MUTUALFIRST FINANCIAL INC (Form: 10-K, Received: 03/23/2009 16:21:31)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
	OR
¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from to

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-27905

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Maryland	35-2085640
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

110 E. Charles Street, Muncie, Indiana	47305-2419
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (765) 747-2800

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share	The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Act. (Check one)

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company filer x
		(Do not check if smaller
		reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES ¨ NO x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to the last sale price of such stock on the Nasdaq Global Market as of June 29, 2008, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $29.7 million. (The exclusion from such amount of the market value of the shares owned by any person shall not be deemed an admission by the registrant that such person is an affiliate of the registrant.)

As of March 19, 2009, there were 6,984,754 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

PART III of Form 10-K—Portions of registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 1. Business

General

MutualFirst Financial, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“ MutualFirst ” or the “Company”), is a savings and loan holding company that has as its wholly-owned subsidiary MutualBank (“Mutual” or the “Bank”). MFS Financial was formed in September 1999 to become the holding company of Mutual in connection with Mutual’s conversion from the mutual to stock form of organization on December 29, 1999. In April 2001, MFS Financial formally changed its corporate name to MutualFirst Financial, Inc. (“ MutualFirst ”). The words “we,” “our” and “us” refer to MutualFirst and MutualBank on a consolidated basis.

At December 31, 2008, we had total assets of $1.4 billion, deposits of $962.5 million and stockholders’ equity of $130.5 million. Our executive offices are located at 110 E. Charles Street, Muncie, Indiana 47305-2400, and our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “MFSF.”

Substantially all of MutualFirst ’s business is conducted through Mutual, which is a federal savings bank subject to extensive regulation by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”). Mutual’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).

Our principal business consists of attracting retail deposits from the general public and investing those funds primarily in loans secured by first mortgages on owner-occupied, one- to four-family residences, a variety of consumer loans, loans secured by commercial and multi-family real estate and commercial business loans. Funds not invested in loans generally are invested in investment securities, including mortgage-backed and mortgage-related securities.

Our profitability depends primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between interest and dividend income on interest-earning assets, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Interest-earning assets include principally loans, investment securities, including mortgage-backed and related securities and interest-earning deposits in other institutions. Net interest income is dependent upon the level of interest rates and the extent to which such rates are changing. Our profitability is also dependent, to a lesser extent, on the level of noninterest income, provision for loan losses, noninterest expense and income taxes. Our operations and profitability are subject to changes in interest rates, applicable statutes and regulations, and general economic conditions, as well as other factors beyond our control.

We offer deposit accounts having a wide range of interest rates and terms, which generally include passbook and statement savings, money market deposit accounts, NOW and interest checking accounts and certificates of deposit with terms ranging from seven days to 83 months. We solicit most of our deposits in our market areas and we occasionally accept brokered deposits. See “Sources of Funds – Deposits.”

MutualWealth, formerly Community Wealth Management Group, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFB Financial, is the wealth management division of the bank that provides a variety of complimentary, fee based financial services including trust, investment, insurance, broker advisory, retirement plan and private banking services in the Bank's market area. As of December 31, 2008, MutualWealth managed assets of $352.0 million.

On July 18, 2008, the Company acquired MFB Corp. ("MFB") and merged MFB’s subsidiary bank, MFB Financial, into MutualBank in accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 7, 2008 (the "Merger Agreement"). MutualFirst issued an aggregate of 2.9 million shares of its common stock and paid approximately $11.5 million in cash to MFB stockholders in the transaction. MutualFirst also assumed 114,500 MFB stock options, which have converted into approximately 296,555 MutualFirst stock options with a weighted average exercise price of $9.90 per share. As a result of the transaction, MutualBank now has 33 retail financial centers, spanning nine Indiana counties and is the 11 th largest depository institution headquartered in Indiana. MutualBank also has trust offices in Carmel and Crawfordsville, Indiana and a loan origination office in New Buffalo, Michigan.

On December 23, 2008, as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement and Securities Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “Purchase Agreement”) with the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), pursuant to which the Company (i) sold 32,382 shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) for a purchase price of $32,382,000 in cash and (ii) issued a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 625,135 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), for a per share price of $7.77 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum thereafter. The Series A Preferred Stock may be redeemed by the Company at any time, subject to consultation by the Treasury with the Officer of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”). The Warrant has a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance, with an exercise price, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, equal to $7.77 per share of the Common Stock. If the Series A Preferred Stock is redeemed, the Warrant will be liquidated at the current market price. The Warrant is attached as Exhibit 4.2 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference. Treasury has agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of Common Stock issued upon exercise of the Warrant that it holds.

Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the ability of the Company to declare or pay dividends or distributions on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, shares of its Junior Stock (as defined below) and Parity Stock (as defined below) will be subject to restrictions, including a restriction against increasing dividends from the last quarterly cash dividend per share ($0.16) declared on the Common Stock prior to December 23, 2008. The redemption, purchase or other acquisition of trust preferred securities of the Company or its affiliates also will be restricted. These restrictions will terminate on the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, (b) the date on which the Series A Preferred Stock has been redeemed in whole; and (c) the date Treasury has transferred all of the Series A Preferred Stock to third parties. In addition, the ability of the Company to declare or pay dividends or distributions on, or repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, shares of its Junior Stock and Parity Stock will be subject to restrictions in the event that the Company fails to declare and pay full dividends (or declare and set aside a sum sufficient for payment thereof) on its Series A Preferred Stock. “Junior Stock” means the Common Stock and any other class or series of stock of the Company the terms of which expressly provide that it ranks junior to the Series A Preferred Stock as to dividend rights and/or rights on liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. “Parity Stock” means any class or series of stock of the Company the terms of which do not expressly provide that such class or series will rank senior or junior to the Series A Preferred Stock as to dividend rights and/or rights on liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company (in each case without regard to whether dividends accrue cumulatively or non-cumulatively).

The Company placed $29.1 million of TARP proceeds into its wholly-owned subsidiary MutualBank, while maintaining the $3.2 million with the Company. MutualBank placed approximately $20.0 million of the proceeds in highly rated securities. Of the $20.0 million, approximately $14.8 million was placed in mortgage securities, $3.2 million in municipal securities and $2.0 million in corporate bonds. These securities will provide liquidity as needed to meet current and future loan demand. The remaining funds held at MutualBank were placed in working capital, which was used to fund loans and meet the cash needs of MutualBank.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-K contains various forward-looking statements that are based on assumptions and describe our future plans and strategies and our expectations. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by words such as “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or similar words. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is uncertain. Factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, general economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the quality and composition of our loan and investment portfolios, demand for our loan products, deposit flows, our operating expenses, competition, demand for financial services in our market areas and accounting principles and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements, and you should not rely too much on these statements. We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim, any obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Difficult market conditions and economic trends have adversely affected our industry and our business.

Dramatic declines in the housing market, with decreasing home prices and increasing delinquencies and foreclosures, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage and construction loans and resulted in significant write-downs of assets by many financial institutions. General downward economic trends, reduced availability of commercial credit and increasing unemployment have negatively impacted the credit performance of commercial and consumer credit, resulting in additional write-downs. Concerns over the stability of the financial markets and the economy have resulted in decreased lending by some financial institutions to their customers and to each other. This market turmoil and tightening of credit has led to increased commercial and consumer deficiencies, lack of customer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction in general business activity. Some financial institutions have experienced decreased access to deposits or borrowings.

The resulting economic pressure on the consumer and businesses and the lack of confidence in the financial markets may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and stock price.

Our ability to assess the creditworthiness of customers and to estimate the losses inherent in our credit exposure is made more complex by these difficult market and economic conditions. We also expect to face increased regulation and government oversight as a result of these downward trends. This increased government action may increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue certain business opportunities. We also may be required to pay even higher Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation premiums than the recently increased level, because financial institutions failures resulting from the depressed market conditions have depleted and may continue to deplete the deposit insurance fund and reduce its ratio of reserves to insured deposits.

We do not believe these difficult conditions are likely to improve in the near future. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market and economic conditions on us, our customers and the other financial institutions in our market. As a result, we may experience increases in foreclosures, delinquencies and customer bankruptcies, as well as more restricted access to funds.

Recent legislative and regulatory initiatives to address these difficult market and economic conditions may not stabilize the US banking system.

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) authorizes the United States Department of Treasury, hereafter the Treasury Department, to purchase from financial institutions and their holding companies up to $700 billion in mortgage loans, mortgage-related securities and certain other financial instruments, including debt and equity securities issued by financial institutions and their holding companies in a troubled asset relief program. The purpose of the troubled asset relief program is to restore confidence and stability to the U.S. banking system and to encourage financial institutions to increase their lending to customers and to each other. The Treasury Department has allocated $350 billion towards the troubled asset relief program to the capital purchase program. Under the capital purchase program, the Treasury Department will purchase debt or equity securities from participating institutions. The troubled asset relief program is also expected to include direct purchases or guarantees of troubled assets of financial institutions.

EESA also increased Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance on most accounts from $100,000 to $250,000. This increase is in place until the end of 2009 and is not covered by deposit insurance premiums paid by the banking industry. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has implemented two temporary programs to provide deposit insurance for the full amount of most non-interest bearing transaction accounts through the end of 2009 and to guarantee certain unsecured debt of financial institutions and their holding companies through June 2012. Financial institutions have until November 12, 2008 to opt out of these two programs. The purpose of these legislative and regulatory actions is to stabilize the volatility in the U.S. banking system.

EESA, the troubled asset relief program and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s recent regulatory initiatives may not stabilize the U.S. banking system or financial markets. If the volatility in the market and the economy continue or worsen, our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to funds and the price of our stock could be materially and adversely impacted.

The recently enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “AARA”) is a broad based economic stimulus bill that contains a broad range of tax revisions and government spending to address the national economic decline. It does not contain any specific provisions governing financial institutions, except for TARP recipients. It imposes new compensation limits and requirements on TARP recipients and allows TARP funds to be returned with the requirements for replacement capital or the passage of set time periods included in the TARP agreement.

Market Area

We are a community-oriented financial institution offering a variety of financial services to meet the needs of the communities we serve. We are headquartered in Muncie, Indiana and we offer our financial services through 33 full service retail financial centers offices in Delaware, Elkhart, Grant, Kosciusko, Randolph, St. Joseph and Wabash counties. MutualBank also has trust offices in Carmel and Crawfordsville, Indiana and a loan origination office in New Buffalo, Michigan. We also originate mortgage loans in the counties contiguous to these counties, and we originate indirect consumer loans throughout Indiana. See “Lending Activities — Consumer and Other Lending.”

Lending Activities

General. Our loans carry either a fixed- or an adjustable-rate of interest. At December 31, 2008, our net loan portfolio totaled $1.1 billion, which constituted 80.1% of our total assets.

Loans up to $600,000 may be approved by individual loan officers. Loans in excess of $600,000, but not in excess of $1.2 million, may be approved by the signature of an Executive Loan Committee member and one other loan officer to the total of their combined individual lending authority. Loans not to exceed $3.0 million, to a borrower whose aggregate debt is not greater than $5.0 million, may be approved by a majority vote of the Executive Loan Committee. All loans in excess of $3.0 million and loans of any amount to a borrower whose aggregate debt will exceed $5.0 million must be approved by the Board of Directors. The aggregate limit may be increased by or decreased by a specific guidance by the Board for a specific borrower.

At December 31, 2008, the maximum amount which we could lend to any one borrower and the borrower’s related entities was approximately $22.5 million. As of December 31, 2008, our largest lending relationship to a single borrower or group of related borrowers consisted of four loans totaling $6.9 million. All of the loans in this relationship are secured by real estate consisting of retail, franchised, auto service centers guaranteed by the principal owners and supported by long term leases to the franchisor. Each of these loans to this group of borrowers was current and performing in accordance with its terms at December 31, 2008.

The following table presents information concerning the composition of our loan portfolio in dollar amounts and in percentages as of the dates indicated.

	December 31,
	2008						2007						2006						2005						2004
	Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real Estate Loans :
One- to four-family	$	521,364	(1)		46.11	%	$	431,018	(2)		53.02	%	$	433,123	(3)		53.01	%	$	451,914	(4)		54.00	%	$	385,678	(5)		52.96	%
Multi-family		2,698			0.24			3,929			0.48			5,073			0.62			5,505			0.66			4,657			.64
Commercial		250,693			22.17			82,116			10.10			73,912			9.05			77,270			9.23			68,067			9.35
Construction and development		12,232			1.08			13,560			1.67			14,451			1.77			22,938			2.74			20,745			2.85
Total real estate loans	$	786,987			69.60		$	530,623			65.28		$	526,559			64.45			557,627			66.63			479,147			65.80

Other Loans :
Consumer Loans:
Automobile	$	22,715			2.01		$	22,917			2.82		$	31,336			3.84			39,802			4.76			39,475			5.42
Home equity		66,460			5.88			27,232			3.35			30,051			3.68			31,962			3.82			29,464			4.05
Home improvement		45,339			4.01			45,156			5.55			38,546			4.72			31,933			3.82			23,289			3.20
Manufactured housing		727			0.06			992			0.12			1,422			0.17			2,106			0.25			2,879			.40
R.V.		79,884			7.07			77,805			9.57			71,321			8.73			64,222			7.67			58,643			8.05
Boat		46,928			4.15			47,816			5.88			46,311			5.67			40,631			4.85			38,382			5.27
Other		6,339			0.56			3,593			0.44			3,986			.48			4,305			.51			3,325			.46
Total consumer loans		268,392			23.74			225,511			27.74			222,973			27.29			214,961			25.68			195,457			26.84
Commercial business loans		75,290			6.66			56,764			6.98			67,476			8.26			64,353			7.69			53,620			7.36
Total other loans		343,682			30.40			282,275			34.72			290,449			35.55			279,314			33.37			249,077			34.20
Total loans receivable, gross		1,130,669	(1)		100.00	%		812,898	(2)		100.00	%		817,008	(3)		100.00	%		836,941	(4)		100.00	%		728,224	(5)		100.00	%

Less :
Undisbursed portion of loans		4,372						3,984						5,520						7,724						9,237
Deferred loan fees and costs		(3,484	)					(3,519	)					(3,623	)					(3,453	)					(3,814	)
Allowance for losses		15,107						8,352						8,156						8,100						6,867
Total loans receivable, net	$	1,114,674					$	804,081					$	806,955					$	824,570					$	715,934

____________________

(1) Includes loans held for sale of $1.5 million.

(2) Includes loans held for sale of $1.6 million.

(3) Includes loans held for sale of $1.3 million.

(4) Includes loans held for sale of $2.0 million.

(5) Includes loans held for sale of $2.9 million.

The following table shows the composition of our loan portfolio by fixed- and adjustable-rate at the dates indicated.

	December 31,
	2008						2007						2006						2005						2004
	Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed-Rate Loans :
Real estate:
One- to four-family	$	261,969	(1)		23.17	%	$	254,235	(2)		31.28	%	$	271,405	(3)		33.22	%	$	305,911	(4)		36.55	%	$	262,716	(5)		38.08	%
Multi-family		2,401			0.21			3,610			0.44			4,488			0.55			4,587			0.55			3,427			.47
Commercial		115,922			10.25			17,281			2.13			9,408			1.15			9,375			1.12			6,918			.95
Construction and development		9,724			0.86			10,197			1.25			8,310			1.02			12,690			1.52			15,191			2.09
Total real estate loans		390,016			34.49			285,323			35.10			293,611			35.94			332,563			39.74			288,252			39.58

Consumer		229,326			20.28			198,068			24.37			192,715			23.59			182,784			21.84			165,895			22.78
Commercial business		37,865			3.35			19,842			2.44			27,093			3.32			20,000			2.39			16,347			2.24
Total fixed-rate loans		657,207			58.12			503,233			61.91			513,419			62.85			535,347			63.97			470,494			64.61

Adjustable-Rate Loans :
Real estate:
One- to four-family		259,395			22.94			176,783			21.75			161,718			19.79			146,003			17.44			122,962			16.89
Multi-family		297			0.03			319			0.04			585			.07			918			0.11			1,230			.17
Commercial		134,771			11.92			64,835			7.98			64,504			7.90			67,895			8.11			61,149			8.40
Construction and development		2,508			0.22			3,363			0.41			6,141			.75			10,248			1.22			5,554			.76
Total real estate loans		396,971			35.11			245,300			30.18			232,948			28.51			225,064			26.88			190,895			26.21

Consumer		39,066			3.46			27,443			3.38			30,258			3.70			32,177			3.85			29,562			4.06
Commercial business		37,425			3.31			36,922			4.53			40,383			4.94			44,353			5.30			37,273			5.12
Total adjustable-rate loans		473,462			41.88			309,665			38.09			303,589			37.15			301,594			36.03			257,730			35.39
Total loans		1,130,669	(1)		100.00	%		812,898	(2)		100.00	%		817,008	(3)		100.00	%		836,941	(4)		100.00	%		728,224	(5)		100.00	%

Less :
Undisbursed portion of loans		4,372						3,984						5,520						7,724						9,237
Deferred loan fees and costs		(3,484	)					(3,519	)					(3,623	)					(3,453	)					(3,814	)
Allowance for loan losses		15,107						8,352						8,156						8,100						6,867
Total loans receivable, net	$	1,114,674					$	804,081					$	806,955					$	824,570					$	715,934

____________________

(1) Includes loans held for sale of $1.5 million.

(2) Includes loans held for sale of $1.6 million.

(3) Includes loans held for sale of $1.3 million.

(4) Includes loans held for sale of $2.0 million.

(5) Includes loans held for sale of $2.9 million.

The following schedule illustrates the contractual maturity of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2008. Mortgages that have adjustable or renegotiable interest rates are shown as maturing in the period during which the contract is due. The schedule does not reflect the effects of possible prepayments or enforcement of due-on-sale clauses.

	Real Estate
	One- to Four-Family (1)					Multi-family and Commercial					Construction and Development (2)					Consumer					Commercial Business					Total
	Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)

Due During Years Ending December 31,

2009 (3)	$	385		7.02	%	$	69,196		5.28	%	$	1,326		6.34	%	$	8,492		6.74	%	$	35,314		3.34	%	$	114,713		4.81	%
2010		401		6.38			16,578		5.85			438		6.37			10,804		6.80			2,701		6.37			30,922		6.24
2011		532		6.02			26,635		6.38			274		7.34			17,780		7.23			7,209		5.34			52,430		6.53
2012 and 2013		10,706		5.88			46,989		6.32			496		7.97			38,110		7.08			20,507		6.73			116,808		6.61
2014 to 2015		9,351		6.11			21,562		6.76			104		8.62			18,685		7.17			4,798		6.57			54,500		6.78
2016 to 2030		151,119		5.84			69,821		6.68			1,248		6.06			173,986		7.02			4,761		6.26			400,935		6.50
2031 and following		347,329		5.90			2,610		4.95			8,346		6.13			535		5.97			—		—			358,820		5.90
Total	$	519,823		5.89	%	$	253,391		6.13	%	$	12,232		6.28	%	$	268,392		7.03	%	$	75,290		4.95	%	$	1,129,128		6.16	%

____________________

(1) Does not include mortgage loans held for sale.

(2) Once the construction phase has been completed, these loans will automatically convert to permanent financing.

(3) Includes demand loans, loans having no stated maturity and overdraft loans.

The total amount of loans due after December 31, 2009 that have predetermined interest rates is $633.1 million, and the total amount of loans due after such date which have floating or adjustable interest rates is $381.3 million.

One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate Lending. We focus our real estate lending efforts primarily on the origination of loans secured by first mortgages on owner-occupied, one- to four-family residences in our market areas. At December 31, 2008, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans totaled $521.4 million, or 46.1% of our gross loan portfolio.

We generally underwrite our one- to four-family loans based on the loan applicant’s employment and credit history and the appraised value of the subject property. Generally, we lend up to 97% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price for one- to four-family residential loans. For loans with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 80%, we generally require private mortgage insurance in order to reduce our exposure to below 80%. Properties securing our one- to four-family loans are appraised by independent state licensed fee appraisers approved by MutualBank’s Board of Directors. We require borrowers to obtain title insurance in the amount of their mortgage. Hazard insurance and flood insurance, if necessary, are required in an amount of the lesser of the value of the property improvements or our mortgage amount.

We originate one- to four-family mortgage loans on either a fixed- or adjustable-rate basis, as consumer demand dictates. Our pricing strategy for mortgage loans includes setting interest rates that are competitive with the secondary market and other local financial institutions and are consistent with our internal needs. Adjustable-rate mortgage or ARM loans are offered with a one-year, three-year, five-year, seven-year or ten-year term to the initial repricing date. After the initial period, the interest rate for each ARM loan adjusts annually for the remainder of the term of the loan. We use the weekly average of the one-year Treasury Bill Constant Maturity Index to reprice our ARM loans. During fiscal 2008, we originated $33.1 million of one- to four-family ARM loans and $78.0 million of one- to four-family fixed-rate mortgage loans. By way of comparison, prior to the merger of MFB Financial, during fiscal 2007, we originated $28.3 million of one- to four-family ARM loans and $58.3 million of one- to four-family fixed-rate mortgage loans.

Fixed-rate loans secured by one- to four-family residences have contractual maturities of up to 30 years and are generally fully amortizing, with payments due monthly. These loans normally remain outstanding, however, for a substantially shorter period of time because of refinancing and other prepayments. A significant change in interest rates could alter considerably the average life of a residential loan in our portfolio. Our one- to four-family loans are generally not assumable, do not contain prepayment penalties and do not permit negative amortization of principal. Most are written using underwriting guidelines which make them saleable in the secondary market. Our real estate loans generally contain a “due on sale” clause allowing us to declare the unpaid principal balance due and payable upon the sale of the security property.

Our one- to four-family residential ARM loans are fully amortizing loans with contractual maturities of up to 30 years, with payments due monthly. Our ARM loans generally provide for specified minimum and maximum interest rates, with a lifetime cap and floor, and a periodic adjustment on the interest rate over the rate in effect on the date of origination. As a consequence of using caps, the interest rates on these loans may not be as rate sensitive as is our cost of funds.

In order to remain competitive in our market areas, we sometimes originate ARM loans at initial rates below the fully indexed rate. ARM loans generally pose different credit risks than fixed-rate loans, primarily because as interest rates rise, the borrower’s payment rises, increasing the potential for default. Our payment history for ARM loans has not been substantially different from fixed rate loans. See “Asset Quality — Non-performing Assets” and “— Classified Assets.” At December 31, 2008, our one- to four-family ARM loan portfolio totaled $259.4 million, or 22.9% of our gross loan portfolio. At that date, the fixed-rate one- to four-family mortgage loan portfolio totaled $262.0 million, or 23.2% of our gross loan portfolio.

Multi-family and Commercial Real Estate Lending . We offer a variety of multi-family and commercial real estate loans for acquisition, renovation or construction. These loans are secured by the real estate and improvements financed. The collateral securing these loans ranges from industrial commercial buildings to churches, office buildings and multi-family housing complexes. At December 31, 2008, multi-family and commercial real estate loans totaled $253.4 million, or 22.4% of our gross loan portfolio.

Our loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate are originated with either a fixed or adjustable interest rate. The interest rate on adjustable-rate loans is based on a variety of indices, generally determined through negotiation with the borrower. Loan-to-value ratios on our multi-family and commercial real estate loans typically do not exceed 80% of the current appraised value of the property securing the loan. These loans typically require monthly payments, may not be fully amortizing and generally have maximum maturities of 25 years. Developmental loans are secured by real estate and repaid by the sale of lots.

Loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate are underwritten based on the income producing potential of the property and the financial strength of the borrower. The net operating income, which is the income derived from the operation of the property less all operating expenses, must be sufficient to cover the payments related to the outstanding debt. We may require personal guarantees of the borrowers in addition to the real estate as collateral for such loans. We also generally require an assignment of rents or leases in order to be assured that the cash flow from the real estate can be used to repay the debt. Appraisals on properties securing multi-family and commercial real estate loans are performed by independent state licensed fee appraisers approved by MutualBank’s Board of Directors. See “Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales and Repayments.”

We generally do not maintain a tax or insurance escrow account for loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate. In order to monitor the adequacy of cash flows on income-producing properties, the borrower is required to provide periodic financial information.

Loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate are generally larger and involve a greater degree of credit risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans typically involve large balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Because payments on loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. If the cash flow from the project is reduced, or if leases are not obtained or renewed, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. See “Asset Quality — Non-performing Assets.”

Construction and Development Lending . We originate construction loans primarily secured by existing residential building lots. We make construction loans to builders and to individuals for the construction of their residences. Substantially all of these loans are secured by properties located within our market area. At December 31, 2008, we had $12.2 million in construction and development loans outstanding, representing 1.1% of our gross loan portfolio.

Construction and development loans are obtained through continued business with builders who have previously borrowed from us, from walk-in customers and through referrals from realtors and architects. The application process includes submission of complete plans, specifications and costs of the project to be constructed. This information and an independent appraisal is used to determine the value of the subject property. Loans are based on the lesser of the current appraised value and/or the cost of construction, including the land and the building. We generally conduct regular inspections of the construction project being financed. Residential construction loans are done with one closing for both the construction period and the long term financing.

Construction loans for one- to four-family homes are generally granted with a construction period of up to nine months. During the construction phase, the borrower generally pays interest only on a monthly basis. Loan-to-value ratios on our construction and development loans typically do not exceed 90% of the appraised value of the project on an as completed basis. Single family construction loans with loan-to-value ratios over 80% usually require private mortgage insurance.

Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction and development costs and the market for the project upon completion, it is difficult to evaluate accurately the total loan funds required to complete a project, the related loan-to-value ratios and the likelihood of ultimate success of the project. These loans also involve many of the same risks discussed above regarding multi-family and commercial real estate loans and tend to be more sensitive to general economic conditions than many other types of loans. In addition, payment of interest from loan proceeds can make it difficult to monitor the progress of a project.

Consumer and Other Lending . Consumer loans generally have shorter terms to maturity, which reduces our exposure to changes in interest rates, and carry higher rates of interest than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. In addition, management believes that offering consumer loan products helps to expand and create stronger ties to our customer base by increasing the number of customer relationships and providing cross-marketing opportunities. At December 31, 2008, our consumer loan portfolio totaled $268.4 million, or 23.7% of our gross loan portfolio. We offer a variety of secured consumer loans, including home equity and lines of credit, home improvement, auto, boat and recreational vehicle loans, and loans secured by savings deposits. We also offer a limited amount of credit card and unsecured loans. We originate our consumer loans both in our market area and throughout Indiana with some customers residing in contiguous states through our indirect lending program.

At December 31, 2008, our home equity loans, including lines of credit and home improvement loans, totaled $111.8 million, or 9.9% of our gross loan portfolio. These loans may be originated in amounts, together with the amount of the existing first mortgage, of up to 100% of the value of the property securing the loan. The term to maturity on our home equity and home improvement loans may be up to 15 years. Most home equity lines of credit have a maximum term to maturity of 20 years and require a minimum monthly payment based on the outstanding loan balance per month, which amount may be reborrowed at any time. A limited number of home equity lines of credit are approved with monthly payments of accrued interest only. Other consumer loan terms vary according to the type of collateral, length of contract and creditworthiness of the borrower.

We directly and indirectly originate auto, boat and recreational vehicle loans. We generally buy indirect auto loans on a rate basis, paying the dealer a cash payment for loans with an interest rate in excess of the rate we require. This premium is amortized over the remaining life of the loan. As specified in written agreements with these dealers, prepayments or delinquencies are charged to future amounts owed to that dealer, with no dealer reserve or other guarantee of payment if the dealer stops doing business with us.

We employ the Fair Isaac’s credit scoring models for all consumer loan applications. These models evaluate credit and application attributes. We originate consumer loans through bank financial centers and indirect channels. These loans are underwritten traditionally, with a review of the borrower’s employment and credit history and an assessment of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan.

At December 31, 2008, auto loans totaled $22.7 million, or 2.0% of our gross loan portfolio. Auto loans may be written for up to six years and usually have a fixed rate of interest. Loan-to-value ratios are up to 100% of the MSRP or 120% of invoice for new autos and 110% of value on used cars, based on valuation from official used car guides.

Loans for boats and recreational vehicles totaled $126.8 million at December 31, 2008, or 11.2% of our gross loan portfolio. We will finance up to 100% of the purchase price for a recreational vehicle and 100% for a boat. Values are based on the applicable official used vehicle guides. The term to maturity for these types of loans is up to 15 years for new and used boats and recreational vehicles. These loans are generally written with a fixed rate of interest.

Consumer loans may entail greater risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, especially consumer loans secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles, boats and recreational vehicles. In these cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance. As a result, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and, thus, are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.

Commercial Business Lending . At December 31, 2008, commercial business loans totaled $75.3 million, or 6.7% of our gross loan portfolio. Most of our commercial business loans have been extended to finance businesses in our footprint. Credit accommodations extended include lines of credit for working capital needs, term loans to purchase capital goods and real estate, development lending to foster residential, business and community growth and agricultural lending for inventory and equipment financing.

The terms of loans extended on the security of machinery and equipment are based on the projected useful life of the machinery and equipment, generally not to exceed seven years. Lines of credit generally are available to borrowers for up to 13 months, and may be renewed by us after an annual review of current financial information.

We issue a few financial-based standby letters of credit which are offered at competitive rates and terms and are generally on a secured basis. We continue to expand our volume of commercial business loans.

Our commercial business lending policy includes credit file documentation and analysis of the borrower’s background, capacity to repay the loan, the adequacy of the borrower’s capital and collateral as well as an evaluation of other conditions affecting the borrower. Analysis of the borrower’s past, present and future cash flows also is an important aspect of our credit analysis. We may obtain personal guarantees on our commercial business loans. Nonetheless, these loans are believed to carry higher credit risk than traditional single family loans.

Unlike residential mortgage loans, commercial business loans are typically made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans may substantially depend on the success of the business itself (which, in turn, often depends in part upon general economic conditions). Our commercial business loans are usually secured by business assets. However, the collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business.

Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales and Repayments

We originate loans through referrals from real estate brokers and builders, our marketing efforts, and our existing and walk-in customers. We also originate many of our consumer loans through relationships with dealerships. While we originate both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans, our ability to originate loans depends upon customer demand for loans in our market areas. Demand is affected by local competition and the interest rate environment. During the last several years, due to low market rates of interest, our dollar volume of fixed-rate, one- to four-family loans has exceeded the dollar volume of the same type of adjustable-rate loans. As part of our interest rate risk management efforts, we have from time to time sold our fixed rate, one- to four-family residential loans. We have also purchased adjustable one- to four-family residential and commercial real estate loans.

In periods of economic uncertainty, the ability of financial institutions, including us, to originate or purchase large dollar volumes of loans may be substantially reduced or restricted, with a resultant decrease in interest income.

The following table shows our loan origination, purchase, sale and repayment activities for the years indicated.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006
	(In thousands)

Originations by type :
Adjustable rate:
Real estate - one- to four-family	$	33,083		$	28,275		$	40,838
- multi-family		1,323			—			96
- commercial		7,132			11,557			7,398
- construction or development		5,617			4,894			9,396
Non-real estate - consumer		43			56			148
- commercial business		2,061			2,026			4,507
Total adjustable-rate		49,259			46,808			62,383
Fixed rate:
Real estate - one- to four-family		78,040			58,338			59,794
- multi-family		2,052			—			—
- commercial		12,737			2,171			351
- construction or development		9,171			11,687			9,623
Non-real estate - consumer		42,465			44,423			56,086
- commercial business		5,409			3,153			8,017
Total fixed-rate		149,874			119,772			133,871
Total loans originated		199,133			166,580			196,254

Purchases : (1)
Real estate - one- to four-family		213,441			16,058			5,447
- commercial		93,479			—			—
- construction or development		1,770			—			—
Non-real estate - consumer		9,677			—			1,242
- commercial business		75,496			—			—
Total loans purchased		393,863	(2)		16,058			6,689

Sales and Repayments :
Sales:
Real estate - one- to four-family		92,914			24,113			50,853
Total loans sold		92,914			24,113			50,853
Principal repayments		179,187			162,159			174,743
Total reductions		272,101			186,272			225,596
Increase (decrease) in other items, net		(3,124	)		(476	)		2,720
Net increase (decreases)	$	317,771		$	(4,110	)	$	( 19,933	)

____________________

(1) Does not include market value adjustment for loans related to acquisitions of branches from other financial institutions.

(2) Includes $385.3 million of loans acquired as part of the Company’s acquisition of MFB.

Asset Quality

When a borrower fails to make a payment on a mortgage loan on or before the default date, a late charge and delinquency notice is mailed. All delinquent accounts are reviewed by a collector, who attempts to cure the delinquency by contacting the borrower once the loan is 30 days past due. If the loan becomes 30 days delinquent, the collector will generally contact the borrower by phone or send a letter to the borrower in order to identify the reason for the delinquency. Once the loan becomes 60 days delinquent, the borrower is asked to pay the delinquent amount in full, or establish an acceptable repayment plan to bring the loan current. Prior to foreclosure a drive-by inspection is made to determine the condition of the property. If the account becomes 120 days delinquent, and an acceptable repayment plan has not been agreed upon, a collection officer will generally refer the account to legal counsel, with instructions to prepare a notice of intent to foreclose. The notice of intent to foreclose allows the borrower up to 30 days to bring the account current. During this 30 day period, the collector may accept a repayment plan from the borrower which would bring the account current prior to foreclosure. If the loan becomes 120 days delinquent and an acceptable repayment plan has not been agreed upon, the collection officer will turn over the account to our legal counsel with instructions to initiate foreclosure. The Bank has suspended foreclosure activities when directed by government sponsored entities or the Bank’s regulator.

For consumer loans, a similar process is followed, with the initial written contact being made once the loan is 20 days past due.

Delinquent Loans. The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2008, our loans delinquent for 60 to 89 days by type, number, amount and percentage of type.

	Loans Delinquent For:
	60-89 Days
	Number		Amount		Percent of Loan Category
	(Dollars in thousands)

Real Estate:
One- to four-family		63	$	4,848		.93	%
Multi-family		1		95		3.50
Commercial		10		2,096		.84
Construction and development		—		—		—
Consumer		133		1,764		.66
Commercial business		3		328		.44

Total		210	$	9,131		.81	%

Non-performing Assets. The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of non-performing assets in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated. Generally, loans are placed on non-accrual status when the loan becomes more than 90 days delinquent or when collection of interest becomes doubtful. Foreclosed assets owned include assets acquired in settlement of loans.

	December 31,
	2008			2007			2006			2005			2004
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accruing loans:
One- to four-family	$	7,917		$	2,997		$	2,762		$	2,967		$	1,326
Multi-family		—			—			—			—			—
Commercial real estate		7,723			2,656			356			569			370
Construction and development		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		1,851			1,294			983			628			498
Commercial business		2,507			2,002			1,468			1,257			1,791
Total		19,998			8,949			5,569			5,421			3,985

Accruing loans delinquent 90 days or more:
One- to four-family		1,284			—			—			67			—
Multi-family		—			—			—			—			—
Commercial real estate		189			1,421			—			1,858			—
Construction and development		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		—			—			—			35			119
Commercial business		—			—			—			—			—
Total		1,473			1,421			—			1,960			119
Total nonperforming loans		21,471			10,370			5,569			7,381			4,104

Restructured loans		293			107			111			116			120

Foreclosed assets:
One- to four-family		1,786			927			947			912			285
Multi-family		—			—			—			—			—
Commercial real estate		1,193			437			326			595			55
Construction and development		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		1,861			1,137			1,322			978			894
Commercial business		—			—			—			—			—
Total		4,840			2,501			2,595			2,485			1,234

Total non-performing assets	$	26,604		$	12,978		$	8,275		$	9,982		$	5,458
Total as a percentage of total assets		1.92	%		1.35	%		0.86	%		1.03	%		0.65	%

For the year ended December 31, 2008, gross interest income that would have been recorded had the non-accruing loans been current in accordance with their original terms amounted to $1.4 million. The amount included in interest income on these loans for the year ended December 31, 2008, was $828,000.

At December 31, 2008, foreclosed commercial real estate consisted of two commercial buildings, one in Delaware County and one in Wabash County, which are currently being offered for sale. In addition, forty-one residential properties with a book value of $1.8 million remain as foreclosed assets at December 31, 2008. These properties are being offered for sale. Non-accruing one- to four-family loans increased to $7.9 million at December 31, 2008. Non-accruing commercial real estate loans increased from $2.7 million at December 31, 2007, to $7.7 million at December 31, 2008. At the same time, non-accrual commercial business loans increased from $2.0 million to $2.5 million. These increases are primarily a result of current economic slowdown. Management continues to monitor aggressively and it is management’s opinion that the non-accruing loans are sufficiently reserved as of December 31, 2008.

Other Loans of Concern. In addition to the non-performing assets set forth in the table above, as of December 31, 2008, there was an aggregate of $14.9 million in loans with respect to which known information about the possible credit problems of the borrowers have caused management to have doubts as to the abilities of the borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms and which may result in the future inclusion of such items in the non-performing asset categories. These loans have been considered in management’s determination of the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses. Management reviews each of these relationships at least quarterly to determine if further downgrades are prudent.

Included in the $14.9 million above are 30 commercial business loans totaling $3.9 million, 24 commercial real estate loans totaling $8.2 million and 41 residential mortgage loans totaling $2.8 million. Loans of $934,000 had specific loan loss reserves established and the majority of these loans were current as of December 31, 2008

Classified Assets. Federal regulations provide for the classification of loans and other assets, such as debt and equity securities considered by the OTS to be of lesser quality, as “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss.” An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard,” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted.

When an insured institution classifies problem assets as either substandard or doubtful, it may establish general allowances for loan losses in an amount deemed prudent by management and approved by the board of directors. General allowances represent loss allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent risk associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem assets. When an insured institution classifies problem assets as “loss,” it is required either to establish a specific allowance for losses equal to 100% of that portion of the asset so classified or to charge off such amount. An institution’s determination as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the OTS and the FDIC, which may order the establishment of additional general or specific loss allowances.

In connection with the filing of MutualBank’s periodic reports with the OTS and in accordance with our classification of assets policy, we regularly review the problem assets in our portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification in accordance with applicable regulations. On the basis of management’s review, at December 31, 2008, we had classified $30.6 million of MutualBank’s loans as substandard, $2.1 million as doubtful and $1.5 million as loss. Loans classified as loss are fully reserved but not charged off, because there are certain indications that collection is still possible. The total amount classified represented 26.20% of our stockholders’ equity and 2.46% of our assets at December 31, 2008, compared to 16.56% and 1.50%, respectively, at December 31, 2007.

Provision for Loan Losses . We recorded a provision for loan losses during the year ended December 31, 2008 of $7.0 million, compared to $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The provision for loan losses is charged to income to bring our allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on the factors discussed below under “— Allowance for Loan Losses.”

Allowance for Loan Losses . We maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on ongoing, quarterly assessments of the estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of several key elements, including the general allowance and specific allowances for identified problem loans and portfolio segments. In addition, the allowance incorporates the results of measuring impaired loans as provided in SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan” and SFAS No. 118, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan – Income Recognition and Disclosures.” These accounting standards prescribe the measurement methods, income recognition and disclosures related to impaired loans.

The general allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans based on the internal risk evaluation of such loans or pools of loans. Changes in risk evaluations of both performing and nonperforming loans affect the amount of the general allowance. Loss factors are based on our historical loss experience as well as on significant factors that, in management’s judgment, affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date.

The appropriateness of the allowance is reviewed by management based upon its evaluation of then-existing economic and business conditions affecting our key lending areas and other conditions, such as credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions), collateral values, loan volumes and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio segments and recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio that existed as of the balance sheet date and the impact that such conditions were believed to have had on the collectibility of the loan. Senior management reviews these conditions quarterly in discussions with our senior credit officers. To the extent that any of these conditions is evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s estimate of the effect of such condition may be reflected as a specific allowance applicable to such credit or portfolio segment. Where any of these conditions is not evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s evaluation of the loss related to this condition is reflected in the unallocated allowance. The evaluation of the inherent loss with respect to these conditions is subject to a higher degree of uncertainty because they are not identified with specific problem credits or portfolio segments.

The allowance for loan losses is based on estimates of losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Actual losses can vary significantly from the estimated amounts. Our methodology as described permits adjustments to any loss factor used in the computation of the general allowance in the event that, in management’s judgment, significant factors which affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date are not reflected in the loss factors. By assessing the probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis, we are able to adjust specific and inherent loss estimates based upon any more recent information that has become available. Due to the loss of numerous manufacturing jobs in the communities we serve during recent years, including 2008, and the increase in higher risk loans, like consumer and commercial loans, as a percentage of total loans, management has concluded that our allowance for loan losses should be greater than historical loss experience and specifically identified losses would otherwise indicate.

At December 31, 2008, our allowance for loan losses was $15.1 million, or 1.34% of the total loan portfolio, and approximately 69.4% of total non-performing loans. Assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is inherently subjective as it requires making material estimates, including the amount and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans, that are susceptible to significant change. In the opinion of management, the allowance, when taken as a whole, is adequate to absorb reasonable estimated loan losses inherent in our loan portfolio.

The following table sets forth an analysis of our allowance for loan losses.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006			2005			2004
	(Dollars in thousands)

Balance at beginning of period	$	8,352		$	8,156		$	8,100		$	6,867		$	6,779

Charge-offs:
One- to four-family		480			645			526			303			249
Multi-family		—			—			—			—			—
Commercial real estate		1,548			44			102			6			34
Construction and development		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		2,174			1,731			1,288			1,276			1,093
Commercial business		230			303			387			954			616
		4,432			2,723			2,303			2,539			1,992

Recoveries:
One- to four-family		42			121			81			22			21
Multi-family		—			—			—			—			—
Commercial real estate		558			—			—			120			326
Construction and development		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		556			357			199			194			176
Commercial business		57			201			11			15			—
		1,213			679			291			351			523

Net charge-offs		3,219			2,044			2,012			2,188			1,469
Amount acquired in acquisitions		2,954			—			—			1,646			—
Provisions charged to operations		7,020			2,240			2,068			1,775			1,557
Balance at end of period	$	15,107		$	8,352		$	8,156		$	8,100		$	6,867

Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period		0.34	%		0.25	%		0.24	%		0.29	%		0.21	%

Allowance as a percentage of non-performing loans		69.41	%		79.72	%		143.59	%		109.74	%		167.32	%

Allowance as a percentage of total loans (end of period)		1.34	%		1.03	%		1.00	%		0.98	%		0.95	%

The distribution of our allowance for loan losses at the dates indicated is summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2008								2007								2006								2005								2004
	(Dollars in thousands)
	Amount of Loan Loss Allowance		Loan Amounts by Category			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance		Loan Amounts by Category			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance		Loan Amounts by Category			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance		Loan Amounts by Category			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance		Loan Amounts by Category			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans

One- to four-family	$	1,997	$	521,364	1)		46.11	%	$	1,200		431,018	(2)		53.02	%	$	1,219		433,123	(3)		53.01	%	$	1,267	$	451,914	(4)		54.00	%	$	1,013		385,678	(5)		52.96	%
Multi-family		73		2,698			.24			20		3,929			0.48			61		5,073			0.62			68		5,505			.66			62		4,657			.64
Commercial real estate		6,869		250,693			22.17			2,158		82,116			10.10			2,000		73,912			9.05			2,039		77,270			9.23			1,479		68,067			9.35
Construction or development		12		12,232			1.08			14		13,560			1.67			72		14,451			1.77			115		22,938			2.74			104		20,745			2.85
Consumer		3,990		268,392			23.74			3,885		225,511			27.74			3,801		222,973			27.29			3,605		214,961			25.68			3,155		195,457			26.84
Commercial business		2,166		75,290			6.66			1,075		56,764			6.99			1,003		67,476			8.26			1,006		64,353			7.69			1,054		53,620			7.36
Unallocated		—		—			—			—		—			—			—		—			—			—		—			—			—		—			—
Total	$	15,107	$	1,130,669			100.00	%	$	8,352	$	812,898			100.00	%	$	8,156	$	817,008			100.00	%	$	8,100	$	836,941			100.00	%	$	6,867	$	728,224			100.00	%

____________________

(1) Includes loans held for sale of $1.5 million.

(2) Includes loans held for sale of $1.6 million.

(3) Includes loans held for sale of $1.3 million.

(4) Includes loans held for sale of $2.0 million.

(5) Includes loans held for sale of $2.9 million.

Investment Acti v ities

MutualBank may invest in various types of liquid assets, including United States Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies, including callable agency securities, certain certificates of deposit of insured banks and savings institutions, certain bankers’ acceptances, repurchase agreements and federal funds. Subject to various restrictions, it also may invest in investment grade commercial paper and corporate debt securities and mutual funds the assets of which conform to the investments that a federally chartered savings institution is otherwise authorized to make directly. See “How We Are Regulated - MutualBank” for a discussion of additional restrictions on our investment activities.

The Chief Financial Officer has the basic responsibility for the management of our investment portfolio, subject to the direction and guidance of the Asset and Liability Management Committee. The Chief Financial Officer considers various factors when making decisions, including the marketability, maturity and tax consequences of the proposed investment. The maturity structure of investments will be affected by various market conditions, including the current and anticipated slope of the yield curve, the level of interest rates, the trend of new deposit inflows, and the anticipated demand for funds via deposit withdrawals and loan originations and purchases.

The general objectives of our investment portfolio are to provide liquidity when loan demand is high, to assist in maintaining earnings when loan demand is low and to maximize earnings while satisfactorily managing risk, including credit risk, reinvestment risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk” in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

Our investment securities currently consist of U.S. Agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, municipal securities, marketable equity securities (which consist of shares in mutual funds that invest in government obligations, corporate obligations, mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities) and corporate obligations. See Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Our mortgage-backed securities portfolio currently consists of securities issued under government-sponsored agency programs.

While mortgage-backed securities carry a reduced credit risk as compared to whole loans, these securities remain subject to the risk that a fluctuating interest rate environment, along with other factors like the geographic distribution of the underlying mortgage loans, may alter the prepayment rate of the mortgage loans and affect both the prepayment speed and value of the securities.

In the past, we also have maintained a trading portfolio of U.S. Government securities. We are permitted by the board of directors to have a portfolio of up to $5.0 million and to trade up to $2.0 million in these securities at any one time. At December 31, 2008, however, we did not have a trading portfolio. See Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Effective June 30, 2007, MutualBank transferred the management of a portion of its securities portfolio to its wholly owned subsidiary, Mutual Federal Investment Company. Mutual Federal Investment Company, a Nevada corporation, holds, services, manages and invests that portion of the Bank’s investment portfolio as may be transferred from time to time by the Bank to Mutual Federal Investment Company. Mutual Federal Investment Company’s investment policy, for the most part, mirrors that of the Bank. At December 31, 2008, MutualBank had $86.9 million in consolidated investment securities. The portfolio is comprised of $77.2 million in investments held for sale and $9.7 in investments held to maturity. Mutual Federal Investment Company managed $75.7 million of the total held for sale portfolio.

MutualBank evaluates all securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on a quarterly basis. During the year ending December 31, 2008, the Bank determined that three securities met the definition of OTTI. The first security was a Lehman’s corporate bond that was written down $200,000. The other two securities were trust preferred securities that had a total write-down of $1.2 million. Impairment on these securities was determined after analyzing the underlying collateral and determining the amount of additional losses needed to create a shortfall in interest or principal payments. All trust preferred securities were priced using a discounted cash flow analysis as of December 31, 2008.

MutualBank has investments in eight separate Indiana limited partnerships that were organized to construct, own and operate two multi-unit apartment complexes in the Indianapolis area, one in Findley, Ohio, two in Goshen, Indiana, one in Elkhart, Indiana, and two in Niles, Michigan (the Pedcor Projects). The general partner in each of these Pedcor Projects is Pedcor Investments. All of the Pedcor Projects are operated as multi-family, low and moderate-income housing projects, and have been performing as planned for several years. At the inception of the Findley, Ohio Pedcor Project in February 1998, we invested $2.1 million and committed to invest an additional $1.9 million. As of December 31, 2008, $647,000 of this commitment remained payable over the next two years.

A low and moderate-income housing project qualifies for certain federal income tax credits if (1) it is a residential rental property, (2) the units are used on a non-transient basis, and (3) at least 20% of the units in the project are occupied by tenants whose incomes are 50% or less of the area median gross income, adjusted for family size, or alternatively, at least 40% of the units in the project are occupied by tenants whose incomes are 60% or less of the area median gross income. Qualified low-income housing projects generally must comply with these and other rules for 15 years, beginning with the first year the project qualified for the tax credit, or some or all of the tax credit together with interest may be recaptured. The tax credit is subject to the limitation as the use of general business credit, but no basis reduction is required for any portion of the tax credit claimed. As of December 31, 2008, at least 85% of the units in the Pedcor Projects were occupied, and all of the tenants met the income test required for the tax credits.

We received tax credits totaling $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, $811,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007, and $801,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 from the Pedcor Projects. The Pedcor Projects have incurred operating losses in the early years of their operations primarily due to accelerated depreciation of assets. We have accounted for our investment in the Pedcor Projects on the equity method. Accordingly, we have recorded our share of these losses as reductions to MutualBank’s investment in the Pedcor Projects.

The following summarizes MutualBank’s equity in the Pedcor Projects’ losses and tax credits recognized in our consolidated financial statements.

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006
	(In thousands)

Investments in Pedcor low income housing projects	$	4,561		$	3,246		$	3,461

Equity in losses, net of income tax effect	$	(104	)	$	(66	)	$	(109	)
Tax credit		1,214			811			801
Increase in after-tax income from Pedcor Investments	$	1,110		$	745		$	692

See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding our limited partnership investments.

The following table sets forth the composition of our investment and mortgage-related securities portfolio and other investments at the dates indicated. As of December 31, 2008, our investment securities portfolio did not contain securities of any issuer with an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our equity capital, excluding those issued by the United States Government or its agencies.

	December 31,
	2008				2007				2006
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)

Investment securities available-for -sale:
Mutual funds	$	1,635	$	1,497	$	16,382	$	15,914	$	16,206	$	15,817
Government sponsored entities		570		572		608		605		1,117		1,099
Mortgage-backed securities		14,771		15,163		2,310		2,352		3,146		3,156
Collateralized mortgage obligations		43,821		43,639		8,327		8,322		6,860		6,762
Corporate obligations		18,797		15,527		16,655		16,399		14,332		14,236
Municipal obligations		857		857		—		—		—		—
Total investment securities held for sale		80,451		77,255		44,282		43,592		41,661		41,070

Investment securities held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities		5,498		4,983		—		—		—		—
Collateralized mortgage obligations		4,178		3,545		—		—		—		—
Total investment securities held to maturity		9,676		8,528		—		—		—		—

Investment in limited partnerships		4,561		N/A		3,246		N/A		3,461		N/A
Investment in insurance company		590		N/A		590		N/A		590		N/A
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		18,632		N/A		10,037		N/A		9,938		N/A

Total investments	$	113,910	$	85,783	$	58,155	$	43,592	$	55,650	$	41,070

The following table indicates, as of December 31, 2008, the composition and maturities of our investment securities, excluding Federal Home Loan Bank stock.

	Due in
	Less Than 1 Year			1 to 5 Years			5 to 10 Years				Over 10 Years			Total Investment Securities
	Amortized Cost			Amortized Cost			Amortized Cost				Amortized Cost			Amortized Cost			Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands)

Available-for-sale:
Corporate obligations	$	1,800		$	8,009			$	—		$	8,988		$	18,797		$	15,527
Government sponsored entities		—			—				560			867			1,427			1,429
Mutual funds		1,635			—				—			—			1,635			1,497
Mortgage-backed securities:
Freddie Mac		—			22				39			28,055			28,116			28,708
Fannie Mae		—			1,126				1,197			15,642			17,965			21,076
Ginnie Mae		—			—				—			164			164			167
Other		—			279				2,618			9,450			12,347			8,851
	$	3,435		$	9,436			$	4,414		$	63,166		$	80,451		$	77,255

Weighted average yield		3.23	%		5.24	%			5.58	%		5.66	%		5.55	%

Held-to-maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Freddie Mac	$	—		$	—			$	—		$	856		$	856		$	847
Fannie Mae		—			—				—			2,597			2,597			2,554
Other		—			206				—			6,017			6,223			5,127
	$	—		$	206			$	—		$	9,470		$	9,676		$	8,528

Weighted average yield					5.31	%						4.68	%		4.71	%

Sources of Funds

General. Our sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, payment of principal and interest on loans, interest earned on or maturation of other investment securities and funds provided from operations.

Deposits . We offer deposit accounts to consumers and businesses having a wide range of interest rates and terms. Our deposits consist of savings deposit accounts, NOW and demand accounts and certificates of deposit. We solicit deposits in our market areas. We primarily rely on competitive pricing policies, marketing and customer service to attract and retain these deposits. Beginning in 2005, we began accepting brokered deposits. We receive these deposits from one broker without paying a fee to that broker. At December 31, 2008, our brokered deposits totaled $6.0 million with an average interest rate of 3.76% and a seven-month weighted average maturity.

The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market and prevailing interest rates, and competition. The variety of our deposit accounts has allowed us to be competitive in obtaining funds and to respond to changes in consumer demand. We have become more susceptible to short-term fluctuations in deposit flows, as customers have become more interest rate conscious. We try to manage the pricing of our deposits in keeping with our asset/liability management, liquidity and profitability objectives, subject to competitive factors. Based on our experience, we believe that our deposits are relatively stable sources of funds. Our ability to attract and maintain these deposits, however, and the rates paid on them, has been and will continue to be affected significantly by market conditions.

The Federal Reserve Board requires all depository institutions to maintain non-interest bearing reserves at specified levels against their transaction accounts, primarily checking, NOW and Super NOW checking accounts. At December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with these reserve requirements.

The following table sets forth the dollar amount of savings deposits in the various types of deposit programs we offered at the dates indicated.

	December 31,
	2008						2007					2006
	Amount			Percent of Total			Amount		Percent of Total			Amount		Percent of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)

Transactions and Savings Deposits :

Noninterest bearing accounts	$	93,393			9.70	%	$	47,172		7.08	%	$	47,142		6.70	%
Passbook accounts		79,111			8.22			50,388		7.56			55,750		7.93
Interest-bearing NOW and demand accounts		156,787			16.29			117,863		17.69			107,963		15.35
Money market accounts		47,584			4.94			22,664		3.40			27,788		3.95
Total non-certificates		376,875			39.16			238,087		35.73			238,643		33.93

Certificates :

0.00 - 1.99%		55,064			5.72			8,627		1.29			15,772		2. 24
2.00 - 3.99%		359,899			37.39			47,500		7.13			82,621		11.75
4.00 - 5.99%		170,611			17.73			372,145		55.84			366,284		52.07
6.00 - 7.99%		65			0.01			48		0.01			39		0.01
8.00 - 9.99%		—			—			—		—			—		—
10.00% and over		—			—			—		—			—		—

Total certificates		585,639			60.84			428,320		64.27			464,716		66.07
Total deposits	$	962,514	(1)		100.00	%	$	666,407		100.00	%	$	703,359		100.00	%

(1) Includes $332.1 million due to MFB acquisition

The following table shows rate and maturity information for our certificates of deposit as of December 31, 2008.

		1.00- 1.99%			2.00- 3.99%			4.00- 5.99%			6.00- 7.99%		Total			Percent of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Certificate accounts maturing in quarter ending:
March 31, 2009	$	30,049		$	70,961		$	44,084		$	—		$	145,094			24.78	%
June 30, 2009		8,900			58,986			14,569			—			82,455			14.07	%
September 30, 2009		7,618			60,772			7,454			—			75,844			12.95	%
December 31, 2009		8,497			40,677			4,363			8			53,545			9.15	%
March 31, 2010		—			36,167			11,972			—			48,139			8.22	%
June 30, 2010		—			16,061			10,659			—			26,720			4.56	%
September 30, 2010		—			2,422			5,224			—			7,646			1.31	%
December 31, 2010		—			3,729			2,015			—			5,744			0.98	%
March 31, 2011		—			6,329			1,299			—			7,628			1.30	%
June 30, 2011		—			16,117			2,263			—			18,380			3.14	%
September 30, 2011		—			18,255			2,766			—			21,021			3.59	%
December 31, 2011		—			21,628			5,672			58			27,358			4.67	%
Thereafter		—			7,795			58,270			—			66,065			11.28	%

Total	$	55,064		$	359,899		$	170,610		$	66		$	585,639			100.00	%

Percent of total		9.40	%		61.46	%		29.13	%		0.01	%		100.00	%

The following table indicates, as of December 31, 2008, the amount of our certificates of deposit and other deposits by time remaining until maturity.

	Maturity
	3 Months or Less		Over 3 to 6 Months		Over 6 to 12 Months		Over 12 months		Total
	(In thousands)

Certificates of deposit less than $100,000	$	96,596	$	57,228	$	79,434	$	159,936	$	393,194

Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more		35,759		25,209		48,851		67,036		176,855

Public funds (1)		12,740		18		1,105		1,727		15,590

Total certificates of deposit	$	145,095	$	82,455	$	129,390	$	228,699	$	585,639

_______________

(1) Deposits from governmental and other public entities.

Borrowings . Although deposits are our primary source of funds, we utilize borrowings when they are a less costly source of funds and can be invested at a positive interest rate spread, when we desire additional capacity to fund loan demand or when they meet our asset/liability management goals. Our borrowings historically have consisted of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis. See Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

We may obtain advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis upon the security of certain of our mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities. These advances may be made pursuant to several different credit programs, each of which has its own interest rate, range of maturities and call features. At December 31, 2008, we had $263.1 million in Federal Home Loan Bank advances outstanding. Based on current collateral levels we could borrow an additional $73.6 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank at prevailing interest rates. We believe that we will continue to have sufficient funds, through deposits and borrowings, to meet our current commitments. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Commitments” contained in Item 7 of this Form 10-K. See Note 14 to Consolidated Financial Statements.

We also have a term note with a balance of $11.5 million and a revolving line of credit with a balance of $0 from Bank of America as of December 31, 2008. See Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

We also are authorized to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s “discount window” after we have exhausted other reasonable alternative sources of funds, including Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings. We have never borrowed from our Federal Reserve Bank.

The Company acquired $5.0 million of issued trust preferred securities as part of the acquisition of MFB. The net balance of the note as of December 31, 2008 was $3.8 million due to the purchase accounting adjustment from the acquisition. The securities mature 30 years from the date of issuance, July 29, 2005. The securities bear a fixed rate of interest of 6.22% for the first five years, resetting quarterly thereafter at the prevailing three-month LIBOR rate plus 170 basis points. The Company may redeem the trust preferred securities, in whole or in part, without penalty, on or after September 15, 2010, or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events with the payment of a premium upon redemption. These securities mature on September 15, 2035.

The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, the maximum month-end balance and average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008		2007		2006
	(In thousands)

Maximum Balance :
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	$	300,147	$	191,675	$	193,345
Notes payable		1,123		1,427		1,784
Other borrowings		15,967		4,311		—

Average Balance :
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	$	224,822	$	157,309	$	168,001
Notes payable		718		1,160		1,635
Other borrowings		7,967		155		—

The following table sets forth certain information as to our borrowings at the dates indicated.

	December 31,
	2008			2007			2006
	(Dollars in thousands)


Federal Home Loan Bank advances	$	263,113		$	191,675		$	157,425
Notes payable		647			1,055			1,427
Other borrowings		15,345			3,908			——

Total borrowings	$	279,105		$	196,638		$	158,852

Weighted average interest rate of FHLB advances		4.27	%		4.88	%		4.67	%

Weighted average interest rate of notes payable (1)		—			—			—

Weighted average interest rate of other borrowings (2)		5.28	%		6.48	%		—

_______________________

(1) Our notes payable are capitalized loans with no current interest expense as of December 31, 2008.

(2) Our other borrowings are a line of credit, term loan and subordinate debt as of December 31, 2008.

Subsidiary and Other Activities

As a federally chartered savings bank, MutualBank is permitted by OTS regulations to invest up to 2% of its assets, or $27.8 million at December 31, 2008, in the stock of, or unsecured loans to, service corporation subsidiaries. MutualBank may invest an additional 1% of its assets in service corporations where such additional funds are used for inner-city or community development purposes. Service corporations may engage in activities not permitted for MutualBank and are not required to be controlled by MutualBank. MutualBank also is authorized to invest an unlimited amount in operating subsidiaries that only may engage in activities authorized for MutualBank and must be controlled by MutualBank.

The Bank's insurance agency subsidiary, Mishawaka Financial Services, Inc. ("MFB Insurance"), was acquired in the MFB transaction and currently is engaged in the sale of life insurance and credit-life and health insurance, as agent to the Bank's customers and the general public.

The Bank acquired three additional wholly-owned subsidiaries in the MFB transaction, which manage a portion of its investment portfolio. MFB Investments I, Inc. and MFB Investments II, Inc. are Nevada corporations that jointly own MFB Investments, LP, a Nevada limited partnership that holds and manages investment securities previously owned by MFB Financial prior to the MFB transaction. As of December 31, 2008, these subsidiaries were merged with Mutual Federal Investment Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of MutualBank. The Bank also acquired Community Wealth Management Group, Inc. a subsidiary of MFB Financial. This subsidiary was dissolved and is the MutualWealth division of the Bank.

At December 31, 2008, MutualBank had two active subsidiaries, First M.F.S.B. Corporation, which is a service corporation and Mutual Federal Investment Company, which is an operating subsidiary. The assets of First M.F.S.B. consists of an investment in Family Financial Holdings, Inc., which is an Indiana Corporation that provides debt cancellation products to financial institutions. As of December 31, 2008, MutualBank’s total investment in this subsidiary was $590,000. For the year ended December 31, 2008, First M.F.S.B. reported no income. Mutual Federal Investment Company is a Nevada corporation that holds and manages a portion of MutualBank’s investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2008, the market value of securities managed is $75.7 million. Mutual Federal Investment Company has one active subsidiary, MutualBank REIT, Inc. MutualBank REIT, Inc. is a Maryland corporation holding approximately $116.1 million in one-to four-family mortgage loans.

On January 25, 2003, MutualFirst purchased 26.9% of Indiana Title Insurance Co., LLC (“ITIC”), a full service title insurance company. In 2008, MutualFirst sold its share of ITIC for a loss of $329,000.

Competition

We face strong competition in originating real estate and other loans and in attracting deposits. Competition in originating real estate loans comes primarily from other savings institutions, commercial banks, credit unions and mortgage bankers. Other savings institutions, commercial banks, credit unions and finance companies provide vigorous competition in consumer lending.

We attract our deposits through our branch office system. Competition for deposits comes principally from other savings institutions, commercial banks and credit unions located in the same community, as well as mutual funds and other alternative investments. We compete for deposits by offering superior service and a variety of account types at competitive rates.

Employees

At December 31, 2008, we had a total of 365 full-time and 73 part-time employees. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management considers its employee relations to be good.

How We Are Regulated

Set forth below is a brief description of certain laws and regulations that apply to us. This description, as well as other descriptions of laws and regulations contained in this Form 10-K, is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable laws and regulations.

Legislation is introduced from time to time in the United States Congress that may affect our operations. In addition, the regulations by which we are governed may be amended from time to time. Any such legislation or regulatory changes could adversely affect us. We cannot assure you as to whether or in what form any such changes will occur.

Recent Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives to Address Financial and Economic Crises

The Congress, Treasury Department and the federal banking regulators, including the FDIC, have taken broad action since early September to address volatility in the U.S. banking system.

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) authorizes the Treasury Department to purchase from financial institutions and their holding companies up to $700 billion in mortgage loans, mortgage-related securities and certain other financial instruments, including debt and equity securities issued by financial institutions and their holding companies in a troubled asset relief program (”TARP”). The purpose of TARP is to restore confidence and stability to the U.S. banking system and to encourage financial institutions to increase their lending to customers and to each other. The Treasury Department has allocated $250 billion towards the TARP Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”). Under the CPP, Treasury will purchase debt or equity securities from participating institutions. The TARP also will include direct purchases or guarantees of troubled asset of financial institutions. Participants in the CPP are subject to executive compensation limits and are encouraged to expand their lending and mortgage loan modifications.

EESA also increased FDIC deposit insurance on most accounts from $100,000 to $250,000. This increase is in place until the end of 2009 and is not covered by deposit insurance premiums paid by the banking industry.

Following a systemic risk determination, the FDIC established a Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”) in October 2008. Under the interim rule for the TLGP, there are two parts to the program: the Debt Guarantee Program (“DGP”) and the Transaction Account Guarantee Program (“TAGP”). Eligible entities continue to participate unless they opted out on or before December 5, 2008.

For the DGP, eligible entities are generally US bank holding companies, savings and loan holding companies, and FDIC-insured institutions. Under the DGP, the FDIC guarantees new senior unsecured debt of an eligible entity issued not later than June 30, 2009 and if an application is approved, guarantees certain mandatory convertible debt.

For the TAGP, eligible entities are FDIC-insured institutions. Under the TAGP, the FDIC, provides unlimited deposit insurance coverage through December 31, 2009 for non-interest bearing transaction accounts (typically business checking accounts), NOW accounts bearing interst at 0.5% or less, and certain funds swept into noninterest-bearing savings accounts. NOW accounts and money market deposit accounts are not covered. Participating institutions pay fees of 10 basis points (annualized) on the balance of each covered account in excess of $250,000 during the period through December 31, 2009.

MutualFirst . Pursuant to regulations of the OTS and the terms of MutualFirst ’s Maryland articles of incorporation, the purpose and powers of MutualFirst are to pursue any or all of the lawful objectives of a thrift holding company and to exercise any of the powers accorded to a thrift holding company.

MutualFirst is a unitary savings and loan holding company subject to regulatory oversight by the OTS. MutualFirst is required to register and file reports with the OTS and is subject to regulation and examination by the OTS. In addition, the OTS has enforcement authority over us and our non-savings institution subsidiaries.

MutualFirst generally is not subject to activity restrictions. If MutualFirst acquired control of another savings institution as a separate subsidiary, it would become a multiple savings and loan holding company, and its activities and any of its subsidiaries (other than MutualBank or any other savings institution) would generally become subject to additional restrictions.

If MutualBank fails the qualified thrift lender test described below, MutualFirst must obtain the approval of the OTS prior to continuing, directly or through other subsidiaries, any business activity other than those approved for multiple thrift holding companies or their subsidiaries. In addition, within one year of such failure MutualFirst must register as, and will become subject to, the restrictions applicable to bank holding companies. The activities authorized for a bank holding company are more limited than the activities authorized for a unitary or multiple thrift holding company.

MutualBank . MutualBank, as a federally chartered savings institution, is subject to federal regulation, periodic examination and oversight by the OTS extending to all aspects of MutualBank’s operations. MutualBank also is subject to regulation and examination by the FDIC, which insures the deposits of MutualBank to the maximum extent permitted by law. This regulation and supervision primarily is intended for the protection of depositors and not for the purpose of protecting stockholders.

The investment and lending authority of federal savings institutions are prescribed by federal laws and regulations, and federal savings institutions are prohibited from engaging in any activities not permitted by such laws and regulations. In addition, all savings institutions, including MutualBank, are required to maintain qualified thrift lender status to avoid certain restrictions on their operations. This status is maintained by meeting the OTS qualified thrift lender test, which requires a savings institution to have at least 65% of its portfolio assets, as defined by regulation, in qualified thrift investments on a monthly average for nine out of every 12 months on a rolling basis. As an alternative, the savings institution may maintain 60% of its assets in the assets specified in Section 7701(a)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under either test, such assets primarily consist of residential housing related loans and investments. At December 31, 2008, MutualBank met the test and has met the test since its effectiveness. If MutualBank loses qualified thrift status, it becomes subject to national bank investment and activity limits.

The OTS regularly examines MutualBank and prepares reports for the consideration of MutualBank’s board of directors on any deficiencies that it may find in MutualBank’s operations. When these examinations are conducted, the examiners may require MutualBank to provide for higher general or specific loan loss reserves. MutualBank’s relationship with its depositors and borrowers also is regulated to a great extent by both Federal and state laws, especially in such matters as the ownership of savings accounts and the form and content of MutualBank’s mortgage requirements. The OTS also has extensive enforcement authority over all savings institutions and their holding companies, including MutualBank and MutualFirst .

MutualBank’s general permissible lending limit for loans-to-one-borrower is equal to the greater of $500,000 or 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus (except for loans fully secured by certain readily marketable collateral, in which case this limit is increased to 25% of unimpaired capital and surplus). At December 31, 2008 MutualBank’s lending limit under this restriction was $22.5 million. MutualBank is in compliance with the loans-to-one-borrower limitation.

The OTS, as well as the other federal banking agencies, has adopted guidelines establishing safety and soundness standards on such matters as loan underwriting and documentation, asset quality, earnings standards, internal controls and audit systems, interest rate risk exposure and compensation and other employee benefits. Any institution which fails to comply with these standards must submit a compliance plan.

FDIC Regulation and Insurance of Accounts. The Bank’s deposits are insured up to the applicable limits by the FDIC, and such insurance is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government. As insurer, the FDIC imposes deposit insurance premiums and is authorized to conduct examinations of and to require reporting by FDIC-insured institutions. Our deposit insurance premiums for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $512,000. Those premiums will increase in 2009 due to recent strains on the FDIC deposit insurance fund due to the cost of large bank failures and increase in the number of troubled banks.

In February 2009, the FDIC issued new deposit premium regulations providing for increases in premiums, higher premiums for institutions with secured debt (including FHLBank advances) and brokered deposits, and a special assessment in the second quarter of 2009 to replenish the fund. Under these new deposit insurance premium regulations, the FDIC assesses deposit insurance premiums on all FDIC-insured institutions quarterly based on annualized rates for four risk categories. Each institution is assigned to one of four risk categories based on its capital, supervisory ratings and other factors. Well capitalized institutions that are financially sound with only a few minor weaknesses are assigned to Risk Category I. Risk Categories II, III and IV present progressively greater risks to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). Under FDIC’s risk-based assessment rules, effective April 1, 2009, the initial base assessment rates prior to adjustments range from 12 to 16 basis points for Risk Category I, and are 22 basis points for Risk Category II, 32 basis points for Risk Category III, and 45 basis points for Risk Category IV. Initial base assessment rates are subject to adjustments based on an institution’s unsecured debt, secured liabilities and brokered deposits, such that the total base assessment rates after adjustments range from 7 to 24 basis points for Risk Category I, 17 to 43 basis points for Risk Category II, 27 to 58 basis points for Risk Category III, and 40 to 77.5 basis points for Risk Category IV.

The rule also includes authority for the FDIC to increase or decrease total base assessment rates in the future by as much as three basis points without formal rulemaking proceeding.

In addition to the regular quarterly assessments, due to losses and projected losses attributed to failed institutions, the FDIC has adopted a rule imposing on every insured institution a special assessment equal to 20 basis points of its assessment base as of June 30, 2009, to be collected on September 30, 2009. The FDIC has indicated that, if its borrowing authority from the United States Treasury is increased, it would reduce the special assessment to 10 basis points. There is legislation pending to increase that borrowing authority from $30 billion to $100 billion (and up to $500 billion under special circumstances). The special assessment rule also authorizes the FDIC to impose additional special assessments if the reserve ratio of the DIF is estimated to fall to a level that the FDIC’s board believes would adversely affect public confidence or that is close to zero or negative. Any additional special assessment would be in an amount up to 10 basis points on the assessment base for the quarter in which it is imposed and would be collected at the end of the following quarter.

The FDIC also may prohibit any FDIC-insured institution from engaging in any activity that it determines by regulation or order to pose a serious risk to the deposit insurance fund. The FDIC also has the authority to initiate enforcement actions against the Bank and may terminate our deposit insurance if it determines that we have engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or is in an unsafe or unsound condition.

Regulatory Capital Requirements. Federally insured savings institutions, such as MutualBank, are required to maintain a minimum level of regulatory capital. The OTS has established capital standards, including a leverage ratio or core capital requirement and a risk-based capital requirement applicable to such savings institutions. These capital requirements must be generally as stringent as the comparable capital requirements for national banks. The OTS also may impose capital requirements in excess of these standards on individual institutions on a case-by-case basis.

The capital standards generally require core capital equal to at least 4.0% of adjusted total assets. Core capital consists of tangible capital plus certain intangible assets, including a limited amount of purchased credit card relationships. At December 31, 2008, MutualBank had core capital equal to $136.6 million, or 9.86% of adjusted total assets, which is $81.2 million above the minimum requirement of 4% in effect on that date.

The OTS also requires savings institutions to have total capital of at least 8.0% of risk-weighted assets. Total capital consists of core capital, as defined above, and supplementary capital. Supplementary capital consists of certain permanent and maturing capital instruments that do not qualify as core capital and general valuation loan and lease loss allowances up to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. The OTS is also authorized to require a savings institution to maintain an additional amount of total capital to account for concentration of credit risk and the risk of non-traditional activities. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet items, will be multiplied by a risk weight, ranging from 0% to 100%, based on the risk inherent in the type of asset. As of December 31, 2008, MutualBank had total risk-based capital of $150.2 million and risk-weighted assets of $1.1 billion; or total capital of 13.79% of risk-weighted assets. This amount was $63.1 million above the 8% requirement in effect on that date.

The OTS and the FDIC are authorized and, under certain circumstances, required to take actions against savings institutions that fail to meet their capital requirements. The OTS is generally required to restrict the activities of an “undercapitalized institution,” which is an institution with less than either a 4% core capital ratio, a 4% Tier 1 risked-based capital ratio or an 8.0% risk-based capital ratio. Any such institution must submit a capital restoration plan and, until such plan is approved by the OTS, may not increase its assets, acquire another institution, establish a branch or engage in any new activities, and generally may not make capital distributions.

Any savings institution that fails to comply with its capital plan or has Tier 1 risk-based or core capital ratio of less than 3.0% or a risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0% and is considered “significantly undercapitalized” must be made subject to one or more additional specified actions and operating restrictions which may cover all aspects of its operations and may include a forced merger or acquisition of the institution. An institution that becomes “critically undercapitalized” because it has a tangible capital ratio of 2.0% or less is subject to further restrictions on its activities in addition to those applicable to significantly undercapitalized institutions. In addition, the OTS must appoint a receiver, or conservator with the concurrence of the FDIC, for a savings institution, with certain limited exceptions, within 90 days after it becomes critically undercapitalized. Any undercapitalized institution is also subject to the general enforcement authority of the OTS and the FDIC, including the appointment of a conservator or a receiver.

The OTS is also generally authorized to reclassify an institution into a lower capital category and impose the restrictions applicable to such category if the institution is engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or is in an unsafe or unsound condition.

The imposition by the OTS or the FDIC of any of these measures on MutualBank may have a substantial adverse effect on our operations and profitability.

Limitations on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions . OTS regulations impose various restrictions on distributions of capital, which include dividends, stock redemptions or repurchases, cash-out mergers and other transactions charged to the capital account.

Generally, for savings institutions, such as MutualBank, it is required that before and after the proposed distribution the institution remain well-capitalized. Savings institutions may make capital distributions during any calendar year equal to the greater of 100% of net income for the year-to-date plus retained net income for the two preceding years. However, an institution deemed to be in need of more than normal supervision by the OTS may have its dividend authority restricted by the OTS. MutualBank may pay dividends in accordance with this general authority.

Savings institutions proposing to make any capital distribution need not submit written notice to the OTS prior to such distribution unless they are a subsidiary of a holding company or would not remain well-capitalized following the distribution. Savings institutions that do not, or would not meet their current minimum capital requirements following a proposed capital distribution or propose to exceed these net income limitations must obtain OTS approval prior to making such distribution. The OTS may object to the distribution during that 30-day period based on safety and soundness concerns. See “- Regulatory Capital Requirements.”

Our ability to pay dividends on or repurchase our common stock is subject to limits due to our participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. See “General” and Item 1A.

Federal Taxation

General. We are subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed below. The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize certain pertinent federal income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to us. MutualBank’s federal income tax returns have been closed without audit by the IRS through its year ended December 31, 2004. MutualFirst and MutualBank will file a consolidated federal income tax return for fiscal year 2008.

Taxable Distributions and Recapture. Prior to 1998, bad debt reserves created prior to the year ended December 31, 1997 were subject to recapture into taxable income if MutualBank failed to meet certain thrift asset and definitional tests. Federal legislation eliminated these thrift recapture rules. However, under current law, pre-1988 reserves remain subject to recapture should MutualBank make certain non-dividend distributions or cease to maintain a thrift/bank charter.

Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue Code imposes an alternative minimum tax at a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain tax preferences, called alternative minimum taxable income. The alternative minimum tax is payable to the extent such alternative minimum taxable income is in excess of an exemption amount. Net operating losses can offset no more than 90% of alternative minimum taxable income. Certain payments of alternative minimum tax may be used as credits against regular tax liabilities in future years. MutualBank is subject to the alternative minimum tax, and has $173,000 available as credits for carryover.

Corporate Dividends-Received Deduction. MutualFirst may eliminate from its income dividends received from MutualBank as a wholly owned subsidiary of MutualFirst if it elects to file a consolidated return with MutualBank. The corporate dividends-received deduction is 100% or 80%, in the case of dividends received from corporations with which a corporate recipient does not file a consolidated tax return, depending on the level of stock ownership of the payor of the dividend. Corporations which own less than 20% of the stock of a corporation distributing a dividend may deduct 70% of dividends received or accrued on their behalf.

State Taxation

MutualBank is subject to Indiana’s financial institutions tax, which is imposed at a flat rate of 8.5% on “adjusted gross income” apportioned to Indiana. “Adjusted gross income,” for purposes of the financial institutions tax, begins with taxable income as defined by Section 63 of the Internal Revenue Code and incorporates federal tax law to the extent that it affects the computation of taxable income. Federal taxable income is then adjusted by several Indiana modifications including only considering members of the combined group which have Indiana nexus.

Other applicable state taxes include generally applicable sales and use taxes plus real and personal property taxes.

Internet Website

We maintain a website with the address of www.bankwithmutual.com. The information contained on our website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other reports, proxy statements and other information, including earnings press releases, filed with the SEC are available on that website through a link to the SEC’s website at “Resource Center – Investor Relations - SEC Filings.” For more information regarding access to these filings on our website, please contact our Corporate Secretary, MutualFirst Financial, Inc., 110 E. Charles Street, Muncie, Indiana, 47305-2419; telephone number (765) 747-2800.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following are certain risk factors that could impact our business, financial results and results of operations. Investing in our common stock involves risks, including those described below. These risk factors should be considered by prospective and current investors in our common stock when evaluating the disclosures in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (particularly the forward-looking statements.) These risk factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. If the risks we face, including those listed below, actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively impacted, and the trading price of our common stock could decline, which may cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

Difficult market conditions and economic trends have adversely affected our industry and our business.

Dramatic declines in the housing market, with decreasing home prices and increasing delinquencies and foreclosures, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage and construction loans and resulted in significant write-downs of assets by many financial institutions. In addition, the values of real estate collateral supporting many loans have declined and may continue to decline. General downward economic trends, reduced availability of commercial credit and increasing unemployment have negatively affected the credit performance of commercial and consumer credit, resulting in additional write-downs. Concerns over the stability of the financial markets and the economy have resulted in decreased lending by some financial institutions to their customers and to each other. This market turmoil and tightening of credit has led to increased commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of customer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction in general business activity. Competition among depository institutions for deposits has increased significantly. Some financial institutions have experienced decreased access to deposits and/or borrowings.

The resulting economic pressure on consumers and businesses and the lack of confidence in the financial markets may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.

Our ability to assess the creditworthiness of customers and to estimate the losses inherent in our credit exposure is made more complex by these difficult market and economic conditions. As a result of the foregoing factors, there is a potential for new laws and regulations regarding lending and funding practices and liquidity standards, and bank regulatory agencies are expected to be very aggressive in responding to concerns and trends identified in examinations. This increased government action may increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue certain business opportunities. We also may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the recently increased level, because financial institution failures resulting from the depressed market conditions have depleted and may continue to deplete the deposit insurance fund and reduce its ratio of reserves to insured deposits.

We do not believe these difficult conditions are likely to improve in the near future. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market and economic conditions on us, our customers and the other financial institutions in our market area. As a result, we may experience increases in foreclosures, delinquencies and customer bankruptcies, as well as more restricted access to funds.

Recent legislative and regulatory initiatives to address difficult market and economic conditions may not stabilize the U.S. banking system.

The recently enacted Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) authorizes Treasury to purchase from financial institutions and their holding companies up to $700 billion in mortgage loans, mortgage-related securities and certain other financial instruments, including debt and equity securities issued by financial institutions and their holding companies, under a troubled asset relief program, or “TARP.” The purpose of TARP is to restore confidence and stability to the U.S. banking system and to encourage financial institutions to increase their lending to customers and to each other. The Treasury has allocated $250 billion towards the TARP Capital Purchase Program. Under the TARP Capital Purchase Program, Treasury is purchasing equity securities from participating institutions. The warrant offered by this prospectus, together with our Series A Preferred Stock, was issued by us to Treasury pursuant to the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The EESA also increased federal deposit insurance on most deposit accounts from $100,000 to $250,000. This increase is in place until the end of 2009 and is not covered by deposit insurance premiums paid by the banking industry.

The EESA followed, and has been followed by, numerous actions by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the U.S. Congress, Treasury, the FDIC, the SEC and others to address the current liquidity and credit crisis that has followed the sub-prime meltdown that commenced in 2007. These measures include homeowner relief that encourage loan restructuring and modification; the establishment of significant liquidity and credit facilities for financial institutions and investment banks; the lowering of the federal funds rate; emergency action against short selling practices; a temporary guaranty program for money market funds; the establishment of a commercial paper funding facility to provide back-stop liquidity to commercial paper issuers; and coordinated international efforts to address illiquidity and other weaknesses in the banking sector. The purpose of these legislative and regulatory actions is to stabilize the U.S. banking system. The EESA and the other regulatory initiatives described above may not have their desired effects. If the volatility in the markets continues and economic conditions fail to improve or worsen, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Current levels of market volatility are unprecedented.

The capital and credit markets have been experiencing volatility and disruption for more than a year. In recent months, the volatility and disruption has reached unprecedented levels. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial strength. If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that we will not experience an adverse effect, which may be material, on our ability to access capital and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our allowance for loan losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb probable losses in our loan portfolio.

Lending money is a substantial part of our business. Every loan carries a certain risk that it will not be repaid in accordance with its terms or that any underlying collateral will not be sufficient to assure repayment. This risk is affected by, among other things:

cash flow of the borrower and/or the project being financed;

in the case of a collateralized loan, the changes and uncertainties as to the future value of the collateral;

the credit history of a particular borrower;

changes in economic and industry conditions; and

the duration of the loan.

We maintain an allowance for loan losses which we believe is appropriate to provide for potential losses in our loan portfolio. The amount of this allowance is determined by our management through a periodic review and consideration of several factors, including, but not limited to:

an ongoing review of the quality, size and diversity of the loan portfolio;

evaluation of non-performing loans;

historical default and loss experience;

historical recovery experience;

existing economic conditions;

risk characteristics of the various classifications of loans; and

the amount and quality of collateral, including guarantees, securing the loans.

If our loan losses exceed our allowance for probable loan losses, our business, financial condition and profitability may suffer.

Our loan portfolio possesses increased risk due to our substantial number of multi-family, commercial real estate, consumer and commercial business loans.

Approximately 52.8% of our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2008, consists of multi-family, commercial real estate, consumer and commercial business loans. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans accounted for approximately 22.4% of our total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2008. Our commercial business and consumer loans accounted, respectively, for approximately 6.7% and 23.7% of our total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2008. Generally, we consider these types of loans to involve a higher degree of risk compared to first mortgage loans on one- to four-family, owner-occupied residential properties. For further information concerning the risks associated with multi-family, commercial real estate, consumer loans and commercial business loans, see “Lending Activities” and “Asset Quality” in Item 1.

Rising interest rates may hurt our profits.

To be profitable, we have to earn more money in interest we receive on loans and investments that we make than we pay to our depositors and lenders in interest. If interest rates rise, our net interest income and the value of our assets could be reduced if interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings, increases more quickly than interest received on interest-earning assets, such as loans, other mortgage-related investments and investment securities. This is most likely to occur if short-term interest rates increase at a faster rate than long-term interest rates, which would cause income to go down. In addition, rising interest rates may hurt our income, because they may reduce the demand for loans and the value of our securities. For a further discussion of how changes in interest rates could impact us, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 and “Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk” in Item 7A.

If economic conditions deteriorate, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely impacted as borrowers’ ability to repay loans declines and the value of the collateral securing our loans decreases.

Our financial results may be adversely affected by changes in prevailing economic conditions, including decreases in real estate values, changes in interest rates that cause a decrease in interest rate spreads, adverse employment conditions, the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government and other significant external events. In addition, we have a significant amount of real estate loans. Accordingly, decreases in real estate values could adversely affect the value of collateral securing our loans. Adverse changes in the economy may also have a negative effect on the ability of our borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans. In this regard, a substantial majority of our loans are to individuals and businesses in north and central eastern Indiana. These factors could expose us to an increased risk of loan defaults and losses and have an adverse impact on our earnings.

Liquidity risk could impair our ability to fund operations and jeopardize our financial condition.

Liquidity is essential to our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities or the terms of which are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry or economy in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn in the markets in which our loans are concentrated or adverse regulatory action against us. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a disruption in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry in light of the recent turmoil faced by banking organizations and the continued deterioration in credit markets.

We may elect or be compelled to seek additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed.

We are required by federal regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. In addition, we may elect to raise additional capital to support our business or to finance acquisitions, if any, or we may otherwise elect or be required to raise additional capital. In that regard, a number of financial institutions have recently raised considerable amounts of capital in response to a deterioration in their results of operations and financial condition arising from the turmoil in the mortgage loan market, deteriorating economic conditions, declines in real estate values and other factors. Should we be required by regulatory authorities to raise additional capital, we may seek to do so through the issuance of, among other things, our common stock or preferred stock.

Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, many of which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of our ability to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If we are unable to redeem our Series A Preferred Stock after five years, the cost of this capital to us will increase substantially.

If we are unable to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock prior to February 15, 2014, the cost of this capital to us will increase substantially on that date, from 5.0% per annum (approximately $1.6 million annually) to 9.0% per annum (approximately $2.9 million annually). See “Description of Capital Stock—Series A Preferred Stock-Redemption and Repurchases.” Depending on our financial condition at the time, this increase in the annual dividend rate on the Series A Preferred Stock could have a material negative effect on our liquidity.

We operate in a highly regulated environment, and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.

The Bank is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the OTS, its chartering authority, and by the FDIC, as insurer of its deposits. MutualFirst Financial also is subject to regulation and supervision by the OTS. This regulation and supervision governs the activities in which we may engage, and are intended primarily for the protection of the deposit insurance fund and depositors. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on our operations, the classification of our assets and determination of the level of our allowance for loan losses. Any change in this regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may have a material impact on our operations.

Strong competition within our market area may limit our growth and profitability.

Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. In our market area, we compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, and brokerage and investment banking firms operating locally and elsewhere. Many of these competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we do and may offer certain services that we do not or cannot provide. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete in our market.

We rely on dividends from the Bank for substantially all of our revenue.

MutualFirst receives substantially all of its revenue as dividends from the Bank. OTS regulations limit the amount of dividends that the Bank may pay to MutualFirst Financial. See “Regulatory Considerations.” In the event the Bank becomes unable to pay dividends to MutualFirst Financial, MutualFirst Financial may not be able to service its debt, pay its other obligations or pay dividends on its common stock. Accordingly, our inability to receive dividends from the Bank could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the value of your investment in our common stock. As of December 31, 2008, the Bank is required to receive regulatory approval prior to declaring dividends to the Company.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, and this may make it difficult for you to resell our common stock when you want or at prices you find attractive.

We cannot predict how our common stock will trade in the future. The market value of our common stock will likely continue to fluctuate in response to a number of factors including the following, most of which are beyond our control, as well as the other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section:

actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating and financial results;

developments related to investigations, proceedings or litigation that involve us;

changes in financial estimates and recommendations by financial analysts;

dispositions, acquisitions and financings;

fluctuations in the stock prices and operating results of our competitors;

regulatory developments; and

other developments related to the financial services industry.

The market value of our common stock may also be affected by conditions affecting the financial markets in general, including price and trading fluctuations. These conditions may result in (i) volatility in the level of, and fluctuations in, the market prices of stocks generally and, in turn, our common stock and (ii) sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the market, in each case that could be unrelated or disproportionate to changes in our operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market value of our common stock. Our common stock also has a low average daily trading volume relative to many other stocks, which may limit an investor’s ability to quickly accumulate or divest themselves of large blocks of our stock. This can lead to significant price swings even when a relatively small number of shares are being traded.

There may be future sales of additional common stock or preferred stock or other dilution of our equity, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We are not restricted from issuing additional common stock or preferred stock, including any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock or preferred stock or any substantially similar securities. The market value of our common stock could decline as a result of sales by us of a large number of shares of common stock or preferred stock or similar securities in the market or the perception that such sales could occur.

Anti-takeover provisions could negatively impact our shareholders.

Provisions in our charter and bylaws, the corporate law of the State of Maryland and federal regulations could delay, defer or prevent a third party from acquiring us, despite the possible benefit to our stockholders, or otherwise adversely affect the market price of any class of our equity securities, including our common stock. These provisions include: a prohibition on voting shares of common stock beneficially owned in excess of 10% of total shares outstanding, supermajority voting requirements for certain business combinations with any person who beneficially owns more than 10% of our outstanding common stock; the election of directors to staggered terms of three years; advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our Board of Directors and for proposing matters that stockholders may act on at stockholder meetings, a requirement that only directors may fill a vacancy in our Board of Directors, supermajority voting requirements to remove any of our directors and the other provisions of our charter.” Our charter also authorizes our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock , and preferred stock could be issued as a defensive measure in response to a takeover proposal. For further information, see “Description of Capital Stock—Preferred Stock.” In addition, pursuant to OTS regulations, as a general matter, no person or company, acting individually or in concert with others, may acquire more than 10% of our common stock without prior approval from the OTS.

These provisions may discourage potential takeover attempts, discourage bids for our common stock at a premium over market price or adversely affect the market price of, and the voting and other rights of the holders of, our common stock. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for holders of our common stock to elect directors other than the candidates nominated by our Board of Directors.

The voting limitation provision in our charter could limit your voting rights as a holder of our common stock.

Our charter provides that any person or group who acquires beneficial ownership of our common stock in excess of 10% of the outstanding shares may not vote the excess shares. Accordingly, if you acquire beneficial ownership of more than 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, your voting rights with respect to the common stock will not be commensurate with your economic interest in our company.

The securities purchase agreement between us and Treasury limits our ability to pay dividends on and repurchase our common stock.

The securities purchase agreement between us and Treasury provides that prior to the earlier of (i) December 23, 2011 and (ii) the date on which all of the shares of the Series A Preferred Stock have been redeemed by us or transferred by Treasury to third parties, we may not, without the consent of Treasury, (a) increase the cash dividend on our common stock or (b) subject to limited exceptions, redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire shares of our common stock or preferred stock (other than the Series A Preferred Stock) or any trust preferred securities then outstanding. In addition, we are unable to pay any dividends on our common stock unless we are current in our dividend payments on the Series A Preferred Stock. These restrictions, together with the potentially dilutive impact of the warrant described in the next risk factor, could have a negative effect on the value of our common stock. Moreover, holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends only when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors. Although we have historically paid cash dividends on our common stock, we are not required to do so and our Board of Directors could reduce or eliminate our common stock dividend in the future.

The Series A Preferred Stock impacts net income available to our common shareholders and earnings per common share, and the warrant we issued to Treasury may be dilutive to holders of our common stock.

The dividends declared on the Series A Preferred Stock will reduce the net income available to common shareholders and our earnings per common share. The Series A Preferred Stock will also receive preferential treatment in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of MutualFirst Financial. Additionally, the ownership interest of the existing holders of our common stock will be diluted to the extent the warrant we issued to Treasury in conjunction with the sale to Treasury of the Series A Preferred Stock is exercised. The shares of common stock underlying the warrant represent approximately 8.2% of the shares of our common stock outstanding (including the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrant in total shares outstanding). Although Treasury has agreed not to vote any of the shares of common stock it receives upon exercise of the warrant, a transferee of any portion of the warrant or of any shares of common stock acquired upon exercise of the warrant is not bound by this restriction

The amount of common stock we control, our articles of incorporation and bylaws, and state and federal statutory provisions could discourage hostile acquisitions of control.

Our board of directors and executive officers beneficially own 12.38% of our common stock, and have additional stock options for 413,390 shares which are exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2009. In addition, our employee stock ownership plan(s) and charitable foundation controlled, respectively, 6.4% and 3.2% of our common stock. As of December 31, 2008, 357,902 shares were reserved under various stock benefit plans for future awards for directors, officers and employees of the Company and the Bank. This inside ownership together with provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of discouraging attempts to acquire MutualFirst , pursue a proxy contest for control of MutualFirst , assume control of MutualFirst by a holder of a large block of common stock and remove MutualFirst ’s management, all of which certain stockholders might think are in their best interests. These provisions include, among other things: (a) staggered terms of the members of the board of directors; (b) an 80% shareholder vote requirement for approval of any merger or consolidation of MutualFirst into any entity that directly or indirectly owns 5% or more of MutualFirst voting stock if the transaction is not approved in advance by at least a majority of the disinterested members of MutualFirst’s board of directors; (c) supermajority shareholder vote requirements for the approval of certain amendments to MutualFirst’s articles of incorporation and bylaws; (d) a prohibition on any holder of common stock voting more than 10% of the outstanding common stock; (e) elimination of cumulative voting by stockholders in the election of directors; (f) restrictions on the acquisition of our equity securities; and (g) the authorization of 5 million shares of preferred stock that may be issued with stockholder approval on terms or in circumstances that could deter a future takeover attempt. As a Maryland corporation, we are subject to the Maryland business corporation law, which contains certain restrictions on an acquisition of control of MutualFirst . Furthermore, federal law requires regulatory approval of any acquisition of control of MutualFirst and imposes limits on the types of companies that can control us.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None

Item 2. Properties

At December 31, 2008 we had 33 full service offices. We own the office building in which our home office and executive offices are located. At December 31, 2008 we owned all but two of our other branch offices. The net book value of our investment in premises, equipment and leaseholds, excluding computer equipment, was approximately $34.2 million at December 31, 2008. We believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet our present and immediately foreseeable needs.

We utilize a third party service provider to maintain our database of depositor and borrower customer information. At December 31, 2008 the net book value of the data processing and computer equipment utilized by us was $2.3 million .

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. We do not anticipate incurring any material liability as a result of such litigation.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the quarter ended December 31, 2008.

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The common stock for MutualFirst Financial, Inc. is traded under the symbol “MFSF” on the Nasdaq Global Market. The table below shows the high and low closing prices for our common stock for the periods indicated. This information was provided by the Nasdaq. At December 31, 2008 there were 6,984,754 shares of common stock and at that date we also had 32,382 shares of preferred stock outstanding and approximately 1,400 shareholders of record.

	Stock Price				Dividends per Share
2008 Quarters:	High		Low
First Quarter (ended 03/31/08)	$	13.98	$	12.80	$	.16
Second Quarter (ended 06/30/08)	$	13.66	$	9.81	$	.16
Third Quarter (ended 09/30/08)	$	11.00	$	9.34	$	.16
Fourth Quarter (ended 12/31/08)	$	10.50	$	6.20	$	.16

	Stock Price				Dividends per Share
2007 Quarters:	High		Low
First Quarter (ended 03/31/07)	$	21.20	$	19.42	$	.15
Second Quarter (ended 06/30/07)	$	20.00	$	18.30	$	.15
Third Quarter (ended 09/30/07)	$	19.00	$	16.52	$	.15
Fourth Quarter (ended 12/31/07)	$	18.58	$	13.89	$	.15

Our cash dividend payout policy is continually reviewed by management and the Board of Directors. The Company intends to continue its policy of paying quarterly dividends; however, the payment will depend upon a number of factors, including capital requirements, regulatory limitations, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to the Company. The Company relies significantly upon such dividends originating from the Bank to accumulate earnings for payment of cash dividends to shareholders.

Information regarding our equity compensation plans is included in Item 12 of this Form 10-K.

On September 12, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase an additional 5% of the Company’s outstanding stock, or approximately 215,000 shares. This purchase plan was completed during the third quarter of 2008. On August 13, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase an additional 5% of the Company’s outstanding stock, or approximately 350,000 shares. Our ability to repurchase shares is limited under the securities purchase agreement with Treasury. See Item 1 A.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

The following information is only a summary and you should read it in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

	At or For the Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007		2006			2005		2004
	(In thousands)

Selected Financial Condition Data

Total assets	$	1,388,827		$	962,517	$	960,842		$	971,829	$	839,387
Cash and cash equivalents		39,703			23,648		24,915			22,365		19,743
Loans, net		1,113,132			802,436		805,625			822,547		713,022
Investment securities:
Available-for -sale, at fair value		77,255			43,592		41,070			39,788		39,409
Held to maturity		9,676			—		—			—		—
Total deposits		962,514			666,407		703,359			684,554		600,407
Total borrowings		279,104			196,638		158,852			187,791		141,572
Total stockholders’ equity		130,515			87,014		87,264			88,794		87,860

Selected Operations Data
Total interest income	$	65,179		$	56,374	$	56,119		$	48,478	$	44,400
Total interest expense		31,639			32,227		29,890			21,170		17,476
Net interest income		33,540			24,147		26,229			27,308		26,924
Provision for loan losses		7,020			2,240		2,068			1,775		1,557
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		26,520			21,907		24,161			25,533		25,367
Service fee income		6,257			4,831		4,370			4,026		3,193
Gain(loss) on sale of loans and investment securities		(2,277	)		391		(669	)		228		727
Other non-interest income (loss)		2,542			2,549		2,941			2,478		2,304
Total non-interest income		6,522			7,771		6,642			6,732		6,224
Salaries and employee benefits		19,118			14,759		14,617			13,792		16,167
Other expenses		44,508			10,397		10,402			9,620		8,149
Total non-interest expense		63,626			25,156		25,019			23,412		24,316
Income (loss) before taxes		(30,583	)		4,522		5,784			8,853		7,275
Income tax expense (benefit)		(8,485	)		296		1,028			2,401		1,753
Net income (loss)	$	(22,098	)	$	4,226	$	4,756		$	6,452	$	5,522

	At or For the Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007			2006			2005			2004
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Financial Data:

Performance Ratios:

Return on average assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)		(1.91	)%		0.44	%		0.49	%		0.73	%		0.67	%
Return on average tangible equity (ratio of net income to average tangible equity)		(28.04	)		5.86			6.43			7.79			5.90
Interest rate spread information:
Average during the period		3.01			2.50			2.70			3.13			3.46
Net interest margin (1)		3.22			2.79			2.96			3.37			3.57
Ratio of operating expense to average total assets		5.49			2.64			2.57			2.89			2.94
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest- bearing liabilities		107.14			107.92			107.65			109.30			106.06
Efficiency ratio (2)		158.81			78.81			76.11			68.78			73.26

Asset Quality Ratios: (3)
Non-performing assets to total assets		1.92			1.35			0.86			1.03			0.65
Non-performing loans to total loans		1.93			1.29			0.70			0.90			0.57
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans		69.41			79.72			143.59			108.04			167.32
Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, net		1.34			1.03			1.00			0.98			0.95

Capital Ratios:
Equity to total assets (3)		9.40			9.04			9.08			9.14			10.47
Average equity to average assets		8.89			9.16			9.08			9.90			11.50

Share and Per Share Data:
Average common shares outstanding:
Basic		5,249,135			4,103,940			4,196,059			4,328,965			4,625,437
Diluted		5,253,477			4,151,173			4,274,039			4,439,686			4,772,036
Per share:
Basic earnings	$	(4.22	)	$	1.03		$	1.13		$	1.49		$	1.19
Diluted earnings	$	(4.22	)	$	1.02		$	1.11		$	1.45		$	1.16
Dividends	$	0.64		$	0.60		$	0.58		$	0.49		$	0.47

Dividend payout ratio (4)		(15.20	)%		58.25	%		52.25	%		36.55	%		40.52	%

Other Data:
Number of full-service offices		33			21			21			20			18

(1)	Net interest income divided by average interest earning assets.

(2)	Total non-interest expense divided by net interest income plus total non-interest income.

(3)	At the end of the period.

(4)	Dividends per share divided by diluted earnings per share.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Introduction

MutualFirst Financial, Inc., a Maryland corporation, is a savings and loan holding company and its wholly-owned subsidiary is MutualBank, Muncie, Indiana. MFS Financial, Inc. was formed in September 1999 to become the holding company of MutualBank in connection with MutualBank’s conversion from the mutual to stock form of organization on December 29, 1999. In April 2000, MFS Financial, Inc. formally changed its corporate name to MutualFirst Financial, Inc. (“ MutualFirst”) . The words “we,” “our” and “us” refer to MutualFirst and MutualBank on a consolidated basis, except that references to us prior to December 29, 1999 refer only to MutualBank.

Our principal business consists of attracting retail deposits from the general public and investing those funds primarily in permanent loans secured by first mortgages on owner-occupied, one-to four-family residences, a variety of consumer loans, loans secured by commercial and multi-family real estate and commercial business loans. We are headquartered in Muncie, Indiana with 33 retail offices primarily serving Delaware, Elkhart, Grant, Kosciusko, Randolph, St. Joseph and Wabash counties. MutualBank also has trust offices in Carmel and Crawfordsville, Indiana and a loan origination office in New Buffalo, Michigan. We also originate mortgage loans in counties contiguous to these counties, and we originate indirect consumer loans throughout Indiana.

In August 2006, MutualBank purchased three branch offices in Winchester, Wabash and Warsaw, Indiana, resulting in the acquisition of $8.7 million in assets and the assumption of $12.4 million in liabilities for $1.0 million in cash. The assets purchased included residential real estate mortgage loans of $5.4 million, and consumer loans of $1.2 million. The liabilities assumed included total deposits of $12.3 million.

On March 22, 2007 the Bank completed the acquisition of Wagley Investment Advisors, Inc. Wagley Investment Advisors, Inc. is now known as Mutual Financial Advisors, providing new and expanded investment management services not previously offered by the Bank. Mutual Financial Advisors offers a full range of non-bank investment options and money management.

On July 18, 2008, the Company acquired MFB Corp. ("MFB") and merged MFB’s subsidiary bank, MFB Financial into MutualBank. MutualFirst issued an aggregate of 2.9 million shares of its common stock and paid approximately $11.5 million in cash to MFB stockholders in the transaction. MutualFirst also assumed 114,500 MFB stock options, which have converted into approximately 296,555 MutualFirst stock options with a weighted average exercise price of $9.90 per share. As a result of the transaction, MutualBank now has 33 retail financial centers, spanning nine Indiana counties and is the 11 th largest depository institution headquartered in Indiana. MutualBank also has a trust office in Carmel and Crawfordsville, Indiana and a loan origination office in New Buffalo, Michigan.

The Company placed $29.1 million of TARP proceeds into its wholly-owned subsidiary MutualBank, while maintaining the $3.2 million with the Company. MutualBank placed approximately $20.0 million of the proceeds in highly rated securities. Approximately $14.8 million was placed in mortgage securities, $3.2 million in municipal securities and $2.0 million in corporate bonds. These securities will provide liquidity as needed to meet current and future loan demand. The remaining funds held at MutualBank were placed in working capital, which was used to fund loans and meet the cash needs of MutualBank.

The following discussion is intended to assist your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Our results of operations depend primarily on the level of our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, primarily deposits and borrowings. The structure of our interest-earning assets versus the structure of interest-bearing liabilities along with the shape of the yield curve has a direct impact on our net interest income. Historically, our interest-earning assets have been longer term in nature (i.e., fixed-rate mortgage loans) and interest-bearing liabilities have been shorter term (i.e., certificates of deposit, regular savings accounts, etc.). This structure would impact net interest income favorably in a decreasing rate environment, assuming a normally shaped yield curve, as the rates on interest-bearing liabilities would decrease more rapidly than rates on the interest-earning assets. Conversely, in an increasing rate environment, assuming a normally shaped yield curve, net interest income would be impacted unfavorably as rates on interest-earning assets would increase at a slower rate than rates on interest-bearing liabilities.

The acquisition of MFB in July 2008 and the sale of $92.9 million of fixed rate mortgages in 2008 helped change the structure of MutualBank’s balance sheet. Net interest income should be less vulnerable to changes in interest rates. The Federal Funds rate set by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has decreased to a range of 0 to 25 basis points as of December 31, 2008. The Federal Funds rate at this level decreases the ability to reprice deposits lower in future months. Certificates of deposit and borrowings may, however, still reprice to lower rates at their maturities in future time periods, which could reduce the amount of interest expense. Interest income is expected to decrease without any changes in the current rate environment primarily due to the rates on newly originated interest-earning assets are lower than the rates on maturing interest-earning assets. Another factor that may lead to changes in net interest income is the level of non-performing assets. An increase in non-performing assets (i.e., loans, repossessed assets, or securities) would also decrease interest income and may decrease overall net interest income without additional decreases in interest-bearing liabilities.

Results of operations are also dependent upon the level of the Company’s non-interest income, including fee income and service charges, and the level of its non-interest expense, including general and administrative expenses. MutualWealth, the wealth management division of the Bank, produces non-interest income for the Bank that is tied primarily to the market value of the portfolios being managed. As of December 31, 2008, MutualWealth had $352.0 million of assets under management. Decreases in market value could have a negative impact on the non-interest income generated by this division of the Bank.

Difficult market conditions and economic trends have adversely affected our industry and our business.

Dramatic declines in the housing market, with decreasing home prices and increasing delinquencies and foreclosures, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage and construction loans and resulted in significant write-downs of assets by many financial institutions. General downward economic trends, reduced availability of commercial credit and increasing unemployment have negatively impacted the credit performance of commercial and consumer credit, resulting in additional write-downs. Concerns over the stability of the financial markets and the economy have resulted in decreased lending by financial institutions to their customers and to each other. This market turmoil and tightening of credit has led to increased commercial and consumer deficiencies, lack of customer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction in general business activity. Financial institutions have experienced decreased access to deposits or borrowings.

Recent legislative and regulatory initiatives to address these difficult market and economic conditions may not stabilize the US banking system.

Management Strategy

Our strategy is to operate as an independent, retail-oriented financial institution dedicated to serving customers in our market areas. Our commitment is to provide a broad range of products and services to meet the needs of our customers. As part of this commitment, we are looking to increase our emphasis on commercial business products and services. We also operate a fully interactive transactional website. In addition, we are continually looking at cost-effective ways to expand our market area.

Financial highlights of our strategy have included:

Continuing as a Diversified Lender. We have been successful in diversifying our loan portfolio to reduce our reliance on any one type of loan. From 1995 through 2000, approximately 36% of our loan portfolio consisted of loans other than one-to four- family real estate loans. Since that time to the end of 2008, that percentage has increased to 53%.

Continuing as a Leading One- to Four-Family Lender. We are one of the largest originators of one- to four-family residential loans in our five-county market area. During 2008, we originated $111.1 million of one- to four-family residential loans.

Continuing To Focus On Asset Quality. Non-performing assets to total assets was 1.92% at December 31, 2008, up from 1.35% at December 31, 2007. We believe that our underwriting standards will provide for a quality loan portfolio.

Continuing Our Strong Capital Position. As a result of our consistent operating profitability, we have historically maintained a strong capital position. At December 31, 2008, our ratio of stockholders’ equity to total assets was 9.4%.

Since 2000 it has been MutualFirst ’s strategic objective to change the repricing structure of its interest-earning assets from longer term to shorter term to better match the structure of our interest bearing liabilities and therefore reduce the impact interest rate changes have on our net interest income. Strategies employed to accomplish this objective have been to increase the originations of variable rate commercial loans and shorter term consumer loans and to sell longer term mortgage loans.

During 2008, in keeping with its strategic objective to reduce interest rate risk exposure, MutualFirst also sold $92.9 million of long term fixed-rate loans that had been held for sale, which reduced potential earning assets and therefore had a negative impact on net interest income. This was offset, in the short term, by recognizing a gain on the sale of these loans of $1.4 million during the year.

Financial Condition at December 31, 2008 Compared to December 31, 2007

General. Our assets increased $426.3 million during 2008, ending the year at $1.4 billion compared to $962.5 million at December 31, 2007. Liabilities increased $382.8 million or 43.7% during 2008 to $1.3 billion at December 31, 2008. Stockholders’ equity increased $43.5 million to $130.5 million at December 31, 2008. These increases were primarily due to the acquisition of MFB and are discussed in further detail below.

Loans . Our net loan portfolio increased $310.7 million from $802.4 million at December 31, 2007, to $1.1 billion at December 31, 2008, primarily due to the acquisition of MFB. Consumer loans increased $42.9 million or 19.0% from $225.5 million at December 31, 2007 to $268.4 million at December 31, 2008. Most of the consumer loan growth came from home equity loans acquired from MFB, which increased $39.2 million or 144.1% from $27.2 million to $66.5 million. Recreational vehicles increased $2.1 million to $79.9 million and other consumer loans increased $3.0 million to $5.8 million at December 31, 2008. The remainder of the consumer portfolio decreased slightly. Commercial business loans increased $18.5 million or 32.6% from $56.8 million to $75.3 million at December 31, 2008. It has been our strategy to increase non-real estate mortgage loans as a percentage of our loan portfolio in order to mitigate interest rate risk and enhance the portfolio yield. Accordingly, we sold $92.9 million of our fixed rate one- to four-family mortgage loans in 2008. Despite this, real estate mortgage loans increased $256.5 million or 48.5% from $529.0 million to $785.4 million at December 31, 2008 primarily due to the acquisition of MFB. Mortgage loans held for sale decreased $104,000 to $1.5 million at December 31, 2008.

Allowance For Loan Loss. Allowance for loan losses increased $6.8 million, including $3.0 million acquired with MFB, to $15.1 million at December 31, 2008 when compared to December 31, 2007. Specific loan loss reserves have increased $658,000, while general loan loss reserves have increased $6.1 million since December 31, 2007. Net charge offs for the year 2008 were $3.2 million, or .34% of average loans on an annualized basis, compared to $2.0 million, or .25% of average loans for the comparable period in 2007. The increase was primarily due to increased charge offs on commercial real estate loans during 2008. As of December 31, 2008, the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans receivable and non-performing loans was 1.34% and 69.41%, respectively, compared to 1.03% and 79.72%, respectively, at December 31, 2007.

Securities. Investment securities available for sale increased $33.7 million, or 77.1%, compared to December 31, 2007 due primarily to $23.9 million acquired with MFB. Investment securities held to maturity increased $9.7 million due to securities received in the third quarter of 2008 through a redemption in kind as a result of a liquidation of a mutual fund.

Liabilities. Our total liabilities increased $382.8 million or 43.7% to $1.3 billion at December 31, 2008 from $875.5 million at December 31, 2007. Deposits increased $296.1 million, and borrowed funds increased $82.5 million as a result of the acquisition of MFB.

Stockholders’ Equity . Stockholders’ equity increased $43.5 million, or 50.0%, from $87.0 million at December 31, 2007, to $130.5 million at December 31, 2008. The increase was due primarily to stock issued to acquire MFB of $39.8 million, preferred stock issued to the United States Treasury Department of $32.4 million, and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) and RRP shares earned of $364,000. This increase was partially offset by a net loss of $22.1 million, the repurchase of 154,000 shares of common stock for $1.8 million and dividend payments of $3.5 million. Also, the market value of securities available for sale compared to their book value decreased $1.5 million from a loss of $414,000 at December 31, 2007 to a loss of $1.9 million at December 31, 2008. An increase on a postretirement benefit obligation decreased equity $110,000. As of December 31, 2008, the Bank’s capital ratio was 13.79%, well in excess of “well-capitalized” levels as defined by all regulatory standards. The Company’s tangible equity to tangible asset ratio was 6.79%.

Financial Condition at December 31, 2007 Compared to December 31, 2006

General. Our assets increased $1.7 million during 2007, ending the year at $962.5 million compared to $960.8 million at December 31, 2006. Liabilities increased $1.9 million or 0.22% during 2007 to $875.5 million at December 31, 2007. Stockholders’ equity decreased $250,000 to $87.0 million at December 31, 2007 as a result of stock repurchases and cash dividends of $5.2 million which were partially offset by net income, employee benefits earned and stock options exercised of $5.0 million.

Loans . Our net loan portfolio decreased $3.2 million from $805.6 million at December 31, 2006, to $802.4 million at December 31, 2007, primarily due to slower loan production in 2007. Consumer loans increased $2.5 million or 1.1% from $223.0 million at December 31, 2006 to $225.5 million at December 31, 2007. Most of the consumer loan growth came from recreational vehicle and boat loans, which increased $8.0 million or 6.8% from $117.6 million to $125.6 million and home equity and home improvements loans, which increased $3.8 million or 5.5% from $68.6 million to $72.4 million. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $8.4 million or 26.9% in automobile loans. Commercial business loans decreased $10.7 million or 15.9% from $67.5 million to $56.8 million at December 31, 2007. It has been our strategy to increase non-real estate mortgage loans as a percentage of our loan portfolio in order to mitigate interest rate risk and enhance the portfolio yield. Accordingly, we sold $24.1 million of our fixed rate one- to four-family mortgage loans in 2007. Real estate mortgage loans increased $3.7 million or 0.7% from $525.2 million to $529.0 million at December 31, 2007 primarily due to increases in commercial real estate loans of $8.2 million or 11.1%. Mortgage loans held for sale increased $315,000 to $1.6 million at December 31, 2007.

Allowance For Loan Loss. The allowance for loan losses increased $197,000 to $8.4 million at December 31, 2007. This increase included additional reserves of $2.2 million for 2007. Net charge-offs for the year were $2.0 million or 0.25% of average loans compared to $2.0 million or 0.24% of average loans in 2006. The increase in the allowance for loan losses was due to continued poor economic conditions in some of our markets and changes in the mix of loans in the portfolio. As of December 31, 2007, our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans receivable and non-performing loans was 1.03% and 79.72%, respectively.

Securities. Investment securities totaled $43.6 million at December 31, 2007 compared to $41.1 million at December 31, 2006, a 6.1% increase.

Liabilities. Our total liabilities increased $1.9 million or 0.22% to $875.5 million at December 31, 2007 from $873.6 million at December 31, 2006. Deposits decreased $37.0 million, and borrowed funds increased $37.8 million as a result of better market prices on borrowings when compared to certificate of deposits toward the end of 2007.

Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ equity decreased $254,000 from $87.3 million at December 31, 2006 to $87.0 million at December 31, 2007. This decrease in stockholders’ equity was the result of the repurchase of 155,400 shares of our common stock for $2.8 million and cash dividend payments of $2.4 million, which were partially offset by $4.2 million in net income, earned Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares of $583,000, earned tax-affected restricted stock shares of $3,000 and exercised stock options of $209,000. Also, the market value of securities available for sale compared to their book value decreased $60,000 from a loss of $355,000 at December 31, 2006 to a loss of $414,000 at December 31, 2007.

Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid

The following table presents for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates. No tax equivalent adjustments were made. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.

Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid

	Year ended December 31,
	2008								2007								2006
	Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate


	(Dollars in thousands)

Interest-Earning Assets:
Interest -bearing deposits	$	8,711		$	118		1.35	%	$	2,982		$	115		3.86	%	$	1,918		$	67		3.49	%
Mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale (1)		28,648			1,596		5.57	%		8,875			467		5.26	%		10,532			481		4.57	%
Investment securities available-for-sale (1)		28,987			1,303		4.50	%		31,234			1,644		5.26	%		30,055			1,440		4.79	%
Investment securities held-to-maturity		3,360			314		9.35	%
Loans (2)		956,788			61,128		6.39	%		811,991			53,686		6.61	%		834,321			56,673		6.43	%
Stock in FHLB of Indianapolis		14,010			720		5.14	%		9,939			462		4.65	%		10,128			459		4.53	%
Total interest-earning assets		1,040,504			65,179		6.26	%		865,021			56,374		6.52	%		886,954			56,120		6.33	%
Non-Interest Earning Assets (net of allowance for loan losses and unrealized gain/loss)		118,673								87,879								85,641
Total assets	$	1,159,177							$	952,900							$	972,595

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Demand and NOW accounts	$	148,703			1,564		1.05	%	$	126,034			2,841		2.25	%	$	101,627			1,662		1.64	%
Savings deposits		66,315			317		0.48	%		54,975			281		0.51	%		60,253			301		0.50	%
Money market accounts		34,000			615		1.81	%		24,588			621		2.53	%		34,920			690		1.98	%
Certificate accounts		492,405			18,920		3.84	%		444,271			20,755		4.67	%		461,678			19,372		4.20	%
Total deposits		741,423			21,416		2.89	%		649,868			24,498		3.77	%		658,478			22,025		3.34	%
Borrowings		229,768			10,223		4.45	%		151,636			7,729		5.10	%		165,465			7,866		4.75	%
Total interest-bearing accounts		971,191			31,639		3.26	%		801,504			32,227		4.02	%		823,943			29,891		3.63	%
Non-Interest Bearing Accounts		66,746								48,589								45,597
Other Liabilities		18,138								15,478								14,759
Total Liabilities		1,056,075								865,571								884,299
Stockholders’ Equity		103,102								87,329								88,296
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,159,177							$	952,900							$	972,595

Net Earning Assets	$	69,313							$	63,517							$	63,011

Net Interest Income				$	33,540							$	24,147							$	26,229

Net Interest Rate Spread (3)							3.01	%							2.50	%							2.70	%

Net Yield on Average Interest-Earning Assets (4)							3.22	%							2.79	%							2.96	%

Average Interest-Earning Assets to Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities		107.14	%							107.92	%							107.65	%

(1)	Average balances were calculated using amortized cost, which excludes FASB 115 valuation allowances.

(2)	Calculated net of deferred loan fees, loan discounts and loans in process.

(3)	Interest rate spread is calculated by subtracting weighted average interest rate cost from weighted average interest rate yield for the period indicated.

(4)	The net yield on weighted average interest-earning assets is calculated by dividing net interest income by weighted average interest-earning assets for the period indicated.

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes in volume, which are changes in volume multiplied by the old rate, and (2) changes in rate, which is a change in rate multiplied by the old volume. Changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008 vs. 2007								2007 vs. 2006
	Increase (decrease) Due to					Total Increase (decrease)			Increase (decrease) Due to					Total Increase (decrease)
	Volume		Rate			Total Increase (decrease)			Volume			Rate		Total Increase (decrease)
	(Dollars in thousands)

Interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	114	$	(111	)	$	3		$	40		$	8	$	48
Investment securities available-for-sale		1,259		(157	)		1,102			(24	)		214		190
Loans receivable		9,302		(1,860	)		7,442			(1,456	)		1,469		13
Stock in FHLB of Indianapolis		205		53			258			(9	)		12		3

Total interest-earning assets	$	10,880	$	(2,075	)	$	8,805		$	(1,449	)	$	1,703	$	254

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings deposits	$	55	$	(19	)	$	36		$	(27	)	$	7	$	(20	)
Money market accounts		199		(205	)		(6	)		(233	)		164		(69	)
Demand and NOW accounts		442		(1,719	)		(1,277	)		458			721		1,179
Certificate accounts		2,097		(3,932	)		(1,835	)		(751	)		2,134		1,383
Borrowings		3,576		(1,082	)		2,494			(683	)		546		(137	)

Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	6,369	$	(6,957	)	$	(588	)	$	(1,236	)	$	3,572	$	2,336

Change in net interest income						$	9,393							$	(2,082	)

Comparison of Results of Operations for Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

General. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $22.1 million, or $4.22 for basic and diluted loss per common share. This compared to net income in 2007 of $4.2 million, or $1.03 for basic and $1.02 for diluted earnings per common share. Annualized return on average assets was negative 7.13% and return on average tangible equity was negative 108.92% for year end 2008 compared to .44% and 5.86%, respectively, for 2007.

Net Interest Income . Net interest income before the provision for loan losses increased $9.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. Average interest earning assets increased $175.5 million, or 20.3% and the net interest margin increased by 43 basis points from 2.79% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 3.22% for 2008 primarily due to the acquisition of MFB and the declining rate environment.

Interest Income. Interest income increased $8.8 million to $65.2 million at December 31, 2008, compared to $56.4 million at December 31, 2007. The increase in interest income during the year ended December 31, 2008 was due to an increase in average earning assets of $175.5 million due to the acquisition of MFB. This increase was partially offset by a 26 basis point decrease in the average yield on our earning assets from 6.52% in 2007 to 6.26% in 2008 as a result of decreasing market interest rates.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $588,000, or 1.8% to $31.6 million at December 31, 2008, from $32.2 million at December 31, 2007. The decrease in interest expense was due to a decrease in interest rates which lead to a decline of 76 basis points on interest-bearing liabilities from 4.02% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 3.26% for the year ended December 31, 2008. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in average interest-bearing liabilities of $169.7 million as a result of the acquisition of MFB. Interest expense on deposits decreased $3.1 million due to an 88 basis point decline in average rates paid. This decrease was partially offset by increases in average interest-bearing deposits of $91.6 million. Interest expense on borrowings increased $2.5 million due to an increase of average borrowings of $78.1 million, partially offset by a 65 basis point decrease in average rate.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $7.0 million, compared to $2.2 million for 2007. Non-performing loans to total loans at December 31, 2008 were 1.93% compared to 1.29% at December 31, 2007. Non-performing assets to total assets were 1.92% at December 31, 2008 compared to 1.35% at December 31, 2007. The increase in provision was due primarily to deteriorated asset quality, a weakened economy and an increased loan portfolio due to the acquisition of MFB.

Other Income. Non-interest income decreased $1.2 million, or 16.1%, to $6.5 million in 2008, compared to $7.8 million for 2007. The reasons for the decrease were due primarily to a loss related to the sale of the AMF Ultra Funds of $2.6 million, a $1.2 million write down on two trust preferred securities, a $200,000 write-down on a Lehman’s corporate bond, a $329,000 loss on the sale of a title insurance subsidiary, and a $500,000 impairment charge on mortgage servicing rights. These decreases were offset by increases in fees and service charges on deposit accounts of $1.4 million and commission income of $795,000 due primarily to the acquisition of MFB in the third quarter of 2008, and increases in gains on sale of loans of $1.0 million primarily due to the sale of $92.9 million of fixed rate mortgage loans in 2008.

Other Expense. Non-interest expense increased $38.5 million to $63.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $25.2 million for 2007. The increase was due primarily to a goodwill impairment charge of $29.0 million. Management engaged a third party business valuation specialist to perform the annual impairment test of goodwill. The step one impairment test indicated the fair value of the reporting unit was below the carrying value as of December 31, 2008. The step two impairment test was performed by allocating the fair value of the Company to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit to determine the implied fair value of the Company. Management determined the carrying amount of goodwill exceeded, in its entirety, the implied fair value of goodwill. Other expenses also increased due to increases in salaries and employee benefits of $4.4 million, increases in occupancy, equipment, data processing and ATM expense of $1.1 million, increases in marketing expense of $574,000, increases in professional fees of $369,000, increases in software subscriptions and maintenance of $494,000, increases in amortization of intangibles of $559,000 and increases in other expenses, such as supplies, postage and repossessed asset expense of $2.1 million. These increases were primarily due to the acquisition of MFB Corp. and rebranding of the Bank in 2008.

Income Tax Expense . Income tax expense decreased $8.8 million in 2008 compared to the year ended 2007. The decrease was due primarily to decreased taxable income. The effective tax rate also decreased due to a higher percentage of non-taxable income to total income before income tax and an increased percentage of low income housing tax credits to taxable income when comparing the year ended 2008 to the year ended 2007.

Comparison of Results of Operations for Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

General. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2007 decreased $530,000 or 11.2% to $4.2 million compared to $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Diluted earnings per share decreased 8.1% from $1.11 in 2006 to $1.02 in 2007. These decreases were primarily due to a lower net interest margin.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income before the provision for loan losses decreased $2.1 million to $24.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $26.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The reasons for the decrease were a decrease in average interest earning assets of $21.9 million, or 2.5% and a decrease in the net interest margin of 17 basis points from 2.96% for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 2.79% for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Interest Income. Interest income increased $254,000 to $56.4 million at December 31, 2007, compared to $56.1 million at December 31, 2006. The increase in interest income during the year ended December 31, 2007 was due to an increase in the average yield on our earning assets from 6.33% in 2006 to 6.52% in 2007 as a result of increasing market interest rates. This increase was partially offset by a $21.9 million decrease in average earning assets from $887.0 million during 2006 to $865.0 million during 2007. The majority of this decrease was in average loans receivable, which decreased $22.3 million from $834.3 in 2006 to $812.0 million in 2007 primarily due to a large loan sale toward the end of 2006 and lower loan originations in 2007. The average yield on these loans increased 18 basis points from 6.43% in 2006 to 6.61% in 2007.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $2.3 million, or 7.8% to $32.2 million at December 31, 2007, from $29.9 million at December 31, 2006. The increase in interest expense was due to an increase in interest rates and partially offset by a decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities during the year. There was a 39 basis point increase in the cost of our average interest-bearing liabilities from 3.63% in 2006 to 4.02% in 2007 as a result of higher market interest rates, which is partially offset by a decrease of $22.4 million in average interest-bearing liabilities from $823.9 million in 2006 to $801.5 million in 2007. The majority of this decrease was in average deposits, which decreased $8.6 million from $658.5 million in 2006 to $649.9 million in 2007 and in average borrowings, which decreased $13.8 million from $165.5 million in 2006 to $151.6 million in 2007. The average cost on these deposits increased 43 basis points from 3.34% in 2006 to 3.77% in 2007 and the average cost on these borrowings increased 35 basis points from 4.75% in 2006 to 5.10% in 2007. The average cost of funds comparing the third quarter of 2007 and the fourth quarter of 2007 decreased 7 basis points as interest rates began to fall.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses for 2007 was $2.2 million, compared to $2.1 million for 2006 due primarily to increased non-performing loans. Non-performing loans to total loans at December 31, 2007 were 1.29% compared to 0.70% at December 31, 2006. Non-performing assets to total assets were 1.35% at December 31, 2007 compared to .86% at December 31, 2006. These increases were primarily due to a weakening in the economy, which has resulted in increased delinquency at year ended December 31, 2007 compared to year ended December 31, 2006. It is management’s opinion that the non-performing loans are sufficiently reserved as of December 31, 2007 and any additional allowances will be insignificant .

Other Income. For the year ended December 31, 2007, non-interest income increased $1.1 million, or 17.0%, to $7.8 million, compared to $6.6 million the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was due primarily to increases in our service fees on transaction accounts of $461,000, or 10.5%, due primarily to adding additional fee based services, increases in commission income of $319,000, or 46.8%, due primarily to the acquisition of Wagley Investment Advisors and improved earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance of $155,000, or 14.4%. An increase in gain on sale of loans of $1.1 million and a decrease in other income of $966,000 were due primarily to non-recurring events in the fourth quarter of 2006, which included a loss on loans sold of $963,000 due to a large loan sale, a gain from a land exchange transaction and state tax refunds from previous years.

Other Expense. Non-interest expense increased $137,000, or 0.6% to $25.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $25.0 million for the year ended 2006. The increase was due primarily to increases in salaries and benefits of $142,000 and increases in occupancy and equipment of $163,000, due primarily to preparations for a new branch opening in February of 2008, and data processing expense of $160,000 due primarily to technological upgrades. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in professional fees of $229,000, a decrease in marketing expense of $79,000, and a decrease in other expenses of $20,000.

Income Tax Expense . Income tax expense decreased $732,000 compared to the year ended 2006. The decrease was due primarily to decreased taxable income. The effective tax rate also decreased from 17.8% to 6.5% due to a higher percentage of non-taxable income to total income before income tax and an increased percentage of low income housing tax credits to taxable income when comparing the year ended 2007 to the year ended 2006, respectively.

Liquidity and Commitments

MutualBank is required to maintain adequate levels of investments for liquidity purposes to ensure the institution’s safe and sound operations. Liquidity may increase or decrease depending upon the availability of funds and comparative yields on investments in relation to the return on loans. Historically, we have maintained liquid assets at levels adequate to meet the requirements of normal operations, including potential deposit outflows. Cash flow projections are regularly reviewed and updated to ensure that adequate liquidity is maintained. At December 31, 2008, our liquidity ratio, which is our liquid assets as a percentage of net withdrawable savings deposits and current borrowings, was 8.39%.

Our liquidity, represented by cash and cash equivalents and investment securities, is a product of our operating, investing and financing activities. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, amortization, prepayments and maturities of outstanding loans and mortgage-backed securities, maturities of investment securities and other short-term investments and funds provided from operations. While scheduled payments from the amortization of loans and mortgage-backed securities and maturing investment securities and short-term investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. In addition, we invest excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets, which provide liquidity to meet lending requirements. We also generate cash through borrowings. We utilize Federal Home Loan Bank advances to leverage our capital base and provide funds for our lending and investment activities, and to enhance our interest rate risk management.

Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. Excess liquidity is generally invested in short-term investments such as overnight deposits or U.S. Agency securities. We use our sources of funds primarily to meet our ongoing commitments, to pay maturing certificates of deposit and savings withdrawals, to fund loan commitments and to maintain our portfolio of mortgage-backed securities and investment securities. At December 31, 2008, the total approved loan origination commitments outstanding amounted to $18.3 million. At the same date, the unadvanced portion of construction loans was $4.2 million. At December 31, 2008, unused lines of credit totaled $134.1 million and outstanding letters of credit totaled $8.3 million. As of December 31, 2008, certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in one year or less totaled $356.9 million, and investment and mortgage-backed securities scheduled to mature in one year or less totaled $3.4 million. Based on historical experience, management believes that a significant portion of maturing deposits will remain with us. We anticipate that we will continue to have sufficient funds, through deposits and borrowings, to meet our current commitments.

The Company utilizes dividends from the bank as a source of funds to service debt and meet obligations of the Company. The dividends from the bank, require regulatory approval

The following table presents our contractual obligations (excluding deposit products).

	Payments due by period
			Less than			1-3		3-5	More than
	Total		1 year		years		Years		5 years
			(In thousands)
Contractual Obligations

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances	$	263,113	$	102,152	$	153,716	$	5,535	$	1,710
Notes Payable		647		421		226		—		—
Other Borrowings		15,345		500		6,000		5,000		3,845

Total	$	279,105	$	103,073	$	159,942	$	10,535	$	5,555

Capital

Consistent with our goals to operate a sound and profitable financial organization, MutualBank actively strives to remain a “well-capitalized” institution in accordance with regulatory standards. Total stockholders’ equity of MutualFirst Financial, Inc. was $130.5 million at December 31, 2008, or 9.39% of total assets on that date. As of December 31, 2008, MutualBank exceeded all capital requirements of the OTS, with regulatory capital ratios as follows: core capital, 9.9%; Tier I risk-based capital, 12.5%; and total risk-based capital, 13.8%. The regulatory capital requirements to be considered well capitalized are 5.0%, 6.0% and 10.0%, respectively.

Critical Accounting Policies

The notes to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K contain a summary of MutualFirst ’s significant accounting policies. Certain of these policies are important to the portrayal of MutualFirst ’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of foreclosed assets, mortgage servicing rights and real estate held for development and the valuation of intangible assets.

The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the economic environment and market conditions. A worsening or protracted economic decline would increase the likelihood of additional losses due to credit and market risk and could create the need for additional loss reserves.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a significant estimate that can and does change based on management’s assumptions about specific borrowers and current general economic and business conditions, among other factors. Management reviews the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on at least a quarterly basis. The evaluation by management includes consideration of past loss experience, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, the current condition and amount of loans outstanding, identified problem loans and the probability of collecting all amounts due.

Foreclosed Assets. Foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Management estimates the fair value of the properties based on current appraisal information. Fair value estimates are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the economic environment, market conditions, and real estate market. A worsening or protracted economic decline would increase the likelihood of a decline in property values and could create the need to write down the properties through current operations.

Mortgage Servicing Rights. Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) associated with loans originated and sold, where servicing is retained, are capitalized and included in other intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The value of the capitalized servicing rights represents the present value of the future servicing fees arising from the right to service loans in the portfolio. Critical accounting policies for MSRs relate to the initial valuation and subsequent impairment tests. The methodology used to determine the valuation of MSRs requires the development and use of a number of estimates, including anticipated principal amortization and prepayments of that principal balance. Events that may significantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. The carrying value of the MSRs is periodically reviewed for impairment based on a determination of fair value. For purposes of measuring impairment, the servicing rights are compared to a valuation prepared based on a discounted cash flow methodology, utilizing current prepayment speeds and discount rates. Impairment, if any, is recognized through a valuation allowance and is recorded as amortization of intangible assets .

Goodwill and Intangible Assets. MutualFirst periodically assesses the impairment of its goodwill and the recoverability of its core deposit intangible. Impairment is the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. If actual external conditions and future operating results differ from MutualFirst’s judgments, impairment and/or increased amortization charges may be necessary to reduce the carrying value of these assets to the appropriate value.

Valuation Measurements. Valuation methodologies often involve a significant degree of judgment, particularly when there are no observable active markets for the items being valued. Investment securities and derivatives are carried at fair value, as defined in SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurement” (“SFAS 157”), which requires key judgments affecting how fair value for such assets and liabilities is determined. In addition, the outcomes of valuations have a direct bearing on the carrying amounts of goodwill, mortgage servicing rights, investments and other postretirement benefit obligations. To determine the values of these assets and liabilities, as well as the extent to which related assets may be impaired, Management makes assumptions and estimates related to discount rates, asset returns, prepayment rates and other factors. The use of different discount rates or other valuation assumptions could produce significantly different results, which could affect the Company’s results of operations.

Impact of Inflation. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The principles require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.

Our primary assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates affect our performance more than general levels of inflation. Interest rates, however, do not necessarily move in the same direction or with the same magnitude as the price of goods and services, since such prices are affected by inflation. In a period of rapidly rising interest rates, the liquidity and maturity structure of our assets and liabilities are critical to the maintenance of acceptable performance levels.

The principal effect of inflation, as distinct from levels of interest rates, on earnings is in the area of non-interest expense. Expense items such as employee compensation, employee benefits and occupancy and equipment cost may increase because of inflation. Inflation also may increase the dollar value of the collateral securing loans that we have made. We are unable to determine the extent to which properties securing our loans have appreciated in dollar value due to inflation.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk

Our Risk When Interest Rates Change. The rates of interest we earn on assets and pay on liabilities generally is established contractually for a period of time. Market interest rates change over time. Accordingly, our results of operations, like those of other financial institutions, are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities. The risk associated with changes in interest rates and our ability to adapt to these changes is known as interest rate risk and is our most significant market risk.

How We Measure Our Risk of Interest Rate Changes. As part of our attempt to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates and comply with applicable regulations, we monitor our interest rate risk. In monitoring interest rate risk, we continually analyze and manage assets and liabilities based on their payment streams and interest rates, the timing of their maturities, and their sensitivity to actual or potential changes in market interest rates.

In order to minimize the potential for adverse effects of material and prolonged changes in interest rates on our results of operations, we adopted asset and liability management policies to better match the maturities and repricing terms of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. MutualBank’s Board of Directors sets and recommends asset and liability policies, which are implemented by the Asset and Liability Management Committee. The Asset and Liability Management Committee is chaired by the chief financial officer and is comprised of members of our senior management. The purpose of the Asset and Liability Management Committee is to communicate, coordinate and control asset/liability management issues consistent with our business plan and board-approved policies. This committee establishes and monitors the volume and mix of assets and funding sources taking into account relative costs and spreads, interest rate sensitivity and liquidity needs. The objectives are to manage assets and funding sources consistent with liquidity, capital adequacy, growth, risk and profitability goals. The Asset and Liability Management Committee generally meets monthly to review, among other things, economic conditions and interest rate outlook, current and projected liquidity needs and capital position, anticipated changes in the volume and mix of assets and liabilities and interest rate risk exposure limits versus current projections pursuant to a net present value of portfolio equity analysis and income simulations. At each meeting, the Asset and Liability Management Committee recommends appropriate strategy changes based on this review. The chief financial officer is responsible for reviewing and reporting on the effects of the policy implementations and strategies to the Board of Directors, at least quarterly.

In order to manage our assets and liabilities and achieve the desired liquidity, credit quality, interest rate risk, profitability and capital targets, we have sought to:

Originate and purchase adjustable rate mortgage loans and commercial business loans,

Originate shorter-duration consumer loans,

Manage our deposits to establish stable deposit relationships,

Acquire longer-term borrowings at fixed rates, when appropriate, to offset the negative impact of longer-term fixed rate loans in our loan portfolio, and

Limit the percentage of long-term fixed-rate loans in our portfolio.

Depending on the level of general interest rates, the relationship between long and short-term interest rates, market conditions and competitive factors, the Asset and Liability Management Committee may increase our interest rate risk position somewhat in order to maintain our net interest margin. We will continue to increase our emphasis on the origination of relatively short-term and/or adjustable rate loans. In addition, in an effort to avoid an increase in the percentage of long-term fixed-rate loans in our portfolio, in 2008, we sold $92.9 million of fixed rate, one-to four- family mortgage loans with a term to maturity of over 10 years in the secondary market.

The Asset and Liability Management Committee regularly reviews interest rate risk by forecasting the impact of alternative interest rate environments on net interest income and market value of portfolio equity, which is defined as the net present value of an institution’s existing assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, and evaluating such impacts against the maximum potential changes in net interest income and market value of portfolio equity that are authorized by our board of directors.

An internal asset-liability model provides MutualBank with the information presented in the following tables. The tables present the change in our net portfolio value at December 31, 2008 and 2007 that would occur upon an immediate and sustained change in market interest rates of 100 to 300 basis points as required by the OTS, and do not give any effect to actions that management might take to counteract that change. The changes in net portfolio value under all rate changes shown were within guidelines approved by the board of directors.

December 31, 2008
Net Portfolio Value
Changes									NPV as % of PV of Assets
In Rates		$ Amount		$ Change		% Change			NPV Ratio			Change

+300	bp		168,752		-16,815		-9	%		12.65	%		-50	bp
+200	bp		178,643		-6,924		-4	%		13.12	%		-3	bp
+100	bp		185,612		45		0	%		13.37	%		22	bp
0	bp		185,567							13.15	%
-100	bp	NM		NM		NM			NM			NM
-200	bp	NM		NM		NM			NM			NM
-300	bp	NM		NM		NM			NM			NM

December 31, 2007
Net Portfolio Value
Changes									NPV as % of PV of Assets
In Rates		$ Amount		$ Change		% Change			NPV Ratio			Change

+300	bp		64,185		-40,736		-39	%		7.27	%		-380	bp
+200	bp		79,394		-25,527		-24	%		8.77	%		-230	bp
+100	bp		91,904		-13,017		-12	%		9.93	%		-114	bp
0	bp		104,921							11.07	%
-100	bp		111,493		6,572		6	%		11.56	%		49	bp
-200	bp		111,662		6,741		6	%		11.44	%		36	bp
-300	bp		117,557		12,636		12	%		11.80	%		73	bp

NM= Not meaningful due to certain market interest rates would be below zero at that level of rate shock.

The internal asset-liability model uses certain assumptions in assessing the interest rate risk of MutualBank. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayment rates, deposit decay rates, and the market value of certain assets under differing interest rate scenarios, among others.

The decline in the interest rate sensitivity between December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is a result of the acquisition of MFB, the strategies employed to mitigate interest rate risk and the current interest rate environment.

As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing tables. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, if interest rates change, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the tables.

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Accountants’ Report and Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Muncie, Indiana

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MutualFirst Financial, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008. The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Our audits included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MutualFirst Financial, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 25, the Company changed its method of accounting for fair value measurements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 in 2008.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), MutualFirst Financial, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in I nternal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 23, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

BKD , LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

March 23, 2009

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2008 and 2007

	2008			2007
Assets

Cash and due from banks	$	21,654,283		$	21,003,114
Interest-bearing demand deposits		18,049,169			2,645,057
Cash and cash equivalents		39,703,452			23,648,171
Interest-bearing deposits		-			100,000
Investment securities available for sale		77,254,925			43,592,485
Investment securities held to maturity		9,675,891			—
Total investment securities		86,930,816			43,592,485
Loans held for sale		1,541,110			1,644,615
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $15,107,000 and $8,352,000		1,113,132,480			802,436,497
Premises and equipment		36,500,979			16,168,434
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		18,631,500			10,036,900
Investment in limited partnerships		4,560,690			3,246,468
Deferred income tax benefit		21,237,513			5,174,082
Cash value of life insurance		42,637,240			30,350,760
Core deposit and other intangibles		7,406,572			1,005,703
Goodwill		—			14,187,725
Other assets		16,545,134			10,925,172

Total assets	$	1,388,827,486		$	962,517,012

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	$	93,393,362		$	47,172,012
Interest-bearing		869,120,808			619,235,341
Total deposits		962,514,170			666,407,353
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		263,112,728			191,675,155
Other borrowings		15,991,690			4,962,827
Other liabilities		16,693,959			12,457,827
Total liabilities		1,258,312,547			875,503,162

Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $.01 par value
Authorized - 5,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding – 32,382 and 0 shares; liquidation preference $1,000 per share		324			—
Common stock, $.01 par value
Authorized - 20,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding – 6,984,754 and 4,226,638 shares		69,847			42,266
Additional paid-in capital – preferred stock		31,461,848			—
Additional paid-in capital – common stock		72,610,939			32,567,085
Retained earnings		29,989,003			56,725,785
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,027,956	)		(414,380	)
Unearned benefit plan shares		(1,589,066	)		(1,906,906	)
Total stockholders’ equity		130,514,939			87,013,850

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,388,827,486		$	962,517,012

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

	2008			2007			2006

Interest and Dividend Income
Loans receivable	$	61,127,725		$	53,686,297		$	53,672,382
Investment securities		3,213,272			2,110,916			1,920,823
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		719,886			461,949			459,255
Deposits with financial institutions		118,064			114,596			67,143
Total interest and dividend income		65,178,947			56,373,758			56,119,603

Interest Expense
Deposits		21,416,502			24,498,471			22,024,156
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		9,698,795			7,656,748			7,803,817
Other interest expense		523,793			71,833			62,424
Total interest expense		31,639,090			32,227,052			29,890,397

Net Interest Income		33,539,857			24,146,706			26,229,206
Provision for loan losses		7,020,000			2,240,000			2,068,000
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses		26,519,857			21,906,706			24,161,206

Other Income
Service fee income		6,256,694			4,831,161			4,369,508
Net realized losses on sales of available-for-sale securities		(3,715,531	)		—			—
Commissions		1,796,332			1,000,687			682,432
Equity in losses of limited partnerships		(157,575	)		(99,654	)		(181,366	)
Net gains (losses) on sales of loans		1,438,626			390,778			(669,389	)
Net servicing fees		(298,473	)		81,033			62,122
Increase in cash value of life insurance		1,322,724			1,230,000			1,075,403
Other income (loss)		(120,503	)		336,554			1,303,778
Total other income		6,522,294			7,770,559			6,642,488

Other Expenses
Salaries and employee benefits		19,117,989			14,758,489			14,617,254
Net occupancy expenses		1,911,495			1,549,331			1,507,067
Equipment expenses		1,629,898			1,318,932			1,221,991
Data processing fees		1,191,655			1,058,357			897,998
Advertising and promotion		1,461,225			887,237			966,224
Automated teller machine expense		968,078			723,128			699,435
Professional fees		1,133,012			764,007			992,984
Supplies		791,579			314,846			278,403
Goodwill impairment		28,968,993			—			—
Other expenses		6,451,461			3,781,096			3,837,923
Total other expenses		63,625,385			25,155,423			25,019,279

Income (Loss) Before Income Tax		(30,583,234	)		4,521,842			5,784,415
Income tax expense (credit)		(8,485,000	)		295,700			1,027,900

Net Income (Loss)	$	(22,098,234	)	$	4,226,142		$	4,756,515

Earnings Per Share
Basic	$	(4.22	)	$	1.03		$	1.13
Diluted		(4.22	)		1.02			1.11

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

														Accumulated
														Other			Unearned
			Paid-in					Paid-in						Comprehensive			Benefit
	Preferred		Capital		Common			Capital			Retained			Income			Plan
	Stock		Preferred		Stock			Common			Earnings			(Loss)			Shares			Total

Balances, January 1, 2006	$	—	$	—	$	45,522		$	33,889,584		$	57,968,477		$	(374,701	)	$	(2,735,262	)	$	88,793,620
Comprehensive income
Net income												4,756,515									4,756,515
Other comprehensive income, net of tax - unrealized holding gains on securities															19,967						19,967
Comprehensive income																					4,776,482
Cash dividends ($.58 per share)												(2,359,547	)								(2,359,547	)
Exercise of stock options						474			686,826												687,300
Stock repurchased						(2,330	)		(1,825,273	)		(3,107,881	)								(4,935,484	)
RRP shares earned									150,564												150,564
Tax benefit on stock options and RRP shares									45,400												45,400
ESOP shares earned									347,161									317,840			665,001
Reclassification of unearned RRP shares									(192,676	)								192,676			—
Cumulative effect of applying SAB No. 108												(559,018	)								(559,018	)

Balances, December 31, 2006						43,666			33,101,586			56,698,546			(354,734	)		(2,224,746	)		87,264,318
Comprehensive income
Net income												4,226,142									4,226,142
Other comprehensive income, net of tax - unrealized holding losses on securities															(59,646	)					(59,646	)
Comprehensive income																					4,166,496
Cash dividends ($.60 per share)												(2,440,121	)								(2,440,121	)
Exercise of stock options						154			208,459												208,613
Stock repurchased						(1,554	)		(1,032,936	)		(1,758,782	)								(2,793,272	)
RRP shares earned									21,056												21,056
Tax benefit on stock options and RRP shares									3,382												3,382
ESOP shares earned									265,538									317,840			583,378

Balances December 31, 2007						42,266			32,567,085			56,725,785			(414,380	)		(1,906,906	)		87,013,850
Comprehensive loss
Net loss											$	(22,098,234	)								(22,098,234	)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax - unrealized holding losses on securities															(1,503,877	)					(1,503,877	)
Comprehensive loss																					(23,602,111	)
Preferred stock issued		324		31,461,848					919,828												32,382,000
Common stock issued in acquisition, net of costs						29,117			39,758,791												39,787,908
Cash dividends ($.64 per share)												(3,489,747	)								(3,489,747	)
Stock repurchased						(1,536	)		(660,334	)		(1,148,801	)								(1,810,671	)
RRP shares earned									21,056												21,056
Tax expense on stock options and RRP shares									(20,529	)											(20,529	)
ESOP shares earned									25,042									317,840			342,882
Other adjustment															(109,699	)					(109,699	)

Balances December 31, 2008	$	324	$	31,461,848	$	69,847		$	72,610,939		$	29,989,003		$	(2,027,956	)	$	(1,589,066	)	$	130,514,939

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

							(As Restated)
	2008			2007			2006
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	(22,098,234	)	$	4,226,142		$	4,756,515
Items not requiring (providing) cash
Provision for loan losses		7,020,000			2,240,000			2,068,000
Impairment of goodwill		28,968,993			—			—
Depreciation and amortization		2,812,118			2,554,786			2,863,255
Deferred income tax		( 9,121,613	)		(758,000	)		(192,509	)
Loans originated for sale		(41,018,545	)		(24,427,954	)		(25,124,598	)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		41,737,644			24,262,686			26,303,525
(Gain) loss on loans held for sale		(1,438,626	)		(390,778	)		669,389
Loss on investments available for sale		3,715,531			—			—
Other equity adjustments		384,467			601,052			770,165
Change in
Interest receivable and other assets		1,811,318			10,356			(940,346	)
Interest payable and other liabilities		( 387,104	)		1,463,546			639,550
Cash value of life insurance		(1,322,724	)		(1,230,000	)		(1,075,403	)
Other adjustments		547,009			434,930			939,706
Net cash provided by operating activities		11,610,234			8,986,766			11,677,249

Investing Activities
Net change in interest earning deposits		100,000			193,000			—
Purchases of securities available for sale		(59,806,429	)		(7,810,905	)		(5,658,192	)
Proceeds from redemption-in-kind – investments		2,282,409			—			—
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of investments
Available for sale		9,342,878			4,357,422			3,946,193
Held to maturity		348,629			—			—
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		21,519,205			802,748			395,949
Net change in loans		4,435,817			(2,214,872	)		(6,082,431	)
Proceeds from sales of loans transferred to held for sale		51,577,741			—			23,442,643
Purchases of premises and equipment		(3,422,071	)		(2,146,757	)		(2,752,106	)
Proceeds from real estate owned sales		1,781,701			1,314,027			1,126,224
Cash received (paid) in acquisition, net		331,065			(515,257	)		3,894,267
Other investing activities		(61,895	)		100,671			1,350,350
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		28,429,050			(5,919,923	)		19,662,897

Financing Activities
Net change in
Noninterest-bearing, interest-bearing demand and savings deposits		(19,540,396	)		(543,777	)		15,877,096
Certificates of deposits		(16,808,138	)		(36,407,524	)		(9,399,360	)
Proceeds from FHLB advances		500,225,000			466,550,000			514,450,000
Repayment of FHLB advances		(521,337,084	)		(432,014,627	)		(542,731,831	)
Proceeds from other borrowings		11,500,000			3,907,394			—
Repayment of other borrowings		(4,383,382	)		(433,760	)		(419,506	)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		32,382,000			—			—
Stock repurchased		(1,810,671	)		(2,793,272	)		(4,935,484	)
Cash dividends		(3,489,747	)		(2,440,121	)		(2,359,547	)
Other financing activities		(721,585	)		(157,857	)		728,775
Net cash used in financing activities		(23,984,003	)		(4,333,544	)		(28,789,857	)

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents		16,055,281			(1,266,701	)		2,550,289

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year		23,648,171			24,914,872			22,364,583

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year	$	39,703,452		$	23,648,171		$	24,914,872

Additional Cash Flows Information
Interest paid	$	31,989,878		$	31,589,021		$	29,684,516
Income tax paid		900,000			445,000			1,225,000
Transfers from loans to foreclosed real estate		3,138,785			1,970,782			1,484,766
Mortgage servicing rights capitalized		823,032			241,131			437,194
Redemption in kind – investments		9,934,943			—			—

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 1:

Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accounting and reporting policies of MutualFirst Financial, Inc. (Company) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Mutual Federal Savings Bank (Bank) and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, First MFSB Corporation and Mutual Federal Investment Company and the wholly owned subsidiary of Mutual Federal Investment Company, Mutual Federal REIT, Inc., conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and reporting practices followed by the banking industry. The more significant of the policies are described below.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company is a thrift holding company whose principal activity is the ownership of the Bank. The Bank operates under a federal thrift charter and provides full banking services. As a federally chartered thrift, the Bank is subject to regulation by the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

The Bank generates mortgage, consumer and commercial loans and receives deposits from customers located primarily in north central Indiana. The Bank’s loans are generally secured by specific items of collateral including real property, consumer assets and business assets. First MFSB Corporation sells various insurance products and Mutual Federal Investment Company invests in various investment securities and loans through Mutual Federal REIT, Inc.

Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank, and the Bank’s subsidiaries, after elimination of all material intercompany transactions.

Cash Equivalents - The Company considers all liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Investment Securities - Securities available for sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported separately in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. Securities held to maturity are carried at amortized cost.

Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recorded using the interest method as interest income from securities. Realized gains and losses are recorded as net security gains (losses). Gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on the specific-identification method.

Declines in the fair value of securities below their cost that are other-than-temporary are reflected as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary losses, management considers the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and the Company’s ability and intent to hold the security for a period sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market. Market is determined using the aggregate method. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income based on the difference between estimated sales proceeds and aggregate cost.

Loans are carried at the principal amount outstanding. A loan is impaired when, based on current information or events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due (principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Payments with insignificant delays not exceeding 90 days are not considered impaired. Certain significant nonaccrual and substantially delinquent loans may be considered to be impaired. The Company considers its investment in one-to-four family residential loans and consumer loans to be homogeneous and therefore excluded from separate identification for evaluation of impairment. Interest income is accrued on the principal balances of loans. The accrual of interest on impaired and nonaccrual loans is discontinued when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payments as they become due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed when considered uncollectible. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received. Certain loan fees and direct costs are being deferred and amortized as an adjustment of yield on the loans over the contractual maturity of the loans.

Allowance for loan losses is maintained to absorb loan losses based on management’s continuing review and evaluation of the loan portfolio and its judgment as to the impact of economic conditions on the portfolio. The evaluation by management includes consideration of past loss experience, changes in the composition of the portfolio, the current condition and amount of loans outstanding, and the probability of collecting all amounts due. Impaired loans are measured by the present value of expected future cash flows, or the fair value of the collateral of the loan, if collateral dependent. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is charged against current period operating results. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the economic environment and market conditions. Management believes that as of December 31, 2008, the allowance for loan losses is adequate based on information currently available. A worsening or protracted economic decline in the areas within which the Bank operates would increase the likelihood of additional losses due to credit and market risks and could create the need for additional loss reserves.

Premises and equipment are carried at cost net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based principally on the estimated useful lives of the assets which range from 3 to 50 years. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred while major additions and improvements are capitalized. Gains and losses on dispositions are included in current operations.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock is a required investment for institutions that are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank system. The required investment in the common stock is based on a predetermined formula and is carried at cost.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Mortgage servicing rights on originated loans that have been sold are recorded at fair value. Capitalized servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated servicing revenues. Impairment of mortgage servicing rights is based on the fair value of those rights. Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flows based on a current market interest rate. For purposes of measuring impairment, the rights are stratified based on the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans. The predominant characteristic currently used for stratification is type of loan. The amount of impairment recognized is the amount by which the capitalized mortgage servicing rights for a stratum exceed their fair values.

Investment in limited partnerships is recorded primarily on the equity method of accounting. Losses due to impairment are recorded when it is determined that the investment no longer has the ability to recover its carrying amount. The benefits of low income housing tax credits associated with the investment are accrued when earned.

Intangible assets are being amortized on an accelerated basis over periods ranging from five to eleven years. Such assets are periodically evaluated as to the recoverability of their carrying value.

Goodwill is tested annually for impairment. If the implied fair value of goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, goodwill impairment is indicated and goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Subsequent increases in goodwill value are not recognized in the financial statements.

Income tax in the consolidated statements of income includes deferred income tax provisions or benefits for all significant temporary differences in recognizing income and expenses for financial reporting and income tax purposes. The Company files consolidated income tax returns with the Bank.

Earnings per share is computed based upon the weighted-average common and common equivalent shares outstanding during each year. Unearned ESOP shares and RRP shares which have not vested have been excluded from the computation of average shares outstanding.

Reclassifications of certain amounts in the 2007 and 2006 consolidated financial statements have been made to conform to the 2008 presentation.

Stock Options are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment At December 31, 2008, the Company has a stock-based employee compensation plan, which is described more fully in Note 23.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R. The Company selected the modified prospective application. Accordingly, after January 1, 2006, the Company began expensing the fair value of stock options granted, modified, repurchased or cancelled.

Current Economic Conditions. The current economic environment presents financial institutions with unprecedented circumstances and challenges which in some cases have resulted in large declines in the fair values of investments and other assets, constraints on liquidity and significant credit quality problems, including severe volatility in the valuation of real estate and other collateral supporting loans. The financial statements have been prepared using values and information currently available to the Company.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Given the volatility of the current economic conditions, the values of assets and liabilities recorded in the financial statements could change rapidly, resulting in material future adjustments in asset values, the allowance for loan losses, and capital that could negatively impact the Company’s ability to meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity.

Future Accounting Pronouncements. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)). During December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R). This Statement replaces SFAS 141 Business Combinations (Statement 141). SFAS 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (called the ’purchase method’) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This Statement defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses, including those sometimes referred to as “true mergers” or “mergers of equals” and combinations achieved without the transfer of consideration, for example, by contract alone or through the lapse of minority veto rights. This is broader than in Statement 141 which applied only to business combinations in which control was obtained by transferring consideration. This Statement requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. SFAS 141(R) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination and defines a bargain purchase as a business combination in which the total acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and it requires the acquirer to recognize that excess as a gain attributable to the acquirer. In contrast, Statement 141 required the “negative goodwill” amount to be allocated as a pro rata reduction of the amounts assigned to assets acquired. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No . 51 (SFAS 160) During December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statement, but separate from the parent’s equity. Before the Statement was issued these so-called minority interests were reported in the consolidated statement of financial position as liabilities or in the mezzanine section between liabilities and equity. The amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest must be clearly identified and presented in the consolidated statement of income. This Statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. Management does not anticipate that this Statement will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS 161”). During March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161. SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirement of SFAS 133 No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133) with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how derivative instrument and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations; and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. To meet those objectives, SFAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivative, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Early application is encouraged.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 162) During May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 162. This Statement identifies the sources of account principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Adoption of SFAS 162 will not be a change in the Company’s current accounting practices; therefore, it will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities (FSP EITF 03-6-1). During June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1. FSP EITF 03-6-1 clarifies whether instruments, such as restricted stock, granted in share-based payments are participating securities prior to vesting.

Such participating securities must be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method as described in SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share . FSP EITF 03-6-1 requires companies to treat unvested share-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable rights to dividend or dividend equivalents as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008, and requires a company to retrospectively adjust its earning per share data. Early adoption is not permitted. It is not expected that the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 will have a material effect on consolidated results of operations or earnings per share.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 2:

Impact of Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

The Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No . 109, on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company did not identify any material uncertain tax positions that it believes should be recognized in the financial statements.

In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 108, the Company made an adjustment to the 2006 financial statements to correct an error that had previously been considered immaterial. The error arose in 2001 as the Company recognized accretion relating to negative goodwill that had been allocated as a pro rata reduction of an investment in low income housing partnership. Related to this and subsequent to 2001, the Company recognized its portion of losses on the investment although due to the allocation of negative goodwill, the investment had no book value. The error was $559,000 and is shown as a cumulative effect of adopting SAB No. 108 in the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity.

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements . SFAS 157 clarifies the fair value measurement objective, its application in GAAP and establishes a framework that builds on current practice and requirements. The framework simplifies and, where appropriate, codifies the similar guidance in existing pronouncements and applies broadly to financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. The Statement clarifies the definition of fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, known as an exit-price definition of fair value. It also provides further guidance on the valuation techniques to be used in estimating fair value. Current disclosures about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities are expanded in this Statement. The disclosures focus on the methods used for fair value measurements and apply whether the assets and liabilities are measured at fair value in all periods, such as trading securities, or in only some periods, such as impaired assets. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

FASB Staff Position (FSP), FSP FAS 157-2, delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for those items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company anticipates increased financial disclosure as a result of the adoption of this Statement.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

On October 10, 2008 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FSP FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP FAS 157-3). FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key consideration in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP FAS 157-3 is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The Company adopted FSP FAS 157-3 for the period ended September 30, 2008 and the adoption did not have any significant impact on consolidated statements of financial position, consolidated statement of operations, or disclosures.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No . 115. SFAS 159 allows companies to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The changes in fair value are recognized in earnings and the assets and liabilities measured under this methodology are required to be displayed separately in the balance sheet. The main intent of the Statement is to mitigate the difficulty in determining reported earnings caused by a “mixed-attribute model” (or reporting some assets at fair value and others using a different valuation attribute such as amortized cost). The project is separated into two phases. This first phase addresses the creation of a fair value option for financial assets and liabilities. A second phase will address creating a fair value option for selected non-financial items. SFAS 159 is effective for all financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company was not impacted by the adoption of this Statement.

Note 3:

Acquisitions

On July 18, 2008, the Bank acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of MFB Corp., the holding company for MFB Financial (“MFB”) and MFB Statutory Trust I (“Trust”). MFB Corp. was merged into the Company, and MFB was merged into MutualBank. The Trust was also maintained as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

The Company issued 2,911,714 shares of its common stock and approximately $11,526,000 in cash to complete the transaction. As a result of the acquisition, the Company will have an opportunity to increase its customer base and continue to increase its market share. The purchase had a recorded acquisition price of $51,985,000, including goodwill of $14,781,000. Additionally, core deposit intangibles totaling $6,645,000 were recognized and will be amortized over approximately 11 years using the sum of the year digits or a weighted average term of 3.8 years. The goodwill generated as a result of this transaction is not deductible for tax purposes.

The combination was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. All assets and liabilities were recorded at their fair values as of July 18, 2008. The purchase accounting adjustments will be amortized over the life of the respective asset or liability. MFB's results of operations are included in the Company's consolidated income statement beginning July 18, 2008.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in thousands).

Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,179
Investments		23,490
Loans		378,075
Premises and equipment		18,565
Core deposit intangible		6,645
Goodwill		14,781
Other assets		19,263
Total assets acquired		471,998

Deposits		332,075
Borrowings		97,361
Other liabilities		5,346
Total liabilities assumed		434,782

Net assets acquired	$	37,216

The following pro forma information discloses the results of operations as though the merger had taken place at the beginning of the year.

Year Ended December 31	2008			2007

Net Interest Income	$	42,151		$	42,056

Net Income (Loss)	$	(21,202	)	$	8,244

Net Income per Share - Combined
Basic	$	(3.04	)	$	1.20
Diluted	$	(3.04	)	$	1.19

On August 18, 2006, the Bank acquired three branch offices in Warsaw, Wabash and Winchester, Indiana of Community First Bank and Trust from First Financial Bancorp of Hamilton, Ohio (First Financial). As a result of the acquisition, the Bank will have an opportunity to increase its deposit base and reduce transaction costs. The Bank also expects to reduce costs through economies of scale.

The aggregate cash received was $3,690,000. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.

Cash and cash equivalents	$	204
Loans		6,502
Premises and equipment		803
Core deposit intangible		313
Goodwill		842
Total assets acquired		8,664

Deposits		12,327
Other liabilities		27
Total liabilities assumed		12,354

Net liabilities assumed	$	3,690

The only significant intangible asset acquired was the core deposit base, which has a useful life of approximately ten years and will be amortized using an accelerated method. The $842,000 of goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes ratably over fifteen years.

Note 4:

Restriction on Cash

The Bank is required to maintain reserve funds in cash and/or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank. The reserve required at December 31, 2008 was $3,940,000.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 5:

Investment Securities

	2008
Available for Sale Securities	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value

Mortgage-backed securities	$	14,771	$	393	$	(1	)	$	15,163
Collateralized mortgage obligations		43,821		786		(968	)		43,639
Federal agencies		499		3		—			502
Municipals		857		—		—			857
Small Business Administration		71		—		(1	)		70
Corporate obligations		18,797		9		(3,279	)		15,527
Marketable equity securities		1,635		—		(138	)		1,497

Total investment securities	$	80,451	$	1,191	$	(4,387	)	$	77,255

Held to Maturity Securities

Mortgage-backed securities	$	5,498	$	247	$	(762	)	$	4,983
Collateralized mortgage obligations		4,178		138		(771	)		3,545

Total investment securities	$	9,676	$	385	$	(1,533	)	$	8,528

	2007
Description of Available for Sale Securities	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value

Mortgage-backed securities	$	2,310	$	45	$	(3	)	$	2,352
Collateralized mortgage obligations		8,327		38		(43	)		8,322
Federal agencies		500		—		(2	)		498
Small Business Administration		108		—		(1	)		107
Corporate obligations		16,655		11		(267	)		16,399
Marketable equity securities		16,382		—		(468	)		15,914

Total investment securities	$	44,282	$	94	$	(784	)	$	43,592

Marketable equity securities consist of shares in mutual funds which invest in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Certain investments in debt and marketable equity securities are reported in the financial statements at an amount less than their historical cost. Total fair value of these investments at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $24,618,000 and $28,308,000, which is approximately 29 percent and 65 percent of the Company’s investment portfolio at those dates. These declines primarily resulted from changes in market conditions.

Based on evaluation of available evidence, including recent changes in market interest rates, management believes the declines in fair value for these securities are temporary.

Should the impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other-than-temporary impairment is identified.

During 2008, the Bank determined that two trust preferred securities and one corporate bond were other than temporarily impaired. The amount of the impairment totaled $1,350,000 and is reflected in the statement of operations. The Bank also sold its shares of the AMF Ultra Short and AMF Ultra Short Mortgage Funds for cash and securities. This redemption in-kind resulted in a loss of $2,571,000 and the receipt of $9,935,000 of held to maturity mortgage backed securities.

The following tables show our investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2008 and 2007:

	2008
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
Available for Sale	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses

Mortgage-backed securities	$	228	$	(1	)	$	—	$	—		$	228	$	(1	)
Collateralized mortgage obligations		3,841		(516	)		1,559		(452	)		5,400		(968	)
Federal agencies		—		—			—		—			—		—
Small Business Administration		—		—			71		(1	)		71		(1	)
Corporate obligations		9,407		(2,100	)		2,265		(1,179	)		11,672		(3,279	)
Marketable equity securities		—		—			1,497		(138	)		1,497		(138	)

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	13,476	$	(2,617	)	$	5,392	$	(1,770	)	$	18,868	$	(4,387	)

Held to Maturity

Mortgage-backed securities	$	3,356	$	(762	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,356	$	(762	)
Collateralized mortgage obligations		2,394		(771	)		—		—			2,394		(771	)

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	5,750	$	(1,533	)	$	—	$	—		$	5,750	$	(1,533	)

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

	2007
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
Description of Available for Sale Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses

Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	—		$	270	$	(3	)	$	270	$	(3	)
Collateralized mortgage obligations		—		—			3,720		(43	)		3,720		(43	)
Federal agencies		—		—			498		(2	)		498		(2	)
Small Business Administration		107		(1	)		—		—			107		(1	)
Corporate obligations		2,730		(231	)		5,463		(36	)		8,193		(267	)
Marketable equity securities		—		—			15,520		(468	)		15,520		(468	)

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	2,837	$	(232	)	$	25,471	$	(552	)	$	28,308	$	(784	)

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale at December 31, 2008, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	2008
	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
Description Securities	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value

Within one year	$	1,800	$	1,803	$	—	$	—
One to five years		8,009		7,824		—		—
Five to ten years		499		502		—		—
After ten years		8,988		5,900		—		—
		19,296		16,029		—		—
Mortgage-backed securities		14,771		15,163		5,498		4,983
Collateralized mortgage obligations		43,821		43,639		4,178		3,545
Municipals		857		857		—		—
Small Business Administration		71		70		—		—
Marketable equity securities		1,635		1,497		—		—

Totals	$	80,451	$	77,255	$	9,676	$	8,528

The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits and for other purposes, was $1,997,000 and $16,018,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale during 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $21,519,000, $803,000 and $396,000. Gross gains of $204,000, $0, and $0 in 2008, 2007 and 2006 were recognized in those sales. Gross losses of $2,570,000, $0 and $0 in 2008, 2007 and 2006 were recognized on those sales.

Other than temporarily impaired losses were recognized on available for sale investments during 2008 of $1,350,000.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 6:

Loans and Allowance

	2008			2007

Real estate loans
One-to-four family	$	519,822		$	429,373
Multi-family		2,698			3,929
Commercial		250,693			82,116
Construction and development		12,232			13,560
		785,445			528,978
Consumer loans
Auto		22,715			22,917
Home equity		66,460			27,232
Home improvement		45,339			45,156
Mobile home		727			992
Recreational vehicles		79,884			77,805
Boats		46,928			47,816
Other		6,339			3,593
		268,392			225,511
Commercial business loans		75,290			56,764
Total loans		1,129,127			811,253

Undisbursed loans in process		(4,372	)		(3,984	)
Unamortized deferred loan costs, net		3,484			3,519
Allowance for loan losses		(15,107	)		(8,352	)

Net loans	$	1,113,132		$	802,436

	2008			2007			2006

Allowance for loan losses
Balances, January 1	$	8,352		$	8,156		$	8,100
Provision for losses		7,020			2,240			2,068
Allowance acquired in acquisition		2,954			—			—
Recoveries on loans		1,213			679			291
Loans charged off		(4,432	)		(2,723	)		(2,303	)

Balances, December 31	$	15,107		$	8,352		$	8,156

At December 31, 2008 and 2007, accruing loans delinquent 90 days or more totaled $1,473,000 and $1,421,000. Non-accruing loans at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $19,998,000 and $8,949,000.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Impaired loans totaled $20,178,000 and $9,371,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. An allowance for loan losses of $781,000 and $355,000 relates to impaired loans of $2,973,000 and $752,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. At December 31, 2008, impaired loans of $17,205,000 had no related allowance for loan losses.

Interest of $839,000, $449,000 and $203,000 was recognized on average impaired loans of $16,481,000, $9,488,000 and $6,288,000 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Interest of $140,000, $151,000 and $7,000 was recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Note 7:

Related Party Transactions

The Bank has entered into transactions with certain directors, executive officers and significant shareholders of the Company and Bank and their affiliates or associates (“related parties”). Such transactions were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms and conditions, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other customers, and did not, in the opinion of management, involve more than normal credit risk or present other unfavorable features.

The aggregate amount of loans, as defined, to such related parties was as follows:

Balances, January 1, 2007	$	4,215
Change in composition		3,303
New loans, including renewals		3,421
Payments, etc., including renewals		(3,364	)

Balances, December 31, 2008	$	7,575

Note 8:

Premises and Equipment

	2008			2007

Cost
Land	$	13,248		$	5,624
Buildings and land improvements		25,272			13,609
Equipment		14,381			11,622
Total cost		52,901			30,855
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(16,400	)		(14,687	)

Net	$	36,501		$	16,168

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 9:

Investment In Limited Partnerships

	2008		2007

Pedcor Investments 1990-XIII (99.00 percent ownership)	$	625	$	625
Pedcor Investments 1997-XXVIII (99.00 percent ownership)		2,145		2,309
Pedcor Investments 1987-XXXI (49.50 percent ownership)		361		—
Pedcor Investments 2000-XLI (50.00 percent ownership)		862		—
Pedcor Investments 2001-LI (9.90 percent ownership)		268		312
Pedcor Investments 2008-CIII (21.50 percent ownership)		300		—

	$	4,561	$	3,246

The limited partnerships build, own and operate apartment complexes. The Company records its equity in the net income or loss of the limited partnerships based on the Company’s interest in the partnerships. The Company recorded losses from these limited partnerships of $(158,000), $(100,000) and $(181,000) for 2008, 2007 and 2006. In addition, the Company has recorded the benefit of low income housing credits of $1,214,000, $811,000 and $801,000 for 2008, 2007 and 2006. Combined financial statements for the limited partnerships recorded under the equity method of accounting are as follows:

	2008			2007

Combined condensed balance sheets
Assets
Cash	$	7,487		$	179
Land and property		43,038			29,243
Other assets		4,693			1,642

Total assets	$	55,218		$	31,064

Liabilities
Notes payable	$	46,189		$	28,228
Other liabilities		1,835			847
Total liabilities		48,024			29,075

Partners' equity (deficit)
General partners		(3,120	)		(2,885	)
Limited partners		10,314			4,874
Total partners’ equity		7,194			1,989

Total liabilities and partners' equity	$	55,218		$	31,064

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

	2008			2007			2006
Combined condensed statements of operations
Total revenue	$	5,994		$	4,007		$	3,400
Total expenses		(6,833	)		(4,647	)		(4,293	)

Net loss	$	(839	)	$	(640	)	$	(893	)

Note 10:

Core Deposit Intangible

	2008		2007

Core deposits	$	6,797	$	909
Other		610		97

	$	7,407	$	1,006

Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, was $805,000 and $247,000, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the following five years is:

2009	$	1,525
2010		1,348
2011		1,160
2012		962
2013		782
Thereafter		1,630

	$	7,407

Note 11:

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, were:

	2008			2007

Balance as of January 1	$	14,188		$	13,787
Goodwill acquired during the year		14,781			401
Impairment losses		(28,969	)		—

Balance as of December 31	$	—		$	14,188

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

During the fourth quarter the decline in the market value of the Company’s stock below its book value and the decline in the economic environment in which the Company operates caused management to engage a third party business valuation specialist to perform the annual impairment test of goodwill. The third-party specialist used three methods of evaluation to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. The methods considered comparable transactions based on pricing ratios recently paid in the sale or merger of comparable banking franchises, the Company’s trading price and application of an industry based control premium and the present value of projected dividends and a terminal value. The value of each approach was weighted and an overall summary of the Company’s fair value was calculated.

The step one impairment test indicated the fair value of the reporting unit was below the carrying amount as of December 31, 2008. The third-party was then engaged to perform step two impairment testing by allocating the fair value of the Company to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit to determine the implied fair value of the Company. The implied fair value of goodwill was then compared to the actual carrying amount of goodwill. From this testing, management determined the carrying amount of goodwill exceeded, in its entirety, the implied fair value of goodwill.

Note 12:

Deposits

	2008		2007

Noninterest-bearing demand	$	93,393	$	47,172
Interest-bearing demand		156,787		117,863
Savings		79,111		50,388
Money market savings		47,584		22,664
Certificates and other time deposits of $100,000 or more		192,445		127,277
Other certificates		393,194		301,043

Total deposits	$	962,514	$	666,407

Certificates including other time deposits of $100,000 or more maturing in years ending December 31:

2009	$	356,942
2010		88,248
2011		74,384
2012		27,930
2013		37,505
Thereafter		630

	$	585,639

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 13:

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

Maturities Years Ending December 31

2009	$	102,152
2010		88,923
2011		34,486
2012		30,307
2013		5,075
Thereafter		2,170

	$	263,113

At December 31, 2008, the Company has pledged $521,319,000 in qualifying first mortgage loans and investment securities as collateral for advances and outstanding letters of credit. Advances, at interest rates from 0.65 to 7.33 percent at December 31, 2008, are subject to restrictions or penalties in the event of prepayment.

At December 31, 2008, the Company had a total of $62 million in putable advances with Federal Home Loan Bank.

Note 14:

Other Borrowings

MutualFirst Financial, Inc. borrowed $11,500,000 from Bank of America for the cash portion of the purchase of MFB Corp. The Company borrowed $7,000,000 at a fixed rate of 5.91% and $4,500,000 at an adjustable rate of the three-month labor rate plus 175 basis points or the Prime rate, at borrowers discretion on a quarterly basis. At December 31, 2008, the interest rate on the adjustable portion of this note was 3.25%, which was based on the Prime rate. This loan matures in July 2012.

The Company has a $3,000,000 revolving line of credit from Bank of America expiring in July 2009. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had $0 and $497,000 borrowed against this line, respectively. The line is collateralized by the Bank’s stock. Interest is payable quarterly and is either based on the lender’s Prime rate or the three month LIBOR rate plus 175 basis points. At December 31, 2008, the interest rate was 3.25%, which was based on the Prime rate. Subsequent to December 31, 2008 the revolving line of credit was closed.

As a condition of the Company’s loan agreements with Bank of America, MutualFirst must maintain an annual ROA of .50%. As of December 31, 2008 the Company was not in compliance with this debt covenant. This covenant has been waived by Bank of America.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

The Company assumed $5,000,000 in debentures as the result of the acquisition of MFB in 2008. In July 2005, MFB formed MFBC Statutory Trust (MFBC), as wholly owned business trust, to sell trust preferred securities. The proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities were used by the trust to purchase an equivalent amount of subordinated debentures from MFB. The junior subordinated debentures are the sole assets of MFBC and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company. The junior subordinated debentures and the trust preferred securities pay interest and dividends, respectively, on a quarterly basis. The securities bear a fixed rate of interest of 6.22% for the first five years, resetting quarterly thereafter at the prevailing three-month LIBOR rate plus 170 basis points. The Company may redeem the trust preferred securities, in whole or in part, without penalty, on or after September 15, 2010, or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events with the payment of a premium upon redemption. These securities mature on September 15, 2035. The net balance of the note as of December 31, 2008 was $3,845,000 due to the fair value of the note as of the acquisition.

The Bank has a noninterest-bearing, unsecured term note payable to Pedcor Investments 1997-XXVIII, L.P. of $647,000 and $1,073,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2007 payable in semiannual installments through January 1, 2010. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Bank was obligated under an irrevocable direct pay letter of credit for the benefit of a third party in the amount of $628,000 and $1,038,000, respectively, relating to this note and the financing for an apartment project by Pedcor Investments 1997-XXVIII L.P.

The Bank also had a noninterest-bearing, unsecured term note payable to Pedcor Investments 1997-XXIX, L.P. The note, which was payable in annual installments through August 15, 2008, had a balance of $0 and $50,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2007.

The Bank reclassified $3,411,000 as of December 31, 2007, due to an overdraft at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis.

Note Payable Principal Payments Due in Years Ending December 31

2009	$	921
2010		2,226
2011		2,000
2012		2,000
2013		5,000

Total notes payable	$	12,147

Other borrowings consisted of the following components as of December 31:

	2008		2007

Notes payable	$	12,147	$	1,552
Subordinate debentures		3,845		—
Other		—		3,411

Total	$	15,992	$	4,963

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 15:

Loan Servicing

Loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of these loans consist of the following:

	2008		2007		2006

Loans serviced for
Freddie Mac	$	384,808	$	137,973	$	139,571
Fannie Mae		2,148		1,936		3,180
Federal Home Loan Bank		37,070		33,998		25,914
Other investors		4,064		4,757		7,708

	$	428,090	$	178,664	$	176,373

The aggregate fair value of capitalized mortgage servicing rights is based on comparable market values and expected cash flows, with impairment assessed based on portfolio characteristics including product type and interest rates. The fair value of mortgage servicing rights at December 31, 2008 was $2,776,000.

	2008			2007			2006

Mortgage Servicing Rights
Balances, January 1	$	1,126		$	1,261		$	1,175
Servicing rights capitalized		823			241			437
Servicing rights acquired		1,844			—			—
Amortization of servicing rights		(517	)		(376	)		(351	)
		3,276			1,126			1,261
Valuation allowance		(500	)		—			—

Balances, December 31	$	2,776		$	1,126		$	1,261

The fair value of servicing rights subsequently measured using the amortization method was as follows:

	2008		2007
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Fair value, beginning of period	$	1,629	$	1,660
Fair value, end of period		2,776		1,629

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Activity in the valuation allowance for mortgage servicing right was as follows:

	2008		2007		2006

Balance, beginning of year	$	—	$	—	$	—
Additions		500		—		—
Reductions		—		—		—

Balances, end of year	$	500	$	—	$	—

Note 16:

Income Tax

	2008			2007			2006

Income tax expense
Currently payable
Federal	$	281		$	1,012		$	960
State		356			42			260
Deferred
Federal		(7,781	)		(691	)		(279	)
State		(1,341	)		(67	)		87

Total income tax expense (credit)	$	(8,485	)	$	296		$	1,028

Reconciliation of federal statutory to actual tax expense
Federal statutory income tax at 34%	$	(10,398	)	$	1,537		$	1,967
Effect of state income taxes		(650	)		(17	)		229
Low income housing credits		(1,214	)		(811	)		(801	)
Tax-exempt income		(539	)		(525	)		(459	)
Goodwill impairment		4,280			—			—
Other		36			112			92

Actual tax expense (credit)	$	(8,485	)	$	296		$	1,028

Effective tax rate		(27.74	)%		6.50	%		17.8	%

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

The components of the deferred asset included on the balance sheets are as follows:

	2008			2007

Assets
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale	$	1,095		$	276
Allowance for loan losses		6,072			3,108
Deferred compensation		3,102			2,858
Business tax and AMT credit carryovers		4,891			1,936
Capital loss carryover		1,627			—
Net operating loss carryover		1,940			—
Goodwill impairment		5,682			—
Other		2,265			789
Total assets		26,674			8,967

Liabilities
Depreciation and amortization		(468	)		(951	)
FHLB stock		(738	)		(510	)
State income tax		(525	)		(199	)
Loan fees		(184	)		(387	)
Investments in limited partnerships		(1,649	)		(1,279	)
Mortgage servicing rights		(1,152	)		(467	)
Total liabilities		(4,716	)		(3,793	)

Valuation Allowance
Beginning balance		—			—
(Increase) decrease during period		(720	)		—
Ending balance		(720	)		—
Net deferred tax asset	$	21,238		$	5,174

The Company has unused business income tax credits of $4,718,000 that begin to expire in 2025. In addition, the Company has an AMT credit carryover of $173,000 with an unlimited carryover period.

Retained earnings include approximately $14,743,000 for which no deferred income tax liability has been recognized. This amount represents an allocation of income to bad debt deductions as of December 31, 1987 for tax purposes only. Reduction of amounts so allocated for purposes other than tax bad debt losses or adjustments arising from carryback of net operating losses would create income for tax purposes only, which income would be subject to the then-current corporate income tax rate. The unrecorded deferred income tax liability on the above amounts was approximately $5,013,000.

The Company’s federal income tax returns have been closed without audit by the IRS through its year ended December 31, 2004.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 17:

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

	2008
	Before-Tax Amount			Tax Benefit		Net-of-Tax Amount
Unrealized losses on securities
Unrealized holding losses arising during the year	$	(6,206	)	$	2,458	$	(3,748	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income		(3,716	)		1,472		(2,244	)

Net unrealized losses	$	(2,490	)	$	986	$	(1,504	)

	2007
	Before-Tax Amount			Tax Benefit		Net-of-Tax Amount
Unrealized losses on securities
Unrealized holding losses arising during the year	$	(99	)	$	39	$	(60	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income		—			—		—

Net unrealized losses	$	(99	)	$	39	$	(60	)

	2006
	Before-Tax Amount		Tax Expense			Net-of-Tax Amount
Unrealized gains on securities
Unrealized holding gains arising during the year	$	33	$	(13	)	$	20
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income		—		—			—

Net unrealized gains	$	33	$	(13	)	$	20

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, included in stockholders’ equity, are as follows:

	2008			2007			2006
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale	$	3,176		$	686		$	588
Net loss relating to benefit liability		182			—			—
		3,358			686			587
Tax effect (benefit)		(1,330	)		(272	)		(233	)

Net of tax amount	$	2,028		$	414		$	355

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 18:

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

In the normal course of business there are outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, which are not included in the accompanying financial statements. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making such commitments as it does for instruments that are included in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

Financial instruments whose contract amount represents credit risk as of December 31 were as follows:

	2008		2007		2006

Loan commitments	$	164,922	$	93,662	$	82,146
Standby letters of credit		7,065		4,160		6,492

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation. Collateral held varies, but may include residential real estate, income-producing commercial properties, or other assets of the borrower.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.

The Company and Bank are also subject to claims and lawsuits which arise primarily in the ordinary course of business. It is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate resolution of such claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Company.

The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain officers that provide for the continuation of salary and certain benefits for a specified period of time under certain conditions. Under the terms of the agreement, these payments could occur in the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined, along with other specific conditions.

Commitments to originate mortgage loans that will be held for resale are recorded at their fair values with subsequent changes in fair value included in current earnings. Commitments to originate or acquire fixed-rate mortgage loans that will be held for resale were $12,500,000 and $5,300,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 19:

Stockholders’ Equity

The Company is not subject to any regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to its stockholders.

Without prior approval, current regulations allow the Bank to pay dividends to the Company not exceeding retained net income for the previous two calendar years. In the event the Bank becomes unable to pay dividends to the Company, the Company may not be able to service its debt, pay its other obligations or pay dividends on its common stock. At December 31, 2008, the Bank had no regulatory approval to pay dividends to the Company.

Note 20:

Capital Purchase Program

On December 23, 2008, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement (Purchase Agreement) with the U.S. Treasury (Treasury), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell (a) 32,382 of the Company’s fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock and (b) a warrant to purchase 625,135 shares of the Company’s common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $32,382,000 in cash.

The preferred Stock qualifies as Tier I capital and will pay cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years and 9% per annum thereafter. The preferred Stock is non-voting except with respect to certain matters affecting the rights of the holders thereof, and may be redeemed by the Company at any time with regulatory approval. The Warrant has a ten year term and is immediately exercisable with an exercise price of $7.77 per share of Common Stock. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Treasury has agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of Common Stock issued upon exercise of the Warrant.

In the Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed that, until such time as Treasury ceases to own any debt or equity securities of the Company, acquired pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company will take all necessary action to ensure that its benefit plans with respect to its senior executive officers comply with Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) as implemented by any guidance or regulation under EESA that has been issued and is in effect as of the date of issuance of the Preferred Stock and the Warrant, and has agreed to not adopt any benefit plans with respect to, or which cover, its senior executive officers that do not comply with the EESA, and the applicable executives have consented to the foregoing.

Upon issuance of the Preferred Stock on December 23, 2008, the ability of the Company to declare or pay dividends on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, shares of its Common Stock will be subject to restrictions, including the Company’s restriction against increasing dividends from the last quarterly cash dividend per share of $.16 declared on the Common Stock prior to December 23, 2008. The redemption, purchase or other acquisition of trust preferred securities of the Company or its affiliates also is restricted. These restrictions will terminate the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the date of issuance of the Preferred Stock or (b) the date on which the Preferred Stock has been redeemed in whole or Treasury has transferred all of the Preferred Stock to third parties. In addition, the ability of the Company to declare or pay dividends, or repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, shares of its Common Stock will be subject to restrictions in the event that the Company fails to declare and pay full dividends on its Preferred Stock.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 21:

Regulatory Capital

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies and is assigned to a capital category. The assigned capital category is largely determined by three ratios that are calculated according to the regulations: total risk adjusted capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, and core leverage ratios. The ratios are intended to measure capital relative to assets and credit risk associated with those assets and off-balance sheet exposures of the entity. The capital category assigned to an entity can also be affected by qualitative judgments made by regulatory agencies about the risk inherent in the entity’s activities that are not part of the calculated ratios.

There are five capital categories defined in the regulations, ranging from well capitalized to critically undercapitalized. Classification of a bank in any of the undercapitalized categories can result in actions by regulators that could have a material effect on a bank’s operations. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Bank was categorized as well capitalized and met all subject capital adequacy requirements. There are no conditions or events since December 31, 2008 that management believes have changed the Bank’s classification.

The Bank’s actual and required capital amounts and ratios are as follows:

	Actual					Required for Adequate Capital					To Be Well Capitalized
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio

As of December 31, 2008
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	150,164		13.8	%	$	87,091		8.0	%	$	108,864		10.0	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)		136,556		12.5	%		43,546		4.0	%		65,318		6.0	%
Core capital (to adjusted total assets)		136,556		9.9	%		55,393		4.0	%		69,242		5.0	%
Core capital (to adjusted tangible assets)		136,556		9.9	%		27,697		2.0	%		N/A		N/A
Tangible capital (to adjusted total assets)		136,556		9.9	%		20,773		1.5	%		N/A		N/A

As of December 31, 2007
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	77,968		10.9	%	$	57,236		8.0	%	$	71,546		10.0	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)		70,440		9.9	%		28,618		4.0	%		42,927		6.0	%
Core capital (to adjusted total assets)		70,440		7.5	%		37,785		4.0	%		47,231		5.0	%
Core capital (to adjusted tangible assets)		70,440		7.5	%		18,892		2.0	%		N/A		N/A
Tangible capital (to adjusted total assets)		70,440		7.5	%		14,169		1.5	%		N/A		N/A

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 22:

Employee Benefits

The Company has a retirement savings 401(k) plan in which substantially all employees may participate. The contributions are discretionary and determined annually. The Company matches employees' contributions at the rate of 50 percent for the first $600 of participant contributions to the 401(k) and made a contribution to the plan of 3 percent of qualified compensation. The Company’s expense for the plan was $505,000, $330,000 and $250,000 for 2008, 2007 and 2006.

The Company has a supplemental retirement plan and deferred compensation arrangements for the benefit of certain officers. The Company also has deferred compensation arrangements with certain directors whereby, in lieu of currently receiving fees, the directors or their beneficiaries will be paid benefits for an established period following the director’s retirement or death. These arrangements are informally funded by life insurance contracts which have been purchased by the Company. The Company records a liability for these vested benefits based on the present value of future payments. The Company’s expense for the plan was $717,000, $682,000 and $683,000 for 2008, 2007 and 2006.

The Company has an ESOP covering substantially all of its employees. At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company had 158,922, 190,706 and 222,492 unearned ESOP shares with a fair value of $1,072,724, $2,658,000 and $4,717,000. Shares are released to participants proportionately as ESOP debt is repaid. Dividends on allocated shares are recorded as dividends and charged to retained earnings. Dividends on unallocated shares are used to repay the loan. Compensation expense is recorded equal to the fair market value of the stock committed-to-be-released when contributions, which are determined annually by the Board of Directors of the Company and Bank, are made to the ESOP. Expense under the ESOP for 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $343,000, $583,000 and $665,000. The following table provides information on ESOP shares at December 31.

	2008		2007		2006

Allocated shares		256,089		207,274		186,637
Suspense shares		158,922		190,709		222,492
Committed-to-be released shares		31,783		31,783		31,783

The Company has a Recognition and Retention Plan (RRP) for the award of up to 232,784 shares of the common stock of the Company to directors and executive officers. Common stock awarded under the RRP vests ratably over a three or five-year period commencing with the date of the grants. Expense recognized on the vested shares totaled approximately $21,000, $21,000 and $151,000 in 2008, 2007 and 2006.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

A summary of the status of the Company’s RRP shares as of December 31, 2007 and changes during the year then ended, is presented below:

	2008
	Shares		Weighted- Average Grant-Date Fair Value

RRP, beginning of year		9,834	$	25.66
Vested		4,917		25.66

RRP, end of year		4,917	$	25.66

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, there was $0 and $21,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to RRP share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.5 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, was $66,000, $99,000 and $119,000, respectively.

Note 23:

Stock Option Plan

Under the Company’s stock option plan, which has been accounted for in accordance with FAS 123(R), Share-Based Payments and related interpretations, the Company grants selected executives and other key employees and directors incentive and non-qualified stock option awards which vest and become fully exercisable at the discretion of the stock option committee as the options are granted. The Company is authorized to grant options for up to 581,961 shares of the Company’s common stock. Under certain provisions of the plan, the number of shares available for grant may be increased without shareholder approval by the amount of shares surrendered as payment of the exercise price of the stock option and by the number of shares of common stock of the Company that could be repurchased by the Company using proceeds from the exercise of stock options. The following is a summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plan and changes in that plan for 2007.

	2008
Options	Shares			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Outstanding, beginning of year		385,613		$	16.98
Exercised		—			22.00
Issued in acquisition		296,555			9.90
Forfeited/expired		(38,670	)		—

Outstanding, end of year		643,498		$	13.99	5.7 years	$	—

Options exercisable at year end		643,498

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, was $0, $79,000 and $311,000, respectively.

Cash received from options exercised under all share-based payment arrangements for years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $0, $209,000 and $687,000, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from options exercised and RRP shares vested totaled $21,000, $3,000 and $45,000, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.

Note 24:

Stock Repurchase Plan

On December 22, 2004, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program for up to 471,000 of the outstanding common shares of the Company. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had purchased 471,000 shares under the program.

On September 12, 2007, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program for up to 215,000 of the outstanding common shares of the Company. As of

July 8, 2008 all 215,000 shares under this plan had been purchased.

On August 13, 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program for up to 350,000 of the outstanding common shares of the Company. Shares may be purchased from time to time in the open market and in large block privately negotiated transactions. The Company is not obligated to purchase any shares under the program, and the program may be discontinued at any time before the maximum number of shares specified by the program are purchased. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had purchased 10,000 shares under the program.

Note 25:

Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share were computed as follows:

	2008
	Loss			Weighted- Average Shares		Per-Share Amount
Basic Earnings Per Share
Net loss	$	(22,098	)		5,249,135	$	(4.21	)
Dividends and amortization on preferred stock		(31	)
Income available to common stockholders		(22,129	)		5,249,135	$	(4.22	)
Effect of Dilutive Securities
Stock options					—
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Income (loss) available to common stockholders and assumed conversions	$	(22,129	)		5,249,135	$	(4.22	)

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

	2007
	Income		Weighted- Average Shares		Per-Share Amount
Basic Earnings Per Share
Income available to common stockholders	$	4,226		4,103,940	$	1.03
Effect of Dilutive Securities
Stock options				47,233
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Income available to common stockholders and assumed conversions	$	4,226		4,151,173	$	1.02

	2006
	Income		Weighted- Average Shares		Per-Share Amount
Basic Earnings Per Share
Income available to common stockholders	$	4,757		4,196,059	$	1.13
Effect of Dilutive Securities
Stock options				77,980
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Income available to common stockholders and assumed conversions	$	4,757		4,274,039	$	1.11

Options to purchase 638,318, 91,000, and 75,000 shares of common stock at $13.89, $25.02 and $25.66 per share, respectively, were outstanding at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

Warrants to purchase 625,135, 0 and 0 shares of common stock at $7.77, $0 and $0 per share, respectively, were outstanding at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 26:

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), Fair Value Measurements . FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 has been applied prospectively as of the beginning of the year.

FAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2

Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities

ITEMS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Available-for-sale Securities

Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. The Company uses a third-party provider to provide market prices on its securities and no securities are priced as Level 1 securities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed, collateralized mortgage, federal agency and certain corporate obligation securities. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy and include certain corporate obligation securities.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Available-for-sale securities	$	77,255	$	—	$	70,938	$	6,317

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the year ended December 31, 2008 of recurring fair value measurements recognized in the accompanying balance sheet using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs:

	Available-for- sale securities

Beginning balance	$	9,923

Total realized and unrealized gains and losses
Included in net income		(1,350	)
Included in other comprehensive income		(2,745	)
Purchases, issuances and settlements		(11	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		500

Ending balance	$	6,317

Total gains or losses for the period included in net income attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date	$	1,350

ITEMS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A NON-RECURRING BASIS

From time to time, certain assets may be recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These non-recurring fair value adjustments typically are a result of the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or a write-down occurring during the period. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for certain assets that are recorded at fair value.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Impaired Loans

Loans for which it is probable that the Bank will not collect all principal and interest due according to contractual terms are measured for impairment in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standard No. 114 (FAS 114), Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan . Allowable methods for estimating fair value include using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans or, where a loan is determined not to be collateral dependent, using the discounted cash flow method.

If the impaired loan is identified as collateral dependent, then the fair value method of measuring the amount of impairment is utilized. This method requires obtaining a current independent appraisal of the collateral and applying a discount factor to the value.

If the impaired loan is determined not to be collateral dependent, then the discounted cash flow method is used. This method requires the impaired loan to be recorded at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. The effective interest rate of a loan is the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs, premiums or discount existing at origination or acquisition of the loan.

Impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow models. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Acquisition

Purchase accounting requires recording all assets and liabilities at their fair value. Fair values of financial assets and liabilities related to the Company’s acquisition of MFB Corp. were primarily determined using discounted cash flow models. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, these acquisition items are classified with Level 3 of the hierarchy.

			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Impaired loans	$	5,997	$	—	$	—	$	5,997
Mortgage servicing rights		2,776		—		—		2,776
Acquisition
Loans		378,075		—		—		378,075
Deposits		332,075		—		—		332,075
Borrowings		97,361		—		—		97,361

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:

Cash and Cash Equivalents - The fair value of cash and cash equivalents approximates carrying value.

Interest-Bearing Deposits - The fair value of interest-bearing deposits approximates carrying value.

Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities - Fair values are based on quoted market prices.

Loans Held For Sale - Fair values are based on quoted market prices.

Loans - The fair value for loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.

FHLB Stock - Fair value of FHLB stock is based on the price at which it may be resold to the FHLB.

Interest Receivable/Payable - The fair values of interest receivable/payable approximate carrying values.

Deposits - The fair values of noninterest-bearing, interest-bearing demand and savings accounts are equal to the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on such time deposits.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances - The fair value of these borrowings are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation, based on current rates for similar debt for periods comparable to the remaining terms to maturity of these advances.

Other Borrowings - The fair value of these borrowings approximate carrying values.

Notes Payable - The fair value of this note is estimated using a discount calculation based on current rates.

Advances by Borrowers for Taxes and Insurance - The fair value approximates carrying value.

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments - Commitments include commitments to purchase and originate mortgage loans, commitments to sell mortgage loans, and standby letters of credit and are generally of a short-term nature. The fair values of such commitments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. The carrying amounts of these investments are reasonable estimates of the fair value of these financial statements.

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:

	2008				2007
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	39,703	$	39,703	$	23,648	$	23,648
Interest-bearing deposits		—		—		100		100
Securities available for sale		77,255		77,255		43,592		43,592
Securities held to maturity		9,676		8,528		—		—
Loans held for sale		1,541		1,574		1,645		1,662
Loans		1,113,132		1,144,394		802,436		808,387
Stock in FHLB		18,632		18,632		10,037		10,037
Interest receivable		5,205		5,205		3,693		3,693

Liabilities
Deposits		962,514		974,072		666,407		666,986
FHLB advances		263,113		273,853		191,675		194,854
Other borrowings		15,345		16,173		3,907		3,907
Notes payable		647		640		1,055		994
Interest payable		2,116		2,116		2,467		2,467
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		3,229		3,229		1,464		1,464
Off-balance sheet commitments		—		—		—		—

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 27:

Condensed Financial Information (Parent Company Only)

Presented below is condensed financial information as to financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company:

Condensed Balance Sheets
	2008		2007
Assets
Cash on deposit with Bank	$	2,896	$	25
Cash on deposit with others		—		26
Total cash		2,896		51
Investment in common stock of Bank		142,417		86,507
Investment in affiliate		—		800
Deferred and current income tax		669		143
Other assets		40		9

Total assets	$	146,022	$	87,510

Liabilities
Other borrowings	$	15,345	$	496
Other liabilities		162		—

Total liabilities		15,507		496

Stockholders' Equity		130,515		87,014

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	146,022	$	87,510

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Condensed Statements of Operations
	2008			2007			2006
Income
Interest income from Bank	$	10		$	29		$	111
Dividends from Bank		3,000			2,200			—
Other income		—			56			317
Total income		3,010			2,285			428

Expenses		1,221			383			368

Income before income tax and equity in undistributed income of the Bank		1,789			1,902			60

Income tax benefit		(412	)		(118	)		(8	)

Income before equity in undistributed income (distributions in excess of income) of the Bank		2,201			2,020			68

Equity in undistributed income (distributions in excess of income) of the Bank		(24,299	)		2,206			4,689

Net income (loss)	$	(22,098	)	$	4,226		$	4,757

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
	2008			2007			2006

Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	(22,098	)	$	4,226		$	4,757
Item not requiring cash
ESOP shares earned		343			583			665
Deferred income tax benefit		(251	)		—			26
Distributions in excess of income (equity in undistributed income) of the Bank		24,299			(2,206	)		(4,689	)
Other		(13	)		620			(345	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		2,280			3,223			414

Investing Activities
Proceeds from sale of investment		431			—			—
Loss on sale of investment		329			—			—
Investment in bank		(29,144	)		—			—
Cash paid in acquisition, net		(9,115	)		—			—
Maturity of certificate of deposit		—			100			—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(37,499	)		100			—

Financing Activities
Repayment of other borrowings		(496	)		—			—
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		11,500			—			—
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		32,382			—			—
Stock repurchased		(1,811	)		(2,793	)		(4,935	)
Cash dividends		(3,490	)		(2,440	)		(2,360	)
Proceeds from stock options exercised		—			209			687
Tax benefit on stock options and RRP shares		(21	)		3			45
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		38,064			(5,021	)		(6,563	)

Net Change in Cash		2,845			(1,698	)		(6,149	)

Cash, Beginning of Year		51			1,749			7,898

Cash, End of Year	$	2,896		$	51		$	1,749

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 28:

Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

Quarter Ended	Interest Income		Interest Expense		Net Interest Income		Provision for Loan Losses		Net Income (Loss)			Basic Earnings Per Common Share			Diluted Earnings Per Common Share

2008
March	$	13,757	$	7,397	$	6,360	$	612	$	1,215		$	0.30		$	0.30
June		13,489		6,689		6,800		733		1,175			0.30			0.30
September		18,825		8,989		9,836		913		359			0.06			0.06
December		19,108		8,564		10,544		4,762		(24,847	)		(3.65	)		(3.65	)

Total	$	65,179	$	31,639	$	33,540	$	7,020	$	(22,098	)		(4.22	)		(4.22	)
2007
March	$	13,809	$	7,814	$	5,995	$	332	$	1,044		$	0.25		$	0.25
June		14,056		7,941		6,115		533		1,129			0.27			0.27
September		14,128		8,277		5,851		532		1,161			0.28			0.28
December		14,380		8,195		6,185		843		892			0.22			0.22

Total	$	56,373	$	32,227	$	24,146	$	2,240	$	4,226			1.03			1.02

Earnings in the fourth quarter 2009 were negatively impacted primarily due to a goodwill impairment of $22.6 million, net of tax and increased loan loss provisions due to the current decline in the economy.

Note 29:

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Special Assessment

Subsequent to December 31, 2008, the Board of Directors of the FDIC voted to adopt an interim rule that would impose a special assessment on insured institutions of between 10 and 20 basis points on outstanding deposits as of June 30, 2009. This assessment is to be collected on September 30, 2009. The interim rule would also permit the Board to impose an emergency special assessment after June 30, 2009, of up to 10 basis points on outstanding deposits, if deemed necessary by the Board.

Item 9.

Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures.

An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Section 13(a)-14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of December 31, 2008, was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the our Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and several other members of our senior management within the 90-day period preceding the filing date of this annual report. Our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to our management (including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, that have materially affected, or as reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. The annual report of management on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the attestation report thereon issued by our independent registered public accounting firm are set forth below under “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” and “Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”

We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within MutualFirst have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgment in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of MutualFirst Financial, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention of overriding controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework . Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2008, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

The Company’s independent auditors have issued an audit report on our assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. This report is included in this Form 10-K. See “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” which follows this report.

Date: March 23, 2009	By:	/s/ David W. Heeter
		David W. Heeter
		President and Chief Executive Officer

	By:	/s/ Timothy J. McArdle
		Timothy J. McArdle
		Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders

MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Muncie, Indiana

We have audited MutualFirst Financial, Inc’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) . The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, MutualFirst Financial, Inc. has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) .

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of MutualFirst Financial, Inc. and our report dated March 23, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/BKD, LLP

BKD, LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

March 23, 2009

Item 9B.

Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Directors

Information concerning the Company’s directors is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in April 2009, except for information contained under the headings “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Report of the Audit/Compliance Committee,” a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.

Executive Officers

Information concerning the executive officers of the Company who are directors is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in April 2009, except for information contained under the headings “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Report of the Audit/Compliance Committee,” a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.

The business experience for at least the past five years for each of our executive officers who do not serve as directors is set forth below.

John H. Bowles . Age 63 years. Mr. Bowles is Senior Vice President of Investment and Private Banking, a position he has held since November 2004. Prior to 2004, he was president of Star Financial Bank/NewCastle Region from 1987 to 2004.

Timothy J. McArdle . Age 58 years. Mr. McArdle, a certified public accountant, has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MutualBank since 1995, and Treasurer of MutualBank since 1986. He also serves as Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Controller of MutualFirst Financial. He has been employed by MutualBank since 1981.

Stephen C. Selby . Age 63 years. Since 1995, Mr. Selby has served as Senior Vice President of the Operations Division at MutualBank. Prior to 1995, he served as Vice President of the Operations Division for nine years. Mr. Selby has served in various other capacities at MutualBank since 1964.

Donald R. Kyle . Age 62 years. Mr. Kyle has served as Senior Vice President of the Business Banking Division of the Bank since July 2008. Prior to joining the Bank, he had served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of MFB Financial since July 1999. Previously, he served as Regional President of National City Bank.

Sharon L. Ferguson . Age 53 years. Ms. Ferguson has served as Senior Vice President of the Risk Management of the Bank since January 2009. Prior was Senior Vice President of Consumer Banking effective April 1, 2008. She has been with the bank since March 1998.

James P. Coleman, III . Age 62 years. Mr. Coleman has served as Senior Vice President of the Wealth Management, Trust and Private Banking Division of the Bank’s since July 2008. Prior to joining the Bank, he served as Executive Vice President and Director of Wealth Management) at MFB Financial since June 2004. Previously, he served as President of STAR Wealth Management in Fort Wayne, Indiana and as Senior Vice President of 1st Source Bank in South Bend, Indiana prior to his employment with STAR.

Audit Committee Matters and Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Board of Directors of the Company has a standing Audit/Compliance Committee, which has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The members of that committee are Directors Linn A. Crull (Chairman), Wilbur R. Davis, Edward J. Dobrow, Jerry D. McVicker, Edward J. Levy, Jonathan C. Kintner and James D. Rosema, all of whom are considered independent under applicable Nasdaq listing standards. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Crull and Mr. Levy are both considered to be an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules. Additional information concerning the audit committee of the Company’s Board of Directors is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in April 2008, except for information contained under the headings “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Report of the Audit/Compliance Committee,” a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the SEC reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with.

Code of Ethics

The Company adopted a written Code of Ethics based upon the standards set forth under Item 406 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act. The Code of Ethics applies to all of the Company’s directors, officers and employees. A copy of the Company’s Code of Ethics was filed with the SEC as Exhibit 14 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. You may obtain a copy of the Code of Ethics on our website at www.bankwithmutual.com at “Resource Center – About Us – Code of Ethics,” or free of charge from the Company by writing to our Corporate Secretary at MutualFirst Financial, Inc., 110 E. Charles Street, Muncie, Indiana 47305-2419 or by calling (765) 747-2800.

Nomination Procedures

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in June 2008, except for information contained under the headings “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Report of the Audit/Compliance Committee,” a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in June 2008, except for information contained under the headings “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Report of the Audit/Compliance Committee,” a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.

Equity Compensation Plan Information. The following table summarizes our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2008.

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		643,498	$	13.99		357,902	(1)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—

(1) Includes 5,161 shares available for future grants under MutualFirst Financial, Inc’s 2001 stock option plan and 352,741 shares available for future grants under MutualFirst Financial, Inc.’s 2008 stock option plan.

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions, our independent directors and our audit and nominating committee charters is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in June 2008, except for information contained under the headings “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Report of the Audit/Compliance Committee,” a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information concerning principal accountant fees and services is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in June 2008, except for information contained under the headings “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Report of the Audit/Compliance Committee,” a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) List of Financial Statements

The following are contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K:

Annual Report Section

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(a)(2) List of Financial Statement Schedules:

All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the information is not required under the related instructions or is not applicable.

(a)(3) List of Exhibits: [REVIEW AND DETERMINE IF THIS IS COMPLETE]

Regulation S-K Exhibit Number	Document	Reference to Prior Filing or Exhibit Number Attached Hereto
2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 7, 2008, by and among MutualFirst Financial, Inc., MutualFirst Acquisition Corp. and MFB Corp.	#
3.1	Articles of Incorporation	*
3.2	Articles Supplementary for the Series A Preferred Stock	+
3.3	Amended Bylaws	###
4.1	Form of Common Stock Certificate	*
4.2	Form of Certificate for the Series A Preferred Stock	4.2
4.3	Warrant for Purchase of Shares of Common Stock	*
9	Voting Trust Agreement	None
10.1	Employment Agreement with David W. Heeter	+++
10.2	Employment Agreement with Patrick C. Botts	+++
10.3	Employment Agreement with Timothy J. McArdle	**
10.4	Form of Supplemental Retirement Plan Income Agreements for Steven	**
10.5	Campbell, Patrick C. Botts, David W. Heeter, Timothy J. McArdle and Stephen C. Selby
10.6	Form of Director Shareholder Benefit Program Agreement, as amended, for Jerry D. McVicker	++
10.7	Form of Agreements for Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for Patrick C. Botts, Steven Campbell, David W. Heeter Timothy J. McArdle and Stephen C. Selby	**
10.8	Registrant’s 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan	***
10.9	Registrant’s 2001 Recognition and Retention Plan	***
10.10	Named Executive Officer Bonus Arrangements for 2009	10.10
10.11	Director Fee Arrangements for 2009	10.11
10.12	Director Deferred Compensation Plan	##
10.13	MutualFirst Financial, Inc. 2008 Stock Option and Incentive Plan	10.13
10.14	MFB Corp. 2002 Stock Option Plan	10.14
10.15	MFB Corp. 1997 Stock Option Plan	10.15
10.16	Employment Agreement with Charles J. Viater	10.16
10.17	Salary Continuation Agreement with Charles J. Viater	10.17
10.18	Letter Agreement (including Schedule A, Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 23, 2008 between MutualFirst Financial, Inc. and United States Department of the Treasury with respect to the issuance and sale of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrant	+

Regulation S-K Exhibit Number	Document	Reference to Prior Filing or Exhibit Number Attached Hereto
10.19	Form of compensation modification	+
11	Statement re computation of per share earnings	None
12	Statements re computation of ratios	None
14	Code of Ethics	+++
16	Letter re change in certifying accountant	None
18	Letter re change in accounting principles	None
21	Subsidiaries of the registrant	21
22	Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders	None
23	Consents of Experts and Counsel	23
24	Power of Attorney	None
31.1	Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification (Chief Executive Officer)	31.1
31.2	Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification (Chief Financial Officer)	31.2
32	Section 1350 Certification	32

#	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2008 (File No. 000-27905). Such previously filed document is incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

*	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form S-1 registration statement filed on September 16, 1999 (File No. 333-87239) pursuant to Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. Such previously filed document is incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

**	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2001 (File No. 000-27905). Such previously filed document is incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

***	Filed as an Appendix to the Company’s Form S-4/A Registration Statement filed on October 19, 2001 (File No. 333-46510). Such previously filed document is incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

++	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 2, 2002 (File No. 000-27905). Such previously filed document is incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

+++	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2005 (File No. 000-27905). Such previously filed document is incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

##	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2007 (File No. 000-27905). Such previously filed document is incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

+	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2008 (File No. 000-27905). Such previously filed document is incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

###	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October15, 2007 (File No. 000-27905). Such previously filed document is incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

####	Filed as an Appendix to the Company’s Form S-4 Registration Statement filed on April 8, 2008 (File No. 333-150138). Such previously filed document is incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

(b) Exhibits - Included, see list in (a)(3).

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		MutualFirst Financial, Inc.

Date: March 23, 2009	By:	/s/ David W. Heeter
		David W. Heeter, President and Chief Executive Officer
		Duly Authorized Representative)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ David W. Heeter		/s/ Wilbur R. Davis
David W. Heeter, President and Director		Wilbur R. Davis, Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 23, 2009		Date: March 23, 2009


/s/ Patrick C. Botts		/s/ Edward J. Dobrow
Patrick C. Botts, Director		Edward J. Dobrow, Director

Date: March 23, 2009		Date: March 23, 2009


/s/ Linn A. Crull		/s/ James D. Rosema
Linn A. Crull, Director		James D. Rosema, Director

Date: March 23, 2009		Date: March 23, 2009


/s/ William V. Hughes		/s/ Jerry D. McVicker
William V. Hughes, Director		Jerry D. McVicker, Director

Date: March 23, 2009		Date: March 23, 2009


/s/ Jon R. Marler		/s/ Jonathan E. Kintner, O.D.
Jon R. Marler, Director		Jonathan E. Kintner, O.D. , Director

Date: March 23, 2009		Date: March 23, 2009

/s/ Edward C. Levy		/s/ Michael J. Marien
Edward C. Levy , Director		Michael J. Marien , Director

Date: March 23, 2009		Date: March 23, 2009

/s/ Charles J. Viater		/s/ Timothy J. McArdle
Charles J. Viater , Director		Timothy J. McArdle, Senior Vice President
		Treasurer and Controller
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: March 23, 2009		Date: March 23, 2009

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Number	Description

4.2	Form of Certificate for the Series A Preferred Stock

10.10	Named Executive Officer Bonus Arrangements for 2009

10.11	Director Fee Arrangements for 2009

10.13	MutualFirst Financial, Inc. 2008 Stock Option and Incentive Plan

10.14	MFB Corp. 2002 Stock Option Plan

10.15	MFB Corp. 1997 Stock Option Plan

10.16	Employment Agreement with Charles J. Viater

10.17	Salary Continuation Agreement with Charles J. Viater

21	Subsidiaries of the Registrant

23	Consent of Accountants

31.1	Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification (Chief Executive Officer)

31.2	Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification (Chief Financial Officer)

32	Section 1350 Certification

************************		************************
Rosalie Petro		David W. Heeter
Secretary		President and Chief Executive Officer

	Page

ARTICLE I PURPOSE	3

Section 1.1 General purpose of the plan.	3

ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS	3

ARTICLE III AVAILABLE SHARES	6

Section 3.1 Shares available under the plan.	6
Section 3.2 Maximum awards.	6
Section 3.3 Lapsed awards.	6

ARTICLE IV ADMINISTRATION	6

Section 4.1 Committee.	6
Section 4.2 Committee powers.	7

ARTICLE V STOCK OPTIONS	7

Section 5.1 Grant of options.	7
Section 5.2 Size of option.	8
Section 5.3 Exercise price.	8
Section 5.4 Exercise period.	8
Section 5.5 Vesting date.	8
Section 5.6 Additional restrictions on incentive stock options.	9
Section 5.7 Method of exercise.	9
Section 5.8 Limitations on options.	10
Section 5.9 Prohibition against option repricing.	11

ARTICLE VI STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS	11

Section 6.1 Grant of stock appreciation rights.	11
Section 6.2 Size of stock appreciation right.	12
Section 6.3 Exercise price.	12
Section 6.4 Exercise period.	12
Section 6.5 Vesting date.	13
Section 6.6 Method of exercise.	13
Section 6.7 Limitations on stock appreciation rights.	14
Section 6.8 Prohibition against stock appreciation right repricing.	15

ARTICLE VII SPECIAL TAX PROVISION	15

Section 7.1 Tax withholding rights.	15

ARTICLE VIII AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION	15

Section 8.1 Termination	15
Section 8.2 Amendment.	15
Section 8.3 Adjustments for changes in capitalization.	15

ARTICLE IX MISCELLANEOUS	16

Section 9.1 Status as an employee benefit plan.	16
Section 9.2 No right to continued service	16
Section 9.3 Construction of language.	16
Section 9.4 Governing law.	17
Section 9.5 Headings.	17
Section 9.6 Non-alienation of benefits.	17
Section 9.7 Notices.	17
Section 9.8 Approval of stockholders.	17

Attest:	MUTUAL FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK

/s/ Rosalie Petro	/s/ David W. Heeter
Secretary	By:	David W. Heeter
	Its:	Chief Executive Officer

	MUTUALFIRST FINANCIAL, INC.

/s/ Rosalie Petro _________________	/s/ David W. Heeter
Secretary	By:	David W. Heeter
	Its:	President and Chief Executive Officer

	EMPLOYEE

	/s/ Charles J. Viater
	Charles J. Viater

EXECUTIVE:	MFB FINANCIAL

	By:
CHARLES J. VIATER	Title:	DONALD R. KYLE, Executive
		Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Parent	Subsidiary	Percentage of Ownership			State of Incorporation or Organization
MutualFirst Financial, Inc.	MutualBank		100	%	United States
	MFBC Statutory Trust I		100	%	Indiana
MutualBank	First M.F.S.B. Corporation		100	%	Indiana
	Mutual Federal Investment Co.		100	%	Nevada
	Mishawaka Financial Services, Inc.		100	%	Indiana
Mutual Federal Investment Co.	Mutual Federal REIT, Inc.		100	%	Maryland