UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
(Mark One)
þ
Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008
 
OR
 
¨
Transition Report pursuant to 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For the transition period                      to                     
 
Commission File Number 0-29901
 
CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Nevada
20-4907818
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 
10019 Canoga Ave
Chatsworth, California 91311
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
818-718-0905
(Issuer’s telephone number,
including area code)
 

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days    YES   þ     NO   ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.):    YES  ¨     NO  þ
 
On February 14, 2009, the registrant had outstanding 28,380,178   shares of Common Stock, which is the registrant’s only class of common equity.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting Company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
     
Large accelerated filer                                              ¨
  
Accelerated filer                    ¨
Non accelerated filer
  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) ¨
  
Smaller reporting company   þ
 
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one):    Yes  ¨     No  þ
 
 
 

 

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
Form 10-Q
For the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2008
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
     
Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
   
       
Item 1.
Financial Statements
   
       
 
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2008
 
4
       
 
Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
 
5
       
 
Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit (Unaudited) for the period from January 29, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2008
 
6
       
 
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
 
7
       
 
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
8
       
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
15
       
Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
20
       
Item 4
Controls and Procedures
 
21
       
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
   
       
Item 1.   Legal Proceedings
 
21
     
Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and use of Proceeds
 
21
     
Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
21
     
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 
21
     
Item 5.   Other Information
 
22
     
Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports
 
22
       
Signatures
   
22
 
 
2

 

Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain statements relating to future results of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. (including certain projections and business trends) that are “forward-looking statements”. Our actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, without limitation, statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates” or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be “forward-looking statements.” Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results or achievements of the Company expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, those set forth herein and those detailed from time to time in our other Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings including those contained in our most recent Form 8-K. Specifically, this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our Form 8-K filed on November 14, 2008, which provided Form 10 type disclosures as required under item 5.06 of Form 8-K. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company disclaims any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

 
3

 

PART I
 
Item 1.    Financial Statements.

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Balance Sheets

   
December 31,
   
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2008
 
   
(unaudited)
       
ASSETS
 
             
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 78,528     $ 310,929  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    2,343       1,445  
      Total current assets
    80,871       312,374  
                 
Property and equipment, net
    23,044       25,306  
Other assets
    9,500       9,500  
      Total assets
  $ 113,415     $ 347,180  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
 
                 
Current liabilities:
               
   Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  $ 91,901     $ 56,706  
   Deferred revenue
    26,000       -  
   Convertible notes payable, net of discounts
    100,798       -  
   Line of credit
    636,917       627,856  
      Total current liabilities
    855,616       684,562  
                 
Commitments and contingencies
               
                 
Stockholders' deficit:
               
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 28,380,178 shares and  18,906,961 shares are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively
    28,380       18,907  
Additional paid-in capital
    3,219,232       2,373,372  
Deficit accumulated during the development stage
    (3,989,813 )     (2,729,661 )
      Total stockholders' deficit
    (742,201 )     (337,382 )
      Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
  $ 113,415     $ 347,180  

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these financial statements
 
 
4

 

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
   
January 29, 2007,
Inception,
Through
 
   
December 31,
   
December 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
 
                               
General and administrative expenses
  $ 660,586     $ 15,451     $ 1,009,532     $ 36,839     $ 1,501,873  
Research and development expenses
    48,671       4,611       178,546       10,228       2,313,360  
Total operating expenses
    709,257       20,062       1,188,078       47,067       3,815,233  
Loss from operations
    (709,257 )     (20,062 )     (1,188,078 )     (47,067 )     (3,815,233 )
Interest expense
    (11,681 )     (11,532 )     (21,318 )     (26,478 )     (75,945 )
Loss before income taxes
    (720,938 )     (31,594 )     (1,209,396 )     (73,545 )     (3,891,178 )
Income tax expense
    -       -       -       -       -  
Net loss
  $ (720,938 )   $ (31,594 )   $ (1,209,396 )   $ (73,545 )   $ (3,891,178 )
 Dividend
    (50,756 )     -       (50,756 )     -       (98,635 )
Net loss available to common stockholders
  $ (771,694 )   $ (31,594 )   $ (1,260,152 )   $ (73,545 )   $ (3,989,813 )
                                         
Net loss available to common stockholders per share:
                                       
Basic and Diluted
  $ (0.03 )   $ (0.00 )     (0.06 )   $ (0.01 )        
                                         
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                                       
Basic and Diluted
    25,805,380       14,331,210       22,356,170       14,331,210          
 
See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these financial statements
 
 
5

 

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit (Unaudited)

   
Common Stock
   
      Additional      
   
Accumulated
       
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Paid-In   Capital
   
Deficit
   
Total
 
                               
Issuance of common stock for services on January 29, 2007, inception
    14,331,210     $ 14,331     $ 6,669     $ -     $ 21,000  
Net loss
                            (533,185 )     (533,185 )
                                         
Balance at December 31, 2007
    14,331,210     $ 14,331     $ 6,669     $ (533,185 )   $ (512,185 )
                                         
Preferred stock sold for cash, as converted
    1,119,199       1,119       498,881               500,000  
Common stock issued as payment for services
    3,456,551       3,457       1,819,943               1,823,400  
Warrants issued in connection with sale of preferred stock
                    47,879       (47,879 )     -  
Net loss
                            (2,148,597 )     (2,148,597 )
                                         
Balance at June 30, 2008
    18,906,961     $ 18,907     $ 2,373,372     $ (2,729,661 )   $ (337,382 )
                                         
Stock option compensation
                    194,030               194,030  
Net loss
                            (488,458 )     (488,458 )
                                         
Balance at September 30, 2008
    18,906,961     $ 18,907     $ 2,567,402     $ (3,218,119 )   $ (631,810 )
                                         
Preferred stock sold for cash, as converted
    279,800       280       124,720               125,000  
Redemption of shares
    (436,761 )     (437 )     437               -  
Bio shares outstanding before reverse merger
    9,280,178       9,280       (9,280 )             -  
Common stock issued as payment for services
    350,000       350       454,250               454,600  
Warrants issued in connection with issuance of convertible debt
                    26,357               26,357  
Dividend resulting from warrants issued in connection with sale of preferred stock, as converted
                    50,756       (50,756 )     -  
Stock option compensation
                    4,590               4,590  
Net loss
                            (720,938 )     (720,938 )
                                         
Balance at December 31, 2008
    28,380,178     $ 28,380     $ 3,219,232     $ (3,989,813 )   $ (742,201 )

 
6

 

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

               
January 29,   2007,
 
               
Inception,
 
               
Through
 
   
Six Months Ended December 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
 
                   
Operating activities:
                 
Net loss
  $ (1,209,396 )   $ (73,545 )   $ (3,891,178 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    2,262       1,572       7,668  
Warrants issued in connection with convertible notes payable
    1,255       -       1,255  
Common stock issued for services
    454,600       -       2,298,990  
Stock option compensation
    198,620       -       198,620  
Effect of changes in:
                       
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    (898 )     -       (2,343 )
Deposits
    -       (4,750 )     (9,500 )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    35,195       (5,548 )     91,911  
Deferred revenue
    26,000       -       26,000  
Net cash used in operating activities
    (492,362 )     (82,271 )     (1,278,577 )
                         
Investing activities:
                       
Purchase of property and equipment
    -       (5,147 )     (30,712 )
Net cash used in investing activities
    -       (5,147 )     (30,712 )
                         
Financing activities:
                       
Proceeds from line of credit borrowings
    9,061       87,500       636,917  
Proceeds from sales of preferred stock
    125,000       -       625,000  
Proceeds from convertible notes payable
    125,900       -       125,900  
Net cash provided by financing activities
    259,961       87,500       1,387,817  
Net increase (decrease) in cash
    (232,401 )     82       78,528  
Cash, beginning of period
    310,929       -       -  
Cash, end of period
  $ 78,528     $ 82     $ 78,528  
                         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
                       
Cash paid for interest
  $ 17,868     $ 26,478     $ 72,495  
Cash paid for income taxes
  $ -     $ -     $ 1,850  
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
                       
Dividend issued to preferred stockholders, as converted
  $ 50,756     $ -     $ 98,635  
Conversion of preferred to common shares in reverse merger
  $ 625,000     $ -     $ 625,000  

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these financial statements

 
7

 

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2008
 
1.   Organization and Business

Hydrodynamic Technology, Inc. dba Cavitation Technologies, Inc (“Hydro” or the “Company”) was incorporated on January 29, 2007, in California.  The Company has one office in Chatsworth, California.

The Company is a development stage enterprise and is primarily engaged in the development of a bio-diesel fuel production system (Bioforce 9000 and the Reactor Skid).  The initial result of the Company’s research and development will be the generation of products for our target market of United States and international bio-diesel producers.  The Company’s success will depend in part on its ability to obtain patents, maintain trade secrets, and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others, both in the United States and other countries.  There can be no assurances that patents issued to the Company will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, or that the rights granted hereunder will provide proprietary protection or competitive advantage to the Company.

2. Basis of Presentation

On October 24, 2008, the Company effected a transaction with Bio Energy, Inc., a non-operating shell company (“Bio”) (the “Transaction”).  Under the terms of the Transaction, Bio performed a 7.5-to-1 forward stock split of its outstanding shares of common stock.  Bio issued 18,750,000 (post forward split) of its shares of common stock and assumed 410,000 warrants and 675,000 common stock options in exchange for 100% of the outstanding shares of the Company.  Immediately after the Transaction, there were a total of 28,030,178 shares of common stock outstanding, consisting of 18,750,000 shares owned by previous stockholders of the Company, as well as an additional 9,280,178 owned by others. The warrants converted to 279,800 Bio Common Stock warrants and the options converted to options to purchase 460,646 shares of Bio Common Stock.

The exchange of Hydro options and warrants for Bio options and warrants constituted a modification of their original grants as defined in SFAS No. 123(R). Accordingly, the Company made an assessment of the difference in their fair values immediately prior to, and immediately after the Transaction. Due to the relatively short period of time between the original issuance date and the Transaction date, as well as the fact that the holders received fewer options in Bio than they had in Hydro, there was no additional compensation expense recognized as a result of this modification.

From a legal perspective, Bio acquired Hydro. However from an accounting perspective, the Transaction is viewed as a recapitalization of Hydro accompanied by an issuance of stock by Hydro for the net assets of Bio. This is because Bio did not have operations immediately prior to the merger, and following the merger, Hydro is the operating company.  Hydro's officers and directors serve as the officers and directors of the new combined entity. Additionally, Hydro's stockholders own over 80% of the outstanding shares of Bio after the completion of the transaction.

Given these circumstances, the Transaction is accounted for as a capital transaction rather than as a business combination.  That is, the Transaction is equivalent to the issuance of stock by Hydro for the net assets of Bio, accompanied by a recapitalization.  The accounting is identical to that resulting from a reverse acquisition. Because the Transaction is accounted for as a capital transaction, and it occurred prior to the filing of this Form 10-Q, these financial statements represent the financial condition and results of operations of Hydro.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial statements and with instructions to Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Article 10 of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) for a fair presentation are included herein. Operating results for the three month period December 31, 2008 are not indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009.  These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 14, 2008.

 
8

 
 
Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.  The Company uses estimates in valuing stock options, warrants and common stock issued for services, among other items.
 
Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues in accordance to the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 101, Revenue Recognition , as amended by SAB 104.  As of December 31, 2008, the Company received a deposit from a customer of $26,000 relating to a sales order not yet completed.  This amount has been reflected in deferred revenue on the accompanying balance sheet as of December 31, 2008.  As of December 31, 2008, the Company has not recognized any revenue from the sales of its bio-diesel fuel production systems.

3. Management’s Plan

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Historically, the Company has no revenue, has incurred significant losses, and has not demonstrated the ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to satisfy its liabilities and sustain operations.

The Company has no significant operating history and, from January 29, 2007 (inception) through December 31, 2008, has generated a cumulative net loss of $3,891,178.  The Company also has negative cash flow from operations and a stockholders’ deficit. The accompanying financial statements for the three months and six months ended December 31, 2008 have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern.

Management’s plan regarding this uncertainty is to raise additional debt and/or equity financing to fund future operations and to provide additional working capital.  However, there is no assurance that such financing will be consummated or obtained in sufficient amounts necessary to meet the Company’s needs, or that the Company will be able to meet its future contractual obligations. Should management fail to obtain such financing, the Company may curtail its operations.

The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from an inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

4. Recent Accounting Standards

Accounting standards promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) change periodically.  Changes in such standards may have an impact on the Company’s future financial position.  The following are a summary of recent accounting developments.

In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles .  SFAS No, 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements for nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. SFAS 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval. The Company does not expect that this statement will result in a change in current practice.

 
9

 

In April 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 142-3 “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company will adopt this FSP beginning July 1, 2009 and it is not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).”  FSP APB 14-1 addresses instruments commonly referred to as Instrument C from Emerging Issues Task Force No.  90-19, which requires the issuer to settle the principal amount in cash and the conversion spread in cash or net shares at the issuer's option.  FSP APB 14-1 requires that issuers of these instruments account for their liability and equity components separately by bifurcating the conversion option from the debt instrument, classifying the conversion option in equity, and then accreting the resulting discount on the debt as additional interest expense over the expected life of the debt. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years, and requires retrospective application to all periods presented. Early application is not permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this statement; however, but believes any impact with respect to future debt transactions could be material.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities , an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.  SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about a company's derivative and hedging activities. These enhanced disclosures will discuss (a) how and why a company uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133 and its related interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after November 15, 2008, with earlier adoption allowed. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on our financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements . SFAS No.157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning January 29, 2007.   In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on our  financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51 .  SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non--controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.  SFAS No. 160 clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements and requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests, of which the Company currently has none.  All other requirements of SFAS No. 160 shall be applied prospectively.  SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company anticipates that SFAS No. 160 will not have any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 
10

 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(revised 2007), Business Combinations , which revises current purchase accounting guidance in SFAS 141, Business Combinations . SFAS No. 141R requires most assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination to be measured at their fair values as of the date of acquisition. SFAS No. 141R also modifies the initial measurement and subsequent remeasurement of contingent consideration and acquired contingencies, and requires that acquisition related costs be recognized as expense as incurred rather than capitalized as part of the cost of the acquisition. SFAS No. 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and is to be applied prospectively to business combinations occurring after adoption. The impact of SFAS No. 141R on the Company’s financial statements will depend on the nature and extent of the Company’s future acquisition activities.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities .  SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of the entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007.  The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans . FAS-158 requires employers to fully recognize the obligations associated with single-employer defined benefit pension, retiree healthcare and other postretirement plans in their financial statements. The provisions of SFAS No. 158 are effective for the Company as of the end of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not have any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future financial statements.

5. Net Loss per Common Share – Basic and Diluted

The Company computes loss per common share using SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share .  The net loss per common share, both basic and diluted, is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. The diluted loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average shares outstanding assuming all dilutive potential common shares were issued.  As of December 31, 2008, the Company had 545,646 stock options and 359,800 warrants outstanding to purchase common stock that were not included in the diluted net loss per common share due to the options and warrants being anti-dilutive.  In addition, the Company had $125,000 of convertible notes payable outstanding (see Note 8) which are convertible into common stock of the Company that were not included in the diluted net loss per common share due to the amounts being anti-dilutive.  As such, the basic and diluted loss per common share equals the net loss, as reported, divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the respective periods.

 
11

 

6. Property and equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008.
 
   
December 31,
   
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2008
 
             
Leasehold improvements
  $ 2,475     $ 2,475  
Furniture and fixtures
    26,837       26,837  
Office equipment
    1,400       1,400  
                 
      30,712       30,712  
                 
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (7,668 )     (5,406 )
                 
    $ 23,044     $ 25,306  

Depreciation expense for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $1,131 and $786, respectively.  Depreciation expense for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $2,262 and $1,572, respectively.

7. Line of Credit

On February 2, 2007, the Company contracted a $700,000 revolving line of credit from National Bank of California.  The line of credit bears interest at Prime plus 1%, which was 4.25% (1% plus 3.25% prime rate) at December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008.  The balance outstanding under this line of credit was $636,917 at December 31, 2008 and $627,856 at June 30, 2008.  The maturity date of this loan was July 2, 2008, but was extended to January 2, 2009.  The loan has since expired and the Company is in the process of renegotiating the terms and conditions with the bank. This line of credit is personally guaranteed by the Company’s major shareholders and Board members, and secured by the assets of the Company.

8. Convertible Notes Payable

In December 2008, the Company entered into a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), where the Company issued an aggregate of $125,000 of notes payable which accrue interest a rate of 12% per annum and are due on April 30, 2009.  Under the terms of the Agreement, the lenders may convert all principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate equal to the average closing price of the Company’s closing stock for the 10 days immediately preceding the conversion request.

In addition, in accordance with the Agreement, the Company issued to the lenders warrants to purchase an aggregate of 83,333 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share.  The warrants are vested immediately and have a contractual life of 4 years.  The fair value of each warrant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model with input assumptions of (1) volatility of 64%, (2) expected life of 2 years, (3) risk free rates ranging from 0.68% to 0.74%, and (4) expected dividends of zero.  The total fair value of the warrants issued amounted to $26,357, which was recorded as a discount to the face value of the convertible notes payable.  As of December 31, 2008 (unaudited), the remaining discount amounted to $24,202 and the carrying value of the convertible notes payable amounted to $100,798.

9. Stockholders’ Equity

Authorized shares – As a result of the merger with Bio (see Note 2) the Company is currently authorized under its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to issue Common Stock only. The total number of shares of Common Stock which this corporation shall have authority to issue is 100,000,000 shares. Each share of Common Stock has a par value of $.001.

Series A-1 Preferred Stock – As a result of the merger with Bio (see Note 2) the Company no longer has any Preferred Stock authorized or issed. Following is a discussion about Preferred Stock issuances prior to the Bio merger.

 
12

 

On March 31, 2008, the Company issued 200,000 units comprised of five shares of its Series A-1 Preferred Stock (total of 1,000,000 preferred shares) and one warrant to purchase one share of common stock at $0.75 per share for a total consideration of $500,000.

On October 3, 2008, the Company issued 210,000 units comprised of five shares of its Series A-1 Preferred Stock (total of 1,050,000 preferred shares) and one warrant to purchase one share of common stock at $0.75 per share for total proceeds of $525,000, which were placed in escrow.  Upon the closing of escrow on October 3, 2008, $400,000 was used to purchase 50.5% of the outstanding shares of Bio (see Note 2), and the remaining $125,000 was distributed to the Company.

On October 24, 2008, in connection with the reverse merger (see Note 2), all shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock were converted to common shares of Bio. The accompanying financial statements have retroactively shown the recapitalization for all periods presented. As a result, there is no Preferred stock shown in the balance sheets or statements of stockholders’ deficit.

Dividends – The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and Series A-1 Preferred Stock were entitled to receive , out of any funds legally available therefore, dividends at the rate of $0.12 and $0.05 per share per annum, respectively, payable in preference to any payment of any dividend on Common Stock. After payment of such dividends, any additional dividends declared shall be payable entirely to the holders of Common Stock. The right of the holders of Series A Preferred Stock to receive dividends shall be cumulative, and shall accrue to holders of Series A Preferred Stock if such dividends are not paid in any prior year.
 
Stock Split - In March 2008, the board of directors approved a 2,100-to-1 forward stock split of the Corporation’s common stock, which was distributed on March 31, 2008 to stockholders of record on January 29, 2007.

On October 24, 2008, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with Bio in which Bio acquired all of the outstanding shares of the Company’s shareholders (see Note 2).  Under the terms of the share exchange agreement, Bio performed a 7.5-to-1 forward stock split of its outstanding shares of common stock.

The common stock activity for all periods presented in the accompanying financial statements have been restated to give retroactive recognition to these stock splits and the conversion to Bio shares. In addition, all references in the financial statements and notes to financial statements to weighted average number of shares, per share amounts, and market prices of the Company’s common stock have been restated to give retroactive recognition to the stock split.

Warrants – On March 31, 2008 in conjunction with the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, the Company issued 200,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share.  The warrants vest immediately and have a contractual life of 5 years.  The total value of the warrants issued amounted to $47,879, which has been reflected as a dividend to preferred stockholders in the accompanying financial statements.  The value was determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model with input assumptions of (1) volatility of 148%, (2) expected life of 2.5 years, (3) risk free rate of 1.79%, and (4) expected dividends of zero.

On October 3, 2008, in conjunction with the issuance of a total of 1,050,000 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock, the Company issued 210,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share.  The warrants vest immediately and have a contractual life of 5 years.  The total value of the warrants issued amounted to $50,291, which has been reflected as a dividend to preferred shareholders in the accompanying financial statements.  The value was determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model with input assumptions of (1) volatility of 148%, (2) expected life of 2.5 years, (3) risk free rate of 1.86%, and (4) expected dividends of zero.

On October 24, 2008, in connection with the Bio transaction (see Note 2), 410,000 warrants in Hydro converted to 279,800 warrants in Bio.

In December 2008, the Company issued an aggregate of 80,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share (see Note 8).

 
13

 

10. Share Based Compensation

On July 21, 2008, the Company adopted the 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) that provides for the granting of stock options to certain key employees.  The Plan reserves 4,000,000 shares of common stock. Options under the Plan are to be granted at no less than fair market value of the shares at the date of grant.

 On August 1, 2008, the Company issued 660,000 stock options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $1.68 per share.  The options vested immediately and have a contractual life of 10 years.  The total value of the options issued on August 1, 2008 amounted to $194,030, which is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of operations.

On October 1, 2008, the Company issued 15,000 stock options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1 per share.  The options vest immediately and have a contractual life of 10 years.  The total value of the options issued on October 1, 2008 amounted to $4,590, which is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of operations.

On October 24, 2008, 675,000 options in Hydro converted to 460,646 options in Bio (see Note 2).

On October 28, the Company issued 85,000 stock options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2 per share.  The options vest immediately. Of the 85,000 options issued, 50,000 have a contractual life of nine months from issuance and the remaining 35,000 have a contractual life of ten years.  The total value of the options issued on October 28, 2008 amounted to $21, which is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of operations.

The fair value of each option award was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model The expected volatility was based on volatilities of other publicly traded development stage companies in the Company’s industry.  The expected term of the options granted was estimated to represent the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.  The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.  Assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the options issued are as follows.
 
Expected life in years
   
0.38 - 5.0
 
Stock price volatility
   
64% - 148%
 
Risk free interest rate
   
0.77% - 3.23%
 
Expected dividends
 
None
 
Forfeiture rate
   
0%
 

 
14

 

The following summarizes the activity of the Company’s stock options for the six months ended December 31, 2008:

               
Weighted-
       
               
Average
       
         
Weighted-
   
Remaining
       
         
Average
   
Contractual
   
Aggregate
 
         
Exercise
   
Life
   
Intrinsic
 
   
Options
   
Price
   
(Years)
   
Value
 
                         
Outstanding at July 1, 2008
    -     $ -       -     $ -  
Granted
    545,646       1.72       9.63       -  
Exercised
    -       -                  
Forfeited
    -       -                  
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
    545,646       1.72       9.63       -  
                                 
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2008
    545,646       1.72       9.63       -  
                                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2008
    545,646       1.72       9.63       -  
 
There were no options exercised as of December 31, 2008.  There is no unvested compensation as of December 31, 2008.  The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the six months ended December 31, 2008 amounted to $0.26 per share.

11. Income Taxes

Under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting , the Company is required to adjust its effective tax rate each quarter to be consistent with the estimated annual effective tax rate. The Company is also required to record the tax impact of certain discrete items, unusual or infrequently occurring, including changes in judgment about valuation allowances and effects of changes in tax laws or rates, in the interim period in which they occur. In addition, jurisdictions with a projected loss for the year or a year-to-date loss where no tax benefit can be recognized are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. The impact of such an exclusion could result in a higher or lower effective tax rate during a particular quarter, based upon the mix and timing of actual earnings versus annual projections.

Hydro, in its capacity as the operating company taking over Bio’s income tax positions in addition to its own positions after October 24, 2008 (see Note 2), has estimated its annual effective tax rate to be zero. This is based on an expectation that the combined entity will generate net operating losses in the year ending June 30, 2009, and it is not more likely than not that those losses will be recovered using future taxable income. Therefore, no provision for income tax has been recorded as of and for the period ended December 31, 2008.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
 
The following discussion and analysis of should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and the related notes.  This discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as its plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Its actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.

 
15

 

Overview
 
Hydrodynamic Technology, Inc. dba Cavitation Technologies, Inc (Company) was incorporated January 29, 2007, in California.  We have one office in Chatsworth, California.

We are a development stage enterprise that is primarily engaged in the development of a bio-diesel fuel production system (Bioforce 9000 and the Reactor Skid).  The initial focus of the Company’s research and development is the generation of products for our target market of US and International bio-diesel producers.  The Company’s success will depend in part on its ability to obtain patents, maintain trade secrets, and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others, both in the United States and other countries.  There can be no assurances that patents issued to the Company will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, or that the rights granted hereunder will provide proprietary protection or competitive advantage to the Company.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

The following is a comparison of the results of operations for the Company for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
 
   
Three Months Ended
             
   
December 31,
             
   
2008
   
2007
   
$ Change
   
% Change
 
                                 
General and administrative expenses
  $ 660,586     $ 15,451     $ 645,135       4175.4 %
Research and development expenses
    48,671       4,611       44,060       955.5 %
Total operating expenses
    709,257       20,062       689,195       3435.3 %
Loss from operations
    (709,257 )     (20,062 )     (689,195 )     3435.3 %
Interest expense
    (11,681 )     (11,532 )     (149 )     1.3 %
Loss before income taxes
    (720,938 )     (31,594 )     (689,344 )     2181.9 %
Income tax expense
    -       -       -       0.0 %
Net loss
  $ (720,938 )   $ (31,594 )   $ (689,344 )     2181.9 %
 
Sales
 
We had no sales for the three months ended December 31, 2008 or 2007. In December 2008, we received a deposit for the sale of our first operational bio-diesel production system. As the specifics of the sale had not yet been finalized, we deferred this revenue until such time as we have a fully documented contract of sale. We believe this will be during our fiscal third quarter ending March 31, 2009.
 
General and Administrative Expenses
 
Our general and administrative expenses increased by $645,135, or 4,175.4%, for the three months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007.  In 2008, we issued shares of common stock to consultants in payment for their services to the Company which resulted in expenses of $444,500.  We had no such expenses in 2007.  We also issued stock options to employees as compensation in 2008 resulting in increased expense of $4,590.  We had no such expenses in 2007.  In addition, we incurred increased salary and related expenses of approximately $74,000 in 2008 resulting from the Company having more employees.  We also incurred increased legal and accounting fees of approximately $58,000 in 2008 due primarily to expenses incurred in conjunction with the Company’s reverse merger transaction.
 
Research and Development Expenses
 
Our research and development expenses increased by $44,060, or 955.5% for the three months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007.  The increase related primarily to additional expenses during 2008 associated with fabrication and prototype development, as well as the cost of raw feed stock for testing our Bio Force system.
 
 
16

 
 
Interest Expense
 
Interest expense for the three months ended December 31, 2008 remained consistent as compared to 2007 as a result of   the Company’s overall debt levels remaining constant.
 
Results of Operations for the Six months ended December 31, 2008 compared to the six months ended December 31, 2007
 
   
Six Months Ended
             
   
December 31,
             
   
2008
   
2007
   
$ Change
   
% Change
 
                                 
General and administrative expenses
  $ 1,009,532     $ 36,839     $ 972,693       2640.4 %
Research and development expenses
    178,546       10,228       168,318       1645.7 %
Total operating expenses
    1,188,078       47,067       1,141,011       2424.2 %
Loss from operations
    (1,188,078 )     (47,067 )     (1,141,011 )     2424.2 %
Interest expense
    (21,318 )     (26,478 )     5,160       -19.5 %
Loss before income taxes
    (1,209,396 )     (73,545 )     (1,135,851 )     1544.4 %
Income tax expense
    -       -       -       0.0 %
Net loss
  $ (1,209,396 )   $ (73,545 )   $ (1,135,851 )     1544.4 %
 
Sales
 
We had no sales for the six months ended December 31, 2008 or 2007. In December 2008, we received a deposit for the sale of our first operational bio-diesel production system. As the specifics of the sale had not yet been finalized, we deferred this revenue until such time as we have a fully documented contract of sale. We believe this will be during our fiscal third quarter ending March 31, 2009.
 
General and Administrative Expenses
 
Our general and administrative expenses increased by $972,693, or 2,640.4%, for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007.  In 2008, we issued shares of common stock to consultants in payment for their services to the Company which resulted in expenses of $444,500.  We had no such expenses in 2007.  We also issued stock options to employees as compensation in 2008 resulting in increased expense of $198,620.  We had no such expenses in 2007.  In addition, we incurred increased salary and related expenses of approximately $118,000 in 2008 resulting from the Company having more employees.  We also incurred increased legal and accounting fees of approximately $112,000 in 2008 due primarily to expenses incurred in conjunction with the Company’s reverse merger transaction.
 
Research and Development Expenses
 
Our research and development expenses increased by $168,318, or 1,645.7% for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007.  The increase related primarily to additional expenses during 2008 associated with fabrication and prototype development, as well as the cost of raw feed stock for testing our Bio Force system.
 
Interest Expense
 
Interest expense decreased by $5,160, or 19.5%, for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007.  In 2008, we had a higher average outstanding debt balance than during 2007.  The additional convertible debt issued in December 2008 did not result in a significant amount of interest expense, as it was only outstanding for a short period of time during the six months ended December 31, 2008. Additionally, as a result of the interest on our line of credit being tied to Prime, the interest rate was lower in 2008 than in 2007.
 
 
17

 
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Our principal source of funds has been from borrowings under a line of credit agreement, as well as money raised from the sale of preferred stock.  At December 31, 2008, we had borrowings of $636,917 compared with $627,856 at June 30, 2008.  In addition, on March 31, 2008, we raised $500,000 through the sale of 1,000,000 shares of our preferred stock and on October 3, 2008, we raised $125,000 through the sale of 1,050,000 shares of our preferred stock.  We also raised an additional $125,000 through the issuance of convertible notes payable in December 2008.
 
As of December 31, 2008, we had cash of $78,528 as compared to $310,929 at June 30, 2008.  The decrease in cash is primarily due to the cash used in operations for the six months ended December 31, 2008.
 
As of December 31, 2008, our total current liabilities, excluding our outstanding line of credit balance and convertible notes payable, were $117,901, compared to $56,706 at June 30, 2008. Current liabilities at December 31, 2008 included accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred revenue, and represented primarily outstanding amounts for salaries and professional fees.
 
We have no significant operating history and, from January 29, 2007 (inception) through December 31, 2008, we have generated a net loss of $3,891,178.  Management’s plan is to raise additional debt and/or equity financing to fund future operations and to provide additional working capital.  However, there is no assurance that such financing will be consummated or obtained in sufficient amounts necessary to meet the Company’s needs, or that the Company will be able to meet its future contractual obligations. Should management fail to obtain such financing, the Company may curtail its operations.
 
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles .  SFAS No, 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements for nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. SFAS 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval. The Company does not expect that this statement will result in a change in current practice.

In April 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 142-3 “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company will adopt this FSP beginning July 1, 2009 and it is not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).”  FSP APB 14-1 addresses instruments commonly referred to as Instrument C from Emerging Issues Task Force No.  90-19, which requires the issuer to settle the principal amount in cash and the conversion spread in cash or net shares at the issuer's option.  FSP APB 14-1 requires that issuers of these instruments account for their liability and equity components separately by bifurcating the conversion option from the debt instrument, classifying the conversion option in equity, and then accreting the resulting discount on the debt as additional interest expense over the expected life of the debt. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years, and requires retrospective application to all periods presented. Early application is not permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this statement; however, but believes any impact with respect to future debt transactions could be material.

 
18

 

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities , an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.  SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about a company's derivative and hedging activities. These enhanced disclosures will discuss (a) how and why a company uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133 and its related interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after November 15, 2008, with earlier adoption allowed. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on our  financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements . SFAS No.157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning January 29, 2007.   In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51 .  SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non--controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.  SFAS No. 160 clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements and requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests, of which the Company currently has none.  All other requirements of SFAS No. 160 shall be applied prospectively.  SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company anticipates that SFAS No. 160 will not have any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(revised 2007), Business Combinations , which revises current purchase accounting guidance in SFAS 141, Business Combinations . SFAS No. 141R requires most assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination to be measured at their fair values as of the date of acquisition. SFAS No. 141R also modifies the initial measurement and subsequent remeasurement of contingent consideration and acquired contingencies, and requires that acquisition related costs be recognized as expense as incurred rather than capitalized as part of the cost of the acquisition. SFAS No. 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and is to be applied prospectively to business combinations occurring after adoption. The impact of SFAS No. 141R on the Company’s financial statements will depend on the nature and extent of the Company’s future acquisition activities.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities .  SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of the entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007.  The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans . FAS-158 requires employers to fully recognize the obligations associated with single-employer defined benefit pension, retiree healthcare and other postretirement plans in their financial statements. The provisions of SFAS No. 158 are effective for the Company as of the end of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not have any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future financial statements.

 
19

 

We do not believe that the adoption of the above recent pronouncements will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
The foregoing discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We believe that the following are some of the more critical judgment areas in the application of our accounting policies that affect our financial statements.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
On October 24, 2008, the Company effected a transaction with Bio Energy, Inc., a non-operating shell company (“Bio”) (the “Transaction”)

From a legal perspective, Bio acquired Hydro. However from an accounting perspective, the Transaction is viewed as a recapitalization of Hydro accompanied by an issuance of stock by Hydro for the net assets of Bio. This is because Bio did not have operations immediately prior to the merger, and following the merger, Hydro is the operating company.  Hydro's officers and directors will serve as the officers and directors of the new combined entity.

Given these circumstances, the Transaction is accounted for as a capital transaction rather than as a business combination.  That is, the Transaction is equivalent to the issuance of stock by Hydro for the net assets of Bio, accompanied by a recapitalization.  The accounting is identical to that resulting from a reverse acquisition. Because the Transaction is accounted for as a capital transaction, and it occurred prior to the filing of this Form 10-Q, these financial statements represent the financial condition and results of operations of Hydro.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.  We use estimates in valuing our stock options, warrants and common stock issued for services, among other items.
 
Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs consist of expenditures for the research and development of new product lines and technology.  These costs are primarily payroll and payroll related expenses and costs of various sample parts.  Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
We are a smaller reporting company and are not required to provide the information under this item pursuant to paragraph (e) of Regulation S-K. 

 
20

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of December 31, 2008, the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, due to the existence of material weaknesses, our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of December 31, 2008.
 
Management identified material weaknesses which were reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2008, under Risk Factors and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have been no changes to the identified material weaknesses.
 
In an effort to mitigate and remediate some of these material weaknesses, management engaged an outside accounting consultant during the quarter ended December 31, 2008. In addition, we have started to identify ways to improve our standards and procedures, including upgrading and establishing controls over the accounting system to ensure we have appropriate internal control over financial reporting.
 
Based on the evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our last fiscal quarter, identified in connection with that evaluation, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II
OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceeding against our Company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation.  There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

Item 2  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On October 24, 2008, Bio Energy, Inc, completed an acquisition of all the outstanding shares of Hydrodynamic Technology, Inc, In connection with this transaction, Bio Energy, Inc. issued 18,750,000 shares of its common stock to the shareholders of Hydrodynamic Technology, Inc. in exchange for all the outstanding shares of Hydrodyanamic Technology, Inc..

Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4 – Submission of Matters to a vote of Securities Holders .

On October 6, 2008, we amended our certificate of incorporation to (i) change our name from Bio Energy, Inc . to Cavitation Technologies, Inc.; (ii) effect a 7.5 for 1 forward split of our outstanding securities and (iii) increase our authorized shares of Common Stock to 100,000,000.  We submitted the matter to our shareholder via written consent and a majority of the outstanding shares voted in favor of the amendment.

 
21

 

Item 5 – Other Information

None

Item 6 – Exhibits

The following exhibits are included as a part of this report by reference:

3.1  Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation

31.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURE
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
     
February 14, 2009 
   
   
 
By:  
/s/ Roman Gordon
   
Roman Gordon, Chief Executive Officer

 
22

 








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 

I, Roman Gordon, certify that:

1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cavitation Technologies, Inc.;

2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.           The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)           designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)           designed such internal control over financial reporting, or cause such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;  and

d)           disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.           The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)           all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
     
       
February 14, 2009
 
/s/ Roman Gordon
 
   
Roman Gordon
 

 
 

 
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
I, R.L. Hartshorn, certify that:

1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cavitation Technologies, Inc.;

2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.           The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)           designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)           designed such internal control over financial reporting, or cause such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;  and

d)           disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.           The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)           all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     
       
February 14, 2009
By:
/s/ R.L. Hartshorn
 
   
R.L. Hartshorn
 
   
Chief Financial Officer
 

 
 

 
 
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
     
       
February 14, 2009
 
/s/ Roman Gordon
 
   
Roman Gordon
 
   
Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
 
       
 
 
 

 
 
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Principal Financial Officer of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
     
       
February 14, 2009
 
/s/ R.L. Hartshorn
 
   
R.L. Hartshorn
 
   
Chief Financial Officer