | |||||
2021 | $183,000.00 | 14/02/2022 | $114,399,937.00 | |||||
2020 | $183,000.00 | 15/02/2021 | $67,563,488.83 | |||||
2019 | $183,000.00 | 28/01/2020 | $93,102,013.00 | |||||
2018 | $183,000.00 | 12/02/2019 | $70,781,253.00 | |||||
2017 | $183,000.00 | 22/01/2018 | $24,580,771.00 | |||||
2016 | $183,000.00 | 16/02/2017 | $1,671,088.00 | |||||
2015 | $183,000.00 | 18/03/2016 | $1,475,861.00 | |||||
2014 | $183,000.00 | 17/02/2015 | $2,243,473.00 | |||||
2013 | $183,000.00 | 03/02/2014 | $7,378,206.00 | |||||
2012 | $183,184.00 | 08/02/2013 | $35,617,581.00 | |||||
2011 | $183,200.00 | 10/02/2012 | $61,370,687.00 | |||||
2010 | $183,200.00 | 09/02/2011 | $2,525,017.00 |
Expenditure Details
Year | Lodged | Exploration Activities |
Mining Activities |
Aboriginal Survey |
Rent/Rates | Admin. | Prospecting | Total Expenditure |
2022 | 08/02/2023 | $5,168,660.79 | $179,901,954.00 | $0.00 | $74,292.28 | $36,600.00 | $0.00 | $185,181,507.07 |
2021 | 14/02/2022 | $749,452.00 | $113,547,210.00 | $0.00 | $66,675.00 | $36,600.00 | $0.00 | $114,399,937.00 |
2020 | 15/02/2021 | $152,340.45 | $67,323,926.00 | $0.00 | $50,622.38 | $36,600.00 | $0.00 | $67,563,488.83 |
2019 | 28/01/2020 | $338,981.00 | $92,679,245.00 | $0.00 | $47,187.00 | $36,600.00 | $0.00 | $93,102,013.00 |
2018 | 12/02/2019 | $4,354,880.00 | $63,021,856.00 | $0.00 | $33,982.00 | $3,370,535.00 | $0.00 | $70,781,253.00 |
2017 | 22/01/2018 | $2,574,845.00 | $20,802,512.00 | $0.00 | $32,902.00 | $1,170,512.00 | $0.00 | $24,580,771.00 |
2016 | 16/02/2017 | $1,360,797.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $31,777.00 | $278,514.00 | $0.00 | $1,671,088.00 |
2015 | 18/03/2016 | $4,598.00 | $1,199,486.00 | $0.00 | $30,961.00 | $240,816.00 | $0.00 | $1,475,861.00 |
2014 | 17/02/2015 | $96,558.00 | $1,742,775.00 | $0.00 | $30,228.00 | $373,912.00 | $0.00 | $2,243,473.00 |
2013 | 03/02/2014 | $128,961.00 | $5,990,048.00 | $0.00 | $29,496.00 | $1,229,701.00 | $0.00 | $7,378,206.00 |
2012 | 08/02/2013 | $498,949.00 | $29,114,105.00 | $53,097.00 | $28,820.00 | $5,922,610.00 | $0.00 | $35,617,581.00 |
2011 | 10/02/2012 | $332,804.00 | $50,745,142.00 | $49,841.00 | $27,311.00 | $10,215,589.00 | $0.00 | $61,370,687.00 |
2010 | 09/02/2011 | $2,067,998.00 | $0.00 | $17,036.00 | $26,384.00 | $413,599.00 | $0.00 | $2,525,017.00 |
COMBINED REPORTING DETAILS |
C Number : | 127/2004 | Reporting Date : | 18/02 |
Project : | Mount Cattlin | Affecting | 18/12 - 17/12 |
Period : |
Active Tenements: | ||
E 74/379-I (06/06/2018) | E 74/399 (06/06/2018) | E 74/400-I (08/02/2011) |
E 74/401-I (08/02/2011) | E 74/406 (06/06/2018) | E 74/415 (08/04/2009) |
E 74/570 (28/08/2018) | E 74/571 (28/08/2018) | E 74/589 (28/08/2018) |
E 74/713 (12/05/2022) | G 74/13 (08/06/2023) | L 74/61 (02/08/2023) |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 36 of 37 |
MINING TENEMENT DETAILS REPORT | MINING LEASE 74/244 - Live |
Active Tenements: | ||
M 74/244 (09/03/2011) | P 74/370 (12/04/2017) | P 74/371 (12/04/2017) |
P 74/372 (22/03/2017) | P 74/373 (12/04/2017) |
End of Search |
Created 30/08/2023 03:31:25 | Requested By: Helen Symes/Page 37 of 37 |
•
|
the use in connection with the Registration Statement of, and references therein to, the technical report titled “Resource and
Reserve Report, Pre-Feasibility Study, Salar del Hombre Muerto, Argentina” (the “Technical Report Summary”), dated February 21, 2023, that was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and which is included as an exhibit to, and portions of which are summarized in Livent Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Form 10-K”), which Form 10-K is
incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement;
|
•
|
the use of and references to our name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC), in connection with the Registration
Statement; and
|
•
|
any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived, summarized, quoted or
referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by us, that is or are included or
incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
INTEGRAL CONSULTING INC.
|
||||
By: | /s/ William Cutler |
|||
Name: |
William Cutler, Ph.D., P.G.
|
|||
Title: |
Principal
|
•
|
the use in connection with the Registration Statement of the technical report titled “Technical Report on the Whabouchi Mine, Nemaska, Quebec” (the “Technical Report Summary”), dated
September 8, 2023, that was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and which is included as an exhibit to, and portions of which are summarized in,
Livent Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 25, 2023 (the “Form 8-K”), which Form 8-K is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement;
|
•
|
the use of and references to our name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC), in connection
with the Registration Statement; and
|
•
|
any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived,
summarized, quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified by us, that is or
are included or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
BBA INC.
|
||||
By: | /s/ Jeffrey Cassoff |
|||
Name: |
Jeffrey Cassoff |
|||
Title: |
Principal Mining Engineer
|
•
|
the use in connection with the Registration Statement of the technical report titled “Technical Report on the Whabouchi Mine, Nemaska, Quebec” (the “Technical Report Summary”), dated
September 8, 2023, that was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and which is included as an exhibit to, and portions of which are summarized in,
Livent Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 25, 2023 (the “Form 8-K”), which Form 8-K is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement;
|
•
|
the use of and references to our name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC), in connection
with the Registration Statement; and
|
•
|
any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived,
summarized, quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified by us, that is or
are included or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
DRA AMERICAS INC.
|
||||
By: | /s/ Daniel M. Gagnon |
|||
Name: |
Daniel M. Gagnon
|
|||
Title: |
VP Mining, Geology and GM Montréal office
|
•
|
the use in connection with the Registration Statement of the technical report titled “Technical Report on the Whabouchi Mine, Nemaska, Quebec” (the “Technical Report Summary”), dated
September 8, 2023, that was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and which is included as an exhibit to, and portions of which are summarized in,
Livent Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 25, 2023 (the “Form 8-K”), which Form 8-K is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement;
|
•
|
the use of and references to our name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC), in connection
with the Registration Statement; and
|
•
|
any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived,
summarized, quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified by us, that is or
are included or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
SGS GEOLOGICAL SERVICES
|
||||
By: | /s/ Marc-Antoine Laporte |
|||
Name: |
Marc-Antoine Laporte |
|||
Title: |
Global Business Manager |
(a)
|
I consent, in connection with Allkem Livent plc’s registration statement on Form S-4 and the proxy statement/prospectus included therein, including any amendments thereto (collectively, the “Registration
Statement”), to the use of the Technical Report Summary, that was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and which is included as an exhibit to,
and portions of which are summarized in, Livent Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated 25 September 2023 (the “Form 8-K”), which Form 8-K is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement;
|
(b)
|
I consent to the use of my name in the Registration Statement and to any quotation from or summarization in the Registration Statement, of the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am
responsible.
|
(c)
|
I am responsible for authoring, and this consent pertains to, Sections 1.15.2, 1.23.6, 1.23.7, 15.1.9, 15.1.10, 17.5, 17.6 and 23.7 of the Technical Report Summary. I further confirm that I have read the
Registration Statement, and that the descriptions and references to the Technical Report Summary in the Registration Statement fairly and accurately reflect, in the form and context in which they appear, the information in the parts of
the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible.
|
(a)
|
I consent, in connection with Allkem Livent plc’s registration statement on Form S-4 and the proxy statement/prospectus included therein, including any amendments thereto (collectively, the “Registration
Statement”), to the use of the Technical Report Summary, that was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and which is included as an exhibit to,
and portions of which are summarized in, Livent Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated 25 September 2023 (the “Form 8-K”), which Form 8-K is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement;
|
(b)
|
I consent to the use of my name in the Registration Statement and to any quotation from or summarization in the Registration Statement, of the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am
responsible.
|
(c)
|
I am responsible for authoring, and this consent pertains to, Sections 1.23.3, 12.4.2 and 23.4 of the Technical Report Summary. I further confirm that I have read the Registration Statement, and that the
descriptions and references to the Technical Report Summary in the Registration Statement fairly and accurately reflect, in the form and context in which they appear, the information in the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which
I am responsible.
|
1.
|
The filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary, Mt Cattlin ” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of 30 June 2023, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Registration
Statement;
|
2.
|
The use of and references to our name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Registration
Statement and the Technical Report Summary; and
|
3.
|
Any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced
from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by us, that is or are included or incorporated by
reference in the Registration Statement.
|
/s/ Peter Lock
|
|
Peter Lock |
|
Executive Director
Mining Plus Pty Ltd.
|
|
1.
|
The filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary, Mt Cattlin” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of June 30, 2023, as an exhibit to and referenced
in the Registration Statement;
|
2.
|
The use of and references to my name, including my status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Item 1300 (Definitions) of Regulations S-K 1300 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission), in connection with the Registration Statement and the Technical Report Summary; and
|
3.
|
Any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived, summarized,
quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by me, that I supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by me, that is or are included
or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
|
|
/s/ Albert Thamm F.Aus.lMM
|
|
Albert Thamm F.Aus.lMM
|
|
1.
|
The filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary, Olaroz Lithium Facility” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of June 30,
2023, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Registration Statement;
|
2.
|
The use of and references to our name, including my status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission), in connection with the Registration Statement and the Technical Report Summary; and
|
3.
|
Any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived, summarized,
quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by me, that I supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by me, that is or are included
or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
1
|
Executive Summary (partial)
|
2
|
Introduction
|
3
|
Project Property Description
|
4
|
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure, Physiography
|
5
|
History
|
6
|
Geological Setting and Mineralization and Deposit Types
|
7
|
Geological Setting and Mineralization and Deposit Types
|
8
|
Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security
|
9
|
Data Verification
|
11
|
Mineral Resource Estimates
|
12
|
Mineral Reserve Estimates (partial)
|
13
|
Mining Methods
|
17
|
Environmental Studies, Permitting, and Social or Community Impact
|
20
|
Adjacent Properties
|
21
|
Other Relevant Data and Information
|
22
|
Interpretation and Conclusions (partial)
|
23
|
Recommendations (partial)
|
24
|
References (partial)
|
25
|
Reliance on Information Supplied by Registrant (partial)
|
/s/ Murray Brooker
|
|
Murray Brooker
|
|
1.
|
The filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary, Olaroz Lithium Facility” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of June 30,
2023, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Registration Statement;
|
2.
|
The use of and references to my/our name, including my/our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission), in connection with the Registration Statement and the Technical Report Summary; and
|
3.
|
Any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived, summarized,
quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by me/us, that I/we supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by me/us, that is or are
included or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
1
|
Executive Summary (partial)
|
10
|
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
12
|
Mineral Reserve Estimates (partial)
|
14
|
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
15
|
Infrastructure
|
16
|
Market Studies
|
18
|
Capital and Operating Costs
|
19
|
Economic Analysis
|
22
|
Interpretation and Conclusions (partial)
|
23
|
Recommendations (partial)
|
24
|
References (partial)
|
25
|
Reliance on Information Supplied by Registrant (partial)
|
/s/ Michael Gunn
|
|
Michael Gunn
|
|
Gunn Metallurgy
|
|
1.
|
The filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary, Sal de Vida Lithium Brine Project” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of
June 30, 2023, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Registration Statement;
|
2.
|
The use of and references to our name, including our/my status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission), in connection with the Registration Statement and the Technical Report Summary; and
|
3.
|
Any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived, summarized,
quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by us, that is or are included
or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
1.
|
Chapter 1: Executive Summary (partial)
|
2.
|
Chapter 3: Property Description
|
3.
|
Chapter 4: Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure, Physiography
|
4.
|
Chapter 5: History
|
5.
|
Chapter 6: Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit Types
|
6.
|
Chapter 7: Exploration
|
7.
|
Chapter 8: Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security
|
8.
|
Chapter 9: Data Verification
|
9.
|
Chapter 11: Mineral Resource Estimates
|
10.
|
Chapter 12: Mineral Reserve Estimates
|
11.
|
Chapter 13: Mining Methods
|
12.
|
Chapter 17: Environmental Studies, Permitting, and Social or Community Impact
|
13.
|
Chapter 22: Interpretation and Conclusions (partial)
|
14.
|
Chapter 23: Recommendations (partial)
|
15.
|
Chapter 24: References (partial)
|
16.
|
Chapter 25: Reliance on Information Supplied by the Registrant (partial)
|
/s/ Michael Rosko
|
|
/s/ Brandon Schneider |
|
1.
|
The filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary, Sal de Vida Brine Project” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of June 30,
2023, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Registration Statement;
|
2.
|
The use of and references to my/our name, including my/our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission), in connection with the Registration Statement and the Technical Report Summary; and
|
3.
|
Any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived, summarized,
quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by me/us, that I/we supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by me/us, that is or are
included or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
1
|
Executive Summary (co-author)
|
2
|
Introduction (co-author)
|
10
|
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
14
|
Processing and Recovery Methods
|
15
|
Infrastructure
|
16
|
Market Studies
|
18
|
Capital and Operating Costs
|
19
|
Economic Analysis
|
20
|
Adjacent Properties
|
21
|
Other relevant data and information
|
22
|
Interpretation and Conclusions (co-author)
|
23
|
Recommendations (co-author)
|
24
|
References (co-author)
|
25
|
Reliance on Information Supplied by Registrant (co-author)
|
/s/ Michael Gunn
|
|
Michael Gunn
|
|
Gunn Metallurgy
|
|
1.
|
The filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary, Cauchari Lithium Brine Project” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of June
30, 2023, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Registration Statement;
|
2.
|
The use of and references to my name, including my status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission), in connection with the Registration Statement and the Technical Report Summary; and
|
3.
|
Any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived, summarized,
quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by me, that I supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by me, that is or are included
or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
/s/ Marek Dworzanowski
|
|
1.
|
The filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary, Cauchari Lithium Brine Project” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of June
30, 2023, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Registration Statement;
|
2.
|
The use of and references to my name, including my status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission), in connection with the Registration Statement and the Technical Report Summary; and
|
3.
|
Any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived, summarized,
quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by me, that I supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by me, that is or are included
or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
1
|
Summary (co-author)
|
2
|
Introduction
|
3
|
Property Description and Location
|
4
|
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
5
|
History
|
6
|
Geological Setting and Mineralization
|
7
|
Exploration
|
8
|
Sample preparation
|
9
|
Verification
|
11
|
Mineral resources
|
12
|
Mineral reserves
|
13
|
Mining methods
|
20
|
Adjacent properties
|
22
|
Interpretation and conclusions (co-author)
|
23
|
Recommendations (co-author)
|
24
|
References (co-author)
|
Frederik Reidel |
|
Frederik Reidel
|
|
SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd.
55 University Ave., Suite 501, Toronto, ON M5J 2H7
|
![]() |
|
|
1
|
The filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary James Bay Lithium Project” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective
date of June 30, 2023, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Registration Statement;
|
2
|
The use of and references to our name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Registration Statement and the Technical Report Summary; and
|
3
|
Any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information
derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by us,
that is or are included or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement.
|
CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON
|
![]() |
|
QV1- Level 3, 250 St Georges Tce, Perth
Western Australia 6000 PO Box 7085, Cloisters Square Western Australia 6850 T / +61 (0)8 9204 0700 |
RE: |
SEC TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY, JAMES BAY LITHIUM PROJECT
|
1.
|
The filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary, James Bay Lithium Project” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date 30th of June 2023, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Registration Statement;
|
2.
|
The use of and references to our name, including our status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Registration
Statement and the Technical Report Summary; and
|
3.
|
Any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the Technical Report
Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by me, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by us, that is or are included or incorporated by reference in the
Registration Statement.
|
- Section 1.6
|
Executive Summary; Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
- Section 1.9
|
Executive Summary; Recovery Methods
|
- Section 1.10
|
Executive Summary; Project Infrastructure
|
- Section 1.13
|
Executive Summary; Capital and Operating Costs
|
- Section 1.15.4
|
Executive Summary; Recommendations; Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
- Section 4
|
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
|
- Section 10
|
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
- Section 14
|
Processing and recovery Methods
|
- Section 15.1
|
Infrastructure; General Site Plan
|
- Section 15.5
|
Infrastructure; Fresh Water and Potable Water
|
- Section 15.6
|
Infrastructure; Roads
|
- Section 15.7
|
Infrastructure; Earthworks and Buried Services
|
- Section 15.8
|
Infrastructure; Power and Control
|
- Section 15.9
|
Infrastructure; Communications (including IT / IS Interfaces)
|
- Section 15.10
|
Infrastructure; Fuel and Propane Supply
|
- Section 15.11
|
Infrastructure; Waste Disposal (Industrial and Camp)
|
- Section 15.12
|
Infrastructure; Sewage
|
- Section 15.13
|
Infrastructure; Fire Protection
|
- Section 15.14
|
Infrastructure; Security
|
![]() |
|
|
QV1- Level 3, 250 St Georges Tce, Perth
Western Australia 6000 PO Box 7085, Cloisters Square Western Australia 6850 T / +61 (0)8 9204 0700 |
- Section 15.15
|
Infrastructure; Accommodations
|
- Section 15.16
|
Infrastructure; Product Warehousing
|
- Section 15.17
|
Infrastructure; Mining Infrastructure
|
- Section 15.18
|
Infrastructure; Process Plant Building
|
- Section 15.19
|
Infrastructure; Existing Infrastructure
|
- Section 18
|
Capital and Operating Costs (excluding 18.3.1)
|
- Section 21
|
Other Relevant Data
|
- Section 22.1.3
|
-Interpretation and Conclusions; Mineral Processing and Metallurgy
|
- Section 22.2.2
|
Project Risks; Processing
|
- Section 22.2.4
|
Interpretation and Conclusions; Project Execution
|
- Section 22.2.5
|
Interpretation and Conclusions; COVID 19
|
- Section 23.4
|
Recommendations; Processing and Metallurgical Testing
|
/s/ Robin Macaskill |
|
Robin Macaskill / Director, COO |
|
1. |
The filing and use of the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary James Bay Lithium Project” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of June 30, 2023, as an exhibit to and referenced in the
Registration Statement;
|
2. |
The use of and references to our name, including our/my status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Registration
Statement and the Technical Report Summary; and
|
3. |
Any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report Summary included in or incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement and the use of any information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the Technical Report
Summary, or portions thereof, that was or were prepared by us, that we supervised the preparation of and/or that was or were reviewed and approved or certified to by us, that is or are included or incorporated by reference in the Registration
Statement.
|
1. |
Section 1.10 – Project Infrastructure
|
2. |
Section 1.12 – Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
3. |
Section 1.15.3 – Mine Waste and Water Management
|
4. |
Section 1.15.5 – Environment
|
5. |
Section 15.2 – Waste Rock and Tailings Storage Facility (WRTSF)
|
6. |
Section 15.3 – Overburden and Peat Storage Facility (OPSF)
|
7. |
Section 15.4 – Clean Water Diversion and Contact Water Management
|
8. |
Section 17 – Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact
|
9. |
Section 22.2.3 – Waste Rocks and Tailings
|
10. |
Section 23.3 – Mine Waste and Water Management
|
11. |
Section 23.5 – Environment
|
Exhibit 96.1
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt Cattlin Lithium Project
Prepared by:
Mining Plus Pty Ltd.
Bravo Building, 1 George Wienke Drive, Perth Domestic Airport, WA 6105
and
Albert Thamm, F.Aus.IMM
of Allkem Limited
Prepared for:
Allkem Limited
Riparian Plaza—Level 35
71 Eagle Street
Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia
Report Date: August 31, 2023
Effective Date: June 30, 2023
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Contents
List of Tables | 14 |
List of Figures | 17 |
1. Executive Summary | 20 |
1.1 Introduction | 20 |
1.2 Property Description, Mineral Rights and Ownership | 20 |
1.3 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resource, Infrastructure and Physiography | 22 |
1.4 History | 22 |
1.5 Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit | 24 |
1.6 Exploration | 25 |
1.7 Drilling | 26 |
1.8 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security | 27 |
1.9 Data Verification | 28 |
1.10 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing | 28 |
1.11 Mineral Resource Estimate | 29 |
1.12 Mineral Reserves Estimate | 30 |
1.13 Mining Method | 32 |
1.14 Processing and Recovery Methods | 33 |
1.15 Infrastructure | 34 |
1.16 Market Studies & Contracts | 35 |
1.17 Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social Community impact, Negotiations, Contracts with Local Communities and Groups | 35 |
1.17.1 Environmental Studies and Permits | 35 |
1.17.2 Land Disturbance | 37 |
1.17.3 Dust, Noise and Blast Vibrations | 38 |
1.17.4 Stakeholders and Community Engagement | 38 |
1.18 Capital and Operating Costs | 39 |
1.18.1 Capital Costs | 39 |
1.18.2 Operating Costs | 40 |
1.19 Economic Analysis | 41 |
1.20 Adjacent Properties | 43 |
1.21 Interpretations and Conclusions | 44 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
5.2 Ownership History | 66 |
5.3 Mining History of the Area | 67 |
5.4 Historical Mineral Resource Estimates | 69 |
5.5 Historical Mineral Reserve Estimates | 71 |
6. Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit | 73 |
6.1 Regional Geology | 73 |
6.2 Local and Property Geology | 74 |
6.3 Deposit Type | 77 |
6.4 Mineralization | 79 |
6.5 Alteration | 81 |
6.5.1 Symplectic / Graphic Textured Alteration | 81 |
6.5.2 Pseudomorphic alteration | 81 |
6.6 Geometallurgical Model | 82 |
7. Exploration | 86 |
7.1 Exploration Work | 86 |
7.2 Geological Exploration and Drilling | 86 |
7.2.1 Geological Exploratory Work | 86 |
7.2.2 Geological Drilling | 96 |
7.3 Hydrological Drilling and Sampling | 106 |
7.4 Geotechnical Drilling | 106 |
7.5 Survey Grid Details | 109 |
7.6 Drillhole Collar Surveys | 109 |
7.6.1 Prior to 2016 – Phase 1 | 109 |
7.6.2 Post 2016 – Phase 2 | 109 |
7.7 Downhole Surveys | 110 |
7.7.1 Prior to 2016 – Phase 1 | 110 |
7.7.2 Post 2016 – Phase 2 | 110 |
7.8 Drillhole Data and Database | 111 |
7.8.1 Drillhole database | 111 |
8. Sample Preparation, Analyses And Security | 112 |
8.1 On-site Sample Preparation Methods and Security | 112 |
8.1.1 Phase 1 – Sampling Methods and Approach | 112 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
8.1.2 Phase 2 – Sampling Methods and Approach | 113 |
8.2 Laboratory Sample Preparation and Analytical Methods | 114 |
8.2.1 Phase 1 – Sample Preparation | 114 |
8.2.2 Phase 1 – Analytical Methods | 115 |
8.2.3 Phase 2 – Sample Preparation and Analytical Methods | 115 |
8.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Procedures | 117 |
8.3.1 Phase 1 QAQC Procedures | 117 |
8.3.2 Phase 2 and later QAQC Procedures | 117 |
8.3.3 Certified Reference Materials | 118 |
8.3.4 CRM Standard Transcription Errors | 119 |
8.3.5 Nagrom Li2O Results | 119 |
8.3.6 Nagrom Ta2O5 Results | 119 |
8.3.7 Intertek Li2O Results | 119 |
8.3.8 Intertek Ta2O5 Results | 119 |
8.3.9 SGS Li2O Results – pre-2022 | 120 |
8.3.10 SGS Ta2O5 Results | 120 |
8.4 Field Duplicates | 120 |
8.4.1 Field Duplicates – RC | 120 |
8.4.2 Field Duplicates – DD | 120 |
8.5 Field Blanks | 121 |
8.6 Bulk Density Determinations | 121 |
8.6.1 Site Bulk Density Determinations | 121 |
8.6.2 Nagrom Bulk Density Determinations | 122 |
8.7 Adequacy of Sample Preparation and Analytical Procedures | 122 |
9. Data Verification | 124 |
9.1 Data Verification Procedures Used by the Qualified Person. | 124 |
9.1.1 Geological Data Review | 124 |
9.1.2 Adequacy of the Data Used for the Purpose of the Technical Report Summary | 126 |
10. Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing | 127 |
10.1 Processing Plant | 127 |
10.2 Plant Optimization Projects | 127 |
10.2.1 Yield Optimization Project | 127 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
10.2.2 Recovery Improvement Project | 128 |
10.2.3 Optical Sorting | 129 |
10.3 Recovery Forecasts and NW Pit Metallurgical Test work | 130 |
10.3.1 NW Pit HLS Test Work | 132 |
10.3.2 Tailings Recovery Test Work | 136 |
10.3.3 Summary of Metallurgical Testwork and Recovery Forecasts | 137 |
11. Mineral Resource Estimates | 138 |
11.1 Key Assumptions, Parameters, and Methods | 138 |
11.1.1 Drillhole Data | 138 |
11.1.2 Interpretation and Modelling | 139 |
11.1.3 Block Model and Grade Estimation | 145 |
11.1.4 Block Model Validation | 147 |
11.2 Mineral Resource Classification | 152 |
11.3 Depletion | 153 |
11.4 Basis for Establishing the Reasonable Prospects of Eventual Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources | 153 |
11.4.1 Cut-off Grade | 154 |
11.5 Mineral Resources Statement | 154 |
11.6 Mineral Resource Uncertainty Discussion | 156 |
11.7 Factors that are Likely to Influence the Reasonable Prospect of Eventual Economic Extraction | 156 |
12. Mineral Reserves Estimates | 157 |
12.1 Summary and Mineral Reserve | 157 |
12.2 Geology and Mineral Resources | 158 |
12.3 Evaluation Factors | 159 |
12.3.1 Evaluation Models | 159 |
12.3.2 Cut-Off Grades | 159 |
12.3.3 Depletion | 160 |
12.3.4 Revenue Factors | 160 |
12.3.5 Mining Factors | 161 |
12.3.6 Geotechnical Factors | 161 |
12.3.7 Mining Dilution and Ore Loss | 161 |
12.3.8 Cost Factors | 163 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
12.3.9 Metallurgical Factors | 165 |
12.4 Optimization Results | 166 |
12.5 Pit Design | 168 |
12.6 Stockpiles | 169 |
12.6.1 Run of Mine Stockpiles | 170 |
12.6.2 Fine Grained Stockpiles | 170 |
12.6.3 Low Grade Stockpile | 171 |
12.6.4 Pre-2018 Tailings | 171 |
12.7 Mineral Reserve Estimate | 171 |
12.7.1 Comparison to Previous Estimates | 171 |
12.8 Risk Factors that could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimates | 173 |
12.9 Recommendations | 174 |
13. Mining Methods | 176 |
13.1 Current Mining Methodology | 176 |
13.2 Mining Equipment and Current Operation | 176 |
13.3 Mine Services and Infrastructure | 177 |
13.4 Mine Design | 178 |
13.4.1 Geotechnical | 178 |
13.4.2 Hydrological | 193 |
13.4.3 Haul Road Parameters | 193 |
13.4.4 Pit Design | 194 |
13.4.5 Waste Rock Disposal | 198 |
13.5 Mine Scheduling | 199 |
14. Processing and Recovery Methods | 203 |
14.1 Process Development | 203 |
14.1.1 Early Operations (2010-2016) | 203 |
14.1.2 Operations (2016-2018) | 203 |
14.1.3 Yield Optimization Project (2018–Present) | 204 |
14.2 Detailed Process Description | 204 |
14.2.1 ROM Pad and Crushing Circuit | 204 |
14.2.2 Wet Plant Feed Classification | 205 |
14.2.3 Fines Circuit | 206 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
14.2.4 Ultrafines Circuit | 206 |
14.2.5 DMS Plant | 206 |
14.2.6 Re-liberation Circuit | 207 |
14.2.7 Product Handling | 207 |
14.3 Tailings and Utilities | 208 |
14.4 Process Water and Power | 208 |
14.5 Metallurgical Accounting and Sample Processing | 208 |
14.6 Processing Workforce | 209 |
14.7 Processing Recommendations | 210 |
15. Infrastructure | 211 |
15.1 Infrastructure Layout | 211 |
15.2 Roads | 212 |
15.2.1 Site Access Roads | 212 |
15.2.2 Internal Site Roads | 212 |
15.3 Concentrate Transport Route | 212 |
15.4 Rail | 213 |
15.5 Processing Plant | 213 |
15.6 Water Services | 213 |
15.7 Power Supply and Reticulation | 213 |
15.7.1 Power Supply | 213 |
15.7.2 Switchboard | 214 |
15.7.3 Powerline Reticulation | 214 |
15.7.4 Solar Panels | 214 |
15.8 Mine Services and Administration | 214 |
15.8.1 Mining and Heavy Vehicles | 214 |
15.8.2 Mine Administration Building | 215 |
15.8.3 Other Ancillary Buildings | 215 |
15.9 Hydrocarbons | 215 |
15.9.1 Diesel Off-Loading | 215 |
15.9.2 Storage and Reticulation | 215 |
15.10 Explosives Storage | 215 |
15.11 Light Vehicles | 216 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
15.12 Security | 216 |
15.13 Technology and Communications | 216 |
15.14 Waste Management | 217 |
15.14.1 Sewage | 217 |
15.14.2 Solid Waste | 217 |
15.15 Topsoil Stockpiles for Rehabilitation | 217 |
15.16 Tailings Storage Facilities | 217 |
15.16.1 Above Ground Tailings Facility | 218 |
15.16.2 Stage 2 SW Pit In Pit Tailings Facility | 219 |
15.16.3 Current Tailings Storage Facility 2 SE Pit In Pit Tailings Storage Facility | 221 |
15.16.4 Future Tailings Storage Facility | 222 |
16. Market Studies and Contracts | 223 |
16.1 Overview of the Lithium Industry | 223 |
16.2 Sources of Lithium | 223 |
16.2.1 Lithium Minerals | 223 |
16.2.2 Lithium Clays | 224 |
16.2.3 Lithium Brines | 224 |
16.3 Lithium Industry Supply Chain | 224 |
16.4 Global Demand for Lithium | 225 |
16.5 Global Supply of Lithium | 227 |
16.6 Market Balance | 229 |
16.7 Lithium Prices | 229 |
16.7.1 Lithium Carbonate | 230 |
16.7.2 Lithium Hydroxide | 230 |
16.7.3 Chemical Grade Spodumene Concentrate | 231 |
16.8 Mt Cattlin Offtake | 232 |
16.9 Disclaimer | 232 |
17. Environmental Studies, Permitting, Social or Community Impacts | 233 |
17.1 Results of Environmental Studies | 233 |
17.1.1 Climate | 233 |
17.1.2 Landscape | 234 |
17.1.3 Materials Characteristics | 234 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
17.1.4 Biodiversity | 237 |
17.1.5 Hydrology | 239 |
17.1.6 Environmental Threats | 239 |
17.2 Heritage | 242 |
17.3 Environmental Management System | 243 |
17.4 Site Hydrology and Hydrogeology Introduction | 244 |
17.4.1 Climate | 245 |
17.4.2 Topography and Catchment | 247 |
17.5 Hydrology | 248 |
17.5.1 Surface Drainage | 249 |
17.6 Hydrogeology | 253 |
17.6.1 Aquifers | 253 |
17.6.2 Recharge and Discharge | 253 |
17.6.3 Groundwater Levels | 254 |
17.6.4 Groundwater Quality | 255 |
17.7 Impacts of Mining | 257 |
17.7.1 Surface Water | 257 |
17.7.2 Groundwater | 257 |
17.8 Overall Site Water Balance | 259 |
17.9 Stakeholder Engagement | 260 |
17.9.1 Key Stakeholders | 260 |
17.9.2 Stakeholder Engagement Strategy | 260 |
17.10 Public Consultation | 261 |
17.10.1 Community Consultative Group | 262 |
17.11 Environmental Permit Requirements | 263 |
17.11.1 Environmental Legislative Framework | 263 |
17.11.2 Mining proposals | 263 |
17.11.3 Mine Closure Plan | 264 |
17.11.4 Prescribed Premises License | 264 |
17.11.5 Future Permits | 264 |
17.12 Land Disturbance | 265 |
17.13 Waste Rock Landforms | 266 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
23.9.2 Village Accommodation | 303 |
23.10 Mining | 303 |
23.11 Economic Modelling | 303 |
24. References | 304 |
25. Reliance on Information Provided by the Registrant | 306 |
26. Signature Page | 307 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
List of Tables
Table 1-1 – Concentrate Production by year | 23 |
Table 1-2 – Summary drillhole data within the resource extents | 26 |
Table 1-3 – Summary drillhole data for all Mt Cattlin tenements | 26 |
Table 1-4 – Galaxy Phase 2 QC policies by year pre-2022 | 27 |
Table 1-5 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource as of 30 June 2023, COG >= 0.3% Li2O | 30 |
Table 1-6 – 2023 Ore Reserve Update. Effective Date June 30, 2023 | 31 |
Table 1-7 – Mt Cattlin permits and key legislation | 36 |
Table 1-8 – Identified Key Stakeholders and their Interest in the Project | 38 |
Table 1-9 – Life of mine capital expenditure summary | 39 |
Table 1-10 – Key processing cost assumptions | 40 |
Table 1-11 – Pricing forecast by year | 41 |
Table 1-12 – Summary of economic analysis | 42 |
Table 1-13 – Summary of annual cashflows | 43 |
Table 2-1 – Lists the individuals who acted as Qualified Persons (QPs) in preparing this Report | 47 |
Table 2-2 – ASX Reports | 48 |
Table 2-3 – Units of Measure | 49 |
Table 2-4 – Chemicals, elements, and associated abbreviations | 50 |
Table 2-5 – Acronyms and Abbreviations | 50 |
Table 3-1 – Tenement titles including area and expiry dates | 54 |
Table 5-1 – Spodumene concentrate production from 2010 to 2020 | 68 |
Table 5-2 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource, Hellman & Schofield (December 2007) | 69 |
Table 5-3 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource, Hellman & Schofield (December 2009) | 69 |
Table 5-4 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource, Mining Plus (December 2017) | 70 |
Table 5-5 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource, Mining Plus (June 2018) | 70 |
Table 5-6 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource, Mining Plus (December 2018) | 71 |
Table 5-7 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Reserve (August 2009) | 71 |
Table 5-8 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Reserve (March 2010) | 71 |
Table 5-9 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Reserve, Mining Plus (December 2017) | 72 |
Table 7-1 – Details on drilling database data within the resource export extents | 98 |
Table 7-2 – Details for other Exploration drilling external to the resource export extents | 100 |
Table 7-3 – Summary of the dedicated geotechnical diamond drill holes used for the project | 107 |
Table 7-4 – Summary drillhole data within the resource extents | 111 |
Table 7-5 – Summary drillhole data for all Mt Cattlin tenements | 111 |
Table 8-1 – Galaxy Phase 2 QC policies by year pre-2022 | 117 |
Table 8-2 – Galaxy QA-QC by year -2022/33 | 117 |
Table 8-3 – Galaxy QA-QC CRM 2022-3 | 118 |
Table 8-4 – Bulk density details by regolith and lithology | 122 |
Table 9-1 – NW Area collar resurvey results | 125 |
Table 9-2 – Drillhole assay audit results | 125 |
Table 9-3 – Drillhole downhole survey audit results | 125 |
Table 9-4 – Drillhole geological logging audit results | 126 |
Table 10-1 – Mt Cattlin Spodumene Concentrate Production and Recovery Data | 127 |
Table 10-2 – Feedstock and Plant Samples – HLS and DMS Results | 129 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Table 10-3 – Crushing Ore Sorter Design Basis | 130 |
Table 10-4 – NW Pit HLS Results Summary (2.9 SG) | 133 |
Table 10-5 – 2022 Metallurgical Samples and Hole Identifiers | 133 |
Table 10-6 – NW Stage 4 HLS Results | 134 |
Table 10-7 – HydroFloat Results, Mt Cattlin Tailings | 137 |
Table 11-1 – NW and SW Area drillhole details | 138 |
Table 11-2 – Comparison statistics between raw and composite samples for the Li2O estimation domains | 142 |
Table 11-3 – Comparison statistics between raw and composite samples for the Ta2O5 estimation domains | 142 |
Table 11-4 – Comparison statistics between raw and composite samples for the Fe2O3 estimation domains | 143 |
Table 11-5 – Summary statistics for the Li2O estimation domains | 144 |
Table 11-6 – Block model construction parameters | 145 |
Table 11-7 – NW and SW Area estimation parameters | 146 |
Table 11-8 – Summary of bulk density data by geology and weathering domain | 147 |
Table 11-9 – NW and SW Area block model Li2O global validation statistics, by estimation domain | 149 |
Table 11-10 – NW and SW Area block model Ta2O5 global validation statistics, by estimation domain | 149 |
Table 11-11 – NW and SW Area block model Fe2O3 global validation statistics, by estimation domain | 150 |
Table 11-12 – Grades assigned to un-estimated blocks, by element and domain | 152 |
Table 11-13 – Resource classification criteria | 152 |
Table 11-14 – Optimization Parameters used | 154 |
Table 11-15 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource as of 30 June 2023, COG >=0.3% Li2O | 154 |
Table 12-1 – 2023 Mineral Reserve Update (Allkem, 2023) | 158 |
Table 12-2 – Theoretical Economic Cut-Off Grade Calculation | 159 |
Table 12-3 – Product pricing | 160 |
Table 12-4 – Contractor Mining Costs | 163 |
Table 12-5 – Processing Costs | 164 |
Table 12-6 – Post Processing Costs | 164 |
Table 12-7 – Process Rates and Recoveries | 165 |
Table 12-8 – Optimization Shell Summary | 168 |
Table 12-9 – Stockpile Summary at End of June 2023 | 170 |
Table 12-10 – ROM Stockpile Balance 30 June 2023 | 170 |
Table 12-11 – Mineral Reserve Estimate June 2023 | 171 |
Table 12-12 – June 2022 Mineral Reserve Estimate (Allkem), 30 June 2022 | 172 |
Table 12-13 – Comparison between 30 June 2023 and 30 June 2022 ORE | 172 |
Table 12-14 – Relative comparison between 30 June 2023 and 30 June 2022 ORE | 172 |
Table 13-1 – Load and Haul Equipment Fleet | 177 |
Table 13-2 – Summary of the dedicated geotechnical diamond drill holes used for the project | 179 |
Table 13-3 – Major Rock Types | 180 |
Table 13-4 – Summary of the ‘likely’ and ‘lower bound’ geotechnical input parameters for slope stability analysis | 186 |
Table 13-5 – Typical design Factor of Safety (FoS) and Probability of Failure (PoF) acceptance criteria for open pit mining (Read and Stacey, 2009) | 186 |
Table 13-6 – Summary of Stability Analysis Results | 190 |
Table 13-7 – Slope Design Parameter Recommendations for Mt Cattlin NW Stage 4 | 192 |
Table 13-8 – Haul Road Parameters | 193 |
Table 13-9 – Stage 3 Inventory as of 30 June 2023 | 194 |
Table 13-10 – Stage 4-1 Inventory and Whittle Shell. Values include Stage 3 below June Topography | 195 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Table 13-11 – Stage 4-2 Inventory and Whittle Shell. Values include Stage 4-1 and Stage 3 below June Topography | 197 |
Table 13-12 – Waste Dumping Constraints | 199 |
Table 13-13 – Tomra Beneficiation and Mill Feed (incl. ROM Stocks) | 202 |
Table 14-1 – Water Usage and Power Consumption per Period | 208 |
Table 15-1 – SW IPTSF Deposition Sequence | 220 |
Table 17-1 – Average Rainfall and Dam Evaporation (Ravensthorpe), mm | 246 |
Table 17-2 – Identified Key Stakeholders and their Interest in the Project | 260 |
Table 17-3 – Mt Cattlin Permits and Key Legislation | 263 |
Table 18-1 – Life of Mine Capital Expenditure Summary | 273 |
Table 18-2 – Site Capital Expenditure | 274 |
Table 18-3 – Sustaining Capital Expenditure | 275 |
Table 18-4 – Total Mining Capital Cost | 275 |
Table 18-5 – Key Operating Cost Assumptions | 276 |
Table 18-6 – LOM Operating Costs by Mining Stage | 276 |
Table 18-7 – Mining Operating Cost by Deposit | 278 |
Table 18-8 – Load and Haul Cost by Deposit | 279 |
Table 18-9 – Drill and Blast Cost by Deposit | 279 |
Table 19-1 – Forward Estimates for Concentrate Price and Foreign Exchange | 282 |
Table 19-2 – Project Cashflow by Stages | 285 |
Table 19-3 – Annual Cashflows represented in US$m | 286 |
Table 19-4 – Cashflow Sensitivity (US$m) | 287 |
Table 19-5 – NPV Sensitivity (US$M) | 288 |
Table 19-6 – Relative changes to pretax cashflows with % changes to key inputs | 289 |
Table 19-7 – Comparative Risk Metrics – Stage vs. Overall | 289 |
Table 19-8 – Key Financial Results | 289 |
Table 25-1 – Expert Contributors | 306 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
List of Figures
Figure 1-1 – Location map of Mt Cattlin | 21 |
Figure 1-2 – Mt Cattlin Corporate Ownership Structure | 23 |
Figure 1-3 – Location of granted exploration licenses, prospecting licenses, and mining leases in the Ravensthorpe area | 25 |
Figure 1-4 – Proposed pit staging | 32 |
Figure 1-5 – Proposed plant feed sent to the mill based on initial production plan | 33 |
Figure 1-6 – Chemical-grade Spodumene Price Outlook, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mackenzie) | 35 |
Figure 1-7 – Annual expenditure by year | 41 |
Figure 3-1 – Location map of Mt Cattlin | 53 |
Figure 3-2 – Location of granted exploration licenses, prospecting licenses, and mining leases in the Ravensthorpe area | 55 |
Figure 3-3 – Location of granted exploration licenses, prospecting licenses, and mining leases in the Ravensthorpe area | 56 |
Figure 3-4 – Mt Cattlin and the Town of Ravensthorpe | 58 |
Figure 3-5 – Site organizational structure | 60 |
Figure 4-1 – Mt Cattlin location map | 64 |
Figure 5-1 – Mt Cattlin Corporate Ownership Structure | 66 |
Figure 6-1 – Geological plan showing the location and geological setting of the Mt Cattlin Deposit | 73 |
Figure 6-2 – Mt Cattlin local interpreted surface geology map showing lithology sequences and the spatial extent of the lithium resource (compiled M. Grigson, ARC Minerals) | 75 |
Figure 6-3 – Mt Cattlin Stratigraphic Column | 76 |
Figure 6-4 – Cross-section showing deeper NW zone pegmatite horizon | 77 |
Figure 6-5 – Perspective view looking NE and Cross-section showing deeper NW zone pegmatite horizon | 77 |
Figure 6-6 – Chemical evolution through a lithium-rich pegmatite group with distance from granitic source intrusion (London, 2008) | 78 |
Figure 6-7 – Mt Cattlin Pit 1A north wall showing pegmatite and quartz tourmaline veins | 79 |
Figure 6-8 – Spodumene crystals in pegmatite (arrowed), Mt Cattlin Pit 1A north wall | 80 |
Figure 6-9 – Alteration of light green spodumene to a dark green mineral on the margins of a vein composed predominantly of prehnite (Drillhole GXMCMTD03, 22.5m) | 82 |
Figure 6-10 – Geometallurgical (“GeoMet”) Model Venn diagram | 82 |
Figure 6-11 – Cross-section looking east showing modelled pegmatite plus sub-domained, spodumene-rich core | 85 |
Figure 7-1 – Regional map showing various surface samples collected across the Mt Cattlin tenements | 88 |
Figure 7-2 – Light vehicle-mounted auger sample locations | 89 |
Figure 7-3 – Mt Short contours of calculated fractionation index from soil sample assays | 90 |
Figure 7-4 – Enduro Prospect location map and K/Rb ratios | 91 |
Figure 7-5 – Pleiades satellite image with overlying Mt Cattlin tenements | 93 |
Figure 7-6 – Aeromagnetic image of the Mt Cattlin area (TMI) | 94 |
Figure 7-7 – Ground penetrating radar survey location plan with profile location shown in red | 95 |
Figure 7-8 – Map of the resource modelling export extents | 97 |
Figure 7-9 – Map of Variable Grade Control Drillhole Spacing in the SE Pit | 105 |
Figure 7-10 – Plan view of Mt Cattlin, with the location of the geotechnical drill holes and basic pit dimensions | 107 |
Figure 7-11 – Summary of the geotechnical drilling phases by year, highlighting recent holes | 108 |
Figure 10-1 – 2017 HLS Test Work Results | 128 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 10-2 – Theoretical grade recovery curves, using actual daily plant data from 2021 | 131 |
Figure 10-3 – Mt Cattlin Grade-Recovery Curves | 132 |
Figure 10-4 – Location of drillholes for metallurgical testwork in the NW pit area | 135 |
Figure 10-5 – NW Pit Stage 4 Metallurgical Samples | 136 |
Figure 11-1 – Plan view of the drillhole collars and updated Pegmatite wireframes | 139 |
Figure 11-2 – Cross-section showing an example of Na2O grades informing the boundary between the mineralized pegmatites and the fine-grained skins | 140 |
Figure 11-3 – Plan view of the NW and SW Areas and updated wireframes in the Jan 2023 MRE update | 145 |
Figure 11-4 – Cross section looking North at 224,202 E, through Pegmatite 61 and 62 | 148 |
Figure 11-5 – Cross-Section 6282329N | 153 |
Figure 12-1 – SMU Re-Blocking Process | 162 |
Figure 12-2 – Clean and Contaminated Ore Blocks After Re-Blocking | 163 |
Figure 12-3 – Product Grade - Recovery Curve (SC5.2 and SC5.4) | 166 |
Figure 12-4 – Summary of Mined Tonnes, Cashflow, and NPV by Shell (NB reported in Australian Dollar currency) | 167 |
Figure 12-5 – Summary of C1 Cost and Ore Tonnes by Shell (NB reported in Australian Dollar currency) | 168 |
Figure 12-6 – Cross section showing the Pit Design Stages Including Ore Zones Colored by Li2O Grade, and 31 March 2023 Topography | 169 |
Figure 12-7 – Key Changes in Ore Tonnage Waterfall Graph | 173 |
Figure 13-1 – Plan view of Mt Cattlin, with the location of the geotechnical drill holes and basic pit dimensions | 179 |
Figure 13-2 – Plan view of preliminary Stage 4 pit design, with the location of laboratory test samples along each drill hole | 181 |
Figure 13-3 – Long-section view of preliminary Stage 4 pit design (looking east), with the location of laboratory test samples along each drill hole | 181 |
Figure 13-4 – Long-section view of a preliminary Stage 4 pit design (looking east) | 183 |
Figure 13-5 – Photogrammetric model and digitized structures in the Stage 4 pit | 183 |
Figure 13-6 – Stereonet plot generated in Dips 8.0 displaying all major structures at Mt Cattlin (based on all data sources combined) | 184 |
Figure 13-7 – Plan view of a preliminary Stage 4 pit design with related dyke and fault models provided by Allkem | 185 |
Figure 13-8 – Plan view of the preliminary Stage 4 pit design, with the location of Section A and Section B for stability analysis | 189 |
Figure 13-9 – Slide section for Section A, looking north-east | 190 |
Figure 13-10 – Slide section for Section B, looking north-west Slope Design Parameters | 191 |
Figure 13-11 – Pit slope design elements, geometries, and terminology | 192 |
Figure 13-12 – Haul Road Schematic | 193 |
Figure 13-13 – Stage 4-1 Showing Dimensions in Plan View with Ore Blocks Colored by Li2O Grade | 194 |
Figure 13-14 – Stage 4-1 Long Section 6,282,520 mN showing Pit Depth | 195 |
Figure 13-15 – Stage 4-2 Showing Dimensions in Plan View with Ore Blocks Colored by Li2O Grade | 196 |
Figure 13-16 – Stage 42 Long Section 6,282,520 mN | 196 |
Figure 13-17 – Interaction of Stage 4-1 and Stage 4-2 Designs in Plan View | 197 |
Figure 13-18 – Cross section showing the Pit Design Stages Including Ore Zones Colored by Li2O Grade, and 31 March 2023 Topography | 198 |
Figure 13-19 – Pit Design Outlines and Waste Dump Locations | 198 |
Figure 13-20 – Scheduled Process Plant Feed by Pit Stage | 200 |
Figure 13-21 – Scheduled Process Plant Feed by Clean and Contaminated Ore | 200 |
Figure 13-22 – Total Material Movement by Pit Stage (BCM) | 201 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 13-23 – Ore (t) Removed by Pit Stage | 20` |
Figure 13-24 – ROM Balance (BCM) | 202 |
Figure 14-1 – Mt Cattlin Process Flowsheet | 205 |
Figure 15-1 – Key Infrastructure Items | 211 |
Figure 15-2 – Tailings Storage Facilities | 218 |
Figure 15-3 – Aerial image of the currently decommissioned TSF as of March 2021 | 219 |
Figure 15-4 – Aerial image of the existing in-pit tailings storage in March 2021 | 220 |
Figure 15-5 – TSF1 Surface RL Profile | 220 |
Figure 15-6 – SE IPTSF Decant Pond and Return Water System (October 2022) | 221 |
Figure 16-1 – Lithium Industry Flowchart (Wood Mackenzie) | 225 |
Figure 16-2 – Global Demand for Lithium by End Use, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mackenzie) | 226 |
Figure 16-3 – Global Demand for Lithium by Product, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mackenzie) | 226 |
Figure 16-4 – Refined Lithium Production by Raw Material Source, 2023 – 2050 (kt LCE) | 227 |
Figure 16-5 – Refined production by Final Product, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mckenzie) | 228 |
Figure 16-6 – Top 5 Global Lithium Producers of Refined Lithium, 2023 and 2033 (%) – (Wood Mackenzie) | 229 |
Figure 16-7 – Lithium Carbonate Price Outlook, 2023 – 2050 | 230 |
Figure 16-8 – Lithium Hydroxide Price Outlook, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mackenzie) | 231 |
Figure 16-9 – Chemical-grade Spodumene Price Outlook, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mackenzie) | 231 |
Figure 17-1 – Lithology Sampling (Stage 3 and Stage 4 Pit) | 236 |
Figure 17-2 – Lithology Sampling Cross Section | 236 |
Figure 17-3 – Stage 3 to Stage 4 Lithological Extension | 237 |
Figure 17-4 – Photograph of Isolated Paddock Trees and Shrubs, WD2 Expansion Area (March 2023) | 238 |
Figure 17-5 – Hydrological Assessment Study Location | 245 |
Figure 17-6 – Average Monthly Rainfall Recorded at Ravensthorpe Station (BoM ID: 7068) (BoM, 2021a) | 246 |
Figure 17-7 – IFD Data for Mt Cattlin Study Area (BoM, 2021b) | 247 |
Figure 17-8 – Catchment Analysis | 248 |
Figure 17-9 – Proposed WD and pit expansions and existing Cattlin Creek diversion and flood bunds (FPB1 and FPB2) | 249 |
Figure 17-10 – Locations Where Existing Flood Protection Bunds are to be Upgraded at Mine Closure | 252 |
Figure 17-11 – WD1: Recommended Drainage Upgrades for Mine Closure | 253 |
Figure 17-12 – Pre-Mining Groundwater Levels (m AHD) (Rockwater, 2023) | 254 |
Figure 17-13 – Change in Groundwater Levels (m) From 2008-10 to December 2022 (Rockwater, 2023) | 255 |
Figure 17-14 – Pre-Mining Salinity (mg/L TDS) (Rockwater, 2023) | 256 |
Figure 17-15 – Section Through Stage 4 Pit Showing Pre-Mining and Final Void Groundwater Levels | 259 |
Figure 18-1 – Annual Expenditure by Major Category | 277 |
Figure 19-1 – Monthly Project Revenue | 283 |
Figure 19-2 – Period Revenue and Costs, and Cumulative Cash Balance | 285 |
Figure 19-3 – Cashflow Sensitivity to Key Revenue and Cost Factor Variables | 287 |
Figure 19-4 – Cashflow Sensitivity to Key Revenue and Cost Factor Variables | 287 |
Figure 19-5 – NPV Sensitivity to Key Revenue and Cost Factor Variables | 288 |
Figure 20-1 – Tenement Map Showing Properties Adjacent to the Mt Cattlin Tenements | 292 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
1. Executive Summary
1.1 | Introduction |
Allkem Limited (Allkem or the Company) engaged Mining Plus to prepare, alongside an employee of Allkem set forth herein, this Technical Summary Report for its 100% owned Mt Cattlin Lithium Project (the Project) in Western Australia.
This report provides all the supporting details for the Mt Cattlin S-K 1300 Technical Report, the first report lodged for this property.
This report supports Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves estimates using the standards and definitions in the S-K 1300 requirements. It presents the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates, capital and operating costs, and an economic assessment based on open pit mining operations with on-site processing to produce spodumene and tantalite concentrates as of 30 June 2023.
The report is compiled from a Feasibility Study conducted into the mining of resource extensions of the existing operations which complimented the NI-43101 compliant Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Estimate with an effective date of 30 June 2023. All units of measurement within this report are metric unless otherwise stated. Monetary Units are in US dollars, unless stated otherwise. The Registrant for this report is Allkem Limited.
Mining Plus has compiled this report with an Allkem employee from various sources, dominantly the Mt Cattlin Stage 4 Feasibility Study and NI 43-101 report that support the reserve study which were supplied to Mining Plus by Allkem.
The Mining Plus employees that prepared this report and the Allkem employee set forth herein are each Qualified persons as set out in Chapter 2. Mining Plus has been engaged by Allkem in a number of studies related to Mineral Resource Estimates and Ore Reserve Estimates that contributed the Feasibility Study and has visited site.
The report is solely concerned with the Mt Cattlin Operation and is the first SK-1300 report on the project.
1.2 | Property Description, Mineral Rights and Ownership |
The Mt Cattlin operations is located 2km south of the township of Ravensthorpe, 450km southwest of Perth, Western Australia. There is established access to the site via major road networks (Figure 1-1).
Mt Cattlin was commissioned in 2010 and has been operated since, except for approximately three years between 2012-2016 when the operation was placed into care and maintenance due to market conditions.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
The operation comprises a 1.8Mtpa capacity processing plant, an open pit (the 4th developed on the site) and onsite supporting infrastructure of power generation, water supply, tailings storage facilities and various administration buildings.
Processing operations are managed by Mt Cattlin employees and mining is conducted by contract services.
The operation produces spodumene concentrate, that is trucked to the nearby port of Esperance and sold into the international lithium market, and tantalite concentrate which is sold to a nearby purchaser.
Figure 1-1 – Location map of Mt Cattlin.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
The project is situated on the Mining lease M74/244 which covers 1830 Ha and was granted on 24 December 2009 and is due to expire in December 2030. There are an additional 20 Exploration Licenses, Prospecting Licenses and Miscellaneous Leases totaling 2001 Ha. The Mining Lease is wholly owned by Allkem who also holds freehold title of the land subject to the current mining operations.
Royalties are payable to the Western Australian State Government of 5% of the revenue realized from the spodumene concentrate, and an additional royalty of US$1.05 per tonne of crushed ore is paid to Lithium Royalty Corp.
1.3 | Accessibility, Climate, Local Resource, Infrastructure and Physiography |
As an existing operation, Mt Cattlin is service by established infrastructure, including sealed roads to site and a highway network to Perth and the nearest regional centers of Albany and Esperance, both of which support heavy industry and have regional airports, as well as an export port located at Esperance.
Ravensthorpe has a Mediterranean climate, featuring moist, mild winters and hot, dry summers. The area receives an average annual rainfall of 113mm with annual average minimum and maximum temperatures at 10.5oC and 22.8oC, respectively.
The local topography is undulating, with the maximum elevation at 265m above sea level. The Cattlin Creek passes through the project area and separates the Eastern and Western Mining Areas. The region has largely been cleared for livestock and grain production.
1.4 | History |
Mt Cattlin is owned by Galaxy Lithium Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allkem Limited, the current ownership structure is illustrated in Figure 1-2
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 1-2 – Mt Cattlin Corporate Ownership Structure.
The tenements were held by numerous companies since the 1960’s until Galaxy Resources acquired the mining Lease M74/12 from the administrators of Sons of Gwalia Limited in 2006. Each of these companies conducted exploration activities through both reverse circulation (RC) drilling and diamond drilling exploration methods.
Extensive test work was carried out by WMC, who completed an internal feasibility study on mining the deposit in the 1960’s.
Galaxy Resources established the mining operation, and a processing plant was commissioned in 2010 and was in production until 2012 when the operation was placed into care and maintenance due to market conditions. The operation was re-commissioned in 2016 and has been in continuous production since (Table 1-1).
Table 1-1 – Concentrate Production by year.
Year | Concentrate Produced (dmt) |
Q 1 2023 | 38,915 |
2022 | 107,417 |
2021 | 230,065 |
2020 | 108,658 |
2019 | 191,570 |
2018 | 156,689 |
2017 | 155,679 |
2016 | 9,700 |
2015 | - |
2014 | - |
2013 | - |
2012 | 54,047 |
2011 |
63,863 |
2010 | 1,645 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
A maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for Mt Cattlin by Galaxy Resources was released in 2007 prior to the company listing on the ASX.
1.5 | Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit |
The Mt Cattlin deposit is a spodumene-rich tantalite-bearing pegmatite within the Ravensthorpe Terrane, with host rocks comprising both the Annabelle Volcanics to the west and the Manyutup Tonalite to the east. The contact between these rock types transects the deposit area.
The pegmatites host the lithium-rich mineralization and are of the albite-spodumene sub-type (Wells et al, 2020) and occur as a series of gently dipping sub-horizontal sills surrounded by both volcanic and intrusive rocks. Several dolerite or quartz gabbro dykes trending roughly east-northeast and north cut all the lithologies including the pegmatite units. A significant sub-vertical fault with a north-northwest trending orientation transgresses the western side of the currently defined orebody and offsets the pegmatite as well as the main east-northeast trending dolerite dyke. Displacement across this fault appears to be oblique, with a west block down sinistral movement. The weathering profile across the Mt Cattlin area is typically shallow, with fresh rock encountered sometimes at depths of less than 20 meters below the surface.
Lithium and tantalum mineralization occurs within the pegmatites. In places, the pegmatite occurs as stacked horizons that overlap in cross-section. The current extent of mineralization covers an area of around 1.6 km east-west and 1 km north-south. The main pegmatite units drilled to date generally lie between 30 m and 60 m below the surface, although in some locations they can be found as surface outcrops. Pegmatite units have been noted to occur up to 140 m below the surface to the northwest of the main orebody and may have the potential to be mined from underground.
The pegmatites have a diverse mineralogy hosting a rich array of minerals with spodumene as the dominant lithium ore mineral. Several types of spodumene are observed, which include light green and white varieties. Tantalum occurs as the manganese-rich end members of the columbite-tantalite series, including manganotantalite and microlite (Sweetapple, 2010).
Based on apparent mineral assemblages and textures, Mt Cattlin has been categorized as an albite-spodumene type with the LCT classification. Moreover, the relatively highly coarse nature of spodumene at Mt Cattlin compared to that of other LCT pegmatites in WA suggests that these pegmatites crystallized from a high-fluxing agent melt (Wells et al., 2022).
A geometallurgical approach to modelling the deposit geology at Mt Cattlin has been adopted. This approach aims to integrate the information required to ensure that the produced spodumene
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
concentrate meets product specifications including requirements for a minimum lithia grade, plus upper limits of deleterious elements.
1.6 | Exploration |
Mt Cattlin’s has acquired several tenements and has an active exploration program that includes surface geology mapping, rock chip and soil sampling, remote sensing, and airborne and ground geophysics.
Figure 1-3 – Location of granted exploration licenses, prospecting licenses, and mining leases in the Ravensthorpe area.
Tenements to the east of Ravensthorpe comprising the West Kundip and McMahon Projects contain manganese and copper gold targets. To the north of Mt Cattlin, rock chip sampling of outcropping pegmatites returned highly anomalous tantalum values and elevated lithium values at the Enduro
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Prospect. Further evaluation and drilling returned the best intercept of 2 m at 1.45% Li2O. Further drilling is planned.
Projects to the west and south of Mt Cattlin, which have been explored for pegmatite-hosted lithium and tantalum mineralization include the Bakers Hill, Floater and Sirdar projects. Programs of mainly surface sampling and geological mapping have been carried out over these tenements in addition to airborne geophysics.
This report does not include the estimate or disclosure of any exploration targets.
1.7 | Drilling |
The drillhole dataset within the Mineral Resource estimate extents contains 3,956 drillholes for a total of 181,895.45 m.
Summary drillhole details have been provided for all drilling inside the resource limits in Table 1-2and for all other Mt Cattlin tenements in Table 1-3.
Table 1-2 – Summary drillhole data within the resource extents.
Hole Type | Avg (m) | Count | Total (m) |
RC | 79.0 | 2,825 | 223,197 |
RABR | 55.9 | 5,651 | 3,131 |
DDH | 86.6 | 9,697 | 8,319 |
RC_DD | 114.6 | 4,718 | 5,390 |
PC | 21.9 | 120 | 2,627 |
Table 1-3 – Summary drillhole data for all Mt Cattlin tenements.
Hole Type | Avg (m) | Count | Total (m) |
RC | 81 | 494 | 40,037 |
RAB | 23 | 112 | 2,575 |
DDH | 63 | 63 | 5,971 |
RC_DDT | 97 | 9 | 874 |
From 2017 onwards, field geological logging data has been predominantly captured using the Maxwell LogChief logging program, which is then transferred directly to the main SQL database. LogChief logging templates are consistent between exploration and GC drilling programs, with the exception of quality control sampling for which there are slightly differing methodologies.
In 2023, 105 new vertical grade control drillholes were completed for 6,457 m, post the 2022 MRE estimate, to reduce data spacing to approximately 20 x 20 m spacing to support operational ore selectively and material dispatch.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Campaigns of Geotechnical drilling have been completed for the project, including 3 specifically for the extension of open pits in Stage 4.
1.8 | Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security |
At Mt Cattlin, the host pegmatite is visually distinguishable from the surrounding country rock; therefore, sampling is taken selectively within RC chips and diamond core. Currently, 3 m of waste rock is sampled adjacent to the pegmatite to characterize the waste likely to be encountered during mining.
QAQC samples have been submitted routinely into all sample batches sent to the assaying laboratories.
Mt Cattlin QAQC protocols have undergone several improvements since 2016. QAQC frequencies since 2017 are provided in Table 1-4.
Table 1-4 – Galaxy Phase 2 QC policies by year pre-2022.
Grade Control | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
Standard | approximately 1 in 60 to 70 | 1 in 25 | 1 in 25 | 1 in 25 | |
Blank | approximately 1 in 60 to 70 | 1 in 25 (approximate) | 1 in 25 | 1 in 25 | |
Duplicate | approximately 1 in 60 to 70 | 1 in 25 | 1 in 25 | 1 in 25 | |
Exploration | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
Standard | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 25 |
Blank | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 25 or one per mineralized interval minimum |
Duplicate | 1 in 20 | 1 in 20 | 1 in 20 | 1 in 20 | 1 in 20 |
QAQC controls continued in 2021 and 2022, the field duplicate frequency was 1 per 14 samples, blind, 1 per 19 samples and blind blanks 1 per 24 samples, in line with 2021 frequency rates.
Multiples campaigns of bulk density determinations from diamond drill core for the project have been undertaken. These have been analyzed by standard immersion method on site and also a campaign of laboratory analysis by hydrostatic weighing methods.
The sample preparation methods, security, assaying and QAQC control measures are appropriate for the type and style of mineralization at Mt Cattlin.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
1.9 | Data Verification |
An inspection of the property was made between 11-13 April 2022, 11-13 July 2022, 21-23 September 2022, and 12-14 December 2022. Chapter 9: Data Verification summarizes the observations made, plus associated recommendations.
1.10 | Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing |
Mt Cattlin utilizes conventional processing techniques to generate spodumene and by-product tantalite concentrates from open pit mining of the pegmatite ore deposit.
The plant has capacity to process up to 1.8 Mt of ore, having been subject to a series of upgrades since the original 1 Mt capacity facility was commissioned in 2010. Campaigns of test work have led to improvements in the processing circuit, including the addition of Optical sorting.
Plant recovery estimates used in the economic assessment of reserves are based on grade-recovery curves that were derived from historical plant performance and reflect a range of plant feed grades and concentrate grades. Periods of production affected by un-representative ore feed was excluded from analysis.
Since February 2023, when ore feed has been from the NW Stage 3 pit, recoveries have been in line with or exceeded expectations.
Metallurgical test work for the NW pit area conducted in 2021 consisted of a heavy liquid separation (HLS) program on two drill composites to determine the materials amenability to dense media separation. Mineralized core sections were selected with no additional waste dilution, generating head grades of 1.85% and 1.02% Li2O respectively.
Additional work in 2022 tested geometallurgical properties of the pegmatites in the NW pit area.
An additional four (4) metallurgical drillholes have been drilled into the Stage 4 resource, test work results were not available at the time of reserve update, which will test the continuity of mineralization and recovery expectations for the bulk of the Stage 4 resource.
The history of production, geometallurgical understanding and some metallurgical testing of the pegmatites in the NW pit area support the use of the recovery curves.
The now completed initial tailings facility (TSF1) are included in resources and ore reserves, a modest 900kt @ 0.8% Li2O of the reserves, and subject to further study, floatation testing has shown the potential to recover 30% of the contained metal to a saleable concentrate.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
1.11 | Mineral Resource Estimate |
The spodumene mineralization at Mt Cattlin is entirely hosted within the numerous flat-dipping pegmatite sills which are cross-cut and offset by late-stage faults. The geological interpretation exercise resulted in a total of 13 individual pegmatite domains and one intrusive dolerite modelled and used to control the block model estimation process. Interpretations for weathering surfaces that differentiate the fresh rock from partially weathered or transitional material, and the transitional material from completely oxidized rock, were supplied by Allkem personnel.
The Li₂O grade distributions within the pegmatite geological domains indicate the presence of mineral zonation and differentiation into high and low-grade lithia zones. Modelling of the Li2O mineralization was completed utilizing a combination of Leapfrog Geo software to explicitly model the internal coarse-grained, mineralized spodumene using a 0.3% Li2O cut-off, 4% Na2O cut-off at the peripheries, and geological logging of coarse-grained pegmatite.
Ordinary kriging was used to estimate Li2O , Ta2O5 and Fe2O3 grades into both the mineralized and un-mineralized pegmatite domains, with domains sub-divided further into oxidized and transitional/fresh domains where applicable.
Dynamic anisotropy was used in the block model estimation to accommodate the highly variable dip of the pegmatites. Dynamically adjusting the search ellipse and variogram orientation, the dynamic anisotropy process attempts to capture the maximum amount of composite data within the search ellipse.
The estimation process for the Mineral Resources was completed in January 2023.
Continuing mining operations have resulted in waste rock backfill and tailings backfill being stored in completed open pits. Backfill volumes have been coded into the block model using survey wireframes provided by Allkem. The Mineral Resource block model has been depleted using the surveyed as-built surface as of 30 June 2023.
A thorough series of statistical validation and visual model checks have been completed, indicating that the MRE block model is within the error of the informing composite samples.
Classification has been applied on the basis of the data spacing, geology and grade continuity, and the estimation quality parameter of slope of regression. Only areas drilled by Grade Control (GC) methods have been classified as Measured Resources. The Indicated Resource areas are typically drilled at 40 m by 40 m spacing and have been estimated in passes one or two. The Inferred Resource areas are typically drilled at 80 m by 80 m spaced drilling or greater and have been estimated in passes two and three.
The Mineral Resource has been depleted for mining to the 30th of June 2023 and reporting includes within an optimized Whittle pit shell (US$1500/t concentrate) that meets the requirement for Reasonable Prospects of Eventual Economic Extraction (RPEEE).
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
The Mineral Resource includes surface stockpiles which comprise interim direct feed mined material, a low-grade stockpile, secondary floats, and pre-2018 tailings. The stockpiles have been classified based on the level of confidence in the grade and tonnage.
The Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource, reported at a cut-off grade (COG) of 0.3% Li2O, as of 30 June 2023, is detailed in Table 1-5.
Table 1-5 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource as of 30 June 2023, COG >= 0.3% Li2O.
1.12 | Mineral Reserves Estimate |
A Mineral Reserve estimate was completed based on the Mineral Resource Estimate and modifying factors including processing inputs determined from analysis of actual operating performance at the Mt Cattlin site, a competitive mining cost tendering process, and a feasibility level study for the Mt Cattlin Stage 4 Expansion.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
The reserves comprise the remaining reserves at the currently mined Stage 3, the prospective Stage 4-1 and Stage 4-2 and stockpiles.
The reserves are based on open pit mining of Stage 4-1 and Stage 4-2, a feasibility study was commenced in May 2023 to consider the alternate underground mining of Stage 4-2.
Based on these modifying factors and the geological block models, pit optimizations were run to select the optimum pit shell which formed the basis of the mine design.
A full mine design was completed to a feasibility study level including a detailed geotechnical study and ore loss and dilution study. The design was based on the optimization taking into consideration other factors such as ore boundaries, haul roads, infrastructure and key processing and economic parameters at final feasibility level to support an economic evaluation and produce a Mineral Reserve Estimate.
The Mt Cattlin Mineral Reserve estimate as of 30 June 2023 was finalized as set out in Table 1-6.
Table 1-6 – 2023 Ore Reserve Update. Effective Date June 30, 2023
Category | Location | Tonnage | Grade | Grade | Cont. Metal | Cont. Metal |
Mt | % Li2O | ppm Ta2O5 | (‘000) t Li2O | (‘000) lb. Ta2O5 | ||
Proven | In-situ | 0.2 | 0.9 | 120 | 1.4 | 45 |
Probable | In-situ | 5.2 | 1.3 | 130 | 69 | 1,500 |
Stockpiles | 1.8 | 0.8 | 95 | 13 | 390 | |
Total Mineral Reserves | 7.1 | 1.2 | 120 | 84 | 1,900 | |
1) Ore Reserve is estimated as of 30 June 2023 and depleted for production through to 30 June 2023 | ||||||
2) Ore Reserves are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.3% Li2O | ||||||
3) Estimate have been rounded to a maximum of two significant figures | ||||||
4) Totals may appear different from the sum of their components due to rounding. |
Mt Cattlin has sustainable mining reserves for the next four to five years, with the underlying resource drill constrained and warranting continued exploration. The increasing stripping ratio with the greater depths to access ore via open pit mining methodology is being evaluated against the option of underground mining.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 1-4 – Proposed pit staging.
The pit staging, shown in Figure 1-4 as applied in the economic assessment (Stage 3, Stage 4-Phase 1, Stage 4-Phase 2) individually have quite different stripping ratios and risk characteristics to the overall project average. Stage 3 is very low risk and generates the 72% of the overall cashflow, whilst Stage 4-1 which generates 5% of the overall cashflow and Stage 4-2 which generates 18% of overall cashflow have higher stripping ratios and lower returns. The End of Project Stockpiles generate 5% of overall cashflow.
1.13 | Mining Method |
Mt Cattlin is a conventional hard rock truck and shovel open pit mine used to extract and transport ore to the processing plant. The mine uses drill and blast methods of rock breakage to advance the pit in 10m high benches with mining and load and haul 2.5m horizontal flitches.
Allkem utilize mining contractors for drill and blast as well as load and haul operations with the contractor providing a primary excavation fleet and ancillary support equipment including grader, water cart, service trucks, light vehicles, and lighting plants.
Ore mining rates are based on a plan to provide continuous feed to the plant at a rate of 1.8Mtpa. However, waste stripping requirements have resulted in the plant feed of 1.8Mpa only being achieved in the first year, Figure 1-5. Waste rock is stored on pre-designed waste dumps or where practical used to back fill completed pits.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 1-5 – Proposed plant feed sent to the mill based on initial production plan.
The mining method and mine design parameters were selected based on geotechnical properties of the rock, hydrological and hydrogeological factors as well as the economic ore boundaries provided to Mining Plus by Allkem.
Mt Cattlin has commenced an underground feasibility study in May 2023 into mining the resource outside of Stage 4-1.
1.14 | Processing and Recovery Methods |
The Mt Cattlin processing plant is located immediately to the west of the mining area and utilizes conventional processing techniques to generate spodumene and by-product tantalite concentrates.
The plant has capacity to process up to 1.8 Mt of ore, having been subject to a series of upgrades since the original 1 Mt capacity facility was commissioned in 2010. The processing plant has operated on a continuous basis since restarting after a care and maintenance period between 2013-2016 and consists of a multi-stage crushing, screening, optical ore sorting, dense media separation and gravity concentration.
Spodumene concentrate produced is trucked to the Port of Esperance for loading and shipment to customers predominantly located in China. Tantalite by-product concentrate is bagged on site and freighted to the nearby Global Advanced Metals (GAM) Greenbushes operation.
Recent plant recoveries have been in line with expectations and consistently exceeded 60%.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
1.15 | Infrastructure |
Access to the Mt Cattlin site is via sealed road from Ravensthorpe, which is connected to Perth, Albany, and Esperance centers via a well-maintained highway network. Concentrate is trucked to the Port of Esperance via the South Coast Highway. The port has capacity for 45,000 tonnes of concentrate storage prior to ship loading.
Mt Cattlin site has internal unsealed roads suitable for mining operations and transport requirements.
Site process water is currently sourced as return water from the current South East In Pit Tailings Storage Facility (SE IPTSF) and “make up” water is sourced from the mined out Northeast pit and . In order to utilize the current NE pit as an in-pit tailings storage facility, bore pumps will be established in the proposed in pit tailings to access “return water”, rock back fill around the bores is expected to protect the bores from tailings infiltration. A new source of “make up” process water will be required.
Raw water for other site purposes is sourced from nearby boreholes.
Drilling is currently underway to identify alternative sources of water in the area for use once the Northeast pit is used for tailings storage. Ongoing process water availability and permitting is considered to be a key risk for the project expansion post-cessation of the NE pit for a source of water.
Power is supplied to site via a 7MW diesel generation power plant with onsite power reticulation servicing the site power requirements.
The administration and ancillary buildings are already on site and in place.
The processing plant is onsite at Mt Cattlin and consists of a crushing circuit, optical beneficiation circuit, dense media separation (DMS) circuit, product handling facilities and a tailings storage facility (TSF).
There is an explosives magazine on site which is owned and managed by Allkem, and bulk explosives are provide via a contractor.
Tailings were initially deposited in the above ground Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) situated 500m north of the processing plant until 2019. From 2019 until early 2022 tailings were deposited into the “mined out” 2SW pit. From early 2022 tailings have been deposited into the 2SE.
The capacity of the 2SE pit is expected to be exhausted in early 2024, thereafter it is planned to deposit tailings into the 2NE pit which will be sufficient to store tailings from the Reserves.
The tailings within the 2SW pit will require relocation to mine the Stage 4 NE pits studied in this report, it is currently planned that these tails will be dry stacked on the initial above ground tailings facility.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
1.16 | Market Studies & Contracts |
Lithium has traditionally been used for applications such as ceramic glazes and porcelain enamels, glass ceramics for high-temperature applications, lubricating greases, and as a catalyst for polymer production, however rechargeable batteries represent the dominant application of lithium today, representing more than 80% of global lithium demand in 2022. Within the rechargeable battery segment, 58% was attributed to automotive applications, which has grown at 69% annually since 2020. This segment is expected to drive lithium demand growth in future.
Spodumene is the most mined mineral for lithium, with historical and active deposits exploited in China, Australia, Brazil, the USA, and Russia. The high lithium content of spodumene (approximately 8% lithia), its well-defined extraction process, and spodumene typically occurring in more extensive pegmatite deposits make it an essential mineral in the lithium industry.
Wood Mackenzie forecasts a short period of supply volatility in the years to 2030, moving from surplus to deficit and oversupply before entering a sustained deficit beyond 2031. Reflecting this dynamic, prices are expected to align with market imbalances. Wood Mackenzie forecasts a long-term price between US$2,000 per tonne and US$3,000 per tonne (real US$2023 terms) (Figure 16-9).
Figure 1-6 – Chemical-grade Spodumene Price Outlook, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mackenzie).
Allkem’s shipments of spodumene concentrate are contracted on a spot basis as required to meet customers under existing off-take agreements.
1.17 | Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social Community impact, Negotiations, Contracts with Local Communities and Groups |
1.17.1 | Environmental Studies and Permits |
Allkem have completed numerous baseline environmental studies (during and prior to operations) and all key studies have been completed and there are no ongoing constraints preventing ongoing
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
development and mining. Additional baseline studies will be required for waste dumping space to the Northeast (Waste Dump 4) if required.
Allkem has obtained all relevant permits required to operate as current and understands the future permitting requirements and believe that there are no constraints that will prevent permitting.
Key Permits listed below in Table 1-7.
Table 1-7 – Mt Cattlin permits and key legislation.
Governing Agency | Permit and Governing Legislation |
Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage – DPLH) | Section 18 permits |
Environmental Protection Act 1986 (Department of Water and Environmental Regulation – DWER) | Part V Prescribed Premises
License: L 8469/2010/2, Part V Clearing Permits: CPS 3045/5, CPS 8052/2, CPS 8049/1 |
Mines Safety and Inspection Act 1994 (Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety) | Project Management Plan |
Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (Department of Water and Environmental Regulation) | Groundwater License: GWL 167439(5) |
To ensure compliance, Allkem submits Annual Environmental Reports to the relevant government agencies. To date there have been no material non-compliance issues with any permit conditions or legislative requirements at Mt Cattlin.
The regulatory approval request is submitted to the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) in a Mining Proposal, the Mining Proposal provides detailed information on the identification, evaluation, and management of the environmental impacts. All Mining Proposals must include a mine closure plan.
A Mining Proposal has been lodged with the regulator (DMIRS) for the development of Stage 4-1 NW pit and additional waste dumping. Approval was considered routine and was expected in August 2023.
A new Mining Proposal will need to be submitted following the receipt of the approval for the currently lodged proposal, to permit the use of NE pit IPTSF. The new TSF will be the third similar style of TSF at Mt Cattlin and therefore is not a novel concept. Whilst the approval should be relatively straightforward and non-controversial, the time remaining to design and gain the approval, inclusive of any intermediate delays or required changes of scope, be a risk to production schedule given the expected exhaustion of tailings capacity in the SE pit IPTSF in mid-2024.
A further Mining Proposal process will commence upon the successful receipt of the currently lodged Mining Proposal discussed above, to provide optionality for the project whilst the technical, economic, and social trade-offs of a pit cut-back for Stage 4-2 NW and/or an underground operation are assessed as the most appropriate mining methodology. Should open pit mining of Stage 4-2 be decided on by
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Allkem and further waste dumping space to the Northeast be required then an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) referral will be required. The EPA referral is required as the area being considered for extra waste dumping would require clearing a significant area of native vegetation.
Other Stage 4 capital projects, such as the development of a dedicated staff village on freehold, a new and modernized power supply, and groundwater abstraction will require a series of new and/or altered Works Approvals or modifications to Licenses, issued by the WA State Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER).
Allkem has no known environmental liabilities other than rehabilitation/ closure obligations.
Allkem is required to pay a per hectare unit rate for land disturbance as part of the Mining Rehabilitation Fund Regulations 2013.
The closure and rehabilitation of the site post operations is prescribed in the Mine Closure Plan prepared in accordance with the Department of Mining, Industry, Regulation and Safety and outlines the closure obligations. The Mine Closure Plan identifies and sets out management of any potential closure issues and defines and outlines the site rehabilitation requirements.
Mt Cattlin has focused on mine scheduling that allows for progressive rehabilitation to all disturbed land during operations. Annual rehabilitation monitoring is conducted on site and a detailed Closure Cost Estimate (CCE) is completed annually. An updated Mine Closure Plan has been submitted with the current Mining Proposal which estimates a closure cost of US$12.3m.
Mt Cattlin has built up social credit with the local community over the past decade through local employment, operating without major incident, and initiatives such as the Community Consultation Group (CCG) and site Open Days.
1.17.2 | Land Disturbance |
Prior to mining development, the site was privately owned and cleared agricultural land.
The current total area of land disturbance approved for all mining and exploration activities is approximately 380 Ha, sufficient for the expected life of mine, with proposed expansions on previously disturbed agricultural land.
For all land disturbance activities, Allkem conduct baseline environmental and heritage surveys, obtain the relevant approvals, and then clear vegetation and stockpile the topsoil/sub soil away from drainage for use in rehabilitation activities.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
1.17.3 | Dust, Noise and Blast Vibrations |
Mt Cattlin is proximal to the Ravensthorpe township, increasing sensitivity to noise and dust emissions. These aspects are monitored and managed via the Operational Noise Management Plan and the Airborne Material Management Plan respectively as part of their licensing, which includes monitoring and management and protocols for incidents and complaints made.
Allkem has developed a Blast Management Plan along with long term vibration and air blast monitoring programs to manage impacts due to blast vibrations.
1.17.4 | Stakeholders and Community Engagement |
Allkem has committed to ongoing consultation with its stakeholders, currently listed in Table 1-8.
Table 1-8 – Identified Key Stakeholders and their Interest in the Project.
Organization | Interest |
● Department of Water and Environment Regulation (DWER) ● Department of Mines, Industry Regulation, and Safety (DMIRS) ● Department of Planning, Lands, and Heritage (DPLH)
|
● Licensing and closure planning ● Contaminated site identification and remediation ● Water supply and groundwater licensing, usage monitoring and aquifer sustainability ● Disturbance management ● Evidence of rehabilitation standards ● Performance securities ● Closure provisioning ● Transfer of mine infrastructure to local landowners at closure Indigenous heritage sites and agreements. |
● Shire of Ravensthorpe |
● Community support programs ● Infrastructure use including potential transfer and management of former mine infrastructure. |
● Southern Noongar and Wagyl Kaip traditional owners ● South-West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council |
● Protection of Aboriginal heritage sites ● Preservation of the natural landscape. |
● Mt Cattlin Community Consultation Group (MTCCCG) representing the broader Ravensthorpe community |
● Conserving the amenity and aesthetic value of Ravensthorpe township and surrounds ● Community involvement in rehabilitation and closure activities ● Post mining land use. |
● Ravensthorpe business community ● Surrounding Property Owners |
● Land access ● Exploration activities ● Post mining land use ● Infrastructure transfer/retention ● Weed management. |
Allkem has created a Community Consultation Group, a joint forum between Allkem and the Ravensthorpe community to provide a platform for the community to communicate directly with the
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
company, who meet regularly with the aim to improve the social well-being of individuals and organizations within the community.
1.18 | Capital and Operating Costs |
The operating costs, being based on site budgets and operating history, or in the case of mining, a negotiated tender and detailed schedule, are at a Feasibility level of confidence.
From the NI-43101 and the Mt Cattlin Stage 4 Feasibility study it has been noted that overall capital costs are at a Pre-feasibility level of confidence. Similarly, the overall cost estimation is judged to have an accuracy range of ±15% which is reflective of the level of development of the Project and is typical of a Feasibility Study.
1.18.1 | Capital Costs |
Being an operating mine capital costs are relatively modest, <10%, of the overall cost structure.
The Life-of-mine capital expenditure has been calculated to total US$80.3m, as listed below in Table 1-9. These costs are discussed in more detail in Chapter 18.
Table 1-9 – Life of mine capital expenditure summary.
Capital Type | US$m |
Site Capital | 41.1 |
Closure | 12.3 |
Mining | 5.6 |
Sustaining | 21.5 |
Total Capital Costs | 80.3 |
Variances in totals may exist due to rounding. |
Key Capital items are an allowance for:
● | US$1.4m (included in Site Capital) for a new NE In-Pit Tailings Storage Facility (IPTSF) as the current SE IPTSF will reach capacity in 2024, |
● | US$35m (included in Site Capital) has been allowed for the construction of a flotation circuit attached to the existing DMS processing plant, to facilitate the retreatment of the 900,000 t of pre-2018 tailings at the end of the mine life. |
● | US$17.7m (included in Sustaining Capital) for removing tailings from the 2SW pit that was previously used for in pit tailings disposal, as it lies adjacent to the proposed pit development. |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
1.18.2 | Operating Costs |
Operating costs were derived from operating experience, and Mt Cattlin’s budget forecasts, in the case of Processing, and General and Administration costs. In respect of Mining costs, these were sourced from a detailed negotiated tender for the mining activities. Operating costs for processing and general and administration are shown in Table 1-10..
Based off historical actual operating data, processing costs a total of US$29.12/t when operating at nameplate capacity.
Table 1-10 – Key processing cost assumptions.
Assumption | Unit | Value |
Concentrate Transport | ||
Surface Haulage Costs | US$/wmt concentrate trucked | 25.57 |
Port Costs | US$/wmt concentrate shipped | 14.06 |
Moisture | % | 2 |
Processing | ||
Fixed | US$/month | 2,184,000 |
Variable | US$/t ore processed | 14.56 |
General and Administration (G&A) | ||
Fixed | US$/month | 1,018,500 |
Royalty | ||
LRC Royalty | US$/t ore processed | 1.05 |
Western Australian State | % | 5 |
Direct mining costs are from the negotiated schedule of rates from the preferred tenderer (of five submissions) for the Stage 4 mining works.
The operating costs are based on the following assumptions:
● | Ramp up to a maximum 12 M BCM a year mining rate. |
● | Open pit mining services provided by the selected mining contractor. |
● | Fixed and variable contract. Variable costs are calculated as a function of the relevant variable. |
Resourcing levels vary as new deposits come online in the project. Mining maintenance, staff and safety personnel numbers change with each phase of the operation.
The open pit load and haul cost (ore plus waste) averaged US$6.27/BCM of total pit production.
The overall drill and blast unit cost across all volume moved equated to US$2.94/BCM using rates generated by the open pit contractor.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Total operating expenditure over the life of the project is US$$899 m. The annual expenditure by year, including Capex and Royalties is shown in the chart below, Figure 1-7.
Figure 1-7 – Annual expenditure by year.
1.19 | Economic Analysis |
Mt Cattlin produces spodumene and tantalite concentrates for sale. The concentrate revenue in this analysis has been modelled on a Realized Price basis (i.e., net of all penalties and/or grade discounts, Free-on-board Esperance, WA) using a table of prices provided by Allkem for this assessment.
The price assumptions used in the analysis are at a discount to Li2O forecasts by Wood Mackenzie and forecasts are shown in Table 1-11.
Table 1-11 – Pricing forecast by year.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Modelling was conducted on a real (non-escalated) ungeared basis.
The majority of Mt Cattlin’s costs are incurred in Australian Dollars (AUD), the analysis is shown in US$ with an exchange rate of 0.70 AUD/USD used.
Taxation has been modelled as the Australian corporate tax rate of 30% and state royalties applied to the economic analysis.
The economic analysis and NPV10 is estimated from 1 July 2023 and a summary of the economic analysis is provided in Table 1-12 below.
Table 1-12 – Summary of economic analysis.
Description | Value |
Revenue from concentrate (US$m) | 2,092 |
Total operating costs over the LOM (life of mine US$m) | 899 |
Total site costs over LOM (US$m) | 979 |
C1 cash operating cost (US$m) | 788 |
All in sustaining cash cost (US$m) | 932 |
LOM net cash flow (undiscounted US$m) | 1,113 |
LOM post tax cashflow (undiscounted US$m) | 760 |
The pre-tax NPV using a discount rate of 10% (US$m) | 947 |
The post-tax NPV using a discount rate of 10% (US$m) | 614 |
The pre-tax NPV using a discount rate of 8% (US$m) | 975 |
The post-tax NPV using a discount rate of 8% (US$m) | 638 |
Average Spodumene price over LOM (US/dmt) | 2,271 |
Average Tantalite price over LOM (US/lbs.) | 24.3 |
Operations are modelled from July 2023 through to November 2028 and produce 916kt of Li2O concentrates and 1.6Mlbs of Ta205 in concentrates which are sold for US$2,092m. Spodumene concentrate sales account for 99.5% of the revenues.
All in cash costs are US$979m, free, before tax, cashflows total US$1,113m, post-tax cashflows US$760m.
The pre-tax NPV of the project, using the supplied economic assumptions from 1 July 2023 is US$947m. Post tax NPV is US$614m.
As an existing operation, the project has no construction or pre-production period.
All pit stages and years of operation are cashflow positive, the final year of operations treating the stockpiles is also cashflow positive.
The summary annual cashflows are shown below in Table 1-13.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Table 1-13 – Summary of annual cashflows.
The third year of operations, being year ending June 30, 2026, is the only year showing a negative cashflow, resulting from low revenues and ore feed during the year whilst high waste movement continues in NW Stage 4-2. The negative cashflows in this year could be comfortably funded by high cashflows from prior years and the total Stage 4-2 is demonstrated to have a positive overall cashflow.
Sensitivity testing shows that the project NPV remains positive under testing, including:
● | 20% increases in mining or processing costs. |
● | 20% decline in revenues (prices), or processing recovery. |
● | 20% adverse move in the AUD:USD exchange rate. |
Being an operating mine capital costs are modest, being less than 10% of the overall cost structure, and relatively immaterial to the overall project economics.
1.20 | Adjacent Properties |
Mt Cattlin is the major lithium and tantalum deposit in the Ravensthorpe region and Allkem hold the immediate adjacent exploration tenements surrounding the current mining lease. There are no other lithium operations within the Ravensthorpe area. Bulletin Resources is exploring for lithium 12km SW of Mt Cattlin and has successfully delineated newly documented spodumene bearing pegmatites.
Numerous companies are actively exploring the area for copper-gold mineralization or nickel sulfide mineralization and there is an open pit nickel mine and processing plant operated by First Quantum Minerals to the South of Ravensthorpe.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
1.21 | Interpretations and Conclusions |
Detailed financial modelling performed for the feasibility study, including operating and capital cost updates during 2023 to reflect the current market conditions, were used to demonstrate the viability of the Project. As a brownfields operational site, Mt Cattlin has historic operating performance parameters which were referenced, along with updated geological and metallurgical data in the reserve evaluation documented by this report in the evaluation of this Report. The result of the economic modelling demonstrates that the Project’s financial viability is robust. Therefore, the Mineral Reserves have reasonable economic viability under S-K 1300 guidelines.
The reserves have been generated within three pit stages in the NW area: Stage 3, Stage 4-1 and Stage 4-2 open pits, and Stockpiles.
The Project is at advanced-staged production and has demonstrated operational performance history, tenure and permitting within the project area and the majority of the required infrastructure in-situ.
A series of permits will be required to access the reserves, a Mining Proposal has been submitted to DMIRS for Stage 4-1, a further Mining Proposal will be required to permit the use of IPTSF at the NE Pit and another A further Mining Proposal and EPA approval would be required for Stage 4-2 due to expansion of the NE waste dump and consequent vegetation clearing, requiring additional base line surveys.
Presently the permitting of, and preparation of, the Northeast Pit for receiving tailings, and provision of water for processing once this source of water is affected are considered risks to the production schedule.
Allkem commenced an underground feasibility in May 2023 to examine alternate access to the resources outside of the Stage 4-1. Limited metallurgical test work has been conducted on the NW pit areas, however the operating history, including recent history in NW Stage 3 pit, combined with geometallurgical understanding supports using historic recovery assumptions for the Stage 4 reserves A further program involving the drilling of a further four holes has been completed, however results were not available at the time of the feasibility study.
The only environmental liability associated with the project is closure costs, these are estimated at US$12.3M.
1.22 | Recommendations |
The following recommendations have been made to Allkem with respect to the Mt Cattlin project.
● | Complete drilling to source alternative water supply and subsequent permitting for processing operations to provide alternate processing to water to that currently sourced from the NE Pit, which is scheduled for use as IPTSF in 2024. This source of water remains a key project risk. until alternate source of water is available. |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
● | Evaluate the results of the 4 additional metallurgical drillholes and associated testing to quantify the continuity of the mineralization and recovery expectations for the bulk of the Stage 4 expansion. |
● | Conduct further metallurgical and geotechnical drilling to enhance understanding and support an underground studies. |
● | Continue permitting works to ensure the planned access to pit stages, waste rock storage and tailings storage facilities does not impede planned operations. |
● | Continue to evaluate the Mining Model performance against site reconciliation results. |
● | Continue to develop geo-metallurgical grade control techniques to define and segregate fine grained spodumene for future processing. Further resource estimation work, incorporating the 2023 grade control drilling should investigate fine grade pegmatite with lithia grade above cut-off, for either end of mine processing or blending into ore grade stockpiles to maintain process plant nameplate run rates while meeting product specifications. |
● | Continue resource drilling to further expand the resource and define the limits of mineralization. |
● | Investigate underground mining methods as an alternative to open pit mining as the strip ratio increases and analyze a tradeoff between open pit and underground mining transition. |
● | Examine the potential to re-commission the crushing circuit, given the mine life supported by the feasibility, and discontinue the use of contract crushing currently being used. |
● | Develop program for routine grade control programs in place ahead of mining activities. |
● | Progress the business case for processing the potential low grade fine grained spodumene. |
● | Further expand the current study level of the tailings re-treatment to sure up processing and support forecast capital expenditure of additional floatation cells to process the tailings. |
● | The current site power supply of multiple diesel fueled generators, while fit for purpose, is relatively expensive and has comparatively large carbon emissions compared to similar sized alternative fuel power sources. A project to replace or supplement the current plant with a hybrid natural gas / renewable energy installation is underway, with an expected timeline of 12-15 months. |
● | To consolidate the Mt Cattlin workforce and reduce the reliance on multiple third-party accommodation sources, Allkem have commenced the process of constructing their own accommodation village for Allkem staff and primary contractors. The village has had a Development Approval application submitted, a tender for the accommodation and central facility modules let, and planning for utilities and construction has commenced. |
● | Finalize the methodology and time required, and then schedule the extraction and redeposition of tailings from the 2SW pit to not impact on the NW Stage 4 pits schedule. |
● | The current tax model within the economic analysis is high level, and if additional economic analysis is required development of a more detailed tax model should be considered. |
● | Future economic modelling should consider the opportunity to process Stockpile Reserves when there is mill capacity available. |
The remainder of the program is to be carried out as per normal operational execution.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
2. Introduction
Allkem Limited (Allkem or The Company) is dual listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX). Allkem has previously reported its operations under the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (the JORC Code) published by the Australian Joint Mineral Reserve Committee (the JORC Committee) as well as to the National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) the Standards and Disclosure for Mineral Projects within Canada.
In addition to its reporting obligations pursuant to the Australian and Canadian jurisdictions, Allkem has commissioned Mining Plus Pty Ltd. (Mining Plus), alongside an Alkem employee, to prepare an S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary (this Report) on the Mt Cattlin Lithium Project (the Project) in Western Australia, an operating lithium mine and processing operation. This Report will comply with sub-part 229.1300 – Disclosure by Registrants engaged in Mining Operations of Regulation S-K (S-K 1300) as required for registrants with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
This is the first S-K 1300 Technical Summary Report filed by Allkem on the Mt Cattlin Lithium Project.
The Mt Cattlin Project is 100% held by Galaxy Lithium Australia Pty Ltd (Galaxy) a wholly owned subsidiary of Allkem.
2.1 | Terms of Reference and Purpose of the Report |
This Report was prepared by Mining Plus and the Allkem employee set forth herein.
This report supports Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves estimates using the standards and definitions in the S-K 1300 requirements. It presents the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates, and capital and operating costs. An economic assessment is based on open pit mining operations with on-site processing to produce spodumene and tantalite concentrates.
The Report covers the extent of the Mt Cattlin Operation, owned by Galaxy Resources a wholly owned subsidiary of Allkem and is solely concerned with the Mt Cattlin asset.
All units of measurement in this Report are metric unless otherwise stated.
The monetary units are US dollars, unless listed otherwise. Where not stated US dollars should be assumed.
An exchange rate of AUD 1.0:USD 0.7 has been used in any conversions which were required to be made.
2.2 | Qualified Persons |
Table 2-1 lists the individuals who acted as Qualified Persons (QPs) in preparing this Report.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Table 2-1 – Lists the individuals who acted as Qualified Persons (QPs) in preparing this Report.
Qualified Person | Report Responsibilities | Report Sections |
Employees of Mining Plus Pty Ltd. | Property Description & Location, Project History, Mineral Reserve Estimate, Mining Methods, Mine Design, Production Scheduling, Mining Cost Estimates, Metallurgical Testwork and Mineral Processing. | ● Chapters 1, 2, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24 and 25. |
Albert Thamm, F.Aus.IMM | History, Geology & Mineralization, Exploration, Sample Preparation/Analysis and Security, Data Verification, Mineral Resource Estimate and Adjacent Properties. |
● Geological, Mineral Resource and environmental aspects of chapters 1, 2, 10, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25. ● Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 15, 17, 20 and 21
|
Mining Plus has been involved with the Project since 2021. It has been the consulting geologists and mining engineers for the Project through the delivery of the 2021 Mineral Resource Estimate and the 2023 Mineral Resource Estimate. Mining Plus, and its personnel, have extensive experience in lithium and similar mineralization styles, the proposed and operational mining operations at the project and other similar projects. All Mining Plus QPs to this report are full-time employees of Mining Plus and are not employees of or otherwise affiliated with Allkem.
Mr. Thamm, B.Sc. (Hons)., M.Sc. F.Aus.IMM, a is a full-time employee of Allkem Limited and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a QP.
Allkem is satisfied that the QPs meet the qualifying criteria under 17 CFR 229.1300.
2.3 | Site Visits |
A Mining Plus QP visited the site in July 2022. During this visit, the engineer inspected the property, surface topography, areas proposed for the open pit, waste rock dumps, and mine infrastructure.
Additionally, a Mining Plus QP visited the site in June 2022, who during this visit examined drill cores across a range of lithologies, including ore and waste rock.
Mr. Thamm has visited the site numerous times since 2006, being involved with and present for the drilling programs associated with developing the Mineral Resource Estimates for the Project. Mr. Thamm has personally inspected much of the core and RC chips from the Project. In addition, Mr. Thamm oversaw the logging and assaying of the geological samples.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
2.4 | Currency of Report |
The report is current for work completed until 30 June 2023, when Allkem released the Mt Cattlin Ore Reserve to the Australian Stock Exchange and the current Stage 4 Expansion Feasibility Study Technical Report, dated June 2023 provided to Mining Plus by Allkem.
2.5 | Sources of Information |
Mining Plus and the Allkem employee set forth herein have compiled this report from information provided by Allkem in which the key data sources include:
● | Mt Cattlin Stage 4 Expansion Feasibility Study where Allkem engaged Entech to prepare a feasibility study into the open pit mining of resources in the NW area. The feasibility was dated 09 August 2023, effective 30 June 2023. |
● | The NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mt Cattlin Spodumene project compiled by Entech dated 16 August 2023 and reporting on the resources and reserves as 30 June 2023. Report Effective Date 30 June 2023 |
● | NI 43-101 report on Mt Cattlin Spodumene project compiled by Mining Plus reporting resources and reserves as of 31 March 2023. |
● | Clarifications and Information updates provided to Mining Plus in respect of Environmental Summary, Metallurgical testwork from Allkem, Strategic Metallurgy and Mining and Economic Modelling from Entech. This information was relied upon by Mining Plus to complete the Mineral Reserve evaluation with respect to environmental permitting and water availability, the metallurgical testwork and processing sections and the economic analysis sections respectively. |
Reports and documents listed in Chapter 24.0 were used to support the preparation of the Report. Source information was provided by Allkem where required, which was prepared by the range of consultants and companies listed in Chapter 24.0.
2.6 | Previous Reports |
Previous reports published on the ASX platform by Allkem and relevant to the current iteration of the Mt Cattlin Operation can be found at www.allkem.co and include those listed in Table 2-2.
Table 2-2 – ASX Reports.
Date | Title |
16-Jun-23 | Mt Cattlin Ore Reserve update confirms mine life extension |
17-Apr-23 | Mt Cattlin Resource Update with Higher Grade |
21-Feb-23 | Mt Cattlin Production Update |
05-Oct-22 | Mt Cattlin Resource Drilling Update |
25-Aug-22 | Mt Cattlin Resource, Reserve and Operations Update |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
2.7 | Abbreviations and Acronyms |
A list of unit abbreviations used in this Report is provided in Table 2-3. Chemical and elemental symbols and associated acronyms are described in Table 2-4 and all other acronyms and abbreviations used in this report, along with their meanings are provided in Table 2-5.
Table 2-3 – Units of Measure.
Unit of Measurement | Description |
% | Per cent |
µm | Micrometer (one millionth of a Meter) |
BCM | Banked cubic meter |
CY | Calendar Year |
dmt | Dry metric tonne |
g/t | Grams per tonne |
H1 | 1st half of year 1 |
Ha | Hectares (area) |
kg/m3 | Kilograms per Meter cubed |
kL | Kiloliter (thousand liters) |
km | Kilometer |
Km/hr. | Kilometer per hour |
l/s | Liters per second |
lb. | Pound |
m | Meter |
m3/d | Cubic meter per day |
mg/L | Milligram per liter |
mm | Millimeter (one thousandth of a meter) |
Mt | Million metric tonnes |
Mtpa | Million tonnes per annum |
MW | Megawatt (Power) |
oC | Degrees Celsius |
p.a. | Per annum |
t | Metric tonne |
tpa | Tonnes per annum |
wmt | Wet metric tonne |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Table 2-4 – Chemicals, elements, and associated abbreviations.
Abbreviation | Mineral or Element |
Al | Aluminum |
H | Hydrogen |
K | Potassium |
LFP | lithium-iron-phosphate |
Li | Lithium |
Li2O | Lithium oxide |
LiAl(F,OH)PO4 | Amblygonite |
LiAl(SiQ3)2 | Spodumene |
Mg | magnesium |
MHO | mixed hydroxide |
Na | Sodium |
NCA | Nickel-cobalt-aluminum oxide |
NCM | Nickel-cobalt-manganese oxide |
O | Oxygen |
SI | Silica |
Ta | Tantalum |
Ta2O5 | Tantalum oxide |
TaO5 | Tantalite |
Table 2-5 – Acronyms and Abbreviations.
Abbreviation | Unit or Term |
US$B | Billion US dollars |
US$m | Million US dollars |
AEP | Annual Exceedance Probability |
AHD | Above Height Datum |
ASX | Australian Stock Exchange |
AUD | Australian Dollars |
BG | Battery grade |
BH | Bore Hole |
CAGR | Compound annual growth rate |
Capex | Capital expenditure |
CCE | Closure cost estimate |
CCG | Community Consultation Group |
CIM | Canadian Institute of Mining |
CRM | Certified reference material |
CV (processing) | Conveyor |
CV (geology) | Coefficient of variation |
DMIRS | Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety |
DMS | Dense media separation |
DWER | Department of Water and Environmental Regulation |
EFL | Esperance Freight Line |
EMP | Environmental Management Plan |
ENE | East Northeast |
ESE | East Southeast |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Abbreviation | Unit or Term |
EV | Electric vehicles |
FCF | Free cash flow |
FOB | Fine Ore Bin |
FOB (shipping) | Free on board |
FOS | Fine Ore Stockpile |
FPB | Flood protection bund |
FS | Feasibility Study |
FX | Foreign exchange rate (AUD:USD) |
G & A | General and Administration |
GST | Goods and Services Tax |
IPTSF | In pit tailings storage facility |
JORC | Joint Ore Reserve Committee |
LCE | Lithium Carbonate Equivalent |
LOM | Life of Mine |
mE | Meters east |
mN | Meters north |
MRE | Mineral Resource Estimate |
mRL | Meters Relative Level |
NE | Northeast |
NI 43-101 | National Instrumentation Standard 43-101 |
NPV | Net Present Value |
NW | northwest |
Opex | Operating Expenditure |
OREAS | Ore Research and Exploration |
PMF | probable Maximum Flood |
PMP | probable Maximum precipitation |
ppm | parts per million |
ppm | parts per million |
QA/QC | Quality Assurance/Quality Control |
QP | Qualified Person |
RC | Reverse circulation |
ROM | Run of Mine |
RPEEE | Reasonable Prospect of Eventual Economic Extraction |
SE | southeast |
TDS | Total dissolvable solids |
TG | Technical grade |
TSF | Tailings Storage Facility |
TSX | Toronto Stock Exchange |
UFSMS | Ultrafine dens media separation |
USA | United States of America |
US$ | US Dollars |
VSI | Vertical shaft impactor |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Abbreviation | Unit or Term |
W.A. | Western Australia |
WD | Waste dump |
WIMS | Wet high intensity magnetic separator |
WMC | Western Mining Corporation |
WNW | west northwest |
WRL | Waste Rock Landform |
WSW | West southwest |
XRD | X-ray diffraction |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
3. Property Description
3.1 | Property Location |
The Mt Cattlin operation is located two kilometers north of the town of Ravensthorpe in the Great Southern region of Western Australia approximately 450km southeast of Perth (Figure 3-1). The nearest regional centers proximal to Ravensthorpe are Albany, 255 km to the southwest and the port of Esperance is 175 km to the east.
Mt Cattlin operation was commissioned in 2010 and operated for three years before being put into care and maintenance in 2013. The operation re-started in 2016 and has been operating continuously since, providing spodumene concentrate into the international lithium market.
Figure 3-1 – Location map of Mt Cattlin.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
3.2 | Mineral Rights |
The current operation is situated on M74/244 as shown Figure 3-2 along with Allkem’s greater regional tenement suite, shown in Figure 3-3.
Mt Cattlin is an operating mine, and the NW pit development is the fifth separate open pit to be developed. The underlying land ownership tenure in the district is a mixture of freehold title and Crown Land.
The greater project area comprises one mining lease, one general purpose lease, four miscellaneous licenses, four prospecting licenses and eleven exploration licenses. In Western Australian tenements are permitted by the Department of Mines, Industry, Regulation and Safety (DMIRS). Mining leases are issued for 21 years, then renewable, as are miscellaneous and general-purpose licenses.
Prospecting licenses are generally issued for 8 years. Exploration licenses are issued for 5 years, renewable once, thereafter 2-year extension of terms if justified by reasonable progress.
Allkem is the freehold title owner of several Torrens title land lots that underly the mine site or are adjacent to it. In areas of freehold ownership, Native Title is extinguished. All tenements are subject to an existing Indigenous Land Use Agreement in terms of the Noongar Boodja settlement between the West Australian government and the Noongar native title claimants which applies to the South-Western part of Western Australia.
The operating site holds as a Prescribed Premises License for the processing facility of 2.0 million tonne design capacity, as well as other permitted discharges, issued by the Department of Water and Environment Protection (DWER). Other licensed infrastructure, (site power, water bores, tails dams) are licensed by other WA government agencies.
The local government area is the Shire of Ravensthorpe.
Tenement titles, area, and expiry dates tabulated in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1 – Tenement titles including area and expiry dates.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Tenement ID | Current Area | Area Unit | Expiry Date |
E74/0713 | 14 | SB | 4/26/2027 |
L74/0046 | 10 | HA | 3/17/2031 |
L74/0047 | 1,580 | HA | 12/13/2032 |
L74/0048 | 5 | HA | 3/15/2033 |
M74/0244 | 1,830 | HA | 12/23/2030 |
P74/0370 | 20 | HA | 3/21/2025 |
P74/0371 | 67 | HA | 3/21/2025 |
P74/0372 | 24 | HA | 2/22/2025 |
P74/0373 | 95 | HA | 3/21/2025 |
G74/13 | 63 | HA | 5/24/2044 |
L74/61 | 23 | HA | 27/07/2044 |
HA: Metric Hectares | |||
SB: Sub Block - 2,892 m3 |
Figure 3-2 – Location of granted exploration licenses, prospecting licenses, and mining leases in the Ravensthorpe area.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Allkem maintains an active portfolio of exploration and prospecting licenses that surround the main mining lease M74/244 which incorporates all the company’s current Mineral Resources, mining, and processing facilities in the Ravensthorpe region.
In 2006 Galaxy acquired mining tenement M74/12 from the administrators of Sons of Gwalia Limited. In early 2009, Galaxy was granted Mining Leases M74/155 and M74/182 which adjoin Mt Cattlin. The two new mining leases were contiguous with M74/12 and enabled the company to proceed with further exploration, extension drilling and infrastructure development of the original pegmatite resource base.
In 2010, Galaxy consolidated several mining and prospecting leases into a single mining lease nominated as M74/244. The M74/244 tenement has a lease area of 1830 Ha and was granted on 24 December 2009 and will expire on 23 December 2030. Allkem owns 100% of M74/244 and maintains freehold title of land subject to current mining operations and the plant site.
Figure 3-3 – Location of granted exploration licenses, prospecting licenses, and mining leases in the Ravensthorpe area.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
In 2020 Galaxy entered into an agreement with former joint venture partner Traka Resources regarding exploration access to specific tenements north of Mt Cattlin. Traka Resources had previously held a 20% free carried interest in tenements E74/401, P74/370 and P74/373, however under a revised agreement, Traka Resources hold 100% of the gold and copper rights, whereas Allkem hold the lithium and tantalum rights.
3.3 | Description of Operations |
3.3.1 | Project History |
The Cattlin Creek pegmatites have been the subject of several drilling, sampling and metallurgical test campaigns, as well as feasibility studies dating back to the 1960s. From 1962 to 1966, Western Mining Corporation (WMC) carried out an extensive drilling program and established a resource of ‘green’ and ‘white’ spodumene.
Extensive mineralogical and metallurgical testwork was carried out as part of this program, culminating in WMC preparing an internal feasibility study on the mining and production of 10,000 t/y to 15,000 t/y of spodumene from the deposit. Since the 1960s, the tenements were owned by several companies, all of which have viewed them as a prospective tantalite resource and conducted drilling and metallurgical testwork accordingly. Galaxy acquired the tenure from the Administrators of Sons of Gwalia in November 2006 (via a predecessor company) and in 2009, construction began of mining and plant facilities at the site and in June 2010 mining activities started.
The mine was placed into care and maintenance in 2013, production was restarted in March 2016 and has been continual since then.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 3-4 – Mt Cattlin and the Town of Ravensthorpe.
Figure 3-4 shows the site and proximity to the Town of Ravensthorpe, as well as the key Mining Tenement M74/244, and the main South Coast Highway.
3.3.2 | Operating Model |
Mt Cattlin utilizes a contract miner to carry out all the drilling, blasting, excavating and load and haul, and ancillary functions at site. The Mt Cattlin mining owner’s team supply the management and technical direction to the mining contractor, as well as the statutory Senior Site Executive and Quarry Manager function.
3.3.3 | Infrastructure |
3.3.3.1 | Administration building |
The site has a suitable permanent administration building which the Mt Cattlin staff are based in.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
3.3.3.2 | Processing Plant |
The processing plant is nearby and consists of a crushing circuit, Optical beneficiation circuit, Dense Media Separation plant, magnetic waste separator, product handling facilities, and tailings storage facilities.
The original Mt Cattlin crushing circuit has been largely superseded by a contract crushing circuit. This was a pragmatic capital refurbishment cost choice when the operation emerged from care and maintenance in 2016. A study evaluating the business case returning to an Mt Cattlin owned crushing circuit is independently underway at the moment.
3.3.3.3 | Mining Contractor |
The mining contractor has Mt Cattlin supplied workshop and administration building located adjacent to the pit area.
3.3.3.4 | Power Supply |
The power supply is provided on a contract basis by Pacific Energy via six diesel fueled Cummins 1.25MW diesel gensets. An independent study is underway to evaluate the business case of upgrading the station to include a meaningful renewables energy penetration and switch the thermal fuel source to natural gas.
3.3.4 | Operational Overview |
3.3.4.1 | Workforce |
The Mt Cattlin operation is structured similarly to other medium sized Western Australian mines. The site is independently managed by a Senior Site Executive who will hold dual roles as the senior site company representative as well as the senior regulatory position of Senior Site Executive.
Head office / corporate support is provided in the form of:
● | Corporate management via the Executive Australia and Exploration Manager |
● | Senior support functions such as Exploration Manager, Principal Mining Engineer, Human Resources, Marketing, and Legal, and |
● | Cost accounting - accounts payable, accounts receivable, and month-end cost analysis & reporting). |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Exploration activities operate out of site and incorporate off mining tenement activities as well as on tenement and provide input into in-mine exploration.
The workforce and contracting strategy is to:
● | Directly employ and manage: |
o | All administration, compliance roles, and departmental management, including General Manager, Health & Safety, Environmental, and stores/procurement/shipping. |
o | All management, technical, operating and maintenance staff associated with the processing function, including the site laboratory. |
o | All technical functions - geology, mining, and processing |
● | Contractor supplied: |
o | Surface mining includes all supervisory, operating and maintenance personnel and associated light and heavy equipment. |
● | Specialist sustaining services such as shutdown and campaign maintenance support. |
The Mt Cattlin workforce are employed on a variety of rosters, and includes a number of local residential roles, which are encouraged by the local shire.
3.3.4.2 | Site Organizational Structure |
The site organizational structure is shown in Figure 3-5.
Figure 3-5 – Site organizational structure.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
3.3.4.3 | Site Management |
The operations workforce is under the control of the Senior Site Executive (SSE), who is supported by department heads for the various site functions.
3.3.4.4 | Administration |
Site administration duties, including flight bookings, contracts, accommodation logistics and various procurement services are handles by a small team led by a Senior Administrative Assistant who reports to the SSE.
3.3.4.5 | Health, Safety, Environment and Compliance |
The Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) functions are managed by a HSEC Manager with senior environmental and safety advisors as functional leaders, plus emergency response and security roles. The HSE Manager reports to the SSE on site.
3.3.4.6 | Mining |
The Mining Manager is responsible for managing the mining contractor and Mt Cattlin’s technical team, including the mine planning and site geology function. The Mining Manager also fulfills the statutory role of Quarry Manager.
3.3.4.7 | Processing |
The Processing and Metallurgy group is responsible for the operational and technical management of the process plant and quality control of the processing facility. The organizational chart shows the position of Process Manager reporting directly to the SSE, supported by a Process Superintendent, as well as a Principal Metallurgist reporting directly to the. SSE. The Process Plant is manned by crews on a four-panel rotating roster, as well as an onsite laboratory team.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
3.3.4.8 | Exploration |
The Exploration activities are managed by the Exploration Manager who is based out of the Perth head office. He is responsible for managing the exploration geologists, as well as planning and coordinating the various ongoing drilling programs.
3.4 | Environmental Liability |
The only environmental liability that Allkem is aware of in relation to the property are closure and rehabilitation costs, a substantive part of rehabilitation requirements will to be met during operations where possible, but otherwise closure costs are estimated at US$12.3M in the currently submitted Mining Proposal. Mt Cattlin’s Closure Plan for the current works work has been approved by Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (“DMIRS”).
3.5 | Royalty Payments |
Royalties apply to the production of spodumene and are payable to the Western Australian (WA) State Government. The royalty is applied at a rate of 5% on the revenue realized from the sale of spodumene concentrate.
A royalty payment of US$1.05 per tonne of ore crushed is paid to Lithium Royalty Corp.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
4. Accessibility, Climate, Physiography, Local Resources, and Infrastructure
4.1 | Accessibility and Infrastructure |
The Mt Cattlin site is serviced by existing infrastructure, including sealed roads to site. Albany and Esperance, the two nearest major centers of population, both have heavy industry support including construction, engineering and manufacturing and production services.
4.1.1 | Road Access |
The Mt Cattlin site is serviced by Main Roads highways to Perth via the Brookton Highway and Albany Highway and is accessible to both Albany and Perth via the South Coast Highway. The South Coast Highway crosses the southern section of the Mt Cattlin Mining Lease M74/244. The road network is a sealed highway and suitable for both heavy and light vehicles to enable servicing of the site.
4.1.2 | Air Access |
Albany and Esperance have regional airports serviced by regular commercial flights to Perth, a major international airport. Ravensthorpe also has a 1.6km long all weather airstrip.
4.1.3 | Port Access |
Perth, Albany, and Esperance each have export and import port facilities, with Mt Cattlin spodumene product currently shipped through Esperance. The location of Mt Cattlin is shown in Figure 4-1 relative to regional population centers.
Spodumene concentrate from Mt Cattlin is trucked by a haulage contractor (Qube Logistics) to Esperance Port, owned by Southern Ports, where it is stockpiled at a Qube facility prior to ship loading. Ships are contracted on a spot basis as required via shipping agent who coordinates shipping activities with Mt Cattlin, the vessel’s owner, and the Esperance Port.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 4-1 – Mt Cattlin location map.
4.2 | Climate |
The Ravensthorpe area has a Mediterranean climate featuring moist, mild winters and hot, dry summers. The mean annual rainfall is 429 mm, and around 75% of the rainfall occurs between March and October. The highest daily recorded rainfall is 112.8 mm and there are on average 74 rain days per year.
The mean annual maximum daily temperature is 22.8°C and mean annual minimum daily temperature is 10.5°C. Daily maximum above 30°C are common from December to February. There are notable diurnal temperature variations that occur throughout the year.
The average wind speeds vary throughout the year from 10.2 to 19.3 km/h in the morning and from 12.1 to 16.3 km/h in the afternoon. In this climatic region, the annual evaporation greatly exceeds the mean annual rainfall.
The climate is typical of the southwest portion of Western Australian and there are no significant operational constraints from the climate at Mt Cattlin.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
4.3 | Physiography |
The Mt Cattlin pegmatite deposit is located 2 km north of the township of Ravensthorpe. The has an undulating topography, with a maximum elevation within the mining footprint of 265 m above sea level.
The Mt Cattlin Creek passes through the project area and separates the deposit into the eastern and western mining areas. Approved work on diverting the creek has been completed to enable mining access to the northeast and southeast areas of the deposit.
In the region, much of the land has been cleared for grain and livestock production, including most of the land at Mt Cattlin. An area of remnant vegetation has been previously cleared to facilitate mining of the eastern sections of the Mt Cattlin deposit.
4.4 | Availability of Key Supplies |
4.4.1 | Personnel |
Western Australia has a large mining community on which draw skilled employees, Mt Cattlin’s work force including key contractors draws predominantly from this pool, including a number who are resident in the nearby area including the Ravensthorpe town.
4.4.2 | Power |
The power supply is provided on a contract basis by Pacific Energy via six diesel fueled Cummins 1.25MW diesel gensets. An independent study is underway to evaluate the business case of upgrading the station to include a meaningful renewables energy penetration and switch the thermal fuel source to natural gas.
4.4.3 | Major Supplies |
Diesel (fuel) supply is transported by trucks from Albany or Esperance. Explosives and related supplies transported from Perth or Kalgoorlie).
Water for dust suppression in the mining operation is sourced from bores at site.
Site process water is currently sourced from the “mined out” North-East Pit, an alternate water source will be required when the pit is converted to tailings storage. A drilling testing program to identify this source is currently underway. Availability and Permitting of the water supply is a recommendation and risk for the project.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
5. History
5.1 | Current Ownership |
The Mt Cattlin operation is wholly owned by Allkem Limited, via subsidiaries Galaxy Resources Pty Ltd and Galaxy Lithium Australia Pty Ltd.
Allkem Ltd is a public company with dual listings on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) (ticker AKE).
The corporate headquarters are in Argentina and Australian headquarters are in Brisbane. A regional Western Australian head office is in Applecross, Perth. Allkem are operating and development projects in Argentina, Australia, Japan, and Canada. The corporate structure relevant to Mt Cattlin is show in Figure 5-1.
Figure 5-1 – Mt Cattlin Corporate Ownership Structure.
5.2 | Ownership History |
The tenements that incorporate Mt Cattlin have been held by numerous companies since the 1960’s, including Western Mining Corporation (WMC), Pancontinental Mining Limited, Greenstone Resources NL, Haddington Resources Limited (Haddington) and Sons of Gwalia Limited. Galaxy Resources NL acquired M74/12 from the administrators of Sons of Gwalia Limited in November 2006.
Allkem Ltd acquired Galaxy Resources in 2021.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
5.3 | Mining History of the Area |
The pegmatites which host the Mt Cattlin orebody were first reported in 1843. The Ravensthorpe area was originally known as the Phillips River Goldfield following the discovery of small quantities of gold in association with copper and pyrite. The township of Ravensthorpe was surveyed in 1900 and gazetted in 1901 at which time 15 mines were operating. A total of 53 mines were listed as operating in 1903 by which time it was realized that much of the gold occurred with copper.
The first government smelter was built in 1904 on the east side of the town and a larger smelter was later erected on the Hopetoun Road in 1906, but later closed in 1918. At that time, the Phillips River Mineral Field was Western Australia’s principal copper mining center with 19,000 tonnes being produced. Gold was also recovered in the mining center, a total of 83,942 ounces of gold was recovered from copper mines with 88,220 tonnes of ore recovered from auriferous quartz reefs.
The population of the Ravensthorpe goldfield peaked in 1911 when there were more than 2,000 people in the area.
The Cattlin Creek pegmatites have been the subject of several drilling, sampling, and metallurgical test campaigns as well as feasibility studies dating back to the 1960s. During the period 1962 to 1966, WMC carried out an extensive drilling program and established a resource of green and white spodumene, which is the lithium bearing mineral associated with the pegmatite.
Extensive mineralogical and metallurgical test work was carried out as part of this program, culminating in WMC preparing an internal feasibility study on the mining and production of 10,000 tpa to 15,000 tpa of spodumene concentrate from the deposit on Mining Lease M74/12.
Since the 1960s, the tenements have been owned by several companies, all of whom have viewed them as a prospective tantalite resource and conducted drilling and metallurgical test work accordingly. Major evaluation programs included the following:
● | Pancontinental Mining Limited, July 1989, 101 Reverse circulation (RC) drillholes, |
● | Pancontinental Mining Limited, 1990, additional 21 RC drillholes, |
● | Greenstone Resources NL, 1997, 3 diamond drillholes, 38 RC drillholes and soil sampling, which comprised 23 by 44-gallon drums of freshly blasted mineralized material that was sent to the Nagrom mineral processing facility (based in Kelmscott, W.A.) for crushing, screening, and gravity separation testing, |
● | Haddington Resources Limited, 2001, 9 diamond drillholes for metallurgical test work, and additional RC drillholes for in-fill and sterilization. |
Galaxy Resources acquired M74/12 from the administrators of Sons of Gwalia Limited in November 2006. By 2010, Galaxy had established an open pit mine and processing facilities to exploit the 12 million tonnes of ore at a grade of 1.0% Li2O over a planned 13-to-14-year mine life.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
The mine was placed under care and maintenance in 2013. Galaxy restarted mine production during March 2016. In 2021 Galaxy merged with Orocobre and formed Allkem, who wholly owns Galaxy Lithium and Mt Cattlin.
Records of the spodumene concentrate production at Mt Cattlin are presented in Table 5-1.
Table 5-1 – Spodumene concentrate production from 2010 to 2020.
Year | Concentrate Produced (dmt) |
2022 | 107,417 |
2021 | 127,717 |
2020 | 108,658 |
2019 | 191,570 |
2018 | 156,689 |
2017 | 155,679 |
2016 | 9,700 |
2015 | - |
2014 | - |
2013 | - |
2012 | 54,047 |
2011 | 63,863 |
2010 | 1,645 |
The 2020 production year was moderated due to market conditions and a total of 1,086,364 wet metric tonnes (wmt) of ore was processed at a head grade of 1.1% Li2O to produce 108,658 dry metric tonnes (dmt) of spodumene concentrate at a grade of 5.95% Li2O. In early 2021, operations at Mt Cattlin were again ramped up to full rate (2019 rate) in response to improving spodumene prices. Galaxy is now targeting the annual production of 185,000 dmt to 210,000 dmt of spodumene concentrate. Improved prices for spodumene concentrate have prevailed from January 2022 onwards.
Mining at Mt Cattlin is conducted by conventional drill, blast, truck, and shovel methods. Processing is by conventional crushing, optical sort, multi-pass dense medium separation (DMS), de-sliming and mica removal. Spodumene is concentrated to greater than 5.5% Li2O. The DMS pre-screen undersize (-0.5 mm) is treated by gravity and spiral classifiers to produce a tantalite concentrate. Optical sorters are utilized post crushing to preferentially sort and remove dark contaminant country rock to produce a cleaner feed for subsequent spodumene recovery. A magnetic sorter, to further improve and remove waste meta-basalt was constructed and deployed in 2022.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
5.4 | Historical Mineral Resource Estimates |
During the 1960s WMC completed drilling campaigns, metallurgical studies, and feasibility studies to establish an initial spodumene resource covering part of the eastern portion of the current orebody. The completed WMC internal feasibility study was based on operations producing 10,000 to 15,000 tpa of spodumene concentrate.
In 2001, consultant’s Hellman and Schofield completed a resource estimate for the tantalum mineralization which covered a small portion in the northeast of the current orebody. This work was completed for Galaxy Resources NL, before the company listed on the ASX. The first significant published Galaxy Mineral Resource estimate that included an estimate of the Li2O resources was reported to the ASX in December 2007.
The tabulated maiden Mineral Resource is provided in Table 5-2.
Table 5-2 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource, Hellman & Schofield (December 2007).
Mineral Resource December 2007 | |||
Resource | Tonnes | Li2O% | Ta2O5 ppm |
Measured | 1,090,066 | 1.07 | 177 |
Indicated | 6,417,133 | 1.02 | 125 |
Inferred | 4,797,911 | 0.96 | 140 |
Total | 12,305,110 | 1.00 | 135 |
Note: Li2O cut-off grade - 0.4% Li2O. Mineral Resource Estimate compiled by Mr. Rob Spiers of Hellman & Schofield. |
Mineral Resource updates were also completed in May 2009 and December 2009. The December 2009 results are detailed in Table 5-3.
Table 5-3 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource, Hellman & Schofield (December 2009).
Mineral Resource December 2009 | |||
Resource | Tonnes | Li2O % | Ta2O5 ppm |
Measured | 2,672,000 | 1.17 | 150 |
Indicated | 9,629,000 | 1.09 | 171 |
Inferred | 3,575,000 | 1.00 | 145 |
Total | 15,875,000 | 1.08 | 161 |
Note: Li2O cut-off grade - 0.4% Li2O. The Mineral Resource Estimate was compiled by Mr. Rob Spiers of Hellman & Schofield. |
Galaxy commissioned Mining Plus to prepare an updated Mineral Resource estimate toward the end of 2017, which was reported to the ASX in March 2018, (Table 5-4).
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Table 5-4 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource, Mining Plus (December 2017).
MRE December 2017 | |||||
Material | Tonnes | Li2O% | Ta2O5 ppm | Fe2O3% | Li2O Metal Tonnes |
Measured In situ | 1,740,000 | 1.21 | 196 | 1.26 | 21,000 |
Indicated In Situ | 6,210,000 | 1.26 | 127 | 1.19 | 78,200 |
Inferred In Situ | 2,350,000 | 1.25 | 181 | 1.31 | 29,400 |
Total In Situ | 10,300,000 | 1.25 | 151 | 1.23 | 128,600 |
Measured Stockpiles | 140,000 | 0.98 | NA | NA | 1,400 |
Indicated Stockpiles | 1,180,000 | 0.81 | NA | NA | 9,600 |
Total Stockpiles | 1,320,000 | 0.83 | 0 | 11,000 | |
Grand Total | 11,620,000 | 1.20 | 139,600 | ||
Note: Fresh material has been reported at a cut-off grade of 0.4% Li2O. All tonnages are reported as dry metric tonnes. Minor discrepancies may occur due to rounding. |
Galaxy published an updated Mineral Resource undertaken by Mining Plus in August 2018, which was depleted for mining to 1 June 2018, (Table 5-5).
Table 5-5 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource, Mining Plus (June 2018).
MRE June 2018 | |||||
Material | Tonnes | Li2O% | Ta2O5 ppm | Fe2O3% | Li2O Metal Tonnes |
Measured In situ | 1,300,000 | 1.28 | 241 | 1.32 | 16,700 |
Indicated In Situ | 7,000,000 | 1.34 | 177 | 1.40 | 93,700 |
Inferred In Situ | 1,400,000 | 1.44 | 264 | 1.27 | 20,100 |
Total In Situ | 9,700,000 | 1.35 | 198 | 1.37 | 130,500 |
Measured Stockpiles | 200,000 | 0.78 | 131 | NA | 1,500 |
Indicated Stockpiles | 1,900,000 | 0.81 | 54 | NA | 15,500 |
Total Stockpiles | 2,100,000 | 0.81 | 61 | 17,000 | |
Grand Total | 11,800,000 | 1.25 | 174 | 147,500 | |
Note: Fresh material has been reported at a cut-off grade of 0.4% Li2O. All tonnages are reported as dry metric tonnes. Minor discrepancies may occur due to rounding. |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Galaxy published an updated Mineral Resource undertaken by Mining Plus in January 2019 that was depleted for mining to 31 December 2018, (Table 5-6).
Table 5-6 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource, Mining Plus (December 2018).
MRE December 2018 | |||||
Material | Tonnes | Li2O% | Ta2O5 ppm | Fe2O3% | Li2O Metal Tonnes |
Measured In Situ |
2,200,000 |
1.32 |
208 |
1.17 |
29,000 |
Indicated In Situ |
7,200,000 |
1.43 |
165 |
1.48 |
103,000 |
Inferred In Situ | 4,600,000 | 1.30 | 156 | 1.67 | 60,000 |
Total In Situ | 14,000,000 | 1.37 | 169 | 1.49 | 192,000 |
Indicated Stockpiles | 2,700,000 | 0.82 | 110 | NA | 22,000 |
Grand Total | 16,700,000 | 1.28 | 159 | 214,000 | |
Note: Fresh material has been reported at a cut-off grade of 0.4% Li2O and Transition material at 0.6% Li2O. All tonnages are reported as dry metric tonnes. Minor discrepancies may occur due to rounding. |
Subsequent published Mineral Resources, including in 2020 and 2021, have not involved re-estimation of the Mineral Resource, but have been adjusted for depletion by mining. These tabulations are not included as part of this report. An updated MRE was completed in early 2023, dated December 2022, which included drilling completed in 2022.
5.5 | Historical Mineral Reserve Estimates |
Galaxy has reported Mineral Reserves for the Mt Cattlin Property from 2009 to 2020. These estimates have been superseded by the current Mineral Reserve estimate which is detailed in this report.
In August 2009 Allkem engaged Mining Resources Pty Ltd who completed an initial Mineral Reserve based on the May 2009 Mineral Resource estimate (Table 5-7).
Table 5-7 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Reserve (August 2009).
Mineral Reserve August 2009 | |||
Material | Tonnes | Li2O% | Ta2O5 ppm |
Proven | 2,333,400 | 1.09 | 130 |
Probable | 6,949,600 | 1.02 | 140 |
Total | 9,283,000 | 1.04 | 138 |
Note: Li2O cutoff grade – 0.4% Li2O. Mineral Reserve Estimate compiled by Mr. Glenn Williamson of Mining Resources Pty Ltd. |
In March 2010, an updated Mineral Reserve estimate was completed by Croeser Pty Ltd which appears in Table 5-8.
Table 5-8 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Reserve (March 2010).
Mineral Reserve March 2010 | |||
Material | Tonnes | Li2O% | Ta2O5 ppm |
Proven |
2,683,000 |
1.08 |
135 |
Probable |
8,684,000 |
1.04 |
151 |
Total |
11,367,000 |
1.05 |
147 |
Note: Li2O cut-off grade – 0.4% Li2O.
Mineral Reserve Estimate compiled by Mr. Roselt Croeser of Croeser Pty Ltd. |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Galaxy released an updated Mineral Reserve estimate in March 2018, completed by Mining Plus, which included mining depletion to end December 2017 (Table 5-9).
Table 5-9 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Reserve, Mining Plus (December 2017).
Mt Cattlin Mineral Reserve December 2017 | |||
Material | Tonnes | Li2O % | Contained Li2O Metal |
Proven | 1,950,000 | 1.03 | 20.4 |
Probable | 5,690,000 | 1.06 | 60.1 |
Total | 7,640,000 | 1.05 | 80.5 |
Note: Reported at a cut-off grade of 0.4% Li2O. All figures rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Includes mining dilution and mining recovery. Mineral Reserve includes surface inventory. Pits include 315kT of diluted and recovered Inferred Resource not included in this Table. Mineral Reserves are not additional to Mineral Resources. |
Subsequent published Mineral Reserve estimates, including in 2020 and 2021, have not involved re-estimation, but have been adjusted for depletion due to mining. These tabulations are not included as part of this report.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
6. Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit
6.1 | Regional Geology |
The Mt Cattlin deposit is a spodumene-rich tantalite-bearing pegmatite located in the Phillips River Mineral Field, within the Ravensthorpe Terrane, which forms part of the Archaean Ravensthorpe greenstone belt.
The Ravensthorpe greenstone belt has been subdivided into three distinct tectonostratigraphic terranes by Witt (1998), shown in Figure 6-1.
Figure 6-1 – Geological plan showing the location and geological setting of the Mt Cattlin Deposit.
The Carlingup Terrane (c. 2,960 million years) lies to the east and comprises metamorphosed mafic, ultramafic, and sedimentary rocks with minor felsic volcanic rocks. The Ravensthorpe Terrane (c. 2,990 to 2,970 million years), which hosts Mt Cattlin, forms the central portion of the belt, and comprises a tonalitic complex, together with a volcanic association with predominantly andesitic volcaniclastic rocks.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
The Cocanarup greenstones to the west consist mainly of metasedimentary rocks, with lesser ultramafic and mafic rocks.
The Ravensthorpe Terrane is dominated by an approximately 25 km diameter, oval-shaped calc-alkaline complex, which is subdivided into an intrusive core comprising the Manyutop Tonalite which is flanked by the Annabelle Volcanics. Both sequences show similar chemical and age characteristics.
The Annabelle Volcanic sequence is dominated by volcaniclastic rocks with minor lavas. The sequence comprises roughly 10% to 20% basalt, 50% to 70% andesite and 20% to 30% dacite (Witt, 1998). Witt interprets the Terrane as fault-bounded accreted domains, with subsequent deformation producing the major south-plunging Beulah Synform. The metamorphic grade indicated by metamorphic mineral assemblages varies from greenschist to amphibolite facies.
6.2 | Local and Property Geology |
Mt Cattlin lies within the Ravensthorpe Terrane, with host rocks comprising both the Annabelle Volcanics to the west and the Manyutup Tonalite to the east. The contact between these rock types transects the project area.
The Annabelle Volcanics at Mt Cattlin includes intermediate to mafic volcanic rocks comprising pyroclastic material and lavas. Several phases of the Manyutup Tonalite were recognized by Witt (1998) in the Ravensthorpe Terrane, but in the Mt Cattlin area, this unit is dominated by tonalite (quartz diorite).
Both the Annabelle Volcanics and the Manyutup Tonalite are intruded by numerous fine to coarse-grained metamorphosed dolerite dykes. A north-northwest trending gabbro, described as a pyroxenite in earlier reports, crosses the eastern edge of the Mt Cattlin pegmatite orebody.
The Archean age Annabelle Volcanics, a sequence of metamorphosed ultramafic, mafic, and felsic rocks (Wells et al 2022), with dating of rhyolite in the Annabelle Volcanics at 2989 ± 11 Ma. To the east, another swarm of north-trending pegmatites intrude both the Annabelle Volcanics and the adjoining Archean calc–alkaline Manyutup Tonalite. Nearby some 8 km SW of Ravensthorpe, coarse-grained tonalite was dated at 2965 ± 12 Ma (U–P. In the same area, a tonalite porphyry dyke was dated at 2989 ± 7 Ma identical to the reported age of the Annabelle Volcanics. It has been speculated that the pegmatite swarms may be genetically related to a late-phase, Archean quartz-monzonite located some 7 km to the NE.
Metamorphism of the Annabelle Volcanics and Manyutup Tonalite country rocks grades up to amphibolite facies at Mt Cattlin. While the metamorphism of the country rocks up to amphibolite facies grade is evident, the pegmatites remain unmetamorphosed.
A detailed local geology map of the Mt Cattlin Project area was compiled by Dr Mike Grigson of ARC Minerals and has been presented in Figure 6-2.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 6-2 – Mt Cattlin local interpreted surface geology map showing lithology sequences and the spatial extent of the lithium resource (compiled M. Grigson, ARC Minerals).
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
A Stratigraphic column of the local geology is shown below (Figure 6-3).
Figure 6-3 – Mt Cattlin Stratigraphic Column.
The pegmatites which comprise the orebody occur as a series of sub-horizontal sills hosted by both volcanic and intrusive rocks. These are of the albite-spodumene subtype (Wells et al, 2020). Several dolerite or quartz gabbro dykes trending roughly east-northeast and north-south crosscut all lithologies including the pegmatite sills and are believed to be Proterozoic in age.
The drilling cross-section depicted in Figure 6-4 and the perspective view in Figure 6-5 illustrates the flat-lying nature of the pegmatite horizons and the relationship to the later cross-cutting dolerite dyke.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 6-4 – Cross-section showing deeper NW zone pegmatite horizon.
Figure 6-5 – Perspective view looking NE and Cross-section showing deeper NW zone pegmatite horizon.
A significant sub-vertical fault with a north-northwest-trending orientation has been confirmed on drilling cross-sections and aeromagnetic data. This fault transgresses the western side of the currently defined orebody and offsets the pegmatite as well as the main east-northeast trending dolerite dyke. Displacement across this fault appears to be oblique, with the west block down and with a sinistral component.
The weathering profile across the Mt Cattlin area is typically shallow, with fresh rock generally being encountered at depths of less than 20 meters below the surface.
6.3 | Deposit Type |
Pegmatites form the host rock to the Li2O and Ta2O5 mineralization at Mt Cattlin. It is generally accepted that pegmatites form by a process of fractional crystallization of an initially granitic composition melt. The fractional crystallization concentrates incompatible elements, such as light ion lithophile elements and volatiles (such as B, Li, F, P, H2O, and CO2) into the late-stage melt phase. The volatiles lower the
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
viscosity of the melt and reduce the solidification temperature to levels as low as 350°C to 400°C. This permits fractional crystallization to proceed to extreme levels, resulting in highly evolved end-member pegmatites. The fluxing effect of incompatible elements and volatiles allows rapid diffusion rates of ions, resulting in the formation of very large crystals characteristic of pegmatites.
The less dense pegmatitic magma may rise and accumulate at the top of the granitic intrusive body. However, typically the more fractionated pegmatitic melt phases escape into the surrounding country rock along faults or other structures to form pegmatites external to the parent intrusive, which is the case at Mt Cattlin.
Highly fractionated pegmatites can occur many kilometers from the parent intrusion and are classified as LCT (lithium, cesium, tantalum) pegmatites (Wells et al, 2022). The fractionation trend with distance from the granitic source is shown diagrammatically in Figure 6-6 (London, 2008).
Figure 6-6 – Chemical evolution through a lithium-rich pegmatite group with distance from granitic source intrusion (London, 2008).
Based on apparent mineral assemblages and textures, Mt Cattlin has been categorized as an albite-spodumene type with the LCT classification. Moreover, the relatively highly coarse nature of spodumene at Mt Cattlin compared to that of other LCT pegmatites in WA suggests that these pegmatites crystallized from a high-fluxing agent melt (Wells et al, 2022). The whole rock geochemistry and mineralogy at Mt Cattlin indicate a broad fractionation trend to the northeast. The broad change in mineralogy from spodumene only to spodumene + lepidolite towards the northeast may represent a residual concentration of volatile and incompatible elements in this direction (Sweetapple, 2010).
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Various types of internal zonation from the footwall to the hanging wall of the pegmatites, based on variations in mineralogy, grain size and fabric, are reported in the literature (London, 2008). While zonation is not strongly developed in the Mt Cattlin pegmatites, changes in mineralogy and grain size are recognized across the pegmatite in places. In addition, the characteristics of the Mt Cattlin pegmatites vary to some extent laterally and between the different pegmatite sheets. Late stage metasomatism of lithia, in proximity to both the later dykes and post-emplacement faults is recognized.
6.4 | Mineralization |
Mt Cattlin hosts spodumene-rich, Ta-bearing pegmatites. They occur as a series of sub-horizontal to shallowly dipping horizons (Figure 6-7) that have intruded both the Annabelle Volcanics and the Manyutup Tonalite in areas close to the contact between these two sequences.
Figure 6-7 – Mt Cattlin Pit 1A north wall showing pegmatite and quartz tourmaline veins.
In places, the pegmatites occur as stacked horizons that overlap in section. Pegmatite mineralization defined to date covers an area of around 1.6 km east-west and 1 km north-south. The main pegmatite units are generally between 30 m and 140 m below the surface, and outcrop in some locations.
The Mt Cattlin pegmatites have diverse mineralogy with major minerals comprising quartz, albite, cleavelandite (platy albite), microcline, perthite, spodumene, muscovite and lepidolite. Minor minerals
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
include tourmaline, schorlite, elbaite, beryl, microlite, columbite-tantalite, sphalerite, amblygonite-montebrasite, triphylite, apatite, spessartite and fluorite (Grubb, 1963, Sweetapple, 2010). Spodumene is the dominant Li2O ore mineral.
Several varieties of spodumene are recognized including light green and white varieties. Ta2O5 occurs as the manganese-rich end members of the columbite-tantalite series including Ta-rich manganotantalite, and as microlite (Sweetapple, 2010). An open pit exposure with spodumene crystals in pegmatite is shown in Figure 6-8.
Figure 6-8 – Spodumene crystals in pegmatite (arrowed), Mt Cattlin Pit 1A north wall.
Various lithium minerals have been observed within the pegmatites and include the following:
● | Spodumene LiAl(SiO3)2 containing 4% to 8% Li2O, |
● | Amblygonite, LiAl(F,OH)PO4, contains 8% to 10% Li2O, |
● | Lepidolite, (lithium mica) contains 2% to 4% Li2O, |
● | Cookeite, (lithium chlorite). |
The mineralogy within the pegmatites varies laterally and displays a crude zonation oriented perpendicular to the margins, which are identified by changes in mineralogy and grain size.
Northeast portions of the deposit contain the Li2O-bearing mica lepidolite. The lepidolite-rich zones contain higher Ta2O5 grades, which are mainly microlite, and display more pronounced zonation
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
perpendicular to the margins of the pegmatite. Zonation within the pegmatites include an aplitic rock comprising mainly quartz-albite-muscovite near the contacts with the country rocks, and zones of predominantly light green, and predominantly white spodumene. Lepidolite is generally associated with white spodumene. Quartz-tourmaline veins related to pegmatite emplacement are observed in the country rock up to tens of meters away from the pegmatite.
6.5 | Alteration |
Mt Cattlin displays zones of high-grade, unaltered spodumene through to zones of low-grade, highly altered spodumene, which post-date pegmatite emplacement. Two distinct styles of alteration in which spodumene is replaced by finely crystalline micas are observed within altered regions of the deposit and comprise the following:
6.5.1 | Symplectic / Graphic Textured Alteration |
Presents as microscopic intergrowths of spodumene and quartz and is abundant on the margins of the pegmatites. Typically occurs where spodumene is proximal to increased amounts of albite.
Graphic textured alteration is generally more abundant where the pegmatites contact the host rock, and rapid cooling has occurred.
6.5.2 | Pseudomorphic alteration |
Ranging from minor replacement at the crystal margins to complete replacement comprised of a complex assemblage of pumpellyite, cookeite, sericitic mica and secondary feldspars (dark green spodumene). Predominant in coarse-grained, megacrystic (+20 cm) spodumene. The progressive darkening of spodumene is positively associated with the degree of observed alteration. With increases in alteration, lithium content decreases as spodumene crystals are pseudo-morphically replaced by black-green lithium-bearing micas.
Although lithium content within spodumene at Mt Catlin is negatively correlated with post-emplacement alteration (Wells et al, 2022), high degrees of alteration are interpreted to be more limited in occurrence and often connected with fractures or faults cutting through the pegmatite (Sweetapple, 2010).
A sample of drill core displayed in Figure 6-9 is a typical example of the dark green spodumene alteration type which is associated with prehnite-rich veins.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 6-9 – Alteration of light green spodumene to a dark green mineral on the margins of a vein composed predominantly of prehnite (Drillhole GXMCMTD03, 22.5m).
6.6 | Geometallurgical Model |
A geometallurgical approach to modelling the deposit geology at Mt Cattlin has been adopted. This approach aims integrate the information required to ensure that the produced spodumene concentrate meets product specifications including requirements for a minimum lithia grade, plus upper limits of deleterious elements Figure 6-10.
Figure 6-10 – Geometallurgical (“GeoMet”) Model Venn diagram.
Metallurgical processing methods call for distinct physical properties of the pegmatite material, which varies at the regional and deposit scale. Due to the nature of its emplacement and associated magmatic
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
fractional crystallization, the skin of a pegmatite contacting the host rock is often physically and chemically unique to that of the coarse-grained spodumene-rich core. This finer-grained and often mineralogically variable material at the margins can lead to reduced recoverability of the spodumene compared to the coarser-grained spodumene in the interior of the pegmatite.
The local and regional chemical variation affects the deportment of lithium and associated deleterious elements. Lithia-bearing minerals such as petalite and/or lepidolite necessitate alternative treatment techniques to that of spodumene. In addition, the post-emplacement alteration of spodumene may impact processing performance and quality due to the pseudo-morphic replacement of spodumene with micaceous mineral assemblages.
Additional HQ diameter diamond drilling was undertaken in 2023 to further understand the results obtained in 2021 diamond drilling. Generally fine grained spodumene bearing pegmatites have a higher Na20 content than the metacrystic spodumene and in general, if Na2O > 4% by assay, then Li2O is < 0.4%. This relationship has been used to domain out the finer-grained spodumene, which from test work on 2021 samples, has recoveries between 30-40%. This is approximately half of that considered normal in the process plant-scale dense media separation process to upgrade spodumene to a commercial concentrate.
The 2023 geometallurgical drilling that was completed to inform the domains of the geometallurgical model is illustrated in Figure 6-11.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 6-10 – Cross-Section looking east showing modelled upper and lower pegmatites and 2023 metallurgical drilling.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
The geometallurgical model at Mt Cattlin sub-domains the physically and mineralogically unique areas within each pegmatite. This includes areas of varying lithia deportments, such as petalite-rich domains, plus the finer-grained material at the margins of the pegmatites (Figure 6-11).
Figure 6-11 – Cross-section looking east showing modelled pegmatite plus sub-domained, spodumene-rich core.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
7. Exploration
7.1 | Exploration Work |
Mt Cattlin’s exploration activity is currently focused on the Mt Cattlin mine lease north of Ravensthorpe in Western Australia. Other exploration has processed a regional understanding of lithia mineralization in an extensive mature exploration package. Of these the Enduro and Baker Hills tenements and surrounds show the best proposition for lithia in spodumene as and exploration target. The district as a whole is prospective for lode hosted gold and copper mineralization. Selective areas may be prospective for massive sulfide hosted Nickel mineralization, to the east.
In addition to drilling, various programs of surface geological mapping and sampling, remote sensing, airborne and ground geophysics have been carried out over the Mt Cattlin mining lease and surrounding exploration leases.
7.2 | Geological Exploration and Drilling |
7.2.1 | Geological Exploratory Work |
7.2.1.1 | Geological Mapping |
Various campaigns of geological mapping of the Mt Cattlin pegmatites and surrounding lithologies have been undertaken, including by Sofoulis (1958), WMC (Cameron and Ross, 1963), and by Pancontinental (Broomfield, 1990).
Dr. Mike Grigson of Arc Minerals conducted a regional mapping program of the Mt Cattlin area in 2010. The interpretative mapping was accompanied by rock chip sampling, which succeeded in identifying several sub-cropping pegmatite units in the area surrounding Mt Cattlin.
This regional mapping work has also been supported by various phases of petrological work by consultant Dick England and detailed costean mapping and ongoing mineralogical work completed by Dr Marcus Sweetapple, from 2010 to 2022. Results of this work have been used to develop the interpretative geological and metallurgical models which are currently being used by Galaxy at Mt Cattlin.
7.2.1.2 | Surface Mapping and Sampling |
Various campaigns of surface rock chip and soil sampling have been carried out over the area, undertaken by WMC in the 1960s and Pancontinental in the late 1980s (Broomfield, 1990).
Haddington Resources Ltd (“Haddington”) collected 84 soil samples in 2005 which were on a 200 m by 100 m grid pattern using a -1.5 mm sieve and collecting approximately 200 g of fine soil from around 20
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
cm below surface (Young, 2005). The Haddington program defined a Li2O soil anomaly over the area of sub-cropping pegmatite located to the east of Floater Road, in addition to the largely concealed pegmatite to the west of Floater Road. The Li2O anomaly was further supported by anomalous results in elements Be, Sn, Rb and Cs, Ta, and Nb.
Several surface sampling campaigns have been conducted over the Galaxy tenure since the recommencement of operations in 2016. A total of 3,725 surface samples with Li2O and/or Ta2O5 assays have been recorded in the Galaxy exploration database and are displayed on the map presented in Figure 7-1. A total of 2,956 samples have been collected since January 2016, which included rock chip sampling, light vehicle-mounted auger sampling, handheld auger sampling, traditional surface soil sampling and mobile metal ion (“MMI”) soil sampling.
Even though the regolith is disturbed by decades of broad acre cropping and fertilizer application, loam geochemical sampling provides good target generation and focus.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 7-1 – Regional map showing various surface samples collected across the Mt Cattlin tenements.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Auger drilling systems were utilized where the surface soil had been disturbed by farming activities, with the samples collected at blade refusal, which ranged from 0.5 m to 1.5 m below surface. Approximately 300 g of un-sieved soil was collected from the end of the drillhole. The light vehicle mounted auger samples were collected on a 200 m by 200 m grid pattern. with the locations presented in Figure 7-2.
Figure 7-2 – Light vehicle-mounted auger sample locations.
Traditional soil sampling techniques and MMI soil sampling were conducted over areas with an undisturbed regolith. Soil sampling grids were 200 m by 100 m for MMI and 100 m by 100 m for traditional soils. MMI samples were collected between 10 cm and 25 cm below surface, with the sample representing a composite over the 15 cm interval. Approximately 250 g to 350 g of unsieved material was collected. Traditional soil samples were collected at an approximate sample depth of 20 cm below the surface. A -2 mm sieve was used to collect around 200 g of soil material.
Soil sampling in 2019 defined a moderate Lithium and Tantalum soil anomaly on tenement E74/379 and enabled a contour map of the calculated fractionation index to be developed (Figure 7-3). The anomaly was subsequently named Mt Short Prospect. The company has planned a future drilling program to test the anomaly in 2023/4.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 7-3 – Mt Short contours of calculated fractionation index from soil sample assays.
Rock chip sampling of outcropping pegmatites, 2 km north of Mt Cattlin, has returned highly anomalous tantalum values and elevated lithium values. Low to very low K/Rb element ratios indicated a highly fractionated pegmatite body (Figure 7-4).
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 7-4 – Enduro Prospect location map and K/Rb ratios.
This anomalous area was given the name Enduro Prospect and the target was further evaluated with drill testing. The completed drilling identified a quartz, albite spodumene muscovite pegmatite at depth. The best intercept recovered in the maiden program was 2 m at 1.45% Li2O. Galaxy had plans for further
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
drilling at the Enduro Prospect. In 2022/3, 14 new RC drillholes were completed over the Enduro prospect for 1,785m. The best intercept recorded was from ENRC 026 from 53 t0 54m at 1.59 % lithia. Whilst mineralized with typical LCT assemblages, Enduro is dominated by fine-grain size and alternation mineralogy.
7.2.1.3 | Hydrologic and Stream Sediment Sampling |
Mt Cattlin does not utilize stream sediment sampling for exploration purposes.
Mining operations do not utilize surface water courses for water supply. Detailed discussion on water sampling and monitoring is provided in Chapter 17.
7.2.1.4 | Remote Sensing |
Galaxy has acquired various types of remote sensing imagery over the Mt Cattlin tenements, including Landsat, Quickbird, and Pleiades. The Pleiades satellite Imagery was acquired in May 2018, and captured in July and August 2017 at a 50 cm resolution. The Pleiades image with overlying Galaxy tenements is shown in Figure 7-5.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 7-5 – Pleiades satellite image with overlying Mt Cattlin tenements.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
7.2.1.5 | Airborne Geophysics |
Various airborne geophysical surveys have been flown over Mt Cattlin, including airborne magnetics, radiometrics and Versatile Time Domain EM (“VTEM”). In 2007, an airborne radiometric and magnetic survey was flown over a large area including Mt Cattlin by UTS Geophysics in conjunction with Pioneer Nickel, at a sensor height of 30 m on east-west lines at 50 m spacing.
A helicopter borne VTEM survey was also flown in 2007, by Geotech Airborne Ltd, also in conjunction with Pioneer Nickel. An image showing total magnetic intensity covering the Mt Cattlin area is shown in Figure 7-6.
These surveys did not directly detect lithium/tantalum mineralization but assisted in the lithological and structural interpretation of the geology of the area.
Figure 7-6 – Aeromagnetic image of the Mt Cattlin area (TMI).
7.2.1.6 | Ground Geophysics |
In late 2010 Galaxy trialed 2D seismic reflection using HiSeis as a contractor. The seismic work crystallized the 2021-2022 resource infill program, when two of the reflectors could be clearly correlated with the two pegmatite orebodies in the Stage 4 development.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
In October 2017, Galaxy conducted several ground geophysical surveys over their tenure including ground penetrating radar (“GPR”) and electrical resistivity imaging. In 2018 a large GPR survey was undertaken by Ultramag Geophysics (Figure 7-7).
Figure 7-7 – Ground penetrating radar survey location plan with profile location shown in red.
Several anomalies were identified from the GPR geophysical survey but drill testing of the of these anomalies has not identified any mineralised pegmatites to date. The technique has had moderate success in identifying pegmatites under cover, these are then routinely tested for lithia and associated geochemistry.
Core Geophysics (“CORE”) was contracted to complete an electrical resistivity imaging survey (“ERI”) at the Enduro Prospect and around the Mt Cattlin spodumene operation. The survey was completed in December 2020. The objective of the geophysical work was to image near-surface vertical variations in resistivity to aid the geological understanding. The survey was expected to map changes in resistivity across known pegmatites as a possible means for electrical discrimination.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
7.2.1.7 | Other Exploration |
In 2010, Galaxy Resources consolidated several mining and prospecting leases at Mt Cattlin into a single mining lease, M74/244 which has a total area of 1,830 hectares.
Although Mt Cattlin is the only known major lithium/tantalum deposit in the Ravensthorpe region, other metal occurrences of copper and gold mineralization are known within the Mt Cattlin mining lease and on adjacent properties. These occurrences have been the subject of historic, small-scale mining. The most important of these are the Mt Cattlin gold-copper in which is located approximately 1 km east-southeast of Mt Cattlin, Marion Martin 1.5 km south, Floater 1.5 km north and Maori Queen 3.5 km northeast (Witt, 1998).
Various open file Department of Mines and Petroleum reports have shown that some small volume, potentially copper-gold resources remain for these properties. They are currently not the subject of any active exploration or mining.
In 2016 Galaxy acquired Exploration leases E74/406, E74/399 and E74/379 from ACH Minerals (now Medallion Metals) where ACH retained the gold and copper rights over the tenure.
Projects to the west and south of the Mt Cattlin project, including Bakers Hill, Floater and Sirdar to the north of Mt Cattlin have been explored by Galaxy for pegmatite-hosted lithium/tantalum mineralization. Various programs of predominantly surface sampling, geological mapping and airborne geophysics have been carried out over the Floater, Sirdar, and Bakers Hill tenements. Bakers Hill remains the locus of active exploration.
An RC program testing an outcropping pegmatite unit lying mainly on the Sirdar project was completed in 2009. This work followed up results from significant pegmatite rock chip samples with assays up to 2.04% Li2O. While the program encountered subsurface pegmatite, it was not successful in intersecting economic widths of mineralization.
7.2.2 | Geological Drilling |
With regards to this Chapter, all commentary, figures, and data refer to the drilling within the extents of the Mineral Resource modelling export unless otherwise stipulated. The extents of the Mineral Resource modelling are mapped in various exports (Figure 7-8) in the Map Grid of Australia (“MGA”), 1994 co-ordinate system.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 7-8 – Map of the resource modelling export extents.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Samples in the drilling database have been collected using a combination of diamond core (“DD”), reverse circulation (“RC”), reverse circulation with diamond drill tails (RC-DD), rotary air blast (“RAB”) and unspecified open-hole (“OH”) drilling methods. Data from previous owners has been incorporated into the Mineral Resource database, however the vast majority of data has been generated during Galaxy drilling programs, (Table 7-1).
Table 7-1 – Details on drilling database data within the resource export extents.
Company | Years | Type | Hole-ID | # of Drillholes | Total Meters |
Greenstone | 1996 | DD | GD018-GD020 | 3 | 699 |
Pancon | 1988-1990 | RC/O H | CCP040/000- CCP720/860 | 120 | 2627 |
Greenstone | 1996? | RC | GRC060-GRC091,GRC247-GRC254 | 38 | 947 |
Metana | 1998? | DD | RR0095 - RR0131 | 12 | 422 |
Haddington | 2001 | RC | CCC10-CCC58 | 49 | 1042 |
Haddington | 2001 | DD | CCM1-CCM9 | 9 | 119 |
Galaxy | 2001 | RC | GX001-GX141 | 126 | 7803 |
Galaxy | 2001 | RAB | GX220-GX241, GX297-GX299 | 23 | 402 |
Galaxy | 2001 | DD | GXD01-GXD06 | 6 | 336 |
Galaxy | 2007 | RC | GX450-GX799 | 341 | 13994 |
Galaxy | 2007 | DD | GXD09-GXD13 | 5 | 196 |
Galaxy | 2008 | RC | GX800-GX909 | 110 | 6502 |
Galaxy | 2008 | DD | GXMCMTD01-06, GXMCGTD01-04 | 11 | 433 .7 |
Galaxy | 2009 | RAB | MB01 – MB06 (Water Monitoring Bores – no assays) | 6 | 284 |
Galaxy | 2009 | RC | GX910-GX1065(ex GX952,GX953) | 154 | 9225 |
Galaxy | 2008-2017 | RAB | WTD01 – WTD11,WTD13 – WTD17, ‘WTD20- WTD20C,WTD21 – WTD23, WTD25, WTD28-WTD31, WTD34 (water related holes, no assay data) | 26 | 2428 |
Unrecorded | Unrecorded | RC | MISC4 – MISC9 | 9 | 710 |
Galaxy | 2010-2011 | RC GC | G0050 - G1392 | 1,219 | 45178 |
Galaxy | 2010 | RC | GX1066, GX1076 - GX1128 | 55 | 4867 |
Galaxy | 2010 | DD | GXD014-GXD018 | 5 | 390 |
Galaxy | 2010 | RC GC | G1A238001 - G1A238048 | 99 | 2551 |
Galaxy | 2010 | RAB | TS1 | 1 | 17 |
Galaxy | 2012 | RC | GX1129 – GX1168 | 40 | 3258 |
Galaxy | 2016 | DD | MTCDD1 – MTCDD6, and MTCDD1W1 | 7 | 3852 |
Galaxy | 2017 | RC GC | GC1A001 - GC1A022 | 6 | 324 |
Galaxy | 2017 | RC | GX1169 – GX1191 | 23 | 1332 |
Galaxy | 2017 | DD | NEGEO001 - NEGEO002; NEHQ001;NEMT001 - NEMT003 | 6 | 335 |
Galaxy | 2017 | RC | NWST001 - NWST012 | 13 | 969 |
Galaxy | 2017 | RC | PITST001 - PITST005; PITST006 - PITST0010 | 9 | 450 |
Galaxy | 2017 | DD | SEHQ001 - SEHQ003 | 3 | 122 |
Galaxy | 2017 | DD | SWMET001 - SWMET004 | 4 | 269 |
Galaxy | 2017 | RC | SWRC001 - SWRC072 | 54 | 3919 |
GXY | 2018 | RC | FBRC001 - FBRC014 | 14 | 1400 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Company | Years | Type | Hole-ID | # of Drillholes | Total Meters |
Galaxy | 2017-2018 | RC GC | 1EGC001-1EGC084 | 41 | 1145 |
Galaxy | 2017-2018 | RC | NERC005 - NERC170 | 94 | 6806 |
Galaxy | 2017-2018 | RC-DD | NERCDD020 - NERCDD168 | 9 | 561 |
Galaxy | 2017-2018 | RC GC | SWGC001 - SWGC742 | 384 | 8993 |
Galaxy | 2017-2018 | RC | GXY060 - GXY259 | 47 | 2326 |
Galaxy | 2018-2019 | RC,RC-DD | NWRC001 – NWRC086 | 87 | 14760 |
Galaxy | 2018-2020 | RC GC | SEGC0003 - SEGC0615 | 343 | 9504 |
GXY | 2018 | RC | STRC011 | 1 | 174 |
Galaxy | 2018 | RC GC | 1FGC0001 - 1FGC0145 | 138 | 6707 |
Galaxy | 2018 | DD | DIV-H01 - DIV-H02 | 2 | 60 |
Galaxy | 2018 | RC | DPSTRC001 - DPSTRC007 | 7 | 570 |
Galaxy | 2018 | RC-DD | GXYDD254 | 1 | 69 |
Galaxy | 2018 | DD | NEMT003 - NEMT005 | 2 | 92 |
Galaxy | 2018 | DD | SEDD081 – SEDD274 | 16 | 367 |
Galaxy | 2018 | DD | SEMT001 | 1 | 29 |
Galaxy | 2018 | RC | SERC002 – SERC254 | 133 | 7799 |
Galaxy | 2019 | RC | SWRC073 - SWRC083 | 13 | 2227 |
Galaxy | 2019 | RC | GPRC029 | 1 | 44 |
Galaxy | 2020 | RC GC | NEGC0001 - NEGC0019 | 19 | 769 |
Galaxy | 2021 | RC-DD | GTNW01-GTNW06 | 6 | 747 |
Galaxy | 2021 | RC,RC-DD | NWRC087 – NWRC0114 | 28 | 3363 |
Galaxy | 2022 | RC-DD | GTNW07-GTNW09 | 3 | 651 |
Galaxy | 2022 | RC,RC-DD | NWRC115 – NWRC252 | 246 | 49249 |
Galaxy | 2022 | DD | NWDD001 – NWDD004 | 4 | 1031 |
Galaxy | 2022 | RC | NWGC001-NWGC069 | 47 | 2288 |
Galaxy | 2023 | RC | NWGC079-NWGC145 | 58 | 4169 |
Galaxy | 2022 | RC | MB13-MB20 (Water Monitoring) | 8 | 800 |
Galaxy | 2022 | RC | WTD 21A (Water Related) | 1 | 100 |
Galaxy | 2022 | RC | SWRC089 | 1 | 314 |
Galaxy | 2023 | RC | SWRC091-SWRC105,SWRC107 | 16 | 3942 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Details of the drilling completed outside the resource modelling export are provided in Table 7-2.
Table 7-2 – Details for other Exploration drilling external to the resource export extents.
7.2.2.1 | RC Drilling |
Drilling from 2001 onwards has been undertaken by Galaxy, however a prolonged period of care and maintenance from 2012 to 2017 has led to two distinct phases of exploration/resource drilling and grade control drilling. Phase 1 drilling was completed prior to 2016, while Phase 2 drilling was completed during and after 2016.
Mineralised pegmatite lenses at Mt Cattlin are generally sub-horizontal with gentle undulations and are largely isotropic in the horizontal plane. Drill traverses are generally aligned perpendicular to the mineralised trend, with mostly vertical drillholes completed.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
7.2.2.2 | Prior to 2016 – Phase 1 |
Drilling completed by Galaxy prior to 2016 was dominated by RC drillholes. In general, samples for assay analysis were collected using a riffle splitter, with a cone splitter used for later drilling programs.
During the 2007 field season, samples were collected from the RC drilling via a conventional rig mounted cyclone and bag system, and subsequently split in this instance through a 25/75 two stage riffle splitter for final sample separation in the field. Samples were collected at one meter intervals.
During the 2008 drilling campaign, samples were collected at one meter intervals in plastic bags via a conventional rig mounted cyclone and bag system, and subsequently split. Samples were triple-tier riffle split directly from the cyclone into calico bags which reduced the sample size to approximately 2 kg to 4 kg, suitable for laboratory submission.
From 2009 a cone splitter was used on the RC rig, with samples split directly from the cyclone into calico sample bags where the sample size was reduced to 12.5% of the original size producing a 2 kg to 4 kg sub-sample.
RC chips were geologically logged and pegmatite intervals, together with an additional one to two meter zone of country rock either side of the logged pegmatite, dispatched for assay analysis.
RC drilling carried out by Galaxy in 2001 and 2007 to 2008 was completed using a 4 5/8-inch conventional face-sampling hammer. During 2009 and 2010 the hammer diameter decreased slightly to 5 1/4 inch.
Sample recovery estimates of RC drilling from the start of 2008 to 2011 was routinely recorded using the measured weight of the split sample, which was collected in a calico bag, however during the period 2007 to 2009, the entire sample from selected drillholes was weighed. Sample recovery from the 2001 RC drilling was reported by Hellman (2001) to be generally average to good, with greater than 80% recovery except when high flow rates of water were encountered.
Historical sample recovery for Pancontinental RC drilling was also reported to have been acceptable at around 80% (Broomfield, 1990).
7.2.2.3 | Post 2016 – Phase 2 |
RC drilling has typically been undertaken using a 5 ¼ inch diameter bit. RC chips have been geologically logged and representative samples stored in chip trays for later validation against assays and general reference.
Samples selected for assay comprise all pegmatite intervals and extends a minimum of 3 meters into the adjacent waste rock, both above and below the pegmatite intersection. Oxidation horizons and water tables are also logged using the Galaxy standard lithological and mineralogical observations codes.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
A review of the geological logging and sampling procedures was completed by the Allkem employee set forth herein, while drill rigs were onsite at the time of the various on-site inspections. The Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for RC geological logging and sampling have also been reviewed.
Since 2016, sample recovery has been recorded for selected exploration and resource drillholes using a qualitative estimation method. Recovery is routinely accepted to be very good and is reflected in the fact that 98.5% of recorded intervals are noted to have very good recovery at greater than 80%.
7.2.2.4 | Diamond Drilling |
Diamond drilling has been undertaken sporadically throughout the life of the project, typically drilled for metallurgical and geotechnical purposes in addition to geological requirements. Much of the Galaxy diamond core has been drilled at HQ or PQ size, with several NQ sized diamond drillholes completed in 2016, testing the deepest extents of the pegmatites.
Within the Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource estimate data extent, diamond core samples comprise approximately 3% of all samples.
In total, 46 diamond drillholes have been historically geotechnically logged by either in-house geologists or external geotechnical consultants.
7.2.2.5 | Prior to 2016 – Phase 1 |
Diamond drilling was carried out for metallurgical and geotechnical purposes, in addition to geological purposes, and all Galaxy drill core was either HQ or PQ size. All angled diamond holes drilled by Galaxy were orientated, using either the Ezy-Mark tool or more recently the Reflex ACT electronic orientation tool.
Diamond core drilled by Galaxy was collected from the rig by Galaxy personnel, then orientated and marked with meter marks. The core was then photographed both wet and dry before being geologically logged.
Core was sampled on an average interval of around 1 m to geologically consistent boundaries. Pegmatite intervals and an additional 1 m to 2 m of waste above and below the pegmatite were sampled. Quarter core samples were collected from HQ and PQ core after being cut with a diamond saw, whilst half-core was occasionally sampled.
Prior to cutting, drillholes GXMCGTD01-04 and GXD014-018 were also geotechnically and structurally logged by Geologists from the Geotechnical consultancy Dempers and Seymour Pty Ltd. (Dempers & Seymour, 2008).
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
7.2.2.6 | Post 2016 – Phase 2 |
Diamond core drilled by Galaxy has been collected from the drill rig by Galaxy personnel, orientated and marked with meter marks. Bottom of drillhole orientation lines have been marked up on the diamond core of angled drillholes, using the orientation marks provided by the drillers. Detailed geological and lithological logging of the diamond core was undertaken before the core has been photographed, both wet and dry, and sampled.
Between 2016 and 2019, core samples have been typically sampled as 1 m half-core samples, however after 2019 diamond core was typically sampled as whole core and the sample length reduced to 0.5 m to keep the weight of the sample to between 2 kg and 4 kg.
The 2021 geotechnical drillholes have been geotechnically logged by an external consultant from Mine Geotech Pty Ltd.
The 2022 geotechnical drillholes have been geotechnically logged by an external sub-consultant and test work completed as reported elsewhere in this document.
7.2.2.7 | Grade Control Drilling |
All recorded Grade Control (“GC”) drilling is of the RC type. Drillhole depths are predominately in the 12 m to 50 m range in depth.
The vast majority of GC drilling has been undertaken as vertical drillholes since this is the most appropriate orientation for the predominately sub-horizontal pegmatites, however more recent GC programs have incorporated angled drillholes, designed to drill orthogonal to the pegmatite body in line with best practice.
7.2.2.8 | Prior to 2016 – Phase 1 |
Grade control logging practices prior to 2016 were not documented and it has been assumed that these programs were run in accordance with industry standard practices. This GC drilling consisted entirely of RC drilling and was completed by either InterCept Drilling or TDS Drilling.
7.2.2.9 | Post 2016 – Phase 2 |
After 2017, grade control practices have largely been in line with the routine resource development and exploration drilling practices employed by Galaxy. Logging templates and logging codes are consistent across all groups with some differences in Quality control procedures which are documented in Chapter 11. Cone splitters have been in use throughout all GC drilling on site.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
To aid ore categorization for mining and processing, the lithium mineralization has been categorized by mineralogy and color during logging. Spodumene abundance has been separated into the color categories dark green, medium green, green, pink, and white. Lepidolite abundance has been logged separately, while the presence of holmquistite, a lithium bearing waste mineral, and cookeite, a green altered spodumene with low-lithium content, have been individually recorded.
GC drillhole spacing has been variable over time ranging from 10 m by 10 m and 15 m by 15 m patterns, in the early years.
After 2018, the GC drillhole spacing increased to 20 m x 20 m in the majority of areas, however some areas of complex geology have been drilled at 10 m by 15 m or 10 m by 10 m in order to obtain more close-spaced geological information for mining (Figure 7-9).
At the end of 2022, the drill program had infilled earlier drilling to a 40 x 40 m spacing, with minor 20 x 20 m spacing in the undepleted parts of the SW zone.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 7-9 – Map of Variable Grade Control Drillhole Spacing in the SE Pit.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
To June 2023, 105 new vertical grade control drillholes were completed for 6,457 m, post the 2022 MRE estimate, to reduce data spacing to approximately 20 x 20 m spacing to support operational ore selectively and material dispatch.
7.3 | Hydrological Drilling and Sampling |
Prior to 2018, Galaxy had completed 32 water bores for 2,712m meters of vertical drilling related to water bores, water table monitoring of tails storage facilities and or water quality monitoring.
In 2022 a further 9 vertical monitoring bores for 900m where developed. Groundwater at Mt Cattlin is hyper-saline and developed in an extensive fracture controlled un-confined aquifer. Limited proportions of this are treated by reverse osmosis to potable water standards and subject to regular regulatory checks.
7.4 | Geotechnical Drilling |
A geotechnical assessment for the NW Stage expansion was undertaken as part of the Feasibility Study. The geotechnical assessment evaluates the potential for slope instabilities and derives slope design parameter recommendations for the proposed open pit mining of the NW Stage 4 pit at Mt Cattlin.
A geotechnical drilling program was undertaken to investigate ground conditions specific to the NW Stage 4 cutback. In addition, a geotechnical material properties testing program was designed to capture information pertinent to characterizing and understanding the mechanical behavior of the different materials expected to be encountered.
A total of three dedicated geotechnical diamond drill holes, totaling 651 m, were drilled in the vicinity of the Stage 4 pit walls as seen in Figure 7-10 (which used a preliminary version of the Stage 4 design for drillhole planning) with hole details listed in Table 7-3. Detailed geotechnical data, including rock mass and structure characterization, and oriented structure data were collected from these drill holes and used in the analysis. In addition to these holes, photogrammetric modelling of the current pit, structure digitization, in-pit mapping and data from previous studies was utilized.
More details on drilling, discussion on testwork, and interpretation of geotechnical parameters is provided in Chapter 12.3 Pit Optimization and 13.4 Mine Design.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 7-10 – Plan view of Mt Cattlin, with the location of the geotechnical drill holes and basic pit dimensions.
Table 7-3 – Summary of the dedicated geotechnical diamond drill holes used for the project.
DHID | X | Y | Z | Depth1 | Dip | Dip-Dir |
GTNW007 | 223,799 | 6,282,192 | 271 | 200 | -78 | 229 |
GTNW008 | 223,861 | 6,282,628 | 270 | 249 | -75 | 133 |
GTNW009 | 224,231 | 6,282,724 | 260 | 202 | -70 | 2 |
1Downhole depth. |
Figure 7-11 below, including table, summarizes the geotechnical drilling phases by year highlighting recent holes noted in the geotechnical study for the Stage 4 feasibility study.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 7-11 – Summary of the geotechnical drilling phases by year, highlighting recent holes.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
7.5 | Survey Grid Details |
All the location data presented in this report has been supplied by Galaxy in MGA94 Zone 51 projection coordinates, based upon the GDA94, Geodetic Datum of Australia, with elevations relative to the Australian Height Datum (“AHD”).
7.6 | Drillhole Collar Surveys |
Drillhole collars from companies prior to Galaxy were surveyed by various companies. Elevations were not available for some of the historical drilling, have been estimated from an accurate surface elevation model for use in the corporate drillhole database.
Since 2008, all planned drill collars have been pegged in the field using a handheld GPS. After drilling, collars have been routinely surveyed using more accurate techniques.
In 2021 and 2022 collars were pegged by Mine Site surveyors using RTK precision survey equipment.
7.6.1 | Prior to 2016 – Phase 1 |
Collars from the 2008 Galaxy RC and diamond drill programs were picked up by Cardno Spectrum Survey, using a Real Time Kinematic (“RTK”) GPS instrument, with accuracy to ±0.025 m.
From 2008 to February 2010, collar surveying was completed by Dave MacMahon Surveys Pty Ltd, using an RTK GPS instrument, with an accuracy to +/- 50 mm.
From February 2010 to closure, all resource drilling collars were surveyed by Galaxy survey staff from the Mt Cattlin operation, using a Trimble R6 GPS system which is accurate to +/- 20 mm or an RTK GPS instrument.
7.6.2 | Post 2016 – Phase 2 |
Once Mt Cattlin reopened in 2016, all drillhole collars have been surveyed by Galaxy Survey personnel exclusively, using either a Trimble R6 GPS system, which is accurate to +/- 20 mm or an RTK GPS accurate to +/- 3 mm.
Galaxy’s exploration drillhole collars were typically surveyed with Hand-Held GPS or DGPS units, with accuracies of +/- 10 m and +/- 50 cm, respectively.
All 2021-2013 exploration and development drillholes have been surveyed by an on-site mine surveyor using an RTK GPS upon request by the Exploration Manager. Detailed topography by 3D photogrammetry
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
was flown by drone aerial survey to support collar and site landform elevation determination by Rocketmine WA Pty Ltd in February 2023.
7.7 | Downhole Surveys |
Most resource drillholes at Mt Cattlin are vertical and relatively shallow, with an average depth of 46 m. Within the resource modelling export extent, 3,480 drillholes have no recorded downhole surveys, of which 100 drillholes have a collar dip between -85° and -53°.
7.7.1 | Prior to 2016 – Phase 1 |
During 2009 and early 2010, Surtron Technologies Australia Pty Ltd of Welshpool completed downhole surveying of selected RC and DD drillholes to investigate drillhole deviation. The program surveyed a total of 71 drillholes using an electronic multi-shot instrument. As a cross-check on the electronic multi-shot surveys, 25 of the same drillholes were also surveyed with a gyroscope. The investigation concluded there was minimal deviation to a depth of 50 m, with the results being generally within 2 m horizontally of the planned location at the bottom of drillhole. At depths greater than 100 m, drillhole deviation was seen to increase up to 4 m horizontally. The outcome of the project was the recommendation that downhole surveying continue to be used in all future drilling programs.
The majority of drillholes greater than 100 m in depth, and all Galaxy DD drillholes within the resource modelling export extent were surveyed using either a multi-shot instrument or gyroscope.
7.7.2 | Post 2016 – Phase 2 |
Following the recommencement of activities at Mt Cattlin in 2016, the majority of inclined drillholes, other than GC drillholes, have been downhole surveyed by either a multi-shot instrument or gyroscope, undertaken by the respective drilling companies.
The majority of drillholes in the Northwest Area (NW) drilled since 2016 have been gyroscopically surveyed by Gyro Australia, Kinetic Surveys, or the relevant drilling company.
In 2022 Devicloud methodologies were used for all the RC drilling, while Reflex downhole tools were used in diamond and RC pre-collar/diamond hole drillholes, by the relevant drilling company.
No downhole surveying has been undertaken in GC drillholes, due to their short length.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
7.8 | Drillhole Data and Database |
The drillhole dataset within the Mineral Resource estimate extents contains 3,956 drillholes for a total of 181,895.45 m. Summary drillhole details have been provided for all drilling inside the resource limits in Table 7-4 and for all other Mt Cattlin tenements in Table 7-5.
Table 7-4 – Summary drillhole data within the resource extents.
Hole Type | Avg (m) | Count | Total (m) |
RC | 79 | 2,825 | 223,197 |
RABR | 56 | 5651 | 3,131 |
DDH | 87 | 9697 | 8,319 |
RC_DD | 115 | 4718 | 5,390 |
PC | 22 | 120 | 2,627 |
Table 7-5 – Summary drillhole data for all Mt Cattlin tenements.
Hole Type | Avg (m) | Count | Total (m) |
RC | 81 | 494 | 40,037 |
RAB | 23 | 112 | 2,575 |
DDH | 63 | 63 | 5,971 |
RC_DDT | 97 | 9 | 874 |
7.8.1 | Drillhole database |
Prior to 2017, drillhole data was collated and stored in a Microsoft Access Database and later in a Microsoft SQL database as a Micromine GBIS database.
In 2017, a new Microsoft SQL database was built using the Maxwell Geoservices (Maxwell) DataShed database and associated software. The compilation was performed and managed by Maxwell until January 2019 when Galaxy employed an in-house database administrator.
From 2017 onwards, field geological logging data has been predominantly captured using the Maxwell LogChief logging program, which is then transferred directly to the main SQL database. LogChief logging templates are consistent between exploration and GC drilling programs, apart from quality control sampling for which there are slightly differing methodologies.
Site surveyed collar pickups and drillhole downhole survey data have been loaded and validated by an individual data file for each drillhole started into the offsite database by the database administrator.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
8. Sample Preparation, Analyses And Security
Drilling from 2001 onwards has been undertaken by Galaxy however, a prolonged period of care and maintenance from 2013 to 2017 has led to two distinct phases of exploration, resource development and grade control drilling. The historic drillholes, included in the drillhole database and utilized in current and past Mineral Resource estimations, have drilling, sampling and assaying techniques undertaken by several different entities and various representatives within each entity over time. The continuity of industry-standard techniques and procedures prevailing at that time cannot be confirmed and is assumed. To this end, information on the years before 2016 has been sourced from the previous Galaxy Resources technical report published in 2011 and compiled by Spiers et al (2011). The historical drilling phase is defined as Phase 1.
At Mt Cattlin, the host pegmatite is visually distinguishable from the surrounding country rock; therefore, sampling is taken selectively within RC chips and diamond core. Currently, 3 m of waste rock is sampled adjacent to the pegmatite to characterize the waste likely to be encountered during mining.
8.1 | On-site Sample Preparation Methods and Security |
8.1.1 | Phase 1 – Sampling Methods and Approach |
Historical drilling was completed using a combination of reverse circulation (RC) and diamond drilling (DD) techniques.
8.1.1.1 | Phase 1 – RC Sampling Protocols |
RC samples were split and collected in calico bags from a splitter at the drill rig. Sample bags were individually numbered, and sample numbers and drillhole details were recorded at the drillhole site. Dispatched samples were inserted into plastic bags, generally five calico bags per plastic bag, and sealed with cable ties.
The plastic bags were dispatched directly from Mt Cattlin to Esperance Freight Line’s (“EFL”) Ravensthorpe depot by the Field Supervisor or Geologist and transported by EFL to SGS Laboratories (“SGS”), WA. Upon receipt of the samples, SGS sorted and reconciled the samples compared to the provided paperwork. Reconciliation advice was provided to Galaxy detailing any missing or extra samples.
All sampling was conducted under the supervision of Galaxy senior personnel, either the Exploration Manager or Senior Geologist.
All drill core and RC samples were geologically and structurally logged, sampled, photographed, and stored at the core farm at Mt Cattlin or a storage facility in Perth.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Umpire check samples were submitted to Ultratrace and Genalysis Laboratories in Perth, WA.
8.1.1.2 | Phase 1 – DD Sampling Protocols |
Diamond drilling was carried out mainly for metallurgical, geotechnical, and geological purposes. The drill core size was typically HQ or PQ diameter. All angled diamond holes drilled by Galaxy were orientated using either an Ezy-Mark tool or, more recently, the Reflex ACT electronic orientation tool.
The drill core was collected from the rig site by Galaxy personnel and was orientated and meter marked. The core was then photographed both wet and dry before geological logging.
The drill core was sampled at an average interval of approximately 1 m to geologically consistent boundaries (pegmatite intervals), and an additional 1 m to 2 m of waste above and below the pegmatite was sampled. Samples collected from the drill core were predominantly quarter core with occasional half-core intervals.
Before cutting, drillholes GXMCGTD01-04 and GXD014-018 were also geotechnically and structurally logged by geologists from the geotechnical consultancy (Dempers & Seymour, 2008).
8.1.2 | Phase 2 – Sampling Methods and Approach |
Phase 2 involves Galaxy drilling from 2016 to current. A combination of RC and DD drilling methods has been utilized during the recent drilling programs.
8.1.2.1 | Phase 2 RC Sampling Protocols |
Most drilling at Mt Cattlin has used RC drilling methods, with the diamond drilling intervals assayed for Li2O representing 2.3% of the drillhole samples dataset.
RC samples have been collected from the cyclone at the drill rig using a cone splitter that feeds the sample into two calico bags, primary Sample A, and a duplicate Sample B (for QAQC or re-assaying purposes). Drillhole and depth information has been captured on the exterior of the sample bags.
The primary and QAQC samples selected for analysis have been placed into a second uniquely pre-numbered calico bag, ensuring all samples are double bagged. These samples are then placed into poly weave bags, typically 7–10 per bag, with information on the contents written on the outside. The poly weave bags are transported to the core yard and placed in large bulk bags, typically containing 200 samples. Each bulk bag has only one (1) sample submission, and batches are not split between bags. The bulk bags are dispatched by freight truck to the assay laboratory. Upon arrival at the assay laboratory,
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
the samples are sorted, and reconciliation advice is provided to Galaxy detailing any missing or extra samples.
All sampling has been carried out under the direction of Galaxy senior personnel comprising either the Exploration Manager or Senior Geologist.
The B Samples not utilized for assay analysis are stored in the sample farm for later analysis if further or repeat analysis is required.
8.1.2.2 | Phase 2 DD Sampling Protocols |
Samples have been taken to the pegmatite host lithological boundaries, and sample intervals do not cross these boundaries. Mineralization sample intervals vary from a minimum of 0.25 m to a maximum of 1.25 m, but sample interval lengths are adjusted to respect geology. Three meters of non-mineralized sample intervals are taken on either side of the pegmatite horizon.
Between 2016 and mid-2018, diamond drill core samples were sawn, predominately into half core but with some into quarter core. Since 2019, diamond sampling has been whole-core and used primarily for metallurgical testing.
Sample information has been recorded onto the field Toughbook laptop logging system using LogChief logging software which controls data input via a pick list, ensuring adherence to logging legends. The diamond drilling sampling information has been synced directly to the database.
Upon arrival at the assay laboratory, the samples are sorted, and reconciliation advice is provided to Galaxy detailing any missing or extra samples. The Geologist is responsible for the secure shipment to the laboratory of the samples at all times. All sampling has been carried out under the supervision of Galaxy senior personnel comprising either the Exploration Manager or Senior Geologist.
8.2 | Laboratory Sample Preparation and Analytical Methods |
8.2.1 | Phase 1 – Sample Preparation |
All samples sent to SGS were sorted, dried, crushed and pulverized to 90% passing 75 µm in a Labtech Essa LM5 pulveriser. Samples weighing over 3.5 kg were riffle split to 50% of the original weight. An approximately 200 g sub-sample was scooped from the entire pulverized sample.
The laboratory stored the sample pulps and coarse reject material. It returned them to Galaxy upon request, only after completing the initial sample analysis, and any additional checks Galaxy may have requested.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
8.2.2 | Phase 1 – Analytical Methods |
Samples from 2007 through to 2012 were analyzed at SGS Laboratories, WA, with check assaying undertaken by Ultratrace and Genalysis Laboratories in WA. Samples were routinely analyzed for Li2O by 4-Acid Digest with AAS measurement. Samples over the Li2O upper limit were re-analyzed using method AAS42S.
Additional elements were analyzed from selected diamond core samples including Cs, Rb, Ga, Be, and Nb by digesting samples using 4-Acid Digestion and element concentration determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (“ICP-MS”) method.
SGS undertook routine internal QAQC analyses and reported the internal laboratory pulp duplicate/repeat sample results to Galaxy.
8.2.3 | Phase 2 – Sample Preparation and Analytical Methods |
Since 2016, three laboratories have been used to analyze samples from Mt Cattlin.
8.2.3.1 | SGS Perth, WA (NATA Accreditation 1036) |
SGS Perth was initially used to conduct an analysis of samples from a small drilling program consisting of six (6) diamond drillholes. The sample preparation and analytical methods adopted are as follows:
● | Diamond drill core samples were crushed to produce less than 3 kg samples which were pulverized to 90% passing 75 µm using an LM5 mill. |
● | Several methods have been used to determine Li2O grades including: |
● | Li2O analytical technique 4 acid Digest AAS: |
o | Samples have been digested using Mixed 4-Acid Digest method with AAS Finish to determine Li2O concentration, with lower and upper detection limits of 5 ppm and 20,000 ppm, respectively. |
o | Li2O and Ta2O5 (also Cs, Nb and Rb) Mixed 4-Acid Digest analytical technique, ICP-MS: |
o | Samples have been digested using Mixed 4-Acid Digest method with ICP-MS Finish to determine Li2O concentration with lower and upper detection limits of 5 ppm and 20,000 ppm respectively. |
o | Li2O and Ta2O5 (also Cs, Nb and Rb) Sodium Peroxide Fusion analytical technique: |
o | Samples are digested using the sodium peroxide fusion method with ICP-MS Finish to determine Li2O concentration. |
o | Multi-element analysis for Fe2O3, K2O, MgO, Mn, Na2O, P2O5, S, SiO2, SnO2, TiO2, V2O5, Nb, Rb, Ta using XRF: |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
■ | Samples are fused into glass beads and analyzed for the suite of elements Fe2O3, K2O, MgO, Mn, Na2O, P2O5, S, SiO2, SnO2, TiO2, V2O5, Nb, Rb and Ta. |
8.2.3.2 | Intertek Perth WA (NATA Accreditation 3244) |
Intertek Perth, WA (“Intertek”) was used from 2017 to 2018 for both exploration and grade control sample preparation and analysis. The sample preparation and analysis comprised of:
● | RC samples were dried and pulverized in an LM5 to produce less than 3 kg at 85% passing 75 µm. Samples greater than 3 kg were dried and pre-split with a rotary splitting device prior to pulverizing. |
● | Diamond drill core samples were dried, crushed 10 mm and less than 3 kg pulverized to 85% passing 75 µm using an LM5 mill. |
● | Li2O and Ta2O5 were analyzed by subjecting samples to sodium peroxide fusion in a zircon crucible with ICP-MS/OES instrument finish. |
8.2.3.3 | Nagrom Perth WA (ISO9001 certified) |
Nagrom Perth WA laboratory (“Nagrom”) is the current analytical laboratory and has been used since 2018 for both exploration and grade control drilling programs.
The sample preparation and analytical techniques adopted by Nagrom are as follows:
● | RC chips are dried to 105C° and crushed to a nominal top size of 2 mm in a Terminator Jaw crusher. Subsamples up to 3 kg are pulverized in an LM5 mill to 80% passing 75 µm. If samples are greater than 3 kg, they are dried and split with a rotary splitting device before analysis. |
● | Diamond core is dried, crushed in a Terminator Jaw crusher to top size 6.3 mm, and pulverized in an LM5 mill up to 2.5 kg. If a sample is greater than 2.5 kg, the sample is riffle split after drying to reduce the sample size. |
● | For resource development drillholes sample pulverization is undertaken using an LM5 fitted with a tungsten carbide bowl to minimize iron contamination. Crushed materials are split to 0.5 kg prior to pulverizing using a stainless-steel riffle splitter. |
● | The analysis of Li2O and Ta2O5 was undertaken using method ICP004 or ICP005 and was completed as follows: |
o | Samples are digested using a sodium peroxide fusion digest in an alumina crucible (ICP004) or zirconium crucible (ICP005), |
o | Analysis by ICP-MS/OES. |
8.2.3.4 | Genalysis/Intertek (NATA Accreditation 3244) |
Both Intertek Perth and Intertek Kalgoorlie were used to speed up sample turnaround during 2022-2023:
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
● | RC chips are dried at 105 °C, crushed to nominal top-size of 2 mm in a Boyd or Orbis Jaw crusher (Code CRF01). Samples less than 1.2 kg are pulverized in an LM2 type mill with various bowls depending on the sample mass, at 85% or better passing 75 µm. Samples 1.2 k to 3 kg in a LM5 pulveriser mill at 85% or better passing 75 µm. If the sample mass exceeds 3 kg, the crusher product is split with a rotary splitter prior |
● | The analysis was completed as follows, the samples were digested in a sodium peroxide fusion within a Ni crucible with a MS, OES finish. The package is FP6-Li/OM19 for 19 elements (Lithium is the OES finish, all others are MS). |
8.3 | Quality Assurance and Quality Control Procedures |
8.3.1 | Phase 1 QAQC Procedures |
The exact Quality Assurance and Quality Control (“QAQC”) methodologies of some of the early protocols are not well documented, however, their approximate frequencies have been provided in Table 8-1.
8.3.2 | Phase 2 and later QAQC Procedures |
QAQC samples have been submitted routinely into all sample batches sent to the assaying laboratories. Mt Cattlin QAQC protocols have undergone several improvements since 2016. QAQC frequencies since 2017 are provided in Table 8-1 and Table 8-2.
Table 8-1 – Galaxy Phase 2 QC policies by year pre-2022.
Grade Control | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
STANDARD | approx. 1 in 60 to 70 | 1 in 25 | 1 in 25 | 1 in 25 | |
BLANK | approx. 1 in 60 to 70 | 1 in 25 (approx.) | 1 in 25 | 1 in 25 | |
DUPLICATE | approx. 1 in 60 to 70 | 1 in 25 | 1 in 25 | 1 in 25 | |
Exploration | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
STANDARD | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 25 |
BLANK | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 50 | 1 in 25 or one per mineralised interval minimum |
DUPLICATE | 1 in 20 | 1 in 20 | 1 in 20 | 1 in 20 | 1 in 20 |
Table 8-2 – Galaxy QA-QC by year -2022/33.
Laboratory | Samples | Field Duplicates | Field Duplicate Frequency | Blind CRM | Blind CRM frequency (inc. Filed Duplicates) |
Blind Blank (OREAS 27d) (inc. Filed Duplicates) |
Blind Blank Frequency | Lab Internal CRM | Grand Total CRM/ BLANKS |
Intertek Kalgoorlie | 4,794 | 364 | 13 | 287 | 18 | 224 | 23 | 226 | 737 |
Intertek Perth | 50 | 2 | 25 | 2 | 26 | - | - | - | 2 |
Nagrom | 1,216 | 77 | 16 | 54 | 24 | 43 | 30 | 140 | 237 |
Grand Total | 6,060 | 443 | 14 | 343 | 19 | 267 | 24 | 336 | 976 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
For 2022 two laboratories were used, Intertek/Genalysis (Kalgoorlie) and Nagrom (Perth). Overall field duplicate frequency was 1 per 14 samples, blind, 1 per 19 samples and blind blanks 1 per 24 samples, in line with 2021 frequency rates.
8.3.3 | Certified Reference Materials |
Since 2016, matrix-matched certified reference material (“CRM”) supplied by African Mineral Standards (“AMS”) has mostly been used in the determination of the underlying accuracy of the laboratory’s assaying procedures of exploration and resource development drilling. The CRMs were submitted with routine samples at the frequency indicated in Table 8-3 below, for 2022 drilling.
Table 8-3 – Galaxy QA-QC CRM 2022-3.
LAB | Submitted by Allkem | Lab Standards |
Intertek Kalgoorlie | AMIS0339 | MAIS0341 |
AMIS0340 | MAIS0342 | |
Blink Blank (OREAS 27d) | OREAS 146 | |
OREAS 147 | OREAS 147 | |
OREAS 148 | OREAS 148 | |
OREAS 750 | OREAS 753 | |
OREAS 751 | ||
Intertek Perth | OREAS 750 | |
OREAS 751 | ||
Nagrom | AMIS0339 | OREAS 147 |
AMIS0340 | OREAS 751 | |
Blink Blank (OREAS 27d) | OREAS 999 | |
OREAS 148 |
Ore Research and Exploration (“OREAS”) CRMs were used for monitoring drilling analytical accuracy. The OREAS CRMs used are Li2O and Ta2O5 bearing standards sourced from the Greenbushes mine in WA.
Not all CRM standards utilized are certified for Li2O analysis via by sodium peroxide fusion. Some of the CRMs were assigned only provisional values by AMS and were not relied on in assessing the analytical laboratory’s performance.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
8.3.4 | CRM Standard Transcription Errors |
Since 2016, 376 CRM transcription errors have occurred. Investigations confirmed the errors to be due to the misallocation of CRMs with Blanks. The remaining errors are attributed to either typographic errors or standard swaps.
All transcription errors have been rectified in the database and a record kept for all the remediation actions.
8.3.5 | Nagrom Li2O Results |
A total of 237 Li2O CRMs were submitted with routine samples to Nagrom for analysis, at a rate of approximately one per 24 routine samples. The overall performance of this CRM is considered satisfactory and indicates no significant bias or precision issues with the underlying assays reported by Nagrom.
8.3.6 | Nagrom Ta2O5 Results |
A total of 237 CRMs have been used to monitor the accuracy and precision of Ta2O5 of samples submitted to Nagrom for analysis, at an insertion rate of one per 24 routine samples.
The overall performance of the CRM is considered satisfactory, revealing no significant issues with the bias and precision of the underlying Ta2O5 assays reported.
8.3.7 | Intertek Li2O Results |
A total of 739 CRMs have been submitted with routine samples over the period to monitor the accuracy of reported Li2O results by Intertek. CRMs were submitted at a rate of one per 23 routine samples. Analysis of QAQC results indicates the satisfactory performance of Intertek laboratory with no significant grade bias underlying the assays.
8.3.8 | Intertek Ta2O5 Results |
To assess the accuracy of the reported Ta2O5 assays from Intertek, 739 CRMs were included with routine samples at a rate of one CRM per 23 routine samples. Analysis of the results received indicated satisfactory standard performance revealing no significant issues with the accuracy underlying the Ta2O5 assays.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
8.3.9 | SGS Li2O Results – pre-2022 |
A total of 60 CRMs have been used to monitor the accuracy of the SGS laboratory over the period. The CRMs were inserted at a rate of approximately one CRM per 9 routine samples. All but 13 of the CRM’s returned assays within the expected range of ± thrice the standard deviation of the certified CRM value.
The QPs consider the performance as acceptable as the risk to the Mineral Resource Estimate is minimal, since SGS has only been used for the analysis of only six (6) drillholes over a short period of time.
8.3.10 | SGS Ta2O5 Results |
A total of 60 CRM was submitted with routine samples for the analysis of Ta2O5 at SGS at a rate of approximately one (1) CRM per nine (9) routine samples.
Like the Li2O performance, all but 17 of the CRM’s returned values that were outside the expected range.
8.4 | Field Duplicates |
8.4.1 | Field Duplicates – RC |
The Sample B samples have been submitted as blind field duplicates from RC drillholes, at a rate of approximately one (1) per14 samples. During 2022 drilling, a total of 443 field duplicates were submitted with routine RC samples for assaying.
Analysis of field duplicate samples indicates satisfactory agreement between the original assay and the duplicate assay.
8.4.2 | Field Duplicates – DD |
Blind field duplicates are collected from diamond drillholes as quarter core samples and submitted at a rate of approximately one (1) per 16 routine samples. A total of 77 diamond core blind field duplicates were submitted for analysis during last phase of drilling.
Analysis of the diamond core field duplicate samples indicates that the original assay and the duplicate assay are in acceptable agreement.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
8.5 | Field Blanks |
Two different blanks have been included in batches submitted to Intertek to monitor contamination during sample preparation. From 2016 to December 2022, a coarse blank of unknown source and Li2O content was used, along with certified OREAS and AMIS coarse blanks. Two OREAS coarse blanks certified for 4 acid digests have been used at Mt Cattlin since April 2018.
Assays returned for blanks are generally satisfactory indicating no routine contamination during the sample preparation at any of the participating laboratories.
8.6 | Bulk Density Determinations |
Most drilling at Mt Cattlin has been completed using RC drilling which limits the opportunity to complete bulk density measurements. Bulk density determinations have been completed on the available diamond core to determine values using the water immersion method for use in Mineral Resource estimates.
The selection of bulk density samples is determined by the logging Geologist and the interval selected for bulk density measurement is dictated by material types. The diamond drill core is competent and does not display evidence of voids or vugs.
The method used for determining the bulk densities was the water immersion method. A coherent segment of diamond core, around 10 cm in length and representative of the meter interval, was selected for analysis. The weight of the segment of core was measured dry in air, and then measured when submerged in water. The bulk density values have been calculated using the formula from this data:
Where Wair = dry weight in air and Wwater = weight submerged in water
Samples in the weathered zones were wrapped in plastic wrap before being analyzed.
8.6.1 | Site Bulk Density Determinations |
Several phases of bulk density determinations have been undertaken in the past. Five density determinations were completed in 2001 and 2002 on un-waxed 10 cm lengths of HQ diamond core dried at 110°C for 2 hours, using the water immersion method. The samples were all from Ta2O5 mineralised pegmatite intervals.
In 2009, 270 bulk density measurements were completed on the diamond core from each meter of diamond drillholes GXMCMTD01 to GXMCMTD05, and GXD009 to GXD013. Using this data, Tornatora (2009) recommended values of 2.05 kg/m³ for soil/weathered material, down to a depth from 0 m to
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
7 m, (in the absence of a regolith model), 2.65 kg/m³ for fresh pegmatite, and 2.8 kg/m³ for fresh un-mineralised material.
During 2009/2010 bulk density measurements were completed on every meter of all additionally available diamond drill core, including the recently completed diamond drillholes. This work included drillholes GXD01 to GXD06, GXMCGTD01 to GXMCGTD04, and GXD014 to GXD018, and the data was added to the existing database of 270 readings, for a total of 963 measurements.
Results from the combined bulk density determination programs for the various regolith units and main rock types are summarized in Table 8-4.
Table 8-4 – Bulk density details by regolith and lithology.
8.6.2 | Nagrom Bulk Density Determinations |
Two (2) drillholes, NWRC064D and NWRC067D drilled in 2018, were submitted to Nagrom and tested using the Specific Gravity by hydrostatic weighing method – uncoated. The results of 95 pegmatite samples resulted in an average of 2.716 kg/m³. One single basalt reading returned a result of 2.84 kg/m³.
Non-mineralized lithology densities ranged from an average of 2.76 kg/m³ for felsic and intermediate volcanic rock to 3.00 kg/m³ for the Proterozoic dolerite. The predominant lithologies in the western portion of the orebody are basalt and dolerite, which average 2.88 kg/m³ and 2.94 kg/m³ respectively, while tonalite, with a bulk density of 2.82 kg/m³ is more common in the eastern portion of the project area.
8.7 | Adequacy of Sample Preparation and Analytical Procedures |
The sample preparation methods, security, assaying and QAQC control measures are appropriate for the type and style of mineralization at Mt Cattlin. The assay QAQC results, when taken together, demonstrates sufficient accuracy and precision for use in estimating Mineral Resource. Sampling and analysis have occurred within a chain of custody from the drill site to site dispatch and to laboratory receipt.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
The historic sampling, assaying and QAQC data, which is related to a small portion of the data within the drillhole database, has not been reviewed in detail or verified since a large portion cannot be located. This is not considered this a risk to the Mineral Resource or operation since most areas with large volumes of historical drillholes have already been mined.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
9. Data Verification
9.1 | Data Verification Procedures Used by the Qualified Person. |
An inspection of the property was made between July 11- 13, 2022, September 21-23, 2022, and December 12-14, 2022. This Chapter summarizes the observations made, plus associated recommendations.
9.1.1 | Geological Data Review |
The following prior activities have been completed at Mt Cattlin:
● | Verified seven (7) NW Area drillhole collars on the surface against the database entries, using the Allkem Survey department RTK GPS, |
● | Checked approximately 6% of the NW Area database entries against the csv and PDF certificates received directly from the assay laboratory, with no errors identified, |
● | Performed a review of the database entries against the downhole surveys noted in the driller’s logs and provided by external surveying companies, with three (3) errors identified in one (1) drillhole, |
● | Undertook check-logging to confirm database entries in 11 NW Area drillholes, with no errors identified, |
● | Observed sample storage and chain-of-custody procedures, |
● | Discussed the geological interpretation with key people on site. |
● | Maintained an active drilling tracker during the 2022 program that monitored the progress of drilling, logging and assay dispatch and receipt. |
A review of the geological logging and sampling procedures was not completed since no drill rigs were onsite at the time of the inspection. However, the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for RC geological logging, drillhole establishment and sampling have been reviewed.
The data verification checks were completed on pre-2022 drillholes located in the NW Area since the majority of drillholes located in the other portions of the deposit have been impacted by surface disturbance and/or mining.
The following observations have been made:
● | Checking the collar coordinates between the RTK GPS resurvey collar locations and the database entries did not reveal any inconsistencies, with all results within 10 cm of the original survey, (Table 9-1), |
● | Cross-checking of the assays between the database and original PDF certificates did not reveal any database errors, however the source data for one drillhole could not be located, (Table 9-2), |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
● | Checking the downhole survey source data files against the database was completed on five of the eleven selected drillholes, since the source data files for several drillholes could not be located or the drillhole had not been downhole surveyed. The audit identified three inconsistencies in one drillhole (Table 9-3). |
● | Drillhole RC chip trays were reviewed for logging in the 11 NW Area audit drillholes. No issues were identified (Table 9-4). |
Table 9-1 – NW Area collar resurvey results.
Database | Re-survey | Difference (m) | |||||||||
Hole ID | East | North | RL | Hole ID | East | North | RL | Hole ID | East | North | RL |
NWRC085 | 224,120.20 | 6,282,340.12 | 268.191 | NWRC085 | 224,120.21 | 6,282,340.17 | 268.26 | NWRC085 | -0.01 | -0.05 | -0.07 |
NWRC091 | 224,207.66 | 6,282,399.09 | 267.894 | NWRC091 | 224,207.60 | 6,282,399.02 | 267.95 | NWRC091 | 0.05 | 0.07 | -0.06 |
NWRC100 | 224,219.87 | 6,282,518.49 | 266.851 | NWRC100 | 224,219.85 | 6,282,518.55 | 266.90 | NWRC100 | 0.02 | -0.07 | -0.05 |
NWRC101 | 224,222.25 | 6,282,578.99 | 265.351 | NWRC101 | 224,222.27 | 6,282,579.04 | 265.42 | NWRC101 | -0.02 | -0.05 | -0.07 |
NWRC106 | 224,202.12 | 6,282,487.56 | 267.775 | NWRC106 | 224,202.13 | 6,282,487.59 | 267.73 | NWRC106 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.04 |
NWRC108 | 224,356.81 | 6,282,465.85 | 260.381 | NWRC108 | 224,356.87 | 6,282,465.92 | 260.45 | NWRC108 | -0.05 | -0.08 | -0.07 |
NWST003 | 223,898.98 | 6,282,834.78 | 259.16 | NWST003 | 223,898.98 | 6,282,834.82 | 259.16 | NWST003 | -0.01 | -0.04 | 0.00 |
Table 9-2 – Drillhole assay audit results.
Hole ID | Hole Type | Max Depth | Date Started | Date Completed | Assay data status | Audit Outcome |
GX1097 | RC | 135 | 24/02/2010 | 24/02/2010 | supplied | No errors identified |
GX1113 | RC | 120 | 20/04/2010 | 20/04/2010 | source file could not be located | NA |
NWST012 | RC | 84 | 19/09/2017 | 19/09/2017 | supplied | No errors identified |
NWST003 | RC | 84 | 23/09/2017 | 24/09/2017 | supplied | No errors identified |
NWRC022 | RC | 225 | 26/08/2018 | 28/08/2018 | supplied | No errors identified |
NWRC051 | RC | 180 | 5/10/2018 | 6/10/2018 | supplied | No errors identified |
NWRC066 | RC | 186 | 20/10/2018 | 22/10/2018 | supplied | No errors identified |
NWRC071 | RC | 222 | 30/10/2018 | 31/10/2018 | supplied | No errors identified |
NWRC085 | RC | 228 | 5/02/2019 | 6/02/2019 | supplied | No errors identified |
NWRC100 | RC | 130 | 23/02/2021 | 23/02/2021 | supplied | No errors identified |
NWRC108 | RC | 170 | 8/03/2021 | 8/03/2021 | supplied | No errors identified |
Table 9-3 – Drillhole downhole survey audit results.
Hole ID | Hole Type | Max Depth | Date Started | Date Completed | Survey Data Status | Audit Outcome |
GX1097 | RC | 135 | 24/02/2010 | 24/02/2010 | source file could not be located | NA |
GX1113 | RC | 120 | 20/04/2010 | 20/04/2010 | source file could not be located | NA |
NWST012 | RC | 84 | 19/09/2017 | 19/09/2017 | source file could not be located | NA |
NWST003 | RC | 84 | 23/09/2017 | 24/09/2017 | source file could not be located | NA |
NWRC022 | RC | 225 | 26/08/2018 | 28/08/2018 | supplied | No errors identified |
NWRC051 | RC | 180 | 5/10/2018 | 6/10/2018 | supplied | 3 errors identified |
NWRC066 | RC | 186 | 20/10/2018 | 22/10/2018 | source file could not be located | NA |
NWRC071 | RC | 222 | 30/10/2018 | 31/10/2018 | supplied | No errors identified |
NWRC085 | RC | 228 | 5/02/2019 | 6/02/2019 | not surveyed | NA |
NWRC100 | RC | 130 | 23/02/2021 | 23/02/2021 | supplied | No errors identified |
NWRC108 | RC | 170 | 8/03/2021 | 8/03/2021 | supplied | No errors identified |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Hole ID | Chip Trays Present | Chips Match Database Geology |
GX1097 | yes | yes |
GX1113 | yes | yes |
NWRC022 | yes | yes |
NWRC051 | yes | yes |
NWRC066 | yes | yes |
NWRC071 | yes | yes |
NWRC085 | yes | yes |
NWRC100 | yes | yes |
NWRC108 | yes | yes |
NWST003 | yes | yes |
NWST012 | yes | yes |
9.1.2 | Adequacy of the Data Used for the Purpose of the Technical Report Summary |
The geological data used to inform the Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource estimate was largely collected, validated, and stored in line with industry best practice as defined in the CIM Mineral Exploration Best Practice Guidelines (CIM, 2018) and the CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines (CIM, 2019), with some minor issues identified, which are not considered material. It is of the opinion of the Albert Thamm (QP) that the CIM best practice guidelines comply with the S-K 1300 regulations. Therefore, the data is deemed suitable for use in the estimation of Mineral Resources.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
10. Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
10.1 | Processing Plant |
The Mt Cattlin processing plant was originally designed and constructed based on the Definitive Feasibility Study metallurgical test work completed in 2009. The constructed plant effectively processed mined ore to produce saleable spodumene product until entering a period of care and maintenance due to depressed lithium prices in 2013. Following the recommencement of operations in 2016, the Mt Cattlin operation has demonstrated the ability to produce saleable spodumene concentrate from fresh pegmatite ore at recoveries in the range of 55-60% as per Table 10-1 Periods of lower plant recoveries have been attributable to processing weathered mineralization from the early phases of the SW pit in (Q3/4 2018) and processing predominantly contaminated ore stockpiles through the majority of 2022 prior to processing fresh ore from the NW pit in late 2022.
Table 10-1 – Mt Cattlin Spodumene Concentrate Production and Recovery Data.
Period | Concentrate Tonnes | Grade Li2O | Recovery % |
CY 2017 | 155,679 | 5.7 | 55.7 |
CY 2018 | 156,689 | 5.8 | 50.2 |
CY 2019 | 191,660 | 5.9 | 55.3 |
CY 2020 | 108,659 | 5.9 | 54.3 |
CY 2021 | 230,065 | 5.7 | 59.8 |
CY 2022 | 107,416 | 5.3 | 47.6 |
Q1, 2023 | 38,915 | 5.3 | 60.0 |
Since 2017, several metallurgical test work programs and plant optimization projects have been undertaken to optimize plant throughput, recovery, and product quality. These testwork programs are broken into two groups in the remainder of this Chapter. Firstly, programs supporting plant optimization programs, and secondly programs supporting the recovery forecasts used in the NW pit area for the Stage 4 pit reserves and economics.
10.2 | Plant Optimization Projects |
10.2.1 | Yield Optimization Project |
In 2017, heavy liquid separation (HLS) test work was initiated at the Nagrom commercial laboratory to study the potential to recover spodumene from the secondary DMS floats reject material through additional liberation and reprocessing of fines, which is where the majority of spodumene losses occur. Samples of crushed ore and secondary floats were collected from the plant in July 2017 and submitted to Nagrom for testing. HLS test work was performed on the +5.6 mm and 1 mm to 5.6 mm fractions of
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
the crushed ore, the secondary floats material as received and after further crushing to 0.5 mm to 4.0 mm and 1.7 mm to 3.0 mm size fractions. The HLS results are shown in Figure 10-1 and demonstrate the improvement in recovery from the secondary floats material after crushing.
The re-liberation circuit was consequently implemented in the processing plant in 2018 and featured a Vertical Shaft Impactor (VSI) crusher to crush the secondary floats stream and recycle the resulting material through the DMS circuits. This circuit contributes up to 2-3% additional plant recovery.
The second component to the yield optimization project (YOP) was the addition of the ultrafine dense media separation circuit (UFDMS), to recover material below -1.8 mm previously reporting to tailings after the Tantalite recovery process. Since commissioning, the UFDMS has run when operationally beneficial adding approximately a further 2-3% recovery overall, often at slightly lower product grades to the main DMS at approximately 4.5% Li2O%. The UFDMS circuit provides most benefit when the plant is processing clean, high-grade ore, and is less effective on basalt contaminated low-grade plant feed.
Figure 10-1 – 2017 HLS Test Work Results.
10.2.2 | Recovery Improvement Project |
In early 2020 it was determined that mined contaminated ore stockpiles and other ore sources stockpiled would need to be processed due to the size of the stockpiles and restrictions in the mining sequence for fresh ore. A program of laboratory test work was conducted to evaluate the optimum DMS plant settings for processing this material. Once the optimum recovery parameters were established, batch tests were
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
conducted to determine the spodumene recovery that could be achieved as a function of Contaminated ore blend composition. Results of these evaluations are shown in Table 10-2. The Project allowed the subsequent economic processing of stockpiled material that was previously defined as waste or unrecoverable. In CY 2022 the high basalt contaminated ore and oxidized ore were processed economically either through the optical sorter (more description in 10.2.3) or where possible directly feed to the plant.
Table 10-2 – Feedstock and Plant Samples – HLS and DMS Results.
Material | Feed Grd | BP Feed | d50 | % Yield | % Recov | Prod Grd HLS |
BP Prod | Prod Grd Plant |
Feed Stock HLS results | ||||||||
OSPFS | 2.98 | 12 | 78 | 6.0 | ||||
COFS | 3.01 | 9 | 58 | 6.0 | ||||
SF DST FS | 2.98 | 5 | 35 | 6.0 | ||||
OSPFS | 2.90 | 13 | 88 | 5.0 | ||||
COFS | 2.90 | 14 | 81 | 4.5 | ||||
SF DST FS | 2.90 | 10 | 56 | 4.8 | ||||
DMS Feed D/S HLS results | ||||||||
4OS/1SF/5ROM | 0.99 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 14.5 | 73.2 | 5.0 | 10.9 | |
4OS/1SF/SROM | 1.03 | 7.9 | 2.9 | 16.5 | 79.9 | 5.2 | 11.6 | |
4OS/1SF/5ROM | 1.02 | 10.1 | 2.9 | 16.0 | 77.5 | 5.0 | 11.4 | |
4OS/1SF/5ROM | 1.06 | 8.3 | 2.9 | 18.1 | 86.3 | 5.3 | 9.5 | |
4OS/1SF | 1.01 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 16.9 | 76.1 | 4.7 | 11.8 | |
OS only | 1.00 | 12.3 | 2.9 | 16.1 | 72.9 | 4.7 | 16.3 | |
DMS Feed D/S Plant results | ||||||||
4OS/1SF/SROM | 1.05 | 9.1 | 5.9 | 5.6 | ||||
4OS/1SF/5ROM | 1.06 | 8.8 | 5.8 | 5.6 | ||||
4OS/1SF/5ROM | 0.92 | 9.7 | 5.5 | 5.8 | ||||
4OS/1SF/5ROM | 0.92 | 9.7 | 5.5 | 5.9 | ||||
4OS/1SF (D/S average data) | 1.22 | 9.1 | 6.0 | 5.6 | ||||
OS only (D/S average data) | 1.22 | 9.1 | 6.0 | 5.4 |
10.2.3 | Optical Sorting |
A significant portion of the ore mined at Mt Cattlin contains basalt content between 10% and 24%. A basalt head grade of higher than ~3% to the process plant presents major processing challenges, as it has a similar SG to spodumene and is therefore not effectively separated by DMS.
Optical sorter test work was undertaken by Optosort in Austria in 2017 on Mt Cattlin ROM crushed product and final product. The test work results indicated the basalt material could be rejected to
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
produce a final stream sufficiently low in basalt to feed to the processing plant. Two crushing optical sorter units and a single Product Quality Upgrade (PQU) sorter were purchased during 2018 for Mt Cattlin.
A series of test programs on the crushing optical sorter application through 2018 and 2019 demonstrated the design throughput and basalt rejection could not be achieved in a single stage of sorting. This led to the revision of the design basis from two sorters in parallel to two sorters operating in series, as summarized in Table 10-3.
Table 10-3 – Crushing Ore Sorter Design Basis.
The front-end optical ore sorters were commissioned in early 2020 and by Q3 had consistently achieved targets of contributing 1 ktpd of ore sorted and up to 30% of total plant throughput.
Due to the requirement to process a large stockpile of basalt contaminated ore that had been accumulated over several years, further test work was conducted with a TOMRA laser sorter and in October 2021 Mt Cattlin commissioned a hire unit to significantly increase ore sorting capacity. The TOMRA laser sorter performed above expectations consistently producing below 3% basalt with less than 5% spodumene loss. This significant improvement led to the replacement of the parallel optical sorters with a single TOMRA laser unit in February 2022.
10.3 | Recovery Forecasts and NW Pit Metallurgical Test work |
Plant recovery estimates used in the economic assessment of reserves are based on grade-recovery curves that were derived from historical plant performance and reflect a range of plant feed grades and concentrate grades.
Theoretical grade recovery curves were established from actual daily plant data of yields in a 2021, these curves are shown in Figure 10-2 below.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 10-2 – Theoretical grade recovery curves, using actual daily plant data from 2021.
These curves were then used as a base for establishing forecast grade recovery curves with adjustments made from actual plant recovery results, a 2-5% discount was generally seen against the theoretical curves and incorporated in the forecasts.
The example chart below, Figure 10-3shows the actual curves used, at 5.4% concentrate grade, for the reserves update and economic study. Note that the curves are re-presented on a feed grade/ recovery basis below.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 10-3 – Mt Cattlin Grade-Recovery Curves.
Certain periods were excluded from the study, notably the period from April 2022 through to January 2023 were not considered in the analysis as plant performance during this period was heavily impacted by delays to the NW pit ore delivery schedule which impacted the “representivity” of ore deliveries.
During this time, the process plant initially treated primarily contaminated (high basalt) feed stocks, resulting in low plant recoveries ranging from 20-50%, and in December 2022 and January 2023 fine-grained mineralization was processed also impacting recoveries during this period. These issues materially impacted plant recoveries until more typical (deeper lens) feed material was delivered from stage 2 and Stage 3, as the pit progressed deeper in February 2023 onwards.
Since that time plant recoveries have been in line with expectations and consistently exceeded expectation and 60% recoveries
A target concentrate grade of 5.4% Lithia was used in the economic evaluations of the pit reserves.
10.3.1 | NW Pit HLS Test Work |
10.3.1.1 | 2021 Metallurgical Testing |
In April 2021, HLS test work was performed on drill core samples from the NW Pit, which was intended to become the primary plant feed source from mid-2022. Mineralised sections of drill core consisting of spodumene-containing pegmatite were selected for testing. This is the only mineralization being targeted for mining and processing, and it is comparable to material which has already been successfully processed through the processing plant as well as the remaining mineralization in the NW Pit.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Analysis was undertaken by Nagrom Perth (ISO9001 accreditation) and comprised XRD, and head assay as well as HLS.
Heavy liquid separation (HLS) is a technique used to separate materials of different specific gravity (SG) through the effects of buoyancy. A mineral sample is added to a liquid with a very high SG such as bromoform, tetrabromoethane or a tungsten-based heavy liquid. Particles with an SG lower than that of the liquid will float to the surface, whereas particles with an SG higher than that of the liquid will separate and sink to the bottom. HLS is used in metallurgical test work to determine a sample’s amenability to dense medium separation (DMS), which is the principal method in use in the Mt Cattlin processing plant.
The samples were crushed to -14 mm and wet screened at 1.8 mm. The oversize material was separated at specific gravities of 2.7, 2.8 and 2.9 using HLS. The 2.9 SG results are shown in Table 10-4 and demonstrate the mineralised ore upgrades well with high sinks grades achieved (6.0-6.5% Li2O). The recoveries observed in the test work were higher than likely plant recoveries due to the absence of dilutant material in the test work samples. Nonetheless the results were deemed to demonstrate the NW pit ore was likely to demonstrate comparable metallurgical performance to historical Mt Cattlin operations.
Table 10-4 – NW Pit HLS Results Summary (2.9 SG).
Sample | Head
Grade % Li2O |
Yield % | Sinks
Grade % Li2O |
Sinks
Grade % Fe2O3 |
Recovery % |
NWRCD090 | 1.85 | 22.1 | 6.46 | 1.24 | 77.1 |
NWRCD102 | 1.05 | 12.7 | 6.06 | 1.34 | 72.8 |
10.3.1.2 | 2022 Geometallurgical Testwork |
Geometallurgical studies undertaken in 2022 included HLS testing and supported the understanding of metallurgical responses of the pegmatites in the Stage 4 area. The testwork was completed at Nagrom in Perth WA.
Samples were taken from drilling conducted in 2021 for geotechnical studies, the hole locations are provided in the geotechnical section of this report. Chapter 7 shows the hole locations the holes identifiers and metallurgical sample number are listed in Table 10-5 below.
Table 10-5 – 2022 Metallurgical Samples and Hole Identifiers.
2022 Geometallurgical Testing | ||
Hole ID | Headgrade | Hole ID’s |
FPEG 10 | 0.25% | GTNW05B, GTN01, GTNW03 |
FPEG 12 | 0.27% | GTN05B |
FPEG 20s | 1.69% | GTNW05B, GTNW01, GTNW03 |
FPED >30 | 0.94% |
GTN05B, GTN01, GTN03 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
The metallurgical samples were selected to reflect major geometallurgical domains, targeting fine-grained mineralization (FPEG10/FPEG12 domains) and coarse-grained mineralization represented by the FPEG20 and FPEG>30 domains. Noting the grades of FPEG 10 and FPEG12 were below the cut-off used to determine resources and reserves.
The results of the HLS work are shown in Table 10-6, which presents combined grade and recovery from the HLS sinks at a specific gravity of 2.9 to allow direct comparison with the 2021 results. Concentrate grade and recovery values also combine results received for individual HLS analysis of the coarse (-14 mm / +6.3 mm) and fine (-6.3 mm / + 2.0 mm) fractions, providing further consistency with the results reported in Table 10-6.
Table 10-6 – NW Stage 4 HLS Results.
Sample | Head Grade (% Li2O) | Yield (%) | Sinks Grade (% Li2O) | Sinks Grade (% Fe2O3) | Recovery (%) |
FPEG10A | 0.26 | 2.2 | 5.86 | 1.17 | 49.6 |
FPEG12B | 0.19 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 1.47 | 43 |
FPEG20S | 1.81 | 22.6 | 6.33 | 1.29 | 79.1 |
FPEG>30 | 0.88 | 9 | 6.34 | 0.9 | 65 |
The 2022 HLS results are consistent with the expected metallurgical performance of the deposit, with HLS sinks grades and recoveries at a specific gravity of 2.9 demonstrating typical grade-recovery responses. Specifically fine grained, low grade (<0.3% Li2O) samples demonstrated reduced HLS sinks grade and recovery (5.5-5.8% Li2O at 43-49% recovery), with sinks grades exceeding 6% Li2O and recoveries of 65-79% achieved on higher grade (0.9-1.8% Li2O), coarse grained mineralization.
10.3.1.3 | 2023 Metallurgical Testing and Drilling |
Figure 10-4 below, shows the location of drill holes and list of hole identifiers for metallurgical testwork in the NW pit area including the 2023 holes for which metallurgical results were not available at the time of reserves estimation.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 10-4 – Location of drillholes for metallurgical testwork in the NW pit area.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Five (5) drill core intervals have been selected from the NW Stage 4 pit resource and submitted to Nagrom for HLS testing in 2023. The drillhole locations are shown on the preceding image. The core intervals are illustrated in Figure 10-5.
Figure 10-5 – NW Pit Stage 4 Metallurgical Samples.
10.3.2 | Tailings Recovery Test Work |
Early test work programs have been undertaken to evaluate the potential to recover spodumene from the -1.5 mm component of the Mt Cattlin tailings. These programs have evolved to target a more economically viable solution than conventional flotation, which is the typical approach to fine spodumene recovery. The use of coarse particle flotation, such as the Eriez HydroFloat® technology, has the potential to substantially reduce capital and operating costs by eliminating conventional grinding and multiple stages of flotation from the flowsheet. Results from HydroFloat® test work performed on Mt Cattlin tailings samples has demonstrated the potential to produce a saleable spodumene concentrate grade as shown in.
Table 10-7.
Two samples, noted as Stages 1 and 2 in the table were tested. The economic analysis inputs are supported by the +212um results in the testwork. A 30% recovery at 4.5% Li2O was assumed for economic analysis.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Table 10-7 – HydroFloat Results, Mt Cattlin Tailings.
Process | Size Class | Stage 1 Program (Grade + Recovery) | Stage 2 Program (Grade + Recovery) |
HydroFloat | + 710 µm | 2.6% Li2O @ 3.7% | 4.7% Li2O @ 27.4% |
HydroFloat | + 500 µm | 4.6% Li2O @ 11.8% | 4.3% Li2O @ 18.2% |
HydroFloat | + 212 µm | 5.4% Li2O @ 46.7% | 4.4% Li2O @ 43.7% |
Conventional Flotation | - 212 µm | 2.7% Li2O @ 49.3% | 2.6% Li2O @ 59.9% |
Ongoing test work is evaluating the combination of the CrossFlow® separator technology to remove ultrafine ahead of the HydroFloat stage, and to replace deslime cyclones in the tailings treatment flowsheet.
10.3.3 | Summary of Metallurgical Testwork and Recovery Forecasts |
Since the restart in 2016, Mt Cattlin has produced and exported more than 1Mt of Spodumene concentrate via the Port of Esperance. The current NW pit is the 5th separate open pit taken into production. Product specification (with target SC grades 5 - 6% lithia) has changed from time to time and this has allowed the Process plant to develop empirical and specific statistical regression curves based on Mt Cattlin lithia head grade and desired product lithia grade. Bench scale HLS test work is not an exact proxy for plant recovery, HLS test work is a reliable predictor of mineral separation, based on density, which is a good indicator of DMS plants cyclone performance although cyclones are less efficient than HLS separation.
● | The significant processing experience together with more recent advances in geometallurgical understanding has improved Mt Cattlin’s definition of poorly performing (Fine grained) ore types in the reserves. Grain size of the spodumene in the pegmatite is a very good indicator of fine-grained problematic ores that show high lithia values but very few large grains of spodumene. The 2022 geometallurgical test work, (~350 kg mass), by pegmatite mineralization type, confirmed recoveries and head grades for the main ORE types at Mt Cattlin. Although there is relatively limited testwork performed on the NW pit area, (note that was no specific sampling of the of lower pegmatite at the time of the reserve generation) the understanding of ore types provides support for the assumption that Stage 4 reserves will be similar to historic. |
● | The forecast recoveries have been built up from operating experience, considering the understanding of the causes of poor recovery in some mineralization types. |
● | Recent mining experience in 2023, in the Stage 3 pit has shown recoveries in line with, at times exceeding, the forecasts. |
Additional test samples had been selected from new drilling conducted across the Stage 4 pit in early 2023 however results were not available at the time of reserve generation. The results of this testwork are expected to be available to assess before the Stage 4 mining advances.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
11. Mineral Resource Estimates
The Mt Cattlin 2023 Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) update represents the combination of two Mineral Resource Estimate updates completed at different times by Mining Plus in 2021 and 2022. The updates were made to the Northwest (“NW” or “Area 6”) and Southwest (“SW” or “Area 3”) region of the deposit which have then been merged with the pre-existing block model and supporting data.
The “combined” MRE has been depleted by mining as of June 30, 2023, for the reporting of Mineral Resources in this document.
This Chapter documents the work undertaken to support the MRE update released on 1 August 2023 to the ASX, bringing the MRE effective to 30 June 2023 and reported in the August 2023 NI 43-101.
11.1 | Key Assumptions, Parameters, and Methods |
11.1.1 | Drillhole Data |
The drillhole database provided for the Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource update contains 4,158 drillholes, many of which are historical drillholes.
The drillhole dataset for the NW and SW areas contains 3,232 drillholes, for 175,950 meters, comprised of a combination of RC, DD, and RC with a diamond tail (“RC_DDT”) drillholes.
The dominant drillhole type is RC, representing over 95% of the drill meters being from RC drillholes (Table 11-1).
Table 11-1 – NW and SW Area drillhole details.
Hole Type | Count | Meters | % Drillholes | % Meters |
DDH | 45 | 5,437.80 | 1.40% | 3.10% |
RC | 3,173 | 169,037.80 | 98.20% | 96.10% |
RC_DDT | 14 | 1,474.40 | 0.40% | 0.80% |
TOTAL | 3,232 | 175,950.00 | 100.00% | 100.00% |
A high-level validation of this data, including checking for overlapping intervals, non-matching end-of-hole records, obvious downhole survey discrepancies and obvious collar location issues was undertaken.
All below-detection assay results have been set to half the detection limit and set to positive.
The drillhole spacing for the NW and SW areas has been predominantly a 40 mE by 40 mN grid (Figure 11-1).
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 11-1 – Plan view of the drillhole collars and updated Pegmatite wireframes.
11.1.2 | Interpretation and Modelling |
11.1.2.1 | Geological Domains |
the pre-existing geological wireframe interpretations incorporating the additional drillholes within the NW and SW areas and improved geological understanding of the region were updated for the 2023 estimations.
As the size of the spodumene crystals within the pegmatites can cause issues during processing, these were differentiated as coarse and fine-grained spodumene zones within the NW and SW areas by creating
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
separate wireframe domains to delineate the coarse-grained mineralized spodumene within the pegmatite wireframes.
The geological interpretation exercise resulted in a total of 13 individual pegmatite domains and one intrusive dolerite modelled and used to control the block model estimation process.
11.1.2.2 | Weathering Surfaces |
Two weathering wireframe surfaces, to delineate fresh rock, partially weathered or transitional material and completely oxidized rock horizons.
11.1.2.3 | Mineralized Domains |
The Li₂O grade distributions within the pegmatite geological indicate the presence of mineral zonation and differentiation into high and low-grade lithia zones. Mining Plus utilized the following indicators to generate wireframes that capture the internal mineralized portion of the pegmatite:
● | Na₂O less than 4% excluded on the periphery, |
● | Geology logging of coarse-grained pegmatite, |
● | Li₂O less than 0.3% excluded on the periphery. |
The modelling of these zones has been completed utilizing Leapfrog Geo software and explicitly modelling the internal coarse-grained and mineralized spodumene (Figure 11-2).
Figure 11-2 – Cross-section showing an example of Na2O grades informing the boundary between the mineralized pegmatites and the fine-grained skins.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
The mineralization modelling exercise resulted in a total of 13 individual pegmatite mineralization domains for the Northwest and Southwest area MRE Update.
11.1.2.4 | Domain Coding |
The wireframes and surfaces have been used to code the drillhole database and block model by pegmatite, mineralization, and weathering.
Coding was applied to the drillhole data and block model to define the following:
● | Pegmatite flag – modelled pegmatite domain code, |
● | Mineralization –low-grade Li2O and high-grade Li2O domains, |
● | Weathering – oxidized, transitional, or fresh material. |
11.1.2.5 | Statistical Analysis and Variography |
A contact boundary analysis has been undertaken to confirm the treatment of samples across the weathering zones during estimation for each element estimated. In domains where there is no statistical difference across the weathering boundaries, domains have been grouped for estimation purposes.
A grouped code flag has been generated to enable domains to be grouped by weathering profile and pegmatite domains to analyze and estimate Li₂O%.
Boundary analysis on Ta2O5 and Fe2O3 showed no requirement to control the estimation by weathering profile.
11.1.2.6 | Data Compositing |
Analysis of the raw drillhole sample intervals indicates the predominant sampled length is 1 m, with more than 99% of the total samples being 1 m or less.
A composite sample length of 1 m was considered appropriate for use in the Mineral Resource estimate update. Domain-flagged 1 m downhole composites have been extracted for all mineralised domains in the compositing process with a 0.1 m residual.
A comparison between the raw and composite sample statistics for the estimation domains by element are provided in Table 11-2, Table 11-3 and Table 11-4. Highlighted cells indicate domains with high coefficients of variation (CV).
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Table 11-2 – Comparison statistics between raw and composite samples for the Li2O estimation domains.
Element | Code | No. Samples | Mean Grade | Std Dev | Coeff Variation | |||||
Raw | Comp | Raw | Comp | % Diff | Raw | Comp | Raw | Comp | ||
Li2O | 3103 | 216 | 203 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 4.00% | 0.60 | 0.57 | 1.63 | 1.41 |
3113 | 295 | 276 | 1.25 | 1.24 | 0.20% | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.70 | |
3203 | 72 | 71 | 0.33 | 0.33 | -0.90% | 0.42 | 0.42 | 1.27 | 1.26 | |
3213 | 35 | 31 | 1.09 | 1.06 | 2.50% | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.62 | |
3301 | 51 | 49 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 1.30% | 0.72 | 0.73 | 1.31 | 1.35 | |
3302 | 452 | 428 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 1.10% | 0.46 | 0.46 | 1.70 | 1.70 | |
3303 | 455 | 435 | 0.35 | 0.35 | -2.00% | 0.48 | 0.49 | 1.39 | 1.39 | |
3311 | 99 | 95 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 0.10% | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.47 | 0.47 | |
3312 | 419 | 389 | 1.01 | 1.01 | -0.50% | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | |
3313 | 778 | 736 | 1.19 | 1.18 | 0.60% | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.65 | |
3401 | 51 | 51 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.80% | 0.57 | 0.57 | 1.51 | 1.51 | |
3402 | 393 | 378 | 0.20 | 0.20 | -0.50% | 0.36 | 0.36 | 1.84 | 1.81 | |
3403 | 6 | 6 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00% | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.92 | 0.92 | |
3411 | 14 | 14 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.00% | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.49 | |
3412 | 144 | 138 | 1.09 | 1.10 | -0.80% | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.64 | |
3502 | 140 | 130 | 0.27 | 0.29 | -4.20% | 0.52 | 0.54 | 1.91 | 1.88 | |
3503 | 69 | 65 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 4.50% | 0.14 | 0.14 | 1.24 | 1.26 | |
3512 | 85 | 84 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.90% | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.72 | |
3513 | 42 | 42 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.00% | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.74 | |
3603 | 16 | 15 | 0.32 | 0.32 | -1.60% | 0.43 | 0.44 | 1.37 | 1.38 | |
3613 | 7 | 6 | 0.68 | 0.73 | -6.80% | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.74 | 0.73 | |
3703 | 104 | 101 | 0.61 | 0.61 | -0.20% | 0.64 | 0.65 | 1.05 | 1.07 | |
3713 | 119 | 115 | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.30% | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.65 | 0.64 | |
3803 | 24 | 23 | 0.35 | 0.36 | -1.90% | 0.39 | 0.40 | 1.11 | 1.11 | |
3813 | 24 | 23 | 1.81 | 1.76 | 2.70% | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.48 | 0.48 | |
3903 | 15 | 15 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.00% | 0.22 | 0.22 | 1.15 | 1.15 | |
3913 | 9 | 8 | 1.02 | 1.14 | -10.60% | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.74 | |
6103 | 1,000 | 902 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 1.60% | 0.54 | 0.52 | 1.39 | 1.37 | |
6113 | 1,602 | 1,463 | 1.39 | 1.39 | -0.40% | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.63 | 0.63 | |
6203 | 696 | 615 | 0.48 | 0.50 | -3.00% | 0.66 | 0.68 | 1.38 | 1.37 | |
6213 | 751 | 685 | 1.57 | 1.56 | 0.80% | 1.10 | 1.10 | 0.67 | 0.70 | |
6303 | 100 | 91 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 7.50% | 0.80 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
6313 | 147 | 139 | 1.46 | 1.47 | -0.70% | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.53 | 0.53 | |
6403 | 23 | 16 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 8.40% | 0.49 | 0.49 | 1.64 | 1.79 | |
6413 | 9 | 8 | 1.68 | 1.78 | -5.30% | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.43 | 0.40 | |
33023303 | 907 | 863 | 0.31 | 0.31 | -0.60% | 0.47 | 0.48 | 1.53 | 1.53 | |
33123313 | 1,349 | 1,125 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.20% | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.66 | |
34023403 | 399 | 384 | 0.19 | 0.20 | -1.00% | 0.36 | 0.36 | 1.86 | 1.82 | |
35023503 | 209 | 195 | 0.22 | 0.23 | -3.10% | 0.44 | 0.46 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Table 11-3 – Comparison statistics between raw and composite samples for the Ta2O5 estimation domains.
Element | Code | No. Samples | Mean Grade | Std Dev | Coeff Variation | |||||
Raw | Comp | Raw | Comp | % Diff | Raw | Comp | Raw | Comp | ||
Ta2O5
|
3103 | 215 | 202 | 155.2 | 156.0 | -0.50% | 143.6 | 146.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
3113 | 293 | 274 | 183.8 | 183.4 | 0.20% | 181.2 | 174.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | |
3203 | 71 | 70 | 121.8 | 123.5 | -1.40% | 85.8 | 85.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |
3213 | 34 | 30 | 130.7 | 134.3 | -2.70% | 80.2 | 83.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
3301 | 47 | 45 | 105.8 | 104.0 | 1.70% | 68.1 | 67.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
3302 | 732 | 409 | 144.9 | 142.9 | 1.40% | 131.1 | 130.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 | |
3303 | 446 | 426 | 155.1 | 156.5 | -0.90% | 111.2 | 112.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |
3311 | 98 | 94 | 107.4 | 109.1 | -1.60% | 89.5 | 90.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
3312 | 416 | 387 | 199.3 | 201.6 | -1.10% | 375.7 | 384.1 | 1.9 | 1.9 | |
3313 | 767 | 726 | 188.4 | 190.5 | -1.10% | 296.0 | 303.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 | |
3401 | 50 | 50 | 193.2 | 193.2 | 0.00% | 165.6 | 165.6 | 0.9 | 0.9 | |
3402 | 388 | 373 | 244.4 | 243.9 | 0.20% | 246.6 | 248.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
3403 | 6 | 6 | 328.1 | 328.1 | 0.00% | 252.6 | 252.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Element | Code | No. Samples | Mean Grade | Std Dev | Coeff Variation | |||||
Raw | Comp | Raw | Comp | % Diff | Raw | Comp | Raw | Comp | ||
3411 | 14 | 14 | 251.6 | 251.6 | 0.00% | 168.6 | 168.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |
3412 | 143 | 137 | 263.9 | 265.0 | -0.40% | 148.4 | 150.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
3502 | 132 | 123 | 176.1 | 178.9 | -1.60% | 169.0 | 173.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
3503 | 68 | 64 | 182.3 | 185.3 | -1.60% | 130.4 | 132.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |
3512 | 82 | 81 | 214.5 | 213.1 | 0.70% | 146.2 | 144.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |
3513 | 43 | 43 | 248.3 | 248.3 | 0.00% | 128.9 | 128.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
3603 | 15 | 14 | 167.9 | 173.2 | -3.10% | 68.4 | 67.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
3613 | 7 | 6 | 222.3 | 228.8 | -2.80% | 87.7 | 83.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
3703 | 103 | 100 | 169.4 | 168.1 | 0.80% | 89.6 | 90.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
3713 | 113 | 109 | 157.4 | 158.9 | -0.90% | 73.3 | 74.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
3803 | 24 | 23 | 160.4 | 164.1 | -2.30% | 80.4 | 80.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
3813 | 22 | 21 | 145.9 | 150.9 | -3.30% | 93.3 | 92.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
3903 | 14 | 14 | 148.9 | 148.9 | 0.00% | 93.6 | 93.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
3913 | 9 | 8 | 166.3 | 164.0 | 1.40% | 62.7 | 65.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
6103 | 938 | 843 | 131.9 | 131.3 | 0.50% | 92.0 | 94.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |
6113 | 1,439 | 1,314 | 113.7 | 116.0 | -2.00% | 214.6 | 222.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | |
6203 | 689 | 609 | 151.0 | 150.6 | 0.30% | 101.9 | 103.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |
6213 | 747 | 681 | 215.5 | 221.2 | -2.60% | 699.9 | 731.6 | 3.2 | 3.3 | |
6303 | 97 | 88 | 227.5 | 226.0 | 0.70% | 120.2 | 123.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
6313 | 146 | 138 | 205.3 | 203.9 | 0.70% | 72.6 | 73.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
6403 | 19 | 12 | 155.9 | 145.5 | 7.10% | 60.7 | 62.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
6413 | 8 | 7 | 122.1 | 109.4 | 11.60% | 59.9 | 36.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
Table 11-4 – Comparison statistics between raw and composite samples for the Fe2O3 estimation domains.
Element | Code | No. Samples | Mean Grade | Std Dev | Coeff Variation | |||||
Raw | Comp | Raw | Comp | % Diff | Raw | Comp | Raw | Comp | ||
Fe2O3
|
0 | 277,225 | 19,838 | 7.70 | 7.49 | 2.80% | 4.05 | 4.12 | 0.53 | 0.55 |
98 | 37 | 31 | 9.04 | 8.68 | 4.10% | 3.36 | 3.52 | 0.37 | 0.41 | |
3103 | 216 | 203 | 2.64 | 2.66 | -0.80% | 2.51 | 2.56 | 0.95 | 0.96 | |
3113 | 295 | 276 | 1.87 | 1.87 | 0.00% | 1.15 | 1.16 | 0.61 | 0.62 | |
3203 | 72 | 71 | 2.54 | 2.56 | -0.80% | 2.21 | 2.22 | 0.87 | 0.86 | |
3213 | 35 | 31 | 2.06 | 2.11 | -2.40% | 1.23 | 1.29 | 0.60 | 0.61 | |
3301 | 51 | 49 | 2.02 | 2.02 | 0.00% | 1.82 | 1.85 | 0.90 | 0.92 | |
3302 | 452 | 428 | 2.07 | 2.08 | -0.50% | 2.14 | 2.16 | 1.04 | 1.04 | |
3303 | 455 | 435 | 2.76 | 2.81 | -1.80% | 2.79 | 2.86 | 1.01 | 1.02 | |
3311 | 99 | 95 | 1.51 | 1.52 | -0.70% | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.50 | 0.51 | |
3312 | 419 | 389 | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00% | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.74 | 0.73 | |
3313 | 778 | 736 | 1.49 | 1.50 | -0.70% | 1.26 | 1.28 | 0.85 | 0.85 | |
3401 | 51 | 51 | 2.54 | 2.54 | 0.00% | 1.97 | 1.97 | 0.77 | 0.77 | |
3402 | 393 | 378 | 3.07 | 3.09 | -0.60% | 2.79 | 2.79 | 0.91 | 0.91 | |
3403 | 6 | 6 | 2.55 | 2.55 | 0.00% | 1.59 | 1.59 | 0.62 | 0.62 | |
3411 | 14 | 14 | 3.15 | 3.15 | 0.00% | 2.67 | 2.67 | 0.85 | 0.85 | |
3412 | 144 | 138 | 1.55 | 1.57 | -1.30% | 1.45 | 1.48 | 0.94 | 0.94 | |
3502 | 140 | 130 | 3.43 | 3.41 | 0.60% | 2.90 | 2.90 | 0.85 | 0.85 | |
3503 | 69 | 65 | 2.28 | 2.20 | 3.60% | 2.10 | 2.01 | 0.92 | 0.91 | |
3512 | 85 | 84 | 2.66 | 2.68 | -0.70% | 2.11 | 2.12 | 0.79 | 0.79 | |
3513 | 42 | 42 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 0.00% | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.56 | 0.56 | |
3603 | 16 | 15 | 4.33 | 3.97 | 9.10% | 3.32 | 3.12 | 0.77 | 0.79 | |
3613 | 7 | 6 | 2.80 | 2.56 | 9.40% | 1.11 | 1.02 | 0.40 | 0.40 | |
3703 | 104 | 101 | 2.46 | 2.51 | -2.00% | 2.65 | 2.67 | 1.08 | 1.07 | |
3713 | 199 | 115 | 1.76 | 1.75 | 0.60% | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.70 | 0.71 | |
3803 | 24 | 23 | 1.85 | 1.87 | -1.10% | 1.48 | 1.51 | 0.80 | 0.81 | |
3813 | 24 | 23 | 1.94 | 1.98 | -2.00% | 1.31 | 1.33 | 0.67 | 0.67 | |
3903 | 15 | 15 | 3.69 | 3.69 | 0.00% | 3.22 | 3.22 | 0.87 | 0.87 | |
3913 | 9 | 8 | 2.76 | 2.72 | 1.50% | 1.93 | 2.02 | 0.70 | 0.74 | |
6103 | 1,000 | 902 | 2.33 | 2.38 | -2.10% | 2.62 | 2.60 | 1.12 | 1.09 | |
6113 | 1,602 | 1,463 | 1.67 | 1.70 | -1.80% | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.73 | 0.73 | |
6203 | 696 | 615 | 2.37 | 2.37 | 0.00% | 2.02 | 1.90 | 0.85 | 0.80 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Element | Code | No. Samples | Mean Grade | Std Dev | Coeff Variation | |||||
Raw | Comp | Raw | Comp | % Diff | Raw | Comp | Raw | Comp | ||
6213 | 751 | 685 | 1.84 | 1.86 | -1.10% | 1.07 | 1.05 | 0.58 | 0.56 | |
6303 | 100 | 91 | 2.38 | 2.55 | -6.70% | 2.91 | 3.00 | 1.22 | 1.18 | |
6313 | 147 | 139 | 1.51 | 1.55 | -2.60% | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.53 | 0.52 | |
6403 | 23 | 16 | 3.35 | 4.39 | -23.70% | 4.22 | 4.68 | 1.26 | 1.07 | |
6413 | 9 | 8 | 1.79 | 1.82 | -1.60% | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.27 | 0.28 |
For all the domains, the compositing process has resulted in either no change or a minor decrease to the element grade and CV.
11.1.2.7 | Top Cutting |
Composites within the various estimation domains have been analyzed to ensure that the grade distributions are indicative of a single population, with no requirement for additional sub-domaining, and to identify any extreme values which could have an undue influence on the estimation of grade within these domains.
For Li2O domains that have a coefficient of variation (“CV”) greater than 1.8, log histograms, log probability and mean-variance plots have been used to assess the influence of extreme values and to determine the appropriate top cut where applicable. Where the top cut is applied, all grade values greater than the top cut grade was set to the top cut value (grade cap).
Top cut analysis indicated capping was only required for two Li2O estimation domains, and three Ta2O5 domains (Table 11-5).
Table 11-5 – Summary statistics for the Li2O estimation domains.
Element | Domain | Number of Samples | Mean Grade | Top-Cut Value | Standard Deviation | Coeff of Variation | |||||
Un-Cut | Top-Cut | Un-Cut | Top-Cut | % Diff | Un-Cut | Top-Cut | Un-Cut | Top-Cut | |||
Li2O | 34023403 | 374 | 1 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0% | 2.0 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 1.81 | 1.78 |
35023503 | 183 | 4 | 0.24 | 0.22 | -7% | 1.8 | 0.47 | 0.36 | 1.99 | 1.69 | |
Ta2O5 | 3312 | 385 | 1 | 201.20 | 195.70 | -3% | 3,800 | 385.00 | 310.20 | 1.91 | 1.59 |
6113 | 1,313 | 2 | 115.90 | 112.60 | -3% | 2,000 | 222.90 | 150.90 | 1.92 | 1.34 | |
6213 | 681 | 1 | 221.20 | 201.80 | -9% | 4,300 | 731.60 | 347.00 | 3.31 | 1.72 |
11.1.2.8 | Variography |
Variographic analysis has been undertaken using the top-cut composite data for the various estimation domains for Li2O, Fe2O3 and Ta2O5. The variogram study was integrated with mineralized domain models. The resulting variogram continuity directions have been checked against the pegmatite wireframes to ensure that they are geologically robust such that the orientation of strike, dip and plunge directions of the ellipsoid are compatible with known mineralization or structural orientations. Where variogram
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
rotations were found to not be compatible with the modelled pegmatite orientations, the rotations were adjusted to fit the appropriate variogram to the pegmatite.
11.1.3 | Block Model and Grade Estimation |
Mining Plus undertook the update of the NW and SW areas, using the same drillhole/block model coding logic and estimation methodology as that utilized in the April 2021 MRE. The NW and SW areas have been updated to include additional drillholes completed in the area since the April 2021 MRE update (Figure 11-3).
Figure 11-3 – Plan view of the NW and SW Areas and updated wireframes in the Jan 2023 MRE update.
11.1.3.1 | Block Model Construction |
The block model construction applied to Mineral Resource estimation has been completed within Datamine™ Studio RM software. A three-dimensional non-rotated block model was constructed to cover the limits of the deposit into which the estimate was completed. The block model extents and block sizes are also presented for the mineralization and non-mineralized areas.
The parameters used for the construction of the block model are summarized in Table 11-6.
Table 11-6 – Block model construction parameters.
Scheme | Block Model Origin | Block Model Maximum | Parent Block Size | Number of Cells | ||||||||
X | Y | Z | X | Y | Z | X | Y | Z | X | Y | Z | |
Parent | 223,600 | 6,281,800 | -125 | 224,700 | 6,283,200 | 300 | 20 | 20 | 5 | 55 | 70 | 85 |
Subblock | 223,600 | 6,281,800 | -125 | 224,700 | 6,283,200 |
300 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.625 |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
The parent block sizes selected are approximately half the dominant drillhole spacing within the NW and SW area and are sub-celled to account for the variable thicknesses of the pegmatites.
Sub-celling has been used to accurately represent the wireframe volumes. Parent block estimation has been undertaken and therefore, all sub-cells within a single parent block have the same estimated grade as the parent cell.
The block model is coded with mineralized domain attributes that correspond with a geological and mineralization domain as defined by the wireframe solids.
11.1.3.2 | Grade Estimation |
The variogram models were used for the Li2O, Ta2O5, and Fe2O3 estimations using ordinary kriging estimation methods into both the mineralized and un-mineralized pegmatite domains.
The grade estimations have generally been completed in three passes, although some of the more sparsely drilled domains have required a fourth interpolation run to estimate a grade.
The search ellipse ranges applied have been based on the grade continuity within each domain or grouped domain.
Fe2O3 has been estimated in the pegmatites, external waste, and dolerite domains. Li2O and Ta2O5 have only been estimated in the pegmatites. The estimation parameters are summarized in Table 11-7.
Table 11-7 – NW and SW Area estimation parameters.
Estimation Pass | Distance | # Samples | Drillhole Limit |
First Pass | Approximates half of the variogram range | 7 – 27 | 4 |
Second Pass | Approximates the variogram range | 7 – 27 | 4 |
Third Pass | 4 x the approximate variogram range | 2 – 24 | - |
Due to the variable dips of the pegmatites, the dynamic anisotropy method was utilized in the block model estimation. The dynamic anisotropy process allows the orientation for the search ellipsoid to be defined individually for each cell in the model so that the search ellipsoid is aligned with the orientation of the mineralization in an attempt to ensure optimum search of composite data for the estimation.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
11.1.3.3 | Bulk Density |
A bulk density data review has been undertaken by Mining Plus during the estimation of the entire Mt Cattlin MRE in November and December 2018 (Mining Plus, 2018).
No additional bulk density data have been collected in the NW and SW areas since the review was completed in 2018, therefore the bulk density values determined in 2018 have been applied to the NW and SW area for this MRE update (Table 11-8).
Material within the waste dumps, haul roads and bunds above the topographic surface has been assigned a bulk density of 1.8 g/cm3 within the block model.
Table 11-8 – Summary of bulk density data by geology and weathering domain.
Lithology Group | Weathering | Bulk Density Assigned (g/cm3) |
Waste Lithologies | Oxide | 2.50 |
Transitional | 2.70 | |
Fresh | 2.86 | |
Unmineralized Pegmatite | Oxide | 2.42 |
Transitional | 2.62 | |
Fresh | 2.78 | |
Mineralized Pegmatite | Oxide | 2.47 |
Transitional | 2.71 | |
Fresh | 2.72 |
11.1.4 | Block Model Validation |
Validation checks have been undertaken at all stages of the modelling and estimation process. The final grade estimates of all three elements have been validated using:
● | A visual comparison of block grade estimates and the input drillhole data, |
● | A global comparison of the average composite and estimated block grades, |
● | Moving window averages comparing the mean block grades to the composites. |
11.1.4.1 | Visual Validation |
Visual comparison of composite sample grade and block grade has been conducted in cross-section and in plan view. In general, there is a reasonable consistency between high/low-grade blocks and drillholes. The block grades show no gross grade smearing (Figure 11-4).
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Figure 11-4 – Cross section looking North at 224,202 E, through Pegmatite 61 and 62.
11.1.4.2 | Global Comparisons |
The global block estimated mean grade was checked against de-clustered composite data. The estimates show an acceptable reproduction of the mean, reasonable to support Mineral Resource classification applied.
A comparison of the estimated grades compared to the input grades within each pegmatite are provided in Table 11-9 to Table 11-10.
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Table 11-9 – NW and SW Area block model Li2O global validation statistics, by estimation domain.
Element | Pegmatite | Code1 | Estimated Tonnes | Estimated Grade (cut) | No. Composites | Composite Grade (cut) | Tonnes per composite | % Diff Est vs Comp |
Comments |
Li2O | 31 | 310 | 2,570,082 | 0.37 | 252 | 0.39 | 10,199 | -4.30% | |
31 | 311 | 1,916,306 | 1.16 | 276 | 1.22 | 6,943 | -4.50% | ||
32 | 320 | 825,067 | 0.27 | 71 | 0.33 | 11,621 | -19.30% | Low sample support. | |
32 | 321 | 353,709 | 1.11 | 31 | 1.06 | 11,410 | 5.50% | ||
33 | 330 | 1,142,341 | 0.25 | 863 | 0.27 | 1,324 | -8.60% | ||
33 | 331 | 718,912 | 1.09 | 1,220 | 1.13 | 589 | -4.20% | ||
34 | 340 | 349,951 | 0.20 | 435 | 0.23 | 804 | -15.20% | Non-mineralized pegmatite. Rescat 0. | |
34 | 341 | 76,612 | 1.09 | 152 | 1.13 | 504 | -3.60% | ||
35 | 350 | 304,206 | 0.16 | 195 | 0.18 | 1,560 | -9.60% | ||
35 | 351 | 137,609 | 0.81 | 126 | 0.82 | 1,092 | -1.80% | ||
36 | 360 | 28,028 | 0.33 | 15 | 0.30 | 1,869 | 11.30% | Low sample support. Non-mineralized. Rescat 0. | |
36 | 361 | 6,086 | 0.70 | 6 | 0.75 | 1,014 | -6.40% | ||
37 | 370 | 66,513 | 0.56 | 101 | 0.62 | 659 | -9.30% | ||
37 | 371 | 56,297 | 1.29 | 115 | 1.26 | 490 | 1.70% | ||
38 | 380 | 798,389 | 0.33 | 23 | 0.35 | 34,713 | -4.60% | ||
38 | 381 | 258,128 | 1.77 | 23 | 1.76 | 11,223 | 0.60% | ||
39 | 390 | 783,633 | 0.16 | 15 | 0.17 | 52,242 | -7.50% | ||
39 | 391 | 218,511 | 1.20 | 8 | 1.01 | 27,314 | 18.30% | Low sample support. Rescat 3. | |
61 | 610 | 3,393,765 | 0.38 | 902 | 0.36 | 3,762 | 7.10% | ||
61 | 611 | 4,293,816 | 1.40 | 1463 | 1.38 | 2,935 | 1.10% | ||
62 | 620 | 4,400,746 | 0.54 | 615 | 0.51 | 7,156 | 6.10% | ||
62 | 621 | 3,949,229 | 1.51 | 685 | 1.54 | 5,765 | -1.60% | ||
63 | 630 | 169,706 | 0.66 | 91 | 0.72 | 1,865 | -8.80% | ||
63 | 631 | 150,411 | 1.42 | 139 | 1.49 | 1,082 | -4.80% | ||
64 | 640 | 82,929 | 0.23 | 16 | 0.31 | 5,183 | -26.60% | ||
64 | 641 | 30,658 | 1.77 | 8 | 1.82 | 4,029 | -2.80% |
Table 11-10 – NW and SW Area block model Ta2O5 global validation statistics, by estimation domain.
Element | Pegmatite | Code1 | Estimated Tonnes | Estimated Grade (cut) | No. Composites | Composite Grade (cut) | Tonnes per composite | % Diff Est vs Comp |
Comments |
Ta2O5
|
31 | 311 | 2,570,082 | 155 | 247 | 152 | 10,405 | 1.60% | |
31 | 310 | 1,916,306 | 182 | 274 | 185 | 6,994 | -1.70% | ||
32 | 321 | 825,067 | 122 | 70 | 128 | 11,787 | -4.60% | ||
32 | 320 | 353,709 | 135 | 30 | 137 | 11,790 | -1.50% | ||
33 | 331 | 1,142,341 | 151 | 835 | 151 | 1,368 | 0.00% | ||
33 | 330 | 718,912 | 176 | 1207 | 178 | 596 | -0.90% |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Element | Pegmatite | Code1 | Estimated Tonnes | Estimated Grade (cut) | No. Composites | Composite Grade (cut) | Tonnes per composite | % Diff Est vs Comp |
Comments |
34 | 340 | 349,951 | 242 | 429 | 248 | 816 | -2.40% | ||
34 | 341 | 76,612 | 284 | 151 | 276 | 507 | 3.10% | ||
35 | 350 | 304,206 | 220 | 187 | 211 | 1,627 | 4.40% | ||
35 | 351 | 137,609 | 282 | 124 | 251 | 1,110 | 12.20% | Low sample support. | |
36 | 361 | 28,028 | 173 | 14 | 168 | 2,002 | 3.20% | ||
36 | 360 | 6,086 | 222 | 6 | 214 | 1,014 | 3.90% | ||
37 | 371 | 66,513 | 171 | 100 | 168 | 665 | 1.80% | ||
37 | 370 | 56,297 | 147 | 109 | 158 | 516 | -7.00% | ||
38 | 380 | 798,389 | 167 | 23 | 165 | 34,713 | 1.20% | ||
38 | 381 | 258,128 | 147 | 21 | 151 | 12,292 | -2.60% | ||
39 | 390 | 783,633 | 147 | 14 | 142 | 55,974 | 3.10% | ||
39 | 391 | 218,511 | 161 | 8 | 141 | 27,314 | 14.30% | Low sample support. | |
61 | 611 | 3,393,765 | 131 | 843 | 131 | 4,026 | 0.60% | ||
61 | 610 | 4,293,816 | 110 | 1314 | 111 | 3,268 | -1.10% | ||
62 | 621 | 4,400,746 | 152 | 609 | 150 | 7,226 | 1.20% | ||
62 | 620 | 3,949,229 | 220 | 681 | 200 | 5,799 | 10.20% | Non-mineralized pegmatite. Rescat 0. | |
63 | 631 | 169,706 | 234 | 88 | 221 | 1,928 | 6.10% | ||
63 | 630 | 150,411 | 203 | 138 | 205 | 1,090 | -1.10% | ||
64 | 640 | 82,929 | 139 | 12 | 141 | 6,911 | -1.00% | ||
64 | 641 | 30,658 | 113 | 7 | 101 | 4,605 | 12.50% | Low sample support. |
Table 11-11 – NW and SW Area block model Fe2O3 global validation statistics, by estimation domain.
Element | Pegmatite | Code1 | Estimated Tonnes | Estimated Grade (cut) | No. Composites | Composite Grade (cut) | Tonnes per composite | % Diff Est vs Comp |
Comments |
Fe2O3
|
0 | 0 | 1,031,998,450 | 7.84 | 25782 | 7.75 | 40,028 | 1.20% | |
98 | 98 | 16,240,271 | 6.66 | 35 | 8.86 | 464,008 | -24.80% | ||
310 | 310 | 2,570,082 | 2.64 | 252 | 2.54 | 10,199 | 3.70% | ||
311 | 311 | 1,916,306 | 1.93 | 276 | 1.87 | 6,943 | 3.50% | ||
320 | 320 | 825,067 | 2.54 | 71 | 2.56 | 11,621 | -0.90% | ||
321 | 321 | 353,709 | 1.83 | 31 | 2.11 | 11,410 | -13.50% | ||
330 | 330 | 1,142,341 | 2.75 | 863 | 2.45 | 1,324 | 12.40% | ||
331 | 331 | 718,912 | 1.60 | 1220 | 1.46 | 589 | 9.80% | ||
340 | 340 | 349,951 | 3.08 | 435 | 3.02 | 804 | 1.90% | ||
341 | 341 | 76,612 | 1.80 | 152 | 1.72 | 504 | 4.60% | ||
350 | 350 | 304,206 | 3.29 | 195 | 3.01 | 1,560 | 9.40% | ||
351 | 351 | 137,609 | 2.27 | 126 | 2.29 | 1,092 | -1.10% | ||
360 | 360 | 28,028 | 3.71 | 15 | 3.97 | 1,869 | -6.50% | ||
361 | 361 | 6,086 | 2.07 | 6 | 2.56 | 1,014 | -19.10% |
SEC Technical Report Summary
Mt. Cattlin Lithium Project
Element | Pegmatite | Code1 | Estimated Tonnes | Estimated Grade (cut) | No. Composites | Composite Grade (cut) | Tonnes per composite | % Diff Est vs Comp |
Comments |
370 | 370 | 66,513 | 2.30 | 101 | 2.51 | 659 | -8.30% | ||
371 | 371 | 56,297 | 1.74 | 115 | 1.75 | 490 | -0.80% | ||
380 | 380 | 798,389 | 1.81 | 23 | 1.87 | 34,713 | -3.20% | ||
381 | 381 | 258,128 | 1.88 | 23 | 1.98 | 11,223 | -5.00% | ||
390 | 390 | 783,633 | 3.37 | 15 | 3.69 | 52,242 | -8.50% | ||
391 | 391 | 218,511 | 1.54 | 8 | 2.72 | 27,314 | -43.50% | ||
610 | 610 | 3,393,765 | 2.52 | 902 | 2.38 | 3,762 | 5.90% | ||
611 | 611 | 4,293,816 | 1.74 | 1463 | 1.70 | 2,935 | 2.10% | ||
620 | 620 | 4,400,746 | 2.41 | 615 | 2.37 | 7,156 | 1.60% | ||
621 | 621 | 3,949,229 | 1.95 | 685 | 1.86 | 5,765 | 4.70% | ||
630 | 630 | 169,706 | 2.53 | 91 | 2.55 | 1,865 | -0.70% | ||
631 | 631 | 150,411 | 1.62 | 139 | 1.55 | 1,138 | 4.40% | ||
640 | 640 | 82,929 | 3.91 | 16 | 4.39 | 5,184 | -11.00% | ||
641 | 641 | 30,658 | 1.68 | 8 | 1.82 | 4,029 | -7.70% |
11.1.4.3 | Swath Plots |
Sectional validation graphs have been created to assess the reproduction of local means and to validate the grade trends in the block model by Easting, Northing and Elevation.
The swath plots show satisfactory correlation between the estimated and actual drillhole grades and indicate the absence of significant global bias.
11.1.4.4 | Un-estimated Blocks |
Un-estimated blocks have been assigned grades as outlined in Table 11-12. Un-estimated blocks are typically located at the furthest extents of each of the domains.
Table 11-12 – Grades assigned to un-estimated blocks, by element and domain.
Element | Domain | Grade Assigned |
Li2O | Waste Domains | 0% |
Pegmatites | 0.01% | |
Ta2O5 | Waste Domains | 0 ppm |
Pegmatites | 0.01 ppm | |
Fe2O3 | Waste Domains | 0.01% |
Pegmatites | 0.01% |
11.2 | Mineral Resource Classification |
The Mineral Resource has been classified as Measured, Indicated, and Inferred primarily based on the drilling data spacing, grade and geological continuity, and quality of the estimation as indicated by the geostatistical slope of regression (Table 11-13).
Table 11-13 – Resource classification criteria.
The Mineral Resource has been classified on the following basis:
● | Areas of the in-situ Mineral Resource that have been defined by grade control drilling on a 20 m by 20 m pattern and have a high level of confidence in the estimation quality have |
been classified as Measured Mineral Resources. The mined areas of each pegmatite have also been classified as Measured Resources.
● | Pegmatites which have been defined by drillholes spaced less than 40 m by 40 m, estimated on the first two passes, up to the range of the variograms, and have returned a slope of regression value above 0.5 have been classified as Indicated Mineral Resources. To avoid the generation of a ‘spotted dog’ classification, each pegmatite domain has been individually assessed and wireframes have been created to black flag the block model and classify the Indicated blocks. |
● | The blocks that have been populated with a grade on either the first, second or third pass and have been defined by drillholes spaced greater than 40 m by 40 m with lower levels of confidence in the quality of the estimate and hence in the continuity of the grade have been classified as Inferred Mineral Resources. |
● | Blocks that have not been estimated within three passes or have an assigned grade have remained unclassified. |
11.3 | Depletion |
The Mineral Resource has been depleted using the surveyed as built surface as of 30 June 2023, which has been coded into the model. Previously coded tailings and rockfill from below the depletion surface remain within the updated model, Figure 11-5.
Model displayed as “mined” with depletion surface (black) and natural topography (orange) displayed.
Figure 11-5 – Cross-Section 6282329N.
11.4 | Basis for Establishing the Reasonable Prospects of Eventual Economic Extraction for Mineral Resources |
As part of the evaluation for a Mineral Resource, and in line with NI-43101reporting standards, Reasonable Prospects of Eventual Economic Extraction (“RPEEE”) was also completed. The RPEEE analysis was completed using Whittle optimizations to determine an optimized resource pit shell determined by applying the following parameters in Table 11-14:
Table 11-14 – Optimization Parameters used.
Parameter | Value |
Mining Recovery | 93% |
Mining Dilution | 17% |
Li2O % Price/tonne 6% concentrate | US$1,500 |
Li2O % recovery | 75% |
Ta2O5ppm Price/pound concentrate | US$40 |
Ta2O5ppm recovery | 25% |
Transport and port Cost/tonne | US$34.76 |
State Royalty | 5% |
Processing Cost/tonne | US$23.21 |
Mining Cost/tonne | US$3.00 |
US$ exchange rate | 0.7 |
11.4.1 | Cut-off Grade |
A cut-off grade of 0.3% Li2O has been applied to the fresh material in the Whittle optimization. The optimization captures fresh material only, therefore there has been no cut-off grade applied to material from other weathering domains.
The cut-off grade applied to the Mineral Resources is higher than the economic cut-off grade. An economic cut-off calculation and inputs is shown Section 12.3.2.
11.5 | Mineral Resources Statement |
Surface stockpiles surveyed as of 30 June 2023 have been included in the Mineral Resource and have been classified based on the level of confidence in the grade and tonnage assigned to surface stocks Table 11-15.
The Mineral Resource is reported below, both within the US$1,500 RPEEE pit shell at a cut-off of 0.3% Li2O as of 30 June 2023, and also globally without the shell, and in this case both inclusive and exclusive of reserves.
Table 11-15 – Mt Cattlin Mineral Resource as of 30 June 2023, COG >=0.3% Li2O.
Class | Tonnage | Li2O |
Ta2O5 | Fe2O3 | Li2O |
LCE |
Mt | % |
ppm |
% |
tonnes |
tonnes |
|
Global Insitu Resource as of 30 June 2023, Cut -off grade Lithia 0.3% | ||||||
Measured | 0.2 | 1.00% | 172 | 2.00% | 2,000 | 5,000 |
Indicated | 8.8 | 1.40% | 165 | 2.00% | 121,000 | 300,000 |
Stockpiles | 1.8 | 0.80% | 95 | 2.10% | 13,000 | 32,000 |
Inferred | 1.3 | 1.30% | 181 | 2.10% | 17,000 | 42,000 |
Total | 12.1 | 1.30% | 167 | 2.00% | 153,000 | 379,000 |
Insitu Mineral Resource as of 30 June 2023, Cut -off grade Lithia 0.3%, US$ 1,500 Shell | ||||||
Measured | 0.2 | 1.00% | 171 | 2.00% | 2,000 | 5,000 |
Indicated | 7.2 | 1.40% | 147 | 2.00% | 98,000 | 242,000 |
Inferred | 0.2 | 1.10% | 133 | 2.10% | 2,000 | 5,000 |
Stockpiles | 1.8 | 0.80% | 95 | 2.10% | 13,000 | 32,000 |
Total | 9.4 | 1.20% | 137 | 2.10% | 115,000 | 284000 |
11.6 | Mineral Resource Uncertainty Discussion |
Allkem is not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, or political factors that could materially influence the Mineral Resources other than the modifying factors already described in other Chapters of this report.
11.7 | Factors that are Likely to Influence the Reasonable Prospect of Eventual Economic Extraction |
Mt Cattlin is an operating mine and the 2NW open pit is the fifth and final open pit to be developed. Options for underground extraction are under study. The most likely factors to influence RPEEE are input concentrate price assumption and foreign exchange conversion to US$. Further permitting by the WA State Government is required to progress the2NW open pit development beyond Stage 3 to stages 4 -1 and 4-2.
12. Mineral Reserves Estimates
The assessment of the Mineral Reserves is based on consideration of:
● | An update of the Mineral Resource Estimate described in Chapter 11, |
● | The modifying parameters, pit designs and stockpile inventories described herein, |
● | The life of mine plan and financial modelling relating to the production plan described herein and in Section 18 and 19. The Mineral Reserves have been estimated as of 30 June 2023 and are a subset of the Mineral Resource Estimate of the same date. |
12.1 | Summary and Mineral Reserve |
Mt Cattlin is an existing open cut operation using crushing, ore sorting, and heavy media separation to beneficiate mined ore into saleable products. The operation began in 2010 before low prices forced a three-year hiatus between 2013 and 2016. The site has operated continuously and expanded in capacity since restarting in 2016.
Pit optimizations have been carried out using a fixed spodumene concentrate sale price of US$1,500/t and an exchange rate of 0.7 AUD:USD. Whittle pit optimization software has been used to identify the preferred pit shell on which the pit design was based.
The target design shells were selected to provide a logically phased mine life that maintains future optionality to further evaluate the trade-off between the larger second phase cutback compared to, or in conjunction with, underground mining.
The current mine sequence is based on:
● | Continuing to mine the current Stage 3 NW pit to provide near-term ore supply. |
● | Phasing of Stage 4 into two separate cutbacks to manage the strip ratio and provide smoother ore supply to the processing plant. |
● | Estimated permitting approval timelines for both cutbacks. |
All material was subjected to an economic evaluation in a financial model (with pricing supplied by Allkem). The mine plan is shown to be technically and financially feasible. A suitable cashflow positive buffer exists below the assumed product prices to provide confidence that the Mineral Reserve estimate will be financially viable within a reasonably expected range of possible product prices.
A variety of surface stockpiles exist on site from current and past works which have been financially evaluated and shown to be economically viable. The stockpiles include current stocks such as Run of Mine (ROM) pad ore and semi-processed crushed ore, as well as lower grade, lower return stockpiles that are scheduled for processing just prior to closure.
A Mineral Reserve estimate (MRE) has been reported and tabulated below (Table 12-1).
Table 12-1 – 2023 Mineral Reserve Update (Allkem, 2023).
Category | Location | Tonnage | Grade | Grade | Cont. Metal | Cont. Metal |
Mt | % Li2O | ppm Ta2O5 | (‘000) t Li2O | (‘000) lb. Ta2O5 | ||
Proven | In-situ | 0.2 | 0.9 | 120 | 1.4 | 45 |
Probable | In-situ | 5.2 | 1.3 | 130 | 69 | 1,500 |
Stockpiles | 1.8 | 0.8 | 95 | 13 | 390 | |
Total Mineral Reserves | 7.1 | 1.2 | 120 | 84 | 1,900 |
1) Mineral resources are reported considering a set
of assumptions for reporting purposes: |
||||||||||
• A cut-off grade of 0.3% Li2O was utilized for a spodumene concentrate (6.0% Li2O) price of US$1,500 per metric ton, tantalum concentrate price of US$20 per pound and an A$/US$ exchange rate of 1.43 over the entirety of the LOM. | ||||||||||
• Processing costs of US$23.19/t of ore. |
||||||||||
• Mining costs of US$3.00/t of ore. |
||||||||||
• Transport costs of US$34.74/t of spodumene concentrate. |
||||||||||
• State royalty of 5%. |
||||||||||
• Li2O% metallurgical
recovery of 75%. |
||||||||||
• Ta2O5 ppm metallurgical recovery of 25%. |
||||||||||
• Inherent mining dilution and recovery of 17% and 93%, respectively. |
||||||||||
2) Estimates have been rounded to a maximum of two
significant figures. |
||||||||||
3) Totals may appear different from the sum of their components due to rounding. | ||||||||||
This MRE shows the total Mineral Reserves have increased despite the mining depletion and the increase in operating costs that has occurred since the previous estimate record date.
Mineral Resource conversion from Inferred to Indicated classification, and the improved economic environment around Lithium supply have been the major contributors to the increase in Mineral Reserves.
The studies presented in this report are based on an updated Mineral Resource estimation for the Mt Cattlin deposit, which incorporates additional geological, drilling, and reconciliation data to revise the geological interpretation and update the Mineral Resource estimate. Additionally, depletion for mining as of 30 June 2023, is also incorporated in the updated Mineral Resource estimate upon which this work is based (refer to Item 14).
This MRE is depleted for mining as of 30 June 2023, and incorporates updated cost inputs, product pricing and other study assumptions to reflect the current project operating status.
12.2 | Geology and Mineral Resources |
The regional, local, and site geology and Mineral Resources are discussed in Chapter 11. For mine planning purposes, a diluted, regularized block model was created from the MRE and provided to Mining Plus by Allkem, which is described in more detail in Section 12.4.
Pit optimization of the Mt Cattlin deposit was undertaken using the following workflow:
1) | Model Net Value Calculation; followed by |
2) | Pseudoflow pit optimization; and |
3) | Shell scheduling for discounted cash flow. |
The Model Net Value calculation was performed using GEOVIA Surpac software, consistent with the native format of the supplied Mining Model. Pit optimization and shell scheduling were undertaken with GEOVIA Whittle software.
12.3 | Evaluation Factors |
12.3.1 | Evaluation Models |
The resource models used in for the evaluation were provided by Allkem in Surpac format before conversions as follows:
● | Conversion of the Mining Plus Datamine model: |
o | “mtc_jan23_nwsw_engmod_v3_alisami_230308.mdl,” (March 2023) |
● | Regularized, diluted Mining Model: |
o | “mt_cattlin_jan2023_v3_diluted.mdl,” (May 2023) |
12.3.2 | Cut-Off Grades |
The Ore Reserve estimate is reported at 0.3% given that this is a practical lower limit of processing recovery and geological interpretation, 0.3% is also used for reporting of Mineral Resources.
The economic assessment and cutoff grade calculation resulted in a lower potential economic cut-off grade, however the higher 0.3% Li2O has been maintained.
The economic test of the cut-off grade is shown below, prices as low as US$1,500/t concentrate (FOB equivalent) were chosen as these were lower than forecast information and a range of prices were tested, which were generally lower than the Allkem provided prices for the Economic Analysis.
Key prices considered were US$1,500/t and US$2,271/t (being the average price used in the
economic assessment). These prices and unit operating costs over the remaining LOM of 5 to 6 years were used for cut-off grade estimation.
A recovery of 60% was applied to reflect a conservative average expected from the mineral inventory above 0.3%.
Cut-off Grades were calculated for Marginal and Full Process costs (including G+A) in the test. The theoretical economic cut-offs ranged up to 0.2% Li2O (0.24% Li2O at 3 significant figures) at US$1,500/t shown in Table 12-2.
Table 12-2 – Theoretical Economic Cut-Off Grade Calculation.
Parameter | Units | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Comments |
Revenue 5.4% Con (FOB) US$/t | US$/t | 1,500 | 2,000 | 2,500 | 3,000 | 4,000 | US$ FOB |
Revenue US$/t lithia in Con | US$/t | 27,778 | 37,037 | 46,296 | 55,556 | 74,074 | 5.4% concentrate grade assumed. |
Port and Road Transport | US$/t Lithia | 734 |
734 |
734 |
734 |
734 |
5.4% concentrate grade, US$25.6/t concentrate trucking and US$14.1/t port |
Revenue US$/% Li2O | US$/% | 270 | 363 | 456 |
548 |
733 |
|
Met Recovery % | % | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | variable |
State Royalty % | % | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | WA State |
Net Revenue US$/% Li2O | US$/% |
154 | 207 | 260 | 312 | 418 | |
Variable Process Cost US$/t | US$/t |
14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | |
Royalty US$/t | US$/t | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Lithium Royalty Corp. |
F+V Process Cost US$/t | US$/t | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | |
Marginal COG % Li2O | % | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | NB Basement COG 0.3% in line with MRE |
F+V Processing COG % Li2O | % | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | NB Basement COG 0.3% in line with MRE |
12.3.3 | Depletion |
The Mining Model used for reporting of this MRE has been depleted to the site supplied topography as of 30 June 2023.
12.3.4 | Revenue Factors |
A Realized Price of US$1,500/dmt Li2O spodumene concentrate was used for the optimization, inclusive of discounts and penalties, making the pricing used effectively a net A$ FOB rate. The US$1,500/dmt Li2O is considered a conservative view of the forward pricing given the sale prices achieved in the open market (and market price linked contracts) over the past year, and the continuing strong price forecasts. The optimization price assumption conservatism also provides protection against high market volatility seen recently and is forecast to continue.
Tantalite concentrate is a by-product that contributes meaningful, but not material, revenue to the Project. A flat sale price based on existing contracts has been applied to expected production.
A flat forward exchange rate forecast of 0.7 AUD:USD was provided by Allkem for use in this analysis, and an annual discounting rate of 10% was used for Net Present Value calculations.
Table 12-3 – Product pricing.
Period | Realized Li2O | Exchange rate | Realized Li2O |
Realized Ta2O5 |
US$/dmt | AUD:USD | A$/dmt | A$/dry lb. | |
Average | 1,500 | 0.7 | 2,143 | 34.72 |
12.3.5 | Mining Factors |
The Net Value modelling and optimization process uses modifying factors and processing inputs determined from analysis of actual operating performance at the Mt Cattlin site, a competitive mining cost tendering process, and an FS level geotechnical study. No external mining recovery or mining dilution factors are applied as the designs are evaluated by a regularized, diluted mining model that has dilution and metal loss consistent with historical values incorporated into the re-blocked models.
12.3.6 | Geotechnical Factors |
Overall slope angles were estimated based on the geotechnical design parameters provided to Mining Plus. Allowance in the optimizing slope angles was made for the positioning of the ramp.
As part of the Feasibility Study (FS) a geotechnical assessment for the NW Stage expansion (“Mt Cattlin” and “the Project”). The geotechnical assessment evaluates the potential for slope instabilities and derives slope design parameter recommendations for the proposed open pit mining of the NW Stage 4 pit at Mt Cattlin.
Detailed discussion on Geotechnical Analysis is found in Chapter 13.4 Mine Design.
12.3.7 | Mining Dilution and Ore Loss |
A dilution study was completed to determine the appropriate methodology to create a Mining Model that incorporated dilution and ore loss and could be readily used in General Mine Planning (GMP) software. This study was provided to Mining Plus by Allkem and has been relied upon for evaluation and reporting of the block model and verifying the Ore Reserves as completed within the S-K 1300 Statement.
The key steps and outcomes from the dilution study and modifications to create the Mining Model were:
● | Regularizing the block size into Selective Mining Unit (SMU) dimensions of 5.0 m x 5.0 m x 2.5 m (East, North, Elevation) (the smallest sub-blocks within the original model were 0.5 m x 0.5 m x 0.625 m), as shown in below Figure 12-1. |
Figure 12-1 – SMU Re-Blocking Process.
● | The SMU size was selected based on the size of the equipment, the parent and sub cell block sizes in the resource model, and as it matched the existing mining bench height to the vertical dimensions of the block. |
● | The regularization results in a single SMU diluted block containing a single diluted value that honors the average grade of the constituent smaller ore and waste blocks. |
● | The incorporation of waste grades with lower grade blocks can result in the new SMU block having an average grade now below the cut-off value, and thus not reporting to the model inventory, resulting in an overall metal loss. |
● | The number of blocks within the regularized model was decreased dramatically from ~150 M blocks to ~37 M blocks which improved the efficiency of mine planning activities. |
● | The ore blocks were flagged as either “Clean” (minimal contamination with mining dilution) or “Contaminated” (significant mining contamination with basalt country rock and requiring beneficiation by optical sorting prior to being processed) ore types depending upon the proportion of clean ore within the SMU block. Historical mining reconciliation data showed 17% of ore mined was classified as Contaminated, so the Clean / Contaminated flag was manipulated to mimic that result. It was found that if at least 55% of the SMU block contained clean ore, then the entire block was flagged as clean, otherwise the block was flagged as contaminated ore type. Figure 12-2 shows a typical east-west section through the Mount Cattlin deposit with the orebody colored by Clean (blue) or Contaminated (colloquially known as Dirty) (red) ore types. |
Figure 12-2 – Clean and Contaminated Ore Blocks After Re-Blocking.
● | The overall model reports 82% of the ore to the clean category and 18% to the Contaminated category |
● | The overall model has a back calculated metal loss factor of 5.7% and a dilution factor of 16%. |
12.3.8 | Cost Factors |
12.3.8.1 | Contract Mining Costs |
Mining is conducted using backhoe configuration hydraulic excavators and medium sized rigid trucks (Caterpillar 785, 777, and equivalent), supported by a typical ancillary fleet. This fleet is considered appropriate for the geometry of the deposits at Mt Cattlin, providing both flexibility and cost efficiency. The fleet is owned and operated by mining contractors with employees drawn from local residential and Fly In – Fly Out (FIFO) commute sources.
Mining costs are calculated on rates supplied in a competitive market tender which were estimated based on a scheduled mine plan. The rates are incremented for weathering type, material type, and the haul profile (e.g., excavating bench depth and dumping location). Comparison to the recent actual mining costs confirms these rates are appropriate. Table 12-4 summarizes the contractor mining input rates used.
Table 12-4 – Contractor Mining Costs.
Parameter | Unit | Material Type | Rate (from) | Rate (to) |
Drill and Blast | US$/BCM | Ore | $2.28 | $2.72 |
Waste | $2.28 | $2.72 | ||
Load and Haul | US$/BCM | Ore | $7.80 | $8.66 |
Waste | $7.08 | $8.49 |
12.3.8.2 | Owners’ Costs |
The non-contractor mining costs such as Mt Cattlin’s technical services and management, compliance, dewatering, and grade control are wrapped into the site-wide General and Administration (G&A) costs which are shown in Table 12-5.
Site G&A costs, whilst largely fixed in character, are conveniently expressed as a unit rate denominated by processed tonnes and grouped with other similarly denominated costs. G&A captures all Mt Catlin’s non-mining contractor costs required to operate the site, and includes general management, departmental management, employee costs (excluding processing staff), accommodation and commuting, compliance, safety, environmental, community relations, power generation.
A third-party royalty is payable on a “per dry metric tonne processed” basis. This means this royalty is better represented as a ‘processing’ cost rather than a ‘selling’ or post-processing cost.
These processing denominated costs are applied only to blocks that are selected for processing in the optimization process.
Table 12-5 – Processing Costs.
Parameter | Unit | Rate |
Processing | US$/t | 29.12 |
General and Administration | US$/t | 6.79 |
Third Party Royalty | US$/t | 1.05 |
After processing of ore, additional costs are incurred upon the sale of the product. These costs include the transport of product to port, port costs including ship loading, sea freight and business administration (Sea Freight is included in the net concentrate prices used for the analysis). Western Australian State royalties are applied on the total revenue available from the product (in the form it is first sold), less reasonable transport costs to get the product to the point of sale. These costs are summarized in Table 12-6.
Table 12-6 – Post Processing Costs.
Parameter | Unit | Rate |
Surface Haulage | US$/t | 25.57 |
Port Costs | US$/t | 14.06 |
State Royalty | % | 5 |
12.3.9 | Metallurgical Factors |
Table 12-7Table 12-7 summarizes the processing rates and recoveries applied to the optimization, and further detail on metallurgical recovery forecasts can be found in Chapter 10:
Table 12-7 – Process Rates and Recoveries.
Parameter | Unit | Rate |
Mining Dilution | % | Incl. in Mining Model |
Mining Recovery | % | Incl. in Mining Model |
Processing plant capacity | tpa | 1.8 M |
Spodumene concentrate recovery | % | By regression formula based on 5.4% concentrate grade. |
Tantalite concentrate recovery | % | 20 |
Ore processing is carried out through a crushing, ore sorting, screening, and heavy media separation (HMS) plant with a nominal capacity of 1.8 Mt per annum, although the processing rate may be reduced at sustained high feed grades (>1.3% Li2O) to avoid overloading the wet plant and reducing plant recovery.
Plant recovery is calculated from regression formulas that have been developed on site from historical performance data, with examples for 5.2% Li2O and 5.4% Li2O concentrate grades shown in Figure 12-3. The regression formula inputs are plant head grade and target concentrate product grade, with unique curves (and data tables) generated for a specific concentrate grade.
Figure 12-3 – Product Grade - Recovery Curve (SC5.2 and SC5.4).
The Whittle optimizing software calculates a metal recovery, and then the yield (final tonnage) of the product on a block-by-block basis, which then allows revenue, and a dollar value (revenue – costs) to be derived for that block. The value of the block is then used to optimize a pit shell by evaluating the cost of removing waste blocks above that ore block. If value of the block exceeds the cost of removing those above it (as well as honoring other rules including pit wall angles), then the software will mine that block, and progress on.
A small volume of tantalite concentrate by-product is produced, bagged, and transported offsite for sale. From historical performance, tantalite metal recovery is assigned an average plant recovery of 20%.
12.4 | Optimization Results |
The significant rise in the price of lithium over the past year means the pit optimization can produce very large, high stripping ratio potential pits, to the point where the optimization process becomes resource constrained at prices substantially below the current spot price.
Analysis of the pit shell progression allows selection of the appropriate ultimate shell in relation to the revenue factor and, importantly, consideration of the ‘fit’ of the potential excavation within existing site infrastructure, associated wasted dumps, and company strategy. This has meant that a shell smaller than the Revenue Factor 1 was chosen as the ultimate shell to take into the design process.
A significant step up in strip ratio was identified between two shells, revenue factor 0.735 and revenue factor 0.74, during the analysis of the optimization results. These shells were selected based on their inventory and geometry for progression to pit design. Whilst these shells yield less potential cashflow compared to the optimum Revenue Factor 1 shell, they meet Allkem’s strategy of delivering a reasonable mine life and a more practical footprint than a RF1 shell-based design. Optionality remains to consider larger shells in the future should it be considered appropriate.
Figure 12-4 shows the shell progression chart. These progression charts are used to determine the appropriate shell along with geo-spatial validation to align the selected shell with minimum mining widths. The chosen shell 45 is highlighted in orange with the smaller shell (44) chosen as an interim stage as part of an overall strategy to manage the large strip ratio associated with shell 45.
Figure 12-5 shows the C1 Cost and Incremental Ore Tonnes by Shell.
Figure 12-4 – Summary of Mined Tonnes, Cashflow, and NPV by Shell (NB reported in Australian Dollar currency).
Figure 12-5 – Summary of C1 Cost and Ore Tonnes by Shell (NB reported in Australian Dollar currency).
Table 12-8 compares key data from the selected shells to the RF1 shell.
Table 12-8 – Optimization Shell Summary.
Shell Number | Revenue Factor | Ore (kt) | Undiscounted Cashflow (US$M) |
44 | 0.735 | 3,900 | 600 |
45 | 0.74 | 5,300 | 690 |
86 | 1 | 7,600 | 760 |
12.5 | Pit Design |
The mine design was provided by Allkem and completed by Entech using GEOVIA Surpac software. Optimization shells and the existing mining plan (Stage 3 pit) were used as a guide to identify a practical design for economic extraction.
A Feasibility Study level geotechnical assessment evaluated the potential for slope instabilities and derived slope design parameter recommendations for the Stage 4 pit designs. Pit designs were generated for each of the three stages, Figure 12-6.
Using the selected shells (44 and 45) as a guide to economic extraction limits, detailed designs of each shell were conducted, tying into the existing Stage 3 pit design and ramp strategy. A minimum mining width of 50 m is used based on equipment with a final cut width of 25 m where trucks are not required to enter.
Ramp width and gradients were chosen to match the existing pit and the existing/proposed mining fleet. The ramp system has been designed to minimize waste haulage costs while maintaining easy access to the ROM pad.
The pit design process as described above and using the various criteria detailed above produced practical layouts that can be seen in Chapter 13.4 which also covers inputs and inventories.
Figure 12-6 – Cross section showing the Pit Design Stages Including Ore Zones Colored by Li2O Grade, and 31 March 2023 Topography.
12.6 | Stockpiles |
The site stockpiles are a mix of immediate plant feed such as Run of Mine (ROM) pad ore and crushed ore, as well as ores that will be treated at the end of mine life, pre-closure, or when plant capacity is available such as low-grade ore, fine grained ore, and tailings suitable for retreatment. Final product stocks onsite on 30 June 2023 have been ignored from the cashflow as they have already been processed and are attributable to a period prior to this study, however they are shown in the tabulation below for completeness.
Each stockpile has been assigned a specific grade and recovery, and tested to ensure economic viability at a forecast price appropriate to the likely time the product would be sold into market (Table 12-9).
Table 12-9 – Stockpile Summary at End of June 2023.
Stockpiles | Tonnage | Grade | Grade | Cont. Metal | Cont. Metal |
Mt | % Li2O | ppm Ta2O5 | (‘000) t Li2O | (‘000) lb Ta2O5 | |
Ore | 0.15 | 1 | 110 | 1.5 | 36 |
Fine grained ore | 0.13 | 0.9 | 150 | 1.2 | 44 |
Product | 0.01 | 5.2 | 680 | 0.5 | 13 |
Low grade ore | 0.59 | 0.5 | 67 | 3.2 | 87 |
Tailings | 0.9 | 0.8 | 103 | 7.5 | 200 |
Total | 1.8 | 0.8 | 95 | 14 | 385 |
12.6.1 | Run of Mine Stockpiles |
The Run of Mine (ROM) stockpiles are sourced from end of month survey data. Detail is shown in Table 12-10. Recovery was assigned as per the plant recovery regression curve for the applicable head grade.
Table 12-10 – ROM Stockpile Balance 30 June 2023.
Material | Run of Mine Pad | Crushed (kt) | Total | |||
(kt) | % Li2O | (kt) | % Li2O | (kt) | % Li2O | |
Clean Ore | 24,000 | 1.20 | 16,000 | 1.05 | 39,000 | 1.13 |
Contaminated Ore | 61,000 | 0.99 | 45,000 | 0.90 | 106,000 | 0.95 |
Total | 85,000 | 1.04 | 61,000 | 0.94 | 150,000 | 1.00 |
12.6.2 | Fine Grained Stockpiles |
Fine grained spodumene has a poorer recovery in the DMS plant than the usual coarse-grained ore. In late 2022 when an unexpected amount of fine grained was mined when first exposing the Stage 3 pit ore, and it was stockpiled rather than treated, with preference given to ‘normal’ ore. The stockpile, with approximately 134,000 t of ore has been modelled with a conservatively low (assumed) 20% recovery to be treated at the end of the mine life.
12.6.3 | Low Grade Stockpile |
The low-grade stocks form the base of the RoM pad and will be treated on mine closure. The tonnage and grade data has been sourced from historical records and the economic test has applied a 40% plant recovery to produce a SC5.2 concentrate.
12.6.4 | Pre-2018 Tailings |
Testwork has been ongoing developing a flowsheet for treating the tailings in TSF #1, which were deposited up until 2018, prior to recovery enhancements being made to the plant, and as such have a material amount of recoverable lithia. It is likely the flowsheet will include a flotation circuit, so an assumed capital amount of US$35M has been modelled prior to treatment. There is potential for the flotation circuit to be brought on-stream earlier in the mine life if other sources of applicable feed are available, or if current feeds could undergo improved recovery.
12.7 | Mineral Reserve Estimate |
The Mt Cattlin Mineral Reserve estimate (as of 30 June 2023), expressed to a maximum of two significant figures, is provided in Table 12-11.
Table 12-11 – Mineral Reserve Estimate June 2023.
Category | Location | Tonnage | Grade | Grade | Cont. Metal | Cont. Metal |
Mt | % Li2O | ppm Ta2O5 | (‘000) t Li2O | (‘000) lb. Ta2O5 | ||
Proven | In-situ | 0.2 | 0.9 | 120 | 1.4 | 45 |
Probable | In-situ | 5.2 | 1.3 | 130 | 69 | 1,500 |
Stockpiles | 1.8 | 0.8 | 95 | 13 | 390 | |
Total Mineral Reserves | 7.1 | 1.2 | 120 | 84 | 1,900 |
12.7.1 | Comparison to Previous Estimates |
The previous Mineral Reserve Estimate for the Mt Cattlin operation is provided in Table 12-12 and the absolute and relative comparisons to this estimate, expressed to a maximum of two significant figures, are shown in Table 12-13 and Table 12-14.
Table 12-12 – June 2022 Mineral Reserve Estimate (Allkem), 30 June 2022.
Category | Location | Tonnage |
Grade | Grade | Cont. Metal |
Cont. Metal |
Mt |
% Li2O | ppm Ta2O5 |
(‘000) t Li2O | (‘000) lb Ta2O5 |
||
Proven | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Probable | 2NW only | 3.3 | 1.1 | 105 | 37 | 750 |
Stockpiles | 2.4 | 0.8 | 120 | 19 | 650 | |
Total | 5.8 | 0.98 | 110 | 56 | 1,400 | |
Notes: | ||||||
1) Reported at a cut-off grade of 0.4 % Li2O. | ||||||
2) All tonnages reported are dry metric tonnes. | ||||||
3) Reported with a 17% dilution and 93% mining recovery. | ||||||
4) Revenue factor US$650/tonne applied. Minor discrepancies may occur due to rounding to appropriate significant figures. |
Notes: Reported at a cut-off grade of 0.4 % Li2O. All tonnages reported are dry metric tonnes. Reported with a 17% dilution and 93% mining recovery. Revenue factor US$650/tonne applied. Minor discrepancies may occur due to rounding to appropriate significant figures.
Table 12-13 – Comparison between 30 June 2023 and 30 June 2022 ORE.
Table 12-14 – Relative comparison between 30 June 2023 and 30 June 2022 ORE.
A comparison has been made between the 2022 Mineral Reserve and this updated estimate. Figure 12-7 illustrates the sources of changes in the Mineral Reserve from 2022 to 2023. In general, this Mineral Reserve estimate shows an increase in the ore tonnage with the key drivers being the greater inventory of Indicated material available and the higher optimization price. Offsetting those increases were mining depletion and an increase in operating costs.
Figure 12-7 – Key Changes in Ore Tonnage Waterfall Graph.
12.8 | Risk Factors that could Materially Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimates |
The 2023 Reserve Estimation was completed by Entech, provided to Mining Plus by Allkem, which was reviewed by Mining Plus. This Ore Reserve Estimation was read in conjunction with the Mt Cattlin Stage 4 Expansion Feasibility study, both of which have been relied upon in Mining Plus’ evaluation of this Mineral Reserve estimate.
The review included the following:
● | Reconciliation of the Volumes, Tonnes, Grade and contained metal between the three main stages of the geological block models: |
o | The Original Mining Plus Datamine Resource block model |
o | The Converted Mining Plus Datamine resource block model into a Surpac model |
o | The regularized, diluted Mining Model |
● | Reconciliation of the Volumes, Tonnes, Grade as estimated against the designed pit shell and the mining schedule. |
● | A review of the modifying factors and costs, mining method, production rates and resultant operational schedule and operational cash flow. |
Mt Cattlin has sustainable mining reserves for the next four to five years, with the underlying resource drill constrained and warranting continued exploration. The increasing stripping ratio with the greater depths to access ore via open pit mining methodology is being evaluated against the option of underground mining.
Compared to 2022, the total Ore Reserves have increased despite the normal depletion as a result of mining activities. The increase is attributed to Mineral Resource conversion of Inferred material to Indicated classification from recent infill drilling, and a significant increase in revenue pricing for spodumene concentrate.
The pit staging as applied in this assessment (Stage 3, Stage 4-Phase 1, Stage 4-Phase 2) individually have quite different stripping ratios and risk characteristics to the overall project average. Stage 3 is very low risk and generates the 72% of the overall cashflow, whilst Stage 4-1 which generates 5% of the overall cashflow and Stage 4-2 which generates 18% of overall cashflow have higher stripping ratios and lower returns. The End of Project Stockpiles generate 5% of overall cashflow.
Mt Cattlin will require a series of regulatory permits for the development proposed, including the availability of waste dumping, to achieve the reserves, these are discussed further in Chapter 17.
Historically, disproportionate amounts of fine-grained ore in the ROM feed negatively affected plant recovery in the second half of 2022. This has since been identified in the Mineral Resource and domained out of the new MRE which underpins this ORE.
The Probable ore stockpiles include 900 kt @ 0.8% Li2O of tailings from early project life that are planned to be retreated at mine closure. The economic analysis test has used conservative metal recovery (30%) and product grade specifications (4.5% Li2O) indicated from metallurgical test work to date. Test work and flowsheet development is ongoing and will be required to advance the study level, which has a current accuracy level of pre-feasibility. The contribution of the tailings retreatment at mine closure is not material to the overall project.
Project economics were tested at a range of input sensitivities and showed robustness to 20% adverse moves in a number of key assumptions.
In summary, the planned Mt Cattlin operational schedule for the existing and ongoing mining operation is determined to be technically feasible and profitable within the applied economic assumptions.
12.9 | Recommendations |
It has been recommended that Mt Cattlin consider the following areas for enhancing future Ore Reserve updates:
● | Strengthen the QA/QC processes with the Mining Models. |
● | Continue to evaluate the Mining Model performance against site reconciliation results. |
● | Continuing permitting works to ensure the planned access to cut-backs, waste rock storage and tailings storage facilities does not impede planned operations. |
● | Progress geotechnical trials of pit wall control techniques e.g., pre-splitting to demonstrate the case for safer and steeper wall angles. |
● | Investigate underground mining methods as an alternative to open pit mining as the strip ratio increases. |
● | Continue to develop geo-metallurgical grade control techniques to define and segregate fine grained spodumene for future processing. |
● | Progress the business case for processing the potential low grade fine grained spodumene. |
● | Consider routine grade control programs ahead of ore mining. |
● | Undertake business case analysis of new crushing circuit, power station facilities with at least 40% renewable penetration, and an accommodation village. |
● | Continue progressing the tailings re-treatment flowsheet and economics to build a robust business case, and |
● | Continued resource drilling to further expand the resource and define the limits of mineralization. |
13. Mining Methods
13.1 | Current Mining Methodology |
A conventional hard-rock truck and shovel mining method is employed at Mt Cattlin to mine and deliver ore from a series of open pits to the processing plant.
The ore is delivered to a conventional crushing and dense medium separation (DMS) circuit. During mining operations, a portion of the mined ore is diluted with basalt which is considered a contaminant. The processing plant includes a separate circuit during crushing and screening that utilizes optical sorters to remove basalt material from the process stream.
Earthmoving operations use a mining contractor to conduct all drilling, blasting, load, haul, and ancillary work for the open-cut mining operation.
An underground mining feasibility study was commenced in May 2023 to study the economics on extracting ore via underground method outside of the Stage 4-Phase 1 pit. The outcomes of this study will be used to consider the size of surface waste dumps and whether permitting of Stage 4-Phase 2 open pit and waste dump will be required. There are no underground reserves in the current reserve statement.
13.2 | Mining Equipment and Current Operation |
A conventional hard-rock truck and shovel mining method is currently employed at Mt Cattlin to mine and deliver ore to the processing plant. This mining method is assumed to be continued for the life-of-mine described in this study.
Mining operations involve drilling and blasting the competent ore and waste rock on 10 m high benches, and then mining 2 - 2.5 m high horizontal flitches.
Mining contractors are utilized for all drill and blast, excavate, load, and haul operations. Three main excavating fleets are generally utilized:
● | One (1) 360 t class backhoe configuration excavator with 140 t and 90 t trucks |
● | One (1) 200 t class backhoe configuration excavators matched with 90 t trucks. |
● | One (1) 150 t class backhoe configuration excavators matched with 90 t trucks. |
An additional excavation fleet will be used as required, and ancillary support equipment includes grader, water cart, service trucks, light vehicles, and lighting plants.
The drilling and blasting fleet comprise of:
● | Five (5) Atlas Copco D65 down the hole hammer drills |
● | One (1) Atlas Copco L8 down the hole hammer drill |
● | One (1) Multi-Purpose Unit explosives truck. |
Two additional large excavators have also been available on site to provide back-up, undertake ancillary work, and bolster production as needed. The mining fleet configuration is influenced by the production rate, mill throughput, strip ratio and the extents of the proposed pit designs.
Table 13-1 – Load and Haul Equipment Fleet.
Equipment Type | Equipment Model | Quantity | Class |
Excavator | Hitachi EX3600 excavator | 1 | 360t |
Excavator | Hitachi EX1900 excavator | 1 | 200t |
Excavator | Leibherr 9150 excavator | 2 | 150t |
Truck | Caterpillar 785C | 4 | 140t |
Truck | Caterpillar 777 | 14 | 90t |
Truck | Komatsu 785 | 5 | 90t |
Blasthole Drill Rig | Epiroc Atlas Copco D65/T45 | 6 | |
Water Cart | 1 | ||
MPU Charge Unit | 1 | ||
Service Truck | 1 |
The 360-t excavator fleet will remove the majority of the bulk waste in each stage, assisted by the smaller fleets when working area allows. The smaller fleets will focus on selective ore mining, and waste removal in the more constrained working areas of the lower benches.
Ore is contained within the gently dipping white pegmatite intrusions which are visually distinct from the dark volcanic waste rocks. Grade control is undertaken by visual geological inspection of blast hole chips, and visual geological control of the excavator when mining ore (“ore spotting”). Ore mining rates are based on providing continuous feed to the nominal 1.8 Mtpa processing plant.
The current North-West pit (Stage 3 NW) mines only one pegmatite at the base, whilst the Stage 4
NW extension will deepen to capture a second lower pegmatite, as well as progressing down dip to further access both ore zones. The current pit depth of approximately 100 m below surface will extend to approximately 220 m below surface in the
ultimate pit which has a 20:1 stripping ratio.
Waste rock is deposited in pre-designed Waste Rock Landforms or is used to backfill retired pits where practical.
Ground water is relatively scarce, and approximately 5 l/s of overall seepage is captured in floor sumps and pumped to the process water circuit for use in the plant.
13.3 | Mine Services and Infrastructure |
As an existing operation, Mt Cattlin has in place all the required services and infrastructure to cater for the Stage 4 mine expansion as detailed in this study.
The pit rim cutbacks for Stages 4-1 and 4-2, and establishment of Waste Dump 3 (WD3) will require clearing and grubbing of the expanded footprints, and retention of vegetation and topsoil for rehabilitation use. A new site access road including a gatehouse facility for site security will be required to be developed around WD3.
Mining supporting infrastructure is further discussed in Chapter 15.1.
13.4 | Mine Design |
A detailed Feasibility Study level geotechnical assessment was carried out as part of the Stage 4 Expansion Feasibility Study. This study evaluated the potential for slope instabilities and derived slope design parameter recommendations for the Stage 4 expansion.
Using the selected shells (44 and 45) as a guide to economic extraction limits, detailed designs of each shell were conducted, tying into the existing Stage 3 pit design and ramp strategy. A minimum mining width of 50 m is used based on equipment with the final cut width of 25 m where trucks are not required to enter (“goodbye cut”).
Ramp width and gradients were chosen to match the existing pit and the existing/proposed mining fleet. The ramp system has been designed to minimize waste haulage costs while maintaining easy access to the ROM pad.
13.4.1 | Geotechnical |
Rock mass conditions encountered to date are relatively uniform with minor variation between the dedicated geotechnical diamond drill holes. However, relatively poorer rock mass conditions are encountered in the highly weathered zones and locally within proximity to dykes and faults. Joints make up the major rock mass structure at Mt Cattlin encountered during logging. Structural data indicates that the major structure set present is related to a sub-horizontal joint set.
As part of the Feasibility Study a geotechnical assessment for the NW Stage expansion (“Mt Cattlin” and “the Project”) was undertaken. The geotechnical assessment evaluates the potential for slope instabilities and derives slope design parameter recommendations for the proposed open pit mining of the NW Stage 4 pit at Mt Cattlin.
13.4.1.1 | Data Availability |
A geotechnical drilling program was designed to investigate ground conditions specific to the NW Stage 4 cutback. In addition, a geotechnical material properties testing program was designed to capture information pertinent to characterizing and understanding the mechanical behavior of the different materials expected to be encountered.
A total of three dedicated geotechnical diamond drill holes, totaling 651 m, were drilled in the vicinity of the Stage 4 pit walls as seen in Figure 13-1 (which used a preliminary version of the Stage 4 design for drillhole planning) with hole details listed in Table 13-2. Detailed geotechnical data, including rock mass and structure characterization, and oriented structure data were collected from these drill holes and used in the analysis. In addition to these holes, photogrammetric modelling of the current pit, structure digitization, in-pit mapping and data from previous studies was utilized.
Figure 13-1 – Plan view of Mt Cattlin, with the location of the geotechnical drill holes and basic pit dimensions.
Table 13-2 – Summary of the dedicated geotechnical diamond drill holes used for the project.
DHID | X | Y | Z | Depth1 | Dip | Dip-Dir |
GTNW007 | 223,799 | 6,282,192 | 271 | 200 | -78 | 229 |
GTNW008 | 223,861 | 6,282,628 | 270 | 249 | -75 | 133 |
GTNW009 | 224,231 | 6,282,724 | 260 | 202 | -70 | 2 |
1Downhole depth. |
According to Bieniawski’s Rock Mass Rating 1989, the major rock types encountered can be summarized as shown in Table 13-3.
Table 13-3 – Major Rock Types.
Rock Type | Weathering | RMR-89 Classification |
Andesite | Transitional | Good rock |
Fresh | Good rock | |
Basalt | Transitional | Fair rock |
Fresh | Good rock | |
Dacite | Fresh | Good rock |
Dolerite | Fresh | Good rock |
Intermediate volcanic | Transitional | Good rock |
Fresh | Good rock | |
Pegmatite | Fresh | Good rock |
Tonalite | Fresh | Very good rock |
Rock mass conditions encountered are relatively uniform with minor variation between the dedicated geotechnical diamond drill holes. However, relatively poorer rock mass conditions are encountered in the highly weathered zones and locally within proximity to dykes and faults.
Samples were selected from the drill core of the dedicated geotechnical diamond drill holes to perform material properties testing. This program included the following (as shown in Figure 13-2 and Figure 13-3):
● | Six (6) particle size distributions |
● | Six (6) Atterberg Limits |
● | Five (5) multi-stage consolidated undrained triaxial tests |
● | 34 uniaxial compressive strength tests |
● | 35 uniaxial tensile strength tests |
● | 28 elastic constant (Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s Ratio) test |
● | One (1) ring shear test |
● | 18 direct shear tests of natural defects |
The following color coding has been applied in Figure 13-2 and Figure 13-3:
● | Red = UCSE, Uniaxial Comprehensive Strength and Uniaxial Tensile Strength test |
● | Orange = Direct Shear test |
● | Light blue = Atterberg Limits, Particle Size Distribution and consolidated Undrained Triaxial test sample |
● | Dark blue = Ring Shear test. |
Figure 13-2 – Plan view of preliminary Stage 4 pit design, with the location of laboratory test samples along each drill hole.
Figure 13-3 – Long-section view of preliminary Stage 4 pit design (looking east), with the location of laboratory test samples along each drill hole.
13.4.1.2 | Geotechnical Conditions |
Volcanic rockmass dominates the local geology, with a high portion represented as andesite, basalt, and dacite rock types. This sequence is locally known as the Annabelle volcanic sequence with the relative proportions of rock types, according to Witt (1998), being approximately as follows:
● | 5% dolerite |
● | 10-20% basalt |
● | 50-70% andesite |
● | 20-30% dacite (Witt, 1998). |
The lithium rich mineralization is hosted within the pegmatite and occurs as a series of sub-horizontal sills overlapping in sections and surrounded by both volcanic and intrusive dolerite dykes. Two major faults have been modelled as steeply dipping and striking north north-west and east south-east, respectively.
The depth to the Base of Complete Oxidation (BOCO) wireframe at the Mt Cattlin pit walls is on average 6.5 meters below surface (mbs). The geotechnical logging encountered the BOCO at an average depth of 5 mbs at Mt Cattlin. The depth to the Top of Fresh Rock (TOFR) wireframe at the Mt Cattlin pit walls is on average 25 mbs. The geotechnical logging encountered the TOFR at a depth of 43 mbs at Mt Cattlin. It is noted that the geological TOFR wireframe has been modelled shallower than the interpretation of the drill core data. The likely cause of this difference is due to the weathering classification system used during the geotechnical logging which is based on the International Society of Rock Mechanics (ISRM) classification system (1982). The interpretation of ‘Fresh Rock’ under the ISRM method requires no visible signs of weathering, perhaps slight discoloration on major discontinuity surfaces. This is often not possible to distinguish from reverse circulation drilling chips.
The structural model contains structures that were observed at a drill core scale (Figure 13-4), as well as structures that were digitized on a 3D photogrammetric model (Figure 13-5). A total of 812 structure measurements were collected from drill core, with an additional 1,123 structure measurements collected from photogrammetric model digitization and 42 structures from pit wall mapping (total of 1,977).
Figure 13-4 – Long-section view of a preliminary Stage 4 pit design (looking east).
Figure 13-5 – Photogrammetric model and digitized structures in the Stage 4 pit.
All structure data has been grouped together (Figure 13-6), with the assumption that it is possible for any structure set to be able to occur anywhere within the given pit. This is a simplification and conservative approach. However, the structure sets are largely represented spatially throughout the deposit. Ongoing geotechnical mapping of the pit walls during mining will be required to confirm and improve the structural model.
Joints make up the major rock mass structure at Mt Cattlin. Various joint sets were identified within the data gathered, these have been analyzed and presented below.
The structure data is deemed to be a good indication of the structure sets present. The drill holes were orientated in varying directions; ~90° variation between the dip direction of each hole.
Figure 13-6 – Stereonet plot generated in Dips 8.0 displaying all major structures at Mt Cattlin (based on all data sources combined).
The structure sets defined at Mt Cattlin are summarized as follows:
1) | 07 / 005 |
2) | 34 / 159 |
3) | 80 / 262 |
4) | 85 / 84 |
5) | 81 / 171 |
6) | 83 / 348. |
13.4.1.3 | Geotechnical Model |
Geotechnical input parameters for intact rock and rock mass strength have been developed based on information gathered from the geotechnical logging and laboratory testing programs. Lithological and structural wireframes utilized in the geotechnical model created can be seen in Figure 13-7.
The suite of geotechnical logging and material properties testing provides a robust overview of the variable nature of rock types encountered and prior experience.
Figure 13-7 – Plan view of a preliminary Stage 4 pit design with related dyke and fault models provided by Allkem.
13.4.1.4 | Geotechnical Domains |
The geotechnical domains created for the purpose of the stability analysis have been expressed in terms of material type and weathering state, with a “likely” (average) condition and a “lower bound” (average less one standard deviation) condition to capture the range of potential materials encountered. The parameters for each of these cases have been displayed in Table 13-4.
Due to the varying material types identified during logging within the oxide and transitional zone, simplified domains were created. The oxide domain has considered rock types classified as completely weathered or extremely weathered, and the transitional domain has considered rockmass classified as highly weathered, moderately weathered, and slightly weathered. This is to ensure the input parameters for the analysis completed below accounts for all rock types within the domain.
Andesite was used as the primary host rock within the fresh domain. This is due to Andesite material being the most frequently occurring rock type during the logging of the three (3) geotechnical holes, slightly ahead of Basalt. It is also noted that Andesite is deemed to be the more conservative material type in relation to Basalt when considering the laboratory testing data.
The geotechnical domains for Mt Cattlin are described as:
● | Oxide – lower bound |
● | Oxide – likely |
● | Transitional – lower bound |
● | Transitional – likely |
● | Andesite (Fresh) – lower bound |
● | Andesite (Fresh) – likely |
● | Pegmatite (Fresh) – lower bound |
● | Pegmatite (Fresh) – likely |
● | Dolerite Dyke – lower bound |
● | Dolerite Dyke – likely |
Table 13-4 – Summary of the ‘likely’ and ‘lower bound’ geotechnical input parameters for slope stability analysis.
Geotechnical Domain | Unit Weight (kN/m3) | Hoek-Brown | Mohr-Coulomb | ||||||||||
UCS (MPa) | GSI | mi | E (GPa) | D | C’ (kPa) | Φ’ (°) | |||||||
‘Likely’ | |||||||||||||
Oxide | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | 52 | 31 | |||||
Transitional | 27.6 | 172 | 58 | 12 | 84 | 1 | 1,602 | 40 | |||||
Fresh – Andesite | 28.2 | 261 | 70 | 12 | 96 | 1 | 3,839 | 49 | |||||
Fresh – Pegmatite | 25.9 | 102 | 71 | 17 | 58 | 1 | 2,122 | 47 | |||||
Dolerite Dyke | 18.5 | - | - | - | - | - | 60 | 43 | |||||
Fault | 28.2 | - | - | - | - | - | 50 | 20 | |||||
‘Lower bound’ | |||||||||||||
Oxide | 17 | - | - | - | - | 21 | 24 | ||||||
Transitional | 26.6 | 67 | 46 | 12 | 57 | 1 | 669 | 26 | |||||
Fresh – Andesite | 26.3 | 223 | 62 | 10 | 87 | 1 | 2,137 | 43 | |||||
Fresh – Pegmatite | 25.6 | 59 | 64 | 9 | 47 | 1 | 1,075 | 33 | |||||
Dolerite Dyke | 18.5 | - | - | - | - | - | 60 | 43 | |||||
Fault | 26.3 | - | - |
- |
- |
- |
50 |
20 |
13.4.1.5 | Design Analysis |
Slope design modelling and analysis was undertaken, including kinematic and limit equilibrium slope stability analysis, to develop the slope design parameter recommendations.
The Slope Design Acceptance Criteria outlined within the publication, Guidelines for Open Pit Slope Design (Read and Stacey, 2009) were adopted and can be seen below in Table 13-5.
Table 13-5 – Typical design Factor of Safety (FoS) and Probability of Failure (PoF) acceptance criteria for open pit mining (Read and Stacey, 2009).
Slope Scale | Consequence of Failure | Minimum FoS – Static Conditions | Minimum FoS – Dynamic Conditions | Maximum PoF (that FoS < 1) |
Low–high | Low–high |
1.1 | NA | 25–50 |
Bench Stack or | Low | 1.15–1.2 | 1 | 25 |
Inter-Ramp | Medium | 1.2
|
1 | 20 |
High | 1.2–1.3
|
1.1 | 10 | |
Overall | Low | 1.2–1.3 | 1 | 15–20 |
Medium | 1.3 | 1.05 | 5–10 | |
High | 1.3–1.5 | 1.1 | ≤5 |
Geotechnical input parameters for intact rock and rock mass strength were developed based on information gathered from the geotechnical logging and material properties testing programs and prior case studies.
The kinematic analysis was conducted on slope directions ranging from 0° to 360° to cover all major pit wall exposures. The results indicated the probability of any of the three batter-scale failure modes (planar, wedge and toppling (flexural and direct)) occurring on the major pit walls at a bench face angle between 40° and 75° is generally low with results being within 0.2% and 12.36%. This is deemed to be within the acceptable limits of design. A failure mode type of “wedge sliding failure” reported the highest percentage of failures across the three batter-scale failure modes, particularly in the north-east wall sector within fresh material. Planar sliding recorded the lowest percentage failures with all Batter Face Angles (BFA) and slope direction combinations recording below 5.16%.
Bench and berm configurations developed in the kinematic and spill berm width analysis in conjunction with experience in similar settings and review of similar geotechnical engineering literature, were used when creating the inter-ramp and overall slope angles in the limit equilibrium slope stability models. The limit equilibrium analysis indicated slope instability at an inter-ramp or overall (pit) scale is unlikely within the designed pit.
Stability analysis was undertaken using the software package Slide 9.0 (Rocscience, 2022). Slide is a 2D limit equilibrium slope stability program for evaluating the FoS of circular or non-circular failure surfaces in soil or rock slopes. Slide analyses the stability of slip surfaces using vertical slice or non-vertical slice limit equilibrium methods. Stability sections were analyzed at an inter-ramp and overall scale. Dry conditions, as well as cases including a water table (phreatic surface), were analyzed. Seismic cases were ignored.
The highest/steepest slopes for the major pit walls were chosen for analysis. The sections for the stability analysis are shown in Figure 13-8.
Design slope angles have been used when creating the Slide model. The geotechnical input parameters for intact rock and rock mass strength have been developed based on information gathered from the geotechnical logging and material properties testing programs. Due to lithological wireframes for Mt Cattlin being unavailable, andesite was selected as the major rock type within the fresh domain. Andesite was the highest percentage logged rockmass in the geotechnical drilling program completed as part of this Project and it has been stated that the Annabelle volcanics (the primary host rock) are made up of 5% dolerite, 10-20% basalt, 50-70% andesite and 20-30% dacite (Witt, 1998).
To understand the effect of the modelled faults on the proposed open pit design, scenarios for both the “likely” and “lower bound” material properties were investigated. However, it should be noted that the effect of faults on pit slope stability is expected to be very spatially limited, and results with fault planes modelled should be viewed with this in mind.
Numerous search and analysis methods for circular and non-circular failure surfaces were computed to determine the global/critical minimum failure surfaces. Cuckoo search and Janbu analysis methods for non-circular failure surfaces are reported in the results, which generally compute the lowest global/critical minimum failure surfaces.
Results for the stability analysis are presented in Table 13-6, and indicate the current design will be stable for inter-ramp and overall slope scales. An example of a Slide analysis for the major pit walls is shown in Figure 13-9 (Section A) and Figure 13-10 (Section B).
The results from the Slide analysis indicate:
● | For all cases, the FoS values achieved acceptance criteria. |
● | The lower bound critical path for the south-west wall (in both the dry and wet scenario) achieved a FoS of 1.24, with the failure path occurring across multiple benches. This failure is primarily driven by the interaction with the modelled fault; however, the results sit within the minimum acceptance criteria. |
● | As this failure is solely driven by the interaction with the modelled fault, it is recommended that further investigative works are completed to confirm the presence and potential impact of the fault to ensure the pit wall does not interact with this structure unfavorably. This may include (but is not limited to) bench by bench pit wall mapping, further investigative drilling (where appropriate), re-interpretation of the fault (if/where ground-truthing has occurred) and update of the pit design accordingly. |
● | The slopes are largely not sensitive to water. However, this may in part be due to over-simplification of the model and lack of available hydrogeological information. The drawdown of the water table with mining should be closely monitored to confirm this, and remodeled if it deviates significantly from assumptions contained in this report. |
● | Failure mechanisms influencing slope stability that cannot be captured in 2D Slide analysis, including geometry, structure, time-dependence, and reactivity to water, must be factored into the design in other ways. |
To determine the appropriate design parameters for all walls of the pit, the Stage 4 NW pit was divided into four geotechnical pit design sectors. These sectors are known as North, East, South and West and are illustrated in Figure 13-8. As a result of the testing completed utilizing various scenarios and material property parameters, the slope design parameters deemed suitable for each pit sector have been provided in Table 13-6.
Figure 13-8 – Plan view of the preliminary Stage 4 pit design, with the location of Section A and Section B for stability analysis.
Table 13-6 – Summary of Stability Analysis Results.
Section | Material Properties | Water | FoS | |
Critical Path | Overall | |||
Section A (North-west wall) | Lower bound | Dry | 2.3 | 3.06 |
Section A (North-west wall) | Lower bound | Wet | 2.31 | 2.39 |
Section A (North-west wall) | Likely | Dry | 4.82 | 4.82 |
Section A (North-west wall) | Likely | Wet | 4.04 | 4.05 |
Section B (South-west wall) | Lower bound | Dry | 1.24 | 3.22 |
Section B (South-west wall) | Lower bound | Wet | 1.24 | 3.22 |
Section B (South-west wall) | Likely | Dry | 2.32 | 4.27 |
Section B (South-west wall) | Likely | Wet | 2.3 | 4.11 |
Section A (North-west wall) | Lower bound (no faults) | Dry | 2.3 | 3.06 |
Section A (North-west wall) | Lower bound (no faults) | Wet | 2.31 | 2.39 |
Section A (North-west wall) | Likely (no faults) | Dry | 4.82 | 4.82 |
Section A (North-west wall) | Likely (no faults) | Wet | 4.04 | 4.05 |
Section B (South-west wall) | Lower bound (no faults) | Dry | 2.79 | 3.22 |
Section B (South-west wall) | Lower bound (no faults) | Wet | 2.78 | 3.22 |
Section B (South-west wall) | Likely (no faults) | Dry | 4.27 | 4.27 |
Section B (South-west wall) | Likely (no faults) | Wet | 3.55 | 4.11 |
Condition: North-west wall – critical failure – lower bound material properties – wet.
Figure 13-9 – Slide section for Section A, looking north-east.
Condition: south-west wall – critical failure – lower bound material properties – wet.
Figure 13-10 – Slide section for Section B, looking north-west Slope Design Parameters.
The design analyzed within the feasibility report was a preliminary design based upon design parameters developed. The only material variation in pit geometry was the final design utilizing switch back ramps predominantly on the southern side, creating a western highwall more than 150 m vertical, which in the preliminary design was bisected by a wrap-around ramp. Without the ramp, the highwall was required to be modified by the inclusion of a 12 m wide berm to geotechnically decouple the upper and lower portions of the slope.
From the analysis conducted; it was identified that the modelled steeply dipping faults interact with the designed pit wall in the south sector of the pit. This interaction may cause local instability which will inevitably reduce the overall stability of the pit wall. It is recommended that further investigative works are completed to confirm the exact presence of the faults to ensure the pit wall does not interact with this structure unfavorably.
13.4.1.6 | Design Parameter Recommendations |
Slope design modelling and analysis was undertaken, including kinematic and limit equilibrium slope stability analysis, to develop the slope design parameter recommendations. The Stage 4 NW pit was divided into four geotechnical pit design sectors with the slope design parameters deemed suitable for each pit sector shown in Table 13-7 with slope terminology illustrated in Figure 13-11.
Figure 13-11 – Pit slope design elements, geometries, and terminology.
The design criteria for the various pit sectors and domains are shown in Table 13-7.
Table 13-7 – Slope Design Parameter Recommendations for Mt Cattlin NW Stage 4.
Sectors | From/To | Domains | Bench Height (m) | Bench Face Angle (°) | Spill Berm Width (m) | Inter-Ramp Angle (°) |
North | Surface to 5mbs | Oxide | 10 | 50 | 6.5 | 33.9 |
5mbs to 40mbs | Transitional | 20 | 60 | 8.5 | 44.9 | |
40mbs to Base of Pit | Fresh | 20 | 70 | 8.5 | 51.7 | |
East | Surface to 5mbs | Oxide | 10 | 50 | 6.5 | 33.9 |
5mbs to 40mbs | Transitional | 20 | 60 | 8.5 | 44.9 | |
40mbs to Base of Pit | Fresh | 20 | 70 | 8.5 | 51.7 | |
South | Surface to 5mbs | Oxide | 5 | 50 | 6.5 | 33.9 |
5mbs to 40mbs | Transitional | 20 | 60 | 8.5 | 44.9 | |
40mbs to Base of Pit | Fresh | 20 | 70 | 8.5 | 51.7 | |
West | Surface to 5mbs | Oxide | 5 | 50 | 6.5 | 33.9 |
5mbs to 40mbs | Transitional | 20 | 60 | 8.5 | 44.9 | |
40mbs to Base of Pit | Fresh | 20 | 70 | 8.5 | 51.7 |
13.4.2 | Hydrological |
Hydrological data from the Stage 4 Expansion study was considered in the future mine designs, including topography and catchment areas surrounding the site as well as current and future modelled groundwater quality and impacts of mining.
Further information on surface and groundwater are found in Chapter 17 Environmental.
13.4.3 | Haul Road Parameters |
Haul road width is determined by the safe operating procedures in addition to efficiency trade-offs related to single/double lanes and the impact this has on overall pit strip ratio. Haul road width sizing is based on a multiple of the largest truck used (in this case the Caterpillar 785 or equivalent) allowing for a drain, sufficient clearance on both sides, and a safety berm constructed to axle height as visualized in Figure 13-12 and further detailed in Table 13-8 . The total haul road design width used was 20 m for single lane, and 35 m for double lane. These widths have been used for all the in-pit haul road designs.
Figure 13-12 – Haul Road Schematic.
Table 13-8 – Haul Road Parameters.
Model – Caterpillar 785 | Unit | Value | |
A | Operating Width | m | 8 |
B | Bund Height | m | 1.2 |
C | Bund Width | m | 3.8 |
D | Drain Width | m | 1 |
E1 | Minimum Pavement (2.0 x A) – Single Lane | m | 16 |
E2 | Minimum Pavement (3.2 x A) – Dual Lane | m | 25.6 |
13.4.4 | Pit Design |
The pit design process as described above and using the various criteria detailed above produced practical layouts that can be seen in the section below in plan view and long section and illustrated with ore blocks colored by grade.
The Stage 3 open pit design is per the current pit being excavated onsite which aligns with the 2022 Mineral Reserve. The remaining Stage 3 inventory as of 30 June 2023 is reported in Table 13-9
Table 13-9 – Stage 3 Inventory as of 30 June 2023.
Summary | Units | Pit Design |
Ore | Mt | 1.9 |
Waste | Mt | 6.7 |
Strip Ratio | w:o | 3.5 |
Grade | % Li2O | 1.5 |
Yield | % | 0.19 |
Concentrate | kt | 340 |
The Stage 4-1 open pit design utilizes a double lane ramp at the pit crest entry on the north-eastern wall, ramping down to the west then south before continuing to circle around to the south wall, where the dual ramp system ends at the 130 m RL. A single lane ramp system starts again at the 130 m RL on the north wall before circling down to the 70 m RL.
The Stage 4-1 open pit design is approximately 650 m long (WSW-ENE), 580 m wide (ESE-WNW) and 210 m deep mining a total of 60 Mt of material, inclusive of Stage 3 as shown in Figure 13-13 and Figure 13-14.
Figure 13-13 – Stage 4-1 Showing Dimensions in Plan View with Ore Blocks Colored by Li2O Grade.
The Stage 3 pit is currently mining ore at approximately 155 m RL. The pit extends to the base of the orebody contact but the guiding optimization shell did not carry the additional waste required to access the higher-grade material to the west at depth (seen as ore blocks outside the pit in Figure 13-14). Conversely the lower grade material to the south (below old workings) does not have the grade required to be cash flow positive and is therefore ignored in the shell and resultant design. The Stage 3 inventory is listed in Table 13-10
A comparison of the Stage 4-1 designed pit (inclusive of Stage 3) to the optimization shell metrics are listed in Table 13-10.
Figure 13-14 – Stage 4-1 Long Section 6,282,520 mN showing Pit Depth.
The pit design captures 3% less ore at a similar grade when compared to the optimized shell due to practical constraints honored by the design, table 13-10.
Table 13-10 – Stage 4-1 Inventory and Whittle Shell. Values include Stage 3 below June Topography.
Summary | Units | Pit Design | Whittle Shell #44 | Delta |
Ore | Mt | 3.4 | 3.4 | 87% |
Waste | Mt | 53.3 | 43.1 | 124% |
Strip Ratio (overall) | w:o | 15.8 | 12.8 | 123% |
Grade | % Li2O | 1.37 | 1.37 | 100% |
Yield | % | 0.18 | 0.18 | 100% |
Concentrate | kt | 546 | 681 | 98% |
The Stage 4-2 pit design utilizes a double lane ramp at the pit crest entry on the north-western wall, ramping down the west wall then to the south before switching backing at the 175 m RL and again at the 135 m RL and 100 m RL. At this point, the ramp switches to a single lane ramp which continues down to the 40 m RL as can be seen in Figure 13-15.
The Stage 4-2 design is approximately 850 m long (WSW-ENE), 760 m wide (SSE-NNW) and 245 m deep mining a total of 131 Mt of material, inclusive of Stage 3 and Stage 4-1. The design captures 15% more ore at a 4% lower grade than the optimized shell and the lower grade additional ore has reduced the overall head grade slightly Table 13-11.
Figure 13-15 – Stage 4-2 Showing Dimensions in Plan View with Ore Blocks Colored by Li2O Grade.
Figure 13-16 – Stage 42 Long Section 6,282,520 mN.
Table 13-11 – Stage 4-2 Inventory and Whittle Shell. Values include Stage 4-1 and Stage 3 below June Topography.
Summary | Units | Pit Design | Whittle Shell #45 | Delta |
Ore | Mt | 5.4 | 4.6 | 117% |
Waste | Mt | 121 | 84 | 144% |
Strip Ratio (overall) | w:o | 22.6 | 18.1 | 125% |
Grade | % Li2O | 1.32 | 1.37 | 96% |
Yield | % | 0.17 | 0.17 | 100% |
Concentrate | kt | 823 | 734 | 110% |
Figure 13-17 and Figure 13-18 show an overview of the interaction between the pit design Stage 4-1 and Stage 4-2 in plan view and long section.
Figure 13-17 – Interaction of Stage 4-1 and Stage 4-2 Designs in Plan View.
Figure 13-18 – Cross section showing the Pit Design Stages Including Ore Zones Colored by Li2O Grade, and 31 March 2023 Topography.
13.4.5 | Waste Rock Disposal |
The waste rock disposal sequence is optimized by the scheduling software to define the most cost-effective approach available, while honoring the applied waste dumping constraints. The layout of the dumping locations and pit design rims is shown in Figure 13-19.
Figure 13-19 – Pit Design Outlines and Waste Dump Locations.
Allkem supplied the waste dumping constraints and sequence shown below in Table 13-12 to be implemented in the schedule.
Table 13-12 – Waste Dumping Constraints.
Priority | Dumping by Stage | Capacity | Unit | Stage Allocation |
1 | Waste Dump 2 - NW Part 1 | 1.9 | M BCM | Stage 3 |
2 | Waste Dump 2 - NW Part 2 | 0.8 | M BCM | Stage 3 |
Stage 4-1 | ||||
3 | NE Void Backfill 270 mRL Design | 4.2 | M BCM | Stage 3 |
Stage 4-1 | ||||
Stage 4-2 | ||||
4 | Waste Dump 3 | 16.7 | M BCM | Stage 4-1 |
Stage 4-2 | ||||
5 | Waste Dump 4 | 17.1 | M BCM | Stage 4-1 |
Stage 4-2 | ||||
Total | 40.8 | M BCM |
13.5 | Mine Scheduling |
A Life of Mine (LOM) schedule to economically extract the Ore Reserve material was developed in GEOVIA MineSched software using the physical quantities reported from the optimized pit designs.
As the operation is located close to the town of Ravensthorpe, strict noise emission limitations ultimately effect the overall size of the fleet and the size of the individual items of machinery. Sensitive noise receptors, located to the south of the mine, require a waste dumping sequence that builds a southern noise barrier, and then progresses dumping northwards. Wind direction can have a significant short-term effect on the perception of noise and must be managed by daily scheduling flexibility.
Mining dilution and recovery factors used in developing the schedules are outlined in Chapter 11.
The 360-t excavator fleet will remove the majority of the bulk waste in each stage, assisted by the smaller fleets when working area allows. The smaller fleets will focus on selective ore mining, and waste removal in the more constrained working areas of the lower benches.
High strip ratios and ramp access will occasionally limit the production rate due to a practical bench turnover constraint and limited working space. The mining sequence must be executed in order from the existing Stage 3 to Stage 4-1, and then onto the final Stage 4-2. There are several factors influencing the sequence, including managing the interface between the current active pit/s and the cutbacks, access to feed material, and minimum working area.
A mining fleet production target of 12 M BCM per annum including availability, utilization, and efficiency factors has been applied in conjunction with a 1.8 Mt per annum processing target.
Due to the constraints placed on the mining sequence with integrating the existing Stage 3 pit, permitting approval timelines, practical bench turnover rates, practical vertical advance, and high stripping ratios, the process plant does not always have ore available at the nominal capacity.
Figure 13-20 and Figure 13-21 show the process plant feed by pit stage, by Clean and Contaminated ore, and by head grade.
Figure 13-20 – Scheduled Process Plant Feed by Pit Stage.
Figure 13-21 – Scheduled Process Plant Feed by Clean and Contaminated Ore.
The mine schedule start is defined as of July 1, 2023. Scheduling has been undertaken on monthly schedule periods to provide appropriate resolution for downstream financial modelling and for use in site production planning.
Figure 13-22 shows total excavation by period and cut-back stage. The total potential fleet capacity is not always achieved, due mainly to practical bench turnover constraints.
Figure 13-22 – Total Material Movement by Pit Stage (BCM).
Figure 13-23 shows the timing of in-situ ore presentation in the mining sequence by stage. The high strip ratios for Stage 4-1 and Stage 4-2 means there are periods of no ore due to the volume of waste to be removed and bench turnover limits.
Figure 13-23 – Ore (t) Removed by Pit Stage.
Figure 13-24 – ROM Balance (BCM).
Contaminated ore is taken to the Tomra ore sorter for beneficiation to become clean ore. During this process 50% of the mass in the form of basalt is removed from the material. The metal is also reduced by half, maintaining the Li2O diluted head grade of the cleaned material. The clean material is now added to the Clean ore ROM feed for processing. Results from the schedule can be seen in Table 13-13.
Table 13-13 – Tomra Beneficiation and Mill Feed (incl. ROM Stocks).
Process | Material Description | Mass (Mt) | Li2O |
Tomra | Contaminated ore feed | 0.72 | 0.66 |
DMS | Clean ore from Tomra | 0.35 | 0.66 |
Clean ore in situ | 4.6 | 1.4 | |
Total DMS Feed | 5 | 1.3 |
Opening ROM stocks as seen in (Figure 13-24) has been taken from the provided site monthly production reconciliation spreadsheet as of 1 July 2023, and applied to the ex-pit schedule in the cashflow model.
14. Processing and Recovery Methods
The Mt Cattlin processing plant is located to the west of the mine, approximately 2 km northwest of the Ravensthorpe town site.
14.1 | Process Development |
14.1.1 | Early Operations (2010-2016) |
Mt Cattlin operations commenced in October 2010 with the ramp-up continuing throughout 2011. The original plant consisted of a four-stage crushing circuit producing a -6 mm product from ROM ore at a treatment rate of 1 million tonnes per annum. The crushing plant ran on day shift only, providing feed to an ore bin, which fed the concentrator on a continuous 24 hour per day basis.
The concentrator included a reflux classifier for mica removal, and dual size stream, two stage Dense Medium Separation (DMS) cyclones. The final spodumene concentrate was stacked on a pad adjacent to the plant area, drained and then hauled by road to Esperance Port for shipment in bulk. Coarse waste DMS plant float material was conveyed to the Rejects Load Out Bin and hauled by truck to mined portions of the pit(s) to be used as back-fill or as road base.
The DMS pre-screen undersize (-0.5 mm) was treated by gravity separation using spiral classifiers and shaking tables to recover a tantalite concentrate, which was contract dressed and sold, or stockpiled at site depending on the price.
Tantalite circuit tailings and other plant spillage streams were directed to a thickener for process water recovery. The thickener underflow was pumped to the tailings storage facility, approximately 500 m north of the plant.
14.1.2 | Operations (2016-2018) |
In 2016, process modifications were implemented to target an increased processing throughput of 1.6 million tonnes per annum of ROM ore. The significant process changes implemented included:
● | Change from 4 stage to 3 stage crushing. |
● | Change of crusher top size from -6 mm to -12 mm |
● | Modified wet screen to cut at 1 mm. |
● | Other size fraction changes for spirals and DMS plant |
● | Addition of reflux classifiers and vacuum belt filter following the spirals to recover product from the wet screen undersize |
● | DMS reflux classifier only used for fine size fraction of DMS feed. |
14.1.3 | Yield Optimization Project (2018–Present) |
Beginning in 2019, additional improvements were made to the flowsheet as part of the Yield Optimization Project (YOP), which was designed to improve yield and increase throughput of ROM ore to 1.8 million tonnes per annum.
These changes included:
● | Further optimization of size fractions for Wet Plant feed and feed to the DMS Plant |
● | Reliberation circuit for the Secondary DMS rejects to recover spodumene composited with gangue material. |
● | Replacement of the Vacuum Belt Filter with Wet High Intensity Magnetic Separation and an Ultrafine DMS circuit for recovery of spodumene from the Wet Screen undersize |
● | Introduction of a Product Quality Upgrade (PQU) circuit containing a Wet Belt Magnetic Separator and an Optical Sorter for removal of basalt to improve product grade. |
In early 2019, two in-series optical sorters were introduced in the crushing circuit to process ongoing and previously stockpiled material classed as ‘contaminated’ and not suitable for plant feed. Subsequent optimization exercises and equipment upgrades allowed for parallel sorter operation and increased processing rates. This circuit produces plant feed from previously unsuitable basalt contaminated material.
The current process flowsheet is summarized in Figure 14-1.
14.2 | Detailed Process Description |
14.2.1 | ROM Pad and Crushing Circuit |
Ore mined from the mine can be classified into two ore types; Clean ore which contains < 5% basalt and Contaminated ore that contains > 5% Basalt. The ore is classified visual by ore spotters in the pit, using the fact clean ore is pegmatite (white in color) and basalt is (black in color), the ore spotter will estimate the percentage basalt and direct truck driver to the appropriate finger on the ROM.
Clean ore is placed in fingers on the Run of Mine ROM and crushed as direct feed into the plant or onto Fine Ore Stockpile FOS for direct feeding at a later stage. Contaminated stored on finger F19 on the ROM pad and crushed separately to be feed into the sorters (TOMRA’s) to remove the basalt which has similar SG characteristics to spodumene.
Basalt contaminated ore is reclaimed from the ROM F19 stockpile by front end loader put over a grizzly feeder to remove fines and into a single toggle jaw crusher. Due to the size requirement of the optical sorter the ore is split into three size fractions via triple deck screen 22mm to 75mm fraction, 14mm to 25mm fraction and -14mm which is not treated through the sorter due to being too small for optical sorting.
The split on the screens can very but is generally ~45% -14mm, 22% 14mm-25mm and 33% 25mm-75mm each size fraction is stacked into separate piles and fed into the sorter via loader or in case of -14mm stored for future treatment.
Each of the size ranges has setting optimized specific to treat size that size range, 14mm-25mm and 25mm-75mm, are fed into the TOMRA separately and using air canons to blow out basalt to upgrade the ore by shooting out 95% of the basalts. After successful treatment, the pegmatite is left clean with less than 3% basalt.
Contaminated ore treated trough the TOMRA is now clean ore <5% basalt and is batch processed through the crushing circuit while clean ore from the ROM being reintroduced before secondary cone and being crushed to -14mm in the cone crusher circuit becoming DMS plant feed.
Figure 14-1 – Mt Cattlin Process Flowsheet.
14.2.2 | Wet Plant Feed Classification |
Ore from the FOB is fed over a wet screen with the oversize, nominally +2.0 mm, dewatered and conveyed to storage bin (Bin 10) and then control fed to the DMS plant. Screen undersize (-2.0 mm) material is collected in a hopper and pumped to the Fines Circuit.
14.2.3 | Fines Circuit |
The fines plant receives approximately 15% of the total feed which is split into coarse (+710 µm to 2.0 mm) and fine (less than 710 µm) streams by Derrick Stack Sizer screens. The coarse stream is pumped directly to the coarse spiral concentrators. The fines material is pumped to deslime cyclones ahead of the fines spiral concentrators.
The concentrate from both coarse and fines spirals combines on a single Wilfley shaking table to separate the tantalite product further for bagging and dispatch. The resulting table concentrate averages approximately 5% Ta2O5 and is collected in a one tonne bulk bag.
The fine spirals waste material is transported via the thickener to tailings while the coarse spirals product material is transported to the ultrafine circuit for further spodumene recovery.
14.2.4 | Ultrafines Circuit |
The coarse spirals waste is pumped to the wet high intensity magnetic separator (WIMS). Magnetic material is sent to rejects, while non-magnetic material is fed to a reflux classifier for mica removal. The mica containing stream is pumped to the tailings thickener. The classifier underflow is dewatered by a screw feeder and fed to the ultrafine DMS (UFDMS) feed bin.
UFDMS feed is added to a ferrosilicon slurry and pumped through the UFDMS cyclone cluster, which produces an underflow of spodumene concentrate or sinks, as well as an overflow of reject material or floats.
Ferrosilicon is recovered from both the sinks and floats via sieve bends followed by magnetic separation. The density of the ferrosilicon slurry is maintained by pumping a portion of it through primary and secondary densifying cyclones. Fresh ferrosilicon is added when required to replace losses during processing.
The UFDMS floats are pumped to a dewatering screw and fed onto the rejects conveyor. The sinks are combined with the concentrate from the main DMS plant and report to final product. The UFDMS product is generally slightly lower grade, making up about 2-3% of the total recovery and 25-35% of the Li2O in the UFDMS feed.
14.2.5 | DMS Plant |
Plus 2.0 mm material from the wet plant feed preparation stage is split into 2.0 mm to 6.5 mm (fines) and 6.5 mm to 14 mm (coarse) size fractions by the DMS feed preparation screen. Each size fraction is added to a ferrosilicon slurry, then pumped through two separate stages of DMS cyclones to produce spodumene containing concentrate (sinks).
Ferrosilicon is recovered from both product and waste streams by screening and magnetic separation. It is then recycled to the DMS process. Fresh ferrosilicon is added as required, to make up for losses incurred in processing.
After separation from the ferrosilicon, the spodumene concentrate reports to the product stockpile.
Primary DMS float material is conveyed to the rejects load out bin. It is hauled by truck to the rejects stockpile. Secondary DMS float material is either directed to a stockpile bunker or sent to the re-liberation circuit to liberate spodumene particles that are locked in composites with gangue material.
14.2.6 | Re-liberation Circuit |
Secondary DMS plant float material is directed to a Vertical Shaft Impactor (VSI) crusher, followed by a dual layer screen. Plus 8 mm material is diverted to the secondary stockpile, while -8/+1.8 mm material is transferred back to the DMS feed preparation screen to be processed again through the DMS circuit. Minus 1.8 mm material is combined with the DMS plant effluent and recycled back to the Ultrafines circuit via the fines circuit.
14.2.7 | Product Handling |
Spodumene concentrate is stacked on a concrete pad adjacent to the plant area, prior to transport to the Esperance Port facility of the haulage contractor. The concentrate is weighed on site either by weighbridge or Loadrite weighing systems, with each mechanism being subject to routine calibration and certification. This defines the weight of the material hauled from site with the grade allocated to each parcel based on daily metallurgical accounting data. Once the material reaches the Esperance Port facility it is stored in one of three bins which are used to produce a sufficient stockpile of the correct grade required to meet customer needs.
The spodumene concentrate is sampled by an independent laboratory, Intertek, as an independent, accredited (ISO 17021 and ISO 17065) representative working on behalf of both Allkem and the concentrate buyer, before being moved in half-height sea containers for loading onto a dedicated compartment on a bulk material ship. Shipment size is generally in the range of 15,000 to 20,000 wmt.
An independent representative working on behalf of both Allkem, and the concentrate buyer is then responsible for defining the weight of the parcel through a draft survey, determining moisture content, and establishing the final sales grades. The final sample parcel is split into several portions that can be utilized for dispute resolution if required via another independent umpire laboratory.
Tantalite concentrate is stored in 1 m3 bulk bags and shipments conducted periodically in 50 tonne parcels. Allkem initiates the shipment process on an as required basis and conducts approximately 13 to 15 shipments per year at approximately 5% Ta2O5.
14.3 | Tailings and Utilities |
Tantalite circuit tailings, along with the -75 µm slimes, mica and plant spillage streams are directed to the tailings thickener for process water recovery. Thickener underflow is pumped to the Tailings Storage Facility. Since mid-2022, all tailings have been pumped to 2SE Pit, which has been repurposed as a Tailings Storage Facility.
It is anticipated that the 2SE pit will reach capacity as a IPTSF in 2024, by when it is expected to pump tailings to NE IPTSF.
Further discussion on tailings facilities is found in Section of 15. of this report.
14.4 | Process Water and Power |
Electrical power is provided by five (5) dedicated 1250 kVa Cummins diesel generators under a contract with Contract Power Australia.
Site process “make up” water is currently sourced from the empty Northeast Pit and pumped back to the process plant for treatment and distribution.
Table 14-1 – Water Usage and Power Consumption per Period.
Period | Water Usage (t) | Power Consumption (kWh) |
2020 | 819,624.50 | 14,984,163 |
2021 | 1,064,522 | 18,865,569 |
2022 | 844,037 | 15,792,497 |
14.5 | Metallurgical Accounting and Sample Processing |
Conveyor samples are taken by automatic crosscut belt samplers on the DMS feed (CV-06), final rejects (primary floats) and final products conveyors as the primary metal accounting points, with sample-cuts being collected at regular intervals throughout the day to produce a shift composite. The only exception to this is the final product for which four-hourly composite samples are produced on day shift to allow spot checks on grades using Xray diffraction (XRD).
Incoming plant feed from the fine ore reclaim system is measured by a weightometer installed on conveyor CV-06. The assay from the automatic sampling process ahead of the wet plant classifying screen is used as the basis to determine incoming metal content and to calculate total plant recovery.
Two hourly manual sample cuts of the tantalite concentrate stream are composited during filling a 1 m3 bulk bag with concentrate. Pulverized samples are sent off site to a commercial laboratory for analysis. After draining, the tantalite bulk bags are weighed and stored in the tantalite storage yard pending shipment.
Material reporting to the final spodumene concentrate stockpile is measured by a weightometer installed on CV-11 and CV-18 (UFDMS), before being sampled by an automatic sampler installed on CV-12 giving a combined concentrate grade for the twelve-hour shift. This process defines the grade and volume of concentrate added to the stockpile on a per-shift basis. An additional automatic sampler monitors the grade of the ultrafine DMS sinks ahead of CV18, which is used in the internal accounting and monitoring of the UFDMS circuit.
Spodumene concentrate removed for haulage is accounted for on a first in first out basis due to the typically small site stockpile volumes. If it becomes necessary to build larger concentrate stockpiles on site, a cumulative stockpile grade is used to define the grade of material as it is reclaimed.
Material reporting to coarse rejects is monitored by a weightometer installed on CV-14, and automatically sampled from CV-13. Manual sampling of the tailings thickener underflow is performed every two hours and the in-line density meter and flowmeter are used to calculate the tonnage reporting to the TSF.
Samples are processed in the onsite laboratory by drying in an industrial oven and rotary split, followed by pulverizing with a ring mill and assaying by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). Portions of each sample from the rotary splitter are stored for later analysis if required, with secondary analysis of concentrates by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) routinely performed off site by an independent laboratory. The ICP grade determinations are then used for building shipment and as final concentrate grades.
Metallurgical accounting data is compiled in an excel spreadsheet-based system that is managed by the site metallurgical team.
14.6 | Processing Workforce |
The operation is primarily supported by a fly-in fly-out workforce from Perth, with some of the workforce additionally on a residential basis in the regional towns of Ravensthorpe and Hopetoun.
The processing plant operations and maintenance workforce comprises nominally 90 personnel that perform the following roles:
● | Processing Manager |
● | Processing Superintendent |
● | Principal Metallurgist |
● | Senior Metallurgist (2) |
● | Maintenance Superintendent |
● | Maintenance Planner (3) |
● | Electrical Superintendent |
● | Electrical Supervisor |
● | Maintenance Supervisors (2) |
● | Maintenance staff (20) comprising fitters, electricians, boilermakers, and trade assistants in two rotations. |
● | Contract crushing plant operators (21) |
● | Process plant operators (28), including shift supervisors on four shifts of six operators. |
● | Process Coordinators (2) |
● | Laboratory personnel (5), including the Laboratory Supervisor. |
The processing plant operations staff are supported by on-site management, administration, and safety personnel.
14.7 | Processing Recommendations |
Crushing Circuit Recommissioning
The original Mt Cattlin crushing circuit was decommissioned when the plant went into care and maintenance during 2013 and was not recommissioned when the plant was restarted in 2016 due to the capital cost involved, relative to the Spodumene concentrate sales price at the time. Since that time, a permanent contact crushing contractor has been in place on site, and whilst giving generally good service, is relatively expensive. Given the mine life extension proposition of this Feasibility Study, a project to re-institute the fixed plant crushing circuit has been initiated, with a view to assessing the suitability of the current plant capacity and commissioning a facility that can serve Allkem’s life of mine needs.
Flotation Circuit
A test work program to investigate the potential of retreating tailings stockpiles to extract residual lithium is underway. This test work program has had encouraging results, and the potential business case deserves evaluation as the technical program concludes.
15. Infrastructure
The existing infrastructure and service facilities available and accessible to Mt Cattlin within WA are sufficient to maintain the ongoing operations of the mining and processing works. The two nearest population centers of Albany and Esperance both provide heavy industry support including construction, engineering, and manufacturing services. These resources will continue to be utilized throughout the life of the mine including planned shutdown maintenance personnel and lifting machinery, as well as providing ready access for emergency breakdown repairs.
The townships of Ravensthorpe and Hopetoun are also able to provide these services on a more limited scale since both towns also service the extensive Ravensthorpe Nickel Project.
Other facilities within Ravensthorpe include a hospital, police station, primary and secondary school, a large recreation facility, hotel, motel, and caravan park, in addition to a number of small business enterprises and a Tele center. A fully sealed airstrip capable of accepting commercial jet aircraft has been established south of the town near the Hopetoun Road.
15.1 | Infrastructure Layout |
The major site infrastructure both existing and planned is described in this Chapter and illustrated in Figure 15-1 .
Figure 15-1 – Key Infrastructure Items.
15.2 | Roads |
Transport from Perth to Mt Cattlin can be via either the Brookton Highway (540 km) or the Albany and South Coast Highways (690 km). These highways do not typically present any difficulties in carrying materials and equipment to site.
Concentrate transport occurs via the South Coast Highway to Esperance, over a distance of 187 km. A new access road from the Lake King Road was constructed to provide heavy vehicle access from the site for concentrate transport.
15.2.1 | Site Access Roads |
Access to site will be via a turn off from Floater Road seen to the north of WD2 in Figure 15-1, however to accommodate the expansion of Waste Dump #2 (WD2) modifications will be required to the site access route, and the expansion of the Stage 4 pit will require some internal road adjustments.
15.2.2 | Internal Site Roads |
Internal site roads to service the project are in place and are suitable to act as a haul road for mining trucks and mining related activities.
Internal site roads to service the Stage 4 pit and North-East (NE) Tailings facility will need to be realigned to accommodate the expanded Stage 4 pit. Access to the South-East (SE) Tailings facility and Waste Dump #1 (WD1) will be required to be rerouted around the Northern edge of the Stage 4 pit. These roads will be required to be suitable to act as haul roads for mining trucks and mining related activities.
15.3 | Concentrate Transport Route |
Spodumene concentrate from Mt Cattlin is trucked in bulk by Qube Logistics to Esperance Port and stored in a Qube facility with a capacity of 45,000 tonnes prior to ship loading.
Shipments to China are typically in bulk quantities of 15,000 tonnes or 30,000 tonnes per shipment. Ships are contracted on a spot basis as required to meet spodumene concentrate shipments sold to customers under existing off-take agreements. Typically, 180-200,000tpa of spodumene concentrate is shipped to China.
Monsoon Agencies Australia Pty Ltd has been appointed as shipper’s agent at the Esperance Port. The agent’s responsibility includes coordinating shipping activities with Mt Cattlin, the vessel’s owner, and the Esperance Port.
15.4 | Rail |
There are no railway lines in the vicinity of Mt Cattlin.
15.5 | Processing Plant |
Details pertaining to the processing plant and its operation are laid out in Chapter 14 Processing and Recovery Methods.
15.6 | Water Services |
Raw water is sourced from water bores located on the tenements and piped to either the raw water dam adjacent to the processing plant or the turkey’s nest for dust suppression in the mining operation. Process water supply is a combination of return water harvested from the SE IPTSF and “make up” water sourced from the “mined out” NE pit.
Site process make up water is currently sourced from the “mine out” North-East Pit and pumped back to the process plant for treatment and distribution, however an alternate water source will be required when the pit is converted to tailings storage. It is planned to access tailings return water from the NE IPTSF when in use via bore pumps, Allkem believes that these will be effective based on experience with current tailings behaviors and using rock back fill around the bores.
Drilling testing program to identify this source is currently underway, and there is an allowance in the cashflow model for the relocation of pumps and piping that will be required to make this adjustment.
Ongoing water availability and permitting is considered to be a key risk for the project once tailings deposition commences into the NE pit.
15.7 | Power Supply and Reticulation |
The feasibility study assumes continuing use of the existing installed 7 MW Diesel generation power plant as the basis for site power generation.
15.7.1 | Power Supply |
The power generation system at Mt Cattlin is owned and operated by an Independent Power Provider (IPP) under a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Pacific Energy (formerly Contract Power). The PPA was originally in place for 5 years from 2018 when the mine was recommissioned; and extended in June 2022 for a further 5 years under the same terms and conditions. The system
comprises of five (5) 1,250kVA Cummins generators, and it is a fit for purpose power solution that has met the site’s power generation requirements without issue throughout the contract period.
15.7.2 | Switchboard |
A single 415V switchboard is located adjacent to the generator area to regulate site power distribution.
15.7.3 | Powerline Reticulation |
Power is generated at 11kV and reticulated around the site. Four transformers (from 750kVA to 2,000kVA) are used to bring the voltage down to 415V for use. The site reticulation is aligned with current haul roads and will need to be reconfigured with the expansion of the Stage 4 pit.
15.7.4 | Solar Panels |
A small array of two axis solar panels is currently located outside the main administration area. At this time, they are not in use generating power for the site, however, they may potentially be recommissioned in the future.
15.8 | Mine Services and Administration |
The mine services facilities are separated between the administration area located at the entrance to the site, and the mining and workshop areas. The mining and heavy vehicle areas are segregated from the general workshop area for personnel and equipment safety.
It is anticipated that some modifications to the mine services areas may be required should there be a change in the mine services contractor as a result of the current tender process.
15.8.1 | Mining and Heavy Vehicles |
Within the mining and heavy vehicle component of the mine services area there is space allocated for the following:
● | Space and concrete pad for the Mining Contractor’s heavy vehicle workshop |
● | Space and concrete pad for the Mining Contractor’s light vehicle workshop |
● | Mining Contractor’s heavy vehicle workshop office |
● | Mining Contractor’s heavy vehicle workshop ablutions |
● | Space and concrete pad for the Mining Contractor’s truck tire replacement facility. |
15.8.2 | Mine Administration Building |
The main administration office is a 60 m long by 10 m wide permanent structure. It has offices for Allkem staff as well as meeting rooms, lunchroom, and toilet facilities.
15.8.3 | Other Ancillary Buildings |
Additional facilities on site include:
● | Stores building |
● | Plant workshop |
● | Metallurgical laboratory. |
15.9 | Hydrocarbons |
15.9.1 | Diesel Off-Loading |
The diesel facility consists of a skid equipped with duty/standby pumps, filtration, coalescing filter, isolation valves, and a flow meter to measure fuel deliveries. The off-loading pumps are high flow and self-priming to minimize fuel tanker off-loading times.
15.9.2 | Storage and Reticulation |
Diesel is stored in four (4) 110 kL self-bunded diesel tanks, which will be sufficient to support the site in the foreseeable future. The diesel storage facility is located to the North of the Mine Contractor’s workshop and office area. The tanks are connected by a common manifold to balance the tanks.
15.10 | Explosives Storage |
The license for bulk explosive and emulsion supply and storage is provided by external contractor Johnex Explosives. The high explosive magazine license and inventory is owned and managed by Allkem.
15.11 | Light Vehicles |
Process Plant light vehicles and vehicles to transfer office staff to and from their accommodation are owned by Allkem.
15.12 | Security |
Due to the site’s location and natural access restrictions, the perimeter security fencing is only installed where necessary around the site’s boundary. Site vehicle access is coordinated via the gatehouse which is accessed from a turnoff on the newly upgraded Floater Road.
15.13 | Technology and Communications |
Allkem have implemented a third-party ERP system, to accommodate the core financial requirements of the Company.
The Mt Cattlin site uses a terrestrial microwave internet solution with satellite backup, thus the risk of losing access to an off-site email system is considered low.
The plant is deployed with various SCADA systems with monitoring and reporting functions.
The corporate network is extended securely to connect to the control system, allowing for the efficient access of data stored by the SCADA system on its Historian server and the automated integration of this data into various reporting systems.
The Mt Cattlin site currently has a terrestrial internet connection that services the site suitably. In the unlikely event that this connection experiences an issue, a National Broadband Network (NBN) satellite service remains in place allowing continued access to email and VoIP services.
A local third-party tower provides cell phone coverage of the site.
Under normal circumstances, communications off-site happen via the cell phone network and the deployed suite of collaboration and communication tools. These rely on the described internet links and a third-party cell phone network. As these communications could be affected by a common issue, such as a power outage to the area or an unforeseen weather event satellite phones provide alternative communications capability. Several satellite phones are distributed across site, to be used for emergency communications.
15.14 | Waste Management |
15.14.1 | Sewage |
Site sewage is pumped to septic tanks on site which are pumped out by a contractor on a regular basis for disposal.
15.14.2 | Solid Waste |
Solid waste is sorted on site and segregated into recycling and landfill bins. These bins are collected on a schedule by a contractor and taken to the local landfill facility.
15.15 | Topsoil Stockpiles for Rehabilitation |
Vegetation, topsoil, and overburden is stripped and stockpiled for future reclamation use.
Topsoil stockpiles will be paddock dumped and be approximately 2 m in height.
All topsoil stockpiles will be located away or protected from stormwater flows, minimizing potential losses via erosion.
15.16 | Tailings Storage Facilities |
Since commencement of operations three tailings storage facilities have been used, the first TSF1 was an above ground facility located northwest of the plant site. Tailings were then deposited into an in-pit tailings facility in the mined-out SW pit, named 2SWIPTSF until early 2022 when tailings deposition commenced into the current facility in the mined-out SE pit, called 2SEIPTSF. The location of the tailings storage facilities are shown in Figure 15-2.
Figure 15-2 – Tailings Storage Facilities.
15.16.1 | Above Ground Tailings Facility |
Until 2019, tailings from the process plant reported to a regulated tailings storage facility located 500 m north of the processing plant. The original design comprised an above ground storage facility formed by a primary embankment on three sides and a natural hillside slope forming the fourth side. The original design storage capacity, based on the planned maximum design crest was 2 million m3 and covered a surface area of approximately 17 Ha. The maximum embankment height was 13 m for the starter embankment and 18 m for the final crest height. Adjustments made to the original 2009 design included a change from one large cell to two smaller cells which reduced the active pond area and simplified operating requirements.
Use of the original above ground facility was discontinued in 2019 and the site has been partly rehabilitated (Figure 15-3).
Investigations are underway to determine the viability for reprocessing of this tailings material. Recent modifications to the process plant configuration are likely to allow the pre-2018 tailings to be re-processed in order to recover residual spodumene.
Figure 15-3 – Aerial image of the currently decommissioned TSF as of March 2021.
15.16.2 | Stage 2 SW Pit In Pit Tailings Facility |
After mid-2019, tailings were pumped to the completed Stage 2 SW Pit which was repurposed as a Tailings Storage Facility Figure 15-4. Tailings were pumped to the 2SW Pit until 2022 when tailings were redirected to the 2 SE Pit.
Figure 15-4 – Aerial image of the existing in-pit tailings storage in March 2021.
The Stage 4 pit expansion requires relocation of the adjacent SW IPTSF material. Allkem has identified dry stacking the excavated tailings onto the top of TSF1 and spreading the material with a dozer as the preferred option. Figure 15-5 illustrates the difference between current surface elevations of TSF1 as Area 1 (280 m RL) and Area 2 (275.3 m RL). This differential will accommodate part of the estimated SW IPTSF tailings volume of 739,000 m3, with a final TSF1 surface elevation of 288 m RL required to accommodate the full relocation of SW IPTSF material as per Table 15-1.
Figure 15-5 – TSF1 Surface RL Profile.
Table 15-1 – SW IPTSF Deposition Sequence.
Stage | Crest Level (m RL) | Volume Relocated (m3) |
1 | 280 | 180,000 |
2/3 | 288 | 565,000 |
15.16.3 | Current Tailings Storage Facility 2 SE Pit In Pit Tailings Storage Facility |
Since early 2022, tailings have been deposited into the 2 SE Pit IPTSF.
The TSF is an in-pit (below ground) facility, formed by construction of rockfill embankment to partition the storage void from the adjoining worked out 2NE pit area. The 2SE IPTSF embankment was constructed from mine waste rock backfill from nearby active pit workings. Tailings is discharged in an easterly direction from the backfilled embankment toward the intact rock pit wall, which results in a decant pond forming against the pit wall as can be seen in Figure 15-6.
The embankment along the northern and western side of the pit is constructed to a maximum crest elevation of 240 m RL using fresh mine waste rock. The lowest crest elevation is 230 m RL at the south-eastern corner, with the maximum storage capacity defined by minimum freeboard 0.5 m below that.
The storage volume, capacity and life were estimated based on an adopted dry density of 1.5 t/m3, varying tailings beach slope and a tailings production rate of 420,500 tpa. The maximum storage capacity is approximately 790,000 m3, or 1.2 Mt, and it is forecast to provide operational tailings capacity until mid-2024, depending on the management of the decant pond (i.e., an excess of stored water will result in less solids storage capacity, and an earlier exhaustion of freeboard).
Figure 15-6 – SE IPTSF Decant Pond and Return Water System (October 2022).
The tailings slurry is deposited into the 2SE Pit TSF at 40-50% solids through a single spigot, open pipe discharge. Based on the performance of previous tailings discharge at the site, an initial steep beach angle of up to about 7° is expected, flattening with distance from the discharge point to approximately 1% after 20 m and 0.5% beyond 100 m (Coffey 2021).
15.16.4 | Future Tailings Storage Facility |
The solids storage capacity of the 2SE facility is calculated to be reached in mid-2024. Depending upon the volume of decant water held at the time, the practical capacity may be reached before that. The next planned tailings deposition location is another similarly styled IPTSF in an area of the worked out 2NE pit, designated as the NE Void. This new NE IPTSF is planned to be designed, permitted, constructed, and operationally ready, with sufficient contingency time, to accept tailings when the SE facility is at capacity.
With an active volume of 1.8 Mm3, the NE IPTSF will accommodate approximately 7-years of plant production and support continuous operation until 2031 assuming a continued annual tailings production rate of 450 kt, and an improved in-situ density of 1.7 t/m3. This storage potential would last well past the Stage 4 life of mine, predicted to be approximately 2028.
16. Market Studies and Contracts
16.1 | Overview of the Lithium Industry |
Lithium is the lightest and least dense solid element in the periodic table, with a standard atomic weight of 6.94. Lithium is a soft silvery-grey metal with good heat and electric conductivity in its metallic form. Although the least reactive of the alkali metals, lithium reacts readily with air, burning with a white flame at temperatures above 200°C and room temperature, forming a red-purple coating of lithium nitride.
In water, metallic lithium reacts to form lithium hydroxide and hydrogen. As a result of its reactive properties, lithium does not occur naturally in its pure elemental metallic form, instead occurring within minerals and salts.
The crustal abundance of lithium is calculated to be 0.002% (20 parts per million (ppm)), making it the twenty-third most abundant crustal element. Typical values of lithium in the main rock types are 1 ppm to 35 ppm in igneous rocks, 8 ppm in carbonate rocks and 70 ppm in shales and clays. Lithium concentration in seawater is significantly less than the crustal abundance, ranging between 0.14 ppm and 0.25 ppm.
16.2 | Sources of Lithium |
There are five naturally occurring sources of lithium, of which the most developed are lithium pegmatites and continental lithium brines. Other sources of lithium include oilfield brines, geothermal brines, and clays.
16.2.1 | Lithium Minerals |
Spodumene is the most mined mineral for lithium, with historical and active deposits exploited in China, Australia, Brazil, the USA, and Russia. The high lithium content of spodumene (approximately 8% lithia), its well-defined extraction process, and spodumene typically occurring in more extensive pegmatite deposits make it an essential mineral in the lithium industry.
Lepidolite is a monoclinic mica group mineral typically associated with granite pegmatites, containing approximately 7% lithia. Historically, lepidolite was the most widely extracted mineral for lithium, however, its significant fluorine content made it unattractive compared to other lithium-bearing silicates. Lepidolite mineral concentrates are mainly produced in China and Portugal for direct use or conversion to lithium compounds in the ceramics industry.
Petalite contains comparatively less lithium than lepidolite and spodumene, with approximately 4.5% lithia. Like the spodumene and lepidolite, petalite occurs associated with granite pegmatites. It is extracted for processing into downstream lithium products or for direct use in the glass and ceramics industry.
16.2.2 | Lithium Clays |
Lithium clays are formed by the breakdown of lithium-enriched igneous rock, which may also be enriched further by hydrothermal or metasomatic alteration. The most significant lithium clays are members of the smectite group, particularly the lithium-magnesium-sodium end member hectorite. Hectorite ores typically contain 0.24% to 0.53% lithium concentrations and form numerous deposits in the USA and northern Mexico. As well as having the potential to be processed into downstream lithium compounds, hectorite is also used directly in aggregate coatings, vitreous enamels, aerosols, adhesives, emulsion paints and grouts. Other lithium-bearing members of the smectite group are salitolite and swinefordite.
16.2.3 | Lithium Brines |
Lithium-enriched brines occur in three primary environments: evaporative saline lakes and salars, geothermal and oilfield brines. Evaporative saline lakes and salars are formed as lithium-bearing lithologies, which are weathered by meteoric waters forming a diluted lithium solution. The diluted lithium solutions percolate or flow into lakes and basin environments which can be enclosed or have an outflow. If lakes and basins form in locations where the evaporation rate is more significant than water input, lithium and other solutes are concentrated in the solution, as water is removed via evaporation. Concentrated solutions (“saline brines”) can be retained subterraneously within porous sediments and evaporites or in surface lakes, accumulating over time to form large saline brine deposits.
The chemistry of saline brines is unique to each deposit, with brines changing dramatically in composition within the same salar. The overall brine composition is crucial in determining a processing method to extract lithium, as other soluble ions such as magnesium, sodium, and potassium must be removed during processing. Brines with a high lithium concentration and low lithium-magnesium and lithium-potassium ratios are considered the most economical to process. Brines with lower lithium contents can be exploited economically if evaporation costs or impurities are low. Lithium concentrations at the Salar de Atacama in Chile and Salar de Hombre Muerto in Argentina are higher than most other locations. However, the Zabuye Salt Lake in China has a more favourable lithium-magnesium ratio.
16.3 | Lithium Industry Supply Chain |
Figure 16-1 below shows a schematic overview of material flow through the lithium industry supply chain in 2021. Raw material sources in blue and brown represent the source of refined production and technical-grade mineral products consumed directly in industrial applications. Refined lithium products are distributed into various compounds displayed in green. Refined products may be processed further into specialty lithium products, such as butyllithium or lithium metal, displayed
in grey. Demand from major end-use applications is shown in orange, with the relevant end-use sectors in yellow.
Figure 16-1 – Lithium Industry Flowchart (Wood Mackenzie).
16.4 | Global Demand for Lithium |
Lithium has traditionally been used for applications such as ceramic glazes and porcelain enamels, glass ceramics for high-temperature applications, lubricating greases, and as a catalyst for polymer production. Between 2020 and 2022, demand in these sectors rose steadily by approximately a 4% compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”). Growth in these applications is highly correlated to industrial activity and macroeconomic growth. Wood Mackenzie forecasts that the combined growth of lithium demand from industrial markets will likely be maintained at approximately 2% annually from 2023 to 2050 (Figure 16-2).
Rechargeable batteries represent the dominant application of lithium today, representing more than 80% of global lithium demand in 2022. Within the rechargeable battery segment, 58% was attributed to automotive applications, which has grown at 69% annually since 2020. This segment is expected to drive lithium demand growth in future. To illustrate, Wood Mackenzie forecasts total lithium demand will grow at 11% CAGR during 2023 and 2033: of this, lithium demand attributable to the auto sector is forecast to increase at 13% CAGR, whilst all other applications are forecast to grow at 7% CAGR. As the market matures, growth is forecast to slow in the following two decades (Figure 16-2).
Figure 16-2 – Global Demand for Lithium by End Use, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mackenzie).
Lithium is produced in various chemical compositions, which in turn serve as precursors in manufacturing its end-use products such as rechargeable batteries, polymers, ceramics, and others. For rechargeable batteries, the cathode, an essential component of each battery cell, is the largest consumer of lithium across the battery supply chain. The evolution in cathode chemistries determines demand profiles for lithium carbonate and hydroxide. The automotive industry mainly uses nickel-cobalt-manganese oxide (“NCM”) and nickel-cobalt-aluminum oxide (“NCA”) cathodes, often grouped as “high nickel” and lithium-iron-phosphate (“LFP”) cathodes. High nickel cathodes consume lithium in hydroxide form and generally have a higher lithium intensity. LFP cathodes mainly consume lithium in carbonate form, with lower lithium content. LFP cathodes are predominantly manufactured in China.
Lithium in the form of lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate collectively accounted for 90% of refined lithium demand in 2022. These two forms are expected to remain important sources of lithium in the foreseeable future, reflecting the share of the rechargeable battery market in the overall lithium market (Figure 16-3). The remaining forms of lithium include technical grade mineral concentrate (mainly spodumene, petalite and lepidolite) used in industrial applications accounting for 7% of 2022 demand, and other specialty lithium metal used in industrial and niche applications.
Figure 16-3 – Global Demand for Lithium by Product, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mackenzie).
Lithium products are classified as battery-grade (“BG”) for use in rechargeable battery applications and technical-grade (“TG”), which is primarily used in industrial applications. TG lithium carbonate can also be processed and upgraded to higher-purity carbonate or hydroxide products.
Lithium hydroxide is expected to experience exponential growth on the back of high-nickel Li-ion batteries. Demand for BG lithium hydroxide is expected to grow at 10% CAGR from 2023 to 2033 to reach 1,133 kt LCE in 2033, up from 450 kt LCE in 2023 (Figure 16-3). Wood Mackenzie predicts lithium hydroxide to be the most significant product by demand volume in the near term. However, the growth of LFP demand beyond China may see BG lithium carbonate reclaim its dominance.
Wood Mackenzie forecasts that LFP cathodes will increase its share of the cathode market from 28% in 2022 to 43% by 2033. This drives growth in lithium carbonate demand. Wood Mackenzie predicts lithium carbonate demand will grow at 14% CAGR between 2023 and 2033, slowing as the market matures (Figure 16-3).
16.5 | Global Supply of Lithium |
The world’s lithium is supplied by primary production from hard rock mineral mines (spodumene, lepidolite and petalite), continental lithium brines, and reprocessing (upgrading) of lithium carbonates.
Lithium recycling currently contributes a small proportion of the global supply (approximately 2% in 2022). However, as the industry matures and recycling technology develops, supply from recycling will play an increasing role in global supply, expected to grow up to 36% of the global supply by 2050 (Figure 16-4).
Figure 16-4 – Refined Lithium Production by Raw Material Source, 2023 – 2050 (kt LCE).
Mineral concentrates are the world’s largest source of lithium. In 2022, refined lithium production sourced nearly half of mineral concentrate production. Spodumene is the dominant form of mineral concentrate, followed by lepidolite, representing 82% and 17% of total mined production in 2022,
respectively. Mineral concentrates may be divided into two categories: chemical and technical. The chemical-grade mineral concentrate is exclusively used in the conversion process to produce refined lithium chemicals, such as carbonate and hydroxide, by conversion facilities. The technical-grade mineral concentrate is used directly in ceramic, glass, and metallurgical applications.
Lithium supply from mineral concentrate is supplemented by production from brine resources, where expansions and new projects in South America will add significant supply to the market. In 2022, 38% of refined lithium production was sourced from brine. Wood Mackenzie forecasts that brine-based refined lithium production will grow 8% CAGR between 2023 and 2033. Brine-based share is expected to fall to 27%, losing its share to mineral concentrates and recycling sources by 2033.
The total refined production of the final lithium product in 2022 is estimated at 701kt LCE. Wood Mackenzie forecast this to increase at a rate of 12% per annum between 2023 and 2033. As primary sources of lithium decline, recycling is expected to increase to meet growing demand (Figure 16-5).
Figure 16-5 – Refined production by Final Product, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mckenzie).
The top five operators are estimated to account for 47% of the total refined lithium output in 2023. Over the next decade, the share of the top five producers is forecast to decrease to 28% due to new entrants in the market. The top five producers will, however, remain vital in the market as they possess the know-how to produce high-quality products. The large-scale production of these companies will remain attractive to buyers (Figure 16-6).
Figure 16-6 – Top 5 Global Lithium Producers of Refined Lithium, 2023 and 2033 (%) – (Wood Mackenzie).
16.6 | Market Balance |
The lithium market balance has shown high volatility in recent years. A supply deficit resulted from historical underinvestment relative to solid demand growth in electric vehicles (“EV”). The price rise over the last few years has incentivized investment in additional supply. However, the ability of supply to meet demand remains to be determined, given the persistence of delays and cost increases across both brownfield and greenfield developments.
Wood Mackenzie predicts the market will remain in deficit for battery-grade lithium chemicals in 2024. In 2025, battery-grade chemicals are expected to move into a fragile surplus before falling into a sustained deficit in 2033 and beyond. Notably, technical-grade lithium chemicals may be reprocessed into battery-grade to reduce the deficit. However, the capacity and ability to do so still need to be determined.
16.7 | Lithium Prices |
Lithium spot prices have experienced considerable volatility in recent months. Prices peaked in 2022, with battery-grade products reaching US$80,000 per tonne. However, spot prices fell significantly during the first quarter of 2023 before stabilizing in the second quarter of 2023. A combination of factors explains the price movements, including the plateauing EV sales, slowdown of cathode production in China, and destocking through the supply chain, partially attributed to seasonal maintenance activities and national holidays.
Contract prices have traditionally been agreed upon on a negotiated basis between the customer and supplier. However, in recent years there has been an increasing trend towards linking contract
prices to those published by a rising number of price reporting agencies. As such, contracted prices have tended to follow spot pricing trends, albeit with a lag.
16.7.1 | Lithium Carbonate |
Continued demand growth for LFP cathode batteries will ensure strong demand growth for battery-grade lithium carbonate. This demand is expected to be met predominantly by supply from brine projects. The robust pricing environment provides incentive for numerous projects to come online steadily over the coming years. Wood Mackenzie forecasts prices to decline as supply increases. Wood Mackenzie however forecasts a sustained deficit in battery-grade lithium chemicals to commence in 2031. Over the longer term, Wood Mackenzie expects prices to settle between US$26,000 per tonne and US$31,000 per tonne (in real US$ 2023 terms) (Figure 16-7).
Figure 16-7 – Lithium Carbonate Price Outlook, 2023 – 2050.
Notably, the market for battery-grade carbonates is more profound, and the spot market is more liquid than hydroxide due to the size and experience of its primary market in China. In addition, battery-grade carbonates are used in a broader variety of batteries beyond the EV end-use. Technical-grade lithium carbonate demand for industrial applications is forecast to grow in line with economic growth. However, technical-grade lithium carbonate lends itself well to reprocessing into battery-grade lithium chemicals (carbonate or hydroxide). The ability to reprocess the product into battery-grade lithium chemicals will ensure that prices will be linked to the prices of battery-grade lithium chemicals.
16.7.2 | Lithium Hydroxide |
The market for battery-grade lithium hydroxide is currently small and relatively illiquid compared to the carbonate market. Growth in high nickel cathode chemistries supports a strong demand outlook. Most battery-grade hydroxide is sold under long-term contracts currently, which is expected to continue. However, contract prices are expected to be linked to spot prices and,
therefore, likely to follow spot price trends, albeit with a lag. Over the longer term, Wood Mackenzie expects hydroxide prices to settle between US$25,000 per tonne and US$35,000 per tonne (real US$ 2023 terms) (Figure 16-8).
Figure 16-8 – Lithium Hydroxide Price Outlook, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mackenzie).
16.7.3 | Chemical Grade Spodumene Concentrate |
In 2022, demand from converters showed strong growth resulting in improved prices. After years of underinvestment, new capacity has been motivated, and brownfield and greenfield projects are underway. Notably, these incremental volumes are observed to be at a higher cost and greater difficulty, raising the pricing hurdles required to maintain supply and extending timelines for delivery.
Wood Mackenzie forecasts a short period of supply volatility in the years to 2030, moving from surplus to deficit and oversupply before entering a sustained deficit beyond 2031. Reflecting this dynamic, prices are expected to align with market imbalances. Wood Mackenzie forecasts a long-term price between US$2,000 per tonne and US$3,000 per tonne (real US$ 2023 terms) (Figure 16-9).
Figure 16-9 – Chemical-grade Spodumene Price Outlook, 2023 – 2050 (Wood Mackenzie).
16.8 | Mt Cattlin Offtake |
Allkem sells Mt Cattlin’s spodumene concentrate through offtake agreements, mainly to Chinese converters. Offtake agreements have pricing conditions reflecting spodumene market prices.
16.9 | Disclaimer |
Information provided to Mining Plus by Allkem pertaining to forward looking forecasts and market demand was sourced by Wood Mackenzie, with the mandatory disclaimer:
“The data and information provided by Wood Mackenzie should not be interpreted as advice and you should not rely on it for any purpose. You may not copy or use this data and information except as expressly permitted by Wood Mackenzie in writing.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Wood Mackenzie accepts no responsibility for your use of this data and information except as specified in a written agreement you have entered into with Wood Mackenzie for the provision of such of such data and information.”
17. ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, SOCIAL OR
COMMUNITY IMPACTS
17.1 | Results of Environmental Studies |
Prior to and during operations, numerous comprehensive baseline environmental studies have been conducted by external technical experts to support project permitting. These studies covered factors such as:
● | Flora and Vegetation |
● | Terrestrial Fauna |
● | Subterranean Fauna |
● | Hydrogeology |
● | Hydrology |
● | Soils |
● | Mine Waste Characterization |
● | Aboriginal Heritage |
● | European Heritage |
Excepting the additional baseline studies required in the area of waste dump 4, should it be needed, all key studies required to enable the continuation of operations for the remainder of the life of mine have been completed and Mt Cattlin does not have any major environmental constraints that it believes would prevent permitting the ongoing development and mining.
17.1.1 | Climate |
The Project is situated within an area classified as a Mediterranean climate featuring moist, mild winters and hot, dry summers. The closest weather station is located at Ravensthorpe (Site number: 010633), approximately 2 km south of the Project (Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) 2019).
Climatic statistics recorded and averaged from 1901–2019 for rainfall and 1962–2019 for temperature at the Ravensthorpe weather station (BoM 2019) are summarized below:
● | Mean annual maximum temperature (°C): 22.8, with a high of 29.0 recorded in January. |
● | Mean annual temperature (°C): 10.5, with a low of 6.7 recorded in August. |
● | Average annual rainfall (mm): 429.6 with most rainfall occurring between May–October |
● | Average annual days with z 1 mm of rainfall: 74.7. |
The average wind speeds at Ravensthorpe vary throughout the year from 10.2–14.0 km/h in the morning to 12.2–16.3 km/h in the afternoon (BoM 2019).
17.1.2 | Landscape |
The Project area is in the Fitzgerald Interim Biogeographic Regionalization for Australia (IBRA) subregion (ESP1) of the Esperance Plains IBRA bioregion, which totals over one million hectares. The subregion is characterized by ‘myrtaceous and proteaceous scrub and mallee heaths on sandplain overlying Eocene sediments; and herb fields and heaths on abrupt granite tors and quartzite ranges that rise from the plain. Eucalypt woodlands occur in gullies and on alluvial foot-slopes.
The Fitzgerald sub-region has variable relief, comprising subdued relief on the sandplains of the coastal region, punctuated with metamorphosed granite and quartzite ranges both inland and on the coastal plain. It lies mainly on the Bremer Sedimentary Basin and the eastern and western sections of the ESP1 subregion within the Albany-Fraser Orogen of the Yilgarn Craton. It has extensive western plains over an Eocene marine sediment basement with small areas of outcropping gneiss. Archaean greenstones (primarily basaltic rocks) and sand sheets with varying levels of lateralization with gravelly soils also occur.
The region is dominated by duplex soils and deep and shallow sands on the plains and dissected areas and by shallow sandy soils on the mountain ranges (Comer et al 2001). Several rivers flow south to the coast including the Jerdacuttup River which includes Cattlin Creek as a western sub catchment.
The major towns occurring throughout the region include Ravensthorpe, Hopetoun, Jerramungup, and Bremer Bay.
17.1.3 | Materials Characteristics |
17.1.3.1 | Soils Characteristics |
The majority of the land within the proposed disturbance envelope is within the existing disturbed mine footprint. The exception to this is the WD2 footprint expansion area, which is located within land historically cleared for agriculture. Productive soils will be stripped and utilized in rehabilitation of the waste dumps.
Keith Lindbeck and Associates (KLA) conducted two rounds of soil assessment in 2008 and again in 2012 (Appendix 2 in Reg ID 73856). KLA confirmed that the surface horizons as well as the subsoils of the agricultural areas at the Mt Cattlin mine area are suitable for rehabilitation purposes.
17.1.3.2 | Waste Rock Characteristics |
There are no changes to the geochemical or physical properties of the waste rock associated with the Project.
The Stage 4 Open Pit expansion and the characteristics of the waste are well known. Waste rock characteristics at the Mt Cattlin Operation have been described in previously approved Mining Proposal applications (e.g., Reg ID 22377, 69112, 73856). Previous Mining Proposals have found that the geology at the Mt Cattlin operations is chemically benign and physically stable.
17.1.3.2.1 | Geochemical Characterization |
Additional internal analysis in December 2022 of drilling samples from the Stage 4 Open Pit expansion area confirmed the benign nature of the waste rock. This data combined with the Stage 3 Pit assays and sampling points shown in Figure 17-1 and Figure 17-2.
Figure 17-3 depicts the homogeneous extension of the lithologies from the current Stage 3 Open Pit to the proposed Stage 4 Open Pit.
Of 18,651 m of waste rock assayed, 21 m contained sulfides >0.3% and levels of other metals are low.
There have been four (4) cases at Mt Cattlin since 2016 where investigations of suspected asbestiform materials or fibrous minerals have been undertaken. All investigations returned negative results for the presence of potentially harmful asbestiform or fibrous material.
It is considered that no significant or additional fibrous material risks are posed by the proposed mine expansion at Mt Cattlin. Continuing vigilance and ongoing investigation and analysis of any suspected fibrous materials will be undertaken whenever such materials are encountered. These measures will inform appropriate operational risk assessments and will identify whether additional controls or management are required.
Figure 17-1 – Lithology Sampling (Stage 3 and Stage 4 Pit).
Figure 17-2 – Lithology Sampling Cross Section.
Figure 17-3 – Stage 3 to Stage 4 Lithological Extension.
17.1.3.3 | Tailings Characterization |
Granitic pegmatites are mineralogically simple igneous rock consisting of approximately 65% feldspar, 25% quartz, 5 to 10% mica and proximally 5% of accessory minerals, which include lithium bearing spodumene (Li2O.Al2O3.4SiO2) and tantalite (Ta2O5). These proportions typically result in large volumes of quartz and feldspar reject material requiring disposal as tailings waste material post processing.
17.1.4 | Biodiversity |
17.1.4.1 | Flora and Vegetation. |
The majority of the land within the proposed Disturbance Envelope is within an already disturbed mine footprint. The WD2 and WD3 expansion area is located within land historically cleared for agriculture.
As a result, most of the proposed disturbance envelope is devoid of any remnant vegetation. A small corridor of vegetation remains on the eastern boundary of the WD2 expansion area, within M74/244.The vegetation corridor represents approximately 1.3 ha, of which less than 0.05 ha will require disturbance to allow for an access road. Any vegetation clearance is authorized under CPS3045/5.
A small number of isolated trees and shrubs are in the paddock that will accommodate the WD2 expansion (Figure 17-4).
There are no Threatened Flora, Threatened Ecological Communities or Priority Ecological Communities recorded in the vicinity of the Project area. One priority flora species, Acacia bifaria (P3), has been recorded within adjacent vegetation east of the Project and considerable numbers of this species have been established and recorded in rehabilitated areas along the top banks of the creek diversion. No priority flora has been recorded within the Project area.
If required the waste dump 4 area would require additional baseline studies be undertaken and clearing additional land, not previously cleared.
Figure 17-4 – Photograph of Isolated Paddock Trees and Shrubs, WD2 Expansion Area (March 2023).
17.1.4.2 | Fauna |
The Project area occurs within the exiting disturbed mine footprint and on cleared agricultural land devoid of vegetation resulting in a depauperate fauna assemblage. No threatened fauna species have ever been recorded in any surveys of the Project area and its surrounds.
Areas further to the north and east of the Project area provide valuable remnant habitat, within a broader landscape that has largely been denuded of vegetation for agricultural purposes, including the Project area. A survey by Ninox (2018) of the habitat to the north and east of the Project area (outside the cleared areas of the Project area), described nearby areas as a mosaic of mallee form woodlands of Eucalyptus species over variable shrub and ground cover on the slopes and crests.
Further baseline surveys would be required if waste dumping in the Waste Dump 4 area.
Bennelongia Environmental Consultants conducted a Level 1 Subterranean Fauna survey in 2018. Bennelongia concluded that, despite the presence of suitable habitat for stygofauna in the nearby
vicinity of Cattlin Creek, the community appears to have only low to moderate richness and that it is unlikely that any species would be restricted to the area of the pit and creek diversion development with the same habitat widespread in the Ravensthorpe area.
Two species of troglofaunal were collected as by-catch during stygofauna sampling. Habitat characterization suggested there is only low-quality habitat, at best, for roglofaunal. The two species collected show that some troglofaunal habitat is present, but the same habitat is widespread in the Ravensthorpe area. While there is no information on the likely ranges of roglofaunal species in the southwest, based on the existence of similar habitat outside the mine pits and the small size of the proposed mine pit expansion, it is unlikely any species would be restricted to the area of pit expansion.
17.1.5 | Hydrology |
17.1.5.1 |
Surface Water |
The main surface water aspect associated with this Project is the Cattlin Creek which is highly saline, only flows after significant rainfall events and receives most of its runoff from agricultural land, built infrastructure (roads) and vegetated, unallocated Crown Land.
17.1.5.2 | Ground Water |
The main aquifers are fractures or joints within weathered and fresh volcanic rocks. Cattlin Creek appears to follow zones of weakness in the bedrock that are locally permeable. Open joints and fractures are mostly above 120 m depth, but some have been intersected down to 270 m depth. A drilling program to identify additional potential aquifers to service the projects requirements is underway.
17.1.6 | Environmental Threats |
Possible environmental threats to the environment from the proposed activities are described in the following Sections.
17.1.6.1 | Dust Emissions |
Mining activities can generate dust to varying degrees during all stages of the mine life and these events are usually visible and readily identifiable. The following activities have been included in this assessment:
● | Disturbance of vegetation and topsoil |
● | Areas cleared of vegetation, exacerbating natural wind erosion |
● | Surface disturbance during construction activities |
● | Drilling and blasting programs |
● | Excavation and movement of topsoil, waste rock and ore |
● | Vehicle movements (and travel speeds) along unsealed access and haul roads |
● | Closure and rehabilitation activities including contouring and ripping of landforms |
● | Crushing and screening operations. |
Most of any airborne particulates from the site are likely to be visible dust, with potential for fine particulate (PM10) material.
Galaxy developed an Airborne Material Management Plan (GLA-MTC-AMMP-Rev2.3-0720) (Galaxy, 2020) to address the requirements for nuisance dust management and minimize potential impacts to Galaxy site personnel, nearby receptors, and the environment.
Data collection, monitoring and reporting requirements are outlined in this Plan in accordance with any Conditions attached to Prescribed Premises License 8469/2010/02 and relevant Australian Standards.
17.1.6.2 | Noise Emissions |
Residential premises to the south of the mine within the Ravensthorpe Town site are sensitive to noise emissions from the Mt Cattlin Project.
A Condition of Prescribed Premise License L8469/2010/1 (amended 7/7/2011) for the Galaxy Ravensthorpe lithium mining and processing operation was the development and implementation of an Operational Noise Management Plan (ONMP) (02-MTC-ENV-PLA-0201) (Galaxy 2019). The License condition required that the ONMP shall include but not be limited to:
● | An environmental risk assessment of potential sources of noise and possible impacts |
● | Details of all management measures taken on site to negate the risks identified. |
● | A noise monitoring program including monitoring locations, frequency, methodology, reporting and responsibilities. |
● | Protocols for noise incident/complaint response and notification procedures. |
Noise risk management and control measures are outlined in the ONMP as follows:
Noise management measures:
● | Consideration of wind conditions in daily planning of operations, with respect to likely noise propagation to key receptors if noise modelling or monitoring indicates potential noise emissions close to exceedance. |
● | Restriction of mining or dumping activities in specific areas to occur only in favourable wind conditions. |
● | Development of mine plans to optimize the use of acoustic barriers to control noise to key receptors. |
Noise control measures:
● | Location of the waste rock stockpile to provide an acoustic barrier between mining pits and town site where this is practical. |
● | Replacement of excavator horns signaling dump truck operators, with an alternative ‘quiet’ signal |
● | Fit only ‘broadband’ reversing alarms to mobile equipment. |
● | Use of haul road acoustic bunds on the receptor side of exposed haul roads, to minimize haul truck noise propagation to the Ravensthorpe town site. |
● | During night periods: |
○ | dumping of waste rock behind acoustic barriers to control noise emissions to the key receptors. |
○ | use of haul truck routes with acoustic barriers on the receptor side of the road |
○ | use of wheel dozers to minimize generation of track noise. |
● | Crusher and Processing Plant – Acoustic barrier bunds on the southern sides of the crusher unit and processing plant. |
17.1.6.3 | Blast and Vibration |
Mt Cattlin is a hard rock lithium mine where conventional bench drilling and blasting techniques are used to fracture the rock to allow excavation. Sensitive structures identified as part of blasting risk assessment include residential houses at 810m from the tenement boundary (but 1.5 km from the nearest open pit).
Galaxy has developed a Blast Management Plan (GDMS-02-HSE-PLA-0014) (Galaxy 2020) to manage blasting activities located at the Mt Cattlin mine, inclusive of monitoring, reporting and communication requirements. Long-term vibration and air-blast monitoring records demonstrate compliance with Regulation 11: Blasting Operations, of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations, 1997.
17.1.6.4 | Weeds |
Increased vehicle traffic has the potential to introduce soil and vegetative material that may contain weeds and seeds from other environments. Introduction and/or increased spread of weeds can degrade the condition and resilience of local vegetation.
Introduction and/or the increased spread of weed species in topsoil stockpiles can also reduce native seedbank, soil viability and the suitability of growth medium required to establish vegetation in rehabilitated areas.
17.1.6.5 | Spills and Leaks |
Spills, pipeline failure, material containment or equipment malfunction may result in discharge to the local environment. Substances posing a risk of environmental harm if discharged include:
● | Hydrocarbons, reagents, and other chemicals used in mining and ore processing. Diesel fuel is brought into the site to power the mining fleet and the site power station. |
● | Process slurries. Handling of most process slurries will largely be restricted to the processing plant area. Overland pipeline/s are installed for transfer of tailings slurry from the processing plant to the operating 2SE Pit TSF. Tailings slurry is typically alkaline (pH 8 -10) but generates acidity when exposed to oxygen and natural waters, such that recovered TSF decant water is slightly acidic (pH 5 – 7) |
● | Mine water. Mine water is transferred to storage tanks for use in dust suppression and to the raw water settling pond at the Process Plant, for use in ore processing. Mine water quality tends to be slightly more basic that natural groundwater but is similar to existing groundwater of the mineralised area, in terms of its elevated salinity and metal/metalloid concentrations. |
● | TSF decant water. Water recovered from the TSF decant will be returned to the processing plant area via overland pipeline/s. This water has the potential to be acidic, saline and contain elevated concentrations of metal and metalloids. |
Refueling occurs within a purpose-built facility with bunding and drainage to capture contaminated runoff, which is then directed to oil-water-separator and waste oil storage infrastructure.
Liquid chemical reagents are stored within tanks in appropriately bunded facilities whereby 110% of the largest vessel is contained and 25% of the total volume is contained according to Australian Standards AS1940 and AS1692. Stocks of solid reagents will be stored in a designated reagent shed, appropriately designed to comply with all relevant legislation.
17.2 | Heritage |
Heritage surveys were undertaken by Galaxy in conjunction with the Wagyl Kiap and Southern Noongar Native Title Group representatives in November 2008. One registered Site ID 26270 Mt Cattlin 2 and one other heritage place, Place ID 29352 Cattlin Creek were approved for disturbance to develop the 2SE Pit (Reg ID 73856) via two Section 18 Consents, 34/13042 (2011) and 69/09331 (2018).
In 2010 Galaxy completed negotiations with the Southwest Aboriginal Land and Sea Corporation (SWALSC) representing the Wagyl Kaip and Southern Noongar People with respect to a Native Title Claim Wide Mining Agreement covering the tenements surrounding Mt Cattlin. The mining agreement involves a range of provisions, including compensation during the life of the project and a commitment to direct employment, contracting and training initiatives for traditional owners.
It should be noted that the areas required for project development and operation are covered by granted tenements over which there is currently no native title however, there is an existing claim by the Wagyl Kaip and Southern Noongar Traditional Owner Groups.
In 2018, Galaxy entered a Noongar Standard Heritage Agreement (Non ILUA Proponents) with the SWALSC which defines the requirements for heritage surveys. Both agreements have been adequately upheld by both parties.
To fulfil its obligations under the Western Australian Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972, prior to development commissioned several Heritage Surveys were carried out across the main mining tenement M74/244 in conjunction with members of the Wagyl Kaip and Southern Noongar groups. As a result of a search of the Department of Indigenous Affairs (DIA) Aboriginal Heritage Sites Register prior to the site survey, it was determined that there were no previously recorded heritage sites within the project area.
During the field survey and consultations with the claimant representatives, no new ethnographic sites, as defined by Section 5 of the Western Australian Aboriginal Heritage Act (1972), were identified within the project mining leases.
In contrast to this, the archaeological survey identified sites within the mining impact area requiring management. In June 2011, Galaxy was granted consent by the DIA under a Section 18 application to access the affected site for the purpose of mining within the Registered Site ID 26270. A further Section 18 application was applied for in 2017 and granted in 2018 for the purpose of mining in the same site. The key condition applied to the Section 18 permits was that archaeological artefacts had to be recovered in the presence of the traditional owners and relocated to a safe place that would not be at risk of further development of any kind.
An Activity Notice was lodged with SWALSC on 10 February 2023 describing the proposed Waste Rock Dump (WD2) extension over agricultural land and seeking confirmation of Heritage Survey requirements in this area.
No formal response from SWALSC or Wagyl Kaip and Southern Noongar Agreement Group had been received at the time of the reserves update. By the terms of the Noongar Standard Heritage Agreement between SWALSC and Galaxy, further notification of the proposed activities may be lodged by Galaxy, giving a further 10 business day notice period, after which Galaxy may presume the Heritage Survey is not required.
Ongoing dialogue with Wagyl Kaip and Southern Noongar representatives will determine whether an additional heritage survey is required on the recently granted G74/13 and the overall site of the WD2 expansion area, prior to construction.
17.3 | Environmental Management System |
Mt Cattlin has a well-established system of management tools that are implemented across its everyday operations to control unwanted events that may impact the environment. These have been in place since the commencement of operations and have been regularly reviewed and
audited by numerous government agencies. Mt Cattlin has a well-established and implemented Environmental Management Plan (GLAL, 2020) and suite of operating procedures consistent with the principles of ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems and includes, but is not limited to:
● | Environmental Policy |
● | Requirements of approvals, permits and licenses |
● | Environmental responsibilities of site personnel |
● | Site induction programs |
● | Environmental monitoring and reporting requirements |
● | Inspection and audit process |
● | Non-conformance, corrective action, and risk management of incidents |
● | Preparation of procedures and work instructions addressing identified elements such as dewatering, saline spillage, waste management and bioremediation |
● | Stakeholder consultation. |
17.4 | Site Hydrology and Hydrogeology Introduction |
The Mt Cattlin site is positioned within the upper reaches of the Cattlin Creek catchment. Cattlin Creek is a significant ephemeral creek which passes through the mine site via a diversion constructed in 2019. The catchment area, including Cattlin Creek is show in Figure 17-5.
Figure 17-5 – Hydrological Assessment Study Location.
17.4.1 | Climate |
Ravensthorpe has a temperate climate with warm to hot summers and cool winters. Average monthly rainfalls recorded at the Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) station at Ravensthorpe (Station
No. 010633) from 1901 to 2022, indicate rainfalls can occur throughout the year with generally more from May to September (Table 17-1). The annual average rainfall recorded is 429 mm, with the average monthly rainfall totals presented in Figure 17-6. Dam evaporation exceeds average rainfall in all months of the year, and by a factor of 3.8 annually (Luke, Burke, and O’Brien, 1988).
Table 17-1 – Average Rainfall and Dam Evaporation (Ravensthorpe), mm.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year | |
Rainfall | 24.2 | 26.4 | 32.5 | 32.4 | 43.7 | 43.2 | 47 | 45.5 | 41.6 | 38.4 | 30.4 | 23.5 | 429 |
Evap. | 260 | 194 | 169 | 118 | 77 | 55 | 65 | 73 | 93 | 135 | 179 | 226 | 1,644 |
Figure 17-6 – Average Monthly Rainfall Recorded at Ravensthorpe Station (BoM ID: 7068) (BoM, 2021a).
Temperatures recorded at Ravensthorpe (1962-2022) indicate monthly mean minimum temperatures ranging from 6.7 °C in August to 14.6 ºC in February; and monthly mean maximum temperatures ranging from 16.4 °C in July to 28.9 °C in January.
The BoM 2016 intensity-frequency-duration (IFD) rainfall data for the site (Latitude: 33.54oS, Longitude: 120.02oE) is presented in Figure 17-7.
Figure 17-7 – IFD Data for Mt Cattlin Study Area (BoM, 2021b).
17.4.2 | Topography and Catchment |
The ground elevations at the mine site, including pits and stockpiles, currently range from 175 m to 295 m Above Height Datum (AHD).
Cattlin Creek is the most significant watercourse in the area, with a catchment area of 12.1 km2 upstream of the mine site. The delineated streamlines in Figure 17-8 show Cattlin Creek flowing through the mine site via the creek diversion, as well as a catchment divide running north-south through the western portion of the mine site with a small creek flowing west under the Newdegate-Ravensthorpe Road (via a culvert crossing) to neighboring farmland. Another small creek flows east around the south boundary of the site before joining the main tributary of Cattlin Creek.
Figure 17-8 – Catchment Analysis.
17.5 | Hydrology |
Site wide flood modelling was completed between 2017 and 2018 and the resulting hydrology was used to inform the design of surface water management measures for operations and mine closure. This included design of the Cattlin Creek diversion and flood bunds (FPB1 and FPB2), which were constructed in 2019 at the locations shown in Figure 17-9.
A hydrological assessment as completed as part of the Feasibility study to inform mine planning and support regulatory approvals for the mine expansion, (excluding Waste dump 4). There was a new release of Australian Rainfall and Runoff in 2019 (ARR2019) with revised hydrological methods, therefore the hydrology of the mine site has been updated in this Feasibility Study for consistency with the recommendations of ARR2019.
Figure 17-9 – Proposed WD and pit expansions and existing Cattlin Creek diversion and flood bunds (FPB1 and FPB2).
17.5.1 | Surface Drainage |
The following design Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) events were adopted when developing concept designs for surface water management measures for operations and closure:
● | Operations: 1% AEP (i.e.,1 in 100-year) event |
● | Closure: Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) / Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) events. |
17.5.1.1 | Existing (Pre-Stage 4) Conditions |
The 1% AEP modelling results suggest there is no significant risk of flooding or scour and erosion at the mine site, with the results summarized below.
The 1% AEP flood event in Cattlin Creek is contained in diversion with between 6.5 to 7 m freeboard to the crest of flood bunds, thus satisfying the requirements in the basis of design. No upgrades are required to protect mining operations from flooding.
Peak 1% AEP velocities adjacent to the existing flood bunds (FPB1 and FPB2 shown in Figure 17-9) are less than 2 m/sec, and therefore the existing facing class rock protection on these bunds (Entech, 2023) is sufficient to protect from scour and erosion. No upgrade to the rock protection is required.
There are some areas within the mine area where minor ponding occurs with depths generally no more than 0.5 m, however there are some localized areas with depths of between 1.5 and 2.0 m. This ponding is mainly due to the grades adopted for cleared areas and construction of haul roads, and it does not pose a significant risk to operations. Site drainage works may be required to manage this nuisance water if required.
Direct rainfall on pits and waste dumps will be contained by perimeter bunding (refer Section 17.7.1) and does not present a risk to operations or downstream environments.
The Western Creek flows around the north-western boundary of the mine site, then west to Newdegate-Ravensthorpe Road. The water flows under the road via a culvert. Flows in this creek are unimpacted by mining.
Minor runoff flowing west of the processing area is captured and retained in an existing pond structure within the mine lease.
The Southern Creek flows along the southern mine site boundary, past WD1 before passing through an existing pond structure and into Cattlin Creek. The pond is likely to trap suspended sediment prior to discharge to the environment. The runoff from WD1 is contained by bunding on the benches, which acts to capture sediment and infiltrate runoff.
17.5.1.2 | Post Stage 4 Development Conditions |
17.5.1.2.1 | Operations |
The 1% AEP modelling results with the proposed additional waste dumps, Stage 4 pit and infrastructure in place suggest there is no significant risk of flooding or scour and erosion at the mine site, with negligible change in hydrology across the site when compared with the existing conditions. The results are summarized below.
The introduction of the proposed mine infrastructure shows no significant change in modelled 1% AEP flows, flood depths and velocities in the Cattlin Creek diversion and adjacent to the flood bunds. Therefore, no upgrades are required to protect mining operations from flooding.
The introduction of WD2 and Stage 4 pit does result in some minor changes in surface water runoff within the mine area, however the ponding depths are similar to existing conditions. This ponding is mainly due to the grades adopted for laydown areas and haul roads and does not pose a significant risk to operations. Site drainage works may be required to manage this nuisance water if required.
Construction of WD2 does not have a significant impact on flows in the Western Creek.
The proposed WD1 expansion works does not have a significant impact on flows in the Southern Creek. Further modelling would be required if Waste Dump is required.
17.5.1.2.2 | Closure |
The PMF modelling of closure conditions, with the proposed additional waste dumps and Stage 4 pit in place, identified surface water management measures required to establish a stable landform design at mine closure. The results and recommendations are summarized below.
The PMF flood event in Cattlin Creek overtops the existing flood bunds (FPB1 and FPB2). These flood bunds were previously designed to contain the PMF event, however the hydrological methods and hydraulic modelling have been updated in this study for consistency with ARR2019, resulting in a larger peak PMF flow. Therefore, the flood bunds should be raised and extended at the locations shown in Figure 17-10 to contain the PMF event. Analysis of the flood modelling results suggests the following:
● | The existing flood bund crest levels should be raised by: |
○ | FPB1: 2.0 m at FPB1 and extended approximately 80 m west |
○ | FPB2: 1.5 m at FPB2 and extended approximately 40 m south-east |
● | The duration of inundation above the existing bund crest levels is approximately 1 hour and peak velocities are less than 2 m/sec. Therefore, the extended sections of bund are likely to be constructed using inert basalt mine waste which is readily available at the mine site (crushed rock). It is recommended that geotechnical and civil assessment are completed to develop more detailed designs for closure. |
● | The existing facing class rock protection on FPB1 and FPB2 is sufficient to protect from scour and erosion and does not require upgrading for mine closure. |
Note that the recommendation to raise and extend FPB1 and FPB2 on Cattlin Creek to prevent overtopping in the PMF event, is a direct result of the updated hydrology and hydraulic modelling methods adopted in the 2023 Hydrological Assessment to ensure consistency with ARR2019. The proposed mine expansion landforms and infrastructure have no influence on the PMF flows estimated in Cattlin Creek and the associated FPB1 and FPB2 flood bunds.
Surface water modelling will be completed in future phases of mine closure planning, using the updated closure landform design when available. The size and volume of flows are minor and do not present a significant risk at closure.
Direct rainfall on rehabilitated waste dumps will be contained and infiltrated and thus does not present a risk to operations or downstream environments.
Peak PMF velocities around the southern toe of WD1 exceed 5 m/sec. The existing creek channel is approximately 1 m deep and between 10 and 20 m wide. Therefore, it is recommended that the
existing drainage channel is widened to 30 m at closure to reduce peak velocities to no more than 3.9 m/sec, and 1/4 tonne rock protection placed on along the southern toe of WD1 to a height of 1 m to protect from scour and erosion. Further channel widening can be used to reduce rock sizing if required. The location and extent of the WD1 drainage upgrades are shown in Figure 17-11.
Peak PMF velocities around WD2 are less than 2 m/sec therefore no rock protection is required at mine closure to protect the toe from scour and erosion.
Figure 17-10 – Locations Where Existing Flood Protection Bunds are to be Upgraded at Mine Closure.
Figure 17-11 – WD1: Recommended Drainage Upgrades for Mine Closure.
17.6 | Hydrogeology |
17.6.1 | Aquifers |
The main aquifers are fractures or joints within weathered and fresh volcanic rocks, and most of the water bores were sited on air-photo lineaments. Cattlin Creek appears to follow zones of weakness in the bedrock that are locally permeable. Open joints and fractures are mostly above 120 m depth; however, some have been intersected down to 270 m depth.
The pegmatites are generally of low permeability, and the geological characteristics of the main rock units in the Stage 4 development area are expected to be similar to those in the current Stage 3 area. Some targets for testing groundwater yields have been selected within that area based on recorded water intersections in reverse-circulation drillholes.
17.6.2 | Recharge and Discharge |
Groundwater in the volcanics is recharged by the infiltration of rainfall and runoff following heavy rainfall events. The high salinity of the groundwater indicates that recharge rates and groundwater throughflow are low.
Groundwater levels prior to mining were all below the bed level of Cattlin Creek, indicating that the creek in the mining area is a losing stream (i.e., a potential source of groundwater recharge). Enhanced recharge from the creek into the old Mt Cattlin gold mine workings, which are used as a
groundwater storage, is accomplished via bore BH01 in the creek bed. Other bores are used to extract water from the workings.
Prior to mining, the groundwater was flowing southwards, and is presumed to discharge along the coast in the Hopetoun region.
17.6.3 | Groundwater Levels |
Pre-mining groundwater level elevations, measured in exploration, production and TSF monitoring bores, are shown in Figure 17-12. The hydraulic gradient was steeply downwards to the south-east from a groundwater mound centered on the hill west of the mining area.
Figure 17-12 – Pre-Mining Groundwater Levels (m AHD) (Rockwater, 2023).
The most-recent groundwater monitoring review (Figure 17-13) shows groundwater levels in December 2022 followed a similar pattern to the pre-mining levels. However, they had generally risen by up to 6 m around the mining area; and by up to 12 m around the original TSF due to loading and infiltration of water from the TSF. Groundwater levels would be considerably lower in the mine
pits, although there are no monitoring points in or close to the pits, except WTD11 to the south where the groundwater level had fallen by 21 m to December 2022.
Groundwater levels have risen or remained near original levels in most bores near the mining area that were monitored in both 2008-10 and December 2022 (Figure 17-13). Notable is the 6 m rise in bore MB01, resulting from infiltration of water or hydraulic loading from TSF1; and declines of 15 m to 31.5 m in and near the main production bores (WTD22, 23, 28 and 29).
Near the mine pits, groundwater levels will be below the pre-mining levels, however there is no data to show this except for the low level in WTD11 (located approximately 1.3 km south of the active pit).
Figure 17-13 – Change in Groundwater Levels (m) From 2008-10 to December 2022 (Rockwater, 2023).
17.6.4 | Groundwater Quality |
17.6.4.1 | Prior to Mining |
Pre-mining groundwater salinities are shown in Figure 17-14. They cover a relatively small range for groundwater in a fractured rock aquifer, ranging from 24,400 to 37,400 mg/L TDS (similar to
seawater). In general, (not in all cases) salinity was lower in elevated areas and higher closer to the creek and other drainage lines.
Laboratory pH values ranged from 7.6 to 8.3, meaning that the water was slightly alkaline.
Groundwater analysis indicated the groundwater was of a sodium chloride type, with elevated magnesium and sulphate. Aluminum, iron, and manganese were at low concentrations, as was nitrogen; and phosphorus was generally below laboratory reference (detection) levels.
Figure 17-14 – Pre-Mining Salinity (mg/L TDS) (Rockwater, 2023).
17.6.4.2 | Recent Water Quality |
Salinities in November 2022 (the most recent analysis) were generally similar to pre-mining values, with some higher or lower. The largest changes since mining commenced were:
● | A decrease in salinity of 12,100 mg/L in WTD13 (located on the south-eastern boundary of active mining operations) |
● | An increase of 8,900 mg/L in WTD19 (located hydraulically cross-gradient and north-east of the mine, beyond the extent of influence from mining activities). |
The groundwater had become acidic (pH < 6) in 10 bores where water levels had risen to above pre-mining levels, in August 2021. The affected bores included MB02 to MB04, MB06 and WTD28 down-gradient (east) of the above-ground “paddock” TSF1; MB09 and MB11 adjacent to the SW pit which has been used for tailings storage; and WTD29 and WTD34 in the old Mt Cattlin gold workings. The acidity near the TSFs has been attributed to localized ferrolysis occurring within the monitored bores where water containing Fe2+ reacts with dissolved atmospheric oxygen introduced via the bore casing (Rockwater, 2014), rather than acidic seepage from the TSFs. The water within the old Mt Cattlin workings is probably acidic due to oxidation of sulfides of the mineralised rocks.
In November 2022, when only one of the TSF monitoring bores was sampled, MB01 had a pH of 5.7. In the other WTD-series production and monitoring bores that were sampled, the pH levels were circum-neutral, ranging from 6.8 to 7.4 (all slightly more acidic than when they were first sampled pre-mining).
The only notable change in groundwater quality is the lower pH values and corresponding increases in aluminum, manganese, and iron concentrations around and down-gradient (east) of TSF1. As shown by testing of bore MB04 in 2014, the low pH is localized, and caused by ferrolysis within the bore casings where oxygen introduced via the bores reacts with iron in the groundwater.
There is no other evidence from the 2021 and 2022 monitoring data of any decline in groundwater quality due to infiltration of tailings water from TSF1.
17.7 | Impacts of Mining |
17.7.1 | Surface Water |
Runoff from operational waste dumps will contain suspended sediment which has the potential to affect downstream environments if not adequately managed. To mitigate risk, waste dumps will be designed for operations and closure to contain and infiltrate direct rainfall-runoff for the 1% AEP and PMP events, respectively. The 2023 Hydrological Assessment conducted as part of the Feasibility Study assumed all direct rainfall-runoff is contained.
17.7.2 | Groundwater |
As discussed in Section 17.6.4.1, salinities in August 2021 and November 2022 were similar to those measured prior to mining. There have been no environmental receptors identified that could be impacted by mining activities. It is not expected that the proposed Stage 4 works will result in any significant changes to the local groundwater regime compared to that resulting at closure from the current mining plan.
17.7.2.1 | Pit Groundwater |
17.7.2.1.1 | Current Pit Groundwater Regime |
Groundwater inflows in the planned Stage 4 pit are likely to be similar to those observed in the previously mined NW (Dowling) pit area: averaging 4 to 5 L/s during dewatering. Test-pumping of planned bores within the Stage 4 pit area will provide hydraulic conductivity values that will be used in numerical modelling of likely dewatering flow rates, and in updating the nature of the final my voids.
17.7.2.1.2 | Post Closure Pit Groundwater Regime |
With the likely low values of hydraulic conductivity, except on localized joints and fractures, and the low rainfall and high evaporation rates, the final pit voids are expected to be permanent groundwater sinks. Consequently, pit lake levels after mining would remain below pre-mining groundwater levels. Salinities of water in the pit lakes will gradually increase, however there would be no movement of water from the pit lakes into the surrounding groundwater.
With continuing inflows to the pit after mining estimated to be about 2 to 3 L/s (say, 2.5 L/s = 216 m3/d average). Using that value, and the average rainfalls and dam evaporation rates given in Table 17-1, a water balance for the final Stage 4 pit void can be estimated with the following assumptions:
● | 80 % of the rain falling within the pit perimeter will report to the pit lake. |
● | Evaporation from the pit lake will be 90 % of average dam evaporation (reduced to allow for the high salinity of the water in the lake). |
On completion of mining, the water level of the pit lake will rise until there is a balance between groundwater inflows, rainfall accumulation, and evaporative losses. That balance is estimated to be reached at a reduced level of approximately 125 m AHD (i.e., approximately 110 m below the original static groundwater level).
Preliminary estimates indicate that after 100 years, the pit lake will have risen from the pit base at about 45 m AHD, to a level of about 80 m AHD, but the rate of rise will continue to decrease, and it is likely to take about 5,000 years to stabilize at about 125 m AHD.
A north-south section through the Stage 4 pit showing the pre-mining groundwater level and the water level in the final pit void is included as Figure 17-15.
Figure 17-15 – Section Through Stage 4 Pit Showing Pre-Mining and Final Void Groundwater Levels.
The salinity of the lake water will continue to increase until it becomes supersaturated after about 40 years. The lake will form a permanent groundwater sink, with no possibility of the highly saline water flowing from the lake back into the surrounding groundwater.
It is planned to refine the modelling of the pit voids following further hydrogeological work, including test-pumping of bores to determine hydraulic conductivity values.
17.8 | Overall Site Water Balance |
The overall site water balance is negative, although there is a paucity of data to reliably quantify the specific quantities. The main water user on site is the processing plant which recycles all process water. The main water losses on site are:
● | Evaporation – mine and process plant dust control, and TSF decant pond |
● | Tailings void water capture. |
The pit experiences relatively low levels of seepage (~5L/s) which is collected by floor sumps and used for dust suppression or pumped to the TSF decant pond to enter the process water stream. In addition, the plant draws the remaining required make-up water from the mined-out NE pit.
17.9 Stakeholder Engagement
17.9.1 Key Stakeholders
Allkem has successful history of meaningful consultation with identified stakeholder and decision-making authorities throughout the life of the Project. Allkem is committed to continuing the consultation process as part of ongoing operations, as well as through the site closure process, and finally tenement relinquishment. Current stakeholders are included in Table 17-2.
Table 17-2 – Identified Key Stakeholders and their Interest in the Project.
Organization | Interest |
Department of Water and Environment Regulation (DWER)
Department of Mines, Industry Regulation, and Safety (DMIRS)
Department of Planning, Lands, and Heritage (DPLH)
|
● Licensing and closure planning ● Contaminated site identification and remediation ● Water supply and groundwater licensing, usage monitoring and aquifer sustainability ● Disturbance management ● Evidence of rehabilitation standards ● Performance securities ● Closure provisioning ● Transfer of mine infrastructure to local landowners at closure Indigenous heritage sites and agreements.
|
Shire of Ravensthorpe |
● Community support programs ● Infrastructure use including potential transfer and management of former mine infrastructure.
|
Southern Noongar and Wagyl Kaip Traditional Owners
South-West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council
|
● Protection of Aboriginal heritage sites ● Preservation of the natural landscape. |
Mt Cattlin Community Consultation Group (MTCCCG) representing the broader Ravensthorpe community |
● Conserving the amenity and aesthetic value of Ravensthorpe township and surrounds ● Community involvement in rehabilitation and closure activities ● Post mining land use.
|
Ravensthorpe business community
Surrounding Property Owners
|
● Land access ● Exploration activities ● Post mining land use ● Infrastructure transfer/retention ● Weed management ● Individual property access agreements.
|
17.9.2 Stakeholder Engagement Strategy
Allkem has committed to effectively consult with its identified stakeholders through the following processes:
● | Regular update meetings with the Shire of Ravensthorpe and Ravensthorpe Business Association |
● | Ongoing consultation with local neighbors |
● | Ongoing consultation with Traditional Owner groups and presentations at the South-West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council working party meetings |
● | Appointment of an Environmental and Community Liaison Officer |
● | Regular quarterly presentations to the Ravensthorpe community |
● | Establishment of the Mt Cattlin Community Consultation Group in 2018 with members consisting of respected leaders of the community and Allkem senior management. Minutes of meetings and presentations are made publicly available https://www.mtcattlin.com.au/ccg |
Allkem will continue to engage with stakeholders on all mining matters including closure issues and will update the engagement strategy where feasible, following consultation with the local community.
17.10 Public Consultation
Allkem understand the importance of proactive community relations as a key principle in its day-to-day operations as well as for future development planning.
Stakeholders have been identified based on issues related to the scope of works and the geopolitical and traditional setting of the Project, including:
● | Regulatory institutions |
● | Local government bodies |
● | Government agencies |
● | Traditional Owner groups and authorities |
● | Local communities within a 5 km radius of the Project, and then those further away from the projects |
● | Non-government organizations with a presence in the Project area |
● | State agencies publish license applications and variations in state-based public media as a matter of regulation for comment. |
Extensive stakeholder consultation has been carried out since 2010, including distribution of background documentation, a series of information sharing meetings with key stakeholders and all residents, open days, and focus group discussions. Background information on the Project and potential impacts have been distributed to stakeholders both locally and nationally at different times.
Project stakeholders have been identified based on issues related to the scope of works and the geopolitical and traditional setting of the project. This includes regulatory institutions, local government bodies, government agencies, traditional authorities, local communities within a 5 km radius of the Project and those further away from the projects, and non-government organizations with a presence in the Project area.
Extensive stakeholder consultation has been carried out, including distribution of background documentation, a series of information sharing meetings with key stakeholders and all residents, and focus group discussions. Background information on the Project and potential impacts were distributed to stakeholders both locally and nationally.
Public consultation has continued with a wide variety of stakeholders since the draft EIS documents were submitted to EPA in 2017 and 2018 and the process continues. The International Finance Corporation Standard for Stakeholder Public Consultation was adopted. Presentations on the Project including impacts
and mitigations were made, and feedback and records were logged. Feedback and comments have been incorporated into the EIS documents submitted to EPA.
Generally, the stakeholders welcomed the Project because they will improve economic conditions in the area and create direct and indirect job opportunities. The local government authorities indicated that they will significantly improve upon their revenue base. The local communities are in expectation of getting jobs for the youth and benefitting from corporate social responsibility arrangements through the provision of boreholes, sanitation and health facilities, shea nut processing plants, corn mills, and dry season gardening amongst others. Stakeholders expressed concern about the adverse or negative impacts especially with regard to air and water pollution concerns, land take and compensation issues, food security issues, noise, vibration and traffic issues, relocation / resettlement, likely increase in some social vices and impacts on cultural sites / shrines. Proposed management and mitigation measures were generally accepted and viewed as satisfactory to address these concerns.
The consultation process is required to run concurrently with the life of the Project. Community Consultative Committees have been established in communities surrounding the Project Site. These Community Consultative Committees create a link between the Project and its stakeholders in the surrounding villages and provide advisory resources to the Project, so that efforts are appropriately directed. The composition of the Committee has been specifically targeted at reflecting the widest possible range of interest groups in the community and includes project employees, traditional leaders, administrative leaders, youth groups, woman’s representatives, business leaders and opinion leaders. The Committees meet regularly and acts as a forum and consultative group channeling information to and from the Project.
17.10.1 Community Consultative Group
Galaxy established the Community Consultation Group (CCG) in August 2018 to provide a platform for the community to communicate directly with the Company. The CCG conducts regular meetings with the aim to improve the social well-being of individual groups and organizations of the local community.
The CCG consists of ten members, eight from the community of Ravensthorpe and two from Galaxy’s management team at Mt Cattlin. The CCG Terms of Reference sets out the group’s:
● | Purpose |
● | Objectives |
● | Roles and responsibilities |
● | Membership selection, terms, and requirements |
● | Code of conduct |
● | Draft meeting agenda. |
Community members are encouraged to contact a CCG member directly for any concerns or issues they have regarding Mt Cattlin’s operations.
The specific objectives of the CCG are to:
● | Provide a forum to develop and strengthen long-term relationship between Mt Cattlin and the |
community. |
● | Build trust and confidence in Allkem by members of the community. |
● | Provide timely transfer of information, comments, concerns, and feedback between Mt Cattlin and the community. |
● | Provide accurate and effective communication between Mt Cattlin and the community. Make Mt Cattlin more accessible to the community. |
● | Support Mt Cattlin with delivering an effective community engagement process during all phases of mining. |
● | Enable Mt Cattlin to consider community feedback for everyday operation activities. |
● | Provide transparency to the community. |
● | Allow collaboration regarding the management of issues. |
17.11 | Environmental Permit Requirements |
17.11.1 Environmental Legislative Framework
Allkem have completed numerous baseline environmental studies (during and prior to operations) and all key studies have been completed in all areas except Waste Dump 4 where additional baseline studies will be required. The permitting process is well understood and Allkem do not believe that there are constraints that will prevent permitting.
Allkem has obtained all relevant permits required to operate as listed below in Table 17-3.
Table 17-3 – Mt Cattlin Permits and Key Legislation.
Governing Agency | Permit and Governing Legislation |
Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage - DPLH) | Section 18 permits |
Environmental Protection Act 1986 (Department of Water and Environmental Regulation - DWER) | Part V Prescribed Premises License: L 8469/2010/2, |
Part V Clearing Permits: CPS 3045/5, CPS 8052/2, CPS 8049/1 | |
Mines Safety and Inspection Act 1994 (Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety) | Project Management Plan |
Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (Department of Water and Environmental Regulation) | Groundwater License: GWL 167439(5) |
To ensure compliance, Allkem submits Annual Environmental Reports to the relevant government agencies. To date there have been no material non-compliance issues with any permit conditions or legislative requirements at Mt Cattlin.
17.11.2 Mining proposals
The regulatory approval request is submitted to the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) in a Mining Proposal, the Mining Proposal provides detailed information on the identification,
evaluation, and management of the environmental impacts. All Mining Proposals must include a mine closure plan.
A Mining Proposal to support the Stage 4 expansion activities outlined in this study has been submitted to DMIRS, as described in other sections these will require updates to support the full extraction of reserves.
There is an allowance in the schedule for the Mining Proposal to take four months to be approved before activities on site may be impacted. At the time of feasibility study, the approval timeline was well advanced and DMIRS had not indicated any issue that may delay approval as expected.
Further Mining Proposals will need to be submitted for the full scope of Stage 4 development, as outlined in 17.11.5.
17.11.3 Mine Closure Plan
A Mine Closure Plan has been submitted, as required, with the Mining Proposal. It is a renewed version of the previously submitted and accepted version by DMIRS, outlining the remediation that Allkem will undertake upon the closure of the mine.
Mine Closure plans require updating as the additional Mining Proposals are submitted and approved.
17.11.4 Prescribed Premises License
The site holds a Prescribed Premises License L8469/2010/2 issued by DWER under Part V of the Western Australian Environmental Protection Act which permits activities, and sets out the monitoring and reporting requirements, associated with:
● | Tailings disposal |
● | Water bores |
● | Fugitive dust emissions |
● | Waste disposal (industrial waste and tires) |
The PPL has been updated numerous times since its first issuance in October 2010. The PPL expiry date is October 2029.
17.11.5 Future Permits
A new Mining Proposal will need to be submitted to seek DMIRS approval for a new In-Pit Tailings Storage Facility and Stage 4-2 of the open pit (only Stage 4-1 is covered in the current Mining Proposal).
A further updated Mining Proposal, along with an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) referral will be required to be submitted should waste dump space to the Northeast of the site be required to accommodate the full bulk of mine waste in Stage 4-2. The EPA referral is required as the area being considered for extra waste dumping would require clearing a significant area of native vegetation.
This new Mining Proposal process will commence upon the successful receipt of the under-assessment Mining Proposal discussed above, to provide optionality for the project whilst the technical, economic, and social trade-offs of a pit cut-back for Stage 4-2 and/or an underground operation are assessed as the most appropriate mining methodology.
Other Stage 4 capital projects, such as the development of a dedicated staff village on freehold, a new and modernized power supply, and groundwater abstraction will require a series of new and/or altered Works Approvals or modifications to Licenses, issued by the WA State Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER).
17.12 Land Disturbance
Prior to initial project development, the site was predominantly privately owned, cleared agricultural land used for cropping and grazing, with some isolated pockets of remnant vegetation. Expansion of the mine to the east of the original Dowling Pit in 2018 occurred in a stand of remnant vegetation that had been previously disturbed by historic mining and exploration activities, as well as local community recreation activities such as motorbike riding. Clearing of up to 95 hectares of remnant vegetation for project development has been approved by clearing permits whilst development in previously disturbed agricultural land does not require such approval.
The current total area of land disturbance, both agricultural and vegetation, approved for all mining and exploration activities on the main project tenement M74/244 is approximately 380 hectares. The current approvals cover the expected land disturbance for the remainder of the life of mine, with the proposed project expansions occurring predominantly in previously disturbed agricultural land, other than as noted above in respect of waste dumping if Stage 4-2 open pit requires additional waste dumping.
The process applied by Allkem for all land disturbance activities includes:
● | Conduct baseline environmental (flora/vegetation/fauna) and heritage surveys, |
● | Acquire relevant permits if proposed land disturbance is not already permitted, |
● | Seek internal approval to conduct land disturbance via Allkem mandated ground disturbance permit, |
● | Clear vegetation where it occurs, strip topsoil/subsoil and store in stockpiles away from drainage for use in progressive rehabilitation of key infrastructure such as waste rock landforms. |
All land disturbances are reported in the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) and Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER) Annual Environmental Reports.
Under the Mining Rehabilitation Fund Regulations 2013, Allkem is required to calculate its ‘open’ land disturbance area per infrastructure category and its ‘rehabilitated’ land area on an annual basis, for each tenement. Each land disturbance category has a per hectare unit rate ranging from US$2,000 to US$50,000 dependent on the environmental risk, for example Tailings Storage Facilities (TSFs) and Waste Rock Landforms (WRLs) attract the highest unit rate. The land disturbance area for each category is multiplied by its respective unit rate and totaled across all categories, with Allkem required to pay an annual levy of 1% of the calculated total.
17.13 Waste Rock Landforms
The routine mining operations at Mt Cattlin include the movement of competent inert and predominantly basaltic waste rock material. The mine plan endeavors to maximize the amount of waste material returned to previously mined, sterilized open pit voids such as the Dowling, 2 NE Pit and 2 SE Pit. This backfilling strategy is prioritized over the development of WSLs for the following reasons:
● | Minimizes the need for clearing of vegetation and further land disturbance, |
● | Removes the safety hazards associated with deep open pit voids post closure of the mine, |
● | Shorter waste rock haulage distances reducing operational costs, |
● | WSLs require increased earthmoving inputs and prescriptive rehabilitation methods to reduce closure liability with greater annual monitoring commitments post mining. |
The WRLs are constructed as a series of terraces up to 60 m in vertical height, are designed to conform to the local topography and to maintain the aesthetics of the surrounding landscape. The WRL construction sequence involves initial placement of waste rock via dump truck at ground surface level which is then developed in two or three lifts between 10 m and 20 m high, with batter faces initially constructed at the angle of repose. Each lift of the WRL is to be reprofiled to create a final batter angle of 18° with back sloped berms 5 m to 10 m wide to retain any batter runoff and assist with revegetation.
Due to the significant volumes of benign competent waste rock, the WRL’s are designed to be water harvesting landforms so that significant rainfall events will be contained within the stockpile, prevent runoff, and avoid erosion.
Rehabilitation of the waste dump stockpile will include topsoil, subsoil and targeted vegetation replacement, contour ripping, and seeding of the ripped surface with plant species of local provenance.
17.14 Tailings Storage Facility
The original above-ground TSF1 facility has been allowed to dry and been covered with a layer of reject tails to limit dust from the facility. The dried tailings contain significant remnant spodumene and a study into reprocessing these tailings is being investigated.
As part of licensing requirements, independent geotechnical and hydrological specialists conduct audits of the tailings storage facility. The TSF is operated in accordance with a TSF Management Plan and with all relevant applicable legislative requirements.
17.15 Low Grade Ore Stockpiles
Temporary low-grade stockpiles have been constructed at a location adjacent to the processing plant. Stockpiled low grade may be treated in the plant prior to the plant closure or sold as an aggregate material for clean fill purposes.
Should material remain at the end of operations, this will be rehabilitated in situ using a similar procedure to the waste rock landform rehabilitation.
17.16 Noise
Mt Cattlin is located two kilometers north of the Ravensthorpe township. In 2020, mining and processing activities were approved by DWER to operate for 24 hours per day and seven days per week. Allkem is required to comply with the conditions assigned by the prescribed premises license and the assigned noise levels defined by the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997, to ensure that noise emissions are below assigned levels at the nearest sensitive receptors.
To maintain compliance, Allkem has developed an Operational Noise Management Plan 2019 (ONMP) which defines noise management controls and a noise emission monitoring program to ensure compliance. The ONMP is reviewed on an annual basis and has been approved by both the DWER and DMIRS via numerous permit applications for project expansion.
Monitoring is conducted at nearby sensitive receptors, located in adjacent residences, by independent qualified Acoustic Engineers on a quarterly basis, and results provided in the DWER Annual Environmental Report (AER) submissions. Data from the acoustic monitoring program is also made publicly available to the Shire of Ravensthorpe residents and other interested parties.
17.17 Air Quality
Gaseous emissions are limited to those from vehicle and equipment exhaust emissions. Dust emissions is the main air quality generated from the following activities:
● | Blasting, |
● | Earthmoving equipment on unsealed internal roads, |
● | Waste rock movement at the WRL, |
● | ROM ore handling and ore crushing, |
● | Large, exposed surface areas such as the top of the WRL and TSF. |
Although dust emissions can be significant under certain climatic conditions, such as during high winds or dry conditions, dust generation at the mine site is effectively controlled through the implementation of management actions as outlined in the Mt Cattlin Airborne Material Management Plan 2020 (AMMP). The AMMP is reviewed on an annual basis by external air quality specialists to ensure that the management and monitoring strategies are suitable for the current state of mining and processing operations.
Typical dust management methods are employed such as:
● | Watering of mine haul roads and other exposed areas, |
● | Weather prediction analysis and utilization of stop-work procedures in high wind conditions, |
● | Covering exposed areas including TSF surfaces with coarse reject tailings, |
● | Progressive land disturbance and progressive rehabilitation of disturbed areas to reduce open area exposure time to wind erosion. |
Air monitoring is conducted by Mt Cattlin’s Environmental Department personnel to determine the quality and quantity of emissions via two methods, the use of deposition gauge sampling stations situated around the mine perimeter and in the Ravensthorpe town, and a continuous High Volume Air Sampler located in the center of town.
All monitoring and sampling collection methods are conducted in accordance with Australian Standards (AS/NZS 3580), samples analyzed by NATA accredited laboratories and results assessed against National Environmental Protection Measure ambient air quality standards.
Like noise, air quality monitoring results are monitored and reported and are also made publicly available to the Shire of Ravensthorpe residents and other interested parties.
17.18 Environmental Liabilities and Other Encumbrances
The permit conditions and commitments made by Mt Cattlin in associated permit application supporting documents provide a framework for managing the environmental and social impacts of mining activities to be as low as reasonably practicable and to achieve the following objectives:
● | Good stewardship of natural resources, consistent with safe and efficient mining practices, |
● | Minimal disturbance of land and utilization of existing disturbed areas for project expansion where feasible, |
● | Conservation of flora and fauna habitats, |
● | Protection of sites of cultural and spiritual significance, |
● | Confirmation of the success of impact control measures by means of monitoring and audits, |
● | Compliance with all statutory requirements, |
● | Rehabilitation to a safe, stable, non-polluting landform and an acceptable post-disturbance land use and land capability, |
● | Preservation of downstream water quality and quantity, |
● | Transparent engagement with the Ravensthorpe Community. |
To confirm compliance with the conditions and commitments, Allkem submits Annual Environmental Reports for review by officers of the relevant agencies. To date there have been no material non-compliance issues with any permit conditions or other legislative requirements.
The only known environmental liability applicable to the site relates to the usual rehabilitation of mining and processing activities undertaken on site. Mt Cattlin has a Closure Plan for this work, approved by the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (“DMIRS”).
At the end of the Mt Cattlin project life, the freehold property will remain in ownership of Allkem.
17.19 Rehabilitation and Closure
The Mt Cattlin Rehabilitation and Closure practices are prescribed in the Mine Closure Plan, which has been prepared in accordance with the Guidelines for Preparing Mine Closure Plans and approved by DMIRS. The document is publicly available via the DMIRS website.
The purpose of the Mine Closure Plan included the following:
● | Identification of closure obligations and relevant legislation, |
● | Detail any key stakeholder consultation undertaken previously and plans for continued consultation, |
● | Development of Completion Criteria and Completion Objectives, |
● | Identify any potential closure issues and associated management strategies, |
● | Define rehabilitation and closure implementation strategies, |
● | Outline rehabilitation and completion criteria monitoring methods. |
Mt Cattlin is focused on ensuring that mine scheduling incorporates progressive rehabilitation to disturbed land during operations. This involves rehabilitating any land that is no longer required for operational purposes as soon as it is available to generate a safe, stable, and non-polluting landscape to support post- mining land uses such as agriculture or a self-sustaining native vegetation ecosystem. This progressive approach to rehabilitation enables the early commencement of disturbance revegetation prior to mining completion, so that the duration of the post closure rehabilitation maintenance and management liability is reduced by undertaking rehabilitation during operations, and maintaining the trajectory towards meeting agreed completion criteria so tenure can be relinquished as soon as possible.
Annual rehabilitation monitoring conducted during the operations phase has enabled Allkem to understand the most successful methods of rehabilitation. Through trials and benchmarking with other projects, adjustments have been made to managing those that require rectification. Improvement works have been undertaken particularly on the WRL to alleviate minor erosion after significant rainfall events, and supplement seed or plant tube stock in underperforming areas of revegetation.
A detailed Closure Cost Estimate (CCE) is undertaken annually by an external consultant for the currently developed and approved domains of Mt Cattlin. The detailed CCE is commercially confidential and includes financial provisions for:
● | Administration, |
● | Maintenance, monitoring, and auditing programs, |
● | Failed rehabilitation or additional monitoring, |
● | Ongoing stakeholder engagement process, |
● | Closure project management costs, |
● | Specialist consultant and legal fees, |
● | Legal obligations associated with approval conditions, |
● | Provision for premature closure, potential delays, extreme events, or other external factors relevant to closure. |
The rehabilitation and closure process developed is consistent with industry leading practice.
17.20 Summary of Environmental, Social and Permitting.
The Allkem employee set forth herein is familiar with the Environmental, Permitting and Closure requirements for the project. This work has largely been completed by Mt Cattlin and Tetris Environmental. The key observations are:
● | Mt Cattlin has completed numerous baseline environmental studies (during and prior to operations) and all key studies have been completed and there are no ongoing constraints preventing ongoing development and mining. Should Waste Dump 4 be required then additional baseline studies will be required. |
● | Mt Cattlin has obtained all relevant permits required for current operations. |
● | At the date of reporting reserves Mt Cattlin was in compliance with all permits. |
● | A Mining Proposal has been lodged with the regulator (DMIRS) for the development of Stage 4-1 pit and additional waste dumping; this approval is seeking the expansion of the pit and relocation of the SW tailings. Approval was considered routine and was expected in August 2023. |
● | A new Mining Proposal will need to be submitted following the receipt of the approval for the currently lodged proposal, to permit the use of NE pit IPTSF. The highest priority is the new NE IPTSF as the current TSF will reach capacity in mid-2024. The new TSF will be the third similar style of TSF at Mt Cattlin and therefore is not a novel concept. Whilst the approval should be relatively straightforward and non-controversial, the time remaining to design and gain the approval, inclusive of any intermediate delays or required changes of scope, could elevate the risk to production given the expected exhaustion of tailings capacity in the SE pit IPTSF in mid-2024. |
● | A further Mining Proposal process will commence upon the successful receipt of the currently lodged Mining Proposal discussed above, to provide optionality for the project whilst the technical, economic, and social trade-offs of a pit cut-back for Stage 4-2 and/or an underground operation are assessed as the most appropriate mining methodology. Should open pit mining of Stage 4-2 ultimately be decided on by Allkem and further waste dumping space to the Northeast be required then an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) referral will be required. The EPA referral is required as the area being considered for extra waste dumping would require clearing a significant area of native vegetation. |
● | Other Stage 4 capital projects, such as the development of a dedicated staff village on freehold land, a new and modernized power supply, and groundwater abstraction will require a series of new and/or altered Works Approvals or modifications to Licenses, issued by the WA State Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER). |
● | Allkem do not believe that there are constraints that will prevent permitting. |
● | Mt Cattlin has no known environmental liabilities other than rehabilitation/ closure obligations. |
● | Mt Cattlin is required to pay a per hectare unit rate for land disturbance as part of the Mining Rehabilitation Fund Regulations 2013. |
● | The closure and rehabilitation of the site post operations is prescribed in the Mine Closure Plan prepared in accordance with the Department of Mining, Industry, Regulation and Safety and outlines |
the closure obligations. The Mine Closure Plan identifies and sets out management of any potential closure issues and defines and outlines the site rehabilitation requirements. |
● | Mt Cattlin has focused on mine scheduling that allows for progressive rehabilitation to all disturbed land during operations. Annual rehabilitation monitoring is conducted on site and a detailed Closure Cost Estimate (CCE) is completed annually. An updated Mine Closure Plan has been submitted with the current Mining Proposal which estimates a closure cost of US$12.3M. |
● | Mt Cattlin has built up social credit with the local community over the past decade through local employment, operating without major incident, and initiatives such as the Community Consultation Group (CCG) and site Open Days. |
18. CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS
This chapter discusses the capital and operating cost estimates that were developed as a part of the Stage 4 Feasibility Study, and which are used in Chapter 19 Economic Analysis.
The operating costs have been derived from onsite budgets and actual operating history, or in the case of mining costs via negotiated tender and detailed schedule and are considered at a Feasibility Study level of confidence. The overall capital costs are based off industry benchmarking, and considered to be a pre- feasibility study level of confidence (Entech, 2023)
The Mt Cattlin Stage 4 Feasibility study has noted that the overall cost estimation is judged to have an accuracy range of ±15% which is reflective of the level of development of the Project and is typical of a Feasibility Study.
18.1 Basis of Costing
The costs were based on a monthly forecast of costs and modelled in an Excel based financial model.
Mt Cattlin is an operating mine and capital costs projections exclude sunk costs already incurred in developing the project to date, and any ongoing costs that may be incurred that are not directly associated with the Mt Cattlin operation such as business development, exploration costs and further resource definition beyond the current Mineral Resources.
No allowances have been included within the estimates for the following items:
● | Goods and Services Tax (GST – this is a refundable expense) |
● | Withholding taxes |
● | Escalation or inflation |
● | Financial charges of any description |
● | Interest |
All cost estimates are expressed in United States (US$), unless stated otherwise.
18.1.1 Mining Cost Estimation
The mining cost estimate considered all costs incurred to mine material, deliver it to the stockpiles, waste dumps and ROM pads. The battery limits of the cost estimations were as follows:
● | Mining site preparation and establishment |
● | Mining disestablishment and demobilization |
● | Road construction and maintenance between mining areas and the processing facility |
● | Mine dewatering of the pits |
● | Mining-specific capital costs only |
● | Diesel rate of US$0.99 per liter post rebate. |
The cost basis for the estimate has been developed to represent the mining methods outlined within this report. Cost estimates represent expenditures required to develop and mine the Mt Cattlin Stage 4 Expansion. Operating cost estimates are supported by information from the following sources:
● | Mining Services Contract Tendered Schedule of Rates |
● | Other surface mining assumptions are drawn from historical actuals or first principles/benchmarks. |
Where possible, parties have sought quotations for costs, however in some instances, costs have not been available by quotation. In these instances, costs have been worked up from first principles or the parties have used in-house database information available from cost estimates for similar projects.
18.2 Site Capital Costs
The Life-of-mine capital expenditure has been calculated to total US$80.3M, which includes a sustaining capital expenditure of US$21.5M summarizes (Table 18-1).
Being an operating mine capital costs are a modest part of the overall cost structure, <10%, and not a material driver in the economic analysis.
Table 18-1 – Life of Mine Capital Expenditure Summary.
Capital Type | US$M |
Site Capital | 41.1 |
Closure | 12.3 |
Mining | 5.6 |
Sustaining | 21.5 |
Total Capital Costs | 80.3 |
Variances in totals may be due to rounding. |
Table 18-2 details expenditure for site capital and includes an allowance for the new NE In-Pit Tailings Storage Facility (IPTSF) as the current SE IPTSF will reach capacity in 2024.
To create a buffer zone around the Mt Cattlin site, a provision of US$4.7M has been allowed for neighboring land purchases. Due to the operation’s proximity to the town of Ravensthorpe and location in an active cropping and grazing farming district, the site has more interaction with neighbors than is typical in Western Australia. Creation of a buffer zone will lessen potential impacts such as noise, dust, and light spill, as well as provide land for future growth should it be needed.
A nominal sum of US$35M has been allowed for the construction of a flotation circuit attached to the existing DMS processing plant, to facilitate the retreatment of approximately 900,000 t of tailings in TSF1, based on benchmarking Entech believe that the capital estimate is at PFS level. Current testwork shows the retreatment is feasible, and further testwork should enhance the economics and technical robustness of the
Project. It is assumed the retreatment happens at the end of the mine life and the expenditure accounted for at that time.
Table 18-2 – Site Capital Expenditure.
Capital Type | US$m |
TSF | 1.4 |
Land Purchase | 4.7 |
Tailings Retreatment | 35.0 |
Total Site Capital Costs | 41.1 |
Closure capital costs of US$12.3m have been allocated for the end of the project life, derived from the existing mine closure plan, as is deemed reasonable based on the site footprint size and nature of tasks at hand. The allowance assumes a material amount of progressive rehabilitation is undertaken during the project’s operational life.
Table 18-3 shows a general sustaining capital expenditure of US$0.7m per annum has been allowed for equipment replacements typically seen on sites such as Mt Cattlin that have been operating for around 10- years. The expenditure can be thought of as ‘lumpy opex,’ for example expenditure that is operational in nature, however, occurs at times in excess of one year, such as the casing of a key pump – the internal wear parts are replaced several times a year as operating expenditure, but the casing may need replacement every 3-years.
A precursor to the Stage 4 mine expansion is the removal of tailings within the completed 2SW IPTSF which is immediately adjacent to the current Stage 3 pit. A nominal costing of US$14/BCM has been allowed for, over an 8-month period, US$14/BCM including a significant allowance made on top of the tendered mining contract rates. The task is likely to be slow and bespoke, and unsuited to being included in the main mining contract. The task totals US$17.7 m.
Table 18-3 – Sustaining Capital Expenditure.
Capital Type | US$m |
Processing Plant | 3.7 |
Removing in-pit tailings from 2SW IPTSF | 17.7 |
Total Sustaining Capital Costs | 21.5 |
18.2.1 Mining Capital Cost Estimate
The total mining capital cost estimate is US$5.6M. A breakdown of the total capital estimate by area is shown in Table 18-4.
Mining Capital Costs are based on the negotiated schedule of rates, given the nature of the costs and small size no contingency was applied.
These capital costs include:
● | Clear and grub, and topsoil stripping; clearing material over the waste dump and pit footprint to a 300 mm depth. This cost also includes movement of the material to a designated topsoil dump. |
● | Establishment: Setting up mining facilities for the contract miner. |
● | Mobilization and Demobilization; Movement of the mining contractor’s equipment and personnel. |
Table 18-4 – Total Mining Capital Cost.
Description | US$m |
Clear & Grub and Topsoil Strip | 0.4 |
Establishment | 0.5 |
Mobilization | 3.7 |
Demobilization | 0.9 |
Total Mining Capital Costs | 5.6 |
18.3 Site Operating Costs
This section covers operating costs in the processing and general administration areas.
Operating costs were derived from operating experience in the case of Processing, and General and Administration costs, or from a negotiated tender in respect of Mining costs.
18.3.1 Processing and General and Administration
The key operating cost inputs are shown in Table 18-5, and were predominantly sourced from Mt Cattlin’s budget forecasts, which have their basis in the site’s historical operating data.
The costs of operating the processing facility are a combination of fixed and variable elements, from previous experience a split of 50% fixed cost and 50% variable cost has been found to accurately reflect the cost build- up, and this was applied to the model.
The General and Administration (G&A) costs represent the site operating costs less processing and contract mining. Essentially it is Mt Cattlin administration, power, accommodation, flights, and management, technical, administrative, and compliance staff costs. It does not include any Allkem corporate costs. Similar to the Processing cost center, if the plant was not operating at nameplate capacity, the total true G&A costs of running site would be understated by using a fully variable cost assumption. A more robust method was to convert the fully variable rate to a fixed charge of US$1,018,500 per month.
Table 18-5 – Key Operating Cost Assumptions.
Assumption | Unit | Value |
Transport | ||
Surface Haulage Costs | US$/wmt concentrate trucked | 25.57 |
Port Costs | US$/wmt concentrate shipped | 14.06 |
Moisture | % | 2.0 |
Processing | ||
Fixed | US$/month | 2,184,000 |
Variable | US$/t ore processed | 14.56 |
General and Administration (G&A) | ||
Fixed | US$/month | 1,018,500 |
Royalty | ||
LRC Royalty | US$/t ore processed | 1.05 |
Western Australian State | % | 5.0 |
Total operating expenditure over the life of the project is US$899 m (Table 18-6), by key operating cost centers by mine stage, including the end-of-life stockpiles (low grade, fine-grained, and tailings retreatment) that are scheduled to be processed.
Table 18-6 – LOM Operating Costs by Mining Stage.
Operating Expenditure (US$m) | Stage 3 | Stage 4-1 | Stage 4-2 | Stockpiles | Total |
Mining | 33.4 | 150.2 | 247.8 | 0 | 431.4 |
Transport | 14.4 | 8.3 | 11.2 | 3.1 | 37 |
Processing | 61.9 | 48.3 | 86.2 | 58.1 | 254.5 |
G&A | 14.9 | 12.6 | 26.7 | 11 | 65.2 |
Royalty | 51.9 | 17.8 | 31.6 | 9.1 | 110.4 |
Total Operating Expenditure Costs | 176.6 | 237.2 | 403.5 | 81.2 | 898.5 |
The annual expenditure by category over the life of mine is displayed below in Figure 18-1.
Figure 18-1 – Annual Expenditure by Major Category.
18.3.2 Mining Operating Cost Estimate
The operating cost estimate was provided to Mining Plus by Allkem, completed by Entech as part of NI-43101 Ore Reserve Estimate and the Mt Cattlin Stage 4 Feasibility Study. Mining Plus has relied the cost information, sources of estimation and the economic model provided to Mining Plus in order to determine the viability of the project and to evaluate and report on the Mineral Reserve estimation.
The direct mining costs used in the mining cost estimate are from the schedule of rates submitted by contractors in a competitive tender process. An interim mining schedule was prepared by Allkem and incorporated into a tender package (3-year term) prepared and issued to five contractors.
The returned submissions were then evaluated based on the following criteria:
● | Completeness |
● | Conformance to specifications |
● | Price |
● | Relevant experience. |
The mining cost model incorporates one selected bid from the latest pricing.
18.3.3 Summary of Mining Operating Cost
The operating costs are based on the following assumptions:
● | Ramp up to a maximum 12 M bcm a year mining rate. |
● | Open pit mining services provided by the selected mining contractor. |
● | Fixed and variable contract. Variable costs are calculated as a function of the relevant variable. |
Workforce levels vary as new deposits come online in the project. Mining maintenance, staff and safety personnel numbers change with each phase of the operation.
The total mining operating costs by pit is illustrated in Table 18-7.
Table 18-7 – Mining Operating Cost by Deposit.
Pit | US$m |
Stage 3-Phase 1 | 33.4 |
Stage 4-Phase 1 | 150.2 |
Stage 4-Phase 2 | 247.8 |
Total Operating Costs | 431.4 |
18.3.4 Open Pit Mining Costs
Open pit mining operating costs have been determined by the schedule of rates provided by the mining contractor. The mining cost is based on working 365 days per year, seven (7) days per week, with two (2) 12- hour shifts per day and includes allowances for the following items:
● | All mobile machinery |
● | Dayworks |
● | Drill consumables (in drill and blast rates) |
● | Dewatering |
● | Explosives |
● | Manpower for contractor operators and supervisors/managers |
● | PPE |
● | Tooling for the workshop |
● | Preliminary and ongoing primary pit dewatering |
● | Supply of diesel fuel to the contractor |
● | All flights, accommodation and messing for management and contractor personnel if applicable. |
18.3.5 Open Pit Load and Haul
Load and haul costs include all consumables, equipment, labor, and ancillary equipment required for the loading and hauling of all waste and ore material from the open pits to the waste dumps and ore stockpiles at each pit. Costs were calculated on a unit cost per Bank Cubic Meter (BCM) basis, with the unit cost increasing with depth below the pit crest.
Ancillary equipment costs include all equipment and labor contingency for supporting the primary fleet. This includes a consideration for lighting towers, service truck, dewatering and other miscellaneous equipment.
The open pit load and haul cost (tonnes of ore plus waste) averaged US$6.34/BCM of total pit production. In terms of plant feed, open pit mining costs an average of US$47.56/t ore processed. Open pit mining costs by pit stage are presented in Table 18-8.
Table 18-8 – Load and Haul Cost by Deposit.
Pit | US$m | US$/BCM |
Stage 3-Phase 1 | 19.9 | 6.51 |
Stage 4-Phase 1 | 94.5 | 5.91 |
Stage 4-Phase 2 | 165.5 | 6.58 |
Total Operating Costs | 279.9 | 6.34 |
18.3.6 Open Pit Drill and Blast
The overall drill and blast unit cost across all volume moved equated to US$2.94/BCM using rates generated by the open pit contractor. The drill and blast costing also has an allowance for diesel, a breakdown is shown in Table 18-9.
Table 18-9 – Drill and Blast Cost by Deposit.
Pit | US$m | US$/BCM |
Stage 3-Phase 1 | 11.0 | 3.61 |
Stage 4-Phase 1 | 46.3 | 2.92 |
Stage 4-Phase 2 | 67.9 | 2.82 |
Total Operating Costs | 125.3 | 2.91 |
18.3.7 Dayworks
A dayworks allowance of one percent of the total load and haul, drill and blast, and fuel costs have been costed. Dayworks cost over the life of mine equated to US$4.2m.
18.3.8 Diesel Usage
Diesel usage has been modelled and costed. Diesel usage for the open pit was based on the tender estimates received from the mining contractors.
18.3.9 Mine Overheads
Open pit mine contracting personnel oncosts including camp and FIFO costs have been included in the mining cost estimate. No company-based mine overheads were included within the mining estimate, as these have been captured in the G&A costs in the financial model provided.
18.3.10 Mine Services
Mine services costs were included in the mining contractor variable rates, and the scope is outlined below.
The following is captured in the Financial model provided by Allkem:
● | Mining management and administrative personnel captured in General and Administration. |
● | Pit pumping / dewatering (Contractor responsible for pumping to the main dewatering line installed by Allkem at the pit crest). |
Messing, accommodation and FIFO costs for all the mining service team’s personnel are considered within the mining cost overheads estimate.
18.3.11 Light Vehicles
Light vehicle costs were included in the mining contracting rate estimates and includes vehicles for the contract mining team.
18.3.12 Grade Control
Grade control is conducted by visually inspecting cuttings from the blast hole rigs, and geological ‘ore spotting’ when excavating pegmatite. An allowance for this has been captured in the G&A costs in the financial model.
19. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
This Chapter presents the results of the economic analysis completed for Mt Cattlin. Financial modelling was completed on a 100% project basis, using the discounted cash flow (DCF) method of analysis to assess the estimated economics and to evaluate the sensitivity of key input parameters on the expected returns. The financial assessment was completed on an unlevered basis.
19.1 Basis of Analysis
The financial evaluation is based on a DCF model, which involves projecting estimated revenues and subtracting estimated cash outflows such as operating costs including mining, crushing, processing, maintenance and general and administrative (G&A) costs, capital costs, and royalties to obtain the estimated net free cash flows.
The revenues and costs were forecast on a real (un-inflated basis) monthly basis in 2023 AUD. The data presented in this report is summarized from those forecasts into annual or, by pit stage, increments and converted into US$ at a fixed exchange rate.
Mt Cattlin pays the majority of its operating and capital costs in Australian dollar.
These net cash flows are discounted back to the valuation date using a real, after-tax discount rate of 10%, and then summed to determine the net present value (NPV) of Mt Cattlin as of 1 July 2023. There are no additional project or country-specific risk factors, or adjustments considered. For the purposes of discounting, the model assumes that all revenues, operating and capital costs, and resulting free cash flows occur at the end of each month.
The economic analysis is based on reserves only and includes all the in situ and stockpile reserves.
19.2 Economic Evaluation
The economic evaluation was provided to Mining Plus which was compiled using the financial data sourced from Allkem. The economic model calculated the revenue from the saleable product produced over time and subtracts the capital and operating costs (mining, processing, and selling costs) over time to produce a net cashflow. As an existing operation, Mt Cattlin requires only minor capital expenditure to support the Stage 4 expansion.
19.2.1 Product Pricing Assumptions and Revenue
Product pricing for this analysis has been provided by Allkem, the pricing in the economic analysis has been conservatively applied at lower prices than price forecasts provided by independent market analyst group Wood Mackenzie shown in Chapter 16. The price estimates used in the analysis are shown in Table 19-1.
Mt Cattlin sells a 5.4% Li2O spodumene concentrate. Allkem’s supplied pricing includes discounts for costs and penalties (e.g., shipping; marketing; concentrate grade reduction; penalty element exceedances) to give a Realized Li2O Price. The pricing used is therefore effectively a net US$ FOB price.
Tantalite (Ta2O5) concentrate is a by-product that contributes meaningful, but not material, revenue to the project. A flat sale price based on existing contracts has been applied to expected production. Tantalite revenues make up ~0.5% of the total revenue from Mt Cattlin.
A USD:AUD exchange rate forecast of 0.7:1.00 was provided by Allkem has been used for this study.
Table 19-1 – Forward Estimates for Concentrate Price and Foreign Exchange.
Period | Realized Li2O US$/dmt |
Realized Ta2O5 US$/dry lb. |
H2 CY23 | 4,048 | 24.3 |
CY24 | 2,074 | 24.3 |
CY25 | 1,425 | 24.3 |
CY26 | 2,375 | 24.3 |
CY27 | 2,103 | 24.3 |
CY28 | 1,762 | 24.3 |
The cashflow model was also tested at a flat US$1,500/dmt Li2O realized spodumene concentrate revenue used in the optimization, and cashflows remained positive for the overall ORE and each separable pit stage.
19.3 Revenue
Revenue received from all concentrate sales totals US$2,092m, of which Spodumene sales contribute 99.5% of the total. The revenue is derived using pricing forecasts for Spodumene and Tantalite concentrates provided by Allkem that average US$2,271/DMT and US$24.30/lbs. over the life of the Project.
The Spodumene pricing used in the analysis varies significantly over time. Spodumene concentrate sales total 916 kt, these are assumed to be at concentrate grade of 5.4% lithia for insitu reserves, 5.2% for low grade and fine-grained stockpiles and 4.5% for Tailings.
Production forecasts, including contaminated and non-contaminated ores are shown in Section 13.5. The production from the stockpile reserves is assessed as occurring at the depletion of the insitu reserves. Given the availability of mill capacity future schedules could consider the processing of Stockpile Reserves when capacity exists. The following graph (Figure 19-1) shows the revenue by month over the Life of Mine (LOM) (Green line – referenced to the right scale).
Figure 19-1 – Monthly Project Revenue.
19.4 Capital and Operating Costs
The basis of preparation of the capital and operating costs is described in Chapter 18, as described in that chapter project expenditures do not include contingency amounts or factors.
The cost of transport of concentrate to port and port costs have been included, other freight and sales costs have been incorporated in the realized price of Spodumene.
Goods and Services Tax has not been modelled.
19.5 Other Key Assumptions
The AUD/USD exchange rate applied in the model is 0.70 (flat, over the LOM) and is an Allkem provided internal forecast.
The financial model uses real 2023 values for revenue and expenditure. No account has been made for price escalation.
The LOM financial model does not include corporate office recharges, business development, exploration, or resource development expenditure.
Income tax expense / payments have not been considered in this model.
Project funding, including working capital, has not been considered in preparing this financial model, mainly because the project is operating and is cash positive from the outset. As a result of this, no allowance is made for debt service costs or interest expense. At times, the period cashflow is negative and it is assumed this will be met from retained earnings. Overall, the Project is strongly cashflow positive.
19.5.1 Royalties and Taxes
Two royalties apply to Mt Cattlin and have been included in the economic analysis.
1) | A royalties applied to the production of spodumene is payable to the Western Australian (WA) State Government. The royalty is applied at a rate of 5% on the revenue realized from the sale of spodumene concentrate. The exchange rate applied for this royalty is set by DMIRS. |
2) | A royalty payment of US$1.05 per tonne of ore crushed is paid to Lithium Royalty Corp. |
19.5.2 Corporate Tax
The economic analysis has been prepared on a pre and post-tax basis and tax has been applied to the model at the federal company tax rate payable to the Australian Taxation Office of 30%. This tax has been incorporated into the economic analysis, without allowance for depreciation, carried forward losses, credits or offsets.
19.6 Project Free Cashflow and Net Present Value
The Project cashflow as shown by mine stage in Table 19-2 and then by month in Figure 19-2 assumes there is no opening cash on hand at the start of the Project. LOM total net cash flow is US$1,113 m over the period from 1 July 2023 to November 2028 (mine closure).
The Net Present Value (NPV) of the pre-tax cashflows are US$947 m using a discount rate of 10.0%.
The post tax NPV is US$614m using a discount rate of 10%.
Open pit mining continues until July 2027, ore deliveries to the ROM pad are lumpy, building stockpiles initially before it is drawn to zero, a small stockpile is built again in the third year before depletion and again in year 5.
The reserves (those mined from pit) are processed at a rate of 1.8Mtpa when ore is available until December 2027 when the pit reserve material is exhausted, thereafter the “Stockpile reserves” are treated. The Stockpiles are treated sequentially, firstly Low Grade, then Tailings then Fine-Grained ore stockpiles, at a rate of 1.8Mtpa. The reserves are fully depleted in October 2028.
19.6.1 Project Cashflows by Pit Stage
All stages of the Project are cashflow positive, however the metrics between the stages, and that of the overall Project average are markedly different. In the current mine, Stage 3 is effectively pre-stripped by past operations and is now entering a period of very strong cash generation shown by the steep ramp up in the cumulative cash balance curve in Figure 19-2. The first phase of the Stage 4 expansion, Stage 4-1 requires a
large waste stripping program to access the down-dip portion of the upper pegmatite and to expose the lower pegmatite, and at times the mill will be ore constrained, limiting cash generation during the phase of high expenditure (as referred to in refer to Chapter 13). A similar pattern is seen in Stage 4-2 and Figure 19-2 shows a long period of flat cumulative cash balance, before a late accumulation as Stage 4-2 and the closure stockpiles deliver sustained positive cash flows.
Table 19-2 – Project Cashflow by Stages.
Cashflow (US$m) | Stage 3 | Stage 4-1 | Stage 4-2 | Stockpiles | Total |
Gross Revenue | 993.7 | 325.9 | 591.3 | 181.2 | 2,092.00 |
Capital Expenditure | 28.4 | 7.3 | 8.9 | 35.6 | 80.3 |
Operating Expenditure | 176.6 | 237.2 | 403.5 | 81.2 | 898.5 |
Total Cashflow | 788.7 | 81.3 | 178.9 | 64.3 | 1,113.20 |
Figure 19-2 – Period Revenue and Costs, and Cumulative Cash Balance.
19.6.2 Project Cashflows Annually
Annual Cashflows are shown below in Table 19-3.
Table 19-3 – Annual Cashflows represented in US$m.
Annual Cashflow (US$m) | Total LOM | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Capex | 80.3
|
20.7 | 6.9
|
2.9 | 36.6 | 0.7 | 12.5 |
Mining | 431.4 | 91.3 | 107.4 | 108.7 | 124 | 0 | 0 |
Transport | 37 | 11.5 | 8.7 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 8.3 | 1.1 |
Processing | 254.5 | 50.2 | 47.9 | 33.4 | 41.9 | 59 | 22 |
G&A | 65.2 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 4.1 |
Royalty & Refining | 110.4 | 43.9 | 20.8 | 5.7 | 13.4 | 23.5 | 3 |
Total Costs | 978.9 | 229.9 | 204 | 165.8 | 232.7 | 103.8 | 42.7 |
Gross Revenue | 2,092.10 | 843.8 | 385.5 | 103.1 | 246.3 | 452.9 | 60.5 |
FCF | 1,113.20 | 613.9 | 181.5 | -62.7 | 13.5 | 349.1 | 17.8 |
Corporate Tax @ 30% | 352.8 | 184.2 | 54.5 | 0 | 4.1 | 104.7 | 5.4 |
Post-Tax Cashflow | 760.4 | 429.7 | 127.1 | -62.7 | 9.5 | 244.4 | 12.5 |
19.7 Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis was conducted on the following variables (+/-20%) and quantified with the financial model on pre-tax Free Cashflow (FCF) and Net Present Value (NPV) outputs:
● | Revenue factors: |
○ | Spodumene concentrate price |
○ | Currency exchange rate |
○ | Process plant recovery |
● | Cost factors: |
○ | Mining operating costs |
○ | Processing operating costs. |
Being an operating mine, capital costs are relatively minor, <10%, of project expenditures, and were not tested by sensitivity given the expectation of immateriality on project economics (i.e., 20% of US$80.3m is ~2% of the post-tax NPV).
The results are graphically summarized in Figure 19-3 and Figure 19-4 for cashflow, correspondingly in Figure 19-5 and Table 19-4 for NPV, which is also shown as relative changes in Table 19-5
The outputs show the expected heightened sensitivity to revenue factors compared to cost factors. The plant recovery and revenue trends mimic each other, and currency exchange rate is the inverse. The cost sensitivity trends of the mining and processing operating costs mimic each other with mining being somewhat more influential on cashflow and NPV due to being a larger overall cost.
Figure 19-3 – Cashflow Sensitivity to Key Revenue and Cost Factor Variables.
Figure 19-4 – Cashflow Sensitivity to Key Revenue and Cost Factor Variables.
Table 19-4 – Cashflow Sensitivity (US$m).
Item/ Range | Unit | -20% | -10% | 0% | 10% | 20% |
FX | US$m | 1,565 | 1,314 | 1,113 | 949 | 812 |
Revenue | US$m | 716 | 914 | 1,113 | 1,312 | 1,511 |
Mill recovery | US$m | 769 | 941 | 1,113 | 1,285 | 1,457 |
Mining operating cost | US$m | 1,199 | 1,156 | 1,113 | 1,070 | 1,027 |
Processing operating cost | US$m | 1,164 | 1,139 | 1,113 | 1,088 | 1,062 |
Figure 19-5 – NPV Sensitivity to Key Revenue and Cost Factor Variables.
Table 19-5 – NPV Sensitivity (US$M).
Item/ Range | Unit | -20% | -10% | 0% | 10% | 20% |
Currency exchange rate | US$M | 1,330 | 1,117 | 947 | 808 | 693 |
Revenue | US$M | 619 | 783 | 947 | 1,112 | 1,276 |
Mill recovery | US$M | 658 | 803 | 947 | 1,092 | 1,237 |
Mining operating cost | US$M | 1,018 | 983 | 947 | 912 | 877 |
Processing operating cost | US$M | 987 | 967 | 947 | 928 | 908 |
Table 19-6 – Relative changes to pretax cashflows with % changes to key inputs.
Parameter | Unit | -20% | -10% | 0% | 10% | 20% |
Currency exchange rate | % | 140 | 118 | 100 | 85 | 73 |
Revenue | % | 65 | 83 | 100 | 117 | 135 |
Mill recovery | % | 69 | 85 | 100 | 115 | 131 |
Mining operating cost | % | 107 | 104 | 100 | 96 | 93 |
Processing operating cost | % | 104 | 102 | 100 | 98 | 96 |
The pit staging as applied in this assessment (e.g., Stage 3, Stage 4-1, Stage 4-2) individually have quite different stripping ratios, ore capture, and occur at times of quite different forecast product prices. Therefore, the risk characteristics of the individual stages is quite different to the overall Project average as shown below in Table 19-7.
Table 19-7 – Comparative Risk Metrics – Stage vs. Overall.
Pit Stage | Strip Ratio w:o (t) |
Concentrate % of Total (t) |
Revenue % of Total (US$) |
Cost % of Total (US$) |
Cashflow % of
Total (%)
|
Stage 3 | 3.5 | 37 | 47 | 21 | 71 |
Stage 4-1 | 31.1 | 22 | 16 | 25 | 7 |
Stage 4-2 | 29.5 | 30 | 28 | 42 | 16 |
Closure Stockpiles | n/a | 10 | 9 | 12 | 6 |
Overall | 21.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Stripping Ratio can be a useful consideration in economic risk assessment. Stage 3 has a stripping ratio of 3.5:1, whilst Stage 4-1 and 4-2 are both approximately 30:1 (the overall Project LOM stripping ratio is 20:1). Clearly the two Stage 4 phases carry more risk and are more sensitive to variations in assumptions and actual performance than Stage 3, as can be clearly seen in the cashflow contributions relative to the cost burden.
19.8 Summary Economic Analysis
The Key financial results are shown in Table 19-8.
Table 19-8 – Key Financial Results.
Description | Value |
Revenue from concentrate (US$m) | 2,092 |
Total operating costs over the LOM (life of mine US$m) | 899 |
Total Site Cash Cost (life of mine US$m) | 979 |
C1 cash operating cost (US$M) | 788 |
All in sustaining cash cost (US$M) | 932 |
LOM net cash flow (undiscounted US$M) | 1,113 |
LOM post tax cashflow (undiscounted US$M) | 760 |
The pre-tax NPV using a discount rate of 10% (US$M) | 947 |
The post-tax NPV using a discount rate of 10% (US$M) | 614 |
The pre-tax NPV using a discount rate of 8% (US$M) | 975 |
The post-tax NPV using a discount rate of 8% (US$M) | 638 |
Average Spodumene price over LOM (US/dmt) | 2,271 |
Average Tantalite price over LOM (US/lbs.) | 24.3 |
Mt Cattlin produces spodumene and tantalite concentrates for sale. The concentrate revenue has been modelled on a Realized Price basis (i.e., net of all penalties and/or grade discounts, Free-on-board Esperance, WA) using data supplied by Allkem.
Operations are modelled from July 2023 and through to mine closure in November 2028 and producing 916kt of Li2O concentrates and 1.6Mlbs of Ta205 in concentrates which are sold for US$2,092m.
All in cash costs are US$979M, free before tax cashflows total US$1,113m.
The pre-tax NPV of the project, using the supplied economic assumptions from 1 July 2023 is US$947M. Post tax NPV is US$614m.
As an existing operation, the project has no construction or pre-production period.
All pit stages and years of operation are cashflow positive, the final year of operations treating the stockpiles is also cashflow positive.
The third year of operations, being year ending June 30, 2026, is the only year showing a negative cashflow, resulting from low revenues and ore feed during the year whilst high waste movement continues in stage 4- 2. The negative cashflows in this year could be comfortably funded by high cashflows from prior years and the total stage 4-2 is demonstrated to have a positive overall cashflow.
Sensitivity testing shows that the project NPV remains positive under testing, including:
● | 20% increases in mining or processing costs. |
● | 20% decline in revenues (prices), or processing recovery. |
● | 20% adverse move in the AUD:USD exchange rate. |
It is recommended that Allkem develop a more sophisticated tax model for future Economic Analysis including incorporating carried forward losses and depreciation.
20. ADJACENT PROPERTIES
Mt Cattlin is the only known major lithium / tantalum deposit in the Ravensthorpe region. Allkem holds most of the adjacent exploration tenements that surround the mining lease. No other lithium operations are in production in the Ravensthorpe district.
Occurrences of copper and gold mineralization are known from within the Mt Cattlin mining lease and on adjacent properties, and they have been the subject of historic, small-scale mining. The most important of these are the following (Witt, 1998):
● | Mt Cattlin gold-copper mine located 1 km east-south-east of the Mt Cattlin lithium deposit |
● | Marion Martin 1.5 km to the south |
● | Floater 1.5 km to the north |
● | Maori Queen 3.5 km to the northeast. |
Traka Resources is actively exploring for economic gold and copper mineralization on exploration lease E74/401. Various open file government reports quote small remnant, non-compliant copper-gold resources for these properties.
Tenement G74/13 was awarded on 26 May 2023 on Allkem owned freehold, for 21 years as part of the Stage 4 expansion. Tenement E 74/621 expires on 15 August 2023.
The tenement map in Figure 20-1 shows the Allkem Galaxy tenement holdings relevant to the adjacent properties.
Figure 20-1 – Tenement Map Showing Properties Adjacent to the Mt Cattlin Tenements.
21. OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION
There is no other relevant data or information material to Mt Cattlin that has not been documented in the other Chapters of this Technical Report.
22. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS
This report has been prepared by Mining Plus and the Allkem employee set forth herein in accordance with the guidelines set forth in S-K 1300. Its objective is to disclose the current Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves for the Project and evaluate the economic viability of the Project.
22.1 Conclusion
The QPs have weighed the potential benefits and risks presented in the Report and found the Project to have reasonable economic viability for the stated Mineral Reserves under S-K 1300 guidelines.
22.2 Project Risks
The Project is at advanced-staged production and has demonstrated operational performance history, tenure and permitting within the project area and much of the required infrastructure in-situ.
A number of key risk issues are highlighted:
● | The timely permitting of: |
○ | Approval of Stage 4-1 pit and waste dump permitting. Delays is this permitting would risk the production schedule. |
○ | Northeast Pit for receiving tailings is considered a key risk to the production schedule. |
● | Provision of water for processing once NE pit is receiving tailings. |
● | The permitting of waste dump 4 should it be needed requires an EPA process, due to the amount of vegetation clearing required, including additional base line surveys. |
● | The metallurgical performance of NW Stage 4 is based on limited testwork at time of reserve generation and further test work will be required. |
22.3 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Test work
Mt Cattlin ore is processed using conventional processing techniques to produce spodumene and by-product tantalite concentrates, through the processing plant.
Processing consists of multi-stage crushing, screening, optical sorting, DMS and gravity concentration to produce concentrate.
Historical processing performance is used as the basis for making recovery projections used the reserves and economic study of NW Stage 4 area which is the focus of this report. Whilst it is a reasonable assumption, based on geometallurgical understanding, that the performance will continue into the stage 4 area there was limited specific testwork at the time of this reporting. Additional metallurgical drillholes have been drilled into this area and were awaiting results and analysis at the time of this report.
22.4 Operating and Capital Costs
Total LOM operating cost for the Project is estimated at US$899m, based on the production schedule, and incorporates all surface mining, transport, processing, G&A, and royalty costs. The operating costs have been prepared without contingency or escalation.
Total LOM capital cost for the Project is estimated at US$80.3m. The capital cost has been prepared without contingency or escalation.
Mining Costs have been developed from the pricing of a preferred tender for the Stage 4 mining contracts. Other operating costs have been derived from historic site costs and benchmarks.
The estimate is developed on a June 2023 basis using native currencies for all costs (predominately Australian dollars) and then converted to US dollars.
22.5 Geology and Mineral Resource Estimate
A Mineral Resource was prepared in accordance with the standard definitions of S-K 1300.
● | Geological information is being collected routinely within the active pits. Mine Geologists are mapping bench faces where possible logging blasthole drillholes. |
● | The geological setting and complexity are well understood. The pegmatites are offset and juxtaposed relative to each other by numerous late-stage faults. Several large dolerite dykes and dyke swarms intersect and stope the pegmatites. |
● | The Mineral Resource estimation has been undertaken within detailed geologically controlled wireframes. Mineralized pegmatite wireframes have been generated in Leapfrog Geo modelling software at a cut-off of 0.3% Li2O. The majority of drillhole samples have been drilled by Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling methods and sampled at a length of 1 m. Compositing has been undertaken at a length of 1 m. Modelling has been undertaken in Leapfrog Geo and Leapfrog Edge using Na20 to wireframe out finer grained pegmatite. No top-cuts have been applied to. A variographic analysis has determined variographic parameters for use in the estimation, with domains which contain too few composites either grouped for variographic analysis or assigned variographic parameters from other domains. The estimation has been undertaken within hard boundary domains using ordinary kriging at the scale of the parent block. The block model validates well compared to the input composite data, with the majority of domains being within +/- 10% relative difference. The Mineral Resource has been classified on the basis of geological and grade continuity, and data support. The estimate has been depleted for mining as of 30 June 2023. |
● | The geological and assay data used as input to the Mineral Resource Estimate have been collected, interpreted, and estimated in line with best practice as defined by the CIM (CIM 2018, 2019). Data verification work undertaken by Mining Plus identified minor errors, however, these have not materially impacted the accuracy of the Mineral Resource Estimate. It is of the opinion of Albert Thamm (QP) that the CIM best practice guidelines comply with the S-K 1300 regulations and therefore the data is deemed suitable for use in the estimation of Mineral Resources. Monthly and end-of-pit |
reconciliations display good agreement between the 2022-3 mill-reconciled production tonnes and grades when compared to the equivalent tonnes and grades reported out of the December 2022 MRE block model and GC block models. |
● | The key risk to the operation is the loss of pegmatite mineralization due to dolerite dyke stoping in areas of wide-spaced drilling. In addition, xenolith protoliths stoped from the pegmatite hanging wall are known, as are internal zones of either barren pegmatite, metasomatically altered pegmatite and fine-grained pegmatite. Other significant risks or uncertainties could reasonably be expected to affect the reliability or confidence in the drilling information or Mineral Resource Estimate include late-stage alteration to non-spodumene bearing mineralogies. |
22.6 Mineral Reserve Estimate
The Mineral Reserves were prepared in accordance with the standards and definitions of S-K 1300.
The 2023 Mineral Resource model was used for pit optimization and design using industry standard software with inputs for modifying factors, geotechnical slope parameters, mining and operating costs, grade and mass recoveries and economic parameters to determine the optimal pit limits. This formed the basis of the final design and scheduling of the mine.
Inferred resources have not been included in the economic evaluation.
There has been a history of conversion of Inferred to Indicated Resources resulting in additional Resources from outside the Mineral Reserve being included into the life of mine (LOM) plan, which has the potential to improve the Project economics. There is a small quantity of mineralization outside the 2022 Mineral Resource Estimate that lies within the designed pits. This material is excluded from the 2023 Mineral Reserve Estimate; however, it is included in the LOM Plan
Mt Cattlin has demonstrated an ability to improve the mining method and productivity by continuing to collect geological information and therefore improving the geological understanding of the deposit and thus the mine designs and planning.
Mt Cattlin continues to reconcile local grade control models against the un-diluted Mineral Resource, the diluted Ore Reserve to improve forecasting.
22.7 Mining Methods
Mining will be undertaken using typical drill and blast operations with hydraulic excavator(s) and dump trucks. All mining and associated activities are planned to be undertaken by a mining contractor using conventional open pit mining methods.
The mine is planned for 10m high benches extending to 220m below surface with an overall strip ratio of 20:1. The life of mine (LOM) schedule is planned for operation until mid-2027.
As the operation is located close to the town of Ravensthorpe, strict noise emission limitations ultimately effect the overall size of the fleet and the size of the individual items of machinery. Sensitive noise receptors, located to the south of the mine, require a waste dumping sequence that builds a southern noise barrier, and then progresses dumping northwards. Wind direction can have a significant short-term effect on the perception of noise and must be managed by daily scheduling flexibility.
High strip ratios and ramp access will occasionally limit the production rate due to a practical bench turnover constraint and limited working space. The mining sequence must be executed in order from the existing Stage 3 to Stage 4-1, and then onto the final Stage 4-2. There are several factors influencing the sequence, including managing the interface between the current active pit/s and the cutbacks, access to feed material, and minimum working area.
Due to the constraints placed on the mining sequence with integrating the existing Stage 3 pit, permitting approval timelines, practical bench turnover rates, practical vertical advance, and high stripping ratios, the process plant does not always have ore available at the nominal capacity.
22.8 Infrastructure
As an operating brownfields site, much of the required infrastructure is already in-situ with respect to site access, roads, processing infrastructure, tailings storage and waste dumps and access to shipping facilities. There will be some modifications to site access roads as the mine and the waste dump expands, and the construction of a floatation circuit to the existing DMS, however this has been accounted for within the Report and findings.
The site has an adequate supply of power, water and other services required for the current operation, however as the current NE pit is planned for tailings deposition, additional water sources will be required. Return water is planned to be sourced from the NE IPTSF, this will utilize a new method, bore established at the base of the tailings, but drawing on experience gained from tailings behavior at site.
An additional make-up water source will also be required, an alternative water source. Drilling is underway to source this water.
A drilling program is currently underway; however, water availability remains a key project risk until this alternative water source is shored up.
22.9 Environmental, Social and Permitting
Key interpretation and conclusions are:
● | Mt Cattlin has completed numerous baseline environmental studies (during and prior to operations) and all key studies have been completed and there are no ongoing constraints preventing ongoing development and mining. Waste Dump 4 will require additional baseline studies and permitting prior to the dump being developed. |
● | Mt Cattlin has obtained all relevant permits required for current operations. |
● | At the date of reporting reserves Mt Cattlin was in compliance with all permits. |
● | A Mining Proposal has been lodged with the regulator (DMIRS) for the development of Stage 4-1 pit and additional waste dumping; this approval is seeking the expansion of the pit and relocation of the SW tailings. Approval was considered routine and was expected in August 2023. |
● | A new Mining Proposal will need to be submitted following the receipt of the approval for the currently lodged proposal, to permit the use of NE pit IPTSF. The highest priority is the new NE IPTSF as the current TSF will reach capacity in mid-2024. The new TSF will be the third similar style of TSF at Mt Cattlin and therefore is not a novel concept. Whilst the approval should be relatively straightforward and non-controversial, the time remaining to design and gain the approval, inclusive of any intermediate delays or required changes of scope, could elevate the risk to production given the expected exhaustion of tailings capacity in the SE pit IPTSF in mid-2024. |
● | A further Mining Proposal process will commence upon the successful receipt of the currently lodged Mining Proposal discussed above, to provide optionality for the project whilst the technical, economic, and social trade-offs of a pit cut-back for Stage 4-2 and/or an underground operation are assessed as the most appropriate mining methodology. Should open pit mining of Stage 4-2 ultimately be decided on by Allkem and further waste dumping space to the Northeast be required then an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) referral will be required. The EPA referral is required as the area being considered for extra waste dumping would require clearing a significant area of native vegetation. |
● | Other Stage 4 capital projects, such as the development of a dedicated staff village on freehold, a new and modernized power supply, and groundwater abstraction will require a series of new and/or altered Works Approvals or modifications to Licenses, issued by the WA State Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER). |
● | Allkem do not believe that there are constraints that will prevent permitting. Mt Cattlin has no known environmental liabilities other than rehabilitation/ closure obligations. |
● | Mt Cattlin is required to pay a per hectare unit rate for land disturbance as part of the Mining Rehabilitation Fund Regulations 2013. |
● | The closure and rehabilitation of the site post operations is prescribed in the Mine Closure Plan prepared in accordance with the Department of Mining, Industry, Regulation and Safety and outlines the closure obligations. The Mine Closure Plan identifies and sets out management of any potential closure issues and defines and outlines the site rehabilitation requirements. |
● | Mt Cattlin has focused on mine scheduling that allows for progressive rehabilitation to all disturbed land during operations. Annual rehabilitation monitoring is conducted on site and a detailed Closure Cost Estimate (CCE) is completed annually. An updated Mine Closure Plan has been submitted with the current Mining Proposal which estimates a closure cost of US$12.6m. |
● | Mt Cattlin has built up social credit with the local community over the past decade through local employment, operating without major incident, and initiatives such as the Community Consultation Group (CCG) and site Open Days. |
22.10 Market Studies
Lithium market studies have been sourced via Allkem from independent consulting group, Wood Mackenzie, providing market supply and demand analysis and lithium price forecasts.
Forecast global demand for lithium is strong with continued growth projections to 2050 due to an increase in requirement for battery technologies, particularly within the automotive industries, which has seen a 69% growth since 2020.
Allkem’s shipments of spodumene concentrate are contracted on a spot basis to meet customers under existing off-take agreements.
22.11 Economic Analysis
An economic evaluation was completed for the life of the project, with an estimated a pre-tax NPV of US$947m (discounted at 10%) and a post-tax NPV of US$614m. This analysis was derived from the mining and processing schedule based on the Mineral Reserves and the associated mining, processing, transport, G&A, and royalty costs. This analysis excludes provision for sunk capital and does not provide for GST, withholding taxes, escalation and inflation, interest, or financial charges.
The estimate is developed on a 2023 basis using native currencies for all costs (predominately Australian dollars) and then converted to US dollars at an exchange rate of AUD:USD = 0.70.
A sensitivity analysis was completed with the greatest NPV sensitivity being to revenue (commodity price) and processing recoveries. Testing the pre-tax cashflows at 20% adverse moves to key inputs showed the cashflows and NPV’s remained positive.
23. RECOMMENDATIONS
23.1 Introduction
This Chapter contains a summary of key works required to implement stage 4 and opportunities that may be instituted in the future to optimize and/or further extend the life of the Mt Cattlin Project.
23.2 Environmental Studies and Permitting
The diligent management, including timely submission of permits is required to achieve the production schedules in this report, notably:
● | The current Mining Proposal submitted for approval with DMIRS only considers Stages 4-1 of the proposed mine plan. |
● | The highest priority next regulatory approval needed is to operate the planned North-East In-Pit Tailings Storage facility (which is currently being used as a water aggregation ‘dam’) and associated infrastructure. A new Mining Proposal will be submitted to permit these activities. |
● | In order to continue with either Stage 4-2 and/or a transition to underground mining, a further Mining Proposal will be required, this proposal will also have to incorporate the construction of additional waste dumping capacity should more open pit mining be contemplated, the current Mining Proposal will only accommodate Stage 4-1 waste). If the Stage 4-2 open pits are developed, then EPA approval will be required for additional for vegetation clearing additional waste dumping. Timely decision making and commencement of required studies and submissions will be required to avoid impact to the project schedule. |
● | Additional and/or amended permits will also be required to construct a new power facility, as well as the accommodation village noted in the recommendations. |
● | Complete drilling to source alternative water source and subsequent permitting for processing operations to provide processing to water currently sourced from the NE Pit, which is scheduled for use as IPTSF in 2024. This source of water remains a key project risk until alternate sources of water are available. |
23.3 Geology and Mineral Resource
Allkem has an active exploration and sterilization drilling program in place as the Mineral Resource is currently drilling constrained. Grade control specific drilling has been used intermittently under the direction of the Exploration Manager. Opportunity exists to imbed dedicated grade control definition into the mining cycle to address risk of short-term ore mismatches with the resource model. Grade control drilling is scheduled for calendar 2023, the remainder program for 2023 is expected to cost US350k.
The Mineral Resource remains open at depth to the NW and to the SW at shallower depths.
To support underground studies, further geotechnical and metallurgical drilling is recommended.
Further resource estimation work, incorporating the 2023 grade control drilling should investigate fine grade pegmatite with lithia grade above cut-off, for either end of mine processing or blending into ore grade stockpiles to maintain process plant nameplate run rates while meeting product specifications.
Continue to develop geo-metallurgical grade control techniques to define and segregate fine grained spodumene for future processing. Further resource estimation work, incorporating the 2023 grade control drilling should investigate fine grade pegmatite with lithia grade above cut-off, for either end of mine processing or blending into ore grade stockpiles to maintain process plant nameplate run rates while meeting product specifications.
Continue resource drilling to further expand the resource and define the limits of mineralization. An 8,000 m combined reverse circulation and diamond tail program has been proposed for FY 2024. This is costed at US$1.75m.
23.4 Processing and Metallurgy
Evaluate the results of the 4 additional metallurgical drillholes and associated testing to quantify the continuity of the mineralization and recovery expectations for the bulk of the Stage 4 expansion.
Progress the business case for processing the potential low grade fine grained spodumene.
Further expand the current study level of the tailings re-treatment to sure up processing and support forecast capital expenditure of additional floatation cells to process the tailings.
Progress the business case for processing the potential low grade fine grained spodumene.
Further expand the current study level of the 2018 tailings re-treatment to sure up processing and support forecast capital expenditure of for floatation to process the tailings.
23.5 Crushing Circuit Recommissioning
The original Mt Cattlin crushing circuit was decommissioned when the plant went into care and maintenance during 2013 and was not recommissioned when the plant was restarted in 2016 due to the capital cost involved, relative to the Spodumene concentrate sales price at the time. Since that time, a permanent contact crushing contractor has been in place on site, and whilst giving generally good service, is relatively expensive. Given the mine life extension proposition of this Feasibility Study, a project to re-institute the fixed plant crushing circuit has been initiated, with a view to assessing the suitability of the current plant capacity and commissioning a facility that can serve Mt Cattlin’s life of mine needs.
23.6 Flotation Circuit
A test work program to investigate the potential of retreating tailings stockpiles to extract residual lithium is underway. This test work program has had encouraging results, and the potential business case deserves evaluation as the technical program concludes. The cost of studies is incorporated within the capital cost.
23.7 Tailings
The current South-East In-Pit Tailings Storage facility will reach capacity in mid-2024 or possibly sooner. At this point tailings deposition will need to be transferred to the North-East Pit. In order to accommodate this shift, permitting and preparatory works need to be completed as a priority. These works include establishing and protecting the future tailings lines through the area that is soon to be used in the expansion of Waste Dump #1. The cost of these is included in processing operating and Tailing capital cost assumptions.
23.8 Hydrogeology and Water Management
To maintain adequate water supply to the site process plant, recycled TSF decant water is pumped from the current North-East pit through a decant line back to the processing plant. When this pit it converted to being used as a Tailings Storage Facility in 2024 the cleanliness and easy access to this water will be disrupted. In preparation, bore casings need to be installed from the top of the adjacent waste dump to tap into this resource and allow pumping the of “return water” from the tailings, Allkem’s experience in tailings properties and rock backfill provides confidence that the methodology will be effective in recovering return water. Additional water will need to be sourced to “make up” the plant treatment requirements. A planned drilling program to identify potential alternative water sources on the mining site is soon to commence.
23.9 Infrastructure and Services
Consolidation of the village accommodation, adopting a hybrid power station are not currently part of the capital works included in the Feasibility Study and the evaluation of this report.
23.9.1 Hybrid Power Station
The current site power supply of multiple diesel fueled generators, while fit for purpose, is relatively expensive and has comparatively large carbon emissions compared to similar sized alternative fuel power sources. A project to replace or supplement the current plant with a hybrid natural gas / renewable energy installation is underway, with an expected timeline of 12-15 months.
23.9.2 Village Accommodation
To consolidate the Mt Cattlin workforce and reduce the reliance on multiple third-party accommodation sources, Allkem have commenced the process of constructing their own accommodation village for Allkem staff and primary contractors. The village has had a Development Approval application submitted, a tender for the accommodation and central facility modules let, and planning for utilities and construction has commenced. A low accuracy cost estimate of a new village is US$21m.
23.10 Mining
Strengthen the QA/ QC processes with the Mining Models.
Continue to evaluate the Mining Model performance against site reconciliation results.
Progress geotechnical trials of pit wall control techniques e.g., presplitting to demonstrate the case for safer and steeper wall angles.
Continue to investigate underground mining methods as an alternative to open pit mining as the strip ratio increases and analyze a tradeoff between open pit and underground mining transition.
A Feasibility study to investigate the viability of developing the resource as an underground mine was commissioned in May 2023.
This study is being completed by Orelogy Mine Consulting with the intention of having a finalized study document by January 2024. The goal of this study is to determine if there is value in changing mining methodology prior to committing to open pit extraction of the Stage 4-2 pit, and to determine the required infrastructure modifications that would be associated with such a change. The estimated cost of the study is US$525k.
The scheduling of the Stockpile Reserves should be considered to take advantage of the available mill capacity when the ex-pit ores are unavailable.
23.11 Economic Modelling
The economic modelling taxation model does not account for carried forward losses or depreciation. It is recommended that a more sophisticated tax model is employed in future economic analysis.
Future economic modelling should also consider the opportunity to process Stockpile Reserves when there is mill capacity available.
Further develop capital estimates for the floatation circuit (retreating historic tailings) and the removal of the tailings from the 2SWIPTSF.
The remainder of the program is to be carried out as per normal operational execution.
24. REFERENCES
Allkem Limited. (2023, June 16). AKE Mt Cattlin Ore Reserves update confirmsmine life extension. Retrieved from https://www.allkem.co/investors/asx-announcements
Allkem Limited. (2023). Mt Cattlin Resource Update with Higher Grade. Australian Stock Exchange (ASX).
Bieniawski, Z. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classifications. New York: Wiley.
Broomfield, D. P. (1990). Cattlin Creek ML74/12 – PL74/139. Annual Report.
Cameron, E. & Ross, J. (1963). Ravensthorpe Pegamatite. Western mining Corporation Limited.
Dempers & Seymour. (2008). Mt Cattlin Pit Slope Design Final Report. Unpublished.
Entech. (2023). Mt Cattlin Ore Reserve Update. Unpublished.
Entech. (2023). Mt Cattlin Stage 4 Expansion Feasibility Study. Unpublished.
Grubb, P. L. (1963). Spodumene from Ravensthorpe and Mt Marion, WA. Mineralogical and Chemical Study.
CSIRO Mineragraphic Investigation, Report No. 871.
Hellman & Schofield. (2009). Mt Cattlin MIneral Resource. Allkem LImited.
London, D. (2008). Pegmatites. Mineralogical Association of Canada.
Mining Plus Pty Ltd. (2021). NI 43-101 Technical Report, Mt Cattlin Spodumene Project, Ravensthopre, Western Australia. Allkem Limited.
Mining Plus Pty Ltd. (2023). Mt Cattlin JORC MRE: Mineral Resource Estimation for Allkem Limited.
Unpublished.
Sofoulis, J. (1958). Report on Cattlin Creek spodumene pegmatite, Raventhorpe, PHillips River Goldfields, Western Australia. Western Australian Geological SLurvey, Bulletini 110.
Speirs, R, Peters, J and Lorenzen, L. (2011). Galaxy Resources: Mt Cattlin NI43-101 Technical Report. Snowden Mining Industry Consultants.
Sweetapple, M. (2010). Geochemistry and MIneralogy of the WMC Costeans, and diamond drillholes GXD02, GMCGTDO2 and GMCTDO3, Mt Cattlin Spodumene Project, Weestern Australia. CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering - Restricted Report.
Sweetapple, M. (2010). Pegmatite-Hosted Lithium Resources of Australia: A Review of Characteristics and Exploration. 13th IAGOD Symposium Volume, Giant Ore Deposits Downunder Conference (pp. 319- 320). Adelaide: CSIRO Division of Earth Sciences and Resource Engineering.
Wells, A. M. (2022). MRIWA Report M532 - The Geology, Mineralogy and Geometallurgy of EV Matrerials Deposits in Western Australia. Perth: The Geological Survey of Western Australia.
Witt, W. (1998). Geology and Mineral Resources of the Ravensthorpe and Cocanarup 1:1000,000 sheets.
Western Australian Geological Survey.
Wood Mackenzie. (2023). Global lithium strategic planning outlook - Q1 2023. Unpublished.
Young. (2005). Cattlin Creek Project Annual Report for the Period 22 July 2004 to 21 July 2005. Haddington Resources.
25. RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT
The QPs have relied on information provided by Allkem (the registrant), including expert reports, in preparing its findings and conclusions with respect to this report.
The QPs consider it reasonable to rely on Allkem for this information as Allkem obtained opinions from appropriate experts with regards to such information, as described in Table 25-1.
Table 25-1 – Expert Contributors.
Chapter | Title | Source | Source Material |
3 | Property Description and Location | Allkem Limited | NI-43101 Technical
Report Mt Cattlin JORC MRE |
4 | Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography | Allkem Limited | NI-43101 Technical
Report Mt Cattlin JORC MRE |
5 | History | Allkem Limited | NI-43101 Technical
Report Mt Cattlin JORC MRE |
6 | Geological Setting, Deposit and Mineralization | Allkem Limited | Mt Cattlin JORC
MRE |
7 | Exploration | Allkem Limited | Mt Cattlin JORC MRE |
8 | Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security | Allkem Limited | Mt Cattlin JORC MRE |
9 | Data Verification | Allkem Limited | Mt Cattlin JORC MRE |
10 | Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing | Allkem, Entech | Mt Cattlin Stage 4
Feasibility Study NI-43101 Technical Report |
11 | Mineral Resource Estimate | Allkem Limited | NI-43101 Technical
Report Block model and wireframes |
12 | Mineral Reserve estimates | Allkem
Limited, Entech |
Mt Cattlin Stage 4
Feasibility Study NI-43101 Technical Report |
13 | Mining Methods | Mining
Plus Pty Ltd., Entech |
Mt Cattlin Stage 4
Feasibility Study NI-43101 Technical Report |
14 | Processing and Recovery methods | Entech,
Strategic Metallurgy |
Mt Cattlin Stage 4
Feasibility Study NI-43101 Technical Report |
15 | Project Infrastructure | Allkem Limited | Mt Cattlin Stage 4
Feasibility Study NI-43101 Technical Report |
16 | Market Studies and Contracts | Wook
McKenzie, Allkem Limited |
NI-43101 Technical
Report Global Lithium Strategic Planning Outlook |
17 | Environmental studies, permitting and social community impact, Negotiations, Contracts with local communities and groups | Allkem Limited | |
18 | Capital and Operating Costs | Entech | Mt Cattlin Stage 4
Feasibility Study NI-43101 Technical Report Mt Cattlin Economic Model |
19 | Economic Analysis | Allkem Limited | Mt Cattlin Stage 4
Feasibility Study NI-43101 Technical Report Mt Cattlin Economic Model |
20 | Adjacent properties | Allkem Limited |
26. SIGNATURE PAGE
CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT for Mining Plus Pty Ltd.
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of Chapters 1–2 (shared), Chapter 10, Chapter 12-14, Chapter 16, Chapters 18-19, and Chapters 22- 25 (shared) in the “SEC Technical Report Summary, Mt Cattlin Lithium Project” the (“Technical Report Summary”) performed by Mining Plus Pty Ltd. in its capacity as an independent consultant to Allkem Limited, which are set forth in the disclosure requirements for mining registrants promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in accordance with the requirements contained in the S-K §229.1300 to S-K §229.1305 regulations. We further consent to the use of our name in the Technical Report Summary S-K §229.1300.
PERSONAL INSPECTIONS Mining Plus Pty Ltd.: Visited site on July 2022, during this visit the engineer inspected the property, surface topography, areas proposed for the open pit, waste dumps and mine infrastructure.
Effective Date: June 30th, 2023
Signing Date: August 31st, 2023
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR
I, Albert Thamm, F.Aus.IMM, in my individual capacity, do hereby certify that:
1. I have read the definitions of “qualified person” and “relevant
experience” and the related definitions thereto set forth in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Subpart 1300”).
2. I meet all of the qualifications and requirements specified under the definition of “qualified person” set forth in Subpart 1300.
3. I have served as a
“qualified person” pursuant to Subpart 1300 in connection with the technical report summary titled “SEC Technical Report Summary, Mt Cattlin Lithium Project” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of June 30, 2023, prepared for
Allkem Limited (“Allkem”).
4. I am responsible for authoring the following sections of the Technical Report Summary: 1 (co-author), 2 (co-author), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 (co-author), 12 (co-author), 13 (co-author), 14 (co-author), 15, 16 (co-author), 17, 18 (co-author), 19 (co-author), 20, 21, 22 (co-author), 23 (co-author), 24 (co-author), and 25 (co-author).
5. As of the effective date of the Technical Report Summary and as of the date hereof, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report Summary contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report Summary not misleading.
6. I, or a third-party firm comprising mining experts of which I am affiliated, have dated and signed, or will date and sign, both (i) the Technical Report Summary and (ii) the related Consent of Qualified Person, pursuant to Subpart 1300.
Signing Date: August 31st, 2023.
Albert Thamm , F.Aus.IMM
Fellow of the Australasian Institute for Mining and Metallurgy #203217
This report titled “SEC Technical Report Summary, Mt Cattlin Lithium Project” with an effective date of June 30, 2023, was prepared and signed by:
/s/ Mining Plus Pty Ltd.
Mining Plus Pty Ltd.
/s/ Albert Thamm, F.Aus.IMM
Albert Thamm, F.Aus.IMM
309
|
/s/ Gordon Dyal & Co., LLC |
|
Gordon Dyal & Co., LLC |
|
|
|
Dated: September 26, 2023 |
/s/ Robert C. Pallash |
|
Robert C. Pallash
|
/s/ Pablo Marcet |
|
Pablo Marcet
|
/s/ Steven T. Merkt |
|
Steven T. Merkt
|
/s/ Florencia Heredia |
|
Florencia Heredia
|
/s/ Christina Lampe-Önnerud |
|
Christina Lampe-Önnerud
|
/s/ Michael F. Barry |
|
Michael F. Barry
|
/s/ Alan Fitzpatrick |
|
Alan Fitzpatrick
|
/s/ Fernando Oris de Roa |
|
Fernando Oris de Roa
|
/s/ John Turner |
|
John Turner
|
/s/ Leanne Heywood |
|
Leanne Heywood
|